905Z04101
40
Parts 136 to 149
Revised as of July 1,2004
Protection of Environment

-------

-------
40
Parts 136 to 149
Revised as of July 1, 2004
Protection of
Environment
Containing a codification of documents
of general applicability and future effect

As of July 1, 2004

With Andllaries

Published by
Office of the Federal Register
National Archives and Records
Administration
A Special Edition of the Federal Register

-------
               U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
                       WASHINGTON : 2004
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800
       Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001

-------
           Table  of  Contents

                                                        Page
Explanation 	      v
Title 40:


     Chapter I—Environmental Protection Agency (Continued) 	      3



Finding Aids:


   Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference 	    845


   Table of CFB Titles and Chapters 	    867


   Alphabetical List of Agencies Appearing in the CFB 	    885


   List of CFR Sections Affected	    895
                            iii

-------
Cite this Code:  CFR

To cite the regulations in
  this volume use title,
  part and section num-
  ber. Thus, 40 CFR 136.1
  refers to title 40, part
  136, section 1.
            iv

-------
                               Explanation
  The Code of Federal Regulations is a codification of the general and permanent
rules published in the Federal Register by the Executive departments and agen-
cies of the Federal Government. The Code is divided into 50 titles which represent
broad areas subject to  Federal  regulation. Each  title is divided into  chapters
which usually bear the name of the issuing agency. Each chapter is further sub-
divided into parts covering specific regulatory areas.
  Each volume of the Code is revised at least once each calendar year and issued
on a quarterly basis approximately as follows:
     Title 1 through Title 16	as of January 1
     Title 17 through Title 27	as of April 1
     Title 28 through Title 41	as  of July 1
     Title 42 through Title 50	as of October 1
  The appropriate revision date is printed on  the cover of each volume.
LEGAL STATUS
  The contents  of the Federal Register are required to be  judicially  noticed (44
U.S.C. 1507). The Code of Federal Regulations is prima facie evidence  of the text
of the original documents (44 U.S.C. 1510).
HOW TO  USE THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
  The Code of Federal Regulations is kept up to date by the individual issues
of the Federal Register. These two publications must be used together to deter-
mine the latest version of any given rule.
  To determine  whether a Code volume has been amended since its revision  date
(in  this case, July 1, 2004),  consult the "List of CFR Sections Affected (LSA),"
which is  issued monthly, and the "Cumulative List of Parts Affected," which ap-
pears in  the Reader Aids section of the daily Federal Register. These two  lists
will identify the Federal Register page number  of the latest amendment of any
given rule.
EFFECTIVE AND EXPIRATION DATES
  Each volume of the Code  contains amendments published in the Federal Reg-
ister  since the last revision of  that volume of the Code. Source citations for
the regulations are referred to by volume number and page number of the Federal
Register  and date of publication. Publication dates and  effective dates  are  usu-
ally not  the  same  and care must be exercised  by the user  in determining the
actual effective  date. In instances where the effective date is beyond  the  cut-
off  date  for the Code a  note has been inserted to reflect the future  effective
date. In  those instances where a regulation published in  the Federal  Register
states a date certain for expiration, an appropriate note will be inserted following
the text.
OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
  The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L.  96-511) requires Federal  agencies
to display  an OMB control number with their information collection  request.

-------
Many agencies have begun publishing numerous OMB control numbers as amend-
ments to existing regulations in the CFR. These OMB numbers are  placed as
close as possible to the applicable recordkeeping or reporting requirements.
OBSOLETE PROVISIONS
  Provisions that become obsolete before the revision date stated on  the cover
of each volume  are not  carried. Code users may find the text of provisions in
effect on a given date in the past by  using  the appropriate numerical list of
sections affected. For  the period before January 1, 2001, consult either the  List
of CFR Sections Affected, 1949-1963,  1964-1972, 1973-1985, or  1986-2000,  published
in 11 separate volumes. For the period beginning January 1, 2001, a "List of  CFR
Sections Affected" is published at the end of each CFR volume.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
  What is incorporation by reference? Incorporation by reference was established
by statute and allows Federal agencies to meet the requirement to publish regu-
lations  in the Federal  Register by referring to materials already published  else-
where. For an incorporation to be valid, the Director of the Federal Register
must approve it. The legal effect of incorporation by reference is that  the mate-
rial  is treated as if it were published in full in the Federal Register (5 U.S.C.
552(a)).  This  material,  like any  other properly issued regulation, has the force
of law.
  What is a proper incorporation by reference? The Director of the Federal Register
will  approve  an incorporation by reference only when the requirements of 1  CFR
part 51 are met. Some of the elements on which approval is based are:
  (a) The incorporation  will substantially reduce the volume of material  pub-
lished in the  Federal Register.
  (b) The  matter incorporated is in fact available to  the extent necessary to
afford fairness and uniformity in the administrative process.
  (c) The  incorporating  document is drafted and submitted for publication in
accordance with 1 CFR part 51.
  Properly approved incorporations by reference in this volume are listed in the
Finding Aids at the end of this volume.
  What if the material  incorporated by reference cannot be found? If you have any
problem locating or obtaining a copy of material listed in the Finding Aids of
this  volume as an approved incorporation by reference, please contact the agency
that issued the regulation containing that incorporation. If, after contacting the
agency, you find the material is not available, please notify the Director of the
Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC
20408, or call  (202) 741-6010.
CFR INDEXES AND TABULAR GUIDES
  A  subject index to the Code of Federal Regulations is contained in a separate
volume, revised  annually as of January 1, entitled CFR INDEX AND FINDING AIDS.
This volume contains  the Parallel Table of Statutory Authorities and Agency
Rules (Table  I). A  list of CFR  titles, chapters, and  parts and an alphabetical
list of agencies publishing in the CFR are also included in this volume.
  An index to the text of "Title 3—The President" is carried within that volume.
  The Federal Register Index is issued monthly in cumulative form. This index
is based on a consolidation of the "Contents" entries in the daily Federal Register.
  A  List of  CFR Sections Affected (LSA) is published monthly, keyed to the
revision dates of the 50 CFR titles.
REPUBLICATION OF MATERIAL

                                     vi

-------
  There  are no restrictions  on the republication of material appearing in  the
Code of Federal Regulations.
INQUIRIES
  For  a  legal interpretation or explanation of any regulation in this volume,
contact the issuing agency.  The issuing agency's name appears at the top of
odd-numbered pages.
  For  inquiries concerning CFR reference assistance, call 202-741-6000 or write
to the Director, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records
Administration, Washington,  DC 20408 or e-mail fedreg.info@nara.gov.
SALES
  The  Government Printing  Office (GPO) processes all sales and distribution of
the CFR. For payment by credit card, call toll free, 866-512-1800 or DC area, 202-
512-1800,  M-F, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. e.s.t. or fax your  order to 202-512-2250, 24 hours
a day.  For payment by check, write to the Superintendent of Documents, Attn:
New Orders, P.O. Box 371954,  Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. For GPO Customer Serv-
ice call 202-512-1803.
ELECTRONIC SERVICES
  The  full text  of the Code  of Federal Regulations, The United States Govern-
ment Manual, the Federal Register, Public Laws, Public Papers, Weekly Compila-
tion of Presidential Documents and the Privacy Act Compilation are available
in electronic format at www.gpoaccess.gov/nara ("GPO Access"). For more infor-
mation,  contact Electronic  Information Dissemination  Services, U.S. Govern-
ment Printing  Office.  Phone  202-512-1530, or  888-293-6498  (toll-free).  E-mail,
gpoaccess@gpo.gov.
  The  Office of the Federal  Register also offers a free service on the National
Archives and Records Administration's (NARA) World Wide  Web site for public
law numbers,  Federal Register finding aids,  and related information. Connect
to NARA's web  site at www.archives.gov/federal	register. The NARA site also
contains  links to GPO Access.

                                                 RAYMOND A. MOSLEY,
                                                                Director,
                                                Office  of the Federal Register.
  July  1,  2004.
                                    Vll

-------

-------
                                 THIS TITLE

  Title 40—PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT is composed of thirty volumes. The parts
in these volumes are arranged in the following: order: parts 1-49, parts 50-51, part
52 (52.01-52.1018), part 52 (52.1019-End), parts 53-59, part 60 (60.1-End), part 60 (Ap-
pendices), parts 61-62, part 63 (63.1-63.599), part 63 (63.600-1-63.1199), part 63 (63.1200-
63.1439), part 63 (63.1440-63.8830), part 63 (63.8980-End) parts 64-71, parts 72-80, parts
81-85, part 86 (86.1-86.599-99) part 86 (86.600-1-End), parts 87-99, parts 100-135, parts
136-149, parts 150-189, parts 190-259, parts 260-265, parts 266-299, parts 300-399, parts
400-424, parts 425-699, parts  700-789, and part 790  to End. The contents  of these
volumes represent all current  regulations codified under this title of the  CFR
as of July 1, 2004.

  Chapter I—Environmental Protection Agency appears in all thirty volumes.
An alphabetical Listing  of Pesticide Chemicals Index appears in parts 150-189.
Regulations issued by the Council  on Environmental Quality appear in the vol-
ume containing part 790 to End. The  OMB control numbers for title 40 appear
in §9.1 of this chapter.

  For this volume,  Cheryl E. Sirofchuck  was Chief Editor. The Code of Federal
Regulations publication program is under the direction of Frances D. McDonald,
assisted by Alomha S. Morris.
                                      IX

-------
Would you like to

know...

if any changes have been made to the Code
of Federal Regulations or what documents
have been published in the Federal Register
without reading the Federal Register every
day? If so, you may wish to subscribe to the
LSA (List of CFR Sections Affected), the
Federal Register Index, or both.

LSA
The LSA (List of CFR Sections Affected) is
designed to lead users of the Code of Federal
Regulations to amendatory actions published in
the Federal Register. The LSA is issued monthly in
cumulative form. Entries indicate the nature of the
changes—such as revised, removed, or corrected.
$31 per year.

Federal Register Index
The index, covering the contents of the daily
Federal Register,  is issued monthly in cumulative
form. Entries are carried primarily under the names
of the issuing agencies. Significant subjects are
carried as cross-references.
$28 per year.

A finding aid is included in each publication which
lists Federal Register page numbers with the date
of publication in the Federal Register.
Superintendent of Documents Subscription Order Form

 G  YES, send me the following indicated subscriptions for one year:

 	LSA (List of CFR Sections Affected), (LCS) for $31 per year.

 	Federal Register Index (FRSU) $28 per year.

                         (Includes regular shipping and handling.)

                         For privacy check box below:

                         Q Do not make my name available to other mailers

                         Check method of payment:

                         Q Check payable to Superintendent of Documents

                         QGPO Deposit Account I   I  I   I   I   I  I   I
Order Processing Code
*5421
The total cost of my order is $	
Price is subject to change  International
customers please add 25%.
Company or personal name
Street address
City, State, ZIP code
                                     Q VISA Q MasterCard L
                                                                    (expiration date)
Daytime phone with area code
Purchase order No.
                          (optional)
   Fax your orders (202) 512-2250
Phone your orders (202) 512-1800
                         Credit card No.                 (must be 20 digits)

                                           Thank you for your order!



                         Authorizing signature                       7/oo

                         Mail To: Superintendent of Documents
                                P.O. Box 371954
                                Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
                                        X

-------
  Title 40—Protection  of
        Environment
         (This book contains parts 136 to 149)
                               Part

CHAPTER I—Environmental Protection Agency (Continued)  136

-------

-------
   CHAPTER  I—ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION
               AGENCY  (CONTINUED)
 EDITORIAL NOTE: Nomenclature changes to chapter I appear at 65 FR 47324, 47325, Aug. 2,
2000, and at 66 FR 34375, 34376, June 28, 2001.

         SUBCHAPTER D—WATER PROGRAMS (CONTINUED)

Part                                                   Page
136     Guidelines establishing test procedures for the
         analysis of pollutants	    5
140     Marine sanitation device standard	   339
141     National primary drinking water regulations 	   343
142     National primary drinking  water  regulations im-
         plementation 	   561
143     National secondary drinking water regulations 	   616
144     Underground injection control program 	   618
145     State UIC program requirements 	   685
146     Underground  injection control program: Criteria
         and standards  	   698
147     State underground injection control programs	   728
148     Hazardous waste injection restrictions 	   829
149     Sole source aquifers 	   838

-------

-------
      SUBCHAPTER D—WATER PROGRAMS (CONTINUED)
PART    136—GUIDELINES    ESTAB-
  LISHING  TEST  PROCEDURES  FOR
  THE ANALYSIS  OF POLLUTANTS

Sec.
136.1  Applicability.
136.2  Definitions.
136.3  Identification of test procedures.
136.4  Application  for alternate  test proce-
   dures.
136.5  Approval of alternate test procedures.
APPENDIX A TO PART 136—METHODS FOE OR-
   GANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF MUNICIPAL
   AND INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER
APPENDIX B TO PART 136—DEFINITION AND
   PROCEDURE FOR  THE DETERMINATION OF
   THE METHOD DETECTION LIMIT—REVISION
   1.11
APPENDIX C TO PART 136—INDUCTIVELY COU-
   PLED  PLASMA—ATOMIC  EMISSION  SPEC-
   TROMETRIC METHOD FOR TRACE ELEMENT
   ANALYSIS OF WATER AND WASTES METHOD
   200.7
APPENDIX D TO PART 136—PRECISION AND RE-
   COVERY STATEMENTS FOR  METHODS FOR
   MEASURING METALS
  AUTHORITY: Sees. 301, 304(h), 307 and 501(a),
Pub. L. 95-217, 91 Stat. 1566, et seg. (33 U.S.C.
1251,  et seg.) (the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act Amendments of 1972 as amended
by the Clean Water Act of 1977).

§136.1  Applicability.
  The   procedures prescribed  herein
shall, except as noted in § 136.5, be used
to perform the measurements indicated
whenever the waste constituent  speci-
fied is required to be measured for:
  (a) An application submitted  to the
Administrator, or  to a State having an
approved NPDES program for a permit
under  section 402  of the Clean Water
Act of 1977,  as amended (CWA), and/or
to reports required to be  submitted
under  NPDES   permits or  other re-
quests for quantitative  or qualitative
effluent  data under parts 122 to  125 of
title 40, and,
  (b) Reports required to be  submitted
by discharges under the NPDES estab-
lished by parts 124 and 125 of this chap-
ter, and,
  (c)  Certifications issued by  States
pursuant to section 401  of the CWA, as
amended.
[38 FR 28758, Oct.  16, 1973,  as amended at 49
FR 43250, Oct. 26, 1984]
§136.2 Definitions.
  As used in this part, the term:
  (a) Act means the Clean Water Act of
1977, Pub. L. 95-217, 91 Stat. 1566, et seq.
(33 U.S.C.  1251  et  seq.) (The  Federal
Water Pollution  Control Act  Amend-
ments of 1972 as amended by the Clean
Water Act of 1977).
  (b) Administrator means the Adminis-
trator of the U.S. Environmental  Pro-
tection Agency.
  (c) Regional  Administrator means one
of the EPA Regional Administrators.
  (d) Director means the Director of the
State Agency  authorized to carry out
an approved National  Pollutant  Dis-
charge Elimination System Program
under section 402 of the Act.
  (e) National Pollutant Discharge Elimi-
nation System  (NPDES)  means  the na-
tional system for the issuance of per-
mits under section 402  of the Act and
includes  any State or  interstate  pro-
gram which has been approved by the
Administrator, in  whole  or in  part,
pursuant to section 402 of the Act.
  (f) Detection limit means the minimum
concentration  of  an  analyte  (sub-
stance) that can be measured and re-
ported with a  99%  confidence that the
analyte concentration is greater  than
zero as determined by  the procedure
set forth at appendix B of this part.

[38 FR 28758, Oct. 16, 1973,  as amended at 49
FR 43250, Oct. 26, 1984]

§136.3 Identification  of  test  proce-
    dures.
  (a)  Parameters  or  pollutants,  for
which methods are approved, are listed
together with test procedure  descrip-
tions  and references in Tables IA, IB,
1C, ID, IE, and IP. The  full text of the
referenced  test procedures are incor-
porated by reference into Tables IA, IB,
1C, ID, IE, and IP. The incorporation by
reference of these documents, as speci-
fied in paragraph (b)  of this  section,
was approved  by  the Director of the
Federal Register  in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies
of the documents may be obtained from
the sources listed in paragraph (b) of

-------
§136.3
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
this section. Information regarding ob-
taining these documents  can be  ob-
tained from the EPA  Office of Water
Statistics  and   Analytical  Support
Branch at 202-56&-1000.  Documents may
be inspected at EPA's Water Docket,
EPA West, 1301 Constitution Avenue,
NW.,   Boom   B135,  Washington,  DC
(Telephone: 202-566-2426); or at the Na-
tional  Archives and Records Adminis-
tration (NARA).  For  information on
the availability  of this  material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:  http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of_Jederal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.   These   test  proce-
dures are incorporated as they exist on
the day  of  approval and  a notice of
anys change  in these  test  procedures
will be published in the FEDERAL REG-
ISTER.  The discharge parameter values
for which reports are required must be
determined by one of the standard ana-
lytical test procedures incorporated by
reference  and described  in Tables IA,
IB, 1C, IE, and IF, or by any alternate
test procedure which has been approved
by the Administrator under the provi-
sions  of paragraph (d) of this section
and §§136.4 and 136.5. Under certain cir-
cumstances (paragraph (b) or (c) of this
section or 40 CFR 401.13) other test pro-
cedures may  be  more  advantageous
when  such other test procedures have
been  previously approved  by the Re-
gional Administrator of the  Region in
which the discharge will  occur, and
providing the  Director of the State in
which such  discharge  will occur does
not object to the use of such alternate
test procedure.

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                §136.3
UI
m

a
UJ

       ui
       o
     ui

     O
                O CD  CD  CO   ^J-T-
i 5.8
a s

Q. Q.
                                                    8 S S
            a.   o. o.  Q. a.
                                 §88
                                      CL CL  a.
       i
                      §
                      i
                      1
                !.€•>  «  CO
                          i!
                                       rt
           a •»

           "I
                         w Z  £ «
                              »  s  s;
                              z  «"  
-------
§136.3
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    CO

    §
I
 O
 m
 o

 §
 cr
 .
 O
 I—
 CO
       o  o   o   o
          o   o>   r»
                           8  8    8
                           o  o    o
                                           8  g
                                              O  W
                                                           il«i
                                                           i:S3?i
                                                           t > > rt J
                      3 y >
                      T
                   -
                                  Pi,
                                   50 g
                                  ..; ^ E 5.

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §136.3
II
^e
S*
ijfPiil s its? i
^a||||| . ifrt. s
                                               i
                                               Si1  E  isl^ati
                                               -3  ?  m**a

                                                8  "  ^TB

                                               s*  i  i^iii«
                                               dg  C  990S51US
                                               X™

-------
§136.3
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                   10

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                         §136.3
                                         d
                                         o
                                         Ri
                            i  2!
                                         S.' S
                                         2 !
                                         Ss 5
                                I   231
           i!
                                  S
                                  5 D
5f|   |i|
 « ng
                    -   £' *«"
                    Q   r. "I
                    m   m mm
                    8   S 8
                                         iff
o u^.
CO £0 co
*- n p
£ £
                                                        !:-
cam

H§
CO CO
I  I
i  I
m  o
a*~  S
   1/5
              00
              5 S
                            «  c
                            i  5
                                      a
                                      • j  S

                                      "  I
                                                                ll
                                                                S E.
                                 11

-------
§136.3
                       40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                                          S
                                                          I
 o

1
                                             J..L
                                                                  i- O
                                                                 CO ** r-
                                                                 5!!
               "P  T
               CNI  CU
               in  \f>
               O  Q
                                                                 m
                                                                 o
                                                                 -s  5  E |
            !• ° 11  S.  o I
              o
?^o   .3
ill  s?ii
ill  p  II
 c?  1,  a?
            ??.
            BS ;
                         'I
                                 12

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §136.3
                                    O
                           1 1
            5 '
            
-------
§136.3
                                         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                  I  i
T3

I
•:

§


1
UJ
cc
D
Q
 cr
 Q.
                                                 !!
                  m
                  o
                                   O    O   Ql
                                                               o
                                                               <
O
UJ
*
fc
 UJ

 §
                                        "O

                                        51
                              fell
                              CD CO CD
                              i- CO O
                              ^ ^ CM
                              CO CO CO
                                                               o
                                                               5
                                                               m
                          CV1
                          UJ   « i
                          CO   CO i
                          CM   CM I


         £s-g!,!
         •lf^tl"

         g Q. «3 S « ^
                     'M
                     ! ^  9
                                                     i I
                                                       Sn
»-i*l  ^
                           It  I
                                            i|]
                                            l*i
                     I  '.Mi  i
                    .;
                 CO    O) "
                 CM    OJ
                                     !i
                                     to
                               14

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                §136.3
n  W
Ri  ;
R  I
o>  2
                            81
                            fc
z $
                                        S 8
                                               Z 8
   38     8
                                                              S
CD CD
     I*
     If   f
                            ill
                            5 S 35
                                      Ocom
                                    5 :i
                                              s

                       I
              •Si *'
                                 t  L8
                                    c8"5
                                                          j—  E
                               15

-------
§136.3
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                                         gg
I
 c
                     CO  GO

                     X  5
                     fe  £
                     I  I
 IT
 ID
 Q
 tu

 8
 cc
 Q.
 i
                            s s
                                             o"

                                             of •
                                     16

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
§136.3
rjeoS c\
ddl 1




5 ' :
1 : !
CD
CO '


i- C\J • i-

cy *" co ^r in
LO in m ui


1-3753-85.


CM
5 : S
CO 00
LL . CQ
OJ CO


o o in
! J j i
washing of re
56 Residue— settleable
Volumetric, (Im
gravimetric
57 Residue — Volatile, n
Gravimetric, 55
58 Rhodium-Total,4 r
lion " followed by
AA direct aspir
                                 17

-------
§136.3
                                            40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
_C

O
                                 ?
                                 N
                                      . i- g
                                       ui B
                                       !?
 8
 oc
 0.
                                                                s
                    CO CO CO    « .•
                    :i£,c.   Q'
                    CO CO CD   <9 <
                    282   8S
                                CD    CD CD CD

                                cy    ^ i- w
                                CO    CO CO CO
                                                        o  iri
                                                        5!  fe
            -  •&  «.    o •
           l*j8lJs-l5f|!!f
                                    2
                                           **i
                                           h- -O ft; Uj o

                                          :|ili§.

                                           a*
                                  18

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                        §136.3
                                                  3  S
f
i   I   i  i   I  I  li

-------
§136.3
                                 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                 111 JI8
                 sg-i 15 .a-o |-s-o«lI||'
                   £
BpiPjSip I

            I



            isK

            fir
lUSi^ialifiTRSf Iss?
__ "3 'c Q *~


*cll|
COD '«
^^-ll^^lp

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
§136.3
                                                   cc
                                                   O
                                                   HI
                                                   Q
                                                   O

                                                   S
                                                   HI
                                                   tx.

                                                   o
                                                   
-------
§136.3
                   40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                      a. a.

                      cj of
?wsi


to «i o>
                                                                                      N   g
                                                                                      CXI   f-
 I



 I



 I
 a
 z
 m

 0.
                           00  00  00   CO

                                                                                i?i  -
                                                                                    «
              5. CD O CD


              g CVJ CM CJ


               10
                                               s   s
            E.   ^-  SjLffiQQtDuCQCDOOuOQCDCO^.   SLcD*0!






                             *0              ^1
                               CD  2'"-02J;5

                                   I  I   t   I  i   $   4
                       .  .   .   o  W   e\i   p>   ^   in

                      f'*COO)^'~^1«—   ^T-
                                           9   «   9
                                           •»   o   •»


                                           5   8i   S
                                               22

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                                                        § 136.3
                                                        ?   ?
   - ™ -  •  -    - •=• _- 5 _- •=• _- 5 _- •=• -- £ _- — -- 5   m   T~   m   ^
            £^.CDOCD   moco SLcooco


                      WCXICM         mT:
                      CO CD CD
                                                                                    O 31. — ^L —
                                                                CQ O O O QOOOO^OC

                                                                  S^cooj S w oj oj \± S o c
                                                                    co (o ptotocococvj Oc
                                    CO

                                    s
                                                        s
                                                        s
                                                    CJ   OJ
                                                    (£>   CD
                                                    i-   O   O   •«-

                                                    T—   1—   T-   O

                                                    CD   CO   CD   (O
s
a
o
^
o

s
                            o
                            c.
                            O


                            Si
o
^1
o
                                            o

                                            9
6
s
01   ™.
c   O




o   e

cy   co
(O   CO
       203-160  D-2
                                              23

-------
§136.3
                                            40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                                            I
        if
                        s
jE'co S 35 c
             £Lco O CQ co   ^  -co —•m t-i m fiJ. m o CD fiL fp o m f^, co o m



             CM          ^"OJCvl      CM      M      04      ^"
 LU
 DC
 ID
 Q
 LU
 O
 O
 o:
 0.
o
€
a
                                              S

                                              f
                                                    I
                                                    Q
                                                                                      I
                                                                                      s
                                            24

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                                 § 136.3
       1
55



CO
    3  tO   (D  5  (O  tD
                                                tO  CD   3
    CO  CO   CO
                     CO      CO
LO   m
CM   CM
CO   CO
                                                                            CO   CO  CO
                                                                            m   ^f  m
                                                                                SCM  CM
                                                                                CO  CO
                                                         CO CO t

                                                         CD CD (O (D CO (O (D C
                         S.
                         °
                                       I
                                       if
                                                                                o  E
                                                          I   s  I
                                          25

-------
§136.3
                                                                           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
                                                                                                 o



                                                                                                 §   ^
                                                                                                 i-   CM
                I
o6o5o5>°oo6oo
f-5'N5:-5^5CN,;tx,-cM

1   tD       tD
,-    CO



£    CO J

CO    (O )




CO Z'CO'j






tD    CD
                                                                                                 CD    CO   CO   CO ~

                                                                                                 O .—.O , — .O ,—,0 '  '
                                                                                                m" ^f CD ^r m"
                                                                         S'" f *
                                                                            CD
                 s
                 s
                        CO CO i-
                   xn    CO CO  .
                   m   i- i- m
                                                                              88
                                                                                          CQ CO CO i-    i-   i-   *-
                                                                                          CO CO CO  -


                                                                                          5 S S CJ    CM   CM   OJ
 §
 Q.
 Q_
 m
           O
           o
                                        §0

                                        CD

                                                                CCI    CO   CO   CO CO   CO
                                                                O    O   O   OU   O   OJCOCM^

                                                                Q,    Q-   Q.   0-0.   0-   »-" CM" i-" 0-
                                                                               jco   -*r   mtor--oo   o    o   o
                                                                               iO   O)   O)O)O)O)   Ol    ^—   *—
                                                                                                               2?
                                                                                                               >,
                                                                                                               £L



                                                                                                          §    cS
                                                         26

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                                                 §136.3
                                          : « j= jc .c « .c .c .c CO   * ^ £ ^
    ^CB^-D^'CO^-D^CO^




    ^* co S 55 "cf 25 o S 2" 55 S 55 ^"   2* 55 o 55 xf S S 35 j^1 S S 35 jj^1 55 S 55 o >—• 2*



    i,CD O CO ^.CO O CD ri CD O CO J~-   ^. CO O CD uCQ O CO £i CO O CO £i CD O CO


    .i-oco_i-oco_T-ooj_£-,i-oco^T-oco^,'-ocom'-ocom£AT-oco
co -r- *-



5 -r- c\j
^- CD (O
c'x

co .2
00 CO W

r*-" N CM"

CO CO i-1"

CM" CM" v-"


  SCO TT

  o o
a


i
                                                         a   a
                         5!  5
                         (O  CO
                                                         o   o
              I   5
              CM"   i-
                                                  1

                                                  f
                                                  o
                                                         1   •
                                                         i   .

                                                         O.


                                                         8  *


                                                         1  |
                                                         17  o
                                                         

                                                         CM  CO
                                                                       s?£f
                                                                       S»:°E

                                                                              s;  11
                                                                              .^ C  •?  (-
                                                                       sill

                                                                       Is*l
                                                                       TS ^ C m
                                                                          8°-  Vc
                                                                              |a i  4

                                                                              CO I "°  ="


                                                                              ?5 s"  V

                                                                              ™m I  =


                                                                              pit


                                                                              si I  I
                                                                                      av

                                                                                      £
                                                                       SSI^

                                                                       jlels
                                                                              i
                                                                              !••
                                                                              sS
                                                                                     -

                                                                          »"  S" -SS
                                                                        ill  l|  lilt
                                           27

-------
§136.3
                                        40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
5 = 8.2
                          •s
          1
              a o. Q. Q. Q. -
              ..... to
             CO  S CO OJ t- N-'

                              o. d. o. a. o. o. o.

                              co" co" co* co~ co" co" co"


                              1111111
                                                  B
                                                  z
)W£
i a.

>

                                                             >|o«:
                                                             . ^z, £.   i
                            Iff
                             z z
                CO
                UJ
                g

                o
                UJ

                Q-



                §
                                                           S
                                                           a
                S
                o
          o
          «
          m m

          ss
          to ^-
          tO (D
                                        CDCDOCDOCDCQCQCD
          O  O   O

          °8  08   °!S







           > CD CO CO CO CD
                        O

                        08

                       . m


                       '8
        8S»
  to c co  =

CO
111


D
UJ

o
a:
a.
a.
                Q


                y
                m
                     I
                                        ooi/^comoOLnao'A      COID    OOLOCOLOCOIO
                                        OCJOCVJOOOOCNJ      OCM    OCMOCMOCV]
                                                                                   coo
                                                                                   C3C5O
          S'S
 ipi  i||
                                 iiii
                                        1
                                  1
                                         Is  I
                                                                            000
                                                      OOOO
        s!
         '
                                                                            DQQ
                     3 S «
                     ?-s s

                     5€-5
                     3QQ
                                           28

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                       §136.3
  S   «^sS
                                 i cicM
                                 J CD Q.
                  Q. . Q. O.  a .  .  .
                   .CO  -  - Q- -CLCOCDC
                  <° m •» <" _- 
-------
§136.3
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 1
 c

 c
 o
 CL

 rr
 O
 13
 Q
 LU


 8
 rr
 Q_

0)
o




CO
<

!•=
Is
!™
5£-o
•55.2
o] ,
ss
«
<
Q_
UJ

1

1
rO
CO
0.


CO
1
o co Z
Tf CO
CO h.
£tt™
«t»
3ff
»«-*
i- 03 f-
O- O. O,
CO CO" CO
CP 0) CD


O)
0)
|C
Q.
co"
I
CO
Q
0
08
CO - CQ CQ
O O O


CQ
1
§m
CM
to
CO
2
O U O O
O O O O



2,4,5-TP (Sllvex)
Terbuthylazme
Toxaphene
Is- CO O)
(O (D (D

0
(^



C
1
H
O
r-
                      „, — u —          -   c



                                            20







a
s.
0

D
C
|
!.
OJ
B
£
^
(u





























CO
o
CO
D




CO
<


wj-D
^UJ
•C -C
"So
5 w
li
? ^~
as
co oo

<
Q.
LU







•a
o
£
0
2








w
E
3
•a
c
Parameter a




CO CO
E 9
TO CD
m in
r^. 01 Is- CD i—
N h- 00
0,0.0.0. o_
O) O> O) O"> O) C3i
CO CO O O O ^
S-* o> o> to in
Ol CO 00 ^" *T
D 5 Q Q Q Q




CQ 0
CD CD CQ ffl £ ^
O O O O O O

CQ CQ
X X
1 1
S o c5 o T-


a> < o> < a) en
c c ,
3 D
8 8
SI - •
J5 ^9
"c H OJ CD (D IT;
881111
i_ i_ o O O s
O 0 0 0 0 g
"t5 "TO "5 "TO "co c
§c c c c o
O O O O i=
C € -E t € «
aaaRi.1
o o o g o ^
a a. a. Q_ Q. a:
S
1 I
S^-sSa
"I^S1??
iiui*
^ i: to CD 0- '51
o. o. ^ ^5 — -S
< < CQ CO -5-
i- oj co ^ in
                                                                         I
                                                                         £
                                                                       E£°

                                                                        "
                                                                       E «
                                      30

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §136.3
          TABLE IF—LIST OF APPROVED METHODS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL POLLUTANTS
Pharmaceuticals pollutants
acetonitnle 	
n-amyl acetate
n-amyl alcohol . .
benzene
n-bulyl-acetate . 	
tert-butyl alcohol . 	
chlorobenzene . ...
chloroform 	
o-dichlorobenzene 	
1 ,2-dichloroethane . 	
diethylamme 	
dimethyl sulfoxide
ethanol . ... 	
ethyl acetate 	 	
n-heptane 	
n-hexane
isobutyraldehyde 	
isopropanol 	
isopropyl acetate
isopropyl ether ... . .
methanol 	
Methyl Cellosolve A 	
methylene chloride 	
methyl formate .. .... . .
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) 	
phenol 	
n-propanol 	
2-propanone (acetone) .. ....
tetrahydrofuran . ....
toluene . . ... 	
tnethlyamme .. 	
xylenes ...
CAS registry No
75-05-8
628-63-7
71-41-0
71-43-2 . . . .
123-86-4 	
75-65-0 	
108-90-7 	
67-66-3 	
95-50-1 .. . .
107-06-2 	
109-89-7 	
67-68-5 	
64-17-5 . 	
141-78-6 	
142-82-5 . . ....
110-54-3 	
78-84-2 	
67-63-0 	
108-21-4 	
108-20-3 	
67-56-1 	
109-86-4 . 	
75-09-2 	
107-31-3 . 	
108-10-1
108-95-2 ..
71-23-8
67-64-1 ...
109-99-9 ...
108-88-3 . . ....
121-44-8 	
(Note 1)
Analytical method number
1666/1 671 /D3371/D3695
1666/D3695
1666/D3695
D4763/D3695/502.2/524 2
1666/D3695.
1666
502 2/524 2
502.2/524.2/551
1625C/5022/5242
03695/502 2/524 2
1666/1671
1666/1671
1666/1 671 /D3695
1666/D3695
1666/D3695
1666/D3695.
1666/1667
1666/D3695
1666/D3695
1666/D3695
1666/1 671 /D3695
1666/1671
502 2/524 2
1666
1624C/1666/D3695/D4763/524 2
D4763
1 666/1 671/D3695
D3695/D4763/524 2
1666/524.2.
D3695/D4763/502 2/524 2
1666/1671.
1624C/1666
 Table 1F note:
 1 1624C. m-xylene 108-38-3, o,p-xylene E-14095 (Not a CAS number, this is the number provided in the Environmental
Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI) database ), 1666 m,p-xylene 136777-61-2, o-xylene 95-47-6
  (b) The full texts of the methods from
the  following  references  which  are
cited in Tables IA, IB, 1C, ID, IE,and IP
are incorporated by reference into this
regulation and  may be obtained from
the sources identified. All costs cited
are  subject  to change  and  must  be
verified  from  the  indicated sources.
The full  texts of all the test procedures
cited are available for inspection at the
National Exposure Research Labora-
tory, Office of Research and Develop-
ment,  U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency,  26 West  Martin Luther King
Dr.,  Cincinnati, OH 45268 and the Na-
tional  Archives and Records  Adminis-
tration  (NARA).  For  information  on
the  availability  of  this material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of ^federal	regu lations/
ibr  locations.html.
   REFERENCES, SOURCES, COSTS, AND
           TABLE CITATIONS:
  (1) The full texts  of Methods 601-613,
624, 625,  1613,  1624, and 1625 are printed
in appendix A of this part 136. The full
text for determining the method detec-
tion limit when using the test proce-
dures is  given  in  appendix B of this
part 136. The full text of Method 200.7 is
printed in appendix C of this  part 136.
Cited in: Table  IB,  Note 5; Table 1C,
Note 2; and Table ID, Note 2.
  (2)  USEPA.   1978.  Microbiological
Methods  for  Monitoring the  Environ-
ment,  Water, and  Wastes.   Environ-
mental  Monitoring and  Support  Lab-
oratory,  U.S. Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. EPA/600/
8-78/017. Available from: National Tech-
nical  Information  Service, 5285  Port
Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161,
Publ. No. PB-290329/AS.  Cost:  $36.95.
Table IA, Note 3.
  (3) "Methods for Chemical Analysis of
Water   and   Wastes,"  U.S.   Environ-
mental  Protection Agency, EPA-600/4-
                                      31

-------
§136.3
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
79-020, March  1979, or  "Methods  for
Chemical  Analysis  of  Water  and
Wastes,"  U.S. Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency, EPA-600/4-79-020, Revised
March 1983. Available from: ORD Publi-
cations,  CBRI,   U.S.   Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati,  Ohio
45268, Table IB, Note 1.
  (4)    "Methods    for    Benzidine,
Chlorinated   Organic   Compounds,
Pentachlorophenol  and  Pesticides  in
Water and Wastewater," U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, 1978. Avail-
able  from:  ORD Publications,  CERI,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy, Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268, Table  1C,
Note 3; Table D, Note 3.
  (5) "Prescribed Procedures for Meas-
urement  of Radioactivity in Drinking
Water," U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency,  EPA-600/4-80-032, 1980.  Avail-
able  from:  ORD Publications,  CBRI,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy, Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268, Table  IE,
Note 1.
  (6) American Public  Health Associa-
tion.   1992,  1995, and   1998. Standard
Methods  for the Examination of Water
and Wastewater. 18th,  19th, and  20th
Edition (respectively).  Available from:
Amer. Publ.  Hlth.  Assoc.,  1015  15th
Street, NW.,  Washington,  DC 20005.
Table IA, Note 4. Tables IB, 1C, ID, IE.
  (7) Ibid, 15th Edition, 1980. Table IB,
Note 30; Table ID.
  (8) Ibid, 14th Edition, 1975. Table IB,
Notes 17 and 27.
  (9) "Selected Analytical Methods Ap-
proved and Cited by the United States
Environmental  Protection  Agency,"
Supplement  to  the  15th  Edition  of
Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater, 1981. Avail-
able from: American Public Health As-
sociation, 1015 Fifteenth Street NW.,
Washington,  DC  20036. Cost available
from   publisher.  Table  IB, Note   10;
Table 1C, Note 6; Table ID, Note 6.
  (10)  Annual Book of  ASTM Stand-
ards,  Water,  and Environmental Tech-
nology, Section 11, Volumes 11.01 and
11.02,  1994, 1996, 1999, and Volume 11.02,
2000 in 40 CPR 136.3, Tables IA, IB, 1C,
ID, and IE.
  (11) USGS.  1989. U.S. Geological Sur-
vey Techniques of Water-Resources In-
vestigations, Book 5, Laboratory Anal-
ysis,  Chapter A4,  Methods  for Collec-
tion and  Analysis of Aquatic Biological
and Microbiological Samples, U.S. Geo-
logical Survey, U.S. Department of the
Interior, Reston,  Virginia.  Available
from: USGS Books and  Open-Pile  Re-
ports  Section,  Federal  Center,  Box
25425,  Denver,  Colorado 80225.  Cost:
$18.00. Table IA, Note 5.
  (12) "Methods for  Determination of
Inorganic  Substances in  Water  and
Fluvial Sediments,"  by  M.J.  Fishman
and Linda  C. Friedman,  Techniques of
Water-Resources Investigations of  the
U.S. Geological Survey, Book 5 Chapter
Al (1989). Available from: U.S. Geologi-
cal Survey, Denver Federal Center, Box
25425, Denver,  CO 80225. Cost:  $108.75
(subject to change). Table IB, Note 2.
  (13) "Methods for  Determination of
Inorganic  Substances in  Water  and
Fluvial Sediments,"  N.W.  Skougstad
and  others,   editors.  Techniques  of
Water-Resources Investigations of  the
U.S. Geological Survey,  Book 5,  Chap-
ter Al (1979). Available from: U.S. Geo-
logical  Survey, Denver Federal Center,
Box 25425, Denver,  CO 80225. Cost: $10.00
(subject to change), Table IB, Note 8.
  (14) "Methods for the Determination
of Organic Substances  in Water  and
Fluvial Sediments," Wershaw, R.L., et
al, Techniques of  Water-Resources In-
vestigations of the U.S. Geological Sur-
vey, Book  5, Chapter A3 (1987). Avail-
able  from: U.S.  Geological  Survey,
Denver Federal Center, Box 25425, Den-
ver,  CO 80225. Cost:  $0.90 (subject to
change). Table IB, Note 24;  Table  ID,
Note 4.
  (15) "Water Temperature—Influential
Factors, Field Measurement and Data
Presentation," by H.H. Stevens, Jr., J.
Ficke, and G.F. Smoot,  Techniques of
Water-Resources Investigations of  the
U.S. Geological Survey,  Book 1,  Chap-
ter Dl,  1975. Available from: U.S. Geo-
logical  Survey, Denver Federal Center,
Box 25425,  Denver, CO 80225. Cost: $1.60
(subject to change). Table IB, Note 32.
  (16) "Selected Methods of the U.S.  Ge-
ological   Survey   of   Analysis   of
Wastewaters,"  by  M.J.  Fishman  and
Eugene Brown; U.S. Geological Survey
Open File Report 76-77 (1976). Available
from: U.S. Geological Survey, Branch
of Distribution, 1200 South Eads Street,
Arlington,  VA 22202.  Cost: $13.50 (sub-
ject to change). Table IE, Note 2.
  (17) "Official Methods  of Analysis of
the  Association of Official Analytical
                                     32

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §136.3
Chemicals", Methods manual, 15th Edi-
tion  (1990).  Price:  $240.00.  Available
from: The Association of Official Ana-
lytical  Chemists, 2200 Wilson  Boule-
vard, Suite 400,  Arlington, VA  22201.
Table IB, Note 3.
  (18) "American National Standard on
Photographic   Processing  Effluents,"
April 2, 1975. Available from: American
National   Standards  Institute,  1430
Broadway,  New York,  New York 10018.
Table IB, Note 9.
  (19) "An  Investigation  of Improved
Procedures for Measurement of Mill Ef-
fluent  and Receiving Water  Color,"
NCASI  Technical Bulletin No. 253, De-
cember 1971. Available from: National
Council of the  Paper Industry for Air
and  Stream Improvements, Inc.,  260
Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016.
Cost  available  from  publisher. Table
IB, Note 18.
  (20) Ammonia,  Automated Electrode
Method, Industrial  Method  Number
379-75WE,  dated  February  19,  1976.
Technicon  Auto  Analyzer II. Method
and price available from Technicon In-
dustrial Systems,  Tarrytown,  New
York 10591. Table IB, Note 7.
  (21) Chemical Oxygen Demand, Meth-
od 8000, Hach Handbook of Water Anal-
ysis, 1979. Method price available from
Hach Chemical Company, P.O. Box 389,
Loveland,  Colorado  80537.  Table  IB,
Note 14.
  (22) QIC  Chemical  Oxygen  Demand
Method, 1978. Method  and price avail-
able from Oceanography International
Corporation, 512 West Loop, P.O. Box
2980,  College  Station,  Texas  77840.
Table IB, Note 13.
  (23)  ORION  Research  Instruction
Manual, Residual Chlorine Electrode
Model 97-70, 1977. Method  and  price
available from  ORION Research Incor-
poration,  840  Memorial  Drive,  Cam-
bridge,  Massachusetts  02138. Table  IB,
Note 16.
  (24) Bicinchoninate Method for Cop-
per.  Method 8506, Hach Handbook  of
Water Analysis, 1979, Method and price
available  from Hach  Chemical  Com-
pany, P.O. Box  300, Loveland, Colorado
80537. Table IB,  Note 19.
  (25) Hydrogen  Ion  (pH) Automated
Electrode Method, Industrial Method
Number 378-75WA. October 1976. Bran &
Luebbe  (Technicon) Auto Analyzer II.
Method and price  available  from Bran
& Luebbe Analyzing Technologies, Inc.
Elmsford, N.Y. 10523. Table IB, Note 21.
  (26)   1,10-Phenanthroline   Method
using FerroVer Iron Reagent for Water,
Hach Method 8008,  1980.  Method and
price available  from  Hach  Chemical
Company, P.O. Box 389 Loveland, Colo-
rado 80537. Table IB, Note 22.
  (27) Periodate  Oxidation Method for
Manganese,  Method 8034, Hach  Hand-
book for Water Analysis,  1979. Method
and  price available  from Hach  Chem-
ical  Company, P.O. Box 389, Loveland,
Colorado 80537. Table IB, Note 23.
  (28) Nitrogen,  Nitrite—Low  Range,
Diazotization  Method for Water and
Wastewater,  Hach  Method 8507, 1979.
Method and price available from Hach
Chemical  Company,  P.O. Box  389,
Loveland, Colorado 80537.  Table  IB,
Note 25.
  (29) Zincon Method for Zinc, Method
8009. Hach Handbook for  Water Anal-
ysis, 1979. Method and price available
from Hach  Chemical  Company, P.O.
Box   389,  Loveland,  Colorado  80537.
Table IB, Note 33.
  (30) "Direct Determination of  Ele-
mental   Phosphorus   by  Gas-Liquid
Chromatography," by R.F. Addison and
R.G.  Ackman,  Journal  of  Chroma-
tography, Volume 47, No. 3, pp. 421-426,
1970. Available in most public libraries.
Back volumes of the Journal  of Chro-
matography   are    available   from
Elsevier/North-Holland, Inc.,  Journal
Information Centre, 52 Vanderbilt Ave-
nue, New York,  NY 10164. Cost avail-
able from publisher. Table IB, Note 28.
  (31) "Direct Current  Plasma  (DCP)
Optical  Emission Spectrometric Meth-
od  for  Trace Elemental  Analysis  of
Water and Wastes", Method ABS 0029,
1986-Revised  1991, Fison  Instruments,
Inc., 32  Commerce Center, Cherry Hill
Drive, Danvers,   MA 01923. Table B,
Note 34.
  (32) "Closed Vessel Microwave  Diges-
tion of Wastewater Samples for Deter-
mination  of Metals,  CEM Corporation,
P.O. Box 200, Matthews, North Carolina
28106-0200, April 16, 1992. Available from
the CEM  Corporation. Table IB, Note
36.
  (33) "Organochlorine Pesticides  and
PCBs in Wastewater Using Empore ™
Disk" Test Method 3M 0222, Revised 10/
28/94. 3M Corporation, 3M Center Build-
ing 220-9E-10,  St. Paul, MN 55144-1000.
                                     33

-------
§136.3
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Method available from 3M Corporation.
Table 1C, Note 8 and Table ID, Note 8.
  (34) USEPA. October 2002.  Methods
for Measuring the Acute Toxicity  of
Effluents  and Receiving  Waters  to
Freshwater   and  Marine  Organisms.
Fifth Edition. U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Office of Water, Wash-
ington, DC EPA 821-R-02-012. Available
from: National Technical Information
Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Spring--
field, Virginia 22161, Pub. No.  PB2002-
108488.  Table IA, Note 29.
  (35) "Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl, Meth-
od PAI-DK01  (Block Digestion, Steam
Distillation,  Titrimetric  Detection)",
revised   12/22/94.   Available   from
Perstorp Analytical Corporation, 9445
SW Ridder Rd., Suite 310, P.O. Box 648,
Wilsonville,  OK 97070. Table IB, Note
39.
  (36) "Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl, Meth-
od PAI-DK02  (Block Digestion, Steam
Distillation, Colorimetric Detection)",
revised   12/22/94.   Available   from
Perstorp Analytical Corporation, 9445
SW Ridder Rd., Suite 310, P.O. Box 648,
Wilsonville,  OK 97070. Table IB, Note
40.
  (37) "Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl, Meth-
od PAI-DK03  (Block Digestion, Auto-
mated  FIA  Gas Diffusion)", revised  12/
22/94. Available from Perstorp  Analyt-
ical  Corporation, 9445 SW  Ridder Rd.,
Suite 310, P.O. Box 648, Wilsonville, OK
97070. Table  IB, Note 41.
  (38)  USEPA.  October  2002.  Short-
Term   Methods  for  Measuring  the
Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Re-
ceiving Waters to  Freshwater  Orga-
nisms.   Fourth Edition. U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency,  Office  of
Water,  Washington,  DC EPA-821-R-02-
013. Available from: National Technical
Information Service, 5285  Port Royal
Road,  Springfield, Virginia 22161,  Pub.
No. PB2002-108489. Table IA, Note 30.
  (39)  USEPA.  October  2002.  Short-
Term   Methods  for  Measuring  the
Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Re-
ceiving Waters to Marine and Estua-
rine Organisms.  Third Edition.  U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Of-
fice  of Water, Washington,  DC  EPA-
821-R-02-014. Available from: National
Technical  Information  Service,  5285
Port Royal  Road,  Springfield, Virginia
22161, Pub. No. PB2002-108490. Table IA,
Note 31.
  (40) EPA Methods 1666, 1667, and 1671
listed in the table above are published
in the compendium titled  Analytical
Methods for the Determination of Pol-
lutants in  Pharmaceutical  Manufac-
turing Industry Wastewaters (EPA 821-
B-98-016). EPA Methods 502.2 and 524.2
have  been incorporated by reference
into 40 CFR 141.24 and are in Methods
for the Determination of Organic Com-
pounds in Drinking Water,  EPA-600/4-
88-039, December  1988,  Revised, July
1991, and  Methods for the Determina-
tion of Organic Compounds in Drinking
Water-Supplement  II,  EPA-600/R-92-
129,  August 1992,  respectively.  These
EPA test method compendia are avail-
able from the National Technical Infor-
mation Service, NTIS PB91-231480 and
PB92-207703, U.S. Department of Com-
merce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Spring-
field, Virginia 22161. The toll-free num-
ber is 800-553-6847. ASTM test methods
D3371, D3695,  and D4763 are available
from the American Society for Testing
and  Materials, 100 Barr Harbor  Drive,
West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
  (41) USEPA. 2002. Method 1631, Revi-
sion E, "Mercury  in Water  by  Oxida-
tion,  Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor
Atomic  Fluorescence   Spectrometry."
September 2002. Office  of Water,  U.S.
Environmental   Protection  Agency
(EPA-821-R-02-019).  Available   from:
National Technical Information Serv-
ice, 5285 Port  Royal Road, Springfield,
Virginia 22161. Publication No. PB2002-
108220. Cost: $25.50 (subject to change).
  (42) [Reserved]
  (43) Method  OIA-1677,  Available Cya-
nide  by Flow Injection,  Ligand Ex-
change,  and   Amperometry.  August
1999. ALPKEM, OI Analytical, Box 648,
Wilsonville, Oregon 97070 (EPA-821-R-
99-013). Available from:  National Tech-
nical  Information Service,  5285 Port
Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
Publication  No.  PB99-132011.   Cost:
$22.50. Table IB, Note 44.
  (44) "Methods of Analysis by the U.S.
Geological  Survey   National  Water
Quality Laboratory  Determination  of
Ammonium Plus Organic Nitrogen by a
Kjeldahl  Digestion  Method and   an
Automated  Photometric  Finish  that
Includes Digest Cleanup by Gas Diffu-
sion",  Open File Report (OFR)  00-170.
                                     34

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §136.3
Available from: U.S.  Geological  Sur-
vey, Denver Federal Center, Box 25425,
Denver, CO 80225. Table IB, Note 45.
  (45) "Methods of Analysis by the  U.S.
Geological  Survey  National  Water
Quality Laboratory—Determination of
Chromium in Water by Graphite  Fur-
nace        Atomic       Absorption
Spectrophotometry", Open File Report
(OFR) 93-^49. Available from: U.S.  Geo-
logical Survey, Denver Federal Center,
Box 25425, Denver,  CO 80225.  Table IB,
Note 46.
  (46) "Methods of Analysis by the  U.S.
Geological  Survey  National  Water
Quality Laboratory—Determination of
Molybdenum in Water  by   Graphite
Furnace     Atomic      Absorption
Spectrophotometry", Open File Report
(OFR) 97-198. Available from: U.S.  Geo-
logical Survey, Denver Federal Center,
Box 25425, Denver,  CO 80225.  Table IB,
Note 47.
  (47) "Methods of Analysis by the  U.S.
Geological  Survey  National  Water
Quality Laboratory—Determination of
Total Phosphorus  by  Kjeldahl  Diges-
tion Method and an Automated Colori-
metric Finish That Includes  Dialysis"
Open File Report (OFR) 92-146. Avail-
able  from:  U.S.  Geological  Survey,
Denver Federal Center, Box 25425, Den-
ver, CO 80225. Table IB, Note 48.
  (48) "Methods of Analysis by the  U.S.
Geological  Survey  National  Water
Quality Laboratory—Determination of
Arsenic and  Selenium in Water  and
Sediment by Graphite  Furnace—Atom-
ic Absorption Spectrometry" Open  File
Report (OFR) 98-639. Table IB, Note 49.
  (49) "Methods of Analysis by the  U.S.
Geological  Survey  National  Water
Quality Laboratory—Determination of
Elements  in    Whole-Water   Digests
Using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Op-
tical  Emission  Spectrometry and In-
ductively Coupled  Plasma-Mass Spec-
trometry" , Open File Report (OFR) 98-
165.  Available  from:  U.S. Geological
Survey, Denver Federal  Center,  Box
25425, Denver, CO 80225. Table IB, Note
50.
  (50) "Methods of Analysis by the  U.S.
Geological  Survey  National  Water
Quality Laboratory—Determination of
Triazine  and   Other  Nitrogen-con-
taining  Compounds by Gas  Chroma-
tography  with  Nitrogen Phosphorus
Detectors" U.S.Geological  Survey Open
File Report 94-37. Available from: U.S.
Geological  Survey,  Denver  Federal
Center, Box 25425,  Denver, CO 80225.
Table ID, Note 9.
  (51) "Methods of Analysis by the U.S.
Geological  Survey  National  Water
Quality Laboratory—Determination  of
Inorganic and Organic Constituents  in
Water and  Fluvial  Sediments", Open
File  Report (OFR) 93-125. Available
from: U.S. Geological Survey, Denver
Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO
80225. Table IB, Note 51; Table 1C, Note
9.
  (52) IDEXX  Laboratories, Inc. 2002.
Description of Colilert®, Colilert-18®",
Quanti-Tray®,      Quanti-Tray®/2000,
Enterolert®  methods  are  available
from IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.,  One
Idexx Drive, Westbrook,  Maine 04092.
Table IA, Notes 17 and 23.
  (53) Hach Company,  Inc. Revision  2,
1999.  Description  of  m-ColiBlue24®
Method, Total Coliforms and E. coli,  is
available from Hach Company, 100 Day-
ton  Ave.,  Ames,  IA 50010. Table IA,
Note 18.
  (54) USEPA. 2002. Method 1103.1: Esch-
erichia coli (E. coli)  in Water by Mem-
brane  Filtration   Using  membrane-
Thermotolerant  Escherichia coli Agar
(mTEC).  U.S.  Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Office of Water,  Wash-
ington D.C. September 2002, EPA-821-
R-02-020. Available  at  NTIS,  PB2003-
100125. Table IA, Note 20.
  (55)  USEPA.  2002.  Method  1106.1:
Enterococci in Water  by  Membrane
Filtration      Using      niembrane-
Enterococcus-Esculin Iron Agar (mE-
EIA). U.S.  Environmental  Protection
Agency,  Office  of Water,  Washington
D.C. September 2002, EPA-821-R-02-021.
Available at NTIS, PB2003-100126. Table
IA, Note 24.
  (56) USEPA. 2002.  Method 1603: Esch-
erichia coli (E. coli)  in Water by Mem-
brane Filtration Using  Modified mem-
brane-Thermotolerant  Escherichia  coli
Agar (Modified mTEC). U.S. Environ-
mental  Protection  Agency, Office  of
Water, Washington,  DC September 2002,
EPA-821-R-02-023. Available at  NTIS,
PB2003-100128. Table IA, Note 21.
  (57) Brenner et al. 1993. New Medium
for  the  Simultaneous  Detection   of
Total Coliforms and Escherichia coli  in
Water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:3534-
                                    35

-------
§136.3
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
3544. Available from the American So-
ciety for  Microbiology,  1752 N  Street
NW., Washing-ton, DC  20036. Table IA,
Note 22.
  (58) USBPA. 2002. Method 1604: Total
Conforms and Escherichia coli (E.  coli)
in Water by Membrane Filtration using
a Simultaneous  Detection  Technique
(MI Medium). U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Office of Water, Wash-
ington D.C.. September 2002, EPA 821-
B-02-024. Available from NTIS, PB2003-
100129. Table IA, Note 22.
  (59)  USEPA.   2002.   Method  1600:
Enterococci in  Water by  Membrane
Filtration      using      membrane-
Enterococcus    Indoxyl-p-D-G-lucoside
Agar  (mEI). U.S.  Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Office of Water, Wash-
ington D.C. September 2002, EPA-821-
R-02-022. Available from NTIS, PB2003-
100127. Table IA, Note 25.
  (60)  USEPA.   2001.   Method  1622:
Cryptospondium in Water by Filtration/
IMS/FA.  U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency,  Office of  Water,  Wash-
ington, DC April 2001, EPA-821-R-01-
026.
  Available from NTIS,  PB2002-108709.
Table IA, Note 26.
  (61)  USEPA.   2001.   Method  1623:
Cryptosporidium and Giardia in  Water
by  Filtration/IMS/FA.  U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Office  of
Water,  Washington,  DC  April 2001,
EPA-821-R-01-025.   Available    from
NTIS, PB2002-108710. Table IA, Note 27.
  (62) AOAC. 1995. Official Methods  of
Analysis of AOAC International,  16th
Edition, Volume  I, Chapter 17.  AOAC
International. 481  North Frederick Av-
enue, Suite 500,  Gaithersburg,  Mary-
land 20877-2417. Table IA, Note 11.
  (c) Under certain circumstances the
Regional Administrator or the Director
in the Region or State where the dis-
charge will occur may determine for a
particular  discharge  that  additional
parameters or pollutants must be re-
ported. Under such circumstances, ad-
ditional test procedures for analysis of
pollutants may be specified by the Re-
gional Administrator,  or the  Director
upon the recommendation of the Direc-
tor of the Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory—Cincinnati.
  (d) Under certain circumstances, the
Administrator may approve, upon rec-
ommendation by  the  Director,  Envi-
ronmental  Monitoring Systems  Lab-
oratory—Cincinnati, additional  alter-
nate  test procedures  for nationwide
use.
  (e) Sample preservation procedures,
container materials, and maximum al-
lowable holding times for parameters
cited  in Tables IA, IB, 1C, ID, and IE
are prescribed in Table II. Any person
may apply for a variance from the pre-
scribed  preservation techniques,  con-
tainer materials, and  maximum hold-
ing times applicable to samples taken
from a specific discharge. Applications
for variances may be  made by  letters
to the Regional Administrator in the
Region  in which the  discharge will
occur.  Sufficient data should  be pro-
vided  to assure such variance  does not
adversely affect  the  integrity  of the
sample. Such data will  be forwarded,
by the Regional Administrator, to the
Director of  the Environmental Moni-
toring   Systems   Laboratory—Cin-
cinnati, Ohio for technical review and
recommendations  for  action  on  the
variance application. Upon receipt of
the recommendations  from the Direc-
tor of the Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory, the Regional Ad-
ministrator  may grant a variance ap-
plicable to the specific  charge  to the
applicant. A  decision  to  approve  or
deny a variance will be made within 90
days of receipt  of the application by
the Regional Administrator.
      TABLE II—REQUIRED CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES, AND HOLDING TIMES
Parameter No /name
Table IA — Bacteria Tests
1-5 Coliform, total, fecal, and E coli

6 Fecal streptococci
7 Enterococci ,
Table IA — Protozoa Tests
8 Cryptosporidium
9 Giardia
Table IA— Aquatic Toxicity Tests
6-10 Toxicity, acute and chronic
Container1

PP, G

PP, G
PP, G

LDPE
LDPE

P,G
Preservation2 3

Cool, <10 °C, 00008%
Na2S2O,5
Cool, <10° 0 0008% Na2S2Ch5
Cool, <10° 0 0008% Na2S2O,'

0-8 °C
0-8 °C

Cool, 4 °C '"
Maximum holding time"

6 hours

6 hours
6 hours

96 hours "
96 hours "

36 hours
                                     36

-------
Environmental  Protection Agency                                                 § 136.3

 TABLE II—REQUIRED CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES, AND HOLDING TIMES—Continued
Parameter No/name

Conti
liner 1

Pres
ervation2-3

Maximum holding time4

Table IB — Inorganic Tests.
1 Acidity .. .
2 Alkalinity .. 	
9 Biochemical oxygen demand
11 Bromide 	
14. Biochemical oxygen demand, carbonaceous
15 Chemtcal oxygen demand 	
16 Chloride
17 Chlorine, total residual 	
21. Color 	 	
23-24. Cyanide, total and amenable to
chlonnation.
25 Fluoride
27. Hardness . . 	
28. Hydrogen ion (pH) .... 	
31 , 43 Kjeldahl and organic nitrogen . ..
Metals '
18. Chromium VI7 	
35 Mercury17 	 	
3, 5-8, 12,13, 19, 20, 22, 26, 29, 30, 32-34,
36, 37, 45, 47, 51, 52, 58-60, 62, 63, 70-72,
74, 75 Metals except boron, chromium VI
and mercury 7.
38 Nitrate
39. Nitrate-nitrite 	
40 Nitrite 	
41 Oil and grease 	
42 Organic Carbon 	
44 Orthophosphate 	
46 Oxygen, Dissolved Probe 	
47 Winkler
48. Phenols .... 	
49 Phosphorus (elemental) 	
50. Phosphorus, total 	
53 Residue total 	
54. Residue, Filterable 	
55. Residue, Nonlilterable (TSS) ..
56 Residue Settleable
57 Residue, volatile . ...
61 Silica 	 ....
64 Specific conductance 	
65 Sulfate 	
66 Sulfide 	
67 Sulfite 	
68. Surfactants 	 .. .
69. Temperature 	
73 Turbidity 	
Table 1C — Organic Tests8
13, 18-20, 22, 24-28, 34-37, 39-43, 45-47,
56, 76, 104, 105, 108-111, 113. Purgeable
Halocarbons
6, 57, 106. Purgeable aromatic hydrocarbons ..
3, 4 Acrolem and acrylonitnle 	
23, 30, 44, 49, 53, 77, 80, 81, 98, 100, 112
Phenols ".
7 38 Benzidmes"
14, 17, 48, 50-52 Phthalate esters" 	
P G
P, G
P G
P, G 	
P PFTE or
Quartz.
P G ...
P, G 	
P, G ....
P G
P, G 	
P, G 	
P, G
p
P, G . . .
P, G . .
P, G
P, G 	
P G .. .
P, G 	
P G
P, G .
p G 	
G
P, G
P G 	
G Bottle and
top
do
G only
G 	
P, G 	
P G ....
P, G
P, G . ...
P G
P, G 	
P, PFTE, or
Quartz.
P, G . ...
P, G 	
P, G 	
P, G 	
P,G
P, G . ...
P, G 	
G, Teflon-
lined sep-
tum
. do ... .
.. do 	
G, Teflon-
lined cap .
do
. do ... .
Cool, 4°C . . .
do 	
Cool 4°C H2S04 to pH<2
Cool, 4°C 	
HNO3 TO pH<2

Cool, 4°C 	
Cool, 4°C, H2SO4 to pH<2
	 do 	
Cool, 4°C 	
Cool, 4°C, NaOH to pH>12,
0 6g ascorbic acid '
HNO3 to pH<2, H2SO4 to pH<2
None required 	
Cool, 4°C, H2SO4 to pH<2 ...
Cool, 4 °C 	
HNO3topH<2
do 	 	
Cool 4°C
Cool, 4°C, H2S04 to pH<2 	
Cool, 4"C 	
Cool to 4°C, HCI or H2SO4 to
pH<2.
Cool to 4 °C HC1 or H2SO4 or
H3PO4, to pH<2
Filter immediately, Cool 4°C
None required 	
Cool, 4°C, H2S04 to pH<2
Cool, 4°C 	
Cool, 4°C, H2SO4 to pH<2 	
Cool, 4°C ..
.do . .. 	
do 	
do
. .do 	
Cool, 4 °C 	
....do 	
. ..do 	
Cool, 4°C add zinc acetate
plus sodtum hydroxide to
pH>9
None required
Cool, 4°C . . 	
None required 	
Cool, 4°C . 	
Cool, 4 °C, 0 008% Na2S2O35
Cool, 4 °C, 0 008% Na2S2O,,5
HCI to PH29
Cool, 4 °C, 0.008% Na2S2O,,5
adjust pH to 4-5'°
Cool, 4 °C, 0.008% Na2SaOj5
do
Cool, 4 °C 	
                                                                                 14 days
                                                                                    Do
                                                                                 28 days
                                                                                 48 hours
                                                                                 6 months

                                                                                 28 days
                                                                                 48 hours
                                                                                 28 days.
                                                                                    Do.
                                                                                 Analyze immediately.
                                                                                 48 hours.
                                                                                 14 days.'

                                                                                 28 days
                                                                                 6 months.
                                                                                 Analyze immediately
                                                                                 28 days

                                                                                 24 hours.
                                                                                 28 days
                                                                                 6 months
                                                                                 48 hours.
                                                                                 28 days
                                                                                 48 hours.
                                                                                 28 days.

                                                                                 28 days.

                                                                                 48 hours.
                                                                                 Analyze immediately

                                                                                 8 hours
                                                                                 28 days.
                                                                                 48 hours
                                                                                 28 days
                                                                                 7 days
                                                                                 7 days
                                                                                 7 days
                                                                                 48 hours
                                                                                 7 days
                                                                                 28 days

                                                                                    Do
                                                                                    Do
                                                                                 7 days
                                                                                 Analyze immediately
                                                                                 48 hours
                                                                                 Analyze.
                                                                                 48 hours.

                                                                                 14 days.
                                                                                    Do.

                                                                                    Do.

                                                                                7 days until extraction,
                                                                                  40 days after extrac-
                                                                                  tion
                                                                                7 days until extraction
                                                                                7 days until extraction,
                                                                                  40 days after extrac-
                                                                                  tion
                                                37

-------
§136.3
40 CFR Ch.  I  (7-1-04 Edition)
  TABLE  II—REQUIRED CONTAINERS, PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES, AND HOLDING TIMES—Continued
Parameter No /name
82-84 Nitrosammes ' ' ' '

88-94 PCBs"
54, 55, 75, 79 Nitroaromatics and
isophorone ' '
1 2, 5, 8-12, 32, 33, 58, 59, 74, 78, 99, 101
Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons11.
1 5, 1 6, 21 , 31 , 87 Haloethers ' ' .
29, 35-37, 63-65, 73, 107 Chlorinated hydro-
carbons ' '
60-62, 66-72, 85, 86, 95-97, 102, 103 CDDs/
CDFs ' '
aqueous, field and lab preservation . . .

Solids, mixed phase, and tissue field preserva-
tion
Soltds, mixed phase, and tissue lab preserva-
tion
Table ID — Pesticides Tests
1-70 Pesticides11 . .
Table IE— Radiological Tests
1-5 Alpha, beta and radium
Container1
do

do
do

do

do .
do .



G .

do

.do


.do

P, G
Preservation 2 3
Cool, 4 °C, 0 008% Na2S2O,,5
store in dark
Cool, 4 °C . .
Cool, 4 °C, 0 008% Na2S2O3,6
store in dark
do

Cool, 4 °C, 0 008% Na?S2O,5
Cool, 4 °C



Cool, 0-4 °C, pH<9, 0008%
Na2S2O,5
Cool, <4 °C

Freeze, <-10 °C


Cool, 4°C, pH 5-9 l5

HNO, to pH<2
Maximum holding time4
Do

Do
Do

Do

Do
Do



1 year

7 days

1 year


Do

6 months
  Table II Notes
  1 Polyethylene  (P) or glass (G)  For microbiology,  plastic sample containers must be made of stenlizable materials (poly-
propylene or other autoolavable plastic)
  2 Sample preservation should be performed immediately upon sample collection  For composite chemical samples each aliquot
should be preserved at the time of collection When use of an automated sampler makes it impossible to preserve each aliquot,
then chemical samples may be preserved by maintaining at 4°C until compositing and sample splitting is completed
  ''When any sample is to be shipped by common carrier or sent through the United States Mails,  it must comply with the De-
partment of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR part 172) The person  offering such material for transpor-
tation is responsible for ensuring such compliance For the preservation requirements of Table II, the Office of Hazardous Mate-
rials, Materials Transportation Bureau, Department of Transportation has determined that the Hazardous  Materials Regulations
do not apply to the following  materials Hydrochloric acid (HCI) in water solutions at concentrations of 0 04% by weight or less
(pH about 1 96 or greater), Nitric acid (HNO3) in water solutions at concentrations of 0 15% by weight or less (pH about 1 62 or
greater),  Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.35% by weight or less (pH about 1  15 or greater), and
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in water solutions at concentrations of 0 080% by weight or less (pH about 12 30 or less)
  4 Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection The times listed are the maximum times that samples may
be held before analysis and still be considered valid Samples may be held for longer periods only if the permittee, or monitoring
laboratory, has data on file to show that for the specific types of samples under study, the analytes are stable for the longer time,
and has  received a variance  from the Regional Administrator under § 136 3(e) Some samples may not be  stable for the max-
imum time period given m the table  A permittee, or monitoring laboratory, is obligated to hold the sample for a shorter time if
knowledge exists to show that this is  necessary to maintain sample stability See § 136 3(e) for details The term "analyze imme-
diately" usually means within  15 minutes or  less of sample collection
  5 Should only be used in the presence  of residual chlorine
  " Maximum holding time is 24 hours when sulfide is  present Optionally all samples may be tested with lead acetate paper be-
fore pH adjustments in order to determine if sulfide is present. If sulfide is present, it can be removed by the addition of cadmium
nitrate  powder until a negative spot test is obtained The sample is filtered and then NaOH is added to pH 12
  7 Samples should be filtered immediately on-site before adding preservative  for dissolved metals
  8 Guidance applies to samples to be analyzed by GC, LC, or GC/MS for specific compounds
  g Sample  receiving no pH adjustment must be analyzed within seven days of sampling
  '"The pH adjustment is not required if acrolein will not be measured  Samples for acrolein  receiving no pH  adjustment must be
analyzed within 3 days of sampling,
  1 i When the extractable analytes of concern tall within a single chemical  category, the specified preservative  and maximum
holding times should  be  observed for optimum safeguard of sample integrity When the analytes of concern fall within two or
more chemical categories, the sample may be preserved  by cooling to 4°C,  reducing residual chlorine with 0 008% sodium
throsulfate, storing in the dark, and adjusting the  pH to 6-9, samples preserved in this manner may be held for seven days be-
fore extraction and for forty days after extraction  Exceptions to this  optional preservation and holding time procedure are noted
in footnote 5 (re the requirement for thiosulfate reduction of residual chlorine), and footnotes 12,  13 (re the analysis of benzi-
dme)
  12 If 1,2-diphenylhydrazine is likely  to be present,  adjust the pH of the sample to 40+02 to  prevent rearrangement to benzi-
dine
  "Extracts may be stored up to 7 days before analysis if storage is conducted under an inert (oxidant-free) atmosphere
  14 For the analysis of diphenylnitrosamine, add 0008% Na2S2O:< and adjust pH to 7-10 with NaOH within 24 hours of sam-
pling
  1 5 The pH adjustment may be performed upon receipt at the laboratory and may be omitted if the samples are extracted within
72 hours of collection  For the analysis of aldnn, add 0 008% Na2S2O,
  16 Sufficient ice  should be placed with the samples  in the shipping container to ensure that ice is still  present when the sam-
ples arrive at the laboratory However, even if ice is present when the samples arrive, it is necessary to immediately measure the
temperature of the samples and confirm that the 4C temperature  maximum has not been exceeded In the isolated cases where
it can be documented that this holding temperature can not be met, the permittee can be given the option of on-site testing or
can request a variance  The  request for a  variance should include  supportive data which show that the toxicity of the effluent
samples  is not reduced because of the increased holding temperature
  17Samples collected for the determination of trace level mercury (100 ng/L) using EPA Method 1631 must be collected in tight-
ly-capped fluoropolymer or glass bottles and preserved with BrCI or HCI solution within 48 hours of sample collection  The time
to  preservation may be extended to 28 days if a sample is oxidized in the sample bottle Samples collected for dissolved trace
level mercury should be  filtered in the laboratory. However, if circumstances  prevent overnight  shipment, samples should be fil-
tered in a designated clean area in the field in  accordance with procedures given in Method  1669  Samples  that  have  been col-
lected for determination of total or dissolved trace level mercury must be analyzed within 90 days of  sample collection
                                                        38

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                §136.5
[38 FR 28758, Oct. 16, 1973, as amended at 41 PR 52781, Dec. 1, 1976; 49 FR 43251, 43258, 43259,
Oct. 26, 1984; 50 FR 691, 692, 695, Jan. 4, 1985; 51 FR 23693, June 30, 1986; 52 FR 33543, Sept. 3,
1987; 55 FR 24534, June 15, 1990; 55 FR 33440, Aug. 15, 1990; 56 FR 50759, Oct. 8, 1991; 57 FR 41833,
Sept. 11, 1992: 58 FR 4505, Jan. 31, 1994; 60 PR 17160,  Apr. 4, 1995; 60 FR 39588, 39590, Aug. 2, 1995;
60 PR 44672, Aug. 28, 1995; 60 FR 53542, 53543, Oct. 16, 1995; 62 FR 48403, 48404, Sept. 15, 1997;
63 FR 50423, Sept. 21, 1998; 64 FR 4978, Feb. 2, 1999;  64 PR 10392, Mar. 4, 1999; 64 FR 26327, May
14, 1999; 64 FR 30433, 30434, June 8, 1999; 64 FR 73423, Deo. 30, 1999; 66 FR 32776, June 18, 2001;
67 FR 65226, Oct. 23, 2002; 67 FR 65886, Oct.  29, 2002;  67 FR 69971, Nov. 19, 2002; 68 FR 43278, July
21, 2003; 68 FR 54934, Sept. 19, 2003; 69 FR 18803, Apr  9, 2004]
§136.4  Application for  alternate  test
    procedures.
  (a) Any person may apply to the Re-
glonal  Administrator in  the  Region
where  the discharge  occurs  for ap-
proval of an alternative test procedure.
  (b) When the discharge for which an
alternative test procedure  is proposed
occurs within  a State having a permit
program approved pursuant to  section
402 of the Act, the applicant shall sub-
mit his application to the Regional Ad-
ministrator through  the  Director  of
the State agency having responsibility
for issuance of NPDES  permits within
such State.
  (c) Unless and until printed  applica-
tion forms  are made  available, an ap-
plication for  an alternate  test proce-
dure may  be  made by letter  in  trip-
licate. Any application for an alternate
test procedure under this paragraph (c)
shall:
  (1) Provide  the name and address  of
the responsible person or firm making
the discharge (if not the applicant) and
the applicable ID number of the exist-
ing or pending permit, issuing agency,
and type of permit for which the alter-
nate test procedure is  requested,  and
the discharge serial number.
  (2) Identify the pollutant or  param-
eter for which approval  of an alternate
testing procedure is being requested.
  (3)  Provide  justification  for using
testing procedures other  than those
specified in Table I.
  (4) Provide  a detailed  description  of
the proposed  alternate test  procedure,
together with references to published
studies of the applicability of the alter-
nate test procedure to the effluents  in
question.
  (d) An application for approval of an
alternate test procedure for nationwide
use may be made by letter in triplicate
to  the  Director, Analytical Methods
Staff, Office of Science and Technology
(4303),  Office  of Water,  U.S. Environ-
mental Protection  Agency, 1200 Penn-
sylvania  Ave.,  NW., Washington,  DC
20460. Any application for an  alternate
test procedure under this paragraph (d)
shall:
  (1) Provide the name and address of
the responsible person or firm making
the application.
  (2) Identify  the  pollutant(s)  or  pa-
rameter^)  for  which nationwide  ap-
proval  of  an alternate  testing proce-
dure is being requested.
  (3) Provide a detailed  description of
the  proposed alternate  procedure,  to-
gether with references to published or
other studies  confirming  the general
applicability of the alternate test pro-
cedure  to  the  pollutant(s)  or  para-
meter^)  in  waste  water  discharges
from representative and specified  in-
dustrial or other categories.
  (4) Provide  comparability  data  for
the performance of the proposed alter-
nate test  procedure compared  to  the
performance of the approved  test pro-
cedures.
[38 FR 28760, Oct. 16, 1973, as amended at 41
FR  52785, Dec. 1, 1976; 62 FR 30763, June 5,
1997]

§ 136.5   Approval of alternate test pro-
    cedures.
  (a) The  Regional Administrator  of
the region in which the  discharge will
occur has final  responsibility for  ap-
proval of any alternate  test procedure
proposed by the responsible person  or
firm making the discharge.
  (b) Within thirty days of receipt of an
application,  the Director will forward
such application proposed by the  re-
sponsible person or firm making the
discharge,   together   with   his  rec-
ommendations, to the Regional Admin-
istrator.  Where  the  Director  rec-
ommends rejection of the application
for   scientific  and technical  reasons
which  he provides,  the  Regional Ad-
ministrator shall deny the  application,
                                       39

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
and shall forward a copy of the rejected
application and his decision to the Di-
rector of the  State  Permit  Program
and to the Director of the Analytical
Methods Staff, Washington, DC.
  (c) Before approving any application
for an  alternate  test  procedure  pro-
posed by the responsible person or firm
making the  discharge, the  Regional
Administrator shall  forward a copy of
the application to the  Director of the
Analytical Methods Staff,  Washington,
DC.
  (d) Within ninety days of receipt by
the Regional Administrator of an ap-
plication  for an  alternate test proce-
dure,  proposed  by the responsible per-
son or firm making  the discharge, the
Regional  Administrator  shall  notify
the  applicant  and  the  appropriate
State agency of approval or rejection,
or shall specify the additional informa-
tion which is  required to determine
whether to approve  the proposed test
procedure. Prior  to  the expiration of
such ninety day period, a recommenda-
tion providing the scientific and other
technical  basis for acceptance or rejec-
tion will be forwarded to  the Regional
Administrator  by the Director of the
Analytical Methods Staff,  Washington,
DC. A copy of all approval and rejec-
tion notifications will be  forwarded to
the Director, Analytical Methods Staff,
Washington, DC, for the purposes of na-
tional coordination.
  (e)  Approval  for nationwide  use. (1)
Within sixty days of the receipt by the
Director  of  the   Analytical  Methods
Staff, Washington, DC, of an applica-
tion for an alternate test procedure for
nationwide use, the Director of the An-
alytical Methods  Staff shall notify the
applicant in writing whether the appli-
cation is complete. If the application is
incomplete, the applicant shall be in-
formed of the information  necessary to
make the application complete.
  (2) Within ninety days of the  receipt
of a complete package, the Analytical
Methods Staff shall  perform any anal-
ysis necessary to determine whether
the alternate method satisfies the ap-
plicable requirements of this part, and
the Director of the Analytical Methods
Staff  shall recommend to the Adminis-
trator that he/she approve  or reject the
application and  shall also notify the
applicant of such  recommendation.
  (3) As  expeditiously as  practicable,
an alternate method determined by the
Administrator to satisfy the applicable
requirements of this part shall be pro-
posed by EPA for incorporation in sub-
section 136.3  of 40 CPR  part 136. EPA
shall make available for review all the
factual bases for its proposal, including
any performance data submitted by the
applicant and any available EPA anal-
ysis of those data.
  (4) Following a period  of public com-
ment,  EPA shall, as expeditiously as
practicable, publish  in  the FEDERAL
REGISTER a final decision to approve or
reject the alternate method.

[38 FR 28760, Oct. 16, 1973, as amended at 41
FR 52785,  Dec. 1, 1976; 55 FR 33440, Aug. 15,
1990; 62 FR 30763, June 5, 1997]

APPENDIX A TO PART 136—METHODS  FOR
   ORGANIC  CHEMICAL   ANALYSIS  OF
   MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WASTE-
   WATER

   METHOD 601—PUEGBABLE HALOCAEBONS

         1. Scope and Application
  1.1  This method covers the determination
of 29 purgeable halocarbons.
  The  following parameters may be deter-
mined by this method:
Parameter
Bromodichloromethane 	

Carbon letrachlonde 	
Chlorobenzene 	 ...
Chloroethane 	 	
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform . . 	
Dibromochloromethane 	
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene 	
1 3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene 	
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane 	
1 ,2-Dichloroethane 	
1,1-Drchloroethane 	
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroelhene 	
1 ,2-Dichloropropane 	
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 	
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 	
Methylene chloride 	
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane . . .
Tetrachloroethene 	
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 	
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 	
Tnchlorofluoromethane 	

STORET
No.
32101
32104
34413
32102
34301
34311
34576
32106
34418
32105
34536
34566
34571
34668
34496
34531
34501
34546
34541
34704
34699
34423
34516
34475
34506
34511
39180
34488
39715

CAS No
75-27-*
75-25-2
74-83-9
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
100-75-8
67-66-3
74-87-3
124-48-1
95-50-1
541-73-1
106-46-7
75-71-8
75-34-3
107-06-2
75-35-4
156-60-5
78-87-5
10061-01-5
10061-02-6
75-09-2
79-34-5
127-18-4
71-55-6
79-00-5
79-01-6
75-69-4
75-01-4

                                     40

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
  1.2  This is a purge and trap gas chroma-
tographic (G-C) method applicable to the de-
termination of the compounds listed above
in municipal  and industrial discharges  as
provided under 40 CFR 136.1. When this meth-
od is used to analyze unfamiliar samples for
any  or all  of the  compounds above,  com-
pound identifications should be supported by
at least  one  additional  qualitative  tech-
nique. This method describes analytical con-
ditions  for  a second gas chromatographic
column that can be used to confirm measure-
ments made with the primary column. Meth-
od  624   provides  gas  chromatograph/mass
spectrometer  (GC/MS)   conditions  appro-
priate  for the qualitative and quantitative
confirmation of results for most of the pa-
rameters listed above.
  1.3  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined in  Section 12.1)' for each parameter is
listed in Table  1. The  MDL for a  specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending  upon the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.4  Any modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered  as a major modification subject  to
application  and approval  of alternate  test
procedures under 40 CPR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.5  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the supervision  of  analysts  experi-
enced in the operation of a purge and  trap
system  and  a gas chromatograph and in the
interpretation of gas chromatograms.  Each
analyst must demonstrate the ability to gen-
erate acceptable results  with this  method
using the procedure described in Section 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method
  2.1 An inert gas is bubbled through a 5-mL
water sample contained  in a specially-de-
signed purging chamber at ambient tempera-
ture. The halocarbons are efficiently trans-
ferred from  the  aqueous  phase to the vapor
phase. The vapor is swept through a sorbent
trap  where  the  halocarbons are  trapped
After purging is completed, the trap is heat-
ed and  backflushed  with  the inert gas  to
desorb   the  halocarbons  onto   a   gas
chromatographic  column.  The  gas  chro-
matograph is temperature programmed  to
separate the halocarbons which are then de-
tected with a halide-specific detector.2 3
  2.2 The method provides an optional gas
chromatographic column that may be  help-
ful in resolving the compounds  of interest
from interferences that may occur.

              3. Interferences
  3.1  Impurities  in  the  purge gas and or-
ganic compounds outgassing from the plumb-
ing ahead of the trap account for the major-
ity of contamination problems. The  analyt-
ical system must be  demonstrated to be free
from contamination  under the conditions of
the analysis by  running  laboratory reagent
blanks as described in Section 8.1.3. The use
of  non-Teflon  plastic tubing,  non-Teflon
thread sealants, or flow controllers with rub-
ber components in the purge and trap system
should be avoided.
  3.2  Samples can be contaminated by diffu-
sion of volatile organics (particularly fluoro-
carbons and methylene chloride) through the
septum seal ilto the sample during shipment
and storage. A field reagent  blank prepared
from reagent water and carried through the
sampling and handling protocol can serve as
a check on such contamination.
  3.3  Contamination   by  carry-over   can
occur whenever high level and low level sam-
ples are sequentially analyzed. To reduce
carry-over,  the purging  device and sample
syringe must be  rinsed with reagent  water
between  sample analyses.  Whenever an  un-
usually concentrated  sample  is encountered,
it should be followed by an analysis of rea-
gent water to check for cross contamination.
For samples containing  large  amounts of
water-soluble materials,  suspended solids,
high boiling compounds or high organohalide
levels, it may be  necessary to wash out the
purging  device with  a detergent solution,
rinse it with distilled water,  and then  dry it
in a 105°C oven between analyses. The trap
and other parts of the system  are also sub-
ject to contamination; therefore,  frequent
bakeout  and purging  of the entire system
may be required.

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity  of
each reagent used  in this method has  not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. From this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The  laboratory is  responsible for
maintaining a current  awareness  file  of
OSHA  regulations regarding the safe han-
dling of the  chemicals specified  in this meth-
od. A reference  file of material data handling
sheets should also be made available  to all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional references  to  laboratory safety
are available and have been identified4^6 for
the information of the analyst.
  4.2  The following parameters  covered by
this method have been tentatively classified
as known or suspected, human or mamma-
lian carcinogens,  carbon tetrachloride,  chlo-
roform, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and  vinyl  chlo-
ride. Primary standards of these toxic  com-
pounds  should  be prepared  in  a hood.  A
NIOSH/MBSA approved toxic gas respirator
should be worn when the analyst handles
high  concentrations  of these  toxic  com-
pounds.
                                          41

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 601
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
         5. Apparatus and Materials
  5.1  Sampling equipment, for discrete sam-
pling.
  5.1.1  Vial—25-mL   capacity  or   larger,
equipped with a screw cap with a hole in the
center (Pierce  #13075 or equivalent). Deter-
gent wash, rinse with tap and distilled water,
and dry at 105 °C before use.
  5.1.2  Septum—Teflon-faced        silicone
(Pierce  #12722  or  equivalent).  Detergent
wash, rinse with tap and distilled water, and
dry at 105 °C for 1 h before use.
  5.2  Purge and trap system—The purge and
trap system consists of three separate pieces
of equipment:  a  purging device,  trap,  and
desorber.  Several complete systems  are now
commercially available.
  5.2.1  The purging device must be designed
to accept 5-mL samples with a water column
at least 3 cm deep. The gaseous head space
between the water column and the trap must
have a total volume of less than 15 mL. The
purge gas must pass  through  the water col-
umn as finely divided bubbles with a diame-
ter of less than  3 mm  at  the origin.  The
purge gas must be introduced no more than
5 mm  from the base of the water  column.
The  purging device  illustrated in Figure 1
meets these design criteria.
  5.2.2  The trap must be at least 25 cm long
and have an inside diameter of at least 0.105
in. The trap  must be packed to contain the
following minimum lengths of adsorbents: 1.0
cm of  methyl silicone coated packing (Sec-
tion 6.3.3), 7.7  cm  of 2,6-diphenylene oxide
polymer  (Section 6.3.2), 7.7  cm  of silica gel
(Section  6.3.4), 7.7  cm  of coconut charcoal
(Section  6.3.1).  If it is not necessary to ana-
lyze for  dichlorodifluoromethane, the char-
coal can  be eliminated, and the polymer sec-
tion lengthened  to  15 cm.  The  minimum
specifications for the trap are illustrated in
Figure 2.
  5.2.3  The desorber must be capable of rap-
idly heating the trap to 180 °C. The  polymer
section of the trap  should not be heated
higher than  180 °C and the remaining  sec-
tions should not exceed 200  °C. The  desorber
illustrated in Figure 2 meets these design
criteria.
  5.2.4  The  purge and trap system may be
assembled as a separate unit or be coupled to
a gas chromatograph as  illustrated in Fig-
ures 3 and 4.
  5.3  Gas   chromatograph—An   analytical
system complete  with a temperature pro-
grammable gas chromatograph suitable for
on-column injection and  all required acces-
sories  including  syringes,  analytical  col-
umns,  gases,  detector, and strip-chart re-
corder. A data system is recommended for
measuring peak areas.
  5.3.1  Column 1—8 ft long x 0.1 in. ID stain-
less  steel or glass, packed with 1% SP-1000
on Carbopack B  (60/80 mesh)  or equivalent.
This column was  used to develop the method
performance   statements  in  Section   12.
Guidelines for the  use of alternate column
packings are provided in Section 10.1.
  5.3.2  Column 2—6 ft long x 0.1 in. ID stain-
less steel or  glass, packed with  chemically
bonded n-octane on Porasil-C (100/120 mesh)
or equivalent.
  5.3.3  Detector—Electrolytic  conductivity
or microcoulometric detector. These types of
detectors have proven effective in the anal-
ysis of wastewaters for the parameters listed
in the scope  (Section 1.1). The electrolytic
conductivity  detector was used  to develop
the method performance statements  in Sec-
tion  12. Guidelines for the use of alternate
detectors are provided in Section 10.1.
  5.4  Syringes—5-mL glass hypodermic with
Luerlok  tip (two each), if applicable to the
purging device.
  5.5  Micro syringes—25-nL, 0.006 in.  ID nee-
dle.
  5.6  Syringe valve—2-way, with  Luer ends
(three each).
  5.7  Syringe—5-mL, gas-tight with shut-off
valve.
  5.8  Bottle—15-mL,  screw-cap, with Teflon
cap liner.
  5.9  Balance—Analytical, capable of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.

                6. Reagents

  6.1  Reagent water—Reagent water is de-
fined as  a water  in which an interferent is
not observed  at the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.1.1  Reagent water can be  generated by
passing tap water through a carbon filter bed
containing about  1 Ib of activated  carbon
(Filtrasorb-300, Calgon Corp., or equivalent).
  6.1.2  A   water    purification    system
(Millipore  Super-Q or equivalent) may be
used to generate reagent water.
  6.1.3  Reagent water may also be prepared
by boiling water for  15 min. Subsequently,
while maintaining the temperature at 90 °C,
bubble a contaminant-free inert gas through
the water for 1 h.  While still  hot, transfer
the water to  a narrow mouth screw-cap bot-
tle and seal with a Teflon-lined septum and
cap.
  6.2  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.3  Trap Materials:
  6.3.1  Coconut charcoal—6/10 mesh sieved
to 26 mesh, Barnabey Cheney, CA-580-26 lot #
M-2649 or equivalent.
  6.3.2  2,6-Diphenylene   oxide   polymer—
Tenax, (60/80  mesh), chromatographic grade
or equivalent.
  6.3.3  Methyl silicone packing—3% OV-1 on
Chromosorb-W (60/80 mesh) or equivalent.
  6.3.4  Silica  gel—35/60  mesh,   Davison,
grade-15  or equivalent.
  6.4  Methanol—Pesticide quality or equiv-
alent.
  6.5  Stock    standard   solutions—Stock
standard  solutions may  be prepared  from
                                          42

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A.Meth. 601
pure standard materials or purchased as cer-
tified solutions. Prepare stock standard solu-
tions in methanol using  assayed liquids or
gases as appropriate. Because of the toxicity
of some of the organohalides, primary dilu-
tions of these materials should be prepared
in a hood. A NIOSH/MBSA approved  toxic
gas respirator should be used when the ana-
lyst handles high concentrations of such ma-
terials.
  6.5.1   Place about  9.8 mL of methanol into
a 10-mL ground glass stoppered volumetric
flask. Allow the flask  to stand, unstoppered,
for about 10 min or until all alcohol wetted
surfaces have dried. Weigh the flask to the
learest 0.1 mg.
  6.5.2   Add the assayed reference material:
  6.5.2.1  Liquid—Using a 100 |iL syringe, im-
mediately add two or  more drops of assayed
reference material  to the flask,  then re-
weigh. Be sure  that the  drops fall  directly
into the alcohol without contacting the neck
of the flask.
  6.5.2.2  Gases—To  prepare standards for
any of the six halocarbons that boil below
30 °C (bromomethane,  chloroethane,  chloro-
methane,         dichlorodifluoromethane,
trichlorofluoromethane, vinyl chloride), fill
a 5-mL valved gas-tight syringe with the ref-
erence standard to the 5.0-mL  mark. Lower
the needle to 5 mm  above the methanol me-
niscus. Slowly introduce the reference stand-
ard above the surface of the liquid (the heavy
gas will rapidly dissolve into the methanol).
  6.5.3   Reweigh, dilute to volume,  stopper,
then  mix  by  inverting  the flask  several
times.  Calculate the concentration in ng/|iL
from the net gain in weight. When compound
purity is assayed to be 96% or greater, the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate  the concentration of the stock stand-
ard. Commercially prepared stock standards
can be used at any concentration if they are
certified by the malufacturer or by an  inde-
pendent source.
  6.5.4   Transfer the stock standard solution
into a  Teflon-sealed screw-cap bottle. Store,
with minimal headspace, at -10 to  -20 °C
and protect from light.
  6.5.5   Prepare  fresh  standards weekly for
the six gases and 2-chloroethylvinyl ether.
All other standards must  be replaced  after
one month,  or  sooner if  comparison  with
check standards indicates a problem.
  6.6  Secondary dilution  standards—Using
stock standard solutions,  prepare secondary
dilution standards in methanol that contain
the compounds of interest, either singly or
mixed   together.  The secondary  dilution
standards should be prepared at concentra-
tions   such  that  the  aqueous  calibration
standards prepared  in Section 7.3.1 or 7.4.1
will bracket  the working range of the ana-
lytical system. Secondary dilution standards
should be stored with minimal headspace and
should  be checked  frequently for signs of
degradation or evaporation, especially just
prior to preparing calibration standards from
them.
  6.7  Quality  control  check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration
  7.1  Assemble a purge and trap system that
meets the specifications in  Section 5.2. Con-
dition  the  trap overnight at  180  °C  by
backflushing with  an inert gas flow of at
least 20 mL/min. Condition the  trap for 10
min once daily prior to use.
  7.2  Connect  the purge and trap system to
a   gas   chromatograph.   The   gas  chro-
matograph must be operated using tempera-
ture and flow rate  conditions equivalent to
those given in Table 1. Calibrate the purge
and trap-gas chromatographic system using
either the external  standard technique  (Sec-
tion 7.3) or the internal standard technique
(Section 7.4).
  7.3  External standard  calibration proce-
dure:
  7.3.1  Prepare calibration standards  at  a
minimum of three  concentration levels for
each parameter by carefully adding 20.0 (iL of
one or more secondary dilution standards to
100, 500, or 1000 (iL of reagent water. A 25-fiL
syringe with a 0.006 in. ID needle should be
used for this operation. One of the external
standards should be at a concentration near,
but above, the MDL (Table 1) and the other
concentrations should correspond to the ex-
pected range of concentrations found in real
samples or should define  the working range
of the detector. These aqueous standards can
be stored up to 24  h, if held in sealed  vials
with zero headspace as described in Section
9.2. If not so stored, they must be discarded
after 1 h.
  7.3.2  Analyze each  calibration  standard
according to Section 10,  and  tabulate  peak
height or  area responses  versus the  con-
centration in the standard. The results can
be  used to  prepare  a  calibration curve for
each compound. Alternatively, if the ratio of
response to concentration  (calibration fac-
tor) is a  constant  over the working  range
(<10% relative standard deviation, RSD), lin-
earity  through the  origin  can  be assumed
and the average  ratio or calibration factor
can be used in place of a calibration curve.
  7.4  Internal  standard  calibration  proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select one or more internal standards that
are similar in analytical behavior to  the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate that  the  measurement of
the  internal  standard is not  affected by
method or matrix interferences.  Because of
these limitations, no internal standard can
be suggested that is applicable to all  sam-
ples. The compounds recommended for use as
surrogate spikes in Section 8.7 have  been
used successfully as internal standards, be-
cause of  their generally  unique retention
times.
                                          43

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 601
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  7.4.1  Prepare  calibration standards at  a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each parameter of interest as described in
Section 7.3.1.
  7.4.2  Prepare  a  spiking  solution  con-
taining each of the internal standards using
the procedures described in Sections 6.5  and
6.6. It is recommended that the secondary di-
lution  standard be prepared at a concentra-
tion of 15 |ig/mL  of each internal standard
compound.  The addition of 10  jxL of this
standard to 5.0 mL of sample or calibration
standard would be  equivalent to 30 ng/L.
  7.4.3  Analyze  each calibration  standard
according to Section 10, adding 10 uL of in-
ternal  standard spiking solution directly to
the syringe (Section 10.4).  Tabulate peak
height or area responses against concentra-
tion for each compound and internal stand-
ard, and  calculate response factors (RF) for
each compound using Equation 1.
                   (Ais)(Cs)
                                Equation 1
where:
A5=Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,9=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration of the internal standard.
Cs=Concentration  of  the parameter to  be
  measured.
If the RF value over the working range is a
constant (<10% RSD), the RF can be assumed
to be invariant and the  average RF can  be
used for calculations. Alternatively, the re-
sults can be used to plot a calibration curve
of response ratios, A.JA,,,  vs. RF.
  7.5  The  working calibration curve,  cali-
bration factor,  or  RF must be  verified  on
each working day by the measurement of a
QC check sample.
  7.5.1   Prepare the QC check sample as de-
scribed in Section 8.2.2.
  7.5.2   Analyze the QC check sample accord-
ing to Section 10.
  7.5.3   For each parameter, compare the re-
sponse  (Q) with the  corresponding  calibra-
tion acceptance criteria  found in Table 2. If
the responses for all  parameters of  interest
fall within the designated ranges, analysis of
actual samples can begin. If any individual Q
falls outside the range, proceed according to
Section 7.5.4.
  NOTE: The  large number of  parameters in
Table  2 present a  substantial  probability
that one or more will not meet the  calibra-
tion acceptance criteria when all parameters
are analyzed.
  7.5.4   Repeat the test  only  for those pa-
rameters that failed to meet the calibration
acceptance criteria. If the response for a pa-
rameter does not fall within  the range  in
this second test,  a new calibration curve,
calibration factor, or RF must be prepared
for that parameter according to Section 7.3
or 7.4.

             8. Quality Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of spiked samples  to evaluate and
document data quality. The laboratory must
maintain records to document the  quality of
data that  is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks are compared with  established per-
formance  criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics  of the method. When results of sample
spikes indicate  atypical method  perform-
ance,  a quality control check standard must
be  analyzed to  confirm  that the measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1 The  analyst must  make an initial,
one-time,  demonstration  of the ability  to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2 In recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the  analyst is
permitted certain options  (detailed in Sec-
tion 10.1) to improve the separations or lower
the cost of measurements. Each time such a
modification is made to the method, the ana-
lyst is required  to repeat  the procedure in
Section 8.2.
  8.1.3 Each day, the analyst must analyze a
reagent water blank to  demonstrate  that
interferences from the analytical system are
under control.
  8.1.4 The laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, spike  and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5 The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate  through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4. The  frequency  of the  check  standard
analyses is equivalent to 10% of all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from samples (Section 8.3) meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6 The  laboratory  must maintain per-
formance  records to document the  quality of
data that  is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish the  ability to generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1 A  quality control (QC)  check sample
concentrate is required containing each pa-
rameter of interest at a  concentration of 10
|j.g/mL in  methanol.  The QC check sample
concentrate must be obtained from the U.S.
                                          44

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
Environmental Protection Agency, Environ-
mental Monitoring and Support  Laboratory
in Cincinnati, Ohio, if available. If not avail-
able from that source, the QC check sample
concentrate must be  obtained from another
external source. If not available  from either
source  above,  the QC check  sample con-
centrate must be prepared by the laboratory
using  stock standards prepared independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2  Prepare a QC check sample to con-
tain 20 ug/L of each parameter by adding 200
HL of QC check sample concentrate to 100 mL
of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze four  5-mL aliquots of the
well-mixed  QC check sample according  to
Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the average recovery (X) in
jig/L, and the standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in ng/L, for each parameter of in-
terest using the four results.
  8.2.5  For each parameter compare s and X
with the corresponding acceptance criteria
for  precision  and accuracy,  respectively,
found  in Table 2.  If s and X for all param-
eters of interest  meet the acceptance cri-
teria, the system  performance is acceptable
and  analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any  individual s exceeds the precision  limit
or any individual X falls outside the range
for accuracy, then the system performance is
unacceptable for that parameter.
  NOTE: The large number of parameters in
Table  2 present   a substantial  probability
that one or more  will fail at least one of the
acceptance criteria when  all parameters are
analyzed.
  8.2.6  When one or more of the parameters
tested fail at least one of the acceptance cri-
teria, the analyst must proceed according to
Section 8.2.6.1 or 8.2.6.2.
  8.2.6.1  Locate and  correct the source  of
the problem and  repeat the test for all pa-
rameters of interest beginning with Section
8.2.3.
  8.2.6.2  Beginning with Section 8.2.3, repeat
the  test  only for those parameters  that
failed  to meet criteria.  Repeated failure,
however,  will  confirm a general  problem
with the measurement system. If this occurs,
locate and correct the source of the problem
and repeat the test for all compounds of in-
terest beginning with Section 8.2.3.
  8.3  The  laboratory  must, on an  ongoing
basis, spike at least 10% of the samples from
each sample site  being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing one to
ten samples per month, at least one spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1 The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If, as in compliance  monitoring,
the concentration of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit,  the spike should
be at that  limit or 1 to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the  concentration of a specific
parameter in  the  sample  is  not  being
checked against a limit specific  to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be  at 20 ug/L or 1
to 5 times higher than the  background con-
centration  determined in  Section 8.3.2,
whichever concentration would be larger.
  8.3.2  Analyze  one  5-mL sample aliquot to
determine the background concentration (B)
of each  parameter.  If necessary, prepare  a
new QC  check sample concentrate (Section
8.2.1) appropriate  for  the  background con-
centrations in the sample. Spike a second 5-
mL  sample  aliquot  with 10  uL of the QC
check sample concentrate and analyze it to
determine the  concentration  after spiking
(A) of each  parameter. Calculate each per-
cent recovery (P) as  100(A-B)%/T, where T is
the known true value of the  spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the  percent recovery (P) for
each  parameter  with the corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 2. These
acceptance criteria  were calculated to in-
clude an allowance for error in measurement
of both the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming  a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent  that  the analyst's  spike  to  back-
ground  ratio approaches 5:1.7  If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than 20
ug/L,  the analyst must use either the QC ac-
ceptance criteria in  Table 2, or optional QC
acceptance criteria  calculated for the spe-
cific spike concentration.  To  calculate  op-
tional acceptance criteria for the recovery of
a  parameter: (1)  Calculate  accuracy (X')
using the equation in Table 3, substituting
the spike concentration (T)  for C; (2) cal-
culate overall precision (S') using the equa-
tion in Table 3, substituting X' for X;  (3) cal-
culate the range for recovery at the spike
concentration as (100 X7T)±2.44(100 S'/T)%.7
  8.3.4  If any individual P  falls outside the
designated range for recovery, that param-
eter has  failed  the  acceptance  criteria. A
check  standard  containing  each parameter
that failed the criteria must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any  parameter fails the acceptance
criteria  for  recovery  in Section  8.3, a QC
check  standard  containing  each parameter
that failed must  be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard  will depend upon
the number  of  parameters being simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance  of the labora-
tory. If the entire list of parameters in Table
2 must be measured in the sample in Section
8.3, the probability that the analysis of a QC
check standard will  be required is high. In
this case the QC check standard should be
routinely analyzed with the  spiked sample.
  8.4.1 Prepare  the  QC check standard by
adding 10 nL of QC check sample concentrate
                                          45

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 601
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
(Section 8.2.1  or 8.3.2) to 5  mL of reagent
water. The QC check standard needs only to
contain the parameters  that failed criteria
in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2 Analyze  the QC  check  standard  to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each  parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3 Compare  the percent recovery (Ps)
for each parameter with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 2. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need  to be compared with these criteria. If
the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
side the  designated range,  the laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control, and the problem must  be
immediately identified and  corrected. The
analytical result for that parameter in the
unspiked sample is suspect and may not  be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,  method  accuracy for wastewater
samples must be assessed and records must
be  maintained.  After  the analysis of five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate  the  average percent recovery (P)
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy ass_essment
as a percent recovery interval from P — 2Sp to
P+2Sp. If p=90% and Sp=10%, for example, the
accuracy  interval is expressed as 70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on a regular basis (e.g. after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6  It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this method. The specific prac-
tices  that are most productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates may be ana-
lyzed to assess the precision  of the environ-
mental measurements. When  doubt  exists
over the identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas chromatography with a  dissimilar col-
umn,  specific  element  detector,  or mass
spectrometer must be used.  Whenever pos-
sible, the laboratory should analyze standard
reference  materials and participate  in rel-
evant performance evaluation studies.
  8.7  The analyst should monitor both the
performance of  the analytical  system and
the effectiveness of the method in dealing
with  each sample  matrix by spiking  each
sample, standard, and reagent water  blank
with  surrogate halocarbons.  A combination
of     bromochloromethane,     2-bromo-l-
chloropropane, and 1,4-dichlorobutane is rec-
ommended to encompass the range of the
temperature program used in  this method.
From stock standard solutions prepared  as
in Section 6.5, add a volume to give 750 p.g of
each  surrogate  to  45 mL  of reagent  water
contained in a 50-mL volumetric flask, mix
and dilute to volume for a concentration of
15 ng/uL. Add 10 |iL of this surrogate spiking
solution directly into the 5-mL syringe with
every sample  and  reference standard ana-
lyzed. Prepare a fresh surrogate spiking solu-
tion on  a weekly basis. If the internal stand-
ard calibration procedure is being used,  the
surrogate compounds may be added directly
to  the  internal standard  spiking  solution
(Section 7.4.2).

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                Handling

  9.1  All  samples  must be  iced or  refrig-
erated from the time of collection until anal-
ysis. If the sample  contains free or combined
chlorine,  add  sodium  thiosulfate preserva-
tive (10 mg/40 mL  is sufficient for up to 5
ppm Ch)  to the empty  sample bottle just
prior to shipping to the  sampling site. EPA
Methods 330.4  and 330.5 may  be used  for
measurement of residual  chlorine.8 Field test
kits are available for this purpose.
  9.2  Grab  samples must be  collected  in
glass containers having a total volume of at
least 25 mL. Fill the sample bottle just to
overflowing in such a manner that  no  air
bubbles pass through the sample as the bot-
tle  is being filled. Seal the bottle so that no
air  bubbles are entrapped in it. If preserva-
tive has been  added, shake vigorously for 1
min. Maintain the hermetic seal on the sam-
ple  bottle until time of analysis.
  9.3  All  samples  must  be analyzed  within
14 days of collection.3

               10. Procedure
  10.1 Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions  for  the  gas  chro-
matograph. Included in  this table are esti-
mated retention times and MEL that can be
achieved under these conditions. An example
of the separations  achieved by Column 1 is
shown  in  Figure  5. Other  packed columns,
chromatographic  conditions,  or  detectors
may be used if the requirements of Section
8.2 are met.
  10.2 Calibrate the system  daily  as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  10.3 Adjust  the purge  gas (nitrogen or he-
lium) flow rate to 40 mL/min. Attach  the
trap inlet to the purging device, and set  the
purge and trap system to purge  (Figure  3).
Open the syringe valve located on the purg-
ing device sample introduction needle.
  10.4 Allow the sample to come to ambient
temperature prior  to introducing it  to  the
syringe. Remove the-plunger from a 5-mL sy-
ringe and attach a closed syringe valve. Open
the sample bottle (or standard)  and carefully
pour the sample into  the syringe barrel to
]ust short of  overflowing. Replace  the  sy-
ringe plunger and compress the  sample. Open
the syringe valve and  vent any residual air
while adjusting the sample volume to 5.0 mL.
Since this process  of taking an aliquot  de-
stroys the validity of  the sample for future
                                          46

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
analysis, the analyst should fill a second sy-
ringe at this time to protect against possible
loss of data.  Add 10.0 nL of the surrogate
spiking solution (Section 8.7) and 10.0 nL of
the internal standard spiking solution (Sec-
tion 7.4.2), if applicable,  through the valve
bore, then close the valve.
  10.5  Attach the syringe-syringe valve as-
sembly to the syringe valve on the purging
device. Open the syringe valves and inject
the sample into the purging chamber.
  10.6  Close both valves and purge the sam-
ple for 11.0±0.1 min at ambient temperature.
  10.7  After the 11-min  purge time, attach
the  trap to the chromatograph, adjust  the
purge  and  trap system to the desorb mode
(Figure 4),  and begin to  temperature pro-
gram the gas chromatograph. Introduce  the
trapped materials to the GC column by rap-
idly  heating the  trap  to  180  °C  while
backflushing the trap with an inert gas be-
tween 20 and 60 mL/min for 4 min.  If rapid
heating of the trap cannot be achieved,  the
GC column must be used as a secondary trap
by cooling it to 30  °C (subambient tempera-
ture, if poor peak geometry or random reten-
tion time problems persist) instead of  the
initial program temperature of 45 °C
  10.8  While the trap is being desorbed into
the gas chromatograph,  empty the  purging
chamber using the sample introduction sy-
ringe.  Wash the  chamber  with two  5-mL
flushes of reagent water.
  10.9  After desorbing the sample for 4 min,
recondition  the trap by returning the purge
and trap system to the purge mode. Wait 15
s then close the syringe valve on the purging
device to begin gas flow through the trap.
The trap temperature should  be maintained
at 180 °C After approximately 7 min, turn off
the trap heater and open the syringe valve to
stop the gas flow through the trap. When the
trap is cool, the next sample can  be ana-
lyzed.
  10.10  Identify the parameters in the sam-
ple by comparing the retention times of the
peaks  in the sample chromatogram with
those    of    the    peaks    in    standard
chromatograms. The width of the retention
time  window  used  to  make identifications
should be based upon  measurements of ac-
tual retention time variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three times  the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound can be  used to calculate a sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the analyst should weigh heavily in  the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  10.11 If the response for a peak  exceeds
the working range of the system,  prepare  a
dilution  of  the sample  with reagent water
from  the aliquot in the second syringe and
reanalyze.

              11. Calculations
  11.1  Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  11.1.1  If the external standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion of  the parameter being measured from
the  peak  response  using  the  calibration
curve or  calibration factor determined  in
Section 7.3.2.
  11.1.2  If the internal standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined in  Section 7.4.3 and Equa-
tion 2.
                                Equation 2
    Concentration ((J-g/L) =
(As)(Cis)
(Aj(RF)
where:
As=Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A«=Response for the internal standard.
Cls=Concentration of the internal standard.
  11.2  Report results in ng/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

           12. Method Performance

  12.1 The  method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as  the minimum concentration of  a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.*  The MDL   concentration  listed in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.".
Similar   results   were   achieved  using
representative wastewaters. The MDL actu-
ally achieved in a  given  analysis will vary
depending on instrument sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  12.2  This method is recommended for  use
in the concentration range from the  MDL to
lOOOxMDL.  Direct   aqueous injection  tech-
niques should be used to measure concentra-
tion levels  above lOOOxMDL.
  12.3  This method was tested by 20 labora-
tories using reagent water, drinking water,
surface  water,    and   three   industrial
wastewaters  spiked at  six concentrations
over the range 8.0 to 500 ng/L.' Single oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration  of the  parameter and es-
sentially independent of the sample  matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table  3.

                References

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. Bellar, T.A., and Lichtenberg, J.J. "De-
termining Volatile  Organics at Microgram-
per-Litre-Levels by Gas  Chromatography,"
Journal of the  American Water Works Associa-
tion, 66, 739 (1974).
  3.  Bellar,  T.A.,  and  Lichtenberg,  J.J.
"Semi-Automated  Headspace   Analysis  of
Drinking Waters and Industrial Waters  for
                                          47

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
            40 CFR Ch.  I (7-1-04 Edition)
Purgeable  Volatile   Organic  Compounds,"
Proceedings from Symposium on Measure-
ment  of Organic  Pollutants  in Water  and
Wastewater, American  Society  for  Testing
and Materials, STP 686, C.E.  Van  Hall,  edi-
tor, 1978.
  4. "Carcinogens—Working  With  Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare,  Public Health  Service, Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational  Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  5. "OSHA Safety and  Health Standards,
General Industry" (29 CPR part 1910), Occupa-
tional  Safety  and  Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American  Chemical Society Publica-
tion,  Committee  on  Chemical  Safety,  3rd
Edition, 1979.
  7. Provost, L.P., and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation of Percent Recovery Data,"  American
Laboratory,  15, 58-63  (1983). (The value  2.44
used in the  equation in Section 8.3.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  8. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetric, DPD-FAS)
and  330.5  (Spectrophotometric,  DPD)  for
Chlorine,  Total  Residual,"  Methods  for
Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA
600/4-79-020,  U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port  Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268,
March 1979.
  9.  "EPA Method Study  24, Method 601—
Purgeable Halocarbons by the Purge and
Trap  Method,"  EPA  600/4-84-064,  National
Technical Information Service, PB84-212448,
Springfield,  Virginia 22161, July  1984.
  10. "Method Validation Data for EPA Meth-
od 601," Memorandum  from B.  Potter, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Environ-
mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, November 10, 1983.
  11. Bellar, T.  A.,  Unpublished data, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Environ-
mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, 1981.
            TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
                    Parameter
                                                         Retention time (min)
                                                     Column 1
                                                                    Column 2
                                Method detection
                                   limit (ug/L)
Chloromethane —     	
Bramomethane 	
Dichlorodifluoromethane	
Vinyl chloride 	
Chloroelhane   	
Methylene chloride     	
Trichlorofluoromethane	
1,1-Dichloroethene  	
1,1-Dichloroethane  	
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene .. .
Chloroform	
1,2-Dichloroethane ..  ..
1,1,1 -Tnchloroethane   	
Carbon tetrachlonde    	
Bromodichloromethane ..
1,2-Dichloropropane	
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 	
Tnchloroethene	
Dibromochloromethane 	
1,1,2-Trichloroethane . .
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvmyl ether
Bromoform	
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene	
1,2-Dichlorobenzene  	
1,4-Dichlorobenzene  	
       1.50
       2.17
       2.62
       267
       3.33
       525
       718
       793
       930
      10.1
      10.7
      11.4
      12.6
      130
      137
      14.9
      152
      158
      165
      165
      16.5
      18.0
      19.2
      21.6
      21 7
      242
      340
      349
      354
 5.28
 7.05
nd
 528
 868
10.1
nd
 772
126
 9.38
12.1
154
13.1
14.4
14.6
16.6
166
131
166
181
180
nd
192
nd
150
18.8
224
23.5
22.3
 0.08
 1 18
 1.81
 018
 052
 0.25
nd
 0.13
 0.07
 0.10
 005
 003
 003
 012
 0.10
 0.04
 034
 012
 009
 002
 0.20
 013
 0.20
 003
 003
 0.25
 032
 015
 024
  Column 1 conditions. Carbopack B (60/80 mesh) coated with 1% SP-1000 packed in an 8 ft x 0.1 in. ID stainless steel or
glass column with helium carrier gas at 40 mL/mm flow rate Column temperature held at 45 °C for 3 mm then programmed at 8
°C/mm to 220 °C and held for 15 mm
  Column 2 conditions: Porisil-C (100/120 mesh) coated with n-octane packed in a 6 ft x 0 1 in. ID stainless steel or glass col-
umn with helium carrier gas at 40 mL/min flow rate. Column temperature held at 50 °C for 3 mm then programmed at 6 °C/min
to 170 °C and held for 4 min.
  nd=not determined.
                                              48

-------
Environmental  Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
              TABLE 2—CALIBRATION AND QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 601»
Parameter
Bromodichloromethane . . . .
Bromoform ....
Bromomeihane .... 	
Carbon tetrachlonde
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvmyl ether 	 ...
Chloroform .... .
Chloromethane ... .
Dibromochloromethane . . .
1 2-Dfchlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane . . 	
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cts-1,3-Dichloropropene . . .
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene . .
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachioroethane . .
Tetrachloroethene . . . . . .
1,1,1-Tnchloroethane .
1,1,2-Tnchloroethane 	
Tnchloroethene
Tnchlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride . ...
Range for Q
(H9'L)
152-248
147-253
1 1 7-28 3
137-263
144-256
154-246
120-280
150-250
1 1 9-28 1
131-269
140-260
9 9-30 1
139-261
168-232
14.3-25.7
126-274
128-272
148-252
12 8-27.2
128-272
155-245
98-302
140-260
142-25.8
157-243
154-246
133-267
137-263
Limit for s
H/L)
43
47
76
56
50
44
83
45
74
63
55
91
55
32
52
66
64
52
73
73
40
92
5.4
49
39
42
60
57
Range for X
(ug/L)
107-320
5 0-29.3
3 4-24 5
1 1 8-25 3
102-274
1 1 3-25 2
45-355
124-240
D-349
7 9-35 1
1 7-38 9
6.2-32 6
11.5-255
1 1 2-24 6
130-265
10.2-273
11.4-27.1
10.1-299
6 2-33 8
6.2-33 8
7.0-27 6
6.6-31 8
8.1-296
10.8-248
96-254
9.2-26 6
74-281
8 2-29 9
Range P,
Ps (%)
42-172
13-159
D-144
43-143
38-150
46-137
14-186
49-133
D-193
24-191
D-208
7-187
42-143
47-132
51-147
28-167
38-155
44-156
22-178
22-178
25-162
8-184
26-162
41-138
39-136
35-146
21-156
28-163
  •"Criteria were calculated assuming a QC check sample concentration of 20 ug/L
  Q=Concentration measured in QC check sample, in ug/L (Section 753)
  s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in ug/L (Section 8 2 41
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ug/L (Section 824)
  P, P^Percent recovery measured (Section 832, Section 842)
  D=Detected, result must be greater than zero.
  NOTE' These cntena are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 3 Where necessary, the limits for recov-
ery have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3


  TABLE  3—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION  AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 601
Parameter
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane .
Carbon tetrachlonde
Chlorobenzene
Choroethane
2-Chloroethylvmyl etherj
Chloroform
Chloromethane . . ,
Dibromochloromethane . .
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene . .
1,4-Dichlorobenzene . .
1,1-Dichloroethane . .
1,2-Dichloroethane . .
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropaned ...
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene d
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene a
Methylene chloride
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 , 1 -Trichtoroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Tnchioroethane
Tnchloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Accuracy, as re-
covery, X' (ug/L)
1 12C-1.02
096C-205
076C-1.27
098C-1 04
1 OOC-1 23
099C-1 53
1 OOC
093C-039
077C+0 18
0 94C+2 72
0 93C+1 70
0 95C+0 43
093C-009
0 95C - 1 08
1 04C - 1 06
098C-087
097C-016
1 OOC
1 OOC
1 OOC
091C-093
095C+019
0 94C+0 06
090C-016
0 86C+0 30
0 87C+0 48
089C-007
097C-036
Single analyst pre-
cision, sr' (ug/L)
011X+004
012X+058
0 28X+0 27
015X+038
015X-002
0 14X-013
020X
013X+0 15
028X-031
011X+1 10
0 20X+0 97
014X+233
015X+029
009X+0.17
011X+070
021X-023
011X+1 46
013X
018X
018X
011X+033
014X+241
0 14X+0 38
015X+004
013X-014
0 13X-003
0 15X+067
013X+065
Overall precision,
S' (ug/L)
0 20X+1 00
021X+241
0 36X+0 94
0 20X+0 39
0 18X+1 21
017X+063
035X
019X-002
0 52X+1 31
0 24X+1 68
0 13X+6 13
0 26X+2 34
0 20X+0 41
014X+094
015X+094
029X-040
0 17X+1 46
023X
032X
032X
021X+1 43
0 23X+2.79
018X+221
0 20X+0 37
0 19X+0.67
0 23X+0 30
0 26X+0.91
0 27X+0.40
 X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in jig/L
                                                49

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
                      40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 sn'=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ug/L
 S1=Expected interlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ug/L.
 C=True value for the concentration, in ug/L
 X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in u,g/L,
 •Estimates based upon the performance in a single laboratory.10
       OPTIONAL
       FOAM
       TRAP
-EXIT K IN.
      0. D.
                            —-14MM 0. D.
                             INLET 1/4 IN.
                                   0. D.
   '/« IN.    _
   0. D.  EXIT
              INLET

             SYRINGE VALVE
     -17CM. 20 GAUGE SYRINGE NEEDLE

          .  0. D. RUBBER SEPTUM
       10MM GLASS FRIT
       MEDIUM POROSITY
/.
L
| L
{
7
*
tf
4f
\
^~10MM. 0. D.


b
\
-^INLET
V. IN. 0. D.
rr
/
/
1/16 IN. O.D.
\y STAINLESS STEEL

1
13X MOLECULAR
SIEVE PURGE
GAS FILTER
r PURGE GAS
*~]FLOW
_\ CONTROL
                        Figure 1. Purging device.
                                       50

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
         Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
      PACKING PROCEDURE
CONSTRUCTION
GLASS CMM
WOOL j
ACTIVATED 1
CHARCOAL 7.7CM


GRADE 15 7 r
SILICA GEL7'71'


TENAX 7.7 C
3*0 V-1 1CWT
GLASSWOOL1UVI


,1


I!

5MM
I
i
p
i
:ss
S
:?•
^
_
                        7-* /FOOT
                      RESISTANCE
                    WIRE WRAPPED
                         SOLID
                   (DOUBLE LAYER)
                           15 CM
                        7-^/FOOT.
                      RESISTANCE
                     WIRE WRAPPED
                           SOLID
                    (SINGLE LAYER)
                            8CM-
               TRAP INLET
          COMPRESSION
          "FITTING NUT
          AND FERRULES
                                          THERMOCOUPLE/
                                          CONTROLLER
                                          SENSOR
           \ TUBING 25CM
            0.105 IN. I.D.
            0.125 IN. O.D.
            STAINLESS STEEL
       Figure 2. Trap packings and construction to include
                 desorb capability
                             51

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
                 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  CARRIER GAS FLOW CONTROL
 PRESSURE REGULATOR

             \
 PURGE GAS
 FLOW CONTROL
 13X MOLECULAR
 SIEVE FILTER
 LIQUID INJECTION PORTS
                 'COLUMN OVEN
                 t — CONFIRMATORY COLUMN
                  TO DETECTOR
                  ' — ANALYTICAL COLUMN
      \ OPTIONAL 4-PORT COLUMN
        SELECTION VALVE
          TRAP INLET
           .RESISTANCE WIRE
           - p=-v CHEATER CONTROL
          — TRAP (OFF)
                  Vx
                  Note:ALL LINES BETWEEN
                      TRAP AND GC
                      SHOULD BE HEATED
                      T08CTC
                                     PURGING
                                     DEVICE
            Figure 3. Purge and trap system-purge mode.
             CARRIER GAS
             FLOW CONTROL
      PRESSURE
      REGULATOR
   PURGE GAS   , __,
   FLOW CONTROL   , ,
     13X MOLECULAR
     SIEVE FILTER
LIQUID INJECTION PORTS
                  .COLUMN OVEN
                I 	CONFIRMATORY COLUMN
                     DETECTOR
                J —ANALYTICAL  COLUMN
       OPTIONAL 4-PORT COLUMN
       SELECTION VALVE
  6-PORT TRAP INLET
  VALVE  J RESISTANCE WIRE   UC.TCO
                          ntAltn
                       ^CONTROL
                                                 Note:
                                                 ALL LINES BETWEEN
                                                 TRAP AND GC
                                                 SHOULD BE HEATED
                                                 TO 80°C.
           PURGING
           DEVICE
         Figure 4. Purge and trap system - desorb mode.
                                 52

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 601
                                                        •8
                               3N3ZN3aoa01HOia-fr 'I
                                    3NVX3HOa01HO-l
                                 3N3ZN380U01H3
                 3NVm30a01HDVai3i-Z 'Z 'I 'I
                                        ••^•H
                     3NVdoadoaoiH3iax-e 'z 'i
           3NVH130a01HOVai31-Z'L'l'l
                               3NVH130IAIOaaiQ-Z 'L
                     3N3dOadOa01H3IQ-E I - «!
                                   «
                                •I 'I

                  3NVH130a01HOiai -I'l'l
            3N3H130UO1HOia-Z' l-su«n
               3NVHi3WOUO1HO
                                     53

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    METHOD 602—PURGE ABLE AROMATIC s

          1. Scope and Application

  1.1  This method covers the determination
of various purgeable aromatics.  The fol-
lowing parameters  may be determined by
this method:
Parameter
Benzene 	
Chlorobenzene 	
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene ....
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene 	
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene 	
Ethylbenzene 	
Toluene 	 	
STORET
No
34030
34301
34536
34566
34571
34371
34010
CAS No
71-43-2
108-90-7
95-50-1
541-73-1
106-46-7
100-41-4
108-88-3
  1.2  This  is  a  purge   and  trap  gas
chromatographic (GC) method applicable  to
the determination of the compounds listed
above in municipal and industrial discharges
as provided under 40 CFR 136.1.  When this
method is  used  to analyze unfamiliar sam-
ples for any or all of the compounds above,
compound  identifications  should  be  sup-
ported by at least one additional qualitative
technique.  This method describes analytical
conditions  for a second gas chromatographic
column that can be used to confirm measure-
ments made with the primary column. Meth-
od  624 provides gas chromatograph/mass
spectrometer  (GC/MS)  conditions   appro-
priate for  the qualitative and quantitative
confirmation of results for all of the param-
eters listed above.
  1.3  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined  in Section 12.1)' for each parameter is
listed in Table  1. The MDL  for a  specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending upon  the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.4  Any  modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as  a  major modification  subject  to
application and approval of alternate test
procedures under 40 CPR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.5  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the  supervision of analysts experi-
enced in the operation of a purge and trap
system and a gas chromatograph and in the
interpretation of gas chromatograms. Each
analyst must demonstrate the ability to gen-
erate  acceptable results with this  method
using  the procedure described in Section 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method
  2 1  An inert gas is bubbled through a 5-mL
water  sample contained in  a specially-de-
signed purging chamber at ambient tempera-
ture.  The  aromatics are efficiently trans-
ferred from the  aqueous phase to the vapor
phase. The vapor is swept through a sorbent
trap where the aromatics are trapped. After
purging is  completed, the trap is heated and
backflushed with the  inert gas to desorb the
aromatics  onto  a gas chromatographic col-
umn. The gas chromatograph is temperature
programmed  to  separate  the  aromatics
which    are    then   detected   with   a
photoionizatlon detector.2-3
  2.2  The method provides  an optional gas
chromatographic  column that may be help-
ful  in  resolving the compounds of interest
from interferences that may occur.

              3. Interferences
  3.1  Impurities  in  the  purge gas and  or-
ganic compounds outgassing from the plumb-
ing ahead of the trap account for the major-
ity of contamination problems. The analyt-
ical system must be  demonstrated to be free
from contamination  under the conditions of
the analysis by running  laboratory reagent
blanks as described in Section 8.1.3. The use
of  non-Teflon  plastic  tubing,  non-Teflon
thread sealants, or flow controllers with rub-
ber components in the purge and trap system
should be avoided.
  3.2  Samples can be contaminated by diffu-
sion of volatile organics through the septum
seal into the  sample during shipment and
storage. A field reagent blank prepared from
reagent water and carried through the sam-
pling  and handling protocol can serve as a
check on such contamination.
  3.3  Contamination by   carry-over  can
occur whenever high level and low level sam-
ples are sequentially analyzed.  To reduce
carry-over, the purging  device and sample
syringe must be  rinsed with reagent water
between  sample analyses. Whenever an un-
usually concentrated sample is encountered,
it should be followed by  an analysis of rea-
gent water to check for cross contamination.
For samples containing large amounts  of
water-soluble  materials,  suspended  solids,
high boiling compounds or high aromatic
levels, it may be necessary to wash the purg-
ing device with a  detergent solution, rinse it
with distilled  water, and then dry it in an
oven at 105 °C between analyses. The trap and
other parts of the system are also subject to
contamination; therefore, frequent bakeout
and purging of the entire system may be re-
quired.

                 4. Safety
  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity  of
each reagent used in this  method has not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be  treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. From this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level  by whatever means
available. The  laboratory is responsible for
maintaining  a current  awareness file  of
OSHA  regulations regarding the  safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made available to all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional  references to laboratory  safety
                                          54

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
are available and have been Identified4-6 for
the information of the analyst.
  4.2  The  following parameters covered by
this method have been tentatively classified
as  known or  suspected,  human  or  mam-
malian  carcinogens:  benzene  and  1,4-
dichlorobenzene. Primary standards of these
toxic  compounds  should be  prepared in a
hood.  A NIOSH/MESA approved toxic gas
respirator  should be worn when the analyst
handles high concentrations  of these toxic
compounds.

         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling equipment, for discrete sam-
pling.
  5.1.1  Vial]25-mL   capacity   or   larger,
equipped with a screw cap with a hole in the
center (Pierce  #13075 or equivalent). Deter-
gent wash, rinse with tap and distilled water,
and dry at 105 °C before use.
  5.1.2  Septum—Teflon-faced       silicone
(Pierce #12722  or  equivalent).  Detergent
wash, rinse with tap and distilled water, and
dry at 105 °C for 1 h before use.
  5.2  Purge and trap system—The purge and
trap system consists of three separate pieces
of equipment:  A purging  device, trap,  and
desorber. Several complete  systems are  now
commercially available.
  5.2.1  The purging device must be designed
to accept 5-mL samples with a water column
at least 3  cm deep. The  gaseous head space
between the water column and the trap must
have a total volume of less than 15 mL.  The
purge gas  must pass through the water col-
umn as finely divided bubbles with a diame-
ter of less than 3 mm  at the  origin.  The
purge gas must be  introduced no more than
5 mm  from the base of the  water column.
The purging device illustrated in Figure 1
meets these design criteria.
  5.2.2  The trap must be at least 25 cm long
and have an inside  diameter of at least 0.105
in.
  5.2.2.1  The trap  is packed with 1  cm of
methyl silicone coated  packing (Section
6.4.2) and 23 cm of 2,6-diphenylene oxide poly-
mer (Section 6.4.1) as shown in Figure 2. This
trap was  used  to  develop the  method  per-
formance statements in Section 12.
  5.2.2.2  Alternatively, either  of the  two
traps described  in Method 601 may be used,
although water vapor will preclude the meas-
urement of low concentrations of benzene.
  5.2.3  The desorber must be capable of  rap-
idly heating the trap to 180 °C. The polymer
section of the  trap  should not be  heated
higher than 180 °C and  the remaining  sec-
tions should not exceed 200 °C. The desorber
illustrated in Figure 2 meets these design
criteria.
  5.2.4  The purge  and trap system may be
assembled as a separate unit or be coupled to
a gas chromatograph as illustrated in Fig-
ures 3, 4, and 5.
  5.3  Gas   chromatograph—An   analytical
system complete  with a  temperature pro-
grammable  gas chromatograph suitable for
on-column injection and all required acces-
sories including  syringes,  analytical col-
umns, gases,  detector, and strip-chart re-
corder. A data system is  recommended for
measuring peak areas.
  5.3.1 Column 1—6 ft long x 0.082 in. ID
stainless steel or glass, packed with 5% SP-
1200 and  175%  Bentone-34  on Supelcoport
(100/120 mesh)  or  equivalent.  This column
was used to develop the method performance
statements in Section 12. Guidelines for the
use of alternate column  packings are pro-
vided in Section 10.1.
  5.3.2 Column 2—8 ft long x 0.1 in ID stain-
less steel or  glass,  packed with  5%  1,2,3-
Tris(2-cyanoethoxy)propane  on Chromosorb
W-AW (60/80 mesh) or equivalent.
  5.3.3 Detector—Photoionization  detector
(h-Nu Systems, Inc. Model PI-51-02 or equiv-
alent). This type of detector  has been proven
effective in the analysis of wastewaters for
the parameters listed  in the scope (Section
1.1), and was used to  develop  the method per-
formance statements  in Section  12. Guide-
lines  for the use of alternate  detectors are
provided in Section 10.1.
  5.4  Syringes—5-mL glass hypodermic with
Luerlok tip (two each), if applicable to the
purging device.
  5.5  Micro syringes—25-|o.L,  0.006 in. ID nee-
dle.
  5.6  Syringe valve—2-way,  with  Luer ends
(three each).
  5.7  Bottle—15-mL, screw-cap, with Teflon
cap liner.
  5.8  Balance—Analytical, capable of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.

                6. Reagents
  6.1  Reagent  water—Reagent water is de-
fined  as a water in  which an  interferent is
not observed at the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.1.1 Reagent water can be  generated by
passing tap water through a carbon filter bed
containing about  1  Ib of  activated carbon
(Filtrasorb-300, Calgon Corp., or equivalent).
  6.1.2 A   water    purification   system
(Millipore Super-Q or equivalent) may be
used to generate reagent water.
  6.1.3 Reagent water may also be prepared
by boiling water for 15 min. Subsequently,
while maintaining the temperature at  90 °C,
bubble a contaminant-free  inert gas through
the water for 1 h. While  still hot, transfer
the water to a narrow mouth screw-cap bot-
tle  and seal with a Teflon-lined septum and
cap.
  6.2  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.3  Hydrochloric acid (1+1)—Add 50 mL of
concentrated HC1 (ACS) to 50 mL of reagent
water.
  6.4  Trap Materials:
                                          55
      203-160  D-3

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  6.4.1  2,6-Diphenylene   oxide   polymer—
Tenax, (60/80 mesh), chromatographic grade
or equivalent.
  6.4.2  Methyl silicone packing—3% OV-1 on
Chromosorb-W (60/80 mesh) or equivalent.
  6.5  Methanol—Pesticide quality  or equiv-
alent.
  6.6  Stock   standard   solutions—Stock
standard solutions may  be  prepared from
pure standard materials or purchased as cer-
tified solutions. Prepare stock standard solu-
tions in methanol using assayed liquids. Be-
cause of the toxicity  of benzene and  1,4-
dichlorobenzene, primary dilutions of these
materials should be prepared in a hood. A
NIOSH/MESA approved toxic  gas respirator
should be  used when the analyst handles
high concentrations of such materials.
  6.6.1  Place about 9.8 mL of methanol into
a 10-mL ground glass stoppered volumetric
flask. Allow  the flask to stand, unstoppered,
for  about 10  min or until all alcohol wetted
surfaces have dried. Weigh the flask to the
nearest 0.1 mg.
  6.6.2  Using a 100-fiL syringe, immediately
add two or more drops of assayed  reference
material to the flask,  then reweigh. Be sure
that the drops fall directly into the alcohol
without contacting the neck of the flask.
  6.6.3  Reweigh,  dilute to volume, stopper,
then  mix  by inverting  the  flask  several
times.  Calculate the concentration in iig/uJL
from the net gain in weight. When compound
purity is assayed  to be 96%  or greater, the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate the concentration of the stock stand-
ard. Commercially prepared stock standards
can be used at any concentration if they are
certified by the manufacturer or by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.6.4  Transfer the stock standard solution
into a Teflon-sealed screw-cap bottle. Store
at 4 °C and protect from light.
  6.6.5  All standards must be replaced after
one  month,  or  sooner if comparison  with
check standards indicates a problem.
  6.7  Secondary dilution standards—Using
stock standard solutions, prepare  secondary
dilution standards in methanol that contain
the compounds of interest,  either  singly or
mixed  together.  The secondary  dilution
standards should be prepared at concentra-
tions such  that  the  aqueous  calibration
standards prepared in Section 7.3.1  or 7.4.1
will bracket the working range of the ana-
lytical system. Secondary solution standards
must be  stored with  zero  headspace  and
should be  checked frequently for signs of
degradation  or evaporation, especially just
prior to preparing calibration standards from
them.
  6.8  Quality  control check sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7.  Calibration
  7.1  Assemble a purge and trap system that
meets the specifications in Section 5.2. Con-
dition  the  trap overnight  at  180  °C  by
backflushing with an inert  gas  flow of at
least 20 mL/min. Condition the trap for 10
min once daily prior to use.
  7.2  Connect the purge and trap system to
a   gas   chromatograph.   The   gas   chro-
matograph must be operated using tempera-
ture and flow rate  conditions equivalent to
those given in Table  1. Calibrate the purge
and trap-gas chromatographic system using
either the external standard technique (Sec-
tion 7.3)  or the internal standard technique
(Section 7.4).
  7.3  External standard  calibration  proce-
dure:
  7.3.1  Prepare  calibration standards  at a
minimum of three  concentration levels  for
each parameter by carefully adding 20.0 (iL of
one or more secondary dilution standards to
100, 500, or 1000 mL of reagent water. A 25-uL
syringe with a 0.006 in. ID needle should be
used for  this operation. One  of the external
standards should be at a concentration near,
but above, the MDL (Table 1) and the other
concentrations should correspond to the  ex-
pected range of concentrations found  in real
samples or should define the working range
of  the detector. These aqueous  standards
must be prepared fresh daily.
  7,3.2  Analyze  each calibration  standard
according to Section 10,  and tabulate  peak
height or  area responses versus the  con-
centration in the standard. The results can
be  used  to prepare a calibration curve  for
each compound. Alternatively, if the ratio of
response  to concentration (calibration  fac-
tor) is a constant  over the  working range
(<10% relative standard deviation, RSD), lin-
earity through the origin can be assumed
and the  average ratio or calibration factor
can be used in place of a calibration curve.
  7.4  Internal  standard  calibration  proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select  one or more internal standards that
are similar  in  analytical behavior  to the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate that the measurement of
the  internal standard is not  affected  by
method or matrix interferences.  Because of
these limitations, no internal standard can
be  suggested that is  applicable to all  sam-
ples. The compound,  a,a,a,-trifluorotoluene,
recommended as a surrogate spiking  com-
pound in Section 8.7  has been used success-
fully as an internal standard.
  7.4.1 Prepare  calibration  standards  at a
minimum  of three concentration levels  for
each parameter of interest  as described in
Section 7.3.1.
  7.4.2 Prepare  a  spiking   solution  con-
taining each of the internal  standards using
the procedures described in Sections  6.6 and
6.7. It is recommended that the secondary di-
lution standard be  prepared  at a concentra-
tion of 15 iig/mL of  each internal standard
compound.  The addition  of 10  |il of  this
                                          56

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A.Meth. 602
standard to 5.0 mL of sample or calibration
standard would be equivalent to 30 ng/L.
  7.4.3 Analyze  each calibration standard
according to Section 10, adding 10 H.L of in-
ternal standard spiking solution directly to
the  syringe  (Section 10.4).  Tabulate  peak
height or area responses  against  concentra-
tion for each  compound and internal stand-
ard, and calculate response factors (RF) for
each compound using Equation 1.

        RP=    (AS)(C,S)   (A,,)(CS)

                                Equation 1

where:
A,=Response for  the  parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration of the internal standard
Cs=Concentration of the  parameter  to be
  measured.
If the RF value over  the working range is a
constant (<10% RSD), the RF can be assumed
to be invariant and the average RF  can be
used for calculations. Alternatively,  the re-
sults can be used to plot a calibration curve
of response ratios, A s/A,s, vs. RF.
  7.5  The  working calibration curve,  cali-
bration factor,  or  RF must be  verified on
each working  day by the measurement  of a
QC check sample.
  7.5.1  Prepare  the QC check sample as de-
scribed in Section 8.2.2.
  7.5.2  Analyze the QC check sample accord-
ing- to Section 10.
  7.5.3  For each parameter, compare the re-
sponse (Q) with  the  corresponding calibra-
tion acceptance criteria found in  Table 2. If
the responses  for all parameters of interest
fall within the designated ranges, analysis of
actual samples can begin.  If any individual Q
falls outside  the range,  a new  calibration
curve, calibration factor, or RF must be pre-
pared for that parameter according to Sec-
tion 7.3 or 7.4.

             8. Quality Control

  8.1 Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to  operate a formal quality con-
trol  program.  The mimimum  requirements
of this  program  consist of an initial  dem-
onstration of  laboratory  capability and an
ongoing analysis of spiked samples to evalu-
ate and document data quality. The labora-
tory must maintain records to document the
quality  of data that is generated. Ongoing
data quality checks  are compared with es-
tablished performance criteria to determine
if the results  of analyses  meet the perform-
ance characteristics of the method. When re-
sults  of sample  spikes  indicate atypical
method performance,  a quality control check
standard must be analyzed to confirm that
the measurements were performed in an in-
control mode of operation.
  8.1.1 The analyst must make an initial,
one-time, demonstration of the ability to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2 In recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tion 10.1) to improve the separations or lower
the cost  of measurements. Each time such a
modification is made to the method, the ana-
lyst is required to repeat the procedure in
Section 8.2.
  8.1.3 Each day, the analyst must analyze a
reagent  water blank  to demonstrate  that
interferences from the analytical system are
under control,
  8.1.4 The laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, spike and analyze a minimum  of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5 The laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the  measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4. The  frequency  of the check  standard
analyses  is equivalent to 10%  of all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from samples (Section  8.3) meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6 The laboratory must maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish the ability  to  generate
acceptable accuracy and precision,  the  ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1 A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing each pa-
rameter of interest at a  concentration of 10
ug/mL in methanol. The QC  check sample
concentrate must be obtained from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Environ-
mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
in Cincinnati,  Ohio, if available. If not avail-
able from that source, the QC check sample
concentrate must be obtained from another
external  source. If not available from either
source above,  the   QC check  sample  con-
centrate  must be prepared by the laboratory
using stock  standards  prepared  independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2 Prepare a QC check sample to  con-
tain 20 (ig/L of each parameter by adding 200
fiL of QC  check sample concentrate to 100 mL
of reagant water.
  8.2.3 Analyze  four 5-mL aliquots  of  the
well-mixed QC check  sample according to
Section 10.
  8.2.4 Calculate the average recovery (X) in
|ig/L,  and the  standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in ng/L, for each parameter of in-
terest using the four results.
  8.2.5 For each parameter compare s and X
with  the corresponding  acceptance criteria
                                          57

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
for precision and accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 2. If s and X for all param-
eters  of interest meet the acceptance cri-
teria, the system performance  is acceptable
and analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any individual s exceeds the precision limit
or any individual X falls outside the range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter.
  NOTE: The large number of parameters  in
Table  2 present a substantial  probability
that one or more will fail at least one of the
acceptance criteria when all parameters are
analyzed.
  8.2.6  When one or more of the  parameters
tested fail at least one of the acceptance cri-
teria, the analyst must proceed according  to
Section 8.2.6.1 or 8.2.6.2.
  8.2.6.1  Locate and  correct the source  of
the problem and repeat the test for all pa-
rameters of interest beginning with Section
8.2.3.
  8.2.6.2  Beginning with Section 8.2.3, repeat
the test  only for those  parameters  that
failed  to meet  criteria.  Repeated failure,
however,  will confirm a  general problem
with the measurement system. If this occurs,
locate  and correct the source of the problem
and repeat the test for all compounds of in-
terest beginning with Section 8.2.3.
  8.3  The laboratory  must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike  at least 10% of the  samples from
each sample site being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing one  to
ten samples  per month, at least one spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1  The  concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If,   as  in  compliance  monitoring,
the concentration  of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration  limit, the spike should
be at that limit or 1  to 5 times higher  than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If  the  concentration  of a specific
parameter   in  the  sample  is  not being
checked against a limit specific  to that pa-
rameter, the spike  should be at 20 jig/L or 1
to 5 times higher than the background con-
centration  determined  in  Section   8.3.2,
whichever concentration would be larger.
  8.3.2   Analyze  one 5-mL sample aliquot  to
determine the background concentration (B)
of each parameter. If necessary, prepare a
new QC check sample concentrate (Section
8.2.1)  appropriate  for the background  con-
centrations  in the sample. Spike a second 5-
mL sample  aliquot with 10 |iL  of the QC
check  sample concentrate and analyze  it  to
determine  the concentration after spiking
(A) of each parameter. Calculate each per-
cent recovery (P) as 100(A-B)%/T, where T is
the known true value  of the spike.
  8.3.3   Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with  the corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 2. These
acceptance criteria  were calculated to in-
clude an allowance for error in measurement
of both the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent that  the  analyst's  spike to back-
ground ratio approaches 5:1.' If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than 20
p.g/L, the analyst must use either the QC ac-
ceptance criteria in  Table 2, or optional QC
acceptance criteria  calculated for the  spe-
cific spike concentration. To calculate op-
tional acceptance criteria for the recovery of
a parameter:  (1)  Calculate accuracy   (X')
using the equation in Table 3, substituting
the spike concentration  (T) for C; (2) cal-
culate overall precision (S') using the equa-
tion in Table 3, substituting X' for X; (3) cal-
culate the range  for recovery  at the spike
concentration as (100 X'/T) ±2.44(100 S'/T)%.7
  8.3.4  If any individual P falls outside the
designated range  for recovery, that param-
eter has failed the  acceptance criteria. A
check standard containing  each parameter
that failed the criteria must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
criteria for recovery in  Section  8.3, a QC
check standard containing  each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE:  The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the number  of parameters  being simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix,  and the performance of the labora-
tory.
  8.4.1  Prepare the  QC  check standard by
adding 10 jiL of QC check sample concentrate
(Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 5  mL of reagent
water. The QC check standard needs only to
contain the parameters  that failed criteria
in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2  Analyze the  QC  check  standard to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3  Compare the percent recovery  (Ps)
for  each parameter  with the corresponding
QC  acceptance criteria found in Table 2. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared with these criteria. If
the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
side the designated range,  the laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control,  and the problem  must be
immediately identified and corrected.  The
analytical result  for that parameter in the
unspiked sample is suspect  and may not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the  QC program for the lab-
oratory, method accuracy  for wastewater
samples must be assessed and  records must
be  maintained. After the  analysis of  five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate  the average percent recovery (P)
                                          58

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent recovery interval from P-2sp to
P+2sp. If P=90% and sp=10%, for example, the
accuracy interval is expressed as 70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter  on a regular basis  (e.g. after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6  It  is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this method. The specific prac-
tices that are most productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates may be ana-
lyzed to  assess the precision of the environ-
mental  measurements. When  doubt  exists
over the  identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas chromatography  with a dissimilar col-
umn, specific  element  detector,  or mass
spectrometer must be used. Whenever pos-
sible, the laboratory should analyze standard
reference materials  and participate  in rel-
evant performance evaluation studies.
  8.7 The analyst should monitor both the
performance  of  the  analytical  system  and
the effectiveness of the method in dealing
with each sample matrix by spiking  each
sample, standard,  and reagent water blank
with surrogate  compounds  (e.g.  a,  a, a,-
trifluorotoluene)  that encompass  the range
of the temperature  program used in this
method.  From stock standard solutions pre-
pared as  in Section 6.6, add a volume to give
750 \ig of each surrogate to 45 mL of reagent
water contained in a 50-mL volumetric flask,
mix and dilute to volume for a concentration
of 15 mg/uL. Add 10 uL of this surrogate spik-
ing solution directly  into  the 5-mL syringe
with every  sample and reference  standard
analyzed. Prepare a fresh surrogate spiking'
solution  on a weekly basis. If the internal
standard calibration procedure is being used,
the surrogate compounds may be added di-
rectly to the internal standard spiking solu-
tion (Section 7.4.2).

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1 The samples must be iced or refrig-
erated from the time of collection until anal-
ysis. If the sample contains free or combined
chlorine,  add  sodium thiosulfate preserva-
tive  (10 mg/40 mL is sufficient for up to  5
ppm C12) to  the  empty sample bottle just
prior to  shipping to the sampling site. EPA
Method 330.4 or 330.5  may be used for meas-
urement  of residual chlorine.8 Field test kits
are available for this purpose.
  9.2 Collect about 500 mL  of sample in  a
clean container. Adjust the pH of the sample
to about 2 by adding  1+1 HC1 while stirring
Fill the sample bottle in such a manner that
no air bubbles pass  through the sample as
the bottle is being filled. Seal the bottle so
that no air bubbles are entrapped in it. Main-
tain the hermetic seal on the sample bottle
until time of analysis.
  9.3  All samples must  be analyzed within
14 days of collection.3

               10. Procedure

  10.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating conditions  for  the  gas  chrom-
atograph. Included  in this table are  esti-
mated retention times and MDL that can be
achieved under these conditions. An example
of the separations achieved by Column 1 is
shown in Figure 6.  Other packed columns,
chromatographic  conditions,  or  detectors
may be used if the requirements of Section
8.2 are met.
  10.2  Calibrate  the system  daily  as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  10.3  Adjust  the purge gas (nitrogen or he-
lium) flow rate  to  40 mL/min. Attach  the
trap inlet to the  purging device, and set the
purge and trap system to purge (Figure  3).
Open the syringe valve located on the purg-
ing- device sample introduction needle.
  10.4  Allow the sample  to come to ambient
temperature prior to introducing it  to  the
syringe. Remove the plunger from a 5-mL sy-
ringe and attach a closed syringe valve. Open
the sample bottle (or standard) and carefully
pour the sample into  the  syringe barrel to
just short  of  overflowing.  Replace  the sy-
ringe plunger and compress the sample. Open
the syringe  valve and  vent any residual air
while adjusting the sample volume to 5.0 mL.
Since this process of taking an aliquot de-
stroys the validity of the sample  for future
analysis, the analyst should fill a second sy-
ringe at this time to protect against possible
loss of  data. Add 10.0 uL of  the  surrogate
spiking solution (Section 8.7)  and 10.0 uL of
the internal standard spiking  solution (Sec-
tion 7 4.2),  if applicable, through  the valve
bore, then close the valve.
  10.5 Attach the syringe-syringe valve as-
sembly  to the syringe valve on the purging
device.  Open the syringe valves and inject
the sample into the purging chamber.
  10.6  Close both valves and purge the sam-
ple  for 12.0+0.1 min at ambient temperature.
  10.7  After  the  12-min purge  time, dis-
connect  the purging device from the trap.
Dry the trap by maintaining a flow of 40 mL/
min of dry purge gas  through it  for 6 min
(Figure 4). If the purging device has no provi-
sion for bypassing the purger for this step, a
dry purger should be inserted into the device
to minimize moisture in  the gas. Attach the
trap to the chromatograph, adjust the purg-e
and trap system to the desorb mode (Figure
5), and begin to temperature program the gas
chromatograph. Introduce the trapped mate-
rials to the GC column  by rapidly heating
the trap to 180 °C while backflushing the trap
with an inert gas between 20 and 60 mL/min
for 4 min. If rapid heating of the trap cannot
be achieved, the GC  column must be used as
                                          59

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth.602
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
a secondary trap by cooling it to 30 °C (sub-
ambient temperature, if poor peak geometry
and random retention time problems persist)
instead of the initial program temperature of
50 °C.
  10.8  While the trap is being desorbed into
the gas chromatograph column,  empty the
purging chamber using the sample introduc-
tion syringe. Wash  the chamber with two 5-
mL flushes of reagent water.
  10.9  After desorbing the sample for 4 min,
recondition the trap by returning the purge
and trap system to the purge mode. Wait 15
s, then close the syringe valve on the purg-
ing device to begin gas  flow  through the
trap. The trap temperature should be main-
tained at  180 °C. After approximately 7 min,
turn off the trap heater and open the syringe
valve to stop the gas flow  through the trap.
When the trap is cool, the next sample can
be analyzed.
  10.10  Identify the parameters in the sam-
ple by comparing the retention times of the
peaks  in  the sample chromatogram with
those   of   the    peaks   in   standard
chromatograms. The width of the retention
time window used  to  make identifications
should be based upon  measurements of ac-
tual retention time variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three times the
standard deviation  of a retention time for a
compound can  be  used to calculate  a  sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the analyst should  weigh heavily  in the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  10.11  If the response for a peak exceeds
the working range  of the system, prepare a
dilution of the  sample with reagent water
from the  aliquot in the second syringe and
reanalyze.

              11, Calculations

  11.1  Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  11.1.1 If the external standard  calibration
procedure is used,  calculate the  concentra-
tion of the parameter being measured from
the  peak  response using  the  calibration
curve  or  calibration factor determined  in
Section 7.3.2.
  11.1.2 If the internal standard  calibration
procedure is used,  calculate the  concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined in Section 7.4.3 and Equa-
tion 2.

                            (AS)(C1S)
    Concentration (|ig/L) = ;    ;,   ;
                            (A1S)(RF)

  Equation 2
where:
As = Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
Als = Response for the internal standard.
C1S = Concentration of the internal standard.
  11.2  Report results in ug/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          12. Method Performance

  12.1  The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence  that the value is above
zero.1  The  MDL concentrations  listed in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.9
Similar results  were  achieved using  rep-
resentative wastewaters. The MDL actually
achieved in a given analysis will vary de-
pending on  instrument  sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  12.2  This method  has been demonstrated
to be applicable  for the concentration range
from the MDL to 100  x MDL.9 Direct aqueous
injection techniques  should be used to meas-
ure concentration levels above 1000 x MDL.
  12.3  This method was tested by  20 labora-
tories  using reagent water,  drinking water,
surface  water,   and   three    industrial
wastewaters  spiked  at six  concentrations
over the range 2.1 to 550 ug/L.9 Single  oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found  to be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter and es-
sentially independent of the sample matrix.
Linear equations to  describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 3.

                References

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. Lichtenberg, J.J. "Determining Volatile
Organics at  Microgram-per-Litre-Levels by
Gas Chromatography," Journal  American
Water Works Association, 66, 739 (1974).
  3.  Bellar,  T.A.,   and Lichtenberg,  J.J.
"Semi-Automated  Headspace  Analysis  of
Drinking Waters and Industrial Waters for
Purgeable  Volatile  Organic  Compounds,"
Proceedings of Symposium on Measurement
of Organic Pollutants in Water and Waste-
water. American Society for Testing and Ma-
terials, STP 686, C.E. Van Hall,  editor,  1978.
  4.  "Carcinogens—Working  with Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Public  Health Service,  Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and  Health. Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  5.  "OSHA Safety  and Health  Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR part 1910), Occu-
pational Safety  and  Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion, Committee on Safety, 3rd Edition, 1979.
  7. Provost, L.P., and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation of Percent Recovery Data," American
Laboratory,  15,  58-63 (1983).  (The  value 2.44
used in the equation in Section 8.3.3. is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
                                          60

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                    Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
  8."Methods  330.4  (Titrimetric,  DPD-FAS)
and  330.5  (Spectrophotometric,   DPD)  for
Chlorine,   Total  Residual,"  Methods  for
Chemical  Analysis  of  Water  and  Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020, U.S.  Environmental  Pro-
tection  Agency, Office of Research  and De-
velopment,  Environmental  Monitoring  and
Support Laboratory, Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268.
March 1979.
  9. "EPA Method  Study  25,  Method  602,
Purgeable Aromatics,"  EPA  600/4-84-042,  Na-
tional Technical Information Service, PB84-
196682, Springfield, Virginia 22161, May 1984.

TABLE 1— CHROMATOGRAPHIC  CONDITIONS AND
          METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
                                     TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND
                                         METHOD DETECTION LIMITS—Continued
Parameter
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Chlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Retention time (mm)
Column 1
575
825
9.17
168
182
259
Column 2
425
625
802
16.2
150
194
Method
detection
limit
(H9/L)
02
0.2
02
03
04
04
                                      Column 1  conditions  Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) coated
                                     with 5% SP-1200/1.75% Bentone-34 packed in a 6 ft x 0 085
                                     in ID stainless steel column with helium carrier gas at 36 mL7
                                     mm flow rate Column temperature held at 50  °C for 2 mm
                                     then programmed at 6 °C/min to 90 °C for a final hold
                                      Column 2 conditions Chromosorb W-AW (60/80 mesh)
                                     coated  with 5% 1,2,3-Tns(2-cyanoethyoxy)propane packed in
                                     a 6 ft x 0 085 in ID stainless steel column with helium carrier
                                     gas at  30 mL/mm flow rate Column temperature held at 40
                                     °C for 2 mm then programmed at 2 °C/min to  100 °C for a
                                     final hold

TABLE 2—CALIBRATION AND QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 602a
Parameter
Benzene
Retention time (mm)
Column 1
333
Column 2
275
Method
detection
limit
(ng/L)
02
Parameter
Benzene , . .....
Chlorobenzene .
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene . . .
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Range for Q
(ra/L)
154-246
16 1-239
136-264
145-255
139-261
126-274
155-245
Limit for
s (ng/L)
4 1
35
58
50
55
67
40
Range for X
(ra/L)
100-279
127-254
106-276
12 8-25 5
1 1 6-25 5
100-282
1 1 2-27 7
Range for
P, Ps(%)
39-150
55-135
37-154
50-141
42-143
32-160
46-148
  Q=Concentration measured in QC check sample, in ng/L (Section 753)
  s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 824)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 824)
  Ps, P=Percent recovery measured (Section 832, Section 842)
  a Criteria were calculated assuming a QC check sample concentration of 20 ng/L
  Note These criteria are based directly upon the  method performance data in Table 3. Where necessary, the limits for recovery
have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3

  TABLE 3—METHOD  ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 602
Parameter
Benzene 	 ...
Chlorobenzene . .
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene .... . .
Ethylbenzene
Toluene . .
Accuracy, as
recovery, X'
(ng/L)
0.92C+0 57
0 95C+0 02
0 93C+0 52
096C-005
093C-009
0 94C+0 31
0 94C+0 65
Single analyst
precision, s'
(ng/L)
0 09X+0 59
0 09X+0 23
0.17X-004
015X-010
015X+02S
017X+046
0 09X+0 48
Overall preci-
sion, S' (ug/L)
021X+056
0 17X+0 10
0 22X+0 53
019X+009
0 20X+0 41
0 26X+0 23
018X+071
 X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in jig/L
 S'=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X_, in X |o.g/L
 S'=Expected Intel-laboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in Ltg/L
 C=True value for the Concentration, in Lig/L
 X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in ^g/L
                                               61

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
                 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
     OPTIONAL
      FOAM
      TRAP
-EXIT % IN.
     0. D.

--14MM 0. D.

INLET % IN.
      0. D.
                I /
                11
                i r
                < i
                11
                i <
  
-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                       Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
        PACKING PROCEDURE
      GLASS
       WOOL
     TENAX 23CM
     3%OV-11CMi
 GLASS WOOL 5MM'
1
CONSTRUCTION
       COMPRESSION FITTING
       NUT AND FERRULES
        14FT.7^/FOOT RESISTANCE
        WIRE WRAPPED SOLID

        THERMOCOUPLE/
        CONTROLLER
        SENSOR
               TRAP INLET
                            C i ^ \.
                     ELECTRONIC
                     TEMPERATURE
                     CONTROL
                     AND
                     PYROMETER
                  TUBING 25CM.
                  0.105 IN. I.D.
                  0.125 IN. O.D.
                  STAINLESS STEEL
  Figure 2. Trap packings and construction to include
           desorb capability.
                            63

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
                                40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
        Carrier Gas Flow Control   Liquid Injection Ports
    Pressure Regulator
   Purge Gas
   Flow Control \i—
    13X Molecular
    Sieve Filter
   Purging
                I  ^ r Device
                                   Column Oven

                                 ._ Confirmatory Column
                                   To Detector
                               J  """^Analytical Column
Valve-3
Optional 4-Port Column
Selection Valve
         Trap Inlet (Tenax End)
           Resistance Wire
                                  Valve-1
                                                             , Heater Control
                                                  Note:  All Lines Between
                                                        Trap and GC
                                                        Should be Heated
                                                        to 80°C
                             Valve-2

              Figure 3. Purge and trap system - purge mode
       Carrier Gas Flow Control
     Pressure Regulator\***H kd
                                    lid Injection Ports
    Purge Gas
    Flow Control X
   Purging
^ Device
                                    Column Oven

                                  ..._ Confirmatory Column
                                    To Detector
                                       Analytical Column
         Valve-3
         Optional 4-Port Column
         Selection Valve
           Trap Inlet (Tenax End)
 Valve-1  /    Resistance Wire
    13X Molecular
    Sieve Filter  	~VA

                   W
                     	-9 Vah/e-2
                                                                Heater Control
                                   Note:  All Lines Between
                                         Trap and GC
                                         Should be Heated
                                         to 80 °C
                  Figure 4. Purge and trap system-dry mode.
                                       64

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                     Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 602
            Carrier Gas Flow Control

         Pressure Regulator
       Purge Gas
       Flow Control \|—
        13X Molecular
        Sieve Filter
Liquid Injection Ports
                                    Valve-3
                                    Optional 4-Port Column
                                    Selection Valve
          Trap Inlet (Tenax End)
           Resistance Wire
                                 Valve-2
                     Column Oven

                   ^  Confirmatory Column
                     To Detector
                        Analytical Column
                                                               Heater Control
             Note:  All Lines Between
                   Trap and GC
                   Should be Heated
                   to 80°C
                 Figure 5. Purge and trap system-desorb mode.
g g Column: 5% SP 1200/1.75% Bentone - 34
c S on Supelcoport
co « JJ Program: 50 °C for 2 min.










,—
§ § £ Detector: Photoionization.
g "3 « ~

1
H
„
«
e
i

u
*~ 1
f
*1
Li






-J







-
j g »
||
z -
H^z
_o
• 9
. CO
r-



6°C/min to 90 °(
10.2V


I
o
£
_o
o
9
evi
A^
II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
       0   2   4   6   8   10  12   14  16  18  20  22  24  26  28

                              Retention Time, Min.


        Figure 6.  Gas chromatogram of purgeable aromatics.
                                        65

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 603
           40 CFRCh. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
 METHOD 603—ACROLEIN AND ACRYLONITRILE

          1. Scope and Application

  1.1  This method covers the determination
of acrolein and aorylonitrile. The following
parameters may be determined by this meth-
od:
Parameter
Acrolein . . .
Acrvlonrtnle 	
STORET
No
34210
34215
CAS No.
107-02-8
107-13-1
  1.2  This  is  a  purge   and  trap  gas
chromatographio (G-C)  method applicable to
the determination of the compounds listed
above in municipal and industrial discharges
as provided under 40 CFR 136.1.  When  this
method is  used  to analyze unfamiliar sam-
ples for either  or both of the compounds
above, compound identifications should be
supported by at least  one  additional quali-
tative technique. This method describes ana-
lytical   conditions   for   a   second  gas
chromatographic column that can be used to
confirm measurements made with the  pri-
mary column. Method  624 provides gas chro-
matograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) con-
ditions  appropriate for the qualitative  and
quantitative confirmation of results for the
parameters listed above, if  used with the
purge and  trap conditions  described in  this
method.
  1.3  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined in Section 12.1)'  for each parameter is
listed in Table  1. The MDL for a  specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending upon  the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.4  Any modification of this method,  be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered  as  a  major modification subject to
application and approval of alternate  test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.5  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the supervision of  analysts experi-
enced in the operation of a  purge and trap
system  and a gas chromatograph and in the
interpretation of gas chromatograms. Each
analyst must demonstrate the ability to gen-
erate acceptable results with  this  method
using the procedure described in Section 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  An inert gas is bubbled through a 5-mL
water sample contained in  a heated purging
chamber.   Acrolein  and  acrylonitrile   are
transferred from the aqueous phase  to the
vapor phase.  The vapor is  swept through a
sorbent trap where the analytes are trapped.
After the  purge is completed,  the trap is
heated and backflushed with the inert gas to
desorb   the   compound    onto   a  gas
chromatographic column.   The  gas chro-
matograph is temperature  programmed to
separate  the analytes which are then  de-
tected with a flame ionization detector.2-3
  2.2  The method provides  an optional  gas
chromatographic  column that may be help-
ful  in resolving the compounds of interest
from the interferences that may occur.

              3. Interferences

  3.1  Impurities  in the  purge gas and  or-
ganic compound outgassing from the plumb-
ing of the trap account for  the majority of
contamination problems.  The analytical sys-
tem must be demonstrated  to be  free from
contamination  under  the conditions  of  the
analysis  by running laboratory reagent
blanks as described in Section 8.1.3. The  use
of  non-Teflon  plastic  tubing,  non-Teflon
thread sealants, or flow controllers with rub-
ber components in the purge and trap system
should be avoided.
  3.2  Samples can be contaminated by diffu-
sion of volatile organics through the septum
seal into the sample during shipment and
storage. A field reagent blank prepared from
reagent water and carried through the sam-
pling  and handling protocol  can  serve as a
check on such contamination.
  3.3  Contamination  by  carry-over   can
occur whenever high level and low level sam-
ples are  sequentially analyzed.  To reduce
carry-over,  the purging  device and sample
syringe must be rinsed between samples with
reagent water.  Whenever an unusually con-
centrated sample is encountered, it should be
followed by an analysis of reagent water to
check for cross contamination. For samples
containing  large  amounts of water-soluble
materials,  suspended solids, high  boiling
compounds or high analyte levels, it may be
necessary to wash the purging device with a
detergent  solution, rinse it with distilled
water, and then dry it in an oven at 105 °C be-
tween analyses. The trap and other parts of
the system are also subject to contamina-
tion,  therefore, frequent bakeout  and purg-
ing of the entire system may be required.

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or   carcinogenicity  of
each  reagent used in this method has  not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. From this view point, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest  possible level  by  whatever means
available. The  laboratory is responsible  for
maintaining a current  awareness  file  of
OSHA regulations regarding the  safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made available to all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional  references to laboratory safety
are available and have been identified4 6 for
the information of the analyst.
                                          66

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 603
         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling equipment, for discrete sam-
pling.
  5.1.1   Vial—25-rnL  capacity   or  larger,
equipped with a screw cap with a hole in the
center (Pierce #13075 or equivalent). Deter-
gent wash, rinse with tap and distilled water,
and dry at 105 °C before use.
  5.1.2   Septum—Teflon-faced       silicone
(Pierce  #12722  or  equivalent).  Detergent
wash, rinse with tap and distilled water and
dry at  105 °C for 1 h before use.
  5.2  Purge and trap system—The purge and
trap system consists of three separate pieces
of  equipment: a purging  device, trap, and
desorber. Several complete systems are now
commercially available.
  5.2.1   The purging device must be designed
to accept 5-mL, samples with a water column
at least 3  cm deep. The gaseous head space
between the water column and the trap must
have a total volume of less than 15 mL. The
purge gas must pass through the water col-
umn as finely divided bubbles with  a diame-
ter of less than 3 mm  at the origin.  The
purge gas must be  introduced no more than
5 mm  from the base of the water column.
The purging device must be capable of being
heated to 85 °C within 3.0 min after transfer
of  the  sample  to  the  purging  device  and
being held at 85 ±2 °C during the purge cycle.
The entire water column in the purging de-
vice must be heated. Design of this  modifica-
tion to the standard purging  device  is op-
tional, however, use of a  water bath is  sug-
gested.
  5.2.1.1  Heating mantle—To be used to heat
water bath.
  5.2.1.2  Temperature controller—Equipped
with thermocouple/sensor to accurately con-
trol water bath temperature to ±2 °C.  The
purging device illustrated  in Figure 1 meets
these design criteria.
  5.2.2   The trap must be at least 25 cm long
and have an inside  diameter of at least 0.105
in.  The trap must  be packed to contain 1.0
cm of  methyl silicone coated packing  (Sec-
tion 6.5.2) and 23 cm of 2,6-diphenylene oxide
polymer (Section 6.5.1). The minimum speci-
fications for the trap are illustrated in Fig-
ure 2.
  5.2.3   The desorber must be capable of rap-
idly heating the trap  to 180 "C, The desorber
illustrated in Figure 2 meets these design
criteria.
  5.2.4  The purge and trap system may be
assembled as a separate unit as illustrated in
Figure  3  or  be coupled to  a gas  chro-
matograph.
  5.3  pH paper—Narrow pH range,  about 3.5
to 5.5 (Fisher Scientific Short Range Alkacid
No. 2, #14-837-2 or equivalent).
  5.4  Gas  chromatograph—An  analytical
system complete with  a  temperature pro-
grammable gas chromatograph suitable for
on-column injection and all required acces-
sories including  syringes,  analytical  col-
umns, gases,  detector,  and strip-chart  re-
corder. A data  system is recommended  for
measuring peak areas.
  5.4.1 Column  1—10 ft long x 2 mm ID glass
or stainless steel, packed with Porapak-QS
(80/100 mesh) or  equivalent. This column was
used  to  develop  the method  performance
statements in Section 12. Guidelines for the
use of alternate column packings  are pro-
vided in Section 10.1.
  5.4.2 Column  2—6 ft long x 0.1 in. ID glass
or stainless steel, packed with Chromosorb
101 (60/80 mesh) or equivalent.
  5.4.3 Detector—Flame ionization detector.
This type of detector has proven effective in
the analysis of  wastewaters for  the param-
eters  listed in the  scope  (Section 1.1), and
was used to develop  the method performance
statements in Section 12. Guidelines for the
use of alternate detectors are provided in
Section 10.1.
  5.5   Syringes—5-mL,   glass   hypodermic
with Luerlok tip (two each).
  5.6  Micro syringes—25-|iL, 0.006 in. ID nee-
dle.
  5.7  Syringe valve—2-way, with Luer ends
(three each).
  5.8  Bottle—15-mL, screw-cap, with Teflon
cap liner.
  5.9  Balance—Analytical, capable  of  accu-
rately weighing  0.0001 g.

                6. Reagents

  6.1  Reagent water—Reagent water is de-
fined  as  a water in  which an  interferent is
not observed at the  MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.1.1 Reagent water can be  generated by
passing tap water through a carbon filter bed
containing about  1  Ib of activated carbon
(Filtrasorb-300, Calgon Corp., or equivalent).
  6.1.2 A   water    purification    system
(Millipore Super-Q  or equivalent)  may  be
used to generate reagent water.
  6.1.3 Regent water may also be prepared
by boiling water for 15 min. Subsequently,
while maintaining the temperature at 90 °C,
bubble a contaminant-free inert gas through
the water for 1 h. While still hot,  transfer
the water to a narrow mouth screw-cap bot-
tle and seal with a Teflon-lined septum and
cap.
  6.2  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.3  Sodium hydroxide solution (10 N)—
Dissolve 40 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 100 mL.
  6.4  Hydrochloric  acid  (1+1)—Slowly, add
50 mL of concentrated HC1 (ACS) to 50 mL of
reagent water.
  6.5  Trap Materials:
  6.5.1 2,6-Diphenylene   oxide   polymer—
Tenax (60/80  mesh),  chromatographic grade
or equivalent.
  6.5.2 Methyl silicone packing—3% OV-1 on
Chromosorb-W (60/80 mesh) or equivalent.
                                          67

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 603
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  6.6  Stock    standard   solutions—Stock
standard  solutions may  be prepared from
pure standard materials or purchased as cer-
tified solutions. Prepare stock standard solu-
tions in reagent water using assayed liquids.
Since   acrolein   and  acrylonitrile   are
lachrymators,  primary  dilutions  of these
compounds should be prepared in a hood. A
NIOSH/MESA approved toxic  gas respirator
should be used when  the  analyst handles
high concentrations of such materials.
  6.6.1 Place about 9.8 mL of reagent water
into a 10-mL ground  glass stoppered volu-
metric flask. For acrolein standards the rea-
gent water must be adjusted to pH 4 to 5.
Weight the flask to the nearest 0.1 mg.
  6.6.2 Using a 100-uL syringe, immediately
add two  or more drops of assayed  reference
material to the flask,  then reweigh. Be sure
that the drops fall directly into the water
without contacting the neck of the flask.
  6.6.3 Reweigh,  dilute to volume, stopper,
then  mix  by  inverting  the  flask  several
times. Calculate the concentration in ug/M-L
from the net gain in weight. When compound
purity is  assayed to be 96% or  greater,  the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate  the  concentration  of   the  stock
staldard.  Optionally,  stock standard solu-
tions may be prepared using the pure stand-
ard material  by volumetrically measuring
the appropriate amounts and  determining
the weight of the material using the density
of  the   material.  Commercially  prepared
stock standards may  be used  at  any con-
centration if  they are  certified by  the
manufactaurer or by an independent source.
  6.6.4 Transfer the stock standard solution
into a Teflon-sealed screw-cap bottle. Store
at 4 °C and protect from light.
  6.6.5 Prepare fresh standards daily.
  6.7  Secondary  dilution standards—Using
stock standard solutions, prepare secondary
dilution standards in reagent water that con-
tain the compounds of interest, either singly
or mixed together. The secondary dilution
standards should be prepared at concentra-
tions such  that  the  aqueous  calibration
standards prepared in Section  7.3.1 or 7.4.1
will  bracket  the working range of the ana-
lytical system. Secondary dilution standards
should be prepared daily and stored at 4 °C.
  6.8  Quality  control check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section  8.2.1.

               7. Calibration
  7.1  Assemble a purge and trap system that
meets the specifications in Section 5.2. Con-
dition the  trap  overnight at  180 °C  by
backflushing with  an inert gas flow of at
least  20  mL/min. Condition the trap for 10
min once daily prior to use.
  7.2  Connect  the purge and trap system to
a  gas   chromatograph.   The   gas  chro-
matograph must be operated using tempera-
ture and flow rate conditions equivalent to
those given in Table 1. Calibrate the purge
and trap-gas chromatographic system using
either the external standard technique (Sec-
tion 7.3) or  the internal standard technique
(Section 7.4).
  7.3  External standard  calibration proce-
dure:
  7.3.1  Prepare  calibration standards at  a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each parameter by carefully adding 20.0 uL of
one or more secondary dilution standards to
100, 500, or 1000 mL of reagent water. A 25-p.L
syringe  with a 0.006 in. ID needle should be
used for this operation. One of the external
standards should be at a concentration near,
but above, the MDL and the other concentra-
tions  should  correspond  to  the  expected
range of concentrations found in real sam-
ples or  should define the working range of
the detector. These standards must be pre-
pared fresh daily.
  7.3.2  Analyze  each  calibration  standard
according to Section 10, and tabulate peak
height  or  area  responses versus the  con-
centration of the  standard. The results  can
be used to  prepare a  calibration curve for
each compound. Alternatively, if the ratio of
response to concentration (calibration fac-
tor) is a constant  over the working range (<
10% relative standard deviation, RSD),  lin-
earity through the origin can be assumed
and the average ratio or calibration factor
can be used in place of a calibration curve.
  7.4  Internal  standard calibration proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select one or more internal standards that
are similar in analytical behavior  to  the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate  that  the  measurement of
the internal  standard  is not affected  by
method or matrix  interferences.  Because of
these limitations,  no internal standard  can
be suggested that  is applicable to all sam-
ples.
  7.4.1   Prepare  calibration standards at  a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each parameter of interest as described in
Section 7.3.1.
  7.4.2   Prepare  a  spiking  solution  con-
taining  each of the internal standards using
the procedures described in Sections 6.6  and
6.7. It is recommended that the secondary di-
lution standard be prepared at a concentra-
tion of  15 (ig/mLi  of each internal standard
compound.  The  addition of 10  uL of this
standard to 5.0 mL of sample or  calibration
standard would be  equivalent to 30 |ig/L.
  7.4.3   Analyze  each  calibration  standard
according to Section 10, adding 10 uL of in-
ternal standard spiking solution  directly to
the syringe (Section  10.4).  Tabulate peak
height or area responses against concentra-
tion for each compound and internal stand-
ard, and calculate response factors (BF) for
each compound using Equation 1.
                                          68

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 603
        RF=
                                Equation 1

where:
As=Response for the parameter to  be  meas-
  ured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
C,.,=Concentration of the internal standard.
C9=Concentration  of  the parameter  to  be
  measured.
If the RF value over the working range is a
constant (<10% RSD), the RF can be assumed
to be invariant and the  average RF can be
used for calculations. Alternatively, the re-
sults can be used to plot a calibration curve
of response ratios, AJA,S, vs. RF.
  7.5  The  working calibration curve, cali-
bration factor, or  RF must be  verified  on
each working day by the measurement of a
QC check sample.
  7.5.1   Prepare the QC check sample  as de-
scribed  in Section 8.2.2.
  7.5.2   Analyze the QC check sample accord-
ing to Section 10.
  7.5.3   For each parameter, compare the re-
sponse  (Q) with the  corresponding calibra-
tion acceptance criteria  found  in Table 2. If
the responses for all  parameters of interest
fall within the designated ranges, analysis of
actual samples can  begin. If any individual Q
falls outside  the range, a  new  calibration
curve, calibration factor, or RF must be pre-
pared for that parameter according to Sec-
tion 7.3 or 7.4.

             8. Quality Control
  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of spiked  samples  to  evaluate and
document data quality. The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks  are  compared with  established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics  of the method. When results of sample
spikes  indicate atypical method  perform-
ance, a  quality control check standard must
be analyzed  to confirm  that the  measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1   The analyst must  make an initial,
one-time, demonstration of the ability  to
generate acceptable accuracy and  precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2   In recognition of advances  that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain  options  (detailed in Sec-
tion 10.1) to improve the separations or lower
the cost of measurements. Each time such a
modification is made to the method, the ana-
lyst is required to repeat the procedure in
Section 8.2.
  8.1.3 Each day, the analyst must analyze a
reagent water blank  to  demonstrate  that
interferences from the analytical system are
under control.
  8.1.4 The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike and analyze a minimum  of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality.  This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5 The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4. The frequency  of the  check standard
analyses is equivalent to  10% of all samples
analyzed but may  be reduced  if spike recov-
eries  from  samples (Section 8.3) meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6 The  laboratory must  maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish the ability  to generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1 A quality control  (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing each pa-
rameter of interest at a concentration of 25
ug/mL in reagent water. The QC check sam-
ple concentrate must  be  obtained from the
U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency, En-
vironmental  Monitoring  and Support  Lab-
oratory in Cincinnati, Ohio, if  available. If
not available from that source, the QC check
sample concentrate must be  obtained from
another  external  source.  If  not available
from either source above,  the QC check sam-
ple concentrate must be prepared by the lab-
oratory using stock standards prepared inde-
pendently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2 Prepare a  QC  check sample to  con-
tain 50 ng/L  of each parameter by adding 200
^L of QC check sample concentrate to 100 mL
of reagent water.
  8.2.3 Analyze four 5-mL  aliquots  of  the
well-mixed QC check  sample  according  to
Section 10.
  8.2.4 Calculate the average recovery (X) in
|ig/L,  and the standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in ug/L, for  each parameter using
the four results.
  8.2.5  For each parameter compare s and X
with the  corresponding acceptance criteria
for  precision   and accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 3. If s  and X  for all param-
eters  of  interest meet the acceptance cri-
teria, the system performance is acceptable
and analysis of actual samples can begin. If
either s exceeds the precision limit or X falls
outside  the  range  for  accuracy, the system
performance is unacceptable for that param-
eter. Locate and correct  the source  of the
                                          69

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 603
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
problem  and repeat  the  test for each com-
pound of interest.
  8.3  The laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike  at least 10% of the samples from
each sample site being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing  one to
ten samples per month, at least one  spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1  The  concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If,  as in  compliance  monitoring,
the concentration of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit, the spike  should
be at that limit or 1 to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If  the concentration  of a specific
parameter   in  the  sample  is  not  being
checked  against a limit specific to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at 50 ng/L or  1
to 5 times higher than the background con-
centration   determined  in  Section  8.3.2,
whichever concentration would be larger.
  8.3.2  Analyze one 5-mL sample aliquot to
determine the background concentration (B)
of each parameter. If necessary, prepare  a
new QC  check sample concentrate (Section
8.2.1) appropriate for the  background  con-
centrations  in the sample. Spike a second 5-
mL  sample  aliquot  with 10 uL of the QC
check sample concentrate and analyze it to
determine the  concentration after spiking
(A) of  each  parameter. Calculate each per-
cent recovery (P) as 100(A-B)%/T, where T is
the known true value of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter  with the corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 3. These
acceptance  criteria were calculated  to in-
clude an allowance for error in measurement
of both the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent that the analyst's  spike to back-
ground ratio approaches 5:1.7
  8.3.4  If any individual P falls outside the
designated range for  recovery, that param-
eter has failed  the  acceptance criteria.  A
check standard  containing  each parameter
that failed the criteria must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails  the acceptance
criteria for  recovery in Section 8.3, a QC
check standard  containing  each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC  check standard will depend upon
the  number of  parameters  being  simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the  sample
matrix, and the performance of the labora-
tory.
  8.4.1  Prepare  the  QC  check standard by
adding 10 uL of QC check  sample concentrate
(Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 5  mL of reagent
water. The QC check standard needs only to
contain the parameters that failed criteria
in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2  Analyze  the QC  check standard to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3  Compare the  percent  recovery (P,)
for  each parameter with  the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 3. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared  with these  criteria. If
the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
side the designated range, the  laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control,  and the problem  must be
immediately  identified and corrected.  The
analytical result for that parameter  in the
unspiked sample is suspect and may  not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,  method  accuracy for wastewater
samples must be assessed and records must
be  maintained.  After  the analysis  of five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate the average percent  recovery (P)
and the standard deviation of the  percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy ass_essment
as a percent recovery interval from P-2Sp to
P+2sp. If P=90% and sp=10%, for  example, the
accuracy interval  is  expressed  as  70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on a regular basis (e.g.  after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6  It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for  use with this method. The specific prac-
tices that are most productive  depend upon
the needs of the  laboratory and the nature of
the samples.  Field duplicates may be  ana-
lyzed to assess the precision of the  environ-
mental  measurements. When  doubt  exists
over the identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas chromatography with a dissimilar col-
umn or  mass spectrometer must be used.
Whenever  possible, the laboratory  should
analyze standard  reference materials  and
participate in relevant performance evalua-
tion studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                Handling

  9.1  All  samples must be iced or  refrig-
erated from the time of collection until anal-
ysis. If the sample contains free or combined
chlorine, add sodium  thiosulfate preserva-
tive (10 mg/40 mL is  sufficient for up  to  5
ppm CU) to  the empty  sample bottle just
prior to shipping to the sampling site. EPA
Methods 330.4 and 330.5  may  be used  for
measurement of residual chlorine.8 Field test
kits are available for this purpose.
  9.2  If acrolein is to be analyzed,  collect
about 500 mL of sample in a clean glass con-
tainer. Adjust the  pH  of the sample  to 4 to  5
using acid or base, measuring  with narrow
                                          70

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 603
range pH paper.  Samples for acrolein anal-
ysis receiving no pH adjustment  must  be
analyzed within 3 days of sampling.
  9.3  Grab  samples  must  be collected  in
glass containers having1 a total volume of at
least 25 mL. Fill the  sample bottle just  to
overflowing in such a manner  that  no air
bubbles pass through the  sample as the bot-
tle is being filled. Seal the bottle so that  no
air bubbles  are entrapped in it. If preserva-
tive has been added, shake vigorously for 1
min. Maintain the hermetic seal on the sam-
ple bottle until time of analysis.
  9.4  All samples must be analyzed  within
14 days of collection.3

               10. Procedure
  10.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions   for  the  gas  chro-
matograph.  Included  in this table  are  esti-
mated retention times and MDL that can be
achieved under these conditions. An example
of the  separations achieved by Column 1 is
shown  in Figure 5.  Other packed columns,
chromatographlc conditions, or detectors
may be used if the requirements of Section
8.2 are met.
  10.2  Calibrate  the   system daily as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  10.3 Adjust the purge gas (nitrogen or he-
lium) flow  rate to 20 mL-min. Attach the
trap inlet to the purging device, and set the
purge and trap system to purge (Figure  3).
Open the syringe valve located on the purg-
ing device sample introduction needle.
  10.4  Remove the  plunger from a 5-mL sy-
ringe and attach a closed syringe valve. Open
the sample bottle (or standard) and carefully
pour the sample  into  the syringe barrel  to
just short of  overflowing.  Replace the  sy-
ringe plunger and compress the sample. Open
the syringe  valve and  vent any residual air
while adjusting the sample volume to 5.0 mL.
Since this process of taking an  aliquot de-
stroys the validity  of  the sample for future
analysis, the analyst should fill a second sy-
ringe at this time to protect against possible
loss of  data.  Add  10.0 jiL of the  internal
standard spiking solution (Section 7.4.2), if
applicable, through the valve bore then close
the valve.
  10.5 Attach the syringe-syringe valve as-
sembly to the syringe valve on  the purging
device. Open the syringe valves and inject
the sample into the purging chamber.
  10.6 Close both valves and purge the sam-
ple for 15.0 ± 0.1 min while heating  at 85 ± 2
°C.
  10.7 After the  15-min purge time, attach
the trap to the chromatograph,  adjust the
purge and trap system to the desorb  mode
(Figure  4),  and begin to temperature  pro-
gram the gas  chromatograph. Introduce the
trapped materials to the GO column by rap-
idly heating  the  trap  to  180 °C  while
backflushing the  trap  with an inert gas be-
tween 20 and 60 mL/min for 1.5 min.
  10.8  While the trap is being desorbed into
the gas chromatograph, empty  the purging
chamber using the sample introduction sy-
ringe.  Wash the  chamber  with two 5-mL
flushes of reagent water.
  10.9  After desorbing the  sample  for 1.5
min, recondition the trap by returning the
purge  and  trap  system to the purge mode.
Wait 15 s then close the syringe valve on the
purging device to begin gas flow through the
trap. The trap temperature should  be main-
tained at 210 °C. After approximately 7  min,
turn off the trap heater and open the syringe
valve to stop the gas flow through  the trap.
When the trap is cool,  the next sample can
be analyzed.
  10.10  Identify the  parameters in  the sam-
ple by comparing the retention times of the
peaks  in  the sample  chromatogram  with
those   of   the    peaks   in    standard
chromatograms. The width of the retention
time window used to make identifications
should be based upon measurements of ac-
tual retention time  variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three times the
standard deviation of a retention time for  a
compound  can be used to calculate a  sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the  analyst should weigh heavily in the
interpretation of chromatograms.

              11. Calculations
  11.1  Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual  compounds in  the sample.
  11.1.1 If  the external standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion of the  parameter being measured from
the  peak  response  using  the  calibration
curve  or calibration factor determined in
Section 7.3.2.
  11.1.2 If  the internal standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined in Section  7.4.3 and Equa-
tion 2.
    Concentration (|0,g/L) =
(AS)(C1S)

(AIS)(RF)
                                Equation 2

where:
As=Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration of the internal standard.
  11.2 Report results in ug/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          12. Method Performance

  12.1 The method  detection limit (MDL) is
defined  as the minimum concentration of  a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that  the value is above
                                          71

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 603
                                                          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                              tion, Committee on  Chemical Safety,  3rd
                                              Edition, 1979.
                                                7. Provost, L.P., and Elder, R.S.  "Interpre-
                                              tation of Percent Recovery Data," American
                                              Laboratory, 15, 58-63 (1983).
                                                8.  "Methods 330.4  (Titrimetric, DPD-FAS)
                                              and   330.5 (Spectrophotometric,  DPD)  for
                                              Chlorine,  Total Residual,"   Methods  for
                                              Chemical  Analysis of  Water and Wastes,
                                              EPA-600/4-79-020, U.S.  Environmental Pro-
                                              tection  Agency, Environmental Monitoring
                                              and  Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati, Ohio
                                              45268, March 1979.
                                                9.  "Evaluation of Method 603 (Modified),"
                                              EPA-600/4-84-ABC, National Technical Infor-
                                              mation Service, PB84-,  Springfield, Virginia
                                              22161, Nov. 1984.

                                              TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND
                                                        METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
zero.1  The  MDL  concentrations listed in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.9
The MDL actually achieved in a given anal-
ysis will vary depending on instrument sen-
sitivity and matrix effects.
  12.2  This method is recommended for the
concentration  range  from   the MDL to
l,OOOxMDL.  Direct aqueous injection  tech-
niques should be used to measure concentra-
tion levels above l.OOOxMDL.
  12.3  In a  single laboratory (Battelle-Co-
lumbus). the average recoveries and standard
deviations presented in  Table 2 were ob-
tained.9  Seven replicate samples were  ana-
lyzed at each spike level.

                 References

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. Bellar, T.A., and Lichtenberg, J.J. "De-
termining Volatile Organics at Microgram-
per-Litre-Levels  by  Gas Chromatography,"
Journal American Water Works  Association, 66,
739 (1974).
  3. "Evaluate Test Procedures for Acrolein
and Acrylonitrile," Special letter report for
EPA  Project  4719-A, U.S.  Environmental
Protection  Agency,   Environmental  Moni-
toring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati,
Ohio 45268, 27 June 1979.
  4.  "Carcinogens—Working  With Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare,  Public  Health  Service, Center for
Disease Control,  National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  5. "OSHA  Safety  and  Health Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR part  1910), Occu-
pational Safety  and  Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-

            TABLE 2—SINGLE LABORATORY ACCURACY AND PRECISION—METHOD 603
Parameter
Acrolein
Acrylonrtnle
Retention time (mm)
Column 1
106
12.7
Column 2
8.2
9.8
Method
detection
limit (ug/L)
07
05
                                                Column 1 conditions Porapak-QS (80/100 mesh) packed in
                                              a 10 ft x 2 mm ID glass or stainless steel column with helium
                                              carrier gas at 30 mL/mm flow rate Column temperature held
                                              isothermal at 110 °C for  1 5 min (during desorption),  then
                                              heated as rapidly as possible to 150 C and held for 20 min,
                                              column bakeout at 190 °C for 10 mm.9
                                                Column 2  conditions:  Chromosorb 101  (60/80 mesh)
                                              packed in a 6 ft x 0 1 in  ID glass or stainless steel column
                                              with helium carrier gas at 40 mL/mm flow rate  Column tem-
                                              perature held tsothermal at 80 °C for 4 mm, then programed
                                              at 50 °C/mm to 120 °C and held for 12 mm.
Parameter
Acrolein . . . . 	





Acrylonitrile .




Sample
matrix
RW
RW
POTW
POTW
IW
IW
RW
RW
POTW
POTW
IW
IW
Spike
cone.
(ng/L)
50
50.0
50
500
50
1000
5.0
500
20.0
1000
100
1000
Average
recovery
(H9/L)
52
51 4
40
444
01
9.3
4.2
51.4
20.1
101 3
9.1
1040
Standard
deviation
(H9/L)
0.2
0.7
02
08
0.1
1.1
02
1 5
0.8
1 5
08
32
Average
percent
recovery
104
103
80
89
2
9
84
103
100
101
91
104
  ARW=Reagent water
  APOTW=Prechlonnation secondary effluent from a municipal sewage treatment plant
  AIW=lndustrial wastewater containing an unidentified acrolein reactant

             TABLE 3—CALIBRATION AND QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 603 A
Parameter
Acrolein 	 . . 	
Range for Q
(ug/L)
45 9-54.1
Limit for
S (jig/L)
46
Range for X
(iig/L)
42.9-60.1
Range for
P, P, (%)
88-118
                                            72

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                      Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 603
     TABLE 3—CALIBRATION AND QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 603*—Continued
Parameter
Acrylonitnle .... 	 	
Range for Q
(W/L)
41.2-588
Limit for
S (ng/L)
99
Range for X
(ng/L)
33 1-69.9
Range for
P, P, (%)
71-135
 "=Cntena were calculated assuming a QC check sample concentration of 50 ng/L.'
 Q=Concentration measured in QC check sample, in ng/L (Section 7.5.3)
 s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 8.2 4)
 X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 824)
 P, P,=Pen;ent recovery measured (Section 832, Section 8 4.2)
       OPTIONAL
       FOAM
       TRAP
-EXIT % IN.
      0. D.
                         —-14MM 0.  D.
                          INLET % IN.
                                0. D.
   '/< IN.
   0.  D. EXIT
    SAMPLE INLET

    2-WAY SYRINGE VALVE
     17CM. 20 GAUGE SYRINGE NEEDLE

    6MM. 0. D. RUBBER SEPTUM
                                        . 0. D.
                                     INLET
                                     1/4 IN. 0. D.
                         1/16 IN. O.D.
                        /STAINLESS STEEL
     10MM GLASS FRIT
     MEDIUM POROSITY
                                                   13X MOLECULAR
                                                   SIEVE PURGE
                                                   GAS FILTER
                                                      PURGE GAS
                                                  "*~]FLOW
                                                      CONTROL
                  Figure 1.  Purging device.
                                  73

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 603
                               40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 PACKING PROCEDURE
GLASS
WOOL
     TENAX 23CM
     3% OV-1
 GLASS WOOL
      1CMJ
            5MM
                          CONSTRUCTION
                                 COMPRESSION FITTING
                                 NUT AND FERRULES
                                   14FT.7A/FOOT RESISTANCE
                                  'WIRE WRAPPED SOLID

                                   THERMOCOUPLE/
                                   CONTROLLER
                                   SENSOR
               TRAP INLET
                                ELECTRONIC
                                TEMPERATURE
                                CONTROL
                                AND
                                PYROMETER
TUBING 25CM.
0.105 IN. I.D.
0.125 IN. O.D.
STAINLESS STEEL
  Figure 2. Trap packings and construction to include
           desorb capability.
                            74

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
     Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 603
             13X MOLECULAR
              SIEVE FILTER
GC INJECTION
   PORT
                    Figure 3. Purge and trap system-purge mode.
            13X MOLECULAR
             SIEVE FILTER
GC INJECTION
   PORT
                            2-POSITION
                           (-PORT VALVE
                            COUNTER-
                            CLOCKWISE
                            ROTATION
                                                       HEATED
                                                     WATER BATH
                     Figure 4. Purge and trap system-desorb mode.
                                      75

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
                     40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
          Column: Porapak-QS
          Program: 110°C for  1.5 min, rapidly
                    heated to 150°C
          Detector: Flame lonization
                                                                       UJ
                          1
                         4.5
 T
6.0
  II       111^
7.5    9.0    10.5   12.0   13.5   15.0
       1.5    3.0
                          RETENTION TIME,  MIN.
Figure 5. Gas chromatogram of acroiein and acrylonitrile.
          METHOD 604—PHENOLS

          1. Scope and Application
  1.1 This method covers the determination
of phenol and certain  substituted phenols.
The  following parameters  may  be deter-
mined by this method:
Parameter
4-Chloro-3-methy!phenol 	
2— Chlorophenol . . .
2,4-Dichtorophenol . .
2,4-Dimethytphenol
2,4-Dmitrophenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dmitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol 	
4-Nitrophenol 	
Pentachlorophenol . ....
Phenol 	
2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol . .
STORET
No
34452
34586
34601
34606
34616
34657
34591
34646
39032
34694
34621
CAS No
59-50-7
95-57-8
120-83-2
105-67-9
51-28-5
534-52-1
88-75-5
100-02-7
87-86-5
108-95-2
88-06-2
  1.2 This is a flame ionization detector gas
chromatographic (FIDGC) method applicable
to the determination of the compounds listed
above in municipal and industrial discharges
as provided under 40 CFR 136.1.  When this
           method is used to analyze unfamiliar sam-
           ples for any or all of the compounds above,
           compound  identifications  should  be sup-
           ported by at least one additional qualitative
           technique. This method describes analytical
           conditions  for derivatization, cleanup, and
           electron capture  detector  gas   chroma-
           tography (ECDGC) that can be used to con-
           firm measurements made by FIDGC. Method
           625 provides gas chromatograph/mass spec-
           trometer (GC/MS) conditions appropriate for
           the qualitative and  quantitative confirma-
           tion of results for all of the parameters list-
           ed above, using the extract produced by this
           method.
            1.3 The method detection limit (MDL, de-
           fined in Section 14.1)1 for each parameter is
           listed  in Table 1.  The MDL  for a  specific
           wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
           pending upon the nature  of interferences in
           the sample  matrix. The MDL listed in Table
           1 for each  parameter was  achieved with  a
           flame  ionization detector  (FID). The MDLs
           that were achieved when the  derivatization
           cleanup and electron  capture detector (ECD)
           were employed are presented in Table 2.
                                        76

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
  1.4  Any  modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as  a major modification subject to
application and approval of alternate test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.5  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the  supervision  of analysts experi-
enced in the use of a gas chromatograph and
in the interpretation  of gas chromatograms.
Each  analyst must demonstrate the ability
to  generate  acceptable  results with  this
method using the procedure described in Sec-
tion 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A  measured  volume  of  sample,  ap-
proximately 1-L, is  acidified and extracted
with methylene chloride using a separatory
funnel. The methylene  chloride extract is
dried  and  exchanged to  2-propanol during
concentration to a volume of 10 mL or less.
The extract is separated by  gas  chroma-
tography and the phenols are then measured
with an FID.2
  2.2  A  preliminary  sample  wash under
basic conditions can be employed for samples
having high general organic and organic base
interferences.
  2.3  The  method   also  provides  for  a
derivatization  and  column  chromatography
cleanup procedure to aid in the elimination
of interferences.2-3 The  derivatives are  ana-
lyzed  by ECDGC.

               3. Interferences
  3.1  Method interferences may be caused
by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that lead  to discrete artifacts  and/or  ele-
vated baselines in gas chromatograms. All of
these   materials must  be  routinely  dem-
onstrated to be free from interferences under
the conditions  of the analysis by  running
laboratory reagent blanks  as  described in
Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1 Glassware  must   be  scrupulously
cleaned.4 Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
sible after use  by rinsing with the last sol-
vent used in it. Solvent rinsing  should be fol-
lowed by detergent washing with hot water,
and rinses with  tap water   and  distilled
water. The glassware should then be drained
dry, and heated in a muffle furnace at 400 °C
for 15 to 30 min. Some thermally stable ma-
terials, such as PCBs, may not  be eliminated
by  this treatment.  Solvent rinses with ace-
tone and  pesticide quality hexane  may be
substituted for  the muffle furnace heating.
Thorough rinsing with such solvents usually
eliminates   PCB interference. Volumetric
ware  should not be heated  in  a muffle fur-
nace.  After drying  and  cooling, glassware
should be sealed and  stored in  a clean envi-
ronment to  prevent any accumulation of
dust or other contaminants. Store inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2  The use of high purity reagents and
solvents helps to minimize interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required.
  3.2 Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are coextracted from the
sample. The extent of  matrix interferences
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending upon the nature and diversity of
the industrial complex or municipality being
sampled. The derivatization  cleanup proce-
dure in Section 12 can  be used to overcome
many of these interferences, but unique sam-
ples  may  require  additional cleanup  ap-
proaches to achieve the MDL  listed in Tables
1 and 2.
  3.3 The basic sample wash (Section 10.2)
may cause significantly reduced recovery of
phenol and  2,4-dimethylphenol. The analyst
must recognize that results  obtained  under
these  conditions  are  minimum concentra-
tions.

                 4. Safety

  4.1 The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity  of
each reagent used  in  this method has  not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. Prom this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The laboratory is  responsible for
maintaining a current awareness file  of
OSHA  regulations regarding the  safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets  should also be made  available  to all
personnel involved in the  chemical analysis.
Additional references  to  laboratory safety
are available and have been identified5—7 for
the information of analyst.
  4.2 Special care should be taken in han-
dling pentafluorobenzyl bromide, which is  a
lachrymator, and 18-orown-6-ether, which is
highly  toxic.

         5. Apparatus and Materials
  5.1 Sampling equipment,  for discrete  or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1  Grab sample  bottle—1-L  or 1-qt,
amber  glass, fitted with  a screw cap lined
with Teflon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If amber
bottles are not available, protect samples
from light. The bottle  and cap liner must be
washed, rinsed with acetone or methylene
chloride, and dried before use to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2  Automatic  sampler  (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample con-
tainers for the collection of a minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4°C and protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler uses
a peristaltic pump, a  minimum  length of
compressible silicone rubber  tubing may be
                                          77

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
used. Before use, however, the compressible
tubing  should be  thoroughly  rinsed  with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize the potential for
contamination of the sample. An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All specifications  are  sug-
gested.  Catalog numbers are included for il-
lustration only.):
  5.2.1  Separatory funnel—2-L, with Tenon
stopcock.
  5.2.2  Drying   column—Chromatographic
column, 400 mm long x 19 mm ID, with coarse
frit filter disc.
  5.2.3  Chromatographic   column—100   mm
long x 10 mm ID, with Teflon stopcock.
  5.2.4  Concentrator  tube,   Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL, graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration must be  checked
at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass stopper is used to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.5  Evaporative flask,  Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL  (Kontes K-570001-0500 or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.6  Snyder  column,   Kuderna-Danish—
Three-ball  macro  (Kontes K-503000-0121 or
equivalent).
  5.2.7  Snyder  column,   Kuderna-Danish—
Two-ball  micro  (Kontes  K-569001-0219  or
equivalent).
  5.2.8  Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.2.9  Reaction  flask—15 to  25-mL round
bottom  flask,  with standard  tapered  joint,
fitted with a water-cooled condenser and U-
shaped drying tube containing granular cal-
cium chloride.
  5.3  Boiling  chips—Approximately   10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C for 30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water bath—Heated, with concentric
ring cover, capable of temperature control
(±2°C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5  Balance—Analytical, capable  of accu-
rately weighting 0.0001 g.
  5.6  Gas   chromatograph—An   analytical
system  complete  with  a  temperature  pro-
grammable  gas chromatograph suitable for
on-column injection and all required acces-
sories  including syringes, analytical   col-
umns,  gases,  detector, and  strip-chart  re-
corder.  A data system  is  recommended for
measuring peak areas.
  5.6.1   Column for underivatized phenols—
1.8 m long  x 2 mm ID glass, packed  with 1%
SP-1240DA on  Supelcoport (80/100 mesh) or
equivalent. This column was used to develop
the method performance statements in Sec-
tion 14. Guidelines for the use  of alternate
column  packings  are provided  in  Section
11.1.
  5.6.2  Column for derivatized phenols—1.8
m long x 2 mm ID glass, packed with 5%  OV-
17 on Chromosorb W-AW-DMCS (80/100 mesh)
or equivalent. This column has proven effec-
tive in  the  analysis  of wastewaters  for
derivatization  products  of the  parameters
listed in the scope (Section 1.1), and was used
to  develop the method  performance  state-
ments in Section 14. Guidelines for the use of
alternate  column packings are provided in
Section 11.1.
  5.6.3  Detectors—Flame  ionization   and
electron capture detectors. The FID is used
when determining the parent phenols.  The
ECD   is   used   when   determining   the
derivatized phenols.  Guidelines for the use of
alternatve detectors are  provided in Section
11.1.

                6. Reagents
  6.1  Reagent  water—Reagent water  is  de-
fined as a water in which an interferent is
not observed at the MDL of  the  parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Sodium  hydroxide solution  (10 N)—
Dissolve 40 g  of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 100 mL.
  6.3  Sodium hydroxide  solution (1 N)—Dis-
solve 4 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water and
dilute to 100 mL.
  6.4  Sodium sulfate—(ACS) Granular, an-
hydrous. Purify by heating at 400°C for 4 h in
a shallow  tray.
  6.5  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS)  Granular.
  6.6  Sulfuric acid (1+1>—Slowly, add 50 mL
of H2SO4 (ACS, sp. gr. 1.84) to 50 mL of rea-
gent water.
  6.7  Sulfuric acid (1 N)—Slowly, add 58 mL
of H2SO4 (ACS, sp. gr. 1.84) to reagent water
and dilute to 1 L.
  6.8  Potassium  carbonate—(ACS)   Pow-
dered.
  6.9  Pentafluorobenzyl      bromide     (a-
Bromopeutafluorotoluene)—97%   minimum
purity.
  NOTE: This  chemical is  a lachrymator. (See
Section 4.2.)
  6.10  18-crown-6-ether         (1,4,7,10,13,16-
Hexaoxacyclooctadecane)—98%    minimum
purity.
  NOTE: This  chemical is  highly toxic.
  6.11  Derivatization reagent—Add 1 mL of
pentafluorobenzyl bromide and  1  g  of  18-
crown-6-ether to a  50-mL volumetric flask
and dilute to volume with 2-pEopanol. Pre-
pare fresh weekly. This  operation should be
carried out in a hood. Store at 4  °C and pro-
tect from  light.
  6.12  Acetone,  hexane, methanol,   meth-
ylene  chloride,  2-propanol,  toluene—Pes-
ticide quality or equivalent.
  6.13  Silica  gel—100/200 mesh,  Davison,
grade-923  or  equivalent.  Activate at 130 °C
overnight and store in a desiccator.
  6.14  Stock  standard   solutions  (1.00  jig/
|jL)—Stock standard solutions may be pre-
pared from pure standard materials or pur-
chased as  certified solutions.
  6.14.1  Prepare stock standard solutions by
accurately weighing about 0.0100 g of pure
material.  Dissolve the material in 2-propanol
                                          78

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
and dilute to volume In a 10-mL volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity is  assayed to be  96% or greater,  the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate the concentration of the stock stand-
ard. Commercially prepared stock standards
can be used at any concentration if they are
certified by the manufacturer or by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.14.2  Transfer the  stock standard solu-
tions  into Teflon-sealed  screw-cap bottles.
Store at 4 °C and protect from light. Stock
standard  solutions should  be  checked fre-
quently for signs of degradation or evapo-
ration,  especially just  prior to  preparing
calibration standards from them.
  6.14.3  Stock  standard solutions must  be
replaced after six months, or sooner if com-
parison with  check  standards  indicates  a
problem.
  6.15  Quality  control check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration
  7.1  To   calibrate   the  FIDGC  for   the
anaylsis of underivatized phenols, establish
gas chromatographic  operating  conditions
equivalent to those given in Table 1. The gas
chromatographic system can be  calibrated
using the external standard technique (Sec-
tion 7.2) or the internal standard technique
(Section 7.3).
  7.2  External standard  calibration proce-
dure for FIDGC:
  7.2.1  Prepare  calibration standards at  a
minimum of three  concentration levels for
each  parameter of interest by  adding vol-
umes  of one or more  stock standards  to  a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
2-propanol.  One  of  the external  standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the MDL  (Table 1) and the other concentra-
tions  should  correspond  to  the  expected
range of concentrations found in real sam-
ples or  should define the working range of
the detector.
  7.2.2 Using injections of 2 to 5 \il, analyze
each calibration standard according to  Sec-
tion 11 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against  the  mass  injected. The re-
sults  can be used to prepare a calibration
curve for each compound. Alternatively, if
the ratio  of response  to  amount injected
(calibration factor)  is a constant  over the
working range (<10% relative standard devi-
ation, RSD), linearity through the origin can
be assumed and the average ratio or calibra-
tion factor can be used in place of a calibra-
tion curve.
  7.3  Internal  standard calibration  proce-
dure for FIDGC—To use this  approach, the
analyst  must  select  one or more internal
standards that are similar in analytical be-
havior to the compounds of interest. The an-
alyst  must further  demonstrate  that the
measurement of the internal standard is not
affected by method or matrix interferences.
Because  of these limitations,  no internal
standard can be suggested that is applicable
to all samples.
  7.3.1 Prepare calibration standards at  a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each  parameter of interest by adding vol-
umes of one or more stock  standards to  a
volumetric flask. To each calibration stand-
ard, add a known constant amount of one or
more  internal standards, and dilute to vol-
ume with 2-propanol.  One of the standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the  MDL  and the   other  concentrations
should correspond to the expected range of
concentrations   found in  real  samples  or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
  7.3.2 Using injections of 2 to 5 H-L, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 11 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against concentration for each com-
pound and internal  standard. Calculate re-
sponse factors (RF) for each compound using
Equation 1.

        RF=    (AS)(C«)   (A,S)(CS)


                                Equation 1

where:
As=Response for the parameter to  be meas-
  ured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration  of the internal  standard
  (Hg/L).
Cs=Concentration  of  the parameter to be
  measured (|Xg/L).
  If the RF value over the working range is
a constant (<10% RSD), the RF can be as-
sumed to be invariant and the average RF
can be used for calculations.  Alternatively,
the results can be used to plot a calibration
curve of response ratios, AS/A1S, vs. RF.
  7.4  The  working calibration  curve, cali-
bration factor, or RF must be verified on
each working day by the measurement of one
or  more calibration  standards.  If the  re-
sponse for any parameter varies from the
predicted response by more than ±15%, a new
calibration curve must be prepared for that
compound.
  7.5  To calibrate the ECDGC for the anal-
ysis of phenol derivatives,  establish gas
chromatographic operating conditions equiv-
alent to those given in Table 2.
  7.5.1  Prepare  calibration standards at a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each parameter of interest by adding vol-
umes  of  one or more  stock standards to a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
2-propanol. One of the  external  standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the MDL (Table 2) and the other concentra-
tions  should correspond to  the  expected
                                          79

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 604
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
range of concentrations found in real  sam-
ples or  should define the working range of
the detector.
  7.5.2  Each  time   samples  are   to  be
derivatized, simultaneously treat a 1-mL ali-
quot  of  each  calibration standard  as de-
scribed in Section 12.
  7.5.3  After derivatization,  analyze 2 to 5
\iL of each column eluate collected according
to the method beginning in Section 12.8 and
tabulate  peak  height  or area  responses
against  the calculated equivalent mass of
underivatized  phenol injected.  The  results
can be used to prepare a calibration curve for
each compound.
  7.6  Before using any cleanup procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date elution patterns  and the  absence of
interferences from the reagents.

             8. Quality Control
  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to  operate  a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of  spiked samples to evaluate and
document data quality. The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks are  compared  with established  per-
formance  criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes indicate  atypical method  perform-
ance, a quality control  check standard must
be analyzed to confirm that the measure-
ments were  performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1  The analyst must make an  initial,
one-time, demonstration of the ability to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2  In recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.6 and  11.1) to  improve the separa-
tions or lower  the  cost of measurements.
Each time such  a modification is made to
the method, the analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3  Before  processing  any samples the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate that interferences  from the
analytical system and glassware  are under
control. Each time a  set  of samples is ex-
tracted  or reagents are changed  a reagent
water blank must be processed as a  safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4 The laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples  to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality.  This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8,3.
  8.1.5 The laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4. The  frequency  of the check standard
analyses  is equivalent to 10% of all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from  samples (Section 8.3) meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6 The laboratory must  maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish the ability  to generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1 A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing each pa-
rameter of interest at a concentration of 100
Hg/mL in 2-propanol. The  QC check sample
concentrate must be obtained from  the U.S.
Environmental Protection  Agency, Environ-
mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
in Cincinnati, Ohio, if available. If not avail-
able from that  source, the  QC check sample
concentrate must be obtained from another
external  source. If not available from  either
source above,  the  QC  check  sample con-
centrate  must be prepared  by the laboratory
using  stock standards prepared  independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2 Using a pipet, prepare QC check sam-
ples at a concentration of 100 ug/L by adding
1.00 mL of QC check sample concentrate to
each of four 1-L aliquots of  reagent water.
  8.2.3 Analyze the  well-mixed  QC  check
samples according to the method beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4 Calculate the average recovery (X) in
jig/L,  and the standard deviation  of the re-
covery (s) in (ig/L, for each parameter using
the four results.
  8.2.5 For each parameter compare s and X
with  the  corresponding acceptance criteria
for precision  and  accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 3.  If s and X for all param-
eters  of  interest meet the acceptance cri-
teria, the system performance is acceptable
and analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any individual  s exceeds the precision limit
or any individual X falls outside the range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter.
  NOTE: The large number of parameters in
Talbe  3  present a  substantial probability
that one or more will fail at least one of the
acceptance criteria when all parameters are
analyzed.
  8.2.6 When one or more  of the parameters
tested fail at least one of the acceptance cri-
teria, the analyst must proceed  according to
Section 8.2.6.1 or 8.2.6.2.
  8.2.6.1  Locate and correct  the source of
the problem and repeat the  test for all pa-
rameters of interest beginning with Section
8.2.2.
                                          80

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
  8.2.6.2  Beginning with Section 8.2.2, repeat
the  test  only for those  parameters  that
failed  to meet criteria.  Repeated failure,
however,  will  confirm a  general problem
with the measurement system. If this occurs,
locate  and correct the source of the problem
and repeat the test for all compounds of in-
terest beginning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The laboratory  must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike at least 10% of the samples from
each sample  site being monitored  to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing  one to
ten samples per month, at least  one  spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If,  as  in  compliance monitoring,
the concentration of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit, the spike  should
be at that limit or 1 to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the  concentration  of  a specific
parameter in  the  sample  is  not   being
checked  against a limit specific to that pa-
rameter, the  spike should be at 100 ng/L or 1
to 5 times higher than the background con-
centration  determined  in  Section  8.3.2,
whichever concentration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If it is impractical to  determine
background levels before spiking  (e.g., max-
imum  holding  times  will be exceeded),  the
spike concentration should be  (1) the regu-
latory  concentration  limit,  if  any,  or, if
none, (2) the  larger of either 5  times  higher
than the expected background concentration
or 100 ng/L.
  8.3.2  Analyze one sample aliquot to deter-
mine the background concentration  (B)  of
each parameter. If necessary, prepare a new
QC check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate  for the background  concentra-
tions in  the sample. Spike a second sample
aliquot with 1.0 mL of the QC check sample
concentrate and analyze it to determine the
concentration after spiking (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100(A-B)%/T, where T is the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with the corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found in  Table 3. These
acceptance criteria were calculated  to in-
clude an allowance for error in measurement
of both the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent  that  the analyst's spike  to   back-
ground ratio  approaches 5:1.8 If spiking was
performed at  a concentration lower than 100
HgVL, the analyst must use either the QC ac-
ceptance criteria in Table 3,  or optional QC
acceptance criteria calculated  for the spe-
cific spike concentration. To calculate  op-
tional acceptance criteria for the recovery of
a  parameter: (1)  Calculate  accuracy (X')
using the equation in Table 4, substituting
the spike concentration (T) for  C; (2) cal-
culate overall precision (S') using the equa-
tion in Table 4, substituting X' for X; (3) cal-
culate the range for recovery at the spike
concentration as (100 X'/T)±2.44(100 S7T)%.8
  8.3.4 If any individual P falls outside the
designated range for recovery, that param-
eter has  failed  the acceptance  criteria.  A
check standard  containing  each  parameter
that failed the criteria must be analyzed  as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the  acceptance
criteria for recovery  in Section 8.3,  a  QC
check standard  containing  each  parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the number of  parameters  being simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance of the labora-
tory.
  8.4.1 Prepare  the QC  check standard by
adding  1.0  mL  of  QC check sample con-
centrate (Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L  of rea-
gent  water. The QC check  standard  needs
only  to contain the parameters  that  failed
criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2 Analyze  the QC  check standard  to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each  parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (P,) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3 Compare the percent recovery (Ps)
for each parameter  with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 3. Only
parameters that  failed the test in Section 8.3
need  to be compared with these  criteria.  If
the recovery of any  such parameter falls out-
side the  designated range,  the  laboratory
performance for  that parameter is judged  to
be out of control, and the problem must be
immediately identified and  corrected. The
analytical result for that parameter  in the
unspiked sample is suspect and may  not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,  method accuracy  for wastewater
samples must be assessed and records must
be maintained.  After  the  analysis of five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate  the  average percent recovery (P)
and the standard deviation of the  percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy  assessment
as a percent recovery interval from P-2sp  to
P+2sp. If P=90% and sp=10%, for example, the
accuracy  interval  is expressed as 70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on  a regular  basis (e.g.  after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6.  It is  recommended that the labora-
tory  adopt  additional  quality   assurance
practices for use with this method. The spe-
cific practices that are most productive de-
pend  upon the needs of  the  laboratory and
the nature of the samples. Field  duplicates
                                          81

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 604
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
may be analyzed to assess the precision of
the  environmental  measurements.   When
doubt exists over the identification of a peak
on  the chromatogram,  confirmatory tech-
niques such as gas chromatography  with a
dissimilar column, specific element detector,
or mass  spectrometer must be  used  When-
ever possible, the laboratory should analyze
standard reference materials and participate
in relevant performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  Grab  samples  must  be collected  in
glass  containers.  Conventional  sampling
practices9  should  be followed,  except that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with sample
before  collection. Composite samples should
be collected in refrigerated glass containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program.  Automatic  sampling  equipment
must be  as free as  possible of Tygon tubing
and  other  potential  sources  of contamina-
tion.
  9.2  All samples  must  be iced  or refrig-
erated at 4 °C from  the  time of collection
until extraction. Fill the sample bottles and,
if residual  chlorine is present, add 80 mg of
sodium thiosulfate per liter  of sample and
mix  well. EPA Methods 330.4  and 330.5 may
be used  for measurement of  residual chlo-
rine.10  Field test kits are available  for this
purpose.
  9.3  All samples must be extracted within 7
days of collection and completely analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.2

            10. Sample Extraction

  10.1  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of sample bottle for  later determination of
sample volume. Pour the entire sample into
a 2-L separatory funnel.
  10.2  For samples high in organic content,
the analyst may solvent wash the sample at
basic pH as prescribed in Sections 10.2.1 and
10.2.2  to  remove  potential method  inter-
ferences. Prolonged  or  exhaustive  contact
with solvent during the wash may result in
low recovery of some  of the phenols, notably
phenol  and  2,4-dimethylphenol.  For rel-
atively clean  samples, the wash  should  be
omitted and the extraction, beginning with
Section 10.3, should be followed.
  10.2.1 Adjust the pH of the  sample to 12.0
or greater with sodium hydroxide solution.
  10.2.2 Add 60 mL of methylene chloride to
the sample by shaking the funnel for 1 min
with periodic venting to release excess pres-
sure.  Discard the solvent layer.  The wash
can be repeated up to two additional times if
significant color is being removed.
  10.3  Adjust the  sample to a pH of 1 to 2
with sulfuric acid.
  10.4  Add 60 mL of methylene chloride to
the sample bottle, seal,  and  shake 30 s  to
rinse the inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to the  separatory  funnel  and  extract  the
sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min. with
periodic venting to release excess pressure.
Allow the organic layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 min.  If the
emulsion  interface  between layers is  more
than one-third the volume of  the  solvent
layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation.
The  optimum technique depends  upon  the
sample, but may include stirring, filtration
of the emulsion through  glass wool, cen-
trifugation,  or other physical methods. Col-
lect the methylene chloride extract in  a 250-
mL Erlenmeyer flask.
  10.5  Add a second 60-mL volume of  meth-
ylene chloride to the sample bottle and re-
peat  the extraction procedure a second time,
combining the  extracts in the  Erlenmeyer
flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
manner.
  10.6  Assemble  a Kuderna-Danish  (K-D)
concentrator by attaching a 10-mL  concen-
trator  tube  to  a 500-mL evaporative  flask.
Other  concentration  devices or techniques
may  be used in  place  of  the K-D  concen-
trator if the requirements  of Section 8.2 are
met.
  10.7  Pour the combined extract through a
solvent-rinsed  drying  column  containing
about 10  cm of anhydrous sodium  sulfate,
and collect  the  extract in the  K-D  concen-
trator. Rinse the Erlenmeyer flask and col-
umn  with 20 to 30 mL of methylene chloride
to complete the quantitative transfer.
  10.8  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
the evaporative flask and attach a three-ball
Snyder column. Prewet the Snyder column
by adding about 1 mL of methylene chloride
to the top. Place the K-D apparatus on a hot
water bath (60 to 65 °C) so that the  concen-
trator tube is partially  immersed in the  hot
water,  and the  entire lower rounded surface
of the flask  is bathed with  hot vapor. Adjust
the vertical position  of the apparatus and
the water temperature  as  required to com-
plete the  concentration in 15 to 20 min. At
the proper rate of distillation the balls  of the
column will actively chatter but the cham-
bers  will  not flood with condensed solvent.
When the apparent volume of liquid reaches
1 mL, remove the K-D apparatus and allow it
to drain and cool for at least 10 min.
  10.9  Increase the temperature of  the  hot
water  bath to  95  to  100  °C.  Remove  the
Synder column and rinse  the flask and its
lower joint into the concentrator tube with 1
to 2 mL of 2-propanol. A 5-mL syringe is rec-
ommended for this operation. Attach a two-
ball  micro-Snyder  column to  the  concen-
trator tube and prewet the  column by adding
about 0.5 mL of 2-propanol to the top.  Place
the micro-K-D apparatus on the water bath
so that the concentrator  tube  is partially
immersed in  the  hot  water.  Adjust  the
vertical position of the apparatus and  the
water temperature  as required  to complete
                                          82

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
concentration in 5 to 10 min. At the proper
rate of distillation the balls  of the column
will actively chatter but the chambers will
not flood. When the apparent volume of liq-
uid reaches 2.5  mL, remove the K-D appa-
ratus and allow it to drain and cool for at
least 10 min. Add an additional 2 mL of 2-
propanol through the top of the micro-Sny-
der column and  resume concentrating as be-
fore.  When  the  apparent volume of liquid
reaches 0.5 mL, remove the K-D apparatus
and allow it to drain and cool for at least 10
min.
  10.10  Remove  the micro-Snyder  column
and rinse its lower joint  into  the  concen-
trator tube with a  minimum amount of 2-
propanol.  Adjust the extract volume to 1.0
mL. Stopper the concentrator tube and store
refrigerated at 4 °C if further processing will
not be performed immediately. If the extract
will be stored longer than two days, it should
be transferred to a  Teflon-sealed screw-cap
vial. If the sample extract requires no fur-
ther cleanup, proceed with FIDGC analysis
(Section 11).  If  the  sample requires further
cleanup, proceed to Section 12.
  10.11  Determine the  original  sample vol-
ume by refilling the sample bottle  to  the
mark and transferring1  the liquid to  a 1000-
mL graduated cylinder. Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5  mL.

       11. Flame lonization Detector Gas
             Chromatography

  11.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions   for  the  gas  chro-
matograph. Included in this table are reten-
tion times and  MDL that can  be achieved
under  these conditions. An example of  the
separations  achieved   by  this   column  is
shown in Figure 1. Other packed or capillary
(open-tubular)   columns,  chromatographic
conditions, or detectors may be used if the
requirements of Section 8.2 are met.
  11.2  Calibrate  the system daily as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  11.3  If the internal  standard  calibration
procedure  is  used,  the  internal standard
must be added  to  the  sample  extract and
mixed thoroughly immediately before injec-
tion into the gas chromatograph.
  11.4  Inject 2 to 5 |o.L of the sample extract
or  standard  into the  gas  chromatograph
using the solvent-flush  technique.11 Smaller
(1.0 |o.L) volumes may  be  injected if auto-
matic devices are employed. Record the vol-
ume injected to  the  nearest 0.05 \iL, and  the
resulting peak size  in  area or peak  height
units.
  11.5  Identify the parameters in the sample
by  comparing the  retention times  of  the
peaks  in  the sample  chromatogram with
those   of   the    peaks    in   standard
chromatograms.  The width of the retention
time  window used  to make identifications
should be based upon measurements of ac-
tual retention time  variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three  times the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound may be used to calculate a sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the analyst should weigh heavily in the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  11.6  If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range of the system, dilute the ex-
tract and reanalyze.
  11.7  If the measurement  of the peak re-
sponse is prevented by the presence of inter-
ferences, an alternative gas chromatographic
procedure is required. Section 12 describes a
derivatization and column chromatographic
procedure which has  been tested and found
to be a practical means of analyzing phenols
in complex extracts.

    12. Denvatization and Electron Capture
        Detector Gas Chromatography

  12.1  Pipet a  1.0-mL aliquot of the 2-pro-
panol solution of standard or sample extract
into a glass reaction vial.  Add 1.0  mL of
derivatizing  reagent  (Section 6.11).  This
amount of reagent is  sufficient to  derivatize
a solution whose total phenolic content does
not exceed 0.3 mg/mL.
  12.2  Add  about  3  mg of potassium  car-
bonate to the solution and shake gently.
  12.3  Cap the mixture and heat it for 4 h at
80 °C in a hot, water bath.
  12.4  Remove the solution  from the  hot
water bath and allow it to cool.
  12.5  Add 10 mL  of hexane to the reaction
flask and shake vigorously for 1 min. Add 3.0
mL of distilled, deionized water to the reac-
tion flask and shake for 2 miu. Decant a por-
tion of the organic layer into a concentrator
tube and cap with a glass stopper.
  12.6  Place 4.0  g   of  silica gel  into  a
chromatographic column. Tap the column to
settle the silica gel and add about 2 g of an-
hydrous sodium sulfate to the top.
  12.7  Preelute the  column with 6  mL of
hexane. Discard the eluate and just prior to
exposure of the sodium sulfate layer to the
air,  pipet onto the  column  2.0 mL  of the
hexane solution (Section 12.5) that contains
the derivatized sample or standard. Elute the
column with 10.0  mL of hexane and discard
the eluate. Elute the column, in order, with:
10.0 mL of 15% toluene in hexane (Fraction
1); 10.0 mL of 40% toluene in hexane (Frac-
tion 2); 10.0 mL of 75% toluene in hexane
(Fraction  3); and  10.0 mL of 15% 2-propanol
in toluene (Fraction 4). All elution mixtures
are prepared on  a volume:  volume basis.
Elution patterns for the phenolic derivatives
are shown in Table 2. Fractions may be com-
bined as desired, depending upon the specific
phenols of interest or level of interferences.
  12.8  Analyze the   fractions by ECDGC.
Table 2 summarizes the recommended oper-
ating conditions for the  gas chromatograph.
Included in this table  are retention times
and MDL  that can be achieved under these
conditions.  An example of  the separations
                                          83

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 604
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
achieved by this column is shown in Figure
2.
  12.9  Calibrate the  system  daily  with a
minimum of three aliquots of calibration
standards, containing- each of the phenols of
interest  that  are  derivatized according  to
Section 7.5.
  12.10  Inject 2 to 5 jiL of the column frac-
tions into the gas chromatograph using the
solvent-flush technique. Smaller (1.0 nD vol-
umes can be injected if automatic  devices
are employed. Record the volume injected to
the nearest  0.05 |iL,  and the resulting peak
size in area or peak height units. If the peak
response exceeds the linear range of the sys-
tem, dilute the  extract and reanalyze.

              13. Calculations

  13.1  Determine the concentration  of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample  analyzed by
FIDGC (without derivatization)  as indicated
below.
  13.1.1  If the  external standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the amount  of
material injected  from the peak response
using the calibration curve or calibration
factor determined  in  Section 7.2.2. The con-
centration in the sample  can be calculated
from Equation 2.
 Concentration (^g/L) =
     Concentration (Hg/L) =
                            (v,Xv§)
                                Equation 2
where:
A=Amount of material injected (ng).
V,=Volume of extract injected (nL).
V,=Volume of total extract (nL).
Vs=Volume of water extracted (mL),
  13.1.2  If the internal  standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the  concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined in  Section 7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.
 Concentration (|ig/L) =
                         (Ais)(RF)(V0)
                                Equation 3

where:
As=Response  for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
Als=Response for the internal standard.
Is=Amount of  internal  standard added  to
  each extract (ng).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2 Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample analyzed by
derivatization  and  ECDGC  according  to
Equation 4.
                         ,   .     ,
                         (V.)(VS)(C)(E)
                               Equation 4

where:
A=Mass of underivatized phenol represented
  by area of peak in sample chromatogram,
  determined from calibration curve in  Sec-
  tion 7.5.3 (ng).
V,=Volume of eluate injected (nL).
V,=Total volume of column eluate or com-
  bined fractions from which  V, was taken
  (pi.).
Vs=Volume of water  extracted in Section
  10.10 (mL).
B=Total  volume of hexane added in Section
  12.5 (mL).
C=Volume of hexane sample solution added
  to cleanup column in Section 12.7 (mL).
D=Total  volume of 2-propanol extract prior
  to derivatization (mL).
E=Volume  of  2-propanol extract  carried
  through  derivatization  in  Section  12.1
  (mL).
  13.3  Report results in (ig/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC  data obtained
should be reported with the sample  results.

          14. Method Performance

  14.1  The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration  of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.1 The MDL  concentrations listed in- Ta-
bles 1 and 2 were obtained using reagent
water.12 Similar results were achieved using
representative wastewaters. The MDL actu-
ally achieved in a given analysis  will vary
depending on instrument  sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2  This method was  tested by  20 labora-
tories using reagent water, drinking  water,
surface   water,   and    three   industrial
wastewaters  spiked as  six concentrations
over the range  12 to 450  ng/L.13 Single oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter  and es-
sentially independent of  the sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships  for a flame ionization detector are pre-
sented in Table 4.

                References

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. "Determination of Phenols in Industrial
and Municipal  Wastewaters,"  EPA 600/4-84-
ABC,  National Technical Information Serv-
ice, PBXYZ, Springfield, Virginia  22161, No-
vember 1984.
  3. Kawahara, F. K. "Microdetermination of
Derivatives  of  Phenols  and Mercaptans by
                                          84

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                            Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
                                                11. Burke,  J. A. "Gas Chromatography for
                                              Pesticide Residue Analysis; Some Practical
                                              Aspects," Journal of the Association of Official
                                              Analytical Chemists, 48, 1037 (1965).
                                                12. "Development of Detection Limits, EPA
                                              Method 604,  Phenols,"  Special letter report
                                              for EPA  Contract 68-03-2625,  U.S.  Environ-
                                              mental Protection  Agency,  Environmental
                                              Monitoring  and Support Laboratory,  Cin-
                                              cinnati, Ohio 45268.
                                                13. "EPA Method Study 14 Method 604-Phe-
                                              nols,"  EPA 600/4-84-044, National Technical
                                              Information  Service,  PB84-196211,  Spring-
                                              field, Virginia 22161, May 1984.

                                               TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND
                                                        METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Means  of Electron  Capture  Gas  Chroma-
tography,"  Analytical  Chemistry,  40,   1009
(1968).
  4. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constituents," American So-
ciety for Testing  and Materials, Philadel-
phia.
  5.  "Carcinogens—Working  With  Carcino-
gens," Department  of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  6.  "OSHA  Safety and  Health Standards,
General Industry,"  (29 CFR part 1910), Occu-
pational Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  7. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion,  Committee  on Chemical Safety, 3rd
Edition, 1979.
  8. Provost, L. P., and Elder, R. S. "Inter-
pretation of Percent Recovery Data," Amer-
ican Laboratory,  15, 58-63  (1983). (The value
2.44 used  in the equation in  Section 8.3.3 is
two  times the value 1.22 derived in this re-
port.)
  9. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31,  D3370-76. "Standard Practices for Sam-
pling Water," American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  10. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetric, DPD-FAS)
and  330.5 (Spectrophotometric, DPD) for
Chlorine,   Total  Residual,"  Methmds  for
Chemical  Analysis of Water and  Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020, U.S.  Environmental  Pro-
tection Agency,  Environmental Monitoring
and  Support  Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  Ohio
45268, March 1979.

 TABLE  2—SILICA GEL FRACTIONATION AND ELECTRON CAPTURE GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY OF PFBB
                                       DERIVATIVES
Parameter
2-Chtorophenol 	

Phenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol 	
2,4-Dichlorophenol 	
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 	
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2,4-Dimtrophenol .
2-Methyl-4,6-dmitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Retention
time (mm)
1 70
200
301
4.03
430
605
750
1000
10.24
1242
24.25
Method de-
tection limit
(H9/L)
031
045
014
032
0.39
064
036
130
160
74
28
                                                Column conditions  Supelcoport (80/100 mesh) coated with
                                              1% SP-1240DA packed in a 1.8 m long x 2 mm ID glass col-
                                              umn with nitrogen earner gas at 30 mL/min flow rate  Column
                                              temperature was 80 °C at injection, programmed immediately
                                              at 8 °C/min to 150 °C final temperature MDL were deter-
                                              mined wtth an  FID
Parent compound
2-Chlorophenol . ..... . .
2-Nitrophenol .... . . 	
Phenol 	 ... 	
2,4-Dichlorophenol 	

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 	
Pentachlorophenol 	 	 . 	
4-Nitrophenol . 	 	
Percent recovery by frac-
tion8
1
50
75
2
90
90
95
95
50
84
20
3
1
9
10
7
1
14
1
4
90
90
Retention
time (min)
3.3
91
1 8
2.9
58
7.0
4.8
288
140
Method
detection
limit ((ig/L)
058
0.77
22
0.63
068
058
1 8
059
070
 Column conditions Chromosorb W-AW-DMCS (80/100 mesh) coated with 5% OV-17 packed in a 1 8 m long x 2 0 mm ID
glass column with 5% methane/95% argon carrier gas at 30 mL/mm flow rate Column temperature held isothermal at 200 °C
MDL were determined with an ECD
 • Eluant composition-
     Fraction 1—15% toluene in hexane.
     Fraction 2—40% toluene in hexane
     Fraction 3—75% toluene in hexane
     Fraction 4—15% 2-propanol in toluene
                                           85

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
                         TABLE 3—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 604
Parameter
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol 	
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dmitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dmitrophenol 	
2-Nitrophenol ...
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol . ...
Phenol . . ...
2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol . . . .
Test
cone
(H9/L)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Limit for s

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                          Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 604
    9   »=
    0_. s
     evj
      LU
     U
            COLUMN:  1% SP-1240DA ON SUPELCOPORT

            PROGRAM: 80°C AT INJECTION, IMMEDIATE 8eC/MIN TO 150°C

            DETECTOR: FLAME IONIZATION
                   O
             1    I


             hi
             UJ  UJ *°
         CM'O
           _ «?  Q -J

           52  £|
           5 3  ztn
           ^7 I  5S
           (0 O  «• *^
         v,
                      o
                      g
                      ee
                      O


                      5
                      <
0      4      8      12     16     20    24


                  RETENTION TIME, MIN.



 Figure 1. Gas chromatogram of phenols.
                                               28
                              87
    203-160  D-4

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 605
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                           COLUMN: 5% OV-17 ON CHROMQSORB W-AW-OMCS
                           TEMPERATURE:  200'C.
                           DETECTOR:  ELECTRON  CAPTURE
                                                               LU
                                                               a.
                                                               §
                                                               O
                                                               <
   0       4       8       12      16      20      24      28      32
                         RETENTION TIME, MIN.

  Figure 2.  Gas chromatogram of PFB derivatives of phenols.
         METHOD 605—BENZIDINES

         1. Scope and Application
  1.1 This method covers the determination
of certain benzidines. The following param-
eters can be determined by this method:
Parameter
Benzidine .... 	
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidme . . ..
Storet No
39120
34631
CAS No.
92-87-5
91-94-1
  1.2 This is a high performance liquid chro-
matography (HPLC)  method applicable to
the determination of the compounds listed
above in municipal and industrial discharges
as provided under 40 CFR 136.1. When this
method is  used to analyze unfamiliar sam-
ples for the compounds above, identifications
should be  supported by at least one addi-
tional qualitative technique. This method
describes  electrochemical  conditions  at  a
second potential which can be used to con-
firm measurements made with this method.
Method 625 provides gas chromatograph/mass
spectrometer  (GC/MS)  conditions   appro-
priate for  the qualitative  and quantitative
confirmation of results for the  parameters
listed above, using the extract produced by
this method.
  1.3 The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined in Section 14.1)' for each parameter is
                                      88

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 605
listed  in  Table 1.  The MDL for a specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending upon the nature of the interferences
in the  sample matrix.
  1.4  Any modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as a major modification- subject to
application and approval  of alternate test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.5  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the  supervision of analysts experi-
enced  in  the use  of HPLC instrumentation
and   in   the   interpretation   of  liquid
chromatograms.  Each  analyst  must dem-
onstrate the ability to generate acceptable
results with this method using the procedure
described in Section 8.2.

            2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A measured volume  of sample,  ap-
proximately 1-L,  is extracted with chloro-
form  using  liquid-liquid  extractions in  a
separatory funnel. The chloroform extract is
extracted with  acid. The acid extract is then
neutralized and extracted with chloroform.
The final  chloroform extract is exchanged to
methanol while being concentrated using a
rotary evaporator. The extract is mixed with
buffer  and separated by HPLC, The benzidine
compounds  are measured with  an  electro-
chemical detector.2
  2.2  The acid back-extraction  acts as  a
general purpose cleanup to aid in the elimi-
nation of interferences.

               3. Interferences

  3.1  Method interferences may  be caused
by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that lead  to discrete artifacts  and/or ele-
vated  baselines in chromatograms.  All  of
these  materials  must be routinely  dem-
onstrated to be free from interferences under
the conditions  of the analysis by running
laboratory  reagent blanks as described  in
Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1   Glassware   must   be  scrupulously
cleaned.3  Clean all glassware as soon  as
possible after use by rinsing with the last
solvent used in it. Solvent rinsing should be
followed  by detergent washing  with hot
water,   and  rinses  with  tap   water  and
distilled water.  The glassware should then be
drained dry, and heated in a muffle furnace
at 400  °C  for 15 to 30 min. Some thermally
stable  materials may not  be eliminated by
this treatment. Solvent rinses with acetone
and pesticide quality  hexane may be substi-
tuted for  the muffle  furnace heating.  Vol-
umetric ware should not be heated in a muf-
fle furnace. After drying and cooling, glass-
ware should be sealed and stored in a clean
environment to prevent any accumulation of
dust or other contaminants. Store inverted
or capped  with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2  The use of high purity reagents and
solvents helps to minimize interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required,
  3.2  Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are co-extracted from the
sample. The extent of matrix interferences
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending upon the nature and diversity of
the industrial complex or  municipality being
sampled. The cleanup procedures that are in-
herent  in the extraction step  are  used to
overcome many of these interferences, but
unique  samples  may  require  additional
cleanup approaches to achieve the MDL list-
ed in Table 1.
  3.3  Some dye plant effluents contain large
amounts of components with retention times
closed to benzidine. In these cases, it has
been found useful to reduce the electrode po-
tential  in  order to eliminate interferences
and still detect benzidine. (See Section 12.7.)

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity or  carcinogenicity  of
each reagent  used in  this method has  not
been precisely defined; however, each  chem-
ical compound should  be  treated as a poten-
tial health harzard. Prom this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals  must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The laboratory is responsible for
maintaining  a  current  awareness  file  of
OSHA  regulations  regarding the  safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this  meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be  made available  to all
personnel involved in the  chemical analysis.
Additional references  to  laboratory safety
are available and have been identified  -1-* for
the information of the  analyst.
  4.2  The following parameters covered by
this method have been tentatively classified
as known or suspected, human or mamma-
lian  carcinogens:   benzidine   and   3,3'-
dichlorobenzidine.  Primary  standards  of
these toxic compounds should be prepared in
a hood. A NIOSH/MBSA approved toxic gas
respirator should be worn when the  analyst
handles high  concentrations  of these toxic
compounds.
  4.3  Exposure  to  chloroform  should  be
minimized by performing  all  extractions and
extract  concentrations in a hood or  other
well-ventiliated area.

         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling  equipment,  for discrete  or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1  Grab   sample  bottle—1-L  or   1-qt,
amber  glass, fitted with  a screw cap lined
with Teflon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If amber
bottles  are  not available, protect samples
from light. The bottle  and cap liner must be
washed, rinsed with acetone or methylene
                                          89

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 605
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
chloride, and dried before use to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2 Automatic  sampler  (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample con-
tainers for the collection of a minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4°C and protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic  pump, a  minimum length of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may be
used.  Before  use, however, the compressible
tubing should be  thoroughly  rinsed with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize the potential for
contamination of the sample. An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All specifications are sug-
gested):
  5.2.1 Separatory funnels—2000, 1000, and
250-mL, with Teflon stopcock.
  5.2.2 Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.2.3 Rotary evaporator.
  5.2.4 Flasks—Round bottom, 100-mL, with
24/40 joints.
  5.2.5 Centrifuge   tubes—Conical,   grad-
uated, with Teflon-lined screw caps.
  5.2.6 Pipettes—Pasteur, with bulbs.
  5.3  Balance—Analytical, capable of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.4  High    performance    liquid   chro-
matograph  (HPLC)—An analytical system
complete with column supplies, high pres-
sure syringes, detector, and compatible re-
corder. A data system is recommended for
measuring peak areas and retention times.
  5.4.1 Solvent delivery system—With pulse
damper, Altex 110A or equivalent.
  5.4.2 Injection   valve  (optional)—Waters
U6K or equivalent.
  5.4.3 Electrochemical         detector—
Bioanalytical Systems LC-2A  with glassy
carbon electrode, or equivalent.  This detec-
tor has proven effective in  the  analysis of
wastewaters for the parameters listed in the
scope (Section 1.1), and was used to develop
the method performance statements in Sec-
tion 14. Guidelines for the use of alternate
detectors are provided in Section 12.1.
  5.4.4 Electrode  polishing  kit—Princeton
Applied Research Model 9320 or equivalent.
  5.4.5 Column—Lichrosorb RP-2, 5 micron
particle diameter, in a 25 cm x 4.6 mm ID
stainless steel column. This column was used
to develop the method performance state-
ments in Section 14. Guidelines for the use of
alternate column  packings are provided in
Section 12.1.

                6. Reagents

  6.1  Reagent water—Reagent water is de-
fined  as a  water  in  which an interferent is
not observed at the  MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Sodium hydroxide solution (5 N)—Dis-
solve 20 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 100 mL.
  6.3  Sodium hydroxide solution (1 M)—Dis-
solve 40 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 1 L.
  6.4  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.5  Sodium tribasic  phosphate (0.4 M)—
Dissolve 160 g of trisodium phosphate deca-
hydrate (ACS) in reagent water and dilute to
1L.
  6.6  Sulfuric acid (1+1>—Slowly, add 50 mL
of H2SO4 (ACS, sp. gr. 1.84) to 50 mL of rea-
gent water.
  6.7  Sulfuric acid (1 M)—Slowly, add 58 mL
of H2SO4 (ACS, sp. gr. 1.84) to reagent water
and dilute to 1 L.
  6.8  Acetate buffer (0.1 M, pH 4.7)—Dissolve
5.8 mL of glacial acetic acid (ACS) and 13.6 g
of sodium acetate trihydrate (ACS) in rea-
gent water which has been purified by filtra-
tion through a RO-4 Millipore  System or
equivalent and dilute to 1 L.
  6.9  Acetonitrile,  chloroform  (preserved
with 1% ethanol),  methanol—Pesticide qual-
ity or equivalent.
  6.10  Mobile phase—Place equal volumes of
filtered acetonitrile (Millipore type FH filter
or equivalent)  and  filtered acetate buffer
(Millipore type GS filter or equivalent) in a
narrow-mouth, glass container and mix thor-
oughly. Prepare fresh weekly. Degas daily by
sonicating under vacuum, by heating an stir-
ring, or by purging with helium.
  6.11  Stock  standard solutions  (1.00  |ig/
liL)—Stock standard  solutions may be pre-
pared from pure standard materials or pur-
chased as certified solutions.
  6.11.1  Prepare stock standard solutions by
accurately  weighing  about  0.0100 g of  pure
material. Dissolve the material  in methanol
and dilute to volume in a 10-mL volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity is  assayed to be  96% or greater,  the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate the concentration of the stock stand-
ard.  Commercially prepared stock standards
can be used  at any concentration if they are
certified by  the manufacturer or by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.11.2  Transfer  the  stock standard solu-
tions into  Teflon-sealed  screw-cap  bottles.
Store at 4 °C and  protect from light. Stock
standard solutions should be  checked  fre-
quently for  signs  of  degradation or evapo-
ration,  especially just prior to  preparing
calibration standards from them.
  6.11.3  Stock  standard solutions  must be
replaced after six months, or sooner if com-
parison with  check  standards  indicates  a
problem.
  6.12  Quality  control check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.
                                          90

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 605
               7. Calibration

  7.1  Establish chromatographic operating
conditions equivalent to those given in Table
1. The HPLC system can be calibrated using
the external standard technique (Section 7.2)
or the internal standard technique (Section
7.3).
  7.2  External standard  calibration proce-
dure:
  7.2.1 Prepare calibration standards  at  a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each  parameter of interest by adding vol-
umes of  one or more stock standards to  a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
mobile phase. One of the external standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the MDL (Table 1) and the other concentra-
tions should  correspond  to  the  expected
range of concentrations found in real  sam-
ples or should define  the working range of
the detector.
  7.2.2 Using syringe injections of 5 to 25 nL
or a constant volume injection loop, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against the mass  injected. The re-
sults can be used to  prepare  a calibration
curve for each compound. Alternatively, if
the  ratio of response  to  amount injected
(calibration factor) is a constant  over the
working range  (<10%  relative  standard  devi-
ation, BSD), linearity through the origin can
be assumed and the average ratio or calibra-
tion factor can be used in place of a calibra-
tion curve.
  7.3  Internal  standard calibration  proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select one or  more internal standards that
are similar in analytical behavior to  the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate that the  measurement of
the  internal  standard is  not  affected by
method or matrix interferences. Because of
these limitations,  no internal standard can
be suggested that is  applicable to all  sam-
ples.
  7.3.1 Prepare calibration standards  at  a
minimum of three  concentration levels for
each  parameter of interest by adding vol-
umes of  one or more stock standards to  a
volumetric flask. To each calibration stand-
ard, add a known constant amount  of one or
more internal standards, and dilute to vol-
ume with mobile phase. One of the standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the  MDL  and the   other  concentrations
should correspond to the expected range of
concentrations found in  real  samples  or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
  7.3.2 Using syringe injections of 5 to 25 jiL
or a constant volume injection loop, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against concentration for each com-
pound and internal  standard.  Calculate re-
sponse factors (RP) for each compound using
Equation 1.

         RF=   (AS)(C,S)   (A,,)(CS)
                                Equation 1
where:
A,=Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
Als=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration  of  the internal  standard
  (ug/L).
Cs=Concentration  of  the parameter to  be
  measured (ng/L).
  If the RF value  over the working range is
a constant (<10%  RSD), the RF can be as-
sumed to be invariant  and the average RF
can be used for calculations.  Alternatively,
the results can be used  to plot a calibration
curve of response ratios, Ay A,,, vs. RF.
  7.4  The  working calibration curve,  cali-
bration factor, or  RF must be  verified  on
each working day by the measurement of one
or more calibration  standards. If  the re-
sponse for any parameter  varies from the
predicted response by more than ±15%, a new
calibration curve must  be prepared for that
compound. If serious loss of response occurs,
polish the electrode and recalibrate.
  7.5  Before using any cleanup procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date  elution patterns  and the  absence  of
interferences from the reagents.

             8. Quality Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of spiked  samples  to  evaluate and
document data quality. The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks  are  compared with  established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes indicate atypical method  perform-
ance,  a quality control check standard must
be analyzed  to confirm that  the measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1 The analyst must  make an initial,
one-time, demonstration  of the ability  to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method.  This ability  is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2 In recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options  (detailed in  Sec-
tions  10.9, 11.1, and 12.1) to improve the sepa-
rations  or  lower the  cost of measurements.
Each  time such a  modification  is made to
                                          91

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 605
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
the method, the analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3  Before  processing any  samples,  the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate that interferences from  the
analytical  system and  glassware are under
control. Each time a set of samples is  ex-
tracted or  reagents are changed,  a  reagent
water  blank must  be processed  as  a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4  The laboratory must, on an  ongoing
basis, spike and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples to monitor and  evaluate lab-
oratory data quality. This procedure is  de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5  The laboratory must, on an  ongoing
basis, demonstrate  through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is  described in  Section
8.4. The frequency of  the  check standard
analyses is equivalent to 10% of all  samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from  samples (Section  8.3) meet  all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6  The laboratory  must maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To establish  the ability to generate
acceptable  accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required  containing benzidine
and/or 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine at a concentra-
tion of 50 ng/mL each in methanol.  The QC
check sample concentrate must be obtained
from  the  U.S. Environmental  Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port Laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio,  if avail-
able. If not available from that source,  the
QC check sample concentrate  must be  ob-
tained from another external source. If  not
available from  either source above,  the  QC
check sample concentrate must be prepared
by the laboratory using stock standards pre-
pared independently from those used  for cali-
bration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet,  prepare QC check sam-
ples at a concentration of 50 ug/L by adding
1.00 mL of QC  check  sample concentrate to
each of four 1-L-L aliquots of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze the  well-mixed  QC check
samples according to  the method beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the average recovery (X) in
Hg/L, and the standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in ng/L, for each parameter using
the four results.
  8.2.5  For each parameter compare  s and X
with the corresponding acceptance  criteria
for precision  and  accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table  2. If s and X for  all param-
eters  of  interest meet  the acceptance  cri-
teria, the system performance  is acceptable
and analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any individual  s exceeds the precision limit
or any individual X falls outside  the range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for  that parameter.  Locate  and
correct the source of the problem and repeat
the test for all  parameters of interest begin-
ning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The  laboratory must,  on  an ongoing
basis, spike at least 10% of the samples from
each sample site being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing  one to
ten samples per month, at least one  spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If, as in  compliance  monitoring,
the concentration of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit, the spike  should
be at that limit or  1 to 5 times  higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the concentration of  a specific
parameter in  the  sample  is   not  being
checked against a limit specific to that pa-
rameter,  the spike  should be at  50 ng/L or 1
to 5  times higher than the background con-
centration  determined  in  Section  8.3.2,
whichever concentration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If it is impractical to determine
background levels before spiking (e.g., max-
imum holding  times will be exceeded),  the
spike concentration should be (1) the regu-
latory concentration limit, if any; or, if none
(2) the larger of either 5 times  higher than
the expected background concentration or 50
  8.3.2  Analyze one sample aliquot to deter-
mine  the background concentration (B) of
each parameter. If necessary, prepare a new
QC check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate for  the  background concentra-
tions in the sample. Spike a second sample
aliquot with 1.0 mL of the QC check sample
concentrate and analyze it to determine the
concentration after spiking (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100(A-B)%/T,  where T is  the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter  with the corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 2. These
acceptance criteria were calculated to in-
clude an allowance for error in measurement
of both the background  and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent that  the analyst's  spike to back-
ground ratio approaches 5:1. 7 If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than 50
|ig/L, the analyst must use either the QC ac-
ceptance criteria in Table 2, or optional QC
acceptance criteria calculated  for the spe-
cific spike concentration. To  calculate op-
tional acceptance criteria for the recovery of
a parameter:  (1) Calculate accuracy  (X')
using the equation in Table 3, substituting
                                          92

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 605
the spike  concentration  (T)  for C; (2)  cal-
culate overall precision (S') using the equa-
tion in Table 3, substituting X' for X; (3) cal-
culate the range for recovery at the spike
concentration as (100 X7T)±2.44(100 S'/T)%.7
  8.3.4 If any individual  P falls  outside the
designated range for recovery, that param-
eter has  failed  the acceptance  criteria  A
check standard  containing each parameter
that failed the criteria must  be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
criteria for recovery  in  Section 8.3, a QC
check standard  containing each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the number of  parameters  being simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance of  the labora-
tory.
  8.4.1 Prepare  the QC  check standard by
adding  1.0  mL  of   QC check sample con-
centrate (Sections 6.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L of rea-
gent  water. The QC check  standard needs
only to contain the parameters  that failed
criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2 Analyze  the QC check standard to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each  percent re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3 Compare the percent recovery  (Ps)
for each parameter  with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 2. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared with these criteria.  If
the recovery of any  such parameter falls out-
side the designated range,  the  laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control, and the problem  must be
immediately identified and  corrected.  The
analytical  result for that parameter in the
unspiked sample is suspect and may not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the  lab-
oratory,  method accuracy for wastewater
samples must be assessed and records must
be  maintained.  After the analysis of  five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate  the  average percent recovery (P)
and the standard deviation of  the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent recovery interval from P - 2sp to
P+2Sp. If P=90% and sp=10%, for example, the
accuracy  interval is expressed as  70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on a  regular  basis (e.g. after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6  It is recommended that  the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this method. The specific prac-
tices that are most  productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field  duplicates may  be ana-
lyzed to assess the precision of the environ-
mental  measurements. When doubt  exists
over the identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
HPLC with a dissimilar column, gas chroma-
tography, or mass  spectrometer  must  be
used.  Whenever possible,  the  laboratory
should analyze standard reference materials
and  participate in  relevant  performance
evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling
  9.1  Grab  samples  must  be  collected  in
glass  containers.  Conventional   sampling
practices8 should be followed, except that the
bottle must not be prerinsed with sample be-
fore  collection. Composite samples should be
collected in refrigerated glass containers in
accordance with the requirements of the pro-
gram. Automatic sampling equipment must
be as free as possible of  Tygon tubing and
other potential sources of contamination.
  9.2  All  samples must be iced  or  refrig-
erated at 4°C and stored in the dark from the
time  of collection  until  extraction. Both
benzidine  and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine are eas-
ily oxidized. Pill the sample bottles  and, if
residual chlorine is present, add 80 mg of so-
dium thiosulfate per liter of sample and mix
well.  EPA Methods  330.4  and  330.5 may  be
used for measurement of  residual chlorine.9
Field test kits are available for this purpose.
After mixing, adjust the pH of the sample to
a range of 2 to 7 with sulfuric acid.
  9.3  If 1,2-diphenylhydrazine is likely to be
present, adjust the pH of the sample  to 4.0+
0.2 to prevent rearrangement to benzidine.
  9.4  All samples must be extracted within 7
days of collection. Extracts may be held  up
to 7  days before analysis, if stored under  an
inert (oxidant free) atmosphere.2 The extract
should be protected from light.

            10. Sample Extraction
  10.1  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the sample bottle for later determination
of sample volume.  Pour the  entire sample
into  a 2-L separatory funnel. Check the pH
of the sample with wide-range pH  paper and
adjust to within the range of 6.5 to 7.5 with
sodium hydroxide solution or sulfuric acid.
  10.2  Add 100 mL of chloroform to the sam-
ple bottle, seal, and shake 30 s to rinse the
inner surface.  (Caution: Handle chloroform
in a  well ventilated  area.) Transfer the sol-
vent to the  separatory funnel and extract
the sample by shaking- the funnel for 2 min
with periodic venting to release excess pres-
sure.  Allow  the organic  layer to  separate
from the water phase for a minimum of 10
min. If the  emulsion interface between lay-
ers is more than one-third the volume of the
solvent layer, the analyst must employ me-
chanical techniques  to complete the phase
separation. The optimum  technique depends
upon  the sample, but may  include stirring,
filtration  of  the  emulsion through  glass
                                          93

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 605
           40 CFR Ch.  I (7-1-04 Edition)
wool, centrifugation, or other physical meth-
ods.  Collect the chloroform extract in a 250-
mL separatory funnel.
  10.3  Add a 50-mL volume of chloroform to
the sample bottle and repeat the extraction
procedure a second time, combining the ex-
tracts in  the separatory funnel. Perform a
third extraction in the same manner.
  10.4  Separate  and  discard any aqueous
layer remaining in  the 250-mL separatory
funnel after combining the organic extracts.
Add  25 mL of 1 M sulfuric acid and extract
the sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min.
Transfer the aqueous layer to a 250-mL beak-
er. Extract with two additional 25-mL por-
tions of 1 M sulfuric acid and combine the
acid extracts in the beaker.
  10.5  Place a stirbar in the 250-mL  beaker
and stir the acid extract while carefully add-
ing 5 mL of 0.4 M sodium tribasic phosphate.
While monitoring with a  pH  meter,  neu-
tralize the extract to a pH between 6 and 7  by
dropwise addition of 5 N sodium hydroxide
solution  while stirring  the solution vigor-
ously. Approximately 25 to 30 mL of 5 N so-
dium hydroxide solution will be required and
it should be added over at least a 2-min pe-
riod. Do not allow the sample pH to exceed 8.
  10.6  Transfer the neutralized  extract into
a 250-mL  separatory funnel. Add 30  mL  of
chloroform and shake the funnel for 2 min.
Allow the phases to  separate, and transfer
the organic layer to  a second 250-mL sepa-
ratory funnel.
  10.7  Extract the aqueous layer with two
additional 20-mL aliquots of  chloroform  as
before. Combine the extracts  in the 250-mL
separatory funnel.
  10.8  Add 20 mL of  reagent water  to the
combined organic layers and shake for 30 s.
  10.9  Transfer the  organic extract  into a
100-mL round bottom flask. Add 20  mL  of
methanol and concentrate to 5 mL with a ro-
tary evaporator at reduced pressure  and  35
°C. An aspirator is recommended for use  as
the source of vacuum. Chill the receiver with
ice. This operation requires approximately 10
min. Other concentration techniques may  be
used if the requirements of Section  8.2 are
met.
  10.10 Using a 9-in. Pasteur pipette, trans-
fer the extract to a 15-mL, conical, screw-cap
centrifuge tube. Rinse the flask, including
the entire side wall,  with 2-mL  portions  of
methanol and combine with the original ex-
tract.
  10.11 Carefully concentrate the extract  to
0.5 mL using a gentle  stream  of nitrogen
while heating in a 30 °C water bath. Dilute to
2 mL with methanol, reconcentrate to 1 mL,
and dilute to 5 mL with acetate buffer. Mix
the extract thoroughly. Cap the centrifuge
tube  and store refrigerated and protected
from light if further processing will  not  be
performed immediately. If the  extract will
be stored longer than two days,  it should  be
transferred to a Teflon-sealed screw-cap vial.
If the sample  extract  requires  no further
cleanup,  proceed with HPLC analysis (Sec-
tion 12). If the sample requires further clean-
up, proceed to Section 11.
  10.12 Determine the original sample vol-
ume by  refilling the sample  bottle to  the
mark and transferring the liquid to a 1,000-
mL graduated  cylinder.  Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5 mL.

         11. Cleanup and Separation

  11.1  Cleanup procedures may not be nec-
essary for a relatively clean sample matrix.
If particular circumstances demand the use
of a  cleanup procedure, the  analyst  first
must  demonstrate that the requirements of
Section 8.2 can be met using the method as
revised to incorporate the cleanup proce-
dure.

 12. High Performance Liquid Chromatography

  12.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating conditions for  the HPLC. Included
in this table are retention times,  capacity
factors, and MDL that can be achieved under
these conditions. An example  of the separa-
tions   achieved  by  this  HPLC  column is
shown in Figure 1. Other HPLC  columns,
chromatographic conditions,   or  detectors
may be used if the requirements of Section
8.2 are met. When the HPLC is idle, it is ad-
visable to  maintain  a  0.1  mL/min  flow
through the column to prolong column life.
  12.2  Calibrate  the system   daily as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12.3  If the internal standard  calibration
procedure is being used, the internal stand-
ard must be added to the sample extract and
mixed thoroughly immediately before injec-
tion into the instrument.
  12.4  Inject 5 to 25 uL of the sample extract
or standard into  the HPLC. If  constant vol-
ume injection loops  are not used, record the
volume injected to  the nearest 0.05 uL,  and
the resulting peak size in area  or  peak
height units.
  12.5  Identify the parameters  in the sample
by  comparing  the  retention  times of  the
peaks  in the  sample chromatogram  with
those    of   the   peaks   in    standard
chromatograms. The width of  the retention
time  window used  to make identifications
should be based  upon measurements of ac-
tual retention  time variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three times the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound can  be used to calculate a sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the analyst  should weigh heavily in the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  12.6  If the response for a peak exceeds the
working  range  of the system, dilute the ex-
tract with mobile phase and reanalyze.
  12.7  If the measurement of the  peak re-
sponse for benzidine is prevented by the pres-
ence of interferences, reduce  the electrode
                                          94

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              Pt. 136, App. A.Meth. 605
potential to +0.6 V and reanalyze. If the ben-
zidine peak Is still obscured by Interferences,
further cleanup Is required.

              13. Calculations

  13.1  Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  13.1.1  If the external standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the amount of
material injected from  the peak  response
using  the  calibration curve  or  calibration
factor determined in Section 7.2.2.  The con-
centration in the sample can be calculated
from Equation 2.
     Concentration (|J,g/L) =
(A)(Vt)
(vj(vs)
                                Equation 2
where:
A=Amount of material injected (ng).
V,=Volume of extract injected (uL).
V,=Volume of total extract (uL).
Vs=Volume of water extracted (mL).
  13.1.2  If the internal standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined in  Section 7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.
  Concentration (|J.g/L) =
                          (Ais)(RF)(V0)
                                Equation 3

where:
As=Response for the parameter to  be meas-
  ured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
Is=Amount  of  internal  standard added  to
  each extract (ng:).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2 Report results in ug/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          14. Method Performance
  14.1 The method detection limit  (MDL) is
defined  as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.1 The  MDL  concentrations listed  in
Table 1  were obtained using reagent water.10
Similar  results were achieved  using  rep-
resentative  wastewaters. The MDL actually
achieved in a given  analysis will  vary de-
pending on  instrument sensitivity  and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2 This  method has been tested for lin-
earity of spike recovery  from reagent water
and has been demonstrated to be applicable
over the concentration range from 7xMDL to
SOOOxMDL.10
  14.3  This method was tested by 17 labora-
tories  using reagent water, drinking water,
surface   water,    and   three   industrial
wastewaters spiked at six concentrations
over the range 1.0  to 70 ng/L.11 Single oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to  be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter and es-
sentially independent of the sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 3.

                References

  1. 40 CPR part 136, appendix B.
  2. "Determination of  Benzidines in Indus-
trial and Muncipal Wastewaters," EPA 600/4-
82-022, National Technical Information Serv-
ice, PB82-196320, Springfield, Virginia 22161,
April 1982.
  3. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constituents," American So-
ciety for  Testing  and  Materials, Philadel-
phia.
  4.  "Carcinogens—Working With   Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare,  Public  Health Service, Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206,  August 1977.
  5.  "OSHA Safety and Health Standards,
General Industry,"  (29 CFR part 1910),  Occu-
pational Safety  and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society  Publica-
tion,  Committee  on  Chemical Safety,  3rd
Edition, 1979.
  7. Provost, L.P.,  and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation  of Percent  Recovery Data," American
Laboratory, 15, 58-63 (1983).  (The  value 2.44
used in the equation in Section 8.3.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  8. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31,  D3370-76. "Standard Practices for  Sam-
pling Water," American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  9. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetric, DPD-FAS)
and  330.5  (Spectrophotometric, DPD)  for
Chlorine Total Residual," Methods for Chem-
ical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA-600/
4-79-020,   U.S.   Environmental  Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port Laboratory,   Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268,
March 1979.
  10. "EPA  Method Study 15,  Method 605
(Benzidines),"  EPA 600/4-84-062,   National
Technical Information  Service, PB84-211176,
Springfield, Virginia 22161, June 1984.
  11. "EPA Method Validation Study 15,
Method 605 (Benzidines)," Report  for  EPA
Contract 68-03-2624 (In preparation).
                                          95

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 605
40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
             TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Parameter

3.3'-Dichlorobenzidine 	
Retention
time (mm)
6 1
121
Column ca-
pacity factor
00
1 44
384
Method de-
tection limit
(ug/L)
008
0.13
  HPLC Column conditions. Lichrosorb RP-2, 5 micron particle size, in a 25 cmx4 6 mm ID stainless steel column. Mobile
Phase: 0.8 mL/mm of 50% acetonitrile/50% 0 1M pH 4 7 acetate buffer The MDL were determined using an electrochemical de-
tector operated at +0 8 V

                        TABLE 2—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 605
Parameter

3 S'-Dichlorobenzidine ... 	
Test
cone (ng/
50
50
Limit for s
(ug/L)
187
236
Range for
X (ug/L)
9 1-61 0
187-500
Range for
P, Ps
(percent)
D-140
5-128
  s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 824)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 824)
  P, P^Percent recovery measured (Section 8.3 2, Section 8.4.2).
  D=Detected, result must be greater than zero.
  Note: These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 3. Where necessary, the limits for recovery
have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3

  TABLE 3—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 605
Parameter

3.3'-Dichlorobenzidme 	 	 	 . .
Accuracy, as
recovery,
X'(ug/L)
0.70C+0.06
0 66C+0 23
Single analyst
precision, s/
(ug/L)
0.28X+0.19
039X-005
Overall preci-
sion, S' (tig/L)
0.40X+0 18
0 38X+0 02
  X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in jig/L.
  s/=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in n
  S'=Expected interlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in
  C=True value for the concentration, in |ig/L
  X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in jig/L
                                                  96

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 605
        COLUMN: LICHROSORB RP-2
        MOBILE PHASE: 50% ACETONITRILE IN ACETATE BUFFER
        DETECTOR: ELECTROCHEMICAL AT + 0.8 V
                               Z
                               5
                               N
                               m
                               i
                               O
                               U
                               co
                               CO
                         6      12
                    RETENTION TIME, MIN.
         Figure  1.   Liquid chromatogram
                     of benzidines.
                             97

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 606
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
      METHOD 606—PHTHALATE ESTER

          1. Scope and Application
  1.1  Tills method covers the determination
of certain phthalate esters. The following pa-
rameters can be determined by this method:
Parameter
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate 	
Di-n-butyl phthalate 	
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate 	 	

STORET
No
39100
34292
39110
34336
34341
34596

CAS No.
117_81_7
85-68-7
84-74-2
84-66-2
131-11-3
117-84-0

  1.2  This is a gas  chromatographic (GC)
method applicable to the determination of
the compounds listed above in municipal and
industrial discharges as provided under 40
CFR 136.1. When this method is used to ana-
lyze unfamiliar samples for any or all of the
compounds above, compound identifications
should be supported  by at  least  one addi-
tional qualitative technique. This  method
describes analytical conditions for a second
gas chromatographic column that  can  be
used  to confirm measurements made with
the primary column. Method 625 provides gas
chromatograph/mass  spectrometer (GO/MS)
conditions appropriate  for  the qualitative
and quantitative confirmation of results for
all of the  parameters  listed above, using the
extract produced by this method.
  1.3  The method detection limit  (MDL, de-
fined  in Section 14.1)1 for each parameter is
listed  in Table  1. The  MDL for  a  specific
wastewater may differ from  those  listed, de-
pending upon the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.4  The sample extraction and concentra-
tion steps in this method are essentially the
same  as in  Methods  608, 609, 611, and  612.
Thus,  a single sample may  be extracted to
measure the  parameters included  in  the
scope of each of these methods. When clean-
up is required, the concentration levels must
be high enough to permit selecting aliquots,
as necessary, to apply  appropriate  cleanup
procedures. The  analyst is allowed the lati-
tude,    under   Section   12,   to   select
chromatographic conditions appropriate for
the simultaneous measurement of combina-
tions  of these parameters.
  1.5  Any modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as a major modification subject to
application  and approval of alternate test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.6  This method is  restricted to use by or
under the supervision  of analysts  experi-
enced in the use of a gas chromatograph  and
in the interpretation  of gas  chromatograms.
Each  analyst must demonstrate the ability
to  generate  acceptable results  with  this
method using the procedure described in Sec-
tion 8.2.
           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A  measured  volume  of sample,  ap-
proximately 1-L, is  extracted with meth-
ylene chloride using a separatory funnel. The
methylene chloride extract is dried and ex-
changed to hexane during concentration to a
volume of 10 mL or less. The extract is sepa-
rated  by  gas  chromatography  and   the
phthalate esters are then measured with an
electron capture detector.2
  2.2  Analysis  for phthalates is especially
complicated by their ubiquitous occurrence
in the environment. The method  provides
Florisil and alumina column cleanup proce-
dures  to  aid in  the elimination of inter-
ferences that may be encountered.

              3. Interferences

  3.1  Method interferences  may be caused
by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that  lead  to discrete artifacts and/or  ele-
vated baselines in gas chromatograms. AH of
these  materials  must  be routinely  dem-
onstrated to be free from interferences under
the conditions  of the analysis  by running
laboratory reagent  blanks as  described in
Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1 Glassware   must  be   scrupulously
cleaned.3 Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
sible  after use by rinsing with the last  sol-
vent used in it.  Solvent rinsing should be fol-
lowed by detergent washing with hot water,
and  rinses with tap water  and  distilled
water. The glassware should then be drained
dry, and heated in a muffle furnace at 400 °C
for 15 to  30 min. Some thermally stable ma-
terials, such as  PCBs, may not be eliminated
by this treatment. Solvent rinses with ace-
tone  and  pesticide  quality hexane may be
substituted for the  muffle furnace heating.
Thorough rinsing with such solvents usually
eliminates  PCB  interference.  Volumetric
ware  should not be  heated in a muffle fur-
nace. After drying  and cooling, glassware
should be sealed and stored in a clean envi-
ronment   to prevent any accumulation of
dust or other contaminants.  Store inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2 The use of high purity reagents  and
solvents helps to minimize interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required.
  3.2  Phthalate esters are contaminants in
many products commonly found in the lab-
oratory. It is particularly important to avoid
the use of plastics  because  phthalates  are
commonly used as plasticizers and are easily
extracted  from plastic  materials.  Serious
phthalate contamination can result at  any
time,  if  consistent  quality control is  not
practiced. Great care must be experienced to
prevent  such  contamination.  Exhaustive
cleanup of reagents and glassware may be re-
quired to  eliminate background phthalate
contamination.4-5
                                          98

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 606
  3.3  Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are co-extracted from the
sample. The extent of matrix interferences
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending' upon the nature and diversity  of
the industrial complex or municipality being
sampled. The  cleanup procedures  in Section
11 can be used  to overcome many  of these
interferences,  but unique samples  may re-
quire  additional   cleanup  approaches   to
achieve the MDL listed in Table 1.

                 4. Safety
  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity  of
each  reagent  used in this method  has not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as  a  poten-
tial health hazard. From this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be  reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever  means
available. The laboratory is responsible for
maintaining' a  current  awareness  file  of
OSHA regulations  regarding the safe han-
dling of the  chemicals specified in  this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made  available to all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional references to laboratory  safety
are available and have been identified 6~8 for
the information of the analyst.

         5. Apparatus and Materials
  5.1  Sampling equipment,  for discrete  or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1 Grab  sample  bottle—1-L or  1-qt,
amber glass, fitted  with a screw cap lined
with Teflon. Foil may be substituted for  Tef-
lon if the sample  is not corrosive. If  amber
bottles  are  not available,  protect  samples
from light. The  bottle and cap liner must  be
washed, rinsed  with acetone or  methylene
chloride, and  dried  before use  to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2 Automatic  sampler  (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample  con-
tainers  for the  collection of a  minimum  of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must  be
kept refrigerated at 4 °C and protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler  uses
a  peristaltic  pump,  a minimum  length  of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may  be
used.  Before use, however, the compressible
tubing  should be  thoroughly  rinsed with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize the potential for
contamination of the sample. An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All specifications  are  sug-
gested. Catalog  numbers are included for  il-
lustration only).
  5.2.1 Separatory funnel—2-L, with Teflon
stopcock.
  5.2.2 Drying   column—Chromatographic
column, approximately 400 mm long  x 19  mm
ID, with coarse frit filter disc.
  5.2.3 Chromatographic  column—300  mm
long x 10 mm ID, with Teflon stopcock and
coarse frit filter disc at bottom (Kontes K-
420540-0213 or equivalent).
  5.2.4 Concentrator  tube,  Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL, graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration must be checked
at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass  stopper is used to  prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.5 Evaporative flask,  Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL (Kontes K-570001-0500  or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.6 Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Three-ball macro  (Kontes K-503000-0121 or
equivalent).
  5.2.7 Snyder  column,   Kuderna-Danish—
Two-ball  micro  (Kontes  K-569001-0219 or
equivalent).
  5.2.8 Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.3  Boiling   chips—Approximately   10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C for 30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract  with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water  bath—Heated, with concentric
ring cover,  capable of temperature  control
(±2 °C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5  Balance—Analytical,  capable of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.6  Gas   chromatograph—An   analytical
system complete with  gas  chromatograph
suitable  for on-column injection and all re-
quired accessories including  syringes,  ana-
lytical columns, gases,  detector, and strip-
chart  recorder. A data   system   is  rec-
ommended for measuring peak areas.
  5.6.1 Column 1—1.8  m long  x 4 mm ID
glass,  packed with 1.5% SP-2250/1.95%  SP-
2401 Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) or equivalent.
This column was used to develop the method
performance statemelts in  Section 14. Guide-
lines   for  the  use  of alternate   column
packings are provided in Section 12.1.
  5.6.2 Column 2—1.8  m long  x 4 mm ID
glass, packed with 3% OV-1 on Supelcoport
(100/120 mesh) or equivalent.
  5.6.3 Detector—Electron capture detector.
This  detector  has proven  effective in the
analysis  of wastewaters for the parameters
listed in the scope (Section 1.1), and was used
to develop the method performance state-
ments in Section 14. Guidelines for the use of
alternate detectors  are provided in  Section
12.1.

                6. Reagents

  6.1  Reagent water—Reagent water is de-
fined  as  a water in which an interferent is
not observed at the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Acetone, hexane, isooctane, methylene
chloride,  methanol—Pesticide   quality  or
equivalent.
  6.3  Ethyl ether—nanograde, redistilled in
glass if necessary.
  6.3.1 Ethyl ether must be shown to be free
of peroxides before it is used as indicated by
                                          99

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 606
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
EM  Laboratories Quant test strips.  (Avail-
able from  Scientific Products Co., Cat. No.
P1126-8, and other suppliers.)
  6.3.2 Procedures   recommended  for  re-
moval of peroxides are provided with the test
strips. After cleanup, 20 mL of ethyl alcohol
preservative must be added to each liter of
ether.
  6.4  Sodium sulfate—(ACS) Granular, an-
hydrous. Several levels of purification may
be required in order to reduce background
phthalate  levels to an acceptable level: 1)
Heat 4 h at 400 °C in a  shallow tray, 2) Heat
16 h  at 450 to 500  °C  in a shallow tray, 3)
Soxhlet extract with methylene chloride for
48 h.
  6.5  Florisil—PR  grade (60/100 mesh). Pur-
chase activated at  1250 °F and store in the
dark  in glass containers with ground glass
stoppers  or foil-lined screw caps. To prepare
for use, place  100 g of Florisil into a 500-mL
beaker and heat for approximately  16 h at 40
°C. After heating transfer to a 500-mL  rea-
gent  bottle. Tightly seal and  cool to room
temperature. When cool add 3 mL of reagent
water. Mix thoroughly by shaking or rolling
for 10 min and let  it stand for at least 2 h.
Keep the bottle sealed tightly.
  6.6  Alumina—Neutral activity  Super I,
W200  series (ION Life  Sciences  Group, No.
404583). To  prepare for use,  place 100 g of alu-
mina into  a 500-mL beaker and heat  for ap-
proximately 16  h at 400  °C.  After heating
transfer to a 500-mL reagent bottle. Tightly
seal  and cool  to room temperature.  When
cool  add 3 mL of reagent  water. Mix thor-
oughly by  shaking  or rolling for 10 min and
let it stand for at least 2 h. Keep the bottle
sealed tightly.
  6.7  Stock standard solutions (1.00 ug/n.L)—
Stock standard solutions  can  be  prepared
from  pure  standard materials or purchased
as certified solutions.
  6.7.1 Prepare stock standard solutions by
accurately weighing about 0.0100 g of pure
material. Dissolve the material in isooctane
and dilute  to volume in a  10-mL volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity  is assayed to be  96% or greater, the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate the  concentration of the stock stand-
ard.  Commercially  prepared stock standards
can be used at any  concentration if they are
certified by the manufacturer or by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.7.2 Transfer  the  stock  standard solu-
tions into Teflon-sealed screw-cap bottles.
Store at 4  °C  and protect from light. Stock
standard solutions should be checked  fre-
quently for signs of  degradation or  evapo-
ration,  especially  just prior  to  preparing
calibration standards from  them.
  6.7.3 Stock  standard  solutions must be re-
placed after six months, or sooner if com-
parison with  check  standards indicates  a
problem.
  6.8  Quality  control  check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration

  7.1  Establish gas  chromatograph  oper-
ating conditions equivalent to those given in
Table  1. The gas chromatographic system
can be calibrated using the external standard
technique (Section 7.2) or the internal stand-
ard technique (Section 7.3).
  7.2  External standard  calibration proce-
dure:
  7.2.1 Prepared calibration standards at a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each  parameter of interest  by adding vol-
umes of one or more  stock standards to a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
isooctane.  One of the  external  standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the MDL (Table 1) and the other concentra-
tions  should correspond to the  expected
range  of concentrations found in real sam-
ples or should define the working range of
the detector.
  7.2.2 Using injections of 2 to 5 (iL, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against the mass injected. The re-
sults  can be used to prepare a  calibration
curve  for each compound. Alternatively, if
the ratio of  response  to  amount injected
(calibration factor) is a constant  over the
working range (<10% relative standard devi-
ation, RSD), linearity through the origin can
be assumed and the average ratio or calibra-
tion factor can be used in place of a calibra-
tion curve.
  7.3  Internal  standard calibration  proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select  one or more internal standards that
are similar in analytical behavior to  the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate that  the measurement of
the internal  standard  is  not  affected  by
method or matrix interferences.  Because of
these limitations,  no internal standard can
be suggested that is applicable to all sam-
ples.
  7.3.1 Prepare calibration standards  at  a
minimum of three  concentration levels for
each  parameter of interest  by adding vol-
umes of one or more  stock  standards to a
volumetric flash. To each calibration stand-
ard, add a known constant amount of one or
more  internal  standards,  and dilute to vol-
ume with isooctane.  One of the standards
should be at a concentraton near, but above,
the  MDL  and the  other  concentrations
should correspond to the expected range of
concentrations found  in real  samples  or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
                                          100

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 606
  7.3.2  Using injections of 2 to 5 \iL, analyze
each  calibration standard  according to Sec-
tion 12  and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against concentration for  each com-
pound and internal standard.  Calculate re-
sponse factors (RF) for each compound using
Equation 1.

         RP=
                                Equation 1

where:
As=Response for the parameter to  be meas-
  ured.
A,,=Response for the internal standard.
Cls=Concentration  of  the internal  standard
  (Hg/L).
C,=Concentration  of  the parameter to  be
  measured (|J,g/L).
  If the RF value over the working range is
a constant (<10% BSD), the RF can be as-
sumed to be invariant  and the average RF
can be used  for calculations. Alternatively,
the results can be used to plot a calibration
curve of response ratios, As/Als, vs. RF.
  7.4  The  working calibration curve,  cali-
bration factor, or RF must be  verified on
each working day by the measurement of one
or more calibration  standards.  If the re-
sponse for any  parameter  varies  from the
predicted response by more than ±15%, a new
calibration curve must be prepared for that
compound.
  7.5  Before using any cleanup procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date  elution patterns  and the  absence  of
interferences from the reagents.

             8. Quality Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of spiked samples  to  evaluate and
document data quality. The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks  are  compared with  established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes indicate  atypical method  perform-
ance,  a quality control check standard must
be analyzed  to  confirm that the  measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1 The analyst must  make an initial,
one-time, demonstration  of the ability  to
generate acceptable accuracy and  precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2 In recognition of advances  that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.4, 11.1, and 12.1) to improve the sepa-
rations or lower the  cost of measurements.
Each time such  a modification is made to
the method, the analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3  Before processing any samples,  the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate  that  interferences from the
analytical system and  glassware  are  under
control. Each time a set of samples  is ex-
tracted or reagents are changed,  a reagent
water blank must be processed as a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4  The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike  and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality. This procedure  is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5  The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is  described in Section
8.4.  The frequency of  the  check  standard
analyses is equivalent to  10%  of all samples
analyzed but may be  reduced  if spike recov-
eries from samples  (Section  8.3)  meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6  The  laboratory  must  maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To establish the ability to generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality contrml (QC) check sample
concentrate  is required containing each pa-
rameter of  interest  at  the  following con-
centrations in acetone:  butyl  benzyl phthal-
ate, 10 ng/mL; bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, 50
Hg/mL;  di-n-octyl phthalate, 50 ng/mL; any
other phthlate, 25 ng/mL. The QC check sam-
ple concentrate must be  obtained  from  the
U S. Environmental Protection Agancy, En-
vironmental  Monitoring and  Support Lab-
oratory in Cincinnati, Ohio, if available. If
not available from that source, the QC check
sample  concentrate must be  obtained from
another  external source.  If  not  available
from either source above,  the QC check sam-
ple concentrate must  be prepared by the lab-
oratory using stock standards  prepared inde-
pendently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet, prepare QC check sam-
ples at the  test  concentrations  shown  in
Table 2 by adding 1.00 mL of QC check sam-
ple concentrate to each of four 1-L aliquots
of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze  the  well-mixed  QC check
samples according to the method  beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the average recovery (X) in
Hg/L,  and the standard  deviation of the re-
covery (s) in |ig/L, for each parameter using
the four results.
                                         101

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 606
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  8.2.5  For each parameter compare s and X
with  the  corresponding  acceptance criteria
for precision  and  accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 2.  If s and X for all param-
eters  of interest  meet the acceptance  cri-
teria, the system  performance is acceptable
and analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any individual s exceeds the precision limit
or any  individual  X falls outside the range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter. Locate  and
correct  the source of the problem and repeat
the test for all parameters of interest begin-
ning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The  laboratory must,  on an  ongoing1
basis, spike at least 10% of the samples from
each  sample  site being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing one to
ten samples per month,  at least one spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If, as  in compliance  monitoring,
the concentration  of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit, the spike should
be at  that limit or 1 to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the concentration  of  a specific
parameter in  the  sample  is  not being
checked against a limit  specific to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at the test con-
centration in Section 8.2.2 or 1  to  5 times
higher  than  the background  concentration
determined in  Section 8.3.2, whichever  con-
centration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If it  is impractical  to determine
background levels before spiking (e.g., max-
imum holding  times will be exceeded),  the
spike  concentration should be (1) the regu-
latory concentration limit, if any; or, if none
(2) the larger of either 5 times higher than
the expected  background  concentration or
the test concentration in Section 8.2.2.
  8.3.2  Analyze one sample aliquot to deter-
mine  the background concentration (B) of
each parameter. If necessary,  prepare a new
QC check sample concentrate  (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate for the background  concentra-
tions  in the sample. Spike a second sample
aliquot  with 1.0 mL of the QC check sample
concentrate and analyze it to  determine the
concentration after spiking (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100(A-B)%/T, where T is the known  true
value  of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each  parameter with the corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 2. These
acceptance criteria were calculated to in-
clude  an allowance for error in measurement
of both  the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a  spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent  that  the analyst's  spike to back-
ground ratio approaches 5: 1.9 If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than the
test concentration in Section 8.2.2, the ana-
lyst must use either the QC acceptance cri-
teria in Table  2, or optional QC acceptance
criteria calculated for the specific spike con-
centration. To  calculate optional acceptance
criteria for the recovery of a  parameter:  (1)
Calculate accuracy (X') using the equation in
Table 3, substituting the spike concentration
(T) for C; (2) calculate overall precision (S')
using the equation in Table 3, substituting- X'
for X; (3) calculate the range for recovery at
the spike concentration as (100 X7T)±2.44(100
  8.3.4  If any individual P falls outside the
designated range for recovery, that param-
eter has  failed  the acceptance criteria. A
check  standard  containing  each parameter
that failed the criteria must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
criteria for recovery  in Section  8.3,  a QC
check  standard  containing  each parameter
that failed must  be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the number of  parameters  being simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance of the labora-
tory.
  8.4.1  Prepare  the QC check standard by
adding  1.0  mL  of  QC check sample  con-
centrate (Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L of rea-
gent water.  The QC check  standard  needs
only to contain  the parameters that failed
criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2  Analyze  the QC check standard  to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (P,) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3  Compare  the percent recovery (Ps)
for each parameter  with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 2. Only
parameters that  failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared with  these criteria. If
the recovery of any  such parameter falls out-
side the  designated range,  the laboratory
performance for  that parameter is judged to
be out of control, and the problem must be
immediately identified and  corrected. The
analytical result for that parameter in the
unspiked sample is suspect and may  not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,  method accuracy  for wastewater
samples must be assessed and records must
be  maintained.  After the  analysis of five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate  the average percent recovery (P)
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (Sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent recovery interval from P - 2Sp to
P+2sp. If P=90% and Sp=10%, for example, the
accuracy  interval is expressed as 70-110%.
                                         102

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 606
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on a regular basis (e.g. after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6  It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this method. The specific prac-
tices that are most productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates may be ana-
lyzed to assess the precision of the environ-
mental measurements. When doubt exists
over the identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas chromatography  with a dissimilar col-
umn,   specific  element  detector,  or mass
spectrometer must be used. Whenever pos-
sible, the laboratory should analyze standard
reference materials and participate  in rel-
evant performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  Grab  samples  must  be collected  in
glass   containers.  Conventional   sampling
practices10 should be followed,  except  that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with sample
before collection. Composite samples should
be collected  in refrigerated glass containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program.  Automatic  sampling  equipment
must  be as free as  possible of Tygon tubing
and other potential  sources  of contamina-
tion.
  9.2  All samples  must be  iced  or  refrig-
erated at 4  °C from  the time of  collection
until extraction.
  9.3  All samples must be extracted within 7
days of collection and  completely analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.2

            10. Sample Extraction
  10.1  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the  sample bottle for later determination
of sample volume.  Pour the  entire  sample
into a 2-L separatory funnel.
  10.2  Add 60 mL of  methylene chloride  to
the sample  bottle,  seal, and  shake 30  s  to
rinse the  inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to the  separatory  funnel  and  extract the
sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min. with
periodic  venting to release excess  pressure.
Allow the organic layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 min. If the
emulsion  interface  between layers is more
than one-third the volume  of  the solvent
layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phrase separa-
tion. The optimum technique depends upon
the sample,  but may include stirring, filtra-
tion of the emulsion through glass wool, cen-
trifugation,  or  other physical methods. Col-
lect the methylene  chloride extract in a 250-
mL Erlenmeyer flask.
  10.3   Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
ylene chloride to the  sample  bottle and re-
peat the extraction procedure a second time,
combining the extracts in the Erlenmeyer
flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
manner.
  10.4  Assemble  a  Kuderna-Danish  (K-D)
concentrator by attaching a 10-mL concen-
trator tube to a 500-mL evaporative flask.
Other  concentrator devices or techniques
may be  used in  place  of the  K-D concen-
trator if the requirements of Section 8.2 are
met.
  10.5  Pour the combined extract through a
solvent-rinsed  drying  column  containing
about  10  cm  of anhydrous sodium sulfate,
and collect the extract in the K-D concen-
trator. Rinse the Erlenmeyer flask and col-
umn with 20 to 30 mL of methylene chloride
to complete the quantitative transfer.
  10.6  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
the evaporative flask and attach a three-ball
Snyder column. Prewet  the Snyder column
by adding about 1 mL of methylene chloride
to the top. Place the K-D apparatus on a hot
water bath (60 to 65 °C) so that the concen-
trator tube is partially  immersed in the hot
water, and the entire lower rounded surface
of the flask is bathed with hot vapor. Adjust
the vertical  position of the apparatus and
the water temperature  as required to com-
plete  the  concentration in 15 to 20 min. At
the proper rate of distillation the balls of the
column will actively chatter but the cham-
bers will not  flood with condensed solvent.
When the apparent  volume of liquid reaches
1 mL, remove the K-D apparatus and allow it
to drain and cool for at least 10 min.
  10.7  Increase the  temperature of the hot
water bath to about 80 °C. Momentarily re-
move  the  Snyder  column, add 50 mL  of
hexane and a new boiling chip,  and reattach
the Snyder column. Concentrate the extract
as in  Section 10.6, except use hexane  to
prewet the column.  The elapsed  time of con-
centration should be 5 to 10 min.
  10.8  Remove the  Snyder column and rinse
the flask and its lower joint into the concen-
trator tube with 1 to 2 mL of hexane. A 5-mL
syringe is recommended for this operation.
Adjust the extract volume to 10 mL. Stopper
the concentrator tube and store refrigerated
if further processing will not be performed
immediately.  If the extract  will  be  stored
longer than two  days,  it should  be trans-
ferred  to  a  Teflon-sealed screw-cap vial. If
the sample extract requires no further clean-
up, proceed with gas chromatographic anal-
ysis (Section 12).  If the  sample  requires fur-
ther cleanup, proceed to Section  11.
  10.9  Determine the  original   sample  vol-
ume by refilling the sample bottle to the
mark and transferring the liquid to a 1000-
mL graduated cylinder.  Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5 mL.

         11. Cleanup and Separation

  11.  Cleanup procedures may  not be  nec-
essary for a relatively clean sample matrix.
If particular circumstances demand the use
                                         103

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 606
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of a cleanup procedure, the analyst may use
either procedure  below or any other appro-
priate procedure. However, the analyst first
must  demonstrate that the  requirements of
Section 8.2 can be met using the method as
revised to incorporate the cleanup proce-
dure.
  11.2  If the entire extract  is to be cleaned
up by one of the  following procedures, it
must  be concentrated to 2.0  mL. To the con-
centrator tube in Section 10.8,  add a clean
boiling chip  and attach  a  two-ball  micro-
Snyder column.  Prewet the column by add-
ing about 0.5 mL  of hexane to the top. Place
the micro-K-D apparatus on a hot water bath
(80 °C) so that the concentrator tube is par-
tially immersed in the hot water. Adjust the
vertical  position of the apparatus and the
water  temperature as required  to complete
the concentration in 5 to 10 min. At the prop-
er rate of distillation the balls of the column
will actively chatter  but  the chambers will
not flood. When the apparent volume of liq-
uid reaches about 0.5  mL, remove the K-D
apparatus and allow it to drain and cool for
at least  10 min.  Remove the micro-Snyder
column and  rinse its lower joint  into the
concentrator tube with 0.2 mL of hexane. Ad-
just the final volume to 2.0  mL and proceed
with one of the following cleanup procedures.
  11.3  Florisil column cleanup  for phthalate
esters:
  11.3.1 Place  10  g  of  Florisil  into  a
chromatographic  column.  Tap the column to
settle the Florisil and add 1 cm of anhydrous
sodium sulfate to the top.
  11.3.2 Preelute the  column with 40 mL of
hexane. The  rate for  all elutions  should be
about 2 mL/min. Discard the eluate and just
prior to exposure of the sodium sulfate layer
to the air, quantitatively transfer the" 2-mL
sample extract onto the column using an ad-
ditional  2 mL of hexane to  complete the
transfer. Just prior to exposure of the so-
dium  sulfate layer to the air, add 40 mL of
hexane and continue the elution of the col-
umn. Discard this hexane eluate.
  11.3.3 Next, elute the column with 100 mL
of 20% ethyl ether in hexane (VAT) into a 500-
mL K-D flask equipped with a 10-mL concen-
trator tube. Concentrate the collected  frac-
tion  as in Section 10.6. No solvent exchange
is necessary. Adjust  the  volume of  the
cleaned up extract to  10 mL in the concen-
trator tube  and  analyze  by  gas chroma-
tography (Section 12).
  11.4  Alumina  column cleanup for phthal-
ate esters:
  11.4.1 Place  10  g   of  alumina  into  a
chromatographic  column.  Tap the column to
settle  the alumina and add 1  cm  of anhy-
drous sodium sulfate to the top.
  11.4.2 Preelute the  column with 40 mL of
hexane. The  rate for  all elutions should be
about 2 mL/min. Discard the eluate and just
prior  to exposure of the sodium sulfate layer
to the air, quantitatively transfer the 2-mL
sample extract onto the column using an ad-
ditional  2  mL of hexane  to complete  the
transfer. Just prior  to exposure of the so-
dium sulfate layer to the air, add 35 mL of
hexane and continue the elution of the col-
umn. Discard this hexane eluate.
  11.4.3  Next, elute the column with 140 mL
of 20% ethyl ether in hexane (VAT) into a 500-
mL K-D flask equipped with a 10-mL concen-
trator type. Concentrate the collected frac-
tion as in Section 10.6. No solvent exchange
is necessary. Adjust  the  volume  of  the
cleaned up extract to 10 mL in the concen-
trator tube  and analyze  by  gas  chroma-
tography (Section 12).

          12. Gas Chromatography

  12.1 Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions  for  the  gas  chro-
matograph.  Included in this table are reten-
tion times and  MDL that can be achieved
under these conditions. Examples of the sep-
arations achieved by Column 1 are shown in
Figures 1 and 2. Other packed or capillary
(open-tubular)   columns,   chromatographic
conditions, or detectors may be used  if the
requirements of Section 8.2 are met.
  12.2 Calibrate  the  system daily as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12.3 If the  internal standard  calibration
procedure is being used, the internal staldard
must be added  to the sample extract  and
mixed thoroughly immediately before  injec-
tion into the gas ohromatograph.
  12.4 Inject 2 to 5 uL of the sample extract
or  standard  into  the  gas-chromatograph
using the solvent-flush technique.11 Smaller
(1.0  uL)  volumes may be  injected if  auto-
matic devices are employed. Record the vol-
ume injected to  the nearest 0.05 jiL, and the
resulting peak size in area or peak height
units.
  12.5 Identify the parameters in the sample
by  comparing the  retention times of  the
peaks in the sample chromatogram with
those    of    the    peaks   in   standard
chromatograms.  The width  of the retention
time window used to  make identifications
should be based upon  measurements  of ac-
tual retention time variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three times  the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound  can be used to calculate a sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the analyst should  weigh heavily in the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  12.6 If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range of the system, dilute the ex-
tract and reanalyze.
  12.7 If the measurement  of  the peak re-
sponse is prevented by the presence of  inter-
ferences, further cleanup is required.

              13. Calculations

  13.1 Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
                                          104

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 606
  13.1.1 If the external standard calibration
procedure  is used,  calculate the amount of
material  injected  from the peak response
using  the  calibration curve or calibration
factor determined in Section 7.2.2. The con-
centration in the sample can  be  calculated
from Equation 2.


                             (AXVt)
     Concentration (|^g/L) =     '
                                Equation 2

where:
A=Amount of material injected (ng).
V,=Volume of extract injected (p,L).
V,= Volume of total extract (|i.L).
Vs=Volume of water extracted (mL).
  13.1.2 If the internal standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined in  Section 7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.
  Concentration (ug/L) =
                          ,     ,        ,
                          (Ais)(RF)(V0)
                                Equation 3

where:
A,=Response for the parameter to  be meas-
  ured.
Ala=Response for the internal standard.
Is=Amount  of  internal  standard  added  to
  each extract ((ig).
V0= Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2  Report results in ug/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          14. Method Performance
  14.1  The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.1  The  MDL  concentrations  listed  in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.12
Similar  results were achieved  using rep-
resentative wastewaters. The MDL actually
achieved in a given  analysis will  vary de-
pending on  instrument sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2  This  method has been tested for lin-
earity of spike recovery from reagent water
and has been demonstrated to be applicable
over the  concentration range from 5 x MDL
to 1000 x MDL with the following exceptions:
dimethyl and diethyl phthalate recoveries at
1000 x MDL were low  (70%); bis-2-ethylhexyl
and  di-n-octyl  phthalate  recoveries  at 5 x
MDL were low (60%).12
  14.3  This  method was tested by 16  labora-
tories using reagent water, drinking water,
surface  water,    and    three   industrial
wastewaters  spiked at  six  concentrations
over the range 0.7 to 106 ug/L.13 Single oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter and es-
sentially independent of the sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 3.

                References

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. "Determination of Phthalates in Indus-
trial and Muncipal Wastewaters," EPA 600/4-
81-063, National Technical Information Serv-
ice, PB81-232167, Springfield, Virginia 22161,
July 1981.
  3. ASTM Annual Book of Standards,  Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constituents," American So-
ciety for Testing and Materials, Philadel-
phia.
  4. Giam, C.S., Chan, H.S.,  and Nef,  G.S.
"Sensitive  Method  for  Determination  of
Phthalate Ester Plasticizers in Open-Ocean
Biota Samples," Analytical Chemistry, 47, 2225
(1975).
  5. Giam,  C.S., and  Chan, H.S. "Control of
Blanks in the Analysis of Phthalates in Air
and Ocean Biota Samples," U.S. National Bu-
reau of  Standards, Special Publication  442,
pp. 701-708, 1976.
  6.  "Carcinogens—Working with  Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare,  Public Health Service, Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational  Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  7. "OSHA Safety  and Health Standards,
General  Industry," (29 CFR part 1910), Occu-
pational  Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  8. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion,  Committee   on Chemical Safety,  3rd
Edition,  1979.
  9. Provost L.P., and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation of Percent  Recovery Data," American
Laboratory, 15, 58-63  (1983). (The value  2.44
used in the equation in Section 8.3.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  10. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3370-76.  "Standard Practices for  Sam-
pling Water,"  American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  11. Burke, J.A. "Gas Chromatography for
Pesticide Residue  Analysis; Some Practical
Aspects," Journal of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, 48,1037 (1965).
  12. "Method  Detection Limit and Analyt-
ical Curve Studies,  EPA Methods 606, 607,
and 608," Special letter report for EPA Con-
tract 68-03-2606, U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Environmental Monitoring and
Support  Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268,
June 1980.
                                         105

-------
Pt. 136, App. A,  Meth. 606
                                                                 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  13. "EPA  Method  Study 16  Method  606
(Phthalate Esters),"  EPA  600/4-84-056, Na-
                                                    tional Technical Information Service, PB84-
                                                    211275, Springfield, Virginia 22161, June 1984.
             TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Parameter
Dimethyl phthalate 	 	 . .
Diethyl phthalate ... . . ...
Di-n-butyl phthalate 	 . . 	
Butyl benzyl phthalate . .. ...
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate .... 	
Di-n-octyl phthalate ... . .
Retention time (mm)
Column 1
203
282
865
•694
"892
"162
Column 2
095
1 27
350
"511
"105
•180
Method de-
tection limit
(H9/L)
029
049
036
034
20
30
  Column 1 conditions Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) coated with 1 5% SP-2250/1 95% SP-2401 packed in a 1.8 m long x 4 mm
ID glass column with 5% methane/95% argon carrier gas at 60 mL/mm flow rate Column temperature held isothermal at 180"C,
except where otherwise indicated
  Column 2 conditions Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) coated with 3% OV-1 packed in a 1 8 m long x 4 mm ID glass column with
5% methane/95% argon carrier gas at 60 mL/min flow rate Column temperature held isothermal at 200 °C, except where other-
wise indicated
  "220 °C column temperature

                         TABLE 2—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 606
Parameter
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate . .
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phathalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate .... . 	
Test
cone (ng/
50
10
25
25
25
50
Limit for s
(M9/U
384
42
89
90
95
134
Range for
X (ug/L)
1 2-55 9
57-11 0
10.3-296
1 9-334
1 3-355
D-500
Range for
P P<
(percent)
D-158
30-136
23-136
D-149
D-156
D-114
  s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in jig/L (Section 824)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 824)
  P, Ps=Percent recovery measured (Section 832, Section 842)
  D=Detected, result must be greater than zero
                                                                                     the limits for recovery
 Note These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 3. Where necessary, the Hi
lave been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3

 TABLE 3—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS  FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 606
Parameter
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate , 	
Butyl benzyl phthalate . .
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate . ...
Accuracy, as
recovery, X'
(W3/L)
0 53C+2 02
0 82C+0 1 3
079C+017
070C+013
073C+017
035C-071
Single analyst
precision, s,'
(M/L)
080X-254
0 26X+0 04
0 23X+0 20
0.27X+0 05
026X+0 14
0 38X+0 71
Overall preci-
sion, S' (ug/L)
073X-017
0 25X+0 07
0 29X+0 06
0 45X+0 1 1
0 44X+0 31
0 62X+0 34
  X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in ug/L
  sr'=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ug/L
  S'=Expected mterlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ng/L
  C=True value for the concentration, in fig/L
  X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in ug/L
                                                 106

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 606
         COLUMN: 1.5%SP-2250/1.95%SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
         TEMPERATURE: 180°C
         DETECTOR; ELECTRON CAPTURE
     0   2   4   6   8   10  12
        RETENTION TIME, MIN.

     Figure 1. Gas chromatogram of phthalates.
                            107

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 606
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
          COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
          TEMPERATURE:  220°C
          DETECTOR: ELECTRON CAPTURE

                     <
                     <
                                    <
                                    o
                                    9
                4      8     12     16     18

                 RETENTION TIME. MIN.

          Figure 2.  Gas chromatogram of phthalates.
                                108

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 607
         METHOD 607—NITROSAMINES

           1. Scope and Application
  1.1  This method covers the determination
of certain nitrosamines.  The following pa-
rameters can be determined by this method:
Parameter
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 	
N-Nitrosodtphenylamine 	
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 	
Store! No
34438
34433
34428
CAS No
62-75-9
86-30-6
621-64-7
  1.2  This is a  gas  chromatographic  (GC)
method applicable to the determination of
the parameters listed above in municipal and
industrial  discharges as  provided  under 40
CFE 136.1.  When this  method is used to ana-
lyze unfamiliar samples for any or all of the
compmunds above, compound identifications
should be  supported  by at least one addi-
tional qualitative  technique.  This method
describes analytical conditimns for a second
gas  chromatographic  column  that can  be
used  to  confirm measurements  made  with
the primary column. Method 625 provides gas
chromatograph/mass  spectrometer (GC/MS)
conditions  appropriate for the  qualitative
and quantitative confirmation of results for
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine. In order to con-
firm      the      presence      of      N-
nitrosodiphenylamine, the cleanup procedure
specified in Section 11.3 or 11.4 must be used.
In  order  to  confirm the  presence  of  N-
nitrosodimethylamine by GC/MS, Column 1
of this method must  be substituted for the
column recommended in Method 625.  Con-
firmation of these parameters using GC-high
resolution  mass spectrometry or a Thermal
Energy Analyzer is also recommended. '-2
  1.3  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined in Section 14.1)3 for each parameter is
listed in Table  1.  The MDL  for a specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending upon the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.4  Any  modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as  a  major modification subject to
application and approval of alternate test
procedures  under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.5  This  method  is  restricted to use  by or
under  the  supervision  of analysts experi-
enced in the use of a gas chromatograph and
in the interpretation of gas chromatograms.
Bach  analyst  must demonstrate the ability
to  generate  acceptable results  with  this
method using the procedure described in Sec-
tion 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A measured  volume  of sample,  ap-
proximately  1-L,  is  extracted with  meth-
ylene chloride using a separatory funnel. The
methylene  chloride extract is washed with
dilute  hydrochloric  acid  to  remove  free
amines, dried, and concentrated to a volume
of 10 mL or less. After the extract has been
exchanged to methanol, it is  separated by
gas chromatography and the parameters are
then measured  with  a nitrogen-phosphorus
detector.4
  2.2  The method provides Florisil and alu-
mina column cleanup procedures to separate
diphenylamine from the nitrosamines and to
aid in  the elimination of interferences that
may be encountered.

              3. Interferences

  3.1  Method interferences may be  caused
by contaminants in solvents,  reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that lead  to  discrete artifacts and/or ele-
vated baselines in gas chromatograms. All of
these  materials must be  routinely dem-
onstrated to be free from interferences under
the  conditions  of the analysis by running
laboratory reagent blanks  as  described in
Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1  Glassware  must   be  scrupulously
cleaned.3 Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
sible after use by rinsing with the last sol-
vent used in it. Solvent rinsing should be fol-
lowed by detergent washing with hot water,
and  rinses  with  tap water and  distilled
water.  The glassware should then be drained
dry,  and heated  in a muffle furnace at 400 °C
for 15 to 30 min. Solvent rinses with acetone
and  pesticide quality  hexane  may be sub-
stituted for the  muffle furnace  heating. Vol-
umetric ware should not be heated in a muf-
fle furnace. After drying and cooling,  glass-
ware should be sealed  and stored in a clean
environment to prevent any accumulation of
dust or other contaminants.  Store inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2  The use  of high purity  reagents and
solvents helps to minimize interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required.
  3.2 Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are co-extracted from the
sample. The  extent of matrix  interferences
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending upon  the nature and diversity of
the industrial complex or municipality being
sampled. The cleanup procedures in Section
11 can  be used to overcome  many  of these
interferences,  but unique samples  may  re-
quire  additional  cleanup  approaches  to
achieve the MDL listed in Table 1.
  3.3 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine is reported"
to undergo transnitrosation reactions. Care
must be exercised in the heating or concen-
trating  of solutions  containing this com-
pound in the presence of reactive amines.
  3.4 The sensitive and selective Thermal
Energy Analyzer and the reductive Hall de-
tector may be used in place of the nitrogen-
phosphorus detector when interferences are
encountered.  The Thermal Energy Analyzer
offers the highest selectivity of the non-MS
detectors.
                                         109

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 607
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity of
each reagent used in this method has not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard.  From this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The laboratory is responsible for
maintaining1   a  current  awareness  file of
OSHA  regulations  regarding the safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file  of material data handling
sheets should also  be made  available to all
personnel involved  in the chemical analysis.
Additional references to  laboratory  safety
are available and have been identified '°-12 for
the information of the analyst.
  4.2  These  nitrosamines are  known  car-
cinogens 13-'7' therefore, utmost care must be
exercised in the handling of these materials.
Nitrosamine  reference standards and  stand-
ard solutions should be handled and prepared
in a ventilated  glove box  within  a  properly
ventilated room.

         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling  equipment,  for  discrete or
composite sampling:.
  5.1.1  Grab  sample  bottle—1-L  or  1-qt,
amber glass,  fitted with a screw cap lined
with Teflon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If amber
bottles  are not  available, protect  samples
from light. The  bottle and cap liner must be
washed,  rinsed  with  acetone or  methylene
chloride, and dried before use  to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2  Automatic  sampler  (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate  glass sample con-
tainers for the  collection  of a minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4 °C and protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic  pump,  a minimum length of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may be
used. Before  use, however, the compressible
tubing should  be  thoroughly  rinsed with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled  water to minimize the potential for
contamination of the  sample. An integrating
flowmeter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All  specifications  are sug-
gested. Catalog  numbers are included for il-
lustration only.):
  5.2.1  Separatory funnels—2-L and 250-mL,
with Teflon stopcock.
  5.2.2  Drying   column—Chromatographic
column, approximately 400 mm long x 19 mm
ID, with coarse frit filter disc.
  5.2.3  Concentrator   tube,   Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL,  graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration must be checked
at the volumes employed in the  test. Ground
glass stopper is used to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.4 Evaporative flask, Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL (Kontes K-570001-0500 or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.5 Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Three-ball macro  (Kontes  K-503000-0121 or
equivalent).
  5.2.6 Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Two-ball  micro (Kontes  K-569001-0219  or
equivalent).
  5.2.7 Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.2.8 Chromatographic  column—Approxi-
mately 400 mm long x 22 mm ID, with Teflon
stopcock and coarse frit filter disc at bottom
(Kontes K-420540-0234 or equivalent), for use
in Florisil column cleanup procedure.
  5.2.9 Chromatographic  column—Approxi-
mately 300 mm long x 10 mm ID, with Teflon
stopcock and coarse frit filter disc at bottom
(Kontes K-420540-0213 or equivalent), for use
in alumina column cleanup procedure.
  5.3  Boiling  chips—Approximately   10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C for 30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water  bath—Heated,  with concentric
ring cover,  capable of temperature control
(±2 °C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5  Balance—Analytical, capable  of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.6  Gas   chromatograph—An   analytical
system  complete  with gas  chromatograph
suitable for on-column injection and all re-
quired accessories  including syringes, ana-
lytical columns, gases, detector,  and strip-
chart  recorder.  A  data  system  is  rec-
ommended for measuring peak areas.
  5.6.1  Column 1—1.8 m  long x  4  mm ID
glass, packed with  10%  Carbowax 20 M/2%
KOH on Chromosorb W-AW (80/100 mesh) or
equivalent. This column was used to develop
the method  performance statements in Sec-
tion 14. Guidelines for the use of alternate
column packings  are provided  in  Section
12.2.
  5.6.2 Column 2—1.8 m  long x  4  mm ID
glass, packed with 10% SP-2250  on Supel-
coport (100/120 mesh) or equivalent.
  5.6.3 Detector—Nitrogen-phosphorus,  re-
ductive Hall,  or Thermal  Energy Analyzer
detector.1-2 These detectors have proven ef-
fective in the analysis of wastewaters for the
parameters listed in the scope (Section  1.1).
A  nitrogen-phosphorus detector was used to
develop the  method performance statements
in Section 14. Guidelines for the use  of alter-
nate detectors are provided in Section 12.2.

                6. Reagents

  6.1  Reagent  water—Reagent water  is de-
fined as a water in which an interferent is
not observed at the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Sodium  hydroxide  solution (10 N)—
Dissolve 40 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 100 ml.
                                          110

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 607
  6.3  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.4  Sulfurlo acid (1+1)—Slowly, add 50 mL
of H2SO4 (ACS, sp. gr. 1.84) to 50 mL of rea-
gent water.
  6.5  Sodium sulfate—(ACS) Granular, an-
hydrous. Purify by heating at 400 °C for 4 h
in a shallow tray.
  6.6  Hydrochloric acid (1+9)—Add  one vol-
ume of concentrated HC1 (ACS) to nine vol-
umes of reagent water.
  6.7  Acetone, methanol,  methylene  chlo-
ride,  pentane—Pesticide  quality or  equiva-
lent.
  6.8  Ethyl ether—Nanograde, redistilled in
glass if necessary.
  6.8.1  Ethyl ether must be shown to be free
of peroxides before it is used as indicated by
EM Laboratories  Quant  test strips. (Avail-
able from  Scientific Products Co.,  Cat No.
P1126-8, and other suppliers.)
  6.8.2  Procedures  recommended  for re-
moval of peroxides are provided with the test
strips. After cleanup, 20 mL of ethyl alcohol
preservative  must be added to each  liter of
ether.
  6.9  Florisil—PR grade  (60/100 mesh). Pur-
chase activated at 1250 °F  and  store in the
dark  in glass containers with ground  glass
stoppers or foil-lined screw caps. Before use,
activate each batch at least 16 h at 130 °C in
a foil-covered glass container and allow to
cool.
  6.10  Alumina—Basic   activity  Super   I,
W200  series (ICN  Life Sciences  Group, No.
404571,  or  equivalent). To  prepare  for use,
place 100 g of alumina into a 500-mL reagent
bottle and add 2 mL of reagent water. Mix
the  alumina preparation  thoroughly  by
shaking- or rolling- for 10 min and let it stand
for at least 2 h.  The preparation should be
homogeneous  before use. Keep the bottle
sealed tightly to ensure proper activity.
  6.11  Stock  standard  solutions  (1.00 \igl
jiL)—Stock standard solutions  can be pre-
pared from pure  standard materials  or pur-
chased as certified solutions.
  6.11.1  Prepare stock standard solutions by
accurately weighing about 0.0100 g of pure
material. Dissolve the material  in methanol
and dilute  to  volume in  a 10-mL volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity is  assayed  to  be 96% or  greater, the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate the  concentration  of the  stock stand-
ard. Commercially prepared stock standards
can be used at any concentration if they are
certified by the manufacturer or by  an  inde-
pendent source.
  6.11.2  Transfer  the  stock standard  solu-
tions into  Teflon-sealed  screw-cap  bottles.
Store at 4  °C  and protect from  light. Stock
standard solutions  should  be checked fre-
quently for signs of degradation or evapo-
ration,  especially  just  prior to  preparing
calibration standards from them.
  6.11.3 Stock standard solutions must be
replaced after six months, or sooner  if com-
parison with check  standards indicates a
problem.
  6.12  Quality control  check sample con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration

  7.1  Establish gas  chromatographic  oper-
ating conditions equivalent to those given in
Table  1.  The gas  chromatographic  system
can be calibrated using the external standard
technique (Section  7.2) or the internal stand-
ard technique (Section 7.3).
  7.2  External standard calibration proce-
dure:
  7.2.1  Prepare calibration  standards  at a
minimum of three concentration levels  for
each  parameter  of interest  by adding vol-
umes of one or more stock standards to a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
methanol.  One of the  external  standards
should be at a concentraton near, but above,
the MDL  (Table 1)  and the other concentra-
tions  should correspond  to  the  expected
range  of concentrations found in real  sam-
ples or should define the working range of
the detector.
  7.2.2  Using injections of 2  to 5 |iL, analyze
each calibration  standard according  to Sec-
tion 12 and  tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against the mass  injected.  The  re-
sults can be used  to prepare a  calibration
curve  for each compound. Alternatively, if
the ratio of  response  to  amount injected
(calibration factor) is a constant  over the
working range (<10%  relative standard devi-
ation, RSD), linearity through the origin can
be assumed  and the average ratio or calibra-
tion factor can be used in place of a calibra-
tion curve.
  7.3  Internal  standard calibration  proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select  one or more internal standards that
are similar in analytical behavior  to the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate that  the measurement of
the  internal  standard is  not  affected  by
method or matrix interferences.  Because of
these limitations, no internal standard can
be suggested that is  applicable to all  sam-
ples.
  7.3.1   Prepare calibration  standards  at a
minimum of three  concentration levels for
each parameter of interest  by adding vol-
umes of one or more stock standards to a
volumetric flask. To each calibration stand-
ard, add a known constant amount of one or
more internal standards, and dilute  to vol-
ume with methanol.  One  of the  standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the  MDL  and  the  other  concentrations
should correspond to the expected range of
concentrations found in  real  samples  or
should define the  working range of the detec-
tor.
                                          Ill

-------
Pt.  136, App. A.Meth. 607
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  7.3.2  Using injections of 2 to 5 nL, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against concentration for each com-
pound  and internal  standard.  Calculate re-
sponse factors (RF) for each compound using
Equation 1.
        RF=
                         (A,S)(CS)
                                Equation 1
where:
As=Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration  of  the internal  standard
  (Hg/L).
Cs=Concentration  of  the parameter to  be
  measured (jig/L).
  If the RF value over the working range is
a constant (<10% RSD), the RF can be as-
sumed to be invariant  and the average RF
can be used for calculations.  Alternatively,
the results can be  used  to plot a calibration
curve of response ratios, As/A,,, vs. RF.
  7.4  The  working calibration curve,  cali-
bration factor, or RF must be verified  on
each working day by the measurement of one
or more calibration  standards. If  the re-
sponse for any parameter  varies from the
predicted response by more than ±15%, a new
calibration curve must  be prepared for that
compound.
  7.5  Before using any cleanup procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date  elution patterns  and the  absence  of
interferences from the reagents.

             8. Quality Control
  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis  of spiked samples to evaluate and
document data quality.  The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks are  compared with established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes indicate atypical method  perform-
ance, a quality control check  standard must
be analyzed  to confirm that  the measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1 The analyst must  make an initial,
one-time, demonstration of the ability  to
generate acceptable accuracy  and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in  Section 8.2.
  8.1.2 In recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.4, 11.1, and 12.2) to improve the sepa-
rations  or lower  the cost of measurements.
Each time such  a modification is  made to
the method, the analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3  Before processing any  samples,  the
analyst  must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate that interferences from the
analytical system and  glassware are under
control. Each time a set of samples is ex-
tracted  or reagents are changed, a reagent
water blank must  be processed  as a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4  The  laboratory must, on an  ongoing
basis, spike  and analyze a minimum of  10%
of all samples to monitor and  evaluate  lab-
oratory data quality. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5  The  laboratory must, on an  ongoing
basis, demonstrate  through the analyses of
quality  control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is  described in Section
8.4. The frequency of  the check  standard
analyses is equivalent to  10% of all  samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries from  samples  (Section 8.3) meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6  The  laboratory  must maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2 To establish  the ability to  generate
acceptable accuracy and precision,  the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality control  (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing  each pa-
rameter of interest at a concentration of 20
Hg/mL  in methanol. The QC check sample
concentrate must be obtained from the U.S.
Environmental-Protection Agency,  Environ-
mental  Monitoring and Support Laboratory
in Cincinnati, Ohio, if available. If not avail-
able from that source, the QC check sample
concentrate must be obtained from another
external source. If not available from either
source  above,  the  QC  check  sample  con-
centrate must be prepared by the laboratory
using stock standards prepared independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet, prepare QC check sam-
ples at a concentration of 20 ng/L by adding
1.00 mL of QC check  sample concentrate to
each of four 1-L aliquots of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze   the  well-mixed  QC check
samples according to the method beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the average recovery (X) in
Hg/L, and the standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in ng/L, for each parameter using
the four results.
  8.2.5  For  each parameter compare s and X
with the corresponding acceptance  criteria
for precision and  accuracy,  respectively,
                                          112

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 607
found in Table 2. If s and X for all param-
eters  of interest  meet  the  acceptance cri-
teria,  the system performance is acceptable
and analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any individual s  exceeds the precision limit
or  any individual X falls outside the range
for accuracy,  the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter. Locate and
correct the source of the problem and repeat
the test for all parameters of interest begin-
ning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3   The  laboratory must, on an  ongoing
basis,  spike at least 10% of the samples from
each sample site being  monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing one to
ten samples per month, at  least one spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If, as  in compliance  monitoring,
the concentration of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit,  the spike should
be  at that limit or 1 to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the  concentration of  a specific
parameter  in the  sample  is  not  being
checked against a limit specific to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at 20 (ig/L or 1
to 5 times higher than  the background con-
centration  determined in   Section  8.3.2,
whichever concentration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If it is impractical to determine
background levels before spiking (e.g., max-
imum holding times  will be  exceeded), the
spike  concentration should be (1) the regu-
latory concentration limit, if any; or, if none
(2)  the larger of either  5 times higher than
the expected background concentration or 20
  8.3.2 Analyze one sample aliquot to deter-
mine the background concentration (B) of
each parameter. If necessary, prepare a new
QC check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate for the background concentra-
tions in  the sample. Spike a second  sample
aliquot with 1.0 mL of the QC check  sample
concentrate and analyze it to determine the
concentration after spiking  (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100(A-B)%/T, where T is the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3 Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with the  corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found  in Table 2. These
acceptance criteria were  caluclated  to in-
clude an  allowance for error in measurement
of both the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent that  the analyst's spike to back-
ground ratio approaches  5:1. ls If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than 20
Hg/L, the analyst must use either the  QC ac-
ceptance criteria in Table 2, or optional QC
 acceptance  criteria caluclated  for the spe-
 cific  spike  concentration. To  calculate op-
 tional acceptance crtieria for the recovery of
 a  parameter:  (1)  Calculate  accuracy  (X')
 using the equation in Table 3, substituting
 the spike concentration  (T) for C; (2)  cal-
 culate overall precision (S') using the equa-
 tion in Table 3, substituting X' for X; (3) cal-
 culate the range for recovery at the spike
 concentration as (100 X'/T) ± 2.44(100 S7T)%.18
  8.3.4 If any individual P falls outside the
 designated range for recovery,  that param-
 eter  has  failed  the acceptance  criteria. A
 check standard  containing each parameter
 that  failed the criteria must be analyzed as
 described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
 criteria for recovery  in  Section 8.3, a QC
 check standard  containing each parameter
 that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
 ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
 the number of  parameters  being  simulta-
 neously tested, the  complexity of the sample
 matrix, and the  performance of the labora-
 tory.
  8.4.1 Prepare the QC check  standard by
 adding- 1.0  mL  of QC check sample  con-
 centrate (Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L of rea-
 gent  water. The QC check  standard  needs
 only  to contain  the parameters that  failed
 criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2 Analyze  the QC check  standard  to
 determine the concentration measured (A) of
 each  parameter.  Calculate each  percent re-
 covery (PJ as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
 value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3 Compare  the percent recovery (Ps)
 for each parameter with  the corresponding
 QC acceptance criteria found in Table 2. Only
 parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
 need  to be compared with these criteria. If
 the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
 side  the designated  range,  the laboratory
 performance for that parameter is judged to
 be out of control, and the problem must be
 immediately identified and  corrected. The
 analytical result for that parameter in  the
 unspiked sample is suspect and may not be
 reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the lab-
 oratory,  method accuracy  for wastewater
 samples must be assessed and  records must
 be maintained.  After  the analysis of five
 spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
 calculate the  average percent recovery  (P)
 and the standard deviation of the percent re-
 covery (Sp). Express the accuracy assessment
 as a percent recovery interval from  P - 2sp to
 P+2sp. If P=90% and sp=10%, for example, the
 accuracy interval is  expressed as  70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on  a  regular  basis (e.g. after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6  It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional  quality assurance practices
                                         113

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 607
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
for use with this method. The specific prac-
tices that are most productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates may  be  ana-
lyzed to  assess the precision of the environ-
mental  measurements. When  doubt exists
over the  identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas  chromatography  with  a   dissimilar
column,  specific  element detector, or mass
spectrometer must be used. Whenever pos-
sible, the laboratory should analyze standard
reference materials and participate  in  rel-
evant performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  Grab  samples  must  be  collected in
glass   containers.  Conventional  sampling
practices19 should  be  followed,  except  that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with sample
before collection. Composite samples should
be collected in refrigerated glass containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program.  Automatic  sampling  equipment
must be  as free as possible of Tygon tubing
and other  potential  sources of contamina-
tion.
  9.2  All samples  must be iced  or refrig-
erated at 4 °C from  the time  of  collection
until extraction. Fill the sample bottles and,
if residual  chlorine is present,  add 80 mg of
sodium thiosulfate per liter of sample  and
mix well. EPA Methods  330.4 and 330.5 may
be used  for measurement  of residual chlo-
rine.20  Field test kits are  available for  this
purpose.  If N-nitrosodiphenylamine is to be
determined, adjust the sample pH to 7 to 10
with sodium hydroxide solution or sulfuric
acid.
  9.3  All samples must be extracted within 7
days of collection  and completely analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.4
  9.4  Nitrosamines  are  known  to be light
sensitive.7  Samples  should be  stored  in
amber or foil-wrapped bottles  in order to
minimize photolytic decomposition.

           10. Sample Extraction
  10.1  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the sample bottle for later determination
of sample  volume. Pour the entire sample
into a 2-L separatory funnel. Check the pH
of the sample with wide-range pH paper and
adjust to within the range of 5 to  9 with so-
dium hydroxide solution or sulfuric acid.
  10.2  Add 60 mL of methylene chloride to
the sample bottle, seal, and shake 30 s to
rinse the inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to the separatory funnel  and  extract  the
sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min with
periodic  venting  to release excess pressure.
Allow the organic layer to  separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 min. If the
emulsion interface between layers  is more
than one-third the volume of  the solvent
layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation.
The  optimum technique  depends  upon  the
sample, but may include  stirring, filtration
of the emulsion through glass wool,  cen-
trifugation,  or other physical methods. Col-
lect the methylene chloride extract in a 250-
mL Erlenmeyer flask.
  10.3  Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
ylene chloride to the sample bottle and re-
peat the extraction procedure a second time,
combining the  extracts in  the  Erlenmeyer
flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
manner.
  10.4  Assemble  a  Kuderna-Danish (K-D)
concentrator   by   attaching   a   10-mL
concentrator tube to a 500-mL  evaporative
flask. Other concentration devices or tech-
niques may be used in place of the K-D con-
centrator  if the  requirements of Section 8.2
are met.
  10.5  Add 10 mL of hydrochloric acid to the
combined  extracts and shake  for  2 min.
Allow the layers to separate. Pour the com-
bined extract through a solvent-rinsed dry-
ing column containing about 10 cm of anhy-
drous sodium sulfate, and collect the extract
in the K-D concentrator. Rinse the Erlen-
meyer flask and column with 20 to 30 mL of
methylene chloride  to  complete  the quan-
titative transfer.
  10.6  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
the evaporative flask and  attach a three-ball
Snyder column.  Prewet the  Snyder column
by adding about 1  mL of methylene chloride
to the top. Place the K-D  apparatus on a hot
water bath (60 to  65°C) so that  the  concen-
trator tube is partially  immersed in the  hot
water, and the entire lower rounded surface
of the flask is bathed with hot vapor. Adjust
the vertical position of the apparatus and
the water temperature  as required to com-
plete the  concentration in 15 to 20 min. At
the proper rate of distillation the balls of the
column will actively chatter but the cham-
bers  will  not flood with condensed solvent.
When the  apparent volume of liquid reaches
1 mL, remove the K-D apparatus and allow it
to drain and cool for  at least 10 min.
  10.7  Remove the Snyder column and rinse
the flask and its lower joint into the concen-
trator tube with  1  to  2  mL of methylene
chloride. A 5-mL syringe is recommended for
this   operation.  Stopper  the concentrator
tube and  store refrigerated if further proc-
essing will not be performed immediately. If
the extract  will be  stored longer than two
days, it should  be transferred to a Teflon-
sealed screw-cap  vial.  If   N-nitrosodiphe-
nylamine  is to be  measured by gas chroma-
tography,  the analyst must first use a clean-
up column to eliminate  diphenylamine inter-
ference     (Section     11).     If     N-
nitrosodiphenylamine is of  no interest,  the
analyst may  proceed  directly  with  gas
chromatographic analysis (Section 12).
                                          114

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 607
  10.8  Determine  the original  sample vol-
ume by refilling the sample bottle  to the
mark and transferring the liquid to a 1000-
mL graduated cylinder. Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5 mL.

         11. Cleanup and Separation

  11.1  Cleanup procedures may not be nec-
essary for a relatively clean sample matrix.
If particular circumstances demand the use
of a cleanup procedure,  the analyst may use
either procedure below  or any other appro-
priate procedure. However, the analyst first
must demonstrate that the requirements of
Section 8.2 can be met  using the method as
revised to incorporate   the  cleanup  proce-
dure.  Diphenylamine, if present in the origi-
nal sample extract, must be separated from
the nitrosamines if  N-nitrosodiphenylamine
is to be determined by this method.
  11.2  If the entire extract is to be cleaned
up by one of the following procedures, it
must  be concentrated to 2.0 mL. To the con-
centrator tube in  Section 10.7,  add a clean
boiling chip  and attach a two-ball  micro-
Snyder column. Prewet the column by add-
ing about 0.5  mL  of methylene chloride to
the top. Place the micr-K-D apparatus on a
hot water bath (60 to 65 °C) so that the con-
centrator tube is partially immersed in the
hot water. Adjust the vertical position of the
apparatus and the water temperature  as re-
quired to  complete the concentration in 5 to
10 min. At the proper rate of distillation the
balls of the column will actively chatter but
the chambers will not flood. When the appar-
ent volume of liquid reaches about 0.5 mL,
remove the  K-D apparatus and allow it to
drain and cool for at least 10 min. Remove
the micro-Snyder column and rinse its lower
joint into the  concentrator tube with 0.2 mL
of methylene  chloride. Adjust the final vol-
ume to 2.0 mL and proceed with one of the
following cleanup procedures.
  11.3  Florisil column   cleanup for  nitro-
samines:
  11.3.1  Place 22 g of activated Florisil into
a  22-mm  ID  chromatographic column. Tap
the column to settle the Florisil and add
about 5 mm of anhydrous sodium  sulfate to
the top.
  11.3.2  Preelute the column with 40 mL of
ethyl  ether/pentane (15+85)(V/V). Discard the
eluate and just prior to exposure of the so-
dium sulfate layer to the air, quantitatively
transfer the 2-mL sample  extract onto  the
column using  an additional 2 mL of pentane
to complete the transfer.
  11.3.3  Blute the column  with 90 mL  of
ethyl  ether/pentane (15+85XV/V) and discard
the eluate. This fraction  will contain  the
diphenylamine, if it is present in the extract.
  11.3.4  Next, elute the  column with 100 mL
of acetone/ethyl ether (5+95XV/V) into  a 500-
mL K-D flask  equipped with a 10-mL concen-
trator tube. This fraction will contain all of
the nitrosamines listed in the scope of the
method.
  11.3.5 Add 15 mL of methanol to the col-
lected fraction and concentrate as in Section
10.6, except use pentane to prewet the col-
umn and  set the water bath  at 70 to 75 °C.
When the apparatus is cool, remove the Sny-
der column and rinse  the flask and its lower
joint into the concentrator tube with 1 to 2
mL  of pentane.  Analyze  by  gas chroma-
tography (Section 12).
  11.4  Alumina  column cleanup for  nitro-
samines:
  11.4.1 Place 12 g of the  alumina prepara-
tion   (Section  6.10)   into  a   10-mm  ID
chromatographic column. Tap the column to
settle the alumina and add  1 to 2 cm of anhy-
drous sodium sulfate to the top.
  11.4.2 Preelute the  column with 10 mL of
ethyl  ether/pentane (3+7XV/V).  Discard  the
eluate (about 2 mL) and just  prior to expo-
sure of the sodium sulfate layer to the air,
quantitatively transfer the 2 mL sample ex-
tract onto the column using an additional 2
mL of pentane to complete  the transfer.
  11.4.3 Just prior to  exposure of the sodium
sulfate layer to  the air, add 70 mL of ethyl
ether/pentane (3+7)(V/V). Discard the first 10
mL of eluate. Collect the  remainder of the
eluate in  a 500-mL K-D flask  equipped with
a  10 mL  concentrator  tube.  This fraction
contains N-nitrosodiphenylamine and prob-
ably a small amount of N-nitrosodi-n-propyl-
amine.
  11.4.4 Next, elute the column with 60 mL
of ethyl ether/pentane (1+1)(V/V), collecting
the eluate in a second K-D  flask equipped
with a 10-mL concentrator tube. Add 15 mL
of methanol to the K-D flask. This fraction
will  contain  N-nitrosodimethylamine, most
of the  N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine and any
diphenylamine that is present.
  11.4.5 Concentrate  both fractions   as  in
Section 10.6,  except use pentane to prewet
the column. When the apparatus is cool, re-
move the  Snyder column and rinse the flask
and  its lower joint into  the  concentrator
tube with 1 to 2 mL of pentane. Analyze the
fractions  by  gas chromatography  (Section
12).

          12. Gas Chromatography
  12.1  N-nitrosodiphenylamine   completely
reacts  to form diphenylamine  at the normal
operating temperatures of a  GC injection
port  (200  to  250 °C).  Thus,  N-nitrosodi-
phenylamine  is   chromatographed  and  de-
tected  as  diphenylamine.  Accurate  deter-
mination  depends on  removal of diphenyla-
mine that may be present in the original ex-
tract prior to GC analysis (See Section 11).
  12.2  Table 1 summarizes  the recommended
operating  conditions  for   the  gas   chro-
matograph. Included in this table are reten-
tion times and MDL  that  can be achieved
under these conditions. Examples of the sep-
arations achieved by Column 1 are shown in
                                         115

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 607
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Figures 1 and 2.  Other packed or capillary
(open-tubular)  columns,   chromatographic
conditions, or detectors may be used if the
requirements of Section 8.2 are met.
  12.3  Calibrate  the system  daily as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12.4  If the extract has not been subjected
to one of the cleanup procedures in Section
11, it is  necessary to exchange the solvent
from methylene chloride to methanol before
the thermionic detector can be used. To a 1
to 10-mL  volume of methylene chloride ex-
tract in  a concentrator tube, add 2 mL of
methanol and a clean boiling chip. Attach a
two-ball  micro-Snyder column to  the  con-
centrator tube. Prewet the column by adding
about  0.5 mL  of  methylene chloride to  the
top.  Place the micro-K-D apparatus  on  a
boiling (100 °C) water bath so  that the  con-
centrator tube is partially immersed in the
hot water. Adjust the vertical position of the
apparatus and the water temperature as re-
quired to  complete the concentration in 5 to
10 min. At the proper rate of distillation the
balls of the column will actively chatter but
the chambers will not flood. When the appar-
ent volume of liquid reaches about 0.5 mL,
remove the K-D  apparatus and allow it to
drain and cool for at least 10 min.  Remove
the micro-Snyder column and rinse its lower
joint into the concentrator tube with 0.2 mL
of methanol. Adjust the final volume to 2.0
mL.
  12.5  If  the internal standard calibration
procedure is being used, the internal stand-
ard must be added to the sample extract and
mixed thoroughly immediately before injec-
tion into the gas chromatograph.
  12.6  Inject 2 to 5 nL of the sample extract
or standard  into the  gas chromatograph
using the solvent-flush technique.21  Smaller
(1.0 \iL)  volumes may be  injected  if  auto-
matic devices are employed. Record the vol-
ume injected to the nearest 0.05 nL, and the
resulting  peak size in area or peak height
units.
  12.7  Identify the parameters in the sample
by comparing the  retention  times of  the
peaks  in the sample chromatogram with
those   of   the   peaks   in    standard
chromatograms.  The width of the retention
time  window used  to make identifications
should be based  upon measurements of ac-
tual retention time  variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three times  the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound can be used to calculate a  sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the analyst should weigh heavily in the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  12.8  If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range of the system, dilute the ex-
tract and reanalyze.
  12.9  If  the measurement of the peak re-
sponse is prevented by the presence of inter-
ferences, further cleanup is required.
              13. Calculations

  13.1  Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  13.1.1  If the external standard calibration
procedure is  used, calculate the amount of
material injected  from  the  peak  response
using the calibration  curve  or calibration
factor determined  in Section 7.2.2. The  con-
centration in the sample can be calculated
from Equation 2.
     Concentration (|ag/L) =
          (A)(Vt)
         (v,)(vs)
                                Equation 2
where:
A=Amount of material injected (ng).
V,=Volume of extract injected (nL).
V,=Volume of total extract (|j.L).
V,=Volume of water extracted (mL).
  13.1.2  If the internal standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the  concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined in Section 7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.
             RF =
(AS)(C1S)

(Ais)(Cs)
                                Equation 3

where:
As=Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,,=Response for the internal standard.
I5=Amount of  internal standard added  to
  each extract (jig).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2 Report results in (ig/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          14. Method Performance

  14.1 The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined  as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that  the value is above
zero.3 The MDL  concentrations listed  in
Table 1  were obtained using reagent water.22
Similar  results  were  achieved  using:  rep-
resentative wastewaters. The MDL actually
achieved in a given analysis will vary de-
pending  on instrument sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2 This method has been tested  for lin-
earity of spike recovery from reagent water
and has been demonstrated to be applicable
over the concentration range from 4 x MDL
to 1000 x MDL.22
  14.3 This method was tested by 17 labora-
tories using reagent water, drinking water,
surface    water,    and   three    industrial
wastewaters spiked at six  concentrations
                                         116

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 607
over the range 0.8 to 55 ug/L.23 Single oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter and es-
sentially independent of the sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 3.

                References

  1.  Fine,  D.H., Lieb,  D.,  and Rufeh, R.
"Principle of Operation of the Thermal  En-
ergy  Analyzer  for  the  Trace  Analysis of
Volatile  and  Non-volatile  N-nitroso  Com-
pounds," Journal of Chromatography, 107, 351
(1975).
  2.  Fine,  D.H., Hoffman,  F.,  Rounbehler,
D.P., and Belcher, N.M. "Analysis of N-nitro-
so Compounds by Combined High  Perform-
ance Liquid  Chromatography  and Thermal
Energy Analysis," Walker, E.A., Bogovski, P.
and  Griciute, L., Editors, N-nitroso  Com-
pounds—Analysis  and   Formation,  Lyon,
International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IARC Scientific Publications No. 14), pp. 43-
50 (1976).
  3. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  4.  "Determination of Nitrosamines in In-
dustrial  and Municipal  Wastewaters," EPA
600/4-82-016, National Technical Information
Service,  PB82-199621,  Springfield,  Virginia
22161, April 1982.
  5. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for  Preserva-
tion of Organic  Constituents," American So-
ciety for Testing and  Materials,  Philadel-
phia.
  6. Buglass, A.J., Challis,  B.C., and Osborn,
M.R.  "Transnitrosation  and Decomposition
of Nitrosamines," Bogovski, P. and Walker,
E.A., Editors, N-nitroso Compounds  in  the
Environment,  Lyon, International Agency
for Research  on  Cancer  (IARC  Scientific
Publication No. 9), pp. 94-100 (1974).
  7. Burgess, E.M., and Lavanish, J.M. "Pho-
tochemical     Decomposition      of    N-
nitrosamines," Tetrahedon Letters, 1221 (1964)
  8.   Druckrey,  H.,   Preussmann,   R.,
Ivankovic, S.,  and Schmahl, D. "Organotrope
Carcinogene Wirkungen bei 65 Verschiedenen
N-NitrosoVerbindungen  an BD-Ratten," Z.
Krebsforsch., 69, 103 (1967).
  9. Fiddler, W.  "The Occurrence and Deter-
mination of N-nitroso Compounds," Toxicol.
Appl. Pharmacol., 31, 352 (1975).
  10. "Carcinogens—Working With  Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education,  and
Welfare,  Public  Health Service, Center  for
Disease Control, National Institute  for Occu-
pational Safety  and  Health, Publication  No.
77-206, August  1977.
  11.  "OSHA Safety and  Health Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR Part 1910), Occu-
pational Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  12. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical  Society Publica-
tion,  Committee  on  Chemical Safety, 3rd
Edition, 1979.
  13.  Lijinsky,  W.  "How Nitrosamines Cause
Cancer," New Scientist,  73, 216 (1977).
  14.  Mirvish,  S.S.  "N-Nitroso compounds:
Their Chemical and in vivo Formation and
Possible Importance as Environmental Car-
cinogens," /. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 3, 1267
(1977).
  15. "Reconnaissance of Environmental Lev-
els of Nitrosamines in the  Central  United
States," EPA-330/1-77-001, National Enforce-
ment Investigations  Center,  U.S.  Environ-
mental Protection Agency (1977).
  16.  "Atmospheric Nitrosamine Assessment
Report," Office of  Air  Quality Planning and
Standards,  U.S. Environmental  Protection
Agency,  Research  Triangle  Park,   North
Carolina (1976).
  17.  "Scientific and Technical Assessment
Report  on  Nitrosamines,"  EPA-660/6-7-001,
Office of Research  and  Development, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (1976).
  18.  Provost, L.P.,  and  Elder, R.S. "Inter-
pretation of Percent Recovery Data," Amer-
ican Laboratory, 15,  58-63 (1983).  (The value
2.44 used in the equation in Section  8.3.3 is
two times the value of 1.22 derived in this re-
port.)
  19. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31,  D3370-76. "Standard Practices for Sam-
pling  Water," American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  20. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetric, DPD-FAS)
and   330.5  (Spectrophotometric,  DPD)  for
Chlorine,   Total  Residual,"   Methods  for
Chemical  Analysis  of Water and  Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020, U.S. Environmental  Pro-
tection  Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and  Support Laboratory, Cincinnati,  Ohio
45268, March 1979.
  21. Burke, J.  A.  "Gas Chromatography for
Pesticide Residue  Analysis; Some Practical
Aspects," Journal of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, 48,  1037 (1965).
  22.  "Method  Detection  Limit and Analyt-
ical Curve Studies EPA Methods 606, 607, and
608," Special letter report for EPA  Contract
68-03-2606,  U.S. Environmental  Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port  Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268,
June 1980.
  23.  "EPA  Method  Study 17 Method  607—
Nitrosamines,"   EPA   600/4-84-051,  National
Technical Information Service, PB84-207646,
Springfield, Virginia 22161, June 1984.
                                         117

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 607
40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
             TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Parameter
N-Nitrosodimethylamme . . 	
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamme ....
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine a 	
Retention time (mm)
Column 1
41
12 1
"128
Column 2
088
4.2
'64
Method de-
tection limit
WU
015
46
81
  Column 1 conditions. Chromosorb W-AW (80/100 mesh) coated with 10% Carbowax 20 M/2% KOH packed in a 1 8 m long x
4mm ID glass column with helium earner gas at 40 mL/min flow rate. Column temperature held isothermal at 110 °C, except
where otherwise indicated
  Column 2 conditions. Supelcoport (100/120  mesh) coated with 10% SP-2250 packed in a 1 8 m long x 4 mm ID glass column
with helium carrier gas at 40 mLAnm flow rate  Column temperature held isothermal at 120 °C, except where otherwise indicated
  a Measured as diphenylamme
  "220 °C column temperature
  C210 °C column temperature

                         TABLE 2—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 607
Parameter
N-Nitrosodimethylamme ....
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine . 	
Test cone
(ng/L)
20
20
20
Limit for s
(«>/L)
34
6 1
57
Range for X
(R9/L)
4.6-20 0
2 1-24 5
1 1 5-26 8
Range for
P, P> (per-
cent)
13-109
D-139
45-146
  s=Standard deviation for four recovery measurements, in u.g/L (Section 8.2 4)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in u.g/L (Section 824)
  P, P,=Percent recovery measured (Section 832, Section 842)
  D=Detected, result must be greater than zero
  NOTE. These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 3  Where necessary, the limits for recov-
ery have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3

  TABLE 3—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION  AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 607
Parameter
N-Nrtrosodimethylamme ... 	
N-Nrtrosodi-n-propylamme .. . 	
Accuracy, as
recovery, X'
(ng/L)
0 37C+0.06
0 64C+0 52
0.96C-0.07
Single analyst
precision, s/
(H9/L)
0.25X-004
036X-1 53
0.15X+0 13
Overall preci-
sion, S' (ng/L)
0 25X+0 1 1
046X-047
021X+015
  X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in uo/L
  s/=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in u.g/L.
  S'=Expected interlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ^g/L.
  C=True value for the concentration, in ug/L
  X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in (ig/L
                                                  118

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 607
     COLUMN: 10% CARBOWAX 20M / 2% KOH ON CHROMOSORB W-AW
     TEMPERATURE: 110°C
     DETECTOR: PHOSPHORUS/NITROGEN
         24   6   8  10  12  14

        RETENTION TIME, MIN.

     Figure 1. Gas chromatogram of nitrosamines.
                             119
    203-160 D-5

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 607
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    COLUMN: 10% CARBOWAX 20M/2% KOH ON CHROMOSORB W-AW
    TEMPERATURE: 220°C
    DETECTOR: PHOSPHORUS/NITROGEN
    0   2  4   6   8  10  12  14  16  18
             RETENTION TIME, MIN.

   Figure 2.  Gas chromatogram of IM-nitrosodiphenylamine
              as diphenylamine.
                             120

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 608
  METHOD 608—ORGANOCHLORINB PESTICIDES
                 AND PCBS

           1. Scope and Application

  1.1  This method covers the determination
of  certain  organochlorine  pesticides  and
PCBs. The following parameters can be de-
termined by this method:
Parameter
Aldrm
a-BHC
P-BHC
5-BHC
I^BHC
Chlordane
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT 	
Dieldnn
Endosulfan 1
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan sulfate
Eldrm
Endnn aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Toxaphene
PCB-1016
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
STOHET No
39330
39337
39338
34259
39340
39350
39310
39320
39300
39380
34361
34356
34351
39390
34366
39410
39420
39400
34671
39488
39492
39496
39500
39504
39508
CAS No
309-00-2
319-S4-6
319-85-7
319-86-8
58-89-9
57-74-9
72-54-8
72-55-9
50-29-3
60-57-1
959-98-8
33212-65-9
1031-07-8
72-20-8
7421-93-4
76-44-8
1024-57-3
8001-35-2
12674-11-2
1104-28-2
11141-16-5
53469-21-9
12672-29-6
11097-69-1
11096-82-5
  1.2  This is a gas  chromatographic  (GC)
method applicable  to the determination of
the compounds listed  above in municipal and
industrial  discharges as  provided  under 40
CFR 136.1.  When this  method is used to ana-
lyze unfamiliar samples for any or all of the
compounds above, compound identifications
should be  supported  by at least one addi-
tional qualitative  technique.  This method
describes analytical conditions for a second
gas chromatographic  column  that can  be
used  to confirm  measurements  made  with
the primary column. Method 625 provides gas
chromatograph/mass  spectrometer (GC/MS)
conditions  appropriate for the  qualitative
and quantitative confirmation  of results for
all of the parameters  listed above, using the
extract produced by this method.
  1.3  The  method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined  in Section 14.1)1 for each parameter is
listed in Table 1. The MDL  for a specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending upon the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.4  The  sample extraction and concentra-
tion steps in this method are essentially the
same  as in Methods  606,  609,  611, and  612.
Thus, a single sample may be extracted to
measure  the  parameters  included in  the
scope of each of these methods. When clean-
up is required, the concentration levels must
be high enough to permit selecting aliquots,
as necessary,  to  apply appropriate  cleanup
procedures. The analyst is allowed the lati-
tude,   under   Section   12,    to    select
chromatographic conditions  appropriate for
the simultaneous measurement of combina-
tions of these parameters.
  1.5  Any modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as a major modification subject to
application and approval of alternate test
procedures under 40 CPR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.6  This method is restricted to use by or
under the  supervision of analysts experi-
enced in the use of a gas chromatograph and
in the interpretation  of gas chromatograms.
Each analyst must demonstrate  the ability
to  generate acceptable results with this
method using the procedure described in Sec-
tion 8.2.

            2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A  measured  volume   of sample,  ap-
proximately 1-L, is  extracted with  meth-
ylene chloride using a separatory funnel. The
methylene chloride extract  is  dried and ex-
changed to hexane during concentration to a
volume of 10 mL or less. The extract is sepa-
rated by gas chromatography and the param-
eters are then measured with an electron
capture detector.2
  2.2  The method provides a Plorisil column
cleanup  procedure and an elemental  sulfur
removal procedure to aid in the elimination
of interferences that may be encountered.

              3. Interferences

  3.1  Method interferences  may be caused
by contaminants in solvents, reagents,  glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that  lead  to discrete artifacts and/or ele-
vated baselines in gas chromatograms.  All of
these  materials  must be  routinely  dem-
onstrated to be free from interferences  under
the conditions  of the  analysis by  running
laboratory reagent blanks  as  described  in
Section 813.
  3.1.1 Glassware   must  be  scrupulously
cleaned.3 Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
sible  after  use by rinsing with the last sol-
vent used in it. Solvent rinsing  should be fol-
lowed by detergent  washing with hot water,
and  rinses  with tap  water  and  distilled
water. The glassware should then be drained
dry, and heated in a muffle furnace at  400 °C
for 15 to 30 min. Some thermally stable ma-
terials, such as PCBs,  may not be eliminated
by this treatment. Solvent rinses with ace-
tone  and pesticide  quality  hexane  may be
substituted  for the muffle furnace heating.
Thorough rinsing with such solvents usually
eliminates   PCB  interference.  Volumetric
ware  should  not be heated in  a muffle fur-
nace.  After  drying and cooling, glassware
should be sealed and stored  in  a clean envi-
ronment to  prevent  any accumulation  of
dust or other contaminants. Store inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
                                         121

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 608
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  3.1.2 The use of high purity reagents and
solvents helps to minimize interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required.
  3.2  Interferences by phthalate esters can
pose a major problem in pesticide analysis
when using the electron capture  detector.
These  compounds generally appear in the
chromatogram as large  late eluting peaks,
especially in the 15 and  50% fractions from
Florisil.  Common flexible plastics contain
varying  amounts  of   phthalates.  These
phthalates are easily  extracted or leached
from such materials during laboratory oper-
ations. Cross  contamination of clean glass-
ware routinely occurs when plastics are han-
dled during extraction steps, especially when
solvent-wetted surfaces  are  handled. Inter-
ferences from phthalates can best  be  mini-
mized by avoiding the use of plastics in the
laboratory.  Exhaustive cleanup of  reagents
and glassware may be  required to eliminate
background phthalate contamination.4-5 The
interferences  from  phthalate esters can  be
avoided by using a mlcrocoulometric or elec-
trolytic conductivity detector.
  3.3  Matrix interferences may be caused  by
contaminants that are co-extracted  from the
sample. The extent of matrix interferences
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending upon the nature and diversity  of
the industrial complex or municipality being
sampled. The  cleanup procedures in Section
11 can be used to overcome many of these
interferences, but unique  samples  may re-
quire  additional  cleanup   approaches   to
achieve the MDL listed in Table 1.

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity  of
each reagent  used  in  this method has not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. From this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level  by whatever means
available. The laboratory is responsible for
maintaining  a  current  awareness file  of
OSHA regulations regarding  the safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data  handling
sheets should also be made available to all
personnel involved in  the chemical  analysis.
Additional references  to laboratory safety
are available and have been identified6-8 for
the information of the analyst.
  4.2  The  following parameters covered  by
this method have been tentatively classified
as known or suspected,  human or  mamma-
lian carcinogens:  4,4'-DDT,  4,4'-DDD, the
BHCs,  and the PCBs. Primary standards  of
these toxic compounds should be prepared in
a hood. A  NIOSH/MESA  approved toxic gas
respirator should be worn when the analyst
handles high  concentrations of these toxic
compounds.
         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling  equipment, for discrete  or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1  Grab  sample  bottle—1-L  or  1-qt,
amber glass,  fitted with  a screw cap lined
with Teflon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If amber
bottles  are not available,  protect samples
from light. The bottle and cap liner must be
washed, rinsed with  acetone  or methylene
chloride, and dried before use to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2  Automatic  sampler (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample con-
tainers  for the collection  of a minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4 °C and protected from
light during composting. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic  pump, a  minimum  length  of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may  be
used. Before use, however, the compressible
tubing  should  be  thoroughly  rinsed  with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize the potential for
contamination of the sample. An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2.  Glassware (All specifications are sug-
gested. Catalog numbers are included for  il-
lustration only.):
  5.2.1  Separatory  funnel—2-L, with Teflon
stopcock.
  5.2.2  Drying    column—Chromatographic
column, approximately 400 mm long x 19 mm
ID, with coarse frit filter disc.
  5.2.3  Chromatographic  column—400  mm
long x 22 mm ID, with Teflon stopcock and
coarse frit filter  disc  (Kontes  K-42054  or
equivalent).
  5.2.4  Concentrator   tube,   Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL, graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration must be checked
at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass stopper is used to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.5  Evaporative flask, Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL  (Kontes K-570001-0500 or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.6  Snyder   column,   Kuderna/Danish—
Three-ball  macro  (Kontes  K-503000-0121  or
equivalent).
  5.2.7  Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.3  Boiling   chips—Approximately   10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C for 30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water bath—Heated,  with concentric
ring cover, capable  of  temperature control
(±2 °C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5  Balance—Analytical, capable of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.6  Gas  chromatograph—An  analytical
system  complete with gas chromatograph
suitable for on-column  injection and all re-
quired accessories  including syringes,  ana-
lytical columns, gases, detector, and strip-
                                         122

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 608
chart  recorder.   A  data  system is  rec-
ommended for measuring peak areas.
  5.6.1 Column 1—1,8 m  long  x 4 mm ID
glass,  packed  with 1.5%  SP-2250/1.95%  SP-
2401 on Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) or equiva-
lent. This column was used  to  develop the
method performance statements in Section
14.  Guidelines  for the use of alternate col-
umn packings are provided in Section 12.1.
  5.6.2 Column 2—1.8 m  long  x 4 mm ID
glass,  packed with 3% OV-1 on  Supelcoport
(100/120 mesh) or equivalent.
  5.6.3 Detector—Electron capture detector.
This detector  has proven effective in the
analysis  of wastewaters for the parameters
listed in the scope (Section 1.1), and was used
to  develop  the method performance  state-
ments in Section 14. Guidelines for  the use of
alternate  detectors  are  provided in Section
12.1.

                6. Reagents

  6.1  Reagent  water—Reagent  water  is de-
fined as a water in which an interferent  is
not  observed at the MDL  of the parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Sodium  hydroxide  solution  (10 N)—
Dissolve 40 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 100 mL.
  6.3  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.4  Sulfuric  acid (1+1)—Slowly, add 50 mL
to H2SO4  (ACS, sp. gr. 1.84) to 50 mL of rea-
gent water.
  6.5  Acetone, hexane, isooctane, methylene
chloride—Pesticide quality or equivalent.
  6.6  Ethyl ether—Nanograde, redistilled  in
glass if necessary.
  6.6.1 Ethyl ether must be shown  to be free
of peroxides before it is used as indicated by
EM  Laboratories Quant test strips. (Avail-
able from Scientific Products Co., Cat. No.
P1126-8, and other suppliers.)
  6.6.2 Procedures  recommended   for  re-
moval of peroxides are provided with the test
strips. After cleanup, 20  mL of ethyl alcohol
preservative must be added to each liter  of
ether.
  6.7  Sodium  sulfate—(ACS) Granular, an-
hydrous.  Purify by heating at 400 °C for 4 h
in a shallow tray.
  6.8  Florisil—PR grade (60/100 mesh). Pur-
chase activated at 1250  °F and  store in the
dark in glass containers with ground glass
stoppers or foil-lined screw caps. Before  use,
activate each batch  at least 16 h at 130 °C  in
a foil-covered glass container and allow to
cool.
  6.9  Mercury—Triple distilled.
  6.10  Copper powder—Activated.
  6.11  Stock  standard  solutions  (1.00 ug/
HL)—Stock  standard solutions  can be  pre-
pared from  pure  standard  materials or pur-
chased as  certified solutions.
  6.111 Prepare stock standard solutions by
accurately weighing about 0.0100 g of pure
material.  Dissolve the material  in  isooctane
and dilute to volume in  a  10-mL volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity is  assayed to be  96%  or  greater, the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate the concentration of the stock stand-
ard. Commercially prepared  stock standards
can be used at any concentration if they are
certified by the manufacturer or by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.11.2  Transfer  the  stock standard  solu-
tions into Teflon-sealed  screw-cap bottles.
Store at 4 °C and protect from light. Stock
standard  solutions should  be checked fre-
quently for signs of degradation or evapo-
ration,  especially just prior  to preparing
calibration standards from them.
  6.11.3  Stock standard solutions must be
replaced after six months, or sooner if com-
parison with check  standards  indicates  a
problem.
  6.12  Quality control check sample con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration

  7.1  Establish  gas chromatographic  oper-
ating conditions equivalent to those given in
Table 1. The gas chromatographic  system
can be calibrated using  the external standard
technique (Section 7.2) or the internal stand-
ard technique (Section 7.3).
  7.2  External standard  calibration proce-
dure:
  7.2.1 Prepare  calibration  standards  at  a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each  parameter of interest  by  adding vol-
umes of one or more  stock standards to a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
isooctane.  One  of the external standards
should be at a concentration  near, but above,
the MDL (Table 1) and the other concentra-
tions should  correspond to the  expected
range of concentrations found in real  sam-
ples or  should define the working range of
the detector.
  7.2.2 Using injections of 2  to 5 |J.L, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against the mass injected. The re-
sults  can be used to prepare  a calibration
curve for each compound. Alternatively, if
the ratio of  response  to  amount  injected
(calibration factor)  is  a constant  over the
working range (<10% relative standard  devi-
ation, RSD), linearity through the origin can
be assumed and the average ratio or calibra-
tion factor can be used  in place of a calibra-
tion curve.
  7.3  Internal  standard calibration proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst  must
select one or more internal standards that
are similar in analytical behavior  to the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate  that  the  measurement of
the internal  standard  is  not  affected by
method  or matrix interferences. Because of
these limitations, no internal standard can
                                          123

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
be suggested that is applicable to all sam-
ples.
  7.3.1  Prepare  calibration standards at  a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each parameter of interest by adding vol-
umes of one or more stock standards  to  a
volumetric flask. To each calibration stand-
ard, add a known constant amount of one or
more internal standards,  and  dilute to vol-
ume with isooctane. One  of  the standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the  MDL  and  the  other  concentrations
should correspond to the expected range of
concentrations  found in  real  samples or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
  7.3.2  Using injections of 2 to 5 nL, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against concentration for each com-
pound  and internal  standard. Calculate re-
sponse factors (RF) for each compound using
Equation 1.
               RF =
                    (A.Xc.
                                Equation 1
where:
As=Response  for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration  of  the internal standard
  (Hg/L).
C,=Concentraton  of the  parameter  to  be
  measured (ng/L).
  If the RF value over the working range is
a constant (<10% RSD), the RF  can be as-
sumed to be invariant  and the average RF
can be used for calculations.  Alternatively,
the results can be used  to plot a  calibration
curve of response ratios, AS/A,B, vs. RF.
  7.4  The working calibration curve,  cali-
bration factor, or RF must be verified  on
each working day by the measurement of one
or more calibration  standards.  If  the re-
sponse for any  parameter  varies from the
predicted response  by more than ±15%, the
test must be repeated using a fresh calibra-
tion standard. Alternatively, a new calibra-
tion curve must be prepared  for that com-
pound.
  7.5  The cleanup  procedure  in  Section 11
utilizes  Florisil  column  chromatography.
Florisil from different  batches  or  sources
may vary in adsorptive capacity. To stand-
ardize the amount of Florisil which is used,
the use of lauric acid  value9 is suggested.
The referenced procedure determines the ad-
sorption  from hexane solution of  lauric acid
(mg) per g of Florisil. The amount of Florisil
to be used for each column is calculated by
dividing 110 by this ratio and multiplying by
20 g.
  7.6  Before  using any cleanup  procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date elution patterns and  the absence  of
interferences from the reagents.

             8. Quality Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of spiked samples  to evaluate and
document data quality. The  laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks  are compared with  established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes  indicate  atypical method  perform-
ance, a  quality control check standard must
be analyzed  to  confirm  that the measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1   The  analyst must make an initial,
one-time, demonstration  of the ability  to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2   In recognition  of advances  that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.4, 11.1, and 12.1) to improve the sepa-
rations  or lower the cost of measurements.
Each time such a modification is  made  to
the method, the  analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3   Before processing any samples, the
analyst  must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate  that interferences from the
analytical system and glassware are under
control.  Each time a set of samples is ex-
tracted  or reagents  are changed, a reagent
water blank must be  processed as a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4   The  laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, spike  and analyze  a minimum of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5  The  laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the analyses  of
quality  control check standards that the op-
eration  of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4.  The frequency  of the  check  standard
analyses is equivalent to 10% of all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from samples (Section  8.3) meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6   The  laboratory must maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To establish the  ability  to  generate
acceptable accuracy and  precision,  the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
                                         124

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
  8.2.1  A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing- each sin-
gle-component parameter of interest at the
following  concentrations  in acetone:  4,4'-
DDD,   10   ng/mL;   4,4'-DDT,   10   ng/mL;
endosulfan II,  10 ng/mL; endosulfan sulfate,
10 (ig/mL; endrin, 10 ug/mL; any other single-
component pesticide,  2 ^ig/mL. If this method
is only  to be  used  to analyze  for  PCBs,
chlordane, or toxaphene, the QC  check sam-
ple concentrate should contain the most rep-
resentative multicomponent parameter at a
concentration of 50 jig/mL in acetone. The QC
check sample concentrate must be obtained
from the  U.S. Environmental  Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port Laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio, if avail-
able. If not available from that  source, the
QC check  sample concentrate must be ob-
tained from another  external source.  If not
available from either source above, the QC
check sample concentrate must be prepared
by the laboratory using stock standards pre-
pared independently from those used for cali-
bration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet, prepare QC check sam-
ples at  the  test  concentrations shown in
Table 3 by adding 1.00 mL of QC  check sam-
ple concentrate to  each of four 1-L aliquots
of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze the  well-mixed  QC  check
samples according  to the method beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the  average recovery (X) in
jig/mL; and the standard deviation of the re-
covery  (s) in  ng/mL,  for  each  parameter
using- the four results.
  8.2.5  For each parameter compare s and X
with  the  corresponding  acceptance criteria
for  precision  and accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table  3.  If s and X for all param-
eters of interest meet the  acceptance  cri-
teria, the system performance is acceptable
and analysis  of actual samples can begin. If
any individual s exceeds the precision limit
or any  individual  X falls outside the range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter.
  NOTE: The  large number of parameters in
Table  3 present a substantial  probability
that one or more will fail at  least one of the
acceptance criteria when all parameters are
analyzed.
  8.2.6 When one or more of the  parameters
tested fail at least one of the acceptance cri-
teria, the analyst must proceed according to
Section 8.2.6.1 or 8.2.6.2.
  8.2.6.1  Locate and  correct the source of
the problem  and repeat  the  test for  all pa-
rameters of interest beginning with Section
8.2.2.
  8.2.6.2  Beginning with Section 8.2.2, repeat
the  test  only  for those  parameters  that
failed  to meet criteria.  Repeated  failure,
however,  will  confirm a  general problem
with the measurement system. If this occurs,
locate and correct the source of the problem
and repeat the test for all compmunds of in-
terest beginning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The  laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, spike at least 10%  of the samples from
each  sample site being monitored  to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing one to
ten samples per month,  at least one spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1 The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If, as  in  compliance  monitoring,
the concentration of  a specific parameter in
the sample  is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration  limit, the spike should
be at that  limit or 1  to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If  the concentration of a specific
parameter   in  the   sample  is  not  being
checked  against a limit  specific to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at the test con-
centration  in Section 8.2.2 or 1  to 5  times
higher than the background concentration
determined in  Section 8.3.2, whichever con-
centration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If  it  is impractical to determine
background levels before  spiking (e.g., max-
imum holding  times  will  be exceeded), the
spike concentration should be (1) the regu-
latory concentration limit, if any; or, if none
(2) the larger of  either 5 times higher  than
the expected  background concentration  or
the test concentration in Section 8.2.2.
  8.3.2 Analyze one sample aliquot to deter-
mine  the background concentration (B) of
each parameter. If necessary, prepare a new
QC  check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate for the background  concentra-
tions  in  the sample.  Spike a second sample
aliquot with 1.0 mL of the QC check sample
concentrate and analyze  it to determine the
concentration after spiking  (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100(A-B)%/T, where T  is the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3 Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with the  corresponding QC
acceptance  criteria found  in Table 3. These
acceptance  criteria were  calculated to in-
clude an allowance for error in measurement
of both the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will  be accounted for to the
extent that the analyst's spike to back-
ground ratio approaches 5:1.10 If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than the
test concentration in Section 8.2.2, the ana-
lyst must use either  the QC acceptance cri-
teria in Table 3,  or optional QC  acceptance
criteria calculated for the specific spike con-
centration. To calculate optional acceptance
criteria for  the recovery of a parameter:  (1)
Calculate accuracy (X') using the equation in
Table 4, substituting the spike concentration
(T)  for C; (2) calculate overall precision (S')
using the equation in  Table 4, substituting X'
                                         125

-------
Pt.  136, App. A.Meth. 608
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
for X; (3) calculate the range for recovery at
the spike concentration as (100 X7T)±2.44(100
  8.3.4 If any individual P falls outside the
designated range for recovery, that param-
eter has  failed the acceptance criteria. A
check standard containing  each parameter
that failed the criteria must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
criteria for recovery  in Section  8.3,  a QC
check standard containing  each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the number of parameters  being simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance of the labora-
tory. If the entire list of parameters in Table
3 must be measured in the sample in Section
8.3, the probability that the  analysis of a QC
check standard will be required is high. In
this case  the  QC check standard  should be
routinely analyzed with the spike sample.
  8.4.1 Prepare the QC check standard  by
adding  1.0  mL of  QC check sample  con-
centrate (Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L  of rea-
gent  water. The QC check  standard needs
only to contain the parameters that failed
criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2 Analyze the QC check standards to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3 Compare the percent recovery (Ps)
for each parameter  with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 3. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared with these criteria. If
the recovery of any  such parameter falls out-
side the  designated range,   the laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control, and the problem must tie
immediately identified and  corrected.  The
analytical result for that parameter  in the
unspiked  sample is suspect  and may  not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,  method accuracy  for wastewater
samples must be assessed and records must
be  maintained. After the analysis  of five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate  the  average percent recovery (P)
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent recovery interval from P-2 sp to
P+2 sp. If P=90% and sp=10%,  for example, the
accuracy  interval is expressed as 70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on a regular  basis  (e.g. after  each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6  It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this method. The specific prac-
tices  that are most  productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates may be  ana-
lyzed to assess the precision of the environ-
mental  measurements. When doubt  exists
over the identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas chromatography  with a dissimilar col-
umn, specific  element  detector, or  mass
spectrometer must be used. Whenever pos-
sible, the laboratory should analyze standard
reference  materials and participate in rel-
evant performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  Grab  samples  must  be  collected  in
glass containers.  Conventional  sampling
practices11 should be followed, except  that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with sample
before collection. Composite samples should
be collected in refrigerated  glass containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program.  Automatic  sampling  equipment
must be as free as possible  of Tygon tubing
and  other potential sources of contamina-
tion.
  9.2  All  samples must be  iced  or refrig-
erated at 4  °C from the time of collection
until extraction.  If the samples will not  be
extracted within 72 h  of collection, the sam-
ple should be adjusted to a pH range of 5.0 to
9.0 with  sodium hydroxide  solution or sul-
faric acid. Record the volume of acid or base
used. If aldrin  is to be determined, add so-
dium thiosulfate  when residual chlorine is
present. EPA Methods 330.4 and 330.5 may be
used for measurement of residual chlorine.12
Field test kits are available  for this purpose.
  9.3  All samples must be extracted within 7
days of collection and completely analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.2

           10. Sample Extraction

  10.1 Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the sample bottle for later determination
of sample volume. Pour the entire sample
into a 2-L separatory funnel.
  10.2 Add 60 mL of  methylene chloride  to
the sample bottle, seal, and shake 30  s  to
rinse the inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to the separatory funnel  and extract the
sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min.  with
periodic venting to release  excess pressure.
Allow the organic layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum  of 10  min. If the
emulsion interface between  layers is  more
than  one-third the volume  of the solvent
layer, the analyst must  employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation.
The optium technique depends upon the sam-
ple,  but may  include  stirring, filtration of
the emulsion through glass wool,  centrifuga-
tion, or other physical methods. Collect the
methylene chloride extract  in a 250-mL Er-
lenmeyer flask.
                                         126

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A.Mefh. 608
  10.3  Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
ylene chloride  to the sample bottle and re-
peat the extraction procedure a second time,
combining the extracts in the Erlenmeyer
flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
manner.
  10.4  Assemble  a  Kuderna-Danish  (K-D)
concentrator by attaching a  10-mL concen-
trator tube to a 500-mL evaporative flask.
Other  concentration  devices  or  techniques
may be  used  in place  of the K-D concen-
trator if the requirements of  Section 8.2 are
met.
  10.5  Pour the combined extract through a
solvent-rinsed  drying  column  containing
about  10  cm of anhydrous sodium sulfate,
and collect the extract in the K-D concen-
trator. Rinse the Erlenmeyer flask and col-
umn with 20 to 30 mL of methylene chloride
to complete the quantitative transfer.
  10.6  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
the evaporative flask and attach a three-ball
Snyder column. Prewet  the  Snyder column
by adding about 1 mL of methylene chloride
to the top. Place the K-D apparatus on a hot
water bath (60  to 65 °C) so that the concen-
trator tube is partially  immersed in the hot
water, and the entire lower rounded surface
of the flask is bathed with hot vapor. Adjust
the vertical position of the  apparatus and
the water temperature  as required to com-
plete  the concentration in 15 to 20 min. At
the proper rate of distillation the balls of the
column will actively chatter  but the  cham-
bers will not flood with condensed solvent.
When the apparent  volume of liquid reaches
1 mL, remove the K-D apparatus and allow it
to drain and cool for at least 10 min.
  10.7  Increase the temperature  of the  hot
water bath to about 80 °C. Momeltarily re-
move  the  Snyder  column,  add  50  mL  of
hexane and a new boiling chip, and reattach
the Snyder column. Concentrate the extract
as in  Section  10.6, except  use  hexane  to
prewet the column.  The elapsed time  of con-
centration should be 5 to 10 min.
  10.8  Remove the Snyder column and rinse
the flask and its lower joint into the concen-
trator tube with 1 to 2 mL of hexane. A 5-mL
syringe is recommended for  this operation.
Stopper the concentrator tube and store re-
frigerated if further processing will  not be
performed immediately.  If the extract will
be stored longer than two days, it should be
transferred to a Teflon-sealed screw-cap vial.
If the sample  extract  requires no further
cleanup, proceed with gas chromatographic
analysis (Section 12). If the sample requires
further cleanup, proceed to Section 11.
  10.9  Determine the  original sample vol-
ume by  refilling the sample bottle  to  the
mark and transferring the liquid  to  a 1000-
mL graduated  cylinder.  Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5 mL.
         11. Cleanup and Separation
  11.1  Cleanup procedures may not be nec-
essary for a relatively clean sample matrix.
If particular circumstances demand the use
of a cleanup procedure, the analyst may use
either procedure  below or any other appro-
priate procedure. However,  the analyst first
must demonstrate that the requirements of
Section 8.2 can be met using the method as
revised to incorporate  the cleanup proce-
dure. The Plorisil column allows for a select
fractionation  of  the  compounds and will
eliminate polar interferences. Elemental sul-
fur,  which interferes with the  electron cap-
ture  gas chromatography  of  certain  pes-
ticides, can be removed by the technique de-
scribed in Section 11.3.
  11.2  Florisil column cleanup:
  11.2.1 Place a  weight  of Florisil  (nomi-
nally  20  g)  predetermined by  calibration
(Section  7.5),  into  a chromatographic col-
umn. Tap the column  to settle the Florisil
and  add 1 to 2 cm of anhydrous sodium sul-
fate to the top.
  11.2.2 Add 60  mL of  hexane to wet and
rinse the sodium sulfate and Florisil.  Just
prior to exposure  of the sodium sulfate layer
to the air, stop the elution  of the hexane by
closing the stopcock on the chromatographic
column. Discard the eluate.
  11.2.3 Adjust the  sample  extract volume
to 10 mL with hexane  and transfer it  from
the K-D concentrator tube onto the column.
Rinse  the  tube   twice  with 1  to 2  mL  of
hexane, adding each rinse to the column.
  11.2.4 Place a 500-mL K-D flask and clean
concentrator  tube   under  the  chroma-
tographic column. Drain the column into the
flask until the sodium sulfate layer is nearly
exposed. Elute the column with 200 mL of 6%
ethyl ether in hexane (V/V) (Fraction 1) at a
rate of about 5  mL/min. Remove  the K-D
flask and set it aside for later concentration.
Elute the column again, using 200 mL of 15%
ethyl ether in hexane (V/V) (Fraction 2), into
a  second  K-D  flask.  Perform  the  third
elution using 200 mL of 50% ethyl ether in
hexane (V/V) (Fraction 3). The elution pat-
terns for the pesticides and PCBs are shown
in Table 2.
  11.2.5 Concentrate the fractions as in Sec-
tion 10.6, except  use hexane to prewet the
column and set the  water bath at about 85
°C. When the apparatus is cool, remove the
Snyder column and  rinse the flask and its
lower joint into the concentrator tube  with
hexane. Adjust the volume  of each fraction
to 10 mL with hexane and  analyze by gas
chromatography (Section 12).
  11.3  Elemental sulfur will usually elute
entirely in Fraction  1 of the Florisil column
cleanup. To remove sulfur interference from
this  fraction or the original extract, pipet
1.00  mL of the concentrated extract into  a
clean  concentrator  tube  or Teflon-sealed
vial. Add one to three  drops of mercury and
                                         127

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 608
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
seal.13 Agitate the contents of the vial for 15
to 30 s. Prolonged shaking (2 h) may be re-
quired. If so, this may be accomplished with
a reciprocal shaker. Alternatively, activated
copper powder may be used for sulfur re-
moval.14 Analyze by gas chromatography.

          12. Gas Chromatography

  12.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions  for   the  gas chro-
matograph. Included in this table are reten-
tion times and MDL that can be achieved
under these conditions. Examples of the sep-
arations achieved by Column 1 are shown in
Figures 1 to 10. Other packed or capillary
(open-tubular)  columns,   chromatographic
conditions, or detectors may be used if the
requirements of Section 8.2 are met.
  12.2  Calibrate  the  system  daily  as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12.3  If the  internal standard calibration
procedure is  being used, the internal stand-
ard must be added to the sample extract and
mixed thoroughly  immediately before injec-
tion into the gas chromatograph.
  12.4  Inject 2 to 5 |iL of the sample extract
or  standard  into  the  gas chromatograph
using the solvent-flush technique.15 Smaller
(1.0  uL)  volumes may be injected if auto-
matic devices are employed. Record the vol-
ume injected to the nearest 0.05 (iL, the total
extract volume,  and the resulting peak size
in area or peak height units.
  12.5  Identify the parameters in the sample
by  comparing the retention  times of  the
peaks  in the sample chromatogram with
those   of    the   peaks    in   standard
chromatograms. The width of the retention
time window  used to  make  identifications
should be based upon  measurements of ac-
tual retention time variations of standards
over the course of a day.  Three times  the
standard deviation ol a retention time for a
compound can be  used to  calculate a  sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the  analyst should  weigh heavily in  the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  12.6  If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range of the system, dilute the ex-
tract and reanalyze.
  12.7  If the measurement of the peak re-
sponse is prevented by the presence of inter-
ferences, further cleanup is required.

              13. Calculations

  13.1  Determine the concentration  of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  13.1.1  If the external standard calibration
procedure is  used, calculate the  amount of
material injected  from the  peak response
using the calibration  curve  or calibration
factor determined in Section 7.2.2. The  con-
centration  in the  sample can be calculated
from Equation 2.
    Concentration (M-g/L) =
                            (A)(Vt)
                               Equation 2
where:
A=Amount of material injected (ng).
V,=Volume of extract injected (|iL).
V,=Volume of total extract QjL).
Vs=Volume of water extracted (mL).
  13.1.2  If the internal standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion in the sample using  the response factor
(RF) determined in Section 7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.


 Concentration (Lig/L) = .    ,     '—r
                         (Ais)(RF)(V0)

                               Equation 3

where:
A^Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
Als=Response for the internal standard.
Is=Amount of internal  standard  added to
  each extract (ng).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2 When it is apparent that two or more
PCB  (Aroclor) mixtures are  present, the
Webb and McCall procedure16 may be used to
identify and quantify the Aroclors.
  13.3 For    multicomponent    mixtures
(chlordane, toxaphene, and PCBs) match re-
tention times of peaks in the standards with
peaks in the sample. Quantitate every iden-
tifiable  peak unless interference  with indi-
vidual peaks persist after cleanup.  Add peak
height or peak area of each identified peak
in the chromatogram. Calculate as total re-
sponse in the sample versus total response in
the standard.
  13.4 Report results in ng/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC  data obtained
should be reported with the sample  results.

           14. Method Performance

  14.1 The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.1 The MDL concentrations  listed in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.17
Similar  results  were  achieved using  rep-
resentative wastewaters. The MDL actually
achieved in a given analysis  will vary de-
pending on instrument sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2 This method has been tested  for lin-
earity of spike recovery  from reagent water
and has been demonstrated to be applicable
over the concentration range from 4xMDL to
lOOOxMDL  with  the  following  exceptions:
Chlordane recovery at 4xMDL was low (60%);
                                         128

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A,  Meth. 60S
Toxaphene recovery was demonstrated linear
over the range of lOxMDL to lOOOxMDL.17
  14.3  This method was tested by 20 labora-
tories  using reagent  water, drinking  water,
surface   water,    and   three   industrial
wastewaters spiked at  six concentrations.18
Concentrations  used in  the study  ranged
from 0.5 to 30 ng/L for single-component pes-
ticides  and from 8.5  to 400  jig/L for  multi-
component parameters. Single operator pre-
cision,  overall  precision, and method accu-
racy were found to  be directly related to the
concentration of the parameter and  essen-
tially  independent of  the sample matrix.
Linear  equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented  in Table 4.

               REFERENCES

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2.  "Determination of  Pesticides and PCBs
in Industrial  and  Municipal Wastewaters,"
EPA 600/4-82-023, National Technical  Infor-
mation  Service,  PB82-214222,  Springfield,
Virginia 22161, April 1982.
  3. ASTM Annual  Book of Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constituents," American So-
ciety for Testing and  Materials,  Philadel-
phia.
  4.  Giam, C.S., Chan,  H.S., and Nef, G.S.,
"Sensitive   Method  for  Determination of
Phthalate Ester Plasticizers in Open-Ocean
Biota Samples," Analytical  Chemistry, 47, 2225
(1975).
  5.  Giam,  C.S.,  Chan,  H.S.  "Control of
Blanks in the Analysis of  Phthalates  in Air
and Ocean Biota Samples," U.S. National Bu-
reau of Standards,  Special Publication 442,
pp. 701-708, 1976.
  6.  "Carcinogens—Working  With  Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Public Health  Service, Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  7.  "OSHA Safety and Health Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR part 1910), Occu-
pational Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  8. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion, Committee on  Chemical Safety, 3rd
Edition, 1979.
  9. Mills, P.A. "Variation of Florisil Activ-
ity: Simple Method for Measuring Absorbent
Capacity  and Its  Use  in  Standardizing
Florisil Columns," Journal of the Association
of Official Analytical Chemists, 51, 29, (1968).
  10. Provost, L.P., and Elder,  R.S. "Inter-
pretation of Percent  Recovery Data," Amer-
ican Laboratory, 15, 58-63 (1983). (The value
2.44 used in the equation in Section 8.3.3 is
two times the value  1.22  derived in this re-
port.)
  11. ASTM Annual Book  of Standards, Part
31,  D3370-76.  "Standard Practices  for Sam-
pling Water,"  American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  12. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetric, DPD-FAS)
and  330.5  (Spectrophotometric,  DPD)   for
Chlorine,  Total   Residual,"  Methods   for
Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020,  U.S.  Environmental  Pro-
tection Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and  Support  Laboratory, Cincinnati,  Ohio
45268, March 1979.
  13. Goerlitz, D.F., and Law, L.M. Bulletin
for  Environmental Contamination  and  Toxi-
cology, 6, 9 (1971).
  14. "Manual  of Analytical Methods for the
Analysis of Pesticides in Human  and Envi-
ronmental  Samples,"  EPA-600/8-80-038, U.S.
Environmental Protection  Agency,  Health
Effects Research  Laboratory, Research  Tri-
angle Park, North Carolina.
  15. Burke, J.A. "Gas Chromatography  for
Pesticide Residue Analysis; Some  Practical
Aspects," Journal  of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, 48, 1037 (1965).
  16. Webb, R G ,  and McCall. A.C. "Quan-
titative PCB  Standards for Election Capture
Gas     Chromatography,"    Journal    of
Chromatographic Science, 11, 366 (1973).
  17. "Method Detection Limit  and Analyt-
ical  Curve Studies,  EPA Methods  606,  607,
and 608," Special letter report for EPA Con-
tract  68-03-2606, U.S.  Environmental Protec-
tion Agency,  Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati, Ohio 45268,
June 1980.
  18. "EPA Method Study 18 Method  608—
Organochlorine Pesticides and  PCBs,"  EPA
600/4-84-061, National  Technical Information
Service, PB84-211358,  Springfield,  Virginia
22161, June 1984.
           TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Parameter
a-BHC 	
f-BHC
P-BHC
Heptachlor
8-BHC
Aldrm
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan I ...
Retention time (mm)
Col 1
1 35
1 70
1 90
200
215
240
350
450
Col 2
1 82
213
1 97
335
220
410
500
620
Method detec-
tion limit
(H9/L)
0003
0004
0006
0003
0009
0004
0083
0014
                                          129

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
      TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS—Continued
Parameter
4 4'-DDE

Endnn
4 4'-DDD 	 	

4 4'-DDT 	


Chlordane 	 .. 	
Toxaphene 	 . 	
PCB-1016 	
PCB-1221 	 . . 	
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248 	 . . 	
PCB-1254
PCB-1260 	 .... 	 	
Retention time (mm)
Col. 1
513
545
655
783
800
940
11 82
1422
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
Col 2
7.15
7.23
8.10
9.08
8.28
11.75
9.30
10.70
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
Method detec-
tion limit
(H9/L)
0.004
0.002
0006
0.011
0.004
0012
0023
0.066
0.014
024
nd
nd
nd
0065
nd
nd
nd
  AColumn 1 conditions: Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) coated with 1 5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 packed in a 1.8 m long x 4
mm ID glass column with 5% methane/95% argon carrier gas at 60 ml/mm (low rate. Column temperature held isothermal at
200 °C, except for PCB-1016 through PCB-1248, should be measured at 160 °C
  AColumn 2 conditions: Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) coated with 3% OV-1 packed in a 1.8 m long x 4 mm ID glass column
with 5% methane/95% argon carrier gas at 60 mL/mm flow rate Column temperature held isothermal at 200 °C for the pes-
ticides, at 140 °C for PCB-1221 and 1232, and at 170 °C for PCB-1016 and 1242 to 1268
  Amr=Multiple peak response See Figures 2 thru 10
  And=Not determined


      TABLE 2—DISTRIBUTION OF CHLORINATED PESTICIDES  AND PCBs INTO FLORISIL COLUMN
                                          FRACTIONS 2

Aldrin . . . . 	 ....
a-BHC . . . 	
3-BHC ... 	
5-BHC . . . 	
Y-BHC 	 	
Chlordane 	 	
4 4'-DDO 	 	
44' DDE
44'-DDT 	 	
Dieldrm 	 	
Endosulfan I 	 	 ...


Endrin 	 . ... 	 	
Endnn aldehyde . ... 	
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide 	 	 ....
Toxaphene . 	 	
PCB-1016 .... 	 	 	
PCB-1221
PCB-1232 ... ... 	
PCB-1242 	 	
PCB-1248 	 	
PCB-1254
PCB-1260 	 	 	
1
100
100
97
98
100
100
99
98
100
0
37
0
0
4
0
100
100
96
97
97
95
97
103
90
95
2






100
64
7
0
96
68

4


3







91
106
26




                                                                      Percent recovery by fraction a
  8 Eluant composition1
     Fraction 1-£% ethyl ether in hexane
     Fraction 2-15% ethyl ether in hexane
     Fraction 3-50% ethyl ether in hexane
                       TABLE 3—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 608
Parameter
Aldnn ... ....
a-BHC 	 	
Test cone
(U9/L)
20
2.0
Limit for s
(H9/L)
042
048
Range for
X(H9/L)
1 08-2.24
0 98-2.44
Range for
P, Pb(%)
42-122
37-134
                                               130

-------
Environmental Protection Agency                          Pt.  136,  App. A, Meth. 608

                  TABLE 3—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 608—Continued
Parameter
P-BHC
5-BHC
1-BHC
Chlordane
4,4 '-ODD
4,4 '-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dieldrm
Endosulfan 1
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate .
Endrm
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide ...
Toxaphene
PCB-1016
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248 ....
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
Test cone
(ug/L)
20
20
20
50
10
20
10
20
20
10
10
10
20
20
500
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Limit for s
(H9/L)
064
072
046
100
28
055
36
076
049
61
27
37
040
041
127
100
244
179
122
159
138
104
Range for
X (,ig/L)
0 78-2.60
1 01-2 37
0 86-2 32
27 6-54 3
4.8-126
1 08-2 60
4.6-137
1 15-249
1 14-282
22-171
38-132
51-126
0 86-2 00
1 13-263
27 8-55 6
30 5-51 5
22 1-75.2
140-985
24 8-69 6
29 0-70 2
22 2-57 9
187-549
Range for
P, P,(%)
17-147
19-140
38-127
45-119
31-141
30-145
25-160
36-146
45-153
D-202
26-144
30-147
34-1 1 1
37-142
41-126
50-114
15-178
10-215
39-150
38-158
29-131
8-127
  s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in ug/L (Section 824)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 824)
  P, P,=Percent recovery measured (Section 832, Section 842)
  D=Detected, result must be greater than zero
  NOTE These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 4 Where necessary, the limits for recov-
ery have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 4

  TABLE  4—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 608
Parameter
Aldnn
a-BHC
P-BHC
5-BHC
t-BHC
Chlordane
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dieldrm
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrm
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Toxaphene
PCB-1016
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248
PCB-1254 . ..
PCB-1260
Accuracy, as recov-
ery, X' (ng/L)
081C+004
0 84C+0 03
081C+007
081C+007
082C-005
082C-004
0 84C+0 30
085C+014
093C-013
0 90C4-0 02
0 97C4-0 04
0 93C+0 34
0.89C-037
089C-004
0 69C+0 04
089C+010
0 80C+1 74
081C+050
0 96C+0 65
091C+1079
0 93C+0 70
0 97C+1 06
0 76C+2 07
0 66C+3 76
Single analyst pre-
cision, s,' (ng/L)
016X-004
0 13X4-004
022X-002
018X+009
012X4-006
0 13X4-013
020X-018
013X4-006
017X4-039
0 12X4-0 19
0 10X4-007
041X— 065
013X4-033
0 20X4-0 25
006X4-0 13
018X-0 11
0 09X+3 20
0 13X4-0 15
029X-076
021X-1 93
011X4-1 40
0 17X4-041
0 15X4-1 66
022X-237
Overall precision,
S' (ug/L)
020X-001
023X-000
033X-005
0 25X+0 03
0 22X+0 04
018X+018
027X-014
028X-009
031X-021
016X+016
018X+008
047X-020
0 24X+0 35
0 24X+0 25
016X+008
025X-008
0 20X+0 22
015X4-045
035X-062
031X4.350
021X4-1 52
025X-037
017X4-362
039X-486
  X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in ncj/L
  s/=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in jig/L
  S'=Expected mterlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in \ig/L
  C=True value for the concentration, in jig/L
  X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in ^g/L
                                                131

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
       COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
       TEMPERATURE: 200'C.
       DETECTOR: ELECTRON CAPTURE
           X
           O
           0.
        "
         U
               Q
               Q
                     O
                     Q
   O
   Q
                              CO
uu
    0       48      12      16
             RETENTION TIME, MIN.

    Figure 1. Gas chromatogram of pesticides.
                        132

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
         COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401  ON SUPELCOPORT
         TEMPERATURE:  200°C.
         DETECTOR:  ELECTRON CAPTURE
    04        8        12       16
             RETENTION TIME, MIN.

    Figure 2. Gas chromatogram of chlordane.
                            133

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                         COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401
                         ON SUPELCOPORT
                        TEMPERATURE: 200°C.
                        DETECTOR: ELECTRON CAPTURE
                    10      14      18      22      26
                     RETENTION TIME, MIN.
  Figure 3.  Gas chromatogram of toxaphene.
                            134

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
       COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
       TEMPERATURE:  160°C.
       DETECTOR:  ELECTRON CAPTURE
                 6       10      14
                 RETENTION TIME, MIN.
 18
22
     Figure 4.  Gas chromatogram of PCB-1016.
                            135

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
        COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
        TEMPERATURE:  160'C.
        DETECTOR:  ELECTRON CAPTURE
         2       6       10      14      18      22
                   RETENTION TIME, MIN.

      Figure 5. Gas chromatogram of PCB-1221.
                            136

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
     COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
     TEMPERATURE: 160°C.
     DETECTOR: ELECTRON CAPTURE
     2        6       10       14        18
                   RETENTION TIME, MIN.

 Figure 6.  Gas chromatogram of PCB-1232.
        22
24
                             137

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
     COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
     TEMPERATURE: 160°C.
     DETECTOR: ELECTRON CAPTURE
     2        6       10       14      18
                  RETENTION TIME, MIN.

  Figure 7. Gas chromatogram of PCB-1242.
           22
                            138

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A.Meth. 608
      COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
      TEMPERATURE: 160°C.
      DETECTOR:  ELECTRON  CAPTURE
     2        6       10      14      18

                     RETENTION TIME, MIN.

 Figure 8.  Gas chromatogram of PCB-1248.
     22
26
                            139

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 608
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
        COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
        TEMPERATURE: 2008C.
        DETECTOR: ELECTRON CAPTURE
                  6        10       14

                  RETENTION TIME, MIN.
       18
22
    Figure 9. Gas chromatogram of PCB-1254.
                             140

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
           Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 609
      COLUMN: 1.5% SP-2250/1.95% SP-2401 ON SUPELCOPORT
      TEMPERATURE:  200°C.
      DETECTOR:  ELECTRON CAPTURE
                       10       14        18
                     RETENTION TIME, MIN.
              22
26
 Figure  10.  Gas chromatogram of PCB-1260.
    METHOD 609—NITROAROMATICS AND
            ISOPHORONE

        1. Scope and Application

  1.1  This method covers the determination
of certain nitroaromatics and isophorone.
The following parameters  may be  deter-
mined by this method:
Parameter
2,4-Dmitrotoluene .

Nitrobenzene .
STORE!
No
34611
34626
34408
34447
CAS No
121-14-2
606-20-2
78-59-1
98-95-3
 1.2 This is a gas chromatographic  (GC)
method applicable to the determination of
                                 141

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 609
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
the compounds listed above in municipal and
industrial discharges as provided  under 40
CFR 136.1. When this method is used to ana-
lyze unfamiliar samples for any or all of the
compounds above, compound identifications
should be supported by at least one addi-
tional qualitative  technique. This method
describes analytical conditions for a second
gas chromatographic  column  that can  be
used  to confirm measurements  made  with
the primary column. Method 625 provides gas
chromatograph/mass  spectrometer (GC/MS)
conditions  appropriate for  the  qualitative
and quantitative confirmation of results for
all of the parameters listed above, using the
extract produced by this method.
  1.3  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined  in Section 14.1)1 for each parameter is
listed  in Table 1. The MDL  for a specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending upon the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix
  1.4  The sample extraction and concentra-
tion steps in this method are essentially the
same  as in  Methods 606, 608,  611, and  612.
Thus,  a single sample may be extracted to
measure  the  parameters  included in  the
scope of each of these methods. When clean-
up is required, the concentration  levels must
be high enough to permit selecting aliquots,
as necessary, to apply appropriate cleanup
procedures. The analyst is allowed the lati-
tude,    under   Section   12,    to   select
chromatographic conditions appropriate for
the simultaneous measurement of  combina-
tions  of these parameters.
  1.5  Any modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as a major  modification subject to
application  and approval of alternate test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.6  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the  supervision  of analysts experi-
enced in the use of a gas chromatograph and
in the interpretation of gas chromatograms.
Each  analyst must demonstrate  the ability
to  generate   acceptable  results  with  this
method using the procedure described in Sec-
tion 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A measured  volume  of sample,  ap-
proximately  1-L,  is extracted with meth-
ylene chloride using  a separatory  funnel. The
methylene chloride extract is dried and ex-
changed to hexane during concentration to a
volume of 10 mL  or  less.  Isophorone  and
nitrobenzene are measured by flame ioniza-
tion detector gas chromatography  (FIDGC).
The dinitrotoluenes are measured by elec-
tron capture  detector gas chromatography
(ECDGC).2
  2.2  The method provides a Florisil column
cleanup procedure to aid in the elimination
of interferences that may be encountered.
              3. Interferences
  3.1  Method interferences may be  caused
by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that lead to  discrete artifacts and/or  ele-
vated baseliles in gas chromatograms. All of
these  materials must be  routinely dem-
onstrated to be free from interferences under
the conditions  of the analysis by running
laboratory reagent blanks  as described in
Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1   Glassware   must   be   scrupulously
cleaned.3 Clean all glassware as soon  as pos-
sible after use by  rinsing with the last  sol-
vent used in it. Solvent rinsing should be fol-
lowed by detergent washing with hot water,
and  rinses  with  tap water  and  distilled
water. The glassware  should then be drained
dry, and heated  in a muffle furnace at 400 °C
for 15 to 30 min. Some thermally stable ma-
terials, such as PCBs, may not be eliminated
by this treatment.  Solvent rinses with ace-
tone and  pesticide quality hexane may be
substituted for  the muffle furnace heating.
Thorough rinsing with such solvents usually
eliminates  PCB interference.  Volumetric
ware should not be heated  in a muffle  fur-
nace.  After  drying and cooling,  glassware
should be sealed and  stored in a clean envi-
ronment to  prevent  any  accumulation of
dust or other contaminants. Store inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2   The  use  of high purity reagents  and
solvents helps to minimize interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents  by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required.
  3.2  Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are co-extracted from the
sample. The  extent of matrix interferences
will vary considerably from source to  source,
depending upon  the nature  and diversity of
the industrial complex or municipality being
sampled. The cleanup procedure  in Section
11 can be used  to overcome many of these
interferences,  but unique samples may re-
quire   additional  cleanup  approaches   to
achieve the MDL listed in Table 1.

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity   or  carcinogenicity  of
each reagent  used  in this method has  not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. From this  viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The laboratory is responsible for
maintaining  a  current  awareness  file  of
OSHA  regulations regarding  the  safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made available to all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional references to  laboratory safety
are available and have been identified4"6 for
the information  of the analyst.
                                         142

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 609
          5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling equipment, for discrete or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1  Grab  sample  bottle—1-L  or  1-qt,
amber glass,  fitted with a screw cap  lined
with Tenon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If amber
bottles  are not  available,  protect  samples
from  light. The bottle and cap liner must be
washed,  rinsed with acetone  or  methylene
chloride,  and dried before  use to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2  Automatic sampler (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample con-
tainers  for  the collection of a minimum of
250 mL of sample.  Sample containers must be
kept  refrigerated  at 4°C and protected from
light  during compositing. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic  pump,  a  minimum length of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may be
used.  Before use,  however,  the compressible
tubing  should be thoroughly rinsed  with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to  minimize  the potential for
contamination of the sample. An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All specifications  are sug-
gested.  Catalog numbers are included for il-
lustration only.):
  5.2.1  Separatory funnel—2-L, with Teflon
stopcock.
  5.2.2  Drying    column—Chromatographic
column, approximately 400 mm long x 19 mm
ID, with coarse frit filter disc.
  5.2.3  Chromatographic  column—100  mm
long x 10 mm ID, with Teflon stopcock.
  5.2.4  Concentrator  tube,   Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL,  graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration must be  checked
at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass  stopper is used to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.5 Evaporative flask, Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL (Kontes K-570001-0500 or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.6  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Three-ball macro  (Kontes  K-503000-0121  or
equivalent).
  5.2.7  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Two-ball  micro   (Kontes  K-569001-0219  or
equivalent).
  5.2.8 Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.3  Boiling  chips—Approximately   10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C for 30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water  bath—Heated,  with  concentric
ring cover,  capable of temperature control
(±2°C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5  Balance—Analytical,  capable  of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.6  Gas   chromatograph—An   analytical
system  complete  with gas  chromatograph
suitable for on-column injection and all re-
quired accessories including  syringes,  ana-
lytical  columns, gases,  detector, and strip-
chart  recorder.  A  data  system  is  rec-
ommended for measuring peak areas.
  5.6.1  Column 1—1.2 m long x 2 or 4 mm ID
glass, packed with 1.95% QF-1/1.5% OV-17 on
Gas-Chrom  Q  (80/100  mesh)  or equivalent.
This column was used to develop the method
performance statements given in Section 14.
Guidelines for  the  use of alternate column
packings are provided in Section 12.1.
  5.6.2  Column 2—3.0 m long x 2 or 4 mm ID
glass, packed with 3% OV-101 on Gas-Chrom
Q (80/100 mesh)  or equivalent.
  5.6.3  Detectors—Flame   ionization   and
electron capture detectors. The flame ioniza-
tion detector (FID)  is used when determining
isophorone  and nitrobenzene.  The electron
capture detector (BCD)  is used when deter-
mining the dinitrotoluenes. Both  detectors
have  proven  effective in  the   analysis of
wastewaters and were used in develop the
method performance statements in Section
14. Guidelines for the use to alternate detec-
tors are provided in Section 12.1.

                6. Reagents
  6.1  Reagent  water—Reagent  water  is de-
fined as a water in which an interferent is
not observed at the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Sodium  hydroxide solution (10 N)—
Dissolve 40 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 100 mL.
  6.3  Sulfuric  acid (1+1)—Slowly, add 50 mL
of H2SO4 (ACS, sp. gr. 1.84) to 50 mL of rea-
gent water.
  6.4  Acetone, hexane, methanol, methylene
chloride—Pesticide quality or equivalent.
  6.5  Sodium sulfate—(ACS)  Granular, an-
hydrous. Purify by  heating at 400 °C  for 4 h
in a shallow tray.
  6.6  Flonsil—PR grade  (60/100 mesh). Pur-
chase activated at 1250 °F and store in dark
in glass containers with ground glass stop-
pers or foil-lined screw caps. Before use, acti-
vate each batch at  least 16 h at 200 °C in a
foil-covered  glass container  and  allow  to
cool.
  6.7  Stock standard solutions (1.00 ug/uL)—
Stock  standard solutions can  be  prepared
from pure  standard materials or purchased
as certified solutions.
  6.7.1  Prepare stock  standard  solutions by
accurately weighing about 0.0100 g of pure
material.  Dissolve  the material in hexane
and dilute to volume in a 10-mL volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity  is  assayed to  be 96% or  greater,  the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate the concentration of the  stock stand-
ard. Commercially prepared stock standards
can be used at any concentration if they are
certified by the manufacturer or by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.7.2  Transfer  the stock  standard solu-
tions  into  Teflon-sealed  screw-cap  bottles.
                                          143

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 609
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Store at 4 °C and protect from light. Stock
standard  solutions should be  checked fre-
quently for signs of  degradation  or evapo-
ration,  especially just prior to  preparing
calibration standards from them.
  6.7.3  Stock standard solutions must be re-
placed after six months,  or  sooner if com-
parison with  check  standards  indicates  a
problem.
  6.8  Quality   control  check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration
  7.1  Establish gas  chromatographic oper-
ating conditions equivalent to those given in
Table 1. The  gas chromatographic system
can be calibrated using the external standard
technique (Section 7.2) or the internal stand-
ard technique (Section 7.3).
  7.2  External standard  calibration proce-
dure:
  7.2.1  Prepare calibration standards at  a
minimum of three concentration  levels for
each parameter of interest  by adding vol-
umes of one or more stock  standards  to  a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
hexane. One of  the external standards should
be at a concentration near,  but above, the
MDL (Table 1)  and the other concentrations
should correspond to  the expected range of
concentrations found in real  samples  or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
  7.2.2  Using injections of 2 to 5 nL, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against the  mass injected. The re-
sults can be used to prepare a calibration
curve for each compound. Alternatively, if
the  ratio of response  to amount  injected
(calibration factor) is a  constant over the
working range  (<10%  relative standard devi-
ation, RSD) linearity  through the  origin can
be assumed and the average ratio or calibra-
tion factor can be used in place of a calibra-
tion curve.
  7.3  Internal  standard  calibration proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select one or more internal  standards that
are similar in analytical behavior to the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate that  the measurement of
the  internal standard  is not  affected by
method or matrix interferences. Because of
these limitations, no internal standard can
be suggested that is  applicable to all sam-
ples.
  7.3.1  Prepare calibration standards at  a
minimum of three concentration  levels for
each parameter of interest  by adding vol-
umes of one or more stock  standards  to  a
volumetric flash. To each calibration stand-
ard, add a known constant amount of one or
more internal  standards,  and dilute to vol-
ume with hexane.  One  of  the  standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the  MDL and  the  other  concentrations
should correspond to the expected range of
concentrations found in  real  samples  or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
  7.3.2  Using injections of 2 to 5 uL, analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses against concentration for each com-
pound  and internal  standard. Calculate re-
sponse factors (RF) for each compound using
Equation 1.
  Equation 1.
                   (Ais)(Cs)
where:
As=Response  for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
C,,=Concentration  of  the internal standard
  (jig/L).
Cs=Concentration  of  the parameter to  be
  measured (ngr/L).
  If the RF value over the working range is
a constant (<10% RSD), the RF  can be as-
sumed to be invariant  and the average RF
can be used for calculations.  Alternatively,
the results can be used  to plot a  calibration
curve of response ratios, As/Als, vs. RF.
  7.4  The working calibration curve,  cali-
bration factor, or  RF must be verified  on
each working day by the measurement of one
or more calibration  standards.  If  the re-
sponse for any  parameter  varies from the
predicted response by  more than ±15%, a new
calibration curve must  be prepared for that
compound.
  7.5  Before using any cleanup  procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date  elution patterns  and the  absence  of
interferences from the reagents.

             8. Quality Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and  an  ongoing
analysis  of spiked  samples  to evaluate and
document data quality.  The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks are compared with  established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes indicate  atypical method perform-
ance,  a quality control check  standard must
be analyzed  to  confirm that the measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1 The  analyst must  make  an initial,
one-time, demonstration  of the  ability  to
                                          144

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 609
generate acceptable accuracy  and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2  In  recognition of advances that are
occurring in  chromatography, the analyst is
permitted  certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.4, 11.1, and 12.1) to improve the sepa-
rations or  lower the cost of measurements.
Each time such a modification  is made to
the method, the analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3  Before processing  any samples,  the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate that interferences from the
analytical  system and glassware are  under
control. Each  time  a set of samples  is ex-
tracted or reagents  are changed, a reagent
water blank  must be processed as a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4  The laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data  quality.  This procedure  is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1,5  The laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4.  The frequency  of the check  standard
analyses is equivalent to  10% of all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries from samples  (Section 8.3)  meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6  The laboratory must  maintain per-
formance records to  document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To establish the ability to  generate
acceptable  accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality control  (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing each pa-
rameter of interest  in acetone at a con-
centration  of  20  ng/mL  for  each  dinitro-
toluene and  100 ng/mL for isophorone and
nitrobenzene.  The  QC  check  sample  con-
centrate must be obtained from the U.S. En-
vironmental  Protection  Agency,  Environ-
mental  Monitoring- and Support Laboratory
in Cincinnati, Ohio, if available. If not  avail-
able from that source, the QC check sample
concentrate must be obtained from another
external source. If not available from either
source  above,  the  QC check  sample con-
centrate must be prepared by the laboratory
using stock  standards prepared  independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet, prepare QC check sam-
ples at the  test  concentrations  shown  in
Table 2 by  adding 1.00 ml/ of QC check sam-
ple concentrate to each of four 1-L aliquots
of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze the  well-mixed QC check
samples according to the  method beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the average recovery (X) in
(ig/L, and the standard deviation of the re-
covery  (s) in ug/L, for each parameter using
the four results.
  8.2.5  For each parameter compare s and X
with the  corresponding acceptance criteria
for  precision  and  accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 2.  If s and X for all param-
eters of interest meet the  acceptance  cri-
teria, the system performance is acceptable
and  analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any  individual s exceeds the precision limit
or any  individual  X falls outside the range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter. Locate  and
correct the source of the problem and repeat
the test for all parameters of interest begin-
ning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3 The laboratory must, on an  ongoing
basis, spike at least 10% of the samples from
each sample site being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing one to
ten  samples per month, at  least one spiked
sample  per month is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample  should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If,  as  in  compliance  monitoring,
the concentration  of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit,  the spike should
be at that limit or 1 to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If  the concentration  of  a  specific
parameter  in  the  sample is  not  being
checked against a limit specific to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at the test con-
centration in Section 8.2.2  or  1  to  5 times
higher  than  the background concentration
determined  in  Section 8.3.2, whichever con-
centration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If  it  is impractical  to  determile
background levels before spiking (e.g., max-
imum holding-  times  will be exceeded),  the
spike concentration should be (1) the regu-
latory concentration limit, if any; or, if none
(2) the  larger of either 5 times higher than
the  expected  background concentration  or
the test concentration in Section 8.2.2.
  8.3.2  Analyze one sample  aliquot to deter-
mine the background concentration (B) of
each parameter. If necessary, prepare a new
QC check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate  for the background  concentra-
tions in the sample. Spike a second sample
aliquot  with 1.0 mL of the  QC check sample
concentrate and analyze it to determine  the
concentration after spiking (A) of each  pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100 (A-B)%/T, where  T is the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with the corresponding  QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 2. These
acceptance criteria were  calculated to  in-
clude an allowance for error in measurement
                                         145

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 609
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of both the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent that  the analyst's spike to  back-
ground ratio approaches 5:1.7  If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than the
test concentration in Section 8.2.2, the ana-
lyst must use either the QC acceptance  cri-
teria in Table 2, or optional QC acceptance
criteria calculated for the specific spike con-
centration. To calculate optional acceptance
criteria for the recovery of a parameter:  (1)
Calculate accuracy (X') using the equation in
Table 3, substituting the spike concentration
(T) for C; (2) calculate overall precision (S')
using the equation in Table 3, substituting X'
for X8; (3) calculate the range for recovery at
the  spike concentration  as (100 X7T) ±2.44
(100 S'/T)%.'
  8.3.4  If any individual P falls outside the
designated range for recovery, that param-
eter has failed the acceptance criteria. A
check  standard containing each parameter
that failed the criteria  must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4.  If any parameter fails the acceptance
criteria for recovery in  Section  8.3, a  QC
check  standard containing each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the  number  of parameters  being  simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance  of the labora-
tory.
  8.4.1  Prepare the QC check standard  by
adding  1.0 mL of   QC  check sample con-
centrate (Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L of rea-
gent water. The QC check standard needs
only to contain the parameters that failed
criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2  Analyze the QC check standard  to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each percent  re-
covery (Ps) as  100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3  Compare the percent  recovery (P,)
for each parameter with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 2. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared with these criteria. If
the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
side the designated range,  the laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control, and the problem must be
immediately identified and corrected. The
analytical result for that  parameter in the
unspiked sample is  suspect and may not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of QC program for the  labora-
tory, method  accuracy  for wastewater sam-
ples must be  assessed and records must be
maintained. After the analysis of five spiked
wastewater  samples as in Section 8.3, cal-
culate  the average percent recovery (P) and
the standard deviation of the  percent  recov-
ery (Sp). Express the accuracy assessment as
a percent recovery interval from P-2sp to
P+2sp. If P=90% and sp = 10%, for example,
the accuracy interval  is  expressed  as 70-
110%.  Update the accuracy assessment for
each parameter on a regular basis (e.g. after
each five to ten new  accuracy measure-
ments).
  8.6 It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with  this method. The specific prac-
tices that are most productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates  may be  ana-
lyzed to assess the precision of the environ-
mental  measurements. When  doubt exists
over the identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas chromatography  with a dissimilar  col-
umn,  specific  element  detector, or mass
spectrometer must be used. Whenever pos-
sible, the laboratory should analyze standard
reference  materials and participate  in  rel-
evant performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling
  9.1 Grab  samples  must  be  collected in
glass  containers.  Conventional  sampling
practices8 should be  followed, except  that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with  sample
before collection. Composite samples should
be collected in refrigerated glass containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program.  Automatic  sampling  equipment
must be as free as possible of Tygon tubing
and other potential sources of contamina-
tion.
  9.2 All  samples must be iced or  refrig-
erated  at 4  °C from  the time  of collection
until extraction.
  9.3 All samples must be extracted within 7
days of collection and completely analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.2

            10. Sample Extraction

  10.1  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the sample bottle for later determination
of sample volume.  Pour  the entire  sample
into a 2-L separatory funnel. Check  the pH
of the sample with wide-range  pH paper and
adjust to within the range of 5 to 9 with so-
dium hydroxide solution or sulfuric acid.
  10.2  Add 60 mL of  methylene chloride to
the sample  bottle,  seal, and shake  30  s to
rinse the inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to the separatory  funnel and extract  the
sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min. with
periodic venting  to release excess pressure.
Allow the organic layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 min. If the
emulsion  interface  between layers is more
than one-third the volume of the  solvent
layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation.
The optimum technique  depends upon the
sample,  but may include stirring, filtration
                                          146

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 609
 of  the  emulsion  through glass wool, cen-
 trifugation, or other physical methods. Col-
 lect the methylene chloride extract in a 250-
 mL Erlenmeyer flask.
  10.3  Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
 ylene chloride to  the sample bottle and re-
 peat the extraction procedure a second time,
 combining the extracts in the Erlenmeyer
 flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
 manner.
  10.4  Assemble   a  Kuderna-Danish  (K-D)
 concentrator by attaching a  10-mL  concen-
 trator tube to a  500-mL evaporative  flask.
 Other  concentration devices  or techniques
 may be used  in  place  of the K-D  concen-
 trator if the requirements of Section 8.2 are
 met.
  10.5  Pour the combined extract through a
 solvent-rinsed  drying  column  containing
 about  10  cm  of anhydrous sodium  sulfate,
 and collect the extract in the K-D  concen-
 trator.  Rinse the Erlenmeyer flask and col-
 umn with 20 to 30 mL of methylene chloride
 to complete the quantitative transfer.
  10.6  Sections 10.7 and 10.8 describe a pro-
 cedure  for exchanging the methylene chlo-
 ride solvent to hexane while concentrating
 the extract volume to 1.0 mL. When it is not
 necessary to achieve the MDL in Table 2, the
 solvent exchange may be made by the addi-
 tion of 50 mL of hexane and concentration to
 10 mL as described in Method 606, Sections
 10.7 and 10.8.
  10.7  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
 the evaporative flask and attach a three-ball
 Snyder column. Prewet the  Snyder column
 by adding about 1 mL of methylene chloride
 to the top. Place the K-D  apparatus on a hot
 water bath (60 to  65 °C) so that the  concen-
 trator tube is  partially immersed in the hot
 water,  and the entire lower rounded surface
 of the flask is bathed with hot vapor. Adjust
 the vertical position of the apparatus and
 the water  temperature  as required to com-
 plete the concentration in 15 to 20 min. At
 the proper rate of distillation the balls of the
 column will actively chatter but the cham-
 bers will not flood with condensed solvent.
 When the apparent volume of liquid reaches
 1 mL, remove the K-D apparatus and allow it
 to drain and cool for at least 10 min.
  10.8  Remove the Snyder column and rinse
 the flask and its lower joint into the concen-
trator  tube with  1 to 2  mL of methylene
chloride. A 5-mL syringe is recommended for
this operation. Add 1 to 2 mL of hexane and
a clean  boiling chip to the concentrator tube
and attach a two-ball micro-Snyder column.
Prewet the column by adding about 0.5 mL of
hexane  to the  top. Place the micro-K-D ap-
 paratus on a hot water bath (60 to 65 °C)  so
 that the concentrator tube is partially im-
mersed  in the hot  water. Adjust the vertical
position of the apparatus and the water tem-
perature as required to  complete the  con-
centration  in 5 to 10 min.  At the proper rate
of distillation the balls of the column will
 actively chatter but the chambers will not
 flood.  When the apparent volume  of liquid
 reaches 0.5  mL, remove the K-D apparatus
 and allow it to drain and cool for at least 10
 min.
  10.9  Remove  the  micro-Snyder  column
 and rinse its lower joint into  the concen-
 trator tube with  a minimum  amount of
 hexane. Adjust the extract volume to 1.0 mL.
 Stopper the concentrator tube and store re-
 frigerated if further processing will not be
 performed immediately. If  the  extract will
 be stored longer than two days, it should be
 transferred to a Teflon-sealed screw-cap vial.
 If the sample extract  requires no further
 cleanup, proceed with gas chromatographic
 analysis (Section 12). If the sample requires
 further cleanup, proceed to Section 11.
  10.10  Determine  the  original sample vol-
 ume by  refilling the sample  bottle to the
 mark and transferring  the  liquid to a  1000-
 mL graduated cylinder. Record the sample
 volume to the nearest 5 mL.

         11. Cleanup and Separation

  11.1  Cleanup procedures may not be nec-
 essary for a relatively clean sample matrix.
 If particular circumstances demand the use
 of a cleanup procedure,  the  analyst may use
 the procedure below or any other appropriate
 procedure. However, the  analyst first must
 demonstrate that the requirements of Sec-
 tion 8.2 can be met using the  method as re-
 vised to incorporate the cleanup procedure.
  11.2  Plorisil column cleanup:
  11.2.1  Prepare a slurry of 10 g of activated
 Florisil   in   methylene  chloride/hexane
 (1+9XV/V) and  place  the  Florisil  into a
 chromatographic column. Tap  the column to
 settle the Florisil and add 1  cm of anhydrous
 sodium sulfate to the top. Adjust the elution
 rate to about 2 mL/min.
  11.2.2  Just prior to exposure of the sodium
 sulfate layer to the  air, quantitatively trans-
 fer the sample extract onto the column using
 an additional 2 mL of hexane to complete the
 transfer. Just prior to  exposure of the so-
 dium sulfate layer  to the air, add 30 mL of
 methylene chloride/hexane (1  + 9XV/V) and
 continue the elution of  the  column. Discard
 the eluate.
  11.2.3  Next, elute the  column with 30 mL
 of acetone/methylene chloride (1 + 9)(V/V)
into a 500-mL K-D flask equipped with a 10-
mL concentrator tube. Concentrate the col-
lected fraction as in Sections  10.6, 10.7,  10.8,
and 10.9 including the solvent  exchange to 1
mL of  hexane.  This fraction should contain
the nitroaromatics  and  isophorone. Analyze
by gas chromatography (Section 12).

          12. Gas Chromatography

  12.1   Isophorone and nitrobenzene are  ana-
lyzed by injection of a portion  of the extract
into an FIDGC. The dinitrotoluenes are  ana-
lyzed by a separate injection into an ECDGC.
                                         147

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 609
                           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Table 1 summarizes the recommended oper-
ating conditions for the gas chromatograph.
Included in this  table  are  retention times
and MDL that can be achieved under these
conditions.  Examples  of the  separations
achieved by Column 1 are shown in Figures 1
and 2. Other packed or capillary (open-tubu-
lar)  columns,  chromatographic conditions,
or detectors may be used if the requirements
of Section 8.2 are met.
  12.2  Calibrate  the system daily as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12.3  If the  internal  standard calibration
procedure is being used, the internal stand-
ard must be added to the same extract and
mixed thoroughly  immediately before injec-
tion into the gas chromatograph.
  12.4  Inject 2 to 5 ^L of the sample extract
or  standard into  the  gas  chromatograph
using the solvent-flush technique.9 Smaller
(1.0 uL)  volumes may  be injected if  auto-
matic devices are employed. Record the vol-
ume injected to the nearest 0.05 |iL,  the total
extract volume, and the resulting peak size
in area or peak height units.
  12.5  Identify the parameters in the sample
by  comparing  the retention times of the
peaks  in the  sample  chromatogram with
those    of    the    peaks    in    standard
chromatograms. The width  of the retention
time  window  used to make  identifications
should be based upon measurements of ac-
tual retention  time variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three times the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound  can be  used to calculate  a sug-
gested window size; however,  the experience
of the analyst should weigh heavily in the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  12.6  If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range  of the system, dilute the ex-
tract and reanalyze.
  12.7  If the measurement of the  peak re-
sponse is prevented by the presence of inter-
ferences, further cleanup is required.

              13. Calculations
  13.1  Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  13.1.1  If the external standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the amount  of
material injected  from the  peak  response
using the  calibration curve  or calibration
factor determined in Section  7.2.2.  The con-
centration in  the  sample can be calculated
from Equation 2.
     Concentration (|J.g/L) =
(A)(Vt)
(v,)(vs)
                                Equation 2
where:
A=Amount of material injected (ng).
V,=Volume of extract injected (uL).
V,=Volume of total extract (nL).
Vs=Volume of water extracted (mL).
  13.1.2  If the internal standard calibration
procedure is  used, calculate the  concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined  in Section  7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.

                            (AS)(IS)
  Concentration (ug/L) = ,  \/ A /—r-
                         (A1S)(RF)(V0)

                                Equation 3

where:
As=Response  for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
Als=Response for the internal standard.
Is=Amount of internal  standard  added  to
  each extract (\ig).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2 Report results in ug/L without correc-
tion for recovery  data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          14. Method Performance

  14.1 The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined  as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero. ' The MDL concentrations listed
in  Table 1  were obtained  using reagent
water.10 Similar results were achieved using
representative wastewaters. The MDL  actu-
ally achieved in  a given analysis will vary
depending on instrument sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2 This method has been tested for lin-
earity of spike recovery from reagent water
and has been demonstrated  to be applicable
over the concentration range from 7xMDL to
lOOOxMDL.1"
  14.3 This method was tested by 18 labora-
tories using reagent water, drinking water,
surface    water,   and  three   industrial
wastewaters  spiked  at  six  concentrations
over the range 1.0 to 515 ug/L.11 Single oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter and es-
sentially independent of the sample matrix.
Linear equations  to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 3.

               REFERENCES

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. "Determination of Nitroaromatic  Com-
pounds and Isophorone in Industrial and Mu-
nicipal Wastewaters," EPA 6007 4-82-024, Na-
tional Technical Information Service, PB82-
208398, Springfield, Virginia 22161, May 1982.
  3. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constituents," American So-
ciety for Testing and  Materials, Philadel-
phia.
                                         148

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
               Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 609
  4. "Carcinogens—Working  With Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare,  Public  Health  Service, Center  for
Disease Control,  National Institute for Occu-
pational  Safety and  Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  5. "OSHA  Safety  and  Health Standards,
General Industry," (29  CFR part 1910), Occu-
pational  Safety  and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion, Committee on Chemical  Safety,  3rd
Edition, 1979.
  7. Provost, L.P., and  Elder, R.S.  "Interpre-
tation  of Percent Recovery Data," American
Laboratory,  15, 58-63 (1983).  (The  value 2.44
used in the equation in  Section 8.3.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  8.  ASTM Annual Book  of Standards, Part
31,  D3370-76. "Standard Practices for  Sam-
pling Water," American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  9.  Burke, J.A.  "Gas Chromatography  for
Pesticide Residue Analysis; Some Practical
Aspects," Journal of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, 48,  1037 (1965).
  10.  "Determination  of  Method  Detection
Limit and Analytical Curve for EPA Method
609—Nitroaromatics and Isophorone," Special
letter report for EPA Contract  68-03-2624,
U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, En-
vironmental Monitoring  and  Support Lab-
oratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, June 1980.
  11.  "EPA Method  Study 19,  Method  609
(Nitroaromatics and  Isophorone)," EPA 600/4-
84-018, National Technical Information Serv-
ice,  PB84-176908, Springfield,  Virginia  22161,
March 1984.
            TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Parameter
Nitrobenzene 	 ....
2 6-Dmitrotoluene 	

2,4-Dimtrotoluene . . 	
Retention time (mm)
Col 1
331
352
449
535
Col. 2
431
475
572
6.54
Method detection limit (ug/L)
ECDGC
137
001
157
0.02
FIDGC
36
57
  AAColumn 1 conditions- Gas-Chrom Q (80/100 mesh) coated with 1 95% QF-1/1 5% OV-17 packed in a 1.2 m long x 2 mm
or 4 mm ID glass column  A 2 mm ID column and nitrogen carrier gas at 44 mL/min flow rate were used when determining
Isophorone and nitrobenzene by FIDGC The column temperature was held isothermal at 85 °C A 4 mm ID column and 10%
methane/90% argon carrier gas at 44 mL/min flow rate were used when determining the dmitrotoluenes by ECDGC The column
temperature was held isothermal at 145 °C.
  AAColumn 2 conditions Gas-Chrom Q (80/100 mesh) coated with 3% OV-101 packed in a 3 0 m long x 2 mm or 4 mm ID
glass column A 2 mm ID column and nitrogen carrier gas at 44 mL/mm flow rate were used when determining isophorone and
nitrobenzene by FIDGC The column temperature was held isothermal at 100 °C A 4 mm ID column and 10% methane/90%
argon carrier gas  at 44 mL/min flow rate were used when determining the dmitrotoluenes by ECDGC The column temperature
was held isothermal at 150 °C

                       TABLE 2—QC  ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 609
Parameter

2,6-Dimtrotoluene 	
Isophorone 	 . ...
Nitrobenzene ... 	
Test Cone
(ng/L)
20
20
100
100
Limit for s
(ra/L)
5 1
48
323
333
Range for X
(ng/L)
36-228
38-230
80-1000
257-1000
Range for
P, P, (%)
6-125
8-126
D-117
6-118
  s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in ug/L (Section 824)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ug/L (Section 824)
  P, P,=Percent recovery measured (Section 8.3 2, Section 842)
  D=Detected, result must be greater than zero
  NOTE  These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 3 Where necessary, the limits for recov-
ery have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3.

  TABLE 3—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 609
Parameter
2,4-Dmitro-
toluene
2,6-Dimtro-
toluene
Isophorone . . ... . . ...
Nitrobenzene . 	
Accuracy, as re-
covery, X' (ug/L)
0 65C+0 22
0 66C+0 20
0 49C+2 93
0 60C+2 00
Single analyst pre-
cision, s/ (ug/L)
0 20X+0 08
019X+0.06
0 28X+2 77
0.25X+2.53
Overall precision,
S' (ug/L)
0.37X-0.07
036X-000
0 46X+0 31
0.37X-078
  X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentratton of C, m uo/L
  s,'=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in pg/L
  S'=Expected mterlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ug/L
  C=True value for the concentration, in ug/L.
  X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in ug/L
                                             149

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 609
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
               COLUMN: 1.5% OV-17/1.95% QF-1 ON GAS CHROM Q
               TEMPERATURE: 85°C.
               DETECTOR: FLAME IONIZATION
                  01

                  01
                  NJ
                  m
                  O
                      i
                      O
                      a.

               2   4   6  8   10  12
                 RETENTION TIME, MIN.
        Figure 1.  Gas chromatogram
                    of nitrobenzene
                    and isophorone.
                              150

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                        Pt. 136, App. A.Meth. 609
               COLUMN: 1.5% OV-17/1.95% QF-1 ON GAS CHROM Q
               TEMPERATURE: 145°C.
               DETECTOR: ELECTRON CAPTURE
                  LLJ

                  LU
LLI
111

O
O
                  5
                  i   I
                  I   !
                  9   CM'
                  
-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 610
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    METHOD 610—POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC
              HYDROCARBONS

          1. Scope and Application
  1.1  This method covers the determination
of  certain  polynuclear  aromatic  hydro-
carbons  (PAH).  The  following  parameters
can be determined by this method:
Parameter
Acenaphthene 	
Acenaphthylene . .
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo{b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene .
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene . .
Pyrene . . ...
STORET No
34205
34200
34220
34526
34247
34230
34521
34242
34320
34556
34376
34381
34403
34696
34461
34469
CAS No
83-32-9
208-96-8
120-12-7
56-55-3
50-32-8
205-99-2
191-24-2
207-08-9
218-01-9
53-70-3
206-44-0
86-73-7
193-39-5
91-20-3
85-01-8
129-00-0
  1.2  This is a chromatographic method ap-
plicable to the determination of the com-
pounds listed above in municipal and indus-
trial  discharges as provided under 40  CFR
136.1.  When this method is  used to analyze
unfamiliar samples for any or all of the com-
pounds  above,  compound   identifications
should be supported  by at  least  one addi-
tional qualitative technique. Method 625 pro-
vides  gas  chromatograph/mass spectrometer
(GC/MS) conditions appropriate for the qual-
itative and quantitative confirmation of re-
sults  for  many  of  the  parameters  listed
above, using the  extract produced by this
method.
  1.3  This method provides for both  high
performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC)
and gas  chromatographic (GC) approaches
for the determination of  PAHs. The  gas
chromatographic  procedure  does not  ade-
quately resolve the  following four pairs of
compounds: Anthracene and phenanthrene;
chrysene      and     benzo(a)anthracene;
benzo(b)fluoranthene                   and
benzo(k)fluoranthene;  and dibenzo(a.h)  an-
thracene and indeno (l,2,3-cd)pyrene.  Unless
the purpose for the analysis  can be served by
reporting  the sum of an unresolved pair, the
liquid chromatographic approach must be
used  for   these  compounds.   The  liquid
chromatographic method does resolve all 16
of the PAHs listed.
  1.4  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined  in Section 15.1)* for each parameter is
listed in  Table 1. The MDL  for  a specific
wastewater may differ from  those listed, de-
pending upon the  nature  of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.5  The sample  extraction and concentra-
tion steps in this method are essentially the
same  as in Methods 606, 608,  609, 611, and 612.
Thus, a single sample may be extracted to
measure the  parameters  included  in the
scope of each of these methods. When clean-
up is required, the concentration levels must
be high enough to permit selecting aliquots,
as necessary, to  apply  appropriate cleanup
procedures. Selection of the aliquots must be
made prior to the solvent exchange steps of
this method. The analyst is allowed the lati-
tude,  under Sections 12 and 13,  to  select
chromatographic conditions appropriate for
the simultaneous measurement of combina-
tions of these parameters.
  1.6  Any modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered  as a  major modification subject to
application and approval of alternate test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.7  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the  supervision  of  analysts  experi-
enced in the use of HPLC and GC systems
and in the interpretation of liquid and gas
chromatograms.  Each  analyst  must  dem-
onstrate the  ability to  generate  acceptable
results with this method using the procedure
described in Section 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A  measured volume  of sample, ap-
proximately  1-L,  is extracted with  meth-
ylene chloride using a separatory funnel. The
methylene chloride extract is dried and con-
centrated to a volume of 10 mL or less. The
extract is then separated by HPLC  or GC. Ul-
traviolet (UV) and fluorescence detectors are
used with HPLC to identify and measure the
PAHs. A flame  ionization detector is used
with GC.2
  2.2  The method provides  a  silica gel col-
umn cleanup procedure to  aid in the elimi-
nation of interferences that may be encoun-
tered.

              3. Interferences

  3.1  Method interferences may be caused
by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample  processing hardward
that lead to discrete artifacts and/or ele-
vated baselines in the chromatograms. All of
these  materials  must  be  routinely  dem-
onstrated to be free from interferences under
the conditions of the analysis by running
laboratory reagent blanks  as described in
Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1 Glassware  must   be   scrupulously
cleaned.3 Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
sible after use by rinsing with the last sol-
vent used in it. Solvent rinsing should be fol-
lowed by detergent washing with hot  water,
and  rinses  with  tap  water  and distilled
water. The glassware should then be drained
dry, and heated in a muffle furnace at 400 °C
for 15 to 30 min. Some thermally stable ma-
terials, such as PCBs, may not be eliminated
by this treatment. Solvent  rinses with ace-
tone and pesticide quality hexane may be
                                         152

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 610
substituted for  the  muffle furnace  heating.
Thorough rinsing with such solvents usually
eliminates  PCB  interference.  Volumetric
ware should not be heated in a muffle fur-
nace. After  drying  and  cooling, glassware
should be sealed and stored in a clean envi-
ronment  to prevent any accumulation of
dust or other contaminants.  Store  inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2 The use of high purity reagents and
solvents helps to minimize interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required.
  3.2  Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are co-extracted from the
sample. The extent of matrix interferences
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending upon the nature and diversity of
the industrial complex or municipality being
sampled. The cleanup procedure in Section
11 can be used  to overcome many  of these
interferences, but unique samples may re-
quire  additional   cleanup  approaches  to
achieve the MDL listed in Table 1.
  3.3  The extent  of interferences that may
be encountered using liquid chromatographic
techniques has  not been  fully assessed. Al-
though the HPLC  conditions described allow
for a unique resolution of the specific PAH
compounds  covered  by this method,  other
PAH compounds may interfere.

                  4. Safety
  4.1  The  toxicity   or  carcinogenicity  of
each reagent used in this method have not
been precisely defined; however,  each  chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. From  this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The  laboratory is responsible for
maintaining  a  current   awareness  file  of
OSHA regulations regarding  the safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made available  to all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional references to laboratory safety
are available and have been identified4-6 for
the information of the analyst.
  4.2  The following parameters  covered  by
this method have been tentatively classified
as known or suspected, human or mamma-
lian   carcinogens:    benzo(a)anthracene,
benzo(a)pyrene,  and dibenzo(a,h)-anthracene.
Primary standards of these toxic compounds
should be  prepared in a hood. A  NIOSH/
MESA approved toxic gas respirator should
be worn when the  analyst handles high con-
centrations of these toxic  compounds.

         5. Apparatus and Materials
  5.1  Sampling equipment, for  discrete  or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1  Grab sample bottle—1-L  or  1-qt,
amber glass, fitted with  a screw cap lined
with Tenon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If amber
bottles  are not  available,  protect  samples
from light. The bottle and cap liner must be
washed,  rinsed with acetone or methylene
chloride, and dried  before  use  to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2  Automatic sampler (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample con-
tainers  for the collection of a  minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4°C and protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic  pump,  a  minimum length of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may be
used. Before  use, however,  the  compressible
tubing  should be  thoroughly  rinsed  with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize the  potential for
contamination of the sample. An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All specifications are sug-
gested. Catalog numbers are included for il-
lustration only.):
  5.2.1  Separatory funnel—2-L, with Teflon
stopcock.
  5.2.2  Drying    column—Chromatographic
column, approximately 400 mm long x 19 mm
ID, with coarse frit filter disc.
  5.2.3  Concentrator  tube,  Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL, graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration  must be checked
at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass stopper is used to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.4  Evaporative  flask, Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL (Kontes K-570001-0500 or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.5  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Three-ball  macro (Kontes  K-503000-0121  or
equivalent).
  5.2.6  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Two-ball  micro   (Kontes  K-569001-0219  or
equivalent).
  5.2.7  Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.2.8  Chromatographic  column—250  mm
long x 10 mm ID, with coarse frit filter disc
at bottom and Teflon stopcock.
  5.3 Boiling  chips—Approximately   10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C  for 30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4 Water  bath—Heated,  with concentric
ring  cover, capable  of temperature control
(±2 °C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5 Balance—Analytical,  capable of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.6 High    performance   liquid    chro-
matograph (HPLC)—An   analytical  system
complete with column supplies, high pres-
sure  syringes,  detectors,  and  compatible
strip-chart recorder. A data system is rec-
ommended for measuring peak areas and re-
tention times.
  5.6.1  Gradient pumping system—Constant
flow.
                                          153

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 610
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  5.6.2  Reverse phase column—HC-ODS Sil-
X, 5 micron particle diameter, in a 25  cm x
2.6  mm ID stainless steel column (Perkin
Elmer  No. 089-0716 or equivalent).  This col-
umn was  used to develop the method  per-
formance  statements in Section 15. Guide-
lines   for  the  use  of alternate  column
packings are provided in Section 12.2.
  5.6.3  Detectors—Fluorescence  and/or UV
detectors. The fluorescence detector is used
for  excitation at 280 nm and emission greater
than 389 nm cutoff (Corning 3-75 or equiva-
lent).  Fluorometers should have  dispersive
optics  for  excitation and can utilize either
filter or dispersive optics at the emission de-
tector. The UV detector is used at 254 nm
and should be coupled to the fluorescence de-
tector. These detectors  were used to develop
the method performance statements in Sec-
tion 15. Guidelines for  the use  of  alternate
detectors are provided in Section 12.2.
  5.7  Gas   chromatograph—An  analytical
system complete with temperature program-
mable  gas chromatograph  suitable for on-
column or splitless injection and all required
accessories  including   syringes,  analytical
columns, gases, detector, and strip-chart re-
corder. A data system  is  recommended for
measuring peak areas.
  5.7.1  Column—1.8 m long x 2 mm ID glass,
packed with 3%  OV-17 on Chromosorb W-
AW-DCMS (100/120 mesh) or equivalent. This
column was  used to develop the  retention
time data in Table 2. Guidelines for the use
of alternate column packings are provided in
Section 13.3.
  5.7.2  Detector—Flame ionization detector.
This detector has proven  effective in the
analysis  of wastewaters for the parameters
listed  in the  scope  (Section 1.1), excluding
the four pairs of unresolved compounds list-
ed in Section 1.3. Guidelines for the use of al-
ternate detectors are  provided  in Section
13.3.

                6. Reagents
  6.1  Reagent water—Reagent water is de-
fined as a water in which an interferent is
not observed at the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.3  Cyclohexane,   methanol,     acetone,
methylene chloride, pentane—Pesticide  qual-
ity  or equivalent.
  6.4  Acetonitrile—HPLC  quality,  distilled
in glass.
  6.5  Sodium sulfate—(ACS)  Granular, an-
hydrous. Purify by heating at 400 °C for 4 h in
a shallow tray.
  6.6  Silica  gel—100/200   mesh,   desiccant,
Davison, grade-923 or equivalent. Before use,
activate for at least 16  h at 130 °C in a  shal-
low glass tray, loosely covered with foil.
  6.7  Stock standard solutions (1.00 (ig/|J.L)—
Stock  standard solutions  can be  prepared
from pure standard materials or purchased
as certified solutions.
  6.7.1  Prepare stock standard solutions by
accurately weighing about 0.0100 g of pure
material.  Dissolve the material  in acetoni-
trile and dilute to volume in a 10-mL volu-
metric flask. Larger volumes can be used at
the convenience of the analyst.  When com-
pound purity is assayed to be 96% or greater,
the weight can be used without correction to
calculate  the concentration  of the  stock
standard.   Commercially   prepared   stock
standards can be used at any concentration
if they are certified by the manufacturer or
by an independent source.
  6.7.2  Transfer  the stock  standard solu-
tions into Teflon-sealed screw-cap bottles.
Store at 4 °C and protect from light. Stock
standard solutions should  be  checked  fre-
quently for signs of degradation or evapo-
ration,  especially just  prior to preparing
calibration standards from them.
  6.7.3  Stock standard solutions  must be re-
placed after  six months, or sooner if com-
parison with check  standards  indicates a
problem.
  6.8  Quality control  check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration

  7.1  Establish liquid or gas chromatogra-
phic  operating   conditions  equivalent  to
those  given  in  Table   1   or  2.   The
chromatographic  system can be  calibrated
using the external standard technique (Sec-
tion 7.2) or the internal standard technique
(Section 7.3).
  7.2  External standard calibration proce-
dure:
  7.2.1  Prepare  calibration standards  at a
minimum of three concentration levels  for
each parameter of interest by adding  vol-
umes of one or more  stock standards to a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
acetonitrile.  One of the external standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the MDL (Table 1) and the other concentra-
tions should correspond  to  the  expected
range of concentrations  found in real sam-
ples or should define the working range of
the detector.
  7.2.2  Using injections of 5 to 25  p.L  for
HPLC and 2 to 5 p.L for GC,  analyze each cali-
bration standard  according to Section 12 or
13,  as appropriate. Tabulate peak height or
area responses against  the mass injected.
The results can be used to prepare a calibra-
tion curve for each compound. Alternatively,
if the ratio of response  to  amount injected
(calibration  factor)  is a constant over the
working range (<10% relative standard devi-
ation, RSD),  linearity through the origin can
be assumed and the average ratio or calibra-
tion factor can be used in place of a calibra-
tion curve.
  7.3  Internal standard calibration proce-
dure—To use  this approach, the analyst must
select  one or more  internal standards that
are similar  in analytical  behavior  to  the
                                          154

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                       Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 610
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate  that the measurement of
the  internal  standard is not  affected  by
method or matrix interferences. Because of
these limitations, no internal standard can
be suggested that is  applicable to all  sam-
ples.
  7.3.1  Prepare  calibration standards  at  a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each parameter of interest by adding vol-
umes of one or more stock standards  to a
volumetric flask. To each calibration stand-
ard, add a known constant amount of one or
more internal standards,  and dilute to vol-
ume with acetonitrile. One of the standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the  MDL  and  the  other  concentrations
should correspond to the expected range of
concentrations  found in  real  samples  or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
  7.3.2  Using injections of 5 to 25 )iL for
HPLC and 2 to 5  nL for GC, analyze each cali-
bration standard according to Section 12 or
13, as appropriate. Tabulate peak height or
area  responses  against  concentration for
each compound  and internal  standard. Cal-
culate response  factors (RF)  for each  com-
pound using Equation 1.
             RF =
(AS)(CIS)
(Ais)(Cs)
                                Equation 1

where:
A s=Response  for the parameter  to be meas-
  ured.
Als=Response for the internal standard.
Cls=Concentration  of  the internal  standard
  (Hg/L).
Cs=Concentration  of  the parameter to  be
  measured
If the RP value over the working range is a
constant (<10% RSD), the RP can be assumed
to be invariant and the average RP can  be
used for calculations. Alternatively, the re-
sults can be used to plot a calibration curve
of response ratios, A,/A1S, vs. RF.
  7.4  The  working calibration curve, cali-
bration factor,  or  RF  must toe  verified  on
each working day by the measurement of one
or more  calibration standards.  If  the  re-
sponse for any parameter varies from the
predicted response  by  more  than ±15%, the
test must be repeated  using  a fresh calibra-
tion  standard. Alternatively, a new calibra-
tion  curve must be prepared for that com-
pound.
  7.5  Before using any cleanup procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date elution patterns  and the  absence  of
interferences from the reagents.
             8. Quality Control
  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of spiked samples  to evaluate and
document data quality. The  laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks  are compared with  established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes  indicate  atypical  method  perform-
ance,  a  quality control check standard must
be analyzed  to  confirm  that the measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1  The  analyst must make an initial,
one-time, demonstration  of the ability  to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2  In recognition of advances  that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions  10.4, 11.1, 12.2, and 13.3) to improve the
separations  or lower the cost of measure-
ments.  Each  time  such a  modification  is
made  to the method, the analyst is required
to repeat the procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3  Before processing- any samples the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate  that interferences from the
analytical system and glassware are under
control.  Each time a set of samples is ex-
tracted or reagents are  changed a reagent
water blank  must  be processed as a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4  The laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, spike  and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5  The laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate  through the analyses  of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4.  The frequency  of the  check  standard
analyses is equivalent to 10%  of all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from samples (Section  8.3) meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6  The  laboratory must maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure  is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish  the  ability to  generate
acceptable accuracy and precision,  the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing  each pa-
rameter of  interest at the  following  con-
centrations in acetonitrile: 100 ug/mL of any
                                         155

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 610
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of the six early-eluting PAHs (naphthalene,
acenaphthylene,   aoenaphthene,   fluorene,
phenanthrene, and anthracene); 5  |ig/mL of
benzo(k)fluoranthene; and 10 ng/mL of any of
the other PAHs. The QC check  sample con-
centrate must be obtained from the U.S. En-
vironmental  Protection Agency,  Environ-
mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
in Cincinnati, Ohio, if available. If not avail-
able from that source, the QC check sample
concentrate must  be obtained from another
external source.  If not available from either
source  above, the QC check  sample  con-
centrate must be prepared by the laboratory
using  stock  standards prepared  independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet, prepare QC check sam-
ples at  the  test  concentrations  shown in
Table 3 by adding  1.00  mL of QC check sam-
ple concentrate to each of four 1-L aliquots
of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze  the well-mixed QC   check
samples according to the method beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the average recovery (X) in
Hg/L,  and the standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in ng/L, for  each  parameter using
the four results.
  8.2.5  For each parameter  compare s  and X
with  the corresponding acceptance criteria
for precision and  accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 3.  If s  and X for all param-
eters  of interest  meet the acceptance cri-
teria, the system  performance is acceptable
and analysis  of actual samples can begin. If
any individual s exceeds the precision limit
or any  individual  X falls outside  the  range
for accuracy, the system performance  is un-
acceptable for that parameter.
  NOTE: The  large number of parameters in
Table  3 present   a  substantial probability
that one or more will fail at least one of the
acceptance criteria when all parameters are
analyzed.
  8.2.6  When one  or more of the parameters
tested fail at least one of the acceptance cri-
teria, the analyst  must proceed according to
Section 8.2.6.1 or 8.2.6.2.
  8.2.6.1  Locate and correct the  source of
the problem  and repeat the test for all pa-
rameters of interest beginning with Section
8.2.2.
  8.2.6.2  Beginning with Section 8.2.2, repeat
the  test  only  for  those  parameters  that
failed  to meet  criteria.  Repeated failure,
however,  will confirm a  general problem
with the measurement  system. If this occurs,
locate and correct the  source of the problem
and repeat the test for all compounds of in-
terest beginning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The laboratory  must, on an ongoing
basis, spike at least 10% of the samples from
each sample  site being monitored  to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing  one to
ten samples per month, at  least one  spiked
sample per month  is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If, as  in  compliance  monitoring,
the concentration of a specific parameter in
the sample is  being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit,  the spike should
be at that limit or 1 to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the  concentration of  a specific
parameter in  the  sample  is  not  being
checked against a limit specific to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at the test con-
centration in  Section  8.2.2  or 1 to 5 times
higher than the background  concentration
determined in Section 8.3.2, whichever con-
centration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If it is impractical to  determine
background levels before spiking (e.g., max-
imum holding times will be  exceeded), the
spike concentration should be (1) the regu-
latory concentration  limit, if any;  or, if
none, (2) the larger of either 5 times higher
than the expected background concentration
or the test concentration in  Section 8.2.2.
  8.3.2  Analyze one sample  aliquot to deter-
mine the background  concentration (B) of
each parameter. If necessary,  prepare a new
QC check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate for  the background concentra-
tions in the sample. Spike  a  second  sample
aliquot with 1.0  mL of the QC check  sample
concentrate and analyze it to determine the
concentration  after spiking (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100 (A-B)%/T, where T is the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter  with the corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 3. These
acceptance criteria were calculated to in-
clude an allowance for  error in measurement
of both the background and  spike concentra-
tions, assuming  a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent that the analyst's  spike  to  back-
ground ratio approaches 5:1.7  If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than the
test concentration in Section 8.2.2, the ana-
lyst must use  either the QC acceptance cri-
teria in Table 3, or optional QC acceptance
criteria calculated for the specific  spike con-
centration. To calculate optional acceptance
criteria for the recovery of a parameter: (1)
Calculate accuracy (X') using the equation in
Table 4, substituting the spike concentration
(T) for C; (2) calculate overall precision (S')
using the equation in Table 4, substituting X'
for X; (3) calculate the range for recovery at
the spike  concentration as (100 X7T)±2.44(100
S'/T)%.7
  8.3.4  If any individual P  falls outside the
designated range for recovery, that  param-
eter has  failed  the acceptance criteria. A
check standard  containing  each parameter
                                         156

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 610
that failed the critiera must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
criteria  for recovery  in  Section 8.3, a QC
check  standard containing each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the  number of parameters  being simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance of the  labora-
tory. If the entire list of parameters in Table
3 must be measured in the sample in Section
8.3, the probability that the analysis of a QC
check  standard will be required is high. In
this case the QC check standard should be
routinely analyzed with the spike sample.
  8.4.1   Prepare the QC check  standard by
adding  1.0  mL of QC check sample  con-
centrate (Section 8.2.1 or  8.3.2) to 1 L of  rea-
gent water. The QC  check  standard needs
only to  contain the parameters that failed
criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2   Analyze the QC check standard to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the  standard concentration.
  8.4.3   Compare the  percent  recovery  (Ps)
for each parameter with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 3. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared with these criteria. If
the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
side the designated  range,  the laboratory
performance for that  parameter is judged to
be out of control,  and the problem must be
immediately identified and  corrected.  The
analytical result for  that parameter in  the
unsplked sample is suspect and may not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the  lab-
oratory, method accuracy for  wastewater
samples  must be assessed and records must
be maintained. After the analysis  of  five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8._3,
calculate the  average percent recovery  (P)
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent recovery interval  from P-2sp to
P+2sp. If P=90% and Sp=10%, for example,  the
accuracy interval   is  expressed as 70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter  on  a regular  basis (e g. after each
five to  ten new  accuracy measurements).
  8.6 It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this method  The  specific prac-
tices that are most productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates  may be ana-
lyzed to assess the  precision  of the environ-
mental  measurements. When  doubt exists
over the identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas chromatography with a  dissimilar  col-
umn,  specific  element  detector,  or mass
spectrometer must be used. Whenever pos-
sible, the laboratory should analyze standard
reference  materials and participate  in rel-
evant performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  Grab  samples  must  be collected  in
glass  containers.  Conventional   sampling
practices8  should be  followed,  except that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with  sample
before collection. Composite samples  should
be collected in refrigerated glass containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program.  Automatic  sampling  equipment
must be as free as  possible of Tygon  tubing
and  other  potential  sources of contamina-
tion.
  9.2  All  samples  must be  iced  or  refrig-
erated at 4°C from the time  of  collection
until extraction. PAHs are  known to be light
sensitive;  therefore, samples, extracts, and
standards should be stored in amber or foil-
wrapped bottles in order to minimize  photo-
lytic decomposition. Pill the sample  bottles
and, if residual chlorine is present, add 80 mg
of sodium thiosulfate  per liter of sample and
mix  well.  EPA Methods 330.4 and 330.5 may
be used for measurement  of residual chlo-
rine.9 Field test  kits are available for this
purpose.
  9.3  All samples must be extracted within 7
days of collection and completely analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.2

           10. Sample Extraction

  10.1  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the  sample bottle for later determination
of sample volume.  Pour the entire sample
into a 2-L separatory funnel.
  10.2  Add 60 mL of  methylene chloride  to
the sample bottle,  seal, and shake 30 s  to
rinse the inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to the  separatory  funnel  and  extract the
sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min. with
periodic venting  to release excess pressure.
Allow the organic layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 min. If the
emulsion interface  between  layers is more
than  one-third  the volume  of  the solvent
layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation.
The  optimum technique depends  upon the
sample, but may include stirring, filtration
of the  emulsion through  glass wool, cen-
trifugation, or other physical methods.  Col-
lect the methylene chloride extract in a 250-
mL Erlenmeyer flask.
  10.3  Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
ylene chloride to the  sample bottle and re-
peat the extraction  procedure a second time,
combining  the  extracts in the  Erlenmeyer
flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
manner.
                                         157

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 610
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  10.4  Assemble  a  Kuderna-Danish  (K-D)
concentrator by attaching a 10-mL concen-
trator tube to a 500-mL  evaporative  flask.
Other  concentration  devices  or techniques
may be used  in  place  of the K-D concen-
trator if the requirements of Section 8.2 are
met.
  10.5  Pour the combined extract through a
solvent-rinsed  drying  column  containing
about  10  cm  of anhydrous sodium sulfate,
and collect the extract in the K-D concen-
trator. Rinse the Erlenmeyer flask and col-
umn with 20 to 30 mL of methylene chloride
to complete the quantitative transfer.
  10.6  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
the evaporative flask  and  attach a three-ball
Snyder column. Prewet the  Snyder column
by adding about 1 mL of methylene chloride
to the top. Place the K-D  apparatus on a hot
water bath (60 to 65 °C) so that the concen-
trator tube is  partially immersed in the hot
water, and the entire lower rounded surface
of the flask is bathed with hot vapor. Adjust
the vertical position of the apparatus  and
the water temperature  as required to com-
plete  the  concentration in 15 to 20 min. At
the proper rate of distillation the balls of the
column will actively  chatter but the cham-
bers will not  flood with condensed solvent.
When the  apparent  volume of liquid reaches
1 mL, remove the K-D apparatus and allow it
to drain and cool for at least 10 min.
  10.7  Remove the  Snyder column and rinse
the flask and its lower joint into the concen-
trator tube with 1 to  2  mL of methylene
chloride. A 5-mL syringe is recommended for
this  operation. Stopper  the  concentrator
tube and store refrigerated if further proc-
essing will not be performed immediately. If
the extract will be stored longer than two
days,  it should be  transferred to a Teflon-
sealed screw-cap vial and protected from
light. If the sample extract requires no fur-
ther cleanup,   proceed  with  gas  or liquid
chromatographic analysis (Section 12 or 13).
If the sample  requires further cleanup, pro-
ceed to Section 11.
  10.8  Determine the original  sample vol-
ume by refilling the sample bottle  to  the
mark and transferring the liquid to a 1000-
mL graduated cylinder. Record the sample
volume to the  nearest 5 mL.

         11. Cleanup and Separation

  11.1  Cleanup procedures may not be nec-
essary for a relatively clean  sample matrix.
If particular circumstances demand the use
of a cleanup procedure, the analyst may use
the procedure below or any other appropriate
procedure.  However, the analyst first must
demonstrate that the requirements of Sec-
tion 8.2 can be met  using  the methods as re-
vised to incorporate the cleanup procedure.
  11.2  Before  the silica  gel  cleanup tech-
nique can  be  utilized,  the extract solvent
must be exchanged  to cyclohexane. Add 1 to
10 mL of  the  sample  extract  (in methylene
chloride) and a boiling chip to a clean K-D
concentrator tube. Add 4 mL of cyclohexane
and attach a two-ball micro-Snyder column.
Prewet the column by adding  0.5 mL  of
methylene chloride  to the top. Place  the
micro-K-D apparatus  on  a boiling (100 °C)
water bath so that the concentrator tube is
partially immersed in  the hot water. Adjust
the vertical position of the apparatus and
the water temperature as required to com-
plete  concentration  in 5  to 10 min. At the
proper rate of distillation the balls  of the
column will actively chatter but the cham-
bers will not flood. When the apparent vol-
ume of the liquid reaches 0.5 mL, remove the
K-D apparatus and allow it to drain and cool
for at  least 10 min. Remove the micro-Sny-
der column and rinse its lower joint into the
concentrator tube with a minimum amount
of cyclohexane. Adjust the extract volume to
about 2 mL.
  11.3  Silica gel column cleanup for PAHs:
  11.3.1 Prepare a slurry of 10 g of activiated
silica gel in methylene chloride and  place
this into a 10-mm ID  chromatographic col-
umn. Tap the column to settle the  silica gel
and elute the methylene chloride. Add 1 to 2
cm of anhydrous sodium sulfate to the top of
the silica gel.
  11.3.2 Preelute the column with  40 mL of
pentane. The rate for all  elutions should be
about 2 mL/min. Discard the eluate and just
prior to exposure of the sodium sulfate layer
to the air,  transfer the  2-mL cyclohexane
sample extract onto the column using an ad-
ditional 2 mL cyclohexane to complete the
transfer. Just prior to exposure of the so-
dium sulfate layer to the air, add  25 mL of
pentane and continue the  elution of the col-
umn. Discard this pentane eluate.
  11.3.3  Next, elute the column with 25 mL
of  methylene  chloride/pentane  (4+6XV/V)
into a  500-mL K-D flask equipped with a 10-
mL concentrator tube. Concentrate the col-
lected  fraction to less than 10 mL as in Sec-
tion 10.6. When the apparatus is cool, remove
the Snyder column and rinse the flask and
its lower joint with pentane. Proceed with
HPLC or GC analysis.

 12. High Performance Liquid Chromatography

  12.1   To the extract  in  the  concentrator
tube,  add 4 mL  of acetonitrile and  a new
boiling chip, then attach a two-ball micro-
Snyder column.  Concentrate the solvent as
in Section 10.6, except set the water bath at
95 to 100 °C. When the apparatus is cool, re-
move the micro-Snyder column and rinse its
lower joint into the concentrator tube with
about 0.2 mL of acetonitrile. Adjust the ex-
tract volume to 1.0 mL.
  12.2   Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating conditions for the HPLC.  Included
in this table are retention times,  capacity
factors, and MDL that can be achieved under
                                         158

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 610
these  conditions.  The  UV  detector  is rec-
ommended for the determination  of naph-
thalene, acenaphthylene, acenapthene, and
fluorene and the fluorescence detector is rec-
ommended for the remaining PAHs. Exam-
ples of the  separations achieved  by this
HPLC  column are shown in Figures 1 and 2.
Other HPLC columns, chromatographic con-
ditions, or detectors may be used if the re-
quirements of Section 8.2 are met.
  12.3  Calibrate  the system daily  as de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12.4  If  the  internal  standard calibration
procedure is being  used, the internal stand-
ard must be added to the sample extract and
mixed  thoroughly immediately before injec-
tion into the instrument.
  12.5  Inject 5 to 25 uL  of the sample extract
or standard into the HPLC using a high pres-
sure syringe or a constant volume sample in-
jection loop. Record the volume injected to
the nearest 0.1  uL, and the resulting  peak
size in area or peak height  units. Re-equili-
brate the HPLC column at the initial gra-
dient conditions for at  least 10 min between
injections.
  12.6  Identify the parameters in the sample
by  comparing the retention time  of the
peaks  in  the  sample  chromatogram  with
those   of    the    peaks    in    standard
chromatograms. The width  of the retention
time window  used to  make identifications
should be based upon  measurements of ac-
tual retention time variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three times the
standard deviation  of a retention time  for a
compound can be used to calculate a sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the  analyst should  weigh heavily in the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  12.7  If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range of the system, dilute the ex-
tract with acetonitrile and reanalyze.
  12.8  If the measurement  of the  peak re-
sponse is prevented by the presence of inter-
ferences, further cleanup is required.

          13. Gas Chromatography
  13.1  The packed column GC procedure will
not resolve  certain isomeric  pairs as  indi-
cated in Section 1.3 and Table 2. The liquid
chromatographic  procedure  (Section  12)
must be used for these parameters.
  13.2  To achieve maximum sensitivity with
this  method,  the  extract  must  be  con-
centrated to 1.0 mL. Add a clean boiling chip
to the methylene chloride extract in the con-
centrator tube. Attach a two-ball micro-Sny-
der column. Prewet the micro-Snyder col-
umn by adding  about  0.5 mL of methylene
chloride to the top. Place the micro-K-D ap-
paratus on a hot water bath (60 to  65 °C) so
that the concentrator  tube  is partially im-
mersed in the  hot water. Adjust the vertical
position of the apparatus and the water tem-
perature as  required  to complete  the  con-
centration in 5 to 10 min. At the proper rate
of distillation the balls will actively chatter
but the chambers will  not flood. When the
apparent volume of liquid reaches 0.5 mL, re-
move the  K-D  apparatus and  allow it to
drain and cool for at least 10 min. Remove
the micro-Snyder column and rinse its lower
joint into the concentrator tube with a min-
imum amount of methylene chloride. Adjust
the final volume to 1.0 mL and stopper the
concentrator tube.
  13.3  Table 2 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions   for  the  gas  chro-
matograph. Included in this table are reten-
tion times that were  obtained  under these
conditions.  An  example of the separations
achieved by this column is shown in Figure
3. Other packed  or capillary (open-tubular)
columns, chromatographic conditions, or de-
tectors  may be  used if the requirements of
Section 8.2 are met.
  13.4  Calibrate  the gas  chromatographic
system daily as described in Section 7.
  13.5  If the internal  standard  calibration
procedure is being used, the internal stand-
ard must be added to the sample extract and
mixed thoroughly immediately before injec-
tion into the gas chromatograph.
  13.6 Inject 2 to 5 \iL of the sample extract
or  standard into  the  gas  chromatograph
using the solvent-flush technique.10 Smaller
(1.0 uL) volumes  may  be  injected if auto-
matic devices are  employed. Record the vol-
ume injected to the nearest 0.05 nL, an(J the
resulting peak size in  area  or peak  height
units.
  13.7 Identify the parameters in the sample
by  comparing  the retention times  of  the
peaks  in  the sample  chromatogram  with
those   of    the    peaks   in   standard
chromatograms. The width of the retention
time window used to  make identifications
should be based upon  measurements of ac-
tual retention time variations of standards
over the course of a day. Three  times the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound  can be used to calculate  a  sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the  analyst should  weigh heavily in the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  13.8 If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range of the system, dilute the ex-
tract and reanalyze.
  13.9  If the measurement of the peak re-
sponse is prevented by  the  presence of inter-
ferences, further cleanup is required.

              14. Calculations

  14.1  Determine the concentration  of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  14.1.1  If  the external standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the amount of
material injected from the peak response
using  the  calibration  curve or  calibration
factor determined in Section 7.2.2. The  con-
centration  in the  sample can be calculated
from Equation 2.
                                         159

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 610
                           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
     Concentration (n.g/L) =
(A)(Vt)

(Vi)(Vs)
                                Equation 2
where:
A= Amount of material injected (ng).
V,=Volume of extract injected (|J.L).
V,=Volume of total extract (|j.L).
Vs= Volume of water extracted (mL).
  13.1.2  If the internal standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined  in  Section  7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.
                            (A
  Concentration (|J.g/L) =
                          .     ,        .
                         (Ais)(RF)(V0)
                                Equation 3

where:
As=Response  for the parameter to tie meas-
  ured.
Als=Response for the internal standard.
Is=Amount of  internal  standard added  to
  each extract (ng).
V0= Volume of water extracted (L).
  14.2  Report results in |ig/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          15. Method Performance
  15.1  The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.1  The  MDL  concentrations listed  in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.11
Similar  results were  achieved  using  rep-
resentative waste waters. MDL for the GC ap-
proach were not determined. The MDL actu-
ally achieved in a given analysis will  vary
depending on instrument sensitivity  and ma-
trix effects.
  15.2  This  method has  been tested for lin-
earity of spike recovery from reagent water
and has been demonstrated to be applicable
over the concentration range from 8 x MDL
to 800 x MDL11 with the following exception:
benzo(ghi)perylene recovery at 80 x and  800 x
MDL were low (35% and 45%, respectively).
  15.3  This  method was  tested by 16 labora-
tories  using reagent water, drinking water,
surface   water,   and   three    industrial
wastewaters  spiked at  six  concentrations
over the range 0.1 to 425 |ig/L.12 Single oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter and  es-
sentially independent of the sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 4.

               REFERENCES

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. "Determination of Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons  in Industrial  and Municipal
Wastewaters,"   EPA  600/4-82-025,  National
Technical Information Service, PB82-258799,
Springfield, Virginia 22161, June 1982.
  3. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constituents," American  So-
ciety for Testing and Materials, Philadel-
phia.
  4.  "Carcinogens—Working  With  Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare,  Public Health Service,  Center  for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational  Safety and Health, Publication  No.
77-206, August  1977.
  5.  "OSHA Safety and  Health  Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR part 1910), Occu-
pational  Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion, Committee on  Chemical  Safety,  3rd
Edition, 1979.
  7. Provost, L.P., and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation  of Percent Recovery Data," American
Laboratory, 15, 58-63 (1983).  (The value  2.44
used in the equation in Section 8.3.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  8.  ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31,  D3370-76. "Standard Practices for  Sam-
pling Water,"  American Society for  Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  9.  "Methods  330.4 (Titrimetric,  DPD-FAS)
and  330.5  (Spectrophotometric,  DPD)  for
Chlorine,  Total   Residual,"  Methods  for
Chemical Analysis of Water  and  Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020,  U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency,  Environmental Monitoring
and  Support  Laboratory,  Cincinnati, Ohio
45268, March 1979.
  10. Burke, J.A. "Gas Chromatography  for
Pesticide Residue Analysis; Some Practical
Aspeqts," Journal  of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, 48, 1037 (1965).
  11. Cole, T., Riggin, R., and  Glaser, J.
"Evaluation of Method Detection Limits  and
Analytical Curve  for  EPA Method  610—
PNAs,"    International   Symposium   on
Polynuclear Aromatic  Hydrocarbons,  5th,
Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories,  Colum-
bus, Ohio (1980).
  12. "EPA Method  Study  20, Method  610
(PNA's)," EPA 600/4-84-063,  National Tech-
nical  Information   Service,  PB84-211614,
Springfield, Virginia 22161, June 1984.
                                         160

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                Pt. 136, App. A,  Meth. 610
  TABLE  1—HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION
                                               LIMITS
Parameter
Naphthalene 	
Acenaphthylene . 	 	
Acenaphthene
Fluorene ....
Phenanthrene 	
Anthracene .
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene .
Chrysene .
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene . ..
Ben20{a)pyrene . ... 	 	 	
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(ghi)perylene ...
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Retention
time (mm)
166
18.5
205
21 2
221
234
245
254
285
293
31 6
329
33.9
357
363
374
Column
capacity
factor (k')
122
137
152
15.8
166
176
185
191
21 6
222
240
251
25.9
274
278
287
Method
detection
limit (ng/
1 8
23
1 8
021
064
066
021
027
0013
015
0018
0017
0.023
0030
0076
0043
  AAAHPLC column conditions Reverse phase HC-ODS Sil-X, 5 micron particle size, in a 25 cm x 2 6 mm ID stainless steel
column Isocratic elution for 5 mm using acetonitnle/water (4+6), then linear gradient elution to 100% acetonitrile over 25 mm  at
0 5 mL/min flow rate If columns having other internal diameters are used, the flow rate should be adjusted to maintain a linear
velocity of 2 mm/sec
  "The MDL for naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, and fluorene were determined using a UV detector All others
were determined using a fluorescence detector
 TABLE 2—GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
             AND RETENTION TIMES
TABLE 2—GAS CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
      AND RETENTION TIMES—Continued
Parameter
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene .
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene .
Anthracene
Fluoranthene . .
Pyrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene . ...
Benzofbjfluoranthene
Retention
time (mm)
45
104
108
126
159
159
198
206
247
247
280
Parameter
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Retention
time (mm)
280
294
362
362
386
                                                     GC Column conditions  Chromosorb W-AW-DCMS (100/
                                                   120 mesh) coated with 3% OV-17 packed in a 1 8 x 2 mm ID
                                                   glass column with nitrogen carrier gas at 40 mL/mm flow rate
                                                   Column temperature was held at 100°C for 4 mm , then pro-
                                                   grammed at 8 °C/mm  to a final hold at 280 °C
                        TABLE 3—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 610
Parameter
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluor-anthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluo-ranthene
Chrysene 	
Dibenzo(a,h)an-thracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene . ....
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene .. .
Naphthalene . ...
Phenanthrene .. . .
Pyrene . . . .
Test cone
(ug/L)
100
100
100
10
10
10
10
5
10
10
10
100
10
100
100
10
Limit for s
(H9/L)
403
451
287
40
40
31
23
25
42
20
30
430
3.0
407
377
34
Range for X
(H9/L)
D-1057
221-1121
11 2-1123
31-116
02-110
1 8-138
D-107
D-70
D-17.5
03-10.0
27-111
D-119
1 2-100
21 5-1000
84-1337
1 4-12 1
Range for
P, P, (%)
D-124
D-139
D-126
12-135
D-128
6-150
D-116
D-159
D-199
D-110
14-123
D-142
D-116
D-122
D-155
D-140
  5=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in ug/L (Section 824)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ug/L (Section 824)
  P, P,=Percent recovery measured (Section 832, Section 8 4.2)
  D=Detected; result must be greater than zero
  NOTE These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 4 Where necessary, the limits for recov-
ery have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 4
                                                161

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 610
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 TABLE 4—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 610
Parameter






Benzo(ghi)perylene 	 	 . 	 	







Pyrene 	
Accuracy, as
recovery, X'
(H9/L)
052C + 054
0 69C - 1 89
0.63C - 1.26
073C + 005
056C + 001
078C + 0.01
0.44C + 030
059C + 000
0.77C -0 18
0.41C + 0.11
068C + 007
0.56C - 0 52
054C + 006
0 57C - 0 70
0 72C - 0 95
0.69C - 0.12
Single analyst
precision, s/
(ng/L)
039X+076
036X+029
023X + 1 16
028X + 004
0 38X - 0 01
0.21 X + 0.01
025X + 004
0 44X - 0 00
032X-018
024X + 002
022X + 0.06
044X- 1 12
029X + 002
039X-0 18
0.29X + 005
025X + 014
Overall preci-
sion, S'
(H9/L)
0.53X + 1.32
042X + 052
041X + 0.45
034X + 002
0 53X - 0 01
0.38X - 0.00
058X+0.10
069X + 001
0.66X - 0.22
045X + 0.03
0.32X + 0.03
0.63X - 0.65
042X + 0.01
041X + 074
0 47X - 0 25
0.42X - 0 00
 X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in Lig/L
 sr'=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in jig/L
 S'=Expected mterlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in u.g/L
 C=True value for the concentration, in ng/L
 X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in jig/L
 COLUMN: HC-ODS SIL-X
 MOBILE PHASE: 40% TO 100% ACETONITRILE IN WATER
 DETECTOR: ULTRAVIOLET AT 254nm
                                   RETENTION TIME. WIN.

        Figure 1.   Liquid chromatogram of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons.
                                             162

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 610
 COLUMN: HC-ODS SIL-X
 MOBILE PHASE: 40KTO 100% ACETONITRILE
            IN WATER
 DETECTOR:  FLUORESCENCE
                             RETENTION TIME. MIN.

 Figure 2.  Liquid chromatogram of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons.
                                     163

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 611
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
     COLUMN: 3% OV-17 ON CH HOMO SORB W-AW-DCMS
     PROGRAM: 100°C FOR 4 MIN. 8°C/MIN TO 280°C
     DETECTOR: FLAME IONIZATION
                          &
                          o

                          \
    u> 3

    II
    £ *
    11
    "is
    §8
    ii
                     12
                            16
                                         24
                                                28
                                                              36
                                                                    40
                            RETENTION TIME, MIN.

 Figure  3.  Gas chromatogram  of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons.
         METHOD 611—HALOETHERS

          1. Scope and Application

  1.1  This method covers the determination
of certain haloethers. The following param-
eters can be determined by this method:
Parameter
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane ....
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether .
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl either
STORET
No
34273
34278
34283
34636
34641
CAS No.
111-44-4
111-91-1
108-60-1
101-55-3
7005-72-3
  1.2  This  is a  gas  chromatographic (GC)
method applicable to the  determination of
the compounds listed above in municipal and
industrial discharges  as provided under 40
CFR 136.1. When  this method is used to ana-
lyze unfamiliar samples for any or all of the
compounds above, compound identifications
should be supported  by at least  one addi-
tional  qualitative  technique. This  method
describes analytical conditions for a second
gas chromatographic  column  that  can be
used to confirm measurements made with
the primary column. Method 625 provides gas
chromatograph/mass  spectrometer  (GC/MS)
conditions  appropriate for the qualitative
and quantitative confirmation of results for
all of the parameters listed above,  using the
extract produced by this method.
  1.3 The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined in Section  14.1)1 for each parameter is
listed in Table 1.  The MDL  for a specific
wastewater may  differ from those listed, de-
pending upon the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.4 The sample extraction and concentra-
tion steps in this method are essentially the
same as  in Methods 606, 608,  609,  and 612.
Thus, a single sample may be extracted to
measure  the  parameters  included  in the
scope of each of these methods. When clean-
up is required, the concentration levels must
be high enough to permit selecting aliquots,
as necessary, to apply appropriate cleanup
procedures. The analyst is allowed the lati-
tude,   under   Section   12,   to   select
                                        164

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 611
chromatographic conditions appropriate for
the simultaneous measurement of combina-
tions of these parameters.
  1.5  Any modification  of  this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as a major modification  subject to
application and approval  of alternate test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.6  This method is restricted to use by or
under the supervision of  analysts  experi-
enced in the  use of a gas chromatograph and
in the interpretation  of gas chromatograms.
Each analyst must demonstrate the ability
to  generate  acceptable  results  with this
method using the procedure described in Sec-
tion 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A  measured  volume  of  sample,  ap-
proximately  1-L,  is  extracted with  meth-
ylene chloride using a separatory funnel. The
methylene chloride extract is  dried and ex-
changed to hexane during concentration to a
volume of 10 mL or less.  The extract is sepa-
rated by gas chromatography and the param-
eters are then  measured with a halide spe-
cific detector.2
  2.2  The method provides a Plorisil column
cleanup procedure to  aid in the elimination
of interferences that may be encountered.

               3. Interferences

  3.1  Method interferences  may  be caused
by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that  lead  to discrete artifacts and/or ele-
vated baselines in gas chromatograms. All of
these  materials  must  be   routinely dem-
onstrated to be free from interferences under
the conditions of the analysis by running
laboratory reagent blanks as described  in
Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1 Glassware   must  be  scrupulously
cleaned.3 Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
sible  after use  by rinsing with the last sol-
vent used in it. Solvent rinsing should be fol-
lowed be detergent  washing with hot water,
and  rinses with  tap water  and distilled
water. The glassware  should then be drained
dry, and heated in a muffle furnace at 400 °C
for 15 to 30 min. Some thermally stable ma-
terials, such  a PCBs, may not be eliminated
by this treatment. Solvent rinses with ace-
tone  and pesticide  quality hexane may  be
substituted for the muffle  furnace heating.
Thorough rinsing with such solvents usually
eliminates  PCB interference.  Volumetric
ware  should  not be heated in  a muffle fur-
nace. After  drying and cooling,  glassware
should be sealed and stored in a clean envi-
ronment to  prevent  any accumulation  of
dust or other contaminants. Store inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2 The use of high purity reagents and
solvents helps to minimize interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required.
  3.2  Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are co-extracted from the
sample. The extent of matrix interferences
will vary considerably  from source to source,
depending upon the nature  and diversity of
the industrial complex or municipality being
sampled. The cleanup  procedure in Section
11 can be used to overcome many of these
interferences, but unique samples may re-
quire  additional   cleanup   approaches  to
achieve the MDL listed in Table 1.
  3.3  Dichlorobenzenes   are   known   to
coelute with haloethers under  some  gas
chromatographic conditions. If these mate-
rials  are  present  together  in a sample, it
may  be necessary to  analyze the extract
with two different column packings to com-
pletely resolve all of the compounds.

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity or  carcinogenicity  of
each  reagent used in  this method  has  not
been precisely defined; however,  each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard.  From this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The  laboratory is responsible for
maintaining  a  current awareness file  of
OSHA regulations  regarding the safe  han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be  made available to all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional references  to  laboratory safety
are available and have been  identified4-6 for
the information of the  analyst.

         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling equipment,  for  discrete  or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1 Grab sample  bottle—1-L  or   1-qt,
amber glass, fitted with a  screw cap lined
with Teflon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If amber
bottles are  not available, protect  samples
from light. The bottle  and cap liner must be
washed, rinsed with acetone or methylene
chloride, and dried before use to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2 Automatic  sampler  (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample con-
tainers for the collection of a minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4 °C and protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic pump, a  minimum length of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may be
used.  Before  use, however, the compressible
tubing  should  be  thoroughly rinsed with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize the potential for
contamination of the sample. An  integrating
                                          165

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 611
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All specifications are sug-
gested.  Catalog numbers are included for il-
lustration only.):
  5.2.1  Separatory funnel—2-L, with Teflon
stopcock.
  5.2.2  Drying    column—Chromatographic
column, approximately 400 mm long x 19 mm
ID, with coarse frit filter disc.
  5.2.3  Chromatographic   column—400 mm
long x 19  mm ID,  with Teflon stopcock and
coarse frit filter disc  at bottom (Kontes K-
420540-0224 or equivalent).
  5.2.4  Concentrator  tube,  Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL,  graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration must be checked
at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass stopper is used to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.5  Evaporative flask, Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL  (Kontes K-570001-0500  or equivalent).
Attach  to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.6  Snyder  column,   Kuderna-Danish—
Three-ball macro  (Kontes K-503000-0121  or
equivalent).
  5.2.7  Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.3  Boiling   chips—Approximately  10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C for 30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water bath—Heated, with concentric
ring cover,  capable of temperature  control
(±2°C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5  Balance—Analytical, capable of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.6  Gas   chromatograph—An   analytical
system  complete with  temperature program-
mable gas chromatograph suitable  for on-
column injection and all required accessories
including  syringes,  analytical   columns,
gases, detector, and strip-chart recorder.  A
data system is recommended for measuring
peak areas.
  5.6.1  Column 1—1.8 m  long x  2 mm  ID
glass, packed  with 3% SP-1000 on Supelco-
port (100/120 mesh) or equivalent.  This col-
umn was used to  develop  the method per-
formance statements  in Section  14. Guide-
lines  for  the  use  of  alternate   column
packings are provided in Section 12.1.
  5.6.2  Column 2—1.8 m  long x  2 mm  ID
glass,  packed with  2,6-diphenylene oxide
polymer (60/80 mesh), Tenax, or equivalent.
  5.6.3  Detector—Halide  specific  detector:
electrolytic  conductivity  or  microcoulo-
metric.  These  detectors have proven effec-
tive in  the  analysis of wastewaters  for the
parameters listed  in the scope (Section 1.1).
The Hall  conductivity detector was used to
develop the  method performance statements
in Section 14. Guidelines for the use of alter-
nate detectors are provided in Section 12.1.
Although less selective, an electron capture
detector is an acceptable alternative.
                6. Reagents
  6.1  Reagent  water—Reagent water is de-
fined as a water in which an interferent  is
not observed at the MDL of the  parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS)  Granular.
  6.3  Acetone, hexane, methanol, methylene
chloride, petroleum ether (boiling range 30-
60 °C)—Pesticide quality or equivalent.
  6.4  Sodium sulfate—(ACS) Granular, an-
hydrous. Purify by heating at 400 °C for 4 h
in a shallow tray.
  6.5  Florisil—PR Grade (60/100 mesh). Pur-
chase activated at 1250 °F and store in the
dark  in glass containers with ground  glass
stoppers or foil-lined screw caps.  Before use,
activate each batch at least 16 h  at 130 °C  in
a  foil-covered glass container and allow  to
cool.
  6.6  Ethyl ether—Nanograde, redistilled  in
glass if necessary.
  6.6.1 Ethyl ether must be shown to be free
of peroxides before it is used as indicated by
EM Laboratories  Quant test strips.  (Avail-
able  from  Scientific Products Co., Cat. No.
P1126-8, and other suppliers.)
  6.6.2 Procedures  recommended   for re-
moval of peroxides are provided with the test
strips. After cleanup, 20 mL of ethyl  alcohol
preservative must be added to each  liter  of
ether.
  6.7  Stock standard solutions (1.00 jig/nL)—
Stock standard solutions can be  prepared
from  pure standard materials or purchased
as certified solutions.
  6.7.1 Prepare  stock standard solutions by
accurately weighing about  0.0100 g of pure
material.  Dissolve the material  in acetone
and dilute to volume in  a 10-mL volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity  is  assayed to  be 96% or greater, the
weight can be used without correction to cal-
culate the concentration of the stock stand-
ard.  Commercially prepared stock standards
can be used at any concentration if they are
certified by the  manufacturer or  by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.7.2 Transfer  the  stock  standard  solu-
tions into Teflon-sealed  screw-cap bottles.
Store at 4 °C and protect from light. Stock
standard  solutions  should  be  checked fre-
quently for signs of degradation or evapo-
ration,  especially  just  prior to preparing
calibration standards from them.
  6.7.3 Stock standard solutions  must be re-
placed after  six months, or sooner if  com-
parison with  check standards  indicates  a
problem.
  6.8  Quality control  check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7.  Calibration

  7.1  Establish  gas  Chromatographic  oper-
ating conditions equivalent to those given in
Table 1. The gas Chromatographic  system
                                          166

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
                                        Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 611
 can be calibrated using the external standard
 technique (Section 7.2) or the internal stand-
 ard technique (Section 7.3).
  7.2  External  standard calibration proce-
 dure:
  7.2.1  Prepare calibration standards  at a
 minimum of three concentration levels  for
 each  parameter of interest  by adding vol-
 umes of one or more stock standards to a
 volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
 hexane. One of the external standards should
 be  at a concentration near, but above, the
 MDL (Table 1) and the other concentrations
 should correspond to the expected range of
 concentrations  found in  real  samples  or
 should define the working range of the detec-
 tor.
  7.2.2  Using injections  of 2 to 5 nL, analyze
 each calibration standard according to Sec-
 tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area  re-
 sponses against the mass injected.  The  re-
 sults can be used to  prepare a calibration
 curve for each  compound. Alternatively, if
 the  ratio of  response  to amount  injected
 (calibration factor) is a constant  over the
 working range (<10%  relative standard devi-
 ation, RSD), linearity through the origin can
 be assumed and the average ratio or calibra-
 tion factor can be used in place  of a calibra-
 tion curve.
  7.3  Internal  standard  calibration proce-
 dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
 select one or more internal standards that
 are similar in  analytical behavior  to  the
 compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
 ther demonstrate  that the measurement of
 the  internal  standard is not  affected  by
 method or matrix interferences. Because of
 these limitations, no internal standard can
 be suggested that is  applicable to all sam-
 ples.
  7.3.1  Prepare  calibration standards at a
 minimum of three concentration levels for
 each parameter of interest by  adding vol-
 umes of one or more  stock standards  to a
 volumetric flask. To each calibration stand-
 ard, add a known constant amount of one or
 more internal standards, and dilute to vol-
 ume with hexane.  One  of  the  standards
 should be at a concentration near, but above,
 the  MDL  and the  other  concentrations
should correspond to  the expected range of
concentrations  found  in  real  samples  or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
  7.3.2  Using injections of 2 to 5 (iL, analyze
each calibration standard according to  Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponses  against concentration for each com-
pound and internal standard. Calculate re-
sponse factors (RF) for each compound using
Equation 1.
             RF =
(AS)(CIS)
(AIS)(CS)
                                Equation 1
where:
A s=Response for the parameter to be
  measured.
A,s=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration of the internal  standard
  (Hg/L).
Cs=Concentration  of the parameter  to  be
  measured (ng/L).
If the RF value over the working range is a
constant (<10% RSD), the RF can be assumed
to be invariant and the average RF  can be
used for calculations. Alternatively,  the re-
sults can be used to plot a calibration curve
of response ratios, As/A,,, vs. RF.
  7.4  The  working  calibration curve, cali-
bration factor,  or RF  must be  verified  on
each working day by the measurement of one
or  more calibration standards.  If  the re-
sponse  for any parameter  varies from the
predicted response by more than ±15%, a new
calibration curve must  be prepared for that
compound.
  7.5  The  cleanup procedure in Section 11
utilizes  Florisil  column  chromatography.
Florisil  from  different batches  or  sources
may vary in adsorptive capacity. To stand-
ardize the amount of Florisil which is used,
the use  of lauric  acid  value7  is suggested.
The referenced procedure determines  the ad-
sorption from hexane solution of lauric acid
(mg) per g of Florisil. The amount of Florisil
to be used for each column is calculated by
dividing 110 by this ratio and multiplying by
20 g.
  7.6  Before  using any cleanup procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date elution patterns  and  the  absence  of
interferences from the reagents.

             8. Quality  Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to  operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The  minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory  capability and  an ongoing
analysis of spiked samples  to  evaluate and
document data quality.  The  laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks are compared with  established per-
formance criteria to determine  if the  results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of  sample
spikes  indicate atypical method perform-
ance, a quality control check standard must
be analyzed to  confirm that the measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1  The  analyst must make  an  initial,
one-time, demonstration  of the  ability to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
                                         167

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 611
           40 CFR Ch.  I (7-1-04 Edition)
  8.1.2  In recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.4, 11.1, and 12.1) to improve the sepa-
rations or lower  the  cost of measurements.
Each time such  a modification is made to
the method, the analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3  Before processing any samples,  the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate that  interferences from the
analytical system and  glassware  are under
control. Each time a set of samples is ex-
tracted or reagents are changed,  a reagent
water  blank must be processed  as a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4  The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike  and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality. This  procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5  The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is  described in Section
8.4. The frequency of  the  check standard
analyses is equivalent to 10% of all samples
analyzed but may be  reduced  if spike recov-
eries  from  samples   (Section 8.3)  meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6  The  laboratory must  maintain per-
formance  records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish  the ability to generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing each pa-
rameter of interest at a concentration of 100
)ig/mL  in acetone. The QC check sample con-
centrate must be obtained from the U.S. En-
vironmental  Protection  Agency,  Environ-
mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
in Cincinnati, Ohio, if available. If not avail-
able from that source, the QC check sample
concentrate must be  obtained from another
external source. If not available from either
source  above,  the  QC check sample  con-
centrate must be prepared by  the laboratory
using  stock standards  prepared  independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet, prepare  QC check sam-
ples at a concentration of 100  ug/L by adding
1.00 mL of QC  check sample concentrate to
each of four 1-L aliquots of reagent water
  8 2.3   Analyze  the  well-mixed  QC  check
samples according to the method beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4   Calculate the  average recovery (X) in
M.g/L, and the standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in |j.g/L, for each parameter using
the four results.
  8.2.5   For  each  parameter compare s and X
with the  corresponding acceptance criteria
for  precision  and accuracy, respectively,
found in Table 2. If s and X for all param-
eters  of interest meet the acceptance  cri-
teria, the system performance  is acceptable
and analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any individual s exceeds the precision limit
or any  individual X falls outside the range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter. Locate  and
correct  the source of the problem and repeat
the test for all parameters of interest begin-
ning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The  laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike at least 10% of the  samples from
each sample site being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing  one to
ten samples per month, at least one  spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1.  The  concentration  of  the spike in
the sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If, as  in  compliance monitoring,
the concentration of a specific  parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit, the spike  should
be at  that limit or 1 to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If  the  concentration  of a specific
parameter  in  the  sample  is  not   being
checked against a limit specific  to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at 100 |ig/L  or 1
to 5 times higher than the background con-
centration  determined  in  Section  8.3.2,
whichever concentration would  be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If  it is impractical  to  determine
background levels before spiking (e.g., max-
imum holding times will be exceeded),  the
spike concentration should be  (1) the regu-
latory concentration limit, if any; or, if none
(2) the  larger of either 5 times higher than
the expected  background  concentration or
100 jig/L.
  8.3.2  Analyze  one sample aliquot to deter-
mine  the background concentration  (B) of
each parameter. If  necessary, prepare a  new
QC check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate for  the background concentra-
tions  in the sample. Spike a second sample
aliquot  with 1.0  mL of the QC  check sample
concentrate and analyze it to determine the
concentration after spiking (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100(A-B)%/T,  where T is the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with the corresponding QC
acceptance  criteria found in Table 2. These
acceptance  criteria were calculated  to in-
clude an allowance  for error in  measurement
of both  the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming  a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent  that the analyst's spike  to  back-
ground  ratio approaches 5.1.8 If spiking  was
performed at a concentration lower than 100
ug/L, the analyst must use either the QC ac-
ceptance criteria in Table 2, or optional QC
                                          168

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 611
 acceptance criteria calculated  for the  spe-
 cific  spike concentration. To calculate op-
 tional acceptance criteria for the recovery of
 a parameter:  (1)  Calculate accuracy  (X')
 using the  equation in Table 3, substituting
 the spike  concentration (T) for C; (2)  cal-
 culate overall precision (S')  using the equa-
 tion in Table 3, substituting  X' for X; (3) cal-
 culate the  range for recovery at the spike
 concentration as (100 XVT)±2.44(100 S7T)%.8
  8.3.4 If any individual P falls outside the
 designated  range for recovery,  that param-
 eter  has  failed the acceptance criteria. A
 check standard containing  each parameter
 that  failed the criteria must be analyzed as
 described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
 criteria for recovery  in Section 8.3,  a QC
 check standard containing  each parameter
 that failed must be  prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
 ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
 the number of parameters  being simulta-
 neously tested, the  complexity of the sample
 matrix, and the  performance of the labora-
 tory.
  8.4.1 Prepare  the QC check  standard by
 adding 1.0  m/L  of QC  check sample  con-
 centrate (Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L of  rea-
 gent  water. The QC  check  standard needs
 only  to contain  the parameters that failed
 criteria in  the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2 Analyze  the QC check  standard to
 determine  the concentration  measured (A) of
 each  parameter.  Calculate each percent re-
 covery (P,) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
 value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3 Compare  the  percent recovery  (Ps)
 for each parameter with the corresponding
 QC acceptance criteria found  in Table 2. Only
 parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
 need  to be  compared with these criteria. If
 the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
 side  the designated range,  the laboratory
 performance for that parameter is judged to
 be out of control, and the problem must be
 immediately identified and  corrected.   The
 analytical  result for that  parameter in the
 unspiked sample  is suspect and may not be
 reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the  lab-
 oratory,  method accuracy  for wastewater
 samples must be assessed and records must
be maintained.  After  the analysis of  five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate the average  percent recovery (P)
and the standard  deviation of the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent recovery interval from P-2sp to
P+2sp. If P=90% and sp=10%, for example, the
accuracy interval is  expressed as 70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on a regular  basis (e.g. after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6  It is  recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this method. The specific prac-
 tices that are most productive depend upon
 the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
 the  samples. Field duplicates may be ana-
 lyzed to assess the precision of the environ-
 mental  measurements.  When doubt  exists
 over the identification of a  peak on the
 chromatogram,   confirmatory  techniques
 such as  gas  chromatography  with a  dis-
 similar column, specific element detector, or
 mass spectrometer must be used. Whenever
 possible,  the  laboratory  should  analyze
 standard reference materials and participate
 in relevant performance evaluation studies.

     9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1 Grab  samples  must  be  collected in
 glass  containers.  Conventional   sampling
 practices9 should be followed, except that the
 bottle must not be prerinsed with sample be-
 fore collection. Composite samples should be
 collected in refrigerated glass containers in
 accordance with the requirements of the pro-
 gram. Automatic sampling equipment must
 be as free as  possible of Tygon tubing and
 other potential sources of contamination.
  9.2 All samples  must be  iced  or refrig-
 erated at 4 °C from  the time of  collection
 until extraction. Fill  the sample bottles and,
 if residual chlorine is present, add 80 mg of
 sodium thiosulfate per liter of sample  and
 mix well. EPA Methods 330.4  and 330.5 may
 be used  for measurement  of  residual chlo-
 rine.10 Field test kits are available for this
 purpose.
  9.3  All samples must be extracted within 7
 days of collection and completely analyzed
 within 40 days of extraction.2

            10. Sample Extraction

  10.1  Mark the water meniscus on the side
 of the sample bottle for later  determination
 of sample volume. Pour the  entire sample
 into a 2-L separatory funnel.
  10.2  Add 60 mL methylene chloride to the
 sample bottle, seal, and shake 30  s  to rinse
 the inner surface. Transfer the solvent to the
 separatory funnel and extract the sample by
 shaking  the funnel for 2 min with  periodic
 venting to release excess pressure. Allow the
 organic  layer to separate from the water
 phase for a minimum of 10 min. If the emul-
 sion interface between layers is more than
 one-third the  volume of the  solvent layer,
 the analyst must  employ mechanical  tech-
 niques to complete the phase separation. The
 optimum technique depends upon the sam-
 ple,  but  may include stirring, filtration of
 the emulsion through glass wool, centrifuga-
 tion, or other physical methods. Collect the
methylene chloride extract in  a 250-mL Er-
lenmeyer flask.
  10.3 Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
ylene chloride to the sample bottle and re-
peat the  extraction procedure a second time,
combining the  extracts in the Erlenmeyer
                                         169

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 611
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
manner.
  10.4  Assemble  a  Kuderna-Danish (K-D)
concentrator by attaching a 10-mL concen-
trator tube to a 500-mL  evaporative flask.
Other  concentration  devices  or  techniques
may be  used in place  of the K-D concen-
trator if the  requirements of Section 8.2 are
met.
  10.5  Pour the combined extract through a
solvent-rinsed  drying-  column  containing
about  10  cm of anhydrous sodium sulfate,
and collect the extract in the K-D concen-
trator. Rinse the Erlenmeyer flask and col-
umn with 20  to 30 mL of methylene chloride
to complete the quantitative transfer.
  10.6  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
the evaporative flask and attach a three-ball
Snyder column. Prewet the Snyder column
by adding about 1 mL of methylene chloride
to the top. Place the K-D  apparatus on a hot
water bath (60  to 65 °C) so that the concen-
trator tube is partially  immersed  in the hot
water, and the entire lower rounded surface
of the flask is bathed with hot vapor. Adjust
the vertical  position of the apparatus  and
the water  temperature  as required to com-
plete  the concentration in 15 to  20 min. At
the proper rate of distillation the balls of the
column will  actively chatter but  the cham-
bers will not flood with condensed solvent.
When the apparent  volume of liquid reaches
1 mL, remove the K-D apparatus and allow it
to drain and cool for at least 10 min.
  NOTE:  Some  of  the haloethers  are  very
volatile and  significant losses will occur in
concentration steps if care is not exercised.
It is  important to  maintain  a  constant
gentle evaporation rate and not to allow the
liquid volume to fall below 1 to 2  mL before
removing the K-D  apparatus from the  hot
water bath.
  10.7  Momentarily remove the Snyder col-
umn,  add 50 mL of hexane and a new boiling
chip, and reattach the Snyder column. Raise
the temperature of the water bath to 85 to 90
°C. Concentrate the extract  as  in Section
10.6, except use hexane to prewet the column.
The elapsed time of concentration should be
5 to 10 min.
  10.8  Remove the  Snyder column and rinse
the flask and its lower joint into the concen-
trator tube with 1 to 2 mL of hexane. A 5-mL
syringe is  recommended for this  operation.
Stopper the concentrator tube and store re-
frigerated  if further processing will not be
performed  immediately. If the extract will
be stored longer than two days, it should be
transferred to a Teflon-sealed screw-cap vial.
If the sample  extract  requires  no further
cleanup,  proceed with gas chromatographic
analysis  (Section 12). If the sample requires
further cleanup, proceed to Section 11.
  10.9  Determine the  original sample vol-
ume by  refilling the sample bottle to  the
mark and  transferring the  liquid to a  1000-
mL graduated  cylinder.  Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5 mL.

         11. Cleanup and  Separation

  11.1  Cleanup procedures may not be nec-
essary for a relatively clean sample matrix.
If particular circumstances demand the use
of a cleanup procedure, the analyst may use
the procedure below or any other appropriate
procedure. However, the analyst first must
demonstrate  that  the requirements of Sec-
tion  8.2 can be met using the method as re-
vised to incorporate the cleanup procedure.
  11.2  Florisil     column    cleanup    for
haloethers:
  11.2.1  Adjust the  sample extract volume
to 10 mL.
  11.2.2  Place  a  weight of  Florisil  (nomi-
nally 20 g)  predetermined  by calibration
(Section 7.5), into a chromatographic col-
umn.  Tap the column to settle the Florisil
and add 1 to 2  cm of anhydrous sodium sul-
fate to the top.
  11.2.3  Preelute the column with 50 to 60
mL of petroleum  ether.  Discard the eluate
and just prior to exposure of the sodium sul-
fate layer to the air, quantitatively transfer
the sample extract onto the column by de-
cantation and  subsequent petroleum  ether
washings. Discard the eluate. Just prior to
exposure of the sodium sulfate layer to the
air, begin eluting the column with 300 mL of
ethyl ether/petroleum ether (6+94)  OV7V). Ad-
just the elution rate to approximately 5 mlV
min and collect the  eluate in a 500-mL K-D
flask  equipped with  a  10-mL concentrator
tube. This fraction should contain all of the
haloethers.
  11.2.4  Concentrate the fraction  as in Sec-
tion  10.6,  except  use hexane  to prewet the
column. When the apparatus is cool, remove
the Snyder column and  rinse the flask and
its lower joint into the concentrator  tube
with  hexane.  Adjust the  volume of  the
cleaned up extract to 10 mL with hexane and
analyze by gas  chromatography (Section 12).

          12. Gas Chromatography

  12.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions  for  the  gas  chro-
matograph. Included in this table  are reten-
tion  times and MDL that can be achieved
under these conditions. Examples of the sep-
arations achieved by Columns 1  and 2 are
shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Other
packed or capillary  (open-tubular) columns,
chromatographic   conditions,  or  detectors
may be used if the requirements of Section
8.2 are met.
  12.2  Calibrate  the system  daily as de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12.3  If the internal standard calibration
procedure is  being used,  the internal stand-
ard must be added to the sample extract and
mixed thoroughly  immediately before injec-
tion into the gas chromatrograph.
                                         170

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 611
  12.4  Inject 2 to 5 nL of the sample extract
or  standard into  the  gas  chromatograph
using the solvent-flush  technique." Smaller
(1.0  jiL)  volumes may  be  injected if auto-
matic devices are employed. Record the vol-
ume injected to the nearest 0.05 jiL, the total
extract volume, and the resulting peak size
in area or peak height units.
  12.5  Identify the parameters in the sample
by  comparing  the  retention times  of  the
peaks  in the  sample  chromatogram with
those    of    the   peaks    in    standard
chromatograms. The width of the retention
time window  used  to make  identifications
should be based  upon measurements of ac-
tual retention  time variations of standards
over the course  of a day. Three times  the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound can be used to calculate  a  sug-
gested window  size; however, the experience
of the analyst  should weight  heavily in  the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  12.6 If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range  of the system, dilute the ex-
tract and reanalyze.
  12.7  If the measurement of the  peak re-
sponse is prevented by the  presence of inter-
ferences, further cleanup is required.

              13. Calculations
  13.1 Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  13.1.1  If the external  standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate  the  amount of
material injected from  the  peak  response
using the calibration  curve or calibration
factor determined in Section 7.2.2. The con-
centration in the sample can be calculated
from Equation 2.
     Concentration (Hg/L) =
                             (A)(Vt)
                                Equation 2
where:
A=Amount of material injected (ng).
V,=Volume of extract injected (|iL).
V,=Volume of total extract (jiL).
Vs=Volume of water extracted (mL).
  13.1.2  If the internal  standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the  concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RF) determined in  Section 7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.
 Concentration (|J,g/L) =
                         (Ais)(RF)(V0)

                                Equation 3
where:
As=Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,,=Response for the internal standard.
Is=Amount  of  internal  standard added  to
  each extract (ng).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2  Report results in p.g/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          14. Method Performance
  14.1  The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.1  The  MDL  concentrations listed  in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.12
Similar  results were achieved  using  rep-
resentative waste waters. The MDL actually
achieved in a given  analysis will vary de-
pending  on  instrument sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2  This  method has been tested for lin-
earity of spike  recovery from reagent water
and has been demonstrated to be applicable
over the concentration range from 4 x MDL
to 1000 x MDL.12
  14.3  This  method was tested by 20 labora-
tories  using reagent water, drinking water,
surface   water,    and   three    industrial
wastewaters  spiked at  six  concentrations
over the range  1.0 to 626  u/L.12 Single  oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration of  the  parameter and es-
sentially independent of the  sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 3.

               REFERENCES

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. "Determination of Haloethers in Indus-
trial and Municipal Wastewaters," EPA 600/4-
81-062, National Technical Information Serv-
ice, PB81-232290, Springfield, Virginia 22161,
July 1981.
  3. ASTM Annual  Book of Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample  Containers and for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constitutents," American So-
ciety for Testing  and Materials, Philadel-
phia.
  4.  "Carcinogens—Working  Carcinogens, "
Department of Health, Education, and Wel-
fare, Public  Health Services, Center for Dis-
ease Control, National Institute  for Occupa-
tional Safety and Health, Publication No. 77-
206, August 1977.
  5. "OSHA  Safety and  Health  Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR part  1910), Occu-
pational Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry  Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion,  Committee on  Chemical  Safety, 3rd
Edition, 1979.
  7. Mills., P.A. "Variation of Florisil Activ-
ity: Simple Method for Measuring Absorbent
Capacity  and  Its Use   in  Standardizing
                                         171

-------
Pt. 136, App. A,  Meth. 611
            40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Plorisll Columns," Journal of the Association
of Official Analytical Chemists, 51, 29 (1968).
  8.  Provost, L.P., and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation  of Percent Recovery Data," American
Laboratory,  15,  58-63  (1983). (The  value 2.44
used in the equation in Section 8.3.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  9.  ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3370-76.  "Standard Practices for  Sam-
pling Water," American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  10. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetric, DPD-FAS)
and  330.5  (Spectrophotometric,   DPD)  for
Chlorine,  Total   Residual,"   Methods  for
Chemical Analysis  of  Water and  Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020,  U.S.  Environmental  Pro-
tection  Agency, Environmental  Monitoring
and Support  Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  Ohio
45268, March 1979.
  11.  Burke, J.A. "Gas Chromatography  for
Pesticide Residue  Analysis; Some Practical
Aspects," Journal of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, 48, 1037 (1965).
  12.  "EPA  Method  Study  21,  Method 611,
Haloethers," EPA 600/4-84-052, National Tech-
nical   Information   Service,   PB84-205939,
Springfield, Virginia 22161, June 1984.
            TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHODS DETECTION LIMITS




Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
4-Chlorophenyl ether . . ....
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether . ... . .
Retention time (mm)

Column 1
84
93
131
194
21 2
Column 2
97
9 1
10.0
150
162
Method

limit (u/L)
08
03
0.5
39
23
  AColumn 1 conditions Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) coated with 3% SP-1000 packed in a 1.8 m long x 2 mm ID glass column
with helium carrier gas at 40 mL/mm. flow rate. Column temperature held at 60 °C for 2 min  after injection then programmed at
8 °C/min  to 230 °C and held for 4 mm Under these conditions the retention time for Aldrm is 22 6 mm
  AColumn 2 conditions Tenax-GC (60/80 mesh) packed in a 1 8 m long x 2mm ID glass column with helium carrier gas at 40
mL/mm. flow rate. Column temperature held at 150 °C for 4 mm after injection then programmed at 16 °C/min to 310 °C Under
these conditions the retention time for Aldrm is 18.4 mm

                       TABLE 2—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 611
Parameter
Bis (2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis (2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis {2-chloroisopropyl)ether
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether . .
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether . 	
Test cone
(ng/L)
100
100
100
100
100
Limit for s
(ng/L)
263
257
327
393
307
Range for X
(ng/L)
263-1368
273-1150
26.4-1470
76-1675
154-1525
Range for
P, Ps per-
cent
11-152
12-128
9-165
D-189
D-170
  s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in u.g/L (Section 8.2 4)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in |ig/L (Section 824)
  P, Ps=Percent recovery measured (Section 8 3.2, Section 842)
  D=Detected, result must be greater than zero.
  NOTE These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 3 Where necessary, the limits for recov-
ery have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3

  TABLE 3—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 611
Parameter
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether . 	
Bis(2-chlorotsopropyl) ether
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether .... . . ..
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether . . .
Accuracy, as
recovery, X'
(ng/L)
081C+054
071C+0 13
0 85C+1 67
0 85C+2 55
0 82C+1 97
Single analyst
precision, s/
(ng/L)
019X+028
020X+0 15
0 20X+1 05
0 25X+0 21
0 18X+2 13
Overall preci-
sion, S' (ug/L)
0.35X+0.36
0 33X+0 1 1
0 36X+0 79
0 47X+0 37
041X+055
  X' = Expected recovery for one or more measuremelts of a sample containing a concentration of C, in ug/L
  sr' = Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ug/L
  S' = Expected mterlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, m ug/L
  C =True value for the concentration, m ug/L
  X = Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, m ug/L
                                               172

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                        Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 611
 COLUMN:  3% SP-1000 ON SUPELCOPORT
 PROGRAM  60°C FOR 2 MIN. 8°C/MIN TO 230°C
 DETECTOR: HALL ELECTROLYTIC CONDUCTIVITY
                   UJ
                      •  £
                                             z  o
                                               "
02    4    6    8    10   12   14   16  18

                  RETENTION TIME, MIN.

Figure 1.  Gas chromatogram of haloethers.
                                                20   22   24
                            173

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
     COLUMN:  TENAX GC
     PROGRAM: 150°C FOR 4 MIN.  16°C/MIN TO 310°C
     DETECTOR: HALL ELECTROLYTIC CONDUCTIVITY
                           cc
                           LU
         LU
  »**
 048          12         16        20

                    RETENTION TIME, MIN.

  Figure 2.  Gas chromatogram of haloethers.
                 24
 METHOD 612—CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS

        1. Scope and Application
 1.1  This method covers the determination
of certain chlorinated hydrocarbons. The fol-
lowing parameters can be determined by this
method:
Parameter
2-Chloronaphthalene 	
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene . ..
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene 	
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene . ...
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene . .
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane .
STORET
No
34581
34536
34566
34571
39700
34391
34386
34396
CAS No
91-58-7
95-50-1
541-73-1
106-46-7
118-74-1
87-68-3
77^t7-4
67-72-1
                                174

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
Parameter
1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
STORE!
No
34551
CAS No
120-82-1
  1.2  This  is a  gas chromatographic (GC)
method applicable to the determination of
the compounds listed above in municipal and
industrial  discharges  as  provided under 40
CPR 136.1.  When  this method is used to ana-
lyze unfamiliar samples for any or all  of the
compounds above, compound identifications
should be  supported by at  least one addi-
tional qualitative  technique.  This method
describes a second gas chromatographic col-
umn that  can be used to  confirm measure-
ments made with the primary column.  Meth-
od  625  provides  gas  chromatograph/mass
spectrometer   (GC/MS)  conditions  appro-
priate for  the  qualitative and  quantitative
confirmation of results for all of the param-
eters listed above,  using  the  extract pro-
duced by this method.
  1.3  The method detection  limit (MDL, de-
fined in Section 14.1)1 for each parameter is
listed in Table 1.  The MDL for a specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending- upon the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.4  The  sample extraction and concentra-
tion steps in this method are essentially the
same as in Methods 606,  608,  609, and 611.
Thus, a single  sample may  be  extracted to
measure the  parameters  included in  the
scope of each of these methods. When clean-
up is required, the concentration levels must
be high enough to permit selecting aliquots,
as necessary, to  apply appropriate  cleanup
procedures. The analyst  is allowed the lati-
tude,    under   Section   12,    to    select
chromatographic conditions  appropriate for
the simultaneous measurement of combina-
tions of these parameters.
  1.5  Any  modification of this method,  be-
yond those expressly permitted,  shall be con-
sidered  as  a major modification subject  to
application and approval  of alternate test
procedures  under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.6  This  method is restricted to use by or
under the   supervision of analysts experi-
enced in the use of a gas chromatogrraph and
in the interpretation of gas chromatograms.
Each  analyst must demonstrate the ability
to generate acceptable  results with  this
method using the procedure described in Sec-
tion 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A measured  volume  of  sample,  ap-
proximately 1-L,  is  extracted  with meth-
ylene chloride using a separatory funnel. The
methylene  chloride extract is dried and  ex-
changed to  hexane during concentration to a
volume of 10 mL or less. The  extract is sepa-
rated by gas chromatography and the param-
eters  are then measured with  an electron
capture detector.2
  2.2  The method provides a Plorisil column
 cleanup procedure to aid in the elimination
 of interferences that may be encountered.

               3. Interferences

  3.1  Method interferences may  be caused
 by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glass-
 ware, and other sample processing hardware
 that  lead to discrete artifacts  and/or  ele-
 vated baselines in gas chromatograms. All of
 these  materials  must  be  routinely dem-
 onstrated to be free from interferences under
 the conditions of the analysis by  running
 laboratory  reagent  blanks  as described in
 Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1 Glassware  must  be  scrupulously
 cleaned.3  Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
 sible  after use by rinsing with the  last  sol-
 vent used in it. Solvent rinsing- should be fol-
 lowed by  detergent washing with hot water,
 and  rinses   with tap water and  distilled
 water. The glassware should then be drained
 dry, and heated in a muffle furnace at 400 °C
 for 15 to 30  min.  Some thermally stable ma-
 terials, such as PCBs, may not be eliminated
 by this treatment.  Solvent  rinses with ace-
 tone and  pesticide quality hexane  may be
 substituted  for the muffle furnace  heating.
 Thorough rinsing with such solvents usually
 eliminates  PCS   interference.  Volumetric
 ware  should not  be  heated  in a muffle fur-
 nace.  After  drying  and  cooling,  glassware
 should be sealed  and stored in a clean envi-
 ronment  to prevent any accumulation  of
 dust or other contaminants. Store inverted
 or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2  The use of high purity reagents and
 solvents helps to  minimize interference prob-
 lems.  Purification of solvents by distillation
 in all-glass systems may  be required.
  3.2  Matrix interferences may be caused by
 contaminants that are co-extracted from the
 sample. The extent  of matrix interferences
 will vary considerably from source to source,
 depending upon the  nature and  diversity of
 the industrial complex or municipality being
 sampled. The cleanup  procedure in  Section
 11 can be used to overcome many of these
 interferences, but unique samples may re-
 quire   additional cleanup   approaches   to
 achieve the MDL  listed in Table 1.

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinog-enicity  of
 each reagent used  in  this method  has  not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
 tial health hazard. From this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
 the lowest possible level  by whatever means
available. The  laboratory is responsible for
maintaining a current  awareness  file  of
OSHA  regulations regarding  the  safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made available to all
                                         175

-------
Ft.  136, App. A, Meth. 612
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional references to laboratory  safety
are available and have been identified4-6 for
the information of the analyst.

         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling equipment, for  discrete or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1  Grab  sample  bottle—IcL  or  1-qt,
amber glass, fitted  with a screw cap lined
with Tenon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If  amber
bottles  are  not available,  protect  samples
from light. The bottle and cap liner must be
washed,  rinsed with acetone  or methylene
chloride, and  dried  before  use to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2  Automatic  sampler (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample con-
tainers  for the collection of  a minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4 °C and  protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic  pump,  a  minimum length of
compressible silicone rubber  tubing may be
used.  Before use, however, the compressible
tubing  should be  thoroughly  rinsed with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize the potential for
contamination of the sample.  An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All specifications are sug-
gested. Catalog numbers are included for il-
lustration only.):
  5.2.1  Separatory funnel—2-L, with Teflon
stopcock.
  5.2.2  Drying   column—Chromatographic
column, approximately 400 mm long x 19 mm
ID, with coarse frit filter disc.
  5.2.3  Chromatographic  column—300  long x
10 mm ID, with Teflon stopcock and  coarse
frit filter disc at bottom.
  5.2.4  Concentrator  tube,  Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL,  graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration  must be checked
at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass stopper is used to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.5  Evaporative  flask, Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL (Kontes K-570001-0500  or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.6  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Three-ball macro (Kontes  K-503000-0121 or
equivalent).
  5.2.7 Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.3  Boiling  chips—Approximately   10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C for 30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water bath—Heated, with concentric
ring cover,  capable of  temperature control
(±2 °C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5  Balance—Analytical,  capable  of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.6  Gas   chromatograph—An   analytical
system  complete  with  gas  chromatograph
suitable for on-column injection and all re-
quired accessories  including  syringes, ana-
lytical columns,  gases, detector,  and strip-
chart  recorder.  A  data  system  is  rec-
ommended for measuring peak areas.
  5.6.1  Column  1—1.8 m long  x  2  mm ID
glass,   packed   with   1%   SP-1000   on
Supelcoport  (100/120  mesh) or  equivalent.
Guidelines for the  use of alternate column
packings are provide in Section 12.1.
  5.6.2  Column 2—1.8 m long x2 mm ID glass,
packed  with  1.5%  OV-1/2.4%   OV-225  on
Supelcoport (80/100 mesh)  or equivalent. This
column was used to develop the method per-
formance statements in Section  14.
  5.6.3  Detector—  Electron capture  detec-
tor. This detector has proven effective in the
analysis  of wastewaters for the parameters
listed in the scope (Section 1.1), and was used
to develop  the  method performance  state-
ments in Section 14. Guidelines for the use of
alternate  detectors are provided  in Section
12.1.

                6. Reagents
  6.1  Reagent water— Reagent water is de-
fined as a water in which  an interferent is
not observed at the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Acetone, hexane, isooctane, methanol,
methylene chloride, petroleum ether (boiling
range 30 to 60 °C)—Pesticide quality or equiv-
alent.
  6.3  Sodium sulfate—(ACS)  Granular, an-
hydrous. Purify heating at 400 °C for 4 h in a
shallow tray.
  6.4  Florisil—PR  grade  (60/100 mesh). Pur-
chase activated at  1250 °F  and  store  in the
dark in glass containers with ground glass
stoppers or foil-lined screw caps. Before use,
activate each batch at least 16 h at 130 °C in
a  foil-covered glass container and allow  to
cool.
  6.5  Stock standard solution (1.00 jig/nL)—
Stock  standard  solutions  can  be prepared
from pure standard materials or purchased
as certified solutions.
  6.5.1  Prepare stock standard  solutions by
accurately weighing  about 0.0100 g of pure
material.  Dissolve the material in isooctane
and dilute to volume in a 120-mL volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used  at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity  is  assayed  to be 96% or  greater, the
weight can be used without  correction to cal-
culate the concentration  of the  stock stand-
ard.  Commercially  prepared stock standards
can be used at any  concentration  if they are
certified by the manufacturer or by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.5.2  Transfer  the  stock standard  solu-
tions into Teflon-sealed  screw-cap bottles.
Store at 4 °C  and protect from light. Stock
standard  solutions should  be  checked fre-
quently for signs of degradation or  evapo-
ration,  especially  just  prior to preparing
calibration standards from them.
                                          176

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
  6.5.3  Stock standard solutions must be re-
placed  after  six  months,  or  sooner  if
comparision with check standards indicates
a problem.
  6.6  Quality  control  check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration

  7.1  Establish gas  chromatographic oper-
ating conditions equivalent to those given in
Table  1.  The gas  chromatographic system
can be calibrated using the external standard
technique (Section  7.2) or the internal stand-
ard technique (Section 7.3).
  7.2  External standard  calibration proce-
dure:
  7.2.1  Prepare calibration standards at a
minimum of three concentration levels  for
each  parameter  of interest by adding vol-
umes of one or more stock standards to a
volumetric flask and diluting to volume with
isooctane. One of the  external standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the MDL (Table 1)  and the  other concentra-
tions  should correspond  to  the  expected
range  of  concentrations found in real sam-
ples or should define the working range of
the detector.
  7.2.2  Using injections of 2 to 5 ^L, analyze
each calibration  standard according to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area  re-
sponses against the mass injected.  The  re-
sults  can be used  to prepare a calibration
curve  for each compound.  Alternatively,  if
the ratio of  response  to amount  injected
(calibration factor) is a  constant over  the
working range  (<10%  relative standard devi-
ation, RSD), linearity through the origin can
be assumed and the average ratio or calibra-
tion factor can be used in place  of a calibra-
tion curve.
  7.3  Internal  standard  calibration proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select  one or more internal standards that
are similar  in analytical behavior to  the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate that the  measurement of
the internal  standard  is not  affected  by
method or matrix interferences. Because of
these limitations, no internal standard can
be  suggested that is  applicable to all sam-
ples.
  7.3.1   Prepare calibration standards at  a
minimum of three  concentration levels  for
each parameter of interest by  adding vol-
umes  of one or more stock standards to a
volumetric flask.  To each calibration stand-
ard, add a known constant amount of one or
more  internal standards,  and  dilute to vol-
ume with isooctane.  One of the standards
should be at a concentration near, but above,
the MDL and  the  other concentrations
should correspond to  the expected range of
concentrations found in real  samples   or
should define the working range of the detec-
tor.
  7.3.2  Using injections of 2 to 5 nL, analyze
 each calibration standard  according: to Sec-
 tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
 sponses against concentration for each com-
 pound and  internal standard.  Calculate re-
 sponse factors (RF) for each compound using
 Equation 1.
                   (A1S)(CS)
                                Equation 1

where:
As=Response for the parameter to  be  meas-
  ured.
Als=Response for the internal standard.
C,s=Concentration  of the internal  standard
  (Hg/L).
Cs=Concentration  of  the parameter  to  be
  measured (
If the RF value over the working range is a
constant (<10% RSD), the RF can be assumed
to be invariant and the average RF can  be
used for calculations. Alternatively,  the re-
sults can be used to plot a calibration curve
of response ratios, As/A,s, vs. RF.
  7.4  The  working  calibration curve, cali-
bration factor,  or  RF  must be  verified  on
each working day by the measurement of one
or more calibration standards.  If  the  re-
sponse  for any parameter  varies from the
predicted response by more than ±15%, a new
calibration curve must  be  prepared for that
compound.
  7.5  Before using any cleanup procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date elution patterns  and the  absence  of
interferences from the reagents.

             8, Quality  Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an  ongoing1
analysis of  spiked  samples to evaluate and
document data quality.  The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks  are  compared with  established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method.  When the results  of
sample spikes indicate atypical method per-
formance, a quality control check standard
must be analyzed to confirm that the meas-
urements were performed  in an in-control
mode of operation.
  8.1.1  The  analyst must  make an initial,
one-time, demonstration  of the ability  to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method. This ability is  established
as described in Section 8.2.
                                         177

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  8.1.2  In recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.4, 11.1, and 12.1) to improve the sepa-
rations or lower  the  cost of measurements.
Each time such modification is made to the
method, the analyst is required to repeat the
procedure in Section 8.2.
  8.1.3  Before processing any samples,  the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate that  interferences  from the
analytical system and glassware  are under
control. Each time a set of samples is ex-
tracted or reagents are changed, a reagent
water  blank must  be processed  as a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4  The  laboratory must,  on  an ongoing
basis, spike  and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples to monitor and evaluate lab-
oratory data quality.  This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5  The  laboratory must,  on  an ongoing
basis, demonstrate  through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4. The frequency of the  check  standard
analyses is equivalent to 10% of all samples
analyzed but may be  reduced  if spike recov-
eries  from samples  (Section 8.3)  meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6  The  laboratory must  maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish  the  ability to generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required  containing each pa-
rameter  of  interest  at the  following con-
centrations   in   acetone:  Hexachloro-sub-
stituted  parameters,   10  |ig/mL;  any  other
chlorinated hydrocarbon, 100 (ig/mL. The QC
check sample concentrate must be obtained
from  the U.S.   Environmental  Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port Laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio, if avail-
able. If not  available  from that  source, the
QC check sample concentrate must be ob-
tained from another  external source. If not
available  from either source  above, the QC
check sample concentrate must be prepared
by the laboratory using stock standards pre-
pared independently from those used for cali-
bration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet, prepare QC  check sam-
ples at  the  test concentrations shown in
Table 2 by adding 1.00 mL of QC  check sam-
ple concentrate to each of four 1-L aliquots
of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze   the  well-mixed   QC  check
samples according to  the method beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the  average recovery (X) in
M-gVL, and the standard  deviation of the re-
covery (s) in ng/L, for each parameter using
the four results.
  8.2.5  For each parameter compare s and X
with the corresponding acceptance  criteria
for precision  and accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 2.  If s and X for all param-
eters  of  interest meet the acceptance  cri-
teria, the system performance  is acceptable
and analysis of actual samples can begin. If
any individual  s exceeds the precision limit
or any individual  X falls outside the range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter.
  NOTE: The  large number of parameters in
Table 2  presents  a substantial  probability
that one or more will fail at least one of the
acceptance criteria when all parameters are
analyzed.
  8.2.6  When one or more of the parameters
tested fail at least one of the acceptance cri-
teria, the analyst must proceed according to
Section 8.2.6.1 or 8.2.6.2.
  8.2.6.1  Locate and  correct the source of
the problem  and repeat the  test for all pa-
rameters of interest beginning with Section
8.2.2.
  8.2.6.2  Beginning with Section 8.2.2, repeat
the test  only  for those  parameters  that
failed  to meet criteria.  Repeated  failure,
however,  will  confirm a  general problem
with the  measurement system. If this occurs,
locate and correct the source of the problem
and repeat the  test for all compounds of in-
terest beginning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The laboratory  must,  on an  ongoing
basis, spike at least 10% of the  samples from
each sample  site being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing one to
ten samples  per month, at least one spike
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If,   as  in compliance monitoring,
the concentration of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit, the spike should
be at that limit or 1  to 5 times higher than
the background concentration determined in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the concentration  of a  specific
parameter in  the  sample  is  not  being
checked  against a limit specific to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at the test con-
centration in Section 8.2.2 or  1 to  5 times
higher than  the background concentration
determined in  Section 8.3.2,  whichever con-
centration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If  it  is impractical  to  determine
background levels before spiking (e.g., max-
imum  holding  times will  be exceeded), the
spike concentration should be (1) the regu-
latory concentration limit, if any; or, if none
by (2) the larger of either 5 times higher than
the expected background  concentration or
the test concentration in Section 8.2.2.
                                          178

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 612
  8.3.2 Analyze one sample aliquot to deter-
mine the background concentration  (B) of
each parameter. In necessary, prepare a new
QC check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate for the background concentra-
tions in the sample. Spike a second sample
aliquot with 1.0 mL of the QC check sample
concentrate and analyze it to determine the
concentration after spiking  (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100 (A-B)%/T, where T is  the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3 Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with the corresponding QC
acceptance  criteria found in Table 2. These
acceptance  criteria were calculated  to in-
clude an allowance for error in measurement
of both the background and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a  spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent  that the  analyst's  spike to  back-
ground ratio approaches 5:1.' If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than the
test concentration in Section 8.2.2, the ana-
lyst must use either the QC  acceptance cri-
teria in Table  2, or optional QC acceptance
criteria calculated for the specific spike con-
centration. To calculate optional acceptance
criteria for  the recovery of a parameter: (1)
Calculate accuracy (X') using the equation in
Table 3, substituting the spike concentration
(T) for  C; (2) calculate overall precision (S')
using the equation in Table 3, substituting X'
for X; (3) calculate the range for recovery at
the  spike concentration as (100 X7T) ± 2.44
(100S7T)%.'
  8.3.4 If any individual P falls outside the
designated range for recovery, that param-
eter has failed the acceptance criteria. A
check  standard containing  each parameter
that failed the criteria  must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4. If any parameter fails  the acceptance
criteria for recovery in Section  8.3, a QC
check  standard containing  each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check  standard will depend upon
the  number of parameters  being  simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance of the labora-
tory.
  8.4.1 Prepare  the QC check standard by
adding-  1.0  mL  of QC  check  sample con-
centrate (Sections  8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L of rea-
gent water. The  QC  check  standard  needs
only to contain the parameters that  failed
criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2  Analyze the QC  check  standard to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the  standard concentration.
  8.4.3  Compare the  percent recovery (Ps)
for each parameter with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 2. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared with these criteria. If
the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
side  the  designated  range,  the laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control, and the problem must be
immediately identified  and  corrected. The
analytical result for that parameter in the
unspiked  sample is suspect and may not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5 As part of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,   method  accuracy for waste water
samples must be assessed and records must
be  maintained.  After the analysis of five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8.3,
calculate  the  average percent recovery (P)
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent recovery interval from P-2sp to
P+2sp. If P=90% and sp=10%, for example, the
accuracy  interval is expressed as 70-110%.
Update the accuracy assessment for each pa-
rameter on  a regular basis (e.g. after each
five to ten new accuracy measurements).
  8.6 It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this method. The specific prac-
tices that are most productive depend upon
the needs  of the laboratory and the nature of
the  samples. Field duplicates  may be ana-
lyzed to assess the precision of the environ-
mental  measurements.  When  doubt exists
over the identification of a peak on the chro-
matogram, confirmatory techniques such as
gas  chromatography  with a dissimilar col-
umn, specific  element  detector,  or  mass
spectrometer must be used.  Whenever pos-
sible, the laboratory should analyze standard
reference  materials   and  participate   in
relevent performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  Grab  samples  must be  collected  in
glass containers.  Conventional  sampling
practices8 should be followed,  except that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with sample
before collection. Composite samples should
be collected in refrigerated glass containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program.  Automatic  sampling  equipment
must be as free  as possible of Tygon tubing
and  other potential sources of contamina-
tion.
  9.2  All  samples must be iced  or refrig-
erated at  4°C from  the time  of collection
until extraction.
  9.3  All samples must be extracted within 7
days  of collection and completely  analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.2

           10. Sample Extraction

  10.1 Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the sample bottle for later determination
of sample volume.  Pour the entire sample
into a 2-L  separatory funnel.
                                         179

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 612
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  10.2  Add 60 mL of methylele chloride to
the sample bottle, seal, and  shake 30 s to
rinse the inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to the  separatory funnel and extract  the
sample by shaking' the funnel for 2 min with
periodic venting to release excess pressure.
Allow the organic  layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 min. If the
emulsion  interface between layers is more
than one-third the  volume of the  solvent
layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation.
The  optimum technique  depends  upon  the
sample, but may include stirring, filtration
of the emulsion  through glass wool, cen-
trifugation, or other physical  methods. Col-
lect the methylene chloride extract in a  250-
mL Erlenmeyer flask.
  10.3  Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
ylene chloride to  the sample  bottle and re-
peat the extraction procedure a second time,
combining the extracts in the  Erlenmeyer
flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
manner.
  10.4  Assemble   a  Kuderna-Danish  (K-D)
concentrator by attaching a 10-mL  concen-
trator  tube  to a 500-mL evaporative  flask.
Other  concentration  devices  or techniques
may be used  in  place  of the K-D  concen-
trator if the requirements of Section 8.2 are
met.
  10.5  Pour the combined extract through a
solvent-rinsed  drying  column  containing
about 10  cm of anhydrous sodium  sulfate,
and collect the  extract in the K-D  concen-
trator. Rinse the Erlenmeyer  flask and  col-
umn with 20 to 30 mL of methylene chloride
to complete the quantitative transfer.
  10.6  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
the evaporative flask and attach a three-ball
Snyder  column. Prewet the Snyder column
by adding about 1 mL of methylene chloride
to the top. Place the K-D apparatus on a hot
water bath (60 to  65 °C) so that the concen-
trator tube is partially immersed in the hot
water,  and the entire lower rounded surface
of the flask is bathed with hot vapor. Adjust
the vertical position of the apparatus  and
the water temperature as required to com-
plete the  concentration in 15  to 20 min. At
the proper rate of distillation the balls of the
column will actively chatter but the cham-
bers will not flood with condensed solvent.
When the apparent volume of liquid reaches
1 to 2  mL, remove  the K-D apparatus  and
allow it to drain and cool for at least 10 min.
  NOTE: The  dichloribenzenes have  a suffi-
ciently high volatility that significant losses
may occur in concentration steps if  care is
not exercised. It is important to maintain a
constant gentle  evaporation rate and not to
allow the liquid volume to fall below 1 to 2
mL before removing the K-D apparatus from
the hot water bath.
  10.7  Momentarily  remove the Snyder  col-
umn, add 50 mL of hexane and a new boiling
chip, and reattach the Snyder column. Raise
the tempeature of the water bath to 85 to 90
°C.  Concentrate the extract as in  Section
10.6, except use hexane to prewet the column.
The elapsed time of concentration should be
5 to 10 min.
  10.8 Remove the Snyder column and rinse
the flask and its lower joint into the concen-
trator tube with 1 to 2 mL of hexane. A 5-mL
syringe  is recommended for  this operation.
Stopper the concentrator tube  and store re-
frigerated if further processing will not  be
performed immediately.  If the extract will
be stored longer than two days, it should be
transferred to a Teflon-sealed screw-cap vial.
If  the sample extract  requires no  further
cleanup, proceed with  gas chromatographic
analysis (Section 12). If the sample requires
further cleanup, proceed to Section 11.
  10.9 Determine  the  original sample vol-
ume by refilling the sample bottle to  the
mark and transferring the liquid to a 1000-
mL graduated cylinder.  Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5 mL.

         11. Cleanup and Separation

  11.1 Cleanup procedures may not be nec-
essary for a relatively  clean  sample matrix.
If particular circumstances demand  the  use
of a cleanup procedure,  the analyst may use
the procedure below or any other appropriate
procedure. However, the analyst first must
demonstrate that  the requirements of Sec-
tion 8.2  can be met using the method as re-
vised to incorporate the cleanup procedure.
  11.2 Florisil    column    cleanup    for
chlorinated hydrocarbons:
  11.2.1  Adjust the sample extract to 10 mL
with hexane.
  11.2.2  Place  12  g  of  Florisil   into   a
chromatographic column. Tap the column to
settle the Florisil and add 1 to 2 cm of anhy-
drous sodium sulfate to the top.
  11.2.3  Preelute the column with 100 mL of
petroleum ether. Discard the eluate and just
prior to exposure of the sodium sulfate layer
to the air, quantitatively transfer the sam-
ple  extract onto the column  by decantation
and subsequent petroleum ether  washings.
Discard the  eluate. Just prior to exposure of
the sodium  sulfate layer to the air,  begin
eluting the column with 200 mL of petroleum
ether and collect the eluate in a 500-mL K-D
flask  equipped with a  10-mL  concentrator
tube.  This fraction should contain all of the
chlorinated hydrocarbons.
  11.2.4  Concentrate the fraction as in Sec-
tion 10.6,  except use hexane to prewet  the
column. When the apparatus  is cool, remove
the Snyder  column and  rinse the flask and
its  lower joint  into the  concentrator tube
with  hexane.  Analyze  by  gas  chroma-
tography (Section 12).
                                          180

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
           12. Gas Chromatography

  12.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions  for  the  gas  chro-
matograph. Included in this table  are reten-
tion times  and  MDL that can  be achieved
under these conditions. Examples of the sep-
arations achieved by Columl 2 are shown in
Figures 1 and 2. Other packed  or capillary
(open-tubular)   columns,  chromatographic
conditions,  or detectors  may be used if the
requirements of Section 8.2 are met.
  12.2  Calibrate  the  system daily as  de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12.3  If  the internal standard calibration
procedure is being used, the  internal stand-
ard must be added to the sample extract and
mixed throughly immediately before injec-
tion into the gas chromatograph.
  12.4  Inject 2 to 5 |iL of the sample extract
or  standard into the  gas  chromatograph
using the  solvent-flush  techlique.9 Smaller
(1.0  uL)  volumes may be  injected if  auto-
matic devices are employed. Record the vol-
ume injected to the nearest 0.05 \iL, the total
extract volume,  and the resulting peak size
in area or peak height units.
  12.5  Identify the parameters in the sample
by comparing the  retention  times of  the
peaks  in the sample chromatogram with
those   of   the   peaks   in  standard
chromatograms.  The width of the retention
time window used to  make identifications
should be based upon  measurements of ac-
tual retention time variations of  standards
over the course  of a  day. Three  times  the
standard deviation of a retention time for a
compound  can be used to calculate a  sug-
gested window size; however, the experience
of the analyst should  weigh heavily  in  the
interpretation of chromatograms.
  12.6  If the response for a peak exceeds the
working range of the  system, dilute the ex-
tract and reanalyze.
  12.7  If the measurement of the peak re-
sponse is prevented by the presence of inter-
ferences, further cleanup is required.

              13. Calculations

  13.1  Determine the concentration of indi-
vidual compounds in the sample.
  13.1.1  If the external standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate  the amount of
material injected from  the  peak response
using the  calibration  curve  or calibration
factor determined in Section 7.2.2. The con-
centration in the sample can be calculated
from Equation 2.
     Concentration (Hg/L) =
V,=Volume of extract injected (uL).
V,=Volume of total extract ((iL).
Vs=Volume of water extracted (mL).
  13.1.2 If the internal standard calibration
procedure is used, calculate the concentra-
tion in the sample using the response factor
(RP) determined in  Section 7.3.2 and Equa-
tion 3.
  Concentration (|lg/L) =
   (AS)(IS)
(Ais)(RF)(V0)
                                Equation 2
where:
A=Amount of material injected (ng).
                                Equation 3

where:
As=Response for the parameter to be meas-
  ured.
A,,=Response for the internal standard.
Ii=Amount  of  internal  standard added  to
  each extract (ng).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2  Report results in ng/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          14. Method Performance

  14.1  The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.1  The  MDL  concentrations listed  in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.10
Similar  results were  achieved  using  rep-
resentative wastewaters. The MDL actually
achieved in a given analysis will  vary de-
pending on  instrument sensitivity  and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2  This  method has been tested for lin-
earity of spike  recovery from reagent water
and has been demonstrated to be applicable
over the concentration range from 4xMDL to
lOOOxMDL.1"
  14.3  This method was tested by 20 labora-
tories using reagent water, drinking water,
surface  water,    and   three   industrial
wastewaters  spiked at  six  concentrations
over the range 1.0 to 356 ng/L.11 Single oper-
ator precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter and es-
sentially independent of the sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 3.

               REFERENCES

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. "Determination of Chlorinated Hydro-
carbons  In   Industrial   and   Municipal
Wastewaters, "EPA 6090/4-84-ABC, National
Technical  Information  Service,  PBXYZ,
Springfield, Virginia, 22161 November 1984.
                                         181

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
            40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  3. ASTM  Annual  Book  of  Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constituents," American So-
ciety for Testing and Materials, Philadel-
phia.
  4.  "Carcinogens—Working  With  Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  5.  "OSHA Safety  and  Health Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR part 1910), Occu-
pational Safety and Health  Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic  Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion,  Committee on Chemical Safety, 3rd
Edition, 1979.
  7. Provost, L.P., and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation  of Percent Recovery  Data,"American
Laboratory, 15, 58-63  (1983).  (The value 2.44
used  in the equation in Section 8.3.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  8. ASTM Annual Book of Standards,  Part
31,  D3370-76.  "Standard Practices for Sam-
pling Water," American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  9.  Burke,  J.A.  "Gas Chromatography for
Pesticide Residue Analysis;  Some Practical
Aspects," Journal of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, 48, 1037 (1965).
  10. "Development of Detection Limits, EPA
Method 612, Chlorinated Hydrocarbons," Spe-
cial  letter  report for EPA  Contract  68-03-
2625, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Environmental Monitoring and Support Lab-
oratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
  11.  "EPA  Method  Study   Method  612—
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons," EPA 600/4-84-039,
National Technical  Information   Service,
PB84-187772,  Springfield, Virginia 22161, May
1984.
  12.      "Method     Performance     for
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene by Method 612,"
Memorandum from R. Slater, U.S. Environ-
mental  Protection  Agency,  Environmental
Monitoring  and  Support  Laboratory,  Cin-
cinnati,  Ohio 45268, December 7, 1983.
           TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Parameter
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene ...
Hexachloroethane ... . .
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene . . ...
Hexachlorobutadiene 	 	 	 	
1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 	 ...
2-Chloronaphthalene . . .
Hexachlorobenzene . . ....
Retention time (mm)
Column 1
45
49
52
66
7,7
155
nd
"27
•56
Column 2
6.8
83
7.6
93
20.0
223
'165
"36
"101
Method de-
tection limit
fog/I.)
1.19
003
1 34
1 14
034
005
040
094
005
  Column 1 conditions. Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) coated with 1% SP-1000 packed in a 1 8 m x 2 mm ID glass column with
5% methane/95% argon carrier gas at 25 mL/mm. flow rate. Column temperature held isothermal at 65 °C, except where other-
wise indicated
  Column 2 conditions' Supelcoport (80/100 mesh) coated with 1 5% OV-1/24% OV-225 packed in a 1 8 m x 2 mm ID glass
column with 5% methane/95% argon carrier gas at 25 mL/min flow rate Column temperature held isothermal at 75 °C, except
where otherwise indicated.
  nd=Not determined
  •150 °C column temperature
  b165 °C column temperature
  c 100 °C column temperature

                      TABLE 2—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 612
Parameter
2-Chloronaphthalene ....
1 2-Dichlorobenzene 	 	
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene ... 	 . .
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene . . ....
Hexachlorobenzene . ...
Hexachlorobutadiene . . ....

1 ,2.4-Tnchlorobenzene . ... 	
Test
cone, (ng/
L)
100
100
100
100
10
10
10
10
100
Limit for s
0»gfl->
373
283
264
208
24
22
25
33
31 6
Range for X
(Mi/L)
29 5-126 9
23.5-145.1
72-1386
22 7-126 9
26-148
D-127
D-104
24-12.3
202-133.7
Range for
P.P.
(percent)
9-148
9-160
D-150
13-137
15-159
D-139
D-111
8-139
5-149
  5=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in jig/L (Section 824)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in u.g/L (Section 824)
  P, P,=Percent recovery measured (Section 8.3 2, Section 8 4 2).
  D=Detected; result must be greater than zero
  NOTE These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 3 Where necessary, the limits for recov-
ery have been broadened to assure applicability of the limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3
                                            182

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Ft. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
 TABLE 3—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 612
Parameter
2-Chloronaphthalene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene *
Hexachloroethane
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Acccuracy, as
recovery, X'
(ng/L)
0 75C+3 21
085C-070
0 72C+0 87
0 72C+2 80
087C-002
061C+003
047C
074C-002
0 76C+0 98
Single analyst
precision, s/
(M/L)
028X-1 17
022X-295
021X-1 03
016X-048
014X+007
018X+008
024X
0 23X+0 07
023X-044
Overall preci-
sion, S' (|jg/L)
0 38X - 1 39
041X-392
049X-398
035X-057
036X-019
053X-012
050X
036X-000
0 40X - 1 37
  X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in ng/L
  s/=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in u.g/L
  S/:=Expected mterlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X,  in u.g/l_
  C=True value for the concentration, in ng/L
  X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, jn u.g/L
  d Estimates based upon the performance in a single laboratory 12
                                               183
       203-160   D-7

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
   COLUMN: 1.5% OV-1/2.4% OV-225 ON SUPELCOPORT
   TEMPERATURE:  75t
   DETECTOR:  ELECTRON CAPTURE
     0     4     8     12     16     20    24

                    RETENTION TIME. MIN.


     Figure 1. Gas chromatogram of chlorinated hydrocarbons.
                              184

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
          Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 612
    COLUMN: 1.5% OV-1/2.4% OV-225 ON SUPELCOPORT

    TEMPERATURE:  165'C

    DETECTOR:  ELECTRON CAPTURE
                        UJ
                        a.
                        o
                        o
                         I
                        PM

                                  UJ
                                  ISI
o
<
X
LU
                    0     4    8   12


                    RETENTION TIME, MIN.




       Figure 2. Gas chromatogram of chlorinated hydrocarbons.
                               185

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 METHOD 613—2,3,7,8-TETKACHLORODiBENZO-p-
                  DIOXIN

          1. Scope and Application
  1.1  This method covers the determination
of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxm (2,3,7,8-
TCDD). The following parameter may be de-
termined by this method:
Parameter
2,3,7,8-TCDD
STORET
No
34675
GAS No
1746-01-6
  1.2  This is a  gas chromatographic/mass
spectrometer (GC/MS) method applicable to
the determination of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in munic-
ipal  and industrial  discharges as provided
under 40 CFR 136.1. Method 625 may be used
to screen samples for 2,3,7,8-TCDD. When the
screening test  is positive,  the final  quali-
tative confirmation and quantification must
be made using Method 613.
  1.3  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined in Section 141)1 for 2,3,7,8-TCDD is
listed in Table  1. The MDL  for a specific
wastewater may  be different from that list-
ed,  depending  upon the  nature of  inter-
ferences in the sample matrix.
  1.4  Because of the extreme toxicity of this
compound, the analyst must  prevent expo-
sure to himself,  of to  others, by materials
knows or believed to contain 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
Section 4 of this  method contains guidelines
and  protocols that serve  as minimum safe-
handling standards in a limited-access lab-
oratory.
  1.5  Any modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered  as a major  modification  subject to
application  and  approval  of  alternate test
procedures under 40 CPR 136.4 and 136.5
  1.6  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the  supervision of analysts  experi-
enced in the use of a gas chromatograph'
mass spectrometer and in the interpretation
of mass spectra. Bach analyst  must  dem-
onstrate the ability  to generate  acceptable
results with this method using the procedure
described in Section 8.2.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  A measured  volume of sample, ap-
proximately  1-L, is  spiked with an internal
standard  of  labeled 2.3,7,8-TCDD  and ex-
tracted  with methylene  chloride  using  a
separatory funnel.  The methylene  chloride
extract is exchanged to hexane during con-
centration to a volume of 1.0 mL or less. The
extract is then analyzed by capillary column
GC/MS  to  separate and measure  2,3,7,8-
TCDD.2-3
  2.2 The method provides selected column
chromatographic cleanup proceudres to aid
in the elimination of interferences that may
be encountered.
              3. Interferences
  3.1  Method interferences may be  caused
by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that lead to  discrete artifacts and/or  ele-
vated backgrounds at the masses (m/z) mon-
itored  All of these  materials must be rou-
tinely  demonstrated to be  free from  inter-
ferences under the conditions of the analysis
by running laboratory reagent blanks  as de-
scribed in Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1  Glassware   must   be   scrupulously
cleaned.4 Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
sible after use by  rinsing with the last  sol-
vent used in it. Solvent rinsing should be fol-
lowed by detergent washing with hot water,
and  rinses  with  tap water  and  distilled
water. The glassware should then be drained
dry,  and heated in a muffle  furnace at 400 °C
for 15 to 30 mm. Some thermally stable  ma-
terials, such as PCBs, may not be eliminated
by the treatment. Solvent  rinses with ace-
tone and  pesticide quality hexane may be
substituted for the muffle  furnace heating.
Thorough rinsing with such solvents usually
eliminates  FOB   interference.  Volumetric
ware should not be  heated in a muffle  fur-
nace. After drying  and  cooling,  glassware
should be sealed and stored in  a clean envi-
ronment  to  prevent any accumulation of
dust or other contaminants. Store inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2  The  use of high purity  reagents  and
solvents helps to  mininmize   interference
problems. Purification of solvents  by  dis-
tillation  in  all-glass  systems  may  be re-
quired
  3.2  Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are coextracted from the
sample. The  extent  of matrix  interferences
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending upon the nature and diversity of
the industrial complex or  municipality being
sampled.  2,3.7,8-TCDD  is often associated
with  other  interfering  chlorinated  com-
pounds which are  at concentrations several
magnitudes higher than that of 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
The  cleanup  producers in Section 11  can be
used  to  overcome  many  of  these  inter-
ferences, but unique samples may require ad-
ditional cleanup approaches1-'' 7  to eliminate
false positives and achieve the MDL listed in
Table 1.
  3.3  The primary column,  SP-2330 or equiv-
alent,  resolves 2,3,7,8-TCDD from the other
21 TCDD insomers. Positive  results  using
any other gas chromatographic column must
be confirmed using the primary column.

                 4.  Safety
  4.1  The toxicity or  carcinogenicity of
each reagent used in this  method has  not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical  compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. From  this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
                                          186

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 613
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The laboratory is responsible for
maintaining  a  current  awareness file  of
OSHA regulations  regarding the safe  han-
dling of the chemicals specified In this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made  available to all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional  references to  laboratory safety
are available and have been identified8  lo for
the information of the analyst.  Benzene and
2,3,7,8-TCDD  have  been  identified  as sus-
pected human or mammalian carcinogens.
  4.2  Bach laboratory must  develop a strict
safety program for  handling  2,3,7,8-TCDD.
The  following laboratory  practices  are rec-
ommended:
  4.2.1 Contamination of the laboratory will
be minimized by conducting all manipula-
tions in a hood.
  4.2.2 The effluents of sample splitters for
the gas chromatograph and roughing pumps
on the GC/MS should pass through  either a
column of activated charcoal or be bubbled
through a trap containing  oil or high-boiling
alcohols.
  4.2.3 Liquid waste should  be dissolved in
methanol or ethanol and irradiated  with ul-
traviolet  light with a wavelength greater
than  290 nm for several  days. (Use  F 40 BL
lamps or  equivalent). Analyze liquid wastes
and  dispose of  the  solutions  when 2,3,7,8-
TCDD can no longer be detected.
  4.3  Dow  Chemical U.S.A.  has issued the
following  precautimns  (revised  November
1978) for safe handling of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in the
laboratory:
  4.3.1 The  following statements  on  safe
handling are as complete as  possible on the
basis of available toxicological information.
The  precautions  for  safe  handling  and use
are necessarily general in nature since de-
tailed,  specific  recommendations  can  be
made only  for the  particular exposure and
circumstances of each individual use. Inquir-
ies about  specific operations  or  uses may be
addressed to  the Dow  Chemical Company.
Assistance in evaluating the health hazards
of particular plant  conditions  may be ob-
tained from certain consulting laboratories
and from  State Departments of Health  or of
Labor, many of which have an industrial
health service.  2,3,7,8-TCDD is  extremely
toxic to laboratory animals. However, it has
been handled for years without injury in an-
alytical and  biological laboratories. Tech-
niques used in handling radioactive and in-
fectious materials are applicable to 2,3,7,8,-
TCDD.
  4.3.1.1  Protective      equipment—Throw-
away plastic gloves, apron  or lab  coat, safety
glasses, and a lab hood adequate for radio-
active work.
  4.3.1.2  Training—Workers must be trained
in the proper method of removing contami-
nated  gloves and   clothing  without  con-
tacting the exterior surfaces
  4.3.1.3  Personal hygiene—Thorough wash-
ing of hands and forearms after each manipu-
lation  and before breaks  (coffee,-lunch, and
shift).
  4.3.1.4  Confinement—Isolated work  area,
posted with signs, segregated glassware and
tools,  plastic-backed absorbent  paper  on
benchtops.
  4.3.1.5  Waste—Good  technique  includes
minimizing contaminated waste. Plastic bag
liners should be used  in waste cans. Janitors
must be  trained  in  the  safe  handling of
waste.
  4.3.1.6  Disposal   of wastes—2,3,7,8-TCDD
decomposes above  800 °C. Low-level  waste
such as absorbent paper,  tissues, animal re-
mains, and plastic gloves may be burned in a
good  incinerator.  Gross  quantities  (milli-
grams) should be packaged securely and dis-
posed through commercial or governmental
channels which are capable of handling high-
level radioactive wastes or extremely toxic
wastes. Liquids  should be allowed to evapo-
rate in a good hood and in a disposable con-
tainer.  Residues may then  be handled as
above.
  4.3.1.7  Decontamination—For personal de-
contamination, use any mild soap with plen-
ty of scrubbing action. For decontamination
of   glassware,    tools,    and    surfaces,
Chlorothene NU Solvent  (Trademark of the
Dow Chemical  Company) is  the least toxic
solvent shown  to  be  effective.  Satisfactory
cleaning may  be  accomplished by rinsing
with Chlorothene, then washing with any de-
tergent and water. Dishwater may be  dis-
posed to the sewer.  It is prudent to minimize
solvent wastes because they may require spe-
cial  disposal  through  commercial  sources
which are expensive.
  4 3.1.8  Laundry—Clothing  known  to  be
contaminated should be  disposed with the
precautions described under Section 4 3.1.6.
Lab coats or other clothing  worn in 2,3,7,8-
TCDD work areas may be laundered.
  Clothing should  be collected in plastic
bags. Persons who convey the bags and laun-
der the clothing should be advised of the haz-
ard and trained in  proper  handling  The
clothing may be put  into a washer without
contact if the launderer knows the problem.
The washer should be  run through a cycle be-
fore being used again for other clothing.
  4.3.1.9  Wipe tests—A useful method of de-
termining cleanliness of  work surfaces  and
tools is to wipe the surface with a piece of
filter paper. Extraction and analysis by gas
chromatography can achieve a limit of sensi-
tivity of 0.1 \ig  per wipe. Less than 1 |ig of
2,3,7,8-TCDD per sample indicates acceptable
cleanliness:  anything higher  warrants fur-
ther cleaning. More  than 10  ng on a  wipe
sample constitutes  an acute hazard and re-
quires prompt cleaning before further use of
the equipment or work space. A high (>10 |j.g)
                                          187

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
2,3,7,8-TCDD level Indicates that unaccept-
able work  practices have been employed in
the past.
  4.3.1.10 Inhalation—Any  procedure  that
may produce  airborne  contamination must
be done with  good ventilation. Gross losses
to a ventilation system must not be allowed.
Handling of the  dilute solutions  normally
used in analytical and animal work presents
no inhalation hazards except in  the  case of
an accident.
  4.3.1.11 Accidents—Remove contaminated
clothing immediately,  taking  precautions
not to contaminate  skin or other articles.
Wash exposed skin vigorously and repeatedly
until medical attention is obtained.

         5. Apparatus and Materials
  5.1  Sampling equipment,  for  discrete or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1  Grab  sample  bottle—1-L  or  1-qt,
amber  glass, fitted with a screw cap lined
with Tenon. Foil  may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample is not corrosive. If amber
bottles  are not  available,  protect samples
from light. The bottle and cap liner must be
washed, rinsed with  acetone or methylene
chloride, and  dried before use to  minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2  Automatic  sampler  (optional)—The
sampler must incorporate glass sample con-
tainers  for the collection of a minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4 °C and protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic  pump,  a  minimum length of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may be
used. Before use, however, the compressible
tubing  should be  thoroughly rinsed  with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize  the potential for
contamination of the sample. An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow  propor-
tional composites.
  5.1.3  Clearly label all samples  as "POI-
SON" and ship according to U.S. Department
of Transportation regulations.
  5.2  Glassware  (All  specifications are sug-
gested. Catalog numbers are included for il-
lustration only.):
  5.2.1  Separatory funnels—2-L and 125-mL,
with Teflon stopcock.
  5.2.2  Concentrator   tube,  Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL, graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration must be checked
at the volumes employed in the test.  Ground
glass stopper is used  to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.3  Evaporative flask, Kuderna-Damsh—
500-mL (Kontes K-570001-0500 or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.4  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Damsh—
Three-ball  macro (Kontes  K-503000-0121 or
equivalent)
  5.2.5  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Two-ball  micro  (Kontes  K-569001-0219  or
equivalent).
  5.2.6  Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.2.7  Chromatographic   column—300  mm
long x 10 mm ID,  with  Teflon stopcock and
coarse frit filter disc at bottom.
  5.2.8  Chromatographic   column—400  mm
long x 11 mm ID,  with  Teflon stopcock and
coarse frit filter disc at bottom.
  5.3  Boiling  chips—Approximately   10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C for  30 min or Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water  bath—Heated, with concentric
ring cover,  capable of  temperature control
(±2 °C). The bath should  be used in a hood.
  5.5  GC/MS system:
  5.5.1  Gas   chromatograph—An analytical
system complete  with  a  temperature pro-
grammable  gas chromatograph and  all re-
quired accessories including syringes,  ana-
lytical columns,   and  gases.  The  injection
port must be designed for capillary columns.
Either split, splitless, or on-column injection
techniques may be employed, as long as the
requirements of Section 7.1.1 are achieved.
  5.5.2  Column—60 m  long x  0.25 mm ID
glass or fused silica, coated with SP-2330 (or
equivalent) with a film thickness  oi 0.2 |im.
Any equivalent column must resolve 2, 3,  7,
8-TCDD from the other 21 TCDD isomers.16
  5.5.3  Mass spectrometer—Either a low res-
olution mass spectrometer (LRMS)  or a high
resolution mass spectrometer  (HRMS)  may
be used. The  mass spectrometer  must  be
equipped with a  70 V (nominal) ion source
and  be capable of aquiring m/z abundance
data in real  time selected  ion monitoring
(SIM) for groups of four  or more masses.
  5.5.4  GC/MS interface—Any  GC to  MS
interface can be used that achieves the re-
quirements of Section 7.1.1. GC to MS inter-
faces constructed  of all glass or glass-lined
materials are recommended. Glass surfaces
can  be  deactivated   by  silanizing  with
dichlorodimethylsilane.  To achieve   max-
imum  sensitivity,  the exit end of ohe cap-
illary  column should be  placed in the ion
source. A short piece of fused silica capillary
can  be used as the interface  to  overcome
problems associated with  straightening the
exit end of glass capillary columns.
  5.5.5  The   SIM   data  acquired during the
Chromatographic  program is defined as the
Selected Ion Current  Profile  (SICP). The
SICP can be  acquired under computer con-
trol  or as a  real time analog output. If  com-
puter control is used, there must be software
available to  plot the SICP and report  peak
height or area data for  any m/z in  the  SICP
between specified  time  or  scan number lim-
its
  5 6  Balance—Analytical, capable of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.

                6. Reagents
  6.1  Reagent water—Reagent water is de-
fined as a water in which an interferent  is
not observed at the MDL of 2,  3, 7, 8-TCDD.
                                          188

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 613
  6.2  Sodium  hydroxide  solution  (10  N)—
Dissolve 40 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 100 mL. Wash the solution with
methylene chloride and hexane before use.
  6.3  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.4  Sulfuric acid—Concentrated (ACS, sp.
gr. 1.84).
  6.5  Acetone, methylene chloride, hexane,
benzene,  ortho-xylene,   tetradecane—Pes-
ticide quality or equivalent.
  6.6  Sodium  sulfate—(ACS) Granular,  an-
hydrous. Purify by heating at 400 °C for 4 h
in a shallow tray.
  6.7  Alumina—Neutral, 80/200 mesh (Fisher
Scientific Co., No. A-540 or equivalent).  Be-
fore use, activate  for 24 h at 130 °C in a  foil-
covered glass container.
  6.8  Silica  gel—High  purity grade,  100/120
mesh (Fisher  Scientific Co.,  No. S-679  or
equivalent).
  6.9  Stock standard solutions (1.00 ug/uL)—
Stock  standard solutimns can be prepared
from pure standard materials or purchased
as  certified  solutions.  Acetone  should be
used as the solvent for spiking solutions;
ortho-xylene is recommended for calibration
standards for split injectors; and tetradecane
is recommended for splitless or  on-colum
injectors. Analyze stock internal standards
to verify the absence of native 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
  6.9.1   Prepare stock standard solutions of
2,3,7,8-TCDD (mol  wt 320) and either "C14
2,3,7,8-TCDD (mol  wt 328) or 13C1,2 2,3,7,8-
TCDD (mol wt 332) in an isolated area by ac-
curately weighing about 0.0100 g of pure ma-
terial.  Dissolve the material  in pesticide
quality solvent and dilute to volume in a 10-
mL volumetric flask. When compound purity
is assayed to be 96% or greater, the weight
can be used without correction to calculate
the  concentration of  the stock  standard.
Commercially prepared stock standards can
be used at any concentration if they are cer-
tified by  the manufacturer or by an inde-
pendent source.
  6.9.2  Transfer  the stock  standard solu-
tions into Teflon-sealed screw-cap bottles.
Store in  an  isolated refrigerator  protected
from light. Stock standard solutions should
be checked frequently for signs of degrada-
tion or evaporation, especially just prior to
preparing calibration  standards or spiking
solutions from them.
  6.9.3  Stock standard solutions must be re-
placed after  six months, or sooner if com-
parison with check  standards indicates a
problem.
  6.10  Internal stpoidard spiking solution (25
ngYmLi)—Using stock standard solution,  pre-
pare a spiking solution in acetone of either
nCl,: or  !'CU  2,3.7.8-TCDD at a concentra-
tion of 25 ng/mL. (See Section 10.2)
  6.11  Quality control  check sample con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.
               7.  Calibration
  7.1  Establish gas  chromatograhic  oper-
ating conditions equivalent to those given in
Table  1  and SIM  conditions for  the  mass
spectrometer as described in Section 12.2 The
GC/MS system must be calibrated using  the
internal standard technique.
  7.1.1 Using  stock standards, prepare cali-
bration standards that will allow measure-
ment of relative response factors of at least
three concentration ratios of 2,3,7,8-TCDD to
internal standard. Bach calibration standard
must be prepared to contain the internal
standard at a concentration of 25 ng/mL. If
any interferences  are contributed by the in-
ternal standard at m/z 320 and 322, its con-
centration may be reduced in the calibration
standards and in the internal standard spik-
ing solution (Section 6.10). One  of the cali-
bration  standards should  contain  2,3,7,8-
TCDD at a concentration  near, but above,
the MDL  and  the other  2,3,7,8-TCDD con-
centrations should  correspond  to the  ex-
pected range of concentrations found in real
samples or should define the working range
of the GC/MS system.
  7.1.2 Using injections of 2 to 5 uL, analyze
each  calibration  standardaccording to Sec-
tion 12 and tabulate peak height or area re-
sponse against the concentration  of 2,3,7,8-
TCDD and internal standard.  Calculate  re-
sponse factors (RF) for 2,3,7,8-TCDD using
Equation 1.
             RF =
                   (Ais)(Cs)
                                Equation 1

where:
AS=SIM response for 2,3,7,8-TCDD m/z 320.
A,S=SIM response for the internal  standard,
  m/z 332  for ™C,2  2,3,7,8-TCDD  m/z 328  for
  37 C14 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
C,5=Concentration of the internal standard
  (ug/L).
C_=Concentration of 2,3,7,8-TCDD (ng/L).
If the RF value over  the working range is a
constant (<10% relative standard deviation.
RSD), the RF can be assumed to be invariant
and the average RF can be  used  for calcula-
tions. Alternatively, the results can be used
to plot a calibration curve of response ratios,
AS/A,S, vs. RF.
  7.1.3   The working calibration curve or RF
must be verified on each working day by  the
measurement  of  one or more 2,3,7,8-TCDD
calibration  standards  If  the  response  for
2.3,7,8-TCDD varies  from the  predicted  re-
sponse bv more than  ±15%   the test must be
repeated using  a  fresh calibration  standard.
Alternatively  a new  calibration  curve must
be prepared
                                          189

-------
Pt.  136, App. A.Meth. 613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  7.2  Before using any  cleanup procedure,
the analyst must process a series of calibra-
tion standards through the procedure to vali-
date elution patterns and the absence of
interferences from the reagents.

             8. Quality Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a  formal  quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of  spiked samples to evaluate and
document data quality. The laboratory must
maintain records to document the  quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing  data quality
checks  are  compared with established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the  performance character-
istics of the method.  When results of sample
spikes  indicate  atypical method  perform-
ance,  a  quality control check standard must
be  analyzed to  confirm that the  measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1   The analyst must  make an initial,
one-time, demonstration of the ability to
generate acceptable accuracy and  precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2   In recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the  analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.5, 11.1, and 12.1) to improve the sepa-
rations  or  lower the  cost of measurements.
Each  time such a modification is made to
the method, the  analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section  8.2
  8.1.3   Before processing any samples, the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate  that  interferences  from the
analytical  system and glassware  are under
control.  Each time a set of samples is ex-
tracted or reagents  are  changed,  a reagent
water blank must be processed as a  safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4   The laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, spike and analyze a minimum of 10%
of all samples with  native 2,3,7,8-TCDD to
monitor and evaluate laboratory data qual-
ity  This procedure  is described in Section
8.3.
  8.1.5  The laboratory must, on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure  is described in Section
8.4.  The frequency  of  the check  standard
analyses is  equivalent to 10% of all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from  samples  (Section 8.3)  meet all
specified quality control  criteria.
  8.1.6  The laboratory must maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed  in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish the ability  to  generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing' 2,3,7,8-
TCDD  at a concentration  of 0.100 (ig/mL in
acetone.  The QC check sample  concentrate
must  be  obtained  from the U.S.  Environ-
mental Protection Agency,  Environmental
Monitoring and Support Laboratory in Cin-
cinnati,  Ohio, if available. If not available
from that source, the QC check  sample con-
centrate  must be obtained from another ex-
ternal  source. If not available  from either
source above,  the QC check  sample  con-
centrate  must be prepared  by the laboratory
using  stock standards prepared  independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2  Using a pipet, prepare QC check sam-
ples at a concentration of  0.100 ng/L (100 ng/
L) by  adding  1.00 mL of  QC  check sample
concentrate to each of four 1-L aliquots of
reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze the  well-mixed QC check
samples  according to the method  beginning
in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the average recovery (X) in
Hg/L, and the  standard deviation  of the re-
covery (s) in ng/L, for 2,3,7,8-TCDD using the
four results.
  8.2.5  Compare  s and  (X)  with  the  cor-
responding acceptance criteria for precision
and accuracy,  respectively, found in Table 2.
If s and X meet the acceptance  criteria, the
system performance is acceptable and anal-
ysis of actual samples can begin. If s exceeds
the precision  limit or X  falls  outside the
range for accuracy, the system  performance
is unacceptable for 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Locate and
correct the source of the problem and repeat
the test beginning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The  laboratory  must,  on an  ongoing
basis, spike at least 10% of the samples  from
each sample site being monitored to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing one to
ten samples per month, at least one spiked
sample per month is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If, as  in  compliance  monitoring,
the concentration  of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in  the
sample is being checked against  a regulatory
concentration limit, the spike should be at
that limit or  1 to  5  times higher  than the
background  concentration determined  in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the concentration of 2,3,7,8-TCDD
in the  sample  is not being  checked against a
limit  specific  to that parameter,  the spike
should be at 0.100 |ig/L or 1 to 5 times higher
than  the background concentration deter-
mined in Section 8.3.2, whichever concentra-
tion would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If it is impractical to determine
background levels before spiking (e.g., max-
imum  holding  times  will  be exceeded), the
                                          190

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Ft.  136, App. A,  Meth. 613
spike concentration should be (1)  the  regu-
latory concentration limit, if any; or, if none
(2) the  larger of either 5 times higher than
the expected background concentration or
0.100 ng/L.
  8.3.2  Analyze one sample aliquot to deter-
mine the background concentration  (B) of
2,3,7,8-TCDD. If necessary, prepare  a new QC
check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1) ap-
propriate for the background concentration
in the sample. Spike a second sample aliquot
with  1.0 mL of  the QC check  sample  con-
centrate and analyze it to determine the
concentration  after spiking (A)  of 2.3.7,8-
TCDD.  Calculate percent  recovery  (P> as
100(A-B)%T,  where T is the known true  value
of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the percent recovery (P) for
2,3,7,8-TCDD with the corresponding QC ac-
ceptance criteria found in Table 2.  These ac-
ceptance criteria were calculated to include
an allowance for error  in  measurement of
both  the  background  and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted  for to the
extent  that  the  analyst's spike  to  back-
ground ratio approaches 5.1." If spiking was
performed  at  a concentration lower  than
0.100 jig/L,  the analyst must use either the
QC acceptance  criteria  in Table  2, or op-
tional QC acceptance criteria calculated for
the  specific  spike concentration.  To  cal-
culate optional acceptance criteria for the
recovery of 2,3,7,8-TCDD: (1) Calculate  accu-
racy (X') using the equation in Table 3, sub-
stituting the spike concentration (T)  for C;
(2) calculate  overall precision (S')  using the
equation in Table 3, substituting X' for X; (3)
calculate the range for recovery at the  spike
concentration as (100 X7T)±2.44(100 S'/T)% "
  8.3.4  If the recovery of 2,3,7,8-TCDD falls
outside the designated range for recovery, a
check standard  must  be analyzed  as de-
scribed in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If the  recovery of 2,3,7,8-TCDD fails
the acceptance criteria for  recovery in Sec-
tion 8.3, a QC  check standard  must be pre-
pared and analyzed.
  NOTE: The frequency for the required  anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the complexity of the sample matrix and the
performance  of the laboratory.
  8.4.1  Prepare the QC  check  standard by
adding  1.0 mL of QC check  sample  con-
centrate (Section 8.2.1  or 8.3.2) to 1 L of rea-
gent water.
  8.4.2 Analyze the QC check  standard to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
2,3,7,8-TCDD. Calculate the percent recovery
(Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true value
of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3 Compare  the  percent recovery (Ps)
with the corresponding  QC acceptance cri-
teria  found in Table  2. If the recovery of
2,3,7,8-TCDD  falls  outside the  designated
range, the laboratory performance  is judged
to be out of  control, and the problem  must
be immediately identified and corrected. The
analytical result for 2,3.7,8-TCDD  in  the
unspiked sample is suspect and may not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,  method  accuracy for wastewater
samples must be assessed and records must
be  maintained. After the  analysis  of  five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8._3,
calculate the average percent recovery (P)
and the spandard deviation of the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent recovery interval from P-2sp to
P+2sp. If P=90% and sp=10%, for example, the
accuracy interval is expressed as  70-110%.
Update  the accuracy assessment on a regular
basis  (e.g. after each five to  ten  new accu-
racy measurements).
  8.6  It is recommended that  the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use  with  this method The specific prac-
tices that are most  productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates may be  ana-
lyzed to assess the precision of the environ-
mental   measurements.  Whenever possible,
the laboratory should analyze standard ref-
erence materials  and participate in relevant
performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  Grab  samples  must  be collected in
glass   containers.  Conventional   sampling
practices>2 should be  followed, except  that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with sample
before collection. Composite samples should
be collected in refrigerated glass containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program. Automatic  sampling  equipment
must be as free as possible of Tygon tubing
and other potential sources  of contamina-
tion.
  9.2  All samples must  be iced  or refrig-
erated at 4 °C and protected from light from
the time of collection until extraction.  Fill
the sample bottles and, if residual chlorine is
present,  add 80 mg of sodium thiosulfate per
liter of sample and mix  well. EPA Methods
330.4 and 330.5 may be used for measurement
of residual  chlorine.13  Field  test kits  are
available for this purpose.
  9.3  Label  all  samples  and  containers
"POISON" and  ship according to  applicable
U.S. Department of Transportation regula-
tions.
  9.4  All samples must be extracted within 7
days of collection and completely analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.2

           10. Sample Extraction

  CAUTION: When using this method to  ana-
lyze for 2,3,7,8-TCDD, all  of the following op-
erations must be performed in a limited-ac-
cess laboratory with the analyst wearing full
                                          191

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
protective covering for all exposed skin sur-
faces. See Section 4.2.
  10.1  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the sample  bottle for later determination
of sample volume.  Pour  the  entire sample
into a 2-L separatory funnel.
  10.2  Add  1.00 mL of  internal standard
spiking solution to the sample  in the sepa-
ratory funnel. If the final extract  will  be
concentrated  to a  fixed volume below 1.00
mL (Section 12.3), only that volume  of spik-
ing solution should be added to the sample so
that the final  extract will contain 25 ng/mL
of internal standard at the time of analysis.
  10.3  Add 60  mL of methylene chloride  to
the sample  bottle,  seal, and  shake  30  s  to
rinse  the inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to  the  separatory  funnel and  extract the
sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min. with
periodic  venting to  release excess pressure.
Allow the organic layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 min. If the
emulsion  interface  between  layers is more
than  one-third the  vmlume of the  solvent
layer, the analyst must  employ mechanical
techniques to  complete the phase separation.
The optimum  technique  depends  upon the
sample, but may include stirring, filtration
of  the  emulsion through glass wool,  cen-
trifugation,  or other physical methods. Col-
lect the methylene  chloride extract in a 250-
mL Erlenmeyer flask.
  10.4  Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
ylene chloride to the sample bottle and re-
peat the extraction  procedure a second time,
combining the extracts  in  the Erlenmeyer
flask. Perform a third extraction in the same
manner.
  10.5  Assemble  a  Kuderna-Danish (K-D)
concentrator by attaching a  10-mL  concen-
trator tube to a 500-mL evaporative flask.
Other concentration devices  or techniques
may  be  used  in  place  of the K-D  concen-
trator if the requirements of Section 8.2 are
met.
  10.6  Pour the combined extract into  the
K-D  concentrator.   Rinse the  Erlenmeyer
flask with 20 to 30 mL of methylele chloride
to complete the quantitative transfer.
  10.7  Add one or two clean boiling chips to
the evaporative flask and attach a three-ball
Snyder  column. Prewet  the  Snyder column
by adding about 1 mL of methylene chloride
to the top. Place the K-D apparatus on a hot
water bath (60 to 65 °C)  so that the concen-
trator tube  is  partially immersed in the hot
water, and the entire lower rounded surface
of the flask is bathed with hot vapor. Adjust
the vertical position of the  apparatus and
the water temperature  as required to com-
plete the concentration  in 15 to 20 min.  At
the proper rate of distillation the balls of the
column will actively chatter  but the cham-
bers will  not  flood with  condensed  solvent.
When the apparent volume of liquid reaches
1 mL, remove  the K-D apparatus and allow it
to drain and cool for at least 10 min.
  10.8  Momentarily remove the Snyder col-
umn, add 50 mL of hexane and a new boiling
chip, and reattach the Snyder column. Raise
the temperature of the water bath to 85 to
90°C. Concentrate the extract as in Section
10.7, except use hexane to prewet the column.
Remove the  Snyder  column and rinse  the
flask and its lower joint into  the concen-
trator tube with 1 to 2 mL of hexane. A 5-mL
syringe is recommended for this operation.
Set aside the K-D glassware for reuse in Sec-
tion 10 14.
  10.9  Pour  the  hexane  extract  from  the
concentrator tube into  a 125-mL separatory
funnel.  Rinse  the  concentrator tube  four
times with 10-mL aliquots of hexane. Com-
bine all rinses in the 125-mL separatory fun-
nel.
  10.10  Add 50 mL of sodium hydroxide solu-
tion to the funnel and  shake for 30  to 60 s.
Discard the aqueous phase.
  10.11  Perform a  second wash of  the or-
ganic layer with 50 mL of reagent water. Dis-
card the aqueous phase.
  10.12  Wash the hexane layer with a least
two  50-mL aliquots of concentrated sulfuric
acid. Continue  washing the  hexane  layer
with 50-mL aliquots of concentrated sulfuric
acid until the  acid layer remains colorless.
Discard all acid fractions.
  10.13  Wash the hexane layer with two 50-
mL  aliquots of reagent water.  Discard the
aqueous phases.
  10.14  Transfer  the  hexane extract  into  a
125-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 1 to 2 g
of anhydrous sodium sulfate. Swirl the flask
for 30 s and  decant the hexane  extract into
the  reassembled K-D apparatus. Complete
the  quantitative transfer  with  two  10-mL
hexane rinses of the Erlenmeyer flask.
  10.15  Replace the one or two clean boiling
chips and concentrate the extract to  6 to 10
mL as in Section 10.8.
  10.16  Add a clean boiling chip to the con-
centrator tube and attach a two-ball  micro-
Snyder column. Prewet the column  by add-
ing about 1 mL of hexane  to the top. Place
the micro-K-D apparatus on the water bath
so that the  concentrator  tube is partially
immersed  in  the  hot water.  Adjust  the
vertical position of the apparatus and the
water temperature as required  to complete
the concentration in 5 to 10 min. At the prop-
er rate of distillation the balls of the column
will actively chatter but the chambers will
not flood. When the apparent volume of liq-
uid  reaches about 0.5 mL, remove the K-D
apparatus and allow it  to drain and cool for
at least 10  min.  Remove the micro-Snyder
column and  rinse  its lower joint into the
concentrator tube with 0.2 mL of hexane.
  Adjust the extract volume to 1.0 mL with
hexane. Stopper  the  concentrator tube and
store refrigerated and protected from light if
further processing will not be performed im-
mediately.  If  the  extract will be  stored
                                          192

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 613
longer  than two  days,  it should  be trans-
ferred to a Teflon-sealed screw-cap vial. If
the sample extract requires no further clean-
up, proceed  with  GC/MS analysis (Section
12). If the sample  requires further cleanup,
proceed to Section  11.
  10.17  Determine the original sample vol-
ume by refilling  the  sample  bottle to  the
mark and transferring the liquid  to a 1000-
mL graduated cylinder.  Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5 mL.

          11 Cleanup and Separation

  11.1  Cleanup procedures may not be nec-
essary for a relatively clean sample matrix.
If particular circumstances demand the  use
of a cleanup procedure, the analyst may  use
either procedure below  or any other appro-
priate procedure.15-7 However, the  analyst
first  must  demonstrate that  the require-
ments of Section 8 2 can be  met  using  the
method as revised to incorporate the cleanup
procedure. Two cleanup column options  are
offered  to the analyst in this section. The
alumina column should be used first to over-
come interferences. If background problems
are still encountered,  the silica gel column
may be helpful.
  11.2  Alumina column  cleanup for 2,3,7,8-
TCDD:
  112.1   Fill a 300 mm  long  x 10 mm  ID
chromatographic column with  activated alu-
mina  to the 150 mm level  Tap the column
gently to settle the alumina and add 10 mm
of anhydrous sodium sulfate to the  top.
  11.2.2   Preelute the column with 50 mL of
hexane. Adjust the elution rate to 1 mL/min.
Discard the eluate and just prior to exposure
of the sodium sulfate layer to  the air. quan-
titatively transfer the 1.0-mL sample extract
onto the column  using two 2-mL portions of
hexane to complete the transfer.
  11.2.3   Just prior to exposure of the sodium
sulfate  layei  to  the  air, add  50 mL of  3%
methylene chloride/95%  hexane (V/V)  and
continue the elution of the column Discard
the eluate.
  11.2.4   Next, elute the column with 50 mL
of 20% methylene chloride/80% hexane  (V/V)
into a 500-mL K-D flask equipped with a 10-
mL concentrator tube. Concentrate the col-
lected fraction to 1.0 mL as in Section 10 16
and analyze by GC/MS  (Section 12)
  11,3  Silica gel  column cleanup for 2,3,7.8-
TCDD.
  11.3.1   Fill  a 400 mm  long  x 11 mm  ID
chromatmgraphic  column with silica gel  to
the 300  m.m level  Tap the column  gently to
settle the silica gel and  add 10 mm of anhy-
drous sodium sulfate to the top
  11 3 2   Preelute the column  with 50 mL of
20% benzene/80% hexane (V/V). Adjust the
elution  rate to 1 mL/min. Discard the eluate
and just prior to exposure of the sodium sul-
fate layer to the air, quantitatively transfer
the 1.0-mL sample  extract onto the column
using two 2-mL portions of 20% benzene/80%
hexane to complete the transfer.
  11.3.3 Just prior to exposure of the sodium
sulfate layer to the  air,  add 40 mL of 20%
benzene/80% hexane to the column. Collect
the  eluate  in  a clean 500-mL K-D  flask
equipped  with a  10-mL concentrator  tube.
Concentrate the collected fraction  to 1.0 mL
as in Section 10.16 and analyze by GC/MS.

             12. GC/MS Analysis

  12.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions  for  the  gas   chro-
matograph. Included  in this table are reten-
tion times and MDL that  can be  achieved
under  these conditions. Other capillary col-
umns or chromatographic conditions may be
used if the requirements of Sections 5.5.2 and
8.2 are met.
  12.2  Analyze  standards and samples with
the mass  spectrometer operating in the se-
lected ion monitoring (SIM)  mode using a
dwell time to give at least seven points per
peak. For LBMS, use masses at m/z 320. 322,
and  257 for 2,3,7,8-TCDD and  either m/z 328
for 37C14  2.3,7,8-TCDD  or  m/z 332  for "C12
2,3,7,8-TCDD. For HRMS, use masses at m/z
319 8965 and 321.8936 for 2,3,7.8-TCDD and ei-
ther m/z 327.8847 for "C14 2,3,7,8-TCDD  or ml
z 331.9367 for nC,2 2.3,7,8-TCDD
  12 3  If lower detection limits are required,
the extract  may be carefully evaporated to
dryness under  a gentle stream of  nitrogen
with the concentrator  tube in a water bath
at about 40 °C. Conduct this operation imme-
diately before  GC/MS analysis  Redissolve
the extract in the desired final volume of
ortho-xylene or tetradecane.
  12.4  Calibrate the  system  daily as de-
scribed in Section 7.
  12 5  Inject 2 to 5 uL of the sample extract
into  the gas  chromatograph. The volume of
calibration standard injected must be meas-
ured, or be the same  as all  sample injection
volumes
  12 6  The presence of 2,3,7.8-TCDD is quali-
tatively confirmed if all of the following cri-
teria are achieved:
  12.6.1 The  gas chromatographic column
must resolve 2.3.7,8-TCDD from the other 21
TCDD isomers
  12 6.2 The  masses for native 2.3,7.8-TCDD
(LRMS-m/z 320,  322, and 257 and HRMS-m/z
320 and 322) and  labeled 2,3,7,8-TCDD (m/z 328
or 332) must  exhibit  a simultaneous  max-
imum at a retention time that matches that
of native 2,3.7 8-TCDD in  the  calibration
standard,  with  the performance  specifica-
tions of the analytical system
  12.6.3  The chlorine isotope ratio at m/z 320
and m/z 322 must agree to withm±10% of that
in the calibration standard.
  12.6.4  The  signal of all  peaks  must  be
greater than 2 5 times the noise level
  12.7  For quantitation. measure  the re-
sponse of  the m/z 320  peak  for 2,3.7,8-TCDD
                                          193

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 613
                           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
and the m/z 332 peak for 13C,2 2,3,7,8-TCDD or
the m/z 328 peak for "C14 2.3,7,8-TCDD.
  12.8  Co-eluting Impurities are suspected if
all criteria are achieved except those in Sec-
tion 12.6.3. In this case, another SIM analysis
using masses at m/z 257, 259, 320 and either m/
a 328 or m/z 322 can be performed. The masses
at m/z 257  and m/z 259 are indicative  of the
loss  of one chlorine and one carbonyl group
from 2,3,7,8-TCDD. If masses m/z 257 and m/z
259 give a chlorine isotope ratio that  agrees
to within ±10% of the  same cluster  in the
calibration  standards, then  the presence of
TCDD can  be confirmed. Co-eluting  ODD,
DDE, and  PCB residues  can be confirmed,
but will require another injection using the
appropriate SIM masses or  full  repetitive
mass scans. If the response  for 37C14 2,3,7,8-
TCDD at m/z 328 is too large, PCB contami-
nation is suspected and can be confirmed by
examining  the response at both m/z 326 and
m/z  328.  The  "Ch,  2,3,7,8-TCDD  internal
standard gives negligible response  at m/z 326.
These  pesticide  residues  can  be  removed
using the  alumina  column cleanup  proce-
dure.
  12.9  If broad background  interference  re-
stricts the  sensitivity of the GC/MS analysis,
the analyst should employ additional  clean-
up procedures and reanalyze by GC/MS
  12.10  In  those circumstances where these
procedures do not yield a definitive conclu-
sion,  the use  of high resolution mass spec-
trometry is suggested.5

              13. Calculations

  13.1  Calculate the concentration of  2,3,7,8-
TCDD in the sample using the response fac-
tor  (RP)  determined  in Section  7.1.2  and
Equation 2.
     Concentration (p-g/L) =
(A)(Vt)
(v,)(vs)
                                Equation 2

where:
A,=SIM response for 2,3,7,8-TCDD at m/z 320.
An=SIM response for the internal standard at
  m/z 328 or 332.
I,=Amount  of internal standard  added to
  each extract (|ig).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  13.2  For each sample, calculate the  per-
cent  recovery of the internal  standard by
comparing the area of the m/z peak measured
in the sample to the area of the same peak
in the calibration standard. If the recovery is
below 50%, the analyst should review all as-
pects of his analytical technique.
  13.3  Report results in (ig/L without correc-
tion for recovery data.  All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.
           14. Method Performance

  14.1  The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as  the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.1 The MDL concentration listed in Table
1 was  obtained  using reagent water.14 The
MDL actually achieved in a given analysis
will  vary  depending on  instrument  sensi-
tivity and matrix effects.
  14.2  This method was tested by 11  labora-
tories  using  reagent  water, drinking water,
surface water,  and  three  industrial  waste-
waters spiked at six concentrations over the
range 0.02 to 0 20 |ig/L." Single operator pre-
cision, overall precision,  and method accu-
racy were found to be directly related to the
concentration of the parameter and  essen-
tially  independent  of the sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these relation-
ships are presented in Table 3

                REFERENCES

  1. 40 CFR part  136, appendix B.
  2.  "Determination of TCDD  in  Industrial
and  Municipal  Wastewaters," EPA 600/4-82-
028, National Technical Information Service,
PB82-196882, Springfield, Virginia 22161, April
1982.
  3 Buser, H.R , and Rappe. C. "High Resolu-
tion   Gas   Chromatography   of  the   22
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  Isomers,"  Ana-
lytical Chemistry, 52, 2257 (1980).
  4. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and for  Preserva-
tion of Organic  Constituents," American So-
ciety for Testing and Materials,  Philadel-
phia.
  5.  Harless, R.  L., Oswald,  E. 0.,  and
Wilkinson. M. K  "Sample Preparation and
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry De-
termination  of  2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin," Analytical Chemistry, 52, 1239 (1980).
  6.  Lamparski, L.  L., and Nestrick, T.  J.
"Determination   of  Tetra-.   Hepta-,   and
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Isomers in Par-
ticulate  Samples at Parts per Trillion Lev-
els," Analytical Chemistry, 52, 2045 (1980).
  7.  Longhorst,  M.  L., and  Shadoff, L.  A.
"Determination  of  Parts-per-Trillion  Con-
centrations of Tetra-, Hexa-, and Octachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxins in Human Milk,"  Analytical
Chemistry, 52, 2037 (1980).
  8.  "Carcinogens—Working  with  Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Public Health Service, Center  for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety  and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  9.  "OSHA  Safety and  Health Standards,
General  Industry,"  (29  CFR  part   1910),
Occuptional  Safety  and Health Administra-
tion, OSHA 2206  (Revised, January 1976).
                                          194

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
               Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 624
  10. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion, Committee  on  Chemical  Safety, 3rd
Edition, 1979.
  11.  Provost, L.  P., and Elder, R.  S., "In-
terpretation  of   Percent  Recovery  Data,"
American  Laboratory,  15, 58-63  (1983).  (The
value 2.44 used in the  equation in  Section
8.3.3 is two  times the value 1.22 derived in
this report.)
  12. ASTM  Annual Book of Standards, Part
31,  D3370-76, "Standard  Practices for Sam-
pling Water,"  American  Society for  Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  13. "Methods, 330.4 (Titrimetric, DPD-FAS)
and  330.5   (Spectrophotometric  DPD)  for
Chlorine,  Total   Residual,"   Methods  for
Chemical  Analysis of  Water  and  Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020,  U.S. Environmental  Pro-
tection Agency,  Environmental Monitoring
and Support  Laboratory, Cincinnati,  Ohio
45268, March 1979.
  14. Wong. A.S. et al. "The Determination of
2,3,7,8-TCDD  in   Industrial  and Municipal
Wastewaters,  Method 613, Part 1—Develop-
ment and Detection Limits," G. Choudhay, L.
Keith, and C.  Ruppe,  ed., Butterworth Inc.,
(1983).
  15.  "EPA  Method Study  26,  Method  613:
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin,"     EPA
600/4-84-037,  National Technical  Information
Service,  PB84-188879,  Spring-field,  Virginia
22161, May 1984.

TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND
          METHOD DETECTION LIMIT
Parameter
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Retention
time (mm)
131
Method
detection
limit (ug/
L)
0002
  Column conditions SP-2330 coated on a 60 m long x 0 25
mm ID glass column with hydrogen earner gas at 40 cm/sec
linear velocity,  splitless injection using tetradecane Column
temperature held  isothermal at 200°C for  1 mm, then pro-
grammed at 8°C/min to 250 °C and held Use of helium car-
rier gas will approximately double the retention time

TABLE 2—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD
                     613
Parameter
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Test
cone
(ng/L)
0100
Limit
tors
(ug/L)
00276
Range for X
(H9/L)
0 0523-0 1226
Range
forP,
P,(%)
45-129
  s=Standard deviation of four recovery measurements, in ug/
L (Section 824)
  X=Average recovery for four recovery measurements, in ng/
L (Section 824)
  P, Ps=Percent recovery measured (Section 832, Section
842)
  NOTE  These criteria are based directly upon the method
performance data in Table 3. Where necessary, the limits for
recovery have been broadened to assure applicability of the
limits to concentrations below those used to develop Table 3
  TABLE 3—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 613
Parameter
2,3,7,8-TCDD
Accuracy, as recov-
ery, X'(ng/L)
086C+000145
Single analyst, pre-
cision, sr'(u/L)
0 13X+0 00129
Overall precision,
S'(u/g/L)
0 19X+0 00028
  X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements  of a sample containing a concentration of C, in ug/L
  sr'=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ug/L
  S'=Expected mterlaboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in ug/L
  C=True value for the concentration, in ug/L
  X=Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in uxj/L
          METHOD 624—PURGEABLES

           1. Scope and Application
  1.1  This method covers the determination
of a number of purgeable organics. The fol-
lowing  parameters  may be determined  by
this method:
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene 	
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylviny! ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
STORET
No
34030
32101
32104
34413
32102
34301
34311
34576
32106
34418
32105
34536
CAS No
71-43-2
75-27^1
75-25-2
74-83-9
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
110-75-8
67-66-3
74-87-3
124-48-1
95-50-1
Parameter
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane . ,
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride 	
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Tnchloroethene .
1,1,2-Tnchloroethene
Tnchloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
STORET
No
34566
34571
34496
34531
34501
34546
34541
34704
34699
34371
34423
34516
34475
34010
34506
34511
39180
34488
39175
CAS No
541-73-1
106-46-7
75-34-3
107-06-2
75-35^1
156-60-5
78-87-5
10061-01-5
10061-02-6
100-41-4
75-09-2
79-34-5
127-18^t
108-88-3
71-55-6
79-00-5
79-01-6
75-69-4
75-01-4
                                             195

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  1.2  The method may be extended to screen
samples for acrolem (STORET No. 34210, CAS
No. 107-02-8) and acrylonitrile (STORET No.
34215, GAS No.  107-13-1),  however,  the pre-
ferred  method  for these two compounds  in
Method 603.
  1.3  This is a  purge and trap gas chromato-
graphic/mass spectrometer (GC/MS)  method
applicable to the determination of the com-
pounds listed above in municipal and indus-
trial discharges as provided under  40  CFR
136.1.
  1.4  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined in Section 14.1)1 for each parameter is
listed  in Table 1. The  MDL for a  specific
wastewater may differ from those listed, de-
pending upon the nature of interferences in
the sample matrix.
  1.5  Any modification to this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as a  major modification subject  to
application and approval of alternate test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5. De-
pending upon the nature of the modification
and the extent  of intended use,  the applicant
may be required to  demonstrate that the
modifications will produce equivalent results
when applied to relevant wastewaters.
  1.6  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the  supervision  of analysts experi-
enced in the operation  of a purge and trap
system and a gas chromatograph/mass spec-
trometer and in the interpretation of mass
spectra. Bach analyst must demonstrate the
ability to generate acceptable results  with
this method using the procedure described in
Section 8.2

           2. Summary of Method
  2.1  An inert gas is bubbled through a 5-mL
water  sample  contained  in  a  specially-de-
signed purging chamber at ambient tempera-
ture.  The purgeables are efficiently trans-
ferred  from  the aqueous phase to the vapor
phase.  The vapor is swept through a sorbent
trap where the  purgeables are trapped  After
purging is completed, the trap is heated and
backflushed with the inert gas  to desorb the
purgeables onto a gas chromatographic col-
umn. The gas chromatograph is temperature
programmed  to  separate  the  purgeables
which  are then detected with  a mass spec-
trometer.2 '

               3. Interferences

  3.1  Impurities in  the purge gas,  organic
compounds  outgassing  from the  plumbing
ahead of the trap, and solvent vapors in the
laboratory account  for  the majority of con-
tamination problems. The analytical system
must be  demonstated to be  free from con-
tamination under the conditions of the anal-
ysis by running laboratory reagent blanks as
described  in  Section  8.1.3  The use  of  non-
Teflon plastic   tubing,  non-Teflon  thread
sealants,  or  flow controllers  with  rubber
components in the purge and trap system
should be avoided.
  3.2  Samples can be contaminated by diffu-
sion of volatile organics (particularly fluoro-
carbons and methylene chloride) through the
septum seal into the sample during shipment
and storage. A field reagent blank  prepared
from reagent water and carried through the
sampling and handling protocol can serve  as
a check on such contamination.
  3.3  Contamination   by  carry-over  can
occur whenever high level and  low level sam-
ples are sequentially  analyzed. To reduce
carry-over,  the purging  device  and sample
syringe must be rinsed with  reagent water
between sample  analyses. Whenever an un-
usually concentrated sample is encountered,
it should be followed by an analysis of rea-
gent water to check for cross contamination.
For samples containing large  amounts  of
water-soluble  materials,  suspended  solids,
high boiling compounds or high pureeable
levels, it may be necessary to wash the purg-
ing device with a detergent solution, rinse it
with distilled water, and then  dry it in a 105
°C  oven between  analyses.  The trap  and
other parts of the system are also subject  to
contamination; therefore, frequent  bakeout
and purging of the entire system may be re-
quired.

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogemcity  of
each reagent used  in  this method has not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a  poten-
tial health hazard. From this  viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever  means
available.  The laboratory is responsible for
maintaining a  current  awareness  file  of
OSHA  regulations regarding  the safe  han-
dling   of  the  chemicals  specified  in  this
methmd. A reference  file of  material  data
handling sheets  should also be  made avail-
able to all personnel involved in the  chem-
ical analysis.  Additional references to  lab-
oratory safety are  available  and have  been
identified4 6 for the information of  the  ana-
lyst.
  4.2.   The following parameters covered by
this method have been tentatively classified
as known or suspected, human or  mamma-
lian carcinogens:   benzene,   carbon  tetra-
chloride,  chloroform,  1,4-dichlorobenzene,
and  vinyl  chloride. Primary  standards  of
these toxic compounds should  be prepared in
a hood. A NIOSH/MESA approved toxic gas
respirator should be worn when the analyst
handles high concentrations  of these toxic
compounds.

         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling equipment, for discrete sam-
pling.
                                         196

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 624
  5.1.1  Vial—25-mL  capacity   or  larger,
equipped with a screw cap with a hole in the
center (Pierce  #13075 or equivalent). Deter-
ment wash, rinse with tap and distilled water,
and dry at 105 °C before use.
  5.1.2  Septum—Teflon-faced       silicane
(Pierce  #12722  or  equivalent).  Detergent
wash, rinse with tap and distilled water, and
dry at 105 °C for 1 h before use.
  5.2  Purge and trap system—The purge and
trap system consists of three separate pieces
of equipment:  A purging  device, trap,  and
desorber.  Several complete systems are now
commercially available.
  5.2.1  The purging device must be designed
to accept 5-mL samples with a water column
at least 3 cm deep. The gaseous head space
between the water column and the trap must
have a total volume of less than 15 mL. The
purge gas must pass though  the water col-
umn as finely divided bubbles with a diame-
ter of less than 3 mm at the origin. The
purge gas must be  introduced no more than
5 mm from the base of the water column.
The  purging  device illustrated in Figure 1
meets these design criteria.
  5.2.2  The trap must be at least 25 cm long
and have  an inside  diameter of at least 0.105
in. The trap must be packed to contain the
following minimum lengths of adsorbents: 1.0
cm of methyl silicone coated packing (Sec-
tion 6.3.2), 15  cm  of 2,6-dyphenylene oxide
polymer (Section 6.3.1), and 8 cm of silica gel
(Section 6.3.3).  The minimum specifications
for the trap are illustrated in Figure 2.
  5.2.3  The desorber should  be capable of
rapidly heating the trap to 180 °C. The poly-
mer section of  the trap  should not be heated
higher than 180 °C and the remaining sec-
tions should not exceed 200 °C. The desorber
illustrated in Figure 2  meets these design
criteria.
  5.2.4  The purge and trap system may be
assembled as a  separate unit or be coupled to
a gas chromatograph as illustrated in Fig-
ures 3 and 4.
  5.3  GC/MS system:
  5.3.1  Gas chromatograph—An analytical
system complete with  a  temperature pro-
grammable gas chromatograph suitable for
on-column injection and all required  acces-
sories  including syringes, analytical col-
umns, and gases.
  5.3.2   Column—6 ft  long x 0.1  in ID  stain-
less steel or glass,  packed with  1% SP-1000
on Carbopack B (60/80 mesh) or equivalent.
This column was used to develop the method
performance  statements  in   Section   14
Guidelines for  the  use  of  alternate column
packings are provided in Section 11  1
  5.3.3  Mass spectrometer—Capable of scan-
ning frum 20 to 260 amu every 7 a or less, uti-
lizing 70 V (nominal) electron energy in the
electron impact lonization mode,  and pro-
ducing a mass spectrum which meets all the
criteria in Table 2 when 50 ng oi 4-bromofluo-
robenzene (BFB) is injected through the GC
inlet.
  5.3.4 GC/MS   interface—Any  GC  to  MS
interface  that  gives  acceptable calibration
points at 50 ng or  less per injection for each
of the parameters of interest and achieves all
acceptable performance criteria (Section 10)
may  be  used.   GC to MS interfaces con-
structed of all glass or glass-lined materials
are recommended. Glass can be deactivated
by silanizing with dichlorodimethylsilane.
  5.3.5 Data system—A  computer  system
must be interfaced to the mass spectrometer
that  allows the continuous acquisition and
storage on  machine-readable  media  of all
mass spectra obtained throughout the dura-
tion of the chromatographic program. The
computer must have  software that allows
searching any GC/MS data file for specific m/
z (masses) and plotting such m/z abundances
versus time or  scan  number.  This type of
plot is defined  as  an  Extracted Ion Current
Profile (EICP).  Software must  also be avail-
able that allows integrating the abundance
in any EICP between specified time or scan
number limits.
  5.4  Syringes—5-mL,   glass   hypodermic
with Luerlok tip (two  each), if applicable to
the purging device.
  5.5  Micro syringes—25-nL, 0.006 in. ID nee-
dle.
  5.6  Syringe valve—2-way, with Luer ends
(three each).
  5.7  Syringe—5-mL, gas-tight with shut-off
valve.
  5.8  Bottle—15-mL, screw-cap, with Teflon
cap liner.
  5.9  Balance—Analytical, capable  of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.

                6. Reagents
  6.1  Reagent water—Reagent water is de-
fined as a water in which an  interferent is
not observed at the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.1.1 Reagent water can be  generated by
passing tap water through a carbon filter bed
containing about  1 Ib of activated carbon
(Filtrasorb-300, Calgon Corp., or equivalent).
  6.1.2 A    water   purification    system
(Millipore  Super-Q or equivalent)  may be
used to generate reagent water.
  6.1.3 Reagent water may also be prepared
by boiling water for  15 min.  Subsequently,
while maintaining the temperature at 90 °C,
bubble a contaminant-free inert gas through
the water for 1 h. While still  hot,  transfer
the water to a narrow mouth screw-cap bot-
tle and seal with a Teflon-lined septum and
cap.
  6.2  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.3  Trap materials:
  6.3.1 2.6-Diphenylene   oxide  polymer—
Tenax, (60/80 mesh), chromatograpmc grade
or equivalent
  6.3.2 Methyl silioone packing -3% OV-1 oil
Chromosorb-W (60/80 mesh) oi equivalent.
                                          197

-------
Pt.  136, App. A.Meth. 624
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  6.3.3  Silica  gel—35/60  mesh,   Davison,
grade-15 or equivalent
  6.4  Methanol—Pesticide quality  or equiv-
alent.
  6.5  Stock    standard   solutions—Stock
standard  solutions  may be prepared  from
pure  standard materials  or purchased  as
certified solutions.  Prepare  stock  standard
solutions  in methanol using assayed liquids
or gases as appropriate. Because of the tox-
icity of some  of the compounds, primary  di-
lutions of these materials should be prepared
in a hood. A NIOSH/MESA approved  toxic
gas respirator should be used when the ana-
lyst handles high concentrations of such ma-
terials.
  6.5 1  Place about  9.8 mL of methanol into
a 10-mL ground glass stoppered volumetric
flask. Allow the flask  to stand, unstoppered,
for about  10 min or until all alcohol wetted
surfaces have dried. Weigh the  flask to the
nearest 0.1 mg.
  6.5.2  Add the assayed reference material:
  6.5.2.1 Liquids—Using  a 100-|j.L   syringe,
immediately add  two  or more  drops of  as-
sayed reference material to  the  flask,  then
reweigh. Be sure that  the drops fall directly
into the alcohol without contacting the neck
of the flask.
  6.5.2.2 Gases—To  prepare standards  for
any of the four halocarbons that boil below
30   °C    (bromomethane,   chloroethane,
chloromethane, and vinyl chloride), fill a 5-
rnL valved gas-tight  syringe with  the ref-
erence standard to the 5 0-mL  mark. Lower
the needle to  5 mm  above the methanol me-
niscus. Slowly introduce the reference stand-
ard above  the surface of the liquid (the heavy
gas will rapidly dissolve in the methanol).
  6.5.3  Reweigh, dilute to volume,  stopper,
then  mix by  inverting the flask  several
times. Calculate the concentration  in ng/(iL
from the net gain in weight. When compound
purity is  assayed  to be 96% or greater, the
weight may  be used without correction to
calculate   the  concentration of the  stock
standard.   Commercially   prepared  stock
standards may be  used at any concentration
if they are certified by the manufacturer or
by an independent source.
  6.5.4  Transfer the stock standard solution
into a Teflon-sealed screw-cap bottle. Store,
with minimal headspace, at -10 to -20 °C
and protect from light.
  6.5.5  Prepare fresh  standards weekly  for
the four gases and 2-chloroethylvinyl ether.
All other  standards must be replaced  after
one  month,  or sooner  if comparison  with
check standards indicates a problem.
  6.6  Secondary  dilution standards—Using
stock solutions, prepare secondary dilution
standards in methanol that contain the com-
pounds of interest, either singly or mixed  to-
gether. The   secondary dilution  standards
should be prepared at concentrations  such
that the aqueous  calibration standards pre-
pared in Section 7.3 will bracket the working
range of the analytical system. Secondary
dilution  standards should  be  stored  with
minimal headspace and should be checked
frequently for signs of degradation or evapo-
ration,  especially just  prior  to  preparing
calibration standards from them.
  6.7  Surrogate standard spiking solution—
Select a minimum of  three  surrogate  com-
pounds from Table 3. Prepare stock standard
solutions  for each  surrogate  standard  in
methanol as described in Section 6.5. Prepare
a surrogate standard spiking solution  from
these stock standards  at a concentration of
15 p.g/mL in water. Store the solutions at 4 °C
in Teflon-sealed glass containers with a min-
imum of headspace. The solutions should be
checked  frequently for stability. The  addi-
tion of 10 |iL  of this solution of 5 mL of sam-
ple  or standard is equivalent to a concentra-
tion of 30 |ig/L of each surrogate standard.
  6.8  BFB  Standard—Prepare a 25 |ig/mL so-
lution of BFB in methanol.
  6.9  Quality control  check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1.

               7. Calibration

  7.1  Assemble a purge and trap system that
meets the specifications in Section 5.2. Con-
dition the  trap   overnight  at  180  °C  by
backflushing with an  inert  gas flow of at
least 20 mL/min. Condition  the trap for 10
min once daily prior to use.
  7.2  Connect the purge and trap system to
a   gas   chromatograph.  The   gas   chro-
matograph must  be operated using  tempera-
ture and flow rate conditions  equivalent to
those given in Table 1.
  7.3  Internal  standard  calibration  proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select three or more internal standards that
are  similar  in analytical behavior  to the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate that the  measurement of
the  internal  standard  is not  affected  by
method or matrix interferences. Some rec-
ommended internal standards are  listed in
Table 3.
  7.3.1  Prepare  calibration  standards  at a
minimum of three concentration levels for
each parameter by carefully adding 20.0 |xL of
one or more secondary dilution standards to
50, 250, or 500 mL of reagent water. A 25-|iL
syringe with a 0.006 in.  ID needle should be
used for this operation. One of the calibra-
tion standards should  be at a concentration
near, but above,  the MDL (Table 1) and the
other concentrations  should  correspond  to
the expected range of concentrations found
in real samples or should define the working
range of the GC/MS system. These aqueous
standards can be  stored up to 24 h, ii  held in
sealed vials with  zero headspace as described
in Section 9.2. If  not so stored, they must be
discarded after 1 h.
  7.3.2 Prepare   a spiking   solution  con-
taining each of the internal standards using
the procedures described in Sections  6.5 and
                                          198

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
6.6. It as recommended that the secondary di-
lution standard be prepared at a concentra-
tion of 15  p.g/mL  of each internal standard
compound. The addition of  10  nL of  this
standard to 5.0 mL of sample or calibration
standard would be equivalent to 30 |ig/L.
  7.3.3 Analyze each calibration  standard
according to Section 11, adding 10 p.L of in-
ternal standard spiking solution directly to
the syringe (Section 11.4). Tabulate the area
response of the  characteristic m/z against
concentration for  each compound and inter-
nal standard, and calculate response factors
(RF) for each compound using Equation 1.
             RF =
                                Equation 1

where:
A s=Area of the characteristic m/z for the pa-
  rameter to be measured.
A,s=Area of the  characteristic  m/z for the
  inernal standard.
Clk=Concentration of the internal standard.
C,=Concentration  of the  parameter to  be
  measured.
If the RF value  over the working range is a
constant (<35% RSD), the RF can be assumed
to be invariant  and the average RF can be
used for calculations. Alternatively, the re-
sults can be used to plot a calibration curve
of response ratios, A s/A,b, vs. RF.
  7.4  The working- calibration  curve or RF
must be verified on each working day by the
measurement of a QC check sample.
  7.4.1   Prepare  the  QC check sample as de-
scribed  in Section 8.2.2.
  7.4.2   Analyze the QC check sample accord-
ing to the method beginning in Section 10.
  7.4.3   For  each parameter, compare the re-
sponse  (Q) with  the corresponding calibra-
tion acceptance  criteria found in Table 5. If
the responses  for all parameters of interest
fall within the designated ranges, analysis of
actual samples can begin. If any individual Q
falls outside the range,  proceed  according to
Section 7.4.4.
 NOTE: The large number of parameters in
Table 5 present a  substantial probability
that one or  more will not meet the calibra-
tion acceptance criteria when all parameters
are analyzed.
 7.4.4   Repeat the test only for  those pa-
rameters that failed to  meet the calibration
acceptance criteria.  If the response for a pa-
rameter does  not fall within the range in
this second  test, a new calibration curve or
RF must be prepared for that parameter ac-
cording to Section 7.3.

             8. Quality Control
 8.1 Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to  operate a formal  quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of spiked samples to evaluate and
document data quality. The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks  are compared  with established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes  indicate  atypical  method perform-
ance, a  quality control check standard must
be  analyzed to confirm that the measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8 1.1  The analyst must  make  an initial,
one-time,  demonstration  of the  ability to
generate acceptable accuracy and precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2  In  recognition of advances that are
occurring in chromatography, the analyst is
permitted  certain options  (detailed in Sec-
tion 11.1) to improve the separations or lower
the cost of measurements.  Each time such a
modification is made to the method, the ana-
lyst is  required to repeat  the procedure in
Section 8.2.
  8.1 3  Each day, the analyst must analyze a
reagent  water blank  to  demonstrate that
interferences from the analytical system are
under control.
  8.1.4  The laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike and analyze a minimum of 5% of
all samples to monitor and evaluate labora-
tory  data  quality.  This  procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5  The laboratory must,  on an ongoing
basis, demonstrate through the  analyses of
quality  control check standards that the op-
eration  of the  measurement system is in con-
trol. This  procedure is described  in Section
8.4. The frequency of the check standard
analyses is equivalent to 5%  of  all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from  samples (Section 8 3) meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6  The laboratory must spike all sam-
ples with  surrogate  standards  to  monitor
continuing  laboratory performance.  This
procedure is described in Section 8.5.
  8.1.7  The laboratory must  maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.6.
  8.2  To establish the ability  to generate
acceptable  accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1  A quality control (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing each pa-
rameter of interest at a concentration of 10
Hg/mL in methanol. The  QC  check sample
concentrate must be obtained from the U.S.
Environmental Protection  Agency, Environ-
mental  Monitoring and Support  Laboratory
in Cincinnati,  Ohio, if available. If not avail-
able from that source, the  QC check sample
                                         199

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
concentrate must be obtained from another
external source. If not available from either
source  above,  the  QC check  sample  con-
centrate must be prepared by the laboratory
using stock  standards prepared  independ-
ently from those used for calibration.
  8.2.2  Prepare a QC check sample to con-
tain 20 ng/L of each parameter by adding 200
uL of QC check sample  concentrate to 100 mL
of reagent water.
  8.2.3  Analyze  four 5-mL  aliquots of the
well-mixed QC check  sample  according  to
the method beginning in Section 10.
  8.2.4  Calculate the average recovery (X) in
ug/L, and the standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in |ig/L, for  each parameter of in-
terest using the four results.
  8.2.5  For each parameter compare s and X
with  the corresponding acceptance criteria
for   precision and  accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 5. If s  and X for all param-
eters of interest meet the acceptance cri-
teria, the system performance  is acceptable
and analysis of actual  samples can begin. If
any  individual s exceeds the precision limit
or any  individual X falls outside the  range
for accuracy, the system performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter.
  NOTE: The  large number of parameters in
Table 5 present  a  substantial probability
that one or more will fail at least one of the
acceptance criteria when  all parameters are
analyzed.
  8.2.6  When one or more of the parameters
tested fail at least one  of the acceptance cri-
teria, the analyst must proceed according to
Section 8.2.6.1 or 8.2.6.2.
  8.2.6.1  Locate and correct the  source of
the problem  and repeat the test for all pa-
rameters of interest beginning with Section
8.2.3.
  8.2.6.2  Beginning with Section 8.2.3, repeat
the  test  only for those  parameters  that
failed to meet  criteria.  Repeated failure,
however,  will  confirm a general  problem
with the measurement  system. If this occurs,
locate and correct the  source of the problem
and repeat the test for all compounds of in-
terest beginning with Section 8.2.3.
  8.3  The  laboratory  must,  on an ongoing
basis, spike at least 5% of the samples from
each  sample  site being monitored  to assess
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing 1 to 20
samples per month, at least one spiked sam-
ple per month is required.
  8.3.1  The concentration of the spike in the
sample  should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1.1  If,  as in  compliance  monitoring,
the concentration of a specific parameter in
the sample is being checked against a regu-
latory concentration limit, the spike should
be at that limit or 1 tn 5 times higher than
the background corii eutratlon determined in
Section 8.3.2. whiche- tr concentration  would
bf larger.
  83.12  If the cni.,,pntration  of a specific
parameter  in  the  ^atr.ple  is  not  being
checked against a limit specific to that pa-
rameter, the spike should be at 20 jig/L or 1
to 5 times higher than the background con-
centration  determined  in  Section  8.3.2,
whichever concentration would be larger.
  8.3.2  Analyze one  5-mL sample aliquot to
determine the background concentration (B)
of each parameter.  If necessary, prepare a
new QC check sample concentrate (Section
8.2.1) appropriate  for the  background con-
centrations  in the sample. Spike a second 5-
mL  sample  aliquot  with 10 nL of  the  QC
check sample concentrate and analyze it to
determine the concentration after  spiking
(A) of each  parameter.  Calculate  each per-
cent recovery (P) as  100(A-B)%/T, where T is
the known true value of the spike.
  8.3.3  Compare the  percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with the corresponding  QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 5.  These
acceptance criteria wer calculated to include
an  allowance for  error in measurement of
both the  background and  spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent that  the analyst's  spike  to  back-
ground ratio approaches S:!.1 If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than 20
Hg/L, the analyst must use  either the QC ac-
ceptance criteria in  Table 5, or  optional  QC
acceptance  criteria  calculated for  the spe-
cific spike concentration.  To calculate op-
tional acceptance criteria for the recoveryof
a  parameter:  (1)  Calculate  accuracy (X')
using the equation in Table 6, substituting
the spike concentration (T) for C;  (2) cal-
culate overall precision (S') using the equa-
tion in Table 6, substituting X' for X; (3) cal-
culate the range for recovery at  the spike
concentration as (100 X'/T)  (±2.44(100  S'/T)%.7
  8.3.4  If any individual P falls outside the
designated range for recovery, that param-
eter has failed the  acceptance criteria. A
check  standard containing each parameter
that failed the criteria  must be analyzed as
described in Section  8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
criteria for recovery in Section 8 3,  a  QC
check  standard containing each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE:  The  frequency  for  the  required
anlaysis of a QC check standard will depend
upon the number of  parameters being simul-
taneously tested, the complexity of the sam-
ple matrix,  and the  performance of the lab-
oratory.  If the entire list  of  parameters in
Table 5 must be measured in the sample in
Section 8.3,  the probability that the analysis
of a QC  check standard will  be required is
high. In this case the QC check  standard
should be routinely analyzed with the spiked
sample
  8 4.1  Prepare the  QC  check standard  by
adding 10 nL of QC check sample concentrate
(Section  82.1 or 832;  to  5 mL ol  reagent
water. The QC check standard needt> oniy to
                                          200

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
contain the parameters that failed criteria
in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2 Analyze the QC check standard to
determine the concentration measured (A) of
each  parameter.  Calculate  each percent  re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3 Compare  the percent  recovery (PO
for each  parameter with the  corresponding'
QC acceptance criteria found in Table 5. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need  to be compared with  these criteria. If
the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
side the  designated range, the laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control, and the problem  must be
immediately identified  and corrected The
analytical result for that parameter in the
unspiked  sample  is suspect and may not be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As a Quality control check, the labora-
tory must spike all samples with the surro-
gate standard spiking  solutions as described
in Section 11,4, and calculate the percent  re-
covery of each surrogate compound.
  8.6  As part of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,   method  accuracy  for  wastewater
samples must be assessed and records must
be  maintained.  After  the  analysis  of five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8._3,
calculate  the  average  percent recovery  (P)
and the standard  deviation of the percent  re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy ass_essment
as a percent recovery interval from P—2sp to
P  + 2sp.  If P=90% and sp=10%, for example,
the accuracy interval is  expressed as  70-
110%.  Update  the accuracy assessment  for
each  parameter a  regular  basis (e.g. after
each  five to  ten  new  accuracy measure-
ments).
  8.7  It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance practices
for use with this  method. The  specific prac-
tices  that are most productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
the samples. Field duplicates  may  be ana-
lyzed  to assess the precision of the environ-
mental  measurements.  Whenever  possible.
the laboratory should  analyze  standard ref-
erence materials  and participate in relevant
performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  All  samples  must be iced or refrig-
erated from  the time of collection until anal-
ysis.  If the  sample  contains residual chlo-
rine, add sodium thiosulfate preservative  (10
mg/40 mL is  sufficient for up to 5 ppm C12) to
the empty sample bottle just prior  to ship-
ping to the sampling site. EPA  Methods 330.4
and 330 5 may be used for measurement of  re-
sidual chlorine.8 Field  test kits are available
for this purpose
  9.2  Grab  samples must  be  collected  m
glass  containers having a total volume of at
least  25 mL. Fill the  sample bottle just to
overflowing in such a  manner that no air
bubbles pass through the sample as the bot-
tle is being filled. Seal  the bottle so that no
air bubbles are entrapped in it. If  preserva-
tive has been  added, shake vigorously for 1
min. Maintain the hermetic seal on the sam-
ple bottle until time of analysis.
  9.3  Experimental evidence indicates  that
some aromatic compounds, notably benzene,
toluene, and ethyl benzene are susceptible to
rapid biological  degradation under certain
environmental   conditions.3   Refrigeration
alone may not be adequate to preserve these
compounds  in  wastewaters  for  more than
seven days. For this reason, a separate sam-
ple should be  collected, acidified,  and  ana-
lyzed when  these aromatics are to  be deter-
mined.  Collect  about 500 mL of sample in a
clean container. Adjust the pH  of the sample
to about 2 by  adding 1+1 HC1 while stirring
vigorously,  Check pH with narrow range (1.4
to 2.8) pH paper  Fill a sample container as
described in Section 9.2.
  9.4  All samples must be  analyzed within
14 days of collection.3

      10. Daily GC/MS Performance Tests

  10.1  At the  beginning of each  day  that
analyses are to be performed, the GC/MS sys-
tem must  be  checked  to see  if acceptable
performance criteria are achieved for BFB.9
The performance  test must be  passed before
any samples, blanks, or standards are  ana-
lyzed,  unless the instrument  has  met  the
DFTPP test described  in Method 625 earlier
in the day.10
  10.2  These performance  tests require  the
following instrumental parameters-
  Electron Energy 70 V (nominal)
  Mass Rang-e: 20 to 260 amu
  Scan  Time:  To give  at least 5 scans  per
    peak but not to exceed 7 s per scan.
  10 3  At the beginning- of each day, inject 2
pL of BFB solution directly on the column.
Alternatively,  add 2 uL of BFB solution to
5.0 mL of reagent water or standard solution
and analyze the  solution according to sec-
tion 11. Obtain  a background-corrected mass
spectrum of BPB  and  confirm that all  the
key m/z criteria in Table 2 are achieved If
all the criteria  are not achieved, the analyst
must  retune the mass spectrometer and re-
peat the test until all  criteria  are achieved.

 11. Sample Purging and  Gas Chromatography

  11.1  Table 1 summarizes the recommended
operating  conditions   for  the  gas  chro-
matograph.  Included in this table are reten-
tion times  and MDL that can be  achieved
under these conditions. An example of  the
separations  achieved  by  this  column  is
shown in Figure 5. Other packed columns or
chromatographic  conditions may be used if
the requirements of Section 8.2 are met.
                                         201

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 624
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  11.2  After  achieving the key m/z  abun-
dance  criteria  in  Section 10, calibrate  the
system daiy as described in Section 1.
  11.3  Adjust the purge  gas  (helium) flow
rate to 40 mL/min. Attach the trap  inlet to
the purging device,  and set the purge  and
trap system to purge (Figure 3). Open the sy-
ringe valve located on the purging device
sample introduction needle.
  11.4  Allow the sample to  come to ambient
temperature prior to introducing it into the
syringe. Remove the plunger from a 5-mL sy-
ringe and attach a closed syringe valve. Open
the sample bottle (or standard) and carefully
pour the sample into  the syringe barrel to
just short  of overflowing.  Replace  the sy-
ringe plunger and compress the sample. Open
the syringe valve  and  vent  any residual air
while adjusting the sample volume to 5.0 mL.
Since this  process of taking an aliquot de-
stroys  the  validity of  the sample for future
analysis, the  analyst should fill  a second sy-
ringe at this time  to protect against  possible
loss of data. Add 10.0 |iL of  the surrogate
spiking solution (Section  6.7)  and 10.0 ]iL of
the internal standard spiking  solution (Sec-
tion 7.3.2) through the  valve bore, then close
the valve. The surrogate and internal stand-
ards may be mixed and  added as a  single
spiking solution.
  11.5  Attach the syringe-syringe valve as-
sembly to the syringe valve on the  purging
device. Open the  syringe valves and  inject
the sample  into the purging  chamber.
  11.6  Close both  valves and purge the sam-
ple for 11.0±0.1 min at  ambient temperature.
  11.7  After  the 11-min purge time, attach
the trap to the chromatograph, adjust  the
purge and  trap  system to the desorb mode
(Figure 4), and begin to temperature pro-
gram the gas chromatograph. Introduce the
trapped materials  to the GC column by rap-
idly heating  the trap  to  180  °C  while
backflushing  the trap  with  an inert gas be-
tween  20 and 60 mL/min for 4 min.  If rapid
heating of  the  trap cannot  be achieved, the
GC cloumn must be used as  a secondary trap
by cooling  it to 30 °C  (subambient tempera-
ture, if problems persist)  instead of the  ini-
tial program temperature of 45 °C.
  11.8  While  the trap is being desorbed into
the gas chromatograph, empty  the  purging
chamber  using the sample  introduction sy-
ringe.  Wash  the  chamber  with two 5-mL
flushes of reagent water.
  11.9  After desorbing the sample for 4 min,
recondition the trap by returning the purge
and trap system to the purge  mode. Wait 15
s then  close the syringe valve on the purging
device  to begin gas flow  through the trap.
The trap temperature  should be maintained
at 180  °C. After approximately  7  min, turn
off the trap heater and  open  the  syringe
valve to  stop the gas flow through the trap.
When the trap is  cool, the  next sample  can
be analyzed.
  11.10  If the response for any m/z exceeds
the working range of the system, prepare a
dilution of the  sample with reagent water
from  the aliquot in  the second syringe and
reanalyze.

        12. Qualitative Identification
  12.1  Obtain EICPs  for the  primary m/z
(Table 4) and at least two secondary masses
for each parameter of interest. The following
criteria must be met to make  a qualitative
identification:
  12.1.1  The  characteristic  masses  of each
parameter of interest must maximize in the
same or within one scan of each other.
  12.1.2  The retention time must fall within
±30 s  of the retention time of the authentic
compound.
  12.1.3  The  relative  peak  heights  of the
three characteristic  masses in  the EICPs
must fall within ±20% of the relative inten-
sities of these  masses  in a reference mass
spectrum. The reference mass spectrum can
be obtained from a standard analyzed in the
GC/MS system or from a reference library.
  12.2  Structural  isomers that  have very
similar mass spectra and less than 30 s dif-
ference in retention time, can be explicitly
identified only if the resolution between au-
thentic isomers  in a standard mix is accept-
able. Acceptable resolution is achieved if the
baseline to valley height between the iso-
mers  is less than 25% of the sum of the two
peak  heights. Otherwise, structural isomers
are identified as isomeric pairs.

              13. Calculations
  13.1  When  a  parameter has been identi-
fied,  the quantitation  of  that parameter
should be based  on the integrated abundance
from  the EICP of the primary characteristic
m/z given in Table 4. If the sample produces
an interference  for  the  primary m/z,  use a
secondary characteristic m/z to quantitate.
  Calculate the  concentration in the sample
using the response factor (RF) determined in
Section 7.3.3 and Equation 2.
    Concentration (|0.g/L) =
(A.XC.,)
(A1S)(RF)
                                Equation 2

where:
As=Area of the characteristic m/z for the pa-
  rameter or surrogate standard to be meas-
  ured.
A,b=Area of the characteristic m/z for the in-
  ternal standard.
C,^Concentration of the internal sta-ndard.
  13.2  Report results in \igfL without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.
                                          202

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
           14. Method Performance

  14.1  The method detection limit (MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99%  confidence that the value is above
zero.1  The  MDL  concentrations   listed  in
Table 1 were obtained using reagent water.11
Similar  results were achieved  using rep-
resentative wastewaters The MDL actually
achieved in a given  analysis will vary de-
pending- on instrument sensitivity and ma-
trix effects.
  14.2  This method was tested by 15 labora-
tories  using reagent  water, drinking water,
surface water, and  industrial wastewaters
spiked at six  concentrations over the range
5-600 |ig/L.12Single  operator precision, overall
precision, and method accuracy were found
to be directly  related to the concentration of
the parameter and essentially independent of
the sample matrix. Linear equations to de-
scribe  these relationships are  presented in
Table 5.

               REFERENCES

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2 Bellar, T.A.. and Lichtenberg, J.J. "De-
termining  Volatile Organics at Microgram-
per-Litre  Levels  by  Gas  Chromatography,"
Journal American Water Works Association, 66,
739 (1974).
  3.  Bellar,   T A.,  and  Lichtenberg,  J J.
"Semi-Automated  Headspace  Analysis  of
Drinking  Waters and Industrial Waters for
Purgeable  Volatile  Organic Compounds,  "
Measurement  of Organic Pollutants in Water
and  Wastewater,  C.E.  Van   Hall,  editor,
American Society  for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, PA. Special Technical Publica-
tion 686, 1978.
  4  "Carcinogens—Working  With  Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Public  Health Service,  Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206,  August 1977.
  5. "OSHA Safety  and Health  Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR part 1910),  Occu-
pational Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976)
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion,  Committee  on  Chemical Safety,  3rd
Edition, 1979.
  7. Provost, L.P.,  and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation  of Percent  Recovery Data," American
Laboratory,  15, 58-63  (1983).  (The value 2.44
used in the equation  in Section 8.2.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  8. "Methods  330.4 (Titrimetric,  DPD-FAS)
and  330.5  (Spectrophotometric,  DPD)  for
Chlorine,   Total   Residual,"  Methods  for
Chemical  Analysis  of  Water  and Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020,  U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and  Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati, Ohio
45268, March 1979
  9.  Budde,  W.L.,  and  Eichelberger, J.W.
"Performance Tests for the Evaluation  of
Computerized  Eas  Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry Equipment and Laboratories,"
EPA-600/4-80-025,  U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and  Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati, Ohio
45268, April 1980.
  10   Eichelberger,  J.W., Harris,  L.E., and
Budde, W.L.  "Reference  Compound to Cali-
brate Ion Abundance  Measurement in Gas
Chromatography—Mass  Spectrometry Sys-
tems," Analytical Chemistry, 47, 995-1000 (1975).
  11. "Method Detection Limit for Methods
624 and 625," Olynyk,  P., Budde,  W.L., and
Eichelberger, J.W. Unpublished report, May
14, 1980.
  12.  "EPA Method  Study 29 EPA  Method
624—Purgeables,"  EPA 600/4-84-054, National
Technical Information Service, PB84-209915,
Springfield, Virginia 22161. June 1984.
  13."Method  Performance  Data for  Method
624," Memorandum  from R.  Slater  and  T.
Pressley,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268. Jan-
uary 17, 1984

TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND
         METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Tnchlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 ,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,1 ,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachlonde
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloroproane
cis-1 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,1 ,2-Tnchloroethane
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinlyl ether
Bromoform
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
TetrachJoroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene .
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Retention
time (mm)
23
31
38
46
64
83
90
101
108
11 4
121
134
137
143
157
159
165
170
17 1
172
172
186
198
221
222
235
246
264
339
350
Method
detection
limit (ng/L)
nd
nd
nd
nd
28
nd
28
47
1 6
1 6
28
38
28
22
60
50
1 9
44
31
50
nd
nd
47
69
41
60
60
72
nd
nd
                                         203

-------
Pt. 136, App. A.Meth. 624
        40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
TABLE 1—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND
    METHOD DETECTION LIMITS—Continued
TABLE 4—CHARACTERISTIC MASSES FOR
         PURGEABLE ORGANICS
1
Parameter Retention


1,4-Dichlorobenzene . 354
Method
detection
limit (jig/L)

nd
Column conditions Carbopak B (60/80 mesh) coated with
1% SP-1000 packed in a 6 ft by 0 1 in ID glass column with
helium earner gas at 30 mL/mm flow rate Column tempera-
ture held at 45°C for 3 mm , then programmed at 8°C/mm to
220°C and held for 15 mm
nd=not determined

TABLE 2 — BFB KEY M/Z ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
Mass
50
75
95

96
173
174
175
176

177
m/z Abundance criteria
1 5 to 40% of mass 95
30 to 60% of mass 95
Base Peak. 100% Relative
Abundance
5 to 9% of mass 95
<2%of mass 174
>50% of mass 95
5 to 9% of mass 1 74
>95% but <101% of mass
174
5 to 9% of mass 176

TABLE 3 — SUGGESTED SURROGATE AND
INTERNAL STANDARDS


Compound


Benzene d-6
4-Bromofluorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane d-4
1 ,4-Difluorobenzene
Ethylbenzene d-5
Ethylbenzene d-10
Fluorobenzene
Pentafluorobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Reten- p
ton ™
(mm)" mfe

170 84
283 95
121 102
196 114
26 4 111
264 98
184 96
235 168
93 128

Secondary



174, 176

63, 88
70
49, 130, 51

Parameter

Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane

trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1.1,1 -Tnchloroethane
Carbon tetrachlonde
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Dibromochloromethane

Pri-
mary

50
94
62
64
84
101
96
63

96
83
98
97
117
127
112
75
130
78
127
OT
I
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75
2-Chloroethylvmyl ether



1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethene

Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
106
173


168

164

92
112
106
146
146
146

Secondary

52
96
64
66
49, 51 , and 86
103
61 and 98
65, 83, 85, 98,
and 100.
61 and 98
85
62, 64, and 100
99, 117, and 119.
119 and 121
83,85, and 129
63, 65, and 114
77
95, 97, and 132

129, 208, and
206
83 85 99 1 32
and '134
77
63 and 65
171 , 175 250
252, 254. and
256
83, 85, 131, 133,
and 166
129, 131, and
166
91
114
91
148 and 113
148 and 113
148 and 113
  ' For chromatographic conditions, see Table 1

              TABLE 5—CALIBRATION AND QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 624j
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachionde
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvmyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichlorothene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
eter





Range for Q
(u/g/L)
128-272
13 1-269
142-258
28-372
146-254
132-268
7 6 - 32 4
D-448
] 135-265
! D-408






135-265
126-27.4
146-254
126-274
145-255
136-264
101-299
139-261
Limit for
s (u/g/L)
69
64
54
179
52
63
11 4
259
6 1
Range for X
(u/g/L)
152-260
101-280
11 4-31 1
D-41 2
172-235
164-274
84-404
D-504
137-242
198 j D-459
61
71
55
7 1
51
60
9 1
57
138-266
118-347
170-288
11 8-347
142-285
143-274
37-423
136-285
                                Flange for P,
                                  P. (%)

                                    37-151
                                    35-155
                                    45-169
                                     D-242
                                    70-140
                                    37-160
                                    14-230
                                     D-305
                                    51-138
                                     D-273
                                    53-149
                                    18-190
                                    59-156
                                    18-190
                                    59-155
                                    49-155
                                     D-234
                                    54-156
                                             204

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
         TABLE 5—CALIBRATION AND QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 624a—Continued
Parameter
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
trans- 1 ,3-Dichtoropropene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetracbloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1 1 1 -Tnchloroethane
1,1,2-Tnchloroethane
Tnchloroethene
Tnchlorofluoromethane 	
Vinyl chloride
Range for Q

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
                 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
      OPTIONAL
      FOAM
      TRAP
 EXIT 1/4 IN.
     0. D.

— 14MM 0. D.

INLET J4 IN.
     0. D.
   1/4 IN.
   0. D. EXIT
    SAMPLE INLET

    2-WAY SYRINGE VALVE
    •17CM. 20 GAUGE SYRINGE NEEDLE

    6MM. 0.  D. RUBBER SEPTUM
                                  . 0. D.     1/16 IN. O.D.
                                         \y STAINLESS STEEL
                               -INLET
                               '/4 IN. 0. D.
                                            13X MOLECULAR
                                            SIEVE PURGE
                                            GAS FILTER
                                              PURGE GAS
                                           •*"1FLOW
     10MM GLASS FRIT
     MEDIUM POROSITY
                                              CONTROL
                  Figure 1. Purging device.
                             206

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
      PACKING PROCEDURE
     GLASS _.,,,
     WOOL 5MIVI
 GRADE 15
 SILICA GEL8CWI
   TENAX 15CM
  3% OV-1 1CIW
  GLASS
  WOOL
5MM

 m
TRAP INLET
                     CONSTRUCTION
                                 COMPRESSION
                                 FITTING NUT
                                 AND FERRULES
                                  14FT. 7^/FOOT
                                  RESISTANCE  WIRE
                                  WRAPPED SOLID
                                   THERMOCOUPLE/
                                 _ CONTROLLER
                                   SENSOR
                                           TUBING 25CM
                                           0.105 IN. I.D.
                                           0.125 IN. O.D.
                                           STAINLESS STEEL
       Figure 2. Trap packings and construction to include
               desorb capability.
                            207

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 624
                  40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    CARRIER GAS FLOW CONTROL
   PRESSURE REGULATOR
   PURGE GAS
   FLOW CONTROL \|
   13X MOLECULAR
   SIEVE FILTER
  LIQUID INJECTION PORTS
                    COLUMN OVEN
                                                 CONFIRMATORY COLUMN
                                               TO DETECTOR
                                               ^-ANALYTICAL COLUMN
         OPTIONAL 4-PORT COLUMN
  e „„ , SELECTION VALVE
  6-PORT    TRAP |NLET
              RESISTANCE WIRE
                                          TRAP
                                          22-C
                                                            CONTROL
                                       PURGING
                                       DEVICE
                   Note:ALL LINES BETWEEN
                       TRAP AND GC
                       SHOULD BE HEATED
                       TO80*C
            Figure 3. Purge and trap system - purge mode.
             CARRIER GAS
             FLOW CONTROL
      PRESSURE
      REGULATOR,
    PURGE GAS       ,
    FLOW CONTROL   , ,
LIQUID INJECTION PORTS
     13X MOLECULAR
     SIEVE FILTER
       OPTIONAL 4-PORT COLUMN
       SELECTION VALVE
  6-PORT  TRAP INLET
  VALVE   I RESISTANCE WIRE
                                       PURGING
                                       DEVICE
                   COLUMN OVEN
                     CONFIRMATORY COLUMN
                 >TU DETECTOR
                I" ~-ANALYTICAL COLUMN
                                                      HEATER
                                                      CONTROL
                      Note:
                      ALL LINES BETWEEN
                      TRAP AND GC
                      SHOULD BE HEATED
                      TO 95°C.
           Figure 4.  Purge and trap system - desorb mode.
                                  208

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 625
   COLUMN: 1% SP-1000 ON CARBOPACK-B
   PROGRAM  45°C FOR 3 MIN, 8°C/MIN TO 220°C
   DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
                                           16
                                                                  24
                                                                        26
                                                                             28
                                 RETENTION TIME, MIN.

  Figure 5.  Gas chromatogram of volatile organics.
   METHOD 625—BASE/NEUTRALS AND ACIDS

         1. Scope and Application

  1.1  This method covers the determination
of a number of organic compounds that are
partitioned into an organic solvent and are
amenable to gas  chromatography. The pa-
rameters listed in Tables 1 and 2 may be
qualitatively and quantitatively determined
using this method.
  1.2  The  method may  be  extended to in-
clude the parameters listed in Table 3. Benzi-
dine can be subject to oxidative losses during
solvent  concentration. Under the alkaline
conditions of the extraction step. a-BHC, f-
BHC, endosulfan I and II, and endrin are sub-
ject          to          decomposition
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene  is  subject  to
thermal decomposition in the inlet of the gas
chromatograph, chemical  reaction in ace-
tone solution, and photochemical decomposi-
tion. N-nitrosodimethylamine  is difficult to
separate  from  the  solvent  under  the
chromatographic  conditions  described  N-
nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes in the gas
chromatographic inlet and  cannot  be  sepa-
rated from  diphenylamine.  The  preferred
method for each of these parameters is listed
in Table 3.
  1.3  This is  a  gas chromatographic/mass
spectrometry (GC'MS) method2-14 applicable
to the determination of the compounds listed
in Tables 1, 2, and 3 in municipal and indus-
trial discharges as provided under 40 CFR
136.1.
                                       209

-------
Pt.  136, App. A.Meth. 625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  1.4  The method detection limit (MDL, de-
fined in Section 16.1) * for each parameter is
listed in Tables 4 and 5. The MDL for a spe-
cific wastewater may differ from those list-
ed,  depending  upon the  nature of  inter-
ferences in the sample matrix.
  1.5  Any modification to this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered as a major  modification subject to
application  and approval  of  alternate test
procedures under 40  CFR 136.4 and 136.5. De-
pending upon the nature of the modification
and the extent of intended use, the applicant
may be  required  to demonstrate that the
modifications will produce equivalent results
when applied to relevant wastewaters.
  1.6  This method is restricted to use by or
under  the supervision of analysts  experi-
enced  in  the use of a gas chromatograph/
mass spectrometer and in the interpretation
of mass spectra.  Each analyst must  dem-
onstrate the ability to generate acceptable
results with this method using the procedure
described in Section  8.2.

           2. Summary of Method
  2.1 A measured volume of sample, approxi-
mately 1-L, is serially extracted with meth-
ylene chloride at  a  pH greater than 11 and
again at a pH less than 2 using a separatory
funnel or a continuous extractor.2 The meth-
ylene chloride extract is dried, concentrated
to a volume of 1 mL, and analyzed by GC/MS.
Qualitative identification of the parameters
in the extract is performed using the reten-
tion  time and  the  relative  abundance of
three  characteristic  masses  (m/z).   Quan-
titative analysis is performed using internal
standard  techniques  with a single char-
acteristic m/z.

              3. Interferences

  3.1  Method interferences may  be  caused
by contaminants in solvents,  reagents, glass-
ware, and other sample processing hardware
that lead to discrete  artifacts and/or  ele-
vated baselines in the total ion current pro-
files.  All of these materials must  be rou-
tinely  demonstrated to be free from inter-
ferences under the conditions of the analysis
by running laboratory reagent blanks as de-
scribed in Section 8.1.3.
  3.1.1  Glassware   must   be  scrupulously
cleaned.3 Clean all glassware as soon as pos-
sible after use  by rinsing with the last sol-
vent used in it.  Solvent rinsing should be fol-
lowed  by detergent washing with hot water,
and  rinses  with  tap  water  and distilled
water. The glassware should then be drained
dry, and heated in a muffle furnace at 400 °C
for 15 to 30 min. Some  thermally stable ma-
terials, such as PCBs, may not be eliminated
by this treatment. Solvent rinses with ace-
tone and pesticide  quality hexane  may be
substituted for  the  muffle furnace heating.
Thmrough rinsing with such solvents usually
eliminates  PCB  interference.  Volumetric
ware should not be heated in a muffle fur-
nace.  After drying and cooling,  glassware
should be sealed and stored in a clean envi-
ronment to  prevent  any  accumulation  of
dust or other contaminants. Store inverted
or capped with aluminum foil.
  3.1.2  The use  of high purity reagents and
solvents helps to minimize  interference prob-
lems. Purification of solvents by distillation
in all-glass systems may be required.
  3.2  Matrix interferences may be caused by
contaminants that are co-extracted from the
sample. The extent of  matrix interferences
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending upon  the nature and  diversity of
the industrial complex or municipality being
sampled.
  3.3  The base-neutral extraction may cause
significantly reduced recovery of  phenol, 2-
methylphenol, and 2,4-dimethylphenol. The
analyst must recognize that results obtained
under  these  conditions  are  minimum con-
centrations.
  3.4  The packed gas  chromatographic col-
umns recommended for the basic  fraction
may not exhibit sufficient resolution for cer-
tain isomeric pairs including the  following:
anthracene and  phenanthrene; chrysene and
benzo(a)anthracene;                    and
benzo(b)fluoranthene                   and
benzo(k)fluoranthene.        The        gas
chromatographic retention time  and mass
spectra for these pairs of compounds are not
sufficiently different  to make an unambig-
uous identification.  Alternative  techniques
should be used to identify and quantify these
specific compounds, such as Method 610.
  3.5  In samples that contain an inordinate
number of interferences, the use of chemical
ionization (CI) mass spectrometry may make
identification easier. Tables 6  and 7 give
characteristic CI ions  for  most of the com-
pounds covered by this method. The use of CI
mass spectrometry to  support electron ion-
ization (El) mass spectrometry is encouraged
but not required.

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity  of
each reagent  used in this  method have  not
been precisely defined; however, each chem-
ical compound should be treated as a poten-
tial health hazard. From this viewpoint, ex-
posure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The laboratory  is responsible for
maintaining  a  current awareness file  of
OSHA  regulations regarding  the  safe  han-
dling of the  chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material data handling
sheets should also be made available  to  all
personnel involved in the chemical analysis.
Additional references  to  laboratory safety
are available and have been identified4-6 for
the information  of the analyst.
                                          210

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
  4.2  The  following parameters covered by
this method have been tentatively classified
as known or suspected,  human or mamma-
lian carcinogens: benzo(a)anthracene,  benzi-
dine,  3,3'-dichlorobenzidme,  benzo(a)pyrene,
a-BHC,     |}-BHC,      S-BHC,      T^-BHC,
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene,                  N-
nitrosodimethylamine,  4,4'-DDT,  and poly-
chlorinated  biphenyls   (PCBs).   Primary
standards of these toxic compounds should
be prepared in a hood. A NIOSH/MESA ap-
proved toxic gas respirator  should be worn
when  the analyst handles high concentra-
tions of these toxic compounds.

         5. Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling equipment,  for discrete or
composit sampling.
  5.1.1  Grab  sample  bottle—1-L  or  1-gt,
amber glass, fitted  with a screw cap lined
with Tenon. Foil may be substituted for Tef-
lon if the sample  is not corrosive. If  amber
bottles are not available,  protect  samples
from light. The bottle and cap liner must be
washed, rinsed with acetone or methylene
chloride, and  dried  before use  to minimize
contamination.
  5.1.2  Automatic  sampler  (optional)—The
sampler must  incorporate glass sample con-
tainers for the collection of a minimum of
250 mL of sample. Sample containers must be
kept refrigerated at 4 °C and protected from
light during compositing. If the sampler uses
a  peristaltic pump, a  minimum  length of
compressible silicone rubber tubing may be
used,  before use, however, the compressible
tubing  should  be  throughly  rinsed  with
methanol, followed by repeated rinsings with
distilled water to minimize the potential for
contamination of the sample. An integrating
flow meter is required to collect flow propor-
tional composites.
  5.2  Glassware (All specifications are sug-
gested. Catalog numbers are included  for il-
lustration only.)'
  5.2.1  Separatory funnel—2-L, with Teflon
stopcock.
  5.2.2  Drying   column—Chromatographic
column, 19 mm ID, with coarse frit
  5.2.3  Concentrator  tube,   Kuderna-Dan-
ish—10-mL,  graduated (Kontes K-570050-1025
or equivalent). Calibration must be checked
at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass stopper is used to prevent evaporation
of extracts.
  5.2.4  Evaporative  flask, Kuderna-Danish—
500-mL  (Kontes K-57001-0500 or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.
  5.2.5  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Three  all  macro  (Kontes  K-503000-0121  or
equivalent).
  5.2.6  Snyder  column,  Kuderna-Danish—
Two-ball  macro   (Kontes K-569001-0219  or
equivalent).
  5.2.7  Vials—10 to 15-mL, amber glass, with
Teflon-lined screw cap.
  528  Continuous liquid—liquid extractor—
Equipped with Teflon  or glass  connecting
joints and stopcocks requiring no  lubrica-
tion.  (Hershberg-Wolf Extractor,  Ace Glass
Company,  Vineland, N.J., P/N   6841-10  or
equivalent.)
  5.3  Boiling  chips—Approximately  10/40
mesh. Heat to 400 °C  for 30 mm of Soxhlet ex-
tract with methylene chloride.
  5.4  Water  bath—Heated, with  concentric
ring cover,  capable  of  temperature  control
(±2°C). The bath should be used in a hood.
  5.5  Balance—Analytical, capable  of accu-
rately weighing 0.0001 g.
  5.6  GC/MS system:
  5.6.1  Gas  Chromatograph—An  analytical
system complete  with  a  temperature pro-
grammable  gas chromatograph and all re-
quired accessores including syringes, analyt-
ical columns, and gases. The injection port
must be designed for  on-column injection
when using packed columns and for splitless
injection when using capillary columns.
  5.6.2  Column for base/neutrals—1.8 m long
x 2  mm ID glass, packed with 3% SP-2250 on
Supelcoport  (100/120  mesh) or  equivalent.
This column was used to develop the method
performance   statements   in  Section  16.
Guidelines  for the use  of alternate column
packings are provided in Section 13.1.
  5.6.3  Column for acids—1.8 m long x 2 mm
ID  glass, packed with 1%  SP-1240DA on
Supelcoport  (100/120  mesh) or  equivalent.
This column  was used to develop the method
performance   statements   in  Section  16.
Guidelines  for the use  of alternate column
packings are given in Section 13.1
  5.6.4  Mass spectrometer—Capable of scan-
ning from 35  to 450 amu every 7 s or less, uti-
lizing a 70 V (nominal) electron energy in the
electron impact ionization mode, and pro-
ducing' a mass spectrum which meets all the
criteria  in   Table   9  when  50   ng   of
decafluorotriphenyl   phosphine    (DPTPP,
bis(perfluorophenyl)  phenyl phosphine) is in-
jected through the GC inlet.
  5.6.5  GC/MS interface—Any  GC   to  MS
interface that gives acceptable  calibration
points at 50 ng per injection for each of the
parameters of  interest  and achieves all ac-
ceptable performance  criteria (Section 12)
may  be used  GC  to  MS interfaces  con-
structed of all  glass  or  glass-lined materials
are recommended. Glass can be deactivated
by silanizing with dichlorodimethylsilane.
  5.6.6  Data  system—A  computer  system
must be interfaced to the mass spectrometer
that  allows  the contiluous acquisition and
storage on  machine-readable media of all
mass spectra obtained throughout the dura-
tion of the Chromatographic program. The
computer must have software  that allows
searching any GC/MS data file for specific m/
z and plotting such m/z abundances versus
time or scan number. This type of plot is de-
fined as an  Extracted  Ion Current Profile
(EICP). Software must also be available that
                                         211

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
allows integrating the  abundance in any
EICP between specified time or scan number
limits

                6. Reagents

  6.1  Reagent water—Reagent water  is de-
fined as  a water in which an interferent is
not observed at  the MDL of the parameters
of interest.
  6.2  Sodium hydroxide  solution (10 N)—
Dissolve  40 g of NaOH (ACS) in reagent water
and dilute to 100 mL.
  6.3  Sodium thiosulfate—(ACS) Granular.
  6.4  Sulfuric acid (1+1)—Slowly,  add  50 mL
of H2SO4 (ACS, sp. gr. 1.84)  to 50 mL of rea-
gent water
  6.5  Acetone, methanol,  methlylene chlo-
ride—Pesticide quality or equivalent.
  6.6  Sodium sulfate—(ACS) Granular,  an-
hydrous.  Purify  by heating at 400 °C for 4 h
in a shallow tray.
  6.7  Stock standard solutions (1.00 ng/|J.L)—
standard solutions can be prepared from pure
standard materials or purchased as certified
solutions.
  6.7.1 Prepare  stock standard solutions by
accurately weighing  about 0.0100  g of pure
material. Dissolve the material in pesticide
quality acetone or other suitable solvent and
dilute to  volume in a  10-mL  volumetric
flask. Larger volumes can be used at the con-
venience of the analyst. When compound pu-
rity  is assayed  to be 96%  or greater,  the
weight may be  used  without correction to
calculate the concentration of  the  stock
standard.  Commercially   prepared   stock
standards may be used at any concentration
if they are certified by the manufacturer or
by an independent source.
  6.7.2 Transfer  the   stock standard solu-
tions into Teflon-sealed  screw-cap bottles.
Store at  4 °C and protect from light  Stock
standard  solutions should  be  checked  fre-
quently  for signs of  degradation  or evapo-
ration,  especially oust prior to  preparing
calibration standards  from them.
  6.7.3 Stock standard solutions must be re-
placed after six  months,  or sooner if com-
parison with quality  control check samples
indicate  a problem.
  6 8  Surrogate standard spiking  solution —
Select a  minimum of three surrogate com-
pounds from Table 8. Prepare  a  surrogate
standard  spiking solution  containing each
selected  surrogate compound at a concentra-
tion of 100 jig/mL in acetone. Addition  of 1.00
mL of this solution to 1000 mL of sample is
equivalent to a  concentration of 100 |ig/L of
each  surrogate standard.  Store the spiking
solution  at 4 °C  in Teflon-sealed  glass con-
tainer. The solution  should be checked  fre-
quently for stability.  The solution must be
replaced  after six months, or sooner if com-
parison with quality control check standards
indicates a problem.
  6.9  DFTPP  standard—Prepare a 25  jig/mL
solution  of DPTPP in  acetone.
  6.10  Quality control check  sample  con-
centrate—See Section 8.2.1

               7. Calibration

  7.1  Establish  gas chromatographic oper-
ating parameters  equivalent to those indi-
cated in Table 4 or 5.
  7.2  Internal standard  calibration proce-
dure—To use this approach, the analyst must
select three or more internal standards that
are similar  in analytical behavior  to  the
compounds of interest. The analyst must fur-
ther demonstrate  that the  measurement of
the internal  standards is  not affected  by
method or matrix  interferences. Some rec-
ommended internal standards  are  listed in
Table 8.  Use the base peak m/z as  the  pri-
mary m/z for quantification of the standards.
If interferences  are noted, use one of the
next  two most  intense m/z quantities for
quantification.
  7.2.1  Prepare  calibration standards at  a
minimum of three concentration  levels for
each parameter of interest by adding appro-
priate volumes of  one or  more stock stand-
ards to a volumetric flask.  To  each calibra-
tion standard or  standard mixture, add  a
known constant amount of one or more in-
ternal standards, and  and dilute to volume
with acetone. One  of the calibration stand-
ards should be at  a concentration near, but
above, the MDL and  the other concentra-
tions  should correspond  to  the  expected
range  of concentrations found in  real sam-
ples or should define  the working  range of
the GC'MS system
  7.2.2 Using injections of 2 to 5 uL. analyze
each calibration standard according to Sec-
tion 13 and tabulate the area of the  primary
characteristic m/z  (Tables 4 and 5) ag'amst
concentration for each compound and inter-
nal standard. Calculate response factors (RF)
for each compound using Equation 1.
             RF =
(A.XC..)
(A,)(CS)
                                Equation 1
where:
A^=Area of the characteristic m/z for the pa-
  rameter to be measured.
A]s=Area of the characteristic m/z for the in-
  ternal standard.
C,,=Concentration of the internal  standard
  (ug/L).
C^=Concentration  of the parameter to  be
  measured (|Jg/L)
If the RF value  over the working range is a
constant (<35% RSD), the RF can be assumed
to be invariant  and the average RF can be
used for  calculations Alternatively, the re-
sults can be used to plot a calibration curve
of response ratios, AS/A,S, vs  RF.
  7.3  The working calibration curve or RF
must be verified on each working day by the
                                          212

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
measurement  of one  or  more  calibration
standards. If the response for any parameter
varies from the predicted  response by more
than  ±20%, the test must  be repeated uning
a fresh calibration standard. Alternatively, a
new calibration curve must be prepared for
that compound.

             8 Quality Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate  a  formal quality con-
trol program. The minimum requirements of
this program consist of an initial demonstra-
tion of laboratory capability and an ongoing
analysis of  spiked  samples to evaluate  and
document data quality. The laboratory must
maintain records to document the quality of
data that is generated. Ongoing data quality
checks are  compared  with established per-
formance criteria to determine if the results
of analyses meet the performance character-
istics of the method. When results of sample
spikes  indicate atypical  method  perform-
ance, a quality control check standard must
be  analyzed to  confirm that the  measure-
ments were performed in an in-control mode
of operation.
  8.1.1  The analyst must make an  initial,
one-time, demonstration of the ability to
generate acceptable accuracy and  precision
with this method. This ability is established
as described in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2  In recognition of advances that are
occuring in chromatography,  the analyst is
permitted certain options (detailed in Sec-
tions 10.6 and  13.1) to improve the separa-
tions  or lower the cost of measurements.
Each time such a  modification  is made to
the method, the analyst is required to repeat
the procedure in Section  8.2.
  8.1.3  Before processing  any samples,  the
analyst must analyze a reagent water blank
to demonstrate that interferences  from the
analytical  system and glassware are under
control.  Each time a  set  of samples  is ex-
tracted or  reagents are  changed, a reagent
water blank must  be processed as a safe-
guard against laboratory contamination.
  8.1.4  The laboratory must,  on  an ongoing
basis, spike  and analyze a minimum of 5% of
all samples  to monitor and evaluate labora-
tory  data  quality.  This  procedure  is  de-
scribed in Section 8.3.
  8.1.5 The  laboratory must,  on  an ongoing
basis,  demonstrate  through the analyses of
quality control check standards that the op-
eration of the measurement system is in con-
trol. This procedure is described in Section
8.4. The frequency  of the check  standard
analyses is  equivalent to 5%  of all samples
analyzed but may be reduced if spike recov-
eries  from  samples (Section 8.3)  meet all
specified quality control criteria.
  8.1.6 The  laboratory must  maintain per-
formance records to document the quality of
data that is generated. This procedure is de-
scribed in Section 8.5.
  8.2  To  establish the ability  to generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the ana-
lyst must perform the following operations.
  8.2.1 A quality control  (QC) check sample
concentrate is required containing each pa-
rameter of interest at a concentration of 100
ug/mL in acetone Multiple solutions may be
required.  PCBs  and multicomponent pes-
ticides may be omitted from this test. The
QC check  sample concentrate must be ob-
tained from the U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Environmental Monitoring and
Support  Laboratory in Cincinnati,  Ohio, if
available  If not available from  that source,
the QC check sample concentrate must be
obtained from another external source. If not
available  from  either source above, the QC
check sample concentrate must be prepared
by the laboratory using stock standards pre-
pared independently from  those used for cali-
bration.
  8.2.2 Using a pipet, prepare QC check sam-
ples at a concentration of 100 |j,g/L by adding
1.00 mL of QC check sample concentrate to
each of four 1-L aliquots of reagent water.
  8.2.3 Analyze  the  well-mixed  QC  check
samples according to the method beginning
in Section 10 or 11.
  8.2.4 Calculate the average recovery (X) in
|ig/L,  and the standard deviation of the re-
covery (s) in jig/L, for each  parameter using
the four results
  8.2.5 For each parameter  compare s and X
with  the  corresponding acceptance  criteria
for precision and  accuracy,  respectively,
found in Table 6. If s and X for all param-
eters  of  interest meet  the  acceptance  cri-
teria, the system performance is acceptable
and analysis  of actual samples can begin. If
any individual s exceeds the precision limit
or any individual X falls outside the range
for accuracy, the system  performance is un-
acceptable for that parameter
  NOTE: The  large number of parameters in
Table  6  present a  substantial  probability
that one  or more will fail at least one  of the
acceptance criteria when  all parameters are
analyzed
  8.2.6 When one or more of the parameters
tested fail at least one of  the acceptance cri-
teria, the analyst must proceed according to
Section 8.2.6.1 or 8.2.6.2.
  8.2.6.1  Locate and correct the source of
the problem  and repeat the test for all pa-
rameters of interest beginning with Section
8.2.2
  8.2.6.2  Beginning with Section 8.2.2, repeat
the  test  only  for  those parameters  that
failed  to  meet  criteria.  Repeated  failure,
however,  will  confirm a general  problem
with the measurement system. If this occurs,
locate and correct the source of the problem
and repeat the test for all compounds of in-
terest beginning with Section 8.2.2.
  8.3  The  laboratory must, on an  ongoing
basis, spike at least 5% of the samples from
each sample  site being monitored to assess
                                         213

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
accuracy. For laboratories analyzing 1 to 20
samples per month, at least one spiked sam-
ple per month is required.
  8.3.1.  The  concentration  of  the spike in
the sample should be determined as follows:
  8.3.1  If, as in compliance monitoring,  the
concentration of a specific parameter in  the
sample is being checked against a regulatory
concentration limit, the spike should be at
that limit or 1  to 5 times  higher than  the
background  concentration   determined   in
Section 8.3.2, whichever concentration would
be larger.
  8.3.1.2  If the  concentration  of  a specific
parameter in  the  sample is  not  being
checked  against a limit  specific to that  pa-
rameter. the  spike should be at 100 |ig/L or 1
to 5  times higher than the background con-
centration  determined  in  Section  8.3 2.
whichever concentration would be larger.
  8.3.1.3  If it is impractical  to  determine
background levels before spiking (e.g.. max-
imum holding times  will be exceeded),  the
spike concentration should be (1) the regu-
latory concentration limit, if any;  or, if none
(2) the larger of either 5 times higher than
the  expected  background  concentration or
  8.3.2 Analyze one sample aliquot to deter-
mine the background concentration (B) of
each parameter. If  necessary, prepare a new
QC check sample concentrate (Section 8.2.1)
appropriate for the background concentra-
tions in  the sample. Spike a second  sample
aliquot with 1.0 mL of the QC check  sample
concentrate and analyze it to determine the
concentration after spiking (A) of each pa-
rameter. Calculate each percent recovery (P)
as 100(A-B)%/T, where T is the known true
value of the spike.
  8.3.3 Compare the percent recovery (P) for
each parameter with the corresponding QC
acceptance criteria found in Table 6. These
acceptance criteria were calculated  to in-
clude an allowance  for error in measurement
of both the background  and spike concentra-
tions, assuming a spike to background ratio
of 5:1. This error will be accounted for to the
extent that  the analyst's spike  to back-
ground ratio approaches 5:1. 7 If spiking was
performed at a concentration lower than 100
Hg/L, the analyst must use either the QC ac-
ceptance criteria in Table 6, or optional QC
acceptance criteria calculated for the spe-
cific spike concentration. To calculate op-
tional acceptance criteria for the recovery of
a  parameter:   (1)  Calculate  accuracy (X')
using the equation in Table 7,  substituting
the spike concentration  (T) for C; (2) cal-
culate overall precision  (S') using the equa-
tion in Table 7, substituting X' for X;  (3) cal-
culate the range for  recovery at the spike
concentration as (100 X7T)±2.44(100 S'/T)%7
  8.3.4 If any individual P falls outside the
designated range for  recovery, that  param-
eter has failed the acceptance criteria. A
check  standard containing each parameter
that failed the criteria must be analyzed as
described in Section 8.4.
  8.4  If any parameter fails the acceptance
criteria for recovery  in Section  8.3,  a QC
check  standard containing each parameter
that failed must be prepared and analyzed.
  NOTE' The frequency for the required anal-
ysis of a QC check standard will depend upon
the number  of parameters  being  simulta-
neously tested, the complexity of the sample
matrix, and the performance of the labora-
tory  If the entire  list of  single-component
parameters in Table 6 must  be measured in
the sample  in Section 8.3,  the probability
that the analysis of a QC check standard will
be required is high. In this case the QC check
standard should be routinely analyzed with
the spike sample.
  8.4.1  Prepare the QC check standard by
adding  10 mL of QC check sample  con-
centrate  (Section 8.2.1 or 8.3.2) to 1 L of rea-
gent water. The QC check  standard  needs
only to contain the parameters that  failed
criteria in the test in Section 8.3.
  8.4.2  Analyze the QC check  standard  to
determine the concentration measured  (A) of
each parameter. Calculate each percent re-
covery (Ps) as 100 (A/T)%, where T is the true
value of the standard concentration.
  8.4.3  Compare  the percent recovery (Ps)
for each parameter  with the corresponding
QC acceptance criteria found  in Table 6. Only
parameters that failed the test in Section 8.3
need to be compared with these criteria. If
the recovery of any such parameter falls out-
side the designated  range,  the laboratory
performance for that parameter is judged to
be out of control, and the problem must  be
immediately identified and  corrected. The
analytical result for that  parameter in the
unspiked sample is suspect and may not  be
reported for regulatory compliance purposes.
  8.5  As part  of the QC program for the lab-
oratory,  method accuracy for wastewater
samples must be assessed  and records must
be  maintained. After the analysis of five
spiked wastewater samples as in Section 8._3,
calculate  the  average percent recovery (P)
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (sp). Express the accuracy assessment
as a percent interval from P-2sp to P+2sp. If
P=90% and sp=10%, for example, the accuracy
interval is expressed as 70—110%. Update the
accuracy assessment for each parameter on a
regular basis (e.g. after each five to ten new
accuracy measurements).
  8.6  As a quality control check, the labora-
tory must spike all  samples  with the surro-
gate standard spiking solution as described
in Section 10.2, and calculate the percent re-
covery of each surrogate compound.
  8.7  It is recommended that the laboratory
adopt additional quality assurance  practices
for use with this method. The specific prac-
tices that are most  productive depend upon
the needs of the laboratory and the nature of
                                         214

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
the samples. Field duplicates may be ana-
lyzed to assess the precision of the environ-
mental measurements.  Whenever possible,
the laboratory should analyze standard ref-
erence materials and participate in relevant
performance evaluation studies.

    9. Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling
  9.1  Grab  samples  must  be collected in
glass  containers.  Conventional  sampling-
practices8  should be followed, except that
the bottle must not be prerinsed with sample
before collection. Composite samples should
be collected in refrigerated glass  containers
in accordance with the requirements of the
program.  Automatic  sampling   equipment
must be as  free as possible of Tygon tubing
and  other  potential sources  of contamina-
tion.
  9.2  All sampling must be iced or refrig-
erated at 4 °C from the time of collection
until extraction. Pill the sample bottles and,
if residual  chlorine is present, add 80 mg of
sodium thiosulfate per liter of sample  and
mix well. EPA Methods 330.4 and 330.5 may
be used  for measurement of residual chlo-
rine.9 Field test  kits are available for this
purpose.
  9.3  All samples must be extracted within 7
days  of collection and completely analyzed
within 40 days of extraction.

       10. Separatory Funnel Extraction

  10.1  Samples are usually extracted using
separatory funnel techniques. If  emulsions
will prevent achieving acceptable solvent re-
covery with separatory funnel extractions,
continuous  extraction (Section 11) may be
used.  The  separatory   funnel   extraction
scheme described below  assumes a  sample
volume of 1 L. When  sample volumes of 2 L
are to be extracted, use 250, 100, and  100-mL
volumes of methylene chloride for the serial
extraction  of the base/neutrals and 200,  100,
and  100-mL volumes  of methylene chloride
for the acids.
  10.2  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the sample bottle for later determination
of sample volume. Pour the  entire  sample
into a 2-L  separatory  funnel. Pipet 1.00 mL
of the surrogate standard spiking solution
into the separatory  funnel  and  mix well.
Check the pH of the sample with wide-range
pH  paper and adjust  to pH>ll with  sodium
hydroxide solution.
  10.3  Add 60 mL of methylene chloride to
the sample bottle, seal, and shake for 30 s to
rinse  the inner surface  Transfer the solvent
to the  separatory  funnel and extract  the
sample by shaking the funnel for 2 min. with
periodic venting to release excess pressure.
Allow the organic layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 min. If the
emulsion interface between  layers is more
than  one-third the volume  of the  solvent
layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation.
The optimum technique  depends upon the
sample, but may include  stirring, filtration
of  the  emulsion through glass  wool,  cen-
trifugation,  or other physical methods. Col-
lect the methylene chloride extract in a 250-
mL Erlenmeyer flask. If the emulsion cannot
be broken (recovery of  less than 80% of the
methylene chloride, corrected for the water
solubility of methylene  chloride), transfer
the sample, solvent, and  emulsion into the
extraction chamber of a  continuous  extrac-
tor and proceed  as  described in Section 11.3.
  10.4  Add a second 60-mL volume of meth-
ylene chloride to the sample bottle and re-
peat the extraction procedure a second time,
combining the extracts in the Erlenmeyer
flask. Perform a, third extraction in the same
manner. Label the  combined extract as the
base/neutral fraction.
  10.5  Adjust the pH of the aqueous phase to
less than  2 using sulfuric acid.  Serially ex-
tract the acidified aqueous phase three times
with 60-mL  aliquots of methylene chloride.
Collect and combine the extracts in a 250-mL
Erlenmeyer flask and label the combined ex-
tracts as the acid fraction.
  10.6  For   each  fraction,   assemble   a
Kuderna-Danish  (K-D)  concentrator  by at-
taching a 10-mL concentrator tube to a 500-
mL evaporative flask.  Other concentration
devices or techniques may be used in place of
the K-D concentrator if the requirements of
Section 8.2 are met.
  10.7  For each  fraction,  pour the combined
extract  through  a solvent-rinsed drying col-
umn containing about 10 cm of anhydrous so-
dium sulfate, and collect  the extract in the
K-D concentrator. Rinse  the  Erlenmeyer
flask and column with 20 to 30 mL of meth-
ylene chloride to complete  the quantitative
transfer.
  10.8 Add one  or two clean boiling chips
and attach a three-ball Snyder column to the
evaporative  flask for each  fraction. Prewet
each Snyder column by adding about 1 mL of
methylene chloride to the top.  Place the K-
D apparatus on a hot water bath (60 to 65 °C)
so  that the concentrator tube  is partially
immersed in the hot water, and the entire
lower rounded surface of the flask is bathed
with hot vapor.  Adjust  the  vertical position
of the apparatus and the  water temperature
as required to complete the concentration in
15 to 20 min. At the proper rate of distilla-
tion the balls of the column will actively
chatter but the chambers  will not flood with
condensed solvent.  When  the apparent vol-
ume of liquid reaches 1  mL, remove the K-D
apparatus from the water bath and allow it
to drain and cool for at least 10 min. Remove
the Snyder column and rinse the flask and
its  lower  joint  into the  concentrator  tube
with 1 to  2 mL  of methylene chloride.  A 5-
mL syringe  is recommended for this oper-
ation.
                                         215
      203-160  D-8

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  10.9  Add another one or two clean boiling
chips to the concentrator tube for each frac-
tion and attach a two-ball micro-Snyder col-
umn. Prewet the Snyder column by adding
about 0.5  mL of methylene chloride to the
top. Place the K-D apparatus on a hot  water
bath (60 to  65 °C) so that the concentrator
tube is partially immersed in hot water. Ad-
just the vertical position of the apparatus
and the water temperature as required  to
complete the concentration in 5 to 10 min.
At the proper rate of distillation the balls of
the  column  will actively chatter  but the
chambers  will not flood with condensed sol-
vent. When the apparent volume  of  liquid
reaches about 0.5 mL, remove the K-D  appa-
ratus from  the water bath  and allow it  to
drain and cool for at least 10 min. Remove
the Snyder  column and rinse  the flask and
its  lower  joint into  the  concentrator tube
with  approximately 0.2  mL of acetone  or
methylene chloride. Adjust the final volume
to 1.0 mL  with the solvent. Stopper the con-
centrator  tube and store  refrigerated if fur-
ther processing will not be performed imme-
diately. If the extracts will be  stored longer
than two days, they should be transferred to
Teflon-sealed  screw-cap  vials and labeled
base/neutral or acid fraction as appropriate.
  10.10  Determine the original sample vol-
ume by refilling the  sample  bottle to the
mark and transferring the liquid to a 1000-
mL graduated cylinder.  Record the sample
volume to the nearest 5 mL.

          11. Continuous Extraction

  11.1  When experience with a sample from
a given source indicates that a  serious  emul-
sion problem will result or an emulsion is en-
countered using a separatory funnel in Sec-
tion 10.3,  a continuous extractor should  be
used.
  11.2  Mark the water meniscus on the side
of the sample bottle for later  determination
of sample volume. Check  the pH of  the sam-
ple with wide-range pH paper and adjust to
pH  >11 with sodium  hydroxide  solution.
Transfer the sample to  the continuous  ex-
tractor and using a pipet, add 1.00 mL of sur-
rogate standard  spiking  solution  and mix
well. Add 60 mL of methylene chloride  to the
sample  bottle, seal, and shake for 30 s  to
rinse the inner surface. Transfer the solvent
to the extractor.
  11.3  Repeat the sample bottle rinse with
an  additional 50 to 100-mL portion  of  meth-
ylene chloride and add the  rinse to the ex-
tractor.
  11.4  Add 200 to 500 mL of methylene chlo-
ride to the distilling flask, add sufficient re-
agent water to ensure proper operation, and
extract for 24 h. Allow to cool, then detach
the  distilling flask.  Dry, concentrate, and
seal the extract as in Sections 10.6 through
10.9.
  11.5  Charge a clean distilling flask with
500 mL of methylene chloride and  attach it
to the continuous extractor. Carefully, while
stirring, adjust the pH of the aqueous phase
to less than 2 using sulfuric acid. Extract for
24 h. Dry, concentrate, and seal the extract
as in Sections 10.6 through 10.9.

     12. Daily GC/MS Performance Tests
  12.1 At the beginning of each  day  that
analyses are to be performed, the GC/MS sys-
tem must be checked to  see if acceptable
performance   criteria  are  achieved   for
DFTPP.10 Each day that benzidine is to be
determined, the tailing factor  criterion de-
scribed in Section 12.4  must  be  achieved.
Each  day that the acids  are  to  be deter-
mined, the tailing factor criterion in Section
12.5 must be achieved.
  12.2 These performance  tests require the
following instrumental parameters:
Electron Energy: 70 V (nominal)
Mass Range: 35 to 450 amu
Scan Time: To give at least 5 scans per peak
  but not to exceed 7 s per scan.
  12.3 DPTPP performance testn-At the be-
ginning of each day, inject 2 nL (50 ng) of
DFTPP standard solution. Obtain a back-
ground-corrected  mass spectra of  DPTPP
and confirm that all the key m/z criteria in
Table 9 are achieved. If all the criteria are
not achieved, the  analyst  must retune  the
mass spectrometer  and repeat the  test until
all criteria are  achieved.  The performance
criteria must be achieved before  any sam-
ples, blanks,  or standards are analyzed. The
taililg factor tests  in Sections 12.4 and 12.5
may be performed  simultaneously  with the
DFTPP test.
  12.4  Column performance  test  for base/
neutrals—At  the beginning of each day that
the base/neutral fraction is to be  analyzed
for benzidine, the  benzidine tailing factor
must be calculated. Inject 100 ng of benzidine
either separately or as a part of a standard
mixture that may  contain DFTPP and cal-
culate the tailing factor. The benzidine tail-
ing factor must be less than 3.0. Calculation
of the tailing factor is illustrated in Figure
13.11 Replace  the column packing if the tail-
ing factor criterion cannot  be achieved.
  12.5  Column performance test for acids—
At the beginning of each day that the acids
are  to  be   determined,  inject  50  ng  of
pentachlorophenol either separately or as a
part of a standard mix that  may contain
DFTPP.    The    tailing    factor    for
pentachlorophenol must be less than 5. Cal-
culation of the tailing factor is  illustrated in
Figure 13.11 Replace the column packing  if
the  tailing   factor  criterion  cannot  be
achieved.

   13. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry

  13.1  Table 4 summarizes the recommended
gas  chromatographic  operating  conditions
for the base/neutral fraction. Table 5 summa-
rizes the recommended gas chromatographic
                                         216

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
operating conditions for the acid fraction.
Included in these tables are retention times
and MDL that can be achieved under these
conditions.  Examples  of  the  separations
achieved by these columns are shown in Fig-
ures 1 through 12. Other packed or capillary
(open-tubular) columns or  chromatographic
conditions may be  used if the requirements
of Section 8.2 are met.
  13.2  After conducting the GC/MS perform-
ance tests in Section 12, calibrate the system
daily as described in Section 7.
  13.3  The internal standard must be added
to sample extract and mixed thoroughly im-
mediately before it is injected into  the  in-
strument. This procedure minimizes losses
due  to  adsorption,  chemical  reaction  or
evaporation.
  13.4  Inject 2 to 5 |iL of the sample  extract
or standard into the GC/MS system using the
solvent-flush  technique.12 Smaller  (1.0  |iL)
volumes may be injected if  automatic de-
vices are employed. Record the volume  in-
jected to the nearest 0.05 \iL.
  13.5  If  the  response  for  any m/z exceeds
the working range  of the GC/MS system, di-
lute the extract and reanalyze.
  13.6  Perform all qualitative  and  quan-
titative measurements as described in Sec-
tions 14  and 15. When the  extracts are not
being  used  for analyses,  store them refrig-
erated at 4°C, protected from light in screw-
cap  vials equipped with unpierced  Teflon-
lined septa.

         14.  Qualitative Identification

  14.1  Obtain EICPs for the primary m/z and
the two other masses listed in Tables 4 and
5.  See Section 7.3 for masses to be used with
internal  and  surrogate standards. The  fol-
lowing criteria must be met to make a quali-
tative identification:
  14.1.1 The characteristic masses  of each
parameter of interest must maximize in the
same or within one  scan of each other.
  14.1.2 The retention time must fall within
±30 s of the retention time of the authentic
compound.
  14.1.3 The relative  peak  heights  of the
three  characteristic  masses  in  the EICPs
must fall within ±20% of the  relative inten-
sities of these masses  in a reference mass
spectrum. The reference mass spectrum can
be obtained from a standard analyzed in the
GC/MS system or from a reference library.
  14.2  Structural  isomers  that have  very
similar mass spectra and less than 30 s dif-
ference in retention time, can be explicitly
identified only if the resolution between au-
thentic isomers in a standard mix is  accept-
able. Acceptable resolution is achieved if the
baseline  to  valley  height between the  iso-
mers is less than 25% of the sum of the two
peak  heights.  Otherwise,  structural  isomers
are identified as isomeric pairs.
              15. Calculations
  15.1  When a parameter has been identi-
fied, the quantitation of that parameter will
be based on the integrated abundance from
the EICP of the primary characteristic m/z
in Tables 4 and 5. Use the base peak m/z for
internal and surrogate standards. If the sam-
ple produces an interference for the  primary
m/z, use a secondary  characteristic m/z to
quantitate.
  Calculate  the concentration in the sample
using the response factor (RF) determined in
Section 7.2.2 and Equation 3.
                           (A.XI.
       Concentration (ng/L) = -
                                Equation 3

where:
As=Area of the characteristic m/z for the pa-
  rameter or surrogate standard to be meas-
  ured.
A,s=Area of the characteristic m/z for the in-
  ternal standard.
Is=Amount  of  internal  standard added  to
  each extract (ng).
V0=Volume of water extracted (L).
  15.2  Report results in ug/L without correc-
tion for recovery data. All QC data obtained
should be reported with the sample results.

          16. Method Performance
  16.1  The method detection limit (MDL)  is
defined as the  minimum concentration of a
substance that  can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.' The MDL concentrations listed in Ta-
bles 4  and  5 were obtained using  reagent
water.13 The MDL actually achieved  in  a
given analysis will vary depending on instru-
ment sensitivity and matrix effects.
  16.2  This method was tested by 15 labora-
tories using  reagent  water,  drinking water,
surface water, and industrial wastewaters
spiked at six concentrations over the range 5
to  1300  ug/L.14 Single operator  precision,
overall  precision, and method accuracy were
found to be directly related to the concentra-
tion of the  parameter and essentially inde-
pendent of the sample matrix. Linear equa-
tions to describe these relationships are pre-
sented in Table 7.

      17. Screening Procedure for 2,3,7,8-
  Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD)

  17,1  If the sample must be screened for
the  presence  of  2,3,7,8-TCDD,  it  is rec-
ommended  that the reference material not
be handled in the laboratory unless extensive
safety precautions are employed. It is suffi-
cient to analyze the base/neutral extract by
selected ion  monitoring  (SIM) GC/MS tech-
niques,  as follows:
  17.1.1  Concentrate  the  base/neutral  ex-
tract to a final  volume of 0.2 ml.
                                          217

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  17.1.2  Adjust the temperature of the base/
neutral column (Section 5.6.2) to 220 °C.
  17.1.3  Operate the  mass spectrometer  to
acquire data in the SIM mode using the ions
at m/z 257, 320 and 322 and a dwell time no
greater than 333 milliseconds per mass.
  17.1.4  Inject 5 to 7  |iL of the base/neutral
extract. Collect SIM  data for a  total of 10
min.
  17.1.5  The  possible presence  of   2,3,7,8-
TCDD is indicated if all three masses exhibit
simultaneous  peaks at any point in the se-
lected ion current profiles.
  17.1.6  For each occurrence where the pos-
sible  presence  of 2,3,7,8-TCDD  is indicated,
calculate and retain the relative abundances
of each of the three masses.
  17.2  False positives to this  test may be
caused by the  presence of single or coelutingr
combinations   of  compounds  whose  mass
spectra contain all of these masses.
  17.3  Conclusive results of the presence and
concentration level of 2,3,7,8-TCDD can be
obtained only from a  properly equipped lab-
oratory through the use of EPA  Method 613
or other approved alternate test  procedures.

               REFERENCES

  1. 40 CFR part 136, appendix B.
  2. "Sampling and Analysis Procedures for
Screening of Industrial Effluents for Priority
Pollutants," U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port  Laboratory,   Cincinnati,   Ohio  45268,
March 1977,  Revised  April 1977. Available
from  Effluent Guidelines Division,  Wash-
ington, DC 20460.
  3. ASTM Annual Book of Standards,  Part
31, D3694-78. "Standard Practices for Prepara-
tion of Sample Containers and  for Preserva-
tion of Organic Constituents," American So-
ciety for  Testing and  Materials, Philadel-
phia.
  4.  "Carcinogens—Working  With Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare,  Public Health Service,  Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  5.  "OSHA Safety and Health  Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR part 1910), Occu-
pational Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206 (Revised, January 1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories,"American Chemical Society Publica-
tion,  Committee  on  Chemical  Safety, 3rd
Edition, 1979.
  7. Provost, L.P.,  and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation of  Percent  Recovery Data," American
Laboratory,  15, 58-63  (1983).  (The value  2.44
used in the equation  in Section  8.3.3 is two
times the value 1.22 derived in this report.)
  8. ASTM Annual Book of Standards,  Part
31,  D3370-76. "Standard Practices for Sam-
pling Water,"  American Society  for  Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia.
  9. "Methods  330.4 (Titrimetric,  DPD-FAS)
and  330.5  (Spectrophotometric,  DPD)  for
Chlorine,   Total   Residual,"  Methods  for
Chemical  Analysis of  Water  and Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020,  U.S. Environmental  Pro-
tection  Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and  Support Laboratory,  Cincinnati, Ohio
45268, March 1979.
  10. Eichelberger, J.W.,  Harris, L.E., and
Budde, W.L. "Reference Compound to Cali-
brate Ion Abundance Measurement in Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectometry," Analyt-
ical Chemistry, 47, 995 (1975).
  11. McNair, N.M. and Bonelli, E.J.  "Basic
Chromatography,"  Consolidated  Printing,
Berkeley, California, p. 52,1969.
  12. Burke, J.A. "Gas Chromatography for
Pesticide Residue Analysis; Some Practical
Aspects," Journal  of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists, 48, 1037 (1965).
  13.   Olynyk,   P.,   Budde,   W.L.,  and
Eichelberger, J.W. "Method Detection Limit
for Methods 624 and 625," Unpublished  report,
May 14,1980.
  14. "EPA  Method Study 30, Method 625,
Base/Neutrals, Acids,  and Pesticides,"  EPA
600/4-84-053, National Technical Information
Service,  PB84-206572,  Springfield,  Virginia
22161, June 1984.

   TABLE 1—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES
Parameter

Acenaphthylene 	

Aldnn .... ... .

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 	
Benzojkjfluoranthene 	

Benzyl butyl phtfialate 	
p-BHC ... 	
5-BHC
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane .. . .
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phlhalate 	
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether' 	
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether* 	
2-CMoronaphthatele 	
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 	
44'-DDD .... ... .
4,4'-DDE 	
44'-DDT 	
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 	
Di-n-butylphthalate
1 3-Dichlorobenzene 	
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene 	


Dtethyl phtrialate 	
Dimethyl phthalate
2 4-Dinrtrotoluene . .
2 6-Dinrtrotoluene 	
Di-n-octylphthalate
Endosulfan sulfate 	
STORET
No
34205
34200
34220
39330
34526
34230
34242
34247
34521
34292
39338
34259
34273
34278
39100
34283
34636
39350
34581
34641
34320
39310
39320
39300
34556
39110
34566
34536
34571
34631
39380
34336
34341
34611
34626
34596
34351
CAS No.
83-32-9
208-96-8
120-12-7
309-00-2
56-55-3
205-99-2
207-08-9
50-32-8
191-24-2
85-68-7
319-85-7
319-86-8
111-44-4
111-91-1
117-81-7
108-60-1
101-55-3
57-74-9
91-58-7
7005-72-3
218-01-9
72-54-8
72-55-9
50-29-3
53-70-3
84-74-2
541-73-1
95-50-1
106-46-7
91-94-1
60-57-1
84-66-2
131-11-3
121-14-2
606-20-2
117-84-0
1031-07-6
                                         218

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
      Pt. 136, App. A, Merh. 625
  TABLE 1—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES—
               Continued
TABLE 2—ACID EXTRACTABLES
Parameter
Endrin aldehyde
Fluoranthene 	
Fluorene
Heptachlor .
Heptchlor epoxide .
Hexachlorobenzene 	
Hexachlorobutadiene 	
Hexachloroethane .. 	
IndenoO ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone 	
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene 	
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamme 	
PCB-1016 . .
PCB-1221 	
PCB-1232 	
PCB-1242 	
PCB-1248 	
PCB-1254 .... 	
PCB-1260 	 . ..
Phenanthrene 	
Pyrene 	 	
Toxaphene ..
1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene 	
STORET
No
34366
34376
34381
39410
39420
39700
34391
34396
34403
34408
34696
34447
34428
34671
39488
39492
39496
39500
39504
39508
34461
34469
39400
34551
CAS No
7421-93-4
206-44-0
86-73-7
76-44-8
1024-57-3
118-74-1
87-68-3
67-72-1
193-39-5
78-59-1
91-20-3
98-95-3
621-64-7
12674-11-2
11104-28-2
11141-16-5
53469-21-9
12672-29-6
11097-69-1
11096-82-5
85-01-8
129-00-0
8001-35-2
120-82-1
Parameter
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol . .
2-Chlorophenol . 	
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dmitrophenol .. 	
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol 	
4-Nitrophenol .
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol 	 .. .
2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol
STORET
No
34452
34586
34601
34606
34616
34657
34591
34646
39032
34694
34621
CAS No
59-50-7
95-57-8
120-83-2
105-67-9
51-28-5
534-52-1
88-75-5
100-02-7
87-86-5
108-95-2
88-06-2
                                               TABLE 3—ADDITIONAL EXTRACTABLE
                                                        PARAMETERS"
Parameter
Benzidine 	
P-BHC 	
8-BHC 	
Endosurfan 1 	
Endosulfan II 	
Endrm ....
Hexachlorocylopentadiene
N-Nitrosodimethylamme
N-Nitrosodiphenylamme ....
STORET
No
39120
39337
39340
34361
34356
39390
34386
34438
34433
CAS No
92-87-5
319-84-6
58-89-8
959-98-8
33213-65-9
72-20-6
77-47-4
62-75-9
86-30-6
Meth-
od
605
608
608
608
608
608
612
607
607
 •The proper chemical name is 2,2'-oxybis(1-chloropropane).
                                           • See Section 1 2
   TABLE 4—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS, METHOD DETECTION LIMITS, AND CHARACTERISTIC
                       MASSES FOR BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES
Parameter
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene .
Hexachloroethane
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether"
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene 	
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether" 	
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 	
Nitrobenzene ... ....
Hexachlorobutadiene 	
1,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene . . .
Isophorone . . . .
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane . .
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene" .
2-Chloronaphthalene 	
Acenaphthylene .... 	
Acenaphthene 	 	
Dimethyl phthalate 	
2,6-Dmitrotoluene 	
Fluorene 	 ...
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ..
2,4-Dinitroto!uene 	 	
Diethyl phthalate 	
N-Nitrosodiphenylammeb 	
Hexachlorobenzene 	
$-BHC» 	
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether . .
8-BHCb


P-BHC 	
Reten-
tion time
(mm)
74
7.8
84
84
84
93
11 1
11 4
11 6
119
121
122
139
159
174
17.8
183
187
195
195
198
201
205
21 0
21 1
21 2
224
228
22.8
234
Method
detec-
tion limit
(M9/U
1 9
44
1 6
57
1 9
5.7
1 9
09
1.9
2.2
1 6
53
1 9
35
1 9
1.6
1.9
1 9
42
57
1 9
1.9
1 9
1 9
54
1 9
42
Characteristic masses
Electron impact
Primary
146
146
117
93
146
45
130
77
225
180
82
128
93
237
162
152
154
163
165
166
204
165
149
169
284
183
248
183
178
178
181
ondary
148
148
201
63
148
77
42
123
223
182
95
129
95
235
164
151
153
194
89
165
206
63
177
168
142
181
250
181
179
179
183
Sec-
ondary
113
113
199
95
113
79
101
65
227
145
138
127
123
272
127
153
152
164
121
167
141
182
150
167
249
109
141
109
176
176
109
Chemical ionization
Methane
146
146
199
63
146
77
124
223
181
139
129
65
235
163
152
154
151
183
166
183
177
169
284
249
178
178
Methane
148
148
201
107
148
135
'" 152
225
183
167
157
107
237
191
153
155
163
211
167
211
223
170
286
251
179
179
Methane
150
150
203
109
150
137
164
227
209
178
169
137
239
203
181
183
164
223
195
223
251
198
288
277
207
207
                                       219

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
   TABLE 4—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS, METHOD DETECTION LIMITS, AND CHARACTERISTIC
                    MASSES FOR BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES—Continued
Parameter
Heptachlor 	
8-BHC 	 	
Aldrin 	 	
Dibutyl phthalate



Dieldrin
4 4'-DDE

Endrin » 	 	
Endosulfan II b
4 4'-DDD
Benzidineb 	
4,4'-DDT 	
Endosulfan sulfate 	
Endrin aldehyde 	 	
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 	
Chrysene ..

3 3'-Dichlorobenzidine




lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd) pyrene 	 ..





PCB 1016' 	
PCB 1221 «
PCB 1232« .... 	
PCB 1242« 	 	
PCB 1248« 	 	
PCB 1254=
PCB 1260« 	
Reten-
tion time
(mm)
23.4
237
240
24.7
256
26.4
26.5
27.2
27.2
27.3
27.9
28.6
286
28.8
29.3
29.8
29.9
30.6
31.5
31.5
32.2
32.5
34.9
34.9
364
427
43.2
451
19-30
25-34
18-30
15-30
15-32
15-32
12-34
22-34
23-32
Method
detec-
tion limit

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
   TABLE 5—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS, METHOD DETECTION LIMITS, AND CHARACTERISTIC
                       MASSES FOR ACID EXTRACTABLES—Continued
Parameter
4-Nitrophenol 	
Reten-
tion time
(min)
203
Method
detec-
tion limit
(M9/L)
24
Characteristic masses
Electron Impact
Primary
65
Sec-
ondary
139
Sec-
ondary
109
Chemical iomzation
Methane
140
Methane
168
Methane
122
  Column conditions Supelcoport (100/120 mesh) coated with 1% SP-1240DA packed in a 1.8 m long x 2mm ID glass column
with helium carrier gas at 30 mL/mm. flow rate Column temperature held isothermal at 70 °C for 2 mm then programmed at 8
°C/mm. to 200 °C.


                    TABLE 6—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 625
Parameter


Aldrin 	 	 	

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 	 	 	
Benzo(k)Nuorantnene 	 	
Benzo(a)pyrene 	 	 	
Benzyl butyl phthalate 	 	
p-BHC
8-BHC . 	
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 	 	

Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether3 	 	
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 	 	
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 	 	


4,4'-DDD 	 	 	
4 4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT 	 	
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 	 	
Di-n-butyl phthalate . 	 	
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene ... 	
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene 	
1 ,4,-Dichlorobenzene 	 	
3,3'-Dhlorobenzidme 	
Dieldnn 	 	
Diethyl phthalate 	
Dimethyl phthalate 	 	
2,4-Dmitrotoluene . . 	
2,6-Dmitrotoluene . . 	
Di-n-octyl phthalate . 	 	
Endosulfan sulfate . . . 	 	
Endrm aldehyde 	 	
Fluoranthene 	 	
Fluorene ... 	 .... 	
Heptachlor 	 . . 	
Heptachlor epoxide 	 ....
Hexachlorobenzene ... ... 	
Hexachloroethane 	 	 	
lndeno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene 	 .... ...
Isophorone . 	 ... ....
Nitrobenzene 	 	
PCB-1260 	 	
Pyrene 	 .... 	
1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene 	 	
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol 	
Test conclu-
sion (ng/L)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Limits for s
(M9/U
276
402
39.0
320
276
388
323
390
589
23.4
31 5
21 6
550
345
46.3
41 1
230
130
334
483
31 0
320
61 6
700
167
309
41 7
32.1
71.4
30.7
26.5
232
21.8
296
31 4
167
325
328
20.7
37.2
54.7
249
263
24.5
44.6
63.3
30 1
39.3
554
54.2
206
25.2
28.1
372
28.7
Flange for
X(MI/L)
601 1323
53 5-126 0
7.2-1522
434-1180
41 8-1330
420-1404
25,2-145.7
31.7-148.0
D-1950
D-1399
41 5-1306
D-1000
42,9-1260
49 2 164 7
62.8-1386
28.9-1368
649-1144
64 5-113 5
384-1447
44 1-1399
D-1345
192 1197
D-1706
D-1997
84-111.0
48.6-112.0
16.7-153 9
37.3-1057
8.2-212.5
44.3-1193
D-1000
D-1000
475-1269
681-1367
18.6-131 8
D-1035
D-1888
429-121.3
71 6-108.4
D-172.2
709-1094
78-141 5
378-1022
552-1000
D-1509
466-1802
356-1196
54.3-1576
136-1979
193-121.0
652 1087
69 6-100.0
57.3-1292
408-1279
36.2-1204
Range for
P, P. (Per-
cent)
47 145
33-145
D-166
27-133
33-143
24-159
11-162
17-163
D-219
D-152
24-149
D-110
12-158
33-184
36-166
8-158
53-127
60-118
25-158
17-168
D-145
4-136
D-203
D-227
1-118
32-129
D-172
20-124
D-262
29-136
D-114
D-112
39-139
50-158
4-146
D-107
D-209
26-137
59-121
D-192
26-155
D-152
24-116
40-113
D-171
21-196
21 133
35-180
D-230
D-164
54-120
52-115
44-142
22 147
23-134
                                         221

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                 TABLE 6—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—METHOD 625—Continued
Parameter
2 4-Dichlorophenol 	 	

2 4-Dinitrophenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 	 	
2-Nitrophenol

Pentachlorophenol 	 	
Phenol
2.4.6-TrichloroDhenol 	
Test conclu-
sion (jig/L)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Limits for s
(ng/L)
264
26 1
498
932
352
472
489
226
31.7
Range for
X(ng/L)
525-121 7
41 8-1090
D-1729
530-1000
450-1667
130-1065
38.1-151 8
166-1000
52.4-129.2
Range for
P, P, (Per-
cent)
39-135
32-1 1 9
D-191
D-181
29-182
D-132
14-176
5-112
37-144
  S=Standard deviation for four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 8.2.4).
  X=Auerage recovery for four recovery measurements, in ug/L (Section 8.2 4).
  P, Ps=Percent recovery measured (Section 8.3.2, Section 8.4.2)
  D=Detected; result must be greater than zero.
  NOTE: These criteria are based directly upon the method performance data in Table 7. Where necessary, the limits for recov-
ery have been broadened to assure applicability of the limts to concentrations below those used to develop Table 7.
  "The proper chemical name is 2,2'oxybis(1-chloropropane).


  TABLE 7—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 625
Parameter

Acenaphthylene 	
Aldrin





Benzo(ghi)perylene 	
Benzyl butyl phthalate
(3-BHC 	 	 	
5-BHC
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether


Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 	

2-Chloronaphthalene 	 	


4 4'-DDD
44'-DDE 	 . 	 	
44'-DDT 	 	 	


1 2-Dichlorobenzene .... 	 	



Dieldrm , . 	 	
Diethyt phthalate 	 	 	
Dimethyl phthalate 	 	
2 4-Dmitrotoluene 	 	 	 	






Heptachlor .... 	 	
Heptachlor epoxide 	 	
Hexachlorobenzene 	 	 	 	




Naphthalene 	
Accuracy, as
recovery, X'
(H9/L)
096C-0 19
0 89C-0 74
0 78C-1 66
0.80C=0.68
088C-060
093C-1 80
0 87C - 1 56
0.90C-013
0.98C-0.86
066C-1 68
0.87C-0.94
0 29C - 1 09
086C-1 54
1 12C-504
1 03C-231
0.84C-1.18
091C-1 34
0.89C-0.01
0 91C-0 53
0.93C-1.00
056C-040
070C-0.54
0.79C-3.28
0 88C=4 72
0 59C-0 71
0.80C-0 28
086C-070
0 73C - 1 47
1.23C-1265
082C-016
0.43C-1 00
0 20C=1 .03
092C-481
1 06C - 3 60
076C-079
0 39C-0.41
0 76C 3 86
081C-1 10
090C-000
087C-297
0.92C-1.87
0.74C=0 66
071C-1 01
073C-083
0.78C-310
1 12C=1 41
0.76C=1 58
Single analyst
precision, sr'
(ug/L)
0 15X-0 12
0.24X-1 06
027X-1 28
021X-0.32
015X=093
0 22X=0 43
0 19X-1 03
022X=048
0 29X=2.40
0 18X=094
020X-0.58
034X=086
035X-099
0 16X-1 34
0 24X=0 28
0 26X=0.73
013X=066
0 07X-0 52
020X-094
028X=013
029X-032
026X-1.17
042X-0.19
0 30X=8 51
0 13X=1 16
0 20X-0.47
0 25X-0 68
0 24X=0 23
0 28X-7.33
020X-016
0.28X-1 44
0.54X=0 19
0.12X-1 06
014X-1 26
021X=1 19
0 12X-2.47
0 18X-3 91
0 22X - 0 73
012X-026
024X-0.56
033X-046
0.18X-0.10
019X-092
017X-0.67
029X-1.46
0 27X-0 77
021X-041
Overall preci-
sion, S' (ug/L)
021X-067
026X-054
043X=1 13
027X-0.64
0 26X 0 28
0 29X-0 96
0 35X-0 40
0 32X=1 .35
0 51 X- 0.44
0 53X-0 92
030X-1.94
093X-017
0 35X=0 10
0 26X=2 01
0 25X-1 .04
0.36X=0.67
0 16X=066
0.13X=0.34
0 SOX -0.46
0.33X-009
066X-0.96
0.39X-1 04
0.65X-058
0 59X=0 25
0 39X-0.60
0.24X-0.39
041X=0 11
0 29X-0.36
0 47X=3.45
0.26X-0.07
0.52X-0.22
1 05X-0.92
0.21 X=1 50
0 19X-035
037X-1.19
0.63X-1.03
073X-062
028X-0.60
0 13X-0.61
050X-0.23
0 28X=0 64
043X-0.52
0 26X-0 49
0 17X=080
0.50X=0 44
0 33X=0 26
0.30X-0.68
                                               222

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                            Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 625
 TABLE 7—METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION—METHOD 625—
                                              Continued
Parameter
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamme
PCB-1260 ....
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol . ....
2,4-Dichlorophenol . .
2,4-Dimethylphenol 	
2,4-Dmitrophenol . . . .
2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol , . ...
2-Nitrophenol . . . 	
4-Nitrophenol . ....
Pentachlorophenol . . . ...
Phenol ...
2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol 	
Accuracy, as
recovery, X'
(H9/L)
1 090-305
1 12C-622
081C-1086
087C-006
084C-016
094C-079
0 84C=0 35
0 780=0 29
0870=013
0710=441
0810-1804
1 040-2804
1 07C-1 15
061C-122
0 930=1 99
0 43C=1 26
0910-0.18
Single analyst
precision, s,'
(M9/L)
0 19X=092
0 27X=0 68
0 35X=3 61
0.12X=0.57
016X=006
015X=085
0 23X=0 75
018X=1 46
015X=1 25
0 16X=1 21
0 38X=2.36
0 05X=42 29
016X=1 94
0 38X=2 57
0 24X=3 03
0 26X=0 73
016X=222
Overall preci-
sion, S' (ng/L)
0 27X=0 21
0 44X=0 47
0 43X=1 82
015X=025
015X=031
021X=039
0 29X=1 31
0 28X=0 97
021X=1 28
0 22X=1 31
0 42X=26 29
026X=2310
0.27X=2 60
0 44X=3 24
0 30X=4 33
0 35X=0.58
0 22X=1 81
  X'=Expected recovery for one or more measurements of a sample containing a concentration of C, in jig/L
  s,'=Expected single analyst standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of Xl in ug/L
  S'= Expected Intel-laboratory standard deviation of measurements at an average concentration found of X, in jig/L
  C= True value for the concentration, in ^ig/L
  X= Average recovery found for measurements of samples containing a concentration of C, in ag/L
  aThe proper chemical name is 2,2'oxybis(1 -chloropropane)
      TABLE 8—SUGGESTED INTERNAL AND
            SURROGATE STANDARDS
                                 TABLE 9—DFTPP KEY MASSES AND
                                         ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
    Base/neutral fraction
Anihne-d5
Anthracene-dm
Benzo(a)anthracene-du
4,4'-Dibromobiphenyl	
4,4'-
  Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl
Decafluorobiphenyl
2,21-Difluorobiphenyl
4-Fluoroanilme
1-Fluoronaphthalene
2-Fluoronaphthalene
Naphthalene-dg
Nitrobenzene-ds
2,3,4,5,6-Pentafluorobiphenyl
Phenanthrene-dio 	
Pyndme-d,
                                 Acid fraction
                                                       Mass
2-Fluorophenol
Pentafluorophenol
Phenol-ds
2-Perfluoromethyl phenol
 51
 68
 70
127
197
198
199
275
365
441
442
443
                                                                         m/z Abundance criteria
30-60 percent of mass 198.
Less than 2 percent of mass 69
Less than 2 percent of mass 69.
40-60 percent of mass 198
Less than 1 percent of mass 198
Base peak, 100 percent relative abundance
5-9 percent of mass 198
10-30 percent of mass 198
Greater than 1 percent of mass 198
Present but less than mass 443
Greater than 40 percent of mass 198
17-23 percent of mass 442
                                                 223

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
                          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                                       COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
                                                       PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 MIN. 8°PER MIN TO 2?0°C
                                                       DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
              2.4-DINITROTOLUENE-'  N-NITROSO DIPHENYLAMINE
         10
                   15
                            20
      25        30
RETENTION TIME, MIN.
                                                          35
               Figure 1.  Gas chromatogram of base/neutral fraction .
                                                                    40
                                                                             45
 COLUMN: 1% SP-1240DA ON SUPELCOPORT   j
 PROGRAM: 70% FOR 2 MIN. 8°C/MIN TO 200°C
 DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER.    =!    _,
                                 8      10      12
                                 RETENTION TIME, MIN .
                                                        14
                                16
                                                                       18
                                               20
                                                      22
                         Figure 2.  Gas chromatogram of acid fraction.
                                          224

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
        COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPaCOPORT
        PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 WIN. 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
        DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
                          10           15          20
                              RETENTION TIME, MIN-
         25
                     30
                        Figure 3. Gas chromatogram of pesticide fraction.
                                     225

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
                                     40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
  PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 MIN. 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
  DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
                                        m/z*35 TO 450
                                        m/z=377
                                        m/z=375
                                        m/z=373
     18
          20
                22
                                           32
                                                34
                   24    26    28    30
                  RETENTION TIME, MIN.
Figure  4.  Gas chromatogram of chlordane.
                                                     36
                             226

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                Pf. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
      COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
      PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 MIN, 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
      DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
        22
24
                   26
28
                             30
                                   32
                                        34
                                              36   38
                    RETENTION TIME, MIN.
     Figure 5.   Gas chromatogram of toxaphene.
                            227

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
    PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 MIN, 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
    DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
          18    20    22   24    26    28    30    32
                   RETENTION TIME, MIN.

   Figure 6.  Gas chromatogram of PCB-1016.
                            228

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
                 COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
                 PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 MIN. 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
                 DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
         18    20    22    24    26    28   30    32

                   RETENTION TIME, MIN.

  Figure 7.  Gas chromatogram of PCB-1221.
                           229

-------
Pt. 136,App. A, Meth.625
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
               COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
               PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 MIN, 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
               DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
        18    20
    30   32
                 22    24    26    28
                RETENTION TIME, MIN.

Figure  8.   Gas chromatogram of PCB-1232.
                           230

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

    COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
    PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 WIN, 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
    DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
                         Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
                                           m/z-35 TO 450
         18
20    22    24    26     28    30
      RETENTION TIME, MIN.
                                               32
   Figure  9.   Gas chromatogram of PCB-1242.
                            231

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
     COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
     PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 MIN, 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
     DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
               20     22    24    26   28    30
                    RETENTION TIME, MIN.
         32
  Figure 10.   Gas chromatogram of PCB-1248.
                            232

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
  COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
  PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 WIN. 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
  DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
   m/Z-3ST0450  _  ^  ^
   m/z-362
   m/z-330
   m/z»294
        18    20    22    24    26    28    30    32
                        RETENTION TIME. MIN.
                                                  34
                                                        36
               38
 Figure  11.  Gas chromatogram of PCB-1254.
                                 233

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  COLUMN: 3% SP-2250 ON SUPELCOPORT
  PROGRAM: 50°C FOR 4 WIN, 8°C/MIN TO 270°C
  DETECTOR: MASS SPECTROMETER
         18
              20
                   22
                         24    26    28    30    32

                         RETENTION TIME, MIN.
                                                   34
                                                        36
 Figure 12.   Gas chromatogram of PCB-1260.
                                 234

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
                    TAILING FACTOR= ^
                                    AB
   Example calculation: Peak Height = DE = 100mm
                     10% Peak Height = BD * 10 mm
                     Peak Width at 10% Peak Height = AC = 23 mm
                           AB = 11 mm
                           BC = 12 mm

                     Therefore: Tailing Factors— =1.1
                                           11

   Figure  13.   Tailing  factor calculation.
                             235

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
        ATTACHMENT 1 TO METHOD 625

               INTRODUCTION

  To   support  measurement   of   several
semivolatile pollutants, EPA has developed
this attachment to EPA  Method  625.1 The
modifications listed in this attachment  are
approved only for monitoring wastestreams
from the Centralized Waste Treatment Point
Source  Category (40  CPR  Part 437) and  the
Landfills  Point  Source Category  (40 CFR
Part 445). EPA Method 625 (the  Method) in-
volves  sample  extraction  with methylene
chloride followed by  analysis of the extract
using either packed or  capillary column  gas
chromatography/mass  spectrometry  (GC/
MS). This attachment addresses the addition
of the semivolatile pollutants listed in  Ta-
bles 1  and 2, to  all  applicable  standard,
stock, and spiking solutions utilized for  the
determination of semivolatile organic com-
pounds by EPA Method 625.
   1.0
       EPA METHOD 625 MODIFICATION
                SUMMARY
  The additional semivolatile organic com-
pounds listed in Tables 1 and 2 are added to
all applicable calibration, spiking,  and other
solutions utilized in  the  determination  of
base/neutral  and  acid compounds by EPA
Method 625.  The instrument is to be cali-
brated with  these compounds,  using  a cap-
illary column, and all procedures and quality
control  tests stated in the Method must  be
performed.

      2.0 SECTION MODIFICATIONS

  NOTE:  All  section and figure numbers  in
this Attachment reference section and figure
numbers in  EPA  Method 625  unless  noted
otherwise.  Sections not listed here  remain
unchanged.
Section 6.7  The stock standard solutions de-
    scribed in this section are modified such
    that the analytes in Tables 1 and 2 of this
    attachment  are  required in addition  to
    those specified in the Method.
Section 7.2 The calibration standards  de-
    scribed in this section are modified to in-
    clude the analytes in Tables 1 and 2 of
    this attachment.
Section 8.2  The precision and accuracy re-
    quirements are modified to include  the
    analytes listed in Tables 1 and 2 of this
    attachment. Additional  performance cri-
    teria are supplied in Table 5 of this at-
    tachment.
Section 8.3  The matrix spike is modified to
    include the  analytes  listed in Tables 1
    and 2 of this attachment.
Section 8.4  The QC check standard is modi-
    fied to include the analytes listed in Ta-
    bles 1 and  2 of this  attachment. Addi-
    tional performance criteria are supplied
    in Table 5 of this attachment.
Section  16.0  Additional  method  perform-
    ance information is supplied with  this at-
    tachment

   TABLE 1—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES
Parameter
acetophenone '
alpha-terpmeol ^
aniline2 . . . . .
carbazole ' 	
o-cresol1
n-decane ' 	
2,3-dichloroanilme ' 	
n-octadecane ' . ...
pyridme 2 	
CAS No
98-86-2
98-55-5
62-53-3
86-74-8
95-48-7
124-18-5
608-27-5
593-45-3
110-86-1
  CAS = Chemical Abstracts Registry
  ' Analysis ol this pollutant is approved only for the Central-
ized Waste Treatment industry
  2 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Central-
ized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries
  ^Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Landfills
industry

        TABLE 2—ACID EXTRACTABLES
             Parameter
p-cresol'
                                   CAS No
                                    106-44-5
  CAS = Chemical Abstracts Registry
  1 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Central-
ized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries
      TABLE 3—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS,! METHOD DETECTION LIMITS (MDLs), AND
                   CHARACTERISTIC M/Z'S FOR BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES
Analyte
pyridine 3 ... ....
N-Nitro sodimethylamine 	 ...
aniline3 ... .....
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether . ... ...
n-decane4 	 	 	
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene 	
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene . .. 	
1 .2-Dichlorobenzene . 	
Retention
time
(mm) 2
4.93
495
10.82
10.94
11 11
11 47
11.62
1217
MDL
(W/L)
46
33
50
Characteristic m/z's
Electron impact
Primary
79
42
93
93
57
146
146
146
Secondary
52
74
66
63
148
148
148
Secondary
51
44
65
95
113
113
113
        Method 625: Base/Neutrals and Acids,
40 CFR Part 136, Appendix A.
                                          236

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 625
       TABLE 3—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS(I METHOD DETECTION LIMITS (MDLs), AND
              CHARACTERISTIC M/Z'S FOR BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES—Continued
Analyte

Bis(2-chloro- isopropyljether . 	

Hexachloroethane 	
Nitrobenzene . .. . 	
Bis (2-chloro ethoxy)methane 	






Dimethyl phthalate




Diethylphthalate 	








Carbazote4
Dibutyl phthalate .... 	 . ...



Butyl benzyl phthalate
3 3'-Dichlorobenzidine 	

Bis(2-ethyl hexyl)phthalate



Benzo(k)fluoranthene 	

Dibenzo(a,h) anthracene 	

BenzofahiJoervlene 	
Retention
time
(mm)2
12.48
1251
1288
1297
1308
13.40
14.11
1482
15.37
15.55
15.56
1612
1847
1882
19.35
2048
2069
20.73
21.30
22.00
22.74
22.90
22,92
23.35
24.44
24.93
25.39
25.98
26,12
26.66
27.84
29.82
30.26
3056
32.63
34.28
34.33
34.36
34.44
36.17
3790
3797
3917
44.91
45.01
4656
MDL
(H9/L)
4.7
3.4
	 5.0
25




2.0
4.0





Characteristic m/z's
Electron impact
Primary
108
45
105
130
117
77
82
93
180
59
128
225
237
161
162
163
152
165
154
165
149
204
166
169
248
284
57
178
178
167
149
202
184
202
149
252
228
149
228
149
252
252
252
278
276
276
Secondary
107
77
77
42
201
123
95
95
182
129
223
235
163
164
194
151
89
153
63
177
206
165
168
250
142
179
179
150
101
92
101
91
254
229
167
226
253
253
253
139
138
138
Secondary
79
79
51
101
199
65
138
123
145
127
227
272
90
127
164
153
121
152
182
150
141
167
167
141
249
176
176
104
100
185
100
206
126
226
279
229
125
125
125
279
277
277
  1 The data presented in this table were obtained under the following conditions
  Column—30 ±5 meters x 025 ±02 mm i d,  94% methyl, 5% phenyl, 1% vinyl, bonded phase fused silica capillary column
(DB-5)
  Temperature program—Five minutes at 30 °C; 30-280 °C at 8 °C per minute, isothermal at 280 °C until benzo(ghi)perylene
elutes.
  Gas velocity—30±5 cm/sec at 30 "C.
  2 Retention times are from Method 1625,  Revision C, using a capillary column, and are  intended to be consistent for all
analyles in Tables 4 and 5 of this attachment.
  3 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries.
  'Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment industry.


       TABLE 4—CHROMATOGRAPHIC  CONDITIONS^ METHOD DETECTION LIMITS (MDLs), AND

                         CHARACTERISTIC M/Z'S FOR ACID EXTRACTABLES
Analyte

2-Chlorophenol 	
Retention
time2
(min)
1076
11.08
MDL
(H9/L)


Charactenstic m/z's
Electron impact
Pnmary
94
128
Secondary
65
64
Secondary
66
130
                                              237

-------
Pt.  136, App. A.Meth. 1613
            40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
       TABLE 4—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS,1 METHOD DETECTION LIMITS (MDLs), AND
                  CHARACTERISTIC M/Z'S FOR ACID EXTRACTABLES—Continued

Analyte

p-cresol3 	
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dtchlorophenol
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol . . ...
2,4,6-Tnchlorophenol
2,4-Dmitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol . .

Pentachlorophenol ....

time2

1292
1438
1454
1512
1683
1880
21 51
21 77
2283
2552

MDL
(M9/L)

78









Characteristic m/z's
Electron impact
Primary
108
139
122
162
142
196
184
65
198
266
Secondary
107
65
107
164
107
198
63
139
182
264
Secondary
77
109
121
98
144
200
154
109
77
268
  1 The data presented in this table were obtained under the following conditions
  Column—30 ±5 meters x 0 25 ± 02 mm i d , 94% methyl, 5% phenyl, 1% vinyl silicone bonded phase fused silica capillary col-
umn (DB-5).
  Temperature program—Five minutes at 30 °C, 30-280 °C at 8 °C per minute, isothermal at 280 °C until benzo(ghi)perylene
elutes
  Gas velocity—30 ±5 cm/sec at 30 °C
  2 Retention times are from EPA Method 1625, Revision C, using a capillary column, and are intended to be consistent for all
analytes in Tables 3 and 4 of this attachment
  3 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries

                              TABLE 5—QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Analyte
acetophenone 1
alpha-terpmeol
carbazole 1
o-cresol '
p-cresol2 . .
n-decane 1 	
2,3-dichloroamhne 1 . ...
n-octadecane 1
pyridme2
Test conclu-
sion
(W3/L)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Limits for s
(tig/L)
51
47
71
17
23
22
70
13
10
ns
Range for X
(ng/L)
23-254
46-163
15-278
79-111
30-146
11-617
D-651
40-160
52-147
7-392
Range for
P, P>(%)
61-144
58-156
46-134
73-131
55-126
76-107
D-ns
68-134
65-123
33-158
  s = Standard deviation for four recovery measurements, in ng/L (Section 8 2)
  X = Average recovery for four recovery measurements in ug/L (Section 8 2)
  P,Ps = Percent recovery measured (Section 8.3, Section 8 4)
  D = Detected, result must be greater than zero.
  ns = no specification, limit is outside the range that can be measured reliably
  1 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment industry.
  2 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries
          METHOD 1613, REVISION B

 retro- Through Octa-Chlonnated Dioxins and
    Furans by Isotope Dilution HRGC/HRMS

          1.0  Scope and Application
  1.1   This method is  for determination  of
tetra-  through octa-ohlorinated dibenzo-p-
dioxins (CDDs) and dibenzofurans (CDFs)  in
water,  soil,  sediment,  sludge,  tissue,  and
other sample matrices by high resolution gas
chromatography/high resolution mass spec-
trometry (HRGC/HRMS).  The method is for
use in BPA's data gathering and monitoring
programs  associated with the  Clean Water
Act,  the Resource  Conservation and  Recov-
ery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response,  Compensation  and Liability Act,
and the Safe Drinking Water Act. The meth-
od is based on a compilation of EPA, indus-
try,  commercial  laboratory,  and  academic
methods (References 1-6).
  1.2  The    seventeen   2,3,7,8-substituted
CDDs/CDFs listed in Table  1 may be deter-
mined  by this  method. Specifications  are
also provided for separate  determination of
2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin   (2,3,7,8-
TCDD)  and  2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzofuran
(2,3,7,8-TCDF).
  1.3  The detection limits and quantitation
levels in  this method are usually dependent
on the  level of interferences rather than in-
strumental limitations. The minimum levels
(MLs) in  Table 2  are the levels at which the
CDDs/CDFs can be determined with no inter-
ferences  present.  The  Method  Detection
                                             238

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
Limit (MDL) for 2,3,7,8-TCDD has been deter-
mined  as  4.4 pg/L  (parts-per-quadrillion)
using this method.
  1.4  The  GO/MS portions of this method
are for use only by analysts experienced with
HRGC/HRMS or under the close  supervision
of such  qualified persons. Each laboratory
that uses this method must demonstrate the
ability to generate acceptable results using
the procedure in Section 9.2.
  1.5  This method is  "performance-based".
The analyst  is  permitted to  modify  the
method to overcome interferences or lower
the cost of measurements, provided that all
performance criteria in this method are met.
The requirements for  establishing- method
equivalency are given in Section 9.1.2.
  1.6  Any modification of this method, be-
yond those expressly permitted, shall be con-
sidered  a major modification  subject to ap-
plication and approval of alternate test pro-
cedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.S.

          2.0   Summary of Method

  Flow charts that summarize procedures for
sample preparation, extraction, and analysis
are given in  Figure 1 for aqueous and solid
samples, Figure  2 for  multi-phase samples,
and Figure 3 for tissue samples.
  2.1  Extraction.
  2.1.1 Aqueous   samples  (samples   con-
taining  less   than   1%   solids)—Stable
isotopically labeled analogs  of 15  of  the
2,3,7,8-substituted CDDs/CDFs  are  spiked
into a 1 L sample,  and  the  sample is ex-
tracted by one of three procedures:
  2.1.1.1  Samples containing no visible par-
ticles are extracted with methylene chloride
in a separatory funnel or by the  solid-phase
extraction technique summarized in Section
2.1.1.3. The extract is concentrated for clean-
up.
  2.1.1.2  Samples containing  visible  par-
ticles are vacuum filtered through a glass-
fiber filter. The filter is extracted in a Soxh-
let/Dean-Stark (SDS)  extractor  (Reference
7), and the filtrate is  extracted with meth-
ylene chloride in a separatory funnel. The
methylene chloride extract is concentrated
and combined with the  SDS extract prior to
cleanup.
  2.1.1.3  The  sample   is  vacuum  filtered
through a glass-fiber filter on top of a solid-
phase extraction  (SPE) disk. The filter  and
disk are  extracted in an SDS  extractor,  and
the extract is concentrated for cleanup.
  2.1.2 Solid,  semi-solid,  and multi-phase
samples  (but not tissue)—The labeled com-
pounds are spiked into a  sample  containing
10 g  (dry weight) of  solids.  Samples  con-
taining multiple  phases are pressure filtered
and any  aqueous liquid is discarded.  Coarse
solids are ground or homogenized. Any non-
aqueous  liquid from multi-phase samples is
combined with the solids and extracted in an
SDS extractor. The extract is concentrated
for cleanup.
  2.1.3  Fish and other tissue—The sample is
extracted by one of two procedures:
  2.1.3.1  Soxhlet or  SDS extraction—A 20 g
aliquot of sample is homogenized, and a 10 g
aliquot is spiked  with  the  labeled com-
pounds. The  sample is mixed with sodium
sulfate, allowed to dry for 12-24 hours, and
extracted for 18-24 hours using methylene
chloride:hexane (1:1) in a Soxhlet extractor.
The extract is evaporated to dryness, and the
lipid content is determined.
  2.1.3.2  HC1 digestion—A 20 g aliquot is ho-
mogenized, and a 10 g  aliquot is placed in a
bottle and  spiked with the  labeled com-
pounds. After equilibration, 200 mL of hydro-
chloric acid and 200 mL of methylene chlo-
ride:hexane (1:1) are added, and the bottle is
agitated for 12-24 hours. The extract is evap-
orated to dryness, and the lipid content is
determined.
  2.2  After  extraction,  "Cl4-labeled 2,3,7,8-
TCDD is added to each  extract to measure
the efficiency of the cleanup process. Sample
cleanups may include  back-extraction with
acid and/or  base,  and  gel permeation, alu-
mina,  silica gel, Florisil  and  activated car-
bon chromatography. High-performance liq-
uid chromatography (HPLC) can be used for
further isolation  of  the  2,3,7,8-isomers  or
other specific isomers or congeners. Prior to
the cleanup  procedures  cited above, tissue
extracts are  cleaned up using an anthropo-
genic isolation column, a batch silica gel ad-
sorption, or sulfuric acid and base back-ex-
traction, depending on the tissue extraction
procedure used.
  2.3  After  cleanup,  the  extract  is  con-
centrated to near dryness. Immediately prior
to injection, internal standards are added to
each extract, and an aliquot of the extract is
injected into  the gas chromatograph. The
analytes are separated by the  GC  and de-
tected by a  high-resolution  (>10,000) mass
spectrometer. Two exact m/z's are monitored
for each analyte.
  2.4  An  individual CDD/CDF is identified
by comparing the GC retention time and ion-
abundance ratio of two exact  m/z's  with the
corresponding retention time of an authentic
standard and the theoretical or acquired ion-
abundance ratio of the two exact m/z's. The
non-2,3,7,8 substituted isomers and congeners
are identified when retention times and ion-
abundance ratios  agree  within predefined
limits.  Isomer specificity  for 2,3,7,8-TCDD
and 2,3,7,8-TCDF  is achieved  using  GC col-
umns that resolve these isomers from the
other tetra-lsomers.
  2.5  Quantitative  analysis  is  performed
using  selected ion  current profile  (SICP)
areas, in one of three ways:
  2.5.1  For the 15 2,3,7,8-substituted CDDs/
CDFs with labeled analogs (see Table 1), the
GC/MS  system is  calibrated,  and the con-
centration of each compound  is determined
using the isotope dilution technique.
                                         239

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  2.5.2  For 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD, OCDF, and the
labeled  compounds, the  GC/MS system is
calibrated  and  the concentration  of  each
compound is determined using the  internal
standard technique.
  2.5.3  For  non-2,3,7,8-substituted  isomers
and  for  all  isomers  at  a given  level  of
chlorination  (i.e., total  TCDD),  concentra-
tions are determined using response factors
from calibration of the CDDs/CDFs at the
same level of chlorination.
  2.6 The quality of the analysis is assured
through reproducible calibration and testing
of the  extraction, cleanup, and GC/MS sys-
tems.

              3.0 Definitions

  Definitions are given in the glossary at the
end of this method.

     4.0  Contamination ana Interferences

  4.1 Solvents,   reagents,  glassware,  and
other sample processing hardware may yield
artifacts and/or  elevated baselines  causing
misinterpretation of  chromatograms  (Ref-
erences 8-9). Specific  selection of reagents
and purification of solvents by distillation in
all-glass systems may be required. Where
possible, reagents are  cleaned by extraction
or solvent rinse.
  4.2 Proper cleaning  of  glassware is ex-
tremely important, because glassware  may
not only contaminate the  samples but may
also  remove the  analytes of interest by ad-
sorption on the glass surface.
  4.2.1  Glassware should be rinsed with sol-
vent and washed with a detergent solution as
soon after use as is practical. Sonication of
glassware containing  a detergent  solution
for approximately 30 seconds may aid  in
cleaning. Glassware with  removable parts,
particularly   separatory   funnels   with
fluoropolymer stopcocks, must be disassem-
bled prior to detergent washing.
  4.2.2  After detergent  washing, glassware
should  be  rinsed  immediately,  first  with
methanol, then with hot tap water.  The tap
water rinse is followed by  another methanol
rinse,  then  acetone,  and then  methylene
chloride.
  4.2.3  Do not bake reusable glassware in an
oven as a routine  part of cleaning. Baking
may be  warranted after particularly dirty
samples are encountered but should be mini-
mized, as repeated baking of glassware may
cause active sites on the glass surface that
will  irreversibly adsorb CDDs/CDFs.
  4.2.4  Immediately prior to use, the  Soxh-
let apparatus should be pre-extracted  with
toluene for approximately three hours (see
Sections 12.3.1  through 12.3.3).  Separatory
funnels should  be shaken with methylene
chloride/toluene (80/20 mixture) for two min-
utes, drained,  and then  shaken with  pure
methylene chloride for two minutes.
  4.3  All  materials  used in  the  analysis
shall be demonstrated to be free from inter-
ferences by running reference matrix method
blanks initially and with each  sample batch
(samples  started  through  the  extraction
process on a given 12-hour shift, to a max-
imum of 20 samples).
  4.3.1  The reference matrix must simulate,
as closely as possible, the  sample matrix
under  test.  Ideally,  the  reference matrix
should not contain the CDDs/CDFs in detect-
able amounts, but should contain potential
interferents in the concentrations  expected
to be found in the samples to be analyzed.
For example,  a reference sample of human
adipose         tissue          containing
pentachloronaphthalene can be used to exer-
cise the cleanup systems when samples con-
taining  pentachloronaphthalene   are   ex-
pected.
  4.3.2  When a reference  matrix that simu-
lates  the  sample matrix  under test is  not
available, reagent water (Section 7.6.1)  can
be used  to  simulate  water  samples; play-
ground sand  (Section  7.6.2)  or  white quartz
sand (Section 7.3.2) can be used to  simulate
soils; filter paper (Section 7.6.3) can be used
to simulate  papers  and similar materials;
and corn  oil (Section 7.6.4) can be used to
simulate tissues.
  4.4  Interferences coextracted from sam-
ples will vary considerably from  source to
source, depending on the diversity of the  site
being sampled. Interfering compounds may
be present at concentrations several orders
of magnitude higher than the CDDs/CDFs.
The most  frequently encountered inter-
ferences are chlorinated biphenyls,  methoxy
biphenyls,     hydroxydiphenyl      ethers,
benzylphenyl ethers, polynuclear aromatics,
and pesticides. Because very  low  levels of
CDDs/CDFs  are  measured by  this  method,
the elimination of interferences is essential.
The cleanup steps given in Section  13 can be
used  to reduce or  eliminate  these inter-
ferences and thereby permit reliable deter-
mination  of the CDDs/CDFs at the levels
shown in Table 2.
  4.5  Bach   piece  of  reusable  glassware
should be numbered to associate that glass-
ware with the processing of a particular sam-
ple. This will assist the laboratory  in track-
ing possible sources of contamination for in-
dividual samples, identifying glassware asso-
ciated with  highly  contaminated  samples
that may require extra cleaning, and deter-
mining when glassware should be discarded.
  4.6  Cleanup of  tissue—The  natural lipid
content of tissue can interfere in  the anal-
ysis of tissue samples for  the CDDs/CDFs.
The lipid contents of different species  and
portions of tissue can vary widely. Lipids are
soluble to varying degrees in various organic
solvents and  may  be present  in sufficient
quantity   to   overwhelm   the   column
chromatographic  cleanup procedures  used
for cleanup of sample extracts. Lipids must
                                          240

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
be removed by the lipid removal procedures
in Section 13.7, followed by alumina (Section
13.4) or Plorisil (Section 13.8), and carbon
(Section 13.5) as minimum additional clean-
up  steps.  If chlorodiphenyl  ethers  are  de-
tected, as indicated by the presence of peaks
at  the exact  m/z's monitored  for  these
interferents, alumina and/or Florisil  cleanup
must be employed to eliminate these inter-
ferences.

                5.0 Safety
  5.1  The toxicity or  carcinogenicity  of
each compound or reagent used in this meth-
od has not been precisely determined; how-
ever,  each  chemical compound should  be
treated as a potential health hazard. Expo-
sure to these  compounds should be  reduced
to the lowest possible level.
  5.1.1  The 2,3,7,8-TCDD isomer  has been
found  to  be  acnegenic,  carcinogenic, and
teratogenic in laboratory animal studies. It
is soluble in water to approximately 200  ppt
and in organic solvents to 0.14%. On the basis
of the available toxicological  and physical
properties of 2,3,7,8-TCDD, all  of the CDDs/
CDPs  should  be  handled only by  highly
trained personnel  thoroughly familiar with
handling and cautionary procedures  and  the
associated risks.
  5.1.2  It is recommended that the labora-
tory purchase  dilute standard  solutions of
the analytes in this method. However, if pri-
mary solutions are prepared, they shall  be
prepared in a  hood, and a NIOSH/MESA  ap-
proved  toxic gas  respirator shall be worn
when high concentrations are handled.
  5.2  The  laboratory  is  responsible  for
maintaining a  current awareness  file  of
OSHA  regulations  regarding the  safe han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file of material safety data
sheets (MSDSs) should also be made avail-
able to all personnel involved in these anal-
yses. It is also suggested that the laboratory
perform personal hygiene monitoring of each
analyst who uses this method  and that  the
results of this monitoring be made available
to the analyst. Additional information  on
laboratory safety can be found in References
10-13. The references and bibliography at  the
end of Reference  13  are particularly com-
prehensive in  dealing with the general sub-
ject of laboratory safety.
  5.3  The CDDs/CDPs and samples suspected
to contain  these  compounds  are  handled
using essentially the same techniques em-
ployed in  handling radioactive or  infectious
materials. Well-ventilated, controlled access
laboratories are required. Assistance  in eval-
uating the health  hazards of particular lab-
oratory conditions may be  obtained from
certain  consulting laboratories and  from
State Departments of Health or Labor, many
of which  have  an  industrial health  service.
The CDDs/CDFs are extremely toxic to lab-
oratory animals. Each laboratory must  de-
velop a strict safety program for  handling
these  compounds.  The  practices  in  Ref-
erences 2 and 14 are highly recommended.
  5.3.1 Facility—When  finely divided sam-
ples (dusts, soils, dry chemicals) are handled,
all operations (including removal of samples
from  sample containers, weighing,  transfer-
ring,  and mixing)  should be performed in a
glove box demonstrated to be leak tight or in
a fume hood demonstrated to have  adequate
air flow. Gross losses to  the laboratory ven-
tilation system  must not  be  allowed. Han-
dling of the dilute solutions normally used in
analytical and animal work presents no in-
halation hazards except in  the case  of an ac-
cident.
  5.3.2 Protective   equipment—Disposable
plastic  gloves,  apron or  lab  coat,  safety
glasses or mask, and a  glove box  or fume
hood  adequate for radioactive work should
be  used. During analytical operations that
may give rise to aerosols or dusts, personnel
should wear respirators  equipped with acti-
vated carbon filters.  Eye  protection equip-
ment (preferably full face shields)  must be
worn while working with exposed samples or
pure analytical  standards. Latex gloves are
commonly used  to reduce exposure of the
hands. When handling samples suspected or
known to contain high concentrations of the
CDDs/CDFs, an additional  set of gloves can
also be worn beneath the latex gloves.
  5.3.3 Training—Workers  must  be trained
in the proper method of removing  contami-
nated  gloves  and clothing  without   con-
tacting the exterior surfaces.
  5.3.4 Personal hygiene—Hands and  fore-
arms should be washed thoroughly after each
manipulation  and before  breaks  (coffee,
lunch, and shift).
  5.3.5 Confinement—Isolated  work   areas
posted with signs, segregated glassware and
tools, and plastic absorbent paper on bench
tops will aid in confining contamination.
  5.3.6 Effluent  vapors—The   effluents of
sample splitters  from the gas chromatograph
(OrC) and from roughing  pumps on the mass
spectrometer (MS) should  pass  through ei-
ther a column of  activated charcoal  or be
bubbled  through a trap containing oil or
high-boiling alcohols to  condense CDD/CDF
vapors.
  5.3.7 Waste  Handling—Good technique in-
cludes  minimizing   contaminated waste.
Plastic bag  liners should be used  in waste
cans.  Janitors and other personnel  must be
trained in the safe handling of waste.
  5.3.8 Decontamination
  5.3.8.1  Decontamination  of personnel—Use
any mild soap with plenty of scrubbing ac-
tion.
  5.3.8.2  Glassware,  tools, and  surfaces—
Chlorothene NU Solvent is the least  toxic
solvent shown to be  effective. Satisfactory
cleaning may be  accomplished by rinsing
with Chlorothene, then washing with any de-
tergent and water.  If glassware is first rinsed
                                         241

-------
Ft.  136, App. A, Meth.  1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
with solvent, then the dish water may be dis-
posed of in the sewer. Given the cost of dis-
posal,  it is  prudent to  minimize solvent
wastes.
  5.3.9  Laundry—Clothing known to be con-
taminated should  be  collected in  plastic
bags. Persons who convey the bags and laun-
der the clothing should be advised of the haz-
ard and  trained in  proper handling.  The
clothing may be  put into a  washer without
contact if the launderer knows of the poten-
tial  problem.  The washer  should be  run
through  a cycle before being used  again for
other clothing.
  5.3.10 Wipe tests—A useful method of de-
termining cleanliness of work surfaces  and
tools is to wipe the surface  with a piece of
filter paper.  Extraction and analysis by GC
with an electron  capture detector (BCD) can
achieve  a limit  of detection of 0.1  |ig per
wipe; analysis using this method can achieve
an even lower detection limit. Less than 0.1
^ig per  wipe indicates acceptable cleanliness;
anything higher  warrants further  cleaning.
More than 10 |ig on a  wipe constitutes an
acute hazard and requires prompt cleaning
before  further use of the equipment or work
space,  and indicates that unacceptable work
practices have been employed.
  5.3.11 Table  or wrist-action  shaker—The
use of  a  table or wrist-action shaker for ex-
traction  of tissues presents the possibility of
breakage of the extraction  bottle and spill-
age of  acid and flammable organic solvent. A
secondary containment system around the
shaker is suggested to prevent the  spread of
acid and solvents  in  the event of  such  a
breakage. The speed and intensity of shaking
action  should also  be adjusted  to  minimize
the possibility of breakage.

        6.0   Apparatus and Materials

  NOTE:  Brand names,  suppliers,   and part
numbers  are for illustration purposes only
and no endorsement is implied. Equivalent
performance  may be achieved  using appa-
ratus and materials other than those speci-
fied here. Meeting the performance require-
ments  of this method is the responsibility of
the laboratory.

  6.1  Sampling Equipment  for Discrete or
Composite Sampling
  6.1.1  Sample bottles and caps
  6.1.1.1  Liquid samples (waters, sludges and
similar materials containing 5%  solids or
less)—Sample bottle, amber glass, 1.1 L min-
imum, with screw cap.
  6.1.1.2  Solid  samples  (soils,  sediments,
sludges,  paper  pulps, filter  cake,  compost,
and similar  materials that contain more
than 5%  solids)—Sample bottle, wide  mouth,
amber  glass,  500 mL minimum.
  6.1.1.3  If amber bottles are not available,
samples shall be protected from light.
  6.1.1.4  Bottle caps—Threaded to fit sample
bottles.   Caps   shall   be   lined   with
fluoropolymer.
  6.1.1.5  Cleaning-
  6.1.1.5.1  Bottles  are   detergent  water
washed, then solvent rinsed before use.
  6.1.1.5.2  Liners   are   detergent  water
washed, rinsed with reagent water (Section
7.6.1) followed by solvent, and baked at ap-
proximately 200 °C for a minimum  of 1  hour
prior to use.
  6.1.2  Compositing  equipment—Automatic
or manual compositing system incorporating
glass containers cleaned per bottle cleaning
procedure above. Only glass or fluoropolymer
tubing shall be used. If the sampler uses a
peristaltic pump, a  minimum length of  com-
pressible silicone rubber tubing may be used
in the pump only. Before  use,  the tubing
shall be thoroughly  rinsed with methanol,
followed by repeated rinsing with reagent
water  to  minimize sample  contamination.
An integrating flow meter is used to collect
proportional composite samples.
  6.2 Equipment for  Glassware  Cleaning—
Laboratory sink with  overhead fume hood.
  6.3 Equipment for Sample Preparation
  6.3.1  Laboratory  fume  hood of sufficient
size to contain the sample preparation equip-
ment listed below.
  6.3.2  Glove box (optional).
  6.3.3  Tissue homogenizer—VirTis Model 45
Macro   homogenizer  (American Scientific
Products H-3515,  or equivalent)  with stain-
less steel Macro-shaft and Turbo-shear blade.
  6.3.4  Meat grinder—Hobart, or equivalent,
with 3-5 mm holes in inner plate.
  6.3.5  Equipment  for  determining percent
moisture
  6.3.5.1  Oven—Capable  of  maintaining  a
temperature of 110 ±5 °C.
  6.3.5.2  Dessicator.
  6.3.6  Balances
  6.3.6.1  Analytical—Capable of weighing 0.1
mg.
  6.3.6.2  Top loading—Capable of  weighing
10 mg.
  6.4  Extraction Apparatus
  6.4.1  Water samples
  6.4.1.1  pH meter, with  combination  glass
electrode.
  6.4.1.2  pH paper,  wide range (Hydrion Pa-
pers, or equivalent).
  6.4.1.3  Graduated cylinder, 1 L  capacity.
  6.4.1.4  Liquid/liquid    extraction—Sepa-
ratory funnels, 250 mL, 500 mL, and 2000 mL,
with fluoropolymer stopcocks.
  6.4.1.5  Solid-phase extraction
  6.4.1.5.1  One liter filtration apparatus, in-
cluding  glass  funnel,  glass frit   support,
clamp, adapter, stopper, filtration flask, and
vacuum tubing  (Figure 4).  For  wastewater
samples, the apparatus should accept  90 or
144 mm disks. For  drinking water or other
samples containing low solids, smaller  disks
may be used.
                                          242

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
  6.4.1.5.2 Vacuum source capable of main-
taining 25 in. Hg, equipped with shutoff valve
and vacuum gauge.
  6.4.1.5.3 Glass-fiber filter—Whatman GMF
150 (or equivalent), 1 micron pore size, to fit
filtration apparatus in Section 6.4.1.5.1.
  6.4.1.5.4 Solid-phase extraction disk  con-
taining  octadecyl  (Cis)  bonded silica  uni-
formly  enmeshed in an inert matrix—Fisher
Scientific 14-378F (or equivalent), to  fit fil-
tration apparatus in Section 6.4.1.5.1.
  6.4.2  Soxhlet/Dean-Stark (SDS) extractor
(Figure 5)—For filters and solid/sludge sam-
ples.
  6.4.2.1  Soxhlet—50 mm ID, 200 mL  capac-
ity with 500 mL flask (Cal-Glass LG-6900, or
equivalent, except substitute 500 mL  round-
bottom flask for 300 mL flat-bottom flask).
  6.4.2.2  Thimble—43 x  123 to  fit  Soxhlet
(Cal-Glass LG-6901-122, or equivalent).
  6.4.2.3  Moisture trap—Dean  Stark or Bar-
ret with fluoropolymer stopcock, to fit Soxh-
let.
  6.4.2.4  Heating mantle—Hemispherical, to
fit 500 mL round-bottom flask (Cal-Glass LG-
8801-112, or equivalent).
  6.4.2.5  Variable   transformer—Powerstat
(or equivalent), 110 volt, 10 amp.
  6.4.3  Apparatus for extraction of tissue.
  6.4.3.1  Bottle for  extraction (if digestion/
extraction using HC1 is used)" 500-600 mL
wide-mouth clear glass, with fluoropolymer-
lined cap.
  6.4.3.2  Bottle for  back-extraction—100-200
mL   narrow-mouth  clear    glass   with
fluoropolymer-lined cap.
  6.4.3.3  Mechanical  shaker—Wrist-action
or platform-type  rotary shaker that  pro-
duces    vigorous    agitation    (Sybron
Thermolyne  Model  LE  "Big  Bill"  rotator/
shaker, or equivalent).
  6.4.3.4  Rack attached to shaker  table to
permit agitation of four to nine samples si-
multaneously.
  6.4.4  Beakers—400-500 mL.
  6.4.5  Spatulas—Stainless steel.
  6.5  Filtration Apparatus.
  6.5.1  Pyrex glass  wool—Solvent-extracted
by SDS for three hours minimum.
  NOTE: Baking glass wool may cause active
sites  that will  irreversibly   adsorb  CDDs/
CDFs.

  6.5.2  Glass funnel—125-250 mL.
  6.5.3  Glass-fiber   filter   paper—Whatman
GF/D (or equivalent), to  fit glass funnel in
Section 6.5.2.
  6.5.4  Drying column—15-20 mm ID  Pyrex
chromatographic  column  equipped   with
coarse-glass frit or glass-wool plug.
  6.5.5  Buchner funnel—15 cm.
  6.5.6  Glass-fiber    filter   paper—to   fit
Buchner funnel in Section 6.5.5.
  6.5.7  Filtration flasks—1.5-2.0 L, with side
arm.
  6.5.8  Pressure    filtration    apparatus—
Millipore YT30 142 HW, or equivalent.
  6.6  Centrifuge Apparatus.
  6.6.1  Centrifuge—Capable of rotating 500
mL centrifuge bottles  or 15 mL centrifuge
tubes at 5,000 rpm minimum.
  6.6.2  Centrifuge  bottles—500   mL,   with
screw-caps, to fit centrifuge.
  6.6.3  Centrifuge  tubes—12-15   mL,   with
screw-caps, to fit centrifuge.
  6.7  Cleanup Apparatus.
  6.7.1  Automated  gel  permeation  chro-
matograph  (Analytical Biochemical  Labs,
Inc,  Columbia,  MO,  Model GPC Autoprep
1002, or equivalent).
  6.7.1.1  Column—600-700 mm  long x 25 mm
ID, packed with 70 g of
SX-3 Bio-beads (Bio-Rad Laboratories,  Rich-
mond, CA, or equivalent).
  6.7.1.2  Syringe—10 mL, with Luer fitting.
  6.7.1.3  Syringe   filter   holder—stainless
steel, and glass-fiber or fluoropolymer filters
(Gelman 4310,  or equivalent).
  6.7.1.4  UV detectors—254 nm,  preparative
or semi-preparative  flow  cell  (Isco,   Inc.,
Type  6; Schmadzu, 5 mm path length; Beck-
man-Altex 152W, 8 (iL micro-prep flow cell, 2
mm path; Pharmacia UV-1, 3  mm flow cell;
LDC  Milton-Roy  UV-3,  monitor #1203;  or
equivalent).
  6.7.2  Reverse-phase high-performance liq-
uid chromatograph.
  6.7.2.1  Column oven and detector—Perkin-
Elmer Model LC-65T (or equivalent) operated
at 0.02 AUFS at 235 nm.
  6.7.2.2  Injector—Rheodyne 7120 (or equiva-
lent) with 50 |iL sample  loop.
  6.7.2.3  Column—Two  6.2 mm  x 250  mm
Zorbax-ODS columns in series (DuPont In-
struments Division,  Wilmington,   DE,  or
equivalent), operated at 50 °C with  2.0 mL/
min methanol isocratic  effluent.
  6.7.2.4  Pump—Altex 110A (or equivalent).
  6.7.3  Pipets,
  6.7.3.1  Disposable, pasteur—150 mm long x
5-mm  ID  (Fisher  Scientific  13-678-6A,  or
equivalent).
  6.7.3.2  Disposable,  serological—10  mL  (6
mm ID).
  6.7.4  Glass chromatographic columns.
  6.7.4.1  150 mm long x 8-mm ID, (Kontes K-
420155, or equivalent) with coarse-glass frit
or glass-wool plug and 250 mL reservoir.
  6.7.4.2  200  mm  long  x  15  mm ID,  with
coarse-glass frit or glass-wool plug  and 250
mL reservoir.
  6.7.4.3  300 mm long x 25  mm ID, with 300
mL reservoir and glass  or fluoropolymer
stopcock.
  6.7.5  Stirring apparatus  for batch silica
cleanup of tissue extracts.
  6.7.5.1 Mechanical stirrer—Corning Model
320, or equivalent.
  6.7.5.2  Bottle—500-600  mL    wide-mouth
clear glass.
  6.7.6  Oven—For baking and  storage of ad-
sorbents, capable of maintaining a constant
temperature (±5  °C) in the range of 105-250 °C.
  6.8  Concentration Apparatus.
                                          243

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  6.8.1  Rotary           evaporator—Buohl/
Brinkman-American  Scientific  No. E5045-10
or equivalent, equipped with a variable tem-
perature water bath.
  6.8.1.1  Vacuum  source for rotary evapo-
rator equipped  with  shutoff  valve at the
evaporator and vacuum gauge.
  6.8.1.2  A  recirculating  water pump  and
chiller are recommended, as use of tap water
for cooling the evaporator wastes  large vol-
umes of water and can lead to inconsistent
performance as water temperatures and pres-
sures vary.
  6.8.1.3  Round-bottom  flask—100  mL  and
500 mL or larger, with ground-glass fitting
compatible with the rotary evaporator.
  6.8.2  Kuderna-Danish (K-D) Concentrator.
  6.8.2.1  Concentrator  tube—10  mL, grad-
uated (Kontes K-570050-1025,  or equivalent)
with calibration verified. Ground-glass stop-
per (size 19/22 joint) is used to prevent evapo-
ration of extracts.
  6.8.2.2  Evaporation flask—500 mL (Kontes
K-570001-0500,  or  equivalent),  attached  to
concentrator tube  with springs (Kontes K-
662750-0012 or equivalent).
  6.8.2.3  Snyder  column—Three-ball macro
(Kontes K-503000-0232, or equivalent).
  6.8.2.4  Boiling chips.
  6.8.2.4.1 Glass or silicon carbide—Approxi-
mately 10/40 mesh, extracted with methylene
chloride and baked at 450 °C for  one hour
minimum.
  6.8.2.4.2 Fluoropolymer    (optional)—Ex-
tracted with methylene chloride.
  6.8.2.5  Water  bath—Heated, with concen-
tric ring cover,  capable of maintaining  a
temperature within ±2 °C, installed in a fume
hood.
  6.8.3  Nitrogen   blowdown   apparatus—
Equipped with water bath controlled in the
range of 30-60 °C (N-Evap, Organomation As-
sociates, Inc., South  Berlin, MA, or equiva-
lent), installed in a fume hood.
  6.8.4   Sample vials.
  6.8.4.1  Amber    glass—2-5   mL   with
fluoropolymer-lined screw-cap.
  6.8.4.2  Glass—0.3   mL,   conical,   with
fluoropolymer-lined screw or crimp cap.
  6.9  Gas   Chromatograph—Shall   have
splitless or on-column injection port for cap-
illary  column,  temperature  program  with
isothermal hold, and shall meet all of the
performance specifications in Section 10.
  6.9.1   GC  column for CDDs/CDFs and for
isomer  specificity  for  2,3,7,8-TCDD—60±5  m
long x 0.32±0.02 mm ID; 0.25 (im 5% phenyl,
94% methyl, 1% vinyl silicone bonded-phase
fused-silica capillary column (J&W DB-5,  or
equivalent).
  6.9.2   GC column for isomer specificity for
2,3,7,8-TCDF—30±5 m  long x 0.32±0.02 mm ID;
0.25 um  bonded-phase fused-silica  capillary
column (J&W DB-225, or equivalent).
  6.10  Mass Spectrometer—28--40 eV electron
impact  ionization, shall be capable of repet-
itively selectively monitoring 12 exact m/z's
minimum at high resolution (>10,000) during
a period of approximately one second, and
shall meet all of the performance specifica-
tions in Section 10.
  6.11  GC/MS  Interface—The  mass   spec-
trometer (MS) shall be interfaced to the GC
such that the end of the capillary column
terminates within 1 cm of the ion source but
does not intercept the electron or ion beams.
  6.12  Data  System—Capable  of  collecting,
recording, and storing MS data.

        7.0  Reagents and Standards

  7.1  pH Adjustment and Back-Extraction.
  7.1.1  Potassium  hydroxide—Dissolve  20 g
reagent grade KOH in 100 mL reagent water.
  7.1.2  Sulfuric  acid—Reagent grade  (spe-
cific gravity 1.84).
  7.1.3  Hydrochloric   acid—Reagent  grade,
6N.
  7.1.4  Sodium   chloride—Reagent   grade,
prepare at  5%   (w/v)  solution  in reagent
water.
  7.2  Solution Drying and Evaporation.
  7.2.1  Solution drying—Sodium sulfate, re-
agent  grade, granular,  anhydrous  (Baker
3375, or equivalent),  rinsed with  methylene
chloride (20 mL/g), baked at 400  CC for one
hour minimum, cooled in a dessicator, and
stored in a  pre-cleaned glass bottle with
screw-cap that  prevents  moisture from en-
tering. If, after  heating, the sodium sulfate
develops a noticeable grayish cast (due  to
the presence of carbon in the crystal ma-
trix),  that batch of reagent is not suitable
for use and should be discarded.  Extraction
with methylene chloride (as opposed to sim-
ple rinsing) and baking at a lower tempera-
ture may  produce sodium  sulfate that  is
suitable for use.
  7.2.2  Tissue drying—Sodium sulfate, rea-
gent grade,  powdered, treated and stored as
above.
  7.2.3  Prepurified nitrogen.
  7.3  Extraction.
  7.3.1  Solvents—Acetone,         toluene,
cyclohexane, hexane, methanol,  methylene
chloride, and nonane; distilled in glass, pes-
ticide  quality,  lot-certified  to  be free  of
interferences.
  7.3.2  White quartz sand, 60/70  mesh—For
Soxhlet/Dean-Stark   extraction    (Aldrich
Chemical, Cat.  No. 27^37-9, or equivalent).
Bake at 450 °C for four hours minimum.
  7.4  GPC Calibration Solution—Prepare a
solution containing 300 mg/mL corn  oil, 15
mg/mL bis(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate, 1.4 mg/
mL pentachlorophenol, 0.1 mg/mL perylene,
and 0.5 mg/mL sulfur.
  7.5  Adsorbents for  Sample Cleanup.
  7.5.1  Silica gel.
  7.5.1.1  Activated silica  gel—100-200 mesh,
Supelco 1-3651 (or equivalent), rinsed  with
methylene chloride,  baked at 180 °C  for a
minimum of one hour, cooled in a dessicator,
and stored in a  precleaned glass bottle  with
                                          244

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth.  1613
screw-cap that  prevents  moisture from  en-
tering.
  7.5.1.2  Acid  silica gel  (30% w/w)—Thor-
oughly  mix 44.0 g of concentrated sulfuric
acid with 100.0 g of activated silica gel in a
clean container. Break up aggregates with a
stirring rod until a uniform mixture is  ob-
tained.   Store   in   a   bottle   with   a
fluoropolymer-lined screw-cap.
  7.5.1.3  Basic silica gel—Thoroughly mix 30
g of IN sodium hydroxide with 100 g of acti-
vated silica gel in a clean container.  Break
up aggregates with a stirring rod until a uni-
form mixture is obtained. Store in a bottle
with a fluoropolymer-lined screw-cap.
  7.5.1.4  Potassium silicate.
  7.5.1.4.1  Dissolve 56 g of high purity potas-
sium hydroxide  (Aldrich,  or  equivalent) in
300 mL of methanol in a 750-1000 mL flat-bot-
tom flask.
  7.5.1.4.2  Add 100  g of silica gel and a stir-
ring bar, and stir on a hot plate at 60-70 °C
for one to two hours.
  7.5.1.4.3  Decant  the liquid and  rinse  the
potassium  silicate twice with 100 mL por-
tions of methanol,  followed by a single rinse
with 100 mL of methylene chloride.
  7.5.1.4.4  Spread the potassium silicate on
solvent-rinsed aluminum foil and dry for two
to four hours in a hood.
  7.5.1.4.5  Activate overnight at 200-250 °C.
  7.5.2   Alumina—Either one of two types of
alumina, acid or basic, may be used in  the
cleanup of sample extracts, provided that  the
laboratory can meet the  performance speci-
fications for the recovery of labeled  com-
pounds  described in Section  9.3.  The  same
type of alumina must be used for all samples,
including those used to demonstrate initial
precision and recovery (Section 9.2) and  on-
going precision and recovery (Section 15.5).
  7.5.2.1  Acid alumina—Supelco 19996-6C  (or
equivalent). Activate by heating to 130 °C for
a minimum of 12 hours.
  7.5.2.2  Basic  alumina—Supelco  19944-6C
(or equivalent). Activate by heating to 600 °C
for a minimum of 24 hours. Alternatively,  ac-
tivate by heating in a tube furnace at 650-700
°C under an  air flow rate of approximately
400 cc/minute. Do not heat over 700 °C, as this
can  lead to reduced capacity for  retaining
the  analytes. Store at 130 °C in a covered
flask. Use within five days of baking.
  7.5.3  Carbon.
  7.5.3.1  Carbopak  C—(Supelco   1-0258,  or
equivalent).
  7.5.3.2  Celite   545—(Supelco  2-0199,  or
equivalent).
  7.5.3.3  Thoroughly mix 9.0 g Carbopak C
and  41.0 g Celite 545 to produce an 18% w/w
mixture. Activate the mixture at 130 °C for a
minimum of six hours. Store in a dessicator.
  7.5.4  Anthropogenic  isolation   column—
Pack the column in Section 6.7.4.3 from bot-
tom to top with the following:
  7.5.4.1  2 g silica gel (Section 7.5.1.1).
  7.5.4.2  2  g  potassium  silicate  (Section
7.5.1.4).
  7.5.4.3  2 g granular anhydrous sodium sul-
fate (Section 7.2.1).
  7.5.4.4  10  g acid silica gel (Section 7.5.1.2).
  7.5.4.5  2 g granular anhydrous sodium sul-
fate.
  7.5.5 Florisil column.
  7.5.5.1  Florisil—60-100 mesh, Floridin Corp
(or equivalent). Soxhlet  extract in 500 g por-
tions for 24 hours.
  7.5.5.2  Insert a glass wool plug into the ta-
pered end of a graduated serological pipet
(Section 6.7.3.2).  Pack with  1.5  g (approx 2
mL) of Florisil topped with  approx 1 mL of
sodium  sulfate (Section 7.2.1)  and a  glass
wool plug.
  7.5.5.3  Activate in an oven at 130-150 °C for
a minimum of  24 hours and cool for 30 min-
utes. Use within 90 minutes of cooling.
  7.6  Reference    Matrices—Matrices   in
which the CDDs/CDFs and interfering com-
pounds are not  detected by this method.
  7.6.1 Reagent  water—Bottled water  pur-
chased  locally,  or  prepared  by  passage
through activated carbon.
  7.6.2 High-solids reference matrix—Play-
ground sand or  similar material. Prepared by
extraction with  methylene  chloride and/or
baking  at 450  °C  for a minimum of  four
hours.
  7.6.3 Paper reference  matrix—Glass-fiber
filter, Gelman  Type  A, or equivalent.  Cut
paper to  simulate the  surface area of  the
paper sample being tested.
  7.6.4 Tissue  reference  matrix—Corn  or
other vegetable oil. May be prepared by ex-
traction  with methylene chloride.
  7.6.5 Other matrices—This method may be
verified  on  any reference matrix  by  per-
forming the tests given in Section 9.2. Ideal-
ly,  the matrix should be free of the  CDDs/
CDFs, but in no case shall the background
level  of the  CDDs/CDFs in the reference ma-
trix exceed  three times the minimum levels
in Table 2.  If low background levels of  the
CDDs/CDFs  are present in the reference ma-
trix, the spike  level of  the analytes used in
Section 9.2 should be increased to provide a
spike-to-background ratio in the range of 1:1
to 5:1 (Reference 15).
  7.7  Standard Solutions—Purchased as so-
lutions  or  mixtures with certification to
their  purity,  concentration,  and  authen-
ticity, or prepared from materials of known
purity and composition. If the chemical pu-
rity is 98%  or  greater,  the  weight may be
used without correction to compute the con-
centration of the standard. When not being
used,  standards are stored in  the  dark at
room temperature in screw-capped vials with
fluoropolymer-lined caps. A  mark is placed
on  the vial  at  the level of the solution so
that solvent loss by evaporation can be de-
tected. If solvent loss has occurred, the solu-
tion should be replaced.
  7.8  Stock Solutions.
                                          245

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth.  1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  7.8.1  Preparation—Prepare  in nonane per
the steps below or purchase as dilute solu-
tions (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (OIL),
Woburn,  MA,  or  equivalent). Observe the
safety precautions in Section  5, and the rec-
ommendation in Section 5.1.2.
  7.8.2  Dissolve an  appropriate  amount of
assayed reference material in solvent. For
example,  weigh 1-2 mg of 2,3,7,8-TCDD to
three significant figures in a  10 mL ground-
glass-stoppered volumetric flask and  fill to
the mark with nonane. After the TCDD is
completely  dissolved,  transfer the  solution
to a clean 15 mL vial with fluoropolymer-
lined cap.
  7.8.3  Stock standard solutions  should be
checked for signs of degradation prior to the
preparation  of  calibration or performance
test standards. Reference standards that can
be used to determine the accuracy of calibra-
tion standards are  available  from  OIL and
may be available from other vendors.
  7.9  PAR Stock Solution
  7.9.1  All CDDs/CDFs—Using the solutions
in Section 7.8,  prepare the PAR stock solu-
tion to contain the CDDs/CDFs at the con-
centrations shown in Table 3. When diluted,
the solution will become the PAR  (Section
7.14).
  7.9.2  If only  2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF
are to be determined, prepare  the PAR stock
solution to contain these compounds only.
  7.10  Labeled-Compound Spiking Solution.
  7.10.1  All  CDDs/CDFs—From stock  solu-
tions, or from purchased mixtures, prepare
this solution to contain  the labeled com-
pounds  in  nonane  at  the   concentrations
shown  in Table 3. This solution is diluted
with acetone prior to use (Section 7.10.3).
  7.10.2  If  only  2,3,7,8-TCDD  and   2,3,7,8-
TCDF are to be determined, prepare the la-
beled-compound solution  to  contain  these
compounds  only.  This solution  is  diluted
with acetone prior to use (Section 7.10.3).
  7.10.3  Dilute a sufficient volume of the la-
beled compound solution  (Section  7.10.1 or
7.10.2) by a factor of 50 with acetone to pre-
pare a diluted spiking solution. Each sample
requires  1.0 mL of the diluted solution, but
no  more solution should  be  prepared than
can be used in one day.
  7.11  Cleanup   Standard—Prepare   37C14-
2,3,7,8-TCDD in nonane at  the concentration
shown  in Table 3. The cleanup standard is
added  to all extracts  prior  to  cleanup to
measure  the efficiency of  the cleanup proc-
ess.
  7.12  Internal Standard(s).
  7.12.1  All  CDDs/CDFs—Prepare  the inter-
nal standard solution to contain  13C12-1,2,3,4-
TCDD and 13C2-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD in nonane at
the concentration shown in Table 3.
  7.12.2  If  only  2,3,7,8-TCDD  and  2,3,7,8-
TCDF are to be determined, prepare the in-
ternal  standard  solution  to  contain  13Ci2-
1,2,3,4-TCDD only.
  7.13  Calibration  Standards (CS1  through
CS5)—Combine the solutions in Sections 7.9
through 7.12 to produce the five calibration
solutions shown in Table 4 in nonane. These
solutions  permit the relative response (la-
beled to native)  and response factor to be
measured as a function of concentration. The
CSS   standard  is  used  for   calibration
verification (VER). If only 2,3,7,8-TCDD and
2,3,7,8-TCDF are to be determined, combine
the  solutions  appropriate  to  these  com-
pounds.
  7.14  Precision and Recovery (PAR) Stand-
ard—Used for determination of initial (Sec-
tion 9.2) and ongoing (Section 15.5) precision
and  recovery. Dilute  10 |iL of the precision
and recovery standard (Section 7.9.1 or 7.9.2)
to 2.0 mL with acetone for each sample ma-
trix  for each sample batch. One mL each are
required for the  blank and OPR with each
matrix in each batch.
  7.15  GC Retention Time Window Defining
Solution and Isomer Specificity Test Stand-
ard—Used to define the beginning and ending
retention times for the dioxin and furan iso-
mers and  to demonstrate isomer specificity
of the GC columns employed  for determina-
tion of 2,3,7,8-TCDD  and 2,3,7,8-TCDF.  The
standard must contain the compounds listed
in Table 5 (CIL EDF-^006, or  equivalent), at
a minimum. It is not necessary to monitor
the  window-defining  compounds  if  only
2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF are to  be de-
termined. In this case, an isomer-specificity
test standard containing the most  closely
eluted isomers listed in Table 5 (CIL EDF-
4033, or equivalent) may be used.
  7.16  QC Check Sample—A QC Check Sam-
ple should be obtained from  a  source inde-
pendent of the calibration standards. Ideally,
this check sample would be a certified ref-
erence material containing the  CDDs/CDFs
in known concentrations in a sample matrix
similar to the matrix under test.
  7.17  Stability of Solutions—Standard so-
lutions used for quantitative  purposes (Sec-
tions 7.9 through 7.15) should be analyzed pe-
riodically, and should be assayed against ref-
erence standards  (Section 7.8.3) before fur-
ther use.

 3.0  Sample Collection, Preservation, Storage,
             and Holding Times

  8.1  Collect  samples in amber  glass con-
tainers  following conventional  sampling
practices  (Reference  16). Aqueous  samples
that flow freely are collected in refrigerated
bottles using  automatic  sampling  equip-
ment. Solid samples are collected as grab
samples using wide-mouth jars.
  8.2 Maintain aqueous samples in the dark
at 0-4 °C from the time of collection until re-
ceipt at the laboratory. If residual chlorine
is present in aqueous samples, add 80 mg so-
dium thiosulfate  per liter  of  water. EPA
                                          246

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
Methods 330.4 and 330.5 may be used to meas-
ure residual chlorine (Reference 17).  If sam-
ple pH is  greater than  9, adjust to pH 7-9
with sulfuric acid.
  Maintain solid, semi-solid, oily, and mixed-
phase samples in the dark at <4 °C from the
time of collection until receipt at the labora-
tory.
  Store aqueous samples in  the dark at 0-^1
°C. Store solid, semi-solid, oily, mixed-phase,
and tissue  samples in the dark at < -10 °C.
  8.3  Fish and Tissue Samples.
  8.3.1  Fish  may  be cleaned,  filleted, or
processed  in  other ways in the field, such
that the laboratory  may expect to  receive
whole fish, fish fillets,  or other tissues for
analysis.
  8.3.2  Fish collected in the  field should be
wrapped in  aluminum  foil,  and  must be
maintained at a temperature less than 4 °C
from  the time of collection until receipt at
the laboratory.
  8.3.3  Samples must be frozen upon receipt
at the laboratory and maintained in the dark
at <-10 °C until prepared. Maintain unused
sample in the dark at < -10 °C.
  8.4  Holding Times.
  8.4.1  There  are no  demonstrated  max-
imum holding times associated with CDDs/
CDFs in aqueous, solid, semi-solid,  tissues,
or other sample matrices. If stored in  the
dark at 0-4 °C and preserved  as given above
(if required), aqueous samples may be stored
for up to one year. Similarly,  if stored in the
dark  at <-10 °C, solid, semi-solid, multi-
phase, and tissue samples may be stored for
up to  one year.
  8.4.2  Store sample extracts in the dark at
< -10  °C until analyzed. If stored in the dark
at <-10 °C,  sample extracts  may be stored
for up to one year.

    9.0  Quality Assurance/Quality Control

  9.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality assur-
ance program (Reference 18).  The minimum
requirements of this program consist of an
initial  demonstration of laboratory capa-
bility, analysis of samples spiked with la-
beled  compounds to evaluata and document
data quality, and analysis of standards and
blanks  as  tests  of  continued performance.
Laboratory performance is compared to es-
tablished performance criteria to determine
if the results of analyses meet the perform-
ance characteristics of the method.
  If the method is to be applied to  sample
matrix  other than water (e.g., soils, filter
cake,  compost, tissue) the most appropriate
alternate   matrix  (Sections  7.6.2 through
7.6.5)  is substituted  for the  reagent water
matrix  (Section 7.6.1) in all  performance
tests.
  9.1.1   The analyst  shall make  an  initial
demonstration of the ability to generate  ac-
ceptable accuracy  and  precision with this
method. This ability is  established as de-
scribed in Section 9.2.
  9.1.2  In  recognition of advances that are
occurring  in analytical  technology,  and to
allow the  analyst to overcome sample  ma-
trix interferences, the analyst is permitted
certain options to improve separations or
lower the  costs of measurements. These op-
tions  include   alternate  extraction,  con-
centration, cleanup procedures, and changes
in columns and detectors.  Alternate deter-
minative   techniques, such  as the  substi-
tution  of  spectroscopic  or  immuno-assay
techniques, and changes that degrade meth-
od performance, are not allowed.  If an ana-
lytical  technique other than the techniques
specified in this method is used,  that tech-
nique must have a specificity equal to or bet-
ter than the specificity of the techniques in
this method for the analytes of interest.
  9.1.2.1  Bach time  a modification is made
to this method, the analyst is required to re-
peat the procedure in Section 9.2. If  the de-
tection limit of the  method will be affected
by the change, the laboratory is required to
demonstrate that the MDL (40 CFR Part 136,
Appendix B) is lower than one-third the reg-
ulatory compliance  level  or one-third  the
ML in this method, whichever is higher. If
calibration will be affected by the change,
the analyst must recalibrate the instrument
per Section 10.
  9.1.2.2  The laboratory is required to main-
tain records of  modifications made  to this
method. These records include the following,
at a minimum:
  9.1.2.2.1   The names, titles,  addresses,  and
telephone numbers of the analyst(s) who per-
formed the analyses and modification, and of
the quality control officer who witnessed and
will verify  the analyses and modifications.
  9.1.2.2.2   A listing  of  pollutant(s)  meas-
ured, by name and CAS Registry number.
  9.1.2.2.3   A narrative stating reason(s) for
the modifications.
  9.1.2.2.4   Results from  all quality  control
(QC) tests comparing the modified method to
this method, including:
  (a) Calibration (Section 10.5 through 10.7).
  (b) Calibration verification (Section 15.3).
  (c) Initial precision and recovery (Section
9.2).
  (d) Labeled compound  recovery (Section
9.3).
  (e) Analysis of blanks (Section 9.5).
  (f) Accuracy assessment (Section 9.4).
  9.1.2.2.5   Data  that  will  allow an inde-
pendent  reviewer  to  validate  each deter-
mination by tracing  the instrument  output
(peak height, area, or other  signal)  to  the
final result. These data are to include:
  (a) Sample numbers and other identifiers.
  (b) Extraction dates.
  (c) Analysis dates and times.
  (d) Analysis sequence/run chronology.
  (e) Sample weight or volume (Section 11).
                                          247
       203-160  D-9

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (f) Extract volume prior to each  cleanup
step (Section 13).
  (g) Extract volume after each cleanup step
(Section 13).
  (h) Final extract volume prior to injection
(Section 14).
  (i) Injection volume (Section 14.3).
  (j) Dilution data,  differentiating between
dilution of a sample or extract (Section 17.5).
  (k) Instrument and operating conditions.
  (1) Column  (dimensions, liquid phase, solid
support, film thickness, etc).
  (m) Operating  conditions  (temperatures,
temperature program, flow rates).
  (n)  Detector  (type,  operating conditions,
etc).
  (o)  Chromatograms,  printer  tapes,  and
other recordings of raw data.
  (p) Quantitation reports, data system out-
puts, and  other data to link the raw data to
the results reported.
  9.1.3 Analyses  of method  blanks are re-
quired to demonstrate freedom from  con-
tamination (Section 4.3). The procedures and
criteria for analysis of a method  blank are
described in Sections 9.5 and 15.6.
  9.1.4 The laboratory shall spike all sam-
ples with labeled  compounds  to monitor
method performance. This test is described
in Section 9.3. When results of these spikes
indicate  atypical method performance for
samples, the samples are diluted to bring
method performance within acceptable lim-
its. Procedures for dilution are given in Sec-
tion 17.5.
  9.1.5 The laboratory shall, on an  ongoing
basis,   demonstrate   through  calibration
verification and the analysis of the  ongoing
precision and recovery aliquot that the ana-
lytical system is in control. These proce-
dures are  described in Sections 15.1  through
15.5.
  9.1.6 The  laboratory   shall   maintain
records to define the quality of data that is
generated. Development of accuracy state-
ments is described in Section 9.4.
  9.2  Initial Precision and Recovery (IPR)—•
To establish  the  ability to generate  accept-
able  precision and  recovery,  the  analyst
shall perform the following operations.
  9.2.1 For low solids (aqueous) samples, ex-
tract,  concentrate,  and  analyze  four 1 L
aliquots of reagent water spiked with the di-
luted  labeled  compound  spiking  solution
(Section 7.10.3) and the precision and recov-
ery standard (Section 7.14) according to the
procedures in Sections 11 through 18. For an
alternative sample matrix,  four aliquots of
the alternative reference matrix (Section 7.6)
are used.  All sample processing steps that
are to be used for processing samples, includ-
ing preparation (Section 11), extraction (Sec-
tion 12), and cleanup (Section 13), shall be in-
cluded in this test.
  9.2.2 Using results of the set of four anal-
yses, compute the average concentration (X)
of the extracts in ng/mL and the standard de-
viation of the concentration (s) in ng/mL for
each  compound,  by  isotope  dilution  for
CDDs/CDFs with a labeled analog, and by in-
ternal standard for 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD, OCDF,
and the labeled compounds.
  9.2.3 For each CDD/CDF and labeled com-
pound,  compare  s  and X  with  the  cor-
responding limits for initial precision and re-
covery in Table 6.  If only 2,3,7,8-TCDD and
2,3,7,8-TCDF are to be determined, compare s
and X with the corresponding limits for ini-
tial precision and recovery in Table 6a. If s
and X for all compounds meet the acceptance
criteria,  system performance is acceptable
and  analysis  of  blanks and samples  may
begin. If, however,  any individual s exceeds
the precision limit or any individual X falls
outside the range  for accuracy, system per-
formance is unacceptable for that compound.
Correct the problem and repeat the test (Sec-
tion 9.2).
  9.3  The laboratory shall spike all samples
with  the diluted labeled compound spiking
solution  (Section  7.10.3) to  assess method
performance on the sample  matrix.
  9.3.1 Analyze  each  sample  according  to
the procedures in Sections 11 through 18.
  9.3.2 Compute the percent  recovery of the
labeled compounds and the cleanup standard
using the internal standard method (Section
17.2).
  9.3.3 The  recovery of each  labeled com-
pound must be within the  limits in Table 7
when all 2,3,7,8-substituted CDDs/CDFs are
determined, and within the limits in Table
7a when only 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF
are determined.  If the recovery of  any com-
pound falls outside of these  limits, method
performance  is unacceptable for that com-
pound in that sample. To overcome such dif-
ficulties, water  samples  are   diluted and
smaller amounts of soils, sludges, sediments,
and other matrices are reanalyzed per Sec-
tion 18.4.
  9.4  Recovery  of labeled compounds from
samples  should  be  assessed  and records
should be maintained.
  9.4.1 After the analysis of five samples of
a  given  matrix  type (water,  soil, sludge,
pulp,  etc.) for which the labeled compounds
pass the  tests in Section 9.3, compute the av-
erage percent recovery (R) and the standard
deviation of  the percent recovery (SR) for
the labeled compounds only.  Express the as-
sessment as a percent recovery interval from
R-2SR to R=2SR for each matrix. For exam-
ple, if R  = 90% and  SR = 10% for five analyses
of pulp, the recovery interval is expressed as
70-110%.
  9.4.2 Update the accuracy assessment for
each  labeled  compound in  each matrix on a
regular basis (e.g.,  after each 5-10 new meas-
urements).
  9.5  Method   Blanks—Reference  matrix
method blanks are analyzed  to demonstrate
freedom  from contamination (Section 4.3).
                                          248

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
  9.5.1  Prepare, extract,  clean up, and con-
centrate a method blank with each sample
batch (samples of the same matrix started
through the extraction process on the same
12-hour shift,  to a maximum of 20 samples).
The matrix for the method blank shall be
similar to sample ma-trix for the batch, e.g.,
a  1  L reagent water  blank (Section 7.6.1),
high-solids reference matrix blank (Section
7.6.2), paper matrix blank (Section 7.6.3); tis-
sue blank (Section 7.6.4)  or alternative  ref-
erence matrix blank (Section 7.6.5). Analyze
the blank immediately after analysis of the
OPR  (Section 15.5) to demonstrate freedom
from contamination.
  9.5.2  If any 2,3,7,8-substituted  CDD/CDP
(Table 1) is found  in  the blank  at  greater
than  the minimum level (Table  2) or one-
third  the  regulatory   compliance  level,
whichever is  greater;  or  if any  potentially
interfering compound is found in the blank
at  the minimum  level  for  each  level of
chlorination given in Table 2 (assuming a re-
sponse factor  of 1 relative to the  13Ci2-l,2,3,4-
TCDD internal standard for compounds not
listed in Table 1), analysis of samples is halt-
ed until the blank associated with the sam-
ple batch shows no evidence  of  contamina-
tion at this level. All samples must be asso-
ciated  with  an  uncontaminated  method
blank before  the results  for  those samples
may be reported for regulatory  compliance
purposes.
  9.6  QC Check  Sample—Analyze the  QC
Check Sample (Section 7.16) periodically to
assure the accuracy of calibration standards
and the overall reliability of the analytical
process.  It is  suggested that  the QC Check
Sample be analyzed at least quarterly.
  9.7  The specifications  contained in this
method can be met if the apparatus used is
calibrated properly and then maintained in a
calibrated state. The standards used for cali-
bration (Section 10), calibration verification
(Section 15.3), and for initial (Section  9.2)
and ongoing (Section 15.5) precision and re-
covery should be identical, so that the most
precise results will be obtained. A GC/MS in-
strument will provide the most reproducible
results, if dedicated to the  settings and condi-
tions required for the analyses of CDDs/CDFs
by this method.
  9.8  Depending  on  specific  program  re-
quirements,  field replicates may be collected
to determine  the precision  of the sampling
technique, and spiked samples may be re-
quired to determine the accuracy  of  the
analysis when the internal standard method
is used.

              10.0  Calibration

  10.1  Establish  the  operating   conditions
necessary to meet  the minimum retention
times for the  internal standards in Section
10.2.4 and the relative retention times for the
CDDs/CDFs in Table 2.
  10.1.1  Suggested GC operating  conditions:
Injector temperature: 270 °C
Interface temperature: 290 °C
Initial temperature: 200 °C
Initial time: Two minutes
Temperature program:
200-220 °C, at 5 °C/minute
220 °C for 16 minutes
220-235 °C, at 5 °C/minute
235 °C for seven minutes
235-330 °C, at 5 °C/minute
  NOTE: All portions of the column that con-
nect the GC to the ion source shall remain at
or above the interface temperature specified
above during analysis to preclude condensa-
tion of less volatile compounds.

  Optimize GC conditions for compound sep-
aration and sensitivity. Once optimized, the
same GC  conditions  must  be  used for the
analysis of all standards, blanks, IPR and
OPR aliquots, and samples.
  10.1.2  Mass  spectrometer  (MS)  resolu-
tion—Obtain a selected ion current profile
(SICP) of each analyte in Table 3 at the two
exact m/z's specified in Table 8 and at >10,000
resolving  power  by injecting  an authentic
standard of the CDDs/CDFs either singly or
as part  of a mixture in which there is no in-
terference  between closely eluted compo-
nents.
  10.1.2.1 The analysis time for CDDs/CDFs
may exceed the long-term mass stability of
the mass spectrometer. Because the instru-
ment is  operated in  the high-resolution
mode, mass drifts of  a few ppm (e.g., 5 ppm
in mass) can have serious adverse effects on
instrument performance. Therefore, a mass-
drift correction is mandatory  and  a lock-
mass m/z from  PFK is used for drift correc-
tion. The lock-mass m/z is dependent on the
exact   m/z's   monitored   within   each
descriptor, as shown in Table 8. The level of
PFK metered into the HRMS during analyses
should be adjusted  so that the amplitude of
the most intense selected lock-mass m/z sig-
nal (regardless  of  the descriptor number)
does not exceed 10% of the  full-scale deflec-
tion for a given set of detector parameters.
Under those  conditions, sensitivity  changes
that might occur during the analysis can be
more effectively monitored.
  NOTE: Excessive  PFK (or any  other ref-
erence substance) may cause noise problems
and contamination  of the ion source necessi-
tating  increased  frequency  of source clean-
ing.

  10.1.2.2 If the HRMS has the capability to
monitor resolution  during the analysis, it is
acceptable  to terminate the analysis when
the resolution falls below 10,000 to save rea-
nalysis time.
  10.1.2.3 Using a PFK molecular leak, tune
the instrument  to  meet  the  minimum re-
quired resolving power of 10,000 (10% valley)
at m/z 304.9824 (PFK)  or any other reference
signal close to m/z 304 (from TCDF). For each
                                         249

-------
PI. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
descriptor (Table 8), monitor and record the
resolution and exact m/z's  of three to five
reference peaks covering  the mass range of
the descriptor. The resolution must be great-
er than or equal to 10,000, and the deviation
between the exact m/z and the theoretical m/
z (Table 8) for each  exact m/z monitored
must be less than 5 ppm.
  10.2  Ion Abundance Ratios, Minimum Lev-
els, Signal-to-Noise Ratios, and Absolute Re-
tention Times—Choose an injection volume
of either 1 nL or 2 |iL, consistent with the ca-
pability of the HRGC/HRMS instrument. In-
ject a 1 nL or 2 jiL aliquot of the CS1 calibra-
tion solution (Table 4) using the GC condi-
tions from Section 10.1.1. If only 2,3,7,8-TCDD
and 2,3,7,8-TCDF are to be  determined, the
operating  conditions  and  specifications
below apply to analysis of those compounds
only.
  10.2.1  Measure the  SICP areas  for  each
analyte, and compute the ion abundance ra-
tios at the exact m/z's specified in Table 8.
Compare the  computed  ratio  to  the  theo-
retical ratio given in Table 9.
  10.2.1.1 The exact m/z's to be monitored in
each descriptor are shown in Table 8. Each
group  or descriptor shall be monitored in
succession  as  a function of GC  retention
time to ensure  that all  CDDs/CDFs are de-
tected. Additional m/z's may be monitored in
each descriptor, and the m/z's may be divided
among more than the  five descriptors  listed
in Table 8,  provided that the laboratory is
able to monitor the m/z's of all the CDDs/
CDFs that may elute from the GC in a given
retention-time window. If only  2,3,7,8-TCDD
and  2,3,7,8-TCDF are to  be  determined, the
descriptors may be modified to  include only
the exact m/z's for the tetra-and penta-iso-
mers, the diphenyl ethers,  and the lock m/
z's.
  10.2.1.2 The  mass spectrometer  shall  be
operated in a  mass-drift correction mode,
using  perfluorokerosene  (PFK) to provide
lock m/z's. The lock-mass for each group of
m/z's is shown in Table  8.  Each lock mass
shall be monitored and  shall  not vary  by
more than ±20% throughout its respective re-
tention time window. Variations of the lock
mass by more than 20% indicate the presence
of coeluting interferences that  may signifi-
cantly reduce  the sensitivity  of the mass
spectrometer. Reinjection of another aliquot
of the sample  extract will not resolve the
problem. Additional cleanup of the extract
may be required to remove the interferences.
  10.2.2 All  CDDs/CDFs  and labeled com-
pounds in the CS1 standard shall be within
the QC limits in Table 9 for their respective
ion abundance ratios; otherwise,  the mass
spectrometer shall be adjusted and this test
repeated until the m/z ratios fall within the
limits specified. If the adjustment alters the
resolution of the mass spectrometer, resolu-
tion shall be verified (Section 10.1.2) prior to
repeat of the test.
  10.2.3  Verify that the HRGC/HRMS instru-
ment meets the minimum levels in Table 2.
The  peaks representing the CDDs/CDFs  and
labeled  compounds in  the CS1  calibration
standard must have signal-to-noise ratios (S/
N) greater than or equal  to 10.0. Otherwise,
the mass spectrometer shall be adjusted  and
this  test repeated until the minimum levels
in Table 2 are met.
  10.2.4  The absolute retention time of 13Ciz-
1,2,3,4-TCDD (Section 7.12) shall exceed  25.0
minutes on the DB-5 column, and the reten-
tion time of 13Ci2-l,2,3,4-TCDD shall exceed
15.0  minutes on the DB-225 column; other-
wise, the  GC temperature program shall be
adjusted and  this test repeated until  the
above-stated minimum retention time  cri-
teria are met.
2010.3 Retention-Time    Windows—Analyze
the window defining mixtures (Section 7.15)
using the optimized temperature program in
Section 10.1. Table 5 gives the elution order
(first/last)   of  the  window-defining  com-
pounds.  If 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF only
are to be analyzed, this test is not required.
  10.4 Isomer Specificity.
  10.4.1  Analyze the isomer specificity  test
standards (Section 7.15) using the procedure
in Section 14  and the optimized conditions
for sample analysis (Section 10.1.1).
  10.4.2  Compute the percent valley between
the GC  peaks that elute most closely to the
2,3,7,8-TCDD and TCDF isomers, on their re-
spective columns, per Figures 6 and 7.
  10.4.3  Verify that the height of the valley
between the most closely  eluted isomers and
the  2,3,7,8-substituted isomers is less than
25%  (computed as 100 x/y in Figures 6 and 7).
If the valley exceeds 25%, adjust the analyt-
ical  conditions and repeat the test or replace
the  GC  column and  recalibrate (Sections
10.1.2 through 10.7).
  10.5 Calibration by Isotope Dilution—Iso-
tope dilution  calibration  is used for the 15
2,3,7,8-substituted CDDs/CDFs for which la-
beled compounds are added to samples prior
to extraction.  The reference  compound for
each CDD/CDF compound is shown in Table
2.
  10.5.1  A  calibration  curve  encompassing
the concentration range is prepared for each
compound to be determined. The relative re-
sponse (RR) (labeled to native) vs. concentra-
tion in  standard solutions is plotted or com-
puted using a linear regression. Relative re-
sponse is determined according to the proce-
dures  described  below.   Five   calibration
points are employed.
  10.5.2  The response  of each CDD/CDF rel-
ative to  its labeled analog is  determined
using the area responses of both the  primary
and  secondary  exact m/z's specified in Table
8, for each calibration standard, as follows:
                                          250

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                          Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
              = (Aln+A2n)C.

                (Al,+A21)Cn
where:
Aln and A2n = The areas of the primary and
  secondary m/z's for the CDD/CDF.
Ali and A2, = The areas of the primary and
  secondary m/z's for the labeled compound.
Ci = The concentration of the labeled  com-
  pound in the  calibration standard (Table
  4).
Cn = The  concentration of the native  com-
  pound in the  calibration standard (Table
  4).
  10.5.3 To calibrate the analytical system
by isotope dilution, inject a volume of cali-
bration standards CS1 through CSS (Section
7.13 and Table 4) identical to the volume cho-
sen in Section 10.2,  using1 the procedure in
Section 14 and the  conditions  in  Section
10.1.1 and Table 2. Compute the relative re-
sponse (RR) at each concentration.
  10.5.4 Linearity — If  the relative response
for any compound is constant (less than 20%
coefficient of variation) over the five-point
calibration range, an  averaged relative re-
sponse may be used for that compound; oth-
erwise, the complete  calibration curve for
that compound shall be used over the  five-
point calibration range.
  10.6  Calibration by  Internal  Standard—
The internal standard method is applied to
determination of 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD (Section
17.1.2), OCDF (Section  17.1.1), the non 2,3,7,8-
substituted compounds, and  to  the deter-
mination    of  labeled   compounds   for
intralaboratory  statistics  (Sections 9.4 and
15.5.4).
  10.6.1 Response  factors — Calibration  re-
quires the  determination  of response factors
(RF) defined by the following equation:
          RF =
(A1S+A2S)C1S

(Alis+A2is)Cs
where:
Als and A2S = The areas of the primary and
  secondary m/z's for the CDD/CDF.
A11S and A2,, = The areas of the primary and
  secondary m/z's for the internal standard.
C,s = The concentration of the internal stand-
  ard (Table 4).
Cs = The concentration of the compound in
  the calibration standard (Table 4).

  NOTE: There is only one m/z for 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-
TCDD. See Table 8.

  10.6.2  To calibrate the analytical system
by internal standard, inject 1.0 nL or 2.0 (iL
of calibration  standards CS1 through  085
(Section 7.13 and Table  4) using the proce-
dure in Section 14 and the conditions in Sec-
tion 10.1.1 and Table 2. Compute the response
factor (RF) at each concentration.
  10.6.3  Linearity—If  the  response  factor
(RF) for any compound is constant (less than
35%  coefficient of variation)  over the  five-
point calibration range,  an  averaged re-
sponse  factor may be used for that  com-
pound;  otherwise, the complete  calibration
curve for that compound shall be used over
the five-point range.
  10.7  Combined Calibration—By using cali-
bration solutions (Section 7.13 and Table 4)
containing the CDDs/CDFs and labeled  com-
pounds  and the internal standards, a single
set of analyses can be used to produce cali-
bration curves for the isotope dilution and
internal standard methods. These curves are
verified each shift (Section 15.3) by analyzing
the calibration verification standard (VER,
Table 4). Recalibration is required if any of
the calibration verification criteria (Section
15.3) cannot be met.
  10.8  Data Storage—MS data shall be col-
lected, recorded, and stored.
  10.8.1  Data acquisition—The  signal  at
each exact m/z shall be collected repetitively
throughout the monitoring period and stored
on a mass storage device.
  10.8.2  Response factors  and  multipoint
calibrations—The data system shall be used
to record and maintain lists of response fac-
tors (response ratios for isotope dilution) and
multipoint calibration curves. Computations
of relative standard deviation (coefficient of
variation) shall  be used to test  calibration
linearity. Statistics on initial performance
(Section 9.2) and ongoing performance (Sec-
tion 15.5) should be   computed  and  main-
tained,  either on  the  instrument data sys-
tem, or  on a separate computer system.

          11.0 Sample Preparation
  11.1  Sample preparation involves  modi-
fying the physical form of the sample so that
the CDDs/CDFs can be extracted efficiently.
In general, the samples must be in a liquid
form or in the form of finely divided solids in
order for efficient extraction  to take place.
Table 10 lists the phases and suggested quan-
tities for extraction of various sample  mat-
rices.
  For samples known  or expected to contain
high levels  of the CDDs/CDFs, the smallest
sample size representative of the entire  sam-
ple should be used (see Section 17.5).
  For all  samples,  the blank and IPR/OPR
aliquots must be processed  through the same
steps as the sample to check for contamina-
tion and losses in the preparation processes.
  11.1.1  For samples that contain particles,
percent solids and particle size are  deter-
mined using the procedures in Sections 11.2
and 11.3, respectively.
  11.1.2  Aqueous  samples—Because  CDDs/
CDFs may be bound to suspended particles,
the preparation  of aqueous samples  is de-
pendent on the solids  content  of the sample.
                                         251

-------
Pt.  136, App.A, Meth. 1613
                             40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
  11.1.2.1  Aqueous  samples  visibly  absent
particles are prepared per Section 11.4 and
extracted directly using the  separatory fun-
nel or SPE techniques  in Sections  12.1 or
12.2, respectively.
  11.1.2.2  Aqueous  samples containing visi-
ble particles and containing one percent sus-
pended solids or less are prepared using the
procedure in Section 11.4. After preparation,
the sample is  extracted directly using the
SPE technique  in 12.2 or filtered per Section
11.4.3. After filtration, the particles and fil-
ter are extracted using the SDS procedure in
Section 12.3  and  the filtrate is extracted
using the  separatory funnel  procedure in
Section 12.1.
  11.1.2.3  For  aqueous  samples containing
greater than one percent solids, a sample ali-
quot sufficient  to provide 10 g of dry solids is
used, as described in Section 11.5.
  11.1.3  Solid  samples  are  prepared using
the procedure  described in Section 11.5 fol-
lowed by  extraction  via the SDS procedure
in Section 12.3.
  11.1.4  Multiphase  samples—The phase(s)
containing the  CDDs/CDFs is separated from
the non-CDD/CDF phase using pressure fil-
                  tration and  centrifugation,  as described in
                  Section 11.6. The CDDs/CDFs will be in the
                  organic  phase in  a multiphase  sample in
                  which an organic phase exists.
                    11.1.5  Procedures for grinding, homogreni-
                  zation,   and  blending of various  sample
                  phases are given in Section 11.7.
                    11.1.6  Tissue samples—Preparation proce-
                  dures for fish and other tissues are given in
                  Section 11.8.
                    11.2  Determination of  Percent Suspended
                  Solids.

                    NOTE: This aliquot is used for determining
                  the solids content of the  sample,  not for de-
                  termination of CDDs/CDFs.

                    11.2.1  Aqueous  liquids and multi-phase
                  samples  consisting of mainly an aqueous
                  phase.
                    11.2.1.1  Dessicate and weigh a GF/D filter
                  (Section 6.5.3) to three significant figures.
                    11.2.1.2  Filter  10.0±0.02  mL  of  well-mixed
                  sample through the filter.
                    11.2.1.3  Dry the filter  a minimum  of 12
                  hours at 110±5 °C and cool in a dessicator.
                    11.2.1.4  Calculate  percent  solids  as  fol-
                  lows:
             _ weight of sample aliquot after drying (g) - weight of filter (g)
      ' solids =	x 100
  11.2.2  Non-aqueous  liquids,  solids, semi-
solid  samples, and multi-phase samples in
which the main phase is not aqueous; but not
tissues.
  11.2.2.1  Weigh  5-10  g  of  sample to three
significant figures in a tared beaker.
                    11.2.2.2  Dry a minimum  of 12 hours  at
                   110±5 °C, and cool in a dessicator.
                    11.2.2.3  Calculate percent  solids  as fol-
                   lows:
                % solids =
 weight of sample aliquot after drying
weight of sample aliquot before drying
xlOO
  11.3  Determination of Particle Size.
  11.3.1  Spread the dried sample from Sec-
tion 11.2.2.2 on a piece of filter paper or alu-
minum foil in a fume hood or glove box.
  11.3.2  Estimate  the size of the particles in
the sample. If the size of the largest particles
is greater than 1 mm, the particle size must
be reduced to 1 mm  or less prior to extrac-
tion using the procedures in Section  11.7.
  11.4  Preparation of Aqueous Samples Con-
taining 1% Suspended Solids or Less.
  11.4.1  Aqueous samples visibly absent par-
ticles are prepared per the procedure below
and  extracted directly using the  separatory
funnel or SPE techniques in Sections 12.1 or
12.2,  respectively.  Aqueous  samples con-
                  taining visible particles and one percent sus-
                  pended solids or less are prepared using the
                  procedure  below and extracted using either
                  the SPE technique in Section 12.2 or further
                  prepared  using the filtration  procedure in
                  Section 11.4.3. The filtration procedure is fol-
                  lowed by  SDS  extraction of the filter  and
                  particles (Section 12.3) and separatory funnel
                  extraction of the filtrate (Section 12.1). The
                  SPE procedure is followed by SDS extraction
                  of the filter and disk.
                    11.4.2 Preparation  of  sample   and  QC
                  aliquots.
                    11.4.2.1  Mark  the original  level  of  the
                  sample on the  sample bottle for reference.
                  Weigh the sample plus bottle to ± 1.
                                          252

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth.  1613
  11.4.2.2  Spike  1.0 mL  of the diluted la-
beled-compound  spiking  solution  (Section
7.10.3) into the sample bottle. Cap the bottle
and  mix the  sample  by  careful  shaking.
Allow  the sample to equilibrate for one to
two hours, with occasional shaking.
  11.4.2.3  For each sample or sample batch
(to a maximum of 20 samples) to be extracted
during the same 12-hour shift, place two 1.0 L
aliquots of reagent water  in clean sample
bottles or flasks.
  11.4.2.4  Spike  1.0 mL,  of the diluted la-
beled-compound  spiking  solution  (Section
7.10.3) into both reagent water aliquots. One
of these aliquots will  serve  as the method
blank.
  11.4.2.5  Spike 1.0 mL of the PAR standard
(Section  7.14)  into  the  remaining reagent
water aliquot. This aliquot will serve as the
OPB (Section 15.5).
  11.4.2.6  If SPE is to  be used, add 5 mL of
methanol to the sample,  cap and shake the
sample to mix  thoroughly, and proceed to
Section 12.2 for extraction. If SPE is  not to
be used, and the sample is visibly absent par-
ticles,  proceed to Section 12.1 for extraction.
If SPE is not to be used and the sample con-
tains visible particles, proceed to  the fol-
lowing section for filtration of particles.
  11.4.3   Filtration of particles.
  11.4.3.1  Assemble  a Buchner funnel (Sec-
tion 6.5.5) on top of a clean filtration flask.
Apply vacuum to the flask, and pour the en-
tire contents of the sample bottle through a
glass-fiber  filter  (Section  6.5.6)  in  the
Buchner funnel, swirling the sample remain-
ing in the bottle to suspend any particles.
  11.4.3.2  Rinse the sample bottle twice with
approximately 5  mL  portions of  reagent
water  to transfer any remaining particles
onto the filter.
  11.4.3.3  Rinse any particles off the sides of
the Buchner funnel with  small  quantities of
reagent water.
  11.4.3.4  Weigh the empty sample bottle to
±1 g. Determine the weight of the sample by
difference. Save the bottle for further use.
  11.4.3.5  Extract  the filtrate using  the
separatory funnel procedure in Section 12.1.
  11.4.3.6  Extract the filter  containing the
particles using the SDS procedure in Section
12.3.
  11.5  Preparation of  Samples Containing
Greater Than 1% Solids.
  11.5.1  Weigh a well-mixed aliquot of each
sample (of the same matrix type) sufficient
to provide 10 g of dry solids (based on the sol-
ids determination  in  Section  11.2) into a
clean beaker or glass jar.
  11.5.2   Spike 1.0 mL of  the  diluted labeled
compound spiking solution (Section  7.10.3)
into the sample.
  11.5.3  For each sample or sample batch (to
a maximum  of 20 samples) to  be extracted
during the same 12-hour shift, weigh two 10 g
aliquots  of the appropriate  reference matrix
(Section 7.6) into clean beakers  or glass jars.
  11.5.4 Spike 1.0 mL of the diluted labeled
compound spiking solution (Section 7.10.3)
into each reference matrix aliquot. One ali-
quot will serve as the method blank. Spike
1.0  mL of the PAR standard (Section 7.14)
into the other reference matrix aliquot. This
aliquot will serve as the OPR (Section 15.5).
  11.5.5 Stir or tumble  and equilibrate the
aliquots for one to two hours.
  11.5.6 Decant excess water. If necessary to
remove water, filter the sample through a
glass-fiber filter and discard the aqueous liq-
uid.
  11.5.7 If particles >lmm are present in the
sample (as determined in  Section  11.3.2),
spread the sample on clean aluminum foil in
a hood. After  the sample is dry,  grind to re-
duce the particle size (Section 11.7).
  11.5.8 Extract the sample and  QC aliquots
using the SDS procedure in Section 12.3.
  11.6  Multiphase Samples.
  11.6.1 Using the percent solids determined
in Section 11.2.1 or 11.2.2, determine the vol-
ume of sample that  will provide 10 g of sol-
ids, up to 1 L of sample.
  11.6.2 Pressure filter the amount of sam-
ple  determined in  Section 11.6.1  through
Whatman GF/D glass-fiber filter paper (Sec-
tion 6.5.3). Pressure filter the blank and OPR
aliquots through GF/D papers also.  If nec-
essary to separate the phases and/or settle
the solids, centrifuge these aliquots prior to
filtration.
  11.6.3 Discard   any  aqueous   phase  (if
present).  Remove any  non-aqueous  liquid
present and reserve the maximum amount
filtered from the sample  (Section 11.6.1) or 10
g,  whichever  is less, for combination with
the solid phase (Section 12.3.5).
  11.6.4 If particles >lmm are present in the
sample (as determined in Section 11.3.2) and
the sample is  capable of being dried,  spread
the sample and QC aliquots on clean alu-
minum foil in a hood. After the aliquots are
dry or if the sample cannot be dried,  reduce
the particle size using the procedures in Sec-
tion 11.7  and  extract  the  reduced particles
using the SDS procedure in Section 12.3. If
particles  >lmm are not present,  extract the
particles  and  filter  in the sample and  QC
aliquots directly using the SDS procedure in
Section 12.3.
  11.7  Sample grinding, homogenization, or
blending—Samples with particle  sizes great-
er than 1 mm (as  determined  in Section
11.3.2)  are subjected to grinding, homogeni-
zation, or blending. The method of reducing
particle size to less than 1 mm is matrix-de-
pendent. In general, hard particles can be re-
duced by  grinding with a mortar and pestle.
Softer particles can be reduced by grinding
in a Wiley mill or meat grinder,  by homog-
enization, or in a blender.
  11.7.1  Each  size-reducing preparation pro-
cedure on each matrix shall be  verified by
running the tests in Section 9.2 before the
procedure is employed routinely.
                                          253

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  11.7.2  The grinding, homogenization,  or
blending procedures shall be carried out in a
glove box or fume hood to prevent particles
from contaminating: the work environment.
  11.7.3  Grinding—Certain papers and pulps,
slurries, and amorphous solids can be ground
in a Wiley mill or heavy  duty meat grinder.
In some cases, reducing the temperature of
the sample to freezing or  to dry ice or liquid
nitrogen temperatures  can aid in the grind-
ing process. Grind the  sample aliquots from
Section 11.5.7 or 11.6.4 in a clean grinder.  Do
not allow the sample temperature to exceed
50 °C. Grind the blank  and reference matrix
aliquots using a clean grinder.
  11.7.4  Homogenization  or blending—Par-
ticles that are not ground effectively, or par-
ticles greater than 1 mm  in size after grind-
ing, can often be  reduced  in  size  by high
speed homogenization  or blending.  Homog-
enize and/or blend the particles or filter from
Section 11.5.7 or 11.6.4 for the sample, blank,
and OPR aliquots.
  11.7.5  Extract the aliquots using the SDS
procedure in Section 12.3.
  11.8  Fish  and  Other  Tissues—Prior  to
processing tissue samples, the laboratory
must determine the exact tissue to be ana-
lyzed. Common requests for analysis of fish
tissue  include whole  fish—skin  on,  whole
fish—skin   removed,   edible   fish   fillets
(filleted in the field  or by the laboratory),
specific organs, and other portions. Once the
appropriate tissue has  been determined, the
sample must be homogenized.
  11.8.1  Homogenization.
  11.8.1.1  Samples  are homogenized while
still frozen,  where practical.  If the labora-
tory must dissect the  whole fish to obtain
the appropriate tissue  for analysis, the un-
used tissues may  be rapidly  refrozen and
stored in a clean glass jar for subsequent use.
  11.8.1.2  Each analysis requires 10  g of tis-
sue (wet weight).  Therefore, the laboratory
should homogenize at least 20 g of tissue to
allow for re-extraction  of a second aliquot of
the same homogenized  sample, if re-analysis
is required. When whole fish analysis is nec-
essary, the entire fish is homogenized.
  11.8.1.3  Homogenize the sample in a tissue
homogenizer  (Section  6.3.3) or grind in a
meat grinder (Section  6.3.4). Cut tissue too
large to feed into  the grinder  into smaller
pieces.  To assure homogeneity, grind  three
times.
  11.8.1.4  Transfer approximately 10 g (wet
weight) of homogenized  tissue  to  a clean,
tared, 400-500 mL beaker. For  the alternate
HC1 digestion/extraction,  transfer the tissue
to a clean, tared 500-600 mL wide-mouth bot-
tle. Record the weight  to the nearest 10 mg.
  11.8.1.5  Transfer the remaining   homog-
enized  tissue  to  a  clean   jar  with  a
fluoropolymer-lined lid.  Seal   the  jar and
store the tissue at <-10 °C. Return any tis-
sue that was not homogenized to its original
container and store at <-10 °C.
  11.8.2  QC aliquots.
  11.8.2.1  Prepare a method blank by adding
approximately 10 g of the oily liquid ref-
erence matrix (Section 7.6.4) to a 400-500 mL
beaker. For the  alternate HC1 digestion/ex-
traction, add the reference matrix to a 500-
600  mL  wide-mouth  bottle.  Record  the
weight to the nearest 10 mg.
  11.8.2.2  Prepare a precision and recovery
aliquot by adding approximately 10 g of the
oily liquid reference matrix (Section 7.6.4) to
a separate 400--500 mL  beaker  or wide-mouth
bottle,  depending on  the  extraction  proce-
dure to be used. Record  the  weight to the
nearest 10 mg. If the initial precision and re-
covery  test is  to be performed,  use four
aliquots; if the ongoing precision and recov-
ery test is to be performed, use a single ali-
quot.
  11.8.3  Spiking
  11.8.3.1  Spike 1.0 mL of the labeled com-
pound spiking solution (Section 7.10.3) into
the sample, blank, and OPR aliquot.
  11.8.3.2  Spike 1.0 mL of the PAR standard
(Section 7.14) into the OPR aliquot.
  11.8.4  Extract  the aliquots  using the pro-
cedures in Section 12.4.

      72.0  Extraction and Concentration

  Extraction procedures include separatory
funnel (Section 12.1) and solid phase (Section
12.2) for aqueous liquids; Soxhlet/Dean-Stark
(Section 12.3)  for  solids,  filters,  and SPE
disks; and Soxhlet extraction  (Section 12.4.1)
and HC1 digestion (Section 12.4.2) for tissues.
Acid/base back-extraction (Section  12.5)  is
used for initial cleanup of extracts.
  Macro-concentration procedures   include
rotary evaporation (Section 12.6.1), heating
mantle (Section 12.6.2), and Kuderna-Danish
(K-D)  evaporation (Section  12.6.3). Micro-
concentration uses nitrogen blowdown (Sec-
tion 12.7).
  12.1  Separatory  funnel  extraction  of fil-
trates and of aqueous samples visibly absent
particles.
  12.1.1  Pour  the  spiked sample  (Section
11.4.2.2) or filtrate (Section 11.4.3.5) into a 2 L
separatory funnel. Rinse  the  bottle or flask
twice with 5 mL of reagent  water and add
these rinses to the separatory  funnel.
  12.1.2  Add 60 mL methylene chloride to
the  empty sample bottle (Section 12.1.1),
seal, and shake 60 seconds to  rinse the inner
surface.  Transfer the  solvent to the  sepa-
ratory  funnel, and extract the sample by
shaking the funnel for  two  minutes with
periodic venting. Allow the organic layer to
separate from the aqueous phase for a min-
imum of  10 minutes.  If an emulsion forms
and is more than one-third the volume of the
solvent layer,  employ mechanical techniques
to complete the phase separation (see note
below). Drain the methylene chloride extract
                                          254

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth.  1613
through a  solvent-rinsed glass funnel  ap-
proximately one-half full  of granular anhy-
drous  sodium sulfate  (Section 7.2.1)  sup-
ported on clean glass-fiber paper into a sol-
vent-rinsed  concentration device  (Section
12.6).
  NOTE:  If an emulsion forms,  the  analyst
must employ mechanical techniques  to com-
plete the  phase separation.  The  optimum
technique depends upon the sample, but may
include  stirring,  filtration  through  glass
wool, use  of phase separation  paper,  cen-
trifug-ation,  use of an ultrasonic bath with
ice, addition of NaCl, or other physical meth-
ods. Alternatively, solid-phase  or  other ex-
traction techniques may be used to  prevent
emulsion formation. Any alternative  tech-
nique is acceptable so  long as the require-
ments in Section 9 are met.
  Experience with  aqueous samples  high in
dissolved organic materials (e.g., paper mill
effluents) has shown that acidification of the
sample  prior to extraction may reduce  the
formation   of emulsions.  Paper  industry
methods suggest that the addition of up to
400 mL of  ethanol  to a  1  L effluent sample
may also reduce emulsion formation.  How-
ever, studies by EPA suggest  that  the effect
may be a result of sample  dilution, and that
the addition of reagent water may serve  the
same function. Mechanical techniques may
still be  necessary to complete the phase sep-
aration. If either acidification or addition of
ethanol is utilized, the laboratory  must per-
form the startup tests  described in  Section
9.2 using the same techniques.
  12.1.3   Extract the water sample  two more
times with  60 mL portions of methylene
chloride. Drain each portion through the so-
dium sulfate into the concentrator. After the
third extraction, rinse the separatory funnel
with at  least 20 mL of methylene chloride,
and drain this rinse through the sodium sul-
fate into the concentrator. Repeat  this rinse
at least twice. Set  aside the funnel with so-
dium sulfate if the extract is to be  combined
with the extract from the particles.
  12.1.4   Concentrate the extract using one
of the  macro-concentration  procedures  in
Section 12.6.
  12.1.4.1 If  the  extract is from  a  sample
visibly absent particles (Section  11.1.2.1), ad-
just the final volume of the concentrated ex-
tract to approximately 10 mL with hexane,
transfer to a 250 mL separatory funnel, and
back-extract using  the procedure in Section
12.5.
  12.1.4.2 If the extract is from the aqueous
filtrate  (Section 11.4.3.5), set  aside the con-
centration  apparatus for addition of the SDS
extract  from the particles (Section  12.3.9.1.2).
  12.2 SPE  of  Samples  Containing  Less
Than 1% Solids (References 19-20).
  12.2.1   D'isk preparation.
  12.2.1.1 Place an SPE  disk  on the  base of
the filter holder (Figure  4) and wet with tol-
uene. While holding a GMP 150 filter above
the SPE disk with  tweezers, wet  the filter
with toluene and  lay the filter on the SPE
disk, making sure that air is not trapped be-
tween  the  filter and disk.  Clamp  the filter
and SPE disk between the 1 L glass reservoir
and the vacuum filtration flask.
  12.2.1.2  Rinse the sides  of the  filtration
flask with approx 15 mL of toluene using a
squeeze bottle or syringe. Apply vacuum mo-
mentarily  until a few drops appear at the
drip tip. Release the vacuum and  allow the
filter/disk  to  soak for approx  one minute.
Apply  vacuum and draw all of the toluene
through the filter/disk. Repeat the  wash step
with approx 15 mL of acetone and  allow the
filter/disk to air dry.
  12.2.1.3  Re-wet  the  filter/disk  with  ap-
proximately 15 mL of methanol, allowing the
filter/disk  to  soak  for approximately  one
minute. Pull the  methanol through the  fil-
ter/disk using the  vacuum, but retain a layer
of methanol approximately 1 mm thick on
the filter.  Do not allow the disk to go dry
from this point until the end of the  extrac-
tion.
  12.2.1.4  Rinse the  filter/disk with two 50-
mL portions of reagent water by adding the
water  to  the  reservoir  and pulling most
through, leaving a layer of water on the sur-
face of the  filter.
  12.2.2  Extraction.
  12.2.2.1  Pour  the  spiked sample (Section
11.4.2.2), blank (Section 11.4.2.4), or IPR/OPR
aliquot (Section 11.4.2.5) into the  reservoir
and turn on the vacuum to begin the extrac-
tion. Adjust the vacuum to complete the ex-
traction in no less than 10 minutes. For sam-
ples containing a high concentration of par-
ticles  (suspended  solids),  filtration  times
may be eight hours or longer.
  12.2.2.2 Before all  of the sample has been
pulled through the filter/disk, rinse the sam-
ple bottle with approximately 50 mL of rea-
gent water to remove any solids,  and pour
into the reservoir. Pull through the  filter/
disk.  Use  additional  reagent  water  rinses
until all visible solids are removed.
  12.2.2.3 Before all of the sample and rinses
have  been pulled through  the filter/disk,
rinse the  sides  of the reservoir with small
portions of reagent water.
  12.2.2.4 Allow the  filter/disk to dry, then
remove the filter and disk and place in a
glass Petri dish. Extract the filter and disk
per Section 12.3.
  12.3   SDS Extraction of Samples  Con-
taining Particles, and of Filters  and/or
Disks.
  12.3.1  Charge  a  clean extraction thimble
(Section 6.4.2.2) with  5.0 g of 100/200 mesh sili-
ca (Section 7.5.1.1)  topped with  100 g of
quartz sand (Section 7.3.2).

  NOTE: Do not  disturb  the  silica  layer
throughout the extraction process.
                                          255

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  12.3.2  Place the thimble in a clean extrac-
tor. Place 30--JO mL of toluene in the receiver
and- 200-250 mL of toluene in the flask.
  12.3.3  Pre-extract the glassware by heat-
ing the flask until the  toluene  is boiling.
When properly adjusted, one to two drops of
toluene will fall per second from the  con-
denser tip into the receiver. Extract the ap-
paratus for a minimum of three hours.
  12.3.4  After pre-extraction, cool and dis-
assemble the apparatus.  Rinse the thimble
with toluene and allow to air dry.
  12.3.5  Load the wet sample, filter, and/or
disk from Section 11.4.3.6, 11.5.8, 11.6.4, 11.7.3,
11.7.4, or 12.2.2.4 and any nonaqueous liquid
from  Section 11.6.3  into the thimble and
manually mix into the  sand layer  with  a
clean metal spatula, carefully breaking up
any large lumps of sample.
  12.3.6  Reassemble  the  pre-extracted  SDS
apparatus, and add a fresh charge of toluene
to the receiver and reflux flask. Apply power
to the heating mantle to begin refluxing. Ad-
just the reflux rate to match the rate of per-
colation through  the sand  and  silica  beds
until water removal lessens the  restriction
to toluene flow. Frequently  check the appa-
ratus for foaming during the first two hours
of extraction. If foaming occurs,  reduce the
reflux rate until foaming subsides.
  12.3.7  Drain the water from the receiver
at one to two hours and eight to nine hours,
or sooner  if the receiver fills with  water.
Reflux the sample for a total of 16-24 hours.
Cool and disassemble the apparatus. Record
the total volume of water collected.
  12.3.8  Remove the distilling flask. Drain
the water from  the Dean-Stark receiver and
add any toluene in the receiver  to  the ex-
tract in the flask.
  12.3.9  Concentrate the extract using one
of the  macro-concentration procedures  in
Section 12.6 per  the following:
  12.3.9.1  Extracts from  the particles in an
aqueous sample containing less than 1% sol-
ids (Section 11.4.3.6).
  12.3.9.1.1   Concentrate the  extract  to ap-
proximately 5 mL using the rotary  evapo-
rator or heating mantle procedures in Sec-
tion 12.6.1 or 12.6.2.
  12.3.9.1.2   Quantitatively  transfer  the ex-
tract through the sodium sulfate  (Section
12.1.3) into the apparatus that was set aside
(Section 12.1.4.2) and reconcentrate  to the
level of the toluene.
  12.3.9.1.3   Adjust  to approximately  10 mL
with hexane, transfer to a 250 mL separatory
funnel,  and proceed with  back-extraction
(Section 12.5).
  12.3.9.2  Extracts from  particles (Sections
11.5 through 11.6) or from the SPE filter and
disk  (Section  12.2.2.4)—Concentrate  to ap-
proximately 10  mL using the rotary evapo-
rator or heating  mantle (Section  12.6.1  or
12.6.2), transfer  to  a  250 mL separatory fun-
nel,  and proceed with back-extraction  (Sec-
tion 12.5).
  12.4  Extraction of Tissue—Two procedures
are provided for tissue extraction.
  12.4.1  Soxhlet extraction (Reference 21).
  12.4.1.1  Add 30-40 g of powdered anhydrous
sodium sulfate to each of the beakers (Sec-
tion 11.8.4)  and mix  thoroughly.  Cover  the
beakers with aluminum  foil  and allow  to
equilibrate  for 12-24  hours.  Remix  prior to
extraction to prevent clumping.
  12.4.1.2  Assemble   and  pre-extract   the
Soxhlet   apparatus   per  Sections   12.3.1
through 12.3.4,  except use  the  methylene
chloride:hexane (1:1) mixture for the pre-ex-
traction and  rinsing  and omit the  quartz
sand. The Dean-Stark moisture  trap may
also be omitted, if desired.
  12.4.1.3  Reassemble  the    pre-extracted
Soxhlet apparatus and add a fresh charge of
methylene  chloride:hexane  to  the  reflux
flask.
  12.4.1.4  Transfer the sample/sodium sul-
fate mixture (Section 12.4.1.1) to the Soxhlet
thimble, and install the thimble in the Soxh-
let apparatus.
  12.4.1.5  Rinse  the  beaker  with  several
portions of  solvent mixture  and add  to  the
thimble. Fill the thimble/receiver with sol-
vent. Extract for 18-24 hours.
  12.4.1.6  After  extraction,   cool  and dis-
assemble the apparatus.
  12.4.1.7  Quantitatively   transfer  the  ex-
tract to a macro-concentration device (Sec-
tion 12.6), and concentrate to near dryness.
Set aside the concentration apparatus for re-
use.
  12.4.1.8  Complete the removal of the  sol-
vent using the nitrogen blowdown procedure
(Section 12.7) and a water bath temperature
of  60  °C. Weigh the receiver, record  the
weight, and return the receiver to the blow-
down apparatus, concentrating the residue
until a constant weight is obtained.
  12.4.1.9  Percent lipid determination—The
lipid content is determined by extraction of
tissue  with  the same  solvent system  (meth-
ylene  chloride:hexane)  that  was  used  in
EPA's  National Dioxin Study (Reference 22)
so  that lipid contents are  consistent with
that study.
  12.4.1.9.1   Redissolve the residue in the re-
ceiver  in hexane and spike  1.0 mL  of  the
cleanup standard (Section 7.11) into  the solu-
tion.
  12.4.1.9.2  Transfer  the   residue/hexane  to
the anthropogenic isolation column (Section
13.7.1)  or  bottle  for  the  acidified silica  gel
batch cleanup  (Section 13.7.2), retaining  the
boiling chips in the concentration apparatus.
Use several  rinses to assure that all material
is transferred.  If necessary, sonicate or heat
the receiver slightly to assure that all mate-
rial is re-dissolved. Allow the receiver to dry.
Weigh the receiver and boiling chips.
  12.4.1.9.3  Calculate  the lipid content to
the  nearest three significant  figures  as  fol-
lows:
                                          256

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
 _.      ,.  .,   Weight of residue (g)  .„„
 Percent hpid =	— x 100
                Weight of tissue (g)
  12.4.1.9.4  It is not necessary to determine
 the lipid content of the blank, IPR, or OPR
 aliquots.
  12.4.2 HC1 digestion/extraction  and con-
 centration (References 23-26).
  12.4.2.1  Add 200 mL of 6 N HC1 and 200 mL
 of methylene  chloride:hexane  (1:1)  to the
 sample and QC aliquots (Section 11.8.4).
  12.4.2.2  Cap and shake  each bottle  one to
 three times. Loosen the cap in a hood to vent
 excess pressure. Shake each bottle for 10-30
 seconds and vent.
  12.4.2.3  Tightly cap and place on shaker.
 Adjust the shaker action and speed so that
 the acid, solvent, and tissue are in constant
 motion. However, take care  to avoid such
 violent action that  the bottle  may  be dis-
 lodged  from  the  shaker. Shake  for 12-24
 hours.
  12.4.2.4  After digestion, remove the bot-
 tles  from the shaker. Allow  the  bottles to
 stand so that the solvent and acid layers sep-
 arate.
  12.4.2.5  Decant the solvent through a glass
 funnel with glass-fiber filter  (Sections 6.5.2
 through 6.5.3) containing approximately 10 g
 of granular anhydrous  sodium sulfate (Sec-
 tion 7.2.1) into a macro-concentration appa-
 ratus  (Section 12.6). Rinse the contents of
 the bottle with two 25 mL portions of hexane
 and pour through the sodium sulfate into the
 apparatus.
  12.4.2.6  Concentrate  the  solvent to near
 dryness using a macro-concentration  proce-
 dure (Section 12.6).
  12.4.2.7  Complete the removal of the sol-
 vent using the nitrogen blowdown apparatus
 (Section 12.7) and a water bath temperature
 of 60  °C.  Weigh the  receiver, record the
 weight, and return the  receiver to  the blow-
 down apparatus, concentrating the residue
until a constant weight is obtained.
  12.4.2.8  Percent lipid determination—The
lipid content is determined in the same sol-
vent   system  [methylene  chloride:hexane
 (1:1)] that was used in EPA's National Dioxin
 Study  (Reference 22) so that  lipid contents
are consistent with, that study.
  12.4.2.8.1  Redissolve the residue in  the re-
ceiver  in  hexane and spike 1.0 mL   of the
cleanup standard (Section17.11) into the solu-
tion.
  12.4.2.8.2  Transfer the  residue/hexane  to
the narrow-mouth 100-200 mL bottle  retain-
ing the boiling chips in the receiver. Use sev-
 eral  rinses  to  assure  that all material is
transferred, to a maximum hexane volume of
approximately  70 mL. Allow the receiver to
dry. Weigh the receiver and boiling chips.
  12.4.2.8.3  Calculate the percent  lipid per
Section 12.4.1.9.3. It is not necessary to deter-
mine the lipid content of the blank, IPR, or
OPR aliquots.
  12.4.2.9  Clean up the  extract per Section
13.7.3.
  12.5  Back-Extraction with Base and Acid.
  12.5.1 Spike 1.0 mL of the cleanup  stand-
ard (Section 7.11) into the separatory funnels
containing the sample and QC extracts from
Section 12.1.4.1, 12.3.9.1.3, or 12.3.9.2.
  12.5.2 Partition the extract against 50 mL
of potassium  hydroxide solution  (Section
7.1.1).  Shake for two minutes with periodic
venting into a hood. Remove and discard the
aqueous layer. Repeat the base washing until
no color is visible in  the aqueous layer, to a
maximum  of  four washings. Minimize con-
tact time between the extract and the base
to prevent  degradation  of the  CDDs/CDFs.
Stronger potassium hydroxide solutions may
be employed  for  back-extraction, provided
that the laboratory meets the specifications
for labeled compound recovery  and dem-
onstrates  acceptable  performance using the
procedure in Section 9.2.
  12.5.3 Partition the extract against 50 mL
of sodium chloride solution (Section 7.1.4) in
the same way as with base. Discard the aque-
ous layer.
  12.5.4 Partition the extract against 50 mL
of sulfuric acid (Section 7.1.2) in the same
way as with base. Repeat the acid washing
until no color is visible in the aqueous layer,
to a maximum of four washings.
  12.5.5 Repeat the partitioning against so-
dium chloride solution and discard the aque-
ous layer.
  12.5.6 Pour each extract through a drying
column containing 7-10 cm of granular anhy-
drous  sodium sulfate (Section  7.2.1).  Rinse
the separatory funnel with 30-50 mL of sol-
vent, and pour through  the drying column.
Collect each extract in a round-bottom flask.
Re-concentrate the sample and QC  aliquots
per Sections 12.6 through 12.7, and clean up
the samples and QC  aliquots per Section 13.
  12.6  Macro-Concentration—Extracts    in
toluene are concentrated  using a  rotary
evaporator or a heating  mantle; extracts in
methylene  chloride  or  hexane  are  con-
centrated using a rotary evaporator, heating
mantle, or Kuderna-Danish apparatus.
  12.6.1 Rotary   evaporation—Concentrate
the  extracts  in  separate  round-bottom
flasks.
  12.6.1.1  Assemble  the  rotary  evaporator
according  to  manufacturer's  instructions,
and warm the water bath to 45 °C. On a daily
basis, preclean the rotary evaporator by con-
centrating 100 mL of clean extraction sol-
vent through  the  system. Archive both the
concentrated solvent  and the  solvent in the
catch flask for a contamination check if nec-
essary. Between  samples, three  2-3  mL
aliquots of solvent should be rinsed down the
feed tube into a waste beaker.
  12.6.1.2  Attach  the round-bottom  flask
containing the sample extract to the rotary
evaporator.  Slowly apply vacuum to the sys-
tem, and begin rotating- the sample flask.
                                          257

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  12.6.1.3  Lower  the flask into the  water
bath, and adjust the speed of rotation and
the temperature as required to complete con-
centration in 15-20 minutes. At the proper
rate of concentration,  the flow of solvent
into the receiving flask will be steady, but
no bumping or visible boiling of the extract
will occur.

  NOTE: If the rate  of concentration is too
fast, analyte loss may occur.

  12.6.1.4  When the liquid in the concentra-
tion flask has reached an apparent volume of
approximately 2 mL, remove the flask from
the water bath and stop the rotation. Slowly
and carefully  admit air into the system. Be
sure not to open the valve so quickly that
the sample  is blown out of the flask. Rinse
the feed tube with approximately 2 mL of
solvent.
  12.6.1.5  Proceed to Section 12.6.4 for prepa-
ration  for  back-extraction or  micro-con-
centration and solvent exchange.
  12.6.2  Heating mantle—Concentrate  the
extracts in separate round-bottom flasks.
  12.6.2.1  Add one or two clean boiling chips
to  the  round-bottom flask,  and attach a
three-ball macro Snyder column. Prewet the
column by adding approximately 1 mL of sol-
vent through  the top. Place the round-bot-
tom flask in  a heating mantle, and apply
heat as required to complete the concentra-
tion in  15-20 minutes. At the proper rate of
distillation, the balls of the column will ac-
tively  chatter,  but  the chambers will not
flood.
  12.6.2.2  When the liquid has reached an ap-
parent volume of approximately 10 mL,  re-
move the round-bottom flask from the  heat-
ing mantle and allow the  solvent to  drain
and cool for at least 10 minutes. Remove the
Snyder  column and rinse the glass joint into
the receiver with small portions of solvent.
  12.6.2.3  Proceed to Section 12.6.4 for prepa-
ration  for  back-extraction or  micro-con-
centration and solvent exchange.
  12.6.3  Kuderna-Danish (K-D)—Concentrate
the extracts in separate 500 mL K-D flasks
equipped with 10 mL concentrator tubes. The
K-D technique is used  for  solvents such as
methylene chloride  and hexane. Toluene is
difficult to  concentrate using the K-D tech-
nique unless  a  water bath fed by a  steam
generator is used.
  12.6.3.1  Add one to two clean boiling chips
to  the  receiver.  Attach a  three-ball macro
Snyder  column. Prewet  the column by add-
ing approximately 1  mL of solvent through
the top. Place the K-D apparatus in a hot
water bath  so that the  entire lower rounded
surface  of the flask is bathed with steam.
  12.6.3.2  Adjust the vertical position of the
apparatus and the water temperature as re-
quired to complete the concentration in 15-20
minutes. At the proper rate of distillation,
the balls of the column will actively chatter
but the chambers will not flood.
  12.6.3.3  When the liquid has reached an ap-
parent volume  of 1 mL, remove the K-D ap-
paratus from the bath and allow the solvent
to drain and cool for at least 10 minutes. Re-
move the  Snyder column and rinse the flask
and  its lower  joint  into  the  concentrator
tube with 1-2 mL of solvent. A 5 mL syringe
is recommended for this operation.
  12.6.3.4  Remove the three-ball Snyder col-
umn, add  a fresh boiling chip,  and attach a
two-ball micro Snyder column to the concen-
trator tube.  Prewet  the column  by  adding
approximately 0.5 mL of solvent through the
top.  Place the apparatus  in the  hot water
bath.
  12.6.3.5  Adjust the  vertical  position and
the water temperature as required to com-
plete the  concentration in 5-10 minutes.  At
the proper rate of distillation, the balls of
the  column  will  actively chatter but  the
chambers  will not flood.
  12.6.3.6  When the liquid reaches an appar-
ent volume of 0.5 mL, remove the apparatus
from the water bath  and allow to drain and
cool for at least 10 minutes.
  12.6.3.7  Proceed to  12.6.4 for preparation
for back-extraction  or micro-concentration
and solvent exchange.
  12.6.4  Preparation  for back-extraction or
micro-concentration and solvent exchange.
  12.6.4.1  For back-extraction (Section 12.5),
transfer the extract to a  250 mL separatory
funnel.  Rinse the concentration vessel  with
small portions  of hexane, adjust the  hexane
volume in the separatory funnel to 10-20 mL,
and  proceed  to  back-extraction (Section
12.5).
  12.6.4.2  For determination of the weight of
residue in the extract, or for clean-up proce-
dures other  than back-extraction, transfer
the extract to a blowdown vial using two to
three rinses of solvent. Proceed with micro-
concentration and solvent exchange (Section
12.7).
  12.7  Micro-Concentration and Solvent Ex-
change.
  12.7.1  Extracts to be subjected  to GPC or
HPLC cleanup are exchanged into  methylene
chloride. Extracts to be cleaned up using sili-
ca gel,  alumina,  carbon, and/or Florisil are
exchanged into hexane.
  12.7.2  Transfer  the vial  containing  the
sample  extract to a  nitrogen blowdown de-
vice. Adjust the flow of nitrogen so that the
surface of the solvent is just visibly  dis-
turbed.
  NOTE: A large  vortex in the  solvent may
cause analyte loss.
  12.7.3  Lower the vial into a 45 °C water
bath and continue concentrating.
  12.7.3.1  If  the  extract  is   to  be  con-
centrated to dryness for  weight determina-
tion (Sections  12.4.1.8, 12.4.2.7,  and 13.7.1.4),
blow dry until a constant weight is obtained.
  12.7.3.2  If  the  extract  is   to  be  con-
centrated for injection into the GC/MS or the
                                          258

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Ft. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
solvent is to be exchanged for extract clean-
up, proceed as follows:
  12.7.4 When the volume of the liquid is ap-
proximately  100 L, add 2-3 mL of the desired
solvent (methylene  chloride for  GPC  and
HPLC, or hexane for the other cleanups) and
continue concentration to approximately 100
uL. Repeat the  addition of solvent and con-
centrate once more.
  12.7.5 If the extract is to be cleaned up by
GPC, adjust the volume of the extract to 5.0
mL with methylene chloride. If the  extract
is to be cleaned up by HPLC,  further con-
centrate the extract  to 30 |iL. Proceed with
GPC  or HPLC  cleanup (Section 13.2  or 13.6,
respectively).
  12.7.6 If the extract is to be cleaned up by
column chromatography (alumina,  silica gel,
Carbopak/Celite, or Florisil),  bring the final
volume to  1.0 mL with hexane. Proceed with
column cleanups (Sections  13.3 through 13.5
and 13.8).
  12.7.7 If the  extract is  to be concentrated
for injection into the GC/MS  (Section  14),
quantitatively  transfer the extract to a 0.3
mL conical vial for final concentration, rins-
ing the larger  vial with  hexane and adding
the rinse to the conical vial. Reduce the vol-
ume to approximately 100 nL. Add 10 jiL of
nonane to the vial, and evaporate the solvent
to the level of the nonane.  Seal the vial and
label with  the  sample number.  Store in  the
dark  at room  temperature until  ready  for
GC/MS  analysis. If GC/MS  analysis will not
be performed on the same day, store the vial
at <-10°C.

           13.0  Extract Cleanup

  13.1  Cleanup may not be necessary for rel-
atively clean samples (e.g.,  treated effluents,
groundwater, drinking water).  If particular
circumstances  require the  use  of a cleanup
procedure,  the analyst may use  any or all of
the procedures  below or any other  appro-
priate procedure. Before using a cleanup pro-
cedure, the analyst must demonstrate that
the requirements of Section 9.2 can  be met
using the cleanup procedure. If only 2,3,7,8-
TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF are to be determined,
the cleanup procedures may be optimized for
isolation of these two compounds.
  13.1.1  Gel   permeation  chromatography
(Section 13.2) removes high molecular weight
interferences that cause GC column perform-
ance to degrade. It should be used for all soil
and sediment extracts and  may be used  for
water extracts that are expected to contain
high  molecular weight  organic compounds
(e.g., polymeric materials, humic acids).
  13.1.2  Acid, neutral, and basic  silica  gel
(Section 13.3),  alumina  (Section  13.4),  and
Florisil (Section  13.8) are  used to remove
nonpolar and polar interferences.  Alumina
and    Florisil    are    used    to   remove
chlorodiphenyl ethers.
  13.1.3  Carbopak/Celite  (Section  13.5)   is
used to remove nonpolar interferences.
  13.1.4 HPLC (Section 13.6) is used to  pro-
vide specificity for the 2,3,7,8-substituted and
other CDD and CDF isomers.
  13.1.5 The anthropogenic isolation column
(Section 13.7.1), acidified silica gel batch ad-
sorption procedure (Section 13.7.2),  and sul-
furic acid and base back-extraction  (Section
13.7.3) are used for removal of lipids from tis-
sue samples.
  13.2  Gel   Permeation    Chromatography
(GPC).
  13.2.1 Column packing.
  13.2.1.1  Place 70-75 g- of  SX-3 Bio-beads
(Section 6.7.1.1) in a 400-500 mL beaker.
  13.2.1.2  Cover the  beads with  methylene
chloride and allow to swell overnight (a min-
imum of 12 hours).
  13.2.1.3  Transfer the swelled beads to the
column (Section 6.7.1.1) and pump  solvent
through the column,  from bottom to top, at
4.5-5.5  mL/minute prior to  connecting the
column to the detector.
  13.2.1.4  After purging the column with sol-
vent for one to two hours, adjust the column
head pressure to 7-10 psig and purge for  four
to five hours to remove air. Maintain a head
pressure of 7-10 psig.  Connect the column to
the detector (Section 6.7.1.4).
  13.2.2 Column calibration.
  13.2.2.1  Load 5 mL of the calibration solu-
tion (Section 7.4) into the sample loop.
  13.2.2.2  Inject the calibration solution and
record  the  signal from the detector.  The
elution pattern  will be corn oil,  bis(2-ethyl
hexyl)phthalate,  pentachlorophenol,  pery-
lene, and sulfur.
  13.2.2.3  Set the "dump time"  to allow >85%
removal of the corn oil and >85% collection
of the phthalate.
  13.2.2.4  Set the "collect time" to the peak
minimum between perylene and sulfur.
  13.2.2.5  Verify  the  calibration with  the
calibration solution  after every 20 extracts.
Calibration is verified if the recovery of the
pentachlorophenol is  greater  than 85%. If
calibration is not verified, the system shall
be recalibrated  using the calibration solu-
tion, and the previous 20 samples shall be re-
extracted and cleaned up using the  cali-
brated GPC system.
  13.2.3 Extract cleanup—GPC requires that
the column not be overloaded. The column
specified in this method is designed to han-
dle a maximum of 0.5 g  of high molecular
weight material in a 5 mL extract. If the ex-
tract is known or expected to  contain more
than 0.5 g, the extract is split into  aliquots
for GPC, and the aliquots are combined after
elution from the column.  The residue con-
tent of the extract may be  obtained gravi-
metrically by evaporating the solvent from a
50 \iL aliquot.
  13.2.3.1  Filter the  extract or load through
the filter holder  (Section 6.7.1.3)  to remove
the particles. Load the 5.0 mL extract onto
the column.
                                          259

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  13.2.3.2  Blute the extract using the cali-
bration data  determined in  Section 13.2.2.
Collect the eluate  in  a clean  400-500 mL
beaker.
  13.2.3.3  Rinse  the sample  loading  tube
thoroughly with methylene chloride between
extracts to prepare for the next sample.
  13.2.3.4  If a particularly dirty extract  is
encountered,  a  5.0 mL  methylene  chloride
blank  shall be run  through  the system to
check for carry-over.
  13.2.3.5  Concentrate the  eluate per Sec-
tions 12.6 and 12.7 for further cleanup or in-
jection into the GC/MS.
  13.3  Silica Gel Cleanup.
  13.3.1 Place a glass-wool plug  in a 15 mm
ID chromatography  column (Section 6.7.4.2).
Pack the column bottom to top with: 1 g sili-
ca gel (Section 7.5.1.1),  4 g basic silica gel
(Section 7.5.1.3), 1 g  silica gel, 8 g acid silica
gel (Section  7.5.1.2),  2 g silica gel, and 4 g
granular anhydrous  sodium sulfate  (Section
7.2.1). Tap the column to settle  the adsorb-
ents.
  13.3.2 Pre-elute the  column  with 50-100
mL of hexane. Close the stopcock when the
hexane is within 1 mm of the sodium sulfate.
Discard the  eluate.  Check the  column for
channeling. If channeling is present, discard
the column and prepare another.
  13.3.3 Apply the concentrated extract to
the column. Open the stopcock until the ex-
tract is within 1 mm of the sodium sulfate.
  13.3.4 Rinse the receiver twice with  1 mL
portions of hexane,  and  apply separately to
the column. Elute the  CDDs/CDFs  with 100
mL hexane, and collect the eluate.
  13.3.5 Concentrate the eluate per  Sections
12.6 and 12.7 for further cleanup  or injection
into the HPLC or GC/MS.
  13.3.6 For  extracts of samples known to
contain  large quantities  of other organic
compounds (such as paper mill effluents),  it
may be advisable to increase the capacity  of
the silica gel column. This may be accom-
plished by increasing the  strengths of the
acid and basic silica gels. The acid silica gel
(Section 7.5.1.2) may be increased in strength
to as much as 44%  w/w (7.9 g sulfuric acid
added to 10 g  silica gel). The basic silica gel
(Section 7.5.1.3) may be increased in strength
to as  much  as 33% w/w (50 mL IN NaOH
added  to 100 g silica gel), or the potassium
silicate (Section 7.5.1.4) may be used.

  NOTE: The  use of stronger acid silica gel
(44% w/w) may lead to  charring of organic
compounds in some extracts. The charred
material may retain some of the  analytes
and  lead to lower recoveries of  CDDs/CDFs.
Increasing the  strengths  of  the  acid and
basic silica gel may also  require different
volumes of hexane than those specified above
to elute the analytes off the column. There-
fore, the  performance of  the method  after
such modifications must be verified by the
procedure in Section 9.2.
  13.4  Alumina Cleanup.
  13.4.1  Place a glass-wool plug in a 15 mm
ID chromatography column (Section 6.7.4.2).
  13.4.2  If using acid alumina, pack the col-
umn by  adding 6 g  acid  alumina (Section
7.5.2.1). If using basic alumina, substitute 6 g
basic alumina (Section 7.5.2.2).  Tap the col-
umn to settle the adsorbents.
  13.4.3  Pre-elute the  column with  50-100
mL of  hexane.  Close  the stopcock when the
hexane is within 1 mm of the alumina.
  13.4.4  Discard the  eluate. Check  the col-
umn for channeling. If channeling is present,
discard the column and prepare another.
  13.4.5  Apply  the concentrated  extract  to
the column. Open the stopcock  until the ex-
tract is within 1 mm of the alumina.
  13.4.6  Rinse the receiver twice  with  1 mL
portions  of hexane and apply separately  to
the column. Elute the interfering compounds
with 100 mL hexane and discard the eluate.
  13.4.7  The  choice  of eluting solvents will
depend on the choice of  alumina (acid  or
basic) made in Section 13.4.2.
  13.4.7.1   If using acid  alumina, elute the
CDDs/CDFs  from  the column  with  20 mL
methylene chloride:hexane (20:80 v/v). Collect
the eluate.
  13.4.7.2   If using basic alumina, elute the
CDDs/CDFs  from  the column  with  20 mL
methylene chloride:hexane (50:50 v/v). Collect
the eluate.
  13.4.8  Concentrate  the eluate per Sections
12.6 and 12.7 for further cleanup or injection
into the HPLC or GC/MS.
  13.5  Carbon Column.
  13.5.1  Cut both ends from a 10 mL dispos-
able serological  pipet  (Section  6.7.3.2)  to
produce  a 10  cm column.  Fire-polish both
ends and  flare both ends if desired. Insert a
glass-wool plug at one end, and pack the col-
umn with 0.55 g of Carbopak/Celite (Section
7.5.3.3)  to form an  adsorbent  bed approxi-
mately 2 cm long. Insert a glass-wool plug on
top of the bed to hold the adsorbent in place.
  13.5.2  Pre-elute the column with 5 mL of
toluene followed by 2 mL of methylene chlo-
ride: methanol:toluene  (15:4:1 v/v), 1 mL  of
methylene chloride:cyclohexane (1:1 v/v), and
5 mL of hexane. If the flow rate of eluate ex-
ceeds 0.5  mL/minute, discard the column.
  13.5.3  When the solvent  is within 1 mm of
the column packing, apply the sample  ex-
tract to  the column. Rinse the sample con-
tainer  twice with 1 mL portions of hexane
and apply separately to the column. Apply 2
mL of hexane to complete the  transfer.
  13.5.4  Elute  the  interfering  compounds
with two 3 mL portions of hexane,  2 mL of
methylene chloride:cyclohexane (1:1 v/v), and
2     mL     of     methylene      chlo-
ride:methanol:toluene (15:4:1  v/v).  Discard
the eluate.
  13.5.5  Invert the  column,  and elute the
CDDs/CDFs with 20 mL of  toluene. If carbon
particles  are  present in the  eluate,  filter
through glass-fiber filter paper.
                                          260

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
  13.5.6  Concentrate the eluate per Sections
12.6 and 12.7 for further cleanup or injection
into the HPLC or GO/MS.
  13.6  HPLC (Reference 6).
  13.6.1  Column calibration.
  13.6.1.1  Prepare  a  calibration standard
containing  the  2,3,7,8-substituted  isomers
and/or other isomers of interest  at a con-
centration  of  approximately 500 pg/nL  in
methylene chloride.
  13.6.1.2  Inject 30 |iL of the calibration so-
lution into the  HPLC and record the signal
from  the  detector. Collect  the  eluant for
reuse. The  elution order  will be the tetra-
through octa-isomers.
  13.6.1.3  Establish the collection time for
the tetra-isomers and for the other  isomers
of interest. Following calibration, flush the
injection system with copious quantities of
methylene chloride, including a minimum of
five 50 (iL injections while the detector is
monitored,  to  ensure  that  residual CDDs/
CDPs are removed from the system.
  13.6.1.4  Verify the  calibration  with  the
calibration solution after every 20 extracts.
Calibration is verified if the  recovery of the
CDDs/CDFs from the  calibration standard
(Section 13.6.1.1) is 75-125% compared to the
calibration (Section 13.6.1.2). If calibration is
not verified, the system shall be recalibrated
using the calibration solution, and  the pre-
vious 20 samples shall  be re-extracted and
cleaned up using the calibrated system.
  13.6.2  Extract  cleanup—HPLC   requires
that the column not be  overloaded. The col-
umn specified in this method is designed to
handle a maximum of 30 M.L of extract. If the
extract cannot be concentrated to less than
30 nL, it is split into fractions and the frac-
tions  are combined after elution from  the
column.
  13.6.2.1  Rinse the sides of the vial twice
with 30 nL of methylene chloride and reduce
to 30  nL  with the  evaporation  apparatus
(Section 12.7).
  13.6.2.2  Inject the  30  nL extract into  the
HPLC.
  13.6.2.3  Elute the extract  using the cali-
bration  data  determined  in  Section  13.6.1.
Collect the fraction(s) in a clean 20 mL con-
centrator   tube   containing  5    mL   of
hexaneracetone (1:1 v/v).
  13.6.2.4  If an extract containing  greater
than 100 ng/mL of total CDD or CDF is en-
countered, a 30 jiL methylene chloride blank
shall be run through the system to check for
carry-over.
  13.6.2.5  Concentrate  the eluate per  Sec-
tion 12.7 for injection into  the GC/MS.
  13.7  Cleanup  of Tissue  Lipids—Lipids are
removed from the  Soxhlet extract using ei-
ther  the  anthropogenic  isolation  column
(Section 13.7.1) or acidified silica gel (Section
13.7.2), or are removed from the HC1 digested
extract using sulfuric acid and base back-ex-
traction (Section 13.7.3).
  13.7.1 Anthropogenic   isolation   column
(References 22 and 27)—Used for removal of
lipids from the Soxhlet/SDS extraction (Sec-
tion 12.4.1).
  13.7.1.1  Prepare  the  column as  given in
Section 7.5.4.
  13.7.1.2  Pre-elute the column with 100 mL
of hexane. Drain the hexane layer to the top
of the column, but do not expose the sodium
sulfate.
  13.7.1.3  Load the sample and rinses (Sec-
tion 12.4.1.9.2)  onto the  column by draining
each portion to the top of the bed. Elute the
CDDs/CDFs from the column into  the appa-
ratus  used  for  concentration   (Section
12.4.1.7) using 200 mL of hexane.
  13.7.1.4  Concentrate  the  cleaned up  ex-
tract (Sections 12.6 through 12.7) to constant
weight per Section 12.7.3.1. If more than 500
mg of material remains, repeat the cleanup
using  a  fresh  anthropogenic isolation col-
umn.
  13.7.1.5  Redissolve the  extract in  a solvent
suitable  for the additional  cleanups to  be
used (Sections 13.2 through 13.6 and 13.8).
  13.7.1.6  Spike 1.0 mL of the cleanup stand-
ard (Section 7.11) into the residue/solvent.
  13.7.1.7  Clean up the extract using the pro-
cedures in Sections 13.2 through 13.6 and 13.8.
Alumina  (Section  13.4)  or  Florisil  (Section
13.8)  and  carbon  (Section  13.5)   are  rec-
ommended as  minimum additional cleanup
steps.
  13.7.1.8  Following  cleanup,  concentrate
the extract to 10 jiL as described in Section
12.7 and proceed with the analysis in Section
14.
  13.7.2 Acidified silica gel (Reference 28)—
Procedure alternate  to  the anthropogenic
isolation column (Section 13.7.1) that is used
for removal  of lipids from the Soxhlet/SDS
extraction (Section 12.4.1).
  13.7.2.1  Adjust the volume of  hexane  in
the  bottle  (Section  12.4.1.9.2) to  approxi-
mately 200 mL.
  13.7.2.2  Spike 1.0 mL of the cleanup stand-
ard (Section 7.11) into the residue/solvent.
  13.7.2.3  Drop the stirring bar into the bot-
tle, place the  bottle on the stirring plate,
and begin stirring.
  13.7.2.4  Add 30-100 g of acid silica gel (Sec-
tion  7.5.1.2)  to  the  bottle  while  stirring,
keeping the silica gel in motion. Stir for two
to three hours.

  NOTE: 30 grams of silica gel should be ade-
quate  for most samples  and will  minimize
contamination from this source.

  13.7.2.5  After stirring, pour the extract
through approximately 10 g of granular an-
hydrous sodium  sulfate  (Section  7.2.1)  con-
tained in a funnel with glass-fiber filter into
a  macro  contration  device  (Section 12.6).
Rinse  the bottle and sodium sulfate with
hexane to complete the transfer.
                                          261

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Math. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  13.7.2.6  Concentrate the  extract per Sec-
tions 12.6 through 12.7 and clean up the  ex-
tract using the procedures in Sections 13.2
through 13.6 and 13.8. Alumina (Section 13.4)
or Florisil (Section 13.8) and carbon (Section
13.5)  are  recommended  as minimum  addi-
tional cleanup steps.
  13.7.3  Sulfuric acid and base back-extrac-
tion.  Used with HC1 digested extracts  (Sec-
tion 12.4.2).
  13.7.3.1  Spike 1.0 mL of the cleanup stand-
ard (Section 7.11)  into the residue/solvent
(Section 12.4.2.8.2).
  13.7.3.2  Add  10  mL of concentrated sul-
furic acid to the bottle. Immediately cap and
shake one to three times.  Loosen cap in a
hood  to vent excess pressure. Cap and shake
the bottle so that the residue/solvent is  ex-
posed to the acid for a total time of approxi-
mately  45 seconds.
  13.7.3.3  Decant the hexane into  a 250 mL
separatory funnel making sure that no acid
is transferred.  Complete the  quantitative
transfer with several hexane rinses.
  13.7.3.4  Back  extract the solvent/residue
with 50  mL of potassium hydroxide solution
per Section 12.5.2,  followed by two reagent
water rinses.
  13.7.3.5  Drain the extract through a  filter
funnel  containing approximately  10  g  of
granular  anhydrous  sodium  sulfate  in a
glass-fiber filter into a macro  concentration
device (Section 12.6).
  13.7.3.6  Concentrate  the  cleaned  up  ex-
tract to a volume suitable for the additional
cleanups given in Sections 13.2 through 13.6
and  13.8.   Gel  permeation  chromatography
(Section  13.2),  alumina (Section  13.4)   or
Florisil (Section 13.8),  and Carbopak/Celite
(Section 13.5) are recommended as minimum
additional cleanup steps.
  13.7.3.7  Following  cleanup,   concentrate
the extract to  10 L as  described in Section
12.7 and proceed with analysis per Section 14.
  13.8 Florisil Cleanup (Reference 29).
  13.8.1  Pre-elute the activated  Florisil col-
umn (Section 7.5.3) with 10  mL of methylene
chloride    followed    by    10    mL    of
hexane:methylene chloride  (98:2 v/v) and dis-
card the solvents.
  13.8.2  When the solvent is within 1 mm of
the packing, apply the sample extract  (in
hexane) to the column. Rinse  the  sample
container  twice  with  1  mL  portions  of
hexane  and apply to the column.
  13.8.3  Elute  the  interfering  compounds
with  '20 mL of hexane:methylene  chloride
(98:2) and  discard the eluate.
  13.8.4  Elute the CDDs/CDFs with 35 mL of
methylene chloride and  collect the eluate.
Concentrate the  eluate per  Sections 12.6
through 12.7 for further cleanup  or for injec-
tion into the HPLC or GC/MS.

         14.0  HRGC/HRMS Analysis
  14.1 Establish the  operating  conditions
given in Section 10.1.
  14.2  Add 10 uL of the appropriate internal
standard solution (Section 7.12) to the sam-
ple extract immediately prior to injection to
minimize the possibility of loss  by evapo-
ration, adsorption, or reaction. If  an extract
is to be reanalyzed and evaporation has  oc-
curred, do not add more instrument internal
standard solution. Rather, bring the extract
back to its previous volume (e.g.,  19 L) with
pure nonane  only (18 L if 2 L injections are
used).
  14.3  Inject  1.0 uL  or  2.0 (iL of the con-
centrated extract  containing the  internal
standard  solution,  using  on-column  or
splitless injection. The volume injected must
be identical to the volume used for calibra-
tion  (Section 10). Start the GC column ini-
tial isothermal hold upon injection.  Start
MS data collection after  the solvent peak
elutes. Stop data collection after  the OCDD
and OCDF  have eluted. If only 2,3,7,8-TCDD
and 2,3,7,8-TCDF are  to be determined, stop
data collection after elution of these com-
pounds. Return  the  column  to  the initial
temperature for analysis of the next extract
or standard.

   15.0 System and Laboratory Performance
  15.1  At the beginning of each 12-hour shift
during which analyses are performed, GC/MS
system  performance  and  calibration are
verified for all CDDs/CDFs and labeled com-
pounds. For these tests, analysis  of the CSS
calibration verification (VER) standard (Sec-
tion 7.13 and Table 4) and the isomer speci-
ficity test standards (Section 7.15  and Table
5) shall be used to verify all performance cri-
teria. Adjustment and/or recalibration (Sec-
tion 10) shall be performed until all perform-
ance criteria are met. Only after all perform-
ance criteria are met may samples, blanks,
IPRs, and OPRs be analyzed.
  15.2  MS  Resolution—A static   resolving
power  of at  least 10,000 (10% valley defini-
tion)  must be demonstrated at the  appro-
priate m/z before any analysis is  performed.
Static resolving power checks must be per-
formed at  the beginning and at  the end of
each 12-hour shift according to procedures in
Section 10.1.2. Corrective  actions  must be
implemented whenever the resolving power
does not meet the requirement.
  15.3  Calibration Verification.
  15.3.1  Inject the VER standard using the
procedure in Section 14.
  15.3.2  The  m/z abundance  ratios for  all
CDDs/CDFs  shall be  within  the   limits in
Table 9;  otherwise, the mass spectrometer
shall be adjusted until the m/z abundance ra-
tios fall within the limits  specified, and the
verification test shall be repeated. If the  ad-
justment alters the resolution of the mass
spectrometer,  resolution  shall be verified
(Section   10.1.2)  prior  to  repeat  of the
verification test.
  15.3.3  The  peaks representing  each CDD/
CDF  and  labeled  compound  in   the  VER
                                          262

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
standard must tie present with S/N of at least
10; otherwise, the mass spectrometer shall be
adjusted and the verification test repeated.
  15.3.4 Compute  the  concentration of each
CDD/CDP  compound  by  isotope  dilution
(Section 10.5) for those compounds that have
labeled analogs (Table 1). Compute  the con-
centration of the  labeled compounds by the
internal  standard method  (Section  10.6).
These concentrations are computed based on
the calibration data in Section 10.
  15.3.5 For each  compound,  compare the
concentration   with    the    calibration
verification limit  in Table 6. If only 2,3,7,8-
TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDP are to be determined,
compare the  concentration  to the  limit in
Table 6a.  If all compounds meet  the accept-
ance  criteria, calibration has been verified
and  analysis of standards  and  sample ex-
tracts may proceed. If,  however, any  com-
pound fails its respective limit, the measure-
ment system is not performing- properly for
that compound. In this event, prepare a fresh
calibration standard or correct the  problem
causing the failure and repeat the resolution
(Section 15.2) and  verification (Section 15.3)
tests, or recalibrate (Section  10).
  15.4  Retention Times and GO Resolution.
  15.4.1 Retention times.
  15.4.1.1  Absolute—The absolute retention
times  of the  "Cu-l,2,3,4-TCDD   and  »C12-
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD  GCMS  internal standards
in the verification test (Section 15.3) shall be
within ±15 seconds of the retention times ob-
tained during calibration (Sections 10.2.1 and
10.2.4).
  15.4.1.2  Relative—The  relative retention
times  of CDDs/CDFs and labeled  compounds
in the verification test (Section 15.3) shall be
within the limits given in Table 2.
  15.4.2 GC resolution.
  15.4.2.1  Inject   the    isomer   specificity
standards (Section 7.15)  on their respective
columns.
  15.4.2.2  The valley height  between 2,3,7,8-
TCDD and the other tetra-dloxin isomers at
m/z 319.8965, and  between 2,3,7,8-TCDF and
the other tetra-furan isomers at m/z 303.9016
shall  not exceed 25% on their respective col-
umns (Figures 6 and 7).
  15.4.3 If the absolute retention  time  of
any compound is not within the limits speci-
fied or if the 2,3,7,8-isomers are not resolved,
the GC is not performing properly. In this
event,  adjust the GC and  repeat the
verification test (Section 15.3) or  recalibrate
(Section 10), or replace the GC column and
either verify calibration or recalibrate.
  15.5  Ongoing Precision and Recovery.
  15.5.1 Analyze the extract of the  ongoing
precision  and recovery (OPR) aliquot (Sec-
tion 11.4.2.5, 11.5.4, 11.6.2, 11.7.4,  or 11.8.3.2)
prior  to analysis of samples  from the same
batch.
  15.5.2 Compute the concentration of each
CDD/CDF  by isotope dilution for  those com-
pounds that have labeled  analogs (Section
10.5).   Compute   the   concentration   of
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD,  OCDF, and each  labeled
compound by the internal standard method
(Section 10.6).
  15.5.3  For each CDD/CDF and labeled com-
pound,  compare the  concentration  to  the
OPR limits given in Table 6. If only 2,3,7,8-
TCDD  and 2,3,7,8-TCDF are to be determined,
compare the concentration to the limits in
Table 6a. If all compounds meet the  accept-
ance criteria, system performance is  accept-
able and analysis of blanks and samples may
proceed.  If,  however, any  individual con-
centration falls outside  of the range given,
the  extraction/concentration  processes  are
not  being performed properly  for that com-
pound. In this event, correct  the problem, re-
prepare, extract,  and clean up the  sample
batch and repeat  the  ongoing precision  and
recovery test (Section  15.5).
  15.5.4  Add results that pass the specifica-
tions in Section 15.5.3  to initial and previous
ongoing data for each  compound in each  ma-
trix. Update QC charts to form a graphic  rep-
resentation of continued laboratory perform-
ance. Develop a statement of laboratory ac-
curacy  for each CDD/CDF  in each  matrix
type by calculating the  average percent re-
covery (R) and the standard deviation of  per-
cent recovery (SR). Express the accuracy  as a
recovery interval from R-2SR  to R=2SR.  For
example,  if R=95% and SR=5%, the accuracy
is 85-105%.
  15.6  Blank—Analyze the method blank ex-
tracted with each  sample batch immediately
following analysis of the OPR aliquot to
demonstrate freedom from   contamination
and  freedom from carryover from the OPR
analysis.  The results of the  analysis of the
blank must meet  the  specifications in Sec-
tion 9.5.2 before sample analyses may pro-
ceed.

        16.0 Qualitative Determination
  A CDD, CDF, or labeled compound is iden-
tified in a standard, blank,  or sample when
all of the criteria in  Sections 16.1 through
16.4 are met.
  16.1  The signals for  the two exact m/z's in
Table 8 must be present  and must maximize
within the same two seconds.
  16.2  The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N)  for the
GC peak at each exact m/z must be greater
than or equal to 2.5 for each CDD or CDF de-
tected  in a sample extract, and greater than
or equal to 10 for all CDDs/CDFs in the cali-
bration standard (Sections 10.2.3 and 15.3.3).
  16.3  The ratio of the  integrated areas of
the two exact m/z's specified  in Table 8 must
be within the limit in Table 9, or within ±10%
of the ratio in the  midpoint (CSS) calibration
or calibration verification (VER), whichever
is most recent.
  16.4  The  relative retention time  of  the
peak for  a 2,3,7,8-substituted  CDD or CDF
must be within the limit in Table 2. The re-
tention  time of  peaks  representing non-
                                         263

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
                      40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
2,3,7,8-substituted CDDs/CDPs must be with-
in the retention time windows established in
Section 10.3.
  16.5  Confirmatory Analysis—Isomer speci-
ficity for 2,3,7,8-TCDF cannot be achieved on
the DB-5 column.  Therefore, any sample in
which 2,3,7,8-TCDF is identified by analysis
on a DB-5 column must have a confirmatory
analysis performed on a DB-225, SP-2330, or
equivalent GO column. The operating condi-
tions in Section 10.1.1 may be adjusted to op-
timize the analysis  on the second GC col-
umn, but the GO/MS  must meet  the  mass
resolution and  calibration specifications in
Section 10.
  16.6  If the criteria for  identification in
Sections 16.1 through  16.5 are not met, the
ODD or CDF has not been identified and the
results  may not be  reported for regulatory
compliance  purposes.  If interferences  pre-
clude identification,  a new aliquot  of sample
must be extracted, further  cleaned up, and
analyzed.
  17.0  Quantitative Determination
  17.1  Isotope  Dilution  Quantitation—By
adding a known amount of a labeled  com-
pound  to every sample prior  to extraction,
correction for recovery of the CDD/CDF can
be made because the  CDD/CDF and its la-
beled analog exhibit  similar effects upon ex-
traction, concentration, and gas  chroma-
tography. Relative response (RR) values are
used in conjunction with the initial calibra-
tion data described in Section 10.5 to deter-
mine concentrations directly, so long as la-
beled compound spiking levels are  constant,
using the following equation:
     Cex (ng/mL) =
                  _(Aln+A2n)C,
where:
Cex = The concentration of the CDD/CDF in
  the extract, and the other terms are as de-
  fined in Section 10.5.2.
  17.1.1  Because of a potential interference,
the labeled analog of OCDF is not added to
the sample. Therefore, OCDF  is quantitated
against labeled OCDD. As a result, the con-
centration of OCDF is corrected for the re-
           covery of the labeled OCDD. In instances
           where OCDD and OCDF behave differently
           during sample extraction, concentration, and
           cleanup procedures,  this may decrease the
           accuracy  of the OCDF results. However,
           given the low toxicity of this compound rel-
           ative to the  other dioxins and furans, the po-
           tential decrease in  accuracy is not consid-
           ered significant.
             17.1.2  Because  13C,2-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD   is
           used as an instrument internal standard (i.e.,
           not added before extraction of the sample), it
           cannot be used to quantitate the 1,2,3,7,8,9-
           HxCDD by strict isotope dilution procedures.
           Therefore, 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD is quantitated
           using the averaged response of the labeled
           analogs of the  other two 2,3,7,8-substituted
           HxCDD's:  1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD and  1.2,3,6,7,8-
           HxCDD. As  a result, the  concentration  of
           1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD is corrected for the average
           recovery of the other two HxCDD's.
             17.1.3  Any peaks representing non-2,3,7,8-
           substituted   CDDs/CDFs  are  quantitated
           using an average of the response factors from
           all of the labeled 2,3,7,8-isomers at the same
           level of chlorination.
             17.2 Internal Standard Quantitation and
           Labeled Compound Recovery.
             17.2.1  Compute  the   concentrations   of
           1,2,3,7,8,9—HxCDD,   OCDF,   the  "C-labeled
           analogs and  the 37C-labeled cleanup  standard
           in the extract using the response factors de-
           termined from  the  initial calibration data
           (Section 10.6) and the following equation:
                                                 Cex(ng/mL) =
                               (Als+A2s)Cis

                               (Alis+A2ls)RF
           where:
           Cex =  The concentration of the CDD/CDF in
             the  extract, and the other terms are as de-
             fined in Section 10.6.1.

             NOTE: There is only one m/z for the 37Cl-la-
           beled  standard.
             17.2.2  Using the  concentration  in  the ex-
           tract  determined above, compute the percent
           recovery of the 13C-labeled compounds and
           the 37C-labeled  cleanup standard using the
           following equation:
                 Recovery (%) =
Concentration found (|ig/mL)
Concentration spiked (ng/mL)
xlOO
  17.3  The concentration of a CDD/CDF in
the solid phase of the sample is computed
using the concentration of the compound in
           the extract and the weight of the solids (Sec-
           tion 11.5.1), as follows:
                                         264

-------
Environmental Protection Agency


                     Concentration in solid (ng/kg) =
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613


         (cexxVex)
where:
Cex = The concentration of the compound in
  the extract.
Vox = The extract volume in mL.
Ws = The sample weight (dry weight) in kg.
  17.4  The concentration of a CDD/CDF in
the aqueous phase of the sample is computed
using the concentration of the compound in
the  extract  and the volume  of water ex-
tracted (Section 11.4 or 11.5), as follows:
                  Concentration in aqueous phase (pg/L) =
                                                          (CexxVex)
where:
Cex = The concentration of the compound in
  the extract.
Vex = The extract volume in mL.
V, = The sample volume in liters.
  17.5  If the SICP area at  either quantita-
tion m/z for any compound exceeds the cali-
bration range of the system, a smaller sam-
ple aliquot is extracted.
  17.5.1   For aqueous samples containing 1%
solids or less, dilute 100 mL, 10 mL, etc., of
sample to 1 L with reagent water and re-pre-
pare, extract, clean up, and analyze per Sec-
tions 11 through 14.
  17.5.2   For   samples  containing  greater
than 1% solids, extract an amount of sample
equal to "10, 1"°°, etc.,  of the amount used in
Section 11.5.1. Re-prepare, extract, clean up,
and analyze per  Sections 11 through 14.
  17.5.3   If a smaller sample  size will not be
representative of the  entire sample,  dilute
the sample extract by a factor of 10, adjust
the concentration of the instrument internal
standard to 100 pg/|iL in the extract, and ana-
lyze an aliquot of this  diluted extract by the
internal standard method.
  17.6  Results are reported to three signifi-
cant figures for the CDDs/CDFs and labeled
compounds found in all  standards,  blanks,
and samples.
  17.6.1   Reporting units and levels.
  17.6.1.1 Aqueous samples—Report results
in pg/L (parts-per-quadrillion).
  17.6.1.2 Samples containing  greater  than
1% solids (soils,  sediments, filter cake, com-
post)—Report results in ng/kg based  on the
dry weight of the sample. Report the percent
solids so that the result may be corrected.
  17.6.1.3 Tissues—Report results in ng/kg of
wet tissue, not on the  basis of the lipid con-
tent of the sample. Report the percent lipid
content,  so that the data user can calculate
the concentration on a lipid basis if desired.
  17.6.1.4 Reporting level.
  17.6.1.4.1  Standards (VER, IPR, OPR) and
samples—Report results at or above the min-
imum  level (Table 2). Report results  below
the minimum level as not detected or as re-
quired by the regulatory authority.
  17.6.1.4.2  Blanks—Report  results   above
one-third the ML.
  17.6.2 Results for CDDs/CDFs  in samples
that have been diluted are reported  at the
least dilute level at which the areas at the
quantitation m/z's are within the calibration
range (Section 17.5).
  17.6.3 For  CDDs/CDFs  having  a labeled
analog, results are reported at the least di-
lute level at which the area at the quantita-
tion m/z is within the calibration range (Sec-
tion 17.5) and the labeled compound recovery
is within the  normal range for the method
(Section 9.3 and Tables 6, 6a, 7, and 7a).
  17.6.4 Additionally, if requested, the total
concentration of all isomers in an individual
level of chlorination (i.e., total TCDD, total
TCDF, total Paced, etc.)  may be reported by
summing the  concentrations of all isomers
identified in that level of  chlorination,  in-
cluding  both 2,3,7,8-substituted  and non-
2,3,7,8-substituted isomers.

      18.0  Analysis of Complex Samples

  18.1  Some samples may contain high lev-
els (>10 ng/L; >1000 ng/kg) of the compounds
of interest, interfering  compounds,  and/or
polymeric materials. Some extracts will not
concentrate to 10 |j.L (Section 12.7);  others
may overload the GC column and/or mass
spectrometer.
  18.2  Analyze a smaller aliquot of the sam-
ple (Section 17.5) when the extract will not
concentrate to 10 |iL after all cleanup proce-
dures have been exhausted.
  18.3  Chlorodiphenyl           Ethers—If
chromatographic  peaks  are detected  at the
retention time of  any CDDs/CDFs in  any  of
the m/z  channels  being  monitored for the
                                         265

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
chlorodiphenyl ethers (Table 8), cleanup pro-
cedures must be employed until these inter-
ferences are removed. Alumina (Section 13.4)
and Florisil (Section 13.8) are recommended
for removal of chlorodiphenyl ethers.
  18.4  Recovery of Labeled Compounds—In
most samples, recoveries of the labeled com-
pounds will be similar to those from reagent
water or from the  alternate matrix (Section
7.6).
  18.4.1  If the recovery of any of the labeled
compounds is outside of the  normal range
(Table 7), a diluted sample shall be analyzed
(Section 17.5).
  18.4.2  If the recovery of any of the labeled
compounds in the  diluted sample  is outside
of normal range, the calibration verification
standard (Section 7.13) shall be analyzed and
calibration verified (Section 15.3).
  18.4.3  If the calibration cannot be verified,
a new calibration must be performed and the
original sample extract reanalyzed.
  18.4.4  If the calibration is verified and the
diluted  sample does  not meet the  limits for
labeled compound recovery, the method does
not apply to the sample being analyzed and
the result may not  be reported  for  regu-
latory compliance  purposes. In this case, al-
ternate extraction  and cleanup procedures in
this method must be employed to resolve the
interference. If all  cleanup procedures in this
method  have  been  employed and labeled
compound recovery  remains outside of the
normal range, extraction and/or cleanup pro-
cedures that are beyond  this scope of this
method will be required to  analyze  these
samples.

          79.0  Pollution Prevention

  19.1  The solvents used in this method pose
little threat to the environment when man-
aged properly. The solvent evaporation tech-
niques used in this method are amenable  to
solvent recovery, and it is recommended that
the  laboratory  recover solvents   wherever
feasible.
  19.2  Standards should be prepared in vol-
umes consistent with laboratory use to mini-
mize disposal of standards.

          20.0  Waste Management

  20.1  It is the laboratory's responsibility to
comply with all federal, state, and local reg-
ulations governing waste management, par-
ticularly  the hazardous waste identification
rules and land disposal restrictions, and  to
protect the air, water,  and land  by  mini-
mizing  and  controlling  all  releases   from
fume hoods and bench operations.  Compli-
ance is also required with any sewage dis-
charge permits and regulations.
  20.2  Samples containing HC1 to pH <2 are
hazardous and must be neutralized before
being poured down a drain or must be han-
dled as hazardous waste.
  20.3  The CDDs/CDPs decompose above 800
°C. Low-level waste such as absorbent paper,
tissues, animal remains, and plastic gloves
may be burned in an appropriate incinerator.
Gross  quantities  (milligrams)  should be
packaged  securely and  disposed  of through
commercial or  governmental channels  that
are  capable  of handling  extremely  toxic
wastes.
  20.4  Liquid or soluble waste should be dis-
solved in methanol or ethanol and irradiated
with  ultraviolet  light  with a wavelength
shorter than 290 nm for several days. Use F40
BL  or equivalent  lamps.  Analyze  liquid
wastes, and dispose of the solutions when the
CDDs/CDPs can no longer be detected.
  20.5  For further  information on waste
management, consult "The Waste  Manage-
ment Manual for Laboratory Personnel" and
"Less is Better—Laboratory Chemical Man-
agement  for Waste  Reduction," available
from the  American Chemical  Society's De-
partment   of  Government  Relations  and
Science Policy, 1155 16th Street N.W., Wash-
ington, D.C. 20036.

          21.0  Method Performance

  Method   performance  was  validated  and
performance  specifications  were developed
using data from EPA's international inter-
laboratory validation study (References 30-
31) and the EPA/paper industry  Long-Term
Variability Study  of  discharges from the
pulp and paper industry (58 FR 66078).

             22.0  References

  1. Tondeur, Yves.  "Method 8290: Analytical
Procedures and Quality Assurance for Multi-
media Analysis of Polychlorinated  Dibenzo-
p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans by High Resolu-
tion  Gas  Chromatography/High  Resolution
Mass  Spectrometry,"  USEPA  EMSL,  Las
Vegas, Nevada, June 1987.
  2. "Measurement of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorinated
Dibenzo-p-dioxin    (TCDD)   and    2,3,7,8-
Tetrachlorinated Dibenzofuran  (TCDF)  in
Pulp,   Sludges,   Process   Samples  and
Wastewaters  from  Pulp and  Paper  Mills,"
Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435,
June 1988.
  3. "NCASI Procedures for the Preparation
and  Isomer Specific  Analysis  of Pulp and
Paper Industry Samples for 2,3,7,8-TCDD and
2,3,7,8-TCDF," National Council of the Paper
Industry for Air and Stream Improvement
Inc.,  260  Madison Avenue,  New York, NY
10016, Technical Bulletin No. 551, Pre-Release
Copy, July 1988.
  4. "Analytical  Procedures and Quality As-
surance  Plan  for   the  Determination  of
PCDD/PCDF  in  Fish,"  USEPA,  Environ-
mental Research Laboratory, 6201  Congdon
Boulevard, Duluth, MN 55804, April 1988.
  5.  Tondeur, Yves. "Proposed GC/MS Meth-
odology  for  the Analysis  of  PCDDs  and
                                         266

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
PCDPs in Special Analytical  Services Sam-
ples,"  Triangle  Laboratories,  Inc.,  801-10
Capitola Dr,  Research Triangle  Park,  NC
27713,  January  1988; updated by personal
communication September 1988.
  6. Lamparski, L.L. and Nestrick, T.J. "De-
termination of Tetra-,  Hexa-, Hepta-,  and
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Isomers in Par-
tioulate Samples at Parts per Trillion Lev-
els," Analytical Chemistry, 52: 2045-2054, 1980.
  7.  Lamparski,  L.L.  and  Nestrick,  T.J.
"Novel Extraction Device for the Determina-
tion   of   Chlorinated    Dibenzo-p-dioxins
(PCDDs) and  Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) in Mat-
rices Containing Water," Chemosphere, 19:27-
31, 1989.
  8. Patterson, D.G., et. al. "Control of Inter-
ferences in the Analysis of Human Adipose
Tissue   for   2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin," Environmental Toxicological Chem-
istry, 5:355-360, 1986.
  9.  Stanley,  John S. and Sack, Thomas M.
"Protocol   for  the  Analysis   of  2,3,7,8-
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin by High Resolu-
tion Gas  Chromatography/High  Resolution
Mass Spectrometry,"  USEPA EMSL,  Las
Vegas, Nevada 89114, EPA 600/4-86-004, Janu-
ary 1986.
  10. "Working with Carcinogens,"  Depart-
ment of Health, Education, & Welfare, Public
Health Service, Centers for Disease Control,
NIOSH,  Publication 77-206,  August  1977,
NTIS PB-277256.
  11. "OSHA  Safety and Health Standards,
General Industry," OSHA 2206,  29 CFR 1910.
  12. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," ACS Committee on Chemical Safety,
1979.
  13. "Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water and Wastewater," 18th edition  and
later revisions, American Public Health As-
sociation, 1015 15th St, N.W., Washington, DC
20005, 1-35: Section 1090 (Safety), 1992.
  14. "Method 613—2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-dioxin," 40  CFR 136 (49 FR 43234), October
26,1984, Section 4.1.
  15. Provost, L.P. and Elder, R.S. "Interpre-
tation of Percent Recovery Data," American
Laboratory, 15: 56-83, 1983.
  16.  "Standard   Practice  for   Sampling
Water," ASTM Annual Book  of Standards,
ASTM,  1916 Race Street,  Philadelphia,  PA
19103-1187, 1980.
  17. "Methods 330.4 and 330.5 for Total Resid-
ual  Chlorine," USEPA,  EMSL, Cincinnati,
OH 45268, EPA 600/4-79-020, March 1979.
  18. "Handbook of Analytical Quality Con-
trol  in Water and Wastewater Laboratories,"
USEPA EMSL, Cincinnati, OH  45268,  EPA-
600/4-79-019, March 1979.
  19. Williams, Rick. Letter to Bill Telliard,
June 4, 1993, available from the EPA Sample
Control Center operated by DynCorp Viar,
Inc., 300 N Lee St, Alexandria, VA 22314, 703-
519-1140.
  20. Barkowski,  Sarah. Fax  to  Sue Price,
August 6, 1992, available from  the EPA Sam-
ple  Control  Center operated by  DynCorp
Viar, Inc., 300 N Lee St, Alexandria VA 22314,
703-519-1140.
  21. "Analysis of Multi-media,  Multi-con-
centration Samples for Dioxins and Furans,
PCDD/PCDF Analyses Data  Package",  Nar-
rative for Episode 4419, MRI Project No. 3091-
A, op.cit. February 12, 1993,  Available  from
the EPA Sample Control Center operated by
DynCorp Viar  Inc, 300  N Lee  St, Alexandria,
VA 22314 (703-519-1140).
  22. "Analytical Procedures and Quality As-
surance  Plan  for the  Determination  of
PCDD/PCDF in  Fish",  U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency, Environmental Research
Laboratory, Duluth,  MN 55804, EPA/600/3-90/
022, March 1990.
  23. Afghan, B.K., Carron, J., Goulden,  P.D.,
Lawrence, J., Leger, D., Onuska,  F., Sherry,
J., and Wilkenson, R.J., "Recent Advances in
Ultratrace Analysis of Dioxins and Related
Halogenated Hydrocarbons",  Can  J. Chem.,
65: 1086-1097, 1987.
  24. Sherry, J.P. and Tse, H.  "A  Procedure
for the  Determination of Polychlorinated
Dibenzo-p-dioxins in Fish", Chemosphere, 20:
865-872, 1990.
  25. "Preliminary Fish Tissue Study", Re-
sults of Episode 4419, available from the EPA
Sample Control Center operated by DynCorp
Viar, Inc., 300 N Lee St, Alexandria, VA
22314, 703-519-1140.
  26. Nestrick, Terry  L. DOW Chemical Co.,
personal     communication    with    D.R.
Rushneck, April  8,  1993.   Details available
from the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection
Agency Sample Control Center operated by
DynCorp Viar  Inc, 300  N Lee  St, Alexandria,
VA 22314, 703-519-1140.
  27. Barnstadt, Michael. "Big Fish Column",
Triangle Laboratories of RTF, Inc., SOP 129-
90, 27 March 27, 1992.
  28.  "Determination  of  Polychlorinated
Dibenzo-p-Dioxins (PCDD) and Dibenzofurans
(PCDF)  in  Environmental  Samples Using
EPA Method  1613", Chemical  Sciences De-
partment,  Midwest Research Institute, 425
Volker Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 44110-
2299, Standard Operating Procedure  No. CS-
153, January 15, 1992.
  29. Ryan,  John J.  Raymonde Lizotte and
William  H. Newsome, J. Chromatog. 303
(1984) 351-360.
  30. Telliard, William A., McCarty, Harry
B.,  and  Riddick, Lynn S. "Results of the
Interlaboratory Validation Study of USEPA
Method  1613  for  the  Analysis   of Tetra-
through Octachlorinated Dioxins and Furans
by  Isotope Dilution GC/MS," Chemosphere,
27, 41-46 (1993).
  31. "Results  of the International Interlab-
oratory Validation Study  of  USEPA Method
1613", October  1994, available from the  EPA
Sample Control Center operated by DynCorp
Viar, Inc., 300 N Lee St, Alexandria, VA
22314, 703-519-1140.
          23.0  Tables and Figures
                                         267

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
TABLE 1—CHLORINATED  DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS AND FURANS DETERMINED BY ISOTOPE  DILUTION AND
  INTERNAL STANDARD  HIGH  RESOLUTION GAS  CHROMATOGRAPHY  (HRGC)/HiGH RESOLUTION
  MASS SPECTROMETRY  (HRMS)
CDDs/CDFs1
237 8-TCDD

Total TCDD 	
237 8-TCDF
Total-TCDF 	
12,378-PeCDD 	
Total-PeCDD
1237 8-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF 	
Total-PeCDF
12347 8-HxCDD
12367 8-HxCDD
12378 9-HxCDD
Total-HxCDD 	
12347 8-HxCDF
12367 8-HxCDF ....
1 2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 	
234678-HxCDF 	
Total-HxCDF
1 23 4 67 8-HpCDD
Total-HpCDD
123467 8-HpCDF 	
123478 9-HpCDF
Total-HpCDF 	
OCDD
OCDF 	
CAS registry
1746-01-6

41903-57-5
51207-31-9
55722-27-5
40321-76-4
36088-22-9
57117-41-6
57117-31-4
30402-15-4
39227-28-6
57653-85-7
19408-74-3
34465-46-8
70648-26-9
57117-44-9
72918-21-9
60851-34-5
55684-94-1
35822-46-9
37871-00-4
67562-39-4
55673-89-7
38998-75-3
3268-87-9
39001-02-0
Labeled analog
'3Ci2-2 3 7 8-TCDD
"CI4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 	

13Ci2-2 3 7 8-TCDF

"Ci2-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 	

13CT2-1 2 3 7,8-PeCDF
'3C,2-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF . 	

"CT2-1 2347 8-HxCDD
"C|2-1 2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 	
13C|2-1 2 3 7,8,9-HxCDD

"Ci2-1 2 3 4,7,8-HxCDF
I3C|2-1 2 3 6,7,8-HxCDF 	
l3Ci2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 	
'3Ci2-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF . 	

I3C|2-1 23467 8-HpCDD

l3C,2-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 	
l3Ci2-1 2 3 4,7,8 9-HpCDF

I3C12-OCDD . . .
Not used.
CAS registry
76523-40-5
85508-50-5

89059-46-1

109719-79-1

109719-77-9
116843-02-8

109719-80-4
109719-81-5
109719-82-6

114423-98-2
116843-03-9
116843-04-0
116843-05-1

109719-83-7

109719-84-8
109719-94-0

114423-97-1

  1 Chlonnated dibenzo-p-dioxins and chlorinated dibenzofurans.
   TCDD = Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxm
   TCDF = Tetrachlorodibenzofuran.
   PeCDD = Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxm
   PeCDF = Pentachlorodjbenzofuran.
   HxCDD = Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
   HxCDF = Hexachlorodibenzofuran.
   HpCDD = Heptaohlorodibenzo-p-dioxm.
   HpCDF = Heptachlorodibenzofuran
   OCDD = Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
   OCDF = Octachlorodibenzofuran


TABLE 2—RETENTION TIME REFERENCES, QUANTITATION REFERENCES, RELATIVE RETENTION TIMES,

                          AND MINIMUM LEVELS FOR CDDS AND DCFS
CDD/CDF
Retention time and quantitation
reference
Relative reten-
tion time
Minimum level 1
Water
(P9/L:
ppq)
Solid (no/
kg, pptl
Extract
(PQ/uL,
ppb)
                  Compounds using »C12-1,2,3,4-TCDD as the Injection Internal Standard
2,3,7,8-TCDF 	
2,3,7,8-TCDD 	
1237 8-Pe
2347 8-PeCDF
1237 8-PeCDD 	
3Ci2-2378-TCDF
3 C ,2-2 3 7 8-TCDD
3C]2-2378-TCDD
3 Ci2-1 2378-PeCDF 	
3Ci2-23478-PeCDF
3C,2-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 	
3Ci2-2,3,7,8-TCDF 	
3C,2-2,3,7,8-TCDD 	
3CT2-1 2378-PeCDF
3Ci2-23478-PeCDF
3Ci2-1,2378-PeCDD 	
3C|2-1 234-TCDD
1C12-1,2,34-TCDD 	
3Ci2-1 234-TCDD .
3Ci2-1.2,3,4-TCDD 	
'Ci2-1 234-TCDD
3C,2-1,2,3,4-TCDD 	
0.999-1 003
0.999-1 002
0 999-1 002
0.999-1 002
0.999-1 002
0.923-1 103
0.976-1.043
0.989-1 052
1.000-1 425
1.001-1 526
1.000-1.567
10
10
50
50
50






1
1
5
5
5






05
0.5
25
25
25






                 Compounds using "C12-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD as the Injection Internal Standard
1 2,3 4 7 8-HxCDF 	
123678-HxCDF 	
12378 9-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 	
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD .
12367 8-HxCDD .. . .
12378 9-HxCDD
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-HDCDF 	
3C]2-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF . .
3C,2-1 2367,8-HxCDF
1Ci2-1 237 8,9-HxCDF
1C,2-2,3A6,7,8-HxCDF ...
3Ci2-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD .
3C]2-1 2367,8-HxCDD
(2)
13C,,-1,2.3.4.6.7,8-HDCDF ..
0999-1.001
0.997-1 005
0 999-1 001
0999-1.001
0.999-1.001
0 998-1 004
1.000-1 019
0 999-1 001
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
25
2.5
25
2.5
2.5
2.5
25
25
                                            268

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
TABLE 2—RETENTION TIME REFERENCES, QUANTITATION REFERENCES, RELATIVE RETENTION TIMES,
                    AND MINIMUM LEVELS FOR CDDS AND DCFS—Continued
CDD/CDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 	
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 	
OCDF 	 	
OCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,-HxCDF ....
3Cl21,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 	
3C,22,3,4,6,7,8,-HxCDF ....
3C,21,2,3,4,7,8,-HxCDF 	
3C,21,2,3,6,7,8,-HxCDF 	
'C,2l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF . ...
3Ci21 234789-HxCDF 	
3C121,2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF . . .
3C,2OCDD 	
Retention time and quantitation
reference
3 CI2-1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
3C,2-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD .. . .
3Ci2-OCDD 	
3C,2-OCDD
3C,2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD 	
3C,2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD 	
3Ci2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD 	
3Ci2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD 	
iC,2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD
3C,2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD 	
3Cl2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD 	
3C,2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD
3C,2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HpCDD
Relative reten-
tion time
0.999-1 001
0 999-1 001
0 999-1 001
0 999-1 001
0 949-0 975
0 977-1 047
0 959-1 021
0977-1.000
0981-1.003
1 043-1 085
1 057-1 151
1.086-1.110
1.032-1 311
Minimum level '
Water
(pg/L;
ppq)
50
50
100
100


Solid (ng/
kg, ppt)
5
5
10
10




Extract
(pg/RL,
ppb)
25
25
5.0
50

  1 The Minimum Level (ML) for each analyte is defined as the level at which the entire analytical system must give a recogniz-
able signal and acceptable calibration point It is equivalent to tne concentration of the lowest calibration standard, assuming that
all method-specified sample weights, volumes, and cleanup procedures have been employed
  2The retention time reference for 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD is '3Ci2-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD, and  1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD is quantified using
the averaged responses for l3Cl2-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD and >3Ci2-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD.


   TABLE 3—CONCENTRATION OF STOCK AND SPIKING SOLUTIONS CONTAINING CDDS/CDFS AND

                                      LABELED COMPOUNDS
CDD/CDF
237 8-TCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF 	 	
1237 8-PeCDD
1, 2,3,7 8-PeCDF 	 	
2347 8-PeCDF
1 ,2,3,4 7 8-HxCDD 	 	
1 ,2,3,6 7 8-HxCDD
12378 9-HxCDD
1 ,2,3,4 7 8-HxCDF 	 	
1 ,2,3,6 7 8-HxCDF
12378 9-HxCDF
2,3,4,6, 7,8-HxCDF 	 	
1 ,2,3,4 6 7 8-HpCDD
123467 8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4 7 8,9-HpCDF 	 	
OCDD ... 	
OCDF 	
13Ci2-2 3 7 8-TCDD 	 	
'3Ci2-2 3 7 8-TCDF
I3C,2-1 237 8-PeCDD
i3C|2-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF .... 	
13Cn-23478-PeCDF 	
'3Ci2-1 2347 8-HxCDD
'3Ci2-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 	 	
'3C,2-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 	 	
I3C|2-1 2367 8-HxCDF
"3Ci2-1 2 3 7 8 9-HxCDF 	 . .
'3Ci2-2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 	
T3C,2-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 	 	
'3Ci2-1 23467 8-HpCDF
I3C,2-1 23478 9-HpCDF .. .
13Ci2-OCDD 	
Cleanup Standard 5
37CI4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 	
Internal Standards6
I3C,2-1 2 3 4-TCDD ...
'3C,2-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 	
Labeled com-
pound stock
solution 1
(ng/mL)

















100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
200
08
200
200
Labeled
compound
spiking solu-
tion2
(ng/mL)

















2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4


PAR stock
solution 3
(ng/mL)
40
40
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
400
400














PAR spiking
solution4
(ng/mL)
08
08
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
8
8














  1 Section 7 10—prepared in nonane and diluted to prepare spiking solution
  2 Section 7 10 3—prepared in acetone from stock solution daily.
                                              269

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1613
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 3 Section 7 9—prepared in nonane and diluted to prepare spiking solution.
 4 Section 7 14—prepared in acetone from stock solution daily.
 5 Section 7 11—prepared in nonane and added to extract pnor to cleanup
 6 Section 7 12—prepared in nonane and added to the concentrated extract immediately prior to injection into the GC (Section
142)

   TABLE 4—CONCENTRATION OF CDDS/CDFS IN CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION VERIFICATION
                                SOLUTIONS1 (SECTION 15.3)

237 8-TCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF 	 	
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 	
1237 8-PeCDF
23478-PeCDF 	
123 4 7 8-HxCDD
123678-HxCDD 	
12378 9-HxCDD
12347 8-HxCDF 	
12367 8-HxCDF
123789-HxCDF 	
23467 8-HxCOF
1 2 3,4 6 7 8-HpCDD 	
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 	
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 	 	
OCDD 	
OCDF 	
'Ci2-2378-TCDD
3Ci2-2,3,7,8-TCDF 	
3Cu-1 2378-PeCDD 	
'Ci2-PeCDF
TCi2-2,3,4,7,S-PeCDF 	
3 C|2-1 2 3 4 7 8-HxCDD
3C,2-1 2,3,6 7 8-HxCDD 	
3 Ci-i-1 2 3 4 7 8-HxCDF
3CT2-1 23678-HxCDF 	
3C|2-1 2378 9-HxCDF .
3C,2-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 	
3 C|2-1 2 3 4 6 7 8-HpCDF
3Cn-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Hp CDF 	 	
3Ci2-OCDD 	
Cleanup Standard:
"C14-2,3,7,8-TCDD 	
Internal Standards:
'3Ci2-1 234-TCDD
i'C,,-1.2.3.7.8.9-HxCDD .. 	
CDD/CDF
05
05
2.5
25
2.5
25
2.5
25
2.5
25
2.5
25
2.5
2.5
2.5
5.0
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
200
05
100
100
CS2
(ng/mL)
2
2
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
20
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
200
2
100
100
CS3
(ng/mL)
10
10
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
200
10
100
100
CS4
(ng/mL)
40
40
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
400
400
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
200
40
100
100
css
(ng/mL)
200
200
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2000
2000
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
200
200
100
100
    TABLE 5—GC RETENTION TIME WINDOW DEFINING SOLUTION AND ISOMER SPECIFICITY TEST
                                 STANDARD (SECTION 7.15)

                        DB-5 column GG retention-time window defining solution
CDD/CDF
TCDF
TCDD 	
PeCDF
PeCDD 	 	
HxCDF 	 	
HxCDD 	
HpCDF 	
HpCDD 	
First eluted
1368- 	
1,3,6,8- 	
13468-
1,2,4,7,9- 	
1,2,3,4,6,8- 	
1,2,4,6,7,9- 	 	
1,2,3,4,6,7,8- 	
1,2,3,4,6,7,9- 	
Last eluted
1289-
1,2,8,9-
12389-
1,2,3,8,9-
1,2,3,4,8,9-
1,2,3,4,6,7-
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
                      DB-5 Column TCDD Specificity Test Standard
                                   1,2,3,7=1,2,3,8-TCDD
                                      2,3,7,8-TCDD.
                                      1,2,3,9-TCDD
                 DB-225 Column TCDF Isomer Specificity Test Standard
                                      2,3,4,7-TCDF
                                      2,3,7,8-TCDF
                                      1,2,3,9-TCDF
                                           270

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
TABLE 6—ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS WHEN ALL CDDS/CDFS ARE TESTED 1
CDD/CDF
2,3,7,8-TCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF . . ... 	
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD . 	
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF ... ... ....
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 	
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ...
1 ,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 	
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD ... . . 	
12347 8-HxCDF
1 ,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 	
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 	
23467 8-HxCDF 	
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 	
1 2 3 4 6 7 8-HpCDF 	
123478 9-HpCDF
OCDD . . . 	
OCDF 	 	
nC,2-2,3,7,8-TCDD . 	
"Ci2-2378-TCDF
"Ci2-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 	
i'C,2-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 	
"Ci2-23478-PeCDF
l3Ci2-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 	
"C12-1 2367 8-HxCDD
i-'C,2-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 	
l3Ci2-1 2367 8-HxCDF 	
nCi2-1 2378 9-HxCDF
"C 12-2 34678 -HxCDF 	
l1C,2-1,2,34,6,7,8-HpCDD 	
I3C,2-1 234678-HpCDF 	
'3C,2-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 	
'K:,2-OCDD . . 	
"CL-2.3.7.8-TCDD 	
Test cone.
(ng/mL)
10
10
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
200
10
IPR"
s
(ng/mL)
28
20
75
7.5
8.6
9.4
77
11 1
87
6.7
64
7.4
77
6.3
8.1
19
27
37
35
39
34
38
41
38
43
35
40
37
35
41
40
95
3.6
X
(ng/mL)
83-12.9
87-137
38-66
43-62
36-75
39-76
42-62
37-71
41-59
46-60
42-61
37-74
38-65
45-56
43-63
89-127
74-146
28-134
31-113
27-184
27-156
16-279
29-147
34-122
27-152
30-122
24-157
29-136
34-129
32-110
28-141
41-276
3.9-15.4
OPR
(ng/mL)
67-15.8
75-158
35-71
40-67
34-80
35-82
38-67
32-81
36-67
42-65
39-65
35-78
35-70
41-61
39-69
78-144
63-170
20-175
22-152
21-227
21-192
13-328
21-193
25-163
19-202
21-159
17-205
22-176
26-166
21-158
20-186
26-397
31-191
VER
(ng/mL)
78-129
84-12.0
39-65
41-60
41-61
39-64
39-64
41-61
45-56
44-57
45-56
44-57
43-58
45-55
43-58
79-126
63-159
82-121
71-140
62-160
76-130
77-130
85-117
85-118
76-131
70-143
74-135
73-137
72-138
78-129
77-129
96-415
79-127
 1 All specifications are given as concentration in the final extract, assuming a 20 ^L volume
 2 s = standard deviation of the concentration
 3X = average concentration.


TABLE 6A—ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS WHEN ONLY TETRA COMPOUNDS ARE

                                       TESTED[
CDD/CDF
2,3,7,8-TCDD .. . 	
2,3,7,8-TCDF .. 	
13C,2-2,3,7,8-TCDD 	
l3C,2-2,3,7,8-TCDF . 	
17C,4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 	
Test Cone
(ng/mL)
10
10
100
100
10
IPR"
s (ng/mL)
27
20
35
34
34
X (ng/mL)
87-124
91-131
32-115
35-99
45-134
OPR
(ng/mL)
73146
80-147
25-141
26-126
37-158
VER
(ng/mL)
82-123
86-11 6
85-117
76-131
83-121
 i All specifications are given as concentration in the final extract, assuming a 20 uL volume
 2s = standard deviation of the concentration
 1X = average concentration


  TABLE 7—LABELED COMPOUNDS  RECOVERY IN SAMPLES WHEN ALL CDDS/CDFS ARE TESTED
Compound
'^12-2,3,7,8^000 	
"C,2-2,3,7,8-TCDF . . . . 	
i3C,2-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
]3Ci2-1 237 8-PeCDF
"Ci2-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 	 . . 	
"C,2-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD ...
i3Ci2-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 	 ...
»C,2-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF . .. 	
nC,,-1.2.3,6,7,8-HxCDF .. . . 	
Test cone
(ng/mL)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Labeled compound
recovery
(ng/mL) '
25-164
24-169
25-181
24-185
21-178
32-141
28-130
26-152
26-123
(%)
25-164
24-169
25-181
24-185
21-178
32-141
28-130
26-152
26-123
                                         271

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 TABLE 7—LABELED COMPOUNDS RECOVERY IN SAMPLES WHEN ALL CDDS/CDFS ARE TESTED—
                                     Continued
Compound
"Ci2-1, 2,3,7,8 9-HxCDF 	 	
'3C ,2-2 3 4 6 7 8-HxCDF
"Ci2-1, 2,3,4,6 7 8-HpCDD .. 	
l3Ci2-1, 2,3,4,6 7 8-HpCDF 	 	
i'C]2-1 23478 9-HpCDF
"Ci2-OCDD
"CI4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 	 	 	
Test cone
(ng/mL)
100
100
100
100
100
200
10
Labeled compound
recovery
(ng/mL) '
29-147
28-136
23-140
28-143
26-138
34-313
35-197
(%)
29-147
28-136
23-140
28-143
26-138
17-157
35-197
 i Specification given as concentration in the final extract, assuming a 20-jiL volume

  TABLE ?A—LABELED COMPOUND RECOVERY IN SAMPLES WHEN ONLY TETRA COMPOUNDS ARE
                                      TESTED
Compound
"C12-2 3 7 8-TCDD 	
i'C,2-2,3,7,8-TCDF 	 	
"CI4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 	 	 	
Test cone
(ng/mL)
100
100
10
Labeled compound
recovery
(ng/mL) '
31-137
29-140
42-164
(%)
31-137
29-140
42-164
 1 Specification given as concentration in the final extract, assuming a 20 nL volume

 TABLE 8—DESCRIPTORS, EXACT M/Z's, M/Z TYPES, AND ELEMENTAL COMPOSITIONS OF THE CDDs
                                     AND CDFs
Descriptor
1





2 	





3







4 ..




Exact M/Z1
292 9825
303 9016
305 8987
3159419
317 9389
319.8965
321 8936
3278847
330 9792
331 9368
333 9339
375 8364
339 8597
341 8567
351 9000
353 8970
354 9792
355 8546
357 8516
367 8949
3698919
409 7974
373 8208
3758178
383 8639
385 8610
389 81 57
391 8127
392 9760
401 8559
403 8529
430 9729
445 7555
407 7818
409 7789
4178253
41 9 8220
423 7766
425 7737
M/Z type
Lock
M
M-2
M
M-2
M
M=2
M
QC
M
M-2
M=2
M=2
M-4
M-2
M=4
Lock
M=2
M-4
M=2
M-4
M-2
M-2
M-4
M
M-2
M-2
M-4
Lock
M-2
M-4
QC
M=4
M=2
M-4
M
M=2
M-2
M-4
Elemental composition
C7Fn 	
Ci2H43!CI4O 	
C]2H4MCl3:>7CIO
"C,2H435Cl4O . . 	
nCi2H43'Cl337CIO
C.jH^'CUOj 	
C,2H43'Cl337CIO2 	
C,2H437CI4Cs .. 	
C,F,3 	
'3Ci2H435CI4O2
l3Ci2H435Cl337CIC>2 ... .
C12H43!CI537CIO 	
C,2H1"CI43-'CIO 	
Ci2H1'3CM7Cl2O
"Ci2Hi35Cl437CIO
'3C,2H,35CI,'7CI2O 	
C9F,, .... 	
C,2Hv"CI437CIO2 	
C]2H33!Cl337CI2O2
'3Cl2H333Ct,"CIO2 	
'3Cl2Hl3sCl337Cl2O2
Ci2H335CI637CIO 	
Ci2H235CI5'7CIO
C]2H235CI437Cl2O 	
13C,2H235CI6O 	
I3C,2H23!CI537CIO
C]2H235CI537CIO2
C|2H23'CI437CI2O2
C,F15 	
'3Cl2H23!C!537CIO2 	
l3Ci2H235CI437CI2O2
C9F17 	
C,2H2MCI637Cl2O 	
C12H3'C!637CIO .. 	
Ci2H35CI337Cl2O
I3C|2H35CI7O
I3C|2H3!CI637CIO 	
Cl2H33CI637CIO2 	
C,2H35CI;37Cl2O2 	
Substance2
PFK
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF 3
TCDF3
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD"
PFK
TCDD3
TCDD3
HxCDPE
PeCDF
PeCDF
PeCDF
PeCDF3
PFK
PeCDD
PeCDD
PeCDD3
PeCDD3
HpCDPE
HxCDF
HxCDF
HxCDF3
HxCDF3
HxCDD
HxCDD
PFK
HxCDD3
HxCDD3
PFK
OCDPE
HpCDF
HpCDF
HpCDF3
HpCDF3
HpCDD
HpCDD
                                        272

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A,  Meth. 1613
 TABLE 8—DESCRIPTORS, EXACT M/Z's, M/Z TYPES, AND ELEMENTAL COMPOSITIONS OF THE CDDs
                                     AND CDFs—Continued
Descriptor



5 	



Exact M/Z1
430 9729
435 81 69
437 81 40
479 71 65
441.7428
442 9728
443 7399
457 7377
459 7348
469 7779
471 7750
5136775
M/Z type
Lock
M-2
M-4
M-4
M=2
Lock
M=4
M-2
M=4
M=2
M=4
M=4
Elemental composition
C,F,7 	 	
13Cl2H35CI637CIO2
l3CnH35CI537CI2Oi
Ci2H33CI717CI2O 	 	
Ci2'5CI717CIO 	
C,oF,7 	
C,235CI637CI20 	
Ci215CI737CIO2 . 	
Ci2«CI6"CI2O2 .
nCi235CI737CIO2 	
I3C,2"CI<,37CI2O2 	
Ci2«CI837CI2O .. 	
Substance2
PFK
HpCOD 3
HpCDD 3
NCDPE
OCDF
PFK
OCDF
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD3
OCDD3
DCDPE
  1 Nuclidic masses used.
   H = 1 007825.
   O= 15994915
   C = 12.00000.
   3SCI = 34.968853
   13C = 13 003355.
   37CI = 36 965903
   F= 18.9984
  2 TCDD = Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
   PeCDD = Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxm.
   HxCDD = Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxm
   HpCDD = Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
   OCDD = Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
   HxCDPE = Hexachlorodiphenyl ether.
   OCDPE = Octachlorodiphenyl ether.
   OCOPE = Decachlorodiphenyl ether
   TCDF = Tetrachlorodibenzofuran.
   PeCDF = Pentachlorodibenzofuran.
   HxCDF = Hexachlorodibenzofuran.
   HpCDF = Heptachlorodibenzofuran
   OCDF = Octachlorodibenzofuran.
   HpCDPE = Heptachlorodiphenyl ether
   NCDPE = Nonachlorodiphenyl ether.
   PFK = Perfluorokerosene
  3 Labeled compound.
  "There is only one m/z for 37CI4-2,3,7,8,-TCDD (cleanup standard).


                 TABLE 9—THEORETICAL ION ABUNDANCE RATIOS AND QC LIMITS
Number of chlorine atoms
42
5
6 	 	
63 	
7
7" ..
8 ... 	
M/Z's forming ratio
M/(M-2)
(M=2)/(M=4) 	
(M=2)/(M=4)
M/(M=2) 	
(M=2)/(M=4)
M/(M=2) . 	
(M-2V(M-4) 	
Theoretical
ratio
0.77
1.55
1.24
0.51
1.05
0.44
0.89
QC limit1
Lower
0.65
1 32
1 05
0.43
088
037
076
Upper
089
1 78
1 43
0.59
1 20
051
1.02
  1 QC limits represent ±15% windows around the theoretical ion abundance ratios.
  2 Does not apply to 37Cl4-2,3,7,8-TCDD (cleanup standard)
  3 Used for '3C,2-HxCDF only
  "Used for T3C,2-HpCDF only.


     TABLE 10—SUGGESTED SAMPLE QUANTITIES To BE EXTRACTED FOR VARIOUS MATRICES1
Sample Matrix2
Single-phase-
Aqueous 	
Solid


Tissue ....
Example
Dnnking water . . .
Groundwater
Treated wastewater
Compost
Ash
Waste solvent
Waste oil
Organic polymer
Fish 	
Human adipose
Percent solids
<1
>20

<1

Phase
(3) 	
Solid


Organic 	
Quantity ex-
tracted
1000 mL.
10 a

10 a
10 g.
                                              273

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    TABLE 10—SUGGESTED SAMPLE QUANTITIES To BE EXTRACTED FOR VARIOUS MATRICES1—
                                              Continued
Sample Matrix2
Multi-phase*
Liquid/Solid.
Aqueous/Sotid 	

Liquid/Liquid:
Aqueous/organic 	
Aqueous/organic/
solid
Example
Wet soil 	
Untreated effluent
Digested municipal sludge
Filter cake
Paper pulp

In-process effluent 	
Untreated effluent
Untreated effluent
Drum waste
Percent solids
1-30
1-100

<1
>1
Phase
Solid 	 	
Both . .. .

Organic 	
Organic and solid .
Quantity ex-
tracted
10g
10 g

10 g.
10g
  'The quantity of sample to be extracted is adjusted to provide 10 g of solids (dry weight). One liter of aqueous samples con-
taining 1% solids will contain 10 g of solids For aqueous samples containing greater than 1% solids, a lesser volume is used so
that 10 g of solids (dry weight) will be extracted.
  2 The sample matrix may be amorphous for some samples In general, when the CDDs/CDFs are in contact with a multiphase
system in which one of the phases is water, they will be preferentially dispersed in or adsorbed on the alternate phase because
of their low solubility in water
  3 Aqueous samples are filtered after spiking with the labeled compounds The filtrate and the materials trapped on the filter are
extracted separately, and the extracts are combined for cleanup and analysis
                                                  274

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth.  1613


808 Attraction
of Mr MT
$123
AND


S«p.tumel
admdfanof
ftato per {12.1
                                                                Conc*nM*per
                                                                §12.6.1,512.6.2
                                                                  Of§12.6.3
    • Tla K-0 conMrtratkn procedure h J1163 on b*
     UMdltfMMbrbatilsf«Jbya9l«™gen*r*>r.
                                                                  Tnmlar
                                                                  Imugh
                                                                 sodumuM*
                                                                 RMcncwm*
                                                                 pwf 12A1.
                                                                   Mlcro-
                                                                  P«rt12.7
                                                                Extras dew-up
                                                                    113.2-
                                                                     §13.8
                    Figure 1. Flow Chart for Analysis of Aqueous and Solid Samples
                                           275

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
   • Th» K-0 conc*ntrtlon preadun In f 12.63
        UN
    gmtnlor.
                     Figure 2. Flow Chart for Analysis of MulthPhase Samples
                                         276

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             Pt. 136, App. A,Meth. 1613
                       SoxhM Extraction
                                                                HCIDigMtian
                                         OR
             MMrim%lpHspir
                 $12.4.1.9
      Column dienup    I
Batch dump
Rtdfaotottdapk*
cleanup ltd



Tmahylhiu
l*i,S04


ConcmMtpw
{124 -$12.7





1


B8d$S?'"f
1
TransftrthiuNajSO,
1
OonctnMMp>r
§12.6 -§12.7

                        Figure 3. Flow Chart for Analysis of Tissue Samples
                                        277

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
                   • 1000




                   •750



                    500
                                            90-mmGMF 150 Filter
                                    1-Liter Suction Rask
                  Rgure 4. Solid-Phase Extraction Apparatus
                                        278

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
            Figure 5. Soxhtet/Dean-Stark Extractor
                                    279
     203-160  D-10

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth.  1613
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
      38  DBS Column
  100-1
                 24:00
     Figure 6.  Isomer-Specific Separation of 2,3,7,8-TCDD on DB-5 Column
                                                                           5SX87-03
                                       280

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
               6-May-88      Sir. VoKage705      Sys: OB5US
    Sample 11njection 1        Group 1     Mass 305.8987
    Text Column Performance
  100
                                       2,3,4,8-TCDF
   40
   20-
                          2,3,4,7-TCDF
             Norm: 3466
                                                     1,2,3,9-TCDF
                                         III
     16:10  16:20 16:30  16:40 16:50  17:00 17:10  172ff 17:30  17:40 17:40  18:00
                            RttonoonTmM (minutes)
  Figure 7.  Isomer-Specific Separation of 2,3,7,8-TCDF on DB-5 Column
                                                                             SNBMA
   24.0  Glossary of Definitions and Purposes
  These definitions and purposes are specific
to this  method but have been conformed to
common usage as much as possible.
  24.1 Units of  weight  and Measure  and
Their Abbreviations.
  24.1.1  Symbols:
°C—degrees Celsius
lilt—microliter
ton—micrometer
<—less than
>—greater than
%—percent
24.1.2  Alphabetical abbreviations:
amp—ampere
cm—centimeter
g—gram
h—hour
D—inside diameter
in.—inch
L—liter
M—Molecular ion
m—meter
mg—milligram
min—minute
mL—milliliter
mm—millimeter
m/z—mass-to-charge ratio
                                         281

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1613
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
N—normal; gram molecular weight of solute
   divided by hydrogen equivalent of solute,
   per liter of solution
OD—outside diameter
pg—pioogram
ppb—part-per-billion
ppm—part-per-million
ppq—part-per-quadrillion
ppt—part-per-trillion
psig—pounds-per-square inch gauge
v/v—volume per unit volume
w/v—weight per unit volume
  24.2  Definitions and Acronyms (in Alpha-
betical Order).
  Analyte—A CDD or CDF tested for by this
method. The analytes are listed in Table 1.
  Calibration  Standard  (GAL)—A  solution
prepared from a secondary standard  and/or
stock solutions and used to calibrate the re-
sponse of  the instrument with  respect to
analyte concentration.
  Calibration Verification Standard (VBB)—
The  mid-point  calibration standard  (CSS)
that  is used in to  verify calibration. See
Table 4.
  CDD—Chlorinated    Dibenzo-p-ioxin—The
isomers and congeners of tetra-through octa-
chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
  CDF—Chlorinated  Dibenzofuran—The iso-
mers  and congeners of tetra-through octa-
chlorodibenzofuran.
  CS1, CS2, CSS, CS4,  CSS—See Calibration
standards and Table 4.
  Field Blank—An aliquot of reagent water
or other reference matrix that is placed in a
sample container  in the laboratory or the
field,  and treated as  a sample in all respects,
including exposure to  sampling: site  condi-
tions, storage, preservation, and all analyt-
ical  procedures.  The purpose  of the field
blank is to determine if the field or sample
transporting procedures and  environments
have contaminated the sample.
  GC—Gas  chromatograph or  gas  chroma-
tography.
  GPC—Gel permeation chromatograph or
gel permeation chromatography.
  HPLC—High   performance   liquid   chro-
matograph or high performance liquid chro-
matography.
  HRGC—High resolution GC.
  HRMS—High resolution MS.
  IPR—Initial precision and  recovery;  four
aliquots  of the  diluted PAR standard  ana-
lyzed to establish the ability to generate ac-
ceptable  precision and accuracy. An IPR is
performed prior to the first time this method
is used and any time the method or instru-
mentation is modified.
  K-D—Kuderna-Danish concentrator;  a de-
vice used to concentrate the  analytes in a
solvent.
  Laboratory Blank—See method blank.
  Laboratory Control sample (LCS)—See on-
going precision and recovery standard (OPR).
  Laboratory  Reagent  Blank—See method
blank.
  May—This action, activity,  or procedural
step is neither required nor prohibited.
  May Not—This action, activity,  or proce-
dural step is prohibited.
  Method  Blank—An  aliquot of  reagent
water that is treated exactly as a sample in-
cluding  exposure  to  all  glassware, equip-
ment, solvents, reagents, internal standards,
and surrogates that are used with samples.
The method blank is  used  to determine if
analytes or interferences are present in the
laboratory environment, the reagents, or the
apparatus.
  Minimum Level (ML)—The level at which
the entire analytical system must give a rec-
ognizable  signal and acceptable calibration
point for the analyte. It is equivalent to the
concentration   of  the lowest  calibration
standard, assuming that all method-specified
sample weights, volumes, and cleanup proce-
dures have been employed.
  MS—Mass spectrometer or mass spectrom-
etry.
  Must—This action, activity, or procedural
step is required.
  OPR—Ongoing   precision   and  recovery
standard (OPR); a laboratory blank spiked
with known quantities of analytes. The OPR
is analyzed exactly like a sample. Its purpose
is to assure that the results produced by the
laboratory remain within the limits speci-
fied in this method for precision and recov-
ery.
  PAR—Precision  and recovery  standard;
secondary  standard  that  is  diluted  and
spiked to form the IPR and OPR.
  PFK—Perfluorokerosene;  the mixture  of
compounds used to calibrate the exact m/z
scale in the HRMS.
  Preparation Blank—See method blank.
  Primary Dilution  Standard—A  solution
containing the specified analytes that is pur-
chased or  prepared from stock solutions and
diluted as needed to prepare  calibration solu-
tions and other solutions.
  Quality  Control Check Sample  (QCS)—A
sample  containing all or a subset of the
analytes at known concentrations. The QCS
is obtained from a source external to  the lab-
oratory or is  prepared  from  a  source  of
standards different from the source  of cali-
bration standards. It is used to check labora-
tory performance with test materials pre-
pared external to the normal preparation
process.
  Reagent Water—Water demonstrated to  be
free from  the analytes of interest and poten-
tially interfering substances at the  method
detection limit for the  analyte.
  Relative Standard Deviation (RSD)—The
standard deviation times  100 divided by the
mean. Also termed "coefficient of variation."
  RF—Response factor. See Section 10.6.1.
  RR—Relative response. See Section 10.5.2.
  RSD—See relative standard deviation.
                                         282

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             PI. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
  SDS—Soxhlet/Dean-Stark extractor; an ex-
traction device applied to the extraction of
solid and semi-solid materials (Reference  7).
  Should—This action, activity,  or proce-
dural step is suggested but not required.
  SICP—Selected  ion current  profile; the
line described by the signal at an exact m/z.
  SPE—Solid-phase  extraction;  an extrac-
tion technique in which  an  analyte is ex-
tracted from an aqueous  sample by passage
over or through a material capable of revers-
ibly adsorbing the analyte.  Also termed liq-
uid-solid extraction.
  Stock Solution—A solution containing  an
analyte that is prepared using a reference
material traceable to EPA, the National In-
stitute of Science and Technology (NIST), or
a source that will  attest to the purity and
authenticity of the reference material.
  TCDD—Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.
  TCDF—Tetrachlorodibenzofuran.
  VER—See calibration  verification stand-
ard.

 METHOD 1624 REVISION B—VOLATILE ORGANIC
   COMPOUNDS BY ISOTOPE DILUTION GO/MS

          1.  Scope and Application
  1.1  This method is designed to determine
the volatile toxic organic pollutants associ-
ated with the  1976 Consent Decree and addi-
tional compounds  amenable  to purge and
trap gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
(GO/MS).
  1.2  The chemical  compounds  listed  in
table 1 may be determined in municipal and
industrial discharges by  this  method. The
methmd is designed to meet  the survey re-
quirements of Effluent Guidelines Division
(EGD)  and  the  National  Pollutants  Dis-
charge  Elimination System (NPDES) under
40 CFR 136.1 and 136.5. Any modifications of
this method,  beyond  those expressly per-
mitted, shall be considered as major modi-
fications subject to application and approval
of alternate test procedures  under 40  CFR
136.4 and 136.5.
  1.3  The detection limit of this method is
usually dependent on  the level of interfer-
ences rather than instrumental limitations.
The limits in table 2 represent the minimum
quantity that can be detected with no inter-
ferences present.
  1.4  The GC/MS  portions of this  method
are for use only by analysts experienced with
GC/MS or under the close supervision of such
qualified  persons.  Laboratories unfamiliar
with the analyses of environmental  samples
by GC/MS should run the performance tests
in reference 1 before beginning.

          2.  Summary of Method

  2.1  Stable isotopically  labeled analogs  of
the compounds of interest are added to a 5
mL water sample. The sample is purged  at
20-25 °C with an inert gas in a specially de-
signed chamber. The volatile organic com-
pounds are transferred from  the aqueous
phase into the gaseous phase where they are
passed into a sorbent column  and trapped.
After  purging  is completed,  the trap  is
backflushed and heated rapidly to desorb the
compounds into a gas chromatograph (GC).
The compounds are separated by the GC and
detected by a mass spectrometer (MS) (ref-
erences 2  and 3).  The  labeled compounds
serve to correct the variability of the analyt-
ical technique.
  2.2  Identification  of a compound  (quali-
tative  analysis) is performed by comparing
the GC retention time and the background
corrected  characteristic  spectral  masses
with those of authentic standards.
  2.3  Quantitative  analysis is performed by
GC/MS  using extracted ion  current  profile
(EICP) areas. Isotope dilution is used when
labeled compounds are available; otherwise,
an internal standard method is used.
  2.4  Quality is  assured through  reproduc-
ible calibration and testing of the purge and
trap and GC/MS systems.

     3. Contamination and Interferences

  3.1  Impurities  in the purge  gas, organic
compounds out-gassing from the  plumbing
upstream  of the trap,  and  solvent vapors in
the laboratory account for the majority of
contamination problems. The analytical sys-
tem is demonstrated  to be free from  inter-
ferences under conditions of the analysis by
analyzing  blanks initially and  with  each
sample lot (samples analyzed on the same  8
hr shift), as described in Section 8.5.
  3.2  Samples can be contaminated by diffu-
sion of volatile organic compounds (particu-
larly methylene chloride) through the bottle
seal during shipment  and storage. A  field
blank prepared from reagent water and car-
ried through the sampling and handling pro-
tocol serves as a check on such contamina-
tion.
  3.3  Contamination   by   carry-over  can
occur when high level  and low level samples
are analyzed sequentially.  To reduce  carry-
over, the purging device and sample syringe
are rinsed between samples with reagent
water.  When an unusually concentrated sam-
ple is encountered, it is followed by analysis
of a reagent water blank to check for carry-
over. For  samples containing large amounts
of water soluble materials, suspended  solids,
high boiling  compounds, or high  levels or
purgeable compounds, the  purge  device is
washed with  soap solution, rinsed with tap
and distilled water, and dried in an oven at
100-125 °C. The trap and other parts  of the
system are also  subject to  contamination;
therefore, frequent  bakeout and purging of
the entire system may be required.
  3.4  Interferences  resulting from samples
will vary considerably from source to source,
depending on the diversity of the industrial
complex or municipality being sampled.
                                         283

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                 4.  Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity  of
each compound or reagent used in this meth-
od has not been  precisely determined; how-
ever,  each  chemical  compound should  be
treated as a potential health hazard. Expo-
sure to these compounds should be reduced
to the lowest possible level.  The laboratory
is responsible for maintaining a  current
awareness file of OSHA regulations regard-
ing the safe handling of the chemicals speci-
fied in this method.  A reference file of data
handling sheets should also  be made avail-
able to all personnel involved in these anal-
yses.  Additional  information on laboratory
safety can be found in references 4-6.
  4.2  The following compounds covered  by
this method have been tentatively classified
as known or suspected human or mammalian
carcinogens:  benzene,  carbon tetrachloride,
chloroform,   and  vinyl  chloride.  Primary
standards of these toxic compounds should
be prepared in a hood, and a NIOSH/MESA
approved toxic gas respirator should be worn
when high concentrations are handled.

         5.   Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sample bottles for discrete sampling.
  5.1.1 Bottle—25 to  40  mL  with screw cap
(Pierce 13075, or equivalent). Detergent wash,
rinse with tap and distilled water, and dry at
>105 °C for one hr minimum before use.
  5.1.2 Septum—Teflon-faced       silicone
(Pierce 12722,  or equivalent), cleaned  as
above and baked at  100-200 °C, for  one hour
minimum.
  5.2  Purge  and trap  device—consists  of
purging device, trap, and desorber. Complete
devices are commercially available.
  5.2.1 Purging device—designed to accept 5
mL samples with water column at least 3 cm
deep. The volume of the gaseous head space
between the water and trap shall be less than
15 mL. The purge gas shall be introduced less
than  5 mm  from the base  of the water col-
umn  and shall pass  through  the  water as
bubbles with a diameter less than 3 mm. The
purging device shown in Figure 1 meets these
criteria.
  5.2.2 Trap—25  to 30 cm x 2.5 mm i.d.  min-
imum, containing the following:
  5.2.2.1  Methyl  silicone packing—one ±0.2
cm, 3 percent OV-1 on 60/80 mesh Chromosorb
W, or equivalent.
  5.2.2.2  Porous  polymer—15 ±1.0 cm, Tenax
GO  (2,6-diphenylene  oxide  polymer),  60/80
mesh, chromatographic grade, or equivalent.
  5.2.2.3  Silica   gel—8  ±1.0  cm,   Davison
Chemical, 35/60 mesh, grade 15, or equivalent.
The trap shown in Figure 2 meets these spec-
ifications.
  5.2.3 Desorber—shall heat the trap to  175
±5 °C in 45 seconds or less. The  polymer sec-
tion of the trap shall not exceed 180 °C, and
the remaining sections shall not exceed  220
°C.  The desorber shown in Figure 2 meets
these specifications.
  5.2.4 The purge and trap device may be a
separate unit or coupled to a GC as shown in
Figures 3 and 4.
  5.3  Gas chromatograph—shall be linearly
temperature programmable with initial and
final  holds, shall contain  a  glass  jet sepa-
rator as the MS interface,  and shall produce
results which meet the calibration (Section
7),  quality  assurance  (Section 8),  and per-
formance tests (Section 11) of this method.
  5.3.1 Column—2.8 ±0.4 m x 2 ±0.5  mm i. d.
glass, packekd  with one percent SP-1000 on
Carbopak B, 60/80 mesh, or equivalent.
  5.4  Mass spectrometer—70 eV electron im-
pact ionization; shall repetitively scan  from
20 to 250 amu every 2-3 seconds,  and produce
a unit resolution (valleys between m/z 174-176
less than 10 percent of the height of the m/z
175  peak), background corrected mass spec-
trum  from  50  ng  4-bromo-fluorobenzene
(BFB) injected  into the GC.  The BFB spec-
trum shall meet the mass-intensity criteria
in Table 3.  All  portions of the  GC column,
transfer lines, and  separator which connect
the GC column to  the ion source  shall re-
main at or above  the column temperature
during analysis to  preclude condensation of
less volatile compounds.
  5.5  Data  system—shall collect and record
MS data, store mass intensity data in spec-
tral libraries, process  GC/MS data  and gen-
erate reports, and shall calculate and record
response factors.
  5.5.1 Data acquisition—mass spectra  shall
be  collected continuously throughout  the
analysis and stored on a mass storage device.
  5.5.2 Mass spectral libraries—user created
libraries containing mass spectra  obtained
from analysis of authentic  standards shall be
employed  to reverse search GC/MS runs for
the compounds  of interest (Section 7.2).
  5.5.3 Data processing—the data system
shall be used to search, locate, identify, and
quantify the compounds of interest in  each
GC/MS analysis. Software routines shall be
employed  to compute  retention times  and
EICP  areas.  Displays of  spectra,  mass
chromatograms, and library comparisons are
required to verify results.
  5.5.4 Response  factors  and   multipoint
calibrations—the data system shall be used
to record and maintain lists  of response fac-
tors (response ratios for isotope dilution) and
generate multi-point calibration curves (Sec-
tion 7). Computations of  relative  standard
deviation (coefficient of variation) are useful
for testing  calibration linearity.  Statistics
on  initial  and on-going performance shall be
maintained (Sections 8 and 11).
  5.6  Syringes—5  mL  glass   hypodermic,
with Luer-lok tips.
  5.7  Micro syringes—10, 25, and 100 uL.
  5.8  Syringe valves—2-way, with Luer ends
(Telfon or Kel-F).
                                          284

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
  5.9  Syringe—5 mL,  gas-tight,  with shut-
off valve.
  5.10  Bottles—15  mL.,  screw-cap   with
Telfon liner.
  5.11  Balance—analytical,    capable    of
weighing 0.1 mg.

         6.  Reagents and Standards
  6.1  Reagent  water—water  in  which  the
compounds of interest and interfering com-
pounds are not detected by this method (Sec-
tion 11.7). It may be generated by any of the
following methods:
  6.1.1 Activated  carbon—pass  tap water
through a carbon bed (Calgon Filtrasorb-300,
or equivalent).
  6.1.2 Water   purifier—pass   tap  water
through  a purifier (Millipore Super Q,  or
equivalent).
  6.1.3 Boil and purge—heat tap water to 90-
100 °C and bubble contaminant free inert gas
through it for approx one hour.  While still
hot,  transfer the water to screw-cap bottles
and seal with a Teflon-lined cap.
  6.2  Sodium thiosulfate—ACS granular.
  6.3  Methanol—pesticide  quality or equiva-
lent.
  6.4  Standard  solutions—purchased as so-
lution or mixtures with certification to their
purity, concentration, and authenticity,  or
prepared from materials of known purity and
composition. If  compound purity is 96 per-
cent  or greater, the  weight may  be  used
without  correction  to  calculate  the  con-
centration of the standard.
  6.5  Preparation of  stock  solutions—pre-
pare  in methanol  using liquid  or gaseous
standards per the steps below. Observe the
safety precautions given in Section 4.
  6.5.1 Place approx 9.8 mL of methanol in a
10 mL ground  glass  stoppered  volumetric
flask. Allow the flask to stand unstoppered
for approximately  10  minutes or  until all
methanol wetted surfaces have dried. In each
case,  weigh the  flask, immediately add the
compound, then  immediately reweigh to pre-
vent  evaporation losses from  affecting  the
measurement.
  6.5.1.1  Liquids—using  a 100 |iL  syringe,
permit 2 drops of liquid to fall into the meth-
anol  without contacting  the leek  of  the
flask. Alternatively, inject a known volume
of the compound into the methanol in the
flask using a micro-syringe.
  6.5.1.2  Gases  (chloromethane,   bromome-
thane, chloroethane,  vinyl chloride)—fill  a
valved 5 mL gas-tight syringe with the com-
pound. Lower the needle to approximately 5
mm  above the methanol  meniscus.  Slowly
introduce the compound above the surface of
the meniscus. The gas will dissolve rapidly
in the methanol.
  6.5.2 Pill  the flask  to  volume,  stopper,
then  mix by inverting  several times.  Cal-
culate the concentration in mg/mL (ug/nL )
from the weight gain (or density if a known
volume was injected).
  6.5.3 Transfer the stock solution to a Tef-
lon  sealed  screw-cap-bottle.  Store,  with
minimal headspace, in the dark at -10 to
-20°C.
  6.5.4 Prepare  fresh  standards weekly for
the gases and 2-chloroethylvinyl ether.  All
other  standards  are   replaced  after   one
month, or sooner if comparison with check
standards indicate  a change  in  concentra-
tion.  Quality control  check standards that
can be used to  determine  the accuracy of
calibration standards are available  from the
US Environmental Protection Agency, Envi-
ronmental Monitoring and  Support Labora-
tory, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  6.6  Labeled compound spiking solution—
from  stock  standard solutions prepared as
above, or from mixtures, prepare the spiking
solution to contain a  concentration such
that a 5-10 jiL spike into each 5 mL sample,
blank, or aqueous standard  analyzed will re-
sult in a concentration of 20 jig/L of each la-
beled compound. For the gases and for  the
water  soluble compounds (acrolein, acrylo-
nitrile, acetone, diethyl ether, and MEK), a
concentration of 100 n.g/L may be  used. In-
clude the internal  standards (Section 7.5) in
this solution so that a concentration of 20 jig/
L in each sample, blank, or aqueous standard
will be produced.
  6.7  Secondary standards—using stock so-
lutions,  prepare  a  secondary standard in
methanol to contain each pollutant at a con-
centration of 500 (ig/mL  For the gases  and
water soluble compounds (Section 6.6), a con-
centration of 2.5 mg/mL may be used.
  6.7.1 Aqueous   calibration   standards—
using a 25 nL syringe,  add 20 nL of the sec-
ondary standard (Section 6.7) to 50, 100,  200,
500, and 1000 mL of reagent water to produce
concentrations of 200, 100, 50, 20, and 10 ng/L,
respectively. If the higher  concentration
standard  for the  gases and water soluble
compounds was  chosen  (Section 6.6), these
compounds will be at concentrations of 1000,
500, 250, 100, and 50  jig/L in the aqueous cali-
bration standards.
  6.7.2 Aqueous performance  standard—an
aqueous  standard containing all  pollutants,
internal  standards, labeled  compounds,  and
BFB is prepared daily, and analyzed each
shift  to  demonstrate  performance  (Section
11). This standard  shall contain either 20 or
100 (ig/L  of the labeled and pollutant gases
and water soluble  compounds,  10 ^g/L BFB,
and 20 ng/L of all other  pollutants, labeled
compounds,  and internal standards. It may
be the nominal  20 (ig/L aqueous calibration
standard (Section 6.7.1).
  6.7.3 A methanolic   standard  containing
all pollutants and  internal standards  is pre-
pared to demonstrate recovery of these com-
pounds when syringe injection and purge  and
trap analyses are  compared. This  standard
shall  contain either 100 |ig/mL or 500 ng/mL
of the gases and water soluble compounds,
and 100 ng/mL  of  the  remaining pollutants
                                         285

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
and internal standards (consistent with the
amounts in the aqueous performance stand-
ard in 6.7.2).
  6.7.4  Other standards which may be need-
ed are those for test of  BFB performance
(Section 7.1) and for collection of mass spec-
tra for storage in spectral libraries (Section
7.2).

              7.  Calibration

  7.1  Assemble the gas chromatographic ap-
paratus and  establish operating conditions
given in table 2. By injecting standards into
the GC, demonstrate that the analytical sys-
tem meets the detection limits in table 2 and
the mass-intensity  criteria in table  3 for  50
ngBPB.
  7.2  Mass spectral libraries—detection and
identification of  the  compound  of interest
are dependent  upon  the  spectra stored  in
user created libraries.
  7.2.1  Obtain a mass spectrum of each pol-
lutant and labeled compound and each inter-
nal standard by  analyzing  an  authentic
standard either singly or  as part of a mix-
ture  in which there  is no  interference be-
tween closely eluted components. That only
a single compound  is present is determined
by examination of the spectrum. Fragments
not attributable to  the  compound under
study indicate the presence of an interfering
compound. Adjust the analytical conditions
and scan rate (for this test only) to  produce
an undistorted spectrum at  the GG peak
maximum.  An  undistorted  spectrum  will
usually be obtained if five complete  spectra
are collected across the upper half of the G-C
peak.  Software algorithms designed  to "en-
hance" the spectrum  may eliminate distor-
tion, but may also eliminate authentic m/z's
or introduce other distortion.
  7.2.3  The authentic reference spectrum is
obtained under BPB tuning  conditions (Sec-
tion 7.1 and table 3) to normalize it to spec-
tra from other instruments.
  7.2.4  The spectrum is edited by saving the
5 most intense  mass  spectral peaks  and all
other mass spectral  peaks  greater  than  10
percent of the base peak. This  spectrum  is
stored for reverse search and for compound
confirmation.
  7.3  Assemble the purge and trap device.
Pack the trap as shown in Figure 2 and con-
dition    overnight    at   170-180   °C   by
backflushing with an inert gas at a flow rate
of 20-30 mL/min. Condition traps daily for a
minimum of 10 minutes prior to use.
  7.3.1  Analyze  the  aqueous  performance
standard  (Section  6.7.2)  according  to the
purge and trap procedure in Section 10. Com-
pute the area at the primary m/z (table 4) for
each  compound.  Compare  these areas  to
those obtained by  injecting one (iL of the
methanolic standard (Section 6.7.3) to deter-
mine compound recovery. The recovery shall
be greater than 20 percent for the water solu-
ble compounds,  and  60-110  percent  for all
other compounds.  This recovery  is  dem-
onstrated initially  for each purge and trap
GC/MS system. The test is repeated only if
the purge and trap or GC/MS systems  are
modified in any way that might result in a
change in recovery.
  7.3.2  Demonstrate that 100 ng toluene (or
toluene-d8) produces an area at m/z 91 (or 99)
approx one-tenth that required to exceed the
linear range of the  system. The exact value
must be  determined by experience  for each
instrument. It is used to match the calibra-
tion range of the instrument to the analyt-
ical range and detection limits required.
  7.4 Calibration by  isotope  dilution—the
isotope  dilution approach is used for  the
purgeable organic  compounds  when  appro-
priate labeled compounds are available  and
when interferences do not preclude the anal-
ysis. If labeled compounds are not available,
or interferences are present, internal stand-
ard methods (Section 7.5 or 7.6) are used. A
calibration curve   encompassing  the  con-
centration range of interest is prepared for
each compound determined. The relative re-
sponse  (RR) vs concentration  (ng/L) is plot-
ted or  computed using a linear regression.
An example of a calibration curve for  tol-
uene using toluene-d8 is given in figure 5.
Also shown are the ±10 percent error limits
(dotted  lines). Relative response  is  deter-
mined according to  the procedures described
below. A minimum of five data points are re-
quired for calibration (Section 7.4.4).
  7.4.1  The relative response (RR) of pollut-
ant to labeled compound is determined from
isotope ratio values calculated from acquired
data. Three isotope ratios are used in this
process:
  Rx=the isotope ratio measured in the pure
    pollutant (figure 6A).
  Ry=the isotope ratio of pure labeled com-
    pound (figure 6B).
  Rm=the isotope ratio measured in the ana-
    lytical mixture  of the pollutant and la-
    beled compounds (figure 6C).
  The  correct way  to calculate  RR is:
RR=(Ry-Rm)  (Rx+l)/(Rm-Rx)(Ry+l)  If R» is
not between 2Ry and O.SRx, the method does
not apply and the sample is analyzed by in-
ternal or external standard methods (Section
7.5 or 7.6).
  7.4.2  In most cases, the retention times of
the pollutant  and labeled compound are the
same and isotope ratios (R's) can  be  cal-
culated from the EICP areas, where: R=(area
at mi/z)/(area at nVz) If either of the areas is
zero, it is assigned a value of one in the  cal-
culations; that is, if: area of m.i/z=50721,  and
area of m2/z=0, then R=50721/l=50720. The my
z's are  always  selected such that Rx>Ry.
When there is  a difference in retention times
(RT) between the pollutant and labeled com-
pounds, special precautions are required to
determine the isotope ratios.
  Rx, Ry, and Rm are defined as follows:
                                         286

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                        Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
Rx=[area mi/z (at RTO]/1
Ry=l/[area m2/z (at RT2)]
Km=[area mi/z (at RT()]/[area
                                  (at RT2)]
  7.4.3  An example of the above calculations
can be taken from the data plotted in figure
6 for toluene and toluene-d8. For these data,
Rx=168920/l=168900, Ry=l/60960=0.00001640, and
Rm=96868/82508=1.174. The RR for the above
data is then calculated using the equation
given  in  Section  7.4.1.  For  the example,
RR=1.174.
  NOTE: Not all labeled compounds elute be-
fore their pollutant analogs.
  7.4.4  To calibrate  the analytical  system
by isotope dilution, analyze a 5 mL  aliquot
of each of the aqueous calibration standards
(Section  6.7.1)  spiked with an  appropriate
constant  amount  of  the labeled compound
spiking  solution  (Section 6.6),  using the
purge and trap procedure in section 10. Com-
pute the RR at each concentration.
  7.4.5  Linearity — if the ratio of relative re-
sponse to concentration for any compound is
constant  (less than 20 percent coefficient of
variation) over the 5 point calibration range,
an averaged relative  response/concentration
ratio may be used for that compound; other-
wise, the complete calibration curve for that
compound shall be used over the 5 point cali-
bration range.
  7.5  Calibration by internal standard — used
when criteria for isotope  dilution (Section
7.4) cannot be met. The method is applied to
pollutants having no labeled analog and to
the labeled compounds. The internal stand-
ards used for volatiles analyses are  bromo-
chloromethane,    2-bromo-l-chloropropane,
and 1,4-dichlorobutane.  Concentrations of
the labeled compounds and pollutants with-
out labeled analogs are computed relative to
the nearest  eluted  internal  standard,  as
shown in table 2.
  7.5.1   Response  factors — calibration   re-
quires the determination of response factors
(RF)  which are  defined by  the following
equation:
  RF=(AsxCls)/(A,sxCs), where As is the  EICP
area at the characteristic m/z for the com-
pound in the daily standard. A,., is the EICP
area at the characteristic  m/z  for the inter-
nal standard.
  C,s is the concentration (ug/L) of the inter-
nal standard
  Cs is the concentration of the pollutant in
the daily standard.
  7.5.2  The response factor is determined at
10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 ug/L for the pollutants
(optionally at  five times  these concentra-
tions  for  gases and  water  soluble  pollut-
ants — see  Section 6.7), in a way analogous to
that for calibration by isotope dilution (Sec-
tion 7.4.4). The  RF is plotted against con-
centration for each compound  in the stand-
ard (C.) to produce a calibration curve.
  7.5.3  Linearity — if  the  response   factor
(RF) for any compound is constant (less than
35 percent coefficient of variation) over the 5
point  calibration  range,  an  averaged  re-
sponse  factor may be used for that  com-
pound;  otherwise,  the complete calibration
curve for that compound shall be used over
the 5 point range.
  7.6  Combined calibration—by adding the
isotopically labeled compounds  and internal
standards (Section 6.6) to the aqueous cali-
bration standards (Section 6.7.1), a single set
of analyses can be used to produce calibra-
tion curves for the isotope dilution and in-
ternal standard methods.  These curves are
verified each shift (Section 11.5) by purging
the aqueous performance standard  (Section
6.7.2). Recalibration is required only if cali-
bration and on-going performance  (Section
11.5) criteria cannot be met.

    S.  Quality Assurance/Quality Control

  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality assur-
ance program. The minimum  requirements
of this program  consist of an  initial  dem-
onstration of laboratory capability,  analysis
of samples spiked with labeled compounds to
evaluate and document  data  quality,  and
analysis of standards and blanks as tests of
continued performance. Laboratory perform-
ance is compared to established  performance
criteria to determine if  the results of anal-
yses meet the performance characteristics of
the method.
  8.1.1  The analyst  shall make an initial
demonstration of the ability to  generate ac-
ceptable accuracy and precision with this
method.  This ability is established as de-
scribed in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2  The analyst is permitted to modify
this method to improve separations or lower
the costs of measurements, provided all per-
formance specifications are met. Each time a
modification-is made to the method, the ana-
lyst is required to repeat the procedure in
Section 8.2 to demonstrate method perform-
ance.
  8.1.3  Analyses  of blanks are required to
demonstrate freedom from contamination
and  that the  compounds  of  interest  and
interfering compounds have not  been carried
over from  a previous analysis  (Section  3).
The procedures and criteria for analysis of a
blank are described in Sections 8.5 and 11.7.
  8.1.4  The laboratory shall spike all  sam-
ples with  labeled compounds  to  monitor
method performance. This test  is described
in Section 8.3. When results of  these spikes
indicate  atypical  method performance for
samples, the samples are diluted  to  bring
method performance within acceptable lim-
its (Section 14.2).
  8.1.5  The laboratory shall, on an on-going
basis, demonstrate through the  analysis of
the aqueous performance standard (Section
6.7.2) that the analysis system is in  control.
This procedure is  described in  Sections 11.1
and 11.5.
                                          287

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
  8.1.6  The  laboratory  shall maintain  rec-
ords to define the quality of data that is gen-
erated. Development of accuracy statements
is described in Sections 8.4 and 11.5.2.
  8.2  Initial precision and accuracy—to es-
tablish  the  ability to  generate  acceptable
precision  and accuracy, the  analyst  shall
perform the following operations'.
  8.2.1  Analyze   two  sets  of  four 5-mL
aliquots (8 aliquots total) of the aqueous per-
formance  standard (Section 6.7.2) according
to the method beginning in Section 10.
  8.2.2  Using results  of the first set of four
analyses in Section 8.2.1, compute the aver-
age recovery (X) in jig/L and the standard de-
viation  of the recovery (s) in jig/L  for each
compound, by isotope  dilution for pollui-
tants with a labeled analog, and by internal
standard for labeled compounds and pollut-
ants with  no labeled analog.
  8.2.3  For each compound, compare s and X
with the corresponding limits for initial pre-
cision and accuracy found in table 5. If s and
X for all compounds meet the acceptance cri-
teria, system performance  is acceptable and
analysis of blanks and samples may begin. If
individual X falls outside the range for accu-
racy, system  performance  is unacceptable
for that compound.
  NOTE: The large number of  compounds in
table 5 present a substantial probability that
one or more will fail one of the acceptance
criteria when all compoulds are analyzed. To
determine if the analytical system  is out of
control, or if the failure can be attributed to
probability, proceed as follows:
  8.2.4  Using the results of the se_cond set of
four analyses, compute s and X  for  only
those compounds which failed the test of the
first set of  four  analyses  (Section 8.2.3). If
these compounds now pass, system  perform-
ance is acceptable for all compounds and
analysis of blanks and samples may begin. If,
however,  any of the same compounds fail
again, the analysis system is not performing
properly for the compound(s) in question. In
this event, correct the problem and repeat
the entire test (Section 8.2.1).
  8.3  The laboratory shall spike all samples
with labeled compounds  to assess  method
performance on the sample matrix.
  8.3.1   Spike  and analyze each sample ac-
cording to the method beginning in Section
10.
  8.3.2  Compute the percent recovery (P) of
the  labeled compounds  using the  internal
standard method (Section 7.5).
  8.3.3  Compare  the percent  recovery for
each compound with the corresponding la-
beled compound recovery limit in table 5. If
the recovery of any compound falls outside
its warning limit, method performance is un-
acceptable for that compound in that sam-
ple. Therefore, the sample matrix is complex
and  the sample is to be diluted and reana-
lyzed, per Section 14.2.
  8.4  As part of the QA program for the lab-
oratory,  method  accuracy  for  wastewater
samples shall be  assessed and records shall
be maintained. After  the analysis  of five
wastewater  samples for which  the  labeled
compounds pass the tests in Section 8.3.3,
compute the average  percent recovery  (P)
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (Sp) for the labeled compounds only.
Express the accuracy  assessment  as  a per-
cent recovery interval from P-2Sp to P+2sp.
For example, if P=90% and sp=10%, the accu-
racy interval is expressed as 70-110%. Update
the accuracy assessment for each compound
on a regular basis (e.g. after each ,5-10 new
accuracy measurements).
  8.5  Blanks—reagent water blanks are ana-
lyzed to demonstrate  freedom from  carry-
over (Section 3) and contamination.
  8.5.1 The  level at  which the purge and
trap system will carry greater than 5 jig/L of
a pollutant  of interest (table  1) into a suc-
ceeding blank shall be determined by ana-
lyzing successively  larger concentrations of
these compounds. When a sample contains
this concentration or  more, a blank shall be
analyzed immediately  following this sample
to demonstrate no  carry-over at the 5 ng/L
level.
  8.5.2 With each sample lot  (samples ana-
lyzed on the same 8  hr shift), a blank shall be
analyzed immediately after analysis  of  the
aqueous performance standard (Section 11.1)
to demonstrate  freedom from  contamina-
tion.  If any of the compounds of interest
(table 1) or any potentially interfering com-
pound is found in a blank at greater than 10
Hg/L (assuming a response factor of 1 relative
to the nearest eluted  internal standard for
compounds not listed in table 1), analysis of
samples  is halted until the source  of con-
tamination is eliminated and a blank shows
no evidence of contamination at this level.
  8.6  The  specifications contained  in this
method can be met if the apparatus used is
calibrated  properly, then  maintained in  a
calibrated state.
  The standards used for calibration (Section
7), calibration verification (Section 11.5) and
for initial (Section 8.2) and on-going (Section
11.5) precision and accuracy should be iden-
tical, so that the  most precise results will be
obtained. The  GC/MS instrument in par-
ticular will provide  the most reproducible re-
sults if dedicated to the settings and condi-
tions required for the analyses of volatiles
by this method.
  8.7  Depending  on   specific program  re-
quirements, field  replicates may be collected
to determine the precision of the sampling
technique, and spiked samples  may be re-
quired  to  determine  the  accuracy of  the
analysis when internal or external standard
methods are used.
                                         288

-------
 Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
    9.  Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling

  9.1  Grab samples  are  collected  in glass
containers having  a total volume greater
than  20 mL. Fill sample  bottles so that no
air bubbles pass through the sample as the
bottle is filled.  Seal  each bottle so that no
air bubbles are entrapped. Maintain the  her-
metic seal on the sample bottle until time of
analysis.
  9.2  Samples are maintained at 0-4 °C from
the time of collection until analysis.  If the
sample contains residual  chlorine, add  so-
dium thiosulfate preservative (10 mg/40 mL)
to the empty sample bottles just  prior to
shipment to the sample site. EPA  Methods
330.4 and 330.5 may be used for measurement
of residual chlorine (Reference 8). If preserv-
ative has  been  added,  shake bottle  vigor-
ously for one minute immediately after  fill-
ing.
  9.3  Experimental evidence indicates that
some aromatic compounds, notably  benzene,
toluene, and ethyl benzene are susceptible to
rapid biological  degradation under certain
environmental   conditions.   Refrigeration
alone may not be adequate to preserve these
compounds in wastewaters  for  more than
seven days. For  this reason, a separate sam-
ple should be collected, acidified,  and ana-
lyzed when these aromatics are to  be  deter-
mined. Collect about 500 mL  of sample in a
clean container.
  Adjust the pH of  the sample to about 2 by
adding HC1 (1+1) while stirring. Check  pH
with narrow range  (1.4 to 2.8) pH paper.  Fill
a sample  container as described in Section
9.1. If residual chlorine is  present, add  so-
dium thiosulfate to a separate sample con-
tainer and fill as in Section 9.1.
  9.4  All samples shall be analyzed within 14
days of collection.

    10.  Purge, Trap, and GC/MS Analysis

  10.1  Remove standards and samples from
cold storage and bring to 20-25 °.
  10.2  Adjust the purge gas flow rate to 40 ±4
mL/min. Attach  the trap inlet to the purging
device and set the  valve to the purge mode
(figure 3). Open the syringe valve located on
the purging device sample introduction nee-
dle (figure 1).
  10.3  Remove the  plunger from a 5-mL sy-
ringe and attach a closed syringe valve. Open
the sample bottle  and carefully pour  the
sample into the  syringe barrel until it over-
flows. Replace the plunger and compress the
sample. Open the syringe valve and vent  any
residual air while adjusting the sample vol-
ume to 5.0 mL. Because this process of tak-
ing an aliquot destroys the  validity of  the
sample for future analysis, fill a second sy-
ringe at this time to protect against possible
loss of data.  Add an  appropriate amount of
the labeled compound spiking solution (Sec-
tion 6.6) through the valve bore, then close
the valve.
  10.4  Attach the syringe valve assembly to
the  syringe  valve on  the purging  device.
Open both syringe valves and inject the sam-
ple into the purging chamber.
  10.5  Close  both valves and purge the sam-
ple for 11.0 ±0.1 minutes at 20-25 °C.
  10.6  After  the 11 minute purge time, at-
tach the trap to the chromatograph and set
the purge and trap apparatus to the desorb
mode (figure 4). Desorb  the trapped com-
pounds  into  the  GC column by heating the
trap to 170-180  °C while  backflushing with
carrier gas at 20-60 mL/min for four minutes.
Start MS data acquisition upon start of the
desorb cycle, and start the GC column tem-
perature program 3 minutes  later.  Table 1
summarizes the recommended operating con-
ditions for the gas chromatograph. Included
in this table are retention times and detec-
tion limits that  were  achieved under these
conditions. Other columns may be used pro-
vided the requirements in Section 8 can be
met. If the priority pollutant gases produce
GC peaks so broad that the precision and re-
covery specifications (Section 8.2) cannot be
met, the column may  be  cooled to ambient
or  sub-ambient  temperatures  to  sharpen
these peaks.
  10.7  While analysis  of the  desorbed com-
pounds proceeds,  empty the purging chamber
using the sample introduction syringe. Wash
the chamber  with two  5-mL portions of rea-
gent water.  After the purging device  has
been emptied, allow the purge gas to vent
through the chamber until the frit is dry, so
that it is ready for the next sample.
  10.8  After  desorbing  the sample for four
minutes, recondition the  trap by returning
to the purge mode. Wait 15 seconds, then
close the syringe valve on the purging device
to begin gas flow through  the trap. Maintain
the trap temperature at 170-180 °C. After ap-
proximately seven minutes, turn off the trap
heater and open the syringe valve to stop the
gas flow through the  trap. When cool,  the
trap is ready  for the next sample.

          11. System Performance
  11.1 At the beginning of each 8 hr shift
during which analyses are performed, system
calibration and performance shall be verified
for all  pollutants and labeled compounds.
For these tests, analysis of the aqueous per-
formance  standard (Section 6.7.2)  shall  be
used to verify all performance criteria. Ad-
justment and/or recalibration (per Section 7)
shall be performed until all performance cri-
teria are met. Only after all performance cri-
teria are  met may blanks and samples  be
analyzed.
  11.2 BFB spectrum validity—the  criteria
in table 3 shall be met.
  11.3 Retention times—the absolute reten-
tion times of all compounds  shall approxi-
mate those given in Table 2.
                                         289

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1624
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  11.4  GC resolution—the valley height be-
tween toluene and toluene-d8 (at m/z 91 and
99 plotted on the same graph) shall be less
than 10  percent of the taller of the  two
peaks.
  11.5  Calibration verification and on-going
precision  and accuracy—compute  the  con-
centration of each polutant (Table 1) by iso-
tope  dilution   (Section  7.4)  for   those
compmunds  which  have  labeled  analogs.
Compute the concentration of each pollutant
(Table 1) which has no labeled analog by the
internal standard method (Section 7.5). Com-
pute the concentration of the labeled  com-
pounds  by  the  internal  standard method.
These concentrations are computed based on
the calibration data determined in Section 7.
  11.5.1  For each pollutant and labeled com-
pound, compare the concentration with the
corresponding limit for on-going accuracy in
Table 5. If all compmunds meet the accept-
ance criteria, system performance is accept-
able and analysis of blanks and samples may
continue.  If any individual value falls out-
side the range given, system performance is
unacceptable for that compound.
  NOTE: The large number of compounds in
Table  5  present a  substantial probability
that one or more will fail the acceptance cri-
teria when  all  compounds are analyzed. To
determine if the analytical system is out of
control, or if the failure may be attributed
to probability, proceed as follows:
  11.5.1.1  Analyze a  second aliquot  of the
aqueous   performance   standard  (Section
6.7.2).
  11.5.1.2  Compute  the concentration for
only those compounds which failed the first
test (Section 11.5.1). If these compounds now
pass, system performance  is  acceptable for
all compounds  and analyses  of blanks and
samples may proceed. If, however, any of the
compounds fail again, the measurement sys-
tem is  not  performing properly  for  these
compounds. In this event, locate and correct
the problem or recalibrate the system  (Sec-
tion 7), and repeat the entire test (Section
11.1) for all compounds.
  11.5.2  Add results  which pass the  speci-
fication in 11.5.1.2 to initial (Section 8.2) and
previous on-going data. Update QC charts to
form a graphic representation of laboratory
performance (Figure 7). Develop a statement
of accuracy for each pollutant and labeled
compound by calculating  the average  per-
centage recovery (R)  and the standard  devi-
ation of percent recovery (&,). Express the ac-
curacy as a recovery interval from R-2s, to
R+2Sr. For example, if R=95%  and  Sr=5%, the
accuracy is  85-105 percent.
12.  Qualitative  Determination—Accomplished
  by Comparison of Data from Analysis of a
  Sample or Blank with Data from Analysis of
  the Shift Standard  (Section 11.1). Identifica-
  tion is Confirmed When Spectra and Reten-
  tion Times Agree Per the Criteria Below

  12.1  Labeled  compounds and pollutants
having no labeled analog:
  12.1.1  The  signals for  all  characteristic
masses  stored in the spectral  library (Sec-
tion 7.2.4) shall be present and shall  maxi-
mize within the same two consecutive scans.
  12.1.2  Either (1) the background corrected
EICP areas, or (2) the corrected relative in-
tensities of the mass spectral  peaks at the
GC peak maximum shall agree within a fac-
tor of two (0.5  to  2 times) for all masses
stored in the library.
  12.1.3  The retention time relative to the
nearest eluted  internal standard  shall  be
within ±7 scans  or ±20 seconds, whichever is
greater.
  12.2  Pollutants having a labeled analog:
  12.2.1  The  signals for  all  characteristic
masses  stored in the spectral  library (Sec-
tion 7.2.4) shall be present and shall  maxi-
mize within the same two consecutive scans.
  12.2.2  Either (1) the background corrected
EICP areas, or (2) the corrected relative in-
tensities of the mass spectral  peaks at the
GC peak maximum shall agree within a fac-
tor of two for all masses stored in the spec-
tral library.
  12.2.3  The  retention  time difference be-
tween  the pollutant and  its labeled analog
shall  agree within  ±2 scans or ±6  seconds
(whichever is  greater) of this  difference in
the shift standard (Section 11.1).
  12.3  Masses present in  the  experimental
mass spectrum  that are not present in the
reference mass spectrum shall  be accounted
for by contaminant or background ions. If
the experimental mass spectrum is contami-
nated, an experienced spectrometrist (Sec-
tion 1.4) is to  determine the presence or ab-
sence of the compound.

       13.  Quantitative Determination

  13.1  Isotope dilution—by adding a known
amount of a labeled  compound to every sam-
ple prior to purging, correction for recovery
of the pollutant can be made because the pol-
lutant  and  its  labeled analog exhibit the
same effects  upon purging, desorption, and
gas chromatography. Relative response (RR)
values for sample mixtures are used in con-
junction with calibration curves described in
Section 7.4 to determine  concentrations  di-
rectly, so long as labeled compound spiking
levels are constant. For the toluene  example
given in Figure 6 (Section 7.4.3), RR would be
equal to 1.174.  For this RR value, the toluene
calibration curve given  in Figure 5 indicates
a concentration of 31.8 p.g/L.
                                          290

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
  13.2  Internal standard—calculate the con-
centration using the response factor  deter-
mined from calibration  data (Section  7.5)
and the following equation:
  Concentration =(AS x C1S)/(A,S x RP)  where
the terms are as defined in Section 7.5.1.
  13.3  If the EICP area at the quantitation
mass for any compound exceeds the calibra-
tion range of the system, the sample is  di-
luted by successive factors of 10 and these di-
lutions are analyzed until the area is within
the calibration range.
  13.4  Report results for all pollutants  and
labeled compounds  (Table  1)  found  in  all
standards,  blanks,  and samples, in  ug/L to
three significant figures. Results for samples
which have been  diluted are reported  at the
least dilute level  at which the area at  the
quantitation mass is within  the calibration
range  (Section 13.3) and the  labeled com-
pound recovery is within the normal  range
for the Method (Section 14.2).

       14.   Analysis of Complex Samples

  14.1  Untreated  effluents and other sam-
ples frequently contain high levels (>1000  ug/
L) of the compounds of interest and of inter-
fering compounds.  Some  samples will foam
excessively  when  purged; others will over-
load the trap/or GC column.
  14.2  Dilute 0.5 mL of sample with 4.5  mL
of reagent  water and analyze  this diluted
sample when labeled compound recovery is
outside the  range given in Table 5. If the  re-
covery remains outside of the range for this
diluted sample,  the aqueous performance
standard shall be  analyzed (Section 11) and
calibration verified (Section  11.5). If the  re-
covery for  the  labeled compmund in  the
aqueous performance standard is outside the
range given in Table 5, the analytical system
is out  of control. In this case, the instrumelt
shall be repaired, the performance specifica-
tions in Section 11 shall be met, and  the
analysis of the undiluted sample shall  be  re-
peated. If the recovery for the aqueous per-
formance standard is within the range given
in Table 5, the method does not work on the
sample being  analyzed and the result may
not  be reported  for regulatory compliance
purposes.
  14.3  Reverse search  computer programs
can  misinterpret the spectrum of chroma-
tographically  unresolved pollutant  and  la-
beled compound pairs with overlapping spec-
tra when  a high  level of the pollutant is
present.  Examine  each chromatogram   for
peaks greater than the height of the internal
standard peaks. These peaks can obscure the
compounds of interest.

          15.  Method Performance

  15.1  The  specifications  for  this method
were taken from the inter-laboratory valida-
tion of EPA Method 624 (reference 9). Method
1624 has been shown to yield slightly better
performance on treated effluents than Meth-
od 624. Additional method performance data
can be found in Reference 10.

                References

  1. "Performance Tests for the Evaluation of
Computerized  Gas   Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry Equipment and Laboratories,"
USEPA,  EMSL/Cincinnati, OH 45268,  EPA-
600/4-80-025 (April 1980).
  2.  Bellar,  T.A.  and  Lichtenberg,   J.J.,
"Journal American  Water Works  Associa-
tion," 66, 739 (1974).
  3.  Bellar,  T.A.  and  Lichtenberg,   J.J.,
"Semi-automated  Headspace  Analysis  of
Drinking Waters and Industrial  Waters for
Purgeable Volatile  Organic Compounds," in
Measurement of Organic Pollutants Water and
Wastewater,  C.E. VanHall, ed., American So-
ciety  for Testing Materials, Philadelphia,
PA, Special Technical Publication 686, (1978).
  4.  "Working  with  Carcinogens," DHEW,
PHS, NIOSH, Publication 77-206 (1977).
  5. "OSHA Safety  and Health  Standards,
General Industry," 29 CFR part 1910, OSHA
2206, (1976).
  6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories," American Chemical Society Publica-
tion, Committee on Chemical Safety (1979).
  7. "Handbook of Analytical Quality Control
in  Water  and  Wastewater  Laboratories,"
USEPA, EMSL/Cincinnati,  OH 45268, EPA-4-
79-019 (March 1979).
  8. "Methods 330.4 and 330.5 for Total Resid-
ual Chlorine," USEPA, EMSL/Cincinnati, OH
45268, EPA-4-79-020 (March 1979).
  9. "EPA Method Study 29 EPA Method 624—
Purgeables," EPA 600/4-84-054, National Tech-
nical   Information   Service,  PB84-209915,
Springfield, Virginia 22161, June 1984.
  10. "Colby, B.N., Beimer, R.G., Rushneck,
D.R.,  and Telliard, W.A., "Isotope  Dilution
Gas Chromatography-Mass  Spectrometry for
the Determination of Priority Pollutants in
Industrial   Effluents,"   USEPA,   Effluent
Guidelines  Division,  Washington, DC  20460
(1980).
       TABLE 1—VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ANALYZED BY ISOTOPE DILUTION Gc/MS
Compound
Acetone 	 	
Acrolem . 	
Acrylomtnle 	 	
Bromodichloromethane 	
Store!
81552
34210
34215
34030
32101
CAS reg-
istry
67-64-1
107-02-8
107-13-1
71-43-2
75-27-4
EPA-
EGD
516V
002V
003V
004 V
048V
NPDES
001 V
002V
003V
012V
                                         291

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  TABLE 1—VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ANALYZED BY ISOTOPE DILUTION Gc/MS—Continued
Compound
Bromoform . . . .... . 	 . .
Bromomethane . 	 	
Carbon tetrachlonde . . 	
Chlorobenzene . ... 	
Chloroethane ... ... .... ....
Chloroform 	 .... 	
Chloromethane . . ... 	
Dibromochloromethane 	 . . . . .

1,1-dichloroethene 	 	
Trans-1 ,2-dichtoroethane 	 .....

Cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene ... ... 	
Trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene . ... 	
Diethyl ether . . 	
Ethylbenzene 	 . 	

1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 	 	
Tetrachlorethene .... 	
Toluene 	 	
1,1,1-trichloroethane 	
1,1,2-trichtoroethane ... .. .... 	
Tnchloroethene . . . . 	

Storet
32104
34413
32102
34301
34311
34576
32106
34418
32105
34496
34536
34501
34546
34541
34704
34699
81576
81582
34371
34423
81595
34516
34475
34010
34506
34511
39180
39175

CAS reg-
istry
75-25-2
74-83-9
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
110-75-^)
67-66-1
74-87-3
124-48-1
75-34-3
107-06-2
75-35^1
156-60-5
78-87-5
10061-01-5
10061-02-6
60-29-7
123-91-1
100-41-4
75-09-2
78-93-3
79-34-5
127-18-4
108-88-3
71-55-6
79-00-5
79-01-6
75-01-4

EPA-
EGD
047V
046V
006V
007V
016V
019V
023V
045V
051 V
013V
010V
029V
030V
032 V
033V
515V
527V
038V
044V
514V
015V
085V
086V
011 V
014V
087V
088 V

NPDES
005V
020V
006V
007V
009V
010 V
011 V
021 V
008V
014 V
015 V
016V
026V
017V

019V
022V

023V
024V
025V
027V
028V
029V
031 V

TABLE   2—GAS   CHROMATOGRAPHY    OF
  PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  BY  ISO-
  TOPE DILUTION GC/MS
TABLE   2—GAS   CHROMATOGRAPHY    OF
  PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  BY  ISO-
  TOPE DILUTION GC/MS—Continued
EGD
No
(1)
181
245
345
246
346
288
388
216
316
244
344
616
716
002
203
303
229
329
213
313
615
715
230
330
614
714
223
323
210
310
Compound
Bromochloromethane (IS)
Chloromethane-d3 	
Chloromethane 	
Bromomethane-dS . .
Bromomethane 	
Vinyl chloride-d3
Vinyl chloride 	
Chloroethane-d5 ....
Chloroethane 	
Methylene chtonde-d2 ....
Methylene chloride 	
Acetone-d6
Acetone 	
Acrolein
Acry\onitnle-d3 	
Acrylonitrile 	
1 , 1 -dichloroethene-d2
1,1-dichloroethene 	
1,1-dichloroethane-d3 .
1,1-dichloroethane 	
Diethyl ether-d10 	
Diethyl ether
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene-d2 ..
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Methyl ethyl ketone-d3 	
Methyl ethyl ketone 	
Chloroform-13Cl 	
Chloroform 	
1,2-dichloroethane-d4
1.2-dichloroethane 	
Ref
EGD
No
181
181
245
181
246
181
288
181
216
181
244
181
616
181
181
203
181
229
181
213
181
615
181
230
181
614
181
223
181
210
Mean
re-
ten-
tion
time
(sec)
730
147
148
243
246
301
304
378
386
512
517
554
565
566
606
612
696
696
778
786
804
820
821
821
840
848
861
861
901
910
Min-
l
mum
level
(2)

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
           Pt.  136, App. A,  Meth. 1624
TABLE    2—GAS    CHROMATOGRAPHY    OF
  PURGEABLE ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS  BY  ISO-
  TOPE DILUTION GC/MS—Continued
TABLE 4—VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND
        CHARACTERISTIC MASSES

EGD
No.
d)

207
307
238
338
185


Compound


Chlorobenzene-d5 	

Ethylbenzene-d10 . . 	

Bromofluorobenzene 	

Ref
EGD
No

183
207
183
238
183
Mean
re-

time
(sec)
1679
1679
1802
1820
1985
Mm-
mum
level
»)
(tf
10
10
10
10
10
  (1) Reference numbers beginning with 0, 1 or 5 indicate a
pollutant quantified by the internal standard method, reference
numbers beginning with 2 or 6 indicate a labeled compound
quantified by the internal standard method; reference numbers
beginning with 3 or 7 indicate a pollutant quantified by isotope
dilution.
  (2) This  is a minimum level at which the analytical system
shall give recognizable mass spectra (background corrected)
and acceptable calibration points. Column. 2.4m (8 ft) x 2 mm
i.d. glass, packed with one percent SP-1000 coated on 60/80
Carbopak B Carrier gas. helium at 40 mUmm. Temperature
program: 3 min at 45 °C, 8 °C per min to 240 °C, hold at 240
°C for 15 minutes.
  NOTE. The specifications in this table were developed from
data collected from three wastewater laboratories


TABLE 3—BFB MASS-INTENSITY SPECIFICATIONS
Labeled compound



Benzene 	 	 	
Bromoform 	
Bromomethale 	 . ...
Carbon tetrachlonde 	 	
Chlorobenzene 	

2-chloroethylvinyl ether 	

Chloromethane 	
Dibromochloromethane 	
1,1-dichloroethane 	
1,2-dichloroethane 	
1,1-dichloroethene 	
Trans-1 ,2-d(chloroethene 	
1 2-dichloropropane
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene 	
Trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene 	
Diethyl ether 	
Ethylbenzene — 	
Methylene chloride 	
Methyl ethyl ketone
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 	
Tetrachloroethene 	 	 	
Toluene 	 	
1 1,1-tnchloroethane
1 1 2-tnchloroethane
Tnchloroethene 	
Vinyl chloride 	

Analog
d6
d2
d3
d6
13C
13C
d3
13C
05
d5
d7
13C
d3
13C
d3
d4
d2
d2
d6
d4
d4
d10
d8
d10
d2
d3
d2
13C2
d8
d3
13C2
13C
d3

Primary ml
z's
58/64
56/58
53/56
78/84
83/86
173/176
96/99
47/48
112/117
64/71
106/113
85/86
50/53
129/130
63/66
62/67
61/65
61/65
63/67
75/79
75/79
74/84
88/96
106/116
84/88
72/75
83/84
166/172
92/99
97/102
83/84
95/133
62/65

Mass Intensity required
50 15 to 40 percent of mass 95.
75 30 to 60 percent of mass 95
95 base peak, 100 percent.
96 5 to 9 percent of mass 95.
1 73 <2 percent of mass 1 74.
174 >50 percent of mass 95
175 5 to 9 percent of mass 174
176 95 to 101 percent of mass 174
177 5 to 9 percent of mass 176.
TABLE 5 — ACCEPTANCE
Methyl ethyl ketone 	
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 	
Tetrachloroethene 	 	 	
Toluene 	 	
1 1,1-trichloroethane
1 1 2-tnchloroethane
Tnchloroethene 	
Vinyl chloride 	


CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
(K
d3
d2
13C2
d8
d3
13C2
13C
d3
B4/8H
72/75
83/84
166/172
92/99
97/102
83/84
95/133
62/65

Acceptance cntena at 20 ng/L
Compound
Labeled
Initial precision and accuracy C°mo^""d
section 823 £%SZ«
142
s (ug/L) X (ug/L) P (percent)
Acetone 	
Acrolem 	
Acrylonitriie

Bromodichloromethane 	 ... .


Chlorobenzene 	
Chloroethane 	 ...
2-chloroethylvinyl ether 	
Chloroform 	 . 	

1 1 -dichloroethane 	
1 2-dlchloroethane 	
1,1-dichloroethene 	 	
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene 	
	 Note 1
	 Note 2
	 Note 2
... . 9.0 13.0-28.2
	 82 65-31 5
70 7 4-35 1
. . 25.0 d-543
	 6.9 159-248
82 14.2-29.6
14.8 2.1-46.7
	 36.0 d-698
79 11 6-26.3
26 0 d-55 5
79 11 2-29 1
6.7 11 4-31 4
	 7.7 11 6-30 1
117 d-498
	 7.4 10.5-31.5
ns-196
ns-199
ns-214
ns-414
42-165
ns-205
ns-308
ns-554
18-172
ns-410
16-185
23-191
12-192
ns-315
15-195
On-going
accuracy
sec. 11 5
R(ugA)
4-33
4-34
6-36
d-61
12-30
4-35
d-51
d-79
8-30
d-64
8-32
9-33
8-33
d-52
8-34
                                               293

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1624
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
              TABLE 5—ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued

                                                                 Acceptance criteria at 20 ug/L
                      Compound
                          Labeled

Initial precision and accuracy   c°'TJ?°""d
      eprtinn o p Q          IBlAJVtJiy
      section 8^3         sec 8 3 and
                            14.2
On-going
accuracy
sec. 11.5
                                                        s (ng/L)
                         P (percent)    R (ng/L)
1,2-dichloropropane 	
Cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene 	
Trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene 	
Diethyl ether 	
P-dioxane .... 	
Ethyl benzene 	 	
Methylene chloride 	
Methyl ethyl ketone 	
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 	
Tetrachloroethene 	
Toluene 	
1,1,1-tnchloroethane 	 	
1,1,2-tnchloroethane 	
Trichloroethene 	
Vinyl chloride 	
	 192
	 221
	 14.5


	 9.6
	 97

	 96
	 66
	 6.3
	 59
	 7.1
	 89
	 279
d-468
d-51.0
d-402
Motel
Motel
156-28.5
dM98
Motel
107-300
15 1-28.5
14 5-28 7
105-33.4
118-297
16.6-29.5
d-58.5
ns-343
ns-381
ns-284


ns-203
ns-316

5-199
31-181
4-193
12-200
21-184
35-196
ns-452
d-S1
d-56
cM4


5-35
d-50

7-34
11-32
6-33
8-35
9-32
12-34
d-65
  d = detected; result must be greater than zero.
  ns = no specification; limit would be below detection limit
  NOTE 1: Specifications not available for these compounds at time of release of this method.
  NOTE 2- Specifications not developed for these compounds, use method 603.
                                                294

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
      Pt. 136, App. A.Meth. 1624
                                                    CAHflPER GAS
                                                    ,_,
                                                    PRESSURE     r ipr
                                                                     LIQUID INJECTION PORTS
                                                                            ^- CONFIRMATORY COLUMN


                                                                             DCTECTOH
  MEDIUM POAOSI'
  FIGURE 1   Purging Device.
FIGURE 3  Schematic of Purge and Trap
Device—Purge Mode.
   1"
 FIGURE 2  Trap Packings and Construction to
 Include Oesorb Capability.
FIGURE 4  Schematic of Purge and Trap
Device—Desorb Mode.
                                         295

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth.  1625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 > 10-
         1       10   20   SO   100 200
              CONCENTRATION (uo/U

3

s
a- 80.000 -

TOLUENE-O,
* • ,
• • • •







                                                                  ANALYSIS NUMBER


100
090.
TOLUENE
• • ~*~ •
' * • * *

        6/1  6"  6/16/16/26/2  6/3  6/3 6/4 6/5
                   DATE ANALYZED
 FIGURE 5  Relative Response Calibration Curve
 for Toluene  The Dotted Lines Enclose a ±10
 Percent Error Window.
FIGURE 7  Quality Control Charts Showing Area
(top graph) and Relative Response of Toluene to
Toluene-d, (lower graph) Plotted as a Function of
Time or Analysis Number
                                - M/299

                                - M/Z 92
           A=60960—vA
                            M/Z 92 . 96668
                            M/Z 99 82508
                                - M/Z 99

                                -M/Z 92
  FIGURE 6  Extracted Ion  Current  Profiles  for
  (A)  Toluene, (B) Toluene-d,, and a Mixture of
  Toluene and Toluene-d,.
 METHOD  1625 REVISION B—SEMI/VOLATILE OR-
   GANIC COMPOUNDS BY ISOTOPE DILUTION GC/
   MS

           1.  Scope and Application
additional compounds amenable  to extrac-
tion and analysis by  capillary column gas
chromatography-mass   spectrometry   (GC/
MS).
  1.2  The chemical compounds listed in Ta-
   1.1  This method is designed to determine   bles 1 and 2 may be determined in municipal
 the semivolatile toxic organic pollutants as-   and industrial  discharges by  this method.
 soclated with  the 1976  Consent  Decree and   The method is  designed to meet the  survey
                                             296

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
requirements of Effluent Guidelines Division
(EGD)  and the  National  Pollutants  Dis-
charge  Elimination  System (NPDES) under
40 CFR  136.1. Any modifications of this meth-
od, beyond  those expressly permitted, shall
be considered as major modifications subject
to application and approval of alternate test
procedures under 40 CFR 136.4 and 136.5.
  1.3  The detection limit  of this method is
usually dependent  on  the level of inter-
ferences rather than  instrumental limita-
tions. The limits listed in Tables 3 and 4 rep-
resent the minimum quantity that can be de-
tected with no interferences present.
  1.4  The  GC/MS portions of this  method
are for use only by analysts experienced with
GC/MS  or under the close supervision of such
qualified  persons.  Laboratories unfamiliar
with analyses of environmental samples by
GC/MS  should run the performance tests in
reference 1 before beginning.

           2.  Summary of Method

  2.1  Stable isotopically labeled analogs of
the compounds of interest are added to a one
liter wastewater sample. The sample is  ex-
tracted at pH 12-13, then at pH <2 with meth-
ylene chloride  using continuous extraction
techniques.  The extract is dried over sodium
sulfate  and  concentrated to a volume of one
mL. An internal standard is added to the ex-
tract, and the extract is injected into the  gas
chromatograph  (GC).  The compounds  are
separated by  GC and detected by  a  mass
spectrometer (MS).  The labeled compounds
serve to correct the variability of the analyt-
ical technique.
  2.2  Identification  of a compound (quali-
tative  analysis) is performed  by comparing
the GC retention time and background cor-
rected  characteristic spectral  masses with
those of authentic standards.
  2.3  Quantitative analysis is performed by
GC/MS  using extracted  ion current profile
(EICP)  areas. Isotope dilution is used  when
labeled  compounds are available; otherwise,
an internal standard method is used.
  2.4  Quality is  assured through reproduc-
ible calibration and testing of the extraction
and GC/MS systems.

     3.  Contamination and Interferences

  3.1  Solvents,   reagents,   glassware,  and
other sample processing  hardware may yield
artifacts and/or elevated baselines causing
misinterpretation of  chromatograms  and
spectra. All materials shall be demonstrated
to be free from interferences under the con-
ditions  of analysis by running method blanks
initially and with each sample lot  (samples
started  through the  extraction process on a
given 8  hr shift, to a maximum of 20). Spe-
cific selection of reagents and purification of
solvents by distillation in  all-glass systems
may be required. Glassware and, where pos-
sible, reagents are cleaned by solvent rinse
and baking at 450 °C for one hour minimum.
  3.2  Interferences coextracted from sam-
ples  will vary considerably from  source to
source, depending on the diversity of the in-
dustrial complex or municipality being sam-
ples.

                4.  Safety

  4.1  The  toxicity  or  carcinogenicity of
each compound or reagent used in this meth-
od has not been precisely determined; how-
ever,  each  chemical compound should be
treated as a potential health hazard. Expo-
sure to these compounds should be reduced
to the lowest possible level.  The laboratory
is responsible for maintaining a  current
awareness file of OSHA  regulations regard-
ing the safe handling of the chemicals speci-
fied in this method. A reference file of data
handling sheets should also  be made avail-
able to all personnel involved in these anal-
yses.  Additional information on laboratory
safety can be found in references 2-4.
  4.2  The following compounds covered by
this method have been tentatively classified
as known or suspected human or mammalian
carcinogens:  benzidine  benzo(a)anthracene,
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine, benzo(a)pyrene, diben-
zo(a,h)anthracene,  N-nitrosodimethylamine,
and  (3-naphtylamine.  Primary standards of
these compounds shall be prepared in a hood,
and a NIOSH/MESA approved toxic gas  res-
pirator should be worn when high concentra-
tions are handled.

        5.   Apparatus and Materials

  5.1  Sampling equipment  for discrete or
composite sampling.
  5.1.1  Sample bottle, amber glass, 1.1 liters
minimum. If amber bottles are not available,
samples shall be protected from light. Bot-
tles  are detergent water washed,  then  sol-
vent rinsed  or baked at 450 °C for one hour
minimum before use.
  5.1.2  Bottle caps—threaded to fit sample
bottles. Caps are  lined  with  Teflon. Alu-
minum foil may be substituted if the sample
is not corrosive. Liners are detergent water
washed, then reagent water (Section 6.5)  and
solvent  rinsed, and baked at approximately
200 °C for one hour  minimum before use.
  5.1.3  Compositing  equipment—automatic
or manual compositing system incorporating
glass containers for collection of a minimum
1.1 liters. Sample containers are kept at 0 to
4 °C during sampling. Glass or Teflon tubing
only shall be used.  If the sampler uses a peri-
staltic pump,  a minimum  length of com-
pressible silicone rubber tubing may be used
in the pump only. Before use,  the tubing is
thoroughly rinsed  with methanol, followed
by  repeated rinsings  with  reagent water
(Section 6.5) to minimize sample contamina-
tion. An integrating flow meter is used to
collect proportional composite samples.
                                         297

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  5.2  Continuous  liquid-liquid  extractor—
Teflon or glass conncecting joints and stop-
cooks  without lubrication (Hershberg-Wolf
Extractor) one liter capacity, Ace Glass 6841-
10, or equivalent.
  5.3  Drying column—15 to 20 mm i.d. Pyrex
chromatographic  column  equipped  with
coarse glass frit or glass wool plug.
  5.4  Kuderna-Danish (K-D) apparatus
  5.4.1  Concentrator tube—lOmL, graduated
(Kontes  K-570050-1025,  or equivalent)  with
calibration  verified.  Ground glass  stopper
(size 19/22 joint)  is  used to  prevent evapo-
ration of extracts.
  5.4.2  Evaporation flask—500  mL  (Kontes
K-570001-0500,  or  equivalent),  attached to
concentrator tube with springs (Kontes K-
662750-0012).
  5.4.3  Snyder  column—three  ball macro
(Kontes K-503000-0232, or equivalent).
  5.4.4  Snyder  column—two   ball  micro
(Kontes K-469002-0219, or equivalent).
  5.4.5  Boiling chips—approx 10/40 mesh, ex-
tracted with methylene chloride and baked
at 450 °C for one hr minimum.
  5.5  Water bath—heated, with  concentric
ring cover, capable of temperature control ±2
°C, installed in a fume hood.
  5.6  Sample vials—amber  glass,  2-5 mL
with Teflon-lined screw cap.
  5.7  Analytical balance—capable of weigh-
ing 0.1 mg.
  5.8  Gas     chromatograph—shall    have
splitless or  on-column  injection port  for
capillary column, temperature program with
30 °C hold, and shall meet all of the  perform-
ance specifications in Section 12.
  5.8.1  Column—30±5 mx0.25±0.02 mm i.d. 5%
phenyl, 94% methyl, 1% vinyl silicone bond-
ed phase fused silica capillary column (J & W
DB-5, or equivalent).
  5.9  Mass  spectrometer—70 eV electron im-
pact ionization, shall repetitively scan from
35 to 450 amu in 0.95 to 1.00 second, and shall
produce  a  unit  resolution (valleys  between
m/z 441-442 less than 10 percent of the height
of the 441 peak), backgound corrected mass
spectrum   from   50    ng   decafluorotri-
phenylphosphine     (DFTPP)     introduced
through  the GC inlet. The  spectrum  shall
meet the mass-intensity criteria in Table  5
(reference 5). The mass spectrometer shall be
interfaced to the GC such that the end of the
capillary column terminates within one cen-
timeter of the ion source but does not inter-
cept the electron or ion beams. All portions
of the column which connect the GC to the
ion source shall remain at or above the col-
umn temperature during analysis to preclude
condensation of less volatile compounds.
  5.10  Data system—shall collect and record
MS data, store mass-intensity data in spec-
tral libraries, process GC/MS data,  generate
reports,  and shall compute  and record re-
sponse factors.
  5.10.1 Data   acquisition—mass   spectra
shall be collected continuously throughout
the analysis and stored on a mass storage de-
vice.
  5.10.2  Mass spectral libraries—user  cre-
ated libraries containing mass spectra ob-
tained from analysis of authentic standards
shall be employed to  reverse search GC/MS
runs for the  compounds of interest (Section
7.2).
  5.10.3  Data processing—the  data  system
shall be used to search, locate, identify, and
quantify the compounds of interest in each
GC/MS analysis.  Software routines shall be
employed to compute retention times and
peak  areas.  Displays  of  spectra,   mass
chromatograms, and library comparisons are
required to verify results.
  5.10.4  Response factors  and  multipoint
calibrations—the data system shall be used
to record and maintain lists of response fac-
tors (response ratios for isotope dilution) and
multipoint  calibration curves  (Section 7).
Computations of relative  standard deviation
(coefficient of variation) are useful for test-
ing calibration linearity. Statistics  on ini-
tial (Section 8.2) and on-going (Section 12.7)
performance  shall be computed and main-
tained.

         6.  Reagents and Standards
  6.1  Sodium hydroxide—reagent grade, 6N
in reagent water.
  6.2  Sulfuric acid—reagent grade, 6N in re-
agent water.
  6.3  Sodium sulfate—reagent grade, granu-
lar anhydrous, rinsed with methylene  chlo-
ride (20 mL/g) and conditioned at 450 °C for
one hour minimum.
  6.4  Methylene  chloride—distilled  in  glass
(Burdick and Jackson, or equivalent).
  6.5  Reagent  water—water in which the
compounds of interest and  interfering com-
pounds are not detected by this method.
  6.6  Standard solutions—purchased as  so-
lutions  or mixtures  with  certification to
their purity,  concentration,  and  authen-
ticity, or prepared from materials of known
purity and composition. If compound purity
is 96 percent or greater, the weight may be
used without correction to compute the con-
centration of the standard. When not being
used, standards are stored in the dark at -20
to  —10 °C in screw-capped vials with Teflon-
lined lids. A mark is placed on the vial at the
level of the solution so that solvent evapo-
ration loss  can be  detected. The vials are
brought to room temperature prior  to use.
Any precipitate is redissolved and solvent is
added if solvent loss has occurred.
  6.7  Preparation of stock solutions—pre-
pare  in methylene  chloride,  benzene, p-
dioxane, or  a mixture of these  solvents per
the steps  below. Observe  the  safety  pre-
cautions in Section 4. The large number of
labeled and unlabeled acid, base/neutral, and
Appendix C  compounds  used for combined
calibration   (Section 7)   and  calibration
verification      (12.5)     require     high
                                          298

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
conoentratimns (approx 40 mg/mL) when in-
dividual stock  solutions  are prepared, so
that dilutions of mixtures will permit cali-
bration with all compounds in a single set of
solutions. The working range for most com-
pounds is 10-200 ng/mL. Compounds with a re-
duced MS response may be prepared at high-
er concentrations.
  6.7.1  Dissolve an  appropriate amount of
assayed reference material in a suitable sol-
vent. For example, weigh 400 mg naphthalene
in a 10 mL ground glass stoppered volumetric
flask and  fill  to the mark  with benzene.
After  the  naphthalene  is  completely  dis-
solved, transfer  the solution  to a 15 mL  vial
with Teflon-lined cap.
  6.7.2  Stock standard solutions  should be
checked for signs of degradation prior to the
preparation  of  calibration or performance
test standards.  Quality control check sam-
ples that can be used to determine the accu-
racy of calibration standards are  available
from  the   US  Environmental  Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Sup-
port Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
  6.7.3  Stock standard solutions shall be re-
placed after six months,  or  sooner if com-
parison with quality  control  check samples
indicates a change in concentration.
  6.8  Labeled compound  spiking solution—
from stock standard solutions prepared as
above,  or from mixtures, prepare the spiking
solution at  a concentration of 200 n.g/mL, or
at a concentration appropriate to the MS re-
sponse of each compound.
  6.9  Secondary standard—using stock solu-
tions  (Section  6.7),  prepare  a secondary
standard containing all of the compounds in
Tables 1 and 2  at  a concentration of 400 \igl
mL, or higher concentration  appropriate to
the MS response of the compound.
  6.10  Internal  standard  solution—prepare
2,2'-difluorobiphenyl  (DFB) at a concentra-
tion of 10 mg/mL in benzene.
  6.11  DFTPP solution—prepare at 50 ug/mL
in acetone.
  6.12  Solutions  for  obtaining  authentic
mass spectra (Section 7.2)—prepare  mixtures
of compounds at concentrations which  will
assure  authentic  spectra  are obtained for
storage in libraries.
  6.13  Calibration  solutions—combine  0.5
mL of the solution in Section 6.8 with 25, 50,
125, 250, and 500 uL of the solution in section
6.9 and bring to 1.00 mL total volume each.
This will produce calibration solutions of
nominal 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 ug/mL  of the
pollutants and a constant nominal 100 jig/mL
of the  labeled compounds. Spike each solu-
tion with 10 n,L of the internal standard solu-
tion (Section 6.10). These solutions permit
the relative response (labeled to unlabeled)
to be measured as a  function of concentra-
tion (Section 7.4).
  6.14  Precision  and  recovery  standard—
used for determination of initial (Section 8.2)
and on-going (Section 12.7) precision and re-
covery. This solution shall contain the pol-
lutants and labeled compounds at a nominal
concentration of 100 ug/mL.
  6.15  Stability  of solutions—all  standard
solutions (Sections 6.8-6.14) shall be analyzed
within  48  hours  of preparation and on  a
monthly basis thereafter  for signs of deg-
radation.  Standards will remain acceptable
if the peak area at the quantitation mass
relative to the DFB internal standard re-
mains within ±15  percent  of the  area ob-
tained in the initial analysis of the standard.

               7.   Calibration
  7.1  Assemble the GC/MS and establish the
operating  conditions in  Table  3.  Analyze
standards per the procedure in Section 11 to
demonstrate  that  the  analytical system
meets the detection limits in Tables 3 and 4,
and the mass-intensity criteria in Table 5 for
50 ng DFTPP.
  7.2  Mass spectral libraries—detection and
identification of  compounds of interest are
dependent  upon spectra stored in  user cre-
ated libraries.
  7.2.1 Obtain a mass spectrum of  each pol-
lutant,  labeled compound, and the  internal
standard by analyzing an authentic standard
either singly or as part of a mixture in which
there  is  no  interference   between closely
eluted components. That only a single com-
pound is present  is determined by  examina-
tion of the spectrum. Fragments not attrib-
utable to the compound under study indicate
the presence of an interfering compound.
  7.2.2 Adjust the analytical conditions and
scan rate  (for this test only) to  produce an
undistorted spectrum at the GC  peak max-
imum. An undistorted spectrum will usually
be obtained if five complete spectra are col-
lected across the  upper half of the  GC peak.
Software  algorithms designed  to "enhance"
the spectrum may  eliminate distortion, but
may also  eliminate authentic masses  or in-
troduce other distortion.
  7.2.3 The authentic reference spectrum is
obtained  under DFTPP tuning  conditions
(Section 7.1 and Table 5) to normalize it to
spectra from other instruments.
  7.2.4 The spectrum is edited by saving the
5 most intense mass spectral peaks and all
other mass spectral peaks greater than 10
percent of the base peak.  This edited spec-
trum is stored for reverse search  and for
compound confirmation.
  7.3  Analytical range—demonstrate that 20
ng anthracene or phenanthrene produces an
area at m/z 178  approx one-tenth that re-
quired to exceed the linear range of the sys-
tem. The exact value must be determined by
experience for each instrument. It is used to
match the calibration range of  the instru-
ment to the analytical range and detection
limits required, and to  diagnose  instrument
sensitivity problems (Section  15.4). The  20
ug/mL calibration standard (Section 6.13) can
be used to demonstrate this performance.
                                         299

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  7.3.1 Polar   compound   detection—dem-
onstrate that unlabeled  pentachlorophenol
and benzidine are detectable at the 50 ng/mL
level  (per all criteria in Section 13). The 50
Hg/mL calibration standard (Section 6.13) can
be used to demonstrate this performance.
  7.4  Calibration with isotope dilution—iso-
tope dilution is used when  (1) labeled com-
pounds are available, (2) interferences do not
preclude its  use,  and (3)  the quantitation
mass  extracted  ion current  profile  (EICP)
area for  the compound is in the calibration
range. If any of these conditions preclude
isotope  dilution, internal standard methods
(Section 7.5 or 7.6) are used.
  7.4.1 A  calibration curve  encompassing
the concentration range is prepared for each
compound to be determined. The relative re-
sponse (pollutant to labeled) vs concentra-
tion in standard solutions is plotted or com-
puted using a linear regression. The example
in Figure 1 shows a  calibration curve for phe-
nol using phenol-d5 as the isotopic diluent.
Also shown are the ± 10 percent error limits
(dotted lines). Relative Reponse (RR) is de-
termined according to the  procedures de-
scribed   below.  A  minimum of  five  data
points are employed for calibration.
  7.4.2 The relative response of a pollutant
to its labeled analog is determined from iso-
tope ratio values computed  from acquired
data.  Three isotope ratios are  used  in this
process:
  Rx =  the isotope  ratio measured for the
pure pollutant.
  Ry = the isotope ratio measured for the la-
beled  compound.
  Rm  =  the isotope ratio  of an analytical
mixture  of pollutant and labeled compounds.
  The m/z's are selected such that Rx> Ry. If
Rm is  not between 2Ry and 0.5RX, the method
does not apply and the sample is analyzed by
internal  or external standard methods.
  7.4.3 Capillary columns usually separate
the pollutant-labeled pair, with the  labeled
compound  eluted first (Figure  2).  For this
case, Rx  = [area mi/z]/l, at the retention time
of the pollutant (RT2). Ry = l/[area m2/z, at
the retention time  of the labeled compound
RTO.  Rm = [area at mi/z (at RT2)]/[area at
RTO], as measured in the mixture of the pol-
lutant and labeled compounds (Figure 2), and
RR = Rm.
  7.4.4 Special precautions are taken when
the pollutant-labeled pair is  not separated,
or  when another  labeled  compound  with
interfering spectral masses overlaps the pol-
lutant (a case which can occur with isomeric
compounds). In this case, it is necessary to
determine  the  respective  contributions of
the pollutant and labeled compounds to the
respective EICP areas. If the peaks are sepa-
rated well enough to permit the data system
or operator to  remove the  contributions of
the compounds to  each other, the equations
in Section 7.4.3 apply.  This usually occurs
when the height of the valley between the
two GC peaks at the same m/z is less than 10
percent of the  height  of the shorter of the
two  peaks.  If  significant  GC  and spectral
overlap occur, RR is computed using the fol-
lowing equation:
  RR = (R y - Rn,) (Rx  + l)/(Rm - Rx) (Ry + 1),
where Rx is measured as shown in Figure 3A,
Ry is measured as shown in Figure 3B, and
Rm is measured as  shown in Figure 3C. For
example, Rx =  46100/4780 = 9.644, Ry  = 2650/
43600 = 0.0608, Rm = 49200/48300 = 1.019. amd RR
= 1.114.
  7.4.5 To calibrate the analytical system
by isotope dilution, analyze a 1.0 nL aliquot
of each of the calibration standards (Section
6.13) using the procedure in Section 11. Com-
pute the RR at each concentration.
  7.4.6 Linearity—if the ratio of relative re-
sponse to concentration for any compound is
constant (less than 20  percent coefficient of
variation) over  the 5 point calibration range,
and averaged relative response/concentration
ratio may be used for that  compound; other-
wise, the complete calibration curve for that
compound shall be used over the 5 point cali-
bration range.
  7.5  Calibration by internal standard—used
when criteria for istope dilution (Section 7.4)
cannot be met. The internal standard to be
used for both acid and base/neutral analyses
is 2,2'-difluorobiphenyl. The internal stand-
ard method is also  applied to determination
of compounds having no labeled analog, and
to measurement of labeled  compounds for
intra-laboratory statistics  (Sections 8.4 and
12.7.4).
  7.5.1 Response  factors—calibration  re-
quires the determination of response factors
(RF)  which  are  defined  by  the  following
equation:
  RF = (A, x C1S)/(A,,  x Cs), where
  A, is the area  of the characteristic mass for
   the compmund in the daily standard
  A,,  is the area of the characteristic mass
   for the internal  standard
  C,s  is the  concentration of  the internal
   standard (ng/mL)
  Cs is the concentration of the compound in
   the daily standard (ng/mL)
  7.5.1.1  The response factor is determined
for  at least five  concentrations appropriate
to the response of  each compound (Section
6.13);  nominally, 10,  20,  50, 100, and 200 ng/mL.
The  amount of internal standard  added to
each extract is  the  same (100 ng/mL) so that
C,s remains constant.  The  RF  is plotted vs
concentration  for  each compound in  the
standard (Cs) to produce a calibration curve.
  7.5.1.2  Linearity—if  the  response factor
(RF) for any compound is constant (less than
35 percent coefficient of variation) over the 5
point  calibration range,  an averaged re-
sponse factor may be used for that  com-
pound; otherwise, the  complete calibration
                                          300

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
curve for that compound shall be used over
the 5 point range.
  7.6  Combined calibration—by  using  cali-
bration solutions  (Section  6.13)  containing
the pollutants, labeled compounds, and the
internal standard, a  single set of analyses
can be used to produce calibration curves for
the isotope dilution  and internal standard
methods. These curves are verified each shift
(Section 12.5) by  analyzing- the 100 ug/mL
calibration  standard  (Section  6.13).   Re-
calibration is required  only  if  calibration
verification (Section 12.5) criteria cannot be
met.

    8.  Quality Assurance/Quality Control
  8.1  Each laboratory that uses this method
is required to operate a formal quality assur-
ance  program.  The minimum  requirements
of this program consist  of an initial dem-
onstration of laboratory capability, analysis
of samples spiked with labeled compounds to
evaluate  and  document  data  quality,  and
analysis of standards and blanks as tests of
continued performance. Laboratory perform-
ance is compared to established performance
criteria to determine if the results of anal-
yses meet the performance characteristics of
the method.
  8.1.1 The analyst shall make  an  initial
demonstration of the ability to generate ac-
ceptable accuracy and precision  with this
method. This  ability  is  established  as de-
scribed in Section 8.2.
  8.1.2  The analyst  is permitted  to  modify
this method to improve separations or lower
the costs of measurements, provided all per-
formance specifications are met. Each time a
modification is made to the method, the ana-
lyst is required to repeat the procedure in
Section 8.2 to  demonstrate method perform-
ance.
  8.1.3 Analyses of blanks  are required to
demonstrate  freedom from contamination.
The procedures and criteria for analysis of a
blank are described in Section 8.5.
  8.1.4  The laboratory shall spike all sam-
ples with labeled  compounds to monitor
method performance. This test is described
in Section 8.3. When  results of these spikes
indicate atypical  method performance for
samples, the samples are diluted to bring
method performance within acceptable lim-
its (Section 15).
  8.1.5 The laboratory shall, on an on-going
basis,   demonstrate   through  calibration
verification and the analysis of the precision
and recovery standard (Section 6.14) that the
analysis system is in control.  These proce-
dures are described in Sections 12.1, 12.5, and
12.7.
  8.1.6 The  laboratory   shall   maintain
records to define the  quality of data  that is
generated. Development of accuracy state-
ments is described in Section 8.4.
  8.2  Initial precision and accuracy—to es-
tablish  the ability to  generate  acceptable
precision  and accuracy,  the analyst shall
perform the following operations:
  8.2.1 Extract,  concentrate,  and  analyze
two sets of four one-liter aliquots (8 aliquots
total) of the precision and recovery standard
(Section 6.14) according" to the procedure in
Section 10.
  8.2.2 Using results of the first set of four
analyses,  compute the average recovery (X)
in jj.g/mL  and the standard deviation of the
recovery (s) in flg/nL for each compound, by
isotope dilution for pollutants with a labeled
analog, and by internal standard for labeled
compounds and  pollutants  with no labeled
analog.
  8.2.3 For each compound, compare s and X
with the corresponding- limits for initial pre-
cision and accuracy in Table 8. If s and X for
all compounds meet  the acceptance criteria,
system performance  is acceptable and anal-
ysis  of blanks  and  samples may begin. If,
however, any individual s exceeds the preci-
sion limit or any individual X falls outside
the range for accuracy, system performance
is unacceptable for that compound.
  NOTE: The large number of compounds in
Table  8  present a  substantial  probability
that one or more will fail the acceptance cri-
teria when all compounds are analyzed. To
determine if the analytical  system is out of
control, or if the failure can be attributed to
probability, proceed as follows:
  8.2.4 Using the results of the second set of
four analyses,  compute  s  and X for  only
those compounds which failed the test of the
first set  of four  analyses (Section 8.2.3). If
these compounds now pass,  system perform-
ance  is acceptable  for all compounds  and
analysis of blanks and samples may begin. If,
however,  any  of the same  compoulds  fail
again, the analysis system is not performing
properly for these compounds. In this event,
correct the problem and repeat the entire
test (Section 8.2.1).
  8.3  The laboratory shall spike all samples
with  labeled compounds  to assess  method
performance on the sample matrix.
  8.3.1 Analyze  each sample according  to
the method in Section 10.
  8.3.2 Compute the percent recovery (P) of
the  labeled compounds  using the internal
standard methmd (Section 7.5).
  8.3.3 Compare  the labeled compound re-
covery for each compound with the  cor-
responding limits in  Table 8. If the recovery
of any compounds falls outside its warning-
limit,  method performance is  unacceptable
for that compound in that sample, Therefore,
the sample is complex and is to be diluted
and reanalyzed per Section 15.4.
  8.4  As part of the  QA program for the lab-
oratory,  method accuracy for wastewater
samples shall be assessed and records shall
be maintained.  After the  analysis  of five
wastewater samples   for  which the  labeled
compounds pass  the tests in  Section  8.3,
compute  the average percent recovery (P)
                                         301

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth.  1625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
and the standard deviation of the percent re-
covery (Sp) for the labeled compounds only.
Express the accuracy assessment as a per-
cent recovery interval from P—2 sp to P+2sp.
For example, if P=90% and Sp=10%, the accu-
racy interval is expressed as 70-100%. Update
the accuracy assessment for  each compound
on a regular basis (e.g. after each 5-10 new
accuracy measurements).
  8.5  Blanks—reagent water blanks are ana-
lyzed to demonstrate freedom from contami-
nation.
  8.5.1  Extract and concentrate  a  blank
with  each  sample  lot  (samples  started
through the extraction process on the same
8 hr shift, to a maximum of 20 samples). Ana-
lyze  the blank immediately after analysis of
the precision and recovery standard  (Section
6.14)  to  demonstrate freedom from  contami-
nation.
  8.5.2  If any  of the compounds of interest
(Tables  1 and 2)  or  any potentially  inter-
fering compound is found In a blank at great-
er than 10 ng/L (assuming a  response factor
of 1  relative  to the internal standard for
compounds not listed  in  Tables 1 and  2),
analysis of samples is halted until the source
of contamination  is eliminated and a blank
shows no  evidence of contamination at this
level.
  8.6  The specifications  contained in this
method can be met if the apparatus used is
calibrated properly,  then maintained  in  a
calibrated state. The standards used for cali-
bration  (Section 7), calibration verification
(Section 12.5), and for initial (Section 8.2)
and on-going (Section 12.7) precision and re-
covery should be identical, so that  the most
precise results will be obtained. The GC/MS
instrument  in particular will  provide  the
most reproducible  results if dedicated to the
settings and conditions required for the anal-
ysis of semi-volatiles by this method.
  8.7  Depending  on specific  program re-
quirements, field replicates may be collected
to determine  the  precision of the sampling
technique, and spiked  samples may be re-
quired to determine  the accuracy of  the
analysis when internal or external standard
methods are used.
    9.
       Sample Collection, Preservation, and
                 Handling
  9.1  Collect  samples  in glass containers
following conventional  sampling  practices
(Reference 7).  Composite  samples are  col-
lected in refrigerated glass containers (Sec-
tion 5.1.3)  in  accordance with  the require-
ments of the sampling program.
  9.2  Maintain samples at 0-4  °C  from the
time collectimn until extraction. If residual
chlorine is  present,  add  80  mg sodium
thiosulfate per liter of water. EPA Methods
330.4 and 330.5 may be used to measure resid-
ual chlorine (Reference 8).
  9.3  Begin sample extraction within seven
days of collection, and analyze all extracts
within 40 days of extraction.

 10.  Sample Extraction and Concentration (See
                 Figure 4)

  10.1  Labeled compound  spiking—measure
1.00 ± 0.01 liter of sample  into a glass con-
tainer. For untreated effluents, and samples
which are expected to be difficult to extract
and/or concentrate,  measure  an additional
10.0 ± 0.1 mL and dilute to a final volume of
1.00 ± 0.01 liter with reagent water in a glass
container.
  10.1.1  For each sample or sample lot (to a
maximum of 20) to be extracted at the same
time, place three 1.00 ± 0.10 liter aliquots of
reagent water in glass containers.
  10.1.2  Spike 0.5 mL  of  the labeled com-
pound spiking solution  (Section 6.8) into all
samples and one reagant water aliquot.
  10.1.3  Spike 1.0 mL of the precision  and
recovery standard (Section 6.14) into the two
remaining reagent water aliquots.
  10.1.4  Stir and equilibrate all solutions for
1-2 hr.
  10.2  Base/neutral extraction—place 100-150
mL methylene chloride in each  continuous
extractor and 200-300 in each distilling flask.
  10.2.1  Pour  the sample(s),  blank,  and
standard aliquots into the extractors. Rinse
the glass containers with 50-100 mL  meth-
ylene chloride and add  to the respective ex-
tractor.
  10.2.2  Adjust the pH  of the waters in the
extractors to 12-13 with 6N NaOH while mon-
itoring with a pH meter. Begin the extrac-
tion by heating the flask  until the  meth-
ylene chloride is boiling. When properly ad-
justed, 1-2 drops  of methylene chloride per
second will fall from the coudensor tip  into
the water. After 1-2 hours of extraction,  test
the pH and readjust to  12-13 if required. Ex-
tract for 18-24 hours.
  10.2.3  Remove  the  distilling flask,  esti-
mate and record  the volume  of  extract (to
the nearest 100 mL), and pour the contents
through a drying column containing 7 to 10
cm anhydrous sodium sulfate. Rinse the dis-
tilling flask  with 30-50 mL  of methylene
chloride  and  pour  through the drying  col-
umn. Collect the solution in a 500 mL  K-D
evaporator flask equipped with a 10 mL con-
centrator tube. Seal, label as the base/neu-
tral fraction, and concentrate per Sections
10.4 to 10.5.
  10.3  Acid extraction—adjust the pH of the
waters in the extractors to 2 or less using 6N
sulfuric acid. Charge clean distilling  flasks
with 300-400 mL of methylene chloride. Test
and  adjust the pH of the waters after the
first 1-2 hr of extraction.  Extract for 18-24
hours.
  10.3.1  Repeat Section 10.2.3, except label
as the acid fraction.
                                          302

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
  10.4  Concentration—concentrate  the  ex-
tracts  in  separate  500  mL  K-D flasks
equipped with 10 mL concentrator tubes.
  10.4.1 Add 1 to 2 clean boiling chips to the
flask and attach a three-ball macro Snyder
column. Prewet  the column  by adding ap-
proximately one  mL of methylene  chloride
through the top.  Place the K-D apparatus in
a hot  water bath so that the entire lower
rounded surface  of the flask is bathed with
steam. Adjust the vertical position of the ap-
paratus and the water  temperature as re-
quired to complete the concentration in 15 to
20 minutes.  At the proper rate of distillation,
the balls of the column will actively chatter
but  the chambers will  not flood. When the
liquid  has reached an  apparent volume of 1
mL, remove the K-D  apparatus from  the
bath and allow the solvent to drain and cool
for at  least 10 minutes.  Remove the Snyder
column and rinse the  flask  and its lower
joint into the concentrator tube with 1-2 mL
of methylene chloride. A 5-mL syringe is rec-
ommended for this operation.
  10.4.2 For performance  standards (Sec-
tions 8.2 and 12.7) and for blanks (Section
8.5), combine the acid and base/neutral ex-
tracts for each at this point. Do not combine
the  acid and base/neutral extracts for sam-
ples.
  10.5  Add  a clean boiling chip and attach a
two  ball micro Snyder column to the concen-
trator tube. Prewet the column by adding
approx  0.5 mL methylene chloride  through
the top. Place the apparatus in the hot water
bath. Adjust the vertical  position  and the
water  temperature as  required to complete
the  concentration in 5-10 minutes.  At  the
proper rate  of distillation,  the balls of the
column will actively chatter but the cham-
bers will not flood. When the liquid reaches
an apparent volume of  approx 0.5  mL, re-
move the apparatus from the water bath and
allow to drain and cool for at least 10 min-
utes. Remove the micro Snyder column and
rinse its lower joint into  the concentrator
tube with approx 0.2 mL of methylene chlo-
ride. Adjust the final volume to 1.0 mL.
  10.6  Transfer the concentrated extract to
a clean screw-cap vial. Seal the  vial with a
Teflon-lined lid,  and mark the level on the
vial. Label with the sample number and frac-
tion, and store in the dark at - 20 to  -10 °C
until ready  for analysis.

            11,  GC/MS Analysis

  11.1  Establish  the  operating  conditions
given in Table 3 or 4 for analysis  of the base/
neutral or  acid  extracts, respectively. For
analysis  of combined  extracts  (Section
10.4.2), use the operating conditions in Table
3.
  11.2  Bring the  concentrated extract (Sec-
tion 10.6) or standard (Sections 6.13  through
6.14) to room temperature  and  verify  that
any  precipitate has  redissolved.  Verify  the
level on the extract (Sections 6.6 and  10.6)
and bring  to  the  mark with solvent if re-
quired.
  11.3  Add the internal standard solution
(Section 6.10) to the extract (use 1.0 uL of so-
lution per 0.1  mL of  extract) immediately
prior to injection to minimize the possibility
of loss by  evaporation, adsorption, or reac-
tion. Mix thoroughly.
  11.4  Inject a volume of the standard solu-
tion or extract such that 100 ng of the inter-
nal standard will  be injected, using  on-col-
umn  or  splitless  injection. For 1 mL  ex-
tracts, this volume will be 1.0 uL. Start the
GC column initial isothermal hold upon in-
jection. Start MS data collection after the
solvent peak  elutes.  Stop data collection
after  the   benzo    (ghi)   perylene   or
pentachlorophenol peak elutes for the base/
neutral or acid fraction, respectively.  Return
the  column to  the  initial  temperature for
analysis of the next sample.

    12. System and Laboratory Performance

  12.1  At the beginning of each 8 hr shift
during which analyses  are performed,  GC/MS
system   performance  and  calibration are
verified for all pollutants  and labeled com-
pounds. For these tests, analysis of the 100
tig/mil calibration standard  (Section 6.13)
shall be  used  to verify all performance cri-
teria. Adjustment and/or recalibration (per
Section 7)  shall be performed until all per-
formance criteria are met. Only after all per-
formance criteria  are met  may  samples,
blanks, and precision and recovery standards
be analyzed.
  12.2  DFTPP spectrum validity—inject  1
M.L  of the DFTPP  solution (Section 6.11) ei-
ther separately or within a few seconds of in-
jection of  the standard (Section 12.1) ana-
lyzed at the beginning  of each shift. The cri-
teria in Table 5 shall be met.
  12.3 Retention times—the absolute reten-
tion time  of  2,2'-difluorobiphenyl  shall be
within the range of 1078 to 1248 seconds and
the relative retention times of all pollutants
and labeled compounds shall fall within the
limits given in Tables 3 and 4.
  12.4 GC  resolution—the valley height be-
tween anthracene  and phenanthrene  at m/z
178 (or the analogs at  m/z  188) shall not ex-
ceed 10 percent of the taller of the two peaks.
  12.5 Calibration     verification—compute
the concentration of each pollutant  (Tables 1
and 2) by isotope  dilution (Section 7.4) for
those  compounds  which   have   labeled
analogs.  Compute  the  concentration of each
pollutant which has no labeled analog by the
internal standard method (Section 7.5). Com-
pute the concentration of the labeled com-
pounds  by  the  internal  standard  method.
These concentrations are computed based on
the calibration data determined in Section 7.
  12.5.1  For each pollutant and labeled com-
pound being tested, compare the concentra-
tion with the calibration verification limit
                                         303

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
in Table 8. If all compounds meet the accept-
ance criteria,  calibration has been verified
and analysis of blanks, samples, and preci-
sion and recovery standards may proceed. If,
however, any  compound fails, the measure-
ment system is not performing  properly for
that compound. In this event, prepare a fresh
calibration standard or correct  the problem
causing the failure and repeat the test (Sec-
tion 12.1),  or recalibrate (Section 7).
  12.6  Multiple peaks—each compound in-
jected  shall give a single, distinct GC peak.
  12.7   On-going precision and accuracy.
  12.7.1 Analyze the  extract of one  of the
pair of precision and recovery  standards
(Section 10.1.3) prior to analysis of samples
from the same lot.
  12.7.2 Compute the concentration of  each
pollutant  (Tables 1 and 2) by isotope dilution
(Section 7.4) for those compounds which  have
labeled analogs. Compute the concentration
of each pollutant which has no  labeled ana-
log by  the internal standard method (Section
7.5). Compute  the concentration of the la-
beled  compounds  by  the internal standard
method.
  12.7.3 For each pollutant and labeled com-
pound, compare the  concentration with the
limits  for  on-going accuracy in Table 8. If all
compounds  meet  the  acceptance  criteria,
system performance  is acceptable and anal-
ysis of blanks  and samples may proceed. If,
however, any  individual concentration  falls
outside of the range given, system perform-
ance is unacceptable for that compound.
  NOTE: The large number of compounds in
TaWe  8 present a substantial probability
that one  or more will fail  when all com-
pounds are analyzed. To determine if the ex-
traction/concentration system is out of con-
trol or if the failure is caused by probability,
proceed as follows:
  12.7.3.1  Analyze the second aliquot of the
pair of precision and recovery standard (Sec-
tion 10.1.3).
  12.7.3.2  Compute  the  concentration  of
only those pollutants  or labeled compounds
that failed the previous test (Section 12.7.3).
If these compounds now pass, the extraction/
concentration  processes are in  control  and
analysis of blanks and samples may proceed.
If, however, any of the same compounds fail
again,   the extraction/concentration  proc-
esses  are  not being  performed  properly for
these compounds.  In this event, correct the
problem, re-extract the sample  lot (Section
10) and repeat the on-going precision and re-
covery test (Section 12.7).
  12.7.4 Add results  which pass the speci-
fications in Section 12.7.2 to initial and pre-
vious  on-going data.  Update QC charts to
perform a graphic representation  of contin-
ued laboratory performance (Figure 5). De-
velop a statement of laboratory  accuracy for
each pollutant and labeled compound by cal-
culating the  average  percent  recovery (R)
and the standard deviation of percent recov-
ery (ST). Express the accuracy as a recovery
interval from R-2s, to R+2Sr. For example, if
R=95% and Sr=5%, the accuracy is 85-105%.

       13.  Qualitative Determination

  13.1  Quantitative determination is  ac-
complished by comparison of data from anal-
ysis of a sample or blank with data from
analysis  of the shift standard (Section 12.1)
and with data stored in the spectral libraries
(Section  7.2.4). Identification is confirmed
when spectra and retention times agree per
the criteria below.
  13.2  Labeled compounds  and pollutants
having no labeled analog:
  13.2.1  The signals  for  all characteristic
masses stored in the spectral library (Sec-
tion 7.2.4) shall be  present and shall maxi-
mize within the same two consecutive scans.
  13.2.2  Either (1) the background corrected
EICP areas, or (2) the corrected relative in-
tensities of the mass spectral peaks at the
GC peak maximum  shall agree within a fac-
tor of two  (0.5 to  2 times) for all masses
stored in the library.
  13.2.3  The retention time relative to the
nearest eluted internal standard  shall be
within ±15 scans or ±15 seconds, whichever is
greater of this difference in the shift stand-
ard (Section 12.1).
  13.3  Pollutants having a labled analog:
  13.3.1  The signals  for  all characteristic
masses stored in the spectral library (Sec-
tion 7.2.4) shall be  present and shall maxi-
mize within the same two consecutive scans.
  13.3.2.  Either (1) the background corrected
EICP areas, or (2) the corrected relative in-
tensities of the mass spectral peaks at the
GC peak maximum  shall agree within a fac-
tor of two for all masses stored in  the spec-
tral library.
  13.3.3.  The retention time difference be-
tween the pollutant and  its labeled analog
shall agree  within ± 6 scans or ± 6 seconds
(whichever is greater) of this difference in
the shift standard (Section 12.1).
  13.4  Masses present in  the experimental
mass spectrum that are not present in the
reference mass spectrum shall be accounted
for by contaminant or background ions. If
the experimental mass spectrum is contami-
nated, an  experienced spectrometrist  (Sec-
tion 1.4)  is to determine the presence or ab-
sence of the cmmpound.

       14.  Quantitative Determination

  14.1  Isotope  dilution—by adding a known
amount of a labeled compound to every sam-
ple prior to extraction, correction for recov-
ery of the pollutant can be made because the
pollutant and its labeled  analog exhibit the
same effects upon extraction, concentration,
and gas  chromatography. Relative response
(RR) values for mixtures are used in conjunc-
tion  with calibration  curves described  in
                                          304

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
             Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
Section 7.4 to  determine concentrations di-
rectly, so long as labeled compound spiking
levels are constant. For the phenml example
given in Figure 1 (Section 7.4.1), RR would be
equal to  1.114. For this RR value, the phenol
calibration curve given in Figure 1 indicates
a concentration of 27 ng/mL in the sample ex-
tract (Cex).
  14.2  Internal standard—compute the con-
centration in the extract using the response
factor determined  from  calibration  data
(Section 7.5) and  the following equation:
Cex(|j.g/mL)=(Aa  x C,S/(A,S x RF) where Cex is the
concentration  of the  compound in the ex-
tract, and  the  other terms are as defined in
Section 7.5.1.
  14.3  The concentration of the pollutant in
water is  computed using the volumes  of the
original water  sample (Section 10.1) and the
final  extract volume  (Section 10.5),  as fol-
lows: Concentration  in  water ()ig/L)=(Ce, x
Vex)/Vs where Vcx  is the extract volume in
mL, and V, is the sample volume in liters.
  14.4  If the EICP area at the quantitiation
mass for any compound exceeds the calibra-
tion range of the system, the extract  of the
dilute aliquot  (Section 10.1) is analyzed by
isotope dilution; otherwise, the extract is di-
luted by a factor of 10, 9 uL of internal  stand-
ard solution (Section 6.10) are added to a 1.0
mL aliquot,  and this diluted extract is ana-
lyzed by the internal standard method (Sec-
tion 14.2).  Quantify each compound at the
highest concentration level within the cali-
bration range.
  14.5  Report results for all pollutants and
labeled compounds (Tables 1 and 2) found in
all standards, blanks, and samples in ug/L, to
three significant figures. Results for samples
which have been diluted are reported at the
least dilute  level  at  which the area at the
quantitation mass is within the  calibration
range  (Section 14.4)  and the  labeled com-
pound recovery is within the normal range
for the method  (Section 15.4).

       15.  Analysis of Complex Samples
  15.1  Untreated  effluents  and other sam-
ples frequently contain high levels (>1000 ug/
L) of the compounds  of interest, interfering
compounds,  and/or  polymeric  materials.
Some samples  will not concentrate to  one
mL (Section 10.5); others will overload the
GO column and/or mass spectrometer.
  15.2  Analyze  the dilute aliquot (Section
10.1) when the sample will not concentrate to
1.0 mL. If a dilute aliquot was not extracted,
and the sample  holding time (Section 9.3) has
not been exceeded, dilute an  aliquot of the
sample with reagent  water and re-extract
(Section  10.1);  otherwise,  dilute the extract
(Section  14.4) and analyze  by the internal
standard method (Section 14.2).
  15.3  Recovery of internal standard— the
EICP area of the internal standard should be
within a factor  of two of the area in the shift
standard (Section 12.1). If the absolute areas
of the labeled compounds are within a factor
of two  of the respective areas in  the  shift
standard, and the internal standard area is
less than one-half of its respective area, then
internal standard loss in the extract has oc-
curred.  In this case,  use one of the labeled
compounds  (perferably  a  polynuclear aro-
matic hydrocarbon)  to compute  the  con-
centration of a  pollutant with no  labeled
analog.
  15.4 Recovery  of labeled compounds— in
most samples, labeled compound recoveries
will  be  similar to those from reagent water
(Section 12.7). If the labeled compound recov-
ery is outside the limits given in Table 8, the
dilute extract (Section 10.1) is analyzed as in
Section 14.4. If the recoveries  of all labeled
compounds and the internal staldard are low
(per  the criteria above), then a loss in instru-
ment sensitivity is the most likely  cause. In
this  case, the 100  fig/mL calibration standard
(Section 12.1) shall be analyzed and calibra-
tion  verified (Section 12.5). If a loss in sensi-
tivity has occurred, the  instrument shall be
repaired, the performance specifications in
Section 12 shall be met, and the extract re-
analyzed. If a loss in instrument sensitivity
has not occurred, the method does not work
on the sample being analyzed and the result
may not be reported  for regulatory compli-
ance purposes.

          16.  Method Performance
  16.1 Interlaboratory performance for this
method is detailed in references 9 and 10.
  16.2 A chromatogram of  the 100 |ig/mL
acid/base/neutral  calibration standard (Sec-
tion  6.13) is shown in Figure 6.

               REFERENCES

  1. "Performance Tests for the Evaluation of
Computerized  Gas   Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry Equipment and  Laboratories"
USEPA,  EMSL/Cincinnati, OH 45268, EPA-
600/4-80-025 (April 1980).
  2.  "Working  with  Carcinogens,"  DHEW,
PHS, CDC, NIOSH, Publication 77-206, (Au-
gust 1977).
  3.  "OSHA   Safety and Health Standards,
General  Industry" OSHA 2206, 29 CFR part
1910 (January 1976).
  4. "Safety  in Academic Chemistry Labora-
tories, " ACS Committee on Chemical Safety
(1979).
  5. "Reference Compound to Calibrate Ion
Abundance  Measurement  in  Gas  Chroma-
tography-Mass Spectrometry Systems," J.W.
Eichelberger, L.E. Harris,  and W.L. Budde,
Anal. Chem., 47, 955 (1975).
  6. "Handbook of Analytical Quality Control
in Water  and  Wastewater  Laboratories,"
USEPA,  EMSL/Cincinnati, OH  45268,  EPA-
600/4-79-019 (March 1979).
  7. "Standard Practice for Sampling Water,"
ASTM Annual  Book  of Standards, ASTM,
Philadelphia, PA, 76 (1980).
                                         305

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  8. "Methods 330.4 and 330.5 for Total Resid-
ual Chlorine," USEPA, EMSL/ Cincinnati, OH
45268, EPA 600/4-70-020 (March 1979).
  9.  Colby, B.N., Beimer, R.G., Rushneck,
D.R., and Telliard,  W.A.,  "Isotope Dilution
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for
the determination of Priority  Pollutants in
Industrial  Effluents."  USEPA,   Effluent
Guidelines  Division, Washington, DC 20460
(1980).
  10. "Inter-laboratory Validation of US En-
vironmental  Protection  Agency   Method
1625," USEPA, Effluent Guidelines Division,
Washington, DC 20460 (June 15, 1984).
                    TABLE 1—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
Compound

Acenaphthylene . 	 	 .... . .
Anthracene . 	 	 	
Benzidme 	 	 	
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ... 	 	
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 	
Benzo(a)pyrene 	 	 	
Benzo(ghi)perylene 	 	 	
Biphenyl (Appendix C) 	 ... ...
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 	 	 .. 	
Bis(2-chloroethyoxy)methane . ... 	
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether . . ... 	 	
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

Butyl benzyl phthalate 	 	 —
n-C10 (Appendix C) 	 	 	
n-C14 (Appendix C) 	 . 	
n-C18 (Appendix C) . . 	 	
n-C20 (Appendix C)
n-C22 (Appendix C) 	 	
n-C24 (Appendix C) 	 	
n-C28 (Appendix C) .... . . . . .
n-C30 (Appendix C) . . . .. 	
Carbazole (4c) 	 . . ...
2-chloronaphthalene .. . . 	
Chrysene ... 	 	 	
P-cymene (Appendix C} 	 	 	
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 	 ...

Di-n-butyl phthalate 	 	 	
1 ,2-dichlorobenzene . 	 ....
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene 	 	
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene . . 	
Diethyl phthalate 	 ... 	
2,4-dimethylphenol . 	 .
Dimethyl phthalate . 	
2,4-dinrtrotoluene 	 .... 	 	

Diphenylamme (Appendix C) 	 	
Diphenyl ether (Appendix C) .... 	
1 ,2-diphenylhydrazme . . . 	

Hexachlorobenzene ... 	 	
Hexachlorobutadiene 	 	 . . .
Hexachloroethane 	 .... 	 	
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 	 .... 	
Naphthalene 	 	 	
B-naphthylamme (Appendix C) 	 	
Nitrobenzene 	 	 	
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamme 	 	 	
N-mtrosodiphenylamine 	 	 	
STORET
34205
34200
34220
39120
34526
34230
34242
34247
34521
81513
34273
34278
34283
39100
34636
34292
77427
77588
77691
77757
77804
77830
77859
77886
77901
78116
78117
77571
34581
34641
34320
77356
34556
81302
77639
39110
34536
34566
34571
34631
34336
34606
34341
34611
34626
34596
77579
77587
34346
34376
34381
39700
34391
34396
34386
34403
34408
34696
82553
34447
34438
34428
34433
CAS reg-
istry
83-32-9
208-96-8
120-12-7
92-87-5
56-55-3
205-99-2
207-08-9
50-32-8
191-24-2
92-52-4
111-44-^
111-91-1
108-60-1
117-81-7
101-55-3
85-68-7
124-18-5
112-40-2
629-59-4
544-76-3
593-45-3
112-95-8
629-97-0
646-31-1
630-01-3
630-02-4
638-68-6
86-74-8
91-58-7
7005-72-3
218-01-9
99-87-6
53-70-3
132-64-9
132-65-0
84-74-2
95-50-1
541-73-1
106-^t6-7
91-94-1
84-66-2
105-67-9
131-11-3
121-14-2
606-20-2
117-84-0
122-39-4
101-84-8
122-66-7
206-44-0
86-73-7
118-74-1
87-68-3
67-72-1
77_47_4
193-39-5
78-59-1
91-20-3
91-59-8
98-45-3
62-75-9
621-64-7
86-30-3
EPA-
EGD
001 B
077 B
078 B
005 B
072 B
074 B
075 B
073 B
079 B
512 B
018 B
043 B
042 B
066 B
041 B
067 B
517 B
506 B
518 B
519 B
520 B
521 B
522 B
523 B
524 B
525 B
526 B
528 B
020 B
040 B
076 B
513 B
082 B
505 B
504 8
068 B
025 B
026 B
027 B
028 B
070 B
034 A
071 B
035 B
036 B
069 B
507 B
508 B
037 B
039 B
080 B
009 B
052 B
012 B
053 B
083 B
054 B
055 B
502 B
056 B
061 B
063 B
062 B
NPDES
001 B
002 B
003 B
004B
005 B
007 B
009 B
006 B
008 B

011 B
010 B
012 B
013 B
014 B
015 B



016 B
017 B
018 B
01 9 B

026 B
020 B
021 B
022 B
023 B
024 B
003 A
025 B
027 B
028 B
029 B
030 B
031 B
032 B
033 B
034 B
036 B
035 B
037 B
038 B
039 B
040 B
041 B
042 B
043 B
                                        306

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
             TABLE 1—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS—Continued
Compound
Phenanthrene 	 	 	 	
Phenol 	 	 	
a-Picoline (Synfuel) 	 	
styrene (Appendix C) 	 ... . 	
a-terpmeol (Appendix C) ... 	
1,2,3-tnchlorobenzene(4c) 	 	 ...

STORET
34461
34694
77088
34469
77128
77493
77613
34551

CAS reg-
istry
85-01-8
108-95-2
109-06-89
129-00-0
100-42-5
98-55-5
87-61-6
120-82-1

EPA-
EGD
081 B
065 A
503 B
084 B
510 B
509 B
529 B
008 B

NPDES
044 B
010 A
045 B

046 B

                     TABLE 2—ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
Compound
4-chloro-3-methylphenol 	 	
2,4-dichlorophenol 	 ...
2,4-dmitrophenol 	 	
2-methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol 	


2,3,6-tnchlorophenol (4c) 	 	 	
2,4,5-tnchlorophenol (4c) 	 	
2,4,6-trichlorophenol 	 	
STORET
34452
34586
34601
34616
34657
34591
34646
39032
77688
34621
CAS reg-
istry
59-50-7
96-57-8
120-83-2
51-28-5
534-52-1
88-75-5
100-02-7
87-86-5
93-37-55
95-95-4
88-06-2
EPA-
EGD
022 A
024 A
031 A
059 A
060 A
057 A
058 A
064 A
530 A
531 A
021 A
NPDES
008 A
001 A
002 A
005 A
004 A
006 A
007 A
009 A
011 A
       TABLE 3—GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY OF BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
EGD
No1
164
061
603
703
610
710
613
713
265
365
218
318
617
717
226
326
227
327
225
325
242
342
212
312
063
256
356
254
354
234
334
043
208
308
255
355
609
Compound
2,2'-difluorobiphenyl (int std) 	 	
N-nitrosodimethylamme 	 	
alpha picoline-d7 	 	 	
alpha picolme 	 	
styrene-d5 	 ... . ...
styrene 	 .... 	
p-cymene-d14
p-cymene .. 	 	
phenol-dS 	 	
phenol 	 	 	
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether-d8 	
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 	
n-decane-d22
n-decane 	 . ... 	
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene-d4 . 	 	
1 ,3-dfChlorobenzene 	 	
1,4-dichlorobenzene-d4 . 	 	
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene 	 ... ...
1 ,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 ....
1,2-dichlorobenzene 	 	
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether-d12
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether . . . . .
hexachloroethane-1 3C 	 	
hexachloroethane . . 	 .... . .
N-nitrosodi-n-propy(amine 	 .... 	
nitrobenzene-d5 . ... .
nitrobenzene 	 . , 	 	
isophorone-d8 	 	
isophorone 	 	 . . ..
2,4-dimethyl phenol-d3 	 	
2,4-dimethytphenol 	 . . . .
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane ... 	
1 ,2,4-tnchlorobenzene-d3 . . ..
1 ,2,4-tnchlorobenzene 	 .... . ...
naphthalene-dS . . .... ....
naphthalene 	
alpha-teipmeol-dS 	 	
Retention time
Mean
(sec)
1163
385
417
426
546
549
742
755
696
700
696
704
698
720
722
724
737
740
758
760
788
799
819
823
830
845
849
881
889
921
924
939
955
958
963
967
973
EGD
Ret
164
164
164
603
164
610
164
613
164
265
164
218
164
617
164
226
164
227
164
225
164
242
164
212
164
164
256
164
254
164
234
164
164
208
164
255
164
Relative
1 000-1 000
ns
0 326-0.393
1 006-1.028
0 450-0.488
1 002-1 .009
0.624-0.652
1 008-1 .023
0584-0.613
0995-1 010
0 584-0 607
1 007-1 016
0.585-0615
1 022-1 038
0.605-0.636
0 998-1 008
0 601-0 666
0 997-1 009
0 632-0 667
0 995-1 008
0 664-0 691
1 010-1 016
0690-0717
0 999-1 001
ns
0 706-0 727
1 002-1 007
0 747-0 767
0999-1 017
0 781-0 803
0 999-1 003
ns
0.813-0.830
1 000-1 005
0819-0836
1 001-1 006
0.629-0.844
Detec-
tion
limit*
(H9/L)
10
50
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
                                   307

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  TABLE 3—GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY OF BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS—Continued
EGD
No1
709
606
706
529
252
352
253
353
220
320
518
612
712
608
708
277
377
271
371
236
336
201
301
605
705
602
702
280
380
240
340
270
370
619
719
235
335
237
337
607
707
262
362
041
209
309
281
520
381
278
378
604
704
528
621
721
268
368
239
339
284
384
205
305
522
623
723
067
276
376
Compound
alpha-terpineot 	 	 	

n-dodecane 	 	

hexachlorobutadiene-13C4 	 	

hexachlorocyclopentadiene-13C4 	 	
2-chloronaphthalene-d7 	 	

Biphenyl-d10 	 	
Biphenyl 	 	
Diphenyl ether-d10



Dimethyl phthalate-d4 	 	


Acenaphthene-d10 	 	 	

Dibenzofuran-dS 	 	 	
Beta-naphthylamine-d7 	 	




Dtethyl phthalate-d4
Diethyl phthalate 	 	




1 2-diphenylhydrazine (3) 	 	




4-bromophenyl phenyl ether .... 	
Hexachlorobenzene-13C6 	 	






Dibenzothiophene 	 	


Di-n-butyl phthalate-d4 	 	
Fluoranthene-d10 	 .... 	
Pyrene-d10 	 	
Pyrene 	 	 	
Benzidine-d8 .... 	 	 	

n-tetracosane-d50 	 	
n-tetracosane 	 	

Chrvsene 	 	
Retention time
Mean
(sec)
975
953
981
1003
1005
1006
1147
1142
1185
1200
1203
1205
1195
1211
1216
1265
1247
1269
1273
1283
1300
1298
1304
1331
1335
1368
1371
1395
1401
1406
1409
1409
1414
1447
1469
1359
1344
1433
1439
1437
1439
1447
1464
1498
1521
1522
1578
1580
1583
1588
1592
1559
1564
1650
1655
1677
1719
1723
1813
1817
1844
1852
1854
1853
1889
1997
2025
2060
2081
2083
EGD
Ref
609
164
606
164
164
252
164
253
164
220
164
164
612
164
608
164
277
164
271
164
236
164
201
164
605
164
602
164
281
164
240
164
270
164
619
164
235
164
237
164
607
164
262
164
164
209
164
164
281
164
278
164
604
164
164
621
164
268
164
239
164
284
164
205
164
164
612
164
164
276
Relative
0998-1.008
0 730-0.908
0.986-1.051
ns
0.856-0 871
0 999-1 002
0.976-0 986
0 999-1 001
1 014-1.024
0 997-1 007
ns
1 016-1 027
1.001-1 006
1 036-1.047
0.997-1 009
1 080-1 095
1 000-1 004
1.083-1 102
0.998-1.005
1.090-1 112
1 001-1 005
1 107-1.125
0.999-1 009
1 134-1.155
0 998-1 007
1,163-1.189
0.996-1 007
1.185-1.214
0,999-1 008
1.194-1223
0 990-1 01 5
1.197-1 229
0996-1.006
1.010-1.478
1.013-1.020
1 152-1 181
1 000-1 002
1216-1.248
0999-1.009
1 213-1.249
1.000-1.007
1.225-1.252
1.000-1.002
1.271-1.307
1.288-1.327
0 999-1 001
1 334-1 380
ns
1 000-1.005
1 342-1 388
0 998-1 006
1.314-1.361
1.000-1 006
ns
1.184-1.662
1.010-1021
1 446-1 510
1.000-1.003
1.522-1.596
1.000-1.004
1.523-1 644
1.001-1 003
1.549-1 632
1 000-1002
ns
1 671-1.764
1. 012-1 01S
ns
1 .743-1 837
1 000-1 004
Detec-
tion
limit 2
(H9/L)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
20
20
20
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
                                    308

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth.  1625
    TABLE 3—GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY OF BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS—Continued
EGD
No1
272
372
228
328
266
366
524
269
369
525
274
354
275
375
273
373
626
726
083
082
279
379
Compound
Benzo(a)anthracene-d12 ... . . .
Benzo(a)anthracene . . . 	 .... . . ...
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine-d6 	 ...
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine 	 	 	 	
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-d4 	
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 	
di-n-octyl phthalate-d4 . . 	 	
n-octacosane 	 	


Benzo(k)fluoranthene 	
Benzo(a)pyrene-d12 	 	 	





Benzo(ohi)pervlene 	
Retention time
Mean
(sec)
2082
2090
2088
2086
2123
2124
2147
2239
2240
2272
2281
2293
2287
2293
2351
2350
2384
2429
2650
2660
2741
2750
EGD
Ref
164
272
164
228
164
266
164
164
269
164
164
274
164
275
164
273
164
626
164
164
164
279
Relative
1 735-1 846
0 999-1 007
1 744-1 848
1.000-1 001
1 771-1 880
1 000-1 002
ns
1.867-1 982
1.000-1.002
ns
1 902-2 025
1 .000-1 005
1 .906-2 033
1 000-1.005
1 954-2.088
1.000-1 004
1.972-2127
1.011-1 028
ns
ns
2.187-2524
1 001-1.006
Detec-
tion
limit2
(ug/L)
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
20
20
20
  1 Reference numbers beginning with 0, 1 or 5 indicate a pollutant quantified by the internal standard method; reference num-
bers beginning with 2 or 6 indicate a labeled compound quantified by the internal standard method, reference numbers beginning
with 3 or 7 indicate a pollutant quantified by isotope dilution
  2This is a minimum level at which the entire GC/MS system must give recognizable mass spectra (background corrected) and
acceptable calibration points
  3 Detected as azobenzene.
  4 Detected as diphenylamine.
  ns = specification not available at time of release of method.
  Column: 30 ±2 m x 0 25 ±0.02 mm i d. 94% methyl, 4% phenyl, 1% vinyl bonded phase fused silica capillary
  Temperature program. 5 min at 30 °C; 30 - 280 °C at 8 °C per mm, isothermal at 280 °C until benzo(ghi)perylene elutes.
  Gas vefocrty 30 ±5 cm/sec


                TABLE 4—GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY OF ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
EGD
No. i
164
224
324
257
357
231
331
222
322
221
321
531
530
259
359
258
358
260
360
264
364
Compound
2 2'-difluorobiphenyl (int std)

2-chlorophenol 	 .... 	 ....


2,4-dichlorophenol-d3 	 	
4-chloro-3-methylphenol-d2 	
2,4,6-trichlorophenol-d2 . 	
2,4 6-tnchlorophenol


2,4-dmitrophenol-d3 	 	 	

4-mtrophenol-d4 	 	

2-methyl-4,6-dmitrophenol 	 	 	
Pentachlorophenol-13C6 . . 	
Pentachlorophenol 	
Retention time
Mean
(sec)
1163
701
705
898
900
944
947
1086
1091
1162
1165
1170
1195
1323
1325
1349
1354
1433
1435
1559
1561
EGD
Ref
164
164
224
164
257
164
231
164
222
164
221
164
164
164
259
164
258
164
260
164
264
Relative
1 000-1 000
0.587-0.618
0997-1 010
0 761-0 783
0.994-1 009
0.802-0 822
0.997-1 006
0.930-0.943
0 998-1 003
0.994-1 005
0.998-1 004
ns
ns
1 127-1 149
1 .000-1 005
1.147-1 175
0.997-1 006
1.216-1.249
1 000-1 002
1 .320-1 363
0.998-1 002
Detec-
tion limit
2(ngA)
10
10
10
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
50
50
20
20
50
50
  ' Reference numbers beginning with 0, 1 or 5 indicate a pollutant quantified by the internal standard method, reference num-
bers beginning with 2 or 6 indicate a labeled compound quantified by the internal standard method, reference numbers beginning
with 3 or 7 indicate a pollutant quantified by isotope dilution.
  2 This is a minimum level at which the entire GC/MS system must give recognizable mass spectra (background corrected) and
acceptable calibration points.
  ns=specification not available at time of release of method
  Column 30 ±2mxO 25 ±0 02mm i d 94% methyl, 4% phenyl, 1% vinyl bonded phase fused silica capillary
  Temperature program: 5 min at 30 °C, 8 °C/mm to 250°C or until pentachlorophenol elutes
  Gas velocity 30± 5 cm/sec
                                                   309

-------
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1625
                                                   40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
      TABLE 5 — DFTPP MASS INTENSITY
              SPECIFICATIONS
                                        TABLE  6 — BASE/NEUTRAL  EXTRACTABLE COM-
                                         POUND CHARACTERISTIC MASSES — Continued
Mass
   51
   68
   70
  127
  197
  199
  275
  365
  441
  442
  443
                   Intensity required
30-60 percent of mass 198.
Less than 2 percent of mass 69
Less than 2 percent of mass 69
40-60 percent of mass 198
Less than 1 percent of mass 198.
5-9 percent of mass 198.
10-30 percent of mass 198.
greater than 1 percent of mass 198
present and less than mass 443
40-100 percent  of mass 198
17-23 percent of mass 442
    TABLE 6—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE
     COMPOUND CHARACTERISTIC MASSES
Compound


Anthracene 	
Benzidine 	
Benzo(a)anthracene 	

Benzo(a)pyrene 	
Benzo(ghi)perylene 	
Biphenyl 	 	
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 	
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 	
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether 	
Butyl benzyl phthalate 	
n-C10
n-C12 	
n-C14 .
n-C16 	
n-C18
n-C20 	
n-C22 ... . 	
n-C24
n-C26 	
n-C28 .
n-C30
Carbazole 	
2-chloronaphthalene 	
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether 	


Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 	
Dibenzofuran 	
Dibenzothiophene ... 	
Di-n-butyl phthalate 	
1 ,2-dichlorobenzene 	
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene — . ...
Labeled
analog
d10
d8
d10
d8
d12
d12
d12
d12
d12
d10
d8
d12
d4
d22
d26
d34

d42
d50


d62
d8
d7
d5
d12
d14
d8
d8
d4
d4
d4
Pnmary m/
z
154/164
152/160
178/188
184/192
228/240
252/264
252/264
252/264
276/288
154/164
93/101
93
121/131
149/153
248
149
55/66
55/66
55
55/66
55
55/66
55
55/66
55
55
55/66
167/175
162/169
204/209
228/240
114/130
278
168/176
184/192
149/153
146/152
146/152
Compound
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene ... 	
3,3'-dichlorobenzidme 	
Diethyl phthalate ....
2,4-dimethylphenol 	
Dimethyl phthalate .... 	
2,6-dinitrotoluene 	
Di-n-octyl phthalate 	
Diphenyl ether 	 	
1 ,2-dipnenylhydrazine 1 	
Fluoranthene .... 	
Hexachlorobenzene 	
Hexachlorobutadiene 	
Hexachloroethane 	
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 	



B-naphthylamme 	
N-nitrosodimethylamme 	

Phenanthrene 	
a-picolme 	
Pyrene 	
Styrene . 	
a-terpineol 	
1 2,3-tnchlorobenzene 	
1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene 	
Labeled
analog
d4
d6
d4
d3
d4
d3
d3
d4
d10
d10
d10
d10
d10
13C6
13C4
13C
13C4

d8
d8
d7
d5

d6
d10
d5
d7
d10
as
d3
d3
d3
Primary ml
z
146/152
252/258
149/153
122/125
163/167
164/168
165/167
149/153
169/179
170/180
77/82
202/212
166/176
284/292
225/231
201/204
237/241
276
82/88
128/136
143/150
123/128
74
70
169/175
178/188
94/71
93/100
202/212
104/109
59/62
180/183
180/183
                                                1 Detected as azobenzene.
                                                2 Detected as diphenylamme.

                                                 TABLE 77—ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUND
                                                        CHARACTERISTIC MASSES
Compound
4-chloro-3-methylphenol .

2,4-diniUoprtenol 	
2-methyl-4,6-dmitrophenol 	
2-nitrophenot 	



2,4,5-trichlorophenol 	
2 4 6-trichlorophenol

Labeled
analog
d2
d4
d3
d3
d2
d4
d4
13C6
d2
d2
d2

Pnmary m/
z
107/109
128/132
162/167
184/187
198/200
139/143
139/143
266/272
196/200
196/200
196/200

                  TABLE 8—ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
EGD
No'
301
201
377
277
Compound

Acenaphthene-d10 	

Acenaohthvlene-dB 	
Acceptance criteria
Initial precision and ac-
curacy section 8 2.3
(H9/L)
s
21
38
38
31
X
79-134
38-147
69-186
38-146
Labeled com-
pound recov-
ery sec 8,3
and 14.2 P
(percent)

20-270
23-239
Calibration
verification
sec. 125
(ug/mL)
80-125
71-141
60-166
66-152
On-going
accuracy
sec. 11.6R
(lig/L)
72-144
30-180
61-207
33-168
                                           310

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
          TABLE 8—ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
EGD
No '
378
278
305
205
372
272
374
274
375
275
373
273
379
279
712
612
318
218
043
342
242
366
266
041
067
717
617
706
606
518
719
619
520
721
621
522
723
623
524
525
726
626
528
320
220
322
222
324
224
340
240
376
276
713
613
082
705
605
704
604
368
268
325
225
326
226
327
Compound
Anthracene
Anthracene-d1Q 	
Benzidine ....
Benzidine-d8
Benzo(a)anthracene 	
Benzo(a)anthracene-d12 ... .
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene-d1 2 	
Benzojkjfluoranthene 	 . .
Benzo(k)fluoranthene-d12 ... . .
Benzo(a)pyrene 	
Benzo(a)pyrene-d12 	
Benzo(ghi)perylene 	
Benzo(ghi)perylene-d12 	
Biphenyl (Appendix C) . .
Biphenyl-d12 .... 	
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 	
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether-d8 	
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane"
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether . .. .
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether-d 12
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 	
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate-d4
4-bromophenyl pnenyl ether*
Butyl benzyl phthalate*
n-C10 (Appendix C) 	
n-C10-d22
n-Cl 2 (Appendix C) ... 	
n-C12-d26
n-C14 (Appendix C)* 	
n-C16 (Appendix C) . .
n-C16-d34
n-C18 (Appendix C)* ....
n-C20 (Appendix C) . ...
n-C20-d42
n-C22 (Appendix C)' . ..
n-C24 (Appendix C) . .
n-C24-d50
n-C26 (Appendix C)"
n-C28 (Appendix C)*
n-C30 (Appendix C)
n-C30-d62 ....
Carbazole (4c)' 	
2-chloronaphthalene . ...
2-chloronaphthalene-d7
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
4-chloro-3-methylphenol-d2
2-chlorophenol
2-chlorophenol-d4 . .
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether-d5
Chrysene . 	 	
Chrysene-d12 	
p-cymene (Appendix C) . . ...
p-cymene-d14 ... ...
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene*
Dibenzofuran (Appendix C)
Dibenzofuran-d8
Dibenzothiophene (Synfuel) . . ..
Dibenzothiophene-d8
Di-n-butyl phthalate 	
Di-n-butyl phthalate-d4
1 ,2-dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 	
1 ,3-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene-d4
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene
Acceptance criteria
Initial precision and ac-
curacy section 8.2 3
(M9/L)
s
41
49
119
269
20
41
183
168
26
114
26
24
21
45
41
43
34
33
27
17
27
31
29
44
31
51
70
74
53
109
33
46
39
59
34
31
11
28
35
35
32
41
38
100
41
37
111
13
24
42
52
51
69
18
67
55
20
31
31
31
15
23
17
35
43
48
42
X
58-174
31-194
16-518
ns-ns
65-168
25-298
32-545
11-577
59-143
15-514
62-195
35-181
72-160
29-268
75-148
28-165
55-196
29-196
43-153
81-138
35-149
69-220
32-205
44-140
19-233
24-195
ns-298
35-369
ns-331
ns-985
80-162
37-162
42-131
53-263
34-172
45-152
80-139
27-21 1
35-193
35-193
61-200
27-242
36-165
46-357
30-168
76-131
30-174
79-135
36-162
75-166
40-161
59-186
33-219
76-140
ns-359
23-299
85-136
47-136
79-150
48-130
76-165
23-195
73-146
14-212
63-201
13-203
61-194
Labeled com-
pound recov-
ery sec 8 3
and 142 P
(percent)

14-419

ns-ns

12-605

ns-ns

ns-ns

21-290

14-529

ns-ns

15-372


20-260

18-364



ns-ns

ns-ns


18-308


19-306


15-376



13-479


15-324

ns-613

23-255

19-325

13-512

ns-ns


28-220

29-215

13-346

ns-494

ns-550

Calibration
verification
sec 125
(|ig/mL)
60-168
58-171
34-296
ns-ns
70-142
28-357
61-164
14-ns
13-ns
13-ns
78-129
12-ns
69-145
13-ns
58-171
52-192
61-164
52-194
44-228
67-148
44-229
76-131
43-232
52-193
22-450
42-235
44-227
60-166
41-242
37-268
72-138
54-186
40-249
54-184
62-162
40-249
65-154
50-199
26-392
26-392
66-152
24-423
44-227
58-171
72-139
85-115
68-147
78-129
55-180
71-142
57-175
70-142
24-^111
79-127
66-152
13-761
73-136
66-150
72-140
69-145
71-142
52-192
74-135
61-164
65-154
52-192
62-161
On-going
accuracy
sec 1 1 6 R
(ng/L)
50-199
23-242
11-672
ns-ns
62-176
22-329
20-ns
ns-ns
53-155
ns-685
59-206
32-194
58-168
25-303
62-176
17-267
50-213
25-222
39-166
77-145
30-169
64-232
28-224
35-172
35-170
19-237
ns-504
29-424
ns-408
ns-ns
71-181
28-202
35-167
46-301
29-198
39-195
78-142
25-229
31-212
31-212
56-215
23-274
31-188
35-442
24-204
62-159
14-314
76-138
33-176
63-194
29-212
48-221
23-290
72-147
ns^l68
19-340
79-146
39-160
70-168
40-156
74-169
22-209
70-152
11-247
55-225
ns-260
53-219
                                   311
     203-160  D-11

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
          TABLE 8—ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
EGD
No'
227
328
228
331
231
370
270
334
234
371
271
359
259
335
235
336
236
369
269
707
607
708
608
337
237
339
239
380
280
309
209
352
252
312
212
353
253
083
354
254
360
260
355
255
702
602
356
256
357
257
358
258
061
063
362
232
364
264
381
281
365
265
703
603
384
284
710
Compound
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene-d4
3,3'-dichlorobenzidme
3,3'-dichlorobenzidme-d6 	
2,4-dichlorophenol 	
2,4-dichlorophenol-d3 . ...
Diethyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate-d4 . ...
2,4-dimethytphenol 	
2,4-dimethylphenol-d3 .
Dimethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate-d4 . . 	
2,4-dmitrophenol-d3 	 ...
2,4-dmitrototuene . ... ...
2,4-dmitrotoluene-d3
2,6-dmitrotoluene 	 	

Di-n-octyl phthalate-d4 	
Diphenylamme (Appendix C) 	
Diphenyl ether (Appendix C) 	
Diphenyl ether-d10 	 	
1 ,2-diphenylhydrazme 	 ....
1,2-diphenylhydrazine-d10 . 	
Fluoranthene 	 	
Fluoranthene-d10 	 . . ..
Fluorene 	 	
Hexachlorobenzene 	
Hexachlorobenzene-13C6 	
hexachlorobutadiene 	
hexachlorobutadiene-1 3C4
hexachloroethane 	 	
hexachloroethane-13C1 	
hexachlorocyclopentadiene 	
hexachlorocyclopentadiene-13C4 ..
ideno(1 ,2,3-cd)pyrene* 	
isophorone-d8 	 	
2-methyl-4,6-dmitrophenol 	
2-methyl-4,6-dmitrophenol-d2 . . ....

B-naphthylamine (Appendix C)
B-naphthylamine-d7 	 	
nitrobenzene . . 	
2-nitrophenol . 	
2-mtrophenol-d4 	 	
4-nitrophenol-d4 	
N-mtrosodimethylamile" .. 	
N-ratrosodiphenylamme 	
pentachlorophenol 	
pentachlorophenol-13C6 	
phenanthrene 	


a-picolme (Synfuel) 	
a-picolme-d7 	 	
pyrene-d10 	 	
stvrene (Aooendix C) 	 . 	
Acceptance criteria
Initial precision and ac-
curacy section 823
(ng/L)
s
48
26
80
12
28
44
78
13
22
36
108
18
66
18
37
30
59
16
46
45
42
19
37
73
35
33
35
29
43
16
81
56
63
227
77
15
60
55
25
23
19
64
20
39
49
33
25
28
15
23
42
188
198
198
45
37
21
49
13
40
36
161
38
138
19
29
42
X
15-193
68-174
ns-562
85-131
38-164
75-196
ns-260
62-153
15-228
74-188
ns-640
72-134
22-308
75-158
22-245
80-141
44-184
77-161
12-383
58-205
27-206
82-136
36-155
49-308
31-173
71-177
36-161
81-132
51-131
90-124
36-228
51-251
ns-316
21-ns
ns-400
69-144
ns-ns
23-299
76-156
49-133
77-133
36-247
80-139
28-157
10-ns
ns-ns
69-161
18-265
78-140
41-145
62-146
14-398
21-472
21^172
65-142
54-126
76-140
37-212
93-119
45-130
77-127
21-210
59-149
11-380
76-152
32-176
53-221
Labeled com-
pound recov-
ery sec 8 3
and 142 P
(percent)
ns-474
ns-ns
24-260
ns-ns
ns-449
ns-ns
ns-ns
10-514
17-^t42
ns-ns
11-^88
19-281
17-316
20-278
27-238
13-595
ns-ns
ns-ns
ns-ns
33-193
16-527
14-305
ns-ns
ns-ns
27-217
ns-ns
26-256
18-412
24-241
ns-ns
ns-ns
18-303
Calibration
verification
sec 12.5
(ug/mL)
65-153
77-130
18-558
67-149
64-157
74-135
47-21 1
67-150
58-172
73-137
50-201
75-133
39-256
79-127
53-187
55-183
36-278
71-140
21-467
57-176
59-169
83-120
77-129
75-134
58-174
67-149
47-215
74-135
61-164
78-128
38-265
74-135
68-148
71-141
47-212
77-129
47-21 1
13-761
70-142
52-194
69-145
56-177
73-137
71-141
39-256
44-230
85-115
46-219
77-129
61-163
55-183
35-287
40-249
40-249
68-148
59-170
77-130
42-237
75-133
67-149
65-155
48-208
60-165
31-324
76-132
48-210
65-153
On-going
accuracy
sec 1 1 6 R
(ug/L)
11-245
64-185
ns-ns
83-135
34-182
65-222
ns-ns
60-156
14-242
67-207
ns-ns
68-141
17-378
72-164
19-275
70-159
31-250
74-166
10-433
51-231
21-249
77-144
29-186
40-360
26-200
64-194
30-187
70-151
38-172
85-132
23-321
43-287
ns-413
13-ns
ns-563
67-148
ns-ns
19-340
70-168
44-147
72-142
28-307
75-149
22-192
ns-ns
ns-ns
65-169
15-314
75-145
37-158
51-175
ns-ns
12-807
12-807
53-173
40-166
71-150
29-254
87-126
34-168
62-154
ns-ns
50-174
ns-608
72-159
28-196
48-244
                                    312

-------
Environmental Protection Agency                        Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625

              TABLE 8—ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued

EGD
No1
610
709
609
529
308
208
530
531
321
221

Compound
styrene-d5 .. . . 	
a-terpmeol (Appendix C) 	
a-terpmeol-d3 	 	

1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene 	
1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene'd3 	
2,3,6-tnchlorophenol (4c)* . 	
2,4,5-tnchlorophenol (4c)" 	
2,4,6-trichlorophenol 	 	
2,4,6-tnchk>rophenol-d2 	
Acceptance criteria
Initial precision and ac-
curacy section 823
s
49
44
48
69
19
57
30
30
57
47
X
ns-281
42-234
22-292
15-229
82-136
15-212
58-137
58-137
59-205
43-183
Labeled com-
pound recov-
ery sec 8 3
and 142 P
(percent)
ns-ns

ns-672


ns-592



21-363
Calibration
verification
sec. 125
(|ig/mL)
44-228
54-186
20-502
60-167
78-128
61-163
56-180
56-180
81-123
69-144
On-going
accuracy
sec. 1 1 .6 R
(MI/L)
ns-348
38-258
18-339
11-297
77-144
10-282
51-153
51-153
48-244
34-226
  1 Reference numbers beginning with 0, 1 or 5 indicate a pollutant quantified by the internal standard method, reference num-
bers beginning with 2 or 6 indicate a labeled compound quantified by the internal standard method, reference numbers beginning
with 3 or 7 indicate a pollutant quantified by isotope dilution
  " Measured by internal standard; specification derived from related compound
  ns=no specification; limit is outside the range that can be measured reliably
                                                313

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth.  1625
       40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
           2          10   20    60   100  200
                CONCENTRATION (us/ml.)
                                                                               AREA =48300
 FIGURE 1  Relative Response Calibration Curve
 for  Phenol. The Dotted Lines  Enclose a  ± 10
 Percent Error Window.
FIGURE 3  Extracted Ion Current Profiles for (3A)
Unlabeled Compound,  (3B) Labeled Compound,
and (3C) Equal Mixture  of Unlabeled and Labeled
Compounds.
 FIGURE  2  Extracted  Ion Current Profiles for
 Chromatographically Resolved Labeled (nVz) and
 Unlabeled (m,/z) Pairs.
                                               314

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt.  136, App. A, Meth. 1625
                              STANDARD
                                                 BLANK
                                                                 SAMPLE
          [10.1.1]
          (10.1.21
          110.1.3)
          [10.1.4]
           HO-2)
            [10.S]
          [10.4.21
        (10.4,10.5]
            [11.3]
            111.4)
s
OHG/

1 L REAGENT
WATER

1
1 L REAGENT
WATER
1 L ALIQUOT
X X
SPIKE 500 pL
OF 200 pg/mL
ISOTOPES

1

SPIKE 1.0 mL
OF STANDARDS

i

STIR AND
EQUILIBRATE
SPIKE 500 pL
OF 200 pg/mL
ISOTOPES
^
SPIKE 500 pL
OF 200 pg/mL
ISOTOPES
f \
STIR AND
EQUILIBRATE
FANDARD OR BLANK
EXTRACT BASE/
NEUTRAL
INIC

CONCENTRATE
TO 2-4 mi.
L


1



•ir

AQUEOUS
J,
EXTRACT ACID
1
CONCENTRATE
TO 2-4 mL
1

CONCENTRATE
TOLOmL
1
ADD INTERNAL
STANDARD

1

INJECT

one

STIR AND
EQUILIBRATE
1
EXTRACT BASE/
NEUTRAL

lANIC AQUEOUS
t
CONCENTRATE
TO 1.0 mL
*
EXTRACT ACID


CONCENTRATE
TOLOmL
1 1
ADD INTERNAL
STANDARD
ADD INTERNAL
STANDARD
X X
INJECT
INJECT
       FIGURE 4  Flow Chart for Extraction/Concentration of Precision and Recovery Standard, Blank,
       and Sample by  Method 1625. Numbers in Brackets [ ] Refer to Section Numbers in the Method
                                           315

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth.  1625
                                             40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
8  45,000




^  35,000

CC

*

£  25,000
                                                        1    1    1
                                          ANTHRACENE-D,0
                               ^    I    I    1    I    I    I    I    I
                            123456789   10
                                         ANALYSIS NUMBER
z
w o
tt
tr*
UJ Q]





nan -
i i i i i i i i i
ANTHRACENE
• ' " t . •"
r * • *






                           6/1  Gil  6/1  6/1  6/2  6/2  6/3   6/3  6/4  6/5
                                          DATE ANALYZED
                 FIGURE 5  Quality Control Charts Showing Area (top graph) and
                 Relative Response of Anthracene to Anthracene-d,0 (lower graph)
                 Plotted as a Function of Time or Analysis Number.
                    OATfi: WNIDUSe II
                    CM.!: ABNlQllSe II
               RIC
               93/13/84  5:24:88
               SUTFLE: Be.C.ltR.WIW.Se C.Mirn.Wl
               CONOS.: 162» 3»1,6.iSll1.5«38 »-28«e, 15«288,39Cfl,SS
               RfWCE: G  1,3288 UttEl: N 2, 3.8 QUW: A 2, 2.8 J  8 BASE: U 28.  3
                                                         SCBN5   I TO 3286
                                             -f
                                             OM
                                             23:43
               FIGURE  6  Chromatogram  of  Combined  Acid/base/neutral Standard.
                                               316

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
            Pi. 136, App. A, Meth.  1625
       ATTACHMENT 1 TO METHOD 1625

               INTRODUCTION

  To   support  measurement   of  several
semivolatile pollutants, EPA has  developed
this attachment to EPA Method 1625B.1 The
modifications  listed in this attachment are
approved only for monitoring wastestreams
from the Centralized Waste Treatment Point
Source Category (40 CPB Part 437)  and the
Landfills  Point  Source  Category  (40  CFR
Part 445). EPA  Method 1625B (the Method)
employs  sample extraction  with methylene
chloride followed by analysis of the extract
using capillary column gas chromatography-
mass  spectrometry (GC/MS). This  attach-
ment   addresses   the   addition    of   the
semivolatile pollutants listed in Tables 1 and
2 to all applicable standard, stock, and spik-
ing solutions  utilized for  the determination
of semivolatile organic compounds  by EPA
Method 1625B.
    1.0
        EPA METHOD 1625 REVISION B
        MODIFICATION SUMMARY
  The additional semivolatile organic com-
pounds listed in Tables 1 and 2 are added to
all applicable calibration, spiking, and other
solutions  utilized in the determination of
semivolatile  compounds  by  EPA  Method
1625. The instrument is to be calibrated with
these compounds, and all  procedures  and
quality control tests described in the Method
must be performed.

      2.0  SECTION MODIFICATIONS

  NOTE: All section  and figure numbers in
this Attachment reference section and figure
numbers in EPA Method 1625 Revision B un-
less noted otherwise. Sections not listed here
remain unchanged.
Section 6.7 The stock standard solutions de-
   scribed in this section are modified such
   that the analytes in Tables 1 and 2 of this
   attachment are required in  addition to
   those specified in the Method.
Section 6.8  The labeled compound spiking
   solution in this section is modified to in-
   clude the labeled compounds listed in Ta-
   bles 5 and 6 of this attachment.
Section 6.9 The secondary standard is modi-
   fied to include the additional  analytes
  JEPA   Method    1625    Revision    B,
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Isotope
Dilution GC/MS, 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix
A.
   listed  in Tables 1 and 2 of this attach-
   ment.
Section 6.12 The solutions for obtaining au-
   thentic mass spectra are to include all
   additional analytes listed in Tables 1 and
   2 of this attachment.
Section 6.13  The  calibration  solutions  are
   modified to include the analytes listed in
   Tables 1 and 2 and the labeled compounds
   listed  in Tables 5 and 6 of this attach-
   ment.
Section 6.14  The precision and  recovery
   standard  is  modified  to  include  the
   analytes listed in Tables 1 and 2 and the
   labeled compounds listed in Tables 5 and
   6 of this attachment.
Section 6.15  The  solutions containing  the
   additional analytes listed in Tables 1 and
   2 of this attachment are to be  analyzed
   for stability.
Section 7.2.1  This section is modified to in-
   clude the analytes listed in Tables 1 and
   2 and the labeled compounds listed in Ta-
   bles 5 and 6 of this attachment.
Section 7.4.5  This section is modified to in-
   clude the analytes listed in Tables 1 and
   2 and the labeled compounds listed in Ta-
   bles 5 and 6 in the calibration.
Section 8.2 The initial precision and recov-
   ery (IPR) requirements are modified to
   include the analytes listed in  Tables 1
   and 2 and the labeled compounds listed in
   Tables 5 and 6 of this attachment.  Addi-
   tional  IPR performance criteria are sup-
   plied in Table 7 of this attachment.
Section 8.3 The labeled compounds listed in
   Tables 3 and 4 of this attachment are to
   be  included in the method performance
   tests.  Additional  method  performance
   criteria are supplied in Table 7 of this at-
   tachment.
Section 8.5.2  The acceptance criteria  for
   blanks includes the analytes listed in Ta-
   bles 1 and 2 of this attachment.
Section 10.1.2  The labeled compound solu-
   tion must include the labeled compounds
   listed in Tables 5 and 6 of this attach-
   ment
Section 10.1.3  The precision  and  recovery
   standard must include the analytes list-
   ed in Tables 1 and 2 and the labeled com-
   pounds listed in Tables 5 and 6 of this at-
   tachment.
Section 12.5 Additional QC requirements for
   calibration verification are  supplied in
   Table 7 of this attachment.
Section 12.7  Additional QC requirements for
   ongoing precision and recovery are sup-
   plied in Table 7 of this attachment.
                                         317

-------
Pt. 136, App. A, Meth. 1625                               40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)

                        TABLE 1—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
Compound
acetophenone ' . . 	 . 	 .....
aniline2 . 	 	 . . . ...
-2,3-dichloroanilme1 .... .... ...
-o-cresol' 	 . .. . . 	 .... 	
pyndme2 .... 	 	 	 	
Pollutant
CAS
Registry
98-86-2
62-53-3
608-27-5
95-48-7
110-86-1
EPA-EGD
758
757
578
771
1330
  CAS = Chemical Abstracts Registry.
  EGO = Effluent Guidelines Division.
  1 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment industry
  2 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries.


                             TABLE 2—ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
Compound
p-cresol i . . . 	 ... ... .... 	
Pollutant
CAS
Registry
106-44-5
EPA-EGD
1744
  CAS = Chemical Abstracts Registry
  EGD = Effluent Guidelines Division
  ' Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries


         TABLE 3—GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY '  OF BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS

EGD No
758 	
757 	
578 	
771 	
1330 	

Compound
acetophenone4 	
aniline5 	 	
2,3-dichloroaniline" 	
o-cresol4 .... 	
pyridme5 	
Retention time 2
Mean
(sec)
818
694
1160
814
378
EGD Ref
658
657
164
671
1230
Relative
1 .003-1 005
0.994-1 023
1.003-1007
1 005-1 009
1 005-1.011
Minimum
level-'
(ng/L)
10
10
10
10
10
  EGO = Effluent Guidelines Division
  i The data presented in this table were obtained under the chromatographic conditions given in the footnote to Table 3 of EPA
Method 1625B.
  2 Retention times are approximate and are intended to be consistent with the retention times for the analytes in EPA Method
1625B
  3 See the definition in footnote 2 to Table 3 of EPA Method 1625B
  4 Analysis of this pollutant ts approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment industry.
  5 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries


              TABLE 4—GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ' OF ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
EGD No
1744 	
Compound
p-cresol 4
Retention time 2
Mean
(sec)
834
EGD Ref
1644
Relative
1 004-1 008
Minimum
level
(M/U3
20
  EGD = Effluent Guidelines Division
  1 The data presented in this table were obtained under the chromatographic conditions given in the footnote to Table 4 of EPA
Method 1625B
  2 Retention times are approximate and are intended to be consistent with the retention times  for the analytes in EPA Method
1625B
  ^See the definition in footnote 2 to Table 4 of EPA Method 1625B
  4 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries


             TABLE 5—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLE COMPOUND CHARACTERISTIC M/Z'S
Compound
acetophenone3 	 . 	 . ...
anifme1 , . . . ...
o-cresol2 . . ....
2,3-dtchloroanilme 2 . . 	
ovridine3 ... 	 	
Labeled Ana-
log
d,
d,
d,
n/a
d,
Primary
m/z1
105/110
93/100
108/116
161
79/84
  m/z = mass to charge ratio.
                                                 318

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           Pt. 136, App. B
  1 Native/labeled
  2 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment industry
  'Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries

                TABLE 6—ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUND CHARACTERISTIC M/Z'S
Compound
p-cresol2 	 ....
Labeled Ana-
log
d,
Primary
m/z'
108/116
  m/z = mass to charge ratio
  ' Native/labeled
  2 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills industries

                  TABLE 7—ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
EGDNo
758 	
658 ..
757
657 , .. .
771 	
671 	
1744
1644 	
578
1330 ... .
1230 	
Compound
acetophenone ' ...
acetophenone-d,1 ...
aniline2 . ....
aniline-d72 	
o-cresol1 	
o-cresol-d7' 	
p-cresol2 ... 	
p-cresol-d72
pyrtdme 2 	
pyridme-d , 2
Acceptance criteria
Initial precision and accu-
racy section 8 2
(ug/L)
(lil'L)
34
51
32
71
40
23
59
22
13
28
ns
X
44-167
23-254
30-171
15-278
31-226
30-146
54-140
11-«18
40-160
10-421
7-392
Labeled
compound
recovery
sec 8.3 and
142P
(percent)
45-162
33-154
35-196
37-203
19-238
Calibration
verification
sec 125
ng/VnL)
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
85-115
83-117
85-115
On-going
accuracy
sec 12 7 H
(eg"-)
45-162
22-264
33-154
12-344
35-196
31-142
37-203
16-415
44-144
18-238
4-621
  s = Standard deviation of four recovery measurements
  X = Average recovery for four recovery measurements
  EGO = Effluent Guidelines Division
  ns = no specification, limit is outside the range that can be measured reliably
  1 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment industry
  2 Analysis of this pollutant is approved only for the Centralized Waste Treatment and Landfills mdustnes

[49 FR 43261, Oct. 26, 1984; 50 FR 692, 695, Jan. 4, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 23702, June 30, 1986;
62 FR 48405, Sept. 15, 1997; 65 FR 3044, Jan. 19, 2000; 65 FR 81295, 81298, Dec. 22, 2000]
APPENDIX B TO PART  136—DEFINITION
    AND   PROCEDURE  FOB  THE  DETER-
    MINATION  OF  THE  METHOD  DETEC-
    TION LIMIT—REVISION 1.11

                 Definition
  The method detection limit (MDL) is de-
fined as  the minimum  concentration  of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with  99%  confidence  that the analyte  con-
centration is greater than zero and is deter-
mined from  analysis of a sample in a given
matrix containing the analyte.

            Scope and Application
  This procedure is designed for applicability
to a  wide variety of sample  types ranging
from   reagent   (blank)   water  containing
analyte to wastewater containing  analyte.
The  MDL for an analytical procedure  may
vary as a  function of sample type. The proce-
dure  requires a complete,  specific, and  well
defined analytical method.  It is essential
that all sample processing steps of the  ana-
lytical method be included in the determina-
tion of the method detection limit.
  The  MDL obtained by this procedure  is
used to  judge the significance of a  single
measurement of a future sample.
  The MDL procedure was designed for appli-
cability  to a broad variety of physical and
chemical methods. To accomplish this, the
procedure  was made device- or instrument-
independent.

                 Procedure

  1. Make an estimate of the detection limit
using one of the following::
  (a)  The  concentration  value  that  cor-
responds to an instrument signal/noise in the
range of 2.5 to 5.
  (b) The concentration equivalent of  three
times the standard deviation of replicate in-
strumental measurements  of the analyte  in
reagent water.
  (c) That region of the standard curve where
there is  a significant change  in sensitivity,
i.e.,  a  break  in the slope of  the standard
curve.
                                           319

-------
Pt. 136, App. B
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (d) Instrumental limitations.
  It is recognized that the experience of the
analyst  is important to this process. How-
ever,  the analyst must include the above
considerations in the initial estimate of the
detection limit.
  2. Prepare reagent (blank) water that is as
free of analyte as possible. Reagent or inter-
ference free  water is defined as  a water sam-
ple in which analyte and iuterferent  con-
centrations  are not  detected at the method
detection limit of each analyte of interest.
Interferences are defined as systematic er-
rors in the measured analytical signal of  an
established procedure caused by the presence
of  interfering   species  (interferent).  The
interferent concentration is presupposed  to
be normally distributed in representative
samples of a given matrix.
  3. (a) If the MDL is to be determined in re-
agent (blank) water, prepare  a laboratory
standard (analyte in reagent water) at a con-
centration which is at  least equal to or  in
the same concentration range  as  the  esti-
mated method detection limit.  (Recommend
between 1 and 5 times the estimated method
detection limit.) Proceed to Step 4.
  (b) If the MDL is to be determined in an-
other sample matrix, analyze the sample. If
the measured level of the analyte  is in the
recommended range  of one to five times the
estimated detection limit, proceed to Step 4.
  If the  measured level of analyte is less
than  the estimated detection  limit, add a
known amount of analyte to bring the level
of analyte between one and five times the es-
timated detection limit.
  If the measured level  of analyte is greater
than  five  times  the  estimated  detection
limit, there are two options.
  (1)  Obtain another sample with a  lower
level  of analyte in the same matrix if pos-
sible.
  (2) The sample may be used as is for deter-
mining  the  method  detection  limit if the
analyte level does not  exceed  10 times the
MDL  of  the analyte in reagent water. The
variance of the analytical method changes as
the analyte concentration increases from the
MDL,  hence the MDL  determined under
these circumstances may not  truly reflect
method variance at lower analyte concentra-
tions.
  4. (a) Take a minimum of seven aliquots of
the sample to be used to calculate the meth-
od detection limit and process each through
the entire analytical method. Make all com-
putations according  to the defined method
with final  results in the  method reporting
units. If a blank measurement is required to
calculate the measured level of analyte, ob-
tain a separate blank measurement for each
sample aliquot analyzed. The average blank
measurement is subtracted from the respec-
tive sample measurements.
  (b) It may be economically and technically
desirable to evaluate the  estimated method
detection limit before  proceeding with 4a.
This will: (1) Prevent repeating this entire
procedure when the  costs  of  analyses  are
high and (2) insure that the  procedure is
being conducted  at  the correct  concentra-
tion. It  is quite possible  that an inflated
MDL will be calculated from  data obtained
at many times the real MDL even though the
level of analyte is less than five times the
calculated method detection limit. To insure
that the estimate of the  method detection
limit is a good estimate,  it is necessary to
determine  that a  lower  concentration  of
analyte will  not result in a  significantly
lower  method  detection  limit.  Take  two
aliquots of the sample to be used to calculate
the method detection limit and process each
through the entire method, including blank
measurements  as described  above  in  4a.
Evaluate these  data:
  (1) If  these  measurements  indicate  the
sample is in  desirable range for  determina-
tion of  the  MDL,  take  five  additional
aliquots and proceed. Use all seven measure-
ments for calculation of the MDL.
  (2) If  these  measurements  indicate  the
sample is not  in correct  range,  reestimate
the MDL, obtain new sample as in 3 and re-
peat either 4a or 4b.
  5. Calculate the variance (S2) and standard
deviation (S) of the replicate measurements,
as follows:
                                     n-l
                                   S= S'
where:
                                             Xt; i=l to n, are the analytical results in the
                                              final method reporting units obtained from
                                         320

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                          PI.  136, App. B
  the n sample aliquots and I refers to the
  sum of the X values from i=l to n.
  6. (a) Compute the MDL as follows:
where:
MDL = the method detection limit
t(n-i.i-a,99) = the students' t value appropriate
  for a 99% confidence level and a standard
  deviation estimate with n-1 degrees of free-
  dom. See Table.
S = standard deviation of the replicate anal-
  yses.
  (b) The  95% confidence interval estimates
for the MDL derived in 6a are computed ac-
cording to the following equations derived
from percentiles  of the  chi square over de-
grees of freedom distribution (z2/df).
LCL = 0.64 MDL
UCL = 2.20 MDL
where: LCL and UCL are the lower and upper
  95% confidence limits  respectively based
  on seven aliquots.
  7.  Optional  iterative procedure to verify
the  reasonableness of the estimate  of  the
MDL and subsequent MDL determinations.
  (a) If this is the initial attempt to compute
MDL based on the estimate of MDL  formu-
lated in Step 1, take the MDL as calculated
in Step 6, spike the matrix at this calculated
MDL and  proceed through  the  procedure
starting with Step 4.
  (b) If this is the second or later iteration of
the MDL calculation,  use S2  from the cur-
rent MDL calculation  and S2 from the pre-
vious MDL  calculation to compute  the  F-
ratio.  The  F-ratio  is calculated by  sub-
stituting the  larger S2 into  the numerator
S2A and the  other into the denominator S2B.
The  computed F-ratio is then compared with
the F-ratio found in the table which is 3.05 as
follows: if S2A/S2B<3.05,  then compute  the
pooled standard deviation by the following
equation:
                                'pooled
                                                   2 12
                                              12
  if S2A/S2B>3.05, respike at the most recent
   calculated MDL and process the samples
   through the procedure starting with Step
   4. If the most recent calculated MDL
   does not permit  qualitative  identifica-
   tion  when samples are spiked at  that
   level, report  the MDL as a concentration
   between the current and previous MDL
   which permits qualitative identification.
  (c) Use the Spooled  as calculated in 7b  to
compute The final MDL according to the fol-
lowing equation:

             MDL=2.681 (Spoow)
where 2.681 is equal to t,i2.i-c»=99).
  (d) The 95% confidence limits for MDL de-
rived in 7c are  computed according  to the
following equations derived from  precentiles
of the chi  squared over degrees  of freedom
distribution.
  LCL=0.72 MDL
  UCL=1.65 MDL
where LCL and UCL are the lower and upper
95%  confidence limits respectively based on
14 aliquots.

  TABLES OF STUDENTS' T VALUES AT THE 99
         PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL
  TABLES OF STUDENTS' T VALUES AT THE 99
   PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL—Continued
Number of replicates
7 ....
Degrees
of free-
dom (n-1)
6
tcn.|.»)
3143
Number of replicates
8
g
10 	
11 	
16 	
21 	 	
26 	
31 ... 	
61 	
00

Degrees
of free-
dom (n-1)
7
8
9
10
15
20
25
30
60
00

ten- 1.9*»)
2998
2896
2821
2.764
2602
2.528
2485
2.457
2390
2326

                 Reporting

  The analytical  method used must be spe-
cifically identified by number or title aid the
MDL for each analyte expressed in the ap-
propriate method reporting units. If the ana-
lytical method permits options which affect
the method detection limit, these conditions
must be specified with the MDL  value. The
sample matrix used to determine the MDL
must also be identified with MDL value. Re-
port the  mean analyte level with the MDL
and  indicate  if  the  MDL procedure  was
iterated.  If a laboratory standard or a sam-
ple that contained a known amount analyte
was used for this determination, also report
the mean recovery.
                                         321

-------
Pt. 136, App. C
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  If the level of analyte in the sample was
below  ttte  determined  MDL or exceeds  10
times  the  MDL of the analyte in reagent
water, do not report a value for the MDL.
[49 FR 43430, Oct. 26, 1984; 50 FB 694, 696, Jan.
4, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 23703, June 30,
1986]

APPENDIX C TO PART 136—INDUCTIVELY
    COUPLED PLASMA—ATOMIC EMISSION
    SPECTROMETRIC METHOD FOR TRACE
    ELEMENT  ANALYSIS  OF WATER  AND
    WASTES METHOD 200.7

          1. Scope and Application

  1.1  This method may be  used for the de-
termination of dissolved, suspended, or total
elements in drinking water, surface  water,
and domestic and industrial wastewaters.
  1.2  Dissolved elements are determined in
filtered and acidified samples. Appropriate
steps must be taken in all analyses to ensure
that potential  interferences are taken into
account. This is especially true when dis-
solved solids exceed 1500 mg/L. (See Section
5.)
  1.3  Total elements are  determined after
appropriate digestion procedures  are  per-
formed. Since digestion techniques increase
the dissolved solids content of the samples,
appropriate steps must be  taken to correct
for potential interference effects.  (See Sec-
tion. 5.)
  1.4  Table 1  lists elements for which this
method applies along  with  recommended
wavelengths and typical  estimated instru-
mental detection limits using  conventional
pneumatic nebulization. Actual working de-
tection limits are sample dependent and as
the sample matrix  varies,  these concentra-
tions may also vary. In time, other elements
may be added as more information becomes
available and as required.
  1.5  Because  of  the  differences between
various makes and models of satisfactory in-
struments, no  detailed instrumental oper-
ating instructions can be provided. Instead,
the analyst is referred to the instruction
provided by the  manufacturer of the par-
ticular instrument.

           2. Summary of Method

  2.1  The  method describes a technique for
the simultaneous or sequential multielement
determination of trace elements in solution.
The basis of the method is  the measurement
of   atomic   emission   by   an   optical
spectroscopic   technique.    Samples   are
nebulized and the aerosol that is produced is
transported to  the plasma torch where  exci-
tation  occurs.  Characteristic  atomic-line
emission spectra are produced by a radio-fre-
quency inductively  coupled plasma (ICP).
The spectra are dispersed by a grating spec-
trometer and the intensities of the lines are
monitored  by  photomultiplier  tubes.  The
photocurrents  from   the   photomultiplier
tubes are processed and controlled by a com-
puter system. A background correction tech-
nique is required to compensate  for variable
background contribution to the determina-
tion of trace elements. Background must be
measured adjacent to analyte lines on sam-
ples during analysis.  The  position selected
for the background intensity  measurement,
on either or both sides of the analytical line,
will be determined by the complexity of the
spectrum adjacent to the analyte line. The
position used must be free  of spectral inter-
ference and reflect the same change in back-
ground intensity as occurs at the analyte
wavelength measured. Background correc-
tion is not required in cases  of line  broad-
ening  where  a   background   correction
measurement  would  actually degrade the
analytical  result.  The possibility  of addi-
tional interferences named in 5.1 (and tests
for their presence as described in 5.2)  should
also be recognized and appropriate correc-
tions made.

               3. Definitions
  3.1  Dissolved—Those elements  which will
pass through a 0.45 (im membrane filter.
  3.2  Suspended—Those elements which are
retained by a 0.45 nm membrane filter.
  3.3  Total—The concentration  determined
on  an unfiltered sample following  vigorous
digestion (Section 9.3), or the sum of the dis-
solved plus suspended concentrations. (Sec-
tion 9.1 plus 9.2).
  3.4  Total recoverable—The  concentration
determined on  an uufiltered sample fol-
lowing treatment  with hot, dilute mineral
acid (Section 9.4).
  3.5  Instrumental  detection limit—The  con-
centration  equivalent to a signal, due to the
analyte, which is  equal to  three times the
standard deviation of a series of ten replicate
measurements of a reagent blank signal at
the same wavelength.
  3.6  Sensitivity—The slope of the analytical
curve, i.e.  functional  relationship between
emission intensity and concentration.
  3.7  Instrument check standard—A multiele-
ment standard of known concentrations pre-
pared by the analyst to monitor and verify
instrument performance on a daily basis.
(See 7.6.1)
  3.8  Interference  check  sample—A  solution
containing  both  interfering  and  analyte
elemelts of known concentration that can be
used  to verify background  and interelement
correction  factors. (See 7.6.2.)
  3.9  Quality control sample—A solution ob-
tained from an outside source having known,
concentration values to be used to verify the
calibration standards. (See 7.6.3)
  3.10  Calibration   standards—A  series   of
known standard solutions  used by  the ana-
lyst for calibration of the instrument (i.e.,
preparation of the analytical curve). (See 7.4)
                                         322

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                          Pt. 136, App. C
  3.11  Linear dynamic range—The concentra-
tion range over which  the analytical curve
remains linear.
  3.12  Reagent blank—A volume of deionized,
distilled water containing the same acid ma-
trix as the  calibration  standards  carried
through the  entire analytical scheme. (See
7.5.2)
  3.13  Calibration blank—A volume of deion-
ized, distilled water acidified with HNO3 and
HC1. (See 7.5.1)
  3.14  Methmd of  standard  addition— The
standard addition technique involves the use
of  the  unknown and the unknown plus a
known amount of standard. (See 10.6.1.)

                 4. Safety

  4.1  The toxicity of carcinogeniclty of each
reagent used in this method has not  been
precisely  defined;  however, each chemical
compound should be  treated  as a potential
health hazard. Prom this viewpoint, expo-
sure to these chemicals must be reduced to
the lowest possible level by whatever means
available. The laboratory  is repsonsible for
maintaining  a  current awareness   file  of
OSHA  regulations  regarding-  the  safe  han-
dling of the chemicals specified in this meth-
od. A reference file  of material data handling
sheets  should also  be made available to  all
personnel involved  in the chemical analysis.
Additional references to  laboratory safety
are  available  and  have  been  identified
U47.i48andi4» for the information of the ana-
lyst.

              5. Interferences

  5.1  Several types  of interference effects
may contribute to inaccuracies in the deter-
mination  of  trace  elements. They can  be
summarized as follows:
  5.1.1  Spectral  interferences  can   be  cat-
egorized as (1) overlap of a spectral line from
another element; (2) unresolved overlap of
molecular band spectra; (3) background con-
tribution from continuous or  recombination
phenomena; and (4) background contribution
from stray light from  the line emission of
high concentration elements. The  first  of
these effects  can be compensated by utilizing
a computer correction  of  the raw data, re-
quiring the monitoring and measurement of
the interfering element. The second effect
may require  selection of an alternate wave-
length. The third and fourth effects can usu-
ally be compensated by a background correc-
tion adjacent to the analyte line. In addi-
tion, users of  simultaneous  multi-element
instrumentation must assume the responsi-
bility of verifying the absence of spectral in-
terference from an  element that could occur
in a sample but for which there is no channel
in the  instrument  array. Listed in  Table 2
are some  interference  effects for the rec-
ommended wavelengths given in Table 1. The
data in Table 2 are intended for use only as
a rudimentary guide for the indication of po-
tential spectral interferences. For this pur-
pose, linear relations between concentration
and  intensity  for  the  analytes  and  the
interferents  can  be assumed.  The  Inter-
ference information, which was collected at
the  Ames  Laboratory,1  is  expressed  as
analyte concentration equivalents (i.e. false
analyte concentrations) arising from 100 mg/
L of the interferent element.  The suggested
use of this information is as follows: Assume
that arsenic (at 193.696 nm) is to be  deter-
mined in a sample containing approximately
10 mg/L of aluminum. According to Table 2,
100 mg/L of aluminum would yield a false sig-
nal for arsenic equivalent  to  approximately
1.3  mg/L. Therefore,  10  mg/L of  aluminum
would result in a false signal for arsenic
equivalent to approximately 0.13 mg/L. The
reader is  cautioned  that   other  analytical
systems may exhibit somewhat different  lev-
els of interference  than those shown in Table
2, and that the interference effects must be
evaluated for each individual system.
  Only those interferents listed were  inves-
tigated and the blank spaces in Table 2 indi-
cate that measurable interferences were not
observed for the interferent concentrations
listed in  Table 3. Generally,  interferences
were  discernible if they produced peaks or
background shifts corresponding to 2-5% of
the  peaks generated by the analyte con-
centrations also listed in Table 3.
  At present, information on the listed silver
and potassium wavelengths  are not available
but it has been reported that second order
energy from the magnesium 383.231 nm wave-
length interferes with the  listed potassium
line at 766.491 nm.
  5.1.2 Physical interferences  are  generally
considered to be effects associated with the
sample nebulization and transport processes.
Such properties as change  in viscosity  and
surface  tension can cause  significant inac-
curacies  especially in samples which may
contain high dissolved solids and/or acid con-
centrations. The use of a peristaltic  pump
may lessen these interferences. If these types
of interferences are operative, they must be
reduced by dilution of the sample and/or uti-
lization of standard addition techniques.  An-
other problem  which can  occur from high
dissolved solids is salt buildup at the  tip of
the nebulizer. This affects  aersol flow rate
causing   instrumental  drift.  Wetting  the
argon prior to nebulization, the use of a tip
washer, or sample  dilution have been used to
control  this problem. Also, it has been re-
ported that better control of the argon flow
rate improves instrument performance. This
is accomplished with the use of mass flow
controllers.
         Laboratory,  USDOE,  Iowa  State
University, Ames Iowa 50011.
                                         323

-------
Pt.  136, App. C
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  5.1.3 Chemical Interferences are character-
ized by molecular compound formation, ion-
ization effects and solute vaporization ef-
fects. Normally these  effects are not  pro-
nounced with the ICP technique, however, if
observed they can be minimized by careful
selection of operating conditions (that is, in-
cident power, observation position,  and so
forth), by buffering of the sample, by matrix
matching-,  and by  standard  addition  proce-
dures. These  types of  interferences can be
highly dependent on matrix type  and the
specific analyte element.
  5.2  It  is recommended  that whenever a
new or unusual  sample matrix is encoun-
tered, a series of tests be performed prior to
reporting concentration data for analyte ele-
ments.  These tests,  as  outlined  in  5.2.1
through  5.2.4, will ensure  the analyst that
neither positive nor negative interference ef-
fects are operative on any of the analyte ele-
ments thereby distorting the accuracy of the
reported values.
  5.2.1 Serial  dilution.  If  the analyte  con-
centration is  sufficiently high (minimally a
factor of 10 above the instrumental detection
limit after dilution), an analysis of a dilu-
tion should agree  within  5 percent of the
original determination (or within some ac-
ceptable control limit (14.3) that has been es-
tablished for that matrix.). If not, a chemical
or physical interference effect should be sus-
pected.
  5.2.2 Spike  addition.  The  recovery  of a
spike addition added at a  minimum level of
10X the instrumental detection limit (max-
imum 100X) to the  original determination
should be recovered to  within 90 to 110 per-
cent or within the established control limit
for that  matrix.  If not,  a matrix  effect
should be  suspected. The  use of a standard
addition analysis procedure can usually com-
pensate for this effect.
  Caution'  The standard addition technique
does not detect coincident spectral overlap.
If suspected, use of computerized compensa-
tion, an alternate wavelength, or comparison
with  an  alternate method is recommended
(See 5.2.3).
  5.2.3 Comparison with alternate method  of
analysis.  When investigating a new sample
matrix, comparison tests may be performed
with  other analytical  techniques  such as
atomic absorption spectrometry, or other ap-
proved methodology.
  5.2.4 Wavelength scanning of analyte line re-
gion.  If the appropriate equipment  is avail-
able,  wavelength scanning can be performed
to detect potential spectral interferences.

                6. Apparatus

  6.1  Inductively  Coupled  Plasma-Atomic
Emission Spectrometer.
  6.1.1 Computer  controlled atomic emis-
sion spectrometer  with background correc-
tion.
  6.1.2 Radiofrequency generator.
  6.1.3  Argon gas supply, welding grade or
better.
  6.2  Operating conditions—Because of the
differences between various makes and mod-
els  of satisfactory instruments,  no detailed
operating instructions  can be provided.  In-
stead, the analyst should follow the instruc-
tions provided by the  manufacturer of the
particular  instrument.  Sensitivity,  instru-
mental detection limit, precision, linear dy-
namic range,  and interference effects  must
be investigated and established for each indi-
vidual analyte line on that particular instru-
ment. It is the responsibility of  the analyst
to verify that the instrument configuration
and operating conditions used satisfy the an-
alytical requirements and to maintain qual-
ity  control data confirming instrument per-
formance and  analytical results.

         7. Reagents and Standards

  7.1  Acids used in the preparation of stand-
ards  and for  sample  processing must  be
ultra-high purity grade or equivalent. Redis-
tilled acids are acceptable.
  7.1.1  Acetic  acid, cone, (sp gr 1.06).
  7.1.2 Hydrochloric acid, cone, (sp gr 1.19).
  7.1.3  Hydrochloric  acid, (1+1): Add 500 mL
cone. HC1 (sp gr 1.19) to 400 mL deionized,
distilled water and dilute to 1 liter.
  7.1.4 Nitric acid, cone, (sp gr 1.41).
  7.1.5 Nitric  acid,  (1+1): Add  500 mL  cone.
HNO3 (sp gr  1.41) to 400 mL deionized, dis-
tilled water and dilute to 1 liter.
  7.2  Deionized, distilled  water:  Prepare  by
passing distilled water through a mixed bed
of cation and  anion exchange resins. Use  de-
ionized, distilled water for the preparation of
all reagents, calibration standards and  as di-
lution water.  The purity of this  water must
be  equivalent to ASTM  Type  II reagent
water of Specification D 1193 (14.6).
  7.3  Standard stock solutions may be pur-
chased or prepared  from ultra high purity
grade chemicals or metals. All salts must be
dried for 1 h at 105 °C unless otherwise speci-
fied.
  (CAUTION:  Many  metal  salts  are  ex-
tremely toxic and may be fatal if swallowed.
Wash hands thoroughly after handling.)
  Typical stock solution preparation proce-
dures follow:
  7.3.1 Aluminum solution, stock,  I mL=100ug
Al:  Dissolve 0.100 g of aluminum  metal in an
acid mixture  of 4 mL of (1+1) HC1 and 1 mL
of cone.  HNO3 in a beaker. Warm gently to
effect solution. When solution is  complete,
transfer  quantitatively to a liter flask add
an additional 10 mL of (1+1) HC1 and dilute
to 1,000 mL with deionized, distilled water.
  7.3.2 Antimony solution stock, 1 mL=100 (ig
Sb: Dissolve 0.2669 g  K(SbO)C4H4O6 in deion-
ized distilled water,  add 10 mL (1+1) HC1 and
dilute to 1,000 mL with deionized, distilled
water.
                                          324

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           Pt.  136, App. C
  7.3.3  Arsenic  solution,  stock, 1 mL=100  jig
As: Dissolve 0.1320 g of As2O3 in 100 mL of de-
ionized,  distilled  water containing  0.4  g
NaOH. Acidify the solution with 2 mL cone.
HNO3 and dilute to 1,000 mL with  deionized,
distilled water.
  7.3.4  Barium  solution,  stock, 1 mL=100  (ig1
Ba: Dissolve 0.1516 g BaCl2 (dried at 250 °C for
2 hrs) in 10 mL deionized, distilled  water
with 1 mL  (1+1) HC1. Add 10.0 mL (1+1) HC1
and dilute  to 1,000 with  mL deionized, dis-
tilled water.
  7.3.5  Beryllium solution, stock, 1 mL=100 \ig
Be: Do  not  dry. Dissolve 1.966 g BeSO4-4H2O,
in  deionized, distilled  water, add 10.0 mL
oono. HNO3  and dilute to 1,000 mL with de-
ionized, distilled water.
  7.3.6  Boron solution, stock,  1 mL=100ug B:
Do  not dry. Dissolve 0.5716 g  anhydrous H3BO3
in  deionized, distilled water and dilute  to
1,000 mL. Use a reagent meeting ACS  speci-
fications, keep  the bottle tightly stoppered
and store in a desiccator to prevent the en-
trance of atmospheric moisture.
  7.3.7  Cadmium solution, stock, 1 mL=100  ug
Cd: Dissolve 0.1142  g CdO  in a  minimum
amount of (1+1) HNO3. Heat to increase rate
of dissolution. Add 10.0 mL cone.  HNO3 and
dilute to 1,000  mL with  deionized, distilled
water.
  7.3.8  Calcium solution, stock, 1 mL=100  jig
Ca: Suspend 0.2498 g CaCO3 dried at 180 °C for
1 h before  weighing  in deionized, distilled
water and  dissolve cautiously with a min-
imum amount  of (1+1) HNO3. Add 10.0 mL
eonc. HNO3  and dilute to 1,000 mL with de-
ionized, distilled water.
  7.3.9  Chromium solution, stock, 1 mL=100 |ig
Cr: Dissolve 0.1923 g of CrO3  in deionized, dis-
tilled  water. When  solution is  complete,
acidify with 10  mL cone. HNO3 and dilute to
1,000 mL with deionized, distilled water.
  7.3.10  Cobalt  solution,  stock, 1 mL=100  ug
Co: Dissolve 0.1000 g  of  cobalt  metal in a
minimum amount of (1+1) HNO3. Add 10.0 mL
(1+1) HC1 and dilute  to 1,000 mL  with deion-
ized, distilled water.
  7.3.11  Copper solution, stock, 1 mL=100  jig
Cu: Dissolve 0.1252  g CuO  in a  minimum
amount  of  (1+1) HNO3.  Add  10.0  mL  cone.
HNO3 and dilute to 1,000 mL with  deionized,
distilled water.
  7.3.12  Iron solution, stock, 1 mL=100 \ig Pe:
Dissolve 0.1430 g Fe2O3 in a  warm mixture of
20 mL (1+1) HC1 and  2  mL of cone. HNO3.
Cool,  add an additional 5 mL of cone. HNO3
and dilute  to 1,000 mL with deionized, dis-
tilled water.
  7.3.13  Lead solution, stock, 1 mL=100 og Pb:
Dissolve 0.1599  g  Pb(NO3)2  in a  minimum
amount  of  (1+1) HNO3.  Add  10.0  mL  cone.
HNO3 and dilute to 1,000 mL with  deionized,
distilled water.
  7.3.14 Magnesium solution, stock, 1  mL=100
(ig Mg: Dissolve 0.1658 g MgO in a minimum
amount  of  (1+1) HNO3.  Add  10.0  mL  cone.
HNO3 and dilute to 1,000 mL with deionized,
distilled water.
  7.3.15  Manganese solution, stock, 1 mL=100
ug Mn: Dissolve 0.1000 g of manganese metal
in the acid mixture 10 mL cone. HC1 and 1
mL cone. HNO3, and dilute to 1,000 mL with
deionized, distilled water.
  7.3.16  Molybdenum solution, stock, 1 mL=100
|ig Mo: Dissolve 0.2043 g (NROa MoO4 in deion-
ized, distilled water and dilute to 1,000 mL.
  7.3.17  Nickel solution,  stock,  1 mL=100  ug
Ni: Dissolve 0.1000 g of nickel metal in 10 mL
hot cone. HNO3, cool and dilute to 1,000 mL
with deionized, distilled water.
  7.3.18  Potassium  solution, stock, 1 mL=100
ug K: Dissolve 0.1907 g KC1, dried at 110 °C, in
deionized, distilled water and dilute to 1,000
mL.
  7.3.19  Selenium solution, stock, 1 mL=100  ug
Se: Do not dry. Dissolve  0.1727  g H2SeO3 (ac-
tual  assay 94.6%) in deionized, distilled water
and dilute to 1,000 mL.
  7.3.20  Silica solution,  stock,  1 mL=100  ug
SiO2a   Do   not    dry.   Dissolve  0.4730   g
Na2SiO3-9H2O in deionized, distilled water.
Add  10.0 mL  cone. HNO3 and dilute to 1,000
mL with deionized, distilled water.
  7.3.21  Silver solution,  stock,  1 mL=100  jig
Ag: Dissolve 0.1575 g AgNO3 in  100 mL of de-
ionized,  distilled  water and  10 mL cone.
HNO3. Dilute to 1,000 mL with deionized, dis-
tilled water.
  7.3.22  Sodium solution,  stock,  1 mL=100  ug
Na: Dissolve 0.2542 g NaCl in deionized, dis-
tilled water.  Add 10.0 mL cone. HNO3 and di-
lute  to  1,000 mL  with  deionized,  distilled
water.
  7.3.23  Thallium solution, stock, 1 mL=100  jig
Tl: Dissolve  0.1303  g T1NO3 in deionized, dis-
tilled water.  Add 10.0 mL eonc. HNO3 and di-
lute  to  1,000 mL  with  deionized,  distilled
water.
  7.3.24  Vanadium  solution, stock, 1 mL=100
ug V: Dissolve 0.2297 NK, VO3 in a minimum
amount of cone. HNO3. Heat to increase rate
of dissolution. Add 10.0 mL cone. HNO3 and
dilute to 1,000 mL with deionized,  distilled
water.
  7.3.25  Zinc solution, stock, 1 mL=100 ug Zn:
Dissolve 0.1245 g ZnO in a minimum amount
of dilute HNO3. Add 10.0  mL  cone. HNO3 and
dilute to 1,000 mL  deionized, distilled water.
  7.4  Mixed  calibration  standard solutions—
Prepare  mixed calibration  standard  solu-
tions by combining appropriate volumes  of
the  stock solutions  in  volumetric flasks.
(See 7.4.1 thru 7.4.5) Add 2 mL  of (1+1) HNO3
and 10 mL of (1+1) HC1 and dilute to 100 mL
with deionized, distilled  water. (See Notes 1
and 6.) Prior to preparing the  mixed  stand-
ards, each stock solution should be analyzed
separately to determine possible spectral in-
terference or the  presence of impurities.
Care  should   be taken when preparing the
                                           325

-------
Pt, 136, App. C
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
mixed standards that the elemelts are com-
patible and stable. Transfer the mixed stand-
ard solutions to a FEP fluorocarbon or un-
used polyethylene bottle  for storage. Fresh
mixed standards should be prepared as need-
ed with  the realization that concentration
can change on aging. Calibration standards
must  be initially verified using  a quality
control  sample  and monitored weekly for
stability (See 7.6.3).  Although  not specifi-
cally  required,   some  typical   calibration
standard combinations follow  when  using
those specific wavelengths listed in Table 1.
  7.4.1 Mixed   standard  solution   I—Man-
ganese, beryllium, cadmium, lead, and zinc.
  7.4.2 Mixed  standard  solution  77—Barium,
copper, iron, vanadium, and cobalt.
  7.4.3 Mixed  standard  solution III—Molyb-
denum, silica, arsenic, and selenium,
  7.4.4 Mixed standard solution IV—Calcium,
sodium,  potassium,  aluminum, chromium
and nickel.
  7.4.5 Mixed  standard solution V—  Anti-
mony, boron,  magnesium, silver, and thal-
lium.
  NOTE: 1. If the addition of silver to the rec-
ommended acid combination results in an
initial precipitation, add  15 mL of  deionized
distilled water and warm  the flask until the
solution clears.  Cool and dilute to 100 mL
with deionized, distilled water. For this acid
combination the silver concentration should
be limited to 2 mg/L. Silver under these con-
ditions is stable in a tap water matrix for 30
days.  Higher concentrations of silver require
additional HC1.
  7.5  Two  types  of blanks are  required for
the analysis. The calibration blank (3.13) is
used  in  establishing the analytical  curve
while the reagent blank (3.12) is used to cor-
rect  for possible contamination  resulting
from  varying amounts  of the acids used in
the sample processing.
  7.5.1 The calibration blank is  prepared by
diluting  2 mL  of (1+1)  HNO3 and  10 mL of
(1+1) HC1 to 100 mL with  deionized, distilled
water. (See Note 6.)  Prepare  a sufficient
quantity to be used to  flush the system be-
tween standards and samples.
  7.5.2 The reagent blank must contain all
the reagents and in  the same volumes  as
used in the processing  of the samples. The
reagent blank must be carried  through the
complete procedure and  contain the same
acid concentration in the final solution as
the sample solution used for analysis.
  7.6  In addition to  the  calibration stand-
ards,  an instrument check standard (3.7), an
interference check sample (3.8) and a quality
control  sample (3.9) are also required for the
analyses.
  7.6.1 The instrument check standard is pre-
pared by the analyst  by combining compat-
ible elements at  a concentration equivalent
to the midpoint  of their  respective calibra-
tion curves. (See 12.1.1.)
  7.6.2  The interference check sample  is pre-
pared by the analyst in the following man-
ner.  Select a representative  sample which
contains  minimal  concentrations  of  the
analytes of interest but known concentra-
tion of interfering elements that will provide
an adequate test of the correction factors.
Spike the sample with the elements of inter-
est at  the  approximate concentration of ei-
ther 100 ug/L or 5 times the estimated detec-
tion limits given in Table 1. (For effluent
samples  of expected  high concentrations,
spike at an appropriate level.) If the type of
samples analyzed are varied, a synthetically
prepared sample  may  be used if the above
criteria and intent are  met.
  7.6.3  The quality  control sample should be
prepared in the same acid matrix as the cali-
bration standards at a concentration near 1
mg/L  and  in accordance with the instruc-
tions provided by the  supplier. The Quality
Assurance  Branch of EMSL-Cincinnati will
either supply a quality control sample or in-
formation where one of equal quality can be
procured. (See 12.1.3.)

     8. Sample Handling and Preservation
  8.1  For  the  determination of trace  ele-
ments, contamination  and loss are of prime
concern. Dust  in the laboratory  environ-
ment, impurities in reagents and impurities
on laboratory apparatus which the sample
contacts are all sources of potential  con-
tamination.  Sample  containers  can intro-
duce either positive or negative errors in the
measurement of trace elements by (a) con-
tributing contaminants through leaching or
surface desorption and (b)  by depleting con-
centrations through  adsorption. Thus  the
collection and treatment of the sample prior
to  analysis  requires  particular attention.
Laboratory glassware  including the  sample
bottle  (whether polyethylene, polyproplyene
or FEP-fluorocarbon)  should be thoroughly
washed with detergent and tap water; rinsed
with (1+1) nitric acid, tap water, (1+1) hydro-
chloric acid, tap and  finally deionized,  dis-
tilled water in that order (See Notes 2 and 3).
  NOTE: 2. Chromic acid may be useful to re-
move organic deposits from glassware; how-
ever, the  analyst should be cautioned that
the glassware  must  be thoroughly rinsed
with water to remove the last traces of chro-
mium.  This  is especially  important  if
chromium is to be included in the analytical
scheme.     A     commercial     product,
NOCHROMIX, available from G-odax Labora-
tories, 6 Varick  St.,  New York,  NY 10013,
may be used in place of chromic acid. Chro-
mic acid should not be used with plastic bot-
tles.
  NOTE: 3.  If it can be documented through
an active analytical quality control program
using  spiked samples and reagent blanks,
that certain steps in the cleaning procedure
are not required for routine samples, those
steps may be eliminated from the procedure.
                                          326

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                          Pt. 136, App. C
  8.2  Before collection of the sample a deci-
sion must be made as to the type of data de-
sired, that is dissolved, suspended or total,
so  that the  appropriate  preservation and
pretreatment steps  may  be  accomplished.
Filtration, acid preservation,  etc., are to be
performed  at the time the sample is col-
lected or as soon as possible thereafter.
  8.2.1  For the determination  of dissolved
elements   the  sample  must  be  filtered
through a 0.45-jim membrane filter as soon as
practical after collection. (Glass  or plastic
filtering  apparatus   are  recommended  to
avoid possible contamination.) Use the first
50-100 mL  to rinse the filter flask.  Discard
this portion and collect the required volume
of filtrate.  Acidify  the filtrate with  (1+1)
HNO3 to a pH of 2 or less. Normally, 3 mL of
(1+1) acid  per liter  should be sufficient  to
preserve the sample.
  8.2.2  For the determination of suspended
elements a measured volume of unpreserved
sample  must be filtered through a 0.45-|im
membrane  filter as  soon as practical  after
collection. The  filter  plus  suspended mate-
rial should be transferred to a suitable con-
tainer for storage and/or shipment.  No pre-
servative is required.
  8.2.3  For the determination of total  or
total recoverable elements, the sample is
acidified with (1+1) HNO3 to pH 2 or less as
soon as possible, preferably at the  time of
collection.  The sample is not  filtered before
processing.

           9. Sample Preparation
  9.1  For  the determinations of dissolved
elements, the filtered, preserved sample may
often be analyzed as received. The acid ma-
trix and concentration of the samples and
calibration standards must be the same. (See
Note 6.) If a precipitate formed upon acidifi-
cation  of the sample or during transit  or
storage, it must be  redissolved before the
analysis by adding additional  acid and/or  by
heat as  described in 9.3.
  9.2  For  the determination  of  suspended
elements,  transfer the membrane filter con-
taining the insoluble  material to a 150-mL
Griffin  beaker and add 4 mL cone. HNO3.
Cover the  beaker with a watch  glass and
heat gently.  The  warm acid  will soon dis-
solve the  membrane. Increase  the tempera-
ture of the hot plate and digest the material.
When the acid has nearly  evaporated, cool
the beaker and watch glass and add  another
3 mL  of  cone.  HNO3.  Cover and continue
heating until the digestion is complete, gen-
erally indicated by a light colored digestate.
Evaporate to near dryness (2 mL), cool, and
10 mL HC1 (1+1) and  15 mL deionized, dis-
tilled water  per 100  mL dilution and warm
the beaker gently for 15 min. to dissolve any
precipitated  or  residue  material. Allow  to
cool, wash  down the  watch glass and beaker
walls with deionized distilled water and fil-
ter the  sample to remove insoluble material
that could clog the nebulizer. (See Note 4.)
Adjust  the  volume based on the expected
concentrations of elements present. This vol-
ume will vary depending on the elements to
be determined (See Note 6).  The sample is
now ready for analysis.  Concentrations so
determined shall be reported as "suspended."
  NOTE: 4. In  place of filtering,  the sample
after diluting and mixing may be centrifuged
or allowed to  settle by gravity overnight to
remove insoluble material.
  9.3  For the determination  of total  ele-
ments, choose a measured volume of the well
mixed acid preserved sample appropriate for
the expected level  of elements and transfer
to a Griffin beaker. (See Note 5.) Add 3 mL
of cone. HNO3.  Place the beaker on a hot
plate and evaporate to near dryness  cau-
tiously, making certain that the sample does
not boil and that  no area of the bottom of
the beaker is allowed  to  go dry. Cool the
beaker  and  add another  5  mL portion of
cone. HNO3. Cover  the beaker with a watch
glass and return to the hot plate. Increase
the temperature of the hot plate so  that a
gently reflux  action occurs.  Continue heat-
ing,  adding  additional acid  as  necessary,
until the digestion is complete (generally in-
dicated when the digestate is light in color
or does not  change in appearance with con-
tinued refluxing.)  Again,  evaporate to  near
dryness and cool the beaker. Add 10 mL of
1+1 HC1 and  15 mL of deionized, distilled
water per 100 mL of final solution and warm
the beaker gently for 15 min. to dissolve any
precipitate or residue resulting from evapo-
ration. Allow to cool, wash down the beaker
walls and watch glass with  deionized  dis-
tilled water and filter the sample to remove
insoluble  material that  could  clog   the
nebulizer. (See Note 4.) Adjust the sample to
a predetermined volume  based  on the ex-
pected concentrations of elements present.
The  sample  is now ready  for analysis  (See
Note 6). Concentrations so determined shall
be reported as "total."
  NOTE: 5. If low determinations of boron are
critical, quartz glassware should be used.
  NOTE: 6. If the sample analysis solution has
a  different  acid concentration  from  that
given in 9.4, but does not introduce a phys-
ical interference or affect the analytical re-
sult, the same calibration standards may be
used.
  9.4  For the determination of total recov-
erable  elements, choose a  measured volume
of a well mixed, acid preserved sample appro-
priate for the expected level of elements and
transfer to a  Griffin beaker. (See Note  5.)
Add  2 mL of (1+1) HNO3 and  10 mL  of  (1+1)
HC1 to the sample  and heat on a steam  bath
or hot plate  until  the volume has been re-
duced to near 25 mL making certain the sam-
ple does not boil. After this treatment, cool
the sample  and filter to  remove insoluble
material that could clog the nebulizer.  (See
Note 4.) Adjust the volume  to 100 mL and
                                         327

-------
Pt.  136, App. C
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
mix. The sample is now ready for analysis.
Concentrations so determined shall be re-
ported as "total."

               10. Procedure

  10.1  Set up instrument with proper oper-
ating parameters established in Section 6.2.
The instrument must be allowed to become
thermally stable before beginning. This usu-
ally requires at least 30 min. of operation
prior to calibration.
  10.2  Initiate appropriate operating  con-
figuration of computer.
  10.3  Profile and calibrate instrument ac-
cording  to  instrument manufacturer's rec-
ommended  procedures,  using the typical
mixed calibration  standard  solutions  de-
scribed in Section 7.4. Flush the system with
the  calibration  blank  (7.5.1)  between  each
standard. (See Note 7.) (The use of the aver-
age intensity of multiple exposures for both
standardization  and  sample  analysis  has
been found to reduce random error.)
  NOTE: 7. For boron concentrations greater
than 500 |ig/L extended  flush times of 1 to 2
minutes  may be required.
  10.4  Before beginning the sample run, re-
analyze the highest mixed calibration stand-
ard as if  it were a sample. Concentration val-
ues obtained should not deviate from the ac-
tual values  by more than ±5 percent (or the
established  control  limits  whichever  is
lower). If they do,  follow the recommenda-
tions of the instrument manufacturer to cor-
rect for this condition.
  10.5  Begin the sample run  flushing  the
system with the  calibration blank solution
(7.5.1)  between each sample.  (See Note  7.)
Analyze   the  instrument   check  standard
(7.6.1) and the calibration blank  (7.5.1)  each
10 samples.
  10.6  If it has been found  that  methods of
standard addition are required, the following
procedure is recommended.
  10.6.1   The standard  addition  technique
(14.2) involves  preparing new  standards in
the sample matrix by adding known amounts
of standard to one or more aliquots of the
processed sample  solution. This technique
compensates for a sample constitutent that
enhances or depresses the  analyte signal
thus producing a different slope from that of
the calibration standards. It will  not correct
for  additive interference  which  causes  a
baseline  shift. The simplest version of this
technique is the single-addition method. The
procedure   is  as  follows.   Two  identical
aliquots  of the sample solution, each of vol-
ume Vx,  are taken. To the first (labeled A) is
added a  small  volume V,  of a  standard
analyte solution of concentration cs. To the
second (labeled B) is added the same volume
Vs of the solvent. The analytical signals of A
and B  are measured  and  corrected  for
nonanalyte  signals. The unknown sample
concentration Cx is calculated:
where SA and SB are the analytical signals
(corrected for the blank) of solutions A and
B, respectively. V, and cs should be chosen so
that SA is roughly twice SB on the average.
It is best if Vs is made  much  less than Vx,
and thus cs is much greater than cx, to avoid
excess  dilution of the sample matrix. If a
separation or concentration step is used, the
additions are best made first and carried
through the entire procedure. For the results
from this technique to be valid, the following
limitations  must be  taken into consider-
ation:
  1. The analytical curve must be linear.
  2. The chemical form of the analyte  added
must respond the same as the analyte in the
sample.
  3. The interference effect must be constant
over the working  range of concern.
  4. The signal must be corrected for any ad-
ditive interference.

              11. Calculation
  11.1  Reagent blanks (7.5.2) should be sub-
tracted from all samples. This is particularly
important  for digested samples  requiring
large quantities of acids to complete the di-
gestion.
  11.2  If dilutions were performed, the ap-
propriate factor must be applied  to sample
values.
  11.3  Data should be rounded to the thou-
sandth place and all  results should be re-
ported in mg/L up to three significant fig-
ures.

      12. Quality Control  (Instrumental)
  12.1  Check  the instrument standardiza-
tion by analyzing appropriate quality con-
trol check standards as follow:
  12.1.1  Analyze and appropriate instrument
check  standard  (7.6.1)  containing the  ele-
ments of interest at a frequency of 10%. This
check standard is used to determine instru-
ment drift. If agreement is not within ±5% of
the expected values or within the established
control limits, whichever is lower, the anal-
ysis is out of control. The analysis should be
terminated, the problem corrected,  and the
instrument recalibrated.
  Analyze the calibration blank (7.5.1) at a
frequency of 10%. The result should be with-
in the  established control limits of 2 stand-
ard deviations of the meal value.  If not, re-
peat the analysis two more times and aver-
age the three results. If the average is not
wihin the control limit,  terminate the anal-
ysis, correct the problem and recalibrate the
instrument.
  12.1.2  To  verify interelement  and  back-
ground correction factors analyze the  inter-
ference check sample  (7.6.2) at the beginning,
                                          328

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           Pt. 136, App. C
end, and at periodic intervals throughout the
sample run.  Results should  fall  within the
established control limits of 1.5 times the
standard deviation of the mean value. If not,
terminate  the analysis, correct the problem
and recalibrate the instrument.
  12.1.3 A quality control sample (7.6.3) ob-
tained from  an  outside source  must first be
used for the initial verification of the cali-
bration standards. A fresh dilution of this
sample shall be analyzed  every week there-
after to monitor  their stability. If the re-
sults are  not within ±5%  of the  true value
listed for the control sample, prepare a new
calibration standard and recalibrate the in-
strument.  If this  does  not correct the prob-
lem, prepare a new stock standard and a new
calibration standard and repeat the calibra-
tion.

         13.  Precision and Accuracy

  13.1  An  interlaboratory study of metal
analyses by  this  method  was conducted  by
the Quality Assurance Branch  (QAB) of the
Environmental Monitoring Systems Labora-
tory—Cincinnati (EMSL-CI). Synthetic con-
centrates  containing' various levels  of the
twenty-five elements listed in  Table 4  were
added to reagent water, surface water, drink-
ing water and three effluents. These samples
were  digested by both the  total digestion
procedure (9.3) and the  total recoverable pro-
cedure (9.4).  Results for both digestions for
the twenty-five elements in reagent water
are given  in  Table  4;  results for the other
matrices can be  found in Reference 14.10.

               14. References

  14.1  Winge, R.K., V.J. Peterson,  and V.A.
Fassel, "Inductively Coupled  Plasma-Atomic
Emission   Spectroscopy: Prominent  Lines,
EPA-600/4-79-017.
  14.2  Winefordner,  J.D.,  "Trace Analysis:
Spectroscopic Methods for Elements," Chem-
ical Analysis,  Vol, 46, pp. 41-42.
  14.3  Handbook  for   Analytical   Quality
Control in Water and  Wastewater Labora-
tories, EPA-600/4-79-019.
  14.4  Garbarino, J.R.  and Taylor, H.E., "An
Inductively-Coupled  Plasma  Atomic Emis-
sion  Spectrometric Method  for  Routine
Water Quality  Testing," Applied Spectros-
copy 33, No. 3 (1979).
  14.5  "Methods for Chemical Analysis  of
Water and  Wastes," EPA-600/4-79-020.
  14.6  Annual Book  of ASTM  Standards,
Part 31.
  14.7  "Carcinogens—Working With Carcino-
gens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Public Health Service,  Center for
Disease Control, National Institute for Occu-
pational Safety and Health, Publication No.
77-206, August 1977.
  14.8  "OSHA Safety and Health Standards,
General Industry," (29 CFR Part 1910), Occu-
pational Safety and Health Administration,
OSHA 2206, (Revised, January 1976).
  14.9  "Safety in  Academic Chemistry Lab-
oratories, American Chemical Society Publi-
cation,  Committee on  Chemical Safety, 3rd
Edition, 1979.
  14.10  Maxfield  R.  and  Minak  B.,  "EPA
Method Study 27,  Method 200.7 Trace Metals
by  ICP," National  Technical Information
Service,  Order No. PB 85-248-656,  November
1983.

 TABLE 1—RECOMMENDED WAVELENGTHS 1 AND
  ESTIMATED INSTRUMENTAL DETECTION LIMITS
Element
Aluminum
Arsenic . . .
Antimony
Barium .
Beryllium .. . . 	
Boron
Cadmium 	
Calcium 	 	
Chromium
Cobalt 	
Copper . . .
Iron . . 	
Lead 	
Magnesium
Manganese . .
Molybdenum 	
Nickel
Potassium . ....
Selenium . ...
Silica (SiO2) 	
Silver 	
Sodium . ...
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc . 	
Wave-
length,
nm
308.215
193696
206 833
455 403
313042
249 773
226.502
317933
267 716
228616
324 754
259 940
220 353
279 079
257610
202 030
231.604
766 491
196 026
288.158
328.068
588 995
190864
292 402
213.856
Estimated
detection
limit, ng/L2
45
53
32
2
03
5
4
10
7
7
6
7
42
30
2
8
15

75
58
7
29
40
8
2
  'The wavelengths listed are recommended because of their
sensitivity and overall acceptance Other wavelengths may be
substituted if they can provide the needed sensitivity and are
treated with the same corrective techniques for spectral inter-
ference. (See 511)
  2The estimated instrumental detection limits as shown are
taken from "Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic  Emission
Spectroscopy-Promment Lines," EPA-600/4-79-017 They
are given as a guide  tor an instrumental limit The actual
method detection limits are sample dependent and  may vary
as the sample matrix varies
  3Highly dependent on operating conditions and plasma
position.
TABLE 1—ANALYTE CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENTS (MG/L) ARISING FROM INTERFERENTS AT THE 100
                                       MG/L LEVEL
Analyte
AFummum 	
Wave-
length,
nm
308 214
Interferent —
A1

Ca

Cr

Cu

Fe

Mg

Mn
0.21
Ni

Ti

y
1 4
                                          329

-------
Pt. 136, App. C
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
TABLE 1—ANALYTE CONCENTRATION EQUIVALENTS (MG/L) ARISING FROM INTERFERENTS AT THE 100
                              MG/L LEVEL—Continued
Analyle

Arsenic 	



Calcium 	
Chromium 	
Cobalt . ...
Copper 	
Iron .. ...
Lead ..
Magnesium 	
Manganese 	
Molybdenum . ...
Nickel . .
Selenium
Silicon 	
Thallium 	
Vanadium 	

Wave-
length,
nm
206 833
193696
455 403
313042
249 773
226.502
317.933
267716
228.616
324 754
259 940
220 353
279 079
257.610
202 030
231.604
196026
288.158
588 995
190.864
292.402
213856
Interferent —
A1
047
1.3
004
017
0005
0.05
023
0.30
Ca

002

Cr
2.9
044
0.08
0.03
0.11
0.01
007
005
Cu





014
Fe
008


032
003
0.01
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.13
0002
003
009

0005
Mg






001

0.002




Mn






004
004
012
0.25





Ni





002
0.03



029
Tl
0.25
004

0.03
0.15
0.05
007

008
0.02
V
045
1 1
0.05

003
0.04
002
0.12

0.01

  TABLE 3—INTERFERENT AND ANALYTE ELEMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS USED FOR INTERFERENCE
                             MEASUREMELTS IN TABLE 2











Analytes
Al 	
AS 	 	
B 	
Ba
Be
Ca.. . . 	
Cd 	
Co
Cr .. . .
Cu 	
Fe 	
Mg 	
Mn . .. . 	
Mo 	
Na 	
Ni 	
Pb 	
Sb 	
Se 	
Si 	
Tl
V 	
Zn 	
(mg/L)
10
10
10
1
1
1
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
10
1
10











Interterents
Al 	
Ca 	
Cr 	
Cu
Fe 	
Mg 	
Mn .
Ni
Ti 	
V 	



(mg/L)
1,000
1,000
200
200
1 000
1,000
200
200
200
200














                     TABLE 4—ICP PRECISION AND RECOVERY DATA
Analyte
Aluminum 	 	
Antimony 	 	
Barium 	 	
Concentration
ng/L
69-4792
77-1406
69-1887
9-377
Total digestion (9 3)
ng/L
X=0 9273(C)+3 6
S=00559(X)+18.6
SR=0 0507(X)+3 5
X=0.7940(C)-17.0
S=0.1556(X)-06
SR=0.1081(X)+3.9
X-1 Q437(C)-12.2
S=0 1239(X)+2.4
SR=0 0874(X)+6.4
X=0.7683(C)+0.47
Recoverable digestion
(9 4) ug/L
X=0.9380(C)+22.1
S=0.0873(X)+31.7
SR=0.0481(X)+188
X=0 8908(C)+0 9
S=0.0982(X)+8 3
SR=0 0682(X)+2.5
X=1 0175(C)+3.9
S=01288(X)+61
SR=00643(X)+103
X=0 8380(C)+1 68
                                      330

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 136, App. C
                  TABLE 4—ICP PRECISION AND RECOVERY DATA—Continued
Analyte
Beryllium 	
Cadmium 	 	

Cobalt ... 	
Iron . . 	
Lead


Molybdenum 	
Nickel

Selenium . . 	
Silver . . 	
Sodium 	 	
Thallium . . 	 ...
Vanadium 	 ....
Zinc 	
Concentration
ug/L
3-1906
19-5189
9-1943
17-47170
13-1406
17-2340
8-1887
13-9359
42-4717
34-13868
4-1887
17-1830
17-47170
347-14151
69-1415
189-9434
8-189
36-47170
79-1434
13-4698
7-7076
Total digestion (9.3)
ug/L
S=01819(X)+278
SR=01285(X)+255
X=0 9629(C)+0 05
S=00136(X)+095
SR=00203(X)-007
X-0.8807(C)-f9 0
S=01150(X)+141
SR=0 0742(X)+23.2
X=09874(C)-018
S=0 557(X)+2 02
SR=0.0300(X)+0.94
X-09182(C)-26
S=01228(X)+101
SR=00189(X)+37
X-0 9544(C)+3 1
S=0 0499(X)+4.4
SR=0.0009(XH7.9
X=0.9209(C)-4.5
S=0.0436(X)+3.8
SR=0.0428(XH0.5
X-09297JQ-030
S=0.0442(X)+2.85
SR=00128(X)+2.53
X=0.8829(C)+7 0
S=0 0683(X)+1 1 5
SR=00046(X)+10.0
X-0.9699(C)-22
3=0 0558(X)+7 0
SR=0.0353(X)+3 6
X-0 9881 (C)-1 1
3=0 0607(C)+1 1 6
SR=0 0298(X)+0 6
X-09417(C)+0 13
S=0 0324(X)+ 0 88
SR=00153(X)+091
X-0.9682(C)+0 1
S=00618(X)+1 6
SR=00371(X)+22
X-0.9508(C)+0 4
S=0 0604(X)+4 4
SR=0 0425(X)+3 6
X=0.8669(C) - 36 4
S=0 0934(X)+77 8
SR=00099(X)+1442
X=09363(C)-25
S=00855(X)+178
SR=0.0284(X)+9.3
X=0.5742(C) 35 6
S=04160(X)+378
SR=01987(X)+84
X=0 4466(C)+5 07
S=05055(X)-305
SR=02086(X)-1.74
X=09581(C)+396
S=0 2097(X)+33 0
SR=00280(X)+1058
X=09020(C)-73
S=0.1004(X)+183
SR=0.0364(X)+1 1 5
X=0.9615(C)-20
8=0.061 8(X)+1. 7
SR=0 0220(XH0.7
X=09356(C)-030
S=00914(X)+375
SR=0.0130(X)+10.7
Recoverable digestion
(94)ng/L
S=0 2540(X)+0 30
SR=0.0826(XH3 54
X=1.0177(C)-055
S=0 0359(X)r0.90
SR=00445(X)-010
X-09676(C)+187
S=0.1320(X)+160
SR=0.0743(X)+21 1
X=1 0137(C)-065
S=00585(X)+1 15
SR=0.332(X)+0 90
X-0 9658(C)+0 8
S=0.0917(X)+69
SR=00327(X)+101
X-1 0049(C) 1 2
S=0.0698(X)+2 8
SR=00571(X)+1 0
X=0.9278(C)-1.5
S=0 0498(X)+2 6
SR=0 0407(X)+0 4
X-0 9647(C) 3 64
S=0 0497(X)+2 28
SR=0 0406(X)+0 96
X=0 9830(C)+5 7
S=0 1024(X)+13.0
SR=00790(X)+11 5
X-1 0056(CK4 1
S=0.0779(X)+4.6
SR=0 0448(X)+3 5
X-0 9879(C)+2 2
S=00564(X)+13.2
SR=0 0268(X)+8 1
X-0 9725(C)+0 07
S=0 0557(X)+0 76
SR=0 0400(X)+0 82
X-0.9707(C)-23
3=0.081 1(XH3.8
SR=0 0529(X)+2 1
X-0 9869(C)+1 5
S=0 0526(X)+5 5
SR=0 0393(X)+2 2
X-09355(C)-183 1
3=0.0481 (X)+1 77.2
SR=0 0329(X)+60 9
X=09737(C)-1 0
S=01523(X)+78
SR=0.0443(X)+6.6
X-0 9737JC) 60 8
S=0.3288(X)+46.0
SR=02133(X)+226
X=0 3987(C)+8 25
S=05478(X)-393
SR=01836(X)-027
X=1 0526(C)+26 7
S=01473(X)+274
SR=0 0884(X)+50 5
X=0 9238(C)+5 5
S=02156(X)+57
SR=00106(X)+480
X-09551(C)+04
S=0 0927(X)+1 6
SR=0.0472(X)+0 5
X=0.9500(C)+1.82
S=0 0597(X)+6.50
SR=00153(X)+7.78
  AAAAAX=Mean Recovery, H9/L
  AAAAAC=True Value for the Concentration, ug/L
  AAAAAS=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, ug/L
  SR=Smgle-analyst Standard Deviation, pg/L


[49 PR 43431, Oct. 26, 1984; 50 FR 695, 696, Jan. 4, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 23703, June 30, 1986;
55 FR 33440, Aug. 15, 1990]
                                           331

-------
Pt.  136,App. D
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
APPENDIX  D  TO  PART  136— PRECISION
    AND  RECOVERY   STATEMENTS  FOR
    METHODS FOR MEASURING METALS

  Twenty-eight   selected   methods   from
"Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and
Wastes," EPA-600/4-79-020 (1979) have  been
subjected to interlaboratory method valida-
tion studies. The following precision and re-
covery statements are presented in this  ap-
pendix and incorporated into part 136:

               Method 202.1

  For Aluminum, Method 202.1 (Atomic Ab-
sorption, Direct Aspiration) replace the Pre-
cision  and Accuracy  Section  with the fol-
lowing:

          Precision and Accuracy
  An interlaboratory  study on metal  anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB)  of the
Environmental Monitoring Systems Labora-
tory—Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic
concentrates containing various  levels of
this element were added to reagent water
and a natural  water or effluent of the ana-
lyst's choice.  The digestion procedure was
not specified. Results for the reagent water
are given below.  Results  for  other water
types and study details are found in "USEPA
Method Study  7, Analyses for Trace Methods
in water by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direction Aspiration) and Colorimetry", Na-
tional  Technical  Information Service,  5285
Port Royal Road, Springfield,  VA 22161,
Order No. PB86-208709/AS, Winter, J.A. and
Britton, P.W., June, 1986.
  For a concentration range of 500-1200 ng/L
X=0.979(C)+6.16
S=0.066(X)+125
SR=0.086(X)+40.5
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, jigfL
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation,  \ig/
    L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation,
               Method 206.4

  For      Arsenic,      Method      206.4
(Spectrophotometric-SDDC)  add  the  fol-
lowing to the Precision  and Accuracy Sec-
tion:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory  study on metal anal-
yses by this method  was conducted by the
Quality  Assurance Branch  (QAB)  of  the
Environmental Monitoring Systems Labora-
tory—Cincinnati (EMSL-CI).  Synthetic con-
centrates containing  various levels  of this
element were added to reagent water and a
natural water  or  effluent  of the analyst's
choice. Results for the  reagent water are
given below.  Results  for other water types
and study details are found in "USEPA Meth-
od Study 7, Analyses for Trace Methods in
Water  by Atomic  Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direct Aspiration) and Colorimetry",  Na-
tional  Technical Information Service,  5285
Port  Royal  Road, Springfield,  VA  22161,
Order No. PB86-208709/AS, Winter, J.A.  and
Britton, P.W., June, 1986.
  For a concentration range of 20-292 |jg/L
X=0.850(C)-0.25
S=0.198(X)+5.93
SR=0.122(X)+3.10
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, jtg/L
X=Mean Recovery,  ng/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, \igl
  L
SR=Single-analyst  Standard Deviation, |ig/L

               Method 213.1

  For Cadmium, Method 213.1  (Atomic  Ab-
sorption, Direct Aspiration) replace the Pre-
cision  and  Accuracy  Section with the  fol-
lowing:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory  study  on metal anal-
yses by this  method  was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati    (EMSLi-CI).  Synthetic   con-
centrates containing  various levels  of  this
element were added to reagent water and a
natural water  or  effluent  of the analyst's
choice.  The  digestion  procedure was  not
specified. Results for  the reagent water are
given below.  Results  for other water types
and study details are found in "USEPA Meth-
od Study 7, Analyses for Trace Methods in
Water  by Atomic  Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direct Aspiration) and Colorimetry",  Na-
tional  Technical Information Service,  5285
Port  Royal  Road, Springfield,  VA  22161,
Order No. PB86-208709/AS, Winter, J.A.  and
Britton, P.W., June, 1986.
  For a concentration range of 14-78 ng/L
X=0.919(C)+2.97
S=0.108(X)+5.08
SR=0.120(X)+0.89
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ug/L
X=Mean Recovery,  ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, \igl
  L
SR=Single-analyst  Standard Deviation, ug/L

               Method 218.1

  For Chromium, Method 218.1  (Atomic  Ab-
sorption, Direct Aspiration) replace the Pre-
cision  and  Accuracy  Section with the  fol-
lowing:
                                         332

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                          Pt. 136, App. D
           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted  by  the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic  con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added  to reagent water and a
natural water or effluent of the analyst's
choice.  The digestion  procedure was  not
specified.  Results for the reagent water  are
given below. Results for  other  water types
and study details are found in "USEPA Meth-
od Study 7, Analyses for Trace Methods in
Water by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direct  Aspiration)  and  Colorimetry",  Na-
tional Technical Information Service, 5285
Port  Royal  Road,  Springfield,  VA  22161,
Order No. PB86-208709/AS, Winter, J.A.  and
Britton, P.W., June 1986.
  For a concentration range of 74-407 |ig/L
X=0.976(CH3.94
S=0.131(X)+4.26
SR=0.052(X)+3.01
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ugvL
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation,  ug/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, jug/L

               Method 220.1

  For Copper, Method 220.1 (Atomic Absorp-
tion,  Direct Aspiration) replace the Preci-
sion and  Accuracy  Section with the  fol-
lowing:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted  by  the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic  con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added  to reagent water and a
natural water or effluent of the analyst's
choice.  The digestion  procedure was  not
specified.  Results for the reagent water  are
given below. Results for  other  water types
and study details are found in "USEPA Meth-
od Study 7, Analyses for Trace Methods in
Water by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direct  Aspiration)  and  Colorimetry",  Na-
tional Technical Information Service, 5285
Port  Royal  Road,  Springfield,  VA  22161,
Order No. PB86-208709/AS, Winter, J.A.  and
Britton, P.W., June, 1986.
  For concentration range 60-332 ug/L
X=0.963(C)+3.49
S=0.047(X)+12.3
SR=0.042(X)+4.60
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ug/L
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, jig/
  L
SR=Sing-le-analyst Standard Deviation, ug/L

               Method 236.1
  For Iron, Method 236.1 (Atomic Absorption,
Direct Aspiration) replace the Precision and
Accuracy Section with the following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring' Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati    (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing- various  levels of this
element were added  to reagent water and a
natural water  or effluent of the analyst's
choice.  The digestion procedure was not
specified. Results for the reagent water are
given below. Results for other water types
and study details are found in "USEPA Meth-
od Study 7, Analyses for Trade Methods  in
Water by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direct  Aspiration)  and Colorimetry", Na-
tional Technical Information Service, 5285
Port  Royal  Road,  Springfield,  VA  22161,
Order No. PB86-208709/AS,  Winter, J.A. and
Britton, P.W., June, 1986.
  For concentration range 350-840 ug/L
X=0.999(C)-2.21
S=0.022(X)+41.0
SR=0.019(X)+21.2
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ug/L
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-Laboratory  Standard Deviation, ug/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, ug/L

               Method 239.1
  For Lead,  Method  239.1  (Atomic Absorp-
tion,  Direct Aspiration)  replace  Precision
and Accuracy Section with the following:

           Precision and Accuracy
  An  interlaboratory study on metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati    (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added  to reagent water and a
natural water  or effluent of the analyst's
choice.  The digestion procedure was not
specified. Results for the reagent water are
given below. Results for other water  types
and study details are found in "USEPA Meth-
od Study 7 Analyses for  Trace  Methods  in
Water by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direct  Aspiration)  and Colorimetry"; Na-
tional Technical Information Service, 5285
Port  Royal  Road,  Springfield,  VA  22161,
Order No. PB86-208709/AS,  Winter, J.A. and
Britton, P.W., June, 1986.
                                         333

-------
Pt.  136, App. D
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  For concentration range of 84-367 (ig/L
X=0.961(C)+13.8
S=0.028(C)+33.9
SR=0.011(X)+16.1
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ng/L
X=Mean Recovery, ng/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, \igl
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, jig/L

               Method 243.1

  For Manganese, Method 243.1 (Atomic Ab-
sorption,  Direct Aspiration) replace Preci-
sion and  Accuracy  Section with the fol-
lowing':

           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing various  levels of this
element were added  to reagent water  and a
natural water or  effluent of the analyst's
choice.  The  digestion  procedure was not
specified.  Results for the reagent water are
given below. Results for other  water types
and study details are found in "USEPA Meth-
od Study  7, Analyses for Trace Methods  in
Water by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direct Aspiration)  and Colorimetry", Na-
tional Technical Information Service, 5285
Port  Royal  Road,  Springfield, VA  22161,
Order No. PB86-208709/AS,  Winter, J.A. and
Britton, P.W., June, 1988.
  For concentration range 84--169 ug/L
X=0.987(C)-1.27
S=0.042(X)+8.95
SR=0.023(X)+4.90
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ng/L
X=Mean Recovery, |o.g/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, iigJ
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, (ig/L

               Method 289.1

  For  Zinc,  Method  289.1  (Atomic  Absorp-
tion,  Direct  Aspiration) replace the Preci-
sion and  Accuracy  Section with the fol-
lowing:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems  Laboratory-
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing various  levels of this
element were added  to reagent  water  and a
natural water or  effluent of the analyst's
choice.  The  digestion  procedure was not
specified. Results for the  reagent water are
given below. Results for  other water types
and study details are found in "USEPA Meth-
od Study 7, Analyses for  Trace Methods  in
Water  by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Direct  Aspiration)  and  Colorimetry",  Na-
tional  Technical Information Service,  5285
Port Royal  Road,  Springfield,  VA 22161.
Order No. PB86-208709/AS, Winter, J. A. and
Britton, P. W., June, 1986.
For concentration range 56-310 (ig/L
X=0.999(C)+0.033
S=0.078(X)+10.8
SR=0.049(X)+1.10
where:
  C=True Value for the Concentration, jig/L
  X=Mean Recovery, |ig/L
  S=Multi-laboratory  Standard  Deviation,
   Hg/L
  SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, ug/
   L

               Method 202.2

  For Aluminum, Method 202.2 (Atomic Ab-
sorption, Furnace  Technique) replace  the
Precision and Accuracy Section statement
with the following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory study on metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory-
Cincinnati    (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic  con-
centrates containing various  levels of  this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three  effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are found  in "EPA  Method Study 31,
Trace Metals by  Atomic Absorption (Fur-
nace Techniques), "National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161, Order No. PB 86-121
704/AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P.,
January 1986.
For a concentration range of 0.46-125 (ig/L
X=1.1579(C)-0.121
S=0.4286(X)-0.124
SR=0.2908(X)-0.082
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ng/L
X=Mean Recovery, ng/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, \igl
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, ug/L

               Method 204.2

  For Antimony, Method  204.2 (Atomic Ab-
sorption, Furnace  Technique) replace  the
Precision and Accuracy Section statement
with the following:
                                         334

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                          Pt. 136, App. D
           Precision and Accuracy

  An  Intel-laboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted  by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring' Systems  Laboratory-
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water, drinking water and three effluents
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3  in  this  manual as
modified by this method. Results for the rea-
gent water are given below. Results for other
water types and study details are found in
"EPA Method  Study 31, Trace  Metals by
Atomic Absorption  (Furnace Techniques),"
National Technical Information Service, 5285
Port  Royal  Road,  Springfield,  VA  22161,
Order No.  PB 86-121 704/AS, by Copeland, F.R.
and Maney, J.P., January 1986.
For a concentration range of 10.50-240 ug/L
X=0.7219(C)-0.986
S=0.3732(X)+0.854
SR=0.1874(X)-0.461
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ug/L
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, ug/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, ug/L

               Method 206.2

  For Arsenic, Method 206.2  (Atomic Absorp-
tion,  Furnace Technique) add the following
to the existing Precision and Accuracy state-
ment:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory-
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing1 various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water, drinking water and  three effluents.
Results for  the  reagent water are  given
below. Results for other water types and
study details are  found in "EPA Method
Study 31,  Trace Metals  by  Atomic Absorp-
tion (Furnace Techniques)," National Tech-
nical  Information  Service, 5285  Port Royal
Road, Springfield,  VA 22161, Order No. PB 86-
121 704/AS,  by  Copeland, F.R. and  Maney,
J.P., January 1986.
For a concentration range of 9.78-237 \igfL
X=0.9652(C)+2.112
S=0.1411(X)+1.873
SR=0.0464(X)+2.109
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ug/L
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multl-laboratory Standard Deviation, ug/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, ug/L

               Method 208.2

  For Barium, Method 208.2 (Atomic Absorp-
tion, Furnace Technique) add the following
to the existing Precision and Accuracy infor-
mation:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are  found in "EPA  Method Study 31,
Trace Metals by Atomic  Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical  Infor-
mation Service,   5285  Port  Royal   Road,
Springfield, VA 22161, Order No.  PB  86-121
704/AS, by Copeland, F.R.  and Maney,  J.P.,
January 1986.
For a concentration range of 56.50-437 ug/L
X=0.8268(C)+59.459
S=0.2466(X)+6.436
SR=0.1393(X)-0.428
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ug/L
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, ug/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, ug/L

               Method 210.2

  For Beryllium,  Method 210.2 (Atomic  Ab-
sorption, Furnace Technique) replace the ex-
isting  Precision  and Accuracy statement
with the following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory study on  metal  anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring- Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic    con-
centrates  containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual.  Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are  found in "EPA  Method  Study 31,
Trace Metals by Atomic  Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield,  VA 22161, Order No.  PB 86-121
704/AS, by Copeland, F.R.  and Maney, J.P.,
January 1986.
                                         335

-------
Pt. 136, App. D
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
For a concentration range of 0.45-11.
X=1.0682(C)- 0.158
S=0.2167(X)+0.090
SR=0.1096(X)+0.061
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, |ig/L
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, \ig/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, ug/L

               Method 213.2

  For Cadmium,  Method  213.2  (Atomic Ab-
sorption,  Furnace Technique)  add the fol-
lowing to the existing Precision and Accu-
racy information:

           Precision and Accuracy
  An  interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this  method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring System Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing various levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water, drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults  for the  reagent  water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails  are  found  in "EPA  Method Study 31,
Trace Metals by  Atomic  Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161, Order No.  PB 86-121
704/AS, by Copeland,  F.R.  and  Maney,  J.P.,
January 1986.
For a concentration range of 0.43-12.5 ng/L
  X=0.9826(C)+0.171
S=0.2300(X)+0.045
SR=0.1031(X)+0.116
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, (ig/L
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, \agl
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Devision, |ig/L

               Method 218.2

  For Chromium, Method 218.2 (Atomic Ab-
sorption,  Furnace Technique)  add the fol-
lowing to  the existing Precision and Accu-
racy Section:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems  Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing various levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water, drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are found  in "EPA Method  Study 31,
Trace  Metals  by Atomic Absorption (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield,  VA  22161,  Order No.  PB 86-121
704/AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P.,
January 1986.
For a concentration range of 9.87-246 ^g/L
X=0.9120(C)+0.234
S=0.1684(X)+0.852
SR=0.1469(X)+0.315
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ug/L
X=Mean Recovery, ug/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, jig/
  L
SR= Single-analyst Standard Devision, |
               Method 219.2

  For Cobalt, Method 219.2 (Atomic Absorp-
tion, Furnace Technique), replace the Preci-
sion and Accuracy Section statement with
the following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by  the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory —
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three  effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual.  Re-
sults for the reagent water are given  below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are found  in "EPA  Method Study 31,
Trace  Metals  by  Atomic  Absorption (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161 Order No. PB 86-121  704/
AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P., Jan-
uary 1986.
For a concentration range of 21.10-461 (ig/L
X=0.8875(C)+0.859
S=0.2481(X)- 2.541
SR=0.0969(X)+0.134
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, H-S/L
X=Mean Recovery, ng/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard  Deviation, jig/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard  Deviation,  jig/
  L

               Method 220.2

  For Copper, Method 220.2 (Atomic Absorp-
tion, Furnace Technique) replace the Preci-
sion and Accuracy Section statement with
the following:
                                         336

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                          Pt. 136, App. D
           Precision and Accuracy
  An interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted  by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water, drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by  the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results for  other water types and study de-
tails  are  found in "EPA  Method Study 31,
Trace Metals by  Atomic  Absorption (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal   Road,
Springfield, VA 22161 Order No. PB 86-121 7047
AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P., Jan-
uary 1986.
For a concentration range of 0.30-245 ng/L
X=0.9253(C)+0.010
S=0.2735(X)- 0.058
SR=0.2197(X)-0.050
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, \igfLi
X=Mean Recovery, jig/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard  Deviation, ng/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation,  |ig/
  L

               Method 236.2

  For Iron, Method 236.2 (Atomic Absorption,
Furnace  Technique)  replace  the Precision
and  Accuracy  Section statement with the
following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water, drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3  in this manual. Re-
sults  for the reagent water  are given below.
Results for  other water types  and study de-
tails  are  found in  "EPA  Method Study 31,
Trace  Metals by  Atomic Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,   5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield,  VA 22161 Order No. PB 86-121 704/
AS, by Copeland,  F.R. and Maney, J.P., Jan-
uary 1986.
For a concentration range of 0.37-455 |ig/L
X=1.4494(C)- 0.229
S=0.3611(X)-0.079
SR=0.3715(X)-0.161
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration,
X=Mean Recovery, (ig/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, ng/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation,  (ig/
  L

               Method 239.2

  For Lead,  Method  239.2 (Atomic  Absorp-
tion, Furnace Technique) add the following
to the existing Precisions and Accuracy Sec-
tion:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method  was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing  various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion  procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent  water are given below.
Results for other water types  and study de-
tails are  found  in "EPA  Method Study 31,
Trace Metals by Atomic  Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service, 5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161 Order No. PB 86-121 704/
AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P., Jan-
uary 1986.
For a concentration range of 10.40-254 (ig/L
X=0.9430(C)-0.504
S=0.2224(X)+0.507
SR=0,1931(X)-0.378
where:
C=True  Value for the Concentration, tig/ii
X=Mean Recovery, |ig/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, tig/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation,  (ig/
  L

               Method 243.2

  For Manganese, Method 243.2 (Atomic Ab-
sorption,  Furnace Technique) replace the
Precision  and Accuracy Section statement
with the following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory  study on metal  anal-
yses by this  method  was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati  (EMSL—CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates  containing  various levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion  procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results  for other water types  and study de-
tails are found in "EPA  Method  Study 31,
                                         337

-------
Pt.  136, App. D
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Trace  Metals by Atomic Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161. Order No.  PB 86-121
704/AS, by Copeland,  F.R. and Maney, J.P.,
January 1986.
For a concentration range of 0.42-666 jig/L
X=1.0480(C)-H.404
S=0.2001(X)-H.042
SR=0.1333(X)+0.680
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ng/L
X=Mean Recovery, ng/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, ]igl
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, ng/L

               Method 249.2
  For Nickel, Method 249.2  (Atomic Absorp-
tion, Furnace Technique) replace the Preci-
sion and Accuracy Section statement with
the following:

           Precision and Accuracy
  An interlaboratory study on  metal  anal-
yses by this method was conducted by  the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL—CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing- various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three effluents.
These samples were digested by  the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual.  Re-
sults for the reagent water  are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are found in "EPA Method Study 31,
Trace  Metals by Atomic Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161. Order No.  PB 86-121
704/AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P.,
January 1986.
For a concentration range of 26.20-482 |ig/L
X=0.8812(C)+2.426
S=0.2475(X)+1.896
SR=0.1935(X)+1.315
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, p.g/L
X=Mean Recovery, ng/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard  Deviation, ng/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, jig/L

               Method 270.2
  For  Selenium,  Method 270.2 (Atomic  Ab-
sorption,  Furnace Technique) add the  fol-
lowing to the existing Precision and Accu-
racy Section:

           Precision and Accuracy
  An interlaboratory study on  metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL—CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water, drinking water  and three effluents.
Results  for the  reagent  water are  given
below. Results for  other  water types and
study  details are  found in  "EPA Method
Study 31, Trace Metals by Atomic Absorp-
tion (Furnace Techniques)," National  Tech-
nical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal
Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Order No. PB 86-
121 704/AS, by Copeland, F.R.  and Maney,
J.P., January 1986.
For a concentration range of 10.00-246 ng/L
X=0.9564(C)+0.476
S=0.1584(X)+0.878
SR=0.0772(X)+0.547
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, M.g/L
X=Mean Recovery, |ig/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard  Deviation, |ig/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, |j.g/L

               Method 272.2

  For Silver, Method 272.2 (Atomic Absorp-
tion,  Furnace Technique) add the following
to the existing Precision and  Accuracy Sec-
tion:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An  interlaboratory study on  metal  anal-
yses by this  method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory—
Cincinnati   (EMSL—CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water, drinking water  and three effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure,  4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails  are found  in  "EPA  Method  Study 31,
Trace Metals by Atomic  Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical  Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal   Road,
Springfield, VA 22161.  Order  No.  PB  86-121
704/AS, by  Copeland, F.R.  and Maney, J.P.,
January  1986.
For a concentration range of 0.45-56.5 ng/L
X=0.9470(C)+0.181
S=0.1805(X)+0.153
SR=0.1417(X)+0.039
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, |ig/L
X=Mean Recovery, jig/L
S=Multi-laboratory  Standard  Deviation, \ig/
  L
SR=Single-analyst  Standard Deviation,
                                          338

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                  Pt. 140
               Method 279.2
  For Thalliu, Method 279.2 (Atomic Absorp-
tion, Furnace Technique) replace the Preci-
sion and Accuracy Section statement with
the following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory study on metal anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental Monitoring- Systems Laboratory-
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three  effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are found in "EPA Method Study  31,
Trace  Metals by  Atomic Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161 Order No. PB 86-121 704/
AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P., Jan-
uary 1986.
For a concentration range of 10.00-252 (tg/L.
X=0.8781(C)-0.715
S=0.1112(X)-M).669
SR=0.1005(X)+0.241
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, ng/L
X=Mean Recovery, ng/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard  Deviation, |ig/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation, (ig/L

               Method 286.2
  For Vanadium, Method 286.2 (Atomic Ab-
sorption,  Furnace Technique) replace the
Precision and Accuracy Section statement
with the following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory study on metal  anal-
yses by this method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental  Monitoring Systems Laboratory-
Cincinnati   (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing various  levels of this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and  three  effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in this manual. Re-
sults for the reagent water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are found  in "EPA  Method Study  31,
Trace Metals by Atomic Absorption  (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161 Order No. PB 86-121 704/
AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P., Jan-
uary 1986.
For a concentration range of 1.36-982 ng/L.
X=0.8486(C)-K).252
S=0.3323(X)-0.428
SR=0.1195(X)- 0.121
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, |ig/L
X=Mean Recovery, (ig/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, ng/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation,   (ig/
  L

               Method 289.2

  For Zinc, Method 289.2  (Atomic Absorp-
tion, Furnace Technique) replace the Preci-
sion and Accuracy Section statement with
the following:

           Precision and Accuracy

  An interlaboratory study on metal anal-
yses by this  method was conducted by the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB) of the Envi-
ronmental  Monitoring Systems Laboratory-
Cincinnati    (EMSL-CI).   Synthetic   con-
centrates containing various levels  of  this
element were added to reagent water, surface
water,  drinking water and three  effluents.
These samples were digested by the total di-
gestion procedure, 4.1.3 in  this manual. Re-
sults for the  reagent water are given below.
Results for other water types and study de-
tails are found  in "EPA Method Study 31,
Trace Metals by Atomic  Absorption (Fur-
nace Techniques)," National Technical Infor-
mation  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Road,
Springfield, VA 22161 Order  No. PB 86-121 704/
AS, by Copeland, F.R. and Maney, J.P., Jan-
uary 1986.
For a concentration range of 0.51-189 ng/L.
X=1.6710(C)+1.485
S=0.6740(X)-0.342
SR=0.3895(X)-0.384
where:
C=True Value for the Concentration, |ig/L
X=Mean Recovery, (tg/L
S=Multi-laboratory Standard Deviation, ng/
  L
SR=Single-analyst Standard Deviation,  jig/
  L

[55 FR 33442, Aug. 15,  1990]


  PART 140—MARINE SANITATION
         DEVICE STANDARD

Sec.
140.1 Definitions.
140.2 Scope of standard.
140.3 Standard.
140.4 Complete prohibition.
140.5 Analytical procedures.

  AUTHORITY: 33 U.S.C. 1322, as amended.

  SOURCE:  41  FR 4453, Jan. 29,  1976, unless
otherwise noted.
                                         339

-------
§140.1
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 140.1  Definitions.
  For the  purpose of these standards
the following definitions shall apply:
  (a) Sewage means human body wastes
and the wastes from toilets and other
receptacles intended to receive  or re-
tain body wastes;
  (b) Discharge includes, but is not lim-
ited to, any spilling, leaking, pumping,
pouring, emitting, emptying, or dump-
ing;
  (c) Marine  sanitation device includes
any equipment for installation onboard
a vessel and which is  designed  to re-
ceive, retain, treat, or discharge sew-
age and any process to treat such sew-
age;
  (d)  Vessel includes every description
of watercraft or other artificial con-
trivance used, or capable of being used,
as a means of transportation on waters
of the United States;
  (e) New vessel refers  to any vessel on
which construction was initiated on or
after January 30, 1975;
  (f) Existing vessel refers to any vessel
on which construction was initiated be-
fore January 30, 1975;
  (g)  Fecal coliform  bacteria are those
organisms  associated  with  the  intes-
tines of warm-blooded animals that are
commonly  used  to  indicate the pres-
ence of  fecal material and the potential
presence of organisms capable of caus-
ing human disease.

§ 140.2  Scope of standard.
  The standard adopted herein  applies
only to  vessels on which a  marine sani-
tation device has been installed. The
standard does not require  the installa-
tion of  a marine sanitation device  on
any vessel  that is not  so equipped. The
standard applies to vessels owned and
operated by  the United States unless
the Secretary of Defense finds that
compliance would not be in the inter-
est of national security.

§140.3  Standard.
  (a) (1) In  freshwater lakes, freshwater
reservoirs  or  other  freshwater  im-
poundments whose inlets or outlets are
such as to  prevent the ingress or egress
by vessel traffic subject to this  regula-
tion, or in  rivers not capable of naviga-
tion by interstate vessel traffic  subject
to  this regulation,  marine  sanitation
devices  certified by  the  U.S.  Coast
Guard (see 33 CFR part 159, published
in 40 FR 4622,  January  30, 1975), in-
stalled on all vessels shall be designed
and operated to prevent the overboard
discharge of sewage, treated or  un-
treated,  or of any waste  derived from
sewage. This shall not be construed to
prohibit  the  carriage of Coast Guard-
certified flow-through  treatment  de-
vices which have been secured so as to
prevent such  discharges.
  (2) In all other waters,  Coast Guard-
certified marine sanitation devices in-
stalled on all vessels shall be designed
and operated to either retain, dispose
of, or discharge sewage.  If the device
has a discharge, subject  to  paragraph
(d) of this section,  the effluent shall
not  have a  fecal  coliform  bacterial
count of greater than 1,000 per 100 mil-
liliters nor visible floating solids.  Wa-
ters where a  Coast Guard-certified  ma-
rine  sanitation  device  permitting  dis-
charge is allowed include coastal  wa-
ters and  estuaries, the Great Lakes and
inter-connected waterways, fresh-water
lakes  and  impoundments  accessible
through  locks, and  other flowing  wa-
ters  that are navigable interstate by
vessels subject to this regulation.
  (b) This standard shall become effec-
tive on January 30, 1977 for new vessels
and  on  January 30,  1980  for existing
vessels (or, in the case of vessels owned
and operated by the Department  of De-
fense, two years and five years, for  new
and existing vessels, respectively, after
promulgation of implementing regula-
tions by  the Secretary of Defense under
section 312(d) of the Act).
  (c) Any vessel which is equipped as of
the date of promulgation of this regu-
lation with  a  Coast  Guard-certified
flow-through marine sanitation device
meeting  the requirements of paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, shall not be re-
quired to comply with the  provisions
designed to prevent the overboard  dis-
charge of sewage, treated or untreated,
in paragraph (a)(l) of this section, for
the operable life of that device.
  (d)  After January 30,  1980, subject to
paragraphs (e)  and (f)  of this section,
marine  sanitation  devices  on all  ves-
sels on waters that are not subject  to a
prohibition of the overboard discharge
of sewage,  treated or  untreated, as
specified in paragraph (a)(l) of this  sec-
tion,  shall be designed and operated to
                                     340

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §140.4
either retain, dispose of, or discharge
sewage, and shall be certified by the
U.S. Coast  Guard. If the device has a
discharge, the effluent shall not have a
fecal coliform bacterial count of great-
er than 200  per 100 milliliters,  nor sus-
pended solids greater than 150 mg/1.
  (e) Any existing vessel on waters not
subject to  a prohibition of the  over-
board discharge of sewage in paragraph
(a)(l)  of  this  section,  and which is
equipped with a certified device on or
before January 30, 1978, shall not be re-
quired to comply with paragraph (d) of
this section, for the operable life of
that device.
  (f) Any new vessel on waters  not sub-
ject to the prohibition of the overboard
discharge of sewage  in paragraph (a)(l)
of this section, and on which construc-
tion is  initiated  before January  31,
1980, which  is equipped with a marine
sanitation  device before January  31,
1980, certified under paragraph (a)(2) of
this section, shall not be required to
comply with paragraph (d) of this sec-
tion,  for the operable life of  that de-
vice.
  (g)  The   degrees  of treatment de-
scribed in paragraphs (a) and (d) of this
section are  "appropriate standards" for
purposes of Coast Guard and Depart-
ment of Defense certification pursuant
to section 312(g)(2) of the Act.

[41 PR  4453, Jan. 29, 1976, as amended at 60
FR 33932, June 29, 1995]

§ 140.4 Complete prohibition.
  (a) Prohibition pursuant to CWA sec-
tion 312(f)(3): a  State may  completely
prohibit  the discharge from  all vessels
of any sewage,  whether treated or not,
into some or all of the waters within
such State by making a written appli-
cation to the Administrator, Environ-
mental Protection Agency, and  by re-
ceiving the Administrator's  affirma-
tive determination pursuant to section
312(f)(3) of the Act. Upon receipt of an
application  under  section  312(f)(3) of
the Act, the Administrator will deter-
mine within 90 days  whether adequate
facilities for the safe and sanitary re-
moval and  treatment of sewage from
all vessels using such waters  are  rea-
sonably  available.  Applications made
by States pursuant  to section 312(f)(3)
of the Act shall include:
  (1) A certification that the protection
and  enhancement  of the  waters de-
scribed in the petition require greater
environmental protection than the ap-
plicable Federal standard;
  (2) A map showing the  location of
commercial and recreational pump-out
facilities;
  (3) A description of the  location of
pump-out facilities within  waters des-
ignated for no discharge;
  (4) The general schedule of operating
hours of the pump-out facilities;
  (5) The draught requirements on ves-
sels  that may be excluded because of
insufficient water  depth  adjacent  to
the facility;
  (6) Information indicating that treat-
ment of wastes from such pump-out fa-
cilities is in conformance with Federal
law; and
  (7) Information on  vessel population
and vessel usage of the subject waters.
  (b) Prohibition pursuant to CWA sec-
tion 312(f)(4)(A): a  State may make a
written application  to  the  Adminis-
trator,   Environmental   Protection
Agency,  under  section  312(f)(4)(A)  of
the Act, for the issuance  of a regula-
tion completely prohibiting discharge
from a vessel of any sewage, whether
treated or  not,  into particular waters
of the United States or specified por-
tions thereof, which waters are located
within the  boundaries of such  State.
Such application shall  specify  with
particularly  the waters,  or portions
thereof, for which a complete prohibi-
tion is desired.  The  application  shall
include identification  of  water rec-
reational  areas, drinking water in-
takes,  aquatic sanctuaries,  identifiable
fish-spawning and  nursery areas, and
areas of intensive boating activities. If,
on the basis of the State's application
and any other information available to
him, the  Administrator  is unable  to
make a finding  that  the waters listed
in the application  require  a  complete
prohibition of any discharge in the wa-
ters or portions  thereof covered by the
application, he shall  state  the reasons
why he cannot  make such a finding,
and  shall deny the application.  If the
Administrator  makes a finding that
the waters listed in the application re-
quire a  complete prohibition of any
discharge in all  or any part of the wa-
ters or portions  thereof covered by the
                                     341

-------
§140.5
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
State's application,  he shall publish
notice of such findings together with a
notice of proposed  rule  making,  and
then shall proceed in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553.  If the Administrator's find-
ing is that  applicable water quality
standards require a complete prohibi-
tion covering a more restricted or more
expanded area than that applied for by
the State,  he shall state the reasons
why his finding  differs in scope from
that requested in the State's applica-
tion.
  (1) For the following  waters the  dis-
charge  from a  vessel  of any sewage
(whether treated or not) is completely
prohibited  pursuant  to CWA section
312(f)(4)(A):
  (i) Boundary Waters Canoe Area,  for-
merly designated as the Superior, Lit-
tle Indian Sioux, and Caribou Roadless
Areas, in the Superior National Forest,
Minnesota,  as  described  in  16  U.S.C.
577-577dl.
  (ii)  Waters of  the State of Florida
within the  boundaries  of the Florida
Keys National Marine Sanctuary as de-
lineated on a map of the  Sanctuary at
http://www.fknms.nos.noaa.gov/.
  (c)(l) Prohibition pursuant to CWA  sec-
tion 312(f)(4)(B):  A  State may  make
written application  to  the   Adminis-
trator of the Environmental Protection
Agency under section 312(f)(4)(B)  of the
Act for the issuance of a regulation es-
tablishing a drinking water  intake no
discharge zone which completely pro-
hibits  discharge  from a vessel of  any
sewage, whether  treated or untreated,
into that zone  in particular  waters, or
portions thereof,  within  such  State.
Such application shall:
  (i) Identify and describe exactly  and
in detail the location of the drinking
water supply intake(s) and the commu-
nity served by  the intake(s), including
average   and    maximum   expected
amounts of inflow;
  (ii)  Specify and describe exactly  and
in detail, the waters, or portions there-
of, for which a complete prohibition is
desired, and where  appropriate, aver-
age, maximum and low flows in million
gallons per day  (MGD) or the metric
equivalent;
  (iii)  Include  a  map, either a  USGS
topographic quadrant map or a NOAA
nautical chart,  as applicable, clearly
marking by latitude  and longitude the
waters or portions thereof to be des-
ignated a drinking water intake zone;
and
  (iv) Include a statement of basis jus-
tifying the size of the requested drink-
ing water  intake zone,  for  example,
identifying areas  of intensive boating
activities.
  (2) If the Administrator finds that a
complete  prohibition   is  appropriate
under this paragraph,  he  or she shall
publish notice of such finding together
with a notice  of proposed rulemaking,
and then  shall proceed in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 553. If the  Administra-
tor's finding is that a complete prohibi-
tion covering a more restricted or more
expanded area than that applied for by
the State is appropriate, he or she shall
also include a statement of the reasons
why the finding  differs in scope from
that requested in the  State's  applica-
tion.
  (3) If the Administrator finds that a
complete  prohibition is inappropriate
under this paragraph,  he  or she shall
deny the application and state the rea-
sons for such denial.
  (4) For the following  waters the dis-
charge from a vessel  of   any sewage,
whether treated  or not, is completely
prohibited  pursuant to CWA section
312(f)(4)(B):
  (i) Two portions of the Hudson River
in New York State, the  first is bounded
by an east-west line through  the most
northern  confluence  of  the  Mohawk
River which will be designated by the
Troy-Waterford  Bridge (126th  Street
Bridge) on the south and Lock 2 on the
north, and the  second  of which  is
bounded on the  north by  the  southern
end of Houghtaling Island and on the
south by a line between the Village of
Roseton on the western shore and Low
Point on the eastern shore in the vicin-
ity of Chelsea,  as described in Items 2
and 3 of 6 NYCRR Part 858.4.
  (ii) [Reserved]

[41 FR 4453, Jan. 29, 1976,  as  amended at 42
FR 43837, Aug. 31, 1977; 60  FR 63945, Dec. 13,
1995; 63 FR 1320, Jan. 8, 1998; 67 FR 35743, May
21, 2002]

§ 140.5 Analytical procedures.
  In determining  the composition and
quality of effluent discharge from ma-
rine sanitation devices, the procedures
                                     342

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                                       Pt. 141
contained in 40 CFR part 136,  "Guide-
lines Establishing Test  Procedures for
the  Analysis  of Pollutants," or subse-
quent revisions or  amendments there-
to, shall be employed.

   PART 141—NATIONAL PRIMARY
  DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS
Sec.
141.1
141.2
141.3
141.4
141.5
141.6
           Subpart A—General
Applicability.
Definitions.
Coverage.
Variances and exemptions.
Siting requirements.
Effective dates.
 Subpart B—Maximum Contaminant Levels

141.11  Maximum contaminant levels for in-
    organic chemicals.
141.12  Maximum   contaminant  levels  for
    total trihalomethanes.
141.13  Maximum contaminant levels for tur-
    bidity.

  Subpart C—Monitoring and Analytical
              Requirements

141.21  Coliform sampling.
141.22  Turbidity sampling and analytical re-
    quirements.
141.23  Inorganic chemical sampling and ana-
    lytical requirements.
141.24  Organic chemicals, sampling and ana-
    lytical requirements.
141.25  Analytical methods for radioactivity.
141.26  Monitoring frequency and compliance
    requirements for radionuclides in com-
    munity water systems
141.27  Alternate analytical techniques.
141.28  Certified laboratories.
141.29  Monitoring   of consecutive  public
    water systems.
141.30  Total trihalomethanes sampling, ana-
    lytical and other requirements.

 Subpart D—Reporting and Recordkeeping

141.31  Reporting requirements.
141.32  Public notification.
141.33  Record maintenance.
141.34  [Reserved]
141.35  Reporting  of unregulated contami-
    nant monitoring results.

Subpart  E—Special Regulations, Including
    Monitoring Regulations and Prohibition
    on Lead Use

141.40  Monitoring  requirements  for  unregu-
    lated contaminants.
141.41  Special monitoring for sodium.
141.42  Special  monitoring for  corrosivity
   characteristics.
141.43  Prohibition on use  of lead pipes, sol-
   der, and flux.

Subpart  f—Maximum Contaminant  Level
    Goals  and  Maximum Residual  Dis-
    infectant Level Goals

141.50  Maximum  contaminant  level  goals
   for organic contaminants.
141.51  Maximum  contaminant  level  goals
   for inorganic contaminants.
141.52  Maximum  contaminant  level  goals
   for microbiological contaminants.
141.53  Maximum  contaminant  level  goals
   for disinfection byproducts.
141.54  Maximum  residual  disinfectant level
   goals for disinfectants.
141.55  Maximum  contaminant  level  goals
   for radionuclides.

Subpart  G—National  Primary  Drinking
    Water  Regulations:   Maximum  Con-
    taminant Levels and  Maximum Resid-
    ual Disinfectant Levels

141.60  Effective dates.
141.61  Maximum  contaminant levels for or-
   ganic contaminants.
141.62  Maximum  contaminant levels for in-
   organic contaminants.
141.63  Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)
   for microbiological contaminants.
141.64  Maximum contaminant levels for dis-
   infection byproducts.
141.65  Maximum  residual  disinfectant lev-
   els.
141.66  Maximum  contaminant  levels  for
   radionuclides.

   Subpart H—Filtration and Disinfection

141.70  General requirements.
141.71  Criteria for avoiding filtration.
141.72  Disinfection.
141.73  Filtration.
141.74  Analytical  and monitoring require-
   ments.
141.75  Reporting and recordkeeping require-
   ments.
141.76  Recycle provisions.

  Subpart I—Control of Lead and Copper

141.80  General requirements.
141.81  Applicability  of corrosion  control
   treatment  steps  to small, medium-size
   and large water systems.
141.82  Description  of  corrosion   control
   treatment requirements.
141.83  Source   water  treatment  require-
   ments.
141.84  Lead  service line  replacement  re-
   quirements.
141.85  Public education and supplemental
   monitoring requirements.
                                        343
      203-160  D-12

-------
Pt. 141
                       40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
141.86 Monitoring requirements for lead and
   copper in tap water.
141.87 Monitoring  requirements for water
   quality parameters.
141.88 Monitoring requirements for lead and
   copper in source water.
141.89 Analytical methods.
141.90 Reporting1 requirements.
141.91 Recordkeeping requirements.

    Subpart J—Use of Non-Centralized
            Treatment Devices

141.100 Criteria and procedures for public
   water  systems using point-of-entry de-
   vices.
141.101 Use  of bottled water.

     Subpart K—Treatment Techniques
141.110 General requirements.
141.111 Treatment  techniques
   amide and epichlorohydrin.
for   acryl-
Subpart L—Disinfectant Residuals, Disinfec-
    tion  Byproducts, and  Disinfection  By-
    product Precursors

141.130 General requirements.
141.131 Analytical requirements.
141.132 Monitoring requirements.
141.133 Compliance requirements.
141.134 Reporting  and  recordkeeping  re-
    quirements.
141.135 Treatment technique for  control of
    disinfection byproduct (DBF) precursors.

         Subparts  M-N [Reserved]

Subpart O—Consumer Confidence Reports

141.151 Purpose  and applicability of  this
    subpart.
141.152 Effective dates.
141.153 Content of the reports.
141.154 Required additional health informa-
    tion.
141.155 Report delivery and recordkeeping.
APPENDIX A TO SUBPART O OF PART 141—REG-
    ULATED CONTAMINANTS

Subpart  P—Enhanced Filtration and  Dis-
    infection—Systems Serving  10,000 or
    More People

141.170 General requirements.
141.171 Criteria for avoiding filtration.
141.172 Disinfection      profiling      and
    benchmarking.
141.173 Filtration.
141.174 Filtration  sampling requirements.
141.175 Reporting  and  recordkeeping  re-
    quirements.
 Subpart Q—Public Notification of Drinking
             Water Violations

141.201  General public notification  require-
   ments.
141.202  Tier 1  Public Notice—Form,  manner,
   and frequency of notice.
141.203  Tier 2 Public Notice—Form,  manner,
   and frequency of notice.
141.204  Tier 3 Public Notice—Form,  manner,
   and frequency of notice.
141.205  Content of the public notice.
141.206  Notice to new billing units or new
   customers.
141.207  Special notice of the availability of
   unregulated contaminant  monitoring re-
   sults.
141.208  Special notice for exceedance of the
   SMCL for fluoride.
141.209  Special    notice    for    nitrate
   exceedances above MCL by non-commu-
   nity water systems (NCWS), where grant-
   ed  permission by the  primacy agency
   under §141.11(d).
141.210  Notice by primacy agency on behalf
   of the public water system.
APPENDIX  A  TO  SUBPART Q  OF  PART  141—
   NPDWR VIOLATIONS  AND SITUATIONS RE-
   QUIRING PUBLIC NOTICE
APPENDIX  B  TO  SUBPART Q  OF  PART  141—
   STANDARD HEALTH  EFFECTS LANGUAGE
   FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
APPENDIX C TO SUBPAHT Q OF  PART 141—LIST
   OF  ACRONYMS USED  IN PUBLIC NOTIFICA-
   TION REGULATION

         Subparts R-S [Reserved]

Subpart  T—Enhanced  Filtration  and Dis-
    infection—Systems  Serving Fewer Than
    10,000 People

          GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

141.500  General requirements.
141.501  Who  is subject  to the requirements
   of subpart T?
141.502  When must my  system comply with
   these requirements?
141.503  What does subpart T require?

        FINISHED WATER RESERVOIRS

141.510  Is my system subject to the new fin-
   ished water reservoir requirements?
141.511  What  is  required  of new  finished
   water reservoirs?

     ADDITIONAL WATERSHED CONTROL
  REQUIREMENTS FOR UNFILTERED SYSTEMS

141.520  Is my system subject to the updated
   watershed control requirements?
141.521  What updated watershed control  re-
   quirements must my unfiltered system
   implement to  continue  to avoid  filtra-
   tion?
                                         344

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                  §141.2
141.522  How   does   the   State  determine
    whether my system's watershed control
    requirements are adequate?

           DISINFECTION PROFILE

141.530  What  is a  disinfection profile  and
    who must develop one?
141.531  What  criteria must a State use to
    determine  that a profile is unnecessary?
141.532  How does my system develop a dis-
    infection profile and when must it begin?
141.533  What  data must  my system collect
    to calculate a disinfection profile?
141.534  How does my system use this data to
    calculate an Inactivation ratio?
141.535  What    if    my    system   uses
    chloramines, ozone,  or chlorine  dioxide
    for primary disinfection?
141.536  My system has developed an inac-
    tivation ratio; what must we do now?

         DISINFECTION BENCHMARK

141.540  Who has to develop a disinfection
    benchmark?
141.541  What are significant changes to dis-
    infection practice?
141.542  What  must  my system  do if we are
    considering a significant change to  dis-
    infection practices?
141.543  How is the disinfection benchmark
    calculated?
141.544  What    if    my    system   uses
    chloramines, ozone,  or chlorine  dioxide
    for primary disinfection?

 COMBINED FILTER EFFLUENT REQUIREMENTS

141.550  Is my  system required to meet sub-
    part T combined filter effluent turbidity
    limits?
141.551  What  strengthened  combined filter
    effluent turbidity limits must my system
    meet?
141.552  My system consists of "alternative
    filtration"  and  is required  to  conduct a
    demonstration—what  is  required of my
    system and how does the State establish
    my turbidity limits?
141.553  My  system  practices   lime  soft-
    ening—is there any special provision re-
    garding my combined filter effluent?

INDIVIDUAL FILTER TURBIDITY REQUIREMENTS

141.560  Is my  system subject  to  individual
    filter turbidity requirements?
141.561  What  happens if my system's  tur-
    bidity monitoring equipment fails?
141.562  My system only has two or fewer fil-
    ters—is there any special  provision re-
    garding individual filter  turbidity moni-
    toring?
141.563  What follow-up action is my system
    required to  take based on  continuous
    turbidity monitoring?
141.564  My  system  practices  lime  soft-
    ening—is there any special provision re-
    garding  my individual  filter  turbidity
    monitoring?

      REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING
              REQUIREMENTS
141.570 What does subpart T require that my
    system report to the State?
141.571 What records does subpart T require
    my system to keep?
  AUTHORITY: 42  U.S.C. 300f, 300g-l, 300g-2,
300g-3, 300g-4,  300g-5,  300g-6, 300;H, 300J-9,
and SOOj-ll.
  SOURCE: 40 FR 59570, Dec. 24, 1975, unless
otherwise noted.
  EDITORIAL NOTE: Nomenclature changes to
part 141 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.
  NOTE: For community water systems serv-
ing 75,000 or more persons, monitoring must
begin 1 year following promulation and the
effective  date of the MCL is 2 years following
promulgation.  For  community  water  sys-
tems  serving 10,000  to 75,000 persons, moni-
toring must begin within 3  years  from the
date of promulgation  and the effective date
of the MCL  is 4 years from  the date of pro-
mulgation. Effective  immediately,  systems
that plan to make significant modifications
to their treatment processes for the purpose
of complying with the TTHM MCL  are re-
quired to seek and obtain State approval of
their  treatment modification  plans.  This
note affects §§141.2, 141.6, 141.12, 141.24 and
141.30. For additional information see 44 FR
68641, Nov. 29, 1979.

         Subpart A—General

§ 141.1  Applicability.
  This part establishes primary  drink-
ing water regulations pursuant to  sec-
tion 1412 of the Public Health Service
Act,  as  amended by the Safe Drinking
Water Act (Pub. L.  93-523); and related
regulations applicable  to public water
systems.

§ 141.2  Definitions.
  As used in this part, the term:
  Act means the Public Health Service
Act, as  amended by the Safe Drinking
Water Act, Public Law 93-523.
  Action level,  is  the concentration  of
lead  or  copper in  water specified  in
§141.80(c)  which determines,  in some
cases, the treatment requirements con-
tained in subpart I of this part that a
water system  is required to complete.
  Best   available  technology   or  BAT
means the best technology, treatment
techniques, or other means which the
Administrator finds, after examination
                                        345

-------
§141.2
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
for efficacy under field conditions and
not solely under laboratory conditions,
are available (taking cost into consid-
eration). For  the purposes of setting
MCLs for synthetic organic chemicals,
any BAT must be at least as effective
as granular activated carbon.
  Coagulation means a process using co-
agulant chemicals and mixing by which
colloidal and  suspended materials  are
destabilized  and  agglomerated  into
floes.
  Community water system means a pub-
lic water system which serves at least
15 service  connections used by  year-
round residents or regularly serves at
least 25 year-round residents.
  Compliance cycle means the nine-year
calendar year cycle during which pub-
lic water systems must monitor. Each
compliance cycle  consists of  three
three-year   compliance  periods.  The
first calendar year cycle begins Janu-
ary 1, 1993  and ends December 31, 2001;
the second begins January 1, 2002 and
ends December 31, 2010; the third begins
January 1, 2011 and ends December  31,
2019.
  Compliance period means a three-year
calendar year period within a compli-
ance cycle.  Each compliance cycle has
three three-year  compliance periods.
Within  the first compliance cycle,  the
first compliance period runs from Jan-
uary 1,  1993 to December 31, 1995;  the
second from January 1, 1996 to Decem-
ber 31, 1998; the third from January 1,
1999 to December 31, 2001.
  Comprehensive performance evaluation
(CPE) is a thorough review and anal-
ysis of a  treatment plant's  perform-
ance-based capabilities and associated
administrative, operation and mainte-
nance  practices.  It  is  conducted  to
identify factors that  may be adversely
impacting   a   plant's   capability   to
achieve compliance and emphasizes ap-
proaches  that  can  be  implemented
without significant  capital improve-
ments. For purpose of compliance with
subparts P and T of this part, the com-
prehensive  performance   evaluation
must consist of at least  the following
components: Assessment of plant per-
formance;  evaluation  of major  unit
processes;      identification     and
prioritization  of  performance limiting
factors; assessment of the applicability
of comprehensive technical assistance;
and preparation of a CPE report.
  Confluent growth means a continuous
bacterial  growth  covering the entire
filtration area of a membrane filter, or
a portion thereof,  in which  bacterial
colonies are not discrete.
  Contaminant  means  any  physical,
chemical, biological,  or  radiological
substance or matter in water.
  Conventional    filtration    treatment
means a series of processes including
coagulation, flocculation,  sedimenta-
tion,  and filtration resulting in sub-
stantial particulate removal.
  Corrosion inhibitor means a substance
capable of reducing the corrosivity of
water  toward  metal plumbing  mate-
rials, especially  lead and copper,  by
forming a protective film on  the inte-
rior surface  of those materials.
  CT or CTcalc is the product of "resid-
ual disinfectant concentration" (C) in
mg/1 determined before or at the first
customer, and the corresponding "dis-
infectant contact time" (T) in minutes,
i.e., "C" x "T". If a public  water system
applies  disinfectants at more  than one
point prior  to the  first  customer, it
must determine  the CT of each  dis-
infectant sequence  before or at  the
first customer to  determine the total
percent inactivation or "total inactiva-
tion ratio." In determining the total in-
activation ratio, the public water sys-
tem  must determine the residual  dis-
infectant concentration  of each  dis-
infection sequence and corresponding
contact  time before  any  subsequent
disinfection    application   point(s).
"CT999"  is the CT value required for 99.9
percent (3-log) inactivation of Giardia
lamblia  cysts. CT99 9 for a variety of dis-
infectants and conditions appear in  ta-
bles 1.1-1.6, 2.1, and 3.1 of §141.741 b)(3).

               CTcalc

               CT999

is the inactivation ratio. The sum of
the inactivation ratios, or total inac-
tivation ratio shown as

             ^ (CTcalc)
                (CT99.9)
is calculated by adding together the in-
activation ratio  for  each disinfection
                                     346

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §141.2
sequence.  A  total  inactivation  ratio
equal to or greater than 1.0 is assumed
to  provide  a  3-log  inactivation  of
Giardia lamblia cysts.
  Diatomaceous earth filtration means a
process resulting in substantial partic-
ulate removal in which  (1) a precoat
cake   of  diatomaceous  earth   filter
media  is  deposited   on  a  support
membrance (septum), and (2)  while the
water is filtered by passing through the
cake  on the septum,  additional  filter
media known as body feed is continu-
ously added to the feed water to main-
tain  the  permeability  of the   filter
cake.
  Direct  filtration  means  a  series  of
processes including coagulation and fil-
tration  but  excluding  sedimentation
resulting in substantial particulate re-
moval.
  Disinfectant means any oxidant, in-
cluding  but  not  limited to  chlorine,
chlorine  dioxide,   chloramines,  and
ozone added to water in any part of the
treatment  or distribution process, that
is intended to kill or inactivate patho-
genic microorganisms.
  Disinfectant contact  time ("T" in CT
calculations) means the  time in min-
utes that it  takes for water to  move
from the point of disinfectant applica-
tion or the previous point of  disinfect-
ant residual  measurement  to a  point
before or at  the point where residual
disinfectant   concentration   ("C")  is
measured. Where only one "C" is meas-
ured, "T" is the time in minutes that it
takes for water to move from  the  point
of disinfectant application to a  point
before or at where residual disinfectant
concentration ("C") is measured. Where
more  than one "C" is measured,  "T" is
(a) for  the first measurement of "C",
the time in minutes that it  takes for
water to move from the first or only
point of disinfectant application to  a
point before  or at the point where the
first "C" is measured and (b) for subse-
quent measurements of "C", the time in
minutes that it  takes for  water  to
move from the  previous  "C"  measure-
ment point  to  the "C"  measurement
point for which  the particular "T" is
being calculated.  Disinfectant contact
time in pipelines must be calculated
based on "plug flow" by dividing the in-
ternal  volume of the pipe by  the  max-
imum  hourly flow rate  through that
pipe. Disinfectant contact time within
mixing basins and  storage  reservoirs
must be determined by tracer studies
or an equivalent demonstration.
  Disinfection  means  a process  which
inactivates  pathogenic  organisms  in
water by chemical oxidants  or equiva-
lent agents.
  Disinfection  profile is a summary of
Giardia lamblia inactivation through
the treatment plant. The procedure for
developing a disinfection profile is con-
tained   in    §141.172    (Disinfection
profiling and benchmarking)  in subpart
P   and §§141.530-141.536  (Disinfection
profile) in subpart T of this part.
  Domestic  or  other non-distribution sys-
tem plumbing problem means a coliform
contamination problem  in  a  public
water system  with more than one serv-
ice connection that is limited  to  the
specific service connection from  which
the   coliform-positive    sample   was
taken.
  Dose equivalent means the product of
the absorbed  dose from ionizing radi-
ation and such factors as account for
differences in biological effectiveness
due to  the  type   of radiation  and its
distribution in the body as specified by
the  International   Commission  on
Radiological Units and  Measurements
(ICRU).
  Effective  corrosion inhibitor residual,
for the purpose of  subpart I of this part
only, means a concentration sufficient
to form a passivating film on the inte-
rior walls of a  pipe.
  Enhanced coagulation means the addi-
tion of sufficient coagulant for im-
proved removal of disinfection byprod-
uct precursors by conventional filtra-
tion treatment.
  Enhanced  softening means the im-
proved removal of disinfection byprod-
uct precursors by precipitative soft-
ening.
  Filter profile is a graphical represen-
tation  of individual filter performance,
based  on  continuous turbidity  meas-
urements   or   total  particle  counts
versus time for an entire  filter run,
from startup  to backwash inclusively,
that includes  an  assessment of filter
performance   while  another filter  is
being backwashed.
  Filtration means  a process for remov-
ing particulate matter from water by
passage through porous media.
                                     347

-------
§141.2
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  First draw sample means a  one-liter
sample  of tap  water, collected in ac-
cordance with §141.86(b)(2),  that  has
been  standing  in plumbing  pipes  at
least  6 hours and is collected without
flushing the tap.
  Flocculation means  a  process  to en-
hance agglomeration or collection of
smaller floe particles into larger, more
easily  settleable  particles  through
gentle stirring by hydraulic or mechan-
ical means.
  GAC10 means granular activated car-
bon filter beds  with an empty-bed con-
tact time of 10 minutes based on aver-
age daily flow  and a carbon reactiva-
tion frequency of every 180 days.
  Ground water  under the direct influence
of surface water  (G-WUDI)  means any
water beneath  the  surface  of  the
ground with significant  occurrence of
insects   or  other   macroorganisms,
algae,  or   large-diameter  pathogens
such    as    Giardia   lamblia    or
Cryptosporidium, or significant and rel-
atively rapid shifts in water character-
istics such  as  turbidity, temperature,
conductivity, or pH which closely cor-
relate to  climatological  or  surface
water conditions.  Direct   influence
must  be  determined  for  individual
sources  in accordance with criteria es-
tablished by the State. The State de-
termination of direct influence may be
based on site-specific measurements of
water quality and/or documentation of
well  construction characteristics and
geology with field evaluation.
  Gross alpha particle activity means the
total  radioactivity due  to  alpha par-
ticle  emission  as inferred from meas-
urements on a dry sample.
  Gross beta particle activity  means the
total  radioactivity due to beta particle
emission as inferred from measure-
ments on a dry sample.
  Haloacetic acids (five)  (HAAS)  mean
the sum of the  concentrations in milli-
grams per liter of the haloacetic acid
compounds   (monochloroacetic  acid,
dichloroacetic   acid,   trichloroacetic
acid,  monobromoacetic acid, and dibro-
moacetic acid), rounded to two signifi-
cant figures after addition.
  Halogen means one of the chemical
elements chlorine, bromine or iodine.
  Initial  compliance period  means  the
first full three-year compliance period
which begins at least 18 months after
promulgation, except for contaminants
listed at §141.61(a) (19)-(21), (c) (19)-(33),
and §141.62(b) (11H15),  initial  compli-
ance period means the first full three-
year compliance period after promulga-
tion for systems with 150 or more serv-
ice connections (January 1993-Decem-
ber 1995), and first full three-year com-
pliance period after the effective  date
of the regulation (January 1996-Decem-
ber 1998) for systems having fewer than
150 service connections.
  Large water system, for the purpose of
subpart I of this part  only, means  a
water  system that  serves more than
50,000 persons.
  Lead service line means a service line
made of lead which connects the water
main to the building inlet and any lead
pigtail, gooseneck  or  other   fitting
which is connected to such lead line.
  Legionella means a genus of bacteria,
some species of  which have caused  a
type of pneumonia called Legionnaires
Disease.
  Man-made beta  particle  and  photon
emitters means  all radionuclides emit-
ting beta particles and/or photons list-
ed in Maximum Permissible Body  Bur-
dens and  Maximum  Permissible Con-
centration of Radionuclides  in Air or
Water  for Occupational Exposure,  NBS
Handbook 69, except the daughter prod-
ucts of thorium-232, uranium-235  and
uranium-238.
  Maximum contaminant level means the
maximum permissable level of a  con-
taminant in water which is delivered to
any user of a public water system.
  Maximum  contaminant level  goal  or
MCLG means the maximum  level  of a
contaminant  in  drinking   water  at
which no known or anticipated adverse
effect  on the health of persons would
occur,  and  which allows an adequate
margin of  safety. Maximum contami-
nant  level  goals are  nonenforceable
health goals.
  Maximum  residual  disinfectant  level
(MRDL) means  a level of a disinfectant
added  for water treatment  that  may
not be exceeded at the  consumer's tap
without an  unacceptable possibility of
adverse health effects. For chlorine and
chloramines, a PWS is in compliance
with the MRDL when the running an-
nual average of monthly averages of
samples taken  in the distribution sys-
tem, computed quarterly, is less than
                                    348

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.2
or equal to the MRDL. For chlorine di-
oxide, a PWS is in compliance with the
MRDL when daily samples are taken at
the entrance to the distribution system
and no  two consecutive daily samples
exceed the MRDL. MRDLs are enforce-
able in the same manner as maximum
contaminant levels under Section 1412
of the Safe Drinking Water Act. There
is convincing evidence that addition of
a disinfectant is  necessary for control
of waterborne microbial contaminants.
Notwithstanding  the  MRDLs listed  in
§141.65,  operators may increase resid-
ual disinfectant  levels of chlorine  or
chloramines (but not chlorine dioxide)
in the distribution system to a level
and  for a time  necessary to  protect
public health to address specific micro-
biological   contamination   problems
caused by circumstances such as dis-
tribution  line breaks,  storm  runoff
events, source water contamination,  or
cross-connections.
  Maximum  residual  disinfectant  level
goal (MRDLG) means  the  maximum
level of a disinfectant added for water
treatment at  which no known or an-
ticipated  adverse effect on the health
of persons would occur, and  which al-
lows an  adequate  margin  of safety.
MRDLGs  are  nonenforceable health
goals and do not reflect the benefit of
the addition  of the chemical for  con-
trol of waterborne microbial contami-
nants.
  Maximum Total  Trihalomethane Poten-
tial (MTP) means the  maximum  con-
centration of  total  trihalomethanes
produced in a given water containing a
disinfectant residual  after 7 days  at a
temperature of 25 °C or above.
  Medium-size water system, for the pur-
pose of subpart  I  of this part  only,
means   a  water  system that  serves
greater than  3,300 and less  than  or
equal to 50,000 persons.
  Near  the first service connection means
at one of the  20 percent of all service
connections in the entire system  that
are nearest the water supply treatment
facility, as measured by water trans-
port time within the distribution sys-
tem.
  Non-community  water  system means a
public water system that is not a com-
munity water  system.  A non-commu-
nity water system is either a "transient
non-community water  system (TWS)"
or  a  "non-transient  non-community
water system (NTNCWS)."
  Non-transient  non-community   water
system  or  NTNCWS  means  a  public
water system that is not a community
water system and that regularly serves
at least 25 of  the same persons over 6
months per year.
  Optimal corrosion control treatment, for
the purpose of subpart I of this part
only,  means  the  corrosion  control
treatment that minimizes the lead and
copper concentrations  at  users'  taps
while insuring that the treatment does
not cause the water system to violate
any  national  primary drinking  water
regulations.
  Performance  evaluation sample means
a reference  sample provided to a lab-
oratory  for  the  purpose  of  dem-
onstrating that the laboratory can suc-
cessfully analyze  the  sample  within
limits  of performance specified by the
Agency. The  true  value of the  con-
centration of the reference material is
unknown to the laboratory at the time
of the analysis.
  Person means an individual; corpora-
tion;  company; association;  partner-
ship; municipality; or State, Federal,
or tribal agency.
  Picocurie (pd) means the quantity of
radioactive material producing 2.22 nu-
clear transformations per minute.
  Point of disinfectant application is the
point where the disinfectant  is applied
and water downstream of that point is
not subject to recontamination by sur-
face water runoff.
  Point-of-entry treatment device (POE)
is a treatment device  applied  to the
drinking water entering a  house  or
building  for the  purpose of  reducing
contaminants  in the  drinking water
distributed  throughout the  house  or
building.
  Pomt-of-use treatment device (POU) is
a treatment device applied to a single
tap used for the purpose of reducing
contaminants  in  drinking  water  at
that one tap.
  Public water system means  a system
for the provision to the public of water
for human  consumption through pipes
or,  after  August  5,  1998,  other  con-
structed  conveyances, if such system
has at  least fifteen  service connections
or regularly serves an average  of  at
least twenty-five individuals daily  at
                                    349

-------
§141.2
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
least 60 days out of the year. Such term
includes:  any  collection,  treatment,
storage,  and  distribution   facilities
under control of the operator of such
system  and used primarily in connec-
tion with such system;  and any collec-
tion or  pretreatment storage  facilities
not under such control which are used
primarily in connection with such sys-
tem. Such term does not include any
"special irrigation district." A public
water system is either a "community
water  system"  or a  "noncommunity
water system."
  Rem means the  unit  of dose equiva-
lent from ionizing  radiation to  the
total body  or  any internal organ  or
organ system. A "millirem (mrem)" is I/
1000 of a rem.
  Repeat compliance period means any
subsequent compliance period after the
initial compliance period.
  Residual disinfectant concentration ("C"
in  OT  calculations)  means the  con-
centration of disinfectant measured in
mg/1 in a  representative  sample  of
water.
  Sanitary survey means  an onsite re-
view of the water  source,  facilities,
equipment, operation and maintenance
of a public  water  system for the pur-
pose of evaluating  the adequacy of such
source,  facilities, equipment, operation
and maintenance for producing and dis-
tributing safe drinking water.
  Sedimentation means a process for re-
moval   of solids  before  filtration  by
gravity or separation.
  Service connection, as used in the defi-
nition of public water system,  does not
include  a connection to a system that
delivers water by a  constructed con-
veyance other than a pipe if:
  (1) The water is used exclusively for
purposes other  than residential  uses
(consisting  of drinking,  bathing, and
cooking, or other similar uses);
  (2) The State determines that alter-
native water to achieve the equivalent
level of public health  protection pro-
vided by  the  applicable  national pri-
mary drinking water regulation is pro-
vided for residential or  similar uses for
drinking and cooking'; or
  (3) The State determines that  the
water provided for residential or simi-
lar uses  for  drinking,  cooking, and
bathing is centrally treated or treated
at the point of entry by the provider, a
pass-through  entity, or  the user  to
achieve the equivalent level of protec-
tion provided  by the  applicable  na-
tional  primary drinking water regula-
tions.
  Service line sample means a one-liter
sample of water collected in accord-
ance with §141.86(b)(3), that has been
standing for at least 6 hours in a serv-
ice line.
  Single family structure, for the purpose
of subpart I of this part only, means a
building constructed as a single-family
residence that is currently used as  ei-
ther a  residence or a place of business.
  Slow  sand filtration means a process
involving passage of raw water through
a bed of sand at low velocity (generally
less than 0.4 m/h) resulting in substan-
tial  particulate removal  by physical
and biological mechanisms.
  Small water system, for the purpose of
subpart I of this  part only, means a
water system that serves 3,300 persons
or fewer.
  Special irrigation district means an  ir-
rigation district in  existence prior to
May 18, 1994  that  provides primarily
agricultural  service through a  piped
water system with only incidental resi-
dential or similar use where the system
or the residential or similar users of
the system comply with the exclusion
provisions in section 1401(4)(B)(i)(II) or
(III).
  Standard sample means the aliquot of
finished drinking water that is exam-
ined for the presence of coliform bac-
teria.
  State means the  agency of the  State
or Tribal government which has  juris-
diction over public water systems. Dur-
ing any period when a State or Tribal
government does not have primary en-
forcement responsibility pursuant  to
section  1413  of  the  Act,  the  term
"State" means the  Regional Adminis-
trator, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
  Subpart H systems means public water
systems using surface water or ground
water under the direct influence of sur-
face water as a source that are subject
to the  requirements of subpart H of
this part.
  Supplier of water means  any person
who owns or  operates  a public water
system.
                                     350

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §141.4
  Surface water means all water which
is open to the atmosphere and subject
to surface runoff.
  SUVA means Specific Ultraviolet Ab-
sorption at 254 nanometers (nm), an in-
dicator of the humic content of water.
It is a calculated  parameter obtained
by  dividing a sample's ultraviolet  ab-
sorption  at  a wavelength of  254  nm
(UV254> (in m=l) by its concentration of
dissolved organic carbon  (DOC) (in mg/
L).
  System with a single service connection
means a system which supplies drink-
ing  water to consumers  via a single
service line.
  Too numerous to count means that  the
total number of bacterial colonies  ex-
ceeds 200 on a 47-mm diameter mem-
brane  filter  used  for coliform detec-
tion.
  Total Organic Carbon  (TOC) means
total organic carbon in mg/L measured
using heat, oxygen, ultraviolet  irradia-
tion, chemical oxidants,  or  combina-
tions of these oxidants that convert or-
ganic carbon to carbon dioxide, round-
ed to two significant figures.
  Total trihalomethanes (TTHM) means
the  sum  of  the  concentration   in
milligrams per  liter  of  the   trihalo-
methane compounds (trichloromethane
[chloroform],  dibromochloromethane,
bromodichloromethane            and
tribromomethane [bromoform]), round-
ed to two significant figures.
  Transient non-community water system
or TWS means a non-community water
system that does not regularly serve at
least 25  of the same persons over  six
months per year.
  Trihalomethane  (THM) means one  of
the  family  of  organic   compounds,
named  as  derivatives   of methane,
wherein  three of  the  four hydrogen
atoms in methane are each substituted
by  a halogen atom in the molecular
structure.
  Uncovered finished water storage  facil-
ity is a tank,  reservoir, or other facility
used to store water that will  undergo
no  further treatment except  residual
disinfection and is open to the atmos-
phere.
  Virus means a  virus of fecal origin
which  is infectious to humans  by wa-
terborne transmission.
  Waterborne  disease outbreak means the
significant occurrence  of acute infec-
tious illness, epidemiologically associ-
ated with the ingestion of water from a
public water system which is deficient
in treatment, as determined by the ap-
propriate local or State agency.

[40 FR 59570, Dec. 24,  1975, as amended at 41
FR 28403, July 9, 1976; 44 FR 68641, Nov. 29,
1979;  51 FR 11410, Apr. 2,  1986; 52  FR 20674,
June 2, 1987; 52 FR 25712, July 8, 1987; 53 FR
37410,  Sept. 26, 1988; 54 FR 27526, 27562, June
29, 1989; 56 FR 3578, Jan. 30, 1991; 56 FR 26547,
June 7, 1991; 57 FR 31838, July 17, 1992; 59 FR
34322,  July 1, 1994; 61  FR 24368, May 14, 1996;
63 FR 23366, Apr. 28, 1998; 63  FR 69463, 69515,
Dec. 16, 1998; 66 FR 7061, Jan. 22, 2001; 67 FR
1835, Jan. 14, 2002]

§ 141.3  Coverage.

  This part shall apply to each  public
water system,  unless the public water
system meets all of the following con-
ditions:
  (a)  Consists only of distribution and
storage  facilities  (and does not have
any  collection  and treatment  facili-
ties);
  (b)  Obtains all of its water from, but
is not owned or operated by,  a  public
water system  to  which  such regula-
tions apply:
  (c) Does not sell water to any person;
and
  (d)  Is  not  a  carrier  which  conveys
passengers in interstate commerce.

§ 141.4  Variances and exemptions.
  (a)  Variances  or exemptions  from
certain provisions of these regulations
may  be  granted pursuant to  sections
1415 and 1416 of the Act and subpart K
of part 142 of  this chapter  (for small
system variances)  by  the entity with
primary  enforcement  responsibility,
except  that  variances  or exemptions
from  the MCL  for  total coliforms and
variances from any of the  treatment
technique requirements of subpart H of
this part may not be granted.
  (b) EPA has stayed the effective date
of this section relating  to the  total
coliform MCL of §141.63(a) for  systems
that demonstrate to the State  that the
violation of the total coliform MCL is
due to a persistent growth of total coli-
forms in the distribution system rather
than  fecal or  pathogenic contamina-
tion,  a  treatment lapse or deficiency,
                                     351

-------
§141.5
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
or a problem in the operation or main-
tenance of the distribution system.

[54 FR 27562, June 29, 1989, as amended at 56
FR  1557, Jan. 15, 1991; 63  FR 43846, Aug. 14,
1998]

§ 141.5  Siting requirements.
  Before a person may enter into a fi-
nancial  commitment  for or  initiate
construction of a new public water sys-
tem or increase the capacity of an ex-
isting public water system, he shall no-
tify the  State and, to the extent prac-
ticable, avoid locating part or all of the
new or  expanded facility  at  a site
which:
  (a) Is  subject  to a  significant risk
from earthquakes, floods, fires or other
disasters which could  cause a break-
down of the public water system or a
portion thereof; or
  (b) Except for intake  structures, Is
within  the  floodplain  of a  100-year
flood or  is  lower than  any  recorded
high  tide where  appropriate  records
exist. The U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency will  not seek to override
land  use  decisions affecting  public
water systems siting which  are made
at the State or local government lev-
els.

§ 141.6  Effective dates.
  (a) Except as provided  in paragraphs
(b)  through (k) of this section, and in
§141.80(a)(2),  the regulations set forth
in this  part  shall take effect on June
24, 1977.
  (b) The regulations for total trihalo-
methanes set forth  in §141.12(c) shall
take effect 2 years  after the date of
promulgation of these regulations for
community  water  systems  serving
75,000 or more individuals, and 4 years
after the date of promulgation for com-
munities serving  10,000 to 74,999 indi-
viduals.
  (c)  The  regulations  set  forth  in
§§141.11(d); 141.21(a), (c) and (i); 141.22(a)
and (e);  141.23(a)(3) and (a)(4); 141.23(f);
141.24(e)  and  (f);  141.25(e);   141.27(a);
141.28(a) and (b);  141.31(a), (d)  and (e);
141.32(b)(3); and 141.32(d)  shall  take  ef-
fect immediately upon  promulgation.
  (d)  The  regulations  set  forth  in
§141.41 shall take effect 18 months from
the  date of  promulgation.  Suppliers
must complete the first round of sam-
pling and reporting  within 12 months
following the effective date.
  (e)  The   regulations   set   forth  in
§141.42 shall take effect 18 months from
the date of promulgation.  All require-
ments in §141.42 must  be completed
within 12 months following  the effec-
tive date.
  (f)  The  regulations   set   forth  in
§141.11(c) and  §141.23(g) are  effective
May 2, 1986. Section 141.23(g)(4) is effec-
tive October 2,  1987.
  (g)  The   regulations  contained  in
§141.6, paragraph (c) of the  table in
141.12, and 141.62(b)(l) are effective July
1,  1991.  The regulations contained in
§§141.11(b),   141.23,   141.24,   142.57(b),
143.4(b)(12)   and  (b)(13),  are  effective
July 30, 1992. The regulations contained
in the revisions to §§141.32(e) (16), (25)
through  (27) and (46); 141.61(c)(16);  and
141.62(b)(3) are  effective January 1, 1993.
The effective date of regulations con-
tained in §141.61(c)  (2),  (3), and (4) is
postponed.
  (h)  Regulations  for  the  analytic
methods  listed   at  §141.23(k)(4)  for
measuring antimony,  beryllium, cya-
nide,  nickel, and thallium are effective
August  17,  1992.  Regulations for  the
analytic methods listed at §141.24(f)(16)
for  dichloromethane,  1,2,4-trichloro-
benzene, and 1,1,2-trichloroethane are
effective August 17, 1992.  Regulations
for the  analytic  methods  listed  at
§ 141.24(h)(12)  for  measuring  dalapon,
dinoseb,   diquat,  endothall,   endrin,
glyphosate,     oxamyl,     picloram,
simazine,     benzo(a)pyrene,     di(2-
ethylhexyl)adipate,                di(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate,   hexachloroben-
zene, hexachlorocyclopentadiene,  and
2,3,7,8-TCDD are  effective August  17,
1992. The revision to §141.12(a) promul-
gated on July 17, 1992  is  effective on
August 17, 1992.
  (i) [Reserved]
  (j)  The arsenic maximum  contami-
nant levels (MCL) listed in §141.62 is ef-
fective for the purpose  of compliance
on  January 23, 2006. Requirements re-
lating   to   arsenic  set   forth   in
§§141.23(i)(4),  141.23(k)(3)  introductory
text,  141.23(k)(3)(ii),  141.51(b), 141.62(b),
141.62(b)(16),   141.62(c),  141.62(d),  and
142.62(b)  revisions in  Appendix A of sub-
part  O  for  the consumer confidence
rule,  and Appendices A  and B  of sub-
part Q for the public notification rule
                                      352

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.13
are effective for the purpose of compli-
ance  on January 23, 2006. However, the
consumer confidence rule reporting re-
quirements relating to arsenic listed in
§141.154(b) and (f) are effective for the
purpose of compliance on February 22,
2002.
  (k)    Regulations   set   forth   in
§§141.23(i)(l),  141.23(i)(2),   141.24(f)(15),
141.24(f)(22),  141.24(h)(ll),  141.24(h)(20),
142.16(e), 142.16(j), and 142.16(k) are ef-
fective for  the  purpose of compliance
on January 22, 2004.
[44 FR 68641, Nov. 29, 1979, as amended at 45
FR 57342, Aug. 27, 1980; 47 FR 10998, Mar. 12,
1982; 51 FR 11410, Apr. 2, 1986;  56 FR 30274,
July 1, 1991; 57 FR 22178, May 27, 1992; 57 FR
31838,  July 17, 1992; 59 FR 34322, July 1,  1994;
61 FR 24368, May 14, 1996; 66 FR 7061, Jan. 22,
2001; 66 FR 28350, May 22, 2001]

        Subport B—Maximum
        Contaminant Levels

§141.11  Maximum contaminant levels
   for inorganic chemicals.
  (a)  The maximum contaminant level
for arsenic  applies only to community
water systems. The analyses and deter-
mination of compliance  with the  0.05
milligrams  per  liter  maximum  con-
taminant level  for arsenic use the re-
quirements of § 141.23.
  (b)  The maximum contaminant level
for arsenic  is 0.05 milligrams  per liter
for community  water  systems  until
January 23, 2006.
  (c) [Reserved]
  (d) At the discretion of the State, ni-
trate  levels not to exceed 20 mg/1 may
be allowed in a non-community water
system if the  supplier of water dem-
onstrates to  the satisfaction of  the
State that;
  (1) Such water will  not be available
to children  under 6 months of age;  and
  (2) The non-community water system
is meeting  the  public notification re-
quirements under §141.209,  including
continuous posting of the fact that ni-
trate  levels exceed 10  mg/1 and the po-
tential health effects of exposure; and
  (3) Local and State public health au-
thorities will be  notified annually of
nitrate levels that exceed 10 mg/1;  and
  (4) No adverse health effects shall re-
sult.

[40 FR 59570, Deo. 24, 1975, as amended at 45
FR 57342, Aug. 27, 1980; 47 FR 10998, Mar. 12,
1982; 51 FR 11410, Apr. 2, 1986; 56 FR 3578, Jan.
30, 1991; 56 FR 26548, June 7, 1991; 56 FR 30274,
July 1, 1991; 56 FR 32113, July 15, 1991; 60 FR
33932,  June 29, 1995; 65 FR 26022, May 4, 2000;
66 FR  7061,  Jan  22, 2001]

§ 141.12 Maximum  contaminant levels
   for total trihalomethanes.
  The maximum contaminant level of
0.10  mg/L  for  total  trihalomethanes
(the  sum  of  the  concentrations  of
bromodichloromethane,
dibromochloromethane,
tribromomethane   (bromoform),   and
trichloromethane (chloroform)) applies
to subpart H community water systems
which serve a population of 10,000 peo-
ple or  more until  December 31,  2001.
This level applies to community water
systems that use  only ground water
not under the direct influence of sur-
face  water and serve a population  of
10,000 people  or  more  until December
31, 2003. Compliance with the maximum
contaminant     level     for     total
trihalomethanes is calculated pursuant
to §141.30. After December 31, 2003, this
section is no longer applicable.

[63 FR 69463, Dec. 16, 1998, as amended at 66
FR 3776,  Jan. 16, 2001]

§ 141.13 Maximum  contaminant levels
   for turbidity.
  The maximum  contaminant  levels
for turbidity are  applicable  to   both
community water  systems and   non-
community water systems  using sur-
face water sources in whole or in part.
The maximum contaminant levels for
turbidity  in drinking water,  measured
at a  representative entry point(s)  to
the distribution system, are:

  EDITORIAL NOTE: At 54 FR 27527, June 29,
1989, §141.13 was amended by adding  intro-
ductory  text, effective December 31,  1990.
However, introductory text already exists.
The added text follows.
  The requirements in  this  section
apply to unfiltered systems  until De-
cember 30,  1991,  unless the State has
determined prior to that date, in writ-
ing pursuant to §1412(b)(7)(C)(iii),  that
filtration  is required. The requirements
                                     353

-------
§141.21
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
in this section  apply to filtered sys-
tems  until June 29, 1993. The  require-
ments  in  this   section   apply   to
unfiltered systems that the State  has
determined,  in   writing  pursuant  to
§1412(b)(7)(C)(iii),  must  install filtra-
tion, until June  29, 1993, or until filtra-
tion is installed, whichever is later.
  (a) One turbidity unit (TU), as deter-
mined by a monthly average pursuant
to §141.22, except that five or fewer tur-
bidity units may be allowed if the sup-
plier  of water can demonstrate to  the
State  that  the  higher turbidity  does
not do any of the following:
  (1) Interfere with disinfection;
  (2) Prevent maintenance of an effec-
tive disinfectant agent throughout the
distribution system; or
  (3) Interfere with microbiological de-
terminations.
  (b) Five turbidity units based on an
average for two consecutive days pur-
suant to §141.22.
[40 FR 59570, Deo. 24, 1975]

    Subpart C—Monitoring and
      Analytical Requirements

§ 141.21 Coliform sampling.
  (a)   Routine  monitoring.  (1)  Public
water  systems must  collect total coli-
form  samples at sites which  are rep-
resentative  of water throughout  the
distribution  system  according to  a
written sample siting plan. These plans
are subject to  State review and revi-
sion.
  (2)  The  monitoring frequency  for
total  coliforms  for community water
systems is  based  on  the  population
served by the system, as follows:

TOTAL COLIFORM MONITORING FREQUENCY FOR
        COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS
TOTAL COLIFORM MONITORING FREQUENCY FOR
  COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS—Continued
Population served
25 to 1, 000 1 ... 	
1 ,001 to 2,500
2,501 to 3,300
3,301 to 4,100 	 . ...
4,101 to 4,900 	 	
4,901 to 5,800 , 	
5,801 to 6,700 . ... . .
6,701 to 7,600 . . . .
7,601 to 8,500 	 	
8501 to 12900
12,901 to 17,200 	
Minimum
number
of sam-
ples per
month
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
15
Population served
17,201 to 21 ,500 ...
21,501 to 25,000 ...
25,001 to 33,000 	
33,001 to 41 ,000 	 	
41,001 to 50,000 	
50,001 to 59,000 	 	
59,001 to 70,000 ....
70,001 to 83,000 	 	
83,001 to 96,000 	
96,001 to 130,000 	
130,001 to 220,000 	
220,001 to 320,000 . .
320,001 to 450,000 	 	
450,001 to 600,000 	 	
600,001 to 780,000 	 	
780,001 to 970,000 ..
970,001 to 1,230,000 	 	
1,230,001 to 1,520,000 .... 	
1,520,001 to 1,850,000 	
1,850,001 102,270,000 ....
2,270,001 to 3,020,000 	
3,020,001 to 3,960,000 	
3 960 001 or more

Minimum
number
of sam-
ples per
month
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
450
480

 'Includes public water systems which have at least 15
service connections, but serve fewer than 25 persons.

If  a community water system serving
25  to 1,000 persons has no history of
total coliform  contamination  in  its
current configuration and  a sanitary
survey conducted in the past five years
shows that the system is supplied sole-
ly  by a protected groundwater source
and  is  free  of sanitary defects,  the
State may reduce the monitoring fre-
quency  specified above, except that in
no case may the State reduce the mon-
itoring frequency to less than one sam-
ple per quarter. The  State must ap-
prove  the  reduced  monitoring  fre-
quency in writing.
 (3)  The  monitoring frequency  for
total  coliforms  for  non-community
water systems is as follows:
 (i) A  non-community water system
using   only   ground   water  (except
ground  water under  the direct  influ-
ence of surface water,  as  defined in
§141.2)  and serving  1,000 persons  or
fewer  must  monitor  each  calendar
quarter that the system provides water
to  the  public,  except that  the  State
may reduce this monitoring frequency,
in  writing, if a sanitary  survey  shows
that the system is  free of sanitary  de-
fects.  Beginning  June  29,  1994,  the
State cannot reduce  the monitoring
frequency for a non-community  water
                                     354

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.21
system using only ground water  (ex-
cept ground water under the direct in-
fluence of surface water,  as defined in
§141.2)  and  serving  1,000  persons or
fewer to less than once/year.
  (ii) A non-community water system
using   only   ground   water  (except
ground water under  the direct  influ-
ence  of surface  water,  as defined in
§141.2) and serving more than 1,000  per-
sons during any  month must monitor
at the same  frequency as a like-sized
community water system, as specified
in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, ex-
cept the State may reduce this  moni-
toring frequency, in writing, for  any
month the system serves 1,000 persons
or fewer.  The State cannot reduce the
monitoring  frequency to  less  than
once/year. For systems using ground
water under the direct influence of  sur-
face water, paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of  this
section applies.
  (iii) A non-community water system
using surface water, in total or in part,
must monitor at  the same frequency as
a like-sized community water system,
as specified in paragraph (a)(2) of  this
section,  regardless of  the  number of
persons it serves.
  (iv) A non-community water system
using ground water  under the  direct
influence  of  surface water, as defined
in §141.2, must monitor  at the  same
frequency as  a like-sized community
water system, as  specified in paragraph
(a)(2) of this  section.  The system must
begin monitoring at this frequency be-
ginning six months after the State de-
termines  that the  ground water is
under  the direct influence of surface
water.
  (4) The public water system must  col-
lect samples  at regular time intervals
throughout the month, except that  a
system which uses only ground  water
(except ground water under the  direct
influence  of surface water, as defined
in §141.2), and serves 4,900 persons or
fewer, may collect all required samples
on a single day if they are  taken from
different sites.
  (5) A  public water  system that uses
surface water or ground water  under
the direct influence of surface water, as
defined in §141.2,  and does not practice
filtration in  compliance with Subpart
H must collect at least one sample near
the first service  connection each  day
the turbidity level of the source water,
measured as specified in §141.74(b)(2),
exceeds 1 NTU. This sample must  be
analyzed for the presence of total coli-
forms. When  one  or more turbidity
measurements  in any day exceed  1
NTU, the system must collect this coli-
form sample within 24 hours of the first
exceedance, unless  the  State  deter-
mines that the system, for logistical
reasons outside the  system's control,
cannot have the sample analyzed with-
in 30 hours of collection. Sample re-
sults from  this  coliform monitoring
must be included in determining com-
pliance with the MCL for  total  coli-
forms in §141.63.
  (6) Special purpose samples, such  as
those taken to determine whether dis-
infection  practices are sufficient fol-
lowing pipe placement, replacement,  or
repair, shall not be used to determine
compliance  with the MCL  for total
conforms  in §141.63. Repeat samples
taken pursuant to paragraph (b) of this
section are not considered special pur-
pose samples, and must be used to de-
termine compliance with the MCL for
total coliforms in § 141.63.
  (b) Repeat monitoring. (1) If a routine
sample is total coliform-positive, the
public water system must collect a set
of repeat  samples within 24 hours  of
being notified of the positive result. A
system which collects more than one
routine sample/month must collect no
fewer than three repeat samples for
each  total coliform-positive  sample
found. A  system  which  collects one
routine sample/month or fewer must
collect no fewer than four repeat sam-
ples  for  each  total  coliform-positive
sample found. The  State may  extend
the  24-hour limit  on a  case-by-case
basis if the system  has a  logistical
problem in  collecting the repeat sam-
ples  within 24 hours that is beyond its
control. In  the  case  of  an extension,
the State  must specify how much time
the system has to  collect  the  repeat
samples.
  (2) The system  must collect at least
one repeat sample  from the sampling
tap where the original total coliform-
positive sample was taken, and at least
one repeat sample at a tap within five
service connections upstream  and  at
least one repeat sample at a tap within
five service connections downstream  of
                                    355

-------
§141.21
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
the original  sampling site. If a total
coliform-positive sample is at the end
of the distribution system, or one away
from the  end of the distribution sys-
tem, the State may waive the require-
ment to  collect at least one  repeat
sample upstream or downstream of the
original sampling site.
  (3) The  system must collect all re-
peat samples on the same day,  except
that the  State may allow a system
with a single service connection to col-
lect the required set of repeat samples
over a four-day period  or to collect a
larger volume repeat sample(s) in one
or more sample containers of any size,
as long as the total volume collected is
at  least 400  ml  (300 ml  for  systems
which collect more than  one  routine
sample/month).
  (4) If one or more repeat samples  in
the set  is total coliform-positive, the
public  water system must collect an
additional set of repeat samples in the
manner specified in paragraphs (b) (1)-
(3) of this section. The additional sam-
ples must be collected within 24 hours
of being notified of the  positive result,
unless the State extends the  limit  as
provided in paragraph (b)(l) of this sec-
tion.  The system  must  repeat  this
process until either total  coliforms are
not detected in one complete set of re-
peat samples or the system determines
that the  MCL for total  coliforms  in
§141.63 has been exceeded and notifies
the State.
  (5) If a system collecting fewer than
five routine samples/month has one  or
more  total  coliform-positive  samples
and the State does  not invalidate the
sample(s)  under paragraph (c) of this
section, it must collect  at least five
routine samples during the next month
the system provides water to  the pub-
lic, except that the State may waive
this requirement if the conditions  of
paragraph (b)(5) (i) or (ii) of this sec-
tion are met. The  State cannot waive
the requirement for a system to collect
repeat samples in paragraphs (b) (l)-(4)
of this section.
  (i) The State may waive the require-
ment to collect  five routine samples
the next  month  the system  provides
water to the  public if the State,  or an
agent approved by the State, performs
a site visit before the end of  the  next
month the system  provides water  to
the public. Although a sanitary survey
need not  be  performed,  the  site visit
must be  sufficiently detailed to allow
the State to determine  whether addi-
tional  monitoring and/or any  correc-
tive action is needed. The State cannot
approve an employee  of  the system to
perform this  site visit, even if the em-
ployee  is an  agent approved  by  the
State to perform sanitary surveys.
  (ii) The State may waive the require-
ment to  collect  five  routine samples
the next  month  the  system provides
water to  the public if  the State has de-
termined  why the sample  was  total
coliform-positive and establishes that
the system has corrected the problem
or will correct the problem before  the
end  of  the  next month the  system
serves water to the public. In this case,
the State must document this decision
to waive  the  following  month's addi-
tional monitoring requirement in writ-
ing, have it approved and signed by  the
supervisor of the State official who
recommends such a decision,  and make
this document available to  the EPA
and public. The written documentation
must describe the specific cause of  the
total  coliform-positive  sample  and
what action the system has taken and/
or will take  to correct  this problem.
The  State cannot waive the require-
ment to  collect  five  routine samples
the next  month  the  system provides
water  to the public solely on   the
grounds  that all  repeat samples  are
total coliform-negative. Under  this
paragraph, a  system must still take at
least one routine sample  before the end
of the  next month it  serves water to
the public and use it to determine com-
pliance with the  MCL for total coli-
forms in §141.63,  unless  the  State  has
determined that  the  system has  cor-
rected  the contamination problem  be-
fore the system took  the set of repeat
samples required in paragraphs (b)  (1)-
(4) of this section, and all repeat sam-
ples were total coliform-negative.
  (6) After a  system collects a routine
sample and before it learns the results
of the analysis of that sample, if it col-
lects another routine sample(s) from
within five adjacent  service connec-
tions of the initial sample, and the ini-
tial sample, after analysis, is found to
                                    356

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.21
contain total coliforms, then the sys-
tem may count  the subsequent sam-
ple(s) as a repeat sample instead of as
a routine sample.
  (7) Results of all routine and repeat
samples not invalidated by the  State
must be included in determining com-
pliance with the MCL for total coli-
forms in §141.63.
  (c) Invalidation of total collform sam-
ples. A total coliform-positive sample
invalidated  under  this  paragraph  (c)
does not  count  towards meeting  the
minimum monitoring requirements of
this section.
  (1) The State may invalidate a total
coliform-positive sample only  if  the
conditions of paragraph (c)(l)  (i), (ii),
or (iii) of this section are met.
  (i) The  laboratory establishes that
improper  sample analysis  caused  the
total coliform-positive result.
  (ii) The  State, on the basis of the re-
sults of repeat samples collected as re-
quired by paragraphs (b) (1) through (4)
of this section,  determines that  the
total coliform-positive sample resulted
from a domestic  or other non-distribu-
tion system plumbing  problem. The
State  cannot invalidate  a sample on
the basis  of repeat sample  results  un-
less  all repeat sample(s) collected  at
the same tap as the original total coli-
form-positive sample are  also  total
coliform-positive, and all  repeat sam-
ples collected within five service con-
nections  of  the original tap are total
coliform-negative (e.g., a State cannot
invalidate  a total  coliform-positive
sample on the basis of repeat samples if
all the repeat  samples are total coli-
form-negative,  or if  the  public water
system has  only one service  connec-
tion).
  (iii)  The  State  has   substantial
grounds to  believe that  a total coli-
form-positive  result  is due to a cir-
cumstance or condition which does not
reflect water quality in  the distribu-
tion system. In this case, the system
must still collect all repeat samples re-
quired under paragraphs (b) (l)-(4)  of
this section, and use them to deter-
mine compliance with  the MCL  for
total coliforms in §141.63. To invalidate
a total coliform-positive sample under
this paragraph, the decision with  the
rationale for the  decision must be doc-
umented in  writing, and approved and
signed by the supervisor of  the  State
official who recommended the decision.
The  State must  make this  document
available  to EPA and the public. The
written documentation must state the
specific cause  of the total  coliform-
positive sample,  and what action  the
system has taken, or will take, to cor-
rect  this problem. The State may not
invalidate  a  total  coliform-positive
sample solely on the grounds that all
repeat samples are total coliform-nega-
tive.
  (2) A laboratory must invalidate  a
total  coliform  sample  (unless  total
coliforms  are detected)  if the sample
produces a turbid  culture in the  ab-
sence of gas  production using an ana-
lytical method where gas formation is
examined  (e.g., the Multiple-Tube Fer-
mentation  Technique),  produces   a
turbid culture in the absence  of an acid
reaction in the Presence-Absence  (P-A)
Coliform  Test,  or exhibits  confluent
growth or produces colonies too numer-
ous to count with an analytical method
using  a membrane  filter  (e.g.,  Mem-
brane  Filter Technique). If  a  labora-
tory invalidates  a sample because of
such interference, the system must col-
lect  another sample from the same lo-
cation as the original sample within 24
hours  of being  notified of the  inter-
ference problem,  and have it analyzed
for the presence of total coliforms. The
system must continue  to  re-sample
within 24  hours and have the samples
analyzed until it obtains a valid result.
The  State may waive the 24-hour time
limit on a case-by-case basis.
  (d)  Sanitary  surveys.   (l)(i)  Public
water systems which do not collect five
or more  routine samples/month  must
undergo an initial  sanitary survey by
June 29,  1994,  for community public
water  systems and  June 29, 1999,  for
non-community  water systems. There-
after,  systems  must undergo another
sanitary  survey every  five years,  ex-
cept that non-community water sys-
tems using  only protected  and dis-
infected ground water, as defined by
the  State, must  undergo subsequent
sanitary  surveys  at least every  ten
years after the initial sanitary survey.
The  State must review  the  results of
each  sanitary  survey  to  determine
whether the  existing monitoring fre-
quency is adequate and what additional
                                    357

-------
§141.21
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
measures, if any,  the  system needs to
undertake  to improve drinking-  water
quality.
  (ii)  In conducting1  a sanitary  survey
of  a system using- ground  water in  a
State  having  an  EPA-approved  well-
head protection program under section
1428 of the  Safe Drinking-  Water Act,
information  on  sources of  contamina-
tion  within the  delineated  wellhead
protection  area that was collected in
the course  of  developing  and  imple-
menting the program should be consid-
ered instead of  collecting new informa-
tion,  if the information was collected
since  the last time the system was sub-
ject to a sanitary survey.
  (2)  Sanitary  surveys  must be per-
formed by  the  State  or an agent  ap-
proved by the State. The  system is re-
sponsible for ensuring  the survey takes
place.
  (e) Fecal  coliforms/Escherichia coli  (E.
coli) testing. (1) If any routine or repeat
sample is total coliform-positive,  the
system must analyze  that  total coli-
form-positive culture medium to deter-
mine  if fecal coliforms are present,  ex-
cept that the  system  may  test  for E.
coli in lieu  of fecal  coliforms. If fecal
coliforms or E. coli are present, the sys-
tem must notify the  State by the end
of the  day when the system is notified
of the  test result, unless the system is
notified of the result after the State of-
fice is  closed, in which case the system
must notify the  State before the end of
the next business day.
  (2) The  State  has the discretion  to
allow a public water system, on a  case-
by-case basis, to forgo fecal coliform or
E. coli  testing on a total coliform-posi-
tive  sample  if  that system  assumes
that the total coliform-positive sample
is fecal coliform-positive or E. coK-posi-
tive. Accordingly, the system must no-
tify the State as specified in paragraph
(e)(l) of .this section and  the provisions
of §141.63(b) apply.
  (f)  Analytical  methodology.  (1)  The
standard  sample volume required  for
total  coliform  analysis, regardless  of
analytical method used,  is 100 ml.
  (2) Public  water  systems need  only
determine the presence  or absence  of
total   coliforms; a  determination   of
total coliform density is not required.
  (3) Public  water  systems must con-
duct total coliform analyses in accord-
ance with one of the analytical meth-
ods in  the following table.
      Organism
                                          Methodology1:
                                                                                Citation1
Total Coliforms2 ..
                    Total Coliform Fermentation Technique '•"•'    	
                    Total Coliform Membrane Filter Technique 6
                    Presence-Absence (P-A) Coliform Test'7
                    ONPG-MUG Tests  	
                    Colisure Test 8
                    E'Colite® Test10
                    m-ColiBlue24®Test11.
                    Readycult® Coliforms 100 Presence/Absence Test13
                    Membrane Filter Technique using Chromocult® Coliform Agar1'
                    Colitag® Test'5.
                            9221A, B
                            9222A, B, C
                            9221D
                            9223
  The procedures shall be done in accordance with the documents listed below The incorporation by reference of the following
documents listed in footnotes 1, 6, 8, 9, 10 , 11, 13, 14 and 15 was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accord-
ance with 5 U S C 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies of the documents may be obtained from the sources listed below  Infor-
mation regarding obtaining these documents can be obtained  from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 800-426—4791  Docu-
ments may be inspected at EPA's Drinking Water Docket, EPA West, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, EPA West, Room B102,
Washington DC 20460 (Telephone: 202-566-2426); or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) For infor-
mation on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to http.//www archives gov/federal	register/
code  of federal regu/ations/ibr__locations.html
  1 Standard Metriods for the Examination of Water  and Wastewater, 18th edition (1992), 19th edition (1995), or 20th edition
(1998)  American Public Health Association, 1015 Fifteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005. The cited methods published in
any of these three editions may be used
  * The time from sample collection to initiation of analysis may not exceed 30 hours Systems are encouraged but not required
to hold samples below 10 deg. C during transit
  3 Lactose broth, as commercially available, may be  used in lieu of lauryl tryptose broth, if the system conducts at least 25 par-
allel tests between this medium and lauryl tryptose broth using the water normally tested, and this comparison demonstrates that
the false-positive rate and false-negative rate for total  coliform, using lactose broth, is less than 10 percent
  4 If inverted tubes are used to detect gas production, the media should cover these tubes at least one-half to two-thirds after
the sample is added
  5 No requirement exists to run the completed phase on 10 percent of all total coliform-positive confirmed tubes
  6 Ml agar also may be used. Preparation and use of Ml agar  is set forth in the article, "New medium for the simultaneous de-
tection of total coliform and Eschenchia  coli in water" by Brenner, KP , et at, 1993, Appl. Environ Microbtol. 59.3534-3544
Also available from the Office of Water Resource Center (RC-4100T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW , Washington, DC 20460,
EPA/600/J-99/225 Verification of colonies is not required
  7 Six-times formulation strength may be used if the medium is filter-sterilized rather than autoclaved
  8 The ONPG-MUG Test is also known as the Autoanalysis Collect System
  9 A description of the Colisure Test, Feb 28, 1994, may be obtained from IDEXX Laboratories, Inc,  One  1DEXX Drive,
Westbrook, Maine 04092  The Colisure Test may be read  after an incubation time of 24 hours
                                            358

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                  §141.21
  10A description of the E'Colite® Test, "Presence/Absence for Coliforms and E Call in Water," Dec 21, 1997, is available from
Charm Sciences, Inc , 36 Franklin Street, Maiden, MA 02148-4120
  11 A description of the m-ColiBlue24 ® Test, Aug 17, 1999, is available from the Hach Company, 100 Dayton Avenue, Ames,
IA 50010
  12 EPA strongly recommends that laboratories evaluate the false-positive and negative rates for the method(s) they use for
monitoring total coliforms.  EPA also encourages laboratories to establish false-positive and false-negative rates within their own
laboratory and sample matrix (drinking water or source water) with the intent that if the method they choose has an unacceptable
false-positive or negative rate, another method can be used The Agency suggests that laboratories perform these studies on a
minimum of 5% of all  total coliform-positive samples, except for those methods where verification/confirmation is already re-
quired, e g , the M-Endo and LES Endo Membrane Filter Tests, Standard Total Coliform Fermentation Technique, and Presence-
Absence Cohform Test Methods for establishing false-positive and negative-rates may be based on lactose fermentation, the
rapid test for (3-galactosidase and cytochrome oxidase, multi-test identification systems, or equivalent confirmation tests False-
positive and false-negative information is often available in published studies and/or from the manufacturer(s)
  13The Readycult® Coliforms 100 Presence/Absence Test is described in the document, "Readycult® Coliforms 100 Pres-
ence/Absence Test  for Detection and Identification  of Coliform Bacteria and Eschench/a coli in Finished  Waters", November
2000, Version 1 0, available from EM Science (an affiliate of Merck KGgA, Darmstadt Germany), 480  S  Democrat Road,
Gibbstown, NJ 08027-1297 Telephone number is (800) 222-0342, e-mail address is adellenbusch&emscience com
  "Membrane Filter Technique using ChromocultB Coliform Agar is described in the document, "Chromocult® Coliform Aqar
Presence/Absence Membrane Filter Test Method for Detection and Identification of Coliform Bacteria and Eschenchla coli in  Fin-
ished Waters", November 2000, Version 1 0, available from EM Science (an affiliate of Merck KGgA, Darmstadt Germany), 480
S  Democrat  Road,  Gibbstown,  NJ  08027-1297  Telephone  number  is  (800)  222-0342, e-mail  address  is:
adellenbusch@emscience com
  15Colitag® product for the determination of the  presence/absence of total coliforms and E coli is described in "Colitag®
Product as a Test for Detection and Identification of Coliforms and E coli Bacteria in Drinking Water and Source Water as  Re-
quired in National Primary Drinking Water Regulations," August 2001, available from CPI International, Inc , 5580 Skylane Blvd ,
Santa Rosa, CA, 95403, telephone (800) 878-7654,  Fax (707) 545-7901, Internet address  http //www.cpimternational com
  (4) [Reserved]
  (5) Public water  systems  must con-
duct fecal coliform analysis in accord-
ance  with  the   following   procedure.
When the MTF Technique or Presence-
Absence (PA) Coliform Test is used to
test  for total  coliforms, shake the lac-
tose-positive presumptive tube or P-A
vigorously   and  transfer  the  growth
with a sterile 3-mm loop or sterile ap-
plicator stick into  brilliant green lac-
tose  bile  broth and EC medium to de-
termine the presence of total and fecal
coliforms,  respectively.  For  EPA-ap-
proved analytical methods which use a
membrane   filter,  transfer  the  total
coliform-positive  culture by one of the
following methods: remove  the  mem-
brane  containing  the total  coliform
colonies from  the  substrate with a ster-
ile forceps and carefully curl and insert
the membrane into  a tube of EC  me-
dium (the laboratory may first remove
a small portion of selected colonies for
verification),  swab  the  entire  mem-
brane filter surface with a  sterile cot-
ton swab  and  transfer the inoculum to
EC medium (do  not  leave  the  cotton
swab in the EC medium), or inoculate
individual total coliform-positive colo-
nies into EC Medium. Gently shake the
inoculated  tubes of EC medium to in-
sure  adequate mixing and incubate in a
waterbath  at  44.5 ±  0.2  °C for  24 + 2
hours.  Gas production of any amount
in  the  inner fermentation  tube of the
EC medium indicates a  positive fecal
coliform  test.  *The  preparation of EC
medium is  described in  Method  9221E
(paragraph  la) in Standard  Methods for
the Examination of Water and Waste-
water, 18th  edition (1992), 19th edition
(1995), and 20th edition (1998); the cited
method in any one of these three  edi-
tions  may be used. Public  water  sys-
tems need only determine the  presence
or  absence  of fecal coliforms;  a deter-
mination of fecal coliform  density  is
not required.
  (6) Public water  systems  must  con-
duct analysis of Escherichia  coli in ac-
cordance with one of the following ana-
lytical methods:
  (i) EC medium supplemented with  50
Hg/mL of 4-methylumbelliferyl-beta-D-
glucuronide   (MUG) (final  concentra-
tion),  as described  in  Method  9222G  in
Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water  and Wastewater, 19th edition
(1995)  and 20th  edition  (1998). Either
edition may be used. Alternatively, the
18th edition (1992)  may  be  used if  at
least 10 mL of EC medium, as described
in  paragraph  (f)(5)  of this  section,  is
supplemented with 50  jig/mL  of  MUG
before autoclaving.  The inner  inverted
fermentation tube may be omitted.  If
the 18th  edition is used, apply  the pro-
cedure in paragraph (f)(5) of this  sec-
tion for  transferring  a total coliform-
positive culture to  EC medium supple-
mented with MUG, incubate the tube
at 44.5 ± 0.2 °C for 24 ± 2 hours, and then
observe  fluorescence  with   an  ultra-
violet light (366 nm) in the dark. If flu-
orescence is  visible, E. coli are present.
  (ii) Nutrient agar supplemented with
100  ng/mL  of   4-methylumbelliferyl-
beta-D-glucuronide  (MUG) (final  con-
centration),  as   described  in  Method
                                          359

-------
§141.21
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
9222G in Standard Methods for the Ex-
amination of Water and  Wastewater,
19th  edition  (1995)  and  20th edition
(1998). Either edition may be used for
determining if a total coliform-positive
sample, as determined by  a membrane
filter technique, contains E. coli. Al-
ternatively, the 18th edition (1992) may
be  used if the membrane filter con-
taining a total coliform-positive col-
ony(ies) is transferred to nutrient agar,
as  described  in  Method 9221B  (para-
graph 3) of Standard Methods (18th edi-
tion), supplemented with 100  |ig/mL of
MUG. If the  18th edition is used, incu-
bate the agar plate at 35 °C for 4 hours
and then observe the colony(ies) under
ultraviolet light (366 nm) in  the dark
for fluorescence. If fluorescence is visi-
ble, E. coli are present.
  (iii)  Minimal  Medium  ONPG-MUG
(MMO-MUG) Test, as set  forth in the
article "National Field Evaluation of a
Defined Substrate Method for the Si-
multaneous  Detection  of Total  Coli-
forms and Escherichia coli  from Drink-
ing Water: Comparison with Presence-
Absence Techniques" (Edberg et al.),
Applied  and  Environmental  Microbi-
ology, Volume 55, pp.  1003-1008, April
1989. (Note: The  Autoanalysis Colilert
System is an MMO-MUG  test).  If the
MMO-MUG test is total coliform-posi-
tive after a 24-hour incubation, test the
medium for fluorescence with a 366-nm
ultraviolet light (preferably with a 6-
watt lamp) in the dark. If fluorescence
is observed,  the sample is E. coH-posi-
tive.  If fluorescence  is   questionable
(cannot be definitively  read) after 24
hours incubation, incubate the culture
for an additional four hours (but not to
exceed 28 hours total), and again test
the  medium  for   fluorescence. The
MMO-MUG  Test with hepes  buffer in
lieu of phosphate buffer is the only ap-
proved formulation for the detection of
E. coli.
  (iv) The Colisure Test. A description
of the Colisure Test may be obtained
from  the Millipore  Corporation, Tech-
nical  Services Department, 80  Ashby
Road, Bedford, MA 01730.
  (v) The membrane filter  method with
MI agar, a description of which is cited
in footnote 6 to the table in paragraph
(f)(3) of this section.
  (vi) E*Colite® Test, a description of
which  is  cited in  footnote  10  to the
table at paragraph (f)(3) of this section.
  (vii)  m-ColiBlue24®  Test,  a  descrip-
tion of which is cited in footnote 11 to
the table in paragraph (f)(3) of this sec-
tion.
  (viii) Readycult® Coliforms 100 Pres-
ence/Absence  Test, a  description of
which  is  cited in  footnote  13  to the
table at paragraph (f)(3) of this section.
  (ix)  Membrane   Filter   Technique
using  Chromocult® Coliform Agar,  a
description  of which is cited in foot-
note 14 to the table at paragraph (f)(3)
of this section.
  (x) Colitag®, a description of which
is cited in footnote 15 to the table at
paragraph (f)(3) of this section.
  (7)   As   an  option   to   paragraph
(f)(6)(iii) of this section, a system with
a total coliform-positive,  MUG-nega-
tive, MMO-MUG test may further ana-
lyze the culture for the presence of E.
coli by transferring a 0.1 ml,   28-hour
MMO-MUG  culture to EC  Medium  +
MUG with a pipet. The formulation and
incubation conditions of EC Medium +
MUG,  and observation of the  results
are described in paragraph  (f)(6)(i) of
this section.
  (8) The following  materials are incor-
porated by reference in this   section
with the approval of the Director of the
Federal Register in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1  CFR part 51. Copies
of  the analytical   methods  cited in
Standard  Methods for the Examination
of Water  and Wastewater (18th, 19th,
and 20th  editions) may be obtained
from the American Public Health Asso-
ciation et al.; 1015 Fifteenth  Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20005-2605. Copies
of the  MMO-MUG Test, as set  forth in
the article "National Field  Evaluation
of a Defined Substrate Method  for the
Simultaneous Enumeration of Total
Coliforms and Escherichia  coli  from
Drinking  Water:  Comparison with the
Standard  Multiple  Tube Fermentation
Method"  (Edberg  et al.) may  be ob-
tained from the American Water Works
Association Research Foundation, 6666
West Quincy Avenue, Denver, CO 80235.
Copies of the MMO-MUG Test  as set
forth  in  the article  "National Field
Evaluation   of  a  Defined  Substrate
                                     360

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.22
Method  for the  Simultaneous  Enu-
meration of Total Coliforms and Esch-
erichia coli from Drinking Water: Com-
parison  with the  Standard  Multiple
Tube Fermentation Method" (Edberg et
al.) may  be obtained from the Amer-
ican  Water Works  Association  Re-
search Foundation,  6666 West  Quincy
Avenue,  Denver, CO 80235. A descrip-
tion of the Colisure Test may be ob-
tained from the Millipore Corp., Tech-
nical Services Department, 80 Ashby
Road, Bedford, MA 01730. Copies may be
inspected  at  EPA's Drinking Water
Docket;  401 M  St.,  SW.;  Washing-ton,
DC 20460, or at  the  National Archives
and  Records Administration (NARA).
For information on  the availability  of
this  material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030,  or  go to:  http://www.archives.gov/
federal	register/
code	of ^federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (g) Response to violation. (1) A public
water system which has exceeded the
MCL for total coliforms in §141.63 must
report the  violation to the  State  no
later than the end of the next business
day after it learns of the violation, and
notify the  public in accordance  with
subpart Q.
  (2) A public water system which has
failed to comply with a coliform moni-
toring requirement, including the sani-
tary survey requirement,  must report
the monitoring  violation to the State
within ten  days after the system  dis-
covers the violation,  and notify  the
public in accordance with subpart Q.
[54 FR 27562, June 29, 1989, as amended at 54
FR 30001,  July 17,  1989; 55 FR 25064,  June 19,
1990; 56 FR 642, Jan. 8,  1991; 57 FR 1852, Jan.
15, 1992;  57 FR 24747, June 10, 1992; 59 FR
62466, Dec. 5, 1994;  60 FR 34085, June 29, 1995;
64 FR 67461, Dec. 1, 1999; 65 FR 26022, May 4,
2000; 67 FR 65246,  Oct.  23,  2002; 67 FR  65896,
Oct. 29, 2002; 69 FR 7160, Feb. 13, 2004]

§141.22   Turbidity sampling and  ana-
   lytical requirements.
  The  requirements  in  this  section
apply to  unfiltered  systems until  De-
cember  30,  1991, unless the  State  has
determined prior to  that date, in writ-
ing pursuant to section 1412(b)(7)(iii),
that filtration is required. The require-
ments in this section apply to filtered
systems  until June  29, 1993. The re-
quirements in  this  section  apply  to
unfiltered systems that the State has
determined, in writing pursuant to sec-
tion 1412(b)(7)(C)(iii), must install fil-
tration, until June 29, 1993, or until fil-
tration is installed, whichever is later.
  (a)  Samples shall be taken by  sup-
pliers of water for both community and
non-community  water systems  at  a
representative entry  point(s)  to the
water distribution system at least once
per day,  for  the  purposes of making
turbidity  measurements to  determine
compliance with §141.13.  If  the State
determines  that a reduced  sampling
frequency in a non-community will not
pose a risk to public health, it can re-
duce the required sampling frequency.
The option of reducing the  turbidity
frequency  shall be permitted only in
those public water systems that prac-
tice disinfection and which  maintain
an  active residual disinfectant in the
distribution system, and in those cases
where  the State has indicated in  writ-
ing that no unreasonable risk to health
existed under the circumstances of this
option. Turbidity measurements  shall
be made as directed in §141.74(a)(l).
  (b) If the result of a turbidity  anal-
ysis indicates that the  maximum al-
lowable limit has  been  exceeded, the
sampling  and  measurement  shall  be
confirmed  by resampling  as  soon as
practicable  and preferably within one
hour.  If  the  repeat  sample  confirms
that the maximum allowable limit has
been  exceeded,  the supplier  of water
shall  report to  the  State  within 48
hours. The repeat sample  shall be the
sample used for the  purpose  of calcu-
lating the  monthly average.  If the
monthly  average of the daily samples
exceeds the maximum allowable limit,
or if the average of two samples taken
on consecutive days exceeds 5 TU, the
supplier of water shall report to the
State and notify the public as directed
in §§141.31 and subpart Q.
  (c)   Sampling  for  non-community
water  systems shall  begin within two
years after the effective date of  this
part.
  (d) The  requirements of this §141.22
shall  apply only to public water  sys-
tems   which  use   water   obtained  in
whole  or in part from surface sources.
  (e) The State has the authority to de-
termine compliance or initiate enforce-
ment action based upon analytical re-
sults or other information  compiled by
                                     361

-------
§141.23
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
their sanctioned  representatives  and
agencies.

[40 FR 59570, Dec. 24, 1975, as amended at 45
PR 57344, Aug. 27, 1980; 47 FR 8998, Mar. 3,
1982;  47 FR 10998, Mar. 12, 1982; 54 FR 27527,
June 29, 1989; 59 FR 62466, Dec. 5, 1994; 65 FR
26022, May 4, 2000]

§141.23 Inorganic  chemical sampling
   and analytical requirements.
  Community water systems shall con-
duct monitoring to  determine compli-
ance with the  maximum contaminant
levels specified in §141.62 in accordance
with this section. Non-transient, non-
community water  systems shall con-
duct monitoring to  determine compli-
ance with the  maximum contaminant
levels specified in §141.62 in accordance
with this section.  Transient, non-com-
munity water  systems  shall conduct
monitoring  to determine compliance
with the nitrate and nitrite  maximum
contaminant  levels  in  §§141.11  and
141.62  (as appropriate) in accordance
with this section.
  (a) Monitoring shall be conducted as
follows:
  (1) Groundwater systems shall take a
minimum of one sample at every entry
point to the distribution system which
is representative  of each  well after
treatment (hereafter called a sampling
point)  beginning in the initial compli-
ance  period. The  system shall  take
each  sample  at  the same  sampling
point unless  conditions make another
sampling point more representative of
each source or treatment plant.
  (2) Surface water systems shall take
a minimum  of one  sample at  every
entry point to  the distribution system
after any application of treatment or
in the distribution system at a point
which is representative of each source
after  treatment  (hereafter called  a
sampling  point) beginning  in the  ini-
tial  compliance period.  The  system
shall  take each sample  at the same
sampling point unless conditions make
another  sampling  point  more  rep-
resentative of each source or treatment
plant.
  NOTE: For purposes of this paragraph, sur-
face water systems include systems with a
combination of surface and ground sources.
  (3) If a  system draws  water from
more than one source and the sources
are combined before distribution,  the
system must sample at an entry point
to the distribution system during peri-
ods of  normal  operating  conditions
(i.e., when water is representative of
all sources being used).
  (4) The  State may reduce the total
number  of  samples  which must  be
analyzed  by   allowing   the  use  of
compositing. Composite  samples from
a maximum of  five samples  are  al-
lowed,   provided  that  the  detection
limit of the method used for analysis is
less  than  one-fifth  of   the   MCL.
Compositing of samples must be done
in the laboratory.
  (i) If the concentration in the com-
posite sample is greater than or equal
to one-fifth of  the MCL  of any inor-
ganic  chemical, then a follow-up sam-
ple must  be taken within  14 days at
each sampling  point included  in  the
composite. These samples must be ana-
lyzed  for  the  contaminants which ex-
ceeded  one-fifth of the  MCL in  the
composite sample. Detection limits for
each analytical method and MCLs for
each inorganic contaminant are  the
following:
                   DETECTION LIMITS FOR INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS
Contaminant
Antimony . 	



Arsenic



Asbestos 	
Barium . ...


Beryllium . . .

MCL (mo/1)
0006



0.0106 ..



7MFL1
2 .


0.004

Methodology
Atomic Absorption, Furnace .
Atomic Absorption, Platform
ICP-Mass Spectrometry
Hydride-Atomic Absorption
Atomic Absorption, Furnace 	 	
Atomic Absorption, Platform — Stabilized Temperature . .
Atomic Absorption, Gaseous Hydride
ICP-Mass Spectrometry 	 	
Transmission Electron Microscopy 	 ...
Atomic Absorption, furnace technique . .. .
Atomic Absorption, direct aspiration 	 ....
Inductively Coupled Plasma 	
Atomic Absorption, Furnace 	 ....
Atomic Absorption; Platform
Detection limit

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                §141.23
                DETECTION LIMITS FOR INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS—Continued
Contaminant


Cadmium

Chromium

Cyanide





Mercury 	

Nickel



Nitrate ...




Nitrite 	



Selenium ....

Thallium 	


MCL (mg/l)


0005

01

02





0 002 .. .

xl .



10 (as N)




1 (as N)



005

0002


Methodology
Inductively Coupled Plasma2
ICP-Mass Spectrometry ..
Atomic Absorption, furnace technique
Inductively Coupled Plasma ....
Atomic Absorption; furnace technique
Inductively Coupled Plasma
Distillation, Spectrophotometric3 . . .
Distillation, Automated, Spectrophotometric3
Distillation Amenable Spectrophotometric 4
Distillation, Selective Electrode3 . . 	
UV, Distillation, Spectrophotometric .. .
Distillation, Spectrophotometric .
Manual Cold Vapor Technique
Automated Cold Vapor Technique . ...
Atomic Absorption, Furnace . . ,
Atomic Absorption, Platform
Inductively Coupled Plasma2 .... ....
ICP-Mass Spectrometry 	
Manual Cadmium Reduction
Automated Hydrazme Reduction . . .
Automated Cadmium Reduction . . . 	
Ion Selective Electrode 	
Ion Chromatography ... . ...
Spectrophotometric . . . . 	
Automated Cadmium Reduction
Manual Cadmium Reduction
Ion Chromatography
Atomic Absorption; furnace .. .
Atomic Absorption, gaseous hydride . 	
Atomic Absorption, Furnace
Atomic Absorption, Platform
ICP-Mass Spectrometry . . ...
Detection limit
(mg/l)
00003
00003
00001
0.001
0001
0007(0001)
002
0005
0.02
005
00005
0.0006
00002
00002
0.001
000065
0005
00005
001
001
005
1
001
001
005
001
0004
0002
0002
0001
00007 =
00003
  1 MFL = million fibers per liter >10 urn
  2 Using a 2X preconcentration step as noted  in Method  200.7.  Lower  MDLs may be achieved when using  a 4X
preconcentration
  3 Screening method for total cyanides
  4 Measures "free" cyanides.
  5 Lower MDLs are reported using stabilized temperature graphite furnace atomic absorption.
  6 The value for arsenic is effective January 23, 2006 Unit then, the MCL is 0 05 mg/L.
  7 The MDL reported for EPA method 2009 (Atomic Absorption; Platform—Stablized Temperature) was determined using a 2x
concentration step during sample digestion  The MDL determined for samples analyzed using direct analyses (i e., no sample di-
gestion) will be higher Using multiple depositions, EPA 200 9 is capable of obtaining MDL of 0 0001 mg/L
  8 Using selective ion monitoring, EPA Method 200 8 (ICP-MS) is capable of obtaining a MDL of 0 0001 mg/L.
  (ii) If the  population  served by the
system    is   >3,300   persons,    then
compositing  may only be permitted by
the  State at sampling points  within a
single system. In systems serving <3,300
persons,   the    State   may   permit
compositing  among different  systems
provided the 5-sample  limit  is  main-
tained.
  (iii) If duplicates of the original sam-
ple  taken  from each sampling  point
used in the composite sample are  avail-
able, the system may use these instead
of resampling. The  duplicates must be
analyzed and the results reported to
the  State  within  14 days after   com-
pleting- analysis of the composite sam-
ple,  provided the holding time of the
sample is not exceeded.
  (5)  The  frequency  of monitoring for
asbestos  shall be  in accordance  with
paragraph (b) of this section: the fre-
quency of monitoring for antimony, ar-
senic,  barium,   beryllium,  cadmium,
chromium, cyanide,  fluoride, mercury,
nickel, selenium and thallium shall be
in  accordance with  paragraph  (c) of
this  section;  the  frequency  of moni-
toring  for nitrate  shall be in  accord-
ance  with paragraph (d) of this section;
and the frequency of monitoring for ni-
trite  shall be  in  accordance with para-
graph (e) of this section.
  (b)  The frequency of monitoring con-
ducted  to determine compliance  with
the maximum contaminant  level for
asbestos specified in §141.62(b) shall be
conducted as follows:
                                        363

-------
§141.23
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (1) Each community and  non-tran-
sient, non-community water  system is
required to monitor for asbestos during
the first three-year compliance- period
of each nine-year compliance cycle be-
ginning in the compliance period start-
ing January 1, 1993.
  (2) If the system believes  it is not
vulnerable  to either asbestos contami-
nation in its  source  water or due  to
corrosion  of asbestos-cement pipe,  or
both, it may apply to the State  for a
waiver of the monitoring requirement
in paragraph (b)(l) of this section. If
the State grants the waiver, the sys-
tem is not required to monitor.
  (3) The  State may  grant  a waiver
based on  a consideration of the fol-
lowing factors:
  (i) Potential asbestos contamination
of the water source, and
  (ii) The use of asbestos-cement pipe
for finished water distribution and the
corrosive nature of the water.
  (4) A  waiver remains in effect  until
the completion of the three-year com-
pliance period. Systems not receiving a
waiver  must  monitor  in accordance
with the provisions of paragraph  (b)(l)
of this section.
  (5) A  system vulnerable to asbestos
contamination due  solely to  corrosion
of asbestos-cement pipe shall take one
sample at a tap served by asbestos-ce-
ment pipe and under  conditions where
asbestos contamination is most likely
to occur.
  (6) A  system vulnerable to asbestos
contamination  due  solely to source
water shall monitor in accordance with
the provision  of paragraph (a) of this
section.
  (7) A  system vulnerable to asbestos
contamination due  both to its source
water supply and corrosion of asbestos-
cement pipe shall take one sample at a
tap served by asbestos-cement pipe and
under conditions where  asbestos  con-
tamination is most likely to occur.
  (8) A system which  exceeds the max-
imum  contaminant  levels  as  deter-
mined in §141.23(1) of this section shall
monitor quarterly  beginning  in the
next  quarter  after the  violation oc-
curred.
  (9) The State may decrease the  quar-
terly monitoring requirement to the
frequency specified in paragraph  (b)(l)
of this section provided  the  State has
determined that the system is reliably
and consistently below the maximum
contaminant level. In no  case  can a
State make this determination  unless
a groundwater  system takes a min-
imum of two quarterly samples and a
surface  (or  combined surface/ground)
water system takes a minimum of four
quarterly samples.
  (10) If monitoring data collected after
January  1,  1990  are generally con-
sistent   with   the  requirements  of
§141.23(b), then  the State may allow
systems to use that data to satisfy the
monitoring requirement for the  initial
compliance  period  beginning  January
1, 1993.
  (c) The frequency of monitoring con-
ducted to determine compliance with
the maximum  contaminant  levels in
§141.62 for antimony, arsenic, barium,
beryllium,  cadmium, chromium, cya-
nide,  fluoride,  mercury, nickel, sele-
nium and thallium shall be as follows:
  (1) Groundwater  systems shall take
one sample at each sampling point dur-
ing each compliance  period. Surface
water systems  (or combined surface/
ground) shall take one sample annually
at each sampling point.
  (2) The system  may  apply  to the
State for a waiver from the monitoring
frequencies specified in paragraph (c)(l)
of this  section.  States  may  grant a
public water system a waiver for moni-
toring  of cyanide, provided that the
State determines  that  the system  is
not vulnerable  due to lack of any  in-
dustrial source of cyanide.
  (3) A condition of the waiver shall re-
quire that a system shall take a min-
imum of  one sample while the waiver is
effective. The term during which the
waiver is effective shall not exceed one
compliance cycle (i.e., nine years).
  (4) The State may grant a waiver pro-
vided surface water systems have mon-
itored annually for at least three years
and  groundwater  systems  have con-
ducted a minimum of three rounds  of
monitoring.  (At least one sample shall
have been taken since January 1, 1990).
Both surface and groundwater systems
shall demonstrate that all previous an-
alytical results were less than the max-
imum contaminant level. Systems that
use a new water source are not eligible
                                    364

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.23
for a waiver until three rounds of mon-
itoring from the new source have been
completed.
  (5) In determining the appropriate re-
duced monitoring frequency, the State
shall consider:
  (i) Reported concentrations from all
previous monitoring;
  (ii)  The  degree  of  variation in re-
ported concentrations;  and
  (iii) Other factors which may affect
contaminant concentrations such as
changes in groundwater pumping rates,
changes in the system's configuration,
changes in the system's operating pro-
cedures, or changes in stream flows or
characteristics.
  (6) A decision by the  State to grant a
waiver shall be  made in writing  and
shall set forth the basis  for the deter-
mination. The determination may be
initiated by the State  or upon an appli-
cation by the public water system.  The
public water system shall  specify the
basis  for its request.  The  State shall
review and, where appropriate,  revise
its determination of  the  appropriate
monitoring frequency  when the system
submits new monitoring  data or when
other data relevant to the system's ap-
propriate   monitoring  frequency  be-
come available.
  (7) Systems which exceed the max-
imum contaminant levels as calculated
in §141.23(1) of this section shall mon-
itor quarterly beginning in the next
quarter after the violation occurred.
  (8) The State may decrease the quar-
terly  monitoring requirement  to  the
frequencies specified  in  paragraphs
(c)(l) and (c)(2) of this section provided
it has determined that the system is
reliably  and consistently  below  the
maximum  contaminant  level.  In  no
case can a State make this determina-
tion  unless a  groundwater   system
takes a minimum of two quarterly
samples  and a surface water  system
takes a  minimum of four quarterly
samples.
  (9) All new systems or systems that
use a new source of water that begin
operation after January  22, 2004 must
demonstrate compliance with the MCL
within a period of time specified by the
State. The  system must also comply
with the  initial sampling  frequencies
specified by the State  to ensure a  sys-
tem can demonstrate  compliance with
the MCL. Routine and increased moni-
toring frequencies shall  be conducted
in accordance with the requirements in
this section.
  (d) All public water systems (commu-
nity;  non-transient,  non-community;
and  transient,  non-community sys-
tems) shall monitor to determine com-
pliance  with the maximum contami-
nant level for nitrate in §141.62.
  (1)  Community  and  non-transient,
non-community  water systems served
by groundwater  systems  shall monitor
annually beginning  January  1,  1993;
systems served by surface  water shall
monitor quarterly beginning January
1, 1993.
  (2)  For  community and non-tran-
sient, non-community water systems,
the repeat  monitoring  frequency for
groundwater systems shall  be quar-
terly  for at least one year following
any  one sample in  which  the con-
centration is >50 percent of the MCL.
The  State  may allow a groundwater
system  to  reduce  the  sampling  fre-
quency to annually after four consecu-
tive quarterly samples are reliably and
consistently less than the MCL.
  (3)  For  community and non-tran-
sient, non-community water systems,
the State may allow a surface water
system  to  reduce  the  sampling  fre-
quency to annually if all  analytical re-
sults  from  four consecutive quarters
are <50 percent of the MCL. A  surface
water system shall return to quarterly
monitoring  if any one sample is £50
percent of the MCL.
  (4)  Each  transient non-community
water system  shall monitor annually
beginning January 1, 1993.
  (5) After  the initial round of quar-
terly sampling is completed, each com-
munity and  non-transient non-commu-
nity system which is monitoring annu-
ally shall take subsequent samples dur-
ing the quarter(s) which previously re-
sulted in the highest analytical result.
  (e) All public water systems (commu-
nity;  non-transient,  non-community;
and  transient,  non-community sys-
tems) shall monitor to determine com-
pliance  with the maximum contami-
nant level for nitrite in §141.62(b).
  (1) All public water  systems  shall
take  one  sample at  each  sampling
                                    365

-------
§141.23
         40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
point in the compliance period begin-
ning January 1, 1993 and ending Decem-
ber 31, 1995.
  (2) After the initial sample, systems
where an analytical result for nitrite is
<50 percent  of the MCL shall monitor
at the frequency specified by the State.
  (3)  For community,  non-transient,
non-community,  and  transient  non-
community  water systems, the repeat
monitoring  frequency for any water
system  shall be quarterly for at least
one year following any one sample  in
which the concentration is >50 percent
of the MCL.  The State may allow a sys-
tem to  reduce the sampling frequency
to annually  after determining the sys-
tem is  reliably and consistently less
than the MCL.
  (4) Systems which are monitoring an-
nually shall  take each subsequent sam-
ple during  the  quarter(s)  which  pre-
viously  resulted in the highest analyt-
ical result.
  (f) Confirmation samples:
  (1) Where  the results of sampling for
antimony, arsenic, asbestos,  barium,
beryllium, cadmium,  chromium, cya-
nide,  fluoride,  mercury, nickel, sele-
nium or thallium indicate an exceed-
ance  of the  maximum contaminant
level, the State may  require that one
additional sample be collected as soon
as possible after the initial sample was
taken (but not to exceed two weeks)  at
the same sampling point.
  (2) Where  nitrate or nitrite sampling
results  indicate an exceedance of the
maximum contaminant level,  the sys-
tem shall take a confirmation sample
within 24 hours of the system's receipt
of notification of the analytical results
of the first  sample. Systems unable  to
comply  with the 24-hour sampling re-
quirement   must  immediately  notify
persons  served by the public water sys-
tem in  accordance with  §141.202 and
meet other  Tier 1  public notification
requirements under Subpart Q of this
part.  Systems  exercising this option
must take and analyze a confirmation
sample  within  two weeks of  notifica-
tion of  the  analytical  results of the
first sample.
  (3) If  a State-required confirmation
sample  is taken for any contaminant,
then  the results of  the initial  and
confirmation sample shall be averaged.
The resulting average shall be used  to
determine the system's compliance in
accordance with paragraph  (i)  of  this
section. States have the discretion to
delete  results of obvious sampling er-
rors.
  (g) The State may require more fre-
quent  monitoring  than  specified in
paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and  (e)  of  this
section or may require confirmation
samples for positive and  negative re-
sults at its discretion.
  (h) Systems may apply to the State
to conduct more frequent monitoring
than  the minimum  monitoring  fre-
quencies specified in this section.
  (i)  Compliance   with  §§141.11  or
141.62(b) (as appropriate) shall be deter-
mined  based on the analytical result(s)
obtained at each sampling point.
  (1) For systems which are conducting
monitoring at a frequency greater than
annual, compliance with the maximum
contaminant  levels for antimony,  ar-
senic, asbestos, barium, beryllium, cad-
mium, chromium,  cyanide, fluoride,
mercury, nickel, selenium or thallium
is determined by a running annual av-
erage at any  sampling point. If the av-
erage at any  sampling point is  greater
than the MCL, then the system is out
of compliance. If any one sample would
cause the annual average to be  exceed-
ed,  then  the  system is out  of  compli-
ance immediately.  Any sample below
the method  detection limit shall be
calculated at  zero for the purposse of de-
termining the annual average. If a sys-
tem fails to collect the required num-
ber of samples,  compliance (average
concentration) will be  based  on  the
total number of samples collected.
  (2) For systems which are monitoring
annually,  or  less frequently, the  sys-
tem is out of  compliance with the max-
imum  contaminant levels  for  anti-
mony,  arsenic, asbestos, barium, beryl-
lium,   cadmium,  chromium, cyanide,
fluoride, mercury, nickel, selenium or
thallium if the level of a contaminant
is greater than the MCL. If confirma-
tion samples  are required by the State,
the determination  of compliance  will
be based on the  annual average of the
initial MCL exceedance and  any State-
required  confirmation  samples.  If a
system fails   to collect  the required
number of samples, compliance (aver-
age concentration) will be based on the
total number  of samples collected.
                                    366

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.23
  (3) Compliance  with the maximum
contaminant levels for nitrate and ni-
trate is determined based on one sam-
ple if the levels of these contaminants
are below the MCLs. If the levels of ni-
trate and/or nitrite exceed the MCLs in
the initial sample, a confirmation sam-
ple is required in accordance with para-
graph (f)(2) of this section, and compli-
ance shall be determined based on the
average of the initial and confirmation
samples.
  (4) Arsenic sampling results will  be
reported to the nearest 0.001 mg/L.
  (j) Each public  water system shall
monitor at the time designated by the
State during each compliance period.
  (k) Inorganic analysis:
  (1) Analysis  for the following  con-
taminants shall be  conducted  in  ac-
cordance with the methods in  the fol-
lowing table, or their equivalent as de-
termined  by  EPA.  Criteria  for  ana-
lyzing arsenic, barium, beryllium, cad-
mium,  calcium,  chromium,  copper,
lead,  nickel,  selenium,   sodium,  and
thallium  with  digestion  or directly
without digestion, and other analytical
test procedures are contained in Tech-
nical Notes on Drinking Water Methods,
EPA-600/R-94-1Y3,  October  1994.  This
document also contains approved  ana-
lytical  test   methods which  remain
available  for   compliance monitoring
until  July 1, 1996. These  methods will
not be available for use  after July 1,
1996. This document is available from
the National   Technical  Information
Service,  NTIS  PB95-104766,  U.S.  De-
partment   of   Commerce,  5285   Port
Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
The toll-free number is 800-553-6847.
Contaminant and
methodology13
1 Alkalinity
Titnmetnc 	 ... .

Electrometric titration

2 Antimony
Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP)— Mass Spec-
trometry
Hydnde-Atomic Absorption
Atomic Absorption, Platform
Atomic Absorption, Furnace .
3 Arsenic 14
Inductively Coupled Plasma 15
ICP-Mass Spectrometry 	 	
Atomic Absorption; Platform 	
Atomic Absorption, Furnace 	

Hydride Atomic Absorption

4 Asbestos
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Transmission Electron Microscopy 	
5 Barium
Inductively Coupled Plasma
ICP-Mass Spectrometry
Atomic Absorption, Direct . .
Atomic Absorption, Furnace .
6 Beryllium
Inductively Coupled Plasma
ICP-Mass Spectrometry
Atomic Absorption, Platform
Atomic Absorption, Furnace

7 Cadmium
Inductively Coupled Plasma
ICP-Mass Spectrometry
Atomic Absorption, Platform
Atomic Absorption, Furnace
8 Calcium.
EDTA titnmetric .

Atomic Absorption, Direct Aspiration

Inductively Coupled Plasma
9 Chromium
EPA






200 B2


200 9 2


200 72 . ..
zoo a2
200 S2





100 19
100210

200 7 2
200 82



200 7 2
200 8 2
200 9 2



20072
200 8 2
200 9 2






200 7 2

ASTM3

D1067—
92B





D3697-92






D2972-
97C
D2972-
97B












D3645—
97B






D511—
93A
D511—
93B


SM<
(18th, 19th
ed)

2320 B ,








3113 B

3120 B .


3113 B

3114B





3120 B

3111 D
3113 B

3120B


3113 B





3113 B

3500-Ca
D
3111 B

3120B

SM"
(20th ed )

2320 B










3120 B










3120 B




3120B










3500-Ca B



3120 B

Other



1-1030-
85 =








































                                    367

-------
§141.23
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant and
methodology13
Inductively Coupled Plasma
ICP-Mass Spectrometry 	
Atomic Absorption. Platform
Atomic Absorption, Furnace
10 Copper:
Atomic Absorption, Furnace 	

Atomic Absorption; Direct Aspiration 	

Inductively Coupled Plasma 	
ICP-Mass spectrometry ... 	
Atomic Absorption Platform
11 Conductivity:
Conductance

12 Cyanide-
Manual Distillation followed by 	

Spectrophotometric Manual ..

Specttophotomelric Semi-automated
Spectrophotometnc, Amenable 	

Selective Electrode 	

UV/Distillation/Spectrophotometric .. .

Distillation/Spectrophotometnc . 	



13 Fluoride.
Ion Chromatography 	 	
Manual Distill , Color. SPADNS 	

Manual Electrode 	 ... . .

Automated Electrode ... . ...

Automated Alizarin 	

14 Lead
Atomic Absorption; Furnace ..

ICP-Mass spectrometry 	 	
Atomic Absorption; Platform .
Differential Pulss Anodic Stripping Voltammetry

15 Magnesium:
Atomic Absorption 	
ICP 	 	
Complexation Titnmetnc Methods 	

16 Mercury
Manual, Cold Vapor
Automated, Cold Vapor 	 	
ICP-Mass Spectrometry 	
17. Nickel
Inductively Coupled Plasma . .
ICP-Mass Spectrometry ...
Atomic Absorption; Platform 	
Atomic Absorption, Direct .
Atomic Absorption, Furnace ..
18. Nitrate
Ion Chromatography 	 	
Automated Cadmium Reduction ...

Ion Selective Electrode .. .

Manual Cadmium Reduction 	

19 Nitrite
EPA
200.72 ....
200 82
200 92






200 72 ..
200 82
200.92.








335 46











3000s











200 82
200 92




200 72



245 12
24521.
200 82

200 7 2
200 82.
200 92



300 O6 ...
3532s






ASTM3





D1688-
95C.
D1688-
95A




D1125-
95A

D2036-
98A
D2036-
98A

D2036-
98B









D4327-97


D1179-
93B





D3559-
96D.





D511-93B

D511-93 A


D3223-97









D4327-97
D3867-
90A


D3867-
90B

SM«
(18th, 19th
ed)
3120 B


3113 B

3113 B

3111 B

3120B



2510 B


4500-CN-
C.
4500-CN-
E.

4500-CN-
G
4500-CN-
F.







4110 B . .
4500-F-
B,D
4500-F-
C


4500-F-
E

3113B.






3111 B
3120 B .
3500-Mg
E.

3112 B



3120 B


3111 B
3113 B

4110 B .
4500-
NO,- F
4500-
N03- D
4500-
NO,- E.

SM"
(20th ed )
3120 B








3120 B.



2510 B


4500-CN-
C
4500-CN-
E.

4500-CN-
G
4500-CN-
F







4110 B
4500-F-
B,D
4500-F-
C.


4500-F-
E









3120 B.
3500-Mg
B





3120 B





4110 B ....
4500-
NO,- F
4500-
NO,- D
4500-
NO3- E.

Other


















I-3300-
85 5





Kelada
01"
QuikChem
10-204-
00-1-
X18






380-
75WE"
29-71 W"






Method
1001 16
















B-10118


601 7




                                  368

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
§141.23
Contaminant and
methodology13
Ion Chromatography . .
Automated Cadmium Reduction

Manual Cadmium Reduction

Spectrophotometric

20 Ortho-phosphate 12
Colonmetrtc, Automated, Ascorbic Acid . . .
Colorimetnc, ascorbic acid, single reagent
Colonmetric Phosphomolybdate;

Automated-segmented Flow, . .

Automated Discrete . ...

Ion Chromatography ..
21 pH.
Electrometric ....


22 Selenium
Hydride-Atomic Absorption . .

ICP-Mass Spectrometry 	 	
Atomic Absorption, Platform . 	
Atomic Absorption, Furnace

23 Silica
Colonmetric, Molybdate Blue; . ...

Automated-segmented Flow

Colonmetric . . 	
Molybdosilicate . . . 	

Heteropoly Blue

Automated for Molybdate-reactive Silica 	

Inductively Coupled Plasma 	
24 Sodium
Inductively Coupled Plasma ....
Atomic Absorption, Direct Aspiration .
25 Temperature
Thermometric
26 Thallium
ICP-Mass Spectrometry . .
Atomic Absorption; Platform
EPA
300 O6 .
35326






365 16







300 O6 ..

150.11

15021



200 8 2
200 9 2














200 7 2

20072




200 8 2
200.9 2.
ASTM3
D4327-97
D3867-
90A
D3867-
90B




D515-88A






D4327-97

D 1293-95



D3859-
98A.


D3859-
98B.





D859-95















SM4
(18th, 19th
ed.)
4110 B
4500-
NO3-
4500-
NO,- E
4500-
NO2~ B

4500-P F
4500-P E






4110B

4500-H-1-
B


3114 B



3113 B.







4500-Sl D

4500-Si E

4500-Si F

3120 B


3111 B

2550 .



SM4
(20th ed )
4110 B
4500-
NOi~ F
4500-
NOi~ E
4500-
N02~ B

4500-P F
4500-P E.






4110 B

4500-H +
B














4500-SiO2
C
4500-SlO3
D
4500-SlO,
E
3120 B




2550



Other
B-10118









1-1601-
85 5
1-2601-
90s
I-2598-
85s













1-1700-
85 5
I-2700-
85 =
















  The procedures shall be done in accordance with the documents listed below The incorporation by reference of the following
documents listed in footnotes 1-11 and 16 was  approved by the  Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U S C
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 Copies of the documents may be obtained from the sources listed below  Information regarding ob-
taining these documents can be obtained from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 800-426-4791  Documents may be inspected
at EPA'sDrinkmg Water Docket, EPA West,  1301  Constitution Avenue, NW, Room B135, Washington,  DC (Telephone 202-
566-2426), or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741 -6030, or go to  http://www archives gov/federal_register/code_of_federal  regulations/ibr  locations html
  1 "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes*, EPA/600/4-79/020, March 1983  Available at NTIS, PB84-128677
  2 "Methods for the Determination of Metals in  Environmental Samples—Supplement I", EPA/600/R-94/111, May 1994. Avail-
able at NTIS, PB95-125472
  3 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994,  1996, or 1999, Vols 11.01 and 11 02, ASTM International, any year containing the
cited version of the method may be  used  The previous  versions  of D1688-95A, D1688-95C (copper),  D3559-95D (lead),
D1293-95 (pH), D1125-91A (conductivity) and  D859-94 (silica) are also  approved These previous versions D1688-90A, C,
D3559-90D,  D1293-84, D1125-91A and 0859-88, respectively are located in the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994, Vol
11 01  Copies may be obtained from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428
  4Standard  Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition (1992),  19th edition  (1995), or 20th edition
(1998) American Public Health Association,  1015 Fifteenth  Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005 The cited methods published in
any of these  three editions may be used, except that the versions of 3111 B,  3111  D, 3113 B and 3114 B in the 20th edition
may not  be used
  5 Method 1-2601-90, Methods for Analysis by the U S Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory—Determination of
Inorganic and Organic Constituents in Water and Fluvial Sediment, Open File Report 93-125, 1993, For  Methods  1-1030-85, I-
1601-85, 1-1700-85, I-2598-85, I-2700-85, and I-3300-85 See Techniques of Water Resources Investigation of the U S Geo-
logical Survey,  Book 5, Chapter A-1, 3rd ed ,  1989, Available  from Information Services, U S Geological Survey, Federal Cen-
ter, Box  25286, Denver, CO 80225-0425
  6 "Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environmental Samples", EPA/600/R-93/100, August 1993  Avail-
able at NTIS, PB94-120821.
                                                     369

-------
§141.23
             40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
  7The procedure shall be done in accordance with the Technical Bulletin 601 "Standard Method of Test for Nitrate in Drinking
Water", July 1994, PN 221890-001, Analytical Technology, Inc Copies may be obtained from ATI Orion, 529 Mam Street, Bos-
ton, MA 02129
  8 Method B-1011,  "Waters Test  Method for Determination of Nitnte/Nitrate  in Water Using Single Column Ion Chroma-
tography," August 1987 Copies may be obtained from Waters Corporation, Technical Services Division, 34 Maple Street, Mil-
ford, MA 01757
  9 Method 1001, "Analytical Method For Determination  of Asbestos Fibers in Water", EPA/600/4-83/043, EPA, September
1983 Available at NTIS, PB83-260471.
  '"Method 1002, "Determination of Asbestos Structure  Over 10um In Length In Drinking Water", EPA/600/R-94/134,  June
1994 Available at NTIS, PB94-201902
  11 Industrial Method No. 129-71W, "Fluoride in Water and Wastewater", December 1972, and Method No 380-75WE, "Fluo-
ride in Water and Wastewater", February 1976, Techmcon Industrial Systems  Copies  may  be  obtained from Bran & Luebbe,
1025 Busch Parkway, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
  12Unfiltered, no digestion or hydrolysis
  "Because MDLs reported in EPA Methods 200 7 and 200 9 were determined using a  2X preconcentration step during sample
digestion, MOLs determined when samples are analyzed by direct analysis (i e , no sample digestion) will be higher  For direct
analysis  of cadmium  and arsenic by Method 2007, and arsenic by Method  3120  B sample preconcentration using pneumatic
nebuhzation may be required to achieve lower detection limits Preconcentration may also be required for direct analysis of anti-
mony,  lead, and thallium by  Method 2009, antimony and lead by Method 3113 B; and lead by Method D3559-90D unless mul-
tiple in-furnace depositions are  made
  14 If  ultrasonic nebulization is used in the determination of arsenic by Methods 200 7,  200.8, or SM 3120 B, the arsenic must
be in the pertavalent state to  provide uniform signal response. For methods 200 7 and 3120 B, both  samples and standards
must be  diluted  in the same mixed acid matrix concentration of nitric and hydrochloric acid with the addition of 100 (jL of 30%
hydrogen peroxide per 100ml of solution  For direct analysis of arsenic with method 200  8 using ultrasonic nebuhzation, samples
and standards must contain one mg/L of sodium hypochlonte
  "Starting January  23, 2006,  analytical methods using the ICP-AES technology, may not be used because the detection limits
for these methods are 0 008 mg/L or higher This restriction means that the two ICP-AES methods (EPA Method 200.7 and SM
3120 B)  approved for use for the MCL of 005 mg/L  may not be used for compliance determinations for the revised MCL of
0010  mg/L  However, prior to January 23, 2006,  systems may have compliance  samples analyzed with these less sensitive
methods
  16The description for Method Number 1001 for lead is available from Palmiest, LTD, 21 Kenton Lands Road, P O. Box 18395,
Erlanger, KY 41018 Or from the Hach Company, P O.  Box 389, Loveland, CO 80539
  17The description for the Kelada 01 Method, "Kelada Automated Test Methods for Total Cyanide, Acid  Dissociable Cyanide,
And Thiocyanate", Revision  1 2, August 2001, EPA # 821-B-01-009 for cyanide is available from the National Technical Infor-
mation Service (NTIS), PB 2001-108275, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield,  VA 22161  The  toll free telephone number is 800-
553-6847
  18The description  for the QuikChem  Method 10-204-00-1-X, "Digestion and  distillation of total cyanide in drinking and
wastewaters using MICRO DIST and determination of  cyanide by flow injection analysis", Revision 2 1,  November 30, 2000 for
cyanide is available from Lachat Instruments, 6645 W Mill Rd , Milwaukee, Wl 53218, USA Phone 414-358-4200
   (2)  Sample  collection  for  antimony,
arsenic,  asbestos,  barium,  beryllium,
cadmium, chromium, cyanide, fluoride,
mercury,  nickel,  nitrate,  nitrite, sele-
nium,  and thallium  under this  section
shall  be conducted  using the  sample
preservation,  container,  and maximum
holding time  procedures  specified   in
the table below:
Contaminant
Thallium
Preservative '
HNO3 .
Con-
tainer2
PorG .
Times
6 months
Contaminant
Antimony 	
Arsenic

Asbestos
Barium
Beryllium .
Cadmium
Chromium . ..
Cyanide . ..
Fluoride . .
Mercury . .
Nickel 	
Nitrate .. .
Nitrate-Nitrite6
Nitrite
Selenium . .
Preservative 1
HNO3
Cone HNO3 to
pH<2
4°C .
HNO3
HNO3
HNO3 .
HNO3 	
4 °C, NaOH ,
None
HNO3 . .
HNO3
4°C
H2SO4 . . .
4°C 	
HNO3
Con-
tainer2
PorG ...
PorG

PorG
PorG
PorG
PorG .
PorG
PorG
PorG
PorG .
PorG
P or G . .
PorG...
PorG
P or G
Time3
6 months
6 months

48 hours4
6 months
6 months
6 months
6 months
14 days
1 month
28 days
6 months
48 hours5
28 days
48 hours
6 months
  1 For cyanide determinations samples must be adjusted with
sodium  hydroxide to pH 12 at the time off collection When
chilling is indicated the sample must be shipped and stored at
4 °C or  less Acidification of nitrate or metals samples may be
with a concentrated acid or a dilute (50% by volume) solution
of the applicable concentrated acid Acidification of samples
for metals analysis is encouraged and allowed at the labora-
tory rather than at the time of sampling provided the shipping
time and other instructions  in  Section 8.3 of  EPA Methods
200 7 or 200 8 or 200 9 are followed
  2 P=plastic, hard or soft, G=glass, hard or soft
  3 In all cases samples should be analyzed as soon after col-
lection as possible  Follow additional  (if any)  information on
preservation, containers or holding times that  is  specified in
method
  4 Instructions for containers,  preservation  procedures and
holding  times as specified in Method 100 2 must be adhered
to for all compliance analyses including those conducted with
Method  1001
  5 If the  sample  is chlorinated,  the holding time for an
unacidified sample  kept at 4 C is extended to 14 days
  e Nitrate-Nitrite refers to a measurement of total nitrate

  (3)  Analysis under this section  shall
only  be conducted by laboratories that
have   been   certified  by EPA  or  the
State.  Laboratories may conduct sam-
ple analysis under  provisional  certifi-
cation until January 1, 1996.  To receive
certification  to  conduct  analyses  for
antimony,  arsenic,   asbestos,  barium,
beryllium,  cadmium,  chromium, cya-
nide, fluoride, mercury, nickel, nitrate,
nitrite  and selenium and thallium,  the
laboratory must:
                                                  370

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.24
  (i) Analyze Performance Evaluation
(PE)  samples  provided by  EPA,  the
State or by a third party (with the ap-
proval of the State or EPA)  at least
once a year.
  (ii)  For each contaminant that  has
been included in the PE sample and for
each method for which the laboratory
desires  certification   achieve  quan-
titative  results on  the analyses that
are within   the  following acceptance
limits:
Contaminant
Antimony . . ....
Arsenic . . ....
Asbestos 	

Barium 	
Beryllium 	
Cadmium 	
Chromium 	
Cyanide 	
Fluoride
Mercury 	
Nickel .
Nitrate ...
Nitrite 	
Selenium
Thallium .
Acceptance limit
±30 at aO 006 mg/1
±30 at >0 003 mg/L
2 standard deviations based
on study statistics
±15% at aO 15 mg/1
±15% at SO 001 mg/1
±20% at SO 002 mg/1
±15%ata001 mg/1
±25% at £0 1 mg/1
±10% at £1 to 10 mg/1
±30% at £0.0005 mg/1
±15% at a001 mg/1
±10% at £0 4 mg/1
±15% at SO 4 mg/1
±20% at 30 01 mg/1
±30% at BO 002 mg/1
  (1) Analyses for the purpose of deter-
mining compliance with §141.11 shall be
conducted using the requirements spec-
ified in paragraphs (1) through (q) of
this section.
  (1) Analyses for all community water
systems utilizing surface water sources
shall  be  completed by June 24, 1978.
These  analyses shall be  repeated at
yearly intervals.
  (2) Analyses for all community water
systems  utilizing  only  ground  water
sources shall be completed by June 24,
1979. These analyses shall be repeated
at three-year intervals.
  (3) For non-community  water  sys-
tems,  whether supplied by surface or
ground sources,  analyses for  nitrate
shall  be  completed by December  24,
1980. These analyses shall be repeated
at intervals determined by the State.
  (4) The State has the authority to de-
termine compliance or initiate enforce-
ment action based upon analytical re-
sults and other information compiled
by their sanctioned representatives and
agencies.
  (m) If the result of an analysis made
under paragraph (1) of this section indi-
cates that the level of any contami-
nant listed in §141.11 exceeds the max-
imum  contaminant level,  the supplier
of the water shall report to the State
within 7 days and initiate  three addi-
tional analyses at  the same  sampling
point within one month.
  (n) When the average of four analyses
made pursuant to paragraph (m) of this
section, rounded to the same number of
significant  figures  as the maximum
contaminant level for the substance in
question,  exceeds the  maximum con-
taminant level, the supplier  of water
shall  notify  the  State  pursuant  to
§141.31 and give notice to the public
pursuant  to  subpart  Q.  Monitoring
after  public notification  shall be at a
frequency designated by the State and
shall  continue until  the maximum con-
taminant level  has  not been  exceeded
in two  successive samples or until a
monitoring schedule as a condition to a
variance,  exemption  or  enforcement
action shall become effective.
  (o)  The  provisions of paragraphs (m)
and (n) of this section notwithstanding,
compliance with the  maximum  con-
taminant  level for nitrate shall be de-
termined  on the basis of the mean of
two analyses. When a level exceeding
the maximum  contaminant  level for
nitrate is  found, a second analysis shall
be initiated within 24 hours, and if the
mean of the two analyses exceeds the
maximum contaminant level, the sup-
plier  of water shall report his findings
to the State  pursuant to  §141.31  and
shall  notify the  public pursuant to sub-
part Q.
  (p)  For  the initial analyses required
by paragraph (1) (1), (2) or (3)  of this
section,  data for surface  waters ac-
quired within one year prior to the ef-
fective date and data for ground waters
acquired within 3 years prior to the ef-
fective date of  this part  may be sub-
stituted at the discretion of the State.
  (q) [Reserved]
[56 FR 3579, Jan. 30, 1991, as amended at 56
FR 30274, July 1,  1991;  57 FR 31838, July 17,
1992; 59 FR 34322,  July 1, 1994; 59 FR  62466,
Dec. 5, 1994; 60 FR 33932, 34085, June 29, 1995;
64 FR  67461, Dec. 1, 1999; 65 FR 26022, May 4,
2000; 66 FR 7061, Jan. 22,  2001; 67 FR  65246,
Oct. 23, 2002; 67 FR 65897,  Oct. 29, 2002; 67 FR
68911, Nov. 13, 2002; 68 FR 14506, Mar. 25, 2003]

§141.24  Organic chemicals,  sampling
   and analytical requirements.
  (a)-(d) [Reserved]
  (e) Analyses for the  contaminants in
this section shall be  conducted using
                                     371

-------
§141.24
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
the  following  EPA methods  or  their
equivalent as approved by EPA.
  (1) The following documents are in-
corporated by  reference. This incorpo-
ration by reference  was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C.  552(a) and  1
CPR part 51. Copies  may be  inspected
at EPA's Drinking Water Docket, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW., EPA West,
Room B102, Washington DC 20460 (Tele-
phone: 202-566-2426); or at the National
Archives  and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the avail-
ability of this  material  at  NARA, call
202-741-6030,    or    go    to:   http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of	federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.  Method  508A  and
515.1 are in Methods for the Determina-
tion  of Organic Compounds  in  Drinking
Water,  EPA/600/4-88-039, December 1988,
Revised, July 1991. Methods 547, 550 and
550.1 are in Methods for the Determina-
tion  of Organic Compounds  in  Drinking
Water—Supplement  I,  EPA/600-4-90-020,
July 1990. Methods 548.1, 549.1, 552.1 and
555 are in Methods for the Determination
of  Organic  Compounds  in   Drinking
Water—Supplement II,  EPA/600/R-92-129,
August 1992. Methods 502.2, 504.1, 505,
506,  507,  508, 508.1, 515.2,   524.2,  525.2,
531.1, 551.1 and 552.2 are in  Methods for
the Determination of Organic Compounds
in Drinking Water—Supplement III, EPA/
600/R-95-131,  August  1995. Method 1613
is   titled    "Tetra-through   Octa-
Chlorinated Dioxins and Furans by Iso-
tope-Dilution HRGC/HRMS",  EPA/821-
B-94-005,  October  1994.  These  docu-
ments  are available from the National
Technical  Information Service, NTIS
PB91-231480,  PB91-146027,  PB92-207703,
PB95-261616 and PB95-104774,  U.S. De-
partment  of  Commerce,  5285  Port
Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
The  toll-free  number is  800-553-6847.
Method 6651 shall be followed in  ac-
cordance with Standard Methods for the
Examination  of Water and  Wastewater,
18th edition (1992), 19th edition (1995),
or 20th edition (1998), American Public
Health  Association  (APHA); any of
these  three  editions  may  be  used.
Method 6610 shall be followed in  ac-
cordance with Standard Methods for the
Examination of  Water and  Wastewater,
(18th Edition Supplement) (1994),  or with
the 19th edition (1995) or 20th  edition
(1998) of Standard Methods for the Exam-
ination of Water and Wastewater; any of
these three editions may be used. The
APHA documents  are available  from
APHA,  1015  Fifteenth  Street  NW.,
Washington, D.C. 20005. Other required
analytical test procedures germane  to
the conduct of these analyses are con-
tained in  Technical Notes on Drinking
Water Methods, EPA/600/R-94-173, Octo-
ber 1994, NTIS PB95-104766. EPA Meth-
ods 515.3  and  549.2 are available from
U.S. Environmental  Protection Agen-
cy, National  Exposure Research Lab-
oratory  (NERL)-Cincinnati,  26  West
Martin  Luther King Drive, Cincinnati,
OH 45268.  ASTM Method  D 5317-93 is
available  in the Annual Book of ASTM
Standards,  (1999),  Vol.  11.02,  ASTM
International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
West  Conshohocken,  PA  19428, or  in
any edition published after 1993. EPA
Method   515.4,    "Determination    of
Chlorinated Acids  in Drinking Water
by   Liquid-Liquid    Microextraction,
Derivatization and Fast  Gas Chroma-
tography  with Electron Capture Detec-
tion," Revision 1.0, April 2000, EPA /815/
B-00/001    can   be    accessed   and
downloaded   directly   on-line    at
www.epa.gov/safewater/methods/
sourcalt.html.  The  Syngenta   AG-625,
"Atrazine   in   Drinking   Water   by
Immunoassay", February 2001 is avail-
able from Syngenta Crop  Protection,
Inc., 410 Swing  Road, Post Office Box
18300,  Greensboro,  NC  27419,   Phone
number  (336)  632-6000.  Method  531.2
"Measurement          of          N-
methylcarbamoyloximes    and    N-
methylcarbamates in Water by Direct
Aqueous    Injection    HPLC    with
Postcolumn Derivatization,"  Revision
1.0, September  2001,  EPA 815/B/01/002
can be  accessed  and  downloaded  di-
rectly on-line  at www.epa.gov/safewater/
methods/sourcalt.html.
Contaminant
1 Benzene . .
EPA meth-
od1
5022,
5242
Standard
methods

ASTM

Other

                                     372

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                §141.24
                          Contaminant
EPA meth-
   od1
Standard
methods
                                                                                        ASTM
                                                                                                    Other
2 Carbon tetrachlonde          	           ..  .           ....    5022,
                                                                 5242,
                                                                 551 1
3 Chlorobenzene              	      ...        ...   502 2,
                                                                 5242
4 1,2-Dichlorobenzene       	         .   .            .        5022,
                                                                 524.2
5 1,4-Dichlorobenzene  . .       	          ......   5022,
                                                                 5242
6 1,2-Dichloroethane      	          .  .        5022,
                                                                 5242
7 cis-Dichloroethylene ....     	       . .   .      ...     502 2,
                                                                 5242
8 trans-Dichloroethylene   ....            ....      	     502 2,
                                                                 5242
9 Dichloromethane	          	       	   502 2,
                                                                 5242
10 1,2-Dichloropropane 	      	        5022,
                                                                 5242
11 Ethylbenzene    	       	       	        5022,
                                                                 5242
12 Styrene .       	          	        502.2,
                                                                 5242.
13 Tetrachloroethylene  	        5022,
                                                                 524.2,
                                                                 551 1
14 1,1,1-Tnchloroethane ...        	        	     5022,
                                                                 5242,
                                                                 551 1
15 Trichloroethylene	      ..        ...   5022,
                                                                 5242,
                                                                 551 1
16. Toluene   	         	    5022,
                                                                 5242.
17. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene      	       	       ..      502.2,
                                                                 524.2
18 1,1-Dichloroethylene	     5022,
                                                                 5242
19 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 	       	      ..       ...   5022,
                                                                 5242,
                                                                 551 1
20 Vinyl chlonde  	        	        502.2,
                                                                 5242
21. Xylenes (total)      	          .       	        5022,
                                                                 5242
22. 2,3,7,8-TCDD (dioxm) 	     1613
23 2,4-D" (as acid, salts and esters) .          .      ..      .        5152,555,
                                                                 5151,
                                                                 5153,
                                                                 5154
24 2,4,5-TP4(Sllvex)  	         	      .    515.2,555,
                                                                 5151,
                                                                 515.3,
                                                                 5154
25 Alachlor2  . .          	          	      	507,5252,
                                                                 508.1,
                                                                 505,
                                                                 551 1
26 Atrazme2	        	   507,5252,
                                                                 5081,
                                                                 505,
                                                                 551.1
27 Benzo(a)pyrene  .         .     .       ..        .....   525 2, 550,
                                                                 5501
28 Carbofuran  ...         	         ...      ..     	    531 1,       6610.
                                                                 531 2
29. Chlordane    	       	       	      508,525.2,
                                                                 5081,
                                                                 505
                      D5317-93
                      D5317-93.
                                  Syngenta
                                   AG-625
                                                   373

-------
§141.24
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant
30 Dalapon




31 Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate .
32 Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ... . ....
33 Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) .. . . 	

34 Dinoseb4 	 . 	



35 Diquat 	 ....
36 Endothall 	 	 . . ..
37. Endrin ... ... 	 	



38 Ethylene dibromide (EDB)

39 Glyphosate 	 	 	
40 Heptachlor . . 	



41 Heptachlor Epoxide 	 	



42 Hexachlorobenzene 	 	



43. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ... 	 	



44 Lindane . . . 	



45 Methoxychlor . 	 ... 	



46 Oxamyl

47 PCBs 3 (as decachlorobiphenyl) . . . . . 	
48 PCBs 3 (as Aroclors) 	


49. Pentachlorophenol 	





50 Picloram4 	 	



51 Sirnazine2



52 Toxaphene 	 	 	


EPA meth-
od1
5521,
5151,
5522,
515.3,
5154
506, 525 2
506, 525 2
5041,
551 1
5152, 555,
5151,
515.3,
515.4
5492
5481.
508, 525 2,
508 1,
505,
551.1.
504 1,
551.1.
547
508, 525.2,
5081,
505,
551.1
508, 525 2,
5081,
505,
551 1.
508, 525 2,
508.1,
505,
551 1
508, 525.2,
508 1,
505,
551 1
508, 525 2,
5081,
505,
551.1
508, 525 2,
508.1,
505,
551 1
531 1,
531 2
508A
508.1 , 508,
5252,
505.
5152,
5252,
555,
5151,
5153,
5154
5152,555,
5151,
515.3,
515.4.
507, 525 2,
508.1,
505,
551 1
508, 508 1 ,
5252,
505
Standard
methods





















6651
























6610






















ASTM




















































D5317-93.





D5317-93










Other





































































                                   374

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §141.24
Contaminant
53 Total Trihalomethanes" . ...


EPA meth-
od1
5022,
5242,
551 1
Standard
methods



ASTM



Other



  1 For previously approved EPA methods which remain available for compliance monitoring until June 1, 2001, see paragraph
(e)(2) of this section.
  2 Substitution of the detector specified in Method 505, 507, 508 or 508 1 for the purpose of achieving lower detection limits is
allowed as follows Either an electron capture or nitrogen phosphorous detector may be used provided all regulatory require-
ments and quality control criteria are met
  3 PCBs are qualitatively identified as Aroclors and measured for compliance purposes as decachlorobiphenyl Users of Method
505 may have more difficulty in achieving the required detection limits than users of Methods 508 1, 525 2 or 508
  4 Accurate determination of the chlorinated esters requires hydrolysis of the sample as described in EPA Methods 5151,
515 2 515 3, 515 4 and 555 and ASTM Method D5317-93
  (2) The following EPA methods will
remain available for compliance moni-
toring until June 1, 2001. The following
documents   are  incorporated by ref-
erence. This incorporation by reference
was approved by  the Director  of the
Federal Register in accordance  with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CPR Part 51.  Copies
may be inspected at  EPA's  Drinking
Water Docket.  401 M  St., SW.,  Wash-
ington, DC 20460; or at the National Ar-
chives   and  Records   Administration
(NARA). For information on the avail-
ability of this material  at NARA, call
202-741-6030,   or    go    to:    http.//
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of	federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html. EPA  methods 502.2
Rev. 2.0, 505 Rev.  2.0,  507  Rev. 2.0, 508
Rev. 3.0, 531.1 Rev. 3.0 are in "Methods
for the Determination of Organic Com-
pounds in Drinking Water", December
1988, revised July 1991; methods 506 and
551  are in "Methods for the Determina-
tion of Organic Compounds in Drinking
Water—Supplement I", July 1990; meth-
ods 515.2 Rev. 1.0 and 524.2 Rev. 4.0 are
in "Methods for the Determination  of
Organic  Compounds   in   Drinking
Water—Supplement  II,"  August 1992;
and methods 504.1 Rev.  1.0,  508.1 Rev.
1.0, 525.2 Rev.1.0 are available  from US
EPA NERL,  Cincinnati, OH 45268
  (f) Beginning with the  initial compli-
ance period,  analysis  of the  contami-
nants  listed  in  §141.61(a)  (1)  through
(21)  for  the purpose  of  determining
compliance  with  the maximum  con-
taminant level  shall  be conducted  as
follows;
  (1) Groundwater systems shall take a
minimum of one sample  at every entry
point to the distribution system which
is representative  of  each well  after
treatment (hereafter called a sampling
point).  Each sample must be taken  at
the same sampling point unless condi-
tions  make  another  sampling  point
more  representative of  each  source,
treatment  plant,  or within the dis-
tribution system.
  (2)  Surface water systems (or com-
bined surface/ground) shall take a min-
imum of one sample at points in the
distribution system that are represent-
ative of each source or at each entry
point to the distribution system after
treatment (hereafter called a sampling
point).  Each sample must be taken  at
the same sampling point unless condi-
tions  make  another  sampling1  point
more  representative of  each  source,
treatment  plant,  or within the dis-
tribution system.
  (3)  If the  system  draws water from
more than  one  source and the  sources
are combined before distribution, the
system must sample at an entry point
to the distribution system during peri-
ods  of  normal operating   conditions
(i.e.,  when  water representative  of all
sources is being used).
  (4)  Each  community and non-tran-
sient  non-community  water  system
shall take  four consecutive quarterly
samples for each contaminant listed in
§141.61(a) (2) through (21) during each
compliance  period,  beginning  in the
initial compliance period.
  (5) If the  initial monitoring for con-
taminants   listed   in   §141.61(a)  (1)
through (8) and the monitoring for the
contaminants  listed in  §141.61(a)  (9)
through (21) as allowed  in  paragraph
(f)(18) has been  completed by December
31, 1992, and the system did not detect
any contaminant listed in §141.61(a) (1)
through (21), then each ground and sur-
face  water system shall take one sam-
ple annually beginning with  the initial
compliance period.
                                      375
      203-160  D-13

-------
§141.24
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (6) After a minimum of three years of
annual sampling, the State may allow
groundwater systems with no previous
detection of any contaiminant listed in
§141.61(a) to take  one  sample  during
each compliance period.
  (7) Each  community and non-tran-
sient non-community  ground   water
system  which does  not  detect  a con-
taminant   listed   in  §141.61(a)  (1)
through (21) may apply to the State for
a  waiver from the requirements  of
paragraphs  (f)(5) and (f)(6) of this sec-
tion after completing the initial moni-
toring.  (For purposes of this section,
detection is defined as 20.0005 mg/1.) A
waiver shall be effective for no more
than six years (two compliance peri-
ods). States may also issue waivers to
small systems for the initial round of
monitoring for 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene.
  (8) A State may grant a waiver after
evaluating the following factor(s):
  (i) Knowledge of previous use (includ-
ing transport, storage,  or disposal) of
the contaminant within the watershed
or zone of influence of the system. If a
determination by  the State reveals no
previous use of the contaminant within
the watershed  or  zone  of influence,  a
waiver may  be granted.
  (ii) If  previous  use of  the  contami-
nant is unknown  or it has  been used
previously,  then  the following  factors
shall be used to determine whether a
waiver is granted.
  (A) Previous analytical results.
  (B) The proximity of the system to a
potential point or non-point source of
contamination.  Point sources include
spills and leaks of chemicals at or near
a water treatment facility or at manu-
facturing, distribution, or storage fa-
cilities, or from hazardous and  munic-
ipal waste  landfills and  other  waste
handling or  treatment facilities.
  (C) The   environmental  persistence
and transport of the contaminants.
  (D) The number of persons served by
the public water system and the prox-
imity of a smaller system to a larger
system.
  (E) How well the water source is pro-
tected against contamination, such as
whether it is a surface  or groundwater
system.  Groundwater  systems must
consider factors such as depth of the
well, the type of soil, and wellhead pro-
tection.  Surface  water systems must
consider watershed protection.
  (9) As a condition of the waiver  a
groundwater system must  take one
sample  at each sampling point during
the time the waiver is  effective (i.e.,
one sample  during two  compliance pe-
riods or six years) and  update its vul-
nerability assessment considering the
factors listed in paragraph (f)(8) of this
section. Based on this vulnerability as-
sessment the  State must  reconfirm
that the system  is  non-vulnerable. If
the State does not  make this recon-
firmation within three years of the ini-
tial determination, then the waiver is
invalidated  and the system is required
to  sample  annually as  specified  in
paragraph (5) of this section.
  (10) Each  community  and non-tran-
sient  non-community  surface  water
system  which does  not detect a con-
taminant   listed   in   §141.61(a)  (1)
through (21) may apply to the State for
a waiver from the requirements of (f)(5)
of this section after completing the ini-
tial  monitoring.  Composite  samples
from  a  maximum  of  five  sampling
points are allowed,  provided that the
detection limit of the method used for
analysis is  less than one-fifth of the
MCL. Systems meeting this criterion
must be determined  by  the State to be
non-vulnerable  based  on  a  vulner-
ability assessment during each compli-
ance period. Each system receiving  a
waiver  shall sample  at the frequency
specified by the State (if any).
  (11)  If a  contaminant  listed  in
§141.61(a) (2) through (21) is detected at
a  level  exceeding 0.0005 mg/1 in any
sample, then:
  (i) The system  must monitor quar-
terly at each sampling  point which re-
sulted in a detection.
  (ii) The State may decrease the quar-
terly monitoring  requirement   speci
fled in  paragraph (f)(ll)(i) of this sec-
tion provided it  has determined that
the system is reliably and consistently
below   the   maximum  contaminant
level. In no case  shall the State make
this determination  unless a  ground-
water system takes a minimum of two
quarterly samples and a surface water
system  takes a minimum of four quar-
terly samples.
  (iii) If the State determines that the
system   is  reliably   and  consistently
                                     376

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.24
below the MCL,  the State may allow
the system to monitor annually. Sys-
tems  which  monitor annually must
monitor during  the quarter(s) which
previously yielded the highest analyt-
ical result.
  (iv)  Systems which have three con-
secutive annual samples with no detec-
tion of a contaminant may apply to the
State for a waiver as specified in para-
graph (f)(7) of this section.
  (v) Groundwater systems which have
detected one  or more of the following
two-carbon organic  compounds:  tri-
chloroethylene,  tetrachloroethylene,
1,2-dichlor oethane,      1,1,1-trichlor o-
ethane, cis-l,2-dichloroethylene, trans-
1.2-dichloroethylene,       or      1,1-
dichloroethylene  shall  monitor quar-
terly for vinyl chloride. A vinyl chlo-
ride sample shall  be taken at each sam-
pling point at which one or more of the
two-carbon organic compounds was de-
tected. If the  results of the first anal-
ysis do not detect  vinyl chloride,  the
State may reduce the quarterly moni-
toring frequency of vinyl chloride mon-
itoring to one sample during each com-
pliance period. Surface water systems
are required to monitor for vinyl chlo-
ride as specified by the State.
  (12)  Systems which violate  the re-
quirements of §141.61(a) (1) through
(21), as determined by paragraph (f)(15)
of this  section,  must  monitor quar-
terly.  After a minimum  of four con-
secutive  quarterly samples which show
the system is in compliance as speci-
fied in paragraph (f)(15) of this section
the system and the  State determines
that the  system is reliably and consist-
ently below the maximum contaminant
level, the system may monitor at  the
frequency and times specified in para-
graph (f)(ll)(iii) of this section.
  (13) The State may require  a  con-
firmation sample for positive or nega-
tive results. If a confirmation sample is
required  by the State, the  result must
be averaged with  the first sampling re-
sult and the  average is used  for  the
compliance determination  as specified
by paragraph (f)(15). States have discre-
tion to delete results of obvious sam-
pling errors from this calculation.
  (14) The State may reduce the total
number of samples a system must ana-
lyze   by   allowing   the  use   of
compositing:.  Composite samples from
a maximum of five sampling points are
allowed, provided that  the detection
limit of the method used for analysis is
less  than  one-fifth   of   the   MCL.
Compositing of samples must be done
in the laboratory and analyzed  within
14 days of sample collection.
  (i) If the  concentration in the com-
posite sample is greater than or equal
to 0.0005 mg/1 for any contaminant list-
ed in §141.61(a),  then a follow-up sam-
ple must  be taken  within  14 days at
each  sampling point  included  in  the
composite,  and  be  analyzed  for  that
contaminant.
  (ii)  If duplicates of the original sam-
ple taken from  each sampling point
used in the composite sample are avail-
able,  the system may use these instead
of resampling. The duplicates must be
analyzed  and the results reported to
the State within 14 days  after com-
pleting analysis  of the composite sam-
ple, provided the  holding time  of  the
sample is not exceeded.
  (iii) If the population served  by  the
system  is   >  3,300   persons,  then
compositing may only be permitted by
the State at sampling points  within a
single system. In  systems serving <
3,300  persons, the  State may  permit
compositing  among different systems
provided the 5-sample  limit is main-
tained.
  (iv) Compositing samples prior to GC
analysis.
  (A)  Add  5 ml or equal larger amounts
of each sample (up to 5 samples  are al-
lowed) to a 25 ml  glass syringe. Special
precautions must be made to maintain
zero headspace in the syringe.
  (B)  The  samples must be cooled at 4
°C during this step  to  minimize vola-
tilization losses.
  (C) Mix well and draw out a 5-ml ali-
quot for analysis.
  (D)   Follow  sample  introduction,
purging, and desorption steps described
in the method.
  (E) If less than  five samples are used
for  compositing,   a  proportionately
small syringe may be used.
  (v) Compositing samples prior  to GC/
MS analysis.
  (A)   Inject  5-ml  or  equal  larger
amounts of each aqueous sample (up to
5 samples  are  allowed) into  a 25-ml
                                    377

-------
§141.24
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
purging device using the sample intro-
duction  technique  described  in  the
method.
  (B) The total volume of the sample in
the purging device must be 25 ml.
  (C) Purge and desorb as  described in
the method.
  (15)  Compliance  with §141.61(a)  (1)
through  (21) shall be determined based
on  the analytical results  obtained at
each sampling point.  If one sampling
point is  in violation  of an  MCL, the
system is in violation of the MCL.
  (i) For  systems  monitoring  more
than once  per year, compliance  with
the MCL is determined by a  running
annual average at each sampling point.
  (ii) Systems  monitoring  annually or
less frequently whose sample result ex-
ceeds the  MCL must  begin quarterly
sampling. The  system  will not be con-
sidered in violation of  the MCL until it
has completed one  year of quarterly
sampling.
  (iii)  If any sample result will cause
the running annual average to exceed
the MCL at  any sampling point, the
system is  out  of compliance with the
MCL immediately.
  (iv) If a system fails  to collect the re-
quired number of samples, compliance
will be based on the  total number of
samples collected.
  (v) If a sample result is less than the
detection limit,  zero  will be  used to
calculate the annual average.
  (16) [Reserved]
  (17) Analysis under this section  shall
only be conducted by laboratories that
are certified by EPA  or the State ac-
cording  to the  following conditions
(laboratories   may   conduct   sample
analysis  under provisional certification
until January 1, 1996):
  (i) To receive certification to conduct
analyses   for  the  contaminants  in
§141.61(a) (2) through  (21) the  labora-
tory must:
  (A) Analyze Performance Evaluation
(PE)  samples  provided  by  EPA, the
State,  or by a third party (with the ap-
proval of the  State or  EPA)  at  least
once a year by each method for which
the laboratory desires  certification.
  (B) Achieve the quantitative  accept-
ance     limits    under    paragraphs
(f)(17)(i)(C) and (D)  of this section for
at least  80 percent of the regulated or-
ganic contaminants included in the PE
sample.
  (C)  Achieve quantitative results  on
the  analyses performed  under  para-
graph (f)(17)(i)(A)  of this section that
are within +20% of the actual amount
of the substances in the Performance
Evaluation  sample  when the  actual
amount is greater than or equal to 0.010
mg/1.
  (D)  Achieve quantitative results  on
the  analyses performed  under  para-
graph (f)(17)(i)(A)  of this section that
are within  ±40 percent  of the actual
amount of the substances in the Per-
formance  Evaluation sample when the
actual amount is less than 0.010 mg/1.
  (E) Achieve a method detection limit
of 0.0005 mg/1. according to the proce-
dures in appendix B of part 136.
  (ii)  To receive  certification to con-
duct analyses for vinyl chloride,  the
laboratory must:
  (A)  Analyze Performance Evaluation
(PE)  samples provided  by  EPA,  the
State, or by a third party (with the ap-
proval of the State or EPA) at least
once a year by each method for  which
the laboratory desires  certification.
  (B)  Achieve quantitative results  on
the  analyses performed  under  para-
graph (f)(17)(ii)(A) of this section that
are within  ±40 percent  of the actual
amount of vinyl chloride in the Per-
formance Evaluation sample.
  (C) Achieve a method detection limit
of 0.0005 mg/1, according to the proce-
dures in appendix B of part 136.
  (D) Obtain certification  for the con-
taminants   listed    in   §141.61(a)(2)
through (21).
  (18) States may allow the use of mon-
itoring  data collected after January 1,
1988, required under section 1445  of the
Act for purposes of initial monitoring
compliance.  If the data are generally
consistent with the other requirements
of this section, the State may use these
data (i.e., a  single sample rather than
four quarterly samples) to satisfy the
initial monitoring requirement of para-
graph  (f)(4)  of this  section. Systems
which use grandfathered samples  and
did not detect any contaminant listed
§141.61(a)(2)  through  (21)  shall  begin
monitoring  annually  in  accordance
with paragraph (f)(5) of this section  be-
ginning with the initial compliance  pe-
riod.
                                     378

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.24
  (19)  States may  increase  required
monitoring where neces.sary to detect
variations within the system.
  (20) Each certified laboratory must
determine the method  detection limit
(MDL), as defined in appendix B to part
136, at which it is capable of detecting
VOCs. The acceptable  MDL  is  0.0005
mg/1. This concentration is the detec-
tion concentration for purposes of, this
section:
  (21) Each public water system shall
monitor at the time designated by the
State within each compliance period.
  (22) All new systems or systems that;
use a new source  of water that begin
operation after January 22, 2004 must
demonstrate compliance with the MCL
within a period of time specified by the
State. The  system must also  comply
with  the  initial sampling frequencies
specified by the State to ensure a sys-
tem can demonstrate compliance with
the MCL. Routine and increased moni-
toring frequencies shall be conducted
in accordance with the requirements in
this section.
  (g) [Reserved]
  (h) Analysis of the contaminants list-
ed in §141.61(c) for the  purposes of de-
termining  compliance  with the max-
imum contaminant level shall be con-
ducted as follows:7
  (1) Groundwater  systems shall take a
minimum of one sample at every entry
point to the distribution system which
is representative  of each  well  after
treatment (hereafter called a sampling
point). Each sample must  be taken at
the same sampling point unless condi-
tions make  another sampling point
more representative of  each source or
treatment plant.
  (2) Surface water systems shall take
a minimum of one sample at points in
the distribution system that  are  rep-
resentative  of each  source or  at each
entry point to the distribution system
after  treatment   (hereafter  called  a
sampling point). Each sample must be
taken at the same sampling point  un-
less conditions make another sampling
point  more  representative  of  each
source or treatment plant.
  'Monitoring   for   the   contaminants
aldicarb,  aldicarb  sulfoxide, and  aldicarb
sulfone shall be conducted  in  accordance
with §141.40.
  NOTE: For purposes of this paragraph, sur-
face water systems include systems with a
combination of surface and ground sources.
  (3) If the system  draws water from
more than one source and the sources
are combined before distribution,  the
system must sample at an entry point
to the distribution system during peri-
ods  of normal operating  conditions
(i.e., when water representative  of all
sources is being used).
  (4) Monitoring frequency:
  (i) Each community and  non-tran-
sient  non-community  water  system
shall take four consecutive  quarterly
samples for each contaminant listed in
§141.61(c)  during each compliance  pe-
riod beginning with the initial compli-
ance period.
  (ii) Systems serving more than 3,300
persons which do not detect a contami-
nant in the initial compliance period
may reduce the sampling frequency to
a minimum of two quarterly samples in
one  year  during each repeat  compli-
ance period.
  (iii)  Systems  serving  less  than  or
equal to 3,300 persons which do not de-
tect a contaminant in the initial com-
pliance period may reduce  the sam-
pling frequency to a minimum of one
sample during each repeat compliance
period.
  (5) Each community and  non-tran-
sient water system may  apply to  the
State for a waiver  from the require-
ment of paragraph (h)(4) of this sec-
tion.  A  system  must  reapply for  a
waiver for each compliance period.
  (6) A State may grant a waiver after
evaluating  the  following  factor(s):
Knowledge of previous use (including-
transport, storage, or disposal) of  the
contaminant within the watershed  or
zone of influence of the system. If a de-
termination by the  State reveals no
previous use of the contaminant within
the watershed  or zone of influence,  a
waiver may be granted. If previous  use
of the contaminant  is unknown or it
has been used previously, then the fol-
lowing factors  shall  be used to deter-
mine whether a waiver is granted.
  (i) Previous analytical results.
  (ii) The  proximity of the system to a
potential  point or non-point source of
contamination.  Point  sources  include
spills and  leaks of chemicals at or near
                                    379

-------
§141.24
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
a water treatment facility or at manu-
facturing, distribution, or storage fa-
cilities, or from hazardous and munic-
ipal  waste  landfills  and other  waste
handling or treatment facilities. Non-
point sources include the use of pes-
ticides to control insect and weed pests
on  agricultural  areas,  forest  lands,
home and gardens, and other land ap-
plication uses.
  (iii)  The  environmental persistence
and transport of the pesticide or PCBs.
  (iv) How well the water source is pro-
tected against contamination due  to
such factors as depth of the well and
the type of soil and the integrity  of the
well casing.
  (v)  Elevated nitrate  levels at  the
water supply source.
  (vi) Use of PCBs in equipment used in
the production, storage, or distribution
of water  (i.e., PCBs  used in pumps,
transformers, etc.).
  (7) If an  organic contaminant  listed
in §141.61(c) is detected  (as defined by
paragraph (h)(18) of this section) in any
sample, then:
  (i) Each system must  monitor quar-
terly  at each sampling point which re-
sulted in a detection.
  (ii) The State may decrease the quar-
terly  monitoring requirement specified
in paragraph (h)(7)(i) of this section
provided it has  determined that  the
system is   reliably  and consistently
below   the  maximum   contaminant
level. In no case shall the State  make
this  determination  unless a  ground-
water system takes a minimum of two
quarterly samples and a surface  water
system takes a minimum of four quar-
terly samples.
  (iii) After the  State determines the
system is   reliably  and consistently
below the maximum contaminant level
the State  may  allow  the system  to
monitor annually. Systems which mon-
itor annually must monitor during the
quarter  that previously  yielded  the
highest analytical result.
  (iv) Systems which have 3 consecu-
tive annual samples with no detection
of a  contaminant may apply to  the
State for a waiver as specified in para-
graph (h)(6) of this section.
  (v) If monitoring results in detection
of one or more of certain related con-
taminants  (aldicarb, aldicarb  sulfone,
aldicarb sulfoxide and heptachlor, hep-
tachlor epoxide), then subsequent mon-
itoring shall  analyze  for all related
contaminants.
  (8)  Systems  which  violate  the re-
quirements of §141.61(c) as determined
by  paragraph  (h)(ll)  of  this section
must monitor quarterly.  After a  min-
imum  of four quarterly samples show
the system  is  in  compliance  and the
State determines the system is reliably
and  consistently  below the  MCL,  as
specified in paragraph (h)(ll) of this
section, the  system shall monitor at
the frequency  specified in paragraph
(h)(7)(iii) of this section.
  (9)  The State  may require a  con-
firmation sample for positive or nega-
tive results. If a confirmation sample is
required by  the State, the result must
be averaged with the first sampling re-
sult and the average used for  the com-
pliance determination as specified  by
paragraph (h)(ll) of this section. States
have discretion to delete results of ob-
vious  sampling errors from  this cal-
culation.
  (10) The State may reduce the total
number of samples a system must ana-
lyze    by   allowing   the   use   of
compositing. Composite samples  from
a maximum of five sampling points are
allowed,  provided that  the  detection
limit of the method used for analysis is
less   than  one-fifth  of  the  MCL.
Compositing of samples must  be  done
in the laboratory  and analyzed within
14 days of sample collection.
  (i) If the concentration in the com-
posite sample detects one or more con-
taminants listed in §141.61(c), then a
follow-up  sample must be taken within
14 days at each sampling point included
in the composite,  and be analyzed for
that contaminant.
  (ii)  If duplicates of the original  sam-
ple taken from each sampling  point
used in the composite sample are avail-
able, the system may use these instead
of resampling.  The duplicates  must be
analyzed  and the results reported to
the State within 14 days after comple-
tion of the composite analysis or before
the holding  time for the initial sample
is exceeded whichever is sooner.
  (iii)  If the population served by the
system   is   >3,300   persons,   then
compositing may only be permitted by
the State at sampling points within a
single system. In systems  serving <
                                     380

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.24
3,300  persons, the  State may  permit
compositing  among- different systems
provided the  5-sample  limit  is main-
tained.
  (11) Compliance with §141.61(c) shall
be determined based on the analytical
results  obtained  at   each   sampling
point. If one sampling- point is in viola-
tion of an MCL, the system is in viola-
tion of the MCL.
  (i)  For  systems  monitoring-  more
than  once per year,  compliance with
the MCL  is determined by a running-
annual average at each  sampling point.
  (ii) Systems monitoring annually or
less frequently whose sample result ex-
ceeds the  regulatory detection level as
defined by paragraph (h)(18) of this sec-
tion  must begin quarterly  sampling.
The system will not be considered in
violation of the  MCL until it  has com-
pleted one year  of quarterly sampling.
  (iii) If any  sample result will cause
the running- annual average to  exceed
the MCL  at any sampling point,  the
system  is out of compliance  with  the
MCL immediately.
  (iv) If a system fails to collect  the re-
quired number of samples, compliance
will be  based on the total number of
samples collected.
  (v) If a sample result  is less than the
detection  limit,  zero will be used  to
calculate the annual average.
  (12) [Reserved]
  (13) Analysis for  PCBs shall be  con-
ducted as  follows using the methods in
paragraph (e) of this section:
  (i) Bach  system which monitors for
PCBs shall analyze each sample using-
either Method 508.1, 525.2,  508 or 505.
Users of Method 505 may have more dif-
ficulty  in   achieving   the  required
Aroclor detection limits than users of
Methods 508.1, 525.2 or 508.
  (ii) If PCBs (as one of seven Aroclors)
are  detected  (as designated in  this
paragraph)  in any sample  analyzed
using Method 505 or 508, the system
shall reanalyze the  sample using Meth-
od  508A   to   quantitate  PCBs   (as
decachlorobiphenyl).
Aroclor
1260
Detection limit (mg/
I)
00002
Aroclor
1016 .
1221
1232 	
1242 . .. .
1248
1254
Detection limit (mg/
I)
0 00008
002
00005
00003
00001
0.0001
  (iii) Compliance with the PCB MCL
shall  be determined based  upon  the
quantitative  results of analyses  using
Method 508A.
  (14) If monitoring data collected after
January 1,  1990,  are  generally  con-
sistent   with  the  requirements  of
§141.24(h),  then  the- State may  allow
systems to use that data to satisfy the
monitoring requirement for the initial
compliance period  beginning January
1, 1993.
  (15) The  State may increase the re-
quired  monitoring  frequency,  where
necessary,  to detect variations within
the system (e.g., fluctuations in con-
centration  due to seasonal use, changes
in water source).
  (16) The  State has the  authority to
determine  compliance  or initiate en-
forcement action based upon analytical
results and other information compiled
by their sanctioned representatives and
agencies.
  (17) Each public  water  system shall
monitor at the time designated by the
State within  each compliance period.
  (18) Detection as used in this  para-
graph shall be defined as  greater than
or equal to  the  following concentra-
tions for each contaminant.
Contaminant
Alachlor 	
Aldicarb ....
Aldicarb sulfoxide 	
Aldicarb sulfone
Atrazme .
Benzo[ajpyrene .
Carbofuran
Chlordane , .
Dalapon 	
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) . .
Di (2-ethylhexyl) adipate
Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate . .
Dmoseb . 	
Diquat
2,4-D . . .
Endothall
Endnn . . ....
Ethylene dibromide (EDB)
Glyphosate ,
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene 	
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 	
Ljndane
Methoxychlor
Oxamyl
Picloram
Detection
limit (mg/l)
0002
0005
0005
.0008
0001
00002
0009
0002
001
00002
0006
0006
0002
0004
0001
009
00001
00001
006
00004
00002
0001
0001
00002
0001
002
0001
                                    381

-------
§141.25
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant
Polychlormated biphenyls (PCBs) (as
decachlorobiphenyl) 	
Pentachlorophenol
Simazme
Toxaphene
2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxm)
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Detection
limit (mg/l)
0001
00004
00007
001
000000005
0002
(19) Anaylsis under this section shall
Contaminant
Picloram
Simazme
Toxaphene
Aldicarb
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Aldicarb sulfone .
Pentachlorophenol
2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxm)
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Acceptance limits (percent)
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
±45
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
±50
2 standard deviations
±50
±50
only be conducted by laboratories that
have received certification by EPA or
the State and have met the following-
conditions:
  (i) To receive certification to conduct
analyses  for  the  contaminants  in
§141.61(c) the laboratory must:
  (A)  Analyze Performance Evaluation
(PE)  samples  provided  by  EPA,  the
State, or by a third party (with the ap-
proval of the State or EPA)  at least
once a year by each method for which
the laboratory desires certification.
  (B)  For each contaminant  that  has
been included in the PE sample achieve
quantitative  results  on  the  analyses
that are within  the following accept-
ance limits:
Contaminant
DBCP
EDB
Alachlor
Atrazme
Benzo[a]pyrene .
Carbofuran
Chlordane
Dalapon
Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Dmoseb
Diquat
Endothall
Endrm
Glyphosate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloro- cyclopentadiene
Lindane
Methoxychlor
Oxamyl
PCBs (as
Decachlorobiphenyl)
Acceptance limits (percent)
±40
±40
±45
±45
2 standard deviations
±45
+45
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
±30
2 standard deviations
±45
±45
2 standard deviations
2 standard deviations
±45
±45
2 standard deviations
0-200

  (ii) [Reserved]
  (20) All new systems or systems that
use a new source of water that begin
operation after January 22,  2004 must
demonstrate compliance with the MCL
within a period of time specified by the
State. The  system  must also comply
with  the initial sampling frequencies
specified by the State to ensure  a sys-
tem can demonstrate compliance with
the MCL. Routine and increased  moni-
toring frequencies shall be  conducted
in accordance with the requirements in
this section.

(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 2040-0090)

[40 PR 59570, Dec. 24, 1975, as amended at 44
FE 68641, Nov. 29, 1979; 45 FR 57345, Augr. 27,
1980: 47 FR 10998, Mar. 12, 1982; 52 FR 25712,
July 8, 1987: 53 FR 5147,  Feb. 19, 1988; 53 FR
25110, July 1, 1988; 56 FR 3583, Jan. 30, 1991; 56
FR 30277, July 1, 1991; 57 FR 22178, May 27,
1992; 57 FR 31841, July 17, 1992; 59 FR 34323,
July 1, 1994; 59 FR 62468, Dec.  5, 1994; 60 FR
34085, June 29, 1995; 64 FR 67464, Dec.  1, 1999;
65 FR 26022, May 4, 2000; 66 FR 7063, Jan. 22,
2001: 67 FR 65250, Oct. 23,  2002; 67 FR 65898,
Oct. 29, 2002]

§141.25  Analytical methods for  radio-
    activity.

  (a)  Analysis for the following con-
taminants shall be conducted to  deter-
mine compliance with §141.66 (radioac-
tivity) in accordance with the methods
in the following table, or their equiva-
lent determined by EPA in accordance
with §141.27.
                                      382

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
§141.25












1
o

a*
8
.

N
M
O







to
A
0) Si
13 *"
j i_ 	 	


|
CD

ex
o
o
£
s
fc
1

1
Lt






ASTM6 |






Ln
2
CD





<
Ul
I
U-!
CM










CD
0
S
CJ
o
CO


CL
|


LU ^_
1 ^




I
<
Q_
LU


1 Methodology
1

Contaminant

o

§

!
j Evaporation

Naturally occurring
Gross alpha11
and beta

0
> > Z


O g CM
CC 13 ~>
CO
CO tD CD CD" 1 tD
£SSl S5S

TT T T^T
CC CC CC CC CC

h- r-. .. N. r-
77 o577
•^r o J CM •*•
m co t h- r-
^r -^ 2 03 i-
co CM ^ co in
O D D Q Q

o
	 	 	 £Z
: -D s
LJJ ^~
O CD £ £

or cc Q — — ^
ici^ mo oS
Ooocc ^^ j^
o^^o cpo oS
T-LO^O <3o OCM
•T- o o m u5 m m


en en co
T- T- CO
0.0, Q.
!!!! S ?
O CC CC CC i O


CD CO TT
T- -r- CM ' '
Q. CL CL

T- 0 0 0 -r-

ill cl§
£-
§|ss s • | f
l|g£ O I §
Q.C{Dqj tDtl) Q^ -^
fill II I ll
occcccc ecu. < _i

tcD co
CM Od rj
CM 00
(C c c E
si i I -S
e^ S 2 g
C3 CC X D ?
c
CD




CO CO
CM CM
in to

, E cc
•C cc a! -c ns
o E E 8 E
-5 E 2^ E
ccSo^ccSS

si ^2
P |°
nj {u ra a)
a: s a: >



«

w°

(D
i
CD
i








CD

CO
o
in
co"
8


Q.
f
CO


s
a

o

1

j trometry
Radiochemi-
cal

Radioact-
ive Strontium
89, 90



CC

1
o

CO CO
^S

TT

107-91
649-91
785-93
pl§! S
f Ice 5 J
lllj 1
II ll 1

lili 1
.C Q 3 (T3 C

T} "O °.C
SI"1? -

Sg'-S E
™ S — "•§ c

°£CL S w
-gj1^- 3
f-2 15 o o

ooo T-^jO73 QJ
^ — 15 O ^
s; in ™ *i -=

CO
T
CO O
x r^
CO
0 ™
^oi

co£ r^


h- CM
CO O)
CL Q.
f


S
Q. •
O
O •*— o" £T
tD t— CM O)
C3i CJ) O)

Liquid scintillation
Gamma ray
Spectrometry
£
Tritium
Gamma emittei
r= 

-SS|"; §
•5 ji? = ° 5 ^ c\j
1 ~ a ~1 §1
||^l^<£0

^o-§5 ISp
l-Slf^ffl
o ^~ (0-52 co
<-> £3 >*8 o< J,
C C CO 0) ^O-o
0 CD £cc ^LIJ§

!ifi*ill

1 S T z 8 > >
oSoSjE ^"oe
I|i?8!


gi?«ii§
-sslil^ra
ill be done in accoi
3 with 5 U S C 552
the Safe Drinking V
i (Telephone 202-
'tp //www archives Q
Jures for the Measi
TIS), 5285 Port Ro
S a go* g&
The procedures j
Register in accorda
can be obtained fro
B135, Washington,
741-6030, or goto
1 "Prescribed Proi
Information Service
                                                             CiS  o


                                                              1-1
                                 383

-------
§141.25
                            40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
A  i
 il"^»
 .C £ CSJ^ 
-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.25
  (b) When the identification and meas-
urement  of  radionuclides other  than
those  listed in paragraph (a) of this
section is required, the  following- ref-
erences are to be  used, except in cases
where alternative methods have  been
approved in accordance with §141.27.
  (1) Procedures for Radiochemical Anal-
ysis  of Nuclear Reactor  Aqueous  Solu-
tions, H. L. Krieger and S. Gold, EPA-
R4-73-014.  USEPA, Cincinnati,  Ohio,
May 1973.
  (2) HASL Procedure Manual, Edited by
John  H.  Harley. HASL  300,  ERDA
Health and  Safety  Laboratory,  New
York, NY., 1973.
  (c) For the purpose of monitoring' ra-
dioactivity concentrations in  drinking
water, the required sensitivity  of the
radioanalysis is defined  in terms of a
detection  limit.  The detection  limit
shall be that concentration which can
be counted with a precision of plus or
minus 100 percent  at the 95 percent
confidence level (1.96a where  a  is the
standard deviation of the net counting-
rate of the sample).
  (1)  To  determine  compliance  with
§141.66(b),  (c),  and (e)  the detection
limit shall not exceed the  concentra-
tions in Table B to this paragraph.

TABLE  B.—DETECTION  LIMITS FOR  GROSS
  ALPHA PARTICLE ACTIVITY, RADIUM 226, RA-
  DIUM 228, AND URANIUM
Contaminant
Gross alpha particle activity
Radium 226 .
Radium 228 . ...
Uranium .. ....
Detection
limit
3 pCi/L
1 pCi/L
1 pCi/L
Reserve
  (2)  To  determine compliance  with
§141.66(d) the detection limits shall not
exceed  the  concentrations  listed  in
Table C to this paragraph.

  TABLE C—DETECTION LIMITS FOR MAN-MADE
    BETA PARTICLE AND PHOTON EMITTERS
Radionuclide
Tritium
Strontium-89
Strontium-90
lodine-131
Cesium-134
Gross beta
Other radionuclides
Detection limit
1,OOOpCi/1
10 pCi/1
2 pCi/1
1 pCi/1
10 pCi/1
4pCi/1.
Vio of the applicable limit
  (d)  To  judge  compliance  with  the
maximum contaminant levels listed in
§141.66, averages of data shall be used
and shall be rounded to the same num-
ber of significant figures as the max-
imum contaminant level for the sub-
stance in question.
  (e) The  State has the authority to de-
termine compliance or initiate enforce-
ment action based upon analytical re-
sults  or other information compiled by
their  sanctioned representatives and
agencies.

[41 FR 28404,  July  9, 1976, as amended at 45
FR 57345, Aug-. 27,  1980; 62 FR  10173, Mar. 5,
1997; 65 FR 76745, Dec. 7, 2000; 67 FR 65250.
Oct. 23, 2002]

  EFFECTIVE DATE  NOTE 1: At 69 FR 31012,
June 2, 2004, §141.25 was amended in the table
in paragraph (a) by revising1 the entry for
uranium, revising footnotes 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and
12, and adding footnote 13, effective Aug. 31,
2004. For the convenience of the user, the re-
vised and added text is set forth as follows:
                                     385

-------
§141.25, Note
                40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 %
 '>
 I
 u
 '
             m o

             ID 3

             id.

             ss
             Is- r--
             O *-




             Oi O)

                          ^SflcSSFiKgggor;


                          !S?s|l^s;5g<3«^«;.°i
                          jin.2™ 3> 0) ram rc ^ LU ° cJSO^S^S




                          i=lfSs|?;ssi|glSSg«-t
Iplflll^lllil^is^i^"
!t*i
siii
r'sli
                               386

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.26
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE 2: At 69 FB 38855,
June 29, 2004,  §141.25 was amended In para-
graph (c)(l) in the entry for uranium in the
second column of Table B by removing the
word "reserve" and adding in its place "1 ng/
L", effective July 29, 2004.

§ 141.26  Monitoring   frequency   and
    compliance requirements  for radio-
    nuclides  in  community water sys-
    tems.
  (a) Monitoring and compliance require-
ments for gross alpha particle activity, ra-
dium-226, radium-228,  and  uranium. (1)
Community   water  systems  (CWSs)
must conduct initial monitoring to de-
termine compliance with §141.66(b), (c),
and (e) by December 31, 2007. For the
purposes of monitoring for gross alpha
particle activity, radium-226, radium-
228,  uranium, and  beta particle  and
photon radioactivity in drinking water,
"detection limit"  is  defined  as  in
§141.25(c).
  (i) Applicability and sampling location
for existing community water systems or
sources. All existing CWSs using ground
water, surface water or systems using
both ground  and surface water (for the
purpose of this  section  hereafter  re-
ferred to as  systems) must  sample at
every  entry  point to the distribution
system  that  is  representative  of  all
sources being used (hereafter called a
sampling point)  under normal  oper-
ating  conditions.  The  system  must
take each sample at the same sampling
point unless  conditions make another
sampling point more representative of
each source or the State has designated
a  distribution system location, in ac-
cordance with paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(C) of
this section.
  (ii) Applicability and sampling location
for new  community  water  systems or
sources. All new CWSs or CWSs that use
a new source of water must begin to
conduct initial monitoring for the new
source  within the first quarter  after
initiating use of the source. CWSs must
conduct  more   frequent  monitoring
when  ordered by  the State in  the event
of  possible  contamination   or when
changes in the distribution system or
treatment processes  occur which may
increase the  concentration of radioac-
tivity in finished water.
  (2) Initial  monitoring. Systems must
conduct initial  monitoring for gross
alpha particle activity, radium-226, ra-
dium-228, and uranium as follows:
  (i) Systems without  acceptable his-
torical  data, as defined below,  must
collect four consecutive quarterly sam-
ples at  all sampling points before De-
cember 31, 2007.
  (ii) Grandfathering of  data:  States
may allow historical monitoring data
collected at a sampling point to satisfy
the initial monitoring requirements for
that sampling point, for  the following-
situations.
  (A) To satisfy initial monitoring re-
quirements,  a  community water  sys-
tem having only one entry point to the
distribution system may  use the moni-
toring, data from  the last compliance
monitoring period  that, began between
June 2000 and December 8, 2003.
  (B)  To satisfy initial monitoring re-
quirements,  a  community water  sys-
tem with  multiple  entry points  and
having  appropriate  historical  moni-
toring data for each entry point to the
distribution system may  use the moni-
toring data from  the last compliance
monitoring period  that began between
June 2000 and December 8, 2003.
  (C) To satisfy initial monitoring re-
quirements,  a  community water  sys-
tem with  appropriate  historical data
for a representative point in the dis-
tribution system  may  use the  moni-
toring data from  the last compliance
monitoring period  that began between
June  2000  and  December 8,  2003, pro-
vided that the State finds that the his-
torical data satisfactorily demonstrate
that each entry point to the distribu-
tion system is  expected to be  in com-
pliance based upon the historical data
and reasonable assumptions about the
variability of contaminant levels be-
tween  entry points. The State must
make a written finding indicating how
the data conforms to the these require-
ments.
  (iii) For gross alpha particle activity,
uranium,  radium-226, and radium-228
monitoring, the State  may waive the
final two quarters  of initial monitoring
for a sampling point if the results of
the samples from  the previous  two
quarters are below the detection limit.
  (iv) If the average of the initial moni-
toring results for  a sampling point is
above the MCL, the  system must  col-
lect and  analyze quarterly samples at
                                     387

-------
§141.26
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
that sampling  point until the system
has results from four consecutive quar-
ters that are at or below the MCL, un-
less the system enters into  another
schedule as part of  a  formal compli-
ance agreement with the State.
  (3) Reduced monitoring:  States  may
allow community water systems to re-
duce  the  future frequency  of moni-
toring from once every three years to
once every  six  or nine years at  each
sampling point, based on the following
criteria.
  (i) If the average of the initial moni-
toring  results  for   each  contaminant
(i.e., gross alpha particle activity, ura-
nium,  radium-226,   or  radium-228) is
below the detection  limit specified in
Table  B,  in §141.25(c)(l),  the system
must collect and analyze for that con-
taminant  using at least one  sample at
that sampling point every nine years.
  (ii) For  gross alpha particle activity
and uranium, if the  average of the ini-
tial monitoring results for  each  con-
taminant  is at or above the detection
limit but  at or below % the MCL, the
system  must collect and analyze for
that contaminant using  at  least  one
sample  at that sampling  point every
six years.  For combined radium-226 and
radium-228, the analytical results must
be combined. If the average of the com-
bined initial monitoring results for ra-
dium-226 and radium-228 is at or above
the detection limit  but at or below Va
the MCL,  the system must collect and
analyze for  that contaminant using at
least  one  sample   at  that   sampling
point every six years.
  (iii) For gross alpha particle activity
and uranium, if the  average of the ini-
tial monitoring results for  each  con-
taminant is above n/2 the MCL but at or
below the MCL, the  system  must  col-
lect and analyze at least one sample at
that sampling point every three years.
For combined radium-226 and radium-
228,  the  analytical  results  must be
combined. If the average  of  the com-
bined initial monitoring results for ra-
dium-226 and radium-228 is above Vfe the
MCL but at or  below the MCL, the  sys-
tem must collect and analyze at least
one  sample  at that  sampling point
every three years.
  (iv) Systems must use the samples
collected  during  the  reduced moni-
toring period to determine the moni-
toring frequency for subsequent moni-
toring periods (e.g., if a system's sam-
pling point is  on a  nine year moni-
toring period, and the sample result is
above  Vfe  MCL,  then  the next moni-
toring period for that sampling point is
three years).
  (v) If a  system has a monitoring re-
sult that exceeds the MCL while on re-
duced  monitoring, the system  must
collect and analyze quarterly  samples
at that sampling point until the sys-
tem has results from  four consecutive
quarters that are below the MCL,  un-
less the   system enters  into  another
schedule  as part of a formal  compli-
ance agreement  with the State.
  (4) Compositing: To  fulfill quarterly
monitoring  requirements  for  gross
alpha particle activity, radium-226. ra-
dium-228,  or  uranium, a system  may
composite up to four consecutive quar-
terly samples from a single entry point
if analysis is done within a year of the
first sample. States will treat analyt-
ical results from the composited as the
average analytical result to determine
compliance with the MCLs and the fu-
ture monitoring frequency. If the ana-
lytical result   from   the  composited
sample is greater  than  Vfe MCL,  the
State  may direct the system  to take
additional quarterly samples before al-
lowing the system to sample  under a
reduced monitoring schedule.
  (5)  A gross alpha  particle  activity
measurement may be  substituted for
the  required radium-226  measurement
provided that the measured gross alpha
particle activity does not exceed 5 pCi/
1. A gross  alpha  particle activity meas-
urement may be substituted for the re-
quired uranium  measurement provided
that the measured gross alpha particle
activity does not exceed 15 pCi/1. The
gross alpha measurement shall have a
confidence interval of 95% (1.65o, where
a is the standard deviation of the net
counting  rate of the  sample) for ra-
dium-226 and uranium. When a system
uses  a gross alpha  particle  activity
measurement in lieu  of a radium-226
and/or  uranium  measurement,   the
gross alpha particle activity analytical
result will be used to determine the fu-
ture monitoring frequency for radium-
226 and/or uranium. If the gross  alpha
particle activity result is less than de-
tection, V-2. the detection limit will be
                                     388

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.26
used to determine compliance and the
future monitoring frequency.
  (b) Monitoring and compliance require-
ments for beta particle and photon radio-
activity. To determine compliance with
the maximum  contaminant levels in
§141.66(d) for beta particle and photon
radioactivity, a system must monitor
at a frequency as follows:
  (1) Community water systems (both
surface  and ground water) designated
by the State as vulnerable must sample
for beta particle and photon radioac-
tivity. Systems must collect quarterly
samples for beta emitters and annual
samples for tritium  and strontium-90
at each entry point to the distribution
system  (hereafter  called a sampling
point), beginning  within one  quarter
after being notified by  the State. Sys-
tems already designated by  the  State
must  continue to sample  until  the
State reviews  and  either reaffirms or
removes the designation.
  (i) If the gross beta particle activity
minus  the naturally occurring potas-
sium-40 beta particle activity at a sam-
pling point has a running annual aver-
age (computed  quarterly) less  than or
equal to 50 pCi/L (screening level), the
State may reduce  the  frequency of
monitoring at  that sampling point to
once every 3 years. Systems must  col-
lect all samples required in  paragraph
(b)(l) of this section during the reduced
monitoring period.
  (ii) For systems in the vicinity of a
nuclear facility, the  State may  allow
the CWS to utilize environmental sur-
veillance data collected by the nuclear
facility in lieu of monitoring at  the
system's  entry  point(s), where  the
State determines if such data is  appli-
cable  to a particular water system. In
the event that there is a release from a
nuclear facility,  systems  which  are
using surveillance data must  begin
monitoring  at  the community  water
system's entry point(s) in accordance
with paragraph (b)(l) of this section.
  (2) Community water systems  (both
surface  and ground  water) designated
by  the State as utilizing waters con-
taminated by effluents from nuclear fa-
cilities must sample  for beta particle
and  photon  radioactivity.   Systems
must collect quarterly samples for beta
emitters and  iodine-131 and  annual
samples for tritium  and strontium-90
at each entry point to the distribution
system (hereafter  called  a sampling
point),  beginning within  one  quarter
after being notified by the State. Sys-
tems already designated by  the State
as systems using waters contaminated
by  effluents  from  nuclear facilities
must  continue  to sample  until  the
State  reviews and either  reaffirms or
removes the designation.
  (i) Quarterly  monitoring  for gross
beta particle activity shall be based on
the analysis of monthly samples or the
analysis of a composite of three month-
ly   samples.  The   former  is  rec-
ommended.
  (ii) For iodine-131, a composite of five
consecutive daily samples shall be ana-
lyzed once each  quarter. As ordered by
the  State, more frequent monitoring
shall be conducted when iodine-131 is
identified in the finished water.
  (iii)  Annual monitoring for  stron-
tium-90 and tritium shall be  conducted
by  means of the analysis of  a com-
posite  of four  consecutive  quarterly
samples or analysis of four quarterly
samples. The latter procedure  is rec-
ommended.
  (iv) If the gross beta particle activity
beta minus the naturally occurring po-
tassium-40 beta  particle activity at a
sampling  point  has  a running  annual
average (computed quarterly) less than
or equal to 15 pCi/L, the State may re-
duce the  frequency of monitoring  at
that sampling point to every 3 years.
Systems must collect all  samples re-
quired  in paragraph (b)(2)  of this sec-
tion during the reduced monitoring pe-
riod.
  (v) For  systems in  the vicinity of a
nuclear facility,  the  State may allow
the CWS to utilize environmental sur-
veillance data collected by the  nuclear
facility in lieu  of monitoring  at  the
system's  entry   point(s),  where  the
State determines if such data is appli-
cable to a particular  water system. In
the event that there is a release from a
nuclear facility,  systems which  are
using  surveillance data   must  begin
monitoring  at the community  water
system's entry point(s) in accordance
with paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
  (3) Community  water systems des-
ignated by the  State to  monitor for
beta particle and photon radioactivity
can not apply to the State  for a waiver
                                    389

-------
§141.26
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
from the monitoring frequencies speci-
fied in paragraph (b)(l) or (b)(2) of this
section.
  (4) Community  water  systems may
analyze for naturally occurring  potas-
sium-40 beta particle activity from the
same or equivalent sample used for the
gross  beta  particle activity analysis.
Systems are allowed to subtract the
potassium-40  beta   particle  activity
value from the total gross beta particle
activity  value  to  determine  if the
screening level is exceeded. The  potas-
sium-40 beta particle activity must be
calculated  by  multiplying  elemental
potassium concentrations (in mg/L) by
a factor of 0.82.
  (5) If the gross beta particle activity
minus  the naturally occurring  potas-
sium-40 beta particle activity exceeds
the screening level, an analysis  of the
sample must be performed to identify
the  major  radioactive   constituents
present in the sample and the appro-
priate  doses must  be  calculated and
summed  to determine compliance with
§141.66(d)(l), using  the  formula  in
§141.66(d)(2). Doses  must also be cal-
culated  and combined for measured
levels of tritium and strontium  to de-
termine compliance.
  (6) Systems must  monitor monthly
at the sampling point(s) which exceed
the maximum  contaminant level in
§141.66(d) beginning  the month  after
the exceedance  occurs. Systems  must
continue monthly monitoring until the
system has established, by a rolling av-
erage of 3 monthly samples, that the
MCL is being met.  Systems who estab-
lish that the MCL is being met must
return to  quarterly monitoring  until
they meet the requirements set  forth
in paragraph (b)(l)(ii) or (b)(2)(i) of this
section.
  (c) General monitoring and compliance
requirements  for radionuclides. (1) The
State may require more frequent moni-
toring than specified in paragraphs (a)
and (b) of  this section, or may require
confirmation samples at its  discretion.
The results of the initial and confirma-
tion samples will be averaged for use in
compliance determinations.
  (2) Each public  water systems shall
monitor  at the time designated by the
State during each compliance period.
  (3)  Compliance:   Compliance   with
§141.66 (b) through (e) will be  deter-
mined based on the analytical result(s)
obtained at each sampling point. If one
sampling  point  is in violation of an
MCL, the system is in violation of the
MCL.
  (i)  For  systems  monitoring more
than  once per year,  compliance with
the MCL  is determined by  a running
annual average at each sampling point.
If the average of any sampling point is
greater than the MCL, then the system
is out of compliance with the MCL.
  (ii)  For systems monitoring more
than once per year, if any sample  re-
sult will cause the running average to
exceed the MCL at any sample point,
the system is out of compliance with
the MCL immediately.
  (iii) Systems must include all sam-
ples taken and analyzed  under the pro-
visions of this section in  determining
compliance,  even  if  that number  is
greater than the minimum required.
  (iv) If a system does not collect all
required  samples  when  compliance  is
based on  a running annual average  of
quarterly samples, compliance  will be
based on  the running average of the
samples collected.
  (v) If a sample result is less than the
detection limit,  zero  will be used to
calculate  the annual  average, unless a
gross alpha particle  activity is being
used in lieu of radium-226 and/or ura-
nium. If the gross alpha  particle activ-
ity result is less than detection, % the
detection limit will be  used  to  cal-
culate the annual average.
  (4) States have the discretion to de-
lete results of obvious sampling or ana-
lytic errors.
  (5) If the MCL  for radioactivity  set
forth in  §141.66 (b) through  (e) is ex-
ceeded,  the operator of a community
water system must give notice to the
State pursuant  to §141.31 and to the
public as  required by subpart Q of this
part.

[65 PR 76745, Dec. 7, 2000]
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38855, June
29,  2004,  §141.26 was amended by  revising
paragraphs (t>)(2)(iv) and (b)(5) and  in para-
graph  (bX6)  by  removing  the  citation
"(b)(l)(ii)" and adding in its place "(b)dXi)"
and by removing the citation "(b)(2)(i)" and
adding in its place "(b)(2)(iv)", effective July
29, 2004. For the convenience of the user, the
revised text is set forth as follows:
                                     390

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.30
 > 141.26  Monitoring frequency and compli-
   ance requirements  for radionuclides  in
   community water systems.
  (b) * * *
  (2) * * *
  (iv) If the  gross  beta  particle  activity
minus the naturally occurring potassium-40
beta particle  activity at a sampling point
has  a  running  annual  average  (computed
quarterly) less than or equal to 15 pCi/L
(screening' level), the State may reduce the
frequency  of  monitoring at that sampling
point to every 3 years. Systems must collect
the same type of samples  required in para-
graph (b)(2) of this  section during the re-
duced monitoring period.
  (5) If the gross beta particle activity minus
the naturally occurring-  potassium-40  beta
particle activity  exceeds the  appropriate
screening level, an analysis of the sample
must be performed to identify the major ra-
dioactive constituents present in the sample
and the appropriate doses must be calculated
and summed to determine compliance  with
§141.66(d)(l),    using   the   formula    in
§141.66(d)(2). Doses must  also be calculated
and combined for measured levels of tritium
and strontium to determine compliance.
§141.27  Alternate   analytical   tech-
    niques.
  (a)  With  the written  permission of
the State, concurred in by the Admin-
istrator of the U.S. EPA, an alternate
analytical technique may be employed.
An alternate technique shall be accept-
ed only if it is substantially equivalent
to the prescribed test in  both precision
and accuracy as it relates to the  deter-
mination of compliance with any MCL.
The use  of the  alternate analytical
technique shall not decrease the  fre-
quency of monitoring required by  this
part.

[45 FR 57345, Aug. 27, 1980]

§ 141.28  Certified laboratories.
  (a)  For the  purpose of determining'
compliance   with   §§141.21  through
141.27, 141.30, 141.40, 141.74  and  141.89,
samples may be considered only if they
have  been  analyzed  by  a  laboratory
certified  by  the  State  except  that
measurements for alkalinity,  calcium.
conductivity,   disinfectant   residual,
orthophosphate, pH,  silica,  tempera-
ture and turbidity may be performed
by any person acceptable to the State.
  (b) Nothing in this part shall be con-
strued  to  preclude the  State or  any
duly designated representative of the
State  from  taking  samples  or  from
using the results from such samples to
determine compliance by a supplier of
water with the applicable requirements
of this part.
[45 FR 57345, Aug. 27, 1980; 47 FR 10999, Mar.
12, 1982, as amended  at 59 FR 34323, July 1,
1994; 64 FR 67465, Dec. 1, 1999]

§ 141.29  Monitoring   of   consecutive
   public water systems.
  When a public water system supplies
water  to  one  or  more other public
water  systems, the State may modify
the monitoring requirements imposed
by this part to the  extent  that the
interconnection of the systems  justi-
fies treating  them as a  single system
for monitoring purposes. Any modified
monitoring shall  be  conducted pursu-
ant to a schedule specified by the State
and concurred in by the Administrator
of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.

§141.30  Total  trihalomethanes   sam-
   pling, analytical and  other require-
   ments.
  (a) Community  water  system which
serve a population of  10,000 or more in-
dividuals and which add  a  disinfectant
(oxidant) to  the water in  any part of
the drinking  water treatment process
shall analyze  for total trihalomethanes
in accordance  with  this section.  For
systems serving 75,000 or more individ-
uals, sampling' and analyses shall begin
not later than 1 year after the date of
promulgation  of this regulation.  For
systems serving 10,000 to 74,999 individ-
uals, sampling and analyses shall begin
not later than 3 years after the date of
promulgation  of this  regulation.  For
the purpose  of this section, the  min-
imum number of samples required to be
taken by the  system shall  be  based on
the number  of treatment  plants  used
by the system, except that  multiple
wells  drawing raw  water from a single
aquifer may,  with  the State approval,
be considered one  treatment plant for
determining  the minimum number of
                                      391

-------
§141.30
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
samples. All samples taken within an
established frequency shall be collected
within a 24-hour period.
  (b)(l)  For all community water sys-
tems utilizing surface water sources in
whole or in part,  and for all commu-
nity  water  systems  utilizing  only
ground  water sources that  have not
been determined by the Stata to i qual-
ify for the  monitoring requirements of
paragraph.(c)  of this section, analyses
for total trihalomethanes shall be per-
formed  at  quarterly intervals  on at
least four water samples for each treat-
ment plant used  by the system.  At
least 25 percent of the samples shall be
taken at locations within the distribu-
tion system reflecting  the  maximum
residence time of the water in the sys-
tem. The remaining 75 percent shall be
taken  at  representative  locations in
the distribution  system, taking into
account number of persons served, dif-
ferent  sources of  water and different
treatment methods employed. The re-
sults of all  analyses per quarter shall
be  arithmetically  averaged  and  re-
ported to  the State  within 30 days of
the system's  receipt of such results.
Results shall also be reported to EPA
until  such  monitoring  requirements
have been  adopted by  the State.  All
samples collected shall  be used  in the
computation of the average, unless the
analytical  results are invalidated  for
technical reasons. Sampling and anal-
yses shall be conducted  in accordance
with the methods listed in paragraph
(e) of this section.
  (2) Upon  the  written request of a
community water system, the  moni-
toring frequency required by paragraph
(b)(l) of this section may be reduced by
the State to a minimum of one sample
analyzed for TTHMs per quarter taken
at a point in the distribution system
reflecting the maximum residence time
of the  water  in the system, upon a
written determination  by the  State
that the data from  at least  1 year of
monitoring  in accordance with  para-
graph  (b)(l) of this  section and local
conditions   demonstrate  that   total
trihalomethane concentrations will be
consistently below the maximum con-
taminant level.
  (3) If at any time during which the
reduced  monitoring frequency  pre-
scribed under this paragraph applies,
the results  from any  analysis exceed
0.10 mg/1 of TTHMs and such results are
confirmed by at least one check sample
taken promptly  after such results are
received, or if the  system makes any
significant  change to  its  source  of
water or treatment program,  the sys-
tem shall  immediately begin  moni-
toring in accordance with the require-
ments of paragraph (b)(l) of this sec-
tion, which  monitoring shall continue
for at least 1 year before the frequency
may be  reduced again. At the option of
the State, a system's  monitoring fre-
quency  may and should be increased
above the minimum  in those  cases
where it is  necessary  to detect vari-
ations of TTHM levels within the dis-
tribution system.
  (c)(l)  Upon written  request to the
State, a community water system uti-
lizing only ground  water sources may
seek to  have the monitoring frequency
required by paragraph (b)(l) of this sec-
tion reduced to a minimum of one sam-
ple for  maximum TTHM potential per
year for each treatment plant used by
the system taken at a point in the dis-
tribution system reflecting maximum
residence time of the water in the sys-
tem. The  system shall  submit the re-
sults of at least one sample for max-
imum TTHM potential  using the proce-
dure specified in paragraph (g) of this
section. A sample  must be analyzed
from each treatment plant used by the
system  and be taken at a point in the
distribution system reflecting the max-
imum residence time of the water  in
the system. The system's monitoring
frequency may only be reduced upon a
written  determination  by  the  State
that, based upon the data submitted by
the system, the system has a maximum
TTHM potential of less than 0.10 mg/1
and that, based upon an assessment of
the local conditions of the system, the
system  is not likely to approach or ex-
ceed the maximum contaminant level
for total  TTHMs.  The results of all
analyses shall be reported to the  State
within 30  days of the system's receipt
of such  results. Results shall also be re-
ported to  EPA until such monitoring
requirements have been adopted by the
State. All samples collected  shall  be
used for determining whether the sys-
tem must comply with the monitoring
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
                                    392

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.30
section,  unless  the analytical  results
are invalidated for technical reasons.
Sampling and analyses shall  be con-
ducted in accordance with the methods
listed in paragraph (e) of this section.
  (2) If at any time  during- which the
reduced   monitoring  frequency  pre-
scribed under paragraph (c)(l)  of this
section applies, the  results from any
analysis taken by the system for max-
imum TTHM potential  are equal to or
greater than 0.10 mg/1. and such results
are confirmed by  at least one  check
sample  taken promptly after such re-
sults are received, the system shall im-
mediately begin monitoring in accord-
ance  with the  requirements of para-
graph (b) of this section and such moni-
toring shall continue for  at least  one
year before the frequency may be re-
duced again. In the  event of any sig-
nificant  change to the system's raw
water or treatment program, the sys-
tem shall immediately analyze an addi-
tional sample for maximum TTHM po-
tential taken at a point in the distribu-
tion system reflecting  maximum resi-
dence time of the  water in the system
for the purpose of determining whether
the system must comply with the mon-
itoring  requirements of paragraph (b)
of this  section. At the option of the
State, monitoring  frequencies may and
should  be increased above  the min-
imum in those cases where this is nec-
essary to  detect  variation  of TTHM
levels within the distribution system.
  (d) Compliance with §141.12 shall  be
determined based on  a running annual
average of quarterly  samples collected
by  the  system as  prescribed in para-
graph (b)(l) or (2) of this section. If the
average  of  samples  covering  any  12
month period  exceeds  the Maximum
Contaminant  Level,  the  supplier  of
water shall report  to the  State pursu-
ant to §141.31 and notify the public pur-
suant to  subpart  Q.  Monitoring after
public notification shall be at a fre-
quency  designated by  the State and
shall  continue until  a  monitoring
schedule as a  condition  to a variance,
exemption or enforcement action shall
become effective.
  (e) Sampling and analyses made pur-
suant  to this section  shall  be  con-
ducted    by    one   of   the   total
trihalomethanes methods as directed
in §141.24(e), and the Technical Notes on
Drinking Water Methods, EPA-600/R-94-
173,  October 1994,  which  is  available
from NTIS. PB-104766, or in §141.131(b).
Samples    for   TTHM   shall    be
dechlorinated upon collection to pre-
vent     further    production     of
trihalomethanes, according to the pro-
cedures described in the methods, ex-
cept acidification  is  not required if
only THMs or TTHMs are to  be deter-
mined.  Samples  for maximum  TTHM
potential  should not be dechlorinated
or acidified, and should  be  held for
seven days at 25 °C (or above) prior to
analysis.
  (f) Before a community water system
makes any significant modifications to
its existing treatment process for the
purposes of achieving  compliance  with
§141.12,  such system must submit  and
obtain  State  approval  of a detailed
plan setting forth  its  proposed modi-
fication and those safeguards that it
will  implement to ensure that the bac-
teriological quality  of the  drinking
water served by such system will not
be adversely affected by such modifica-
tion. Each  system shall comply  with
the provisions  set  forth in the State-
approved plan.  At a minimum, a State
approved plan shall require the system
modifying its disinfection practice to:
  (1) Evaluate  the  water system for
sanitary  defects  and  evaluate   the
source water for biological quality;
  (2) Evaluate  its  existing treatment
practices  and  consider  improvements
that will  minimize  disinfectant  de-
mand and optimize finished water qual-
ity  throughout  the  distribution  sys-
tem;
  (3) Provide  baseline  water quality
survey data of the distribution system.
Such data should include the results
from monitoring for coliform  and fecal
coliform bacteria,  fecal streptococci,
standard plate  counts at 35 °C  and 20
°C. phosphate,  ammonia nitrog'en and
total organic  carbon.  Virus studies
should be required where source waters
are heavily contaminated  with sewage
effluent;
  (4) Conduct additional monitoring to
assure continued maintenance of opti-
mal  biological  quality  in  finished
water,  for  example, when  chloramines
are introduced as disinfectants or when
pre-chlorination is  being discontinued.
Additional monitoring should also  be
                                    393

-------
§141.31
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
required by the  State for  chlorate,
chlorite  and  chlorine  dioxide  when
chlorine dioxide is used. Standard plate
count analyses should also be required
by the State as appropriate before and
after any modifications;
  (5) Consider inclusion  in the plan of
provisions  to  maintain  an  active  dis-
infectant residual throughout the  dis-
tribution system  at  all times during
and after the modification.
  (g) The water sample for  determina-
tion of maximum total trihalomethane
potential is taken from  a point in the
distribution system that reflects max-
imum residence time. Procedures for
sample  collection  and  handling-  are
given in  the  methods.  No  reducing
agent is added to "quench" the chem-
ical  reaction  producing THMs at  the
time of sample collection. The intent is
to permit the level of THM precursors
to be depleted and the concentration of
THMs to be maximized  for the supply
being tested.  Four experimental  pa-
rameters affecting maximum THM pro-
duction are pH,, temperature, reaction
time and the presence of a disinfectant
residual. These parameters are dealt
with as  follows: Measure the disinfect-
ant residual at the selected  sampling
point. Proceed  only   if  a measurable
disinfectant residual is present. Collect
triplicate 40 ml water samples at the
pH prevailing at the time of sampling,
and prepare a method blank according
to the methods. Seal and store these
samples together for seven days at 25
°C or above.  After this time  period,
open one of the sample containers and
check  for  disinfectant  residual.  Ab-
sence of a  disinfectant residual invali-
dates the sample for further analysis.
Once a  disinfectant residual  has  been
demonstrated,  open   another of  the
sealed  samples and   determine total
THM concentration using an approved
analytical method.
  (h) The requirements  in  paragraphs
(a) through (g) of this section apply to
subpart H  community water  systems
which serve  a population of 10,000 or
more until December 31, 2001. The re-
quirements in paragraphs (a)  through
(g) of this section apply to community
water systems which  use only ground
water not under the direct influence of
surface  water that add  a disinfectant
(oxidant) in any part of the treatment
process' and serve a population of 10,000
or more until December 31, 2003. After
December*- 31, 2003, this section is  no
longer applicable.
[44 FB 68641, Nov. -29, 1979, as amended at 45
FR 15545,  15547, Mar. 11, 1980; 58 FR 41345,
Aug.  3, 1993; 59 FR 62469, Dec. 5, 1994J 60  FR
34085, June 29, 1995; 63 FR 69464, Dec. 16, 1998;
65 FR 26022, May 4, 2000; 66 FR 3776, Jan. 16,
2001]

     Subpart D—Reporting and
          Recordkeeping

§141.31  Reporting requirements.
  (a) Except where a shorter period is
specified in  this part,  the supplier of
water shall  report to the State the  re-
sults of any test measurement or anal-
ysis  required by this part within  (1)
The first ten days following the month
in which  the result is  received, or  (2)
the first ten days  following the end of
the required monitoring period as stip-
ulated by the State, whichever of these
is shortest.
  (b) Except where a different reporting
period is specified in this part, the sup-
plier of water must report to the State
within 48 hours the failure to comply
with  any national  primary  drinking
water regulation (including  failure  to
comply with monitoring requirements)
set forth in this part.
  (c) The supplier of water is not  re-
quired to report  analytical results  to
the State in cases where a State lab-
oratory performs the  analysis and  re-
ports the results  to the State office
which would normally receive such no-
tification from the supplier.
  (d) The public water system, within
10 days' of completing the public notifi-
cation requirements  under Subpart Q
of this part for the initial public notice
and any repeat notices, must submit to
the primacy agency a certification that
it has fully  complied with the public
notification  regulations.  The  public
water system must include  with this
certification a representative copy of
each type of notice  distributed,  pub-
lished, posted,  and made available  to
the persons served by the system and
to the media.
  (e) The water  supply  system shall
submit to the  State within  the time
stated in the  request copies  of any
records   required  to   be  maintained
                                     394

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.32
under  §141.33 hereof or copies of any
documents then in existence which the
State or the Administrator is entitled
to inspect pursuant to the authority of
section 1445 of the Safe Drinking Water
Act  or the  equivalent provisions  of
State law.
[40 FR 59570, Dec. 24, 1975, as amended at 45
FR 57345, Aug.  27, 1980; 65 FR  26022, May 4,
2000]

§ 141.32 Public notification.
  The  requirements in  this  section
apply until the requirements of Sub-
part Q of this part are applicable. Pub-
lic water systems where EPA directly
implements  the  public water  system
supervision program must comply with
the requirements  in Subpart  Q of this
part on October 31, 2000. All other pub-
lic water systems must  comply with
the requirements  in Subpart  Q of this
part on May 6, 2002 or  on the date the
State-adopted  rule  becomes  effective,
whichever comes first.
  (a)   Maximum   contaminant   levels
(MCLs), maximum  residual  disinfectant
levels (MRDLs). The owner  or operator
of a public water system which fails to
comply with an  applicable  MCL  or
treatment  technique  established  by
this part or which fails to comply with
the requirements  of any schedule pre-
scribed pursuant to a  variance  or ex-
emption, shall notify persons served by
the system as follows:
  (1) Except  as provided in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section, the owner or oper-
ator of a public  water system  must
give notice:
  (i)  By publication  in a  daily news-
paper of general circulation in the area
served by the  system as soon  as pos-
sible, but in no case later than 14 days
after  the  violation or failure.  If the
area served by a public  water system is
not served by a daily newspaper of gen-
eral circulation, notice  shall instead be
given by publication in a weekly news-
paper of general circulation serving the
area; and
  (ii) By mail delivery  (by  direct mail
or with the  water bill), or by hand de-
livery, not later than 45 days after the
violation  or  failure. The  State may
waive mail or hand delivery if it deter-
mines  that  the owner or  operator of
the public water  system in  violation
has corrected the violation or failure
within  the 45-day period. The State
must make the waiver in writing and
within the 45-day period; and
  (iii)  For violations  of  the  MCLs  of
contaminants or MRDLs  of disinfect-
ants that  may  pose  an acute  risk  to
human health, by furnishing a  copy  of
the notice to the radio and television
stations serving the area served by the
public water system as soon as possible
but In no case later than 72 hours after
the violation. The following violations
are acute violations:
  (A) Any  violations  specified  by the
State as posing an acute risk to human
health.
  (B) Violation of the MCL for nitrate
or nitrite as defined in §141.62  and de-
termined according to §141.23(i)(3).
  (C) Violation  of the MCL  for  total
coliforms,  when  fecal coliforms or  E.
coll are present in the water distribu-
tion system, as specified in §141.63(b).
  (D) Occurrence of a waterborne dis-
ease outbreak, as defined in §141.2,  in
an unfiltered system subject to the re-
quirements of subpart H of this  part,
after   December    30,    1991    (see
  (E)  Violation of the MBDL for chlo-
rine dioxide as  defined in §141.65  and
determined according to §141.133(c)(2).
  (2) Except as  provided in paragraph
(a)(3)  of this section, following the ini-
tial notice given under paragraph (aXD
of this section,  the owner  or operator
of the public water system must give
notice  at  least   once  every  three
months by mail  delivery (by  direct
mail or with the water bill) or by hand
delivery, for as long as the violation or
failure exists.
  (3)(i) In lieu of  the requirements of
paragraphs  (a) (1) and (2)  of this sec-
tion,  the owner or operator of a com-
munity water system in an area that is
not served by a daily or weekly news-
paper of general circulation must give
notice by hand  delivery or by contin-
uous  posting in  conspicuous   places
within the area served by the system.
Notice by  hand  delivery  or posting
must  begin as soon as possible, but no
later  than  72 hours after the violation
or failure for acute violations (as de-
fined in paragraph (a)(l)(iii) of this sec-
tion), or 14 days after the violation or
failure (for any  other violation). Post-
ing must  continue for as long as  the
                                     395

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
violation or failure exists.  Notice by
hand delivery must be repeated at least
every three months for as long as the
violation or failure exists.
  (ii) In lieu of the requirements of
paragraphs  (a) (1)  and  (2) of this sec-
tion, the owner or operator of a non-
community water system may give no-
tice by hand delivery or by continuous
posting  in  conspicuous  places  within
the area served by the system. Notice
by hand delivery or posting must begin
as soon as possible, but no later than 72
hours after the violation or failure for
acute  violations (as defined in  para-
graph  (a)(l)(iii)  of this section),  or 14
days after the violation or failure (for
any other violation). Posting must con-
tinue for as long  as the violation or
failure exists. Notice by hand delivery
must be repeated at least every  three
months for as long as the violation or
failure exists.
  (b) Other  violations, variances, exemp-
tions. The owner or operator of a public
water  system which fails  to perform
monitoring required by section 1445(a)
of the  Act (including  monitoring re-
quired by the National Primary Drink-
ing  Water  Regulations  (NPDWRs) of
this part), fails to  comply with a test-
ing procedure established by this part,
is subject to a variance granted under
section 1415(a)(l)(A) or 1415(a)(2) of the
Act, or is  subject to an  exemption
under section 1416 of the Act, shall no-
tify persons served by the  system as
follows:
  (1) Except as  provided in paragraph
(b)(3) or (b)(4) of this section, the owner
or operator of a public water system
must give notice within three months
of the  violation or granting of a vari-
ance or exemption by publication in a
daily newspaper of general circulation
in the area served by the system. If the
area served by a public water system is
not served by a daily newspaper of gen-
eral circulation, notice shall instead be
given by publication in a weekly news-
paper of general circulation serving the
area.
  (2) Except as  provided in paragraph
(b)(3) or (b)(4) of this section, following
the  initial  notice given under  para-
graph (b)(l) of this section,  the owner
or operator of the public water system
must give notice at least  once  every
three months by mail delivery (by di-
rect mail or with the water bill) or by
hand delivery, for as long as the viola-
tion exists.  Repeat notice of the exist-
ence of a variance  or  exemption must
be given every three months for as long
as the variance or exemption remains
in effect.
  (3)(i) In lieu of the  requirements of
paragraphs  (b)(l) and (b)(2)  of this  sec-
tion, the  owner or  operator of a com-
munity water system in an area that is
not served by a daily  or weekly news-
paper of general  circulation must give
notice, within three months of the  vio-
lation . or granting of  the variance or
exemption, by hand delivery or by con-
tinuous posting: in conspicuous places
with the area served  by the system.
Posting must continue for as long as
the violation exists or a variance or ex-
emption remains in effect.  Notice by
hand delivery must be repeated at least
every three months for as long as the
violation exists  or  a  variance or ex-
emption remains in effect.
  (ii) In lieu of the requirements of
paragraphs  (b)(l) and (b)(2)  of this  sec-
tion, the owner or operator of a non-
community water system may give no-
tice, within three months of the viola-
tion or  the  granting of the variance or
exemption, by hand delivery or by con-
tinuous posting in conspicuous places-
within the area served by the system.
Posting must continue for as long as
the violation exists, or a variance or
exemption remains in effect. Notice by
hand delivery must be repeated at least
every three months for as long as the
violation exists or  a  variance or ex-
emption remains in effect.
  (4) In  lieu  of the requirements of
paragraphs  (b)(l), (b)(2),  and (b)(3) of
this section, the owner  or operator of a
public water system, at the discretion
of the State, may provide less frequent
notice for minor monitoring violations
as defined by the State, if EPA has ap-
proved  the  State's application for  a
program revision under §142.16. Notice
of such violations must be given no less
frequently than annually.
  (c) Notice to new billing  units.  The
owner  or  operator of  a community
water system must give a copy of the
most recent public notice for any out-
standing  violation  of  any  maximum
contaminant level,  or any  maximum
residual   disinfectant   level,  or  any
                                     396

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.32
treatment  technique requirement,  or
any variance or exemption schedule to
all new billing  units or new hookups
prior to or at the time service begins.
  (d)  General  content of public  notice.
Each notice  required  by this section
must provide a clear and readily under-
standable explanation of the violation,
any  potential adverse  health effects,
the population at risk, the steps that
the public water system is  taking to
correct such  violation,  the necessity
for seeking alternative water supplies,
if any, and any preventive measures
the  consumer  should  take  until  the
violation  is   corrected. Each  notice
shall be conspicuous and shall not con-
tain  unduly technical language, unduly
small  print, or  similar problems that
frustrate  the  purpose  of  the notice.
Each notice shall include the telephone
number of the owner, operator, or des-
ignee of the public water system as a
source of additional information con-
cerning the notice. Where appropriate,
the notice shall be multi-lingual.
  (e) Mandatory  health effects language.
When providing  the information on po-
tential adverse health effects required
by paragraph (d) of this section in no-
tices  of  violations of maximum con-
taminant levels or  treatment  tech-
nique  requirements, or notices  of the
granting or the  continued existence of
exemptions or variances, or  notices of
failure to comply with  a variance or
exemption schedule, the owner or oper-
ator  of a public  water  system shall in-
clude the language specified below for
each  contaminant. (If language  for a
particular contaminant is not specified
below at the  time notice is required,
this paragraph does not apply.)
  (1)    Trichloroethylene.  The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking   water
standards and has determined that tri-
chloroethylene is a  health  concern at
certain levels of exposure. This chem-
ical  is a common metal cleaning  and
dry  cleaning  fluid.  It  generally gets
into  drinking water by improper  waste
disposal. This chemical has been shown
to cause cancer in laboratory animals
such  as rats and mice when the ani-
mals  are  exposed at high levels over
their lifetimes.  Chemicals that  cause
cancer in laboratory animals also may
increase  the risk of cancer  in humans
who are exposed at lower levels  over
long periods of time. EPA has set forth
the enforceable  drinking water stand-
ard for trichloroethylene at 0.005 parts
per million (ppm) to reduce the risk of
cancer or other adverse health effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals. Drinking water which meets
this standard  is associated with  little
to none of this risk and should be con-
sidered safe.
  (2) Carbon  tetrachloride.  The United
States    Environmental   Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking water
standards and has determined that car-
bon  tetrachloride is a  health concern
at  certain  levels  of   exposure.   This
chemical was once a popular household
cleaning fluid. It  generally gets  into
drinking water by improper waste dis-
posal. This chemical has been shown to
cause  cancer in  laboratory animals
such as rats and mice when the ani-
mals are  exposed  at high levels  over
their lifetimes.  Chemicals  that cause
cancer in laboratory animals  also may
increase the risk of cancer in humans
who are exposed at lower levels  over
long periods  of of time. EPA has set
the enforceable  drinking water stand-
ard for carbon  tetrachloride at  0.005
parts per million (ppm) to reduce the
risk of cancer or other adverse health
effects  which have  been  observed  in
laboratory animals.  Drinking water
which meets this standard is associated
with little to  none of this  risk and
should be considered safe.
  (3)  1,2-Dichloroethane.  The United
States    Environmental   Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking water
standards and has determined that 1,2-
dichloroethane is a health concern  at
certain  levels of exposure. This chem-
ical is used as a cleaning fluid for fats,
oils, waxes,  and resins. It generally
gets into drinking water from improper
waste disposal. This chemical has  been
shown  to cause cancer in laboratory
animals  such as rats  and mice  when
the animals are exposed at high levels
over their lifetimes.  Chemicals  that
cause  cancer in  laboratory animals
also may increase the risk of cancer in
humans who  are exposed at lower lev-
els over long periods of time. EPA has
set  the  enforceable  drinking water
standard for 1,2-dichloroethane at  0.005
parts per million (ppm) to reduce the
                                    397

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
risk of cancer or other adverse health
effects which have  been observed  in
laboratory  animals.  Drinking water
which meets this standard is associated
with little  to  none of this risk and
should be considered safe.
  (4) Vinyl chloride. The United States
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA)  sets  drinking water  standards
and has determined that vinyl chloride
is a health concern at certain levels of
exposure. This  chemical is used in in-
dustry and is found in drinking water
as a result of the breakdown of related
solvents.  The  solvents  are  used  as
cleaners  and degreasers of metals and
generally get into drinking water by
improper waste disposal. This chemical
has been associated with  significantly
increased risks  of cancer  among cer-
tain industrial workers who were ex-
posed to relatively  large  amounts  of
this  chemical during their working ca-
reers.  This  chemical  has  also been
shown  to cause cancer in  laboratory
animals when the  animals are  exposed
at high  levels  over their  lifetimes.
Chemicals that cause increased risk of
cancer among exposed industrial work-
ers and in laboratory animals also may
increase  the risk of cancer in  humans
who  are  exposec. at lower levels  over
long periods of time. EPA has set the
enforceable  drinking water standard
for vinyl chloride at 0.002 part per mil-
lion  (ppm) to reduce the risk of cancer
or other adverse health effects which
have been observed in humans and lab-
oratory animals. Drinking water which
meets this standard is associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered safe.
  (5) Benzene. The United States Envi-
ronmental  Protection  Agency (EPA)
sets  drinking water standards  and has
determined  that benzene is a health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This chemical is used as a solvent and
degreaser of metals. It is also  a major
component of gasoline. Drinking water
contamination  generally results from
leaking undergound gasoline and petro-
leum tanks or improper waste disposal.
This chemical has  been associated with
significantly increased risks  of  leu-
kemia among certain industrial work-
ers   who were  exposed  to  relatively
large amounts of this chemical during
their working  careers.  This chemical
has also been shown to cause cancer in
laboratory animals  when the animals
are exposed at high levels over their
lifetimes.   Chemicals that cause  in-
creased risk of cancer among exposed
industrial  workers and  in laboratory
animals also may increase the risk of
cancer in  humans who are exposed at
lower levels over long periods of time.
EPA has set the enforceable drinking
water  standard for benzene  at 0.005
parts per  million (ppm)  to reduce  the
risk of cancer or other adverse  health
effects which have been observed in  hu-
mans and laboratory animals. Drinking
water which meets this standard is as-
sociated with little to none of this risk
and should be considered  safe.
  (6)  1,1-Dichloroethylene.  The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency (EPA)  sets drinking  water
standards  and has determined that  1,1-
dichloroethylene is a health concern at
certain levels of exposure. This chem-
ical is used in industry and is found in
drinking water as a result of the break-
down of related solvents. The solvents
are used as cleaners and degreasers of
metals and generally get into drinking
water by improper waste disposal. This
chemical has been shown to cause liver
and kidney damage in laboratory ani-
mals  such  as rats and mice when  the
animals are exposed at high levels over
their lifetimes. Chemicals  which cause
adverse effects in  laboratory animals
also may  cause adverse  health  effects
in humans who are exposed at  lower
levels over long periods  of time. EPA
has set the enforceable drinking water
standard  for  1,1-dichloroethylene   at
0.007 parts  per million (ppm) to  reduce
the risk of these adverse health  effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals. Drinking  water which  meets
this standard  is associated with little
to none of this risk and should be con-
sidered safe.
  (7) Para-dichlorobenzene.  The United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency (EPA)  sets drinking  water
standards   and has determined that
para-dichlorobenzene is  a  health con-
cern at certain levels of  exposure. This
chemical  is  a component  of deodor-
izers, moth  balls,  and  pesticides.  It
generally  gets into  drinking water  by
improper waste disposal.  This chemical
                                    398

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.32
has been shown to cause liver and kid-
ney damage in laboratory animals such
as rats and mice  when the animals are
exposed to high levels  over their life-
times. Chemicals which cause adverse
effects in laboratory animals also may
cause adverse health effects in humans
who are exposed at lower  levels over
long periods of time. EPA  has set the
enforceable  drinking  water  standard
for para-dichlorobenzene at 0.075 parts
per million (ppm) to reduce the risk of
these adverse health effects which have
been  observed in laboratory animals.
Drinking   water   which   meets  this
standard  is  associated with little  to
none of this risk  and should be consid-
ered safe.
  (8) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane.  The  United
States    Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking  water
standards and has determined that the
1,1,1-trichloroethane is a  health con-
cern at certain levels of exposure. This
chemical  is used  as  a  cleaner and
degreaser of metals.  It generally gets
into drinking water by  improper waste
disposal. This chemical has been shown
to damage the liver, nervous  system,
and  circulatory system of laboratory
animals such as  rats and  mice when
the animals are exposed at high levels
over their lifetimes. Some industrial
workers who were exposed to relatively
large amounts of this chemical during
their working careers  also suffered
damage to the liver, nervous  system,
and  circulatory   system.   Chemicals
which cause  adverse effects among ex-
posed industrial workers and in labora-
tory animals also  may cause  adverse
health effects in humans who are ex-
posed at lower levels over long periods
of time.  EPA has set the  enforceable
drinking  water standard for 1,1,1-tri-
chloroethane at 0.2 parts  per million
(ppm) to  protect  against  the  risk  of
these adverse health effects which have
been observed in humans  and labora-
tory animals.  Drinking water which
meets this standard is associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered safe.
  (9) Fluoride.
  [NOTE: EPA is not specifying language that
must be included in a public notice for a vio-
lation of the fluoride maximum contaminant
level in this section because  §143.5 of this
part includes the necessary information. See
paragraph (f) of this section.]
  (10) Microbiological  contaminants  (for
use when there is a violation of the
treatment  technique requirements for
filtration and disinfection in subpart H
or subpart P of this part). The United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking  water
standards and has determined that the
presence of  microbiological contami-
nants are a health concern at certain
levels  of exposure.  If  water is inad-
equately treated,  microbiological con-
taminants in that  water may cause dis-
ease.  Disease symptoms  may  include
diarrhea, cramps,  nausea, and possibly
jaundice, and any  associated headaches
and fatigue. These symptoms, however,
are not  just  associated with  disease-
causing organisms in drinking water,
but also may be caused by a number of
factors   other  than   your drinking
water. EPA has set enforceable  require-
ments for  treating drinking water to
reduce the  risk of these adverse health
effects. Treatment such as filtering and
disinfecting the water  removes or de-
stroys microbiological contaminants.
Drinking  water which is  treated  to
meet  EPA requirements is associated
with  little  to none  of this risk  and
should be considered safe.
  (11) Total coliforms (To be used when
there is  a  violation  of §141.63(a),  and
not  a  violation  of  §141.63(b)).  The
United States Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) sets drinking water
standards and has determined that the
presence of total coliforms is a possible
health concern.  Total coliforms  are
common in the environment and are
generally not harmful themselves. The
presence of these  bacteria in drinking
water, however, generally is a result of
a problem with water treatment or the
pipes  which  distribute  the water,  and
indicates that the water  may  be con-
taminated  with  organisms  that  can
cause disease. Disease  symptoms may
include  diarrhea,  cramps,  nausea,  and
possibly  jaundice, and  any associated
headaches  and  fatigue. These symp-
toms, however, are not just associated
with  disease-causing  organisms  in
drinking water, but also may be caused
by a number of factors other than your
drinking water. EPA has set an en-
forceable drinking water  standard for
total  coliforms to reduce  the  risk of
these  adverse health effects. Under this
                                    399

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
standard,  no more than 5.0 percent of
the samples collected  during a month
can contain these bacteria, except that
systems collecting fewer than 40 sam-
ples/month  that have one  total  coli-
form-positive  sample  per  month  are
not violating the standard. Drinking
water  which  meets this standard is
usually not associated with a health
risk from disease-causing bacteria  and
should be considered safe.
  (12)  Fecal Coliforms/E. coli (To be used
when  there  is a violation of §141.63(b)
or both §141.63 (a) and (b)). The United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking  water
standards and has determined that the
presence  of fecal coliforms or E. coli is
a serious health concern.  Fecal  coli-
forms  and  E. coli  are generally  not
harmful themselves, but their presence
in drinking water  is  serious because
they usually are associated with sew-
age or animal wastes.  The presence of
these bacteria in drinking water is gen-
erally a result of a problem with water
treatment or the pipes which distribute
the water, and indicates that the water
may be contaminated with organisms
that can cause disease. Disease symp-
toms  may  include  diarrhea, cramps,
nausea, and possibly jaundice, and as-
sociated  headaches and fatigue. These
symptoms, however, are not just asso-
ciated with disease-causing organisms
in drinking  water,  but also may be
caused by a number of factors  other
than your drinking water. EPA has set
an enforceable drinking water standard
for fecal coliforms and E. coli to reduce
the risk of these adverse health effects.
Under this standard all drinking water
samples must be free of these bacteria.
Drinking  water  which  meets   this
standard is associated with little or
none of this risk and should be consid-
ered safe. State and local  health au-
thorities  recommend  that  consumers
take the following precautions: [To be
inserted  by the public water system,
according to instructions from State or
local authorities].
  (13)  Lead. The United States Environ-
mental Protection  Agency  (EPA) sets
drinking water standards and has de-
termined that lead is a health concern
at certain  exposure levels. Materials
that contain lead have frequently been
used in the  construction of water sup-
ply distribution systems, and plumbing
systems  in  private  homes  and  other
buildings. The most  commonly found
materials include service lines, pipes,
brass and bronze fixtures, and solders
and fluxes. Lead in these materials can
contaminate drinking water as a result
of the corrosion that  takes place when
water comes into contact with  those
materials. Lead can cause a variety of
adverse health effects in humans. At
relatively low levels of exposure, these
effects may include interference with
red blood cell chemistry, delays in nor-
mal  physical and mental development
in babies and young children, slight
deficits in the attention  span, hearing,
and learning abilities of children, and
slight increases in the blood pressure of
some adults. EPA's national primary
drinking water regulation requires all
public  water systems to optimize cor-
rosion  control to minimize  lead con-
tamination  resulting from  the corro-
sion of  plumbing materials.  Public
water systems serving 50,000 people or
fewer that  have  lead  concentrations
below 15  parts per billion (ppb) in more
than 90% of  tap water samples  (the
EPA  "action  level") have   optimized
their corrosion control treatment. Any
water system that exceeds  the action
level must  also  monitor their  source
water to determine whether treatment
to remove lead in source water is need-
ed. Any water system that continues to
exceed the action level  after installa-
tion of corrosion control and/or source
water treatment must  eventually  re-
place all lead service lines contributing
in excess of 15 (ppb) of lead to drinking
water.  Any  water system that exceeds
the action level must also undertake a
public  education  program  to inform
consumers of ways  they can  reduce
their exposure to potentially high lev-
els of lead in drinking water.
  (14) Copper. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking  water standards and has
determined that copper is a health con-
cern at certain exposure levels. Copper,
a reddish-brown metal, is often used to
plumb   residential  and commercial
structures that are connected to water
distribution systems. Copper contami-
nating drinking  water as a corrosion
byproduct occurs as  the result of  the
corrosion of copper pipes that remain
                                    400

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.32
in contact with water for a prolonged
period of time.  Copper is an essential
nutrient, but at high doses it has been
shown to cause stomach and intestinal
distress, liver and kidney damage, and
anemia. Persons with Wilson's disease
may be at a higher risk of  health ef-
fects  due to copper  than the general
public. EPA's national primary drink-
ing water regulation requires all public
water systems to install optimal corro-
sion control to minimize copper con-
tamination  resulting  from the corro-
sion  of  plumbing  materials.  Public
water systems  serving 50,000 people  or
fewer that have copper concentrations
below  1.3 parts per  million  (ppm)  in
more  than 90% of tap water samples
(the EPA "action level") are  not re-
quired  to install  or  improve  their
treatment. Any water system that ex-
ceeds the action level must  also mon-
itor their source  water to  determine
whether treatment to remove copper in
source water is needed.
  (15) Asbestos. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking water  standards and has
determined that asbestos fibers greater
than  10 micrometers  in  length  are a
health concern at  certain levels  of ex-
posure. Asbestos is a naturally occur-
ring mineral.  Most  asbestos fibers  in
drinking water are  less than 10 mi-
crometers in length and occur in drink-
ing water from natural sources and
from corroded asbestos-cement pipes in
the distribution system.  The  major
uses of asbestos were in the production
of cements,  floor tiles, paper products,
paint, and caulking; in transportation-
related applications; and in the produc-
tion of textiles and plastics. Asbestos
was once a popular insulating and fire
retardent material. Inhalation studies
have shown that various forms of as-
bestos have produced lung tumors  in
laboratory animals.  The available in-
formation on the risk  of  developing
gastrointestinal tract  cancer associ-
ated with the  ingestion  of asbestos
from drinking water  is limited. Inges-
tion of intermediate-range  chrysotile
asbestos fibers greater than 10 microm-
eters in length is associated with caus-
ing benign tumors  in male rats. Chemi-
cals that cause cancer in  laboratory
animals also may  increase the risk  of
cancer in humans who are exposed over
long periods  of time. EPA has set the
drinking water standard for asbestos at
7 million long fibers per liter to reduce
the potential risk  of  cancer  or other
adverse health effects which have been
observed in laboratory animals. Drink-
ing water which meets the EPA stand-
ard is associated with  little to none of
this risk and should be considered safe
with respect to asbestos.
  (16) Barium. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined  that barium is   a health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This inorganic chemical  occurs natu-
rally  in some aquifers that  serve  as
sources of ground water. It is  also used
in  oil and  gas  drilling  muds,  auto-
motive  paints,  bricks, tiles   and jet
fuels. It generally  gets into  drinking
water after dissolving from  naturally
occurring minerals  in the ground. This
chemical  may damage the heart and
cardiovascular system, and is  associ-
ated with high  blood  pressure in lab-
oratory animals  such  as  rats exposed
to high levels during their lifetimes. In
humans, EPA believes that effects from
barium on blood pressure should  not
occur below 2 parts per million (ppm)
in drinking  water.  EPA  has  set  the
drinking water standard for barium at
2 parts per million (ppm) to protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking water that meets the
EPA standard is  associated with little
to none of this  risk and  is considered
safe with respect to barium.
  (17)  Cadmium. The United States En-
vironmental  Protection Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined that  cadmium is  a health
concern at certain  levels of  exposure.
Food  and the smoking of tobacco are
common sources of general  exposure.
This inorganic metal is a contaminant
in the metals used to galvanize pipe. It
generally  gets into water by  corrosion
of galvanized pipes  or   by  improper
waste disposal. This chemical  has been
shown to damage the kidney in ani-
mals such as  rats and mice when  the
animals are exposed at high levels over
their lifetimes. Some industrial work-
ers who  were exposed  to relatively
large amounts of this chemical during
working  careers  also suffered damage
                                    401

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
to the kidney. EPA has set the drink-
ing water standard  for  cadmium  at
0.005 parts per million (ppm) to protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking water that meets the
EPA standard is  associated with little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe with respect to cadmium.
  (18) Chromium.  The United States En-
vironmental Protection Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined that chromium is a health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This inorganic metal occurs naturally
in the ground and is  often used in the
electroplating of metals. It generally
gets into  water from runoff from old
mining operations and improper waste
disposal from  plating operations.  This
chemical  has  been shown to  damage
the kidney, nervous  system, and the
circulatory system of laboratory ani-
mals  such as rats and  mice when the
animals  are  exposed  at high  levels.
Some  humans who  were exposed  to
high  levels  of this chemical suffered
liver  and kidney damage, dermatitis
and respiratory problems. EPA has set
the drinking water standard for chro-
mium at 0.1 parts per million (ppm) to
protect against  the risk of these ad-
verse  health  effects. Drinking water
that meets the EPA standard is associ-
ated with little to none  of this risk and
is considered safe with respect to chro-
mium.
  (19) Mercury. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined that  mercury  is a  health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This  inorganic metal is used in  elec-
trical  equipment  and  some  water
pumps. It usually gets into water as a
result of improper waste disposal. This
chemical  has  been shown to  damage
the kidney of  laboratory animals such
as rats when the  animals  are  exposed
at high levels over their lifetimes. EPA
has set the drinking water standard for
mercury   at  0.002  parts  per  million
(ppm) to  protect  against  the  risk of
these adverse  health  effects. Drinking
water that meets  the EPA standard is
associated with  little to  none  of this
risk and is considered safe with respect
to mercury.
  (20) Nitrate. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined that nitrate poses an acute
health concern at certain levels of ex-
posure. Nitrate is used in fertilizer and
is found in sewage and wastes from
human and/or farm animals and gen-
erally  gets  into  drinking  water from
those activities. Excessive  levels of ni-
trate in drinking water have caused se-
rious illness and  sometimes death  in
infants under six  months  of age. The
serious illness in infants is caused  be-
cause nitrate is converted to nitrite in
the body. Nitrite interferes with the
oxygen carrying capacity of the child's
blood. This is an acute disease in that
symptoms can develop rapidly in  in-
fants. In  most cases, health deterio-
rates over a period of days. Symptoms
include shortness  of breath  and blue-
ness of the  skin. Clearly,  expert med-
ical advice  should be sought  imme-
diately if these symptoms occur. The
purpose of this notice is to encourage
parents and  other responsible parties
to  provide infants with an alternate
source of drinking water.  Local and
State health authorities are the best
source for information concerning  al-
ternate sources  of drinking  water  for
infants.  EPA  has set  the drinking
water standard at 10 parts per million
(ppm) for nitrate to protect against the
risk of these adverse effects. EPA has
also set a drinking water standard for
nitrite at 1 ppm. To allow for the fact
that the toxicity of nitrate and nitrite
are additive, EPA has also established
a standard for the sum of nitrate and
nitrite at 10 ppm.  Drinking water that
meets the EPA standard is associated
with little to none of this risk and is
considered safe with respect to  nitrate.
  (21) Nitrite. The  United States Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined that nitrite poses an acute
health concern at certain levels of  ex-
posure. This inorganic chemical is used
in fertilizers and is found in sewage and
wastes from humans  and/or  farm ani-
mals and  generally gets into drinking
water as  a  result of those activities.
While  excessive  levels  of nitrite  in
drinking water have not been observed,
other sources of nitrite have caused se-
rious illness and  sometimes death  in
infants under six  months  of agre. The
                                    402

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.32
serious illness in infants is caused be-
cause nitrite interferes  with the  oxy-
gen  carrying1  capacity of the  child's
blood.  This is an acute disease in that
symptoms  can develop  rapidly. How-
ever, in most cases, health  deteriorates
over a  period of days. Symptoms in-
clude shortness of breath and blueness
of the skin. Clearly, expert medical ad-
vice should be sought immediately if
these symptoms occur. The purpose of
this notice is to encourage parents and
other responsible parties to provide in-
fants with an alternate source of drink-
ing water. Local and State health au-
thorities are the best source for infor-
mation concerning alternate  sources of
drinking water for infants.  EPA  has set
the drinking water standard at 1 part
per million (ppm) for nitrite  to protect
against the risk of these  adverse ef-
fects.  EPA  has  also  set  a  drinking
water  standard  for nitrate (converted
to nitrite in humans) at 10  ppm and for
the  sum of nitrate and nitrite at 10
ppm. Drinking water  that meets the
EPA standard is associated with little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe with respect to nitrite.
  (22) Selenium. The United States En-
vironmental Protection Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined that  selenium  is a  health
concern at certain high levels of expo-
sure. Selenium is also an essential nu-
trient  at low  levels of exposure.  This
inorganic chemical is  found  naturally
in food and soils and  is used in  elec-
tronics,  photocopy  operations,   the
manufacture of glass, chemicals, drugs,
and as a fungicide and a feed additive.
In humans,  exposure to  high levels of
selenium over a long period of time has
resulted in a number of adverse health
effects, including a loss  of feeling and
control in the arms and  legs. EPA has
set the  drinking water standard for se-
lenium  at 0.05 parts per  million (ppm)
to protect against the risk  of these ad-
verse health effects. Drinking water
that meets the EPA standard is  associ-
ated with little to none of this risk and
is considered safe with respect to  sele-
nium.
  (23) Acrylamide.  The  United  States
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA)  sets  drinking  water  standards
and has determined that acrylamide is
a health concern at certain levels  of
exposure. Polymers  made  from acryl-
amide  are  sometimes  used to  treat
water  supplies to remove particulate
contaminants.  Acrylamide  has  been
shown  to cause cancer  in laboratory
animals  such as rats  and mice  when
the animals are exposed at high levels
over their  lifetimes.  Chemicals that
cause  cancer in  laboratory animals
also may increase the risk of cancer in
humans who are exposed over long pe-
riods of  time. Sufficiently large  doses
of acrylamide are known to cause neu-
rological  injury.  EPA  has  set  the
drinking water standard for acrylamide
using a treatment technique to reduce
the risk  of cancer  or other adverse
health   effects which  have  been  ob-
served   in  laboratory  animals.  This
treatment technique limits the amount
of acrylamide in the polymer and  the
amount of the polymer which may be
added to drinking water to remove par-
ticulates.  Drinking   water  systems
which  comply  with  this  treatment
technique have little to no risk and are
considered safe with respect to acryl-
amide.
  (24) AlacMor. The United States  Envi-
ronmental  Protection Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and  has
determined  that  alachlor  is a health
concern at  certain levels of exposure.
This organic chemical  is a widely used
pesticide. When soil  and climatic con-
ditions are favorable, alachlor may  get
into drinking water by runoff into sur-
face water or by leaching  into ground
water.  This chemical has  been shown
to cause cancer in laboratory animals
such as  rats and mice when the ani-
mals are exposed  at high levels over
their lifetimes.  Chemicals that  cause
cancer in laboratory animals also may
increase  the risk of  cancer in humans
who are exposed over long periods of
time. EPA has set the drinking water
standard for alachlor at 0.002 parts  per
million (ppm) to reduce the risk of can-
cer or other adverse  health  effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals.  Drinking  water  that  meets
this standard is associated with  little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe with respect to alachlor.
  (25) Aldicarb. The United States  Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and  has
determined  that  aldicarb  is a health
                                    403

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
concern at certain levels of exposure.
Aldicarb is a  widely used  pesticide.
Under certain soil and climatic condi-
tions (e.g., sandy soil and high rain-
fall),  aldicarb may leach into ground
water  after normal agricultural appli-
cations to crops such as  potatoes or
peanuts or may  enter drinking water
supplies as a result of surface runoff.
This chemical has been shown to dam-
age the nervous  system in laboratory
animals such as rats  and dogs exposed
to high levels. EPA has  set the drink-
ing water standard for aldicarb at 0.003
parts  per  million (ppm) to  protect
against the risk  of adverse health ef-
fects. Drinking water that meets the
EPA standard is  associated with little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe with respect  to aldicarb.
  (26)  Aldicarb  sulfoxide. The  United
States   Environmental  Protection
Agency  (EPA)   sets   drinking  water
standards  and has  determined  that
aldicarb sulfoxide is  a health concern
at certain levels  of exposure. Aldicarb
is a  widely  used pesticide. Aldicarb
sulfoxide in ground water is  primarily
a breakdown product of aldicarb. Under
certain soil  and climatic  conditions
(e.g.,  sandy  soil and  high  rainfall),
aldicarb   sulfoxide  may  leach  into
ground water after normal agricultural
applications to crops such as potatoes
or  peanuts  or   may  enter drinking
water  supplies  as a  result of surface
runoff. This chemical has been shown
to damage the  nervous system in  lab-
oratory animals  such as rats and dogs
exposed to high levels. EPA has set the
drinking water  standard for aldicarb
sulfoxide  at  0.004 parts per  million
(ppm) to protect against  the risk of ad-
verse health effects.  Drinking water
that meets the EPA standard is associ-
ated with little to none of this risk and
is  considered  safe  with  respect  to
aldicarb sulfoxide.
  (27)  Aldicarb   sulfone.   The  United
States   Environmental  Protection
Agency  (EPA)   sets   drinking  water
standards  and has  determined  that
aldicarb sulfone is a health concern at
certain levels of exposure. Aldicarb is a
widely used pesticide. Aldicarb sulfone
is  formed from the  breakdown  of
aldicarb and is considered for registra-
tion as a  pesticide  under the  name
aldoxycarb. Under certain soil and cli-
matic conditions (e.g.,  sandy soil and
high rainfall), aldicarb  sulfone  may
leach into ground water  after normal
agricultural applications to crops such
as potatoes or peanuts or may enter
drinking water supplies as a result of
surface runoff. This  chemical has been
shown  to damage the nervous system
in laboratory animals such as rats and
dogs exposed  to high levels.  EPA has
set the  drinking water  standard for
aldicarb  sulfone at 0.002 parts per mil-
lion  (ppm) to  protect against the risk
of adverse  health  effects..  Drinking
water that meets the EPA standard is
associated with little to  none of this
risk and  is considered safe with respect
to aldicarb sulfone.
  (28) Atrazine. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets  drinking  water  standards and has
determined  that  atrazine is  a  health
concern  at certain levels  of exposure.
This organic chemical  is  a  herbicide.
When soil and climatic conditions are
favorable, atrazine may get into drink-
ing water by runoff  into surface  water
or by leaching into ground water. This
chemical has been shown  to  affect off-
spring  of rats and the heart of dogs.
EPA has set the drinking water stand-
ard for atrazine at 0.003 parts per mil-
lion  (ppm) to  protect against the risk
of these  adverse health effects. Drink-
ing water that meets the EPA standard
is associated with little to none of this
risk and  is considered safe with respect
to atrazine.
  (29) Carbofuran. The  United  States
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA)  sets  drinking water  standards
and has  determined  that  carbofuran is
a  health concern at certain  levels  of
exposure. This organic chemical is  a
pesticide. When soil and climatic con-
ditions are favorable, carbofuran. may
get into  drinking water by runoff into
surface   water or   by  leaching  into
ground water.. This  chemical has been
shown  to damage the nervous and re-
productive systems  of laboratory ani-
mals such as rats and mice exposed at
high levels over their lifetimes.  Some
humans who were exposed to relatively
large amounts of this chemical during
their working careers  also suffered
damage to the nervous  system. Effects
on the nervous system are generally
rapidly   reversible.   EPA  has set the
                                     404

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.32
drinking water standard for carbofuran
at 0.04 parts per million (ppm) to pro-
tect against the risk of these adverse
health  effects.  Drinking  water  that
meets the EPA standard is associated
with little to none of this risk and is
considered   safe   with  respect   to
carbofuran.
  (30) Chlordane. The United States En-
vironmental Protection Agency  (EPA
sets drinking water standards and has
determined  that chlordane is a health
concern at  certain levels of exposure.
This  organic chemical is  a  pesticide
used to control termites.  Chlordane is
not very mobile in soils. It usually gets
into drinking" water  after application
near  water  supply intakes or wells.
This chemical has been shown to cause
cancer in laboratory  animals such  as
rats and mice when the animals are ex-
posed at  high levels  over  their  life-
times. Chemicals that cause cancer in
laboratory animals also may increase
the risk of  cancer in humans who are
exposed over long periods of time.  EPA
has set the drinking water standard for
chlordane at 0.002 parts per million
(ppm) to reduce the risk  of cancer  or
other adverse health effects which  have
been  observed in  laboratory  animals.
Drinking  water that meets the  EPA
standard is  associated with  little  to
none of this risk and is considered safe
with respect to chlordane.
  (31)  Dibromochloropropane  (DBCP).
The United  States Environmental  Pro-
tection  Agency (EPA) sets  drinking
water  standards  and  has  determined
that DBCP is a health  concern at cer-
tain levels  of exposure. This organic
chemical was once a popular pesticide.
When soil and climatic conditions are
favorable, dibromochloropropane  may
get into drinking water by runoff into
surface  water or  by  leaching  into
ground water. This chemical has  been
shown to cause cancer in  laboratory
animals such as rats and mice  when
the animals are exposed at high levels
over  their  lifetimes.  Chemicals  that
cause  cancer in  laboratory  animals
also may increase the risk of cancer in
humans who are exposed over long pe-
riods of time. EPA has set the drinking1
water standard for DBCP at 0.0002 parts
per million (ppm) to reduce  the risk of
cancer or other adverse health effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals. Drinking water  that meets
the EPA  standard is  associated with
little to none of this risk and is consid-
ered safe with respect to DBCP.
  (32)  o-Dichlorobenzene.  The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking  water
standards and has determined that o-
dichlorobenzene is a health concern at
certain levels of exposure. This organic
chemical is used as a solvent in  the
production of pesticides and dyes. It
generally gets into water by improper
waste disposal. This chemical has been
shown to damage the liver, kidney and
the blood cells of laboratory animals
such as rats and mice  exposed to high
levels during their lifetimes. Some in-
dustrial workers who  were  exposed to
relatively large amounts of this chem-
ical  during  working careers also  suf-
fered damage to the  liver, nervous sys-
tem, and circulatory system. EPA has
set the drinking water standard for o-
dichlorobenzene at 0.6 parts per million
(ppm)  to  protect  against the  risk  of
these adverse  health effects. Drinking
water that meets the EPA standard is
associated with little  to none of  this
risk and is considered safe with respect
to o-dichlorobenzene.
  (33)   cis-l,2-Dichloroethylene.    The
United States  Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) establishes drinking
water  standards  and  has  determined
that   cis-l,2-dichloroethylene   is   a
health concern at  certain levels of ex-
posure. This  organic chemical is used
as a solvent and intermediate in chem-
ical production. It generally gets into
water by improper waste disposal. This
chemical has  been  shown to damage
the  liver,  nervous  system, and  cir-
culatory system of laboratory animals
such as rats and mice  when exposed at
high levels over their  lifetimes. Some
humans who were exposed to relatively
large amounts of this chemical also
suffered damage to the  nervous system.
EPA has set the drinking water stand-
ard for cis-l,2-dichloroethylene at 0.07
parts  per  million  (ppm)  to  protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking water that meets  the
EPA standard is associated with little
to none of this risk and is  considered
safe    with    respect   to   cis-1,2-
dichloroethylene.
                                    405

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (34)  trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene.   The
United States  Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) establishes drinking
water  standards  and  has determined
that  trans-1,2-dichloroethylene  is  a
health concern at certain levels of ex-
posure. This organic  chemical  is used
as a solvent and intermediate in chem-
ical production. It generally gets into
water by improper waste disposal. This
chemical  has been shown to  damage
the liver,  nervous system, and  the cir-
culatory system of laboratory animals
such as rats and mice when exposed at
high levels over their lifetimes.  Some
humans who were exposed to relatively
large  amounts of this chemical  also
suffered damage to the nervous  system.
EPA has  set drinking water standard
for trans-1,2-dichloroethylene  at  0.1
parts  per  million (ppm)  to  protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking  water that  meets the
EPA standard is associated with little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe   with   respect   to   trans-1,2-
dichloroethylene.
  (35) 1,2-Dichloropropane. The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency (EPA)  sets   drinking  water
standards and has determined that 1,2-
dichloropropane is a health concern at
certain levels of exposure. This  organic
chemical is used  as a solvent and pes-
ticide. When soil  and climatic condi-
tions are favorable, 1,2-dichloropropane
may get into drinking water by runoff
into surface water or by leaching into
ground water.  It may also get  into
drinking water through improper waste
disposal. This chemical has been shown
to cause  cancer in laboratory animals
such as rats and  mice when the ani-
mals  are  exposed at high levels  over
their  lifetimes. Chemicals that  cause
cancer in  laboratory animals also may
increase the  risk of  cancer in humans
who are  exposed  over long periods of
time.  EPA has set the drinking water
standard  for  1,2-dichloropropane  at
0.005 parts per million (ppm) to reduce
the risk  of  cancer  or other  adverse
health effects which have  been ob-
served in laboratory  animals. Drinking
water that meets the EPA standard is
associated with little to  none  of this
risk and is considered safe with respect
to 1,2-dichloropropane.
  (36) 2,4-D. The United States Envi-
ronmental  Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets  drinking water standards and has
determined that 2,4-D is a health con-
cern at certain levels of exposure. This
organic chemical is used as a herbicide
and  to  control  algae  in  reservoirs.
When soil and  climatic conditions are
favorable, 2,4-D may get into drinking
water by runoff into surface water or
by leaching into  ground water. This
chemical has  been shown to damage
the liver and kidney of  laboratory ani-
mals such as rats exposed at high lev-
els  during their lifetimes.  Some hu-
mans who  were exposed to relatively
large amounts of this  chemical  also
suffered damage to the nervous system.
EPA has set the drinking water stand-
ard for 2,4-D at 0.07 parts per million
(ppm)  to protect  against the risk of
these adverse  health effects. Drinking
water that meets  the EPA standard is
associated  with little to  none  of this
risk  and  is considered safe with respect
to 2,4-D.
  (37)  Epichlorohydrin.   The   United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking  water
standards  and has  determined that
epichlorohydrin is a health  concern at
certain levels  of exposure. Polymers
made from epichlorohydrin are some-
times used in the treatment of water
supplies  as a flocculent  to remove par-
ticulates.  Epichlorohydrin  generally
gets  into drinking water by improper
use  of these polymers.  This chemical
has been shown to cause cancer in lab-
oratory animals such as rats and mice
when the animals are exposed at high
levels  over their  lifetimes. Chemicals
that cause cancer in laboratory  ani-
mals also may increase  the risk of can-
cer in humans who are exposed over
long periods of time. EPA has  set the
drinking    water   standard     for
epichlorohydrin  using   a  treatment
techniqtue to reduce the risk of cancer
or other adverse health effects which
have been  observed in laboratory ani-
mals. This treatment technique limits
the amount of epichlorohydrin in the
polymer  and the amount of the poly-
mer  which may be added to drinking
water as a flocculent to remove partic-
ulates. Drinking  water  systems which
comply with this  treatment technique
                                    406

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141,32
have  little to no risk and are consid-
ered    safe    with    respect     to
epichlorohydrin.
  (38) Ethylbenzene. The United States
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA) sets drinking water  standards
and has determined ethylbenzene is a
health concern at certain levels of ex-
posure. This  organic  chemical  is  a
major component of gasoline. It  gen-
erally gets into  water by improper
waste  disposal   or  leaking  gasoline
tanks. This chemical has  been shown
to damage the kidney, liver, and nerv-
ous system of laboratory animals such
as rats exposed to high levels during
their lifetimes. EPA has set the drink-
ing water standard for ethylbenzene at
0.7 part per million (ppm) to protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking water that meets the
EPA standard is  associated with  little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe with respect to ethylbenzene.
  (39)  Ethylene  dibromide  (EDB).  The
United States Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) sets drinking water
standards  and  has determined  that
EDB is a health concern at certain lev-
els of  exposure. This organic chemical
was once a popular pesticide. When soil
and climatic conditions are favorable,
EDB may  get into drinking water  by
runoff into surface water or by leach-
ing into  ground water. This chemical
has been shown to cause cancer in lab-
oratory animals such as rats and mice
when the  animals are  exposed at high
levels  over their lifetimes. Chemicals
that cause  cancer in  laboratory  ani-
mals also may increase the risk of can-
cer in humans who are exposed  over
long periods of time. EPA has set  the
drinking water  standard for EDB  at
0.00005 part per million (ppm) to reduce
the risk  of cancer  or  other  adverse
health effects  which  have  been  ob-
served in laboratory animals. Drinking
water that meets this standard is asso-
ciated with little  to none  of this  risk
and is considered safe with respect to
EDB.
  (40)  Heptachlor.  The  United States
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA)  sets drinking water standards
and has determined that heptachlor is
a health concern  at certain levels of
exposure.  This organic  chemical  was
once a popular pesticide. When soil and
climatic conditions are favorable, hep-
tachlor may get into drinking water by
runoff into surface water or by leach-
ing into ground water. This  chemical
has been shown to cause cancer in lab-
oratory animals such as rats and mice
when the animals are exposed at high
levels  over their lifetimes. Chemicals
that cause cancer  in laboratory ani-
mals also may increase the risk of can-
cer in humans who are exposed  over
long periods  of time. EPA has set the
drinking  water standards  for hepta-
chlor at 0.0004 part per million (ppm) to
reduce the risk  of cancer or other ad-
verse health effects which have  been
observed in laboratory animals. Drink-
ing water that meets  this standard is
associated with little to none of this
risk and is considered safe with respect
to heptachlor.
  (41)  Heptachlor epoxide.  The United
States    Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking-  wateJ'
standards and has determined that hep-
tachlor epoxide is a health concern at
certain levels of exposure. This organic
chemical was once a popular pesticide.
When soil and climatic conditions are
favorable, heptachlor expoxide may get
into drinking water by runoff into sur-
face water or by leaching  into ground
water.  This chemical  has  been shown
to cause cancer in laboratory animals
such as  rats and mice when the ani-
mals are exposed at high levels  over
their  lifetimes.  Chemicals that cause
cancer in laboratory animals also may
increase the  risk of cancer in humans
who are exposed over long periods of
time.  EPA has set the drinking water
standards for heptachlor  epoxide at
0.0002 part per million (ppm) to reduce
the risk  of  cancer  or other  adverse
health  effects  which  have  been  ob-
served in laboratory animals. Drinking
water that meets this standard is asso-
ciated  with little to none  of  this risk
and is  considered safe with respect to
heptachlor epoxide.
  (42) Lindane. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined that lindane is a health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This organic  chemical  is used as a pes-
ticide.  When soil and climatic condi-
tions  are favorable, lindane  may  get
                                    407
      203-160  D-14

-------
§141.32
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
into drinking water by runoff into sur-
face water or by leaching into ground
water. This chemical has been  shown
to damage the liver, kidney, nervous
system, and immune system  of labora-
tory animals such as rats,  mice and
dogs exposed at high levels during their
lifetimes.  Some humans who were ex-
posed to relatively large amounts  of
this chemical also suffered damage  to
the  nervous system  and  circulatory
system. EPA has established the drink-
ing water standard for lindane at 0.0002
part  per  million  (ppm)  to protect
against the risk of these adverse  health
effects.  Drinking water that  meets the
EPA standard is associated with little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe with respect to lindane.
  (43) Methoxychlor. The United  States
Environmental    Protection   Agency
(EPA) sets  drinking  water  standards
and has determined that methoxychlor
is a health concern at certain levels of
exposure. This organic chemical is  used
as a pesticide. When  soil and climatic
conditions are favorable, methoxychlor
may get into drinking water by runoff
into surface water or by leaching  into
ground  water. This chemical has  been
shown to  damage  the  liver, kidney,
nervous system, and  reproductive sys-
tem of laboratory animals such as rats
exposed at high levels during their life-
times.  It  has  also  been  shown  to
produce growth  retardation in  rats.
EPA has set the drinking water stand-
ard for methoxychlor at 0.04 part per
million (ppm) to  protect against the
risk of these adverse health  effects.
Drinking  water that meets  the  EPA
standard is associated  with little  to
none of this risk and  is considered safe
with respect to methoxychlor.
  (44) Monochlorobenzene. The  United
States   Environmental   Protection
Agency (EPA)  sets  drinking  water
standards   and   has   determined  that
monochlorobenzene is a health concern
at certain levels of exposure. This or-
ganic chemical is used as a solvent. It
generally gets into water by improper
waste disposal.  This chemical has  been
shown to damage the  liver, kidney and
nervous system of laboratory animals
such as rats and mice exposed to  high
levels during their lifetimes. EPA has
set the drinking  water standard for
monochlorobenzene at 0.1 part per mil-
lion  (ppm) to protect against the risk
of these adverse health effects. Drink-
ing water  that meets the EPA standard
is associated with little to none of this
risk  and is considered safe with respect
to monochlorobenzene.
  (45) Poly chlorinated  biphenyls (PCBs).
The  United States Environmental Pro-
tection Agency (EPA)  sets drinking
water  standards  and  has  determined
that polychlorinated  biphenyls (PCBs)
are a health concern at certain levels
of exposure. These organic chemicals
were once widely  used in  electrical
transformers   and  other  industrial
equipment.  They  generally get  into
drinking water by improper waste dis-
posal or leaking electrical industrial
equipment.  This  chemical has  been
shown to  cause cancer  in  laboratory
animals such  as  rats and mice  when
the animals are exposed at high levels
over  their lifetimes.  Chemicals  that
cause  cancer   in  laboratory  animals
also  may increase the risk of cancer in
humans who are exposed over long pe-
riods of time. EPA has set the drinking
water standard for PCBs at 0.0005 part
per million (ppm) to reduce  the risk of
cancer or other adverse health effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals.   Drinking water that  meets
this  standard is associated  with  little
to none of this risk and is  considered
safe  with respect to PCBs.
  (46)  Pentachlorophenol.  The  United
States    Environmental    Protection
Agency (EPA)  sets   drinking  water
standards   and has  determined   that
pentachlorophenol is  a health concern
at certain levels  of exposure. This or-
ganic chemical is  used as a wood pre-
servative,  herbicide,  disinfectant, and
defoliant.  It generally gets into drink-
ing water by runoff into surface water
or leaching into  ground water.  This
chemical  has  been shown to produce
adverse reproductive  effects and  to
damage the liver  and kidneys of lab-
oratory animals such as rats exposed
to high levels  during their lifetimes.
Some humans who were exposed to rel-
atively large amounts of this chemical
also  suffered damage to the liver and
kidneys. This chemical has been shown
to cause cancer in laboratory animals
such as rats and  mice when the ani-
mals are  exposed to high levels  over
their lifetimes. Chemicals that  cause
                                    408

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.32
cancer in laboratory animals also may
increase the risk of cancer in  humans
who are exposed over long- periods of
time. EPA has set the drinking water
standard for pentachJorophenol at 0.001
parts per million (ppm)  to  protect
against the risk of cancer or other ad-
verse health  effects.  Drinking  water
that meets the EPA standard is associ-
ated with little to none of this risk and
is  considered  safe with  respect  to
pentachlorophenol.
  (47) Styrene. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards  and has
determined that styrene  is a health
concern at certain levels  of exposure.
This  organic chemical  is commonly
used to make plastics and is sometimes
a component of resins used for drinking
water treatment. Styrene may  get into
drinking  water from  improper  waste
disposal. This chemical has been shown
to damage the liver and nervous sys-
tem in  laboratory animals when ex-
posed at high levels during their life-
times. EPA has set the drinking water
standard for styrene at 0.1 part per mil-
lion (ppm) to protect against the risk
of these adverse health effects. Drink-
ing water that meets the EPA standard
is associated with little to none of this
risk and is considered safe with respect
to styrene.
  (48) Tetrachloroethylene.  The   United
States    Environmental    Protection
Agency   (EPA)  sets   drinking  water
standards  and  has determined  that
tetrachloroethylene is a health  concern
at certain levels of exposure. This or-
ganic chemical has been a popular sol-
vent, particularly for  dry cleaning. It
generally gets into drinking water by
improper waste disposal. This chemical
has been shown to cause cancer in lab-
oratory animals such as rats and mice
when the  animals are  exposed  at high
levels over their lifetimes. Chemicals
that cause  cancer in  laboratory ani-
mals also  may increase the risk of can-
cer in humans who are  exposed  over
long periods of time.  EPA has  set the
drinking    water    standard    for
tetrachloroethylene at 0.005 part per
million (ppm) to reduce the risk of can-
cer  or  other  adverse  health   effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals.  Drinking water  that meets
this standard is associated with little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe      with       respect       to
tetrachloroethylene.
  (49) Toluene. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined  that  toluene is a  health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This organic chemical is used as a sol-
vent and  in the manufacture of gaso-
line for airplanes. It generally gets into
water  by  improper waste  disposal  or
leaking underground  storage  tanks.
This chemical has been shown to dam-
age  the kidney, nervous system, and
circulatory  system of laboratory ani-
mals such as rats and mice exposed  to
high  levels  during  their  lifetimes.
Some industrial workers who were ex-
posed  to  relatively large  amounts  of
this chemical during working careers
also suffered damage to the liver, kid-
ney  and nervous system. EPA has set
the  drinking water standard for tol-
uene at 1 part per million (ppm) to pro-
tect against the risk of adverse health
effects. Drinking water  that meets the
EPA standard is associated with little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe with respect to toluene.
  (50)  Toxaphene.  The  United  States
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA)  sets  drinking water  standards
and has determined that toxaphene is a
health concern at  certain levels of ex-
posure. This organic chemical was once
a pesticide widely used on cotton, corn,
soybeans,  pineapples and other crops.
When soil and climatic conditions are
favorable,   toxaphene  may  get into
drinking water by  runoff into surface
water  or  by  leaching into  ground
water.  This chemical has  been  shown
to cause cancer in  laboratory animals
such as rats and mice  when the ani-
mals are  exposed  at high  levels over
their lifetimes. Chemicals that  cause
cancer in  laboratory animals also may
increase the risk of cancer in humans
who are exposed  over long periods  of
time. EPA has set  the drinking water
standard for toxaphene at 0.003 part pel-
million (ppm) to reduce the risk of can-
cer  or  other  adverse  health effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals.  Drinking  water  that  meets
this standard is associated with little
to none of this risk and is considered
safe with respect to toxaphene.
                                    409

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (51) 2,4,5-TP. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets  drinking water standards and has
determined  that 2,4,5-TP  is a  health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This organic chemical is used as a her-
bicide. When soil  and climatic condi-
tions are  favorable, 2,4,5-TP may get
into  drinking water by runoff into sur-
face  water or  by leaching  into ground
water.  This chemical has  been shown
to damage the liver and kidney of lab-
oratory animals such as rats and dogs
exposed to high levels during their life-
times.  Some  industrial workers who
were   exposed  to   relatively   large
amounts of this chemical during work-
ing careers also  suffered damage to the
nervous system. EPA has set the drink-
ing water standard for 2,4,5-TP at 0.05
part   per  million  (ppm)  to  protect
against the risk of these  adverse health
effects. Drinking water that meets the
EPA standard is associated with little
to none of this  risk and is considered
safe with respect to 2,4,5-TP.
  (52) Xylenes.  The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets  drinking water standards and has
determined that xylene is a health con-
cern  at certain levels of  exposure. This
organic chemical is used in the manu-
facture of gasoline for airplanes and as
a solvent for pesticides, and as a clean-
er and degreaser of metals. It  usually
gets  into water by improper waste dis-
posal. This chemical has been shown to
damage the liver,  kidney and nervous
system of laboratory animals such  as
rats  and  dogs  exposed to  high levels
during their lifetimes.  Some humans
who  were exposed  to relatively large
amounts of this chemical also suffered
damage to  the  nervous system. EPA
has set the drinking water  standard for
xylene at  10 parts per million (ppm) to
protect against the risk of these  ad-
verse  health  effects.  Drinking  water
that meets the EPA standard is associ-
ated with little to none of this risk and
is considered safe with  respect to xy-
lene.
  (53) Antimony.  The United States En-
vironmental Protection  Agency (EPA)
sets  drinking water standards and has
determined  that antimony  is a health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This inorganic  chemical occurs natu-
rally in soils, ground water and surface
waters and is often  used in the flame
retardant industry.  It is also  used in
ceramics, glass,  batteries,  fireworks
and explosives. It may get into drink-
ing water through natural weathering
of rock,  industrial production, munic-
ipal  waste disposal  or  manufacturing
processes.  This  chemical  has  been
shown to decrease longevity,  and al-
tered blood levels  of cholesterol  and
glucose in laboratory animals  such as
rats exposed to high  levels during their
lifetimes. EPA has  set the drinking
water  standard for  antimony  at 0.006
parts  per million  (ppm) to  protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking water which meets
the EPA standard is  associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered safe with respect to anti-
mony.
  (54) Beryllium. The  United States  En-
vironmental Protection Agency (EPA)
sets  drinking water  standards  and  has
determined that  beryllium is a health
concern  at certain levels of exposure.
This inorganic metal occurs naturally
in soils,  ground water and surface  wa-
ters  and is  often  used  in  electrical
equipment and electrical components.
It generally gets  into water from run-
off from mining  operations,  discharge
from  processing  plants  and improper
waste  disposal. Beryllium compounds
have  been associated with damage to
the bones and lungs and induction of
cancer in laboratory animals  such as
rats and mice when the animals are ex-
posed  at high levels  over  their  life-
times. There is limited evidence to sug-
gest  that beryllium  may pose a cancer
risk   via drinking   water  exposure.
Therefore, EPA  based the  health as-
sessment on noncancer effects  with an
extra uncertainty factor to account for
possible   carcinogenicity.  Chemicals
that  cause cancer in laboratory  ani-
mals also may increase the risk of can-
cer in humans who are exposed  over
long periods of time. EPA has set  the
drinking water standard for  beryllium
at 0.004 part per  million (ppm) to pro-
tect  against the  risk of these  adverse
health effects. Drinking  water which
meets the EPA standard is associated
with  little to  none  of  this risk  and
should be considered safe with respect
to beryllium.
                                    410

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.32
  (55) Cyanide. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards  and has
determined that cyanide is a health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This inorganic chemical is used in elec-
troplating, steel  processing,  plastics,
synthetic  fabrics  and  fertilizer prod-
ucts. It usually gets into water as a re-
sult of improper waste disposal.  This
chemical  has been  shown  to  damage
the spleen, brain and liver  of  humans
fatally poisoned with cyanide. EPA has
set the drinking water standard for cy-
anide at 0.2 parts per million (ppm) to
protect against the  risk of these ad-
verse  health effects. Drinking water
which  meets  the EPA standard is asso-
ciated with little  to none of this risk
and should be considered safe with re-
spect to cyanide.
  (56) [Reserved]
  (57) Thallium. The  United  States En-
vironmental  Protection Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards  and has
determined that thallium is a health
concern at certain high levels of expo-
sure.  This inorganic metal is found
naturally in  soils  and is  used  in  elec-
tronics, Pharmaceuticals,  and the man-
ufacture  of  glass  and  alloys.  This
chemical  has been  shown  to  damage
the kidney, liver,  brain and intestines
of laboratory animals  when the ani-
mals are  exposed  at high  levels  over
their lifetimes. EPA has set the drink-
ing water standard for thallium at 0.002
parts  per million  (ppm)  to  protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking  water  which meets
the EPA  standard is associated  with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered safe  with respect  to thal-
lium.
  (58)  Bemo[a]pyrene.   The   United
States    Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets drinking water
standards  and  has  determined  that
benzo[a]pyrene  is  a  health  concern at
certain levels  of  exposure. Cigarette
smoke and charbroiled meats are com-
mon source  of general exposure. The
major  source  of  benzo[a]pyrene  in
drinking  water  is  the  leaching from
coal tar  lining and  sealants in water
storage tanks. This chemical has  been
shown  to  cause cancer in  animals  such
as rats and mice when the animals are
exposed at high levels. EPA  has set the
drinking    water    standard    for
benzo[a]pyrene at 0.0002 parts per mil-
lion (ppm) to  protect against the risk
of cancer. Drinking water which meets
the EPA  standard is  associated  with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered  safe   with  respect   to
benzo[a]pyrene.
  (59) Dalapon. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards  and has
determined that  dalapon is a health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
This organic chemical is a widely used
herbicide.  It  may get into drinking
water  after  application  to  control
grasses in crops,  drainage ditches and
along railroads. This chemical has been
shown to  cause damage to the kidney
and liver  in laboratory animals when
the animals are exposed to high levels
over their lifetimes. EPA has  set the
drinking water standard for dalapon at
0.2 parts per million (ppm)  to  protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking  water which meets
the EPA  standard is  associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered  safe    with  respect   to
dalapon.
  (60)  Dichloromethane.  The  United
States    Environmental    Protection
Agency (EPA)  sets  drinking water
standards   and has determined  that
dichloromethane  (methylene chloride)
is a health concern at certain levels of
exposure.  This organic chemical  is a
widely used solvent. It is used in the
manufacture of paint remover,  as a
metal degreaser and as an aerosol pro-
pellant. It generally gets into drinking
water  after  improper  discharge  of
waste disposal. This chemical has been
shown to  cause cancer in  laboratory
animals such  as  rats  and mice  when
the animals are exposed at high levels
over  their lifetimes.  Chemicals  that
cause  cancer  in  laboratory animals
also may increase  the risk of cancer in
humans who are exposed over long pe-
riods of time. EPA has set the drinking
water standard for dichloromethane  at
0.005 parts per million (ppm) to reduce
the risk  of cancer or other  adverse
health effects  which  have  been ob-
served in laboratory animals. Drinking
water which meets this standard is as-
sociated with little to none of this risk
                                    411

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
and should be considered safe with re-
spect to dichloromethane.
  (61)  Di   (Z-ethylhexyl)adipate.  The
United States  Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) sets drinking water
standards  and  has  determined  that
di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate is a health con-
cern at certain levels of exposure. Di(2-
ethylhexyl)adipate is a  widely  used
plasticizer in a variety of products, in-
cluding  synthetic rubber, food pack-
aging materials and cosmetics. It may
get into drinking water after improper
waste disposal. This chemical has been
shown to damage liver  and testes  in
laboratory animals  such as rats and
mice exposed to high levels. EPA has
set the drinking  water  standard  for
di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate at 0.4 parts per
million  (ppm)  to  protect against the
risk of adverse  health effects. Drinking
water which meets the  EPA standards
is associated with little to none of this
risk and should be considered safe with
respect to di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate.
  (62)  Dl(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate.   The
United States  Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) sets drinking water
standards  and  has  determined  that
di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate is a  health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate is a  widely
used  plasticizer,  which  is  primarily
used in  the production  of polyvinyl
chloride (PVC) resins. It may get into
drinking water after improper waste
disposal. This chemical has been shown
to cause cancer in laboratory animals
such as rats and mice exposed to high
levels over their lifetimes. EPA has set
the drinking water  standard for  di(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate at 0.006 parts per
million (ppm) to reduce the risk of can-
cer  or  other  adverse  health  effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals. Drinking water which meets
the EPA  standard is associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered safe with respect to  di(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate.
  (63) Dinoseb. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined  that  dinoseb is a  health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
Dinoseb is a widely  used  pesticide and
generally gets  into drinking  water
after application on orchards,  vine-
yards and  other crops. This chemical
has been shown to damage the thyroid
and reproductive organs in laboratory
animals such  as  rats exposed  to  high
levels. EPA has set the drinking water
standard for dinoseb at 0.007 parts per
million (ppm)  to protect  against the
risk of adverse health effects. Drinking
water which meets the EPA standard is
associated  with little  to none  of this
risk and should be considered safe with
respect to dinoseb.
  (64)  Diquat. The United States Envi-
ronmental  Protection  Agency (EPA)
sets drinking  water standards  and has
determined that diquat is a health con-
cern at certain levels of exposure. This
organic chemical is a herbicide used to
control terrestrial  and aquatic weeds.
It may get into drinking water by run-
off  into surface  water. This chemical
has been shown  to damage the liver,
kidney and gastrointestinal tract and
causes cataract  formation in  labora-
tory animals such as dogs  and rats ex-
posed at high levels  over their  life-
times. EPA has set the drinking- water
standard for  diquat at 0.02 parts per
million (ppm)  to protect  against the
risk of these  adverse  health effects.
Drinking water which meets  the  EPA
standard is associated with  little to
none of this risk and should be  consid-
ered safe with respect to diquat.
  (65)  Endothall. The United States En-
vironmental Protection Agency (EPA)
has determined  that  endothatl  is  a
health concern at certain levels of ex-
posure. This organic chemical is a her-
bicide used to control  terrestrial  and
aquatic weeds. It may  get into water
by  runoff  into  surface  water.  This
chemical has  been shown  to  damage
the   liver,  kidney,   gastrointestinal
tract  and reproductive system  of lab-
oratory animals such as rats and  mice
exposed at high  levels over their life-
times. EPA has set the drinking water-
standard for endothall at 0.1 parts per
million (ppm)  to protect  against the
risk of these  adverse  health effects.
Drinking water which meets  the  EPA
standard is associated with  little to
none  of this risk and should be  consid-
ered safe with respect to endothall.
  (66)  Endrin. The United States Envi-
ronmental  Protection  Agency (EPA)
sets drinking  water standards  and has
determined that endrin is a health con-
cern at certain levels of exposure. This
                                     412

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.32
organic  chemical  is  a pesticide  no
longer registered for use in the United
States. However, this chemical is per-
sistent in  treated  soils and  accumu-
lates in sediments and aquatic and ter-
restrial biota. This chemical has been
shown to cause damage to the  liver,
kidney and heart in laboratory animals
such as  rats and mice when  the ani-
mals  are exposed at high levels over
their lifetimes. EPA has set the drink-
ing water standard for endrin at 0.002
parts  per  million  (ppm)  to protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects  which have  been  observed in
laboratory   animals.  Drinking  water
that meets the EPA standard is associ-
ated with little to none of this risk and
should be considered safe with respect
to endrin.
  (67)  Glyphosate.  The  United States
Environmental   Protection  Agency
(EPA)  sets  drinking water standards
and has determined that glyphosate is
a health concern at certain levels of
exposure. This organic chemical is a
herbicide used to control  grasses and
weeds. It may get into drinking water
by  runoff  into  surface  water.  This
chemical has been shown to cause dam-
age to the liver and kidneys in labora-
tory animals such as  rats and  mice
when the animals are  exposed at high
levels over their lifetimes. EPA has set
the  drinking   water   standard   for
glyphosate   at  0.7  parts per million
(ppm)  to protect against  the risk of
these adverse health effects. Drinking
water which meets the EPA standard is
associated with little  to none of this
risk and should be considered safe with
respect to glyphosate.
  (68)  Hexachlorobenzene.  The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking  water
standards and has determined  that
hexachlorobenzene is a health concern
at certain levels  of exposure.  This or-
ganic chemical is produced as an impu-
rity in the manufacture of certain sol-
vents and pesticides. This chemical has
been shown  to  cause cancer in labora-
tory animals such as  rats and  mice
when the animals are  exposed to high
levels during their lifetimes. Chemicals
that cause  cancer  in  laboratory  ani-
mals also may increase  the risk of can-
cer in humans who are exposed over
long periods  of time. EPA has set the
drinking    water     standard     for
hexachlorobenzene  at  0.001 parts  per
million (ppm) to protect against  the
risk of cancer and other adverse health
effects. Drinking water which  meets
the EPA  standard  is  associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered  safe   with  respect  to
hexachlorobenzene.
  (69)   Hexachlorocyclopentadiene.   The
United States Environmental Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) establishes drinking
water  standards  and  has  determined
that hexachlorocyclopentadiene  is a
health  concern at certain levels of ex-
posure. This organic chemical is used
as an intermediate in the manufacture
of pesticides and flame retardants. It
may get  into water by discharge from
production  facilities.  This  chemical
has been shown to damage the kidney
and the stomach of laboratory animals
when exposed at high levels over their
lifetimes. EPA has set the drinking
water          standard           for
hexachlorocyclopentadiene    at    0.05
parts   per  million  (ppm)  to protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking water which  meets
the EPA  standard  is  associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered  safe   with  respect  to
hexachlorocyclopentadiene.
  (70) Oxamyl, The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
establishes  drinking  water standards
and has  determined that oxamyl is a
health  concern at certain levels of ex-
posure. This organic chemical is used
as a pesticide for the control of insects
and other pests. It may get into drink-
ing water by runoff into surface water
or leaching into ground water.  This
chemical  has  been shown  to damage
the kidneys of laboratory animals such
as rats when exposed  at  high  levels
over their lifetimes. EPA has set  the
drinking water standard for oxamyl at
0.2 parts per million (ppm) to protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects. Drinking water which  meets
the EPA  standard  is  associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered safe with respect to oxamyl.
  (71) Picloram. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency  (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined  that picloram  is a health
concern at certain  levels of exposure.
                                    413

-------
§141.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
This organic chemical is used as a pes-
ticide  for  broadleaf  weed control.  It
may get into drinking water by runoff
into surface water or  leaching  into
ground water as a result  of  pesticide
application and  improper waste dis-
posal. This chemical has been shown to
cause damage to the kidneys  and liver
in  laboratory  animals  such as  rats
when the animals are exposed at high
levels over their lifetimes. EPA has set
the  drinking   water   standard   for
picloram at 0.5 parts per million (ppm)
to protect against the risk of these ad-
verse health effects.  Drinking water
which meets the EPA standard is asso-
ciated with little to  none  of this risk
and should be considered safe with re-
spect to picloram.
  (72) Simazine. The United States En-
vironmental Protection  Agency (EPA)
sets drinking water standards and has
determined that simazine  is  a health
concern at  certain levels of exposure.
This organic chemical is  a herbicide
used  to control  annual grasses and
broadleaf weeds.  It  may  leach  into
ground water or runs off into surface
water after application.  This  chemical
may cause  cancer in laboratory ani-
mals such as rats and mice exposed at
high  levels during   their  lifetimes.
Chemicals that cause cancer in labora-
tory animals also may increase  the
risk of cancer  in  humans who are ex-
posed over long periods of time. EPA
has set the drinking water standard for
simazine  at 0.004 parts per  million
(ppm)  to reduce the risk of  cancer or
other adverse health effects. Drinking
water which meets the EPA standard is
associated  with little to none of this
risk and should be considered safe with
respect to simazine.
  (73) 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene. The United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets   drinking  water
standards  and  has  determined  that
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene is a  health  con-
cern at certain levels of exposure. This
organic chemical is used as a dye car-
rier and as a  precursor in herbicide
manufacture.  It  generally  gets  into
drinking water by discharges from in-
dustrial  activities. This chemical has
been shown to cause damage  to several
organs, including the adrenal glands.
EPA has set the drinking water stand-
ard  for  1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 0.07
parts per  million (ppm)  to  protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects.  Drinking  water which meets
the EPA  standard is  associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered safe with respect to 1,2,4-
trichlorobenzene .
  (74) 1,1,2-Trichloroethane.  The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets   drinking  water
standards and has determined 1,1,2-tri-
chloroethane is a health  concern  at
certain levels of exposure. This organic
chemical is an intermediate in the pro-
duction of 1,1-dichloroethylene.  It gen-
erally gets into water by industrial dis-
charge of wastes.  This  chemical has
been shown  to  damage the kidney and
liver of laboratory animals such as rats
exposed to high levels during their life-
times. EPA  has set the drinking water
standard  for  1,1,2-trichloroethane  at
0.005 parts per million (ppm) to protect
against the risk of these adverse health
effects.  Drinking  water which meets
the EPA  standard is  associated with
little to none of this risk and should be
considered safe with respect to 1,1,2-tri-
chloroethane.
  (75) 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin). The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets   drinking  water
standards and  has determined  that
dioxin  is  a  health concern at certain
levels of exposure. This organic chem-
ical is an impurity in the production of
some pesticides. It may get into drink-
ing water by  industrial  discharge  of
wastes. This chemical has been shown
to cause cancer in laboratory animals
such as rats and  mice when the ani-
mals are  exposed at  high levels  over
their lifetimes. Chemicals that cause
cancer in laboratory animals also may
increase the risk of cancer in humans
who  are  exposed over long periods of
time. EPA has set the drinking water
standard for dioxin at 0.00000003 parts
per million (ppm)  to reduce the  risk of
cancer or other adverse health  effects
which have been observed in laboratory
animals. Drinking water which meets
this  standard  is associated with little
to none of this risk and should be con-
sidered safe with respect to dioxin.
  (76) Chlorine. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency  (EPA)
sets  drinking water standards and has
determined  that chlorine  is a  health
                                     414

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.32
concern at certain  levels of exposure.
Chlorine is added to drinking water as
a  disinfectant  to  kill  bacteria and
other  disease-causing  microorganisms
and is also added to provide continuous
disinfection throughout  the  distribu-
tion system. Disinfection  is required
for surface  water systems. However, at
high doses for extended periods of time,
chlorine has been shown to affect blood
and  the liver in laboratory  animals.
EPA has set a drinking water standard
for chlorine to protect against the risk
of  these   adverse   effects.   Drinking
water  which meets  this EPA standard
is associated with little to none  of this
risk and should be considered  safe with
respect to chlorine.
  (77)  Chlorammes. The United  States
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA) sets drinking water  standards
and  has determined that chloramines
are a health concern at certain levels
of exposure. Chloramines are  added to
drinking water as a disinfectant  to kill
bacteria  and  other  disease-causing
microorganisms and are also  added to
provide     continuous    disinfection
throughout  the distribution system.
Disinfection  is  required  for surface
water  systems. However,  at high doses
for   extended   periods   of   time,
chloramines have been shown to affect
blood and  the liver in laboratory ani-
mals.  EPA has  set  a drinking  water
standard  for chloramines  to protect
against the risk of these  adverse ef-
fects. Drinking water which meets this
EPA standard is associated with little
to none of this risk and should be con-
sidered   safe   with   respect    to
chloramines.
  (78)  Chlorine   dioxide.  The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)   sets  drinking  water
standards  and  has  determined that
chlorine dioxide is a health concern at
certain levels of exposure. Chlorine di-
oxide is used in water treatment  to kill
bacteria  and  other  disease-causing
microorganisms  and  can  be  used  to
control tastes and odors.  Disinfection
is required  for surface water  systems.
However, at high doses, chlorine diox-
ide-treated  drinking  water  has been
shown to  affect blood in laboratory
animals. Also, high  levels  of chlorine
dioxide given to  laboratory animals in
drinking water  have  been  shown  to
cause neurological effects on the devel-
oping    nervous    system.    These
neurodevelopmental effects  may occur
as a result of a  short-term excessive
chlorine dioxide exposure. To  protect
against such potentially harmful expo-
sures,  EPA requires  chlorine  dioxide
monitoring at  the  treatment  plant,
where  disinfection occurs, and at rep-
resentative points in the distribution
system serving water users. EPA has
set a drinking water standard for chlo-
rine dioxide to protect against the risk
of these adverse effects.

  NOTE: In addition to the language in this
introductory text of paragraph (e)(78), sys-
tems must  include  either the  language m
paragraph (e)(78)(i) or (e)(78)(ii) of Uiis sec-
tion. Systems with a violation at the treat-
ment plant, but not in the distribution sys-
tem, are  required to use the  language  in
paragraph (e)(78)(i) of this section and treat
the violation as a nonacute violation. Sys-
tems with a violation in the distribution sys-
tem are required to use the language in para-
graph (e)(78)(ii)  of this section and treat the
violation as an acute violation.

  (i) The chlorine dioxide violations re-
ported   today   are   the   result   of
exceedances at  the treatment facility
only, and do not  include  violations
within the distribution system  serving
users of this  water supply.  Continued
compliance with chlorine dioxide levels
within the distribution  system mini-
mizes the potential risk of these viola-
tions to present consumers.
  (ii) The  chlorine dioxide  violations
reported today include exceedances  of
the EPA standard  within the distribu-
tion system serving water users. Viola-
tions of  the chlorine  dioxide standard
within  the distribution  system may
harm human  health  based  on  short-
term exposures. Certain groups, includ-
ing  pregnant  women,   infants,  and
young  children, may be especially sus-
ceptible to adverse effects of excessive
exposure  to  chlorine  dioxide-treated
water.  The purpose of this notice is  to
advise  that such persons should con-
sider reducing their risk  of adverse ef-
fects from  these chlorine  dioxide viola-
tions by seeking  alternate  sources  of
water  for  human  consumption  until
such exceedances are rectified. Local
and  State  health  authorities are the
best  sources  for  information  con-
cerning alternate drinking water.
                                     415

-------
§141.33
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (79) Disinfection byproducts and treat-
ment  technique for  DBFs.  The  United
States   Environmental    Protection
Agency  (EPA)  sets  drinking   water
standards and requires the disinfection
of drinking water. However, when used
in the  treatment  of  drinking  water,
disinfectants react with naturally-oc-
curring organic and inorganic  matter
present in water  to  form  chemicals
called disinfection  byproducts (DBFs).
EPA has determined that a number of
DBPs are a health concern at  certain
levels  of exposure. Certain DBPs, in-
cluding some  trihalomethanes (THMs)
and some haloacetic acids (HAAs), have
been shown to cause cancer in  labora-
tory animals. Other  DBPs have been
shown to affect the liver and the nerv-
ous system, and cause reproductive or
developmental effects in  laboratory
animals.  Exposure  to certain  DBPs
may produce similar effects in  people.
EPA has set standards to limit expo-
sure to THMs, HAAs, and other DBPs.
  (80) Bromate. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency   (EPA)
sets  drinking  water standards and has
determined that  bromate  is  a  health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
Bromate is formed as a byproduct of
ozone  disinfection  of  drinking  water.
Ozone reacts with naturally occurring-
bromide in the water to form bromate.
Bromate has  been shown  to produce
cancer in rats. EPA has set a drinking
water  standard to limit exposure to
bromate.
  (81) Chlorite. The United States Envi-
ronmental Protection  Agency   (EPA)
sets  drinking  water standards and has
determined that  chlorite  is  a  health
concern at certain levels of exposure.
Chlorite is formed from the breakdown
of chlorine dioxide, a drinking water
disinfectant.   Chlorite  in  drinking
water  has  been shown to  affect blood
and  the  developing  nervous  system.
EPA has set a drinking water standard
for chlorite to protect against these ef-
fects. Drinking water which meets this
standard  is associated with  little to
none of these risks and should  be con-
sidered safe with respect to chlorite.
  (f) Public notices for fluoride. Notice of
violations  of  the maximum  contami-
nant  level for  fluoride,  notices of
variances  and exemptions  from  the
maximum  contaminant level for fluo-
ride, and notices of failure to comply
with variance and exemption schedules
for the maximum contaminant level
for fluoride shall consist of the public
notice prescribed in §143.5(b), plus a de-
scription of any steps which the system
is taking to come into compliance.
  (g) Public notification by the State. The
State may  give notice to the public re-
quired by this section on behalf of the
owner or operator of the public  water
system  if the State complies with the
requirements of this section. However,
the owner  or  operator  of the public
water system remains legally respon-
sible  for  ensuring that the  require-
ments of this section are met.
[52 FR 41546, Oct. 28, 1987, as amended at 54
FR 15188, Apr.  17,  1989; 54  FR 27527, 27566,
June 29, 1989; 55 FR 25064, June 19, 1990; 56 FR
3587, Jan. 30, 1991; 56 FR 26548, June 7, 1991; 56
FR 30279, July 1, 1991; 57 FR 31843, July 17,
1992; 59 FR 34323, July 1, 1994; 60 FR 33932,
June 29, 1995; 63 FR 69464, 69515, Dec. 16, 1998;
65 FR 26022, May 4, 2000]

§ 141.33  Record maintenance.
  Any owner  or operator of a public
water system subject to  the provisions
of this part shall retain on its premises
or  at a convenient location near its
premises the following records:
  (a)  Records of bacteriological anal-
yses made  pursuant to this  part shall
be  kept for  not less  than  5 years.
Records  of  chemical analyses  made
pursuant to this part shall be  kept for
not less than 10 years. Actual labora-
tory reports may be kept, or data may
be  transferred to tabular summaries,
provided that  the following informa-
tion is included:
  (1) The date, place, and time of sam-
pling, and the name of the person who
collected the sample;
  (2) Identification of the sample as to
whether it was a routine distribution
system  sample, check sample, raw or
process  water sample or other special
purpose sample;
  (3) Date of analysis;
  (4) Laboratory and person responsible
for performing analysis;
  (5) The analytical  technique/method
used; and
  (6) The results of the analysis.
  (b)  Records of action  taken by the
system to correct violations of primary
drinking water  regulations  shall  be
kept for a  period not less than 3 years
                                     416

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                            §141.35
after the last action taken with respect
to the particular violation involved.
  (c)  Copies  of any  written reports,
summaries or communications relating'
to sanitary surveys of the system con-
ducted by the system itself, by a pri-
vate consultant, or by any local, State
or Federal agency, shall be  kept for a
period not less than 10 years after com-
pletion of the sanitary survey involved.
  (d) Records concerning a variance or
exemption granted to the system shall
be  kept for  a  period ending  not less
than 5 years following the expiration of
such variance or exemption.
  (e)  Copies  of public  notices  issued
pursuant to Subpart Q of this part and
certifications made  to  the  primacy
agency  pursuant  to  §141.31 must  be
kept for three years after issuance.

[40 FR 59570. Dec. 24.  1975, as amended at 65
FR 26022, May 4, 2000]

§ 141.34  [Reserved]

§ 141.35  Reporting of unregulated con-
    taminant monitoring results.
  (a) Does  this reporting apply to me? (1)
This  section applies to any owner  or
operator of a public water  system re-
quired to monitor for unregulated con-
taminants  under §141.40.  This  section
requires you to report  the  results  of
this monitoring.
  (2) Exception.  You do not need to re-
port results if you are a system serving
a population of 10,000 or less, since EPA
will arrange  for testing and reporting
of the results. However,  you will still
need  to comply  with  consumer  con-
fidence reporting  and public notifica-
tion requirements for these results.
  (b) To whom must I report? You must
report the  results of unregulated  con-
taminant monitoring' to EPA and pro-
vide a copy to the State. You must also
notify the public of the monitoring re-
             sults as provided in Subpart O  (Con-
             sumer Confidence Reports) and Subpart
             Q (Public Notification) of this part.
               (c)  When must I report  monitoring re-
             sults? You  must  report  the results of
             unregulated  contaminant  monitoring
             within  thirty (30)  days  following  the
             month  in  which  you received  the re-
             sults from the  laboratory. EPA will
             conduct its quality control review of
             the data for  sixty  (60)  days after you
             report the  data, which will also  allow
             for quality control review  by systems
             and  States. After the quality  control
             review, EPA will place the  data in  the
             national  drinking water contaminant
             occurrence database at the  time of the
             next  database update.  Exception: Re-
             porting to  EPA of monitoring results
             received by public water  systems prior
             to May 13,  2002. must occur by August
             9, 2002.
               (d)  What information must I report? (1)
             You must provide the following "point
             of contact" information: name, mailing
             address, phone number, and e-mail  ad-
             dress for:
               (i) PWS  Technical Contact,  the per-
             son at your PWS that is responsible for
             the technical aspects of  your unregu-
             lated contaminant  monitoring  regula-
             tion (UCMR) activities, such as details
             concerning sampling and reporting;
               (ii) PWS Official, the person at your
             PWS that is able to function as the of-
             ficial spokesperson for your UCMR ac-
             tivities; and
               (iii) Laboratory Contact Person, the
             person at your  laboratory that is able
             to address questions  concerning the
             analysis that they provided  for you.
               (2) You must update this information
             if it changes  during  the course  of
             UCMR implementation.
               (3) You must  report the information
             specified for data elements 1 through 16
             in the following table for each sample.
        TABLE 1—UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
         Data Element
                                                   Definition
1  Public Water System (PWS) Identifica-
 tion Number

2  Public Water System Facility Identifica-
 tion Number—Sampling Point Identifica-
 tion Number and Sampling Point Type
 Identification
The code used to identify each PWS The code begins with the standard two-char-
 acter postal State abbreviation, the remaining seven characters are unique to
 each PWS
The Sampling point identification number and sampling point type identification
 must either be static or traceable to previous numbers and type identifications
 throughout the period of unregulated  contaminant monitoring. The Sampling
 point identification number is a three-part alphanumeric designation, made up of
                                      417

-------
§141.35
                                 40 CFR Ch.  I (7-1-04 Edition)
    TABLE 1—UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING  REPORTING REQUIREMENTS—Continued
             Data Element
                                                                         Definition
3  Sample Collection Date

4  Sample Identification Number


5  Contaminant/Parameter   .

6  Analytical Results—Sign  .




7  Analytical Result—Value  .


8  Analytical Result—Unit of Measure

9  Analytical Method Number
10 Sample Analysis Type
11  Sample Batch Identification Number
 12  Minimum Reporting Level
13   Minimum  Reporting  Level  Unit  of
  Measure

14  Analytical Precision
a The Public Water System Facility Identification Number is an identification num-
  ber established by the State, or at the State's discretion the PWS, that is unique
  to the PWS for an intake for each source of water, a treatment plant, a distribu-
  tion system, or any other facility associated with water treatment or delivery and
  provides for the relationship of facilities to each  other to be maintained,
b The Sampling Point Identification Number is an identification  number established
  by the State, or at the State's discretion the PWS, that is unique to each PWS
  facility that identifies the specific  sampling point and allows the relationship of
  the sampling point to other facilities to be maintained, and
c Sampling Point Type Identification is one of following
SR—Untreated water collected at the source of the water system facility
EP—Entry point to the distribution system
MD—midpoint in the distribution system where the disinfectant residual would  be
  expected to be typical for the system  such as the location for sampling cotiform
  indicator bacteria as described in 40 CFR 141 21
MR—point of maximum retention is the point located the furthest from the entry
  point to the distribution system which is approved by the State for trihalomethane
  (THM) (disinfectant byproducts (DBP)) and/or total cohform sampling
LD—location in the distribution system where the  disinfectant residual is the lowest
  which is approved by the State for THM (DBP) and/or total coliform sampling
The date the sample is collected reported as 4-digit year,  2-digit month, and 2-digit
  day
An  alphanumeric  value of  up  to 15 characters assigned by the laboratory to
  uniquely identify  containers  or  groups of containers containing  water samples
  collected at the same time and sampling  point
The unregulated contaminant or water quality parameter for which the sample is
  bemg analyzed
An alphanumeric value indicating whether the sample analysis result was
a (<) "less than" means the contaminant  was not detected or was detected at a
  level "less than" the MRL
b (=) "equal to" means the contaminant was  detected at a   level "equal to" the
  value reported in "Analytical Result—Value "
The actual numeric value of the analysis for chemical and  microbiological results,
  or the minimum reporting level (MRL)  if the analytical result is less than the con-
  taminant's MRL
The unit of measurement for the  analytical  results reported [e g ,  micrograms per
  liter, (ug/L), colony-forming units per 100 milliliters, (CFU/100 mL), etc ]
The identification number of the analytical method used
The type of sample collected  Permitted values include
a RFS—Raw field sample—untreated sample collected and submitted tor analysis
  under this rule
b RDS—Raw duplicate field sample—untreated field sample duplicate collected at
  the same time and place as  the raw field sample and  submitted  for analysis
  under this ruEe
c TFS—Treated field sample—treated sample collected and submitted for analysis
  under this rule
d TDS—Treated duplicate field sample—treated field sample duplicate collected at
  the same time and place as the treated  field sample and submitted for analysis
  under this rule
The sample batch identification number consists of three parts
a Up to a 10-character laboratory identification code assigned by EPA
b Up to a 15-character code assigned by the laboratory to uniquely identify each
  extraction or analysis batch
c The date that the samples contained  in each extraction batch extracted or in an
  analysis batch were analyzed, reported as an  8-digit number in the form  4-digit
  year, 2-digit month, and 2-digit day
Minimum Reporting Level (MRL)  refers to the  lowest concentration of an analyte
  that may be reported Unregulated contaminant monitoring (UCM) MRLs are es-
  tablished in §141 40 monitoring requirements for unregulated contaminants
The  unit of measure to express the concentration,  count, or other value oi a con-
  taminant level for the  Minimum  Reporting Level reported  (e g ,  u,g/L, colony
  forming  units/100 mL (CFU/100 mL), etc)
Precision is the degree of agreement between two  repeated measurements  and is
  monitored through the use of duplicate spiked samples For  purposes of the Un-
  regulated  Contaminant Monitoring Regulation  (UCMR),  Analytical  Precision is
  defined  as the relative percent difference (RPD) between   spiked matrix dupli-
  cates The RPD  for the spiked matrix duplicates analyzed in the same batch of
  samples as the analytical result being reported is to be entered in this field Pre-
  cision is calculated as Relative Percent Difference (RPD) of  spiked matrix dupli-
  cates from the mean using
RPD = absolute value of [(X,—X2) /(X, +X2)/2 ] x 100%
where
                                                       418

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                            §141.40
   TABLE 1—UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING REPORTING REQUIREMENTS—Continued
          Data Element
                                                     Definition
15 Analytical Accuracy






16 Spiking Concentration


17 Presence/Absence  ...
Xi is the concentration observed in spiked field sample minus the concentration
 observed in unspiked field sample
X2 is the concentration observed in duplicate spiked field sample minus the con-
 centration observed in unspiked field sample
Accuracy describes how close a result is to the true value measured through the
 use of spiked field samples  For purposes  of unregulated contaminant moni-
 toring, accuracy is defined as the percent recovery of the contaminant in the
 spiked matrix sample analyzed in the same analytical batch as the sample result
 being  reported and calculated using
% recovery = [(amt found in spiked sample—ami found in sample)/amt spiked) x
 100%
The concentration of method analyte(s) added to a sample to be analyzed for cal-
 culating analytical precision and  accuracy where the value reported use the
 same  unit of measure reported for Analytical Results
Reserved.
  (e) How must I report this information?
(1) You must report results from moni-
toring-  under  this  rule  using-  EPA's
electronic reporting system. For qual-
ity control purposes, you must instruct
the  org-anization(s) responsible for the
analysis  of unregulated  contaminant
samples taken under  §141.40  to enter
the  results into the reporting- system,
in the  format specified by EPA. You
are  responsible for reviewing  those  re-
sults and approving the reporting (via
the  electronic system) of the results to
EPA. You must also provide a copy of
the  results to the  State, as directed by
the State.
  (2) If you report more than one set of
valid results  for  the  same  sampling
point and the  same sampling event (for
example, because  you have  had more
than one organization  (e.g., a labora-
tory)  analyze  replicate  samples  col-
lected under  §141.40,   or  because  you
have collected multiple samples during
a single monitoring event at  the same
sampling point), EPA will use the high-
est  of the reported  values as  the offi-
cial result.
  (f) Does the laboratory to which I send
samples report the  results for me? While
you must  instruct  the  organization
conducting  unregulated  contaminant
analysis (e.g.,  a  laboratory)  to enter
the  results  into  EPA's electronic  re-
porting system, you are responsible  for
reviewing  and approving the submis-
sion of the results to  EPA. If the ana-
lytical organization or laboratory can-
not  enter  these   data  for  you using
EPA's  electronic  reporting  system,
then you may explain  to  EPA in writ-
ing  the  reasons why alternate report-
             ing  is  necessary  and  must  receive
             EPA's approval  to use an alternate re-
             porting procedure.
               (g) Can I  report previously  collected
             data to meet the  testing and reporting re-
             quirements for the contaminants listed in
             §141.40(a)(3)? Yes,  as long  as the data
             meet  the   specific  requirements   of
             §141.40(a)(3), (4), (5), and Appendix A of
             §141.40 and  you report the  data with
             the information specified in  paragraph
             (d) of this section.

             [64 FR 50611, Sept. 17, 1999, as amended at 66
             FR 2300,  Jan. 11, 2001; 66 FR 27215, May 16,
             2001;  67 FR 11046, Mar. 12, 2002]

             Subpart  E—Special   Regulations,
                  Including  Monitoring  Regula-
                  tions and  Prohibition  on Lead
                  Use

             § 141.40  Monitoring  requirements  for
                unregulated  contaminants.
               (a) Requirements for owners  and opera-
             tors of public water systems. (1) Do I have
             to  monitor for unregulated contaminants?
               (i) Transient systems. If you  own or op-
             erate   a   transient   non-community
             water system, you do not have to mon-
             itor  for unregulated contaminants.
               (ii) Large systems not purchasing their
             entire water supply from another system.
             If you own or operate a wholesale or re-
             tail  public water system (other than a
             transient  system)  that   serves more
             than 10,000 persons, as determined by
             the State, and do not purchase your en-
             tire  water supply  from another public
             water system, you must monitor as fol-
             lows:
                                       419

-------
§141.40
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (A) You must monitor  for  the  un-
regulated contaminants on  List  1 of
Table  1,  Unregulated  Contaminant
Monitoring  Regulation (1999)  List, in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
  (B) You must monitor for the unregu-
lated contaminants on List 2 of Table
1,   Unregulated  Contaminant Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List,  in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section, if notified
by your State or EPA that  you are part
of the Screening Surveys.
  (C) You must monitor for the unregu-
lated contaminants on List 3 of Table
1,   Unregulated  Contaminant Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List,  in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section, if notified
by your State or EPA that  you are part
of the Pre-Screen Testing.
  (iii) Large systems purchasing  their en-
tire water supply from another system. If
you own or operate a public water  sys-
tem (other  than a  transient  system)
that serves more than  10,000  persons
and purchase your entire water supply
from a wholesale or retail public water
system, you must monitor as follows:
  (A) You must monitor  for  the  un-
regulated contaminants on  List  1 of
Table  1,  Unregulated  Contaminant
Monitoring  Regulation (1999)  List, in
paragraph (a)(3)  of this section,  that
have a "sampling location"  indicated as
"distribution system".
  (B) You must monitor for the unregu-
lated contaminants on List 2 of Table
1,   Unregulated  Contaminant Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List,  in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section, that have a
"sampling location" indicated  as "dis-
tribution system" if  notified by your
State or EPA that you are part of the
Screening Surveys.
  (C) You must monitor for the unregu-
lated contaminants on List 3 of Table
1,   Unregulated  Contaminant Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List,  in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section, that have a
"sampling location" indicated  as "dis-
tribution system" if  notified by your
State or EPA that you are part of the
Pre-Screen Testing.
  (iv) Small systems not purchasing their
entire water  supply from another system.
If you own  or operate a public water
system (other than a transient system)
that serves 10,000 or fewer  persons  and
do not purchase your entire water sup-
ply from another public water system,
you must monitor as follows:
  (A)  You  must  monitor  for  the  un-
regulated  contaminants on  List  1 of
Table  1,   Unregulated  Contaminant
Monitoring  Regulation (1999)  List, in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, if  you
are notified by your State  or EPA that
you are part  of the State Monitoring:
Plan for small systems.
  (B) You must monitor for the unregu-
lated  contaminants on List 2 of Table
1,   Unregulated  Contaminant  Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List, in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section, if you are
notified by your State  or EPA that  you
are part of the Screening Surveys.
  (C) You must monitor for the unregu-
lated  contaminants on List 3 of Table
1,   Unregulated  Contaminant  Moni-
toring1 Regulation (1999) List, in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section, if you are
notified by your State  or EPA that  you
are part of the Pre-Screen Testing.
  (v) Small systems  purchasing their en-
tire water supply from another system. If
you own or operate a public water sys-
tem (other  than a transient  system)
that serves 10,000 or fewer  persons  and
purchase your entire water supply from
another public water system, you must
monitor as follows:
  (A)  You  must  monitor  for  the  un-
regulated  contaminants on  List  1 of
Table  1,   Unregulated  Contaminant
Monitoring  Regulation (1999)  List, in
paragraph (a)(3)  of this section,  that
have a "sampling location"  indicated as
"distribution system"  if you are noti-
fied by your State or EPA that you are
part of the  State Monitoring Plan for
small systems.
  (B) You must monitor for the unregu-
lated  contaminants on List 2 of Table
1,   Unregulated  Contaminant  Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List, in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section, that have a
"sampling location" indicated as "dis-
tribution system" if you are notified by
your State or EPA that you are part of
the Screening Surveys.
  (C) You must monitor for the unregu-
lated  contaminants on List 3 of Table
1,   Unregulated  Contaminant  Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List, in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section, that have a
"sampling location" indicated as "dis-
tribution system" if you are notified by
                                     420

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.40
your State or EPA that you are part of
the Pre-Screen Testing.
  (2) How would I be selected for the mon-
itoring under the  State Monitoring Plan,
the Screening Surveys,  or the Pre-Screen
Testing?  (i)  State  Monitoring  Plan.
Only a representative sample of small
systems  must monitor for unregulated
contaminants.  EPA will select  a na-
tional  representative  sample of small
public water systems in each  State
through  the use  of  a random number
generator.  Selection will  be weighted
by population served within each sys-
tem water  source  type  (surface  or
ground water) and system size category
(systems serving  25-500, 501-3,300, and
3,301-10,000 persons). EPA may allocate
additional   systems  to  water  source
types or system  size categories to in-
crease the statistical  inferential  abil-
ity for those categories. EPA will also
select a  small  group of systems to  be
"Index systems."   Systems selected  as
Index systems  are required to provide
information about their site and oper-
ation that will serve to  allow extrapo-
lation of their results to other systems
of similar  size, rather than collecting
detailed  information  at every  small
system. Each State will have the op-
portunity to make some modifications
to the list of small  systems that EPA
selects. You will be  notified by  the
State or EPA if your system is part of
the final State Monitoring Plan.
  (ii) Screening Surveys. The purpose of
the Screening Surveys is to determine
the  occurrence  of  contaminants  in
drinking water or sources of drinking
water  for  which  analytical  methods
have recently been developed for un-
regulated  contaminant   monitoring.
EPA will select up to  300 systems to
participate in each  survey by using a
random number generator. You will be
notified  by the  State or EPA if your
system  is  selected  for  monitoring
under the Screening Surveys.
  (iii) Pre-screen Testing. The purpose of
Pre-Screen Testing is to determine the
occurrence of contaminants  for  which
EPA needs to evaluate new analytical
methods in locations where  the con-
taminants are most likely to be found.
EPA will select up to  200 systems to
participate in this testing after consid-
ering  the characteristics of  the con-
taminants, precipitation, system oper-
ation,  and environmental conditions.
You will be  notified by  the  State or
EPA that  your system has  been se-
lected  for monitoring under  the Pre-
Screen Testing program.
  (3) For which contaminants must I mon-
itor? Lists 1, 2 and 3 of unregulated con-
taminants are listed in the following
table:
         TABLE 1—UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING REGULATION (1999) LIST

                      List 1—Assessment Monitoring Chemical Contaminants

1 -Contaminant

2, 4-dimtrotoluene

2, 6 dimtrotoluene .

Acetochlor

DCPA mono-acid degradate h








2-CAS reg-
istry number

121-14-2

606-20-2

34256-82-1

887-54-7








3-Analytical
methods

EPA Method
5252«
EPA Method
5252'
EPA Method
525 2 •>
EPA Method
5151", EPA
Method 51 5.2-,
EPA Method
515 3'J, EPA
Method 5154"-,
D5317-93",
AOAC99232'

4-Mimmum
reporting
level

2ng/L"

2 Ma'L'

2ng/L°

1 H9/L =








5-Samplmg
location

EPTDSi

EPTDS1

EPTDS'

EPTDS <







6-Penod
during
which
monitoring
to be
completed
2001-2003

2001-2003

2001-2003

2001-2003







                                     421

-------
§141.40
40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
     TABLE 1—UNREGULATED CONTAMINANT MONITORING REGULATION (1999) LIST—Continued

                               List 1—Assessment Monitoring Chemical Contaminants
1 -Contaminant
DCPA di-acid degradate h







4,4'-DDE






EPTC




Molinate




MTBE






Nitrobenzene



Perchlorate

Terbacil




2-CAS reg-
istry number
2136-79-0







72-55-9






759-94-4




2212-67-1




1634-0
EPA Method
5242', D5790-
95 », SM6210D",
SM6200B"
EPA Method
31401
EPA Method
507', EPA
Method 5252',
D5475-93",
AOAC 991 07 =
4-Mmimum
reporting
level
1 ug/L =







08ug/L"






1 ug/L«




0 9 ug/Le




5 uxj/L s






10 ng/Le



4ng/L«>

2 ng/L=




5-Samphng
location
EPTDS '







EPTDS'






EPTDS'




EPTDS'




EPTDS'






EPTDS'



EPTDS1

EPTDS'




6-Penod
during
which
monitoring
to be
completed
2001-2003







2001-2003






2001-2003




2001-2003




2001-2003






2001-2003



2001-2003

2001-2003




  Column headings are
  1—Chemical or microbiological contaminant  the name of the contaminants to be analyzed.
  2—CAS (Chemical Abstract Service Number) Registry No or Identification Number  a unique number identifying the chemical
contaminants.                            *.
  3—Analytical Methods  method numbers identifying the methods that must be used to test the contaminants
  4—Minimum Reporting Level the value and  unit of measure at or above which the concentration or density of the contaminant
must be measured  using the Approved Analytical Methods
  5—Sampling Location the locations within a PWS at which samples must be collected
  6—Years During Which Monitoring to be Completed  The years during which the sampling and testing are to occur for the indi-
cated contaminant
  The procedures shall be done in accordance with the documents  listed next in these footnotes  The incorporation by reference
of the following documents  listed in footnotes b-d, i, k and I was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U S C 552(a) and 1  CFR part 51  Copies of the documents may be obtained from the following sources Information re-
garding obtaining these documents can be obtained from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 800-426-4791 Documents may be
inspected at  EPA's Drinking Water Docket, 401  M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460 (Telephone 202-260-3027), or at the
National Archives and Records Administration  (NARA)  For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to http //www archives gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations html
  •The version of the EPA methods which you must follow for this Rule are listed at § 141 24 (e)
                                                    422

-------
Environmental Protection  Agency
§141.40
  h Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1996,  1998 and 1999, Vol  11 02, American Society for Testing and Materials  Method
D5812-96, "Standard Test Method for Determination of Organochlonne Pesticides in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chroma-
tography", is located in the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1998 and 1999, Vol  11  02 Methods D5790-95, "Standard Test
Method for Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrom-
etry", D5475-93, "Standard Test Method for Nitrogen- and Phosphorus-Containing Pesticides in  Water by Gas Chromatography
with  a Nitrogen-Phosphorus Detector",  and D5317-93, "Standard Test Method for Determination of Chlorinated Organic Acid
Compounds  in Water by Gas Chromatography with  an  Electron Capture  Detector" are  located in the Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, 1996 and  1998, Vol 11 02 Copies may be obtained from the American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr
Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428
  = Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemist) International,  Sixteenth  Edition, 4th Revi-
sion, 1998, Volume I,  AOAC International, First Union National Bank Lockbox,  PO Box 75198, Baltimore, MD 21275-5198 800-
379-2622
  dSM 6210 D is only found in the 18th and 19th editions of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
1992 and 1995, American Public Health Association,  either edition may be used SM 6200 B and 6200 C are only found in the
20th edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1998  Copies may be obtained from the Amer-
ican  Public Health Association, 1015 Fifteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20005
  ' Minimum Reporting  Level  determined  by multiplying  by  10 the least sensitive  method's detection limit (detection limit
=standard deviation times the Student's t value for 99% confidence level with n-1 degrees of freedom), or when available, multi-
plying by 5 the least sensitive method's estimated detection limit (where the estimated detection limit equals the concentration of
compound yielding approximately a 5 to 1 signal to noise ratio or the calculated detection limit, whichever is greater)
  fEntry  Points to the Distribution System (EPTDS), after treatment, representing each non-emergency water source in use over
the twelve-month period of monitoring  this only includes entry points for sources in operation during the months in which sam-
pling is to occur Sampling must  occur at the EPTDS, unless the State has specified other sampling points that are used for
compliance monitoring under 40 CFR 141.24 (f)(1), (2), and (3)  See 40 CFR 141 40(a)(5)(n)(C) for a complete explanation of re-
quirements, including the use of source (raw) water sampling points
  e Minimum Reporting Levels  (MRL) for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) determined  by  multiplying either the published de-
tection limit or 0 5 ng/I times 10, whichever is greater The detection limit of 0.5 ns'L (0.0005 mg/L) was selected to conform to
VOC detection limit requirements of 40 CFR 141 24(f)(17)(E)
  h The approved methods do  not allow for the identification and quantitation of the individual acids The single analytical result
obtained  should be reported as total DCPA mono- and di-acid degradates
  'EPA Method 515 3, "Determination of Chlorinated Acids in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction, Denvatization and Gas
Chromatography with  Electron  Capture Detection," Revision 1 0 July 1996  EPA 815-R-00-014,  "Methods for the Determination
of  Organic and Inorganic compounds in Drinking Water, Volume 1," August 2000 Available from the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, NTIS PB2000-106981, U S Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road,  Springfield, Virginia 22161  The toll
free  number is 800-553-6847 Alternatively, the method can be  assessed  and  downloaded directly on-line at www epa gov/
safewater/methods/sourcalt html
  1 Since EPA Method 515 3 does not include a solvent wash step following hydrolysis, the parent DCPA is not removed prior to
analysis,  therefore,  only  non-detect data may be reported using EPA  Method 5153  All samples with  results above the MRL
must be analyzed by one of the other approved methods
  KEPA Method 515 4, "Determination of Chlorinated Acids in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid Microextraction, Denvatization and
Fast Gas Chromatography with Electron Capture  Detection," Revision 1 0, April 2000, EPA #815/8-00/001 Available by request-
ing a copy from the EPA Safe  Drinking Water Hotline within the United States at 800-426-4791 (Hours are Monday through Fri-
day,  excluding federal holidays, from 9 a.m. to 5.30 p m  Eastern  Time)  Alternatively, the method can be assessed and
downloaded directly on-line at www epa gov/safewater/methods/sourcalt html
  'EPA Method 3140, "Determination of Perchlorate in Drinking Water Using Ion Chromatography," Revision 1 0, EPA 815-8-
99-003, November 1999 EPA 815-R-00-014, "Methods for the Determination of Organic and Inorganic Compounds in Drinking
Water, Volume 1," August 2000 Available from the National Technical Information Service, NTIS PB2000-106981, U S  Depart-
ment of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161  The toll free number  is 800-553-6847  Alternatively, the
method can be assessed and downloaded directly on-line at www epa gov/safewater/methods/sourcalt html
  m MRL  was established at a  concentration, which is at least 1/4th the lowest known adverse health concentration, at which ac-
ceptable  precision and accuracy has been demonstrated in  spiked matrix samples
  "Sample preservation  techniques and holding times specified in EPA Method 5242 must be used by laboratories using either
EPA Method 502 2 or Standard Methods 6200C
List 2 — Screening Survey Chemical Contaminants
1 -Contaminant
1,2-
diphenylhydrazm-
e





2-methyl-phenol
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,4-dinitrophenol
2,4,6-
trichlorophenol
Alachlor ESA
Diazmon







Disulfoton
2-CAS registry
number
122-66-7 .







95-48-7
120-83-2
51-28-5 .
88-06-2

Reserved"
333-41-5







298-04-4
3-Analytical
methods
EPA Method 526->







EPA Method 528 1-
EPA Method 528 "
EPA Method 528"
EPA Method 5281-

Reserved"
EPA Method 526 >







EPA Method 526 *
4-Minimum
reporting
level
0 5 u.g/L







1 ug/L<
1 ug/Lf .
5ug/Lf
1 ug/L1 	

Reserved" 	
05ng/L<







05 ug/Lf,
5-Samplmg
location
EPTDS'







EPTDS "
EPTDS'
EPTDS'
EPTDS'

Reserved" 	
EPTDS'







EPTDS'
6-Penod during
which
monitoring to be
completed
2001— Selected
Systems serving
<10,000 per-
sons,
2002— Selected
systems serving
> 10,000 per-
sons
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above

Reserved d
2001— Seleected
Systems serving
<1 0,000 per-
sons,
2002— Selected
systems serving
> 10,000 per-
sons
Same as above
                                                      423

-------
§141.40
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                  List 2—Screening Survey Chemical Contaminants
1 -Contaminant
Diuron
Fonofos .
Ltnuron
Nitrobenzene
Prometon
RDX .
Terbufos






2-CAS registry
number
330-54-1
944-22-9
330-55-2
98-95-3
1610-18-0
121-82-4
13071-79-9






3-Analytical
methods
EPA Method 532 =
EPA Method 526*
EPA Method 532 =
EPA Method 526 •>
EPA Method 526-
Reserved11
EPA Method 526 »






4-Mimmum
reporting
level
1 ug/Lr
05ug/L'
1 ug/L'
05ng/L'
05ng/Lf . .
Reserved J .
05 ug/Lf






5-Samplmg
location
EPTDS'
EPTDS =
EPTDS' .
EPTDS » ...
EPTDS'
Reserved"1 . ...
EPTDS«






6-Penod during
which
monitoring to be
completed
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
Same as above
Reserved d
2001— Selected
Systems serving
<1 0,000 per-
sons;
2002-Selected sys-
tems serving >
10,000 persons
            LIST 2—SCREENING SURVEY MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS To BE SAMPLED
i _/-„„»,— „„„. 2 — Identification 3 — Analytical
1 -Contaminant number methods
Aeromonas . NA
. . EPA Method
1605"
4— Minimum re- 5 — Sampling loca-
porting level tion
0 2— CFU/1 OOmL ' Distribution Sys-
teme
6 — Period during
which monitoring
to be completed
2003
  Column headings are
  1 —Chemical or microbiological contaminant the name of the contaminants to be analyzed
  2—CAS (Chemical Abstract Service Number) Registry No  or Identification Number  a unique number identifying the chemical
contaminants
  3—Analytical Methods  method numbers identifying the methods that must be used to test the contaminants
  4—Minimum Reporting Level the value and unit of measure at or above which the concentration or density of the contaminant
must be measured using the Approved Analytical Methods
  5 —Sampling Location the locations within a PWS at which samples must be collected
  6—Years During Which Monitoring to be Completed the years during which the sampling and testing are to occur for the indi-
cated contaminant
  The procedures shall be done m accordance with the documents listed nexl in these footnotes The incorporation by reference
of the following documents listed in footnotes a-c, was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5
DSC 552(a) and 1  CFR part 51. Copies of the documents may be obtained from the following sources Information regarding
obtaining these documents can  be obtained from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 800-426-4791  Copies of the documents
may be  obtained from  the sources  listed in these footnotes. Information regarding obtaining  these documents can be obtained
from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 800-426-4791  Documents may be inspected at EPA's Drinking Water Docket, 401 M
Street,  SW , Washington, DC 20460 (Telephone  202-260-3027),  or at the National Archives  and Records  Administration
(NARA)  For information on the availability of this material at  NARA, call 202-741-6030,  or go to http://www archives gov/
federal	regisler/code_of	federal	regulations/ibr^_locations html
  a EPA Method 526, "Determination of Selected Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by  Solid Phase Extraction
and  Capillary Column  Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry  (GC/MS),"  Revision 1 0,  June  2000  EPA  815-R-00-014,
"Methods for the Determination of Organic and Inorganic Compounds in Drinking Water, Volume 1," August 2000. Available from
the  National Technical Information Service,  NTIS PB2000-106981, US  Department of  Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road,
Springfield, Virginia 22161  The  toll free number is 800-553-6847 Alternatively, the method  can be assessed and downloaded
directly on-line at www  epa.gov/safewater/methods/sourcaft html
  i> EPA Method 528, "Determination of Phenols In Drinking Water by Solid Phase Extraction and Capillary Column Gas Chroma-
tography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)," Revision 1  0, April  2000  EPA 815-R-00-014, "Methods  for the Determination of Or-
ganic and Inorganic Compounds in Drinking Water, Volume 1." August 2000 Available from  the National Technical Information
Service, NTIS PB2000-106981,  U S Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 The toll free
number  is 800-553-6847. Alternatively,  the method  can  be  assessed  and  downloaded  directly  on-line at  wwwepagov/
nerlcwww/ordmeth htm
  c EPA Method 532, "Determination of Phenylurea  Compounds in Drinking  Water by Solid Phase Extraction and High Perform-
ance Liquid Chromatography with UV Detection," Revision 1 0, June 2000  EPA 815-R-00-014, "Methods for the Determination
of Organic and Inorganic Compounds in Drinking Water, Volume 1," August 2000. Available from the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, NTIS PB2000-106981, U S Department of Commerce,  5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 The toll
free number is 800-553^-6847  Alternatively,  the method can be assessed and downloaded directly on-line at www epa gov/
safewater/methods/sourcalt html
  dTo be specified at a later time
  e Entry Points to the Distribution System (EPTDS), after treatment, representing each non-emergency water source in use over
the  twelve-month period of monitoring  this only includes entry points for sources in operation during the months m which sam-
pling is  to occur Sampling must occur at the EPTDS, source water sampling points are not permitted for List 2 contaminant
monitoring
  'Minimum Reporting  Level represents the value of the lowest concentration precision and accuracy determination made during
metnods development and documented in the method If method options are permitted, the concentiation used was for the least
sensitive option
                                                      424

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                      §141.40
  s Three samples must be taken from the distribution system, which is owned or controlled by the selected PWS The sample
locations must include one sample from a point (MD from §141 35(d)(3), Table 1) where the disinfectant residual is representa-
tive of the distribution system This sample location may be selected from sample locations which have been previously identified
for samples to be analyzed for coliform indicator bacteria Coliform sample locations encompass a variety of sites including mid-
point samples which may contain a disinfectant residual that is typical of the system Coliform sample locations are described in
40 CFR 141 21  This same approach must be used for the Aeromonas  midpoint sample where the disinfectant residual would
not have declined and would be typical for the distribution system Additionally, two samples must be taken  from two different lo-
cations  the distal or dead-end location in the distribution system (MR from §141 35(d)(3), Table 1}, avoiding disinfectant booster
stations, and from a location where previous determinations have indicated the lowest disinfectant residual in the distribution sys-
tem (LD from §141 35(d)(3), Table 1)  If these two locations of distal and low disinfectant residual sites coincide, then the sec-
ond sample must be taken at a location between the MD and MR sites  Locations in the distribution system where the disinfect-
ant residual is expected to be low are similar to TTHM sampling points  Sampling locations for TTHMs are described in 63 FR
69468
  hEPA Method 1605 "Aeromonas in Finished Water by Membrane Filtration using Ampicillm-Dextrin Agar with Vancomycin
(ADA-V)",  October 2001, EPA # 821-R-01-034   The method can  be  accessed and downloaded directly  on-line  at
www epa gov/micmbes

          List 3—Pre-screen Testing Radionuclides To Be Sampled After Notice of Analytical Methods Availability
1 -Contaminant
Lead-210
Polonium-210
2-CAS registry
number
14255-04-0
13981-52-7
3-Analytical meth-
ods
Reserved d
Reserved •>
4-Mmimum
reporting
level
Reserved J
Reserved J
5-Samphng
location
Reserved -
Reserved d
6-Pertod during
which
monitoring to be
completed
Reserved d
Reserved J
         List 3—Pre-screen Testing Microorganisms To Be Sampled After Notice of Analytical Methods Availability
1 -Contaminant
Cyanobactena
(blue-green
algae, other
freshwater algae
and their toxins)
Echoviruses
Coxsackieviruses
Helicobacter pylori
Microsporidia
Calciviruses
Aden ovi ruses
2-ldentification
number
Reserved " .




Reserved d
Reserved a
Reserved J .
Reserved d .
Reserved " .
Reserved-1 .
3-Analytical meth-
ods
Reserved-1




Reserved"
Reserved3
Reserved J
Reserved •>
Reserved a
Reserved d
4-Minimum report-
ing level
Reserved d




Reserved •'
Reserved •'
Reserved d
Reserved •'
Reserved d
Reserved d
5-Samplmg loca-
tion
Reserved d




Reserved-1
Reserved"
Reserved3
Reserved d
Reserved •'
Reserved A
6-Penod during
which monitoring to
be completed
Reserved »




Reserved J
Reserved *
Reserved d
Reserved d
Reserved d
Reserved d
  Column headings are
  1-Chemical or microbiological contaminant the name of the contaminants to be analyzed
  2-CAS (Chemical Abstract Service Number) Registry No or Identification Number a unique number identifying the chemical
contaminants
  3-Analytical Methods method numbers identifying the methods that must be used to test the contaminants
  4-Mmimum Reporting Level the value and unit of measure at or above which the concentration or density of the contaminant
must be measured using the Approved Analytical Methods
  5-Samplmg Location the locations within a PWS at which samples must be collected
  6-Years During Which Monitoring  to be Completed the years during which the sampling and testing are to occur for the indi-
cated contaminant
  •> To be determined at a  later time
   (4)  What general  requirements  must I
follow for monitoring List 1 contaminants?
(i) All systems. You must:
   (A) Collect samples of the listed con-
taminants  in   accordance  with  para-
graph (a)(5) of  this section and Appen-
dix A of this section and any other spe-
cific  instructions  provided  to  you  by
the State or EPA,
   (B)  Analyze  the  additional  param-
eters specified below in Table 2. "Water
Quality  Parameters  to  be  Monitored
with  UCMR  Contaminants"  for  each
relevant contaminant type. You must
analyze the parameters for each sam-
pling  event  of each  sampling  point,
using the method indicated, and report
using the data elements 1  through 10 in
Table   1,  §141.35(d),  Unregulated  Con-
taminant  Monitoring  Reporting  Re-
quirements;
  (C) Review the laboratory testing re-
sults to ensure reliability; and
  (D)  Report the results as  specified in
§141.35.
                                               425

-------
§141.40
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
     TABLE 2—WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS To BE MONITORED WITH UCMR CONTAMINANTS
Parameter
pH ... .

Turbidity
Temperature
Free Disinfectant Re-
sidual



Total Disinfectant Re-
sidual


Contaminant type
Microbiological ...

Microbiological
Microbiological .
Microbiological




Microbiological



Analytical methods
EPA method
EPA Method 150 12,
EPA Method 15022.
EPA Method 180145










Standard methods 1
4500-H + B

2130 B4
2550
4500-CI D, 4500-CI F,
4500-CI G, 4500-CI
H, 4500-CICb D,
4500-CIO2 E, 4600-
O, B
4500-CI D, 4500-CI
E," 4500-CI F,
4500-CI G4, 4500-CI
I
Other
ASTM D1 293-84=,
ASTM D1293-953
GLI Method 24-6

ASTM 1253-863




ASTM D 1 253-86 3



  The procedures shall be done in accordance with the documents listed in these footnotes The incorporation by reference of
the following documents was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U S C 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51 Copies of the documents may be obtained from the sources, listed in these footnotes Information regarding obtaining
these documents can be obtained from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 800-426-4791  Documents may be inspected at
EPA's Drinking Water Docket, 401 M Street, SW,  Washington, DC 20460 (Telephone 202-260-3027), or at the National Ar-
chives and Records Administration (NARA) For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to  http //www.archives.gov/federal	register/code_of_Jederal	regulations/ibr	locations html
  •>The 18th and 19th Editions of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1992 and 1995 Methods
2130 B; 2550, 4500-CI D, E, F, G, H, I, 4500-CI02 D, E, 4500-H* B; and 4500-O, B in the 20th edition Standard Methods for
the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1998, American Public Health Association, 1015 Fifteenth St NW, Washington D C ,
20005
  2EPA Methods 150 1 and 150 2 are available from US EPA, NERL, 26 W Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 The
identical methods are also in "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," EPA-600/4-79-020, March 1983, available
from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), U S Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Roya! Rd, Springfield, Vir-
ginia 22161, PB84-128677 (Note. NTIS toll-free number is 800-553-6847.)
  3 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Editions 1994, 1996, 1998 and 1999, Volumes 11 01, American Society for Testing and
Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428 Version D1293-84, "Standard Test Methods for pH of Water"
is located in the Annual Book of ASTM Standards,  1994, Volumes 11 01 Version D1293-95, "Standard Test Methods for pH of
Water" is located in the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1996, 1998 and 1999, Volumes 11 01
  ""Technical  Notes on Drinking Water," EPA-600/R-94-173, October 1994, Available at NTIS, P895-104766
  5 "Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in  Environmental Samples," EPA-600/H-93-100, August 1993
Available at NTIS, PB94-121811
  6GLI Method 2, 'Turbidity," November 2, 1992,  Great Lakes  Instruments-lnc , 8855 North 55th St, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
53223
  (ii) Large systems. In addition to para-
graph (a)(4)(i) of this section, you must
arrange  for testing of the samples ac-
cording  to  the  methods specified for
each contaminant  in Table  1,  Unregu-
lated Contaminant Monitoring Regula-
tion (1999)  List, in paragraph  (a)(3) of
this section, and in Appendix A of this
section.
  (iii)  Small  systems.  Unless  directed
otherwise by the State or EPA, in addi-
tion to paragraph  (a)(4)(i) of this sec-
tion , you must:
  (A) Properly receive, store, maintain
and use the sampling equipment sent
to you from the laboratory  designated
by EPA;
  (B) Sample at the times specified by
the  State or the EPA;
  (C) Collect  and pack samples in ac-
cordance with the  instructions sent to
you by  the laboratory  designated  by
EPA; and
  (D)  Send  the samples  to the labora-
tory designated by EPA.
  (5) What  specific sampling and qual-
ity control requirements must I follow
for monitoring of List 1 contaminants?
(i) All systems. Unless the State or EPA
informs you of other sampling arrange-
ments, you must comply with the  fol-
lowing requirements:
  (A)  Sample  collection  and shipping
time. If you must  ship the samples for
testing, you  must  collect  the samples
early enough in the day to  allow ade-
quate  time  to send  the  samples  for
overnight   delivery  to the  laboratory
since  some samples must be processed
at  the  laboratory  within  30 hours of
collection.  You must  not collect sam-
ples on Friday,  Saturday or Sunday be-
cause sampling on these  days,  would
not allow samples to be shipped and re-
ceived  at  the  laboratory   within  30
hours.
  (B)  No  compositing  of samples.  You
must not composite (that is, combine,
mix  or blend) the samples.   You must
collect, preserve  and test each  sample
separately.
                                           426

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                §141.40
  (C)  Review  and  reporting  of results.
After  you have received the laboratory
results,  you  must  review  and confirm
the  system information  and  data re-
garding sample collection and test re-
sults.  You must report the  results as
provided in §141.35.
  (ii) Large systems. In addition to para-
graph (a)(5)(i) of this section,  you must
comply with the following:
  (A) Timeframe.  You must collect the
samples  in one  twelve-month  period
during  the years indicated in column 6
of Table 1, Unregulated Contaminant
Monitoring Regulation (1999) List.
  (B) Frequency.  You must collect the
samples within the timeframe and ac-
cording  to  the   following  frequency
specified  by  contaminant  type  and
water source type:
        TABLE 3—MONITORING FREQUENCY BY CONTAMINANT AND WATER SOURCE TYPES
Contaminant type
Chemical









Microbiological





i 	
Water source type
Surface water





Ground water



Surface and ground
water



Timeframe
Twelve (12) months





Twelve (12) months



Twelve (12) months





Frequency
Four quarterly samples taken as follows Select
either the first, second, or third month of a
quarter and sample in that same month of
each of four (4) consecutive quarters3 to en-
sure that one of those sampling events oc-
curs during the vulnerable time b
Two (2) times in a year taken as follows Sam-
ple during one (1) month of the vulnerable
time" and during one (1) month five (5) to
seven (7) months earlier or later c
Six (6) times in a year taken as follows Select
either the first, second, or third month of a
quarter and sample in that same month of
each of four (4) consecutive quarters, and
sample an additional 2 months during the
warmest (vulnerable) quarter of the year d
  •"Select either the first, second, or third month of a quarter and sample in that same month of each of four (4) consecutive
quarters" means that you must monitor during each of the four (4) months of either January, April, July, October, or February,
May, August, November, or March, June, September, December
  <• "Vulnerable time" means May 1 through July 31, unless the State or EPA informs you that ft has selected a different time pe-
riod for sampling as your system's vulnerable time
  1 "Sample during one (1) month of the vulnerable time and during one (1) month five (5) to seven (7) months earlier or later"
means, for example, that if you select May as your "vulnerable time" month to sample, then one (1) month five (5) to seven (7)
months earlier would be either October, November or December of the preceding year, and one (1) month five (5) to seven (7)
months later would be either, October, November, or December of the same year
  «This means that you must monitor during each of the six (6) months of either January, April, July, August, September, Octo-
ber, or February, May, July, August, September, November, or March, June, July, August, September, December, unless the
State or EPA informs you that a different vulnerable quarter has been selected for your system
  (C) Location. You must collect sam-
ples at the location specified for each
listed contaminant in column 5 of the
Table 1, UCMR (1999) List, in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section.  The sampling lo-
cation for chemical contaminants must
be the entry point to the distribution
system or the compliance  monitoring
point  specified  by  the State or EPA
under 40 CFR 141.24 (f)(l), (2), and (3).
Except as provided in this paragraph
(a)(5)(ii)(C),  if the compliance  moni-
toring point as specified by the State is
for source (raw)  water and any of the
contaminants  in  paragraph   (a)(3)  of
this  section  are  detected,  then  you
must complete the source water moni-
toring for the indicated timeframe and
also sample at the entry point  to  the
distribution system representative  of
the affected source water only for  the
contaminant(s)  found  in   the  source
water  over  the  next  twelve month
timeframe,  beginning  in the  next re-
quired  monitoring period as  indicated
in  paragraph (a)(5)(ii)(B),  Table  3  of
this section,  even though  monitoring
might extend beyond the last year indi-
cated in column 6, Period during which
monitoring to be completed, in Table 1
of paragraph (a)(3).  Exception: If the
State  or  EPA  determines that  sam-
pling at the entry point to the distribu-
tion system is unnecessary because no
treatment was instituted between the
source  water and the distribution sys-
tem that would affect  measurement of
the  contaminants listed  in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section, then  you do not
have to sample at the entry  point  to
the  distribution  system.  Note:  The
sampling for List 2 chemical contami-
nants must be at the entry point to the
                                        427

-------
§141.40
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
distribution  system,  as specified  in
Table 1, List 2.
  (D) Sampling  instructions. You must
follow the sampling procedure for the
method specified in column 3 of List 1
of Table  1, Unregulated Contaminant
Monitoring Regulation  (1999) List,  in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, for
each contaminant.
  (E) Testing  and  analytical methods.
For each listed contaminant, you must
use the analytical method specified in
column 3  of List 1  of Table 1, Unregu-
lated Contaminant  Monitoring Regula-
tion (1999) List, in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section, the  minimum reporting
levels in column 4 of List 1 of Table 1,
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
Regulation  (1999)  List,  in  paragraph
(a)(3) of this section,  and the quality
control procedures  specified in  Appen-
dix A of this section.
  (P) Sampling deviations. If you do not
collect a sample according to the pro-
cedures specified for a listed contami-
nant, you must resample within  14 days
of observing the occurrence of the error
(which may include notification  from
the  laboratory  that  you  must re-
sample) following the procedures speci-
fied for the method. (This  resampling
is not for  confirmation sampling but to
correct the sampling error.)
  (G-) Testing. (1) Except  as provided in
paragraph (a)(5)(ii)(G)(2)  and (3)  of this
section, you must arrange for the  test-
ing of the contaminants identified in
List 1 of  Table 1 by a laboratory cer-
tified  under  §141.28  for compliance
analysis using   any of the  analytical
methods listed  in  column  3 for  each
contaminant in List 1 of Table 1, Un-
regulated   Contaminant  Monitoring
Regulation  (1999)  List,  in  paragraph
(a)(3) of this section, whether you use
the  EPA  analytical methods or  non-
EPA methods listed in List  1 of Table
1. Laboratories  are automatically cer-
tified for the analysis of UCMR  con-
taminants in List 1 of Table 1  if  they
are already certified to  conduct  com-
pliance monitoring for a contaminant
included in the same method being ap-
proved  for UCMR  analysis. Labora-
tories  certified  under  §141.28 for  com-
pliance analysis using  EPA  Method
515.3  are  automatically approved  to
conduct  UCMR  analysis using  EPA
Method 515.4.
  (2) You must arrange for the testing
of Perchlorate as identified in List 1 of
Table 1 by a laboratory certified under
§141.28 for compliance analysis  using
an   approved   ion   chromatographic
method as listed in §141.28 and that has
analyzed and successfully passed the
Performance Testing (PT) Program ad-
ministered by EPA.
  (3) You must arrange for the testing
of the chemical  contaminants  identi-
fied in List 2 of Table 1 by a laboratory
certified under §141.28 for compliance
analysis using EPA Method 525.2 if per-
forming  UCMR  analysis  using  EPA
Methods 526 or 528, or a laboratory cer-
tified  under  §141.28  for  compliance
analysis using EPA Methods 549.1  or
549.2  if  performing  UCMR  analysis
using EPA Method  532.  You must ar-
range  for  the testing for  Aeromonas
using the approved  method as  identi-
fied in List 2 of Table 1 by a laboratory
which is both certified under §141.28 for
compliance analysis for  coliform indi-
cator bacteria using an EPA approved
membrane  filtration  procedure and
which  also has been granted  approval
for UCMR  monitoring of Aeromonas by
successfully passing the Aeromonas Per-
formance Testing (PT) Program admin-
istered by EPA.
  (ill) Small systems that  are part of the
State Monitoring Plan. Unless directed
otherwise by the State or EPA, in addi-
tion to paragraph (aX5)(i) of  this sec-
tion, you  must comply  with the fol-
lowing:
  (A)   Timeframe  and  frequency.  You
must collect samples at the times spec-
ified for you by  the State  or EPA,
within the timeframe specified in para-
graph  (a)(5)(ii)(A) of this section and
according to the frequency specified in
paragraph  (a)(5)(ii)(B) of this section
for the contaminant  type  and  water
source type.
  (B) Location. You  must collect sam-
ples at the locations specified for you
by the State or EPA.
  (C) Sampling deviations. If you  do not
collect a  sample according to the in-
structions  provided to you for a listed
contaminant, then you must report the
deviation on the sample reporting form
that you send to  the laboratory with
the samples. You must resample fol-
lowing  instructions that you will  be
                                     428

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.40
sent from EPA's designated laboratory
or the State.
  (D) Sample kits. You must store and
maintain  the  sample collection kits
sent to you  by EPA's designated lab-
oratory in a secure place until used for
sampling. You should read the instruc-
tions for each kit when you receive  it.
If indicated  in the kit's instructions,
you  must freeze  the cold pa,cks. The
sample  kit  will include all necessary
containers, packing- materials and cold
packs,  instructions for collecting the
sample and  sample treatment (such  as
dechlorination  or preservation), report
forms for each sample,  contact name
and  telephone number for the labora-
tory, and  a prepaid return  shipping
docket and return address label. If any
of the materials listed in the kit's in-
structions are  not included or arrive
damaged,  you must notify  EPA's des-
ignated laboratory  which sent you the
sample collection kits.
  (E) Sampling  instructions.  You must
comply with the instructions sent  to
you  by the State  or EPA  concerning
the use of containers, collection (how
to    fill     the     sample    bottle),
dechlorination and/or preservation, and
sealing  and preparing the sample and
shipping containers for shipment. You
must also comply with the instructions
sent to you  by EPA's designated lab-
oratory  concerning  the  handling  of
sample containers for specific contami-
nants.
  (F) Duplicate samples. EPA will select
systems in the State Monitoring Plan
that must collect duplicate samples for
quality control. If your system is se-
lected,  you  will  receive two sample
kits that you must use.  You must use
the same  sampling protocols for both
sets  of samples, following the instruc-
tions in the duplicate sample kit.
  (G) Sampling  forms. You must com-
pletely fill out the sampling forms sent
to you by the laboratory, including the
data elements  1  through 4  listed  in
§141.35(d) for each  sample.  If EPA re-
quests  that  you conduct field analysis
of water quality  parameters  specified
in paragraph (a)(4)(i)(B) of this section,
you  must also  complete the  sampling
form to include  the information  for
data elements  5  through 10  listed  in
§141.35(d)  for each  sample. You must
sign and date the sampling forms.
  (H) Sample submission. Once you have
collected  the  samples and  completely
filled in the sampling- forms, you must
send the  samples  and  the sampling
forms to  the laboratory designated in
your instructions.
  (6) What additional requirements must I
follow if my system is selected as an Index
system? If  your system is selected as an
Index system  in  the  State  Monitoring
Plan, you  must assist the State or EPA
in identifying appropriate sampling lo-
cations and provide  information  on
which wells and  intakes are in use at
the time  of sampling, well casing and
screen depths (if  known) for  those
wells, and the pumping- rate  of  each
well or intake at the time of sampling.
  (7) What must I do if my  system is se-
lected for  the Screening  Surveys  or Pre-
Screen  Testing?   (i)  All systems.  You
must:
  (A) Analyze  the additional  param-
eters    specified    in    paragraph
§141.40(a)(4)(i), Table  2,  "Water Quality
Parameters  to  be  Monitored  with
UCMB Contaminants" for each relevant
contaminant type. You must  analyze
the parameters for each sampling event
of  each   sampling  point,  using  the
method indicated,  and report  the re-
sults using the data elements 1 through
10 in Table 1, §141.35(d), Unregulated
Contaminant Monitoring- Reporting re-
quirements;
  (B) Review the laboratory results to
ensure reliability; and
  (C) Report the  results as specified in
§141.35.
  (ii) Large systems. If your  system
serves  over 10,000  persons, you must
collect and  arrange for testing of the
contaminants  in  List 2 and List 3 of
Table  1,   Unregulated  Contaminant
Monitoring  Regulation (1999) List, in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, in ac-
cordance with the requirements set out
in paragraphs  (a)(4) and (5)  of this sec-
tion,  with  one  exception: you must
sample  only  at  sampling locations
specified in Table 1. You must send the
samples to one of the laboratories ap-
proved under  paragraph (G), this sec-
tion. You are also responsible  for re-
porting these  results as  required in
§141.35.
  (iii) Small systems. If your  system
serves 10,000 or fewer persons, you must
collect samples in accordance with the
                                    429

-------
§141.40
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
instructions sent to you by the EPA or
State,  or. if informed by the EPA or
State that the EPA or State will col-
lect  the sample, you  must assist  the
State or EPA in identifying the appro-
priate sampling locations and in taking
the samples. EPA will report the re-
sults to you and the State.
  (8) What is a violation of this Rule? (i)
Any failure to monitor in accordance
with §141.40(a)(3) through (7) and  Ap-
pendix A is a monitoring violation, (ii)
Any failure  to report in accordance
with §141.35 is a reporting violation.
  (b) Requirements for  State  and Tribal
Participation. (1) How can I. as the di-
rector  of a  State or  Tribal  drinking
water program,  participate  in unregu-
lated contaminant monitoring, includ-
ing Assessment Monitoring  (which in-
cludes  the State Monitoring'  Plan for
small systems), the Screening Surveys,
and Pre-Screen Testing of all systems?
You can enter into a  Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) with the EPA  that
describes your State's or Tribe's activi-
ties to:
  (i) Accept or modify  the initial plan.
EPA will first specify the systems serv-
ing 10,000 or fewer  persons  by water
source  and size in an initial State Mon-
itoring Plan for  sach State using a ran-
dom number generator. EPA will also
generate a replacement list  of systems
for systems  that may not  have been
correctly specified on  the initial plan.
This initial State Monitoring Plan will
also indicate the year  and day, plus or
minus two (2) weeks from the day, that
each system must monitor for the con-
taminants in List 1  of Table  1  of this
section,   Unregulated  Contaminant
Monitoring Regulation (1999) List. EPA
will provide you with the initial moni-
toring plan for your State or Tribe, in-
cluding systems to  be Index systems
and those  systems to be part  of  the
Screening  Surveys.  Within  sixty  (60)
days of receiving your State's  initial
plan, you may notify EPA that you ei-
ther accept it as your State Monitoring
Plan or request to modify  the  initial
plan by removing- systems  that have
closed, merged or are purchasing water
from  another  system and  replacing
them with  other systems.  Any  pur-
chased water system associated with a
non-purchased water system  must be
added to the State Monitoring Plan if
the State determines that its distribu-
tion system is the location of the max-
imum  residence  time or  lowest dis-
infectant residual of the  combined dis-
tribution system. In this case, the pur-
chased water system must  monitor for
the contaminants for which the "dis-
tribution  system" is  identified  as the
point of "maximum residence time"  or
"lowest disinfectant residual," depend-
ing on  the  contaminant, and not the
community  water system selling water
to it. You must replace any systems
you removed from the initial plan with
systems from the replacement  list  in
the order  they are listed. Your request
to modify the initial plan must include
the modified plan and the  reasons for
the removal and replacement  of sys-
tems. If you believe that there are rea-
sons other than those previously listed
for removing and replacing  one or more
other systems  from  the initial plan,
you  may include those systems and
their replacement systems in your re-
quest to modify the initial plan. EPA
will  review your request  to  modify
your State's initial plan. Please note
that information about  the actual  or
potential occurrence or non-occurrence
of contaminants  at a system or a sys-
tem's vulnerability  to  contamination
is not a basis for removal from or addi-
tion to the plan.
  (ii) Determine an  alternate vulnerable
time. Within 60  days of  receiving the
initial State Monitoring Plan, you may
also determine that the most vulner-
able time of the year for any or all of
the systems in the plan,  and for any of
the large  systems that  must monitor,
is some  period  other  than May  1
through July 31.  If you  make this de-
termination, you must modify the ini-
tial plan to indicate the  alternate vul-
nerable time and to which systems the
alternate vulnerable time applies. EPA
will  review  these determinations when
you  submit  your request  to  modify
your State's initial monitoring plan to
the EPA. You  must  notify the  small
system(s) in your  final State  Moni-
toring Plan and the large system(s) of
the most vulnerable time(s) of the year
that you have specified for them  to
sample  for  one  of their  sampling
events.  You must notify them at least
90 days before  their  first  unregulated
contaminant sampling is to occur. You
                                    430

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.40
may  need to consider the  timing of
monitoring in paragraph  (b)(l)(iii) of
this section.
  (iii) Modify the timing of monitoring.
Within sixty (60) days of receiving the
initial plan,  you may also modify the
plan  by  selecting an alternative year
and day, plus or minus two  (2) weeks,
within the years specified  in column 6,
List 1 of Table 1, Unregulated Contami-
nant Monitoring Regulation (1999) List,
in paragraph  (a)(3) of this section, for
monitoring for each system in the ini-
tial plan as long as approximately one-
third of the systems in the State Plan
monitor  in each of the three (3) years
listed. This monitoring may be coordi-
nated with   regulated  contaminant
compliance monitoring at  your discre-
tion.  You must  send the modified plan
to EPA.
  (iv) Identify alternate sampling points
for small systems in the State Monitoring
Plan.  All systems are required to mon-
itor for the contaminants  at the sam-
pling locations  specified in  column 5,
List 1 of Table 1, Unregulated Contami-
nant Monitoring Regulation (1999) List,
in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, un-
less the  State  specifies an alternate
compliance sampling point as the sam-
pling location. If the compliance sam-
pling points  for the  small systems in
the State Monitoring Plan  are different
than those specified in paragraph (a)(3)
of this section, then you must indicate
these  sampling-  points  in  the plan.
These alternative   sampling  points
must  allow proper sampling and test-
ing for the unregulated contaminants.
  (v)  Notify small and large  systems of
their  monitoring  responsibilities.  You
must  provide notification to systems in
the plan and, where appropriate, the
large  systems, at least ninety (90) days
before sampling  must occur.
  (vi) Provide instructions to systems that
are part  of the  final State Monitoring
Plan.  You must  send  a  monitoring
schedule to each system listed in the
State  Monitoring  Plan and  instruc-
tions  on  location, frequency, timing of
sampling, use of sampling equipment,
and handling and shipment of samples
based on  these  regulations.  EPA will
provide you with guidance  for these in-
structions. If you perform the sampling
or make alternative arrangements for
the sampling at  the  systems  in  the
plan, you must inform EPA at least six
(6) months before the first monitoring
is to occur and address the alternative
monitoring arrangements in the MOA.
  (vii) Participate  in  monitoring  for the
Screening Surveys for small and large sys-
tems. Within 120 days prior to sampling,
EPA will notify  you  which systems
have been selected to participate in the
Screening Surveys, the sampling dates,
the  designated laboratory for  testing,
and   instructions  for  sampling. You
must review  the  small systems that
EPA selected  for the State Monitoring'
Plan to  ensure that the  systems are
not closed, merged or purchasing water
from another system (unless the sys-
tem  is to conduct monitoring' for a con-
taminant with the  sampling location
specified as "distribution system"), and
then make  any  replacements  in  the
plan, as described in paragraph (b)(l)(i)
of this section. You must notify the se-
lected systems in your State of these
Screening Surveys requirements. You
must provide  the  necessary Screening
Surveys  information  to  the selected
systems  at least ninety (90) days prior
to the sampling date.
  (viii) Participate in monitoring for Pre-
Screen Testing for small and large  sys-
tems. You can participate in Pre-Screen
Testing in two ways.
  (A) First,  within ninety (90)  days of
EPA's letter to you concerning initi-
ation of Pre-Screen Testing for specific
contaminants,  you  can identify from
five  (5) up to  twenty-five  (25) systems
in your State  that you determine to be
representative of  the most vulnerable
systems to these contaminants, modify
your State Monitoring Plan to include
these most vulnerable  systems if any
serve 10,000 or fewer persons, and notify
EPA of the  addition of these systems
to the State Plan. These systems must
be selected  from  all community  and
non-transient   noncommunity   water
systems. EPA  will use the State-identi-
fied  vulnerable systems to select up to
200 systems nationally to be monitored
considering the characteristics  of the
contaminants,  precipitation,  system
operation,  and  environmental  condi-
tions.
  (B) Second,  within 120 days prior to
sampling, EPA will notify you  which
systems  have  been selected, sampling
dates, the designated  laboratory  for
                                    431

-------
§141.40
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
testing of samples for systems serving
10,000  or fewer  persons  and approved
laboratories for systems serving more
than  10,000  persons,  and instructions
for sampling. You must notify the own-
ers or operators of the selected systems
in your State of these Pre-Screen Test-
ing requirements. At least ninety (90)
days prior to the sampling  date, you
must provide the necessary Pre-Screen
Testing information  to the owners  or
operators of the selected systems and
then inform EPA  that you  took this
action to allow sufficient time for EPA
to ensure laboratory readiness.
  (ix) Revise system's treatment plant  lo-
cation(s)  to  include   latitude  and lon-
gitude. For reporting "to the Safe Drink-
ing Water Information  System, EPA
already requires reporting of  either the
latitude and longitude or the street ad-
dress for the treatment plant location.
If the  State enters into an  MOA, the
State must report each system's treat-
ment plant  location(s) as latitude and
longitude (in addition to street ad-
dress,  if previously  reported)  by the
time of the system's reporting of As-
sessment Monitoring  results to the Na-
tional  Drinking Water Contaminant
Occurrence  Database. The State may
use the latitude and longitude of facili-
ties related  to the public water system
on the same site, or closely adjacent to
the same  site as the treatment plant,
such as the latitude  and longitude  of
the  intake  or  wellhead/field  or the
entry point  to the distribution system,
if such measurements are available.
  (2) What if I decide not to participate
in an MOA? If you decide not to enter
into an MOA with EPA to develop the
State  Monitoring Plan for  small sys-
tems, the initial monitoring plan that
EPA sent you will  become  the final
State  Monitoring Plan for your State
or Tribe.  In that case, you  may still
notify each  public water system of  its
selection for the plan and instructions
for monitoring  as long as you notify
EPA that you will be undertaking this
responsibility at least six (6)  months
prior to the first unregulated contami-
nant monitoring.
  (3) Can I add contaminants to the Un-
regulated   Contaminant  Monitoring
List? Yes, the SDWA allows  Governors
of seven  (7)  or more States to petition
the EPA Administrator to add one  or
more contaminants to the Unregulated
Contaminant  Monitoring  Regulation
(1999) List, in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section.  The  petition  must  clearly
identify  the  reason(s) for adding the
contaminant(s) to the monitoring list
in paragraph (a)(3) of this section, in-
cluding the potential risk to  public
health,  particularly  any information
that might be available regarding dis-
proportional  risks  to the health and
safety of children, the expected occur-
rence  documented by  any  available
data, any analytical methods known or
proposed to be used to test for the con-
taminant(s), and any other information
that could assist the  Administrator in
determining    which    contaminants
present the greatest public health con-
cern and should, therefore, be included
on the Unregulated Contaminant Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List, in para-
graph (a)(3) of this section.
  (4) Can I waive monitoring require-
ments?  Only with  EPA  approval and
under very limited conditions.  Condi-
tions and procedures  for obtaining the
only type  of waiver available under
these regulations are as follows:
  (i) Application.  You  may apply  to
EPA for  a State-wide waiver from the
unregulated  contaminant  monitoring
requirements for public water systems
serving more  than 10,000 persons. To
apply for such a waiver, you must sub-
mit  an application to  EPA  that in-
cludes the following information:
  (A) the list of contaminants  on the
Unregulated  Contaminant Monitoring
List for  which you request  a waiver,
and
  (B) documentation for each contami-
nant in  your  request  demonstrating
that the contaminants  have not  been
used, applied, stored, disposed  of, re-
leased, naturally present or detected in
the source waters or distribution sys-
tems in your State during the past 15
years, and that it does not occur natu-
rally in your State.
  (ii) Approval. EPA will  notify you if
EPA agrees  to  waive monitoring re-
quirements.

APPENDIX A  TO §141.40—QUALITY  CON-
    TROL REQUIREMENTS  FOR TESTING
    ALL SAMPLES COLLECTED

  Your system must ensure that the quality
control requirements listed below for testing
                                    432

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                 §141.40
of samples collected  and submitted  under
§141.40 are followed:
  (1) Sample Collection/Preservation. Follow
the sample collection and preservation re-
quirements for the specified method for each
of the contaminants in Table 1, UCMR (1999)
List,  in  paragraph (a)(3)  of  this  section.
These  requirements  specify  sample  con-
tainers, collection, dechlorination, preserva-
tion,  storage, sample holding time, and ex-
tract storage and/or holding time that the
laboratory must follow
  (2) Detection Limit  Calculate the labora-
tory detection limit for each contaminant in
Table  1,  Unregulated  Contaminant Moni-
toring Regulation (1999) List,  of paragraph
(a)(3) of this section using the  appropriate
procedure  in the specified method with the
exception  that the  contaminant concentra-
tion used  to fortify reagent water  must be
less than or equal to the minimum reporting
level  (MBL) for the contaminants as speci-
fied in column 4. Table 1, UCMR (1999)  List,
in paragraph (a)(3) of  this section. The cal-
culated detection limit is equal to the stand-
ard deviation times the Student's t value for
99% confidence level with n-1 degrees of free-
dom  (The detection limit must be less than
or equal to one-half of the MRL.)
  (3) Calibration. Follow the initial calibra-
tion requirements as specified in the method
utilized. Calibration must be  verified  ini-
tially with a low-level  standard at a con-
centration at or below the MRL for each con-
taminant.  Perform a continuing calibration
verification following every 10th sample. The
calibration verification  must be performed
by alternating low-level and mid-level  cali-
bration standards. The low-level standard is
defined  as a concentration at  or below the
MRL  with an acceptance range of ±40%. The
mid-level  standard is  in the middle of the
calibration range  with an  acceptance range
of ±20%.
  (4) Reagent Blank Analysis  Analyze one
laboratory reagent (method) blank per  sam-
ple set/batch  that is  treated  exactly  as  a
sample. The maximum allowable background
concentration is one-half of the MRL tor all
contaminants.  A field reagent  blank is re-
quired only for EPA Method 524.2 (or equiva-
lent  listed methods, D5790.95, SM6210D, and
SM6200B).
  (5) Quality Control Sample. Obtain a qual-
ity control sample from an external source
to check   laboratory performance at  least
once each quarter.
  (6) Matrix Spike  and  Duplicate.  Prepare
and analyze the sample matrix  spike (SMS)
for  accuracy  and  matrix  spike duplicate
(MSD) samples for  precision to  determine
method accuracy and precision for  all con-
taminants in Table 1, Unregulated Contami-
nant  Monitoring Regulation (1999)  List,  in
paragraph  (a)(3) of  this section.  SMS/MSD
samples must be prepared and analyzed at a
frequency  of 5%  (or one SMS/MSD set per
every 20 samples) or with each sample batch
whichever is more frequent. In addition, the
SMS/MSD spike concentrations must  be  al-
ternated between a low-level spike and mid-
level spike  approximately 50% of the time.
(For example' a set of 40 samples will require
preparation and analysis of two  SMS/MSD
sets. The first set must be  spiked at  either
the low-level or mid level, and the second set
must be spiked with the other standard,  ei-
ther the low-level or mid-level,  whichever
was not used for the initial SMS/MSD set).
The low-level SMS/MSD spike concentration
must be within ±20%  of the MRL for each
contaminant. The  mid-level SMS/MSD spike
concentration  must be within ±20% of the
mid-level calibration standard  for each con-
taminant, and should  represent,  where pos-
sible, an approximate average concentration
observed  in   previous  analyses  of  that
analyte. The spiking concentrations must be
reported in the same units of measure as the
analytical results.
  (7) Internal Standard Calibration. As ap-
propriate to a method's requirements to  be
used, test and obtain an internal standard
for the  methods for each chemical contami-
nant in Table 1, Unregulated  Contaminant
Monitoring-  Regulation (1999) List, in para-
graph (a)(3)  of this section,  a pure contami-
nant of known concentration, for calibration
and quantitation   purposes  The  methods
specify  the percent recovery or  response that
you must obtain for acceptance.
  (8) Method  Performance  Test. As appro-
priate  to a  method's requirements, test for
surrogate compounds, a pure  contaminant
unlikely to  be found in any sample,  to  be
used to monitor method performance. The
methods specify the  percent recovery that
you must obtain for acceptance.
  (9) Detection Confirmation.  Confirm any
chemical contaminant analyzed using a gas
chromatographic method and detected above
the MBL, by gas chromatographic/mass spec-
trometric (GO/MS) methods. If testing re-
sulted in first analyzing the sample extracts
via specified gas chromatographic  methods.
an initial confirmation by a second column
dissimilar to  the  primary  column  may  be
performed.  If the  contaminant detection is
confirmed by the secondary column, then the
contaminant must be reconfirmed by GC/MS
using three  (3) specified ion peaks for con-
taminant identification. Use one of the fol-
lowing  confirming techniques1  perform sin-
gle point calibration of the GC/MS system
for confirmation purposes only as long as the
calibration  standard  is at  a concentration
within  ± 50%  of  the  concentration deter-
mined by the initial analysis;  or perform a
three (3) point calibration with single point
daily calibration verification of the GC/MS
system   regardless   of   whether   that
verification  standard concentration is within
± 50% of sample response. If GC/MS analysis
confirms the initial contaminant detection,
                                         433

-------
§141.41
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
report results determined from the initial
analysis.
  (10) Reporting.  Report  the analytical re-
sults and other data, with the required data
listed in 40 CFR 141.35, Table 1. Report this
data electronically  to  EPA,  unless  EPA
specifies otherwise, and provide a copy to the
State. Systems must coordinate with their
laboratories for electronic reporting to EPA
to ensure proper formatting and timely data
submission.
  (11) Method Defined Quality Control. As
appropriate to the  method's  requirements,
perform  analysis of Laboratory  Fortified
Blanks and Laboratory Performance Checks
as specified  in the  method.  Each method
specifies acceptance  criteria for these qual-
ity control checks.
[64 FR 50612,  Sept. 17, 1999, as amended at 65
FR  11382, Mar. 2, 2000; 66 FR 2302, Jan. 11,
2001; 66 FR 27215, May 16, 2001; 66  FR 46225,
Sept. 4, 2002; 67 FR 65900, Oct. 29, 2002]

§141.41   Special  monitoring   for  so-
    dium.
  (a) Suppliers of water for  community
public water systems shall  collect and
analyze  one sample per plant at the
entry point of the distribution system
for  the  determination of sodium con-
centration levels; samples must be col-
lected and  analyzed annually  for sys-
tems utilizing surface  water sources in
whole or in part,  and at  least every
three years for systems utilizing solely
ground  water  sources. The minimum
number of samples required to be taken
by  the  system  shall  be based on the
number  of  treatment plants  used by
the system, except that  multiple wells
drawing raw water from a single aqui-
fer  may, with the State approval, be
considered one treatment plant for de-
termining  the  minimum   number of
samples. The supplier  of water may be
required  by the  State to   collect and
analyze water samples for sodium more
frequently  in locations  where the so-
dium content is variable.
  (b) The supplier  of water shall report
to EPA and/or the State the results of
the  analyses for  sodium   within the
first 10 days of the month following the
month  in  which  the sample  results
were  received or  within  the  first 10
days following the end of the  required
monitoring period as stipulated by the
State, whichever  of  these  is  first.  If
more than annual sampling is  required
the  supplier shall  report  the  average
sodium concentration within 10 days of
the  month  following the  month  in
which the analytical results of the last
sample used for the annual average was
received.  The  supplier  of water  shall
not be required to  report the results to
EPA where the State has adopted this
regulation and  results are reported to
the State. The supplier shall report the
results to EPA where the State has not
adopted this regulation.
  (c) The supplier of water shall notify
appropriate  local   and  State  public
health officials of the sodium levels by
written notice  by direct mail  within
three months. A copy of each notice re-
quired to be provided by this paragraph
shall  be sent to EPA and/or  the State
within 10 days of its issuance. The sup-
plier of water is not required to notify
appropriate  local   and  State  public
health officials of the sodium  levels
where the  State provides such notices
in lieu of the supplier.
  (d) Analyses for sodium shall be con-
ducted as directed in §141.23(k)(l).

[45 FR 57345, Aug. 27, 1980, as amended at 59
FR 62470, Dec. 5, 1994]

§141.42 Special    monitoring    for
    corrosivity characteristics.
  (a)-(c) [Reserved]
  (d) Community water supply systems
shall  identify  whether the  following
construction materials  are  present in
their distribution system and report to
the State:

Lead from piping, solder, caulking, interior
  lining  of  distribution mains,  alloys and
  home plumbing.
Copper from piping and alloys, service lines,
  and home plumbing.
Galvanized piping, service lines,  and home
  plumbing.
Ferrous piping materials such as cast iron
  and steel.
Asbestos cement pipe.

In addition, States may require identi-
fication and reporting of other  mate-
rials  of construction  present in dis-
tribution  systems  that may contribute
contaminants  to  the drinking water,
such as:
Vinyl lined asbestos cement pipe
Coal tar lined pipes and tanks.
[45 FR 57346, Aug. 27, 1980; 47 FR 10999, Mar.
12, 1982, as amended  at 59 FR 62470, Dec. 5,
1994]
                                      434

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.50
§ 141.43 Prohibition  on  use  of  lead
    pipes, solder, and flux.
  (a)  In general—(1) Prohibition.  Any
pipe, solder, or flux, which is used after
June 19, 1986, in the installation or re-
pair of—
  (i) Any public water system, or
  (ii) Any plumbing in a residential or
nonresidential  facility providing- water
for human consumption which is con-
nected to a public  water system shall
be lead free as defined by paragraph (d)
of this section. This paragraph (a)(l)
shall  not apply to  leaded joints  nec-
essary for the repair of cast iron pipes.
  (2) [Reserved]
  (b) State enforcement—(1) Enforcement
of  prohibition.   The  requirements  of
paragraph (a)(l) of this section shall be
enforced in all States effective June 19,
1988. States shall enforce such require-
ments through State or local plumbing
codes,  or  such  other means of enforce-
ment as the State may determine to be
appropriate.
  (2) [Reserved]
  (c) Penalties. If the Administrator de-
termines that a State is not enforcing
the requirements  of paragraph (a) of
this section, as required  pursuant to
paragraph (b) of this section, the  Ad-
ministrator may withhold up to 5 per-
cent of Federal funds available to that
State for State program grants under
section 1443(a) of the Act.
  (d) Definition  of  lead free.  For  pur-
poses of  this section,  the term  lead
free:
  (1) When used with respect to solders
and flux refers to solders and flux con-
taining not more than 0.2 percent lead;
  (2) When used with respect  to pipes
and pipe  fittings  refers to  pipes and
pipe fittings containing not more than
8.0 percent lead; and
  (3) When used with respect to plumb-
ing fittings and fixtures  intended by
the manufacturer to dispense water for
human ingestion refers to fittings and
fixtures that  are  in compliance with
standards  established  in  accordance
with 42 U.S.C. 300g-6(e).
[52 FR 20674, June 2, 1987, as amended at 65
PR 2003, Jan. 12, 2000]
Subpart   F—Maximum   Contami-
     nant  Level  Goals  and Max-
     imum   Residual   Disinfectant
     Level Goals

§ 141.50 Maximum contaminant  level
    goals for organic contaminants.
  (a) MCLG-s are zero for the following
contaminants:
  (1) Benzene
  (2) Vinyl chloride
  (3) Carbon tetrachloride
  (4) 1,2-dichloroethane
  (5) Trichloroethylene
  (6) Acrylamide
  (7) Alachlor
  (8) Chlordane
  (9) Dibromochloropropane
  (10) 1,2-Dichloropropane
  (11) Epichlorohydrin
  (12) Ethylene dibromide
  (13) Heptachlor
  (14) Heptachlor epoxide
  (15) Pentachlorophenol
  (16)    Polychlorinated    biphenyls
(PCBs)
  (17) Tetrachloroethylene
  (18) Toxaphene
  (19) Benzo[a]pyrene
  (20)   Dichloromethane   (methylene
chloride)
  (21) Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
  (22) Hexachlorobenzene
  (23) 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin)
  (b) MCLGs for the following contami-
nants are as indicated:
Contaminant
(1) 1,1-Dichloroethylene
(2) 1,1,1-Tnchloroethane
(3) para-Dichlorobenzene
(4) Aldicarb
(5) Aldicarb sulfoxide
(6) Aldicarb sulfone
(7) Atrazine
(8) Carbofuran
(9) o-Dichlorobenzene
(10) cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene .
(11) trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
(12)2,4-D
(13) Ethylbenzene
(14) Lindane ,
(15) Methoxychlor
(16) Monochlorobenzene
(17) Styrene .
(18) Toluene
(19)2,4,5-TP
(20) Xylenes (total)
(21) Dalapon
(22) Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate .
(23) Dinoseb
(24) Diquat
(25) Endothall
MCLG in
mg/l
0007
020
0075
0001
0001
0001
0003
004
06
007
01
007
07
00002
004
01
01
1
005
10
02
4
007
02
1
                                     435

-------
§141.51
          40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant
(26) Endnn
(27) Glyphosate
(28) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
(29) Oxamyl (Vydate)
(30) Picloram
(31) Simazine
(32) 1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
(33) 1,1,2-Tnchloroethane
MCLG in
mg/t
002
7
05
2
5
004
.07
003
[50 FR 46901, Nov. 13, 1985, as amended at 52
FR  20674, June 2, 1987; 52 FR 25716, July 8,
1987; 56 FR 3592, Jan. 30, 1991; 56 FR 30280,
July 1, 1991; 57 FR 31846, July 17, 1992]

§ 141.51  Maximum  contaminant  level
    goals for inorganic contaminants.

  (a) [Reserved]
  (b) MCLGs for the following1 contami-
nants are as indicated:
Contaminant
Antimony .
Arsenic
Asbestos

Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide (as free Cyanide) .
Fluoride
Lead
Mercury
Nitrate
Nitnte
Total Nitrate+Nitnte
Selenium .
Thallium ,
MCLG (mg/l)
0006
zero1
7 Million fibers/liter
(longer than 10 ^im)
2
004
0005
0 1
1 3
2
40
zero
0002
10 (as Nitrogen)
1 (as Nitrogen)
10 (as Nitrogen)
L005
0005
  'This value for arsenic is effective January 23, 2006 Until
then, there is no MCLG

[50 FR 47155, Nov. 14, 1985, as amended at 52
FR 20674,  June 2, 1987; 56 FR 3593, Jan. 30,
1991; 56 FR 26548, June 7,  1991; 56  FR 30280,
July 1, 1991: 57 FR 31846, July 17, 1992: 60 FR
33932, June 29,  1995; 66 FR 7063, Jan. 22, 2001]

§ 141.52  Maximum  contaminant  level
    goals for  microbiological contami-
    nants.

  MCLGs  for the following contami-
nants are as indicated:
Contaminant
(1) Giardta lamblta . .
(2) Viruses
(3) Legionella
(4) Total coliforms (including fecal coliforms
and Eschenchia coll)
(5) Cryptospondium , . .
MCLG
zero
zero
zero
zero
zero
                                           § 141.53  Maximum  contaminant  level
                                              goals for disinfection byproducts.
                                            MCLGs for the following disinfection
                                           byproducts are as indicated:
Disinfection byproduct
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform 	
Bromate
Dichloroacetic acid
Tnchloroacetic acid
Chlorite .
Dibromochloromethane
MCLG
(mg/L)
Zero
Zero
Zero
Zero
03
08
0.06
[63 FR 69465, Dec. 16, 1998, as amended at 65
FR 34405, May 30, 2000]

§ 141.54  Maximum  residual disinfect-
    ant level goals for disinfectants.

  MRDLG-s for disinfectants are as fol-
lows:
Disinfectant residual
Chlorine . .
Chloramines . .
Chlorine dioxide
MRDLG(mg/L)
4 (as Cl 2)
4 (as Ch)
0 8 (as CIO;)
                                           [63 FR 69465. Dec. 16, 1998]

                                           § 141.55  Maximum  contaminant  level
                                              goals for radionuclides.
                                             MCLGs for radionuclides are as indi-
                                           cated in the following table:
                                                       Contaminant
1 Combined radium-226 and radium-228
2 Gross alpha particle activity (excluding radon
  and uranium)
3 Beta particle and photon radioactivity
4 Uranium
                                                                             MCLG
Zero
Zero
Zero
Zero
[54 FR 27527, 27566, June 29, 1989; 55 FR 25064,
June 19, 1990; 63 FR 69515, Dec. 16, 1998]
[65 FR 76748, Dec. 7, 2000]

Subpart    G—National    Primary
     Drinking   Water   Regulations:
     Maximum Contaminant Levels
     and  Maximum  Residual  Dis-
     infectant Levels

§ 141.60  Effective dates.
  (a) The effective dates for §141.61 are
as follows:
  (1) The effective date for paragraphs
(a)(l) through Ca)(8) of §141.61 is Janu-
ary 9, 1989.
  (2) The effective date for paragraphs
(a)(9) through (a)(18) and (c)(l) through
(c)(18) of §141.61 is July 30, 1992.
                                        436

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.61
  (3) The effective date for paragraphs
(a)(19) through (a)(21),  (c)(19) through
(c)(25),  and  (c)(27)  through  (c)(33)  of
§141.61 is January 17, 1994. The effective
date of §141.61(c)(26)  is August 17, 1992.
  (b) The effective dates for §141.62 are
as follows:
  (1) The effective  date of paragraph
(b)(l) of §141.62 is October 2, 1987.
  (2) The effective date for paragraphs
(b)(2)  and  (b)(4)  through  (b)(10)  of
§141.62 is July 30, 1992.
  (3) The effective date for paragraphs
(b)(ll) through (b)(15) of §141.62 is Janu-
ary 17, 1994.
  (4) The effective date for §141.62(b)(16)
is January 23, 2006.

[56 FR 3593, Jan. 30, 1991, as amended at 57
PR 31846, July 17, 1992; 59 FR  34324, July 1,
1994; 66FR 7063, Jan. 22, 2001]

§ 141.61  Maximum contaminant  levels
   for organic contaminants.

  (a) The following maximum contami-
nant  levels for organic  contaminants
apply to community and non-transient,
non-community water systems.
CAS No
(1) 75-01-4
(2) 71-43-2
(3) 56-23-5
(4) 107-06-2
(5) 79-01-6 . .
(6) 106-46-7
(7) 75-35-4 .... . .
(8) 71-55-6
(9) 156-59-2
(10) 78-87-5
(11) 100^t1^t
(12) 108-90-7 	
(13) 95-50-1
(14) 100^t2-S
(15) 127-18-^t
(16) 108-88-3 .
(17) 156-60-5
(18) 1330-20-7
(19) 75-09-2
(20) 120-82-1
(21) 79-00-5
Contaminant
Vinyl chloride
Benzene
Carbon tetrachlonde
1 ,2-Dichloroethane 	
Trichloroethylene
para-Dichlorobenzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1 ,1 ,1-Tnchloroethane
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
1 ,2-Dich!oropropane
Ethylbenzene
Monochlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Xylenes (total)
Dichloromethane
1,2,4-Tnchloro- benzene
1,1,2-Tnchloro- ethane
MCL (mg/l)
0002
0005
0005
0.005
0005
0075
0007
02
007
0005
07
0 1
06
01
0005
1
01
10
0005
07
005
  (b)  The Administrator, pursuant  to
section 1412 of the Act, hereby identi-
fies  as indicated in the  Table below
granular   activated  carbon  (GAG),
packed tower aeration (PTA), or oxida-
tion (OX) as the best technology treat-
ment technique,  or other means avail-
able for achieving compliance with the
maximum  contaminant  level  for or-
ganic contaminants identified in para-
graphs (a) and (c) of this section:
             BAT FOR ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS LISTED IN § 141.61 (a) AND (c)
CAS No
15972-60-8
116-06-3
1646-88-4
1646-87-3
1912-24-9
71-43-2 .
50-32-8
1563-66-2 . .
56-23-5
57-74-9
75-99-0
94-75-7
103-23-1
117-81-7
96-12-8
95-50-1
106^t6-7
Contaminant
Alachlor . .
Aldioarb
Aldicarb sulfone
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Airazine 	
Benzene
Benzo[a]pyrene
Carbofuran
Carbon tetrachlonde
Chlordane 	
Dalapon
2,4-Q
Di (2-ethylhexyl) adipate
Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) ,
o-Dichlorobenzene
para-Dichlorobenzene
' GAC~
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PTA





X


X



X

X
X
X
ox

















                                     437

-------
§141.61
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
        BAT FOR ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS LISTED IN §141.61 (a) AND (c)—Continued
CAS No
107-06-2
75-35-4
1 56-59-2
156-60-5 .
75-09-2
78-87-5
88-85-7
85-00-7
145-73-3
72-20-8
100—41-4
106-93-4
1071-83-6
76-44-8
1024-57-3
118-74-1
77-47-3
58-89-9 ,
72-43-5
108-90-7
23135-22-0
87-86-5
1918-02-1
1336-36-3 	
122-34-9
100-42-5
1746-01-6
127-18-4
108-88-3
8001-35-2
93-72-1
120-82-1
71-55-6
79-00-5
79-01-6 .
75-01-4 .
1330-20-7
Contaminant
1 ,2-DicNoroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
cis-1 ,2-Dtchloroethylene
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Dinoseb
Diquat
Endothall
Endrin
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)
Gylphosate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Lmdane
Methoxychlor
Monochlorobenzene
Oxamyl (Vydate)
Pentachlorophenol
Picloram
Polychlonnated biphenyls (PCS) 	
Simazine
Styrsne
2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin)
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene 	
Toxaphene
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloro9thane
1 ,1 ,2-Tnchloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Xylene
GAC
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
Y

X
X
X
X
V
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X

x
PTA
X
X
X
X
X
x




X
X




X


X





X

X
X


X
X
X
X
X
X
ox












X
























  (c) The following maximum contami-
nant levels for synthetic  organic con-
taminants apply  to community water
systems  and non-transient, non-com-
munity water systems:
CAS No
(1) 15972-60-8
(2)116-06-3
(3) 1646-87-3
(4) 1646-87-4 . .
(5) 1912-24-9 . .
(6) 1563-66-2
(7) 57-74-9
(8) 96-12-8 . .
(9) 94-75-7
(10) 106-93-4
(11) 76-44-8
(12) 1024-57-3
(13) 58-89-9 .... ...
(14) 72-43-5
(15) 1336-36-3
(16) 87-86-5 . . .
(17) 8001-35-2 ....
(18) 93-72-1
(19) 50-32-8 . .
(20) 75-99-0 . 	
(21) 103-23-1
(22) 117-81-7 . 	
(23) 88-85-7
(24) 85-00-7
(25\ 145-73-3 	
Contaminant

Aldicarb . . ...
Aldicarb sulfoxide
Aldicarb sulfone
Atrazine
Carbofuran
Chlordane ...
Dibromochloropropane
2,4-D . .
Heptachlor . . ,.
Heptachlor epoxide
Lmdane
Methoxychlor
Polychlonnated biphenyls 	
Pentachlorophenol
Toxaphene . . ....
2,4,5-TP . . .
Benzo[a]pyrene . ...
Dalapon . . .
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate . .
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Dinoseb
Diquat . . . ....
Endothall
MCL (mg/l)
0002
0003
0004
0002
0003
004
0002
00002
007
0.00005
00004
00002
00002
004
00005
0001
0003
005
00002
02
04
0006
0.007
002
01
                                    438

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                      §141.62
CAS No
(26) 72-20-8 . .
(27) 1071-53-6 . .
(28) 118-74-1
(29) 77-47-4 . .
(30) 23135-22-0 . .
(31) 1918-02-1
(32) 122-34-9
(33) 1746-01-6 . .
Contaminant
Endrm
Glyphosate .
Hexacholorbenzene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Oxamyl (Vydate)
Picloram
Simazme
23,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin)
MCL (mg/l)
0002
07
0001
005
02
05
0004
3x10-8
[56 FR 3593, Jan. 30, 1991. as amended at 56 FR 30280. July 1. 1991; 57 FR 31846, July 17. 1992.
59 FR 34324, July 1. 1994]
§141.62  Maximum  contaminant  levels
    for inorganic contaminants.
  (a) [Reserved]
  (b) The maximum contaminant levels
for inorganic contaminants specified in
paragraphs  (b)  (2)-(6),  (b)(10),  and  (b)
(11)-(16) of this section apply to  com-
munity  water systems and  non-tran-
sient, non-community  water  systems.
The maximum contaminant level  spec-
ified in paragraph (b)d) of this section
only applies to community water sys-
tems. The maximum contaminant lev-
els specified in (b)(7), (b)(8).  and  (b)(9)
of  this  section  apply  to  community
water  systems;  non-transient,   non-
community water systems; and  tran-
sient non-community water systems.
                        BAT FOR INORGANIC COMPOUNDS LISTED IN
                                  SECTION 141.62(b)
(1) Fluoride
(2) Asbestos

(3) Barium
(4) Cadmium
(5) Chromium
(6) Mercury
(7) Nitrate
(8) Nitrite
(9) Total Nitrate and Nitrite
(10) Selenium
(11) Antimony
(12) Beryllium
(13) Cyanide (as free Cya-
  nide)
(14) [Reserved]
(15) Thallium
(16) Arsenic
                           MCL (mg/l)
40
7 Million Fibers/liter (longer
 than 10 pm)
2
0005
0 1
0002
10 (as Nitrogen)
1 (as Nitrogen)
10 (as Nitrogen)
005
0006
0004
02
0002
0010
  (c)  The Administrator,  pursuant to
section 1412 of the Act,  hereby  identi-
fies  the  following  as the best tech-
nology, treatment technique,  or other
means available  for  achieving compli-
ance  with the maximum contaminant
levels for inorganic contaminants iden-
tified in  paragraph  (b) of this section,
except fluoride:
Chemical Name
Antimony
Arsenic4

Asbestos
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cyanide
Mercury
Nickel
Nitrate
Nitrite
Selenium
Thallium
BAT(s)
2,7
1 2, 5. 6. 7, 9,
121-
2,3,8
5,6,7,9
1,2,567
2,5,6,7
2.5,62,7
5,7,10
2',4,61,71
5,6,7
5,7,9
5,7
1,23,6,7,9
1,5
  1 BAT only if influent Hg concentrations <10|jg/1
  2 BAT for Chromium Ml only
  3 BAT for Selenium IV only
  4BATs for Arsenic V Pre-oxidation may be required to con-
vert Arsenic III to Arsenic V
  5 To obtain high removals, iron to arsenic ratio must be at
least 20 1

          Key  to  BATS in Table

l=Activated Alumina
2 = Coagulation/Filtration (not BAT for sys-
  tems < 500 service connections)
2=Coagulation/Filtration
3=Direct and Dlatomlte Filtration
4=Granular Activated Carbon
5=Ion Exchange
6 = Lime Softening (not BAT for systems
  < 500 service connections)
7=Reverse Osmosis
8=Corrosion Control
9=Electrodialysis
10=Chlorme
ll=Ultraviolet
12 = Oxidation/Filtration
  (d)  The   Administrator,  pursuant to
section 1412 of the Act,  hereby  identi-
fies in  the  following table the  afford-
able technology, treatment technique.
or  other means available to  systems
serving  10,000  persons  or  fewer  for
achieving   compliance with  the max-
imum contaminant level for arsenic:
                                        439
      203-160  D-15

-------
§141.63
                                  40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  SMALL SYSTEM COMPLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES
          (SSCTs)1 FOR ARSENIC 2
  Small system compliance
      technology
Activated Alumina (central-
  ized)
Activated Alumina (Pomt-of-
  Use)4
Coagulation/Filtration 5
Coagulation-assisted Micro-
  filtration
Electrodialysis reversal6
Enhanced coagulation/filtra-
  tion
Enhanced lime softening
  (pH>105)
Ion Exchange
Lime Softening 5
Oxidation/Filtration 7
Reverse Osmosis (central-
  ized)6
Reverse Osmosis (Pomt-of-
  Use)4
 Affordable for listed small
   system categories 3
Alt size categories

All size categories

501-3,300, 3,301-10,000
501-3,300,3,301-10,000

501-3,300,3,301-10,000
All size categories

All size categories

All size categories
501-3,300,3,301-10,000
All size categories
501-3,300, 3,301-10,000

All size categories
  1 Section 1412(b)(4)(E)(u) of SDWA specifies that SSCTs
must be affordable and technically feasible for small systems
  2 SSCTs for Arsenic V  Pre-oxidation may be required to
convert Arsenic (II to Arsenic V
  3 The Act (ibid ) specifies three categories of small systems'
(i) those serving 25 or more, but fewer than 501,  (n) those
serving more than 500, but fewer than 3,301, and (m) those
serving more than 3,300, but fewer than 10,001
  4 When POU or POE devices are used for compliance, pro-
grams to ensure proper long-term operation,  maintenance.
and monitoring must be provided by the water system to en-
sure adequate performance
  5Unlikely to be installed solely for arsenic removal May re-
quire pH adjustment to optimal range if high  removals are
needed
  6 Technologies reject a large volume of water—may not be
appropriate for areas where water quantity may be an issue
  ''To obtain high removals, iron to arsenic ratio must be at
least 20 1

[56 FR 3594, Jan. 30, 1991, as amended at 56
FR 30280, July 1, 1991; 57 FR 31847, July 17,
1992; 59 FR 34325, July 1, 1994; 60  FR 33932,
June 29, 1995; 66  FR 7063, Jan. 22, 2001; 68 FR
14506, Mar. 25, 2003]

  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38855, June
29, 2004, §141.62(c) was  amended in  the Table
"BAT FOR INORGANIC COMPOUNDS LIST-
ED IN SECTION 141.62(b)" in the  entry for
"cyanide" by replacing the "10" with "13"; and
in the list "Key to BATS in Table", by adding
to  the  end of the  list,   "13  =  Alkaline
Chlorination (pH >  8.5)", effective July 29,
2004.

§ 141.63   Maximum  contaminant  levels
    (MCLs) for microbiological  contami-
    nants.

  (a) The MCL is based on the  presence
or absence of total coliforms in a sam-
ple, rather than coliform density.
  (1) For a  system  which  collects at
least 40 samples per month,  if no more
than 5.0  percent of the samples  col-
lected  during  a  month  are  total coli-
form-positive,  the system is in compli-
ance with the  MCL  for total coliforms.
  (2) For a system which collects fewer
than 40 samples/month, if no more than
one sample collected during a month is
total coliform-positive, the system  is
in compliance with the MCL for total
coliforms.
  (b) Any fecal coliform-positive repeat
sample or  E. coZz-positive  repeat  sam-
ple,  or any total coliform-positive re-
peat sample  following a fecal coliform-
positive or E. coH-positive routine sam-
ple constitutes a violation of the MCL
for total coliforms. For purposes of the
public  notification  requirements   in
subpart Q, this is a violation that may
pose an acute risk to health.
  (c) A public water system must deter-
mine  compliance  with  the  MCL for
total coliforms  in  paragraphs  (a) and
(b) of this section for each month  in
which  it is   required  to  monitor for
total coliforms.
  (d) The  Administrator,  pursuant  to
section 1412  of the Act, hereby identi-
fies  the  following  as the  best  tech-
nology, treatment  techniques, or other
means  available for  achieving  compli-
ance with the  maximum contaminant
level for total coliforms in paragraphs
(a) and (b)  of this section:
  (1) Protection of  wells from contami-
nation  by   coliforms  by  appropriate
placement and construction;
  (2) Maintenance of a disinfectant re-
sidual throughout the distribution sys-
tem;
  (3) Proper  maintenance  of the  dis-
tribution system including appropriate
pipe  replacement  and  repair  proce-
dures, main  flushing programs, proper
operation and maintenance of storage
tanks  and  reservoirs,  and  continual
maintenance of positive water pressure
in all parts of the  distribution system;
  (4) Filtration and/or disinfection  of
surface  water,  as described  in  subpart
H,   or  disinfection  of  ground  water
using strong  oxidants such as chlorine,
chlorine  dioxide, or ozone;  and
  (5) For systems using  ground water,
compliance  with the  requirements  o
an BPA-approved State  Wellhead Pro-
tection  Program developed and imple-
mented  under  section   1428  of  the
SDWA.

[54 FR 27566, June 29, 1989; 55 FR 25064, June
19, 1990, as amended  at 65 FR 26022,  May 4
2000]
                                         440

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                               §141.66
§141.64  Maximum  contaminant levels
    for disinfection byproducts.
  (a) The maximum contaminant levels
(MCLs) for disinfection byproducts are
as follows:
                                [63 FR 69465, Dec. 16, 1998, as amended at 66
                                FR 3776. Jan 16, 2001]

                                § 141.65  Maximum  residual  disinfect-
                                    ant levels.
                                  (a)  Maximum residual  disinfectant
Disinfection byproduct
Total tnhalomethanes (TTHM)
Haloacetjc acids (five) (HAAS) 	
Bromate ,
Chlorite
MCL
(mg/L)
0080
0.060
0010
1 0
levels (MKLJJUS) are as loiiows:
Disinfectant residual
Chlorine
CMorammes
Chlorine dioxide
MRDL (mg/L)
4 0 (as Cy
4 0 (as Cy
0 8 (as CI02)

  (b)  Compliance  dates.  (1) CWSs  and
NTNCWSs. Subpart H  systems serving
10,000  or more persons must comply
with this section beginning January 1,
2002. Subpart H systems serving fewer
than 10,000 persons and systems using
only ground water not under the direct
influence of surface water must comply
with this section beginning January 1,
2004.
  (2) A system that is installing G-AC
or  membrane technology  to comply
with  this section  may apply  to  the
State  for an extension  of up  to  24
months  past the dates  in  paragraphs
(b)(l) of this section,  but not beyond
December 31, 2003, In granting the ex-
tension, States must set a schedule for
compliance  and may  specify  any in-
terim measures that the system must
take. Failure to meet the schedule  or
interim  treatment requirements con-
stitutes a violation of a National Pri-
mary Drinking Water Regulation.
  (c) The  Administrator, pursuant  to
Section 1412 of the Act, hereby identi-
fies the  following  as  the  best tech-
nology, treatment techniques, or other
means available for achieving compli-
ance with the maximum contaminant
levels for disinfection byproducts iden-
tified in paragraph (a) of this section:
Disinfection
 byproduct
TTHM


HAAS


Bromate

Chlorite ,
       Best available technology
Enhanced coagulation or enhanced softening
 or GAC10, with chlorine as the primary and
 residual disinfectant
Enhanced coagulation or enhanced softening
 or GAC10, with chlorine as the primary and
 residual disinfectant
Control of ozone treatment process to reduce
 production of bromate
Control of treatment processes to reduce dis-
 infectant demand and control of disinfection
 treatment processes to reduce disinfectant
 levels
  (b)  Compliance  dates.  (1) CWSs  and
NTNCWSs. Subpart H  systems serving
10,000  or more persons must comply
with this section beginning January 1,
2002. Subpart H systems serving fewer
than 10,000 persons and systems using
only ground water not under the direct
influence of surface water must comply
with this subpart beginning January 1,
2004.
  (2) Transient NCWSs. Subpart H  sys-
tems serving 10,000 or more persons and
using chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant
or oxidant must comply with the chlo-
rine dioxide MRDL beginning January
1,  2002.  Subpart  H  systems serving
fewer  than  10,000  persons and  using
chlorine dioxide  as a  disinfectant or
oxidant and  systems using only ground
water not under the direct influence of
surface water  and using chlorine diox-
ide as a disinfectant or oxidant must
comply  with  the  chlorine  dioxide
MRDL beginning- January 1, 2004.
  (c) The  Administrator, pursuant to
Section 1412 of the Act, hereby identi-
fies  the following as  the  best  tech-
nology, treatment techniques, or other
means available for achieving compli-
ance with the maximum residual  dis-
infectant levels identified in paragraph
(a) of this section: control of treatment
processes  to  reduce  disinfectant   de-
mand and control of disinfection treat-
ment processes to  reduce  disinfectant
levels.
[63 FR 69465, Deo. 16, 1998, as amended at 66
FR 3776, Jan. 16, 2001]

§ 141.66  Maximum  contaminant  levels
   for radionuclides.
  (a) [Reserved]
  (b) MCL for  combined radium-226  and
-228. The maximum contaminant level
for  combined  radium-226 and radium-
228 is 5 pCi/L. The combined radium-226
and radiurn-228 value is determined by
                                      441

-------
§141.66

the addition of the results of the anal-
ysis for radium-226 and the analysis for
radium-228.
  (c) MCL for gross alpha particle activ-
ity  (excluding radon and uranium).  The
maximum  contaminant level for gross
alpha  particle activity (including1 ra-
dium-226 but excluding radon and ura-
nium) is 15 pCi/L.
  (d) MCL for  beta particle and photon
radioactivity.  (1)  The average  annual
concentration of beta particle and pho-
ton   radioactivity   from   man-made
radionuclides in drinking  water must
not produce an annual dose equivalent
to the total body  or any internal organ
greater than 4  millirem/year  (mrem/
year).
  (2) Except for the radionuclides listed
in table A, the concentration  of man-
made  radionuclides  causing 4  mrem
total body  or organ  dose equivalents
must be calculated on  the  basis of 2
liter  per day drinking  water  intake
using the 168 hour data list in "Max-
imum  Permissible Body  Burdens  and
Maximum  Permissible Concentrations
of Radionuclides  in Air and in Water
for Occupational  Exposure,"  NBS (Na-
tional Bureau of  Standards)  Handbook
69 as  amended August 1963,  U.S.  De-
partment of Commerce.  This incorpo-
ration  by  reference  was  approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with  5 U.S.C.  552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. Copies of this  document
are available from the National Tech-
nical Information Service, NTIS ADA
280 282, U.S. Department of Commerce,
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Vir-
ginia 22161. The toll-free number is 800-
553-6847. Copies  may be  inspected at
EPA's Drinking Water  Docket, 401 M
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460; or
at the  National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For informa-
tion on the availability of this mate-
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)

rial at NARA,  call 202-741-6030, or go
to:             http://www.archives.gov/
federal	register/
code	of_federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.  If  two  or  more
radionuclides are present, the  sum  of
their annual dose  equivalent  to  the
total body or to any organ shall not ex-
ceed 4 mrem/year.

TABLE A—AVERAGE ANNUAL CONCENTRATIONS
  ASSUMED To PRODUCE: A TOTAL  BODY OR
  ORGAN DOSE OF 4 MREM/YR
1 Radionuclide
2 Tritium
3 Strontium-90
Critical organ
Total body
Bone Marrow
pCi per liter
20,000
  (e)  MCL for uranium. The maximum
contaminant level for uranium is 30 |ig/
L.
  (f)  Compliance dates.  (1) Compliance
dates for combined radium-226 and -228,
gross  alpha  particle   activity,  gross
beta particle  and photon radioactivity,
and uranium: Community water  sys-
tems must comply with the MCLs list-
ed in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (ej of
this section beginning  December 8, 2003
and compliance  shall be determined in
accordance with the  requirements  of
§§141.25 and 141.26. Compliance with re-
porting  requirements  for  the radio-
nuclides under appendix A to subpart O
and appendices A and B to subpart Q is
required on December 8, 2003.
  (2) [Reserved]
  (g) Best  available technologies (BATs)
for  radionuclides.  The  Administrator,
pursuant  to  section  1412  of the Act,
hereby identifies  as  indicated in the
following  table  the  best  technology
available  for   achieving   compliance
with the maximum contaminant levels
for combined radium-226 and -228,  ura-
nium, gross alpha particle activity, and
beta particle  and photon radioactivity.
 TABLE B—BAT FOR COMBINED RADiUM-226 AND RADiuM-228, URANIUM, GROSS ALPHA PARTICLE
                 ACTIVITY, AND BETA PARTICLE AND PHOTON RADIOACTIVITY
                Contaminant
                                                           BAT
1 Combined radium-226 and radium-228
2 Uranium

3 Gross alpha particle activity (excluding Radon and Uranium)
4 Beta particle and photon radioactivity
Ion exchange, reverse osmosis, lime softening
Ion exchange, reverse osmosis, lime softening, coagulation/fil-
 tration
Reverse osmosis.
Ion exchange, reverse osmosis
  (h) Small systems compliance technologies list for radionuclides.
                                      442

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                      §141.70
     TABLE C—LIST OF SMALL SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES FOR RADIONUCLIDES AND
                                        LIMITATIONS TO USE
Unit technologies
1 Ion exchange (IE)
2 Point of use (POU2) IE
3 Reverse osmosis (RO)

4 POU2 HO

5 Lime softening
6 Green sand filtration
7 Co-precipitation with Barium sulfate

8 Electrodialysis/electrodialysis rever-
sal
9 Pre-formed hydrous Manganese
oxide filtration
10. Activated alumina


1 1 Enhanced coagulation/filtration

Limitations
(see foot-
notes}
W
(")
W

(")

(")
(=)
0)



w

('), (h)


(')

Operator skill level required 1
Intermediate
Basic
Advanced

Basic

Advanced
Basic
Intermediate to Advanced

Basic to Intermediate

Intermediate

Advanced


Advanced

Raw water quality range and
considerations 1
All ground waters
All ground waters
Surface waters usually require pre-
filtration
Surface waters usually require pre-
filtration
All waters

Ground waters with suitable water
quality
All ground waters

All ground waters

All ground waters, competing
anion concentrations may affect
regeneration frequency
Can treat a wide range of water
qualities
  1 National Research Council (NRC)  Safe Water from Every Tap Improving Water Service to Small Communities  National
Academy Press Washington, D C 1997
  2 A POL), or "point-of-use" technology is a treatment device installed at a single tap used for the purpose of reducing contami-
nants in drinking water at that one tap POU devices are typically installed at the kitchen tap See the April 21, 2000 NODA for
more details
    Limitations Footnotes Technologies for Radionuclides
  JThe regeneration solution contains high concentrations of the contaminant ions Disposal options should be carefully consid-
ered before choosing this technology
  hWhen POU devices are used for compliance, programs for long-term  operation, maintenance, and  monitoring must be pro-
vided by water utility to ensure proper performance
  c Reject water disposal options should be carefully considered before choosing this technology See  other RO limitations de-
scribed in the SWTR Compliance Technologies Table
  dThe combination of variable source water quality and the  complexity  of the water chemistry involved may make this tech-
nology too complex for small surface water systems
  c Removal efficiencies can vary depending on water quality
  This technology may be very limited in application to smaJI systems Since the process requires static mixing, detention ba-
sins, and filtration, it is most applicable to systems with sufficiently high sulfate levels that already have  a suitable filtration treat-
ment train in place
  sThis technology is most applicable to small systems that already have filtration in  place
  h Handling of chemicals required during regeneration and pH adjustment may be too difficult for small  systems without an ade-
quately trained operator
  1 Assumes modification to a coagulation/filtration process already in place


 TABLE D—COMPLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES BY SYSTEM SIZE CATEGORY FOR RADIONUCLIDE NPDWR's
Contaminant
1 Combined radium-226 and radium-228
2 Gross alpha particle activity
3 Beta particle activity and photon activity
4 Uranium
Compliance technologies 1 for system size categories
(populat'on served)
25-500
1, 2,3,4, 5, 6, 7,8, 9
3, 4
1,2,3,4
1, 2, 4, 10, 11
501-3,300
1, 2, 3, 4 5 6, 7, 8, 9
3, 4
1,2,3,4
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11
3,300-10,000
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 8, 9
3, 4
1, 2, 3, 4
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11
  Note: ' Numbers correspond to those technologies found listed in the table C of 141 66(h)


[65 PR 76748, Dec. 7, 2000]
       Subpart H—Filtration  and
                Disinfection
  SOURCE: 54  FB 27527.  June 29,  1989, unless
otherwise noted.
§ 141.70  General requirements.

  (a)  The requirements  of this subpart
H constitute national primary drinking
water  regulations.  These  regulations
establish criteria  under  which filtra-
tion  is  required as  a treatment  tech-
nique for public water systems supplied
by a  surface water source  and public
                                               443

-------
§141.71
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
water  systems  supplied  by a  ground
water source under the direct influence
of surface water. In addition, these reg-
ulations establish treatment technique
requirements in lieu of maximum  con-
taminant levels for the  following  con-
taminants:   Giardia  lambha,  viruses,
heterotrophic  plate  count  bacteria,
Legione.Ha, and  turbidity.  Each public
water  system  with a  surface  water
source or a ground water source under
the direct influence of surface water
must provide treatment of that source
water  that  complies with these treat-
ment   technique  requirements.   The
treatment technique requirements  con-
sist of installing and properly oper-
ating water treatment processes which
reliably achieve:
  (1) At least  99.9  percent  (3-log) re-
moval  and/or inactivation  of  Giardia
lamblia cysts between a point where the
raw water is not subject to recontami-
nation by surface water runoff and a
point downstream before or at the  first
customer; and
  (2) At  least 99.99  percent  (4-log) re-
moval  and/or inactivation  of  viruses
between a point where the raw water is
not subject to recontamination  by sur-
face water  runoff  and a  point down-
stream before or at  the first customer.
  (b) A  public  water  system using a
surface water source or a ground water
source under the direct  influence  of
surface water  is  considered to be  in
compliance with  the  requirements  of
paragraph (a) of this section if:
  (1) It  meets  the requirements  for
avoiding filtration  in §141.71 and the
disinfection requirements  in §141.72(a);
or
  (2) It  meets  the  filtration require-
ments in §141.73 and  the disinfection
requirements in §141.72(b).
  (c) Each public water system  using a
surface water source or a ground water
source under the  direct  influence  of
surface  water   must  be  operated by
qualified personnel  who  meet  the re-
quirements specified by the State.
  (d) Additional  requirements for  systems
serving at least 10,000 people. In addition
to complying with requirements in this
subpart, systems serving at least 10,000
people must also  comply  with  the re-
quirements in subpart  P of this part.
  (e) Additional  requirements for  systems
serving fewer than 10,000 people. In addi-
tion to complying with requirements in
this subpart,  systems  serving  fewer
than  10.000 people must also comply
with the requirements in subpart T of
this part.
[54 FR 27527, June 29, 1989, as amended at 63
FR  69516, Dec  16, 1998; 67 FR 1836. Jan. 14,
2002]

§141.71   Criteria  for  avoiding  filtra-
    tion.
  A public water system that uses a
surface  water source must meet all of
the conditions of paragraphs (a) and (b)
of this section, and is subject to para-
graph (c) of this section, beginning De-
cember  30, 1991,  unless  the  State has
determined,  in  writing  pursuant  to
§1412(b)(7)(C)(iii), that filtration is  re-
quired.  A  public water system  that
uses a ground  water source  under the
direct influence of surface water must
meet  all of the  conditions of para-
graphs (a) and (b) of this section and is
subject  to paragraph (c) of this section,
beginning 18 months after the State  de-
termines that it is under the direct  in-
fluence  of  surface water, or December
30,  1991,  whichever is  later,  unless the
State has determined,  in writing pursu-
ant to §1412(b)(7)(C)(iii),  that filtration
is required. If the State determines in
writing  pursuant to  §1412(b)(7)(C)(iii)
before December 30,  1991, that filtra-
tion is required, the system  must have
installed filtration and  meet the  cri-
teria  for filtered  systems specified in
§§141.72(b)  and 141.73 by June 29, 1993.
Within  18  months  of  the failure of a
system using surface water or a ground
water source under the direct influence
of surface water to meet any one of the
requirements of paragraphs  (a) and  (b)
of this  section or  after June 29, 1993,
whichever  is  later, the  system must
have installed  filtration  and meet the
criteria  for filtered systems specified
in §§141.72(b) and 141.73.
  (a) Source water quality conditions. (1)
The fecal coliform concentration must
be equal to or less than 20/100 ml, or the
total  coliform concentration must be
equal to or less than 100/100 ml (meas-
ured as  specified in §141.74  (a) (1) and
(2)  and  (b)(l)), in representative  sam-
ples of  the source water immediately
prior  to the first or only point of dis-
infectant application in at least 90 per-
cent of the measurements made for the
                                     444

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.71
6  previous  months that  the system
served water to the public on an ongo-
ing basis. If a system measures  both
fecal and total coliforms, the fecal coli-
form  criterion, but not the total  coli-
form criterion, in this paragraph must
be met.
  (2) The turbidity  level cannot exceed
5 NTU (measured as specified in §141.74
(a)(4) and (b)(2)) in representative sam-
ples of the  source  water  immediately
prior  to the first or only point of dis-
infectant  application  unless:  (i) the
State determines that any such event
was caused by circumstances that were
unusual and unpredictable; and (ii) as a
result of any such event,  there have
not been more than two events in the
past  12 months  the   system  served
water to the public, or more than five
events in the past 120  months the sys-
tem served water  to  the public,  in
which the  turbidity level  exceeded  5
NTU. An "event" is  a series of consecu-
tive days during which at least one tur-
bidity measurement each day exceeds 5
NTU.
  (b)  Site-specific  conditions.  (l)(i) The
public water system must meet the re-
quirements of §141.72(a)(l) at least 11 of
the 12 previous months that the system
served water to the public, on an ongo-
ing- basis, unless the  system fails  to
meet  the requirements during 2 of the
12 previous months that  the system
served  water  to  the  public,  and the
State determines that at least one  of
these  failures  was  caused  by  cir-
cumstances  that were  unusual and un-
predictable.
  (ii)  The public water system must
meet  the requirements of §141.72(a)(2)
at all times the system serves water to
the public.
  (iii) The  public water system must
meet  the requirements of §141.72(a)(3)
at all times the system serves water to
the public unless the State determines
that any such failure  was caused by
circumstances that were  unusual and
unpredictable.
  (iv) The  public water system must
meet  the requirements of §141.72(a)(4)
on  an ongoing basis unless the State
determines that failure to meet these
requirements was not caused by a defi-
ciency  in  treatment   of  the  source
water.
  (2) The public water system  must
maintain a watershed control program
which minimizes the potential for con-
tamination by Giardia lamblia cysts and
viruses in the source water. The  State
must determine whether the watershed
control  program is adequate to  meet
this goal. The  adequacy of a program
to  limit potential contamination by
Giardia lamblia cysts and viruses must
be based on:  the comprehensiveness of
the watershed review; the effectiveness
of the system's program  to monitor
and  control detrimental activities oc-
curring  in  the  watershed;  and the ex-
tent to  which the water  system has
maximized land ownership and/or con-
trolled land use within the watershed.
At a minimum, the watershed control
program must:
  (i) Characterize the  watershed hy-
drology and land ownership;
  (ii) Identify  watershed  characteris-
tics  and  activities which may have an
adverse  effect on source water quality;
and
  (iii) Monitor the occurrence  of activi-
ties  which  may have an adverse  effect
on source water quality.
  The public water system must dem-
onstrate   through  ownership and/or
written   agreements with  landowners
within the watershed that it  can con-
trol all  human activities  which may
have an  adverse impact on the micro-
biological quality of the source water.
The public water system must submit
an  annual report to  the  State  that
identifies any  special  concerns  about
the watershed and how they are  being-
handled;  describes activities in the wa-
tershed  that  affect water quality; and
projects what adverse activities are ex-
pected to occur in  the future and de-
scribes how  the public  water system
expects  to  address them. For systems
using a ground water source under the
direct influence of surface water, an
approved wellhead protection program
developed under section 1428 of the Safe
Drinking Water Act may be used,  if the
State deems it appropriate,  to  meet
these requirements.
  (3) The public water  system must be
subject to an annual on-site inspection
to assess the watershed control pro-
gram and disinfection  treatment  proc-
ess.  Either the State  or a party ap-
proved by the Sbate must  conduct the
                                    445

-------
§141.72
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
on-site inspection. The inspection must
be conducted by competent individuals
such  as  sanitary  and civil  engineers,
sanitarians, or  technicians  who have
experience and  knowledge  about the
operation and maintenance of a public
water system,  and who have a sound
understanding  of public health prin-
ciples and waterborne diseases. A re-
port of the on-site inspection summa-
rizing all  findings  must  be prepared
every  year.  The  on-site  inspection
must indicate to  the State's satisfac-
tion  that  the  watershed  control  pro-
gram and disinfection treatment proc-
ess are adequately designed  and main-
tained. The on-site inspection must in-
clude:
  (i) A  review of the effectiveness  of
the watershed control program;
  (ii) A review  of  the physical condi-
tion of the source intake and how well
it is protected;
  (ill) A review of the system's equip-
ment maintenance program  to  ensure
there is  low probability for  failure  of
the disinfection process;
  (iv) An inspection of the disinfection
equipment for physical deterioration;
  (v) A review of operating procedures;
  (vi) A  review  of data  records to en-
sure that all  required tests  are being
conducted and recorded and disinfec-
tion is effectively practiced; and
  (vii) Identification of any improve-
ments which are needed in  the equip-
ment, system maintenance   and oper-
ation, or data collection.
  (4) The public water system must not
have  been identified as a source  of  a
waterborne disease outbreak, or  if it
has been so identified, the system must
have  been modified sufficiently to pre-
vent another such occurrence, as deter-
mined by the State.
  (5)  The  public  water system  must
comply with  the maximum contami-
nant level (MCL) for total coliforms in
§141.63 at least 11 months of the 12 pre-
vious months that the  system  served
water to the  public, on  an ongoing
basis, unless the State determines that
failure to  meet this requirement was
not  caused by  a  deficiency in treat-
ment of the source water.
  (6)  The  public  water system  must
comply  with  the  requirements  for
trihalomethanes  in §§141.12  and 141.30
until December 31, 2001. After  Decem-
ber 31,  2001,  the system  must  comply
with   the   requirements   for   total
trihalomethanes,   haloacetic    acids
(five),   bromate,   chlorite,   chlorine,
chloramines,  and chlorine  dioxide  in
subpart L of this part.
  (c) Treatment  technique violations. (1)
A system that (i) fails to meet any one
of the criteria in paragraphs (a) and (b)
of this  section and/or which the  State
has determined that filtration is  re-
quired,    in   writing   pursua,nt   to
§1412(b)(7)(C)(iii), and (ii) fails  to  in-
stall filtration by the date specified in
the introductory paragraph of this sec-
tion is in violation of a treatment tech-
nique requirement.
  (2) A system  that  has not installed
filtration is in violation of a treatment
technique requirement if:
  (i) The turbidity level (measured  as
specified in §141.74(a)(4) and  (b)(2)) in a
representative  sample of the  source
water immediately prior to the  first or
only point of disinfection application
exceeds 5 NTU; or
  (ii)  The system  is identified  as a
source  of a waterborne  disease  out-
break.

[54 FR 27527, June 29, 1989, as amended at 63
FR  69516, Dec. 16, 1998;  66 FR 3776, Jan.  16,
2001]
 EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38855, June
29, 2004, §141.71 was amended in paragraph
(a)(2) introductory text  by removing- the  ci-
tation "§141.74(a)(4)" and adding  in its place
"§141.74(a)(l)" and in paragraph (c)(2)(i) by re-
moving the citation "§141.74(a)(4)" and adding
in its place "§141.74(a)(l>", effective  July  29,
2004.

§ 141.72  Disinfection.
  A public water system that uses a
surface water source  and does not pro-
vide filtration treatment must  provide
the disinfection treatment specified in
paragraph (a) of this  section beginning
December 30, 1991, unless the State de-
termines that filtration is required  in
writing pursuant to  §1412 (b)(7)(C)(iii).
A  public water system  that  uses a
ground water source  under  the direct
influence of surface water and does not
provide filtration treatment must pro-
vide disinfection treatment specified in
paragraph (a) of this  section beginning
December 30, 1991,  or 18 months after
the State determines that the  ground
water source is under the influence of
                                     446

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.72
surface water, whichever is  later, un-
less the State has determined that fil-
tration is required in writing pursuant
to  §1412(b)(7)(C)(iii). If the  State has
determined that filtration is required,
the  system must comply with any in-
terim  disinfection  requirements  the
State deems necessary before filtration
is installed. A system that uses a sur-
face water  source  that provides filtra-
tion  treatment must provide the dis-
infection treatment specified in para-
graph (b) of this section begmnng  June
29.  1993, or beginning when filtration is
installed, whichever is later. A system
that uses a ground water source under
the  direct  influence  of  surface water
and provides filtration treatment must
provide disinfection treatment as  spec-
ified in paragraph (b) of this section by
June 29. 1993. or beginning when filtra-
tion  is installed,  whichever is later.
Failure  to  meet any requirement of
this section after the applicable  date
specified  in  this  introductory  para-
graph is a  treatment technique viola-
tion.
  (a) Disinfection requirements for public
water systems that  do not provide filtra-
tion.  Each  public water  system  that
does not  provide filtration treatment
must provide disinfection treatment as
follows:
  (1)  The disinfection  treatment must
be sufficient to ensure at least 99.9 per-
cent  (3-log)  inactivation of  Giardia
lambha  cysts and  99.99 percent  (4-log)
inactivation of viruses, every day the
system  serves water to the public, ex-
cept any one day each month. Each day
a system serves water to the public,
the public water system must calculate
the  CT value(s)  from  the  system's
treatment parameters, using the proce-
dure  specified in §141.74(b)(3), and de-
termine whether this value(s) is suffi-
cient to achieve the specified inactiva-
tion rates for Giardia lamblia  cysts and
viruses. If a system uses a disinfectant
other than  chlorine,  the system  may
demonstrate to the State,  through the
use of a State-approved protocol for on-
site disinfection  challenge studies  or
other information satisfactory to the
State, that  CTq9q values  other  than
those specified in tables 2.1 and 3.1 in
 141.74(b)(3">  or  other  operational  pa-
rameters are  adequate to demonstrate
Jiat the system is achieving  minimum
inactivation  rates  required by  para-
graph (a)(l) of this section.
  (2)  The  disinfection  system  must
have  either (i) redundant components,
including  an auxiliary  power supply
with  automatic start-up and alarm to
ensure that disinfectant application is
maintained continuously while  water
is being  delivered to the  distribution
system, or (ii) automatic shut-off of de-
livery of  water to the distribution sys-
tem whenever there is less than 0.2 mg/
1 of residual disinfectant concentration
in the water. If the State  determines
that  automatic  shut-off would  cause
unreasonable  risk to health or  inter-
fere with fire protection,  the system
must comply with paragraph (a)(2)(i) of
this section.
  (3)  The residual  disinfectant  con-
centration in the water entering  the
distribution system, measured as  speci-
fied in §141.74 (a)(5)  and (b)(5), cannot
be less than  0.2  mg/1 for more than 4
hours.
  (4)(i) The residual disinfectant con-
centration in the distribution  system,
measured as  total chlorine, combined
chlorine,  or chlorine dioxide, as  speci-
fied in §141.74 (a)(5)  and (b)(6). cannot
be undetectable in more than 5 percent
of the samples each month, for any two
consecutive months that  the  system
serves water to the public. Water in the
distribution     system     with     a
heterotrophic bacteria  concentration
less than or equal to 500/ml. measured
as heterotrophic plate  count (HPC) as
specified  in §141.74(a)(3), is deemed to
have a detectable disinfectant residual
for purposes of determining compliance
with this requirement.  Thus, the  value
"V" in the following  formula cannot ex-
ceed 5 percent in one  month,  for any
two consecutive months.
                a + b
where.
a=number  of instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is measured;
b=number  of instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is not measured
  but  heterotrophic  bacteria plate  count
  (HPC) is measured:
c=number  of instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is measured but
  not detected and no  HPC is measured;
d=number  of instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is measured but
                                     447

-------
§141.73
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  not detected and where the HPC is >500/ml;
  and
e=number  of instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is not measured
  and HPC is >500/ml.
  (ii) If the State determines, based on
site-specific considerations, that a sys-
tem has no means for having- a sample
transported and analyzed for HPC by a
certified laboratory under the requisite
time and temperature conditions speci-
fied by §141.74(a)(3)  and that  the sys-
tem is providing adequate disinfection
in the distribution system, the require-
ments of paragraph (a)(4)(i) of this sec-
tion do not apply to that system.
  (b) Disinfection requirements for public
water systems  which  provide filtration.
Each public water system that provides
filtration treatment  must provide  dis-
infection treatment as follows.
  (1) The disinfection treatment must
be  sufficient  to ensure  that the total
treatment  processes of  that  system
achieve at least 99.9 percent (3-log)  in-
activation  and/or removal  of Giardia
lamblia cysts and at least  99.99 percent
(4-log) inactivation  and/or removal of
viruses, as determined by the State.
  (2)  The  residual   disinfectant  con-
centration  in  the water  entering  the
distribution system, measured as speci-
fied in  §141.74 (a)(5) and (c)(2), cannot
be  less than 0.2 mg/1 for  more than 4
hours.
  (3)(i)  The residual disinfectant  con-
centration  in  the distribution system,
measured as  total  chlorine, combined
chlorine, or chlorine dioxide, as speci-
fied in  §141.74 (a)(5) and (c)(3), cannot
be undetectable in more than 5 percent
of the samples each month, for any  two
consecutive months  that the system
serves water to the public. Water in the
distribution     system     with     a
heterotrophic  bacteria  concentration
less than or equal to 500/ml, measured
as heterotrophic plate  count (HPC) as
specified in §141.74(a)(3), is  deemed to
have a detectable disinfectant residual
for purposes of determining compliance
with this requirement. Thus, the value
"V" in the following formula cannot  ex-
ceed 5 percent in one month, for  any
two consecutive months.
c + d + e
 a + b
                       xlOO
where:
a=number  of  instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is measured;
t>=number  of  instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is not measured
  but  heterotrophic  bacteria plate  count
  (HPC) is measured;
c=number  of  instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is measured but
  not detected and no HPC is measured;
d=number of instances where no residual dis-
  infectant  concentration is  detected  and
  where the HPC is >500/ml; and
e=number  of  instances where the residual
  disinfectant concentration is not measured
  and HPC is >500/ml.

  (ii)  If the State determines,  based on
site-specific considerations, that a sys-
tem has no means for having a sample
transported  and analyzed for HPC by a
certified laboratory under  the requisite
time and temperature conditions speci-
fied in §141.74(a)(3) and that the system
is providing adequate disinfection in
the distribution  system,  the  require-
ments of paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this sec-
tion do not apply.

  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38855, June
29, 2004, §141.72 was amended in paragraph
(a)(3) by removing the citation "§141.74(a)(5)"
and adding in  its  place "§141.74(a)(2>"; in
paragraph (a)(4)(i) by removing  the citation
"§141.74(a)(5)"   and   adding   in  its  place
"§141.74(a)(2)"  and by  removing tie citation
"§141.74(a)(3)"   and   adding   in  its  place
"§141.74(a)(D"; in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) by re-
moving the  citation "§141.74(a)(3)" and adding
in its place "§141.74(a)(D"; in paragraph (b)(2)
by removing  the citation "§141.74(a)(5>" and
adding in  its place  "§141.74(a)(2)"; in para-
graph  (b)(3)(i)  by  removing  the citation
"§141.74(a)(5)"   and   adding   in  its  place
"§141.74(a)(2)"  and by  removing the citation
"§141.74(a)(3)"   and   adding   in  its  place
"§141.74(a)(D"; and in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) by
removing the  citation "§141.74(a)(3i" and  add-
ing in its place "§141.74(a)(l)", effective July
29, 2004

§ 141.73  Filtration.

  A public water  system  that uses a
surface water source or a ground water
source  under the  direct  influence o
surface water, and  does not meet all o
the criteria in §141.71 (a) and (b)  for
avoiding filtration, must provide treat-
ment consisting of both disinfection, as
specified  in  §141.72(b),  and  filtratior
treatment which  complies with the re
quirements  of paragraph  (a), (b),  (c)
(d), or (e) of this  section by  June 29
1993, or within 18 months of the failure
to  meet  any one  of the criteria  foi
                                       448

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §141.73
avoiding  filtration in  §141.71 (a) and
(t>), whichever is later. Failure to meet
any requirement of this section after
the date specified in this introductory
paragraph  is  a  treatment  technique
violation.
  (a) Conventional filtration treatment or
direct filtration. (1) For  systems  using
conventional filtration  or direct filtra-
tion, the  turbidity level of representa-
tive samples  of  a system's filtered
water must be less than or equal  to 0.5
NTU in at least 95 percent of the meas-
urements taken each month, measured
as specified in §141.74  (a)(4) and (c)(l),
except  that  if the  State  determines
that the system is capable of achieving
at least 99.9 percent removal and/or in-
activation of Giardia lamblia cysts at
some turbidity  level higher than 0.5
NTU in at least 95 percent of the meas-
urements taken each month, the  State
may substitute  this  higher  turbidity
limit for  that system. However,  in no
case may the State approve a turbidity
limit that allows more than 1 NTU in
more than 5 percent  of the  samples
taken each month, measured as speci-
fied in §141.74 (a)(4) and (c)(l).
  (2) The  turbidity level of representa-
tive samples  of  a  system's filtered
water must  at no time  exceed 5  NTU,
measured  as  specified in §141.74  (a)(4)
and (c)(l).
  (3) Beginning  January 1.  2002,  sys-
tems serving at least 10,000 people must
meet the turbidity  requirements in
§141.173(a).
  (4) Beginning January 14, 2005, sys-
tems  serving- fewer than 10,000 people
must meet the turbidity requirements
in §§141.550 through 141.553.
  (b) Slow sand filtration. (1)  For sys-
tems  using  slow  sand  filtration, the
turbidity  level of representative sam-
ples of a  system's filtered water must
be less  than  or equal to 1  NTU  in at
least  95 percent of the  measurements
taken each month, measured as speci-
fied in  §141.74 (a)(4) and (c)(l), except
that if the State determines there is no
significant interference  with disinfec-
tion at a higher  turbidity level, the
State may substitute this higher tur-
bidity limit for that system.
  (2) The  turbidity level of representa-
tive samples  of  a  system's  filtered
water must at no time exceed 5 NTU,
measured as  specified in §141.74  (a)(4)
and (c)(l).
  (c)  Diatomaceous  earth  filtration. (1)
For systems using diatomaceous earth
filtration,  the  turbidity  level  of  rep-
resentative samples of a system's fil-
tered water must be less than or equal
to 1 NTU in at least 95 percent of the
measurements   taken   each   month,
measured as  specified in §141.74  (a)(4)
and (c)(l).
  (2) The turbidity level of representa-
tive  samples  of a  system's  filtered
water must at  no time exceed  5 NTU,
measured as  specified in §141.74  (a)(4)
and (c)(l).
  (d) Other filtration technologies. A  pub-
lic  water system may use a  filtration
technology not listed in paragraphs (a)
through (c) of  this  section if it  dem-
onstrates  to  the State,  using  pilot
plant studies  or other means, that the
alternative filtration technology, in
combination  with  disinfection  treat-
ment that meets the  requirements of
§141.72(b),  consistently  achieves  99.9
percent removal and/or inactivation of
Giardia lamblia  cysts and 99.99 percent
removal and/or inactivation of viruses.
For a system  that  makes this  dem-
onstration, the requirements of para-
graph (b) of this  section apply. Begin-
ning  January 1. 2002,  systems  serving
at least 10,000 people must meet the re-
quirements for other filtration tech-
nologies in §141.173Cb). Beginning Janu-
ary 14, 2005, systems  serving fewer than
10,000  people  must meet the require-
ments for other filtration technologies
in §141.550 through 141.553.

[54 FR 27527, June 29, 1989, as amended  at 63
FR  69516, Dec. 16, 1998; 66 FR 3776,  Jan. 16,
2001; 67 FR 1836, Jan. 14, 2002]
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR  38855,  June
29, 2004, §141.73 was amended in  paragraph
(a)(l)   by   removing   both  citations
"§141.74(a)(4)" and  adding  in  their  place
"§141.74(a)(D"; in paragraph (a)(2)  by remov-
ing  the citation "§141.74(a)(4)" and adding in
its place "§141.74(a)(l)"; in paragraph  (a)(4) by
removing the date "January 14, 2005"  and add-
ing  in its place "January 1, 2005";  in para-
graph   (b)(l) by  removing  the  citation
"§141.74(a)(4)"  and  adding  in  its  place
"§141.74(a)(D"; in paragraph (bX2)  by remov-
ing  the citation "§141.74(a)(4)" and adding in
its place "§141 74(a)(l)"; in paragraph  (c)(l) by
removing the citation "§141.74(a)(4)" and add-
ing  in its place "§141.74(a)(D"; and  in para-
graph   (c)(2) by  removing  the  citation
                                      449

-------
§141.74
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
"§141.74(a)(4)"   and  adding  in   its  place
"§141.74(a)(l)", effective July 29, 2004.

§ 141.74  Analytical and monitoring re-
    quirements.
  (a)  Analytical  requirements.  Only the
analytical method(s)  specified  in  this
paragraph,  or  otherwise  approved by
EPA, may be used to demonstrate com-
pliance with §§141.71,  141.72 and 141.73.
Measurements  for  pH, turbidity, tem-
perature and residual  disinfectant  con-
centrations  must  be  conducted by  a
person approved by the State. Measure-
ment  for  total  coliforms,  fecal coli-
forms and HPC must be conducted by a
laboratory  certified by the  State  or
EPA  to do such analysis.  Until  labora-
tory  certification  criteria  are  devel-
oped  for the analysis of fecal  coliforms
and HPC,  any  laboratory certified for
total coliforms analysis by the State or
EPA  is deemed  certified for  fecal coli-
forms and HPC analysis. The  following
procedures shall be conducted  in  ac-
cordance with the  publications listed
in the following section. This incorpo-
ration  by reference was  approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 TJ.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR  part 51. Copies of  the methods
published  in Standard Methods  for the
Examination  of  Water  and  Wastewater
may  be obtained  from the  American
Public Health  Association et al.,  1015
Fifteenth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005;  copies of  the Minimal Medium
ONPG-MUG Method as set forth in the
article "National Field Evaluation of a
Defined Substrate Method for  the Si-
multaneous Enumeration  of Total Coli-
forms and Esherichia coli from Drinking
Water: Comparison with  the  Standard
Multiple Tube  Fermentation Method"
(Edberg et al.),  Applied  and Environ-
mental  Microbiology,  Volume  54,  pp.
1595-1601, June 1988 (as  amended under
Erratum,  Applied  and  Environmental
Microbiology, Volume 54, p.  3197, De-
cember, 1988),  may be obtained from
the American Water Works Association
Research Foundation, 6666 West Quincy
Avenue, Denver,  Colorado,  80235; and
copies of the Indigo Method as set forth
in the article "Determination of Ozone
in Water by the Indigo  Method" (Bader
and  Hoigne), may be  obtained from
Ozone    Science   &    Engineering,
Pergamon Press Ltd.,  Fairview Park,
Elmsford,  New York 10523. Copies may
be inspected at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Room EB15, 401 M
St.,  SW.,  Washington, DC 20460 or  at
the National Archives and Records Ad-
ministration (NARA). For information
on the availability  of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of__federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1)  Public water systems mast con-
duct analysis of pH and temperature in
accordance  with  one of  the methods
listed at §141.23(k)(l). Public water sys-
tems  must  conduct analysis of  total
coliforms,        fecal        coliforms,
heterotrophic bacteria,  and  turbidity
in accordance with one of the following
analytical methods and by using ana-
lytical test  procedures  contained  in
Technical Notes on Drinking Water Meth-
ods,   EPA-600/R-94-173,   October  1994,
which is available at NTIS PB95-104766.
Organism
Total Coliform2






Fecal Coliforms2



Heterotrophic bac-
teria2

Turbidity
Methodology
Total Coliform Fer-
mentation Tech-
nique14*
Total Coliform
Membrane Filter
Technique6
ONPG-MUG Test7
Fecal Coliform
Procedure3
Fecal Coliform Fil-
ter Procedure
Pour Plate Method

SimPlate"
Nephelometric
| Method





Nephelometnc
Method
Great Lakes In-
struments
Hach FilterTrak .
Citation i
9221 A, B, C


9222 A, B, C


9223
9221 E

9222 D

9215 B


2130B

180 19

Method 2 10

1013312
  The procedures shall be done in accordance with the docu-
ments listed below The incorporation by reference of the fol-
lowing documents listed in footnotes 1, 6, 7 and 9-12 was ap-
proved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U S C 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 Copies of the docu-
ments may be obtained from the sources listed below Infor-
mation regarding obtaining these documents can be obtained
from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 800-^126-4791 Doc-
uments may be  inspected at EPA's Dnnkmg Water Docket,
1301  Constitution Avenue, NW, EPA West,  Room B102,
Washington DC 20460 (Telephone 202-566-2426), or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) For in-
formation on the availability of this material at NARA, call
202-741-6030,   or  go  to   http//www archives gov/
federal_register/code _o?_fec/era/	regulations/
ibr_locations.html
  1 Except where noted, all methods refer to Standard Meth-
ods tor the Examination ot Water and Wastewater, 18th edi-
tion (1992),  19th edition (1995),  or 20th edition (1998), Amer-
ican Public  Health Association,  1015 Fifteenth Street, NW ,
Washington, DC 20005 The cited methods published in any
of these three editions may be used.
                                        450

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                  §141.74
  2The time from sample collection to initiation ot analysis
may not exceed 8 hours Systems must hold samples below
10 deg C during transit
  3 Lactose broth, as commercially available may be used in
lieu of lauryl tryptose broth, if the system conducts at least 25
parallel tests between this medium and lauryl tryptose broth
using the water normally tested, and this comparison dem-
onstrates that the false-positive rate and false-negative rate
for total coliform, using lactose broth, is less than 10 percent
  "Media should cover inverted tubes at least one-half to two-
thirds after the sample is added
  5 No requirement exists to  run the completed phase on 10
percent of all total coliform-positive confirmed tubes
  6 Ml agar also  may be used Preparation and use of Ml
agar is set forth in the article, "New medium for the simulta-
neous detection of total coliform and Eschenchia co/i in water"
by Brenner, K P, et  al, 1993, Appl  Environ  Microbiol
59:3534-3544 Also available from the Office of Water Re-
source Center (RC-4100T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW ,
Washington  DC  20460, EPA/600/J-99/225 Verification of
colonies is not required
  7The ONPG-MUG Test is  also known as the Autoanalysis
Colilert System
  8A-1 Broth may be held  up  to three months in a tightly
closed screw cap tube at 4 deg  C
  9 "Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in
Environmental Samples", EPA/600/R-93/100, August 1993
Available at NTIS, PB94-121811
  10GLI Method  2, "Turbidity",  November 2,  1992, Great
Lakes Instruments, Inc ,  8855 North 55th Street, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53223
  "A description of the SimPlate method, "IDEXX SimPlate
TM HPC Test Method for Heterotrophs in Water",  November
2000, can be obtained from IDEXX Laboratories, Inc , One
IDEXX Drive, Westbrook, Maine 04092, telephone (800) 321-
0207
  12 A description of the Hach FilterTrak Method 10133, "De-
termination  of Turbidity by  Laser  Nephelometry", January
2000, Revision 2 0, can be  obtained from, Hach Co,  P O
Box  389, Loveland, Colorado 80539-0389  Phone  800-227-
4224

  (2)  Public water  systems must  meas-
ure  residual  disinfectant  concentra-
tions with one of the analytical meth-
ods in the  following table. Except  for
the method for ozone residuals, the dis-
infectant  residual  methods  are  con-
tained in the  18th, 19th. and 20th edi-
tions of Standard  Methods  for the Ex-
amination  of Water and Wastewater,
1992,  1995,  and 1998;  the cited methods
published in any of these three editions
may  be  used. The  ozone  method,  4500-
O3  B, is contained  in both the 18th and
19th  editions of Standard Methods  for
the Examination of  Water  and Waste-
water,  1992, 1995: either edition may be
used. If approved by the State, residual
disinfectant  concentrations  for  free
chlorine and  combined  chlorine also
may  be measured by using DPD colori-
metric  test  kits. Free  and total chlo-
rine  residuals may  be measured con-
tinuously by adapting a specified chlo-
rine  residual  method  for  use  with a
continuous monitoring instrument pro-
vided the chemistry,  accuracy, and pre-
cision remain same.  Instruments used
for  continuous   monitoring  must  be
calibrated with a grab sample measure-
ment at least every  five days, or with
a protocol approved by the State.
Free Chlo-
  rine
Total Chlo-
  rine
Chlorine Di-
  oxide
Ozone
             Methodology
Amperometnc Trtration

DPD Ferrous
 Titnmetnc
DPD Colorimetric
Syrmgaldazme
 (FACTS)
Amperometnc Titration

Amperometnc Titration
 (low level measure-
 ment)
DPD Ferrous
 Titrimetnc
DPD Colorimetric
lodometnc Electrode
Amperometnc Titration

DPD Method
Amperometnc Titration
Indigo Method
4500-CI D

4500-CI F

4500-CI G
4500-CI H

4500-CI D

4500-CI E


4500-CI F

4500-CI G
4500-CI I
4500-CIO2 C

4500-CIO2 D
4500-CIO2 E
4500-O, B
  (b) Monitoring requirements for systems
that  do not provide filtration.  A public
water system that uses a surface water
source and does not provide filtration
treatment must begin monitoring, as
specified  in  this paragraph (b), begin-
ning  December  31,  1990,  unless  the
State has determined that filtration is
required   in   writing   pursuant   to
§1412(b)(7)(C)(iii),   in  which  case  the
State  may  specify  alternative moni-
toring  requirements,  as   appropriate,
until  filtration is  in  place. A public
water system that uses a ground water
source  under  the  direct  influence of
surface water and  does not provide fil-
tration treatment  must  begin moni-
toring as specified  in this paragraph (b)
beginning  December  31,  1990,  or  6
months after the State determines that
the  ground water  source  is under the
direct   influence   of  surface  water,
whichever is later, unless the State has
determined that filtration is required
in       writing       pursuant       to
§1412(b)(7)(C)(iii),   in  which  case  the
State  may  specify  alternative moni-
toring  requirements,  as   appropriate,
until filtration  is in place.
  (1) Fecal coliform or  total coliform
density measurements  as  required  by
§141.71(a)(l) must be performed  on rep-
resentative source  water  samples  im-
mediately prior to  the  first  or  only
point of disinfectant application. The
system must sample for fecal  or total
coliforms  at the  following  minimum
frequency each week the system serves
water to the public:
                                          451

-------
§141.74
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
System size (persons served)
^500
501 to 3,300
3,301 to 10,000
10,001 to 25,000
>25,000
Samples/
week1
1
2
3
4
5
 1 Must be taken on separate days
  Also, one fecal or total coliform den-
sity measurement must be made every
day the  system  serves  water  to  the
public and the turbidity of the source
water exceeds 1  NTU  (these samples
count towards  the  weekly  coliform
sampling requirement) unless the State
determines   that  the   system,  for
logistical reasons  outside the system's
control, cannot have the sample ana-
lyzed within 30 hours of collection.
  (2)  Turbidity  measurements  as re-
quired  by  §141.71(a)(2)  must  be per-
formed on representative grab samples
of source  water immediately prior to
the first or only point  of  disinfectant
application every four  hours  (or more
frequently)  that   the   system  serves
water to the public. A public water sys-
tem  may substitute  continuous tur-
bidity  monitoring  for  grab   sample
monitoring if it  validates the  contin-
uous measurement for  accuracy  on a
regular basis using a protocol approved
by the State.
  (3)  The  total  inactivation ratio for
each day  that the system  is in oper-
ation must be determined based on the
CT99c>  values in tables  1.1-1.6,  2.1,  and
3.1  of this section, as appropriate. The
parameters necessary to determine the
total inactivation  ratio must be mon-
itored as follows:
  (i) The temperature of the disinfected
water must be measured at least once
per  day at  each residual  disinfectant
concentration sampling point.
  (ii) If the system uses chlorine, the
pH of the disinfected  water must be
measured at least once per day at each
chlorine   residual  disinfectant  con-
centration sampling point.
  (iii) The disinfectant contact  time(s)
("T") must be determined for each day
during peak hourly flow.
  (iv)  The residual disinfectant con-
centration^)  ("C")  oi the water before
or at the first customer must be meas-
ured each day during peak hourly flow.
  (v) If a system  uses  a  disinfectant
other than  chlorine, the system may
demonstrate to the State, through the
use of a State-approved protocol for on-
site  disinfection  challenge  studies or
other information satisfactory  to the
State, that CT99Q  values  other  than
those specified in tables 2.1 and 3.1 in
this section other operational param-
eters are adequate to demonstrate that
the system is achieving  the minimum
inactivation    rates    required    by
§141.72(a)(l).

TABLE 1.1—CT VALUES (CT999) FOR 99.9 PER-
  CENT  INACTIVATION  OF  GIARDIA  LAMBLIA
  CYSTS BY  FREE CHLORINE AT 0.5  °C OR
  LOWER 1
Resid-
ual
(mg/l)
SO 4
06
08
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
20
22
24
26
28
30
pH
S60
137
141
145
148
152
155
157
162
165
169
172
175
178
181
65
163
168
172
176
180
184
189
193
197
201
205
209
213
217
70
195
200
205
210
215
221
226
231
236
242
247
252
257
261
75
237
239
246
253
259
266
273
279
286
297
298
304
310
316
80
277
286
295
304
313
321
329
338
346
353
361
368
375
382
85
329
342
354
365
376
387
397
407
417
426
435
444
452
460
S90
390
407
422
437
451
464
477
489
500
511
522
533
543
552
  1 These CT values achieve greater than a 99 99 percent in-
activation of viruses  CT values between the indicated pH val-
ues may be determined by linear interpolation CT values be-
tween the indicated  temperatures of different tables may be
determined by linear interpolation If no interpolation is used,
use the CTW >, value  at the lower temperature and at the high-
er pH

TABLE  1.2—CT VALUES  (CT 999)  FOR  99.9
  PERCENT  INACTIVATION OF  GIARDIA LAMBLIA
  CYSTS BY FREE CHLORINE AT 5.0 °C1
 Free
                      pH
lebiu-
ual
(mg/l)
SO 4
06
08
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
20
22
24
26
28
30
£60
97
100
103
105
107
109
111
114
116
118
120
122
124
126
65
117
120
122
125
127
130
132
135
138
140
143
146
148
151
70
139
143
146
149
152
155
158
162
165
169
172
175
178
182
75
166
171
175
179
183
187
192
196
200
204
209
213
217
221
80
198
204
210
216
221
227
232
238
243
248
253
258
263
268
85
236
244
252
260
267
274
281
287
294
300
306
312
318
324
S90
279
291
301
312
320
329
337
345
353
361
368
375
382
389
 1 These CT values achieve greater than a 99 99 percent in-
activation of viruses  CT values between the indicated pH val-
ues may be determined by linear interpolation. CT values be-
tween the indicated  temperatures of different tables may be
determined by linear interpolation. If no interpolation is used,
use the CTg9Q value at the lower temperature, and at the
higher pH
                                      be
                                       452

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                                                           §141.74
TABLE  1.3—CT  VALUES  (CT gg9)  FOR  99.9
   PERCENT INACTIVATION  OF  GIARDIA LAMBLIA
   CYSTS BY FREE CHLORINE AT 10.0  °C1
Free
resid-
ual
(mg/l)
SO 4
06
08
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
20
22
24
26
28
30
pH
£60
73
75
78
79
80
82
83
86
87
89
90
92
93
95
65
88
90
92
94
95
98
99
101
104
105
107
110
111
113
70
104
107
110
112
114
116
119
122
124
127
129
131
134
137
75
125
128
131
134
137
140
144
147
150
153
157
160
163
166
80
149
153
158
162
166
170
174
179
182
186
190
194
197
201
85
177
183
189
195
200
206
211
215
221
225
230
234
239
243
S90
209
218
226
234
240
247
253
259
265
271
276
281
287
292
  1 These CT values achieve greater than a 99 99 percent in-
activation of viruses CT values between the indicated pH val-
ues may be determined by linear interpolation  CT values be-
tween the indicated temperatures of different tables may be
determined by linear interpolation If no interpolation is used,
use the  CT999 value at the lower temperature, and at the
higher pH

TABLE  1.4—CT  VALUES  (CT 999)  FOR  99.9
  PERCENT  INACTIVATION  OF  GIARDIA LAMBLIA
  CYSTS BY FREE CHLORINE AT 15.0 °C1
Free
resid-
ual
(mg/l)
SO 4
06
08
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
20
22
24
26
28
30
PH
S60
49
50
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
65
59
60
61
63
64
65
66
68
69
70
72
73
74
76
70
70
72
73
75
76
78
79
81
83
85
86
88
89
91
75
83
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
105
107
109
111
80
99
102
105
108
111
114
116
119
122
124
127
129
132
134
85
118
122
126
130
134
137
141
144
147
150
153
156
159
162
S90
140
146
151
156
160
165
169
173
177
181
184
188
191
195
  1 These CT values achieve greater than a 99 99 percent in-
activation of viruses CT values between the indicated pH val-
ues may be determined by linear interpolation  CT values be-
tween the indicated temperatures of different tables may be
determined  by linear interpolation If no interpolation ;s used,
use the  CTggg value at the lower temperature, and at the
higher pH
                                                     TABLE 1.5—CT VALUES (CT999)  FOR 99.9 PER-
                                                       CENT   INACTIVATION   OF   GIARDIA  LAMBLIA
                                                       CYSTS  BY FREE CHLORINE AT 20°C1
Free
resid-
ual
(mg/l)
S 04
06
08
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
20
22
24
26
28
pH
S60
36
38
39
39
40
41
42
43
44
44
45
46
47
30 | 47
65
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
70
52
54
55
56
57
58
59
61
62
63
65
66
67
57 68
75
62
64
66
67
69
70
72
74
75
77
78
80
81
83
80
74
77
79
81
83
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
101
85
89
92
95
98
100
103
105
108
110
113
115
117
119
122
S 90
105
109
113
117
120
123
126
129
132
135
138
141
143
146
                                                      1 These CT values achieve greater than a 99 99 percent m-
                                                     activation of viruses CT values between the indicated pH val-
                                                     ues may be determined by linear interpolation CT values be-
                                                     tween the indicated temperatures of different tables may be
                                                     determined by linear interpolation If no interpolation is used,
                                                     use the CTWV value at the  lower  temperature, and at the
                                                     higher pH

                                                     TABLE 1.6—CT VALUES (CT99 <») FOR 99.9 PER-
                                                       CENT   INACTIVATION   OF   GIARDIA  LAMBLIA
                                                       CYSTS BY  FREE  CHLORINE AT  25°C1  AND
                                                       HIGHER
Free
resid-
ual
(mg/l)
S04
06
08
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
20 ..
22
24
26
28
30
PH
S60
24
25
26
26
27
27
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
65
29
30
31
31
32
33
33
34
35
35
36
37
37
38
70
35
36
37
37
38
39
40
41
41
42
43
44
45
46
75
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
80
50
51
53
54
55
57
58
60
61
62
63
65
66
67
85
59
61
63
65
67
69
70
72
74
75
77
78
80
81
390
70
73
75
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
97
                                                      1 These CT values achieve greater than a 99 99 percent m-
                                                    activation of viruses CT values between the indicated pH val-
                                                    ues may be determined by linear interpolation CT values be-
                                                    tween the indicated temperatures of different tables may be
                                                    determined by linear interpolation If no interpolation is used,
                                                    use the CTOT9 value at the lower  temperature, and at the
                                                    higher pH
 TABLE 2.1—CT VALUES  (CT999) FOR 99.9 PERCENT INACTIVATION OF GIARDIA LAMBLIA CYSTS BY
                                   CHLORINE DIOXIDE AND OZONEI


Chlorine dioxide
Ozone

<1°C 5°C J
63 26 |
29 1 9 i
Temperature
10 C 15°C j
23 19 \
14 0 95 i

20 °C j
15 !
072 |

325°C
11
048
  1 These CT values achieve greater than 99 99 percent inactivation of viruses CT values between the indicated temperatures
may be determined by linear interpolation  If no interpolation is used,  use the CT^i, value at the lower temperature for deter-
mining CTj<)9 values between indicated temperatures
                                                 453

-------
§141.74
                                40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
TABLE 3.1—CT VALUES  (CT 999)  FOR 99.9
  PERCENT INACTIVATION  OF GIARDIA LAMBLIA
  CYSTS BY CHLORAMINESI
Temperature
< 1 °C
3,800
5°C
2,200
10 °C
1,850
15 °C
1,500
20 °C
1,100
25 °C
750
  1 These values are for pH values of 6 to 9 These CT val-
ues may be assumed to achieve greater than 99.99 percent
inactivation of viruses only if chlorine is added and mixed in
the water prior to the addition of ammonia If this condition is
not met, the system must demonstrate, based on on-site stud-
ies or other information, as approved by the State, that the
system is achieving at least 99 99 percent mactivation of vi-
ruses CT values between the indicated temperatures may be
determined by linear interpolation If no interpolation is used,
use the CT99 9 value at the lower temperature for determining
CTM 9 values between indicated temperatures

  (4) The total inactivation ratio must
be calculated as follows:
  (i) If the system uses only one point
of disinfectant application, the system
                      may determine  the  total  inactivation
                      ratio based on either of the following
                      two methods:
                        (A) One inactivation  ratio  (CTcalc/
                      CT999) is determined before or at  the
                      first customer during peak hourly flow
                      and if the CTcalc/CT99 9  z 1.0, the  99.9
                      percent Giardia lamblia inactivation re-
                      quirement has been achieved: or
                        (B) Successive CTcalc/CT9<>9 values,
                      representing-   sequential  inactivation
                      ratios,  are  determined  between  the
                      point of disinfectant application and a
                      point before  or at the  first customer
                      during peak hourly flow. Under this al-
                      ternative, the following method must
                      be used to calculate the  total inactiva-
                      tion ratio:
             (1)


             (2)


             (3)
       .    CTcalc
Determine	for each sequence.
           ^ i99 9

 AJJ ,   CTcalc    ,         ,   (V (CTcalc)"\
Add the	values together >  	
         r^T                   I ~^  {~"T     I
         v'199.9                V    v'199.9  )

If  £    CTcalc J > 1.0, the 99.9 percent Giardia
lamblia inactivation  requirement  has
been achieved.
  (ii) If the system uses more than one
point of disinfectant application before
or  at  the first  customer,  the system
must determine the CT value  of  each
disinfection   sequence   immediately
prior to the next point of disinfectant
application  during peak hourly flow.
The  CTcalc/CT999  value  of  each se-
quence and

                 CTcalc
  must be calculated using the method
in paragraph (b)(4)(i)(B) of this section
to determine if the system is in com-
pliance with §142.72(a).
  (iii) Although not required, the total
percent inactivation for a system with
one  or  more points  of residual dis-
infectant   concentration   monitoring
                      may be  calculated by solving the  fol-
                      lowing equation:

                                                     100
                          Percent inactivation = 100 ---
                                           CTcalc
                                    „  ^      a
                          where z = 3 x 2J - -
                                          V CT99 9 )
                        (5)  The  residual  disinfectant  con-
                      centration  of the water entering  the
                      distribution system must be monitored
                      continuously, and  the  lowest  value
                      must be recorded each day, except that
                      if there is  a failure in the continuous
                      monitoring  equipment,  grab sampling
                      every 4 hours may be conducted in lieu
                      of continuous monitoring, but  for  no
                      more than  5 working days  following
                      the failure of the equipment, and sys-
                      tems serving 3,300 or fewer persons may
                      take  grab samples in lieu of providing
                      continuous monitoring  on an ongoing
                                       454

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.74
basis  at  the  frequencies  prescribed
below:
System size by population
<500
501 to 1 ,000
1 ,001 to 2,500
2,501 to 3,300
Samples/
day1
1
2
3
4
  1 The day's samples cannot be taken at the same time The
sampling intervals are subject to State review and approval

If at any time the residual disinfectant
concentration falls below 0.2 mg/1 in a
system using grab sampling in lieu of
continuous  monitoring,  the  system
must take a  grab sample every 4 hours
until  the residual  concentration  is
equal to or greater than 0.2 mg/1.
  (6)(i)  The residual disinfectant  con-
centration must be measured at least
at the same  points in the distribution
system and at the same time as total
coliforms are sampled,  as specified in
§141.21, except  that  the State  may
allow a public water system  which uses
both a surface water source or a ground
water source under direct influence of
surface water,  and  a  ground  water
source, to take disinfectant  residual
samples at points other than the total
coliform sampling  points  if the State
determines that such points are more
representative of treated  (disinfected)
water  quality within the distribution
system. Heterotrophic  bacteria, meas-
ured as   heterotrophic  plate  count
(HPC) as specified in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section, may be measured in lieu
of residual disinfectant concentration.
  (ii) If the State determines, based on
site-specific considerations,  that a sys-
tem has no means  for having a sample
transported and analyzed for HPC  by a
certified laboratory under the requisite
time and temperature conditions speci-
fied by paragraph (a)(3) of this section
and that  the  system is providing  ade-
quate disinfection  in the distribution
system, the requirements of paragraph
(b)(6)(i) of this section  do not apply to
that system.
  (c) Monitoring  requirements  for systems
using filtration treatment. A public water
system  that uses a   surface  water
source or a ground water source under
the influence of surface water and pro-
vides filtration  treatment must  mon-
itor in accordance  with this paragraph
(c) beginning June  29, 1993, or when fil-
tration is installed, whichever is later.
  (1)  Turbidity measurements as  re-
quired by §141.73 must be performed on
representative samples of the system's
filtered  water  every four  hours  (or
more  frequently)   that the   system
serves water  to the public. A public
water system  may substitute  contin-
uous  turbidity monitoring  for  grab
sample monitoring if it validates the
continuous  measurement for accuracy
on a regular basis  using a protocol ap-
proved by the State. For any systems
using slow sand filtration or filtration
treatment  other   than  conventional
treatment,  direct  filtration, or diato-
maceous  earth filtration,   the State
may reduce the sampling frequency to
once per day if it determines that less
frequent monitoring is sufficient to in-
dicate effective filtration performance.
For systems serving 500 or  fewer per-
sons,  the State may reduce the tur-
bidity sampling frequency to once per
day, regardless of the type of filtration
treatment used, if the State  deter-
mines that less frequent monitoring is
sufficient to  indicate effective filtra-
tion performance.
  (2)  The  residual disinfectant  con-
centration of the  water entering the
distribution system must be monitored
continuously,   and  the   lowest value
must be recorded each day, except that
if there is a failure in the  continuous
monitoring  equipment,  grab sampling
every 4 hours  may  be conducted in lieu
of continuous  monitoring,  but for  no
more than  5  working  days following
the failure of the equipment, and sys-
tems serving 3,300 or fewer persons may
take grab samples  in lieu of providing
continuous  monitoring on an ongoing
basis  at  the frequencies each day pre-
scribed below:
System size by population
±500
501 to 1,000
1,001 to 2,500
2,501 to 3,300
Samples/
day1
1
2
3
4
 1 The day's samples cannot be taken at the same time The
sampling intervals are subject to State review and approval

If at any time the residual disinfectant
concentration falls below 0.2 mg/1 in a
system  using grab sampling in lieu of
continuous  monitoring,   the  system
must take a grab sample every 4 hours
                                     455

-------
§141.75
          40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
until the  residual  disinfectant  con-
centration is equal to or greater  than
0.2 mg/1.
  (3)(i)  The residual disinfectant  con-
centration must be measured at least
at the same points in the distribution
system  and at the same time as total
coliforms are sampled, as specified in
§141.21,   except  that  the  State  may
allow a public water system which uses
both a surface water source or a ground
water source  under direct influence of
surface   water,  and  a ground  water
source  to  take disinfectant residual
samples at points other than the total
coliform sampling points if the State
determines  that such points are more
representative of treated (disinfected)
water quality within the distribution
system.  Heterotrophic bacteria, meas-
ured  as  heterotrophic   plate  count
(HPC) as specified in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section, may be  measured in lieu
of residual disinfectant concentration.
  (ii) If the State determines, based on
site-specific considerations,  that a sys-
tem has no means for having a sample
transported and analyzed for HPC  by a
certified laboratory under the requisite
time and temperature conditions speci-
fied by  paragraph (a)(3) of this section
and that the system  is providing  ade-
quate disinfection in the distribution
system, the requirements of paragraph
(c)(3)(i)  of this section do not apply to
that system.
[54 PR 27527, June 29, 1989, as amended at 59
FR  62470, Dec. 5,  1994; 60 FR 34086, June 29,
1995; 64 FR 67465, Dec. 1, 1999;  67 FR  65252,
Oct. 23, 2002, 67 FR 65901, Oct. 29, 2002]
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38856, June
29, 2004,  §141.74 was  amended in paragraph
(b)(4)(ii)  by removing the citation "§142.72(a)"
and adding in its  place "§141.72(a)"; in  para-
graph (b)(6)(ii) by  removing the  citation
"(a)(3)" and  adding in its place "(a)(l)", in
paragraph (c)(3)(i) by removing the citation
"(a)(3)" and adding in its place "(a)(l)"; and m
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) by removing the citation
"(a)(3)" and adding in its place "(a)(l)",  effec-
tive July 29, 2004.

§ 141.75  Reporting  and recordkeeping
    requirements.
  (a) A  public water system  that uses a
surface  water source and does not pro-
vide filtration  treatment must  report
monthly to the State the information
specified in  this  paragraph  (a)  begin-
ning  December 31,  1990, unless  the
State has determined that filtration is
required in writing pursuant to section
1412(b)(7)(C)(iii),  in  which   case  the
State may specify alternative report-
ing requirements, as appropriate, until
filtration is  in place.  A  public  water
system that uses a ground water source
under the direct influence  of surface
water and does  not  provide  filtration
treatment must report monthly to the
State the information specified in this
paragraph (a)  beginning December 31,
1990, or 6 months after the State deter-
mines that the ground water source is
under the direct influence  of surface
water, whichever is later, unless  the
State has determined that filtration is
required  in   writing   pursuant   to
§1412(b)(7)(C)(iii), in  which  case  the
State may specify alternative report-
ing requirements, as appropriate, until
filtration is in place.
  (1) Source water quality information
must be reported to the State within 10
days after the end of each month the
system serves water to  the public. In-
formation that  must be reported in-
cludes:
  (i) The cumulative  number of months
for which results are  reported.
  (ii) The number of fecal and/or total
coliform  samples, whichever  are ana-
lyzed during  the month  (if  a system
monitors for both, only fecal coliforms
must be  reported), the dates  of sample
collection, and the dates when the tur-
bidity level exceeded 1 NTU.
  (iii) The number  of samples  during
the month that had equal  to or less
than 20/100  ml fecal coliforms  and/or
equal to  or less than 100/100  ml total
coliforms, whichever are analyzed.
  (iv) The cumulative number of fecal
or total  coliform samples,  whichever
are analyzed,  during the previous six
months the system served water to the
public.
  (v) The cumulative number of sam-
ples that had equal to or less than 20/
100 ml fecal  coliforms or equal  to or
less  than 100/100 ml total  coliforms,
whichever are analyzed, during the pre-
vious six months the  system  served
water to the public.
  (vi) The percentage of  samples that
had equal to  or less than 20/iOO ml fecal
conforms or equal to or less  than 100/
100 ml total  coliforms, whichever are
analyzed,  during   the   previous  six
                                      456

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.75
months the system served water to the
public.
  (vii) The maximum turbidity level
measured during the month, the date(s)
of occurrence for any measurement(s)
which exceeded 5 NTU, and the date(s)
the occurrence(s)  was reported  to the
State.
  (viii) For the first  12 months of rec-
ordkeeping, the dates and cumulative
number of events during which the tur-
bidity exceeded 5 NTU, and  after one
year  of  recordkeeping for  turbidity
measurements,  the  dates  and  cumu-
lative number of  events during which
the turbidity exceeded 5  NTU in the
previous 12 months the system  served
water to the public.
  (ix) For the first 120 months of rec-
ordkeeping, the dates and cumulative
number of events during which the tur-
bidity exceeded 5  NTU, and after  10
years of recordkeeping  for  turbidity
measurements,  the  dates  and  cumu-
lative number of events during which
the turbidity exceeded 5  NTU in the
previous 120 months the system  served
water to the public.
  (2) Disinfection information specified
in §141.74(b) must  be reported to the
State within 10 days after the end  of
each month the system serves water  to
the public. Information that must  be
reported includes:
  (i) For each day, the lowest measure-
ment  of  residual  disinfectant  con-
centration  in mg/1  in water entering
the distribution system.
  (ii)  The date and duration of each pe-
riod  when the residual  disinfectant
concentration  in  water  entering the
distribution system fell below 0.2 mg/1
and when the State was notified of the
occurrence.
  (iii) The  daily residual disinfectant
concentration(s)  (in  mg/1)  and  dis-
infectant contact  time(s)  (in minutes)
used for calculating the CT value(s).
  (iv) If  chlorine is  used,  the  daily
measurement(s) of  pH  of disinfected
water following each point of chlorine
disinfection.
  (v)  The  daily  measurement(s)   of
water temperature in °C following each
point of disinfection.
  (vi) The  daily CTcalc  and CTcalc/
CT999  values  for   each  disinfectant
measurement or sequence  and the sum
of  all  CTcalc/CT999 values  ((CTcalc/
CT999))  before or at the first customer.
  (vii)  The  daily  determination   of
whether disinfection achieves adequate
Giardia   cyst  and  virus  inactivation.
i.e., whether (CTcalc/CT999) is at least
1.0  or. where  disinfectants other than
chlorine are used, other indicator con-
ditions  that  the State determines are
appropriate, are met.
  (viii)  The following information  on
the samples  taken in the distribution
system  in conjunction with total coli-
form monitoring pursuant to §141.72:
  (A) Number  of instances where the
residual disinfectant concentration  is
measured;
  (B) Number  of instances where the
residual disinfectant concentration  is
not  measured  but heterotrophic bac-
teria plate count (HPC) is measured;
  (C) Number of instances where the re-
sidual  disinfectant  concentration   is
measured but not detected and no HPC
is measured;
  (D) Number  of instances where the
residual disinfectant concentration  is
detected and where HPC is >500/ml;
  (E) Number  of instances where the
residual disinfectant concentration  is
not measured and HPC is >500/ml;
  (F) For  the  current  and  previous
month the system served water to the
public, the value of "V" in the  following
formula:
              c + d + e
                      xlOO
                a + b
where:
a=the value in paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(A)  of
  this section,
b=the value in paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(B)  of
  this section,
c=the value in paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(C)  of
  this section,
d=the value in paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(D)  of
  this section, and
e=the value in paragraph (a)(2)(viii)(E)  of
  this section.

  (G) If the State determines, based on
site-specific considerations, that a sys-
tem has no means for having a sample
transported and analyzed for HPC by a
certified laboratory under the requisite
time and temperature conditions speci-
fied by §141.74(a)(3) and  that the  sys-
tem is providing adequate disinfection
in the distribution system, the require-
ments  of  paragraph (a)(2)(viii)  (A)-(F)
                                     457

-------
§141.75
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of this section do not apply to that sys-
tem.
  (ix) A system need not  report  the
data listed in paragraphs (a)(2) (i), and
(iii)-(vi) of this section if all data listed
in paragraphs (a)(2) (i)-(viii) of this sec-
tion remain on file at the system, and
the State determines that:
  (A) The  system has submitted to the
State all  the information required  by
paragraphs (a)(2) (i)-(viii) of this sec-
tion for at least 12 months; and
  (B) The State has determined that
the system is not required to provide
filtration treatment.
  (3) No later than ten  days after the
end  of  each  Federal fiscal  year (Sep-
tember 30), each system must provide
to the  State a report which summa-
rizes its compliance with all watershed
control program requirements specified
in§141.71(b)(2).
  (4) No later than ten  days after the
end  of  each  Federal fiscal  year (Sep-
tember 30), each system must provide
to the State a report on the  on-site in-
spection conducted during  that  year
pursuant to §141.71(b)(3), unless the on-
site  inspection  was conducted by  the
State.  If the  inspection  was  conducted
by the State, the State must provide a
copy of its report to the public  water
system.
  (5)(i) Bach  system, upon discovering
that a waterborne disease outbreak po-
tentially  attributable  to that  water
system has occurred, must report that
occurrence to the State as soon as pos-
sible, but no later  than by the end of
the next business day.
  (ii) If at any  time the turbidity ex-
ceeds 5 NTU, the system must consult
with the  primacy  agency as soon  as
practical,  but no later  than 24  hours
after the  exceedance is  known, in ac-
cordance with  the  public notification
requirements under §141.203(b)(3).
  (iii) If at any time the residual falls
below 0.2 mg/1 in the water entering the
distribution system, the system must
notify the State as soon as possible,
but no later than by the end of the next
business day. The system also must no-
tify  the State  by the end of the next
business day  whether or not the resid-
ual  was restored to at  least 0.2 mg/1
within 4 hours.
  (b) A public water system that uses a
surface water source or a ground water
source under  the direct influence of
surface water and provides filtration
treatment must report monthly to the
State the information specified in this
paragraph (b)  beginning June 29,  1993,
or when  filtration is installed, which-
ever is later.
  (1)  Turbidity  measurements  as re-
quired by §141.74(c)(l) must be reported
within 10 days  after the end  of  each
month the  system serves water to the
public. Information  that must be re-
ported includes:
  (i) The total number of filtered water
turbidity measurements taken  during
the month.
  (ii) The number and percentage of fil-
tered  water turbidity   measurements
taken during the month which are less
than  or  equal to  the turbidity limits
specified in §141.73  for  the filtration
technology being used.
  (iii) The  date  and value of any tur-
bidity measurements taken during the
month which exceed 5 NTU.
  (2) Disinfection information specified
in §141.74(c) must be reported to the
State within 10 days after  the end of
each month the  system  serves water to
the public.  Information that must be
reported includes:
  (i) For each day, the lowest measure-
ment  of residual  disinfectant  con-
centration  in  mg/1 in water entering
the distribution  system.
  (ii) The date and duration of each pe-
riod  when  the  residual disinfectant
concentration in  water  entering  the
distribution system fell  below  0.2  mg/1
and when the State was  notified of the
occurrence.
  (iii) The following information on the
samples  taken in the distribution sys-
tem in conjunction with total coliform
monitoring pursuant to §141.72:
  (A) Number of instances where the
residual  disinfectant concentration is
measured:
  (B) Number of instances where the
residual  disinfectant concentration is
not  measured but heterotrophic  bac-
teria plate count (HPC) is measured:
  (C) Number of instances where the re-
sidual disinfectant  concentration is
measured but not detected and no HPC
is measured;
  (D) Number of instances where no re-
sidual disinfectant concentration is de-
tected and where HPC is >500/ml;
                                     458

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                                       §141.76
  (E) Number  of  instances where  the
residual disinfectant  concentration is
not measured and HPC is >500/ml;
  (P) For the  current  and  previous
month the system serves water to the
public, the value of "V" in the following
formula:
          V =
               c + d + e
                       xlOO
                a + b

             paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A) of this

             paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B) of this

             paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(C) of this

             paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(D) of this

             paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(E) of this
where:
a=the value in
  section,
b=the value in
  section,
c=the value in
  section,
d=the value in
  section, and
e=the value in
  section.

  (G) If the State determines, based on
site-specific considerations, that a sys-
tem has no means for having a sample
transported and analyzed for HPC by a
certified  laboratory  within  the  req-
uisite time and temperature conditions
specified  by §141.74(a)(3) and that the
system is providing adequate disinfec-
tion in the distribution system, the re-
quirements of paragraph (b)(2)(iii) (A)~
(F) of this section do not apply.
  (iv)  A  system need not  report  the
data listed in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this
section if all  data listed in paragraphs
(b)(2) (i)-(iii)  of this section remain on
file at the system and the  State deter-
mines  that the system has  submitted
all the information required by para-
graphs (b)(2) (i)-(iii) of this section for
at least 12 months.
  (3)(i) Each system, upon discovering
that a waterborne disease outbreak po-
tentially  attributable to  that water
system has occurred, must report that
occurrence to the State as  soon as pos-
sible, but no  later than  by the end of
the next business day.
  (ii) If at  any time the turbidity ex-
ceeds 5 NTU,  the  system must consult
with the  primacy agency as  soon  as
practical,  but no later than 24 hours
after the exceedance  is known, in ac-
cordance  with the public  notification
requirements  under §141.203(b)(3).
  (iii) If at any time the residual  falls
below 0.2 mg/1 in the water entering the
distribution system,  the system must
notify  the  State  as  soon  as possible,
but no later than by the end of the next
business day. The system also must no-
tify  the State by the  end of the next
business day whether or not the resid-
ual  was restored to at least 0.2 mg/1
within 4 hours.
[54 FR 27527, June 29, 1989, as amended at 65
FR 26022, May 4, 2000]
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38856, June
29, 2004, §141.75 was amended in paragraph
(a)(2)(viii)(G)  by  removing   the  citation
"§141.74(a)(3)"  and  adding   in  its  place
"§141.74(a)(l)", and in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(G)
by removing the citation "§141.74(a)(3)" and
adding in its  place "§141.74(a)(D",  effective
July 29, 2004.

§ 141.76  Recycle provisions.
  (a) Applicability.  All subpart  H sys-
tems that  employ conventional filtra-
tion or direct filtration treatment and
that recycle  spent  filter  backwash
water,  thickener  supernatant,  or liq-
uids  from  dewatering processes must
meet the requirements in paragraphs
(b) through (d) of this section.
  (b) Reporting.  A system must notify
the  State  in writing  by Decemeber 8,
2003, if the system recycles spent filter
backwash  water,  thickener   super-
natant,  or  liquids  from dewatering
processes.  This notification must in-
clude, at a minimum,  the information
specified in paragraphs (b)(l) and (2) of
this  section.
  (1) A plant  schematic showing the or-
igin  of all flows which are recycled (in-
cluding, but not limited to, spent filter
backwash  water,  thickener   super-
natant,  and  liquids from dewatering
processes), the  hydraulic  conveyance
used to transport them, and the loca-
tion where they are re-introduced back
into the treatment plant.
  (2) Typical  recycle flow in gallons per
minute  (gpm),  the  highest observed
plant flow experienced in  the previous
year (gpm), design flow for the treat-
ment plant (gpm), and State-approved
operating capacity for the plant where
the  State  has made  such determina-
tions.
  (c) Treatment technique  requirement.
Any system  that  recycles spent filter
backwash  water,  thickener   super-
natant,  or  liquids  from  dewatering
processes  must   return  these  flows
through the processes of a system's ex-
isting conventional or  direct filtration
                                     459

-------
§141.80
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
system as defined in §141.2 or at an al-
ternate location approved "by the State
by  June  8, 2004.  If  capital  improve-
ments are required to modify the recy-
cle  location to meet this requirement,
all capital improvements must be com-
pleted no later than June 8, 2006.
  (d)  Recordkeeping. The system must
collect and retain on file recycle flow
information  specified  in  paragraphs
(d)(l) through (6) of this section for re-
view  and  evaluation by the State be-
ginning June 8, 2004.
  (1)  Copy of the recycle  notification
and   information   submitted  to   the
State under paragraph  (b) of this  sec-
tion.
  (2) List  of  all recycle flows and the
frequency  with  which  they  are  re-
turned.
  (3) Average  and maximum backwash
flow rate  through  the  filters  and the
average and maximum  duration of the
filter backwash process  in minutes.
  (4)  Typical  filter run length and  a
written summary  of  how filter  run
length is determined.
  (5)  The  type of treatment provided
for the recycle flow.
  (6) Data on the physical  dimensions
of the equalization and/or treatment
units, typical and maximum hydraulic
loading rates, type of treatment chemi-
cals used and average  dose  and  fre-
quency of use, and frequency at which
solids are removed, if applicable.
[66 FR 31103, June 8, 2001]

  Subpart I—Control of Lead and
              Copper

  SOURCE: 56 FR 26548, June 7, 1991, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 141.80  General requirements.
  (a) Applicability and effective dates. (1)
The requirements of this subpart I con-
stitute the national primary drinking
water regulations for lead and copper.
Unless otherwise indicated,  each of the
provisions  of this  subpart applies to
community  water  systems  and  non-
transient, non-community  water  sys-
tems  (hereinafter referred to as "water
systems" or "systems").
  (2)  The. requirements set  forth in
§§141.86 to 141.91 shall  take effect on
July 7, 1991. The requirements set forth
in §§141.80 to 141.85 shall take effect on
December 7, 1992.
  (b) Scope. These regulations establish
a treatment technique that includes re-
quirements for corrosion control treat-
ment,  source  water  treatment, lead
service  line  replacement, and  public
education.   These   requirements  are
triggered, in some cases, by lead  and
copper action levels measured in sam-
ples collected at consumers' taps.
  (c) Lead and copper action levels.  (1)
The lead action level is exceeded if the
concentration of lead in more than 10
percent of tap water samples collected
during  any  monitoring  period  con-
ducted  in accordance with  §141.86 is
greater than 0.015  mg/L (i.e., if  the
"90th percentile" lead level  is greater
than 0.015 mg/L).
  (2) The copper action level is exceed-
ed  if the concentration  of  copper in
more than 10 percent of tap water sam-
ples collected  during any monitoring
period  conducted  in accordance with
§141.86 is greater than 1.3 mg/L (i.e.. if
the "90th percentile" copper  level is
greater than  1.3 mg/L).
  (3) The 90th percentile lead and cop-
per levels shall be computed as follows:
  (i) The results of all lead  or copper
samples taken during a monitoring pe-
riod shall be placed in ascending order
from the sample with the lowest con-
centration to the sample with the high-
est concentration.  Bach  sampling  re-
sult shall be assigned a number,   as-
cending by  single  integers  beginning
with the number 1 for the sample with
the  lowest   contaminant level. The
number assigned to the  sample with
the highest contaminant level shall be
equal to the total  number of samples
taken.
  (ii)  The  number  of samples  taken
during the monitoring period  shall be
multiplied by 0.9.
  (iii) The contaminant  concentration
in the numbered sample yielded by the
calculation in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) is the
90th percentile contaminant level.
  (iv) For water systems serving fewer
than 100 people that collect  5 samples
per monitoring period,  the  90th per-
centile is computed by taking the aver-
age of the highest  and second highest
concentrations.
                                     460

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.81
  (d) Corrosion control treatment require-
ments.  (1) All water systems shall  in-
stall  and  operate optimal corrosion
control treatment as defined in §141.2.
  (2) Any water system that complies
with the applicable corrosion  control
treatment requirements specified  by
the State under §§141.81 and 141.82 shall
be  deemed  in  compliance  with the
treatment requirement  contained  in
paragraph (d)(l) of this section.
  (e)  Source  water  treatment   require-
ments.  Any  system exceeding the lead
or copper action level shall implement
all applicable source water  treatment
requirements specified  by  the State
under §141.83.
  (f) Lead service line  replacement  re-
quirements. Any system exceeding the
lead action level after implementation
of  applicable  corrosion control  and
source water treatment requirements
shall complete the lead service  line  re-
placement requirements contained in
§141.84.
  (g) Public education requirements. Any
system exceeding the lead action level
shall  implement  the public education
requirements contained in §141.85.
  (h) Monitoring and analytical  require-
ments.  Tap  water  monitoring for lead
and copper, monitoring' for water  qual-
ity parameters,  source  water moni-
toring for lead and copper, and  anal-
yses of  the  monitoring results under
this subpart shall be completed in com-
pliance with §§141.86, 141.87,  141.88, and
141.89.
  (i) Reporting  requirements. Systems
shall report to the State any informa-
tion required by the treatment provi-
sions of this subpart and §141.90.
  (j) Recordkeeping  requirements.  Sys-
tems shall maintain records in  accord-
ance with §141.91.
  (k) Violation of national primary drink-
ing water regulations. Failure to  comply
with  the applicable  requirements  of
§§141.80-141.91,  including requirements
established  by the State pursuant to
these provisions, shall constitute a vio-
lation  of the national primary drinking
water  regulations for lead and/or cop-
per.

[56 FR  26548, June 7, 1991; 57 FR 28788, June
29, 1992]
§ 141.81  Applicability of corrosion con-
    trol treatment  steps to small, me-
    dium-size and large water systems.
  (a) Systems shall complete the appli-
cable corrosion control treatment  re-
quirements described in §141.82 by the
deadlines established in this section.
  (1) A large system (serving- >50,000
persons) shall  complete the corrosion
control treatment  steps  specified in
paragraph  (d) of this section, unless it
is  deemed  to have  optimized corrosion
control under paragraph (b)(2)  or (b)(3)
of this section.
  (2) A small system (serving <3300 per-
sons) and a medium-size system (serv-
ing  >3,300  and  <50,000 persons)  shall
complete the corrosion control  treat-
ment steps specified in paragraph (e) of
this section,  unless it  is deemed to
have optimized corrosion control under
paragraph  (b)(l), (b)(2), or  (b)(3) of this
section.
  (b) A system is deemed to  have opti-
mized  corrosion control and is not  re-
quired to complete the applicable cor-
rosion control treatment  steps identi-
fied in this section if the system satis-
fies  one of  the criteria  specified in
paragraphs (b)(l) through  (b)(3) of this
section.  Any  such system deemed to
have optimized corrosion control under
this paragraph, and which has  treat-
ment in place, shall continue  to  oper-
ate  and maintain  optimal  corrosion
control treatment and  meet  any  re-
quirements that the State determines
appropriate to  ensure  optimal  corro-
sion control treatment is maintained.
  (1) A small or medium-size  water sys-
tem is deemed to have optimized corro-
sion control if  the system meets the
lead and copper action levels during
each  of two  consecutive  six-month
monitoring periods conducted in ac-
cordance with §141.86.
  (2) Any water system may be deemed
by the State to have optimized  corro-
sion control treatment  if the system
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
State that it  has  conducted activities
equivalent   to  the  corrosion  control
steps applicable to such system under
this section. If the State makes this
determination, it shall provide the sys-
tem with written notice explaining the
basis for its decision and shall specify
the water  quality  control parameters
representing optimal corrosion control
                                     461

-------
§141.81
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
in accordance with  §141.82(f).  Water
systems deemed to have optimized cor-
rosion control  under  this paragraph
shall  operate in compliance with  the
State-designated optimal water quality
control parameters in accordance with
§141.82(g) and continue to conduct lead
and copper  tap  and water quality pa-
rameter sampling- in accordance with
§141.86(d)(3)  and §141.87(d). respectively.
A system  shall provide the State with
the following information in order to
support a  determination  under  this
paragraph:
  (i) The results of all test samples col-
lected for  each of the water quality pa-
rameters in  § 141.82(c)(3).
  (ii)  A   report  explaining the  test
methods used by the water system to
evaluate the  corrosion control treat-
ments listed in §141.82(c)(l), the results
of all tests conducted, and the basis for
the system's selection  of optimal cor-
rosion control treatment;
  (iii) A report  explaining how corro-
sion control has been installed and how
it is  being maintained to insure mini-
mal lead and  copper  concentrations at
consumers' taps; and
  (iv) The results of tap water samples
collected in accordance with §141.86 at
least  once  eve  /  six months for  one
year after corrosion  control has been
installed.
  (3)  Any  water system is deemed to
have optimized  corrosion control if it
submits results  of   tap water  moni-
toring conducted  in accordance with
§141.86 and  source  water monitoring
conducted in accordance with  §141.88
that  demonstrates for two consecutive
6-month monitoring-  periods that  the
difference between the 90th percentile
tap water lead  level  computed  under
§141.80(c)(3).  and  the  highest  source
water lead  concentration is less than
the Practical Quantitation  Level for
lead specified in §141.89(a)(l)(ii).
  (i)   Those  systems  whose  highest
source water lead level is below  the
Method Detection Limit  may  also  be
deemed to  have  optimized corrosion
control under this paragraph if the 90th
percentile tap water lead level  is less
than or equal to  the Practical Quan-
titation Level for lead for two consecu-
tive 6-month monitoring periods.
  (ii) Any  water system deemed to have
optimized corrosion control in accord-
ance  with this paragraph  shall  con-
tinue monitoring for lead and copper at
the tap no  less frequently than  once
every three calendar years using the
reduced number  of sites specified in
§141.86(c) and collecting the samples at
times   and  locations  specified  in
§141.86(d)(4)(iv). Any such system that
has not  conducted a  round of moni-
toring pursuant to §141.86(d) since Sep-
tember 30. 1997, shall complete a round
of monitoring  pursuant to this  para-
graph no later than September 30, 2000.
  (iii) Any  water  system deemed  to
have  optimized corrosion control pur-
suant to  this  paragraph shall notify
the  State  in  writing  pursuant  to
§141.90(a)(3) of any change in treatment
or the addition of a new source. The
State may require any such system to
conduct  additional monitoring or  to
take other action  the State deems ap-
propriate to ensure that such  systems
maintain  minimal  levels of corrosion
in the distribution system.
  (iv) As of July 12, 2001, a system is
not deemed to have  optimized corro-
sion control under this paragraph, and
shall  implement   corrosion   control
treatment   pursuant   to   paragraph
(b)(3)(v) of this section unless it meets
the copper action level.
  (v) Any system triggered into corro-
sion control because  it is no longer
deemed  to  have  optimized  corrosion
control  under this paragraph shall im-
plement corrosion  control treatment in
accordance with the deadlines  in para-
graph (e) of  this  section.  Any  such
large system shall adhere to the sched-
ule specified in that paragraph for me-
dium-size systems,  with  the time  peri-
ods  for  completing each step  being
triggered by the date the system  is no
longer deemed to have optimized corro-
sion control under this paragraph.
  (c) Any small or medium-size water
system that is required to complete the
corrosion control  steps due to its ex-
ceedance of the lead or copper action
level  may cease completing the treat-
ment steps whenever the system meets
both action levels  during each of two
consecutive monitoring periods  con-
ducted pursuant to §141.86 and submits
the results  to  the State. If any  such
water system  thereafter exceeds the
lead or  copper  action level during any
monitoring period, the system (or the
                                     462

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.81
State, as the case may "be) shall recom-
mence  completion  of the  applicable
treatment steps,  beginning  with the
first treatment step which was not pre-
viously completed in  its entirety. The
State may require a system to  repeat
treatment steps previously completed
by  the  system where  the State deter-
mines that this is necessary to  imple-
ment properly the treatment require-
ments of this section. The State shall
notify the system in writing of  such a
determination and explain the basis for
its  decision. The  requirement for any
small- or medium-size system to imple-
ment corrosion control treatment steps
in  accordance with  paragraph  (e)  of
this section (including systems deemed
to  have  optimized  corrosion control
under paragraph (b)(l) of this section)
is triggered whenever any small-  or
medium-size system exceeds the  lead
or copper action level.
  (d)  Treatment steps and deadlines for
large  systems.  Except as provided  in
paragraph (b) (2) and (3) of this section,
large systems shall complete the fol-
lowing   corrosion  control  treatment
steps (described in the referenced por-
tions of §§141.82,  141.86,  and 141.87) by
the indicated dates.
  (1) Step 1:  The system  shall conduct
initial  monitoring  (§141.86(d)(l)  and
§141.87(b)) during  two consecutive six-
month monitoring periods by January
1, 1993.
  (2) Step 2: The system shall complete
corrosion control  studies (§141.82(c)) by
July 1, 1994.
  (3) Step 3: The State shall designate
optimal  corrosion control  treatment
(§141.82(d)) by January 1, 1995.
  (4) Step 4: The system shall install op-
timal   corrosion  control   treatment
(§141.82(e)) by January 1, 1997.
  (5) Step 5: The system shall complete
follow-up sampling  (§141.86(d)(2)  and
§141.87(0)) by January 1, 1998.
  (6) Step 6: The State shall review in-
stallation of treatment  and designate
optimal  water quality control param-
eters (§141.82(f)) by July 1, 1998.
  (7) Step 7: The system shall operate in
compliance with the State-specified op-
timal water quality control parameters
(§141.82(g)) and continue to conduct tap
sampling (§141.86(d)(3)  and §141.87(d)).
  (e) Treatment Steps and deadlines for
small and medium-size systems. Except  as
provided in paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion,  small and medium-size systems
shall  complete the following corrosion
control treatment steps (described  in
the  referenced  portions  of  §§141.82,
141.86 and 141.87) by the indicated time
periods.
  (1) Step 1: The system shall conduct
initial tap  sampling  (§141.86(d)(l) and
§141.87(b)) until the system either  ex-
ceeds the lead or copper action level or
becomes  eligible  for  reduced  moni-
toring under §141.86(d)(4). A system  ex-
ceeding the lead or copper action level
shall   recommend optimal   corrosion
control  treatment  (§141.82(a))  within
six months  after it exceeds  one of the
action levels.
  (2) Step 2: Within 12 months  after a
system exceeds the lead or  copper  ac-
tion level, the State  may require the
system to  perform corrosion  control
studies (§141.8203)). If the  State does
not require the system to perform such
studies, the State shall specify optimal
corrosion control treatment (§ 141.82(d))
within the following timeframes:
  (i) For medium-size systems, within
18 months after such  system exceeds
the lead or copper action level,
  (ii)  For  small  systems,  within   24
months after such system exceeds the
lead or copper action level.
  (3) Step 3:  If the State requires a sys-
tem to perform corrosion control stud-
ies under step 2, the system  shall com-
plete  the studies  (§141.82(c)) within  18
months after the  State requires that
such studies be conducted.
  (4)  Step 4. If  the  system has per-
formed corrosion control studies under
step 2, the State  shall designate opti-
mal   corrosion   control    treatment
(§141.82(d)) within 6 months after com-
pletion of step 3.
  (5) Step 5: The system shall install op-
timal  corrosion   control   treatment
(§141.82(e)) within 24 months after the
State designates such treatment.
  (6) Step 6:  The system shall complete
follow-up sampling (§141.86(d)(2) and
§141.87(c)) within  36 months  after the
State  designates  optimal   corrosion
control treatment.
  (7) Step 7:  The State shall review the
system's installation of treatment and
designate optimal water quality con-
trol  parameters  (§141.82(f))  within 6
months after completion of step 6.
                                     463

-------
§141.82
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (8) Step 8: The system shall operate in
compliance  with the State-designated
optimal water quality control param-
eters (§141.82(g))  and continue to con-
duct  tap sampling  (§141.86(d)(3)  and
§141.87(d)).

[56 FR 26548, June 7, 1991, as amended at 59
FR 33862. June 30, 1994; 65 FR 2004, Jan. 12,
2000]

§ 141.82 Description  of corrosion con-
   trol treatment requirements.

  Each system shall complete  the cor-
rosion control treatment requirements
described below which are applicable to
such system under §141.81.
  (a)  System recommendation regarding
corrosion control treatment. Based upon
the results of lead and copper tap mon-
itoring  and water quality parameter
monitoring,  small  and  medium-size
water  systems exceeding the  lead or
copper action level  shall recommend
installation of one or more of  the cor-
rosion control  treatments  listed  in
paragraph (c)(l) of this  section which
the system believes constitutes opti-
mal corrosion control for that system.
The  State may  require the system to
conduct  additional  water quality  pa-
rameter monitoring in accordance with
§141.87(b) to assist the State in review-
ing the system's recommendation.
  (b) State decision to require studies of
corrosion control treatment (applicable to
small  and  medium-size  systems).  The
State may  require  any small or me-
dium-size system that exceeds  the lead
or copper action level to perform corro-
sion  control studies under  paragraph
(c) of this section to identify  optimal
corrosion control  treatment  for  the
system.
  (c)  Performance of corrosion  control
studies.  (1)  Any  public  water system
performing  corrosion control studies
shall evaluate the effectiveness of each
of the following treatments, and, if ap-
propriate,  combinations of  the  fol-
lowing treatments to identify the opti-
mal  corrosion control treatment  for
that system:
  (i)  Alkalinity and pH adjustment;
  (ii) Calcium  hardness  adjustment;
and
  (iiD The addition of a phosphate or
silicate based corrosion  inhibitor at a
concentration sufficient  to maintain
an effective residual concentration in
all test tap samples.
  (2) The  water system shall evaluate
each  of  the corrosion control  treat-
ments using either pipe rig/loop tests,
metal  coupon  tests,  partial-system
tests, or analyses based on documented
analogous treatments with other sys-
tems  of similar size, water chemistry
and distribution system configuration.
  (3) The  water system  shall measure
the following water quality parameters
in any tests conducted under this para-
graph before and after evaluating the
corrosion   control   treatments   listed
above:
  (i) Lead;
  (ii) Copper;
  (iii) pH;
  (iv) Alkalinity;
  (v) Calcium;
  (vi) Conductivity;
  (vii) Orthophosphate (when an inhib-
itor containing a phosphate compound
is used);
  (viii) Silicate (when an inhibitor con-
taining a silicate compound is used);
  (ix) Water temperature.
  (4) The  water system shall identify
all  chemical  or physical constraints
that limit or prohibit the use of a par-
ticular  corrosion  control treatment
and document such constraints with at
least one of the following:
  (i) Data and documentation showing
that  a particular  corrosion  control
treatment has adversely affected other
water  treatment processes when used
by  another water  system with com-
parable water quality characteristics;
and/or
  (ii)  Data  and  documentation dem-
onstrating that the water system has
previously  attempted  to evaluate  a
particular corrosion control treatment
and has found that the treatment is in-
effective  or adversely  affects  other
water quality treatment processes.
  (5) The  water system shall evaluate
the effect of the chemicals used for cor-
rosion  control  treatment  on  other
water quality treatment processes.
  (6) On the basis of an analysis of the
data generated during each evaluation,
the water system shall recommend to
the State in writing the treatment op-
tion that  the corrosion control  studies
indicate constitutes optimal corrosion
control treatment for that system. The
                                     464

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.82
water system shall provide a rationale
for its recommendation along with all
supporting- documentation specified in
paragraphs  (c) (1)  through (5)  of  this
section.
  (d) State designation of optimal corro-
sion control treatment.  (1) Based upon
consideration of available information
including,  where   applicable,  studies
performed  under paragraph (c) of  this
section and  a system's  recommended
treatment  alternative,  the State shall
either  approve  the corrosion  control
treatment  option recommended by the
system, or designate alternative corro-
sion control treatment(s) from among
those listed in paragraph (c)(l) of  this
section.  When  designating  optimal
treatment  the State shall consider the
effects that  additional  corrosion con-
trol treatment will have on water qual-
ity parameters and  on other water
quality treatment processes.
  (2) The State shall notify the system
of  its  decision on optimal  corrosion
control treatment in writing and ex-
plain the basis for this determination.
If the  State requests additional infor-
mation to aid its review, the water  sys-
tem shall provide the  information.
  (e)  Installation  of  optimal  corrosion
control. Bach system  shall properly in-
stall and operate throughout its  dis-
tribution system the  optimal corrosion
control treatment designated  by  the
State under paragraph (d) of this  sec-
tion.
  (f) State review of treatment and speci-
fication of  optimal  water quality control
parameters.  The State  shall evaluate
the results  of all  lead  and copper tap
samples and water quality parameter
samples submitted by the water system
and determine whether the system has
properly installed  and operated the op-
timal corrosion control treatment  des-
ignated by the State in paragraph (d)
of this section. Upon  reviewing the re-
sults of tap water and water  quality
parameter  monitoring  by the system,
both before and after  the system in-
stalls optimal corrosion control treat-
ment, the State shall  designate:
  (1) A minimum  value or a range of
values for  pH measured at each entry
point to the distribution system;
  (2) A minimum pH value, measured in
all tap samples. Such  value shall be
equal to or greater than 7.0, unless the
State determines that meeting a pH
level of 7.0 is not technologically fea-
sible or is not necessary for the system
to optimize corrosion control;
  (3) If a corrosion inhibitor is used, a
minimum concentration or a range of
concentrations for the inhibitor, meas-
ured  at each entry point to  the dis-
tribution  system and in  all tap sam-
ples, that the State determines is nec-
essary to form a passivating  film  on
the interior  walls  of the pipes of the
distribution system;
  (4) If alkalinity is adjusted as part of
optimal corrosion control treatment, a
minimum concentration or a range of
concentrations  for  alkalinity,  meas-
ured  at each entry point to  the dis-
tribution  system and in  all tap sam-
ples;
  (5) If calcium carbonate stabilization
is used  as part of corrosion control, a
minimum concentration or a range of
concentrations for calcium, measured
in all tap samples.
The  values  for the applicable  water
quality   control   parameters   listed
above shall be  those that  the State de-
termines to  reflect optimal corrosion
control  treatment for the system. The
State may designate  values for addi-
tional water quality control   param-
eters determined by the  State  to re-
flect optimal corrosion control for the
system. The  State shall notify  the sys-
tem  in writing of these determinations
and explain the basis for  its decisions.
  (gO  Continued  operation  and  moni-
toring. All systems optimizing  corro-
sion control  shall continue to  operate
and  maintain  optimal corrosion con-
trol  treatment, including maintaining
water quality  parameters at or above
minimum values or within ranges des-
ignated by the State under  paragraph
(f) of this section,  in  accordance with
this paragraph for all samples collected
under §141.87(d)  through (f).  Compli-
ance  with the requirements  of this
paragraph  shall  be determined every
six   months,   as   specified    under
§141.87(d). A water system  is  out  of
compliance  with the  requirements  of
this paragraph for a six-month period if
it has excursions for any State-speci-
fied parameter on more than nine days
during the period. An excursion occurs
whenever  the  daily value for  one  or
more of the  water  quality parameters
                                     465

-------
§141.83
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
measured at  a sampling location is
below  the  minimum value or outside
the  range designated  by the State.
Daily values are calculated as follows.
States have discretion to delete results
of obvious sampling errors  from this
calculation.
  (1) On  days when  more  than  one
measurement for the water quality pa-
rameter is collected at the sampling lo-
cation, the daily value shall  be the av-
erage of all results collected during the
day regardless of whether they are col-
lected  through continuous monitoring,
grab sampling,  or  a combination of
both. If  EPA has  approved an  alter-
native formula under  §142.16 of this
chapter in the State's application for a
program  revision  submitted  pursuant
to §142.12 of this chapter, the State's
formula  shall  be  used to  aggregate
multiple   measurements  taken  at  a
sampling  point for  the water quality
parameter in lieu of the formula in this
paragraph.
  (2) On days when only one measure-
ment for the water quality parameter
is collected at the sampling location,
the daily value shall be  the result of
that measurement.
  (3) On days when no measurement is
collected for the water quality param-
eter at the sampling location, the daily
value  shall  be the  daily  value cal-
culated on  the most  recent day  on
which  the water quality parameter was
measured at the sample site.
  (h) Modification of State treatment de-
cisions. Upon its own initiative or in re-
sponse to a request by a water system
or other interested party, a State may
modify its determination  of  the  opti-
mal corrosion control treatment under
paragraph (d"> of this section or optimal
water  quality  control   parameters
under  paragraph (f) of this section. A
request for modification by a system or
other interested party shall be in writ-
ing, explain why  the modification is
appropriate,  and  provide  supporting
documentation. The State may modify
its determination where  it  concludes
that such change is necessary to ensure
that the  system continues to optimize
corrosion control treatment. A revised
determination  shall be made  in writ-
ing, set  forth  the  new treatment re-
quirements, explain  the basis for the
State's decision, and provide an imple-
mentation schedule for completing the
treatment modifications.
  (i) Treatment decisions by EPA in lieu
of the State. Pursuant to the procedures
in §142.19, the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator may  review  treatment deter-
minations made by a  State under para-
graphs (d), (f), or (h) of this section and
issue federal  treatment determinations
consistent with  the  requirements of
those paragraphs  where the Regional
Administrator finds that:
  (1) A State  has failed to issue a treat-
ment determination by the applicable
deadlines contained in §141.81,
  (2) A State has abused its discretion
in a substantial number of  cases or in
cases  affecting  a substantial popu-
lation, or
  (3) The technical aspects of a State's
determination would  be indefensible in
an  expected  Federal enforcement ac-
tion taken against a system.

[56 FB 26548, June 7, 1991. as amended at 65
FR 2004, Jan. 12, 2000]

§ 141.83  Source water treatment re-
    quirements.
  Systems shall complete the  applica-
ble source water monitoring and treat-
ment requirements  (described  in the
referenced portions of paragraph (b) of
this section,  and in §§141.86, and 141.88)
by the following deadlines.
  (a)  Deadlines  for  completing source
water treatment steps—(1) Step 1: A sys-
tem  exceeding the  lead  or  copper
action level  shall  complete lead  and
copper   source   water   monitoring
(§141.88(b))  and  make  a  treatment
recommendation   to    the    State
(§141.83(b)(l)) within 6 months after ex-
ceeding the lead or copper action level.
  (2) Step 2:  The  State  shall  make  a
determination  regarding source water
treatment   (§141.83(b)(2))   within   6
months after submission of monitoring
results under step 1.
  (3) Step 3: If the State requires instal-
lation of source water treatment, the
system   shall  install  the  treatment
(§141.83(b)(3))  within  24 months  after
completion of step 2.
  (4) Step 4' The system shall complete
follow-up   tap   water   monitoring
(§141.86(d)(2)  and  source  water moni-
toring  (§141.88(c))  within  36  months
after completion of step 2.
                                     466

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.83
  (5) Step 5: The State shall review the
system's Installation and operation of
source  water  treatment  and  specify
maximum  permissible  source  water
levels  (§141.83(b)(4)) within  6 months
after completion of step 4.
  (6) Step 6: The system shall operate in
compliance  with   the  State-specified
maximum permissible lead and copper
source  water levels (§141.83(b)(4))  and
continue   source   water  monitoring
(§141.88(d)).
  (b) Description of source water treat-
ment requirements—(1)  System treatment
recommendation. Any system which ex-
ceeds the  lead or  copper action level
shall recommend  in  writing  to  the
State the installation  and operation of
one  of the  source  water treatments
listed  in  paragraph (b)(2) of this sec-
tion. A system may recommend that
no treatment be installed based upon a
demonstration that source water treat-
ment is not necessary to minimize lead
and copper levels at users' taps.
  (2) State determination regarding source
water treatment. The State shall com-
plete an evaluation of the results of all
source water samples submitted by the
water  system  to  determine  whether
source water treatment is necessary to
minimize lead or copper levels in water
delivered to users' taps. If the State de-
termines that treatment is needed, the
State shall either require installation
and  operation of the  source  water
treatment recommended by the system
(if any) or require the installation and
operation  of  another  source  water
treatment from among  the  following:
Ion  exchange, reverse  osmosis,  lime
softening or coagulation/filtration. If
the State requests additional informa-
tion to aid in its review, the  water sys-
tem  shall  provide  the information by
the date specified by  the State in its
request. The State shall notify the sys-
tem in writing of its determination and
set forth the basis for its decision.
  (3) Installation of source water treat-
ment. Each system  shall  properly in-
stall  and  operate the  source  water
treatment  designated  by  the  State
under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
  (4) State review of source water treat-
ment and specification  of maximum per-
missible source  water levels. The State
shall review the source water samples
taken by the water system both before
and  after  the  system  installs source
water treatment, and determine wheth-
er the  system has  properly  installed
and  operated the source water treat-
ment designated by  the State. Based
upon its review, the State shall des-
ignate the maximum permissible lead
and  copper concentrations for finished
water entering the distribution system.
Such levels shall reflect the  contami-
nant removal capability of the treat-
ment  properly  operated and  main-
tained.  The State shall notify the sys-
tem  in writing and explain the basis for
its decision.
  (5) Continued  operation and  mainte-
nance.  Each  water system shall main-
tain lead and copper levels below the
maximum  permissible  concentrations
designated by the State  at each sam-
pling point  monitored  in accordance
with §141.88.  The system is out of com-
pliance with  this paragraph if the level
of lead or copper at any sampling point
is greater  than  the  maximum permis-
sible concentration  designated by the
State.
  (6) Modification of State treatment deci-
sions. Upon its own initiative or in re-
sponse to a request by a  water system
or other interested party, a State may
modify its  determination of the source
water treatment under paragraph (b)(2)
of this section, or maximum permis-
sible lead  and  copper  concentrations
for   finished  water  entering  the dis-
tribution system under paragraph (b)(4)
of this section. A request for modifica-
tion by  a  system or other interested
party shall be in writing, explain why
the  modification  is  appropriate, and
provide supporting documentation. The
State  may modify  its  determination
where it concludes that such change is
necessary  to ensure  that the  system
continues to  minimize lead and copper
concentrations in source water. A re-
vised determination shall be made in
writing, set  forth the new treatment
requirements, explain the basis for the
State's decision, and provide an imple-
mentation  schedule for completing the
treatment modifications.
  (7) Treatment decisions by EPA in lieu
of the State. Pursuant to the procedures
in §142.19,  the EPA Regional  Adminis-
trator  may  review  treatment  deter-
minations made by a State under para-
graphs (b) (2), (4), or (6) of this section
                                     467

-------
§141.84
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
and  issue  Federal  treatment  deter-
minations consistent with the require-
ments of those paragraphs where the
Administrator finds that:
  (i) A State has failed to issue a treat-
ment determination by  the applicable
deadlines contained in §141.83(a),
  (ii) A state has abused its discretion
in a substantial number of cases or in
cases  affecting  a  substantial  popu-
lation, or
  (iii)  The  technical   aspects   of  a
State's determination would  be  inde-
fensible in an expected Federal enforce-
ment action taken against a system.

§ 141.84  Lead service line replacement
    requirements.
  (a) Systems that fail to meet the lead
action level in tap samples taken pur-
suant  to §141.86(d)(2), after installing
corrosion control  and/or source water
treatment (whichever sampling occurs
later), shall replace lead service lines
in accordance with the requirements of
this section. If a system is in  violation
of §141.81 or §141.83 for failure  to install
source  water  or  corrosion  control
treatment,  the State may require the
system to commence lead service line
replacement under this  section  after
the date by which the system was re-
quired  to conduct  monitoring  under
§141.86(d)(2) has passed.
  (b) A water system shall replace an-
nually at least 1 percent of the initial
number of lead service lines in its dis-
tribution system. The initial number of
lead service lines is the number of lead
lines in place at the  time the replace-
ment program begins. The system shall
identify  the initial  number  of lead
service lines in its distribution system,
including an identification of the por-
tion(s) owned by the system,  based on
a  materials evaluation, including the
evaluation  required  under  §141.86(a)
and  relevant legal   authorities  (e.g.,
contracts, local ordinances) regarding
the portion owned by the system. The
first year of lead  service line replace-
ment shall begin on the date the action
level was exceeded in tap sampling ref-
erenced  in  paragraph (a) of  this sec-
tion.
  (c) A system is not required  to re-
place an individual lead service line  if
the  lead  concentration  in all  service
line samples from that line, taken pur-
suant to  §141.86(b)(3), is less  than or
equal to 0.015 mg/L.
  (d) A water system shall replace that
portion of the lead service line that it
owns. In cases where the system does
not own the entire  lead service line,
the system shall  notify the owner of
the  line,  or  the  owner's  authorized
agent, that the system will replace the
portion of the service line that it owns
and shall  offer to replace the owner's
portion of the line. A system is not re-
quired to bear the cost of replacing the
privately-owned portion of the  line, nor
is it required to replace the  privately-
owned portion where the owner chooses
not to pay the cost of replacing the pri-
vately-owned  portion of the  line, or
where replacing  the privately-owned
portion would  be precluded  by  State,
local  or common law. A water system
that does  not replace the entire length
of the service line also shall complete
the following tasks.
  (1)  At  least  45  days prior  to com-
mencing with the partial replacement
of a lead service line, the water system
shall  provide notice  to the resident(s)
of all buildings served by  the  line ex-
plaining that they  may experience  a
temporary increase  of lead levels in
their  drinking water, along with guid-
ance on measures consumers can take
to minimize their exposure to lead. The
State may allow the water system to
provide notice under the previous sen-
tence less than 45 days prior  to com-
mencing partial  lead service  line re-
placement where  such  replacement is
in conjunction with emergency repairs.
In addition, the water system  shall in-
form  the resident(s) served by  the  line
that the system will, at the system's
expense,  collect  a sample from each
partially-replaced  lead  service  line
that is representative of the water in
the service line for analysis  of lead
content,     as    prescribed     under
§141.86(b)(3), within 72 hours after the
completion of the partial replacement
of the service  line. The system shall
collect the sample and  report the re-
sults  of the analysis to the owner and
the resident(s) served by the line with-
in three business days of receiving the
results. Mailed  notices post-marked
within three business days of receiving
the  results shall  be considered  "on
time."
                                     468

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.85
  (2) The water  system shall provide
the information required by paragraph
(d)(l) of this section to the residents of
individual  dwellings by mail  or by
other methods approved by the State.
In instances where multi-family dwell-
ings are  served by the line, the water
system shall have the  option to  post
the information at a conspicuous loca-
tion.
  (e) The State shall require  a system
to replace lead service lines on a short-
er schedule than that required by this
section,  taking into account the num-
ber of lead service lines in the system,
where  such   a  shorter  replacement
schedule is feasible. The  State shall
make  this  determination  in writing
and  notify the system  of  its finding
within 6 months  after the system is
triggered into lead service line replace-
ment based on monitoring referenced
in paragraph (a) of this section.
  (f) Any system  may cease replacing
lead service lines whenever first draw
samples    collected    pursuant    to
§ 141.86(b)(2) meet  the lead action level
during each of two consecutive moni-
toring  periods  and the system submits
the results to  the State. If first draw
tap samples collected in any such sys-
tem thereafter exceeds the lead action
level, the system shall recommence re-
placing lead service lines  pursuant to
paragraph (b) of this section.
  (g) To  demonstrate compliance with
paragraphs (a) through (d) of this sec-
tion, a system shall report to the State
the information specified in §141.90(e).
[56 FR 26548, June 7, 1991; 57 FR 28788, June
29, 1992, as amended at 65 FR 2005, Jan. 12,
2000]

§ 141.85  Public education  and supple-
    mental  monitoring requirements.
  A water system that exceeds the lead
action  level based on tap water samples
collected in accordance  with  §141.86
shall deliver the public education ma-
terials contained in paragraphs (a) and
(b) of this  section in accordance with
the requirements in paragraph (c)  of
this section.
  (a) Content of written public  education
materials. (1) Community  water systems.
A  community  water system  shall in-
clude the following text in all of  the
printed   materials   it    distributes
through  its lead  public education pro-
gram. Systems may delete information
pertaining to lead service lines, upon
approval by the State, if no lead serv-
ice lines exist anywhere in  the water
system  service area.  Public education
language  at  paragraphs  (a)(l)(iv)(B)(5)
and (a)(l)(iv)(D)(2) of this section may
be modified regarding building permit
record availability and  consumer ac-
cess to these records, if approved by
the State. Systems may also continue
to utilize  pre-printed materials  that
meet the public education language re-
quirements in  40 CFR 141.85, effective
November 6,  1991, and contained in the
40 CFR, parts 100 to 149, edition revised
as of July 1,  1991. Any additional infor-
mation  presented by  a system shall be
consistent with the information below
and be in plain English that can be un-
derstood by lay people.
  (i) Introduction.  The United  States
Environmental   Protection   Agency
(EPA) and [insert name of water sup-
plier] are concerned about lead in your
drinking water. Although most homes
have very low levels of  lead in their
drinking  water,  some  homes in  the
community have lead levels above the
EPA action level of 15 parts per billion
(ppb), or  0.015  milligrams of lead  per
liter of  water (mg/L).  Under Federal
law we are required to have a program
in place  to  minimize  lead in your
drinking water by [insert  date  when
corrosion control will be completed for
your system].  This program includes
corrosion  control  treatment,  source
water treatment, and public education.
We are also required to replace the por-
tion of  each  lead  service line that we
own if  the line contributes lead  con-
centrations of  more than 15 ppb after
we have completed the comprehensive
treatment program.  If you have any
questions about how we are carrying
out the requirements of  the  lead regu-
lation please give us a call at [insert
water  system's phone  number].  This
brochure explains  the simple steps you
can take to protect you  and your fam-
ily by  reducing your exposure to lead
in drinking water.
  (ii) Health  effects of lead.  Lead is  a
common metal found throughout  the
environment  in lead-based paint, air,
soil,  household  dust,   food,  certain
types of pottery porcelain and pewter,
and water. Lead can pose a significant
                                    469

-------
§141.85
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
risk to your health if too much of it
enters your body. Lead builds up in the
body  over  many years  and can cause
damage to the  brain, red blood cells
and  kidneys. The greatest risk  is  to
young children  and pregnant  women.
Amounts of lead that won't hurt adults
can  slow  down  normal  mental  and
physical development of growing  bod-
ies. In addition, a child at play  often
comes into contact with sources of lead
contamination—like  dirt  and  dust—
that rarely affect an adult. It is impor-
tant to wash children's hands and toys
often,  and to try to make sure they
only put food in their mouths.
  (iii) Lead in drinking water. (A) Lead
in drinking water, although rarely the
sole cause of lead poisoning,  can sig-
nificantly increase a person's total lead
exposure,  particularly the exposure of
infants who  drink baby formulas and
concentrated juices  that are  mixed
with water.  The EPA estimates  that
drinking water can make up 20 percent
or more of a  person's total exposure to
lead.
  (B) Lead is unusual among drinking-
water  contaminants in  that it seldom
occurs naturally in water supplies like
rivers and  lakes. Lead enters drinking
water primarily  as a result of the cor-
rosion,  or wearing away,  of materials
containing lead  in the water distribu-
tion system  and household plumbing.
These materials  include lead-based sol-
der used to join  copper pipe, brass and
chrome plated brass faucets,  and  in
some cases,  pipes made  of lead  that
connect your house to the water main
(service lines). In 1986, Congress banned
the use of lead solder containing great-
er than 0.2% lead,  and restricted  the
lead content of faucets, pipes and other
plumbing materials to 8.0%.
  (C) When water stands in lead pipes
or plumbing systems containing  lead
for several hours or more,  the lead may
dissolve into  your drinking water. This
means the first  water drawn from the
tap in  the  morning, or  later in  the
afternoon after returning from work or
school, can contain fairly high levels of
lead.
  (iv) Steps you can take in the  home to
reduce exposure to lead in drinking water.
(A) Despite our best efforts mentioned
earlier to control water corrosivity and
remove lead from  the  water  supply,
lead levels in some homes or buildings
can be high. To find out whether you
need to take action in your own home,
have your drinking water tested to de-
termine  if it  contains excessive  con-
centrations of lead.  Testing the water
is  essential because  you cannot  see,
taste, or smell lead in drinking water.
Some local laboratories that  can  pro-
vide this service are listed at the end of
this booklet. For more information on
having your water tested, please  call
[insert phone number of water system].
  (B) If a water test indicates that the
drinking water  drawn  from a  tap  in
your home contains lead above 15  ppb,
then you should take the following pre-
cautions:
  (7) Let  the water run from the tap be-
fore using  it for drinking or cooking
any time  the water in a faucet has
gone unused for more than six hours.
The longer  water  resides   in  your
home's plumbing the more  lead it  may
contain.  Flushing  the tap  means  run-
ning the cold water faucet  until the
water gets  noticeably  colder,  asually
about 15-30 seconds. If your house has a
lead service line to  the water main,
you may have to flush the water for a
longer time, perhaps one minute, be-
fore drinking. Although toilet flushing
or showering flushes water through a
portion of  your  home's plumbing  sys-
tem, you still need to flush the water
in each faucet before using it for drink-
ing or cooking. Flushing tap water is a
simple and inexpensive measure  you
can  take  to  protect  your  family's
health. It usually uses less  than one or
two gallons  of  water  and costs  less
than [insert a cost estimate based on
flushing  two times a day for 30 days]
per month. To conserve water, fill a
couple of  bottles  for drinking water
after flushing the  tap, and whenever
possible  use the first  flush water  to
wash the dishes  or water the plants. If
you live in a high-rise building, letting
the water flow before using it may not
work to lessen your risk from lead. The
plumbing  systems  have  more,  and
sometimes larger  pipes than  smaller
buildings. Ask your landlord for help in
locating  the source of the lead and for
advice on reducing the lead level.
  (2) Try not  to cook  with,  or drink
water  from the  hot  water tap.  Hot
water  can  dissolve more  lead more
                                    470

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.85
quickly than  cold  water. If you need
hot water, draw water from the  cold
tap and heat it on the stove.
  (3) Remove loose lead solder and de-
bris from the plumbing' materials in-
stalled in newly constructed homes, or
homes in which  the plumbing has re-
cently been replaced, by removing  the
faucet strainers from all taps and run-
ning  the  water from 3 to  5 minutes.
Thereafter,  periodically  remove   the
strainers and flush out any  debris that
has accumulated over time.
  (4)  If your  copper pipes  are joined
with lead solder that has been installed
illegally since it was banned in 1986,
notify the plumber who did the work
and request that he or she replace  the
lead solder with lead-free solder. Lead
solder  looks  dull  gray,   and  when
scratched with a key looks shiny.  In
addition,  notify  your State  [insert
name of department responsible for en-
forcing the Safe Drinking Water Act in
your State] about the violation.
  (5)  Determine  whether or not  the
service  line that connects your home
or apartment to the water main is
made of lead. The best way to deter-
mine  if your  service line  is made of
lead  is  by either hiring  a licensed
plumber to inspect the line or by con-
tacting the plumbing contractor  who
installed the line. You can identify  the
plumbing contractor by checking  the
city's record of building permits which
should be maintained in the files of the
[insert name of department  that issues
building permits]. A licensed plumber
can at the same time check to see if
your  home's  plumbing- contains lead
solder, lead pipes, or pipe fittings that
contain lead. The public water system
that  delivers  water  to  your home
should also maintain records  of  the
materials located in the distribution
system. If the service  line  that con-
nects your dwelling to the  water main
contributes more than 15 ppb to drink-
ing water,  after our  comprehensive
treatment program is in place,  we  are
required to replace the portion of  the
line we own.  If the line  is only par-
tially owned by the [insert the name of
the city, county, or water system that
owns  the line], we are required to pro-
vide the owner of the privately-owned
portion of the  line with information on
how  to  replace  the privately-owned
portion of the service line, and offer to
replace that portion of the line at the
owner's expense. If we replace only the
portion of the line that we own, we also
are required  to notify you in advance
and  provide you  with information  on
the steps you can take to minimize ex-
posure  to any temporary increase in
lead levels that may result from  the
partial  replacement, to take a follow-
up sample at our expense from the line
within  72 hours after the partial re-
placement, and  to mail or  otherwise
provide you  with the results  of  that
sample  within three  business days of
receiving  the results.  Acceptable re-
placement alternatives include copper,
steel, iron, and plastic pipes.
  (6) Have an electrician  check your
wiring.  If grounding wires  from  the
electrical  system are  attached to your
pipes, corrosion may be greater. Check
with  a licensed   electrician  or your
local electrical  code to determine if
your wiring can be grounded elsewhere.
DO NOT attempt to change the  wiring
yourself because  improper grounding
can cause  electrical shock and fire haz-
ards.
  (C) The steps described above will re-
duce the lead concentrations in your
drinking water.  However, if a water
test indicates that the drinking water
coming from  your tap  contains  lead
concentrations in excess of 15 ppb after
flushing, or after we have completed
our  actions to minimize  lead  levels,
then you  may want  to take the fol-
lowing additional measures:
  (7) Purchase or  lease a home treat-
ment device. Home treatment devices
are limited  in that  each  unit  treats
only the water that flows from the fau-
cet to which it is connected, and all of
the  devices require  periodic mainte-
nance  and replacement. Devices such
as reverse osmosis systems or distillers
can effectively remove lead from your
drinking water. Some activated carbon
filters  may reduce lead levels at  the
tap, however all lead reduction  claims
should  be investigated.  Be  sure  to
check the actual performance of a spe-
cific home treatment device before and
after installing the unit.
  (2) Purchase bottled water for drink-
ing and cooking.
  (D)  You  can consult  a variety  of
sources for  additional  information.
                                    471
      203-160  D-16

-------
§141.85
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Your family doctor or pediatrician can
perform a blood test for lead and pro-
vide you with, information about the
health effects of lead.  State and local
government agencies that  can be con-
tacted include:
  (1) [insert the name of city or county
department of public utilities] at [in-
sert phone number] can provide you
with information  about  your  commu-
nity's water supply, and a  list of local
laboratories that have been certified by
EPA for testing water quality;
  (2) [insert the name of city or county
department that  issues  building per-
mits] at [insert phone number] can pro-
vide you with information about build-
ing permit  records that should contain
the  names  of  plumbing  contractors
that plumbed your home; and
  (3) [insert the  name of the State De-
partment of  Public Health] at [insert
phone number] or  the [insert the  name
of the city or county  health  depart-
ment]  at  [insert  phone number] can
provide you  with information  about
the health  effects  of lead and how you
can have your child's blood tested.
  (E) The following is a list  of  some
State  approved  laboratories  in  your
area that you can call  to have your
water  tested  for  lead.  [Insert names
and phone numbers of at least two lab-
oratories].
  (2) Non-transient  non-community  water
systems. A  non-transient non-commu-
nity water  system shall  either include
the text specified in paragraph (a)(l)  of
this section  or  shall include  the fol-
lowing text in all  of the printed mate-
rials it distributes through  its lead
public  education progr'am. Water sys-
tems  may  delete  information per-
taining to  lead  service  lines upon ap-
proval  by the State if no lead service
lines exist  anywhere in the water sys-
tem service area. Any additional infor-
mation presented by a system shall be
consistent with  the information below
and be in plain English that can be un-
derstood by lay people.
  (i) Introduction.  The  United States
Environmental  Protection  Agency
(EPA) and  [insert  name  of water sup-
plier] are concerned about lead in your
drinking water.  Some  drinking water
samples taken from this facility have
lead levels  above the EPA  action level
of 15  parts  per  billion  (ppb),  or 0.015
milligrams of lead per liter of water
(mg/L).  Under Federal law we  are re-
quired to have a program in place to
minimize lead in your drinking water
by [insert date when corrosion  control
will  be  completed for your system].
This program includes corrosion  con-
trol  treatment,  source  water  treat-
ment,  and public education.  We are
also  required to replace the portion of
each lead service  line that we own if
the  line  contributes lead concentra-
tions of more than 15 ppb after we have
completed the  comprehensive  treat-
ment program. If you have any ques-
tions about how we are carrying out
the requirements of the lead regulation
please  give us a call at [insert water
system's phone number]. This brochure
explains the simple steps you can take
to protect yourself  by reducing your
exposure to lead in drinking water.
  (ii) Health  effects  of lead.  Lead is
found throughout the  environment in
lead-based paint,  air,  soil, household
dust, food, certain types of pottery por-
celain and pewter, and water. Lead can
pose a significant risk to your health if
too much of it enters your body. Lead
builds up in the body over many years
and can cause damage to the brain, red
blood cells and  kidneys. The greatest
risk  is to young children and pregnant
women.  Amounts of lead that won't
hurt adults can slow down normal men-
tal and physical development of grow-
ing bodies. In addition, a child  at  play
often comes into contact  with  sources
of lead  contamination—like dirt and
dust—that rarely affect an adult.  It is
important to  wash children's hands and
toys often, and to try to make  sure
they only put food in their mouths.
  (iii) Lead in drinking water. (A) Lead
in drinking water, although rarely the
sole  cause of lead poisoning, can sig-
nificantly increase a person's total lead
exposure, particularly  the exposure of
infants  who drink baby formulas and
concentrated  juices that are  mixed
with water. The EPA estimates  that
drinking water can make up 20 percent
or more of a person's total exposure to
lead.
  (B) Lead is unusual  among drinking
water contaminants in that it  seldom
occurs naturally in water  supplies like
rivers and lakes. Lead enters drinking
                                    472

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.85
water primarily as a result of the cor-
rosion,  or wearing away, of materials
containing lead in the water distribu-
tion system and household  plumbing.
These materials include lead-based sol-
der used to join copper pipe, brass and
chrome-plated  brass  faucets, and  in
some cases,  pipes  made  of  lead  that
connect houses and buildings to water
mains (service lines). In 1986, Congress
banned  the  use of  lead  solder  con-
taining greater than 0.2% lead, and re-
stricted the lead content of faucets,
pipes and other plumbing materials to
8.0%.
  (C) When water stands in  lead pipes
or plumbing systems containing  lead
for several hours or more, the lead may
dissolve into your drinking water.  This
means the first water drawn from the
tap  in  the morning,  or  later  in the
afternoon  if the water has not  been
used all day, can contain fairly  high
levels of lead.
  (iv) Steps you can take to reduce expo-
sure  to  lead in  drinking water. (A) Let
the water run from the tap before using
it for drinking or cooking any time the
water in a faucet has gone unused for
more than six hours. The longer water
resides  in plumbing  the more lead it
may contain. Flushing the tap  means
running the cold water faucet for about
15-30 seconds. Although toilet flushing
or showering flushes water  through  a
portion of the plumbing system,  you
still  need  to flush the water in  each
faucet before using it for drinking  or
cooking. Flushing tap water is a simple
and inexpensive measure you can  take
to protect your health. It usually  uses
less than one gallon of water.
  (B) Do not cook with, or drink water
from the hot water tap. Hot  water can
dissolve more lead more quickly than
cold  water. If you need hot water, draw
water from the cold tap and then  heat
it.
  (C) The steps described above will re-
duce the  lead concentrations in your
drinking  water. However, if you are
still  concerned,  you  may wish  to use
bottled  water for drinking and cooking.
  (D) You can  consult a variety  of
sources  for  additional  information.
Your family doctor or pediatrician can
perform a blood test for lead and pro-
vide  you  with  information  about the
health effects of lead. State and local
government agencies that can be con-
tacted include:
  (7) [insert the name or  title of facil-
ity official if appropriate] at  [insert
phone  number]  can provide you  with
information about your facility's water
supply; and
  (2) [insert the name or title of the
State Department of Public Health] at
[insert phone number] or the  [insert
the name of the city or county health
department] at  [insert phone number]
can  provide  you  with   information
about the health effects of lead.
  (b) Content  of broadcast materials. A
water  system shall  include  the  fol-
lowing information in all public service
announcements  submitted under its
lead public education program to  tele-
vision  and radio  stations for  broad-
casting:
  (1) Why should  everyone  want  to
know the facts about lead and drinking
water? Because  unhealthy amounts of
lead can enter drinking water through
the plumbing in your home. That's why
I urge  you to do what I did. I had my
water  tested for [insert free  or $ per
sample].  You  can contact the  [insert
the name of the city or water system]
for information  on testing and on sim-
ple ways to  reduce your  exposure to
lead in drinking water.
  (2) To   have your  water tested for
lead, or to get more information about
this  public health concern, please call
[insert the phone number of the city or
water system].
  (c) Delivery of a  public education pro-
gram. (1) In communities  where a  sig-
nificant  proportion  of the population
speaks a language other than English,
public  education  materials shall  be
communicated in  the appropriate lan-
guage(s).
  (2) A community water system  that
exceeds the lead  action  level on  the
basis of tap water  samples collected in
accordance with §141.86, and that is not
already  repeating-  public education
tasks  pursuant to  paragraph (c)(3),
(c)(7), or  (c)(8),  of this section, shall,
within 60 days:
  (i) Insert notices in each customer's
water utility bill containing the infor-
mation in paragraph (a)(l) of  this sec-
tion, along with the following alert on
the  water bill  itself in  large print:
"SOME HOMES  IN THIS COMMUNITY
                                    473

-------
§141.85
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
HAVE ELEVATED LEAD LEVELS IN
THEIR  DRINKING  WATER.  LEAD
CAN POSE A SIGNIFICANT RISK TO
YOUR HEALTH. PLEASE READ  THE
ENCLOSED  NOTICE FOR  FURTHER
INFORMATION." A community water
system having a billing cycle that does
not include a billing within 60 days of
exceeding the action level, or that can-
not insert  information in  the water
utility  bill   without  making  major
changes to its billing system, may use
a separate mailing to deliver the infor-
mation in paragraph (a)(l) of this sec-
tion as long as the information is deliv-
ered to each customer within 60 days of
exceeding the action level. Such water
systems  shall also include  the  "alert"
language specified in this paragraph.
  (ii)  Submit the information in para-
graph (a)(l) of this section to the edi-
torial departments of the major daily
and   weekly  newspapers  circulated
throughout the community.
  (iii)  Deliver pamphlets  and/or  bro-
chures that contain the public  edu-
cation materials in paragraphs (a)(l)(ii)
and (a)(l)(iv)  of this section to facili-
ties and  organizations, including  the
following:
  (A)   Public schools,  and/or  local
school boards;
  (B)  City  or county  health depart-
ment;
  (C)  Women, Infants,  and  Children
and/or Head Start Program(s) whenever
available;
  (D) Public and private hospitals and/
or clinics;
  (E) Pediatricians;
  (F) Family planning clinics; and
  (G) Local welfare agencies.
  (iv)   Submit the  public  service  an-
nouncement in  paragraph (b) of this
section to at least five of the radio and
television stations with the largest au-
diences that broadcast  to the commu-
nity served by the water system.
  (3) A community water system shall
repeat the tasks contained  in  para-
graphs (c)(2) (i), (ii) and (iii) of this sec-
tion every  12 months,  and the  tasks
contained  in paragraphs (c)(2)(iv)  of
this section every 6 months for as long
as the system exceeds the lead action
level.
  (4) Within 60 days after it exceeds the
lead action level (unless it already is
repeating public education tasks pursu-
ant to paragraph (c)(5) of this section),
a non-transient non-community  water
system shall  deliver the public edu-
cation  materials specified  by  para-
graph (a)(l) of this section or the public
education materials specified by para-
graph (a)(2) of this section as follows:
  (i) Post informational posters on lead
in drinking water in a  public place or
common area in each of the buildings
served by the system; and
  (ii)  Distribute  informational  pam-
phlets  and/or  brochures  on lead  in
drinking water  to each person served
by  the non-transient non-community
water system. The State may allow the
system  to  utilize  electronic   trans-
mission  in  lieu  of  or  combined with
printed materials as long as it achieves
at least the same coverage.
  (5) A non-transient non-community
water  system shall repeat  the  tasks
contained  in  paragraph  (c)(4) of this
section at  least once during each cal-
endar year in which the system exceeds
the lead action level.
  (6) A water system may discontinue
delivery of public education materials
if the  system has met the lead action
level during the most recent six-month
monitoring period conducted pursuant
to §141.86. Such a system shall recom-
mence public  education in accordance
with this section if it subsequently ex-
ceeds the lead action level during any
monitoring period.
  (7) A community water system may
apply to the State,  in writing, (unless
the State has waived the requirement
for prior State  approval) to use  the
text specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section in lieu of the text in paragraph
(a)(l) of this section  and to perform the
tasks  listed  in  paragraphs  (c)(4) and
(c)(5) of this section in lieu of the tasks
in paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this
section if:
  (i) The system is a facility, such as a
prison or a hospital, where  the  popu-
lation  served is not capable of or is pre-
vented from making improvements to
plumbing or  installing point of  use
treatment devices; and
  (ii) The  system  provides water  as
part of the cost of services provided
and  does  not separately charge  for
water consumption.
  (8)(i)  A  community   water  system
serving 3,300 or fewer people may omit
                                    474

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.86
the   task  contained   in  paragraph
(c)(2)(iv) of this section. As long as it
distributes  notices containing  the in-
formation contained in paragraph (a)(l)
of  this  section to  every  household
served by the  system, such  systems
may  further  limit  their public  edu-
cation programs as follows:
  (A) Systems serving 500 or fewer peo-
ple may forego the task  contained  in
paragraph  (c)(2)(ii)  of  this  section.
Such a system may limit the distribu-
tion of the  public education materials
required under  paragraph (c)(2)(iii)  of
this section to facilities and organiza-
tions served by the system that are
most likely to be visited regularly by
pregnant women and children, unless it
is notified by the State in writing that
it must make a broader distribution.
  (B) If approved by the State in writ-
ing, a system serving 501 to 3,300 people
may  omit  the  task  in  paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section and/or limit the
distribution  of the  public education
materials  required   under  paragraph
(c)(2)(iii)  of this  section  to facilities
and organizations served by the system
that are most likely to be visited regu-
larly by pregnant women and children.
  (ii) A community water system serv-
ing 3,300 or fewer people that delivers
public education  in accordance with
paragraph (c)(8)(i) of this  section shall
repeat the  required public education
tasks at  least  once during each cal-
endar year in which the system exceeds
the lead action level.
  (d) Supplemental monitoring and notifi-
cation of results.  A water system  that
fails  to meet  the lead action level on
the basis of tap samples collected  in
accordance  with §141.86 shall offer  to
sample the  tap water of any customer
who requests it. The system is not re-
quired to pay for collecting  or  ana-
lyzing the sample, nor is the system re-
quired to collect and analyze the sam-
ple itself.
[56 PR 26548,  June 7, 1991; 57 PR 28788, June
29, 1992, as amended at 65 PR 2005, Jan.  12,
2000; 69 PR 38856, June 29, 2004]

§ 141.86 Monitoring  requirements for
    lead and copper in tap water.
  (a) Sample site location. (1) By the ap-
plicable  date  for  commencement  of
monitoring  under paragraph (d)(l)  of
this section, each water system shall
complete a materials evaluation of its
distribution system in order to identify
a pool of targeted sampling sites that
meets the requirements of this section,
and  which is sufficiently  large to  en-
sure that the water system can collect
the number of lead and copper tap sam-
ples required in paragraph (c) of this
section. All sites from which first draw
samples are collected shall be selected
from this  pool  of targeted  sampling
sites. Sampling sites may not include
faucets that have point-of-use or point-
of-entry treatment devices designed to
remove inorganic contaminants.
  (2) A water system shall use the  in-
formation on lead, copper, and galva-
nized steel that it is required to collect
under §141.42(d)  of  this  part [special
monitoring for corrosivity characteris-
tics] when conducting a materials eval-
uation. When an evaluation of the  in-
formation    collected   pursuant   to
§141.42(d) is  insufficient to locate the
requisite number of lead  and copper
sampling sites that meet the targeting
criteria in paragraph (a)  of  this sec-
tion, the water system shall review the
sources of information listed below in
order to identify a sufficient number of
sampling sites. In addition, the system
shall seek to collect such information
where possible in the course of its nor-
mal operations (e.g., checking service
line materials when reading water me-
ters or performing maintenance activi-
ties):
  (i) All  plumbing codes, permits, and
records in the  files of the building  de-
partment(s) which indicate the plumb-
ing materials that are installed within
publicly  and privately owned struc-
tures connected to the distribution sys-
tem;
  (ii) All inspections and records of the
distribution  system that  indicate the
material composition  of  the  service
connections  that connect a structure
to the distribution system; and
  (iii) All existing water quality infor-
mation, which includes the results of
all prior analyses of the system or indi-
vidual structures connected to the sys-
tem, indicating locations that may be
particularly susceptible to high lead or
copper concentrations.
  (3) The sampling sites selected  for a
community   water system's  sampling
                                     475

-------
§141.86
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
pool ("tier 1 sampling sites") shall con-
sist of single family structures that:
  (i) Contain copper pipes with lead sol-
der installed after 1982 or contain lead
pipes; and/or
  (ii) Are served by a lead service line.
When multiple-family residences com-
prise at  least 20  percent of the struc-
tures served by  a water system,  the
system  may  include  these  types of
structures in its sampling pool.
  (4)  Any community   water system
with insufficient  tier 1 sampling sites
shall complete its sampling pool  with
"tier 2 sampling sites", consisting of
buildings,  including  multiple-family
residences that:
  (i) Contain copper pipes with lead sol-
der installed after 1982 or contain lead
pipes; and/or
  (ii) Are served by a lead service line.
  (5)  Any community   water system
with insufficient  tier 1 and  tier 2 sam-
pling sites shall complete its  sampling
pool with "tier 3 sampling  sites", con-
sisting of single family structures that
contain copper pipes with  lead solder
installed  before  1983.  A  community
water system with insufficient tier 1,
tier  2, and tier 3 sampling sites shall
complete its sampling  pool with rep-
resentative  sites throughout the  dis-
tribution system. For the  purpose of
this  paragraph, a representative site is
a site in  which the plumbing materials
used at that site would be commonly
found  at other  sites served by  the
water system.
  (6) The sampling sites selected for a
non-transient  noncommunity  water
system ("tier 1 sampling sites") shall
consist of buildings that:
  (i) Contain copper pipes with lead sol-
der installed after 1982 or contain lead
pipes; and/or
  (ii) Are served by a lead service line.
  (7) A non-transient non-community
water system with insufficient tier 1
sites that meet the targeting criteria
in paragraph (a)(6) of this section shall
complete its sampling pool with sam-
pling sites  that  contain copper pipes
with lead solder installed before 1983. If
additional sites are needed to  complete
the sampling pool,  the non-transient
non-community water system shall use
representative  sites  throughout  the
distribution system. For the purpose of
this paragraph, a representative site is
a site in which the plumbing materials
used at that site  would be commonly
found  at other  sites  served  by  the
water system.
  (8) Any water system whose distribu-
tion system contains lead service lines
shall draw 50 percent of the samples it
collects during1 each monitoring period
from sites that contain lead pipes, or
copper pipes with lead solder,  and 50
percent  of  the  samples  from sites
served by a lead service line. A water
system that cannot identify a suffi-
cient number of sampling  sites served
by a lead service line shall collect first-
draw samples from all of the sites iden-
tified as being served by such lines.
  (b) Sample collection methods  (1)  All
tap  samples  for  lead  and copper  col-
lected  in accordance with this subpart,
with the exception of lead service  line
samples collected under §141.84(c)  and
samples   collected  under  paragraph
(b)(5) of this section, shall be first-draw
samples.
  (2) Each first-draw  tap sample  for
lead and copper  shall be one liter in
volume and have  stood motionless in
the plumbing system of each sampling
site  for at least  six hours. First-draw
samples from residential housing shall
be collected from the cold water kitch-
en tap or bathroom sink tap. First-
draw samples  from  a nonresidential
building shall  be  one liter in volume
and shall be collected at an interior tap
from which water is  typically drawn
for consumption.  Non-first-draw sam-
ples  collected in lieu of first-draw sam-
ples  pursuant  to paragraph  (b)(5) of
this  section shall be one liter in  vol-
ume and shall  be collected at an inte-
rior  tap from which water is typically
drawn   for  consumption.   First-draw
samples may be collected by the sys-
tem  or the system may allow residents
to collect first-draw samples  after in-
structing the residents of the sampling
procedures specified in this paragraph.
To  avoid problems  of residents han-
dling nitric acid, acidification of first-
draw samples  may  be done up to 14
days after  the  sample is  collected.
After acidification to resolubilize  the
metals, the  sample must stand  in  the
original container for the time speci-
fied  in the approved EPA method  be-
fore  the sample can be  analyzed. If a
system allows  residents  to  perform
                                    476

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.86
sampling, the  system  may not chal-
lenge, based on alleged errors in sam-
ple collection, the  accuracy  of sam-
pling results.
  (3) Bach service line sample shall be
one liter in volume and have stood mo-
tionless in the lead service line for at
least six hours. Lead service line sam-
ples shall be collected in one of the fol-
lowing three ways:
  (i) At the tap after flushing the vol-
ume of water between the tap and the
lead service line. The volume of water
shall be  calculated based on  the inte-
rior diameter and length of the pipe be-
tween the tap and the lead service line;
  (ii) Tapping-  directly  into  the  lead
service line; or
  (iii) If the sampling site is a building
constructed  as a  single-family  resi-
dence, allowing the water to run until
there is  a significant change in tem-
perature which would be indicative of
water that  has been  standing in  the
lead service line.
  (4) A water system shall collect each
first draw  tap sample  from the same
sampling site from which it collected a
previous sample. If, for any reason, the
water system cannot gain  entry  to a
sampling site in order to collect a fol-
low-up tap sample, the system may col-
lect the follow-up tap sample from an-
other sampling site in its  sampling
pool as long as the new site meets the
same targeting criteria, and  is within
reasonable proximity of the  original
site.
  (5) A  non-transient non-community
water system,  or  a community water
system  that  meets  the  criteria  of
§§141.85(c)(7)(i)  and (ii),  that  does  not
have enough taps that can supply first-
draw samples, as defined in §141.2,  may
apply to the State in writing to  sub-
stitute  non-first-draw  samples.  Such
systems  must  collect  as  many first-
draw samples from appropriate taps as
possible  and identify sampling times
and locations that would likely result
in the longest standing time for the re-
maining  sites.  The State has the dis-
cretion  to waive  the requirement for
prior State  approval of non-first-draw
sample sites selected by the system,  ei-
ther through State regulation or writ-
ten notification to the system.
  (c) Number of samples. Water systems
shall collect at least one sample during
each  monitoring  period specified  in
paragraph (d) of this section from the
number of sites listed in the first col-
umn  ("standard  monitoring")  of  the
table  in this paragraph. A system con-
ducting  reduced   monitoring   under
paragraph (d)(4) of  this  section shall
collect at least one sample from  the
number of sites specified  in the second
column ("reduced  monitoring") of  the
table  in this  paragraph during each
monitoring  period specified in  para-
graph (d)(4)  of this section. Such re-
duced monitoring sites  shall  be rep-
resentative  of the  sites required for
standard monitoring. States may  speci-
fy sampling locations when a system is
conducting  reduced  monitoring. The
table is as follows:
System size (number of people served)


>100,000 . . 	
10,001 to100,000 . ...
3,301 to 10,000 . 	
501 to 3,300
101 to 500 	
<100 	 	
Number
of sites
(stand-

toring)
100
60
40
20
10
5
Number
of sites
(reduced
moni-
toring)
50
30
20
10
5
5
  (d) Timing of monitoring—(1) Initial tap
sampling.
  The first  six-month monitoring pe-
riod for small, medium-size  and large
systems shall begin  on the following
dates:
System size (No people served)
>50,000 . . .
3,301 to 50,000
<3,300
First six-month moni-
toring period begins on
January 1, 1992
July 1, 1992
July 1, 1993
  (i) All large systems  shall monitor
during two consecutive six-month peri-
ods.
  (ii)  All  small and medium-size sys-
tems  shall  monitor during  each six-
month monitoring period until:
  (A)  The system exceeds the lead  or
copper action level and is therefore re-
quired to implement the  corrosion con-
trol  treatment  requirements   under
§141.81, in which  case the system shall
continue  monitoring  in  accordance
with paragraph (d)(2) of this section, or
  (B)  The system meets the  lead and
copper  action levels  during two con-
secutive six-month monitoring periods,
in which case the system may  reduce
                                    477

-------
§141.86
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
monitoring  in accordance with  para-
graph (d)(4) of this section.
  (2) Monitoring after installation of cor-
rosion  control and  source  water  treat-
ment, (i) Any large system which in-
stalls optimal corrosion control treat-
ment  pursuant  to  §141.81(d)(4)  shall
monitor during two  consecutive six-
month monitoring: periods by the date
specified in §141.81(d)(5).
  (ii) Any small or medium-size system
which  installs optimal corrosion con-
trol  treatment pursuant to §141.81(e)(5)
shall monitor during two consecutive
six-month monitoring periods by the
date specified in §141.81(e)(6).
  (iii)   Any   system  which   installs
source  water treatment  pursuant  to
§141.83(a)(3)  shall monitor during two
consecutive  six-month monitoring pe-
riods   by   the   date   specified   in
§141.83(a)(4).
  (3)  Monitoring  after  State   specifies
water quality parameter values for opti-
mal  corrosion  control. After the  State
specifies the values for water quality
control parameters under §141.82(f), the
system shall monitor during- each sub-
sequent six-month  monitoring period,
with the first monitoring period  to
begin on the  date  the  State  specifies
the optimal values under §141.82(f).
  (4) Reduced monitoring, (i) A small  or
medium-size  water system that meets
the lead and copper action levels dur-
ing each of two consecutive six-month
monitoring  periods may  reduce the
number of samples in accordance with
paragraph (c) of this section,  and re-
duce the frequency of sampling to once
per year.
  (ii) Any water system that maintains
the range of values for the water qual-
ity control parameters reflecting opti-
mal  corrosion control treatment speci-
fied by the State under §141.82(f) during
each  of  two consecutive  six-month
monitoring periods may reduce the fre-
quency of monitoring to once per year
and reduce the number of lead and cop-
per samples in accordance with  para-
graph (c)  of this section if it receives
written approval  from the State. The
State shall  review monitoring, treat-
ment,  and other relevant information
submitted by the water system in ac-
cordance with §141.90, and shall notify
the system  in writing  when it deter-
mines  the system is eligible to com-
mence reduced monitoring pursuant to
this paragraph. The State shall review,
and where appropriate, revise its deter-
mination when the system submits new
monitoring or treatment data, or when
other data relevant to the number and
frequency of tap  sampling  becomes
available.
  (iii)  A small or medium-size water
system that meets the lead and copper
action levels during three consecutive
years  of monitoring may reduce  the
frequency of monitoring  for lead and
copper from annually  to  once every
three  years. Any water  system that
maintains the range  of values for  the
water  quality  control parameters  re-
flecting  optimal  corrosion   control
treatment specified by the State under
§141.82(f)  during three   consecutive
years  of monitoring may reduce  the
frequency of monitoring from annually
to once every three years if it receives
written approval from the  State. The
State  shall  review monitoring, treat-
ment,  and other relevant  information
submitted by the water system in  ac-
cordance with §141.90, and shall notify
the system  in writing  when it deter-
mines  the system is eligible to reduce
the frequency  of monitoring  to once
every three  years. The  State shall re-
view, and where appropriate, revise its
determination  when  the  system sub-
mits  new  monitoring  or  treatment
data, or when other data relevant to
the number  and frequency of tap sam-
pling becomes available.
  (iv) A water system that reduces  the
number  and  frequency  of sampling
shall  collect these  samples from rep-
resentative sites included in the pool of
targeted sampling  sites identified  in
paragraph (a) of  this section.  Systems
sampling  annually  or less frequently
shall conduct the lead and copper  tap
sampling during  the  months of June,
July, 'August, or  September unless  the
State  has approved  a  different  sam-
pling period  in accordance  with  para-
graph (d)(4)(iv)(A) of this section.
  (A) The State, at its discretion, may
approve  a  different  period for con-
ducting the  lead and copper tap sam-
pling for systems collecting a reduced
number of samples.  Such a period shall
be  no longer  than  four  consecutive
months and must represent a time of
normal operation where  the highest
                                    478

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.86
levels of lead are most likely to occur.
For a  non-transient  non-community
water system that does  not operate
during-  the months  of June  through
September, and for which the period of
normal operation  where  the highest
levels of lead are most likely to occur
is not known, the State shall designate
a period that represents a time of nor-
mal operation for the system.
  (B)  Systems  monitoring  annually,
that have been collecting samples dur-
ing the months of June  through Sep-
tember and that receive State approval
to alter their sample collection period
under paragraph  (d)(4)(iv)(A) of this
section, must collect their next round
of samples  during  a time period that
ends no later than  21 months  after the
previous round of  sampling.  Systems
monitoring triennially that have  been
collecting  samples  during the months
of  June through  September,  and re-
ceive State approval to alter  the sam-
pling collection period as per para-
graph (d)(4)(iv)(A) of this section, must
collect their next round of samples dur-
ing a time period  that ends no later
than  45 months  after the  previous
round of sampling. Subsequent rounds
of sampling must be collected annually
or triennially, as required by this sec-
tion.  Small  systems  with  waivers,
granted pursuant to paragraph (g) of
this section, that have been collecting
samples  during the months  of June
through September and receive State
approval to alter their sample collec-
tion    period    under    paragraph
(d)(4)(iv)(A) of this section must collect
their  next round of samples before the
end of the 9-year period.
  (v)  Any   water   system that dem-
onstrates for two consecutive 6-month
monitoring  periods that the tap water
lead level computed under §141.80(c)(3)
is less than or equal to 0.005 mg/L and
the tap water copper  level computed
under §141.80(c)(3) is less than or equal
to 0.65 mg/L may reduce the number of
samples in accordance  with paragraph
(c) of this  section  and reduce the fre-
quency of sampling to once every three
calendar years.
  (vi)(A) A small or medium-size water
system  subject to reduced monitoring
that exceeds the lead or copper action
level shall  resume sampling in accord-
ance with paragraph (d)(3) of this sec-
tion and collect the number of samples
specified   for   standard  monitoring
under  paragraph  (c)  of  this  section.
Such a system shall also conduct water
quality parameter  monitoring in ac-
cordance with §141.87(b),  (c) or (d) (as
appropriate) during the monitoring pe-
riod in which it  exceeded the action
level. Any such system may resume an-
nual monitoring for lead and copper at
the tap at  the reduced number of sites
specified in paragraph (c) of this sec-
tion after it has completed two subse-
quent consecutive six-month rounds of
monitoring that meet the criteria of
paragraph  (d)(4)(i)  of this section and/
or  may  resume  triennial monitoring
for lead and  copper  at the  reduced
number of sites after it  demonstrates
through  subsequent rounds of moni-
toring that it meets the criteria of ei-
ther paragraph (d)(4)(iii)  or (d)(4)(v) of
this section.
  (B) Any water system  subject to the
reduced  monitoring  frequency  that
fails to operate at  or above the  min-
imum value or within the range of val-
ues for the water  quality parameters
specified by the State under §141.82(f)
for more  than nine days in any six-
month  period  specified  in §141.87(d)
shall  conduct tap  water  sampling for
lead and copper at the frequency speci-
fied in paragraph (d)(3) of this section,
collect the number of samples specified
for standard monitoring under para-
graph (c) of this section, and shall re-
sume monitoring for water quality pa-
rameters within the distribution sys-
tem in accordance with §141.87(d). Such
a system may resume reduced moni-
toring for  lead and copper at  the tap
and for water quality parameters with-
in the distribution system under the
following conditions:
  (1) The  system  may resume  annual
monitoring for lead and copper at the
tap at  the reduced number of  sites
specified in paragraph (c) of this sec-
tion after it has completed two subse-
quent six-month rounds  of monitoring
that meet  the  criteria   of paragraph
(d)(4)(ii) of this section and the system
has received written approval from the
State that  it is  appropriate to resume
reduced monitoring on an annual fre-
quency.
  (2) The system may resume triennial
monitoring for lead and copper at the
                                    479

-------
§141.86
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
tap  at  the reduced  number of sites
after it  demonstrates through  subse-
quent  rounds  of  monitoring that  it
meets the criteria of either paragraph
(d)(4)(iii) or (d)(4)(v) of this section and
the  system has received written  ap-
proval from the State that it is appro-
priate to resume triennial monitoring.
  (3) The system may reduce the num-
ber  of  water  quality parameter tap
water samples required  in accordance
with  §141.87(e)(l)  and  the  frequency
with which  it collects such samples in
accordance  with §141.87(e)(2). Such  a
system may not resume triennial mon-
itoring for water quality parameters at
the tap until it demonstrates,  in  ac-
cordance  with  the  requirements  of
§141.87(e)(2), that it has re-qualified for
triennial monitoring.
  (vii)  Any  water  system subject to a
reduced  monitoring  frequency   under
paragraph (d)(4) of this section that ei-
ther adds a new  source of water  or
changes any water treatment shall in-
form the  State in writing  in accord-
ance with §141.90(a)(3). The State may
require the system to resume sampling
in accordance with paragraph (d)(3) of
this section and collect the number of
samples  specified  for standard moni-
toring under paragraph (c) of this sec-
tion or take  other  appropriate steps
such as increased water quality param-
eter monitoring or re-evaluation of its
corrosion control treatment  given the
potentially different water quality con-
siderations.
  (e) Additional monitoring by systems.
The results of any  monitoring con-
ducted in addition to  the minimum re-
quirements of this section shall be con-
sidered by the system and the State in
making any determinations (i.e., calcu-
lating the 90th percentile lead or cop-
per level) under this subpart.
  (f) Invalidation of lead or copper  tap
water samples. A  sample  invalidated
under this paragraph does not count to-
ward determining  lead or  copper 90th
percentile levels under §141.80(c)(3)  or
toward  meeting the  minimum moni-
toring requirements of paragraph (c) of
this section.
  (1) The State may  invalidate  a lead
or copper tap water sample at least if
one of the following conditions is met.
  (i) The laboratory establishes  that
improper sample analysis caused erro-
neous results.
  (ii)  The  State determines that  the
sample was taken from a site that did
not meet the site selection criteria of
this section.
  (iii) The  sample container was dam-
aged in transit.
  (iv) There is substantial reason to be-
lieve that  the  sample was subject to
tampering.
  (2) The system must report the re-
sults of all samples to the State and all
supporting documentation for  samples
the system believes should be invali-
dated.
  (3) To invalidate a sample under
paragraph (f)(l)  of this section, the de-
cision and the  rationale  for the deci-
sion must  be  documented in  writing.
States may not invalidate  a sample
solely on the grounds that a follow-up
sample result is higher or lower than
that of the original sample.
  (4) The water  system must collect re-
placement  samples for any samples in-
validated under this section if, after
the invalidation of one or more sam-
ples, the system has too few samples to
meet  the  minimum  requirements of
paragraph (c) of this section. Any such
replacement samples must be taken as
soon as possible, but no later  than 20
days after  the  date the  State invali-
dates the sample or by the end of the
applicable  monitoring  period,  which-
ever occurs later. Replacement  samples
taken after the end of the applicable
monitoring period shall  not  also  be
used to meet the monitoring  require-
ments of a subsequent monitoring pe-
riod. The replacement samples  shall be
taken at the same locations  as the in-
validated samples or, if that is not pos-
sible, at  locations other than those al-
ready used for sampling during  the
monitoring period.
  (g) Monitoring waivers  for  small  sys-
tems. Any small  system that meets the
criteria of this paragraph  may apply to
the State  to reduce the  frequency of
monitoring for lead and  copper under
this section to  once every nine years
(i.e., a "full waiver") if it meets all of
the materials criteria specified  in para-
graph (g)(l) of  this section and all of
the monitoring criteria  specified  in
paragraph (g)(2)  of this section.  If State
                                    480

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.86
regulations permit, any  small system
that meets the criteria in paragraphs
(g)(l) and  (2) of this  section  only for
lead, or only for copper,  may  apply to
the State  for  a  waiver to reduce  the
frequency  of tap water monitoring to
once every nine years for that contami-
nant only (i.e.,  a "partial waiver").
  (1) Materials criteria. The system must
demonstrate that its  distribution sys-
tem and service lines and all  drinking
water   supply   plumbing,  including
plumbing  conveying  drinking  water
within all residences and buildings con-
nected to the system, are free of lead-
containing  materials  and/or  copper-
containing  materials,  as  those  terms
are defined in this paragraph, as  fol-
lows:
  (i) Lead.  To qualify for a full waiver,
or  a  waiver of  the tap  water  moni-
toring requirements for  lead (i.e., a
"lead waiver"),  the water system must
provide  certification  and supporting
documentation to  the State that  the
system is  free of all  lead-containing
materials,  as follows:
  (A) It contains no plastic pipes which
contain  lead  plasticizers, or plastic
service lines which contain lead plasti-
cizers; and
  (B) It  is free  of  lead  service lines,
lead pipes, lead soldered pipe joints,
and leaded brass or bronze alloy  fit-
tings and fixtures, unless  such fittings
and fixtures meet the specifications of
any standard established pursuant to 42
U.S.C.  300g-6(e) (SDWA section 1417(e)).
  (ii) Copper. To qualify for a full waiv-
er,  or a waiver of the tap water moni-
toring requirements for copper (i.e., a
"copper  waiver"),  the water  system
must provide  certification  and  sup-
porting documentation to the  State
that the  system contains no copper
pipes or copper service lines.
  (2)  Monitoring  criteria for  waiver
issuance. The system  must have  com-
pleted  at least one 6-month round of
standard tap water monitoring for lead
and copper at sites approved by  the
State and from the number of sites re-
quired by paragraph (c) of this section
and demonstrate that  the  90th  per-
centile levels for any and all rounds of
monitoring conducted since the system
became free of all lead-containing and/
or copper-containing materials, as ap-
propriate, meet the following criteria.
  (i) Lead levels. To qualify for a full
waiver, or a lead waiver, the  system
must demonstrate  that the  90th  per-
centile lead level does not exceed 0.005
mg/L.
  (ii) Copper levels. To qualify for a full
waiver, or a copper waiver, the system
must demonstrate  that the  90th  per-
centile copper  level does not exceed
0.65 mg/L.
  (3) State approval of waiver application.
The  State shall notify the system of its
waiver determination, in writing,  set-
ting forth the basis of its decision and
any  condition of the waiver. As a con-
dition  of the waiver, the State may re-
quire the system to perform  specific
activities  (e.g.,  limited  monitoring,
periodic  outreach to customers to re-
mind them to avoid installation of ma-
terials that might void the waiver) to
avoid the risk of lead or copper con-
centration of concern in tap water. The
small  system   must  continue  moni-
toring for lead and copper at the tap as
required by paragraphs  (d)(l) through
(d)(4) of this section, as  appropriate,
until it  receives written  notification
from the State  that  the waiver  has
been approved.
  (4) Monitoring  frequency for  systems
with waivers, (i) A  system with a full
waiver must conduct tap water moni-
toring for lead  and copper in  accord-
ance with paragraph (d)(4)(iv)  of  this
section at the reduced number  of sam-
pling sites identified in paragraph (c)
of this section at least once every nine
years and provide the materials certifi-
cation specified in paragraph (g)(l) of
this  section for both lead and copper to
the  State along with the monitoring
results.
  (ii) A system  with a partial waiver
must conduct tap water monitoring for
the waived contaminant in accordance
with paragraph (d)(4)(iv) of this section
at the reduced  number  of  sampling
sites specified in paragraph (c) of  this
section at least once every nine years
and provide  the  materials certification
specified in paragraph (g)(l) of this sec-
tion  pertaining to the waived contami-
nant along  with  the monitoring  re-
sults.  Such a system also must con-
tinue to monitor for the non-waived
contaminant in accordance  with  re-
quirements of paragraph (d)(l) through
(d)(4) of this section, as appropriate.
                                     481

-------
§141.86
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (ill) If a system with a full or partial
waiver adds a  new source of water or
changes any water treatment, the sys-
tem must notify the State in writing in
accordance with §141.90(a)(3). The State
has the authority  to  require  the  sys-
tem to add or modify waiver conditions
(e.g.,  require  recertification  that the
system is free of lead-containing and/or
copper-containing  materials,   require
additional round(s) of monitoring), if it
deems  such  modifications are   nec-
essary to address treatment or source
water changes at the system.
  (iv) If a system with a full or partial
waiver  becomes  aware  that  it is no
longer free  of  lead-containing  or  cop-
per-containing  materials,  as  appro-
priate,  (e.g., as  a  result of new  con-
struction or repairs), the system  shall
notify the  State in writing no  later
than 60 days after becoming aware of
such a change.
  (5) Continued eligibility. If the system
continues to satisfy the requirements
of paragraph (g)(4) of  this section, the
waiver will  be renewed automatically,
unless any of the conditions listed in
paragraph (g)(5)(i) through (g)(5)(iii) of
this section occurs. A  system whose
waiver has been revoked may  re-apply
for a waiver at such time  as  it again
meets  the appropriate materials  and
monitoring criteria of paragraphs (g)(l)
and (g)(2) of this section.
  (i) A system with a full waiver  or a
lead waiver no longer satisfies the ma-
terials criteria of paragraph (g)(l)(i) of
this section or has a 90th percentile
lead level greater than 0.005 mg/L.
  (ii) A system with a full waiver  or a
copper waiver  no longer satisfies the
materials   criteria   of   paragraph
(g)(l)(ii)  of  this section or has a  90th
percentile  copper  level  greater  than
0.65 mg/L.
  (iii) The State notifies the system, in
writing,  that  the waiver has been re-
voked, setting forth the basis of its de-
cision.
  (6) Requirements following waiver rev-
ocation. A system whose full or partial
waiver has been  revoked by the State
is subject  to  the  corrosion  control
treatment  and lead  and  copper  tap
water monitoring requirements, as fol-
lows:
  (i) If the system exceeds the lead and/
or copper action level,  the system must
implement corrosion control treatment
in accordance with the deadlines speci-
fied in §141.81(e), and  any other appli-
cable requirements of this subpart.
  (ii) If the system meets both the lead
and the copper action level, the system
must monitor for  lead and copper at
the tap no  less frequently  than once
every three  years using the reduced
number of  sample sites specified in
paragraph (c) of this section.
  (7) Pre-existing waivers. Small system
waivers approved by the State in writ-
ing prior to April 11, 2000 shall remain
in effect  under  the following  condi-
tions:
  (i) If  the system has demonstrated
that it is both free of lead-containing
and copper-containing materials, as re-
quired by paragraph (g)(l) of this sec-
tion and that  its 90th percentile lead
levels and 90th percentile copper levels
meet the criteria of paragraph (g)(2) of
this section,  the waiver remains in ef-
fect so long as the  system continues to
meet the waiver eligibility  criteria of
paragraph  (g)(5)  of this  section.  The
first round  of tap water monitoring
conducted pursuant to paragraph (g)(4)
of this section shall be completed no
later  than nine  years after the  last
time the system has monitored for lead
and copper at the tap.
  (ii) If the system has met the mate-
rials criteria of paragraph (g)(I) of this
section but has not met the monitoring
criteria of paragraph (g)(2) of this sec-
tion, the system shall conduct a round
of monitoring for  lead and copper at
the tap demonstrating that it  meets
the criteria of paragraph (g)(2) of this
section  no later  than September  30,
2000. Thereafter,  the waiver shall  re-
main  in effect as  long as the  system
meets the continued eligibility criteria
of paragraph (g)(5) of this section. The
first round  of tap water monitoring
conducted pursuant to paragraph (g)(4)
of this section shall be completed no
later than nine years after the round of
monitoring   conducted   pursuant  to
paragraph (g)(2) of this section.

[56 FR 26548, June 7,  1991; 56 PR 32113, July
15, 1991; 57 FR  28788, June 29,  1992; as amend-
ed at 65 FR 2007, Jan. 12, 2000]
                                     482

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.87
§141.87  Monitoring  requirements for
    •water quality parameters.
  All  large  water  systems,  and  all
small- and medium-size  systems that
exceed the lead or copper action level
shall  monitor water quality  param-
eters in addition to lead  and copper in
accordance with this section. The re-
quirements of this section are summa-
rized in the table at the end of this sec-
tion.
  (a) General requirements—(1) Sample
collection methods, (i) Tap samples shall
be  representative  of water  quality
throughout  the   distribution  system
taking into account the number of per-
sons  served, the  different sources of
water, the different treatment methods
employed by the system, and seasonal
variability. Tap  sampling  under this
section is not required to be conducted
at taps targeted  for  lead and copper
sampling  under §141.86(a). [Note: Sys-
tems may find it convenient to conduct
tap sampling for water quality param-
eters at sites used for  coliform sam-
pling under 40 CFB 141.21.]
  (ii) Samples  collected  at  the entry
point(s)  to  the   distribution  system
shall be  from locations  representative
of each source after treatment. If a sys-
tem draws water  from more than one
source and the  sources are  combined
before distribution, the  system must
sample at an entry  point to the dis-
tribution system during periods of nor-
mal operating- conditions  (i.e., when
water is representative  of  all  sources
being used).
  (2)  Number  of  samples,  (i)  Systems
shall collect two  tap samples for appli-
cable water quality parameters during
each monitoring period specified under
paragraphs (b) through (e) of this sec-
tion  from  the  following number  of
sites.
System size (No people served)
>1 00,000
10,001-100,000
3,301 to 10,000
501 to 3,300
101 to 500
S100
No of sites for
water quality
parameters
25
10
3
2
1
1
  (ii)  Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(3)  of this section, systems shall col-
lect  two  samples for each  applicable
water quality parameter at each entry
point to the distribution system during
each  monitoring  period  specified in
paragraph (b) of this section.  During1
each  monitoring  period  specified in
paragraphs (c)-(e) of this  section,  sys-
tems  shall collect one sample for each
applicable water quality parameter at
each  entry point to the  distribution
system.
  (b)  Initial sampling All  large  water
systems shall measure  the  applicable
water quality parameters  as specified
below at taps and at each entry point
to the distribution system during each
six-month monitoring period specified
in §141.86(d)(l). All small and medium-
size systems shall measure the applica-
ble water quality parameters at the lo-
cations specified below during each six-
month  monitoring period  specified in
§141.86(d)(l) during  which  the system
exceeds the lead or copper  action level.
  (1) At taps:
  (i) PH;
  (ii)  Alkalinity;
  (iii) Orthophosphate, when an  inhib-
itor containing a phosphate  compound
is used;
  (iv)  Silica,  when  an  inhibitor con-
taining a silicate compound is used;
  (v) Calcium;
  (vi) Conductivity; and
  (vii) Water temperature.
  (2)  At each entry point to the  dis-
tribution  system: all of  the  applicable
parameters listed in paragraph (b)(l) of
this section.
  (c) Monitoring  after installation of cor-
rosion control. Any large system which
installs   optimal   corrosion  control
treatment pursuant  to  §141.81(d)(4)
shall  measure the water quality param-
eters  at the locations and frequencies
specified below during each  six-month
monitoring    period    specified    in
§141.86(d)(2)(i). Any  small  or medium-
size system which installs  optimal cor-
rosion control treatment shall conduct
such monitoring during each six-month
monitoring    period    specified    in
§141.86(d)(2)(ii) in which the system ex-
ceeds the lead or copper action level.
  (1) At taps, two samples for:
  (i) PH;
  (ii)  Alkalinity;
  (iii) Orthophosphate, when an inhib-
itor containing a phosphate  compound
is used;
                                     483

-------
§141.87
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (iv) Silica,  when  an inhibitor  con-
taining a silicate compound is used;
  (v) Calcium, when  calcium  carbonate
stabilization is used as part  of corro-
sion control.
  (2) Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(3)  of this section,  at  each entry
point to the distribution system,  at
least  one  sample no  less frequently
than every two weeks (biweekly) for:
  (i) PH;
  (ii)  When alkalinity is  adjusted  as
part of optimal  corrosion control,  a
reading  of the dosage rate of the chem-
ical used to adjust alkalinity, and the
alkalinity concentration; and
  (iii) When a corrosion  inhibitor is
used as  part of optimal corrosion  con-
trol, a reading of the dosage rate of the
inhibitor used, and  the concentration
of orthophosphate or silica (whichever
is applicable).
  (3)  Any  ground water  system  can
limit entry point sampling described in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section to those
entry points that are representative of
water quality and  treatment  condi-
tions  throughout the system. If water
from  untreated  ground water sources
mixes with water from treated ground
water sources, the system must mon-
itor for  water quality parameters  both
at representative entry points receiv-
ing treatment and representative entry
points receiving no treatment. Prior to
the start of any monitoring under this
paragraph, the system shall provide to
the State  written information identi-
fying the selected entry points and doc-
umentation,  including information  on
seasonal variability, sufficient to dem-
onstrate that the sites are representa-
tive  of  water quality and treatment
conditions  throughout the system.
  (d)  Monitoring   after State specifies
water quality parameter values for  opti-
mal corrosion  control. After the State
specifies  the values  for  applicable
water quality control parameters re-
flecting  optimal  corrosion  control
treatment  under §141.82(f),  all  large
systems shall measure the applicable
water quality parameters in accord-
ance with paragraph (c) of this section
and determine compliance  with the re-
quirements  of   §141.82(g)   every   six
months  with the  first six-month period
to begin on the date  the State specifies
the  optimal  values under  §141.82(f).
Any small or medium-size system shall
conduct such monitoring during each
six-month period specified in this para-
graph in which the system exceeds  the
lead or copper  action level.  For any
such  small  and medium-size  system
that is subject to a reduced monitoring
frequency pursuant to §141.86(d)(4)  at
the time  of the action  level  exceed-
ance, the end of  the applicable six-
month  period  under  this  paragraph
shall  coincide with the end of the  ap-
plicable   monitoring  period   under
§141.86(d)(4).  Compliance  with.  State-
designated optimal  water  quality  pa-
rameter values shall be determined as
specified under §141.82(g).
  (e) Reduced monitoring.  (1) Any water
system  that maintains  the range  of
values for the  water  quality  param-
eters reflecting optimal corrosion con-
trol treatment during each of two con-
secutive six-month monitoring periods
under  paragraph  (d) of  this  section
shall continue monitoring at the entry
point(s) to the distribution system as
specified in paragraph (c)(2)  of this sec-
tion. Such system may collect two  tap
samples for  applicable water  quality
parameters from the following reduced
number of sites  during each six-month
monitoring period.
System size (No of people served)
>1 00,000 	 ...
10,001 to 100,000
3,301 to 10,000 	
501 to 3,300
101 to 500 	 	
S100 . .
Reduced No
of sites for
water quality
parameters
10
7
3
2
1
1
  (2)(i) Any water system that main-
tains the range of values for the water
quality parameters reflecting  optimal
corrosion  control treatment specified
by  the State under §141.82(f) during
three consecutive years of monitoring
may reduce the frequency with which
it collects the number of tap  samples
for  applicable  water  quality  param-
eters specified in this paragraph (e)(l)
of this section from every six  months
to annually. Any water  system  that
maintains the range  of values for the
water quality parameters reflecting op-
timal  corrosion  control  treatment
specified by the State under §141.82(f)
                                    484

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §141.87
during  three consecutive years  of  an-
nual monitoring' under this paragraph
may reduce the frequency  with which
it collects  the  number of tap samples
for applicable  water  quality  param-
eters specified in paragraph (e)(l) from
annually to every three years.
  (ii) A water system may reduce  the
frequency  with  which  it  collects  tap
samples for applicable  water  quality
parameters specified in paragraph (e)(l)
of this section to every three years if it
demonstrates during two  consecutive
monitoring periods that its tap water
lead level at the 90th percentile is less
than or equal to the PQL for lead speci-
fied in  §141.89  (a)(l)(ii),  that its  tap
water   copper  level  at  the 90th  per-
centile is less than or equal to 0.65 nig/
L for copper in  §141.80(c)(2), and that it
also has maintained the range of values
for the water  quality  parameters  re-
flecting  optimal   corrosion  control
treatment specified by the State under
§141.82(f).
  (3)  A ,water  system  that conducts
sampling annually shall  collect these
samples evenly  throughout the year so
as to reflect seasonal variability.
  (4) Any water system subject  to  the
reduced monitoring  frequency  that
fails to operate at or above the min-
imum value or within the range of val-
ues for the  water quality parameters
specified by the State in §141.82(f)  for
more than nine days in any  six-month
period specified in §141.82(g) shall  re-
sume  distribution  system  tap  water
sampling in accordance with the num-
ber  and  frequency requirements  in
paragraph  (d)  of this  section. Such a
system may resume annual monitoring-
for water quality parameters at the tap
at the reduced number of sites  speci-
fied in paragraph (e)(l) of this section
after  it has  completed two subsequent
consecutive six-month  rounds of moni-
toring that  meet  the  criteria of that
paragraph and/or may resume triennial
monitoring for water  quality param-
eters  at the tap at the reduced number
of sites after it demonstrates  through
subsequent  rounds of monitoring that
it meets  the  criteria  of either para-
graph (e)(2)(i)  or (e)(2)(ii) of this sec-
tion.
  (f)  Additional monitoring by  systems.
The   results of  any monitoring con-
ducted in addition to the minimum  re-
quirements of this section shall be con-
sidered by the  system and the  State in
making any determinations (i.e.,  deter-
mining concentrations  of water quality
parameters) under  this  section  or
§141.82.
         SUMMARY OF MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS 1
Monitoring period
Initial monitoring


After instaHation of corro-
sion control




After State specifies param-
eter values for optimal
corrosion control




Reduced monitoring






Parameters2
pH, afkaknity, orthopnosphate or srfi-
ca3, calcium, conductivity, tempera-
ture.
pK alkalinity, orthopnosphate or sili-
ca3, calcium4
pH, alkalinity, dosage rate and con-
centration (if alkalinity adjusted as
part of corrosion control), irvhibitor
dosage rate and inhibitor residual5
pH, alkalinity, orthophosphate or sili-
ca 3, calcium 4

pH, alkalinity dosage rate and con-
centration (if alkalinity adjusted as
part of corrosion control), inhibitor
dosage rale and inhibitor residual5
pH, alkalinity, orthophosphate or sili-
ca3, calcium4

pH, alkalinity dosage rate and con-
centration (if alkalinity adjusted as
part of corrosion control), inhibitor
dosage rate and inhibitor residual5
Location
Taps and at entry potfrt(s)
to distribution system

Taps

Entry pomt(s) to distribution
system 6


Taps


Entry pomt(s) to distribution
system6


Taps


Entry point(s) to distribution
system6


Frequency
Every 6 months


Every 6 months

No less frequently than
every two weeks


Every 6 months


No less frequently than
every two weeks


Every 6 months, annually7
or every 3 years8, re-
duced number of sites
No less frequently than
every two weeks


 1 Table is for illustrative purposes; consult the text of this section for precise regulatory requirements
 2 Small and medium-size systems have to monitor for water quality parameters only during monitoring periods in which the
system exceeds the lead or copper action level
 3 Orthophosphate must be measured only when an inhibitor containing a phosphate compound is used. Silica must be meas-
ured only when an inhibitor containing silicate compound is used.
 •"Calcium must be measured only when calcium carbonate stabilization is used as part of corrosion control
                                      485

-------
§141.88
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  5 Inhibitor dosage rates and inhibitor residual concentrations (orthophosphate or silica) must be measured only when an inhib-
itor is used
  6 Ground water systems may limit monitoring to representative locations throughout the system
  'Water systems may reduce frequency of monitoring for water quality parameters at the tap from every six months to annually
if they have maintained the range of values for water quality parameters reflecting optimal corrosion control during 3 consecutive
years of monitoring
  8Water systems may further reduce the frequency of monitoring for water quality parameters at the tap from annually to once
every 3 years if they have maintained the range of values for water quality parameters reflecting opttmal corrosion control during
3 consecutive years of annual monitoring Water systems may accelerate to triennial monitoring for water quality parameters at
the tap if they have maintained 90th percentile lead levels less than or equal to 0 005 mg/L, 90th percentile copper levels less
than or equal to 0 65 mg/L, and the range of water quality parameters designated by the State under § 141.82(f) as representing
optimal corrosion control during two consecutive six-month monitoring periods

[56 PR 26548, June 7, 1991; 57 FR 28788,  June 29, 1992,  as amended at 59 FR 33862, June 30, 1994;
65 FR 2010, Jan. 12, 2000]
§ 141.88  Monitoring  requirements for
    lead and copper in source water.
  (a) Sample location, collection methods,
and number of samples. (1) A water sys-
tem that fails to meet the lead or cop-
per action level on the basis  of tap
samples collected in  accordance  with
§141.86  shall collect lead  and  copper
source  water samples  in  accordance
with  the  following-  requirements re-
garding sample  location,  number of
samples, and collection methods:
  (i) Groundwater systems shall take a
minimum of one sample at  every entry
point to the distribution system which
is  representative  of  each  well after
treatment (hereafter called a sampling
point).  The system shall take one sam-
ple at the same sampling point unless
conditions   make  another  sampling
point   more  representative   of  each
source or treatment plant.
  (ii)  Surface water systems shall take
a  minimum  of one  sample at  every
entry point to the distribution system
after  any application of treatment or
in the  distribution system at  a point
which is representative  of each source
after   treatment (hereafter  called  a
sampling point). The system shall take
each  sample  at the same  sampling
point unless  conditions make another
sampling point more representative of
each source or treatment plant.
 NOTE TO PARAGRAPH (A)(l)(n): For the pur-
poses of this  paragraph, surface water sys-
tems include systems with a combination of
surface and ground sources.
  (iii)  If a system  draws  water  from
more than one source and  the sources
are combined before distribution, the
system must sample  at  an  entry point
to the distribution system during peri-
ods  of  normal  operating   conditions
(i.e., when water is representative of all
sources being used).
  (iv) The State may reduce the total
number of samples which must be ana-
lyzed   by   allowing   the   use   of
compositing.  Compositing  of samples
must be  done by certified  laboratory
personnel. Composite samples from a
maximum of five samples are allowed,
provided that if the lead concentration
in  the composite  sample  is  greater
than or equal to 0.001 mg/L or the cop-
per  concentration  is  greater than or
equal to 0.160 mg/L, then either:
  (A) A follow-up sample shall be taken
and analyzed within  14 days at  each
sampling point  included in  the com-
posite; or
  (B) If duplicates of or sufficient quan-
tities from the original samples from
each sampling point  used in the com-
posite are available,  the system  may
use these instead  of resampling.
  (2) Where the results of sampling in-
dicate an exceedance of maximum per-
missible  source  water levels  estab-
lished  under  §141.83(b)(4),   the State
may require that  one additional sample
be collected as soon as possible after
the initial sample  was taken (but not
to exceed two weeks) at the same sam-
pling point. If a  State-required  con-
firmation sample is taken  for lead or
copper, then the  results of the  initial
and confirmation sample shall be aver-
aged in determining  compliance  with
the  State-specified maximum permis-
sible levels. Any  sample value below
the detection limit shall be considered
to be zero. Any value above the detec-
tion limit but below  the PQL shall ei-
ther  be considered  as  the  measured
value  or be  considered  one-half  the
PQL.
  (b) Monitoring frequency after system
exceeds tap  water action level. Any sys-
tem which  exceeds the lead  or copper
action level at the tap shall collect one
                                       486

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.89
source water sample from each entry
point to  the distribution system within
six months after the exceedance.
  (c) Monitoring frequency after installa-
tion of source water treatment. Any sys-
tem which installs source water treat-
ment pursuant to §141.83(a)(3) shall col-
lect an additional source water sample
from  each entry point  to the distribu-
tion  system  during- two consecutive
six-month monitoring  periods by the
deadline specified in §141.83(a)(4).
  (d)  Monitoring frequency after  State
specifies   maximum  permissible   source
water  levels  or determines  that  source
water treatment is not needed. (1) A sys-
tem shall monitor at  the  frequency
specified below  in cases  where  the
State  specifies maximum permissible
source water levels under §141.83(b)(4)
or  determines that the system is not
required to install source water treat-
ment under §141.83(b)(2).
  (i)  A   water  system  using  only
groundwater shall collect samples once
during the  three-year  compliance pe-
riod (as  that term is defined  in §141.2)
in effect when the applicable  State de-
termination  under paragraph (d)(l) of
this section  is made.  Such systems
shall  collect samples once during each
subsequent compliance period.
  (ii)  A  water system using surface
water (or a combination of surface and
groundwater)  shall  collect  samples
once during each year, the first annual
monitoring period to begin on the date
on  which the  applicable State  deter-
mination is  made under paragraph
(d)(l) of this section.
  (2) A system is not required to con-
duct  source  water sampling  for lead
and/or copper if the system meets the
action level  for the specific  contami-
nant in  tap water  samples during the
entire source water sampling period ap-
plicable to the system under paragraph
(d)(l) (i) or (ii) of this section.
  (e) Reduced monitoring frequency. (1) A
water system using only ground water
may reduce the monitoring frequency
for lead  and  copper in source water to
once during each nine-year compliance
cycle  (as that term is defined  in §141.2)
if the system meets  one of the  fol-
lowing criteria:
  (i) The  system demonstrates that fin-
ished  drinking water entering the dis-
tribution system has been maintained
below the maximum  permissible lead
and copper concentrations specified by
the State in §141.83(b)(4) during at least
three  consecutive  compliance periods
under paragraph (d)(l) of this section;
or
  (ii)  The State has  determined that
source water  treatment is  not needed
and the system demonstrates that, dur-
ing at least three consecutive compli-
ance  periods  in which sampling  was
conducted under  paragraph  (d)(l) of
this section, the concentration of lead
in source water was less than or equal
to 0.005 mg/L  and the  concentration of
copper in source water was less than or
equal to 0.65 mg/L.
  (2)  A  water  system  using surface
water (or a  combination  of surface
water and ground  water)  may reduce
the monitoring frequency in paragraph
(d)(l)  of  this section to once  during
each  nine-year  compliance cycle (as
that  term is  defined  in §141.2) if the
system meets one of the following cri-
teria:
  (i) The system demonstrates that fin-
ished  drinking water entering the dis-
tribution system has  been  maintained
below the maximum  permissible lead
and copper concentrations specified by
the State in  §141.83(b)(4) for at  least
three  consecutive years; or
  (ii)  The State has  determined  that
source water  treatment is  not  needed
and the system demonstrates that, dur-
ing at  least three consecutive years,
the concentration  of  lead in  source
water was less  than or equal to  0.005
mg/L  and the concentration of copper
in source water  was less than or equal
to 0.65 mg/L.
  (3) A water system  that  uses a new
source of water is  not eligible  for re-
duced monitoring for  lead  and/or cop-
per until concentrations  in samples
collected  from the new source  during-
three  consecutive monitoring periods
are below the  maximum permissible
lead and  copper concentrations speci-
fied by the State in §141.83(a)(5).

[56 FR 26548,  June 7, 1991; 57 FR 28788 and
28789, June 29, 1992, as amended at 65 FR 2012,
Jan. 12, 2000]

§ 141.89 Analytical methods.
  (a) Analyses for lead, copper, pH, con-
ductivity,     calcium,     alkalinity,
                                     487

-------
§141.90
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
orthophosphate,  silica,  and  tempera-
ture shall be conducted with the meth-
ods in §141.23(k)(l).
  (1) Analyses for alkalinity, calcium,
conductivity, orthophosphate, pH, sili-
ca,  and temperature may be performed
by any person acceptable to the State.
Analyses  under this section for lead
and copper shall only be conducted by
laboratories that have been certified by
EPA or  the  State.  To  obtain  certifi-
cation to conduct analyses for lead and
copper, laboratories must:
  (i) Analyze Performance Evaluation
samples, which  include lead and cop-
per, provided by or acceptable to EPA
or the State at least once a year by
each method for which  the laboratory
desires certification; and
  (ii) Achieve quantitative acceptance
limits as follows:
  (A) For lead: +30 percent of the actual
amount in the Performance Evaluation
sample when the actual  amount  is
greater than or equal  to  0.005 mg/L.
The Practical  Quantitation Level, or
PQL for lead is 0.005 mg/L.
  (B) For Copper: ±10 percent of the ac-
tual amount in  the Performance Eval-
uation sample when  the actual amount
is greater than  or equal to 0.050 mg/L.
The Practical  Quantitation Level, or
PQL for copper is 0.050 mg/L.
  (ill)  Achieve  the  method  detection
limit for lead of 0.001 mg/L according to
the procedures  in appendix B  of part
136  of this title. This need only be ac-
complished  if the laboratory will be
processing  source  water  composite
samples under §141.88(a)(l)(iii).
  (iv) Be currently certified by EPA or
the State to perform analyses to the
specifications described  in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section.
  (2) States have the authority to allow
the use of previously collected moni-
toring data for purposes of monitoring,
if the data were collected and analyzed
in accordance with the requirements of
this subpart.
  (3) All lead and copper levels meas-
ured between the PQL  and MDL must
be either reported as measured  or they
can be reported as  one-half the PQL
specified for lead and copper in para-
graph (a)(l)(ii)  of this section. All lev-
els  below the  lead  and copper MDLs
must be reported as zero.
  (4) All  copper levels measured be-
tween  the PQL and the MDL must be
either  reported as  measured or they
can be reported as one-half the PQL
(0.025 mg/L). All levels below the copper
MDL must be reported as zero.
  (b) [Reserved]

[56 FR 26548, June 7, 1991, as amended at 57
FR 28789, June 29, 1992; 57 FR 31847,  July 17,
1992; 59 FR 33863, June 30, 1994;  59 FR 62470,
Dec. 5,  1994; 64 FR 67466, Dec. 1, 1999; 65 FR
2012, Jan. 12, 2000]

§ 141.90 Reporting requirements.
  All water systems shall  report all  of
the following information  to the State
in accordance with this section.
  (a)  Reporting  requirements for  tap
water monitoring for lead and copper and
for water  quality parameter monitoring.
(1) Except  as  provided in  paragraph
(a)(l)(viii) of this section,  a water sys-
tem shall report the information speci-
fied  below for all tap  water samples
specified  in §141.86  and for all water
quality parameter samples specified  in
§141.87  within  the  first 10 days  fol-
lowing the end  of each applicable moni-
toring period  specified  in  §141.86 and
§141.87  (i.e.,  every six months,  annu-
ally, every 3 years, or every 9 years):
  (i) The  results of all tap samples for
lead and copper including the location
of each site  and  the  criteria  under
§141.86(a)  (3),  (4),  (5),  (6),  and/or (7)
under  which the site was selected for
the system's sampling pool;
  (ii)   Documentation   for  each  tap
water lead or copper sample for which
the water system requests invalidation
pursuant to §141.86(f>(2);
  (iii) [Reserved]
  (iv) The 90th  percentile lead and cop-
per  concentrations  measured  from
among  all lead and copper tap water
samples collected  during each  moni-
toring period (calculated in accordance
with §141.80(c)(3)), unless the State cal-
culates the  system's  90th  percentile
lead and copper levels under paragraph
(h) of this section;
  (v) With the  exception of initial tap
sampling    conducted   pursuant    to
§141.86(d)(l), the system shall designate
any site which was not sampled  during
previous  monitoring periods,  and in-
clude an  explanation of why sampling
sites have changed;
                                     488

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.90
  (vi) The results of all tap samples for
pH,  and where applicable, alkalinity,
calcium,  conductivity,  temperature,
and  orthophosphate or silica collected
under § 141.87 (bHe);
  (vii) The  results of all samples col-
lected at the entry point(s) to the dis-
tribution system for applicable water
quality parameters under  §141.87 (b)-
(e);
  (viii) A water system shall report the
results of all water quality parameter
samples   collected   under  §141.87(c)
through (f) during each six-month mon-
itoring period  specified in  §141.87(d)
within the  first 10 days following the
end of the monitoring period unless the
State has specified a more frequent re-
porting requirement.
  (2) For a  non-transient non-commu-
nity  water  system,  or a  community
water system meeting the criteria of
§§141.85(c)(7)(i)  and (ii), that does not
have enough  taps  that can provide
first-draw samples, the  system must ei-
ther:
  (i) Provide written documentation to
the  State  identifying  standing times
and locations for enough non-first-draw
samples  to  make up its sampling pool
under  §141.86(b)(5) by the start of the
first   applicable  monitoring  period
under  §141.86(d) that commences  after
April  11, 2000,  unless  the  State has
waived prior  State approval of  non-
first-draw sample sites  selected by the
system pursuant to §141.86(b)(5); or
  (ii) If the  State has waived prior ap-
proval of non-first-draw sample  sites
selected  by the  system,  identify, in
writing, each site that did not meet the
six-hour  minimum standing  time and
the  length  of standing time for that
particular substitute sample collected
pursuant  to §141.86(b)(5) and include
this  information with the lead and cop-
per tap sample  results required to be
submitted   pursuant   to   paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section.
  (3) No later than 60 days after the ad-
dition of a new source or any change in
water treatment, unless the  State re-
quires earlier notification, a water sys-
tem  deemed to have optimized corro-
sion  control under §141.81(b)(3), a water
system subject to reduced  monitoring
pursuant to §141.86(d)(4),  or a water
system subject to a monitoring waiver
pursuant to §141.86(g), shall send  writ-
ten  documentation to the  State de-
scribing the change. In those instances
where  prior  State  approval   of  the
treatment change or new source is not
required, water systems are encouraged
to provide the notification to the State
beforehand to  minimize  the risk the
treatment change  or new source will
adversely affect optimal corrosion con-
trol.
  (4) Any small system applying for a
monitoring waiver under §141.86(g), or
subject to a waiver granted pursuant to
§141.86(g)(3), shall provide the following
information to the State in writing by
the specified deadline:
  (i) By the start of the first applicable
monitoring period  in §141.86(d), any
small  water  system applying  for  a
monitoring waiver  shall  provide  the
documentation   required   to  dem-
onstrate that it meets the waiver cri-
teria of §§141.86(g)(l) and (2).
  (ii) No later than nine years after the
monitoring previously conducted pur-
suant to §141.86(g)(2) or §141.86(g)(4)(i),
each small system desiring to maintain
its monitoring waiver shall provide the
information required by §§141.86(g)(4)(i)
and (ii).
  (iii) No later than 60 days after it be-
comes aware that it is no longer free of
lead-containing   and/or   copper-con-
taining material, as  appropriate,  each
small system with a monitoring waiver
shall provide  written  notification  to
the  State,  setting   forth  the  cir-
cumstances resulting in  the lead-con-
taining and/or copper-containing mate-
rials being introduced into the system
and what corrective action, if any, the
system  plans  to remove these mate-
rials.
  (iv) By October 10, 2000, any small
system  with a waiver granted  prior to
April 11,  2000 and that  has not pre-
viously  met   the   requirements  of
§141.86(g)(2) shall provide the informa-
tion required by that paragraph.
  (5) Bach ground  water system  that
limits water quality parameter moni-
toring to a subset of entry points under
§141.87(c)(3) shall provide, by the com-
mencement of such monitoring, writ-
ten correspondence to  the State  that
identifies the selected entry points and
                                    489

-------
§141.90
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
includes information sufficient to dem-
onstrate that the sites are representa-
tive of water quality and  treatment
conditions throughout the system.
  (b) Source water monitoring reporting
requirements.  (1) A water system shall
report  the  sampling  results for  all
source water  samples collected in ac-
cordance with §141.88 within the first 10
days following the end of each source
water monitoring period (i.e., annually,
per compliance period, per compliance
cycle) specified in § 141.88.
  (2) With the exception  of the first
round  of  source  water  sampling con-
ducted pursuant  to  §141.88(b), the sys-
tem shall specify any site which was
not  sampled  during  previous  moni-
toring periods, and include  an expla-
nation of why the sampling point has
changed.
  (c) Corrosion control  treatment report-
ing  requirements.  By   the  applicable
dates under §141.81, systems shall re-
port the following information:
  (1) For  systems demonstrating that
they have already optimized corrosion
control,   information  required   in
§141.81(b) (2) or (3).
  (2) For systems required to optimize
corrosion control,  their recommenda-
tion regarding optimal  corrosion con-
trol treatment under §141.82(a).
  (3) For systems required to evaluate
the effectiveness  of corrosion control
treatments under §141.82(c),  the  infor-
mation required by that paragraph.
  (4) For systems required  to  install
optimal  corrosion control designated
by  the State  under  §141.82(d), a  letter
certifying that the system  has com-
pleted installing that treatment.
  (d) Source water treatment reporting re-
quirements. By the applicable dates in
§141.83, systems  shall provide the fol-
lowing information to  the State:
  (1)  If  required under  §141.83(b)(l),
their    recommendation    regarding
source water treatment;
  (2) For systems required  to  install
source    water   treatment    under
§141.83(b)(2),  a letter certifying that
the  system  has  completed  installing
the treatment designated by the State
within 24 months after  the  State des-
ignated the treatment.
  (e) Lead service  line replacement report-
ing requirements.  Systems  shall report
the following information  to the State
to demonstrate compliance with the re-
quirements of § 141.84:
  (1) Within 12 months after a  system
exceeds the lead action level in sam-
pling referred to in §141.84(a), the sys-
tem shall  demonstrate  in  writing to
the State that it has conducted a mate-
rial evaluation, including the evalua-
tion in §141.86(a), to identify the initial
number of lead service lines in its  dis-
tribution system, and shall provide the
State with  the system's schedule for
replacing annually at least 7 percent of
the initial number of lead service lines
in its distribution system.
  (2) Within 12 months after a  system
exceeds the lead action level in sam-
pling referred  to  in  §141.84(a),   and
every 12 months thereafter, the  system
shall demonstrate to the State in writ-
ing that the system has either:
  (i)  Replaced  in  the  previous  12
months at least 7 percent of the initial
lead service lines (or a greater number
of lines specified by the State under
§141.84(e)) in its distribution system, or
  (ii) Conducted sampling which dem-
onstrates that the  lead concentration
in all service line samples from an indi-
vidual  line(s),   taken  pursuant   to
§141.86(b)(3),  is  less than  or  equal to
0.015  mg/L. In  such cases,  the total
number of  lines replaced and/or which
meet the  criteria  in  §141.84(c) shall
equal at least  7 percent of the initial
number of lead lines identified under
paragraph  (a) of this section (or  the
percentage specified by the State under
§141.84(e)).
  (3) The annual letter submitted to
the State under paragraph (e)(2) of this
section shall contain the following in-
formation:
  (i) The number of lead service lines
scheduled to  be replaced  during  the
previous year of the system's replace-
ment schedule;
  (ii) The number and location of each
lead service line replaced  during  the
previous year of the system's replace-
ment schedule;
  (iii) If measured, the water lead con-
centration  and  location  of each lead
service   line  sampled,   the sampling
method, and the date of sampling.
  (4) Any system which collects lead
service  line samples following  partial
lead service line replacement required
by §141.84  shall report the results to
                                     490

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.91
the  State  within the  first ten days of
the  month  following the  month  in
which the system receives the labora-
tory results, or  as specified by  the
State. States, at their discretion  may
eliminate  this  requirement to  report
these  monitoring  results.   Systems
shall also  report  any  additional infor-
mation as specified by the State, and
in a time and manner prescribed by the
State, to  verify that all partial  lead
service  line  replacement  activities
have taken place.
  (f) Public education program  reporting
requirements. (1) Any water system  that
is subject  to the public  education re-
quirements in §141.85  shall, within ten
days after the  end of each period in
which the system is  required to  per-
form public education tasks in accord-
ance with  §141.85(c), send written docu-
mentation to the State that contains:
  (i) A demonstration that the system
has  delivered the public education ma-
terials that meet the  content require-
ments in §141.85(a) and (b) and the de-
livery requirements in §141.85(c); and
  (ii) A list of all the newspapers, radio
stations, television stations, and facili-
ties  and  organizations  to which  the
system delivered public education ma-
terials during the period in which the
system was required to perform public
education tasks.
  (2)  Unless  required  by the  State, a
system that previously has submitted
the information required by paragraph
(f)(l)(ii) of this  section need not resub-
mit  the information required  by para-
graph (f)(l)(ii) of this section, as  long
as there have been  no changes  in the
distribution  list and  the system  cer-
tifies that the public  education mate-
rials were  distributed  to  the same list
submitted  previously.
  (g) Reporting of additional monitoring
data. Any  system which  collects sam-
pling data in addition to  that  required
by this subpart  shall report the results
to the State within the first ten days
following  the  end  of the  applicable
monitoring period under §§141.86, 141.87
and 141.88 during which the samples are
collected.
  (h) Reporting  of 90th percentile  lead
and  copper  concentrations where   the
State calculates a system's  90th percentile
concentrations. A water system  is not
required  to report the 90th percentile
lead and copper concentrations meas-
ured from among- all lead and copper
tap  water  samples  collected during
each monitoring period, as required by
paragraph (a)(l)(iv) of this section if:
  (1) The State has previously notified
the water system that it will calculate
the water system's 90th percentile lead
and  copper  concentrations,  based on
the lead and  copper tap results  sub-
mitted pursuant to paragraph (h)(2)(i)
of this section, and has specified a date
before the end of the applicable moni-
toring  period  by  which the  system
must provide  the results of lead and
copper tap water samples;
  (2) The system has provided the fol-
lowing information to the State by the
date  specified in paragraph  (h)(l)  of
this section:
  (i) The results of all  tap samples for
lead and copper including the location
of each site and  the  criteria under
§141.86(a)(3),  (4), (5), (6), and/or (7) under
which the site  was selected for the sys-
tem's sampling pool,  pursuant to  para-
graph (a)(l)(i) of this  section; and
  (ii)  An  identification  of  sampling
sites utilized during  the current moni-
toring period  that were  not sampled
during  previous monitoring  periods,
and an explanation why sampling sites
have changed; and
  (3) The State has provided the results
of the 90th percentile lead and copper
calculations, in writing, to the water
system before the end  of the  moni-
toring period.

[56 FR 26548, June 7, 1991;  57 FR 28789,  June
29, 1992, as amended at 59 FR 33864, June 30,
1994; 65 FR 2012, Jan. 12, 2000]

§ 141.91  Recordkeeping requirements.
  Any  system  subject  to the require-
ments  of this  subpart  shall retain on
its  premises original  records of all
sampling data and  analyses, reports,
surveys,  letters,  evaluations, sched-
ules,  State  determinations,  and  any
other information required by §§141.81
through 141.88.  Each water system shall
retain the records required by this sec-
tion for no fewer than 12 years.
                                     491

-------
§141.100
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Subpart J—Use of Non-Centralized
         Treatment Devices

  SOURCE: 52 FB 25716, July 8, 1987, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 141.100 Criteria and  procedures for
   public water systems using point-of-
   entry devices.
  (a)  Public  water systems may  use
point-of-entry devices to comply with
maximum contaminant levels only if
they  meet the requirements  of this
section.
  (b)  It  is the responsibility  of  the
public water  system  to operate  and
maintain the point-of-entry treatment
system.
  (c) The public water system must de-
velop and obtain State approval for a
monitoring plan before point-of-entry
devices are installed  for  compliance.
Under the plan approved by the State,
point-of-entry  devices   must  provide
health protection equivalent to central
water  treatment.  "Equivalent"  means
that the water would meet all national
primary drinking-  water  regulations
and  would be  of  acceptable  quality
similar to water distributed by  a well-
operated central treatment plant.  In
addition to the VOCs, monitoring must
include physical measurements and ob-
servations  such as total flow treated
and mechanical condition of the treat-
ment equipment.
  (d)  Effective  technology  must  be
properly applied under a plan approved
by the State  and the  microbiological
safety of the  water  must  be  main-
tained.
  (1) The State  must require adequate
certification of performance, field test-
ing, and, if not included in the  certifi-
cation process, a rigorous engineering
design review  of the point-of-entry de-
vices.
  (2) The design and application of the
point-of-entry  devices  must  consider
the    tendency   for   increase   in
heterotrophic  bacteria concentrations
in water treated with activated carbon.
It may be necessary  to use  frequent
backwashing,  post-contactor  disinfec-
tion,  and Heterotrophic Plate  Count
monitoring to  ensure that the  micro-
biological safety of the water  is  not
compromised.
  (e) All consumers shall be protected.
Every  building  connected to the sys-
tem must have a point-of-entry device
installed,  maintained, and  adequately
monitored. The  State must be assured
that every building is subject to treat-
ment and  monitoring,  and that  the
rights and responsibilities of the public
water  system  customer  convey with
title upon sale of property.

[52 FR 25716, July 8, 1987; 53 FR 25111, July 1,
1988]

§ 141.101 Use of bottled water.

  Public water systems  shall  not  use
bottled water  to  achieve compliance
with an MCL.  Bottled water  may  be
used on a temporary basis to avoid un-
reasonable risk to health.

[63 FR 31934, June 11, 1998]

 Subpart K—Treatment Techniques

  SOURCE: 56 FB 3594, Jan. 30, 1991,  unless
otherwise noted.

§ 141.110 General requirements.

  The requirements of subpart K of this
part   constitute   national  primary
drinking water regulations. These reg-
ulations  establish  treatment  tech-
niques in lieu  of maximum contami-
nant levels for  specified  contaminants.

§ 141.111 Treatment techniques for ac-
    rylamide and epichlorohydrin.

  Each public water system must cer-
tify annually in writing to the  State
(using  third party or manufacturer's
certification)  that  when  acrylamide
and epichlorohydrin are  used in drink-
ing water systems, the combination (or
product) of dose and monomer level
does not exceed the levels specified as
follows:

Acrylamide=0.05% dosed at 1 ppm (or equiva-
   lent)
Epichlorohydrin=0.01% dosed at 20 ppm  (or
   equivalent)

Certifications can rely on manufactur-
ers or third parties, as approved by the
State.
                                     492

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.131
Subpart  L—Disinfectant Residuals,
     Disjnfection  Byproducts,  and
     Disinfection Byproduct Precur-
     sors

§ 141.130  General requirements.
  (a) The  requirements of this subpart
L constitute national primary drinking
water regulations.
  (1) The regulations in this subpart es-
tablish criteria under  which commu-
nity water systems  (CWSs)  and  non-
transient,  noncommunity water  sys-
tems (NTNCWSs) which add a chemical
disinfectant to the water in any part of
the drinking water treatment process
must modify  their practices to meet
MCLs and MRDLs in §§141.64  and 141.65,
respectively, and must meet  the treat-
ment technique requirements  for  dis-
infection   byproduct   precursors   in
§141.135.
  (2) The regulations in this subpart es-
tablish criteria under which transient
NCWSs that use chlorine dioxide  as  a
disinfectant  or oxidant must  modify
their practices to meet the  MBDL for
chlorine dioxide in §141.65.
  (3) EPA has  established  MCLs for
TTHM and HAA5 and treatment tech-
nique requirements for disinfection by-
product precursors to limit  the levels
of known and unknown disinfection by-
products  which  may  have  adverse
health effects. These disinfection by-
products   may  include   chloroform;
bromodichloromethane;
dibromochloromethane;    bromoform;
dichloroacetic acid; and trichloroacetic
acid.
  (b)  Compliance dates. (1)  CWSs  and
NTNCWSs. Unless otherwise noted, sys-
tems must  comply with the require-
ments  of this subpart as follows.  Sub-
part H systems serving 10,000 or more
persons must comply  with this subpart
beginning January 1, 2002. Subpart H
systems serving fewer than  10,000 per-
sons and  systems  using  only  ground
water not under the direct influence of
surface water must comply  with this
subpart beginning January 1,  2004.
  (2) Transient  NCWSs. Subpart  H sys-
tems serving 10,000 or  more persons and
using chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant
or oxidant must comply with  any re-
quirements for chlorine dioxide  in this
subpart beginning January 1,  2002.  Sub-
part H systems serving  fewer than
10,000 persons and using chlorine diox-
ide as a  disinfectant or oxidant and
systems using only ground water not
under  the direct influence of surface
water and using  chlorine dioxide as a
disinfectant  or  oxidant must comply
with any  requirements  for chlorine di-
oxide in this subpart beginning  Janu-
ary 1, 2004.
  (c) Each CWS and NTNCWS regulated
under  paragraph  (a)  of this section
must be  operated  by  qualified per-
sonnel  who   meet  the requirements
specified by the State and are included
in a State register of qualified opera-
tors.
  (d)  Control  of  disinfectant  residuals.
Notwithstanding- the MRDLs in §141.65.
systems   may  increase residual dis-
infectant  levels in the distribution sys-
tem of chlorine or cMoramines (taut not
chlorine dioxide) to a level and for  a
time   necessary   to  protect  public
health,  to  address  specific micro-
biological   contamination    problems
caused by circumstances such as. but
not limited to, distribution line breaks,
storm run-off events, source water con-
tamination events,  or cross-connection
events.

[63 FR 69466, Dec. 16, 1998, as amended at 66
FR 3776, Jan. 16, 2001]

§ 141.131   Analytical requirements.
  (a)  General. (1) Systems must use
only the analytical method(s)  specified
in this section, or  otherwise  approved
by EPA for monitoring under  this sub-
part, to demonstrate compliance with
the requirements of this subpart.  These
methods are  effective  for compliance
monitoring February 16, 1999.
  (2) The  following documents are in-
corporated by reference. The  Director
of the Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference  in accord-
ance with 5  U.S.C.  552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.  Copies may be  inspected  at
EPA's  Drinking- Water Docket, 401  M
St., SW.,  Washington, DC  20460,  or  at
the National  Archives and Records Ad-
ministration  (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go  to:  http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
co de	of_federa I	reg u lations/
ibr  locations.html. EPA Method 552.1 is
                                    493

-------
§141.131
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
in Methods for the Determination of Or-
ganic Compounds in Drinking Water-Sup-
plement II, USEPA, August 1992, EPA/
600/R-92/129 (available through National
Information Technical Service  (NTIS),
PB92-207703).  EPA Methods 502.2, 524.2,
551.1, and 552.2 are  in Methods for the
Determination of Organic  Compounds in
Drinking  Water-Supplement III, USEPA,
August  1995, EPA/600/R-95/131.  (avail-
able through NTIS, PB95-261616).  EPA
Method 300.0 is in Methods for the Deter-
mination of Inorganic Substances in Envi-
ronmental  Samples,  USEPA,  August
1993,     EPA/600/R-93/100.     (available
through NTIS, PB94-121811). EPA Meth-
od 300.1 is titled USEPA Method 300.1,
Determination  of Inorganic  Anions  in
Drinking  Water  by Ion Chromatography,
Revision 1.0, USEPA, 1997, EPA/600/R-98/
118  (available  through  NTIS,  PB98-
169196); also available  from: Chemical
Exposure   Research   Branch,   Micro-
biological & Chemical Exposure Assess-
ment Research Division, National Ex-
posure  Research Laboratory, U.S. En-
vironmental  Protection  Agency,  Cin-
cinnati, OH 45268, Fax Number:  513-569-
7757,   Phone   number:   513-569-7586.
Standard Methods 4500-C1 D, 4500-C1 E,
4500-01 P, 4500-C1 G, 4500-C1 H, 4500-C1
I, 4500-C1O2 D, 4500-C1C-2 E, 6251 B, and
5910 B shall be followed in accordance
with Standard Methods for the Examina-
tion of Water and Wastewater, 19th Edi-
tion, American Public Health Associa-
tion, 1995; copies may be obtained from
the  American Public  Health  Associa-
tion, 1015 Fifteenth Street, NW, Wash-
ington,  DC 20005.  Standard  Methods
5310 B, 5310 C, and 5310 D shall be fol-
lowed  in accordance  with the Supple-
ment to  the  19th  Edition of Standard
Methods  for the Examination of Water
and  Wastewater,   American  Public
Health Association, 1996; copies may be
obtained from the  American Public
Health   Association,  1015   Fifteenth
Street,   NW,  Washington,  DC 20005.
ASTM Method D 1253-86  shall be fol-
lowed  in accordance  with the Annual
Book of ASTM Standards,  Volume 11.01,
American Society for Testing and Ma-
terials, 1996 edition; copies may be ob-
tained from the American Society for
Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West Conshohoken, PA 19428.
  (b) Disinfection byproducts.  (1)  Sys-
tems must measure disinfection  by-
products by the methods (as modified
by  the  footnotes)  listed in  the fol-
lowing table:
         APPROVED METHODS FOR DISINFECTION BYPRODUCT COMPLIANCE MONITORING
Methodology2
P&T/QC/EICD & PID
P&T/GC/MS
LLE/GC/ECD 	
LLE/GC/ECD
SPE/GC/ECD
LLE/GC/ECD
Amperometric Titra-
tion.
1C
1C
EPA meth-
od
35022
5242
551 1

5521
5522


3000
3001
Standard method



6251 B


4500-CIO2 E



Byproduct measured 1
TTHM
X
X
X







HAAS



X
X
X




Chlorite4






X

X
X
Bromate









X
  1X indicates method is approved (or measuring specified disinfection byproduct
  2P&T-purge and trap, GC=gas Chromatography, EICD = electrolytic conductivity detector, PID = photoionization detector,
MS = mass spectrometer, LLE = liquid/liquid extraction,  ECD = electron  capture detector, SPE = solid phase extractor, 1C = ion
Chromatography
  3 If TTHMs are the only analytes being measured in the sample, then a PID is not required
  * Amperometnc titration may be used for routine daily monitonng ot chlorite at the entrance to the distribution system, as pre-
scribed in §141.132(b)(2)(i)(A). Ion Chromatography must be used for routine monthly monitoring of chlorite and additional moni-
toring of chlorite in the distribution system, as prescribed in §141.132(b)(2)(i)(B) and (b)(2)(n)
  (2)  Analysis  under  this  section for
disinfection byproducts must be con-
ducted by  laboratories that have re-
ceived  certification  by  EPA  or  the
State, except  as specified under para-
graph (b)(3) of this section.  To receive
certification to  conduct analyses for
the contaminants in §141.64(a), the lab-
oratory  must carry  out annual anal-
yses  of  performance  evaluation  (PE)
samples approved by EPA or the State.
In these analyses of PE samples,  the
laboratory must achieve quantitative
results within the acceptance limit on
                                       494

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.131
a minimum of 80% of the analytes in-
cluded in each PE sample. The accept-
ance  limit is defined  as  the  95% con-
fidence interval calculated around the
mean of the PE study data between a
maximum and minimum  acceptance
limit of  +/-50%  and  +/-15%  of the
study mean.
  (3) A party approved by EPA or the
State  must  measure  daily  chlorite
samples at the  entrance to the  dis-
tribution system.
  (c) Disinfectant residuals. (1) Systems
must  measure   residual  disinfectant
concentrations for free chlorine, com-
bined chlorine (chloramines), and chlo-
rine dioxide by the methods listed in
the following table:
         APPROVED METHODS FOR DISINFECTANT RESIDUAL COMPLIANCE MONITORING
Methodology
Amperometnc Titra-
tion
Low Level Ampero-
metnc Titration
DPD Ferrous
Titnmetric
DPD Colonmetric
Syringaldazin e
(FACTS)
lodometric Elec-
trode
DPD
Amperometnc
Method II
Standard
method
4500-CI D

4500-CI E

4500-CI F

4500-CI G
4500-CI H

4500-CI 1

4500-CIO2 D
4500-CI02 E

ASTM method
D 1253-86













Residual Measured1
Free
chlorine
X



X

X
X






Combined
chlorine
X



X

X







Total
chlorine
X

X

X

X


X




Chlorine
dioxide











X
X

  1 X indicates method is approved for measuring specified disinfectant residual
  (2) If approved by the State, systems
may also measure residual disinfectant
concentrations      for      chlorine,
chloramines, and  chlorine  dioxide by
using DPD colorimetric test kits.
  (3) A party approved by EPA or the
State must measure residual disinfect-
ant concentration.
  (d) Additional analytical methods. Sys-
tems  required  to  analyze parameters
not included in paragraphs (b) and (c)
of this section must use  the following
methods. A party  approved by  EPA or
the State must measure  these param-
eters.
  (1) Alkalinity. All methods allowed in
§141.89(a) for measuring alkalinity.
  (2) Bromide. EPA Method 300.0 or EPA
Method 300.1.
  (3)  Total  Organic  Carbon   (TOC).
Standard  Method 5310 B (High-Tem-
perature   Combustion   Method)   or
Standard Method 5310 C (Persulfate-Ul-
traviolet or  Heated-Persulfate  Oxida-
tion Method) or Standard Method 5310
D  (Wet-Oxidation  Method). TOC sam-
ples may not be filtered prior to anal-
ysis. TOC samples must either  be ana-
lyzed  or must  be  acidified  to  achieve
pH less than 2.0 by minimal addition of
phosphoric or sulfuric acid as soon as
practical after sampling, not to exceed
24 hours. Acidified TOC samples must
be analyzed within 28 days.
  (4)   Specific  Ultraviolet  Absorbance
(SUVA). SUVA is equal to the UV ab-
sorption at 254nm (TJV254) (measured in
m-1  divided by the dissolved organic
carbon (DOC)  concentration (measured
as mg/L). In order to determine SUVA,
it is necessary to separately measure
UV254  and  DOC.  When  determining
SUVA, systems must use the methods
stipulated in paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this
section to measure DOC and the meth-
od stipulated  in paragraph  (d)(4)(ii) of
this  section to measure  UV254 SUVA
must be determined on water prior to
the addition  of disinfectants/oxidants
by the system. DOC  and UV254 samples
used to determine a SUVA value must
be taken at the same time  and at the
same location.
  (i)  Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC).
Standard  Method 5310 B (High-Tem-
perature   Combustion   Method)   or
                                    495

-------
§141.132
                                40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Standard Method 5310 C (Persulfate-Ul-
traviolet  or Heated-Persulfate Oxida-
tion Method) or Standard Method 5310
D  (Wet-Oxidation  Method).  Prior  to
analysis, DOC samples must be filtered
throug-h a 0.45 um pore-diameter filter.
Water passed through  the filter  prior
to filtration of the sample must  serve
as  the  filtered  blank.  This  filtered
blank must  be analyzed  using proce-
dures identical  to those used for  anal-
ysis of the samples and must meet the
following criteria: DOC < 0.5 mg/L. DOC
samples must be  filtered through the
0.45  um pore-diameter  filter prior  to
acidification. DOC samples must either
be  analyzed or must  be acidified  to
achieve pH less  than 2.0 by minimal ad-
dition of phosphoric or sulfuric acid  as
soon as practical after sampling-, not to
exceed 48 hours. Acidified DOC samples
must be analyzed within 28 days.
  (ii) Ultraviolet  Absorption at 254 nm
(UV254). Method 5910 B (Ultraviolet Ab-
sorption Method). UV absorption  must
be measured at  253.7 nm (may be round-
ed  off  to 254 nm). Prior to  analysis,
UV254 samples must be filtered through
a 0.45 um pore-diameter filter. The pH
of UV254 samples  may not be adjusted.
Samples  must be  analyzed  as soon  as
practical after sampling, not to exceed
48 hours.
  (5)   pH.  All   methods   allowed  in
§141.23(k)(l) for  measuring pH.
[63 FR 69466, Dec. 16, 1998, as amended at 66
PR 3776, Jan. 16, 2001]
                     § 141.132  Monitoring requirements.
                       (a) General requirements. (1) Systems
                     must take all samples during normal
                     operating conditions.
                       (2) Systems  may  consider  multiple
                     wells drawing water from a single aqui-
                     fer as one treatment  plant for  deter-
                     mining the minimum number of TTHM
                     and HAA5 samples required, with State
                     approval  in  accordance  with  criteria
                     developed  under  §142.16(h)(5)  of this
                     chapter.
                       (3) Failure to monitor in accordance
                     with the  monitoring plan  required
                     under paragraph (f) of this section is a
                     monitoring- violation.
                       (4) Failure to monitor will be treated
                     as a violation for the entire period cov-
                     ered by the annual average where com-
                     pliance is  based on  a running annual
                     average of monthly  or quarterly sam-
                     ples or averages and the  system's fail-
                     ure  to monitor makes it  impossible to
                     determine  compliance with MCLs  or
                     MBDLs.
                       (5) Systems  may use only data  col-
                     lected under the provisions of this sub-
                     part or subpart M  of this part to qual-
                     ify for reduced monitoring.
                       (b) Monitoring requirements for  dis-
                     infection   byproducts—(1)   TTHMs  and
                     HAAS—(i) Routine  monitoring.  Systems
                     must monitor at  the frequency indi-
                     cated in the following table:
                  ROUTINE MONITORING FREQUENCY FOR TTHM AND HAAS
      Type of system
Minimum monitoring frequency
                                                   Sample location in the distribution system
Subpart H system serving at
  least 10,000 persons
Subpart H system serving from
  500 to 9,999 persons.
Subpart H system serving fewer
  than 500 persons
System using only ground
  water not under direct influ-
  ence of surface water using
  chemical disinfectant and
  serving at least 10,000 per-
  sons
Four water samples per quar-
 ter per treatment plant
One water sample per quarter
 per treatment plant
One sample per year per
 treatment plant during
 month of warmest water
 temperature.
One water sample per quarter
 pel treatment plant2.
At least 25 percent of all samples collected each quarter at
 locations representing maximum residence time Remain-
 ing samples taken  at locations representative of at least
 average residence time in the distribution system and rep-
 resenting the entire distribution system, taking into account
 number of persons  served, different sources of water, and
 different treatment methods 1
Locations representing maximum residence time 1

Locations representing  maximum residence  time1 If the
 sample (or average of annual samples, if more than one
 sample is taken) exceeds the MCL, the system must in-
 crease monitoring to one sample per treatment plant per
 quarter, taken at a point reflecting the maximum residence
 time in the distribution system, until the system meets cri-
 teria in paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of this section
Locations representing maximum residence time 1
                                         496

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §141.132
             ROUTINE MONITORING FREQUENCY FOR TTHM AND HAAS—Continued
Type of system
System using only ground
water not under direct influ-
ence of surface water using
chemical disinfectant and
serving fewer than 10,000
persons
Minimum monitoring frequency
One sample per year per
treatment plant2 during
month of warmest water
temperature
Sample location in the distribution system
Locations representing maximum residence time 1 If the
sample (or average of annual samples, if more than one
sample is taken) exceeds the MCL, the system must in-
crease monitoring to one sample per treatment plant per
quarter, taken at a point reflecting the maximum residence
time in the distribution system, until the system meets cri-
teria in paragraph (b)(1 )(iv) of this section
  11f a system elects to sample more frequently than the minimum required, at least 25 percent of all samples collected each
quarter (including those taken in excess of the required frequency) must be taken at locations that represent the maximum resi-
dence time of the water in the distribution system The remaining samples must be taken at locations representative of at least
average residence time in the distribution system
  2 Multiple wells drawing water from a single aquifer may be considered one treatment plant for determining the minimum num-
ber of samples required, with State approval in accordance with criteria developed under § 142 16(h)(5) of this chapter
  (ii) Systems may reduce monitoring,
except as  otherwise  provided,  in ac-
cordance with the following table:
                 REDUCED MONITORING FREQUENCY FOR TTHM AND HAAS
If you are a
Subpart H system serving at
least 1 0,000 persons which
has a source water annual
average TOC level, before
any treatment, <4 0 mg/L.
Subpart H system serving from
500 to 9,999 persons which
has a source water annual
average TOC level, before
any treatment, <4 0 mg/L

System using only ground
water not under direct influ-
ence of surface water using
chemical disinfectant and
serving at least 10,000 per-
sons
System using only ground
water not under direct influ-
ence of surface water using
chemical disinfectant and
serving fewer than 10,000
persons


You may reduce monitoring if
you have monitored at least
one year and your
TTHM annual average <0 040
mg/L and HAAS annual av-
erage <0 030 mg/L


TTHM annual average <0 040
mg/L and HAAS annual av-
erage <0 030 mg/L.



TTHM annual average <0 040
mg/L and HAAS annual av-
erage <0 030 mg/L



TTHM annual average £0 040
mg/L and HAAS annual av-
erage <0 030 mg/L for two
consecutive years OR
TTHM annual average
<0 020 mg/L and HAAS an-
nual average <0 015 mg/L
for one year
To this level
One sample per treatment plant per quarter at distribution
system location reflecting maximum residence time.



One sample per treatment plant per year at distribution sys-
tem location reflecting maximum residence time during
month of warmest water temperature NOTE Any Subpart
H system serving fewer than 500 persons may not reduce
its monitoring to less than one sample per treatment plant
per year
One sample per treatment plant per year at distribution sys-
tem location reflecting maximum residence time during
month of warmest water temperature



One sample per treatment plant per three year monitoring
cycle at distribution system location reflecting maximum
residence time during month of warmest water tempera-
ture, with the three-year cycle beginning on January 1 fol-
lowing quarter in which system qualifies for reduced moni-
toring


  (iii) Systems that do not meet these
levels must resume monitoring  at  the
frequency   identified   in   paragraph
(b)(l)(i) of this section (minimum mon-
itoring frequency column) in the quar-
ter immediately  following-  the  moni-
toring period  in  which the system  ex-
ceeds  0.060  mg/L  or  0.045  mg/L  for
TTHM or HAA5  respectively. For sys-
tems  using-  only  ground  water  not
under the direct influence  of surface
water and serving fewer than 10,000 per-
sons, if either the TTHM annual aver-
age is >0.080 mg/L or the HAA5 annual
average is  >0.060  mg/L,  the  system
must go to the  increased monitoring
identified  in paragraph (b)(l)(i) of this
section  (sample  location  column)  in
the quarter immediately following the
monitoring- period in which the system
exceeds 0.080  mg/L  or  0.060  mg/L for
TTHMs or HAAS respectively.
  (iv) Systems on increased monitoring
may return to routine monitoring  if,
after at least one year of monitoring-
their TTHM  annual average is <0.060
                                       497

-------
§U1.132
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
mg/L and their HAAS annual average is
<0.045 mg/L.
  (v) The State may return a system to
routine monitoring at the State's dis-
cretion.
  (2) Chlorite. Community and  nontran-
sient  noncommunity  water  systems
using chlorine dioxide, for disinfection
or oxidation, must conduct monitoring
for chlorite.
  (i) Routine monitoring. (A) Daily moni-
toring.  Systems  must take  daily sam-
ples at the entrance to the distribution
system. For any daily sample that ex-
ceeds  the  chlorite MCL,  the system
must take additional samples  in  the
distribution system the following day
at the  locations required by paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this  section,  in addition to
the sample required at the entrance to
the distribution  system.
  (B) Monthly monitoring. Systems must
take a three-sample set each month in
the distribution system. The system
must take one  sample  at each of  the
following locations: near the first cus-
tomer, at a location representative of
average residence time, and at a loca-
tion  reflecting   maximum  residence
time in the distribution system. Any
additional  routine  sampling  must  be
conducted  in the  same manner  (as
three-sample sets, at the specified loca-
tions).  The system may use the results
of  additional  monitoring  conducted
under  paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of  this sec-
tion to meet the requirement for moni-
toring  in this paragraph.
  (ii) Additional monitoring. On each day
following a routine sample monitoring
result that exceeds the chlorite MCL at
the entrance to the  distribution sys-
tem, the  system is required to take
three chlorite distribution system sam-
ples at the following locations: as close
to the first customer as possible, in a
location representative of average resi-
dence time, and as close to the end of
the distribution system as possible (re-
flecting  maximum residence  time  in
the distribution  system).
  (iii) Reduced monitoring. (A) Chlorite
monitoring at the entrance to the dis-
tribution system required by paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(A) of this section may not be
reduced.
  (B) Chlorite monitoring in the dis-
tribution system required by paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(B)  of this section may be re-
duced to one three-sample set per quar-
ter after one year of monitoring where
no individual chlorite sample  taken in
the  distribution system  under  para-
graph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this section has ex-
ceeded the chlorite MCL  and the sys-
tem  has not  been required to conduct
monitoring under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of
this  section.  The system may remain
on the reduced monitoring  schedule
until either any of the three individual
chlorite samples taken quarterly in the
distribution  system under paragraph
(b)(2)(i)(B) of this section exceeds  the
chlorite MCL or the system is required
to conduct monitoring under paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this  section, at which time
the  system  must  revert to  routine
monitoring.
  (3)  Brornate—(i)  Routine monitoring.
Community   and  nontransient  non-
community  systems using  ozone,  for
disinfection  or  oxidation, must take
one sample per  month for each treat-
ment plant in the system using ozone.
Systems must  take samples  monthly
at the entrance to the distribution sys-
tem  while the ozonation system is op-
erating under normal conditions.
  (ii) Reduced monitoring. Systems re-
quired to analyze for bromate may re-
duce monitoring from monthly to once
per  quarter,   if  the  system  dem-
onstrates  that  the  average  source
water  bromide  concentration is less
than 0.05 mg/L based upon representa-
tive  monthly bromide  measurements
for one year. The system may remain
on reduced bromate monitoring until
the  running  annual average  source
water  bromide   concentration,  com-
puted quarterly, is equal  to or greater
than 0.05 mg/L based upon representa-
tive  monthly  measurements. If  the
running annual  average source water
bromide concentration  is >0.05 mg/L,
the system must resume routine moni-
toring required by paragraph (b)(3)(i) of
this section.
  (c)  Monitoring requirements for  dis-
infectant  residuals—(1)   Chlorine   and
chloramines—(i)   Routine   monitoring.
Community  and  nontransient  non-
community  water  systems  that  use
chlorine or chloramines must measure
the residual  disinfectant level  in  the
distribution system at the same point
in the distribution system and at  the
                                     498

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.132
same time as total coliforms are sam-
pled, as specified in §141.21. Subpart H
systems may use the results of residual
disinfectant   concentration   sampling
conducted  under  §141.74(b)(6)(i)  for
unfiltered systems or § 141.74(c)(3)(i) for
systems which filter, in lieu of taking1
separate samples.
  (ii) Reduced monitoring. Monitoring
may not be reduced.
  (2) Chlorine  dioxide—(i) Routine moni-
toring. Community,  nontransient non-
community, and transient noncommu-
nity water systems that use chlorine
dioxide for disinfection  or  oxidation
must take  daily  samples at  the en-
trance to the  distribution system. For
any daily sample  that  exceeds  the
MRDL, the system must take samples
in  the distribution  system  the fol-
lowing day at the locations required by
paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of this section,  in
addition to the sample required at the
entrance to the distribution system.
  (ii) Additional monitoring. On each day
following  a routine sample monitoring
result that exceeds the MRDL, the sys-
tem is required to take three chlorine
dioxide distribution system samples. If
chlorine   dioxide or  chloramines  are
used to maintain a disinfectant resid-
ual in the distribution system, or if
chlorine  is  used to  maintain  a dis-
infectant  residual in the  distribution
system and there are  no  disinfection
addition  points after the  entrance  to
the distribution system (i.e., no boost-
er chlorination), the system must take
three samples as close to the first cus-
tomer as  possible,  at intervals of  at
least six hours. If chlorine is used  to
maintain  a disinfectant residual in the
distribution system and there are one
or  more  disinfection  addition  points
after the  entrance  to  the  distribution
system (i.e., booster chlorination), the
system must take one sample at each
of the following locations: as close  to
the first customer as possible, in a lo-
cation representative of average resi-
dence time,  and as close to the end of
the distribution system as possible (re-
flecting maximum  residence  time  in
the distribution system).
  (iii) Reduced monitoring. Chlorine di-
oxide monitoring may not be reduced.
  (d)  Monitoring  requirements for dis-
infection  byproduct  precursors (DBPP).
(1) Routine monitoring. Subpart  H sys-
tems which use conventional filtration
treatment (as  defined in §141.2) must
monitor each treatment plant for TOG
no later than the point of combined fil-
ter effluent  turbidity monitoring and
representative of the treated water. All
systems required to  monitor under this
paragraph (d)(l) must also monitor for
TOO in the source water prior  to any
treatment at the same time as moni-
toring for TOC in the treated  water.
These samples (source water and treat-
ed water) are referred to as paired sam-
ples.  At the same time as the  source
water sample  is taken, all systems
must monitor  for  alkalinity  in the
source water prior  to any treatment.
Systems must  take  one paired  sample
and one source water alkalinity  sample
per month per plant at a time rep-
resentative of normal operating condi-
tions and influent water quality.
  (2) Reduced monitoring. Subpart H sys-
tems with  an  average  treated water
TOC of less than 2.0 mg/L for two con-
secutive years,  or less than 1.0 mg/L for
one year,  may  reduce monitoring for
both TOC and alkalinity to one paired
sample and one source water alkalinity
sample  per plant per quarter. The sys-
tem must revert to routine monitoring
in the  month  following the quarter
when the  annual average treated water
TOC >2.0 mg/L.
  (e) Bromide. Systems required to ana-
lyze  for bromate may reduce bromate
monitoring from monthly to once per
quarter,  if the system demonstrates
that the average source water bromide
concentration is  less  than 0.05 mg/L
based  upon representative monthly
measurements  for one year. The sys-
tem must continue bromide monitoring
to remain on reduced bromate moni-
toring.
  (f)  Monitoring plans. Bach system re-
quired to monitor under this subpart
must  develop and implement a moni-
toring plan. The system must maintain
the plan and make it available  for in-
spection by the State and the general
public no later than 30 days following
the  applicable  compliance  dates  in
§141.130(b). All Subpart H systems serv-
ing more than 3300 people must submit
a copy of the monitoring plan  to the
State no later than the date of the first
report  required  under  §141.134.  The
State may also  require the plan to be
                                    499

-------
§141.133
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
submitted by any other system. After
review, the  State may require changes
in any plan elements.  The plan must
include at least the following elements.
  (1) Specific locations  and schedules
for collecting samples for any param-
eters included in this subpart.
  (2) How the system  will  calculate
compliance  with MCLs,  MBDLs,  and
treatment techniques.
  (3) If approved for monitoring as a
consecutive  system, or if providing
water  to  a  consecutive  system,  under
the provisions of §141.29, the  sampling
plan must reflect the entire distribu-
tion system.
[63 PR 69466,  Dec. 16, 1998,  as amended at 66
PR 3776, Jan.  16, 2001]
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 PR 38856, June
29, 2004, §141.132 was amended in paragraph
(a)(5) by removing the reference to "or sub-
part M of this part", effective July 29, 2004.

§ 141.133  Compliance requirements.
  (a)  General requirements.  (1) Where
compliance  is based  on a running an-
nual average of monthly or quarterly
samples or  averages and the system
fails to monitor  for  TTHM, HAAS, or
bromate, this failure to monitor will be
treated as a monitoring violation for
the entire period covered by the annual
average. Where compliance  is based on
a running annual average of monthly
or quarterly samples or averages  and
the system failure to monitor makes it
impossible  to  determine  compliance
with    MRDLs   for   chlorine    and
chloramines, this failure to  monitor
will be treated as a monitoring  viola-
tion for the entire  period  covered by
the annual average.
  (2) All samples  taken  and  analyzed
under  the provisions of this subpart
must be included in determining com-
pliance, even if that number is greater
than the minimum required.
  (3) If, during the first year of  moni-
toring under §141.132,  any individual
quarter's  average will  cause  the run-
ning annual average  of that system to
exceed the  MCL, the system  is out  of
compliance  at the end of that quarter.
  (b) Disinfection byproducts—(I) TTHMs
and HAAS, (i) For systems  monitoring
quarterly,  compliance  with  MCLs in
§141.64 must be based on a running an-
nual  arithmetic  average,   computed
quarterly,  of   quarterly  arithmetic
averages of all samples collected by the
system as prescribed by §141.132(b)(l).
  (ii)  For systems monitoring less fre-
quently than quarterly, systems  dem-
onstrate MCL compliance if the aver-
age of samples taken that year  under
the provisions of §141.132(b)(l) does not
exceed the MCLs in §141.64. If the aver-
age of these samples  exceeds the MCL,
the system must increase  monitoring
to  once  per  quarter  per treatment
plant and such a system is not in viola-
tion of the MCL until it has completed
one year  of quarterly monitoring, un-
less the result of fewer  than four quar-
ters of monitoring will cause the run-
ning  annual average  to exceed  the
MCL, in which  case  the  system  is in
violation  at the end of  that quarter.
Systems  required  to increase  moni-
toring frequency to quarterly  moni-
toring must calculate  compliance  by
including the  sample which triggered
the increased monitoring plus the fol-
lowing three quarters of monitoring.
  (iii) If the running annual arithmetic
average of quarterly averages covering
any consecutive four-quarter period ex-
ceeds the MCL, the system is in viola-
tion of the MCL and must notify the
public pursuant  to §141.32  or §141.202,
whichever is effective for your system,
in addition to  reporting  to the  State
pursuant to §141.134.
  (iv) If a PWS fails to complete four
consecutive quarters of monitoring,
compliance with the  MCL for the last
four-quarter  compliance  period must
be based on an average of the available
data.
  (2)  Bromate.   Compliance must  be
based on  a running annual arithmetic
average,   computed   quarterly,   of
monthly  samples (or,  for months in
which the system takes more than one
sample, the average f all samples taken
during the month) collected by the sys-
tem as prescribed by §141.132(b)(3). If
the average of  samples  covering  any
consecutive  four-quarter  period  ex-
ceeds the MCL, the system is in viola-
tion of the MCL and must notify the
public pursuant to subpart Q, in  addi-
tion to reporting to the State pursuant
to §141.134. If a PWS fails to complete
12  consecutive   months'  monitoring,
compliance with the  MCL for the last
four-quarter  compliance  period must
                                     500

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.133
be based on an average of the available
data.
  (3)  Chlorite.  Compliance   must  be
based on an arithmetic average of each
three sample set taken in the distribu-
tion   system   as   prescribed   by
§141.132(b)(2)(i)(B) and §141.132(b)(2)(ii).
If the arithmetic average of any three
sample  set  exceeds the MCL,  the sys-
tem is  in violation  of the  MCL and
must notify the public pursuant to sub-
part Q,  in addition to reporting to the
State pursuant to §141.134.
  (c) Disinfectant residuals—(1) Chlorine
and chloramines. (i) Compliance must be
based on  a  running annual arithmetic
average,   computed   quarterly,   of
monthly  averages  of  all samples col-
lected     by   the    system    under
§141.132(c)(l).  If  the  average covering
any consecutive four-quarter period ex-
ceeds the MRDL, the system is in vio-
lation  of the MRDL and must notify
the public pursuant to subpart Q,  in ad-
dition to  reporting to the State pursu-
ant to §141.134.
  (ii) In cases where systems  switch be-
tween   the   use  of  chlorine  and
chloramines for residual  disinfection
during the  year, compliance must  be
determined  by  including together  all
monitoring results of both chlorine and
chloramines in calculating compliance.
Reports submitted pursuant  to §141.134
must clearly indicate which  residual
disinfectant  was analyzed   for   each
sample.
  (2) Chlorine dioxide, (i)  Acute  viola-
tions. Compliance  must be  based  on
consecutive daily samples collected  by
the system  under §141.132(c)(2). If any
daily sample taken at the entrance to
the  distribution system exceeds  the
MRDL,  and on  the following day one
(or more) of the three samples taken in
the  distribution  system  exceed  the
MRDL,  the system is in violation  of
the MRDL  and must  take  immediate
corrective action to lower the level of
chlorine dioxide  below the MRDL and
must notify the public pursuant to the
procedures  for  acute  health risks  in
subpart Q in  addition to reporting  to
the State pursuant to §141.134. Failure
to take samples in the distribution sys-
tem the day following an exceedance of
the chlorine dioxide MRDL at the en-
trance to the distribution  system will
also be  considered an  MRDL violation
and the system must notify the public
of the violation in accordance with the
provisions for  acute violations  under
subpart Q in addition to reporting to
the State pursuant to §141.134.
  (ii)  Nonacute violations.  Compliance
must  be  based on  consecutive daily
samples collected  by the system under
§141.132(c)(2). If any two  consecutive
daily  samples taken at the entrance to
the  distribution  system  exceed  the
MRDL  and  all   distribution  system
samples  taken are  below  the MRDL,
the system is in violation of the MRDL
and  must take corrective  action  to
lower  the level   of chlorine  dioxide
below the MRDL at the point of sam-
pling  and will notify the public pursu-
ant to  the  procedures  for nonacute
health risks in  subpart Q in addition to
reporting to  the  State  pursuant  to
§141.134. Failure to monitor at the en-
trance to the distribution  system the
day  following  an  exceedance  of  the
chlorine dioxide MRDL at the entrance
to the distribution  system is  also  an
MRDL violation and the system must
notify the public of the violation in ac-
cordance   with  the  provisions  for
nonacute violations  under §141.32(e)(78)
in addition to  reporting to the State
pursuant to §141.134.
  (d)  Disinfection  byproduct precursors
(DBPP).  Compliance must  be deter-
mined as  specified by §141.135(c). Sys-
tems  may begin monitoring to deter-
mine whether Step 1 TOG removals can
be met 12 months  prior to the compli-
ance date for the system.  This moni-
toring is  not required  and  failure  to
monitor during this period is not a vio-
lation. However, any system that does
not monitor during this  period, and
then determines in the first 12 months
after the compliance date that it is not
able to meet the Step 1 requirements in
§141.135(b)(2) and must therefore apply
for alternate minimum  TOO removal
(Step  2)  requirements,  is not  eligible
for retroactive approval  of alternate
minimum TOC removal  (Step 2)  re-
quirements  as  allowed pursuant  to
§141.135(b)(3)  and is  in violation.  Sys-
tems  may apply  for alternate min-
imum TOC removal  (Step  2) require-
ments any time after the compliance
date.  For  systems  required  to meet
Step 1 TOC removals, if the value cal-
culated  under  §141.135(c)(l)(iv)  is less
                                     501

-------
§141.134
             40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
than 1.00, the system is in violation  of
the treatment technique requirements
and must notify the public pursuant to
§141.32, in addition to  reporting to the
State pursuant to §141.134.

[63 FR  69466, Dec. 16,  1998, as amended at 65
FR 26022,  May 4,  2000; 65 FR 40521, June 30,
2000; 66 FR 3777, Jan. 16, 2001]

  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38856, June
29, 2004,  §141.133  was  amended  by revising
paragraph  (a)(3), effective July 29, 2004. For
the convenience of the user, the revised text
is set forth as follows:

§ 141.133   Compliance requirements.
  (a) * * *
  (3) If, during  the first year of monitoring
under §141.132, any individual quarter's aver-
age will cause the running annual  average of
that system to  exceed  the MCL  for  total
trihalomethanes,  haloacetic acids (five),  or
bromate; or the MRDL for chlorine or chlor-
 amine,  the system is out  of  compliance at
 the end of that quarter.
 § 141.134  Reporting and recordkeeping
     requirements.
   (a) Systems required to sample quar-
 terly  or more  frequently  must report
 to the State  within 10 days  after  the
 end  of each quarter in which samples
 were  collected,  notwithstanding   the
 provisions of §141.31. Systems required
 to sample  less  frequently than quar-
 terly  must report  to the State within
 10 days  after  the  end of  each  moni-
 toring period  in  which samples  were
 collected.
   (b)  Disinfection  byproducts.   Systems
 must  report the information specified
 in the following table:
                 If you are a *
(1) System monitoring for TTHMs and HAAS under the require-
  ments of § 141 132(b) on a quarterly or more frequent basis
(2) System monitoring for TTHMs and HAAS under the require-
  ments of §141 132(b) less frequently than quarterly (but as
  least annually).
(3) System monitoring for TTHMs and HAAS  under the
  requnements of §141 132(b) less frequently than annually
(4) System monitoring for chlorite under the requirements of
  §141 132(b)
(5) System monitoring for bromate under the requirements of
  §141 132(b)
                                                               You must report *
(i) The number of samples taken during the last quarter
(n) The location, date, and result of each sample taken during
  the last quarter
(in) The arithmetic average  of all samples taken in the last
  quarter
(iv) The annual arithmetic average of the quarterly arithmetic
  averages of this section for the last four quarters
(v) Whether, based on § 141  133(b)(1), the MCL was violated
(i) The number of samples taken during the last year
(n) The location, date, and result of each sample taken during
  the last monitoring period
(in) The arithmetic average of all samples taken over the last
  year
(iv) Whether, based on § 141 133(b)(1), the MCL was violated
(i) The location, date, and result of each sample taken
(n) Whether, based on §141  133(b)(1), the MCL was violated
(i) The number of entry point samples taken each month for
  the last 3 months
(n) The location, date, and result of each sample (both entry
  point and distribution system) taken during the last quarter
(iii) For each month in the reporting period, the arithmetic aver-
  age of all samples taken in each three samples set taken in
  the distribution system.
(iv) Whether, based on §141 133(b)(3), the MCL was violated,
  in which month, and how many times it was violated each
  month
(i)The number of samples taken during the last quarter
(n)The location, date, and result of each sample taken during
  the last quarter
(in) The arithmetic average of the monthly arithmetic averages-
  of all samples taken in the last year
(iv) Whether, based on § 141 133(b)(2), the MCL was violated
  1 The State may choose to perform calculations and determine whether the MCL was exceeded, in lieu oi having the system
report that information
  (c) Disinfectants. Systems must report
the information  specified  in  the  fol-
lowing table:
                                              502

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                         §141.134
                    If you are a * * *
                                                                          You must report *
(1) System monitoring for chlorine or chlorammes under the re-
  quirements of §141 132(c)
(2) System monitoring for chlorine  dioxide under the require-
   ments of §141 132(c)
(i) The number of samples taken during each month of the last
  quarter
(n) The month arithmetic average of all samples taken in each
  month for the last 12 months
(in) The arithmetic average of the monthly averages for the last
  12 months
(iv) Whether, based on §141 133(c)(1), the MRD was violated
(i) The dates, result, and locations of samples taken during the
  last quarter
(n) Whether, based on §141 133(c)(2), the MRDL was violated
(in) Whether the MRDL was exceeded in any two consecutive
  daily samples and whether the resulting violation was acuate
  or nonacute
  1 The State may choose to perform calculations and determine whether the MRDL was exceeded, in lieu of having the system
report that information
   (d)  Disinfection   byproduct  precursors
and  enhanced  coagulation  or  enhanced
softening.  Systems must report the  in-
 formation  specified  in  the  following
 table:
                      If you are a
                                                                           You must report
(1) System monitoring monthly or quarterly for TOC under the
  requirements of §141.132(d) and required to meet the en-
  hanced  coagulation or enhanced softening requirements  in
  §141 135(b)(2)or(3)
(2) System monitoring monthly or quarterly for TOC under the
  requirements of §141 132(d) and  meeting one or more of
  the alternative compliance criteria in §141  135(a)(2) or (3)
(i) The number of  paired (source water and treated water)
  samples taken during the last quarter.
(ii) The location, date, and results of each paired sample and
  associated alkalinity taken during the last quarter
(in) For each month  in the reporting period that paired samples
  were taken, the arithmetic average of the percent reduction
  of TOC for each paired sample and the required TOC per-
  cent removal
(iv) Calculations for  determining compliance with the TOC per-
  cent removal requirements, as provided in §141.135(c)(1)
(v) Whether the system is in compliance with the enhanced co-
  agulation or  enhanced softening  percent removal require-
  ments in § 141 135(b) for the last four quarters
(i) The  alternative  compliance criterion  that the system is
  using

(ii) The number of paired samples taken during the last quar-
  ter
(Hi) The location, date, and result of  each paired sample and
  associated alkalinity taken during the last quarter
(iv) The running annual arithmetic average based on monthly
  averages (or quarterly  samples) of source  water  TOC for
  systems meeting a criterion in §§141 135(a)(2)(i) or (in) or of
  treated water TOC  for systems  meeting the criterion in
  §141 135(a)(2)(n).
(v) The running annual arithmetic average based on monthly
  averages (or quarterly samples) of source water SUVA for
  systems meeting  the criterion  in  §141 135(a)(2)(v) or of
  treated water SUVA for systems  meeting the criterion in
  §141 135(a)(2)(vi)
(vi) The running annual average of source water  alkalinity for
  systems meeting  the criterion in §141.135(a)(2)(m) and of
  treated water alkalinity for  systems meeting the criterion in
  §141135(a)(3)(.)
(vn) The running annual average for both TTHM and HAAS for
  systems meeting the criterion in § 141 135(a)(2)(m) or (iv)
(vni) The running annual average of the amount of magnesium
  hardness removal (as CaCOs, in mg/L} for systems meeting
  the criterion in §141 135(a)(3)(n)
(ix) Whether the system is in compliance with the particular al-
  ternative compliance criterion in §141 135(a)(2) or (3)
  1 The State may choose to perform calculations and determine whether the treatment technique was met, in lieu of having the
system report that information

[63 FR 69466, Dec. 16, 1998, as amended at 66  PR 3778, Jan. 16, 2001; 66 FR 9903,  Feb.  12, 2001]
                                                     503
        203-160   D-17

-------
§141.135
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 141.135 Treatment technique for con-
    trol of disinfection byproduct (DBF)
    precursors.
  (a) Applicability. (1) Subpart  H sys-
tems   using  conventional  filtration
treatment  (as defined in §141.2 ) must
operate with enhanced coagulation or
enhanced softening to achieve the TOC
percent  removal  levels  specified  in
paragraph (b) of this section unless the
system meets  at least one of the alter-
native  compliance  criteria listed  in
paragraph  (a)(2) or  (a)(3)  of  this sec-
tion.
  (2) Alternative compliance criteria for
enhanced coagulation and enhanced soft-
ening systems.  Subpart H systems using
conventional filtration treatment may
use the alternative compliance criteria
in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)  through (vi) of
this section to  comply with  this sec-
tion in lieu of complying  with para-
graph (b) of this section. Systems must
still comply with monitoring require-
ments in §141.132(d).
  (i) The system's source  water  TOC
level,    measured    according    to
§141.131(d)(3), is less than 2.0 mg/L, cal-
culated quarterly  as  a  running annual
average.
  (ii) The system's treated water TOC
level,    measured    according    to
§141.131(d)(3), is less  than 2.0 mg/L, cal-
culated quarterly  as  a  running annual
average.
  (iii)  The system's  source water TOC
level,    measured    according    to
§141.131(d)(3), is less than 4.0 mg/L, cal-
culated quarterly  as  a  running annual
average; the source  water alkalinity,
measured according  to  §141.131(d)(l), is
greater than 60 mg/L (as CaCO3), cal-
culated quarterly  as  a  running annual
average; and  either the  TTHM  and
HAA5  running annual averages are no
greater than 0.040  mg/L and 0.030 mg/L,
respectively; or prior to the effective
date for compliance  in §141.130(b), the
system has made a clear and irrev-
ocable financial commitment not  later
than the effective date for  compliance
in  §141.130(b)  to  use  of technologies
that will limit the levels of TTHMs and
HAA5  to no more than 0.040 mg/L and
0.030 mg/L, respectively. Systems must
submit evidence of  a clear and irrev-
ocable financial commitment, in  addi-
tion to a  schedule  containing mile-
stones and periodic progress reports for
installation and operation  of  appro-
priate  technologies, to  the  State for
approval not later than the effective
date  for  compliance  in  §141.130(b).
These  technologies must be installed
and operating not later than June 30,
2005. Failure  to install and  operate
these technologies by the date in the
approved  schedule will  constitute  a
violation  of National  Primary  Drink-
ing Water Regulations.
  (iv) The TTHM and HAA5 running an-
nual averages are no greater than 0.040
mg/L and 0.030  mg/L, respectively, and
the system uses only chlorine for pri-
mary disinfection and maintenance of
a residual in the distribution system.
  (v) The system's source water SUVA,
prior to any treatment and measured
monthly according to §141.131(d)(4), is
less  than or equal to 2.0 L/mg-m, cal-
culated quarterly as a running  annual
average.
  (vi)  The system's  finished   water
SUVA, measured monthly according to
§141.131(d)(4), is less than or equal to
2.0 L/mg-m, calculated quarterly as  a
running annual average.
  (3) Additional alternative  compliance
criteria  for softening  systems. Systems
practicing enhanced  softening  that
cannot  achieve  the  TOC removals re-
quired by paragraph (b)(2) of this sec-
tion may use the alternative compli-
ance criteria in  paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and
(ii) of this section in lieu of  complying
with paragraph (b) of this section. Sys-
tems must still comply  with  moni-
toring requirements in §141.132(d).
  (i) Softening that results in lowering
the  treated water alkalinity to less
than  60 mg/L   (as  CaCO3),  measured
monthly according to §141.131(d)(l) and
calculated quarterly  as a running an-
nual average.
  (ii) Softening  that results in  remov-
ing  at  least 10 mg/L  of magnesium
hardness (as CaCO3), measured monthly
and calculated  quarterly as  an  annual
running average.
  (b)  Enhanced  coagulation  and en-
hanced  softening  performance  require-
ments.  (1)  Systems  must achieve the
percent reduction of TOC specified in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section between
the source water and the combined fil-
ter effluent, unless the State approves
                                     504

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.135
a system's  request  for alternate min-
imum TOG removal (Step 2) require-
ments under  paragraph  (b)(3)  of this
section.
  (2) Bequired Step 1 TOG reductions,
indicated in  the  following  table, are
based upon specified source water pa-
 STEP 1 REQUIRED REMOVAL OF TOC BY ENHANCED COAGULATION AND ENHANCED SOFTENING FOR
                SUBPART H SYSTEMS USING CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT '2
rameters measured in accordance with.
§141.131(d).  Systems  practicing  soft-
ening are required to meet the Step 1
TOC reductions in the far-right column
(Source water alkalinity >120 mg/L) for
the specified source water TOC:
Source-water
TOC, mg/L
>20-40 .... 	 	
>40-80 	 	
>80. 	 	
Source-water alkalinity, mg/L as CaCO 3
(in precentages)
0-60
350
45.0
50.0
>60-120
250
35.0
400
>1201
150
250
300
  1 Systems meeting at least one of the conditions in paragraph (a)(2)(i)-(vi) of this section are not required to operate with en-
hanced coagulation
  2 Softening system meeting one of the alternative compliance criteria in paragraph (a)(3) of this section are not required to op-
erate with enhanced softening
  3 System practicing softening must meet the TOC removal requirements in this column
  (3) Subpart H conventional treatment
systems that cannot achieve the Step 1
TOC removals required by  paragraph
(b)(2) of this section due to water qual-
ity  parameters  or  operational con-
straints must apply to the State, with-
in three months of failure to achieve
the  TOC  removals required  by  para-
graph (b)(2) of this section, for approval
of alternative minimum TOC (Step 2)
removal  requirements  submitted  by
the system. If the State approves the
alternative minimum   TOC   removal
(Step 2) requirements,  the State may
make  those requirements retroactive
for the purposes of determining compli-
ance. Until the  State approves the al-
ternate minimum TOC  removal  (Step
2) requirements, the system must meet
the Step 1 TOC removals contained  in
paragraph (t>)(2) of this section.
  (4) Alternate minimum  TOC removal
(Step 2) requirements. Applications made
to the State by enhanced coagulation
systems for approval of alternate min-
imum  TOC removal  (Step 2) require-
ments  under  paragraph (b)(3) of this
section must  include, at a minimum,
results  of bench- or pilot-scale testing
conducted under paragraph (b)(4)(i)  of
this  section. The submitted bench-  or
pilot-scale testing must be used to de-
termine the alternate enhanced coagu-
lation level.
  (i) Alternate enhanced coagulation level
is defined as coagulation at a coagulant
dose and  pH as  determined by the
method   described   in   paragraphs
(b)(4)(i) through (v) of this section such
that an incremental addition of 10 mg/
L of alum (or equivalent amount of fer-
ric salt) results in a TOC removal of <
0.3 mg/L. The percent removal  of TOC
at this point  on  the "TOC removal
versus coagulant dose"  curve is  then
defined as  the  minimum TOC removal
required for the system. Once approved
by the State,  this minimum require-
ment supersedes the minimum TOC re-
moval required by the  table in para-
graph  (b)(2) of this  section. This re-
quirement  will be effective until  such
time as the State approves a new value
based  on the  results of a new  bench-
and pilot-scale test. Failure to achieve
State-set  alternative minimum  TOC
removal levels  is a  violation  of Na-
tional Primary Drinking Water Regu-
lations.
  (ii) Bench- or pilot-scale  testing of
enhanced  coagulation  must be  con-
ducted by  using representative water
samples and adding 10 mg/L increments
of alum (or equivalent amounts of fer-
ric salt) until  the pH is reduced to a
level less than or equal to the enhanced
coagulation Step 2  target pH shown in
the following table:

 ENHANCED COAGULATION STEP 2 TARGET PH
      Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCOJ
0-60
>60-120
>120-240
Target pH
     55
     S.3
     7.0
                                     505

-------
§141.135
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
ENHANCED COAGULATION STEP 2 TARGET pH—
              Continued
Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO3)
>240 	 	
Target pH
7.5
  (ill) For  waters with alkalinities of
less than 60 mg/L for which addition of
small amounts of alum or equivalent
addition of iron  coagulant drives  the
pH below 5.5 before significant TOO re-
moval  occurs,  the  system must add
necessary chemicals to maintain  the
pH between 5.3 and 5.7 in samples until
the TOG removal of 0.3 mg/L per 10 mgr/
L alum added (or equivalant addition
of iron coagulant) is reached.
  (iv) The system may operate at any
coagulant dose or  pH necessary (con-
sistent with other NPDWRs) to achieve
the minimum TOO percent removal ap-
proved under paragraph (b)(3) of this
section.
  (v) If the TOG removal is consistently
less than 0.3 mg/L of TOG per 10 mg/L
of incremental alum dose at all dosages
of alum (or equivalant addition of iron
coagulant), the water is deemed to con-
tain TOG not amenable to enhanced co-
agulation. The system may then apply
to the State for  a  waiver of enhanced
coagulation requirements.
  (c) Compliance  calculations.  (1) Sub-
part H systems other than those identi-
fied in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this
section must  comply with  require-
ments  contained  in paragraph (b)(2) or
(b)(3) of this section. Systems must cal-
culate compliance quarterly, beginning
after   the   system  has  collected  12
months of data, by determining  an an-
nual average using  the following meth-
od:
  (i)  Determine  actual monthly TOO
percent removal,  equal to:

  (1—(treated water TOC/source water
             TOO) x 100

  (ii) Determine  the required monthly
TOG percent removal (from either  the
table in paragraph (b)(2) of this section
or from paragraph  (b)(3) of this sec-
tion).
  (iii)  Divide  the value in paragraph
(c)(l)(i) of this section by the value in
paragraph (c)(l)(ii) of this section.
  (iv) Add together the results of para-
graph (c)(l)(iii) of this section for  the
last 12 months and divide by 12.
  (v) If the value calculated in para-
graph (c)(l)(iv) of this  section  is less
than 1.00, the system is not in compli-
ance with the TOG percent removal re-
quirements.
  (2) Systems may use the provisions in
paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through (v)  of this
section  in lieu of the calculations in
paragraph  (c)(l)(i) through (v) of this
section  to determine compliance with
TOG percent removal requirements.
  (i) In any month  that  the system's
treated  or  source  water TOG  level,
measured according to §141.131(d)(3), is
less than 2.0 mg/L, the system may as-
sign a monthly value of 1.0 (in  lieu of
the  value  calculated  in   paragraph
(c)(l)(iii) of this  section) when calcu-
lating compliance under the provisions
of paragraph (c)(l) of this section.
  (ii) In any month that a system prac-
ticing softening removes at least 10 mg/
L of magnesium  hardness (as CaCO3),
the  system  may  assign  a  monthly
value of 1.0 (in lieu  of the value cal-
culated in paragraph (c)(l)(iii) of this
section)  when calculating compliance
under the provisions of paragraph (c)(l)
of this section.
  (iii) In any month that the system's
source water SUVA, prior to any treat-
ment  and measured  according   to
§141.131(d)(4), is <2.0 L/mg-m, the sys-
tem may assign a monthly value of 1.0
(in lieu of the value calculated in para-
graph (c)(l)(iii) of  this section) when
calculating compliance under the pro-
visions  of paragraph (c)(l) of this sec-
tion.
  (iv) In any month that the system's
finished water SUVA, measured accord-
ing to §141.131(d)(4), is <2.0 L/mg-m,  the
system  may assign a monthly value of
1.0 (in lieu of the value calculated in
paragraph (c)(l)(iii)  of this section)
when calculating  compliance under the
provisions of paragraph (c)(l) of this
section.
  (v) In any month that a system prac-
ticing enhanced softening lowers alka-
linity below 60  mg/L (as  CaCO;i),  the
system  may assign a monthly value of
1.0 (in lieu of the value calculated in
paragraph (c)(l)(iii)  of this section)
when calculating  compliance under the
                                    506

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.152
provisions  of paragraph (c)(l) of this
section.
  (3) Subpart H systems using conven-
tional treatment may also comply with
the  requirements of this section by
meeting the criteria in paragraph (a)(2)
or (3) of this section.
  (d)  Treatment technique  requirements
for DBF precursors. The  Administrator
identifies the  following as treatment
techniques to control the level of dis-
infection   byproduct   precursors  in
drinking water treatment and distribu-
tion systems: For Subpart H  systems
using  conventional  treatment,   en-
hanced coagulation  or  enhanced  soft-
ening.
[63 FB 69466, Dec. 16, 1998,  as amended at 66
PR 3779, Jan. 16, 2001]

     Subparts M-N [Reserved]

      Subpart O—Consumer
        Confidence Reports

  SOURCE: 63 FR 44526, Aug. 19, 1998, unless
otherwise noted.

§141.151  Purpose and applicability of
    this subpart.
  (a) This subpart establishes the  min-
imum requirements  for the content of
annual reports that community water
systems  must  deliver   to  their  cus-
tomers. These reports must contain in-
formation on the quality of the water
delivered by the systems and charac-
terize the risks (if any)  from exposure
to contaminants detected in the drink-
ing water  in an accurate and under-
standable manner.
  (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of
§141.3, this  subpart applies   only  to
community water systems.
  (c) For the purpose of this  subpart,
customers are defined as  billing units or
service connections  to which water is
delivered by a community water sys-
tem.
  (d)  For the purpose of this  subpart,
detected means: at or above the levels
prescribed by §141.23(a)(4) for inorganic
contaminants,  at  or above the levels
prescribed by §141.24(f)(7) for the con-
taminants  listed  in §141.61(a), at  or
above   the    level   prescribed   by
§141.24(h)(18) for the  contaminants list-
ed in §141.61(c), and at or above the lev-
els  prescribed by  §141.25(c) for radio-
active contaminants.
  (e) A State that has primary enforce-
ment responsibility may adopt by rule,
after notice and comment, alternative
requirements for the form and content
of the reports. The alternative require-
ments must provide the same type and
amount of information as required by
§§141.153 and 141.154, and must  be  de-
signed to achieve an equivalent level of
public information and education  as
would be achieved under this subpart.
  (f) For purpose of §§141.154 and 141.155
of this subpart,  the  term  "primacy
agency" refers  to  the  State or tribal
government entity that  has  jurisdic-
tion over, and primary enforcement re-
sponsibility for, public water systems,
even if that government does not have
interim or final primary enforcement
responsibility for this  rule.  Where the
State or tribe  does not  have primary
enforcement  responsibility  for  public
water systems,  the  term  "primacy
agency" refers to the appropriate EPA
regional office.

§ 141.152 Effective dates.
  (a)  The regulations  in this subpart
shall take effect on September 18, 1998.
  (b)  Each existing community water
system must deliver its first report by
October 19,  1999,  its second report by
July 1, 2000, and subsequent reports by
July  1  annually  thereafter.  The first
report must contain data collected dur-
ing,  or prior to, calendar year 1998  as
prescribed in §141.153(d)(3). Each report
thereafter must contain  data collected
during,  or prior to, the previous cal-
endar year.
  (c) A  new community  water system
must deliver its first report by July 1
of the year after its first full calendar
year in operation  and annually there-
after.
  (d) A  community water system that
sells  water  to  another  community
water system must deliver the applica-
ble  information required in §141.153  to
the buyer system:
  (1) No later than  April 19, 1999, by
April 1, 2000, and  by April 1 annually
thereafter or
  (2) On a date mutually agreed upon
by the  seller and the purchaser, and
specifically included in a contract  be-
tween the parties.
                                    507

-------
§141.153
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 141.153  Content of the reports.
  (a)  Each, community water  system
must provide  to its customers an an-
nual report that contains the informa-
tion  specified in  this  section  and
§141.154.
  (b) Information on the source of the
water delivered:
  (1)  Each report  must  identify the
source(s) of the water delivered by the
community water system by providing
information on:
  (i) The type of the water: e.g., surface
water, ground water; and
  (ii) The commonly used name (if any)
and location of the body (or bodies)  of
water.
  (2) If a source water assessment has
been completed, the report must notify
consumers  of  the  availability  of this
information and the means to obtain
it. In addition, systems are encouraged
to highlight in the report  significant
sources of contamination in the source
water area if  they  have readily avail-
able information. Where a system has
received  a source  water assessment
from  the primacy  agency,  the report
must include  a brief summary of the
system's susceptibility  to  potential
sources of  contamination,  using lan-
guage provided by the  primacy agency
or written by the operator.
  (c) Definitions. (1) Each report  must
include the following definitions:
  (i) Maximum  Contaminant  Level Goal
or MCLG: The level  of a contaminant in
drinking water below which  there is no
known  or  expected  risk  to  health.
MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.
  (ii) Maximum Contaminant Level  or
MCL: The highest level of a contami-
nant that is allowed in drinking water.
MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs  as
feasible using  the best available treat-
ment technology.
  (2) A report for a community water
system operating under a variance  or
an exemption issued under § 1415 or 1416
of SDWA  must include  the following
definition:  Variances  and Exemptions:
State or EPA permission not to  meet
an  MCL  or   a treatment   technique
under certain conditions.
  (3) A report that contains data on
contaminants   that  EPA   regulates
using any of the following terms must
include the applicable definitions:
  (i) Treatment Technique:  A  required
process intended to reduce the level of
a contaminant in drinking water.
  (ii) Action Level: The concentration of
a contaminant which, if exceeded, trig-
gers treatment or other requirements
which a water system must follow.
  (iii)  Maximum  residual  disinfectant
level goal or  MRDLG:  The  level of a
drinking  water   disinfectant  below
which  there is no known or  expected
risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect
the benefits of the use of disinfectants
to control microbial contaminants.
  (iv)  Maximum  residual  disinfectant
level or MRDL: The highest level of a
disinfectant allowed in drinking water.
There is convincing evidence that addi-
tion of a disinfectant is necessary  for
control of microbial contaminants.
  (d) Information on detected contami-
nants.
  (1) This sub-section specifies the  re-
quirements for information to  be  in-
cluded in each report for contaminants
subject to mandatory monitoring  (ex-
cept Cryptosporidium). It applies to:
  (i) Contaminants subject to a MCL,
action level, maximum residual  dis-
infectant level, or treatment technique
(regulated contaminants).
  (ii)  Contaminants  for which  moni-
toring  is required by §141.40  (unregu-
lated contaminants); and
  (iii) Disinfection by-products or mi-
crobial  contaminants for which moni-
toring   is  required  by  §§141.142  and
141.143, except as provided under para-
graph (e)(l) of this section, and which
are detected in the finished water.
  (2) The data relating  to these con-
taminants  must  be  displayed in  one
table or in several adjacent tables. Any
additional monitoring results which a
community  water system chooses to
include in its report  must be displayed
separately.
  (3) The data must be derived from
data collected to comply with EPA and
State  monitoring and  analytical  re-
quirements during calendar year  1998
for the first report and subsequent cal-
endar years thereafter except that:
  (i) Where a system is allowed to mon-
itor for regulated  contaminants  less
often than once  a year, the table(s)
must  include the  date  and results  of
                                    508

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.153
the most recent sampling and the re-
port must include a brief statement in-
dicating that the data presented in the
report are from the most recent testing
done  in accordance with the regula-
tions. No data older than 5 years need
be included.
  (ii)  Results of monitoring in compli-
ance  with §§141.142 and  141.143 need
only be included for 5 years from the
date of  last sample or until any of the
detected contaminants  becomes  regu-
lated and subject to  routine  moni-
toring requirements,  whichever comes
first.
  (4) For detected regulated contami-
nants (listed in appendix A to this sub-
part), the table(s) must contain:
  (i) The MCL for that contaminant ex-
pressed  as a number equal to or greater
than 1.0 (as provided in appendix A  to
this subpart);
  (ii)  The MCLG for that  contaminant
expressed in the  same  units as the
MCL;
  (iii) If there is no MCL for a detected
contaminant, the  table must indicate
that there is a treatment  technique,  or
specify  the action level,  applicable  to
that contaminant, and the report must
include  the definitions for treatment
technique and/or action level, as appro-
priate,  specified in paragraph(c)(3)  of
this section;
  (iv) For contaminants subject to an
MCL, except turbidity and total coli-
forms, the highest contaminant level
used to  determine compliance with an
NPDWR and the range of  detected lev-
els, as follows:
  (A)  When compliance with the MCL
is determined  annually  or less  fre-
quently: The highest detected level  at
any sampling point  and  the range  of
detected levels expressed  in the  same
units as the MCL.
  (B) When compliance with the MCL is
determined by calculating  a running
annual average of all samples taken  at
a sampling point:  the highest average
of any of the sampling  points and the
range of all sampling points expressed
in the same units as the MCL.
  (C) When compliance with the MCL is
determined on a system-wide basis by
calculating a running annual average
of all samples at all  sampling points:
the average and range of  detection ex-
pressed  in the same units as the MCL.
  NOTE TO PARAGRAPH (d)(4)(iv): When round-
ing of results to determine compliance with.
the MCL is allowed by  the  regulations,
rounding should be done prior to multiplying
the results by the factor listed in appendix A
of this subpart.
  (v) For turbidity.
  (A) When it is reported pursuant to
§141.13:  The highest average  monthly
value.
  (B) When it is reported pursuant to
the requirements of §141.71: the highest
monthly value.  The report  should in-
clude an explanation of the reasons for
measuring turbidity.
  (C)  When it is reported pursuant to
§141.73 or §141.173 or §141.551: the high-
est single measurement and the lowest
monthly percentage of samples meet-
ing the  turbidity limits specified in
§141.73 or §141.173, or  §141.551 for the
filtration technology being used. The
report should include an explanation of
the reasons for measuring turbidity;
  (vi) For lead and copper: the 90th per-
centile value of the most recent round
of sampling and the  number of sam-
pling sites exceeding the action level;
  (vii) For total coliform:
  (A) The highest monthly  number of
positive samples for systems collecting
fewer than  40 samples per month; or
  (B)  The highest monthly percentage
of positive  samples for systems col-
lecting at least 40 samples per month;
  (viii) For fecal  coliform:  The  total
number of positive samples; and
  (ix) The  likely source(s) of detected
contaminants to the best of the opera-
tor's  knowledge. Specific information
regarding contaminants may be avail-
able  in  sanitary  surveys  and source
water assessments, and should be used
when available  to the  operator. If the
operator lacks specific information on
the likely  source, the  report must in-
clude  one   or  more   of  the  typical
sources for that contaminant  listed in
appendix A to this subpart that is most
applicable to the system.
  (5) If a community water system dis-
tributes  water  to its customers from
multiple   hydraulically  independent
distribution systems that are fed by
different raw water sources, the  table
should contain  a separate column for
each service area and the report should
identify each separate distribution sys-
tem.  Alternatively,   systems   could
                                    509

-------
§141.153
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
produce separate reports tailored to in-
clude data for each service area.
  (6) The table(s) must clearly identify
any   data  indicating  violations   of
MCLs,  MBDLs,  or  treatment  tech-
niques,  and the  report must contain a
clear and readily understandable expla-
nation of the violation including: the
length of the violation, the potential
adverse  health  effects,  and  actions
taken by the system to address the vio-
lation. To describe the potential health
effects,  the system  must use the rel-
evant language  of appendix A  to this
subpart.
  (7)  For  detected  unregulated con-
taminants for which monitoring is re-
quired  (except  Cryptosporidium), the
table(s) must contain the average and
range at  which the contaminant was
detected.  The  report  may  include a
brief explanation  of the  reasons  for
monitoring  for  unregulated contami-
nants.
  (e) Information on Cryptosporidium,
radon, and other contaminants:
  (1) If  the  system has performed any
monitoring  for  Cryptosporidium,  in-
cluding monitoring  performed  to sat-
isfy the requirements of § 141.143, which
indicates that Cryptosporidium may be
present in the source water or the fin-
ished water, the  report must include:
  (i) A summary of the results of the
monitoring; and
  (ii) An  explanation of  the  signifi-
cance of the results.
  (2) If  the  system has performed any
monitoring  for  radon which indicates
that radon may be present in the fin-
ished water, the  report must include:
  (i) The results of the monitoring; and
  (ii) An  explanation of  the  signifi-
cance of the results.
  (3) If the system has performed addi-
tional monitoring which indicates the
presence of other contaminants in the
finished water,  EPA strongly  encour-
ages  systems to  report  any  results
which may  indicate a health concern.
To determine if results may indicate a
health concern,  EPA recommends that
systems find out if  EPA has proposed
an NPDWR  or issued a health advisory
for that  contaminant by  calling the
Safe Drinking Water Hotline (800-426-
4791). EPA  considers detects above a
proposed MCL or health advisory level
to indicate possible health concerns.
For  such  contaminants,  EPA  rec-
ommends that the report include:
  (i) The results of the monitoring; and
  (ii)  An explanation of  the  signifi-
cance of the results noting the exist-
ence of a health advisory or a proposed
regulation.
  (f) Compliance with NPDWR. In addi-
tion   to    the   requirements    of
§141.153(d)(6), the report must note any
violation that occurred during the year
covered by the report of a requirement
listed below, and include  a clear and
readily  understandable explanation  of
the violation,  any  potential adverse
health effects, and the steps the system
has taken to correct the violation.
  (1) Monitoring and reporting of com-
pliance data;
  (2) Filtration and  disinfection  pre-
scribed by  subpart H of this part. For
systems  which have  failed to install
adequate   filtration   or   disinfection
equipment  or processes, or have had a
failure of such equipment  or processes
which constitutes a violation, the re-
port must  include  the following lan-
guage as part of the explanation of po-
tential  adverse health  effects:  Inad-
equately treated water  may  contain
disease-causing organisms. These orga-
nisms  include  bacteria,  viruses, and
parasites which  can  cause symptoms
such as nausea, cramps,  diarrhea, and
associated headaches.
  (3) Lead  and copper control require-
ments prescribed by subpart I of this
part. For systems that fail to take one
or   more   actions   prescribed   by
§§141.80(d),  141.81, 141.82, 141.83 or 141.84,
the report  must include the applicable
language of appendix A to  this subpart
for lead, copper, or both.
  (4) Treatment techniques for  Acryl-
amide and Epichlorohydrin prescribed
by subpart K of this part. For systems
that violate  the  requirements of sub-
part K of this part,  the report  must in-
clude the relevant  language from ap-
pendix A to this subpart.
  (5)  Recordkeeping  of  compliance
data.
  (6) Special  monitoring requirements
prescribed by §§ 141.40 and 141.41; and
  (7) Violation of the terms of a vari-
ance, an exemption, or an administra-
tive or judicial order.
  (g) Variances  and Exemptions.  If a
system is operating under the  terms of
                                    510

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.153
a  variance  or  an  exemption  issued
under §1415 or 1416 of SDWA, the report
must contain:
  (1) An explanation of the reasons for
the variance  or exemption;
  (2) The date on which the variance or
exemption was issued;
  (3) A brief  status report on the steps
the system is taking-  to  install treat-
ment, find alternative  sources of water,
or  otherwise comply  with the terms
and schedules  of the  variance  or ex-
emption; and
  (4) A  notice  of any opportunity for
public input  in the review, or renewal,
of the variance or exemption.
  (h) Additional information:
  (1) The  report must contain a brief
explanation  regarding  contaminants
which may reasonably be expected to
be  found  in  drinking  water including
bottled  water. This explanation  may
include  the  language of  paragraphs
(h)(l) (i) through (iii)  or  systems  may
use  their  own  comparable language.
The report also must  include the lan-
guage  of  paragraph  (h)(l)(iv)  of  this
section.
  (i) The  sources  of  drinking water
(both tap water and bottled water) in-
clude rivers,  lakes, streams, ponds, res-
ervoirs, springs, and  wells. As water
travels  over  the surface of the land or
through the  ground, it dissolves natu-
rally-occurring minerals  and, in some
cases,  radioactive  material,  and can
pick up substances resulting from the
presence of animals or from human ac-
tivity.
  (ii)   Contaminants  that  may   be
present  in source water include:
  (A) Microbial contaminants, such as vi-
ruses and  bacteria, which may  come
from sewage  treatment plants, septic
systems, agricultural  livestock  oper-
ations, and wildlife.
  (B)  Inorganic  contaminants,  such  as
salts and  metals, which  can be natu-
rally-occurring  or  result  from urban
stormwater  runoff,  industrial or  do-
mestic wastewater  discharges, oil and
gas production, mining, or farming.
  (C)  Pesticides  and herbicides,  which
may come from a  variety of sources
such as agriculture, urban stormwater
runoff, and residential  uses.
  (D) Organic chemical contaminants, in-
cluding  synthetic and  volatile organic
chemicals, which are by-products of in-
dustrial  processes and petroleum pro-
duction,  and can also come from  gas
stations, urban stormwater runoff,  and
septic systems.
  (E) Radioactive contaminants, which
can be naturally-occurring or be the re-
sult of oil and gas production and min-
ing activities.
  (iii) In order to ensure that tap water
is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regula-
tions which limit the amount  of cer-
tain contaminants  in water  provided
by public water systems. FDA regula-
tions establish limits for contaminants
in bottled water which  must  provide
the same protection for public health.
  (iv) Drinking  water,  including bot-
tled water, may reasonably be expected
to contain at least  small amounts of
some contaminants.  The  presence of
contaminants does not necessarily in-
dicate that water poses  a health risk.
More information about  contaminants
and  potential health effects can be ob-
tained by  calling the Environmental
Protection  Agency's  Safe  Drinking
Water Hotline (800-426-4791).
  (2) The report  must include the tele-
phone number of the owner, operator,
or designee of the  community water
system as a source of additional infor-
mation concerning the report.
  (3) In communities with a large pro-
portion of non-English speaking resi-
dents,  as determined by the Primacy
Agency, the report must  contain infor-
mation  in  the appropriate language(s)
regarding the importance of the report
or contain a telephone number or ad-
dress where such residents may contact
the system to obtain a translated copy
of the report  or assistance in  the  ap-
propriate language.
  (4) The report  must include informa-
tion (e.g., time and  place  of regularly
scheduled board meetings) about  op-
portunities for public participation in
decisions that may affect the quality of
the water.
  (5) The systems may include such ad-
ditional information as they deem nec-
essary for public education consistent
with, and not detracting  from, the pur-
pose of the report.

[63 FR 44526, Aug. 19, 1998, as amended at 63
PR 69516, Dec. 16, 1998;  64 FR 34733, June 29,
1999; 65 FR 26022, May 4, 2000; 67 FR 1836, Jan.
14, 2002]
                                    511

-------
§141.154
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§141.154 Required  additional  health
   information.
  (a) All reports must prominently dis-
play the following language: Some peo-
ple may be  more  vulnerable to  con-
taminants  in drinking water than the
general   population.    Immuno-com-
promised persons such as persons with
cancer undergoing  chemotherapy, per-
sons who have  undergone organ trans-
plants, people with HIV/AIDS or other
immune system disorders, some elder-
ly, and infants can be particularly  at
risk   from  infections.   These  people
should  seek  advice about  drinking
water from their health care providers.
EPA/CDC   guidelines  on  appropriate
means to lessen the risk of infection by
Cryptosporidium  and other  microbial
contaminants are  available from the
Safe Drinking  Water Hotline (800-126-
4791).
  (b) Ending in the report due by July
1, 2001, a system which detects arsenic
at levels above 0.025 mg/L, but below
the 0.05 mg/L, and beginning in the re-
port due by July 1, 2002,  a system that
detects arsenic above 0.005 mg/L and up
to and including 0.010 mg/L:
  (1) Must include in its  report a short
informational statement about arsenic,
using  language such  as:  While your
drinking water meets EPA's  standard
for arsenic, it does contain low levels
of arsenic. EPA's standard balances the
current understanding of arsenic's pos-
sible health effects against the costs of
removing arsenic from drinking water.
EPA continues to research the  health
effects of low levels of arsenic, which is
a mineral known to cause cancer in hu-
mans  at high concentrations and  is
linked to  other health effects such  as
skin damage and circulatory problems.
  (2)  May  write  its own educational
statement, but only  in consultation
with the Primacy Agency.
  (c) A system which detects nitrate at
levels above 5 mg/1, but below the MCL:
  (1)  Must  include a short  informa-
tional statement about the impacts of
nitrate on children  using language
such as: Nitrate in drinking water  at
levels above 10  ppm is a health risk for
infants of less than six months of age.
High nitrate levels in drinking water
can cause blue  baby syndrome. Nitrate
levels may rise quickly  for short peri-
ods of time because of rainfall or agri-
cultural activity. If you are caring for
an infant you should ask advice from
your health care provider.
  (2) May  write  its  own  educational
statement, but  only in  consultation
with the Primacy Agency.
  (d) Systems which detect lead above
the action level in more than 5%, and
up to and including 10%, of homes sam-
pled:
  (1) Must include  a short informa-
tional statement about  the special im-
pact of lead on children using language
such as: Infants and young children are
typically  more vulnerable to  lead  in
drinking water than the general popu-
lation. It is possible that lead levels at
your home may be higher than at other
homes in the community as a result of
materials used in your home's plumb-
ing.  If you are concerned about ele-
vated lead levels in your home's water,
you may wish to have your water test-
ed and flush your tap for 30 seconds to
2 minutes before using tap water. Addi-
tional  information is  available from
the Safe Drinking Water  Hotline (800-
426-4791).
  (2) May  write  its  own  educational
statement, but  only in  consultation
with the Primacy Agency.
  (e) Community  water systems that
detect TTHM  above 0.080 mg/1,  but
below the MCL in §141.12, as an annual
average,   monitored  and  calculated
under the  provisions of §141.30.  must
include  health  effects  language  for
TTHMs prescribed by appendix A.
  (f) Beginning  in the  report  due  by
July 1, 2002,  and ending January  22,
2006, a community water system that
detects arsenic above 0.010 mg/L and up
to and  including  0.05 mg/L  must  in-
clude the  arsenic health  effects  lan-
guage  prescribed  by Appendix A  to
Subpart O of this part.

[63 FR 44526, Aug. 19, 1998,  as amended at 63
FR 69475, Dec.  16, 1998; 64 FR 34733, June 29,
1999; 65 FR 26023, May 4, 2000; 66 FR 7064, Jan.
22, 2001; 68 FR 14506, Mar. 25, 2003]

§141.155   Report delivery and record-
   keeping.
  (a) Except  as provided  in paragraph
(g) of this section,  each community
water system must mail or  otherwise
directly deliver one copy of the report
to each customer.
                                    512

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.155
  (b)  The system must make a good
faith  effort to reach consumers who do
not get water  bills, using- means rec-
ommended by  the primacy  agency.
EPA  expects  that an  adequate good
faith  effort will be tailored to the con-
sumers who are served by the system
but are not bill-paying customers, such
as renters or workers. A good faith ef-
fort to reach consumers would include
a mix of methods appropriate  to  the
particular system such as: Posting the
reports on  the Internet; mailing  to
postal patrons in metropolitan areas;
advertising the availability of the re-
port in the news media; publication in
a local newspaper; posting  in public
places such  as  cafeterias  or  lunch
rooms of public buildings; delivery of
multiple copies for distribution by sin-
gle-biller customers such  as apartment
buildings  or  large private employers;
delivery to community organizations.
  (c) No later than the date the system
is required to distribute  the report to
its  customers,  each community water
system must mail a copy of the report
to the primacy agency, followed within
3 months by a certification that the re-
port has been distributed to customers,
and that the information is correct and
consistent with the compliance moni-
toring data  previously  submitted  to
the primacy agency.
  (d) No later than the date the system
is required to distribute  the report to
its  customers,  each community water
system must deliver the report to any
other  agency  or clearinghouse  identi-
fied by the primacy agency.
  (e)  Each community water system
must  make its reports available to the
public upon request.
  (f) Each community water system
serving 100,000 or more persons must
post Its current year's report to a pub-
licly-accessible site on the Internet.
  (g) The Governor of a State or his
designee,  or  the  Tribal Leader where
the tribe has  met the eligibility re-
quirements contained in §142.72 for the
purposes  of  waiving the mailing re-
quirement, can waive  the requirement
of paragraph (a)  of this  section for
community   water  systems   serving
fewer than 10,000 persons. In consulta-
tion with the  tribal government,  the
Regional Administrator may waive the
requirement  of §141.155(a)  in  areas in
Indian country where no tribe has been
deemed eligible.
  (1) Such systems must:
  (i) Publish the reports in one or more
local  newspapers  serving the  area in
which the system is located;
  (ii) Inform the customers that the re-
ports will not be mailed, either in the
newspapers in which  the  reports  are
published or  by other means approved
by the State;  and
  (iii)  Make  the reports  available  to
the public upon request.
  (2) Systems serving 500 or fewer per-
sons may forego  the  requirements of
paragraphs (g)(l)(i) and (ii) of this sec-
tion if they provide notice at least once
per year to their customers by mail,
door-to-door  delivery or by posting in
an appropriate location that the report
is available upon request.
  (h) Any system  subject to this sub-
part must retain  copies of  its Con-
sumer Confidence Report  for  no less
than 3 years.
[63 FR 44526, Aug. 19, 1998, as amended at 65
FR 26023, May 4, 2000]
                                    513

-------
Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
                                 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                  «
               3> c c

               ?£ E

                ~
         eHZJiiii
         M Q..O a  O w S g


         !f!:p|!t
         o5c5ES'o*^
         ^^o^TacaCf-c^
         •gcEuiiaEoiS
    o
II
I1
                                         I
PH
O


EH
 g
 CQ

          3 J

          Al
         O •
        ! CD

        ; E
                               514

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
                       !*'!
                       if-'
                        : o *^

                        !Iv
              I •£ ^ | ° i

               re y  QJ i

              SS8*Ii
"""I:
                           i 2 ° c  i
                           I 05 _*: (fj "D i

                           !S.g|i1
                                                    ^1
                                515

                                                         ^ a
                                                         £ E
I
i
                               I
                               •a

                               2
           o

           §
           »
           2
II-
&!«

§i 8
5 - »

.!•§
S1:.-!
                              t
                         ll

-------
Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Some people
containing
the MCL
could ex
or probl
culatory
an incre
cancer
                _ 2
      i
     UJ
                                               !8
                                               .&
 Illl
 ligl?
 5 UJ Q DC (5
                                                      Q
                                                      DC
                                                      5
                                                      Q
                                                      rr
                                                      -E
                                                      O
                                  516

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                   PI. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
s
8
                                                 i'S
                                                 5 c
                                                 ) 2
D
OC
O
OC
O
cr
a
cc
8
<
             a
             cc
1
o
£
O
             1
             2
o
S
2
S
                                  517

-------
Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
                         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    & x £•£ S  S "5 £ -6 ?>
    i:IIf  I|||B


           fflfllJ
    **,***  ti:?*S!
           !iiP  lli!I*ilt<
                                        a i « 5 „ ^ i
                                        ™ Q £ .,,.5 „ >.
               •£  2c^
               '&  s^lU
                          s s «g sa  s !
                          .S*fj««,  ^
                                       >-^
                                    B -
                            ! E* =
    •i;
}. 0)_l „ «
L|8»S
         . s g £ a
         : c 5 ^ - 2
              tl  l?l!HUie  «hl.*«-
              °-  «ET-««5'§PS   Sffi  o>
                        !§.
                           5 » 3 § o.ai
B§?aia^aii'i=s5!fri
«||.»g»gg,g|||Sg>»g.?|ifff8§g|SSl2
S.-D£="~"-E-°*E'0-S=s-E<0"01JS*°®E"*So5a.
  o, S £ "
 gl^S S^
!S = 13SS
  08-
If
1 =
          llli
                             2
                             •
                                ETJ  Si
                                i 2 S  -1
                                    ® to *s
                                    N S g
                                    ~i y a
                                         «;..
                                         5fl
                           518

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                         Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
.a i S = « « i  P?E!
"8£f5»&  §S 2
B .- 'S § >.«_  'Sm —
                     oScni
S18!"  «"  ||g>2'"!8g|€c|J
iiJiisi  !il£§i!!Uii



^         W         05




                                     11 III
                                        to
 Si,3ii
 ^ t  •? (
 S O -c, S (
 S « I «3
 •g3 II !
 = J2  S ,
 •O g g,g

 s^^^i

  *"!
 •fij= S  I

 a i a) 8
? «il«
5 E o I .1
-$
a
ti
th
 o

Jil
?tf
»?"
 ra o
^Is
          E -g »
              l

                                       a
                                       CL
                                              I
                             519

-------
Pt. Ul.Subpt. O, App. A
                   40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 .2.
                                           l
                               c
                               ~ J
                               S
                               fc
                      11s Si.



               88>*.2(n-J: i 8 o> S.T3 .c •-§ § 8 "5 8 :!
 £  j8 £
IS  g-g^
             I
                      s j

                      •B1

Pi 5Ht»t
, -5 .j -S o 5 S «-o « a :
ifflllltpi.


i        w

                            520

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                    Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
           I
           11
                                      2
                                      •e
                                 |5|

                                 5 .,2

                                 ill


                                 III
                                 SEE
                                 gi|
                                 o  g>

                                 W T3 rt
                                 S3 c ^

                                 E *° °
                                 UJ
                               8      8
                                            a
                                            Q
                                            o
 l
SL.J
6
f ^
CVJ Q-


Q
                                 521

-------
Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)


                                                           iio-gUi
                                                           CO .- " '=

                                                           fill
                                                           Q. C 0) O
     €fl



     Icli
               1
               •2

               £
                          S


                          I
                                                     Sa
                                                     ;i
                                                     ^•o"
                                                     S Ss
                                                     Q
                                  522

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
         S §>
        13
1-:-
*§ S .S
° » To
3 3 "-

                             !!
                                           I
£ a>
A (U
                             II
                                523

-------
Pt. Ul.Subpt. O, App. A
        40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
ater
ex-
any
rob-
w
in
eys
water
                                             1
                                  EfeSM^los*^
                                  •Dgoio-feoa,11'^
                                   ®_i £ £ 0-g£2 5
                                  £oOa|oi!g£
                                  SS^o  S 6  Oj.
                                   £   
-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                      Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
Sg|:

i£s


IP


i?!:
 T-" O
S
Q- 0> {g


^s S
   S

  il

  !|
    N O 1

    A'S!
 0) CVJ

 if

 * I
          8 Bi
          g S *
          s:i
          s§£
          =s e e
JS|E*

!Kii
0) tft
>,E

>,»
C ^3
CO O
E Q.
;!t
  s
             0)  g

             J-o -
  dii  «r.j
 isSSsI?*:
 Ss5$g *^!-s;
       9-5>S
  « O

i  ?•
j. o>£ _i


 isi
 5 a  _    	
jc-SajBg o c •= — S g mcSS-ora
:O==^O^ CO=-^O^ pOXtUCn-
:OT3£o£ kOT3Oo£ tO(l)>.CDO
          5 =
         •o « 8 .2
 ^ s.  Q. o)>^ "5 ^  Q. o) y3

0^ill»8!HH
^£SrnSS2|S..Bx
                     '5
i   » A &£ i

1   1-1^


Llis|»
^ O  fl) 	I Q- Q)
1) S ? *~ ^-3 (D T^
>8|ss>lE
CO v > >,  CO Jt C

:.i-^s,t
jg g-g- 3 « &
t rail's 8 = &
2 °  S » !2 -_ °
nj^ (UccAm^JS
S.S E88S.I3
          1

          I
          1
                                          I

              !i
              O
                      f
                      Q
                             525
                             5.
                             e
                             o
                                     •S
                                     I

-------
Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Health effects language
&
CO
S
I
c
c
•0
E
W
 "3
oE
o<£
£<->
0
c
d

„
~
•3
2
t-



t

•g
g
g
S
8
Some people who drink water
containing tetrachloroethylene
in excess of the MCL over
t
•o
c
«
c


•*2
2
a) 2
0> ,

0
1
CD
t-
many years could have prob-
lems with their liver, and may
have an increased risk of get-
ting cancer
Some people who drink water
containing 1,2,4-
trichlorobenzene well in excess
D)
1
|
At
•g



2
B g
£?§

Q




g






S





°





&



N
C
O
£
o
o
1^
•7 •£
c\r ^-
of the MCL over many years
could experience changes in
their adrenal glands.
Some people who drink water
containing 1,1,1 -tnchloroethane
in excess of the MCL over
many years could experience
problems with their liver, nerv-
ous system, or circulatory sys-
tem
o>
c
«
(0
£
g>»
— o
S B
oj a
Et
11
*~ TJ
O> (0

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                     Pt. 141,Subpt. O, App. A
a
s
I
     o
     JZ
     O




     I
I
 ll^l! B.U.-


 '1,11
•".i'SSl-S^^^u,,-
       Iti
                             I
                             •o
                             a
                     527

-------
§141.170
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Subpart   P—Enhanced   Filtration
     and     Disinfection—Systems
     Sen/ing  10,000  or More Peo-
     ple

  SOURCE: 63 FR 69516, Deo. 16, 1998, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 141.170  General requirements.
  (a) The requirements of this subpart
P constitute national primary drinking
water  regulations.  These  regulations
establish requirements  for filtration
and  disinfection that are in addition to
criteria under which filtration and dis-
infection are required under subpart H
of this part.  The  requirements of this
subpart  are  applicable  to   subpart H
systems  serving at least 10,000 people,
beginning January 1, 2002 unless other-
wise specified in this subpart. The reg-
ulations in this subpart establish or ex-
tend treatment technique requirements
in lieu of maximum contaminant levels
for the following contaminants: Giardia
lamblia,  viruses,  heterotrophic  plate
count       bacteria,        Legionella,
Cryptosporidium,  and  turbidity.  Each
subpart H system serving at least 10,000
people must provide treatment of its
source water that complies with these
treatment technique requirements and
are  in addition to those identified in
§141.70. The  treatment  technique  re-
quirements consist  of  installing  and
properly  operating  water  treatment
processes which reliably achieve:
  (1) At least 99 percent  (2-log) removal
of  Cryptosporidium  between  a point
where  the raw water is  not subject to
recontamination by surface water run-
off and a point downstream  before or at
the first customer for filtered systems,
or Cryptosporidiwn  control  under  the
watershed control plan for unfiltered
systems.
  (2) Compliance with  the profiling and
benchmark  requirements  under   the
provisions of §141.172.
  (b) A public water system subject to
the requirements of this subpart is con-
sidered to be in compliance  with the re-
quirements of paragraph (a) of this sec-
tion if:
  (1) It   meets  the  requirements  for
avoiding   filtration  in  §§141.71  and
141.171  and  the  disinfection  require-
ments in §§141.72 and 141.172; or
  (2) It meets the applicable filtration
requirements   in  either   §141.73  or
§141.173 and the disinfection  require-
ments in §§141.72 and 141.172.
  (c)  Systems are  not permitted to
begin construction  of uncovered  fin-
ished water storage facilities beginning
February 16,1999.
  (d)  Subpart H  systems that did not
conduct  optional  monitoring  under
§141.172 because they served fewer than
10,000 persons when such  monitoring
was  required, but  serve   more  than
10,000 persons prior to January 14, 2005
must comply  with §§141.170, 141.171,
141.173, 141.174, and  141.175. These  sys-
tems must also consult with the State
to establish a disinfection benchmark.
A system that decides to  make  a sig-
nificant  change  to  its  disinfection
practice, as described in §141.172(c)(l)(i)
through  (iv)  must  consult with the
State prior to making such change.

[63 FR 69516,  Dec. 16, 1998, as amended at 66
FR 3779, Jan. 16, 2001; 67 FR 1836, Jan. 14,
2002]
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69  FR 38856, June
29, 2004, §141.170 was amended in paragraph
(d) by removing the date "January 14,  2005"
and adding in its place "January 1, 2005", ef-
fective July 29, 2004.

§141.171   Criteria for avoiding  filtra-
   tion.

  In  addition to the  requirements  of
§141.71, a public water system subject
to the  requirements  of this subpart
that  does not provide  filtration  must
meet all  of  the conditions  of para-
graphs (a) and (b) of this section.
  (a) Site-specific conditions. In addition
to site-specific conditions  in §141.71(b),
systems must maintain the watershed
control program under §141.71(b)(2) to
minimize the potential for contamina-
tion by Cryptosporidium oocysts in the
source water. The  watershed control
program must, for Cryptosporidium:
  (1) Identify watershed characteristics
and  activities which may have an ad-
verse effect on source water quality;
and
  (2) Monitor the occurrence of activi-
ties  which may have an adverse effect
on source water quality.
  (b) During the onsite inspection con-
ducted   under  the   provisions   of
§141.71(b)(3), the State must determine
                                     528

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.172
whether the  watershed  control  pro-
gram established under §141.71(b)(2) is
adequate to limit potential contamina-
tion by Cryptosporidium  oocysts.  The
adequacy of the program must be based
on the comprehensiveness of the water-
shed review; the  effectiveness  of  the
system's program  to monitor and  con-
trol detrimental activities occurring in
the watershed;  and the extent to which
the water system  has maximized  land
ownership  and/or  controlled land  use
within the watershed.

§141.172 Disinfection   profiling  and
    benchmarking.
  (a) Determination of systems required to
profile.  A public water system subject
to  the  requirements of  this  subpart
must determine its TTHM annual aver-
age using the  procedure  in paragraph
(a)(l) of this section and  its  HAAS an-
nual average  using  the  procedure  in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The an-
nual average is the arithmetic average
of the  quarterly averages of four  con-
secutive quarters of monitoring.
  (1) The TTHM annual average must
be the  annual average during the same
period  as is used for the  HAAS  annual
average.
  (i) Those systems that collected data
under the provisions of subpart M (In-
formation  Collection Rule)  must  use
the results of the samples  collected
during  the  last four  quarters of re-
quired  monitoring under §  141.142.
  (ii) Those systems that use "grand-
fathered" HAAS occurrence data  that
meet  the   provisions  of  paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of this section must use TTHM
data collected at the same time under
the provisions of §§141.12 and 141.30.
  (iii) Those systems that  use HAAS oc-
currence data that meet the provisions
of paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of this  sec-
tion must use TTHM data collected at
the same time  under the  provisions of
§§141.12 and 141.30.
  (2) The HAAS annual average must be
the annual average during the same pe-
riod as is used for the TTHM  annual
average.
  (i) Those systems that collected data
under the provisions of subpart M (In-
formation  Collection Rule) must  use
the results of the samples  collected
during  the  last four  quarters  of re-
quired monitoring under §141.142.
  (ii) Those  systems  that have col-
lected four quarters of HAAS  occur-
rence data that meets the routine mon-
itoring sample number and location re-
quirements for TTHM in §§141.12 and
141.30  and  handling  and  analytical
method requirements  of §141.142(b)(l)
may  use  those   data   to  determine
whether  the requirements  of  this sec-
tion apply.
  (iii) Those systems that have not col-
lected four quarters of HAAS  occur-
rence data that meets the provisions of
either paragraph  (a)(2)(i) or (ii)  of this
section by March  16, 1999 must either:
  (A) Conduct  monitoring  for HAAS
that  meets  the   routine  monitoring
sample number and location require-
ments for TTHM in §§141.12 and 141.30
and handling and  analytical method re-
quirements of  §141.142(b)(l)  to  deter-
mine the  HAAS  annual average and
whether the requirements of paragraph
(b)  of this section apply.  This moni-
toring must be completed so  that the
applicability  determination  can   be
made no later than March 31, 2000, or
  (B) Comply with all other provisions
of this section as if the HAAS moni-
toring had been conducted and the re-
sults required  compliance with para-
graph (b) of this section.
  (3) The system  may request that the
State approve  a  more  representative
annual data set than the data set de-
termined under paragraph (a)(l) or  (2)
of this section for the purpose of deter-
mining  applicability of the  require-
ments of this section.
  (4) The State  may require that a sys-
tem  use a more representative annual
data set  than the data set determined
under paragraph (a)(l) or (2) of this sec-
tion for the purpose of determining ap-
plicability of the requirements of this
section.
  (5) The system  must submit data  to
the  State  on  the schedule in  para-
graphs (a)(5)(i)  through  (v) of  this sec-
tion.
  (i)  Those  systems  that  collected
TTHM and HAAS  data under the provi-
sions of subpart M (Information Collec-
tion Rule), as required by paragraphs
(a)(l)(i)  and  (a)(2)(i)  of this  section,
must submit the results of the samples
collected during the last 12 months  of
required monitoring under §141.142 not
later than December 31,1999.
                                    529

-------
§141.172
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (ii)  Those  systems  that  have col-
lected four  consecutive  quarters  of
HAA5 occurrence data that  meets the
routine monitoring sample number and
location for TTHM in §§141.12 and 141.30
and handling and analytical method re-
quirements of §141.142(b)(l), as allowed
by paragraphs (a)(l)(ii) and (a)(2)(ii) of
this section, must submit those data to
the State not later than April 16, 1999.
Until the State has approved the data,
the system must conduct monitoring
for HAAS using the monitoring require-
ments   specified  under   paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) of this section.
  (iii)  Those  systems  that  conduct
monitoring for HAAS using  the moni-
toring requirements specified by para-
graphs  (a)(l)(iii) and (a)(2)(iii)(A)  of
this  section, must  submit TTHM and
HAAS  data not later  than  March 31,
2000.
  (iv) Those systems that elect to com-
ply with  all other provisions of this
section as if the HAAS monitoring had
been  conducted  and  the results re-
quired compliance with this section, as
allowed under paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(B)
of this section, must notify the State
in writing of their election not later
than December 31, 1999.
  (v)  If the system elects to request
that  the  State approve  a  more rep-
resentative annual data  set than the
data  set  determined under  paragraph
(a)(2)(i)  of this  section,  the system
must submit  this  request in writing
not later than December 31, 1999.
  (6) Any system having either a TTHM
annual average >0.064 mg/L or an HAAS
annual average >0.048 mg/L during the
period identified in paragraphs (a)(l)
and  (2) of this section must comply
with paragraph (b) of this section.
  (b) Disinfection  profiling. (1) Any sys-
tem  that meets  the  criteria  in para-
graph (a)(6)  of this section must de-
velop a disinfection profile  of its dis-
infection  practice for a period of up to
three years.
  (2)  The system must  monitor daily
for a period of 12 consecutive  calendar
months to determine the total logs of
inactivation for each day of operation,
based on the CT99.9 values in Tables
1.1-1.6, 2.1, and 3.1  of §141.74(b), as ap-
propriate, through  the  entire  treat-
ment plant.  This system must begin
this monitoring not later than April 1,
2000. As a minimum, the system with a
single point of disinfectant application
prior to entrance to the  distribution
system  must  conduct the monitoring
in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (iv) of
this section. A system with more than
one  point of  disinfectant application
must conduct the monitoring in para-
graphs (b)(2)(i) through (iv) of this sec-
tion for each disinfection segment. The
system  must  monitor the parameters
necessary to determine the total  inac-
tivation ratio, using analytical meth-
ods in §141.74(a), as follows:
  (i) The temperature of the disinfected
water must be measured once per day
at  each  residual  disinfectant  con-
centration sampling point  during peak
hourly flow.
  (ii) If the system  uses chlorine, the
pH of  the disinfected water must  be
measured once per day at each chlorine
residual  disinfectant   concentration
sampling  point  during peak  hourly
flow.
  (iii) The disinfectant  contact time(s)
("T") must be  determined for each day
during peak hourly flow.
  (iv) The residual disinfectant  con-
centration^) ("C") of the water before
or at the first customer and prior to
each additional  point  of  disinfection
must be  measured each  day  during
peak hourly flow.
  (3) In lieu  of  the monitoring con-
ducted  under  the provisions of  para-
graph (b)(2) of this  section to develop
the  disinfection profile,  the system
may elect to meet the requirements of
paragraph (b)(3)(i)  of this section.  In
addition to the monitoring  conducted
under the provisions of paragraph (b)(2)
of this section to develop the disinfec-
tion profile, the system may  elect to
meet the  requirements of  paragraph
(b)(3)(ii) of this section.
  (i) A PWS that has three years of ex-
isting  operational  data  may  submit
those data, a profile generated  using
those  data,  and  a request  that the
State approve use of those data in lieu
of monitoring under the provisions of
paragraph (b)(2) of  this  section not
later than March 31, 2000. The  State
must determine whether  these  oper-
ational data are substantially equiva-
lent to data collected under the provi-
sions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
These data must also be representative
                                     530

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.172
of Giardia lamblia inactivation through
the entire treatment plant and not just
of certain treatment  segments. Until
the  State  approves this request, the
system is  required to conduct  moni-
toring under  the provisions of para-
graph (b)(2) of this section.
  (ii) In addition to  the disinfection
profile   generated  under   paragraph
(b)(2) of this section,  a  PWS that has
existing operational  data  may  use
those  data to develop  a disinfection
profile for additional  years. Such sys-
tems may  use these additional yearly
disinfection  profiles  to  develop  a
benchmark under  the  provisions  of
paragraph (c) of this section. The State
must determine  whether these oper-
ational data are  substantially equiva-
lent to data collected  under the provi-
sions of paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
These data must also be  representative
of  inactivation  through  the   entire
treatment plant and not just of certain
treatment segments.
  (4) The system must  calculate the
total inactivation ratio as follows:
  (i) If the system uses only one point
of disinfectant application, the system
may determine the total inactivation
ratio  for  the  disinfection  segment
based on either of the methods in para-
graph  (b)(4)(i)(A)  or (b)(4)(i)(B)  of this
section.
  (A) Determine one inactivation ratio
(CTcalc/CT99.9)  before  or at  the first
customer during peak hourly flow.
  (B)  Determine   successive  CTcalc/
CTggg  values,  representing sequential
inactivation ratios, between the point
of disinfectant application and a point
before or at the first  customer during
peak hourly  flow. Under  this  alter-
native,  the system must calculate the
total inactivation ratio by determining
 CTcalc/CT99 9)  for  each  sequence  and
 •,hen adding the  (CTcalc/CT99 9) values
 together  to  determine  (E  (CTcalc/
 3T999)).
  (ii) If the system uses more than one
 joint of disinfectant application before
 ;he first customer, the system must de-
 ;ermine the CT value  of each disinfec-
 ;ion segment immediately prior to the
 lext point of  disinfectant application,
 >r for  the  final segment, before or at
 ,he first customer, during peak hourly
 low. The (CTcalc/CT99 9) value of each
 legment and (I(CTcalc/CT99 9)) must be
calculated using the method in para-
graph (b)(4)(i) of this section.
  (iii) The system must determine the
total logs of  inactivation by multi-
plying the value calculated  in para-
graph (b)(4)(i) or (ii) of this section by
3.0.
  (5)  A  system  that  uses  either
chloramines  or ozone for primary  dis-
infection  must also calculate the logs
of  inactivation  for  viruses  using  a
method approved by the State.
  (6) The  system must retain disinfec-
tion profile data in graphic form, as a
spreadsheet,  or in  some  other  format
acceptable to the State for review as
part of sanitary  surveys  conducted by
the State.
  (c) Disinfection  benchmarking. (1) Any
system required  to develop a disinfec-
tion profile  under  the provisions of
paragraphs (a) and (b)  of this section
and that decides  to make a significant
change  to  its  disinfection  practice
must consult with the State prior to
making   such   change.   Significant
changes to disinfection practice are:
  (i) Changes to  the point of disinfec-
tion;
  (ii) Changes to  the disinfectant(s)
used in the treatment plant;
  (iii) Changes  to the disinfection proc-
ess; and
  (iv) Any other modification  identi-
fied by the State.
  (2) Any  system that is modifying its
disinfection practice must calculate its
disinfection benchmark using the pro-
cedure specified in paragraphs (c)(2)(i)
through (ii) of this section.
  (i) For  each year of profiling  data
collected  and  calculated under para-
graph (b) of this section, the system
must determine the  lowest  average
monthly Giardia lamblia inactivation in
each year of profiling data. The system
must determine  the average Giardia
lamblia inactivation for  each calendar
month for each year of profiling data
by dividing the  sum of  daily Giardia
lamblia of inactivation by the number
of values calculated for that month.
  (ii)  The disinfection benchmark is
the lowest monthly average value  (for
systems  with  one  year of  profiling
data) or average of lowest monthly av-
erage values (for systems  with more
than one year of profiling data) of the
                                    531

-------
§141.173
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
monthly logs of Giardia lamblia inac-
tivation in each year of profiling data.
  (3)  A  system  that   uses   either
chloramines  or ozone for  primary dis-
infection must also calculate the dis-
infection benchmark for viruses using
a method approved by the State.
  (4) The system  must submit informa-
tion in paragraphs (c)(4)(i) through (iii)
of this  section to the State as part of
its consultation process.
  (i)  A  description  of the  proposed
change;
  (ii)  The   disinfection  profile  for
Giardia  lamblia (and, if necessary, vi-
ruses) under paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion  and benchmark as  required by
paragraph (c)(2) of this section; and
  (iii) An analysis of how  the proposed
change  will affect the current levels of
disinfection.
[63 FR 69516, Dec. 16, 1998, as  amended at 66
FR 3Y79, Jan. 16, 2001]

§ 141.173 Filtration.
  A public water system subject to the
requirements of this subpart  that does
not meet all of the criteria in this sub-
part  and subpart H of this part for
avoiding filtration must provide treat-
ment consisting of both disinfection, as
specified in  §141.72(b),  and  filtration
treatment which complies with the re-
quirements  of paragraph  (a)  or (b) of
this section or §141.73 (b) or (c)  by De-
cember 31, 2001.
  (a)  Conventional filtration treatment or
direct filtration.  (1) For  systems using
conventional filtration or  direct filtra-
tion, the turbidity level of representaj-
tive  samples of a  system's  filtered
water must be less than or equal to 0.3
NTU in at least 95 percent of  the meas-
urements taken each month,  measured
as specified in §141.74(a) and (c).
  (2) The turbidity level of representa-
tive  samples of a  system's  filtered
water must at no time  exceed 1 NTU,
measured as specified in §141.74(a) and
(c).
  (3) A system that uses lime softening
may  acidify representative  samples
prior to analysis using  a protocol ap-
proved by the State.
  (b) Filtration technologies other  than
conventional  filtration treatment,  direct
filtration, slow sand filtration, or diato-
maceous earth filtration. A public water
system may use a filtration technology
not listed in paragraph (a) of this sec-
tion or in §141.73(b) or (c)  if it dem-
onstrates to  the  State,  using  pilot
plant studies or other means, that the
alternative  filtration  technology,  in
combination with disinfection  treat-
ment that meets the requirements  of
§141.72(b),  consistently  achieves  99.9
percent removal  and/or inactivation of
Giardia lamblia cysts and 99.99 percent
removal and/or inactivation of viruses,
and     99    percent    removal    of
Cryptosporidium oocysts, and the State
approves the use of the filtration tech-
nology. For each approval, the State
will  set turbidity performance require-
ments that the system must  meet  at
least 95 percent  of the time and that
the system may not exceed at any time
at a level that  consistently achieves
99.9  percent removal  and/or inactiva-
tion of Giardia lamblia cysts, 99.99 per-
cent removal and/or inactivation of vi-
ruses,   and  99   percent  removal   of
Cryptosporidium oocysts.

[63 FR 69516, Deo.  16, 1998, as  amended at 65
FR 20313, Apr. 14, 2000; 66 FR 3779, Jan.  16,
2001]

§141.174  Filtration sampling  require-
   ments.
  (a) Monitoring requirements for sys-
tems using filtration treatment. In ad-
dition  to  monitoring  required  by
§141.74, a public  water system  subject
to the requirements  of this subpart
that  provides  conventional filtration
treatment or  direct  filtration  must
conduct continuous monitoring of tur-
bidity for each  individual filter using
an approved method in §141.74(a) and
must calibrate turbidimeters using the
procedure  specified by the  manufac-
turer.  Systems must record the results
of individual filter monitoring every 15
minutes.
  (b) If there is a failure in the contin-
uous turbidity monitoring equipment,
the  system  must conduct  grab sam-
pling every four hours in lieu of contin-
uous monitoring,  but for no more than
five  working days following the failure
of the equipment.

§ 141.175  Reporting and recordkeepin
    requirements.
  In addition to the reporting and rec-
ordkeeping  requirements  in §141.75,  a
                                     532

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.175
public water system subject to the re-
quirements  of  this subpart that pro-
vides conventional filtration treatment
or direct filtration must report month-
ly to the State the information  speci-
fied  in paragraphs  (a) and (b) of this
section beginning January 1, 2002.  In
addition to  the reporting and record-
keeping requirements in §141.75, a pub-
lic water system subject to the require-
ments of this subpart that provides fil-
tration approved under §141.173(b) must
report monthly to the State the  infor-
mation specified in paragraph  (a)  of
this  section beginning January 1, 2002.
The  reporting in paragraph (a) of this
section is in lieu of the reporting  speci-
fied in §141.75(b)(l).
  (a)  Turbidity measurements as re-
quired by §141.173 must  be  reported
within 10 days after the  end of each
month the system serves water to the
public.  Information  that must be re-
ported includes:
  (1) The total number of filtered  water
turbidity measurements taken during
the month.
  (2) The number and percentage  of fil-
tered  water turbidity  measurements
taken during the month which are less
than  or  equal  to the turbidity limits
specified in §141.173(a) or (b).
  (3)  The date  and value  of  any tur-
bidity measurements taken during the
month which exceed 1 NTU for systems
using  conventional filtration   treat-
ment or direct filtration, or which ex-
ceed  the  maximum level set by the
State under  §141.173(b).
  (b)  Systems  must maintain the re-
sults  of individual  filter monitoring
taken under §141.174 for  at least  three
years. Systems must report that they
have  conducted individual filter tur-
bidity monitoring under §141.174 within
10 days after the end of each month the
system serves water to the public. Sys-
tems  must report individual filter tur-
Didity  measurement  results   taken
under §141.174 within 10 days after the
3nd of each month the system serves
tvater to  the public only if measure-
ments demonstrate one or more of the
conditions in paragraphs (b)(l) through
4) of this section. Systems that use
ime softening  may apply to the  State
'or alternative  exceedance levels for
;he levels specified in paragraphs (b)(l)
through (4)  of this section if they can
demonstrate that higher turbidity lev-
els in individual filters are due to lime
carryover only and not due to degraded
filter performance.
  (1) For any individual filter that has
a  measured turbidity level of greater
than 1.0 NTU in two consecutive  meas-
urements taken 15  minutes apart, the
system must report the filter number,
the turbidity measurement,  and the
date(s)  on which  the exceedance  oc-
curred.  In addition, the system must
either produce a filter profile for the
filter within 7 days of the exceedance
(if the system is not able to identify  an
obvious reason for the abnormal filter
performance) and report that the pro-
file has been produced or report the ob-
vious reason for the exceedance.
  (2) For any individual filter that has
a  measured turbidity level of greater
than 0.5 NTU in two consecutive  meas-
urements taken 15  minutes  apart  at
the end of the first  four hours of con-
tinuous filter operation after the filter
has  been  backwashed  or  otherwise
taken offline, the system must report
the filter number,  the turbidity, and
the date(s) on which the exceedance oc-
curred.  In addition, the system must
either produce a filter profile for the
filter within 7 days of the exceedance
(if the system is not able to identify  an
obvious reason for the abnormal filter
performance) and report that the pro-
file has been produced or report the ob-
vious reason for the exceedance.
  (3) For any individual filter that has
a  measured turbidity level of greater
than 1.0 NTU in two consecutive  meas-
urements taken 15  minutes  apart  at
any time in each of three consecutive
months,  the system must report the
filter number,  the  turbidity measure-
ment, and the date(s) on which the ex-
ceedance occurred. In addition, the sys-
tem must conduct a self-assessment of
the filter within 14  days of the exceed-
ance and report that the self-assess-
ment was  conducted.  The self assess-
ment must consist  of at least the fol-
lowing components: assessment  of fil-
ter performance; development of a fil-
ter   profile;   identification    and
prioritization  of factors limiting filter
performance; assessment of the  appli-
cability of corrections; and preparation
of a filter self-assessment report.
                                    533

-------
§141.201
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (4) For any individual filter that has
a measured turbidity level  of  greater
than 2.0 NTU in two consecutive meas-
urements taken 15 minutes apart at
any  time in each  of two consecutive
months,  the system must report the
filter number,  the turbidity measure-
ment, and the date(s) on which the ex-
ceedance occurred.  In addition, the sys-
tem  must arrange for the  conduct of a
comprehensive performance  evaluation
by the State or a third party approved
by the State no later than 30 days fol-
lowing the  exceedance  and  have the
evaluation completed and submitted to
the State no later than  90 days fol-
lowing the exceedance.
  (c) Additional reporting  requirements.
(1) If at any time the turbidity  exceeds
1 NTU in representative samples of fil-
tered water in a system using conven-
tional  filtration treatment  or direct
filtration, the system must inform the
State as soon as possible,  but no later
than the end of the next business day.
  (2) If at any time the  turbidity in
representative   samples  of   filtered
water exceeds  the  maximum level set
by the State under  §141.173(b) for filtra-
tion  technologies  other than conven-
tional  filtration treatment,  direct fil-
tration, slow sand  filtration, or diato-
maceous earth  filtration, the  system
must inform the State as  soon as pos-
sible, but no later  than the  end of the
next business day.
[63 FR 69516, Dec. 16,  1998, as  amended at 66
FR 3779, Jan. 16, 2001]

 Subpart Q—Public Notification of
     Drinking Water Violations

  SOURCE: 65  FR 26035,  May 4,  2000, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 141.201   General  public  notification
   requirements.
  Public water systems  in States with
primacy  for the public water  system
supervision   (PWSS)  program  must
comply with the requirements  in this
subpart no later than May 6, 2002 or on
the  date the  State-adopted rule be-
comes effective, whichever comes first.
Public water  systems in  jurisdictions
where  EPA  directly  implements the
PWSS  program must comply with the
requirements in this subpart on Octo-
ber 31, 2000. Prior to these dates, public
water  systems must continue to  com-
ply  with  the  public notice  require-
ments in §141.32 of this part. The  term
"primacy agency" is used in  this  sub-
part to refer to either EPA or the State
or the Tribe in cases where EPA, the
State, or the Tribe exercises  primary
enforcement responsibility for this sub-
part.
  (a) Who must give public notice?  Each
owner or operator  of a public water
system  (community  water  systems,
non-transient  non-community  water
systems, and transient non-community
water systems) must give notice for all
violations  of  national primary drink-
ing water regulations (NPDWR) and for
other situations, as listed  in  Table 1.
The term "NPDWR violations" is used
in this subpart to include violations of
the   maximum   contaminant   level
(MCL), maximum residual disinfection
level  (MKDL),   treatment  technique
(TT),  monitoring  requirements,  and
testing procedures  in this part 141. Ap-
pendix A to this subpart identifies the
tier assignment for each specific viola-
tion or situation requiring a public no-
tice.
TABLE 1 TO §141.201—VIOLATION CATEGORIES
  AND OTHER SITUATIONS REQUIRING A PUBLIC
  NOTICE

(1) NPDWR violations:
    (i) Failure to comply with an applicable
      maximum contaminant level- (MCL) or
      maximum  residual  disinfectant  level
      (MRDL).
    (ii) Failure to comply with a prescribed
      treatment technique (TT).
    (iii) Failure to perform water quality mon-
      itoring, as required  by the  drinking
      water regulations.
    (iv) Failure to comply with testing proce-
      dures  as  prescribed  by  a  drinking
      water regulation.
(2) Variance and exemptions under sections
  1415 and 1416 of SDWA:
    (i) Operation under a variance or an ex-
      emption.
    (ii) Failure to comply with the require-
      ments of any schedule that has been
      set under a variance or exemption.
(3) Special  public notices:
                                     534

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §141.202
TABLE 1 TO §141.201—VIOLATION CATEGORIES
  AND OTHER SITUATIONS REQUIRING A PUBLIC
  NOTICE—Continued

    (i)  Occurrence of a waterborne disease
      outbreak  or other waterborne  emer-
      gency.
    (ii)  Exceedance  of the nitrate  MCL by
      non-community    water    systems
      (NCWS), where granted permission by
      the primacy agency under 141.11(d) of
      this part.
    (iii)  Exceedance  of the secondary  max-
      imum contaminant  level  (SMCL)  for
      fluoride.
    (iv)  Availability of  unregulated contami-
      nant monitoring data.
    (v) Other violations and situations deter-
      mined by the  primacy  agency  to  re-
      quire a public notice under this sub-
      part, not already  listed in Appendix A.

  (b) What type of  public  notice is re-
quired  for  each violation  or situation?
Public  notice  requirements are divided
into three tiers,  to  take  into  account
the seriousness of the violation or situ-
ation  and  of  any   potential  adverse
health  effects  that  may  be involved.
The  public notice  requirements  for
each violation or situation listed in
Table  1 of this section are  determined
by  the tier to which  it  is assigned.
Table 2 of this section provides the def-
inition of each tier. Appendix A of this
part identifies the tier assignment for
each specific violation or situation.
 TABLE 2 TO §141.201—DEFINITION OF PUBLIC
              NOTICE TIERS

(1) Tier 1 public notice— required for NPDWR
  violations and situations with significant po-
  tential to have serious adverse effects  on
  human health as a result of short-term ex-
  posure.
(2) Tier 2 public notice—required for all other
  NPDWR violations and situations with po-
  tential to have serious adverse effects  on
  human health.
(3) Tier 3 public notice—required for all other
  NPDWR violations and  situations not  in-
  cluded in Tier 1 and Tier 2.

  (c) Who must be notified?
  (1)  Bach  public water system must
provide public notice to persons served
by  the  water system, in  accordance
with this subpart.  Public  water  sys-
tems  that sell or  otherwise provide
drinking water to other  public water
systems (i.e.,  to consecutive systems)
are  required  to give  public notice to
the  owner or  operator of the consecu-
tive system; the consecutive system is
responsible for providing public notice
to the persons it serves.
  (2) If a public water system has a vio-
lation in a portion  of  the distribution
system  that  is physically  or hydrau-
lically isolated from other parts of the
distribution system, the primacy agen-
cy may  allow the system to limit dis-
tribution of the public notice to only
persons  served by that portion of the
system  which is  out  of  compliance.
Permission by the primacy agency for
limiting  distribution  of  the  notice
must be granted in writing.
  (3) A copy of the notice must also be
sent to the primacy agency,  in accord-
ance  with  the requirements  under
§141.31(d).

§141.202  Tier  1 Public Notice—Form,
    manner, and frequency of notice.
  (a) Which violations  or  situations re-
quire a Tier 1  public notice? Table  1 of
this  section  lists  the violation  cat-
egories and other situations requiring
a Tier 1 public notice. Appendix A to
this subpart identifies  the tier assign-
ment for each specific  violation or sit-
uation.
TABLE 1 TO §141.202—VIOLATION CATEGORIES
  AND OTHER SITUATIONS  REQUIRING A TIER 1
  PUBLIC NOTICE

(1) Violation  of the MCL for total  coliforms
  when fecal coliform or E. coli are present
  in the water distribution system (as speci-
  fied in §141.63(b)), or when the water sys-
  tem fails to test for fecal coliforms or  E.
  coli when any repeat sample tests positive
  for coliform (as specified in §141.21(e));
(2) Violation of the MCL for nitrate, nitrite,  or
  total nitrate  and  nitrite,  as  defined  in
  § 141.62, or when the water system fails to
  take a confirmation sample within 24 hours
  of the system's receipt  of the first sample
  showing  an exceedance of the nitrate  or
  nitrite MCL, as specified in §141.23(f)(2);
                                       535
      203-160  D-18

-------
§141.203
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
TABLE 1 TO §141.202—VIOLATION CATEGORIES
  AND OTHER SITUATIONS REQUIRING A TIER 1
  PUBLIC NOTICE—Continued

(3) Exceedance of the nitrate MCL by non-
  community water systems, where permitted
  to exceed the MCL by the primacy agency
  under  §141.11(d),   as   required  under
  §141.209;
(4) Violation of the  MRDL  for chlorine diox-
  ide, as defined in §141.65(a), when one or
  more samples taken in the distribution sys-
  tem the day following an  exceedance of
  the  MRDL at the  entrance of the distribu-
  tion system exceed the MRDL, or when
  the  water system does  not  take the re-
  quired samples in the distribution system,
  as specified in §141.133(c)(2)(i);
(5)  Violation  of the  turbidity  MCL  under
  §141.13(b),  where the primacy agency de-
  termines after consultation that a Tier 1 no-
  tice is required or where  consultation does
  not  take place within 24 hours after the
  system learns of the violation;
(6) Violation of the Surface Water Treatment
  Rule (SWTR),  Interim Enhanced Surface
  Water Treatment  Rule (IESWTR) or Long
  Term  1  Enhanced  Surface Water  Treat-
  ment Rule  (LT1ESWTR) treatment tech-
  nique requirement resulting from  a  single
  exceedance of the maximum allowable tur-
  bidity limit (as identified in Appendix A),
  where the primacy agency determines after
  consultation that a Tier 1 notice is required
  or where consultation does not take place
  within 24  hours after the system learns of
  the  violation;
(7) Occurrence of a waterborne disease  out-
  break, as defined in §141.2,  or other wa-
  terborne emergency (such as a failure or
  significant interruption in key water treat-
  ment processes, a natural disaster that dis-
  rupts the  water supply or distribution sys-
  tem, or a  chemical spill  or unexpected
  loading of  possible pathogens  into  the
  source  water that  significantly  increases
  the  potential for drinking water contamina-
  tion);
(8) Other violations or situations with  signifi-
  cant potential to have serious adverse ef-
  fects on human health as a result of short-
  term exposure, as determined by the pri-
  macy agency either  in its regulations or on
  a case-by-case basis.

  (b)  When is  the Tier 1 public notice to
be provided? What  additional  steps are
required? Public water systems must:
  (1) Provide a public notice as soon as
practical but  no  later  than  24  hours
after the system  learns of the  viola-
tion;
  (2) Initiate consultation with the pri-
macy agency as soon as practical, but
no later than 24 hours after the public
water system learns of the violation or
situation, to determine additional pub-
lic notice requirements;  and
  (3) Comply with any additional public
notification  requirements  (including
any  repeat  notices or direction on the
duration of the posted notices) that are
established as a result of the consulta-
tion with the primacy agency. Such re-
quirements  may  include the timing,
form, manner,  frequency, and content
of repeat notices (if any) and  other ac-
tions  designed  to  reach  all  persons
served.
  (c) What is the form and manner of the
public   notice?  Public  water  systems
must  provide  the  notice  within 24
hours in a form and manner reasonably
calculated to reach all persons served.
The  form and manner used by the pub-
lic water system are to  fit the specific
situation,  but  must  be designed to
reach  residential, transient, and non-
transient users of the water system. In
order to reach all persons served, water
systems are to use,  at a minimum, one
or more of the following forms of deliv-
ery:
  (1)  Appropriate  broadcast   media
(such as radio and television);
  (2) Posting  of  the notice  in  con-
spicuous locations throughout the  area
served by the water system;
  (3) Hand delivery of the notice to per-
sons served by the water system;  or
  (4) Another delivery method approved
in writing by the primacy agency.

[65 FR 26035, May 4, 2000, as amended at 67
FR 1836, Jan. 14, 2002]

§141.203  Tier  2 Public  Notice—Form,
    manner, and frequency of notice.
  (a) Which violations or situations re-
quire a Tier 2 public notice? Table  1 of
this section lists  the  violation  cat-
egories and other situations  requiring
a Tier  2 public notice.  Appendix A to
this subpart identifies the tier assign-
ment for each specific violation  or sit-
uation.
                                       536

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.203
TABLE 1 TO §141.203—VIOLATION CATEGORIES
  AND OTHER SITUATIONS REQUIRING A TIER 2
  PUBLIC NOTICE

(1)  All violations of the MCL, MRDL,  and
  treatment  technique  requirements,  except
  where a Tier 1  notice is required under
  §141.202(a) or where the primacy agency
  determines that a Tier 1 notice is required;
(2)  Violations of the monitoring and  testing
  procedure  requirements,  where  the  pri-
  macy agency determines that a Tier 2 rath-
  er than a  Tier 3  public notice is required,
  taking into account potential health impacts
  and persistence of the violation; and
(3) Failure to comply with the terms and con-
  ditions of  any variance or exemption in
  place.

  (b) When is the Tier 2 public notice to
be provided?
  (1)  Public  water  systems must  pro-
vide the public notice as soon as prac-
tical, but no later  than 30 days after
the  system learns of the violation. If
the public  notice is posted, the notice
must remain in place for as long as the
violation or situation persists,  but in
no case for less than seven days,  even if
the  violation or situation is resolved.
The primacy agency may, in  appro-
priate circumstances, allow additional
time for the initial  notice  of up to
three months from the date the system
learns of the violation. It is not appro-
priate for the primacy agency to grant
an extension to  the  30-day  deadline for
any unresolved   violation or to allow
across-the-board  extensions by rule or
policy for  other violations or  situa-
tions requiring a Tier 2  public notice.
Extensions  granted by  the  primacy
agency must be in writing.
  (2) The public water system must re-
peat the notice  every three months as
long as the violation or  situation  per-
sists, unless the primacy agency deter-
mines that appropriate circumstances
warrant  a  different repeat notice fre-
quency. In  no circumstance may  the
repeat notice be given less frequently
than once  per year.  It  is not  appro-
priate for the primacy agency to allow
less frequent repeat notice for an MCL
violation  under  the Total  Coliform
Rule or  a  treatment technique viola-
tion under  the   Surface  Water  Treat-
ment Rule  or Interim Enhanced Sur-
face Water Treatment Rule. It is also
not appropriate for the primacy agency
to allow through its  rules  or policies
across-the-board reductions in the re-
peat notice frequency for other ongoing
violations  requiring a Tier 2 repeat no-
tice.  Primacy agency determinations
allowing repeat notices to be given less
frequently  than  once   every   three
months must be in writing.
  (3) For the turbidity violations speci-
fied  in this  paragraph,  public water
systems must consult with the primacy
agency as  soon  as  practical  but no
later than 24 hours  after  the  public
water system  learns of the violation, to
determine  whether a Tier 1 public  no-
tice under  §141.202(a) is required to pro-
tect public health. When consultation
does not take place within the 24-hour
period,  the water  system  must dis-
tribute a Tier 1 notice of the violation
within the next 24 hours (i.e., no later
than 48 hours  after the system learns of
the violation),  following the require-
ments under  §141.202(b)  and (c). Con-
sultation  with the primacy  agency is
required for:
  (i) Violation  of the turbidity MCL
under §141.13(b); or
  (ii)  Violation of the SWTR, IESWTR
or LT1ESWTR treatment technique re-
quirement  resulting from a single  ex-
ceedance  of the  maximum  allowable
turbidity limit.
  (c) What  is the form and manner of the
Tier  2 public notice? Public  water sys-
tems  must provide the  initial  public
notice and any repeat notices in a form
and  manner  that is  reasonably  cal-
culated to  reach persons served in the
required time period. The  form and
manner of the public  notice may vary
based on the specific situation and type
of water system, but it must at a min-
imum  meet  the  following  require-
ments:
  (1) Unless directed otherwise by the
primacy agency in writing, community
water systems must provide notice by:
  (i)  Mail  or  other direct delivery to
each customer receiving a bill and to
other  service connections  to  which
water is delivered by  the public water
system; and
  (ii) Any other method reasonably cal-
culated to  reach other persons  regu-
larly  served  by the  system, if they
would not  normally be reached by the
notice required in paragraph (c)(l)(i) of
                                     537

-------
§141.204
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
this section. Such persons may include
those who do not pay water bills or do
not have service connection addresses
(e.g.,  house  renters, apartment dwell-
ers, university students, nursing home
patients,  prison  inmates, etc.).  Other
methods may include: Publication in a
local  newspaper; delivery of  multiple
copies for  distribution  by  customers
that  provide their  drinking water to
others (e.g., apartment building owners
or large  private employers); posting in
public places served by the system or
on the Internet; or delivery  to commu-
nity organizations.
  (2) Unless  directed otherwise by the
primacy agency  in writing, non-com-
munity  water systems  must  provide
notice by:
  (i) Posting the notice in conspicuous
locations throughout the distribution
system frequented by persons served by
the system, or by mail or direct  deliv-
ery to each customer and service con-
nection (where known); and
  (ii)  Any other method reasonably cal-
culated to reach other persons served
by the system if they would  not nor-
mally be  reached  by the  notice re-
quired in paragraph (c)(2)(i)  of this sec-
tion.  Such  persons  may include  those
served who may not see a posted notice
because the posted notice is  not in a lo-
cation they routinely pass by.  Other
methods may include: Publication in a
local  newspaper  or  newsletter distrib-
uted to customers;  use of E-mail to no-
tify employees or students; or, delivery
of multiple copies in  central locations
(e.g.,  community centers).

[65 PR 26035. May 4, 2000, as amended at 67
FR 1836, Jan. 14, 2002]

§141.204  Tier 3 Public  Notice—Form,
    manner, and frequency of notice.
  (a)  Which  violations  or situations  re-
quire  a Tier  3 public notice? Table  1 of
this  section  lists   the  violation  cat-
egories and  other situations requiring
a Tier 3 public notice.  Appendix  A to
this subpart identifies the  tier assign-
ment for each specific violation or sit-
uation.
                                      538
TABLE 1 TO §141.204—VIOLATION CATEGORIES
  AND OTHER SITUATIONS REQUIRING A TIER 3
  PUBLIC NOTICE

(1) Monitoring violations under 40 CFR part
  141, except where  a Tier 1 notice is re-
  quired under §141.202(a) or where the pri-
  macy agency determines that a Tier 2 no-
  tice is required;
(2) Failure to comply with a testing procedure
  established in  40 CFR  part  141,  except
  where  a Tier 1  notice  is required under
  §141.202(a)) or where the primacy agency
  determines that a Tier 2 notice is required;
(3) Operation under a variance granted under
  Section 1415  or an exemption  granted
  under Section  1416 of the Safe  Drinking
  Water Act;
(4) Availability of  unregulated  contaminant
  monitoring  results,  as  required  under
  §141.207; and
(5) Exceedance  of the fluoride  secondary
  maximum  contaminant level  (SMCL), as
  required under §141.208.

  (b)  When  is the Tier 3 public notice to
be provided?
  (1) Public water  systems  must pro-
vide the public  notice  not  later  than
one year after  the  public water system
learns of the violation or situation or
begins operating under a variance or
exemption.  Following the initial no-
tice, the public water system must re-
peat the notice annually for as long as
the violation,  variance, exemption, or
other situation  persists. If  the public
notice is posted, the  notice must re-
main in  place for as long as  the viola-
tion, variance, exemption, or other sit-
uation persists, but in no case less than
seven days (even if the violation or sit-
uation is resolved).
  (2) Instead of individual Tier 3 public
notices, a public  water system may use
an annual  report  detailing  all viola-
tions and situations that occurred dur-
ing  the  previous  twelve months,  as
long  as  the  timing  requirements  of
paragraph (b)(l) of this section are met.
  (c) What is the  form and manner of the
Tier  3 public notice? Public  water sys-
tems must provide the initial notice
and  any repeat notices in  a form and
manner  that is  reasonably  calculated
to reach persons served in the required
time period. The form and  manner of
the  public  notice  may vary based  on
the specific situation and type of water

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §141.205
system,  but it must at  a minimum
meet the following requirements:
  (1)  Unless directed otherwise by the
primacy agency in writing, community
water systems must provide notice by:
  (i)  Mail  or  other  direct  delivery to
each  customer receiving a bill and to
other service  connections  to  which
water is delivered by the public water
system; and
  (ii) Any other method reasonably cal-
culated to reach  other persons regu-
larly served by the system,  if they
would not  normally be reached by the
notice required in paragraph (c)(l)(i) of
this section. Such persons may include
those who  do not pay water bills or do
not have service connection addresses
(e.g.,  house renters, apartment  dwell-
ers, university students, nursing home
patients, prison inmates,  etc.).  Other
methods may  include: Publication in a
local newspaper;  delivery of multiple
copies for distribution  by  customers
that  provide their drinking water  to
others (e.g., apartment building owners
or large private employers); posting in
public places or on the Internet; or de-
livery to community organizations.
  (2)  Unless directed otherwise by the
primacy agency in  writing, non-com-
munity water systems  must  provide
notice by:
  (i) Posting the notice in conspicuous
locations throughout the  distribution
system frequented by persons served by
the system, or by  mail  or direct deliv-
ery to each customer and service con-
nection (where known); and
  (ii)  Any other method reasonably cal-
culated to reach other persons served
by the system, if  they  would not nor-
mally be  reached by  the notice re-
quired in paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this sec-
tion.  Such persons may include those
who may not see a posted notice be-
cause the  notice  is  not in a  location
they routinely pass by. Other methods
may  include:  Publication  in  a local
newspaper  or newsletter distributed to
customers; use of E-mail to notify em-
ployees or students;  or,  delivery  of
multiple copies in  central locations
(e.g.,  community centers).
  (d)  In  what situations may the Con-
sumer Confidence Report be used to meet
the Tier 3 public notice requirements? For
community water systems, the Con-
sumer Confidence Report (CCE)  re-
quired under Subpart  O of this part
may be used as a vehicle for the initial
Tier 3 public notice and all required re-
peat notices, as long as:
  (1)  The OCR is provided to persons
served no  later than 12 months after
the system learns of the  violation or
situation as required under §141.204(b);
  (2) The Tier 3 notice contained in the
CCR follows the  content requirements
under §141.205; and
  (3) The CCR is distributed following
the   delivery   requirements   under
§141.204(c).

[65 FR 26035, May 4, 2000; 65 FR 38629, June 21,
2000]

§ 141.205  Content of the public notice.
  (a)  What elements must be included in
the public notice for violations of National
Primary  Drinking  Water   Regulations
(NPDWR) or other situations requiring a
public notice? When a public water sys-
tem violates a NPDWR or has a situa-
tion requiring public notification, each
public notice must  include   the  fol-
lowing elements:
  (1) A description of .the  violation or
situation, including the contaminant(s)
of concern, and (as applicable)  the con-
taminant level(s);
  (2)  When  the violation or situation
occurred;
  (3) Any potential adverse health ef-
fects  from the violation or situation,
including the standard  language under
paragraph  (d)(l)  or  (d)(2)  of this sec-
tion, whichever is applicable;
  (4) The population at risk, including
subpopulations particularly vulnerable
if exposed to the contaminant in their
drinking water;
  (5)  Whether alternative  water  sup-
plies should be used;
  (6)  What  actions  consumers should
take,  including when they should seek
medical help, if known;
  (7) What  the system is doing to cor-
rect the violation or situation;
  (8) When  the water system expects to
return to compliance or resolve the sit-
uation;
  (9) The name, business address, and
phone number of the  water system
owner, operator, or designee of  the pub-
lic water system as a source  of addi-
tional information concerning the  no-
tice; and
                                     539

-------
§141.206
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (10) A statement to encourage the no-
tice recipient to distribute  the public
notice to other persons  served, using
the standard language under paragraph
(d)(3) of this section, where applicable.
  (b)  What elements must  be included  in
the public notice for public water systems
operating under a variance or exemption?
  (1) If a public water system has been
granted a variance  or an exemption,
the public notice must contain:
  (i) An explanation  of the reasons for
the variance or exemption;
  (ii) The date on which the variance or
exemption was issued;
  (iii) A brief status report on the steps
the system is  taking to  install treat-
ment, find alternative sources of water,
or  otherwise comply with  the terms
and schedules  of  the variance  or ex-
emption; and
  (iv) A notice of any opportunity for
public input in the review of the vari-
ance or exemption.
  (2) If  a public water system violates
the conditions  of a variance or exemp-
tion,  the  public notice  must  contain
the ten elements listed in paragraph (a)
of this section.
  (c)  How is the public notice to be pre-
sented?
  (1)  Each  public  notice required by
this section:
  (i)  Must   be  displayed  in   a  con-
spicuous way when printed or posted;
  (ii) Must not  contain overly technical
language or very small print;
  (iii) Must not be formatted in a way
that defeats the purpose  of the notice;
  (iv) Must not contain language which
nullifies the purpose of the notice.
  (2)  Each  public  notice required by
this section must comply with multi-
lingual requirements, as follows:
  (i) For public water systems  serving
a   large  proportion  of non-English
speaking consumers, as determined by
the primacy agency, the public notice
must contain information in the appro-
priate language(s) regarding the impor-
tance of the notice or contain a  tele-
phone number or address  where  persons
served may  contact  the  water  system
to obtain a translated copy of  the no-
tice or to request assistance in the ap-
propriate language.
  (ii) In cases where  the primacy agen-
cy has  not  determined  what  con-
stitutes a  large  proportion  of  non-
English speaking consumers, the public
water system must include in the pub-
lic notice the same information as in
paragraph   (c)(2)(i)  of  this  section,
where appropriate to reach a large pro-
portion of  non-English  speaking per-
sons served  by the water system.
  (d) What standard  language must pub-
lic water systems include in their public
notice?  Public  water  systems  are  re-
quired to include the following stand-
ard language in  their public notice:
  (1) Standard health effects language
for MCL  or MRDL violations, treat-
ment technique violations, and viola-
tions of the condition of a variance or
exemption.  Public water systems must
include  in   each  public   notice  the
health effects language specified in  Ap-
pendix B to this subpart corresponding
to each MCL,  MRDL, and treatment
technique violation  listed in  Appendix
A  to this subpart, and for each viola-
tion of a condition of a variance or ex-
emption.
  (2) Standard language  for monitoring
and testing procedure violations. Pub-
lic water systems must include the  fol-
lowing language in their notice, includ-
ing the language necessary to fill in
the blanks,  for all monitoring and test-
ing procedure violations listed  in  Ap-
pendix A to  this subpart:
  We are required to monitor your drinking
water for specific  contaminants on a regular
basis. Results of  regular monitoring are an
indicator of  whether or not  your  drinking
water meets health standards. During [com-
pliance period], we "did not monitor or test"
or "did not complete all monitoring or test-
ing" for [contaminant(s)]. and therefore  can-
not be sure of the quality  of your drinking
water during  that  time.
  (3) Standard  language to encourage
the distribution of the public notice to
all persons  served.  Public water sys-
tems must  include in their notice  the
following language (where  applicable):
  Please share this information with all the
other people who drink this water, especially
those who may not have received this notice
directly (for example, people in apartments,
nursing homes, schools, and businesses).  You
can do this by posting this notice in a public
place or distributing copies by hand or mail.

§ 141.206  Notice to new billing units or
    new customers.
  (a) What is the requirement for commu-
nity water  systems?  Community  water
                                     540

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.208
systems must give a copy of the most
recent public notice for any continuing
violation,  the existence of a variance
or exemption, or other ongoing situa-
tions requiring a  public  notice to all
new billing  units  or new  customers
prior to or at the time service begins.
  (b) What is the  requirement for non-
community water systems? Non-commu-
nity water systems must continuously
post the public notice in conspicuous
locations in order to inform new con-
sumers of any  continuing  violation,
variance or exemption, or other situa-
tion requiring a  public notice  for as
long as the violation, variance, exemp-
tion, or other situation persists.

§ 141.207  Special  notice  of  the avail-
    ability of unregulated contaminant
    monitoring results.
  (a) When is the special  notice to be
given? The owner or operator of a com-
munity water system or non-transient,
non-community water system required
to monitor under §141.40 must  notify
persons served by  the system of the
availability of the results of such sam-
pling no later than 12 months after the
monitoring results are known.
  (b) What is the form and manner of the
special notice? The form and  manner of
the  public notice  must follow  the  re-
quirements for a Tier 3 public notice
prescribed  in §§141.204(c),  (d)(l),  and
(d)(3). The notice must also  identify a
person and provide the telephone num-
ber to contact for information on the
monitoring results.

§ 141.208  Special notice for exceedance
    of the SMCL for fluoride.
  (a) When is the special  notice to be
given? Community water  systems that
exceed  the  fluoride secondary max-
imum  contaminant  level (SMCL)  of 2
mg/1 as specified in  §143.3 (determined
by the last single  sample taken in  ac-
cordance with §141.23), but do not  ex-
ceed the maximum  contaminant level
(MCL) of 4 mg/1 for fluoride (as speci-
fied in §141.62), must provide the public
notice in paragraph (c) of this  section
to persons served. Public notice must
be provided as soon as practical but no
later than 12  months from the day the
water system learns of the exceedance.
A copy  of the notice must also be sent
to all new billing units and new cus-
tomers at the time service begins and
to the State public health officer. The
public water system  must repeat the
notice at least annually for as long as
the SMCL is exceeded. If the public no-
tice is posted, the notice must remain
in place for as long as the SMCL is ex-
ceeded, but in no case less than seven
days (even if the exceedance is  elimi-
nated). On a case-by-case basis, the pri-
macy agency may require an initial no-
tice sooner than 12 months and repeat
notices more frequently than annually.
  (b) What is the form and manner of the
special notice? The  form and manner of
the public notice (including repeat no-
tices) must follow the requirements for
a Tier 3 public notice in §141.204(c) and
(d)(l) and (d)(3).
  (c)  What mandatory language must be
contained in the special notice? The no-
tice must contain  the following  lan-
guage,  including  the  language   nec-
essary to fill in the blanks:

  This is an alert about your drinking water
and a cosmetic  dental problem that might
affect children under nine years of age. At
low levels, fluoride can help prevent cavities,
but children drinking water containing more
than 2 milligrams per liter (mg/1) of fluoride
may develop cosmetic discoloration of their
permanent  teeth  (dental  fluorosis).  The
drinking water provided by your community
water system  [ name]  has  a fluoride con-
centration of [insert value] mg/1.
  Dental fluorosis,  in its moderate or severe
forms, may result in a brown staining and/or
pitting of the permanent teeth. This problem
occurs only in developing teeth, before they
erupt from the  gums. Children under nine
should be provided with alternative sources
of drinking water or water that has  been
treated to remove  the fluoride to avoid the
possibility of staining and  pitting of their
permanent teeth. You may also want to con-
tact your dentist about proper use by young
children  of fluoride-containing  products.
Older children and adults may safely drink
the water.
  Drinking  water  containing more than 4
mg/L  of  fluoride (the  U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency's  drinking water stand-
ard)  can  increase  your risk  of developing
bone disease. Your drinking water does not
contain  more than 4 mg/1  of fluoride, but
we're required to notify  you when we dis-
cover that the fluoride levels in your drink-
ing water exceed 2 mg/1 because of this cos-
metic dental problem.
  For more information, please call [name of
water system contact] of [nanie of commu-
nity water system] at [phone number]. Some
                                      541

-------
§141.209
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
home water treatment units are also avail-
able to remove fluoride from drinking water.
To learn more about available home water
treatment units, you may call NSF Inter-
national at 1-877-8-NSF-HELP."

§141.209   Special  notice   for  nitrate
   exceedances above MCL  by  non-
   conununity water systems (NCWS),
   where  granted permission by  the
   primacy agency under §141.11(d)
  (a) When is  the  special  notice  to be
given? The owner or operator of a non-
community water system granted per-
mission by the primacy agency  under
§141.11(d)  to exceed the  nitrate MCL
must provide notice to persons served
according  to  the requirements  for  a
Tier 1  notice under §141.202(a)  and (b).
  (b) What is the form and manner of the
special notice? Non-community  water
systems granted permission by the pri-
macy  agency  to  exceed  the  nitrate
MCL under §141.11(d) must provide con-
tinuous posting- of the fact that nitrate
levels exceed 10 rag/I  and the potential
health effects of exposure, according to
the requirements for  Tier 1 notice de-
livery under § 141.202(c) and the content
requirements under §141.205.

§ 141.210 Notice by primacy agency on
    behalf of the public water system.
  (a) May  the primacy agency give the
notice on behalf of the public  water sys-
tem? The primacy agency may give the
notice required by this subpart on be-
half of the owner and operator of the
public  water  system if the primacy
agency complies with the requirements
of this subpart.
  (b)  What is the responsibility  of the
public water system when notice is given
by the primacy agency? The owner or op-
erator of the public  water system re-
mains responsible for ensuring that the
requirements of this subpart are met.
     APPENDIX A TO SUBPART Q OF PART 141—NPDWR VIOLATIONS AND OTHER
                     SITUATIONS REQUIRING PUBLIC NOTICE *
Contaminant
1 Violations of National Primary Drinking
Water Regulations (NPDWR) 3
A Microbiological Contaminants
1 Total coliform
2 Fecal cohform/E coll . .
3 Turbidity MCL .
4 Turbidity MCL (average of 2
days' samples >5 NTU) . .
5 Turbidity (for TT violations result-
ing from a single exceedance of
maximum allowable turbidity
level) .. .








6 Surface Water Treatment Rule
violations, other than violations
resulting from single exceedance
of max allowable turbidity level
(TT) .
7 Interim Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule violations, other
than violations resulting from sin-
gle exceedance of max turbidity
level (TT)


8 Filter Backwash Recycling Rule
violations 	
MCL/MRDL/TT violations2
Tier of public no-
tice required



2
1
2

52, 1



62, 1












2




72



2
Citation



141 63(a)
141 63(b)
141 13(a)

141 13(b)



141 71(a)(2),
141 71(c)(2)(i),
141 73(a)(2),
141 73(b)(2),
141 73(c)(2),
141 73(d),
141 I73(a)(2),
141 173(b),
141 551(b)




141 70-141 73




141 170-141.173,
141.500-141 553


141.76
Monitoring & testing procedure viola-
tions
Tier of public no-
tice required



3
"1,3
3

3



3












3




3



3
Citation



141 21(a)-(e)
141 21(e)
141 22

141 22



141 74(a)(1),
141 74(b)(2),
141.74(c)(1),
141 174,
141 560(a)-(C),
141 561







141.74




141 172, 141 174,
141.530-141.544,
141 560-141 564

141 76
                                     542

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 141,Subpt. Q, App. A
Contaminant
9 Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface
Water Treatment Rule violations

B Inorganic Chemicals (lOCs)
1 Antimony
2 Arsenic
3 Asbestos (fibers >1 0 urn)
4 Barium
5 Beryllium
6 Cadmium
7 Chromium (total)
8 Cyanide
9 Fluoride
10 Mercury (inorganic)
MCL/MRDL/TT violations2
Tier of public no-
tice required

2


£
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
11 Nitrate . I 1
I
12 Nitrite

13 Total Nitrate and Nitrite
14 Selenium
15 Thallium
C. Lead and Copper Rule (Action Level for
lead is 0 015 mg/L, for copper is 1 3 mg/
L)
1 Lead and Copper Rule (TT)
D. Synthetic Organic Chemicals (SOCs)
1 2,4-D
2 2,4,5-TP (Sllvex) .
3 Alachlor
4 Atrazine
5 Benzo(a)pyrene (PAHs)
6 Carbofuran
7 Chlordane
8 Dalapon
9 Di (2-ethylhexyl) adipate
10 Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
1 1 Dibromochloropropane
12 Dinoseb
13 Dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD)
14 Diquat
15 Endothall
16 Endnn
17 Ethylene dibromide
18 Glyphosate
19 Heptachlor
20 Heptachlor epoxide
21 Hexachlorobenzene
22 Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
23 Lmdane
24 Methoxychlor
25 Oxamyl (Vydate)
26 Pentachlorophenoi
27 Picloram
28 Polychlonnated biphenyls
(PCBs)
29 Simazme
30 Toxaphene
E Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs)
1 Benzene
2 Carbon tetrachlonde
3 Chlorobenzene
(monochlorobenzene)
4 o-Dichlorobenzene
5 p-Dichlorobenzene
6 1,2-Dichloroethane
7 1,1-Dichloroethylene
8 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
9 trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
10 Dichloromethane
11 1,2-Dichloropropane
12 Ethylbenzene
1

1
2
2



2

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

2
2
2

2
2

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Citation

141 500-141 553


141 62(b)
8 141 62(b)
141 62(b)
141 62(b)
141 62(b)
141 62(b)
141 62(b)
141 62(b)
141 62(0)
141 62(b)
141 62(b)

141 62(b)

141 62(b)
141 62(b)
141 62(b)



141 80-141 85

141 61(c)
141 61(c)
141 61(c)
141 61 (C)
141 61 (c)
141 61 (c)
141 61 (c)
141 61 (c)
141 61 (c)
141 61(c)
141 61(c)
141 61(c)
141 61(c)
141 61 (c)
141 61 (c)
141 61(0)
141 61(c)
141 61(c)
141 61(0)
141 61(c)
141 61(c)
141 61(0)
141 61 (c)
141 61(0)
141 61(c)
141 61 (C)
141 61(0)

141 61 (c)
141 61(c)
141 61 (c)

141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)

141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)
141 61(a)
141 61 (a)
141 61(a)
141 61(a)
141 61(a)
141 61(a)
141 61(a)
141 61(a)
Monitoring & testing procedure viola-
tions
Tier of public no-
tice required

3


3
3
3
3
3
Citation

141 530-141 544,
141 560-141 564

141 23(a), (c)
9 141 23(a), (c)
141 23(a)-(b)
141 23(a), (c)
141 23(a), (c)
3 j 141 23(a), (c)
3 ! 141 23(a), (c)
3
3
3
101, 3

1°1, 3

3
3
3



3

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

3
3
3

3
3

3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
141 23(a), (c)
141 23(a), (c)
141 23(a), (c)
141 23(a), (d),
141 23(f)(2)
141 23(a), (e),
141 23(f)(2)
141 23(a)
141 23(a), (c)
141 23(a), (c)



141 86-141 89

141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)
141 24(h)

141 24(h)
141 24{h)
141 24(h)

141 24(f)
141 24(f)

141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
                                543

-------
Pt. 141,Subpt. Q, App. A
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant
13 Styrene
14 Tetrachloroethylene
15 Toluene
16 1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
17 1,1,1-Tnchloroethane
18 1,1,2-Tnchloroethane
19. Trichloroethylene
20 Vinyl chloride .
21 Xylenes (total) .
F Radioactive Contaminants
1 Beta/photon emitters

2 Alpha emitters -

3 Combined radium (226 and 228)

4 Uranium

G Disinfection Byproducts (DBPs), Byprod-
uct Precursors, Disinfectant Residuals
Where disinfection is used in the treat-
ment of drinking water, disinfectants com-
bine with organic and inorganic matter
present in water to form chemicals called
disinfection byproducts (DBPs) EPA sets
standards for controlling the levels of dis-
infectants and DBPs in drinking water, in-
cluding trihalomethanes (THMs) and
haloacetic acids (HAAs) 11
1 Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

2 Haloacetic Acids (HAAS)
3 Bromate
4 Chlorite
5 Chlorine (MRDL)
6 Chlorarrane (MRDL) 	
7 Chlorine dioxide (MRDL), where
any 2 consecutive daily samples
at entrance to distribution system
only are above MRDL

8 Chlorine dioxide (MRDL), where
sample(s) in distribution system
the next day are also above
MRDL

9. Control of DBF precursors—
TOC (TT)
10 Bench marking and disinfection
profiling

1 1 Development of monitoring plan
H Other Treatment Techniques
1 Acrylamide (TT)
2 Epichlorohydrin (TT)
11 Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring 15
A Unregulated contaminants
B Nickel
III Public Notification for Variances and Ex-
emptions
A Operation under a variance or exemption
B Violation of conditions of a variance or
exemption

IV Other Situations Requiring Public Notifi-
cation
A Fluoride secondary maximum contami-
nant level (SMCL) exceedance
B Exceedance of nitrate MCL for non-com-
munity systems, as allowed by primacy
agency
MCL/MRDL/TT violations2
Tier of public no-
tice required
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

2

2

2

92












2

2
2
2
2
2



2




"1


2

N/A

N/A

2
2

N/A
N/A


3

2




3


1
Citation
141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)
141 61 (a)

141 66(d)

141 66(c)

141 66(b)

141 66(e)












12141 12,
141 64(a)
141 64(a)
141 64(a)
141 64(a)
141 65(a)
141 65(a)



141 65(a),
141 133(c)(3)



141 65(a),
141 133(c)(3)

141 135(a)-(b)

N/A

N/A

141 111
141 111

N/A
N/A


161415, 1416,

1415, 1416,
"142307



1433


141 11(d)
Monitoring & testing procedure viola-
tions
Tier of public no-
tice required
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

3

3

3

103












3

3
3
3
3
3



2'3, 3




1


3

3

3

N/A
N/A

3
3


N/A

N/A




N/A


N/A
Citation
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)
141 24(f)

141 25(3)
141 26(b)
141 25(3)
141 26(a)
141 25(3)
141 26(3)
141 25(a)
141 26(a)











141 30,
141 132(a)-(t>)
141 132(a)-(b)
141 132(a)-(b)
141 132(a)-(b)
141 132(a), (c)
141 132(a), (c)



141 132(a), (c),
141 133(c)(2)



141 132(a), (C),
141 133(c)(2)

141 132(a), (d)

141 172 141 530-
141 544
141 132(f)

N/A
N/A

141 40
141 23(c), (k)


N/A

N/A




N/A


N/A
                                  544

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
               Pt. 141,Subpt. Q, App. A

Contaminant
C. Availability of unregulated contaminant
monitoring data
D Waterborne disease outbreak

E Other waterborne emergency18
F Other situations as determined by pri-
macy agency
MCUMRDL/TT violations2
Tier of public no-
tice required

3
1

1

19 1,2, 3
Citation

141 40
141 2,
141 71(c)(2)(ll)
N/A

N/A
Monitoring & testing procedure viola-
tions
Tier of public no-
tice required

N/A
N/A

N/A

N/A
Citation

N/A
N/A

N/A

N/A
          APPENDIX A—ENDNOTES

  1. Violations and other situations not list-
ed in  this table (e.g., reporting violations
and failure to prepare Consumer Confidence
Reports), do not require notice, unless other-
wise determined by the primary agency. Pri-
macy agencies may, at their option, also re-
quire  a  more  stringent public  notice tier
(e.g., Tier 1 instead of Tier 2 or Tier 2 instead
of Tier 3) for specific violations and situa-
tions listed in this Appendix, as authorized
under §141.202(a) and §141.203(a).
  2.  MCL—Maximum  contaminant   level,
MRDL—Maximum   residual   disinfectant
level, TT—Treatment technique
  3. The term Violations of National Pri-
mary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR)
is used here to include violations of MCL,
MRDL,  treatment  technique,  monitoring,
and testing procedure requirements.
  4. Failure to test for fecal coliform or E.
coli is  a Tier 1 violation if testing is not done
after  any repeat sample tests  positive for
coliform. All  other  total   coliform  moni-
toring and testing  procedure violations are
Tier 3.
  5. Systems that violate the turbidity MCL
of 5 NTU based on an average  of  measure-
ments  over two consecutive  days must con-
sult with the primacy agency within 24 hours
after learning of the violation. Based  on this
consultation, the primacy agency may subse-
quently  decide to  elevate the violation  to
Tier 1. If a system is unable to make contact
with the primacy agency in  the  24-hour pe-
riod, the violation is automatically elevated
to Tier 1.
  6. Systems with treatment technique viola-
tions involving a single exceedance of a max-
imum  turbidity  limit  under  the Surface
Water  Treatment Rule (SWTR), the Interim
Enhanced Surface  Water  Treatment Rule
(IESWTR), or the  Long Term  1 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR)
are required to consult with  the primacy
agency within 24 hours after learning of the
violation. Based  on this consultation,  the
primacy  agency may subsequently decide to
elevate the violation to Tier 1. If a system is
unable to make contact with the primacy
agency in the 24-hour period,  the violation is
automatically elevated to Tier 1.
  7. Most of the requirements of the Interim
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (63
FR 69477) (§§141.170-141.171, 141.173-141.174) be-
come effective January 1, 2002 for Subpart H
systems (surface water systems and ground
water systems under the  direct influence of
surface water) serving at least 10,000 persons.
However, §141.172  has some  requirements
that become effective as early as April 16,
1999. The Surface Water Treatment Rule re-
mains in effect  for systems serving at least
10,000 persons even after 2002;  the Interim
Enhanced  Surface Water Treatment Rule
adds additional requirements and does  not in
many cases supercede the  SWTR.
  8. The arsenic MCL citations are effective
January 23, 2006.  Until then,  the citations
are §141.11(b) and §141.23(n).
  9. The uranium MCL Tier 2 violation cita-
tions are effective December 8, 2003 for all
community water systems.
  10. The uramum Tier 3  violation citations
are effective December 8, 2000 for all commu-
nity water systems.
  11. The arsenic Tier 3 violation  MCL cita-
tions are effective January 23,  2006.  Until
then, the citations are §141.23(a), (1).
  12. Failure to  take a confirmation sample
within 24 hours for nitrate or nitrite after an
initial sample exceeds the MCL  is a Tier 1
violation.  Other monitoring violations  for
nitrate are Tier 3.
  13. Subpart  H community and non-tran-
sient non-community systems serving 210,000
must comply with new DBF MCLs, disinfect-
ant MRDLs, and related monitoring require-
ments beginning January 1, 2002. All  other
community and  non-transient non-commu-
nity systems  must  meet  the  MCLs  and
MRDLs beginning January 1, 2004.  Subpart H
transient non-community systems serving
10,000 or more  persons and using chlorine di-
oxide as a disinfectant or  oxidant must com-
ply with the chlorine dioxide MRDL begin^
ning January  1, 2002. Subpart H transient
non-community  systems serving fewer than
10,000 persons  and using only ground  water
not  under the  direct influence  of surface
water and using chlorine dioxide as a  dis-
infectant or oxidant must comply with  the
chlorine dioxide MRDL beginning January 1,
2004.
                                         545

-------
Pt.  141,Subpt. Q, App. B
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  14. §141.12 will no longer apply after Janu-
ary 1, 2004.
  15. Failure to monitor for chlorine dioxide
at the entrance to the  distribution system
the day after exceeding the MRDL at the en-
trance to  the distribution system is a  Tier 2
violation.
  16. If any daily sample  taken at the en-
trance to  the  distribution system exceeds
the MRDL for chlorine dioxide and one or
more  samples taken in the distribution sys-
tem the next day exceed the MRDL,  Tier 1
notification is required. Failure to take the
required samples in the distribution system
after  the  MRDL is exceeded  at  the  entry
point also triggers Tier 1 notification.
  17. Some water systems  must monitor for
certain unregulated contaminants listed in
§141.40.
  18. This citation refers to §§ 1415 and  1416 of
the Safe Drinking Water Act. §§ 1415 and 1416
require that "a schedule prescribed  .  . for a
public water system granted a variance [or
exemption] shall require compliance by the
system. . ."
  19. In addition to §§1415 and 1416 of the Safe
Drinking Water Act, 40 CFR 142.307 specifies
the items and schedule milestones that must
be included in a variance for small systems.
  20. Other waterborne emergencies require a
Tier 1 public notice under §141.202(a) for situ-
ations that do not meet the definition of a
waterborne disease outbreak given in 40 CFR
141.2 but that still have the potential to nave
serious adverse effects on health as a result
of short-term  exposure. These could include
outbreaks  not related to  treatment  defi-
ciencies, as well as situations that have the
potential  to cause outbreaks,  such as fail-
ures  or significant interruption  in  water
treatment  processes, natural disasters that
disrupt the water supply or distribution sys-
tem, chemical spills, or unexpected loading
of possible pathogens into  the source water.
  21. Primacy  agencies may place other situ-
ations in any  tier they believe  appropriate,
based on threat to public health.

[65 FR 26035, May 4, 2000,  as amended at 65
FR 76750, Dec.7, 2000; 66 FR 7065,  Jan. 22, 2001;
66 FR 31104, June 8, 2001; 67 FR 1836 Jan. 14,
2002]

  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38356, June
29, 2004, appendix A to subpart Q of part 141
was amended  in  entry I.A.(8)  by  removing
the citation in the third column "141.76" and
adding in its place "141.76(c)" and by remov-
ing the citation in the fifth column "141.76"
and adding in  its place "141.76 (b), (di", and in
endnote 1 by removing the words "reporting
violations  and" from the first parenthetical
phrase, effective July 29, 2004.
  APPENDIX B TO SUBPART Q OF PART 141—STANDARD HEALTH EFFECTS LANGUAGE
                              FOR PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Contaminant
MCLG1
mg/L
MCL2 mg/L
Standard health effects
language
for public notification
                         National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR)
                                 A Microbiological Contaminants
1 a Total coliform



1b Fecal coliform/E
COll





2a Turbidity (MCL)4





2b Turbidity (SWTR
TT)6




Zero



Zero






None





None





See footnote 3



Zero






1 NTU5/5
NTU




TT7





Coliforms are bacteria that are naturally present in the environment
and are used as an indicator that other, potentially-harmful, bac-
teria may be present Coliforms were found in more samples than
allowed and this was a warning of potential problems
Fecal coliforms and E coli are bacteria whose presence indicates
that the water may be contaminated with human or animal
wastes Microbes in these wastes can cause short-term effects,
such as diarrhea, cramps, nausea, headaches, or other symp-
toms They may pose a special health risk for infants, young chil-
dren, some of the elderly, and people with severely compromised
immune systems
Turbidity has no health effects However, turbidity can interfere with
disinfection and provide a medium for microbial growth Turbidity
may indicate the presence of disease-causing orgamsms These
organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause
symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea and associated
headaches
Turbidity has no health effects However, turbidity can interfere with
disinfection and provide a medium for microbial growth Turbidity
may indicate the presence of disease-causing organisms These
organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause
symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea and associated
headaches
                                          546

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                       Pt.  Ul.Subpt. Q, App.  B
Contaminant
2c. Turbidity (IESWTR
TTandLTIESWTR
TT)8
MCLG1 mg/L
None
MCL2 mg/L
TT
Standard health effects language for public notification
Turbidity has no health effects However, turbidity can interfere with
disinfection and provide a medium for microbiat growth Turbidity
may indicate the presence of disease-causing organisms. These
organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause
symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea and associated
headaches
 B. Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR), Intenm Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (IESWTR), Long Term 1 Enhanced
           Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR) and the Filter Backwash Recycling Rule (FBRR) violations
3. Giardia lamblia
(SWTR/IESWTR/
LT1ESWTR)

4. Viruses (SWTR/
IESWTR/
LT1ESWTR).
5. Heterotrophic plate
count (HPC) bac-
teria9 (SWTR/
IESWTR/
LT1ESWTR)
6. Legionella (SWTR/
IESWTR/
LT1ESWTR)
7. Cryptospondium
(IESWTR/FBRR/
LT1ESWTR)
Zero

















TT10

















Inadequately treated water may contain disease-causing organisms.
These organisms include bacteria, viruses, -and parasites which
can cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea, and as-
sociated headaches














                                          C. Inorganic Chemicals (lOCs)
8. Antimony      	


9. Arsenic'1     ....



10. Asbestos (10 urn)


11 Barium


12 Beryllium

13 Cadmium

14. Chromium (total)  ..

15 Cyanide


16 Fluoride
17 Mercury (inorganic)


18 Nitrate



19 Nitrite
                      0006
7MFL'2
0004

0005

01

02



40
                      0.002
                                     0006
               0010
               7MFL
0004

0005

01

02



40
                                     0002
Some people who drink water containing antimony well in excess of
  the MCL over many years could experience increases in blood
  cholesterol and decreases in blood sugar
Some people  who drink water containing arsenic in excess of the
  MCL over many years could  experience skin damage or prob-
  lems with their circulatory  system, and may have an increased
  risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing asbestos in excess of the
  MCL over many years may have an increased risk, of developing
  benign intestinal polyps
Some people  who drink water containing barium in excess of the
  MCL over many  years  could  experience an increase  in  their
  blood pressure
Some people who drink water containing beryllium well in excess of
  the MCL over many years could develop intestinal lesions
Some people who drink water containing cadmium in excess of the
  MCL over many years could expenence kidney damage
Some people who use water  containing chromium well in excess of
  the MCL over many years could experience allergic dermatitis
Some people who drink water containing cyanide well  in excess of
  the MCL over many years could  experience nerve  damage or
  problems with their thyroid
Some people  who drink water containing fluoride in excess of the
  MCL over many years could get bone disease, including pain and
  tenderness of the  bones  Fluoride in  drinking water at half the
  MCL or  more  may cause  mottling of children's teeth, usually in
  children less than nine years  old. Mottling, also known as dental
  fluorosis, may include brown  staining and/or pitting of the teeth,
  and occurs  only in developing teeth before they erupt from the
  gums
Some people who drink water containing inorganic mercury  well m
  excess of the MCL over many years  could experience  kidney
  damage
Infants below the age of six months who drink water containing ni-
  trate in excess of the MCL could become seriously ill and, if un-
  treated, may die  Symptoms include shortness of breath and blue
  baby syndrome
Infants below the age of six months who drink water containing ni-
  trite in excess of the MCL  could become seriously ill and, if un-
  treated, may die  Symptoms include shortness of breath and blue
  baby syndrome.
                                                     547

-------
Pt.  141,Subpt. Q, App. B
                                                  40 CFR  Ch.  I (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant
20 Total Nitrate and
Nitrite
21 Selenium
22 Thallium
MCLG1 mg/L
10
005
00005
MCL2 mg/L
10
005
0002
Standard health effects language for public notification
Infants below the age of six months who drink water containing ni-
trate and nitrite in excess of the MCL could become seriously ill
and, if untreated, may die Symptoms include shortness of breath
and blue baby syndrome
Selenium is an essential nutrient However, some people who drink
water containing selenium in excess of the MCL over many years
could experience hair or fingernail losses, numbness in fingers or
toes, or problems with their circulation.
Some people who drink water containing thallium in excess of the
MCL over many years could experience hair loss, changes in
their blood, or problems with their kidneys, intestines, or liver
                                             D Lead and Copper Rule
23 Lead
24 Copper
                       Zero
                               Infants and children who drink water containing  lead in  excess of
                                the action level could experience delays in their physical or men-
                                tal  development Children could show slight deficits in attention
                                span and learning abilities Adults who drink this water over many
                                years could develop kidney problems or high blood pressure
                               Copper is an essential nutrient, but  some people who drink water
                                containing copper in excess of the action level over a relatively
                                short amount of time could  experience gastrointestinal distress
                                Some people who drink water containing copper in excess of the
                                action level over many years could suffer liver or kidney damage
                                People with Wilson's Disease should consult their personal doc-
                                tor
                                       E  Synthetic Organic Chemicals (SOCs)
25 2,4-D


26 2,4,5-TP (Sllvex)

27 Alachlor



28 Atrazme


29. Benzo(a)pyrene
  (PAHs)

30 Carbofuran


31 Chlordane



32 Dalapon


33 Di(2-ethylhexyl) adi-
34  Di(2-ethylhexyl)
  phthalate
35  Dibromochloro-
  propane (DBCP)

36  Dmoseb
37  Dioxm (2,3,7,8-
  TCDD)

38  Diquat
007


005

Zero



0003


Zero


004


Zero



02


04



Zero



Zero


0007


Zero
                                      007


                                      005

                                      0002



                                      0003


                                      00002


                                      004
                                      02
                                      04
                                       0006
                                       0007
                                       3x10-8
Some people who drink water containing the weed killei 2,4-D well
  in  excess  of the MCL over many years could experience prob-
  lems with their kidneys, liver, or adrenal glands
Some people who drink water  containing silvex in excess of the
  MCL over many years could experience liver problems
Some people who drink water containing alachlor in excess of the
  MCL over  many years could have problems with their eyes,  liver,
  kidneys, or spleen, or experience anemia,  and may have an  in-
  creased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing atrazme well in excess of
  the MCL over many years could experience  problems with their
  cardiovascular system or reproductive difficulties
Some people who drink water containing benzo(a)pyrene m excess
  of  the  MCL over  many years may  experience reproductive dif-
  ficulties and may have an increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing carbofuran in excess of
  the MCL over many years could experience  problems with their
  blood, or nervous or reproductive systems
Some people who drink water containing chlordane in excess of the
  MCL over  many years could experience problems wilh their liver
  or  nervous system, and may  have  an increased risk of getting
  cancer
Some people who drink water containing dalapon well in excess of
  the MCL  over many  years  could  experience  minor kidney
  changes
Some people who drink water containing di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
  well in excess of the MCL  over many years  could experience
  toxic effects such as weight loss, liver enlargement or  possible
  reproductive difficulties
Some people who drink water containing di(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate
  well in excess of the  MCL over many years may have  problems
  with their  liver,  or experience reproductive difficulties,  and may
  have an increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing  DBCP in excess of the
  MCL over many years  could experience reproductive difficulties
  and may have an  increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing dinoseb well in excess of
  the MCL over many years could experience reproductive difficul-
  ties
Some people who drink water  containing dioxm in excess of the
  MCL over many years  could experience reproductive difficulties
  and may have an  increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing  diquat in excess of the
  MCL over  many years could get cataracts
                                                       548

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                     Pt. 141,Subpt.  Q,  App. B
Contaminant
39 Endothall


40 Endnn

41 Ethylene dibromtde



42 Glyphosate ....


43 Heptachlor . .


44. Heptachlor epoxide


45 Hexachlorobenzene



46 Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene

47 Lindane . .


48 Methoxychlor


49. Oxamyl (Vydate)


50 Pentachlorophenol



51 Picloram

52. Polychlormated
biphenyls (PCBs)



53 Simazine


54 Toxaphene



MCLG i mg/L
01


0002

Zero



07


Zero


Zero


Zero



0.05


0.0002


004


02


Zero



05

Zero




0004


Zero



MCL2mg/L
01


0002

0 00005



0.7


00004


00002


0001



005


00002


004


02


0.001



05

00005




0004


0003



Standard health effects language for public notification
Some people who drink water containing endothall in excess of the
MCL over many years could experience problems with their stom-
ach or intestines
Some people who drink water containing endnn in excess of the
MCL over many years could experience liver problems
Some people who drink water containing ethylene dibromide in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
with their liver, stomach, reproductive system, or kidneys, and
may have an increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing glyphosate in excess of
the MCL over many years could experience problems with their
kidneys or reproductive difficulties
Some people who drink water containing heptachlor ur excess of
the MCL over many years could expenence liver damage and
may have an increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing heptachlor epoxide in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years could experience liver damage.
and may have an increased risk of getting cancer.
Some people who drink water containing hexachJorobenzene in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
with their liver or kidneys, or adverse reproductive effects, and
may have an increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing
hexachlorocyclopentadiene well in excess of the MCL over many
years could experience problems with their kidneys or stomach
Some people who drink water containing lindane in excess of the
MCL over many years could experience problems with their kid-
neys or liver.
Some people who drink water containing methoxychlor in excess of
the MCL over many years could expenence reproductive difficul-
ties
Some people who drink water containing oxamyl in excess of the
MCL over many years could expenence slight nervous system ef-
fects
Some people who drink water containing pentachlorophenol in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
with their liver or kidneys, and may have an increased risk of get-
ting cancer
Some people who drink water containing picloram in excess of the
MCL over many years could expenence problems with their liver.
Some people who drink water containing PCBs in excess of the
MCL over many years could experience changes in their skin,
problems with their thymus gland, immune deficiencies, or repro-
ductive or nervous system difficulties, and may have an in-
creased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing simazine in excess of the
MCL over many years could experience problems with their
blood
Some people who drink water containing toxaphene in excess of
the MCL over many years could have probtems with their kid-
neys, liver, or thyroid, and may have an increased risk of getting
cancer
                                      F Volatile Organic Chemicals (VOCs)
55. Benzene 	
56 Carbon tetra-
  chloride

57. Chlorobenzene
  (monochloro- ben-
  zene).
58. o-Dichlorobenzene
59 p-Dichlorobenzene
                      Zero
                      Zero
01
                      06
                      0075
                                    0005
                                    0.005
              0.1
                                    06
                                    0075
Some people who drink water containing benzene in excess of the
  MCL over many years could expenence anemia or a decrease in
  blood platelets, and may have an increased nsk of getting can-
  cer.
Some people who drink water containing carbon tetrachloride in ex-
  cess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
  with their liver and may have an increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing Chlorobenzene in excess
  of  the MCL over many years could experience problems with
  their liver or kidneys
Some people who drink water containing o-dichlorobenzene well in
  excess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
  with their liver, kidneys, or circulatory systems.
Some people who drink water containing p-dichlorobenzene in ex-
  cess of the MCL over many years could  experience anemia,
  damage to their liver, Kidneys,  or spleen,  or changes in their
  blood
                                                   549

-------
Pt. 141,Subpt.  Q, App. B
                                40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant
60 1 ,2-Dichloroethane


61 1,1-
Dichloroethylene

62 c/s-1,2-
Dichloroethylene

63 trans-1,2-
Dichloroethylene.

64 Dichloromethane


65 1,2-
Dichloropropane

66 Ethylbenzene


67 Styrene


68 Tetrachloroethylene


69. Toluene


70 1,2,4-
Tnchlorobenzene

71. 1,1,1-Tnchloro-
ethane

72 1,1,2-Tnchloro-
ethane

73 Tnchloroethylene


74 Vinyl chloride


75 Xylenes (total)


MCLG1 mg/L
Zero


0007


007


01


Zero


Zero


07


01


Zero


1


007


02


0003


Zero


Zero


10


MCL2 mg/L
0005


0007


007


01


0005


0005


07


01


0005


1


007


02


0005


0005


0002


10


Standard health effects language for public notification
Some people who drink water containing 1 ,2-dichloroethane in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years may have an increased risk of
getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing 1,1-dichloroethylene in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
with their liver
Some people who drink water containing cis-1 ,2-dichloroethylene in
excess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
with their liver
Some people who drink water containing trans-1 ,2-dichloroethylene
well in excess of the MCL over many years could experience
problems with their liver.
Some people who dnnk water containing dichloromethane m excess
of the MCL over many years could have liver problems and may
have an increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing 1 ,2-dichloropropane in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years may have an increased risk of
getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing ethylbenzene well in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
with their liver or kidneys
Some people who drink water containing styrene well in excess of
the MCL over many years could have problems with their liver.
kidneys, or circulatory system
Some people who drink water containing tetrachloroethylene in ex-
cess of the MCL over many years could have problems with their
liver, and may have an increased risk of getting cancel
Some people who drink water containing toluene well in excess of
the MCL over many years could have problems with their nerv-
ous system, kidneys, or liver
Some people who drink water containing 1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene
well in excess of the MCL over many years could experience
changes in their adrenal glands.
Some people who drink water containing 1,1,1-trichloroethane in
excess of the MCL over many years could experience problems
with their liver, nervous system, or circulatory system
Some people who drink water containing 1,1,2-tnchloroethane well
in excess of the MCL over many years could have problems with
their liver, kidneys, or immune systems.
Some people who drink water containing trichloroethylene in excess
of the MCL over many years could experience problems with
their liver and may have an increased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing vinyl chloride in excess of
the MCL over many years may have an increased risk of getting
cancer
Some people who drink water containing xylenes in excess of the
MCL over many years could experience damage to their nervous
system
76 Beta/photon
  emitters.
77 Alpha emitters
78 Combined radium
  (226 & 228)
                      Zero
                      Zero
                      Zero
                                          G Radioactive Contaminants
                                    4 mrem/yr15
                                    15pCi/L1
5 pCi/L
Certain minerals are radioactive and may emit forms of radiation
  known as photons and  beta radiation  Some people who drink
  water containing beta and photon emitters in excess of the MCL
  over many years may have an increased risk of getting cancer
Certain minerals are radioactive and may emit a form of radiation
  known as alpha  radiation  Some people who drink water con-
  taining alpha emitters in excess of the MCL over many years may
  have an increased risk of getting  cancer
Some people who drink water containing radium 226  or 228 in ex-
  cess of the MCL over many years may have an increased risk of
  getting cancer
                                                   550

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                        Pt. 141,Subpt. Q, App. B
Contaminant
79 Uranium^
MCLG1 mg/L
Zero
MCL2 mg/L
30ng/L
Standard health effects language for public notification
Some people who drink water containing uranium in excess of the
MCL over many years may have an increased risk of getting can-
cer and kidney toxicity
H Disinfection Byproducts (DBFs), Byproduct Precursors, and Disinfectant Residuals Where disinfection is used in the treat-
  ment of drinking water, disinfectants combine with organic and inorganic matter present in water to form chemicals called dis-
  infection byproducts (DBFs)  EPA sets standards for controlling the levels of disinfectants and DBPs in drinking water, includ-
  ing tnhalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs)"
80 Total
tnhalomethanes
(TTHMs)

81 Haloacetic Acids
(HAA)

82. Bromate


83 Chlorite . . ..




84 Chlorine



85 Chlorarranes




86a Chlorine dioxide,
where any 2 con-
secutive daily sam-
ples taken at the en-
trance to the distribu-
tion system are
above the MRDL






86b Chlorine dioxide,
where one or more
distribution system
samples are above
the MRDL








87 Control of DBP pre-
cursors (TOC)





N/A



N/A


Zero


008




4 (MRDLG) 2'



4 (MRDLG)




0 8 (MRDLG)












0 8 (MRDLG)












None






010/0 080" is



0060 20


0010


1 0




40 (MRDL) 22



4 0 (MRDL)




0 8 (MRDL)












0 8 (MRDL)












TT






Some people who drink water containing tnhalomethanes in excess
of the MCL over many years may experience problems with their
liver, kidneys, or central nervous system, and may have an in-
creased risk of getting cancer
Some people who drink water containing haloacetic acids in excess
of the MCL over many years may have an increased risk of get-
ting cancer
Some people who drink water containing bromate in excess of the
MCL over many years may have an increased risk of getting can-
cer
Some infants and young children who drink water containing chlo-
rite in excess of the MCL could experience nervous system ef-
fects Similar effects may occur in fetuses of pregnant women
who drink water containing chlorite in excess of the MCL Some
people may experience anemia
Some people who use water containing chlorine well in excess of
the MRDL could experience irritating effects to their eyes and
nose Some people who drink water containing chlorine well in
excess of the MRDL could experience stomach discomfort
Some people who use water containing chlorammes well in excess
of the MRDL could experience irritating effects to their eyes and
nose Some people who drink water containing chlorammes well
in excess of the MRDL could experience stomach discomfort or
anemia
Some infants and young children who drink water containing chlo-
rine dioxide in excess of the MRDL could experience nervous
system effects Similar effects may occur in fetuses of pregnant
women who drink water containing chlorine dioxide in excess of
the MRDL Some people may experience anemia


-Ado* for public notification only The chlorine dioxide violations re-
ported today are the result of exceedances at the treatment facil-
ity only, not within the distribution system which delivers water to
consumers Continued compliance with chlorine dioxide levels
within the distribution system minimizes the potential risk of these
violations to consumers
Some infants and young children who drink water containing chlo-
rine dioxide in excess of the MRDL could experience nervous
system effects Similar effects may occur in fetuses of pregnant
women who drink water containing chlorine dioxide in excess of
the MRDL Some people may experience anemia
Add for public notification only The chlorine dioxide violations re-
ported today include exceedances of the EPA standard within the
distribution system which delivers water to consumers Violations
of the chlorine dioxide standard within the distribution system
may harm human health based on short-term exposures Certain
groups, including fetuses, infants, and young children, may be es-
pecially susceptible to nervous system effects from excessive
chlorine dioxide exposure
Total organic carbon (TOC) has no health effects However, total
organic carbon provides a medium for the formation of disinfec-
tion byproducts These byproducts include tnhalomethanes
(THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs) Drinking water containing
these byproducts in excess of the MCL may lead to adverse
health effects, liver or kidney problems, or nervous system ef-
fects, and may lead to an increased risk of getting cancer
                                         I Other Treatment Techniques
88. Acrylamide	
                      Zero
Some people who drink water containing high levels of acrylamide
  over a long period of time could have problems with their nervous
  system or blood,  and may have an increased risk of  getting can-
                                                   551

-------
Pt. 141,Subpt. Q, App. B
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant
89. Epichtorohydrm
MCLG ' mg/L
Zero
MCL 2 mg/L
TT
Standard health effects language for public notification
Some people who drtnk water containing high levels of
epichlorohydrm over a long period of time could experience stom-
ach problems, and may have an increased risk of getting cancer
          APPENDIX B—ENDNOTES

  1.  MCLG—Maximum  contaminant  level
goal
  2. MCL—Maximum contaminant level
  3. For water systems analyzing at least 40
samples per month, no more than 5.0 percent
of the monthly samples may be positive for
total coliforms. For systems analyzing fewer
than 40 samples per month, no more than one
sample per month may be positive for total
coliforms.
  4. There are various regulations that set
turbidity standards for different types of sys-
tems, including 40 CFR 141.13,  and the 1989
Surface Water Treatment Rule,  the 1998 In-
terim Enhanced  Surface Water  Treatment
Rule and  the  2001  Long Term  1 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule. The MCL for
the montly turbidity average is 1 NTU; the
MCL for the 2-day average is 5 NTU for sys-
tems that are required to filter but have not
yet installed filtration (40 CFR 141.13).
  5. NTU—Nephelometric turbidity unit
  6. There are various regulations that set
turbidity standards for different types of sys-
tems, including 40 CFR 141.13,  and the 1989
Surface Water Treatment Rule,  the 1998 In-
terim Enhanced  Surface Water  Treatment
Rule and  the  2001  Long Term  1 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule. Systems sub-
ject to  the Surface Water Treatment Rule
(both filtered and unfiltered) may not exceed
5 NTU.  In addition, in  filtered  systems, 95
percent of samples each month must  not ex-
ceed 0.5 NTU in systems using conventional
or direct  filtration and must not exceed 1
NTU in systems using slow  sand or diatoma-
ceous earth filtration  or  other filtration
technologies approved by the primacy agen-
cy.
  7. TT—Treatment technique
  8. There are various regulations that set
turbidity standards for different types of sys-
tems, including 40 CFR 141.13, the 1989 Sur-
face Water Treatment Rule (SWTR), the 1998
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment
Rule (IESWTR) and the 2001 Long Term 1 En-
hanced  Surface   Water  Treatment  Rule
(LT1ESWTR).  For  systems subject  to the
IESWTR (systems serving at least 10,000 peo-
ple,  using surface  water or ground water
under the direct influence of surface water),
that use conventional filtration or direct fil-
tration, after January 1, 2002, the turbidity
level of a system's combined filter effluent
may not exceed 0.3 NTU in at  least 95 per-
cent of monthly measurements, and the tur-
bidity level of a system's combined filter ef-
fluent must not exceed 1 NTU  at any  time.
Systems subject to the IESWTR using tech-
nologies other  than conventional,  direct,
slow sand,  or dlatomaceous earth filtration
must meet turbidity limits set by the  pri-
macy agency. For systems subject to  the
LT1ESWTR (systems  serving  fewer  than
10,000 people, using surface water or ground
water under the direct influence of surface
water) that use conventional filtration or di-
rect filtration, after January 14, 2005 the tur-
bidity level of a system's combined filter ef-
fluent may not exceed 0.3 NTU in at least 95
percent of  monthly  measurements, and the
turbidity level of a system's combined filter
effluent must not exceed 1 NTU at any time.
Systems subject to  the LT1ESWTR using
technologies other than conventional, direct,
slow sand,  or diatomaceous earth filtration
must meet turbidity limits set by the  pri-
macy agency.
  9. The bacteria detected  by heterotrophic
plate count (HPC) are not necessarily harm-
ful. HPC is simply an alternative method of
determining disinfectant residual levels. The
number of  such bacteria is an indicator of
whether there is enough disinfectant in the
distribution system.
  10. SWTR, IESWTR, and LT1ESWTR treat-
ment technique  violations that involve  tur-
bidity  exceedances may use the health ef-
fects language for turbidity instead.
  11. These  arsenic values are effective Janu-
ary 23, 2006. Until then, the MCL is 0.05 mg/
L and there is no MCLG.
  12. Millions fibers per liter.
  13. Action Level = 0.015 mg/L
  14. Action Level = 1.3 mg/L
  15. Millirems per years
  16. The uranium MCL is effective Decem-
ber 8, 2003 for all community water systems.
  17. Picocuries per liter
  18.  Surface  water systems  and  ground
water systems under the direct influence of
surface  water are regulated under Subpart H
of 40 CFR  141.  Subpart H community  and
non-transient non-community systems serv-
ing 210,000 must comply with DBF MCLs and
disinfectant maximum residual disinfectant
levels (MRDLs) beginning  January  1, 2002.
All other community and non-transient non-
community systems must meet the MCLs
and MRDLs beginning January 1, 2004. Sub-
part H transient  non-community  systems
serving  10,000 or more persons  and using
chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant or oxidant
must comply  with  the   chlorine  dioxide
MRDL beginning January 1, 2002. Subpart H
transient  non-community  systems  serving
fewer than 10,000 persons and systems using
                                         552

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
               Pt. 141,Subpt. Q, App. C
only ground water not under the direct influ-
ence of surface water and using chlorine di-
oxide as a disinfectant or oxidant must com-
ply with the chlorine dioxide MRDL begin-
ning January 1, 2004.
  19. The MCL of 0.10 mg/1 for TTHMs is in
effect  until January  1, 2002 for Subpart H
community water systems serving 10,000 or
more. This MCL is in effect  until January 1,
2004 for community water  systems with a
population  of  10,000  or  more using  only
ground water not under the  direct influence
of surface water. After  these  deadlines, the
MCL will  be 0.080 mg/1. On  January 1, 2004,
all systems serving less  than 10,000 will have
to comply with the new MCL as well.
  20. The MCL for total trihalomethanes is
the sum of the concentrations of the  indi-
vidual trihalomethanes.
  21. The MCL for haloacetic acids is the sum
of  the concentrations   of  the  individual
haloacetic acids.
  22. MRDLG—Maximum residual disinfect-
ant level goal.
  23. MRDL—Maximum  residual disinfectant
level.
[65 PR 26043, May 4, 2000; 65 FR 38629, June 21,
2000; 65 FR 40521, 40522,  June 30,  2000,  as
amended at 65  FR 76751, Dec.  7, 2000; 66 FR
7065, Jan. 22, 2001; 66 FR  31104, June 8, 2001; 67
FR 1838, Jan.  14, 2002; 67 FR 70857, Nov.  27,
2002; 68 FR 14507, Mar. 25, 2003]
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38856, June
29, 2004, appendix B to subpart Q of part 141
was amended by revising endnotes 4 and 8,
effective July 29, 2004. For the convenience of
the user, the revised text is  set forth as fol-
lows:

APPENDIX  B  TO SUBPART  Q  OP PART
    141—STANDARD   HEALTH  EFFECTS
    LANGUAGE FOR   PUBLIC  NOTIFICA-
    TION
  4. There are various regulations that set
turbidity standards for different types of sys-
tems, including 40 CFR 141.13, and the 1989
Surface Water Treatment Rule, the 1998 In-
terim Enhanced Surface  Water Treatment
Rule and  the 2002 Long- Term 1 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule. The MCL for
the monthly turbidity average is 1 NTU; the
MCL for the 2-day  average is 5 NTU for sys-
tems that are required to filter but have not
yet installed filtration (40 CFR 141.13).
  8. There are various regulations that set
turbidity standards for different types of sys-
tems, including 40 CFR 141.13, the 1989 Sur-
face Water Treatment Rule (SWTR), the 1998
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment
Rule (IESWTR) and the 2002 Long Term 1 En-
hanced   Surface   Water  Treatment Rule
(LT1ESWTR).  For systems  subject  to  the
IESWTR (systems serving at least 10,000 peo-
ple,  using  surface water  or ground water
under the direct influence of surface  water),
that use conventional filtration or direct fil-
tration, after January 1, 2002, the turbidity
level of a system's combined filter effluent
may not exceed 0.3 NTU in  at  least  95 per-
cent of monthly measurements, and the tur-
bidity level of a system's combined filter ef-
fluent must not exceed 1 NTU  at any time.
Systems subject to the IESWTR using tech-
nologies other  than conventional,  direct,
slow sand, or diatomaceous  earth filtration
must meet turbidity limits set by the pri-
macy agency.  For systems subject  to  the
LT1ESWTR  (systems  serving  fewer than
10,000 people, using surface water or  ground
water under the direct  influence of  surface
water) that use conventional filtration or di-
rect filtration, after January 1,  2005, the tur-
bidity level of a system's combined filter ef-
fluent may not exceed 0.3 NTU in at least 95
percent  of monthly measurements, and  the
turbidity level of a system's combined filter
effluent must not exceed 1 NTU at any time.
Systems subject to  the LT1ESWTR using
technologies other  than conventional, direct,
slow sand, or diatomaceous  earth filtration
must meet turbidity limits  set by the pri-
macy agency.
APPENDIX C TO SUBPART  Q  OF PART
    141—LIST  OF  ACRONYMS  USED  IN
    PUBLIC NOTIFICATION REGULATION

CCR  Consumer Confidence Report
CWS  Community Water System
DBF  Disinfection Byproduct
EPA  Environmental Protection Agency
HPC  Heterotrophic Plate Count
IESWTR  Interim Enhanced Surface Water
   Treatment Rule
IOC  Inorganic Chemical
LCR  Lead and Copper Rule
MCL  Maximum Contaminant Level
MCLG  Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
MRDL  Maximum  Residual   Disinfectant
   Level
MRDLG  Maximum  Residual   Disinfectant
   Level Goal
NCWS Non-Community Water System
NPDWR  National Primary Drinking Water
   Regulation
NTNCWS  Non-Transient   Non-Community
   Water System
NTU  Nephelometric Turbidity Unit
OGWDW Office of Ground Water and Drink-
   ing Water
OW  Office of Water
PN Public Notification
PWS  Public Water System
                                        553

-------
§141.500
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
SDWA  Safe Drinking Water Act
SMCL  Secondary  Maximum Contaminant
   Level
SOC  Synthetic Organic Chemical
SWTR  Surface Water Treatment Rule
TCR  Total Conform Rule
TT  Treatment Technique
TWS Transient Non-Community Water Sys-
   tem
VOC  Volatile Organic Chemical

     Subparts R-S [Reserved]

Subpart   T—Enhanced   Filtration
    and      Disinfection—Systems
    Serving  Fewer  Than  10,000
    People

  SOURCE: 67 FR 1839, Jan. 14,  2002, unless
otherwise noted.

        GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

§ 141.500  General requirements.
  The  requirements  of  this  subpart
constitute national primary drinking
water  regulations. These regulations
establish  requirements  for filtration
and disinfection that are in addition to
criteria under which filtration and dis-
infection are required under subpart H
of this part.  The regulations in this
subpart establish or  extend  treatment
technique requirements in lieu of max-
imum  contaminant levels for the fol-
lowing  contaminants: Giardia lamblia,
viruses, heterotrophic plate count bac-
teria,  Legionella,  Cryptosporidium and
turbidity. The treatment technique re-
quirements consist  of installing and
properly  operating  water  treatment
processes which reliably achieve:
  (a) At least 99 percent (2 log) removal
of Cryptosporidium  between  a point
where  the  raw water is not  subject to
recontamination by surface water run-
off and a point downstream before or at
the first customer for filtered systems,
or Cryptosporidium, control  under  the
watershed  control  plan for  unfiltered
systems; and
  (b) Compliance with the profiling and
benchmark requirements  in  §§141.530
through 141.544.

§ 141.501  Who is subject to the require-
   ments of subpart T?
  You  are  subject  to these  require-
ments  if your system:
  (a) Is a public water system;
  (b) Uses surface water or GWUDI as a
source; and
  (c) Serves fewer than 10,000 persons.

§141.502  When must my system com-
   ply with these requirements?
  You must comply with these require-
ments in  this subpart beginning Janu-
ary  14, 2005  except  where  otherwise
noted.

  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38856, June
29, 2004, §141.502 was revised, effective July
29, 2004. For the convenience  of the user, the
revised text is set forth as follows:

§ 141.502  When must my system comply with
   these requirements?
  You must comply with these requirements
in this subpart beginning January 1, 2005, ex-
cept where  otherwise noted.

§ 141.503  What does subpart T require?
  There are seven requirements of this
subpart, and  you must comply with  all
requirements that are  applicable  to
your system. These requirements are:
  (a)  You must cover   any  finished
water reservoir that you began to con-
struct on  or  after March 15, 2002 as de-
scribed in §§141.510 and 141.511;
  (b) If your system is  an  unfiltered
system, you  must comply with the up-
dated watershed control  requirements
described  in §§141.520-141.522;
  (c) If your  system is a community or
non-transient  non-community water
systems you must  develop a disinfec-
tion profile  as  described in  §§141.530-
141.536;
  (d)  If  your system  is considering
making a significant  change to its dis-
infection practices, you must  develop a
disinfection  benchmark  and consult
with the  State  for  approval  of  the
change as described in §§141.540-141.544;
  (e) If your system  is a filtered sys-
tem, you  must comply with  the com-
bined filter  effluent requirements  as
described  in §§141.550-141.553;
  (f) If your system is a filtered system
that uses  conventional or direct filtra-
tion, you  must comply with  the indi-
vidual  filter  turbidity requirements as
described  in §§141.560-141.564; and
  (g) You  must comply with the appli-
cable reporting and recordkeeping  re-
quirements   as  described in  §§141.570
and 141.571.
                                     554

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.531
     FINISHED WATER RESERVOIRS

§ 141.510  Is my system subject to the
    new  finished  water  reservoir  re-
    quirements?
  All subpart H systems which serve
fewer than 10,000 are subject to this re-
quirement.

§ 141.511  What is  required of new fin-
    ished water reservoirs?
  If your system begins construction of
a finished water reservoir  on or  after
March 15, 2002  the  reservoir  must be
covered. Finished water  reservoirs  for
which your system began construction
prior to  March 15, 2002 are not subject
to this requirement.

ADDITIONAL WATERSHED  CONTROL  RE-
  QUIREMENTS  FOR  UNFILTERED  SYS-
  TEMS

§ 141.520  Is my system subject to the
    updated watershed control require-
    ments?
  If you are a subpart H system serving
fewer than 10,000  persons  which does
not  provide filtration, you must con-
tinue to comply with all of the filtra-
tion avoidance  criteria  in  §141.71, as
well as the additional watershed con-
trol requirements in §141.521.

§141.521  What   updated   watershed
    control   requirements   must  my
    unfiltered system implement to con-
    tinue to avoid filtration?
  Your  system  must take any addi-
tional steps necessary to minimize the
potential   for    contamination    by
Cryptospondium  oocysts in the source
water.  Your system's  watershed con-
trol program must, for Cryptospondium:
  (a) Identify watershed characteristics
and activities which may have an ad-
verse effect  on source water quality;
and
  (b) Monitor the occurrence of activi-
ties which may have an adverse effect
on source water quality.

§141.522  How does the State deter-
    mine  whether my  system's water-
    shed control requirements are ade-
    quate?
  During  an  onsite  inspection  con-
ducted   under   the   provisions   of
§141.71(b)(3), the State must determine
whether your watershed control pro-
gram is adequate to  limit  potential
contamination   by    Cryptosporidium
oocysts.  The adequacy of the program
must be based on  the comprehensive-
ness of the watershed review; the effec-
tiveness  of your program  to monitor
and  control detrimental  activities  oc-
curring in the watershed; and the  ex-
tent to which your system has maxi-
mized land ownership and/or controlled
land use  within the watershed.

         DISINFECTION PROFILE

§ 141.530 What is a disinfection profile
   and who must develop one?
  A  disinfection  profile is  a graphical
representation of your system's level of
Giardia  lamblia  or virus  inactivation
measured during the course of a year.
If you are a subpart H community  or
non-transient  non-community   water
systems  which serves fewer than 10,000
persons,  your system must develop a
disinfection profile unless  your State
determines that  your system's profile
is unnecessary. Your  State  may ap-
prove the use of a more representative
data set  for disinfection profiling than
the data set required under  §§141.532-
141.536.

  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38856, June
29, 2004, §141.530 was amended in the second
sentence, by revising "water systems" to read
"water system", effective July 29, 2004.

§141.531  What  criteria must  a State
   use  to  determine that a profile  is
   unnecessary?
  States  may only determine  that a
system's profile is unnecessary if a sys-
tem's TTHM and HAAS levels are below
0.064 mg-/L and 0.048 mg/L, respectively.
To determine these levels, TTHM and
HAA5 samples must be collected after
January  1, 1998, during the month with
the warmest water temperature, and  at
the point of  maximum residence time
in your distribution system.
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38856, June
29, 2004. §141.531 was amended by adding a
sentence to the end of the section, effective
July  29,  2004.  For the convenience  of  the
user,  the added text is set forth as follows:

§141.531   What criteria must a State use to
   determine that a profile is unnecessary?
  * *  * Your State may approve a more rep-
resentative TTHM and HAAS data set to de-
termine these levels.
                                     555

-------
§141.532
                                40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 141.532  How does my system develop
    a  disinfection  profile  and  when
    must it begin?
  A  disinfection  profile  consists  of
three steps:
  (a) First, your system  must collect
data for several parameters from  the
plant as  discussed in §141.533 over  the
course  of  12  months. If  your system
serves  between  500  and  9,999  persons
you must begin to collect data no later
than July 1, 2003. If your system  serves
fewer than 500 persons you must begin
to collect data no later than January 1,
2004.
  (b) Second,  your  system  must  use
this data to calculate weekly log inac-
tivation  as discussed in  §§141.534  and
141.535; and
  (c) Third,   your  system   must   use
these weekly log inactivations  to  de-
velop a disinfection profile as specified
in §141.536.
                     § 141.533  What data must  my system
                         collect to  calculate a disinfection
                         profile?
                       Your  system must monitor the  fol-
                     lowing  parameters  to  determine  the
                     total log inactivation using the analyt-
                     ical methods  in  §141.74 (a),  once  per
                     week on the  same calendar day, over 12
                     consecutive months:
                       (a)  The  temperature  of  the   dis-
                     infected water at  each  residual  dis-
                     infectant  concentration sampling point
                     during peak hourly flow;
                       (b) If your system uses  chlorine,  the
                     pH of the disinfected water at each re-
                     sidual  disinfectant  concentration sam-
                     pling point during peak hourly flow;
                       (c) The disinfectant  contact time(s)
                     ("T") during peak  hourly flow; and
                       (d)  The residual disinfectant  con-
                     centration(s) ("C") of the  water before
                     or  at  the  first customer  and prior to
                     each additional  point  of disinfection
                     during peak hourly flow.
§ 141.534   How does my system use this data to calculate an inactivation ratio?
  Calculate the total inactivation ratio as follows, and multiply the value by 3.0
to determine log inactivation of Giardia lamblia:
    If your system *
(a) Uses only one point of dis-
  infectant application
(b) Uses more than one point
  of disinfectant application be-
  fore the first customer
                                          Your system must determine *
(1) One inactivation ratio (CTcalc/CTwg) before or at the first customer during peak hourly flow
   or
(2) Successive CTcalc/CT999 values, representing sequential inactivation ratios, between the
  point of disinfectant application and a point before or at the first customer during peak hourly
  flow Under this alternative, your system must calculate the total inactivation ratio by deter-
  mining (CTcalc/CT
-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §141.544
§141.536  My system has  developed an
    inactivation ratio; what must we do
    now?
  Each log1  inactivation   serves  as a
data point in your disinfection profile.
Your  system  will  have   obtained  52
measurements (one for every  week  of
the year). This will allow your system
and the State the opportunity to  evalu-
ate how microbial inactivation  varied
over the course of the year by looking
at all  52 measurements (your Disinfec-
tion Profile). Your system must  retain
the Disinfection Profile data in graphic
form,  such  as a spreadsheet,  which
must  be  available  for review by the
State  as part  of a  sanitary survey.
Your system must use this data to cal-
culate a benchmark if you are consid-
ering changes to disinfection practices.

       DISINFECTION BENCHMARK

§ 141.540  Who  has  to  develop  a dis-
    infection benchmark?
  If you  are  a subpart H system  re-
quired to develop a disinfection profile
under  §§141.530 through  141.536, your
system  must  develop a  Disinfection
Benchmark if you  decide to  make a
significant change to your disinfection
practice.  Your system  must consult
with the State for approval before you
can implement a significant disinfec-
tion practice change.

§ 141.541  What are  significant changes
    to disinfection practice?
  Significant changes  to disinfection
practice include:
  (a) Changes to  the point of disinfec-
tion;
  (b)  Changes  to the  disinfectant(s)
used in the treatment plant;
  (c) Changes to the disinfection proc-
ess; or
  (d) Any other modification identified
by the State.

§ 141.542  What must my  system do if
    we  are considering  a significant
    change to  disinfection practices?
  If your system is  considering a sig-
nificant   change  to  its  disinfection
practice, your system must calculate a
disinfection benchmark(s) as described
in §§141.543 and 141.544 and provide the
benchmark(s) to your State. Your sys-
tem may only make a  significant dis-
infection practice  change after  con-
sulting with  the State  for approval.
Your  system  must  submit  the  fol-
lowing information to the State as part
of the consultation and approval proc-
ess:
  (a)  A  description  of  the  proposed
change;
  (b)   The   disinfection   profile   for
Giardia lamblia (and, if necessary,  vi-
ruses) and disinfection benchmark;
  (c) An analysis of how  the proposed
change will affect the current levels of
disinfection; and
  (d)  Any additional information  re-
quested by the State.

§ 141.543  How   is   the   disinfection
    benchmark calculated?
  If your system is  making a  signifi-
cant  change  to its  disinfection prac-
tice,  it must  calculate a disinfection
benchmark  using the procedure speci-
fied in the following table.
              To calculate a disinfection benchmark your system must perform the following steps

Step 1 Using the data your system collected to develop the Disinfection Profile, determine the average Giardia lamblia inactiva-
  tion for each calendar month by dividing the sum of all Giardia lamblia inactivations for that month by the number of values
  calculated for that month
Step 2 Determine the lowest monthly average value out of the twelve values  This value becomes the disinfection benchmark
§141.544  What  if  my   system  uses
    chloramines, ozone, or chlorine di-
    oxide for primary disinfection?

  If your   system  uses  chloramines,
ozone  or chlorine dioxide for  primary
disinfection your  system  must  cal-
culate   the  disinfection  benchmark
from the data your  system  collected
for viruses  to  develop the disinfection
profile  in  addition  to  the   Giardia
lamblia  disinfection  benchmark  cal-
culated  under  §141.543.  This  viral
benchmark must be calculated in the
same manner used to  calculate the
Giardia  lamblia disinfection benchmark
in §141.543.
                                      557

-------
§141.550
                         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
      COMBINED FILTER EFFLUENT
            REQUIREMENTS

§ 141.550  Is  my  system  required  to
    meet  subpart T combined filter  ef-
    fluent turbidity limits?
  All subpart H  systems which serve
populations fewer than  10,000. are re-
quired to filter,  and utilize  filtration
other than slow sand filtration  or dia-
tomaceous earth filtration must meet
the  combined filter effluent turbidity
requirements  of §§141.551-141.553  .  If
your system  uses slow  sand or diato-
maceous  earth filtration you are not
required  to meet the combined filter
effluent  turbidity limits of subpart T,
but  you  must continue to  meet  the
combined filter effluent turbidity lim-
its in §141.73.

§141.551  What strengthened  combined
    filter  effluent turbidity limits must
    my system meet?
  Your    system   must   meet  two
strengthened  combined  filter effluent
turbidity limits.
  (a) The first combined filter effluent
turbidity  limit  is a "95th percentile"
turbidity limit that your system must
meet in  at least  95 percent of the tur-
bidity   measurements   taken   each
month. Measurements must continue
to be taken  as  described in  §141.74(a)
and  (c).  Monthly reporting  must  be
completed  according  to §141.570.  The
following  table describes the required
limits  for  specific   filtration   tech-
nologies.
               table describes the required limits for
               specific filtration technologies.
   If your system consists of * * *
(1) Conventional Filtration or Direct Fil-
  tration.
(2) All other "Alternative" Filtration
  Your 95th per-
  centile turbidity
  value is * * *
03 NTU

A value determined
 by the State (no
 to exceed 1
 NTU) based on
 the demonstra-
 tion described in
 §141 552
  (b) The second combined filter efflu-
ent turbidity limit is a "maximum" tur-
bidity limit which your system may at
no  time exceed  during  the  month.
Measurements  must continue  to  be
taken  as described in §141.74(a) and (c).
Monthly reporting:  must  be completed
according  to  §141.570.  The  following
                  If your system consists of * * *
               (1) Conventional Filtration or Direct Fil-
                 tration
               (2) All other "Alternative"
                           Your maximum tur-
                           bidity value is * * *
                           1 NTU

                           A value determined
                            by the State (not
                            to exceed 5
                            NTU) based on
                            the demonstra-
                            tion as described
                            .n§141 552
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE  At 69 PR 38856, June
29, 2004, §141.551 was amended  in paragraph
(a)(2)  by removing "no" and adding  in  its
place "not", and in paragraph (b)(2) by remov-
ing "Alternative" and adding in its place "Al-
ternative Filtration", effective  July 29, 2004.

§ 141.552  My system  consists of "alter-
    native filtration" and  is required to
    conduct  a demonstration—what is
    required  of  my  system  and  how
    does  the State  establish  my tur-
    bidity limits?

  (a)  If your system  consists of alter-
native  filtration(filtration  other than
slow   sand  filtration,   diatomaceous
earth  filtration,  conventional  filtra-
tion,  or direct  filtration) you  are re-
quired to conduct a demonstration (see
tables in §141.551). Your system  must
demonstrate to  the  State,  using pilot
plant studies or other means, that your
system's  filtration,   in  combination
with  disinfection  treatment, consist-
ently achieves:
  (1)    99    percent   removal    of
Cryptosporidium oocysts;
  (2) 99.9  percent removal and/or inac-
tivation of Giardia lamblia cysts; and
  (3) 99.99 percent removal and/or inac-
tivation of viruses.
  (b) [Reserved]

§ 141.553  My  system  practices   lime
    softening—is there any special pro-
    vision regarding my combined filter
    effluent?

  If your system  practices  lime soft-
ening, you may  acidify representative
combined filter effluent turbidity sam-
ples prior to analysis using a protocol
approved by  the State.
                                       558

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                 §141.563
      INDIVIDUAL FILTER TURBIDITY
              REQUIREMENTS

§141.560  Is my system subject to indi-
    vidual   filter   turbidity   require-
    ments?
  If your system is a subpart H system
serving  fewer  than  10,000 people  and
utilizing conventional filtration  or di-
rect  filtration,  you  must conduct con-
tinuous  monitoring  of  turbidity   for
each individual filter  at your system.
The  following  requirements  apply to
continuous turbidity monitoring:
  (a)  Monitoring  must be conducted
using an approved method in § 141.74(a);
  (b) Calibration of turbidimeters must
be  conducted using  procedures   speci-
fied by the manufacturer;
  (c) Results  of  turbidity monitoring
must be  recorded at least every 15 min-
utes;
  (d) Monthly reporting must be com-
pleted according to §141.570; and
  (e) Records  must  be  maintained  ac-
cording to §141.571.

§ 141.561  What  happens if my system's
    turbidity  monitoring   equipment
    fails?
  If there is a failure in the continuous
turbidity monitoring equipment, your
system   must  conduct  grab  sampling
every four hours  in lieu of continuous
monitoring  until  the  turbidimeter  is
back on-line. Your system has 14 days
to  resume  continuous  monitoring   be-
fore a violation  is incurred.

§ 141.562  My  system  only  has two or
    fewer  filters—is  there  any  special
    provision  regarding individual  fil-
    ter turbidity monitoring?
  Yes, if your system  only consists of
two or fewer filters, you may conduct
continuous monitoring of combined  fil-
ter  effluent turbidity  in  lieu of indi-
vidual filter effluent  turbidity  moni-
toring.   Continuous  monitoring  must
meet the same  requirements  set forth
in §141.560(a) through (d) and §141.561.

§141.563  What  follow-up action is  my
    system required  to take based  on
    continuous turbidity monitoring?
  Follow-up action is required accord-
ing to the following tables:
(a) The turbidity of
  an individual filter
  (or the turbidity of
  combined filter ef-
  fluent (CFE) for
  systems with 2 fil-
  ters that monitor
  CFE in lieu of in-
  dividual filters)
  exceeds 1 0 NTU
  in two consecu-
  tive recordings 15
  minutes apart
                     Your system must *
Report to the State by the 10th of the
  following month and include the filter
  number(s),  corresponding  date(s),
  turbidity value(s) which exceeded 1 0
  NTU, and the cause (if known) for
  the exceedance(s)
 If a system was re-
 quired to report to
  the State * ' *
(b) For three
  months in a row
  and turbidity ex-
  ceeded 1 0 NTU
  in two consecu-
  tive recordings 15
  minutes apart at
  the same filter (or
  CFE for systems
  with 2 filters that
  monitor CFE in
  lieu of individual
  filters)
(c) For two months
  in a row and tur-
  bidity exceeded
  2 0 BTU in 2 con-
  secutive record-
  ings 15 minutes
  apart at the same
  filter (or CFE for
  systems with 2 fil-
  ters that monitor
  CFE in lieu of in-
  dividual filters)
     Your system must
Conduct a self-assessment of the fil-
  ter(s) within 14 days of the day the
  filter exceeded 1.0 NTU  in two con-
  secutive measurements for the third
  straight month  unless a CPE as
  specified in paragraph (c) of this sec-
  tion was required Systems with 2 fil-
  ters that monitor CFE in  lieu of indi-
  vidual filters must conduct a self as-
  sessment on both filters The self-as-
  sessment must consist of at least the
  following components  assessment
  of filter performance, development of
  a  filter  profile,  identification  and
  pnontization of factors limiting filter
  performance, assessment of the ap-
  plicability of corrections,  and prepa-
  ration of a filter self-assessment re-
  port If a self-assessment is required,
  the date that it was triggered and the
  date that it was completed
Arrange to have a comprehensive per-
  formance  evaluation (CPE)  con-
  ducted by the State or a third party
  approved by the State not later than
  60 days following the day the filter
  exceeded 20 NTU in two consecu-
  tive measurements for the second
  straight month If a CPE has been
  completed by the State or  a  third
  party  approved by the State within
  the 12 prior months or  the system
  and State are jointly participating in
  an ongoing Comprehensive Tech-
  nical Assistance (CTA) project at the
  system, a new CPE is not required
  If conducted, a CPE must be com-
  pleted and submitted to the State no
  later than 120 days following the day
  the filter exceeded 2 0 NTU in two
  consecutive  measurements for the
  second straight month
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38856, June
29, 2004, §141.563 was amended in  paragraph
(b) by removing the last sentence in the sec-
ond column of the table, and in paragraph (c)
by removing- "BTU" and adding in its place
"NTU" in the first column of the table, effec-
tive July 29, 2004.
                                           559

-------
§141.564
                                       40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 141.564  My   system  practices  lime
    softening—is there any  special pro-
    vision  regarding my individual fil-
    ter turbidity monitoring?
  If  your  system   utilizes  lime  soft-
ening, you may apply to  the  State for
alternative turbidity exceedance levels
for the  levels specified  in the table in
§141.563.  You  must be able  to  dem-
onstrate to  the  State that higher tur-
bidity levels are due to lime carryover
only,  and not  due to degraded  filter
performance.
                               REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING
                                         REQUIREMENTS

                           § 141.570  What  does subpart T require
                               that my system report to  the State?
                             This subpart T requires your system
                           to report several  items  to  the  State.
                           The following table  describes the items
                           which  must  be  reported  and  the  fre-
                           quency of reporting. Your system is re-
                           quired  to  report the  information  de-
                           scribed in  the following  table,  if  it is
                           subject  to  the  specific  requirement
                           shown in the  first column.
     Corresponding
      requirement
       Description of information to report
                                                      Frequency
(a) Combined Filter Effluent
  Requirements
(§§141 550-141553)
(b) Individual Turbidity Re-
  quirements.
(§§141 560-141 564)
(c) Disinfection Profiling
(§§141.530-141 536)
(d) Disinfection
  Benchmarking.
(§§141 540-141 544)
(1) The total number of filtered water turbidity meas-
  urements taken during the month

(2) The number and  percentage of filtered water tur-
  bidity measurements taken during the month which
  are less than or equal to your system's  required
  95th percentile limit.
(3) The date and value of any turbidity measurements
  taken during the month which exceed the maximum
  turbidity value for your filtration system
(1) That your system conducted individual filter tur-
  bidity monitoring dunng the month

(2) The filter number(s), corresponding date(s), and
  the turbidity value(s) which exceeded 1 0 NTU dur-
  ing the  month,  but only if 2 consecutive measure-
  ments exceeded 1 0 NTU
(3) If a self-assessment is  required, the date that it
  was triggered and the date that it was completed
(4) If a CPE is required, that the CPE is required and
  the date that it was triggered
(5) Copy of completed CPE report....     ...

(1) Results of optional monitoring which show TTHM
  levels <0064 mg/l and HAAS levels <0.048 mg/l
  (Only if your system wishes to forgo profiling) or that
  your system has begun disinfection profiling
(1) A descnption  of the proposed change  in disinfec-
  tion, your system's  disinfection profile  for Giardia
  lambda (and, if necessary, viruses) and  disinfection
  benchmark, and an  analysis of how the proposed
  change will affect the current levels of disinfection.
By the 10th of the following month.


By the 10th of the following month.



By the 10th of the following month.


By the 10th of the following month.


By the 10th of the following month.
By the 10th of the following month (or 14
  days after the self-assessment  was
  triggered only if the  self-assessment
  was tnggered during the last four days
  of the month)
By the 10th of the following month.

Within 120 days after the CPE was trig-
  gered
(i) For systems serving 500-9,999 by
  July 1,2003,
(11) For systems serving fewer than 500
  by January 1, 2004
Anytime your  system is considenng a
  significant change to  its disinfection
  practice.
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38857, June 29, 2004, §141.570 was amended by revising para-
graph (b)(2) in the table,  effective July 29, 2004. For the convenience of the user, the revised
text is set forth as follows:

§ 141.570  What does subpart T require that my system report to the State?
     Corresponding
      requirement
        Description of information to report
                                                      Frequency
                                              560

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                 Pt. 142
Corresponding
requirement
(b) Individual Filter Turbidity
Requirements
(§§141 560-141 564)
Description of information to report
(2) The filter number(s), corresponding date(s). and
the turbidity value(s) which exceeded 1 0 NTU dur-
ing the month, and the cause (if known) for the ex-
ceedance(s), but only if 2 consecutive measure-
ments exceeded 1 0 NTU
Frequency
By the 10th of the following month
§ 141.571  What records does subpart T require my system to keep?
  Your system must keep several types of records based on  the requirements of
subpart T, in addition to recordkeeping requirements under §141.75. The following-
table describes the necessary records, the length of time  these records  must be
kept, and for which requirement the records pertain. Your system is required to
maintain records described in this table,  if it is subject to the specific require-
ment shown in the first column.
Corresponding requirement
(a) Individual Filter Turbidity Requirements
(§§141 560-141 564)
(b) Disinfection Profiling
(§§141 530-141 536)
(c) Disinfection Benchmarking
(§§141 540-141 544)
Description of necessary records
Results of individual filter monitoring
Results of Profile (including raw data and analysis)
Benchmark (including raw data and analysis)
Duration of
time records
must be kept
At least 3
years
Indefinitely
Indefinitely
PART   142—NATIONAL    PRIMARY
   DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS
   IMPLEMENTATION

      Subpart A—General Provisions

Sec.
142.1  Applicability.
142.2  Definitions.
142.3  Scope.
142.4  State and local authority.

     Subpart B—Primary Enforcement
              Responsibility

142.10 Requirements for a determination of
    primary enforcement responsibility.
142.11 Initial determination of primary en-
    forcement responsibility.
142.12 Revision of State programs.
142.13 Public hearing.
142 14 Records kept  by States.
142.15 Reports by States.
142.16 Special primacy requirements.
142.17 Review of State programs and proce-
    dures for withdrawal of approved pri-
    macy programs.
142.18 EPA review of State monitoring- de-
    terminations.
142.19 EPA review of State implementation
    of national primary drinking water regu-
    lations for lead and copper.
    Subpart C—Review of State-Issued
        Variances and Exemptions

142.20 State-issued  variances  and exemp-
   tions under Section 1415(a) and Section
   1416 of the Act.
142.21 State consideration of a variance  or
   exemption request.
142.22 Review  of State  variances, exemp-
   tions and schedules.
142.23 Notice to State.
142.24 Administrator's rescission.

     Subpart D—Federal Enforcement

142.30 Failure by State  to  assure  enforce-
   ment.
142.31 [Reserved]
142.32 Petition for public hearing.
142.33 Public hearing.
142.34 Entry and inspection of public water
   systems.

Subpart E—Variances Issued by the  Ad-
    ministrator  Under Section  1415(a)  of
    the Act

142.40 Requirements for a variance.
142.41 Variance request.
142.42 Consideration of a variance request.
142.43 Disposition of a variance request.
142.44 Public  hearings  on  variances  and
   schedules.
142.45 Action after hearing.
142.46 Alternative treatment techniques.
                                       561

-------
§142.1
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
   Subpart F—Exemptions Issued by the
              Administrator

142.50  Requirements for an exemption.
142.51  Exemption request.
142.52  Consideration of  an  exemption  re-
   quest.
142.53  Disposition of an exemption request.
142.54  Public hearings  on exemption sched-
   ules.
142.55  Final schedule.
142.56  Extension of date for compliance.
142.57  Bottled  water,   point-of-use,  and
   point-of-entry devices.

Subpart  G—Identification of  Best* Tech-.
    nology, TreatmenMechnlques or Other
    Means Generally Available

142.60  Variances  from  the maximum con-
   taminant      level      for      total
   trihalomethanes.
142.61  Variances  from  the maximum con-
   taminant level for fluoride.
142.62  Variances  and exemptions from the
   maximum contaminant levels for organic
   and inorganic chemicals.
142.63  Variances  and exemptions from the
   maximum  contaminant level  for total
   coliforms.
142.64  Variances  and exemptions from the
   requirements of part 141, subpart H—Fil-
   tration and Disinfection.
142.65  Variances  and exemptions from the
   maximum contaminant levels for radio-
   nuclides.

         Subpart H—Indian Tribes

142.72  Requirements for Tribal .eligibility.
142.76  Request by an Indian Tribe  for a  de-
   termination of eligibility.
142.78  Procedure  for processing an  Indian
   Tribe's application.

Subpart I—Administrator's Review of State
    Decisions   that  Implement   Criteria
    Under Which  Filtration Is Required

142.80  Review procedures.
142.81  Notice to the State.

           Subpart J [Reserved]

  Subpart K—Variances for Small System

           GENERAL PROVISIONS

142.301 What is a small system variance?
142.302 Who can issue a  small system vari-
   ance?
142.303 Which size public water systems can
   receive a small system variance?
142.304 For which of the  regulatory require-
   ments is a small system variance avail-
   able?
142.305 When can  a  small system  variance
   be granted by a State?
    REVIEW OF SMALL SYSTEM VARIANCE
               APPLICATION

142.306 What are the responsibilities of the
   public water system,  State and the Ad-
   ministrator in ensuring that sufficient
   information is available and  for evalua-
   tion of a small system variance applica-
   tion?
142.307 What terms and conditions must be
   included in a small system variance?

           PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

142.308 What public notice is required before
   a State or the Administrator proposes to
   issue a small system variance?
142.309 What are the public meeting require-
   ments associated with the proposal of a
   small system variance?
142.310 How can a person served by the pub-
   lic water system obtain EPA  review of a
   State proposed small system variance?

   EPA REVIEW AND APPROVAL OP SMALL
            SYSTEM VARIANCES

142.311 What procedures  allow for the Ad-
   ministrator to object to a proposed small
   system variance or overturn a granted
   small system variance for a public  water
   system serving 3,300 or fewer persons?
142.312 What EPA action is necessary when
   a State proposes to grant a small system
   variance to a public water system serv-
   ing a population of more  than 3,300 and
   fewer than 10,000 persons?
142.313 How will the Administrator review a
   State's program  under this subpart?

  AUTHORITY: 42 U.S.C. 300f,  300g-l, 300g-2,
300g-3, 300g-4, 300g-5, 300g-6, 300J-1,  300J-9,
and SOOj-11.

  SOURCE:  41  FR  2918,  Jan. 20,  1976,  unless
otherwise  noted.


  Subpart A—General Provisions

§ 142.1  Applicability.

  This part  sets forth,  pursuant to sec-
tions 1413 through 1416, 1445, and 1450 of
the  Public  Health  Service  Act,  as
amended by the  Safe  Drinking Water
Act, Public Law 93-523, regulations for
the  implementation and  enforcement
of the national primary drinking water
regulations  contained  in  part  141 of
this chapter.

§ 142.2  Definitions.

  As  used in  this part, and  except as
otherwise specifically provided:
  Act means the Public Health Service
Act.
                                        562

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.2
  Administrator  means  the  Adminis-
trator of the United  States Environ-
mental Protection Agency or  his au-
thorized representative.
  Agency means the United States En-
vironmental Protection Agency.
  Approved State primacy program con-
sists of those program elements listed
in §142.11(a) that were submitted with
the initial State application  for  pri-
mary  enforcement authority  and ap-
proved by the EPA Administrator and
all State program revisions thereafter
that were approved by the EPA Admin-
istrator.
  Contaminant  means  any  physical,
chemical,  biological,  or  radiological
substance or matter in water.
  Federal  agency  means any  depart-
ment,  agency, or  instrumentality of
the United States.
  Indian Tribe means any Indian Tribe
having a  Federally  recognized  gov-
erning body  carrying out substantial
governmental duties and powers over a
defined area.
  Interstate Agency means an agency of
two or more States established  by or
under  an agreement  or  compact ap-
proved by  the  Congress,  or any other
agency of two or more States or Indian
Tribes having substantial powers or du-
ties pertaining to the  control of pollu-
tion as determined and approved by the
Administrator.
  Maximum contaminant level means the
maximum  permissible level  of a con-
taminant in water which is delivered to
the free flowing outlet of the ultimate
user of a public water system; except in
the case of turbidity  where the max-
imum  permissible level is measured at
the point of  entry to  the distribution
system.  Contaminants  added  to  the
water  under  circumstances controlled
by the user, except for those resulting
from corrosion of piping and plumbing
caused by  water quality are excluded
from this definition.
  Municipality means a city, town, or
other public body created by or pursu-
ant to State law, or  an Indian Tribe
which  does not meet the requirements
of subpart H of this part.
  National primary drinking water regu-
lation  means any  primary drinking
water regulation contained in  part 141
of this chapter.
  Person means an individual; corpora-
tion;  company;  association;  partner-
ship; municipality; or State, federal, or
Tribal agency.
  Primary   enforcement   responsibility
means the primary responsibility for
administration and enforcement of pri-
mary drinking water  regulations and
related requirements applicable to pub-
lic water systems within a State.
  Public water system or PWS means a
system  for the provision to the public
of  water  for  human  consumption
through pipes or, after August 5,  1998,
other constructed conveyances, if such
system has at least fifteen service con-
nections or regularly serves an average
of  at  least  twenty-five  individuals
daily at least 60  days  out  of the year.
Such term includes:
  Any collection, treatment, storage,
and  distribution  facilities under  con-
trol of the operator of  such system and
used primarily in connection with such
system;   and   any   collection   or
pretreatment  storage   facilities  not
under such control which are used pri-
marily in connection with such system.
Such term does not include  any "spe-
cial irrigation district." A public water
system  is either a "community water
system"  or a  "noncommunity  water
system" as defined in §141.2.
  Sanitary survey means an onsite re-
view  of  the  water  source,  facilities,
equipment, operation and maintenance
of a public water system for the pur-
pose of evaluating the adequacy of such
source, facilities, equipment, operation
and maintenance  for producing and dis-
tributing safe drinking water.
  Service connection, as used in the defi-
nition of public water  system,  does not
include a connection to a system that
delivers  water by a constructed  con-
veyance other than a pipe if:
  (1) The water is used exclusively for
purposes other  than  residential  uses
(consisting of drinking, bathing, and
cooking, or other similar uses);
  (2) The Administrator or the  State
exercising  primary enforcement  re-
sponsibility for public  water systems,
determines that  alternative water  to
achieve the equivalent level of public
health protection provided by the ap-
plicable  national  primary   drinking
                                    563

-------
§142.3
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
water  regulation  is provided for resi-
dential or similar uses for drinking and
cooking; or
  (3) The Administrator or the State
exercising   primary  enforcement  re-
sponsibility for public water systems,
determines that the water provided for
residential or similar uses for drinking,
cooking, and bathing is centrally treat-
ed or treated at the point  of entry by
the provider, a pass-through entity, or
the user to achieve the equivalent level
of protection provided by the  applica-
ble national primary  drinking water
regulations.
  Special irrigation district means an ir-
rigation district in existence prior to
May 18, 1994 that provides primarily
agricultural  service  through  a piped
water system with only incidental resi-
dential or similar use where the system
or the residential or  similar users of
the system comply with the exclusion
provisions  in section 1401(4)(B)(i)(II) or
(III).
  State means one of the States of the
United  States,  the District of  Colum-
bia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,
the Virgin Islands,  Guam, American
Samoa,  the  Commonwealth   of  the
Northern Mariana Islands, the Trust
Territory of the Pacific Islands, or an
eligible Indian tribe.
  State primary drinking water regulation
means a drinking water regulation of a
State  which is comparable to a na-
tional  primary drinking water  regula-
tion.
  State program revision means a change
in an approved State primacy program.
  Supplier  of water means  any person
who owns  or operates a public water
system.
  Treatment   technique    requirement
means a requirement  of' the national
primary drinking  water  regulations
which  specifies for a  contaminant a
specific treatment technique(s) known
to the Administrator which leads to a
reduction in the level of such contami-
nant sufficient to comply with the re-
quirements of part 141  of this chapter.

[41 PR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 53
PR 37410, Sept. 26, 1988; 54 PR 52137, Dec. 20,
1989; 59 PR 64344,  Dec. 14, 1994; 63 PR 23367;
Apr. 28, 1998]
§ 142.3  Scope.
  (a) Except where otherwise provided,
this part applies to each public water
system in each State; except that this
part shall not apply to a public water
system which  meets  all  of the fol-
lowing conditions:
  (1) Which consists  only of distribu-
tion and storage facilities  (.and does
not have  any collection and treatment
facilities);
  (2) Which  obtains  all  of its  water
from, but is not owned or. operated by,
a public water system to which such
regulations apply;
  (3) Which does  not sell  water to any
person; and
  (4) Which is not a carrier which con-
veys  passengers  in   interstate  com-
merce.
  (b) In order to qualify for primary en-
forcement responsibility, a State's pro-
gram  for  enforcement  of primary
drinking water regulations must apply
to all other public water systems in the
State,  except for:
  (1) Public water systems  on carriers
which  convey passengers in interstate
commerce;
  (2) Public water systems  on Indian
land with respect to  which the State
does not  have  the necessary jurisdic-
tion or its jurisdiction is in question;
or
  (c) Section 1451 of the SDWA author-
izes the Administrator to delegate pri-
mary  enforcement  responsibility for
public  water systems to Indian  Tribes.
An Indian Tribe  must meet  the  statu-
tory criteria at  42 U.S.C. 300j-ll(b)(l)
before it is eligible to apply for Public
Water  System  Supervision  grants and
primary  enforcement responsibility.
All primary enforcement responsibility
requirements of parts  141 and 142 apply
to Indian Tribes except  where specifi-
cally noted.
[41 PR  2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 53
PR 37410, Sept. 26, 1988; 59 PR 64344, Deo. 14,
1994; 67 PR 70858, Nov. 27, 2002]

§ 142.4  State and local authority.
  Nothing in this part shall diminish
any authority  of a State or political
subdivision to adopt or enforce any law
or   regulation   respecting   drinking
water regulations or public  water sys-
tems,  but no such law  or  regulation
                                     564

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.10
shall relieve any person of any require-
ments  otherwise applicable under this
part.

 Subpart B—Primary Enforcement
           Responsibility

§ 142.10 Requirements for a determina-
    tion  of primary enforcement re-
    sponsibility.
  A State has primary enforcement re-
sponsibility for public water systems in
the State during any period for which
the Administrator  determines, based
upon a submission  made pursuant  to
§142.11, and submission  under §142.12,
that such  State,  pursuant  to  appro-
priate State legal authority:
  (a) Has adopted drinking water regu-
lations which  are  no  less stringent
than  the national  primary  drinking
water  regulations (NPDWRs) in effect
under part 141 of this chapter;
  (b) Has adopted and is implementing
adequate  procedures for  the enforce-
ment  of such State regulations,  such
procedures to include:
  (1) Maintenance of an  inventory  of
public  water systems.
  (2) A systematic  program for  con-
ducting  sanitary  surveys   of  public
water systems  in the State, with pri-
ority given to sanitary surveys of pub-
lic  water systems not in compliance
with State primary drinking water reg-
ulations.
  (3)(i) The establishment and mainte-
nance  of a State program for the cer-
tification of laboratories  conducting
analytical  measurements of drinking
water  contaminants pursuant to the
requirements  of the  State  primary
drinking water regulations including
the designation by the State of a lab-
oratory officer, or officers, certified by
the Administrator, as the official(s) re-
sponsible  for the State's certification
program.  The  requirements of  this
paragraph may be waived by the Ad-
ministrator for any State where all an-
alytical measurements required by the
State's primary drinking water regula-
tions are conducted  at laboratories op-
erated by the State and certified by the
Agency. Until such time as the Agency
establishes a National quality assur-
ance program  for laboratory certifi-
cation  the  State shall maintain an in-
terim program for the  purpose of ap-
proving those laboratories from which
the required analytical measurements
will be acceptable.
  (ii)  Upon a  showing by an  Indian
Tribe of an intergovernmental or other
agreement to have all analytical tests
performed  by  a  certified laboratory,
the Administrator  may waive this re-
quirement.
  (4) Assurance of the availability  to
the State of laboratory facilities cer-
tified by the Administrator and capa-
ble of performing analytical measure-
ments of all contaminants specified in
the State primary drinking water regu-
lations. Until such time as the Agency
establishes  a  National quality assur-
ance  program  for  laboratory  certifi-
cation the Administrator will approve
such State laboratories on an interim
basis.
  (5)  The establishment  and mainte-
nance of an activity to assure that the
design and construction of new or sub-
stantially modified public water sys-
tem facilities will be capable of compli-
ance with the  State primary drinking
water regulations.
  (6) Statutory or  regulatory enforce-
ment authority  adequate to  compel
compliance  with  the  State  primary
drinking water regulations in  appro-
priate cases, such authority to include:
  (i) Authority to apply State primary
drinking water regulations to all pub-
lic water systems in the State covered
by  the  national  primary  drinking
water regulations, except for interstate
carrier conveyances and systems on In-
dian land with respect to which, the
State does not have the necessary ju-
risdiction or its jurisdiction is in ques-
tion.
  (ii)  Authority  to sue in courts  of
competent jurisdiction to enjoin any
threatened or  continuing  violation  of
the State primary drinking water regu-
lations.
  (iii) Right of entry and inspection of
public water  systems, including the
right to take water samples, whether
or not the State has evidence that the
system is in violation of an applicable
legal requirement.
  (iv) Authority to require suppliers of
water to keep appropriate records and
make appropriate reports to the State.
  (v) Authority to require public water
systems to give public  notice that is no
                                    565

-------
§142.11
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
less  stringent  than the EPA require-
ments in Subpart Q of Part 141 of this
chapter and §142.16(a).
  (vi)  Authority  to  assess civil or
criminal penalties for violation  of the
State's primary drinking water regula-
tions and public  notification require-
ments, including  the  authority  to as-
sess  daily  penalties  or  multiple  pen-
alties when a violation continues;
  (vii) Authority to require community
water  systems to  provide consumer
confidence reports as required under 40
CFR part 141, subpart O.
  (c) Has established and will maintain
record keeping and reporting of its ac-
tivities under  paragraphs  (a), (b) and
(d)  in compliance  with  §§142.14  and
142.15;
  (d) Variances and exemptions. (1)  If it
permits small system variances pursu-
ant  to  Section 1415(e) of the Act, it
must provide procedures no less strin-
gent than  the Act  and Subpart K of
this part.
  (2) If it permits variances (other than
small system variances)  or exemptions,
or both, from the requirements  of the
State primary drinking water regula-
tions, it shall  do so under  conditions
and in a manner no less  stringent than
the requirements  of Sections 1415 and
1416  of the Act.  In granting  these
variances,  the State  must  adopt the
Administrator's findings of best avail-
able technology, treatment techniques,
or other means available as specified in
Subpart G  of  this part. (States with
primary   enforcement  responsibility
may adopt  procedures  different  from
those set forth in Subparts E and  F of
this  part, which apply to  the issuance
of variances (other than small system
variances) and exemptions by the Ad-
ministrator in  States  that do not have
primary   enforcement  responsibility,
provided  that the  State procedures
meet the requirements of  this para-
graph); and
  (e) Has  adopted and can implement
an adequate plan for the  provision of
safe  drinking water  under emergency
circumstances  including, but not  lim-
ited  to,  earthquakes,  floods,   hurri-
canes, and other natural disasters.
  (f)(l) Has  adopted  authority for as-
sessing administrative penalties unless
the constitution of the State prohibits
the  adoption  of  such authority.  For
public water systems serving a popu-
lation of more than 10,000 individuals,
States must have the authority to im-
pose a penalty of at least $1,000 per day
per violation. For public water systems
serving a population of 10,000  or fewer
individuals, States must have penalties
that are adequate to ensure compliance
with  the  State  regulations as  deter-
mined by the State.
  (2) As long as  criteria in paragraph
(f)(l)  of this section are met, States
may establish a maximum administra-
tive penalty per violation that may be
assessed on a public water system.
  (g) An Indian Tribe shall  not  be re-
quired  to  exercise criminal  enforce-
ment jurisdiction to meet the require-
ments for primary enforcement respon-
sibility.

[41 FR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976,  as amended at 43
FR 53Y3, Feb. 8, 1978; 52 FR 20675, June 2, 1987:
52 FR 41550, Oct. 28, 1987; 53 FR 37410, Sept.
26, 1988; 54 FR 15188, Apr. 17, 1989; 54 FR 52138,
Dec. 20, 1989; 63 FR 23367, Apr. 28, 1998; 63 FR
43846, Aug. 14, 1998;  63 FR 44535, Aug. 19, 1998;
65 FR 26048, May 4, 2000]

§142.11 Initial  determination of pri-
    mary enforcement responsibility.
  (a) A State may apply to the Admin-
istrator for a determination that the
State has primary enforcement respon-
sibility for public water systems in the
State  pursuant  to section  1413 of the
Act. The application shall be as concise
as possible and include a side-by-side
comparison of  the  Federal  require-
ments and the corresponding State au-
thorities,   including  citations to the
specific  statutes and   administrative
regulations or ordinances  and,  wher-
ever  appropriate, judicial  decisions
which demonstrate adequate authority
to  meet the requirements  of §142.10.
The following information is to  be in-
cluded with the State application.
  (1) The  text  of the State's  primary
drinking water  regulations, with ref-
erences to  those State regulations that
vary from comparable  regulations set
forth in part 141  of this chapter, and a
demonstration that any different State
regulation is at  least  as stringent as
the comparable regulation contained in
part 141.
  (2) A description, accompanied by ap-
propriate   documentation,    of   the
State's procedures for the enforcement
                                     566

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.11
of the  State primary drinking water
regulations.  The  submission shall in-
clude:
  (i) A  brief description of the State's
program to maintain a current inven-
tory of  public water systems.
  (ii) A brief description of the State's
program for conducting sanitary sur-
veys, including' an  explanation of the
priorities given  to  various classes of
public water systems.
  (iii) A brief description of the State's
laboratory  approval  or  certification
program,  including  the name(s) of the
responsible State laboratory officer(s)
certified by the Administrator.
  (iv) Identification of laboratory fa-
cilities,  available  to  the  State,  cer-
tified  or approved  by the  Adminis-
trator and capable  of performing  ana-
lytical  measurements  of all contami-
nants specified in the  State's primary
drinking water regulations.
  (v) A  brief description of the State's
program activity to assure that the de-
sign and  construction of  new  or  sub-
stantially  modified public water  sys-
tem facilities will be capable of compli-
ance  with  the  requirements  of  the
State primary drinking water regula-
tions.
  (vi) Copies  of State  statutory  and
regulatory provisions  authorizing  the
adoption and enforcement of State pri-
mary drinking water regulations, and a
brief  description  of State procedures
for administrative  or judicial  action
with  respect to public  water systems
not in  compliance  with such  regula-
tions.
  (3) A  statement that the  State  will
make such reports and will keep such
records as may be required pursuant to
§§142.14 and 142.15.
  (4) If  the State permits  variances or
exemptions from its primary drinking
water  regulations,   the  text  of   the
State's  statutory and regulatory provi-
sions concerning variances and exemp-
tions.
  (5) A  brief description of the State's
plan for the provision of safe drinking
water under emergency conditions.
  NOTE: In satisfaction of this requirement,
for public water supplies from groundwater
sources,  EPA  will  accept the contingency
plan for  providing alternate drinking water
supplies  that is part of a State's Wellhead
Protection Program, where such  program
has been approved by EPA pursuant to sec-
tion 1428 of the SDWA.

  (6)(i) A copy  of the State  statutory
and regulatory  provisions  authorizing
the executive branch of the State gov-
ernment to impose  an  administrative
penalty  on all  public  water systems,
and a brief description of the  State's
authority for administrative  penalties
that  will ensure adequate compliance
of  systems  serving  a  population  of
10,000 or fewer individuals.
  (ii) In instances where the State con-
stitution   prohibits   the   executive
branch of the State  government from
assessing any penalty,  the State shall
submit a copy of the applicable part of
its  constitution and a statement from
its  Attorney  General confirming this
interpretation.
  (7)(i) A statement by the State Attor-
ney General (or the attorney  for the
State  primacy  agency  if it  has inde-
pendent legal counsel) or the attorney
representing the Indian  tribe  that cer-
tifies  that  the  laws and  regulations
adopted  by the State  or  tribal ordi-
nances to carry out the  program were
duly adopted and are enforceable. State
statutes and regulations cited  by the
State Attorney General and tribal ordi-
nances  cited by the   attorney rep-
resenting the Indian tribe shall  be  in
the  form  of  lawfully   adopted  State
statutes and regulations  or tribal ordi-
nances at the time the certification is
made and shall be fully  effective by the
time  the program is approved by EPA.
To  qualify as "independent legal coun-
sel,"  the  attorney  signing the state-
ment  required  by  this  section  shall
have  full authority  to  independently
represent the  State primacy agency  or
Indian tribe in  court on all matters
pertaining to the State  or tribal pro-
gram.
  (ii)  After EPA has received  the docu-
ments required  under paragraph (a)  of
this section, EPA may  selectively  re-
quire supplemental statements  by the
State Attorney  General (or the attor-
ney for the  State primacy agency if it
has independent legal counsel) or the
attorney representing the Indian tribe.
Each  supplemental statement shall ad-
dress  all  issues concerning  the ade-
quacy of State authorities to  meet the
requirements of §142.10  that have been
                                     567
      203-160 D-19

-------
§142.12
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
identified by  EPA after  thorough, ex-
amination as  unresolved  by the docu-
ments submitted  under paragraph (a)
of this section.
  (b)(l) The administrator shall act on
an application submitted pursuant to
§142.11 within 90  days  after receiving
such  application,  and  shall promptly
inform the State in writing of this ac-
tion.  If he denies the application, his
written notification to  the State shall
include a statement of  reasons for the
denial.
  (2) A final determination by the Ad-
ministrator that  a State has met or
has not met the requirements for pri-
mary enforcement responsibility shall
take effect in accordance  with the pub-
lic  notice  requirements  and  related
procedures under § 142.13.
  (3) When  the  Administrator's deter-
mination becomes effective pursuant
to §142.13, it  shall continue in  effect
unless terminated pursuant to §142.17.
[41 FR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976,  as amended at 54
PR 52138, Deo. 20,  1989; 60 FR 33661, June 28,
1995; 63 FR 23367, Apr. 28, 1998]

§ 142.12  Revision of State programs.
  (a)  General requirements. Either EPA
or the primacy  State may initiate ac-
tions that require the  State to revise
its approved State primacy program.
To retain primary enforcement respon-
sibility, States must adopt all new and
revised  national   primary   drinking
water regulations  promulgated in part
141 of this  chapter and any other re-
quirements specified in  this part.
  (1) Whenever a  State revises its ap-
proved primacy program  to adopt new
or revised  Federal  regulations,  the
State must submit a request to the Ad-
ministrator for approval  of  the pro-
gram revision, using the procedures de-
scribed in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of
this  section. The  Administrator shall
approve  or disapprove  each State re-
quest for approval of a program  revi-
sion  based on the requirements of the
Safe  Drinking Water Act and of this
part.
  (2)  For all State program revisions
not covered under §142.12(a)(l), the re-
view  procedures outlined  in §142.17(a)
shall apply.
  (b)  Timing of State  requests for ap-
proval of program revisions  to adopt new
or revised Federal  regulations.  (1) Com-
plete and final  State  requests for ap-
proval of program revisions  to  adopt
new or revised EPA regulations must
be submitted to the Administrator not
later than 2 years after promulgation
of the new or revised EPA regulations,
unless the State requests an extension
and the Administrator has  approved
the  request pursuant  to paragraph
(b)(2) of this section.  If the State ex-
pects to submit a final State request
for approval of  a  program revision to
EPA more than 2 years after promulga-
tion of the new or revised EPA regula-
tions, the State  shall request an exten-
sion of the  deadline before the expira-
tion of the 2-year period.
  (2) The final date for submission of a
complete  and final State request for a
program revision  may be  extended by
EPA for up to a two-year period upon a
written application by the State to the
Administrator.  In the  extension  appli-
cation the State must demonstrate it
is requesting the  extension because it
cannot meet the  original  deadline for
reasons beyond  its control  despite  a
good faith effort to do so. The applica-
tion must include a schedule for  the
submission of a  final request  by a cer-
tain time and provide sufficient  infor-
mation to demonstrate that the State:
  (i)(A) Currently  lacks the legislative
or regulatory authority to enforce the
new or revised requirements, or
  (B) Currently  lacks  the  program ca-
pability adequate to  implement  the
new or revised requirements; or
  (C)  Is requesting the  extension  to
group  two or more program  revisions
in a single legislative or regulatory ac-
tion; and
  (ii) Is implementing the EPA require-
ments to be adopted by the State in its
program  revision  pursuant  to  para-
graph  (b)(3) of this section within the
scope of its current authority and ca-
pabilities.
  (3) To be granted an extension,  the
State  must agree with EPA to meet
certain requirements during the exten-
sion period, which may include the fol-
lowing types of  activities  as  deter-
mined  appropriate  by  the  Adminis-
trator on a case-by-case basis:
                                     568

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.12
  (i) Informing- public water systems of
the new EPA (and upcoming State) re-
quirements and that EPA will be over-
seeing implementation of the require-
ments until the State, if eligible for in-
terim primacy, submits a complete and
final primacy revision request to EPA,
or in  all other  cases, until  EPA  ap-
proves the State program revision;
  (ii) Collecting, storing and managing
laboratory results, public notices, and
other  compliance and  operation data
required by the EPA regulations;
  (ill)  Assisting  EPA in the  develop-
ment of the  technical aspects  of  en-
forcement actions  and conducting  in-
formal  follow-up on violations (tele-
phone calls, letters, etc.);
  (iv) Providing technical assistance to
public water systems;
  (v) Providing  EPA with all informa-
tion prescribed  by §142.15 of  this part
on State reporting; and
  (vi) For States whose  request for an
extension is based on a current lack of
program capability adequate to imple-
ment  the  new  requirements,  taking
steps  agreed to  by EPA and the State
during the extension period to  remedy
the deficiency.
  (c) Contents of a State request for  ap-
proval  of a program revision.  (1) The
State  request for EPA  approval of a
program revision shall be concise and
must include:
  (i)  The  documentation  necessary
(pursuant to §142.11(a))  to  update the
approved State  primacy program, and
identification of those elements of the
approved State  primacy program that
have not changed because  of the pro-
gram   revision.  The  documentation
shall include a side-by-side  comparison
of the  Federal  requirements and the
corresponding  State  authorities,  in-
cluding citations to  the  specific stat-
utes and administrative regulations or
ordinances and, wherever appropriate,
judicial  decisions which demonstrate
adequate authority  to  meet  the  re-
quirements  of §142.10 as they apply to
the program revision.
  (ii) Any additional materials that are
listed in §142.16 of this part for a spe-
cific EPA  regulation, as  appropriate;
and
  (ill) For a complete and  final State
request only,  unless  one  of the condi-
tions listed in paragraph. (c)(2) of this
section are met,  a statement  by the
State Attorney General (or the attor-
ney for the State  primacy agency if it
has independent legal counsel) or the
attorney representing the Indian tribe
that certifies that the laws and regula-
tions adopted by the State or tribal or-
dinances to carry out the program revi-
sion were duly adopted and are enforce-
able.  State statutes  and  regulations
cited by the  State Attorney General
and tribal  ordinances cited by  the  at-
torney for the  Indian tribe shall be  in
the form  of  lawfully adopted State
statutes and regulations or tribal ordi-
nances at the time the certification is
made and shall be  fully effective by the
time  the request for program revision
is  approved by EPA. To  qualify  as
"independent legal counsel," the attor-
ney signing the statement required by
this section shall have full authority to
independently represent the State pri-
macy agency  or tribe in court on  all
matters pertaining to the State or trib-
al program.
  (2) An  Attorney General's statement
will be required as part of the State  re-
quest for EPA approval of a program
revision unless EPA specifically waives
this requirement for  a specific  regula-
tion at the time EPA promulgates the
regulation,  or by  later written notice
from the Administrator to the State.
  (3) After  EPA has received the docu-
ments required  under paragraph  (c)(l)
of  this  section, EPA  may selectively
require   supplemental statements  by
the State Attorney General (or the at-
torney for  the State primacy agency if
it has independent legal counsel) or the
attorney representing the Indian tribe.
Each supplemental statement shall ad-
dress all issues concerning  the ade-
quacy of State authorities to meet the
requirements of §142.10 that have been
identified by EPA after  thorough ex-
amination  as unresolved by the docu-
ments submitted under paragraph (c)(l)
of this section.
  (d) Procedures for review of a State  re-
quest for approval of a program revision—
(1)  Preliminary request,  (i)  The State
may submit to  the Administrator for
his or her review a preliminary request
for approval of each program revision,
containing  the  information listed  in
paragraph (c)(l)  of this section, in draft
form. The preliminary request does not
                                     569

-------
§142.13
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
require an  Attorney  General's state-
ment in draft form, but does require
draft  State  statutory  or  regulatory
changes and a side-by-side comparison
of State authorities with EPA require-
ments to  demonstrate that  the  State
program revision  meets EPA require-
ments under §142.10 of this  part. The
preliminary  request  should be  sub-
mitted to the Administrator  as soon as
practicable  after the  promulgation of
the EPA regulations.
  (ii) The Administrator  will review
the  preliminary request  submitted in
accordance  with paragraph (d)(l)(i) of
this section and make a tentative de-
termination  on the request. The  Ad-
ministrator will send the tentative de-
termination  and  other comments  or
suggestions to the State for its use in
developing  the State's final  request
under paragraph (d)(2)  of this section.
  (2) Final request.  The State  must sub-
mit a complete and final request for
approval of a program revision to the
Administrator for his or her review and
approval.  The request must contain the
information  listed in  paragraph (c)(l)
of  this section in  complete  and  final
form, in accordance with any tentative
determination EPA may have issued.
Complete  and final  State requests for
program revisions  shall be  submitted
within two  years  of the promulgation
of the new or revised EPA regulations,
as specified in paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion.
  (3) EPA's determination on  a complete
and final request, (i)  The Administrator
shall act  on a State's request for ap-
proval of  a program revision within 90
days after determining that  the  State
request is complete  and final and shall
promptly  notify the State of his/her de-
termination.
  (ii) If the Administrator disapproves
a final request for  approval of a pro-
gram revision, the Administrator will
notify the State in writing. Such noti-
fication will include a  statement of the
reasons for disapproval.
  (iii) A final determination by the Ad-
ministrator on a State's request for ap-
proval of a program revision  shall take
effect in accordance with the public no-
tice requirements  and related proce-
dures under §142.13.
  (e) Interim primary enforcement author-
ity. A State with an approved primacy
program for each existing national pri-
mary drinking water regulation shall
be considered to have interim primary
enforcement authority with respect to
each new  or revised national drinking
water regulation that it adopts begin-
ning when  the  new or  revised  State
regulation becomes  effective or when
the complete primacy revision applica-
tion is submitted to the Administrator,
whichever is later, and shall end when
the  Administrator  approves  or dis-
approves  the State's revised  primacy
program.
[54 FR 52138, Dec. 20, 1989, as amended at 63
FR 23367, Apr. 28, 1998; 66 FR 3780, Jan. 16,
2001]

§ 142.13 Public hearing.
  (a) The  Administrator shall  provide
an opportunity for a public hearing be-
fore a final determination pursuant to
§ 142.11 that the State meets or does  not
meet  the  requirements  for  obtaining
primary enforcement responsibility, or
a  final   determination   pursuant   to
§142.12(d)(3) to approve or disapprove a
State request for approval of a program
revision, or a final  determination pur-
suant to §142.17 that a State no longer
meets the  requirements for primary en-
forcement responsibility.
  (b) The  Administrator shall  publish
notice  of  any determination specified
in paragraph (a) of this section in  the
FEDERAL REGISTER and in a newspaper
or newspapers of general circulation in
the State  involved within 15 days after
making such determination,  with a
statement of his reasons for the deter-
mination.  Such notice shall inform in-
terested persons that they may request
a public  hearing on the Administra-
tor's determination. Such notice shall
also indicate one or more locations in
the State  where information submitted
by  the State pursuant  to §142.11 is
available  for inspection by the general
public.  A  public hearing may  be  re-
quested by any interested person other
than a Federal agency. Frivolous or in-
substantial  requests for hearing may
be denied  by the Administrator.
  (c) Bequests  for  hearing submitted
pursuant  to paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion shall  be submitted to the Adminis-
trator within 30 days after publication
of notice  of opportunity  for hearing in
the FEDERAL REGISTER. Such requests
                                     570

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.14
shall include the  following informa-
tion:
  (1) The  name, address and telephone
number of the individual, organization
or other entity requesting a hearing.
  (2) A brief statement of the request-
ing  person's interest in the Adminis-
trator's determination and  of informa-
tion that  the requesting person intends
to submit at such hearing.
  (3) The signature of the  individual
making the request; or, if the request
is made on behalf of an organization or
other entity, the signature of a respon-
sible official  of the  organization or
other entity.
  (d) The  Administrator shall give no-
tice in the FEDERAL REGISTER and  in a
newspaper or newspapers of general cir-
culation in the  State involved  of  any
hearing to  be held pursuant to a re-
quest submitted by an interested  per-
son or on  his own motion. Notice of the
hearing shall also be sent to the person
requesting a hearing, if any, and to the
State involved.  Notice of the hearing
shall include  a  statement of the pur-
pose of the hearing,  information re-
garding the time and location or loca-
tions for  the  hearing  and the address
and  telephone number of an office at
which  interested persons may  obtain
further  information  concerning  the
hearing. At least one hearing location
specified in the public notice shall be
within the  involved  State.  Notice of
hearing shall  be given not less than 15
days prior  to the  time scheduled for
the hearing.
  (e)  Hearings convened pursuant to
paragraph (d) of this  section shall be
conducted before a hearing officer to be
designated by the  Administrator.  The
hearing shall be conducted by the hear-
ing officer in  an informal, orderly  and
expeditious manner. The hearing offi-
cer shall  have authority to call  wit-
nesses, receive oral and written testi-
mony and take such  other action as
may be necessary to assure the fair and
efficient conduct of the hearing. Fol-
lowing the  conclusion of the hearing,
the  hearing  officer shall forward  the
record of  the  hearing  to the Adminis-
trator.
  (f) After reviewing the record of the
hearing, the Administrator  shall issue
an  order  affirming the determination
referred to in  paragraph (a)  of this  sec-
tion or rescinding such determination.
If the  determination is affirmed, it
shall become effective as of the date of
the Administrator's order.
  (g) If no timely request for hearing is
received and  the Administrator does
not determine to hold a hearing on his
own motion, the Administrator's  deter-
mination shall become effective 30 days
after notice is issued pursuant to para-
graph (b) of this section.
  (h) If a determination of the Admin-
istrator that a State no longer  meets
the requirements for primary enforce-
ment responsibility  becomes effective,
the State may subsequently apply for a
determination that  it meets such re-
quirements by submitting to the Ad-
ministrator information demonstrating
that it has remedied the  deficiencies
found  by  the  Administrator  without
adversely  sacrificing other  aspects of
its  program  required for primary en-
forcement responsibility.
[41 FR  2918,  Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 54
FR 52140, Dec 20, 1989;  60 FR 33661, June 28,
1995]

§ 142.14 Records kept by States.
  (a) Each State which has primary en-
forcement  responsibility shall  main-
tain records of tests, measurements,
analyses, decisions, and determinations
performed on each public water system
to determine compliance with applica-
ble  provisions of State primary drink-
ing water regulations.
  (1) Records  of microbiological anal-
yses shall be retained for not less than
1 year. Actual laboratory reports may
be kept or data may be transferred to
tabular summaries,  provided that the
information retained includes:
  (i) The analytical method used;
  (ii) The  number of samples analyzed
each month;
  (iii) The analytical results, set forth
in a form which makes  possible  com-
parison with  the limits specified in
§§141.63, 141.71, and 141.72 of  this chap-
ter.
  (2) Records  of microbiological anal-
yses of repeat or special samples  shall
be retained for not less than one year
in the form  of actual laboratory re-
ports or in an  appropriate summary
form.
  (3) Records  of  turbidity  measure-
ments  must be kept  for not less than
                                     571

-------
§142.14
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
one  year. The  information retained
must be  set  forth in a  form  which
makes  possible  comparison  with the
limits  specified  in  §§141.71,   141.73,
141.173  and 141.175,  141.550-141.553 and
141.560-141.564   of  this  chapter.   Until
June 29, 1993, for any public water sys-
tem which is providing filtration treat-
ment and until December 30, 1991, for
any public water system not providing
filtration treatment and not required
by the State to provide filtration treat-
ment, records  kept must be set forth in
a form  which  makes possible compari-
son with the limits contained in §141.13
of this chapter.
  (4)(i) Records of disinfectant residual
measurements and other  parameters
necessary to document disinfection ef-
fectiveness in accordance with §§141.72
and  141.74 of this chapter and the re-
porting   requirements   of   §§141.75,
141.175, and 141.570, of this chapter must
be kept for not less than one year.
  (ii) Records  of decisions made on a
system-by-system   and   case-by-case
basis under provisions of part 141, sub-
part H, subpart P, or subpart T of this
chapter, must  be made in writing and
kept by the State.
  (A) Records  of decisions made under
the following  provisions shall be kept
for 40 years (or until one year after the
decision is reversed or revised)  and a
copy of the decision must be provided
to the system:
  (2)  Section 141.73(a)(l)—Any decision
to allow a public water system  using
conventional  filtration  treatment or
direct filtration  to substitute a tur-
bidity limit greater than 0.5 NTU;
  (2)  Section 141.73(b)(l)—Any  decision
to allow a public water system  using
slow sand filtration to substitute a tur-
bidity limit greater than 1 NTU;
  (3)  Section 141.74(b)(2)—Any  decision
to allow an unfiltered public water sys-
tem to  use continuous turbidity moni-
toring;
  (4)  Section  141.74(b)(6)(i)—Any  deci-
sion to allow an unfiltered public water
system to sample residual disinfectant
concentration at alternate locations if
it also has ground water source(s);
  (5)  Section 141.74(c)(l)—Any  decision
to allow a public water system  using
filtration treatment to use continuous
turbidity monitoring; or a public water
system using slow sand filtration or fil-
tration treatment  other than conven-
tional treatment,  direct filtration or
diatomaceous earth  filtration to  re-
duce  turbidity  sampling to  once per
day; or for systems serving 500 people
or fewer to reduce turbidity sampling
to once per day;
  (6)  Section 141.74(c)(3)(i)—Any  deci-
sion to allow a filtered public water
system to sample disinfectant residual
concentration at alternate  locations if
it also has ground water source(s);
  (7) Section 141.75(a)(2)(ix)—Any deci-
sion to allow reduced reporting by an
unfiltered public water system;
  (8) Section 141.75(b)(2)(iv)—Any deci-
sion to allow reduced reporting by a fil-
tered public water system; and
  (9)   Section   141.76—Any  decisions
made to approve alternate recycle lo-
cations, require modifications to  recy-
cle return  locations, or require modi-
fications to recycle practices.
  (B) Records of decisions made under
the following provisions shall be kept
for one year after the decision is made:
  (7)  Section 141.71(b)(l)(i)—Any  deci-
sion that a  violation  of monthly  CT
compliance  requirements was  caused
by  circumstances  that were  unusual
and unpredictable.
  (2) Section 141.71(b)(l)(iv)—Any deci-
sion that a violation of the disinfection
effectiveness criteria was not caused by
a deficiency in treatment of the source
water;
  (3) Section 141.71(b)(5)—Any decision
that a violation of the total coliform
MCL was not caused by a deficiency in
treatment of the source water;
  (4) Section 141.74(b)(l)—Any decision
that total  coliform monitoring other-
wise required because the turbidity of
the source  water exceeds 1  NTU is not
feasible, except that if such decision al-
lows  a system  to avoid  monitoring
without  receiving  State  approval in
each  instance,  records of the decision
shall be kept until one year after the
decision is rescinded or revised.
  (C) Records of decisions made under
the following provisions shall be kept
for the specified period or  40 years,
whichever is less.
  (7)  Section 141.71(a)(2)(i)—Any  deci-
sion that an  event  in which the source
water turbidity which exceeded 5 NTU
for an unfiltered public water  system
                                     572

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.14
was unusual and unpredictable shall be
kept for 10 years.
  (2) Section 141.71(b)(l)(iii)—Any deci-
sion by the State that failure to meet
the disinfectant residual concentration
requirements  of  §141.72(a)(3)(i)  was
caused by circumstances that were un-
usual and unpredictable, shall be kept
unless filtration is installed. A copy of
the decision must be provided  to  the
system.
  (3) Section 141.71(b)(2)—Any decision
that a public water system's watershed
control program meets the  require-
ments of this  section  shall  be kept
until the next decision is available and
filed.
  (4)  Section  141.70(c)—Any  decision
that an individual is  a  qualified oper-
ator for a public water system using a
surface water source or a ground water
source under the  direct  influence  of
surface water shall be  maintained until
the  qualification is  withdrawn.  The
State may keep this information in the
form of a list which is updated periodi-
cally.  If such  qualified operators  are
classified  by category,  the  decision
shall include that classification.
  (5) Section 141.71(b)(3)—Any decision
that a party other than the State is ap-
proved by the State to conduct on-site
inspections  shall be  maintained until
withdrawn.  The  State may keep  this
information in the form of a list which
is updated periodically.
  (6) Section 141.71(b)(4)—Any decision
that an unfiltered public water system
has been identified as the  source  of a
waterborne  disease  outbreak,  and, if
applicable,  that  it has  been modified
sufficiently to prevent another such oc-
currence shall  be kept until filtration
treatment  is installed.  A copy  of  the
decision must be provided  to  the  sys-
tem.
  (7) Section 141.72—Any decision that
certain interim  disinfection  require-
ments  are  necessary for an unfiltered
public  water system for  which   the
State has determined  that filtration is
necessary, and a list of those require-
ments,  shall be kept until filtration
treatment  is installed.  A copy  of  the
requirements must be provided  to  the
system.
  (5) Section 141.72(a)(2)(ii)—Any deci-
sion that  automatic  shut-off of deliv-
ery of water to the distribution system
of an  unfiltered public water system
would  cause an  unreasonable  risk  to
health or interfere with fire protection
shall be kept until rescinded.
  (9) Section 141.72(a)(4)(ii)—Any deci-
sion by the State, based on site-specific
considerations, that an unfiltered sys-
tem has  no means  for having a sample
transported and analyzed for HPC by a
certified laboratory under the requisite
time and temperature conditions speci-
fied by §141.74(a)(3) and that  the sys-
tem is providing adequate disinfection
in the  distribution system, so  that the
disinfection requirements contained  in
§141.72(a)(4)(i) do not  apply,  and the
basis for the decision, shall  be kept
until the decision is  reversed  or re-
vised. A  copy of the decision  must  be
provided to the system.
  (10) Section 141.72(b)(3)(ii)—Any deci-
sion by the State, based on site-specific
conditions,  that  a  filtered system has
no  means for having a sample trans-
ported and analyzed for HPC by a cer-
tified laboratory under  the requisite
time and temperature conditions speci-
fied by §141.74(a)(3) and that  the sys-
tem is providing adequate disinfection
in the  distribution system, so  that the
disinfection requirements contained  in
§141.72(b)(3)(i) do not  apply,  and the
basis for the decision, shall  be kept
until the decision is  reversed  or re-
vised. A  copy of the decision  must  be
provided to the system.
  (11) Section  141.73(d)—Any  decision
that a  public water  system,  having
demonstrated to  the State that an al-
ternative  filtration   technology,   in
combination with  disinfection  treat-
ment,  consistently achieves 99.9  per-
cent removal  and/or  inactivation  of
Giardia lamblia cysts and  99.99 percent
removal  and/or inactivation of viruses,
may use such   alternative filtration
technology, shall be kept  until the de-
cision is  reversed or revised. A copy  of
the decision must  be provided to the
system.
  (12) Section 141.74(b), table 3.1—Any
decision  that a  system  using  either
preformed chloramines or chloramines
formed  by  the  addition  of ammonia
prior to  the addition  of  chlorine has
demonstrated that 99.99  percent re-
moval  and/or inactivation  of  viruses
has been achieved at particular CT val-
ues, and  a list of those values, shall  be
                                     573

-------
§142.14
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
kept until the decision  is reversed or
revised. A copy of the list of required
values must be provided  to the system.
  (13) Section 141.74(b)(3)(v)—Any deci-
sion that a system using a disinfectant
other than chlorine may use CT999 val-
ues other  than those in tables 2.1 or 3.1
and/or other operational parameters to
determine  if the minimum  total inac-
tivation rates required by §141.72(a)(l)
are being met, and what those values
or parameters  are, shall be kept until
the decision  is reversed or revised. A
copy of the list  of required values or
parameters must be provided  to  the
system.
  (14) Section 142.16(b)(2)(i)(B)—Any de-
cision  that a system using a  ground
water source is under the direct influ-
ence of surface water.
  (iii)  Records  of any  determination
that a public water system supplied by
a  surface  water  source or  a  ground
water source under the direct influence
of surface water is not required to pro-
vide filtration treatment shall be kept
for 40 years or until withdrawn, which-
ever is earlier. A copy of the  deter-
mination  must be provided to the sys-
tem.
  (5) Records of  each of the following
decisions  made pursuant to the total
coliform provisions of part 141  shall be
made in writing and retained  by  the
State.
  (i) Records of the following decisions
must be retained for 5 years.
  (A) Section 141.21(b)(l)—Any decision
to waive the 24-hour time limit for col-
lecting repeat samples  after  a total
coliform-positive routine sample if the
public water  system has a logistical
problem in collecting the repeat sam-
ple that is beyond the system's control,
and what  alternative time  limit  the
system must meet.
  (B) Section 141.21(b)(5)—Any decision
to allow a system to waive the  require-
ment  for  five   routine samples  the
month following a total coliform-posi-
tive sample.  If the waiver  decision is
made as provided in §141.21(b)(5),  the
record of the decision must contain  all
the items  listed in that paragraph.
  (C) Section 141.21(c)—Any decision to
invalidate  a   total  coliform-positive
sample. If the decision to invalidate a
total coliform-positive sample as pro-
vided in §141.21(c)(l)(iii) is made,  the
record of the decision must contain all
the items listed in that paragraph.
  (ii)  Records of  each of the following
decisions must be  retained in  such  a
manner so that each system's current
status may be determined.
  (A)  Section 141.21(a)(2)—Any decision
to  reduce  the  total  coliform moni-
toring  frequency  for  a  community
water system serving  1,000 persons or
fewer, that has no history of total coli-
form  contamination in its current con-
figuration and had a  sanitary  survey
conducted within the  past five years
showing that the  system is  supplied
solely  by  a  protected  groundwater
source and is free  of sanitary defects,
to less than once  per month, as pro-
vided in §141.21(a)(2); and what  the re-
duced monitoring frequency is. A copy
of the  reduced monitoring frequency
must  be provided to the system.
  (B)  Section 141.21(a)(3)(i)—Any  deci-
sion to reduce the total coliform moni-
toring frequency for a non-community
water system using only ground water
and serving 1,000 persons  or  fewer to
less than once per quarter, as provided
in §141.21(a)(3)(i), and what the reduced
monitoring frequency is. A copy of the
reduced monitoring frequency must be
provided to the system.
  (C)  Section 141.21(a)(3)(ii)—Any  deci-
sion to reduce the total coliform moni-
toring frequency for a non-community
water system using only ground water
and serving  more  than 1,000  persons
during  any  month the system serves
1,000  persons or  fewer,  as  provided in
§141.21(a)(3)(ii). A copy of  the  reduced
monitoring frequency must be provided
to the system.
  (D)  Section 141.21(a)(5)—Any decision
to waive the 24-hour limit for taking a
total   coliform  sample  for a  public
water system which uses surface water,
or ground water under the direct influ-
ence  of surface water, and  which does
not practice filtration in  accordance
with  part 141, subpart H,  and which
measures a source water turbidity level
exceeding 1 NTU near the first  service
connection as provided in § 141.21(a)(5).
  (B)  Section 141.21(d)(l)—Any decision
that a non-community water system  is
using  only  protected  and  disinfected
ground water and therefore may reduce
the frequency of  its sanitary survey to
                                     574

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.14
less than once every five years, as pro-
vided in §141.21(d), and what that fre-
quency is. A copy of the reduced fre-
quency must be provided to the sys-
tem.
  (F)  Section  141.21(d)(2)—A   list  of
agents other than the State, if any, ap-
proved  by the State  to  conduct sani-
tary surveys.
  (G) Section 141.21(e)(2)—Any decision
to allow a public water system to forgo
fecal coliform or E. coli testing on a
total coliform-positive sample  if that
system assumes that  the total coli-
form-positive sample is fecal coliform-
positive or E. coli- positive, as provided
in§141.21(e)(2).
  (6) Records of analysis for other than
microbiological contaminants (includ-
ing  total coliform, fecal  coliform, and
heterotrophic  plate  count),  residual
disinfectant  concentration,  other pa-
rameters  necessary to determine dis-
infection  effectiveness (including tem-
perature  and pH measurements), and
turbidity shall be retained for not less
than 12 years and shall include at least
the following information:
  (i) Date and place of sampling.
  (ii) Date and results of analyses.
  (7) Any decisions made pursuant to
the provisions of part 141, subpart P or
subpart T of  this chapter.
  (i)  Records  of systems consulting
with the  State concerning a modifica-
tion  to  disinfection  practice  under
§§141.170(d),  141.172(0),  and  141.542  of
this chapter, including the status  of
the consultation.
  (ii) Records of decisions that  a sys-
tem using alternative filtration  tech-
nologies,  as  allowed under §§141.173(b)
and  §141.552  of this chapter,  can con-
sistently  achieve  a 99.9 percent re-
moval and/or inactivation of  Giardia
lamblia  cysts, 99.99  percent removal
and/or inactivation of viruses,  and 99
percent  removal  of  Cryptosporidium
oocysts.  The decisions must include
State-set  enforceable  turbidity  limits
for each system. A copy of the decision
must be kept until  the decision is re-
versed or revised. The State must pro-
vide a copy of the decision to the sys-
tem.
  (iii) Records of systems required to
do filter self-assessment, CPE, or CCP
under the requirements of §§141.175 and
141.563 of this chapter.
  (b) Records required to be kept pur-
suant to paragraph (a) of this section
must be in a form admissible as  evi-
dence   in   State   enforcement  pro-
ceedings.
  (c) Each State which has primary  en-
forcement  responsibility  shall  main-
tain current inventory information  for
every public water system in the State
and  shall retain inventory  records of
public water systems for not less than
12 years.
  (d) Each State which has primary  en-
forcement  responsibility shall retain,
for not less than  12 years, files which
shall include for each such public water
system in the State:
  (1) Reports of sanitary surveys;
  (2) Records of any State approvals;
  (3) Records of any enforcement  ac-
tions.
  (4) A record of the most recent vul-
nerability determination, including  the
monitoring results and other data sup-
porting the determination, the State's
findings based on the supporting data
and  any additional bases for such  de-
termination;  except  that it shall  be
kept in perpetuity  or until a more cur-
rent vulnerability determination  has
been issued.
  (5) A record of all current monitoring
requirements and the most recent mon-
itoring  frequency  decision  pertaining
to  each contaminant,  including   the
monitoring results and  other data sup-
porting the decision, the State's find-
ings based on the supporting data and
any additional bases for such decision;
except that the record shall be kept in
perpetuity or until a more recent mon-
itoring  frequency  decision has been
issued.
  (6) A record of the most recent asbes-
tos repeat monitoring  determination,
including  the monitoring results and
other data supporting the  determina-
tion, the State's findings based on the
supporting  data and any  additional
bases for the determination and the  re-
peat monitoring frequency;  except that
these records shall be maintained in
perpetuity or until a more current  re-
peat  monitoring   determination  has
been issued.
  (7) Records of annual certifications
received from systems pursuant to part
141, subpart K demonstrating the sys-
tem's compliance  with the  treatment
                                     575

-------
§142.14
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
techniques   for   acrylamide  and/or
epichlorohydrin in §14.111.
  (8) Records of the currently applica-
ble or most recent  State determina-
tions, including all supporting informa-
tion and  an explanation  of  the  tech-
nical basis for  each  decision,  made
under  the following provisions  of 40
CFR, part 141, subpart I for the control
of lead and copper:
  (i) Section  141.81(b)—for any water
system deemed to be optimized under
§141.81(b)(l) or (b)(3)  of  this chapter,
any conditions imposed by the State on
specific water systems to ensure the
continued operation  and maintenance
of  corrosion   control treatment  in
place;
  (ii) Section 141.82(b)—decisions to re-
quire a water system to conduct corro-
sion control treatment studies;
  (iii) Section 141.82(d)—designations of
optimal corrosion control treatment;
  (iv) Section 141.82(f)—designations of
optimal water quality parameters;
  (v)  Section  141.82(h)—decisions  to
modify a public water system's optimal
corrosion control treatment or water
quality parameters;
  (vi)  Section 141.83(b)(2)—determina-
tions of source water treatment;
  (vii)   Section   141.83(b)(4)—designa-
tions of  maximum  permissible  con-
centrations  of  lead  and  copper  in
source water;
  (viii)   Section   141.84(e)—determina-
tions establishing shorter lead service
line service line replacement schedules
under §141.84;
  (ix)     Sections     141.81(b)(3)(iii),
141.86(d)(4)(vii), and 141.86(g)(4)(iii)—de-
terminations of additional monitoring
requirements  and/or  other actions  re-
quired to maintain  optimal  corrosion
control by systems monitoring for lead
and  copper at the tap less  frequently
than  once every  six  months  that
change treatment or add a new source
of water;
  (x) Section 141.85—system-specific de-
cisions regarding the content of  writ-
ten public education materials and/or
the distribution of these materials;
  (xi) Section  141.86(b)(5)—system-spe-
cific determinations regarding use of
non-first-draw  samples  at  non-tran-
sient non-community  water systems,
and community water systems meeting
the criteria of §§141.85(c)(7)(i) and  (ii) of
this chapter,  that operate 24 hours a
day;
  (xii)  Section  141.86(c)—system-spe-
cific designations of sampling locations
for systems subject to reduced moni-
toring;
  (xiii)   Section  141.86(d)(iv)(A)—sys-
tem-specific determinations pertaining
to alternative sample collection peri-
ods  for  systems  subject to reduced
monitoring;
  (xiv)  Section   141.86(g)—determina-
tions of small system monitoring waiv-
ers, waiver recertifications, and waiver
revocations;
  (xv)  Section 141.87(c)(3)—determina-
tions regarding  representative  entry
point locations at ground water  sys-
tems;
  (xvi) Section 141.90(e)(4)—system-spe-
cific determinations regarding the sub-
mission of information to demonstrate
compliance with  partial  lead  service
line replacement requirements; and
  (xvii)  Section   141.90(f)—system-spe-
cific decisions regarding the resubmis-
sion of detailed documentation dem-
onstrating completion of public  edu-
cation requirements.
  (9) Records  of reports and any other
information submitted by PWSs under
§141.90  of  this  chapter,   including
records of any  90th percentile  values
calculated by  the State under § 141.90(h)
of this chapter.
  (10) Records of State activities, and
the results thereof, to:
  (i) Verify compliance with  State de-
terminations issued under §§141.82(f) of
this chapter,  141.82(h) of this chapter,
141.83(b)(2)  of   this  chapter,   and
141.83(b)(4) of this chapter;
  (ii) Verify  compliance  with the re-
quirements related to partial  lead serv-
ice line replacement under §141.84(d) of
this chapter and compliance  with  lead
service   line  replacement   schedules
under §141.84(e) of this chapter; and
  (iii)  Invalidate  tap water  lead and
copper samples under §141.86(f) of this
chapter.
  (11) Records of each  system's  cur-
rently applicable or most recently des-
ignated monitoring  requirements. If,
for the records identified in paragraphs
(d)(8)(i) through (d)(8)(xvii) of this sec-
tion, no change is made to State deter-
minations during a  12-year  retention
period,  the   State  shall retain   the
                                     576

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.15
record until a new decision, determina-
tion, or designation has been issued.
  (12) Records of the currently applica-
ble  or  most recent State  determina-
tions, including all supporting informa-
tion and an explanation of the tech-
nical basis  for each  decision,  made
under  the  following  provisions  of 40
CFR part 141, subpart L for the control
of  disinfectants and disinfection  by-
products. These records  must  also in-
clude interim measures toward instal-
lation.
  (i) States must keep records of sys-
tems that are installing  GAC or mem-
brane  technology  in  accordance  with
§141.64(b)(2)  of  this  chapter. These
records must include the date by which
the  system is required  to  have com-
pleted installation.
  (ii) States must  keep records of sys-
tems that are required, by the State, to
meet alternative  minimum  TOO re-
moval  requirements or for whom the
State has determined that the source
water is not amenable to enhanced co-
agulation    in    accordance    with
§ 141.135(b)(3) and (4) of this chapter, re-
spectively. These records must include
the alternative limits and rationale for
establishing the alternative limits.
  (iii) States must keep records of sub-
part  H  systems  using   conventional
treatment meeting any  of the  alter-
native    compliance    criteria    in
§ 141.135(a)(2) or (3) of this chapter.
  (iv) States must  keep a  register of
qualified operators  that  have met the
State  requirements developed  under
§142.16(f)(2).
  (13) Records of systems with multiple
wells considered to be one treatment
plant in accordance with §141.132(a)(2)
of this chapter and §142.16(f)(5).
  (14) Monitoring plans for subpart H
systems serving more than 3,300 per-
sons in  accordance with  §141.132(f) of
this chapter.
  (15) List of laboratories approved for
analyses in accordance with §141.131(b)
of this chapter.
  (16) List of systems required  to mon-
itor for  disinfectants and disinfection
byproducts in accordance with part 141,
subpart  L  of  this chapter. The list
must indicate  what disinfectants and
DBFs, other than chlorine, TTHM, and
HAA5, if any, are measured.
  (e) Each State which has primary en-
forcement responsibility  shall  retain
records pertaining to each variance and
exemption granted by it for a period of
not less than 5 years following the ex-
piration of such variance or exemption.
  (f) Public notification records  under
Subpart Q of Part  141 of this  chapter
received from public water systems (in-
cluding  certifications  of compliance
and copies of  public notices) and any
state determinations  establishing al-
ternative  public  notification require-
ments for the water systems must  be
retained for three years.
  (g) Records required to be kept under
this  section  shall be available  to the
Regional Administrator upon request.
The records  required to be kept  under
this  section  shall be  maintained and
made available for public inspection by
the State, or,  the State at its  option
may require suppliers of water to make
available for  public inspection  those
records maintained in accordance with
§141.33.
[41 PR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as  amended at 54
FR 27537, June 29, 1989; 55 FR 25065, June 19,
1990; 56 FR 3595, Jan. 30,  1991; 56 FR 26562,
June 7, 1991; 63 FR 69475, 69519, Dec. 16, 1998;
65 FR 2014, Jan.  12, 2000; 65 FR 26048, May 4,
2000; 66 FR 31105, June 8, 2001; 67 FR 1843, Jan.
14, 2002]
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38857, June
29, 2004, §142.14  was amended in paragraph
(d)(12)(iv)   by  removing   the   citation
"§142.16(f)(2)"  and  adding   in  its   place
"§142 16(h)(2)", and in paragraph (d)(13) by re-
moving the citation "§142.16(f)(5)" and adding
in its  place "§142.16(h)(5)", effective July  29,
2004

§ 142.15  Reports by States.
  Each  State  which has  primary en-
forcement responsibility  shall  submit
to the Administrator the  following in-
formation:
  (a) Each State which  has primary en-
forcement responsibility  shall  submit
quarterly reports  to the Administrator
on a  schedule  and in a  format pre-
scribed  by  the  Administrator,  con-
sisting of the following information:
  (1)  New violations by  public water
systems in the State  during the pre-
vious  quarter  of  State   regulations
adopted  to  incorporate   the  require-
ments of  national primary drinking
water regulations, including violations
of the public notification requirements
                                     577

-------
§142.15
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
under  Subpart Q  of Part 141 of this
chapter;
  (2) New enforcement actions taken by
the State during the previous quarter
against public water systems with re-
spect to  State regulations adopted to
incorporate the requirements of  na-
tional  primary drinking water regula-
tions;
  (3) Notification of any new variance
or exemption granted during the pre-
vious quarter. The notice shall include
a statement of reasons for the granting
of the variance or exemption, including
documentation of the need for the vari-
ance or exemption and the finding that
the granting of the variance or exemp-
tion will not result in an unreasonable
risk to health. The State may  use a
single notification statement to report
two  or more similar variances or ex-
emptions.
  (b) Each State which has primary en-
forcement  responsibility shall submit
annual reports to the Administrator on
a schedule and in a format prescribed
by the Administrator, consisting of the
following information:
  (1) All additions or corrections to the
State's inventory of public  water sys-
tems;
  (2) A summary of the status of each
variance and exemption  currently in
effect.
  (c) Special  reports.  (1)  Surface  Water
Treatment Rule. (i)(A) A list identifying
the name,  PWS identification number
and date of the determination for each
public  water system supplied by a sur-
face water source  or  a  ground water
source under the  direct influence of
surface water, which the State has de-
termined is not required to provide fil-
tration treatment.
  (B) A list identifying the name  and
PWS identification number  of each
public  water system supplied by a sur-
face water source  or ground water
source under the  direct influence of
surface water, which the State has de-
termined, based on an  evaluation of
site-specific  considerations,  has  no
means of having a  sample transported
and  analyzed for  HPC by a  certified
laboratory under  the requisite time
and  temperature conditions  specified
in §141.74(a)(3) and is  providing ade-
quate  disinfection  in the distribution
system, regardless of whether the sys-
tem is in compliance with the criteria
of §141.72 (a)(4)(i)  or (b)(3)(i) of this
chapter,  as allowed by §141.72 (a)(4)(ii)
and (b)(3)(ii). The list must include the
effective date of each determination.
  (ii) Notification within 60 days of the
end of the calendar quarter of any de-
termination that a public water system
using  a  surface  water  source  or a
ground water source under the direct
influence of  surface  water is not re-
quired to provide filtration treatment.
The notification must include a state-
ment describing the  system's compli-
ance  with each  requirement of  the
State's  regulations  that implement
§141.71 and a summary of comments, if
any, received from the  public on  the
determination. A  single notification
may be  used to  report  two  or  more
such determinations.
  (2) Total conforms.  A  list  of public
water  systems which the State  is al-
lowing to monitor less frequently than
once per month for community water
systems  or  less frequently than once
per quarter for non-community water
systems  as  provided in  §141.21(a), in-
cluding the effective date of bhe re-
duced monitoring requirement for each
system.
  (3) [Reserved]
  (4) States shall report quarterly, in a
format and on a schedule prescribed by
the Administrator, the following infor-
mation related to each system's com-
pliance with  the treatment techniques
for lead and copper under 40  CFR part
141, subpart I during the  preceding cal-
endar  quarter.  Specifically, States
shall report as follows:
  (i) For any reports provided prior to
May 15,  2000, States shall report  the
name and PWS identification number:
  (A) Bach public water  system which
exceeded the  lead  and  copper action
levels and the date upon which the ex-
ceedance occurred;
  (B)  Each  public water  system  re-
quired to complete the corrosion con-
trol evaluation specified in  §141.82(c)
and the date  the State received the re-
sults of the evaluations from each sys-
tem;
  (C)  Each  public  water  system  for
which the State has designated optimal
corrosion  control   treatment  under
§141.82(d), the  date  of the determina-
tion, and each system that completed
                                    578

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.15
installation  of treatment as certified
under §141.90(c)(3);
  (D) Each  public  water system for
which the State has designated optimal
water    quality   parameters   under
§141.82(f)  and the  date of the  deter-
mination;
  (E) Each public water system which
the State has required to install source
water treatment under §141.83(b)(2), the
date of  the  determination, and each
system that  completed installation of
treatment    as     certified    under
§141.90(d)(2);
  (F) Each  public  water system for
which  the State has  specified  max-
imum  permissible source water levels
under §141.83(b)(4); and
  (G) Each  public  water system re-
quired to begin replacing  lead  service
lines as specified in  §141.84, each public
water system for which the State has
established  a  replacement  schedule
under  §141.84(f),  and each  system re-
porting  compliance with  its replace-
ment schedule under §141.90(e)(2).
  (ii) For  any reports provided  after
May 14, 2000 and  before  January  14,
2002, States  may report in accordance
with   either paragraph  (c)(4)(i)  or
(c)(4)(iii) of this section.
  (iii) For all reports submitted on or
after January 14, 2002, States shall re-
port the PWS identification number of
each public water system identified in
paragraphs (c)(4)(iii)(A) through (F) of
this section.
  (A) For each large and medium-size
public water  system, all 90th percentile
lead levels calculated during each mon-
itoring  period  specified in  §141.86 of
this chapter,  and the first and last day
of the monitoring period for which the
90th percentile  lead  level   was cal-
culated;
  (B) For each  small public water sys-
tem, the 90th percentile lead level cal-
culated during  each monitoring period
in which the system exceeds the lead
action level,  and the first and last day
of each monitoring period in  which an
exceedance occurred;
  (C) For each public water system (re-
gardless  of  size), the  90th  percentile
copper  level calculated  during  each
monitoring period in which the system
exceeds  the  copper action level,  and
the first  and last  day of each  moni-
toring period in which an exceedance
occurred;
  (D) For each public water system for
which the State  has designated optimal
water   quality   parameters   under
§141.82(f) of this chapter,  or which the
State has deemed to have optimized
corrosion control under §141.81(b)(l) or
(b)(3) of this chapter, the date of the
determination  and  the   paragraph(s)
under which the State made its deter-
mination;
  (E) For each public water system re-
quired to begin replacing lead  service
lines as specified in §141.84 of this chap-
ter  and the date  each  system must
begin replacement; and
  (F) For  each public water  system
that  has implemented  optimal corro-
sion  control,   completed  applicable
source  water treatment  requirements
pursuant to §141.83 of this chapter and/
or completed lead service line replace-
ment requirements pursuant to §141.84
of this  chapter,  and the date  of the
State's  determination that these re-
quirements have been met. The date re-
ported  shall be  the latest of the  fol-
lowing events:
  (7) The date the State designates op-
timal water quality parameters under
§141.82(f) of this chapter  or deems the
system   to  have  optimized corrosion
control   pursuant  to §141.81(b)(l)  or
(b)(3) of this chapter;
  (2) For systems triggered into source
water treatment,  the date  the State
designates   maximum    permissible
source water levels under §141.83(b)(4)
of this chapter or  determines pursuant
to  §141.83(b)(2)  of this   chapter  that
source water treatment is not required;
or
  (3)  For systems  triggered into lead
service  line replacement, the date the
system  completes lead service line re-
placement or becomes eligible to cease
lead service line replacement pursuant
to §141.84(f) of this chapter.
  (5) Sanitary surveys. A list of subpart
H  systems  that have had a sanitary
survey  completed during the previous
year and an annual evaluation of the
State's  program for  conducting sani-
tary surveys under §142.16(b)(3)  of this
chapter.
  (d)  The reports  submitted  pursuant
to this section shall be made available
                                     579

-------
§142.16
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
by the  State  to  the  public for inspec-
tion at one or more locations within
the State.

[41 FR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 43
PR 5373, Feb. 8, 1978; 54 PR 27539, June 29,
1989;  55 FR 52140, Dec. 20, 1989; 55 PR 25065,
June 19,  1990; 56 PR 3595, Jan. 30, 1991; 56 FR
26562, June 7, 1991;  63 FR 69520, Dec. 16, 1998;
64 FR 50620, Sept. 17, 1999; 65 FR 2014, Jan. 12,
2000;  65 FR 20313, Apr. 14, 2000; 65 FR 26048,
May  4, 2000; 66 FR 3780, Jan. 16, 2001]

§ 142.16  Special primacy requirements.
  (a) State  public  notification  require-
ments.
  (1) Each  State that has primary  en-
forcement  authority  under  this part
must submit   complete and final  re-
quests  for approval  of program revi-
sions to adopt the requirements of Sub-
part Q of Part 141 of this chapter, using
the procedures in § 142.12(b) through  (d).
At its option,  a State may, by rule,  and
after notice and comment, establish al-
ternative public notification require-
ments with respect  to the  form  and
content of the public  notice required
under  Subpart  Q of Part  141 of this
chapter. The  alternative requirements
must  provide  the  same  type   and
amount of information required under
Subpart Q  and must  meet the primacy
requirements  under §142.10.
  (2) As part  of the revised primacy
program, a State must also establish
enforceable requirements and  proce-
dures  when  the State  adds  to  or
changes the requirements under:
  (i)  Table 1  to  40 CFR 141.201 (a)(Item
(3)(v))—To  require public  water sys-
tems to give  a public notice for viola-
tions or situations  other  than  those
listed in Appendix A of Subpart Q of
Part 141 of this chapter;
  (ii) 40 CFR 141.201(c)(2)—To allow pub-
lic water systems, under the  specific
circumstances listed in §141.201(c)(2), to
limit the distribution of the public  no-
tice  to persons served by the portion of
the distribution  system that is out of
compliance;
  (iii) Table 1  of 40 CFR 141.202(a) (Items
(5),   (6), and   (8))—To  require  public
water systems to give a Tier 1 public
notice (rather than a Tier 2 or Tier  3
notice)  for violations or situations list-
ed in Appendix A of Subpart Q of Part
141 of this chapter;
  (iv) 40 CFR 141.202(b)(3)—To  require
public water systems to comply with
additional Tier 1 public notification re-
quirements set by the State subsequent
to the initial 24-hour Tier 1 notice,  as
a result of their consultation with the
State required under §§141.202(b)(2);
  (v)  40  CFR 141.202(c), 141.203(c)  and
141.204(c)—To require a  different form
and manner of delivery for Tier 1, 2 and
3 public notices.
  (vi) Table  1 to 40 CFR  141.203(a) (Item
(2))—To require  the  public water  sys-
tems to provide  a Tier 2 public notice
(rather than Tier (3)) for monitoring or
testing procedure violations specified
by the State;
  (vii) 40 CFR  141.203(b)(l)—To grant
public water systems an extension up
to three months for distributing the
Tier 2 public notice in appropriate cir-
cumstances  (other than those  specifi-
cally excluded in the rule);
  (viii) 40 CFR 141.203(b)(2)—To  grant a
different repeat notice  frequency  for
the Tier 2 public notice in appropriate
circumstances  (other than those  spe-
cifically excluded in the rule), but no
less frequently than once per year;
  (ix) 40 CFR 141.203(b)(3)—To respond
within 24 hours  to  a request  for con-
sultation by the public water system to
determine  whether a  Tier 1  (rather
than a Tier 2) notice is required for a
turbidity    MCL   violation    under
§141.13(b) or a SWTR/IESWTR TT  vio-
lation due to a single exceedance of the
maximum allowable turbidity limit;
  (x)  40  CFR  141.205(c)—To  determine
the specific multilingual  requirement
for a public water system, including de-
fining "large proportion of non-English-
speaking consumers."
  (b) Requirements for States to adopt 40
CFR part 141, subpart H Filtration and
Disinfection. In addition  to the  general
primacy  requirements   enumerated
elsewhere in this part, including the re-
quirement that State provisions are no
less stringent than the federal require-
ments, an application for approval of a
State program revision  that adopts  40
CFR part 141, subpart H Filtration and
Disinfection, must  contain  the infor-
mation specified in  this paragraph (b),
except that  States which require with-
out exception all public water sjrstems
using  a surface water  source or  a
ground water source under  the direct
                                     580

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.16
influence of surface water to  provide
filtration need not demonstrate that
the State program has provisions that
apply to systems which do not provide
filtration  treatment.  However,  such
States  must  provide  the text of the
State  statutes or  regulations which
specifies that all public water systems
using  a  surface  water source  or  a
ground water source under the direct
influence of surface water must provide
filtration.
  (1) Enforceable requirements, (i) In ad-
dition  to adopting  criteria  no  less
stringent than those specified in part
141,  subpart  H  of  this chapter,  the
State's application must include en-
forceable design and operating  criteria
for  each  filtration  treatment tech-
nology allowed or  a procedure for  es-
tablishing design and operating condi-
tions on a system-by-system basis (e.g.,
a permit system).
  (ii) States must have the appropriate
rules or other authority to assure that
PWSs respond in writing to significant
deficiencies outlined in sanitary survey
reports required under paragraph (b)(3)
of this section no later than  45 days
after receipt of the report, indicating
how and on what schedule the system
will   address   significant deficiencies
noted in the survey.
  (iii)  States  must  have  the appro-
priate rules or other authority to as-
sure that PWSs take necessary steps to
address significant deficiencies identi-
fied in sanitary survey reports required
under  paragraph (b)(3)  of this section,
if such deficiencies are within the con-
trol of the PWS and its governing body.
  (2) State practices or procedures, (i) A
State application for program revision
approval must include a description of
how the State will accomplish  the fol-
lowing:
  (A) Section  141.70(c) (qualification of
operators)—Qualify  operators  of sys-
tems using a surface water source or a
ground water source under the direct
influence of surface water.
  (B) Determine which systems using a
ground water  source are under the  di-
rect influence of surface water by June
29, 1994 for community  water systems
and by June 29, 1999 for non-community
water systems.
  (C) Section 141.72(b)(l)  (achieving re-
quired  Giardia  lamblia  and virus re-
moval in filtered systems)—Determine
that  the  combined  treatment  process
incorporating  disinfection  treatment
and  filtration  treatment  will  achieve
the required removal and/or inactiva-
tion of Giardia lamblia and viruses.
  (D) Section 141.74(a) (State approval
of parties  to  conduct  analyses)—ap-
prove parties to conduct pH, tempera-
ture,  turbidity, and residual disinfect-
ant concentration measurements.
  (E)  Determine appropriate filtration
treatment technology  for source wa-
ters of various qualities.
  (ii)  For a  State which  does  not re-
quire all public water systems  using a
surface water source or ground water
source  under the direct  influence of
surface  water to   provide filtration
treatment, a State application  for pro-
gram revision approval must include a
description  of  how  the  State  will ac-
complish the following:
  (A)   Section  141.71(b)(2)  (watershed
control program)—Judge the adequacy
of watershed control programs.
  (B)  Section 141.71(b)(3)  (approval of
on-site inspectors)—Approve on-site in-
spectors other than  State personnel
and evaluate the results of on-site in-
spections.
  (iii) For a State which adopts any of
the following discretionary elements of
part 141 of this chapter, the application
must describe how the State will:
  (A)  Section 141.72 (interim disinfec-
tion requirements)—Determine  interim
disinfection  requirements for unfil-
tered systems which the State  has de-
termined must filter which will be in
effect until filtration is installed.
  (B)   Section  141.72   (a)(4)(ii)  and
(b)(3)(ii) (determination   of  adequate
disinfection  in system without  dis-
infectant residual)—Determine  that a
system is unable to measure HPC but
is still providing  adequate disinfection
in the distribution system, as  allowed
by §141.72(a)(4)(ii) for systems which do
not provide  filtration  treatment  and
§141.72(b)(3)(ii)  for  systems which do
provide filtration treatment.
  (C) Section 141.73 (a)(l) and (b)(l) (al-
ternative turbidity  limit)—Determine
whether an  alternative turbidity limit
is appropriate  and what  the  level
should be as allowed by §141.73(a)(l) for
a system using conventional filtration
treatment or direct  filtration  and by
                                     581

-------
§142.16
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§141.73(b)(l) for a  system  using slow
sand filtration.
  (D) Section 141.73(d) (alternative  fil-
tration technologies)—Determine that
a  public  water   system  has  dem-
onstrated that an  alternate filtration
technology, in combination with dis-
infection treatment, achieves adequate
removal and/or disinfection of Giardia
lamblia and viruses.
  (E) Section  141.74(a)(5) (alternate  an-
alytical method for chlorine)—Approve
DPD colorimetric test kits for free and
combined chlorine measurement or  ap-
prove  calibration  of automated meth-
ods by the Indigo Method for ozone  de-
termination.
  (F) Section 141.74 (b)(2) and (c)(l) (ap-
proval of continuous  turbidity moni-
toring)—Approve continuous turbidity
monitoring, as allowed by §141.74(b)(2)
for a public water system  which does
not  provide  filtration  treatment and
§141.74(c)(l) for a  system which does
provide filtration treatment.
  (G) Section 141.74 (b)(6)(i) and (c)(3)(i)
(approval of alternate disinfectant  re-
sidual concentration sampling plans)—
Approve alternate disinfectant residual
concentration sampling plans  for sys-
tems which have  a combined ground
water  and  surface water  or  ground
water  and ground water under the  di-
rect influence of a surface water dis-
tribution   system,   as  allowed  by
§141.74(b)(6)(i) for  a public  water sys-
tem which does not provide filtration
treatment and §141.74(c)(3)(i) for a pub-
lic  water system  which  does  provide
filtration treatment.
  (H) Section 141.74(c)(l)  (reduction of
turbidity  monitoring)—Decide  whether
to allow reduction of turbidity moni-
toring for systems  using slow  sand  fil-
tration, an approved alternate filtra-
tion technology or serving 500 people or
fewer.
  (I)   Section  141.75  (a)(2)(ix)  and
(b)(2)(iv)  (reduced  reporting)—Deter-
mine whether reduced reporting is  ap-
propriate, as allowed by §141.75(a)(2)(ix)
for a public water system  which does
not  provide  filtration  treatment and
§141.75(b)(2)(iv) for  a public water sys-
tem  which  does  provide  filtration
treatment.
  (iv) For a State  which does not  re-
quire all public water systems using a
surface water source or ground water
source under the  direct influence  of
surface  water  to  provide  filtration
treatment and which uses  any of the
following discretionary provisions, the
application  must  describe  how  the
State will:
  (A)  Section  141.71(a)(2)(i)  (source
water  turbidity requirements)—Deter-
mine that an exceedance of turbidity
limits in source water was  caused by
circumstances  that were unusual  and
unpredictable.
  (B) Section  141.71(b)(l)(i) (monthly
CT compliance requirements)—Deter-
mine whether failure to  meet the  re-
quirements for monthly CT compliance
in  §141.72(a)(l) was  caused  by  cir-
cumstances that were unusual and un-
predictable.
  (C) Section 141.71(b)(l)(iii) (residual
disinfectant   concentration   require-
ments)—Determine whether failure  to
meet the requirements for residual dis-
infectant concentration  entering  the
distribution  system  in  §141.72(a)(3)(i)
was caused by circumstances that were
unusual and unpredictable.
  (D) Section 141.71(b)(l)(iv) (distribu-
tion system  disinfectant  residual con-
centration   requirements)—Determine
whether  failure to  meet the  require-
ments for distribution system  residual
disinfectant      concentration      in
§141.72(a)(4) was related to a deficiency
in treatment.
  (E) Section 141.71(b)(4) (system modi-
fication to prevent waterborne disease
outbreak)—Determine that  a  system,
after having been  identified as  the
source of  a waterborne  disease out-
break, has  been modified sufficiently
to prevent another such occurrence.
  (F) Section 141.71(b)(5) (total coliform
MCL)—Determine whether a total coli-
form MCL violation was caused by a
deficiency in treatment.
  (G) Section 141.72(a)(l) (disinfection
requirements)—Determine   that   dif-
ferent ozone, chloramine, or chlorine
dioxide CT999 values or conditions are
adequate to  achieve  required disinfec-
tion.
  (H) Section 141.72(a)(2)(ii) (shut-off of
water to  distribution system)—Deter-
mine whether a shut-off of water to the
distribution system when the disinfect-
ant residual concentration entering the
distribution system is less than 0.2 rag/
                                     582

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.16
1 will cause an unreasonable risk to
health or interfere with fire protection.
  (I) Section 141.74(b)(l) (coliform mon-
itoring)—Determine   that   coliform
monitoring which otherwise might be
required is not feasible for a system.
  (J)  Section 141.74(ta), table 3.1 (dis-
infection  with  chloramines)—Deter-
mine the conditions to be met to insure
99.99  percent removal and/or inactiva-
tion of viruses in systems which use ei-
ther   preformed   chloramines   or
chloramines for  which  ammonia is
added to the water before chlorine, as
allowed by table 3.1.
  (3) Sanitary survey. In addition to the
general requirements for sanitary  sur-
veys  contained  in §142.10(b)(2),  an ap-
plication must describe how the State
will implement  a sanitary survey pro-
gram that meets the  requirements in
paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through  (v)  of  this
section.  For the purposes of this para-
graph, "sanitary survey" means an on-
site review of the water source (identi-
fying sources of contamination using
results   of  source  water  assessments
where available), facilities, equipment,
operation,   maintenance,  and   moni-
toring compliance  of a  public  water
system to evaluate the adequacy of the
system,  its sources and operations  and
the distribution of safe drinking water.
  (i) The State  must conduct sanitary
surveys  for all  surface water systems
(including  groundwater  under the in-
fluence)  that address the eight sanitary
survey   components  listed  in  para-
graphs (b)(3)(i)(A) through  (H)  of this
section  no less  frequently than every
three years for community systems
and no less frequently than  every  five
years for noncommunity  systems. The
State may allow sanitary surveys con-
ducted after December 1995 to serve as
the first set of required  sanitary sur-
veys  if  the surveys address the eight
sanitary survey  components listed in
paragraphs  (b)(3)(i)(A) through  (H) of
this section.
  (A)  Source.
  (B) Treatment.
  (C) Distribution system.
  (D)  Finished water storage.
  (E)  Pumps, pump facilities, and con-
trols.
  (F)  Monitoring and  reporting  and
data verification.
  (G) System management  and oper-
ation.
  (H) Operator compliance with State
requirements.
  (ii) For  community  systems  deter-
mined  by  the   State  to  have out-
standing performance  based on prior
sanitary surveys, subsequent sanitary
surveys may be conducted no less than
every five  years. In its primacy appli-
cation,  the State must describe how it
will decide whether a system has out-
standing performance and is thus eligi-
ble for  sanitary  surveys  at a reduced
frequency.
  (iii) Components of a  sanitary survey
may be completed  as part of a staged
or phased  state review process within
the established frequency.
  (iv) When  conducting  sanitary sur-
veys  for systems required to comply
with the disinfection profiling require-
ments in §141.172 of this chapter, the
State must also review  the disinfection
profile as part of the sanitary survey.
  (v)  In its  primacy application,  the
State must describe how  it will  decide
whether a  deficiency identified during
a sanitary  survey is significant for the
purposes of paragraph (b)(l)(ii) of this
section.
  (c) Total coliform requirements. In addi-
tion to meeting  the general primacy
requirements of this part, an applica-
tion for approval of a State program
revision that adopts the  requirements
of the national primary drinking water
regulation  for total  coliforms must
contain the following information:
  (1) The application must describe the
State's  plan for  determining whether
sample  siting plans  are acceptable (in-
cluding periodic  reviews), as required
by§141.21(a)(l).
  (2)  The  national  primary drinking
water regulation  for total coliforms in
part  141 gives States  the  option  to
impose  lesser requirements  in certain
circumstances, which are listed below.
If  a State  chooses to exercise  any of
these options, its application for appro-
val of a program  revision must include
the information listed below (the State
need only provide the information list-
ed for those options it has  chosen to
use).
  (i) Section 141.21(a)(2)  (Reduced moni-
toring  requirements for community
water systems serving 1,000 or fewer
                                     583

-------
§142.16
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
persons)—A  description  of  how  the
State will  determine whether it is ap-
propriate to  reduce the total coliform
monitoring frequency for such systems
using the  criteria in §141.21(a)(2)  and
how it  will determine  the revised fre-
quency.
  (ii) Section  141.21(a)(3)(i)  (Reduced
monitoring requirements for  non-com-
munity  water systems using-  ground
water  and serving  1,000 persons  or
fewer)—A description of how the State
will determine  whether it  is appro-
priate  to  reduce  the  total  coliform
monitoring frequency for such systems
using the criteria in §141.21(a)(3)(i) and
how it  will determine  the revised fre-
quency.
  (iii) Section 141.21(a)(3)(ii)  (Reduced
monitoring for  non-community water
systems using ground water and serv-
ing  more  than  1,000 persons)—A de-
scription of how the State will deter-
mine whether it is appropriate to re-
duce the total coliform monitoring fre-
quency  for non-community water sys-
tems using only ground water and serv-
ing more than 1,000 persons during any
month the system serves 1,000  persons
or fewer and how it will determine the
revised  frequency.
  (iv) Section 141.21(a)(5) (Waiver of
time  limit for  sampling after a tur-
bidity  sampling  result   exceeds  1
NTU)—A description of how the State
will determine  whether it  is appro-
priate to waive the 24-hour time limit.
  (v)  Section  141.21(b)(l) (Waiver  of
time  limit for repeat samples)—A de-
scription of how the State will deter-
mine whether it is appropriate to waive
the 24-hour time limit  and how it will
determine  what the revised time limit
will be.
  (vi) Section 141.21(b)(3)  (Alternative
repeat  monitoring requirements  for
systems with a single  service  connec-
tion)—A description  of how the State
will determine  whether it  is appro-
priate to allow a system with a single
service  connection to  use  an alter-
native  repeat monitoring scheme, as
provided in §141.21(b)(3), and  what the
alternative requirements will  be.
  (vii) Section 141.21(b)(5) (Waiver of re-
quirement  to take  five  routine samples
the month after a system has a total
coliform-positive  sample)—A  descrip-
tion of how the State will determine
whether it is appropriate to waive the
requirement for certain systems to col-
lect  five  routine  samples  during the
next month it serves water to the pub-
lic, using the criteria in §141.21(b)(5).
  (viii)  Section 141.21(c)  (Invalidation
of total coliform-positive samples)—A
description of how the State will deter-
mine whether it is appropriate  to in-
validate a total coliform-positive sam-
ple, using the criteria in §141.21(c).
  (ix) Section  141.21(d) (Sanitary sur-
veys)—A description  of the State's cri-
teria and  procedures for  approving
agents  other than  State personnel to
conduct sanitary surveys.
  (x)  Section  141.21(e)(2)  (Waiver   of
fecal coliform  or E.  coli testing on a
total coliform-positive sample)—A de-
scription  of how the State will  deter-
mine whether it is appropriate to waive
fecal coliform  or E.  coli testing on a
total coliform-positive sample.
  (d) Requirements for States to adopt
40 CFR  part 141, subpart I—Control  of
Lead and Copper.  An  application for
approval of a State  program revision
which adopts the requirements  speci-
fied in 40 CFR part  141, subpart I, must
contain (in addition to the general pri-
macy requirements  enumerated else-
where in  this  part,  including the re-
quirement that State regulations be at
least as stringent  as the  federal re-
quirements) a  description  of how the
State will  accomplish  the following
program requirements:
  (1) Section 141.82—State  designation
of optimal corrosion control.
  (i) Sections  141.82(d),  141.82(f),  and
141.82(h)—Designating optimal   corro-
sion control treatment methods, opti-
mal  water  quality  parameters,  and
modifications thereto.
  (ii) Section 141.82(g)—Designabing an
alternative  approach for aggregating
multiple measurements collected dur-
ing the same day for a water quality
parameter at a sampling  location,  if
the  State elects to  adopt a  formula
other   than  the  one   specified   in
§141.82(g)(l) of this chapter.
  (2)    Sections     141.83(b)(2)    and
141.83(b)(4)—Designating  source  water
treatment methods, maximum permis-
sible source water  levels for lead and
copper and modifications thereto.
                                     584

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.16
  (3)  Section 141.90(e)—Verifying com-
pliance with lead service line replace-
ment schedules and  completion of all
partial lead service  line  replacement
activities.
  (4)  Section 141.86(d)(4)(iv)(A)—Desig-
nating an alternative period for sample
collection for community water  sys-
tems subject to reduced monitoring.
  (e)  An application  for approval  of a
State  program revision which  adopts
the requirements specified in §§141.11,
141.23, 141.24, 141.32,  141.40,  141.61  and
141.62 for a  newly regulated contami-
nant must contain the following (in ad-
dition to the general primacy require-
ments enumerated  elsewhere  in  this
part,  including the  requirement  that
State regulations be at least as strin-
gent as the federal requirements):
  (1) If a State chooses  to issue waivers
from  the monitoring requirements in
§§141.23 and  141.24, the State shall de-
scribe  the  procedures  and  criteria
which it will use  to  review waiver ap-
plications  and issue waiver determina-
tions.
  (i) The procedures  for each contami-
nant or class of contaminants shall in-
clude a description of:
  (A) The  waiver application require-
ments;
  (B) The State review process for "use"
waivers and for "susceptibility" waiv-
ers; and
  (C)  The  State decision  criteria, in-
cluding the factors that will be consid-
ered in deciding to grant or deny waiv-
ers. The decision criteria must  include
the  factors  specified  in  §§ 141.24(f)(8)
and 141.24(h)(6).
  (ii) The State must specify the moni-
toring data  and other documentation
required to demonstrate that the  con-
taminant is  eligible  for a "use"  and/or
"susceptibility" waiver.
  (2) A monitoring plan for the  initial
monitoring period by which the State
will  assure all  systems complete  the
required initial monitoring within the
regulatory deadlines.
  NOTE: States may update their monitoring-
plan submitted under the Phase II Rule or
simply note in their application that  they
will use the same monitoring plan  for the
Phase V Rule.
  (i) The initial monitoring plan must
describe how systems will be scheduled
during the initial monitoring  period
and  demonstrate  that the analytical
workload on certified laboratories for
each of the three years has been taken
into account, to assure that the State's
plan will  result in a  high degree  of
monitoring compliance  and that as a
result  there is a high  probability  of
compliance and will be updated as nec-
essary.
  (ii) The State must demonstrate that
the initial monitoring plan is enforce-
able under State law.
  (f) Consumer Confidence Report require-
ments.  (1) Each State that has primary
enforcement responsibility must adopt
the requirements of 40  CFR part 141,
subpart O no later than August 21, 2000.
States must submit revised programs
to EPA  for approval using the proce-
dures in §142.12(b) through (d).
  (2) Each State that has primary en-
forcement responsibility  must  make
reports  submitted  to  the  States  in
compliance with  40  CPR  141.155(c)
available to the public upon request.
  (3) Each State that has primary en-
forcement responsibility  must  main-
tain a  copy of the reports for  a period
of one year and the certifications ob-
tained pursuant to 40 CFR 141.155(c) for
a period of 5 years.
  (4) Each State that has primary en-
forcement responsibility must report
violations of this subpart in accordance
with the requirements of §142.15(a)(l).
  (g) Requirements for States to  adopt  40
CFR part 141, Subpart P—Enhanced Fil-
tration and Disinfection—Systems Serving
10,000 or More People. In addition to the
general primacy requirements  enumer-
ated elsewhere in this part, including
the requirement that  State provisions
are no less stringent than the Federal
requirements,   an application  for ap-
proval  of a State program revision that
adopts 40 CFR  part  141,  Subpart P En-
hanced Filtration  and  Disinfection—
Systems Serving 10,000 or More People,
must contain the information specified
in this paragraph:
  (1) Enforceable requirements.  States
must have the  appropriate  rules or
other  authority to  require PWSs to
conduct  a Composite  Correction Pro-
gram (CCP) and to  assure that PWSs
implement any  followup recommenda-
tions that result as part  of the  CCP.
The  CCP consists of two  elements—a
                                     585

-------
§142.16
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Comprehensive  Performance  Evalua-
tion (CPE)  and Comprehensive  Tech-
nical Assistance (CTA).  A  CPE is  a
thorough  review  and  analysis   of  a
plant's  performance-based capabilities
and  associated  administrative,   oper-
ation and maintenance practices. It is
conducted to identify factors that may
be adversely impacting a plant's capa-
bility to achieve compliance and em-
phasizes approaches that can be imple-
mented without significant capital im-
provements. A CTA is the performance
improvement  phase  that   is  imple-
mented if the CPE  results indicate im-
proved  performance potential. During
the CTA phase,  the system must iden-
tify  and systematically address  plant-
specific factors.  The CTA is a combina-
tion of utilizing CPE results as a basis
for  followup,   implementing  process
control priority-setting techniques and
maintaining long-term involvement to
systematically train staff and adminis-
trators.
  (2) State practices  or procedures, (i)
Section 141.172(a)(3)  of this chapter-
How the State will  approve a more rep-
resentative  annual  data set than the
data  set determined  under  §141.172
(a)(l) or (2) of this  chapter for the pur-
pose of determining applicability of the
requirements  of §141.172 of  this chap-
ter.
  (ii) Section  141.172(b)(5) of this chap-
ter—How  the  State  will  approve  a
method to calculate the  logs  of inac-
tivation for viruses for a system that
uses either  chloramines  or ozone for
primary disinfection.
  (iii)  Section 141.172(c) of  this  chap-
ter—How  the State will  consult with
PWSs to evaluate modifications to dis-
infection practice.
  (iv) Section 141.173(b) of  this  chap-
ter—For filtration  technologies  other
than conventional  filtration   treat-
ment,  direct filtration, slow sand fil-
tration, or  diatomaceous earth  filtra-
tion, how the State will determine that
a public water system may use a  filtra-
tion  technology  if the  PWS   dem-
onstrates to  the  State,  using  pilot
plant studies or other means, that the
alternative  filtration  technology, in
combination  with   disinfection  treat-
ment that meets  the requirements of
§141.172(b) of this chapter,  consistently
achieves 99.9 percent removal and/or in-
activation of Giardia lamblia cysts and
99.99 percent removal and/or inactiva-
tion of viruses, and 99 percent removal
of Cryptospondium oocysts. For a  sys-
tem that  makes  this  demonstration,
how the State will  set turbidity  per-
formance requirements that the  sys-
tem must meet 95 percent of the time
and that the system may not exceed at
any time at a level  that  consistently
achieves 99.9 percent removal and/or in-
activation of Giardia lamblia cysts, 99.99
percent removal and/or inactivation of
viruses,  and  99  percent  removal of
Cryptosporidium oocysts.
  (h) Requirements for States to adopt 40
CFR part 141, subpart L. In addition to
the general primacy requirements else-
where  in this  part,  including the re-
quirement that State regulations be at
least as stringent  as federal require-
ments, an application for approval of a
State program revision that adopts 40
CFR part 141, subpart L, must contain
a description of how  the State will ac-
complish the  following program re-
quirements:
  (1) Section 141.64(b)(2) of this chapter
(interim treatment requirements). De-
termine  any  interim  treatment re-
quirements for those systems electing
to install GAC or membrane filtration
and granted additional time  to comply
with §141.64 of this chapter.
  (2) Section 141.130(c)  of  this chapter
(qualification of operators). Qualify op-
erators of public water systems subject
to 40 CFR part 141,  subpart L. Quali-
fication  requirements  established for
operators of systems  subject to 40 CFR
part 141, subpart H—Filtration and Dis-
infection may  be used in  whole or in
part to establish  operator qualification
requirements for meeting  40 CFR part
141,  subpart  L  requirements  if  the
State determines that the  40 CFR part
141, subpart H requirements  are appro-
priate  and applicable for meeting  sub-
part L requirements.
  (3) Section 141.131(c)(2) of  this chap-
ter (DPD colorimetric test  kits). Ap-
prove DPD colorimetric test kits for
free and total chlorine measurements.
State    approval    granted    under
§141.74(a)(2) of this chapter for the use
of DPD colorimetric test  kits for free
chlorine testing  is acceptable for the
use of DPD test kits  in measuring free
                                     586

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.16
chlorine residuals as  required  in 40
CFR part 141, subpart L.
  (4)  Sections  141.131(0(3)  and  (d) of
this chapter (State approval of parties
to conduct analyses). Approve parties
to conduct pH, bromide, alkalinity, and
residual   disinfectant   concentration
measurements. The State's process for
approving  parties performing  water
quality measurements for systems sub-
ject to 40  CPR part 141, subpart H re-
quirements in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(D) of
this section may be used for approving
parties measuring water  quality  pa-
rameters  for systems  subject to sub-
part L requirements, if the State deter-
mines the process is appropriate  and
applicable.
  (5) Section 141.132(a)(2) of this chap-
ter (multiple wells as a single source).
Define the criteria to use to determine
if multiple wells are being drawn from
a single aquifer and  therefore be con-
sidered a single source for  compliance
with monitoring requirements.
  (6) Approve alternate minimum TOO
removal (Step  2)  requirements,  as al-
lowed   under    the    provisions   of
§141.135(b)  of this chapter.
  (i) Requirements  for States to  adopt 40
CFR part 141, §141.76 Recycle provisions.
In addition to the general primacy re-
quirements enumerated elsewhere in
this part,  including  the requirement
that the State  provisions are no  less
stringent  than  the  federal   require-
ments, an application for approval  of a
State program revision that adopts 40
CFR  part  141,  §141.76  Recycle Provi-
sions must contain  the  information
specified in this paragraph:
  (1)  State practices  or  procedures,  (i)
Section  141.76(d)  of  this  chapter-
States must have the proper rules  and
authority  to  use Sanitary  Surveys,
comprehensive   performance   evalua-
tions  (CPEs),  other  inspections,  or
other  activities  to   evaluate  recycle
data  maintained  by  systems  under
§141.76(d)  of this  chapter  and require
modifications to recycle practices.
  (ii) [Reserved]
  (2) [Reserved]
  (j) Requirements for  States to  adopt 40
CFR part 141, Subpart T—Enhanced  Fil-
tration and Disinfection—Systems Serving
Fewer than 10,000 People. In  addition to
the general primacy requirements enu-
merated elsewhere in this part, includ-
ing the requirement  that  State provi-
sions are no  less  stringent than the
Federal  requirements,  an  application
for approval of a State program  revi-
sion that adopts 40 CFR part 141,  Sub-
part T  Enhanced Filtration  and Dis-
infection—Systems Serving Fewer than
10,000 People, must contain the infor-
mation specified in this paragraph:
  (1)  Enforceable  requirements.  States
must have rules or other authority to
require   systems to  participate  in  a
Comprehensive  Technical  Assistance
(CTA)  activity,  the  performance  im-
provement phase of the Composite Cor-
rection   Program  (COP).   The  State
must determine  whether a CTA must
be conducted based on results of a CPE
which indicate  the potential  for  im-
proved performance,  and a finding by
the State that the system is able to re-
ceive and implement technical assist-
ance provided through the  CTA. A CPE
is a thorough review  and analysis of a
system's  performance-based  capabili-
ties and  associated administrative, op-
eration  and maintenance practices. It
is conducted  to  identify factors  that
may be adversely impacting a plant's
capability to achieve compliance.  Dur-
ing the  CTA  phase,  the system must
identify  and  systematically  address
factors limiting performance. The  CTA
is a combination of utilizing CPE re-
sults  as  a basis for  follow-up,  imple-
menting  process control  priority-set-
ting techniques and maintaining long-
term  involvement to  systematically
train staff and administrators.
  (2) State practices or procedures, (i)
Section 141.530-141.536—How the State
will approve  a  more representative
data set  for optional  TTHM and HAA5
monitoring and profiling.
  (ii)  Section  141.536  of this chapter-
How the State will approve a method
to calculate the logs of inactivation for
viruses for a  system that uses either
chloramines, ozone, or chlorine dioxide
for primary disinfection.
  (iii) Section 141.542  of this chapter-
How the  State  will consult with the
system and approve significant changes
to disinfection practices.
  (iv) Section 141.552  of this chapter—
For filtration technologies other  than
conventional filtration treatment, di-
rect filtration, slow sand filtration, or
diatomaceous  earth filtration, how the
                                     587

-------
§142.16
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
State  will  determine  that  a  public
water  system may  use  a  filtration
technology if the PWS demonstrates to
the State, using  pilot plant studies or
other means,  that the alternative  fil-
tration  technology,   in   combination
with disinfection treatment that meets
the requirements of  §141.72(b)  of this
chapter, consistently achieves 99.9 per-
cent removal  and/or inactivation of
Giardia lamblia cysts  and 99.99 percent
removal and/or inactivation of viruses,
and    99    percent    removal   of
Cryptosporidium oocysts. For a  system
that makes  this demonstration, how
the State will set turbidity perform-
ance  requirements  that  the  system
must meet 95 percent of the time and
that the system may  not exceed at any
time  at  a  level that   consistently
achieves 99.9 percent removal and/or in-
activation of Giardia lamblia cysts, 99.99
percent removal  and/or inactivation of
viruses,  and  99   percent  removal  of
Cryptosporidium oocysts.
  EDITORIAL NOTE:  At 67 FR 1844,  Jan. 14,
2002, the above  paragraph Q)  was added, ef-
fective Feb. 13, 2002. However, at 66 FR 7066,
Jan 22, 2001, paragraph  (j) had already been
added, effective Jan. 22, 2004. The paragraph
(j) effective Jan. 22, 2004, follows.
  (j) An application  for approval of a
State program revision which adopts
the requirements specified in §§141.11,
141.23,  141.24,  141.32,  141.40,  141.61 and
141.62 for an  existing regulated con-
taminant must  contain the  following
(in addition to the general primacy re-
quirements  enumerated  elsewhere  in
this  part, including  the  requirement
that State regulations be at least as
stringent as the  federal requirements):
  (1) If a State chooses to issue waivers
from the monitoring requirements in
§§141.23,  141.24,  and  141.40,  the  State
shall describe the procedures and cri-
teria which it will use to review waiver
applications  and issue  wavier  deter-
minations. The State shall provide  the
same  information required  in  para-
graph (e)(l)(i) and (ii) of  this section.
States may update their existing waiv-
er criteria or use the  requirements sub-
mitted  under  the National Primary
Drinking Water Regulations for the in-
organic and organic contaminants (i.e.,
Phase II/V rule) in 16(e) of this section.
States may simply note in their appli-
cation any revisions to existing waiver
criteria or note that  the  same proce-
dures to issue waivers will  be used.
  (2) A monitoring plan by which the
State will ensure all systems complete
the required monitoring by the  regu-
latory deadlines.  States  may  update
their  existing monitoring plan or use
the same monitoring plan submitted
under the National Primary  Drinking
Water Regulations for  the inorganic
and organic  contaminants (i.e.  Phase
II/V rule) in 16(e) of this section. States
may simply  note  in  their application
any revisions to an existing monitoring
plan or note  that the same monitoring
plan will be used. The  State must dem-
onstrate  that the  monitoring plan  is
enforceable under State law.
  (k) States establish the initial moni-
toring requirements  for new  systems
and new sources.  States must explain
their  initial  monitoring schedules and
how these monitoring  schedules ensure
that public water systems and sources
comply with MCL's and monitoring re-
quirements.  States must  also  specify
the time frame in which  new systems
will demonstrate compliance with the
MCLs.
  (1)  An application for approval of a
State  program  revision   for   radio-
nuclides  which  adopts  the  require-
ments specified in §141.26(a)(2)(ii)(C)  of
this  chapter must contain  the fol-
lowing (in addition to the  general pri-
macy requirements enumerated in this
part,  including that State regulations
be at least as stringent as the Federal
requirements):
  (1) If a  State chooses to use grand-
fathered data in the manner  described
in §141.26(a)(2)(ii)(C)  of this chapter,
then the State must describe the proce-
dures and criteria which it wil] use to
make these  determinations  (whether
distribution  system   or  entry   point
sampling points are used).
  (i)   The decision  criteria  that the
State will use  to  determine that data
collected in the distribution system are
representative  of the drinking  water
supplied from each entry  point to the
distribution  system. These determina-
tions must consider:
  (A) All previous monitoring da,ta.
  (B) The variation in reported activity
levels.
                                     588

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.17
  (C) Other  factors affecting the rep-
resentativeness of the data (e.g. geol-
ogy).
  (ii) [Reserved]
  (2)  A monitoring plan by which the
State will assure all systems complete
the  required  monitoring  within  the
regulatory deadlines. States may up-
date  their existing monitoring plan or
use  the  same  monitoring plan  sub-
mitted   for   the   requirements   in
§ 142.16(e)(5) under the national primary
drinking  water regulations for the in-
organic and  organic contaminants (i.e.
the phase II/V rules). States  may note
in their application any revision to an
existing monitoring plan  or  note that
the same monitoring plan will be used.
The State must demonstrate that the
monitoring plan  is enforceable under
State law.
[54 FR 15188, Apr. 17, 1989,  as amended at 54
FR 27539, June 29, 1989; 55 FR 25065, June 19,
1990; 56 FR 3595, Jan. 30, 1991; 56 FR  26563,
June 7, 1991; 57 FR 31847, July 17, 1992; 59 FR
33864, June 30,  1994; 63 FR 44535, Aug. 19, 1998;
63  FR 69475, 69520, Dec. 16,  1998; 64 FR 34733,
June 29, 1999; 64 FR 50620, Sept. 17, 1999; 65 FR
2015, Jan. 12, 2000; 65 FR 26048, 26049, May 4,
2000; 65 FR 76751, Dec. 7, 2000; 66 FR 7066, Jan.
22, 2001; 66 FR 31105, June 8, 2001; 67 FR 1844,
Jan. 14, 2002]
 EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38857, June
29, 2004, §142.16 was amended in paragraph
(1)(2) by removing the citation "§142.16(e)(5)"
and adding in its place "§142.16(e)(2)"; by add-
ing and reserving  paragraphs (m), (n), and
(o); by redesignating the first paragraph (j)
as  paragraph  (p); and in newly  designated
paragraph  (p)(2)(ii) by removing the citation
"141.536" and adding in its place "141.535", ef-
fective July 29, 2004.

§ 142.17  Review of State programs and
    procedures  for withdrawal  of ap-
    proved primacy programs.
  (a)(l) At least annually the Adminis-
trator shall  review,  with respect  to
each  State determined to have primary
enforcement  responsibility, the compli-
ance  of the  State with  the require-
ments set forth in 40 CFR part 142, sub-
part B, and the approved State primacy
program.  At the  time  of this  review,
the  State shall  notify the  Adminis-
trator of any State-initiated program
changes (i.e., changes other than those
to adopt  new or  revised  EPA  regula-
tions), and of any transfer of all or part
of  its program from the  approved State
agency to any other State agency.
  (2) When, on the basis of the Admin-
istrator's review or other available in-
formation,  the  Administrator  deter-
mines that a State no longer meets the
requirements set forth in 40 CFR part
142, subpart B, the Administrator shall
initiate  proceedings to withdraw pri-
macy approval. Among the factors the
Administrator intends to  consider  as
relevant to this determination are the
following,  where appropriate: whether
the State  has requested and has  been
granted, or is awaiting EPA's decision
on, an extension under §142.12(b)(2) of
the  deadlines for  meeting those re-
quirements;  and whether the State is
taking  corrective   actions  that  may
have  been  required by  the Adminis-
trator. The Administrator shall notify
the State in writing that EPA is initi-
ating primacy withdrawal proceedings
and shall summarize in the notice the
information available that  indicates
that the State no longer meets such re-
quirements.
  (3)  The  State notified pursuant  to
paragraph (a)(2) of this section may,
within 30 days of receiving the Admin-
istrator's notice, submit to the Admin-
istrator  evidence  demonstrating  that
the State continues  to  meet  the re-
quirements  for primary  enforcement
responsibility.
  (4) After reviewing the submission of
the State,  if any,  made pursuant  to
paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the Ad-
ministrator  shall make a final deter-
mination  either  that  the State no
longer meets the  requirements  of 40
CFR part  142, subpart B, or  that the
State continues to meet those require-
ments, and shall notify the State of his
or her determination. Any final deter-
mination  that  the  State  no  longer
meets the requirements of 40 CFR part
142, subpart B, shall not become effec-
tive except as provided in §142.13.
  (b) If a State which has primary en-
forcement responsibility decides to re-
linquish  that authority,  it may do  so
by notifying the Administrator in writ-
ing of the State's  decision at least 90
days before the effective date of the de-
cision.

[54 FR 52140, Dec. 20, 1989, as amended at 60
FR 33661, June 28,1995]
                                     589

-------
§142.18
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§142.18 EPA  review  of State  moni-
    toring determinations.
  (a)  A Regional Administrator may
annul  a  State monitoring  determina-
tion for  the  types  of  determinations
identified   in   §§141.23(b),   141.23(c),
141.24(f),  141.24(11), and  141.40(n) in ac-
cordance with the procedures in para-
graph (b) of this section.
  (b) When information available to a
Regional  Administrator, such  as  the
results of an annual review, indicate a
State determination fails to apply the
standards of  the approved  State pro-
gram,  he may  propose to  annul  the
State  monitoring  determination  by
sending the State and the affected PWS
a  draft  Rescission  Order.  The draft
order shall:
  (1) Identify the PWS, the State deter-
mination, and the provisions at issue;
  (2) Explain why the State  determina-
tion is not  in  compliance with  the
State  program and  must be  changed;
and
  (3) Describe the actions and terms of
operation the PWS will be  required to
implement.
  (c) The State and PWS shall have 60
days to comment on the draft Rescis-
sion Order.
  (d) The Regional Administrator may
not issue a Rescission Order to impose
conditions less  stringent   than  those
imposed by the State.
  (e) The Regional Administrator shall
also provide an  opportunity  for com-
ment upon the draft Rescission Order,
by
  (1) Publishing  a  notice   in a  news-
paper in general circulation in commu-
nities  served  by the affected system;
and
  (2) Providing 30 days  for public com-
ment on the draft order.
  (f) The State shall demonstrate that
the determination is reasonable, based
on its approved State program.
  (g) The Regional Administrator shall
decide within  120 days after  issuance of
the draft Rescission Order to:
  (1)  Issue  the  Rescission Order  as
drafted;
  (2) Issue a modified Rescission Order;
or
  (3) Cancel the Rescission Order.
  (h) The Regional Administrator shall
set forth the  reasons for his  decision,
including a  responsiveness summary
addressing significant comments from
the State, the PWS and the public.
  (i) The Regional Administrator shall
send a notice of his final decision to
the State, the PWS and all parties who
commented upon the  draft Rescission
Order.
  (j) The Rescission Order shall remain
in effect  until  cancelled  by the  Re-
gional  Administrator. The  Regional
Administrator may cancel a Rescission
Order at any time, so long as he noti-
fies those who commented on the draft
order.
  (k) The Regional Administrator may
not  delegate  the  signature  authority
for a final Rescission Order or the can-
cellation of an order.
  (1) Violation of the actions, or terms
of operation, required by a Rescission
Order is a violation of the  Safe Drink-
ing Water Act.

[56 PR 3595, Jan. 30, 1991]

§142.19  EPA  review  of State  imple-
   mentation  of  national  primary
   drinking water  regulations for lead
   and copper.
  (a) Pursuant to the procedures in this
section,  the  Regional Administrator
may review  state  determinations es-
tablishing corrosion control or  source
water treatment requirements for lead
or copper and may issue an order estab-
lishing federal treatment requirements
for a public water  system  pursuant to
§141.82 (d) and (f) and  §141.83(b) (2)  and
(4) where the Regional Administrator
finds that:
  (1) A State has failed to issue a treat-
ment determination by the applicable
deadline;
  (2) A State has abused its  discretion
in making corrosion control or  source
water treatment determinations  in  a
substantial number of cases or in cases
affecting a substantial population, or
  (3) The technical aspects of State's
determination would be indefensible in
an expected federal enforcement action
taken against a system.
  (b) If the Regional Administrator de-
termines that review of state determi-
nation(s) under this section may be ap-
propriate, he shall request the State to
                                     590

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.19
forward  to  EPA the state determina-
tion and all information that was con-
sidered by the State in making its de-
termination,  including  public  com-
ments, if any, within 60 days of the Re-
gional Adminstrator's request.
  (c)  Proposed review  of  state deter-
minations:
  (1) Where the Regional Administrator
finds that review of a state determina-
tion under paragraph (a) of this section
is appropriate,  he shall  issue a pro-
posed review order which shall:
  (i)  Identify  the  public  water  sys-
tem(s) affected, the State determina-
tion being reviewed and the provisions
of state and/or federal law at issue;
  (ii) Identify the  determination  that
the State failed to carry out by the ap-
plicable  deadline,  or identify the par-
ticular provisions of the  State deter-
mination which, in the Regional  Ad-
ministrator's  judgment, fail to  carry
out properly applicable treatment re-
quirements, and explain the basis for
the Regional  Administrator's conclu-
sion;
  (ill) Identify the treatment require-
ments which  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator proposes to apply to the affected
system(s), and explain the  basis for the
proposed requirements;
  (iv) Request public comment on the
proposed  order and  the  supporting
record.
  (2) The Regional Administrator shall
provide notice of the proposed review
order by:
  (i) Mailing the proposed  order to the
affected  public water  system(s),  the
state  agency   whose  order  is  being
reviewed, and any other parties  of
interest known to the Regional Admin-
istrator;  and
  (ii)  Publishing a copy  of the proposed
order in a newspaper of general circula-
tion in the affected communities.
  (3) The Regional Administrator shall
make  available for public inspection
during the comment period the record
supporting the proposed  order, which
shall  include  all  of the  information
submitted by  the State to EPA under
paragraph (b)  of this section, all  other
studies, monitoring data and other in-
formation considered by the Agency in
developing the proposed order.
  (d) Final review order:
  (1) Based upon review of all informa-
tion obtained regarding  the  proposed
review  order,  including  public com-
ments,  the  Regional  Administrator
shall issue a final review order within
120 days after issuance of the proposed
order which affirms, modifies, or with-
draws the proposed order.  The Regional
Administrator may extend the time pe-
riod for issuing the final order for good
cause.  If  the final  order modifies  or
withdraws the proposed order, the final
order shall explain the  reasons sup-
porting the change.
  (2) The record of the final order shall
consist  of the record supporting the
proposed  order, all public comments,
all other information considered by the
Regional Administrator in issuing the
final order and a document responding
to all significant public comments sub-
mitted  on the proposed order.  If new
points are raised or new material sup-
plied during the public comment  pe-
riod, the Regional  Administrator may
support the responses on those matters
by adding new materials to the record.
The record shall be complete when the
final order is issued.
  (3) Notice of the  final order shall  be
provided by mailing the final order  to
the affected system(s),  the State, and
all parties who commented on the pro-
posed order.
  (4) Upon issuance  of the final order,
its terms constitute requirements  of
the  national primary drinking  water
regulation for lead and/or  copper until
such time as the  Regional Adminis-
trator issues a new order (which may
include  recision of the previous order)
pursuant to the procedures in this sec-
tion.  Such  requirements   shall  super-
sede any  inconsistent  treatment  re-
quirements  established by the  State
pursuant  to  the   national  primary
drinking water regulations for lead and
copper.
  (5) The Regional Administrator may
not issue a final order to impose condi-
tions less stringent than those imposed
by the State.
  (e) The Regional  Administrator may
not delegate authority to sign the final
order under this section.
  (f) Final action of the Regional Ad-
ministrator under paragraph (d)  of this
section  shall constitute action  of the
                                    591

-------
§142.20
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Administrator for purposes of 42 U.S.C.
§300j-7(a)(2).
[56 FR 26563, June 7, 1991]

Subpart C—Review of State-Issued
    Variances and Exemptions

§ 142.20 State-issued variances and ex-
   emptions under Section 1415(a) and
   Section 1416 of the Act.
  (a) States with primary enforcement
responsibility may issue variances  to
public water systems (other than small
system variances)  from  the require-
ments of primary drinking water regu-
lations under conditions and in a man-
ner which are not  less stringent than
the requirements under Section 1415(a)
of the Act. In States that do not have
primary   enforcement  responsibility,
variances may be granted by the Ad-
ministrator pursuant to Subpart E  of
this part.
  (1) A State must document all find-
ings that are required under  Section
1415(a) of the Act.
  (2) If a State prescribes  a schedule
pursuant  to  section 1415(a)  of the Act
requiring  compliance with a contami-
nant  level for which  the variance  is
granted later than  five years from the
date of issuance of the  variance the
State must—
  (i) Document its rationale for the ex-
tended compliance schedule;
  (ii) Discuss the rationale  for the ex-
tended compliance  schedule  in the re-
quired public notice and opportunity
for public hearing; and
  (iii) Provide the shortest practicable
time  schedule  feasible under the cir-
cumstances.
  (b) States with primary enforcement
responsibility may issue exemptions
from   the requirements of  primary
drinking water regulations  under con-
ditions and in a manner which are not
less  stringent  than the  requirements
under Section 1416 of the Act. In States
that do not have primary enforcement
responsibility,   exemptions  may   be
granted by the Administrator pursuant
to Subpart P of this part.
  (1) A State must document all find-
ings that are required under  Section
1416 of the Act:
  (i) Before  finding that management
and  restructuring  changes  cannot  be
made,  a State must consider the fol-
lowing measures, and  the  availability
of State Revolving Loan Fund  assist-
ance, or any  other Federal or State
program, that is reasonably likely  to
be available within the period  of the
exemption  to  implement these meas-
ures:
  (A) Consideration of rate increases,
accounting changes, the appointment
of a  State-certified operator under the
State's   Operator  Certification pro-
gram, contractual agreements for joint
operation with  one  or more  public
water systems;
  (B)  Activities  consistent  with the
State's  Capacity Development  Strat-
egy to help the public water system ac-
quire and  maintain technical,  finan-
cial, and managerial capacity to come
into compliance with the Act; and
  (C) Ownership changes, physical con-
solidation with  another public water
system, or other  feasible  and  appro-
priate  means  of consolidation  which
would  result in compliance with the
Act;
  (ii)  The  State  must consider the
availability of an alternative source of
water, including the feasibility of part-
nerships with neighboring public water
systems, as identified by  the  public
water  system or  by  the  State con-
sistent with the Capacity Development
Strategy.
  (2) In the case of a public water sys-
tem  serving a population of not more
than 3,300 persons and which needs  fi-
nancial assistance  for the necessary
improvements under the initial compli-
ance schedule, an  exemption granted
by    the   State    under    section
1416(b)(2)(B)(i) or (ii) of the Act may be
renewed for one or more additional 2-
year periods, but not to exceed a total
of 6 additional years, only if the State
establishes that the public water sys-
tem  is taking all practicable steps  to
meet  the  requirements  of  Section
1416(b)(2)(B) of the  Act and the estab-
lished compliance schedule to achieve
full compliance with the contaminant
level or treatment technique for which
the  exemption was granted.  A State
must document its findings in granting
an extension under this paragraph.

[63 FR 43847, Aug. 14, 1998]
                                    592

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.23
§142.21  State consideration of a vari-
    ance or exemption request.

  A State with  primary  enforcement
responsibility shall act on any variance
or  exemption request submitted to it,
within 90 days of receipt of the request.

§ 142.22  Review of State variances, ex-
    emptions and schedules.
  (a) Not later than 18 months after the
effective date of the interim national
primary drinking water regulations the
Administrator  shall  complete a  com-
prehensive review of  the variances and
exemptions granted (and schedules pre-
scribed pursuant thereto) by the States
with  primary  enforcement  responsi-
bility during the one-year period begin-
ning on such effective  date.  The Ad-
ministrator shall conduct such subse-
quent reviews of exemptions and sched-
ules as he deems necessary to carry out
the purposes of this title,  but at  least
one review shall be  completed within
each 3-year period following  the  com-
pletion of the  first  review under  this
paragraph.
  (b) Notice of a  proposed  review  shall
be published  in the FEDERAL REGISTER.
Such notice  shall (1) provide  informa-
tion respecting the location of data and
other   information   respecting   the
variances  and exemptions to  be re-
viewed (including data and other infor-
mation concerning new scientific  mat-
ters bearing  on such  variances and ex-
emptions), and (2) advise of the oppor-
tunity  to  submit comments on  the
variances and exemptions reviewed and
on  the need for continuing them. Upon
completion of any such review, the Ad-
ministrator shall  publish  in  the  FED-
ERAL REGISTER the  results of his re-
view, together with findings responsive
to any comments submitted in connec-
tion with such review.

§ 142.23  Notice to State.
  (a) If the Administrator  finds that a
State has, in a substantial number of
instances,  abused  its  discretion  in
granting   variances   or  exemptions
under section 1415(a)  or  section 1416(a)
of the Act  or failed to prescribe sched-
ules in accordance with  section 1415(a)
or section  1416(b)  of the Act,  he shall
notify  the  State  of his findings. Such
notice shall:
  (1) Identify each public water system
for which the finding was made;
  (2) Specify the reasons for the find-
ing; and
  (3) As appropriate,  propose revoca-
tion of  specific  variances or  exemp-
tions, or propose revised schedules for
specific public water systems.
  (b) The Administrator shall also no-
tify the  State of a public hearing to be
held on the provisions of the notice re-
quired by paragraph (a) of this section.
Such notice shall specify the time and
location for the hearing. If, upon noti-
fication  of a finding by the  Adminis-
trator,  the State  takes adequate cor-
rective action, the Administrator shall
rescind his notice to the State of a pub-
lic hearing, provided that the Adminis-
trator  is notified of the corrective ac-
tion prior to the hearing.
  (c) The Administrator shall publish
notice of the public hearing in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER and  in  a newspaper or
newspapers of  general  circulation  in
the involved State  including a sum-
mary of the findings made pursuant to
paragraph (a)  of this section,  a state-
ment of the time and location for the
hearing, and the address and telephone
number of an office at which interested
persons  may obtain further  informa-
tion concerning the hearing.
  (d) Hearings  convened pursuant  to
paragraphs  (b)  and  (c)  of this section
shall be  conducted before a hearing of-
ficer to be designated by the  Adminis-
trator. The hearing  shall be conducted
by the hearing officer in an informal,
orderly and expeditious manner. The
hearing officer shall have authority to
call witnesses, receive oral and written
testimony and take such other action
as may be necessary to assure the fair
and efficient conduct of the hearing.
Following  the conclusion of the hear-
ing,  the hearing  officer shall forward
the record of the hearing to the Admin-
istrator.
  (e) Within 180 days after the date no-
tice is given pursuant to paragraph (b)
of  this  section,  the   Administrator
shall:
  (1) Rescind the finding for which the
notice  was given and promptly notify
the State of such rescission, or
  (2) Promulgate with any  modifica-
tions as appropriate such  revocation
and revised schedules proposed in such
                                    593

-------
§142.24
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
notice and promptly notify the State of
such action.
  (f) A revocation or revised schedule
shall take effect 90 days after the State
is notified  under paragraph (e)(2) of
this section.
§ 142.24 Administrator's rescission.
  If, upon notification  of a finding by
the  Administrator under  §142.23,  the
State takes adequate corrective action
before the effective date of the revoca-
tion or revised schedule, the Adminis-
trator shall rescind the application of
his finding to that variance, exemption
or schedule.

 Subpart D—Federal  Enforcement

§ 142.30 Failure by State to assure en-
    forcement.
  (a) The Administrator shall notify a
State and  the  appropriate supplier of
water  whenever he finds during a pe-
riod in which the State  has primary en-
forcement   responsibility  for  public
water systems that a public water  sys-
tem within such State is not in compli-
ance with any primary drinking water
regulation  contained in part 141 of  this
chapter or with any schedule or other
requirements imposed  pursuant to  a
variance or exemption granted  under
section 1415 or 1416 of the Act: Provided,
That the State will be  deemed to have
been notified of a violation referred to
in a report submitted by the State.
  (b) The  Administrator shall  provide
advice and technical assistance to such
State and public water system as may
be appropriate to bring  the system into
compliance by  the  earliest  feasible
time.
[41 FR  2918, Jan. 20, 1976,  as amended at 52
FR 20675, June 2, 1987]

§ 142.31 [Reserved]

§ 142.32 Petition for public hearing.
  (a)  If the Administrator  makes  a
finding of  noncompliance  pursuant to
§142.30  with respect to a public water
system in  a State which  has primary
enforcement responsibility, the Admin-
istrator may, for the purpose of assist-
ing that State in carrying out such re-
sponsibility and upon  the petition of
such State  or public water system or
persons served by  such system, hold,
after  appropriate  notice, public hear-
ings for the purpose of gathering infor-
mation as described in §142.33.
  (b)  A petition  for  a  public  hearing
pursuant to paragraph  (a) of this sec-
tion shall  be  filed with the Adminis-
trator and shall include the following
information:
  (1) The name, address and telephone
number of the individual or other enti-
ty requesting a hearing.
  (2) If the petition is filed by a person
other than  the State  or public  water
system, a statement that the person is
served by the system.
  (3) A brief statement of information
that the requesting person intends to
submit at the requested hearing.
  (4) The signature of the  individual
submitting the petition; or, if the peti-
tion is filed on behalf of a State, public
water system  or other  entity,  the sig-
nature of a responsible official of the
State or other entity.

§ 142.33 Public hearing.
  (a)  If the Administrator grants  the
petition  for public hearing, he shall
give appropriate public notice  of such
hearing.  Such notice shall be by publi-
cation in the FEDERAL REGISTER and in
a newspaper of general circulation or
by  other appropriate communications
media covering the area served by such
public water system.
  (b)  A hearing officer designated by
the Administrator  shall gather during
the public  hearing information from
technical or  other experts, Federal,
State, or  other  public officials, rep-
resentatives of the public water sys-
tem, persons served by the system, and
other interested persons on:
  (1) The ways in which the system can
within  the earliest feasible time  be
brought into compliance, and
  (2) The means for the maximum fea-
sible  protection  of the public health
during any period  in which such sys-
tem is not in compliance.
  (c)  On the basis  of the  hearing and
other  available information the  Ad-
ministrator shall  issue  recommenda-
tions which shall be sent to the State
and public water system and shall be
made available to the public and com-
munications media.
                                     594

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.41
§ 142.34 Entry and inspection of public
    water systems.
  (a)  Any  supplier of water or  other
person subject to a national primary
drinking water regulation shall, at any
time,  allow  the  Administrator, or a
designated representative  of the Ad-
ministrator,  upon presenting  appro-
priate credentials and a written notice
of inspection, to enter any  establish-
ment, facility or other property of such
supplier or other person to determine
whether such supplier or other person
has acted  or is  acting in compliance
with  the requirements of the Act or
subchapter D of this chapter. Such in-
spection  may include  inspection, at
reasonable times, of records, files,  pa-
pers,  processes, controls  and facilities,
or testing  of any feature  of a public
water system, including  its raw water
source.
  (b) Prior to entry into  any establish-
ment, facility or  other property within
a State which has primary enforcement
responsibility, the Administrator shall
notify, in  writing, the  State agency
charged  with responsibility  for  safe
drinking water   of  his  intention to
make such entry and shall include in
his notification a statement of reasons
for such   entry.  The  Administrator
shall,  upon  a showing  by the  State
agency that such an entry will be det-
rimental to the  administration of  the
State's program  of primary enforce-
ment responsibility, take such showing
into  consideration   in   determining
whether to make such entry. The Ad-
ministrator shall  in any event offer the
State agency the  opportunity of having
a  representative  accompany  the Ad-
ministrator  or his representative  on
such entry.
  (c)  No  State agency which receives
notice under  paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion  may  use the  information con-
tained in the notice to inform the per-
son whose  property is proposed to be
entered of the  proposed  entry; if a
State so uses such information, notice
to the agency under  paragraph (b) of
this section is not required for subse-
quent inspections of public water sys-
tems  until such  time as the Adminis-
trator determines that the agency has
provided  him satisfactory assurances
that it will no longer so use informa-
tion contained  in a  notice  received
under paragraph (b) of this section.

Subpart  E—Variances Issued  by
    the Administrator Under  Sec-
    tion 1415(a)of the Act

§ 142.40 Requirements for a variance.
  (a) The Administrator may grant one
or more variances to any public water
system within a State that does not
have  primary enforcement  responsi-
bility from any requirement respecting
a maximum  contaminant level of an
applicable  national  primary drinking
water regulation upon a finding that:
  (1) Because  of characteristics of the
raw water sources which are  reason-
ably available to the system, the sys-
tem cannot meet the requirements re-
specting the  maximum  contaminant
levels  of such drinking  water regula-
tions  despite  application of the best
technology, treatment techniques,  or
other means, which  the Administrator
finds  are  generally available  (taking
costs into consideration); and
  (2) The  granting of  a variance will
not result  in  an  unreasonable  risk  to
the health of persons served by the sys-
tem.
  (b) The Administrator may grant one
or more variances to any public water
system within a State that does not
have  primary enforcement  responsi-
bility from any requirement of a speci-
fied treatment technique of an applica-
ble national  primary  drinking water
regulation upon a finding that the pub-
lic water system applying for the vari-
ance has demonstrated that such treat-
ment technique is not necessary to pro-
tect the health of persons because  of
the nature of the  raw  water source  of
such system.

§ 142.41 Variance request.
  A supplier of water may request the
granting of a variance pursuant to this
subpart for a public water system with-
in a State that does not have primary
enforcement responsibility by submit-
ting a request for a variance in writing
to  the Administrator.  Suppliers   of
water may submit a joint request  for
variances   when   they  seek   similar
variances under similar circumstances.
Any written request for  a variance  or
                                    595

-------
§142.42
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
variances shall include the following-
information:
  (a) The nature and duration of vari-
ance requested.
  (b)  Relevant  analytical  results  of
water quality sampling of the system,
including results of relevant tests con-
ducted pursuant to the requirements of
the national  primary drinking  water
regulations.
  (c)  For  any request  made  under
§142.40(a):
  (1) Explanation  in full  and evidence
of the best available treatment tech-
nology and techniques.
  (2) Economic  and legal factors rel-
evant to ability to comply.
  (3) Analytical results of raw  water
quality  relevant  to  the  variance re-
quest.
  (4) A  proposed compliance schedule,
including the  date  each step toward
compliance  will  be achieved.  Such
schedule shall include  as a minimum
the following dates:
  (i) Date by which arrangement for al-
ternative raw  water source or improve-
ment of existing raw water source will
be completed.
  (ii) Date of  initiation of the connec-
tion  of the  alternative  raw  water
source or improvement  of existing raw
water source.
  (iii) Date  by which final  compliance
is to be achieved.
  (5) A  plan for the  provision of safe
drinking water in the case of an exces-
sive rise in the contaminant level for
which the variance is requested.
  (6) A plan for additional interim con-
trol measures during the effective pe-
riod of variance.
  (d)  For  any request  made  under
§142.40(b), a statement that the system
will perform monitoring and other rea-
sonable requirements prescribed by the
Administrator as a condition to  the
variance.
  (e)  Other information,  if  any,  be-
lieved to be pertinent by the applicant.
  (f) Such other information as the Ad-
ministrator may require.
[41 PR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 52
PR 20675, June 2, 1987]

§ 142.42  Consideration  of  a variance
    request.
  (a) The Administrator  shall act  on
any variance request submitted pursu-
ant to § 142.41 within 90 days of receipt
of the request.
  (b) In  his  consideration of  whether
the public water system is  unable to
comply with a  contaminant level re-
quired by the national primary drink-
ing water  regulations  because of the
nature of the raw water source, the Ad-
ministrator shall consider such factors
as the following:
  (1) The availability and effectiveness
of treatment methods  for the contami-
nant  for which the  variance is re-
quested.
  (2) Cost and other economic consider-
ations such as  implementing treat-
ment,  improving  the  quality  of the
source  water or  using  an  alternate
source.
  (c) A variance may  be issued  to  a
public  water system  on the condition
that the public water system  install
the best technology,  treatment tech-
niques, or other means, which the Ad-
ministrator finds are available (taking
costs into  consideration)  and  based
upon an  evaluation satisfactory to the
Administrator that  indicates  that al-
ternative sources of water are not rea-
sonably available  to  the public water
system.
  (d) In his consideration of  whether a
public water system should be granted
a variance to  a  required  treatment
technique  because  such  treatment is
unnecessary  to  protect  the  public
health,  the  Administrator shall  con-
sider such factors as the following:
  (1) Quality of the  water source in-
cluding water quality data  and  perti-
nent sources of pollution.
  (2) Source protection measures  em-
ployed by the public water system.
[41 PR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 52
PR 20675,  June 2, 1987; 63 PR 43847, Aug. 14,
1998]

§ 142.43  Disposition of a variance re-
   quest.
  (a) If the  Administrator decides to
deny the application for a variance, he
shall notify the  applicant of his inten-
tion to issue a denial. Such notice shall
include a statement of reasons for the
proposed denial, and shall offer the ap-
plicant  an  opportunity  to  present,
within 30 days of receipt of the notice,
additional  information or argument to
the Administrator. The Administrator
                                     596

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.44
shall make a  final determination  on
the request within 30 days after receiv-
ing any such additional information or
argument. If no additional information
or argument is submitted by the appli-
cant the application shall be denied.
  (b) If the Administrator proposes to
grant  a  variance  request  submitted
pursuant to §142.41, he shall notify the
applicant  of his decision in writing.
Such notice shall identify the variance,
the facility covered, and shall specify
the period of time  for which the vari-
ance will be effective.
  (1) For the type of variance specified
in §142.40(a)  such notice  shall  provide
that the  variance  will be terminated
when the  system comes  into  compli-
ance  with the  applicable regulation,
and may be terminated upon a finding
by the Administrator that the system
has failed to comply with any require-
ments of a final schedule issued pursu-
ant to §142.44.
  (2) For the type of variance specified
in §142.40(b)  such notice  shall  provide
that the variance may be terminated
at any time upon a  finding that the na-
ture of the raw water source  is such
that the specified treatment technique
for which the variance was granted is
necessary to protect the health of per-
sons or upon a finding that the public
water system has failed to comply with
monitoring and other   requirements
prescribed by the Administrator as a
condition to the granting of the vari-
ance.
  (c)  For  a  variance   specified   in
§142.40(a)(l)  the Administrator  shall
propose a schedule for:
  (1) Compliance (including increments
of progress) by the public  water system
with each contaminant  level require-
ment covered by the variance; and,
  (2)  Implementation  by the  public
water system of such additional con-
trol  measures  as  the  Administrator
may require for each contaminant cov-
ered by the variance.
  (d) The proposed schedule for  compli-
ance shall specify dates by which steps
towards compliance are to be taken, in-
cluding at the  minimum, where appli-
cable:
  (1) Date by which  arrangement for an
alternative  raw water  source  or im-
provement of existing raw water source
will be completed.
  (2) Date of initiation of the connec-
tion for  the alternative raw water
source or improvement of the existing
raw water source.
  (3) Date by which final compliance is
to be achieved.
  (e) The proposed schedule may, if the
public  water system  has no access to
an  alternative raw water source, and
can effect or anticipate no adequate
improvement of the existing raw water
source,  specify an indefinite  time pe-
riod for compliance until a new and ef-
fective treatment  technology is devel-
oped at which time a new compliance
schedule shall be prescribed by the Ad-
ministrator.
  (f) The proposed schedule for imple-
mentation of additional  interim  con-
trol measures during the period of vari-
ance shall specify interim treatment
techniques,  methods  and equipment,
and dates by which steps toward meet-
ing  the  additional  interim  control
measures are to be met.
  (g) The schedule shall be prescribed
by  the  Administrator at the time of
granting of the variance, subsequent to
provision of  opportunity  for hearing
pursuant to § 142.44.

[41 PR 2918, Jan. 20,  1976, as amended  at 52
FR 20675, June 2, 1987]

§142.44   Public hearings  on  variances
    and schedules.
  (a) Before  a variance and  schedule
proposed by  the Administrator  pursu-
ant to §142.43 may take effect, the Ad-
ministrator  shall  provide notice  and
opportunity for  public hearing on  the
variance and schedule. A notice given
pursuant  to   the  preceding  sentence
may cover the granting of more than
one variance  and a hearing held pursu-
ant to such notice  shall include each of
the variances covered by the notice.
  (b) Public notice of an  opportunity
for  hearing on a variance and schedule
shall be circulated  in a  manner  de-
signed to inform interested and poten-
tially interested persons  of the  pro-
posed variance and schedule, and shall
include at least the following:
  (1) Posting of a notice in  the prin-
cipal post office of each  municipality
or area served by the  public water sys-
tem, and publishing  of a  notice in a
                                    597

-------
§142.45
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
newspaper or newspapers of general cir-
culation in the area served by the pub-
lic water system; and
  (2) Mailing of a notice to the agency
of the State in which the system is lo-
cated  which  is  responsible for  the
State's  water supply program, and to
other appropriate State or local agen-
cies at the Administrator's discretion.
  (3) Such notice shall include a sum-
mary of  the  proposed variance  and
schedule  and shall inform  interested
persons that they may request a public
hearing on the proposed variance  and
schedule.
  (c) Requests for hearing may be sub-
mitted by any interested person other
than a Federal agency. Frivolous or in-
substantial  requests for hearing  may
be  denied by the  Administrator.  Re-
quests must  be submitted to the  Ad-
ministrator   within   30  days  after
issuance of the public notices provided
for  in paragraph (b)  of this section.
Such  requests shall include the  fol-
lowing information:
  (1) The  name, address and telephone
number of the  individual, organization
or other entity requesting a hearing;
  (2) A brief  statement of the interest
of the person making the request in the
proposed variance and schedule, and of
information that the requester intends
to submit at such hearing;
  (3) The signature of the  individual
making: the request,  or, if the request
is made on behalf of an organization or
other entity, the signature of a respon-
sible  official  of the  organization  or
other entity.
  (d) The Administrator shall give no-
tice in  the manner set forth in para-
graph (b)  of this section of any hearing
to be held pursuant to a  request sub-
mitted by an interested person  or on
his  own motion.  Notice of the hearing
shall  also be sent  to the persons re-
questing the hearing, if any. Notice of
the hearing shall include  a  statement
of the purpose  of the hearing, informa-
tion regarding the  time and location
for  the hearing,  and the  address  and
telephone number of an office at which
interested persons  may obtain further
information concerning the hearing. At
least one hearing location specified in
the public notice shall be within the in-
volved State. Notice of hearing shall be
given not less than 15 days prior to the
time scheduled for the hearing.
  (e) A hearing convened  pursuant to
paragraph  (d) of this section shall be
conducted before a hearing officer to be
designated by the  Administrator.  The
hearing shall be conducted by the hear-
ing officer in an informal, orderly  and
expeditious manner. The hearing offi-
cer shall have  authority  to call wit-
nesses,  receive oral and written testi-
mony  and take such other action as
may be necessary to assure the fair and
efficient conduct of the hearing. Fol-
lowing  the  conclusion of the hearing,
the hearing officer shall  forward  the
record of the  hearing to the Adminis-
trator.
  (f) The variance  and schedule shall
become effective 30 days after notice of
opportunity for hearing is given pursu-
ant to paragraph (b) of this section if
no timely  request  for hearing is sub-
mitted and the Administrator does not
determine to hold a public hearing on
his own motion.

[41 FR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 52
PR 20675, June 2, 1987]

§ 142.45  Action after hearing.
  Within 30 days after the  termination
of the public hearing held pursuant to
§142.44, the Administrator shall, taking
into  consideration  information  ob-
tained  during  such hearing  and  rel-
evant  information,  confirm, revise or
rescind  the  proposed   variance   and
schedule.

[52 FR 20675, June 2, 1987]

§142.46  Alternative  treatment  tech-
   niques.
  The Administrator may grant a vari-
ance from any treatment technique re-
quirement of a national primary drink-
ing water  regulation to a supplier of
water, whether or not the public water
system for  which  the variance  is re-
quested is located in a State which has
primary  enforcement  responsibility,
upon a showing from any person that
an alternative treatment technique not
included  in such  requirement  is at
least as efficient in lowering the level
of the  contaminant with respect to
                                     598

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.51
which  such  requirements  was  pre-
scribed.  A variance under this  para-
graph shall be conditioned on the use
of the alternative treatment technique
which is the basis of the variance.

 Subpart F—Exemptions Issued by
         the Administrator

§ 142.50   Requirements for  an exemp-
    tion.
  (a)  The Administrator  may exempt
any public water system within a State
that  does  not have primary enforce-
ment responsibility from any require-
ment regarding a maximum contami-
nant  level or any treatment technique
requirement, or from both, of an appli-
cable national primary drinking- water
regulation upon a finding that—
  (1) Due to compelling factors (which
may include economic factors, includ-
ing qualification of the  public water
system as a system serving a disadvan-
taged community pursuant to section
1452(d) of the Act), the  public water
system  is unable to comply with such
contaminant level  or  treatment tech-
nique requirement or to  implement
measures to  develop  an alternative
source of water supply;
  (2)  The public water system was  in
operation on the effective date of such
contaminant level  or  treatment tech-
nique requirement, or  for a  public
water system that was not in operation
by that  date, no reasonable alternative
source of drinking water is available  to
such new public water system;
  (3)  The granting of the  exemption
will not result in an unreasonable risk
to health; and
  (4)  Management  or  restructuring
changes  (or  both),  as  provided   in
§142.20(b)(l)(i),  cannot  reasonably   be
made that  will result in compliance
with  the  applicable national primary
drinking water regulation or,  if com-
pliance  cannot be  achieved,  improve
the quality of the drinking water.
  (b) No exemption shall be granted un-
less the public water system  estab-
lishes that the public  water system  is
taking all practicable steps  to  meet
the standard; and
  (1) The public water system cannot
meet  the standard without capital im-
provements which cannot be completed
prior to the date established pursuant
to Section 1412(b)(10) of the Act;
  (2) In the case of a public water sys-
tem which needs  financial assistance
for the necessary  improvements, the
public water system has entered into
an agreement to obtain such financial
assistance  or assistance  pursuant to
Section 1452  of the  Act, or any  other
Federal or State  program  that is rea-
sonably likely to  be available within
the period of the exemption; or
  (3) The public water system has en-
tered into an enforceable agreement to
become a  part  of  a  regional public
water system.
  (c) A public water system may not
receive an exemption under this sub-
part if the  public water  system was
granted  a  variance  under  Section
1415(e) of the Act.

[63 FR 43847, Aug. 14, 1998]

§ 142.51 Exemption request.
  A supplier of water may request the
granting  of an exemption  pursuant to
this subpart for a  public water system
within a  State that does not have pri-
mary  enforcement  responsibility by
submitting a request for exemption in
writing to  the Administrator.  Sup-
pliers of water may submit a joint re-
quest for  exemptions when they seek
similar exemptions  under  similar cir-
cumstances. Any written request for an
exemption or exemptions shall include
the following information:
  (a) The nature  and  duration of ex-
emption requested.
  (b)  Relevant analytical  results of
water quality sampling of  the system,
including results of relevant tests con-
ducted pursuant to the requirements of
the national primary  drinking  water
regulations.
  (c)  Explanation   of the   compelling
factors such as time or economic fac-
tors which prevent  such system  from
achieving compliance.
  (d)  Other information,  if any, be-
lieved by the applicant to be pertinent
to the application.
  (e) A proposed compliance schedule,
including the date when each step to-
ward compliance will be achieved.
  (f) Such other information as the Ad-
ministrator may require.
                                    599
      203-160  D-20

-------
§142.52
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 142.52 Consideration of an exemption
    request.
  (a) The Administrator shall act on
any exemption request submitted pur-
suant to §142.51 within  90 days of re-
ceipt of the request.
  (b) In his consideration of whether
the public water system is unable to
comply due to compelling- factors, the
Administrator shall  consider such fac-
tors as the following:
  (1)  Construction,   installation,  or
modification of the treatment equip-
ment or systems.
  (2) The time needed to put into oper-
ation  a new treatment facility to re-
place  an existing1 system which is not
in compliance.
  (3) Economic  feasibility of  compli-
ance.

§ 142.53 Disposition  of  an exemption
    request.
  (a) If the Administrator decides to
deny the application for an exemption,
he shall notify the applicant of his in-
tention to issue a denial.  Such notice
shall include a statement of reasons for
the proposed denial,  and shall offer the
applicant  an  opportunity to present,
within 30 days of receipt of the notice,
additional information or argument to
the Administrator.  The  Administrator
shall  make a final  determination on
the request within 30 days after receiv-
ing any such additional information or
argument. If no additional information
or argument is submitted by the appli-
cant, the application shall be denied.
  (b) If the Administrator grants an ex-
emption request submitted pursuant to
§ 142.51, he shall notify the applicant of
his decision in writing. Such  notice
shall identify  the facility covered, and
shall  specify  the termination  date of
the exemption. Such notice shall pro-
vide that the  exemption will be termi-
nated  when the system  comes  into
compliance with the applicable regula-
tion,  and may be terminated  upon a
finding by the Administrator that the
system has  failed to comply with any
requirements of a final schedule issued
pursuant to § 142.55.
  (c) The Administrator shall propose a
schedule for:
  (1) Compliance (including increments
of progress  or measures to develop an
alternative source of water supply) by
the public water system with each con-
taminant level requirement or treat-
ment technique requirement  with re-
spect to  which  the  exemption  was
granted; and
  (2)  Implementation by  the  public
water system of such control measures
as the Administrator may req.uire for
each contaminant covered by the ex-
emption.
  (d) The schedule shall be prescribed
by the Administrator at the time the
exemption is  granted,  subsequent to
provision  of opportunity  for  hearing
pursuant to §142.54.

[41 FR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 52
PR 20675, June 2, 1987; 63 PR 43848, Aug. 14,
1998]

§142.54  Public hearings on exemption
    schedules.
  (a) Before a schedule proposed by the
Administrator pursuant to §142.53 may
take  effect,  the  Administrator shall
provide notice and opportunity for pub-
lic  hearing on the  schedule. A notice
given pursuant to the  preceding sen-
tence may cover  the  proposal of more
than one such schedule and a hearing
held pursuant to  such notice  shall in-
clude each of the schedules covered by
the notice.
  (b) Public notice of an  opportunity
for  hearing on an exemption  schedule
shall  be  circulated  in  a  manner de-
signed to inform  interested and poten-
tially interested  persons  of  the  pro-
posed schedule, and  shall include at
least the following:
  (1) Posting of a notice in the prin-
cipal  post  office  of each municipality
or area served by the public water sys-
tem, and publishing  of a  notice  in a
newspaper or newspapers of general cir-
culation in the area served by the pub-
lic water system.
  (2) Mailing of a notice to the agency
of the State in which the system is lo-
cated which  is  responsible  for the
State's water supply program and to
other appropriate State or local agen-
cies at the Administrator's discretion.
  (3) Such notices shall include a sum-
mary of  the  proposed  schedule and
shall  inform  interested persons  that
they may request a public hearing on
the proposed schedule.
                                    600

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.57
  (c) Requests for hearing may be sub-
mitted by any interested person  other
than a Federal agency. Frivolous  or in-
substantial requests for hearing  may
be  denied by  the  Administrator. Re-
quests must be submitted to the Ad-
ministrator   within  30  days  after
issuance of the public notices provided
for in  paragraph (b) of this section.
Such  requests shall  include  the fol-
lowing information:
  (1) The name, address and telephone
number of the individual,  organization
or other entity requesting a hearing;
  (2) A brief statement  of the interest
of the  person making the request in the
proposed  schedule  and of information
that the  requesting person intends to
submit at such hearing; and
  (3) The  signature  of  the  individual
making the request, or, if the request
is made on behalf of an organization or
other   entity,  the  signature   of  a
responsibile official of the  organization
or other entity.
  (d) The Administrator shall give no-
tice in the manner set forth  in  para-
graph  (b) of this section of any hearing
to be  held pursuant to  a  request sub-
mitted by an interested person or on
his own motion.  Notice of the hearing
shall   also be  sent  to the person re-
questing the hearing, if any.  Notice of
the hearing shall include  a  statement
of the  purpose of the hearing,  informa-
tion regarding the time and location of
the hearing,  and the address and tele-
phone  number of an office at which in-
terested persons may obtain further in-
formation concerning the hearing. At
least one hearing location specified in
the public notice shall be within the in-
volved State.  Notice of  the hearing
shall  be given not  less than 15 days
prior   to  the  time  scheduled for the
hearing.
  (e) A hearing convened  pursuant to
paragraph (d) of this section  shall be
conducted before a hearing officer to be
designated by  the Administrator. The
hearing shall be conducted by the hear-
ing officer in  an informal, orderly and
expeditious manner.  The hearing  offi-
cer shall have authority  to  call  wit-
nesses, receive oral and written testi-
mony  and take such action as may be
necessary  to assure the fair and  effi-
cient conduct of the hearing. Following
the conclusion of the hearing, the hear-
ing officer shall  forward the record of
the hearing to the Administrator.

[41 FR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 52
FR 20675, June 2, 1987]

§ 142.55  Final schedule.
  (a)  Within 30 days  after the  termi-
nation of the public hearing pursuant
to  §142.54,  the  Administrator  shall,
taking into consideration information
obtained  during  such  hearing,  revise
the proposed schedule as necessary and
prescribe the final schedule for compli-
ance and interim measures for the pub-
lic water system  granted an exemption
under § 142.52.
  (b) Such schedule  must require com-
pliance with each  contaminant level
and treatment technique requirement
with  respect to  which  the  exemption
was granted as expeditiously as prac-
ticable but not later than 3 years after
the  otherwise  applicable  compliance
date established in section 1412(b)(10) of
the Act.
  (c) [Reserved]

[41 FR 2918, Jan. 20, 1976, as amended at 52
FR 20675,  June 2, 1987; 63 FR 43848, Aug. 14,
1998]

§ 142.56  Extension of date  for compli-
    ance.
  In the  case of a public water system
which serves a population of not more
than 3,300 persons and which needs fi-
nancial  assistance  for  the necessary
improvements,  an  exemption granted
under  §142.50(b) (1)  or (2) may  be  re-
newed for one or  more additional  2-
year periods, but not to exceed a total
of 6  additional  years,  if  the   public
water system establishes that the pub-
lic  water system is taking  all prac-
ticable steps to meet the requirements
of section 1416(b)(2)(B) of the Act  and
the established compliance schedule.

[63 FR 43848, Aug. 14, 1998]

§142.57  Bottled   water, point-of-use,
   and point-of-entry devices.
  (a)  A  State  may  require  a   public
water  system  to use  bottled   water,
point-of-use devices, or point-of-entry
devices as a condition of granting an
exemption from  the  requirements  of
§§141.61 (a) and (c), and 141.62 of this
chapter.
                                     601

-------
§142.60
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (b) Public water  systems using bot-
tled water as  a condition of obtaining
an exemption from  the requirements of
§§141.61 (a) and (c) and 141.62(b) must
meet the requirements in §142.62(g).
  (c) Public  water systems that use
point-of-use or point-of-entry  devices
as a condition for receiving an exemp-
tion must meet  the  requirements  in
§141.62(h).
[56 FR 3596, Jan. 30, 1991, as amended at 56
FR 30280, July 1, 1991]

Subpart  G—Identification of  Best
    Technology,  Treatment  Tech-
    niques or Other Means Gen-
    erally Available

§ 142.60 Variances  from the maximum
    contaminant    level    for     total
    trihalomethan.es.
  (a) The Administrator,  pursuant  to
section 1415(a)(l)(A) of the  Act, hereby
identifies the following as the  best
technology, treatment  techiques  or
other  means  generally  available for
achieving compliance with the max-
imum   contaminant  level  for  total
trihalomethanes (§141.12(c)):
  (1) Use of chloramines as an alternate
or  supplemental  disinfectant  or oxi-
dant.
  (2) Use of chlorine  dioxide as an al-
ternate or supplemental disinfectant or
oxidant.
  (3) Improved existing clarification for
THM precursor reduction.
  (4) Moving the  point of chlorination
to reduce TTHM formation and, where
necessary,  substituting for the use  of
chlorine as a pre-oxidant chloramines,
chlorine  dioxide  or   potassium  per-
manganate.
  (5) Use of powdered activated carbon
for THM precursor  or TTHM reduction
seasonally or intermittently at  dosages
not to  exceed 10 mg/L on an annual av-
erage basis.
  (b) The Administrator in  a state that
does not have  primary enforcement re-
sponsibility or a state with primary en-
forcement   responsibility   (primacy
state)  that issues  variances shall re-
quire a community  water system to in-
stall and/or use any treatment  method
identified in  §142.60(a) as  a condition
for granting a variance unless the Ad-
ministrator or primacy  state  deter-
mines  that  such  treatment method
identified in  §142.60(a) is not available
and effective for TTHM control for the
system. A treatment method shall not
be considered to  be "available and ef-
fective" for an individual system if the
treatment method would  not be  tech-
nically  appropriate  and  technically
feasible for that system or would  only
result  in  a  marginal  reduction  in
TTHM for the system. If, upon applica-
tion by a system for  a variance, the
Administrator  or primacy state  that
issues variances determines that none
of the treatment  methods identified in
§142.60(a) is available and effective for
the system, that  system shall be enti-
tled to a variance under the provisions
of section 1415(a)(l)(A) of  the Act. The
Administrator's or primacy state's de-
termination as to the availability and
effectiveness  of such treatment  meth-
ods shall be based upon studies by the
system and other  relevant information.
If a system  submits information in-
tending to demonstrate that a  treat-
ment method is not available  and effec-
tive for TTHM control for that system,
the Administrator or  primacy  state
shall make a finding whether this in-
formation  supports a  decision   that
such treatment method is  not available
and effective  for that system  before re-
quiring  installation and/or use of  such
treatment method.
  (c) Pursuant to  § 142.43 (c) through (g)
or corresponding state regulations, the
Administrator  or primacy state  that
issues variances shall issue a schedule
of compliance  that may  require the
system  being granted the variance  to
examine the following treatment meth-
ods (1)  to determine  the probability
that any of these methods will signifi-
cantly reduce the level of TTHM for
that system,  and  (2) if such probability
exists, to determine  whether any  of
these methods are technically feasible
and economically reasonable, and  that
the TTHM reductions obtained will be
commensurate with the costs incurred
with the installation and use of such
treatment methods for that system:
  Introduction  of off-line water storage for
THM precursor reduction.
  Aeration for  TTHM reduction,  where geo-
graphically  and  environmentally  appro-
priate.
                                    602

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §142.61
  Introduction  of  clarification where not
currently practiced.
  Consideration of alternative sources of raw
water.
  Use of ozone as an alternate  or supple-
mental disinfectant or oxidant.

  (d) If the Administrator or  primacy
state that issues variances determines
that a treatment method identified in
§142.60(c)  is  technically  feasible,  eco-
nomically reasonable and will achieve
TTHM reductions commensurate with
the costs incurred with the installation
and/or use of such treatment method
for the system, the  Administrator or
primacy state shall require the system
to install and/or use  that treatment
method in connection  with a compli-
ance schedule issued under the  provi-
sions of section 1415(a)(l)(A) of the  Act.
The  Administrator's or primacy state's
determination  shall   be  based  upon
studies by the system and other  rel-
evant  information. In  no  event shall
the Administrator require a system to
install and/or use a treatment method
not described in §142.60 (a) or  (c)  to ob-
tain or maintain  a variance  from the
TTHM Rule or in connection  with any
variance compliance schedule.

[48 PR 8414, Feb. 28, 1983]

§ 142.61 Variances from the maximum
   contaminant level for fluoride.
  (a) The  Administrator,  pursuant to
section 1415(a)(l)(A) of  the Act, hereby
identifies   the  following as  the  best
technology,  treatment  techniques or
other  means generally  available for
achieving  compliance  with the Max-
imum Contaminant Level for fluoride.
  (1)  Activated  alumina  absorption,
centrally applied
  (2) Reverse osmosis, centrally applied
  (b) The Administrator in a state that
does not have primary  enforcement re-
sponsibility or a state with primary en-
forcement   responsibility   (primacy
state)  that issues variances  shall re-
quire a community water system to in-
stall and/or use any treatment method
identified  in §142.61(a)  as a condition
for granting  a variance unless the Ad-
ministrator or the primacy state  deter-
mines  that  such  treatment  method
identified  in §142.61(a)  as a condition
for granting a variance  is not  available
and  effective for  fluoride  control for
the system. A treatment method shall
not be considered to be "available and
effective" for  an individual system  if
the treatment method  would not be
technically   appropriate   and  tech-
nically  feasible  for  that  system.  If,
upon  application by  a system  for  a
variance, the  Administrator  or  pri-
macy state that issues variances deter-
mines that  none  of  the  treatment
methods  identified  in  §142.61(a)  are
available and  effective for the system,
that system shall be entitled to a vari-
ance  under  the  provisions  of section
1415(a)(l)(A) of the Act. The Adminis-
trator's or primacy  state's determina-
tion as to the availability and effec-
tiveness  of such treatment methods
shall  be based upon studies by the sys-
tem and other relevant information.  If
a system submits information to dem-
onstrate that a  treatment  method  is
not available and effective  for fluoride
control  for that  system, the Adminis-
trator or primacy state shall  make a
finding  whether  this information sup-
ports a decision that such treatment
method is not available and effective
for that system before requiring instal-
lation and/or  use of such  treatment
method.
  (c) Pursuant to §142.43 (c)-(g) or cor-
responding state regulations,  the Ad-
ministrator  or   primacy   state  that
issues variances  shall issue a schedule
of compliance that  may  require  the
system  being  granted the variance to
examine the following treatment meth-
ods (1)  to determine the  probability
that any of these methods will signifi-
cantly reduce  the level  of fluoride for
that system, and (2)  if such probability
exists, to determine  whether any of
these methods are technically feasible
and economically reasonable, and that
the fluoride reductions obtained will be
commensurate with  the costs incurred
with  the  installation  and use of such
treatment methods for that system:
  (1) Modification of lime softening;
  (2) Alum coagulation;
  (3) Electrodialysis;
  (4) Anion exchange resins;
  (5) Well field management;
  (6) Alternate source;
  (7) Regionalization.
  (d)  If  the Administrator  or primary
state  that issues variances determines
that a treatment method identified in
§ 142.61(c) or other treatment method  is
                                     603

-------
§142.62
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
technically feasible, economically rea-
sonable,  and will  achieve  fluoride re-
ductions commensurate with the costs
incurred with the installation  and/or
use of such treatment method for the
system, the Administrator or primacy
state shall require the system  to in-
stall and/or use that treatment method
in connection with a compliance sched-
ule issued under the provisions of sec-
tion 1415(a)(l)(A)  of the Act.  The Ad-
ministrator's or primacy state's deter-
mination shall be based upon studies
by the system and other relevant infor-
mation.
[51 PR 11411, Apr. 2, 1986]
§142.62 Variances   and   exemptions
   from the  maximum  contaminant
   levels  for organic  and  inorganic
   chemicals.
  (a) The  Administrator, pursuant  to
section 1415(a)(l)(A) of the Act hereby
identifies  the  technologies  listed  in
paragraphs (a)(l) through (a)(54) of this
section as the  best technology, treat-
ment techniques, or other means avail-
able  for achieving compliance with the
maximum contaminant levels for or-
ganic chemicals listed in §141.61 (a) and
(c):
Contaminant

(2) Cartoon tetrachlonde 	 	
(3) 1,2-Dichloroethane 	
(4) Trichloroethyiene ... . 	
(5) para-Dichlorobenzene 	 ... 	
(6) 1 1 -Dichloroetnytene
(7) 1,1,1-Tnchloroethane 	
(8) Vinyl chloride 	 ... 	
(9) cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 	
(10) 1 ,2-Dichloropropane 	 	 	
(11) Ethylbenzene 	 	 	
(13) o-Dichlorobenzene 	 	
(14) Styrene
(15) Tetrachloroethylene 	 	 	
(16) Toluene . 	 	 	
(17) trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene . . . 	
(18) Xylense (total)
(19)Alachlor .... .... .... 	
(20) Aldicarb .. .. 	 	 	
(21) Aldicarb sulfoxide 	 	
(22) Aldicarb sultone 	 	
(23) Atrazine 	 . 	
(24) Carbofuran 	 	
(25) Chlordane 	 	
(26) Dibromochloropropane . . 	 . . ....
(27) 2,4-D 	 ... 	
(28) Ethylene dibromide . . 	 	
(29) Heptachlor
(30) Heptachlor epoxide 	 	
(31) Lmdane 	 .... . 	
(32) Methoxychlor 	 	 	
(33) PCBs 	 	

(35) Toxaphene 	 	
(36) 2,4,5-TP 	 .... 	 	
(37) Benzo[a]pyrene 	 	 	
(38) Dalapon

(40) Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 	
(41) Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 	 	
(42) Dmoseb 	 	
(43) Diquat .... 	
(44) Endothall
(45) Endrin .... . . 	
(46) Glyphosate

(48) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 	 	
(49) Oxamyl (Vydate)
(50) Picloram ..... ... 	
(51) Simazine 	 	
Best available technologies
PTA'
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
GAC2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OX'
X
                                    604

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §142.62
Contaminant
(52) 1 ,2,4-Tnchlorobenzene
(53) 1,1,2-Tnchloroethane
(54) 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxm)
Best available technologies
PTAi
X
X
GAC2
X
X
X
OX1

  1 Packed Tower Aeration
  2 Granular Activated Carbon
  10xidation (Chlonnation or Ozonation)
  (b)  The  Administrator,  pursuant to
section 1415(a)(l)(A) of the Act, hereby
identifies  the  following as  the best
technology,  treatment techniques, or
other  means  available  for achieving
compliance  with  the maximum con-
taminant  levels  for  the  inorganic
chemicals listed in §141.62:

  BAT FOR INORGANIC COMPOUNDS LISTED IN
               §141.62(6)
         Chemical name
                                BAT(s)
Antimony
Arsenic4

Asbestos
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cyanide .
Mercury - . .
Nickel
Nitrite
Nitrate . ..
Selenium
Thallium
2,7
S1,2, 5, 6,7,
9, 12
2,3,8
5,6,7,9
1,2,5,6,7
2,5,6,7
2,5,62,7
5,7,10
21,4,61,7'
5,6,7
5,7,9
5,7
1,2 ',6,7,9
1,5
  1 BAT only if influent Hg concentrations <10ug/1
  2 BAT for Chromium III only
  3 BAT for Selenium IV only
  4 BATs for Arsenic V Pre-oxidation may be required to con-
vert Arsenic III to Arsenic V
  5 To obtain high removals, iron to arsenic ratto must be at
least 20 1

         Key to BATS in Table
1=Activated Alumina
2=Coagulation/Filtration (not BAT for sys-
  tems <500 service connections)
3=Direct and Diatomite Filtration
4= Granular Activated Carbon
5=Ion Exchange
6=Lime Softening (not BAT for systems <500
  service connections)
7=Reverse Osmosis
8=Corrosion Control
9=Electrodialysis
10=Chlorine
ll=Ultraviolet
12=Oxidation/Filtration

  (c) A  State shall require community
water systems and non-transient, non-
community  water systems  to install
and/or use any treatment method iden-
tified in §142.62 (a) and (b)  as a condi-
tion for granting a variance except as
provided in paragraph (d) of this  sec-
tion. If, after the system's installation
of the  treatment  method,  the system
cannot meet the MCL,  that system
shall be eligible for a variance  under
the provisions of section 1415(a)(l)(A) of
the Act.
  (d) If a system  can  demonstrate
through comprehensive engineering as-
sessments,  which may  include pilot
plant studies, that the treament meth-
ods  identified in  §142.62  (a)  and  (b)
would only achieve a de minimis reduc-
tion in contaminants, the  State may
issue a schedule of compliance that re-
quires  the system being granted  the
variance to  examine other  treatment
methods as  a condition  of obtaining
the variance.
  (e) If the  State  determines that a
treatment method identified in para-
graph  (d) of this section is  technically
feasible, the  Administrator  or primacy
State  may require the system to  in-
stall and/or use that treatment method
in connection with a compliance sched-
ule issued  under the provisions of  sec-
tion  1415(a)(l)(A)   of  the   Act.   The
State's determination shall be  based
upon studies  by  the system and other
relevant information.
  (f) The State may require a public
water  system to  use bottled  water,
point-of-use devices, point-of-entry de-
vices or other means as a condition of
granting a variance or an exemption
from the requirements of  §§141.61  (a)
and  (c) and 141.62, to avoid an unrea-
sonable risk  to health. The State may
require a public water system to  use
bottled water and point-of-use devices
or other means, but not point-of-entry
devices, as  a  condition for granting an
exemption  from   corrosion  control
treatment  requirements for lead  and
copper in §§141.81 and 141.82  to avoid an
unreasonable  risk to health. The State
                                      605

-------
§142.62
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
may require a public water system to
use point-of-entry devices as a condi-
tion for granting an  exemption  from
the source water and lead service line
replacement requirements for lead and
copper under §§141.83 or 141.84 to avoid
an unreasonable risk to health.
  (g)  Public water  systems that use
bottled water as a condition for receiv-
ing a variance or an  exemption  from
the requirements of §§141.61 (a)  and (c)
and 141.62, or an  exemption from the
requirements of  §§141.81-141.84  must
meet  the requirements specified in ei-
ther paragraph (g)(l) or (g)(2) and  para-
graph (g)(3) of this section:
  (1)  The  Administrator  or primacy
State must require and approve a  mon-
itoring  program for bottled water. The
public water system must develop and
put in place a monitoring program that
provides  reasonable  assurances  that
the bottled water meets all MCLs. The
public water system must monitor a
representative sample  of the  bottled
water for  all contaminants regulated
under §§141.61 (a) and (c) and 141.62 dur-
ing the  first three-month period that it
supplies the  bottled water to the pub-
lic, and annually thereafter. Results of
the monitoring program  shall be pro-
vided to the State annually.
  (2) The public water system must re-
ceive  a certification from the bottled
water company that the bottled water
supplied has been  taken from an  "ap-
proved  source" as defined  in  21  CFR
129.3(a); the bottled water company has
conducted monitoring  in  accordance
with 21 CPR 129.80(g) (1)  through  (3);
and the bottled water does not exceed
any MCLs or quality limits as set out
in 21 CFR 103.35, part 110, and part 129.
The public water system  shall provide
the certification to the State the first
quarter after it supplies bottled water
and annually thereafter. At the  State's
option a public water system may sat-
isfy  the  requirements  of  this  sub-
section  if an approved monitoring pro-
gram  is already in place  in  another
State.
  (3) The public water  system is  fully
responsible for the  provision of  suffi-
cient  quantities of bottled water to
every person supplied by  the public
water system via  door-to-door bottled
water delivery.
  (h)  Public water  systems  that use
point-of-use  or  point-of-entry devices
as a condition for obtaining a variance
or an  exemption from NPDWRs  must
meet the following requirements:
  (1) It is the responsibility of the pub-
lic water system to  operate and main-
tain the point-of-use  and/or  point-of-
entry treatment system.
  (2) Before point-of-use  or  point-of-
entry devices are installed, the public
water system must obtain the approval
of a  monitoring  plan which ensures
that the devices provide health protec-
tion equivalent  to  that provided  by
central water treatment.
  (3) The public  water system  must
apply  effective  technology  under  a
State-approved   plan.  The   micro-
biological safety of the water must be
maintained at all times.
  (4) The State must require  adequate
certification of performance, field test-
ing, and, if not included in the certifi-
cation process, a rigorous engineering
design review of the point-of-use and/or
point-of-entry devices.
  (5) The design and application of the
point-of-use  and/or  point-of-entry de-
vices  must  consider the potential for
increasing  concentrations  of hetero-
trophic bacteria in water treated with
activated carbon.  It may be necessary
to use  frequent backwashing,  post-con-
tactor disinfection, and Heterotrophic
Plate  Count monitoring to ensure that
the microbiological safety  of the water
is not compromised.
  (6) The State must  be assured that
buildings connected to the  system have
sufficient point-of-use  or point-of-entry
devices that are properly  installed,
maintained,  and monitored such that
all consumers will be protected.
  (7) In requiring the use of a point-of-
entry device as a condition for grant-
ing an exemption from the treatment
requirements for lead and copper under
§§141.83 or 141.84, the State must be as-
sured that use of the device will not
cause increased corrosion  of  lead and
copper bearing  materials  located be-
tween the device and the tap that could
increase contaminant levels at the tap.

[56 FR  3596, Jan. 30, 1991, as amended at  56
FR 26563, June 7, 1991;  57 FR 31848, July 17,
1992; 59 FR 33864, June 30, 1994; 59 FR 34325,
July 1, 1994; 66FR 7066, Jan. 22, 2001]
                                     606

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §142.65
  EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: At 69 FR 38857, June
29, 2004, § 142.62 was amended by removing the
citation "103.35"  and adding in  its place
"165.110", effective July 29, 2004.

§ 142.63  Variances  and   exemptions
    from  the  maximum contaminant
    level for total coliforms.
  (a) No variances or exemptions from
the  maximum  contaminant  level  in
§141.63 of this chapter are permitted.
  (b) EPA has stayed the effective date
of this section  relating to the total
coliform MCL of §141.63(a) of this chap-
ter for systems that  demonstrate  to
the  State  that the  violation  of the
total coliform  MCL is  due to  a per-
sistent  growth of total coliforms in the
distribution system  rather  than fecal
or pathogenic  contamination,  a treat-
ment lapse  or deficiency, or a problem
in the operation or maintenance of the
distribution system.

[54 FR 27568,  June 29, 1989, as amended at 56
FR 1557,  Jan. 15, 1991]

§ 142.64  Variances  and   exemptions
    from the requirements of part 141,
    subpart H—Filtration and Disinfec-
    tion.
  (a)  No  variances from the  require-
ments in part 141, subpart H  are per-
mitted.
  (b) No exemptions from the  require-
ments in §141.72 (a)(3) and (b)(2) to pro-
vide disinfection are permitted.
[54 FR 27540, June 29,  1989]

§142.65  Variances  and   exemptions
    from  the  maximum contaminant
    levels for radionuclides.
  (a)(l)  Variances and exemptions from
the maximum contaminant levels  for
combined  radium-226  and  radium-228,
uranium, gross alpha particle activity
(excluding  Radon  and  Uranium), and
beta particle and photon radioactivity.
  (i) The  Administrator,  pursuant  to
section 1415(a)(l)(A) of the Act, hereby
identifies  the  following  as  the  best
available technology,  treatment  tech-
niques, or  other means  available for
achieving  compliance with the  max-
imum  contaminant levels for the radio-
nuclides listed in §141.66(b), (c), (d), and
(e)  of  this chapter, for the purposes of
issuing variances  and  exemptions,  as
shown in Table A to this paragraph.

 TABLE  A—BAT FOR RADIONUCLIDES LISTED IN
                §141.66
      Contaminant
Combined radium-226 and ra-
  dium-228
Uranium
Gross alpha particle activity
  (excluding radon and ura-
  nium)
Beta particle and photon ra-
  dioactivity
                            BAT
Ion exchange, reverse osmo-
 sis, lime softening
Ion exchange, reverse osmo-
 sis, lime softening, coagu-
 lation/Mtration
Reverse osmosis
Ion exchange, reverse osmo-
 sis
  (ii) In  addition,  the  Administrator
hereby  identifies the following as the
best available  technology,  treatment
techniques, or  other means  available
for  achieving  compliance  with  the
maximum contaminant  levels for the
radionuclides listed in  §141.66(b), (c),
(d), and (e) of this chapter, for the pur-
poses of issuing variances and exemp-
tions to small drinking water systems,
defined here as those serving 10,000 per-
sons or fewer, as shown in Table C to
this paragraph.
    TABLE B—LIST OF SMALL SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES FOR RADIONUCLIDES AND
                                LIMITATIONS TO USE
Unit technologies
1 Ion exchange (IE)
2 Point of use (POU2) IE
3 Reverse osmosis (RO)

4 POU 2 RO

5 Lime softening
6 Green sand filtration
7 Co-precipitation with barium sulfate

8 Electrodialysis/electrodialysis reversal
9 Pre-formed hydrous manganese
oxide filtration
Limitations
(see foot-
notes)
(a)
(b)
(c)

(»)

(d)
C)
C)


w

Operator skill level required 1
Intermediate
Basic .
Advanced

Basic

Advanced
Basic
Intermediate to Advanced

Basic to Intermediate
Intermediate

Raw water quality range &
considerations 1
All ground waters
All ground waters
Surface waters usually require pre-fil-
tration
Surface waters usually require pre-fil-
tration
All waters

Ground waters with suitable water
quality
All ground waters
AH ground waters

                                      607

-------
§ 142.65
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
     TABLE B—LIST OF SMALL SYSTEMS COMPLIANCE TECHNOLOGIES FOR RADIONUCLIDES AND
                              LIMITATIONS TO USE—Continued
Unit technologies

11. Enhanced coagulation/filtration 	
Limitations
(see foot-
notes)
(a) (n)
(')
Operator skill level required 1

Advanced ...
Raw water quality range &
considerations '

concentrations may affect regenera-
tion frequency
Can treat a wide range of water quali-
ties
  1 National Research Council (NRC) Safe Water from Every Tap Improving Water Service to Small Communities National
Academy Press. Washington, D.C. 1997.
  2 A POU, or "point-of-use" technology is a treatment device installed at a single tap used for the purpose of reducing contami-
nants in drinking water at that one tap. POU devices are typically installed at the kitchen tap  See the April 21, 2000 NODA for
more details
  Limitations Footnotes. Technologies for Radionuclides
  "The regeneration solution contains high concentrations of the contaminant ions Disposal options should be carefully consid-
ered before choosing this technology
  "When POU devices are used for compliance, programs for long-term  operation, maintenance, and monitoring must be pro-
vided by water utility to ensure proper performance
  c Reject water disposal options should be carefully considered before choosing this technology See other RO limitations de-
scribed in the SWTR compliance technologies table.
  "The combination of variable source water quality and the  complexity  of the water chemistry involved may ma
-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.76
point-of-use devices,  point-of-entry de-
vices or other means as a condition of
granting  a variance  or an  exemption
from the requirements of §141.66 of this
chapter, to avoid an  unreasonable risk
to health.
  (6)  Community water  systems that
use bottled water as a condition for re-
ceiving  a variance  or  an  exemption
from the requirements of §141.66 of this
chapter  must meet  the  requirements
specified   in  either  §142.62(g)(l)   or
§142.62(g)(2)and(g)(3).
  (7)  Community water  systems that
use  point-of-use or point-of-entry  de-
vices as  a condition for obtaining a
variance  or  an exemption from the
radionuclides  NPDWRs must meet the
conditions  in   §142.62(h)(l)  through
  (b) [Reserved]

[65 FR 76751, Dec. 7, 2000]

      Subpart H— Indian Tribes

  SOURCE: 53 FR 37411, Sept. 26, 1988, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 142.72  Requirements for Tribal eligi-
    bility.
  The  Administrator  is authorized to
treat  an Indian  tribe  as  eligible to
apply for primary enforcement for the
Public Water System Program and the
authority to  waive the mailing require-
ments of §141.155(a) if it meets the fol-
lowing criteria:
  (a) The Indian Tribe is recognized by
the Secretary of the Interior.
  (b) The Indian Tribe has a tribal gov-
erning body  which is currently "car-
rying out substantial governmental du-
ties and powers"  over  a defined  area,
(i.e., is  currently performing govern-
mental  functions  to  promote  the
health, safety, and welfare of  the  af-
fected population within a defined geo-
graphic area).
  (c)  The  Indian Tribe demonstrates
that the functions to be performed in
regulating the  public water  systems
that the applicant intends  to regulate
are within the area of the Indian Tribal
government's jurisdiction.
  (d) The Indian Tribe is reasonably ex-
pected to be capable, in the  Adminis-
trator's judgment, of administering (in
a manner  consistent  with the  terms
and purposes of the Act and all applica-
ble  regulations)  an  effective  Public
Water System program.
[53 FR 37411, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 59
FR 64344, Dec. 14, 1994; 63 FR 44535, Aug. 19,
1998]

§142.76 Request  by an  Indian Tribe
    for a determination of eligibility.
  An Indian Tribe may apply to  the Ad-
ministrator for a determination that it
meets the criteria of section 1451 of the
Act. The  application  shall be  concise
and describe how the Indian Tribe will
meet  each  of the  requirements   of
§142.72. The application shall consist of
the following information:
  (a) A statement that the Tribe is rec-
ognized by the  Secretary of the  Inte-
rior.
  (b)  A descriptive  statement  dem-
onstrating that  the Tribal governing
body is currently carrying out substan-
tial governmental duties and  powers
over  a, defined area. The  statement
should:
  (1) Describe  the form of the Tribal
government;
  (2)  Describe   the  types  of   govern-
mental functions currently performed
by  the Tribal governing body such  as,
but not limited to, the exercise of po-
lice powers affecting  (or relating  to)
the health,  safety, and welfare of the
affected population; taxation;  and the
exercise of  the power of eminent do-
main; and
  (3) Identify the sources of the Tribal
government's authority to  carry out
the governmental functions currently
being performed.
  (c) A map or legal description of the
area over which the Indian Tribe  as-
serts jurisdiction; a statement by the
Tribal Attorney General (or equivalent
official) which describes  the basis  for
the Tribe's jurisdictional  assertion (in-
cluding the nature or subject matter of
the  asserted jurisdiction);  a copy of
those documents  such as Tribal con-
stitutions, by-laws, charters, executive
orders,  codes, ordinances, and/or  reso-
lutions  which  the Tribe believes are
relevant to its  assertions regarding  ju-
risdiction; and  a description of the  lo-
cations of the public water systems the
Tribe proposes to regulate.
  (d) A  narrative statement describing
the capability  of the  Indian Tribe to
                                     609

-------
§142.78
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
administer an  effective Public Water
System program. The narrative state-
ment should include:
  (1) A description of the Indian Tribe's
previous   management    experience
which may include, the administration
of programs and services authorized by
the  Indian  Self-Determination   and
Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450
et seg.),  the  Indian Mineral  Develop-
ment Act (25 U.S.C. 2101 et seg.), or the
Indian Sanitation Facilities Construc-
tion Activity Act (42 U.S.C. 2004a).
  (2) A  list of  existing environmental
or  public  health programs  adminis-
tered by the Tribal governing body and
a copy  of related Tribal laws, regula-
tions and policies.
  (3) A description of the Indian Tribe's
accounting and procurement systems.
  (4) A description of the entity (or en-
tities)  which exercise  the executive,
legislative, and judicial  functions of
the Tribal government.
  (5) A  description of the existing, or
proposed, agency  of the  Indian Tribe
which  will  assume  primary  enforce-
ment responsibility,  including a de-
scription of  the  relationship between
owners/operators  of the  public water
systems and the agency.
  (6) A description of the technical and
administrative  capabilities of the  staff
to administer and manage an effective
Public  Water  System  Program   or  a
plan which proposes how the Tribe will
acquire additional administrative  and/
or technical  expertise.  The plan must
address how  the Tribe  will obtain the
funds to acquire the additional admin-
istrative and technical expertise.
  (e) The Administrator may, in his
discretion, request further documenta-
tion necessary  to support a Tribe's eli-
gibility.
  (f) If  the  Administrator has  pre-
viously determined  that a Tribe has
met the prerequisites that make it eli-
gible to assume a role  similar to  that
of a state as  provided by statute under
the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean
Water Act, or the Clean Air Act,  then
that Tribe need provide only that in-
formation unique  to the  Public Water
System program (paragraphs (c), (d)(5)
and (6) of this section).

[53 FR 37411, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 59
FE 64344, Dec. 14,  1994]
§ 142.78  Procedure for processing an
   Indian Tribe's application.
  (a) The Administrator shall process a
completed  application of  an  Indian
Tribe in a timely manner. He shall
promptly notify the Indian Tribe of re-
ceipt of the application.
  (b) A  tribe that meets the require-
ments of § 141.72 of this chapter is eligi-
ble to apply for  development  grants
and  primacy  enforcement  responsi-
bility for a Public Water System Pro-
gram and associated funding  under sec-
tion  1443(a) of the Act and for primary
enforcement  responsibility for  public
water systems under section 1413 of the
Act and for the authority to waive the
mailing requirement of §141.155(a)  of
this chapter.
[53 FR 37411  Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 59
FR 64345, Dec.  14, 1994; 63 FR 71376,  Dec.  28,
1998]

Subpart I—Administrator's Review
     of State Decisions that Imple-
     ment  Criteria Under Which Fil-
     tration Is Required

  SOURCE: 54 FR  27540, June 29,  1989, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 142.80  Review procedures.
  (a) The Administrator may initiate a
comprehensive  review of the decisions
made by States with primary enforce-
ment responsibility to determine,  in
accordance with §141.71 of this chapter,
if public water systems using surface
water sources  must provide filtration
treatment.   The Administrator shall
complete this review within one  year of
its initiation and shall schedule subse-
quent reviews as (s)he deems  necessary.
  (b) EPA shall publish notice of a pro-
posed review  in the FEDERAL REGISTER.
Such notice must:
  (1) Provide  information regarding the
location of data and other information
pertaining  to  the review to be  con-
ducted and other information including
new  scientific  matter bearing  on the
application of the criteria for avoiding
filtration; and
  (2) Advise  the public of  the  oppor-
tunity to submit comments.
  (c) Upon  completion of any such re-
view, the  Administrator shall  notify
each State affected by the  results  of
                                    610

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §142.81
the review and  shall make the results
available to the public.

§ 142.81  Notice to the State.
  (a)   If  the   Administrator   finds
through periodic review or other avail-
able information  that  a State (1) has
abused its discretion in applying the
criteria  for  avoiding filtration under
§141.71 of this chapter in determining
that a system does not have to provide
filtration treatment, or (2) has failed to
prescribe  compliance   schedules  for
those systems which must provide fil-
tration  in   accordance  with  section
1412(b)(7)(C)(ii) of the Act, (s)he  shall
notify the State of these findings. Such
notice shall:
  (1) Identify each public water system
for which the Administrator finds the
State has abused its discretion;
  (2) Specify the reasons for the find-
ing;
  (3) As  appropriate, propose that the
criteria of §141.71 of this chapter be ap-
plied properly to determine  the need
for a public  water  system to provide
filtration treatment or propose a re-
vised schedule for compliance by the
public water  system with the filtration
treatment requirements;
  (b) The Administrator shall also no-
tify the  State that a public hearing is
to be held on the provisions of the no-
tice required by paragraph (a) of this
section.  Such notice shall  specify the
time  and location of the hearing.  If,
upon  notification of a finding by the
Administrator  that  the  State  has
abused its discretion under §141.71 of
this chapter,  the State takes corrective
action  satisfactory  to  the  Adminis-
trator, the Administrator may rescind
the notice to the  State  of a public
hearing.
  (c) The Administrator shall publish
notice of the  public hearing in the FED-
ERAL  REGISTER  and in  a newspaper of
general  circulation  in the  involved
State, including a summary of the find-
ings made pursuant  to paragraph (a) of
this section,  a statement of the time
and location for the hearing, and the
address and telephone number of an of-
fice at which interested persons may
obtain further information concerning
the hearing.
  (d)  Hearings  convened pursuant  to
paragraphs (b) and  (c) of this section
shall be conducted before a hearing of-
ficer to be designated by the Adminis-
trator. The hearing  shall be conducted
by the hearing officer in an informal,
orderly,  and expeditious manner.  The
hearing officer shall have the authority
to call witnesses, receive oral and writ-
ten testimony, and take such other ac-
tion as may be necessary to ensure the
fair  and efficient  conduct of the hear-
ing.  Following the  conclusion of the
hearing, the hearing officer may make
a  recommendation  to  the  Adminis-
trator based  on  the testimony  pre-
sented at the hearing and shall forward
any  such   recommendation  and  the
record of the  hearing to the Adminis-
trator.
  (e) Within 180 days after the date no-
tice  is given pursuant to paragraph (b)
of  this  section,  the  Administrator
shall:
  (1) Rescind the notice to the State of
a public hearing if the State takes  cor-
rective  action satisfactory to the  Ad-
ministrator; or
  (2) Rescind the finding for which the
notice was given  and promptly notify
the State of such rescission; or
  (3) Uphold the finding for which the
notice was given. In this event, the Ad-
ministrator shall revoke the State's
decision  that filtration was  not re-
quired or revoke the compliance sched-
ule approved by the  State, and promul-
gate, as appropriate,  with  any appro-
priate  modifications,  a  revised filtra-
tion decision  or  compliance schedule
and promptly notify the State of such
action.
  (f) Revocation of a State's filtration
decision  or compliance schedule and/or
promulgation of a revised filtration de-
cision  or  compliance  schedule  shall
take effect  90 days  after the State is
notified under paragraph (e)(3) of  this
section.

       Subpart J [Reserved]

  Subpart K—Variances for Small
              System

  SOURCE: 63 PR 43848, Aug. 14, 1998,  unless
otherwise noted.
                                     611

-------
§142.301
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
         GENERAL PROVISIONS

§142.301 What is a small system vari-
    ance?
  Section 1415(e)  of the Act authorizes
the issuance of variances from the re-
quirement to comply with a maximum
contaminant level  or treatment tech-
nique to systems serving fewer than
10,000 persons. The purpose of this sub-
part is  to provide  the procedures and
criteria for  obtaining these variances.
The regulations  in  this subpart shall
take effect on September 14,1998.

§ 142.302 Who can issue a small system
    variance?
  A small system variance under this
subpart may only be issued by either:
  (a) A State that is exercising primary
enforcement responsibility under Sub-
part B for public water systems under
the State's jurisdiction; or
  (b) The Administrator, for a public
water system in a State which does not
have  primary  enforcement  responsi-
bility.

§142.303 Which size public water sys-
    tems can receive a small  system
    variance?
  (a) A State exercising primary en-
forcement   responsibility  for   public
water systems  (or the Administrator
for other systems)  may grant a small
system  variance  to public water  sys-
tems serving 3,300 or fewer persons.
  (b) With the approval of the Adminis-
trator pursuant to §142.312, a State ex-
ercising primary  enforcement responsi-
bility for public water  systems may
grant a small system variance  to pub-
lic  water systems  serving more than
3,300 persons but  fewer than 10,000 per-
sons.
  (c) In determining the number of per-
sons served by the public water system,
the State or Administrator  must in-
clude persons  served  by consecutive
systems.  A small  system  variance
granted to a public water system would
also apply to any consecutive  system
served by it.
§142.304 For which of the regulatory
    requirements is a small system vari-
    ance available?
  (a) A small system  variance  is not
available under  this subpart for a na-
tional  primary drinking water regula-
tion for a  microbial contaminant (in-
cluding a bacterium, virus, or other or-
ganism) or an indicator or treatment
technique for a microbial contaminant.
  (b) A small system variance under
this subpart is otherwise only available
for compliance  with  a  requirement
specifying  a  maximum  contaminant
level or treatment technique for a con-
taminant with respect to which;
  (1) a  national primary drinking water
regulation was promulgated on or after
January 1,1986; and
  (2) the Administrator has published a
small system variance technology pur-
suant to Section 1412(b)(15) of the Act.

  NOTE  TO PARAGRAPH (B)(l): Small  system
variances are not available for public water
systems above the pre-1986 maximum con-
taminant level even if subsequently revised.
If the Agency revises a pre-1986 maximum
contaminant level  and makes it more strin-
gent, then a variance would be available for
that contaminant, but only up to the pre-
1986 maximum contaminant level.

§142.305 When  can  a small  system
    variance be granted by a State?
  No small system variance can  be
granted by a  State until the later  of
the following:
  (a) 90 days after the State proposes to
grant the small system variance;
  (b) If a State is proposing to grant a
small  system  variance to  a  public
water system serving 3,300 or fewer per-
sons and the Administrator objects to
the small system variance, the date on
which   the   State   makes  the rec-
ommended  modifications  or responds
in writing to each objection; or
  (c) If a State is proposing to grant a
small  system variance to  a  public
water  system  serving a  population
more than  3,300  and fewer than  10,000
persons, the date the Administrator ap-
proves the  small system variance. The
Administrator must  approve or dis-
approve the  variance  within 90 days
after it is  submitted to the Adminis-
trator for review.
                                    612

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §142.307
  REVIEW OF SMALL SYSTEM VARIANCE
             APPLICATION

§ 142.306 What are the responsibilities
    of  the  public  water system, State
    and the Administrator in ensuring
    that sufficient information is avail-
    able  and for evaluation of a small
    system variance application?
  (a) A public water system requesting
a small system variance must provide
accurate and correct information  to
the State or the Administrator to issue
a small system variance in accordance
with, this subpart.  A State may assist a
public  water system in compiling infor-
mation required for the State  or  the
Administrator to issue a small system
variance in accordance with  this sub-
part.
  (b) Based upon  an application for a
small system variance and other infor-
mation,  and  before a small system
variance may be  proposed under this
subpart,  the  State  or  the  Adminis-
trator  must find and document the  fol-
lowing:
  (1) The public water system is eligi-
ble for a small system variance pursu-
ant to  §§142.303 (i.e., the system serves
a population of fewer than 10,000 per-
sons) and 142.304 (i.e., the contaminant
for which the  small  system variance is
sought is not excluded from variance
eligibility);
  (2) The public water system cannot
afford  to comply, in accordance with
the affordability  criteria established
by the State (or by the Administrator
in States which do not have primary
enforcement  responsibility),  with  the
national primary drinking water regu-
lation  for which a small  system vari-
ance is sought, including by:
  (i) Treatment;
  (ii) Alternative sources of water sup-
ply;
  (iii)  Restructuring or consolidation
changes, including  ownership change
and/or  physical consolidation with  an-
other public water system; or
  (iv)   Obtaining   financial assistance
pursuant to Section 1452 of the Act or
any other Federal  or State program;
  (3) The public  water system meets
the source  water quality requirements
for installing the small system vari-
ance technology developed pursuant to
guidance   published  under   section
1412(b)(15) of the Act;
  (4) The public water system is finan-
cially  and technically capable of in-
stalling, operating and maintaining the
applicable small system variance tech-
nology; and
  (5) The  terms and conditions of the
small  system  variance, as  developed
through compliance with §142.307, en-
sure  adequate  protection  of human
health, considering the following:
  (i) The  quality  of the source water
for the public water system; and
  (ii) Removal efficiencies and expected
useful life of the small system variance
technology.

§142.307 What  terms and  conditions
   must be included in a small system
   variance?
  (a)  A State or  the Administrator
must clearly specify enforceable terms
and conditions of a small system vari-
ance.
  (b)  The  terms and  conditions  of  a
small  system  variance  issued under
this  subpart must include, at a min-
imum, the following requirements:
  (1) Proper and effective installation,
operation  and maintenance of the ap-
plicable small system variance  tech-
nology  in  accordance  with  guidance
published  by the Administrator pursu-
ant  to  section 1412(b)(15) of  the  Act,
taking into consideration any relevant
source water  characteristics  and any
other site-specific  conditions that may
affect  proper  and  effective  operation
and maintenance of the technology;
  (2) Monitoring requirements, for the
contaminant for which a small system
variance is sought,  as specified in 40
CFR part 141; and
  (3)  Any  other  terms  or  conditions
that are necessary to  ensure  adequate
protection  of public health, which may
include:
  (i)  Public  education  requirements;
and
  (ii) Source water protection require-
ments.
  (c) The  State or the Administrator
must establish a schedule for the  pub-
lic water  system  to comply  with  the
terms and conditions of the small sys-
tem  variance which must include, at a
minimum,  the following requirements:
  (1) Increments of progress, such  as
milestone  dates for the public water
                                    613

-------
§142.308
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
system  to apply for financial  assist-
ance and beg-in capital improvements;
  (2) Quarterly reporting to  the State
or Administrator of  the  public water
system's  compliance with  the  terms
and  conditions  of  the  small  system
variance;
  (3) Schedule for the State or the Ad-
ministrator to review the small system
variance under  paragraph (d)  of this
section; and
  (4) Compliance with the  terms and
conditions of the  small system vari-
ance as  soon as practicable but not
later than 3 years after the date on
which  the small system  variance  is
granted.  The Administrator or  State
may allow up to 2  additional years if
the Administrator or State determines
that additional  time is  necessary  for
the public water system to:
  (i) Complete necessary capital im-
provements to comply with  the small
system variance technology,  secure an
alternative source of water, or restruc-
ture or consolidate;  or
  (ii) Obtain financial assistance pro-
vided pursuant to  section 1452  of the
Act or any other Federal or State pro-
gram.
  (d) The State or  the Administrator
must review each small system vari-
ance granted not less often than every
5 years after the compliance date  es-
tablished in the  small system variance
to determine whether the public water
system  continues  to meet  the  eligi-
bility criteria and remains eligible  for
the small system variance and is com-
plying with the terms and conditions of
the small system variance. If the pub-
lic water system would no longer be el-
igible for  a small system variance, the
State or the Administrator must deter-
mine whether continuing the variance
is in the public interest. If the State or
the  Administrator  finds  that con-
tinuing the variance is not in the pub-
lic interest, the variance must be with-
drawn.

        PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

§142.308  What  public  notice   is  re-
    quired before a State or the Admin-
    istrator proposes  to  issue a small
    system variance?
  (a) At  least fifteen (15) days  before
the date of proposal, and at least thirty
(30) days prior to a public meeting  to
discuss the proposed small system vari-
ance, the State, Administrator, or pub-
lic  water system as directed by the
State or Administrator, must provide
notice to all persons served by the pub-
lic water system. For billed customers,
identified in paragraph (a)(l) of this
section, this notice must  include the
information listed in paragraph (c)  of
this section. For other persons  regu-
larly served by the system,  identified
in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the
notice shall  include  the information
identified in paragraph (d) of this sec-
tion.  Notice  must be provided to all
persons served by:
  (1) Direct mail or other home deliv-
ery to billed customers or other service
connections, and
  (2) Any other method reasonably cal-
culated to notify, in a brief and concise
manner, other persons regularly served
by the system. Such methods may in-
clude publication in a local newspaper,
posting in public places or delivery  to
community organizations.
  (b) At the time  of proposal, the State
must publish a  notice  in  the State
equivalent to the FEDERAL REGISTER or
a newspaper or newspapers of wide cir-
culation in the State, or, in the case of
the  Administrator,  in  the   FEDERAL
REGISTER. This notice shall include the
information listed in paragraph (c)  of
this section.
  (c)  The notice in paragraphs  (a)(l)
and (b) of this section must include,  at
a minimum, the following:
  (1)     Identification    of    the
contaminant[s] for which a small sys-
tem variance is sought;
  (2) A brief statement of the health ef-
fects      associated     with     the
contaminant[s] for which a small sys-
tem variance is sought using language
in Appendix C of  Part 141 Subpart O of
this chapter;
  (3) The address and telephone number
at which interested persons may obtain
further  information  concerning  the
contaminant and the  small  system
variance;
  (4) A brief summary, in easily under-
standable terms,  of the terms and con-
ditions of the small system variance;
  (5) A description of the consumer pe-
tition process under §142.310 and infor-
mation  on  contacting the  EPA Re-
gional Office;
                                    614

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §142.311
  (6) a brief statement announcing the
public   meeting   required   under
§142.309(a), including a  statement  of
the purpose  of the meeting,  informa-
tion regarding the time  and location
for the meeting, and the address and
telephone number at which interested
persons may  obtain  further  informa-
tion concerning the meeting; and
  (7) In communities with a large pro-
portion of non-English-speaking  resi-
dents, as determined by  the primacy
agency, information in the appropriate
language regarding the content and im-
portance of the notice.
  (d) The notice in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section must provide  sufficient in-
formation to alert readers to the pro-
posed variance and direct them where
to receive additional information.
  (e) At its option, the State or the Ad-
ministrator may choose to issue sepa-
rate notices  or  additional notices re-
lated  to  the proposed small  system
variance,  provided that  the require-
ments in paragraphs (a) through (d) of
this section are satisfied.
  (f) Prior to promulgating  the final
variance,  the State or  the  Adminis-
trator must  respond in writing to all
significant public comments  received
relating to the small  system variance.
Response  to  public comment and any
other documentation  supporting the
issuance of a variance must be made
available to the public after  final pro-
mulgation.

§ 142.309 What are the public meeting
    requirements associated  with the
    proposal  of  a small  system vari-
    ance?
  (a)  A  State or  the  Administrator
must provide for at least one (1) public
meeting on the small system variance
no later than 15 days after the small
system variance is proposed.
  (b) At the time of the public meeting,
the State or  Administrator must  pre-
pare and  make  publicly available,  in
addition to the  information listed  in
§ 142.308(c), either:
  (1) The  proposed small  system vari-
ance, if the public meeting occurs after
proposal of the small system variance;
or
  (2) A draft of the proposed small sys-
tem variance, if the public meeting oc-
curs prior to proposal of the proposed
small system variance.
  (c) Notice of the public meeting must
be  provided  in the  manner  required
under §142.308  at least 30 days in  ad-
vance of the public meeting. This  no-
tice must be provided by the State,  the
Administrator, or the public water sys-
tem as directed by the State or Admin-
istrator.

§ 142.310 How  can  a person served by
    the public water system obtain EPA
    review  of a State proposed  small
    system variance?
  (a) Any person served by the public
water system may petition the Admin-
istrator to object to the granting of a
small system variance within  30 days
after a State proposes to grant a small
system variance for a public water sys-
tem.
  (b) The Administrator must  respond
to a petition filed by any person served
by the public water system and deter-
mine  whether  to object to the small
system  variance  under  §142.311,  no
later than 60 days after the receipt of
the petition.

 EPA REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SMALL
         SYSTEM VARIANCES

§142.311 What  procedures allow  the
    Administrator to object to a pro-
    posed small  system  variance  or
    overturn  a  granted small  system
    variance for a public water system
    serving 3,300 or fewer persons?
  (a) At the time a State proposes to
grant a small  system variance under
this subpart, the State must submit to
the Administrator the proposed small
system variance and all supporting  in-
formation, including any written pub-
lic  comments  received prior  to pro-
posal.
  (b) The Administrator may review
and object to any proposed small sys-
tem variance within 90 days of receipt
of the proposed small system variance.
The Administrator  must notify  the
State in writing of  each basis  for  the
objection and propose a  modification
to the small system variance to resolve
the concerns of the Administrator. The
State must make   the  recommended
modification,  respond  in  writing  to
                                    615

-------
§142.312
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
each objection,  or withdraw the pro-
posal to grant the small system vari-
ance.
  (c) If the State issues the  small sys-
tem variance  without  resolving  the
concerns of the Administrator, the Ad-
ministrator may overturn the State de-
cision  to grant the variance  if the Ad-
ministrator determines that the State
decision does not comply with the Act
or this rule.

§ 142.312 What EPA action is necessary
    when a State  proposes to grant a
    small system variance to a public
    water system serving a population
    of more than 3,300 and fewer than
    10,000 persons?
  (a) At the time a State proposes to
grant  a small system variance to  a
public  water  system serving  a popu-
lation  of more than  3,300 and fewer
than  10,000 persons,  the  State must
submit the proposed small system vari-
ance and all  supporting information,
including  public  comments received
prior  to  proposal,  to  the   Adminis-
trator.
  (b) The Administrator must approve
or disapprove the small system vari-
ance within 90 days of receipt of the
proposed small system variance  and
supporting information. The  Adminis-
trator  must approve the  small  system
variance if it  meets each requirement
within the  Act and this rule.
  (c) If the Administrator disapproves
the small system variance, the Admin-
istrator must  notify the State in writ-
ing of  the  reasons for disapproval  and
the small system variance does not be-
come effective. The State may resub-
mit the small system  variance for re-
view and approval with modifications
to address  the objections stated by the
Administrator.

§142.313 How will the Administrator
    review  a State's program  under this
    subpart?
  (a) The Administrator must periodi-
cally review each  State program under
this subpart  to  determine  whether
small system variances granted by the
State comply with the requirements of
the Act, this rule  and the affordability
criteria developed by the State.
  (b) If the Administrator determines
that small  system variances granted by
a State are not in compliance with the
requirements of the Act, this rule or
the affordability criteria developed by
the State, the Administrator shall no-
tify  the  State  in writing of the  defi-
ciencies  and make  public  the deter-
minations.
  (c) The Administrator's review will
be based in part on quarterly reports
prepared by the  States pursuant  to
§142.15(a)(l)  relating to violations of in-
crements of progress or  other violated
terms  or conditions  of  small system
variances.

PART 143—NATIONAL  SECONDARY
  DRINKING WATER REGULATIONS

Sec
143.1  Purpose.
143.2  Definitions.
143.3  Secondary maximum contaminant lev-
   els.
143.4  Monitoring1.
  AUTHORITY:  42 U.S.C. 300f et seg.
  SOURCE: 44  FR 42198, July 19,  1979, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 143.1  Purpose.
  This  part establishes  National  Sec-
ondary  Drinking Water  Regulations
pursuant to section 1412  of the  Safe
Drinking Water  Act,  as amended  (42
U.S.C.  300g-l).  These regulations con-
trol  contaminants in  drinking water
that primarily   affect  the  aesthetic
qualities relating to the public accept-
ance of  drinking water. At consider-
ably higher concentrations  of  these
contaminants,   health   implications
may also exist as well as aesthetic deg-
radation. The regulations are not Fed-
erally enforceable but are intended as
guidelines for the States.

§ 143.2  Definitions.
  (a)  Act means  the  Safe Drinking
Water Act as amended (42 U.S.C. 300f et
seq.).
  (b) Contaminant means any physical,
chemical, biological,  or  radiological
substance or matter in water.
  (c) Public  water system means a sys-
tem  for the provision  to the public of
piped water for human consumption, if
such a system has at least fifteen serv-
ice connections  or regularly serves an
average of at least twenty-five individ-
uals  daily at least 60  days out of the
                                     616

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                    §143.4
year. Such term includes (1) any collec-
tion, treatment,  storage, and distribu-
tion facilities under control of the op-
erator of such system and  used pri-
marily in connection with such system,
and (2) any collection or pretreatment
storage facilities not under such con-
trol which are used primarily in con-
nection  with such system.  A public
water system is either a "community
water system"  or  a  "non-community
water system."
  (d) State means the  agency  of  the
State or Tribal government which has
jurisdiction over public water systems.
During any period  when a State does
not have  responsibility pursuant  to
section  1443  of  the  Act,  the  term
"State" means the  Regional  Adminis-
trator, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
  (e) Supplier of water means any person
who owns or operates a public  water
system.
  (f)  Secondary  maximum contaminant
levels means  SMCLs  which  apply  to
public water systems and which, in the
judgement of  the Administrator,  are
requisite to protect the public welfare.
The SMCL  means the maximum per-
missible  level of  a  contaminant  in
water which  is  delivered to  the free
flowing outlet of the ultimate user of
public water  system.   Contamimants
added  to   the   water  under  cir-
cumstances controlled by the user, ex-
cept those resulting from corrosion of
piping and plumbing caused  by  water
quality, are excluded from this defini-
tion.
[44 PR 42198, July 19, 1979, as amended at 53
PR 37412, Sept. 26, 1988]

§ 143.3 Secondary maximum  contami-
    nant levels.
  The  secondary maximum  contami-
nant levels for public water systems
are as follows:
                          Contaminant
     Contaminant
Aluminum ..
Chloride
Color
Copper .  .
Corrosivity
Fluoride 	
                           Level
0.05 to 0 2 mg/l
250 mg/l
15 color units
1.0 mg/l.
Non-corrosive
2.0 mg/l.
                     Foaming agents
                     Iron     .  .
                     Manganese  .
                     Odor      	
                     pH      	
                     Silver    ...
                     Sulfate
                     Total dissolved solids (TDS)
                     Zinc
                                                Level
                    05 mg/l.
                    03 mg/l
                    0.05 mg/l.
                    3 threshold odor number
                    6.5-8.5.
                    0 1 mg/l.
                    250 mg/l
                    500 mg/l.
                    5 mg/l
These levels represent reasonable goals
for drinking water quality. The States
may  establish higher  or  lower levels
which may be  appropriate dependent
upon local conditions such as unavail-
ability  of alternate  source waters  or
other compelling factors, provided that
public health and  welfare  are  not ad-
versely affected.
[44 PR 42198, July 19, 1979, as amended at 51
PR 11412, Apr. 2,  1986; 56 PR  3597, Jan.  30,
1991]

§ 143.4  Monitoring.
  (a)  It is recommended that  the pa-
rameters in these regulations should  be
monitored at intervals no less frequent
than  the monitoring performed for in-
organic chemical contaminants listed
in  the   National  Interim  Primary
Drinking Water Regulations as applica-
ble to community water systems. More
frequent monitoring would be  appro-
priate for  specific  parameters such  as
pH, color, odor or others under certain
circumstances as directed by the State.
  (b)  Measurement of pH,  copper and
fluoride to determine compliance under
§143.3 may be  conducted  with one  of
the methods in §141.23(k)(l). Analyses
of aluminum, chloride, foaming agents,
iron,  manganese,  odor,  silver,  sulfate,
total dissolved solids (TDS) and zinc  to
determine compliance under § 143.3 may
be conducted with the methods in the
following  table. Criteria for analyzing
aluminum,  copper, iron,   manganese,
silver and zinc samples with digestion
or  directly without  digestion,  and
other analytical  test  procedures are
contained in Technical Notes on Drink-
ing Water Methods,  EPA-600/R-94-173,
October  1994, which  is available   at
NTIS PB95-104766.
Contaminant
1 Aluminum 	
EPA
20072 . .
ASTM3

SM"
18th and 19th
ed
3120 B
SM4
20th ed.
3120 B
Other

                                     617

-------
Pt. 144
            40 CFR Ch.  I (7-1-04 Edition)
Contaminant


2 Chloride


3 Color
4 Foaming Agents
5 Iron


6 Manganese


7 Odor
8 Silver


9 Sulfate




1 0 Total Dissolved Solids
11 Zinc

EPA
200 82 .
200 9 2
300 O1




20072
200 9 2

20072
200 8 2
200 9 2

200 7 2
20082
20092
300 O1
375 2 '




200 7 2
20082
ASTM3


D4327-97

D512-89B












D4327-97



D5 16-90



SM4
18th and 19th
ed
3113 B
3111 D
4110 B
4500-CI- D
4500-CI- B
2120B
5540 C
3120B
3111 B
3113 B
3120 B
3111 B
3113 B
2150 B
3120 B
3111 B
3113 B
4110 B
4500-SCV- F
4500-SO42-C,
D
4500-SO42- E
2540 C
3120 B
3111 B
SM*
20th ed


4110 B
4500— Cl- D
4500-CI- B
2120 B
5540 C
3120B


3120B


21 SOB
3120 B


4110 B
4500-SO4J- F
4500-SO42-C,
D
4500-SO42- E
2540 C
3120 B

Other














I-3720-855










  The procedures shall be done in accordance with the documents listed below The incorporation by reference of the following
documents was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U S C 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 Copies
of the documents may be obtained from the sources listed below  Information regarding obtaining these documents can be ob-
tained from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 800-426-4791  Documents may be inspected at EPA's Drinking Water Docket,
EPA  West, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW,  Room B135, Washington, DC (Telephone 202-566-2426), or at the National Ar-
chives and Records Administration (NARA)  For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go to http //www archives.gov/federal register/code_of_federal  regulations/ibr  locations html
  1 "Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in~Environmental Samples", EPA/600/R-93-100, August 1993
Available at NTIS, PB94-120821
  2"Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples—Supplement I", EPA/600/R-94-111, May 1994  Avail-
able at NTIS, PB 95-125472
  3 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994,  1996, or 1999, Vols 11 01 and 11 02, ASTM International, any year containing the
cited  version of the method may be used  Copies may be obtained from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West
Conshohocken, PA 19428 sa
  "Standard  Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition (1992), 19th edition (1995), or 20th edition
(1998) American Public Health Association,  1015 Fifteenth Street, NW, Washington,  DC 20005 The cited methods published in
any of these three editions may be used, except that the versions of 3111 B, 3111 D, and 3113 B in the 20th edition may not be
used
  5 Method I-3720-85, Techniques of Water Resources Investigation of the U S Geological Survey, Book 5, Chapter A-1, 3rd
ed , 1989, Available from Information Services, U S Geological Survey, Federal Center, Box 25286, Denver, CO 80225-0425


[44  FB 42198, July 19, 1979, as amended at 53 FR 5147,  Feb. 19, 1988; 56 FR 30281, July 1,  1991;
59 FR 62470,  Dec. 5, 1994;  64 FR 67466, Dec. 1, 1999; 67 FR 65252, Oct. 23, 2002; 69  FR 18803,  Apr.
9, 2004]
      PART 144—UNDERGROUND
  INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM


       Subport A—General Provisions

Sec.
144.1  Purpose and scope of part 144.
144.2  Promulgation of Class II programs for
    Indian lands.
144.3  Definitions.
144.4  Considerations under Federal law.
144.5  Confidentiality of information.
144.6  Classification of wells.
144.7  Identification of  underground sources
    of drinking water and exempted aquifers
144.8  Noncompliance  and program reporting
    by the Director.
Subpart B—General Program Requirements

144.11   Prohibition of  unauthorized  injec-
    tion.
144.12   Prohibition of movement of fluid into
    underground sources of drinking water.
144.13   Prohibition of Class IV wells.
144.14   Requirements for wells injecting haz-
    ardous waste.
144.15   [Reserved]
144.16   Waiver of requirement by Director.
144.17   Records.


 Subpart C—Authorization of Underground
               Injection by Rule

144.21   Existing  Class  I, II (except enhanced
    recovery and  hydrocarbon  storage)  and
    III wells.
                                               618

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

144.22  Existing Class  II enhanced recovery
    and hydrocarbon storage wells.
144.23  Class IV wells.
144.24  Class V wells.
144.25  Requiring a permit.
144.26  Inventory requirements.
144.27  Requiring other information.
144.28  Requirements for Class I, II,  and III
    wells authorized by rule.

    Subpart D—Authorization by Permit

144.31  Application for a permit; authoriza-
    tion by permit.
144.32  Signatories to  permit applications
    and reports.
144.33  Area permits.
144.34  Emergency permits.
144.35  Effect of a permit.
144.36  Duration of permits.
144.37  Continuation of expiring permits.
144.38  Transfer of permits.
144.39  Modification   or   revocation   and
    reissuance of permits.
144.40  Termination of permits.
144.41  Minor modifications of permits.

       Subpart E—Permit Conditions

144.51  Conditions applicable to all permits.
144.52  Establishing permit conditions.
144.53  Schedule of compliance.
144.54  Requirements for  recording and  re-
    porting of monitoring results.
144.55  Corrective action.

Subpart F—Financial Responsibility: Class I
     Hazardous Waste Injection Wells

144.60  Applicability.
144.61  Definitions of terms as used  in this
    subpart.
144.62  Cost estimate for plugging and aban-
    donment.
144.63  Financial assurance for plugging and
    abandonment.
144.64  Incapacity of  owners  or operators,
    guarantors, or financial institutions.
144.65  Use of State-required mechanisms.
144.66  State assumption of responsibility.
144.70  Wording of the instruments.

Subpart G—Requirements for Owners and
    Operators of Class V Injection  Wells

144.79  General.

  DEFINITION OF CLASS V INJECTION WELLS
144.80  What is a Class V injection well?
144.81  Does this subpart apply to me?

 REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CLASS V INJECTION
                 WELLS
144.82  What must I do to  protect  under-
    ground sources of drinking water?
144.83  Do I need to notify anyone about my
    Class V injection well?
                                 §144.1
144.84  Do I need to get a permit?
ADDITIONAL  REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS V
  LARGE-CAPACITY  CESSPOOLS  AND  MOTOR
  VEHICLE WASTE DISPOSAL WELLS
144.85 Do  these  additional  requirements
   apply to me?
144.86 What are the definitions I  need to
   know?
144.87 How does the identification of ground
   water protection areas and other sen-
   sitive areas affect me?
144.88 What  are  the  additional  require-
   ments?
144.89 How do I close my Class V injection
   well?
  AUTHORITY:  Safe  Drinking Water Act, 42
U.S.C. 300f et seq; Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.
  SOURCE: 48 FR 14189, Apr. 1,  1983, unless
otherwise noted.

   Subpart A—General Provisions

§ 144.1  Purpose and scope of part 144.
  (a) Contents of part 144.  The  regula-
tions in  this part set  forth  require-
ments  for the Underground Injection
Control (UIC)  program  promulgated
under  Part C of the  Safe  Drinking
Water Act (SDWA) (Pub. L. 93-523,  as
amended;  42 U.S.C. 300f et seg.)  and, to
the  extent that  they  deal  with  haz-
ardous  waste, the Resource Conserva-
tion and Recovery Act (RCRA) (Pub. L.
94-580 as  amended;  42 U.S.C.  6901  et
seq.).
  (b) Applicability. (1)  The regulations
in  this part  establish  minimum  re-
quirements for UIC programs.  To the
extent set forth in part 145, each State
must meet these requirements in order
to obtain primary enforcement author-
ity for  the UIC program in that State.
  (2)  In addition   to  serving as min-
imum requirements for UIC programs,
the regulations in this  part  constitute
a part  of  the  UIC program  for States
listed in part 147 to be administered di-
rectly by EPA.
  (c) The information requirements lo-
cated  in the  following  sections have
been cleared by the Office of Manage-
ment  and  Budget:   Sections   144.11,
144.28(c)(d)(i),  144.31,  14.33,  144.51(j)(m)
(n), 144.52(a), 144.54, 144.55, 144.15, 144.23,
144.26,   144.27,   144.28(i)(k),   144.51(o),
146.52. The OMB  clearance number is
2040-0042.
                                       619

-------
§144.1
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (d)  Authority.  (1)  Section  1421  of
SDWA requires the Administrator to
promulgate  regulations   establishing
minimum  requirements  for  effective
UIC programs.
  (2) Section 1422 of SDWA requires the
Administrator  to  list  in  the  FEDERAL
REGISTER "each State  for which in his
judgment a State underground injec-
tion control program may be necessary
to assure  that  underground  injection
will   not  endanger   drinking  water
sources"  and to establish by regulation
a program for  EPA administration of
UIC programs in the absence  of an ap-
proved State program in a listed State.
  (3)  Section  1423 of  SDWA provides
procedures for EPA enforcement of UIC
requirements.
  (4)  Section 1431 authorizes the  Ad-
ministrator to  take action to protect
the health of persons when a  contami-
nant which is present  in  or may enter
a public  water  system or underground
source of drinking water may present
an imminent and substantial endanger-
ment to the health of persons.
  (5) Section 1445 of SDWA authorizes
the  promulgation  of  regulations for
such  recordkeeping,  reporting,   and
monitoring requirements "as the  Ad-
ministrator may reasonably require
* * * to assist him in establishing regu-
lations under this title," and a "right of
entry and inspection to determine com-
pliance  with this title, including for
this  purpose, inspection, at reasonable
time, or records, files, papers,  proc-
esses, controls,  and facilities * * *."
  (6) Section 1450 of SDWA authorizes
the Administrator "to prescribe  such
regulations as  are necessary or appro-
priate to carry  out his functions" under
SDWA.
  (e)  Overview  of the UIC program. An
UIC program is necessary in any State
listed by EPA under section 1422 of the
SDWA.  Because  all  States have  been
listed, the SDWA requires all  States to
submit an UIC program within 270 days
after July 24, 1980, the effective date of
40 CFR part 146, which was  the  final
element  of the UIC  minimum require-
ments to  be  originally  promulgated,
unless the Administrator  grants an ex-
tension,  which  can be for a period not
to exceed an additional 270 days. If a
State fails to  submit an approvable
program, EPA will establish a program
for that  State. Once a program is es-
tablished, SDWA provides that  all un-
derground  injections in  listed  States
are unlawful and subject  to penalties
unless authorized by a permit or a rule.
This part sets  forth  the  requirements
governing all UIC programs, authoriza-
tions by permit  or rule and prohibits
certain  types of injection. The tech-
nical regulations governing  these au-
thorizations appear in 40 CFR part 146.
  (f) Structure of the UIC program—(I)
Part 144. This part sets forth the per-
mitting  and other  program require-
ments that must be  met by UIC Pro-
grams, whether run by a State or by
EPA. It  is divided into the following
subparts:
  (i) Subpart A describes general  ele-
ments of the program, including defini-
tions and classifications.
  (ii) Subpart B sets  forth the general
program requirements, including  the
performance standards applicable to all
injection   activities,  basic  elements
that all  UIC programs must contain,
and  provisions for waiving permit of
rule requirements  under  certain  cir-
cumstances.
  (iii) Subpart  C sets forth require-
ments for wells authorized by rule.
  (iv) Subpart D sets forth permitting
procedures.
  (v) Subpart E sets forth specific con-
ditions,  or types of conditions,  that
must at a  minimum be included in all
permits.
  (vi) Subpart F sets forth the financial
responsibility requirements for  owners
and  operators of all  existing and new
Class I hazardous waste injection wells.
  (vii) Subpart G of this part sets forth
requirements for owners and operators
of Class V injection wells.
  (2) Part 145. While part  144 sets forth
minimum  requirements  for  all  UIC
Programs,  these requirements are spe-
cifically identified as  elements  of  a
State application for primacy  to ad-
minister an UIC Program in  part 145.
Part 145 also sets forth the  necessary
elements of a State submission and the
procedural requirements  for  approval
of State programs.
  (3) Part 124. The public  participation
requirements that must be met  by UIC
Programs,  whether  administered by
the State or by EPA, are set forth in
part 124. EPA  must comply  with all
                                     620

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §144.1
part 124 requirements; State adminis-
tered programs must comply with part
124 as required by part 145. These  re-
quirements carry out the purposes of
the public participation requirement of
40 CPR part 25 (Public Participation),
and supersede the requirements of that
part as they apply to the UIC Program.
  (4) Part 146. This part sets forth the
technical criteria and standards that
must be met in permits and authoriza-
tions by rule as required by part 144.
  (g) Scope of the permit or rule require-
ment. The UIC Permit Program regu-
lates underground injections  by  five
classes of wells (see definition of "well
injection," §144.3). The five  classes of
wells are set forth in §144.6. All owners
or operators  of  these injection wells
must be authorized either by permit or
rule by  the Director. In carrying out
the mandate of the SDWA, this subpart
provides that no  injection shall be au-
thorized by permit or rule if it results
in the  movement of  fluid containing
any   contaminant  into  Underground
Sources of  Drinking Water  (USDWs—
see §144.3 for definition),  if the pres-
ence of that contaminant may cause a
violation  of  any  primary  drinking
water regulation  under 40 CFR part 141
or may adversely affect the health of
persons  (§144.12). Existing  Class  IV
wells which inject hazardous waste di-
rectly into  an underground source of
drinking  water  are to be eliminated
over a  period of six months and new
such Class IV wells are to be prohibited
(§144.13). For Class V wells, if remedial
action appears necessary, a permit may
be required  (§144.25)  or the  Director
must require  remedial action or  clo-
sure by order (§144.12(c)).  During UIC
Program  development,  the  Director
may identify  aquifers and portions of
aquifers which are actual  or potential
sources  of  drinking- water.  This will
provide an aid to the Director in car-
rying out his or her  duty to protect all
USDWs. An aquifer is a USDW if it fits
the definition, even  if it has  not been
"identified." The Director may also des-
ignate  "exempted aquifers" using  the
criteria in 40  CFR 146.4. Such aquifers
are those which would otherwise qual-
ify as "underground sources of drinking
water" to be protected, but which have
no real potential to be used as drinking
water sources. Therefore, they are not
USDWs. No aquifer is an "exempted aq-
uifer" until it has been  affirmatively
designated  under  the procedures  in
§144.7. Aquifers which do not  fit the
definition  of  "underground  source  of
drinking  water"  are   not  "exempted
aquifers." They are simply not  subject
to  the  special   protection afforded
USDWs.
  (1) Specific inclusions. The following
wells are included among those types
of injection activities  which are cov-
ered by the UIC regulations. (This list
is not intended to be  exclusive but is
for clarification only.)
  (i) Any injection  well  located  on  a
drilling platform inside the State's ter-
ritorial waters.
  (ii) Any dug  hole or  well  that is
deeper than its largest surface  dimen-
sion,  where the principal function of
the hole is emplacement of fluids.
  (iii) Any well used by  generators of
hazardous waste, or by owners or  oper-
ators of hazardous waste management
facilities,  to  dispose   of fluids  con-
taining hazardous waste.  This includes
the disposal of hazardous waste into
what would  otherwise be septic sys-
tems and cesspools, regardless of  their
capacity.
  (iv) Any  septic  tank,  cesspool,  or
other well used by a multiple dwelling,
community, or Regional system for the
injection of wastes.
  (2) Specific exclusions. The following
are not covered by these regulations:
  (i) Injection wells located  on  a  drill-
ing platform or other site that is be-
yond the State's territorial waters.
  (ii) Individual or single family  resi-
dential waste  disposal  systems such as
domestic cesspools or septic systems.
  (iii) Non-residential cesspools, septic
systems or similar waste disposal sys-
tems if such systems (A) Are used sole-
ly for  the disposal  of sanitary waste,
and  (B)  have  the capacity  to serve
fewer than 20 persons a day.
  (iv) Injection wells used for injection
of hydrocarbons which are of pipeline
quality and are gases at standard tem-
perature and pressure for the purpose
of storage.
  (v) Any  dug hole, drilled hole,  or
bored shaft which is not used  for the
subsurface emplacement of fluids.
  (3)  The  prohibition applicable  to
Class IV wells under §144.13 does not
                                     621

-------
§144.2
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
apply to injections of hazardous wastes
into aquifers or portions thereof which
have   been  exempted  pursuant  to
§146.04.
  (h)  Interim  Status  under RCRA for
Class I Hazardous Waste Injection Wells.
The  minimum   national   standards
which  define  acceptable injection  of
hazardous  waste  during the period of
interim status under RCRA are set out
in  the applicable  provisions  of this
part, parts 146 and 147, and §265.430 of
this chapter. The issuance of a UIC per-
mit does not automatically terminate
RCRA  interim  status. A Class I well's
interim status  does,  however,  auto-
matically terminate upon issuance to
that well  of a RCRA  permit, or  upon
the well's receiving a RCRA permit-by-
rule under  §270.60(b)  of this chapter.
Thus, until a Class I well injecting haz-
ardous waste receives a RCRA  permit
or  RCRA  permit-by-rule,  the well's
interim status requirements are the
applicable    requirements    imposed
pursuant to this part and parts 146, 147,
and 265 of this chapter, including any
requirements imposed in the  UIC per-
mit.
[48 PR  14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
PR  20181, May 11, 1984; 52 PR 20676, June 2,
1987; 52 PR 45797, Dec. 1, 1987; 53 PR  28147,
July 26, 1988; 64 PR 68565, Dec 7, 1999;  67 FR
39592, June 7, 2002]

§ 144.2   Promulgation  of Class II pro-
    grams for Indian lands.
  Notwithstanding the requirements of
this part  or parts  124 and  146 of this
chapter, the Administrator  may pro-
mulgate an alternate UIC Program for
Class II wells on any Indian reservation
or Indian lands. In promulgating such a
program the Administrator shall con-
sider the following factors:
  (a) The interest  and preferences of
the tribal government having responsi-
bility  for  the given reservation or In-
dian lands;
  (b) The  consistency between the al-
ternate program and  any program in
effect in an adjoining  jurisdiction; and
  (c) Such  other  factors as  are  nec-
essary and appropriate to carry out the
Safe Drinking Water Act.

§ 144.3   Definitions.
  Terms not  defined  in this section
have the meaning given by the appro-
priate  Act.  When a defined term ap-
pears in a definition, the defined term
is sometimes  placed within quotation
marks as an aid to readers.
  Administrator  means   the Adminis-
trator  of the  United States  Environ-
mental Protection Agency, or an au-
thorized representative.
  Application means the  EPA standard
national forms for applying for a per-
mit, including any additions, revisions
or modifications to the forms; or forms
approved by EPA for use  in approved
States, including  any approved modi-
fications or revisions.
  Appropriate Act and regulations means
the  Solid  Waste  Disposal  Act,  as
amended by the Resource Conservation
and  Recovery Act (RCRA);  or  Safe
Drinking Water  Act (SDWA), which-
ever  is  applicable;   and  applicable
regulations  promulgated under  those
statutes.
  Approved State Program means a UIC
program administered by the State or
Indian Tribe that has been approved by
EPA according to SDWA sections 1422
and/or  1425.
  Aquifer means a geological "forma-
tion," group of formations, or part of a
formation that is capable of yielding a
significant amount of water to a well
or spring.
  Area of review  means  the area sur-
rounding an  injection  well described
according to the criteria  set forth in
§ 146.06 or in the case of an  area permit.
the project area plus a circumscribing
area the width of  which is either  Vi of
a mile-or a number calculated accord-
ing to  the criteria set forth in §146.06.
  Cesspool means a "drywell" that re-
ceives  untreated sanitary  waste  con-
taining  human  excreta,  and  which
sometimes has an open  bottom and/or
perforated sides.
  Contaminant  means  any physical,
chemical, biological,  or  radiological
substance or matter in water.
  Director means the Regional Adminis-
trator, the State director or the Tribal
director as the context requires,  or an
authorized representative.  When there
is no  approved State  or  Tribal  pro-
gram,  and there is an  EPA  adminis-
tered program,  "Director"  means  the
Regional Administrator. When there is
an approved State or  Tribal program,
"Director" normally means the State or
                                     622

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §144.3
Tribal director. In some circumstances,
however, EPA retains the authority to
take certain actions even when there is
an  approved State or Tribal program.
In  such  cases,  the  term  "Director"
means the Regional Administrator and
not the State or Tribal director.
  Draft permit means a document  pre-
pared under §124.6 indicating the Direc-
tor's  tentative  decision to  issue or
deny, modify, revoke  and reissue,  ter-
minate, or reissue a "permit." A notice
of intent to terminate a permit, and a
notice of intent  to deny a permit, as
discussed in §124.5 are types of "draft
permits."  A denial of a  request for
modification,      revocation      and
reissuance,  or  termination,  as  dis-
cussed in §124.5 is not a "draft permit."
  Drilling  mud means  a heavy suspen-
sion used in drilling an "injection well,"
introduced  down  the drill  pipe  and
through the drill bit.
  Drywell means a well,  other than an
improved  sinkhole or subsurface fluid
distribution system,  completed above
the water table so that its bottom and
sides are typically dry except when re-
ceiving fluids.
  Eligible Indian Tribe is a  Tribe that
meets  the  statutory requirements es-
tablished at 42 U.S.C. 300j-ll(b)(l).
  Emergency permit means a  UIC "per-
mit" issued in accordance with  §144.34.
  Environmental    Protection    Agency
("EPA") means the United States Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency.
  EPA  means the United States "Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency."
  Exempted aquifer means an "aquifer"
or its portion that meets the  criteria in
the definition of "underground source
of drinking water" but which has been
exempted according to the  procedures
in §144.7.
  Existing injection  well means an "in-
jection well" other than a "new injec-
tion well."
  Facility  or activity means  any  UIC
"injection well," or an other facility or
activity that is subject to regulation
under the UIC program.
  Fluid means  any material or  sub-
stance which flows or moves whether
in a semisolid, liquid, sludge, gas, or
any other form or state.
  Formation means a body of consoli-
dated  or unconsolidated rock charac-
terized by a degree of lithologic homo-
geneity which is prevailingly, but not
necessarily, tabular and is mappable on
the earth's  surface or traceable in the
subsurface.
  Formation fluid means "fluid" present
in a "formation" under natural condi-
tions as opposed to introduced fluids,
such as "drilling mud."
  Generator  means  any person, by site
location, whose act or process produces
hazardous waste identified or listed in
40 CFR part 261.
  Ground water means water below the
land surface in a zone of saturation.
  Hazardous waste  means a  hazardous
waste as defined in  40 CFR 261.3.
  Hazardous waste  management facility
("HWM facility") means all  contiguous
land,   and  structures,  other  appur-
tenances,  and improvements  on  the
land used for  treating, storing, or dis-
posing of hazardous  waste.  A facility
may consist of several treatment,  stor-
age, or disposal operational units (for
example, one or more landfills, surface
impoundments,   or  combination  of
them).
  HWM  facility   means  "Hazardous
Waste Management facility"
  Improved sinkhole means a naturally
occurring karst  depression or  other
natural crevice found in  volcanic ter-
rain and other geologic settings which
have been modified by man for the pur-
pose of directing and emplacing fluids
into the subsurface.
  Indian lands  means "Indian country"
as defined in  18 U.S.C. 1151. That sec-
tion defines Indian country as:
  (a) All land  within  the limits of any
Indian reservation  under the jurisdic-
tion of the  United  States government,
notwithstanding the  issuance of any
patent, and,  including  rights-of-way
running through the reservation;
  (b)  All  dependent  Indian commu-
nities within the borders of the United
States whether within the original or
subsequently acquired territory there-
of, and whether within or without the
limits of a State; and
  (c) All Indian allotments, the Indian
titles to which have  not been extin-
guished, including  rights-of-way  run-
ning through the same.
  Indian Tribe means  any Indian Tribe
having  a  Federally  recognized  gov-
erning body carrying out substantial
                                    623

-------
§144.3
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
governmental duties and powers over a
defined area.
  Injection  well means  a "well"  into
which "fluids" are being injected.
  Injection  zone  means  a geological
"formation"  group of  formations,  or
part of  a  formation  receiving' fluids
through a "well."
  Interstate Agency means an agency of
two  or more  States established by or
under  an agreement  or  compact ap-
proved by  the Congress,  or any other
agency of two or more States or Indian
Tribes having substantial powers or du-
ties pertaining to the  control of pollu-
tion as determined and approved by the
Administrator under the  "appropriate
Act and regulations."
  Major facility means any UIC "facility
or activity"  classified as  such by the
Regional Administrator, or, in the case
of approved  State programs, the Re-
gional Administrator  in  conjunction
with the State Director.
  Manifest  means the  shipping  docu-
ment  originated  and  signed  by  the
"generator"  which contains the infor-
mation required by subpart B of 40 CFR
part 262.
  New  injection wells means an "injec-
tion well" which began injection after a
UIC  program for the  State applicable
to the well is approved or prescribed.
  Owner or operator means the owner or
operator of any  "facility or  activity"
subject to regulation  under  the UIC
program.
  Permit  means an  authorization,  li-
cense,  or equivalent control document
issued by EPA or an approved State to
implement  the requirements  of this
part, parts 145, 146 and 124. "Permit" in-
cludes an area permit (§144.33) and an
emergency  permit  (§144.34).  Permit
does not include  UIC authorization by
rule (§144.21), or any permit which has
not yet been the subject of final agency
action, such as a "draft permit."
  Person  means an individual, associa-
tion, partnership, corporation, munici-
pality, State, Federal, or Tribal agen-
cy, or an agency or employee thereof.
  Plugging means the act or process of
stopping the flow of water, oil or gas
into or out of a formation through a
borehole or well  penetrating  that for-
mation.
  Point of injection means the  last ac-
cessible sampling point prior to waste
fluids  being  released  into  the  sub-
surface environment through a Class V
injection well. For example, the point
of injection of a Class V septic system
might be the distribution box—the last
accessible  sampling point  before  the
waste fluids drain into the underlying
soils. For a dry well, it is likely to be
the well bore itself.
  Project means a group  of wells in a
single operation.
  Radioactive  Waste  means any  waste
which contains radioactive material in
concentrations which exceed those list-
ed in 10 CFR part 20, appendix B, table
II, column 2.
  RCRA means  the  Solid Waste Dis-
posal Act as amended by the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976
(Pub. L. 94-580, as amended by Pub. L.
95-609,  Pub. L. 96-510,  42 U.S.C. 6901 et
seq.).
  Regional Administrator means the Re-
gional  Administrator  of the  appro-
priate  Regional Office of the Environ-
mental Protection Agency or  the au-
thorized representative of the Regional
Administrator.
  Sanitary waste means liquid or solid
wastes originating solely from humans
and human activities, such  as  wastes
collected  from toilets, showers, wash
basins, sinks used for cleaning domes-
tic areas, sinks used for  food prepara-
tion, clothes  washing operations,  and
sinks or washing machines where food
and beverage serving dishes,  glasses,
and utensils  are  cleaned.  Sources of
these  wastes may  include  single  or
multiple residences,  hotels and motels.
restaurants, bunkhouses, schools, rang-
er stations, crew  quarters, guard sta-
tions,  campgrounds,  picnic  grounds,
day-use recreation  areas, other com-
mercial facilities, and industrial  facili-
ties provided the waste  is not  mixed
with industrial waste.
  Schedule of compliance means a sched-
ule of remedial measures included in a
"permit," including  an enforceable se-
quence of interim requirements < for ex-
ample,  actions,  operations, or  mile-
stone  events)  leading to compliance
with the "appropriate Act and regula-
tions."
  SDWA  means  the   Safe  Drinking
Water  Act (Pub. L. 93-523, as amended;
42 U.S.C. 300f etseq.).
                                     624

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §144.4
  Septic system means a "well" that is
used to emplace sanitary waste below
the surface and is typically comprised
of a septic tank and subsurface fluid
distribution system or disposal system.
  Site  means  the land or  water area
where  any "facility or activity" is phys-
ically  located or conducted,  including
adjacent land used in connection with
the facility or activity.
  State means any of the 50 States, the
District of Columbia, Guam,  the Com-
monwealth of Puerto Rico, the  Virgin
Islands,  American Samoa, the Trust
Territory  of  the  Pacific  Islands,  the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mar-
iana Islands, or an Indian Tribe treated
as a State.
  State Director means the chief admin-
istrative  officer of any  State, inter-
state,  or  Tribal agency  operating an
"approved  program,"  or the  delegated
representative of the State director. If
the responsibility is divided among two
or more States, interstate,  or  Tribal
agencies,  "State Director" means  the
chief  administrative  officer  of  the
State,  interstate, or Tribal agency au-
thorized to perform the particular pro-
cedure or  function to which  reference
is made.
  State/EPA agreement means  an agree-
ment  between the Regional  Adminis-
trator  and the State which coordinates
EPA and  State activities, responsibil-
ities and programs.
  Stratum (plural strata) means a single
sedimentary bed or layer, regardless of
thickness, that consists of  generally
the same kind of rock material.
  Subsurface  fluid  distribution  system
means  an  assemblage  of perforated
pipes,  drain  tiles,  or  other  similar
mechanisms  intended  to  distribute
fluids  below the surface of the ground.
  Total dissolved solids means  the total
dissolved  (filterable) solids  as  deter-
mined  by use of the method specified in
40 CFR part 136.
  Transferee means the owner or oper-
ator receiving ownership and/or oper-
ational control of the well.
  Transferor means the owner or oper-
ator   transferring  ownership   and/or
operational control of the well.
  UIC  means  the Underground  Injec-
tion Control program under Part C of
the Safe Drinking Water Act,  including
an "approved State program."
  Underground injection means  a "well
injection."
  Underground source of drinking  water
(USDW)  means an aquifer or its por-
tion:
  (a)(l)  Which  supplies  any   public
water system; or
  (2) Which contains a sufficient quan-
tity of ground water to supply a public
water system; and
  (i) Currently supplies drinking water
for human consumption; or
  (ii)  Contains fewer than 10,000 mg/1
total  dissolved solids; and
  (b) Which is not an exempted aquifer.
  USDW means "underground source of
drinking water."
  Well means: A bored, drilled, or driv-
en  shaft whose depth is  greater than
the largest surface dimension; or, a dug
hole whose depth is greater than the
largest surface dimension; or,  an im-
proved sinkhole; or, a subsurface fluid
distribution system.
  Well injection means  the subsurface
emplacement of fluids through a well.

[48 FR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
FR 45305, Nov. 15, 1984; 52  FR 20676, June 2,
1987; 53 FR 37412, Sept. 26, 1988; 58 FR 63895,
Deo. 3, 1993; 59 FR 64345, Dec.  14, 1994; 64 FR
68565, Dec. 7, 1999]

§ 144.4  Considerations  under Federal
    law.
  The following is a list of  Federal laws
that may apply to the issuance of per-
mits  under these rules. When  any of
these laws is applicable, its procedures
must  be followed. When the applicable
law requires consideration or adoption
of particular  permit conditions or re-
quires the denial of  a permit, those re-
quirements also must be followed.
  (a) The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16
U.S.C. 1273 et seq. Section  7 of the Act
prohibits  the Regional Administrator
from  assisting by license or otherwise
the  construction of  any water re-
sources project that would have  a di-
rect,  adverse  effect  on the values for
which a national wild and scenic river
was established.
  (b) The National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966, 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq. Section
106 of the Act and implementing regu-
lations (36 CFR  part 800)  require the
Regional Administrator, before  issuing
                                     625

-------
§144.5
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
a license, to adopt measures when fea-
sible to mitigate  potential adverse ef-
fects of the licensed activity and prop-
erties  listed or eligible for listing in
the  National   Register   of   Historic
Places. The Act's requirements  are to
be  implemented  in cooperation with
State  Historic  Preservation  Officers
and upon notice  to,  and when  appro-
priate, in consultation with the Advi-
sory Council on Historic Preservation.
  (c)  The  Endangered  Species Act, 16
U.S.C. 1531 et sect.  Section  7 of the Act
and implementing regulations (50 CFR
part 402) require the Regional Adminis-
trator to ensure,  in consultation with
the Secretary of the Interior  or Com-
merce, that  any action authorized by
EPA is not likely to jeopardize the con-
tinued existence of any endangered or
threatened species or adversely  affect
its critical habitat.
  (d) The Coastal Zone Management Act,
16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq. Section  307(c) of
the Act and implementing regulations
(15  CFR part 930) prohibit EPA from
issuing a permit for an activity  affect-
ing land or  water use in the coastal
zone until the  applicant certifies that
the proposed activity complies with
the State  Coastal Zone  Management
program,  and  the State  or  its  des-
ignated agency concurs with  the  cer-
tification  (or the Secretary  of Com-
merce overrides the States nonconcur-
rence).
  (e) The Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.,  requires the
Regional Administrator, before issuing
a permit proposing or  authorizing the
impoundment  (with  certain exemp-
tions), diversion,  or  other control or
modification of any body of water, con-
sult with the appropriate State agency
exercising  jurisdiction over wildlife re-
sources to conserve these resources.
  (f) Executive orders. [Reserved]
(Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), Safe
Drinking  Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.),
Clean  Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et  seq.),  Re-
source  Conservation and  Recovery Act (42
U.S.C. 6901 et seq.))
[48 FR  14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 48
FR 39621, Sept. 1, 1983]

§ 144.5  Confidentiality of information.
  (a) In accordance with 40 CFR  part 2,
any information   submitted  to EPA
pursuant to  these regulations may be
claimed  as confidential  by  the sub-
mitter. Any such  claim must be  as-
serted at the time of submission in the
manner prescribed on the  application
form  or instructions or, in the case of
other  submissions,  by  stamping the
words "confidential business informa-
tion"  on each page containing such in-
formation. If no claim is made at the
time of submission, EPA may make the
information  available  to  the  public
without further notice. If a claim is as-
serted, the information will be treated
in accordance with the procedures in 40
CFR part 2 (Public Information).
  (b)  Claims of confidentiality for the
following information will be denied:
  (1) The name and address of any per-
mit applicant or permittee;
  (2) Information which deals with the
existence, absence, or level of contami-
nants in drinking water.

§ 144.6 Classification of wells.
  Injection  wells are classified as fol-
lows:
  (a)  Class I. (1) Wells used by genera-
tors of hazardous waste  or owners  or
operators of hazardous waste  manage-
ment  facilities  to  inject  hazardous
waste beneath  the lowermost forma-
tion  containing,  within   one-quarter
mile  of the well bore, an underground
source of drinking water.
  (2)  Other industrial  and municipal
disposal  wells  which inject fluids  be-
neath the lowermost formation con-
taining, within one quarter mile of the
well  bore,  an  underground source  of
drinking water.
  (3)  Radioactive  waste disposal  wells
which inject fluids  below the  lower-
most  formation containing an under-
ground source of drinking water within
one quarter mile of the well bore.
  (b) Class 11. Wells which inject fluids:
  (1) Which are brought to the surface
in connection with natural gas storage
operations,  or conventional oil or nat-
ural gas production and may be com-
mingled  with  waste waters  from gas
plants which are  an intergral part  of
production operations, unless those wa-
ters are classified as a hazardous waste
at the time of injection.
  (2)  For  enhanced recovery of oil  or
natural gas; and
                                     626

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §144.7
  (3)  For  storage  of  hydrocarbons
which are liquid at standard tempera-
ture and pressure.
  (c)  Class III. Wells which inject for
extraction of minerals including:
  (1)  Mining- of sulfur  by  the  Frasch
process;
  (2) In situ production of  uranium or
other metals;  this category includes
only in-situ production  from ore bodies
which have  not been  conventionally
mined.  Solution  mining  of  conven-
tional mines such as stopes leaching is
included in Class V.
  (3)  Solution mining of salts  or pot-
ash.
  (d) Class IV. (1) Wells  used by  genera-
tors of hazardous  waste or  of radio-
active waste, by owners or operators of
hazardous waste  management facili-
ties, or by owners or operators of radio-
active waste disposal sites to dispose of
hazardous waste or radioactive waste
into  a  formation  which within  one-
quarter (Vi) mile of the well contains
an  underground  source of  drinking
water.
  (2) Wells used by generators  of haz-
ardous waste  or of radioactive waste,
by  owners  or  operators  of hazardous
waste  management  facilities,  or by
owners   or  operators  of  radioactive
waste disposal sites to  dispose  of haz-
ardous  waste  or  radioactive waste
above a  formation which within  one-
quarter (V4) mile of the well contains
an  underground  source of  drinking
water.
  (3) Wells used by generators  of haz-
ardous waste or owners or operators of
hazardous waste management facilities
to dispose of hazardous  waste, which
cannot be classified under  paragraph
(a)(l) or  (d) (1) and (2)  of this  section
(e.g., wells used to dispose of hazardous
waste into or above a formation which
contains an aquifer which has been ex-
empted pursuant to §146.04).
  (e)  Class V.  Injection wells  not in-
cluded in Class I, II, III, or IV. Specific
types of Class V injection wells are de-
scribed in §144.81.

[48 PR 14189,  Apr. 1, 1983,  as amended at 52
PR 20676,  June 2, 1987; 64  PR 68565, Dec. 7,
1999]
§144.7  Identification  of underground
    sources  of drinking  water and ex-
    empted aquifers.
  (a)  The Director may identify (by
narrative   description,   illustrations,
maps,  or other  means)  and shall pro-
tect,  except  where  exempted  under
paragraph (b) of this section, as an un-
derground source of drinking water, all
aquifers or  parts  of aquifers  which
meet the definition of an "underground
source  of drinking water" in §144.3.
Even if an aquifer has not been specifi-
cally identified by the Director, it is an
underground source of drinking  water
if it meets the definition in  § 144.3.
  (b)(l) The Director may identify (by
narrative   description,   illustrations,
maps,  or other means) and describe in
geographic  and/or  geometric  terms
(such as vertical and lateral limits and
gradient) which are clear and definite,
all  aquifers  or parts thereof which the
Director proposes to designate as ex-
empted aquifers using the criteria in 40
CFR 146.04.
  (2) No designation of an exempted aq-
uifer submitted as part  of  a UIC Pro-
gram shall  be final until approved by
the Administrator as part of a UIC pro-
gram.
  (3) Subsequent to program approval
or  promulgation,   the  Director  may,
after notice and opportunity for a pub-
lic hearing,  identify additional exempt-
ed  aquifers. For approved  State pro-
grams exemption of aquifers identifed
(i) under § 146.04(b) shall be treated as a
program  revision  under  §145.32;  (ii)
under  §146.04(c) shall  become final if
the State Director  submits  the exemp-
tion in writing to the  Administrator
and the  Administrator has not  dis-
approved the  designation   within  45
days. Any disapproval by the Adminis-
trator shall  state the reasons and shall
constitute final Agency action for pur-
poses of judicial review.
  (c)(l) For Class III wells, the Director
shall require an applicant for a permit
which  necessitates an aquifer exemp-
tion under  §146.04(b)(l) to  furnish the
data necessary to demonstrate that the
aquifer is expected to be  mineral or hy-
drocarbon producing.  Information con-
tained in the mining plan for the pro-
posed project, such as a map and gen-
eral description  of the mining  zone,
general information on the  mineralogy
                                     627

-------
§144.8
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
and geochemistry of the mining zone,
analysis of the amenability of the min-
ing zone to the proposed mining meth-
od, and a time-table of planned devel-
opment  of the mining  zone shall  be
considered by the Director in addition
to   the  information  required   by
§144.31(g).
  (2) For Class II wells, a demonstra-
tion of commercial  producibility  shall
be made as follows:
  (i) For a Class II well  to be used for
enhanced oil  recovery processes  in a
field  or  project  containing aquifers
from  which  hydrocarbons  were  pre-
viously     produced,     commercial
producibility shall be presumed by the
Director upon  a demonstration by the
applicant of historical production hav-
ing occurred  in the  project area  or
field.
  (ii) For Class II wells not located in a
field  or  project  containing aquifers
from  which  hydrocarbons  were  pre-
viously produced, information such as
logs, core data, formation description,
formation  depth,  formation thickness
and formation  parameters such as per-
meability and porosity shall be  consid-
ered by the Director, to  the  extent
such information is available.

§ 144.8  Noncompliance  and  program
    reporting by the Director.
  The Director shall prepare quarterly
and annual reports  as detailed below.
When the State  is  the permit-issuing
authority, the State Director shall sub-
mit  any  reports  required under this
section to the Regional Administrator.
When  EPA is  the  permit-issuing au-
thority,  the  Regional  Administrator
shall submit any report required under
this section to EPA Headquarters.
  (a)  Quarterly  reports.  The Director
shall  submit  quarterly  narrative re-
ports for major facilities as follows:
  (1) Format. The report shall use the
following format:
  (i) Provide  an  alphabetized  list  of
permittees. When two or more permit-
tees have the  same  name, the lowest
permit number shall be entered first.
  (ii)  For each entry on  the list, in-
clude the following  information in the
following order:
  (A) Name, location, and  permit num-
ber of the noncomplying- permittees.
  (B)  A brief description  and date of
each  instance of  noncompliance for
that  permittee.   Instances  of  non-
compliance  may  include one or more
the kinds set forth in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section. When a permittee has
noncompliance of more than one kind,
combine  the information into a single
entry for each such permittee.
  (C)  The date(s) and a brief descrip-
tion of the  action(s)  taken by the Di-
rector to ensure compliance.
  (D)  Status of the instance(s) of non-
compliance  with the date of the review
of the status or the date of resolution.
  (E) Any details  which tend to explain.
or  mitigate the  instance(s) of  non-
compliance.
  (2) Instances of noncompliance to be re-
ported. Any  instances of noncompliance
within the following categories shall be
reported  in successive reports until the
noncompliance is reported as resolved.
Once  noncompliance  is reported as re-
solved it need not appear in subsequent
reports.
  (i) Failure to complete construction ele-
ments. When the permittee has failed to
complete, by the date specified in the
permit,  an  element  of a  compliance
schedule involving  either  planning for
construction or a construction step (for
example, begin construction, attain op-
eration  level); and the  permittee has
not returned to compliance by  accom-
plishing  the required elements  of the
schedule  within 30 days from the date a
compliance   schedule  report  is   due
under the permit.
  (ii)  Modifications  to schedules  of com-
pliance. When a schedule of compliance
in the permit has been modified under
§§144.39 or 144.41 because of the permit-
tee's noncompliance.
  (iii) Failure to complete or provide com-
pliance schedule  or monitoring  reports.
When the permittee has failed to  com-
plete  or provide a report required in a
permit compliance  schedule (for exam-
ple, progress report or notice of  non-
compliance  or compliance) or a moni-
toring report;  and the  permittee has
not  submitted  the  complete  report
within 30 days from the date it is due
under the permit  for compliance sched-
ules, or from the date specified in the
permit for monitoring reports.
                                     628

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §144.11
  (iv) Deficient  reports.  When the re-
quired  reports  provided by  the per-
mittee are so deficient as to cause mis-
understanding by the Director and thus
impede  the review of the status of com-
pliance.
  (v) Noncompliance with other permit re-
quirements. Noncompliance shall be re-
ported in the following circumstances:
  (A) Whenever  the  permittee has vio-
lated a  permit requirement (other than
reported under  paragraph (a)(2) (i) or
(ii) of  this section), and has not re-
turned  to  compliance  within 45 days
from the date reporting of noncompli-
ance was due under the permit; or
  (B) When the Director  determines
that a pattern of noncompliance exists
for a major facility  permittee over the
most recent four consecutive  reporting
periods. This pattern includes any vio-
lation of the same requirement in two
consecutive reporting periods, and any
violation of one or more requirements
in each of four consecutive  reporting
periods; or
  (C)  When the Director  determines
significant  permit  noncompliance  or
other significant  event has  occurred,
such  as a migration of fluids  into  a
USDW.
  (vi) All other. Statistical information
shall be reported quarterly on all other
instances of noncompliance by  major
facilities with permit requirements not
otherwise reported under paragraph (a)
of this section.
  (b)  Annual reports—(1) Annual non-
compliance report. Statistical reports
shall be submitted by the Director on
nonmajor  UIC  permittees indicating
the total number reviewed, the number
of noncomplying nonmajor permittees,
the  number of  enforcement actions,
and  number of  permit modifications
extending  compliance  deadlines. The
statistical  information shall  be orga-
nized to follow the types of noncompli-
ance  listed in  paragraph (a) of this
section.
  (2)  For  State-administered   UIC Pro-
grams only.  In addition  to  the  annual
noncompliance report, the State Direc-
tor shall:
  (i) Submit each year a program re-
port to the Administrator (in a manner
and  form prescribed by the  Adminis-
trator) consisting of:
  (A) A detailed  description  of  the
State's implementation of its program;
  (B) Suggested changes, if any to the
program  description  (see  §145.23(f))
which are necessary to reflect more ac-
curately the State's progress in issuing
permits;
  (C) An updated inventory  of active
underground  injection  operations in
the State.
  (ii) In addition to complying with the
requirements  of paragraph (b)(2)(i) of
this section, the Director shall provide
the  Administrator,  on  February  28th
and August 31st of each of the first two
years of program operation, the infor-
mation required in 40 CFR 146.15, 146.25,
and 146.35.
  (c) Schedule. (1) For all quarterly re-
ports. On the last working day of May,
August, November,  and  February, the
State Director shall submit to the Re-
gional Administrator information  con-
cerning noncompliance with permit re-
quirements by major facilities in the
State in accordance with the following
schedule. The Regional  Administrator
shall prepare  and submit information
for EPA-issued  permits  to  EPA Head-
quarters in accordance with the same
schedule.

    QUARTERS COVERED BY REPORTS ON
    NONCOMPLIANCE BY MAJOR FACILITIES
         [Date for completion of reports]
January, February, and March 	    ...     ' May 31
April, May, and June    	   ..    1 Aug 31
July, August, and September   	       1 Nov. 30
October, November, and December 	    1 Feb. 28
 1 Reports must be made available to the public for inspec-
tion and copying on this date
  (2) For all annual reports.  The period
for annual  reports shall  be  for the cal-
endar year  ending December 31,  with
reports  completed and available to the
public no more than 60 days later.

   Subpart B—General Program
           Requirements

§ 144.11  Prohibition  of  unauthorized
    injection.
  Any underground injection,  except
into a well  authorized by rule or except
as authorized by permit issued under
the  UIC program,  is  prohibited.  The
construction of any well required to
                                     629

-------
§144.12
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
have a  permit is  prohibited until the
permit has been issued.
[48 FR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 58
FR 63895, Dec. 3, 1993]

§ 144.12  Prohibition  of  movement  of
   fluid into underground sources of
   drinking water.
  (a) No owner or operator shall con-
struct,  operate,  maintain,  convert,
plug-, abandon, or conduct any other in-
jection  activity in a manner that al-
lows the movement of fluid containing
any  contaminant  into  underground
sources of drinking water, if the  pres-
ence of that contaminant may cause a
violation   of  any  primary  drinking
water regulation under 40 CFR part 142
or may otherwise adversely affect the
health of persons. The applicant  for a
permit shall  have the burden of show-
ing1 that the requirements of this para-
graph are met.
  (b) For Class I, II and III wells, if any
water quality monitoring of an under-
ground  source of drinking water  indi-
cates  the movement of any contami-
nant into  the underground source of
drinking water, except  as  authorized
under part 146, the Director shall pre-
scribe such additional requirements for
construction,  corrective action,  oper-
ation, monitoring, or reporting (includ-
ing closure of the injection well) as are
necessary to prevent such movement.
In the  case of wells authorized by per-
mit,   these  additional  requirements
shall be imposed by modifying the per-
mit in accordance with  §144.39,  or the
permit  may   be  terminated   under
§144.40 if cause exists,  or appropriate
enforcement action may be taken if the
permit has been violated. In the  case of
wells  authorized by rule,  see  §§144.21
through 144.24. For EPA administered
programs,  such   enforcement  action
shall be taken in  accordance  with ap-
propriate sections of the  SDWA.
  (c) For Class V wells, if at any time
the Director learns that  a Class V well
may  cause  a violation  of  primary
drinking  water regulations under  40
CFR part 142, he or she shall:
  (1) Require the injector to obtain an
individual permit;
  (2) Order the injector to take such ac-
tions  (including, where  required, clo-
sure  of the injection well)  as may be
necessary to prevent the violation. For
EPA administered programs, such or-
ders shall be issued in accordance with
the  appropriate  provisions  of  the
SDWA; or
  (3) Take enforcement action.
  (d) Whenever the Director learns that
a Class V  well  may  be otherwise ad-
versely affecting the health of persons,
he or she may prescribe such actions as
may be necessary to  prevent  the ad-
verse effect, including any action au-
thorized  under  paragraph (c)  of this
section.
  (e) Notwithstanding  any other provi-
sion of this section, the Director may
take emergency action upon receipt of
information that a contaminant which
is present in or likely  to enter a public
water system or underground source of
drinking water may present an immi-
nent and substantial  endangerment to
the health  of persons. If the Director is
an  EPA  official, he must first deter-
mine that  the appropriate  State and
local authorities have not taken appro-
priate action to protect the health of
such persons, before taking emergency
action.
[48 FR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 52
FR 20676, June 2, 1987]

§ 144.13  Prohibition of Class  IV wells.
  (a) The following are prohibited, ex-
cept as provided in  paragraph (c) of
this section:
  (1) The construction of any Class IV
well.
  (2) The operation or maintenance of
any Class  IV well  not  in  operation
prior to July 18, 1980.
  (3) The operation or maintenance of
any Class IV well that was in operation
prior to July 18, 1980, after six months
following  the effective date of a UIC
program approved or  promulgated for
the state.
  (4) Any  increase in  the amount of
hazardous waste or change in the type
of  hazardous waste   injected  into  a
Class IV well.
  (b) The owner or operator  of a Class
IV well shall comply with the require-
ments of §144.14, and with the require-
ments  of  §144.23 regarding  closure of
Class IV wells.
  (c) Wells  used to inject contaminated
ground water that has  been treated and
is being reinjected into the  same for-
mation  from  which it was drawn are
                                     630

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §144.16
not prohibited by this section if such
injection is approved by  EPA,  or a
State, pursuant to provisions for clean-
up of releases under the Comprehensive
Environmental  Response,   Compensa-
tion,   and   Liability  Act   of   1980
(CERCLA),  42 U.S.C. 9601-9657, or pur-
suant to requirements and provisions
under the Resource  Conservation and
Recovery Act  (RCRA),  42  U.S.C.  6901
through 6987.
  (d)  Clarification. The following wells
are not prohibited by this action:
  (1)  Wells  used  to inject hazardous
waste into aquifers or portions thereof
that  have been exempted pursuant  to
§146.4,  if the  exempted aquifer into
which waste is injected underlies the
lowermost  formation  containing  a
USDW. Such wells are Class I wells  as
specified in §144.6(a)(l), and the owner
or operator must comply with the  re-
quirements  applicable to Class I wells.
  (2)  Wells  used  to inject hazardous
waste where  no USDW exists within
one quarter mile of the well  bore  in
any  underground formation,  provided
that the Director determines that such
injection is into  a  formation suffi-
ciently isolated to ensure that injected
fluids do not migrate from the injec-
tion zone. Such wells are Class I wells
as  specified  in  §144.6(a)(l),  and  the
owner or operator must comply with
the requirements applicable to Class I
wells.
[49 PR 20181,  May 11, 1984, as amended at 67
FR 39593, June 7, 2002]

§ 144.14  Requirements for wells inject-
    ing hazardous waste.
  (a)  Applicability.  The regulations  in
this section apply to all generators  of
hazardous waste, and to the owners  or
operators of all hazardous waste man-
agement facilities, using any class  of
well to inject hazardous wastes accom-
panied by a  manifest. (See also §144.13.)
  (b)  Authorization. The owner or oper-
ator of any well that is used to inject
hazardous waste  required to be accom-
panied by a manifest or delivery docu-
ment shall  apply for  authorization  to
inject as specified in §144.31 within 6
months after the approval  or promul-
gation of the State UIC program.
  (c) Requirements. In addition to com-
plying  with  the applicable  require-
ments of this part and 40 CFR part 146,
the owner or operator  of each facility
meeting- the requirements of paragraph
(b) of this section,  shall comply with
the following:
  (1) Notification. The owner or operator
shall comply  with the  notification re-
quirements of section 3010 of Public
Law 94-580.
  (2)  Identification number.  The  owner
or operator shall  comply with the re-
quirements of 40 CPR 264.11.
  (3) Manifest system. The owner  or op-
erator shall comply with the applicable
recordkeeping and  reporting  require-
ments for manifested wastes in 40 CFR
264.71.
  (4) Manifest discrepancies.  The  owner
or operator shall  comply with 40 CFR
264.72.
  (5) Operating record. The owner or op-
erator  shall  comply  with  40  CFR
264.73(a), (b)(l), and (b)(2).
  (6) Annual report. The owner or oper-
ator shall comply with 40 CFR 264.75.
  (7)  Unmanifested  waste  report.  The
owner or operator shall comply with 40
CFR 264.75.
  (8) Personnel training. The owner or
operator shall comply with the applica-
ble personnel training requirements of
40 CFR 264.16.
  (9) Certification of closure. When aban-
donment is completed, the owner or op-
erator must submit to the Director cer-
tification by the owner or operator and
certification  by  an  independent  reg-
istered professional  engineer that the
facility has been closed in  accordance
with the specifications in §144.52(a)(6).
  (d) Additional requirements for Class IV
wells. [Reserved]

§ 144.15  [Reserved]

§ 144.16  Waiver of requirement by Di-
    rector.
  (a) When injection  does not occur into,
through or above an  underground  source
of drinking water, the Director may au-
thorize a  well  or  project  with  less
stringent requirements for  area  of re-
view, construction,  mechanical  integ-
rity,  operation,  monitoring,  and  re-
porting than  required in 40 CFR part
146 or § 144.52 to the  extent that the re-
duction in requirements will not  result
in an  increased risk of movement of
fluids  into an underground source of
drinking water.
                                     631
      203-160 D-21

-------
§144.17
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (b) When injection occurs through or
above an underground source of drink-
ing water,  but the radius  of endan-
gering influence when computed  under
§146.06(a) is smaller or equal to the ra-
dius of the well, the Director may au-
thorize a  well or project  with less
stringent  requirements for  operation,
monitoring,  and  reporting than  re-
quired in 40 CFR part 146 or §144.52 to
the extent  that  the  reduction in re-
quirements  will not  result in an in-
creased risk of movement of fluids into
an  underground   source  of  drinking
water.
  (c)   When  reducing  requirements
under paragraph (a) or (b) of this sec-
tion, the Director shall prepare a fact
sheet under §124.8  explaining the rea-
sons for the action.

§ 144.17 Records.
  The  Director or the Administrator
may require, by written notice on a se-
lective well-by-well basis, an owner or
operator of an injection well to estab-
lish and maintain records, make re-
ports, conduct monitoring, and provide
other  information  as is  deemed nec-
essary to determine whether the owner
or operator has acted or is acting in
compliance  with  Part C of the SDWA
or its implementing regulations.
[58 PR 63895, Dec. 3, 1993]

    Subpart C—Authorization of
  Underground Injection by Rule

§ 144.21 Existing Class I, II (except en-
    hanced  recovery and hydrocarbon
    storage) and III wells.
  (a) An existing Class I, II (except en-
hanced recovery and hydrocarbon stor-
age) and III injection well is authorized
by rule if the  owner or operator injects
into the existing well within one year
after the date at which a UIC program
authorized under  the SDWA becomes
effective for the first time or inven-
tories the well pursuant to the require-
ments of § 144.26. An owner  or operator
of a well which is authorized by rule
pursuant to this  section shall rework,
operate, maintain,  convert,  plug, aban-
don or inject into  the well in compli-
ance with applicable regulations.
  (b) Duration of well authorization  by
rule. Well authorization under this sec-
tion expires upon the effective date of
a permit  issued  pursuant to §§144.25,
144.31,  144.33 or 144.34;  after  plugging
and  abandonment in accordance  with
an approved plugging and abandonment
plan pursuant to §§144.28(c) and 146.10,
and upon submission of a plugging and
abandonment   report   pursuant   to
§144.28(k); or upon  conversion in com-
pliance with §144.28(j).
  (c) Prohibitions on injection. An owner
or operator of a well authorized by rule
pursuant to this section is prohibited
from injecting into the well:
  (1) Upon the effective  date  of an ap-
plicable permit denial;
  (2) Upon failure to submit  a permit
application in a timely manner pursu-
ant to §§144.25 or 144.31;
  (3) Upon failure to submit inventory
information in a timely manner pursu-
ant to § 144.26;
  (4) Upon failure to comply with  a re-
quest for information in a timely man-
ner pursuant to § 144.27;
  (5) Upon  failure  to  provide alter-
native  financial assurance pursuant to
§144.28(d)(7);
  (6) Forty-eight hours after receipt of
a determination by the Director pursu-
ant to §144.28(f)(3) that the well lacks
mechanical integrity, unless the Direc-
tor requires  immediate cessation;
  (7) Upon receipt of notification  from
the Director pursuant to §144.28(1) that
the transferee has not demonstrated fi-
nancial  responsibility  pursuant  to
§144.28(d);
  (8) For Class I and III wells:
  (i) In States with approved programs,
five  years after  the effective date of
the UIC program unless a timely and
complete permit application is pending
the Director's decision; or
  (ii) In States with programs adminis-
tered by EPA, one year after the effec-
tive date  of the UIC program unless a
timely and  complete  permit applica-
tion is pending the Director's decision;
or
  (9) For Class  II  wells  (except en-
hanced recovery and hydrocarbon  stor-
age), five  years after the effective date
of the UIC program unless a timely and
complete permit application is pending
the Director's decision.
  (d) Class II  and III  wells in existing
fields or projects. Notwithstanding the
                                     632

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §144.23
prohibition in §144.11, this section au-
thorizes Class II and Class III wells or
projects in existing fields or projects to
continue normal operations until per-
mitted,  including  construction,  oper-
ation, and plugging and abandonment
of wells as part of the operation, pro-
vided the owner or operator maintains
compliance with all applicable require-
ments.
  (e) Requirements.  The owner or oper-
ator of  a  well authorized under this
section shall  comply with the applica-
ble requirements of § 144.28 and part 147
of this chapter no  later than one year
after authorization.

[48 FR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
PR 20181, May  11, 1984; 58 PR  63895, Dec. 3,
1993]

§ 144.22  Existing Class II enhanced re-
    covery  and  hydrocarbon  storage
    wells.
  (a) An existing Class II enhanced re-
covery  or  hydrocarbon storage injec-
tion well is authorized by rule for the
life of the  well or project, if the owner
or  operator  injects into the  existing
well within  one year after  the date
which a  UIC program authorized under
the  SDWA becomes effective for the
first time  or  inventories the  well pur-
suant to the requirements of  §144.26.
An owner or operator of a well which is
authorized by rule pursuant to this sec-
tion shall  rework, operate, maintain,
convert, plug, abandon or inject into
the well in compliance with applicable
regulations.
  (b) Duration of well authorization by
rule. Well authorization under this sec-
tion expires upon the  effective  date of
a  permit issued pursuant  to  §§144.25,
144.31,  144.33  or  144.34; after  plugging
and abandonment  in  accordance with
an approved plugging and abandonment
plan pursuant to §§144.28(c) and  146.10
of this chapter, and upon submission of
a  plugging and abandonment  report
pursuant to §144.28(k); or upon conver-
sion in compliance with §144.28(j).
  (c) Prohibitions on injection. An owner
or operator of a well authorized by rule
pursuant to this section is prohibited
from injecting into the well:
  (1) Upon  the effective date  of an ap-
plicable permit denial;
  (2) Upon failure to submit a permit
application in a timely manner pursu-
ant to §§144.25 or 144.31;
  (3) Upon failure to submit inventory
information in a timely manner pursu-
ant to §144.26;
  (4) Upon failure  to comply with a re-
quest for information in a timely man-
ner pursuant to §144.27;
  (5)  Upon failure  to provide  alter-
native financial assurance pursuant to
§144.28(d)(7);
  (6) Forty-eight hours after receipt of
a determination by the Director pursu-
ant to §144.28(f)(3) that the  well lacks
mechanical integrity, unless the Direc-
tor requires immediate cessation; or
  (7) Upon receipt of notification from
the Director pursuant to §144.28(1) that
the transferee has not demonstrated fi-
nancial  responsibility  pursuant  to
§144.28(d).
  (d) Requirements. The owner or  oper-
ator of a  well  authorized under  this
section shall comply with the applica-
ble requirements of § 144.28 and part 147
of this chapter. Such owner or operator
shall  comply with the casing and ce-
menting requirements no  later than 3
years and  other requirements no later
than 1 year after authorization.
[49 FR 20181, May 11, 1984, as amended at 58
FR 63896, Dec. 3, 1993]

§144.23 Class IV wells.
  (a) Injection into existing Class IV
wells is authorized for up to six months
after  approval or  promulgation of the
UIC Program. Such wells are subject to
the  requirements  of  §§144.13   and
144.14(c).
  (b)  Closure. For EPA  administered
programs only,
  (1) Prior to abandoning any Class IV
well, the owner or operator  shall plug
or otherwise close the well in a manner
acceptable to  the Regional  Adminis-
trator.
  (2) [Reserved]
  (3) The owner or operator  of a Class
IV well must notify the Regional Ad-
ministrator of intent to abandon the
well at least thirty days prior to aban-
donment.
  (c)  Notwithstanding  the  require-
ments of paragraphs (a) and  (b) of this
section, injection  wells used to  inject
contaminated ground water that has
been treated and is being injected into
                                     633

-------
§144.24
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
the same formation from which, it was
drawn are  authorized by rule for the
life of the  well if such subsurface em-
placement  of  fluids  is  approved  by
EPA, or a State, pursuant to provisions
for cleanup of releases under the Com-
prehensive   Environmental  Response,
Compensation,  and Liability  Act of
1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675, or
pursuant to  requirements  and provi-
sions under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery  Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C.
6901-6992k.
[49 FR 20181, May 11, 1984, as amended at 60
FR 33932,  June 29, 1995; 64 FR 68566, Dec. 7,
1999]

§ 144.24  Class V wells.
  (a) A Class V injection well is author-
ized by rule, subject to the conditions
in §144.84
  (b)  Duration  of  well authorization by
rule. Well authorization under this sec-
tion expires upon the effective date of
a  permit issued  pursuant to §§144.25,
144.31, 144.33  or 144.34, or upon proper
closure of the well.
  (c) Prohibition of injection. An owner
or operator of a well  which is author-
ized by rule pursuant to this section is
prohibited  from injecting into the well:
  (1) Upon  the  effective date of an ap-
plicable permit denial;
  (2) Upon  failure  to  submit a permit
application in a timely manner pursu-
ant to §§144.25 or 144.31;
  (3) Upon  failure to submit inventory
information in  a timely manner pursu-
ant to § 144.26; or
  (4) Upon  failure  to comply with a re-
quest for information in a timely man-
ner pursuant to §144.27.
[58 FR 63896, Dec. 3, 1993, as amended at 64
FR 68566, Dec. 7, 1999]

§ 144.25  Requiring a permit.
  (a)  The  Director may  require  the
owner or operator of any Class I, II, III
or V injection well which is authorized
by rule under this subpart to apply for
and obtain an  individual or area UIC
permit. Cases where individual or area
UIC permits may be required include:
  (1) The injection well is not in  com-
pliance with any  requirement  of the
rule;
  NOTE: Any underground  injection which
violates any authorization by rule is subject
to appropriate enforcement action.
  (2) The injection  well  is not;  or no
longer is within  the category of wells
and types of well operations authorized
in the rule;
  (3) The protection of USDWs requires
that the injection operation be regu-
lated by requirements, such as for  cor-
rective  action, monitoring and report-
ing,  or  operation, which are not con-
tained in the rule.
  (4) When  the injection well is a Class
I, II (except existing enhanced recovery
and hydrocarbon  storage) or III well, in
accordance with a schedule established
by the Director pursuant to §144.31(c).
  (b) Por EPA-administered  programs,
the  Regional Administrator may  re-
quire an owner or operator of any well
which is authorized by rule under  this
subpart to apply for an  individual or
area UIC permit under this  paragraph
only if the owner or operator has been
notified in  writing that a permit appli-
cation is required. The owner or oper-
ator of a well which is  authorized by
rule  under this  subpart  is prohibited
from injecting into the  well  upon the
effective date of permit denial, or upon
failure by the owner or operator to sub-
mit an application in a timely manner
as specified in the  notice. The  notice
shall include: a brief statement  of the
reasons for requiring a permit; an ap-
plication form; a statement setting a
time for the owner  or operator  to file
the application; and a statement of the
consequences  of  denial or issuance of
the permit, or failure to submit  an ap-
plication,  as  described  in this para-
graph.
  (c) An owner or operator of a well au-
thorized by rule may request to  be ex-
cluded from  the  coverage of this sub-
part by applying for an  individual or
area UIC permit. The owner  or oper-
ator shall submit an application under
§144.31 with reasons supporting the re-
quest,  to the Director.   The Director
may grant  any such requests.
[48 FR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
FR 20182, May 11, 1984; 58 FR 63896,  Dec. 3,
1993]

§ 144.26  Inventory requirements.
  The owner or operator of an injection
well  which is authorized by rule under
this  subpart shall submit inventory in-
formation  to the  Director.  Such  an
owner  or operator  is  prohibited from
                                     634

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §144.27
injecting into the well upon failure to
submit inventory information  for the
well within the time frame specified in
paragraph (d) of this section.
  (a) Contents. As part of the inventory,
the  Director shall  require  and the
owner/operator shall  provide at least
the following information:
  (1) Facility name and location;
  (2) Name and address  of legal con-
tact;
  (3) Ownership of facility;
  (4) Nature and type of injection wells;
and
  (5)  Operating   status  of  injection
wells.
  NOTE: This information is requested on na-
tional form "Inventory of Injection Wells,"
OMB No. 158-R0170.
  (b) Additional contents.  For EPA ad-
ministered  programs  only, the owner
or operator  of a  well listed in para-
graph  (b)(l)  of this section shall pro-
vide the information  listed  in  para-
graph (b)(2) of this section.
  (1) This  section applies  to  the fol-
lowing wells:
  (i) Class II enhanced recovery  wells;
  (ii) Class IV wells;
  (iii) The following Class V wells:
  (A)  Sand  or  other backfill  wells
[§ 146.5(e)(8Xl;
  (B) Radioactive waste disposal wells
that are not Class I wells (40 CFR 146.5
  (C) Geothermal energy recovery wells
[§146.5(e)(12)];
  (D)    Brine   return    flow    wells
[§146.5(e)(14)];
  (E) Wells used in experimental tech-
nologies [§146.5(e)(15)];
  (F) Municipal and industrial disposal
wells other than Class I; and
  (G)  Any other Class  V  wells at the
discretion of  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator.
  (2) The  owner or  operator  of a well
listed in paragraph (b)(l) shall provide
a listing of all wells owned or operated
setting forth the following information
for each well.  (A single description  of
wells at a single facility with substan-
tially  the same characteristics  is ac-
ceptable).
  (i)  For  Class  II  only,  the  field
name(s);
  (ii) Location of each well or project
given  by  Township, Range, Section,
and Quarter-Section, or by latitude and
longitude to  the nearest second, ac-
cording to the conventional practice in
the State;
  (iii) Date of completion of each well;
  (iv) Identification and depth of the
formation(s) into which each well is in-
jecting;
  (v) Total depth of each well;
  (vi)  Casing and cementing  record,
tubing size, and depth of packer;
  (vii) Nature of the injected fluids;
  (viii)  Average  and maximum injec-
tion pressure at the wellhead;
  (ix) Average and maximum injection
rate; and
  (x) Date of the last mechanical integ-
rity test, if any.
  (c) Notice. Upon approval of the UIC
Program in a State, the Director shall
notify  owners or operators of injection
wells of their duty to submit inventory
information.  Tl^e method of notifica-
tion selected by the Director must as-
sure that the owners or operators will
be  made  aware  of the  inventory re-
quirement.
  (d) Deadlines. (1) The owner or  oper-
ator of an injection well shall submit
inventory information no  later  than
one year after the date  of approval or
effective date of the UIC program for
the State. The  Director need not re-
quire  inventory  information from any
facility  with  interim  status  under
RCRA.
  (2) For  EPA administered programs
the information need not be submitted
if a complete permit application is sub-
mitted within one year of the effective
data of the UIC program. The owner or
operator of Class IV well shall submit
inventory information no later than 60
days after the effective date of the pro-
gram.
[48 FR 14189, Apr.  1, 1983, as amended at 49
PR  20182, May 11, 1984; 58 PR 63896, Dec. 3,
1993; 64 PR 68566,  Deo. 7, 1999; 67  PR 39593,
June 7, 2002]

§ 144.27 Requiring other information.
  (a) For  EPA administered programs
only, in addition  to the inventory re-
quirements of § 144.26, the Regional Ad-
ministrator may require the owner or
operator of any well authorized by rule
under this subpart to submit informa-
tion as deemed  necessary by the Re-
gional   Administrator   to   determine
whether a well may be endangering an
                                     635

-------
§144.28
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
underground source  of drinking water
in violation of §144.12 of this part.
  (b)  Such  information  requirements
may include, but are not limited to:
  (1)  Performance  of  ground-water
monitoring  and the  periodic submis-
sion of reports of such monitoring;
  (2) An analysis of injected fluids, in-
cluding periodic  submission  of such
analyses; and
  (3) A description of the geologic stra-
ta through and into  which injection is
taking place.
  (c) Any request for information under
this section shall be made  in writing,
and  include  a  brief statement  of the
reasons for  requiring the information.
An  owner or operator shall  submit the
information within the time period(s)
provided in the notice.
  (d) An owner or operator of an injec-
tion well authorized  by rule under this
subpart is  prohibited from injecting
into the well upon failure of the owner
or operator to comply with a request
for  information within  the time pe-
riod(s) specified by the Director pursu-
ant to paragraph (c)  of this section. An
owner or operator of a well prohibited
from injection under this section shall
not resume injection  except  under a
permit  issued pursuant to  §§144.25,
144.31, 144.33 or 144.34.
[49 FR 20182, May 11, 1984, as amended  at 58
FB 63896, Dec. 3, 1993]

§144.28  Requirements for Class I, II,
    and III wells authorized by rule.
  The following requirements apply to
the owner or operator of a Class I, II or
III  well authorized by rule  under this
subpart, as  provided by §§144.21(e) and
144.22(d).
  (a) The owner or operator shall com-
ply with all applicable requirements of
this subpart and subpart B of this part.
Any noncompliance with these require-
ments constitutes a violation  of the
Safe  Drinking Water  Act  and  is
grounds for  enforcement  action,  except
that the owner or operator need not
comply with these requirements to the
extent and for the duration such non-
compliance  is authorized by an emer-
gency permit under § 144.34.
  (b)  Twenty-four  hour reporting.  The
owner or operator shall report any non-
compliance which may endanger health
or the environment, including:
  (1) Any monitoring or other informa-
tion which indicates that any contami-
nant may cause an endangerment to a
USDW; or
  (2) Any noncompliance or malfunc-
tion of the injection system which may
cause fluid migration into or between
USDWs.
Any information shall be provided oral-
ly within 24  hours from the time the
owner  or operator becomes  aware of
the circumstances. A written submis-
sion shall also  be  provided within five
days of the time the owner or operator
becomes  aware  of the  circumstances.
The written submission shall contain a
description of the  noncompliance and
its  cause, the period of noncompliance,
including exact dates and times, and if
the noncompliance has not  been cor-
rected, the anticipated time it is ex-
pected to  continue; and steps taken or
planned to reduce, eliminate, and pre-
vent recurrence of  the noncompliance.
  (c) Plugging and abandonment plan. (1)
The owner or  operator shall prepare,
maintain, and comply with a plan for
plugging and abandonment of the well
or project that  meets the requirements
of § 146.10 of this chapter and  is accept-
able to the Director. For purposes of
this paragraph, temporary  intermit-
tent cessation  of  injection operations
is not abandonment.
  (2) For EPA administered programs:
  (i) The owner or operator shall sub-
mit the plan,  on a form provided by the
Regional Administrator, no later than
one year after the  effective date of the
UIC program  in the state.
  (ii) The owner or operator  shall sub-
mit any proposed  significant revision
to the  method  of plugging reflected in
the plan no  later  than the  notice of
plugging required  by  §144.28(j)(2)  (i.e.,
45 days prior  to plugging unless shorter
notice is approved).
  (iii) The plan shall include the fol-
lowing information:
  (A) The nature and quantity and ma-
terial to be used in plugging;
  (B)  The location  and  extent (by
depth) of the  plugs;
  (C) Any  proposed test  or  measure-
ment to be made;
  (D) The  amount, size,  and location
(by depth) of casing to be left in the
well;
                                    636

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.28
  (E)  The method and  location where
casing is to be parted; and
  (F) [Reserved]
  (G)  The estimated  cost  of  plugging
the well.
  (iv) After a cessation of operations of
two years the owner  or operator shall
plug and abandon the well in accord-
ance with the plan unless he:
  (A)  Provides notice to the  Regional
Administrator;
  (B)  Describe actions  or  procedures,
satisfactory to the Regional  Adminis-
trator, that the owner or operator will
take to ensure that the well will not
endanger USDWs during the period of
temporary abandonment. These actions
and procedures shall include compli-
ance with the technical requirements
applicable to active injection wells un-
less waived  by the Regional  Adminis-
trator.
  (v) The owner or operator of any well
that has been temporarily abandoned
[ceased operations for more than two
years and has met the requirements of
paragraphs (c)(2) (A) and (B) of this sec-
tion] shall notify the Regional Admin-
istrator prior to resuming operation of
the well.
  (d)  Financial responsibility.  (1)  The
owner, operator and/or, for EPA-admin-
istered  programs,  the transferor  of a
Class I, II or III  well, is  required  to
demonstrate and maintain financial re-
sponsibility and  resources  to close,
plug and abandon  the underground in-
jection operation  in  a manner  pre-
scribed by the Director until:
  (i) The  well has been plugged and
abandoned  in  accordance with an ap-
proved plugging and abandonment plan
pursuant to §§144.28(c)  and 146.10 and
submission of a plugging and  abandon-
ment report has been made pursuant to
§144.28(k);
  (ii)  The well has been converted  in
compliance  with  the requirements  of
§144.28(j); or
  (iii) For EPA-administered programs,
the transferor has  received notice from
the Director  that the  transferee has
demonstrated  financial  responsibility
for the well.  The owner  or  operator
shall  show evidence of such  financial
responsibility  to  the Director by the
submission of a surety bond,  or other
adequate assurance, such as a  financial
statement.
  (2) For EPA-administered programs,
the owner or  operator shall  submit
such evidence no later than one year
after the effective date of the UIC pro-
gram  in the  State. Where the owner-
ship or  operational  control of the well
is transferred more  than one year after
the effective  date of the UIC program,
the transferee  shall submit such evi-
dence no later  than the date specified
in  the  notice  required  pursuant to
§144.28(1X2).
  (3) For EPA  administered programs
the Regional  Administrator may  re-
quire  the owner or  operator to submit
a revised demonstration of financial re-
sponsibility if  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator has  reason to  believe that the
original  demonstration  is no longer
adequate to cover the cost of closing,
plugging and abandoning the well.
  (4) For EPA  administered programs
the owner or operator of a well inject-
ing hazardous waste must comply with
the financial  responsibility  require-
ments of subpart F of this part.
  (5) For EPA-administered programs,
an owner or  operator must notify the
Regional  Administrator  by  certified
mail of  the commencement of any vol-
untary   or  involuntary  proceeding
under Title  11 (Bankruptcy)  of the
United  States  Code which names the
owner or operator as  debtor, within 10
business days after  the commencement
of the proceeding. Any party acting as
guarantor for the owner or operator for
the purpose of  financial responsibility
must  so notify the  Regional  Adminis-
trator,  if the guarantor  is named as
debtor in any such proceeding.
  (6) In  the event of commencement of
a  proceeding  specified  in  paragraph
(d)(5)  of this section, an owner or oper-
ator  who  has  furnished a  financial
statement  for  the  purpose  of  dem-
onstrating    financial   responsibility
under this  section  shall be deemed to
be in  violation  of this paragraph until
an  alternative  financial  assurance
demonstration  acceptable to  the Re-
gional Administrator is provided either
by  the  owner  or operator  or by its
trustee  in  bankruptcy,  receiver, or
other authorized  party.  All  parties
shall be prohibited  from injecting into
the well until such  alternate financial
assurance is provided.
                                    637

-------
§144.28
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (e) Casing and cementing requirements.
For  enhanced  recovery and hydro-
carbon storage wells:
  (1) The owner or operator shall case
and cement the well to prevent move-
ment of fluids into or between under-
ground  sources  of drinking water.  In
determining and specifying casing and
cementing  requirements, the following
factors shall be considered:
  (i) Depth to the injection zone;
  (ii)  Depth  to  the  bottom of  all
USDWs; and
  (iii) Estimated maximum and  aver-
age injection pressures.
  (2) In addition,  in  determining and
specifying  casing  and  cementing  re-
quirements the  Director may consider
information on:
  (i) Nature of formation fluids;
  (ii)  Lithology of injection and con-
fining zones;
  (iii) External pressure, internal pres-
sure, and axial loading;
  (iv) Hole  size;
  (v)  Size   and grade  of all casing
strings; and
  (vi) Class of cement.
  (3) The  requirements in paragraphs
(e) (1) and  (2)  of this section need not
apply if:
  (i) Regulatory controls for casing and
cementing  existed at the time  of drill-
ing of the well and the well is  in com-
pliance with those controls; and
  (ii) Well  injection will not result  in
the movement of fluids into an under-
ground  source of drinking water  so  as
to  create  a  significant  risk  to the
health of persons.
  (4) When a State did not have  regu-
latory controls for casing and cement-
ing prior to the  time of the submission
of the State program to the Adminis-
trator, the Director need not apply the
casing and cementing requirements  in
paragraph  (e)(l) of this section  if  he
submits as a part of his application for
primacy, an appropriate plan for casing
and cementing of  existing, newly con-
verted, and newly drilled wells in  exist-
ing fields,  and  the Administrator ap-
proves the plan.
  (f) Operating requirements.  (1) Injec-
tion between the outermost casing pro-
tecting  underground sources of drink-
ing water and the well bore is prohib-
ited.
  (2) The owner or operator of a Class I,
II or III injection  well authorized by
rule shall establish and maintain me-
chanical integrity as defined in §146.8
of this chapter until  the  well is prop-
erly plugged in accordance with an ap-
proved plugging and abandonment plan
pursuant to §§144.28(c) and 146.10, and a
plugging and abandonment report pur-
suant  to §144.28(k) is  submitted, or
until the well is  converted in compli-
ance with §144.28(j). For EPA-adminis-
tered programs, the Regional Adminis-
trator may require by  written notice
that  the owner  or  operator  comply
with  a  schedule  describing when me-
chanical   integrity   demonstrations
shall be made.
  (3)  When the  Director determines
that a Class I (non-hazardous), II or III
injection well lacks mechanical integ-
rity pursuant to §146.8 of  this chapter,
the Director shall give written notice
of his determination  to the owner or
operator. Unless  the Director requires
immediate  cessation,  the  owner or op-
erator shall cease  injection  into the
well within 48  hours  of receipt of the
Director's determination.  The Director
may allow  plugging of the well in ac-
cordance  with  the  requirements of
§146.10 of this chapter,  or require the
owner or operator to  perform such ad-
ditional construction, operation, moni-
toring, reporting  and  corrective action
as is necessary to  prevent the move-
ment of fluid into  or between USDWs
caused by  the  lack of mechanical in-
tegrity. The owner or operator may re-
sume injection upon receipt of written
notification from the  Director that the
owner or operator has  demonstrated
mechanical integrity pursuant to §146.8
of this chapter.
  (4) The Director may allow the owner
or operator of a  well which lacks me-
chanical   integrity    pursuant   to
§146.8(a)(l)  of this chapter to  continue
or resume injection if the owner or op-
erator has made a satisfactory dem-
onstration  that there is no movement
of fluid into or between USDWs.
  (5) For Class I wells, unless an alter-
native to a packer has been approved
under  §146.12(c)  of this  chapter, the
owner or operator shall fill the annulus
between the tubing and the long string
of casings with a  fluid approved by the
Director and maintain a pressure, also
                                    638

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.28
approved by the Director, on the annu-
lus.  For EPA administered  programs,
the owner or operator of a Class I well
completed with tubing and packer shall
fill the  annulus between tubing  and
casing with  a noncorrosive fluid  and
maintain a positive pressure on the an-
nulus. For  other Class  I wells,  the
owner or operator shall insure that the
alternative completion method will re-
liably provide a comparable level of
protection  to underground sources of
drinking water.
  (6) Injection pressure.
  (i) For Class I and III wells:
  (A) Except  during stimulation,  the
owner or operator shall not exceed an
injection  pressure  at  the wellhead
which shall be calculated so as to as-
sure that the pressure during injection
does not initiate new fractures  or prop-
agate  existing fractures  in  the injec-
tion zone; and
  (B) The owner or  operator shall  not
inject at a pressure which will  initiate
fractures in the confining zone or cause
the   movement   of  injection   or
formation fluids  into an underground
source of drinking water.
  (ii) For Class II wells:
  (A) The owner or  operator shall  not
exceed a maximum  injection pressure
at the wellhead which  shall  be  cal-
culated so as to assure that the pres-
sure during injection does not  initiate
new   fractures of propagate existing
fractures in  the  confining zone adja-
cent to the USDWs; and
  (B) The owner or  operator shall  not
inject at a pressure  which will cause
the movement of injection  or  forma-
tion fluids into an underground source
of drinking water.
  (g)   Monitoring   requirements.  The
owner or operator shall  perform  the
monitoring as described  in this para-
graph.  For  EPA  administered  pro-
grams, monitoring of the  nature of the
injected fluids shall comply with appli-
cable analytical methods  cited and de-
scribed in table I of 40 CFR 136.3 or in
appendix III  of 40 CFR part 261 or by
other methods that have been approved
by the Regional Administrator.
  (1) The owner or operator of a Class I
well  shall:
  (i)  Analyze  the nature of the injected
fluids  with  sufficient  frequency   to
yield data representative of their char-
acteristics;
  (ii) Install and use continuous record-
ing devices  to monitor injection pres-
sure, flow  rate  and  volume, and  the
pressure on the  annulus between  the
tubing and the long string of casing;
  (iii) Install and use monitoring wells
within the area of review if required by
the Director, to monitor any migration
of fluids into and pressure in the under-
ground  sources of drinking water. The
type, number and location of the wells,
the parameters to be measured, and the
frequency of monitoring  must be  ap-
proved by the Director.
  (2) For Class II wells:
  (i) The owner or operator shall mon-
itor the nature  of  the injected fluids
with sufficient frequency  to yield data
representative of their characteristics.
For EPA administered programs,  this
frequency shall be at least once within
the first year of the authorization and
thereafter when changes  are  made to
the fluid.
  (ii) The owner  or operator shall  ob-
serve the injection  pressure, flow rate,
and cumulative  volume at least with
the following frequencies:
  (A) Weekly  for produced fluid  dis-
posal operations;
  (B) Monthly for  enhanced  recovery
operations;
  (C) Daily during the injection of  liq-
uid  hydrocarbons  and  injection  for
withdrawal of stored hydrocarbons; and
  (D) Daily  during  the injection phase
of cyclic steam operations.
  (iii)  The  owner  or  operator shall
record   one  observation  of injection
pressure, flow rate and cumulative vol-
ume at  reasonable intervals no greater
than thirty days.
  (iv) For enhanced recovery and  hy-
drocarbon storage wells:
  (A) The owner  or  operator shall dem-
onstrate mechanical  integrity  pursu-
ant to  §146.8 of this chapter at least
once every five years during the life of
the injection well.
  (B) For EPA administered programs,
the Regional Administrator by written
notice may  require  the owner or oper-
ator to comply with a schedule describ-
ing when such demonstrations shall be
made.
                                    639

-------
§144.28
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (C) For EPA administered programs,
the owner  or operator  of any well re-
quired to be tested for mechanical in-
tegrity shall  notify the Regional  Ad-
ministrator at least  30 days prior to
any required mechanical integrity test.
The Regional Administrator may allow
a shorter notification period if it would
be sufficient to enable EPA to witness
the mechanical integrity testing if it
chose.  Notification may be  in the form
of a yearly  or quarterly  schedule of
planned mechanical integrity tests, or
it may be on an individual basis.
  (v) The owner or operator of a hydro-
carbon  storage or enhanced recovery
wells may  monitor them by manifold
monitoring on a field or project basis
rather than on an individual well basis
if such facilities consist of more than
one injection well, operate with a com-
mon manifold, and provided the owner
or operator demonstrates to the Direc-
tor that manifold monitoring is com-
parable to individual well monitoring.
  (3)(i) For Class III wells the owner or
operator shall provide to the Director a
qualitative analysis and ranges in con-
centrations of all constituents of in-
jected  fluids at least once within the
first year of authorization and there-
after  whenever the  injection fluid is
modified to the extent  that the initial
data are incorrect or incomplete. The
owner  or operator may  request Federal
confidentiality as specified in 40 CFR
part 2. If the information is proprietary
the owner  or operator  may in lieu of
the ranges  in concentrations choose to
submit   maximum    concentrations
which  shall not be exceeded. In such a
case the owner or operator  shall retain
records of  the undisclosed concentra-
tions and provide them  upon request to
the Regional Administrator as part of
any enforcement investigation; and
  (ii) Monitor injection  pressure and ei-
ther flow rate or volume semi-monthly,
or meter and record daily injected and
produced fluid volumes as appropriate;
  (iii) Monitor the fluid level in the in-
jection zone semi-monthly, where ap-
propriate;
  (iv) All Class III wells may be mon-
itored  on a field or project basis rather
than an individual well basis by mani-
fold  monitoring. Manifold  monitoring
may be used in cases of facilities con-
sisting of more than one injection well,
operating with a  common  manifold.
Separate monitoring systems for each
well  are  not  required provided  the
owner or operator demonstrates to the
Director that manifold monitoring is
comparable  to individual well  moni-
toring.
  (h) Reporting requirements. The  owner
or operator shall submit reports to the
Director as follows:
  (1) For  Class I wells, quarterly re-
ports on:
  (i) The physical, chemical, and other
relevant characteristics of the  injec-
tion fluids;
  (ii) Monthly average, maximum, and
minimum values  for injection pressure,
flow  rate  and  volume,  and  annular
pressure;
  (iii) The results from ground-water
monitoring  wells prescribed  in  para-
graph (g)(l)(iii) of this section;
  (iv) The results of any test of the in-
jection well conducted by the owner or
operator during the reported quarter if
required by the Director; and
  (v)  Any  well work over performed
during the reported quarter.
  (2) For Class II wells:
  (i) An annual report  to the Director
summarizing the  results of all  moni-
toring, as required in paragraph (g)(2)
of this section. Such summary shall in-
clude  monthly  records  of  injected
fluids, and any major changes in char-
acteristics or sources of injected fluids.
Previously submitted information may
be included by reference.
  (ii) The owner  or operator of hydro-
carbon storage and enhanced recovery
projects  may  report  on a  field or
project basis  rather than on an indi-
vidual well basis  where manifold moni-
toring is used.
  (3) For Class III wells:
  (i) Quarterly reporting on all  moni-
toring, as required in paragraph (g)(3)
of this section;
  (ii) Quarterly reporting of the results
of any periodic tests required by the
Director that are performed during the
reported quarter;
  (iii) Monitoring may be reported on a
project or field basis rather than an in-
dividual  well  basis  where  manifold
monitoring is used.
  (i) Retention of records. The owner or
operator  shall retain  records  of all
                                     640

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.31
monitoring information, including the
following:
  (1)   Calibration  and  maintenance
records and all original strip chart re-
cordings for continuous monitoring in-
strumentation,  and copies  of  all re-
ports required by this section, for a pe-
riod of at least three  years from the
date  of the sample, measurement,  or
report. This period may be extended by
request of  the Director at  any time;
and
  (2) The nature and composition of all
injected fluids until three years  after
the  completion of any plugging and
abandonment    procedures   specified
under §144.52(1)(6). The Director may
require the owner or  operator to de-
liver the records to the Director at the
conclusion of the retention period. For
EPA administered programs, the owner
or operator shall continue to retain the
records after the  three year retention
period unless he delivers the records to
the Regional Administrator  or obtains
written approval from the Regional Ad-
ministrator to discard the records.
  (j)  Notice of  abandonment.  (1) The
owner or  operator shall notify the Di-
rector, according  to a  time  period re-
quired by the Director, before conver-
sion or abandonment of the well.
  (2)  For  EPA-administered  programs,
the owner or operator shall  notify the
Regional  Administrator  at  least  45
days before plugging and abandonment.
The Regional Administrator, at his dis-
cretion, may allow a shorter notice pe-
riod.
  (k) Plugging and abandonment report.
For EPA-administered programs, with-
in 60 days after plugging a  well or at
the time  of the next quarterly report
(whichever  is  less) the owner or oper-
ator shall submit a report to the Re-
gional Administrator.  If the  quarterly
report is  due  less than 15 days before
completion of plugging, then the report
shall be submitted within 60 days. The
report shall be certified as accurate by
the person who performed the plugging
operation. Such report  shall consist of
either:
  (1)  A statement that the  well was
plugged in  accordance with the  plan
previously submitted to the Regional
Administrator; or
  (2)  Where actual  plugging differed
from the plan previously submitted, an
updated  version  of the plan, on  the
form supplied by the Regional Admin-
istrator,  specifying the different proce-
dures used.
  (1) Change of ownership or operational
control.  For  EPA-administered  pro-
grams:
  (1) The transferor of a Class I, II or
III well authorized by rule shall notify
the Regional Administrator of a trans-
fer of ownership or operational control
of the  well at least 30 days in advance
of the proposed transfer.
  (2) The notice shall include a written
agreement between the transferor  and
the  transferee containing a  specific
date for  transfer  of ownership or oper-
ational control of the well; and a spe-
cific date when the financial  responsi-
bility demonstration of §144.28(d) will
be met by the transferee.
  (3) The transferee is authorized to in-
ject  unless  he  receives  notification
from the Director  that the transferee
has not demonstrated financial respon-
sibility pursuant to §144.28(d).
  (m) Requirements for Class I hazardous
waste wells. The  owner or operator of
any  Class  I  well injecting hazardous
waste shall comply with §144.14(c). In
addition,  for  EPA-administered  pro-
grams  the  owner or  operator  shall
properly  dispose  of, or decontaminate
by removing all hazardous waste resi-
dues, all  injection well equipment.

[49 FR 20182, May 11,  1984, as amended at 58
FR 63897, Dec. 3, 1993]

   Subpart D—Authorization by
               Permit

§144.31  Application for a permit;  au-
   thorization by permit.
  (a) Permit application. Unless an  un-
derground injection well is authorized
by rule under subpart C of this part, all
injection activities including construc-
tion of an injection well are prohibited
until the owner or operator is author-
ized by permit. An owner or operator of
a well currently  authorized  by  rule
must apply for a permit under this sec-
tion unless well authorization by rule
was for the life of  the well or project.
Authorization  by rule for a well  or
project for which a permit application
has been submitted terminates for  the
well or project upon the effective date
                                     641

-------
§144.31
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of the permit. Procedures for applica-
tions,  issuance and administration of
emergency permits are  found  exclu-
sively in §144.34. A RCRA permit apply-
ing the standards of part 264, subpart C
of this chapter  will constitute  a UIO
permit for hazardous  waste injection
wells for which the technical standards
in part 146 of this chapter are not gen-
erally appropriate.
  (b) Who applies? When a facility or ac-
tivity is owned by one person but is op-
erated by another person, it is the op-
erator's duty to obtain a permit.
  (c) Time to apply. Any person who per-
forms  or proposes an  underground in-
jection for which a permit is or will be
required  shall submit an application to
the Director in  accordance with  the
UIC program as follows:
  (1)  For  existing  wells,  as  expedi-
tiously as practicable and in  accord-
ance with the schedule in any program
description under § 145.23(f) or (for EPA
administered programs) on a schedule
established by  the Regional Adminis-
trator, but no later than 4 years from
the approval or  promulgation  of  the
UIC program,  or  as  required  under
§144.14(b) for wells injecting hazardous
waste. For EPA administered programs
the owner or operator  of  Class I or III
wells shall submit a complete permit
application no later than  1 year after
the effective date of the program.
  (2)  For new injection wells,  except
new wells in projects authorized under
§144.21(d) or authorized by an existing
area permit under §144.33(c), a reason-
able time  before  construction  is  ex-
pected to begin.
  (d)  Completeness.  The Director shall
not issue a permit before receiving a
complete application for  a permit ex-
cept for  emergency permits. An appli-
cation for  a permit is complete when
the Director receives an application
form  and any  supplemental  informa-
tion which are completed to his or her
satisfaction. The completeness of any
application for a permit shall be judged
independently of  the  status  of  any
other permit application or permit for
the same facility or activity. For EPA-
administered programs, an application
which is reviewed under §124.3 is com-
plete when the Director receives either
a complete application or the informa-
tion listed in a notice of deficiency.
  (e) Information requirements. All appli-
cants for permits shall provide the fol-
lowing  information to  the Director,
using the application form provided by
the Director.
  (1) The  activities conducted by the
applicant  which  require  it to obtain
permits under RCRA,  UIC,  the   Na-
tional Pollution Discharge Elimination
system  (NPDES)  program  under  the
Clean Water Act, or the Prevention of
Significant  Deterioration (PSD)  pro-
gram under the Clean Air Act.
  (2) Name,  mailing address, and loca-
tion of the facility for which the appli-
cation is submitted.
  (3) Up to  four SIC codes  which  best
reflect the principal products or serv-
ices provided by the facility.
  (4)  The  operator's  name,  address,
telephone number,  ownership status,
and status as Federal,  State, private,
public, or other entity.
  (5) Whether the facility is located on
Indian lands.
  (6) A  listing of all permits  or  con-
struction approvals received or applied
for under any of  the  following  pro-
grams:
  (i)  Hazardous  Waste  Management
program under RCRA.
  (ii) UIC program under SDWA.
  (iii) NPDES program under CWA.
  (iv) Prevention of Significant Dete-
rioration  (PSD)  program  under   the
Clean Air Act.
  (v)  Nonattainment  program  under
the Clean Air Act.
  (vi) National Emission Standards for
Hazardous   Pollutants   (NESHAPS)
preconstruction  approval  under   the
Clean Air Act.
  (vii)  Ocean  dumping  permits under
the Marine  Protection Research   and
Sanctuaries Act.
  (viii)  Dredge and fill permits under
section 404 of CWA.
  (ix)  Other  relevant  environmental
permits, including State permits.
  (7) A topographic map (or other  map
if a topographic map is unavailable) ex-
tending one mile beyond  the  property
boundaries of  the source depicting the
facility and  each of its  intake and dis-
charge  structures;  each of  its  haz-
ardous  waste  treatment,  storage,  or
disposal facilities;  each  well  where
fluids from the facility are injected un-
derground;  and those  wells, springs,
                                    642

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §144.32
and other  surface  water  bodies,  and
drinking-  water wells  listed in public
records or otherwise known to the ap-
plicant within a quarter mile of the fa-
cility property boundary.
  (8) A brief description of the nature
of the business.
  (9) For EPA-administered programs,
the applicant shall identify and submit
on a list with  the  permit application
the names and addresses of all owners
of  record  of land within  one-quarter
mile  of the  facility  boundary.  This
requirement  may be  waived  by  the
Regional Administrator where  the  site
is located in a populous area  and the
Regional   Administrator  determines
that the requirement would be imprac-
ticable.
  (10)  A  plugging  and abandonment
plan that meets  the  requirements of
§146.10 of this chapter and is acceptable
to the Director.
  (f) Recordkeeping.  Applicants  shall
keep records  of all data used  to com-
plete permit applications and any sup-
plemental   information   submitted
under § 144.31  for a period of at least 3
years from the date the application is
signed.
  (g) Information Requirements for Class
I Hazardous Waste Injection Wells Per-
mits. (1) The  following information is
required for each active Class I haz-
ardous  waste injection well at a facil-
ity seeking a UIC  permit:
  (i) Dates well was operated.
  (ii) Specification of all wastes which
have been injected in the well,  if avail-
able.
  (2) The  owner or operator of any fa-
cility  containing one  or more active
hazardous waste  injection wells must
submit all  available  information per-
taining to  any release of hazardous
waste or constituents  from any active
hazardous  waste injection well at the
facility.
  (3) The  owner or operator of any fa-
cility  containing one  or more active
Class I hazardous waste injection wells
must conduct such preliminary site in-
vestigations as are necessary to deter-
mine  whether a  release is occurring,
has occurred, or is likely to have oc-
curred.
[48 PR 14189, Apr. 1,  1983, as amended at 49
FR 20185, May 11, 1984; 52 FR 45797, Dec.  1,
1987; 52 FR 46963, Dec. 10, 1987; 58 FR 63897,
Deo. 3, 1993]

§ 144.32  Signatories to permit applica-
   tions and reports.
  (a)  Applications.  All  permit applica-
tions, except those submitted for Class
II wells (see paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion), shall be signed as follows:
  (1) For a corporation: by a responsible
corporate  officer.  For the  purpose of
this section, a responsible corporate of-
ficer  means; (i) A president,  secretary,
treasurer,  or vice president of the cor-
poration in charge of a principal busi-
ness function, or any other person who
performs  similar policy- or  decision-
making functions  for the corporation,
or (ii) the manager of one or more man-
ufacturing, production, or operating fa-
cilities employing more  than 250 per-
sons or having gross annual sales or ex-
penditures  exceeding $25  million (in
second-quarter 1980 dollars),  if author-
ity  to  sign documents  has  been as-
signed or delegated to the manager in
accordance with corporate procedures.
 NOTE: EPA does not require specific assign-
ments or delegations of authority to respon-
sible    corporate   officers   identified  in
§144.32(a)(l)(i). The Agency will presume that
these responsible corporate officers have the
requisite authority  to sign  permit  applica-
tions unless the corporation has notified the
Director to the  contrary. Corporate proce-
dures governing authority to sign permit ap-
plications  may provide  for assignment or
delegation to applicable corporate positions
under  §144.32(a)(l)(ii) rather  than to  specific
individuals.
  (2) For a partnership or  sole proprietor-
ship: by a general partner or the  propri-
etor, respectively; or
  (3)  For a municipality,  State, Federal,
or other public agency: by either  a prin-
cipal  executive officer or  ranking elect-
ed official. For purposes of this section,
a principal executive  officer of  a Fed-
eral agency includes: (i) The chief exec-
utive officer of the agency,  or (ii)  a
senior executive officer having respon-
sibility for the overall operations of a
principal geographic unit of the  agency
(e.g.,  Regional Administrators of EPA).
  (b)  Reports.  All  reports  required by
permits, other  information  requested
                                      643

-------
§144.33
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
by the Director, and all permit applica-
tions submitted for Class II wells under
§144.31 shall be signed by a person de-
scribed in paragraph (a) of this section,
or by a duly authorized representative
of that person. A person is a duly au-
thorized representative only if:
  (1) The authorization is made in writ-
ing by a person described in paragraph
(a) of this section;
  (2) The authorization specifies  either
an individual or a  position having re-
sponsibility for the  overall operation of
the regulated facility or activity, such
as the position of plant manager, oper-
ator of a well or a well field,   super-
intendent, or position of equivalent re-
sponsibility. (A duly  authorized rep-
resentative  may  thus  be  either  a
named individual or any individual oc-
cupying a named position); and
  (3) The written authorization is sub-
mitted to the Director.
  (c) Changes to authorization.  If an au-
thorization under paragraph (b) of this
section is no longer accurate because a
different individual or position has re-
sponsibility for the  overall operation of
the facility,  a  new authorization satis-
fying the requirements of paragraph (b)
of this section must  be submitted  to
the Director prior to  or  together with
any  reports, information, or applica-
tions to be signed by an authorized rep-
resentative.
  (d) Certification. Any person signing a
document under paragraph (a) or (b) of
this  section shall  make  the following
certification:
  I certify under penalty of law that this
document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accord-
ance  with a system designed to assure that
qualified  personnel  properly  gather  and
evaluate the information submitted. Based
on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information,
the information  submitted is, to the  best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. I am aware  that there are signifi-
cant  penalties for submitting false informa-
tion, including the possibility of fine and im-
prisonment for knowing violations.
(Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), Safe
Drinking Water  Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.),
Clean  Air  Act   (42  U.S.C.  Y401  rt  seq.),
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42
U.S.C. 6901 et seq.)
[48 PR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 48
FR 39621, Sept. 1, 1983]

§ 144.33  Area permits.
  (a) The Director may issue a permit
on an area basis,  rather than for each
well  individually,  provided  that  the
permit is for injection wells:
  (1) Described and identified by loca-
tion in permit  application(s) if they are
existing wells,  except that the Director
may  accept a single  description of
wells  with substantially the same char-
acteristics;
  (2) Within the same well field, facil-
ity  site, reservoir, project, or similar
unit in the same State;
  (3) Operated  by a single owner or op-
erator; and
  (4) Used to  inject  other than haz-
ardous waste.
  (b) Area permits shall specify:
  (1)  The area within  which  under-
ground  injections are authorized, and
  (2)  The  requirements  for  construc-
tion, monitoring,  reporting, operation,
and abandonment, for all wells a.uthor-
ized by  the permit.
  (c) The  area permit may  authorize
the permittee to construct and operate,
convert,  or  plug and  abandon wells
within the permit area provided:
  (1) The permittee notifies the Direc-
tor at such time as the permit requires;
  (2) The additional well satisfies the
criteria in paragraph (a) of this section
and meets the requirements specified
in the  permit  under  paragraph (b) of
this section; and
  (3) The  cumulative effects of drilling
and operation   of additional injection
wells  are  considered by  the  Director
during  evaluation  of the area  permit
application and are  acceptable to the
Director.
  (d)  If the Director determines  that
any well constructed pursuant to para-
graph (c) of this section does not  sat-
isfy any  of the requirements of para-
graphs (c) (1) and (2) of this section the
Director may modify  the permit under
§144.39,   terminate  under §144.40,  or
                                      644

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.37
take enforcement action. If the Direc-
tor determines that cumulative effects
are unacceptable, the permit  may be
modified under §144.39.

§ 144.34  Emergency permits.
  (a)  Coverage.  Notwithstanding  any
other provision of this part or part 124,
the Director may temporarily permit a
specific underground injection if:
  (1)  An imminent and  substantial
endangerment to the health of persons
will result  unless  a temporary  emer-
gency permit is granted; or
  (2) A  substantial  and irretrievable
loss of oil or  gas resources will occur
unless a temporary emergency permit
is granted to a Class II well; and
  (i) Timely application for a  permit
could not practicably have  been made;
and
  (ii) The injection will  not result in
the  movement  of fluids  into  under-
ground sources of drinking water; or
  (3) A substantial delay in production
of oil or gas resources will occur unless
a  temporary  emergency  permit  is
granted to a new Class II well and the
temporary authorization will  not re-
sult in the movement of fluids into an
underground source of drinking water.
  (b) Requirements for issuance. (1) Any
temporary  permit  under  paragraph
(a)(l) of this  section shall be  for  no
longer term than required to  prevent
the hazard.
  (2)  Any  temporary   permit  under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be
for  no  longer than 90 days,  except that
if a permit application  has been sub-
mitted prior to the expiration of the 90-
day period, the Director may  extend
the temporary permit until final action
on the application.
  (3)  Any  temporary   permit  under
paragraph (a)(3) of this section shall be
issued  only after a complete permit ap-
plication has been submitted and shall
be  effective until final  action  on  the
application.
  (4) Notice of any temporary  permit
under this paragraph shall be published
in accordance  with  §124.11 within 10
days of the issuance of the permit.
  (5) The temporary permit under this
section may be  either oral  or written.
If oral, it  must be followed  within 5
calendar days by a  written temporary
emergency permit.
  (6) The  Director shall condition the
temporary permit in any manner he or
she determines is necessary to ensure
that the injection will not result in the
movement of  fluids into  an  under-
ground source of drinking water.
[48 FR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
FR 20185, May 11, 1984]

§ 144.35  Effect of a permit.
  (a) Except for Class II and III wells,
compliance  with a permit during its
term constitutes compliance, for pur-
poses of enforcement, with Part  C of
the SDWA. However,  a  permit may be
modified,  revoked and reissued, or ter-
minated during its term for  cause as
set forth in §§144.39 and 144.40.
  (b) The issuance of a permit does not
convey any property rights of any sort,
or any exclusive privilege.
  (c) The issuance of a permit does not
authorize any injury  to  persons  or
property or invasion of other private
rights, or any infringement of State or
local law or regulations.

§ 144.36  Duration of permits.
  (a) Permits for Class I and  Class V
wells shall be effective for a fixed term
not to exceed 10 years. UIC permits for
Class II and III wells shall be issued for
a period up to the operating life of the
facility. The Director shall review each
issued Class II or III well UIC permit at
least once every 5 years to determine
whether it should be modified,  revoked
and  reissued, terminated,  or a minor
modification  made   as provided  in
§§144.39, 144.40, and 144.41.
  (b) Except as provided in §144.37, the
term of a permit shall not  be extended
by modification beyond the maximum
duration specified in this section.
  (c) The  Director may issue any per-
mit for  a duration that is less than the
full allowable term under this  section.

§ 144.37  Continuation of expiring per-
   mits.
  (a) EPA permits. When EPA is the per-
mit-issuing  authority,  the conditions
of an expired permit  continue  in force
under 5  U.S.C. 558(c) until the effective
date of a new permit if:
  (1) The  permittee  has submitted a
timely application which is a complete
application for a new permit; and
                                     645

-------
§144.38
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (2)  The  Regional   Administrator,
through no fault of the permittee does
not issue a new permit with an effec-
tive date on or before the  expiration
date of the previous permit  (for exam-
ple, when issuance is impracticable due
to time or resource constraints).
  (b)  Effect. Permits continued under
this section remain fully effective and
enforceable.
  (c) Enforcement.  When the permittee
is not in compliance  with the condi-
tions  of the expiring or expired permit
the   Regional   Administrator   may
choose to do any or all of the following:
  (1) Initiate enforcement action based
upon the permit which has been contin-
ued;
  (2) Issue a notice  of intent  to  deny
the new permit. If the permit is denied,
the owner or operator would  then be
required  to cease the activities author-
ized by the continued permit or be sub-
ject to enforcement  action for oper-
ating without a permit;
  (3) Issue a new permit under part 124
with appropriate conditions; or
  (4) Take other actions authorized by
these regulations.
  (d) State continuation. An EPA issued
permit does not continue  in force be-
yond  its  time expiration date under
Federal law if  at that time  a  State is
the permitting authority.  A State au-
thorized  to administer the UIC  pro-
gram  may  continue  either EPA  or
State-issued permits until the effective
date of the new permits, if State law
allows. Otherwise, the facility or activ-
ity is operating without a permit  from
the time of expiration of the  old permit
to the effective date of the State-issued
new permit.

§ 144.38  Transfer of permits.
  (a)  Transfers  by modification. Except
as provided in paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion,  a permit may be transferred by
the permittee to  a new owner  or oper-
ator only if the permit has been modi-
fied or revoked  and  reissued (under
§144.39(b)(2)), or a minor modification
made (under §144.41(d)), to identify the
new permittee and incorporate  such
other  requirements as may  be  nec-
essary under the Safe Drinking Water
Act.
  (b)  Automatic transfers. As an alter-
native to transfers under paragraph (a)
of this section,  any UIC permit for a
well not injecting hazardous waste may
be automatically transferred to a new
permittee if:
  (1) The current permittee notifies the
Director  at least 30 days in advance of
the proposed transfer  date referred to
in paragraph (b)(2) of this section;
  (2)  The notice  includes  a  written
agreement between  the  existing and
new permittees  containing a  specific
date for  transfer  or  permit responsi-
bility, coverage, and liability between
them,  and  the notice  demonstrates
that  the  financial  responsibility re-
quirements of §144.52(a)(7) will be met
by the new permittee; and
  (3) The  Director does not notify the
existing  permittee and  the proposed
new permittee of his or her int.ent to
modify or revoke and  reissue the per-
mit. A modification under this  para-
graph may also be a minor modifica-
tion under §144.41. If this notice is not
received,  the transfer is effective  on
the date  specified in the  agreement
mentioned in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section.

§ 144.39  Modification  or   revocation
    and reisssuance of permits.
  When the Director receives anj infor-
mation (for example, inspects the facil-
ity, receives information submitted by
the permittee as required in the permit
(see §144.51 of this chapter), receives a
request for modification or revocation
and reissuance  under §124.5,  or  con-
ducts a review of the permit file) he or
she may  determine whether or not one
or more  of the  causes listed in  para-
graphs (a) and (b) of  this section for
modification    or   revocation   and
reissuance or both exist. If cause ex-
ists, the  Director may  modify or re-
voke  and reissue  the permit  accord-
ingly,  subject  to  the  limitations  of
paragraph (c) of this section, and may
request an updated application if nec-
essary. When a permit is  modified, only
the conditions subject to modification
are reopened.  If a permit is  revoked
and reissued, the entire permit is re-
opened and subject to revision and the
permit is reissued for a new term. See
§124.5(c)(2) of this chapter.  If  cause
does not  exist under  this  sect.on  or
§144.41 of this  chapter,  the  Director
shall not  modify or revoke and reissue
                                    646

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §144.39
the  permit.  If a  permit modification
satisfies  the criteria in  §144.41  for
"minor modifications" the permit may
be modified  without a draft permit or
public review. Otherwise, a draft per-
mit  must be prepared and other proce-
dures in part 124 must be followed.
  (a) Causes for modification. The fol-
lowing- are causes for modification. For
Class I hazardous waste injection wells,
Class II, or Class III wells the following
may be  causes  for  revocation  and
reissuance as well as modification; and
for all other wells the following may be
cause  for  revocation  or  reissuance as
well  as modification  when  the per-
mittee requests or agrees.
  (1) Alterations. There are material and
substantial alterations or additions to
the  permitted  facility   or  activity
which occurred after permit issuance
which justify the application of permit
conditions that are different  or absent
in the existing permit.
  (2) Information. The Director  has  re-
ceived information. Permits other than
for Class II and III wells may be modi-
fied  during their terms for this cause
only if the information was not avail-
able at the time  of permit issuance
(other than  revised regulations, guid-
ance, or test methods) and would have
justified the application  of different
permit conditions  at  the  time  of
issuance.   For   UIC  area   permits
(§144.33), this cause shall include any
information   indicating  that  cumu-
lative  effects on the  environment are
unacceptable.
  (3) New  regulations. The standards or
regulations on which the  permit was
based have been changed  by promulga-
tion of new or  amended  standards or
regulations  or  by  judicial decision
after the  permit  was issued.  Permits
other than for Class I hazardous waste
injection  wells, Class II,  or  Class  III
wells  may  be modified  during their
terms for this cause only as follows:
  (i)  For  promulgation  of  amended
standards or regulations, when:
  (A) The  permit condition requested
to be modified was based  on a promul-
gated part 146 regulation; and
  (B) EPA has revised, withdrawn,  or
modified that portion  of the regulation
on  which  the permit condition was
based,  and
  (C) A  permittee requests modifica-
tion in accordance with §124.5 within
ninety (90) days  after FEDERAL  REG-
ISTER notice of the action on which the
request is based.
  (ii) For judicial decisions, a  court of
competent  jurisdiction  has remanded
and  stayed EPA  promulgated  regula-
tions if the remand and stay  concern
that  portion  of  the regulations  on
which the permit condition was based
and  a request is filed by the permittee
in accordance with §124.5 within ninety
(90) days of judicial remand.
  (4) Compliance schedules. The Director
determines good cause exists for modi-
fication of a compliance  schedule, such
as an act of God, strike, flood, or mate-
rials shortage or other  events  over
which the permittee has  little or  no
control and for which there is  no rea-
sonably  available remedy. See  also
§144.41(c) (minor modifications).
  (b) Causes for modification or revoca-
tion  and reissuance. The following are
causes to modify  or,  alternatively, re-
voke and reissue a permit:
  (1)  Cause  exists  for  termination
under  §144.40, and the Director deter-
mines that modification or revocation
and reissuance is appropriate.
  (2) The  Director has received notifi-
cation (as required in the permit, see
§ 144.41(d)) of a proposed transfer of the
permit. A permit also may be modified
to reflect a transfer after the effective
date   of   an   automatic   transfer
(§ 144.38(b)) but will not be revoked and
reissued after the effective date of the
transfer except upon the request of the
new  permittee.
  (3) A determination that  the waste
being injected is a hazardous waste as
defined in §261.3 either because the def-
inition has been  revised, or because a
previous    determination   has   been
changed.
  (c) Facility siting. Suitability of the
facility location will not be considered
at the time of permit modification or
revocation and reissuance  unless new
information or standards indicate that
a threat  to human health or the  envi-
ronment exists which was unknown at
the time of permit issuance.

[48 FR 14189, Apr.  1, 1983, as amended at 53
FR 28147, July 26,1988]
                                     647

-------
§144.40
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 144.40 Termination of permits.
  (a)  The Director  may terminate  a
permit during its term, or deny a per-
mit  renewal application for the fol-
lowing causes:
  (1) Noncompliance by  the  permittee
with any condition of the permit;
  (2) The permittee's failure  in the ap-
plication or during the permit issuance
process to disclose  fully all relevant
facts, or the permittee's misrepresenta-
tion of any relevant facts at any time;
or
  (3)  A determination that  the per-
mitted   activity   endangers  human
health or  the environment  and can
only be regulated to acceptable  levels
by permit modification or termination;
  (b)  The  Director shall follow  the
applicable  procedures  in part  124  in
terminating any permit under this sec-
tion.

§ 144.41  Minor modifications of per-
   mits.
  Upon the  consent of the permittee,
the Director may modify a  permit to
make the corrections or allowances for
changes in the permitted activity list-
ed in this section,  without following
the procedures of part 124. Any permit
modification not processed as a minor
modification under  this section must
be made for cause and  with part 124
draft permit and public notice as re-
quired in §144.39. Minor modifications
may only:
  (a) Correct typographical errors;
  (b) Require more frequent monitoring
or reporting by the permittee;
  (c)  Change  an  interim compliance
date in a schedule  of compliance, pro-
vided the new date is not more than 120
days after the date specified in the ex-
isting permit and  does not interfere
with  attainment of the final compli-
ance date requirement; or
  (d)  Allow  for a change in  ownership
or  operational  control  of  a  facility
where the Director determines that no
other  change in  the  permit is nec-
essary, provided that a written agree-
ment containing  a specific  date  for
transfer  of permit  responsibility, cov-
erage, and liability between the cur-
rent and new permittees has been sub-
mitted to the Director.
  (e)  Change  quantities or  types  of
fluids injected which are within the ca-
pacity of the facility as permitted and,
in the judgment of the Director, would
not interfere with the operation of the
facility or its  ability to meet condi-
tions described in the permit and would
not change its classification.
  (f) Change construction requirements
approved by  the  Director pursuant to
§144.52(a)(l) (establishing UIC permit
conditions), provided that any such al-
teration shall comply with the require-
ments of this part and part 146.
  (g) Amend  a plugging and abandon-
ment  plan  which  has  been updated
under §144.52(a)(6).

   Subpart E—Permit Conditions

§ 144.51 Conditions  applicable  to all
    permits.
  The following conditions apply to all
UIC permits. All conditions applicable
to  all permits  shall be incorporated
into the permits either expressly or by
reference. If incorporated by reference,
a specific  citation to these regulations
(or the corresponding approved  State
regulations) must be given  in the per-
mit.
  (a)  Duty to  comply.  The  permittee
must comply with all conditions of this
permit.  Any  permit  noncompliance
constitutes  a  violation  of the  Safe
Drinking Water Act and is grounds for
enforcement  action; for  permit termi-
nation, revocation and  reissuance, or
modification; or for denial of a permit
renewal application;  except  that  the
permittee need not comply with  the
provisions of this permit to the extent
and for the duration such  noncompli-
ance  is authorized  in  an  emergency
permit under § 144.34.
  (b) Duty to reapply. If the permittee
wishes to  continue  an  activity regu-
lated by this permit after  the expira-
tion date  of this permit, the permittee
must  apply  for  and  obtain a  new
permit.
  (c) Need to halt or reduce activity not a
defense. It shall not be  a defense for a
permittee  in an  enforcement  action
that it would have been necessary to
halt or reduce the permitted activity
in order to maintain compliance with
the conditions of this permit.
  (d)  Duty to mitigate.  The permittee
shall take all reasonable steps to mini-
mize or correct any adverse impact on
                                     648

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.51
the  environment  resulting from non-
compliance with this permit.
  (e) Proper operation and maintenance.
The permittee shall at all times prop-
erly operate and maintain all facilities
and systems of treatment and control
(and related appurtenances) which are
installed  or used  by the permittee to
achieve compliance with the conditions
of this permit. Proper  operation  and
maintenance  includes  effective  per-
formance, adequate funding,  adequate
operator staffing and training, and ade-
quate laboratory and process controls,
including  appropriate  quality  assur-
ance  procedures.  This  provision  re-
quires the operation of back-up or aux-
iliary facilities or similar systems only
when necessary to achieve  compliance
with the conditions of the permit.
  (f) Permit actions. This permit may be
modified,  revoked and reissued,  or  ter-
minated for cause. The  filing of a re-
quest  by  the permittee for  a  permit
modification,  revocation  and  reissu-
ance, or termination, or a notification
of planned changes or  anticipated non-
compliance, does not stay any  permit
condition.
  (g) Property rights. This permit does
not convey any property rights of  any
sort, or any exclusive privilege.
  (h) Duty to provide  information. The
permittee shall furnish to the Director,
within a  time specified, any informa-
tion which the Director may request to
determine whether cause  exists  for
modifying, revoking and reissuing, or
terminating this permit, or  to deter-
mine compliance with  this permit. The
permittee shall  also furnish to the Di-
rector, upon request, copies of records
required to be kept by this permit.
  (i) Inspection  and  entry.  The  per-
mittee shall allow the Director, or an
authorized  representative,  upon  the
presentation of credentials and other
documents as may be required by law,
to:
  (1) Enter upon the permittee's prem-
ises where a regulated facility or activ-
ity is  located or conducted,  or where
records must be kept under the condi-
tions of this permit;
  (2) Have access to and copy, at rea-
sonable times, any records that must
be kept under the conditions of this
permit;
  (3) Inspect at reasonable times  any
facilities, equipment (including moni-
toring and  control  equipment),  prac-
tices,  or  operations regulated or re-
quired under this permit; and
  (4) Sample or monitor at reasonable
times, for the purposes of assuring per-
mit compliance or as otherwise author-
ized by the SDWA,  any substances or
parameters at any location.
  (j) Monitoring and records. (1) Samples
and measurements taken  for the pur-
pose of monitoring shall be representa-
tive of the monitored activity.
  (2) The permittee shall retain records
of all monitoring  information, includ-
ing the following:
  (i)  Calibration    and   maintenance
records and all original strip chart re-
cordings for continuous monitoring in-
strumentation, copies of all reports re-
quired by this permit, and records of
all  data used to complete  the applica-
tion for this permit, for a period of at
least 3 years from  the date of the sam-
ple, measurement, report, or applica-
tion. This period may be  extended by
request of the Director at any  time;
and
  (ii) The nature and composition of all
injected fluids until three years after
the  completion of  any plugging and
abandonment    procedures  specified
under  §144.52(a)(6),  or under  part  146
subpart G as appropriate.  The Director
may require the owner or operator to
deliver the records  to the Director at
the conclusion of the retention period.
For EPA  administered programs,  the
owner or operator  shall continue to re-
tain the records after the three year re-
tention period unless he  delivers  the
records to the Regional Administrator
or obtains written approval from  the
Regional Administrator to discard  the
records.
  (3) Records  of monitoring informa-
tion shall include:
  (i) The date, exact place, and time of
sampling or measurements;
  (ii) The individual(s) who performed
the sampling or measurements;
  (iii) The date(s) analyses were  per-
formed;
  (iv) The individual(s) who performed
the analyses;
  (v)  The  analytical  techniques   or
methods used;  and
  (vi) The results of such analyses.
                                    649

-------
§144.51
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (k) Signatory requirement. All applica-
tions,  reports,  or  information  sub-
mitted to the Administrator shall be
signed and certified. (See §144.32.)
  (1) Reporting requirements. (1) Planned
changes.  The permittee shall give no-
tice to the Director as soon as possible
of any planned physical alterations or
additions to the permitted facility.
  (2)  Anticipated  noncompliance.  The
permittee shall give advance notice to
the Director of any planned changes in
the  permitted  facility  or  activity
which  may result in noncompliance
with permit requirements.
  (3)  Transfers.  This  permit  is not
transferable to any person except after
notice to the Director.  The Director
may require modification or revocation
and reissuance of the permit  to change
the name of the permittee and incor-
porate such  other requirements as may
be necessary under the Safe Drinking
Water Act. (See  §144.38; in some cases,
modification   or   revocation   and
reissuance is mandatory.)
  (4) Monitoring reports. Monitoring re-
sults shall be reported at the intervals
specified elsewhere  in this permit.
  (5) Compliance schedules. Reports  of
compliance  or noncompliance with, or
any progress reports on, interim and
final  requirements  contained  in any
compliance  schedule  of  this permit
shall  be submitted no later than  30
days following each schedule date.
  (6)  Twenty-four  hour reporting.  The
permittee shall report any noncompli-
ance which may  endanger health or the
environment, including:
  (i) Any monitoring or other informa-
tion which indicates that any contami-
nant may cause an endangerment to  a
USDW; or
  (ii) Any noncompliance with a permit
condition or malfunction of  the injec-
tion system which may cause fluid mi-
gration into or between TJSDWs.
Any information shall be provided oral-
ly within 24 hours from the time the
permittee becomes  aware of the cir-
cumstances.   A  written  submission
shall also be provided  within 5 days of
the time the permittee becomes aware
of the circumstances. The written sub-
mission  shall contain  a  description of
the noncompliance and its cause, the
period  of  noncompliance,  including
exact dates and times, and if the non-
compliance has not been corrected, the
anticipated time it is expected to con-
tinue; and steps taken or planned to re-
duce, eliminate, and prevent reoccur-
rence of the noncompliance.
  (7)  Other  noncompliance.  The  per-
mittee shall report  all  instances  of
noncompliance   not  reported   under
paragraphs (1)  (4),  (5), and (6) of this
section, at the time monitoring reports
are submitted.  The reports shall con-
tain the  information  listed  in  para-
graph (1)(6) of this section.
  (8) Other information. Where the per-
mittee becomes aware that it failed to
submit any relevant facts in  a permit
application, or  submitted incorrect in-
formation in  a permit application or in
any  report  to  the  Director, it shall
promptly submit such facts or informa-
tion.
  (m) Requirements  prior  to commencing
injection. Except for all  new wells au-
thorized  by  an  area   permit   under
§144.33(c), a new injection well may not
commence injection until construction
is complete, and
  (1) The permittee has  submitted no-
tice  of completion of construction to
the Director; and
  (2)(i) The  Director has inspected or
otherwise reviewed the  new  injection
well and finds it is in compliance with
the conditions of the permit; or
  (ii) The permittee has not received
notice  form the Director of his or her
intent  to inspect or otherwise  review
the new injection well within 13 days of
the  date  of  the  notice in paragraph
(m)(l)  of  this  section,  in which case
prior inspection  or review is waived
and  the permittee  may  commence in-
jection. The  Director shall include in
his notice a  reasonable time period in
which he shall inspect the well.
  (n) The permittee shall notify the Di-
rector  at such  times as  the permit re-
quires  before conversion  or  abandon-
ment of the well or in the case of area
permits before closure of the project.
  (o) A Class  I,  II or III permit shall in-
clude and  a  Class  V permit may in-
clude, conditions which meet the appli-
cable requirements of  §146.10 of this
chapter to insure  that plugging  and
abandonment of the well will not allow
the movement of fluids into or between
USDWs. Where the plan meets the re-
quirements of  §146.10 of this chapter,
                                    650

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.52
the Director shall incorporate  it into
the  permit  as  a  permit  condition.
Where the Director's review of an ap-
plication indicates that the permittee's
plan is inadequate, the Director may
require the  applicant to  revise  the
plan,  prescribe conditions meeting the
requirements  of  this  paragraph,  or
deny  the  permit.  For purposes  of this
paragraph, temporary or intermittent
cessation  of injection operations is not
abandonment.
  (p) Plugging and abandonment report.
For EPA-administered programs, with-
in 60  days after plugging a well or at
the time  of the next quarterly report
(whichever is  less) the owner or oper-
ator shall submit a report to the  Re-
gional Administrator. If the quarterly
report is  due  less than 15 days before
completion of plugging, then the report
shall be submitted within 60 days. The
report shall be certified as accurate by
the person who performed the plugging
operation. Such report shall consist of
either:
  (1) A statement that the well was
plugged in  accordance with  the plan
previously submitted  to  the Regional
Administrator; or
  (2)  Where  actual plugging  differed
from  the   plan  previously submitted,
and updated version of the plan on the
form supplied by the regional adminis-
trator, specifying the differences.
  (q) Duty to establish and maintain me-
chanical integrity.  (1) The owner or op-
erator of  a Class  I, II or III well per-
mitted under  this part shall establish
prior  to commencing injection or on a
schedule determined by the Director,
and thereafter maintain mechanical in-
tegrity as defined in § 146.8 of this chap-
ter. For EPA-administered  programs,
the Regional  Administrator may re-
quire  by written notice that the owner
or operator comply with a schedule de-
scribing   when  mechanical  integrity
demonstrations shall be made.
  (2)  When the  Director determines
that a Class I, II,  or III well lacks me-
chanical integrity pursuant to §146.8 of
this chapter, he shall give written no-
tice of his determination to  the owner
or operator. Unless  the Director re-
quires immediate  cessation,  the owner
or operator shall  cease  injection into
the well within 48 hours of  receipt of
the Director's determination. The Di-
rector may allow plugging of the well
pursuant to the requirements of §146.10
of this chapter or require the permittee
to perform such  additional construc-
tion,  operation, monitoring, reporting
and corrective action as is necessary to
prevent the movement of fluid into or
between USDWs caused by the lack of
mechanical integrity. The  owner or op-
erator may resume injection upon writ-
ten notification from the Director that
the   owner  or  operator  has  dem-
onstrated mechanical integrity pursu-
ant to § 146.8 of this chapter.
  (3) The Director may allow the owner
or operator of a  well  which lacks me-
chanical    integrity   pursuant   to
§146.8(a)(l) of this chapter to continue
or resume injection, if the  owner or op-
erator has  made  a satisfactory dem-
onstration that there is no movement
of fluid into or between USDWs.
[48 FR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
FR 20185, May 11, 1984; 53 FR  28147, July 26,
1988; 58 FR 63898, Dec. 3, 1993]

§ 144.52 Establishing   permit   condi-
   tions.
  (a) In addition to conditions required
in §144.51,  the Director shall establish
conditions,  as required on a case-by-
case  basis under §144.36 (duration  of
permits),  §144.53(a) (schedules of com-
pliance), §144.54 (monitoring), and for
EPA permits  only §144.53(b) (alternate
schedules  of  compliance),  and  §144.4
(considerations  under  Federal  law).
Permits for owners or operators  of haz-
ardous waste  injection wells shall in-
clude conditions  meeting  the require-
ments of §144.14 (requirements for wells
injecting   hazardous  waste),   §144.52
(a)(7) and (a)(9), and subpart G of part
146. Permits for other wells shall con-
tain the following requirements, when
applicable.
  (1)  Construction requirements  as  set
forth in part  146. Existing wells shall
achieve compliance with such require-
ments  according  to  a   compliance
schedule established as a permit condi-
tion.  The  owner  or operator of a pro-
posed new injection well shall submit
plans  for  testing, drilling, and con-
struction as part  of the permit applica-
tion.  Except as authorized by an area
permit, no constuction may commence
until  a permit has been  issued con-
taining construction requirements (see
                                    651

-------
§144.52
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§144.11). New wells shall be in compli-
ance with these requirements prior to
commencing   injection   operations.
Changes  in  construction  plans  during
construction may be approved  by the
Administrator  as  minor modifications
(§144.41). No such changes may be phys-
ically  incorporated into  construction
of the well prior  to approval  of the
modification by the Director.
  (2) Corrective action  as set forth in
§§144.55 and  146.7
  (3) Operation  requirements as set forth
in 40 CFR part 146; the permit shall es-
tablish any maximum injection  vol-
umes and/or pressures necessary to as-
sure that fractures are not initiated in
the confining zone, that injected fluids
do not migrate into any underground
source of drinking water, that  forma-
tion fluids are not displaced into  any
underground source of drinking water,
and to assure compliance  with the part
146 operating requirements.
  (4) Requirements  for wells  managing
hazardous waste, as set forth  in §144.14.
  (5) Monitoring and reporting require-
ments  as set forth in 40 CFR part 146.
The  permittee  shall  be  required to
identify  types of  tests  and methods
used to generate the monitoring data.
For EPA administered programs, moni-
toring of the nature of injected fluids
shall comply with applicable  analytical
methods cited and described in  table I
of 40 CFR 136.3 or in appendix III of 40
CFR   part  261  or  in   certain   cir-
cumstances  by  other  methods  that
have been approved by  the Regional
Administrator.
  (6) After a cessation of operations of
two years the  owner or operator shall
plug and abandon  the well in accord-
ance with the plan unless he:
  (i) Provides  notice to  the Regional
Administrator;
  (ii) Describes actions or procedures,
satisfactory to the Regional Adminis-
trator, that the owner or operator  will
take to ensure that the  well will not
endanger USDWs during  the period of
temporary abandonment. These actions
and  procedures shall  include  compli-
ance with the technical  requirements
applicable to active injection wells un-
less waived  by the Regional Adminis-
trator.
  (7) Financial responsibility, (i) The  per-
mittee, including the transferor of a
permit, is required to demonstrate and
maintain  financial responsibility and
resources  to close, plug,  and abandon
the underground injection operation in
a manner prescribed by  the Director
until:
  (A)  The well has  been plugged and
abandoned in accordance with  an ap-
proved plugging and abandonment plan
pursuant to  §§144.51(o) and 146.10 of this
chapter, and submitted a plugging and
abandonment  report   pursuant   to
§144.51(p); or
  (B)  The well has been  converted in
compliance  with the requirements of
§144.51(n); or
  (C) The transferor of a permit  has re-
ceived notice from the Director that
the owner or operator receiving trans-
fer  of the permit, the  new permittee,
has demonstrated  financial responsi-
bility for the well.
  (ii)  The  permittee shall  show evi-
dence  of such  financial responsibility
to the Director by the submission of a
surety bond, or other adequate assur-
ance,  such as a financial  statement or
other materials acceptable to the Di-
rector.  For EPA  administered  pro-
grams,  the  Regional  Administrator
may  on a periodic  basis require  the
holder of  a  lifetime permit  to  submit
an estimate of the resources needed to
plug and abandon the  well revised to
reflect inflation of such costs, arid a re-
vised  demonstration of  financial re-
sponsibility, if necessary. The owner or
operator of  a well injecting  hazardous
waste must comply with  the financial
responsibility requirements of subpart
F of this part.
  (8) Mechanical integrity.  A permit for
any Class I, II or in well or injection
project which lacks mechanical integ-
rity shall include, and for any Class V
well may include, a condition prohib-
iting injection operations until the per-
mittee shows to the satisfaction of the
Director under § 146.08 that the well has
mechanical integrity.
  (9) Additional conditions. The Director
shall  impose  on  a case-by-case basis
such additional conditions as are nec-
essary  to  prevent the migration  of
fluids  into   underground sources  of
drinking water.
  (b)(l) In addition to conditions re-
quired in all permits the Director shall
                                     652

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.53
establish  conditions in permits  as re-
quired on a case-by-case basis, to pro-
vide for and assure compliance with all
applicable requirements of the SDWA
and parts  144, 145, 146 and 124.
  (2) For a State issued permit, an ap-
plicable requirement  is a  State  statu-
tory or regulatory requirement  which
takes effect prior to  final administra-
tive disposition of the permit.  For  a
permit issued by EPA, an applicable re-
quirement is a statutory or regulatory
requirement  (including  any  interim
final regulation)  which  takes  effect
prior to  the issuance of  the permit.
Section 124.14  (reopening  of  comment
period) provides a means for reopening
EPA permit proceedings at the discre-
tion of the Director where  new require-
ments become effective during the per-
mitting process and  are of sufficient
magnitude to  make  additional pro-
ceedings desirable. For State and EPA
administered programs, an  applicable
requirement  is  also  any  requirement
which takes  effect prior  to  the  modi-
fication or revocation and reissuance of
a  permit, to  the extent allowed in
§144.39.
  (3) New or reissued permits,  and to
the extent allowed under §144.39 modi-
fied  or  revoked and  reissued permits,
shall incorporate each of the applicable
requirements referenced in § 144.52.
  (c)  Incorporation. All permit  condi-
tions shall be  incorporated  either ex-
pressly or by reference. If incorporated
by reference, a specific citation to the
applicable regulations or requirements
must be given in the permit.
[48 FR 14189, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 49
FR 20185, May 11, 1984; 53 FR  28147, July 26,
1988;  58 FR 63898; Deo. 3, 1993; 65 FR 30913,
May 15, 2000]

§ 144.53  Schedule  of compliance.
  (a)  General.  The permit may, when
appropriate, specify a  schedule of com-
pliance leading to  compliance with the
SDWA and parts 144, 145, 146, and 124.
  (1) Time for compliance. Any schedules
of compliance shall require compliance
as soon as possible, and in no case later
than 3 years after the effective date of
the permit.
  (2) Interim dates. Except as provided
in paragraph (b)(l)(ii) of this section, if
a permit establishes a schedule of com-
pliance  which exceeds 1 year from the
date of permit issuance, the schedule
shall  set forth  interim  requirements
and the dates for their achievement.
  (i) The time between interim dates
shall not exceed 1 year.
  (ii) If the time necessary for comple-
tion of  any  interim  requirement is
more than 1 year and is not readily di-
visible into  stages for completion, the
permit shall specify interim dates for
the submission of reports of progress
toward  completion of the interim re-
quirements  and  indicate  a projected
completion date.
  (3) Reporting.  The  permit  shall  be
written  to  require that if paragraph
(a)(l)  of this section  is  applicable,
progress reports be submitted no later
than 30  days following each  interim
date and the final date of compliance.
  (b) Alternative schedules of compliance.
A permit applicant or permittee  may
cease conducting  regulated activities
(by plugging and abandonment) rather
than continue to operate and meet per-
mit requirements as follows:
  (1) If the permittee  decides to cease
conducting  regulated  activities at  a
given time within the term of a permit
which has already been issued:
  (i) The permit may  be  modified to
contain a new or additional  schedule
leading  to timely cessation of activi-
ties; or
  (ii) The permittee  shall  cease  con-
ducting  permitted  activities  before
noncompliance with  any interim  or
final compliance schedule requirement
already specified in the permit.
  (2) If the decision to cease conducting
regulated activities  is  made  before
issuance of  a permit whose  term will
include  the  termination date, the per-
mit shall contain a schedule leading to
termination which will ensure  timely
compliance  with  applicable  require-
ments.
  (3) If  the  permittee is undecided
whether  to cease conducting regulated
activities, the Director may issue or
modify a permit to contain two sched-
ules as follows:
  (i) Both schedules  shall contain  an
identical interim deadline requiring a
final decision  on whether to cease con-
ducting  regulated activities  no later
than a  date which ensures  sufficient
time to comply with applicable  re-
quirements in a timely manner if the
                                     653

-------
§144.54
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
decision is to continue conducting reg-
ulated activities;
  (ii) One schedule shall lead to timely
compliance  with applicable  require-
ments;
  (iii) The second schedule shall lead to
cessation of regulated activities by a
date which will ensure timely compli-
ance with applicable requirements;
  (iv)  Each permit  containing  two
schedules shall  include  a requirement
that after the permittee has made a
final decision under paragraph (b)(3)(i)
of this section it shall follow the sched-
ule leading to  compliance if the deci-
sion is to continue  conducting  regu-
lated activities, and follow the  sched-
ule leading to termination if the deci-
sion is to cease conducting regulated
activities.
  (4) The  applicant's  or permittee's de-
cision  to cease  conducting regulated
activities shall be evidenced by  a firm
public commitment satisfactory to the
Director,  such as a  resolution  of the
board of directors of a corporation.

§ 144.54 Requirements  for  recording
    and reporting of monitoring results.
  All permits shall specify:
  (a)   Requirements   concerning  the
proper use, maintenance, and installa-
tion, when  appropriate, of monitoring
equipment or methods (including bio-
logical  monitoring methods when ap-
propriate);
  (b)  Required  monitoring  including
type,  intervals,  and  frequency  suffi-
cient to yield data which are represent-
ative of the monitored activity includ-
ing when  appropriate, continuous mon-
itoring;
  (c) Applicable reporting requirements
based upon the impact of the regulated
activity and as  specified in  part 146.
Reporting shall  be  no  less frequent
than specified in the above regulations.

§ 144.55  Corrective action.
  (a) Coverage. Applicants for Class I,
II,  (other than  existing),  or  III injec-
tion well  permits shall identify the lo-
cation of all known wells within the in-
jection well's area of review which pen-
etrate the injection zone, or in the case
of  Class  II  wells operating  over the
fracture pressure  of  the  injection for-
mation,  all  known  wells within the
area of review penetrating formations
affected  by the  increase  in  pressure.
For  such wells which  are improperly
sealed, completed, or  abandoned, the
applicant shall also submit a  plan con-
sisting of such steps or modifications
as are necessary  to prevent movement
of fluid  into  underground sources  of
drinking  water  ("corrective  action").
Where the plan is adequate, the Direc-
tor shall incorporate it into the permit
as a  condition. Where the Director's re-
view of  an  application indicates that
the  permittee's   plan  is  inadequate
(based on the factors in § 146.07), the Di-
rector shall require the applicant to re-
vise  the  plan, prescribe a plan for cor-
rective action as  a condition of the per-
mit under paragraph (b) of this section,
or deny  the application. The Director
may disregard the provisions  of § 146.06
(Area of Review) and  §146.07 (Correc-
tive   Action)  when   reviewing  an
application  to permit an existing  Class
II well.
  (b) Requirements—(1) Existing injection
wells. Any permit issued for an existing
injection well (other than Class II)  re-
quiring corrective action shall include
a compliance  schedule requiring any
corrective   action accepted   or  pre-
scribed under  paragraph (a) of this sec-
tion   to   be  completed  as  soon   as
possible.
  (2) New injection wells.  No  owner  or
operator of a new injection well may
begin injection until all required cor-
rective action has been taken.
  (3)  Injection  pressure limitation. The
Director  may require as a permit con-
dition that injection  pressure  be   so
limited that pressure  in the  injection
zone does not exceed hydrostatic pres-
sure  at the site of any improperly com-
pleted or abandoned  well  within the
area of review. This pressure limitation
shall satisfy the corrective action  re-
quirement.  Alternatively,  such injec-
tion  pressure limitation can be part of
a compliance schedule and last  until
all other required corrective action has
been taken.
  (4) Class III wells only. When setting
corrective action requirements the Di-
rector shall consider the overall effect
of the project on the hydraulic gra-
dient in potentially  affected USDWs,
and   the  corresponding  changes   in
                                     654

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.62
potentiometric surface(s) and flow  di-
rection(s) rather than the discrete  ef-
fect of each well. If a decision is made
that corrective action is not necessary
based on the determinations above, the
monitoring'   program   required   in
§146.33(b) shall  be designed  to verify
the validity of such determinations.

Subpart   F—Financial   Responsi-
     bility: Class I Hazardous Waste
     Injection Wells

  SOURCE: 49 FR 20186, May 11, 1984, unless
otherwise noted.

§144.60  Applicability.
  (a)  The  requirements  of   §§144.62,
144.63,  and 144.70 apply to owners and
operators of all existing and new Class
I Hazardous waste injection wells, ex-
cept as provided otherwise in this sec-
tion.

§ 144.61  Definitions of terms as used in
    this subpart.
  (a)  Plugging and  abandonment  plan
means the plan for plugging and aban-
donment prepared  in accordance  with
the requirements of §§144.28 and 144.51.
  (b)  Current  plugging  cost  estimate
means the most recent of the estimates
prepared in accordance with §144.62 (a),
(b) and (c).
  (c) Parent corporation  means a cor-
poration which directly owns at least
50 percent of the  voting stock of the
corporation which is the injection well
owner  or operator; the latter corpora-
tion is deemed a subsidiary of the par-
ent corporation.
  (d) The following  terms are used in
the specifications for the financial test
for  plugging  and  abandonment.  The
definitions  are intended to represent
the common meanings of the  terms as
they are generally used by the business
community.
  Assets  means  all  existing   and all
probable future  economic  benefits ob-
tained or controlled by a particular en-
tity.
  Current assets means cash or other as-
sets or  resources commonly identified
as those which are reasonably expected
to be realized in cash or sold or con-
sumed  during the  normal  operating
cycle of the business.
  Current liabilities means  obligations
whose liquidation is  reasonably  ex-
pected to require the use of existing re-
sources properly classifiable as current
assets or the creation of other current
liabilities.
  Independently  audited refers  to  an
audit performed by an independent  cer-
tified public accountant in accordance
with   generally   accepted  auditing
standards.
  Liabilities means probable future  sac-
rifices of  economic   benefits arising
from present obligations to transfer as-
sets or provide  services to other enti-
ties in the  future as  a result of past
transactions or events.
  Net working capital means current as-
sets minus current liabilities.
  Net worth means total assets minus
total  liabilities and  is equivalent to
owner's equity.
  Tangible net worth means the tangible
assets that  remain after deducting li-
abilities; such assets would not include
intangibles such as goodwill and rights
to patents or royalties.

§ 144.62  Cost estimate for plugging and
    abandonment.
  (a) The owner or operator must pre-
pare a written estimate, in current  dol-
lars, of the  cost of plugging the injec-
tion well in accordance with  the plug-
ging and abandonment plan as specified
in §§144.28 and 144.51. The plugging  and
abandonment cost estimate must equal
the cost  of plugging and abandonment
at the point in the facility's operating
life when the extent and manner of its
operation would making plugging  and
abandonment  the most expensive, as
indicated by its plugging and  abandon-
ment plan.
  (b) The owner or operator  must ad-
just the  plugging and abandonment
cost estimate for  inflation within 30
days after each anniversary of the date
on which the first plugging and aban-
donment cost estimate was prepared.
The adjustment must be made as speci-
fied in paragraphs (b) (1) and (2) of this
section,  using  an inflation factor de-
rived  from  the  annual Oil  and   Gas
Field Equipment Cost  Index. The infla-
tion factor is the result of  dividing the
latest  published annual Index by  the
Index for the previous year.
                                     655

-------
§144.63
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (1) The first adjustment is made by
multiplying the plugging and abandon-
ment cost estimate  by the inflation
factor. The result is the adjusted plug-
ging and abandonment cost estimate.
  (2) Subsequent adjustments are made
by  multiplying-  the latest adjusted
plugging and  abandonment cost esti-
mate by the latest inflation factor.
  (c) The owner or operator must revise
the plugging and abandonment cost es-
timate whenever a change in the plug-
ging and abandonment plan increases
the cost of plugging and abandonment.
The revised plugging and abandonment
cost estimate must be adjusted  for in-
flation as specified in §144.62(b).
  (d) The owner or operator must keep
the following at the facility during the
operating life of the facility: the latest
plugging and  abandonment cost esti-
mate  prepared  in  accordance with
§144.62  (a)  and  (c)  and,  when  this
estimate has been adjusted in  accord-
ance with § 144.62(b), the latest adjusted
plugging and  abandonment cost esti-
mate.

§ 144.63 Financial assurance for plug-
    ging and abandonment.
  An owner or operator  of each facility
must establish financial assurance for
the plugging and abandonment of each
existing  and  new  Class  I hazardous
waste  injection well. He  must  choose
from the options as specified in para-
graphs (a) through (f) of this section.
  (a)  Plugging and abandonment trust
fund. (1) An owner or operator may sat-
isfy the requirements of this section by
establishing a plugging and abandon-
ment trust fund which conforms to the
requirements  of  this  paragraph and
submitting an originally  signed dupli-
cate of the trust agreement to the Re-
gional Administrator. An owner or op-
erator of a Class I well injecting haz-
ardous waste  must  submit the  origi-
nally  signed  duplicate of the  trust
agreement to the  Regional Adminis-
trator with the permit application or
for approval to operate  under rule. The
trustee must be  an entity which has
the authority to  act as a trustee and
whose  trust  operations are regulated
and examined by a Federal or State
agency.
  (2) The wording of the trust agree-
ment must be identical to the wording
specified in §144.70(a)(l), and the trust
agreement must be accompanied by a
formal  certification  of  acknowledg-
ment (for  example, see §144.70(a)(2)).
Schedule  A  of  the trust  agreement
must be updated within 60 days after a
change in  the amount  of the current
plugging and abandonment cost esti-
mate covered by the agreement.
  (3) Payments  into the  trust fund
must be made annually by the owner or
operator over the term of  the  initial
permit or over the remaining operating
life of  the  injection well as estimated
in the plugging and abandonment plan,
whichever period is shorter;  this period
is hereafter referred to as the "pay-in
period." The payments  into the plug-
ging and abandonment trust fund must
be made as follows:
  (i) For a new well, the first payment
must be  made before the initial injec-
tion of hazardous waste. A receipt from
the trustee for this payment must be
submitted by the owner or operator to
the Regional Administrator before this
initial  injection  of hazardous  waste.
The first payment must be  at least
equal  to  the  current  plugging  and
abandonment cost estimate, except as
provided in §144.70(g), divided by the
number of years in the pay-in period.
Subsequent payments must be made no
later than 30 days after each anniver-
sary date  of the  first  payment.  The
amount  of each  subsequent payment
must be determined by this formula:
       Next payment =
                      PE-CV
where PE is the current plugging and aban-
donment cost estimate, CV is the current
value of the trust fund, and Y is the number
of years remaining in the pay-in period.

  (ii)  If  an owner  or operator  estab-
lishes  a  trust  fund as  specified  in
§ 144.63(a) of this chapter, and the value
of that trust fund is less than the cur-
rent plugging and  abandonment  cost
estimate when a permit is  awarded for
the injection well,  the  amount of the
current  plugging  and  abandonment
cost estimate still  to be paid into the
trust fund must be paid in over  the
pay-in period as defined in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section. Payments  must
continue to be made no later than 30
days after each anniversary date of the
                                    656

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.63
first payment made pursuant  to  part
144 of this chapter. The amount of each
payment must be determined  by this
formula:
       Next payment =
                      PE-CV
where PE is the current plugging and aban-
donment cost  estimate, CV  is the current
value of the trust fund, and Y is the number
of years remaining in the pay-in period.
  (4) The owner or operator may accel-
erate payments into the trust fund or
he may deposit the full amount of the
current  plugging  and  abandonment
cost estimate at the time the fund is
established. However,  he must  main-
tain the value of the fund at no less
than the value  that  the  fund  would
have if annual payments were made as
specified in paragraph (a)(3) of this sec-
tion.
  (5) If the owner or operator  estab-
lishes  a  plugging and  abandonment
trust fund after having  used one  or
more alternate  mechanisms  specified
in this section  or in  §144.63 of  this
chapter,  his first payment must be in
at least  the  amount  that  the  fund
would contain if the trust fund were es-
tablished initially  and  annual  pay-
ments made according to specifications
of this paragraph.
  (6) After the pay-in period is  com-
pleted, whenever the current plugging
and    abandonment    cost    estimate
changes, the owner  or operator  must
compare the  new estimate  with  the
trustee's most recent annual valuation
of the trust  fund. If the  value of  the
fund is less than the amount of the new
estimate, the owner or operator, within
60 days after the change in the cost es-
timate, must either deposit an amount
into the fund so that its value  after
this  deposit at least equals the amount
of the current plugging and abandon-
ment cost estimate, or obtain other fi-
nancial assurance as specified in  this
section to cover the difference.
  (7) If the value  of the trust fund is
greater than the total  amount of  the
current  plugging  and  abandonment
cost estimate, the owner  or  operator
may submit  a written  request to  the
Regional Administrator for release of
the  amount  in excess of the current
plugging and  abandonment cost esti-
mate.
  (8)  If  an  owner  or operator  sub-
stitutes  other financial assurance  as
specified in this section for all or part
of the trust  fund, he  may submit  a
written request to the Regional Admin-
istrator  for release  of  the  amount  in
excess of  the current  plugging and
abandonment cost estimate covered by
the trust fund.
  (9) Within 60 days after receiving  a
request from the  owner or operator for
release of  funds  as  specified in para-
graph (a) (7) or (8) of this section, the
Regional Administrator will instruct
the trustee to release  to the owner  or
operator such funds as the Regional
Administrator specifies in writing.
  (10) After  beginning  final plugging
and  abandonment, an owner or oper-
ator or any other person authorized  to
perform  plugging  and  abandonment
may request reimbursement for plug-
ging and abandonment expenditures by
submitting itemized bills  to the Re-
gional Administrator.  Within 60  days
after receiving bills for plugging and
abandonment activities, the Regional
Administrator will determine whether
the plugging and  abandonment expend-
itures are in accordance with the plug-
ging and abandonment plan or other-
wise justified, and if so,  he will in-
struct the  trustee to make  reimburse-
ment in such amounts as the Regional
Administrator specifies in  writing.  If
the Regional Administrator has  reason
to believe that the cost of plugging and
abandonment  will  be  significantly
greater than the value of  the trust
fund, he  may withhold  reimbursement
of such amounts  as  he deems prudent
until he  determines,  in  accordance
with §144.63(1), that the owner or oper-
ator is no  longer required to maintain
financial assurance  for plugging and
abandonment.
  (11) The Regional Administrator will
agree to termination of the trust when:
  (i) An  owner or operator substitutes
alternate financial assurance as speci-
fied in this section; or
  (ii) The  Regional Administrator re-
leases the  owner  or operator from the
requirements of this section in accord-
ance with §144.63(1).
  (b) Surety bond  guaranteeing payment
into  a  plugging and  abandonment  trust
fund. (1) An owner  or  operator must
satisfy the  requirements of this section
                                    657

-------
§144.63
         40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
by obtaining a surety bond which con-
forms to the requirements of this para-
graph and submitting the bond  to the
Regional Administrator with the appli-
cation for a permit or for approval to
operate under rule. The bond  must be
effective before the initial injection of
hazardous waste. The surety company
issuing the trust must,  at a minimum,
be among  those listed as  acceptable
sureties on  Federal bonds in  Circular
570  of  the  U.S. Department  of  the
Treasury.
  (2) The wording of the  surety bond
must  be identical to  the wording in
§144.70(b).
  (3) The owner or operator who uses a
surety  bond to  satisfy  the  require-
ments of this section must also estab-
lish a standby trust  fund.  Under the
terms of the bond, all payments made
thereunder will  be deposited  by  the
surety directly into the standby trust
fund in accordance with  instructions
from the Regional Administrator. This
standby trust  fund must  meet the re-
quirements  specified  in §144.63(a), ex-
cept that:
  (i) An originally signed duplicate of
the trust agreement must  be submitted
to the Regional Administrator with the
surety bond; and
  (ii)  Until  the  standby trust  fund is
funded pursuant  to the requirements of
this section, the following are not re-
quired by these requirements:
  (A)  Payments  into the trust fund as
specified in § 144.63(a);
  (B)  Updating  of Schedule A  of the
trust agreement  [see §144.70(a)] to show
current plugging  and  abandonment
cost estimates;
  (C) Annual valuations as required by
the trust agreement; and
  (D)  Notices of  nonpayment  as re-
quired by the trust agreement.
  (4) The bond must guarantee that the
owner or operator will:
  (i) Fund the standby trust fund in an
amount equal  to the penal sum of the
bond before beginning of  plugging and
abandonment of  the injection well; or
  (ii) Fund the standby trust fund in an
amount equal  to the penal sum  within
15 days after an order to begin plugging
and abandonment is issued by the Re-
gional Administrator  or a U.S. district
court or other court  of competent ju-
risdiction; or
  (iii) Provide  alternate financial as-
surance as specified in this section, and
obtain  the  Regional Administrator's
written approval of the  assurance pro-
vided, within 90 days after receipt by
both the owner or operator and the Re-
gional Administrator of  a  notice of
cancellation of the  bond from the sur-
ety.
  (5) Under the terms of the bond, the
surety will become liable  on the bond
obligation when the owner or  operator
fails to perform as guaranteed by the
bond.
  (6) The penal sum of  the bond must
be in amount at least equal to the cur-
rent plugging and  abandonment cost
estimate,   except  as   provided   in
§144.63(g).
  (7)  Whenever the current   plugging
and  abandonment  cost estimate  in-
creases  to an amount greater  than the
penal sum, the  owner or  operator,
within 60 days after the increase, must
either cause  the  penal  sum to  be in-
creased to an amount at least equal to
the current plugging and abandonment
cost estimate and submit evidence of
such increase to the Regional Adminis-
trator, or obtain other financial assur-
ance  as specified in this section to
cover the  increase. Whenever  the cur-
rent plugging and  abandonment cost
estimate decreases, the  penal sum may
be reduced to the amount of  the cur-
rent plugging and  abandonment cost
estimate following written approval by
the Regional Administrator.
  (8) Under the terms of the bond, the
surety may cancel the bond by sending
notice of cancellation, by certified mail
to the owner or operator and to the Re-
gional  Administrator.  Cancellation
may  not  occur,  however,  during 120
days beginning on  the  date of the re-
ceipt of the notice of cancellation by
both  owner or operator and  the  Re-
gional Administrator as evidenced by
the returned receipts.
  (9) The owner or operator may cancel
the bond if the Regional Administrator
has given prior written consent based
on his receipt of  evidence of alternate
financial assurance as specified in  this
section.
  (c) Surety bond  guaranteeing perform-
ance of plugging  and abandonment. (1)
An owner or operator may satisfy the
                                    658

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.63
requirements of this section by obtain-
ing a surety bond  which conforms to
the requirements of this paragraph and
submitting the bond to the Regional
Administrator. An owner or operator of
a new facility must submit the bond to
the Regional  Administrator with the
permit application  or for approval to
operate under rule. The  bond must be
effective before injection of hazardous
waste is started. The surety company
issuing the bond must, at a minimum,
be  among  those  listed  as  acceptable
sureties  on Federal bonds in Circular
570 of  the  U.S. Department  of the
Treasury.
  (2) The wording of the surety bond
must be identical to the wording speci-
fied in §144.70(c).
  (3) The owner or operator who uses a
surety bond   to  satisfy the  require-
ments of this  section must also estab-
lish a  standby trust fund.  Under the
terms of the  bond,  all payments made
thereunder will be  deposited  by the
surety directly into the  standby trust
fund in  accordance with instructions
from the Regional Administrator. The
standby trust must meet the require-
ments  specified  in §144.63(a),  except
that:
  (i) An original signed duplicate of the
trust agreement must be submitted to
the Regional  Administrator with the
surety bond; and
  (ii) Unless the standby trust  fund is
funded pursuant to the requirements of
this section, the  following are  not re-
quired by these regulations:
  (A) Payments into the trust fund as
specified in § 144.63(a);
  (B) Updating of  Schedule  A of the
trust agreement [see § 144.70(a)] to show
current  plugging  and  abandonment
cost estimates;
  (C) Annual valuations as required by
the trust agreement; and
  (D)  Notices of nonpayment  as  re-
quired by the trust agreement.
  (4) The bond must guarantee that the
owner or operator will:
  (i) Perform  plugging and  abandon-
ment in accordance with the plugging
and abandonment plan and  other  re-
quirements of the permit for the injec-
tion well whenever required to do so; or
  (ii) Provide alternate financial assur-
ance as specified in this section, and
obtain  the Regional Administrator's
written approval of the assurance pro-
vided,  within 90 days after receipt by
both the owner or operator and the Re-
gional Administrator  of a notice of
cancellation of the bond from the sur-
ety.
  (5) Under the terms of the bond, the
surety will become liable on the bond
obligation when the owner or  operator
fails to perform as guaranteed by the
bond. Following a determination that
the owner or operator has failed to per-
form plugging and abandonment in ac-
cordance with the plugging and aban-
donment plan  and  other  permit re-
quirements when  required to do so,
under terms of the bond the surety will
perform plugging and abandonment as
guaranteed by the bond or  will deposit
the amount of the penal sum  into the
standby trust fund.
  (6) The penal sum of the bond  must
be in an amount at least equal to the
current  plugging   and  abandonment
cost estimate.
  (7) Whenever the  current plugging
and abandonment  cost estimate in-
creases to an amount greater than the
penal  sum,  the  owner or  operator,
within 60 days after the increase,  must
either  cause  the  penal sum to be in-
creased to an amount at least equal to
the current plugging and abandonment
cost estimate and submit  evidence of
such increase to the Regional Adminis-
trator, or obtain other financial assur-
ance as specified in this section. When-
ever the  plugging  and abandonment
cost estimate decreases, the penal sum
may be reduced to  the amount of the
current  plugging   and  abandonment
cost estimate  following  written ap-
proval by the Regional Administrator.
  (8) Under the terms of the bond, the
surety may cancel the bond by sending
notice  of cancellation by certified mail
to the owner or operator and to the Re-
gional   Administrator.  Cancellation
may not occur, however, during the 120
days beginning on the date of receipt of
the notice of cancellation by both the
owner or operator and the Regional Ad-
ministrator, as evidenced by the return
receipts.
  (9) The owner or operator may cancel
the bond if the Regional Administrator
has given prior written consent. The
Regional Administrator will   provide
such written consent when:
                                    659

-------
§144.63
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (1) An  owner or operator substitute
alternate financial assurance  as speci-
fied in this section; or
  (ii)  The Regional  Administrator re-
leases the owner or operator  from the
requirements of this section in accord-
ance with §144.63(1).
  (10) The surety will not be liable for
deficiencies in the performance of plug-
ging and abandonment by the  owner or
operator after the Regional  Adminis-
trator releases the owner or  operator
from  the requirements of this section
in accordance with §144.63(1).
  (d) Plugging and abandonment letter of
credit. (1) An  owner or operator  may
satisfy the requirements of this section
by obtaining  an  irrevocable standby
letter of credit which  conforms to the
requirements  of  this  paragraph   and
submitting the letter  to the  Regional
Administrator. An owner or operator of
an injection  well must submit  the
letter of credit to the Regional Admin-
istrator  during submission of the per-
mit application or for approval to oper-
ate under rule.  The  letter   of credit
must  be effective before initial injec-
tion of hazardous  waste. The issuing
institution must  be  an entity which
has the  authority to  issue letters of
credit and whose letter-of-credit oper-
ations are regulated and examined by a
Federal or State agency.
  (2) The wording of the letter of credit
must  be  identical to the wording speci-
fied in §144.70(d).
  (3) An  owner or operator who uses a
letter of credit to satisfy the require-
ments of this  section must also estab-
lish a standby trust fund.  Under the
terms of  the  letter  of credit,  all
amounts paid pursuant to a  draft by
the Regional Administrator will be de-
posited by the issuing institution di-
rectly into the  standby trust fund in
accordance with instructions  from the
Regional Administrator.  This standby
trust  fund must meet the requirements
of the trust fund specified in §144.63(a),
except that:
  (i) An  originally signed duplicate of
the trust agreement must be submitted
to the Regional Administrator with the
letter of credit; and
  (ii)  Unless the  standby trust fund is
funded pursuant to the  requirements of
this section, the following are not re-
quired by these regulations:
  (A)  Payments into the trust fund as
specified in §144.63(a);
  (B)  Updating  of  Schedule A  of  the
trust agreement (see §144.70(a)) to show
current  plugging  and  abandonment
cost estimates;
  (C) Annual valuations as required by
the trust agreement; and
  (D)  Notices  of  nonpayment  as  re-
quired by the trust agreement.
  (4) The letter of credit must be  ac-
companied by a letter from the owner
or operator  referring to the  letter of
credit  by number,  issuing institution,
and date, and providing the following
information: the  EPA  Identification
Number, name, and address of the facil-
ity, and the amount of funds assured
for plugging and abandonment of  the
well by the letter of credit.
  (5) The letter of credit must be irrev-
ocable and  issued  for a  period  of at
least 1 year. The letter of credit must
provide that the expiration date will be
automatically extended for a period of
at least 1 year unless, at least 120 days
before the current expiration date,  the
issuing institution  notifies both  the
owner or operator and the Regional  Ad-
ministrator  by certified mail of a deci-
sion not  to extend the expiration date.
Under the terms of the letter of credit,
the 120 days  will  begin  on the date
when  both  the owner  or  operator  and
the Regional  Administrator  have  re-
ceived the notice, as evidenced by  the
return receipts.
  (6) The letter of credit must be issued
in an  amount at least equal to the cur-
rent plugging  and abandonment  cost
estimate,  except   as  provided   in
§144.63(g).
  (7)  Whenever  the current  plugging
and  abandonment  cost  estimate  in-
creases to an amount greater than  the
amount of the credit, the owner or op-
erator,  within 60  days  after  the  in-
crease, must either cause the amount
of the credit to  be  increased so that it
at least equals the current plugging
and abandonment  cost  estimate  and
submit evidence .of such increase to the
Regional  Administrator,   or  obtain
other financial  assurance  as specified
in this section  to  cover the increase.
Whenever the  current  plugging  and
abandonment  cost  estimate  decreases,
the amount of the  credit may be re-
duced  to the amount  of  the  current
                                     660

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.63
plugging1 and abandonment cost esti-
mate following written approval by the
Regional Administrator.
  (8) Following a determination that
the owner or operator has failed to per-
form final plugging and abandonment
in accordance  with the plugging and
abandonment plan and other permit re-
quirements when required to do so, the
Regional Administrator  may  draw on
the letter of credit.
  (9) If the owner or operator  does not
establish alternate financial assurance
as specified in this section and obtain
written approval of such alternate  as-
surance  from  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator  within 90  days after receipt by
both the owner or operator and the Re-
gional  Administrator of  a notice from
the issuing institution that it has  de-
cided not to extend the letter  of credit
beyond the current expiration date, the
Regional Administrator  will  draw  on
the letter of credit. The Regional Ad-
ministrator may delay the drawing if
the issuing institution grants an exten-
sion of the term of the credit. During
the last 30 days of any such extension
the Regional Administrator will draw
on the letter of credit if the owner or
operator has failed to provide alternate
financial assurance as specified in this
section and obtain written approval of
such assurance from the Regional Ad-
ministrator.
  (10) The Regional Administrator will
return  the letter of credit  to the
issuing  institution  for  termination
when:
  (i) An owner or operator substitutes
alternate financial assurance as speci-
fied in this section; or
  (ii) The Regional Administrator  re-
leases the owner or operator from the
requirements of this section in accord-
ance with §144.63(1).
  (e) Plugging and  abandonment insur-
ance. (1) An owner or operator may sat-
isfy the requirements of this section by
obtaining plugging and  abandonment
insurance which conforms to  the  re-
quirements of this paragraph and sub-
mitting a certificate of such insurance
to  the  Regional Administrator.  An
owner  or operator  of a  new injection
well must submit the certificate of  in-
surance to the Regional Administrator
with the permit application or for ap-
proval  operate under rule. The insur-
ance must be effective before injection
starts.  At  a  minimum,  the  insurer
must be licensed to transact the busi-
ness of insurance, or eligible to provide
insurance as an  excess or surplus lines
insurer, in one or more States.
  (2) The wording  of the certificate of
insurance must  be identical  to  the
wording specified in §144.70(e).
  (3) The plugging  and abandonment
insurance policy must be issued for a
face amount at least equal to the cur-
rent plugging and abandonment esti-
mate, except as provided in §144.63(g).
The term "face  amount" means  the
total amount  the  insurer is obligated
to pay  under  the  policy. Actual pay-
ments by the  insurer will not change
the face amount, although the insurers
future liability will be lowered by  the
amount of the payments.
  (4) The plugging  and abandonment
insurance policy must guarantee that
funds will be available  whenever final
plugging and abandonment occurs. The
policy must also guarantee that once
plugging and abandonment begins,  the
issurer  will be responsible for paying
out funds, up to an amount equal to
the face amount of the policy, upon the
direction of  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator, to such party or parties as  the
Regional Administrator specifies.
  (5)  After  beginning  plugging  and
abandonment,  an owner or operator or
any other person authorized to perform
plugging  and  abandonment  may  re-
quest reimbursement for plugging and
abandonment expenditures by  submit-
ting itemized bills to the Regional Ad-
ministrator. Within 60  days after re-
ceiving  bills for  plugging and abandon-
ment activities,  the Regional Adminis-
trator will determine whether the plug-
ging  and abandonment  expenditures
are in  accordance with the plugging
and  abandonment  plan  or otherwise
justified, and if so, he will instruct the
insurer  to make reimbursement in such
amounts  as the  Regional  Adminis-
trator specifies  in writing. If  the Re-
gional Administrator has reason to be-
lieve  that the  cost of  plugging and
abandonment  will  be   significantly
greater  than the  face amount  of  the
policy,  he may  withhold reimburse-
ment of such amounts as he deems pru-
dent until he determines, in accordance
                                    661

-------
§144.63
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
with §144.63(1), that the owner or oper-
ator is no longer required to maintain
financial assurance  for plugging and
abandonment of the injection well.
  (6) The owner or operator must main-
tain the policy in full force and effect
until the Regional Administrator con-
sents to termination of the  policy by
the owner  or operator as specified  in
paragraph (e)(10)  of this section. Fail-
ure to  pay the  premium, without sub-
stitution of alternate financial assur-
ance as  specified in this section, will
constitute  a significant violation  of
these  regulations,   warranting  such
remedy as the Regional Administrator
deems  necessary. Such violation will
be deemed to begin upon receipt by the
Regional Administrator of a notice  of
future   cancellation,  termination,  or
failure to renew due to nonpayment of
the  premium,  rather than  upon the
date of expiration.
  (7) Each  policy must contain provi-
sions allowing  assignment  to a  suc-
cessor owner or operator. Such assign-
ment may be conditional upon consent
of the insurer, provided such consent is
not unreasonably refused.
  (8) The policy must provide that the
insurer  may not  cancel, terminate,  or
fail to renew the policy except for fail-
ure  to  pay the  premium.  The  auto-
matic renewal of the  policy must, at a
minimum, provide the insured with the
option of renewal at the face amount of
the expiring policy. If there is a failure
to pay the premium, the insurer  may
elect to cancel, terminate, or fail  to
renew the policy by sending notice by
certified mail to the owner or operator
and  the  Regional Administrator. Can-
cellation, termination,  or  failure  to
renew may not occur, however, during
120 days beginning with the date of re-
ceipt of the notice by both the Re-
gional Administrator and the owner or
operator, as evidenced by the return of
receipts. Cancellation, termination,  or
failure to renew may not occur and the
policy will remain in full force and ef-
fect  in the event that on or before the
date of expiration:
  (i)  The  Regional   Administrator
deems the injection well abandoned; or
  (ii) The permit is terminated or re-
voked or a new permit is denied; or
  (iii) Plugging and abandonment is or-
dered by the Regional Administrator or
a U.S. district court or other court of
competent jurisdiction; or
  (iv) The owner or operator is named
as debtor in a voluntary or involuntary
proceeding under title 11 (Bankruptcy),
U.S. Code; or
  (v) The premium due is paid.
  (9)  Whenever  the  current plugging
and  abandonment  cost  estimate  in-
creases to an amount greater than  the
face amount of the policy, the owner or
operator,  within 60 days after the in-
crease,  must either cause  the  face
amount to be increased  to an amount
at least equal to the current plugging
and abandonment estimate and submit
evidence of such increase to the  Re-
gional Administrator, or obtain  other
financial assurance as specified in this
section to cover  the increase. Whenever
the current  plugging and abandonment
cost  estimate  decreases,   the   face
amount may be  reduced to the amount
of the current plugging  and abandon-
ment cost estimate following written
approval  by  the Regional  Adminis-
trator.
  (10) The Regional Administrator will
give written consent to  the owner or
operator that he may terminate the in-
surance policy when:
  (i) An owner or operator substitutes
alternate  financial assurance as speci-
fied in this section; or
  (ii) The Regional  Administrator re-
leases the owner or  operator from  the
requirements of  this section in accord-
ance with §144.63(1).
  (f) Financial test and corporate  guar-
antee for plugging and abandonment. (1)
An owner or operator may satisfy  the
requirements of this section by  dem-
onstrating that  he passes a financial
test as specified in this  paragraph. To
pass this  test the owner or operator
must meet the criteria  of either  para-
graph  (f)(l)(i) or (f)(l)(ii) of this sec-
tion:
  (i) The owner or operator must  have:
  (A) Two of the following three ratios:
A ratio of total  liabilities to net worth
less  than 2.0; a ratio of the sum of net
income plus  depreciation,   depletion,
and  amortization to total  liabilities
greater than 0.1; and a ratio  of current
assets to  current liabilities greater
than 1.5; and
  (B) Net  working capital and tangible
net worth each  at least six  times  the
                                    662

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §144.63
sum of the current plugging and aban-
donment cost estimate; and
  (C) Tangible net worth of at least $10
million; and
  (D)  Assets in  the  United  States
amounting to at least 90 percent of his
total assets  or  at least six times the
sum of the-C.urrent- plugging and aban-
donment cost estimate.
  (ii) The owner or operator must have:
  (A) A current  rating for his most re-
cent bond issuance  of AAA, AA,  A or
BBB as issued by Standard and Poor's
or Aaa, Aa, A, or  Baa  as issued by
Moody's; and
  (B) Tangible net worth at least six
times the sum of the current plugging
and abandonment cost estimate; and
  (C) Tangible net worth of at least $10
million; and
  (D) Assets  located  in  the  United
States amounting to at least 90 percent
of his total assets or at least six times
the  sum  of the current  plugging and
abandonment cost estimates.
  (2) The  phrase "current plugging and
abandonment cost estimate" as used in
paragraph (f)(l) of this section refers to
the cost estimate required to be shown
in paragraphs 1  through 4 of the letter
from the owner's or  operator's chief fi-
nancial officer §144.70(f).
  (3) To  demonstrate  that he meets
this  test, the owner  or operator must
submit  the following items to the Re-
gional Administrator:
  (i) A letter signed by the owner's or
operator's chief financial  officer  and
worded as specified in §144.70(f); and
  (ii) A copy of the independent  cer-
tified public accountant's report on ex-
amination of the owner's or operator's
financial  statements for  the latest
completed fiscal year; and
  (iii) A special report from the owner's
or operator's independent certified pub-
lic accountant to the owner or operator
stating that:
  (A) He has compared the data which
;he letter from the chief financial  offi-
3er  specifies as having  been derived
'rom the  independently audited, year-
md financial statements for the latest
'iscal year with the amounts in such fi-
lancial statements; and
  (B) In connection  with that proce-
 ure, no matters came to his attention
vhich caused him to believe that the
ipecified data should be adjusted.
  (4) An owner or operator of a new in-
jection well must  submit  the  items
specified in paragraph (f)(3) of this sec-
tion  to  the  Regional  Administrator
within 90 days after the close of each
succeeding  fiscal  year.  This informa-
tion must consist of all three  items
specified in paragraph (f)(3) of this sec-
tion.
  (5)  After  the initial  submission of
items  specified in paragraph  (f)(3) of
this section,  the  owner  or operator
must send updated information to the
Regional Administrator  within 90 days
after the close of each succeeding fiscal
year. This information must consist of
all  three  items specified in paragraph
(f)(3) of this section.
  (6) If the owner or operator no longer
meets the requirements of paragraph
(f)(l) of this section, he  must send no-
tice to the  Regional Administrator of
intent to establish alternate financial
assurance as specified in this  section.
The notice  must be sent by certified
mail within 90 days after the end of the
fiscal year  for which the year-end fi-
nancial data show that the owner or
operator no longer meets the  require-
ments. The owner  or operator must
provide the alternate financial assur-
ance within 120 days  after the end of
such fiscal year.
  (7) The Regional Administrator may.
based on  a  reasonable belief that the
owner or operator may no longer meet
the requirements of paragraph (f)(l) of
this section, require reports of finan-
cial condition  at  any time from  the
owner or operator in addition to those
specified in  paragraph (f)(3) of this sec-
tion.  If  the  Regional  Administrator
finds, on  the basis  of such  reports or
other information, that the owner or
operator no longer meets the  require-
ments of paragraph (f)(l) of this sec-
tion, the owner or operator must pro-
vide alternate  financial  assurance as
specified in  this section  within 30 days
after notification of such a finding.
  (8) The Regional  Administrator may
disallow use of this test  on the basis of
qualifications  in the opinion expressed
by the independent certified public ac-
countant in his report on examination
of the owner's or operator's financial
statements  [see paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of
this section].  An adverse  opinion  or
disclaimer of opinion will be cause  for
                                     663
      203-160  D-22

-------
§144.63
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
disallowance.  The  Regional  Adminis-
trator will  evaluate other  qualifica-
tions on an individual basis. The owner
or operator  must provide alternate fi-
nancial assurance as specified in this
section within 30 days after  notifica-
tion of the disallowance.
  (9) The owner or operator is no longer
required to  submit the items  specified
in paragraph (f)(3) of this section when:
  (i) An owner or operator substitutes
alternate  financial  assurance  as speci-
fied in this section; or
  (ii) The Regional Administrator re-
leases the owner or operator from the
requirements of this section in accord-
ance with §144.63(1).
  (10) An owner or  operator may meet
the requirements of this section by ob-
taining a written guarantee,  hereafter
referred  to  as "corporate guarantee."
The guarantee must be the parent cor-
poration of the owner or operator. The
guarantee must meet the requirements
for owners or operators in paragraphs
(f)(l) through  (p(8) of this section and
must comply with the terms of the cor-
porate guarantee. The wording of the
corporate guarantee must be  identical
to the wording specified  in §144.70(h).
The corporate guarantee must accom-
pany the items sent to the  Regional
Administrator  as  specified  in  para-
graph (f)(3)  of this section. The terms
of the corporate guarantee must pro-
vide that:
  (i) If the  owner or operator fails to
perform plugging and abandonment of
the injection well covered by the cor-
porate guarantee in accordance with
the  plugging  and  abandonment  plan
and other permit requirements when-
ever required  to do so, the guarantee
will do so or establish a trust fund as
specified in §144.63(a)  in  the  name of
the owner or operator.
  (ii) The corporate guarantee will re-
main in  force  unless  the guarantor
sends  notice  of  cancellation by cer-
tified mail  to the owner  or  operator
and the  Regional  Administrator, as
evidenced by the return receipts. Can-
cellation may not occur, however, dur-
ing the 120 days beginning on the date
of receipt of the notice of cancellation
by both the owner or operator and the
Regional  Administrator,  as  evidenced
by the return receipts.
  (iii) If the owner or operator fails to
provide alternate  financial assurance
as specified in this section and obtain
the written approval of such alternate
assurance from the Regional Adminis-
trator within 90 days after receipt by
both the owner or operator and the Re-
gional Administrator  of a notice of
cancellation  of  the  corporate guar-
antee  from the  guarantor, the guar-
antor will  provide such alternative fi-
nancial assurance  in the name of the
owner or operator.
  (g)  Use  of multiple financial, mecha-
nisms.  An owner or operator may sat-
isfy the requirements of this section by
establishing more  than  one financial
mechanism per  injection well. These
mechanisms are limited to trust funds,
surety bonds, guaranteeing payment
into a trust fund, letters of credit, and
insurance.  The mechanisms must be as
specified in paragraphs (a), (b), (d), and
(e), respectively, of this section, except
that it is  the combination of mecha-
nisms, rather than the single mecha-
nism, which must provide financial as-
surance for an amount at least equal to
the  adjusted  plugging and  abandon-
ment cost.  If an owner  or operator uses
a trust fund in combination with a sur-
ety bond or letter of credit, he may use
that trust  fund as the standby  trust
fund for the other mechanisms. A sin-
gle standby trust  may be established
for two or  more mechanisms. The Re-
gional Administrator may invoke any
or all of the mechanisms to provide for
plugging and abandonment of the injec-
tion well.
  (h)  Use of a financial  mechanism  for
multiple facilities. An owner or operator
may use  a financial assurance mecha-
nism specified in this  section to meet
the  requirements  of this section for
more than  one injection well. Evidence
of financial assurance submitted to the
Regional Administrator must include a
list  showing, for each  injection well.
the EPA Identification Number, name,
address, and the amount of funds foi
plugging and abandonment assured bs
the mechanism.  If the injection  wells
covered by the mechanism are in more
than one Region, identical evidence o
financial assurance must be submittet
to and maintained with the Regiona
Administrators of all  such  Regions
The amount of funds available throug
                                    664

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.65
the mechanism must  be no less than
the sum of funds that would be avail-
able if a separate mechanism had been
established and maintained for each in-
jection  well. In directing funds avail-
able through the mechanism for plug-
ging- and abandonment of any of the in-
jection  wells  covered by the  mecha-
nism, the Regional Administrator may
direct only the amount  of funds  des-
ignated for that injection well, unless
the owner or operator agrees to use ad-
ditional  funds  available  under   the
mechanism.
  (i) Release of the owner  or operator
from  the  requirements of this  section.
Within 60 days after receiving certifi-
cations from the owner or operator and
an independent registered professional
engineer that  plugging  and abandon-
ment has been accomplished in accord-
ance  with  the  plugging and abandon-
ment plan, the  Regional  Administrator
will  notify the owner or operator  in
writing that he is no longer required by
this  section to maintain financial  as-
surance for plugging and abandonment
of the injection  well, unless the Re-
gional Administrator has reason to be-
lieve  that  plugging and  abandonment
has not  been  in accordance with  the
plugging and abandonment plan.

§ 144.64  Incapacity of owners or opera-
   tors, guarantors, or financial insti-
   tutions.
  (a) An owner  or operator must notify
the  Regional  Administrator by  cer-
tified mail of the  commencement of a
voluntary  or  involuntary  proceeding
under title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code,
naming the owner or operator as debt-
or,  within  10 business days after the
commencement  of the proceeding.  A
guarantor of a  corporate guarantee  as
specified in §144.63(f) must make such a
notification if he is named as debtor, as
required under  the terms of the guar-
antee (§144.70(f)).
  (b) An owner  or operator who fulfills
the requirements of §144.63  by  obtain-
ing a letter of  credit, surety bond,  or
insurance policy will be deemed to be
without the required  financial  assur-
ance or liability coverage in the event
of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a suspen-
sion  or revocation  of the  license  or
charter of the issuing institution. The
owner or operator must establish other
financial  assurance or  liability  cov-
erage  within  60 days  after  such an
event.

§ 144.65 Use of State-required mecha-
    nisms.
  (a)  For a  facility located in a State
where EPA is  administering  the re-
quirements  of this subpart but where
the State has  plugging and abandon-
ment regulations that include require-
ments for financial assurance of plug-
ging and abandonment, an owner or op-
erator may use  State-required finan-
cial mechanisms to meet the require-
ments of this subpart if the Regional
Administrator   determines  that   the
State mechanisms are at least equiva-
lent to the mechanisms specified in
this subpart.  The  Regional Adminis-
trator will evaluate the equivalency of
the mechanisms mainly in terms of (1)
certainty  of the availability  of funds
for the required plugging and abandon-
ment activities  and (2) the amount of
funds that will be made  available. The
Regional Administrator may also  con-
sider  other factors. The owner or oper-
ator must submit to the Regional Ad-
ministrator evidence of the establish-
ment of the mechanism together with a
letter  requesting that  the State-re-
quired mechanism be  considered  ac-
ceptable for meeting the requirements
of this subpart. The submittal must in-
clude  the following information:  The
facility's EPA  Identification  Number,
name and address, and the amounts of
funds  for  plugging and abandonment
coverage assured  by the mechanism.
The Regional Administrator will notify
the owner or operator of his determina-
tion regarding the mechanism's accept-
ability. The Regional  Administrator
may require the owner or  operator to
submit additional  information as is
deemed necessary for making this de-
termination.
  (b) If a State-required mechanism is
found  acceptable as specified  in para-
graph (a) of this section  except for the
amount of  funds available, the owner
or  operator may satisfy the  require-
ments of this subpart by increasing the
funds available  through the State-re-
quired mechanism or using additional
mechanisms as  specified in this  sub-
part.  The  amounts of funds available
                                    665

-------
§144.66
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
through the State and Federal mecha-
nisms must at least equal the amounts
required by this subpart.

§ 144.66  State assumption of responsi-
    bility.
  (a) If a State either assumes legal re-
sponsibility  for  an owner's  or opera-
tor's compliance with the plugging and
abandonment  requirements   of  these
regulations or assures that  funds  will
be  available from State sources to
cover these requirements, the owner or
operator will be in compliance with the
requirements of this subpart if the Re-
gional Administrator determines that
the  State's  assumption  of  responsi-
bility  is at  least equivalent to  the
mechanisms specified in  this subpart.
The Regional Administrator will evalu-
ate the  equivalency of State guaran-
tees mainly in terms of (1) certainty of
the availability of funds for the  re-
quired plugging and abandonment  cov-
erage and (2) the amount of funds that
will be  made available. The Regional
Administrator may also consider other
factors.  The  owner or  operator must
submit to  the Regional Administrator
a letter from the  State describing the
nature of the State's assumption of re-
sponsibility together with a letter from
the owner  or operator requesting that
the State's asumption of responsibility
be  considered acceptable  for meeting
the requirements  of this subpart.  The
letter from the State must include, or
have attached to  it, the  following in-
formation:  the facility's EPA Identi-
fication Number,  name  and  address,
and the amounts of funds for plugging
and abandonment coverage  that are
guaranteed by the State.  The Regional
Administrator will notify the owner or
operator of  his determination regard-
ing the acceptability  of the State's
guarantee  in lieu of mechanisms speci-
fied in  this subpart. The Regional Ad-
ministrator  may  require  the owner or
operator to submit additional informa-
tion as  is  deemed necessary to  make
this determination. Pending this  deter-
mination, the owner or operator will be
deemed  to  be  in  compliance   with
§144.63.
  (b) If a State's assumption of respon-
sibility is found acceptable as specified
in paragraph (a) of this section except
for the amount of funds available, the
owner or operator may satisfy the re-
quirements of this subpart by  use  of
both  the State's assurance  and addi-
tional financial  mechanisms  as  speci-
fied in this subpart.  The amount  of
funds available through the  State  and
Federal  mechanisms  must   at  least
equal the amount required by this  sub-
part.

§ 144.70  Wording of the instruments.
  (a)(l) A trust agreement for a trust
fund,  as specified  in  §144.63(a) of  this
chapter, must be worded as follows, ex-
cept that instructions in  brackets are
to be replaced with the relevant infor-
mation and the brackets deleted:

            TRUST AGREEMENT

 TRUST AGREEMENT, the "Agreement,"
entered  into as of [date] by and between
[name of the owner or operator], a [name of
State]  [insert "corporation," "partnership,"
"association,"  or  "proprietorship"],   the
"Grantor," and [name of corporate trustee],
[insert "incorporated in the State of	"
or "a national bank"], the "Trustee."
 Whereas, the United States  Environmental
Protection Agency, "EPA," an agency of the
United States Government,  has  established
certain regulations applicable to the  Grant-
or, requiring that an owner or operator of an
injection well shall provide  assurance  that
funds will be available when needed for plug-
ging and abandonment of the injection  well,
 Whereas, the Grantor has elected to estab-
lish a trust to provide all or  part of such fi-
nancial assurance for the facility(iei3) identi-
fied herein,
 Whereas, the Grantor, acting through  its
duly authorized officers, has selected  the
Trustee to be the trustee under this agree-
ment, and the Trustee is willing to act as
trustee,
 Now, therefore, the Grantor and the Trust-
ee agree as follows:
 Section 1. Definitions. As used in this Agree-
ment:
 (a) The term "Grantor" means the owner or
operator who enters into this  Agreement and
any successors or assigns of the Grantor.
 (b) The term "Trustee" means the Trustee
who enters into this Agreement and any suc-
cessor Trustee.
 (c) Facility or activity means any "under-
ground injection well" or any other facility
or  activity  that is  subject to  regulation
under the Underground  Injection  Control
Program.
 Section 2. Identification  of Facilities and Cost
Estimates. This Agreement pertains to the fa-
cilities and cost estimates identified on  at-
tached Schedule A [on Schedule A, for  each
facility list the EPA Identification Number,
                                      666

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                 §144.70
name, address, and the current plugging and
abandonment  cost  estimate,  or  portions
thereof,  for which financial  assurance  is
demonstrated by this Agreement].
  Section 3. Establishment of Fund. The Grant-
or and the Trustee hereby establish a trust
fund, the "Fund," for the benefit of EPA. The
Grantor and the Trustee intend that no third
party  have access to the  Fund  except  as
herein provided The Fund is established ini-
tially as consisting of the property, which is
acceptable  to  the  Trustee,  described  in
Schedule  B attached hereto.  Such property
and  any other property  subsequently trans-
ferred to  the Trustee  is referred  to  as the
Fund, together with all earnings and profits
thereon,  less any payments or distributions
made by the Trustee pursuant to this Agree-
ment. The Fund shall be held by the Trustee,
IN  TRUST,  as hereinafter  provided.  The
Trustee shall  not be responsible nor shall it
undertake any responsibility for the amount
or adequacy of, nor any duty to collect from
the Grantor, any payments necessary to dis-
charge any  liabilities of the Grantor estab-
lished by EPA.
  Section 4.  Payment for  Plugging and Aban-
donment. The  Trustee shall make  payments
from the Fund as the EPA Regional Admin-
istrator shall direct, in writing, to provide
for the payment of the costs of plugging and
abandonment  of the injection wells covered
by this Agreement. The Trustee shall reim-
burse the Grantor or other persons as speci-
fied  by  the  EPA  Regional  Administrator
from the Fund for plugging and  abandon-
ment expenditures in such amounts  as the
EPA Regional Administrator shall direct  in
writing. In addition, the Trustee shall refund
to the Grantor such amounts as the EPA Re-
gional Administrator  specifies in writing
Upon refund, such funds shall no longer con-
stitute part of the Fund as defined herein
  Section 5.  Payments Comprising  the Fund.
Payments made to the Trustee for the Fund
shall consist of cash or securities acceptable
to the Trustee.
  Section 6. Trustee Management. The Trustee
shall invest and reinvest the principal and
income of the Fund and keep the  Fund in-
vested as a  single fund,  without distinction
between principal and income, in accordance
with general investment policies and guide-
lines which the Grantor may communicate
in writing to the Trustee from time to time,
subject, however,  to the provisions of this
Section  In  investing, reinvesting,  exchang-
ing,  selling, and managing  the Fund, the
Trustee shall discharge  his  duties with re-
spect to the trust fund solely in the interest
of the beneficiary and with  the care, skill,
prudence,  and  diligence  under   the  cir-
cumstances  then prevailing which persons of
prudence, acting in a like capacity and fa-
miliar with such matters, would use in the
conduct of an enterprise of  a like  character
and with like aims: except that
  (i) Securities or other  obligations of  the
Grantor, or any other owner or operator of
the facilities, or any of their affiliates as de-
fined in the Investment Company Act of 1940,
as amended. 15 U.S.C.  80a-2.(a), shall not be
acquired or held, unless they are  securities
or other obligations of the Federal  or a State
government;
  (ii) The Trustee is authorized to  invest  the
Fund in time  or demand  deposits  of  the
Trustee, to the extent insured by  an  agency
of the Federal or State government; and
  (ill) The Trustee is authorized to hold cash
awaiting   investment   or    distribution
uninvested for  a reasonable time  and with-
out  liability for the  payment of interest
thereon.
  Section 7. Commingling and Investment  The
Trustee is expressly authorized in  its discre-
tion:
  (a) To transfer from time to time  any or
all of the assets of the  Fund to any common,
commingled, or collective trust fund created
by the Trustee  in which the Fund  is eligible
to participate,  subject to all of the provi-
sions thereof, to be commingled with  the as-
sets  of other trusts  participating therein;
and
  (b) To purchase shares in any investment
company registered  under  the Investment
Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a-l  et seq.,
including one which may be created, man-
aged, underwritten, or to which investment
advice  is rendered or the shares of which  are
sold  by the Trustee. The  Trustee  may vote
shares  in its discretion.
  Section 8.  Express Powers  of Trustee. Without
in any way limiting the powers and  discre-
tions conferred upon  the Trustee  by  the
other provisions  of  this  Agreement or  by
law,  the Trustee is expressly authorized and
empowered:
  (a) To sell, exchange, convey, transfer, or
otherwise dispose of any property held by it,
by public or private sale.  No person dealing
with the Trustee shall be bound to  see to  the
application of the purchase  money or to in-
quire into the validity or expediency of any
such sale or other disposition:
  (b) To make, execute, acknowledge, and de-
liver any and all documents of transfer and
conveyance and any  and all other  instru-
ments  that may be necessary or appropriate
to carry out the powers herein granted;
  (c) To register any securities held in  the
Fund in its own name or in the name of a
nominee and to hold any  security in bearer
form or in book entry,  or to combine certifi-
cates representing such securities with cer-
tificates of the same issue held by the Trust-
ee in other  fiduciary capacities, or  to deposit
or arrange  for the deposit of such  securities
in  a  qualified  central  depository even
though, when  so deposited, such  securities
may be merged  and held in bulk in the name
of the nominee of such depositary with other
                                         667

-------
§144.70
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
securities deposited therein by another per-
son,  or to deposit or arrange for the deposit
of any securities issued by the United States
Government, or any  agency or instrumen-
tality thereof, with a Federal Reserve bank,
but  the  books and records  of the  Trustee
shall at all times show that all such securi-
ties are part of the Fund;
  (d) To deposit any cash in the Fund in in-
terest-bearing accounts maintained or sav-
ings  certificates issued by the Trustee, in its
separate  corporate capacity, or in  any other
banking   institution   affiliated   with  the
Trustee,  to the extent insured by  an agency
of the Federal or State government; and
  (e) To compromise or otherwise  adjust all
claims in favor of or against the Fund.
  Section  9. Taxes and Expenses. All taxes of
any  kind that may  be  assessed  or levied
against or in respect of the Fund and all bro-
kerage commissions incurred by  the Fund
shall be  paid from the Fund. All  other ex-
penses incurred by the  Trustee in connection
with the  administration  of  this  Trust, in-
cluding fees for legal services rendered to the
Trustee,  the compensation of the Trustee  to
the extent not paid directly by the Grantor,
and  all other proper  charges and disburse-
ments of the Trustee  shall be paid from the
Fund.
  Section  10.  Annual Valuation. The  Trustee
shall annually, at least 30 days prior to the
anniversary  date  of  establishment  of the
Fund, furnish to the Grantor and  to the ap-
propriate EPA  Regional  Administrator  a
statement confirming the value of  the Trust.
Any  securities in the Fund shall be valued at
market value as of no more than  60  days
prior to  the  anniversary date of  establish-
ment of the Fund. The failure of the Grantor
to object in writing to the Trustee within 90
days after the statement has been furnished
to the Grantor and the EPA Regional Admin-
istrator shall constitute a conclusively bind-
ing  assent  by  the  Grantor,  barring the
Grantor from asserting any claim or liability
against the Trustee with  respect to  matters
disclosed in the statement.
  Section  11.  Advice of Counsel. The  Trustee
may from time to time consult with counsel,
who  may be counsel to the Grantor, with re-
spect to  any question arising as to the con-
struction of this Agreement of any action to
be taken hereunder.  The Trustee shall  be
fully protected, to the extent permitted  by
law,  in acting upon the advice of counsel.
  Section  12. Trustee Compensation. The Trust-
ee shall be entitled to  reasonable  compensa-
tion  for its services as agreed upon in writ-
ing from  time to time with the Grantor.
  Section  13.  Successor  Trustee. The  Trustee
may resign or the Grantor may replace the
Trustee,  but such resignation or replacement
shall not be  effective until the Grantor has
appointed a successor trustee and this suc-
cessor accepts the appointment.  The suc-
cessor trustee shall have the  same  powers
and  duties  as  those  conferred upon  the
Trustee hereunder. Upon the successor trust-
ee's  acceptance  of  the  appointment,  the
Trustee shall assign, transfer, and pay over
to the successor trustee the funds and prop-
erties then constituting the Fund. If for any
reason the Grantor cannot or does not act in
the event of the resignation of the Trustee,
the Trustee may apply to a court of com-
petent jurisdiction for the appointment of a
successor trustee  or for  instructions. The
successor trustee shall specify the date  on
which it assumes administration of the trust
in a writing sent to the  Grantor, the  EPA
Regional  Administrator,  and  the  present
Trustee by certified mail 10 days before such
change  becomes effective. Any expenses in-
curred by the Trustee as  a  result of any of
the acts contemplated by this Section shall
be paid as provided in Section 9.
  Section 14. Instructions to the Trustee. All or-
ders,  requests,  and   instructions  by  the
Grantor  to the Trustee shall be  in writing,
signed by such persons as are designated in
the attached Exhibit A or  such other des-
ignees as  the  Grantor may designate  by
amendment to Exhibit A. The Trustee shall
be fully protected in acting without inquiry
in accordance with the Grantor's orders, re-
quests,  and  instructions.  All  orders,  re-
quests,  and instructions  by the EPA  Re-
gional Administrator to the Trustee shall be
in writing, signed by the  EPA Regional Ad-
ministrators of the Regions in which  the fa-
cilities are located,  or their designees, and
the Trustee shall act and  shall be fully pro-
tected in acting in accordance with such or-
ders, requests, and instructions. The Trustee
shall  have the right to assume, in  the ab-
sence of written notice to the contrary, that
no event constituting  a change or  a termi-
nation of the authority of any person to act
on behalf of the Grantor  or EPA hereunder
has occurred. The Trustee shall have no duty
to act  in  the  absence of such  orders, re-
quests,  and instructions  from the Grantor
and/or EPA, except as provided for herein.
  Section 15. Notice of Nonpayment. The Trust-
ee shall notify the Grantor  and the appro-
priate  EPA Regional Administrator,  by cer-
tified mail within 10 days  following the expi-
ration of the 30-day period after the anniver-
sary of the establishment of the Trust, if no
payment is received from  the Grantor during
that period. After the  pay-in period is com-
pleted, the Trustee shall  not be required to
send a notice of nonpayment.
  Section 16.  Amendment of Agreement.  This
Agreement may be amended by an  instru-
ment in writing executed by the Grantor, the
Trustee, and the appropriate EPA Regional
Administrator, or by the Trustee and  the ap-
propriate EPA Regional Administrator if the
Grantor ceases to exist.
  Section 17. Irrevocability and  Termination.
Subject to the right of the parties to amend
this Agreement as provided in  Section  16,
                                         668

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                 §144.70
this Trust shall be irrevocable and shall con-
tinue until terminated at the written agree-
ment of the  Grantor,  the Trustee, and the
EPA  Regional  Administrator,  or by the
Trustee  and  the  EPA  Regional  Adminis-
trator if the Grantor ceases to  exist.  Upon
termination of the Trust, all remaining trust
property, less final trust administration ex-
penses, shall be delivered to the Grantor
  Section 18.  Immunity  and Indemnification.
The Trustee shall not  incur personal liabil-
ity of any nature in connection with any act
or omission, made in good faith, in the ad-
ministration of this Trust, or in carrying out
any directions by the  Grantor or the EPA
Regional Administrator issued in accordance
with this Agreement. The Trustee shall be
indemnified  and  saved  harmless  by the
Grantor or from the Trust Fund,  or  both,
from  and against any personal  liability to
which the Trustee may be subjected by rea-
son of any act or conduct in its official ca-
pacity, including all expenses reasonably in-
curred in its defense in the event the Grant-
or fails to provide such defense.
  Section 19. Choice of Law. This Agreement
shall  be administered,  construed,  and en-
forced according to the laws of the State of
[insert name of State].
  Section 20. Interpretation. As used in this
Agreement, words in the singular include the
plural and words in the plural  include the
singular. The  descriptive headings  for each
Section of this  Agreement shall not affect
the interpretation or  the legal efficacy of
this Agreement.
  In Witness Whereof the parties have caused
this Agreement  to be executed by their re-
spective  officers  duly  authorized and  their
corporate seals to be hereunto affixed and at-
tested as of the date  first above written. The
parties below certify that the wording of this
Agreement is identical to the wording speci-
fied in 40 CFR 144.70(a)(l) as such regulations
were  constituted  on the  date  first  above
written.
[Signature of Grantor]
  By           [Title]
Attest:

                  [TITLE]

                  [SEAL]

[Signature of Trustee]
  By
Attest:

                  [TITLE]

                  [SEAL]

  (2) The following is an example of the
certification of acknowledgment which
must accompany  the trust agreement
'or  a   trust   fund  as  specified  in
 144.63(a). State requirements may dif-
fer on the proper content  of this ac-
knowledgment.
State of  	
County of	
  On this [date], before me personally came
[owner or operator] to me known, who, being
by me duly sworn, did depose and say that
she/he resides at  [address],  that she/he  is
[title]  of [corporation], the corporation de-
scribed in and which executed the above in-
strument; that she/he knows the seal of said
corporation; that the seal affixed to such in-
strument is such corporate seal; that  it was
so affixed by order to the Board  of Directors
of said corporation,  and that she/he  signed
her/his name thereto by like order.
[Signature of Notary Public]

  (b)  A surety bond  guaranteeing pay-
ment  into a  trust  fund, as specified in
§144.63 of this chapter, must be worded
as follows, except  that  instructions in
brackets are to be  replaced with the
relevant information and the brackets
deleted:

        FINANCIAL GUARANTEE BOND
Dated bond executed:	
Effective date:
  Principal: [legal name and business address
of owner or operator].
  Type of organization: [insert "individual,"
"joint venture,"  "partnership," or "corpora-
tion"].
State of incorporation:	
  Surety(ies):  [name(s)  and  business  ad-
dress(es)].
  EPA Identification Number, name, address,
and  plugging  and abandonment  amount(s)
for each facility  guaranteed by this bond [in-
dicate plugging  and abandonment amounts
separately]: 	
  Total penal sum of bond: $	
  Surety's bond number.	
  Know All Persons By These Presents, That
we, the  Principal and Sunty(ies) hereto are
firmly bound to the U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency (hereinafter called EPA), in
the above  penal sum for the payment of
which we bind ourselves, our heirs, execu-
tors, administrators, successors, and assigns
jointly and severally; provided that,  where
the Surety(ies) are corporations acting as co-
surties,  we, the  Sureties, bind ourselves in
such sum "jointly and severally" only for the
purpose  of allowing a joint action or actions
against any or all of us, and for all other pur-
poses each Surety binds itself, jointly and
severally with the Principal, for  the pay-
ment of such sum only as is set forth oppo-
site the  name  of such Surety, but if no limit
of liability is indicated, the limit of liability
shall be  the full amount of the penal sum.
                                         669

-------
§144.70
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  Whereas  said Principal  is required, under
the Underground Injection Control Regula-
tions (UIC), to have a permit or comply with
requirements to operate under rule in order
to own or operate each injection well identi-
fied above, and
  Whereas  said Principal is required to  pro-
vide financial  assurance  for  plugging  and
abandonment as a condition of the permit or
provisions to operate under rule, and
  Whereas  said  Principal shall  establish a
standby trust fund as is required when a sur-
ety bond is used to provide such financial as-
surance;
  Now, therefore, the conditions of the obli-
gation are such that if the Principal shall
faithfully,  before the beginning  of plugging
and abandonment  of each  injection  well
identified above, fund the standby trust fund
in the amount(s) identified above for the in-
jection well,
  Or if the Principal shall fund the standby
trust fund  in such amount(s) within 15 days
after an  order to begin plugging and aban-
donment is issued by an EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator or a U.S. district court or other
court of competent jurisdiction,
  Or, if the Principal shall provide alternate
financial assurance, as specified in subpart F
of 40 CPR part 144, as applicable,  and obtain
the EPA Regional  Administrator's written
approval of such assurance, within 90 days
after the date  of notice of cancellation is re-
ceived  by both the Principal  and the EPA
Regional  Administrator(s) from  the  Sur-
ety(ies),  then  this  obligation  shall be  null
and void, otherwise it is to remain in full
force and effect.
  The Surety(ies) shall become liable on this
bond obligation only when the Principal has
failed  to  fulfill the  conditions  described
above.  Upon notification by  an  EPA  Re-
gional Administrator that the Principal has
failed to perform as guaranteed by this bond,
the  Surety(ies) shall place   funds  in  the
amount guaranteed for  the injection well(s)
into the  standby trust funds as  directed by
the EPA Regional Administrator.
  The liability of the Surety(ies) shall not be
discharged by  any payment or succession of
payments hereunder,  unless and  until such
payment or payments shall amount in the
aggregate to the penal sum of the bond, but
in no event shall the obligation of the Sur-
ety(ies) hereunder exceed the amount of said
penal sum.
  The Surety(ies) may  cancel the bond by
sending notice of  cancellation by certified
mail to the Principal and to the EPA Re-
gional Admimstrator(s) for the Region(s)  in
which the  injection well(s) is  (are) located,
provided,  however,  that  that cancellation
shall not occur during the 120 days beginning
on the date of receipt of the notice of can-
cellation by both the Principal and the EPA
Regional Administrator(s), as evidenced by
the return receipts.
  The Principal may terminate this bond by
sending written notice to the  Surety(ies),
provided, however, that no such notice shall
become effective until the Surety(ies)  re-
ceive(s) written  authorization for  termi-
nation of the bond by the EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator(s) of the Region(s) in which the
bonded facility(ies) is (are) located.
  [The following  paragraph is an  optional
rider  that  may be  included  but is  not  re-
quired.]
  Principal and Surety(ies) hereby agree to
adjust the  penal sum of the bond yearly so
that it guarantees a new plugging and aban-
donment amount,  provided that the penal
sum does  not increase by  more  than 20
percent in  any one  year, and no decrease in
the penal sum takes place without the writ-
ten permission of the EPA Regional  Admin-
istrator(s).
  In Witness Whereof, the Principal and Sur-
ety(ies) have executed this Financial Guar-
antee Bond and have affixed their seals on
the date set forth above.
  The persons whose signatures appear below
hereby certify that  they are  authorized to
execute this surety bond  on  behalf of the
Principal and Surety(ies) and that the word-
ing of this surety bond is identical  to the
wording specified in 40 CFR 144.70(b)  as such
regulations were constituted on the date this
bond was executed.

                PRINCIPAL

[Signature^)]
[Name(s)]
[Title(s)]
[Corporate seal]

          CORPORATE SURETY(IBS)

[Name and address]
  State of incorporation:	.
  Liability limit: $	.
[Signature(s)]
[Name(s) and title(s)]
[Corporate seal]
[For every  co-surety,  provide  signature(s),
corporate seal, and other information in the
same manner as for Surety above.]
  Bond premium: $	.

  (c)  A surety bond  guaranteeing per-
formance   of  plugging and  abandon-
ment, as specified in §144.63(c), must be
worded as follows, except that  the in-
structions in brackets are to  be re-
placed  with the  relevant  information
and the brackets deleted:

            PERFORMANCE BOND
  Date bond executed:
  Effective date:
  Principal: [legal name and business address
of owner or operator].
                                         670

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                 §144.70
  Type of organization:  [Insert "individual,"
"joint  venture," "partnership," or "corpora-
tion"].
  State of incorporation:	.
  Surety(ies):  [name(s)   and  business  ad-
dress(es)]
  EPA Identification Number, name, address.
and plugging and abandonment amounts(s)
for each injection  well  guaranteed by this
bond [indicate  plugging and  abandonment
amounts for each well]:
  Total penal sum of bond' $	.
  Surety's bond number:	.
  Know All Persons By These Presents, That
We, the Principal and Surety(ies) hereto are
firmly bound to the U.S Environmental Pro-
tection Agency [hereinafter  called EPA], in
the above penal  sum  for the  payment of
which we bind ourselves, our heirs, execu-
tors,  administrators,  successors, and assigns
jointly and severally; provided that,  where
the Surety(ies) are corporations acting as co-
sureties, we, the Sureties, bind ourselves in
such  sum "jointly and severally" only for the
purpose of allowing a joint action  or actions
against any or all of us, and for all other pur-
poses each  Surety binds  itself, jointly and
severally with the Principal, for  the pay-
ment of such sum only as is set forth oppo-
site the name of such Surety, but if no limit
of liability is indicated, the limit of liability
shall  be the full amount of the penal sum.
  Whereas said Principal is  required,  under
the Undergound  Injection Control Regula-
tions, as amended, to have a permit or com-
ply with provisions to operate under rule for
each injection well identified above, and
  Whereas said Principal  is required to pro-
vide  financial  assurance for plugging and
abandonment as a condition of the permit or
approval to operate under rule, and
  Whereas said Principal shall establish  a
standby  trust  fund  as is required when  a
surety bond is used to provide such financial
assurance;
  Now, Therefore, the conditions of this obli-
gation are such  that if the  Principal  shall
faithfully perform plugging  and  abandon-
ment, whenever required to do so, of each in-
jection well for which this bond guarantees
plugging  and  abandonment,  in accordance
with the plugging and abandonment plan and
other rquirements of the permit  or provi-
sions  for operating under rule and  other re-
quirements  of the permit or provisions for
operating under  rule  as  may be  amended,
pursuant  to all  applicable  laws,  statutes,
rules  and regulations, as such laws, statutes,
rules, and regulations may be amended,
  Or,  if the Principal  shall provide alternate
financial assurance as specified in  subpart P
of 40  CFR part 144, and obtain the  EPA Re-
rional Administrator's written  approval of
such assurance, within 90  days after the date
3f notice of cancellation is received by both
the Principal and the EPA Regional Admin-
istrator(s) from the Surety(ies), then this ob-
ligation shall be  null and void,  otherwise it
is to remain in full force and effect.
  The Surety(ies) shall become liable on this
bond obligation only when the Principal has
failed  to  fulfill   the  conditions described
above.
  Upon notification by an EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator that the  Principal  has  been
found in violation of the plugging and aban-
donment requirements of 40 CFR part 144, for
an injection well  which this bond guarantees
performances of plugging and abandonment,
the Surety(ies) shall either perform plugging
and  abandonment  in  accordance with the
plugging  and abandonment plan  and  other
permit requirements or provisions for  oper-
ating under rule  and other requirements or
place the amount for plugging and abandon-
ment into a standby trust iund  as directed
by the EPA Regional Administrator.
  Upon notification by an EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator that  the Principal has failed to
provide  alternate  financial  assurance  as
specified in subpart F of 40 CFR part 144, and
obtain written approval of such assurance
from  the  EPA   Regional  Administrator(s)
during the 90 days following receipt  by both
the Principal and the EPA Regional Admin-
istrator(s) of a notice  of cancellation of the
bond, the Surety(ies) shall place funds in the
amount guaranteed for the injection well(s)
into the standby  trust fund as directed by
the EPA Regional Administrator.
  The surety(ies)  hereby waive(s) notifica-
tion of  amendments to plugging  and  aban-
donment  plans,  permits,  applicable  laws,
statutes,  rules, and regulations  and agrees
that no such amendment shall in any way al-
leviate its (their)  obligation on this bond.
  The liability of  the Surety(ies) shall not be
discharged by any payment or succession of
payments hereunder,  unless and until  such
payment  or payments shall amount in the
aggregate to the  penal sum of the bond, but
in no event shall the obligation of the Sur-
ety(ies) hereunder exceed the amount of said
penal sum.
  The Surety(ies) may cancel the bond by
sending notice by certified mail to the owner
or operator and to the EPA Regional Admin-
istrator(s) for the Region(s) in which the in-
jection  well(s)  is  (are) located, provided,
however,  that cancellation shall  not  occur
during the 120 days beginning  on the date of
receipt of the notice of cancellation  by both
the Principal and the EPA Regional Admin-
istrator^), as evidenced by  the return re-
ceipts.
  The principal may terminate this bond by
sending  written  notice to the  Surety(ies),
provided,  however, that no such notice shall
                                         671

-------
§144.70
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
become effective until the Surety(ies)  re-
ceive(s)  written  authorization  for  termi-
nation of the bond by the EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator(s) of the EPA Region(s) in which
the bonded injection well(s) is (are) located.
  [The following  paragraph is an  optional
rider  that  may  be included but is not  re-
quired.]
  Principal and Surety(ies)  hereby  agree to
adjust the  penal sum of the bond yearly so
that it guarantees a new plugging and aban-
donment amount, provided that the penal
sum  does  not increase  by more  than 20
percent in  any one year, and no decrease in
the  penal  sum  takes place without  the
written permission of the EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator(s).
  In Witness Whereof, The Principal and Sur-
ety(ies)  have  executed  this Performance
Bond and have affixed their seals on the date
set forth above.
  The persons whose signatures appear below
hereby certify that they are  authorized to
execute this  surety bond on  behalf  of the
Principal and Surety(ies) and that the word-
ing on this surety bond is  identical  to the
wording specified in 40 CFR, 144.70(c) as such
regulation  was constituted on the date  this
bond was executed.
  Principal.
[Signature(s)]
[Name(s)]
[Title(s)]
[Corporate  seal]
[Corporate  Surety(ies)]
[Name and  address]
  State of incorporation:
  Liability limit: $	.
[Signature(s)]
[Name(s) and title(s)]
  Corporate seal:
[For every  co-surety, provide signature(s),
corporate seal, and other information in the
same manner as for Surety above.]
  Bond premium: $	.

  (d) A  letter of  credit, as specified in
§144.63(d)  of  this   chapter,  must  be
worded  as follows,  except that instruc-
tions  in brackets  are to be  replaced
with the relevant information and the
brackets deleted:
  IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT

  Regional Administrator(s)
Region(s)	
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  Dear Sir or Madam:
  We hereby establish our Irrevocable Stand-
by Letter of Credit No. 	in your favor,
at the request and for the account of [own-
er's  or  operator's name and address] up to
the aggregate amount of [in words] U.S. dol-
lars  $	, available upon presentation  [in-
sert,  if more than  one Regional Adminis-
trator is a beneficiary, "by any one of you"]
of
  (1) Your  sight draft, bearing reference to
this letter of credit No.	, and
  (2) Your  signed statement reading as fol-
lows: "I certify that the amount of the draft
is payable pursuant  to  regulations  issued
under authority of the Safe Drinking Water
Act."
  This letter of credit is effective as of [date]
and shall  expire on  [date at  least 1 year
later],  but  such expiration  date shall be
automatically extended for a period of [at
least 1  year] on [date] and on each successive
expiration  date,  unless, at least 120 days be-
fore the current expiration date, we notify
both you and [owner's or operator's name] by
certified mail that we have decided not to
extend this letter  of credit beyond the cur-
rent expiration date. In the event you are so
notified, any  unused portion  of the credit
shall be available upon presentation of your
sight draft for 120  days after the date  of re-
ceipt by both you and [owner's or operator's
name],  as  shown  on  the  signed  return
receipts.
  Whenever this letter of credit is drawn on
under and  in compliance with the terms of
this credit, we shall duly honor such draft
upon presentation to us, and we shall deposit
the amount of the draft directly into the
standby trust fund of [owner's or operator's
name] in accordance with your instructions.
  We certify that the wording of this letter
of credit is identical to the  wording specified
in 40 CFR  144.70(d) as such regulations were
constituted on the date shown immediately
below.
[Signature(s)  and  title(s)  of  official(s) of
issuing institution]
[Date]
  This  credit is subject to  [insert "the most
recent  edition of the Uniform Customs and
Practice for Documentary Credits, published
and copyrighted by the International Cham-
ber of Commerce," or "the Uniform Commer-
cial Code"].

  (e) A certificate of insurance, as  spec-
ified in §144.63(e) of this chapter, must
be worded as  follows,  except  that  in-
structions in  brackets  are to  be  re-
placed with the  relevant  information
and the brackets deleted:

  Certificate of  Insurance  for Plugging and
Abandonment
  Name and Address of Insurer (herein callec
the "insurer"):
  Name and Address of Insurer (herein callec
the "insurer"):

  Injection Wells covered: [list for each well
The EPA Identification  Number, name, ad-
dress, and the amount of insurance for plug
ging and abandonment (these amounts for al
                                         672

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                  §144.70
injection wells covered  must total the face
amount shown below).]
Face Amount:	
Policy Number:	
Effective Date:	
  The  insurer  hereby certifies  that  it  has
issued to the Insured the policy  of insurance
identified above  to provide financial assur-
ance for plugging and abandonment for the
injection wells identified above.  The Insurer
further warrants that such policy conforms
in all  respects with the requirements of 40
CFR 144.63(e), as applicable and as such regu-
lations were constituted on the date shown
immediately below.  It  is  agreed  that any
provision of the policy  inconsistent  with
such regulations  is hereby amended to elimi-
nate such inconsistency.
  Whenever requested by the EPA Regional
Administrator(s)  of the  U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, the Insurer agrees to fur-
nish to the EPA Regional Administrator(s) a
duplicate original of the policy listed above,
including all endorsements thereon.
  I hereby certify  that  the wording of this
certificate is identical to the wording speci-
fied in 40 CFR 144.70(e)  as such regulations
were constituted on the date  shown  imme-
diately below.
[Authorized signature of Insurer]
[Name of person signing]
[Title of person signing]
  [Signature of witness or notary:]
[Date]

  (f) A  letter from the  chief financial
officer,  as specified in §144.63(f)  of this
chapter, must be worded as follows,  ex-
cept that  instructions in brackets are
to be replaced with the  relevant infor-
mation  and the brackets deleted:

   LETTER FROM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  [Address  to   Regional Administrator  of
every  Region in which injection  wells  for
which financial responsibility is to be dem-
onstrated through  the financial  test  are
located.]
  I  am the  chief financial  officer of [name
and address of firm.] This letter is in support
of this firm's  use  of the  financial  test  to
demonstrate financial assurance, as specified
in subpart F of 40 CFR part  144.
  [Fill out the  following four paragraphs re-
garding injection wells  and associated cost
estimates. If your firm has no injection wells
that belong in  a particular paragraph, write
"None" in the space indicated. For each injec-
tion  well,  include  its  EPA  Identification
Number,   name,  address, and  current plug-
ging and abandonment cost  estimate.]
  1. This firm is the owner or operator of the
following injection wells for which financial
assurance for plugging and abandonment is
demonstrated   through  the  financial test
specified in subpart F of 40 CFR part 144. The
current plugging and abandonment cost esti-
mate covered by the test is shown for each
injection well:	.
  2.  This firm guarantees, through the cor-
porate guarantee specified in subpart F of 40
CFR part 144, the plugging and abandonment
of the following injection wells owned or op-
erated by subsidaries of this firm. The cur-
rent cost estimate for plugging and abandon-
ment so guaranteed is shown for each injec-
tion well:	.
  3  In  States  where  EPA is not  admin-
istering the  financial requirements  of sub-
part F of 40 CFR part 144, this firm, as owner
or operator or guarantor, is demonstrating
financial  assurance for the  plugging  and
abandoment  of the following' injection wells
through the use of a test equivalent or sub-
stantially  equivalent to the financial  test
specified in subpart F of 40 CFR part 144. The
current plugging and abandonment cost esti-
mate covered by such  a test is  shown for
each injection well.	.
  4. This firm is the owner or operator of the
following injection wells for which financial
assurance for plugging and abandonment is
not  demonstrated either to EPA or a State
through the  financial test  or any other fi-
nancial  assurance mechanism specified  in
subpart F of 40 CFR part 144 or equivalent or
substantially equivalent State  mechanisms.
The  current plugging and abandonment cost
estimate not covered by such financial assur-
ance is shown for each injection well:	.
  This firm [insert "is required" or "is not re-
quired"] to file a Form 10K with the Securi-
ties  and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the
latest fiscal year.
  The  fiscal  year  of   this firm  ends  on
[month, day]. The figures for  the  following
items marked with an asterisk are  derived
from this firm's  independently audited, year-
end financial statements for the latest com-
pleted fiscal year, ended [date].
  [Fill in Alternative I if the criteria of para-
graph (f)(l)(i) of §144.63 of this chapter are
used. Fill in  Alternative II if the criteria of
paragraph (f)(l)(ii) of § 144 63 of this chapter
are used.]

              ALTERNATIVE I
1  (a) Current plugging and abandonment cost    $	
   (b) Sum of the  company's financial  re-
     sponsibilities under 40 CFR Parts 264
     and 265 Subpart H, currently met using
     the financial test or corporate guarantee
   (c) Total of lines a and b
*2  Total liabilities [if any portion of the plug-
 ging and abandonment cost  is included in
 total liabilities, you may deduct the amount
 of that portion  from this line and add that
 amount to lines  3 and 4]  .
*3 Tangible net worth
*4 Net worth
*5 Current assets
*6 Current liabilities
*7 Net working capital [line 5 minus line 6]
                                          673

-------
§144.70
          ALTERNATIVE I—Continued
*8  The sum of net income plus depreciation,
 depletion and amortization     	
*9  Total assets in U S (required only if less
 than 90% of firm's assets  are located in
 US.)

                            Yes
10 Is line 3 at least $10 million'
11 Is line 3 at least 6 times line
  KO)'             .
12 Is line 7 at least 6 times line
  1(c)'
"13 Are at least 90% of firm's as-
  sets located in the U S.' If not,
  complete line 14
14 Is line 9 at least 6 times line
  1(0?  ....
15 Is line 2 divided by line 4 less
  than 20'     .  .
16 Is  line 8  divided  by  line 2
  greater than 01?..
17 Is  line 5  divided  by  line 6
  greater than 15'.         .
               ALTERNATIVE II
1  (a) Current plugging and abandonment cost
   (b) Sum of the company's financial  re-
     sponsibilities under  40 CFR Parts 264
     and 265, Subpart H, currently met using
     the financial test or corporate guarantee
   (c) Total of lines a and b
2 Current bond rating of most recent issuance
  of this firm and name of rating service
3 Date of issuance of bond .  ,
4 Date of maturity of bond
*5 Tangible net worth  [if  any portion of the
  plugging and abandonment cost estimate  is
  included in "total liabilities" on your firm's fi-
  nancial statements, you may add the amount
  of that portion to this line] .
*6 Total assets in U S (required only if less
  than  90% of  firm's assets are located  in
  US)	

                               Yes
                                          No
                                          No
7 Is line 5 at least $10 million'
8 Is line 5 at least 6 times line
  1(0'
*9 Are at least 90% of the firm's
  assets located  in  the US' If
  not, complete line 10  	
10 Is line 6 at least 6 times line
  1(0'  . .

  I hereby certify that the wording of this
letter is identical to the wording specified in
40 CFR 144.70(f) as such regulations were con-
stituted  on  the  date  shown  immediately
below.
[Signature]
[Name]
[Title]
[Date]

  (g) A corporate guarantee as specified
in §144.63(e) must be worded as follows
except  that instructions in brackets
are to be replaced with the relevant in-
formation and the bracketed material
deleted:
            40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)

GUARANTEE FOR PLUGGING AND ABANDONMENT

  Guarantee made  this 	  day  of 	,
19	, by  [name  of guaranteeing  entity], a
business corporation  organized under  the
laws of the State of	, herein referred
to as guarantor, to the United States Envi-
ronmental  Protection Agency  (EPA), obli-
gee, on behalf of our subsidiary [owner or op-
erator] of [business address].
Recitals
  1. Guarantor meets or exceeds the financial
test criteria and agrees to comply with  the
reporting  requirements for guarantors  as
specified in 40 CFR 144.63(e).
  2. [Owner or operator] owns or operates the
following Class I hazardous waste injection
well covered by this guarantee: [List for each
facility: EPA Identification Number, name,
and address. Indicate for each whether guar-
antee  is for closure,  post-closure care,  or
both.]
  3.  "Plugging  and  abandonment  plan"  as
used below refers to the plans maintained as
required by 40 CFR part 144 for the plugging
and abandonment of injection  wells as iden-
tified above.
  4. For value received from [owner or oper-
ator],  guarantor guarantees to EPA that in
the event  that [owner or operator]  fails to
perform ["plugging and abandonment"] of the
above  facility(ies)  in accordance  with  the
plugging and abandonment plan and other
requirements when  required  to do  so,  the
guarantor  will do so or fund a trust fund as
specified in 40 CFR 144.63 in the name of
[owner or operator] in the amount  of the ad-
justed plugging and abandonment  cost esti-
mates prepared as specified in  40 CFR 144.62.
  5. Guarantor  agrees that, if  at the end of
any fiscal  year before termination of this
guarantee, the guarantor fails to meet the fi-
nancial test criteria,  guarantor  will send
within 90 days, by  certified mail,  notice to
the EPA  Regional  Administrator(s) for  the
Region(s) in which the facility(ies)  is (are)
located and to [owner or operator]  that he
intends to provide alternate financial assur-
ance as specified in 40 CFR 144.63 in the name
of [owner or operator]. Within 30 days after
sending such notice, the guarantor  will  es-
tablish such financial  assurance if [owner or
operator] has not done so.
  6. The guarantor agrees to notify  the  Re-
gional Administrator, by certified  mail, of a
voluntary  or involuntary case under Title 11,
U.S Code, naming guarantor as debtor, with-
in 10 days after its commencement.
  7.  Guarantor agrees that  within  30 days
after being notified by an EPA Regional  Ad-
ministrator of a determination that guar-
antor no longer meets the financial test  cri-
teria  or  that  he  is  disallowed  from  con-
tinuing  as  a  guarantor  of   plugging  and
adandonment, he will establish alternate fi-
nancial assurance,  as  specified in  40 CFR
                                            674

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §144.80
144.63, In the name of [owner or operator] if
[owner or operator] has not done so.
  8. Guarantor agrees to remain bound under
this guarantee notwithstanding any or all of
the following: amendment or modification of
the plugging and abandonment plan, the ex-
tension or reduction of the time of perform-
ance of plugging  and abandonment or any
other modification or alteration of an obli-
gation of [owner or operator] pursuant to 40
CFR part 144
  9. Guarantor agrees to remain bound under
this guarantee for so long as [owner or oper-
ator] must comply with the applicable finan-
cial assurance requirements of 40 CPR part
144 for the above-listed facilities, except that
guarantor may cancel  this guarantee  by
sending notice by certified mail, to the EPA
Regional Administrator(s) for the Region(s)
in which the facility(ies) is (are) located and
to [owner or operator], such cancellation to
become effective no earlier  than 120 days
after actual receipt of such notice by both
EPA and [owner or operator] as evidenced by
the return receipts.
  10. Guarantor agrees that if [owner or oper-
ator] fails to provide alternate financial as-
surance and obtain written approval of such
assurance from  the EPA Regional Admims-
trator(s) within 90 days after a notice of can-
cellation by the guarantor is  received by
both the EPA Regional Administrator(s) and
[owner or operator], guarantor will  provide
alternate financial assurance as specified in
40 CPR 144.63 in the name of [owner or  oper-
ator].
  11. Guarantor expressly waives notice of
acceptance  of this guarantee by the EPA or
by  [owner or  operator]. Guarantor also ex-
pressly  waives  notice  of amendments  or
modifications of the plugging and abandon-
ment plan.
  I hereby certify that the wording of this
guarantee is identical to the  wording speci-
fied in 40 CFR 144 70(f).
  Effective date:	.
[Name of guarantor]
[Authorized signature for guarantor]
[Type name of person signing]
[Title of person signing]
  Signature of witness or notary:	
[48  FR 14189, Apr.  1, 1983,  as amended at 59
FR 29959, June 10, 1994]

Subpart     G—Requirements    for
    Owners  and   Operators   of
    Class V Injection Wells


  SOURCE: 64 FR 68566, Dec 7,  1999, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 144.79  General.

  This subpart tells  you what require-
ments apply if you  own or operate  a
Class V injection well. You may also be
required  to  follow additional require-
ments listed in the rest  of this part.
Where they  may apply, these other re-
quirements  are referenced rather than
repeated. The  requirements  described
in this subpart and elsewhere in this
part   are   to   protect   underground
sources of drinking water and are part
of the Underground Injection Control
(UIC)  Program  established  under  the
Safe Drinking Water Act. This subpart
is written in a special format to make
it easier  to  understand the regulatory
requirements. Like other EPA regula-
tions,  it  establishes enforceable legal
requirements.

   DEFINITION OF CLASS V INJECTION
                WELLS

§144.80  What  is  a  Class V injection
    well?
  As described in § 144.6, injection wells
are classified as follows:
  (a) Class I. (1) Wells used by genera-
tors of hazardous  waste  or  owners  or
operators of hazardous waste  manage-
ment  facilities to  inject  hazardous
waste  beneath the  lowermost forma-
tion  containing,  within one-quarter
mile of the  well bore, an underground
source of drinking  water.
  (2)  Other  industrial and  municipal
disposal   wells  which  inject  fluids  be-
neath  the lowermost  formation  con-
taining, within one quarter mile of the
well bore, an  underground  source  of
drinking  water;
  (3) Radioactive  waste  disposal  wells
which  inject fluids  below the lower-
most formation containing  an under-
ground source of drinking water within
one quarter mile of the well bore.
  (b) Class II. Wells which inject fluids:
  (1) Which  are brought  to the surface
in connection with natural gas storage
operations, or conventional oil or nat-
ural gas  production  and  may be  com-
mingled   with waste waters  from gas
plants which are  an  integral part  of
production operations,  unless those wa-
ters are classified as a  hazardous waste
at the time of injection.
  (2) For  enhanced recovery  of  oil  or
natural gas;  and
  (3)  For  storage  of   hydrocarbons
which  are liquid at standard tempera-
ture and pressure.
                                      675

-------
§144.81
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (c) Class HI. Wells which inject fluids
for extraction of minerals including:
  (1) Mining of sulfur by the  Frasch
process;
  (2) In situ production of uranium or
other metals;  this  category includes
only in situ production from ore bodies
which  have  not been conventionally
mined.  Solution  mining of  conven-
tional mines such as stopes leaching is
included in Class V.
  (3) Solution mining of salts  or pot-
ash.
  (d) Class IV. (1) Wells used by genera-
tors  of hazardous  waste or of radio-
active  waste,  by owners and operators
of hazardous waste management facili-
ties, or by owners or operators of radio-
active waste disposal sites to dispose of
hazardous waste or radioactive waste
into  a  formation  which within  one
quarter (Vi) mile of the well contains
an  underground source  of  drinking
water.
  (2) Wells used by generators  of haz-
ardous waste  or of radioactive waste,
by owners and operators of hazardous
waste  management  facilities,  or  by
owners  or  operators  of radioactive
waste disposal sites to dispose  of haz-
ardous  waste or  radioactive  waste
above  a formation  which within  one
quarter (Vi) mile of the well contains
an  underground source  of  drinking
water.
  (3) Wells used by generators  of haz-
ardous waste or owners or operators of
hazardous waste management facilities
to dispose of hazardous  waste, which
cannot  be classified under  paragraph
(a)(l) or (d)(l) and (2) of this  section
(e.g., wells used to dispose of hazardous
waste into or above a formation which
contains an aquifer which has been  ex-
empted pursuant to 40 CPR 146.04).
  (e) Class  V.  Injection wells  not  in-
cluded in Class I,  II,  III or IV. Typi-
cally, Class V wells are  shallow wells
used to  place a variety of fluids  di-
rectly below the land surface. However,
if the  fluids you place in the  ground
qualify as a hazardous waste under the
Resource  Conservation  and Recovery
Act (RCRA), your well is  either a Class
I or  Class IV  well,  not a Class  V well.
Examples of Class V wells are described
in §144.81.
§ 144.81 Does this subpart apply to me?
  This subpart  applies to you if you
own or operate  a  Class V well, for ex-
ample:
  (1) Air conditioning return flow wells
used to return to the supply aquifer the
water used for heating or cooling in a
heat pump;
  (2) Large  capacity  cesspools  includ-
ing multiple dwelling, community  or
regional  cesspools,  or  other devices
that  receive  sanitary   wastes,  con-
taining human excreta, which have  an
open bottom and sometimes perforated
sides.  The  UIC requirements do not
apply to single family residential cess-
pools nor to non-residential cesspools
which  receive  solely sanitary  waste
and have  the capacity to serve fewer
than 20 persons a day.
  (3) Cooling  water return  flow  wells
used to inject water previously used for
cooling;
  (4) Drainage wells used to drain sur-
face fluids,  primarily  storm  runoff,
into a subsurface formation;
  (5) Dry wells used for the injection of
wastes into a subsurface formation;
  (6) Recharge wells used to replenish
the water in an aquifer;
  (7) Salt water intrusion barrier wells
used to inject water into a fresh aqui-
fer to prevent  the intrusion of salt
water into the fresh water;
  (8) Sand  backfill and  other backfill
wells used to inject a mixture of water
and sand, mill tailings or other solids
into mined  out  portions  of  subsurface
mines whether what is injected is a ra-
dioactive waste  or not.
  (9) Septic  system wells  used to inject
the waste or effluent  from a multiple
dwelling, business establishment, com-
munity or regional business establish-
ment septic tank.  The  UIC  require-
ments do not apply to  single family
residential septic  system wells, nor to
non-residential  septic  system   wells
which  are used  solely for the disposal
of sanitary  waste and have  the capac-
ity to serve fewer than 20 persons a
day.
  (10)  Subsidence  control  wells (not
used for  the purpose of oil  or natural
gas production) used to inject fluids
into a non-oil or gas producing zone to
reduce or eliminate subsidence associ-
ated with the overdraft of fresh water;
                                     676

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.82
  (11) Injection wells associated with
the recovery of geothermal energy for
heating, aquaculture and production of
electric power;
  (12) Wells used for solution mining of
conventional  mines  such as   stopes
leaching;
  (13) Wells used to inject spent brine
into the same formation from which it
was   withdrawn  after  extraction  of
halogens or their salts;
  (14) Injection wells used in  experi-
mental technologies.
  (15) Injection wells used for  in situ
recovery of lignite, coal, tar sands, and
oil shale.
  (16) Motor  vehicle waste  disposal
wells that  receive  or  have  received
fluids from  vehicular repair or mainte-
nance activities, such as an auto body
repair shop, automotive  repair shop,
new and used car  dealership, specialty
repair  shop  (e.g.,  transmission  and
muffler  repair shop), or  any  facility
that  does any vehicular repair work.
Fluids disposed in  these wells may con-
tain  organic and  inorganic chemicals
in concentrations that exceed the max-
imum contaminant levels (MCLs) es-
tablished by  the  primary  drinking
water regulations (see 40 CFR part 141).
These fluids also may include waste pe-
troleum products and may contain con-
taminants,  such as  heavy metals  and
volatile  organic  compounds,   which
pose risks to human health.

[64 FR 68566,  Dec. 7, 1999, as amended at 67
FR 39593, June 7, 2002]

   REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CLASS V
           INJECTION WELLS

§ 144.82   What must  I do to protect un-
   derground   sources   of  drinking
   water?

  If  you own or operate  any  type of
Class V well, the regulations below re-
quire that you cannot allow movement
of fluid into USDWs that might cause
endangerment, you  must comply with
other Federal UIC requirements in 40
CFR  parts  144  through  147,  and you
must comply with any other measures
required by your  State or EPA  Re-
gional Office UIC  Program to protect
USDWs,  and you  must  properly close
your well when you are  through using
it. You  also must submit basic infor-
mation about your well, as described in
§144.83.
  (a)  Prohibition of fluid movement.  (1)
As  described in §144.12(a), your injec-
tion activity cannot allow the  move-
ment of fluid containing any contami-
nant  into  USDWs, if the  presence of
that contaminant may cause  a viola-
tion  of the primary drinking  water
standards under 40 CFR part 141, other
health based standards, or may  other-
wise adversely affect the health of per-
sons.  This prohibition applies to your
well construction, operation,  mainte-
nance, conversion, plugging, closure, or
any other injection activity.
  (2) If the Director of the UIC Pro-
gram in your State  or  EPA Region
learns that your injection activity may
endanger  USDWs, he or  she may re-
quire you  to close your well, require
you to get  a permit,  or require other
actions listed in §144.12(c), (d), or (e).
  (b)  Closure requirements.  You must
close  the  well in  a manner that com-
plies  with  the  above prohibition  of
fluid  movement. Also, you  must dis-
pose  or  otherwise manage  any soil,
gravel, sludge, liquids, or  other mate-
rials removed from or adjacent to your
well in accordance with all applicable
Federal,  State,  and  local regulations
and requirements.
  (c)  Other  requirements  in  Parts 144
through 147.  Beyond this  subpart, you
are subject to other UIC Program re-
quirements in 40 CFR parts 144 through
147. While most of the relevant require-
ments are  repeated  or referenced  in
this subpart for convenience, you need
to read these other parts to understand
the entire UIC Program.
  (d) Other State or EPA requirements. 40
CFR parts 144 through 147 define min-
imum Federal UIC requirements. EPA
Regional Offices administering the UIC
Program have the flexibility to  estab-
lish additional or more stringent re-
quirements based on the authorities in
parts 144 through  147,  if believed to be
necessary to protect USDWs.  States
can have their own  authorities  to es-
tablish additional or more stringent re-
quirements   if   needed   to   protect
USDWs. You must comply with these
additional requirements, if any exist in
your  area. Contact  the UIC  Program
Director in  your State or EPA Region
to learn more.
                                     677

-------
§144.83
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 144.83  Do I  need to  notify  anyone
    about my Class V injection well?
  Yes, you need  to  provide  basic "in-
ventory  information"  about your well
to the UIC Director, if you haven't al-
ready. You also need to provide  any ad-
ditional  information  that  your  UIC
Program Director requests  in  accord-
ance  with the provisions of the  UIC
regulations.
  (a) Inventory  requirements. Unless you
know you have already satisfied the in-
ventory  requirements  in  §144.26 that
were in effect prior to the issuance of
this Subpart  G, you  must give your
UIC Program Director certain informa-
tion about yourself and your injection
operation.

  NOTE: This information is requested on na-
tional form "Inventory of Injection Wells,"
OMB No. 2040-0042.

  (1) The requirements differ depending
on your well status and location, as de-
scribed in the following table:
If your well is
(i) New (prior to construction of your well)
(n) Existing (construction underway or
completed)
And you're in one of these locations
("Primacy" States, where the State runs
the Class V UIC Program) Alabama, Ar-
kansas, Commonwealth of Northern
Mariana Islands, Connecticut, Delaware,
Florida, Georgia, Guam, Idaho, Illinois,
Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico, North Caro-
lina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Or-
egon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South
Carolina, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Wash-
ington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, or Wy-
oming
then you must contact your State
UIC Program to determine what you
must submit and by when
. then you must contact your State
UIC Program to determine what you
must submit and by when
Or you're in one of these locations ("Di-
rect Implementation" or Dl Programs,
where EPA runs the Class V UIC Pro-
gram) Alaska, Amencan Samoa, An-
zona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Indi-
ana, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, Min-
nesota, Montana, New York, Pennsyl-
vania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vir-
ginia, Virgin Islands, Washington, DC, or
any Indian Country
then you must submit the inventory
information described in (a)(2) of this
section prior to constructing your well.
then you must cease injection and
submit the inventory information. You
may resume injection 90 days after
you submit the information unless the
UIC Program Director notifies you that
injection may not resume or may re-
sume sooner
  (2) If your well is in a Primacy State
or a DI Program State, here is the in-
formation you must submit:
  (i) No  matter what type of Class V
well you own or operate, you must sub-
mit  at least the following information
for each Class V well: facility name and
location;  name and  address  of  legal
contact;  ownership of  facility: nature
and  type of injection well(s); and oper-
ating status of injection well(s).
  (ii) Additional information. If you are
in a Direct Implementation State and
you  own or operate a well listed below
you  must also provide  the information
listed in paragraph (a) (2)  (ill) as fol-
lows:
  (A) Sand or  other  backfill wells (40
CFR 144.81(8)  and  146.5(e)(8)  of  this
chapter);
  (B) Geothermal energy recovery wells
(40 CFR 144.81(11)  and  146.5  (e)(12)  of
this  chapter);
  (C)  Brine return flow wells (40 CFR
144.81(13) and 146.5 (e)(14) of this chap-
ter);
  (D)  Wells used in experimental tech-
nology  (40 CFR  144.81(14)  and  146.5
(e)(15) of this chapter);
  (E)  Municipal and industrial disposal
wells  other than Class I; and
  (F)  Any  other Class  V wells at the
discretion  of  the Regional  Adminis-
trator.
  (iii) You  must  provide a  list of all
wells  owned or operated along with the
following information for each well. (A
single description  of wells  at a single
facility  with  substantially the same
characteristics is acceptable).
  (A)  Location of each well or project
given by  Township, Range,  Section,
and Quarter-Section, or by latitude and
longitude  to  the  nearest second, ac-
cording to  the  conventional practice in
your State;
  (B)  Date  of completion of each well;
                                     678

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.84
  (C)  Identification and depth of the
underground formation(s)  into which
each well is injecting;
  (D) Total depth of each well;
  (E) Construction  narrative and sche-
matic  (both plan view and cross-sec-
tional drawings);
  (F) Nature of the injected fluids;
  (G) Average and maximum injection
pressure at the wellhead;
  (H) Average and maximum injection
rate; and
  (I) Date of the last inspection.
  (3) Regardless of whether your well is
in a Primacy State or DI Program you
are responsible for  knowing about, un-
derstanding, and complying with these
inventory requirements.
  (b) Information in response to  requests.
If you are  in one of the DI Programs
listed in the table above, the UIC Pro-
gram Director may require you to sub-
mit other   information  believed  nec-
essary to protect underground sources
of drinking water.
  (1)  Such  information requirements
may include, but are not limited to:
  (i) Perform ground water monitoring
and periodically submit  your moni-
toring results;
  (ii) Analyze the fluids you inject and
periodically submit the results of your
analyses;
  (iii)  Describe  the  geologic  layers
through which and into which  you are
injecting; and
  (iv) Conduct  other analyses and sub-
mit other  information, if needed  to
protect underground sources of drink-
ing water.
  (2) If the  Director requires this other
information, he or she will request it
from you in writing, along with a brief
statement  on why  the information is
required. This written notification also
will tell you when to submit the infor-
mation.
  (3) You  are  prohibited  from  using
your injection  well if  you  fail  to com-
ply with the written request within the
time frame specified. You can start in-
jecting  again only if you receive a per-
mit.

§ 144.84  Do I need to get a permit?
  No,  unless you fall within an excep-
tion described below:
  (a) General authorization by rule. With
certain exceptions  listed in paragraph
(b) of this section,  your Class V injec-
tion activity  is "authorized by rule,"
meaning- you have  to  comply with all
the requirements of this subpart and
the rest of  the UIC Program but you
don't have to get an individual permit.
Well authorization  expires  once you
have properly closed your well, as de-
scribed in §144.82(b).
  (b) Circumstances  in  Which Permits or
other Actions  are Required.  If  you fit
into one of the categories listed below,
your Class V well is no longer author-
ized by rule. This means that you have
to either get a permit  or close your in-
jection well. You can  find out by con-
tacting the  UIC  Program Director in
your State or EPA Region if this is the
case. Subpart  D of this Part tells you
how to apply for a permit and describes
other aspects  of  the permitting proc-
ess.  Subpart E  of  this  Part outlines
some of the  requirements that apply to
you if you get  a permit.
  (1) You fail to comply with the prohi-
bition  of fluid movement  standard in
§144.12(a) and described in §144.82(a) (in
which  case,  you have  to get a permit,
close your  well, and/or comply with
other  conditions  determined  by  the
UIC Program Director  in your State or
EPA Region);
  (2) You own or  operate  a Class V
large-capacity cesspool (in which case,
you must close your well as specified in
the additional requirements below) or a
Class V  motor vehicle waste disposal
well in a ground water protection area
or  sensitive  ground  water area  (in
which case,  you must either close your
well or get a permit as specified in the
additional requirements in  this  sub-
section). New  motor vehicle waste dis-
posal wells  and new cesspools are pro-
hibited as of April 5, 2000;
  (3) You are  specifically required by
the  UIC  Program  Director  in your
State or EPA Region  to get a  permit
(in which case, rule authorization  ex-
pires upon the effective date of the per-
mit issued,  or you are prohibited from
injecting into your well upon:
  (i) Failure to submit a permit appli-
cation  in a  timely manner as specified
in a notice from the Director; or
  (ii) Upon the effective date of permit
denial);
  (4) You have failed to submit inven-
tory information to your UIC Program
                                    679

-------
§144.85
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Director, as described in §144.83(a) (in
which case, you are prohibited from in-
jecting into your well until you comply
with the inventory requirements); or
  (5) If you are in a DI State and you
received a request from your UIC Pro-
gram Director for additional informa-
tion under §144.83(b), and have failed to
comply  with the request in a  timely
manner (in which case, you are prohib-
ited from injecting' into your well until
you get  a permit).

ADDITIONAL  REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS
  V  LARGE-CAPACITY  CESSPOOLS  AND
  MOTOR  VEHICLE   WASTE   DISPOSAL
  WELLS

§ 144.85  Do these additional require-
    ments apply to me?
  (a) Large-Capacity  Cesspools. The ad-
ditional requirements apply to all new
and  existing  large-capacity  cesspools
regardless of their location. If you are
using a  septic system for these type of
wastes you are not subject to the addi-
tional requirements in this subpart.
  (b) Motor Vehicle Waste Disposal Wells
Existing on April 5, 2000.  If you  have a
Class V motor vehicle waste disposal
well these requirements apply to you if
your well is located in a ground water
protection   area or  other   sensitive
ground water area that is identified by
your  State or  EPA Region. If your
State or EPA Region  fails to identify
ground  water protection areas  and/or
other sensitive ground  water  areas
these requirements apply to all Class V
motor vehicle wells in the State.
  (c) New Motor Vehicle Waste Disposal
Wells.  The  additional   requirements
apply to all  new motor vehicle waste
disposal wells as of April 5, 2000.

§144.86  What  are   the  definitions  I
    need to know?
  (a) State Drinking Water Source Assess-
ment and Protection Program. This is a
new approach  to protecting drinking
water sources,  specified in  the  1996
Amendments  to the  Safe  Drinking
Water Act at Section 1453. States must
prepare  and submit for EPA approval a
program that sets out how States will
conduct local  assessments,  including:
delineating  the  boundaries   of areas
providing  source  waters for  public
water systems; identifying significant
potential  sources  of contaminants in
such areas; and determining the sus-
ceptibility of public water  systems in
the delineated areas to the inventoried
sources of contamination.
  (b) Complete Local Source Water Assess-
ment for Ground Water Protection Areas.
When  EPA  has  approved   a   State's
Drinking Water Source Assessment and
Protection Program; States will begin
to conduct local assessments for  each
public water system in their State. For
the purposes of this rule, local  assess-
ments  for community  water systems
and non-transient  non-community sys-
tems are complete when four require-
ments are met: First, a State must de-
lineate  the boundaries  of  the  assess-
ment area for  community and  non-
transient  non-community  water  sys-
tems. Second, the State must identify
significant potential sources of  con-
tamination in  these  delineated areas.
Third,  the State must "determine the
susceptibility of community and  non-
transient  non-community  water  sys-
tems in  the delineated area to  such
contaminants." Lastly, each State will
develop its own plan for making the
completed assessments available to the
public.
  (c) Ground Water  Protection Area. A
ground water protection area is a geo-
graphic area near and/or surrounding
community  and  non-transient  non-
community water systems that  use
ground water as a source of drinking
water.  These areas receive priority for
the protection of  drinking  water sup-
plies and  States are required to delin-
eate and assess these areas under sec-
tion 1453  of  the Safe Drinking Water
Act. The additional requirements in
§144.88 apply  to you if your Class V
motor vehicle waste disposal well  is in
a ground water protection area for ei-
ther a community water system  or  a
non-transient  non-community  water
system, in many  States,  these areas
will  be  the same  as Wellhead Protec-
tion Areas that have been or will be de-
lineated  as defined in section  1428 of
the SDWA.
  (d) Community Water System.  A com-
munity water system is  a public water
system that  serves at least 15  service
connections  used  by year-round  resi-
dents or regularly serves at least 25
year-round residents.
                                    680

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §144.87
  (e) Non-transient Non-community Water
System. A public water system that is
not  a community  water  system  and
that regularly serves at least 25 of the
same people over six months a year.
These may include  systems that pro-
vide water to schools, day care centers,
government/military    installations,
manufacturers,  hospitals  or  nursing
homes, office buildings, and  other fa-
cilities.
  (f) Delineation. Once a State's Drink-
ing Water Source Assessment and Pro-
tection  Program  is  approved,   the
States  will  begin  delineating their
local assessment areas.  Delineation is
the first step in the assessment process
in  which  the  boundaries  of  ground
water protection areas are identified.
  (g)   Other   Sensitive  Ground  Water
Areas. States may  also  identify other
areas  in the  State  in addition  to
ground water protection areas that are
critical  to  protecting  underground
sources  of drinking  water from  con-
tamination.   These  other   sensitive
ground water areas  may include areas
such  as areas  overlying  sole-source
aquifers;  highly productive   aquifers
supplying  private   wells;   continuous
and   highly   productive  aquifers  at
points distant from public water supply
wells:  areas  where  water  supply
aquifers  are  recharged;  karst aquifers
that  discharge  to   surface  reservoirs
serving as public water supplies; vul-
nerable or  sensitive hydrogeologic  set-
tings, such as glacial outwash deposits,
eolian sands, and  fractured  volcanic
rock; and areas of  special concern se-
lected based on a combination of fac-
tors,  such as hydrogeologic sensitivity,
depth to ground water, significance as
a drinking water source, and prevailing
land-use practices.

§ 144.87  How does the identification of
    ground water protection areas and
    other sensitive ground water areas
    affect me?
  (a)  You are subject to these new re-
quirements  if you  own  or  operate an
existing motor vehicle well and you are
located in  a ground water protection
area or an other sensitive ground water
area. If your State or EPA Region fails
to identify these areas within the spec-
ified  time  frames these requirements
apply  to all existing motor vehicle
waste disposal wells within your State.
  (b) Ground Water Protection Areas. (1)
For the purpose of this subpart, States
are  required to  complete  all  local
source water assessments for ground
water  protection areas by January  1,
2004.  Once  a local assessment  for  a
ground water protection  area is com-
plete  every existing  motor  vehicle
waste  disposal  well  owner  in  that
ground water protection  area  has  one
year to close the well or receive a per-
mit. If a State fails to  complete all
local assessments for ground water pro-
tection areas by January 1,  2004.  the
following may occur:
  (i) The new requirements in this sub-
part will apply to all existing motor
vehicle waste  disposal wells in  the
State  and  owners  and  operators  of
motor vehicle waste disposal wells lo-
cated outside of completed assessments
for ground water protection areas must
close their well  or  receive a permit by
January  1, 2005.
  (ii) EPA may grant a State an exten-
sion for up to one year from the Janu-
ary 1, 2004 deadline if the State is mak-
ing reasonable progress in completing
the  source  water  assessments  for
ground water protection  areas. States
must apply for the extension by June  1,
2003. If a State fails to complete the as-
sessments  for  the  remaining ground
water protection areas by the extended
date the rule requirements will  apply
to all motor vehicle  waste  disposal
wells in the State and owners and oper-
ators of  motor  vehicle waste  disposal
wells located outside of ground water
protection areas  with completed  as-
sessments must close their well or re-
ceive a permit by January 1, 2006.
  (2) The UIC Program Director  may
extend the compliance deadline for spe-
cific motor vehicle waste disposal wells
for up to one year if the most efficient
compliance  option  for the well is con-
nection to a sanitary sewer or installa-
tion of new treatment technology.
  (c)  Other  Sensitive  Ground  Water
Areas.  States may also delineate other
sensitive ground water areas by Janu-
ary  1, 2004. Existing  motor  vehicle
waste disposal well owners and opera-
tors   within other  sensitive  ground
water areas have until January 1, 2007
to receive a permit or close the well.  If
                                     681

-------
§144.87
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
a State or EPA Region fails to identify
these additional sensitive ground water
areas by January 1,  2004, the new re-
quirements of this rule will apply to all
motor vehicle waste  disposal  wells in
the State effective January 1, 2007 un-
less  they are  subject  to a  different
compliance date pursuant to paragraph
(b) of this section. Again, EPA may ex-
tend the January 1, 2004 deadline for up
to one year  for  States to  delineate
other sensitive  ground water areas if
the   State   is   making  reasonable
progress in identifying the  sensitive
areas. States must apply for this exten-
sion by June 1, 2003. If a State has been
granted an  extension,  existing motor
vehicle waste  disposal well owners and
operators within the sensitive ground
water areas have until January 1, 2008
to close the well  or  receive a permit.
unless they are subject  to a  different
compliance date pursuant to paragraph
(b) of this section. If a State  has been
granted an extension  and fails to delin-
eate sensitive  areas  by  the  extended
date,  the rule requirements will apply
to all  motor vehicle  waste   disposal
wells in the State  and owners and oper-
ators  have  until  January 1, 2008  to
close  the well or receive a permit, un-
less  they are  subject  to a  different
compliance date pursuant to paragraph
(b) of this section.
  (d) How to Find  Out if Your  Well is in
a Ground Water  Protection Area or Sen-
sitive Ground Water Area. States are re-
quired to make their local source water
assessments widely  available  to the
public through  a variety of  methods
after  the assessments are complete.
You can find out if your Class V well is
in a ground water protection area by
contacting the  State agency respon-
sible  for  the  State  Drinking Water
Source Assessment and Protection Pro-
gram  in your area. You may call the
Safe Drinking Water Hotline  at 1-800-
426-4791 to find out who to call in your
State for this information. The State
office responsible for  implementing the
Drinking Water  Source Assessment and
Protection Program  makes  the  final
and official determination of bound-
aries   for  ground  water  protection
areas.  Because  States that choose to
delineate other  sensitive  ground water
areas are also  required to make the in-
formation on these areas accessible to
the public, they may do so in a manner
similar to  the process  used  by  the
States in publicizing the EPA approved
Drinking Water Source Assessment and
Protection Program. You can find out
if your Class V well is in an other sen-
sitive ground water area by contacting
the State  or Federal agency  respon-
sible  for  the  Underground Injection
Control Program.  You  may  call  the
Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-
426-4791 to find  out who to call for in-
formation.
  (e) Changes in the Status of the EPA
Approved  State  Drinking  Water Source
Assessment  and  Protection  Program.
After January  1, 2004 your State may
assess  a ground water protection area
for ground water supplying a new com-
munity water  system or a new non-
transient  non-community  water sys-
tem that  includes your  Class V injec-
tion well.  Also, your  State may offi-
cially  re-delineate  the boundaries of a
previously  delineated  ground  water
protection area to include additional
areas that includes your motor vehicle
waste  disposal  well. This  would make
the additional regulations apply to you
if  your motor vehicle  waste  disposal
well is in  such an area. The additional
regulations start applying to you one
year after  the State  completes  the
local assessment for the ground water
protection area for the new  drinking
water system or the new re-delineated
area.  The  UIC  Program Director re-
sponsible for your area may extend this
deadline for up to one year if the most
efficient compliance option for  the well
is connection to a sanitary sewer or in-
stallation  of  new treatment  tech-
nology.
  (f) What Happens if My State Doesn 't
Designate  Other  Sensitive Ground Water
Areas?  If  your  State  or EPA  Region
elects  not to  delineate the additional
sensitive ground water areas, the addi-
tional  regulations apply to you regard-
less of  the location of your well by Jan-
uary 1, 2007, or January 2008 if an ex-
tension has been granted as explained
in paragraph (c) of this section, except
for wells  in ground water protection
areas  which are  subject  to  different
compliance  deadlines   explained  in
paragraph (b) of this section.
  (g) [Reserved]
                                     682

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                                    §144.88
  (h) Application of Requirements Outside
of  Ground Water  Protection  Areas  and
Sensitive  Ground  Water Areas. EPA  ex-
pects and strongly  encourages  States
to  use  existing authorities  in the UIC
program   to   take  whatever  measures
are needed to ensure Class V wells  are
not endangering USDWs in  any other
areas   outside  of  delineated  ground
water   protection areas  and sensitive
ground  water  areas.  Such  measures
could  include,  if believed to be nec-
essary  by a UIC Program Director,  ap-
                plying   the   addilional   requirements
                below to other areas and/or other types
                of Class V wells. Therefore, the Direc-
                tor  may apply the additional  require-
                ments to  you,  even if you are not lo-
                cated in the areas  listed in paragraph
                (a) of this section.

                §144.88  What  are  the  additional  re-
                    quirements?
                  The   additional   requirements
                specified in the following tables:
                          are
      (a) TABLE 1—ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR URGE-CAPACITY CESSPOOLS STATEWIDE
                    [See § 144 85 to determine if these additional requirements apply to you]
           Well Status
                                           Requirement
                                                                           Deadline
        If your cesspool is
                                          Then you
                                                                            By
(1) Existing (operational  or under  con-
  struction by April 5, 2000)
(2) New or converted (construction  not
  started before April 5, 2000)
(i) Must close the well

(n) Must notify the UIC Program Director
 (both Primacy States and Direct Im-
 plementation States) of  your intent to
 close the well
Note  This information is  requested on
 national form "Preclosure Notification
 for Closure of Injection Wells,"
Are prohibited
April 5, 2005

At least 30 days pnor to closure
                                                                April 5, 2000
      (b) TABLE 2—ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE WASTE DISPOSAL WELLS
                    [See § 144 85 to determine if these additional requirements apply to you]
           Well status
                                           Requirement
                                                                           Deadline
 If your motor vehicle waste disposal well
                                            Then
                                                                            By
(1) Existing (operational  or under  con-
  struction by April 5, 2000)
(i) If your well is in a ground water pro-
 tection area, you must close the well
 or obtain a permit
Within 1 year of the completion of your
  local source water assessment, your
  UiC Program Director may extend the
  closure deadline,  but  not the permit
  application  deadline, for up to one
  year if the  most efficient compliance
  option is  connection  to a sanitary
  sewer or instaration of new treatment
  technology
                                (n) If your well is in an other sensitive
                                  ground water area, you must close the
                                  well or obtain a permit
                               By January 1, 2007, your UIC Program
                                 Director may extend the closure dead-
                                 line,  but not  the permit application
                                 deadline, for up to  one year if the
                                 most  efficient compliance  option  is
                                 connection to a sanitary sewer or in-
                                 stallation of new treatment technology
                                (in) If you plan to seek a waiver from the
                                  ban and apply for a permit, you must
                                  meet  MCLs at the point of injection
                                  while  your permit application is under
                                  review, if you choose to keep oper-
                                  ating your well
                               The date you submit your permit appli-
                                 cation
                                             683

-------
§144.89
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
    (b) TABLE 2—ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE WASTE DISPOSAL WELLS—
                                   Continued
                 jSee §144 85 to determine if these additional requirements apply to you]
Well status
If your motor vehicle waste disposal well
IS

(2) New or converted (construction not
started before April 5, 2000)
Requirement
Then
(iv) If you receive a permit, you must
comply with all permit conditions, if
you choose to keep operating your
well, including requirements to meet
MCLs and other health based stand-
ards at the point of injection, follow
best management practices, and mon-
itor your injectate and sludge quality
(v) If your well is in a State which has
not completed all their local assess-
ments by January 1 , 2004 or by the
extended date if your State has ob-
tained an extension as described in
14487, and you are outside an area
with a completed assessment you
must close the well or obtain a permit
(vi) If your well is in a State that has not
delineated other sensitive ground
water areas by January 1, 2004 and
you are outside of an area with a
completed assessment you mus* close
the well or obtain a permit regardless
of your location
fvn) If you plan to close your well, you
must notify the DIG Program Director
of your intent to close the well (this in-
cludes closing your well prior to con-
version)
Note This information is requested on
national form "Preclosure Notification
for Closure of Injection Wells"
Are prohibited
Deadline
By
The date(s) specified in your permit
January 1, 2005 unless your State ob-
tains an extension as described in
14487 (b) in which case your dead-
line is January 1, 2006, your UIC Pro-
gram Director may extend the closure
deadline, but not the permit applica-
tion deadline, for up to one year if the
most efficient compliance option is
connection to a sanitary sewer or in-
stallation of new treatment technology
January 1, 2007 unless your State ob-
tains an extension as described in
144 87(c) in which case your deadline
is January 2008
At least 30 days prior to closure
April 5, 2000
[64 FR 68566, Dec. 7, 1999. 64 FR 70316, Dec. 16, 1999]
§ 144.89  How do I close my Class V in-
   jection well?
  The  following  describes the require-
ments for closing your Class V injec-
tion well.
  (a)  Closure.  (1) Prior to  closing  a
Class  V  large-capacity  cesspool  or
motor vehicle waste disposal well,  you
must plug or otherwise close the well
in a  manner that  complies with  the
prohibition of fluid movement standard
in §144.12 and summarized in §144.82(a).
If the UIC Program Director in your
State  or EPA  Region  has any addi-
tional or more specific closure stand-
ards, you have to meet those standards
too.  You also  must dispose or other-
wise manage  any soil,  gravel, sludge,
liquids,  or other  materials  removed
from  or adjacent to your well in ac-
cordance with all applicable Federal,
State, and local regulations  and re-
quirements, as in §144.82(b).
  (2) Closure does not mean that you
need to cease operations at your facil-
ity, only that you need to close your
well.  A number of  alternatives  are
available for disposing of waste fluids.
Examples of alternatives that may be
available to motor vehicle stations in-
clude:  recycling  and  reusing  waste-
water  as much as possible:  collecting
and  recycling  petroleum-based fluids,
                                      684

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §145.1
coolants,  and battery  acids drained
from vehicles; washing parts in a self-
contained, recirculating  solvent sink,
with spent  solvents  being  recovered
and  replaced by the  supplier;  using
absorbents to clean up minor leaks and
spills,  and placing the used  materials
in approved  waste containers and dis-
posing of them properly; using  a  wet
vacuum or mop to pick up accumulated
rain or snow melt, and if allowed, con-
necting floor drains  to  a municipal
sewer  system or holding  tank, and if
allowed, disposing of the holding tank
contents  through  a  publicly owned
treatment works.  You should  check
with the  publicly  owned  treatment
works  you  might  use to  see if they
would  accept your wastes. Alternatives
that may be available to  owners  and
operators of a large-capacity cesspool
include: conversion to a septic system;
connection  to sewer;  and  installation
of an on-site treatment unit.
  (b) Conversions. In limited cases, the
UIC  Director may authorize the con-
version (reclassification) of a motor ve-
hicle waste  disposal  well to another
type of Class V well.  Motor vehicle
wells  may  only be  converted if:  all
motor  vehicle fluids are segregated by
physical  barriers and are not allowed
to enter  the well; and,  injection  of
motor  vehicle waste is unlikely based
on a facility's compliance  history and
records showing proper waste disposal.
The  use  of a semi-permanent plug  as
the  means  to segregate waste is not
sufficient to  convert  a motor vehicle
waste  disposal well to another type  of
Class V well.
[64 FR 68566, Dec. 7, 1999; 65 PR 5024, Feb. 2,
2000]

  PART 145—STATE UIC PROGRAM
           REQUIREMENTS

     Subpart A—General Program
             Requirements

Sec.
145.1  Purpose and scope.
145.2  Definitions.

   Subpart B—Requirements for State
              Programs

145.11 Requirements for permitting.
145.12 Requirements for compliance evalua-
   tion programs.
145.13  Requirements  for  enforcement  au-
   thority.
145.14  Sharing of information.

  Subpart C—State Program Submissions

145.21  General requirements for program ap-
   provals.
145.22  Elements of a program submission
145.23  Program description.
145.24  Attorney General's statement.
145.25  Memorandum of Agreement with the
   Regional Administrator.

  Subpart D—Program Approval, Revision
            and Withdrawal

145.31  Approval process.
145.32  Procedures for revision  of State pro-
   grams.
145.33  Criteria  for  withdrawal  of State pro-
   grams.
145.34  Procedures  for  withdrawal of State
   programs

         Subpart E—Indian Tribes

145.52  Requirements for Tribal eligibility.
145.56  Request  by an Indian Tribe for a de-
   termination of eligibility.
145.58  Procedure for processing  an Indian
   Tribe's application.

  AUTHORITY: 42 U.S.C. 300f et seg

  SOURCE: 48 FR 14202, Apr. 1, 1983, unless
otherwise noted.
   Subpart A—General Program
           Requirements

§ 145.1  Purpose and scope.
  (a) This part specifies the procedures
EPA will follow in approving, revising,
and withdrawing State programs under
section  1422  (underground  injection
control—UIC) of SDWA,  and includes
the elements which  must  be part  of
submissions  to  EPA  for program ap-
proval and the  substantive  provisions
which must  be present in State  pro-
grams for them to be approved.
  (b) State submissions for program ap-
proval  must  be made in  accordance
with the procedures set out  in subpart
C. This  includes  developing and  sub-
mitting to EPA a program description
(§145.23), an Attorney General's State-
ment (§145.24), and a  Memorandum  of
Agreement with the Regional Adminis-
trator (§145.25).
  (c) The substantive  provisions which
must be included in State programs  to
obtain  approval  include  requirements
                                     685

-------
§145.2
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
for permitting, compliance evaluation,
enforcement, public participation, and
sharing of  Information.  The  require-
ments are found in subpart B. Many of
the requirements for State programs
are made applicable to States by cross-
referencing  other EPA regulations. In
particular, many of the  provisions of
parts 144 and 124 are made applicable to
States by the references contained in
§145.11.
  (d)  Upon  submission of  a  complete
program,  EPA will  conduct  a  public
hearing, if interest is shown, and deter-
mine  whether to  approve or disapprove
the program taking into consideration
the requirements of this part, the Safe
Drinking Water Act and any comments
received.
  (e) Upon approval of a State program,
the Administrator  shall  suspend the
issuance of Federal permits for those
activities subject to the approved State
program.
  (f) Any  State program  approved by
the Administrator shall at all times be
conducted in  accordance with the  re-
quirements of this part.
  (g)  Nothing in  this part  precludes a
State from:
  (1)  Adopting  or  enforcing  require-
ments which a>*e  more  stringent or
more  extensive  than  those  required
under this part;
  (2) Operating a program with a great-
er scope of coverage than that required
under this  part.  Where  an  approved
State program has  a greater scope of
coverage than required by Federal law
the additional coverage is not part of
the federally approved program.
  (h) Section 1451 of the SDWA author-
izes the Administrator to delegate pri-
mary  enforcement  responsibility  for
the  Underground   Injection  Control
Program to eligible Indian Tribes.  An
Indian Tribe must  establish  its eligi-
bility to be  treated as a State before it
is eligible to apply for Underground In-
jection Control grants and primary en-
forcement  responsibility.  All  require-
ments of parts 124, 144, 145, and 146 that
apply to States with UIC primary en-
forcement responsibility also apply to
Indian Tribes except where specifically
noted.
[48 PR 14202,  Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 53
PR 37412, Sept. 26, 1988; 59 FR 64345, Dec. 14,
1994]
§ 145.2 Definitions.
  The definitions  of part 144 apply to
all subparts of this part.

Subpart B—Requirements for State
             Programs

§ 145.11  Requirements for permitting.
  (a)  All  State programs  under  this
part must have legal authority to im-
plement  each  of  the following provi-
sions and must be administered in con-
formance with  each; except  that States
are  not  precluded from omitting or
modifying  any provisions  to  impose
more stringent requirements.
  (1) Section 144.5(b)—(Confidential in-
formation);
  (2)  Section  144.6—(Classification of
infection wells);
  (3)  Section  144.7—(Identification of
underground sources of drinking water
and exempted aquifers);
  (4) Section 144.8—(Noncompliance re-
porting);
  (5) Section 144.11—(Prohibition of un-
authorized injection);
  (6)  Section  144.12—(Prohibition of
movement of fluids into underground
sources of drinking water);
  (7)  Section  144.13—(Elimination of
Class IV wells);
  (8) Section 144.14—(Requirements for
wells managing hazardous waste);
  (9) Sections 144.21-144.26—(Authoriza-
tion by rule);
  (10) Section 144.31—(Application for a
permit);
  (11) Section 144.32—(Signatories);
  (12) Section 144.33—(Area Permits);
  (13) Section  144.34—(Emergency  per-
mits);
  (14) Section 144.35—(Effect of permit);
  (15) Section 144.36—(Duration);
  (16) Section 144.38—(Permit transfer);
  (17) Section 144.39—(Permit modifica-
tion);
  (18)  Section   144.40—(Permit termi-
nation);
  (19) Section  144.51—(Applicable  per-
mit conditions);
  (20) Section 144.52—(Establishing per-
mit conditions);
  (21) Section   144.53(a)—(Schedule of
compliance);
  (22) Section  144.54—(Monitoring  re-
quirements);
  (23) Section  144.55—(Corrective  Ac-
tion);
                                     686

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §145.12
  (24) Section 124.3(a)—(Application for
a permit);
  (25) Section 124.5 (a), (c), (d), and (f)—
(Modification of permits);
  (26) Section 124.6 (a), (c), (d), and (e)—
(Draft Permit);
  (27) Section 124.8—(Fact sheets);
  (28) Section 124.10 (a)(l)(ii), (a)(l)(iii),
(a)(l)(v), (b),  (c), (d),  and (e)—(Public
notice);
  (29) Section 124.11—(Public comments
and requests for hearings);
  (30) Section 124.12(a)—(Public  hear-
ings); and
  (31) Section 124.17  (a)  and  (c)—(Re-
sponse to comments).
  (32) Section 144.88—(What are the ad-
ditional requirements?);
  (b)(l)  States need not implement pro-
visions  identical to the provisions list-
ed in paragraphs (a)(l) through  (a)(32)
of this section. Implemented provisions
must, however,  establish requirements
at  least  as  stringent   as  the cor-
responding   listed  provisions.   While
States may impose more stringent re-
quirements, they may not make one re-
quirement  more lenient  as a tradeoff
for making another requirement more
stringent;  for example,  by requiring
that public hearings be held prior to
issuing  any permit while reducing the
amount  of  advance notice of such  a
hearing.
  (2) State  programs may, if they have
adequate  legal  authority, implement
any  of the provisions  of parts 144  and
124.  See, for example §144.37(d) (con-
tinuation of permits)  and §124.4 (con-
solidation of permit processing).

[48 FR 14202,  Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 64
FR 78572, Dec 7, 1999]

§ 145.12   Requirements for compliance
   evaluation programs.
  (a) State programs shall have  proce-
dures for receipt, evaluation, retention
and investigation for possible enforce-
ment of all  notices and reports re-
quired of permittees and other  regu-
lated persons (and for investigation for
possible enforcement of failure to sub-
mit these notices and reports).
  (b) State  programs shall have inspec-
tion and surveillance procedures  to de-
termine, independent  of  information
supplied by regulated persons, compli-
ance or noncompliance with applicable
program requirements. The State shall
maintain:
  (1) A program which is capable of
making comprehensive surveys  of  all
facilities and activities subject to the
State Director's  authority to  identify
persons subject to regulation who have
failed to comply with permit  applica-
tion or  other program requirements.
Any compilation, index,  or inventory
of such facilities and activities shall be
made available to the Regional Admin-
istrator upon request;
  (2) A program for periodic inspections
of the  facilities and activities subject
to regulation. These inspections shall
be conducted in a manner designed  to:
  (i) Determine  compliance  or  non-
compliance  with issued permit condi-
tions and other program requirements;
  (ii) Verify the  accuracy of informa-
tion submitted by permittees and other
regulated persons in reporting  forms
and  other forms  supplying monitoring
data; and
  (iii) Verify the adequacy of sampling,
monitoring, and other methods used by
permittees and other regulated persons
to develop that information;
  (3) A program for investigating infor-
mation obtained regarding violations
of applicable program  and permit re-
quirements; and
  (4) Procedures  for receiving  and en-
suring proper con&ideration of informa-
tion submitted by the public about vio-
lations. Public effort in reporting vio-
lations  shall be encouraged  and  the
State Director shall  make available in-
formation on reporting procedures.
  (c) The State Director and State offi-
cers engaged in compliance evaluation
shall have authority to enter any site
or premises subject to regulation or in
which records relevant  to program op-
eration are  kept in  order to copy any
records, inspect,  monitor or otherwise
investigate   compliance  with  permit
conditions and other program require-
ments.  States whose  law requires  a
search warrant  before  entry conform
with this requirement.
  (d) Investigatory inspections  shall be
conducted,  samples shall  be taken and
other information shall be gathered in
a manner [e.g., using proper "chain of
custody" procedures] that will produce
evidence admissible  in an enforcement
proceeding or in court.
                                    687

-------
§145.13
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 145.13  Requirements for enforcement
    authority.
  (a) Any State agency administering a
program  shall have available the fol-
lowing remedies for violations of State
program requirements:
  (1) To restrain immediately  and ef-
fectively any person by order or by suit
in State court from  engaging in any
unauthorized activity which  is endan-
gering  or causing damage  to public
health or environment;
 NOTE: This paragraph requires that States
have a mechanism (e.g., an administrative
cease and desist order or the ability to seek
a temporary restraining order) to stop any
unauthorized  activity endangering public
health or the environment.
  (2) To sue in courts of competent ju-
risdiction to enjoin any threatened  or
continuing violation  of  any program
requirement, including  permit condi-
tions, without the necessity of a prior
revocation of the permit;
  (3) To  assess  or sue  to recover  in
court civil penalties and to seek crimi-
nal remedies,  including  fines, as fol-
lows:
  (i) For all  wells except Class II wells,
civil penalties shall be  recoverable for
any program violation  in at  least the
amount of $2,500 per  day. For Class II
wells, civil penalties  shall be recover-
able for  any program violation in  at
least the amount of $1,000 per day.
  (ii)  Criminal  fines  shall be recover-
able in at least the amount of $5,000 per
day against any person  who willfully
violates any program requirement,  or
for Class II wells, pipeline (production)
severance shall  be imposable  against
any person who willfully violates any
program requirement.
 NOTE:  In  many States the State Director
will be represented in State courts by the
State Attorney General or other appropriate
legal officer.  Although  the  State  Director
need not appear in court actions he or she
should have power to request that any of the
above actions be brought.
  (b)(l) The  maximum civil penalty  or
criminal fine (as provided in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section) shall  be assess-
able for each instance of violation and,
if  the violation is continuous, shall  be
assessable up to the maximum amount
for each day of violation.
  (2) The burden of proof and degree of
knowledge or  intent required under
State  law for  establishing  violations
under  paragraph (a)(3) of this section,
shall be no greater than the burden of
proof or degree of knowledge or intent
EPA must provide when it brings an
action under the  Safe Drinking Water
Act.
  NOTE: For example, this requirement is not
met if State law includes mental state as an
element of proof for civil violations.
  (c) A civil  penalty assessed,  sought,
or agreed upon by the State Director
under  paragraph  (a)(3) of  this  section
shall be appropriate to the violation.
  NOTE: To the extent that State judgments
or settlements provide penalties in amounts
which EPA believes to be substantially inad-
equate in comparison to the amounts  which
EPA would require under similar facts, EPA,
when authorized by  the applicable statute,
may commence separate  actions for pen-
alties.
  In  addition  to  the requirements of this
paragraph, the State may have other en-
forcement remedies.  The following enforce-
ment  options, while not mandatory,  are
highly recommended:
  Procedures for assessment by the State of
the  costs  of investigations, inspections, or
monitoring surveys which lead to the estab-
lishment of violations;
  Procedures which enable the State to as-
sess or to sue any persons responsible for un-
authorized activities for any  expenses in-
curred by the  State in removing, correcting,
or terminating any  adverse effects upon
human health and the environment resulting
from the unauthorized activity, or both; and
  Procedures for the administrative assess-
ment of penalties by the Director.
  (d) Any State administering a  pro-
gram shall provide for public participa-
tion in the State  enforcement  process
by providing either:
  (1) Authority which allows interven-
tion as of right in any civil or adminis-
trative action to obtain remedies speci-
fied in paragraph (a)  (1),  (2) or (3) of
this section by any citizen  having an
interest which is or may be adversely
affected;  or
  (2) Assurance that the State agency
or enforcement authority will:
  (i) Investigate  and  provide  written
responses to all citizen complaints sub-
mitted  pursuant  to  the  procedures
specified in § 145.12(b)(4);
  (ii) Not oppose  intervention  by any
citizen when permissive  intervention
may be authorized by statute, rale, or
regulation; and
                                      688

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §145.21
  (iii) Publish notice of and provide at
least 30 days for public  comment  on
any proposed settlement of a State en-
forcement action.
  (e) To  the extent that  an  Indian
Tribe does  not  assert or is  precluded
from asserting  criminal enforcement
authority  the  Administrator will as-
sume primary  enforcement  responsi-
bility   for  criminal  violations.  The
Memorandum of Agreement  in  §145.25
shall reflect a system where the Tribal
agency  will refer such violations to the
Administrator in an appropriate and
timely manner.

(Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), Safe
Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.),
Clean Air  Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), Re-
source Conservation and Recovery Act  (42
U.S.C. 6901 etseq.))
[48 PR 14202, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 48
PR 39621, Sept. 1, 1983; 53 PR 37412, Sept. 26,
1988]

§ 145.14  Sharing of information.
  (a) Any information obtained or used
in the  administration of a  State pro-
gram shall be available to  EPA upon
request without  restriction.  If the in-
formation has been  submitted to the
State under a claim of confidentiality,
the  State  must submit that claim to
EPA when providing information under
this section. Any information obtained
from a  State and subject to a claim of
confidentiality will be  treated  in ac-
cordance  with  the  regulations  in  40
CPR part 2.  If  EPA obtains from a
State information that is not claimed
to be confidential, EPA may make that
information available  to  the  public
without further notice.
  (b) EPA shall  furnish to States  with
approved  programs the  information in
its files not submitted under a claim of
confidentiality which the State needs
to  implement  its  approved  program.
EPA shall furnish to States with ap-
proved   programs   information   sub-
mitted  to  EPA  under a  claim  of con-
fidentiality, which the  State needs to
implement its approved program, sub-
ject to the conditions in 40 CFR part 2.
     Subpart C—State Program
            Submissions

§ 145.21  General requirements for pro-
    gram approvals.
  (a) States shall submit to the Admin-
istrator  a proposed State UIC program
complying-  with  §145.22 of  this  part
within 270 days of the date  of promul-
gation of the UIC regulations on June
24,  1980. The administrator may,  for
good cause, extend the date for submis-
sion of a proposed State UIC program
for up to an additional 270 days.
  (b) States shall submit to the Admin-
istrator 6 months after the date of pro-
mulgation of the UIC regulations a re-
port describing  the State's progress in
developing a UIC program.  If the Ad-
ministrator extends  the time for sub-
mission of a UIC program an additional
270 days,  pursuant  to §145.21(a),  the
State shall submit a second  report six
months  after the  first report  is  due.
The Administrator may prescribe  the
manner and form of the report.
  (c)  The  requirements of  §145.21 (a)
and (b)  shall  not  apply  to  Indian
Tribes.
  (d) EPA will establish a UIC program
in  any State which does not  comply
with paragraph (a) of this section. EPA
will continue to operate a UIC program
in such a State until  the State receives
approval of a UIC program  in  accord-
ance  with  the  requirements of  this
part.
  NOTE: States which are authorized to ad-
minister the NPDES permit program under
section 402 of CWA are encouraged to rely on
existing statutory authority,  to the extent
possible, in developing a State UIC program.
Section 402(b)(l)(D)  of  CWA  requires that
NPDES States have the authority "to issue
permits which control the disposal of pollut-
ants into wells." In many instances,  there-
fore. NPDES States will have existing statu-
tory authority to  regulate  well  disposal
which satisfies the requirements of the UIC
program. Note, however, that CWA excludes
certain types of well injections from the def-
inition of "pollutant." If the  State's  statu-
tory authority contains a similar exclusion
it may need to be modified to qualify for UIC
program approval.
  (e)  If  a  State  can  demonstrate  to
EPA's satisfaction that there  are no
underground  injections  within  the
State for one  or more classes of injec-
tion wells  (other  than Class IV wells)
                                     689

-------
§145.22
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
subject to  SDWA and that such injec-
tions cannot legally occur in the State
until the State has  developed  an ap-
proved program for those classes of in-
jections, the State need not submit a
program to  regulate  those injections
and  a  partial  program  may  be  ap-
proved. The demonstration of legal pro-
hibition shall be made by either explic-
itly banning new injections of the class
not covered  by the State program or
providing  a  certification  from  the
State Attorney General that such new
injections  cannot legally occur until
the State  has developed an approved
program for that class. The State shall
submit a  program  to regulate  both
those classes of injections for which a
demonstration is not made and class IV
wells.
  (f) When a State UIC program  is fully
approved by EPA to regulate all classes
of injections, the State  assumes  pri-
mary enforcement authority under sec-
tion 1422(b)(3)  of SDWA. EPA  retains
primary  enforcement  responsibility
whenever the  State program  is  dis-
approved in  whole or  in part.  States
which have  partially approved pro-
grams have  authority  to  enforce  any
violation  of the approved portion of
their program.  EPA  retains authority
to enforce violations of  State  under-
ground injection control programs, ex-
cept that, when a State has a fully ap-
proved program, EPA will not take en-
forcement  actions  without providing
prior notice to the State and otherwise
complying with section 1423 of SDWA.
  (g)  A State can assume primary en-
forcement  responsibility for the  UIC
program,   notwithstanding  §145.21(3),
when the State program is unable to
regulate activities  on Indian lands
within the State. EPA will administer
the  program on Indian  lands  if  the
State does not seek this authority.

[48 FR 14202, Apr. 1, 1983. as amended at 53
FR 37412, Sept 26, 1988]

§ 145.22  Elements of  a program sub-
   mission.

  (a)  Any State that  seeks to  admin-
ister  a program under this part shall
submit to  the Administrator at least
three copies of a program  submission.
The  submission shall contain  the  fol-
lowing:
  (1) A letter from the Governor of the
State requesting program approval;
  (2) A  complete program description,
as required by §145.23,  describing how
the State intends to carry out its re-
sponsibilities under this part;
  (3) An Attorney General's statement
as required by §145.24;
  (4)  A  Memorandum  of  Agreement
with the Regional Administrator as re-
quired by §145.25;
  (5) Copies of all applicable State stat-
utes and regulations, including  those
governing State administrative proce-
dures;
  (6) The showing required by § 145.3Kb)
of the State's public participation ac-
tivities prior to program submission.
  (b) Within 30 days of receipt by EPA
of a State program  submission, EPA
will  notify the State whether its sub-
mission is complete. If  EPA finds that
a State's submission is complete,  the
statutory review period (i.e., the period
of time allotted for formal EPA review
of a  proposed State program under the
Safe  Drinking  Water  Act)  shall  be
deemed to  have begun  on the date of
receipt  of  the State's  submission. If
EPA finds that a State's submission is
incomplete, the statutory  review  pe-
riod  shall not begin until all the nec-
essary information is received by EPA.
  (c) If the State's submission is mate-
rially changed during the statutory re-
view period,  the statutory review pe-
riod  shall begin again upon receipt of
the revised submission.
  (d) The State and EPA may extend
the statutory review period by agree-
ment.

§ 145.23 Program description.
  Any State that seeks to administer a
program under this part shall  submit a
description of the program it proposes
to administer in  lieu  of  the  Federal
program under State law or under  an
interstate  compact. The program de-
scription shall include:
  (a) A description in narrative form of
the  scope,  structure,  coverage  and
processes of the State program.
  (b) A description (including organiza-
tion charts) of the  organization and
structure of the State agency or agen-
cies  which will have responsibility for
administering the  program, including
the information listed  below.  If more
                                     690

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §145.23
than  one agency is responsible for ad-
ministration of a program, each, agency
must have statewide jurisdiction over a
class  of activities. The responsibilities
of  each  agency must be  delineated,
their procedures for coordination set
forth, and an agency may be designated
as a "lead agency" to facilitate commu-
nications between EPA and the State
agencies  having  program  responsi-
bility. When the State proposes to ad-
minister a program of greater scope  of
coverage  than is required  by Federal
law,  the  information  provided under
this paragraph shall indicate  the re-
sources dedicated to administering the
Federally required  portion  of the pro-
gram.
  (1) A description of the State agency
staff who will carry out the State pro-
gram, including the number, occupa-
tions,  and general duties  of  the  em-
ployees.  The  State need not  submit
complete job descriptions for every em-
ployee carrying out the State program.
  (2) An itemization of the estimated
costs of establishing and administering
the program  for the  first two years
after  approval, including cost of the
personnel listed  in paragraph (b)(l)  of
this  section,   cost  of administrative
support,  and cost of technical support.
  (3) An itemization of the sources and
amounts of funding, including an esti-
mate of Federal grant money, available
to the State Director for the first two
years after approval to meet the costs
listed in  paragraph (b)(2) of this  sec-
tion,  identifying any  restrictions  or
limitations upon this funding.
  (c) A description  of  applicable State
procedures,  including  permitting pro-
cedures and any State administrative
or judicial review procedures.
  (d)  Copies of the  permit form(s), ap-
plication  form(s),  reporting  form(s),
and manifest format the  State intends
to employ in its program. Forms used
by  States need not be identical to the
forms used by  EPA but should require
the same basic information. The State
need not provide copies of uniform na-
tional forms  it intends  to  use  but
should note its intention to  use such
forms.
  NOTE: States are encouraged to use uni-
form national forms established by the Ad-
ministrator. If uniform national forms are
used, they may be modified to include the
State  Agency's  name,  address,  logo, and
other similar information, as appropriate, in
place of EPA's.
  (e)  A  complete  description  of the
State's  compliance tracking  and en-
forcement program.
  (f) A State UIC program description
shall also include:
  (1) A schedule  for  issuing  permits
within five years  after program ap-
proval to  all injection wells within the
State which are  required to have per-
mits under this part and part 144;
  (2) The  priorities (according to cri-
teria  set  forth in 40 CFR 146.09) for
issuing permits, including the number
of permits  in  each class  of  injection
well which will  be issued each year
during the first five years  of program
operation;
  (3) A description  of how the Director
will implement the mechanical integ-
rity testing requirements  of  40 CFR
146.08, including the frequency of test-
ing that will be required and the num-
ber of tests that will be reviewed  by
the Director each year;
  (4) A description of  the procedure
whereby  the Director  will notify own-
ers and operators of injection wells  of
the requirement that  they apply for
and obtain  a permit.  The notification
required  by this  paragraph shall re-
quire applications to be filed as soon as
possible,  but not later than four years
after program approval for all injection
wells requiring a permit;
  (5) A description of any rule under
which the Director proposes to author-
ize injections, including the text of the
rule;
  (6) For any existing enhanced recov-
ery  and  hydrocarbon  storage  wells
which the Director proposes to author-
ize by rule, a description of the  proce-
dure for reviewing the  wells for compli-
ance with applicable  monitoring, re-
porting, construction,  and financial re-
sponsibility requirements  of  §§144.51
and 144.52, and 40 CFR part 146;
  (7) A description  of and schedule for
the State's program  to establish and
maintain  a  current inventory of injec-
tion wells which must be permitted
under State law;
  (8) Where the Director had designated
underground sources of drinking water
                                     691

-------
§145.24
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
in accordance with §144.7(a), a descrip-
tion and identification of all such des-
ignated sources in the State;
  (9) A description of aquifers,  or parts
thereof, which the Director has identi-
fied  under   §144.7(b)   as   exempted
aquifers, and a summary of supporting
data;
  (10) A description of  and schedule for
the  State's program to ban  Class  IV
wells prohibited under  §144.13; and
  (11) A description of  and schedule for
the State's program to establish an in-
ventory of Class V wells and to assess
the  need for a program  to  regulate
Class V wells.
  (12) For Class  V  programs  only. A de-
scription  of and  a schedule  for  the
State's plan to  identify and delineate
other  sensitive ground  water areas.
States  should consider geologic and
hydrogeologic settings, ground water
flow and  occurrence,  topographic and
geographic  features, depth to  ground
water, significance as a drinking water
source, prevailing land use practices
and any other existing information re-
lating to  the susceptibility of ground
water to  contamination from  Class V
injection  wells  when developing their
plan. Within the schedule for the plan,
States must commit to: completing all
delineations of  other sensitive ground
water areas by no later than  Jan. 1,
2004;  making these  delineation avail-
able to the public;  implementing  the
Class V regulations, effective  April 5,
2000,  in these delineated areas by  no
later than January 1, 2007. Alternately,
if a State chooses  not to identify other
sensitive  ground water areas,  the re-
quirements for motor  vehicle waste
disposal wells would apply statewide by
January 1, 2007.
[48  PR 14202, Apr. 1, 1983, as amended at 64
PR  68572, Deo. 7, 1999]

§ 145.24 Attorney  General's  statement.
  (a) Any  State that  seeks to admin-
ister a program under this part shall
submit a statement from the State At-
torney  General (or the attorney for
those  State  or  interstate  agencies
which have independent legal  counsel)
that the laws of the State, or an inter-
state compact,  provide adequate  au-
thority to carry out the program de-
scribed under §145.23 and to meet the
requirements  of this part.  This state-
ment shall include citations to the spe-
cific statutes,  administrative regula-
tions, and, where appropriate, judicial
decisions  which demonstrate  adequate
authority. State statutes and regula-
tions cited by the State Attorney Gen-
eral or independent legal counsel shall
be  in  the form of lawfully  adopted
State statutes  and regulations at  the
time the statement is  signed and shall
be fully effective by the time the pro-
gram is approved. To qualify as "inde-
pendent  legal  counsel"  the  attorney
signing the statement  required by this
section must have  full  authority  to
independently   represent  the   State
agency  in court on all  matters per-
taining to the State program.
  NOTE: EPA  will supply  States with  an
Attorney  General's  statement  format  on
request.
  (b) When  a  State  seeks  authority
over activities  on Indian  lands,  the
statement shall  contain an appropriate
analysis of the State's  authority.

§ 145.25 Memorandum  of  Agreement
    with the Regional Administrator.
  (a) Any State that  seeks to admin-
ister a program under this part shall
submit a  Memorandum of Agreement.
The Memorandum of Agreement shall
be executed by the State Director and
the Regional Administrator and shall
become effective when approved by the
Administrator.  In addition to meeting
the  requirements  of paragraph  (b)  of
this section,  the  Memorandum  of
Agreement may include  other terms,
conditions,  or  agreements consistent
with this  part and relevant to the ad-
ministration and  enforcement  of  the
State's  regulatory  program.  The Ad-
ministrator  shall  not  approve any
Memorandum of Agreement which con-
tains provisions which restrict BPA's
statutory oversight responsibility.
  (b) The Memorandum  of Agreement
shall include the following:
  (1) Provisions for the prompt transfer
from EPA to the State of pending per-
mit applications and  any other infor-
mation relevant to program operation
not  already  in  the  possession of  the
State Director  (e.g.,  support files for
permit  issuance, compliance  reports,
                                     692

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §145.31
etc.)- When existing permits are trans-
ferred from EPA to State for adminis-
tration,  the Memorandum  of  Agree-
ment shall contain  provisions speci-
fying: a procedure for transferring the
administration of these permits. If a
State lacks the  authority  to directly
administer permits issued by the Fed-
eral government, a procedure may be
established to transfer responsibility
for these permits.
  NOTE: For example, EPA and the State and
the permittee could  agree that the  State
would issue a permlt(s) identical to the out-
standing Federal permit which would simul-
taneously be terminated.
  (2) Provisions specifying classes and
categories of permit applications, draft
permits, and proposed permits that the
State will send to the Regional Admin-
istrator   for  review,   comment  and,
where applicable, objection.
  (3)  Provisions specifying  the   fre-
quency  and content  of reports,  docu-
ments and other information which the
State is required to submit to EPA.
The State shall allow EPA to routinely
review State records, reports, and files
relevant to the administration and en-
forcement of the  approved program.
State reports may be  combined  with
grant reports where appropriate.
  (4) Provisions on  the  State's compli-
ance monitoring and enforcement pro-
gram, including:
  (i)  Provisions  for coordination  of
compliance monitoring activities  by
the  State and  by  EPA.  These  may
specify the basis on which the Regional
Administrator  will select facilities or
activities within the State for EPA in-
spection.  The Regional Administrator
will normally notify the State at least
7 days before any such inspection; and
  (ii) Procedures to assure coordination
of enforcement activities.
  (5) When  appropriate, provisions for
joint  processing of  permits by  the
State and EPA, for facilities or activi-
ties which require  permits from  both
EPA and the State  under different pro-
grams. See §124.4.
  (6) Provisions for modification of the
Memorandum of Agreement in accord-
ance with this part.
  (c) The Memorandum of Agreement,
the annual program and grant and the
State/EPA Agreement  should be  con-
sistent. If the  State/EPA  Agreement
indicates that a change is needed in the
Memorandum  of   Agreement,   the
Memorandum of Agreement may  be
amended  through the  procedures set
forth  in  this part.  The  State/EPA
Agreement   may  not  override   the
Memorandum of Agreement.
  NOTE: Detailed program priorities and spe-
cific arrangements  for EPA support of the
State program will change and are therefore
more appropriately negotiated in the con-
text of annual agreements rather than in the
MOA. However, it may still be appropriate to
specify  in the MOA the basis for such  de-
tailed agreements,  e.g., a provision in the
MOA specifying that EPA will select facili-
ties in the State for inspection annually as
part of the State/EPA agreement.

  Subpart D—Program Approval,
     Revision ana Withdrawal

§ 145.31 Approval process.
  (a) Prior  to submitting an applica-
tion to the Administrator for approval
of a State UIC program, the State shall
issue public notice of  its  intent  to
adopt a UIC program and to seek pro-
gram approval from EPA. This public
notice  shall:
  (1) Be  circulated  in  a manner cal-
culated to attract the attention of in-
terested  persons.  Circulation  of  the
public  notice shall include publication
in enough of the largest newspapers in
the State to attract Statewide atten-
tion and mailing to persons  on appro-
priate  State mailing lists and  to any
other  persons  whom the agency has
reason to believe are interested;
  (2) Indicate  when  and where  the
State's proposed program submission
may be reviewed by the public;
  (3) Indicate the cost of obtaining a
copy of the submission;
  (4) Provide for  a  comment period of
not less than 30 days during which in-
terested persons may comment  on the
proposed UIC program;
  (5) Schedule a public hearing  on the
State program for no less than 30  days
after notice of the hearing is published;
  (6) Briefly outline the fundamental
aspects of the State UIC program; and
  (7) Identify a person that an inter-
ested member of the public  may  con-
tact for further information.
  (b) After complying with the require-
ments  of paragraph  (a) of this section
any State may submit a proposed UIC
                                    693

-------
§145.32
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
program under section 1422 of SDWA
and §145.22 of this part to BPA for ap-
proval. Such a submission shall include
a  showing  of compliance  with para-
graph (a) of this section; copies of all
written  comments  received  by  the
State;  a transcript,  recording  or sum-
mary of any public hearing which was
held by the State; and a responsiveness
summary which  identifies  the public
participation  activities conducted, de-
scribes  the  matters presented to  the
public,  summarizes significant com-
ments  received,  and responds to these
comments. A copy  of  the  responsive-
ness summary shall be sent to those
who testified at the hearing, and others
upon request.
  (c) After determining that a State's
submission for UIC program approval is
complete the Administrator shall issue
public  notice  of the submission in the
FEDERAL REGISTER and in  accordance
with paragraph  (a)(l)  of this  section.
Such notice shall:
  (1) Indicate that a public hearing will
be held by EPA no earlier than 30 days
after notice of the hearing.  The notice
may require persons wishing to present
testimony  to file a request with  the
Regional Administrator, who may can-
cel the public hearing if sufficient pub-
lic interest  in  a hearing  is  not ex-
pressed;
  (2) Afford the public 30 days after the
notice  to comment on the State's sub-
mission; and
  (3) Note the availability of the State
submission for inspection and  copying
by the  public.
  (d) The Administrator shall  approve
State programs which  conform to the
applicable requirements of this part.
  (e) Within 90 days  of  the receipt of a
complete submission  (as provided  in
§145.22) or material  amendment there-
to, the Administrator  shall by rule ei-
ther fully approve,  disapprove, or ap-
prove in part the State's UIC program
taking  into  account   any   comments
submitted.  The  Administrator shall
give notice of this rule in the FEDERAL
REGISTER and in accordance with para-
graph (a)(l) of this section. If the Ad-
ministrator determines not to approve
the  State  program  or to  approve it
only in part, the notice shall include a
concise statement  of  the reasons for
this determination.  A responsiveness
summary shall be prepared by the Re-
gional Office which identifies the pub-
lic participation activities conducted.
describes the matters presented to the
public,  summarizes significant  com-
ments received,  and explains the Agen-
cy's  response to these comments. The
responsiveness summary shall be sent
to those  who testified at the public
hearing,  and to others upon request.

§ 145.32  Procedures  for   revision  of
   State programs.
  (a) Either EPA or the approved State
may  initiate  program revision.  Pro-
gram revision may be necessary when
the controlling" Federal or  State statu-
tory or regulatory authority is modi-
fied  or supplemented.  The state shall
keep  EPA fully informed  of any pro-
posed modifications to its  basic statu-
tory or regulatory authority, its forms.
procedures, or priorities.
  (b) Revision of a State program shall
be accomplished as follows:
  (1) The State shall submit a modified
program   description,  Attorney   Gen-
eral's  statement,   Memorandum  of
Agreement, or such other documents as
EPA determines to be necessary under
the circumstances.
  (2)  Whenever  EPA determines  that
the proposed program revision is sub-
stantial,  EPA shall issue public notice
and  provide  an opportunity to com-
ment for a period of at least 30 days.
The public notice shall be mailed to in-
terested  persons and shall  be published
in  the  FEDERAL  REGISTER  and  in
enough of the largest newspapers in the
State to  provide  Statewide coverage.
The  public notice  shall summarize the
proposed revisions and provide for the
opportunity to request a  public hear-
ing.  Such a hearing  will  be held is
there  if  significant  public interest
based on requests received.
  (3) The Administrator shall approve
or disapprove program revisions  based
on the requirements of this part and of
the Safe  Drinking Water Act.
  (4) A program revision shall become
effective upon the approval of the Ad-
ministrator. Notice of approval of any
substantial revision shall be published
in the FEDERAL REGISTER. Notice of ap-
proval of non-substantial program revi-
sions may be given by a letter from the
                                     694

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §145.34
Administrator to the State  Governor
or his designee.
  (c)  States with  approved  programs
shall notify EPA whenever they pro-
pose to transfer all or part of any pro-
gram from  the approved State  agency
to any other State agency, and shall
identify any  new  division of  respon-
sibilities among the agencies involved.
The  new  agency is not authorized to
administer the program until approval
by the Administrator under paragraph
(b)   of this  section.   Organizational
charts required under §145.23(b) shall
be revised and resubmitted.
  (d) Whenever the Administrator  has
reason  to  believe  that  circumstances
have changed with respect to a State
program,  he  may  request,  and  the
State shall provide, a supplemental At-
torney  General's  statement, program
description, or such  other documents
or information as are necessary.
  (e) The  State shall submit the infor-
mation required under paragraph (b)(l)
of this section within 270 days of any
amendment to this part  or 40  CPR part
144,  146, or 124 which revises or adds
any  requirement  respecting  an  ap-
proved UIC program.

§145.33 Criteria   for withdrawal  of
   State programs.
  (a) The Administrator may  withdraw
program approval  when a State pro-
gram no longer complies with  the re-
quirements  of this part, and the State
fails to take corrective action. Such
circumstances include the following:
  (1) When the State's legal authority
no longer meets their requirements of
this part, including:
  (i)  Failure of the State to promulgate
or enact  new authorities  when nec-
essary; or
  (ii) Action by a State legislature or
court striking down or  limiting State
authorities.
  (2) When the operation of the State
program fails to  comply with  the re-
quirements of this part, including:
  (i)  Failure to exercise control over
activities   required  to  be  regulated
under  this  part,  including failure  to
'ssue permits;
  (ii)  Repeated   issuance  of  permits
which  do  not conform to  the require-
ments of this part; or
  (ill) Failure to comply with the pub-
lic  participation requirements  of this
part.
  (3)  When  the State's  enforcement
program fails to comply with  the re-
quirements of this part, including:
  (i) Failure to act on violations of per-
mits or other program requirements:
  (ii) Failure to seek adequate enforce-
ment  penalties  or to collect adminis-
trative fines when imposed; or
  (iii) Failure to inspect and monitor
activities subject to regulation.
  (4) When the State program fails to
comply with the terms of the  Memo-
randum  of Agreement  required under
§145.24.

§ 145.34   Procedures for withdrawal of
    State programs.
  (a) A  State with a program approved
under this part may voluntarily trans-
fer  program  responsibilities required
by  Federal law  to EPA by taking the
following actions,  or  in  such other
manner as may  be  agreed  upon with
the Administrator.
  (1) The State shall give the Adminis-
trator 180 days notice of the proposed
transfer and shall submit a plan for the
orderly  transfer of all relevant pro-
gram information not in the possession
of EPA (such as permits, permit files,
compliance files, reports, permit appli-
cations) which are necessary for EPA
to administer the program.
  (2) Within 60 days of receiving  the no-
tice and  transfer plan, the Adminis-
trator shall evaluate the State's trans-
fer  plan and  shall identify  any addi-
tional information needed by the Fed-
eral government for program adminis-
tration  and/or identify  any other defi-
ciencies in the plan.
  (3) At least 30 days before  the trans-
fer  is  to occur the Administrator shall
publish  notice of the transfer  in  the
FEDERAL  REGISTER and in  enough of
the largest newspapers  in the State to
provide  Statewide coverage,  and shall
mail notice to all permit holders, per-
mit applicants, other regulated persons
and other interested persons on appro-
priate EPA and State mailing lists.
  (b) Approval of a State UIC program
may be withdrawn and a Federal pro-
gram  established in its  place when the
Administrator determines, after hold-
ing  a public hearing, that  the State
                                    695
      203-160  D-23

-------
§145.52

program is not in compliance with the
requirements of SDWA and this part.
  (1) Notice to  State of public hearing. If
the Administrator has cause to believe
that a State is not administering or en-
forcing its authorized program in com-
pliance   with  the   requirements  of
SDWA and this part, he or she shall in-
form the State by registered  mail of
the specific areas of alleged noncompli-
ance. If the State demonstrates to the
Administrator within 30  days  of such
notification that the State program is
in compliance, the Administrator shall
take  no further action  toward with-
drawal and shall so notify the State by
registered mail.
  (2) Public hearing. If the  State has not
demonstrated   its compliance to  the
satisfaction of the Administrator with-
in 30 days after notification, the  Ad-
ministrator shall inform  the State Di-
rector and schedule a public hearing to
discuss  withdrawal  of  the State pro-
gram. Notice  of  such  public  hearing
shall be published in the FEDERAL REG-
ISTER and in  enough  of the  largest
newspapers  in  the  State  to  attract
statewide attention, and mailed to per-
sons  on appropriate State  and  EPA
mailing  lists.  This  hearing  shall  be
convened not  less than  60 days  nor
more than 75  days following the publi-
cation of the notice of the hearing. No-
tice of  the  hearing shall identify the
Administrator's  concerns.  All  inter-
ested persons shall  be  given  oppor-
tunity to make written or oral presen-
tation on the  State's program at the
public hearing.
  (3) Notice  to State  of findings. When
the Administrator finds after the pub-
lic hearing  that  the  State  is  not in
compliance, he or she shall notify the
State by registered mail of the specific
deficiencies in the State  program and
of necessary remedial actions.  Within
90 days of receipt of the  above letter,
the State shall either carry out the re-
quired remedial action or the Adminis-
trator  shall  withdraw  program  ap-
proval. If the  State carries out the re-
medial  action or,  as a  result  of the
hearing is found to be in compliance,
the  Administrator shall  so notify the
State by registered mail  and conclude
the withdrawal proceedings.
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)

      Subpart E—Indian Tribes

  SOURCE: 53 FR 37412, Sept. 26, 1988, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 145.52 Requirements for  Tribal eligi-
   bility.
  The  Administrator is  authorized to
treat an  Indian Tribe  as eligible to
apply for  primary enforcement respon-
sibility for the Underground Injection
Control Program  if it meets  the  fol-
lowing criteria:
  (a) The  Indian Tribe is recognized by
the Secretary  of the Interior.
  (b) The Indian Tribe has a Tribal gov-
erning body which  is currently "car-
rying out substantial governmental du-
ties  and powers" over a defined area,
(i.e., is currently performing  govern-
mental  functions  to  promote   the
health, safety, and  welfare of the af-
fected population within a  defined  geo-
graphic area).
  (c)  The Indian  Tribe demonstrates
that the functions to be performed in
regulating the  underground injection
wells that the applicant  intends to  reg-
ulate are  within the area of the Indian
Tribal government's jurisdiction.
  (d) The Indian Tribe is reasonably ex-
pected to be capable, in the Adminis-
trator's judgment, of administering (in
a  manner consistent with the terms
and purposes of the Act and all applica-
ble  regulations)  an effective  Under-
ground Injection Control Program.
[53 PR 37412, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended  at 59
FR 64345, Dec. 14, 1994]

§ 145.56 Request by an Indian Tribe
    for a determination of eligibility.
  An Indian Tribe may apply to the Ad-
ministrator for a determination that it
meets the criteria of section 1451 of the
Act. The  application shall be concise
and describe how the Indian Tribe  will
meet  each of the  requirements of
§ 145.52. The application shall consist of
the following:
  (a) A statement that the  Tribe is  rec-
ognized   by   the   Secretary  of  the
Interior.
  (b)  A   descriptive statement dem-
onstrating that the Tribal  governing
body is currently carrying  out substan-
tial  governmental duties  and  powers
over  a defined area. The statement
should:
                                     696

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §145.58
  (1)  Describe  the form  of  the  Tribal
government;
  (2)  Describe  the types  of govern-
mental functions currently performed
by  the  Tribal governing  body such as,
but not limited to, the exercise of po-
lice powers  affecting  (or relating to)
the health, safety,  and welfare  of the
affected population; taxation; and the
exercise of the power of eminent do-
main; and
  (3) Identify the  sources of the  Tribal
government's authority  to  carry  out
the governmental functions  currently
being performed.
  (c) A  map or legal description of the
area  over  which  the  Indian  Tribe as-
serts  jurisdiction;  a statement by the
Tribal Attorney General  (or equivalent
official) which describes  the basis for
the Tribe's jurisdictional assertion (in-
cluding the nature or subject matter of
the asserted  jurisdiction); a copy  of
those documents  such as Tribal  con-
stitutions, by-laws, charters, executive
orders,  codes, ordinances, and/or reso-
lutions  which  the  Tribe believes  are
relevant to its assertions regarding ju-
risdiction; and a description  of the lo-
cations of the  underground injection
wells  the Tribe proposes to regulate.
  (d) A  narrative  statement describing
the capability of the Indian Tribe  to
administer  an  effective  Underground
Injection   Control  program   which
should include:
  (1) A description of the  Indian Tribe's
previous   management    experience
which may include, the administration
of  programs and  services authorized
under the Indian  Self-Determina.tion
and  Education   Assistance  Act  (25
U.S.C. 450  et seq.), the Indian Mineral
Development Act (25 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.),
or  the   Indian  Sanitation   Facilities
Construction Activity Act  (42  U.S.C.
2004a).
  (2) A  list of existing environmental
or  public  health  programs  adminis-
tered  by the Tribal governing body and
a copy  of related Tribal  laws, regula-
tions and policies.
  (3) A description of the Indian Tribe's
accounting and procurement systems.
  (4) A description of the  entity (or en-
tities)  which exercise the  executive,
legislative,  and  judicial  functions  of
the Tribal government.
  (5) A description of the existing, or
proposed, agency of  the Indian Tribe
which will assume  primary  enforce-
ment  responsibility,  including  a  de-
scription of the relationship  between
owners/operators  of  the underground
injection wells and the agency.
  (6) A description of the technical and
administrative capabilities  of the staff
to administer and manage an effective
Underground  Injection   Control  Pro-
gram or a plan which proposes how the
Tribe will acquire additional adminis-
trative and/or technical  expertise. The
plan must address how  the Tribe will
obtain the  funds  to acquire the  addi-
tional  administrative  and technical
expertise.
  (e) The Adminstrator may, in his dis-
cretion, request further documentation
necessary  to  support a  Tribe's eligi-
bility.
  (f)  If  the  Administrator has pre-
viously determined  that a Tribe has
met the prerequisites that make it eli-
gible  to  assume a role similar to that
of a State as provided by statute under
the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean
Water Act,  or the Clean  Air Act, then
that Tribe need provide  only  that  in-
formation  unique to  the Underground
Injection Control program (§145.76(c)
and (d)(6)).

[53 PR 37412, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 59
FR 64345, Dec 14, 1994]

§ 145.58  Procedure for  processing  an
    Indian Tribe's application.
  (a) The Administrator  shall process a
completed  application  of  an  Indian
Tribe  in  a timely manner. He  shall
promptly notify the Indian Tribe of re-
ceipt of the application.
  (b) A tribe  that meets the  require-
ments of §145.52 is eligible to apply  for
development grants  and primary en-
forcement responsibility for an Under-
ground Injection Control program and
the associated funding  under section
1443(b) of the Act and primary  enforce-
ment   responsibility   for  the   Under-
ground  Injection  Control  Program
under  sections 1422 and/or  1425 of the
Act.

[53 PR 37412, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 59
FR 64345, Dec. 14, 1994]
                                     697

-------
Pt. 146
                                                    40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
PART  146—UNDERGROUND  INJEC-
  TION  CONTROL PROGRAM: CRI-
  TERIA AND STANDARDS
      Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
146.1
146.2
146.3
146.4
146.5
146.6
146.7
146.8
146.9
     Applicability and scope.
     Law authorizing these regulations.
     Definitions.
     Criteria for exempted aquifers.
     Classification of injection wells.
     Area of review.
     Corrective action.
     Mechanical integrity.
     Criteria  for  establishing  permitting
   priorities.
146.10  Plugging and abandoning Class I-III
   wells.

    Subpart B—Criteria and Standards
       Applicable to Class I Wells

146.11  Criteria and standards  applicable to
   Class I nonhazardous wells.
146.12  Construction requirements.
146.13  Operating, monitoring and reporting
   requirements.
146.14  Information to be considered by the
   Director.

    Subpart C—Criteria and Standards
       Applicable to Class II Wells
146.21  Applicability.
146.22  Construction requirements.
146.23  Operating, monitoring, and reporting
   requirements.
146.24  Information to be considered by the
   Director.

    Subpart D—Criteria and Standards
       Applicable to Class III Wells

146.31  Applicability.
146.32  Construction requirements.
146.33  Operating, monitoring, and reporting
   requirements.
146.34  Information to be considered by the
   Director.

Subpart E—Criteria  and Standards  Appli-
    cable to Class IV Injection Wells [Re-
    served]

    Subpart F—Criteria and Standards
   Applicable to Class V Injection Wells

146.51  Applicability.

Subpart G—Criteria and Standards  Appli-
    cable to Class I Hazardous Waste In-
    jection Wells
146.61
146.62
      Applicability.
      Minimum criteria for siting.
146.63  Area of review.
146.64  Corrective action for wells in the area
   of review.
146.65  Construction requirements.
146.66  Logging, sampling, and testing prior
   to new well operation.
146.67  Operating requirements.
146.68  Testing  and  monitoring  require-
   ments.
146.69  Reporting requirements.
146.70  Information to be  evaluated by the
   Director.
146.71  Closure.
146.72  Post-closure care.
146.73  Financial responsibility for post-clo-
   sure care.
  AUTHORITY:  Safe Drinking  Water Act, 42
U.S.C. 300f et seg.; Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seg.
  SOURCE: 45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, unless
otherwise noted.

  Subpart A—General Provisions

§ 146.1  Applicability and scope.
  (a) This part sets forth technical cri-
teria  and  standards  for  the  Under-
ground  Injection  Control  Program.
This part should be read in conjunction
with  40 CFR parts 124, 144,  and 145,
which also apply  to  UIC  programs. 40
CFR  part 144  defines  the  regulatory
framework of EPA administered  per-
mit  programs.  40 CFR part  145  de-
scribes the elements of an  approvable
State program and procedures for EPA
approval of  State participation in  the
permit programs.  40 CFR part  124 de-
scribes the procedures  the Agency will
use for issuing permits under the  cov-
ered programs. Certain of these proce-
dures will also apply to State-adminis-
tered programs  as specified in 40 CFR
part 145.
  (b)  Upon  the approval, partial  ap-
proval  or promulgation of a State UIC
program by the Administrator, any un-
derground injection  which  is  riot  au-
thorized by  the  Director by rule or by
permit is unlawful.

(Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act,
Clean Air Act, Resource  Conservation  and
Recovery Act:  42 U.S.C. 6905,  6912, 6925, 6927,
6974)
[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 48
FR 14293, Apr. 1, 1983]
                                       698

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §146.3
§ 146.2  Law  authorizing these  regula-
    tions.
  The  Safe  Drinking  Water  Act, 42
U.S.C. 300f et seq. authorizes these regu-
lations and all other UIC program  reg-
ulations referenced in 40 CFR part 144.
Certain regulations  relating to the in-
jection of hazardous waste are also au-
thorized by the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.
[58 FR 63898, Dec. 3, 1993]

§ 146.3  Definitions.
  The  following definitions  apply to
the underground injection control  pro-
gram.
  Abandoned  well means a well  whose
use has been  permanently discontinued
or which is in a state of disrepair such
that it cannot be used for its intended
purpose or for observation purposes.
  Administrator  means  the   Adminis-
trator of the United States  Environ-
mental Protection Agency, or  an au-
thorized representative.
  Application  means  the EPA standard
national forms for applying for  a  per-
mit, including any additions,  revisions
or modifications to the forms; or forms
approved  by  EPA for use in  approved
States, including  any approved  modi-
fications or revisions. For RCRA, appli-
cation also  includes the information
required by the Director under §122.25
(contents of Part B of the RCRA appli-
cation).
  Aquifer  means a  geological  forma-
tion, group of formations, or  part  of a
formation that is capable of yielding a
significant amount of water to a well
or spring.
  Area of review means the area  sur-
rounding  an  injection  well described
according to the criteria set forth in
§ 146.06 or in the case of an area permit,
the project area plus a circumscribing
area the width of which is either \'i of
a mile or a number  calculated accord-
ing to the criteria set forth in §146.06.
  Casing means  a pipe or tubing of ap-
propriate  material,  of varying  diame-
ter and weight, lowered into a borehole
during or after drilling in order to sup-
port the sides of the hole and  thus  pre-
vent the walls from  caving, to prevent
loss of drilling mud into  porous ground,
or to prevent water,  gas, or other fluid
from entering or leaving the hole.
  Catastrophic collapse means the sud-
den  and  utter  failure  of  overlying
"strata" caused by removal  of under-
lying materials.
  Cementing   means   the   operation
whereby a  cement  slurry  is  pumped
into a  drilled hole and/or forced behind
the casing.
  Cesspool means a "drywell" that re-
ceives  untreated sanitary waste con-
taining human  excreta, and  which
sometimes has an open  bottom and/or
perforated sides.
  Confining bed means a  body of imper-
meable or  distinctly less  permeable
material stratigraphically adjacent to
one or  more aquifers.
  Confining  zone means a  geological
formation, group of formations, or part
of a formation that is capable  of lim-
iting fluid movement above an injec-
tion zone.
  Contaminant  means   any  physical,
chemical,   biological,  or  radiological
substance or matter in water.
  Conventional mine means an open pit
or underground excavation for the pro-
duction of minerals.
  Director  means the Regional Adminis-
trator, the State director or  the Tribal
director as the context requires, or an
authorized representative. When there
is no  approved State  or Tribal pro-
gram,  and there is  an  EPA adminis-
tered program,  "Director" means  the
Regional Administrator. When there is
an approved State or Tribal program,
"Director" normally means the State or
Tribal  director. In some circumstances,
however, EPA retains the authority to
take certain actions even when there is
an approved State or Tribal program.
(For example, when EPA has issued an
NPDES permit prior to the approval of
a State program, EPA may  retain ju-
risdiction over that permit  after pro-
gram approval; see  §123.69). In such
cases, the term Director  means the  Re-
gional  Administrator and not the State
or Tribal director.
  Disposal well means a well used for
the disposal of waste into a subsurface
stratum.
  Dry well  means a well,  other than an
improved  sinkhole or subsurface fluid
distribution system,  completed  above
the water table so that its bottom  and
sides are typically dry except when re-
ceiving fluids.
                                     699

-------
§146.3
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  Effective date of a UIC program means
the date that a State UIC program is
approved or established by the Admin-
istrator.
  Environmental   Protection   Agency
("EPA") means the United States Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency.
  EPA means the United States "Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency."
  Exempted aquifer means an aquifer or
its  portion that meets the criteria in
the definition  of "underground source
of drinking water" but which  has been
exempted according to the procedures
of §144.8(b).
  Existing injection well means an "in-
jection well" other than a "new  injec-
tion well."
  Experimental technology means a tech-
nology which has not been proven fea-
sible under the conditions in  which it
is being tested.
  Facility or activity means any "HWM
facility," UIC  "injection well," NPDES
"point source," or State 404 dredge and
fill  activity, or any other facility or ac-
tivity  (including land or appurtenances
thereto) that  is subject to regulation
under  the RCRA, UIC,  NPDES, or 404
programs.
  Fault means a surface or zone of rock
fracture along which  there has been
displacement.
  Flow rate means the volume  per time
unit given to the flow of gases or other
fluid substance which emerges from an
orifice, pump, turbine or passes along a
conduit or channel.
  Fluid means material or substance
which  flows  or moves  whether in  a
semisolid, liquid,  sludge, gas, or any
other form or state.
  Formation means a body of rock char-
acterized by a degree of lithologic ho-
mogeneity which  is prevailingly,  but
not   necessarily,    tabular   and   is
mappable on  the  earth's surface  or
traceable in the subsurface.
  Formation fluid means  "fluid" present
in a "formation"  under natural condi-
tions  as opposed to introduced fluids,
such as drilling mud.
  Generator means any  person, by site
location, whose act or process  produces
hazardous waste identified or  listed in
40 CFR part 261.
  Ground water means water below the
land surface in a zone of saturation.
  Hazardous waste means a hazardous
waste as defined in 40 CFR 261.3.
  Hazardous Waste Management facility
("HWM facility") means all contiguous
land,  and  structures,  other appur-
tenances,  and  improvements  on  the
land used for treating, storing, or  dis-
posing of hazardous waste. A facility
may consist of several treatment, stor-
age, or  disposal operational units  (for
example, one or more landfills, surface
impoundments,  or   combination   of
them).
  HWM  facility  means  "Hazardous
Waste Management facility."
  Improved sinkhole means a  naturally
occurring karst depression  or  other
natural crevice  found in  volcanic  ter-
rain and other geologic settings which
have been modified by man for the pur-
pose of directing and emplacing fluids
into the subsurface.
  Indian Tribe means any Indian  Tribe
having  a  Federally recognized  gov-
erning body carrying out substantial
governmental duties and powers over a
defined area.
  Injection  well  means a "well"  into
which "fluids" are being injected.
  Injection  zone  means   a  geological
"formation",  group  of formations,  or
part of a  formation  receiving fluids
through a well.
  Lithology  means the description of
rocks on the basis of their physical and
chemical characteristics.
  Owner or operator means the owner or
operator of any facility or activity sub-
ject to regulation under the RCRA,
UIC, NPDES, or 404 programs.
  Packer means a device lowered into a
well to produce a fluid-tight seal.
  Permit  means  an  authorization,  li-
cense, or equivalent control document
issued by EPA  or an "approved State"
to implement the requirements of this
part and parts 124, 144, and 145. Permit
does not include RCRA interim status
(§122.23),  UIC  authorization  by  rule
(§§144.21  to 144.26 and 144.15), or  any
permit which has not yet been the sub-
ject of final agency action, such as a
"draft permit" or a "proposed permit."
  Plugging means the act  or process of
stopping the flow  of water, oil or gas
into or out of  a formation through a
borehole or well penetrating  that  for-
mation.
                                    700

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §146.3
  Plugging record  means a systematic
listing  of  permanent  or temporary
abandonment of water, oil, gas, test,
exploration and waste injection wells,
and may contain a well log, description
of amounts and types of plugging mate-
rial  used, the  method employed  for
plugging, a  description of formations
which are sealed  and a graphic log of
the well  showing formation  location,
formation thickness,  and  location  of
plugging structures.
  Point of injection for Class  V wells
means  the  last  accessible  sampling
point prior to waste fluids being  re-
leased into the subsurface  environment
through a Class V injection well. For
example,  the point of  injection of a
Class V septic system might be  the dis-
tribution box—the last accessible sam-
pling point  before  the  waste fluids
drain into the underlying soils. For a
dry well, it is likely to be the well bore
itself.
  Pressure means the total  load or force
per unit area acting on a surface.
  Project means a group of wells in a
single operation.
  Radioactive waste  means any waste
which contains radioactive material in
concentrations which exceed those list-
ed in 10 CFR part 20, appendix B, table
II column 2.
  RCRA  means  the Solid  Waste Dis-
posal Act as amended by the  Resource
Conservation and  Recovery Act of 1976
(Pub. L. 94-580, as amended by  Pub.  L.
95-609, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.).
  Sanitary waste means liquid or solid
wastes originating solely from humans
and human activities, such as wastes
collected  from toilets, showers,  wash
basins,  sinks used for cleaning domes-
tic areas, sinks used for food prepara-
tion,  clothes washing operations, and
sinks or washing  machines where food
and  beverage serving  dishes,  glasses,
and  utensils are  cleaned.  Sources  of
these  wastes may  include single   or
multiple residences, hotels and  motels,
restaurants, bunkhouses, schools, rang-
er stations, crew  quarters, guard sta-
tions, campgrounds,  picnic  grounds,
day-use recreation areas,  other  com-
mercial facilities,  and industrial facili-
ties  provided the waste is not mixed
with industrial waste.
  SOW A  means   the  Safe  Drinking
Water Act (Pub. L. 95-523,  as amended
by  Pub. L. 95-190,  42  U.S.C.  300(f)  et
seq.).
  Septic system means a "well"  that  is
used to emplace sanitary  waste below
the surface and is typically comprised
of a septic tank and subsurface fluid
distribution system  or disposal system.
  Site means  the land or  water area
where any facility or activity is phys-
ically located or conducted, including
adjacent land used in connection with
the facility or activity.
  Sole or principal source aquifer means
an  aquifer which has been designated
by  the Administrator pursuant to sec-
tion 1424 (a) or (e) of the SDWA.
  State Director means the chief admin-
istrative  officer of  any  State, inter-
state, or Tribal agency  operating an
"approved  program," or the delegated
representative of the State Director. If
the responsibility is  divided among two
or  more  State,  interstate, or Tribal
agencies, "State Director" means the
chief  administrative  officer   of  the
State, interstate, or Tribal agency au-
thorized to perform  the particular pro-
cedure or function to which reference
is made.
  Stratum (plural strata) means a single
sedimentary bed or layer, regardless  of
thickness,  that consists  of generally
the same kind of rock material.
  Subsidence means the lowering of the
natural  land  surface in  response to:
Earth  movements;  lowering  of  fluid
pressure;  removal of underlying sup-
porting material by  mining or  solution
of  solids,  either artificially  or  from
natural causes; compaction due to wet-
ting (Hydrocompaction);  oxidation  of
organic matter  in soils; or added load
on the land surface.
  Subsurface  fluid   distribution system
means   an  assemblage  of perforated
pipes,  drain  tiles,  or other   similar
mechanisms   intended to  distribute
fluids below the surface of the ground.
  Surface casing means the first string
of well  casing to be installed in the
well.
  Total  dissolved solids ("TDS") means
the total dissolved (filterable) solids as
determined by use of the method speci-
fied in 40 CFR part 136.
  UIC means  the Underground Injec-
tion Control program under Part C  of
the Safe Drinking Water Act, including
an "approved program."
                                     701

-------
§146.4
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  Underground  injection  means  a "well
injection."
  Underground  source of drinking water
(USDW)   means   an  aquifer  or  its
portion:
  (l)(i) Which supplies any public water
system; or
  (ii) Which contains a sufficient quan-
tity of ground water to supply a public
water system; and
  (A) Currently supplies  drinking water
for human consumption; or
  (B) Contains fewer than 10,000 mg/1
total dissolved solids; and
  (2) Which is not an exempted aquifer.
  USDW means "underground source of
drinking- water."
  Well means: A bored, drilled, or driv-
en shaft whose depth is greater than
the largest surface dimension; or, a dug
hole whose  depth is greater than the
largest  surface dimension; or,  an im-
proved sinkhole;  or, a subsurface fluid
distribution system.
  Well injection means  the  subsurface
emplacement of fluids through a well.
  Well plug  means  a watertight  and
gastight seal installed in a borehole  or
well to prevent movement of fluids.
  Well stimulation means several proc-
esses used to clean the well bore, en-
large channels, and increase  pore space
in the interval to be injected thus mak-
ing it possible for wastewater to move
more readily into the  formation, and
includes  (1)  surging, (2) jetting,  (3)
blasting,  (4)  acidizing,   (5)  hydraulic
fracturing.
  Well monitoring  means the measure-
ment, by on-site instruments or labora-
tory methods,  of  the quality of water
in a well.

(Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act,
Clean Air Act, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act:  42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912, 6925, 6927,
6974)
[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
PR 43161, Aug. 27,  1981; 47  FR 4998, Feb. 3,
1982;  48 FR 14293, Apr. 1, 1983; 53 FR 37414,
Sept. 26, 1988; 64 FR 68573, Dec. 7,  1999]

§ 146.4  Criteria for exempted aquifers.
  An aquifer  or a portion thereof which
meets the criteria for an "underground
source of drinking water" in  § 146.3 may
be determined under 40 CPR 144.8 to  be
an "exempted aquifer" if it  meets the
following criteria:
  (a) It does not currently serve as a
source of drinking water; and
  (b) It cannot now and will not in the
future serve as a  source of drinking
water because:
  (1) It is  mineral, hydrocarbon or geo-
thermal energy producing, or  can be
demonstrated by a permit applicant as
part of a permit application for a Class
II or III operation to contain minerals
or hydrocarbons that considering their
quantity and location  are expected to
be commercially producible.
  (2) It is situated at a depth or loca-
tion which makes recovery of water for
drinking water purposes  economically
or technologically impractical;
  (3)  It is  so contaminated that  it
would be  economically  or  techno-
logically  impractical  to  render that
water fit for human consumption; or
  (4) It is located over a Class III well
mining area subject to subsidence or
catastrophic collapse; or
  (c) The total dissolved solids content
of the ground water is more than 3,000
and less than 10,000 mg/1 and it is not
reasonably expected to supply a, public
water system.
(Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act,
Clean Air  Act, Resource  Conservation and
Recovery Act: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912, 6925, 6927,
6974)
[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 47
FR 4998, Feb. 3, 1982; 48 FR 14293, Apr. 1, 1983]

§ 146.5 Classification of injection wells.
  Injection   wells  are classified  as
follows:
  (a) Class I. (1) Wells used by genera-
tors of hazardous waste  or owners or
operators  of hazardous waste manage-
ment  facilities  to  inject  hazardous
waste  beneath the  lowermost forma-
tion containing, within one quarter (Vi)
mile of the well  bore,  an  underground
source of drinking water.
  (2)  Other  industrial and  municipal
disposal wells  which  inject fluids be-
neath  the lowermost  formation con-
taining, within one quarter mile of the
well bore, an underground  source  of
drinking water.
  (3) Radioactive waste disposal wells
which inject fluids below the  lower-
most formation containing  an  under-
ground source of drinking water  within
one quarter mile of the well bore.
  (b) Class II. Wells which inject fluids:
                                     702

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §146.5
  (1) Which are brought to the surface
in connection with conventional oil or
natural  gas production  and  may be
commingled with  waste waters  from
gas plants which are an integral part of
production operations, unless those wa-
ters are classified as a hazardous waste
at the time of injection.
  (2) For enhanced recovery of oil or
natural gas; and
  (3)  For  storage  of   hydrocarbons
which are liquid at standard tempera-
ture and pressure.
  (c) Class III. Wells which inject  for
extraction of minerals including:
  (1) Mining of sulfur by  the Frasch
process;
  (2) In situ production  of  uranium or
other metals.  This category  includes
only in-situ production from ore bodies
which have  not  been conventionally
mined.  Solution  mining  of  conven-
tional mines such as stopes leaching is
included in Class V.
  (3) Solution  mining of salts or pot-
ash.
  (d) Class IV. (1) Wells used by genera-
tors of hazardous waste or of  radio-
active waste, by owners or operators of
hazardous waste  management  facili-
ties, or by owners  or operators  of radio-
active waste disposal sites to dispose of
hazardous waste or radioactive waste
into a  formation which  within  one
quarter (V4) mile  of the well  contains
an  underground  source of   drinking
water.
  (2) Wells used by generators of haz-
ardous waste  or of radioactive waste,
by  owners or  operators  of hazardous
waste  management facilities, or  by
owners  or  operators  of  radioactive
waste disposal sites to dispose of haz-
ardous  waste   or radioactive  waste
above a formation which  within  one
quarter (1/4) mile  of the well  contains
an  underground  source of  drinking
water.
  (3) Wells used by generators of haz-
ardous waste or owners or operators of
hazardous waste management facilities
to dispose of hazardous  waste,  which
cannot be classified under  §146.05(a)(l)
or §146.05(d) (1) and (2) (e.g., wells used
to dispose of hazardous wastes into or
above a  formation which contains an
aquifer  which has been exempted pur-
suant to §146.04).
  (e)  Class  V.  Injection wells not  in-
cluded in Class I, II, III, or IV. Specific
types of Class V injection wells are also
described in 40  CFR  144.81. Class  V
wells include:
  (1) Air conditioning return flow wells
used to return to the supply aquifer the
water used  for heating or  cooling in a
heat pump;
  (2)   Cesspools   including  multiple
dwelling, community or regional cess-
pools, or other  devices that receive
wastes which have an open bottom and
sometimes  have  perforated  sides. The
UIC requirements do not apply to sin-
gle family residential cesspools nor to
non-residential cesspools which receive
solely sanitary wastes and have the ca-
pacity to serve fewer than 20 persons a
day.
  (3)  Cooling water return  flow  wells
used to inject water previously used for
cooling;
  (4) Drainage wells used to drain sur-
face fluid, primarily storm runoff, into
a subsurface formation;
  (5) Dry wells used for the injection of
wastes into  a subsurface formation;
  (6) Recharge  wells used to replenish
the water in an aquifer;
  (7) Salt water intrusion barrier wells
used to inject water into a fresh water
aquifer to prevent the intrusion of salt
water into the fresh water;
  (8)  Sand backfill and other backfill
wells used to inject a mixture of water
and sand, mill tailings or other  solids
into mined  out portions of  subsurface
mines whether what is injected is a ra-
dioactive waste or not.
  (9) Septic  system wells used to  inject
the waste or effluent  from a multiple
dwelling,  business establishment, com-
munity or regional business establish-
ment septic tank.  The UIC  require-
ments do not  apply to single  family
residential septic system wells, nor to
non-residential  septic  system   wells
which are used  solely for the disposal
of sanitary  waste and have  the capac-
ity to serve fewer  than 20  persons a
day.
  (10)  Subsidence  control  wells (not
used for the purpose of oil  or natural
gas production) used  to inject  fluids
into a non-oil or gas producing zone to
reduce or eliminate subsidence associ-
ated with the overdraft of fresh water;
                                     703

-------
§146.6
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (11) Radioactive waste disposal wells
other than Class IV;
  (12) Injection wells associated with
the recovery of geothermal energy for
heating, aquaculture and production of
electric power.
  (13) Wells used for solution mining of
conventional  mines  such  as  stopes
leaching;
  (14) Wells used to inject spent brine
into the same formation from which it
was   withdrawn after  extraction  of
halogens or their salts;
  (15) Injection wells used in experi-
mental technologies.
  (16) Injection wells used for in situ
recovery of lignite, coal, tar sands, and
oil shale.
[45 PR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
FR 43161, Aug.  27, 1981; 47 FR 4999, Feb. 3,
1982; 64 FR 68573, Dec. 7, 1999]

§ 146.6  Area of review.
  The area of review for each injection
well or each field, project or area of the
State shall be determined according to
either paragraph (a) or (b) of this sec-
tion.  The  Director  may  solicit  input
from  the owners or operators of injec-
tion wells within the State as to which
method  is most appropriate  for each
geographic area or field.
  (a)  Zone of  endangering  influence. (1)
The zone of endangering influence shall
be:
  (i) In  the case  of application(s) for
well permit(s) under §122.38 that  area
the radius of which is the lateral dis-
tance in which the pressures in the in-
jection  zone may cause the migration
of the injection and/or formation fluid
into an  underground source of drinking
water; or
  (ii) In the case of an application for
an area  permit under §122.39,  the proj-
ect area plus a circumscribing area the
width of which is the lateral distance
from the perimeter of the project area,
in which the pressures in  the injection
zone  may  cause the migration of the
injection and/or formation fluid into an
underground source of drinking water.
  (2) Computation of the zone of endan-
gering influence may be based upon the
parameters listed below and should be
calculated for an injection time period
equal to the expected life of the injec-
tion  well  or  pattern.  The  following
modified Theis equation illustrates one
form  which  the mathematical  model
may take.
V2.25KHtV/2
          J
                 siox
where:
     x =
          4;iKH(hw-hboxSpGb)
                   2.3 Q
r=Radius of endangering influence from in-
  jection well (length)
k=Hydraulic  conductivity  of the injection
  zone (length/time)
H=Thickness of the injection zone (length)
t=Time of injection (time)
S=Storage coefficient (dimensionless)
Q=Injection rate (volume/time)
hbo=Observed original hydrostatic head of in-
  jection zone (length) measured from the
  base of the lowermost underground  source
  of drinking water
hw=Hydrostatic head of underground  source
  of drinking water (length) measured from
  the base of the lowest underground  source
  of drinking water
Sp Gn,=Specific gravity of fluid in the injec-
  tion zone (dimensionless)
7t=3.142 (dimensionless)

The above equation  is based on the fol-
lowing assumptions:
  (i) The injection zone  is homogenous
and isotropic;
  (ii)  The  injection zone has  infinite
area extent;
  (iii) The injection  well penetrates the
entire thickness of the injection zone;
  (iv) The well diameter is infinites-
imal  compared to "r" when injection
time is longer than  a  few minutes; and
  (v) The emplacement of fluid into the
injection  zone  creates   instantaneous
increase in pressure.
  (b) Fixed radius. (1) In  the case  of ap-
plication^)  for  well  permit(s)  under
§ 122.38 a fixed radius around the well of
not less than one-fourth (Vi) mile may
be used.
  (2) In the  case  of an application for
an  area  permit  under §122.39 a  fixed
width of not less than  one-fourth (Vi)
mile for the circumscribing area may
be used.
In  determining  the  fixed  radius, the
following factors shall  be taken into
consideration:  Chemistry  of injected
and formation  fluids;   hydrogeology;
population and ground-water use and
                                      704

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                               §146.8
dependence; and historical practices in
the area.
  (c) If the area of review is determined
by a mathematical model pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this section, the per-
missible radius is the  result of such
calculation even if it is less  than one-
fourth 0/4) mile.

[45 FR  42500, June 24, 1980. as amended at 46
PR 43161, Aug.  27, 1981;  47 FR 4999,  Feb. 3,
1982]

§ 146.7  Corrective action.
  In  determining- the  adequacy of cor-
rective action proposed by  the appli-
cant under 40 CFR 144.55 and in deter-
mining the additional steps  needed to
prevent  fluid  movement  into  under-
ground sources of  drinking water,  the
following criteria and factors shall be
considered by the Director:
  (a)  Nature  and  volume of injected
fluid;
  (b) Nature of native fluids or by-prod-
ucts of injection;
  (c) Potentially affected population;
  (d) Geology;
  (e) Hydrology;
  (f)  History of the injection operation;
  (g) Completion and plugging records;
  (h) Abandonment procedures in effect
at the  time the well was abandoned;
and
  (i)  Hydraulic connections with  under-
ground sources of drinking water.

(Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking  Water Act.
Clean Air Act,  Resource Conservation  and
Recovery Act 42 U.S.C. 6905,  6912, 6925, 6927,
6974)

[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980. as amended at 46
PR 43162, Aug 27, 1981; 48 FR 14293,  Apr. 1,
1983]

§ 146.8  Mechanical integrity.
  (a) An injection well has mechanical
integrity if;
  (1) There is no significant leak in  the
casing, tubing or packer; and
  (2) There is no significant fluid move-
ment into an underground  source  of
drinking water through vertical chan-
nels  adjacent  to  the injection well
bore.
  (b)  One  of  the  following  methods
must be used to evaluate the absence of
significant leaks under paragraph (a)(l)
of this section;
  (1) Following an initial pressure test,
monitoring of the tubing-casing annu-
lus pressure with sufficient frequency
to be representative, as determined by
the Director, while maintaining an an-
nulus  pressure  different from atmos-
pheric pressure measured at  the  sur-
face;
  (2) Pressure test with liquid or  gas;
or
  (3)  Records of  monitoring  showing
the absence of  significant changes  in
the   relationship  between  injection
pressure and injection flow rate for the
following Class II enhanced recovery
wells:
  (i) Existing wells completed without
a packer provided that a pressure  test
has been performed and  the data  is
available and provided further that one
pressure test shall be  performed at a
time when the well is shut down and if
the running of such a test will  not
cause   further   loss  of  significant
amounts of oil or gas; or
  (ii)  Existing wells  constructed with-
out a long string casing, but with  sur-
face casing  which terminates at the
base of fresh water provided that local
geological   and  hydrological  features
allow such  construction and provided
further that the annular space shall be
visually inspected. For these wells, the
Director shall prescribe a monitoring
program which will  verify the absence
of significant fluid movement from the
injection zone into an USDW.
  (c)  One  of the  following  methods
must  be used to determine the absence
of significant  fluid  movement  under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section:
  (1) The results of  a  temperature or
noise  log; or
  (2)  For  Class II  only,  cementing
records demonstrating  the presence  of
adequate cement to  prevent such mi-
gration; or
  (3) For Class III wells where the na-
ture of the  casing precludes the use  of
the logging techniques prescribed at
paragraph  (c)(l) of  this  section,  ce-
menting  records  demonstrating  the
presence of adequate  cement to prevent
such migration;
  (4) For Class III wells where the Di-
rector  elects to  rely  on  cementing
records to  demonstrate the absence  of
significant fluid movement, the moni-
toring program prescribed by §146.33(b)
                                     705

-------
§146.9
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
shall be designed to verify the absence
of significant fluid movement.
  (d) The Director may allow the use of
a test to demonstrate mechanical in-
tegrity other than those listed in para-
graphs (b) and (c)(2) of this  section
with the written approval  of the  Ad-
ministrator.  To  obtain approval,  the
Director shall submit a written request
to the Administrator, which shall set
forth  the proposed  test and all tech-
nical  data  supporting its use.  The Ad-
ministrator shall approve the request if
it will reliably demonstrate  the  me-
chanical integrity of wells for which its
use is  proposed. Any alternate method
approved by the Administrator shall be
published  in  the  FEDERAL REGISTER
and may be used in  all States unless its
use is restricted at the time of ap-
proval by the Administrator.
  (e) In conducting and evaluating the
tests  enumerated  in  this  section or
others to be allowed by  the Director,
the owner or operator and the Director
shall apply methods and standards gen-
erally  accepted in  the industry. When
the owner  or operator reports the re-
sults  of mechanical integrity tests to
the Director, he shall include a descrip-
tion of the test(s) and the method(s)
used. In making his/her evaluation, the
Director shall review monitoring  and
other  test data submitted since  the
previous evaluation.
  (f) The Director  may  require addi-
tional  or alternative tests if the results
presented  by the  owner  or operator
under  §146.8(e) are  not satisfactory to
the Director to demonstrate that there
is no  movement of fluid into or be-
tween  USDWs resulting from the injec-
tion activity.
[45 FR 42500, June 24,  1980, as amended at  46
FR 43162,  Aug.  27, 1981; 47 FR 4999, Feb.  3,
1982; 58 FR 63898, Dec. 3, 1993]

§146.9 Criteria for  establishing per-
   mitting priorities.
  In determining priorities for setting
times  for owners or operators to sub-
mit applications for authorization to
inject  under the procedures of §144.31
(a), (c), (g) or §144.22(f), the  Director
shall base these priorities upon consid-
eration of the following factors:
  (a)  Injection  wells known  or  sus-
pected  to be  contaminating under-
ground sources of drinking water;
  (b) Injection wells known to be  in-
jecting  fluids  containing  hazardous
contaminants;
  (c) Likelihood of contamination of
underground sources of drinking water;
  (d) Potentially affected population;
  (e) Injection wells violating  existing
State requirements;
  (f) Coordination with the issuance of
permits required by other State or Fed-
eral permit programs;
  (g) Age and depth of the injection
well; and
  (h) Expiration dates of existing State
permits, if any.
(Clean Water  Act, Safe Drinking Water Act,
Clean Air Act,  Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912, 6925,  6927,
6974)
[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as  amended at 48
FR 14293, Apr. 1, 1983]

§ 146.10 Plugging   and   abandoning
    Class I, II,  III, IV, and V wells.
  (a) Requirements for Class I, II  and
III wells. (1) Prior to abandoning Class
I, II and  III  wells, the well shall be
plugged  with  cement  in a  manner
which will not allow the movement of
fluids  either  into  or between under-
ground  sources  of drinking water.  The
Director may  allow Class III wells to
use other plugging materials if the Di-
rector is satisfied that such materials
will prevent movement of fluids into or
between underground sources of drink-
ing water.
  (2) Placement of the cement  plugs
shall be accomplished by one of the fol-
lowing:
  (i) The Balance method;
  (ii) The Dump Bailer method;
  (iii) The Two-Plug method; or
  (iv) An alternative method approved
by  the Director, which will  reliably
provide a comparable level of protec-
tion to underground sources of drink-
ing water.
  (3) The well  to be abandoned shall be
in a state of static equilibrium  with
the mud weight equalized top to bot-
tom, either  by circulating the mud in
the well at least  once  or by a com-
parable method prescribed by the Di-
rector,  prior to the placement of the
cement plug(s).
  (4) The plugging and abandonment
plan required  in 40 CFR  144.51(o)  and
144.52(a)(6) shall, in the case of a Class
                                     706

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §146.12
III project which underlies or is in an
aquifer which has been exempted under
§146.04, also demonstrate adequate pro-
tection of USDWs. The  Director shall
prescribe aquifer  cleanup  and  moni-
toring where he deems it necessary and
feasible  to insure adequate protection
of USDWs.
  (b) Requirements for Class  IV wells.
Prior to abandoning a  Class IV well,
the owner or operator shall  close the
well  in  accordance  with  40  CFR
144.23(b).
  (c) Requirements  for  Class V wells.
(1) Prior to abandoning a Class V well,
the owner or operator shall  close the
well in  a manner  that prevents  the
movement of fluid containing any con-
taminant into an underground source
of drinking  water,  if the presence of
that contaminant may  cause a viola-
tion of  any primary drinking  water
regulation under 40 CFR part 141 or
may  otherwise adversely  affect  the
health  of persons.  Closure   require-
ments for motor vehicle  waste disposal
wells and large-capacity cesspools are
reiterated at §144.89.
  (2) The owner or operator shall  dis-
pose of or otherwise manage  any soil,
gravel, sludge, liquids, or other mate-
rials removed from  or adjacent to the
well in accordance with all applicable
Federal,  State, and  local regulations
and requirements.
[64 FR 68573, Dec. 7, 1999]

Subpart B—Criteria and Standards
    Applicable to Class I Wells

§ 146.11  Criteria and  standards appli-
   cable to Class I nonhazardous wells.
  This subpart establishes criteria  and
standards  for  underground  injection
control programs  to regulate Class I
nonhazardous wells.
[53 FR 28148, July 26, 1988]

§ 146.12  Construction requirements.
  (a) All Class  I wells shall be sited in
such a fashion that they inject into a
formation which is beneath the lower-
most formation containing, within one
quarter mile  of the well bore, an under-
ground source of drinking water.
  (b) All Class I wells shall  be cased
and cemented to prevent the movement
of fluids into or between underground
sources of drinking water.  The casing
and cement used in the construction of
each  newly  drilled well shall  be de-
signed for the life  expectancy of the
well.  In  determining  and  specifying
casing  and  cementing  requirements,
the following factors  shall be  consid-
ered:
  (1) Depth to the injection zone;
  (2) Injection pressure, external  pres-
sure,  internal pressure, and axial  load-
ing;
  (3) Hole size;
  (4)  Size  and  grade  of  all  casing
strings   (wall   thickness,   diameter,
nominal weight, length, joint specifica-
tion, and construction material);
  (5)  Corrosiveness  of injected fluid,
formation fluids, and temperatures;
  (6)  Lithology  of injection and  con-
fining intervals; and
  (7) Type or grade of cement.
  (c) All Class I injection wells, except
those municipal wells injecting  non-
corrosive wastes,   shall  inject fluids
through  tubing  with a packer set im-
mediately above the injection zone, or
tubing with  an  approved fluid  seal as
an alternative. The tubing, packer, and
fluid  seal shall be designed for  the ex-
pected service.
  (1) The use of  other alternatives to a
packer may  be allowed with the writ-
ten approval of the Director. To obtain
approval, the operator shall submit  a
written request  to the Director, which
shall  set forth the proposed alternative
and all technical  data  supporting its
use. The Director  shall approve the re-
quest if the alternative method will re-
liably provide  a  comparable level of
protection to underground sources of
drinking water.  The Director may ap-
prove an alternative method solely for
an individual well  or for general use.
  (2) In  determining and specifying re-
quirements for tubing, packer, or alter-
natives  the following  factors shall be
considered:
  (i) Depth of setting;
  (ii)  Characteristics of  injection  fluid
(chemical content, corrosiveness,  and
density);
  (iii) Injection pressure;
  (iv)  Annular pressure:
  (v) Rate, temperature  and volume of
injected fluid; and
  (vi)  Size of casing.
                                     707

-------
§146.13
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (d) Appropriate  logs and other tests
shall be conducted during the drilling
and construction of new Class I wells.
A descriptive report interpreting the
results  of such logs and tests shall be
prepared by a knowledgeable log ana-
lyst and submitted to the  Director. At
a minimum,  such logs  and tests shall
include:
  (1) Deviation checks on all holes con-
structed by first drilling a pilot hole,
and then enlarging the pilot hole by
reaming  or   another  method.   Such
checks shall be at sufficiently frequent
intervals  to assure that vertical ave-
nues for fluid migration in the form of
diverging holes are not created during
drilling.
  (2) Such other logs and tests as may
be needed after taking into account the
availability of similar data in the area
of the  drilling site, the  construction
plan, and the need for additional infor-
mation, that may arise from time to
time as the  construction of the well
progresses. In determining which logs
and tests shall be required,  the fol-
lowing logs shall be considered for use
in the following situations:
  (i)  For surface  casing  intended to
protect underground sources of drink-
ing water:
  (A)  Resistivity,   spontaneous poten-
tial, and caliper logs before the casing
is installed; and
  (B) A cement bond, temperature, or
density log after the casing is set and
cemented.
  (ii) For intermediate and long strings
of  casing   intended   to   facilitate
injection:
  (A)  Resistivity,  spontaneous poten-
tial, porosity, and gamma ray logs  be-
fore the casing is installed;
  (B) Fracture finder logs; and
  (C) A cement bond, temperature, or
density log after the casing is set and
cemented.
  (e) At a minimum, the following in-
formation concerning the injection for-
mation shall  be  determined or  cal-
culated for new Class I wells:
  (1) Fluid pressure;
  (2) Temperature;
  (3) Fracture pressure;
  (4) Other physical and chemical char-
acteristics of the injection matrix; and
  (5) Physical and chemical character-
istics of the formation fluids.

[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
FR 43162, Aug. 27, 1981]

§ 146.13 Operating, monitoring and re-
   porting requirements.
  (a) Operating requirements.  Operating
requirements  shall   at a  minimum,
specify that:
  (1) Except during  stimulation  injec-
tion pressure at the  wellhead shall not
exceed a maximum which shall be  cal-
culated so as  to assure that  the pres-
sure in the injection zone during injec-
tion does  not  initiate new fractures or
propagate existing fractures  in the in-
jection zone. In no case shall injection
pressure initiate fractures in the con-
fining  zone  or cause  the movement of
injection  or formation fluids into an
underground source of drinking water.
  (2) Injection between the outermost
casing protecting underground sources
of drinking  water and the well bore is
prohibited.
  (3) Unless an alternative to a packer
has been approved under §146.12(c), the
annulus between  the  tubing arid  the
long string of casings shall  be  filled
with a fluid approved by the Director
and  a  pressure, also approved by  the
Director,  shall  be maintained on  the
annulus.
  (b)  Monitoring  requirements.   Moni-
toring requirements  shall, at a min-
imum, include:
  (1) The analysis of the injected fluids
with sufficient frequency to  yield  rep-
resentative  data of  their  characteris-
tics;
  (2) Installation and use of continuous
recording devices to monitor injection
pressure, flow rate and volume, and the
pressure on the annulus between  the
tubing and the long string of casing;
  (3) A demonstration of mechanical
integrity  pursuant to  §146.8 at least
once every five years during  the life of
the well; and
  (4) The type, number and location of
wells within the area of review to be
used to monitor any migration of fluids
into and pressure in the underground
sources of drinking water, the param-
eters to be measured and the frequency
of monitoring.
                                     708

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §146.14
  (c) Reporting requirements. Reporting
requirements  shall,  at a minimum, in-
clude:
  (1) Quarterly reports to  the Director
on:
  (i) The physical, chemical and other
relevant  characteristics  of  injection
fluids;
  (ii)  Monthly average,  maximum and
minimum values for injection pressure,
flow  rate  and  volume,  and annular
pressure; and
  (iii)  The results of monitoring  pre-
scribed under paragraph (b)(4) of  this
section.
  (2) Reporting the  results,  with the
first quarterly report after the comple-
tion, of:
  (i) Periodic tests of mechanical in-
tegrity;
  (ii)  Any  other test of the injection
well conducted by the permittee if re-
quired by the Director; and
  (iii) Any well work over.
  (d) Ambient monitoring. (1) Based  on a
site-specific assessment of the poten-
tial for fluid movement from the  well
or injection zone  and on the potential
value  of  monitoring  wells to detect
such movement,  the Director shall re-
quire the owner or operator to develop
a monitoring program. At a minimum,
the Director shall require monitoring
of the  pressure buildup in the injection
zone  annually,  including  at a  min-
imum, a shut down of the  well for a
time sufficient to conduct a valid ob-
servation of the pressure fall-off curve.
  (2) When  prescribing a  monitoring
system the Director may also require:
  (i) Continuous monitoring for pres-
sure changes in the first aquifer over-
lying the confining  zone. When such a
well is installed,  the owner or operator
shall, on a quarterly basis, sample the
aquifer and  analyze for  constituents
specified by the Director;
  (ii)  The use of  indirect, geophysical
techniques to  determine the position of
the waste front, the water quality  in a
formation designated by the Director,
or to provide other site specific data;
  (iii)  Periodic   monitoring  of  the
ground water  quality in the first aqui-
fer overlying the injection zone;
  (iv)  Periodic   monitoring  of  the
ground water  quality in the lowermost
USDW; and
  (v)  Any  additional  monitoring  nec-
essary to determine whether fluids are
moving into or between USDWs.

[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
FR 43162, Aug. 27, 1981; 47 FR 32129, July 26,
1982; 53 FR 28148, July 26, 1988]

§ 146.14  Information to be considered
   by the Director.
  This section  sets forth the informa-
tion  which must be considered by the
Director in authorizing Class I wells.
For an existing or converted new Class
I well the Director may rely on the ex-
isting permit file for those items of in-
formation listed below which  are cur-
rent  and accurate in  the file.  For  a
newly drilled Class I well, the Director
shall require the submission of all the
information listed below. For both ex-
isting  and new Class  I  wells  certain
maps,  cross-sections,  tabulations  of
wells within the  area of review and
other data may be included  in  the ap-
plication by reference provided they
are current, readily available to the Di-
rector (for example, in the permitting
agency's files)  and sufficiently identi-
fied  to  be  retrieved.  In cases  where
EPA issues the permit all the informa-
tion  in this section must be  submitted
to the Administrator.
  (a) Prior to the issuance of a permit
for an existing Class I well to operate
or the construction or conversion of a
new Class I well the Director shall con-
sider the following:
  (1) Information required  in 40  CFR
144.31 and 144.31(g);
  (2)   A  map  showing  the  injection
well(s) for which a permit is sought and
the applicable  area of review.  Within
the area of review, the map must show
the number, or name,  and location  of
all producing wells, dry holes,  surface
bodies of water, springs, mines (surface
and subsurface), quarries, water wells
and other pertinent surface features in-
cluding residences and roads. The map
should also show faults, if  known or
suspected.  Only information  of public
record is required to  be included on
this map;
  (3)  A tabulation of data on all wells
within the area of review which pene-
trate into the proposed injection zone.
Such data shall include a  description  of
each  well's  type,  construction,  date
                                     709

-------
§146.21
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
drilled, location, depth, record of plug-
ging- and/or completion, and any addi-
tional  information  the Director may
require;
  (4) Maps and cross sections indicating
the general vertical and lateral  limits
of all underground sources of drinking
water within the area of review, their
position relative to the injection  for-
mation  and the  direction  of  water
movement,  where known, in  each un-
derground  source  of  drinking  water
which may be affected by the proposed
injection;
  (5) Maps  and cross sections  detailing
the geologic structure of the local area;
  (6) Generalized maps and cross  sec-
tions illustrating the regional geologic
setting;
  (7) Proposed operating data:
  (i) Average and maximum daily rate
and volume of the fluid to be injected;
  (ii) Average and maximum  injection
pressure; and
  (iii)  Source and  an analysis of the
chemical, physical, radiological and bi-
ological characteristics  of  injection
fluids;
  (8) Proposed  formation testing pro-
gram  to  obtain  an analysis of  the
chemical,  physical and  radiological
characteristics of and  other  informa-
tion on the receiving formation;
  (9) Proposed stimulation program;
  (10) Proposed injection procedure;
  (11) Schematic or other appropriate
drawings of the surface and subsurface
construction details of the well.
  (12) Contingency plans to cope with
all shut-ins  or  well failures  so  as to
prevent  migration of fluids into  any
underground source of drinking water;
  (13) Plans (including maps) for meet-
ing the monitoring requirements in
§146.13(b);
  (14) For wells within the area  of re-
view  which penetrate  the  injection
zone but are not properly completed or
plugged, the corrective  action proposed
to be taken under 40 CPR 144.55;
  (15) Construction  procedures includ-
ing a cementing and casing program,
logging procedures, deviation checks,
and a drilling,  testing,  and coring pro-
gram; and
  (16) A certificate  that the applicant
has  assured,  through  a performance
bond or other  appropriate means, the
resources necessary to  close,  plug or
abandon the well as required by 40 CFR
122.42(g).
  (b) Prior to granting approval for the
operation of a Class I well the Director
shall  consider  the following informa-
tion:
  (1) All available logging and testing
program data on the well;
  (2)  A demonstration of mechanical
integrity pursuant to  § 146.8;
  (3)  The anticipated maximum pres-
sure and  flow  rate at  which the per-
mittee will operate;
  (4) The results of the formation test-
ing program;
  (5) The actual injection procedure;
  (6)  The  compatibility  of injected
waste with fluids in the injection zone
and minerals in both the injection zone
and the confining zone; and
  (7) The status of corrective action on
defective wells  in the  area of review.
  (c) Prior to granting approval for the
plugging and abandonment of a Class I
well the Director shall consider the fol-
lowing information:
  (1) The type  and number  of plugs to
be used;
  (2)  The placement  of each plug  in-
cluding the elevation of the top  and
bottom;
  (3) The type  and grade  and quantity
of cement to be used;
  (4) The method for  placement of the
plugs; and
  (5) The procedure to be used to meet
the requirement of §146.10(c).
(Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act,
Clean  Air Act,  Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act: 42 U.S.C.  6905, 6912, 6925,  6927,
6974)
[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
FR 43162, Aug. 27, 1981;  48 FR 14293, Apr. 1,
1983]

Subpart C—Criteria and Standards
    Applicable  to Class II Wells

§146.21 Applicability.
  This subpart  establishes criteria and
standards  for  underground  injection
control programs to  regulate  Class II
wells.

§ 146.22 Construction requirements.
  (a)  All  new  Class  II wells shall be
sited  in such a  fashion that they  inject
into  a  formation which is separated
from  any USDW by  a confining zone
                                     710

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §146.22
that  is free of known open  faults or
fractures within the area of review.
  (b)(l) All Class II injection wells shall
be  cased  and  cemented  to  prevent
movement of fluids into or between un-
derground sources of drinking water.
The casing and cement used in the con-
struction of each newly  drilled well
shall  be designed for the life expect-
ancy  of the well. In  determining and
specifying casing and cementing re-
quirements, the following factors shall
be considered:
  (i) Depth to the injection zone;
  (ii)   Depth  to  the  bottom  of all
USDWs; and
  (iii) Estimated  maximum and  aver-
age injection pressures;
  (2) In addition the Director may con-
sider  information on:
  (i) Nature of formation fluids;
  (ii)  Lithology of injection  and con-
fining zones;
  (iii) External pressure, internal pres-
sure,  and axial loading;
  (iv) Hole size;
  (v)   Size  and  grade of  all  casing
strings; and
  (vi) Class of cement.
  (c) The requirements in paragraph (b)
of this section need  not apply to exist-
ing or newly converted Class  II  wells
located in existing fields if:
  (1)  Regulatory  controls  for casing
and cementing existed for  those  wells
at the time of drilling and  those  wells
are in compliance with those controls;
and
  (2)  Well injection  will not  result in
the movement of fluids into an under-
ground source of drinking water  so as
to  create  a significant  risk to the
health of persons.
  (d) The requirements in paragraph (b)
of this section need not apply to newly
drilled wells in existing1 fields if;
  (1)  They  meet  the  requirements of
the State for casing  and cementing ap-
plicable to  that field at the  time of
submission of the State program to the
Administrator; and
  (2) Well injection  will not result in
the movement of fluids into an under-
ground source of drinking water  so as
to create  a significant  risk to the
health of persons.
  (e) Where a State  did not have regu-
latory controls for casing and cement-
ing prior to the time of the  submission
of the State program to  the  Adminis-
trator, the Director need not apply the
casing and cementing requirements in
paragraph (b) of this section if he sub-
mits as a part of his application for pri-
macy, an appropriate plan for casing
and cementing of existing, newly con-
verted, and newly drilled wells in exist-
ing fields,  and the Administrator ap-
proves the plan.
  (f) Appropriate logs and other tests
shall  be conducted during the drilling
and construction of new Class II wells.
A descriptive report interpreting  the
results  of  that portion of those logs
and tests which  specifically  relate to
(1) an USDW and the confining zone ad-
jacent to it, and (2) the injection and
adjacent formations shall be  prepared
by  a  knowledgeable log  analyst and
submitted  to the director. At a min-
imum, these  logs  and tests  shall in-
clude:
  (1) Deviation checks on all holes con-
structed by first drilling  a pilot hole
and then enlarging the pilot hole, by
reaming  or  another  method.  Such
checks shall be at sufficiently frequent
intervals to  assure that  vertical ave-
nues for fluid movement in the form of
diverging holes are not created during
drilling.
  (2) Such other logs and tests as may
be needed after taking into account the
availability of similar data in the area
of the drilling site,  the  construction
plan,  and   the  need  for additional
information that may arise from time
to time as the construction of the well
progresses. In determining which logs
and tests  shall  be required  the fol-
lowing shall be considered by the  Di-
rector in  setting  logging  and testing
requirements:
  (i)  For  surface  casing  intended to
protect underground  sources of drink-
ing water in areas  where the lithology
has not been determined:
  (A)  Electric and caliper  logs before
casing is installed; and
  (B)  A cement bond, temperature, or
density log after the casing is set and
cemented.
  (ii)  for intermediate and long strings
of casing intended to facilitate injec-
tion:
  (A)  Electric porosity and gamma ray
logs before the casing is installed;
  (B) Fracture finder logs; and
                                     711

-------
§146.23
          40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
  (C)  A cement bond, temperature,  or
density log after the casing is set and
cemented.
  (g) At  a  minimum, the following in-
formation concerning the injection for-
mation  shall  be  determined  or  cal-
culated  for new  Class II  wells   or
projects:
  (1) Fluid pressure:
  (2) Estimated fracture pressure;
  (3) Physical and  chemical character-
istics of the injection zone.
[45 FR 42500,  June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
FR  43162,  Aug. 27, 1981; 47 FR 5000, Feb. 3,
1982]

§ 146.23  Operating, monitoring, and re-
    porting requirements.
  (a)  Operating requirements. Operating
requirements  shall,  at  a  minimum,
specify that:
  (1) Injection pressure at the  wellhead
shall  not  exceed  a  maximum which
shall be calculated so as to assure that
the pressure during injection  does not
initiate new fractures or propagate ex-
isting fractures in the  confining zone
adjacent to the USDWs. In  no case
shall   injection  pressure  cause  the
movement  of  injection  or  formation
fluids  into  an underground source  of
drinking water
  (2) Injection  between the  outermost
casing protecting underground sources
of drinking water and the well bore
shall be prohibited.
  (b)  Monitoring  requirements.  Moni-
toring requirements shall,  at a min-
imum, include:
  (1) Monitoring of the  nature of in-
jected fluids at time  intervals suffi-
ciently  frequent  to  yield  data  rep-
resentative of their characteristics;
  (2) Observation of injection  pressure,
flow rate,  and cumulative  volume  at
least with the following frequencies:
  (i) Weekly for produced fluid disposal
operations;
  (ii)  Monthly for enhanced  recovery
operations;
  (iii) Daily during the injection of liq-
uid  hydrocarbons  and  injection  for
withdrawal of stored hydrocarbons; and
  (iv) Daily during the injection phase
of cyclic steam operations
And recording  of one observation of in-
jection pressure, flow  rate  and cumu-
lative volume  at reasonable  intervals
no greater than 30 days.
  (3)  A demonstration  of  mechanical
integrity  pursuant  to §146.8  at least
once every five years during the life of
the injection well;
  (4) Maintenance of the results of all
monitoring until the next permit re-
view (see 40 CFR  144.52(a)(5)); and
  (5)  Hydrocarbon  storage  and   en-
hanced recovery  may be monitored on
a field or project basis rather than on
an  individual well  basis by manifold
monitoring. Manifold monitoring  may
be used in cases  of facilities consisting
of more than one injection well, oper-
ating with a common manifold. Sepa-
rate monitoring  systems for each  well
are not required provided the owner/op-
erator  demonstrates  that  manifold
monitoring is comparable to individual
well monitoring.
  (c) Reporting requirements. (1) Report-
ing requirements shall at a minimum
include an annual report to the Direc-
tor summarizing the  results of moni-
toring required under paragraph (b) of
this section. Such summary shall in-
clude  monthly  records  of  injected
fluids, and any major changes in char-
acteristics or sources of injected fluid.
Previously submitted information  may
be included by reference.
  (2)  Owners  or  operators  of hydro-
carbon storage and enhanced recovery
projects  may  report  on  a  field  or
project basis rather than an individual
well basis where manifold monitoring
is used.
(Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act,
Clean Air  Act, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act; 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912, 6925, 6927,
6974)
[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
FR 43162, Aug.  27,  1981; 47 FR 5000, Feb. 3,
1982; 48 FR 14293, Apr.  1, 1983; 48 FR 31404,
July 8, 1983]

§146.24 Information to be considered
    by the Director.
  This section sets  forth the informa-
tion which must be  considered by the
Director in authorizing Class  II wells.
Certain maps, cross-sections,  tabula-
tions of wells within the area of review,
and other data may be included in the
application by reference provided  they
are current, readily available to the Di-
rector (for example,  in the permitting
agency's  files) and sufficiently identi-
fied to be retrieved. In cases where
                                      712

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §146.24
EPA issues the permit, all the informa-
tion in this section is to be submitted
to the Administrator.
  (a) Prior to the issuance of a permit
for an existing Class II well to operate
or the construction or conversion of a
new Class II well the  Director  shall
consider the following:
  (1) Information required in 40 CFR
144.31 and 144.31(g);
  (2) A map showing the injection well
or project area for which a permit is
sought and the applicable area of re-
view. Within the area of review, the
map must show the number or name
and location of all existing producing
wells, injection wells, abandoned wells,
dry holes, and  water wells. The map
may also show surface bodies of waters,
mines (surface  and subsurface), quar-
ries  and  other pertinent  surface  fea-
tures including- residences and  roads,
and faults if known or suspended. Only
information of public record and perti-
nent information known to the appli-
cant is required to be included on this
map.  This requirement does not apply
to existing Class II wells; and
  (3) A tabulation of data reasonably
available from public records or other-
wise  known  to  the  applicant  on all
wells within  the  area  of review in-
cluded on the map required under para-
graph (a)(2) of this section which pene-
trate  the proposed injection zone or, in
the case of Class II wells operating over
the fracture  pressure  of the injection
formation, all known wells within the
area of review which penetrate forma-
tions  affected by the increase in pres-
sure. Such data shall include a descrip-
tion of each  well's type, construction,
date drilled,  location, depth, record of
plugging and complete, and any  addi-
tional information  the Director may
require. In cases where the information
would be repetitive and the wells are of
similar age, type, and construction the
Director may elect to only require data
on a  representative number of  wells.
This requirement does not apply to ex-
isting Class II wells.
  (4) Proposed operating data:
  (i) Average and maximum daily rate
and volume of fluids to be injected.
  (ii)  Average and maximum injection
pressure; and
  (iii) Source and an appropriate anal-
ysis of the chemical and physical char-
acteristics of the injection fluid.
  (5)  Appropriate geological data  on
the injection zone and confining zone
including  lithologic  description,  geo-
logical name, thickness and depth;
  (6) Geologic name and depth to bot-
tom  of  all   underground  sources  of
drinking water which may be affected
by the injection;
  (7)  Schematic  or  other appropriate
drawings of the surface and subsurface
construction details of the well;
  (8) In the case of new injection wells
the  corrective action proposed  to  be
taken by the applicant under 40 CPR
122.44;
  (9) A  certificate that the  applicant
has  assured  through  a  performance
bond or  other appropriate means, the
resources necessary  to  close plug  or
abandon the well as required by 40 CPR
122.42(g);
  (b) In addition the Director may con-
sider the following:
  (1) Proposed formation  testing pro-
gram to  obtain the  information re-
quired by §146.22(g);
  (2) Proposed stimulation program;
  (3) Proposed injection procedure;
  (4)  Proposed  contingency  plans,  if
any, to cope  with well failures so as to
prevent  migration  of contaminating
fluids into an underground source  of
drinking water;
  (5) Plans for meeting the monitoring
requirements of §146.23(b).
  (c) Prior to granting approval for the
operation of  a Class II well the Direc-
tor shall consider the following infor-
mation:
  (1) All available logging and testing
program data on the well;
  (2)  A demonstration of mechanical
integrity pursuant to § 146.8;
  (3) The anticipated maximum pres-
sure and flow rate at which the per-
mittee will operate.
  (4) The results of the formation  test-
ing program;
  (5) The actual  injection procedure;
and
  (6) For new wells the status of correc-
tive action on defective wells  in the
area of review.
  (d) Prior to granting approval for the
plugging and abandonment of a Class II
                                     713

-------
§146.31
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
well the Director shall consider the fol-
lowing information:
  (1) The type, and number of plugs to
be used;
  (2) The  placement of each  plug in-
cluding the elevation of top and bot-
tom;
  (3) The type, grade, and quantity of
cement to be used;
  (4) The method of placement of the
plugs; and
  (5) The procedure to be used to meet
the requirements of §146.10(c).
(Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking- Water Act,
Clean Air Act, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act: 42 U.S.C. 6905. 6912,  6925, 6927,
6974)
[45 PR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
FR 43162, Aug.  27,  1981; 47  FR 5000, Feb. 3,
1982; 48 FR 14293, Apr. 1, 1983]

Subpart D—Criteria and Standards
    Applicable to Class III Wells

§ 146.31 Applicability.
  This subpart establishes criteria and
standards  for underground  injection
control programs to  regulate Class  III
wells.

§ 146.32 Construction requirements.
  (a) All new Class III  wells  shall be
cased and cemented to prevent the mi-
gration of fluids into or between under-
ground sources of drinking water. The
Director may waive the cementing re-
quirement  for new  wells in  existing
projects or portions of existing projects
where he has substantial evidence that
no   contamination   of  underground
sources of drinking water would result.
The casing and cement used in the con-
struction  of  each  newly drilled well
shall be  designed for the life expect-
ancy of the well. In determining  and
specifying  casing and  cementing1 re-
quirements, the following factors shall
be considered:
  (1) Depth to the injection zone;
  (2) Injection pressure, external pres-
sure, internal pressure, axial  loading,
etc.:
  (3) Hole size;
  (4)  Size   and  grade   of  all casing
strings  (wall  thickness,   diameter,
nominal weight, length,  joint specifica-
tion, and construction material);
  (5) Corrosiveness  of  injected  fluids
and formation fluids;
  (6) Lithology of injection  and con-
fining zones; and
  (7) Type and grade of cement.
  (b) Appropriate  logs and  other tests
shall be  conducted during the drilling
and construction of new Class III wells.
A  descriptive  report interpreting the
results of such logs and tests shall be
prepared by a  knowledgeable log ana-
lyst and submitted to the Director. The
logs and  tests appropriate to each type
of Class  III well  shall be  determined
based on the intended function,  depth,
construction and other characteristics
of the well, availability of similar data
in the area of the drilling site and the
need for  additional  information that
may arise from time to time as the
construction of the well progresses. De-
viation  checks shall be conducted  on
all holes where pilot holes and reaming
are used,  unless the hole will be cased
and cemented by circulating cement to
the surface. Where  deviation  checks
are necessary they shall  be conducted
at sufficiently frequent intervals to as-
sure that vertical  avenues for fluid mi-
gration in the  form of diverging holes
are not created during drillings.
  (c) Where  the injection zone is a for-
mation which is naturally  water-bear-
ing  the   following information con-
cerning the  injection zone shall  be de-
termined or calculated  for new Class
III wells or projects:
  (1) Fluid pressure;
  (2) Fracture pressure; and
  (3) Physical and  chemical character-
istics of the  formation fluids.
  (d) Where  the injection formation  is
not a water-bearing formation, the in-
formation in  paragraph  (c)(2) of this
section must be submitted.
  (e) Where  injection is into a forma-
tion which  contains water with less
than 10,000 mg/1 TDS monitoring wells
shall be  completed into  the injection
zone and into any underground sources
of drinking  water  above  the injection
zone which  could  be affected by the
mining operation. These wells shall be
located  in such a  fashion as  to  detect
any excursion of injection fluids, proc-
ess by-products,  or formation  fluids
outside the  mining area or  zone. If the
operation may be affected by subsid-
ence or catastrophic collapse the moni-
toring  wells shall be located so that
they will not be physically affected.
                                     714

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §146.33
  (f) Where injection  is into a forma-
tion which does not contain water with
less than  10,000 mg/1 TDS, no moni-
toring wells are necessary in the injec-
tion stratum.
  (g)  Where  the injection  wells  pene-
trate an USDW in an area subject  to
subsidence or catastrophic collapse an
adequate  number of monitoring  wells
shall be completed into the USDW  to
detect  any   movement  of  injected
fluids, process  by-products or forma-
tion fluids into the USDW. The moni-
toring wells shall be located  outside
the  physical  influence  of  the  subsid-
ence or catastrophic collapse.
  (h) In determining the number, loca-
tion,  construction  and  frequency  of
monitoring of the monitoring wells the
following criteria shall be considered:
  (1)  The  population relying  on the
USDW affected or potentially affected
by the injection operation;
  (2) The proximity of the injection op-
eration  to points  of withdrawal  of
drinking water;
  (3) The  local geology and hydrology;
  (4)  The  operating  pressures  and
whether a negative pressure gradient is
being maintained;
  (5) The nature and volume of the in-
jected fluid,  the formation water, and
the process by-products;  and
  (6) The injection well density.
[45 PR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
FR  43163, Aug. 27, 1981; 47  FR 5000, Feb. 3,
1982]

§ 146.33  Operating, monitoring, and re-
    porting requirements.
  (a) Operating requirements. Operating
requirements prescribed  shall,  at  a
minimum, specify that:
  (1) Except during well stimulation in-
jection pressure at the  wellhead  shall
be calculated so as to assure that the
pressure in the injection zone during
injection  does not initiate new  frac-
tures or propagate existing  fractures in
the injection zone. In no case, shall in-
jection pressure initiate fractures  in
the confining zone or  cause the migra-
tion of injection  or  formation fluids
into an underground source of drinking
water.
  (2) Injection between  the outermost
casing protecting  underground  sources
of drinking water and the well bore is
prohibited.
  (b)  Monitoring  requirements.  Moni-
toring requirements shall, at  a min-
imum, specify:
  (1) Monitoring of the nature of in-
jected fluids with sufficient frequency
to  yield  representative  data  on  its
characteristics. Whenever the injection
fluid is modified to the extent that the
analysis required by §146.34(a)(7)(iii) is
incorrect or incomplete, a new analysis
as required by §146.34(a)(7)(iii) shall be
provided to the Director.
  (2) Monitoring of injection  pressure
and either flow rate or volume semi-
monthly, or metering and daily record-
ing of injected and produced  fluid vol-
umes as appropriate.
  (3) Demonstration of mechanical in-
tegrity pursuant  to  §146.08  at  least
once every five years during the life of
the well for salt solution mining.
  (4) Monitoring of the fluid level  in
the   injection   zone  semi-monthly,
where appropriate  and monitoring  of
the  parameters  chosen   to   measure
water quality in the monitoring wells
required by §146.32(e), semi-monthly.
  (5) Quarterly monitoring of wells re-
quired by §146.32(g).
  (6) All Class III wells may be mon-
itored on a field or project basis rather
than an individual  well basis by mani-
fold monitoring. Manifold monitoring
may be used in cases of facilities con-
sisting of more than one injection well,
operating  with a  common manifold.
Separate monitoring systems for each
well  are  not  required provided the
owner/operator   demonstrates   that
manifold monitoring is comparable to
individual well monitoring.
  (c) Reporting requirements. Reporting
requirements shall, at a minimum, in-
clude:
  (1) Quarterly reporting to the Direc-
tor on required monitoring;
  (2) Results  of  mechanical  integrity
and any other periodic test required by
the Director  reported with  the first
regular quarterly report after the com-
pletion of the test; and
  (3) Monitoring may be reported on a
project or  field basis rather than indi-
vidual well basis where manifold moni-
toring is used.

[45 FR 42500, June 24,  1980, as amended at 46
FR 43163, Aug. 27, 1981; 46 FR 5001, Feb. 3,
1982; 48 FR 31404, July 8, 1983]
                                     715

-------
§146.34
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 146.34 Information to be considered
    by the Director.
  This section  sets forth the informa-
tion which must be considered by the
Director in authorizing Class III wells.
Certain maps,  cross sections, tabula-
tions of wells within the area of review,
and other data may be included in the
application by  reference provided they
are current, readily available to the Di-
rector (for example, in the permitting
agency's files)  and sufficiently identi-
fied to be retrieved.  In  cases  where
EPA issues the permit, all the informa-
tion in this section must be submitted
to the Administrator.
  (a) Prior to the issuance of a permit
for an existing  Class III well or area to
operate or the construction  of a new
Class III well  the Director  shall con-
sider the following:
  (1) Information required in 40 CFR
144.31 and 144.31(g);
  (2) A map showing the injection well
or project  area for  which a permit  is
sought and the applicable area  of re-
view. Within the area of review, the
map must  show  the number or name
and location  of all existing producing
wells, injection wells,  abandoned wells,
dry  holes,  public water systems  and
water  wells.  The  map may  also  show
surface bodies of waters, mines (surface
and  subsurface),  quarries and  other
pertinent   surface  features   including
residences  and roads,  and  faults  if
known or suspected. Only information
of public record and pertinent informa-
tion known to the applicant is required
to be included on this map.
  (3) A tabulation of  data reasonably
available from  public records or  other-
wise known to the applicant on wells
within the area of review included on
the  map   required  under  paragraph
(a)(2) of this section  which penetrate
the proposed injection zone. Such data
shall  include  a description  of  each
well's  type, construction, date drilled,
location, depth, record of plugging and
completion, and  any  additional  infor-
mation the Director  may require. In
cases where the information would be
repetitive and  the wells are of similar
age, type, and  construction  the  Direc-
tor may elect to only require data on a
representative number of wells.
  (4) Maps and cross sections indicating
the vertical limits of all underground
sources of drinking water within the
area of review,  their position relative
to the injection formation, and the di-
rection  of  water  movement,  where
known, in every underground source of
drinking water which may be affected
by the proposed injection:
  (5) Maps and cross sections detailing
the geologic structure of the local area;
  (6) Generalized map  and cross  sec-
tions illustrating the regional geologic
setting;
  (7) Proposed operating data:
  (i) Average and maximum daily rate
and volume of fluid to be injected;
  (ii) Average and  maximum injection
pressure; and
  (iii)  Qualitative analysis and ranges
in concentrations of all constituents of
injected fluids. The applicant may re-
quest Federal confidentiality as speci-
fied  in 40 CFR part 2.  If the informa-
tion is proprietary an  applicant  may,
in lieu of the ranges in concentrations,
choose to submit maximum concentra-
tions which shall not be  exceeded. In
such a  case the applicant shall retain
records of the undisclosed concentra-
tions and provide them upon request to
the  Director  as  part of any  enforce-
ment investigation.
  (8) Proposed formation  testing  pro-
gram  to  obtain the  information  re-
quired by §146.32(c).
  (9) Proposed stimulation program;
  (10) Proposed injection procedure;
  (11) Schematic or other appropriate
drawings of the  surface and subsurface
construction details of the well;
  (12) Plans (including maps)  for meet-
ing  the monitoring requirements of
§146.33(b);
  (13) Expected changes in pressure, na-
tive fluid  displacement,  direction of
movement of injection fluid;
  (14) Contingency  plans to cope with
all shut-ins or  well  failures so as to
prevent  the  migration  of  contami-
nating fluids into underground sources
of drinking water:
  (15) A certificate that the  applicant
has  assured,  through  a  performance
bond, or other appropriate means, the
resources necessary to close,  plug, or
abandon the well as required by 40 CFR
144.52(a)(7) and
  (16) The corrective action proposed to
be taken under 40 CFR 144.55.
                                     716

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             § 146.61
  (b) Prior to granting approval for the
operation of a, Class III well the Direc-
tor shall  consider the following infor-
mation:
  (1) All available logging and  testing
data on the well;
  (2) A satisfactory demonstration of
mechanical integrity for all new wells
and for all existing salt solution wells
pursuant to §146.08;
  (3) The anticipated  maximum pres-
sure and  flow rate at  which the per-
mittee will operate;
  (4) The results of the formation test-
ing program;
  (5) The actual injection  procedures;
and
  (6) The status  of corrective action on
defective wells in the area of review.
  (c) Prior to granting approval for the
plugging and abandonment of a Class
III well the Director shall consider the
following information:
  (1) The  type and number  of plugs to
be used;
  (2) The placement  of each plug in-
cluding the elevation of the top  and
bottom;
  (3) The  type, grade, and quantity of
cement to be used;
  (4) The  method of placement of the
plugs; and
  (5) The procedure to be used to meet
the reauirements of § 146.10(c).
(Clean Water Act,  Safe Drinking Water  Act,
Clean Air  Act, Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912, 6925, 6927,
6974)
[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 46
PR 43163, Aug. 27, 1981; 47  FR  5001, Feb. 3,
1982; 48 FR 14293, Apr. 1, 1983]

Subpart E—Criteria and Standards
     Applicable to Class IV  Injec-
     tion Wells [Reserved]

Subpart F—Criteria and Standards
     Applicable  to  Class V  Injec-
     tion Wells

§ 146.51 Applicability.
  This subpart sets  forth criteria  and
standards  for  underground injection
control programs to regulate all injec-
tion  not regulated in subparts B, C, D,
and B.
  (a) Generally,  wells  covered  by this
subpart  inject  non-hazardous   fluids
into or above formations that contain
underground sources of drinking water.
It includes all wells listed in §146.5(e)
but is not limited to those types of in-
jection wells.
  (b) It also includes wells not covered
in Class IV that inject radioactive  ma-
terial listed in 10 CFB part 20, appendix
B, table II, column 2.

[45 FR 42500, June 24, 1980, as amended at 47
PR 5001, Feb. 3, 1982]

Subpart G—Criteria and Standards
    Applicable  to  Class I  Haz-
    ardous Waste Injection Wells

  SOURCE: 53 FR 28148, July 26,  1988, unless
otherwise noted.

§146.61  Applicability

  (a) This subpart establishes criteria
and standards for underground  injec-
tion control programs to regulate Class
I hazardous waste injection  wells.  Un-
less otherwise noted this subpart sup-
plements the requirements of subpart
A and applies instead of subpart B to
Class I hazardous waste injection wells.
  (b) Definitions.
  Cone  of influence  means  that  area
around the well within which increased
injection zone pressures caused by in-
jection  into the hazardous waste injec-
tion well  would be sufficient to drive
fluids into an underground  source of
drinking water (USDW).
  Existing well means a Class  I well
which was authorized  prior  to August
25, 1988, by an approved State program,
or an EPA-administered program or  a
well which has become a Class I well as
a result of a change in the definition of
the injected waste which would render
the waste  hazardous  under §261.3 of
this part.
  Injection interval means that part of
the injection zone in which the  well is
screened, or in which the waste is oth-
erwise directly emplaced.
  New well means any Class I  hazardous
waste injection well which is  not an ex-
isting' well.
  Transmissive fault or fracture is a fault
or fracture that  has sufficient perme-
ability  and  vertical  extent  to  allow
fluids to move between formations.
                                     717

-------
§146.62
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 146.62 Minimum criteria for siting.
  (a) All Class I hazardous waste injec-
tion wells shall be sited such that they
inject into a formation that is beneath
the lowermost  formation  containing
within  one quarter mile  of  the well
bore an underground source of drinking
water.
  (b) The siting of Class  I hazardous
waste injection wells  shall be limited
to areas that are geologically suitable.
The Director shall determine geologic
suitability based upon:
  (1) An analysis of the structural and
stratigraphic       geology.        the
hydrogeology, and the seismicity of the
region;
  (2) An analysis  of the local geology
and hydrogeology of the  well  site, in-
cluding, at a minimum, detailed infor-
mation regarding stratigraphy,  struc-
ture  and   rock  properties,  aquifer
hydrodynamics and mineral resources;
and
  (3) A determination that the geology
of  the  area  can  be  described  con-
fidently and that limits of waste fate
and transport  can be accurately pre-
dicted through the use  of models.
  (c) Class I hazardous waste  injection
wells shall be sited such that:
  (1) The injection zone has sufficient
permeability,  porosity, thickness  and
areal  extent to prevent  migration of
fluids into USDWs.
  (2) The confining zone:
  (i) Is laterally continuous and free of
transecting,  transmissive  faults  or
fractures  over  an area  sufficient  to
prevenet the movement of fluids into a
USDW;  and
  (ii) Contains at least one formation
of sufficient thickness and with litho-
logic and stress characteristics capable
of preventing vertical propagation of
fractures.
  (d) The owner or operator shall dem-
onstrate to the satisfaction of the Di-
rector that:
  (1) The  confining zone is  separated
from the base of the lowermost USDW
by  at least one sequence of permeable
and less permeable strata that will pro-
vide an added  layer of protection for
the USDW in  the event of fluid  move-
ment  in   an  unlocated  borehole  or
transmissive fault; or
  (2) Within the  area  of review,  the
piezometric surface of the fluid in the
injection   zone  is  less  than   the
piezometric surface of the lowermost
USDW, considering density effects, in-
jection pressures and any significant
pumping in the overlying USDW; or
  (3) There is no USDW present.
  (4) The Director may approve a site
which does not meet the  requirements
in paragraphs (d) (1), (2),  or (3) of this
section  if the  owner or  operator  can
demonstrate  to the Director that be-
cause of the geology,  nature of  the
waste,  or other considerations,  aban-
doned  boreholes  or  other  conduits
would  not   cause   endangerment  of
USDWs.

§ 146.63  Area of review.
  For the purposes of Class I hazardous
waste wells, this section shall apply to
the exclusion of §146.6. The area  of re-
view for Class I hazardous waste  injec-
tion wells shall be a  2-mile  radius
around the well bore. The  Director may
specify a larger area of review based on
the calculated  cone  of influence of the
well.

§ 146.64  Corrective action for wells in
    the area of review.
  For the purposes of Class I hazardous
waste wells, this section shall apply to
the exclusion of §§144.55 and 146.07.
  (a) The owner or  operator of a Class
I hazardous waste well shall as part of
the permit application submit a plan to
the  Director  outlining  the  protocol
used to:
  (1) Identify all wells penetrating the
confining zone  or injection zone within
the area of review; and
  (2) Determine whether wells are ade-
quately completed or plugged.
  (b) The owner or  operator of a Class
I hazardous  waste  well  shall  identify
the location of all wells within the area
of review  that penetrate  the  injection
zone or the  confining zone and shall
submit as required in §146.70(a):
  (1) A tabulation  of all wells within
the area of review that penetrate the
injection zone  or the confining zone;
and
  (2) A description of each well or type
of well and any records of its plugging
or completion.
  (c) For wells  that the Director deter-
mines  are improperly plugged,  com-
pleted,  or abandoned, or for which
                                     718

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §146.65
plugging or completion information  is
unavailable,  the applicant  shall also
submit a plan consisting of such steps
or modification as are necessary to pre-
vent  movement  of  fluids into or be-
tween USDWs. Where the plan is ade-
quate, the Director shall incorporate  it
into the permit as a condition. Where
the Director's review of an application
indicates that the permittee's plan  is
inadequate (based at a minimum on the
factors in  paragraph (e)  of this sec-
tion), the Director shall:
  (1)  Require the applicant  to revise
the plan;
  (2) Prescribe a plan for corrective ac-
tion as a condition of the permit; or
  (3) Deny the application.
  (d) Requirements:
  (1) Existing injection wells. Any per-
mit issued for an existing Class I haz-
ardous waste injection well  requiring
corrective  action other than pressure
limitations shall include  a compliance
schedule requiring any corrective ac-
tion accepted or prescribed under para-
graph (c)  of this  section.  Any such
compliance  schedule shall  provide for
compliance  no later than 2 years  fol-
lowing issuance of the permit and shall
require observance of appropriate pres-
sure limitations under paragraph (d)(3)
until  all other corrective action meas-
ures have been implemented.
  (2) New injection wells. No owner or
operator of  a new  Class  I hazardous
waste injection  well may begin  injec-
tion  until  all corrective actions  re-
quired  under this  section have been
taken.
  (3) The Director may require pressure
limitations in lieu of plugging. If pres-
sure  limitations are used in lieu of
plugging, the Director shall require as
a permit condition that injection pres-
sure be so limited that pressure in the
injection zone at the site  of any  im-
properly completed  or abandoned well
within the  area of review would not be
sufficient to drive  fluids into  or  be-
tween USDWs. This pressure limitation
shall  satisfy the corrective  action re-
quirement. Alternatively, such injec-
tion pressure limitation may be made
part of a compliance schedule and may
be required to be maintained until all
other required corrective actions have
been implemented.
  (e) In  determining the adequacy of
corrective  action  proposed  by the ap-
plicant under paragraph (c)  of this sec-
tion and in determining the additional
steps needed to prevent fluid move-
ment into and between USDWs, the fol-
lowing  criteria and factors  shall  be
considered by the Director:
  (1) Nature and  volume  of injected
fluid;
  (2) Nature of native fluids or byprod-
ucts of injection;
  (3) Geology;
  (4) Hydrology;
  (5) History of the injection operation;
  (6) Completion and plugging records;
  (7) Closure procedures in effect at the
time the well was closed;
  (8)   Hydraulic   connections   with
USDWs;
  (9) Reliability of the procedures used
to identify abandoned wells; and
  (10) Any other factors which might
affect the  movement of fluids into or
between USDWs.

§ 146.65  Construction requirements.
  (a)  General.  All  existing and  new
Class I hazardous waste injection wells
shall be constructed and completed to:
  (1) Prevent the  movement  of fluids
into or between USDWs or into any un-
authorized zones;
  (2) Permit  tiie  use  of appropriate
testing devices and workover tools; and
  (3) Permit continuous monitoring of
injection tubing and long string casing
as required pursuant to §146.67(f).
  (b) Compatibility. All  well materials
must  be compatible with fluids  with
which the  materials may be  expected
to come  into contact. A well shall be
deemed to have compatibility as  long
as the  materials used in the construc-
tion of the well meet or exceed stand-
ards developed for such  materials  by
the American Petroleum Institute, The
American  Society for  Testing Mate-
rials, or  comparable standards accept-
able to the Director.
  (c) Casing and Cementing of New Wells.
(1) Casing and cement used  in the con-
struction of each  newly drilled  well
shall be  designed  for the life expect-
ancy of  the  well,  including the post-
closure care period. The  casing and ce-
menting  program  shall  be designed to
prevent the movement of fluids into or
                                    719

-------
§146.65
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
between USDWs, and to prevent poten-
tial leaks of fluids from the well. In de-
termining  and  specifying casing and
cementing requirements,  the Director
shall  consider  the following informa-
tion as required by §146.70:
  (i) Depth to the injection zone;
  (ii) Injection pressure, external pres-
sure, internal pressure and axial load-
ing;
  (iii) Hole size;
  (iv) Size  and grade of all  casing
strings   (well   thickness,  diameter,
nominal weight, length, joint specifica-
tion and construction material);
  (v)  Corrosiveness  of injected fluid,
formation fluids and temperature;
  (vi) Lithology of injection and con-
fining zones;
  (vii) Type or grade of cement; and
  (viii)  Quantity  and  chemical com-
position of the injected fluid.
  (2) One surface casing string shall, at
a minimum, extend  into the confining
bed below the  lowest formation that
contains a USDW and be cemented  by
circulating cement  from  the  base  of
the casing to the surface, using a min-
imum of 120% of the calculated annual
volume.  The   Director  may  require
more  than 120% when the geology  or
other circumstances warrant it.
  (3) At  least one long string  casing,
using   a   sufficient   number   of
centralizers, shall extend to the injec-
tion zone and shall be cemented by cir-
culating  cement to the surface in one
or more stages:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the  maximum operating
pressure; and
  (ii) In a quantity no less  than 120% of
the calculated volume necessary to fill
the annular space. The Director may
require more than 120% when the geol-
ogy or other circumstances warrant it.
  (4) Circulation of cement may be ac-
complished by  staging. The Director
may approve an alternative  method of
cementing in  cases  where the cement
cannot be  recirculated to the surface,
provided  the  owner  or operator can
demonstrate by using logs that the ce-
ment is continuous and does not allow
fluid movement behind the well bore.
  (5) Casings, including any casing con-
nections, must be rated to have suffi-
cient structural strength to withstand,
for the design life of the well:
  (i) The maximum burst and collapse
pressures  which  may be  experienced
during the construction, operation and
closure of the well; and
  (ii)  The  maximum  tensile  stress
which may be experienced at any point
along the length of the casing  during
the  construction, operation,  and  clo-
sure of the well.
  (6) At a minimum, cement and ce-
ment additivies must be of sufficient
quality and  quantity to maintain in-
tegrity over the design life of the  well.
  (d) Tubing and packer. (1)  All  Class I
hazardous  waste injection wells  shall
inject  fluids  through tubing with  a
packer set at a point specified  by the
Director.
  (2) In determining and specifying re-
quirements for tubing and packer, the
following factors shall be considered:
  (i) Depth of setting;
  (ii) Characteristics of injection  fluid
(chemical content, corrosiveness,  tem-
perature and density);
  (iii) Injection pressure;
  (iv) Annular pressure;
  (v)  Rate  (intermittent  or  contin-
uous),  temperature and volume of in-
jected fluid;
  (vi) Size of casing; and
  (vii)  Tubing  tensile, burst, and  col-
lapse strengths.
  (3) The Director may approve the use
of a fluid seal if he determines that the
following conditions are met:
  (i) The  operator  demonstrates  that
the seal will provide a level of  protec-
tion comparable to a packer;
  (ii) The operator demonstrates  that
the  staff  is, and  will  remain,  ade-
quately trained to  operate  and main-
tain the well and to identify and inter-
pret variations in parameters of con-
cern;
  (iii) The permit contains specific lim-
itations on variations in annular pres-
sure and loss of annular fluid;
  (iv) The  design and construction of
the well allows continuous monitoring
of the  annular pressure and mass  bal-
ance of annular fluid; and
  (v) A secondary  system  is used to
monitor the  interface between the an-
nulus fluid and the injection fluid and
the permit contains requirements for
testing the system every three months
and recording the results.
                                     720

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §146.67
§ 146,66  Logging, sampling, and testing
    prior to new well operation.
  (a) During the drilling and construc-
tion of a new Class I  hazardous waste
injection well,  appropriate logs  and
tests  shall be  run to  determine or
verify the depth,  thickness, porosity,
permeability, and rock type of, and the
salinity  of any  entrained fluids in, all
relevant geologic units to assure con-
formance with  performance standards
in  §146.65, and  to  establish  accurate
baseline  data   against  which  future
measurements may be compared. A de-
scriptive report interpreting results of
such logs and tests shall be prepared by
a knowledgeable log analyst  and sub-
mitted to the Director. At a minimum,
such logs and tests shall include:
  (1) Deviation  checks during drilling
on  all holes constructed  by drilling a
pilot hole which are enlarged by ream-
ing or  another method.  Such  checks
shall  be  at sufficiently frequent inter-
vals to determine the location of the
borehole and  to assure  that vertical
avenues  for  fluid  movement  in  the
form of diverging holes are not created
during drilling; and
  (2) Such other logs and tests as may
be needed after taking into account the
availability of similar data  in the area
of the drilling  site,  the  construction
plan,  and the need for  additional infor-
mation that  may arise  from time to
time  as  the  construction of  the well
progresses. At  a  minimum,  the  fol-
lowing logs shall be required in the fol-
lowing situations:
  (i) Upon installation of the surface
casing:
  (A)  Resistivity,  spontaneous  poten-
tial, and caliper logs before the casing
is installed; and
  (B)  A cement  bond and  variable den-
sity log, and a temperature log after
the casing is set and cemented.
  (ii)  Upon installation  of the  long
string casing:
  (A)  Resistivity,  spontaneous  poten-
tial, porosity, caliper,  gamma ray,  and
fracture  finder logs before the casing is
installed; and
  (B) A cement  bond and  variable den-
sity log, and a  temperature log after
;he casing is set and cemented.
  (iii) The Director may allow the use
af an  alternative  to  the  above logs
when an alternative will provide equiv-
alent or better information; and
  (3) A mechanical integrity test con-
sisting of:
  (i) A pressure test with liquid or gas;
  (ii) A radioactive tracer survey;
  (iii) A temperature or noise log;
  (iv)  A casing inspection log, if  re-
quired by the Director; and
  (v) Any other test required by the Di-
rector.
  (b) Whole cores or sidewall  cores of
the confining and  injection zones and
formation fluid samples from the injec-
tion zone shall be taken. The Director
may accept cores from nearby wells if
the owner or operator can demonstrate
that core retrieval is not possible and
that such  cores  are  representative of
conditions at the  well.  The Director
may require the  owner or operator to
core other formations in the borehole.
  (c) The fluid temperature, pH, con-
ductivity, pressure and the static fluid
level of the injection zone must be  re-
corded.
  (d) At a  minimum, the following  in-
formation concerning the injection and
confining zones shall be determined or
calculated for Class I hazardous waste
injection wells:
  (1) Fracture pressure;
  (2) Other physical and chemical char-
acteristics of the  injection  and con-
fining zones; and
  (3) Physical and chemical character-
istics of the formation fluids in the  in-
jection zone.
  (e) Upon completion, but prior to op-
eration,  the owner or operator  shall
conduct the following  tests to verify
hydrogeologic characteristics of the  in-
jection zone:
  (1) A pump test; or
  (2) Injectivity tests.
  (f) The Director shall have the oppor-
tunity to witness  all logging and test-
ing by this subpart. The owner or oper-
ator shall submit a schedule of such ac-
tivities to the Director 30 days prior to
conducting the first test.

§ 146.67  Operating requirements.
  (a)  Except  during  stimulation,  the
owner  or operator shall assure that  in-
jection pressure at the  wellhead does
not exceed a maximum which shall be
calculated  so as  to assure  that  the
pressure in the injection zone during
                                     721

-------
§146.67
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
injection  does not initiate  new frac-
tures or propagate existing- fractures in
the injection zone. The owner or oper-
ator  shall assure  that the injection
pressure does not initiate fractures or
propagate existing fractures in the con-
fining zone, nor cause the movement of
injection  or  formation fluids  into  a
USDW.
  (b)  Injection between the outermost
casing protecting USDWs and the well
bore is prohibited.
  (c) The owner or operator shall main-
tain an annulus  pressure that  exceeds
the operating injection pressure, unless
the Director determines that such a re-
quirement might harm the integrity of
the well. The fluid in the annulus shall
be noncorrosive, or shall contain a cor-
rosion inhibitor.
  (d) The owner or operator shall main-
tain mechanical integrity of the injec-
tion well at all times.
  (e)  Permit  requirements for owners
or operators  of hazardous  waste wells
which inject wastes which have the po-
tential to react with the injection  for-
mation to generate gases shall include:
  (1) Conditions limiting the tempera-
ture,  pH  or  acidity of the injected
waste; and
  (2)  Procedures  necessary  to  assure
that pressure imbalances which might
cause a backflow or blowout  do  not
occur.
  (f) The  owner  or  operator shall in-
stall and use continuous recording de-
vices to  monitor: the  injection pres-
sure:  the  flow  rate, volume, and tem-
perature   of  injected fluids; and  the
pressure on the  annulus between  the
tubing and the long string casing,  and
shall install and use:
  (1) Automatic  alarm  and automatic
shut-off systems,  designed to sound and
shut-in  the well  when pressures  and
flow  rates or other  parameters  ap-
proved by the Director  exceed a range
and/or gradient specified in the permit:
or
  (2)  Automatic  alarms, designed  to
sound when  the pressures  and  flow
rates or other parameters approved by
the Director  exceed a rate and/or gra-
dient specified in the permit, in cases
where the owner or operator certifies
that a trained  operator will  be  on-site
at all times when the well is operating.
  (g)  If an  automatic alarm or shut-
down is triggered,  the owner or oper-
ator shall immediately investigate and
identify  as expeditiously as possible
the cause of the alarm  or  shutoff. If,
upon  such investigation, the well ap-
pears to be lacking mechanical integ-
rity,  or if monitoring required under
paragraph (f) of this section otherwise
indicates that the well may be lacking
mechanical  integrity, the owner or op-
erator shall:
  (1) Cease injection of waste fluids un-
less authorized by the Director to con-
tinue or resume injection.
  (2) Take all necessary steps 1:0 deter-
mine  the presence or absence of a leak;
and
  (3)  Notify the  Director  within  24
hours after the  alarm or shutdown.
  (h) If a loss of mechanical integrity is
discovered pursuant to paragraph (g) of
this section or during periodic mechan-
ical integrity testing, the owner or op-
erator shall:
  (1)  Immediately  cease injection  of
waste fluids;
  (2)  Take  all steps reasonably  nec-
essary to determine whether there may
have been a release of hazardous wastes
or hazardous waste constituents  into
any unauthorized zone;
  (3)  Notify the  Director  within  24
hours after loss  of mechanical integ-
rity is discovered;
  (4) Notify the  Director when injec-
tion can be expected to resume; and
  (5) Restore and demonstrate mechan-
ical integrity to the satisfaction of the
Director prior to resuming injection of
waste fluids.
  (i) Whenever the owner or operator
obtains  evidence that there may have
been a release  of injected wastes into
an unauthorized zone:
  (1) The  owner or operator shall  im-
mediately   case  injection   of  waste
fluids, and:
  (i)  Notify  the  Director  within  24
hours of obtaining such evidence;
  (ii)  Take all necessary steps to iden-
tify and characterize the extent of any
release;
  (iii) Comply  with  any remediation
plan specified by the Director;
  (iv) Implement any remediation plan
approved by the Director; and
  (v)  Where such  release  is into  a
USDW currently  serving as  a water
                                     722

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §146.68
supply, place a notice in a newspaper of
general circulation.
  (2) The Director may allow the oper-
ator to resume injection prior to com-
pleting cleanup  action  if the owner or
operator demonstrates  that the injec-
tion  operation  will  not   endanger
USDWs.
  (j) The owner or operator shall notify
the Director and obtain his approval
prior to conducting any well workover.

§146.68 Testing  and  monitoring  re-
    quirements.
  Testing and monitoring requirements
shall at a minimum include:
  (a) Monitoring of the injected wastes.
(1) The owner or operator shall develop
and follow an approved written waste
analysis plan that describes the proce-
dures to be carried out to obtain a de-
tailed  chemical and  physical analysis
of  a  representative  sample  of  the
waste, including  the quality assurance
procedures used. At  a minimum,  the
plan shall specify:
  (i) The  paramenters  for  which  the
waste will  be analyzed  and  the ration-
ale for the selection of these param-
eters;
  (ii)  The  test  methods that will  be
used to test  for these parameters; and
  (iii)  The  sampling  method that will
be used to obtain a representative sam-
ple of the waste to be  analyzed.
  (2) The  owner  or operator shall re-
peat the analysis of the injected wastes
as described in the waste analysis plan
at frequencies  specified in  the waste
analysis plan and when  process or oper-
ating changes occur that may signifi-
cantly alter  the  characteristics of the
waste stream.
  (3) The owner or operator shall con-
duct continuous or periodic  monitoring
of selected parameters  as required by
the Director.
  (4) The owner  or operator shall as-
sure that  the plan remains accurate
and  the  analyses remain  representa-
tive.
  (b) Hydrogeologic compatibility de-
termination.  The owner or operator
shall   submit    information   dem-
onstrating  to the satisfaction of  the
Director that the waste stream and its
anticipated reaction products will not
alter  the  permeability, thickness  or
other  relevant characteristics  of  the
confining or injection zones such that
they would no longer meet the require-
ments specified in § 146.62.
  (c)  Compatibility  of well materials.
(1) The owner  or operator shall dem-
onstrate that the waste stream will be
compatible  with  the well  materials
with  which the  waste  is  expected to
come into contact,  and  submit to the
Director a description of the method-
ology used  to  make that  determina-
tion. Compatibility for purposes of this
requirement is  established if contact
with injected fluids  will not cause the
well materials to fail to satisfy any de-
sign   requirement   imposed   under
§146.65(b).
  (2) The Director shall require contin-
uous  corrosion monitoring of the con-
struction materials used in the well for
wells injecting  corrosive  waste, and
may require such monitoring for other
waste, by:
  (i) Placing coupons of the well con-
struction materials in contact with the
waste stream; or
  (ii)   Routing   the  waste  stream
through  a loop constructed with the
material used in the well; or
  (iii) Using an alternative method ap-
proved by the Director.
  (3) If a corrosion monitoring program
is required:
  (i) The test shall use materials iden-
tical to those used in the construction
of the well, and such materials must be
continuously exposed to the operating
pressures and temperatures (measured
at the well head) and flow rates of the
injection operation; and
  (ii) The owner or operator shall mon-
itor  the  materials  for  loss  of  mass,
thickness, cracking, pitting and other
signs of corrosion on a quarterly basis
to ensure that the  well  components
meet the minimum standards for mate-
rial strength and performance set forth
in§146.65(b).
  (d)  Periodic mechanical integrity test-
ing.  In  fulfilling the requirements of
§ 146.8, the owner or  operator of a Class
I hazardous waste injection well shall
conduct the mechanical integrity test-
ing as follows:
  (1) The  long- string casing,  injection
tube,  and annular seal shall be tested
by means of an  approved pressure test
with a liquid or gas annually and when-
ever there has been a well workover;
                                    723

-------
§146.69
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (2) The bottom-hole cement shall be
tested by means of an approved radio-
active tracer survey annually;
  (3) An approved temperature, noise,
or other approved log shall be run at
least once every five years to test for
movement of fluid along the borehole.
The  Director may require such tests
whenever the well is worked over;
  (4) Casing inspection logs shall be run
whenever the owner  or operator con-
ducts a  workover in which the injec-
tion string is pulled,  unless the Direc-
tor waives this requirement due to well
construction or other  factors  which
limit the  test's reliability,  or based
upon the satisfactory results of a cas-
ing inspection  log run within the pre-
vious five years. The Director may re-
quire that a casing inspection log be
run every five years, if he has reason to
believe that the integrity of the long
string casing of the  well may be ad-
versely affected by naturally-occurring
or man-made events;
  (5) Any other  test approved by the
Director in accordance with the proce-
dures in §146.8(d) may also be used.
  (e) Ambient monitoring. (1) Based on a
site-specific assessment of the poten-
tial  for fluid movement from  the well
or injection zone, and on the potential
value  of monitoring wells  to  detect
such movement,  the Director shall re-
quire the owner or operator to develop
a monitoring program. At a minimum,
the Director shall require  monitoring
of the pressure buildup in the injection
zone  annually, including  at a  min-
imum, a shut  down of the well for a
time sufficient to conduct  a valid ob-
servation of the pressure fall-off curve.
  (2)  When  prescribing  a  monitoring
system the Director may also require:
  (i) Continuous monitoring for  pres-
sure changes in the first aquifer over-
lying the confining zone. When such a
well is installed, the owner  or operator
shall, on a quarterly  basis,  sample the
aquifer and  analyze  for constituents
specified by the Director;
  (ii) The use  of indirect, geophysical
techniques to determine  the position of
the waste front, the water quality in a
formation designated by the Director,
or to provide other site specific data;
  (iii)   Periodic  monitoring  of  the
ground water quality in the first aqui-
fer overlying the injection zone:
  (iv)  Periodic  monitoring  of  the
ground water quality in the lowermost
USDW; and
  (v)  Any  additional monitoring nec-
essary to determine whether fluids are
moving into or between USDWs.
  (f)  The Director  may require seis-
micity monitoring  when he has reason
to believe  that the injection  activity
may have the capacity to cause seismic
disturbances.
[53 PR 28148, July 26,  1988, as amended at 57
FR 46294, Oct 7, 1992]

§ 146.69  Reporting requirements.
  Reporting  requirements shall,  at a
minimum, include:
  (a) Quarterly reports  to the Director
containing:
  (1) The maximum injection pressure;
  (2) A  description  of any  event that
exceeds operating parameters for annu-
lus  pressure or  injection pressure as
specified in the permit;
  (3) A description  of any event  which
triggers  an alarm  or shutdown device
required pursuant to §146.67(f) and the
response taken:
  (4) The total volume of fluid injected;
  (5) Any change in the annular fluid
volume;
  (6) The physical,  chemical and other
relevant  characteristics  of   injected
fluids; and
  (7)  The results  of monitoring pre-
scribed under §146.68.
  (b) Reporting, within  30 days or with
the  next quarterly report whichever
comes later, the results of:
  (1) Periodic tests of  mechanical  in-
tegrity;
  (2) Any other  test of the  injection
well conducted by  the permittee if re-
quired by the Director; and
  (3) Any well workover.

§ 146.70   Information to be  evaluated
   by the Director.
  This section  sets  forth the informa-
tion which  must be evaluated by the
Director in  authorizing  Class I haz-
ardous waste injection wells. For a new
Class I hazardous waste injection well,
the owner or operator shall submit all
the information listed below as part of
the permit application.  For an existing
or converted Class  I hazardous  waste
injection well,  the  owner or operator
shall submit  all  information  listec
                                     724

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §146.70
below as part of the permit application
except for those items of information
which are current, accurate, and avail-
able in the  existing permit file.  For
both  existing  and new  Class  I haz-
ardous  waste injection  wells, certain
maps,   cross-sections,  tabulations  of
wells within the area of  review  and
other data may be included in the ap-
plication  by reference provided they
are current and readily available to the
Director (for example, in the permit-
ting agency's  files)  and  sufficiently
identifiable to be  retrieved. In cases
where EPA issues  the permit, all the
information  in  this  section must  be
submitted  to the Administrator  or his
designee.
  (a) Prior to the issuance  of a permit
for an existing Class I hazardous waste
injection  well to operate or the con-
struction or conversion of a new Class
I hazardous  waste injection  well, the
Director shall review the following to
assure that the  requirements of this
part and part 144 are met:
  (1) Information required in § 144.31;
  (2) A map showing the injection well
for which  a permit is sought and the
applicable  area  of review.  Within the
area of  review,  the map must show the
number or name and location  of all
producing  wells,  injection wells, aban-
doned wells,  dry holes, surface bodies
of water, springs,  mines (surface  and
subsurface), quarries,  water wells  and
other pertinent  surface  features, in-
cluding residences and roads. The map
should  also show faults, if known or
suspected;
  (3) A  tabulation  of all wells within
the area of review which  penetrate the
proposed  injection zone  or confining
zone. Such data shall  include a descrip-
tion of  each  well's type,  construction,
date drilled,  location, depth, record of
plugging and/or completion  and any ad-
ditional information the  Director may
require;
  (4) The protocol followed  to identify,
locate  and ascertain the condition of
abandoned wells within the area of re-
view which penetrate the injection or
the confining zones;
  (5)  Maps  and  cross-sections  indi-
cating the general vertical  and lateral
limits  of all underground  sources of
drinking water within the  area  of re-
view, their position relative to the in-
jection formation and the direction of
water movement, where known, in each
underground source of drinking  water
which may be affected by the proposed
injection;
  (6) Maps and cross-sections detailing
the geologic structure of the local area;
  (7)  Maps and  cross-sections  illus-
trating the regional geologic setting;
  (8) Proposed operating data;
  (i) Average and maximum daily rate
and volume of the fluid to be injected;
and
  (ii) Average and maximum  injection
pressure;
  (9) Proposed formation testing pro-
gram to  obtain  an analysis of  the
chemical,  physical  and  radiological
characteristics of and  other  informa-
tion on the injection formation and the
confining zone;
  (10) Proposed stimulation program;
  (11) Proposed injection procedure;
  (12) Schematic or other appropriate
drawings  of the surface and subsurface
construction details of the well;
  (13) Contingency plans to cope with
all  shut-ins or  well  failures  so  as to
prevent migration of fluids  into  any
USDW;
  (14) Plans (including maps)  for meet-
ing monitoring requirements of §146.68;
  (15) For wells within the  area  of re-
view  which  penetrate  the  injection
zone or the confining zone but are not
properly completed or plugged, the cor-
rective  action   to  be  taken   under
§146.64;
  (16) Construction procedures includ-
ing- a cementing and casing  program,
well materials specifications and their
life expectancy, logging procedures, de-
viation  checks,  and a drilling, testing
and coring program; and
  (17) A  demonstration  pursuant  to
part 144, subpart F, that the  applicant
has the resources  necessary  to  close,
plug or  abandon the well and for post-
closure care.
  (b) Prior to the  Director's granting
approval for the  operation of a Class I
hazardous waste  injection  well,  the
owner or operator shall submit and the
Director shall review the following in-
formation, which shall be included in
the completion report:
  (1) All available logging and testing
program data on the well;
                                     725

-------
§146.71
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (2) A demonstration of mechanical
integrity pursuant to §146.68;
  (3) The  anticipated maximum pres-
sure and  flow  rate  at  which the per-
mittee will operate;
  (4) The  results of  the injection zone
and confining: zone testing program as
required in §146.70(a)(9);
  (5) The actual injection procedure;
  (6)  The  compatibility  of injected
waste with fluids in the injection zone
and minerals in both the injection zone
and  the confining- zone and  with the
materials used  to construct the well;
  (7) The  calculated  area  of  review
based on data  obtained during logging
and testing of  the well and the forma-
tion, and  where necessary revisions to
the  information   submitted   under
§146.70(a) (2) and (3).
  (8) The status of corrective action on
wells identified in §146.70(a)(15).
  (c) Prior to granting approval for the
plugging  and  abandonment  (i.e., clo-
sure) of a Class I hazardous waste in-
jection  well,  the Director shall review
the     information     required    in
§§146.71(a)(4) and 146.72(a).
  (d) Any permit issued for a Class I
hazardous waste injection well for dis-
posal on the  premises where the waste
is generated shall  contain  a certifi-
cation by the owner or operator that:
  (1) The  generator of the  hazardous
waste has a program to reduce the vol-
ume or quantity and toxicity of such
waste to the  degree  determined by the
generator  to  be  economically  prac-
ticable; and
  (2) Injection of the  waste  is  that
practicable  method  of disposal  cur-
rently available to the generator which
minimizes the  present  and  future
threat to  human health and the envi-
ronment.

§ 146.71  Closure.
  (a) Closure  Plan. The owner or oper-
ator of a Class  I hazardous waste injec-
tion well  shall prepare, maintain, and
comply with a plan for closure of the
well that meets the requirements of
paragraph (d) of this section and is ac-
ceptable to the Director. The  obliga-
tion to implement the closure plan sur-
vives  the  termination  of a  permit or
the cessation  of  injection  activities.
The  requirement  to  maintain  and
implement an approved plan is directly
enforceable regardless of whether the
requirement is a condition  of the per-
mit.
  (1) The owner or operator shall sub-
mit the plan  as  a part  of  the  permit
application and,  upon approval  by the
Director, such plan shall be  a condition
of any permit issued.
  (2) The owner or operator shall sub-
mit any proposed significant revision
to the method of closure reflected in
the plan for approval by the Director
no later than the date on which notice
of closure  is required to be submitted
to the Director under paragraph (b) of
this section.
  (3) The plan  shall assure financial re-
sponsibility as required in §144.52(a)(7).
  (4) The plan shall include bhe fol-
lowing information:
  (i) The type and number  of plugs to
be used;
  (ii)  The placement of each plug in-
cluding the elevation of the top and
bottom of each plug;
  (ill) The type and grade and quantity
of material to  be  used in  plugging;
  (iv) The method of placement of the
plugs;
  (v) Any proposed test  or  measure to
be made;
  (vi) The  amount,  size, and location
(by depth) of casing and  any other ma-
terials to be left in the well;
  (vii) The  method and location where
casing is to be parted, if applicable;
  (viii) The procedure  to  be used  to
meet  the  requirements of  paragraph
(d)(5) of this section;
  (ix) The  estimated cost  of closure;
and
  (x) Any proposed test  or  measure to
be made.
  (5) The Director may  modify a clo-
sure plan following the procedures of
§124.5.
  (6) An owner or operator of a  Class I
hazardous  waste  injection  well  who
ceases injection temporarily, may keep
the well open provided he:
  (i) Has received  authorization  from
the Director; and
  (ii)  Has described actions or proce-
dures,  satisfactory  to  the Director,
that the owner or operator will take to
ensure that the well will not endanger
USDWs during the period of temporary
disuse. These  actions and  procedures
                                     726

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §146.72
shall include compliance with the tech-
nical requirements applicable to active
injection wells unless waived by the Di-
rector.
  (7)  The owner or operator of  a well
that  has ceased  operations for more
than two years shall notify the  Direc-
tor 30 days prior to resuming operation
of the well.
  (b)  Notice of intent to close. The owner
or operator shall notify the Director at
least 60  days before closure of a well.
At the  discretion of the  Director, a
shorter notice period may be allowed.
  (c) Closure report. Within 60 days after
closure or at the time of the next quar-
terly report  (whichever  is less)  the
owner or operator shall submit  a clo-
sure report to the Director. If the quar-
terly report  is due less  than 15 days
after completion of closure,  then  the
report shall  be submitted within 60
days  after closure. The report shall be
certified as accurate by  the owner or
operator and by  the person who per-
formed the closure operation (if other
than  the owner or operator). Such re-
port shall consist of either:
  (1)  A  statement that the well was
closed in accordance with the closure
plan  previously  submitted  and  ap-
proved by the Director; or
  (2) Where actual closure differed from
the plan previously submitted, a writ-
ten   statement  specifying  the  dif-
ferences  between the previous plan and
the actual closure.
  (d) Standards for well closure. (1) Prior
to closing the well, the owner  or oper-
ator shall observe and record the pres-
sure decay for a time specified by the
Director. The  Director  shall  analyze
the pressure decay and the transient
pressure  observations conducted  pursu-
ant  to  §146.68(e)(l)(i) and  determine
whether  the injection activity has con-
formed with predicted values.
  (2) Prior to well closure,  appropriate
mechanical  integrity  testing shall be
conducted  to ensure the  integrity of
that portion  of the long  string-  casing
and  cement  that will  be  left  in the
ground after closure. Testing methods
may include:
  (i) Pressure tests with liquid or gas;
  (ii) Radioactive tracer surveys;
  (ill) Noise,  temperature,  pipe evalua-
tion, or cement bond logs; and
  (iv) Any other test required by the
Director.
  (3)  Prior  to well closure,  the well
shall be flushed with a buffer fluid.
  (4) Upon closure, a Class I hazardous
waste  well  shall be  plugged with ce-
ment in a manner that will not allow
the movement of fluids into or between
USDWs.
  (5)  Placement  of the cement plugs
shall be accomplished by one of the fol-
lowing:
  (i) The Balance Method;
  (ii) The Dump Bailer Method;
  (iii) The Two-Plug Method; or
  (iv) An alternate method,  approved
by the Director, that will reliably pro-
vide a comparable level of protection.
  (6)  Each plug  used shall  be appro-
priately tagged and tested for seal and
stability before closure is completed.
  (7) The well to be closed shall be in a
state of  static equilibrium  with the
mud weight  equalized  top  to bottom.
either by circulating  the  mud in the
well at least once  or by a comparable
method  prescribed by  the  Director,
prior to  the  placement of the  cement
plug(s).

§ 146.72  Post-closure care.
  (a) The owner or operator of a Class
I hazardous waste well shall  prepare,
maintain, and comply  with a plan for
post-closure  care that  meets  the re-
quirements of paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion and is acceptable to the Director.
The  obligation to implement the post-
closure plan survives  the  termination
of a permit or the cessation of injec-
tion  activities.  The  requirement  to
maintain an approved plan is directly
enforceable  regardless  of whether the
requirement is a condition of the per-
mit.
  (1) The  owner or operator shall sub-
mit the plan as a part of the permit ap-
plication and, upon approval by the Di-
rector, such plan shall be a condition of
any permit issued.
  (2) The  owner or operator shall sub-
mit  any proposed  significant  revision
to the plan as appropriate over  the life
of the well, but no later than the date
of the closure report  required under
§146.71(c).
  (3) The plan shall assure financial re-
sponsibility as required in §146.73.
                                     727
      203-160  D-24

-------
§146.73
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (4) The plan shall include the fol-
lowing' information:
  (i) The pressure in the injection zone
before injection began;
  (ii) The anticipated pressure  in the
injection zone at the time of closure;
  (iii) The predicted time until pres-
sure in the injection zone decays to the
point that the well's cone of influence
no  longer  intersects the base  of the
lowermost USDW;
  (iv) Predicted position of the waste
front at closure;
  (v) The status of any cleanups re-
quired under § 146.64; and
  (vi) The  estimated cost of proposed
post-closure care.
  (5) At the request of the owner or op-
erator, or on his own initiative, the Di-
rector  may  modify  the post-closure
plan after submission of the closure re-
port following' the procedures in §124.5.
  (b) The owner or operator shall:
  (1) Continue and complete any clean-
up action required under §146.64, if ap-
plicable;
  (2) Continue to conduct any ground-
water monitoring required under the
permit until pressure in the injection
zone decays to the point that the well's
cone of influence no longer intersects
the base of the lowermost USDW. The
Director may extend the period of post-
closure  monitoring  if  he determines
that the well may endanger a USDW.
  (3) Submit a survey plat to the local
zoning authority designated by the Di-
rector. The plat shall indicate the loca-
tion of the  well  relative  to  perma-
nently surveyed benchmarks. A copy of
the plat shall be submitted to the Re-
gional  Administrator  of the  appro-
priate EPA Regional Office.
  (4) Provide  appropriate  notification
and  information  to such  State and
local authorities  as have  cognizance
over drilling activities  to enable such
State and local authorities to impose
appropriate conditions  on subsequent
drilling activities  that  may penetrate
the well's confining or injection zone.
  (5) Retain, for a period of three years
following well closure,  records reflect-
ing the nature, composition and vol-
ume of all injected fluids. The Director
shall require the owner or operator to
deliver the records to the Director  at
the conclusion of the retention period,
and  the records shall thereafter be re-
tained at a location designated  by the
Director for that purpose.
  (c) Each owner of a Class I hazardous
waste injection well, and the owner of
the surface or subsurface property on
or in which a Class I hazardous waste
injection well is located, must record a
notation on  the  deed to the facility
property or on some other instrument
which  is normally examined  during
title search that will in perpetuity pro-
vide any potential purchaser  of  the
property the following information:
  (1) The fact that land  has been  used
to manage hazardous waste;
  (2) The name of the  State agency or
local authority with  which the  plat
was filed, as well as the  address of the
Regional  Environmental   Protection
Agency  Office to  which it was  sub-
mitted;
  (3) The type and volume of waste in-
jected, the injection interval or inter-
vals into which it was injected, and the
period over which injection occurred.

§146.73   Financial   responsibility   for
    post-closure care.
  The  owner  or  operator shall dem-
onstrate and maintain  financial re-
sponsibility for post-closure by using a
trust fund, surety bond,  letter of cred-
it,  financial   test,   insurance or  cor-
porate guarantee that meets the speci-
fications for the mechanisms and in-
struments  revised   as appropriate  to
cover closure and post-closure care in
40 CFR part 144, subpart F. The amount
of the funds  available shall be no  less
than   the   amount   identified   in
§146.72(a)(4)(vi).   The   obligation   to
maintain financial responsibility for
post-closure  care  survives  the  termi-
nation of a permit or  the cessation of
injection. The requirement to maintain
financial responsibility  is enforceable
regardless of whether the requirement
is a condition of the permit.

  PART 147—STATE UNDERGROUND
 INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAMS

      Subpart A—General Provisions

Sec.
14V.1 Purpose and scope.
147.2 Severability of provisions.
                                     728

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                   Pt.  147
           Subpart B—Alabama

147.50  State-administered program—Class II
    wells
147.51  State-administered program—Class I,
    III. IV, and V wells.
147.52  State-administered    program—Hy-
    draulic Fracturing of Coal Beds.
147.60  EPA-administered   program—Indian
    lands.

            Subpart C—Alaska

147.100  State-administered  program—Class
    II wells.
147.101  EPA-administered program.
147.102  Aquifer exemptions.
147.103  Existing Class I, II (except enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage)  and
    III wells authorized by rule.
147.104  Existing Class II  enhanced recovery
    and hydrocarbon storage wells author-
    ized by rule

            Subpart D—Arizona

147.150  State-administered  program.   [Re-
    served]
147.151  EPA-administered program
147.152  Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]

           Subpart E—Arkansas

147 200  State-administered  program—Class
    I, III, IV, and V wells.
147.201  State-administered  program—Class
    II wells. [Reserved]
147.205  EPA-administered  program—Indian
    lands.

           Subpart F—California

147.250  State-administered  program—Class
    II wells.
147 251  EPA-administered program—Class I,
    III, IV, and V wells and Indian lands.
147 252  Aquifer exemptions, [Reserved]
147.253  Existing Class I, II (except enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage)  and
    III wells authorized by rule

           Subpart G—Colorado

147.300  State-administered  program—Class
    II wells
147.301  EPA-administered program—Class I,
    III, IV, V wells and Indian lands.
147.302  Aquifer exemptions.
147 303  Existing Class I, II (except enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage)  and
    III wells authorized by rule.
147.304  Existing Class II  enhanced recovery
    and hydrocarbon  storage wells  author-
    ized by rule
147.305  Requirements for  all wells.

         Subpart H—Connecticut

147 350  State-administered program.
147.351-147.352  [Reserved]
147.353  EPA-administered  program—Indian
    lands.
147.354-147.359  [Reserved]

           Subpart I—Delaware

147.400  State-administered program.
147.401-147.402  [Reserved]
147.403  EPA-administered  program—Indian
    lands.
147 404-147.449  [Reserved]

      Subpart J—District of Columbia

147.450  State-administered  program.  [Re-
    served]
147.451  EPA-administered program.
147.452  Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]

            Subpart K—Florida

147.500  State-administered  program—Class
    I, III, IV, and V wells.
147.501  EPA-administered program—Class II
    wells and Indian lands.
147.502  Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.503  Existing  Class II  (except enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage) wells
    authorized by rule.
147.504  Existing Class II  enhanced recovery
    and hydrocarbon  storage wells  author-
    ized by rule

            Subpart L—Georgia

147.550  State-administered program.
147.551-147.552  [Reserved]
147.553  EPA-administered  program—Indian
    lands.
147.554-147.559  [Reserved]

            Subpart M—Hawaii

147.600  State-administered  program.  [Re-
    served]
147.601  EPA-administered program.

            Subpart N—Idaho

147 650  State-administrative     program—
    Class I, II, III. IV, and V wells.
147.651  EPA-administered  program—Indian
    lands.
147.652  Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]

            Subpart O—Illinois

147.700  State-administered  program—Class
    I, III, IV. and V wells
147.701  State-administered  program—Class
    II wells.
147.703  EPA-administered  program—Indian
    lands.

            Subpart P—Indiana

147 750  State-administered  program—Class
    II wells.
                                          729

-------
Pt. 147
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
147.751 EPA-administered program.
147.752 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.753 Existing Class I and III wells author-
   ized by rule.

            Subpart Q—Iowa

147.800 State-administered  program.   [Re-
   served]
147.801 EPA-administered program.
147.802 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]

            Subpart R—Kansas

147.850 State-administered  program—Class
   I, III, IV and V wells.
147.851 State-administered  program—Class
   II wells.
147.852-147.859  [Reserved]
147.860 EPA-administered  program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart S—Kentucky

147.900 State-administered  program.   [Re-
   served]
147.901 EPA-administered program.
147.902 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.903 Existing: Class I,  II (except enhanced
   recovery and hydrocarbon storage) and
   III wells authorized by rule.
147.904 Existing Class II enhanced recovery
   and hydrocarbon  storage  wells  author-
   ized by rule.
147.905 Requirements for all  wells—area  of
   review.

           Subpart T—Louisiana

147.950 State-administered program.
147.951 EPA-administered  program—Indian
   lands.

            Subpart U—Maine

147.1000  State-administered program.
147.1001  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart V—Man/land

147.1050  State-administered program—Class
   I, II, III, IV, and V wells.
147.1051-147.1052  [Reserved]
147.1053  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.
147.1054-147.1099  [Reserved]

        Subpart W—Massachusetts

147.1100  State-administered program.
147.1101  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart X—Michigan

147.1150  State-administered  program.  [Re-
   served]
147.1151  EPA-administered program.
147 1152 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.1153 Existing  Class  I,  II (except  en-
   hanced recovery and hydrocarbon stor-
   age) and III wells authorized by rule.
147.1154 Existing Class II enhanced recovery
   and hydrocarbon  storage  wells  author-
   ized by rule.
147.1155 Requirements for all wells.

          Subpart Y—Minnesota

147.1200 State-administered  program.  [Re-
   served]
147.1201 EFA-administered program.
147.1202 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.1210 Requirements for Indian lands.

          Subpart Z—Mississippi

147.1250 State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV, and V wells.
147.1251 State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.1252 EPA-administered program-—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart AA—Missouri

147.1300 State-administered program.
147.1301 State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV, and V wells.
147.1302 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.1303 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart BB—Montana

147.1350 State-administered     programs—
   Class II wells
147.1351 EPA-administered program.
147.1352 Aquifer exemptions.
147.1353 Existing  Class  I,  II (except  en-
   hanced recovery and hydrocarbon stor-
   age) and III wells authorized by rule.
147.1354 Existing Class II enhanced recovery
   and hydrocarbon  storage  wells  author-
   ized by rule.
147.1355 Requirements for all wells.
APPENDIX A TO  SUBPART BB  OF PART 147—
   STATE REQUIREMENTS  INCORPORATED  BY
   REFERENCE IN  SUBPART  BB OF PART 147
   OF  THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS.

          Subpart CC—Nebraska

147.1400 State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.1401 State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV, and V wells.
147.1402 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.1403 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart DO—Nevada

147.1450 State-administered program.
147.1451 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.
                                         730

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                  Pt. 147
147.1452 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.1453 Existing  Class  I,  II (except  en-
   hanced recovery and hydrocarbon stor-
   age) and III wells authorized by rule.
147.1454 Existing Class II enhanced recovery
   and hydrocarbon  storage  wells  author-
   ized by rule.

       Subpart EE—New Hampshire

147.1500 State-administered program
147.1501 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

         Subpart FF—New Jersey

147.1550 State-administered program.
147.1551 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

        Subpart GG—New Mexico

147.1600 State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.1601 State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV and V wells.
147 1603 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart HH—New York

147.1650 State-administered program.  [Re-
   served]
147.1651 EPA-administered program
147.1652 Aquifer exemptions.
147.1653 Existing  Class  I,  II (except  en-
   hanced recovery and hydrocarbon stor-
   age) and III wells authorized by rule
147.1654 Existing Class II enhanced recovery
   and hydrocarbon  storage  wells  author-
   ized by rule.
147.1655 Requirements for  wells  authorized
   by permit.

        Subpart II—North Carolina

147.1700 State-administered program
147.1701-147.1702  [Reserved]
147.1703 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands
147.1704-147.1749  [Reserved]

        Subpart JJ—North Dakota

147.1750 State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.1751 State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV and V wells.
147.1752 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

            Subpart KK—Ohio

147.1800 State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.1801 State-administered program—Class
   I, III. IV and V wells.
147 1802 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
147.1803  Existing Class I and III  wells au-
   thorized  by  rule—maximum  injection
   pressure.
147.1805  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart LL—Oklahoma

147 1850  State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV and V wells.
147.1851  State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.1852  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart MM—Oregon

147 1900  State-administered program.
147.1901  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.
        Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
                                      [Re-
147.1950  State-administered  program.
   served]
147.1951  EPA-administered program.
147.1952  Aquifer exemptions.
147.1953  Existing  Class  I,  II (except  en-
   hanced recovery and hydrocarbon stor-
   age) and III wells authorized by rule.
147.1954  Existing Class II enhanced recovery
   and  hydrocarbon  storage  wells  author-
   ized by rule.
147.1955  Requirements for  wells  authorized
   by permit.

        Subpart OO—Rhode Island

147.2000  State-administered program—Class
   I, II, III, IV, and V wells.
147.2001  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

        Subpart PP—South  Carolina

147.2050  State-administered program.
147.2051  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

        Subpart QQ—South Dakota

147.2100  State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.2101  EPA-administered  program—Class
   I, III, IV and V wells and all wells on In-
   dian lands.
147.2102  Aquifer exemptions.
147.2103  Existing Class II enhanced recovery
   and  hydrocarbon  storage  wells  author-
   ized by rule.
147 2104  Requirements for all wells.

          Subpart RR—Tennessee

147.2150  State-administered  program.  [Re-
   served]
147.2151  EPA-administered program
147.2152  Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]
                                         731

-------
Pt. 147
           40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
147.2153 Existing  Class  I,  II  (except en-
   hanced recovery and hydrocarbon stor-
   age) and III wells authorized by rule.
147.2154 Existing Class II enhanced recovery
   and hydrocarbon  storage wells author-
   ized by rule.
147.2155 Requirements for all wells—area of
   review.

            Subpart SS—Texas

147.2200 State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV, and V wells.
147.2201 State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147 2205 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

             Subpart TT—Utah

147.2250 State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV, and V wells.
147.2251 State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.2253 EPA-adminietered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart UU—Vermont

147.2300 State-administered program.
147.2301-147.2302  [Reserved]
147.2303 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.
147.2304-147.2349  [Reserved]

          Subpart W—Virginia

147.2350 State-administered program.  [Re-
   served]
147.2351 EPA-administered program.
147.2352 Aquifer exemptions. [Reserved]

        Subpart WW—Washington

147 2400 State-administered program—Class
   I, II, III, IV, and V wells.
147.2403 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.
147.2404 EPA-administered       program—
   Colville  Reservation.

        Subpart XX—West Virginia

147.2450-147.2452  [Reserved]
147.2453 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.
147.2454-147.2499  [Reserved]

          Subpart YY—Wisconsin

147.2500  State-administered program.
147.2510 EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

          Subpart ZZ—Wyoming

147.2550  State-administered program—Class
   I, III, IV, and V wells.
147.2551  State-administered program—Class
   II wells.
147.2553  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.
147.2554  Aquifer exemptions.
147.2555  Aquifer exemptions  since January
   1, 1999.

          Subpart AAA—Guam

147.2600  State-administered program.
147.2601  EPA-administered program-—Indian
   lands,

        Subpart BBS—Puerto Rico

147.2650  State-administered program—Class
   I, II, III, IV, and V wells.
147.2651  EPA-administered program—Indian
   lands.

       Subpart CCC—Virgin Islands

147.2700  State-administered  program.   [Re-
   served]
147.2701  EPA-administered program.

      Subpart DDD—American Samoa

147.2750  State  administered  program.  [Re-
   served]
147.2751  EPA-administered program.
147.2752  Aquifer exemptions.  [Reserved]

   Subpart EEE—Commonwealth of the
        Northern Mariana Islands

147.2800  State-administered  program—Class
   I, II, III, IV, and V wells.
147.2801  EPA-administered program.
147.2802  Aquifer exemptions.  [Reserved]

 Subpart FFF—Trust Territory of the Pacific
                  Islands

147 2850  State-administered  program.  [Re-
   served]
147.2851  EPA-administered program.
147.2852  Aquifer exemptions.  [Reserved]

 Subpart GGG—Osage Mineral Reserve-
               Class II Wells

147.2901  Applicability and scope.
147.2902  Definitions.
147.2903  Prohibition  of unauthorized injec-
   tion.
147.2904  Area of review.
147.2905  Plugging  and abandonment.
147.2906  Emergency permits.
147.2907  Confidentiality of information.
147.2908  Aquifer exemptions.
147.2909  Authorization of existing wells by
   rule.
147.2910  Duration of authorization by rule.
147.2911  Construction requirements for wells
   authorized by rule.
                                         732

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                 §147.1
147.2912  Operating requirements for wells
   authorized by rule.
147.2913  Monitoring and reporting  require-
   ments for wells authorized by rule.
147.2914  Corrective action  for wells author-
   ized by rule.
147.2915  Requiring a permit for wells  au-
   thorized by rule.
147.2916  Coverage  of permitting  require-
   ments.
147.2917  Duration of permits.
147.2918  Permit application information.
147.2919  Construction requirements for wells
   authorized by permit.
147.2920  Operating requirements for wells
   authorized by permit.
147.2921  Schedule of compliance.
147.2922  Monitoring and reporting  require-
   ments for wells authorized by permit.
147.2923  Corrective action  for wells author-
   ized by permit.
147.2924  Area permits.
147.2925  Standard permit conditions.
147.2926  Permit transfers.
147.2927  Permit modification
147.2928  Permit termination.
147.2929  Administrative  permitting proce-
   dures.

Subpart  HHH—Lands of  the Navajo,  Ute
    Mountain Ute, and All  Other New Mex-
    ico Tribes

147.3000  EPA-administered program.
147.3001  Definition.
147.3002  Public notice of permit actions.
147.3003  Aquifer exemptions.
147.3004  Duration of rule authorization for
   existing Class I and III wells.
147.3005  Radioactive waste injection wells.
147.3006  Injection pressure  for existing Class
   II wells authorized by rule.
147.3007  Application for a permit.
147.3008  Criteria for aquifer exemptions.
147.3009  Area of review.
147.3010  Mechanical integrity tests.
147.3011  Plugging and abandonment of Class
   III wells.
147.3012  Construction  requirements   for
   Class I wells.
147.3013  Information to be  considered  for
   Class I wells.
147.3014  Construction  requirements   for
   Class III wells.
147.3015  Information to be  considered  for
   Class III wells.
147.3016  Criteria and standards applicable to
   Class V wells.
APPENDIX A TO SUBPART HHH OF PART 147—
   EXEMPTED AQUIFERS IN NEW MEXICO.

  Subpart III—Lands of Certain Oklahoma
              Indian Tribes

147.3100  EPA-administered program.
147.3101  Public notice of permit actions.
147 3102  Plugging and abandonment  plans.
147.3103  Fluid seals.
147.3104  Notice of abandonment.
147.3105  Plugging and abandonment report
147.3106  Area of review.
147.3107  Mechanical integrity
147.3108  Plugging Class I, II, and III wells.
147.3109  Timing  of  mechanical   integrity
   test.
  AUTHORITY: 42  U.S.C. 300h; and  42 U.S.C.
6901 et seg.
  SOURCE: 49 PR 20197. May 11, 1984, unless
otherwise noted.
  EDITORIAL NOTE: Nomenclature changes to
part 147 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

  Subpart A—General Provisions

§ 147.1  Purpose and scope.
  (a) This part sets forth the applicable
Underground  Injection  Control (UIC)
programs for each  of the states, terri-
tories,  and possessions  identified pur-
suant to the  Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA) as needing  a UIC program.
  (b) The applicable UIC program for a
State  is either  a  State-administered
program approved by EPA,  or a feder-
ally-administered  program   promul-
gated by EPA. In some cases,  the UIC
program may consist of a State-admin-
istered  program applicable  to some
classes of wells and a federally-admin-
istered  program applicable to  other
classes  of wells. Approval  of  a State
program is based upon a determination
by the Administrator that the program
meets the requirements of section  1422
or  section  1425 of the  Safe Drinking
Water Act and  the applicable  provi-
sions of parts  124,  144,  and 146 of this
chapter. A  federally-administered pro-
gram is  promulgated in  those instances
where the state has failed to  submit a
program for approval or where the sub-
mitted program does not meet the min-
imum  statutory  and   regulatory   re-
quirements.
  (c) In  the case  of State programs ap-
proved by EPA pursuant to section 1422
of the SDWA,  each State  subpart de-
scribes the major elements of such pro-
grams,   including State statutes  and
regulations,  Statement  of  Legal  Au-
thority,  Memorandum  of  Agreement,
and Program  Description.  State stat-
utes  and  regulations   that   contain
standards,  requirements,  and  proce-
dures applicable to owners or operatoi-s
have  been  incorporated by reference
                                       733

-------
§147.2
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
pursuant to regulations of the Office of
the Federal  Register. Material incor-
porated by reference is available for in-
spection in the appropriate EPA  Re-
gional  Office,  in  EPA  Headquarters,
and  at  the  National  Archives   and
Records Administration  (NARA).  For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go      to:     http://www.archives.gov/
federal	register/
code	of_federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.  Other State statutes
and  regulations containing  standards
and  procedures that constitute   ele-
ments of the State program but do not
apply directly  to  owners or operators
have been listed but have not been in-
corporated by reference.
  (d) In the case of State programs pro-
mulgated under section 1422 that are to
be administered by EPA, the State sub-
part makes applicable the provisions of
parts 124, 144, and  146, and provides ad-
ditional requirements pertinent to the
specific State program.
  (e)   Regulatory  provisions  incor-
porated by reference (in the case of ap-
proved State programs) or promulgated
by EPA (in the case of EPA-adminis-
tered programs), and all permit condi-
tions or permit denials issued pursuant
to such regulations, are enforceable by
the Administrator pursuant to section
1423 of the SDWA.
  (f) The information requirements lo-
cated  in the following  sections have
been cleared by the Office of Manage-
ment  and  Budget:   Sections  147.104,
147.304,  147.754, 147.904, 147.1154,  147.1354,
147.1454, 147.1654, 147.1954, and 147.2154.
  The  OMB  clearance  number is  No.
2040-0042.

§ 147.2  Severability of provisions.
  The  provisions in  this  part  and  the
various applications  thereof are  dis-
tinct and severable. If any provision of
this  part or the application thereof to
any person or circumstances is held in-
valid,  such  invalidity shall not affect
other provisions or application of such
provision to  other  persons  or   cir-
cumstances which can be given effect
without the invalid provision or appli-
cation.
       Subpart B—Alabama

§147.50 State-administered program—
   Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of Alabama, except those on
Indian lands, is the program adminis-
tered by the State Oil and Gas Board of
Alabama, approved by EPA pursuant to
section 1425  of the SDWA.  Notice of
this approval was published in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER on August 2, 1982 (47 FR
33268);  the effective date of this pro-
gram is August 2, 1982. This program
consists of the following elements, as
submitted to EPA in the  State's pro-
gram application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in  this para-
graph  are hereby  incorporated by  ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Alabama. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved  by the
Director of the  Federal Register  on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Code of Alabama  Sections  9-17-1
through 9-17-109 (Cumm. Supp. 1989);
  (2) State Oil and Gas Board of Ala-
bama Administrative Code, Oil and Gas
Report 1 (supplemented through May
1989), Rules and Regulations Governing
the Conservation of Oil and Gas in Ala-
bama,  and Oil and Gas Statutes of Ala-
bama with Oil and Gas Board Forms,
§400-1-2 and §400-1-5~.04.
  (b) The  Memorandum of Agreement
between EPA  Region IV and the Ala-
bama Oil and Gas  Board, signed by the
EPA Regional Administrator on June
15, 1982.
  (c) Statement of legal authority. "State
Oil and Gas Board has Authority to
Carry Out Underground Injection Con-
trol Program Relating to Class II Wells
as Described in Federal Safe Drinking
Water  Act—Opinion by Assistant  At-
torney General," May 28, 1982.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as  part of
the  application   or  as  supplements
thereto.

[49 PR 20197, May 11, 1984,  as amended at 53
FR 43086, Oct. 25,  1988; 56 FR 9411,  Mar. 6,
1991]
                                     734

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §147.52
§ 147.51  State-administered program—
    Class I, III, IV, and V wells.
  The  UIC program for Class I, III,  IV
and V wells  In the State of Alabama,
except  those  on Indian lands, is the
program administered by the Alabama
Department of Environmental Manage-
ment,  approved by  EPA pursuant  to
section 1422  of  the  SDWA. Notice  of
this approval was published in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER on August 25,  1983  (48
FR 38640); the effective date of this pro-
gram is August 25, 1983. This program
consists of the following elements,  as
submitted to  EPA in the  State's pro-
gram application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The  re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph  are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the  applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of  Alabama. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director  of  the  Federal Register  on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Alabama Water Pollution Control
Act, Code of Alabama 1975, sections 22-
22-1 through  22-22-14  (1980 and  Supp.
1983);
  (2) Regulations, Policies and Proce-
dures   of  the  Alabama  Water Im-
provement Commission, Title I (Regu-
lations)  (Rev.  December  1980),   as
amended May 17, 1982, to add Chapter 9,
Underground Injection Control  Regula-
tions  (effective  June   10,  1982).   as
amended April 6, 1983 (effective May  11,
1983).
  (b) The Memorandum  of Agreement
between EPA Region IV and the Ala-
bama   Department  of  Environment
Management,  signed by the EPA Re-
gional Administrator on May 24, 1983.
  (c) Statement of legal  authority.   (1)
"Water   Pollution—Public   Health-
State has Authority to Carry Out Un-
derground  Injection Control Program
Described  in  Federal Safe  Drinking
Water  Act—Opinion  by Legal  Counsel
for the Water Improvement Commis-
sion," June 25, 1982;
  (2) Letter from Attorney, Alabama
Water   Improvement  Commission,   to
Regional  Administrator, EPA  Region
IV,  "Re:  AWIC Response to  Phillip
Tate's (U.S.  EPA, Washington)  Com-
ments  on AWIC's Final Application for
Class I, III, IV, and V UIC Program,"
September 21, 1982;
  (3) Letter from Alabama Chief Assist-
ant  Attorney  General to  Regional
Counsel, EPA Region IV, "Re: Status of
Independent Legal Counsel in Alabama
Water Improvement Commission's Un-
derground Injection Control Program,"
September 14, 1982.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other  materials submitted as  part  of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.
[49 PR 20197, May 11, 1984.  as amended at 53
FR 43086, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.52 State-administered program—
   Hydraulic Fracturing of Coal Beds.
  The UIC  program for hydraulic frac-
turing of coal beds in the State of Ala-
bama,  except those on Indian lands, is
the program administered by the State
Oil  and  Gas Board of  Alabama, ap-
proved by  EPA pursuant to Section
1425 of the  SDWA on December 22, 1999
and effective on January 19, 2000. The
Alabama program consists of the fol-
lowing elements, as submitted to EPA
in the State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation  by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in State Oil and
Gas Board of Alabama Rule 400-4-1-.02,
Definitions, and Rule  400-4-5-.04, Pro-
tection of  Underground  Sources   of
Drinking Water during the Hydraulic
Fracturing of Coal Beds, are hereby in-
corporated by  reference and  made a
part  of the  applicable  UIC program
under the SDWA for the State of Ala-
bama.  This incorporation by reference
was  approved by the  Director of the
Federal Register on January 19, 2000  in
accordance with 5.  U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained  at
the State Oil and  Gas Board  of Ala-
bama, 420 Hackberry Lane, Tuscaloosa,
AL 35489-9780. Copies may be inspected
at the Environmental Protection Agen-
cy, Region  4, Water Management Divi-
sion.  Ground  Water/Drinking  Water
Branch, Ground Water & UIC  Section,
Sam Nunn  Atlanta Federal Center,  61
Forsyth Street, S.W., Rooml5-T53, At-
lanta, GA 30303-8960, or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For  information on the avail-
ability of this material at NARA, call
202-741-6030,   or   go   to:    http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
                                    735

-------
§147.60
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
code	of	federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (b) Addendum One, Underground In-
jection Control Program, Memorandum
of Agreement  Between  the State  of
Alabama  and  the  USEPA  Region  4,
signed by the Supervisor,  Alabama
State Oil and Gas Board on December
10,  1999,   and the  Regional  Adminis-
trator, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 4, on December 13,  1999.
  (c) Statement of  Legal Authority.  "I
hereby certify, pursuant to my author-
ity as  Attorney General for the State
of Alabama and for reasons set forth in
this statement, that in my opinion, the
laws of the State of Alabama provide
the State Oil and  Gas Board (herein-
after referred to as "the Board")  ade-
quate authority to carry out an Under-
ground Injection Program for the  con-
trol of underground injection activity
related to the hydraulic fracturing of
coal beds." Opinion by Alabama's At-
torney General Office, extracted from
Letter from  R. Craig Kneisel,  Chief,
Environmental Division, Office  of the
Attorney General,  dated  October  8,
1999, to Dr. Donald ¥. Oltz, Supervisor,
State Oil and  Gas Board of Alabama,
Subject:  Attorney General's Statement
for Final  Authorization  of Alabama
Class II Underground injection Control
Program.
  (d) The Program Description for the
Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing of
Coal  Beds  As  required  by  40  CFR
145.23—State Oil and Gas Board of Ala-
bama, including Appendices A through
F.

[65 FR 2897, Jan. 19, 2000]

§ 147.60  EPA-administered  program—
    Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in Ala-
bama is  administered by EPA.  This
program, consists of the UIC program
requirements of 40 CFR parts 124, 144,
146,  148  and  any  additional require-
ments set forth  in the remainder  of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply  with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Alabama is November 25,1988.
[53 FR 43086, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9411, Mar. 6, 1991]

        Subpart C—Alaska

§ 147.100   State-administered      pro-
   gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of Alaska,  other than those
on Indian lands, is the program admin-
istered by the Alaska Oil and Gas Con-
servation  Commission   approved  by
EPA pursuant to  section 1425 of  the
SDWA.  Notice of this  approval  was
published in  the  FEDERAL  REGISTER
[May 6, 1986]; the effective date of this
program  is June 19, 1986. This program
consists  of the following  elements, as
submitted to EPA in the State's pro-
gram application.
  (a) Incorporation  by  reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and  regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA  for
the State of Alaska. This incorporation
by reference was approved by the  Di-
rector of the Federal Register effective
June 19, 1986.
  (1) Alaska Statutes, Alaska Oil and
Gas   Conservation   Act,   Title   31,
§§31.05.005 through 31.30.010  (1979  and
Cum. Supp. 1984);
  (2) Alaska Statutes, Administrative
Procedures  Act,  Title  44,  §§44.62.010
through 44.62.650 (1984);
  (3) Alaska Administrative Code, Alas-
ka Oil and Gas Conservation  Commis-
sion,  20  A AC 25.005  through 20 A AC
25.570 (Supp. 1986).
  (b)  Memorandum  of Agreement.  The
Memorandum of Agreement  between
EPA Region 10, and the Alaska Oil and
Gas  Conservation  Commission,  signed
by the EPA Regional  Administrator on
January  29, 1986, as amended on June
21, 1988.
  (c)  Statement   of  Legal  Authority.
Statement from the Attorney General
of the State of Alaska, signed by  the
Assistant Attorney General on Decem-
ber 10, 1985.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
                                    736

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                             §147.104
the  original application or as supple-
ments thereto.
[51 FR 16684, May 6, 1986, as amended at 56
FR 9411, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.101  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program in the
State of Alaska for Class I, III, IV, and
V wells, and for all classes of wells on
Indian lands, is administered by EPA.
This program consists of the  UIC pro-
gram requirements of 40 CFR parts 124,
144,  146, 148, and any additional require-
ments set forth in  the remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
of the UIC program for all non-Class II
wells in Alaska and for all wells on In-
dian lands, is June 25, 1984.
[52 FR 17680, May 11, 1987, as amended at 56
FR 9412, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.102  Aquifer exemptions.
  (a)  This   section   identifies  any
aquifers or their portions exempted in
accordance with  §§144.7(b) and 146.4 of
this chapter  at the  time of  program
promulgation. EPA  may in the future
exempt other aquifers or portions, ac-
cording to applicable procedures, with-
out  codifying such exemptions in this
section. An updated list of exemptions
will be maintained in the Regional of-
fice.
  (b) The  following-  aquifers are  ex-
empted in accordance with the provi-
sions of §§144.7(b) and 146.4 of this chap-
ter   for  Class II  injection  activities
only:
  (1) The portions of aquifers in  the
Kenai Peninsula, greater than the indi-
cated depths below the ground surface,
and  described by a V* mile area beyond
and  lying directly below the following
oil and gas producing fields:
  (i) Swanson River Field—1700 feet.
  (ii) Beaver Creek Field—1650 feet.
  (iii) Kenai Gas Field—1300 feet.
  (2) The portion of aquifers beneath
Cook Inlet described by a Vi mile area
beyond and  lying  directly  below  the
following oil and gas producing fields:
  (i) Granite Point.
  (ii) McArthur River Field.
  (iii) Middle Ground Shoal Field.
  (iv) Trading Bay Field.
  (3)  The portions of aquifers on  the
North Slope described by a V* mile area
beyond and  lying directly  below  the
Kuparuk  River Unit  oil and gas pro-
ducing field.

§147.103  Existing Class I,  II (except
    enhanced  recovery   and  hydro-
    carbon storage) and III  wells  au-
    thorized by rule.
  Maximum  injection  pressure.  The
owner or  operator shall  limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating requirements of § 144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable; or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:
Pm=(0.733-0 433 Sg)d
where
Pm=in]ection pressure at the well head In
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific gravity of inject fluid (umtless)
d=injection depth in feet.

§147.104  Existing Class  II  enhanced
    recovery  and  hydrocarbon storage
    wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure. (1) To
meet  the operating  requirements  of
§144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this  chap-
ter, the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall use an  injection pressure no
greater than  the pressure established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall  establish   maximum  injection
pressures  after notice, opportunity for
comment, and opportunity for a public
hearing, according to  the provisions of
part 124, subpart A of  this chapter, and
will inform  owners and  operators  in
writing of  the  applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (ii)  May inject  at pressures greater
than   those   specified  in  paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for the field  or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits  a request  in writing
to  the Regional  Administrator,  and
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Regional  Administrator that such  in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement of  §144.28(f)(3)(ii)  (A)  and
(B). The Regional Administrator may
grant such a request  after notice, op-
portunity  for  comment,  and oppor-
tunity for a  public hearing,  according
                                     737

-------
§147.150
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
to the provisions of part 124, subpart A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the Regional
Administrator  establishes  rules  for
maximum injection  pressure based on
data  provided pursuant to paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)  of  this section the  owner or
operator shall:
  (i)  Limit  injection  pressure  to  a
value which will not exceed  the oper-
ating- requirements  of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii) Submit data  acceptable to the
Regional Administrator which defines
the fracture pressure of the formation
in which injection is  taking  place. A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two or more  operators conducting
operations in the same formation, if
the  Regional Administrator approves
such submission. The data shall be sub-
mitted to the Regional Administrator
within 1 year of the effective date  of
this program.
  (b)  Casing  and  cementing. Where the
Regional  Administrator  determines
that the  owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced recovery or hydrocarbon
storage well may not be in compliance
with the  requirements of §§ 144.28(e) and
146.22, the owner or operator shall com-
ply with paragraphs (b) (1) through (4)
of this section,  when  required by the
Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface casing by recir-
culating  the cement  to the  surface
from a point 50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all USDWs by placing
cement  between the outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2)  Isolate any injection  zones by
placing  sufficient cement to  fill the
calculated space between the  casing
and  the  well bore to  a point 250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the maximum  operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant  to deteriora-
tion  from   formation and  injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the calculated volume necessary  to
cement off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator may
specify other requirements in addition
to or in lieu  of the requirements  set
forth in paragraphs (b) (1) through (3)
as needed to protect USDWs.

        Subpart D—Arizona

§ 147.150  State-administered  program.
   [Reserved]

§ 147.151  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program that
applies to all injection activities in Ar-
izona, including  those  on Indian lands,
is administered by EPA. The UIC pro-
gram for Navajo Indian lands consists
of the requirements contained in sub-
part HHH of this part.  The program for
all  injection activity  except that on
Navajo Indian lands consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148,  and any additional re-
quirements set forth in  the remainder
of this subpart.  Injection well owners
and  operators, and EPA shall  comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective  dates. The effective date
for the UIC program in Arizona, except
for the lands of  the Navajo Indians, is
June 25, 1984. The effective date for the
UIC  program on the lands of the Nav-
ajo is November 25. 1988.
[53 FR 43086, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9412, Mar. 6, 1991]

§147.152 Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
   served]

       Subpart E—Arkansas

§ 147.200 State-administered      pro-
   gram—Class I, III, IV, and V wells.
  The UIC  program for Class I,  III, IV
and  V wells in the State of Arkansas,
except those wells on Indian lands, is
the program administered by the Ar-
kansas Department of Pollution Con-
trol  and Ecology approved by EPA pur-
suant to section 1422 of the SDWA. No-
tice  of this approval  was published  in
the FEDERAL REGISTER on July 6, 1982
(47 FR 29236); the effective date  of this
program is July 6, 1982. This program
consists  of the following elements,  as
submitted  to EPA in  the State's pro-
gram application.
  (a)  Incorporation by  reference.  The
requirements  set  forth in the  State
statutes and regulations cited in this
paragraph  are hereby  incorporated by
                                    738

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §147.205
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Arkansas. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the  Federal Register  on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Arkansas Water and Air Pollution
Control Act, Act 472 of 1949 as amend-
ed, Arkansas Statutes Annotated sec-
tions 82-1901 through 82-1943 (1976);
  (2) Act 105 of 1939, Arkansas Statutes
Annotated  sections 53-101  through  53-
130 (1971 and Supp. 1981); Act 937 of 1979,
Arkansas Statutes Annotated sections
53-1301 through 53-1320 (Supp. 1981); Act
523 of 1981;
  (3)  Arkansas Underground Injection
Control Code, Department of Pollution
Control and Ecology, promulgated Jan-
uary 22, 1982;
  (4) General Rule and Regulations, Ar-
kansas Oil  and Gas Commission (Order
No. 2-39, revised July 1972);
  (5) Arkansas  Hazardous Waste  Man-
agement Code, Department  of Pollu-
tion Control and Ecology, promulgated
August 21, 1981.
  (b)  The Memorandum  of Agreement
and  Addendum  No. 1 to  the Memo-
randum of Agreement, between  EPA
Region  VI  and the  Arkansas Depart-
ment of Pollution Control and Ecology
and the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commis-
sion,  signed by the EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator on May 25, 1982.
  (c)  Statement of  legal  authority.  (1)
Letter from Chief Attorney, Arkansas
Department of Pollution Control and
Ecology, to Acting Regional Adminis-
trator, EPA Region VI, "Re: Legal Au-
thority of the Department of Pollution
Control and Ecology of the  State of Ar-
kansas to Administer an Underground
Injection Control Program,"  July  29,
1981;
  (2) Letter from Chief Attorney, Ar-
kansas Department  of Pollution Con-
trol  and Ecology, to Acting Regional
Counsel, EPA  Region VI, "Re; Adden-
dum to Legal Statement—Underground
Injection Control Program," October 13,
1981;
  (3) Letter from General Counsel, Ar-
kansas  Oil and  Gas Commission,  to
Acting Regional Counsel. EPA Region
VI, "Re: Supplemental  Addendum  to
Legal Statement—Underground Injec-
tion  Control  Program,"  October  20,
1981;
  (4) Letter from  Chief Attorney, Ar-
kansas  Department  of Pollution Con-
trol and Ecology, to Attorney, Office of
Regional Counsel,  EPA Region VI (re:
status as independent legal counsel),
December 31, 1981;
  (5) Letter from General Counsel, Ar-
kansas  Oil  and Gas Commission,  to
Acting Regional Counsel, EPA Region
VI, "Re: Supplemental Addendum  to
Legal Statement—Underground Injec-
tion  Control  Program,"  January  13.
1982;
  (6) Letter from Chief Counsel, Arkan-
sas Department of  Pollution Control
and Ecology, to Acting Regional Coun-
sel, EPA Region VI,  "Re: Addendum  to
Legal Statement—Underground Injec-
tion Control  Program,"  February  15.
1982;
  (7) Letter from Chief Counsel, Arkan-
sas Department of  Pollution Control
and Ecology, to Acting Regional Coun-
sel, EPA Region VI,  "Re: Addendum  to
Legal Statement—Underground Injec-
tion Control Program," May 13, 1982.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part  of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.

[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43086, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.201 State-administered      pro-
    gram—Class II wells. [Reserved]

§ 147.205 EPA-administered program—
    Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in Ar-
kansas  is administered by EPA. This
program consists of the UIC program
requirements of 40 CFR parts 124, 144,
146,  148  and  any  additional  require-
ments set forth in this subpart. Injec-
tion well owners  and operators,  and
EPA shall comply with these require-
ments.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands  in
Arkansas is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43086. Oct. 25. 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9412, Mar 6, 1991]
                                    739

-------
§147.250
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
       Subpart F—California

§ 147.250  State-administered      pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of California, except those on
Indian lands,  is the program adminis-
tered by the California Division of  Oil
and Gas, approved by EPA pursuant to
SDWA section 1425.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The  re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph  are hereby  incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the  SDWA  for
the State of California. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director  of the Federal Register  on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) California  Laws for Conservation
of Petroleum  and  Gas, California Pub-
lic  Resources Code Div. 3,  Chapt.  1,
§§3000-3359 (1989);
  (2) California Administrative Code,
title 14, §§1710 to 1724.10 (May 28, 1988).
  (b) The Memorandum of Agreement
between  EPA  Region IX  and the Cali-
fornia  Division  of Oil and Gas,  signed
by the EPA Regional Administrator on
September 29, 1982.
  (c) Statement  of legal  authority.  (1)
Letter from California Deputy  Attor-
ney General to the  Administrator of
EPA,  "Re: Legal  Authority of Cali-
fornia  Division of  Oil and Gas to Carry
Out Class II Injection Well  Program,"
April 1, 1981;
  (2) Letter from California Deputy At-
torney General  to Chief  of California
Branch, EPA Region IX, "Re: California
Application for  Primacy, Class II UIC
Program," December 3, 1982.
  (d) The  Program Description and any
other  materials submitted as part of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.
[49 FR  20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 52
PR  17681,  May 11, 1987; 56 FR 9412,  Mar. 6,
1991]

§ 147.251   EPA-administered  program—
    Class  I, III, IV and V wells and  In-
    dian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program in the
State  of California for Class I, III,  IV
and V  wells, and for all classes of wells
on  Indian lands,  is administered  by
EPA. The program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements  set forth in the remainder
of this  subpart. Injection well  owners
and operators, and EPA  shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates.  The effective date
for the UIC program for  all lands in
California,  including Indian  lands, is
June 25, 1984.

[52 FR 17681,  May 11, 1987, as amended at 56
FR 9412, Mar.  6, 1991]

§147.252  Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
   served]

§147.253  Existing Class  I, II (except
   enhanced  recovery   and  hydro-
   carbon storage)  and  III wells au-
   thorized by rule.
  Maximum  injection  pressure.  The
owner or operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable; or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:

Pm=(0.733-0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=injection pressure at the well  head in
  pounds per square Inch
Sg=specific gravity of inject fluid (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.

       Subpart G—Colorado

§ 147.300  State-administered      pro-
   gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of Colorado,  except  those
wells on Indian Lands, is the program
administered by the  Colorado Oil and
Gas Commission approved by EPA pur-
suant to section 1425 of the SDWA. No-
tice of this  approval was published in
the FR on April 2, 1984 (49 FR 13040);
the effective date  of this program is
April 2, 1984. This program consists of
the following elements, as submitted to
EPA in the State's  program applica-
tion:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The  re-
quirements  set forth in the State  stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA  for
                                     740

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §147.301
the State of Colorado. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the OPR in accordance with
5 U.S.C.  552(a)  and  1 CFR part 51. Cop-
ies may be  obtained  at  the  State of
Colorado Oil  and Gas  Conservation
Commission, Department of  Natural
Resources,  Suite  380 Logan  Tower
Building, 1580  Logan Street,  Denver,
Colorado, 80203.  Copies  may  be in-
spected at the Environmental Protec-
tion  Agency,  Region  VIII,  999  18th
Street,   Suite  500, Denver,  Colorado,
80202-2405, or at the National Archives
and  Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of
this material  at NARA, call  202-741-
6030,  or  go  to: http://www.archives.gov/
federal	register/
code	of_Jederal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1)  Colorado  Revised Statutes, 1989
replacement volume, Section 34-60-101
through 34-60-123;
  (2)  Colorado  Revised Statutes, 1989
replacement volume,  Section  25-8-101
through 25-8-612;
  (3) Rules  and Regulations,  Rules of
Practice and Procedure,  and  Oil and
Gas  Conservation  Act (As  Amended)
Department of Natural Resources, Oil
and  Gas Conservation  Commission of
the  State  of  Colorado  (revised  July
1989);
  (4) Oil and Gas Conservation Commis-
sion Revised Rules and Regulations in
the 300, 400, 500, and 600 series, effective
March 20, 1989.
  (b)  Memorandum  of agreement.  The
Memorandum  of Agreement between
EPA Region VIII and the Colorado Oil
and   Gas  Conservation  Commission,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on March 3, 1984 and amended on
August 30, 1989.
  (c)  Statement of  legal authority. (1)
Letter from Colorado Assistant Attor-
ney  General to  the  Acting Regional
Counsel,  EPA Region VIII, "Re: Class II
Well  Underground Injection  Control
Program of Colorado  Oil and Gas Con-
servation Commission", March 15, 1983;
  (2)  Letter  from  Colorado  Assistant
Attorney General  to  the Acting Re-
gional Counsel. EPA Region VIII, "Re:
Class II  Well  Injection  Control  Pro-
gram of Colorado  Oil and  Gas  Con-
servation Commission", April 29, 1983;
  (3) Letter  from  Colorado Assistant
Attorney  General  to  the Acting  Re-
gional  Counsel, EPA Region VIII, "Re:
Class II Underground Injection Control
Program of Colorado Oil and Gas Con-
servation  Commission, interpretation
of C.R.S. 1973. 34-60-110", July 11, 1983;
  (4) Letter  from  Colorado Assistant
Attorney  General  to  the Acting  Re-
gional  Counsel, EPA Region VIII, "Re:
Class II Well  Underground Injection
Control Program  of Colorado  Oil  and
Gas  Conservation  Commission",  Feb-
ruary 17, 1984;
  (5) Memorandum from  Colorado As-
sistant Attorney General to the Acting
Regional  Counsel,  EPA  Region VIII,
"Re:  Authority to set and enforce max-
imum pressure for injecting fluids into
Class II wells with existing permits",
March 7, 1984.
  (d) Program description. The Program
Description and  any  other materials
submitted as part  of the application or
as supplements thereto:
  (1) Application   and accompanying
materials  for approval  of Colorado's
UIC  program for  Class II wells sub-
mitted by the Director of the Colorado
Oil and Gas  Conservation Commission
to the Regional Administrator, May 3,
1983;
  (2)  Supplemental   amendment   to
Colorado's application for primacy for
the UIC program for Class II wells de-
scribing the process through which the
State will ensure  enforceable limits for
maximum  injection pressure,  describ-
ing the Commission's plan of adminis-
tration for Class  II wells, and  describ-
ing Mechanical  Integrity  Test proce-
dures for Class II wells, March 7, 1984;
  (3)  Official   correspondence   con-
cerning various  program  issues  be-
tween the  Colorado Oil and Gas  Con-
servation Commission and EPA Region
VIII, for the  period from March 7, 1984
to May 8, 1989.

[56 FR 9412, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.301  EPA-administered program—
   Class I, III, IV, V wells  and Indian
   lands.
  (a) Contents.  The UIC  program for
Class I, III, IV and V wells on all lands
in Colorado, including Indian lands,
and for  Class II wells on Indian lands.
is  administered by EPA. The program
                                     741

-------
§147.302
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
for all EPA-administered wells in Colo-
rado other than Class II wells on the
lands of the Ute Mountain Ute consists
of the UIC program requirements of 40
CFR parts 124, 144, 146, 148, and any ad-
ditional requirements set  forth in the
remainder of this  subpart.  Injection
well owners and operators, and EPA
shall comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
for the UIC program on  all lands in
Colorado, including Indian  lands, ex-
cept for Class II wells on  lands of the
Ute Mountain Ute, is June 25, 1984.

[52 FB 17681, May 11,  1987, as amended at 56
PR 9413, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.302  Aquifer exemptions.

  (a)   This  section  identifies  any
aquifers of their portions  exempted in
accordance  with §§144.7(b) and 146.4 of
this  chapter at  the time of  program
promulgation. EPA may in the future
exempt other aquifers or  portions ac-
cording to applicable procedures with-
out codifying such exemptions in this
section. An updated list of exemptions
will be maintained in the  Regional  of-
fice.
  (b) For  all aquifers into  which exist-
ing Class II  wells are injecting, those
portions within  a V4 mile radius of the
well  are exempted for the purpose of
Class II injection activities only.

§147.303  Existing  Class I, II (except
   enhanced  recovery  and  hydro-
   carbon storage) and III wells au-
   thorized by rule.

  Maximum   injection   pressure.  The
owner or  operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will  not exceed the
operating requirements  of §144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable; or
  (b) A value for wellhead pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula;

Pm=(O.Y33-0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=injeotion  pressure at  the wellhead  In
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific  gravity   of  injected  fluid
  (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.
§147.304  Existing  Class II enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage
    wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure.  (1) To
meet  the  operating  requirements of
§144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap-
ter, the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall use an injection  pressure no
greater than  the  pressure  established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall  establish such a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment,  and  opportunity  for  a  public
hearing, according to the provisions of
part 124, subpart A of this chapter, and
will inform  owners and operators in
writing  of  the applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (ii)  May inject  at  pressures greater
than  those   specified  in   paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for the field or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits  a request in writing
to  the   Regional   Administrator  and
demonstrates to the satisfaction  of the
Regional  Administrator that such  in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirements  of § 144.28(f)(3)(ii)  (A)  and
(B). The Regional  Administrator may
grant such a request  after  notice, op-
portunity  for  comment,  and oppor-
tunity for a public hearing, according
to the provisions of part 124, subpart A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the Regional
Administrator  establishes   rules   for
maximum injection pressures based on
data provided  pursuant to  paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of  this section the owner or
operator shall:
  (i)  Limit  injection  pressure  to  a
value which will not exceed the oper-
ating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii)  Submit data acceptable to  the
Regional  Administrator which defines
the fracture pressure of the formation
in which injection is taking place. A
single test may be  submitted on  behalf
of two  or more  operators  conducting
operations in the  same  formation, if
the Regional Administrator approves
such submission. The data shall be sub-
mitted to the Regional Administrator
within one year of the effective date of
this program.
                                     742

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §147.305
  (b)  Casing and cementing. Where the
Regional   Administrator   determines
that the owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced  recovery  or hydrocarbon
storage well may not be in compliance
with the requirements of §§ 144.28(e) and
146.22, the owner or operator shall com-
ply with paragraphs (b) (1) through (4)
of this section, when required  by the
Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface  casing by recir-
culating the  cement  to  the surface
from a point  50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all USDWs  by placing
cement between the  outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2)  Isolate  any injection zones  by
placing sufficient cement to  fill  the
calculated  space  between the  casing
and  the well  bore to a point  250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand  the  maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistent to deteriora-
tion  from  formation  and  injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In quantity no less than 120% of
the calculated volume necessary to ce-
ment off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator may
specify other  requirements in addition
to or in lieu  of the  requirements set
forth in paragraphs  (b) (1) through (3)
as needed to protect USDWs.

§ 147.305 Requirements for all wells.
  (a) The owner or operator converting
an existing well to an injection well
shall check the condition of the casing
with one of the following logging tools:
  (1) A Pipe analysis log; or
  (2) A Caliper log.
  (b)  The owner or operator of a new
injection well  cased with plastic (PVC,
ABS, and others) casings shall:
  (1) Not construct a well deeper than
500 feet;
  (2) Use cement and additives compat-
ible with such casing material;
  (3) Cement  the annular space  above
the injection interval from the bottom
of the blank casing to the surface.
  (c) The owner or operator of a newly
drilled well shall install centralizers as
directed  by  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator.
  (d) The owner or operator shall as re-
quired by the Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i)  Setting  surface casing  50 feet
below   the  base  of  the  lowermost
USDW;
  (ii) Cementing surface casing by re-
circulating  the cement to the surface
from a  point  50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (iii) Isolating all USDWs by placing
cement between the outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2)  Isolate  any  injection  zones by
placing sufficient  cement to  fill the
calculated  space between the casing
and  the well  bore to  a  point  250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand  the maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant to  deteriora-
tion  from  formation  and  injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the calculated volume necessary to
cement off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator may
approve alternate  casing and cement-
ing practices  provided that the owner
or  operator demonstrates  that such
practices   will  adequately   protect
USDWs.
  (e) Area  of  review. Notwithstanding
the alternatives presented in §146.6 of
this chapter, the area of review shall be
a fixed  radius as described in §146.6(b)
of this chapter.
  (f) The applicant must give separate
notice of intent to apply for a permit
to each owner or tenant  of the land
within  one-quarter  mile of the site.
The addresses of those to whom notice
is given, and a description of how no-
tice  is given,  shall be submitted with
the  permit  application.  The  notice
shall include:
  (1) Name and address of applicant;
  (2) A brief description of the  planned
injection activities,  including  well lo-
cation, name and depth of the injection
zone, maximum injection pressure and
volume, and fluid to be injected;
  (3) EPA contact person; and
  (4) A statement  that opportunity to
comment will  be announced after EPA
                                    743

-------
§ 147.350
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
prepares a draft permit. This require-
ment may be waived by the Regional
Administrator  when  he  determines
that individual notice to all land own-
ers and tenants would be impractical.

      Subpart H—Connecticut

§ 147.350  State-administered program.
  The  UIC program for all classes  of
wells  in  the  State of  Connecticut,
except those wells on Indian.lands,  is
the program administered by the Con-
necticut Department of Environmental
Protection approved by EPA pursuant
to section 1422 of the SDWA. Notice  of
this  approval was  published in the FB
on March 26, 1984 (49 PR 11179); the ef-
fective date  of this program is March
26, 1984. This program consists of the
following  elements, as  submitted to
EPA  in the  State's program applica-
tion:
  (a) Incorporation by reference.  The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph  are hereby  incorporated by ref-
erence and made part of the applicable
UIC  program under the SDWA for the
State  of Connecticut.  This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the OFR in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and CFR part 51. Copies
may be obtained at the State  of Con-
necticut,   Department  of  Environ-
mental Protection, State Office Build-
ing, 165 Capitol Avenue, Hartford. Con-
necticut,  06106.  Copies may  be  in-
spected at the Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency, Region I,  John F. Ken-
nedy Federal Building, room 2203, Bos-
ton,  Massachusetts, 02203, or at the Na-
tional Archives and Records Adminis-
tration (NARA). For  information on
the  availability  of this material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of_federal	regulations/
ibr	locations. html.
  (1) Connecticut General Statutes An-
notated, title 22a (Environmental Pro-
tection),  chapter   439,  sections  22a-l
through 22a-27 (1985 and Cumm.  Supp.
1990);
  (2) Connecticut General Statutes An-
notated, Title 22a  '.Environmental Pro-
tection), Chapter 446K (1985 and Cumm.
Supp. 1990).
  (b)  Memorandum  of Agreement.  The
Memorandum of Agreement  between
EPA Region I and the Connecticut De-
partment of Environmental Protection,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on August 9, 1983.
  (c)  Statement  of  legal authority. (1)
Statement from the Attorney General
of the State  of Connecticut, signed by
the Attorney General on May 8, 1981;
  (2) Addendum to the Statement from
the Attorney General of the  State  of
Connecticut,  signed by the  Attorney
General on May 10, 1983.
  (d) Program Description. The Program
Description and  any other materials
submitted as part of the application  or
as supplements thereto.
[56 FR 9413, Mar. 6, 1991]

§§ 147.351-147.352 [Reserved]

§147.353 EPA-administered program-
    Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in Con-
necticut is administered by EPA. This
program consists of the UIC  program
requirements of 40  CFR parts 124, 144,
146,  148, and any  additional  require-
ments set  forth  in the remainder  of
this subpart.  Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective  date
of the UIC program for  Indian lands  in
Connecticut is November 25, 1988.
(53 PE 43086, Oct. 25, 1988,  as amended  at 56
FR 9413, Mar. 6, 1991]

§§ 147.354-147.359  [Reserved]

        Subpart I—Delaware

§ 147.400 State-administered program.
  The  UIC program for all classes  of
wells in the  State of Delaware, except
those wells on Indian lands, is the pro-
gram administered  by  the  Delaware
Department  of Natural Resources and
Environmental  Control  approved by
EPA  pursuant to section 1422  of the
SDWA. Notice  of  this approval  was
published in the FR on  April 5, 1984 (49
FR 13525); the effective date of this pro-
gram is May 7, 1984. This program con-
sists of the following elements,  as sub-
mitted to EPA in the State's  program
application:
                                    744

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            § 147.500
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are  hereby  incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Delaware. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the OFR in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and  1 CFR part 51. Copies
may be obtained at the Delaware De-
partment of Natural Resources and En-
vironmental  Control,  89  Kings  High-
way, P.O.  Box 1401, Dover, Delaware,
19903. Copies may be inspected  at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Re-
gion III, 841 Chestnut Street,  Philadel-
phia, Pennsylvania, 19107, or at the Na-
tional Archives and Records  Adminis-
tration  (NARA). For information  on
the  availability  of this  material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go  to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of	federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1) Delaware Environmental Protec-
tion Act,  (Environmental  Control)  7
Delaware Code Annotated, Chapter 60,
Sections 6001-6060  (Revised  1974 and
Cumm. Supp. 1988);
  (2) State of  Delaware  Regulations
Governing  Underground Injection Con-
trol, parts  122, 124  and 146 (Department
of  Natural Resources  and  Environ-
mental  Control),  effective  August 15,
1983.
  (b) Memorandum  of agreement. The
Memorandum   of  Agreement  between
EPA Region III and the Delaware De-
partment of Natural Resources and En-
vironmental  Control, signed  by the
EPA Regional Administrator on March
28, 1984.
  (c) Statement of legal authority. State-
ment of the Delaware  Attorney  Gen-
eral for  the   Underground   Injection
Control Program, signed by the Attor-
ney General on January 26, 1984.
  (d) Program Description.  The  Program
Description and any other  materials
submitted  as  part of the application
(August  10, 1983),  or as  supplements
thereto (October 14, 1983).

 56 PR 9413, Mar. 6, 1991]
§§ 147.401-147.402  [Reserved]

§147.403 EPA-administered program—
    Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in Dela-
ware is administered by EPA. This pro-
gram consists of the UIC  program re-
quirements of 40 CFR parts 124, 144, 146,
148, and any additional requirements
set forth in the remainder of this sub-
part. Injection  well owners and opera-
tors and EPA shall comply with these
requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The  effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Delaware is November 25, 1988.
[53 FB 43086, Oct. 25,
FR 9413, Mar. 6, 1991]
8, as amended at 56
§§ 147.404-147.449  [Reserved]

  Subpart J—District of Columbia

§ 147.450 State-administered program.
    [Reserved]

§ 147.451 EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
District of Columbia, including any In-
dian lands in  the District, is adminis-
tered by EPA. This program consists of
the UIC program  requirements of 40
CFR parts 124, 144, 146, 148, and any ad-
ditional requirements set forth in the
remainder  of this subpart. Injection
well owners  and operators, and  EPA
shall comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective  date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
the District of Columbia is November
25, 1988. The effective date for the UIC
program in the  rest of the District is
June 25, 1984.
[53 FR 43087, Oct. 25, 1988,  as amended at 56
FR 9413, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.452 Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
    served]

        Subpart K—Florida

§ 147.500 State-administered      pro-
    gram—Class I, III, IV, and V wells.
  The UIC program for  Class I, III, IV,
and V wells in the  State of Florida, ex-
cept for those on Indian lands is admin-
istered by  the Florida  Department of
Environmental Regulations, approved
                                    745

-------
§147.501
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
by EPA pursuant to section 1422 of the
SDWA. Notice  of  this approval  was
published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on
February 7, 1983 (48 FR 5556); the effec-
tive date of this program is March 9,
1983. This program consists  of the fol-
lowing elements, as submitted to EPA
in the  State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph  are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble  UIC program under the SDWA for
the State  of Florida. This  incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director  of  the  Federal Register on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Florida Air and  Water Pollution
Control Act, Florida Statutes  Anno-
tated  sections  403.011 through 403.90
(1973 and Supp. 1983);
  (2) Chapter 17-28, Underground Injec-
tion Control,  Florida  Administrative
Code (April 27, 1989).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations  although  not  incor-
porated by  reference,  also  are  part  of
the approved State-administered  pro-
gram:
  (1) Administrative  Procedures Act,
Florida Statutes Chapter 120;
  (2)   Florida  Administrative  Code,
Chapter   17-1  (1982)  (Administrative
Procedures Act);
  (3)   Florida  Administrative  Code,
Chapter   17-3  (1982)  (Water  Quality
Standards);
  (4)   Florida  Administrative  Code,
Chapter 17-4 (1982) (Permits);
  (5)   Florida  Administrative  Code,
Chapter  28-5 (1982)  (Decisions Deter-
mining Substantial Interests);
  (6)   Florida  Administrative  Code,
Chapter 28-6 (1982) (Licensing);
  (c) The Memorandum of Agreement
between EPA Region IV and the Flor-
ida  Department of Environmental Reg-
ulation,  signed by the EPA Regional
Administrator on March 31,  1983.
  (d) Statement  of  legal authority.  (1)
"Statement of Legal Authority for Im-
plementation of Underground Injection
Control Program"  and accompanying
certifications, signed by General Coun-
sel for the Florida Department of Envi-
ronmental  Regulation,  January  14,
1982;
  (2) "Addendum to Statement of Leg-al
Authority  for  Implementation of Un-
derground  Injection Control Program"
and    accompanying    certifications,
signed by  Acting General Counsel  for
the  Florida  Department  of Environ-
mental Regulation, September 20, 1982.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials  submitted as part of
the original  application or  as supple-
ments thereto.

[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43087,  Oct. 25, 1988;  56 FR 9414, Mar. 6,
1991]

§147.501  EPA-administered  program—
   Class II wells  and Indian lands.

  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands and for
Class II  wells  on non-Indian lands in
the State of Florida is administered by
EPA. This  program consists  of the UIC
program  requirements of 40  CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth in the  remainder
of this subpart. Injection well owners
and  operators,  and EPA  shall comply
with these  requirements.
  (b) Effective dates.  The effective date
of the UIC  program for Indian lands in
Florida is November 25. 1988. The effec-
tive  date for Class II wells on non-In-
dian lands is December 30, 1984.

[53 FR 43087, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9414, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.502  Aquifer  exemptions.    [Re-
   served]

§147.503  Existing Class II (except  en-
   hanced recovery and hydrocarbon
   storage) wells authorized by rule.

  Maximum injection pressure. To meet
the    operating    requirements    of
§144.28(f)(3)(i)   of this  chapter,  the
owner or operator shall use an injec-
tion pressure at the well head no great-
er than the pressure calculated using
the following formula:

Pm=(0.733-0.433 Sg)d
where.
Pm=injection pressure at the wel] head ir
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific  gravity  of  injected  fluic
  (unitless;
d=injection depth in feet.

[49 FR 45306,  Nov. 15, 1984]
                                     746

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §147.550
§147.504  Existing  Class II enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage
    wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure.  (1) To
meet the  operating   requirements of
§144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap-
ter, the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall use an injection  pressure no
greater than  the pressure  established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in  which the well is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall establish such a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment  and  opportunity for  a public
hearing, according  to  the provisions of
part 124, subpart A  of  this chapter, and
will inform  owners and operators in
writing  of  the  applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (ii) May inject at   pressure greater
than   those   specified  in   paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for the field or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits a request in writing
to  the Regional  Administrator,  and
demonstrates to the satisfaction  of the
Regional  Administrator that such  in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement of  §144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A)  and
(B).  The Regional  Administrator may
grant such a request  after notice, op-
portunity  for  comment,  and  oppor-
tunity for a public hearing, according
to the provisions of part 124, subpart A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the Regional
Administrator  establishes  rules  for
maximum injection pressure based on
data  provided  pursuant to  paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of  this section the owner or
operator shall:
  (i)  Limit  injection pressure   to  a
value which  will not  exceed the  oper-
ating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii) Submit data acceptable to the
Regional  Administrator which defines
the fracture pressure  of the formation
in which injection  is taking place. A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two  or more  operators  conducting
operations in the  same  formation, if
the Regional Administrator approves
such submission. The  data shall be sub-
mitted to the Regional  Administrator
within 1 year of the  effective date of
this program.
  (b) Casing and  cementing. Where the
Regional   Administrator   determines
that the owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced recovery  or  hydrocarbon
storage well may not be in compliance
with the requirements of §§144.28(e) and
146.22,  the  owner  or  operator  shall,
when required by the Regional Admin-
istrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface  casing by recir-
culating the  cement  to  the surface
from a point 50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all USDWs by placing
cement between the  outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2) Isolate any injection zones  by
placing sufficient cement to  fill the
calculated  space  between  the  casing
and  the  well bore  to a point 250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the  maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant  to  deteriora-
tion from  formation  and  injection
fluids:  and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the  calculated volume necessary to
cement off a zone.
  (4) Comply with  other  requirements
which the Regional Administrator may
specify either in addition  to or in lieu
of the  requirements set forth in  para-
graphs (b)(l) through (3) of this section
as needed to protect USDWs.
  (c) Area  of  review. Notwithstanding
the alternatives presented in §146.06 of
this chapter, the area of review shall be
a minimum fixed radius as described in
§ 146.06(b) of this chapter.

(The information collection requirements
contained  in  paragraph   (a)(2)(ii)  were
appoved by  the Office of  Management and
Budget under control number 2040-0042)

[49 FR 45306, Nov. 15, 1984]


        Subpart L—Georgia

§ 147.550 State-administered program.

  The  UIC program for all classes of
wells in the State of Georgia,  except
                                     747

-------
§§147.551-147.552
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
those wells on Indian lands, is the pro-
gram administered by the Georgia De-
partment of Natural Resources. Envi-
ronmental  Protection  Division  ap-
proved by EPA pursuant to section 1422
of the SDWA.  Notice  of this approval
was  published in  the FEDERAL  REG-
ISTER on April 19, 1984 (49 FR 15553); the
effective date of this  program is May
21, 1984.  This program consists of the
following elements,  as submitted  to-
EPA  in  the  State's program applica-
tion:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited  in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the  SDWA for
the State of Georgia. This  incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the OFR in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and  1 CFR part 51. Cop-
ies may be obtained at the Georgia De-
partment of Natural Resources, Envi-
ronmental  Protection  Division,  270
Washington   Street,   SW.,    Atlanta,
Georgia. 30334. Copies may be inspected
at the Environmental Protection Agen-
cy, Region  IV, 345 Courtland  Street,
NE., Atlanta, Georgia, 30365,  or at the
National Archives and Records Admin-
istration (NARA).  For information on
the  availability of this  material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030,  or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of ^federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1) Oil and Gas and Deep Drilling Act
of 1975,  Official Code  of Georgia Anno-
tated (O.C.G.A.) §§12-4-40 through 12-4-
53 (1988);
  (2)  Ground  Water Use Act of 1972,
O.C.G.A.  §§12-5-90  through  12-5-107
(1988);
  (3) Water Well Standards Act of 1985,
O.C.G.A.  §§12-5-120,  through 12-5-138
(1988);
  (4) Georgia Administrative Procedure
Act, O.C.G.A. §§50-13-1 through 50-13-22
(Reprinted from  the O.C.G.A.  and 1988
Cumm. Supp.);
  (5)  Georgia Water  Quality Control
Act, O.C.G.A. §§12-5-20 through 12-5-53
(1988):
  (6) Georgia Hazardous Waste Manage-
ment Act, O.C.G.A. §§12-8-60 through
12-8-83 (1988);
  (7) Georgia Safe Drinking Water Act
of 1977, O.C.G.A. §§12-5-170 through 12-
5-193 (1988);
  (8) Rules  of  Georgia Department of
Natural   Resources,   Environmental
Protection  Division,  Water  Quality
Control, GA. COMP. R. & REGS. Chap-
ter 391-3-6-.13 (Revised July 28, 1988).
  (b)  Memorandum of Agreement.  The
Memorandum  of  Agreement  between
EPA Region IV and the  State of Geor-
gia, signed March 1, 1984.
  (c) Statement of legal authority. (1) Un-
official Opinion of the Georgia Attor-
ney  General,  Op.  Atty. Gen. 080-24,
June 12, 1980;
  (2)  Underground  Injection  Control
Program,  Attorney  General's State-
ment, February 4, 1982;
  (3)   Amended  Attorney   General's
Statement  Relating  to  Authority of
the State of Georgia to  Implement an
Underground  Injection  Control  Pro-
gram, April  22,  1983;
  (4) Letter to EPA Office of General
Counsel from Senior Assistant Attor-
ney General "Re: State UIC  Program",
July 13, 1983.
  (d) Program Description. The Program
Description  and  any  other  materials
submitted as part of the application or
as supplements thereto.
[56 PR 9414, Mar. 6, 1991; 56  FR 14150, Apr. 5,
1991]

§§ 147.551-147.552  [Reserved]

§ 147.553 EPA-administered  program—
   Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State  of Georgia is administered by
EPA. This program consists  of the UIC
program requirements of 40  CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements  set forth in  the  remainder
of this subpart. Injection well owners
and  operators, and EPA shall  comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Georgia is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43087.  Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 5(
FR 9414, Mar.  6, 1991]
                                     748

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

§§ 147.554-147.559  [Reserved]

        Subpart M—Hawaii

§ 147.600  State-administered program.
    [Reserved]

§ 147.601  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
State of Hawaii, including- all Indian
lands,  is  administered by  EPA.  This
program consists of the UIC program
requirements of 40 CFR parts  124, 144,
146,  148, and  any  additional  require-
ments  set forth  in the remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian  lands in
Hawaii  is November 25, 1988. The effec-
tive date for the UIC program for all
other lands in Hawaii is December 30,
1984.
[53 PR 43087, Oct. 25, 1988,  as amended at 56
FB 9414, Mar 6, 1991]

         Subpart N—Idaho

§ 147.650  State-administrative     pro-
    gram—Class  I,  II,  III,  IV,  and V
    wells.
  The UIC program for Class I, II, III,
IV, and V wells in  the  State of Idaho,
other than those on Indian lands, is the
program administered by the Idaho De-
partment of Water Resources, approved
by EPA pursuant to section 1422 of the
SDWA.  Notice of  this approval  was
published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on
June 7, 1985; the  effective date of this
program is July 22, 1985. This program
consists of the following elements, as
submitted to EPA  in the State's pro-
gram application.
  (a) Incorporation by  reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the  State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made  a part of the  applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Idaho. This incorporation
by reference was approved  by the Di-
rector of the Federal Register effective
July 22, 1985.
  (1) Public Writings, Title 9,  Chapter
3, Idaho Code, sections 9-301 through 9-
302 (Bobbs-Merrill 1979);
                            §147.650

  (2) Crimes and Punishments, Title 18,
Chapter 1, Idaho Code, sections  18-113
through 18-114  (Bobbs-Merrill 1979  and
Supp. 1984);
  (3) Department  of  Health and Wel-
fare, Title 39,  Chapter 1, Idaho  Code,
Chapter 39-108 (Bobbs-Merrill 1977);
  (4) Drainage-Water Rights and Rec-
lamation, Title 42,  Chapter  2,  Idaho
Code  sections  42-237(e);  section  42-238
(Bobbs-Merrill 1977 and Supp. 1984);
  (5) Department  of Water  Resources-
Water Resources Board, Title 42,  Chap-
ter 17, Idaho Code, sections  42-1701, 42-
1703, 42-1735 (Bobbs-Merrill 1977, section
42-1701A (Supp.  1984);
  (6) Director of Department of Water
Resources, Title 42,  Chapter 18,  Idaho
Code, sections  42-1801 through 42-1805
(Bobbs-Merrill 1977);
  (7)  Waste Disposal  and Injection
Wells, Title 42,  Chapter 39, Idaho Code,
sections 42-3901 through 42-3914 (Bobbs-
Merrill  1977), sections 42-3915 through
42-3919 (Supp. 1984);
  (8) Idaho Trade Secrets Act, Title 48,
Chapter 8, Idaho Code, sections  48-801
through 48-807  (Bobbs-Merrill 1977  and
Supp. 1984);
  (9) Administrative  Procedure,  Title
67, Chapter 52, Idaho Code, sections
67-5201 through 67-5218  (Bobbs-Merrill
1980 and Supp. 1984);
  (10) Idaho Radiation Control Regula-
tions (IRCR section 1-9002.70; sections
1-9100 through  1-9110, Department of
Health and Welfare (May 1981);
  (11) Rules and Regulations: Construc-
tion and Use of Injection Wells,  Idaho
Department of  Water Resources,  Rules
1 through 14 (August 1984);
  (12) Rules and Regulations: Practice
and Procedures, Idaho Department of
Water Resources,  Rules 1  through 14
(October 1983).
  (b) The  Memorandum  of  Agreement
between  EPA  and Region  X and  the
Idaho Department of Water Resources
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on February 11, 1985.
  (c) Statement of legal authority. (1) The
Idaho Attorney General's  Statement
for the Underground  Injection Control
Program,  October 31, 1984.
  (2) Letter from David J. Barber, Dep-
uty  Attorney  General,  Idaho Depart-
ment of  Water Resources  to Harold
                                     749

-------
§147.651
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Scott, EPA, Region 10, revising the At-
torney General's Statement, February
14, 1985.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials  submitted as part of
the  application  or  as   supplements
thereto.

[50 FR 23957, June 7. 1985]

§ 147.651  EPA-administered program—
    Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells  on Indian lands in the
State of Idaho is administered  by EPA.
This program consists of the UIC pro-
gram requirements of 40 CPR parts 124,
144, 146, 148, and  any additional require-
ments set  forth in  the  remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
of the UIC  program for Indian  lands in
Idaho is June 11, 1984.

[52 FR 17681, May  11, 1987, as amended at 56
PR 9414, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.652  Aquifer  exemptions.   [Re-
    served]

         Subpart O—Illinois

§ 147.700  State-administered      pro-
    gram—Class  I, III, IV, and V wells.
  The UIC  program for Class I, III, IV
and V wells in  the State of  Illinois,
except those on Indian  lands, is the
program  administered by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency; ap-
proved by EPA pursuant to section 1422
of the SDWA. Notice  of  the  approval
was  published  in the  FEDERAL  REG-
ISTER on February 1,  1984 (49 FR 3991);
the effective date of this program is
March 3,  1984. This program consists of
the following elements, as submitted to
EPA in the  State's program  applica-
tion:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the state  stat-
utes and  regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the  applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Illinois.  This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director  of  the Federal  Register  on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Illinois Environmental Protection
Act, Illinois ch. 111%, sections  1001 to
1051 (Smith-Kurd 1977 Revised Statutes
and Supp. 1983), as amended by Public
Act No. 83-431, 1983 Illinois Legislative
Service, pages 2910 to 2916 (Wesb);
  (2) Illinois Pollution Control  Board
Rules and Regulations at Title 35, Illi-
nois Administrative  Code, Chapter  I,
Part  700, Outline  of  Waste Disposal
Regulations;  Part 702, RCRA and UIC
Permit Programs; Part 704, UIC Permit
Program; Part 705,  Procedures for Per-
mit Issuance  and  Part  730,  Under-
ground Injection Control Operating- Re-
quirements as amended by IPCB Order
No. R-83039 on December 15, 1983.
  (b) The Memorandum  of Agreement
between EPA Region V and the Illinois
Environmental   Protection   Agency,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on March 22, 1984.
  (c) Statement of legal  authority. Letter
from Illinois Attorney General  to  Re-
gional Administrator,  EPA  Region V,
and attached statement,  December 16,
1982.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other  materials submitted as part of
the  application  or   as   supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43087, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.701  State-administered      pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class  II wells in
the State of Illinois,  except those on
Indian lands, is the program adminis-
tered  by the  Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency,  approved by EPA
pursuant to section 1425  of the SDWA.
Notice of the approval was published in
the FEDERAL REGISTER on February  1,
1984 (49 FR 3990); the effective date of
this program is March 3,  1984. This pro-
gram  consists of  the following ele-
ments, as  submitted  to EPA  in  the
state's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State Stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph  are hereby incorporated by  ref-
erence and made  a  part of the applica-
ble  UIC program under the  SDWA for
the State of Illinois.  This  incorpora-
tion by reference was  approved  by the
Director of the  Federal  Register on
June 25, 1984.
                                     750

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §147.750
  (1) Conservation of Oil and Gas, etc.,
Illinois Revised Statutes ch. 96%, sec-
tions 5401 to 5457 (Smith-Hurd  1979 and
Supp. 1983), as amended by Public Act
No.  83-1074  1983  Illinois  Legislative
Service pages 7183 to 7185 (West);
  (2) Illinois Environmental Protection
Act, Illinois Revised Statutes ch. 111%,
sections 1001-1051 (Smith-Hurd  1977 and
Supp. 1983), as amended by Public Act
No.  83-431,  1983  Illinois  Legislative
Services pages 2910 to 2916 (West);
  (3) Illinois Revised Statutes ch. 100V2,
section 26 (Smith-Hurd Supp. 1983);
  (4) Illinois Department of Mines and
Minerals  Regulations for  the  Oil and
Gas  Division, Rules  I,  II, IIA, III,  V,
VII, and IX (1981).
  (b)  The Memorandum of Agreement
between EPA Region V and the Illinois
Department  of Mines  and Minerals,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on March 22, 1984.
  (c) Statement of legal authority. "Cer-
tification of Legal Authority," signed
by State  Attorney,  Richland  County,
Illinois, May 5, 1982.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the  application or  as   supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43087, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.703  EPA-administered program—
   Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC  program for  all
classes  of wells on Indian lands in the
State  of  Illinois  is  administered  by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional  re-
quirements set forth in the remainder
of this  subpart. Injection  well owners
and operators, and EPA  shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates.  The effective date
for the UIC program for Indian lands is
November 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43087, Oct.  25, 1988,  as amended at 56
FR 9414, Mar. 6, 1991]

        Subpart P—Indiana

§ 147.750  State-administered      pro-
   gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program  for Class II  injec-
tion  wells in the State of Indiana  on
non-Indian lands is the program admin-
istered  by the Indiana Department of
Natural Resources (INDR) approved by
the EPA pursuant to section 1425 of the
SDWA.  Notice  of this  approval was
published in the FR on August 19, 1991;
the effective  date  of  this  program is
August  19, 1991. This program consists
of the following elements, as submitted
to EPA  in the State's program applica-
tion:
  (a) Incorpoiation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby  incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State  of  Indiana. This incorpora-
tion by reference was  approved by the
Director of the FR in  accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Cop-
ies may be obtained at the Indiana De-
partment of Natural Resources, Divi-
sion of Oil and Gas,  402  West  Wash-
ington Street, room 293,  Indianapolis,
Indiana, 46204. Copies may be inspected
at the Environmental Protection Agen-
cy, Region V, 77 West Jackson Boule-
vard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604, or at the
National Archives and Records Admin-
istration (NARA). For information  on
the  availability  of this material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go  to: http://
www.archives.gcr/federal	register/
code	of_federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1) Indiana Code, title  4, article 21.5,
chapters 1 through 6 (1988).
  (2) West's Annotated Indiana Code,
title 13, article 8, chapters 1 through 15
(1990 and Cumm. Supp. 1990).
  (3) Indiana Administrative Code, title
310, article 7, rules 1 through 3 (Cumm.
Supp. 1991).
  (b) Memorandum of agreement. The
Memorandum  of  Agreement   between
EPA Region V and the Indiana Depart-
ment of Natural Resources signed  by
the EPA Regional Administrator  on
February 18, 1991.
  (c) Statement of legal  authority. State-
ment and  Amendment to  the State-
ment from the Attorney General of the
State of Indiana, signed on  July 12,
1990, and December  13,  1990, respec-
tively.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted  as part  of
                                     751

-------
§147.751
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
the original application  or  as  supple-
ments thereto.

[56 FR 41072, Aug. 19, 1991, as amended at 62
FR 1834, Jan. 14, 1997]

§ 147.751  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands, and for
Class I, III,  IV, and V wells  on  non-In-
dian lands in the State of Indiana is ad-
ministered by the EPA.  The program
consists of  the UIC program require-
ments of 40  CFR parts 124, 144, 146, and
148 and  the additional requirements set
forth in the remainder of this subpart.
Injection  well owners and  operators,
and EPA  shall comply with these  re-
quirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The  effective date
for the UIC  program on Indian lands is
November 25, 1988. The effective date of
the UIC program for the rest of Indiana
is June  25, 1984.
[53 FR 43087, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9414, Mar. 6, 1991; 56 FR 41072,  Aug.  19,
1991]

§ 147.752  Aquifer    exemptions.   [Re-
   served]

§ 147.753  Existing Class I and III wells
   authorized by rule.
  Maximum   injection  pressure.   The
owner or  operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lessor of:
  (a) A value which will not  exceed the
operating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable; or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:
Pm=(0.800-0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=injection pressure  at the  wellhead in
 pounds per square inch
Sg=specific  gravity  of   injected  fluid
  (uuitless)
d=injection depth in  feet.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 56
FR 41072, Aug. 19, 1991]

          Subpart Q—Iowa

§ 147.800  State-administered program.
   [Reserved]

§ 147.801  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC progiam for the
State  of Iowa,  including  all  Indian
lands, is  administered by EPA. This
program consists of the UIC  program
requirements of 40 CPR parts 124, 144,
146,  148, and  any additional  require-
ments set forth in the  remainder  of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and  EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
for the UIC  program for all  lands  in
Iowa, including Indian lands, is June
25, 1984.
[52 FR 17681, May 11, 1987, as amended at 56
FR 9415, Mar. 6, 1991]

§147.802  Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
    served]

         Subpart R—Kansas

§ 147.850  State-administered      pro-
    gram—Class I, III, IV and V wells.
  The UIC program for Class I, III, IV
and V wells in  the State of Kansas, ex-
cept those on Indian lands as described
in  §147.860, is  the program adminis-
tered by the  Kansas  Department  of
Health and Environment, approved by
EPA  pursuant  to  section  1422 of the
SDWA.  Notice  of this approval  was
published in the  FEDERAL REGISTER on
December 2, 1983 (48 FR 54350); the ef-
fective date of this program is Decem-
ber 2, 1983. This program consists of the
following elements,  as submitted  to
EPA  in  the  State's program applica-
tion.
  (a) Incorporation  by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Kansas. This incorporation
by  reference  was  approved  by  the
Director of the OFR in accordance with
5 U.S.C.  552(a)  and 1 CFR part 51. Cop-
ies may be obtained at the Kansas De-
partment of  Health and Environment,
Forbes  Field,  Building  740,  Topeka,
Kansas, 66620. Copies may be inspected
at the Environmental Protection Agen-
cy, Region VII, 726 Minnesota Avenue,
Kansas City, Kansas, 66101, or at the
National Archives  and Records Admin-
istration  (NARA).  For information on
the  availability  of  this  material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
                                     752

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §147.901
code	of_Jederal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1)  Chapter  28,  Article  46,  Under-
ground  Injection Control Regulations,
Kansas   Administrative   Regulations
§§28-46-1  through  28-46-42  (1986  and
Supp. 1987);
  (2) Chapter  28, Article  43, Construc-
tion,  operation, monitoring and aban-
donment of  salt solution mining wells,
Kansas   Administrative   Regulations
§§28-43-1 through 28-43-10 (1986);
  (3) Kansas Statutes Annotated §§65-
161, 65-164 through 65-166a, 65-171d (1980
and Cumm. Supp. 1989).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations, although not  incor-
porated by reference  except for the se-
lect sections identified in paragraph (a)
of this section, are also part of the ap-
proved   State-administered  program:
Kansas   Statutes  Annotated  §§65-161
through 65-171(w), (1980 and Supp. 1983).
  (c) Memorandum of Agreement. (1)  The
Memorandum   of Agreement between
EPA Region VII and the Kansas  De-
partment of Health and Environment,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on July 29, 1983;
  (2) Addendum No.  1 of  the  Memo-
randum  of Agreement, signed by  the
EPA  Regional Administrator on  Au-
gust 29, 1983.
  (d)  Statement  of  legal authority. (1)
"Statement   of  Attorney   General",
signed by the  Attorney General  of the
State of Kansas, November 25, 1981;
  (2) "Supplemental Statement of  At-
torney General", signed by the Attor-
ney General of the State of Kansas, un-
dated (one page).
  (e) Program description. The program
description  and  any  other materials
submitted as part of the application or
supplements thereto.
[49 FR 45306, Nov. 15, 1984, as amended at 56
FR 9415, Mar. 6, 1991]

 147.851 State-administered      pro-
   gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
;he State of Kansas,  except those on
 ndian lands as described in §147.860, is
;he program administered  by the Kan-
sas  Corporation Commission and  the
Kansas  Department of Health and  En-
vironment, approved  by EPA pursuant
,o section 1425 of the SDWA. Notice of
this approval was published in the FED-
ERAL  REGISTER on February 8, 1984 (49
FR 4735); the effective date of this pro-
gram is February 8, 1984. This program
consists of the following elements, as
submitted to EPA in the  State's pro-
gram application.

[49 FR 45306, Nov. 15, 1984]

§§ 147.852-147.859  [Reserved]

§147.860  EPA-administered program—
    Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian  lands in the
State  of  Kansas  is  administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth  in the  remainder
of this subpart. Injection  well owners
and operators,  and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The  effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Kansas is December 30, 1984.

[49 FR 45307, Nov. 15, 1984, as amended at ,56
FR 9415, Mar. 6, 1991]

       Subpart S—Kentucky

§ 147.900  State-administered program.
    [Reserved]

§ 147.901  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, including
all Indian lands,  is  administered by
EPA.  This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth  in the remainder
of this subpart. Injection  well owners
and operators,  and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
for the UIC program on Indian lands is
November 25,  1988.  The  effective date
for the UIC  program  in the remainder
of Kentucky is June 25, 1984.

[53 FR 43087, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9415, Mar. 6, 1991]
                                    753

-------
§147.902
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§147.902  Aquifer   exemptions.    [Re-
    served]

§147.903  Existing  Class  I, II (except
    enhanced   recovery  and  hydro-
    carbon storage) and  III wells au-
    thorized by rule.
  Maximum   injection  pressure.   The
owner or operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable or;
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:

Pm=(0.733-0.433 Sg)ct
where:
Pm=injection pressure at  the well head  in
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific gravity of inject fluid (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.

§147.904  Existing  Class  II  enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage
    wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure.  (1) To
meet  the  operating requirements  of
§144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap-
ter, the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall use an injection pressure no
greater than  the pressure established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well  is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall establish such  a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment,  and  opportunity  for  a  public
hearing, according to the provisions  of
part 124, subpart A of this chapter, and
will inform owners  and operators  in
writing of  the  applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (ii) May inject  at pressures greater
than   those   specified   in   paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section  for the field  or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits a request in writing
to  the Regional Administrator,  and
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Regional  Administrator that such in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement of  §144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A)  and
(B).  The Regional  Administrator may
grant such a request after notice, op-
portunity  for  comment, and  oppor-
tunity for a public hearing, according
to the provisions of part 124, subpart A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the Regional
Administrator  establishes  rules   for
maximum injection pressure based on
data  provided pursuant  to  paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of  this section  the  owner or
operator shall:
  (i)  Limit  injection  pressure to  a
value which will not exceed  the oper-
ating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii) Submit data  acceptable  to  the
Regional Administrator which  defines
the fracture pressure of the formation
in which injection is taking place. A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two  or more operators conducting
operations in the  same  formation,  if
the  Regional Administrator approves
such submission. The data shall be sub-
mitted  to the Regional Administrator
within  1 year of the effective date of
this program.
  (b)  Casing and Cementing. Where the
Regional  Administrator  determines
that the owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced recovery  or hydrocarbon
storage well may not be in compliance
with the requirements of §§144.28(e) and
146.22, the owner or operator shall com-
ply with paragraphs (b) (1) through (4)
of this  section, when required  by the
Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface casing by recir-
culating the cement  to the  surface
from a  point 50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all USDWs by placing
cement between the outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2)  Isolate  any  injection  zones  by
placing sufficient  cement to fill  the
calculated space between and the cas-
ing the well  bore  to a point 250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and qualitj
to withstand the  maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant  to  deteriora
tion  from  formation  and  injectior
fluids; and
  (ill) In a quantity no less  than 120°X
of the calculated volume necessary tc
cement off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator ma:
specify  other requirements in additioi
to or in lieu of the requirements  se
forth in paragraphs (b) (1) through (3
                                     754

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §147.950
of this section, as needed  to protect
USDWs.

§147.905 Requirements for all wells-
   area of review.
  Notwithstanding   the  alternatives
presented in § 146.6 of this chapter, the
area of  review shall  be a  minimum
fixed radius as  described in §146.6(b) of
this chapter.

        Subpart T—Louisiana

§ 147.950 State-administered program.
  The UIC program for Class  I, II, III,
IV, and V  wells in the  State of  Lou-
isiana,  except  those  wells  on  Indian
lands,  is the program  administered by
the Louisiana  Department  of Natural
Resources approved  by EPA  pursuant
to sections 1422 and 1425 of the SDWA.
Notice of this  approval  was published
in the  FEDERAL REGISTER on April 23,
1982 (47 PR 17487); the  effective date of
this  program is March  23, 1982.  This
program consists of the following ele-
ments,  as  submitted  to EPA in the
State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by  reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the  State  stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph  are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Louisiana. This incorpora-
tion by reference was  approved by the
Director of the Federal Register on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Louisiana Revised Statutes Anno-
tated sections 30:1-30:24 (1975 and Supp.
1982);
  (2) Underground  Injection  Control
Program Regulations  for Class I, III,
IV, and V  wells, Statewide Order No.
29-N-l  (February 20, 1982), as amended
June 1, 1985 and January 20, 1986;
  (3)(i) Statewide Order Governing the
Drilling  for and Producing  of Oil and
Gas  in the State of Louisiana, State-
wide Order No. 29-B  (August 26,  1974)
(Composite     Order     Incorporating
Amendments through March 1, 1974);
  (ii) Amendments to  Statewide Order
\fo. 29-B (Off-site Disposal  of Drilling
Vlud and Salt  Water  Generated  from
Drilling and Production of Oil and Gas
tfells)  (effective July 20, 1980);
  (iii) Amendment to  Statewide Order
^o. 29-B (Amendment concerning the
use of Tables 5A and 6A, etc.) (Decem-
ber 15, 1980, effective January 1, 1981);
  (iv) Amendment to Statewide  Order
No. 29-B (Amendment concerning  the
underground injection control  of salt-
water disposal wells, enhanced recov-
ery injection wells,  and liquid hydro-
carbon  storage  wells) (effective Feb-
ruary 20, 1982);
  (v)  Amendment  to Statewide  Order
No. 29-B (Amendment concerning  the
offsite  disposal of  drilling  mud  and
saltwater) (effective  May 20, 1983);
  (vi) Amendment to Statewide  Order
No. 29-B (Amendment concerning  dis-
posal of nonhazardous  oilfield waste)
(March  20, 1984, effective May 20, 1984);
  (vii) Amendment to Statewide  Order
No. 29-B (Amendment concerning  the
administrative approval  of injectivity
tests and pilot projects in  order to de-
termine the feasibility of proposed en-
hanced  recovery  projects) (June  20,
1985, effective July 1, 1985).
  (4) (i)  Statewide Order adopting rules
and regulations pertaining to  the  use
of  salt  dome  cavities  (i.e.,  storage
chambers) for storage of liquid and/or
gaseous hydrocarbons, etc., Statewide
Order No. 29-M (July 6, 1977,  effective
July 20, 1977);
  (ii)  Supplement  to Statewide  Order
No. 29-M (October 2,  1978);
  (iii) Second Supplement to Statewide
Order No. 29-M (June 8, 1979).
  (b)(l)  The Memorandum of Agree-
ment (Class I, III,  IV, and  V wells) be-
tween EPA Region  VI and the Lou-
isiana  Department   of  Natural  Re-
sources, Office  of Conservation, signed
by the EPA Regional Administrator on
March 17, 1982 and amended by Adden-
dum 1 and Addendum 2 on  November 3,
1989;
  (2) The Memorandum of Agreement
(Class II wells) between EPA Region VI
and the Louisiana Department of Nat-
ural Resources, Office of Conservation,
signed by the EPA  Regional Adminis-
trator on March 17, 1982.
  (c)  Statement of legal  authority.  (1)
Letter from Attorney General  of Lou-
isiana to EPA, "Re: Louisiana Under-
ground  Injection Control Program  Au-
thorization  for State  of  Louisiana"
(Class I, III, IV and  V Wells), January
13,1982,  (10 pages);
                                    755

-------
§147.951
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (2) Letter from  Attorney General of
Louisiana to EPA, "Re: Louisiana Un-
derground  Injection  Control  Program
Authorization for State of Louisiana"
(Class  II  Wells),  January  13, 1982 (5
pages).
  (3) Letter from  Attorney General of
Louisiana  to  EPA,  "Be:  Class  I Haz-
ardous  Waste Injection   Well   Regu-
latory  Program;  Attorney General's
Statement, October 9, 1989 (9 pages);
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the  application   or  as  supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 56
FR 9415, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.951 EPA-administered program—
    Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes  of wells on Indian lands in the
State of Louisiana is administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth in the remainder
of this  subpart. Injection  well owners
and  operators, and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective  dates. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Louisiana is November 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43087, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9415, Mar. 6, 1991]

         Subpart U—Maine

§ 147.1000 State-administered     pro-
    gram.
  The UIC program for  all classes of
wells in the  State of Maine,  except
those on Indian lands, is the program
administered by the Maine Department
of Environmental Protection approved
by EPA pursuant to section 1422  of the
SDWA.  Notice  of  this  approval  was
published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on
August  25,  1983 (48 FR 38641); the effec-
tive date of this program is September
26,  1983. This  program consists of the
following  elements,  as  submitted to
EPA in the State's  program applica-
tion.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby  incorporated by ref-
erence and made part of the applicable
UIC  program under the  SDWA for the
State of Maine. This incorporation by
reference was approved by the Director
of the OFR on June 25, 1984.
  (1)  Maine  Revised  Statutes  Anno-
tated title 38, sections 361-A, 363-B, 413,
414, 414-A, 420, and 1317-A (1978);
  (2) Rules to  Control the  Subsurface
Discharge of Pollutants  by  Well Injec-
tion, Rules of the Department of Envi-
ronmental   Protection,   Chapter  543
(adopted June 22, 1983, effective July 4.
1983).
  (b) The Memorandum  of  Agreement
between EPA Region I and the Maine
Department of Environmental Protec-
tion, signed by the EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator on  May 16, 1983.
  (c) Statement  of legal authority. Letter
from Attorney General  of Maine to
EPA Regional  Administrator, "Re: At-
torney General's Statement: Maine Un-
derground  Injection  Control Program
Primacy Application," June  30, 1983.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted  as  part of
the  application  or as supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11,  1984, as amended at 53
FR 43088, Oct. 25, 1988: 56 FR  9415, Mar 6,
1991]

§ 147.1001 EPA-administered       pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The  UIC program for all
classes  of wells on Indian lands in the
State of Maine  is administered by EPA.
This program consists of the UIC  pro-
gram requirements of 40  CFR parts 124,
144, 146, 148, and any additional require-
ments set  forth in the  remainder of
this  subpart. Injection well  owners anc
operators and  EPA shall comply  with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
of the UIC  program for Indian lands in
Maine is November 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43088, Oct. 25,  1988, as amended at 5f
FR 9416,  Mar 6. 1991]

       Subpart V—Maryland

§ 147.1050 State-administered      pro
   gram—Class I, II, III,  IV, and 'X
   wells.
  The UIC  program for Class 1, II, III
IV,  and V wells in the State of Mary
land, except  those  wells  on  India]
                                     756

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1100
lands, is the program administered by
the Maryland Department of the Envi-
ronment approved by EPA pursuant to
section  1422  of the SDWA.  Notice of
this approval was published  in the FR
on April 19, 1984 (49 FR 15553); the effec-
tive date of this program is  June 4,
1984. This program consists  of the fol-
lowing elements, as submitted to EPA
in the State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble  UIC program under the  SDWA  for
the State of  Maryland. This  incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the OFR in accordance with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Cop-
ies  may be obtained at the Maryland
Department  of  the Environment,  2500
Broening  Highway, Baltimore, Mary-
land, 21224. Copies may be inspected at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 841 Chestnut Street, Phila-
delphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, or at the
National Archives and Records Admin-
istration (NARA).  For information on
the  availability of this  material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of_federal	regulations/
ibr	locations, html.
  (1) Code of  Maryland Regulations,
Title 26, Subtitle  08,  Chapter 07 pro-
mulgated and effective as of March 1,
1989;
  (2) Code of  Maryland Regulations,
Title 26, Subtitle 08,  Chapter  01, pro-
mulgated and effective as of March 1,
1989;
  (3) Code of  Maryland Regulations,
Title 26, Subtitle 08,  Chapter  02, pro-
mulgated and effective as of March 1,
1989;
  (4) Code of  Maryland Regulations.
Title 26, Subtitle 08,  Chapter  03, pro-
mulgated and effective as of March 1,
1989;
  (5) Code of  Maryland Regulations,
Title 26, Subtitle 08,  Chapter  04, pro-
mulgated and effective as of March 1,
1989;
  (6) Code of  Maryland Regulations,
Title 26, Subtitle 13, Chapter  05, section
.19,  promulgated and effective as of Au-
gust 1, 1989;
  (7)  Code  of  Maryland Regulations,
Title 26, Subtitle 01, Chapter 02, pro-
mulgated and effective as of March 1,
1989;
  (8)  Code  of  Maryland Regulations,
Title 26, Subtitle 01, Chapter 04, pro-
mulgated and effective as of March 1,
1989.
  (b)  Memorandum of Agreement. The
Memorandum of  Agreement  between
EPA Region III and the Maryland De-
partment of the  Environment, as sub-
mitted  on August 2, 1983, and revised
on February 16, 1984.
  (c) Statement of legal authority. State-
ment from  the  Maryland  Attorney
General on the Underground Injection
Control Program, as submitted on Au-
gust 2, 1983, and revised on February 16,
1984.
  (d) Program Description. The Program
Description and  other  materials sub-
mitted as part of the application or as
supplements thereto.
[56 FR 9416, Mar. 6, 1991]

§§ 147.1051-147.1052  [Reserved]

§ 147.1053  EPA-administered     pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC  program for all
classes  of wells on Indian lands in the
State of Maryland is administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth in the remainder
of this  subpart. Injection well owners
and operators, and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Maryland is November 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43088, Oct. 25, 1988,  as amended at 56
FR 9416, Mar. 6, 1991]

§§ 147.1054-147.1099  [Reserved]

    Subpart W—Massachusetts

§ 147.1100  State-administered     pro-
    gram.
  The UIC  program for all classes  of
wells in the State of Massachusetts, ex-
cept those on Indian lands, is the pro-
gram administered by  the  Massachu-
setts Department of  Environmental
Protection, approved by EPA pursuant
to section  1422 of the SDWA. Notice  of
                                     757

-------
§147.1101
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
this approval was published in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER on November 23, 1982 (47
FR 52705); the effective date of this pro-
gram is December 23,  1982. This pro-
gram consists  of the following'  ele-
ments,  as submitted  to  EPA  in the
State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby  incorporated  by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program  under the SDWA  for
the State of Massachusetts. This incor-
poration by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal  Register on
June 25. 1984.
  (1) Massachusetts General Laws An-
notated chapter 21, sections 27, 43, and
44 (West 1981);
  (2) Code of  Massachusetts  Regula-
tions, title 310, sections  23.01-23.11 as
amended April 26,  1982.
  (b) The Memorandum of Agreement
between EPA Region I and the Massa-
chusetts Department of Environmental
Quality  Engineering,  signed  by  the
EPA Regional Administrator on  Au-
gust 18, 1982.
  (c) Statement of  legal authority. "Un-
derground Injection Control Program—
Attorney   General's   Statement   for
Class I, II,  III,  IV  and V Injection
Wells,"  signed  by  Assistant Attorney
General for Attorney General of Massa-
chusetts, May 13, 1982.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.
[49 PR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43088, Oct  25. 1988]

§ 147.1101 EPA-administered     pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program  for all
classes of wells on Indian lands  in the
State of Massachusetts is administered
by EPA. This program consists  of the
UIC program  requirements  of 40 CPR
parts 124, 144,  146, 148, and any addi-
tional requirements set forth in the re-
mainder of this subpart. Injection well
owners  and operators,  and EPA shall
comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Massachusetts is November 25, 1988.
[53 PR 43088, Oct.  25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9416, Mar. 6, 1991]
       Subpart X—Michigan

§ 147.1150  State-administered
    gram. [Reserved]
pro-
§ 147.1151 EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
State of Michigan, including all Indian
lands,  is administered by  EPA.  This
program consists of  the  UIC program
requirements  of 40 CFR parts 124, 144,
146,  148. and  any  additional  require-
ments  set forth in the  remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective  dates.  The effective date
for the UIC program for all lands in
Michigan,  including  Indian  lands, is
June 25, 1984.
[52 PR 17681,  May 11, 1987, as amended at 56
FR 9416, Mar. 6,  1991]

§ 147.1152 Aquifer   exemptions.  [Re-
    served]

§147.1153 Existing Class I, II (except
    enhanced   recovery  and  hydro-
    carbon  storage)  and  III wells au-
    thorized by rule.
  Maximum   injection  pressure.  The
owner or operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating requirements of  §144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as  applicable: or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:
Pm=(0.800- 0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=injection pressure at the  well head in
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific   gravity  of   injected  fluic
  (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.

§147.1154 Existing Class II enhancec
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage
    wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure. (I) Tc
meet the  operating requirements o
§144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap
ter, the owner or operator:
                                     758

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1201
  (i) Shall use an Injection pressure no
greater than  the pressure established
by  the Regional  Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall establish such a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment,  and opportunity  for  a  public
hearing, according to the provisions of
part 124, subpart  A of this chapter, and
will inform  owners and operators  in
writing  of the  applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (ii) May inject at pressures  greater
than  those   specified  in  paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for  the field  or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits a request in writing
to  the  Regional Administrator,  and
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Regonal Administrator that such injec-
tion pressure will not violate  the  re-
quirement of §144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A)  and
(B). The Regional Administrator may
grant such a  request after notice, op-
portunity  for comment,  and  oppor-
tunity for a public hearing, according
to the provisions of part 124, subpart A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the Regional
Administrator establishes  field  rules
for maximum injection pressure based
on  data provided  pursuant  to para-
graph  (a)(2)(ii)   of  this  section  the
owner or operator shall:
  (i) Limit  injection  pressure to  a
value which will not exceed the oper-
ating requirements  of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii)  Submit data acceptable  to the
Regional Administrator which  defines
the fracture pressure of the formation
in which  injection is  taking place.  A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two  or  more  operators  conducting
operations in the same formation,  if
the Regional  Administrator  approves
such submission.  The data shall be sub-
mitted to the Regional  Administrator
within 1 year following the  effective
date of this program.
  (b) Casing and  cementing. Where the
Regional   Administrator   determines
that the owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced  recovery or hydrocarbon
storage  will may not be in  compliance
with the requirements of §§144.28(e) and
146.22, the owner or operator shall com-
ply with paragraphs (b) (1)  through (4)
of this section, when required by the
regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface casing by recir-
culating the  cement to  the  surface
from a point  50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all USDWs by  placing
cement between the  outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2)  Isolate  any  injection zones  by
placing sufficient  cement  to  fill the
calculated space  between  the casing
and  the well  bore  to a  point 250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and  quality
to withstand  the  maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant to deteriora-
tion  from  formation  and  injection
fluids; and
  (ill) In a quantity no less than  120%
of the calculated volume necessary to
cement off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator may
specify other requirements in addition
to or in lieu  of the  requirements set
forth in paragraphs (b) (1)  through  (3)
of this section, as needed to protect
USDWs.

§ 147.1155  Requirements for all wells.
  (a)  Area  of  review.  Notwithstanding
the alternatives presented in §146.6 of
this  chapter,  the  area  of review for
Class II wells shall be a fixed radius as
described in § 146.6(0) of this chapter.
  (b)  Tubing and packer.  The owner or
operator of an injection well injecting
salt  water  for disposal shall inject
through tubing and packer. The owner
of an existing  well must comply  with
this requirement within one year of the
effective date of this program.
       Subpart Y—Minnesota

§ 147.1200 State-administered
    gram. [Reserved]
pro-
§ 147.1201  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
State of Minnesota is administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CPR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth in the remainder
of this  subpart. Injection well  owners
                                     759
      203-160  D-25

-------
§147.1202
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
and operators, and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (To) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Minnesota is:
June 11, 1984.
[49 PR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 56
FR 9416, Mar. 6, 1991]

§147.1202 Aquifer   exemptions.  [Re-
   served]

§147.1210 Requirements   for   Indian
   lands.
  (a)  Purpose and scope.  This section
sets forth additional requirements that
apply to injection activities on Indian
lands in Minnesota.
  (b)   Requirements.   Notwithstanding
the other requirements of this subpart,
for Indian lands described in paragraph
(a) of this section, no  owner or oper-
ator  shall construct,  operate,  main-
tain, or convert any Class I, II, III, or
IV well.  The UIC program for Class V
wells on such Indian Lands is adminis-
tered by EPA, and consists of the appli-
cable requirements of 40 CFR parts 124,
144, and  146.  In addition, no owner or
operator shall abandon a well  without
the approval of the Regional Adminis-
trator.
  (c) Effective date. The effective date of
the UIC  program requirements for  In-
dian lands in Minnesota is December
30, 1984.
[49 FR 45307, Nov. 15, 1984]

       Subpart Z—Mississippi

§ 147.1250  State-administered     pro-
   gram—Class I, III, IV, and V wells.
  The UIC program for Class I, III, IV
and V wells in the State of Mississippi,
except those on Indian lands, is the
program  administered  by  the  Mis-
sissippi  Department of  Natural  Re-
sources approved by EPA pursuant to
section 1422  of the  SDWA. Notice of
this approval was published in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER  on  August 25,  1983  (48
FR 38641); the effective date of this pro-
gram is  September 26, 1983. This pro-
gram  consists  of  the following  ele-
ments,  as submitted  to EPA  in the
State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Mississippi. This incorpo-
ration by  reference was  approved by
the Director of the Federal Register on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Mississippi Air and  Water Pollu-
tion Control Law, Mississippi Code An-
notated sections 49-17-1 through 49-17-
29 (1972) and Supp. 1983);
  (2) Mississippi Department of Natural
Resources, Bureau of Pollution  Con-
trol,  Underground Injection  Control
Program  Regulations  (adopted  Feb-
ruary 11, 1982);
  (3) Mississippi Department of Natural
Resources, Bureau of Pollution  Con-
trol,  State of  Mississippi Waste water
Permit Regulations for National  Pol-
lutant Discharge  Elimination  System
(NPDES), Underground Injection  Con-
trol (UIC),  and State Operating  Per-
mits  (adopted  May 1, 1974; amended
February 11, 1982).
  (b)  The Memorandum  of Agreement
between EPA  Region IV  and the  Mis-
sissippi  Department  of  Natural  Re-
sources,  signed by the EPA Regional
Administrator on February 8, 1983.
  (c)  Statement  of legal authority. (1)
Letter from Attorney General of Mis-
sissippi (by Special Assistant Attorney
General) to Executive Director,  Mis-
sissippi  Department  of  Natural  Re-
sources, "Re: Mississippi Department of
Natural Resources, Bureau of Pollution
Control, State Underground Injection
Control (UIC) Program; Statement of
the Attorney  General of the  State of
Mississippi," December 3,1981;
  (2) Letter from  Attorney General of
Mississippi (by Special  Assistant At-
torney General) to Executive Director,
Mississippi Department of Natural Re-
sources,  "Re:  Authority  to Regulate
and Take  Samples from  Underground
Injection Systems," October 18, 1982;
  (3) Letter from  Attorney General of
Mississippi (by Special  Assistant At-
torney General) to Regional Adminis-
trator,  EPA Region IV,  "Re:  Public
Participation   in  State  Enforcement
Actions, UIC Program," June 10, 1983.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as  part of
the application or supplements thereto.

[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43088, Oct. 25, 1988]
                                     760

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1300
§ 147.1251  State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the  State  of Mississippi, other  than
those on Indian lands,  is the program
administered by the State Oil and G-as
Board of Mississippi approved by EPA
pursuant to section 1425 of the SDWA.
Notice of this  approval was published
in the FEDERAL REGISTER on March 2,
1989; the effective  date of this program
is March 2, 1989. This program consists
of the following elements, as submitted
to EPA in the State's program applica-
tion:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The
requirements  set  forth in  the  State
statutes  and regulations cited in this
paragraph  are  hereby  incorporated by
reference and made a part of the  appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Mississippi. This incorpo-
ration by  reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
  (1) Mississippi Code Annotated, sec-
tion 5-9-9 (Supp. 1988).
  (2) Mississippi Code Annotated, sec-
tions 53-1-1 through  53-1-47, inclusive
and sections 53-1-71 through 53-1-77, in-
clusive (1972 and Supp. 1988).
  (3) Mississippi Code Annotated, sec-
tions 53-3-1 through 53-3-165, inclusive
(1972 and Supp.  1988).
  (4) State  Oil  and Gas Board State-
wide Rules and Regulations, Rules  1
through  65, inclusive (Aug.  1,  1987,  as
amended, Sept. 17, 1987).
  (b) The Memorandum of Agreement
between  EPA Region IV and the  State
Oil and Gas Board of Mississippi signed
by the Regional Administrator on Oc-
tober 31,  1988.
  (c)  Statement  of  legal  authority.
Statement from the Attorney General
signed on October 1, 1987 with amend-
ments to the Statement signed August
5, 1988 and  September  15, 1988 by the
Special Assistant Attorney General.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as  part  of
the original  application or as supple-
ments thereto.

[54 FR 8735, Mar. 2, 1989]
§ 147.1252 EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State of Mississippi is administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146. 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth in the remainder
of this  subpart. Injection well owners
and  operators, and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The  effective date
of the UIC program  on Indian lands is
November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 8735, Mar. 2, 1989, as amended at 56 FR
9416, Mar. 6. 1991]

       Subpart AA—Missouri

§ 147.1300 State-administered     pro-
    gram.
  The UIC program for  all classes of
wells in  the  State of Missouri, except
those on Indian lands, is administered
by the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources, approved by EPA  pursuant
to section 1422 and 1425  of the SDWA.
Notice of this approval  was published
in the FEDERAL REGISTER on December
2, 1983 (48 FR 54349); the effective date
of this  program  is December  2, 1983).
This program consists of the following
elements, as submitted to  EPA in the
State's program application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made  a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Missouri. This incorpora-
tion by  reference was approved by the
Director of  the  Federal Register on
June 25. 1984.
  (1)  Vernon's  Annotated   Missouri
Statutes  sections  259.010  to  259.240
(Supp. 1984);
  (2) Missouri  Code of State  Regula-
tions, title  10, division 50.  chapters  1
and 2 (June 1984);
  (3)  Vernon's  Annotated   Missouri
Statutes chapter 204, §§204.006 through
204.470 (1983 and Cumm. Supp. 1990).
  (b) The Memorandum  of Agreement
between EPA Region VII and the Mis-
souri Department   of  Oil  and  Gas,
                                    761

-------
§147.1301
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on December 3, 1982.
  (c)  Statement  of legal authority.  (1)
Opinion  Letter No.  63 and attached
Memorandum Opinion, signed by At-
torney General  of Missouri, March 16,
1982;
  (2) Addendum to Opinion Letter No.
63 (1982), signed by Attorney General of
Missouri, October  28, 1982.
  (3) Opinion No.  127-83, signed by At-
torney  General of Missouri, July  11,
1983.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the  application  or   as   supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43088, Oct. 25, 1988;  56 FR 9416, Mar. 6,
1991]

§ 147.1301 State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class I,  III, IV, and V wells.
  The UIC program for Class I, III, IV,
and V wells  in  the State  of Missouri,
other than those on Indian lands, is the
program administered by the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources, ap-
proved by EPA pursuant to section 1422
of the SOW A. Notice of this approval
was published in the FEDERAL  REG-
ISTER on November 2, 1984;  the effective
date  of this  program is July  31, 1985.
This program consists of the following
elements, as submitted to EPA in the
State's program application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited  in this para-
graph are hereby  incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC  program  under the SDWA  for
the State of Missouri.  This incorpora-
tion by reference  was approved by the
Director of the  Federal Register effec-
tive July 31, 1985.
  (1) Revised Statutes  of the State of
Missouri, Volume 2,  sections 204.016,
204.026,  204.051, 204.056 and Volume V,
section 577.155 (1978 and Cumm.  Supp.
1984);
  (2)  Missouri  Code  of State Regula-
tions, title  10, division 20,  Chapter 6,
sections 20-6.010,  20-6.020,  20-6.070,  20-
6.080, 20-6.090, and title 10, division 20,
Chapter 7, section  20-7.031 (1977, amend-
ed 1984).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations,  although not  incor-
porated by reference except for select
sections identified in paragraph (a) of
this section, are also part of the ap-
proved State-administered program.
  (1) Revised Statutes of the State of
Missouri, chapters 204, 260, 536,  557, 558
and 560; sections 640.130.1 and 1.020 (1978
and Cumm. Supp. 1984);
  (2)  Rule  52.12 Vernon's  Annotated
Missouri Rules (1978);
  (3)  Missouri Code of State  Regula-
tions, title  10, division 20,  Chapters 1
through 7 (1977, amended 1984).
  (c)  The  Memorandum of  Agreement
between EPA Region VII and the Mis-
souri  Department  of  Natural  Re-
sources, signed  by the EPA  Regional
Administrator on October 10, 1984.
  (d) Statement of Legal Authority. Opin-
ion No. 123-84, signed by Attorney Gen-
eral of Missouri, September 24, 1984.
Amended April 2, 1985.
  (e) The Program Description amd any
other materials  submitted  as  part of
the  application   or  as  supplements
thereto.
[50 FR 28942, July 17, 1985]

§ 147.1302  Aquifer   exemptions.
    served]
[Re-
§ 147.1303  EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State of Missouri is  administered by
EPA. This  program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 145, 146, 148, and any additional
requirements set forth in the remain-
der of this  subpart. Injection well own-
ers and operators, and EPA shall com-
ply with these requirements.
  (b)  Effective date. The effective date
for the UIC program for Indian lands is
November 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43088, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9417, Mar. 6, 1991]

       Subpart BB—Montana

§ 147.1350  State-administered     pro-
    grams—Class II wells.
  The UIC  program for Class II injec-
tion wells in the State of Montana,  ex-
cept for those in Indian Country, is the
program administered by the Montana
Board of  Oil  and  Gas  Conservation
                                     762

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1352
(MBOGC) approved by the EPA pursu-
ant to Section 1425 of the SDWA. No-
tice  of this approval was published in
the FEDERAL REGISTER on November 19,
1996; the effective date of this program
is November 19, 1996. This program con-
sists of the following elements as sub-
mitted to EPA in the State's program
application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made part of the applicable
UIO  program under the  SDWA for the
State of Montana. This incorporation
by reference was approved by the Di-
rector of the FR in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies
may be obtained at the Montana Board
of Oil and  Gas  Conservation, 2535 St.
Johns  Avenue.   Billings,   Montana,
59102. Copies may be inspected at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Re-
gion VIII,  999  18th Street,  Suite 500,
Denver, Colorado, 80202-2466, or at the
National Archives and Records Admin-
istration (NARA). For information on
the  availability of this material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of_federal	regulations/
ibr	locations .html.
  (1) Montana Statutory Requirements
Applicable to the  Underground  Injec-
tion Control Program, August, 1996.
  (2)  Montana   Regulatory  Require-
ments Applicable to the Underground
Injection Control Program,  August,
1996.
  (b) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA).
(1) The MOA between EPA Region VIII
and the  MBOGC signed  by the  Acting
EPA Regional Administrator on  June
9, 1996.
  (2) Letter dated May  24, 1996,  from
the Administrator of the MBOGC and
the attached addendum (Addendum No.
1-96) to the MOA between MBOGC and
EPA Region VIII, signed by the Acting
EPA  Regional  Administrator  on Au-
gust 14, 1996.
  (c)  Statement  of legal authority.  (1)
Letter from the  Montana Attorney
General to the Regional  Administrator
dated August 1, 1995.
  (2) MBOGC independent counsel's cer-
tification of Montana's UIC program
for Class II wells dated July 24, 1995.
  (3) Letter dated  March 8,1996,  from
MBOGC   independent   counsel   to
USEPA,  Region VIII; "Re: EPA  com-
ments of November 29,  1995, on Mon-
tana Class II primacy application."
  (4) Letter dated March 8,  1996,  from
the Administrator  of the MBOGC and
the attached proposed replacement lan-
guage for the MOA; "Re: Responses to
EPA  comments on Montana Class II
Primacy Application."
  (d) Program Description. The Program
Description and  any  other  materials
submitted as part of the application or
as supplemented thereto:
  (1)  Application   and  accompanying
materials for  approval  of Montana's
UIC program for  Class II wells  sub-
mitted by the Governor of Montana,
August 3, 1995.
  (2) [Reserved]

[61 FR 58933, Nov. 19, 1996]

§ 147.1351 EPA-administered program.

  (a) Contents. The UIC program in the
State of Montana for Class  I, III, IV,
and V wells, and for all Classes of wells
in Indian Country  is administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements  set forth in  the  remainder
of this subpart. Injection well owners
and operators, and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
for the UIC program on all lands in
Montana, including all Indian lands, is
June 25, 1984.

[52 FR 17681, May 11, 1987, as amended at 56
FR 9417. Mar. 6, 1991; 61 FR 58933, Nov. 19,
1996]

§ 147.1352 Aquifer exemptions.

  Those  portions  of  aquifers  within
one-quarter mile of  existing Class II
wells are exempted for the purpose of
Class II injection activities only.
 NOTE: A complete listing of the exemptions
and their  location is available for review in
the EPA Regional Office, 1860 Lincoln Street,
Denver, Colorado. An updated list of exemp-
tions will be  maintained in the Regional
Office.
                                     763

-------
§147.1353
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§147.1353 Existing Class I,  II (except
    enhanced   recovery  and   hydro-
    carbon storage)  and  III wells au-
    thorized by rule.
  Maximum   injection   pressure.   The
owner or operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating requirements of § 144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:

Pm=(0.733 - 0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=lnjection pressure at  the well head in
  pounds per square inch
Sg=speolfic gravity of inject fluid (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure. (1) To
meet  the  operating requirements of
§ 144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap-
ter, the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall use an injection pressure no
greater than  the  pressure  established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall  establish such a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment,  and  opportunity for  a public
hearing, according to the provisions of
part 124, subpart A of this chapter,  and
will inform owners and operators in
writing  of  the  applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (ii)  May  inject  at  pressures greater
than   those   specified  in   paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for the field or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits  a  request  in writing
to  the Regional  Administrator,  and
demonstrates  to the satisfaction of the
Regional Administrator that such in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement  of §144.28(f)(3)(ii)  (A)  and
(B). The Regional Administrator may
grant such a  request after notice, op-
portunity  for comment,  and oppor-
tunity for a public hearing, according
to the provisions of part 124, subpart A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the Regional
Administrator  established  rules  for
maximum injection  pressure based on
data provided  pursuant to paragraph
(ii) below the owner or operator shall:
  (i) Limit  injection  pressure  to  a
value which  will not exceed the oper-
ating requirements  of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii)  Submit data acceptable  to  the
Regional Administrator which defines
the fracture  pressure of the formation
in which injection is  taking  place. A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two  or  more  operators conducting
operations in the same formation, if
the Regional Administrator  approves
such submission.  The data shall be sub-
mitted to the Regional Administrator
within 1 year of the effective date of
this program.
  (b) Casing  and  cementing. Where  the
Regional   Administrator  determines
that the owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced recovery  or hydrocarbon
storage well  may not be in compliance
with the requirements of §§ 144.28(e)  and
146.22, the owner or operator shall when
required by  the Regional  Adminis-
trator:
  (1) Isolate  all USDWs by placing ce-
ment between the  outermost  casing
and the well bore as follows:
  (i) If the injection well is east of the
108th meridian, cement the outermost
casing from a point 50 feet into a major
shale formation underlying the upper-
most USDW to  the surface.  For  the
purpose of this paragraph,  major shale
formations are defined as the Bearpaw,
Clagget, and Colorado formations.
  (ii) If the injection well is west of the
108th meridian, cement the outermost
casing to a depth of 1,000 feet,  or to the
base of  the lowermost  USDW in use as
a source of drinking water whichever is
deeper.  The  Regional  Administrator
may allow  an owner  or  operator to
cement to  a lesser depth if he  can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Regional Administrator that no USDW
will be  affected  by   the  injection
facilities.
  (2) Isolate any injection  zones  by
placing sufficient cement to fill  the
calculated  space between the  casing
and the well bore to  a point 250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the maximum  operating
pressure;
                                     764

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
              Pt. 147, Subpt. BB, App. A
  (ii) Which is resistant to deteriortion
from formation  and injection  fluids;
and
  (ill) In a quantity  no less than 120%
of the calculated volume necessary to
cement off a zone.
  (4)  The Regional Administrator may
specify other requirements in addition
to  or in lieu  of the requirements set
forth in paragraphs  (b) (1)  through (3)
of  this  section,  as needed to  protect
USDWs.

§ 147.1355  Requirements for all wells.
  (a)  Area  of  review. Notwithstanding
the alternatives  presented  in §146.6 of
this chapter, the area of review shall be
a fixed radius as described in §146.06(b)
of this chapter.
  (b)  The applicant must  give separate
notice of intent  to apply for a permit
to  each owner  or tenant of the  land
within  one-quarter  mile of  the  site.
This requirement may be waived by the
Regional  Administrator  where  indi-
vidual notice  to  all land owners  and
tenants  would be impractical. The ad-
dresses  of  those  to  whom  notice is
given, and a description of how notice
was given, shall be submitted with the
permit  application.  The  notice shall
include:
  (1) Name and address of applicant;
  (2)  A brief description of the planned
injection activities,  including well  lo-
cation, name and depth of the injection
zone, maximum injection pressure  and
volume, and fluid to be injected;
  (3) EPA contact person;  and
  (4)  A statement  that opportunity to
comment will be announced after EPA
prepares a draft permit.
  (c)  Owners and operators on or within
one-half mile of Indian lands  shall pro-
vide  notice  as specified  in paragraph
(b) of this section,  except  that such no-
tice shall be provided within a one-half
mile  radius  of the site.

APPENDIX  A TO SUBPART BB OF PART
    147—STATE   REQUIREMENTS   INCOR-
    PORATED BY REFERENCE  IN SUBPART
    BB OF  PART  147 OF  THE CODE  OF
    FEDERAL REGULATIONS

  The following is an informational listing of
state requirements incorporated by reference
In Subpart BB of part 147 of the Code of Fed-
eral Regulations.
          Subpart BB—Montana
  (a) The statutory provisions include:
  (1) Montana Code annotated, 1995, Title 2,
Chapter 15'
  Section 2-15-121. Allocation for administra-
tive purposes only.
  Section 2-15-124. Quasi-judicial boards.
  Section 2-15-3303. Board of oil and gas con-
servation-composition—allocation—quasi-ju-
dicial.
  (2) Montana Code annotated, 1995, Title 82,
Chapter 10.
  Section 82-10-101. Action for accounting for
royalty.
  Section 82-10-102. Remedy not exclusive.
  Section 82-10-103. Obligation to pay royal-
ties as essence of contract-interest.
  Section 82-10-104.  Payment  of royalties-
form of record required.
  Section  82-10-105   through   82-10-109 re-
served.
  Section  82-10-110.  Division  order-defini-
tion-effect.
  Section 82-10-201. Authorization for lease
and terms-land not subject to leasing.
  Section 82-10-202. Acreage pooling.
  Section 82-10-203. Interference with normal
use of land prohibited.
  Section 82-10-204. Lease of acquired oil and
gas interests.
  Section 82-10-301. Definitions.
  Section 82-10-302. Policy.
  Section 82-10-303. Use  of eminent domain
to acquire underground reservoirs.
  Section 82-10-304. Certificate of board re-
quired prior to use of eminent domain.
  Section 82-10-305. Proceedings.
  Section 82-10-401.  Notice required  before
abandonment of well-owner's option.
  Section 82-10-402. Inventory of abandoned
wells  and  seismic   operations-reclamation
procedures.
  Section 82-10-501. Purpose-legislative find-
ings.
  Section 82-10-502 Definitions.
  Section 82-10-503. Notice of drilling oper-
ations.
  Section 82-10-504. Surface damage and dis-
ruption  payments-penalty for  late payment.
  Section 82-10-505. Liability for damages to
property.
  Section 82-10-506. Notification of injury.
  Section 82-10-0507. Agreement—offer of set-
tlement.
  Section 82-10-508. Rejection—legal action.
  Section 82-10-509 and 82-10-510. Reserved.
  Section 82-10-511 Remedies cumulative.
  (3) Montana Code annotated, 1995, Title 82,
Chapter 11:
  Section 82-11-101. Definitions.
  Section 82-11-102. Oil or gas  wells not pub-
lic utilities.
  Section 82-11-103 Lands subject to law.
  Section 82-11-104. Construction-no conflict
with board of land commissioners' authority.
  Section  82-11-105   through   82-11-110 re-
served.
                                        765

-------
Pt.  147, Subpt. BB, App. A
           40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  Section  82-11-111.  Powers and  duties  of
board.
  Section  82-11-112.  Intergovernmental co-
operation.
  Section 82-11-113. Role of board in imple-
mentation of national gas policy.
  Section  82-11-114.  Appointment of exam-
iners.
  Section 82-11-115. Procedure  to  make de-
terminations.
  Section 82-11-116. Public access.
  Section   82-11-117.   Confidentiality    of
records.
  Section 82-11-118. Fees for processing appli-
cations.
  Section  82-11-119  through  82-11-120 re-
served.
  Section 82-11-121. Oil and gas  waste prohib-
ited.
  Section  82-11-122.  Notice of  intention  to
drill or conduct seismic operations-notice  to
surface owner.
  Section 82-11-123. Requirements for oil and
gas operations.
  Section 82-11-124. Requirement relating  to
waste prevention.
  Section 82-11-125. Availability of cores  or
chips,  cuttings,  and  bottom-hole tempera-
tures to board.
  Section 82-11-126. Availability of facilities
to bureau of mines.
  Section 82-11-127. Prohibited activity.
  Section  82-11-128  through  82-11-130 re-
served.
  Section 82-11-131. Privilege and license tax.
  Section 82-11-132. Statements to treasurer
and payment of tax.
  Section  82-11-133.  Penalty for  late  pay-
ment.
  Section 82-11-134. Permit  fees.
  Section  82-11-135.  Money earmarked for
board expenses.
  Section  82-11-136.  Expenditure  of  funds
from bonds for plugging wells.
  Section  82-11-137.  Class  II injection well
operating fee.
  Section  82-11-138  through  82-11-140 re-
served.
  Section  82-11-141.  Administrative proce-
dure.
  Section 82-11-142. Subpoena power-civil ac-
tions.
  Section 82-11-143. Rehearing.
  Section 82-11-144. Court review.
  Section 82-11-145. Injunction or restraining
order.
  Section 82-11-146. Appeal.
  Section 82-11-147. Violations.
  Section 82-11-148. Criminal penalties.
  Section 82-11-149. Civil penalties.
  Section 82-11-150. Legal assistance.
  Section  82-11-151. Emergencies-notice and
hearing.
  Section  82-11-152  through  82-11-160 re-
served.
  Section 82-11-161. Oil and  gas production
damage mitigation account-statutory appro-
priation.
  Section 82-11-162. Release of producing oil
or gas well from drilling bond-fee.
  Section  82-11-163.  Landowner's  bond  on
noncommercial well.
  Section 82-11-164. Lien created.
  Section  82-11-165  through 82-11-170  re-
served.
  Section 82-11-171. Terminated.
  Section  82-11-201.  Establishment of well
spacing units.
  Section 82-11-202. Pooling of interest with-
in spacing unit.
  Section 82-11-203. Pooling agreements not
in violation of antitrust laws.
  Section 82-11-204. Hearing on  operation of
pool as unit.
  Section 82-11-205. Board order for unit  op-
eration-criteria.
  Section 82-11-206. Terms  and conditions of
plan for unit operations.
  Section 82-11-207. Approval  of plan for unit
operations by persons paying  costs.
  Section  82-11-208.  Board   orders-amend-
ment.
  Section 82-11-209. Units established by pre-
vious order.
  Section 82-11-210. Unit operations-less than
whole of pool.
  Section 82-11-211. Operations considered as
done by all owners in unit.
  Section 82-11-212. Property rights and  op-
erator's lien.
  Section 82-11-213. Contract  not terminated
by board order.
  Section  82-11-214.  Title  to  oil and gas
rights not affected by board order.
  Section 82-11-215. Unit  operation not  re-
straint of trade.
  Section 82-11-216. No creation of relation-
ship between parties in unit.
  Section  82-11-301.  Authorization to join
interstate compact for conservation  of  oil
and gas.
  Section  82-11-302.  Interstate  oil and gas
compact.
  Section 82-11-303. Extension of  expiration
date.
  Section 82-11-304. Governor as member of
Interstate Oil Compact Commission.
  Section 82-11-305. Limitation  on power of
representative.
  Section 82-11-306. Expenses of representa-
tive.
  (b)  The regulatory provisions  include: Ad-
ministrative Rules of Montana Board of Oil
and  Gas  Conservation, Chapter 22, revised
March 1996:
  Rule 36.22.101. Organizational Rule.
  Rule 36.22.201. Procedural Rules.
  Rule 36.22.202.  Environmental  Policy Act
Procedural Rules.
  Rule 36.22.301. Effective Scope of Rules.
  Rule 36.22.302. Definitions.
                                           766

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
               Pt. 147, Subpt. BB, App. A
  Rule 36.22.303. Classification of Wildcat or
Exploratory Wells.
  Rule 36 22.304. Inspection  of Record, Prop-
erties, and Wells.
  Rule 36.22.305. Naming of Pools.
  Rule 36.22.306. Organization of Reports.
  Rule 36.22.307. Adoption of Forms
  Rule 36.22.308. Seal of Board.
  Rule 36.22.309.  Referral  of Administrative
Decisions
  Rule 36.22.401. Office and  Duties of Petro-
leum Engineer.
  Rule 36.22.402. Office and Duties of Admin-
istrator.
  Rule 36.22.403. Office and  Duties of Geolo-
gist.
  Rule 36.22.501. Shot Location Limitations.
  Rule 36.22.502. Plugging  and Abandonment.
  Rule 36.22.503. Notification.
  Rule 36.22.504. Identification.
  Rule 36.22.601. Notice of Intention and Per-
mit to Drill.
  Rule 36.22.602. Notice  of Intention to Drill
and Application for Permit to Drill.
  Rule 36.22.603. Permit Fees.
  Rule 36.22.604. Permit Issuance - Expiration
- Extension.
  Rule 36.22.605. Transfer of Permits.
  Rule 36.22.606. Notice and Eligibility State-
ment for Drilling or  Recompletion in Unit
Operations.
  Rule  36.22.607.   Drilling  Permits  Pending
Special Field Rules.
  Rule 36.22.701. Spacing Units - General.
  Rule 36.22.702. Spacing of Wells.
  Rule 36.22.703. Horizontal Wells.
  Rule 36.22.1001. Rotary Drilling Procedure.
  Rule 36.22.1002. Cable Drilling Procedure.
  Rule 36.22.1003.  Vertical Drilling Required
Deviation.
  Rule 36.22.1004 Dual Completion  of Wells.
  Rule 36.22.1005. Drilling Waste Disposal and
Surface Restoration.
  Rules  36.22.1006  through 3622.1010.  Re-
served.
  Rule 36.22 1011.  Well  Completion  and Re-
completion Reports.
  Rule  36.22.1012.  Samples of  Cores  and
Cuttings.
  Rule 36.22.1013.  Filing of Completion Re-
ports, Well Logs, Analyses, Reports, and Sur-
veys.
  Rule  36.22.1014.   Blowout  Prevention and
Well Control Equipment.
  Rule 36.22.1101. Fire Hazard Prevention.
  Rule 36.22.1102. Fire Walls  Required.
  Rule 36.22.1103. Notification and Report  of
Emergencies and Undesirable Incidents.
  Rule 36 22.1104. Control and Cleanup.
  Rule 36.22.1105. Solid Waste.
  Rule 36.22.1201. Surface Equipment.
  Rule 36.22.1202. Identification.
  Rule 36.22.1203. Chokes Required.
  Rule 36.22.1204. Separators Required.
  Rule 36.22.1205.  Vacuum  Pumps Prohibited.
  Rule 36.22.1206. Tubing- Required.
  Rule 36.22.1207. Earthen Pits and Open Ves-
sels.
  Rule  36.22.1208.  Producing  from  Different
Pools Through the Same Casing.
  Rules  36.22.1209 through  36.22.1212.  Re-
served
  Rule 36 22.1213. Reservoir or Pool Surveys
  Rule 36.22.1214. Subsurface Pressure Tests.
  Rule 36.22.1215. Stabilized Production Test.
  Rule 36.22.1216. Gas Oil Ratio Tests.
  Rule 36.22.1217. Water Production Report.
  Rule 36.22.1218. Gas to be Metered.
  Rule 36.22.1219. Gas Waste Prohibited.
  Rule  36.22.1220.  Associated  Gas  Flaring
Limitation—Application   to   exceed—Board
Review and Action.
  Rule 36.22.1221.  Burning of Waste  Gas Re-
quired.
  Rule 36.22.1222. Hydrogen Sulfide Gas.
  Rule  36 22.1223. Fencing,  Screening,  and
Netting of Pits.
  Rules 36 22.1224 and 36.22.1425. Reserved.
  Rule 36.22.1226. Disposal of Water.
  Rule 36.22 1227. Earthen Pits and Ponds
  Rule 36.22.1228  Disposal by Injection.
  Rule  36.22.1229.  Water  Injection  and  Gas
Repressuring.
  Rule  36.22.1230.  Application Contents  and
Requirements.
  Rule 36.22.1231.  Notice  of Application Ob-
jections.
  Rule 36.22.1232. Board Authorization.
  Rule 36.22.1233.  Notice  of Commencement
or Discontinuance—Plugging  of Abandoned
Wells.
  Rule 36.22.1234. Record Required.
  Rules  36 22.1235 through  36.22.1239  Re-
served.
  Rule  36.22.1240.  Report of  Well  Status
Change.
  Rule 36.22.1241. Service Company Reports.
  Rule 36.22.1242. Reports by Producers.
  Rule 36.22.1243. Reports from Transporters,
Refiners, and Gasoline or  Extraction Plants.
  Rule  36.22.1244. Producer's  Certificate of
Compliance.
  Rule 36.22.1245. Illegal Production.
  Rule 36.22.1301. Notice and Approval of In-
tention to Abandon Report.
  Rule 36.22.1302. Notice of Abandonment.
  Rule  36.22 1303.  Well  Plugging  Require-
ment.
  Rule 36.22.1304. Plugging Methods and Pro-
cedure.
  Rule 36.22.1305. Exception for  Fresh  Water
Wells.
  Rule 36.22.1306. Approval for Pulling Casing
and Reentering Wells.
  Rule 36.22.1307. Restoration of Surface.
  Rule 36.22.1308.  Plugging and Restoration
Bond.
  Rule 36.22.1309. Subsequent Report of Aban-
donment.
  Rule 36.22.1401. Definitions.
  Rule 36.22.1402. Underground Injection.
  Rule  36.22.1403.  Application Contents  and
Requirements Rules
                                           767

-------
§147.1400
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  Rule 36.22.1404 and 36.22.1405. Reserved.
  Rule 36.22.1406. Corrective Action.
  Rule 36.22.1407. Signing the Application.
  Rule 36.22.1408. Financial Responsibility.
  Rule 36.22.1409. Hearings.
  Rule 36.22.1410. Notice of Application.
  Rule 36.22.1411. Board Authorization.
  Rules 36.22.1412 and 36.22.1413. Reserved.
  Rule  36.22.1414.  Notice  of Commencement
or Discontinuance—Plugging of Abandoned
Wells.
  Rule 36.22.1415. Records Required.
  Rule 36.22.1416. Mechanical Integrity.
  Rule  36.22.1417.  Notification of Tests—Re-
porting Results.
  Rule 36.22.1418. Exempt Aquifers.
  Rule 36.22.1419. Tubingless Completions.
  Rules 36.22.1420 and 36.22.1421. Reserved.
  Rule 36.22.1422. Permit Conditions.
  Rule 36.22.1423. Injection Fee—Well Classi-
fication.
  Rule 36.22.1601. Who May Apply for Deter-
mination.
  Rule  36.22.1602.  Application Requirements
and Contents.
  Rule  36.22.1603.  Documents and Technical
Data Supporting Application.
  Rule 36.22.1604. Docket Number.
  Rule  36.22.1605.  List of  Applications—Pub-
lic Access.
  Rule 36.22.1606. Objections to Applications.
  Rule 36.22.1607. Deadlines for Action Deter-
minations.
  Rule 36.22.1608. Deficient Applications.
  Rule  36.22.1609.  Board Action on Applica-
tions.
  Rule 36.22.1610, Special Findings and Deter-
minations New  Onshore Production  Wells
Under Section 103.
  Rule 36.22.1611. Special Findings and Deter-
minations Stripper Well Production.
[61 FR 58934, Nov. 19, 1996]

      Subpart CC—Nebraska

§ 147.1400  State-administered      pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of Nebraska, except those  on
Indian lands, is the program adminis-
tered by the Nebraska Oil and Gas Con-
servation  Commission,   approved   by
EPA pursuant  to section 1425 of the
SDWA.
  (a) Incorporation  by reference.  The
requirements set forth in  the  State
statutes and regulations cited in  this
paragraph are hereby incorporated  by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the  State of Nebraska. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director  of the  Federal Register  on
June 25,1984.
  (1) Rules and Regulations of the Ne-
braska Oil and Gas Conservation Com-
mission, Rules 1  through  6  (as pub-
lished by the Commission, May 1981);
  (2) Revised Statutes of Nebraska, sec-
tions 57-903 and 57-906 (Reissue 1988).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations,  although  not  incor-
porated  by reference except for select
sections identified in paragraph (a) of
this  section,  are  also part of the  ap-
proved state-administered program:
  (1) Chapter  57, Oil  and Gas Conserva-
tion, Revised  Statutes of Nebraska sec-
tions 57-901  through  57-922  (Reissue
1985).
  (c)  The Memorandum of Agreement
between EPA  Region VII and the Ne-
braska Oil and Gas Conservation Com-
mission, signed by the EPA  Regional
Administrator on July 12, 1982.
  (d)  Statement of  legal authority. (1)
"Nebraska Underground Injection Con-
trol   Program,   Attorney   General's
Statement for Class II Wells," signed
by Assistant  Attorney General  for At-
torney  General  of Nebraska, as  sub-
mitted  with  "State of Nebraska Re-
quest for Administration of  UIC  Pro-
gram," January 23, 1982;
  (2) "Re: Nebraska Underground Injec-
tion  Control   Program,  Addendum  to
Attorney  General's  Statement   for
Class II Wells," signed by Assistant At-
torney General for Attorney General of
Nebraska," undated.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part  of
the  application  or as  supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 52
FR 17681, May  11, 1987; 56 FR  9417, Mar. 6,
1991]

§147.1401  State   administered   pro-
   gram—Class I, III, IV and V wells.
  The UIC program for Class  I, III, IV,
and V wells in the State of Nebraska,
except  those   on  Indian lands, is the
program administered by the  Nebraska
Department of Environmental Control,
approved by  EPA pursuant to  section
1422 of the SDWA.
  (a)  Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
                                      768

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1450
the State of Nebraska. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register effec-
tive June 26, 1984.
  (1) Nebraska Environmental Protec-
tion Act, Revised Statutes of Nebraska
sections 81-1502, 81-1506, 81-1519, and 81-
1520 (Reissue 1987);
  (2) Nebraska Department  of Environ-
mental Control,  Title 122—Rules and
Regulations for Underground Injection
and  Mineral Production  Wells,  Effec-
tive Date:  February 16, 1982, Amended
Dates:  November 12,  1983, March 22,
1984;  as amended by amendment ap-
proved by  the Governor on January 2,
1989.
  (b) Other laws. The following  statutes
and  regulations  although  not  incor-
porated by reference,  also  are part of
the approved  State-administered pro-
gram:
  (1) Nebraska Environmental Protec-
tion Act,  Nebraska Revised  Statutes
sections 81-1502, 81-1506, 81-1519, and 81-
1520 (Reissue  1987  and Cumm.  Supp.
1988);
  (c)(l)  The  Memorandum of Agree-
ment between EPA Region VII and the
Nebraska  Department  of  Environ-
mental  Control, signed by the EPA Re-
gional Administrator on July 12, 1982.
  (2) Addendum to  Underground  Injec-
tion Control  Memorandum of Agree-
ment signed by the EPA Regional Ad-
ministrator on July 12, 1982.
  (3) Amendments to the Memorandum
of Agreement signed by the EPA Re-
gional Administrator on November 22.
1983.
  (d)  Statement of  legal authority. (1)
"Nebraska  Underground Injection Con-
trol   Program,   Attorney   General's
Statement for Class  I, III, IV, and V
Wells",  signed  by Assistant Attorney
General  for Attorney  General  of Ne-
braska, as submitted with "State of Ne-
braska  Request for Administration of
UIC Program, January 28, 1982;
  (2) Letter from  Attorney  General (of
Nebraska), by  Assistant Attorney Gen-
eral,  to  Director, (Nebraska)  Depart-
ment of Environmental Control, Au-
gust 7, 1981;
  (3) Letter from  Attorney  General (of
Nebraska), by  Assistant Attorney Gen-
eral,  to  Director, (Nebraska)  Depart-
ment of Environmental Control, April
29, 1982;
  (4) Letter from Attorney General (of
Nebraska), by Assistant Attorney Gen-
eral, to Legal Counsel, (Nebraska) De-
partment  of  Environmental Control,
October 18, 1983.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted  as part  of
the original application or as supple-
ments thereto.

(42 U.S.C. 1422)

[49 PR 24134, June 12, 1984, as amended at 52
FR  17681,  May 11, 1987; 56 FB 9417, Mar. 6,
1991]

§147.1402  Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
    served]

§ 147.1403  EPA-administered     pro-
    gram—Indian lands.

  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells  on Indian lands in the
State of Nebraska is  administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements  set forth in the remainder
of this subpart. Injection well owners
and operators, and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian Lands in
Nebraska is June 25, 1984.

[52 FR 17681, May  11, 1987, as amended at 56
PR 9417, Mar. 6, 1991]

       Subpart DD—Nevada

§ 147.1450  State-administered    pro-
    gram.

  The UIC program  for all  classes of
underground  injection wells  in the
State of Nevada, other than  those on
Indian lands, is the  program adminis-
tered by the Nevada Division of  Envi-
ronmental Protection approved by EPA
pursuant to section 1422 of the SDWA.
Notice of this approval was  published
in the FEDERAL  REGISTER on February
18, 1988; the effective date of this pro-
gram is October 5, 1988. This program
consists of the following  elements, as
submitted to EPA in  the State's pro-
gram application.
  (a)  Incorporation  by  reference.  The
requirements  set forth in  the  State
statutes  and regulations cited in this
paragraph are hereby  incorporated by
                                    769

-------
§147.1451
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State  of Nevada. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the Federal Register in ac-
cordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained at the
Nevada  Department   of  Conservation
and Natural Resources, Division of En-
vironmental  Protection, 201 South Fall
Street, Carson City, Nevada 89710.
  Copies may be inspected at the Envi-
ronmental  Protection Agency,  Region
IX, 215 Fremont Street, San Francisco,
California 99105, or at the National Ar-
chives  and  Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the avail-
ability of this material at NARA,  call
202-741-6030,   or    go   to:    http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of__federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1) Nevada Revised Statutes  [NRS],
Volume  25,  Chapters 445.131 through
445.354, Inclusive. 1987.
  (2) Nevada Revised Statutes  [NRS],
Volume  29, Chapters 534A.010 through
534A.090, Inclusive. 1987.
  (3) Nevada Revised Statutes  [NRS],
Volume  28,  Chapters 522.010 through
522.190, Inclusive. 1987.
  (4)  Nevada   Administrative  Code
[NAG], Underground  Injection Control
Regulations, Sections 1  through 96.1,
Inclusive.  July  22, 1987,  revised Sep-
tember  3, 1987 (amending  NAC Chapter
445).
  (5)  Nevada   Administrative  Code
[NAC], Regulations and Rules of Prac-
tice  and Procedure adopted Pursuant
to NRS 534A, Sections 1 through 69, In-
clusive.  November  12, 1985 (amending
NAC Chapter 534A).
  (6)  Nevada   Administrative  Code
[NAC], Regulations and Rules of Prac-
tice  and Procedure adopted Pursuant
to NRS  522.010 through  522.625,  Inclu-
sive.  July  22,  1987   (amending  NAC
Chapter 522).
  (b) The Memorandum  of  Agreement
between EPA Region 9 and  the Nevada
Department  of Conservation and Nat-
ural Resources signed by the EPA Re-
gional Administrator on April 6, 1988.
  (c)  Statement  of  Legal   Authority.
Statement  and  Amendment  to  the
Statement from the  Attorney General
of the State  of Nevada, signed on July
22, 1987 and  November 6, 1987  respec-
tively, by  the Deputy Attorney  Gen-
eral.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the original  application or as supple-
ments thereto.

[53 FR 39089, Oct. 5, 1988]

§147.1451   EPA    administered   pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for  all
classes of wells on Indian  lands in the
State of  Nevada  is administered  by
EPA. This  program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional  re-
quirements set forth in the remainder
of this subpart. Injection  well owners
and  operators, and EPA shall comply
with these  requirements.
  (b) Effective dates.  The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Nevada is June 25, 1984.

[53 FR 43088, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9417, Mar. 6, 1991]

§147.1452   Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
   served]

§147.1453   Existing Class I, II (except
   enhanced recovery  and hydro-
   carbon storage)  and III wells au-
   thorized by rule.
  Maximum  injection   pressure.   The
owner or operator shall limit  injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable; or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by  using the  formula:

Pm=(0.733-0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=injection  pressure at the wellhead in
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific   gravity  of  injected   fluid
  (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.

§147.1454   Existing Class  II enhanced
   recovery  and hydrocarbon storage
   wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure. (1)  To
meet the  operating requirements  of
§144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap-
ter, the  owner or operator:
  (i) Shall  use an injection pressure no
greater  than the  pressure established
by the Regional Administrator for the
                                     770

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1500
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional Administrator
shall  establish such a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment,  and  opportunity for  a public
hearing,  according: to the provisions of
part 124,  subpart A of this chapter, and
will inform owners and  operators  in
writing  of  the applicable maximum
pressure; or
  (ii)  May inject at pressures greater
than  those   specified  in  paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for the field or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits a request in writing
to  the  Regional  Administrator,  and
demonstrates  to the satisfaction of the
Regional Administrator that  such in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement of  §144,28(f)(3)(ii)  (A)  and
(B). The  Regional Administrator may
grant such a  request after notice,  op-
portunity  for comment,  and  oppor-
tunity for public hearing, according to
the provisions of part 124, subpart A of
this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the  Regional
Administrator establishes  field rules
for maximum  injection pressure based
on  data  provided  pursuant  to para-
graph  (a)(2)(ii) of  this  section   the
owner or operator shall:
  (i)  Limit injection  pressure to a
value which will not exceed the oper-
ating requirements  of  §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii)  Submit  data acceptable  to  the
Regional Administrator which defines
the fracture pressure of the formation
in which injection  is taking  place. A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two or  more operators  conducting
operations in  the  same formation, if
the Regional  Administrator  approves
such submission. The data shall be sub-
mitted to the Regional Administrator
within one year following the  effective
date of this program.
  (b) Casing and cementing. Where the
Regional  Administrator   determines
that the owner or operator of  an exist-
ing enhanced  recovery or hydrocarbon
storage well may not be in compliance
with the requirements of §§144.28(e) and
146.22, the owner or operator shall com-
ply with  paragraphs (b) (1) through (4)
of this section, when required  by the
Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface casing by recir-
culating the  cement to  the  surface
from a point  50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all  USDWs by placing
cement between the  outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2)  Isolate  any injection zones by
placing sufficient cement  to  fill  the
calculated  space between  the  casing
and  the well  bore to a  point 250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand  the maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant to deteriora-
tion  from  formation   and injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the calculated volume necessary to
cement off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator may
specify other requirements in addition
to or in lieu  of the  requirements  set
forth in paragraphs  (b) (1) through (3)
of this section, as needed to  protect
USDWs.

   Subpart EE—New Hampshire

§ 147.1500 State-administered     pro-
   gram.
  The UIC program for  all classes of
wells in the State of New Hampshire,
except those wells on Indian lands, is
the program administered by the New
Hampshire  Department  of Environ-
mental Services, approved by the EPA
pursuant to section 1422 of the SDWA.
Notice of this approval  was published
in the PR on September  21, 1982 (47 FR
41561); the  effective date  of this pro-
gram is October 21, 1982. This program
consists of the following elements:
  (a) Incorporation by reference.  The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of New Hampshire. This in-
corporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register
on June 25, 1984.
  (1) New Hampshire  Revised Statutes
Annotated section 149:8 III(a) (1978);
  (2) New Hampshire  Code of Adminis-
trative  Rules,  Part We 410 (Protection
                                    771

-------
§147.1501
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of Groundwaters of the State, sections
Ws 410.1 through Ws 410.16) (Issue Ws 3-
82).
  (b)(l)  The  Memorandum  of Agree-
ment between EPA Region I and the
New Hampshire Water Supply and Pol-
lution Control Commission, signed by
the  EPA  Regional  Administrator  on
August 23, 1982;
  (2) Amendment No. 1 to the Memo-
randum of Agreement, signed by the
EPA Regional Administrator on July
16, 1982.
  (c)  Statement of  legal authority.  (1)
Letter from Attorney General of New
Hampshire to Regional Administrator,
EPA Region I, "Re:  Attorney General's
Statement—Underground     Injection
Control Program," March 23, 1982;
  (2) Letter from Attorney  General  of
New Hampshire  to  Regional Adminis-
trator,  EPA  Region  I, "Re: Attorney
General's  Statement—Underground  In-
jection Control Program," July 1, 1982.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials  submitted  as  part  of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.
[49 PR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
PR 43088, Oct. 25,  1988; 56 PR 9417, Mar. 6,
1991]

§ 147.1501  EPA-administered     pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on  Indian lands in the
State of New Hampshire is adminis-
tered by EPA. This  program consists of
the  UIC program requirements  of  40
CPR parts 124, 144, 146, 148, and any ad-
ditional requirements set forth in the
remainder  of  this  subpart. Injection
well  owners and operators,  and EPA
shall comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective  date.  The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
New Hampshire is November 25, 1988.
[53 PR 43088, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
PR 9417, Mar. 6, 1991]

      Subpart FF—New Jersey

§ 147.1550  State-administered     pro-
   gram.
  The UIC program for all classes  of
wells in the State  of New Jersey,  ex-
cept those on Indian lands,  is the pro-
gram administered  by the New Jersey
Department of Environmental Protec-
tion, approved by EPA pursuant to sec-
tion 1422 of the SDWA. Notice of this
approval was published in the Federal
Register on July 15, 1983 (48 FR 32343);
the effective date of this  program  is
August  15,  1983. This program consists
of the following elements, as submitted
to EPA  in the State's program applica-
tion.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble  UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of New Jersey. This incorpo-
ration by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Water Pollution Control Act, New
Jersey  Statutes  Annotated  sections
58:10A-1  through 58:10A-20 (West 1982
and Supp. 1990);
  (2) New Jersey Administrative  Code,
sections 7:14A-1.1  through  1.9  (sub-
chapter 1), 7:14A-2.1 through 2.15 (sub-
chapter 2),  7:14A-5.1  through 5.17, (sub-
chapter 5) (amended March 1988).
  (b)(l)  The Memorandum Agreement
between EPA  Region II and the  New
Jersey Department  of  Environmental
Protection,  signed  by  the  EPA Re-
gional Administrator on September  9,
1982;
  (2) Letter from  Commissioner,  New
Jersey Department  of  Environmental
Protection, to Regional Administrator,
EPA Region II, March 21, 1983.
  (c)  Statement  of  legal authority. (1)
Letter from Attorney General  of New
Jersey (by Deputy Attorney General)
to Commissioner, Department of Envi-
ronmental Protection, "Re: New Jersey
Pollutant Discharge Elimination  Sys-
tem—Underground  Injection Control,"
February 9, 1982;
  (2) Letter from Attorney General  of
New Jersey (by Deputy Attorney Gen-
eral) to Commissioner,  Department  of
Environmental Protection, "Re:  New
Jersey  Pollutant   Discharge   Elimi-
nation System—Underground Injection
Control," April 15, 1983 (six pages);
  (3) Letter from Attorney General  of
New  Jersey  (by  Assistant  Attorney
General) to Commissioner, Department
of Environmental Protection, "Re: New
                                    772

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1601
Jersey  Pollutant  Discharge   Elimi-
nation System—Underground Injection
Control," April 15, 1983 (two pages).
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted  as  part  of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.

[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984,  as amended at 53
FR 43089,  Oct. 25,  1988;  56 FR 9417,  Mar 6,
1991]

§ 147.1551  EPA-administered     pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC  program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State of New Jersey is administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148,  and any additional re-
quirements set forth  in the remainder
of this subpart.  Injection well owners
and  operators, and EPA shall  comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for  Indian lands in
New Jersey is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43089, Oct. 25, 1988,  as amended at 56
FR 9417, Mar. 6, 1991]

    Subpart GG—New Mexico

§ 147.1600  State-administered     pro-
   gram—Class II •wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of New Mexico,  except  for
those on Indian lands,  is the program
administered by the  New Mexico En-
ergy  and  Minerals   Department,  Oil
Conservation  Division,  approved  by
EPA pursuant to  section  1425  of the
SDWA.  Notice of this  approval was
published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on
February 5, 1982  (47 FR  5412); the effec-
tive  date of  this program is March 7,
1982. This program consists of the fol-
lowing elements as submitted to EPA
in the State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation  by  reference.  The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA  for
the State of New Mexico. This incorpo-
ration  by reference   was  approved  by
the Director of the Federal Register on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Oil and Gas Act, New Mexico Stat-
utes Annotated sections 70-2-1 through
-36 (1978);
  (2) State of New  Mexico Energy and
Mineral Department, Oil Conservation Di-
vision—Rules  and Regulations (dated 10-
1-78), sections B-3,  1-701 through 1-708,
M-1100 through M-1121.
  (b)(l)  The  Memorandum of  Agree-
ment between EPA Region VI and the
New Mexico  Energy and  Minerals De-
partment,  Oil Conservation Division,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on December 10, 1981;
  (2) Addendum No.  1  to the Memo-
randum of Agreement,  signed by the
EPA Regional Administrator  on June
28, 1982;
  (3) Addendum No.  2  to the Memo-
randum of Agreement,  signed by the
EPA  Regional Administrator  on No-
vember 18, 1982;
  (4) Letter  from  Director, Oil  Con-
servation  Division, New Mexico Energy
and Minerals Department, and Assist-
ant Attorney General of  New Mexico,
to Regional  Administrator, EPA Re-
gion VI, November 6, 1981.
  (c)  Statement  of  legal authority.
"Statement of Legal  Authority of the
State of New Mexico by  and through
its Oil Conservation Division of the En-
ergy and Mines Department to conduct
an Underground  Injection Control Pro-
gram," signed by  Assistant Attorney
General and General Counsel to the Oil
Conservation Division.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials  submitted as  part of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43089, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.1601  State-administered      pro-
   gram—Class I, III, IV and V wells.
  The UIC program for Class I, III, IV
and V injection wells in  the  State of
New Mexico,  except for those on Indian
lands, is the  program administered by
the New Mexico  Water Quality Control
Commission,  the  Environmental Im-
provement Division, and  the Oil  Con-
servation  Division, approved  by  EPA
pursuant to section 1422 of the SDWA.
Notice of  this approval was published
in the FEDERAL  REGISTER on  July 11,
1983 (48 FR 31640); the effective date of
this  program is August  10, 1983.  This
                                    773

-------
§147.1603
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
program consists of the following ele-
ments,  as  submitted  to  EPA in the
State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of New Mexico. This incorpo-
ration by reference was  approved by
the Director of the Federal Register on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) New Mexico  Water Quality Con-
trol Commission  Regulations (WQCC
82-1) sections 1-100 through 5-300 (Sep-
tember 20, 1982).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations,  although  not incor-
porated by reference,  are also part  of
the  approved  State-administered UIC
program:
  (1) Water  Quality Act, New Mexico
Statutes  Annotated  sections  74-6-1
through 74-6-13 (1978 and Supp. 1982);
  (2) Geothermal Resources  Conserva-
tion Act, New  Mexico Statutes Anno-
tated sections  71-5-1  through 71-5-24
(1978 and Supp.  1982);
  (3) Surface Mining  Act, New Mexico
Statutes Annotated sections 69-25A-1
through 69-25A-35 (1978 and Supp. 1980).
  (c)(l)  The  Memorandum  of Agree-
ment between EPA Region VI and the
New  Mexico Water  Quality  Control
Commission,  the  Environmental Im-
provement  Division, and the Oil Con-
servation Division, signed by the EPA
Regional Administrator on  April  13,
1983;
  (2) Letter from  the Director,  Envi-
ronmental  Improvement Division and
the  Director,   Oil Conservation  Divi-
sion, to Regional Administrator, EPA
Region  IV,  "Re:  New  Mexico Under-
ground  Injection  Control  Program—
Clarification," February 10, 1983.
  (d) Statement  of legal authority. "At-
torney General's Statement," signed by
the Assistant Attorney General for the
Environmental Improvement Division,
the Assistant Attorney General for Oil
Conservation Division, and the Deputy
Attorney General, Civil Division, Coun-
sel for the Mining and Minerals Divi-
sion,  undated,  submitted December 8,
1982.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted  as  part  of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.

[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43089, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.1603  EPA-administered     pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in New
Mexico  is administered  by EPA. The
program consists of the requirements
set forth at Subpart HHH of this part.
Injection  well  owners  and  operators
and EPA  shall comply  with these  re-
quirements.
  (b) Effective date. The  effective date
for the UIC program on Indian lands in
New Mexico is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43089, Oct. 25, 1988]
      Subpart HH—New York

§ 147.1650 State-administered
   gram. [Reserved]
pro-
§ 147.1651  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
State of New York, including all Indian
lands,  is  administered by  EPA.  The
program  consists  of the UIC  program
requirements of 40 CFR parts 124, 144,
146,  148,  and  any additional  require-
ments set forth  in  the  remainder  of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall  comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
of the UIC program for New York for
all injection activities except  those on
lands of  the  Seneca  Indian  Tribe  is
June 25, 1984. The effective date for the
UIC  program for the lands of  the Sen-
eca Indian Tribe is November 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43089, Oct. 25, 1988; 54  FR 10616, Mar.
14, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 9417, Mar. 6,
1991]

§ 147.1652  Aquifer exemptions.
  (a) This section identifies any aquifer
or their portions exempted in accord-
ance  with §§144.7(b) and  146.4 of this
chapter at the time of program promul-
gation. EPA may in the future exempt
other aquifers or portions, according to
applicable procedures, without  codi-
fying such exemptions in  this section.
An  updated list of exemptions will be
maintained in the Regional office.
                                    774

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1654
  (b) The following portions of aquifers
are  exempted in accordance  with the
provisions of §§ 144.7(b) and 146.4 of this
chapter for Class II injection activities
only:
  (1) The Bradford First, Second, and
Third  Sand  Members  and  the  Kane
Sand Member in the Bradford Field in
Cattaraugus County.
  (2)  The  Chipmunk  Oil   field  in
Cattaraugus County.

§147.1653  Existing Class I, II (except
    enhanced   recovery  and  hydro-
    carbon storage) and  III wells au-
    thorized by rule.
  Maximum  injection  pressure.  The
owner or operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating  requirements  of § 144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable; or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:
Pm=(0.733- 0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=injection pressure at the well head in
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific gravity of inject fluid (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.

§147.1654  Existing Class II enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage
    •wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure. (1) To
meet  the  operating requirements  of
§ 144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap-
ter,  the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall  use an injection pressure no
greater than  the pressure established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional Administrator
shall establish such a maximum  pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for  com-
ment,  and opportunity for  a public
hearing, according  to the provisions of
part 124, subpart A  of this chapter, and
will inform owners  and  operators  in
writing  of the applicable maximum
pressure, or
  (ii) May inject at  pressures greater
than  those  specified  in  paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of  this section for the field or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits a request in writing
to  the Regional  Administrator,  and
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Regional Administrator that  such in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement of  §144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A)  and
(B).  The Regional  Administrator may
grant such a request after notice, op-
portunity  for  comment,  and  oppor-
tunity for a public hearing, according
to the provisions of part 124, subpart  A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the Regional
Administrator   establishes  rules  for
maximum injection pressure based on
data  provided  pursuant to  paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)  of  this section the  owner or
operator shall:
  (i)  Limit injection  pressure  to  a
value which will not exceed  the oper-
ating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii) Submit  data acceptable  to  the
Regional Administrator which defines
the fracture pressure of the formation
in which injection is  taking place.  A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two or more  operators  conducting
operations in  the  same formation,  if
the  Regional  Administrator approves
such submission. The data shall be sub-
mitted to the Regional Administrator
within one year of the effective date of
this program.
  (b)  Casing and cementing. Where  the
Regional   Administrator   determines
that the  owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced recovery  or hydrocarbon
storage well may not be in compliance
with the  requirements of §§ 144.28(e) and
146.22, the owner or operator shall com-
ply with paragraphs (b) (1) through (4)
of this section, when  required by  the
Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface casing by recir-
culating  the  cement   to  the surface
from  a point 50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii)  Isolating all  USDWs  by placing
cement between the outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (ill)  For wells  as  described   in
§146.8(b)(3)(ii), installing a smaller di-
ameter pipe inside the existing  injec-
tion  tubing and setting it on an appro-
priate packer; and
  (2)  Isolate any injection zones by
placing sufficient cement to fill  the
calculated space between the  casing
and the  well bore to  a point 50 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use  cement:
                                    775

-------
§147.1655
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant  to  deteriora-
tion  from  formation  and  injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the calculated volume necessary to
cement off a zone.
  (4) The  Regional Administrator  may
specify other requirements in addition
to or in lieu  of the  requirements set
forth in paragraphs  (b) (1) through (3)
of this section  as needed  to  protect
USDWs.

§ 147.1655  Requirements  for wells au-
    thorized by permit.
  (a) The  owner or operator  of a Class
I well authorized  by permit shall in-
stall or shall ensure that the well has:
  (1) Surface casing present;
  (i) Extending from the surface  to a
depth at least 50 feet below the base of
the lowermost USDW; and
  (ii) Cemented back to the surface by
recirculating the cement;  and
  (2) Long string casing and tubing;
  (i) Extending to the injection zone;
and
  (ii) Cemented back to  50 feet above
the  base  of the next  largest  casing
string.
  (b) The  owner or operator of a new
Class  II  well  authorized  by  permit
shall:
  (1) Install  surface  casing from  the
surface to at least  50 feet below the
base of the lowermost USDW.
  (2)  Cement  the casing- by recircu-
lating to the surface or by using no less
than 120% of the calculated annular
volume.
  (3) For new enhanced recovery wells,
install tubing or long string casing ex-
tending to the injection zone.
  (4) For new salt water disposal wells,
install long string casing and tubing
extending to the injection zone.
  (5) Isolate any injection zone by plac-
ing  sufficient cement to fill the  cal-
culated volume to a point 50 feet above
the injection zone.
  (c) The  Regional Administrator may
specify casing and cementing require-
ments other than those listed in para-
graphs (a) and (b) of this section  on a
case by case basis as conditions of the
permit.
    Subpart II—North Carolina

§ 147.1700 State-administered     pro-
   gram.
  The UIC program for  all  classes of
wells  in the State of North Carolina,
except those wells on Indian lands, is
the program administered by the North
Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources approved
by EPA pursuant to section 1422 of the
SDWA.  Notice  of this  approval was
published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on
April 19, 1984 (49 FR 15553); the effective
date of this program is  April 19,  1984.
This program consists of the following
elements, as submitted to EPA in the
State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the Stabe stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by  ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC  program under the SDWA for
the State of North  Carolina. This in-
corporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the OFR in accord-
ance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1  CFR
part 51. Copies may be obtained at the
North Carolina Department of Environ-
ment, Health and Natural Resources,
P.O. Box 27687,  Raleigh, North Carolina
27611. Copies may be inspected at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Re-
gion IV, 345 Courtland Street, NE., At-
lanta, Georgia 30365, or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the avail-
ability of this  material at NARA, call
202-741-6030,    or   go    to:    http://
www. archives .gov/federal	register/
code	of _federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1)  Administrative  Procedure  Act,
N.C. GEN. STAT.  150B-1 through 150B-
64 (1987 and Cumm. Supp. 1989);
  (2) North Carolina Well Construction
Act, N.C. GEN. STAT. §§87-83 through
87-99 (1989 and Cumm. Supp. 1989):
  (3) Water and  Air  Resources,  N.C.
GEN.  STAT.   §§143-211  through  143-
215.10 (1987 and Cumm. Supp. 1989);
  (4)  Solid  Waste Management,  N.C.
GEN. STAT. §§130A-290  through  130A-
309.03 (1989);
  (5) North Carolina  Drinking Water
Act.  N.C.  GEN.  STAT.   §§130A-311
through 130A-332 (1989);
                                     776

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1750
  (6)  Sanitary Sewage Systems,  N.C.
GEN. STAT. §§130A-333 through. 130A-
335 (1989).
  (b)  Other  laws. The following rules
and regulations, although  not incor-
porated by reference,  are also part of
the    approved    State-administered
program:
  (1) N.C. ADMIN.  CODE, Title 15, r.
02L.0100 et seq. Groundwater Classifica-
tion and Standards: General Consider-
ations (September 22, 1988);
  (2) N.C. ADMIN.  CODE, Title 15, r.
02L.0100 et seq. Criteria and Standards
Applicable to Injection  Wells  (Sep-
tember 22, 1988).
  (c)  Memorandum  of Agreement.  The
Memorandum of Agreement  between
the State of North Carolina and EPA
Region IV, signed March 1,1984.
  (d) Statement of legal authority. (1) Un-
derground Injection Control Program,
Attorney  General's Statement (June
15, 1982);
  (2) Amendment to Underground  In-
jection  Control  Program,  Attorney
General's Statement (February 9, 1984).
  (e) Program Description. The Program
Description  and other materials  sub-
mitted as part of the application or as
supplements thereto.

[56 FR 9417, Mar. 6, 1991]

§§ 147.1701-147.1702   [Reserved]

§ 147.1703  EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State of  North Carolina is adminis-
tered by EPA. This program consists of
the UIC  program requirements  of  40
CFR parts 124, 144, 146, 148, and any ad-
ditional requirements  set forth in the
remainder of this  subpart.  Injection
well owners  and operators, and EPA
shall comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date.  The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
North Carolina is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43089, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9418, Mar. 6, 1991]
§§147.1704-147.1749  [Reserved]

     Subpart JJ—North Dakota

§ 147.1750 State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the  State  of  North  Dakota,  except
those on Indian lands, is the program
administered by the North Dakota In-
dustrial Commission, approved by EPA
pursuant to section 1425 of the SDWA.
Notice of this  approval was  published
in the FEDERAL REGISTER on August 23,
1983 (48 FR 38237); the effective date of
this program  is  September  24, 1983.
This program consists of the following
elements, as submitted to EPA in  the
State's program application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in  this para-
graph  are  hereby  incorporated  by
reference and made a part of the  ap-
plicable UIC program under the SDWA
for the State of North Dakota. This in-
corporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register
on June 25, 1984.
  (1)  North  Dakota  Century   Code,
Chapter 38-08 (Control of Gas and  Oil
Resources, 1987 and Supp. 1989);
  (2)  North   Dakota Administrative
Code,  Chapter 43-02-05  (Underground
Injection Control, as published in Stat-
utes and Rules for the Conservation of Oil
and Gas, North Dakota Industrial Com-
mission,  revised effective November 1,
1987);
  (3)  North   Dakota Administrative
Code, Chapter 43-02-03 (General Rules,
as published in Statutes  and Rules for
the Conservation of Oil and Gas, North
Dakota Industrial Commission, revised
effective November 1, 1987).
  (b) The Memorandum of Agreement
between  EPA  Region  VIII  and  the
North Dakota Industrial  Commission,
Oil and  Gas Division,  signed  by  the
EPA Regional  Administrator on June
16, 1983, as  amended September 7, 1989.
  (c) Statement of legal authority. "Un-
derground Injection Control Program
Attorney General's Statement," as sub-
mitted with the North Dakota Under-
ground Injection Control Program Pri-
macy Application for Class II Injection
Wells, transmitted by the Governor on
July 15, 1982 (16 pages).
                                    777

-------
§147.1751
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (d)  The  Program  Description and
other materials submitted as part  of
the  application   or  as  supplements
thereto.

[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984,  as amended at 53
FR 43089,  Oct. 25, 1988: 56 FR 9418, Mar. 6,
1991]

§ 147.1751 State-administered     pro-
   gram—Class I,  III, IV and V wells.
  The UIC program for  Class I, III, IV,
and V wells in the State  of North Da-
kota, except those on Indian lands, is
the program administered by the North
Dakota  Department of  Health,  ap-
proved by EPA pursuant to section 1422
of the  SDWA. Notice of this approval
was  published in the  FEDERAL  REG-
ISTER on September 21, 1984; the effec-
tive date of this program is October 5,
1984. This program consists of the fol-
lowing elements,  as submitted to EPA
in the State's program application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State  stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited  in  this
paragraph are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of North Dakota. This incor-
poration by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register ef-
fective October 5, 1984.
  (1)  North Dakota Century  Code Sec-
tions 38-12-01, 38-12-03 (1980);
  (2)  North Dakota Century Code, Sec-
tions 61-28-02 and 61-28-06  (1989);
  (3)   North   Dakota   Administrative
Code Sections  33-25-01-01 through 33-
25-01-18  (North  Dakota State  Health
Department Underground Control Pro-
gram) (1983);
  (4)   North   Dakota   Administrative
Code,  Chapter 43-02-02   (Subsurface
Mineral Exploration and Development)
(August  1986),  and  Chapter 43-02-02.1
(Underground  Injection Control  Pro-
gram) (March 1, 1984);
  (5)   North   Dakota   Administrative
Code Sections 43-02-02-1-01 through 43-
02-02-1-18 (North  Dakota  Geological
Survey—Undergound Injection Control
Program) (1984);
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations,   although  not incor-
porated by reference, also are part of
the    approved    State-administered
program;
  (1) North Dakota Environmental Law
Enforcement Act of 1975, North Dakota
Century Code Sections 32-40-01 to 32-
40-11 (1976);
  (2) North  Dakota Century Code, Ch.
38-12  (Regulation, Development,  and
Production  of  Subsurface  Minerals)
(1979);
  (3) North Dakota Century Code Chap-
ter  61-28  (Control,  Prevention  and
Abatement of Pollution of Surface Wa-
ters) (1989);
  (4)  North Dakota   Administrative
Code Article 33-22 (Practice and Proce-
dure) (1983).
  (c) The Memorandum of Agreement
between EPA  Region  VIII  and  the
North  Dakota  Department of Health,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on May 18, 1984.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the original application or as supple-
ments thereto.

[49 FR 37066, Sept. 21, 1984, as amended at 56
FR 9418, Mar  6, 1991]

§ 147.1752 EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC  program for all
classes of wells  on Indian lands in the
State of North  Dakota is administered
by EPA. This program  consists of the
UIC program requirements of 40 CFR
parts 124. 144,  146, 148, and any addi-
tional requirements set forth in the re-
mainder of this  subpart. Injecti on well
owners  and operators,  and EPA shall
comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for  Indian lands in
North Dakota is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43089,  Oct.  25, 1988,  as amended at 56
FR 9418. Mar. 6, 1991]

         Subpart KK—Ohio

§ 147.1800 State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of Ohio, except for those on
Indian lands, is the program adminis-
tered by the Ohio Department of Nat-
ural Resources,  approved by EPA pur-
suant to section 1425 of the SDWA. No-
tice of this approval was published in
the FEDERAL REGISTER on August 23,
1983 (48 FR 38238); the effective date of
                                    778

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1801
this program is  September  22,  1983.
This program consists of the following
elements, as submitted to EPA in the
State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State  stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited  in  this
paragraph are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part  of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Ohio. This incorporation
by  reference was  approved by the Di-
rector of the Federal Register  on  June
25, 1984.
  (1) Ohio Revised Code Annotated, sec-
tions 1509.01 through 1509.22 (Page 1978
and Supp. 1982);
  (2) Rules of the Division of Oil and
Gas, Ohio Administrative Code  sections
1501:91-01, through 1501: 9-11-13 (1983).
  (b) The Memorandum of Agreement
between  EPA Region  V and the  Ohio
Department of Natural Resources.
  (c) Statement of legal authority. "Un-
derground Injection  Control Program—
Attorney General's Statement," signed
by  the  Assistant Attorney  General,
Chief,  Environmental Law Section, for
the  Attorney General of Ohio,  Sep-
tember 30, 1982.
  (d) The Program Description  and any
other  materials submitted as  part of
the  application  or  as   supplements
thereto.
[49 FR  20197, May  11, 1984, as amended at 53
PR 43089, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.1801 State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class I, III, IV and V  wells.
  The  UIC program for Class I, III, IV,
and V wells in the State of Ohio, other
than those on Indian lands, is  the pro-
gram administered by the Ohio Depart-
ment  of Natural Resources  and  the
Ohio Environmental Protection Agen-
cy,  approved by EPA pursuant to sec-
tion 1422 of the SDWA. Notice of this
approval was published in the FEDERAL
REGISTER on November 29, 1984; the ef-
fective date of this program is January
14,  1985.  This program consists of the
following elements, as  submitted  to
EPA in  the  State's program  applica-
tion.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State  stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited  in  this
paragraph are hereby  incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Ohio.  This incorporation
by reference was approved  by the Di-
rector of the Federal Register effective
January 14, 1985.
  (1) Ohio Revised Code Annotated, sec-
tions 1509.01,  1509.03,  1509.221  (Supp.
1983);
  (2) Rules of the Division  of Oil and
Gas, Ohio  Administrative  Code,  sec-
tions 1501:9-7-01 through 7-14 (1984);
  (3) Ohio Revised Code Annotated, sec-
tions 6111.04,  6111.043, 6111.044  (Supp.
1983);
  (4) Rules of the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency,  Ohio Administra-
tive  Code,  sections  3745-34-01 through
34-41; 3745-9-01 through  9-11 (Director
Ohio EPA Order, June 18, 1984).
  (b) Other laws.  The following statutes
and  regulations, although  not incor-
porated by reference,  also are part of
the    approved    State-administered
program:
  (1) Ohio  Revised Code, Chapter 119
(1978 Replacement Part);
  (2) Ohio  Code Supplement, sections
6111.041, 6111.042, 6111.045 (Supp. 1982).
  (c) (1) The  Memorandum  of Agree-
ment between EPA  Region  V and the
Ohio Department of Natural Resources,
signed  by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on March  30, 1984:
  (2) Memorandum  of Agreement  be-
tween the Ohio Department of Natural
Resources and the Ohio Environmental
Protection  Agency,  Related  to  the
Underground  Injection  Control  Pro-
gram for the State of Ohio,  signed Au-
gust 1, 1984.
  (d) Statement of legal  authority. State-
ment from  Attorney  General of the
State of Ohio, by Senior Assistant At-
torney  General,  "Underground Injec-
tion Control Program—Attorney Gen-
eral's Statement," July 25, 1984.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials  submitted  as part  of
the original application  or  as supple-
ments thereto.

[49 FR 46897, Nov. 29, 1984]
                                    779

-------
§147.1802
                             40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§147.1802 Aquifer
    served]
exemptions.  [Re-
§147.1803  Existing  Class  I  and  III
    wells authorized by rule—maximum
    injection pressure.
  The owner or operator shall limit in-
jection pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating       requirements       of
§144.28(f)(3)(i); or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:

Pm = (0.8—0.433 Sg) d
where.
Pm = injection pressure at the well head in
  pounds per square inch
Sg  =  specific  gravity  of  injected  fluid
  (unitless)
d = injection depth in feet.
[49 FE 45308, Nov. 15, 1984]

§ 147.1805  EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on  Indian lands in the
State of  Ohio  is administered by EPA.
This program  consists of the UIC pro-
gram requirements  of 40 CPR parts 124,
144, 146, 148, and any additional require-
ments set forth  in the  remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators,  and  EPA shall comply  with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective  date. The  effective  date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Ohio is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43089, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9418, Mar. 6, 1991]

      Subpart LL—Oklahoma

§ 147.1850  State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class I, III, IV and V wells.
  The UIC program for Class I, III, IV,
and V wells in the State  of Oklahoma,
except those  on  Indian  lands,  is the
program   administered by  the Okla-
homa State Department of Health, ap-
proved by EPA pursuant to SDWA sec-
tion 1422. Notice of this  approval  was
published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on
June 24,  1982 (47 FR  27273). The effec-
tive date of this program  is July 24,
1982. This program  consists of the fol-
lowing elements, as submitted to  EPA
in the State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited  in this
paragraph are  hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Oklahoma. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of  the  Federal Register on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Oklahoma Statutes title  63 sec-
tions 1-901, 1-903 (1981);
  (2)  Oklahoma Controlled  Industrial
Waste Disposal Act,  Oklahoma Statute
Annotated  title 63  sections 1-2002, 1-
2014 (West Supp. 1983-1984);
  (3) Regulations. [Reserved]
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations, although  not  incor-
porated by reference except for select
sections identified in paragraph (a) of
this section, are also part of the  ap-
proved  State-administered  UIC  pro-
gram:
  (1)  Oklahoma  Open Meeting  Act,
Oklahoma Statutes title 25 sections 301
through 314 (Supp. 1978);
  (2)  Oklahoma  Statutes  Annotated
title 63 sections 1-101 to 1-114, 1-901 to
1-911, 1-1601 et  seq.,  1-1701, 1-2001 to 1-
2014 (West 1973 and Supp. 1982);
  (3)  Oklahoma  Statutes  Annotated
title 75 sections  301 to 327 (West 1976
and Supp. 1982).
  (c)  (1)  The Memorandum of Agree-
ment between EPA Region  VI and  the
Oklahoma State Department of Health,
signed by the EPA Regional  Adminis-
trator on April  13, 1982;
  (2)  Memorandum  of Understanding
between the Oklahoma State Depart-
ment of Health and the Oklahoma Cor-
poration Commission (OCC), signed by
members of  the OCC  on  February 12,
1982;
  (3)  Memorandum  of Understanding
between the Oklahoma State Depart-
ment of Health and  the Oklahoma  De-
partment  of Mines  (ODM),  signed by
the Deputy Chief Mine Inspector, ODM.
on February 15, 1982.
  (d) Statement of legal authority. Letter
from Attorney General of Oklahoma to
Commissioner  of Health.  Oklahoma
State  Department  of  Health,  "Re:
Statement  and Memorandum of Law
Concerning the Authority for the Okla-
homa State Department  of Health's
                                     780

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1900
Underground  Injection  Control  Pro-
gram," February 12, 1982.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984,  as amended at 53
FR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.1851  State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of Oklahoma, including the
lands of the Five Civilized  Tribes, but
not including  those  on  other  Indian
lands, is the program administered by
the Oklahoma Corporation Commission
approved by EPA pursuant to  SDWA
section  1425.  Notice  of this  approval
was published in the  FEDERAL  REG-
ISTER on December 2,  1981 (46 FR 58588).
This program consists of the following
elements, as submitted to EPA in the
State's program application:
  (a)  Incorporation by  reference.  [Re-
served]
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations,  although  not incor-
porated by reference, are also part of
the approved State-administered UIC
program:
  (1) Oklahoma Statutes, title 17 sec-
tions 51-53;  title 52  sections 86.1-86.5,
139-153, 243, 307-318.1 (1971).
  (2) OCC-OGR Rules No. 1-101-3-303.
  (c) (1) The  Memorandum of  Agree-
ment between EPA Region  VI and the
Oklahoma   Corporation  Commission,
signed by the EPA Regional  Adminis-
trator on April 13, 1981;
  (2) Letter from the Manager, Under-
ground  Injection  Control,  Oklahoma
Corporation Commission, to EPA,  June
18, 1981.
  (d)  Statement  of  legal  authority.
"Statement  of Legal  Authority of the
Oklahoma Corporation  Commission to
Conduct  an  Underground  Injection
Control Program," (Part IV, pages  30-41
of "State of Oklahoma Primacy Appli-
cation for Authority  to Regulate Class
II Injection  Wells," submitted April 14,
1981), signed by the  Conservation At-
torney,  Counsel to the Director and the
Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.1852 EPA-administered      pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
wells on Indian lands in Oklahoma, ex-
cept Class II wells on the lands of the
Five Civilized Tribes, is administered
by EPA. The UIC program for Class II
wells on  the Osage  Mineral  Reserve
consists of the requirements  set forth
in subpart GGG of  this part.  The UIC
program for  all other wells on Indian
lands consists of the requirements set
forth in subpart III of this part. Injec-
tion well owners and operators and
EPA shall comply with these require-
ments.
  (b) Effective date.  The effective  date
for UIC program for  Class II  wells on
the Osage Mineral Reserve is December
30, 1984. The  effective date for the UIC
program for  all other wells on Indian
lands is November 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988]

       Subpart MM—Oregon

§ 147.1900 State-administered      pro-
   gram.
  The UIC program for all classes  of
wells in the State of Oregon, except
those on Indian lands, is administered
by the Oregon Department of  Environ-
mental Quality, approved by EPA pur-
suant to section 1422 and section 1425 of
the SDWA. Notice of this approval was
published in  the FEDERAL REGISTER on
September 25, 1984; the effective date of
this  program is October  9, 1984. This
program consists of the following ele-
ments,  as  submitted  to  EPA  in the
State's program application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and  regulations  cited   in  this
paragraph are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Oregon. This incorporation
by reference was approved by the Di-
rector of the Federal Register effective
October 9, 1984.
  (1) Oregon Revised Statutes, Title 16,
chapter 164,  section  164.785;  Title 36,
                                    781

-------
§147.1901
          40 CFR Ch. I  (7-1-04 Edition)
chapter 468,  sections 468.005, 468.065 to
468.070, 468.700 to 468.815; Title 43, chap-
ter 520 sections 520.005, 520.095, 520.155—
520.330 (1983);
  (2)  Oregon  Administrative   Rules,
Chapter 340,  Division 44, sections 340-
44-005 through  340-44-055 (October 1983);
Chapter 340,  Division 45, sections 340-
45-005   through   340-45-075  (January
1990); Chapter 632, Division 10, sections
632-10-002 through 632-10-235 (May 1986);
Chapter 632,  Division 20, sections 632-
20-005 through 632-20-180 (May 1984).
  (V) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations,  although  not  incor-
porated by reference, also  are part of
the approved  State-administered  pro-
gram:
  (1) Oregon  Revised Statutes, Chapter
183  (1987);  192.420,  192.500,  459.460(3).
468.005  through   468.605,  and   468.780
through  468.997;  Chapters 516 and 522
(1983);
  (2)  Oregon  Administrative   Rules,
chapter 137, Div. 3 (July 1982); chapter
340, Div.  11  (April  1988); chapter 340,
Div. 12 (March 1989); chapter 340, Div. 14
(November 1983);  chapter 340, Div.  52
(November 1983);  chapter  632,  Div.  1
(June 1980); chapter 632, Div. 20  (Janu-
ary 1981).
  (c)(l)  The  Mf?norandum  of Agree-
ment between  EPA Region  X and the
Oregon  Department of Environmental
Quality,  signed by  the EPA Regional
Administrator  on May 3, 1984.
  (d)  Statement of legal  authority. (1)
"Underground  Injection  Control  Pro-
gram Legal Counsel's Statement," Oc-
tober 1983, signed by the Assistant At-
torney General. Oregon;
  (2) Opinion of the Attorney General,
Oregon, 35 Op. Attorney General 1042
(1972).
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials  submitted  as part  of
the original  application  or as supple-
ments thereto.
[49 FE 37594, Sept. 25. 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988; 56 FR 9418, Mar. 6,
1991]

§ 147.1901   EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program  for all
classes of wells on Indian lands  in the
State of  Oregon is administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements  of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth in the remainder
of this  subpart. Injection well owners
and  operators, and EPA shall  comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The  effective  date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Oregon is November 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended  at 56
FR 9419, Mar. 6, 1991]

    Subpart NN—Pennsylvania

§ 147.1950  State-administered      pro-
   gram. [Reserved]

§ 147.1951  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
State of Pennsylvania, including all In-
dian lands, is administered by EPA.
This program consists of the UIC  pro-
gram requirements of 40 CFR parts 124,
144. 146, 148, and any additional require-
ments  set forth in the remainder  of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective  date
for the UIC program on Indian lands is
November 25, 1988. The effective  date
for the UIC program  for  the  rest  of
Pennsylvania is June 25, 1984.
[53 FR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended  at 56
FR 9419, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.1952  Aquifer exemptions.
  (a)  This  section   identifies  any
aquifers  or their portions exempted in
accordance with §§144.7(b) and  146.4 of
this  chapter at the  time  of program
promulgation. EPA may in the  future
exempt  other aquifers or portions, ac-
cording to applicable procedures, with-
out codifying such exemptions in  this
section. An updated list of exemptions
will  be  maintained  in  the Regional
office.
  (b) Those portions of the following oil
bearing aquifers,  which would  other-
wise meet the definition of a  USDW,
are exempted in  accordance with the
provisions of §§144.7(b) and  146.4 of this
chapter for Class II enhanced recovery
injection activities only.
  (1) The Sugar Run and Bradford se-
ries of oil producing sands of the Brad-
ford  Field, in McKean County; includ-
ing the  Bradford,  West Branch, Stack,
                                     782

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.1954
Bennett Brook, Manila Brook, Brooder
Hollow, Cyclone, Minard Run, Minard
Run  School,  and   Sugar  Run  (or
Watsonville) Pools.
  (2) The Bradford Third oil producing
sand  of the Guffey Field in  McKean
County.
  (3)  The Bradford  series of  oil pro-
ducing sands of the Lewis Run Field in
McKean County.
  (4)  The Bradford  series of  oil pro-
ducing- sands of the Windfall Field and
Kings Run Pool in McKean County.
  (5)  The  Red Valley member of the
Second  Sand formation of the Venango
Group of oil producing  sands in the
Foster-Reno Field in Venango County;
including  the Foster,  Bully Hill, Vic-
tory,   Bredinsburg,   Egypt  Corners,
Reno, Monarch Park and Seneca Pools.
  (6) The Glade and  Clarendon oil pro-
ducing sands of the Morrison Run Field
and Elk Run Pool in  Warren County.
  (7) The Clarendon  and Glade oil pro-
ducing sands of the Clarendon Field in
Warren County.
  (8) The Bradford Third oil producing
sand in the  Shinglehouse Field, includ-
ing the Kings Run,  Janders Run and
Ceres Pools  in  Potter  and  McKean
Counties.

§147.1953  Existing Class I,  II (except
   enhanced recovery  and  hydro-
   carbon  storage)  and  III wells au-
   thorized by rule.
  Maximum   injection   pressure.   The
owner or operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating' requirements  of § 144.28(f)(3)
(i) or  (ii) as  applicable or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the  following' formula:
Pm=(0.733—0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=injection pressure  at  the well head in
  pounds per square inch
Sg=speciflc   gravity   of   injection  fluid
  (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.

§147.1954  Existing Class II enhanced
   recovery and hydrocarbon storage
   wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure. (1) To
meet  the  operating requirements  of
§ 144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap-
ter, the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall use an injection pressure no
greater than the  pressure established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional Administrator
shall establish such a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment,  and  opportunity for a  public
hearing, according to the provisions of
part 124, subpart A of this chapter,  and
will  inform owners and  operators in
writing  of  the applicable maximum
pressure; or
  (ii) May inject at pressures greater
than  those  specified  in  paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for the field or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits a request in writing
to the  Regional  Administrator,   and
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Regional Administrator that  such in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement of §144.28(f)(3)(ii)  (A)   and
(B).  The Regional Administrator may
grant such a request after notice,  op-
portunity  for  comment,  and  oppor-
tunity for a public hearing, according
to the provisions of part 124, subpart A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such  time as the Regional
Administrator  establishes rules  for
maximum injection  pressure based on
data provided pursuant to paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)  of this section the owner or
operator shall:
  (i)   Limit injection  pressure  to a
value which will not exceed the oper-
ating requirements  of  §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii) Submit  data acceptable to  the
Regional Administrator which defines
the fracture pressure of the formation
in which  injection is taking  place. A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two  or  more operators conducting
operations in  the  same formation, if
the Regional  Administrator approves
such submission. The information shall
be submitted to the Regional Adminis-
trator within one year of the  effective
date of this regulation.
  (b) Casing and cementing. Where  the
Regional   Administrator  determines
that  the owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced recovery or hydrocarbon
storage  well may not be in compliance
with the requirements of §§ 144.28(e)  and
146.22, the owner or operator shall com-
ply with paragraphs (b) (1) through (4)
                                    783

-------
§147.1955
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of this  section,  when  required by  the
Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface casing1 by recir-
culating the  cement  to the  surface
from a  point 50 feet below  the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all  USDWs  by placing
cement between the outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (iii)   For  wells   as  described   in
§146.8(b)(3)(ii), installing a smaller di-
ameter  pipe inside the existing injec-
tion tubing and setting it on an appro-
priate packer; and
  (2) Isolate any injection zones by
placing sufficient cement to  fill  the
calculated  space between the  casing
and  the well  bore  to  a point 50 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant to  deteriora-
tion  from  formation  and injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the  calculated volume necessary to
cement off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator may
specify  other requirements in addition
to or in lieu  of  the requirements set
forth in paragraphs (b) (1) through (3)
of this section  as needed  to protect
USDWs.

§ 147.1955  Requirements for wells au-
    thorized by permit.
  (a) The owner or operator of a Class
I well  authorized by permit shall in-
stall or shall ensure that the well has:
  (1) Surface casing present;
  (i) Extending from the surface  to  a
depth at least 50 feet below  the base of
the lowermost USDW; and
  (ii) Cemented back to the surface by
recirculating the cement; and
  (2) Long string casing and  tubing;
  (i) Extending  to  the injection zone:
and
  (ii) Cemented  back to 50  feet above
the  base of the next largest casing
string.
  (b) The owner  or  operator of a new
Class  II  well authorized  by permit
shall.
  (1) Install  surface  casing  from  the
surface  to at least 50 feet below  the
base of the lowermost USDW.
  (2) Cement the casing  by recircu-
lating to the  surface or by using; no less
than 120% of the calculated annular
volume.
  (3) For new enhanced recovery wells,
install tubing or long string casing ex-
tending to the injection zone.
  (4) For new salt water disposal wells,
install long  string casing and tubing
extending to  the injection zone.
  (5) Isolate any injection zone by plac-
ing sufficient cement to fill the cal-
culated volume to a point 50 feet above
the injection  zone.
  (c) The  Regional Administrator may
specify  casing and cementing require-
ments other  than those listed in para-
graphs (a) and (b) of  this section on a
case by case  basis as  conditions of the
permit.

    Subpart OO—Rhode Island

§ 147.2000  State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class  I,  II, III, IV, and V
    wells.
  The UIC program for  all classes of
wells in Rhode Island, except those on
Indian lands, is  the program adminis-
tered by the  Rhode Island Department
of  Environmental  Management,  ap-
proved by EPA pursuant to section 1422
of the  SDWA. Notice of this approval
was published in the FEDERAL  REG-
ISTER on  August 1, 1984;  the effective
date of this program is August 15, 1984.
This program consists of  the following
elements, as  submitted to EPA in  the
State's program application.
  (a) Incorporation by  reference.  The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited in  this
paragraph are hereby incorporated  by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the  SDWA for
the State of  Rhode Island. This incor-
poration by reference was approved by
the Director  of the Federal Register ef-
fective August 15, 1984.
  (1) Rhode Island Gen. Laws sections
46-12-1,   46-12-5,  and  46-12-28  (Supp.
1983);
  (2) "Underground  Injection  Control
Program Rules and Regulations." State
of Rhode Island and Providence Planta-
tions Department  of Environmental
                                    784

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2050
Management.  Division of Water Re-
sources (as received by the Secretary of
State, May 21, 1984).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations  although not  incor-
porated by reference,  also are part  of
the approved  State-administered pro-
gram:
  (1) Rhode Island General Laws, Sec-
tion 10-20-1 et seq.,  entitled "State En-
vironmental Rights";
  (2) Rhode Island General Laws, Sec-
tion 23-19.1-1  et seq., entitled  "Haz-
ardous Waste Management";
  (3) Rhode Island General Laws, Sec-
tion 42-17.1 et seq.,  entitled "Depart-
ment of Environmental Management";
  (4) Rhode Island General Laws, Sec-
tion 42-35-1 et seq.,  entitled "Adminis-
trative Procedures";
  (5) Rhode Island General Laws, Sec-
tion  46-12-1  et  seq.,  entitled "Water
Pollution";
  (6)  Hazardous  Waste  Management
Facility Operating  Permit Rules and
Regulations—Landfills, at last amend-
ed November  2,  1981  (hereinafter re-
ferred to as the "Hazardous Waste Reg-
ulation");
  (7)  Water Quality Regulations for
Water Pollution Control, effective No-
vember 19,1981; and
  (8) Administrative Rules of Practices
and Procedure for Department of Envi-
ronmental Management, effective No-
vember 12, 1980.
  (c)  (1) The  Memorandum of Agree-
ment between EPA  Region I and the
Rhode Island  Department of Environ-
mental  Management,  signed by the
EPA Regional  Administrator  on March
29, 1984;
  (2) Letter from Director, Rhode Is-
land  Department  of Environmental
Management,  to  Regional  Adminis-
trator. EPA Region I, amending Sec-
tion III,  C of  the Memorandum  of
Agreement, April 25, 1984.
  (d) Statement of legal authority. Letter
from Attorney General, State of Rhode
Island and Providence Plantations,  to
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1,
"Re:   Attorney  General's  Statement,
Underground  Injection Control  Pro-
gram," January 17, 1984.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part  of
the original  application or as supple-
ments thereto.

[49 FR 30699, Aug. 1, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43090, Oct. 25, 19881

§ 147.2001  EPA-administered     pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State of Rhode Island is administered
by EPA. This program consists of the
UIC  program requirements of 40 CFR
parts 124, 144, 146, 148, and any addi-
tional requirements set forth in the re-
mainder of this subpart. Injection well
owners  and operators, and EPA shall
comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Rhode Island is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9419, Mar. 6, 19911

    Subpart PP—South Carolina

§ 147.2050  State-administered     pro-
   gram.
  The UIC program for all classes of
wells in the  State of South Carolina,
except for those on Indian lands, is the
program administered  by  the  South
Carolina Department of Health and En-
vironmental Control, approved by EPA
pursuant to section 1422 of the SDWA.
Notice of this approval was published
in the FEDERAL REGISTER  on  July 10,
1984; the effective date of this  program
is July 24, 1984. This program consists
of the following elements, as submitted
to  EPA  in the  State's   program
application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes  and regulations  cited  in this
paragraph are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of South Carolina.  This  in-
corporation by reference was approved
by the Director of the Federal  Register
effective July 24, 1984.
  (1) Pollution Control Act, S.C. Code
Ann. Sections 48-1-10, 48-1-90,  48-1-100,
48-1-110 (Law. Co-op.  1976  and Supp.
1983).
  (2)  South  Carolina  Department of
Health  and  Environmental  Control,
                                    785

-------
§147.2051
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Ground-Water Protection Division, Un-
derground  Injection  Control  Regula-
tions, R-61-87, Effective  Date: June 24,
1983 Published in South Carolina State
Register, Volume 7, Issue  6; Amended
Date: March 23, 1984, as amended by no-
tice in South Carolina State Register,
Volume 8, Issue 3.
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations  although  not incor-
porated by reference,  also are part of
the approved State-Administered pro-
gram:
  (1) Pollution Control Act, S.C.  Code
Ann. Sections 48-1-10 to 48-1-350 (Law.
Co-op. 1976 and Supp. 1983).
  (2) State Safe  Drinking Water Act,
S.C. Code Ann. Sections 44-55-10 to 44-
55-100 (Law. Co-op. 1976 and Supp. 1983).
  (3)  Administrative Procedures  Act,
S.C. Code Ann. Sections 1-23-10 et seq.,
and 1-23-310  to  1-23-400 (Law.  Co-op.
1976 and Supp. 1983).
  (4) S.C. Code  Ann. Sections 15-5-20,
15-5-200 (Law.  Co-op.  1976  and  Supp.
1983).
  (c)(l)  The  Memorandum of  Agree-
ment  between EPA Region  IV  and the
South Carolina  Department of  Health
and Environmental  Control signed by
the EPA Regional  Administrator  on
May 29,  1984.
  (d)  Statement  of legal authority.  (1)
"Underground Injection Control  Pro-
gram,  Attorney  General's  Statement
for Class I, II, III, IV  and VA  and VB
Wells," signed by the Attorney  General
of South Carolina on April 27, 1984.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials  submitted as  part of
the original  application or as supple-
ments thereto.

[49 PR 28058, July 10, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.2051  EPA-administered      pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells  on Indian lands in the
State of Rhode  Island is administered
by EPA. This program consists of the
UIC program requirements of 40  CPR
parts 124,  144,  146, 148,  and any  addi-
tional requirements set forth in the re-
mainder of this  subpart. Injection well
owners  and operators,  and EPA  shall
comply with  these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
South Carolina is November 25, 1988.
[53 PR 43090, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at, 56
FR 9419, Mar. 6, 1991]

    Subpart QQ—South Dakota

§ 147.2100  State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the  State of  South  Dakota,  except
those on Indian lands,  is the program
administered by the  South Dakota De-
partment of Water  and Natural Re-
sources, approved by EPA pursuant to
section  1425  of the  SDWA.  Notice  of
this approval was published in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER on October 24, 1984; the
effective date  of this  program  is De-
cember  7, 1984. This program consists
of the following elements, as submitted
to  EPA   in   the  State's  program
application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and  regulations  cited in this
paragraph are  hereby  incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of South Dakota. This incor-
poration by reference was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register ef-
fective December 7, 1984.
  (1) South Dakota Codified Laws, sec-
tions 45-9-2, 45-9-4, 45-9-11,  45-19-13, 45-
9-14, 45-9-15 (1983).
  (2) Administrative Rules  of  South
Dakota,   sections   74:10:02  through
74:10:07, 74:10:09, and 74:10:11 published
by  the  South  Dakota Code  Commis-
sion, as revised through October 4, 1987.
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations, although  not  incor-
porated by reference,  also are part of
the    approved    State-administered
program:
  (1)  South  Dakota  Codified   Laws,
Chapter 45-9 (sections  not cited above)
(1983); 1-26 (1981).
  (c)(l)  The  Memorandum of  Agree-
ment between EPA Region VIII and the
South  Dakota Department of  Water
and Natural  Resources, signed  by the
EPA Regional  Administrator on July
18, 1984.
                                     786

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2103
  (d)  Statement  of legal  authority.  (1)
"Underground Injection  Control Pro-
gram for Class II Wells: Attorney Gen-
eral's Statement," signed by Mark V.
Meierhery,  Attorney  General,  South
Dakota, on January 16, 1984.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the original application  or as supple-
ments thereto.

[50 FR 7061, Feb. 20, 1985, as amended at 56
FR 9419, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.2101  EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Class I, III, IV and V wells
    and all wells on Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program  for all
Class I, III, IV,  and V wells, including
those on Indian lands, and for Class II
wells on Indian lands in  the  state of
South Dakota is administered by EPA.
This program consists of the UIC pro-
gram requirements of 40 CFR parts 124,
144, 146, 148, and any additional require-
ments set forth in the  remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b)  Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Class I, III, IV
and V wells  on  all lands in South Da-
kota, including Indian lands,  and  for
Class II wells on Indian lands only, is
December 30, 1984.

[52 FR 17682, May  11, 1987, as amended at 56
FR 9419, Mar  6, 1991]

§ 147.2102  Aquifer exemptions.
  (a)  This  section  identifies   any
aquifers or their portions exempted in
accordance  with §§144.7(b) and 146.4 of
this chapter at the time of program
promulgation. EPA may  in the  future
exempt  other  aquifers  or their por-
tions, according to applicable  proce-
dures, without codifying such exemp-
tions in this section. An updated list of
exemptions  will be maintained in the
Regional office.
  (b) Those  portions of all aquifers lo-
cated on Indian  Lands, which meet the
definition of USDW and into which ex-
isting Class II wells are injecting, are
exempted within a Vi mile radius of the
well for the  purpose of Class II injec-
tion activities only.

[49 FR 45308, Nov. 15, 1984]
§147.2103  Existing  Class  II enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage
    wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure.  (1) To
meet the  operating  requirements of
§144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B)  of this chap-
ter, the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall use an injection pressure no
greater than  the  pressure established
by  the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall establish such a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ments,  and opportunity for a  public
hearings, according to the  provisions of
part 124, subpart A of this chapter, and
will inform owners and  operators in
writing  of the applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (ii) May inject at a pressure greater
than  those   specified  in  paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for the field or
formation in which he is operating pro-
vided he submits a request in writing
to  the  Regional  Administrator,  and
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Regional  Administrator that such  in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement of §144.28(f)(3)(ii)(A) and (B).
The Regional Administrator may grant
such  a  request  after notice,   oppor-
tunity for comment,  and opportunity
for a public hearing, according  to the
provisions of part 124, subpart A of this
chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as  the Regional
Administrator  establishes field  rules
for maximum injection pressure based
on  data provided  pursuant  to  para-
graph  (a)(2)(ii) of  this  section  the
owner or operator shall:
  (i)  Limit  injection  pressure   to  a
value which will not exceed the oper-
ating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii) Submit to the Regional Adminis-
trator data acceptable to the Regional
administrator which defines  the frac-
ture pressure of the formation in which
injection is taking place. A single test
may be submitted on  behalf of two or
more operators conducting operations
in the same formation, if the Regional
Administrator  approves such  submis-
sion.
  (b) Casing and cementing. Where the
Regional   Administrator   determines
                                     787

-------
§147.2104
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
that the owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced recovery or hydrocarbon
storage well may not be in compliance
with the requirement of §§ 144.28(e) and
146.22, the owner or operator shall when
required  by the  Regional   Adminis-
trator:
  (1) Protect TJSDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface casing by recir-
culating  the  cement  to the surface
from a  point 50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all USDWs by placing
cement between the outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2) Isolate any  injection  zones  by
placing sufficient  cement to  fill the
calculated space  between the  casing
and the  well bore  to a  point 250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the  maximum  operation
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant to  deteriora-
tion from  formation   and   injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the  calculated volume necessary  to
cement off a zone; and/or
  (4) Comply with  other requirements
which the Regional Administrator may
specify  in addition to or in lieu of the
requirements set  forth  in paragraphs
(b)  (1)  through  (3) of this  section  as
needed to protect USDWs.
[49 PR 45308, Nov  15, 1984]

§ 147.2104 Requirements for all wells.
  (a) The owner or operator converting
an existing well to an  injection well
shall check the condition of the casing
with one of the following logging tools;
  (1) A pipe analysis log;  or
  (2) A caliper log.
  (b) The owner or operator  of a new
injection well cased with plastic (PVC,
ABS, or others) casings shall:
  (1) Not  construct a well deeper  than
500 feet:
  (2) Use cement and additives compat-
ible with such casing material; and
  (3) Cement the annular space above
the injection intermal from the bottom
of the blank casing to the surface.
  (c) The owner or operator of a newly
drilled well shall install  centralizers as
directed  by the   Regional   Adminis-
trator.
  (d) The owner or operator shall as re-
quired by the Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i)  Setting  surface casing  50 feet
below the lowermost USDW;
  (ii) Cementing surface casing by re-
circulating the cement to the surface
from a point 50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (iii) Isolating all USDWs by placing
cement between the  outermost casing
and the well bore; and
  (2) Isolate  any  injection  zones by
placing sufficient cement to  fill  the
calculated space between the  casing
and  the well bore to a point  250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the maximum operating
pressure; and
  (ii) Which is resistant to  deteriora-
tion  from  formation  and  injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the calculated volume  necessary to
cement off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator may
approve alternate  casing  and cement-
ing practices provided that the  owner
or  operator  demonstrates  that  such
practices   will  adequately   protect
USDWs.
  (e) Area of review. Notwithstanding
the alternatives presented in §146.6 of
this chapter, the area of review shall be
a fixed radius as described in §146.6(b)
of this chapter.
  (f) The applicant must give separate
notice of  intent to apply  for a permit
to each  owner of record of the land
within one-quarter  mile  of the site.
The addresses of those to  whom notice
is given and the description of how no-
tice was given shall be submitted with
the  permit  application.   The  notice
shall include:
  (1) The  name and  address of  appli-
cant;
  (2) A brief description of the  planned
injection  activities,  including  well lo-
cation, name and depth of the injection
zone, maximum injection  pressure and
volume, and fluid to be injected;
  (3) The EPA contact person; and
  (4) A statement  that opportunity to
comment  will be announced after EPA
prepares a draft permit.
                                     788

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2154
This requirement may be waived by the
Regional  Administrator  if  he  deter-
mines that individual notice to all land
owners of record would be impractical.
[49 FR 45308, Nov. 15, 1984]

      Subpart RR—Tennessee

§ 147.2150  State-administered     pro-
    gram. [Reserved]

§ 147.2151  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
State of  Tennessee,  including  all In-
dian  lands, is administered  by EPA.
This program consists of the UIC pro-
gram requirements of 40 CFR parts 124,
144, 146, 148, and any additional require-
ments set forth in the  remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. Effective date for
the UIC program on Indian lands is No-
vember 25, 1988. The effective date for
the UIC  program for  the rest of Ten-
nessee is June 25, 1984.

[53 FR 43090, Oct. 25,  1988, as amended at 56
FR 9419, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.2152  Aquifer   exemptions.  [Re-
    served]

§147.2153  Existing Class I,  II  (except
    enhanced   recovery  and  hydro-
    carbon storage) and  III wells au-
    thorized by rule.
  Maximum  injection  pressure.  The
owner or  operator shall limit injection
pressure to the lesser of:
  (a) A value which will not exceed the
operating requirements of §144.28(f)(3)
(i) or (ii) as applicable or
  (b) A value for well head pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:

Pm=(0.600- 0.433 Sg)d
where:
Pm=injection pressure at the well  head in
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific gravity of inject fluid (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.

§147.2154  Existing Class II enhanced
    recovery and hydrocarbon storage
    wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Maximum injection pressure. (1)  To
meet the  operating  requirements  of
§144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A) and (B) of this chap-
ter, the owner or operator:
  (i) Shall use an injection pressure no
greater than the  pressure  established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall establish such a maximum pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment,  and  opportunity  for  a  public
hearing,  according to the provisions of
part 124, subpart A of this chapter, and
will inform  owners and operators  in
writing  of  the applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (ii) May  inject  at  pressures  greater
than   those  specified  in   paragraph
(a)(l)(i) of this section for the field  or
formation  in which he  is  operating,
provided he submits a request in writ-
ing to the Regional  Administrator and
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Regional Administrator that such  in-
jection pressure will not violate the re-
quirement  of  §144.28(f)(3)(ii) (A)  and
(B).  The Regional Administrator may
grant such a request after notice, op-
portunity  for  comment,  and   oppor-
tunity for  a  public hearing, according
to the provisions of part 124, subpart A
of this chapter.
  (2) Prior to such time as the Regional
Administrator  establishes  rules  for
maximum injection  pressure based on
data  provided  pursuant  to  paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)  of this section the owner  or
operator shall:
  (i)  Limit  injection  pressure  to  a
value which  will not exceed the oper-
ating  requirements  of §144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii) Submit data  acceptable  to the
Regional Administrator which  defines
the fracture  pressure of the formation
in which injection is taking place.  A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two or  more  operators  conducting
operations  in the same  formation,  if
the  Regional Administrator approves
such submission. The data shall be sub-
mitted to the Regional Administrator
within one year of the effective date of
this regulation.
  (b) Casing and  cementing. Where the
Regional   Administrator   determines
that the owner or operator of an exist-
ing enhanced recovery or hydrocarbon
storage well may not be in compliance
with the requirements of §§ 144.28(e) and
146.22,  the owner or operator shall com-
ply with paragraphs (b) (1)  through (4)
                                     789

-------
§147.2155
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of this  section, when  required by the
Regional Administrator:
  (1) Protect USDWs by:
  (i) Cementing surface casing by recir-
culating the  cement  to  the surface
from a  point 50 feet below the lower-
most USDW; or
  (ii) Isolating all  USDWs by placing
cement  between the outermost casing
and the  well bore; and
  (2) Isolate any injection zones  by
placing  sufficient cement  to  fill  the
calculated  space between  the  casing
and  the well bore to  a  point 250 feet
above the injection zone; and
  (3) Use cement:
  (i) Of  sufficient quantity and quality
to withstand the maximum operating
pressure;
  (ii) Which is resistant to deteriora-
tion from  formation   and  injection
fluids; and
  (iii) In a quantity no less than 120%
of the calculated volume necessary to
cement  off a zone.
  (4) The Regional Administrator may
specify  other requirements in addition
to or in lieu  of the requirements set
forth in paragraphs  (b) (1)  through  (3)
of this  section, as needed to protect
USDWs.

§ 147.2155   Requirements for all wells—
    area of review.
  Notwithstanding   the   alternatives
presented in §146.6 of this chapter, the
area of review shall  be  a minimum
fixed radius as described in §146.6(b) of
this chapter.

         Subpart SS—Texas

§ 147.2200   State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class I, III, IV, and V wells.
  The UIC  program for Class I, III, IV,
and  V wells in the State of Texas, ex-
cept for those wells on Indian  lands,
Class III brine mining wells, and cer-
tain Class  V wells, is the program ad-
ministered by  the  Texas  Commission
on Environmental Quality approved by
EPA pursuant to section 1422  of the
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). No-
tice of the  original approval for Class I,
III, IV,  and V wells was published in
the  FEDERAL REGISTER  on January 6,
1982 and became effective February 7,
1982. Class V  geothermal wells and
wells for the in situ combustion of coal
are regulated by the Rail Road Com-
mission of Texas under a separate UIC
program approved  by  EPA  and  pub-
lished  in the  FEDERAL REGISTER  on
April 23, 1982. A subsequent program re-
vision  application for Class  I, III, IV,
and  V  wells,  not including Class III
brine mining  wells, was approved  by
the EPA  pursuant to  section 1422  of
SDWA. Notice  of  this approval was
published in the FEDERAL REGISTER  on
February 25, 2004; the effective date of
these programs  is March 26, 2004. The
program for  Class I,  III, IV,  and V
wells,  not including  Class  HI  brine
mining wells, consists of the following
elements as submitted to the  EPA in
the  State's revised program applica-
tions.  The UIC  program for Class III
brine  mining wells in the State  of
Texas, except for those wells on Indian
lands,  is the  program administered by
the Railroad Commission  of Texas. A
program revision application for Class
III brine mining wells was submitted
by Texas and approved by EPA. Notice
of that approval was published in the
FEDERAL  REGISTER  on February 26,
2004; the effective date of this program
is March 29, 2004.
  (a) Incorporation by  reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph  are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made part of the applicable
UIC  program  under  SDWA for the
State of Texas.  This  incorporation  by
reference was approved  by the Director
of the Federal Register in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part  51.
Copies of the materials that  are incor-
porated by reference in this paragraph
are available at EPA Region VI, 1445
Ross Avenue, Dallas,  TX 75202 or from
the National Archives and Records Ad-
ministration  (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material  at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of_Jederal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html..
  (1) Texas Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements Applicable to the Under-
ground Injection Control Program for
Class I, III, IV, and V Wells,  except for
Class III  Brine Mining Wells,  March
2002.
                                     790

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2201
  (2) Texas Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements Applicable to the Under-
ground Injection Control  Program  for
Class  III Brine Mining Wells, March
2002.
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations, as effective on March
31,  2002, although not incorporated by
reference  except  for any  provisions
identified in paragraph (a) of this sec-
tion,  are  also  part  of the  approved
State-administered UIC program.
  (1) Class I,  III,  IV,  and  V wells,  (i)
Title  30 of the Texas Administrative
Code Chapters 39, 50, 55, 80, and 281.
  (ii) Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated,
Water Code, Chapters 5,  7, 26, and  32,
Health and Safety  Code  Section 361,
Government Code  (ORA)  Chapter  552
and Government Code (APA)  Chapter
2001.
  (2)  Class  III brine mining  wells,  (i)
Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated, Nat-
ural Resources Code, Chapters 91, 2001,
and 331;
  (ii) Vernon's Texas Codes Annotated,
Government Code  Title  10,  Chapters
2001, 552, and 311.
  (iii)  General Rules  of  Practice and
Procedure before the Railroad Commis-
sion of Texas.
  (c)   Memorandum  of  Agreement—(1)
Class I, III, IV, and V wells. The Memo-
randum  of Agreement  between  EPA
Region VI and the Texas Natural Re-
source  Conservation  Commission  a
predecessor to the Texas Commission
on  Environmental Quality  (TCEQ),  re-
vised  March 23, 1999, and signed by the
EPA Regional Administrator on Octo-
ber 23, 2001.
  (2) Class III brine mining wells. The
Memorandum of  Agreement  between
EPA Region VI and the Railroad Com-
mission  of Texas signed by  the  EPA
Regional Administrator on October 23,
2001.
  (d)  Statement  of legal  authority—(1)
Class  I, III, IV,  and V wells. "State of
Texas   Office  of  Attorney  General
Statement for Class  I, III, IV, and V
Underground Injections Wells," signed
by the Attorney General of Texas, June
30, 1998.
  (2) Class  III brine mining  wells. State
of  Texas "Attorney  General's State-
ment"  for Class III Brine Mining Injec-
tion Wells,  signed  by  the Attorney
General of Texas,  February 2, 1992 and
the "Supplement to Attorney General's
Statement of February 19, 1992," signed
by the Attorney General of Texas, June
2, 1998.
  (e)  Program Description—(1)  Class  I,
III, IV, and V wells. The Program De-
scription and any other materials sub-
mitted as part of the revision applica-
tion or as supplements thereto.
  (2)  Class III  brine mining wells. The
Program  Description  and any  other
materials submitted as part of the revi-
sion  application  or  as  supplements
thereto.

[69 FR 8568, Feb. 25, 2004, as amended at  69
FR 8828, Feb. 26, 2004]

§ 147.2201   State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class II •wells
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the  State  of Texas, except for those
wells on Indian lands,  is the program
administered by the Railroad Commis-
sion of Texas, approved by EPA pursu-
ant to section 1425 of the SDWA. Notice
of this approval was published in the
FEDERAL REGISTER on  April 23, 1982 (47
FR 17488).  The  effective date of this
program was May 23,  1982.  This pro-
gram  consists  of the  following ele-
ments,  as  submitted  to EPA  in the
State's program application:
  (a)  Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes  and  regulations   cited  in this
paragraph  are hereby  incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of  Texas. This incorporation
by reference  was  approved by the Di-
rector of the Federal Register on June
25, 1984.
  (1)  Injection  Well Act, Texas Water
Code  Annotated  sections  27.031 and
27.033 (Vernon Supp. 1984);
  (2) Texas Natural Resources Code An-
notated sections  85.041, 85.045,  85.046
and 85.052 (Vernon 1978 and Supp. 1982);
  (3)  Rules Having Statewide  General
Application  to  Oil,  Gas, and  Geo-
thermal Resource Operations,  sections
.051.02.02,000  to  .051.02.02.080 (Railroad
Commission of Texas, Oil and Gas Divi-
sion,  Revised 12-22-81), amended as fol-
lows:
  (i) Amendment to 16 TAG section 3.9
(section .051.02.02.009) issued December
21,1981, effective April  1,1982;
                                     791
      203-160 D-26

-------
§147.2205
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (ii) Amendment to  16  TAC section
3.46  (section  .051.02.02.046) issued De-
cember 21,1981, effective April 1,1982.
  (iii)  Amendment to  16  TAC section
3.71  (section  .051.02.02.074) issued De-
cember 21, 1981, effective April 1. 1982.
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations, although  not incor-
porated by reference,  are also part of
the  approved State-administered UIC
program:
  (1) Texas Water Code, Chapters 26, 27
and 29 (Vernon 1972 and Supp. 1982);
  (2)  Texas  Natural  Resources  Code,
Chapters 81,  85-89, 91  and 141 (Vernon
1978 and Supp. 1982):
  (3)  General Rules  of Practice and
Procedure, Subchapters A-J (Railroad
Commission  of Texas,  adopted Novem-
ber 24, 1975, revised December 1980).
  (c)(l) The  Memorandum  of  Agree-
ment between EPA Region VI and the
Railroad Commission  of Texas, signed
by the EPA Regional Administrator  on
March 24, 1982.
  (2) Letter  from Director of Under-
ground Injection  Control,   Railroad
Commission of Texas, to Chief, Ground
Water Protection Section, EPA Region
VI, "Re:  Letter of Clarification—UIC
Program Application," March 21, 1982.
  (d)   Statement   of   legal   authority.
"Statement of Legal Authority of the
Railroad Commission of Texas to con-
duct the Underground Injection Con-
trol Program," signed by Special Coun-
sel, Railroad Commission of Texas,  as
submitted with "State of Texas Under-
ground Injection Control  Program Ap-
plication for  Primacy Enforcement Au-
thority,"  prepared by  the  Railroad
Commission of Texas, January 15, 1982.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other  materials submitted  as part  of
the  application  or   as  supplements
thereto.
[49 FR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43091, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.2205  EPA-administered     pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State of Texas is administered by EPA.
This program consists of the  UIC pro-
gram requirements of 40 CPR parts 124,
144, 146, 148, and any additional require-
ments set  forth in  the remainder  of
this subpart.  Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The  effective date
for the Indian lands program for the
State of Texas is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43091, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9419, Mar. 6, 1991]

         Subpart H—Utah

§ 147.2250 State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class I, III, IV, and V wells.
  The UIC program for Class I, III, IV,
and V  wells  in the State of Utah, ex-
cept those on Indian lands, is adminis-
tered  by the Utah  Department  of
Health,  Division  of Environmental
Health, approved by EPA pursuant to
Section 1422  of  the SDWA.  Notice of
this approval was published in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER on January 9, 1983 (47
FR 2321). The effective date of this pro-
gram is February 10, 1983. Changes to
Utah's  regulations for  Class  I  wells
were made on May 15, 1990, in response
to  modification  of  national  rules as
promulgated  by 53 FR  28188, July 26,
1988. Utah's  rules were  effective  July
20, 1990. The revised rules, Program De-
scription, Attorney  General's state-
ment, and Memorandum of Agreement
were approved as a minor  program
modification  on  October 3, 1990.  This
program consists of the  following ele-
ments as submitted to EPA:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State  stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby  incorporated by ref-
erence  and made  a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Utah. This incorporation
by  reference  was approved by the Di-
rector  of the Federal Register on June
25, 1984.
  (1) Utah  Water Pollution  Control
Act, Utah  Code  Annotated, Title 26,
Chapter 11, Sections 2, 8, and 10 (1989);
  (2) Underground Injection  Control
Regulations;   Utah   Administrative
Code, Section R448-7 (effective  as of
January 2, 1990);
  (3) Underground Injection  Control
Program (adopted January 20, 1982 and
revised effective  July 20, 1990)  (Offi-
cially submitted to EPA by the Execu-
tive Secretary of Utah Water Pollution
Control Committee on August 16, 1990).
                                    792

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2251
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations, although  not incor-
porated  by reference except  for  se-
lected sections identified in paragraph
(a) of this section, are also part of the
approved State-administered program:
  (1) Utah Pollution Control Act, Utah
Code   Annotated,   Sections  26-11-1
through -20 (Supp. 1990);
  (c)(l) The  revised  Memorandum  of
Agreement between EPA, Region VIII
and the  Utah  Department  of  Health,
Division . of  Environmental   Health,
signed by the Regional Administrator
on October 3, 1990.
  (2) Letter from Director, Utah De-
partment of Health, Division of  Envi-
ronmental Health,  Bureau of Water
Pollution Control, to EPA Region VIII,
Re:  Underground  Injection   Control
Program—Utah, March 15, 1982;
  (3) Letter from the Executive Sec-
retary of the  Utah  Water  Pollution
Control  Committee  to  EPA  Region
VIII, "Re: Utah UIC Class I Well Pro-
gram Changes," August 16, 1990;
  (d)  Statement  of  legal  authority.  (1)
"Underground  Injection  Control Pro-
gram—Attorney General's statement,"
signed by Attorney General, State  of
Utah, January, 1982;
  (2) Letter from Assistant Attorney
General  of  Utah to Chief,  Drinking
Water Branch,  EPA Region  VIII, June
18,1982;
  (3) Addendum to Underground Injec-
tion Control Program, Attorney Gen-
eral's  Statement signed  by Attorney
General of Utah, August 10,1990.
  (e) The Program Description (revised
June 19,  1990) and any other materials
submitted as part of the application or
supplements thereto.
[56 FR 9419, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.2251 State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of Utah, except those on In-
dian lands,  is  the program adminis-
tered by the Utah Department  of Nat-
ural Resources, Division  of  Oil, Gas,
and Mining, approved by EPA pursuant
to section 1425 of the SDWA. Notice  of
this approval was published in the FED-
ERAL REGISTER on  October  8, 1982 (47
FR 44561); the effective date of this pro-
gram is November 7, 1982. This program
consists of the following  elements, as
submitted  to EPA  in the State's pro-
gram application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited  in  this
paragraph  are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Utah.  This incorporation
by reference was approved by the  Di-
rector of the Federal Register on June
25, 1984.
  (1) Utah  Code Annotated, 1953, sec-
tion 40-6-1  through  40-6-18, as amended
1988 and Cumm. Supp. 1990;
  (2)  The  Oil  and  Gas Conservation
General  Rules, adopted under the  au-
thority of the Oil and Gas Conservation
Act, 40-6-1  et seq.,  Utah Code  Anno-
tated,  as amended 1988  (revised March
1989),  rules R615-1 through R615-4, and
R615-8 through R615-10.
  (b) Other laws. [Reserved]
  (c)(l) The  Memorandum  of Agree-
ment between  EPA, Region VIII and
the Utah Department  of Natural Re-
sources,  Division of Oil, Gas, and Min-
ing and the Board of Oil, Gas and Min-
ing,   signed  by  the  EPA  Regional
Administrator on July 19, 1983;
  (2) Letter from Director, Division of
Oil, Gas  and Mining, Utah Department
of Natural Resources and Energy, to
Regional Administrator, EPA Region
VIII, "Re: Aquifer Exemption Process,"
June 16,1982;
  (3) "Memorandum  of Understanding"
between  Utah  Department  of Health
and Utah Department of Natural Re-
sources, dated March 5,1981;
  (4) "Second  Addition  to Agreement
between  the Department of Health and
the Department of Natural  Resources
and Energy," dated December 15, 1981.
  (d)  Statement of  legal authority.  (1)
Part III of "Primacy Application—Class
II Underground  Injection Wells," con-
sisting of "Synopsis of Pertinent  Stat-
utes and Regulations,"  "Statement of
Legal Authority," and "Certification by
the Attorney  General," by Assistant
Attorney General, Department of Nat-
ural Resources and Energy, dated De-
cember 18, 1981;
  (2) Letter from  Assistant Attorney
General,  State of Utah, to EPA Region
VIH, undated, received in the  EPA  Of-
fice of Regional Counsel June 10,1982.
                                    793

-------
§147.2253
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (3) Memorandum to Director, Divi-
sion of Oil, Gas and Mining from  As-
sistant Attorney General regarding Un-
derground  Injection Control Program,
January 8,1985.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other  materials submitted as  part of
the application or  amendments there-
to.
[49 FR  20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43091, Oct. 25,  1988;  56 FR 9420, Mar. 6,
1991]

§ 147.2253  EPA-administered      pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on  Indian lands in  the
State of Utah is administered by EPA.
The program for wells on the lands of
the Navajo and Ute Mountain Ute con-
sists of the requirements set forth at
subpart HHH of this part. The program
for all other wells on Indian lands con-
sists of the UIC program requirements
of 40  CFR  parts 124, 144, 146, 148, and
any additional requirements set forth
in the  remainder of this subpart. Injec-
tion well  owners  and  operators, and
EPA shall  comply  with these require-
ments.
  (b) Effective date. The  effective date
for  this program for all  other Indian
lands in Utah (as well as for the pro-
gram of the Navajo and Ute Mountain
Ute) is November 25, 1988.
[53 FR  40391, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9420, Mar. 6, 1991] h

       Subpart UU—Vermont

§ 147.2300  State-administered     pro-
   gram.
  The  UIC program for  all classes of
wells  in the State  of Vermont, except
those  wells  on  Indian  lands,  is  the
program administered by the Vermont
Department  of  Environmental Con-
servation,  approved by EPA pursuant
to section 1422 of the SDWA. Notice of
this approval was published in the  FR
on June 22, 1984;  the effective date of
this program is July 6, 1984. This pro-
gram  consists of  the following  ele-
ments:
  (a) Incorporation by reference.  The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph  are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Vermont. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved  by the
Director of the Federal Register  July 6,
1984.
  (1) Vt.  Stat.  Ann. tit.  10, sections
1251, 1259,  1263 (1973 and Supp. 1981), Ef-
fective date: July 1, 1982.
  (2) Vermont Department of Water Re-
sources and Environmental  Engineer-
ing, Chapter 13 Water  Pollution  Con-
trol Regulations,  Subchapter 13.UIC—
Underground  Injection  Control,  Dis-
charges to  Injection Wells, Effective
Date: June 21, 1984.
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations  although not  incor-
porated by reference, also are part of
the approved  State-administered  pro-
gram:
  (1) Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, sections 1251
through 1283 (1973 and Supp. 1981).
  (2) Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, sections 901
through 911 (1973 and Supp. 1981).
  (3) Vt. Stat. Ann.  tit. 3,  sections 801
through 847 (1973 and Supp. 1981)
  (c)(l)  The  Memorandum of  Agree-
ment between EPA  Region I and the
Vermont  Agency  of  Environmental
Conservation  signed by the EPA  Re-
gional  Administrator  on  January  16,
1984.
  (d) Statement  of legal authority.  (1)
"Vermont   Attorney General's  State-
ment for Classes I, II, III, IV and V In-
jection Wells," signed by Attorney  Gen-
eral John J. Easton, Jr., as submitted
with Vermont Application  for Primary
Enforcement Responsibility to Admin-
ister the  Underground Water  Source
Protection Program Pursuant  to  the
Safe Drinking Water Act  and 40  CFR
145.21  through  145.24  (December  20,
1983).
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the original application or as supple-
ments thereto.

(42 U.S.C. 300)
[49 FR 25634, June 22, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43091, Oct. 25, 1988; 56 FR 9420,  Mar. 6,
1991]
                                    794

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2400
§§ 147.2301-147.2302  [Reserved]

§ 147.2303  EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State  of Vermont is  administered by
EPA. This program consists of the UIC
program requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and any additional re-
quirements set forth in the remainder
of this subpart. Injection well owners
and  operators, and EPA shall comply
with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands in
Vermont is November 25, 1988.
[53 FB  43091, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9420, Mar. 6, 1991]

§§ 147.2304-147.2349  [Reserved]

       Subpart W—Virginia

§ 147.2350  State-administered     pro-
    gram. [Reserved]

§ 147.2351  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
State  of Virginia, including all Indian
lands,  is administered by EPA.  This
program consists of the UIC program
requirements of 40  CFR parts 124, 144,
146,  148,  and any additional  require-
ments set forth in  the remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators,  and  EPA  shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates.  The effective date
for the UIC program on Indian lands is
November  25, 1988.  The effective date
for the UIC program for the remainder
of Virginia  is June 25,  1984. (53  FR
43091, October 25, 1988).
[56 FB 9420, Mar. 6, 1991]

§147.2352  Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
   served]

     Subpart WW—Washington

§ 147.2400  State-administered     pro-
   gram—Class I,  II,  III, IV, and V
   wells.
  The  UIC program for Class  I, II, III,
IV,  and V  wells in the State  of Wash-
ington other  than  those  on Indian
lands,  is the program  administered by
the Washington Department  of  Ecol-
ogy, approved by EPA pursuant to sec-
tion 1422 of the SDWA.  Notice of this
approval was published in the FEDERAL
REGISTER on August 9, 1984; the effec-
tive date of this program is September
24,  1984. This program consists of the
following  elements,  as  submitted  to
EPA   in    the   State's   program
application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Washington. This incorpo-
ration by reference  was approved by
the Director of the Federal Register ef-
fective September 24, 1984.
  (1) Revised Code of Washington sec-
tion 90.48.020,  90.48.080,  90.48.160, and
90.48.162 (Bureau  of  National Affairs,
1983 Laws);
  (2) Washington Administrative Code
sections 173-218-010  to 173-218-110 (Bu-
reau of National Affairs, 2/29/84);
  (3) Washington Administrative Code
sections  344-12-001 to 344-12-262 (1983
Ed.)
  (4) Washington Administrative Code
Chapter 173-160 (reprinted May 1988).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations  although  not incor-
porated by reference, also are part of
the approved State-administered pro-
gram:
  (1) Revised Code of Washington, chap-
ter 34.04 (Bureau of National Affairs,
1981 Laws),  entitled "Administrative
Procedure act";
  (2) Revised Code of Washington, chap-
ter 43.21 A (Bureau of National Affairs,
1980 Laws),  entitled  "Department  of
Ecology,"  as amended by 1983 Wash-
ington Laws, Chapter 270;
  (3) Revised Code of Washington, chap-
ter 70.105  (Bureau of National Affairs,
1983 Laws), entitled "Hazardous Waste
Disposal";
  (4) Revised Code of Washington, chap-
ter 78.52 (Bureau of National Affairs,
1983 Laws), entitled  "Oil and  Gas Con-
servation";
  (5) Revised Code of Washington, chap-
ter 90.48 (Bureau of National Affairs,
1986 Laws),  entitled  "Water Pollution
Control."
  (c)(l)  The  Memorandum of Agree-
ment between EPA  Region X and the
                                     795

-------
§147.2403
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
Washington Department  of Kcology,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator on May 14, 1984;
  (2) Memorandum of Agreement be-
tween  the  Washington Department of
Ecology and Oil and Gas Conservation
Committee, Belated  to  the  Under-
ground Injection Control  Program for
the State of Washington, signed March
23, 1984;
  (3) Memorandum of Agreement be-
tween  the  Washington Department of
Ecology and Washington Department
of Natural Resources, Related to the
Underground  Injection Control  Pro-
gram for  the  State of  Washington,
signed March 23,1984;
  (4) Memorandum of Agreement be-
tween  the  Washington Department of
Ecology and Department of Social and
Health Services, Related to  the Under-
ground Injection Control  Program for
the State of Washington, signed March
23, 1984;
  (d) Statement of legal authority. Letter
from Attorney General of the State of
Washington, by Senior Assistant At-
torney  General,  to  Director, Wash-
ington State Department of Ecology,
"Re: Underground  Injection  Control
Regulatory  Program—Attorney  Gen-
eral's Statement," February 28,1984.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted  as  part of
the original application  or as supple-
ments thereto.
[49 FR 31876, Aug. 9, 1984, as  amended at 56
FR 9420, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.2403  EPA-administered     pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State of Washington is administered by
EPA. This program, for all Indian lands
except those of the Colville Tribe, con-
sists of the UIC program requirements
of 40 CPR  parts 124, 144,  146,  148, and
any additional requirements set forth
in the remainder of this subpart. Injec-
tion well  owners  and operators,  and
EPA shall  comply with these require-
ments.
  (b) Effective  date. The effective date
for  the UIC program for Indian lands in
Washington is November 25,1988.
[53 FR 43091, Oct. 25, 1988, as  amended at 56
FR 9420, Mar. 6, 1991]
§ 147.2404  EPA-administered      pro-
   gram—Colville Reservation.
  (a) The UIC program for the Colville
Indian Reservation consists  of a prohi-
bition of all Class I, II, III and IV injec-
tion  wells and  of a  program adminis-
tered by EPA for Class  V wells. This
program consists of the UIC program
requirements of 40  CPR  part 124,  144
and  146  and any additional  require-
ments set  forth  in  the  remainder  of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
EPA shall comply with these require-
ments. The prohibition on  Class I-IV
wells is effective November 25, 1988. No
owner or operator shall construct,  op-
erate,  maintain,  convert, or conduct
any other injection activity thereafter
using Class I-IV wells.
  (b) Owners and operators  of Class I,
II, III or IV wells in existence on the ef-
fective date of the program shall cease
injection immediately. Within 60 days
of the effective date of the program,
the owner  or operator shall submit a
plan  and schedule   for  plugging  and
abandoning  the well for the Director's
approval. The owner or operator shall
plug and abandon the well according to
the approved plan and schedule.
[53 FR 43091, Oct. 25, 1988]

    Subpart XX—West Virginia

§§ 147.2450-147.2452   [Reserved]

§ 147.2453  EPA-administered      pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
State of West Virginia is administered
by EPA. This program consists of the
UIC  program requirements  of 40 CPR
parts 124, 144, 146, 148,  and any addi-
tional requirements set forth in the re-
mainder of this subpart.  Injection well
owners  and operators, and  EPA shall
comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date.  The  effective date
for the UIC program on Indian lands in
West Virginia is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43092, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9420, Mar. 6, 1991]
                                    796

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

§§ 147.2454-147.2499  [Reserved]

       Subpart YY—Wisconsin

§ 147.2500  State-administered     pro-
    gram.
  The  UIC program for Class I, II, III,
IV, and  V wells  in  the State of Wis-
consin,  other  than  those on  Indian
lands  as described in §147.2510, is the
program  administered  by  the  Wis-
consin  Department  of  Natural  Re-
sources,  approved by EPA pursuant to
SDWA section 1422.  Notice of this ap-
proval was published  in  the FEDERAL
REGISTER on September 30, 1983 (48 FR
44783); the effective date  of  this pro-
gram  is  November 30, 1983. This pro-
gram consists of a prohibition of all in-
jection wells except heat pump return
flow injection wells and may be found
in the  following elements, as submitted
to EPA in the State's program applica-
tion.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set forth in the State stat-
utes  and  regulations cited in  this
paragraph  are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Wisconsin. This incorpora-
tion by reference  was approved by the
Director of the OFR in accordance with
5 U.S.C.  552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Cop-
ies may  be obtained at the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources, Box
7921, Madison, Wisconsin, 53707. Copies
may be inspected at the Environmental
Protection Agency, Region V, 77  West
Jackson  Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois,
60604, or at the National  Archives and
Records  Administration  (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or
go     to:     http://www.archives.gov/
federal	register/
code	of	federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1)  Wisconsin   Statutes  Annotated
§§147.015,  147.02  and  147.04 (West 1974
and Supp. 1983);
  (2) Chapter NR 112, Well Construction
and Pump Installation, Wisconsin Ad-
ministrative  Code  §§NR  112.03 and
112.20  (October 1981),  as  amended by
Natural  Resources  Board  Order  No.
WQ-25-82, approved by the Natural Re-
sources Board on August 25, 1982;
                           §147.2500

  (3) Chapter NR 113, Servicing Septic
Tanks,  Seepage Pits, Grease Traps or
Privies,   Wisconsin    Administrative
Code   §§NR  113.07-113.08  (1979),   as
amended by Natural  Resources Board
Order No.  WQ-25-82,  approved by  the
Wisconsin Natural Resources Board on
August 25, 1982;
  (4) Chapter NR 181,  Hazardous Waste
Management,  Wisconsin  Administra-
tive Code §§NR 181.04-181.415 (1981), as
amended June 1985;
  (5) Chapter  NR 210,  Sewage Treat-
ment Works, Wisconsin Administrative
Code §210.05 Natural  Resources Board
Order No.  WQ-25-82,  approved by  the
Wisconsin Natural Resources Board on
August 25, 1982;
  (6) Chapter NR 214,  Land Application
and Disposal   of  Liquid  Industrial
Wastes and By-Products, Wisconsin Ad-
ministrative Code  §§214.03 and  214.06
(1983).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and regulations, although  not incor-
porated by  reference  except for select
sections identified in paragraph  (a) of
this section, are also part of  the  ap-
proved State-administered program:
  (1)  Chapter   144,   Water,   Sewage,
Refuse,  Mining and Air Pollution, Wis-
consin Statutes Annotated (West 1974
and Supp. 1983);
  (2) Chapter 147, Pollution Discharge
Elimination, Wisconsin Statutes Anno-
tated (West 1974 and Supp. 1983);
  (3) Chapter 162, Pure Drinking Water,
Wisconsin  Statutes  Annotated  (West
1974 and Supp. 1983);
  (4) Laws of 1981, Chapter 20, §2038 (Re:
heat pump injection);
  (5) Wisconsin Statutes 803.09(1)  (West
1977) (intervention as of right  in civil
actions).
  (c) Memorandum  of Agreement.  The
Memorandum  of Agreement  between
EPA Region V and the Wisconsin  De-
partment of Natural Resources, signed
by  the Regional Administrator on  De-
cember 6, 1983.
  (d) Statement  of  legal authority.  (1)
"Attorney General's Statement," signed
by  Attorney  General,  State  of Wis-
consin;
  (2) Letter from Assistant Attorney
General, State  of Wisconsin,  to EPA
Region, "Re: Amendments to Attorney
General's  Statement-UIC,"  June   30,
1983.
                                    797

-------
§147.2510
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (e) Program Description. The Program
Description and  other  materials  sub-
mitted as part of the application or as
supplements thereto.

[49 FR 45309, Nov. 15, 1984,  as amended at 56
PR 9420, Mar. 6, 1991; 56 FR 14150, Apr. 5, 1991;
62 FR 1834, Jan. 14, 1997]

§ 147.2510 EPA-administered      pro-
   gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for In-
dian lands in the State  of Wisconsin is
administered  by  EPA.  This program
consists of 40 CFR parts 144 and 146 and
additional requirements set forth  in
this section. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA, shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b)  Requirements.   Notwithstanding
the requirements  of  paragraph (a)  of
this  section for Indian lands in Wis-
consin no owner or operator shall  con-
struct, operate,  maintain,  or convert
any Class I, II, III, IV  or V injection
well.
  (c) Effective date. The effective date of
the UIC  program requirements for In-
dian lands in Wisconsin  is December 30,
1984.

[49 FR 45309, Nov. 15, 1984]

      Subpart ZZ—Wyoming

§ 147.2550 State-administered     pro-
   gram—Class I, III, IV and V wells.
  The UIC program for  Class I, III, IV
and V wells in the  State of Wyoming,
except those on Indian lands is the pro-
gram  administered by the  Wyoming
Department of Environmental Quality
approved by EPA pursuant to  section
1422 of the SDWA.  Notice of this ap-
proval  was published in the FEDERAL
REGISTER on July 15, 1983 (48 FR 32344);
the effective date of this program  is
August 17, 1983. The program consists
of the following elements as submitted
to EPA in the State's program applica-
tion:
  (a) Incorporation by  reference. The re-
quirements set forth in  the  State stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited  in  this
paragraph are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a  part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Wyoming. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the  Federal Register on
June 25, 1984.
  (1) Wyoming Environmental  Quality
Act, Wyoming Statutes sections 35-11-
101 through  35-11-115,  and 35-11-301
through  35-11-305  (1977  Republished
Edition and 1989 Cumm. Supp.);
  (2) Water Quality Rules and  Regula-
tions,  Wyoming  Department of Envi-
ronmental  Quality, Chapter III: Regu-
lations for  Permit to Construct, Install
or Modify Public  Facilities Capable or,
(sic) Causing or Contributing to Pollu-
tion (certified copy, signed December
21, 1983);
  (3) Water Quality Rules and  Regula-
tions,  Wyoming  Department of Envi-
ronmental  Quality, Chapter VIII: Qual-
ity Standards  for Groundwaters of Wy-
oming (certified  copy, signed April 9,
1980);
  (4) Water Quality Rules and  Regula-
tions,  Wyoming  Department of Envi-
ronmental  Quality, Chapter  IX; Wyo-
ming  Groundwater Pollution  Control
Permit (certified copy, signed April 9,
1980);
  (5) Water Quality Rules and Regula-
tions,  Wyoming  Department of Envi-
ronmental  Quality, Chapter XIII: Pro-
hibitions of Permits for New Hazardous
Waste  Injection Wells (certified copy,
signed August 25,  1989);
  (6) Land  Quality Rules and Regula-
tions,  Wyoming  Department of Envi-
ronmental  Quality,  Chapter XXI: In
Situ Mining (effective March 26, 1981).
  (b) Other  laws. The following statutes
and regulations,  although not incor-
porated by reference except for select
sections identified in paragraph (a) of
this section, are  also  part of  the  ap-
proved State-administered program:
  (1) Article 9, Underground Water, Wy-
oming  Statutes  sections    41-3-901
through 41-3-938 (September 1982);
  (2) Wyoming Administrative Proce-
dure Act, Wyoming  Statutes sections
9-4-101 through 9-^115 (1988);
  (3)  Department of   Environmental
Quality Rules of Practice and Proce-
dure (1982).
  (c)(l)  The Memorandum  of Agree-
ment  between EPA, Region  VIII  and
the Wyoming  Department  of Environ-
mental Quality, signed by the EPA Re-
gional Administrator on April 26, 1983.
  (2) Letter from Regional  Adminis-
trator, EPA Region VIII, to  Governor
                                    798

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2551
of Wyoming, May 21, 1982, with Attach-
ment (regarding aquifer exemptions);
  (3) Letter from Governor of Wyoming
to  Regional Administrator, EPA Re-
gion VIII,  "Re: Underground Injection
Control  (UIC) Program—Aquifer Ex-
emption Issues," June 7, 1982;
  (4)  Letter from  Regional Adminis-
trator, EPA Region VIII to Governor of
Wyoming,  "Re: Underground Injection
Control  (UIC) Program—Aquifer Ex-
emption Issues," June 25, 1982;
  (5)  Letter from Director, Wyoming
Department of Environmental Quality,
to Acting Director, Water Management
Division, EPA Region VIII, December
1, 1982.
  (d)  Statement  of legal authority. (1)
"Attorney  General's  Statement—Wyo-
ming Statutory  and  Regulatory Au-
thority for Assumption of  the Under-
ground Injection Control Program Pur-
suant  to  the Federal  Safe Drinking
Water Act," signed by Attorney Gen-
eral and Assistant  Attorney  General
for the State  of Wyoming, September
22, 1982;
  (2) Letter from Attorney General for
the State  of Wyoming to Acting Re-
gional Counsel, EPA  Region VIII, "Re:
Wyoming Assumption of the UIC Pro-
gram—$36,  Chapter IX, Wyoming Water
Quality Rules and  Regulations," No-
vember 24,  1982.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted  as  part  of
the application or amendment thereto.
[49 PR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43092, Oct. 25,  1988;  56 FR 9421, Mar. 6,
1991]

§ 147.2551   State-administered      pro-
    gram—Class II wells.
  The UIC program for Class II wells in
the State of Wyoming, except those on
Indian lands, is  the program adminis-
tered by the Wyoming Oil and Gas Con-
servation   Commission  approved  by
EPA pursuant to section  1425 of the
SDWA.  Notice of  this  approval was
published in the  FR  on November 23,
1982 (47  FR 52434);  the effective date of
this program is December 23, 1982. This
program consists of the following ele-
ments as  submitted to EPA  in the
State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by  reference.  The re-
quirements set forth in the  State stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited  in  this
paragraph are hereby  incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the State of Wyoming. This incorpora-
tion by reference was approved by the
Director of the OFR in accordance  with
5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51.  Cop-
ies may be obtained at the Wyoming
Oil and Gas Conservation Commission,
Office of the State Oil and Gas Super-
visor,  P.O.  Box 2640,  77  West  First
Street, Casper, Wyoming, 82602. Copies
may be inspected at the Environmental
Protection  Agency, Region  VIII, 999
18th Street, Suite 500,  Denver,  Colo-
rado, 80202-2405,  or at the National Ar-
chives  and  Records  Administration
(NARA). For information on  the avail-
ability of this material at NARA, call
202-741-6030,   or    go   to:   http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of_federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1) Rules and Regulations of the Wyo-
ming Oil and Gas  Conservation Com-
mission, including Rules of Practice
and Procedure, as published by the Wy-
oming Oil and Gas Conservation Com-
mission, August 7, 1990;
  (2) Title 30, Chapter 5, Wyoming Stat-
utes, sections 30-5-101 through 30-5-126
(June 1983 and Wyoming Statutes An-
notated, July 1990 Supp.).
  (b) Memorandum of Agreement. (1) The
initial Memorandum of Agreement be-
tween EPA, Region VIII and Wyoming
Oil and  Gas Conservation Commission,
signed by the EPA Regional Adminis-
trator and  the Oil Field Supervisor  of
the Commission  on June 2, 1982;
  (2) Amendment No. 1 to the Memo-
randum of Agreement,  dated  December
22, 1982;
  (3) Amendment No. 2 to the Memo-
randum of Agreement,  dated January
25, 1990;
  (4) Letter from State Oil and Gas Su-
pervisor, Wyoming Oil and  Gas  Con-
servation Commission,  to  the Acting
Director, Water  Management Division,
EPA Region VIII, "Re: Application for
Primacy in  the  Regulation of  Class  II
Injection Wells," March 8, 1982;
  (5) Letter from State Oil and Gas Su-
pervisor, Wyoming Oil and  Gas  Con-
servation Commission, to EPA Region
VIII, "Re: Regulation of Liquid Hydro-
carbon Storage  Wells  Under the  UIC
Program," July 1, 1982;
                                    799

-------
§147.2553
                                                  40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (6) Memorandum  of Agreement  Be-
tween  the  Wyoming State  Board of
Control, State Engineer,  Oil  and  Gas
Conservation Commission, and the  De-
partment of Environmental  Quality,
dated October 14, 1981.
  (c) Statement  of legal  authority.  (1)
"Statement  of Legal Authority"  and
"State Review of Regulations and Stat-
utes Relevant to  the UIC  Program-
Class II Wells," signed by Special  As-
sistant Attorney General for the State
of Wyoming, as submitted with "Wyo-
ming Oil and Gas Conservation Com-
mission, Application for Primacy in
the  Regulation  of  Class II Injection
Wells  under Section 1425 of the Safe
Drinking Water Act," November 1981;
  (2) Letter from special Assistant  At-
torney General for  the  State of Wyo-
ming  to Assistant  Regional  Counsel,
EPA Region VIII, May 13,1982:
  (3) Letter from special Assistant  At-
torney General for  the  State of Wyo-
ming  to Assistant  Regional  Counsel,
EPA Region VIII, July 1, 1982.
  (d) Program Description. The Program
Description  and other  material  sub-
mitted as  part  of the  application or
amendments  thereto,  including  the
memorandum  to  the  National   UIC
Branch reporting on Improvement to
the Wyoming Oil and Gas 1425 program,
dated April 28, 1989.
[56 FR 9421, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.2553  EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in  the
                                        State  of Wyoming is administered by
                                        EPA. This program consists of the UIC
                                        program requirements of 40 CFR parts
                                        124, 144,  146, 148, and  any additional re-
                                        quirements set forth in the remainder
                                        of this subpart. Injection well owners
                                        and operators,  and EPA shall comply
                                        with these requirements.
                                          (b) Effective  date. The  effective date
                                        for the UIC program  on Indian lands in
                                        Wyoming is November 25, 1988.
                                        [53 FR  43092, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
                                        FR 9422, Mar. 6, 1991]

                                        § 147.2554  Aquifer exemptions.
                                          In  accordance with  §§144.7(lb)  and
                                        146.4 of this chapter, those portions of
                                        aquifers currently being used for injec-
                                        tion in  connection  with Class II (oil
                                        and gas) injection operations on the
                                        Wind River Reservation, which are de-
                                        scribed below, are hereby exempted for
                                        the purpose of Class  II injection  activ-
                                        ity. This exemption applies only to the
                                        aquifers tabulated below, and  includes
                                        those  portions of the aquifers defined
                                        on  the surface by an outer boundary of
                                        those   quarter-quarter   sections   dis-
                                        sected by a line drawn parallel bo, but
                                        one-quarter mile  outside,  the  field
                                        boundary, and is restricted to extend
                                        no  further  than one-quarter mile  out-
                                        side the Reservation boundary.  Maps
                                        showing the  exact  boundaries of the
                                        field  may be  consulted  at the EPA's
                                        Region 8 Office, and at the EPA Head-
                                        quarters in Washington, DC.
     AREAS To BE EXEMPTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CLASS II INJECTION ON THE WIND RIVER
                                  RESERVATION
              Formation
                                    Approximate
                                      depth
                                                           Location
Steamboat Butte Field
      Phosphona ...
Wmkleman Dome Field
      Tensleep  	


      Phosphoria	
                                     6,500-7,100



                                     6,900-7,500




                                     2,800-3,300


                                     2,800-3,600
T3N, R1W—W/2 Sec  4, Sec. 5. E/2 Sec. 6, NE/4
 Sec. 8, W/2 Sec 9.
T4N, R1W—W/2 Sec. 29, E/2 Sec. 30, E/2 Sec 31,
 Sec 32
T3N, R1W—W/2 Sec  4, Sec. 5, E/2 Sec 6, NE/4
 Sec 8, W/2 Sec. 9
T4N, R1W—W/2 Sec. 29, E/2 Sec 30, E/2 Sec. 31,
 Sec. 32.

T2N, R1W—SW/4 Sec 17, Sections 18, 19, 20, 29,
 NE/4 Sec 30.
T2N, R2W—E/2 Sec 13, NE/4 Sec. 24
T2N, R1W—SW/4 Sec 17, Sections 18, 19, 20, 29,
 NE/4 Sec. 30
T2N, R2W—E/2 Sec 13, NE/4 Sec 24
                                      800

-------
Environmental Protection Agency

      AREAS To BE EXEMPTED
                                                 §147.2555
FOR THE PURPOSE OF CLASS II INJECTION ON THE WIND RIVER
     RESERVATION—Continued
                Formation
            Approximate
               depth
                                                                    Location
      Nugget
Lander Field
      Phosphona
NW Sheldon Field
      Crow Mountain and Cleverly

Circle Ridge Field
      Tensleep	
      Phosphona .

      Amsden
RoW Lake Field
      Crow Mountain .
             1,100-1,500



             1,100-3,800




             3,400-3,600


             1,500-1,800



              800-1,800

               700-1,200

             3,500-3,700
T2N, R1W—SW/4 Sec. 17, Sections 18, 19, 20, 29,
  NE/4 Sec 30
T2N, R2W—E/2 Sec 13, NE/4 Sec 24

T2S, R1E—Sections 12 and 13,  E/2 Sec 24, NE/4
  Sec 25
T2S, R2E—W/2 Sec 18, W/2 Sec. 19, Sec. 30
T33N, R99W—Sec 4

T6N, R3W—SE/4 Sec  35, SW/4 Sec 36
T5N, R3W—N/2 Sec 1

T6N, R2W—Sec 6, N/2 Sec 7
T7N, R3W—SE/4 Sec  36
T7N, R2W—SW/4 Sec 31
T6N, R3W—E/2 Sec 1
T7N, R3W—S/2 Sec 36
T6N, R3W—NE/4 Sec  1
T6N, R3W—Sec 6

T6N, H3W—SW/4 Sec 26, NW/4 Sec 27
[53 FR 43092, Oct. 25, 1988]
§ 147.2555  Aquifer   exemptions   since
    January 1, 1999.
  In   accordance  with  §144.7(b)  and
§ 146.4 of this chapter,  the aquifers de-
                        AQUIFER EXEMPTIONS SINCE JANUARY 1,1999
                  scribed in the following table are here-
                  by exempted  from the  definition of an
                  underground  source of  drinking water,
                  as defined in 40 CFR 144.3:
Formation
Powder River Basin, only approximately 04
square miles of the Lance Formation which is
less than 0005% of the Basin at indicated
depths and location








Lance Formation at indicated depths and locations












Approximate depth (feet
below
ground surface)
3,800—6,800











3,800—6,500












Location
Two cylindrical volumes with centers in the wells
COGEMA DW No. 1 and 18-3 Chnstensen re-
spectively, and radius of 1 ,320 feet Both wells
are located in the Chnstensen Ranch, in John-
son County, WY The COGEMA DW No 1
well is located at approximately 450 feet West
of N/S line and 100 feet North of E/W line of
SE/4, NW/4, Section 7, T44N, R76W The 18-
3 Chnstensen well is located approximately
600 feet West of N/S line and 550 South of E/
W line of NE/4, NW/4, Section 18, T44N,
R76W
Two cylindrical volumes with centers in the wells
COGEMA DW No 2 and COGEMA DW No. 3
respectively, and radius of 1320 feet Both
wells are located in the Christensen Ranch, in
Johnson County WY The COGEMA DW No
2 is located at approximately 2,290 feet from
the North line and 1130 feet from the East line
SW1/4 SE1/4 NE1/4 of Section 7, Township
44 North, Range 76 West The COGEMA DW
No 3 is located approximately 3300 feet from
the North line and 1340 feet from the West
line center of SW1/4 of Section 5, Township
44 North, Range 76 West
[64 FR 14803, Mar. 26, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 47726, July 22, 2002]
                                           801

-------
§147.2600
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
       Subpart AAA—Guam

§ 147.2600 State-administered     pro-
   gram.
  The XJIC program for all classes of
wells in the territory of Guam, except
those on Indian lands, is  the program
administered by the Guam Environ-
mental  Protection Agency,  approved
by EPA pursuant to SDWA section
1422. Notice of  this approval was pub-
lished  in the  FEDERAL  REGISTER  on
May 2, 1983 (47  PR 19717);  the effective
date of this  program is June 1, 1983.
This program consists of the following
elements, as  submitted to EPA in the
State's program application:
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set  forth in the State stat-
utes  and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby  incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program under the SDWA for
the territory of Guam. This incorpora-
tion  by reference was approved by the
Director of the  Federal  Register  on
June 25, 1984.
  (1)   Water  Resources  Conservation
Act,  Government  Code  of Guam sec-
tions  57021-57025,  Public  Law 9-31
(March 9, 1967), as amended by Public
Law  9-76 (July  29,  1967), as amended by
Public Law 12-191 (December 30,1974);
  (2) Water Pollution Control Act, Gov-
ernment Code  of Guam sections 57042
and  57045, Public Law  9-76  (July  29,
1967), as  amended  by Public Law 9-212
(August 5, 1968), as amended by Public
Law  10-31 (March 10, 1969), as amended
by Public  Law 12-191  (December  30,
1974);
  (3) Guam Environmental Protection
Agency, Underground Injection Control
Regulations,  Chapters 1-9, as revised
by amendments adopted September  24,
1982;
  (4) Guam Environmental Protection
Agency, Water  Quality Standards, Sec-
tion  I-IV (approved September 25, 1981,
effective November 16,1981).
  (b) Other laws. The following statutes
and  regulations, although not  incor-
porated by reference except for specific
sections  identified in paragraph (a) of
this  section,  are also part of the ap-
proved State-administered program:
  (1) Government Code of Guam, Title
XXV, Chapters I-III (sections  24000-
24207);
  (2) Government Code of Guam, Title
LXI,  Chapters I-III  (sections  57000-
57051);
  (3) Government Code of Guam, Title
LXI, Chapters VI (sections 57120-57142);
  (4) Government Code of Guam, Title
LXI,  Chapters VIII  (sections  57170-
57188);
  (5) Government Code of Guam, Title
LXI,  Chapters  XII  (sections  57285-
57299);
  (c) The  Memorandum of Agreement
between EPA, Region IX and the Guam
Environmental   Protection   Agency
signed by the Regional Administrator
on January 14,1983.
  (d) Statement of legal  authority.  (1)
Letter from Attorney General of Guam
to Regional Administrator, Region IX,
"Re: Attorney General's Statement for
Underground   Injection Control  Pro-
gram (UIC),  Ground  Water  Program
Guidance #16" May 12, 1982;
  (2) Letter from Attorney General of
Guam to Regional Administrator,  Re-
gion IX, "Re: Additional comments to
be incorporated into the May 12, 1982,
Attorney General's  Statement for  Un-
derground Injection Control Program,"
September 2,1982.
  (e) The Program Description and any
other materials  submitted as part of
the application or amendments  there-
to.

[49 PR 20197, May 11, 1984, as amended at 53
FR 43092, Oct. 25, 1988]

§ 147.2601  EPA-administered      pro-
    gram—Indian lands.

  (a) Contents. The UIC program for In-
dian lands in the territory of Guam is
administered  by  EPA. This  program
consists of the UIC program  require-
ments of 40 CFR parts  124, 144, 146, 148,
and any additional  requirements set
forth in the remainder of  this  subpart.
Injection  well owners and operators,
and EPA  shall comply with these re-
quirements.
  (b) Effective date.  The effective date
for the UIC program on Indian lands in
the territory  of Guam  is November 25,
1988.

[53 FR 43093, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9422, Mar. 6, 1991]
                                    802

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2701
     Subpart BBB—Puerto Rico

§ 147.2650 State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class I,  II, III, IV,  and V
    wells.
  The  Underground Injection  Control
Program for all classes of wells in the
Commonwealth  of  Puerto Rico, other
than those on Indian lands, is the pro-
gram administered by Puerto Rico's
Environmental  Quality  Board  (BQB),
approved by the EPA pursuant to the
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) sec-
tion 1422. This program consists of the
following elements,  as  submitted  to
EPA in the Commonwealth's program
application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements  set forth in the State stat-
utes  and  regulations  cited  in  this
paragraph are hereby incorporated by
reference and made a part of the appli-
cable UIC program under the SDWA for
the  Commonwealth  of  Puerto  Rico.
This incorporation by reference was ap-
proved by the Director of the  Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1  CFR part 51. Copies may be
obtained or inspected at the following
locations: EPA, Region II,  26  Federal
Plaza,  room 845, New York,  NY 10278;
EPA, Headquarters,  401  M  St.,  SW.,
room E1101A, Washington, DC 20460; or
the National Archives and Records Ad-
ministration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at
NARA, call  202-741-6030, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal	register/
code	of	federal	regulations/
ibr	locations.html.
  (1)  Underground   Injection  Control
Regulations of  the  Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, Parts I through V and ap-
pendices A  and  B,  adopted  September
14, 1983 (Amended July 20,  1988).
  (2) Puerto Rico Public  Policy Envi-
ronmental Act (PRPPE), Title 12 Laws
of  Puerto  Rico  Annotated  (LPRA)
Chapters 121 and 131, 1977 edition, as
amended 1988 edition, and Chapter 122,
1988 edition.
  (b) Memorandum  of Agreement. The
Memorandum of Agreement between
EPA Region II and  the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico's EQB signed by the Re-
gional  Administrator on August 23,
1991.
  (c) Statement of  legal authority. (1)
Attorney General's  statement on the
Commonwealth  of  Puerto Rico's Au-
thority to apply for, assume  and carry
out the UIC Program,  dated June 26,
1987. (2) Letter  from the Governor  of
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico re-
questing the program,  dated July 16,
1987.
  (d) Program description. The Descrip-
tion of the Commonwealth  of Puerto
Rico's  Underground Injection  Control
Program, dated with the effective date
October 30, 1986.

[57 PE 33446, July 29, 1992]

§ 147.2651  EPA-administered      pro-
    gram— Indian lands.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for all
classes of wells on Indian lands in the
Commonwealth  of Puerto  Rico is ad-
ministered by EPA. This program con-
sists of the UIC  program requirements
of 40 CFR parts 124, 144,  146, 148 and any
additional  requirements set forth  in
the remainder of this  subpart. Injec-
tion well owners  and  operators and
EPA shall comply with  the require-
ments.
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
for the UIC program on Indian Lands in
the Commonwealth of  Puerto  Rico  is
November 25, 1988.

[57 FR 33446, July 29, 1992]
   Subpart CCC—Virgin Islands
§ 147.2700 State-administered
    gram. [Reserved]
pro-
§ 147.2701  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
Virgin  Islands,  including  all Indian
lands,  is  administered by  EPA. This
program consists of the UIC  program
requirements of 40 CFR parts 124, 144,
146,  148, and  any  additional  require-
ments  set forth  in the remainder  of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall  comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
of the  UIC  program for  non-Indian
lands in the Virgin Islands is December
30, 1984. The effective date for Indian
lands in the Virgin Islands is November
25, 1988.

[53 FR 43093, Oct. 25, 1988, as  amended at 56
FR 9422, Mar. 6, 1991]
                                    803

-------
§147.2750
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
 Subpart ODD—American Samoa

§ 147.2750 State-administered     pro-
    gram. [Reserved]

§ 147.2751 EPA-administered program.
  (a)  Contents.  The  UIC program for
American Samoa, including all Indian
lands,  is administered  by EPA.  This
program consists of the UIC program
requirements of 40 CFR parts 124, 144,
146, 148, and any additional  require-
ments set  forth  in  the remainder of
this subpart. Injection well owners and
operators, and EPA shall comply with
these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
for the  UIC program  on  non-Indian
lands  is June  25, 1984. The effective
date of  the UIC program  on Indian
lands is November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43093, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
PR 9422, Mar. 6, 1991]

§147.2752 Aquifer  exemptions.  [Re-
    served]

 Subpart EEE—Commonwealth of
   the Northern Mariana Islands

§ 147.2800 State-administered     pro-
    gram—Class I,  II, III,  IV,  and  V
    wells.
  The UIC program for Class I, II, III,
IV, and V wells in the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands, other
than those on Indian lands, is the pro-
gram  administered by  the Common-
wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
Division of Environmental Quality ap-
proved  by  EPA  pursuant  to  Section
1422 of  the  SDWA.  Notice  of  this ap-
proval was  published in the FEDERAL
REGISTER on January 18, 1985; the effec-
tive date of this program is  August 30,
1985. This program consists  of the fol-
lowing elements,  as submitted to EPA
in the State's program application.
  (a) Incorporation by reference. The re-
quirements set  forth in the State stat-
utes and regulations cited in this para-
graph are hereby incorporated by ref-
erence and made a part of the applica-
ble UIC program  under the  SDWA for
the Commonwealth of the  Northern
Mariana Islands. This incorporation by
reference was approved by the Director
of the Federal  Register effective July
31, 1985.
  (1) CNMI Environmental Protection
Act, 2 CMC sections 3101, et seq. (1984);
  (2) CNMI Coastal  Resources Manage-
ment Act, 2 CMC sections  1501,  et seq.
(1984);
  (3)  CNMI Drinking  Water  Regula-
tions,  Commonwealth Register, Vol-
ume 4, Number 4 (August 15, 1982);
  (4) CNMI Underground Injection Con-
trol Regulations, Commonwealth Reg-
ister, Volume  6, Number  5  (May  15,
1984, amended November 15, 1984, Janu-
ary 15, 1985);
  (5) CNMI Coastal  Resources Manage-
ment   Regulations,   Commonwealth
Register, Volume 6,  Number 12, Decem-
ber 17, 1984.
  (b)(l)  The  Memorandum  of  Agree-
ment between EPA  Region IX and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mar-
iana Islands Division of Environmental
Quality,  signed by  the EPA Regional
Administrator on May 3,1985;
  (c) Statement of legal authority.  State-
ment from Attorney General Common-
wealth  of  the  Northern Mariana  Is-
lands, "Underground Injection Control
Program—Attorney   General's   State-
ment," signed on October 10, 1984.
  (d) The Program Description and any
other materials submitted as part of
the original application or as supple-
ments thereto.
[50 FR 28943, July 17, 1985]

§ 147.2801  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for In-
dian lands in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands  is adminis-
tered by EPA. This program consists of
the UIC program requirements of 40
CFR parts 124, 144, 146,  148, and any ad-
ditional requirements set forth  in the
remainder  of this  subpart. Injection
well owners and operators, and EPA
shall comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date.  The effective date
of the UIC program for Indian lands is
November 25, 1988.

[53 FR 43093, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9422, Mar. 6, 1991]
                                    804

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2902
1147.2802 Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
    served]

 Subpart FFF—Trust Territory of the
           Pacific Islands

1147.2850 State-administered     pro-
    gram. [Reserved]

§ 147.2851 EPA-administered program.
  (a)  Contents. The UIC  program for
Trust Territory of  the Pacific Islands,
including all Indian lands, is adminis-
tered by EPA. This program consists of
the UIC program  requirements  of 40
CPR parts 124, 144, 146, 148, and any ad-
ditional requirements set forth in the
remainder  of this subpart. Injection
well owners  and operators, and  EPA
shall comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective dates. The effective date
of  the  UIC  program for  non-Indian
lands of the Trust Territory of the Pa-
cific Islands is June 25, 1984. The effec-
tive date for the Indian  lands is  No-
vember 25, 1988.
[53 FR 43093, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
PR 9422, Mar. 6, 1991]

§147.2852 Aquifer   exemptions.   [Re-
    served]

  Subpart GGG—Osage Mineral
      Reserve—Class H Wetis

  AUTHORITY:  Safe  Drinking  Water Act, 42
U.S.C. 300h.
  SOURCE: 49 PR 45309, Nov. 15, 1984,  unless
otherwise noted.

§ 147.2901 Applicability and scope.
  This subpart sets forth the rules and
permitting- requirements for the Osage
Mineral Reserve, Osage County,  Okla-
homa, Underground Injection  Control
Program. The  regulations  apply  to
owners  and operators of Class II  injec-
tion wells located on the Reserve,  and
to EPA.

§ 147.2902 Definitions.
  Most  of the following terms are de-
fined  in §144.3, and have simply been
reproduced here for the convenience of
the reader. This  section also includes
definitions of some  terms unique to the
Osage program. Terms used in this sub-
part are defined as follows:
  Administrator—the  Administrator  of
the United States Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, or an authorized rep-
resentative.
  Aquifer—a geologic formation,  group
of formations,  or  part of a formation
that is capable of yielding a significant
amount of water to a well or spring.
  BIA—The "Bureau  of Indian Affairs,"
United States Department of Interior.
  Casing—a pipe or  tubing  of varying
diameter  and weight, lowered into  a
borehole  during  or  after drilling  in
order to support the sides of the hole
and, thus, prevent the walls from cav-
ing, to prevent loss of drilling mud into
porous  ground,  or to prevent  water,
gas,  or other fluid from entering the
hole.
  Cementing—the operation  whereby  a
cement slurry is pumped into a drilled
hole and/or forced behind the casing.
  Class  II Wells—wells  which   inject
fluids:
  (a) Which are brought  to the surface
in connection with conventional  oil  or
natural gas  production and  may  be
commingled  with  waste  waters from
gas plants which are an integral part of
production operations, unless those wa-
ters would be classified as a hazardous
waste at the time of injection;
  (b) For  enhanced recovery of  oil  or
natural gas; and
  (c)  For storage   of  hydrocarbons
which are liquid at  standard tempera-
ture and pressure.
  Existing Class II  Wells—wells  that
were  authorized  by  BIA  and  con-
structed and completed  before the ef-
fective date of this program.
  New Class II Wells—wells constructed
or converted  after the effective date of
this program, or which are  under con-
struction  on  the effective date of this
program.
  Confining bed—a body of impermeable
or distinctly less  permeable material
stratigraphically  adjacent  to  one  or
more aquifers.
  Confining zone—a geologic formation,
group of formations,  or part  of a forma-
tion that is  capable of  limiting fluid
movement above an injection zone.
  Contaminant—any physical, chemical,
biological, or radiological substance  or
matter in water.
                                    805

-------
§147.2903
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  Disposal well—a well used for the dis-
posal of waste into  a subsurface stra-
tum.
  EPA—The  United  States  Environ-
mental Protection Agency.
  Fault—a surface or zone of rock frac-
ture along which there has been dis-
placement.
  Fluid—material  or substance which
moves or flows whether in a semisolid,
liquid, sludge, gas or any other form or
state.
  Formation—a body  of rock character-
ized by a  degree of lithologic homo-
geneity which is prevailingly, but not
necessarily, tabular and is mappable  on
the earth's surface or traceable in the
subsurface.
  Freshwater—"Underground source  of
drinking water."
  Ground water—water below  the land
surface in a zone of saturation.
  Injection  well—a  well  into  which
fluids are being injected.
  Injection  zone—a  geological  forma-
tion, group of formations, or  part of a
formation  receiving  fluids  through  a
well.
  Lithology—the description  of rocks  on
the basis  of  their physical  and chem-
ical characteristics.
  Owner/operator—the owner  or oper-
ator of any facility or activity subject
to  regulation  under the  Osage  UIC
program.
  Packer—a device lowered into a well
to produce a  fluid-tight  seal within the
casing.
  Permit—an  authorization  issued   by
EPA  to  implement  UIC  program  re-
quirements.  Permit  does not include
the UIC  authorization by rule  or any
permit which has not yet been the sub-
ject of final Agency action.
  Plugging—the act or process of stop-
ping the flow of water,  oil or gas into
or  out  of   a  formation   through   a
borehole or well  penetrating  that for-
mation.
  Pressure—the total  load or force per
unit area acting on a surface.
  Regional Administrator—the  Regional
Administrator  of Region  6  of the
United States  Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, or  an authorized  rep-
resentative.
  Subsidence— the lowering  of the nat-
ural land surface in  response to: Earth
movements; lowering of fluid  pressure;
removal  of underlying supporting ma-
terial by mining or solution solids, ei-
ther  artificially   or  from   natural
causes;  compaction  due  to  wetting
(hydrocompaction);  oxidation of  or-
ganic matter in soils; or added load on
the land surface.
  Underground   source    of  drinking
water— an aquifer or its portion:
  (a)(l)  Which  supplies  any  public
water system; or
  (2) Which contains a sufficient quan-
tity of ground water to  supply a public
water system; and
  (i) Currently  supplies  drinking water
for human consumption; or
  (ii)  Contains  fewer than  10,000 mg/1
total dissolved solids; and
  (b) Which is not an exempted aquifer.
  USDW— underground source  of drink-
ing water.
  Well—A bored, drilled, or driven shaft,
or a dug hole  whose depth is greater
than the largest surface dimension.
  Well injection—the subsurfac emplace-
ment of fluids through a bored, drilled,
or driven well;  or  through a dug well,
where the  depth  of  the dug well  is
greater than the largest surface dimen-
sion.
  Well workover—any  reentry  of an in-
jection well; including, but not limited
to, the  pulling of tubular goods,  ce-
menting  or casing repairs; and exclud-
ing any routine maintenance (e g.  re-
seating the packer at the same depth,
or repairs to surface equipment).

§ 147.2903  Prohibition of unauthorized
    injection.
  (a) Any underground  injection,  ex-
cept as  authorized by permit or rule
issued under the UIC program, is pro-
hibited.  The construction or operation
of any well required to have a permit is
prohibited until the  permit has been
issued.
  (b) No  owner or operator shall con-
struct,  operate,  maintain,  convert,
plug, or abandon any injection well, or
conduct any other injection  activity,
in a manner that allows the movement
of fluid  containing any  contaminant
into underground  sources  of  drinking
water, if the presence of that  contami-
nant may cause the  violation of any
primary  drinking  water  regulation
under 40 CFR part 142 or may otherwise
adversely affect the health of persons.
                                    806

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2905
The applicant for a permit shall have
the burden of showing1 that the require-
ments of this paragraph are met.
  (c) Injection  between the outermost
casing1 protecting1 underground sources
of drinking1 water and the well bore is
prohibited.

§ 147.2904  Area of review.
  (a) The area of review for an  injec-
tion well  or project will be a fixed ra-
dius of one-forth of a mile from  the
well, field or project.
  (b) The zone of endangering1 influence
is the lateral area around the injection
well or project in which  the injection
zone pressures may cause movement of
fluid  into an  underground source  of
drinking water (USDW) if there are im-
properly  sealed,   completed  or  aban-
doned  wells present. A zone of endan-
gering influence may be determined by
EPA through the use of an appropriate
formula  that addresses  the  relevant
geologic,  hydrologic, engineering and
operational features of the well, field,
or project.

§ 147.2905   Plugging and abandonment.
  The  owner/operator shall notify the
Osage  UIC office  within 30 days of the
date injection has terminated. The well
must be plugged within  1 year after
termination of injection. The Regional
Administrator may extend the time to
plug,  but only if no fluid movement
into a  USDW will occur, and the oper-
ator has presented a viable plan for uti-
lizing  the well  within  a  reasonable
time,
  (a) Until an injection well has been
properly plugged and abandoned, an-
nual reports to the Regional Adminis-
trator  on well  status, and mechanical
integrity tests as outlined in §§147.2912
and 147.2920 will  be required, whether
or not injection has ceased.
  (b) All wells shall be plugged to pre-
vent movement of fluid into an USDW.
 (c) The  owner/operator shall notify
the Osage UIC  office by certified mail
at least 5  days prior to the commence-
ment of plugging  operations. The Osage
UIC office may waive or reduce the 5-
day notice requirement when a quali-
fied EPA representative is available to
witness the  plugging operation. The
following  information  must  be sub-
mitted as part of the notification:
  (1) Type and number of plugs to be
used;
  (2) Elevation  of top  and bottom of
each plug;
  (3) Method of plug placement; and
  (4) Type,  grade and quantity of ce-
ment to be used.
  (d) The  well shall be kept full of mud
as casing  is removed. No surface casing
shall be removed without written ap-
proval from  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator.
  (e)(l) If surface casing is adequately
set and cemented  through  all fresh-
water  zones (set to at least 50 feet
below the base  of freshwater),  a plug
shall be set at least 50 feet  below the
shoe of the casing  and extending at
least 50  feet  above  the shoe  of  the
casing, or
  (2) If the surface casing and cement-
ing is inadequate, the well bore shall be
filled with cement from a point 50 feet
below the  base of fresh water to a point
50 feet above  the  shoe of the surface
casing, and any  additional plugs as re-
quired by the Osage  UIC office and/or
the Osage  Agency.
  (3) In all cases, the top 20 feet of the
well bore below 3 feet of ground surface
shall  be   filled  with cement.  Surface
casing  shall be cut  off 3 feet below
ground surface and covered with a se-
cure steel cap on top  of  the surface
pipe. The  remaining 3  feet  shall  be
filled with dirt.
  (f)(l) Except as provided in paragraph
(f)(2) of this section, each producing or
receiving  formation  shall be  sealed off
with a 50-foot cement plug  placed at
the base of the formation and a 50-foot
cement plug placed  at  the top of the
formation.
  (2) The  requirement  in paragraph
(f)(l) of this section does not apply if
the  producing/receiving formation  is
already sealed off from  the  well  bore
with adequate casing and cementing
behind casing, and casing is  not to be
removed, or the only openings from the
producing/receiving formation into the
well bore  are  perforations in the cas-
ing, and the annulus between the cas-
ing and the outer  walls  of the well is
filled with cement for a distance of 50
feet  below the base  of the formation
and 50 feet above the top of the forma-
tion. When such,  conditions exist, a
                                    807

-------
§147.2906
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
bridge plug capped with 10 feet of ce-
ment set  at the  top  of the producing
formation may be used.
  (g) When specified by the Osage UIC
office, any uncased, hole below the shoe
of any casing to be left in the well shall
be filled with  cement to a depth of at
least 50 feet below the casing shoe, or
the bottom of the hole, and the casing
above the shoe shall be filled with ce-
ment to at least 50 feet above the shoe
of the casing.  If the well has a screen
or liner which  is not to be removed, the
well bore shall be filled  with cement
from the base  of the screen or liner to
at least 50 feet above the  top  of  the
screen or liner.
  (h) All  intervals  between  cement
plugs in the well bore shall  be filled
with mud.
  (i) A report  containing  copies of the
cementing tickets shall be submitted
to BIA within  10 days of plugging com-
pletion.
  (j) A surety bond must be on file with
the Bureau of  Indian Affairs (BIA), and
shall not be released until the well has
been properly plugged and the  Regional
Administrator has agreed to the re-
lease of the bond.

§ 147.2906   Emergency permits.
  (a) An  emergency permit  may be
issued if:
  (1) There will be an imminent health
hazard unless  an emergency permit is
issued; or
  (2) There will be a substantial and ir-
retrievable  loss  of oil  and  gas  re-
sources, timely application for a per-
mit  could not practicably have been
made, and injection will  not  result in
movement of fluid into an USDW; or
  (3) There will be a substantial delay
in oil or gas production, and  injection
will not result in movement of fluid
into an USDW.
  (b) Requirements—(1) Permit  duration.
(i) Emergency permits issued to avoid
an imminent health threat may last no
longer than the time necessary to pre-
vent the hazard.
  (ii) Emergency permits issued to pre-
vent a substantial  and  irretrievable
loss of oil or gas  resources shall be for
no longer than 90 days, unless a com-
plete permit application has been sub-
mitted during that time; in which case
the emergency permit may be extended
until a final decision on the permit ap-
plication has been made.
  (iii) Emergency permits to avoid a
substantial delay in oil or gas produc-
tion shall be issued only  after a com-
plete permit application has been sub-
mitted and  shall be  effective until a
final decision on the permit applica-
tion is made.
  (2) Notice of the emergency permit
will be given by the Regional Adminis-
trator  according  to the notice  proce-
dure for a draft permit within 10 days
after issuance.
  (3) An emergency permit may be oral
or written. If oral, a written emergency
permit must be issued within five cal-
endar days.

§147.2907  Confidentiality  of  informa-
    tion.
  (a) The following  information cannot
be  claimed  confidential  by the  sub-
mitter:
  (1) Name and address of permit appli-
cant or permittee.
  (2) Information  concerning the exist-
ence, absence or level of contaminants
in drinking water.
  (b) Other information claimed as con-
fidential will  be  processed in accord-
ance with 40 CFR  part 2.

§ 147.2908  Aquifer exemptions.
  (a) After notice and opportunity for a
public hearing, the  Administrator may
designate any aquifer or part of an aq-
uifer as an exempted aquifer.
  (b) An aquifer or  its portion  that
meets the definition of a USDW may be
exempted by EPA from USDW status if
the following conditions are met:
  (1) It  does not  currently serve  as a
source of drinking water, and
  (2) It cannot now and will not in the
future  serve as a  source  of  drinking
water because:
  (i) It  is  hydrocarbon producing,  or
can be demonstrated by a permit appli-
cant as a part of a permit application
lor a Class II operation to contain hy-
drocarbons  that  are  expected  to be
commercially producible (based on his-
torical production or geologic informa-
tion); or
  (ii) It is situated at a depth or loca-
tion which makes recovery of water for
drinking water purposes economically
or technologically impractical; or
                                    808

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2912
  (iii) It is  so contaminated that it
would  be  economically  or  techno-
logically impractical to  render that
water fit for human consumption; or
  (3)  The Total Dissolved Solids con-
tent  of the groundwater is more than
3,000  and less than 10,000 mg/1 and it is
not reasonably expected  to  supply a
public water system.

§147.2909  Authorization  of  existing
    wells by rule.
  All existing  Class II injection wells
(wells authorized  by  BIA  and  con-
structed or completed on or  before the
effective date  of  the Osage  UIC pro-
gram) are hereby authorized. Owners or
operators of wells authorized by rule
must comply  with  the provisions of
§§147.2903, 147.2905, 147.2907, and 147.2910
through 147.2915.

§147.2910  Duration  of authorization
    by rule.
  Existing Class II injuction wells are
authorized for the life of the well, sub-
ject to the obligation to obtain a per-
mit if specifically required by the Re-
gional   Administrator  pursuant   to
§ 147.2915.

§ 147.2911  Construction requirements
    for wells authorized by rue.
  All Class II wells shall be  cased and
cemented  to  prevent  movement  of
fluids into USDWs.  The Regional  Ad-
ministrator shall review inventory in-
formation, data submitted in permit
applications, and other records, to de-
termine  the  adequacy of construction
(completion)   or  existing   injection
wells. At the Regional Administrator's
discretion, well casing and cementing
may be considered adequate if it meets
the BIA requirements that were  in ef-
fect at the time of construction  (com-
pletion)  and  will not result in move-
ment of fluid into  an USDW.  If the Re-
gional Administrator determines that
the construction of a well authorized
by rule is inadequate, he shall require
a permit, or he shall notify the owner/
operator and the owner/operator shall
correct the problem according to in-
structions from the Regional Adminis-
trator. All corrections must be  com-
pleted within one year  of owner/oper-
ator notification of inadequacies.
§147.2912  Operating requirements for
    wells authorized by rule.
  (a) Each well authorized by rule must
have mechanical integrity. Mechanical
integrity  must be demonstrated within
five years of  program  adoption. The
Regional  Administrator  will notify the
well owner/operator three months be-
fore  proof  of mechanical   integrity
must be submitted to EPA. The owner/
operator  must contact the Osage UIC
office at  least five days prior to test-
ing. The  owner/operator may perform
the mechanical integrity test prior to
receiving  notice from the Regional Ad-
ministrator, provided the Osage UIC of-
fice is notified at least five days in ad-
vance. Conditions  of both paragraphs
(a)(l) and (a)(2) of this section must be
met.
  (1) There is no significant leak in the
casing,  tubing or packer. This may be
shown by  the following:
  (i) Performance of a pressure test of
the casing/tubing annulus to  at least
200 psi,  or the pressure specified by the
Regional Administrator,  to be repeated
thereafter, at  five year intervals,  for
the life of the well (pressure tests con-
ducted  during  well  operation  shall
maintain  an injection/annulus pressure
differential of at least 100 psi through
the tubing length); or
  (ii)  Maintaining  a  positive  gauge
pressure on the casing/tubing annulus
(filled with liquid) and monitoring the
pressure monthly and reporting of the
pressure information annually; or
  (iii) Radioactive tracer survey; or
  (iv) For enhanced  recovery  wells,
records  of monitoring showing the  ab-
sence of significant changes in the re-
lationship between  injection  pressure
and  injection  flow rate at  the well
head, following an initial pressure test
as described  by  paragraph  (a)(l)(i)  or
(v) of this section; or
  (v) Testing  or  monitoring programs
approved  by  the  Regional   Adminis-
trator on a case-by-case basis,  and
  (2) There is no significant fluid move-
ment  into a  USDW through  vertical
channels  adjacent to the  well  bore.
This may be  shown by any of the fol-
lowing:
  (i) Cementing records (need not be re-
viewed every  five years);
  (ii)  Tracer  survey  (in  appropriate
hydrogeologic settings; must be used in
                                    809

-------
§147.2913
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
conjunction with at least one of the
other alternatives);
  (iii) Temperature log;
  (iv) Noise log; or
  (v) Other tests  deemed acceptable by
the Regional Administrator.
  (b) Injection pressure at  the wellhead
shall be limited so that it  does not ini-
tiate new fractures or propagate exist-
ing fractures in the confining zone ad-
jacent to any UDSW.
  (1) For  existing Class II salt water
disposal   wells,  The  owner/operator
shall,  except during  well  stimulation,
use an injection  pressure  at the  well-
head no greater than the pressure cal-
culated by using the following formula:
Pm=(0.75-0.433Sg)d
where:
Pm=injection pressure at the wellhead  in
  pounds per square inch
Sg=specific   gravity  of  injected  fluid
  (unitless)
d=injection depth in feet.

Owner/operator of  well* shall comply
with the above injection pressure lim-
its no  later than one year after the ef-
fective date of this regulation.
  (2) For existing Class II  enhanced re-
covery wells, the  owner or  operator:
  (i) Shall  use an injection pressure no
greater than the pressure established
by the Regional Administrator for the
field or formation in which the well is
located.  The  Regional  Administrator
shall  establish such a maximum  pres-
sure after notice, opportunity for com-
ment,  and opportunity for  a public
hearing according to the provisions  of
part 124, subpart  A of this  chapter, and
will  inform owners and operators  in
writing of the  applicable maximum
pressure.
  (ii)  Prior to such  time  as  the Re-
gional Administrator establishes  rules
for maximum injection pressures based
on  data  provided  pursuant  to para-
graph  (b)(2)(ii)(B) of this section the
owner/operator shall:
  (A)  Limit injection pressure at the
wellhead to a value which will not ini-
tiate new fractures or propagate exist-
ing fractures in the confining zone ad-
jacent to any USDW; and
  (B)  Submit  data acceptable  to the
Regional Administrator which  defines
the fracture pressure of the formation
in which injection is taking place.  A
single test may be submitted on behalf
of two  or more operators conducting
operations in the same  formation,  if
the Regional Administrator approves
such submission. The data shall be sub-
mitted  to the Regional Administrator
within one year of the effective date  of
this program.
  (c) Injection  wells or projects which
have  exhibited  failure to  confine in-
jected fluids to  the  authorized injec-
tion zone or zones may be subject to re-
striction of injection volume and pres-
sure,  or shut-down,  until  the failure
has been identified and corrected.

(The information  collection requirements
contained in paragraphs (a)(l) (ii) through
(v) and (a)(2) (i) through (v) were approved by
the Office of Management and Budget under
control number 2040-0042)

§ 147.2913 Monitoring  and   reporting
    requirements  for wells authorized
    by rule.
  (a) The owner/operator has the duty
to submit inventory information to the
Regional Administrator upon request.
Such request may be a  general request
to all operators in the  County (e.g.,
public notice,  or mailout requesting
verification of information).
  (b) The operator shall monitor the in-
jection pressure (psi) and rate (bbl/day)
at least monthly, with the results re-
ported  annually. The  annual  report
shall specify the types of methods used
to generate the monitoring data.
  (c) The owner/operator  shall  notify
the Osage UIC  office  within 30 days  of
any mechanical failure or  down-hole
problems involving well integrity, well
workovers, or any noncompliance. As
required, operators must apply for and
obtain a workover permit from the Bu-
reau of Indian Affairs Osage Agency be-
fore reentering an injection well. If the
condition may endanger an USDW, the
owner/operator shall  notify the Osage
UIC office orally within 24 hours, with
written notice including plans for test-
ing and/or repair to be submitted with-
in five  days. If all the information  is
not available within five days, a fol-
lowup report must be submitted within
30 days.
  (d)  The owner/operator shall  deter-
mine  the nature of injected fluids ini-
tially,  when  the nature of  injected
                                     810

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2918
fluids is changed or when new constitu-
ents are added. The records should re-
flect the source of character of the new
fluid  and the date changes were made.
  (e)  The owner/operator  shall retain
all monitoring records for three years,
unless an enforcement action is pend-
ing, and then  until three  years  after
the enforcement action has been re-
solved.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 2040-0042)

§ 147.2914 Corrective  action  for wells
    authorized by rule.
  Based  on  the Regional  Administra-
tor's  discretion, corrective action to
prevent  movement  of fluid into an
USDW may be  required for improperly
sealed,  completed or  abandoned wells
(i.e., wells or well bores which may pro-
vide  and avenue for  fluid  migration
into a USDW) within the zone of endan-
gering   influence   (as   defined   in
§147.2904,  Area  of Review)  of an injec-
tion well authorized by rule.
  (a)  EPA  will notify the  operator
when corrective action is required. Cor-
rective action may include:
  (1) Well modifications:
  (i) Recementing;
  (ii) Workover;
  (iii) Reconditioning;
  (iv) Plugging  or replugging;
  (2) Limitations on injection pressure
to prevent movement of fluid into an
USDW;
  (3) A more stringent monitoring pro-
gram; and/or
  (4) Periodic testing of other wells to
determine if significant movement of
fluid has occurred.
  (b)  If  the monitoring  discussed in
paragraph (a) (3) or (4) of  this section
indicate the potential endangerment of
an  USDW, then action as  described in
paragraph (a) (1) or (2) of  this section
must be taken.

§ 147.2915 Requiring a permit for wells
    authorized by rule.
  (a) The Regional Administrator  may
require  the  owner or  operator  of  any
well authorized by rule to apply for an
individual  or  area  permit.  The   Re-
gional Administrator  shall notify the
owner/operator  in writing  that a  per-
mit application is required. The notice
shall contain:
  (1) Explanation of need for applica-
tion;
  (2) Application  form and, if appro-
priate, a list of additional information
to be submitted; and
  (3) Deadline  for application  submis-
sion.
  (b) Cases in which the  Regional Ad-
ministrator may require  a permit in-
clude:
  (1) The owner or  operator is not in
compliance with provisions of the rule;
  (2) Injection well is no longer within
the category of wells authorized by
rule;
  (3)  Protection of USDWs  requires
that the injection operation  be regu-
lated  by requirements which are not
contained in the rule; or
  (4) Discretion of Regional Adminis-
trator.
  (c) Injection  is no longer authorized
by rule upon the effective  date of a per-
mit or permit denial, or upon failure of
the owner/operator to submit an appli-
cation in a timely manner as  specified
in the notice described in paragraph (a)
of this section.
  (d) Any owner/operator authorized by
rule may request to be excluded from
the coverage of the rules by  applying
for an individual or area UIC permit.

§147.2916 Coverage of permitting re-
   quirements.
  The owner or operator of a new Class
II injection well or  any other Class II
well required to have a permit in the
Osage Mineral Reserve shall  comply
with  the requirements of §§147.2903,
147.2907, 147.2918, through 147.2928.

§ 147.2917 Duration of permits.
  Unless otherwise specified in the per-
mit, the permits will be in effect until
the well is plugged and abandoned or
the permit terminated. The Regional
Administrator will review each issued
permit at least once every five years to
determine whether it should be  modi-
fied or terminated.

§147.2918 Permit application  informa-
   tion.
  (a) The owner/operator  must submit
the original and three copies of the per-
mit application, with two  complete
sets of attachments, to the Osage UIC
office. The application should be signed
                                    811

-------
§147.2919
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
by  the  owner/operator or a  duly au-
thorized representative.  The  applica-
tion should  also  Include appropriate
forms (i.e., BIA's Application for Oper-
ation or Report on Wells  and EPA's
permit application). The applicant has
the burden of proof to show that the
proposed injection activities will not
endanger USDWs.
  (b) The application shall include the
information listed below. Information
required by paragraphs (b) (5), (7), or (9)
of this  section that  is  contained in
EPA or BIA files may be included in
the application by reference.
  (1) Map  using  township-range  sec-
tions showing the area  of review and
identifying all wells of public record
penetrating the injection interval.
  (2) Tabulation of data  on the wells
identified in paragraph (b)(l) of  this
section, including  location, depth, date
drilled,  and record of plugging and/or
completion.
  (3) Operating data:
  (i) Maximum  and average  injection
rate;
  (ii) Maximum and average  injection
pressure;
  (iii) Whether operation is on cyclic or
continuous operation basis; and
  (iv) Source and  appropriate  analysis
of injected fluids, including total dis-
solved solids, chlorides, and additives.
  (4) Geologic data on the injection and
confining zones, including faults, geo-
logical  name, thickness permeability,
depth and lithologic description.
  (5) Depth to base of fresh water.
  (6) Schematic drawings of the surface
and  subsurface details   of  the  well,
showing:
  (i) Total depth or plug-back depth;
  (ii) Depth to top and bottom of injec-
tion interval;
  (iii) Depths to tops and bottoms of
casing  and  cemented intervals,  and
amount of cement to be used;
  (iv) Size  of casing and tubing,  and
depth of packer; and
  (v) Hole diameter.
  (7) Proof that surety bond  has been
filed with the  BIA Superintendent in
accordance with 25 CFR 226.6. A surety
bond must be maintained until the well
has been properly plugged.
  (8) Verification of public notice, con-
sisting of a list showing the names, ad-
dresses, and date that notice of permit
application was given or sent to:
  (i) The surface land owner;
  (ii) Tenants on land where injection
well is  located  or  proposed to be lo-
cated; and
  (iii) Each  operator of a  producing
lease within one-half mile of the well
location.
  (9) All available logging and testing
data on the well (for existing wells, i.e.,
wells  to be converted  or  wells pre-
viously  authorized by rule).
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 2040-0012)

§ 147.2919 Construction requirements
    for wells authorized by permit.
  (a) All Class n wells shall be sited so
that they inject into a formation that
is separated from any USDW by a con-
fining- zone free of known open faults or
fractures within the area of review.
  (b) All Class II wells shall  be cased
and cemented to prevent movement of
fluids into or between USDWs. Require-
ments shall be based on the  depth to
base of fresh water,  and the  depth to
the injection zone.  Newly drilled Class
II wells must have  surface casing set
and cemented to at  least 50 feet below
the base of  fresh water, or the equiva-
lent (e.g., long string cemented to sur-
face). At the Regional Administrator's
discretion, the casing and cementing of
wells to be converted may be consid-
ered adequate if they meet the BIA re-
quirements  that were in effect at the
time of construction (completion), and
will not result  in  movement  of fluid
into a USDW.
  (c) Owner/operators shall provide  a
standard female fitting  with  cut-off
valves, connected to the tubing and the
tubing/casing annulus so that the in-
jection  pressure and annulus pressure
may be  measured by an EPA represent-
ative by attaching  a gauge having  a
standard male fitting.
  (d) No owner or operator may begin
construction of a new well until a per-
mit authorizing such construction has
been issued, unless such construction is
otherwise authorized by an area per-
mit.
                                     812

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2921
§147.2920  Operating requirements for
    •wells authorized ay permit.
  (a) For new Class II wells,  injection
shall  be through adequate  tubing  and
packer. Packer shall be run on the tub-
ing and set inside the casing  within 75
feet of the top of the injection interval.
For existing Class II, wells,  injection
shall  be through adequate  tubing  and
packer, or according to alternative op-
erating requirements  approved  by  the
Regional  Administrator,  as necessary
to prevent the movement of fluid into
a USDW.
  (b) Bach well  must have  mechanical
integrity. Mechanical integrity of  the
injection  well must be shown prior to
operation.  The owner/operator must
notify the Osage UIC office at  least  five
days  prior to  mechanical  integrity
testing. Conditions of both paragraphs
(b) (1) and (2) of this section must be
met.
  (1) There is no significant leak in the
casing,  tubing or packer. This may be
shown by the following:
  (i) Performance  of a pressure  test of
the casing/tubing  annulus  to at least
200 psi,  or the pressure specified by the
Regional Administrator, to  be repeated
thereafter,  at five year intervals,  for
the life of the well (Pressure tests con-
ducted  during  well  operation shall
maintain an injection/annulus pressure
differential of at least 100 psi through-
out the tubing length); or
  (ii)  Maintaining  a positive  gauge
pressure on the casing/tubing annulus
(filled with liquid) and monitoring  the
pressure monthly  and reporting of  the
pressure information annually; or
  (iii) Radioactive tracer survey; or
  (iv)  For  enhanced  recovery  wells,
record of monitoring  showing the  ab-
sence of significant  changes in the re-
lationship between  Injection pressure
and injection flow rate at the wellhead,
following an initial pressure test as de-
scribed  by paragraph (b)(l)  (i) or (v) of
this section; or
  (v) Testing or monitoring programs
approved  by the  Administrator on  a
case-by-case basis, and
  (2) There is no significant fluid move-
ment into  a USDW through vertical
channels  adjacent to the  well bore.
This may be shown  by any of the  fol-
lowing:
  (i) Cementing records (need not be re-
viewed every five years);
  (ii) Tracer survey  (in  appropriate
hydrogelogic settings; must be used in
conjunction  with at least one  of the
other alternatives);
  (iii) Temperature log;
  (iv) Noise log; or
  (v) Other tests  deemed acceptable by
the Administrator.
  (c) Injection pressure at the wellhead
shall be limited so that it does not ini-
tiate new fractures or propagate exist-
ing fractures in the  confining zone ad-
jacent to any UDSW.
  (d) Injection wells or projects which
have  exhibited failure to confine in-
jected fluids to  the  authorized  injec-
tion zone or zones may be subject to re-
striction of injected volume and pres-
sure or shut-in,  until the failure has
been identified and corrected.
  (e)  Operation  shall not  commence
until proof has been submitted  to the
Regional  Administrator, or  an  EPA
representative has witnessed that any
corrective action  specified in the per-
mit has been completed.

§ 147.2921  Schedule of compliance.
  The permit may,  when appropriate,
specify  a schedule of compliance lead-
ing to compliance with the Safe  Drink-
ing Water Act and the Osage UIC regu-
lations.
  (a) Any schedule of compliance shall
require  compliance as soon as possible,
and in no case later than three years
after the effective date of the permit.
  (b) If a permit establishes a schedule
of compliance which exceeds one year
from the date of permit issuance, the
schedule shall  set  forth interim re-
quirements  and  the  dates  for their
achievement.
  (1) The  time  between  interim dates
shall not exceed one year.
  (2) If the time necessary for comple-
tion of  any interim requirement  is
more than 1 year and is not readily di-
visible into  stages for completion, the
permit shall specify interim dates for
the submission of reports of progress
toward  completion of the interim re-
quirements  and  indicate a  projected
completion date.
  (c) The permit shall be written to re-
quire that if a  schedule  of compliance
                                    813

-------
§147.2922
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
is applicable,  progress reports be sub-
mitted no later than 30 days following
each interim date and the final date of
compliance.

§147.2922 Monitoring  and  reporting
    requirements for wells  authorized
    by permit.
  (a)  The owner/operator shall notify
the Osage UIC office within 30 days of
the  date  on  which  injection  com-
menced.
  (b) The operator shall monitor the in-
jection pressure (psi) and rate (bbl/day)
at least monthly, with the results re-
ported annually.  The annual reports
shall specify the types or methods used
to generate the monitoring data.
  (c)  The owner/operator shall notify
the Osage UIC office within 30 days of
any mechanical  failure or down-hole
problems involving well integrity, well
workovers, or any noncompliance. (Op-
erators  should note the obligation to
apply for and obtain a workover permit
from  the  Bureau  of  Indian Affairs
Osage Agency before reentering an in-
jection well.) If the condition may en-
danger an USDW,  the  owner/operator
shall  notify  the  Osage  UIC  officer
orally within 24 hours, with written no-
tice including plans for testing and/or
repair to be submitted within five days.
If all the information is not available
within five days,  a followup  report
must be submitted within 30 days.
  (d)  The owner/operator shall retain
all monitoring records for three years,
unless an enforcement action is pend-
ing, and then  until three years after
the enforcement action has  been re-
solved.
  (e)  The owner/operator shall notify
the Osage UIC  office in writing  of  a
transfer of ownership at least 10  days
prior to such transfer.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 2040-0042)

§147.2923  Corrective action for wells
    authorized by permit.
  All  improperly sealed, completed or
abandoned wells  (i.e.,  wells or  well
bores which may provide an avenue for
movement of  fluid  into  an  UDSW)
within the zone  of endangering  influ-
ence  (as defined in §147.2904, Area of
Review)  that  penetrate the injection
zone of a Class II well, must have cor-
rective action taken  to prevent move-
ment of fluid into a USDW.
  (a) EPA will review completion  and
plugging records of  wells within  the
zone of endangering influence that pen-
etrate the injection zone and will no-
tify  the  operator when corrective ac-
tion is required. Corrective action may
include:
  (1) Well modifications, including:
  (i) Recementing;
  (ii) Workover;
  (iii) Reconditioning; and/or
  (iv) Plugging or replugging;
  (2) Permit  conditions to limit injec-
tion pressure so as to prevent move-
ment of fluid into a USDW;
  (3) A more  stringent monitoring pro-
gram; and/or
  (4) Periodic testing of  other  wells
within the area  of review to  determine
if significant movement of fluid has oc-
curred. If the monitoring discussed in
paragraph (a)(3)  or (a)(4) of this section
indicates the potential endangerment
of a USDW, then action as described in
paragraph (a)(l)  or (a)(2) of this section
must be taken.
  (b) If the Regional Administrator has
demonstrable knowledge  that  wells
within the zone of endangering influ-
ence will not serve as conduits for fluid
movement  into  a  USDW, the permit
may be  approved  without  requiring
corrective action.  However, additional
monitoring shall be  required  to  con-
firm that no  significant migration  will
occur.

§ 147.2924 Area permits.
  (a) Area permits may be  issued for
more than one injection well if the fol-
lowing conditions are met:
  (1) All existing  wells  are described
and located in the permit application;
  (2) All wells are within the same well
field, project, reservoir or similar unit;
  (3) All  wells are of  similar construc-
tion; and
  (4) All wells are operated by the same
owner/operator.
  (b) Area permits shall specify:
  (1) The area within which injection is
authorized; and
  (2) The requirements  for construc-
tion, monitoring, reporting, operation
and abandonment for all wells author-
ized by the permit.
                                     814

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2925
  (c)  Area permits  can authorize the
construction  and  operation  of  new
wells within the permit area, if:
  (1)  The  permittee notifies  the Re-
gional Administrator in the annual re-
port of when and where any new wells
have or will be drilled;
  (2) The new wells meet the criteria
outlined in paragraphs  (a) and (b) of
this section; and
  (3) The effects of the new wells were
addressed in the permit application and
approved by  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator.

§ 147.2925  Standard permit conditions.
  (a) The permittee must comply with
all permit conditions, except as author-
ized by an emergency permit (described
in §147.2906). Noncompliance is grounds
for permit modification, permit termi-
nation or enforcement action.
  (b) The permittee has  a duty to halt
or reduce activity in order to  maintain
compliance with permit conditions.
  (c) The permittee shall take all rea-
sonable steps  to mitigate  any adverse
environmental impact resulting  from
noncompliance.
  (d) The permittee shall properly op-
erate and  maintain  all facilities in-
stalled or used  to meet permit condi-
tions.  Proper operation and  mainte-
nance also includes adequate operator
staffing  and  training, adequate  fund-
ing,  and adequate  engineering capa-
bility available.
  (e) This permit may be modified or
terminated for cause (see §§147.2927 and
147.2928). The filing of a  request by the
permittee for a permit modification or
termination,   or  a   notification  of
planned  changes or  anticipated  non-
compliance, does not stay  any permit
condition.
  (f) This permit does not convey any
property  rights,   or   any   exclusive
privilege.
  (g) The permittee shall furnish, with-
in a reasonable time, information that
the Regional  Administrator  requests,
for determination  of permit compli-
ance,  or  if cause  exists,  for  permit
modification or termination.
  (h)  The permittee  shall  allow  EPA
representatives,  upon presentation of
appropriate credentials or other docu-
mentation, to:
  (1) Enter permittee's premises where
a regulated activity is conducted or lo-
cated, or  where  records  required  by
this permit are kept;
  (2) Have access to and copy  records
required by this permit;
  (3) Inspect  any facilities, equipment,
practices or operations regulated or re-
quired by this permit; and
  (4) Sample  or monitor any substances
or parameters at any location for pur-
pose of assuring compliance with this
permit or the SDWA.
  (i) Monitoring and records.
  (1)  Samples  and  monitoring  data
shall   be representative  of  injection
activity.
  (2) Permittee shall retain monitoring
records for three years.
  (3) Monitoring records shall include:
  (i) Date, exact place and time  of sam-
pling or measurement;
  (ii)  Individual(s) who preformed  the
measurements;
  (iii) Date(s) analyses were performed;
  (iv) Individual(s) who performed the
analyses;
  (v) Analytical techniques or methods
used,  including quality assurance tech-
niques employed to insure  the genera-
tion of reliable data; and
  (vi) Results of analyses.
  (j) Signatory requirements. All applica-
tions, reports or information submitted
to the Regional  Administrator or  the
Osage UIC  office must be signed by the
injection facility owner/operator or his
duly  authorized  representative. The
person signing these documents must
make the following certification:

 "I certify under penalty of law that I have
personally examined and am  familiar with
the information submitted in this document
and all attachments and that,  based on my
inquiry of those individuals immediately re-
sponsible for obtaining the information, I be-
lieve that the information is true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are sig-
nificant penalties for submitting false infor-
mation, including-  the possibility of  fine and
imprisonment."

  (k)  Reporting  requirements. (1) The
permittee shall notify the Regional Ad-
ministrator as soon as possible of any
planned changes to the facility.
  (2) The permittee  shall give advance
notice to the Regional Administrator
of any planned changes which may re-
sult in noncompliance.
                                     815

-------
§147.2926
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (3) This permit is not transferable to
any  person  except after notice to the
Regional Administrator in accordance
with §147.2926.
  (1) A new injection  well shall not
commence injection until construction
is complete  and the  Regional Adminis-
trator has been notified of completion
of construction and has given his ap-
proval to commence  injection.

(The  information  collection  requirements
contained in paragraphs (g) and (i) were ap-
proved  by the  Office  of Management and
Budget under control number 2040-0042)

§ 147.2926 Permit transfers.
  (a) Permits may be transferred to an-
other permittee:
  (1) If the  current  permittee notifies
the Regional Administrator at least 10
days before  the proposed transfer  date;
and
  (2) If the  notice includes a written
agreement  between  the  existing  and
new permittees containing:
  (i) A specific date  for transfer of per-
mit responsibility, coverage and liabil-
ity; and
  (ii) Assurance that the new permittee
has a surety bond on file with BIA; and
  (3)  If  the  Regional Administrator
does not respond  with a notice to the
existing permittee that the permit will
be modified.
  (b) If the conditions in paragraph (a)
of this section are met, the transfer is
effective on the date specified in para-
graph (a)(2)(i) of this section.

§ 147.2927 Permit modification.
  (a) Permits may be modified for the
following causes  only  (with the excep-
tions listed in paragraph (b) of this sec-
tion regarding minor modifications):
  (1) There  are substantial changes to
the facility  or activity which occurred
after permit issuance that justify re-
vised or additional permit conditions.
  (2) The Regional  Administrator has
received information (e.g., from moni-
toring reports, inspections) which war-
rants a modified permit.
  (3) The regulations  or  standards on
which  the  permit  was  based  have
changed.
  (4) The Regional  Administrator has
received notice of a proposed permit
transfer.
  (5) An interested person requests in
writing that a permit be modified, and
the Regional Administrator determines
that cause for modification exists.
  (6)  Cause exists  for   termination
under §147.2928, but the Regional Ad-
ministrator  determines  that  permit
modification is appropriate.
  (b)  Minor modifications.  (1)  Minor
modifications  do not require that the
procedures  listed  in  paragraph  (c) of
this section be followed.
  (2) Minor modifications consist of:
  (i) Correcting typographical errors;
  (ii) Requiring more frequent  moni-
toring or reporting;
  (iii)  Changing  ownership   or  oper-
ational  control (see  §147.2926, Permit
Transfers); or
  (iv) Changing quantities or types of
injected fluids, provided:
  (A) The facility can  operate within
conditions of permit;
  (B) The facility classification would
not change.
  (c) Modification procedures. (1) A draft
permit shall be prepared with proposed
modifications.
  (2) The draft permit shall follow the
general  permitting  procedures  (i.e.,
public comment period, etc.) before a
final decision is made.
  (3) Only the changed conditions shall
be addressed in the draft permit or pub-
lic review.

§ 147.2928 Permit termination.
  (a)  Permits may be  terminated  for
the following causes only:
  (1) Noncompliance  with any permit
condition.
  (2)  Misrepresentation  or failure to
fully disclose any relevant facts.
  (3) Determination that the permitted
activity endangers human  health or
the environment.
  (4) Interested person requests In writ-
ing that a  permit be terminated and
the Regional Administrator determines
that request is valid.
  (b) Termination procedures. (1) The Re-
gional Administrator shall issue  notice
of intent to terminate (which is  a type
of draft permit).
  (2)  Notice of  intent  to  terminate
shall follow  the  general  permitting
procedures  (i.e., public comment  pe-
riod,  etc.)  before a  final decision is
made.
                                     816

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.2929
§147.2929  Administrative   permitting
    procedures.

  (a)  Completeness review.  (1) The Re-
gional Administrator shall review each
permit application  for  completeness
with  the application  requirements in
§147.2918. The review will be completed
in 10 days, and  the  Regional Adminis-
trator  shall  notify   the  applicant
whether or not the application is com-
plete.
  (2) If the application  is incomplete,
the Regional Administrator shall:
  (i) List the additional  information
needed;
  (ii) Specify a date by which the infor-
mation must be submitted; and
  (ill)  Notify the applicant when the
application is complete.
  (3) After an application is determined
complete, the Regional  Administrator
may request additional information to
clarify previously submitted informa-
tion. The application will still be con-
sidered complete.
  (4) If an applicant fails or refuses to
correct deficiencies in the application,
the permit may be  denied  and appro-
priate  enforcement actions taken.
  (b) Draft permits. (1) After an applica-
tion is deemed complete, the Regional
Administrator shall either  prepare  a
draft permit or notice of intent to deny
the permit  (which is  a type of draft
permit). If the Regional  Administrator
later decides the tentative  decision to
deny was wrong, he shall withdraw the
notice of intent to deny and prepare a
draft permit.
  (2) A draft  permit shall  contain at
least the following information:
  (i) The standard permit conditions in
§147.2925;
  (ii) Any monitoring- and reporting re-
quirements;
  (iii)  The construction  and operation
requirements; and
  (iv)  Plugging  and abandonment re-
quirements.
  (c) Statement of basis.  (1) The Regional
Administrator shall prepare a  state-
ment of basis for every draft permit.
  (2) The statement of  basis shall brief-
ly describe the draft permit conditions
and the reasons for them. In the case of
a notice of intent to deny or terminate,
the statement of basis shall give rea-
sons to support the tentative decision.
  (3) The statement  of basis shall be
sent to the applicant, and to any other
person who requests a copy.
  (d) Public notice. (l)(i) The Regional
Administrator shall give public notice
when:
  (A) A permit  application has  been
tentatively denied;
  (B) A draft permit has been prepared;
  (C) A hearing  has been scheduled; or
  (D) An appeal has been granted.
  (ii) The applicant shall give public
notice that he is submitting a  permit
application.
  (iii)  Public notice is not required
when a request for permit modification
or  termination  is  denied.  However,
written notice will be given to the per-
mittee and the requester.
  (iv) Public notices may include more
than one permit or action.
  (2)(i) Public notice of a draft  permit
(including  notice of intent to  deny)
shall allow at least 15  days  for public
comment.
  (ii) Public  notice of  a hearing shall
be given at  least 30 days before  the
hearing.
  (3)(i) Public notice  given by the  Re-
gional Administrator for  the reasons
listed in paragraph (d)(l)(i) of this sec-
tion shall be  mailed to the  applicant,
and  published in a  daily or weekly
paper of general circulation  in  the af-
fected area.
  (ii) Notice  of application submission
required by paragraph  (d)(l)(ii)  of this
section shall  be given  to  the surface
landowner, tenants on  the land where
an injection  well  is located  or  is pro-
posed to be  located, and to each oper-
ator of a producing lease  within one-
half mile of the well location prior to
submitting the application to the  Re-
gional Administrator.
  (4) The notice  of application submis-
sion  in  paragraphs   (d)(l)(ii)  and
(d)(3)(ii) of this section shall contain:
  (i) The applicant's name and address;
  (ii) The legal  location of  the injec-
tion well;
  (iii) Nature of activity;
  (iv) A statement that EPA will  be
preparing a draft permit and that there
will be an opportunity  for  public com-
ment; and
  (v) The name  and phone number of
EPA contact person.
  (5) All other notices shall contain:
                                    817

-------
§147.2929
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (i) The name,  address, and phone
number of the  Osage UIC office and
contact person for additional informa-
tion and copies of the draft permit;
  (ii) Name and address of permit ap-
plicant or permittee;
  (iii) Brief description of nature of ac-
tivity;
  (iv) Brief description of comment pe-
riod and comment procedures;
  (v) Location of the information avail-
able for public review; and
  (vi) In the case of a notice for a hear-
ing the notice shall also include:
  (A) Date, time, and location of hear-
ing-;
  (B) Reference to date of previous no-
tices of the same permit; and
  (C) Brief description of the purpose of
the hearing, including rules and proce-
dures.
  (e) Public comments. (1) During  the
public   comment  period,  any  person
may submit written comments on the
draft permit, and may request a public
hearing. A request for hearing shall be
in writing and state the issues  pro-
posed to be raised in the hearing.
  (2) The Regional Administrator shall
consider all  comments  when making
the final decision, and shall respond to
comments after the decision is made.
The response shall:
  (i) Specify if any changes were made
from the draft permit to the final per-
mit decision, and why;
  (ii)  Briefly describe and respond  to
all  significant comments on the draft
permit  made during  the comment pe-
riod, or hearing, if held; and
  (iii) Be made available to the public.
  (i) Public hearings.  (1) The  Regional
Administrator shall hold a public hear-
ing whenever  he  finds a significant
amount of public interest in a draft
permit, based on  the  requests  sub-
mitted, or at his discretion.
  (2) Any person may submit oral  or
written  statements  and data  con-
cerning the draft permit. The public
comment  period shall be automatically
extended  to  the close  of any public
hearing held,  or may be extended  by
the hearing officer at the hearing.
  (3) A tape recording or written tran-
script  of  the hearing  shall  be made
available to the public.
  (g) Reopening  of the comment period.
(1) If any  of the information submitted
during  the  public  comment  period
raises substantial new questions about
a permit, the Regional Administrator
may:
  (i) Prepare a new draft permit;
  (ii)  Prepare a revised statement of
basis; or
  (iii) Reopen the comment period.
  (2) Comments submitted during a re-
opened  comment period shall  be  lim-
ited to  the substantial new questions
that caused its reopening.
  (3) Public notice  about  any  of  the
above actions shall be given and shall
define the  scope of the new questions
raised.
  (h) Issuance and effective date of a per-
mit. (1) After the close of the comment
period on a draft permit, the Regional
Administrator shall  make  a final per-
mit  decision.  The Regional Adminis-
trator shall notify the  applicant and
each  person who commented  or  re-
quested to receive notice. The notice
shall  include  reference  to  the proce-
dures for appealing a permit decision.
  (2) A  final permit  decision shall be-
come effective 30 days after giving no-
tice of the decision unless:
  (i) A  later date is specified  in  the
notice;
  (ii)   Review   is   requested  under
§147.2929(j); or
  (iii) No comments requested a change
in the draft permit,  in which case  the
permit  is effective immediately upon
issuance.
  (i) Stays of contested permit conditions.
If a request for review of  a final UIC
permit §147.2929(j) is  granted, the effect
of  the  contested  permit  conditions
shall be stayed and shall not be subject
to judicial  review pending final agency
action. If the permit involves a new in-
jection  well or project,  the applicant
shall be without a permit for the pro-
posed well pending final agency action.
Uncontested provisions which  are not
severable from those contested provi-
sions  shall be stayed  with the  con-
tested provisions.
  (j) Appeal of permits. (1)  Any person
who filed comments on  the draft per-
mit or participated in the public hear-
ing may petition the Administrator to
review any condition of the permit de-
cision.  Any person who failed  to  file
comments or participate in the hearing
may petition for administrative review
                                    818

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.3000
only to the extent of the changes from
the  preliminary permit to  the final
permit decision.
  (2) A person may request review of a
final  permit decision within 30 days
after a  final permit decision has been
issued. The 30-day period within which
a  person may request review  begins
with  the service of notice of the Re-
gional Administrator's final permit de-
cision unless a later date is specified in
that notice.
  (3)  The  petition  requesting review
shall include:
  (i) A demonstration that the petition
is eligible under the requirements  of
paragraph (j)(l) of  this section; and,
when appropriate,
  (ii)  A showing that the condition  in
question is based on:
  (A)  A  finding- of fact or conclusion of
law that is clearly erroneous; or
  (B)  An exercise of discretion or im-
portant policy consideration which the
Administrator,   in   his  discretion,
should review.
  (4) The Administrator may also de-
cide,  on his initiative,  to review any
condition  of any  UIC  permit  issued
under these requirements. The Admin-
istrator must act under this paragraph
within 30 days  of the date notice was
given of the Regional Administrator's
action.
  (5)  Within a  reasonable time  fol-
lowing the filing of the petition for re-
view, the Administrator shall issue an
order either granting or denying the
request.  To the extent  that  review  is
denied, the conditions of the  final per-
mit decision become final agency ac-
tion.
  (6) Public notice shall be given by the
Regional Administrator of any grant of
a review petition by the Administrator.
Notice shall be  sent to the applicant,
the person requesting the  review, ap-
propriate persons on the Osage County
mailing list and to newspapers of gen-
eral circulation in the county. Included
in the notice shall be a  briefing sched-
ule for the appeal and a statement that
any interested person may file an ami-
cus brief. Notice of denial of the review
petition  will be sent only  to  the per-
son(s) requesting the review.
  (7) A petition  to the Administrator,
under paragraphs (j) (1) and (2) of this
section is a prerequisite to the seeking
of judicial review of the final agency
action. For purposes of judicial review,
final agency action occurs when a final
UIC permit is issued or  denied by  the
Regional Administrator and agency re-
view procedures are exhausted. A final
permit decision shall be issued by  the
Regional Administrator:
  (i) When the Administrator issues no-
tice to the parties involved that review
has been denied;
  (ii) When the Administrator issues a
decision  on the merits  of the appeal
and the decision does not include a re-
mand of the proceedings; or
  (iii) Upon the completion of the re-
mand proceedings  if  the proceedings
are remanded,  unless  the Administra-
tor's  remand order  specifically  pro-
vides that the appeal of the remand de-
cision will be required to exhaust  the
administrative remedies.

Subpart  HHH—Lands  of the Nav-
    ajo, Ute Mountain Ute, and All
    Other New Mexico Tribes

  SOURCE: 53 FE 43104, Oct. 25, 1988, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 147.3000 EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
Indian lands of the  Navajo,  the  Ute
Mountain Ute (Class II  wells only on
Ute Mountain  Ute lands in Colorado
and all  wells  on Ute Mountain  Ute
lands in Utah and New Mexico), and all
wells  on  other Indian lands in New
Mexico is administered by EPA. (The
term  "Indian  lands"  is  defined at 40
CPR 144.3.) The Navajo Indian lands are
in the States of Arizona, New Mexico,
and Utah; and the Ute Mountain Ute
lands are in Colorado,  New Mexico and
Utah.  This program consists of the UIC
program  requirements of 40 CFR parts
124, 144, 146, 148, and additional require-
ments  set forth  in  the  remainder of
this subpart.  The  additions and modi-
fications of this subpart  apply only to
the  Indian   lands  described  above.
Injection  well  owners and  operators,
and EPA shall comply with  these  re-
quirements.
                                    819

-------
§147.3001
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (b) Effective date. The effective date
for the UIC program on these lands is
November 25, 1988.

[53 PR 43104, Oct. 25, 1988, as amended at 56
FR 9422, Mar. 6, 1991]

§ 147.3001 Definition.
  Area of review. For the purposes of
this subpart, area of review means the
area surrounding an injection well or
project area described according to the
criteria  set forth in  §147.3009 of this
subpart.

§147.3002 Public notice of permit ac-
    tions.
  An applicant shall give public notice
of his  intention to apply for a permit
as follows:
  (a) Prior to  submitting an applica-
tion to  the Director,  the   applicant
shall  give  notice to  each  landowner,
tenant, and  operator of a  producing
lease within  one-half  mile of the well
and to the affected Tribal Government.
The notice shall include:
  (1) Name and address of applicant;
  (2) A brief description of the planned
injection activities including well loca-
tion, name and depth of the injection
zone, maximum injection pressure and
volume,  and  source  and description of
the fluid to be injected;
  (3) Name, address,  and phone number
of the EPA contact person; and
  (4) A statement that opportunity to
comment will be announced to the pub-
lic after EPA prepares a draft permit.
  (b) In addition to the requirements of
§144.31(e) of this  chapter, a permit ap-
plicant shall submit  a  description of
the way the  notice was given and the
names and addresses of those to whom
it was given.
  (c) Upon  written  request  and sup-
porting  documentation,  the Director
may waive  the requirement in para-
graph  (a) of  this section to give indi-
vidual notice of intent to apply for per-
mits in an area where it would be im-
practical. However,  notice to the af-
fected  Tribal government shall not be
waived.
  (d) The Director shall also provide to
the affected Tribal government all no-
tices given to State governments under
§ 124.10(c) of this chapter.
§ 147.3003 Aquifer exemptions.
  (a)  Aquifer exemptions in  connection
with Class II wells.  In accordance with
§144.7(b) and §146.4  of this chapter, the
portions of  authorized injection zones
into which  existing Class II wells are
currently injecting which are described
in appendix A  are hereby  exempted.
The exempted aquifers are defined by a
one-quarter mile radius from the exist-
ing injection well.  The  exemption in-
cludes the intended injection zone only
and is solely for the purpose of Class II
injection.
  (b) Class III wells. In addition to the
requirements  of  §144.7(c)(l)  of this
chapter, an  applicant  for  a uranium
mining permit  which necessitates an
aquifer exemption shall submit a plug-
ging and abandonment plan containing
an aquifer cleanup  plan, acceptable to
the Director, describing the  methods or
techniques that will be used to meet
the standards of §147.3011. The cleanup
plan shall include an analysis of pre-in-
jection water quality for the constitu-
ents required by the Director.  "The Di-
rector shall consider the cleanup plan
in addition to the other information re-
quired  for  permit  applications  under
§§144.31(e) and 146.34 of this chapter.

§147.3004 Duration of rule authoriza-
   tion for  existing Class  I  and in
   wells.
  Notwithstanding  §144.21(a)(3)(i)(B) of
this  chapter, authorization  by rule for
existing Class I and III wells will expire
90 days after the effective date of this
UIC program unless a complete permit
application  has  been submitted to the
Director.

§147.3005 Radioactive waste injection
   wells.
  Notwithstanding  §§144.24 and 146.51(b)
of this chapter, owners and operators
of wells used to dispose of  radioactive
waste (as defined in 10 CPR  part 20, ap-
pendix  B, table II, but not including
high level  and transuranic waste  and
spent nuclear fuel  covered  by 40 CFR
part 191) shall comply with  the permit-
ting requirements pertaining to Class I
wells in parts 124,  144 and  146 of this
chapter, as modified and supplemented
by this subpart.
                                     820

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §147.3009
§147.3006  Injection pressure for exist-
    ing Class  II  wells  authorized by
    rule.
  (a) Rule-authorised Class II saltwater
disposal  wells.  In addition to  the re-
quirements  of §144.28(f)(3)(ii)  of this
chaptei1, the owner or operator  shall,
except during-  well stimulation, use an
injection  pressure  measured  at the
wellhead that  is not greater than the
pressure calculated by  using the fol-
lowing- formula:
Pm=0.2d
where:
Pm=injection  pressure  at  the wellhead  in
  pounds per square inch
d=depth In  feet  to the  top of the Injection
  zone.

Owners  and  operators  shall  comply
with this  requirement  no later  than
one year after  the effective date of this
program.
  (b) Rule-authorised  Class II enhanced
recovery and hydrocarbon  storage  wells.
(1)  In addition to the requirements  of
§ 144.28(f)(3)(ii)  of  this chapter, owners
and operators shall  use  an  injection
pressure no  greater than  the  pressure
established by  the Director for the field
or  formation in which the well  is lo-
cated.  The  Director shall  establish
such maximum pressure  after notice
(including  notice to the affected Tribe),
opportunity  for comment, and oppor-
tunity for  public hearing  according to
the provisions  of part 124,  subpart A, of
this chapter, and shall  inform owners
and operators and the affected Tribe in
writing  of the  applicable  maximum
pressure; or
  (2) An owner or operator may inject
at  a pressure greater than that speci-
fied in paragraph (b)(l)  of this section
for the field or formation in .which he is
operating after demonstrating in writ-
ing to the  satisfaction of  the Director
that  such  injection pressure will not
violate     the    requirements    of
§144.28(f)(3)(ii)  of this chapter. The Di-
rector may grant such a request after
notice (including notice  to the affected
Tribe),  opportunity for  comment and
opportunity  for a public  hearing ac-
cording to the provisions of part 124,
subpart A of this chapter.
  (3) Prior to the  time that the Direc-
;or establishes rules for maximum in-
 ection pressure under paragraph  (b)(l)
of this section  the owner  or  operator
shall:
  (i)  Limit  injection  pressure  to a
value  which will not exceed the oper-
ating  requirements of  § 144.28(f)(3)(ii);
and
  (ii) Submit data acceptable to the Di-
rector which defines the fracture pres-
sure of the formation  in which injec-
tion is taking place. A single submis-
sion may be made on behalf of two or
more operators conducting- operations
in the same field and formation, if the
Director approves.  The data  shall  be
submitted  to the Director within one
year of the effective date  of this pro-
gram.

§ 147.3007  Application for a permit.
  (a)   Notwithstanding   the  require-
ments of §144.31(c)(l)  of this  chapter,
the owner or operator  of  an existing
Class I or III well shall submit a com-
plete permit application no later than
90 days after the  effective  date  of the
program.
  (b)  The  topographic  map (or  other
map if a topographic map is  unavail-
able) required by  §144.31(e)(7) of this
chapter, shall  extend two  miles from
Class II wells, and 2Va miles from Class
I and III wells. These maps will show
all the information listed in paragraph
144.31(e)(7)  within Vn mile for Class II
wells and 2Vfe miles for Class I and III
wells.

§147.3008  Criteria for  aquifer exemp-
    tions.
  The  aquifer  exemption  criterion  in
§146.4(c) of this chapter shall not  be
available for this program.

§ 147.3009  Area of review.
  The area of review shall be defined as
follows:
  (a) Class  II wells. The  area of review
for Class II permits and area permits
shall be defined by a fixed radius as de-
scribed in  §146.6(b) (1)  and (2) of this
chapter except that the radius shall be
one-half mile.
  (b) Class  I and III wells. The area of
review for Class I and III wells are well
fields which may be either:
  (I) An area defined by a radius two
and one-half miles from  the well  or
well field; or
                                     821

-------
§147.3010
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (2) An area one-quarter mile from the
well or well  field where the well field
production at the times exceeds injec-
tion to produce a net withdrawal; or
  (3) A suitable distance, not less than
one-quarter  mile,  proposed  by  the
owner or operator and approved by the
Director based  upon  a mathematical
calculation   such  as  that  found  in
§146.6(a)(2) of this chapter.

§ 147.3010 Mechanical integrity tests.
  The monitoring of annulus pressure
listed in §146.8(b)(l) of this chapter will
only  be  acceptable if preceded by a
pressure test, using liquid or gas that
clearly  demonstrates that mechanical
integrity exists at the time of the pres-
sure test.

§147.3011  Plugging and abandonment
    of Class III wells.
  To   meet   the   requirements   of
§146.10(d)  of  this chapter, owners  and
operators of  Class III uranium projects
underlying or in aquifers containing up
to 5,000 mg/1  TDS which have been ex-
empted under §146.4  of  this  chapter
shall:
  (a) Include in the required plugging
and abandonment plan a plan for aqui-
fer  clean-up and   monitoring  which
demonstrates adequate  protection of
surrounding USDWs.
  (1) The Director shall include in each
such  permit  for a  Class  III uranium
project the concentrations of contami-
nants  to  which  aquifers  must  be
cleaned up   in order  to  protect sur-
rounding USDWs.
  (2) The concentrations will be  set as
close as is feasible to the original con-
ditions.
  (b)  When   requesting permission to
plug a well, owners and operators shall
submit  for the  Director's approval a
schedule  for  the  proposed  aquifer
cleanup, in addition to the information
required by §146.34(c).
  (c) Cleanup and monitoring  shall be
continued until  the owner or operator
certifies that no constituent listed in
the permit exceeds  the concentrations
required by the permit, and  the  Direc-
tor notifies  the  permittee in writing
that  cleanup activity  may  be termi-
nated.
§ 147.3012 Construction  requirements
   for Class I wells.
  In addition to the cementing require-
ment  of § 146.12(b) of this chapter, own-
ers and operators of Class I wells shall,
through circulation, cement all casing
to the surface.

§ 147.3013 Information  to be consid-
   ered for Class I  wells.
  (a)  In  addition  to the  information
listed in §146.14(a)  of this chapter, the
Director shall  consider  the following
prior to issuing any Class I permit:
  (1) Expected pressure changes, native
fluid  displacement, and  direction of
movement of the injected fluid; and
  (2) Methods to be used for sampling,
and for measurement and calculation
of now.
  (b)  In  addition  to the  information
listed in §146.14(b)  of this chapter, the
Director shall  consider  any informa-
tion required under  §146.14(a) of this
chapter (as supplemented by this sub-
part)  that has been gathered  during
construction.

§ 147.3014 Construction  requirements
   for Class III wells.
  (a) In addition to  the requirements of
§146.32(c)(3)   of  this  chapter,   radio-
logical characteristics of the formation
fluids shall be provided to the Director.
  (b) In addition to  the requirements of
§ 146.32(e) of this chapter, the Director
may  require monitoring wells  to  be
completed into USDWs below the injec-
tion zone if those  USDWs may  be af-
fected by mining operations.

§ 147.3015 Information  to be consid-
   ered for Class III wells.
  (a) In addition to  the requirements of
§ 146.34(a) of this chapter, the following
information shall be considered by the
Director:
  (1) Proposed construction procedures,
including a cementing and casing pro-
gram,  logging procedures,  deviation
checks, and a drilling, testing and cor-
ing program.
  (2) Depth  to the proposed injection
zone,  and a chemical, physical and ra-
diological analysis  of the ground water
in the proposed  injection  zone suffi-
cient   to  define  pre-injection  water
quality as required for aquifer cleanuj
by §147.3011 of this subpart.
                                     822

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
           Pt. 147, Subpt. HHH, App. A
  (3)  An  aquifer  cleanup  plan if re-
quired by §147.3003(b) of this subpart.
  (4)  Any additional information  that
may be necessary to demonstrate  that
cleanup will reduce  the level  of  con-
taminants in the surrounding-  USDWs
as close as feasible to the original  con-
ditions.
  (b) In addition to the requirements of
§ 146.34(b)  of this chapter, the Director
shall   consider  any  information  re-
quired under §146.34(a) of this  chapter
(as supplemented by  this subpart)  that
has been gathered during construction.
§147.3016  Criteria and standards  ap-
    plicable to Class V wells.
  In addition to the criteria and- stand-
ards applicable to  Class  V  wells  set
forth in subpart P of part 146 of this
chapter, owners and operators of wells
that do not  fall within the Class IV
category taut that are used to dispose of
radioactive wastes  (as  defined  in  10
CFR part 20, appendix B, table II, col-
umn 2, but not including high level and
transuranic wastes  and spent nuclear
fuel covered by 40  CFR part 191) shall
comply with  all of the requirements
applicable  to Class I injection wells in
40 CFR parts 124, 144 and 146 as supple-
mented by this subpart.
 APPENDIX A TO SUBPART HHH OF PART 147—EXEMPTED AQUIFERS IN NEW MEXICO

 The areas described by a one-quarter mile radius around the following Class II wells in the
listed formations are exempted for the purpose of Class II injection.
                                    Sec
                                  Well
                                  No
                Arco Oil & Gas Co —Operator/Horseshoe Gallup—Field/Gallup—Formation
SEINE
NW/NW
SE/SW
NW/SE
SE/NW
NW/NW . .
NW/SW
NW/SE
SE/SE
NW/NW . . .
NW/NE . .
NW/NE
NW/NW
NW/SW
NW/SE . . .
SE/SW .
NW/SW
SE/NW .
NW/NE
NW/NE
NW/NE
SE/NE
SE/SE
NE/SW .
NE/NW
SE/NW ....
SE/SE .
SE/NE
SE/NW . ...
NW/SE 	
SE/SW . 	
NW/SW
SE/SW . . . . .
NW/NW . .
SE/SE 	
NW/SW . . ...
SE/NW
SE/NW
NW/SW . . . .
NE/SE
NW/SW 	
5
30
28
33
35
4
33
27
30
34
34
2
29
13
29
27
35
30
31
4
29
34
31
14
14
10
29
30
29
25
32
... 30
	 13
27
28
29
34
29
27
23
... 24
T30N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T30N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T30N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
731 N
T31N
T31N
T30N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T30N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
T31N
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R17W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R17W
R17W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R17W
R16W
R16W
R17W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R16W
R17W
R17W
1650'FNL
660'FNL
790'FSL
1710'FSL
2105'FNL
455'FNL
1980'FSL
1980'FSL
660'FSL
730'FNL
813'FNL
720'FNL
660'FNL
1975'FSL
1980TSL
660'FSL
1980'FSL
1980'FNL
660'FNL
330'FNL
660'FNL
1990'FNL
640'FSL
2250'FSL
625'FNL
1900'FNL
560'FSL
1980'FNL
2080'FNL
1980'FSL
660'FSL
2021 'FSL
660'FSL
520'FNL
660'FSL
1980'FSL
2310'FNL
660'FSL
1650'FSL
1880'FSL
2050'FSL
330'FEL
703'FWL
2150'FWL
2310'FEL
2105'FWL
4435'FEL
386'FWL
2080'FEL
660'FEL
515'FWL
2036'FEL
2040'FEL
660'FWL
670'FWL
1980'FEL
1980'FWL
660'FWL
2061 'FWL
1980'FEL
2160'FEL
1980'FEL
645'FEL
660'FEL
2630' FWL
1995'FWI,
2080'FWL

660'FEL
1980'FWL
1980'FEL
1980'FWL
742' FWL
1980'FWL
660'FWL
660'FEL
660'FWL
1650' FWL
1980'FWL
330'FWL
340'FEL
990'FWL
134
8
167
199
196
219
65
164
5
180
182
229
24
77
22
171
205
7
17
221
26
194
27
94
69
271
21
10
23
122
14
19
82
150
169
11
192
12
162
96
97
                                     823
      203-160  D-27

-------
Pt. 147, Subpt. HHH, App. A
40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                              Sec.
                               Wei!
                               No.
SE/NW 	       4        T30N  R16W    2060'FNL   1710'FWL     232
NW/NW 	      31        T31N  R16W     620'FNL    701'FWL      30
NW/SE 	      35        T31N  R16W    1980'FSL    1980'FEL     207
SE/NE   	        32        T31N  R16W    1980'FNL     417'FEL      20
NE/NW 	       28        T31N  R16W    1980'FNL    1980'FEL     152
NE/NW 	      34        T31N  R16W    2140'FSL    735'FWL     201
SE/NW 	        3        T30N  R16W    2310'FNL   1640'FWL     236
SE/SW	      34        T31N  R16W     660'FSL   1980'FWL     213
NW/NE  	       30        T31N  R16W     660'FNL    1980TFL       9
SE/SW	       26        T31N  R16W     660'FSL   1980'FWL     175
NW/SE  	      30        T31N  R16W    1980'FSL    1980'FEL       6
SE/NW 	       9        T30N  R16W    1650'FNL   2131'FWL     264
NW/SW 	       4        T30N  R16W    2310'FSL    4390'FEL     242
NW/SW 	       2        T30N  R16W    1980'FSL    660'FWL     250
NW/NW 	        33        T31N  R16W     660'FNL    386'FWL      66
NE/NE 	      15        T31N  R17W     660'FNL     660'FEL      67
NW/NE 	       33        T31N  R16W     660'FNL    1980TEL     178
NW/SE  	      24        T31N  R17W    1875TSL    1900TEL      99
NW/NE 	      28        T31N  R16W     660'FNL    1980'FEL     148
NW/NW	      19        T31N  R16W     680'FNL    682'FWL      89
NW/SE  	       4        T30N  R16W    1820'FSL    2130'FEL     244
SE/SW	      20        T31N  R16W     660'FSL   1980'FWL     115
NW/NE 	      25        T31N  R17W     660'FNL    1980'FEL     118
SE/SW	        4        T30N  R16W     660'FSL    3300'FEL     253
NW/SW 	        19        T31N  R16W    1980'FSL    706'FWL     101
NW/SE  	      32        T31N  R16W    1950'FSL    1980'FEL      22
NW/NW 	        35        T31N  R16W     605'FNL    690'FWL     184
SE/NE   	      29        T31N  R16W    1980'FNL     417'FEL      25
SE/NW 	       19        T31N  R16W    1980'FNL   2023'FWL      95
NW/NW 	      32        T31N  R16W     660'FNL    660'FWL       4
SE/SW  	       24        T31N  R17W     660'FSL    3300TEL     107
SE/NE   	        28        T31N  R16W    2105'FNL     940TEL     154
NW/NE  	       35        T31N  R16W     610'FNL    2000'FEL     186
SE/SW	       5        T31N  R16W     990'FSL   2310'FWL     139
NW/SE    	       28        T31N  R16W    1980'FSL    1980'FEL     160
SE/SE	      33        T31N  R16W     330'FSL     990'FEL     211
NW/NE   	       5        T30N  R16W     330'FNL    1650'FEL     128
SE/NW 	        27        T31N  R16W    1900'FNL   2050'FWL     156
SE/SW	       35        T31N  R16W     660'FSL   1980'FWL     217
NW/NW 	      10        T30N  R16W     526'FNL    330'FWL     265
NE/SW 	      21        T31N  R16W    1880'FSL   1980'FWL     143
NW/NE 	         24        T31N  R17W     409'FNL    1914TEL      87
NW/SW 	       32        T31N  R16W    1980'FSL    660'FWL      15
SE/SE  	       34        T31N  R16W     960'FSL     910'FEL     215
SW/SE 	      21        T31N  R16W     820'FSL    1820'FEl.     145
SE/SE  	       27        T31N  R16W     610'FSL     640'FEL.     173
NW/SW  	       3        T30N  R16W    1920'FSL    350'FWL     246
SE/SW 	       19        T31N  R16W     601'FSL   2002'FWL     111
SW/SE	       14        T31N  R17W     330'FSL    1900'FEl.      79
NW/NW 	       27        T31N  R16W     520'FNL    660'FWL     150
SE/NW  	        31        T31N  R16W    1724'FNL   2067'FWL      29
NW/NE    	      32        T31N  R16W     660'FNL    1980TEI      13
SE/NE	      24        T31N  R17W    1998'FNL     702'FEL      93
NW/NW  	        5        T30N  R16W     660'FNL    660'FWL     126
NW/SW 	       28        T31N  R16W    1740'FSL    590'FWL     158
SE/NE  	        31        T31N  R16W    1980'FNL     660'FEL      16
NW/NW 	      24        T31N  R17W     660'FNL    760'FWL      85

                 Energy Reserve Backup Inc —Operator/Horseshoe Gallup—Field/Gallup—Formation

SE/SE	        5        T31N  R17W     660'FSL     660'FEL       4
NE/SW     	      10        T30N  R16W    1970'FSL   2210'FWL      31
SE/NW 	      11        T30N  R16W    2090'FNL    2190TWI      29
SE/SE	       10        T30N  R16W     700'FSL     500'FEL      37

                       Solar Petraelurn Inc —Operator/Horseshoe—Field/Gallup—Formation

SW/SE	      11        T31N  R17W     736'FSL    2045'FEL     205
SE/NE 	       9        T31N  R17W    1980'FNL     660'FEL     122
NW/SE 	        4        T31N  R17W     1980'FSL    1980'FFL     127
NE/NE	       10        T31N  R17W     660'FNL     660'FEL     136
SE/SW	       4        T31N  R17W     660'FSL    1980'FWL     125
SW/NW 	       11        T31N  R17W    2300'FNL     660'FWL     206
                                                824

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
Pt. 147, Subpt. HHH, App. A

NW/SW .
SE/NW 	
NW/NW
SW/NE
SW/NW
SW/SW
SW/SE
SE/NE .
NE/NE
SE/SE
NE/NW
SW/SW
NW/SE .
SW/SE . .
NW/NE .
NE/SW
NE/SW
SE/NW
NW/SW ..
SW/SW .
NW/NW
SE/SE
Sec
4
.. . 4
4
10
... 10
10
	 3
..... 5
5
9
10
	 11
	 9
10
	 9
10
	 .. 11
.... 9
	 3
3
. . 9
	 4

T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R16W
T31N R17W

1980'FSL
1989'FNL
660'FNL
1 980'FNL
1980'FNL
660'FSL
330'FSL
1980'FNL
1 950'FNL
990'FSL
660'FNL
660'FSL
1 980'FSL
990'FSL
660'FNL
1980'FSL
1980'FSL
1980'FNL
1980'FSL
560'FSL
660'FNL
660'FSL

660'FWL
1980'FWL
660'FWL
1980'FEL
660'FWL
660'FWL
2310'FEL
660'FEL
1050'FEL
850'FEL
1980'FWL
660'FWL
1980'FEL
1980'FEL
1980'FEL
1980'FWL
1980'FWL
1980'FWL
660'FWL
660'FWL
660'FWL
660'FEL
Well
No
103
128
101
117
108
114
143
302
307
140
118
204
115
144
123
109
203
134
132
110
133
124
WTR Oil Co — Operator/Horseshoe Gallup — Field/Gallup — Formation
NE/SW .
33
T32N R17W
1980'FSL
1989'FWL
2
Arco Oil & Gas Co — Operator/Many Rocks Gallup — Field/Gallup — Formation
NW/NW
SW/NE . . ..
NW/SE
SW/NE . .. .
NE/SW
NE/NW . . .
NE/NE .
SE/SW .
SE/SE
NE/SW
SW/SW
SW/NW
NW/SW
7
. . . 17
.... 17
.... . 7
. . . . . 8
17
... . 18
	 7
17
... 17
6
17
.... 17
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
T31N R16W
898'FNL
1673'FNL
1890'FSL
2310'FNL
1650'FSL
660'FNL
360'FNL
716'FSL
660'FSL
2040'FSL
330'FSL
2073'FNL
1967'FSL
500'FWL
1789'FEL
2150'FEL
2310'FEL
1650'FWL
2030' FWL
855'FEL
2185'FWL
660'FEL
2070'FWL
330'FWL
641 'FWL
981 'FWL
2
21
23
6
12
18
16
13
26
22
1
19
8
James P Woosley — Operator/Many Rocks Gallup — Field/Gallup — Formation
NW/NE
SW/SW
SW/NW
SW/NW .
NE/SW
NE/SE ...
SW/SE
NE/SE .
20
27
17
... 27
27
. .. . 18
27
. ... 28
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
330'FNL
660'FSL
2310'FWL
260' FWL
1980'FSL
2474'FSL
625'FNL
1980'FSL
2310'FEL
990'FWL
330'FWL
1 360'FNL
1980'FWL
133'FEL
2000'FEL
330'FEL
13
1
4
11
6
18
3
12
Solar Petroleum Inc — Operator/Many Rocks Galtup — Field/Gallup — Formation
SE/NW
NW/NE
SE/NE
NW/SW
SE/NE
1
2
2
1
	 12
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
T31N R17W
1980'FNL
805'FNL
1980'FNL
2310'FSL
1820'FNL
1980'FWL
940'FEL
660'FEL
990'FNL
500'FEL
216
215
218
223
217
WTR Oil Co — Operator/Many Rocks Gallup — Field/Gallup — Formation
NW/NW
SE/SE
SE/NE
SE/NW
NW/SE
	 35
	 . 35
34
	 .. . 35
35
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
T32N R17W
T32N R16W
T32N R17W
810'FNL
660'FSL
775'FEL
1980'FNL
1980'FSL
510'FWL
660'FEL
1980'FNL
1980'FWL
1980'FEL
11
6
8
9
7
Chaco Oil Co — Operator/Red Mtn Meseverde — Field/Menefee — Formation
NE/NE
SE/SW
	 29
20
T20N R9W
T20N R9W
395'FNL
442'FSL
1265'FEL
2430'FWL
6
17
                                825

-------
§147.3100
                                       40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
                                    Sec.
                                                               Well
                                                               No.
              Geo Engineering Inc.—Operator/Red Mtn Meseverde—Field/Menefee—Formation
NW/NE 	
NE/NE 	
SE/NW 	
NW/NE 	
NE/NW 	
SW/SE 	
NE/NE 	
SE/SE 	
SE/SE 	
NW/NE 	
SE/SE 	
	 29
	 29
	 29
	 29
	 29
	 20
	 29
	 20
	 20
	 29
	 20
T20N
T20N
T20N
T20N
T20N
T20N
T20N
T20N
T20N
T20N
T20N
R9W
R9W
R9W
R9W
R9W
R9W
R9W
R9W
R9W
R9W
R9W
160'FNL
225'FNL
1344'FNL
615'FNL
834'FNL
265TSL
5'FNL
450'FSL
990TSL
1115'FNL
1085TSL
2135'FEL
1265'FEL
2555'FWL
1920TEL
2113'FWL
2150'FEL
1130'FEL
1145'FEL
1280'FEL
2325'FEL
860'FEL
35
7
20
5
21
36
8
24
10
22
12
             Tesoro Petroleum Co.—Operator/S Hospah Lower Sand—Field/Hospah—Formation
NW/SE
SW/SE
SW/SW 	
SE/SW 	

6
6
	 6
	 6

T17N R8W
T17N R8W
T17N R8W
T17N R8W

2310'FSL
990'FSL
5'FSL
5'FSL

2310'FEL
2310'FFI
20'FWI
2635'FWI

28
34
18
20

   Subpart III—Lands of Certain
      Oklahoma Indian Tribes

  SOURCE: 53 FR 43109,  Oct.  25, 1988, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 147.3100  EPA-administered program.
  (a) Contents. The UIC program for the
Indian lands in Oklahoma,  except for
that covering the Class II wells of the
Five Civilized Tribes,  is administered
by EPA. The UIC program for all wells
on Indian  lands in Oklahoma, except
Class II wells on the Osage Mineral Re-
serve (found at 40 CFR part 147,  Sub-
part GGG)  and the Class II program for
the Five Civilized Tribes, consists  of
the UIC program  requirements  of  40
CFR parts 124,  144, 146, 148, and addi-
tional requirements set forth in the re-
mainder of this subpart. Injection well
owners  and operators, and  EPA shall
comply with these requirements.
  (b) Effective date.  The effective  date
for the UIC program for all wells on In-
dian lands except Class II wells on the
Osage  Mineral  Reserve  and  Class  II
wells on the lands of the Five  Civilized
Tribes is November 25,1988.
[53 PR 43109, Oct. 25,  1988, as amended at 56
FR 9422, Mar. 6, 1991]
§ 147.3101
    tions.
Public notice of permit ac-
  (a) In addition to the notice require-
ments of § 124.10 of this chapter, the Di-
rector shall provide  to  the  affected
Tribal government all notices given to
an  affected  State government under
§124.10(c) of this chapter.
  (b) Class I and III wells. In addition to
the notice requirements of §124.10  of
this chapter:
  (1) Owners and operators  of Class I
and III wells shall notify the affected
Tribal government prior to submitting
an application  for a permit, shall pub-
lish such notice in at least two news-
papers  of  general circulation in the
area of the  proposed well, and  shall
broadcast notice over at least one local
radio station.
  (2) The Director shall publish a no-
tice of availability of a draft permit in
at least two  newspapers of general cir-
culation in  the  area  of  the proposed
well, and broadcast notice over at least
one local radio station. The public no-
tice shall allow at least 45 days for pub-
lic comment.
  (c) Class  II wells. In addition to the
notice requirements of §124.10 of this
chapter:
  (1) Owners and operators of Class II
wells shall give notice  of application
for a permit  to the affected Tribal gov-
ernment prior to submitting the appli-
cation to the Director.
  (2) In addition to the public notice re-
quired  for  each  action  listed   in
§124.10(a) of  this chapter,  the  Director
shall also publish notice in a daily  or
weekly newspaper of  general circula-
tion in the  affected area  for actions
concerning Class II wells.
                                     826

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                           §147.3107
§147.3102  Plugging and  abandonment
    plans.
  In  lieu  of  the  requirements  of
§144.28(c)(l) and (2) (i)-(rii) of this chap-
ter,  owners and operators of Class II
wells shall comply with the plugging
and    abandonment    provisions   of
§ 147.3108 of this subpart.

§ 147.3103  Fluid seals.
  Notwithstanding  §§ 144.28(f)(2)   and
146.12(c) of this chapter, owners and op-
erators shall not use a fluid seal as an
alternative to a packer.

§ 147.3104  Notice of abandonment.
  (a) In addition to the notice required
by  §144.28(j)(2) of  this  chapter,  the
owner or operator shall at the same
time  submit  plugging information in
conformance with § 147.3108 of this sub-
part including:
  (1) Type and number of plugs;
  (2) Elevation of top and bottom of
each plug;
  (3) Method of plug placement; and
  (4) Type, grade  and  quantity of ce-
ment to be used.
  (b) In addition to the permit condi-
tions specified in  §§144.51 and 144.52 of
this chapter, each owner and operator
shall submit and each permit shall con-
tain the  following information (in con-
formance  with §146.3108 of this  sub-
part):
  (1) Type and number of plugs;
  (2) Elevation of top and bottom of
each plug;
  (3) Method of plug placement; and
  (4) Type, grade  and  quantity of ce-
ment to be used.

§147.3105  Plugging and  abandonment
    report.
  (a) In lieu of the time periods for sub-
mitting a plugging report in §144.28(k)
of this chapter, owners and operators
of Class I and III wells shall submit the
report within 15 days of plugging the
well and owners or operators of Class II
wells within 30 days  of plugging, or at
the time  of the  next required oper-
ational report (whichever is less.) If the
required operational  report is due  less
than  15  days following completion of
plugging,  then the  plugging report
shall be  submitted within  30 days for
Class II  wells  and 15 days for Class I
and III wells.
  (b) In addition to the requirement of
§144.28(k)(l) of this chapter, owners and
operators of Class II wells shall include
a statement that the well was plugged
in accordance with § 146.10 of this chap-
ter and § 147.3109 of this subpart, and, if
the actual  plugging differed, specify
the actual procedures used.
  (c) The schedule upon which reports
of  plugging  must be  submitted  are
changed from  those in  §144.51(o) to
those specified in  paragraph (a) of  this
section.

§147.3106 Area of review.
  (a) When determining the area of re-
view under § 146.6Cb) of this chapter, the
fixed  radius shall be no less than  one
mile for Class I wells and one-half mile
for Class II and III wells. In the case of
an  application  for an area  permit, de-
termination of  the area of review under
§146.6(b) shall be  a fixed width of not
less than  one  mile  for the  circum-
scribing area of Class  I projects  and
one-half mile  for the  circumscribing
area of Class II and III projects.
  (b)  However,  in lieu of  §146.6(c) of
this chapter, if the area of review is de-
termined by  a  mathematical model
pursuant to paragraph §146.6(a) of this
chapter, the permissible radius is the
result of such calculation even if it  is
less than one mile for Class I wells and
one-half for Class II and III wells.

§ 147.3107 Mechanical integrity.
  (a)  Monitoring  of  annulus  pressure
conducted pursuant to § 146.8(b)(l) shall
be preceded by an initial pressure test.
A  positive gauge  pressure on  the cas-
ing/tubing annulus (filled  with liquid)
shall  be maintained continuously.  The
pressure shall be monitored monthly.
  (b) Pressure tests conducted pursuant
to §146.8(b)(2) of this chapter  shall be
performed with a pressure  on  the cas-
ing/tubing annulus of at least  200 p.s.i.
unless otherwise specified by the Direc-
tor. In addition,  pressure tests con-
ducted  during  well operation  shall
maintain an injection/annulus  pressure
differential   of  at   least   100  p.s.i.
throughout the tubing length.
  (c) Monitoring  of enhanced recovery
wells     conducted     pursuant    to
§146.8(b)(3), must be preceded by an ini-
tial pressure test that was conducted
                                     827

-------
§ 147.3108
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
no more than 90 days prior to the com-
mencement of monitoring-.

§ 147.3108   Plugging Class I, II, and III
   wells.
  In  addition to the requirements  of
§146.10 of  this chapter, owners  and op-
erators shall  comply with the following'
when plugging a well:
  (a) For Class I and III wells:
  (1) The well shall be filled with mud
from the bottom of the well to a point
one hundred  (100) feet below the top of
the highest disposal or injection  zone
and  then  with a  cement  plug from
there to at least one hundred (100) feet
above the top of the disposal or injec-
tion zone.
  (2) A cement  plug shall also be set
from a point at least fifty (50) feet
below the shoe of the surface casing  to
a point at least five (5) feet above the
top of the lowest USDW.
  (3) A final  cement plug shall extend
from a point at least thirty feet below
the ground surface to a point five (5)
feet below the ground surface.
  (4) All intervals between plugs shall
be filled with mud.
  (5) The top  plug shall clearly show by
permanent markings inscribed in the
cement or on a steel plate embedded in
the cement the well permit number and
date of plugging.
  (b) For Class II wells:
  (1) The well shall be kept full of mud
as casing is removed. No surface casing
shall be removed without written ap-
proval  from the Director.
  (2) If surface casing is adequately set
and cemented through all USDWs (set
to at least 50 feet below the base of the
USDW), a plug shall be set at  least 50
feet below the  shoe of the casing and
extending  at least  50 feet above the
shoe of the casing; or
  (3) If the surface casing and cement-
ing is inadequate, the well bore shall  be
filled with cement from a point at least
50 feet below the base of the USDW  to
a point at least 50 feet above the  shoe
of the  surface casing, and any addi-
tional  plugs  as required  by the Direc-
tor.
  (4) In all cases, the top 20 feet of the
well bore below 3 feet of ground surface
shall be filled  with cement.  Surface
casing   shall  be cut off 3 feet below
ground surface and covered with a se-
cure steel  cap on  top  of the surface
pipe.  The  remaining 3  feet  shall be
filled with dirt.
  (5) Except  as provided in sub-para-
graph (b)(6) of this section, each pro-
ducing or receiving formation shall be
sealed off with at  least  a 50-foot ce-
ment plug placed at the base of the for-
mation  and at least  a  50-foot cement
plug placed at the top of the formation.
  (6) The requirement in sub-paragraph
(b)(5) of this section does not apply if
the  producing/receiving  formation  is
already sealed off from the well  bore
with  adequate casing and cementing
behind casing,  and  casing is not to be
removed, or the only openings from the
producing/receiving formation into the
well bore are perforations in the cas-
ing, and the  annulus between the cas-
ing and the outer walls of the well is
filled with  cement for a distance of 50
feet above the top of  the formation.
When such conditions exist,  a bridge
plug capped with at least 10 feet of ce-
ment set at  the  top  of the producing
formation may be used.
  (7) When specified  by the Director,
any uncased hole below the shoe of any
casing to be left in the well shall be
filled with cement to  a depth  of at
least 50 feet below  the casing shoe, or
the bottom of the hole, and the casing
above the shoe shall be filled with ce-
ment to at least 50  feet above the shoe
of the casing. If the well has a screen
or liner which is not to be removed, the
well bore shall be  filled  with cement
from the base of the screen or liner to
at least 50 feet above the  top of the
screen or liner.
  (8)  All intervals  between  cement
plugs in the well bore  must  be filled
with mud.
  (c) For the  purposes  of this section
mud shall be defined as: mud of not less
than thirty-six (36) viscosity (API Full
Funnel  Method)  and a weight o:E not
less than nine (9) pounds per gallon.

§ 147.3109 Timing of mechanical integ-
    rity test.
  The  demonstrations  of mechanical
integrity required  by  §146.14(b)(2)  of
this chapter  prior to approval for the
operation of a Class I well shall, for an
existing well,  be conducted no more
than 90 days  prior to application for
the permit and the results included in
                                    828

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                                §148.3
the permit application. The owner or
operator  shall  notify the Director at
least seven days in advance of the time
and date of the test so that  EPA ob-
servers may be present.

   PART 148—HAZARDOUS WASTE
      INJECTION RESTRICTIONS

           Subpart A—General

Sec.
148.1  Purpose, scope and applicability.
148.2  Definitions.
148.3  Dilution prohibited as a substitute for
    treatment.
148.4  Procedures for case-by-case extensions
    to an effective date.
148.5  Waste analysis.

    Subpart B—Prohibitions on Injection

148.10  Waste  specific  prohibitions—solvent
   wastes.
148.11  Waste  specific  prohibitions—dioxin-
   containing wastes.
148.12  Waste   specific   prohibitions—Cali-
   fornia list wastes.
148.14  Waste   specific   prohibitions—first
   third wastes.
148.15  Waste  specific  prohibitions—second
    third wastes.
148.16  Waste   specific  prohibitions—third
    third wastes.
148.17  Waste  specific  prohibitions;  newly
    listed wastes.
148.18  Waste   specific  prohibitions-newly
   listed and identified wastes.

    Subpart C—Petition Standards and
              Procedures
148.20  Petitions  to  allow injection  of  a
    waste prohibited under subpart B.
148.21  Information to be submitted in sup-
    port of petitions.
148.22  Requirements  for  petition submis-
    sion, review and approval or denial.
148.23  Review of exemptions granted pursu-
    ant to a petition.
148.24  Termination of approved petition.
  AUTHORITY: Sees. 3004, Resource Conserva-
tion and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901 el seq.
  SOURCE- 53 FR  28154, July 26, 1988, unless
otherwise noted.

        Subpart A—General

§ 148.1  Purpose,  scope and  applica-
    bility.
  (a)  This part  identifies  wastes that
are restricted from disposal into Class
I wells and defines those circumstances
under which a waste, otherwise prohib-
ited from injection, may be injected.
  (b)  The requirements of this  part
apply to owners or operators of Class I
hazardous waste injection wells used to
inject hazardous waste.
  (c) Wastes otherwise prohibited from
injection may continue  to be injected:
  (1) If  an extension from the effective
date of a prohibition has been  granted
pursuant to §148.4 with respect to such
wastes; or
  (2) If an exemption from  a prohibi-
tion has been  granted in response to a
petition filed under § 148.20 to allow in-
jection  of restricted wastes with re-
spect to those wastes and wells covered
by the exemption; or
  (3) If the waste is generated by a con-
ditionally exempt small quantity  gen-
erator,  as defined in §261.5; or
  (d) Wastes  that  are hazardous only
beca'use they exhibit  a hazardous char-
acteristic,  and  which  are  otherwise
prohibited under this part, or part 268
of this  chapter, are  not prohibited if
the wastes:
  (1) Are disposed into a nonhazardous
or hazardous injection well  as defined
under 40 CFR §146.6(a); and
  (2) Do not  exhibit any  prohibited
characteristic of hazardous waste iden-
tified in 40  CPR part 261, subpart C at
the point of injection.
[53 PR 28154,  July 26, 1988, as amended at 55
FR  22683, June  1, 1990;  57  PR 8088, Mar. 6,
1992; 57 FR 31763, July 20, 1992; 60 PR 33932,
June 29,  1995; 61 FR 15596, Apr. 8, 1996; 61 FR
33682, June 28, 1996]

§ 148.2  Definitions.
  Injection interval  means that part of
the injection zone in which the well is
screened, or in which the waste is oth-
erwise directly emplaced.
  Transmissive fault or fracture is a fault
or fracture that has sufficient perme-
ability  and  vertical extent  to allow
fluids to move between formations.

§ 148.3   Dilution prohibited  as a  sub-
    stitute for treatment.
  The prohibition of  §268.3 shall apply
to owners or operators  of Class I haz-
ardous waste injection wells.
                                       829

-------
§148.4
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
§ 148.4  Procedures for case-by-case ex-
    tensions to an effective date.
  The  owner  or  operator of a Class I
hazardous  waste injection well  may
submit an application to  the Adminis-
trator for an extension of the effective
date of any  applicable prohibition es-
tablished under subpart B of this part
according to the procedures of §268.5.

§ 148.5  Waste analysis.
  Generators  of hazardous wastes that
are disposed  of into  Class I injection
wells must comply with the applicable
requirements of §268.7 (a)  and (b). Own-
ers or operators of Class I hazardous
waste  injection wells must  comply
with  the  applicable  requirements  of
§268.7(c).

     Subpart B—Prohibitions on
               Injection

§148.10  Waste specific prohibitions-
    solvent wastes.
  (a) Effective August 8, 1988, the spent
solvent wastes specified  in §261.31  as
EPA Hazardous Waste Nos. F001, F002,
F003,  F004,  and F005 are prohibited
from underground injection unless the
solvent waste is a solvent-water  mix-
ture or solvent-containing sludge con-
taining less than 1 percent total F001-
F005  solvent  constituents  listed  in
Table A of this section.
  (b) Effective August 8, 1990, all spent
F001-F005  solvent  wastes  containing
less than 1 percent total  F001-F005 sol-
vent constituents listed in Table  A of
this section are prohibited from injec-
tion.
  (c) Effective August 8, 1990, all spent
FQ02 and F005 wastes containing sol-
vent constituents listed in Table  B of
this section are prohibited from under-
ground injection at  off-site injection
facilities.
  (d)  Effective November 8, 1990,  the
wastes specified in paragraph (c) of this
section  are  prohibited   from  under-
ground injection at  on-site injection
facilities.
  (e) The  requirements of paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section  do not apply:
  (1) If the wastes meet or are treated
to meet the applicable standards speci-
fied in subpart D of part 268; or
  (2) If an exemption from a prohibi-
tion has been granted in response to a
petition under subpart C of this part;
or
  (3) During  the  period of extension of
the applicable effective date, if an ex-
tension has  been granted under §148.4
of this part.

               TABLE A

Acetone
n-Butyl alcohol
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Cresols and cresylic acid
Cyclohexanone
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl benzene
Ethyl ether
Isolmtanol
Methanol
Methylene chloride
Methylene  chloride  (from  the  paarma-
   ceutical industry)
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Nitrobenzene
Pyridine
Tetrachloroethylene
Toulene
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
l,2,2-TricbJ.oro-l,2,2-triflnoroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Xylene

               TABLE B

Benzene
2-Ethoxyethanol
2-Nitropropane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
[53 FR 28154, July 26. 1988, as amended at 54
FR 25422, June 14,  1989; 56 FR 3876,  Jan. 31,
1991; 57 FR 8088, Mar. 6, 1992]

§148.11  Waste  specific  prohibitions—
   dioxin-containing wastes.

  (a)  Effective  August  8,  1988,  the
dioxin-containing  wastes specified in
§261.31  as EPA Hazardous Waste Nos.
F020, F021, F022,  F023, F026, FQ27,  and
F028, and prohibited from underground
injection.
  (b) The requirements of paragraph (a)
of this section do not apply:
  (1) If the wastes meet or are treated
to meet the applicable standards speci-
fied in subpart D of part 268; or
  (2) If an exemption  from a prohibi-
tion has been granted in response to a
                                      830

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §148.14
petition under subpart C of this part;
or
  (3) During the period of extension of
the applicable effective date, if  an ex-
tension has been granted under §148.4
of this part.
[53 PR 28154,  July 26,  1988, as amended at 54
PR 25422, June 14, 1989]

§148.12  Waste  specific  prohibitions-
    California list wastes.
  (a) Effective August 8,  1988, the haz-
ardous  wastes listed in 40  CPR 268.32
containing  polychlorinated biphenyls
at concentrations greater than or equal
to 50 ppm or halogenated organic com-
pounds at concentrations greater than
or equal to  10,000 nag/kg are prohibited
from underground injection.
  (b) Effective August 8,  1990, the fol-
lowing hazardous wastes are prohibited
from underground injection:
  (1) Liquid hazardous wastes, includ-
ing free liquids associated with any
solid    or   sludge,   containing  free
cyanides  at   concentrations  greater
than or equal to 1,000 mg/1;
  (2) Liquid hazardous wastes, includ-
ing free liquids associated with any
solid  or sludge, containing  the  fol-
lowing  metals (or  elements) or com-
pounds of these metals (or elements) at
concentrations greater than or equal to
those specified below:
  (i) Arsenic and/or compounds (as As)
500 mg/1;
  (ii)  Cadmium and/or compounds (as
Cd) 100 mg/1;
  (ill)   Chromium  (VI)  and/or   com-
pounds (as Cr VI) 500 mg/1;
  (iv) Lead  and/or  compounds (as Pb)
500 mg/1;
  (v)  Mercury and/or compounds (as
Hg) 20 mg/1;
  (vi) Nickel and/or compounds (as Ni)
134 mg/1;
  (vii)  Selenium and/or compounds (as
Se) 100 mg/1; and
  (viii)  Thallium and/or compounds (as
Tl) 130 mg/1;
  (3) Liquid hazardous waste  having a
pH less than or equal to two  (2.0); and
  (4) Hazardous wastes containing halo-
genated organic compounds  in  total
concentration  less  than  10,000  rag/kg
but greater  than or equal to  1,000 mg/
kg.
  (c) The requirements of  paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section  do not  apply:
  (1) If the wastes meet or are treated
to meet the applicable standards speci-
fied in subpart D of part 268; or
  (2) If an exemption from a prohibi-
tion has been granted in response to a
petition  under subpart C of this part;
or
  (3) During the period of extension of
the applicable effective date, if an ex-
tension is granted  under §148.4 of this
part.

[53 FR 30918, Aug. 16,  1988, as amended at 53
FR 41602, Oct. 24, 1988]

§148.14  Waste specific  prohibitions—
    first third wastes.
  (a) Effective June 7, 1989, the wastes
specified in 40 CPR 261.31 as EPA Haz-
ardous Waste  numbers P006 (nonwaste-
waters) and the wastes specified in 40
CFR 261.32  as EPA  Hazardous  Waste
numbers K001, K015 (wastewaters), K016
(at concentrations  greater  than  or
equal  to  1%), K018,  K019,  K020, K021
(nonwastewaters  generated  by  the
process described in  the  waste listing
description  and disposed after August
17,  1988,  and not  generated in  the
course of treating wastewater forms of
these wastes), K022 (nonwastewaters),
K024, K030, K036 (nonwastewaters gen-
erated by the process described in the
waste  listing  description and disposed
after August 17, 1988, and not generated
in the course of treating  wastewater
forms  of these  wastes),  K037,  K044,
K045,   nonexplosive  K046  (nonwaste-
waters),  K047, K048, K060  (nonwaste-
waters generated  by  the process de-
scribed in the waste listing description
and disposed after August 17, 1988, and
not generated in the course of treating
wastewater  forms  of  these wastes),
K061   (nonwastewaters),   noncalcium
sulfate   K069  (nonwastewaters   gen-
erated by the process described in the
waste listing  description and disposed
after August 17, 1988, and not generated
in the course of treating  wastewater
forms  of these  wastes),  K086 solvent
washes,  K087, K099,  K101  (all  waste-
waters and less than 1% total arsenic
nonwastewaters), K102 (all wastewaters
and less than 1%  total  arsenic non-
wastewaters),  and K103 are prohibited
from underground injection.
                                     831

-------
§148.15
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (b) Effective June 8, 1989, the waste
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous  Waste  number K036  (waste-
waters); and the wastes specified in 40
CFR 261.33  as P030,  P039,  P041,  P063,
P071,  P089,  P094, P097, U221,  and U223
are prohibited from underground injec-
tion.
  (c) Effective July 8, 1989, the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.31 as EPA Haz-
ardous Waste  numbers  F008  and F009
are prohibited from underground injec-
tion.
  (d)  Effective  August  8,  1990,  the
wastes specified in 40  CFR  261.31  as
EPA  Hazardous Waste Number F006
(wastewaters)  and  F019;  the  wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous Waste Numbers K004, K008, K015
(nonwastewaters),      K017,      K021
(wastewaters),   K022   (wastewaters),
K031,  K035,  K046 (reactive nonwaste-
waters  and  all  wastewaters),  K060
(wastewaters), K061 (wastewaters), K069
(calcium  sulfate nonwastewaters  and
all wastewaters), K073, K083, K084, K085,
K086  (all but  solvent  washes),  K101
(high  arsenic nonwastewaters),  K102
(high  arsenic  nonwastewaters),  and
K106;  and the  wastes specified in  40
CFR  part  261.33 as  EPA Hazardous
Waste  Numbers P001,  P004, P005, P010,
P011, P012, P015, P016, P018, P020, P036,
P037, P048, P050, P058, P059, P068, P069,
P070, P081, P082, P084, P087, P092, P102,
P105, P108, P110, P115, P120, P122, P123,
U007, U009, U010, U012, U016, U018, U019,
U022, U029, U031, U036, U037, U041, U043,
U044, U046, U050, U051, U053, U061, U063,
U064, U066, U067, U074, U077, U078, U086,
U089, U103, U105, U108, U115, U122, U124,
U129, U130, U133, U134, U137, U151, U154,
U155, U157, U158, U159, U171, U177, U180,
U185, U188, U192, U200, U209, U210, U211,
U219, U220, U226, U227, U228, U237, U238,
U248, and U249 are prohibited from un-
derground injection  at off-site injec-
tion facilities.
  (e)  Effective  August  8,  1990,  the
wastes specified in 40  CFR  261.32  as
EPA Hazardous  Waste  numbers K049,
K050,  K051,  K052, K062, K071,  and K104
are prohibited from underground injec-
tion.
  (f) Effective November  8,  1990, the
wastes specified in paragraph (d) of this
section are  prohibited  from  under-
ground injection at  on-site  injection
facilities.
  (g) Effective June 7, 1991, the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous  Waste numbers  K016 (at con-
centrations less  than 1%) are prohib-
ited from underground injection.
  (h) Effective  June 8, 1991,  the waste
specified in 40 CFR 261.31 as EPA Haz-
ardous  Waste  number F007; and the
wastes  specified in 40 CFR  261.32 as
K011 (nonwastewaters) and K013 (non-
wastewaters) are prohibited from un-
derground injection.
  (i) Effective May 8, 1992, the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 and 261.33 as
EPA Hazardous  Waste Numbers K011
(wastewaters), K013 (wastewaters), and
K014 are prohibited from underground
injection.
  (j) The requirements  of paragraphs
(a)  through (i) of this section do not
apply:
  (1) If the wastes meet or are treated
to meet the applicable standards speci-
fied in subpart D of part 268; or
  (2) If  an exemption from a  prohibi-
tion has been granted in response to a
petition under  subpart C of this part;
or
  (3) During the  period of extension of
the applicable effective date, if an ex-
tension  has been granted  under §148.4
of this part.
[54 FR 25423, June 14, 1989, as amended at 54
FR  26647, June 23, 1989; 54 FR 35328, Aug. 25,
1989; 55 FR 22683, June 1, 1990]

§148.15  Waste specific  prohibitions—
    second third wastes.
  (a) Effective June 7, 1989, the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous  Waste   numbers  K025  (non-
wastewaters  generated by the process
described in  the  waste listing descrip-
tion and disposed after August 17, 1988,
and not generated  in the  course of
treating- wastewater  forms  of  these
wastes)   are  prohibited  from  under-
ground injection.
  (b) Effective June 8, 1989, the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.31 as EPA Haz-
ardous Waste numbers F010, F024; the
wastes  specified in 40 CFR  261.32 as
K009  (nonwastewaters),   K010,  K027,
K028,  K029  (nonwastewaters),  K038,
K039, K040,  K043,   K095  (nonwaste-
waters),  K096 (nonwastewaters), K113,
K114, K115, K116; and wastes specified
in 40 CFR 261.33 as P029, P040,  P043,
P044, P062, P074,  P085, P098, P104, P106,
                                     832

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §148.16
PHI, U028, U058, U107, and U235 are pro-
hibited from underground injection.
  (c)  Effective  July 8,  1989, and con-
tinuing  until  December 8,  1989,  the
wastes  specified  in  40  CFB 261.31  as
EPA  Hazardous Waste   numbers F011
and F012 are  prohibited from under-
ground injection pursuant to the treat-
ment standards specified in §§ 268.41 and
268.43 applicable to F007, F008, and F009
wastewaters and nonwastewaters.  Ef-
fective  December 8,  1989, F011 (non-
wastewaters)  and   F012  (nonwaste-
waters) are prohibited pursuant to the
treatment   standards   specified   in
§§268.41 and 268.43  applicable  to F011
and F012 wastewaters  and  nonwaste-
waters.
  (d)  Effective  August 8,  1990,  the
wastes  specified  in  40  CFR 261.32  as
EPA  Hazardous  Waste  Number K025
(wastewaters),   K029    (wastewaters),
K041, K042,  K095 (wastewaters), K096
(wastewaters),  K097,  K098,  and K105;
and the wastes specified in 40 CFB part
261.33 as  P002,  POOS, P007, POOS, P014,
P026, P027, P049, P054, P057, P060, P066,
P067, P072, P107, P112, P113, P114, U002,
U003, U005, U008, U011, U014, U015, U020,
U021, U023, 17025, U026, U032, U035, U047,
U049, U057, U059, U060, U062, U070, U073,
U080, U083, U092, U093, U094, U095, U097,
U098, U099, U101, U106, U109, U110, Ulll,
U114, U116, U119, U127, U128, U131, U135,
U138, U140, U142, U143, U144, U146, U147,
U149, U150, U161, U162, U163, U164, U165,
U168, U169, 0170, U172, U173, U174, U176,
U178, U179, U189, U193, U196, U203, U205,
U206, U208, U213, U214, U215, U216, U217,
U218, U239,  and  U244  are  prohibited
from  underground injection at off-site
injection facilities.
  (e) Effective June  8, 1991,  the  waste
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as  EPA Haz-
ardous  Waste  number  K009  (waste-
waters) is prohibited from underground
injection.
  (f) Effective November 8,  1990, the
wastes specified in paragraph (d) of this
section are prohibited  from  under-
ground  injection  at on-site  injection
facilities.
  (g)  The requirements  of paragraphs
(a)  through  (f)  of this section do not
apply:
  (1) If the wastes meet or are treated
to meet the applicable standards speci-
fied in subpart D of part  268; or
  (2) If an  exemption  from a prohibi-
tion has been granted  in response to a
petition under subpart C of this part;
or
  (3) During the period of extension of
the applicable effective date, if an ex-
tension has been granted under §148.4
of this part.
[54 FB 25423, June 14, 1989, as amended at 54
FB 26647, June 23,  1989; 55 FR 22683, June 1,
1990]

§148.16  Waste  specific  prohibitions—
    third third wastes.
  (a) Effective June 7,  1989,  the  wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous Waste numbers  K100  (nonwaste-
waters  generated  by  the process  de-
scribed in the waste listing description
and disposed after August 17, 1988, and
not generated in the course  of treating
wastewater forms of these wastes)  are
prohibited from underground injection.
  (b) Effective June 8,  1989,  the  wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous Waste numbers  K005  (nonwaste-
waters), K007 (nonwastewaters), K023,
K093, K094;  and the wastes specified in
40 CFR 261.33 as  P013,. P021,  P099, P109,
P121,  U069,  U087,  U088,  U102, and U190
are prohibited from underground injec-
tion.
  (c)  Effective   August 8,   1990,  the
wastes  identified in 40 CFR 261.31  as
EPA  Hazardous Waste  Number F039
(nonwastewaters); the  wastes specified
in 40  CFR 261.32  as  EPA  Hazardous
Waste Numbers K002, K003, K005 (waste-
waters), K006, K007 (wastewaters), K026,
K032,   K033,  K034,  and  K100  (waste-
waters); the wastes specified in 40 CFR
261.33 as P006, P009, P017, P022, P023,
P024, P028, P031,  P033, P034,  P038, P042,
P045, P046, P047,  P051, P056,  P064, P065,
P073, P075, P076,  P077, P078,  P088, P093,
P095, P096, P101,  P103, P116,  P118, P119,
U001, U004, U006,  U017, U024,  U027, U030,
U033, U034, U038,  U039, U042,  U045, U048,
U052, U055, U056,  U068, U071,  U072, U075,
U076, U079, U081,  U082, U084,  U085, U090,
U091, U096, U112,  U113, U117,  U118, U120,
U121, U123, U125,  U126, U132,  U136, U141,
U145, U148, U152,  U153, U156,  U160, U166,
U167, U181, U182,  U183, U184,  U186, U187,
U191, U194, U197,  U201, U202,  U204, U207,
U222, U225, U234,  U236, U240,  U243, U246,
and U247; and the  wastes identified in
40 CFR 261.21, 261.23 or 261.24 as haz-
ardous based on a characteristic alone,
                                     833

-------
§148.17
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
designated as  D001,  D004,  D005,  D006,
D008, D009  (wastewaters),  D010,  D011,
D012, D013, D014, D015, D016, D017, and
newly listed waste F025 are prohibited
from underground injection at off-site
injection facilities.
  (d) Effective August 8, 1990, mixed ra-
dioactive/hazardous  waste  in  40 CPR
268.10, 268.11, and 268.12, that are mixed
radioactive  and hazardous  wastes,  are
prohibited from underground injection.
  (e) Effective November 8, 1990,  the
wastes specified in paragraph (c) of this
section are  prohibited  from under-
ground  injection  at on-site injection
facilities. These effective dates do  not
apply to the wastes listed in 40 CFR
148.12(b) which are prohibited from  un-
derground injection on August  8,1990.
  (f) Effective  May  8,  1992, the waste
identified in 40 CFR 261.31 as EPA Haz-
ardous  Waste   Number  F039   (waste-
waters); the wastes identified in 40 CFR
261.22,  261.23 or 261.24 as  hazardous
based on  a  characteristic  alone,  des-
ignated as D002 (wastewaters and non-
wastewaters),  D003  (wastewaters  and
non waste waters),  D007  (wastewaters
and  non wastewaters),  and  D009  (non-
wastewaters) are prohibited from  un-
derground  injection.  These effective
dates do not apply to the wastes listed
in 40 CFR 148.12(b) which are prohibited
from underground injection on August
8, 1990.
  (g) The requirements of  paragraphs
(a) through  (f) of this section do  not
apply:
  (1) If  the wastes meet or  are treated
to meet the applicable standards speci-
fied in subpart D of part 268; or
  (2) If an exemption from a  prohibi-
tion has been granted in response to a
petition under subpart C of this part;
or
  (3) During  the period of extension of
the applicable  effective date, if an  ex-
tension has  been granted under §148.4
of this part.
[54 PR 25423, June 14, 1989, as amended at 54
PR 26647, June 23, 1989; 55 PR 22683, June 1,
1990;  55 PR 33694, Aug.  17, 1990; 56 FR 3876,
Jan. 31, 1991]

§148.17 Waste  specific  prohibitions;
   newly listed wastes.
  (a) Effective November  9,  1992,  the
wastes  specified in 40 CFR part 261 as
EPA hazardous waste numbers  F037,
F038, K107, K108, K109, K110, Kill, K112,
K117, K118, K123, K124, K125, K126, K131,
K136, U328, U353, and U359 are  prohib-
ited from underground injection.
  (b) Effective December  19, 1994 the
wastes  specified in  40 CFR 261.32 as
EPA Hazardous waste numbers  K141,
K142, K143, K144, K145, K147, K148, K149,
K150, and K151, are prohibited from un-
derground injection.
  (c) [Reserved]
  (d) Effective June 30, 1995, the wastes
specified in 40 CFR  part  261  as EPA
Hazardous  waste numbers K117,  K118,
K131, and K132 are  prohibited from un-
derground injection.
  (e) The requirements  of paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section do not apply:
  (1) If the wastes  meet or are treated
to meet the applicable standards speci-
fied in subpart D of part 268; or
  (2) If  an exemption from  a  prohibi-
tion has been granted in response to a
petition under subpart C  of this part;
or
  (3) During the period of  extension of
the applicable effective date, if  an ex-
tension  has been granted  under §148.4
of this part.

[57 FR 37263, Aug. 18,  1992, as  amended at 59
FR 48041, Sept.  19, 1994; 61 FR 15662, Apr. 8,
1996]
                         irohibitions—
                             wastes.
§148.18 Waste specific prohibit!
    newly listed and identified was
  (a)  Effective August  24,  1998,  all
newly identified D004-D011 wastes and
characteristic   mineral   processing
wastes, except  those identified in para-
graph (b) of this section, are prohibited
from underground injection.
  (b)  Effective May  26, 2000,  char-
acteristic hazardous wastes from tita-
nium dioxide mineral processing,  and
radioactive wastes mixed with  newly
identified  D004-D011  or  mixed  with
newly identified characteristic mineral
processing wastes, are prohibited from
underground injection.
  (c)  Effective August  11,  1997,  the
wastes specified in 40 CFR part 261 as
EPA  Hazardous waste numbers F032,
F034,  F035 are prohibited from under-
ground injection.
  (d) Effective  May 12, 1999, the wastes
specified in  40 CFR  part 261  as EPA
Hazardous waste  numbers F032, F034,
F035  that  are  mixed with radioactive
                                     834

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §148.20
wastes  are  prohibited  from  under-
ground injection.
  (e) On July 8, 1996, the wastes speci-
fied in 40 CFR 261.32 as EPA Hazardous
waste  numbers K156-K161,  P127,  P128,
P185,  P188-P192, P194, P196-P199,  P201-
P205,  U271, U277-U280, U364-U367,  U372,
TJ373,  U375-U379,  U381-387,  U389-U396,
U400-U404, U407, and U409-U411 are pro-
hibited from underground injection.
  (f) On January 8, 1997,  the wastes
specified in 40  CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous waste number K088 is prohibited
from underground injection.
  (gO On April 8, 1998, the wastes speci-
fied in  40 CFR part 261  as EPA Haz-
ardous  waste  numbers D018-043, and
Mixed TC/Radioactive wastes,  are pro-
hibited from underground injection.
  (h) [Reserved]
  (i) Effective February 8, 1999, the
wastes  specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as
EPA Hazardous Waste Numbers  K169,
K170,  K171,  and K172  are  prohibited
from underground injection.
  (j) Effective May 8, 2001, the wastes
specified in 40  CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous Waste Numbers K174 and K175
are prohibited from underground injec-
tion.
  (k) Effective  May 20, 2002, the wastes
specified in 40 CFR 261.32 as EPA Haz-
ardous Waste Numbers K176, K177, and
K178 are prohibited from underground
injection.
  (1) The  requirements  of  paragraphs
(a)  through (k) of this section do not
apply:
  (1) If the wastes meet or  are treated
to meet the applicable standards speci-
fied in subpart D of 40 CFR part 268; or
  (2) If an exemption from a  prohibi-
tion has been granted in response to a
petition under subpart C of this  part;
or
  (3) During  the period of extension of
the applicable  effective date, if an ex-
tension has been granted under §148.4.

[61 FR 15662,  Apr. 8, 1996, as amended at 62
FR  26018, May 12, 1997; 63 PR  24624, May 4,
1998; 63 FR 28636, May 26,  1998; 63 FR 35149,
June 29, 1998; 63 FR 42184, Aug.  6, 1998; 65 FR
14474, Mar. 17,  2000; 65 FR 36366, June 8, 2000;
65 FR 67126, Nov.  8, 2000; 66 FR 58297, Nov. 20,
2001]
Subpart C—Petition Standards and
             Procedures

§ 148.20 Petitions to allow injection of
    a waste prohibited under subpart
    B.
  (a) Any person seeking  an  exemption
from a prohibition under  subpart B of
this part  for  the injection of a  re-
stricted hazardous waste  into an injec-
tion well  or wells shall submit a peti-
tion to  the  Director demonstrating
that, to a reasonable degree  of  cer-
tainty, there  will be no  migration of
hazardous  constituents from the injec-
tion zone for  as long as  the waste re-
mains  hazardous. This demonstration
requires a showing that:
  (1)  The  hydrogeological  and  geo-
chemical  conditions at the sites  and
the physiochemical nature of the waste
stream(s) are  such  that  reliable  pre-
dictions can be made that:
  (i) Fluid movement conditions   are
such that  the injected fluids will not
migrate within 10,000 years:
  (A) Vertically upward out of the in-
jection zone; or
  (B) Laterally  within  the  injection
zone to a  point of discharge or inter-
face with  an Underground  Source  of
Drinking Water (USDW)  as  defined in
40 CFR part 146; or
  (ii) Before the injected fluids migrate
out of the  injection zone  or  to a point
of discharge or interface  with  USDW,
the fluid  will no longer  be  hazardous
because  of attenuation,  transforma-
tion,  or immobilization  of  hazardous
constituents within the injection zone
by hydrolysis, chemical interactions or
other means; and
  (2) For each well the petition has:
  (i) Demonstrated  that  the injection
well's area of  review complies with the
substantive requirements  of §146.63;
  (ii) Located,  identified,  and  ascer-
tained the  condition of all wells within
the injection  well's  area  of  review (as
specified in §146.63)  that penetrate the
injection zone or the confining zone by
use of  a protocol acceptable  to the  Di-
rector  that meets the substantive  re-
quirements of § 146.64;
  (iii)  Submitted a  corrective action
plan that  meets the substantive  re-
quirements of §146.64, the implementa-
tion of which  shall become a condition
of petition approval; and
                                     835

-------
§148.21
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (iv) Submitted the results of pressure
and radioactive tracer tests performed
within one year prior to submission of
the  petition  demonstrating  the me-
chanical integrity of the  well's long
string casing,  injection tube, annular
seal, and bottom hole cement. In cases
where the petition has not  been ap-
proved or denied within one year after
the initial demonstration of mechan-
ical  integrity, the  Director  may re-
quire the owner or operator to perform
the tests again and submit the results
of the new tests.
  NOTE:  The requirements of § 148.20(a)(2)
need not be incorporated in a permit at the
time of petition approval.
  (b)    A    demonstration     under
§148.20(a)(l)(i) shall identify the  strata
within the  injection zone  which will
confine fluid movement above the in-
jection interval and include a showing
that  this  strata   is  free  of known
transmissive  faults of  fractures and
that there is a confining zone above the
injection zone.
  (c)    A    demonstration     under
§148.20(a)(l)(ii) shall identify the  strata
within the injection zone where  waste
transformation will  be accomplished
and include a showing that this  strata
is free of known transmissive faults or
fractures and that there is a confining
zone above the injection zone.
  (d)  A demonstration  may include  a
showing that:
  (1)  Treatment methods,  the  imple-
mentation of  which shall become  a
condition of petition approval, will be
utilized that reduce the toxicity or mo-
bility of the wastes; or
  (2) A monitoring- plan, the implemen-
tation of which shall become a  condi-
tion of petition approval,  will be uti-
lized  to enhance confidence in one or
more aspects of the demonstration.
  (e) Any person who has been granted
an exemption pursuant to this section
may submit a petition for reissuance of
the exemption to include an additional
restricted waste or wastes or to modify
any  conditions placed  on the exemp-
tion  by the  Director.  The  Director
shall reissue the petition if  the peti-
tioner complies with the requirements
of paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of this sec-
tion.
  (f) Any person who has been granted
an exemption pursuant to this section
may submit a petition to modify an ex-
emption to include an additional (haz-
ardous) waste or wastes. The Director
may grant the modification if he deter-
mines, to a reasonable degree  of cer-
tainty,  that the additional waste  or
wastes  will behave  hydraulically and
chemically in a manner similar to pre-
viously included wastes and that it will
not interfere with the containment ca-
pability of the injection zone.

§148.21  Information to  be submitted
   in support of petitions.
  (a) Information submitted in support
of §148.20  must meet the following cri-
teria:
  (1) All waste analysis and any new
testing  performed  by  the petitioner
shall be accurate and reproducible and
performed in accordance with quality
assurance standards;
  (2) Estimation techniques shall be ap-
propriate, and  BPA-certified test pro-
tocols  shall  be used  where available
and appropriate;
  (3) Predictive models shall have been
verified and validated, shall be appro-
priate   for  the  specific   site,  waste
streams,  and injection  conditions  of
the operation,  and shall be calibrated
for existing sites where sufficient data
are available;
  (4) An  approved  quality assurance
and quality control  plan shall address
all aspects of the demonstration;
  (5) Reasonably  conservative  values
shall  be used whenever values taken
from the literature or estimated on the
basis of known information are used in-
stead of  site-specific measurements;
and
  (6) An analysis shall be performed to
identify and assess aspects of the dem-
onstration  that  contribute  signifi-
cantly to uncertainty. The petitioner
shall conduct a sensitivity analysis  to
determine the  effect  that significant
uncertainty  may  contribute  to the
demonstration.   The  demonstration
shall then be based on conservative as-
sumptions identified in the analysis.
  (b)     Any    petitioner     under
§148.20(a)(l)(i) shall  provide  sufficient
site-specific information to support the
demonstration, such as:
  (1) Thickness, porosity, permeability
and extent of the various strata in the
injection zone;
                                    836

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                              §148.24
  (2) Thickness, porosity, permeability,
extent, and continuity of the confining
zone;
  (3) Hydraulic gradient in the injec-
tion zone;
  (4) Hydrostatic pressure in the injec-
tion zone; and
  (5)  Geochemical  conditions  of  the
site.
  (c) In addition to the  information in
§148.21(b),    any    petitioner   under
§ 148.20(a)(l)(ii) shall provide sufficient
waste-specific  information  to ensure
reasonably  reliant predictions about
the  waste  transformation.  The  peti-
tioner shall provide  the information
necessary  to support the demonstra-
tion, such as:
  (1) Description of the  chemical proc-
esses or other means that will lead to
waste transformation; and
  (2) Results of laboratory experiments
verifying the waste transformation.

§ 148.22 Requirements for petition sub-
    mission, review and approval or de-
    nial.
  (a) Any petition submitted to the Di-
rector pursuant to §148.20(a) shall in-
clude the following components:
  (1) An identification  of the  specific
waste or wastes and the specific injec-
tion well  or wells for which the dem-
onstration will be made;
  (2) A waste analysis to describe fully
the chemical and  physical characteris-
tics of the subject wastes;
  (3) Such  additional information as is
required by the Director to support the
petition under §§148.20 and 148.21; and
  (4) This statement signed by the peti-
tioner or an authorized  representative:
 I certify under penalty of law that I have
personally examined and am familiar with
the  information submitted In this petition
and all attached documents, and that, based
on my inquiry of those individuals imme-
diately responsible for obtaining the infor-
mation, I believe that submitted information
is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware
that there are significant penalties for sub-
mitting false information, including the pos-
sibility of fine and imprisonment.
  (b) The Director shall provide public
notice and an opportunity  for public
comment in accordance with the proce-
dures in §124.10 of the intent to approve
or deny a  petition. The final decision
on  a petition will be published in  the
FEDERAL REGISTER.
  (c) If an exemption is granted it will
apply  only to the underground injec-
tion of the specific restricted waste or
wastes identified in the petition into a
Class I hazardous waste injection well
or wells specifically identified  in  the
petition (unless the exemption is modi-
fied  or reissued pursuant to §148.20(e)
or (f).
  (d) Upon request  by  any petitioner
who obtains an exemption  for  a well
under  this subpart,  the Director shall
initiate  and  reasonably expedite  the
necessary  procedures to issue  or re-
issue a permit or permits for the haz-
ardous waste  well or wells covered by
the exemption for a term not to exceed
ten years.

§ 148.23  Review of exemptions granted
   pursuant to  a petition.
  (a) When considering  whether to re-
issue a permit  for the  operation of  a
Class I hazardous waste injection well,
the Director shall review any petition
filed pursuant to  §148.20 and require  a
new   demonstration  if  information
shows  that the  basis for granting  the
exemption may  no longer be valid.
  (b) Whenever the Director determines
that the basis for approval of a petition
may no  longer  be valid, the Director
shall require  a  new  demonstration in
accordance with § 148.20.

§ 148.24  Termination of approved peti-
   tion.
  (a) The Director may terminate an
exemption granted under §148.20 for the
following causes:
  (1) Noncompliance by the petitioner
with any condition of the exemption;
  (2) The petitioner's failure in the pe-
tition  or  during  the review  and  ap-
proval  to  disclose  fully all relevant
facts,  or the  petitioner's misrepresen-
tation  of  any  relevant facts  at any
time; or
  (3) A determination that new infor-
mation  shows  that   the   basis  for
approval  of the petition is no  longer
valid.
  (b) The Director shall terminate an
exemption granted under §148.20 for the
following causes:
  (1)  The  petitioner's  willful  with-
holding during the review and approval
                                     837

-------
Pt. 149
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
of the petition of facts directly and ma-
terially relevant to the Director's deci-
sion on the petition;
  (2)  A determination that there has
been migration from the injection zone
or the well that is not in accordance
with  the  terms of the  exemption,  ex-
cept that the Director may at  his dis-
cretion decide not to terminate where:
  (i) The migration resulted from a me-
chanical failure of the well that can be
corrected promptly through a repair to
the injection well itself or from an un-
detected well or conduit that  can  be
plugged promptly; and
  (ii) The requirements of § 146.67(1) are
satisfied.
  (c) The Director shall follow the pro-
cedures in § 124.5 in terminating any ex-
emption under this section.

PART 149-SOLE SOURCE AQUIFERS

 Subpart A—Criteria for Identifying Critical
        Aquifer Protection Areas

Sec.
149.1  Purpose.
149.2  Definitions.
149.3  Critical Aquifer Protection Areas.

Subpart B—Review of Projects Affecting
   the Edwards Underground Reservoir, A
   Designated Sole Source Aquifer in the
   San Antonio, Texas Area

149.100  Applicability.
149.101  Definitions.
149.102  Project review authority.
149.103  Public information.
149.104  Submission of petitions.
149.105  Decision to review.
149.106  Notice of review.
149.107  Request for information.
149.108  Public hearing.
149.109  Decision under section 1424(e).
149.110  Resubmittal of redesigned projects.
149.111  Funding to redesigned projects.
  AUTHORITY:  Sec. I424(e), Safe  Drinking
Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300h-3(e); sec. 1427 of the
Safe  Drinking Water Act, (42 U.S.C. 300h-6).

 Subpart A—Criteria for Identifying
  Critical Aquifer Protection Areas

  SOURCE: 52 FR 23986,  June 26, 1987, unless
otherwise noted.

§ 149.1 Purpose.
  The purpose of this subpart is to pro-
vide criteria for identifying critical aq-
uifer protection areas, pursuant to sec-
tion 1427 of the Safe Drinking Water
Act (SDWA).

§ 149.2 Definitions.
  (a) Aquifer means a geological forma-
tion, group of formations, or part of a
formation that is capable of yielding- a
significant amount  of water  to a well
or spring.
  (b) Recharge means a process, natural
or artificial, by which water is added to
the saturated zone of an aquifer.
  (c) Recharge Area  means an  area  in
which water reaches the zone  of satura-
tion (ground water)  by surface infiltra-
tion; in addition, a  major recharge area
is an area where a major part of the re-
charge to an aquifer occurs.
  (d)  Sole  or Principal Source Aquifer
(SSA) means an aquifer  which is des-
ignated as an SSA under section 1424(e)
of the SDWA.
[54 FR 6843, Feb. 14, 1989]

§149.3 Critical    Aquifer  Protection
   Areas.
  A Critical Aquifer Protection Area is
either:
  (a) All or part of  an area which was
designated as a sole  or principal source
aquifer prior to  June 19, 1986,  and for
which an areawide ground-water  qual-
ity  protection   plan  was   approved,
under section 208 of the Clean Water
Act, prior to that date; or
  (b) All  or  part of a major recharge
area of a sole or principal source aqui-
fer, designated before June 19, 1988, for
which:
  (1) The sole or principal source aqui-
fer is particularly vulnerable  to con-
tamination due  to  the hydrogeologic
characteristics of the  unsaturated  or
saturated  zone  within  the  suggested
critical aquifer protection area; and
  (2) Contamination of the sole or prin-
cipal  source aquifer  is  reasonably
likely to occur, unless a program  to re-
duce or prevent such contamination is
implemented; and
  (3) In the absence of any program to
reduce or prevent contamination, rea-
sonably   foreseeable  contamination
would result in significant cost, taking
into account:
  (i) The cost of replacing the drinking
water supply from the sole or principal
source aquifer, and
                                     838

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            §149.101
  (ii) Other economic costs  and envi-
ronmental and  social costs resulting
from such contamination.
[54 FR 6843, Feb. 14, 1989]

Subpart B—Review of Projects Af-
     fecting  the  Edwards Under-
     ground   Reservoir,    A   Des-
     ignated Sole Source Aquifer in
     tne San Antonio, Texas Area

  SOURCE: 42 FR 51574, Sept. 29,  1977, unless
otherwise noted. Redesignated at 52 FR 23986,
June 26,1987.

§149.100 Applicability.
  This subpart sets forth,  pursuant  to
sections 1424(e) and 1450 of the  Public
Health Service Act, as amended by the
Safe Drinking Water Act,  Pub. L. 93-
523,  regulations relating the Edwards
Underground Reservoir  which  is the
sole or principal drinking water source
for the San Antonio area and which, if
contaminated, would create a  signifi-
cant hazard to public health.
[42 FR 51574, Sept. 29, 1977. Redesignated and
amended at 52 FR 23986, June 26, 1987]

§149.101 Definitions.
  As used in this subpart and except  as
otherwise specifically  provided, the
term(s):
  (a) Act means the Public Health Serv-
ice Act, as amended by the  Safe  Drink-
ing: Water Act, Public Law 93^523.
  (b) Contaminant means any physical,
chemical, biological,  or  radiological
substance or matter in water.
  (c)  Recharge zone  means  the area
through which water enters the Ed-
wards  Underground Reservoir   as de-
fined in the December 16,  1975,  Notice
of Determination.
  (d) Administrator  (Regional Adminis-
trator) means the  Administrator (Re-
gional Administrator) of  the  United
States   Environmental   Protection
Agency.
  (e) Person  means an individual, cor-
poration, company, association, part-
nership, State, or municipality.
  (f) Project means a program or action
or which an application for Federal fi-
nancial assistance has been  made.
  (g) Federal financial assistance  means
my financial benefits provided directly
is aid to  a  project by a department,
agency, or instrumentality of the Fed-
eral government in any form including
contracts, grants, and loan guarantees.
Actions or programs carried out by the
Federal  government  itself  such  as
dredging- performed by the Army Corps
of Engineers do not involve Federal fi-
nancial assistance. Actions performed
for the Federal government by contrac-
tors, such  as construction of roads on
Federal lands  by  a  contractor  under
the supervision of the Bureau of Land
Management,  should be distinguished
from contracts entered  into  specifi-
cally for the  purpose of providing fi-
nancial assistance, and will not be con-
sidered  programs or  actions receiving
Federal financial  assistance. Federal
financial assistance is limited to bene-
fits  earmarked for a specific program
or action and directly awarded  to  the
program or action. Indirect  assistance,
e.g., in  the form of a loan to a devel-
oper by a lending institution which in
turn receives  Federal  assistance  not
specifically related to  the  project in
question is not Federal financial assist-
ance under section 1424(e).
  (h) Commitment of Federal financial as-
sistance means a written agreement en-
tered into by a department, agency, or
instrumentality of the Federal Govern-
ment to provide financial assistance as
defined in paragraph (g) of this section.
Renewal of a commitment  which  the
issuing  agency determines  has  lapsed
shall not constitute a new commitment
unless the  Regional Administrator de-
termines that the  project's impact on
the aquifer has not been previously re-
viewed under section 1424(e). The deter-
mination of a  Federal  agency that a
certain  written agreement constitutes
a commitment shall be conclusive with
respect to the existence of such a com-
mitment.
  (i) Streamflow source zone  means  the
upstream headwaters area which drains
into the recharge zone as defined in the
December  16, 1975,  Notice  of  Deter-
mination.
  (j) Significant hazard to public health
means any level of contaminant which
causes or may cause the aquifer to ex-
ceed any maximum contaminant level
set forth in any promulgated National
Primary Drinking Water Standard  at
any point where the water may be used
for drinking purposes or which may
                                    839

-------
§149.102
          40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
otherwise adversely affect the health of
persons, or which may require a public
water  system to  install  additional
treatment to prevent such adverse ef-
fect.
  (k) Aquifer means the Edwards Under-
ground Reservoir.

[42 PR 51574, Sept. 29, 1977. Redesignated and
amended at 52 FR 23986, June 26, 1987]

§ 149.102   Project review authority.
  (a) Once an  area  is  designated, no
subsequent commitments of Federal fi-
nancial assistance may  be made to
projects which the Administrator de-
termines may contaminate the aquifer
so as to create a significant hazard to
public health.
  (b) The  Regional  Administrator is
hereby delegated the authority and as-
signed responsibility  for  carrying  out
the project review process assigned to
the Administrator under section 1424(e)
of the Act, except the final determina-
tion that a project  may  contaminate
the aquifer through its recharge  zone
so as to create a significant hazard to
public health.
  (c) The  Regional Administrator  may
review any project which he considers
may potentially contaminate the aqui-
fer through its recharge zone so as to
create  a  significant hazard  to public
health.

§ 149.103   Public information.
  After the area is designated under
section 1424(e), Federal agencies, for
projects, located  in the recharge  zone
and streamflow source zones, are re-
quired to:
  (a) Maintain a  list of projects for
which  environmental  impact  state-
ments  will be  prepared in accordance
with the National Environmental Pol-
icy Act (NEPA);
  (b) Revise  the list  at regular inter-
vals and submit to EPA; and
  (c) Make the list  available to  the
public upon request.

§ 149.104   Submission of petitions.
  Any person may submit a petition re-
questing  the  Regional Administrator
to review  a project to determine if such
project may contaminate the aquifer
through  its  recharge zone  so as to
create a  significant hazard to public
health.  Any  such petition shall iden-
tify:
  (a) The name, address, and telephone
number of the individual, organization,
or other entity  submitting  the peti-
tion;
  (b) A brief  statement of the request-
ing person's  interest in the Regional
Administrator's determination;
  (c) The name of the project and Fed-
eral agency involved;
In addition, the petitioner is requested
to submit  to EPA available informa-
tion on:
  (d) Applicable  action already taken
by State and local agencies including
establishment of regulations to prevent
contamination of the aquifer and why,
in the petitioner's judgment,  the  ac-
tion was inadequate.
  (e) Any actions taken under  the Na-
tional  Environmental  Policy Act and
why, in the petitioner's judgment, that
action was  inadequate in  regard  to
evaluation of potential effect on the
aquifer.
  (f) The potential  contaminants  in-
volved;
  (g) The means by which the contami-
nant might enter the aquifer; and
  (h) The potential impact of the pro-
posed project.

§ 149.105 Decision to review.
  (a) The Regional Administrator shall
review under section 1424(e) all projects
located in  the recharge or streamflow
source zone of the aquifer for which a
draft  or final EIS is submitted which
may have  an impact on ground water
quality and  which involve Federal  fi-
nancial assistance as defined in these
regulations.
  (b) Upon receipt of a  public petition,
the Regional Administrator shall  de-
cide whether the project which is the
subject of the petition should be re-
viewed under section 1424(e).
  (c) The Regional Administrator may
decide to review a project upon his own
motion.
  (d) In determining whether to review
a project upon receipt of a public peti-
tion or upon his own motion,  the Re-
gional  Administrator  shall  consider
whether the  project is likely to di-
rectly or indirectly cause contamina-
tion of the aquifer through its recharge
                                     840

-------
Environmental Protection Agency
                            § 149.109
zone, taking into account any factors
he deems relevant, including:
  (1) The location of the project, and
  (2) The nature of the project.
  (e) In determining' whether to review
a project upon receipt of a public peti-
tion or upon his own motion,  the  Re-
gional  Administrator   may  consult
with, or request information from,  the
Federal  agency to which the project
application has been made, the  appli-
cant seeking Federal assistance, appro-
priate State and local  agencies,  and
other appropriate persons or entities.
  (f) In determining whether to review
a project which is the subject of a pub-
lic  petition,  the  Regional  Adminis-
trator may request such additional in-
formation  from  the  petitioner  as he
deems necessary.

§ 149.106 Notice of review.
  (a) Notice to Federal agency. If the  Re-
gional Administrator decides upon re-
ceipt of a  public petition or upon  his
own motion to review a project  under
section 1424(e),  he shall give  written
notification of the decision to the Fed-
eral agency from which financial  as-
sistance is sought.  The  notification
shall include a description and identi-
fication of the project.
  (b)  Notice to public. When the  Re-
gional Administrator undertakes to re-
view  a  project  pursuant  to  §149.13
above, he shall provide public notice of
project review by  such means  as he
deems appropriate. The notice shall set
forth the availability for public review
of all  data and information  available,
and shall solicit comments, data  and
information with respect to the deter-
mination  of  impact under  section
1424(e). The period for public comment
shall be 30 days after public notice  un-
less the Regional  Administrator  ex-
tends the period  at his discretion or a
rablic hearing is held under § 149.16.

 149.107 Request for information.
  In reviewing a  project  under section
 424(e), the  Regional  Administrator
may request any additional informa-
;ion from the funding Federal agency
vhich  is pertinent  to reaching a deci-
sion. If full evaluation of the grround-
vater impact of a project has not been
submitted in accordance with the agen-
cy's NEPA procedures,  the Regional
Administrator may specifically request
that  the  Federal agency  submit  a
groundwater  impact  evaluation  of
whether the proposed project may con-
taminate the aquifer through  its re-
charge zone so as to create a signifi-
cant hazard to public health.

§ 149.108  Public hearing.
  If there is significant public interest,
the Regional Administrator may hold a
public hearing  with  respect  to any
project or projects to be reviewed if he
finds that such a hearing is necessary
and would be  helpful in clarifying the
issues. Public hearings held under this
section should be coordinated,  if pos-
sible, with other  Federal public hear-
ings held pursuant to applicable laws
and regulations.  Any  such hearing
shall be conducted by the Regional Ad-
ministrator or designee in an informal,
orderly and expeditious manner. Where
appropriate, limits may be placed upon
the time allowed for oral statements,
and statements may be required to be
submitted in  writing. The  record will
be held  open  for further public com-
ment for seven (7) days following the
close of the public hearing.

§ 149.109  Decision   under   section
    1424(e).
  (a) As  soon  as  practicable after the
submission of public  comments  under
section  1424(e)  and  information  re-
quested by the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency from the originating Fed-
eral agency, on the basis of such infor-
mation as is available to him, the Re-
gional Administrator shall  review the
project taking all relevant factors into
account including:
  (1)  The  extent of  possible  public
health hazard  presented by the project;
  (2)  Planning,  design, construction,
operation, maintenance  and  moni-
toring measures included in the project
which  would prevent or  mitigate the
possible health hazard;
  (3) The extent  and  effectiveness  of
State  or local control  over possible
contaminant releases to the aquifer;
  (4) The cumulative and secondary im-
pacts of the proposed project; and
  (5) The expected environmental bene-
fits of the proposed project.
                                    841

-------
§149.110
         40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-04 Edition)
  (b) After reviewing the available in-
formation, the Regional Administrator
shall:
  (1) Determine that the risk of  con-
tamination of the aquifer through the
recharge zone so as to create a signifi-
cant hazard to public health is not suf-
ficiently great so as to prevent com-
mitment  of  Federal  funding to the
project; or
  (2) Forward the information to the
Administrator  with his recommenda-
tion that the project may contaminate
the aquifer through the  recharge  zone
so as to create a significant hazard  to
public health.
  (c) After receiving the  available in-
formation  forwarded by the Regional
Administrator,    the   Administrator
shall:
  (1) Determine that the risk of  con-
tamination of the aquifer through the
recharge zone so as to create a signifi-
cant hazard to public health is not suf-
ficiently great so as to prevent com-
mitment  of  Federal  funding to the
project; or
  (2) Determine that the project  may
contaminate  the aquifer through the
recharge zone so as to create a signifi-
cant hazard to public health.
  (d) Notice of any decisions by the Re-
gional  Administrator under paragraph
(b)(l) of this section or by the Adminis-
trator under paragraphs (c)(l) and (2) of
this section to prevent a commitment
of Federal funding shall be published in
the FEDERAL REGISTER. Such notices
shall include  a  description  of the
propsed project, and a statement of de-
cision  with  an accompanying: state-
ment of facts and reasons.

§149.110 Resubmittal  of redesigned
    projects.
  If a project is redesigned in response
to BPA's objections,  the applicant for
Federal  financial  assistance  or the
grantor agency may file a petition with
the Regional Administrator for  with-
drawal  of the determination that the
project  may contaminate  the  aquifer
through the recharge zone so as to cre-
ate  a  significant  hazard  to  public
health.  Any such petition  shall dem-
onstrate how the project has been rede-
signed so as to justify the withdrawal
of EPA's objections. If appropriate, the
Regional Administrator may  request
public comments or hold an informal
public hearing to consider the petition.
After review of pertinent information,
the Regional  Administrator shall  ei-
ther deny the  petition  or recommend
to the  Administrator that  the initial
determination that a project may con-
taminate the aquifer be vacated. Upon
receipt  of a recommendation from the
Regional Administrator that a deter-
mination  be  vacated,  the Adminis-
trator shall either deny the petition or
order that the initial determination be
vacated. The final decision regarding a
petition shall be published in the FED-
ERAL  REGISTER with an accompanying
statement of reasons.
§ 149.111
    ects.
Funding to redesigned proj-
  After publication of a decision that a
proposed project may  contaminate a
sole or principal  source  aquifer in a
designated area through  its recharge
zone so as to create a significant haz-
ard to public health, a commitment for
Federal financial assistance may be en-
tered into, if authorized under another
provision  of law,  to  plan or  redesign
such project to assure that it will not
so contaminate the aquifer.
                                    842

-------
                         FINDING AIDS
  A list of CFR titles, subtitles, chapters, subchapters and parts and an alphabet-
ical list of agencies publishing in the CFR are included in the CFR Index and
Finding Aids volume to the Code of Federal Regulations which is published sepa-
rately and revised annually.

  Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference
  Table of CFR Titles and Chapters
  Alphabetical List of Agencies Appearing in the CFR
  List of CFR Sections Affected
                                  843

-------

-------
      Material Approved for Incorporation  by Reference

                            (Revised as of July 1, 2004)

  The Director of the Federal Register has approved under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
1 CFR Part 51 the incorporation by reference of the following publications. This
list contains  only those incorporations by reference effective as of the revision
date  of this volume.  Incorporations by reference found within  a regulation  are
effective  upon the  effective date of that regulation. For more information on
incorporation by reference, see the preliminary pages of this volume.

40 CFR  (PARTS 136  TO 149)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                                                             40  CFR
American  National Standards Institute
  25 West  43rd Street, Fourth floor, New York, NY 10036; Telephone:
  (212) 642-4900
American  National  Standard on Photographic Processing Effluents,  136.3(a) Table IB,
  April 2,1975.                                                  Note 9
American  Public Health Association
  1015 Fifteenth Street NW., Washington, DC 20005; Telephone: (202)
  777-APHA
    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
    Joint Editorial Board, American Public Health Association, Amer-
    ican Waterworks  Association, and Water Environment Control
    Federation:
20th Edition, 1998	  136.3, Table 1A,
                                                                Note 4.  Tables IB,
                                                                1C, ID,  IE
19th Edition, 1995 	  136.3; Table 1A,
                                                                Note 4;  Tables IB,
                                                                1C, ID,  IE
18th Edition, 1992 	  136.3, Tables IA,
                                                                Note 4;  IB, 1C, ID,
                                                                IE
15th Edition, 1980 	  136.3(a) Table IB,
                                                                Note 30; Table ID
14th Edition, 1975 	  136.3(a) Table IB,
                                                                Notes 17 and 27
Selected Analytical Methods Approved and Cited by the United States  136.3(a) Table IB,
  Environmental Protection Agency, Supplement to the 15th Edition     Note 10; Table 1C,
  of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,     Note 6;  Table ID,
  1981.                                                          Note 6
American  Society for Microbiology
  1752 N Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036
Brenner, et al.: New Medium for the Simultaneous Detection of Total  136.3
  Coliforms and Escherichia coli in Water. Appl. Environ Microbial,
  59:3534-3544, 1993.
American  Society for Testing and Materials
  100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; Tele-
  phone: (610) 832-9585, FAX: (610) 832-9555

                                      845

-------
                         1C, ID, and IE
                        136.3, Tables IB, 1C,
                         ID, and IE

                        136.3
                        136.3
                        136.3(a) Table IB,
                         Note 21
                     Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                              40 CFR
Annual Book of ASTM Standards—Water, Section 11, Volumes 11.01  136.3(a) Tables IB,
  and 11.02, 1993.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Water and Environmental Tech-
  nology, Section 11, Volumes  11.01 and  11.02, 1994, 1996,  and
  1999.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Water and Environmental Tech-
  nology, Volume 11.02, 2002 edition,
AOAC International (Association of Official Analytical Chemists)
  481 North Frederick Avenue,  Suite 500, Gaithersburg,  Maryland
  20877-2417
Official Methods of Analysis,  16th  Edition, Volume 1,  Chapter 17,
  Method 991.15.
Bran & Luebbe Analyzing Technologies, Inc.
  Elmsford, NY 10523
Hydrogen Ion (pH) Automated Electrode Method, Industrial Method
  Number 378-75WA, October 1976, Bran & Luebbe (Techicon) Auto
  Analyzer II.
CEM Corporation
  P.O. Box 200, Matthews, North Carolina 28106-0200
Closed Vessel Microwave Digestion of Wastewater Samples for Deter-  136.3(a) Table IB,
  mination of Metals, April 16,1992.                                 Note 36
Fisons Instruments, Inc
  32 Commerce Center, Cherry Hill Drive, Danvers, MA 01923
Direct Current Plasma (DCP) Optical Emission  Spectrometric Method  136.3(a) Table IB,
  for  Trace Elemental Analysis of  Water  and Wastes, Method    Note 34
  AES0029,1986, revised 1991.
Hach  Company
  100 Dayton Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50010
m-ColiBlue24® test: "Total Coliforms and E. coli," Revision 2, 1999  136.3
1, 10-Phenanthroline Method Using  FerroVer Iron Reagent  for Water,  136.3(a) Table IB,
  Hach Method 8008,1980.                                         Note 22
Bicinchoninate Method for Copper, Method 8506, Hach Handbook  136.3(a) Table IB,
  of Water Analysis, 1979.                                          Note 19
Chemical Oxygen Demand, Method  8000, Hach Handbook of Water  136.3(a) Table IB,
  Analysis,  1979.                                                  Note 14
Nitrogen, Nitrite—Low Range, Diazotization Method for Water  and  136.3(a) Table IB,
  Wastewater, Hach Method 8507,1979.                              Note 25
Periodate Oxidation Method  for Manganese,  Method  8034, Hach  136.3(a) Table IB,
  Handbook for Water Analysis, 1979.                                Note 23
Zincon Method for  Zinc, Method 8009, Hach Handbook  for Water  136.3(a) Table IB,
  Analysis,  1979.                                                  Note 33
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
  One IDEXX Drive, Westbrook, Maine 04092
Colilert Method®, 2002 	  136.3
Colilert-18® Method, 2002 	  136.3
Enterolert® Method, 2002 	  136.3
Quanti-Tray® Method, 2002	  136.3
Quanti-tray/2002® Method 	  136.3
Journal of Chromatography
  Available  from: Elsevier/North-Holland,  Inc., Journal  Information
  Centre, 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10164
846

-------
                        136.3(a) Table IB,
                          Note 18
                        136.3
                        136.3
            Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO  149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY-Continued
                                                              40 CFR
Direct Determination of Elemental Phosphorous by Gas-Liquid Chro-  136.3(a) Table IB,
  matography, by R.F. Addison and R.G. Ackman, Journal of Chroma-    Note 28
  tography, Volume 47, No. 3, pp. 421-426, 1970.
National Council of the Paper  Industry for Air  and Stream Improvements, Inc.
  260 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
An Investigation of Improved Procedures for Measurement  of Mill
  Effluent and Receiving Water  Color, NCASI Technical Bulletin No.
  253, December 1971.
National Technical Information Service
  5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161
Method OIA-1677, "Available  Cyanide  by Flow Injection,  Ligand
  Exchange, and Amperometry," PB99-132011, August 1999,.
Method 1631, Revision E, "Mercury in  Water by Oxidation, Purge
  and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry" Sep-
  tember 2002, Office of Water, US EPA, (EPA-821-R-02-019)..
EPA-821-R-02/012"Methods  for  Measuring  the  Acute  Toxicity of  136.3
  Effluents and Receiving Waters to  Freahwater and Marine Orga-
  nisms," Fifth Edition, October 2002.
Oceanography International Corporation
  512 West Loop, P.O. Box 2980, College Station, TX 77840
QIC Chemical Oxygen Demand Method, 1978 	  136.3(a) Table IB,
                                                                 Note 13
ORION Research Incorporated
  840 Memorial Dr., Cambridge, MA 02138
ORION  Research Instruction Manual, Residual  Chlorine  Electrode
  Model 97-70, 1977.
Perstorp Analytical Corporation
  1256 Stockton St., Helena, CA 94574
Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl, Method PAl-DkOl, (Block Digestion, Steam
  Distillation, Tritrimetric Detection), Revised December  22, 1994.
Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl, Method PAl-Dk02, (Block Digestion, Steam
  Distillation, Colorimetric Detection), Revised December 22, 1994.
Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl, Method PAl-Dk03, (Block Digestion, Steam
  Distillation, Automated  FIA Gas Diffusion), Revised December 22,
  1994.
Technicon Industrial Systems
  Tarrytown, New York 10591
Ammonia, Automated Electrode Method, Industrial Method Number
  379-75WE,  dated  February 19,  1976, Technicon  Auto  Analyzer
  II.
J.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, ORD publications, CERI
  Cincinnati, OH 45268
vtethods  for   Benzidine,  Chlorinated   Organic   Compounds,
  Pentachlorophenol and  Pesticides in Water  and Wastewater, U.S.
  Environmental Protection Agency, 1978.
iPA-600/4-79-020: "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water  and
  Wastes," U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, March 1979, or
  "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," U.S. Envi-
  ronmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/4-79-020, Revised March
  1983.
 IPA-821-R-01-025: Method 1623: "Cryptosporidium and Giardia in
  Water by Filtration/IMS/FA," U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
  cy, April 2001.
                        136.3(a) Table IB,
                          Note 16
                        136.3(a), Table IB,
                          Note 39
                        136.3(a), Table IB,
                          Note 40
                        136.3(a), Table IB,
                          Note 41
                        136.3(a) Table IB,
                          Note 7
                        136.3(a) Table 1C,
                          Note 3; Table ID,
                          Note 3
                        136.3(a) Table IB,
                          Notes 1 and 4
                        136.3
847

-------
                     Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued

EPA-821-R-01-026:  Method 1622: "Cryptosporidium in Water by
  Filtration/IMS/FA," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, April
  2001.
EPA-821-R-02-020:  Method 1103.1:  "Escherichia coli  (E  coli)  in
  Water by  Membrane  Filtration  Using Membrane-Thermotolerant
  Escherichia coli Agar (mTEC), September 2002.
EPA-821-R-02-021: Method 1106.1: "Enterococci in Water by Mem-
  brane Filtration Using Membrane-Enterococcus-Esculin Iron Agar
  (mE-EIA), September 2002.
EPA-821-R-02-022: Method 1600: "Enterococci  in Water by Mem-
  brane Filtration Using Membrane-Enterococcus-Indoxyl-p-D-Gluco-
  side Agar (mEI), September 2002.
EPA-821-R-02-023: Method 1603: "Escherichia Coli (E. coli) in Water
  by Membrane Filtration Using Modified Membrane-thermotolerant
  Escherichia-coli Agar (Modified mTEC), September 2002.
EPA-821-R-02-024: Method 1604: Total coliforms and  Escherichia
  coli (E. coli) in Water by Membrane Filtration Using a Simultaneous
  Detection Technique (MI Medium), September 2002.
EPA-600/1-80-031:  Cabelli, V.J.,  "Health Effects  Criteria for Marine
  Recreational Waters" August 1983.
EPA-600/1-84-004:  Dufour, A.P.,  "Health Effects Criteria for Fresh
  Recreational Waters" August 1984.
Microbiological  Methods for Monitoring the Environment, Water and
  Wastes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/8-78-017,
  1978.
Organochlorine  Pesticides  and PCBs  in Wastewater  Using  Empore
  TM Disk, Revised October 28, 1994.
Prescribed Procedures for Measurement of Radioactivity in Drinking
  Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600/4-80-032,
  1980.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Resource Center
  Washington, DC 20460
Short-Term Methods for  Estimating the Chronic Toxicity  of Effluents  136.3
  and  Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms, Fourth  Edition,
  October 2002 (EPA 821/R-02/013).
Short-Term Methods for  Estimating the Chronic Toxicity  of Effluents  136.3
  and Receiving Waters  to Marine and Estuarine Organisms, Third
  Edition, October 2002 (EPA 821/R-02/014).
Method 1664, Revision A, n-Hexane Extractable  Material (HEM; Oil  136.3
  and Grease) and Silica Gel Treated  n-Hexane Extractable  Material
  (SGT-HEM; Non-polar material) by Extraction and Gravimetry, Feb-
  ruary 1999 (EPA-821-R-98-002).
  The following standard is available from: National Technical Infor-
  mation Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161
EPA-821-B-98-016,  Analytical Methods  for the Determination  of  136.3
  Pollutants in  Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Wastewater,
  July 1998.
EPA Method 526:  Determination  of Selected Semivolatile  Organic  141.40
  Compounds in Drinking Water by Solid Phase Extraction and Cap-
  illary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (CC/MS),
  Revision 1.0, June 2000.

U.S. Geological Survey
  Denver Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225
40 CFR
 136.3
 136.3


 136.3


 136.3


 136.3


 136.3


 136.3

 136.3

 136.3(a) Table IA,
   Note 3

 136.3(b)(33)

 136.3(a) Table IE,
   Note 1
                                        848

-------
             Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference
40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued

Methods for Collection and Analysis of Aquatic Biological and Micro-
  biological Samples, edited by Britton, L.J. and P.E. Greason, Tech-
  niques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological
  Survey, Book 5, Chapter Al (1989).
Methods for Determination  of Inorganic  Substances  in Water and
  Fluvial Sediments, N.W. Skougstad and others, editors, Techniques
  of Water-Resources Investigations  of the  U.S. Geological  Survey,
  Book 5, Chapter Al (1979).
Methods for Determination  of Inorganic  Substances  in Water and
  Fluvial Sediments, M.J. Fishman and Linda C. Friedman, Tech-
  niques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological
  Survey, Book 5, Chapter Al (1989).
Methods for the  Determination of Organic Substances in Water and
  Fluvial Sediments, Wershaw, R.L.,  et  al, Techniques of Water-
  Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey, Book  5,
  Chapter A3 (1987).
Selected Methods  of the U.S. Geological  Survey of  Analysis  of
  Wastewaters, by M.J. Fishman and Eugene Brown; U.S. Geological
  Survey Open File Report 76-77 (1976).
Water Temperature—Influential Factors, Field Measurement and Data
  Presentation, by H.H. Stevens, Jr., J.  Ficke, and G.F. Smoot, Tech-
  niques of Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological
  Survey, Book 1, Chapter Dl, 1975.
Open File Report 00-170: Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological
  Survey National Water  Quality Laboratory—Determination of Am-
  monium  Plus Organic Nitrogen by  a Kjeldahl Digestion Method
  and an Automated Photometric Finish that Includes Digest Cleanup
  by Gas Diffusion, 2000.
Dpen File Report 92-146: Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological
  Survey National Water Quality Laboratory—Determination of Total
  Phosphorous by  a Kjeldahl Digestion Method and an Automated
  Colorimetric Finish that Includes Dialysis, 1992.
3pen File Report 93-125: Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological
  Survey National Water Quality Laboratory—Determination of Inor-
  ganic and Organic Constituents  in Water and Fluvial Sediments,
  1993.
3pen File Report 93-449: Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological
  Survey National Water Quality Laboratory—Determination of Chro-
  mium  in  Water by  Graphite  Furnace   Atomic  Absorption
  Spectrophotometry, 1993.
Jpen File Report 94-37: Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological
  Survey National Water  Quality Laboratory—Determination of Tri-
  azine and Other Nitrogen-Containing Compounds by Gas Chroma-
  tography, 1994.
)pen File Report 97-198: Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological
  Survey National Water Quality Laboratory—Determination of Mo-
  lybdenum in  Water by   Graphite   Furnace  Atomic  Absorption
  Spectrophotometry, 1997.
 pen File Report 98-165: Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological
  Survey National Water Quality Laboratory—Determination of Ele-
  ments in Whole-Water Digests Using Inductively Coupled Plasma—
  Optical Emission  Spectrometry and  Inductively  Coupled Plasma-
  Mass Spectrometry, 1998.
40 CFR
 136.3(a) Table LA
 136.3(a) Table IB,
   Note 8
 136.3(a) Table IB,
   Note 2
 136.3(a) Table IB,
   Note 24; Table ID,
   Note 4

 136.3(a) Table IE,
   Note 2

 136.3(a) Table IB,
   Note 32
 136.3
 136.3
 136.3
 136.3
 136.3
 136.3
 136.3
                                       849

-------
                     Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO  149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                              40 CFR
Open File Report 98-639: Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological  136.3
  Survey National Water  Quality Laboratory—Determination of Ar-
  senic and Selenium in Water and Sediment by Graphite Furnace-
  Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, 1999.

40 CFR (PART 141): WATER PROGRAMS

AOAC International (Association of Official Analytical Chemists)
  First Union  National Bank Lockbox, P.O. Box 75198, Baltimore,
  MD 21275-5198
Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical  141.40
  Chemists, Volume 1,16th Edition, 4th Revision (1998).

American Public Health Association
  1015 Fifteenth Street, NW, Washington DC 20005
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water,  141.21; 141.23;
  18th Edition, 1992; 19th Edition, 1995; 20th Edition, 1998.             141.24; 141.25;
                                                                 141.40; 141.74;
                                                                 143.4
Methods  6200 B,  2130 B, 2550, 4500-CI,  D, E, F, G,  H, I; 4500-  141.40
  CIO2D, E, 4500-H*B, and 4500-03  B,  Standard  Methods  for the
  Examination of Water and Waste Water, 20th Edition, 1998.
Method 3125, "Metals by Inductively Coupled Plasma/Mass Spectrom-  141.25
  etry" as published  in "Standard Methods for the Examination  of
  Water and Waste Water," 20th Edition, 1998.

American Society for Testing and Materials
  100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; Tele-
  phone: (610) 832-9585, FAX: (610) 832-9555
ASTM D 5673-03 Standard Test Method for  Elements in Water by  141.25
  Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry.
Annual Book of ASTM  Standards—Water  and Environment Tech-  141.24
  nology—Section 11, Volume 11.02, 1999.

American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation
  Available from American Public Health Association, 1015 Fifteenth
  Street NW., Washington, DC 20005; Telephone: (202) 777-APHA
Selected Analytical Methods Approved and Cited by the United States
  Environmental Protection Agency, Supplement to the 16th Edition
  of Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
  1985:
  Methods  908C pp. 878-880; 908D  pp. 880-882;  909C pp. 896-  141.74(a)
  898;  908A pp. 872-876; 908B  pp.  876-878; 908D pp. 880-882;
  909A pp. 887-894; 909B  pp. 894-896; 907A pp. 864-866; 214A
  pp. 134-136; 408C pp.  303-306; 408D pp. 306-309; 408E pp. 309-
  310;  408F pp. 310-313; 410B  pp.  322-323; 410C pp. 323-324;
  212 pp. 126-127; 423 pp. 429-437.
  Methods  908, 908A, and 908B pp. 870-878; Method  908E pp.  141.21(f)
  882-886;  Methods  909,  909A,  and 909B pp. 886-896; Nutrient
  Agar p. 874; EC Medium p. 879.
Standard Methods  for the Examination of Water and  Wastewater,
  18th Edition Supplement, 1994:
  Standard  Methods for the Examination of Water  and  Wastewater,  141.21; 141.23;
  18th Edition, 1992.                                               141.24; 141.40;
                                                                 141.74; 143.4
  Method 6610, Carbamate Pesticides Method 	  141.24; 141.40

                                        850

-------
            Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference
40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149}—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                             40 CFR
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water,  141.21; 141.23;
  19th Edition, 1995.                                              141.24; 141.40;
                                                                141.74; 141.142;
                                                                143.4
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,  141.31
  19th Edition, 1995; Supplement, 1996.
Methods 6200 B, 2130  B,  2550; 4500-CI, D, E,  F, G, H, I; 4500-  141.40
  CIO2D, E, 4500-H+B, and 4500-O3  B,  Standard Methods for the
  Examination of Water and Waste Water, 20th Edition, 1998.
American Society for Testing and Materials
  100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; Tele-
  phone: (610) 832-9585, FAX: (610) 832-9555
ASTM D 511-88 Standard Test Methods for Calcium and Magnesium  141.89
  in Water.
ASTM D 515-88 Standard Test Methods for Phosphorus  in Water  141.89
ASTM D 859-88 Standard Test Method for Silica in Water 	  141.89
ASTM D 1067-88 Standard Test Methods for Acidity or  Alkalinity  141.89
  of Water.
ASTM D 1125-82 Standard Test Methods for Electrical Conductivity  141.89
  and Resistivity of Water.
ASTM D 1293-84 Standard Test Methods for pH of Water 	  141.89
ASTM D 1688-90 Standard Test Methods for Copper in Water	  141.89
ASTM D 2459-75 Gamma Spectrometry in Water 	  141.25(a)(6)
ASTM  D 2907-75  Micro-quantities   of  Uranium  in Water  by  141.25(a)(7)
  Flourometry.
ASTM D 3559-85 Standard Test Methods for Lead in Water  	  141.89
ASTM D 4327-88 Standard Test Method for Anions in Water by  141.89
  Ion Chromatography.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1993, Volume 11 	  141.23; 143.4
Annual  Book of ASTM  Standards, Water and Environmental Tech-  141.23; 141.25;
  nology, Section 11, Volumes 11.01 and 11.02,1999.                  143.4
Annual  Book of ASTM Standards,  1994 and 1996, Volume 11.01  141.40
Annual  Book of ASTM Standards,  1996 and 1998, Volume 11.02  141.40
ASTM D 1293-95, Standard Test Methods for pH of Water 	  141.40
ASTM D  5317-93,  Standard  Test  Method for Determination  of  141.40
  Chlorinated Organic Acid Compounds in Water by Gas Chroma-
  tography with an Electron Capture Detector.
ASTM D  5790-95,  Standard   Test Method  for  Measurement  of  141.40
  Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas
  Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.
ASTM D  5812-96,  Standard  Test  Method for Determination  of  141.40
  Organochlorine Pesticides in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chro-
  matography.
\nnual  Book of ASTM Standards 1994; Vol. 11.01, 1994 edition  141.31
  and 1996 edition.
\nnual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994 and 1996, Vol. 11.01  	  141.23; 141.40;
                                                                143.4
\nnual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994 and 1996, Vol. 11:02  	  141.24; 143.4
Vnnual Book of ASTM Standards, 1996 and 1998, Vol. 11.02  	  141.40
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1994, Vol. 11:02 	  141.25
 iinerican Water Works Association Research Foundation
  Customer Service, 6666 West  Quincy Avenue,  Denver, CO 80235;
  Telephone: 303-794-7711

                                       851

-------
                     Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                               40 CFR
Guidance Manual for Compliance with the Filtration and Disinfection  141.142
  Requirements  for Public  Water Systems  Using  Surface  Water
  Sources, 1991, Appendices C and O.
Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA Environ-  141.89
  mental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati,  OH (EPA-
  600/4-79-020), Revised March 1983,  Procedures  239.2,  220.2,
  220.1, 150.1, 150.2, 120.1, 215.2, 215.1, 310.1, 365.1, 365.3,  365.2,
  and 370.1 located at pp.  239.2-1 through 239.2-2 and metals -1
  through metals-19, 220.2-1 through 220.2-2  and metals-1 through
  metals-19, 220.1-1 through 220.1-2 and metals-1  through metals-
  19, 150.1-1  through 150.1-3, 150.2-1  through 150.2-3,  120.1-1
  through 120.1-3, 215.2-1 through 215.2-3, 215.1-1 through 215.1-
  2,  310.1-1 through 310.1-3,  365.1-1 through 365.1-9,  365.3-1
  through 365.3^1, 365.2-1 through 365.2-6,  and 370.1-1  through
  370.1-5.
National Field Evaluation of a Defined  Substrate  Method for the  141.21[a); 141.74(a)
  Simultaneous Enumeration of Total Coliforms and Escherichia coli
  from Drinking Water: Comparison with the Standard Multiple Tube
  Fermentation Method,  Stephen C. Edberg, Martin J. Allen, Darwell
  B.  Smith, and the National  Collaborative Study,  which appears
  in  Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 54,  pages
  1595-1601, June 1988, as  amended under Erratum, Applied  and
  Environmental Microbiology, Volume 54, page 3197.
National Field Evaluation of a Defined  Substrate  Method for the  141.21(f)
  Simultaneous Detection of Total Coliforms  and Escherichia  coli
  from Drinking Water: Comparison with Presence-Absence  Tech-
  niques,  Stephen C.  Edberg,  Martin  ].  Allen,  Darwell  B. Smith,
  and the National Collaborative Study, which appears in  Applied
  and Environmental Microbiology, Volume 55, No. 4 pages  1003-
  1008, April 1989, published by the American Society for Microbi-
  ology.
New Medium for the Simultaneous Detection of Total coliforms and  141.21; 141.74
  Escherichia coli in Water,  Kristen P. Brenner, Clifford  C. Rankin,
  Yvette R. Roybal, Gerald  N.  Stelma,  Jr., Pasquale V. Scarpino,
  and Alfred P. Dufour, which appears in Applied and Environmental
  Microbiology, Vol. 59, No. 11, pages 3534-3544, November 1993,
  published by the American Society for Microbiology.
Standard Methods for the Examination  of Water and Wastewater,  141.89
  17th Edition, American Public Health Association, American Water
  Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, 1989,  Pro-
  cedures 3113,  3111-B, 3120, 4500-H+, 2510,  3500-Ca-D, 3120,
  2320, 4500-P-F, 4500-P-E, 4110, 4500-Si-D,  4500-Si-E,  4500-
  Si-F, and 2500 located at pp.  3-32 through 3-43, 3-20 through
  3-23, 3-53 through 3-63, 4-94 through 4-102, 2-57 through 2-
  61, 3-85 through 3-87, 2-35 through 2-39,  4-178 through 4-181,
  4-177 through 4-178, 4-2 through 4-6, 4-184 through 4-187, 4-
  188 through 4-191, and 2-80 through 2-81.
Analytical Technology, Inc.  Orion
  529 Main St., Boston, MA 02129
Analytical Technology, Inc.  Orion, Technical Bulletin 601, Standard  141.23
  Method of Test for Nitrate in Drinking Water, PN  221890-001,
  dated July 1994.
AOAC International (Association of Official Analytical Chemist)
  First Union  National Bank Lockbox,  P.O. Box 75198,  Baltimore,
  MD 21275-5198


                                        852

-------
             Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                              40 CFR
Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical   141.40
  Chemists, Vol. I (16th Edition, 4th Revision, 1998).
Charm Sciences, Inc.
  36 Franklin Street, Maiden, MD 02148
Ecolite Test,  "Presence/Absence for Coliforms and E.coli in Water"   141.21
  dated December 21,1997.
CPI International,  Inc.
  5580 Skylane Boulevard, Santa Rosa, California 95403
"Colitag Product as  a Test for Detection and Identification of Coliforms   141.21(f){3)
  and Escherichia Coli Bacteria in Drinking Water and Source Water
  as Required in National Primary Drinking Water Regulations," Au-
  gust 2001.
Department of Commerce
  National Institute of Standard and Technology (formerly National
  Bureau of Standards), Washington, DC 20234
Handbook No. 69, Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Permis-   141.16(b); 141.66
  sible Concentrations of Radionuclides  in Air or Water for Occupa-
  tional Exposure, August 1963.
Department of Commerce
  National Technical  Information  Service,  5285  Port  Royal  Rd.,
  Springfield,  VA  22161;  Telephone: (703) 487-4650, FAX: (703)
  487-4142
Interim Radiochemical Methodology for Drinking Water, EPA  600/   141.25
  4-75-008 (revised), March 1976.
Prescribed Procedures  for Measurement  of Radioactivity in Drinking   141.25
  Water, EPA 600/4-80-032, August 1980.
Method 200.8:  "Determination of Trace  Elements in Waters and   141.25
  Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry" Revi-
  sion 5.4, as published in "Methods for the Determination of Metals
  in Environmental Samples—Supplement 1," EPA-600/R-94-111,
  May 1994.
Radiochemical Analytical Procedures for Analysis of Environmental   141.25
  Samples, March 1979.
Radiochemistry Procedures  Manual, EPA  520/5-84-006, December   141.25
  1987.
Standard Methods  for  the Examination of Water  and Wastewater,   141.25
  13th, 17th,  18th, and 19th Editions, 1971,  1989,  1992, and  1995.
Technical Notes on Drinking Water Methods, EPA-600/R-94-173,   141.40
  October 1994.
Methods  for the Determination of Inorganic Substances in Environ-   141.40
  mental Samples, EPA-600/R-93-100, August 1993.
EPA Method 515.3: Determination of Chlorinated Acids in Drinking   141.40
  Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction, Derivatization and Gas Chroma-
  tography with Electron Capture Detection, Revision 1,0, )uly  1996.
EPA Method 515.4: Determination of Chlorinated Acids in Drinking   141.24;  141.40
  Water by Liquid-Liquid Microextraction, Derivatization and Fas
  Gas Chromatography with Electron Capture Detection, Revision
  1.0, April 2000, EPA  815/B-00/001.
SPA Method  528:  Determination of Phenols  in Drinking Water by   141.40
  Solid Phase Extraction and Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/
  Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Revision 1.0, April 2000.
iPA Method 532: Determination of Phenylurea Compounds in Drink-   141.40
  ing Water by Solid Phase Extraction and High-Performance Liquid
  Chromatography with UV Detection, Revision 1.0, June 2000.


                                       853

-------
                     Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO  149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                              40 CFR
EPA Method 1605: Aeromonas in Finished Water by Membrane Filtra-  141.40
  tion  Using Ampicillin-Dextrin Agar with Vancomycin (ADA-V);
  October 2001, EPA 821-R-01-034.
EPA Method 531.2:  Measurement of n-Methylcarbamoyloximes and  141.24
  n-Methylcarbamates in  Water  by  Direct Aqueous  Injection HPLC
  with Postcolumn Derivatization (EPA 815-B-01-002), Revision 1.0,
  September 2001.
Method AG-625: Atazine  in Drinking Water by Immunoassay, Feb-  141.24
  ruary 2001.
EPA-821-B-01-009, Method Kelada-01: Kelada Automated Test Meth-  141.23
  ods for Total Cyanide, Acid Dissociable Cyanide, and Thiocyanate,
  Revision 1.2, August 2001.
Hach   Method   10133:   Determination  of  Turbidity  by  Laser  141.74
  Nephelometry, Revision 2.0, January 7, 2000.
Chromocult  Coliform Agar Presence/Absence Membrane Filter Test  141.21
  Method for Detection and Identification of Coliform Bacteria and
  Escherichla Coli in Finished Waters, Version 1.0,  November 2000.
Readycult Coliforms  100  Presence/Absence  Test for Detection and  141.21
  Identification of Coliform Bacteria and Escherichla Coli in Finished
  Waters, Version 1.0, November  2000.
IDEXX SimPlate HPC Test Method for Heterotrophs in Water, Novem-  141.74
  her 29, 2000.
QuickChem Method 10-204-00-1-X: Digestion and Distillation of Total  141.24
  Cyanide in Drinking and Wastewaters using MICRO DIST and Deter-
  mination  of Cyanide by  Flow Injection Analysis, Revision  2.1,
  November 30, 2000.

U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, NERL 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive,
Cincinnati Ohio 45268
Method 150.1 Electrometric (1978 and 1982) 	  141.40
Method 150.2 pH, Continuous Monitoring,  Electrometric (December  141.40
  1982).

EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline
  800-426-4791  (Hours are Monday through Friday, excluding Federal
  holidays, from 9:00 am to 5:30 pm Eastern Standard Time.)

Department  of Energy
  Environmental Measurements  Laboratory, 376 Hudson St., New
  York, NY 10014-3621
EML Procedures Manual, 27th Edition, Vol. 1,1990 	  141.25
EML Procedures Manual,  HASL-300, Volume 1: Gamma Radioassay,  141.25
  28th Edition, February 1997.
EML Procedures Manual,  HASL-300, Volume 1: Radium-226 in Tap  141.25
  Water, Urine, and Feces, 28th Edition, February 1997.
EML Procedures Manual,  HASL-300, Volume II: Strontium-89, 28th  141.25
  Edition, February 1997.
EML Procedures Manual,  HASL-300, Volume II: Strontium-90, 28th  141.25
  Edition, February 1997.
EML Procedures Manual, HASL-300, Volume I:  Isotopic  Uranium  141.25
  in Biological and Environmental Materials, 28th Edition,  February
  1997.
EML Procedures Manual,  HASL-300, Volume II: Uranium in Biologi-  141.25
  cal and Environmental Materials, 28th Edition, February 1997.
HASL Procedures Manual HASL—300,1978 	  141.25(b)(2)


                                       854

-------
             Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference

 40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                              40 CFR
 Environmental Protection Agency
   Environmental Monitoring &  Support  Laboratory (EMSL), 25 W.
   St. CJair St., Cincinnati, OH 45268
 Interim Radiochemical Methodology for Drinking Water, EMSL, EPA-   141.25(a)
   600/4-75-008.
 Microbiological Methods for Monitoring the Environment, Water and   141.2l(f)
   Wastes, U.S. EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Labora-
  tory (EPA-600/8-78-017), December 1978; Part III, Section B.2.1—
   2.6, pp. 108-112; Part III, Section B.4.1—4.6.4, pp. 114-118.
  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Waste Characteriza-
  tion Branch, Washington, DC 20460
  The above standards are also available at the Office of Drinking
  Water, Criteria and  Standards Division, Environmental Protection
  Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460
  NERL, 26 W.  Martin Luther  King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268
 Method 150.1 Electrometric (1978 and 1982 	   141.40
 Method 151.2pH, Continuous Monitoring,  Electrometric (December   141.40
  1982).
 Method 549.2, Determination of Disquat and Paraquat in  Drinking   141.24
  Water  by  Liquid-Solid Extraction and High Performance  Liquid
  Chromatography with Ultraviolet Detection, Revision 1.0, EPA/815/
  B-99/002, June 1997.
 Method 515.3, Determination of Chlorinated Acids in Drinking Water   141.24
  by  Liquid-Liquid Extraction, Derivatization  and   Gas  Chroma-
  tography with Electron Capture Detection, Revision  1.0, EPA 815/
  B-99-001,July 1996.
  Available  from: National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port
  Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161
 Method 300.1 Determination  of Inorganic Anions in Drinking Water   141.31
  by Ion Chromatography, Revision 1.0, 1997 (EPA/600/R-98/118).
 Methods for the  Determination of Organic Compounds in  Drinking   141.31
  Water, Supp. II, August 1992 (EPA 600/R-92-129).
 Methods for the  Determination of Organic Compounds in  Drinking   141.31
  Water, Supp. Ill, August 1995 (EPA 600/R-95-131).
 Methods for Determination of Inorganic Substances in  Environmental   141.31;  141.40;
  Samples, August 1993 (EPA 600/R-93-100).                         141.74; 143.4
 Technical Notes  on Drinking Water Methods, EPA-600/R-94-173,   141.40
  October 1994.
 Method 314.0, Determination of Perchlorate in Drinking Water Using   141.40
  Ion Chromatography, EPA 815-B-99-003, Revision  1.0, November
  1999.
  Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Lab-
  oratory (NERL) 26 West Martin Luther King Drive Cincinnati, Ohio
  45268
Determination of Ozone in Water by the Indigo Method; A Submitted   141,74(a)
  Standard Method, H.  Bader and J. Hoigne; Ozone Science and
  Engineering, Volume 4, pp. 169-176, 1982.
 Great Lakes Instruments, Inc.
  8855 North 55th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53223
GLI Method 2, Turbidity, dated November 2, 1992	   141.40;  141.74
Hatch Company
  100 Dayton Avenue, Ames, IA 50010
Method No.  10029, m-ColiBlue24 Broth,  Total Coliforma and E.coJi   141.21
  Membrane Filteration Method, Revision 2, dated August  17, 1999.

                                       855

      203-160  D-28

-------
                     Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO  149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                              40 £FR
Millipore Corporation
  Technical Services Department, 80 Ashby Road, Bedford, MA 01730
Millipore Corporation, Method AN208, Colisure  Presence/Absence  141.21
  Test for Detection and Identification of Coliform Bacteria and Esch-
  erichia coli in Drinking Water, dated February 28,1994.
Palintest, LTD
  21 Kenton Lands Road, P.O. Box 18395, Erlanger, KY 41018
Method 1001, Lead in Drinking Water by Differential Pulse Anodic  141.23
  Stripping Voltammetry, August 1999.

Radiological Sciences Institute Center for Laboratories and  Research, New York State
Department of Health
  Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12201
Determination of Ra-226 and Ra-228 (Ra-02), January, 1980	  141.25
State of New Jersey Department  of Environmental  Protection, Division of Environmental
Quality, Bureau of Radiation and Inorganic Analytical Services
  9 Ewing Street, Trenton, NJ 08625
Determination of Radium 228 in Drinking Water, August 1980 	  141.25
Technicon Industrial Systems, c/o Bran & Luebbe
  1025 Busch Parkway, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089
Technicon Industrial Systems, Industrial Method No. 129-71W, Fluo-  141.23
  ride in Water and Wastewater dated December 1972, and Method
  No. 380-75WE,  Fluoride in Water and Wastewater, dated February
  1976.
U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the  Interior
  Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425,
  Denver, CO 80225
Methods for Determination of Inorganic Substances in Water and  141.89
  Fluvial Sediments, 3rd  edition, U.S. Department  of Interior, U.S.
  Geological Survey, 1989, Procedures 1-1030-85,1-1601-85,1-2601-
  85, 1-2598-85,  1-1700-85, and 1-2700-85 located at pp.  55-56,
  381-382, 383-385, 387-388, 415-416, and 417-419.
U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the  Interior
  USGL Information  Services,  Box 25286, Federal  Center, Denver,
  CO 80225-0425
Methods for Determination of Radioactive Substances in Water and  141.25
  Fluvial Sediments,  Chapter A5 in Book 5 of Techniques  of Water-
  Resources Investigations of the United  States Geological Survey,
  1977.
Techniques of Water Resources Investigation of the U.S. Geological  141.23
  Survey, Book 5, Chapter A-I, 3rd edtion, Methods 1-1030-85; I-
  1601-85; 1-2598-85; 1-1700-85; 1-2700-85; 1-3300-85.
Techniques of Water Resources Investigation of the U.S. Geological  143.4
  Survey, Book  5, Chapter A-I, 3rd edition, Method 1-3720-85.
State Statutes and Regulations (PART 147):  STATE UNDERGROUND INJECTOR
CONTROL  PROGRAMS
Alabama: (1) Code of Alabama,  section  9-17-1 through 9-17-109  147.50(a)
  (Cumm. Supp.  1989);  (2) State Oil and  Gas Board of Alabama
  Administrative Code, Oil and Gas Report 1  (supplemented through
  May 1989), Rules and Regulations Governing the Conservation of
  Oil and Gas  in Alabama, and Oil and Gas  Statutes of Alabama
  with Oil and Gas in Alabama, and Oil and Gas Statutes of Alabama
  with Oil and Gas Board Forms, 400-1-2, and 400-1-5-.04.

                                        856

-------
             Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                               40 CFR
Alabama; (1) Alabama Water Pollution Control Act, Code of Alabama  I47.51(a)
  1975, §§22-22-1 through 22-22-14  (1980 and Supp. 1983);  (2)
  Regulations, Policies and  Procedures of the Alabama Water Im-
  provement Commission, Title I (Regulations) (Rev. December 1980),
  as amended May 17, 1982,  to add Chapter 9, Underground Injection
  Control  Regulations (effective June 10, 1982),  as amended April
  6,1983 (effective May 11, 1983).
Alabama: (1)  Rule  400-4-1-.02, Definitions; Rule 400-4-5-.04, Pro-  147.52(a)
  tection of Underground Sources of Drinking Water during the Hy-
  draulic Fracturing of Coal Beds.
Alaska: (1) Alaska Statutes,  Alaska  Oil and Gas Conservation Act,  147.100(a)
  Title 31,  Sections 31.05.005 through 31.30.010 (1979 and  Cumm.
  Supp. 1984);  (2) Alaska Statutes,  Administrative Procedures Act,
  Title 44,  Sections 44.62.010 through 44.62.650 (1984); (3) Alaska
  Administrative Code, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission,
  20 AAC 25.005 through 20 AAC 25.570 (Supp. 1986).
Indiana: (1) Indiana Code, title 4, article 21.5,  chapters 1 through  147.750
  6 (1988); (2)  West's Annotated Indiana Code,  title 13, article 8,
  chapters  1 through 15 (1990 and Cumm. Supp. 1990); (3) Indiana
  Administrative Code, title 310, article 7, rules 1 through 3 (Cumm.
  Supp. 1991).
Arkansas:  (1) Arkansas  Water and  Air Pollution Control Act,  Act  147.200(a)
  472 of 1949 as amended, Arkansas Statutes Annotated §§ 82-1901
  through 82-1943 (1976); (2) Act  105 of 1939, Arkansas Statutes
  Annotated §§53-101 through  53-130 (1971 and Supp. 1981); Act
  937 of 1979, Arkansas Statutes Annotated  §§53-1301  through 53-
  1320 (Supp. 1981);  Act 523 of 1981;  (3) Arkansas Underground
  Injection  Control Code, Department of Pollution Control and Ecol-
  ogy,  promulgated January  22,  1982; (4)  General Rule  and Regula-
  tions, Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission (Order No. 2-39,  revised
  July  1972);  [5) Arkansas Hazardous Waste Management Code, De-
  partment of Pollution  Control and Ecology, promulgated  August
  21, 1981.
California: (1) California  Public Resources Code,  California Laws for  I47.250(a)
  Conservation  of  Petroleum and Gas, Div. 3,  Chapt. 1,  sections
  3000-3359  (1989); (2) California  Administrative Code, Title 14,
  section 1710 through 1724.10 (May 28, 1988).
Colorado: (1)  Colorado Revised  Statutes, 1989 replacement volume,  147.300(a)
  Section 34-60-101 through 34-60-123; (2) Colorado Revised Stat-
  utes, 1989  replacement volume,  Section  25-8-101  through  25-
  8-612; (3) Rules  and Regulations, Rules of Practice and Procedure,
  and Oil and Gas Conservation Act (as  amended), Department of
  Natural Resources, Oil and Gas Conservation Commission  of the
  State of Colorado (revised July 1989); (4) Oil and Gas Conservation
  Commission Revised Rules and Regulations in  the 300, 400, 500,
  and 600 series, effective March 20, 1989.
Connecticut: (1) Connecticut General Statutes Annotated,  Title 22a
  (Environmental  Protection), Chapter 439, Sections 22a-l through
  22a-27 (1985 and  Cumm. Supp.  1990); (2) Connecticut General
  Statutes Annotated, Title  22a (Environmental Protection), Chapter
  446K (1985 and Cumm. Supp. 1990).
147.350(a)
                                        857

-------
                      Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                               40 CFR
Delaware: (1) Delaware Environmental Protection Act (Environmental  147.400(a)
  Control),  7 Delaware Code Annotated, Chapter 60, Sections 6001
  through 6060  (Revised 1974 and Cumm. Supp.  1988); (2) State
  of Delaware Regulations Governing Underground Injection Control,
  Parts  122, 124, and  146 (Department of Natural  Resources and
  Environmental Control), effective August 15, 1983.
Florida: (1)  Florida Air and Water Pollution Control Act,  Florida  147.500(a)
  Statutes Annotated §§403.011^03.90 (1973 and Supp.  1983); (2)
  Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 17-28, Underground Injection
  Control (April 27, 1989).
Georgia: (1)  Oil  and Gas Deep Drilling Act of 1975, Official Code  147.550(a)
  of Georgia Annotated (O.C.G.A.), sections 12-4-40  through 12-
  4-53 (1988);  (2) Ground Water Use Act of 1972, O.C.G.A., sections
  15-2-90 through 12-5-107 (1988); (3) Water Well Standards Act
  of 1985,  O.C.G.A., sections 12-5-120 through 12-5-138  (1988);
  (4) Georgia Administrative Procedure Act, O.C.G.A., sections 50-
  13-1  through  50-13-22 (Reprinted  from the O.C.G.A  and 1988
  Cumm. Supp.); (5) Georgia Water Quality Control Act, O.C.G.A.,
  sections 12-5-20 through  12-5-53 (1988);  (6) Georgia Hazardous
  Waste Management Act, O.C.G.A., sections 12-8-60 through 12-
  8-83 (1988);  (7) Georgia Safe Drinking Water Act of 1977, O.C.G.A.,
  sections 12-5-170 through 12-5-193 (1988); (8) Rules of the  Georgia
  Department of Natural Resources, Environmental  Protection Divi-
  sion, Water Quality Control, GA. COMP. R. & REGS., Chapter 391-
  3-6-.13 (Revised July 28, 1988).
Idaho:  (1) Public Writings, Title  9, Chapter 3, Idaho  Code,  §§9-  147.650(a)
  301 through 9-302 (Bobbs-Merrill 1979); (2)  Crimes and  Punish-
  ments, Title 18, Chapter 1, Idaho Code, §§18-113 through 18-
  114 (Bobbs-Merrill 1979 and Supp. 1984); (3) Department of Health
  and  Welfare, Title 39, Chapter  1, Idaho Code, Chapter  39-108
  (Bobbs-Merrill  1977); (4) Drainage-Water Rights and Reclamation,
  Title  42,  Chapter  2,  Idaho Code,  §42-237(e); §42-238  (Bobbs-
  Merrill 1977  and Supp. 1984); Department  of Water Resources-
  Water Resources Board,  Title 42, Chapter 17, Idaho Code, §§42-
  1701, 42-1703, 42-1735 (Bobbs-Merrill 1977), §42-1701A (Supp.
  1984); (6) Director of Department of Water  Resources, Title  42,
  Chapter 18, Idaho Code, §§42-1801 through 42-1805 (Bobbs-Merrill
  1977);  (7)  Waste Disposal  and Injection Wells, Title  42,  Chapter
  39, Idaho Code, §§42-3901 through 42-3914 (Bobbs-Merrill 1977),
  §§42-3915 through 42-3919 (Supp. 1984); (8) Idaho Trade Secrets
  Act,  Title 48,  Chapter 8, Idaho Code, §§48-801  through  48-807
  (Bobbs-Merrill 1977 and Supp. 1984); (9) Administrative Procedure,
  Title  67,  Chapter  52, Idaho Code,  §§67-5201 through 67-5218
  (Bobbs-Merrill 1980 and Supp.  1984); (10) Idaho Radiation  Control
  regulations (IRCR) §1-9002.70; §§1-9100 through 1-9110,  Depart-
  ment of Health and Welfare (May 1981); (11) Rules and Regulations:
  Construction and Use of Injection Wells, Idaho Department of Water
  Resources, Rules 1 through 14 (August 1984); (12) Rules and Regula-
  tions: Practice  and Procedures, Idaho  Department of Water  Re-
  sources, Rules 1 through 14 (October 1983).
                                        858

-------
             Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                               40 CFR
Illinois: (1) Illinois Environmental Protection Act, Illinois ch. 111\1/  147.700(a)
  2\, §§1001-1051 (Smith-Kurd 1977  Revised  Statutes and Supp.
  1983), as amended by Public Act No. 83-431, 1983 Illinois Legisla-
  tive Service, pages 2910-2916 (West); (2) Illinois Pollution Control
  Board Rules and Regulations at  Title 35, Illinois Administrative
  Code, Chapter I, Part 700, Outline of Waste Disposal  Regulations;
  Part  702, RCRA  and UIC Permit Programs;  Part  704, UIC Permit
  Program; Part  705, Procedures for Permit Issuance and Part 730,
  Underground Injection Control Operating Requirements as amended
  by IPCB Order No. R-83039 on December 15,1983.
Illinois: (1) Conservation of Oil and Gas, etc., Illinois Revised Statutes  147.701(a)
  ch. 96\l/2\, §§5401-5457  (Smith-Kurd  1979 and Supp.  1983),
  as amended by Public Act No. 83-1074  1983 Illinois Legislative
  Service  pages 7183-7185 (West); (2) Illinois Environmental Protec-
  tion  Act,  Illinois Revised  Statutes  ch.  lll\l/2\, §§1001-1051
  (Smith-Kurd 1977 and Supp.  1983), as  amended by Public Act
  No. 83-431, 1983 Illinois Legislative Services  pages 2910-2916
  (West);  (3)  Illinois Revised  Statutes ch.  100\l/2\, §§26 (Smith-
  Kurd Supp. 1983); (4) Illinois Department of Mines and Minerals
  Regulations for the  Oil and Gas  Division, Rules I, II, IIA,  III, V,
  VII, and IX (1981).
Indiana: (1)  Indiana Code, title 4,  article 21.5,  chapters 1 through  147.750
  6 (1988); (2) West's Annotated Indiana  Code, title 13, article 8,
  chapters 1 through 15 (1990 and Cumm. Supp. 1990); (3) Indiana
  Administrative Code, title 310, article 7, rules 1 through 3 (Cumm.
  Supp. 1991).
Kansas: (1) Kansas Administrative  Regulations,  Chapter 28, Article  147.850(a)
  46, Underground Injection Control Regulations, Kansas Administra-
  tive Regulations, sections  28-46-1 through 28-16-42 (1986  and
  Supp. 1987);  (2) Kansas Administrative  Regulations,  Chapter 28,
  Article 43, Construction, Operation, Monitoring and Abandonment
  of Salt Solution  Mining Wells, sections  28-43-1 through 28-43-
  10 (1986);  (3)  Kansas  Statutes Annotated,  sections 65-161,  65-
  164 through 65-166a,  65-171d (1980 and  Cumm.  Supp.  1989).
                                        859

-------
                      Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                                40 CFR
Louisiana: (1) Louisiana  Revised Statutes Annotated  §§ 30:1-30:24  147.950(e)
  (1975 and Supp. 1982); (2) Underground Injection Control Program
  Regulations for Class I, III, IV, and V Wells, Statewide Order No.
  29-N-l (February 20, 1982), as amended June 1, 1985, and January
  1986; (3)(i) Statewide Order Governing the  Drilling for and Pro-
  ducing of Oil and Gas  in the State of Louisiana, Statewide Order
  No.  29-B  (August  26,  1974) (Composite  Order  Incorporating
  Amendments through March  1, 1974);  (ii) Amendments to State-
  wide Order No.  29-B (Off-site Disposal of Drilling Mud and  Salt
  Water  Generated from Drilling and  Production of Oil  and  Gas
  Wells)  (effective July 20, 1980); (iii) Amendment to Statewide Order
  No. 29-B  (Amendment concerning the  use  of Tables 5A and 6A,
  etc.) (December  15,  1980,  effective January  1, 1981); (iv) Amend-
  ment  to Statewide Order  No. 29-B  (amendment concerning the
  underground injection control of saltwater disposal wells, enhanced
  recovery injection wells, and  liquid hydrocarbon storage  wells),
  (effective February 20,  1982); (v) Amendment to Statewide Order
  No. 29-B  (amendment  concerning  the  offsite disposal of drilling
  mud and  saltwater) (effective  May 20, 1983; (vi) Amendment to
  Statewide Order No. 29-B (amendment concerning disposal  of non-
  hazardous oilfields waste) (March 20, 1984, effective May 20, 1984);
  (vii) Amendment to Statewide Order No. 29-B (amendment con-
  cerning the adminstrative approval of injectivity tests and pilot
  projects in order to determine the feasibility of proposed enhanced
  recovery projects) (June 20, 1985, effective July 1, 1985).
Maine: (1) Maine Revised Statutes Annotated title 38, §§361-A, 363-  147.100
  B, 413, 414, 414-A, 420, and 1317-A (1978); (2) Rules to Control
  the Subsurface Discharge  of  Pollutants by  Well Injection, Rules
  of the Department of Environmental Protection, Chapter 543  (adopt-
  ed June 22, 1983, effective July 4, 1983).
Maryland: (1) Code of Maryland Regulations,  Title 26, Subtitle 08,  147.1050(a)
  Chapter 07, promulgated and  effective as of March 1, 1989; (2)
  Code  of Maryland Regulations, Title 26, Subtitle 08, Chapter 01,
  promulgated and effective as of March 1, 1989; (3) Code of Maryland
  Regulations, Title 26, Subtitle 08, Chapter  02, promulgated  and
  effective as of March 1, 1989; (4) Code of Maryland Regulations,
  Title 26,  Subtitle 08, Chapter 03, promulgated and effective as
  of March  1,  1989;  (5) Code  of Maryland  Regulations, Title 26,
  Subtitle 08, Chapter 04,  promulgated  and  effective as of March
  1, 1989; (6) Code of Maryland Regulations,  Title 26, Subtitle 13,
  Chapter 05, section .19, promulgated and effective  as of  August
  1, 1989; (7) Code of Maryland Regulations,  Title 26, Subtitle 01,
  Chapter 02, promulgated and  effective as of March 1, 1989; (8)
  Code  of Maryland Regulations, Title 26, Subtitle 01, Chapter 04,
  promulgated and effective as of March 1, 1989.
Massachusetts:  (1) Massachusetts General Laws Annotated  ch. 21,  147.1100(a)
  §§27, 43,  and 44 (West 1981); (2)  Code of  Massachusetts Regula-
  tions, title 310, §§23.01-23.11 as amended April 26, 1982.
                                        860

-------
            Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference
40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                               40 CFR
                                                                147.1250(a)
Mississippi: (1] Mississippi  Air  and Water Pollution Control Law,
  Mississippi Code Annotated §§49-17-1  through 49-17-29 (1972)
  and Supp. 1983); (2) Mississippi Department of Natural Resources,
  Bureau  of Pollution Control, Underground Injection Control Pro-
  gram Regulations (adopted February 11, 1982);  (3) Mississippi De-
  partment of Natural Resources, Bureau of Pollution Control, State
  of Mississippi Wastewater Permit Regulations for National Pollutant
  Discharge Elimination  System  (NPDES), Underground Injection
  Control  (UIC), and State Operating Permits (adopted May 1, 1974;
  amended February 11, 1982).
Mississippi; (1) (i)  Mississippi Code Annotated  (MCA),  Section 5-  147.1251(a)
  9-9 (Supp. 1988); (ii)  MCA, Sections  53-1-1 through 53-1-47,
  inclusive and Sections  53-1-71 through 53-1-77, inclusive (1972
  and Supp.  1988); (iii)  MCA, Sections 53-3-1  through  53-3-165,
  inclusive (1972  and Supp.  1988); (2)  State Oil and  Gas Board
  Statewide Rules and Regulations,  Rules 1 through 65, inclusive
  (Aug. 1, 1987, as amended,  Sept. 17, 1987).
Missouri:  (1)  Revised Statutes of the State of Missouri,  Volume  2,  147.1300(a)
  sections 204.016, 204.026, 204.051, 204.056 and Volume V, section
  577.155 (1978 and Cumm.  Supp. 1984); (2) Missouri Code  of State
  Regulations, Title 10,  division 50, chapters 1 and 2 (June 1984);
  (3) Vernon's Annotated Missouri  Statutes, chapter 204, sections
  204.006 through 204.470 (1983 and Cumm. Supp. 1990).
Montana: (1) Montana Statutory Requirements Applicable to  the Un-  147.1350(a)
  derground Injection Control Program, August  1996; (2) Montana
  Regulatory Requirements Applicable to the Underground Injection
  Control Program, August 1996.
Nebraska;  (1) Rules and  Regulations of the  Nebraska  Oil and Gas  147.1400(a)
  Conservation Commission,  Rules 1-6 (as published by the Commis-
  sion, May 1981); (2) Revised Statutes of Nebraska,  sections 57-
  903 and 57-906 (Reissue 1988).
Nebraska:  (1)  Revised  Statutes of Nebraska, Nebraska Environmental  147.1401(a)
  Protection Act,  sections 81-1502, 81-1506, 81-1519, and 81-1520
  (Reissue 1987);  (2) Nebraska Department of Environmental Control,
  Title 122—Rules  and Regulations  for Underground Injection and
  Mineral Production  Wells,  Effective  Date:  February   16,  1982,
  Amended Dates: November 12, 1983, March 22, 1984; as amended
  by amendment approved by the Governor on January 2,1989.
Nevada: (1) (i) Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) VOlume  25, Chapter  147.1450(a)
  445.131 through  445.354,  inclusive.  1987; (ii) NRS Volume 29,
  Chapter 534A.010 through 534A.090, inclusive.  1987; (iii) NRS
  Volume 28, Chapter 522.010 through 522.190, inclusive. 1987; (2)
  (i) Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) Underground Injection Con-
  trol Regulations, Sections 1 through 96.1, inclusive. July 22, 1987,
  revised September 3, 1987 (amending NAC Chapter 445); (ii) NAC
  Regulations and Rules of Practice and Procedure adopted pursuant
  to NRS 534A,  Sections 1  through 69,  inclusive. November 12,
  1985 (amending NAC Chapter 534A); (iii) NAC Regulations and
  Rules of Practice and Procedure adopted pursuant to NRS 522.010
  through 522.625, inclusive. July 22, 1987 (amending NAC Chapter
  522).
New Hampshire:  (1) New Hampshire  Revised  Statutes  Annotated  147.1500(a)
  § 149:8 III(a) (1978); (2) New Hampshire Code of Administrative
  Rules, Part We 410 (Protection of Groundwaters of the State, §§Ws
  410.1 through Ws 410.16) (Issue Ws 3-82).


                                        861

-------
                     Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued

New Jersey: (1) New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Water Pollution Con-
  trol Act,  sections 58:10A-1 through 58:10A-20  (West  1982  and
  Supp. 1990); (2) New Jersey Administrative Code sections 7:14A-
  1.1 through 1.9 (subchapter 1), 7:14A-2.1 through 2.15 (subchapter
  2), 7:14A-5.1  through 5.17 (subchapter 5)  (amended March 1988).
New Mexico: (1) Oil and  Gas Act, New Mexico Statutes Annotated
  §§ 70-2-1  through -36  (1978); (2)  State of New Mexico Energy
  and Mineral Department, Oil Conservation Division—Rules  and
  Regulations (dated 10-1-78), §§B-3, 1-701  through 1-708, M-1100
  through M-l 121.
New Mexico: (1) New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission
  Regulations (WQCC 82-1) §§ 1-100 through 5-300 (September 20,
  1982).
North Carolina:  (1)  Administrative Procedure Act, N.C. GEN. STAT.
  sections 150B-1 through 150B-64 (1987 and Cumm. Supp.  1989);
  (2) North Carolina Well Construction Act, N.C. GEN. STAT. sections
  87-83 through 87-99 (1989 and  Cumm. Supp. 1989);  (3)  Water
  and Air Resources, N.C.  GEN. STAT.  sections  143-211 through
  143-215.10 (1987 and Cumm. Supp. 1989); (4) Solid Waste Manage-
  ment, N.C.  GEN.  STAT.  sections  130A-290 through 130A-309.03
  (1989); (5) North Carolina Drinking Water Act, N.C. GEN. STAT.
  sections 130A-311  through 130A-332 (1989); (6)  Sanitary Sewage
  Systems, N.C. GEN. STAT. sections 130A-333 through  130A-335
  (1989).
North Dakota: (1) North Dakota Century Code, Chapter 38-08 (Control
  of Gas and Oil Resources, 1987 and Supp.  1989);  (2) North Dakota
  Administrative Code, Chapter 43-02-05 (Underground Injection
  Control, as published in Statutes  and Rules for the Conservation
  of Oil and Gas, North Dakota Industrial  Commission, revised effec-
  tive November 1, 1987);  (3) North Dakota Administrative Code,
  Chapter 43-02-03  (General Rules, as published in Statutes  and
  Rules for the Conservation of Oil and Gas, North Dakota Industrial
  Commission, revised effective November 1, 1987)..
North Dakota: (1) North Dakota  Century Code sections 38-12-01,
  39-12-03 (1980); sections 61-28-02, 61-28-06  (Supp.  1980); (2)
  North Dakota  Century  Code,  sections  61-28-02 and  61-28-06
  (1989); (3) sections  43-02-02-01,  43-02-02-12, 43-02-02-16
  through 43-02-02-26, 43-02-02-29, 43-02-02-31, 43-02-02-35
  (1978); (4) North Dakota Administrative Code, Chapter 43-02-02
  (Subsurface Mineral Mineral Exploration and Development) (August
  1986), and Chapter 43-02-02.1 (Underground Injection Control  Pro-
  gram) (March 1,1984).
Ohio:  (1) Ohio Revised  Code  Annotated,  §§1509.01,  1509.03,
  1509.221 (Supp.  1983);  (2) Rules  of the Division of Oil and  Gas,
  Ohio Administrative Code,  §§1501:9-7-01 through 7-14 (1984);
  (3) Ohio Revised Code Annotated, §§6111.04, 6111.043, 6111.044
  (Supp. 1983); (4) Rules of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agen-
  cy, Ohio Administrative Code §§ 3745-34-01, through 34-41; 3745-
  9-01 through 9-11 (Director Ohio EPA Order, June 18,1984).
Oklahoma: (1) Oklahoma  Statutes title 63 §§1-901, 1-903 (1981);
  (2) Oklahoma  Controlled Industrial Waste Disposal Act, Oklahoma
  Statute Annotated title 63 §§1-2002, 1-2014 (West Supp.  1983-
  1984).
40 CFR
 147.1550(a)
 147.1600(a)





 147.160l(a)


 147.1700(a)
 147.1750(a)
 147.1751(a).
 147.180l(a)
 147.1850(a)
                                       862

-------
             Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference
40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                               40 CFR
                                                                147.1900(a)
Oregon; (1) Oregon  Revised Statutes,  Title 16, Ch.  164, sections
  164.785;  Title 36, Ch. 468, sections 468.005,  468.065 to 468.070,
  468.700 to 468.815; (2) Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 340,
  Division  44,  sections 340-44-005 through 340-44-055 (October
  1983); Chapter 340, Division 45, sections 340-45-005 through 340-
  45-075  (January 1990);  Chapter 632,  Division 10, sections 632-
  10-002  through 632-10-235  (May 1986); Chapter 632, Division
  20, sections 632-20-005 through 632-20-180 (May 1984).
Rhode Island: (1) Rhode Island Gen. Laws §§46-12-1, 46-12-5, and   147.2000(a)
  46-12-28 (Supp. 1983); (2) "Underground Injection Control Program
  Rules and Regulations." State of Rhode Island and Providence Plan-
  tations Department of Environmental Management.  Division  of
  Water Resources (as received by the  Secretary of State, May 21,
  1984).
South  Carolina:(l) Pollution Control Act, S.C.  Code Ann §§48-1-   147.2050(a)
  10, 48-1-90,  48-1-100,  48-1-110 (Law. Co-op. 1976 and Supp.
  1983); (2) South Carolina Department  of Health and Environmental
  Control, Ground-Water Protection Division, Underground Injection
  Control Regulations, R-61-87, Effective Date: June 24, 1983.
South  Dakota:  (1) South Dakota  Codified Laws,  §§45-9-2, 45-9-   147.2100(a)
  4, 45-9-11, 45-9-13,  45-9-14,  5-9-15 (1983). (2) Administrative
  Rules of South Dakota, sections 74:10:02 through 74:10:07, 74:10:09,
  and  74:10:11  published  by the South Dakota Code Commission,
  as revised through October 4, 1987.
Texas: "Texas Statutory  and Regulatory Requirements Applicable to   147.2200
  the Underground Injection Control Program for Class I, III, IV and
  V, except Class III, Brine Mining Wells,".
Texas: "Texas Statutory  and Regulatory Requirements Applicable to   147.2200
  the Underground Injection Control Program for Class III Brine Min-
  ing Wells,".
Utah: (1) Utah  Code Annotated,  Utah Water Pollution Control Act,   147.2250(a)
  Title 26, Chapter 11, Sections 2, 8. and 10 (1989); (2) Utah Adminis-
  trative Code,  Underground Injection  Control  Regulations, section
  R448-7 (effective as of January 2, 1990); (3) Underground Injection
  Control Program (adopted January  20, 1990 and revised effective
  July  20, 1990) (officially submitted to EPA by the Executive Sec-
  retary of Utah Water Pollution Control Committee  on August 16,
  1990).
Utah: (1) Utah  Code Annotated, 1953,  section 40-6-1 through 40-   147.2251(a)
  6-18, as  amended 1988  and Cumm. Supp. 1990; (2) The Oil and
  Gas Conservation General Rules, adopted  under the  authority of
  the Oil and Gas Conservation Act, 40-6-1 et seq, Utah Code Anno-
  tated, as amended 1988 (revised March 1989), rules R615-1 through
  R615^, and R615-8 through R615-10.
Vermont: (1) Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, sections 1251,  1259, 1263  (1973   147.2300(a)
  and Supp. 1981), Effective date: July 1, 1982;  (2) Vermont Depart-
  ment of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Chapter
  13 Water Pollution Control Regulations, Subchapter 13.UIC—Under-
  ground Injection Control, Discharges  to  Injection Wells, Effective
  Date: June 21, 1984.
                                        863

-------
                      Title 40—Protection of Environment

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued

Washington: (1)  Revised Code of Washington §§90.48.020,  -.080,
  -.160, and -.162 (Bureau of National Affairs, 1983 Laws]; (2)  Wash-
  ington  Administrative Code §§173-218-010 to 173-218-110 (Bu-
  reau of National Affairs 2/29/84); (3) Washington  Administrative
  Code §§344-12-001  to  344-12-262 (Bureau of National Affairs,
  1983);  (4)  Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173-160 (re-
  printed May 1988).
Wisconsin:   (1)  Wisconsin Statutes Annotated,  sections 147.015,
  147.02  and 147.04 (West  1974 and Supp.  1983); (2)  Wisconsin
  Administrative Code,  Chapter NR 112, Well Construction and Pump
  Installation, sections  NR 112.03 and  112.20  (October 1981), as
  amended by Natural  Resources Board  Order No. WQ-25-82, ap-
  proved by the Natural Resources Board on August 25, 1982;  (3)
  Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter NR 113, Servicing  Septic
  Tanks,  Seepage Pits,  Grease Traps or Privies, sections NR 113.07
  through 113.08 (1979), as amended by Natural Resources  Board
  Order No. WQ-25-82, approved  by  the Natural Resources  Board
  on August 25, 1982;  (4) Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter
  NR 181, Hazardous Waste Management, sections NR 181.04 through
  181.415 (1981), as amended June 1985;  (5) Wisconsin Administra-
  tive Code, Chapter NR 210, Sewage Treatment Works, Natural Re-
  sources Board Order No. WQ-25-82, section NR 210.05, approved
  by the  Natural Resources Board on August 25, 1982; (6) Wisconsin
  Administrative Code, Chapter NR 214,  Land Application and Dis-
  posal  of Liquid Industrial Wastes and By-products, sections NR
  214.03  and 214.08 (1983).
Wyoming: (1) Wyoming Environmental Quality Act,  Wyoming Stat-
  utes, sections 35-11-101  through  35-11-115, and 35-11-301
  through 35-11-305 (1977  Republished  Edition and  1989 Cumm.
  Supp.); (2) Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Wyoming Depart-
  ment of Environmental Quality, Chapter III: Regulations for Permit
  to Construct,  Install  or Modify Public Facilities Capable  or, (sic)
  Causing or Contributing to Pollution (certified copy, signed Decem-
  ber 21, 1983); (3) Water Quality Rules  and Regulations, Wyoming
  Department of Environmental Quality, Chapter VIII: Quality  Stand-
  ards for Groundwaters of Wyoming (certified copy,  signed April
  9, 1980); (4) Water Quality Rules and Regulations, Wyoming Depart-
  ment of Environmental Quality, Chapter IX: Wyoming Groundwater
  Pollution  Control Permit (certified copy, signed April 9,  1980);
  (5) Water  Quality Rules and Regulations,  Wyoming Department
  of Environmental Quality, Chapter XIII: Prohibitions of Permits
  for New Hazardous Waste Injection  Wells  (certified  copy, signed
  August 25, 1989); (6) Land Quality Rules and Regulations, Wyoming
  Department of Environmental Quality, Chapter XXI: In Situ Mining
  (effective March 26, 1981).
Wyoming: (1) Rules and Regulations of  the Wyoming Oil and Gas
  Conservation Commission, including Rules  of Practice and  Proce-
  dure, as  published by the Wyoming  Oil  and Gas  Conservation
  Commission, August 7, 1990; (2) Wyoming Statutes, Title 30, Chap-
  ter 5, sections 30-5-101 through 30-5-126,  (June 1983 and Wyo-
  ming Statutes Annotated, 1990 Supp).
40 CFR
 147.2400(a)
 147.2500(a)
 147.2550(a)
 147.2551(a)
                                        864

-------
            Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference

40 CFR (PARTS 136 TO 149)—Continued
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY—Continued
                                                             40 CFR
Guam: (1) Water Resources Conservation  Act, Government Code of  147.2600(a)
  Guam §§57021-57025, Pub. L. 9-31 (March 9, 1967), as amended
  by Pub. L. 9-76 (July  29, 1967), as amended by Pub. L.  12-191
  (December 30, 1974); (2) Water Pollution Control Act, Government
  Code of Guam §§57042 and 57045,  Pub. L. 9-76 (July 29, 1967),
  as  amended by Pub. L. 9-212 (August 5, 1968), as amended by
  Pub. L.  10-31 (March  10, 1969), as amended by Pub. L.  12-191
  (December 30, 1974); (3) Guam Environmental Protection Agency,
  Underground Injection Control Regulations, Chapters 1-9, as re-
  vised by amendments adopted September 24, 1982; (4) Guam Envi-
  ronmental Protection  Agency, Water Quality Standards,  Section
  I-IV (approved September 25, 1981,  effective November 16, 1981).
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: (1) CNMI Environ-  147.2800(a)
  mental Protection Act, 2 CMC sections 3101, et seq. (1984); (2)
  CNMI Coastal Resources Management Act,  2 CMC  sections 1501,
  et  seq. (1984);  (3) CNMI Drinking Water Regulations,  Common-
  wealth Register, Volume 4, Number 4 (August 15, 1982); (4) CNMI
  Underground Injection Control Regulations, Commonwealth Reg-
  ister, Volume 8, Number  5  (May 15, 1984, amended November
  15,  1984, January 15,  1985);  (5) CNMI Coastal Resources Manage-
  ment Regulations, Commonwealth Register, Volume  6, Number 12,
  December 17,1984.
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico: (1)  Underground Injection  Control  147.2650
  Regulations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Parts I through
  V and appendices A and B, adopted September 14, 1983 (Amended
  July 20, 1988); (2) Puerto Rico Public Policy Environmental Act
  (PRPPE), Title 12 Laws of Puerto Rico Annotated (LPRA) Chapters
  121 and 131, 1977 edition, as amended  1988 edition, and Chapter
  122, 1988 edition.
  Copies of these materials are available at the addreses provided  in the regulations cited
  in this table
                                      865

-------

-------
           Table of CFR Titles and Chapters
                    (Revised as of July 1, 2004)

                  Title 1—General Provisions

       I   Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (Parts 1—49)
      II   Office of the Federal Register (Parts 50—299)
     IV   Miscellaneous Agencies (Parts 400—500)

               Title 2—Grants and Agreements

          SUBTITLE A—OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GUIDANCE FOR
            GRANTS AND AGREEMENTS
       I   [Reserved]
      II   Office of Management and Budget Circulars and Guidance [Re-
            served]
          SUBTITLE B—FEDERAL  AGENCY REGULATIONS FOR  GRANTS AND
            AGREEMENTS [RESERVED]
                    Title 3—The President

      I   Executive Office of the President (Parts 100—199)

                      Title 4—Accounts

      I   General Accounting Office (Parts 1—99)

              Title 5—Administrative Personnel

      I   Office of Personnel Management (Parts 1—1199)
      II   Merit Systems Protection Board (Parts 1200—1299)
     III   Office of Management and Budget (Parts 1300—1399)
      V   The International  Organizations  Employees Loyalty  Board
            (Parts 1500—1599)
     VI   Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (Parts 1600—1699)
   VIII   Office of Special Counsel (Parts 1800—1899)
     IX   Appalachian Regional Commission (Parts 1900—1999)
     XI   Armed Forces Retirement Home (Part 2100)
   XIV   Federal Labor Relations Authority, General Counsel of the Fed-
            eral Labor Relations  Authority and Federal Service Impasses
            Panel (Parts 2400—2499)

                             867
203-160 D-29

-------
       Title 5—Administrative Personnel—Continued
   Chap.
    XV   Office of  Administration, Executive  Office of the President
           (Parts 2500—2599)
   XVI   Office of Government Ethics (Parts 2600—2699)
   XXI   Department of the Treasury (Parts 3100—3199)
  XXII   Federal  Deposit Insurance Corporation (Part 3201)
 XXIII   Department of Energy (Part 3301)
 XXIV   Federal  Energy Regulatory Commission (Part 3401)
  XXV   Department of the Interior (Part 3501)
 XXVI   Department of Defense (Part 3601)
XXVIII   Department of Justice (Part 3801)
 XXIX   Federal  Communications Commission (Parts 3900—3999)
  XXX   Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (Parts 4000—4099)
 XXXI   Farm Credit Administration (Parts 4100—4199)
XXXIII   Overseas Private Investment Corporation (Part 4301)
 XXXV   Office of Personnel Management (Part 4501)
    XL   Interstate Commerce Commission (Part 5001)
   XLI   Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Part 5101)
  XLII   Department of Labor (Part 5201)
 XLIII   National Science Foundation (Part 5301)
  XLV   Department of Health and Human Services (Part 5501)
 XLVI   Postal Rate Commission (Part 5601)
 XLVII   Federal  Trade Commission (Part 5701)
XLVIII   Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Part 5801)
     L   Department of Transportation (Part 6001)
    LII   Export-Import Bank of the United States (Part 6201)
   LIII   Department of Education (Parts 6300—6399)
   LIV   Environmental Protection Agency (Part 6401)
    LV   National Endowment for the Arts (Part 6501)
   LVI   National Endowment for the Humanities (Part 6601)
  LVII   General Services Administration (Part 6701)
 LVIII   Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Part 6801)
   LIX   National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Part 6901)
    LX   United States Postal Service (Part 7001)
   LXI   National Labor Relations Board (Part 7101)
  LXII   Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Part 7201)
 LXIII   Inter-American Foundation (Part 7301)
  LXV   Department of Housing and Urban Development (Part 7501)
 LXVI   National Archives and Records Administration (Part 7601)
 LXVII   Institute of Museum and Library Services (Part 7701)
 LXIX   Tennessee Valley Authority (Part 7901)
 LXXI   Consumer Product Safety Commission (Part 8101)
LXXIII   Department of Agriculture (Part 8301)
LXXIV   Federal Mine Safety and Health Review  Commission (Part 8401)

-------
        Title 5—Administrative Personnel—Continued
   Chap.

 LXXVI   Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board (Part 8601)
LXXVTI   Office of Management and Budget (Part 8701)

                 Title 6—Homeland Security

      I   Department  of  Homeland Security,  Office  of  the Secretary
            (Parts 0—99)

                      Title 7—Agriculture

          SUBTITLE A—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE (PARTS
            0—26)
          SUBTITLE B—REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
      I   Agricultural  Marketing  Service (Standards,  Inspections,  Mar-
            keting Practices), Department of Agriculture (Parts 27—209)
     II   Food and Nutrition Service,  Department of Agriculture (Parts
            210—299)
     III   Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Ag-
            riculture (Parts 300—399)
     IV   Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, Department of Agriculture
            (Parts 400—499)
     V   Agricultural   Research  Service, Department  of  Agriculture
            (Parts 500—599)
     VI   Natural Resources  Conservation Service, Department, of Agri-
            culture (Parts 600—699)
    VII   Farm Service Agency, Department of Agriculture (Parts  700—
            799)
   VIII   Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (Fed-
            eral Grain  Inspection Service), Department of  Agriculture
            (Parts 800—899)
     IX   Agricultural Marketing Service (Marketing Agreements and Or-
            ders;  Fruits, Vegetables, Nuts), Department of  Agriculture
            (Parts 900—999)
     X   Agricultural Marketing Service (Marketing Agreements and Or-
            ders; Milk), Department of Agriculture (Parts 1000—1199)
     XI   Agricultural Marketing Service (Marketing Agreements and Or-
            ders; Miscellaneous Commodities), Department of Agriculture
            (Parts 1200—1299)
   XIV   Commodity  Credit Corporation, Department  of  Agriculture
            (Parts 1400—1499)
    XV   Foreign Agricultural Service, Department of Agriculture (Parts
            1500—1599)
   XVI   Rural Telephone Bank, Department of Agriculture (Parts 1600—
            1699)
  XVII   Rural Utilities Service, Department of Agriculture (Parts 1700—
            1799)
  XVIII   Rural  Housing  Service,  Rural  Business-Cooperative  Service,
            Rural  Utilities Service,  and Farm  Service Agency, Depart-
            ment of Agriculture (Parts 1800—2099)
    XX   Local Television Loan Guarantee Board (Parts 2200—2299)

                             869

-------
                Title 7—Agriculture—Continued
    Chap

   XXVI  Office of Inspector General, Department of Agriculture (Parts
            2600—2699)
  XXVII  Office of  Information  Resources  Management, Department of
            Agriculture (Parts 2700—2799)
 XXVIII  Office of  Operations, Department of Agriculture (Parts 2800—
            2899)
   XXIX  Office of Energy, Department of Agriculture (Parts 2900—2999)
    XXX  Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Department of Agriculture
            (Parts 3000—3099)
   XXXI  Office of  Environmental  Quality, Department of Agriculture
            (Parts 3100—3199)
  XXXII  Office of Procurement and Property Management, Department
            of Agriculture (Parts 3200—3299)
 XXXIII  Office of  Transportation,  Department of Agriculture (Parts
            3300—3399)
 XXXIV  Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service,
            Department of Agriculture (Parts 3400—3499)
  XXXV  Rural Housing Service, Department of Agriculture (Parts 3500—
            3599)
 XXXVI  National Agricultural  Statistics  Service,  Department  of Agri-
            culture  (Parts 3600—3699)
 XXXVII  Economic Research Service, Department of Agriculture (Parts
            3700—3799)
XXXVIII  World Agricultural Outlook Board, Department of Agriculture
            (Parts 3800—3899)
    XLI  [Reserved]
    XLII  Rural Business-Cooperative Service and Rural Utilities Service,
            Department of Agriculture (Parts 4200—4299)

                 Title 8—Aliens and Nationality

       I  Department of Homeland Security (Immigration and Naturaliza-
            tion) (Parts 1^99)
      V  Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice
            (Parts 1000—1399)

             Title 9—Animals and Animal Products

       I  Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Department of Ag-
            riculture (Parts 1—199)
      II  Grain Inspection,  Packers  and  Stockyards  Administration
            (Packers and Stockyards Programs), Department of Agri-
            culture (Parts 200—299)
      III  Food Safety and Inspection  Service, Department of Agriculture
            (Parts 300—599)

                        Title 10—Energy

       I  Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Parts 0—199)
      II  Department of Energy  (Parts 200—699)

                              870

-------
               Title 10—Energy—Continued
  Chap.
   Ill   Department of Energy (Parts 700—999)
    X   Department of Energy (General Provisions) (Parts 1000—1099)
 XVII   Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Parts 1700—1799)
XVIII   Northeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission
          (Part 1800)

                Title 11—Federal Elections

    I   Federal Election Commission (Parts 1—9099)

               Title 12—Banks and Banking

    I   Comptroller of the Currency, Department of the Treasury (Parts
          1—199)
    II   Federal Reserve System (Parts 200—299)
   III   Federal Deposit  Insurance Corporation (Parts 300—399)
   IV   Export-Import Bank of the United States (Parts 400—499)
    V   Office of Thrift Supervision, Department of the Treasury (Parts
          500—599)
   VI   Farm Credit Administration (Parts 600—699)
  VII   National Credit Union Administration (Parts 700—799)
  VIII   Federal Financing Bank (Parts 800—899)
   IX   Federal Housing Finance Board (Parts 900—999)
   XI   Federal Financial  Institutions  Examination Council  (Parts
          1100—1199)
  XIV   Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (Parts 1400—1499)
  XV   Department of the Treasury (Parts 1500—1599)
 XVII   Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, Department of
          Housing and Urban Development (Parts 1700—1799)
XVIII   Community Development  Financial Institutions Fund, Depart-
          ment of the Treasury (Parts 1800—1899)

         Title 13—Business Credit and  Assistance

    I   Small Business Administration (Parts 1—199)
   III   Economic Development Administration,  Department  of  Com-
          merce (Parts 300—399)
   IV   Emergency  Steel Guarantee Loan Board, Department of Com-
          merce (Parts 400—499)
    V   Emergency Oil and  Gas Guaranteed Loan Board, Department of
          Commerce (Parts 500—599)

             Title 14—Aeronautics and Space

    I   Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation
          (Parts 1—199)
    II   Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation (Aviation
          Proceedings) (Parts 200—399)

                           871

-------
      Title 14—Aeronautics and Space—Continued
 Chap.

   Ill  Commercial Space Transportation, Federal Aviation Adminis-
          tration, Department of Transportation (Parts 400—499)
    V  National Aeronautics  and Space Administration (Parts 1200—
          1299)
   VI  Air Transportation System Stabilization (Parts 1300—1399)


         Title 15—Commerce and Foreign Trade


       SUBTITLE A—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE (PARTS 0—
          29)
       SUBTITLE B—REGULATIONS RELATING TO COMMERCE AND FOREIGN
          TRADE
    I  Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce (Parts 30—199)
    II  National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of
          Commerce (Parts 200—299)
   III  International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce
          (Parts 300—399)
   IV  Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Department of Commerce (Parts
          400--199)
  VII  Bureau  of Industry and  Security, Department  of Commerce
          (Parts 700—799)
 VIII  Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce (Parts
          800—899)
   IX  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,  Department
          of Commerce (Parts 900—999)
   XI  Technology Administration, Department of Commerce (Parts
          1100—1199)
 XIII  East-West Foreign Trade Board (Parts 1300—1399)
 XIV  Minority Business Development Agency (Parts 1400—1499)
       SUBTITLE C—REGULATIONS  RELATING TO  FOREIGN TRADE AGREE-
          MENTS
  XX  Office of the  United States Trade Representative (Parts 2000—
          2099)
       SUBTITLE  D—REGULATIONS  RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS
          AND INFORMATION
XXIII  National Telecommunications and Information Administration,
          Department of Commerce (Parts 2300—2399)


            Title 16—Commercial Practices


    I  Federal Trade Commission (Parts 0—999)
    II  Consumer Product Safety Commission (Parts 1000—1799)


     Title 17—Commodity and Securities Exchanges


    I  Commodity Futures Trading Commission (Parts 1—199)
    II  Securities and Exchange Commission (Parts 200—399)
   IV  Department of the Treasury (Parts 400—499)

                           872

-------
Title 18—Conservation of Power and Water Resources
Chap
   I  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy
        (Parts 1—399)
 III  Delaware River Basin Commission (Parts 400—499)
 VI  Water Resources Council (Parts 700—799)
VIII  Susquehanna River Basin Commission (Parts 800—899)
XIII  Tennessee Valley Authority (Parts 1300—1399)

               Title 19—Customs Duties

   I  Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Home-
        land Security; Department of the Treasury (Parts 0—199)
  II  United States International Trade Commission (Parts 200—299)
 III  International Trade Administration, Department  of Commerce
        (Parts 300—399)
 IV  Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department
        of Homeland Security (Parts 400—599)

             Title 20—Employees' Benefits

   I  Office  of  Workers'  Compensation  Programs, Department of
        Labor (Parts 1—199)
  II  Railroad Retirement Board (Parts 200—399)
 III  Social Security Administration  (Parts 400—499)
 IV  Employees  Compensation Appeals Board, Department of Labor
        (Parts 500—599)
  V  Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor
        (Parts 600—699)
 VI  Employment Standards  Administration,  Department of Labor
        (Parts 700—799)
VII  Benefits Review Board, Department of Labor (Parts 800—899)
VIII  Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries (Parts 900—999)
 IX  Office of the Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment and
        Training, Department of Labor (Parts 1000—1099)

               Title 21—Food and Drugs

   I  Pood  and  Drug Administration, Department of Health and
        Human Services (Parts 1—1299)
  II  Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice (Parts
        1300—1399)
 III  Office of National Drug Control Policy (Parts 1400—1499)

              Title 22—Foreign Relations

   I  Department of State (Parts 1—199)
  II  Agency for International Development (Parts 200—299)
 III  Peace Corps (Parts 300—399)

                         873

-------
         Title 22—Foreign Relations—Continued
 Chap

  IV   International Joint Commission,  United States and  Canada
         (Parts 400—499)
   V   Broadcasting Board of Governors (Parts 500—599)
 VII   Overseas Private Investment Corporation (Parts 700—799)
  IX   Foreign Service Grievance Board Regulations (Parts 900—999)
   X   Inter-American Foundation (Parts 1000—1099)
  XI   International Boundary and Water Commission,  United States
         and Mexico, United States Section (Parts 1100—1199)
 XII   United  States  International Development Cooperation  Agency
         (Parts 1200—1299)
 XIV   Foreign Service Labor Relations Board; Federal Labor Relations
         Authority; General Counsel of the Federal Labor Relations
         Authority; and the Foreign Service Impasse Disputes Panel
         (Parts 1400—1499)
 XV   African Development Foundation (Parts 1500—1599)
 XVI   Japan-United States Friendship Commission (Parts 1600—1699)
XVII   United States Institute of Peace (Parts 1700—1799)


                   Title 23—Highways

    I   Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation
         (Parts 1—999)
   II   National  Highway Traffic Safety Administration and  Federal
         Highway  Administration,  Department  of  Transportation
         (Parts 1200—1299)
  III   National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
         Transportation (Parts 1300—1399)

       Title 24—Housing and Urban Development

       SUBTITLE A—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
         AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (PARTS 0—99)
       SUBTITLE B—REGULATIONS RELATING TO HOUSING AND URBAN DE-
         VELOPMENT
    I   Office of Assistant Secretary for Equal Opportunity, Department
         of Housing and Urban Development (Parts 100—199)
   II   Office of Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Com-
         missioner, Department of Housing and Urban Development
         (Parts 200—299)
  III   Government  National Mortgage Association, Department  of
         Housing and Urban Development (Parts 300—399)
  IV   Office of Housing and Office of Multifamily Housing Assistance
         Restructuring, Department  of Housing and Urban Develop-
         ment (Parts 400—499)
   V   Office of Assistant Secretary for Community Planning  and De-
         velopment, Department of Housing and Urban Development
         (Parts 500—599)
  VI   Office of Assistant Secretary for Community Planning  and De-
         velopment, Department of Housing and Urban Development
         (Parts 600—699) [Reserved]

                          874

-------
Title 24—Housing and Urban Development—Continued
Chap

 VII   Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Devel-
         opment (Housing Assistance Programs and Public and Indian
         Housing Programs) (Parts 700—799)
VIII   Office of  the Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
         Commissioner, Department of Housing and  Urban Develop-
         ment (Section 8 Housing Assistance Programs, Section 202 Di-
         rect Loan Program, Section 202 Supportive Housing for the El-
         derly Program and Section 811 Supportive Housing for Persons
         With Disabilities Program) (Parts 800—899)
  IX   Office of Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing, De-
         partment of Housing and Urban Development  (Parts 900—1699)
   X   Office of Assistant  Secretary  for Housing—Federal  Housing
         Commissioner, Department of Housing and  Urban Develop-
         ment  (Interstate  Land Sales Registration Program) (Parts
         1700—1799)
 XII   Office of  Inspector General, Department of Housing and Urban
         Development (Parts 2000—2099)
 XX   Office of Assistant  Secretary  for Housing—Federal  Housing
         Commissioner, Department of Housing and  Urban Develop-
         ment (Parts 3200—3899)
XXV   Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (Parts 4100—4199)


                    Title 25—Indians


    I   Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior (Parts 1—
         299)
   II   Indian Arts and Crafts Board, Department of the Interior (Parts
         300—399)
  III   National  Indian Gaming Commission, Department of the Inte-
         rior (Parts 500—599)
  IV   Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Parts 700—799)
   V   Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department oi  the Interior, and Indian
         Health Service, Department  of Health and Human  Services
         (Part 900)
  VI   Office of the Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Department of
         the Interior (Parts 1000—1199)
 VII   Office of the  Special Trustee for American Indians, Department
         of the Interior (Part 1200)


               Title 26—Internal Revenue


    I   Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury (Parts 1—
         899)


   Title 27—Alcohol, Tobacco Products and Firearms


    I   Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Department of the
         Treasury (Parts 1—399)
   II   Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Depart-
         ment of Justice (Parts 400—699)

                           875

-------
             Title 26—Judicial Administration
  Chap
     I   Department of Justice (Parts 0—299)
   III   Federal Prison Industries, Inc., Department of Justice (Parts
          300—399)
    V   Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice (Parts 500—599)
   VI   Offices of Independent Counsel, Department of Justice (Parts
          600—699)
   VII   Office of Independent Counsel (Parts 700—799)
  VIII   Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District
          of Columbia (Parts 800—899)
   IX   National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Council (Parts
          900—999)
   XI   Department of Justice and Department of State  (Parts  1100—
          1199)

                      Title 29—Labor

        SUBTITLE A—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF LABOR (PARTS 0—99)
        SUBTITLE B—REGULATIONS RELATING TO LABOR
     I   National Labor Relations Board (Parts 100—199)
    II   Office  of Labor-Management Standards, Department of  Labor
          (Parts 200—299)
   in   National Railroad Adjustment Board (Parts 300—399)
   IV   Office  of Labor-Management Standards, Department of  Labor
          (Parts 400—499)
    V   Wage and Hour Division, Department of Labor (Parts 500—899)
   IX   Construction Industry Collective Bargaining Commission (Parts
          900—999)
    X   National Mediation Board (Parts 1200—1299)
   XII   Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (Parts 1400—1499)
  XIV   Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Parts 1600—1699)
 XVII   Occupational Safety and Health. Administration, Department of
          Labor (Parts 1900—1999)
   XX   Occupational  Safety  and Health Review Commission  (Parts
          2200—2499)
 XXV   Employee  Benefits Security  Administration,  Department of
          Labor (Parts 2500—2599)
XXVII   Federal Mine  Safety and Health Review Commission  (Parts
          2700—2799)
   XL   Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (Parts 4000—4999)

                Title 30—Mineral Resources

     I   Mine  Safety and Health Administration,  Department of Labor
          (Parts 1—199)
    II   Minerals Management  Service,  Department  of  the  Interior
          (Parts 200—299)
   III   Board  of Surface Mining and Reclamation Appeals, Department
          of the Interior (Parts 300—399)

                            876

-------
          Title 30—Mineral Resources—Continued
   Chap.
    IV   Geological Survey, Department of the Interior (Parts 400—499)
    VII   Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Depart-
           ment of the Interior (Parts 700—999)

           Title 31—Money and Finance: Treasury

         SUBTITLE A—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY (PARTS
           0—50)
         SUBTITLE B—REGULATIONS RELATING TO MONEY AND FINANCE
      I   Monetary Offices, Department of the Treasury (Parts 51—199)
     II   Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury (Parts 200—399)
    IV   Secret Service, Department of the Treasury (Parts 400—499)
     V   Office of Foreign Assets Control, Department of  the Treasury
           (Parts 500—599)
    VI   Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Department of the Treasury
           (Parts 600—699)
    VII   Federal Law Enforcement Training Center,  Department of the
           Treasury (Parts 700—799)
   VIII   Office of International Investment, Department of the Treasury
           (Parts 800—899)
    IX   Federal Claims Collection Standards (Department of the Treas-
           ury—Department of Justice) (Parts 900—999)

                 Title 32—National Defense

         SUBTITLE A—DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
      I   Office of the Secretary of Defense (Parts 1—399)
     V   Department of the Army (Parts 400—699)
    VI   Department of the Navy (Parts 700—799)
    VII   Department of the Air Force (Parts 800—1099)
         SUBTITLE B—OTHER REGULATIONS  RELATING TO NATIONAL  DE-
           FENSE
    XII   Defense Logistics Agency (Parts 1200—1299)
   XVI   Selective Service System (Parts 1600—1699)
 XVIII   National Counter-intelligence Center (Parts 1800—1899)
   XIX   Central Intelligence Agency (Parts 1900—1999)
    XX   Information Security Oversight Office,  National Archives  and
           Records Administration (Parts 2000—2099)
   XXI   National Security Council (Parts 2100—2199)
 XXIV   Office of Science and Technology Policy (Parts 2400—2499)
 XXVII   Office for Micronesian Status Negotiations (Parts 2700—2799)
XXVIII   Office of the Vice President of the United States (Parts 2800—
           2899)

        Title 33—Navigation and Navigable Waters

      I   Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (Parts 1—199)
     II   Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army (Parts 200—399)

                            877

-------
Title 33—Navigation and Navigable Waters—Continued
 Chap.
  IV   Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, Department
         of Transportation (Parts 400—499)

                   Title 34—Education

       SUBTITLE A—OFFICE OF THE  SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDU-
         CATION (PARTS 1—99)
       SUBTITLE B—REGULATIONS OF THE OFFICES OF THE DEPARTMENT
         OF EDUCATION
    I   Office for Civil Rights, Department of Education (Parts 100—199)
   II   Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
         Education (Parts 200—299)
  III   Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Depart-
         ment of Education (Parts 300—399)
  IV   Office of Vocational and Adult Education, Department of Edu-
         cation (Parts 400—499)
   V   Office of Bilingual Education and Minority  Languages Affairs,
         Department of Education (Parts 500—599)
  VI   Office of Postsecondary Education,  Department  of Education
         (Parts 600—699)
  XI   National Institute for Literacy (Parts 1100—1199)
       SUBTITLE C—REGULATIONS RELATING TO EDUCATION
 XII   National Council on Disability (Parts 1200—1299)

                Title 35—Panama Canal

    I   Panama Canal Regulations (Parts 1—299)

      Title 36—Parks, Forests, and Public Property

    I   National Park Service, Department of the Interior (Parts 1—199)
   II   Forest Service, Department of Agriculture (Parts 200—299)
  III   Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army (Parts 300—399)
  IV   American Battle Monuments  Commission (Parts 400—499)
   V   Smithsonian Institution (Parts 500—599)
 VII   Library  of Congress (Parts 700—799)
 VIII   Advisory Council on Historic  Preservation (Parts 800—899)
  IX   Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation (Parts 900—999)
   X   Presidio Trust (Parts 1000—1099)
  XI   Architectural and  Transportation Barriers  Compliance Board
         (Parts 1100—1199)
 XII   National Archives and Records Administration (Parts 1200—1299)
 XV   Oklahoma City National Memorial Trust (Part 1501)
 XVI   Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environ-
         mental Policy Foundation (Parts 1600—1699)
                           878

-------
    Title 37—Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights
Chap.
   I  United States Patent and Trademark Office,  Department  of
        Commerce (Parts 1—199)
  II  Copyright Office, Library of Congress (Parts 200—299)
 IV  Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, Department of Com-
        merce (Parts 400-^99)
  V  Under  Secretary  for  Technology, Department of Commerce
        (Parts 500—599)

   Title 38—Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief

   I  Department of Veterans Affairs (Parts 0—99)

                Title 39—Postal Service

   I  United States Postal Service (Parts 1—999)
 III  Postal Rate Commission (Parts 3000—3099)

          Title 40—Protection of Environment

   I  Environmental Protection Agency (Parts 1—1099)
 IV  Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Justice
        (Parts 1400—1499)
  V  Council on Environmental Quality (Parts 1500—1599)
 VI  Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (Parts 1600—
        1699)
 VII  Environmental Protection  Agency and Department of Defense;
        Uniform  National  Discharge Standards  for  Vessels of the
        Armed Forces (Parts 1700—1799)

 Title 41—Public  Contracts and Property Management

      SUBTITLE B—OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS
  50  Public Contracts, Department of Labor (Parts 50-1—50-999)
  51  Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely
        Disabled (Parts 51-1—51-99)
  60  Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employ-
        ment Opportunity, Department of Labor (Parts 60-1—60-999)
  61  Office of the Assistant Secretary for Veterans' Employment and
        Training Service, Department of Labor (Parts 61-1—61-999)
      SUBTITLE C—FEDERAL PROPERTY  MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS
        SYSTEM
 101  Federal Property Management Regulations (Parts 101-1—101-99)
 102  Federal Management Regulation (Parts 102-1—102-299)
 105  General Services Administration (Parts 105-1—105-999)
 109  Department of Energy Property Management Regulations (Parts
        109-1—109-99)
 114  Department of the Interior  (Parts 114-1—114-99)
 115  Environmental Protection Agency (Parts 115-1—115-99)

                          879

-------
Title 41—Public Contracts and Property Management—Continued
      Chap
       128   Department of Justice (Parts 128-1—128-99)
            SUBTITLE D—OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO PROPERTY MANAGE-
              MENT [RESERVED]
            SUBTITLE  E—FEDERAL  INFORMATION RESOURCES  MANAGEMENT
              REGULATIONS SYSTEM
       201   Federal Information Resources Management Regulation (Parts
              201-1—201-99) [Reserved]
            SUBTITLE F—FEDERAL TRAVEL REGULATION SYSTEM
       300   General (Parts 300-1—300-99)
       301   Temporary Duty (TDY) Travel Allowances (Parts 301-1—301-99)
       302   Relocation Allowances (Parts 302-1—302-99)
       303   Payment of Expenses Connected with the Death of Certain Em-
              ployees (Part 303-70)
       304   Payment of Travel Expenses from a Non-Federal Source (Parts
              304-1—304-99)

                      Title 42—Public Health

         I   Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Serv-
              ices (Parts  1—199)
       IV   Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health
              and Human Services (Parts 400—499)
        V   Office of Inspector General-Health Care, Department of Health
              and Human Services (Parts 1000—1999)

                  Title 43—Public Lands: Interior

            SUBTITLE A—OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY  OF THE INTERIOR (PARTS
              1—199)
            SUBTITLE B—REGULATIONS RELATING TO PUBLIC LANDS
         I   Bureau of Reclamation, Department of  the Interior (Parts 200—
              499)
        II   Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior (Parts
              1000—9999)
       III   Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation  Commission
              (Parts 10000—10010)

        Title 44—Emergency Management and Assistance

         I   Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Home-
              land Security (Parts 0—399)
       IV   Department  of Commerce and Department of Transportation
              (Parts 400-^99)

                     Title 45—Public Welfare

            SUBTITLE  A—DEPARTMENT  OF  HEALTH  AND HUMAN  SERVICES
              (PARTS 1—199)
            SUBTITLE B—REGULATIONS RELATING TO PUBLIC WELFARE

                               880

-------
           Title 45—Public Welfare—Continued
 Chap.
    II   Office of Family Assistance (Assistance Programs), Administra-
          tion for Children and Families,  Department of Health and
          Human Services (Parts 200—299)
   III   Office of  Child Support Enforcement (Child Support Enforce-
          ment Program),  Administration  for Children and Families,
          Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 300—399)
   IV   Office of Refugee Resettlement, Administration for Children and
          Families, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts
          400—499)
    V   Foreign Claims Settlement Commission  of  the United States,
          Department of Justice (Parts 500—599)
   VI   National Science Foundation (Parts 600—699)
  VU   Commission on Civil Rights (Parts 700—799)
 VHI   Office of Personnel Management (Parts 800—899)
    X   Office of Community Services, Administration for Children and
          Families, Department of Health and Human Services (Parts
          1000—1099)
   XI   National  Foundation on the Arts and the  Humanities (Parts
          1100—1199)
  XII   Corporation for National and Community Service (Parts 1200—
          1299)
 XIII   Office of  Human  Development Services, Department of Health
          and Human Services (Parts 1300--1399)
 XVI   Legal Services Corporation (Parts 1600—1699)
 XVII   National  Commission  on  Libraries and Information  Science
          (Parts 1700—1799)
XVIII   Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation (Parts 1800—1899)
 XXI   Commission on Fine Arts (Parts 2100—2199)
XXIII   Arctic Research Commission (Part 2301)
XXIV   James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation (Parts 2400—
          2499)
 XXV   Corporation for National and Community Service (Parts 2500—
          2599)

                    Title 46—Shipping

    I   Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (Parts 1—199)
    II   Maritime  Administration, Department of Transportation (Parts
          200—399)
   III   Coast Guard (Great Lakes Pilotage), Department of Homeland
          Security (Parts 400—499)
   IV   Federal Maritime Commission (Parts 500—599)

               Title 47—Telecommunication

    I   Federal Communications Commission (Parts 0—199)
    II   Office of Science  and Technology Policy and National Security
          Council (Parts 200—299)

                           881

-------
       Title 47—Telecommunication—Continued
Chap.
 Ill  National Telecommunications and Information Administration,
        Department of Commerce (Parts 300—399)

   Title 48—Federal Acquisition Regulations System

   1  Federal Acquisition Regulation (Parts 1—99)
   2  Department of Defense (Parts 200—299)
   3  Department of Health and Human Services (Parts 300—399)
   4  Department of Agriculture (Parts 400—499)
   5  General Services Administration (Parts 500—599)
   6  Department of State (Parts 600—699)
   7  United  States Agency for International  Development (Parts
        700—799)
   8  Department of Veterans Affairs (Parts 800—899)
   9  Department of Energy (Parts 900—999)
  10  Department of the Treasury (Parts 1000--1099)
  12  Department of Transportation (Parts 1200—1299)
  13  Department of Commerce (Parts 1300—1399)
  14  Department of the Interior (Parts 1400—1499)
  15  Environmental Protection Agency (Parts 1500—1599)
  16  Office  of Personnel  Management, Federal Employees Health
        Benefits Acquisition Regulation (Parts 1600—1699)
  17  Office of Personnel Management (Parts 1700—1799)
  18  National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Parts 1800—
        1899)
  19  Broadcasting Board of Governors (Parts 1900—1999)
  20  Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Parts 2000—2099)
  21  Office of Personnel Management,  Federal Employees Group Life
        Insurance Federal Acquisition Regulation (Parts 2100—2199)
  23  Social Security Administration (Parts 2300—2399)
  24  Department of Housing and Urban  Development (Parts 2400—
        2499)
  25  National Science Foundation (Parts 2500—2599)
  28  Department of Justice (Parts 2800—2899)
  29  Department of Labor (Parts 2900—2999)
  30  Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security Acquisi-
        tion Regulation (HSAR) (Parts 3000—3099)
  34  Department of Education  Acquisition  Regulation (Parts 3400—
        3499)
  35  Panama Canal Commission (Parts 3500—3599)
  44  Federal Emergency Management Agency (Parts 4400—4499)
  51  Department of the Army Acquisition Regulations (Parts 5100—
        5199)
  52  Department of the Navy Acquisition Regulations (Pa,rts 5200—
        5299)
  53  Department of the Air  Force Federal Acquisition Regulation
        Supplement (Parts 5300—5399)

                          882

-------
Title 48—Federal Acquisition Regulations System—Continued
   Chap.
     54  Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense (Parts 5400—
            5499)
     57  African Development Foundation (Parts 5700—5799)
     61  General  Services Administration  Board of Contract  Appeals
            (Parts 6100—6199)
     63  Department of Transportation Board of Contract Appeals (Parts
            6300—6399)
     99  Cost Accounting Standards Board, Office of Federal Procure-
            ment Policy, Office of Management and Budget (Parts 9900—
            9999)

                   Title 49—Transportation

         SUBTITLE  A—OFFICE OF THE  SECRETARY  OF  TRANSPORTATION
            (PARTS 1—99)
         SUBTITLE B—OTHER REGULATIONS RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION
      I  Research, and Special Programs Administration, Department of
            Transportation (Parts 100—199)
     II  Federal Railroad Administration, Department of Transportation
            (Parts 200—299)
     III  Federal Motor  Carrier  Safety Administration, Department of
            Transportation (Parts 300—399)
     IV  Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (Parts 400—499)
     V  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
            Transportation (Parts 500—599)
     VI  Federal Transit Administration, Department of Transportation
            (Parts 600—699)
    VII  National Railroad  Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)  (Parts
            700—799)
   VIII  National Transportation Safety Board (Parts 800—999)
     X  Surface Transportation Board,  Department of Transportation
            (Parts 1000—1399)
     XI  Bureau  of  Transportation Statistics, Department of Transpor-
            tation (Parts 1400—1499)
    XII  Transportation Security Administration, Department of Home-
            land Security (Parts 1500—1599)

               Title 50-Wildlife and Fisheries

      I  United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Inte-
            rior (Parts 1—199)
     II  National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmos-
            pheric Administration, Department of Commerce (Parts 200—
            299)
     III  International Fishing and Related Activities (Parts 300—399)
     IV  Joint Regulations (United States Fish and Wildlife Service,  De-
            partment of the Interior and National Marine Fisheries Serv-
            ice, National Oceanic  and Atmospheric Administration,  De-
            partment of Commerce); Endangered Species Committee Reg-
            ulations  (Parts 400—499)

                             883

-------
      Title 50—Wildlife and Fisheries—Continued
Chap.
  V  Marine Mammal Commission (Parts 500—599)
  VI  Fishery Conservation and Management, National Oceanic and
        Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce (Parts
        600—699)

              CFR Index and Finding Aids

      Subject/Agency Index
      List of Agency Prepared Indexes
      Parallel Tables of Statutory Authorities and Rules
      List of CFR Titles, Chapters, Subchapters, and Parts
      Alphabetical List of Agencies Appearing in the CFR
                          884

-------
      Alphabetical List of Agencies Appearing in the CFR
                             (Revised as of July 1, 2004)
                            Agency
Administrative Committee of the Federal Register
Advanced Research Projects Agency
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
African Development Foundation
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Agency for International Development, United States
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Agricultural Marketing Service
Agricultural Research Service
Agriculture Department
  Agricultural Marketing Service
  Agricultural Research Service
  Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
  Chief Financial Officer,  Office of
  Commodity Credit Corporation
  Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension
    Service
  Economic Research Service
  Energy, Office of
  Environmental Quality, Office of
  Farm Service Agency
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
  Food and Nutrition Service
  Food Safety and Inspection Service
  Foreign Agricultural Service
  Forest  Service
  Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration
  Information Resources Management, Office of
  Inspector General, Office of
  National Agricultural Library
  National Agricultural Statistics Service
  Natural Resources Conservation Service
  Operations, Office of
  Procurement and Property Management, Office of
  Rural Business-Cooperative Service
  Rural Development Administration
  Rural Housing Service
  Rural Telephone Bank
  Rural Utilities Service
  Secretary of Agriculture, Office of
  Transportation, Office of
  World Agricultural Outlook Board
Air Force Department
  Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement
Air Transportation Stabilization Board
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Bureau of
AMTRAK
American Battle Monuments Commission
American Indians, Office of the Special Trustee
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Appalachian Regional Commission
 CFR Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter

1,1
32, I
36, VIII
22, XV
48,57
22,11
48,7
7, I, IX, X, XI
7, V
5, LXXIII
7, I, IX, X, XI
7, V
7, III;  9, I
7, XXX
7, xrv
7, xxxrv

7, XXXVII
7, XXIX
7, XXXI
7, VII, XVIII
48,4
7, IV
7,11
9,111
7, XV
36,11
7, VIII; 9, II
7, XXVII
7, XXVI
7, XLI
7, XXXVI
7, VI
7, XXVIII
7, XXXII
7, XVIII, XLII
7, XLII
7, XVIII, XXXV
7, XVI
7, XVII, XVIII, XLII
7, Subtitle A
7, XXXIII
7, XXXVIII
32, VII
48,53
14, VI
27,1
27, II
49, VII
36, IV
25, VII
7, III;  9, I
5, IX
                                        885

-------
                            Agency
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board
Arctic Research Commission
Armed Forces Retirement Home
Army Department
  Engineers, Corps of
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Benefits Review Board
Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs, Office of
Blind or Severely Disabled, Committee for Purchase From
  People Who Are
Broadcasting Board of Governors
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Census Bureau
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Central Intelligence Agency
Chief Financial Officer, Office of
Child Support Enforcement, Office of
Children and Families,  Administration for
Civil Rights, Commission on
Civil Rights, Office for
Coast Guard
Coast Guard (Great Lakes Pilotage)
Commerce Department
  Census Bureau
  Economic Affairs, Under Secretary
  Economic Analysis, Bureau of
  Economic Development Administration
  Emergency Management and Assistance
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Fishery Conservation and Management
  Foreign-Trade Zones  Board
  Industry and Security, Bureau of
  International Trade Administration
  National Institute of Standards and Technology
  National Marine Fisheries Service
  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  National Telecommunications and Information
   Administration
  National Weather Service
  Patent and Trademark Office, United States
  Productivity, Technology and Innovation, Assistant
   Secretary for
  Secretary of Commerce, Office of
  Technology, Under Secretary for
  Technology Administration
  Technology Policy, Assistant Secretary for
Commercial Space Transportation
Commodity Credit Corporation
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Community Planning and Development, Office of Assistant
  Secretary for
Community Services, Office of
Comptroller of the Currency
Construction Industry Collective Bargaining Commission
Consumer Product Safety Commission
Cooperative State Research,  Education, and Extension
  Service
Copyright Office
Corporation for National and Community Service
Cost Accounting Standards Board
Council on Environmental Quality
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the
  District of Columbia
Customs and Border Protection Bureau
Defense Contract Audit Agency
Defense Department
 CFR Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter
36, XI
45, XXIII
5, XI
32, V
33, II; 36, HI
48, 51
20, VII
34, V
41,51

22, V
48,19
15,1
42, IV
32, XIX
7, XXX
45, III
45, II, III, IV, X
45, VII
34, I
33, I; 46, I; 49, IV
46, III
44, IV
15, I
37, V
15, VIII
13, III
44,1V
48, 13
50, VI
15, IV
15, VII
15, III; 19, III
15,11
50, II, IV, VI
15, IX; 50, II, III, IV, VI
15, XXIII; 47, III

15, IX
37, I
37, IV

15, Subtitle A
37, V
15, XI
37, IV
14, III
7, XIV
5, XLI; 17, I
24, V, VI

45.X
12,1
29, IX
5, LXXI; 16, II
7, XXXIV

37, II
45, XII, XXV
48, 99
40, V
28, VIII

19,1
32, I
5, XXVI; 32,  Subtitle A;
40, VII
                                         886

-------
                            Agency
  Advanced Research Projects Agency
  Air Force Department
  Army Department

  Defense Intelligence Agency
  Defense Logistics Agency
  Engineers, Corps of
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  National Imagery and Mapping Agency
  Navy Department
  Secretary of Defense, Office of
Defense Contract Audit Agency
Defense Intelligence Agency
Defense Logistics Agency
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Delaware River Basin Commission
District of Columbia, Court Services and Offender Supervision
  Agency for the
Drug Enforcement Administration
East-West Foreign Trade Board  •
Economic Affairs, Under Secretary
Economic Analysis, Bureau of
Economic Development Administration
Economic Research Service
Education, Department of
  Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs, Office
    of
  Civil Rights, Office for
  Educational Research and Improvement, Office of
  Elementary and Secondary Education, Office of
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Postsecondary Education, Office of
  Secretary of Education, Office of
  Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of
  Vocational and Adult Education, Office of
Educational Research and Improvement, Office of
Elementary and Secondary Education, Office of
Emergency Oil and Gas Guaranteed Loan Board
Emergency Steel Guarantee Loan Board
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Employees' Compensation Appeals  Board
Employees Loyalty Board
Employment and Training Administration
Employment Standards Administration
Endangered Species Committee
Energy, Department of
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
  Property Management Regulations
Energy, Office of
Engineers, Corps of
Engraving and Printing, Bureau of
Environmental Protection Agency
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Property Management Regulations
Environmental Quality, Office of
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Equal Opportunity, Office of Assistant Secretary for
Executive Office of the President
  Administration, Office of
  Environmental Quality, Council on
  Management and Budget, Office of

  National Drug Control Policy, Office of
  National Security Council
  Presidential Documents
  Science and Technology Policy, Office  of
 CFR Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter
32, I
32, VII
32, V; 33, II; 36, HI, 48,
51
32, I
32, I, XII; 48, 54
33, II; 36, III
48, 2
32, I
32, VI; 48, 52
32,1
32,1
32,1
32, XII; 48, 54
10, XVII
18, III
28, VIII

21,11
15, XIII
37, V
15, VIII
13, III
7, XXXVII
5, LIII
34, V

34, I
34, VII
34,11
48,34
34, VI
34, Subtitle A
34, III
34, IV
34, VII
34,11
13, V
13, IV
29, XXV
20, IV
5, V
20, V
20, VI
50, IV
5, XXIII; 10, II, III, X
48, 9
5, XXIV; 18, I
41, 109
7, XXIX
33, II; 36, III
31, VI
5, LIV; 40,1, IV, VII
48, 15
41, 115
7, XXXI
5, LXII; 29, XIV
24,1
3,1
5, XV
40, V
5, III,  LXXVII; 14, VI;
48, 99
21, III
32, XXI; 47, 2
3
32, XXIV; 47, II
                                         887

-------
                            Agency
  Trade Representative, Office of the United States
Export-Import Bank of the United States
Family Assistance, Office of
Farm Credit Administration
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation
Farm Service Agency
Federal Acquisition Regulation
Federal Aviation Administration
  Commercial Space Transportation
Federal Claims Collection Standards
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Office of
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Federal Election Commission
Federal Emergency Management Agency
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Federal Acquisition
  Regulation
Federal Employees Health Benefits Acquisition Regulation
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council
Federal Financing Bank
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight  Office
Federal Housing Finance Board
Federal Labor Relations Authority, and General Counsel of
  the Federal Labor Relations Authority
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
Federal Management Regulation
Federal Maritime Commission
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service
Federal Mine Safety and Health Beview Commission
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
Federal Procurement  Policy Office
Federal Property Management Regulations
Federal Railroad Administration
Federal Register, Administrative Committee of
Federal Register, Office of
Federal Reserve System
  Board of Governors
Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board
Federal Service Impasses Panel
Federal Trade Commission
Federal Transit Administration
Federal Travel Regulation System
Fine Arts, Commission on
Fiscal Service
Fish and Wildlife Service, United States
Fishery Conservation  and Management
Food and Drug Administration
Food and Nutrition Service
Food Safety and Inspection Service
Foreign Agricultural Service
Foreign Assets Control, Office of
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States
Foreign Service Grievance Board
Foreign Service Impasse Disputes Panel
Foreign Service Labor Relations Board
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
Forest Service
General Accounting Office
General Services Administration
  Contract Appeals, Board of
  Federal Acquiaition Regulation
 CFR Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter
15, XX
5, LII; 12, IV
45, II
5, XXXI; 12, VI
5, XXX; 12, XIV
7, VII, XVIII
48, 1
14,1
14, III
31, IX
5, XXIX; 47, I
41. 60
7, IV
5, XXII; 12, III
11, I
44, I
48, 44
48, 21

48, 16
5, XXIV; 18, I
12, XI
12, VIII
23, I, II
1, IV
12, XVII
12, IX
5, XIV; 22, XIV

31, VII
41, 102
46, IV
29, XII
5, LXXIV; 29, XXVII
49, III
28, III
48, 99
41, 101
49,11
1,1
1, II
12, II
5, LVIII
5, VI,  LXXVI
5, XIV
5, XLVII; 16, I
49, VI
41, Subtitle F
45, XXI
31, II
50, I, IV
50, VI
21,1
7,11
9,111
7, XV
31, V
45, V
22, IX
22, XIV
22, XIV
15, IV
36,11
4,1
5, LVII; 41, 105
48, 61
48, 5

-------
                            Agency
  Federal Management Regulation
  Federal Property Management Regulations
  Federal Travel Regulation System
  General
  Payment From a Non-Federal Source for Travel Expenses
  Payment of Expenses Connected With the Death of Certain
    Employees
  Relocation Allowances
  Temporary Duty (TDY) Travel Allowances
Geological Survey
Government Ethics, Office of
Government National Mortgage Association
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration
Harry S. Truman Scholarship Foundation
Health and Human Services, Department of
  Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
  Child Support Enforcement, Office of
  Children and Families, Administration for
  Community Services, Office of
  Family Assistance, Office of
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Food and Drug Administration
  Human Development Services, Office of
  Indian Health Service
  Inspector General (Health Care), Office of
  Public Health Service
  Refugee Resettlement, Office of
Homeland Security, Department of
  Coast Guard
  Coast Guard (Great Lakes Pilotage)
  Customs and Border Protection Bureau
  Federal Emergency Management Agency
  Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bureau
  Immigration and Naturalization
  Transportation Security Administration
Housing and Urban Development, Department of
  Community Planning and Development, Office of Assistant
    Secretary for
  Equal Opportunity, Office of Assistant Secretary for
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, Office of
  Government National Mortgage Association
  Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner, Office of
    Assistant Secretary for
  Housing, Office of, and Multifamily Housing Assistance
    Restructuring, Office of
  Inspector General, Office of
  Public and Indian Housing, Office of Assistant Secretary for
  Secretary, Office of
Housing—Federal Housing Commissioner, Office of Assistant
  Secretary for
Housing, Office of, and Multifamily Housing Assistance
  Restructuring, Office of
Human Development Services, Office of
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bureau
Immigration and Naturalization
Immigration Review, Executive Office for
Independent Counsel, Office of
Indian Affairs, Bureau of
Indian Affairs, Office of the Assistant Secretary
Indian Arts and Crafts Board
Indian Health Service
Industry and Security, Bureau of
Information Resources Management, Office of
Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives and
  Records Administration
Inspector General
 CPU Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter
41, 102
41, 101
41, Subtitle F
41, 300
41, 304
41, 303

41, 302
41, 301
30, IV
5, XVI
24, III
7, VIII; 9, II
45, XVIII
5, XLV; 45, Subtitle A
42,1V
45, III
45, II, III, IV, X
45, X
45, II
48,3
21, I
45, xm
25, V; 42, I
42, V
42,1
45, IV
6,1
33,1; 46,1; 49, IV
46, III
19,1
44, I
19, IV
8,1
49, XII
5, LXV; 24, Subtitle B
24, V, VI

24,1
48, 24
12, XVII
24,111
24, II, VIII, X, XX

24, IV

24, XII
24, IX
24, Subtitle A, VII
24, II, VIII, X, XX

24,1V

45, XIII
19,1V
8,1
8, V
28, VH
25, I, V
25, VI
25,11
25, V; 42,1
15, VII
7, XXVII
32, XX
                                         889

-------
                            Agency
  Agriculture Department
  Health and Human Services Department
  Housing and Urban Development Department
Institute of Peace, United States
Inter-American Foundation
Interior Department
  American Indians, Office of the Special Trustee
  Endangered Species Committee
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Property Management Regulations System
  Fish and Wildlife Service, United States
  Geological Survey
  Indian Affairs, Bureau of
  Indian Affairs, Office of the Assistant Secretary
  Indian Arts and Crafts Board
  Land Management. Bureau of
  Minerals Management Service
  National Indian Gaming Commission
  National Park Service
  Reclamation, Bureau of
  Secretary of the Interior, Office of
  Surface Mining and Reclamation Appeals, Board of
  Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Office of
Internal Revenue Service
International Boundary and Water Commission, United States
  and Mexico, United States Section
International Development, United States Agency for
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
International Development Cooperation Agency, United
  States
International Fishing and Related Activities
International Investment, Office of
International Joint Commission, United States and Canada
International Organizations Employees Loyalty Board
International Trade Administration
International Trade Commission, United States
Interstate Commerce Commission
James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation
Japan-United States Friendship Commission
Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries
Justice Department

  Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Bureau of
  Drug Enforcement Administration
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Claims Collection Standards
  Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
  Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United
    States
  Immigration Review, Executive  Office for
  Offices of Independent Counsel
  Prisons, Bureau of
  Property Management Regulations
Labor Department
  Benefits Review Board
  Employee Benefits Security Administration
  Employees' Compensation Appeals Board
  Employment and Training Administration
  Employment Standards Administration
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Office of
  Federal Procurement Regulations System
  Labor-Management Standards, Office of
  Mine Safety and Health Administration
  Occupational Safety and Health Administration
  Public Contracts
  Secretary of Labor, Office of
 CFR Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter
7, XXVI
42, V
24, XII
22, XVII
5, LXIII; 22, X

25, Vn
50, IV
48, 14
41, 114
50, I, IV
30, IV
25, I, V
25, VI
25. II
43, II
30, II
25, III
36, I
43, I
43, Subtitie A
30, III
30. VII
26. I
22, XI

22, II
48, 7
22, XII

50, III
31, VIII
22, IV
5, V
15, III;  19, III
19. II
5, XL
45, XXIV
22, XVI
20, VIII
5, XXVIII; 28, I, XI; 40,
IV
27, II
21, II
48, 28
31, IX
28, III
45, V

8, V
28, VI
28, V
41, 128
5, XLII
20, VII
29, XXV
20, IV
20, V
20, VI
48,29
41, 60
41, 50
29, II, IV
30, I
29, XVII
41, 50
29, Subtitle A
                                         890

-------
                            Agency
  Veterans' Employment and Training Service, Office of the
    Assistant Secretary for
  Wage and Hour Division
  Workers' Compensation Programs, Office of
Labor-Management Standards, Office of
Land Management, Bureau of
Legal Services Corporation
Library of Congress
  Copyright Office
Local Television Loan Guarantee Board
Management and Budget, Office of

Marine Mammal Commission
Maritime Administration
Merit Systems Protection Board
Micronesian Status Negotiations, Office for
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Minerals Management Service
Minority Business Development Agency
Miscellaneous Agencies
Monetary Offices
Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National
  Environmental Policy Foundation
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
National Agricultural Library
National Agricultural Statistics Service
National and Community Service, Corporation for
National Archives and Records Administration
  Information Security Oversight Office
National Bureau of Standards
National Capital Planning Commission
National Commission for Employment Policy
National Commission on Libraries and Information Science
National Council on Disability
National Counterintelligence Center
National Credit Union Administration
National Crime Prevention and Privacy Compact Council
National Drug Control Policy, Office of
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
National Imagery and Mapping Agency
National Indian Gaming Commission
National Institute for Literacy
National Institute of Standards and Technology
National Labor Relations Board
National Marine Fisheries Service
National Mediation Board
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Park Service
National Railroad Adjustment Board
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
National Science Foundation
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
National Security Council
National Security Council and Office of Science and
  Technology Policy
National Telecommunications and Information
  Administration
National Transportation Safety Board
National Weather Service
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation, Office of
Navy Department
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Neighborhood Reinvestment  Corporation
Northeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste
  Commission
 CPR Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter
41, 61; 20, IX

29, V
20,1
29, II, IV
43,11
45, XVI
36, VII
37,11
7, XX
5, III, LXXVII; 14, VI;
48,99
50, V
46,11
5,11
32, XXVII
30,1
30,11
15, XIV
1, IV
31, I
36, XVI

5, LIX; 14, V
48, 18
7, XLI
7, XXXVI
45, XII, XXV
5, LXVI; 36, XII
32, XX
15,11
1,1V
i, rv
45, XVII
34, XII
32, XVin
12, VII
28, IX
21, III
45, XI
23, II, HI; 49, V
32,1
25, in
34, XI
15,11
5, LXI; 29,1
SO, II, IV, VI
29, X
15, IX; 50, II, III, IV, VI
36,1
29, III
49, VII
5. XLIII; 45, VI
48,25
32, XXI
47,11

15, XXIII; 47, III

49, VIII
15, IX
7, VI
25,1V
32, VI
48, 52
24, XXV
10, xvm
                                         891

-------
                            Agency
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
Offices of Independent Counsel
Oklahoma City National Memorial Trust
Operations Office
Overseas Private Investment Corporation
Panama Canal Commission
Panama Canal Regulations
Patent and Trademark Office, United States
Payment From a Non-Federal Source for Travel Expenses
Payment of Expenses Connected With the Death of Certain
  Employees
Peace Corps
Pennsylvania Avenue Development Corporation
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Personnel Management, Office of
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Federal
   Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Employees Health Benefits Acquisition Regulation
Postal Rate Commission
Postal Service, United States
Postsecondary Education, Office of
President's Commission on White House Fellowships
Presidential Documents
Presidio Trust
Prisons, Bureau of
Procurement and Property Management, Office of
Productivity, Technology and Innovation, Assistant
  Secretary
Public Contracts, Department of Labor
Public and Indian Housing, Office of Assistant Secretary for
Public Health Service
Railroad Retirement Board
Reclamation, Bureau of
Refugee Resettlement, Office of
Regional Action Planning Commissions
Relocation Allowances
Research and Special Programs Administration
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Rural Development Administration
Rural Housing Service
Rural Telephone Bank
Rural Utilities Service
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
Science and Technology Policy, Office of
Science and Technology Policy, Office of, and National
  Security Council
Secret Service
Securities and Exchange Commission
Selective Service System
Small Business Administration
Smithsonian Institution
Social Security Administration
Soldiers' and Airmen's Home, United States
Special Counsel,  Office of
Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of
State Department
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Surface Mining and Reclamation Appeals, Board of
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Office of
Surface Transportation Board
Susquehanna River Basin Commission
Technology Administration
Technology Policy, Assistant Secretary for
 CFB, Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter
5, XLVIII; 10, I
48, 20
29, XVII
29, XX
28, VI
36, XV
7, XXVIII
5, XXXIII; 22, VTI
48, 35
35, I
37,1
41, 304
41, 303

22, III
36, IX
29, XL
5,1, XXXV; 45, VIII
48, 17
48,21

48, 16
5, XLVI; 39, HI
5, LX; 39,1
34, VI
1, IV
3
36, X
28, V
7, XXXII
37,1V

41,50
24, IX
42,1
20,11
43,1
45,1V
13, V
41, 302
49,1
7, xvm, XLII
7, XLH
7, XVin, XXXV
7, XVI
7, XVII, XVin, XLII
33, IV
32, XXIV
47,11

31, rv
17,11
32, XVI
13,1
36, V
20, III; 48, 23
5, XI
5, VIH
34, IH
22, I; 28, XI
48,6
30, in
30, VH
49.X
is, vm
15, XI
37,1V
                                         892

-------
                             Agency
Technology, Under Secretary for
Tennessee Valley Authority
Thrift Supervision Office, Department of the Treasury
Trade Representative, United States, Office of
Transportation, Department of
  Commercial Space Transportation
  Contract Appeals, Board of
  Emergency Management and Assistance
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Aviation Administration
  Federal Highway Administration
  Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
  Federal Railroad Administration
  Federal Transit Administration
  Maritime Administration
  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
  Research and Special Programs Administration
  Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
  Secretary of Transportation, Office of
  Surface Transportation Board
  Transportation Statistics Bureau
Transportation, Office of
Transportation Security Administration
Transportation Statistics Bureau
Travel Allowances, Temporary Duty (TDY)
Treasury Department

  Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
  Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
  Comptroller of the Currency
  Customs  and Border Protection Bureau
  Engraving and Printing, Bureau of
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
  Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
  Fiscal Service
  Foreign Assets Control, Office of
  Internal Revenue Service
  International Investment, Office of
  Monetary Offices
  Secret Service
  Secretary of the Treasury, Office of
  Thrift Supervision, Office of
Truman, Harry S. Scholarship Foundation
United States and Canada, International Joint Commission
United States and Mexico, International Boundary and Water
  Commission, United States Section
Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission
Veterans Affairs Department
  Federal Acquisition Regulation
Veterans' Employment and Training Service, Office of the
  Assistant Secretary for
Vice President of the United States, Office of
Vocational and Adult Education, Office of
Wage and Hour Division
Water Resources Council
Workers' Compensation Programs, Office of
World Agricultural Outlook Board
 CFR Title, Subtitle or
       Chapter
37, V
5, LXIX; 18, XIII
12, V
15, XX
5, L
14, III
48, 63
44, IV
48, 12
14, I
23, I, II
49, HI
49, II
49, VI
46, II
23, II, III; 49, V
49, I
33,1V
14, II; 49, Subtitle A
49.X
49, XI
7, XXXIII
49, XII
49, XI
41, 301
5, XXI; 12, XV; 17, IV;
31, IX
27,1
12, xvm
12,1
19, I
31, VI
48, 10
31, VII
31, II
31, V
26, I
31, VIII
31, I
31,1V
31, Subtitle A
12, V
45, XVIII
22, IV
22, XI

43, III
38, I
48, 8
41, 61; 20, IX

32, XXVIII
34, IV
29, V
18, VI
20,1
7, XXXVIII
                                         893

-------

-------
                   List of  CFR  Sections Affected
  All changes in this volume of the Code of Federal Regulations which
were made by documents published in the FEDERAL REGISTER since Jan-
uary 1, 2001, are enumerated in the following list. Entries indicate  the
nature of the changes effected. Page numbers refer to FEDERAL REGISTER
pages. The user should consult the entries for chapters and parts as well
as sections for revisions.
  Title 40 was established at 36 FR 12213, June 29, 1971. For the period be-
fore January 1, 2001, see the "List of CFR  Sections  Affected,  1964-1972,
1973-1985, and 1986-2000," published in ten separate volumes.
               2001
40 CFR
                                66 PR
                                 Page
Chapter I
Chapter         I  Nomenclature
    change	34375,34376
136.3  (a) and (b) amended	3474
  Regulation at 66 FR 3474 with-
    drawn 	26795
  (b)(40) in part and (41) redesig-
    nated as new (b)(41) and (42);
    new (b)(41) revised; eff. 7-18-01
    	32776
141.2  Amended	7061
  Regulation at 66 PR 7061 eff. date
    delayed	16134
  Regulation at 66 PR 7061 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02	28350
141.6  (a) and (c) revised; (j) and (k)
    added	7061
  Regulation at 66 PR 7061 eff. date
    delayed; (j)amended	16134
  Regulation at 66 PR 7061 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02; (j) amended
    	28350
141.11  (a) amended; (b) revised	7061
  Regulation at 66 PR 7061 eff. date
    delayed	16134
  Regulation at 66 PR 7061 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02	28350
141.12  Amended	3776
141.21  (f)(3) table amended	3493
  Regulation at 66 FR 3493 with-
    drawn 	26795
141.23  (k)(l) table revised	3493
40 CFR—Continued
                                                                       66 FR
                                                                        Page
Chapter I—Continued
  (a)(4)(i) table, (k)(l) table,  (2)
   table, (3) introductory text and
   (ii) table amended; (a)(5), (c) in-
   troductory text, (f)(l), (i)(l), (2)
   and (k)(2) introductory text re-
   vised; (c)(9) and (1)(4) added; eff.
   in part 1-22-04	7061
  Regulation at 66 FR 7061 eff. date
   delayed in part	16134
  Regulation at 66 PR 3493 with-
   drawn 	26795
  Regulation at 66 FR 7061 eff. date
   delayed in part to 2-22-02	28350
141.24  (e)(l) amended	3495
  (f)(15)  introductory  text  and
   (h)(ll)   introductory   text
   amended;    (f)(15)(i),    (ii),
   (h)(ll)(i)  and  (ii)  revised;
   (f)(15)(iii),   (iv),    (v),   (22),
   (h)(ll)(iii),  (iv),  (v) and  (20)
   added; eff. in part 1-22-04	7063
  Regulation at 66 FR 7063 eff. date
   delayed in part	16134
  Regulation at 66 PR 3495 with-
   drawn 	26795
  Regulation at 66 FR 7061 eff. date
   delayed in part to 2-22-02	28350
141.25  (a) table revised	3495
  Regulation at 66 FR 3495 with-
   drawn 	26795
141.30  (e) and (h) amended	3776
141.35  (c),  (d),  (e)  and  (f)   re-
   vised	2300
  (d) Table 1 corrected	27215
  (c) amended	46225
                                    895

-------
                           40 CFR (7-1-04 Edition)
40 CFR—Continued
                                  66 PR
                                   Page
40 CFR—Continued
Chapter I—Continued
141.40  (a)(l)(iii)      introductory
    text, (v) introductory text, (3)
    Table 1, (4)(i) Table 2, (5)(ii)(B),
    (C), (G),  (7)(i),  (ii), (iii)  and
    (b)(l)(ix)  revised; Appendix A
    amended	2302
  (a)(3) Table 1 corrected	27215
  (a)(5)(ii)(G)(7) amended	46225
141.51  (b) table amended	7063
  Regulation at 66 FR 7063 eff. date
    delayed	16134
  Regulation at 66 PR 7063 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02	28350
141.60  (b)(4)added	7063
  Regulation at 66 FR 7063 eff. date
    delayed	16134
  Regulation at 66 FR 7063 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02	28350
141.62  (b) introductory text, table
    and  (c)  table  amended; (d)
    added	7063
  Regulation at 66 FR 7063 eff. date
    delayed	16134
  Regulation at 66 FR 7063 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02	28350
141.64  (b)(l) and (2) amended	3776
141.65  (b)(l) and (2) amended	3776
141.71  (b)(6)amended	3776
141.73  (a)(3) and (d) amended	3776
141.74  (a)(l)  table and (2) amend-
    ed	3496
  Regulation at 66  FR 3496 with-
    drawn 	26795
141.76  Added; eff. 8-7-01	31103
141.130  (b)(l) and (2) amended	3776
141.131  (b)(2)   amended;    (b)(3)
    added	3776
141.132  (a)(2), (b)(l) table, (iii) and
    (c)(l)(i) amended; (b)(l)(i) re-
    vised; (b)(l)(iv) redesignated as
    (b)(l)(v);     new    (b)(l)(iv)
    added	3776
141.133  (a)(l),  (b)(l)(i),  (c)(l)(i),
    (2)(i),  (ii)  and  (d) amended;
    (b)(l)(ii)   and   (iii)  revised;
    (b)(D(iv) added	3777
141.134  (b) table and (c) table re-
    vised; (d) table amended	3778
  (d) table corrected	990
141.135  (a)(2)(iii), (b)(4) and (c)(l)
    amended; (b)(2) table, (4) intro-
    ductory text and (c)(l) table re-
    vised	3779
141.154  (b) revised; (f) added	7064
  Regulation at 66 FR 7064 eff. date
    delayed	16134
                                  66 FR
                                   Page
Chapter I—Continued
  Regulation at 66 FR 7064 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02	28350
141.151—141.155 (Subpart O)  Ap-
    pendix A amended 	7064
  Regulation at 66 FR 7064 eff. date
    delayed	16134
  Regulation at 66 FR 7064 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02	28350
141.170  (a)    introductory    text
    amended	3779
141.172  (a)(2)(iii)(A), (5), (b)(2) in-
    troductory  text,  (3)(i)  and
    (4)(ii) amended	3779
141.173  Introductory text amend-
    ed	3779
141.175  Introductory text amend-
    ed; (c) added	3779
141.201—141.210 (Subpart Q)  Ap-
    pendices A and B amended	7065
  Regulation  at  66 FR 7065 eff.
    date delayed	16134
  Regulation at 66 FR 7065 eff. date
    delayed to 2-22-02	28350
  Appendices  A and B  amended;
    eff. 8-7-01 	31104
142.12  (b)(3)(i)   revised;   (d)(2)
    amended	3780
142.14  (a)(4)(ii)(A)(7)    amended;
    (a)(4)(ii)(A)(
-------
                         List of CFR Sections Affected
                                   67 PR
40 CFR—Continued
Chapter I—Continued
  (a) Table IA and (b) amended	69971
140.4  (b)(l)(ii)added	35743
141,2  Amended	1835
141.35  (c) amended	11046
141.21  (f)(3) table, (f)(5) and  (8)
    amended; (f)(6)(i) and  (ii)  re-
    vised	65246
  (f)(3) table revised; (f)(6)(viii) and
    (ix) added	65896
141.23  (k)(l) table revised	65246
  (a)(4)(i)  table  and  (k)(l)  table
    amended	65897
  (a)(4)(i) table corrected	68911
141.24  (e)(l) amended	65250
  (e)(l) introductory text and table
    revised	65898
141.25  (a) table revised	65250
141.40  (a)(3) Table 1 amended	65900
141.70  (e) added	1836
141.73  (a)(4) added; (d) revised	1836
141.74  (a)(l) table and (2) amend-
    ed	65252
  (a)(l) table revised	65901
141.153  (d)(4)(v)(C) amended	1836
141.151—141.155  (Subpart  O)  Ap-
    pendix A amended	70855
  Appendix A corrected	73011
141.170—141.175 (Subpart P)  Head-
    ing revised 	1836
141.170  (d)added	1836
141.202  Table 1 amended	1836
141.203  (b)(3)(ii) revised	1836
141.201—141.210  (Subpart  Q)  Ap-
    pendix A amended 	1836
  Appendix B amended	1838,70857
141.500—141.571     (Subpart    T)
    Added	1839
142.3  (b)(3) removed	70858
142.14  (a)(3),  (4)(i), (ii) introduc-
    tory text and (7) revised	1843
142.16  (g)  introductory text  re-
    vised; (j) added	1844
143.4  (b) table revised	65252
144 Policy decision	38403
144.1  (g)   introductory  text  re-
    vised	39592
144.13  (c)revised	39593
144.26  Introductory text revised;
    (d)   introductory   text   re-
    moved 	39593
144.81  (16) revised	39593
146 Policy decision	38403
147.2555  Table amended	47726
148 Determination	16262
                2003
                                         40 CFR
                                                                            68 FR
Chapter I
136.3  (a) Table IA revised; (b) and
    (e) Table II amended	43278
  (a) Table IA, (b) and (e) Table II
    corrected	54934
141.23  (a)(4)(i)  table  and  (k)(l)
    table amended	14506
141.62  (b) table amended	14506
141.154  (b) introductory text and
    (f) revised	14506
141.151—141.155  (Subpart  O)  Ap-
    pendix A amended	14506
141.201—141.210  (Subpart  Q)  Ap-
    pendix B amended	14507

                2004

(Regulations published from January 1,
       2004 through July 1, 2004)
40 CFR                          69 FR
                                   Page
Chapter I
136.3  Nomenclature change	18803
141 Nomenclature change	18803
    Meetings	21958
141.21  (f)(3) table revised; (f)(6)(x)
    added	7160
141.25  (a) table amended; eff. 8-31-
    04	31012
  (c)(l) Table B amended; eff. 7-29-
    04	38855
141.26  (b)(2)(iv) and  (5)  revised;
    (b)(6) amended; eff. 7-29-04	38855
141.62  (c) table amended; eff. 7-29-
    04	38855
141.71  (a)(2) introductory text and
    (c)(2)(i) amended; eff. 7-29-04	38855
141.72  (a)(3), (4)(i), (ii), (b)(2), (3)(i)
    and (ii) amended; eff. 7-29-04	38855
141.73  (a)(l),  (2), (4),  (b)(l),  (2),
    (c)(l) and (2) amended; eff. 7-29-
    04	38855
141.74  (b)(4)(ii), (6)(ii), (c)(3)(i) and
    (ii) amended; eff. 7-29-04	38856
141.75  (a)(2)(viii)(G)          and
    (b)(2)(iii)(G) amended; eff. 7-29-
    04	38856
141.85  (c)(2)(iii)(A)   through  (G)
    added	38856
141.132  (a)(5) amended;  eff.  7-29-
    04	38856
141.133  (a)(3)  revised;  eff.  7-29-
    04	38856
141.170  (d) amended; eff. 7-29-04	38856
                                      897

-------
                          40 CFR (7-1-04 Edition)
40 CFR—Continued
69 FB
Page
Chapter I—Continued
141.201—141.209 (Subpart  Q)  Ap-
    pendixes A  and B amended;
    eff. 7-29-04	38856
141.502  Revised; eff. 7-29-04	38856
141.530  Amended; eff. 7-29-04	38856
141.531  Amended; eff. 7-29-04	38856
141.534  Introductory text revised;
    (a)(2) amended: eff. 7-29-04	38856
141.551  (a)(2) and (b)(2) amended;
    eff. 7-29-04	38856
141.563  (b) and (c) amended; eff. 7-
    29-04	38856
141.570  (b)(2) revised eff. 7-29-04	38857
142  Meetings	21958
       40 CFR— Continued
                                                                          Page
       Chapter I — Continued
       142.14 (d)(12)(iv) and (13) amended;
          eff. 7-29-04 ................................. 38857
       142.16 (j) redesignated as (p); (1)(2)
          and new (p)(2)(ii) amended; eff.
          7-29-04 ....................................... 38857
       142.62 (g)(2)  amended:  eff. 7-29-
          04 .............................................. 38857
       143  Meetings ................................. 21958
       143.4 Nomenclature change ........... 18803
       147  Comment request .................... 18478
        Nomenclature change .................. 18803
       147.2200  Revised ............................. 8568
        Introductory   text   amended;
          (a)(2), (b)(2), (c)(2), (d)(2) and
          (e)(2) added ................................. 8828
                                      o
                                     898

-------