EPA-600/2-80-149
                                      August  1980
   THE REMOVAL OF METALS AND VIRUSES IN
  ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT SEQUENCES
                    by

             Steven E. Esmond
          Albert C. Petrasek, Jr.
              Harold W. Wolf
             D. Craig Andrews
           Texas A&M University
      College Station, Texas  77843
            Grant No. S-801026
              Project Officer

              Irwin Kugelman
       Wastewater Research Division
Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
          Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
    OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          CINCINNATI, OHIO  45268

-------
                                DISCLAIMER


     This report has been reviewed by the Municipal Environmental Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publica-
tion.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect
the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.

-------
                                  FOREWORD


     The Environmental Protection Agency was created because of increasing
public and government concern about the dangers of pollution to the health
and welfare of the American people.  Noxious air, foul water, and spoiled
land are tragic testimony to the deterioration of our natural environment.
The complexity of that environment and the interplay between its components
require a concentrated and integrated attack on the problem.

     Research and development is that necessary first step in problem
solution and it involves defining the problem, measuring its impact, and
searching for solutions.  The Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
develops new and improved technology and systems for the prevention, treat-
ment, and management of wastewater and solid and hazardous waste pollutant
discharges from municipal and community sources, for the preservation and
treatment of public drinking water supplies, and to minimize the adverse
economic, social, health, and aesthetic effects of pollution.  This publi-
cation is one of the projects of that research; a most vital communications
link between the researcher and the user community.

     This report details studies of metals  and virus removal in a variety of
advanced waste treatment systems.
                               Francis  T.  Mayo
                                  Director
                 Municipal  Environmental  Research  Laboratory
                                     m

-------
                                 ABSTRACT
     An extensive study of metals and virus removals by advanced wastewater
treatment processes was conducted in Dallas, Texas from June 1972 through
December 1973.  Processes applied to a biologically nitrified effluent
included chemical coagulation with alum and/or lime, high-pH lime
treatment with and without recarbonation, filtration through unulti- and
dual-media filters., and carbon adsorption.  The high-pH lime treatment with
recarbonation provided a most effective treatment for both metals removals
and disinfection.  Boron surfaced as a material that may require other
means of control.  Although high-pH lime treatment was indicated to be
extremely effective for virus removal (or inactivation), metals removal
were not of the same order of magnitude.  Thus, efforts to control  metals
at points of discharge are strongly supported.  The removal of some metals
by biological processes appeared to be influenced by their concentration.
Median values were observed to be more indicative of the plant processes
than mean values.  Coliphages were observed to provide essentially the same
virus removals values as polioviruses.  The suggestion is made that all
wastes should be subject to biological treatment, and if such treatment
is found ineffective, then other means of control are warranted.

     This report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant No. S-801026 by
Dallas Water Utilities under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.  Work was performed under subcontract to Texas A&M
University.  This report covers the period June 1972 to December 1973.

-------
                               CONTENTS

Foreword	   iii
Abstract .-......"	    1v
Figures	   vii
Tables   ...... 	  xiii
Acknowledgement	    xx

   1.  Introduction. .	     1
            Background of the Dallas Program 	 .....     4
            Research Presented in This Report  .........     5
   2.  Conclusions   . . .  .	     6
   3.  Recommendations	,	     8
   4.  Description of Research Facilities	     9
            City of Dallas  Collection System 	 .....     9
            Treatment Facilities . . .	    12
   5.  Sampling and Analytical Procedures  ...........    32
            Sampling Procedures  	 .....    32
            Analytical Procedures  	 .....    33
            Virus Determinations	    36
   6.  High-pH Lime Coagulation  	 .....    33
            General  ..... 	 .....    38
            Completely-Mixed Activated Sludge System  ......    41
            Upflow Clarifier	    46
            Multimedia Filters ......'	    49
            Activated Carbon Adsorption System 	  .    49
            Metals Removals  	 .....    53
   7.  Alum Coagulation	    77
            General  . . .	    77
            Completely-Mixed Activated Sludge System  ......    81
            Upflow Clarifier 	 .....    87
            Multimedia Filters 	    87
            Activated Carbon Adsorption Column 	    92
            Metals Removals  	    96
   8.  High-pH Lime Coagulation And Single-Stage Recarbonation  .   119
            General	   119
            Completely-Mixed Activated Sludge System  	   120
            Upflow Clarifier 	   131
            Singe-Stage Recarbonation  	   131
            Multimedia Filter  	   135
            Activated Carbon Adsorption  	   135
            Metals Removals	   .139

-------
10.
Responses of Individual Metals .........
     Biological Treatment  ............
     The Three Combinations of Treatment Sequences
     Metals Removal Summary  . .
Virus. Inactivation Study
     "General
     Results And Discussion of the Virus'-Runs
166
166
179
202
221
221
223

-------
                              FIGURES
Number

  1.

  2.


  3.

  4.

  5.
                                                        Page
  7.

  8.


  9.


 10.


 11.



 12.


 13.


 14.


 15.
Existing City of Dallas water supply network
Possible sources of influents for the Pilot Plant
  at the White Rock Sewage Tratment Plant	    16

Dallas Water Reclamation Research Center - Demo Plant    17

Aerial photograph of the Demonstration Plant 	    18

No. 1 Aeration Basin with Aquarius oxygen transfer       20
  equipment	
        Section of the No. 1  Final Clarifier after
          modifications  	
                                                         22
Elevation of the Upflow Clarifier  	    24


                                                   .  .    27
Typical elevation of the No.  1 and No.  2 gravity
  filters  	
Media expansion as a function of temperature and backwash
  rate for the No. 1 Multimedia Filter   	    30

                                      ;d carbon
                                                   .  .    31
Elevation of downflow granular activated carbon
  contactors   	  ,
Process configuration: High-pH lime coagulation without
  recarbonation June, August-October 1972, November-
  December 1973
Raw Wastewater and product water COD values observed
  during the high-pH lime coagulation study  .  .  .  .

Effluent nitrogen concentrations observed during  the
  high-pH lime coagulation study 	
Frequency distributions for silver, high-pH lime
  coagulation study	
Frequency distributions for arsenic, high-pH lime
  coagulation study  	
                                                         39


                                                         42

                                                         43



                                                         59


                                                         61

-------
                       FIGURES (continued)
 Number
                                                       Page
 16.


 17.


 18.


 19.


 20.


 21.


 22.


 23.


 24.


 25.


 26.



 27.


 28.


 29.


29a.
Frequency distributions for barium,  high-pH lime
  coagulation study ......  ...........    62

Frequency distributions for cadmium, high-pH lime
  coagulation study .................    6£

Frequency distributions for cobalt,  high-pH lime
  coagulation study .... .............    65

Frequency distributions for chromium,  high-pH lime
  coagulation study ......  ,  ..........    67

Frequency distributions for mercury, high-pH lime
  coagulation study .................    69

Frequency distributions for molybdenum,  high-pH lime
  coagulation study .....  .  .  ..........    71

Frequency distributions for nickel,  high-pH lime
  coagulation study .  ................    73

Frequency distributions for lead,  high-pH lime
  coagulation study   ......  .  .  ........    74

Frequency distributions for selenium,  high-pH lime
  coagulation study ......  .  ..........    75

Process configuration:   Alum coagulation, November, 1972 -
  October 30, 1973  .  . ...............    78
Time series plots of sludge age values, and selected
  and COD concentrations for the alum coagulation
  study ....... .......  .........
                                                        79
Probability distributions for different forms  of
  nitrogen in the activated sludge influent 	    84

Probability distributions for different forms  of
  nitrogen in the upflow clarifier effluent 	    85

Probability distributions for COD and TOC concentrations
  in the activated sludge influent  	    86

Frequency distributions for total P and turbidity values
  in the upflow clarifier effluent  	    90
                                 vm

-------
                       FIGURES (continued)

Number                                                      Page

  30.     Frequency distributions for observed nitrogen
            concentrations in the final  product water,  alum
            coagulation study 	   94

  31.     Frequency distributions for selected water quality
            parameters in the final product water,  alum
            coagulation study	 .   95

  32.     Selected frequency distributions  for arsenic, alum
            coagulation study	  	  103

  33.     Selected frequency distributions  for barium,  alum
            coagulation study 	  104

  34.     Selected frequency distributions  for cadmium, alum
            coagulation study ... 	  106

  35.     Frequency distributions for cobalt  in sequence influent
            and effluent, alum coagulation  study  	  107

  36.     Frequency distributions for chromium, alum coagulation
            study	  108

  37.     Frequency distributions for mercury, alum coagulation
            study	Ill

  38.     Frequency distributions for molybdenum,  alum
            coagulation study	 .  113

  39.     Frequency distributions for nickel, alum coagulation
            study	114

  40.     Frequency distributions for lead, alum coagulation
            study	115

  41.     Frequency distributions for selenium, alum
            coagulation study 	  118

  42.     Process configuration:  High-pH lime coagulation
            and single-stage recarbonation; November 2, 1973 -
            January 31, 1974	121

  43.     Frequency distributions for selected COD data; high-pH
            lime coagulation and recarbonation study   . .  . .  123
                                   IX

-------
                         FIGURES (continued)
Number
Paqe
  44.      Frequency distributions for selected TSS data;
             high-pH lime coagulation and recarbonation
             study	124

  45.      Frequency distributions for selected NHs-N  data;
             high-pH lime coagulation and
             recarbonation study 	 128

  46.      Frequency distributions for selected nitrate-nitrite
             nitrogen data; high-pH lime coagulation and
             recarbonation study	 129

  47.      Plot of effluent COD versus effluent TSS for the  CMAS
             system,  high-pH lime coagulation  and recarbonation
             study	130

  48.      Frequency distributions for TOC data;  high-pH lime
             coagulation and recarbonation study 	 138

  49.      Frequency distributions for selected color data;  high-pH
             lime coagulation and recarbonation study  . .  .  .140

  50.      Frequency  distributions for selected organic nitrogen
             data; high-pH lime coagulation and recarbonation
             study	141

  51.      Frequency  distributions for selected total  P data; high-pH
             lime coagulation and recarbonation study  . .  .  .142

  52.      Frequency  distributions for arsenic, high-pH lime
             coagulation and recarbonation study 	 149

  53.      Frequency  distributions for barium,  high-pH lime
             coagulation and recarbonation study  	 151

  54.      Frequency  distributions for cadmium, high-pH lime
             coagulation and recarbonation study  	 153

  55.      Frequency  distributions for cobalt,  high-pH lime
             coagulation and recarbonation study  	 154

  56.      Frequency  distributions for chromium,  high-pH lime
             coagulation and recarbonation study  	 155

  57.      Frequency  distributions for mercury, high-pH lime
             coagulation and recarbonation study  	 158

-------
                         FIGURES (continued)
Number

  58.


  59.


  60.


  61.


  62.



  63.


  64.


  65.


  66.


  67.


  68.


  69.


  70.


  71.


  72.
Frequency distributions for nickel, high-pH lime
  coagulation and recarbonation study 	   160

Frequency distributions for lead, high-pH lime
  coagulation and recarbonation study 	   151

Frequency distributions for selenium, high-pH lime
  coagulation and recarbonation study .......   153

Frequency distributions for strontium, high-pH lime
  coagulation and recarbonation study .......   154

Chromium reductions vs influent concentrations, showing
  a typical concentration effect:  No. 1 activated
  sludge unit	   175

Arsenic levels in wastewater after treatment by secondary
  and tertiary processes	   180

Barium concentration in wastewater after treatment by
  secondary and teritary processes  	   190

Cadmium concentrations remaining in wastewater after
  treatment by secondary and tertiary processes .  .   191

Chromium concentrations remaining in wastewater after
  treatment by secondary and tertiary processes .  .   192

Copper concentrations remaining in wastewater after
  treatment by secondary and tertiary processes .  .   193

Iron concentrations remaining in wastewater after
  treatment by secondary and tertiary processes .  .   195

Mercury concentrations remaining in wastewater after
  treatment by secondary and tertiary processes .  .   195

Manganese concentrations remaining in wastewater after
  treatment by secondary and tertiary processes .  .   197
Lead concentrations remaining in wastewater after
  treatment by secondary and tertiary processes .
199
Selenium concentrations remaining in wastewater after
  treatment by secondary and tertiary processes .  .    200

-------
Number

  73.



  74.


  75.


  76.
                      FIGURES (continued)
Zinc concentrations remaining in wastewater
  after treatment by secondary and tertiary
  processes 	
                                                  Page
201
Residence time distribution function for the upflow
  clarifier	  222

Influent and effluent virus counts obtained during
  Virus Run Number One	  227

Influent virus counts obtained during Virus Run
  Number Two	  231
                                 xii

-------
                              TABLES
Number

  1

  2


  3


  4


  5


  6

  7

  8

  9

 10


 11


 12


 13


 14



 15
                                                        Page

Summary of existing water supply for the year 2020 ...   3
Sizes and lengths of gravity mains in the sanitary
sewer collection system  	
10
Summary of industrial and commercial discharges to the
collection system	   11
Influent metals concentrations for the fiscal year
T973   	
13
Characteristics of raw wastewater at the White Rock STP
for the period of June, 1972 through February 27, 1974 .   14

Technical data for the No. 1 aeration basin	   19

Technical date for the No. 1 final clarifier	23

Technical date for the upflow clarifier	   25

Media specifications for the No.  1 mixed-media filter.  .   28

Summary of water quality date for the high-pH lime
coagulation study  	   40

Performance summary of the completely mixed activated
sludge system high-pH lime coagulation study 	   44

Process summary of the completely-mixed activated sludge   45
system, high-pH lime coagulation study 	

Process summary for the upflow  clarifier,  high-pH lime
coagulation study  	  	   47

Performance summary for the upflow clarifier, high-pH
lime coagulation study	  .    ...   43

Process summary for the multimedia filter,  high-pH
lime coagulation study	49
                                 xm

-------
                                TABLES
Number
Page
  16      Performance summary for the multimedia filters,  high-pH
         lime coagulation study .	50

  17      Rrocess summary for the activated carbon adsorption
         system, high-pH lime coagulation study 	   51

  18      Performance summary for the activated carbon adsorption
         system, high-pH lime coagulation study 	   52

  19      Activated sludge influent metals summary high-pH lime
         coagulation study June, August-October 1972, November-     54
         December 1973	

  20      Activated sludge effluent metals summary high-pH lime
         treatment without recarbonation June, August-October 1972.
         November-December 1973	55

  21      Up-flow clarifier effluent metals summary high-pH lime
         treatment without recarbonation June, August-October 1972,
         November-December 1973 	   56

  22      Filter effluent metals summary high-pH lime treatment without
         recarbonation June, August-October 1972, November-December
         1973	57


  23      Carbon column effluent metals summary high-pH lime treatment
         without recarbonation June, August-October 1972,
         November-December 1973 	   58

  24      Overall water treatment summary alum coagulation study  .   80

  25      Performance summary of the completely-mixed activated
         sludge system, alum coagulation study  	   82

  26      Process control summary for the completely-mixed activated
         sludge system, alum coagulation study 	   83

  27      Performance summary for the upflow clarifier,alum
         coagulation study  	 	   88

  28      Process summary for the upflow clarifier,alum
         coagulation study  	   89

  29      Performance summary for the multimedia filter, alum
         coagulation study  	   91
                                  xiv

-------
                               TABLES
Number

 30


 31


 32


 33


 34


 35


 36


 37



 38



 39


 40


 41


 42


 43
                                                       Page

Performance summary for the activated carbon adsorption
column, alum coagulation study 	  93

Activated sludge influent metals summary alum treatment
November 1972 - October 1973   	97

Activated sludge effluent metals summary alum treatment
November 1972 - October 1973   	98

Up-flow clarifier metals summary; alum treatment
November 1972 - October 1973   	99
Filter effluent metals summary alum treatment
November 1972 - October 1973   	
100
Carbon column effluent metals - summary alum treatment
November 1972 - October  ................ 101

Summary of water quality data for the high-pH lime
coagulation and recarbonation study  ........  - - 122

Performance summary of the completely-mixed activated sludge
system, high-pH lime coagulation and recarbonation
study  ......................... 125

Process summary for the completely-mixed activated sludge
system, high-pH  lime coagulation and recarbonation
study  ...........  .....  . ........ 126

Performance summary for the upflow clarifier, high-pH lime
coagulation and recarbonation study ..........  132

Process summary for the upflow clarifier, high-pH lime
coagulation and recarbonation study ..........  133

Performance summary for the recarbonation basin,  high-pH
lime coagulation and recarbonation system .......  134

Performance summary for the No. 1 multimedia filter,  high-pH
lime coagulation and recarbonation study  .  . .....
Performance summary for the No.  4 carbon column,  high-pH
lime coagulation and recarbonation  ..........  137
                                 xv

-------
                               TABLES

Number                                                           Page

 44       Activated sludge influent metals  summary,high-pH  lime
          treatment with recarbonation November 1973  -
          January 1974	143

 45       Activated sludge effluent metals  summary,high-pH  lime
          treatment with recarbonation November 1973  -
          January 1974	144

 46       Up-flow clarifier effluent metals summary,high-pH lime
          treatment with recarbonation November 1973  -
          January 1974	145

 47       Recarbonation basin effluent metals summary,high-pH  lime
          treatment with recarbonation November 1973  -
          January 1974	146

 48       Filter effluent metals summary,high-pH lime treatment
          with recarbonation November 1973  -
          January 1974 . . .	147

 49       Carbon column effluent metals summary,high-pH lime
          treatment with recarbonation November 1973 -
          January 1974	148

 50       Activated sludge influent, June 1972 through
          January 1974	167

 51       Hydraulic and process control for the activated
          sludge process 	  169

 52       Performance summary, No. 1 activated sludge system .  .  170

 53       Activated sludge influent metals summary June 1972 -
          January 1974	171

 54       Activated sludge effluent metals summary June 1972 -
          January 1974	172

 55       Analytical data summary  high-pH lime treatment without
          recarbonation June, August-October 1972,
          November-December  1973  	  181

 56       Analytical data summary  alum treatment November 1972 -
          October 1973  .....  	  182
                                xvi

-------
                              TABLES
Number

 57


 58



 59


 60


 61

 62

 63


 64

 65


 66

 67


 68


 69


 70


 71


 72
                                                       Page

Analytical, data summary high-pH Time treatment with
recarbonation November 1973 - January 1974 ......  183

Summary of mean concentrations, high-pH lime treatment
without recarbonation June, August-October 1972,
November-December 1973 ................  184

Summary of mean concentrations, alum treatment
November 1972 - October 1973 .............  185

Summary of mean concentrations, high-pH lime treatment
with recarbonation November 1973 - January 1974  ...  186

Summary of mean train removals ............  137

Summary of median train removals ...........
Change in mean metals concentrations by chemical
treatment  ......................  203

Percent metals removal by chemical treatment .....  204

Change in mean metals concentrations
by filtration  ....................  205
Percent metals removal by filtration
206
Change in mean metals concentrations by chemical
treatment and filtration	207

Percent metals removal by chemical treatment
and filtration	208

Summary of metals removal demonstrated by chemical
treatment and filtration processes 	  210

Change in mean metal concentration by activated
carbon adsorption  	  211

Percent metals removal by. activated carbon
adsorption   	212

Change in mean metal concentration and percent
removal for the AWT processes	;	213
                               xv 11

-------
                               TABLES

Number                                                             Page

  73        Metals concentrations having linear correlation
            coefficients (r) of 0.80 or greater, high-pH lime
            treatment without recarbonation 	 214

  74        Metals concentrations having linear correlation
            coefficients (r) of 0.80 or greater, alum
            treatment	215

  75        Metals concentrations having linear correlation
            coefficients (r) of 0.80 or greater, high-pH lime
            treatment with recarbonation  	 216

  76        Percentage of samples exceeding drinking water limits . 218

  77        Comparison of observed metals removals  	 219

  78        Metals concentrations in AWT effluents as a percent of
            the maximum recommended concentration 	 220

  79        Chemical-physical analytical results, Virus Run
            Number One	224

  80        Coliphage results, Virus Run Number One 	 226

  81        Poliovirus results, Virus Run Number One  	 226

  82        Chemical-physical analytical results, Virus
            Run Number Two	228

  83        Coliphage results, Virus Run Number Two 	 230

  84        Poliovirus results, Virus Run Number Two  	 230

  85        Chemical-physical analytical results, Virus
            Run Number Three  .	232

  86        Coliphage results, Virus Run Number Three 	 233

  87        Poliovirus results, Virus Run Number Three  	 233

  88        Regrowth study results   	 234

  89        Laboratory recarbonation and regrowth study results  .  . 235
   90
Chemical-physical analytical results, Virus Run
Number Four
                                                                    237
                                xvm

-------
                                TABLES
Number
   91
   92
                                                    Page
Coliphage results, Virus Run  Number Four	   238
Poliovirus results, Virus  Run Number Four  	   238
                                 xix

-------
                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     This report is the product of cooperative effort by so many people
that individual mention becomes unfeasible.  To the entire group of Dallas
Water Utilities personnel and the Texas A&M Research Foundation members
we want to convey our gratitude for their support and cooperation.

     In particular we want to offer our thanks to Mr. Henry J.  Graeser
Director, Dallas Water Utilities, who originated the plan and inspired the
effort; and Dr. I.M. Rice, Assistant Director for'Engineering and Planning
during the program and presently the successor to Mr. Graeser as Director,
for grant preparation and financial planning in addition to general  grant
administration.
                                     xx

-------
                                 SECTION 1

                                INTRODUCTION

     As shown in Figure 1, the City of Dallas is located in the upper
Trinity River watershed of North Central Texas.  This region is naturally
water deficient, and in fact, there is only one natural lake in the whole
State of Texas.  In the upper Trinity River basin, average annual pre-
cipitation ranges from about 100 cm (40 in. ) per year in the eastern
portions to 50 cm (20 in.) .per year in the western section.  In general,
average annual precipitation and evaporation rates are about equal, and
drought periods in excess of 60 days are not uncommon.  These factors
combine to make water a very valuable respurce in North Central Texas.

     The City of Dallas derives its drinking water supply from the
extensive reservoir network shown in Figure 1.  The water supply is derived
from six reservoirs on three watersheds, with estimated safe yields for the
year 2020 indicated in Table 1.

     During the middle 1950's North Central Texas experienced a protracted
drought.  The City of Dallas investigated two alternate sources of water
to augment its dwindling supply.  One was to pump water from the highly
mineralized Red River into the existing reservoir system, and the other
was to utilize the waters of the West Fork of the Trinity River which
carry a considerable amount of pollution from the wastewater effluents
of the City of Ft. Worth and the mid-cities between Ft. Worth and Dallas.
In 1955 the thought of "drinking someone else's sewage" did not meet with
wide acceptance from either the general public or the City Council and the
decision was made to import water from the Red River.  Consequently, the
City survived the drought by utilizing the Red River over a three-year
period, but not without effect.  It has been estimated that a transient
rise in heart-disease related deaths could be attributed to the period
when water with a higher sodium content was used  (1).  A most important
point emerging from this period is that as early as 1955 a major American city
had seriously  evaluated   the  possibility of an indirect wastewater
reuse as an alternative supply of drinking water.

     With respect to total water resources management in the upper Trinity
River Basin,indirect but intentional wastewater reuse is of considerable
importance to the City of Dallas.  Both the Bachman and the Elm Fork
Purification Plants of the City of Dallas withdraw water from the Elm Fork
of the Trinity River.  Estimated water supply for the year 2020 includes
329,000 cu m per day (86.8 MGD) from Garza-Little Elm Reservoir, 38,000 cu m
per day (10.0 MGD) from Grapevine Reservoir, and 156,000 cu m per day  (41.3MGD)

-------
O

-------
TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF EXISTING WATER SUPPLY FOR'THE YEAR 2020
Reservoir and Basin
Estimate Safe Yield
                MGD
M3/day
Trinity River Basin
        Lewisvilie (Garza-Little Elm)
        Grapevine
        Ray Hubbard
        Lavon
        Return flows
329,000
38,000
210,000
38,000
156,000
                86.8
                10.0
                55.4
                10.0
                41.3
Sabine River Basin
        Tawakoni
616,000
                162.8
Neches River Basin
        Palestine
386,000
                102.0
TOTAL AVAILABLE SUPPLY
1,773,000
                468.3

-------
in return flows.  The return flows are composed exclusively of wastewater
effluents discharged approximately 33 kilometers (20 miles) upstream from
the water plant intake structures.  The return flows constitute 30 percent
of the 523,000 cu m per day (138.1 MGD) that will be used as a source of
drinking water, and represent a valuable water resource.  However, travel
time from the point of discharge to the most distant intake structure is
less than one day, allowing little time for significant natural purifica-
tion to occur.  Under these circumstances, the City of Dallas had  consid-
erable interest in water and wastewater treatment technology since it is
imperative that the public health be safeguarded.

     Bearing in mind the occasional shortages of rainfall and the conse-
quences of a prolonged drought, and knowing also that new sources of
supply are disappearing rapidly, the City of Dallas has felt for some
years that the building of new reservoirs on streams to augment the
potable water supply would eventually become economically undesirable.
The fact that eastern cities in particular have been able to produce
potable, palatable waters from rivers that have been increasingly polluted
has led to consideration that some day the actual  recycle of wastewater,
properly treated,  may actually be a means  of survival  in the semiarid
Southwest and West.
     Dallas has for several years pursued studies of wastewater and water
treatment methods that might lead to the production of potable water
completely acceptable for all uses.  Because there are technological,
legal, and esthetic considerations to be satisfied, Dallas had followed a
cautious policy.  Much more knowledge is needed on the health effects of
exposure to water containing small amounts of pollutants.  The three
general pollutant classes of concern are viruses, heavy metals, and
organics.  It is anticipated that the most stringent standard will have to
be met before Dallas can embark on a recycle program.

BACKGROUND OF THE DALLAS PROGRAM

     As a result of the previously described circumstances, namely:  1)
the consideration of using the heavily polluted West Fork of the Trinity
in 1955, 2)  the present minor indirect use of upstream effluents, and
3)  the economics dictating that maximal amounts of wastewaters be
salvaged if practical, the Dallas Water Utilities have pursued an active,
viable wastewater reuse program since June 1970.

     The Demonstration Plant of the Dallas Water Reclamation Research
Center, which is described in detail in a subsequent section of this
report, was built and brought on-line in late July 1969.  Equipment
check-out and/or modification consumed at least nine months, and the
facility was in service for almost a year before the staff considered it
to be truly operational.  Additionally, a research building was constructed
to provide laboratory capabilities for the research program and office
space for several  different Water Utilities Department activities.  The
laboratory facilities were occupied in the Spring of 1971.

-------
     The funds for construction of the laboratory and administration build-
ing were provided in part by Federal  Grant No.  WPC Tex 588.,  to the amount
of $571,093 of which the City provided 52 percent.  The Demonstration
Plant was constructed under Grant No. 17080 EKG from the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) for a total cost of $689,015 of which the City  of
Dallas provided 45 percent.

     From start-up until January 1971 the Dallas Water Reclamation Research
Center operated on additional funds provided in Grant No. 17080 EKG for
the study of various water reclamation unit processes.  The  initial phase
of the project was directed at evaluating different sequences of unit
processes to expand and up-grade the City's Central Wastewater Treatment
Plant.

     At the conclusion of these studies additional unit processes were
investigated by utilizing a number of different wastewaters  as influents
to the unit processes at the Demonstration Plant.  For the most part the
investigations were short term (2 to 4 weeks), and these data have been
presented in the Final Report for the project (2).

RESEARCH PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT

     The present project, Grant No. S-801026, was started in June 1972
and research was concluded during February 1974.  During this project
metals removal and virus removal in various advanced wastewater treatment
techniques were evaluated.  Each unit process was appraised for the re-
moval of over twenty separate metals as well as the more routine water
quality parameters related to process control and overall water quality.
During the grant period, research to ascertain the ability of various
treatment sequences to remove viruses from an activated sludge effluent
was carried out at the research center.   A series of four virus seedings
were undertaken to study virus removal through the chemical  treatment
sequence at the pilot plant.  The virus studies were jointly carried out
between the staff of the research:center and Dr.  Robert Safferman and
staff of EPA.

-------
                                  SECTION 2

                                CONCLUSIONS
     Metals that showed removals by the biological process of 45 percent or
better were: Al, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mo, Pb, Se, and Zn.  Metals that
showed poor removals (10 percent or less) were:Ag, As, B, Ca, Na, Si, and
Sr.  Intermediate removals were demonstrated by Co, Hg, K, Mg, Mn, Ni, and V.

     The biological process performed poorly in removing at least two
elements of environmental concern:  Arsenic and boron.  Hence, it is well to
consider other means of control of these substances, means which will
preclude their contamination of the environment.  The importance of monitoring
biological processes is also made obvious.

     Removal of a number of metals in the biological treatment process tested
here was strongly concentration dependent, showing increased removal with
increasing influent metal concentration.

     High-pH lime coagulation and recarbonation is more effective in removing
metals from biologically treated wastewater flows than alum coagulation.

     Removals of 50 percent or better were demonstrated for Cr, Fe, Se, Mg,
Mn, Zn, Hg, As, Al, Ni, and Pb by biological treatment plus high-pH lime
coagulation without recarbonation; for Cr, Fe, Zn,  Cu, Se, Mo, Mn, Cd, Pb,
Hg, and Ba by biological treatment plus alum coagulation; and for Cr, Se,
As, Mn, Cd, Al, Fe, Hg, Pb, Cu, and Mo by biological treatment plus high-pH
lime coagulation with recarbonation.

     Removals of 20 percent or less were shown for Sr, Si, Ag, B, Na, Co, and
Cu by biological treatment plus high-pH lime coagulation without recarbona-
tion; for Co, V, K, Na, Mg, Al, Si, B, Ag, and Ca by biological treatment
plus alum coagulation;  and for Sr, Na, B, Co, Ca, and Zn by biological
treatment plus high-pH lime coagulation with recarbonation.

     Chemical-physical  processes applied to biologically treated effluents
appeared to perform about as well  as the literature reports for them in
water treatment applications.   Alum coagulation removal  of virus was a
function of Al/P dose used.  At low Al/P doses poor virus removal occurs
even if good suspended solids  removal  takes place.

-------
     High-pH lime treatment of secondary effluents achieves very high
degrees of virus removals.  However, after recarbonation, recontamination
can occur as there is no residual viricide present.

     Biological treatment followed by high-pH lime treatment plus recarbona-
tion appeared to be the most effective of all treatments examined for
removing metals.  It was also the most effective for removing arsenic, but
boron was still relatively untouched.  The suggestion is that high-pH lime
treatment plus recarbonation is one of the more effective assemblages of
unit processes for consideration in reuse applications, but that boron
requires consideration on a case-by-case basis.

     The use of high-pH lime treatment also provided for excellent
disinfection, not only for vegetative forms of bacteria, but also for
polioviruses.  In reuse applications high-pH lime treament is highly
warranted.

Removal of animal virus and coliphage was virtually identical in the
treatment processes tested.

Carbon adsorption should not be applied to lime^coagulatec! water which
has not been recarbonated or had its pH reduced to 8.0 because the
carbon granules will cement together.

-------
                               SECTION 3

                           RECOMMENDATIONS
     Additional work appears warranted on the effect of concentration on
metals-removal performance of biological processes.  Removal of Cd, Co,
Mo, and Zn in this study appeared to be strongly related to their
concentrations.

     In general, the biological process was not efficient for metals
removal.  It is suggested that the effluents from the biological process
be periodically monitored for metals as well as BODg and suspended
solids.  If the biological process cannot do well in removing a particular
undesirable product, other means of control would be indicated.

     Additional studies of the feasibility of the use of coliphage as an
indicator or tracer of the removal of animal virus in wastewater treatment
should be conducted.

-------
                                 SECTION 4

                     DESCRIPTION OF RESEARCH FACILITIES
CITY OF DALLAS COLLECTION SYSTEM

     The sanitary sewer collection system serving the City of Dallas consists
of 5074 kilometers (3,137 mi) of gravity mains.  The lengths of mains of
different diameters are summarized in Table 2.  The best available estimates'.
indicate that the total length of laterals is between one and two times  the
length of the gravity mains, indicating a total collection system length
between 10,000 and 15,000 kilometers (6215 and 9323 mi).  The City has no
combined sewers.

     In addition to the normal domestic wastes discharged to the collection
system, the City has significant contributions from industrial  and commercial
establishments.  During fiscal year 1973 the industrial  discharges represent-
ed 12.1 percent of the total flow received at the Central  Plant.  Total
flow received during this period was 17.9 x 107 m3/yr (47.3x1O9 gal  per year).
The 221 significant industries monitored by the Water Utilities Department
discharged a total of 5.23 x 107 kg of BOD5 (1.15 x 108  Ibs) and 5.34 x 107
kg (1.17 x 107 Ibs) of total suspended solids (TSS) to the collection system
during FY 1973.

     The activities of commercial establishments including restaurants
wholesale food preparation facilities, and service facilities (principally
car washes), have substantial impact on wastewater characteristics.
Generalized information relating to the industrial and commercial discharges
are summarized in Table 3.  The predominant effect of commercial activities
is to increase the organic and solids loadings; however, certain of the
services activities (car washing) can have appreciable impact on metals
concentrations.

     The City of Dallas' Central Wastewater Treatment Plant consists of three
major sections; the Dallas Sewage Treatment Plant (STP), the White Rock STP,
and the Tertiary Treatment Complex.  Each of these components is described
in detail in subsequent paragraphs.  Both the Dallas and White Rock STP's
are older trickling filter facilities, and each plant serves a well
defined and separate portion of the City's collection system.   The plants
operate in parallel and their effluents are discharged to the Tertiary
Complex for additional treatment prior to discharge to the Trinity River.
The influent pumps for the Demonstration Plant were located at the White
Rock STP because it  is the closest source of wastewater.

-------
TABLE 2.  SIZES AND LENGTHS OF GRAVITY MAINS IN THE SANITARY SEWER
          COLLECTION SYSTEM.
         PIPE DIAMETER
                              LENGTH
    (cm)
(in)
(km)
(mi)
10.16
' 15.24
20.32
25.40
30.48
35.56
38.10
40.64
45.72
53.34
60.69
68.58
76.20
83.82
91.44
99.06
106.68
114.30
121.92
129.54
137.16
152.40
160.02
167.64
182.88
198.12
205.74
213.36
228.60
4
6
8
10
12
14
15
16
18
21
24
27
30
33
36
39
42
45
48
51
54
60
63
66
72
78
81
84
90
2.513
1814.508
1934.113
450.758
244.624
1.759
176.397
0.290
123.037
59.057
47.435
21.334
40.954
8.367
22.632
7.435
12.790
7.416
16.939
0.454
10.095
26.182
0.732
3.560
8.333
1.936
0.714
1.263
2.248
1.562
1127.724
1202.059
280.148
152.035
0.472
109.658
0.180
76.468
36.704
29.481
13.259
25.453
5.200
14.066
4.621
7.949
4.609
10.528
0.282
6.274
16.272
0.455
2.236
5.179
1.203
0.444
0.785
1.397
        Total length of mains
                      5,047.005   3,136.734
                                      10

-------



s:
i.i
oo
>-
oo

z:
o
1 — 1
1—
LU
	 1
—1
o
o
LU
1—
o
I" ™

oo
LU
CD
o:
•=£.
o
oo
1— 1
O

5;
1 — 1
o
Q;
LU
o
o

Q
§
•=C
i — i
Q^
I—
CO
33>
I__J
UU
o
>-
f¥|
^^
2^
|£>'
IZD
oo

.
co

LU
	 1
CO
^
tO r—
to *^.
CD 0)
S-^E_

X— X
r—
CO *^
co en
""•S.
Lf»—
Q *-~.
O en
co E
^
*
O
E
;"
t—
to
o^
5 *^— ^
o
LZ •
o
E
•
E
^3
u




to

O)
It- Jl
o to
•r—
&- r—
CU JO
-Q IO
E -4->
3 tO
'Z. LU










to
t- to
0 OJ
c:
0) T-
Q. to
>^ — \
1— CD
1
1
1
1



^O
CM
IQ

CO
r^
i^-

oo
o
"x
CM
OO
•
*vt*


•O
o
"x
CM
OO

•







i—
CM
CM











i—
to
T
^^
to
3
T3
C
i — i

O
CM
CO


CT>
LO
O

oo
LO
r—
























O
0
r-.
r—






to
+J
E
to
s-
f~— — s
to CO
•r- •*->
o to
S- CU
a) o:
E

O
0

co co i
00 O 1
r— CM 1


O">
oo r^. i
r-~ o i


CO OO 1
O VO 1
en CM i

oo
o
X

o

^_



IO
o
'x
^o
o^
•
CO





o
O O 0
O O CM
CM CO CM



o
•r-
tO i—
S- 10
tO CO "r-
d) Q. d) O
1—0) •!- S_
ta s- tii -p cu
tO Q- O -r- E
CU -i- r— E
i— -a > M- o
O O S- O O
-£= 0 O) tO
3: U- oo u_ i —
(O

o
h-
11

-------
     The concentrations of certain metals in the influents of the Dallas
and White Rock plants are given in Table 4.  The column headed 'combined"
is a calculated, flow-weighted concentration for all wastewatqrs  arriving
at the Central Plant which comprises both the Dallas and White Rock
plants.  Typical characteristics of raw wastewater entering the White Rock
STP are presented in Table 5.  This wastewater appears to be representative
of domestic wastewaters.  Most of the industrial waste discharges enter the
Dallas STP, and for this reason the wastewater entering the White Rock plant
is more suitable for wastewater reuse studies.

TREATMENT FACILITIES

     The Demonstration Plant of the Dallas Water Reclamation Research Center
is colocated with the White Rock Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) at the City of
Dallas' Central Wastewater Treatment Facility.  The Central Plant complex
is situated on the south bank of the Trinity River approximately five
kilometers (3 miles) south of the City's central business district.  The
Central Plant actually consists of three treatment facilities described
below, two of which are trickling filter plants.  The third facility is
completely-mixed activated sludge followed by tertiary mixed-media filtra-
tion.

Dallas Sewage Treatment Plant

     The Dallas STP is the oldest wastewater treatment facility operated
by the City of Dallas.  This single-stage, standard-rate, trickling filter
facility consists of four bar screens and grit channels, twenty-four
Imhoff tanks which are operated as primary clarifiers, two rectangular
primary clarifiers, sixteen standard-rate trickling filters which are
53 meters  (174 feet) in  diameter and three final clarifiers.

White Rock Sewage Treatment Plant

     The White Rock STP is a two-stage, high-rate trickling filter facility
without intermediate clarification.  The plant consists of two bar screens
and grit channels, six rectangular primary clarifiers, four first-stage,
high-rate  trickling filters, eight second-stage, high-rate trickling filters,
and four rectangular final clarifiers.  All trickling filters are 53 meters
(174 feet) in diameter, and contain a maximum of 2.29  meters (7.5 feet) of
media.

Tertiary Treatment Complex

     Under normal flow conditions  the effluents from  both  the Dallas and
White Rock facilities are discharged to the tertiary  treatment complex
prior to discharge into the Trinity River,  The tertiary complex consists
of twelve  completely-mixed, activated sludge  aeration  basins and twelve
final clarifiers, followed by  fourteen mixed-media  gravity filters.
                                     12

-------
TABLE 4.    INFLUENT METALS CONCENTRATIONS*  FOR FISCAL YEAR 1973

Metal
Arsenic
Barium
Boron
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc

Dallas STP
-
-
-
0.045
0.347
0.184
0.319
-
0.00208
0.193
-
-
0.675
-Concentration (mg/1
White Rock STP
-
-
-
0.0148
0.158
0.159
0.176
-
0.00103
0.118
-
-
0.191


	
Combined
-
-
_
0.
0.
0.
0.
-
0.
0.
'
-
0.



0224
205
165
212

001294
137


312
* Arithmetic means for the fiscal  year.
                                 13

-------
TABLE 5.  CHARACTERISTICS OF RAW WASTEWATER AT THE WHITE ROCK STP FOR
          THE PERIOD OF JUNE 1, 1972 THROUGH,FEBRUARY 27, 1974
     Flow


     Grit


     Total Solids

     Settleable Solids

     TSS

     BOD5

     NH3-N

     Org. N

     N02  & N03-N

     PH
316,048 mVday
(83.5 MGD)

0,0274 1/m3
(3.66 cu.ft./MG;)

912 mg/1

8.9 ml/1

241 tng/1

200 mg/1

17.4 mg/1

12.7 mg/1

0.5 mg/1

7.3
                                      14

-------
Demonstration Plant

     All influents to the Demonstration Plant are pumped from the White
Rock STP and all effluents and sludges from the pilot plant are returned
to the headworks of the White Rock plant.   As indicated in Figure 2,  there
are a total of five possible influents which can be supplied at a maximum
flow of 47.3 liter/sec (750 gpm),  with the exception of the raw sewage pump
that is rated at 18.9 liters/sec(300 gpm).  The discharges from all  pumps
are routed to a valve station at the White Rock plant, from which the flow ,
is directed to the pilot plant through one of three main influent lines.
Each influent line services one of the major treatment modules (biological,
chemical, or physical) at the Demonstration Plant.

     As indicated in Figure 3, which is a  piping diagram of the major
components of the Demonstration Plant, the facility is relatively complex  ,
and very flexible.  The following  unit processes are present at the  pilot
plant.  They are discussed in detail in the following sections of this
report, and many are identified in Figure  4 (aerial  photograph of the
Demonstration Plant).

        1. No. 1 completely-mixed  activated sludge system

        2. No. 2 completely-mixed  activated sludge system

        3. Upflow clarifier

        4. Gravity-flow, mixed-media filter

        5. Gravity-flow, dual-media filter

        6. Gravity-flow activated  carbon contactors (2 each)

        7. Chlorine contact basins (2 each)

        8. Ozone generator and contacting  system

        9. Reverse osmosis demineralization unit

       10. Ultraviolet light disinfection  unit

       11. Chemical storage and feeding equipment

No. 1 Activated Sludge System--
     The No. 1 activated sludge system consists of the No. 1 aeration basin
and the No. 1 final clarifier, and return  sludge and effluent pumps.   The
return sludge pump has a practical operating range of 6.3 to 47.3 liters/sec.
(100 to 750 gpm), while the effluent pump  has an operational range of 3.2
to 20.5 liters/sec. (50 to 325 gpm).

No. 1 Aeration Basin—
     The No. 1 aeration basin is a circular mild-steel tank erected  above
ground; technical data for this unit are summarized in Table 6.  Figure 5

                                     15

-------
o

o
O-

fe
I—I
Q-
                                                                         a.

                                                                         h-
                                                                         o
                                                                                  cc
                                                                         _1 U_ Q ^5
                                                                         HH a. z: — i
                                                                         Q- UJ 
                                                                                                -1-5
                                                                                                jr
                                                                                                3

                                                                                                 O)
                                                                                                 to
                                                                                                 al
                                                                                                 D-

                                                                                                 OJ

                                                                                                 •P

                                                                                                 S-
                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                 q-
                                                                                                  O)
                                                                                                 E -P

                                                                                                 >rr 
o to
                                                                                                  a>
                                                                                                 10 
-------
                                                             D-

                                                             O
                                                             cu
                                                             OJ
                                                             o
                                                             o

                                                             (O
                                                             O)
                                                             10
                                                             QJ
                                                              o


                                                              rd
                                                              o
                                                              QJ
                                                              
                                                              rcS
                                                              rd
                                                             Q
                                                              OJ
.17

-------
                                                                 4->
                                                                 E
                                                                 fC

                                                                 D.
                                                                 rc
                                                                Q


                                                                 CU
                                                                 Q.
                                                                 ro

                                                                 en
                                                                 o
                                                                 (C
                                                                •i—
                                                                 s-
                                                                 HI
                                                                 S-
18

-------
TABLE 6.  TECHNICAL DATA FOR THE NO. ITERATION BASIN.
   Di ameter


   Depth


   Volume
   Theoretical Residence Time at
   6.3 liters/sec (100 gpm)

   Total Nameplate Power Input
       Maximum Power Level
       Air  Flow
7.62 m
(25.0 ft.)

3.66 m
(12.0 ft.)

170,343 liters
(45,000 gal.)

560.2 m3  o
(6,030 ft. )
7.5 hours

29.8 kw
(40 HP)

0.053 kw/m3

(0.89 HP per 1000
 gal.)

(6.64 HP per 1000
 ft.3)

118 or 236 liters/
sec

(250 or 500 scfm)
                                      19

-------
20

-------
 indicates  the  major  structural  features of  interest.

      Several different  types  of mixing and  oxygen transfer equipment have
 been evaluated in  this  basin.   Aquarius,  Inc. supplied the Fiscalin system,
 which was  operated throughout most of this  grant. As shown in Figure 5, the
 Fiscalin system consisted mainly  of  a center draft tube, a submersible,
 pump within the draft tube, and the  Fiscalin flow element at the bottom
 of the draft tube.  The submerged pump pumped the mixed liquor down the
 draft tube through the  Fiscalin flow element, which would divert the flow
 into the rest  of the tank.  Oxygen transfer was accomplished by injecting
 air into the draft tube at  four points below the pump.  The Fiscalin
 flow element created a  high shear area which resulted in the formation of
 very small  air bubbles.

 No. 1 Final Clarifier--
      The No. 1 final  clarifier  is a  circular, mild-steel basin erected   ,
 above ground.   As  initially provided by Rex Chainbelt, the unit had
 peripheral  feed and  square  effluent  weirs in the center of the tank.
 This unit was  not  originally  equipped with  a surface skimmer, and the center
 effluent weir  configuration made  addition of a skimmer, quite complex.
 Therefore, the basin was modified by removing the center effluent weirs and
 bolting a new  peripheral effluent weir to the inside of the existing influ-
 ent baffle skirt.  A skimmer  and  scum collector were then fitted to the
 basin. These  modifications are shown in  Figure 6  .

      Sludge is removed  by  the head differential between the water surface
 in the clarifier and the return sludge pump well, via a
 header. .Technical data for this  clarifier  are presented in Table 7.

 No. 2 Activated Sludge  System—                             -
      The No. 2 activated sludge system consists of the 28.4 m  (7,500 gal)
 completely-mixed aeration  basin,  and a three-hopper Smith and Lovelace
 final clarifier with a  sidewater  depth of 3.66 m (12.0 ft.).  Mixing and
 oxygen transfer is effected by  diffusers, and the maximum air flow is
 53.8 liters/sec (144 scfm).

 Upflow Clarifier--
      An Infilco Densator,  shown in Figure?, is the chemical treatment
 unit used at the Demonstration  Plant.  The  unit consists of the main tank,
 S.5 m (18 ft.) in  diameter  and  5.48  m  (18 ft.) deep, and an inner cylinder
 that serves as the rapid mixing and  flocculation zones.  Influent enters the
 top of the inner cylinder,  and  the annul us  between the inner cylinder
.and the main tank  serves as the upflow clarification compartment.

      Energy input  for mixing  and  flocculation is supplied via independent
 turbine-type mixers, each  of  which is equipped with a U.S. Electric
 Varidrive that has a 10 to  1  turndown capability.
      A 2.54 cm x 10.16 cm (1  in.  x 4 in.)  steel
 prevent the sludge from over-compacting.   Table
 significant technical  information on the  upflow
fluidizer bar is used to
8 summarizes the more
clarifier.
                                     21

-------
                                                     o
                                                     03
                                                     O
                                                     -a
                                                     o
                                                     0)
                                                     (O
                                                     S-
                                                     a>
                                                     S-
                                                     (C

                                                     o


                                                     (O
                                                     E
                                                     •p™
                                                     u_
                                                     d)
                                                     -d
                                                     -p
                                                     o
                                                     CD
                                                     00
                                                     0)
                                                     a>
22

-------
 TABLE 7.  TECHNICAL DATA FOR THE NO.  1  FINAL CLARIFIER.
   Diameter


   Depteh


   Volume
   Surface
   Weir Length
Surface Overflow Rate at
  6.3 liters/sec (100 gpm)
Weir Loading at
  6.3 liters/sec (100 gpm)
9.14 m
(30.0 ft.)

3.66 m
(12.0 ft.)

240,373 liters
(63,500 gal.)

240.4 m3  ,
(8,480 ft. )

65.68 m2?
(707 ft/)

27.13 m
(89 ft.)
8.50 m3/m2/dax
(203.7 gpd/ftT)
20.09 mVm/day
1618 gpd/ft.)
                                     23

-------
                                            Aluminum
                                       Tubing Handrail
Figure  7.   Elevation  of the upflow clarifier.
                             24

-------
TABLE 8.  TECHNICAL DATA FOR THE UPFLOW CLARIFIER.
Rapid Mixing Zone

      Diameter
      Depth
      Surface Area
      Volume
  Residence Time at
    6.31 liters/sec
      Mixing
(100 gpm)=
2.59 meter (8.5 ft.)
0.64 meters (2.1 ft.)
5.26 sq.m. (56.6 sq.ft.)
3.35 cu.m. (886 gal.)

8.86 min.
3 to 30 rpm
Flocculation Zone

      Di ameter               =
      Depth
      Volume                 =
  Residence time at
    6.31 liters/sec (100 gpm)=
      Mixing                 =
                         2.59 meters  (8.5 ft.)
                         3.29 meters  (10.8 ft.)
                         17.3 cu.m.  (4,570 gal.)

                         45.7 min.
                         1  to 10 rpm
 Upflow Clarification Zone

      Outside diameter       :
      Inside diameter
      Volume
      Surface Area
  Overflow rate at
    6.31 liters/sec (100 gpm)=

      Weir loading at
        6.31 liters/sec
  Residence time at
    6.31 liters/sec          • =
                         5.54 meters  (18.167 ft.)
                         2.59 meters  )8.5  ft.)
                         96.8 cu.m.  (25,580 gal.)
                         18.71  sq.m.  (201.4 sq.ft.)

                         29.9 m3/m2/day
                         (717 gpd/sq.ft.)

                         33.5 m3/m/day (2,700 gpd/ft.)

                         255.8 min.
Total theoretical residence time
   at 6.31 liters/sec (100 gpm)
                         5.17 hours
                                     25

-------
Chemical Storage and Feed Equipment--
     Facilities are present at the Demonstration Plant  to store and feed
the following chemicals:

        1. Hydrated lime

        2. Hydrated aluminum sulfate

        3. Ferric chloride

        4. Dry polyelectrolytes

        5. Liquid polyelectrolytes

        6. Activated silica

        7. Powdered activated carbon

        8. Chlorine

     All coagulants and coagulant aids, with the exception of lime, can be
fed to either aeration basin or final clarifier, to the upflow clarifier,
or in front of the filters or carbon contactors for use as filtration
aids.  The lime slurry can be pumped to either of the activated sludge
systems or the upflow clarifier.

No. 1 Mixed-Media Filter—
     The No. 1 filter is shown in Figure 8 as it was initially installed
at the Demonstration Plant.  At that time the filtering media consisted
of 0.91 meters (3.0 feet) of sand overlayed with 0.30 meters (12 inches)
of anthracite.  The influent flow was split equally between the top and
bottom of the filter bed, and the effluent was withdrawn through a mid-
bed collector located 15 cm (6 inches) below the sand-anthracite
interface.  The filter performance can be characterized as having been
generally good; however, structural deficiencies with the mid-bed collector
resulted in frequent maintenance and the unit was converted to a convention-
al gravity flow filter.

     When the filter was rebuilt in December 1971 media supplied by Neptune
Microfloc was utilized and the media specifications are summarized in Table
9.  The filter has a nominal diameter of 1.22 meters (4.0 feet)  and a
surface area of 1.17 sq.m. (12.57 sq.ft.).   At a flow of 2.37 liter/sec.
(37.5 gpm) the filtration rate is 2.03 liter/sec/m2 (3  gpm/sq.ft.).   The 2
filter was normally backwashed at a flow of 12.2 liters/sec/m2 (18 gpm/ft  )
for ten minutes.   The surface wash was started two minutes prior to starting
the main backwash flow, and stopped two minutes before  the backwash was
terminated.  The surface wash flow was not measured, but a good visual
estimate is approximately 0.9 liters/second (15 gpm).

     During the course of the different research projects conducted at the
Demonstration Plant the bed expansion on the No. 1 filter was measured.

                                     26

-------
                                           L   1 >/,." ', / W , ///'
                                        6" Backwash  Drain
                                                       (All  Tank  \
                                                       } Connections
                                                        To  Have   \
                                                        Reinforcing \
                                                        Plates Per  \^
                                                       / API  Standards J
Figure  8.   Typical  elevation  of the No.  1  and No.  2  gravity filters.
                               27

-------














a;
LU
_i
i— i
Lu
l-H
O
LU
s:
a
LU
X
i — i
s
r—

•
o
•z.

LU
I—

O
to-

co
o
1— 1
I—
^£
0
l-H
i 1
H- 1
o
LU
CU
CO
<=c
1 — 1
Q
LU
ricE.

•
C7»

LU
L ]
ca
 *~*
E E c
•1— 'I— T—

CO CO OJ

E E E
o o o

OJ OJ OO
vo *^ o
• • •
r-* i-- LO

E E—-
o o •
c:
1-^ LO -r-
CM CO
r— .-^,. , — ,
O •— E •
O O C
•POO -i-
•P -P LO
LO CO •*
o r-* oj vo ~^
en oj - — • i —
• i— O V











r—
CU
, ^>
(O
S-
s: CD




r-~ CM
r— OJ
r— - i— •



1 1

r^^ r^«»
CO CM

0 O


	 	 s
•
c
^^ •!-
E LO
•r— •
^~
CO — '
"^ E

(j
CO
OJ >*
CD •
• |_—
r^> t—

















i—
rT
oo r>«
s: i
CO
ft ^^
n £L.
CO

S- CU
(O C.
-P 0 -t-
CU 0 Lu
E
S-
ro
CD




CM
co
,_!



E

r-*
"^d"
•
0


f 	 s
•
E
•r=
LO
•
cn
— '
E
O

CO
P—
•
«^-
OJ






















r—
1
CO
s:

n
X!
E
ro
CO




LO
CO
1 —



§

LO
o

•—



s-^
•
E
"r~
OJ
OJ
— t
E
o

00
CO

LO
LO

















cn
r— •
CO


CU
•p
•1—
o
(O

-E
•P
E











1/>
CU

O
E
•r—
co

e

to
o
cn
CTi

u
ro
•r—
-a
CU
s:

s-
cu
-p
•I—
Lu

Cf_
O

-p
a.
CU
a

P_
rO
•P
O
h—
















28

-------
These data were obtained at different backwash flows and water temperatures
and are presented in Figure 3.  The effect of backwash water temperature
on bed expansion is clear, and can be directly attributed to decreased
viscosity of the backwash water at the higher temperatures.

     It should be noted that during the summer, wastewater temperatures
approaching 30 C are not uncommon in the South and Southwest.   The data
presented in Figure 9 suggest that backwash water pumps and distribution
systems, in regions with high water temperatures, should be designed for
flows that are significantly higher than conventional design flows of 10
to 13.5 liters/sec/m^ (15 to 20 gpm/ft^).

No. 2 Dual-Media Filter-
     Structurally, the No. 2 filter is almost identical to the No.  1  filter,
and this unit is also operated in the conventional gravity-flow mode.
Media consist of 30.48 cm (12 inches) of sand with a 60.96 cm (24  inches)
anthracite cap.  The filter sand has an effective size of 0.57 mm  and a
uniformity coefficient of 1.6, and the anthracite an effective size
of 0.96 mm and a uniformity coefficient of 1.5.  Air scour is  normally
used prior to backwash at a rate of 20.2 liters per sec. per sq.m. (4 scfm
per sq.ft.).

Activated Carbon Contactors—
     Both the No. 3 and No. 4 columns at the Demonstration Plant serve as
granular activated carbon contactors, and construction details are shown
in Figure 10  Both units are 1.22 meters (4.0 feet) in diameter and use a
3.05 meter (10.0 foot) charge of carbon, or 2000 kg (4400 Ibs.) at a bulk
density of 0.56 kg per liter (35 Ibs. per cu.ft.).  The carbon contactors
use the same air scrubbing system for backwashing as the No.  2 filter.
Calgon Filtrasorb 300, 8x30 mesh activated carbon was used throughout the
study.

Chlorine Contact Basins—
     The Demonstration Plant has two chlorine contact basins which may be
operated in parallel  or in series.  Each basin is 5.49 meters  (18.0 feet)
long, 2.26 meters (7.41  feet)  wide,  and 0.48 meters (1.58 feet) deep.   Each
basin has a volume of 5.95 cu.m. (1573 gal.), which results in a theoretical
residence time of 15.7 minutes at a  flow of 6.31  liters per sec.  (100 gpm).
Eleven fiberglass baffles were installed in each basin, such  that  plug flow
would be closely approximated.  Dye  studies have been used to  quantify the
hydraulic charateristics of the end-around baffling system, and observed
residence time distribution functions closely approximate theoretical
values.   The chlorination equipment  is capable of a maximum feed of 22.7
kg (50 Ibs.) of chlorine per day.
                                    29

-------
                      NOISNVdXH 039  !N3DH3d
o
LO
LO
co
o
CO
                                CXJ
o
CM
                                             LO
-o
 c
 (O  •

 O) CU

 :3 1—

 to q^


 Q.-I-

 oi cu
                                                                                c:
                                                                                o
                                                                                o
                                                                                c:  o
                                                                                   CU
                                                                                to JT
                                                                                  +J
                                                                                c/)
                                                                                (d  S-
                                                                                   o
                                                                                E M-
                                                                                O
                                                                               •i-  QJ
                                                                                CO -4->
                                                                                C  ea
                                                                                to  i-
                                                                                cx
                                                                                X -E
                                                                                O)  to
                                                                                   fO
                                                                                to  3
                                                                               •i- _^:
                                                                               -a  o
                                                                                cu  *
                                                                                CTl
                                                                                cu
                                                                                S-
 i-n
               CO
                       CO
                             LO
                             OJ
                  CD
                  CM
                                                   o
                               'NOISNVdX3  038
                                       30

-------
                                                         Top Of Ftlt«r
                                                            E lev. 413.33
-
-------
                                 SECTION 5

                     SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
     The sampling procedures described below were utilized for the duration
of this research effort.  Samples for routine wet chemistry and metals
analyses were collected by the operators on duty at the Demonstration Plant,
and samples for microbiology were collected by microbiology laboratory
technicians.

Routine Chemistry Samples

     Samples for routine wet chemistry analyses were collected by the
plant operators seven days a week at 1:00 am, 5:00am, 9:00am,  l:00pm,
5:00pm, and 9:00pm.  Wide-mouth, half-pint plastic bottles were used for
sample collection.  These sample bottles were placed in a refrigerator  until
transported to the laboratory, at which time they were composited by the
staff chemists.  Since the Demonstration Plant was operated at hydraulic
steady-state, equal volumes (400 ml) of each of the six grab samples were
used for the 24-hour composite sample.

Metals Samples

     Samples for metals determinations were collected by the plant operators
at the same time samples for routine analyses were collected.   Four-hundred
milliliter fractions were composited in one-gallon amber bottles to which
redistilled nitric acid (10 ml per liter) had been previously added for
sample preservation.

Microbiological Samples

     Either the staff microbiologist or the microbiology laboratory tech-
nicians collected all samples for microbiological evaluation.   The samples
were collected in 125 ml, wide-mouth glass bottles with glass stoppers
that had been previously dry sterilized at 177°C for one hour.

Sampling Frequency

     Most of the more conventional water quality parameters that had process
control significance were evaluated daily on 24-hour composite samples.
Those parameters necessary for general background information, such as   -->'-.
                                     32

-------
chlorides and sulfates, were evaluated on weekly composite samples.
Samples were collected for  metals analyses every other day.

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

     The analytical procedure .used in this research effort followed the
13th Edition of Standard Methods for the Examination of_ Water and Wastewater
in so far as practicable (3).

Flow

    The influent flows to all unit processes, with the exception of the
recarbonation basin, were measured by BIF/Brooks magnetic flow meters.   This
combination of meters and recorders proved to be unreliable, and instrumen-
tation technicians found it impossible to keep the flow meters properly
calibrated and maintained.   These problems resulted in the installation of
several physical flow measuring elements such as orifices, weirs and
venturi sections in order that accurate flow measurements could be obtained.

Chemical Oxygen^ Demand

     The following procedures were utilized to determine COD values on  the
routine samples.  The low-level technique was employed for those samples
where the COD was expected to be less than 50 mg/1.

High-Level Technique—•
     The procedure used was as described in Section 220 of Standard Methods.

Low-Level Technique—
     The COD of low-level samples was determined by using the procedure
given on page 19 of Methods for Chemical Analyses of_ Water and Wastes 1971
(4).  Two modifications were made to the procedure.  The amount of mercuric
sulfate was reduced from 1.0 to 0.4 grams, and the ferrous ammonium sulfate
solution was 0.01 N instead of 0.025N.

Total Organic Carbon

     All total organic carbon determinations were made using a Beckman  Model
915 Total Carbon Analyzer.

Total Residue

     Total solids determinations were made by employing the procedure in
Section 224A of Standard Methods.

Nonfiltrable Residue

     Total suspended solids determinations were made by employing the
procedure in Section 224C of Standard Methods using 2.4 cm diameter
glass-fiber filters and Gooch crucibles.
                                     33

-------
Total Dissolved Solids

     Total dissolved solids were computed by subtracting the nonfiltrable
residue from the total residue.

Total Phosphorus
     The single reagent method given in Methods for Chemical  Analyses of
Water and Hastes 1971 was used for all total phosphorus determinations.
The amount of ammonium persulfate used was increased from 0.4 to 0.5 grams,
and the amount of combined reagent was increased from 8 ml  to 10 ml.

Ammonia Nitrogen

     Ammonia nitrogen determinations were made by using an  ion-specific
electrode and the Known Addition Method (5).  The electrode used was an
Orion Model 95-10.

Total Kjeldahl and Organic Nitrogen

     Total Kheldahl nitrogen was determined by using an ion-specific
electrode and the Known Addition Method after completing the digestion
phase of the procedure given in Section 216 of Standard Methods.  Organic
nitrogen was determined by subtracting the ammonia nitrogen from the
total Kheldahl nitrogen.

Nitrite Nitrogen

     Nitrite nitrogen determinations were made using the procedure described
in Section 134 of Standard Methods.

Nitrate Nitrogen

     The phenoldisulfonic acid method, Section 213D of Standard Methods,
was used to determine combined nitrite-nitrate nitrogen.

Sulfate

     Sulfate was determined by an indirect atomic absorption spectroscopy
method by adding a known concentration of barium chloride to form a barium
sulfate precipitate.  The barium concentration in solution  was then
determined by atomic absorption, and the sulfate concentration determined by
subtraction, as outlined in the Perkin-Elmer Applications Manual.

Chloride

     Chloride concentrations were determined by the mercuric nitrate method
described in Section 112B of Standard Methods.
                                     34

-------
Alkalinity

     Total and phenolphthalein alkalinity was determined by using the
procedures given in Section 102 of Standard Methods using methyl  orange
and phenolphthalein.

Turbidity

     Turbidity was determined by the nephelometric method described in
Section 163A of Standard Methods with a Hach Model 2100A Turbidimeter.
The standard references were formazin polymer suspensions.

Color

     Color determinations were made by plant operators using a Hellige
Aqua Tester and platinum-cobalt color disk.

Metals Determinations

     Samples for metals analyses were filtered through a glass fiber filter
and then concentrated by a factor of ten.  Concentration was accomplished
by heating (below the boiling point) a 500 ml sample until the volume was
reduced to less than 50 ml, and then making up to volume in a 50 ml
volumetric flask.

Atomic Absorption—
     Atomic absorption spectroscopy was utilized to determine the concen-
trations of aluminum, barium, cadmium, calcium, cobalt, copper, chromium,
iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, silver, strontium, and zinc.  A Perkin-
Elmer Model 403 was used for these analyses, and standard procedures
given in the Perkin-Elmer Operator's Manual (6) and Standard Methods were
employed.

Flame Emission—
     Sodium and potassium concentrations were determined by flame emission
spectrophotometry by operating the PE 403 in that mode, and using methods
given in Standard Methods.
Arseni c—
     Arsenic concentrations were determined
thiocarbamate   method presented in Section
                             by using the silver diethyldi -
                             104A of Standard Methods.
Boron--
     The curcumin method given in Section 107A of Standard Methods was used
to determine boron concentrations, with an ion-exchange modification to re-
move cationic interferences.
Beryllium—
     The morin
ations.
fluorometric method (7) was  employed for beryllium determin-
                                     35

-------
Mercury--
     Mercury concentrations were determined by the flame!ess atomic
absorption method with a Perkin-Elmer Model 290B atomic absorption
spectrophotometer.

Molybdenum—
     The dithiol method of Brown, et al.  (8) was used to determine
molybdenum concentrations.

Selenium--
     Selenium concentrations were determined by employing the diaminobenzi-
dine method given in Section 150A of Standard Methods.

Silica—
     Silica determinations were made by using the heteropoly blue method
given in Section 151C of Standard Methods.

Vanadium—
     The catalytic oxidation method presented by Brown, et. al.  (U.S.
Geological Survey) was used to determine vanadium concentrations (8).

VIRUS DETERMINATIONS

     When the virus studies were first conceived, it was thought that surplus
stocks of vaccine strains of poliovirus could be purchased for use in
seeding the various unit processes,  The grant which funded the studies pro-
vided the assistance of the National Environmental Research Center (NERC)
virology program in Cincinnati. NERC was  supposed to help by obtaining the
viruses, preparing and titering the stocks for seeding, and processing the
samples from the experiments, thus performing the key functions.  The price
quotations NERC received for the attenuated viruses were prohibitive, and
NERC had to resort to its own resources for growing the viruses.

Stock

     The stock culture used for  the  virus  study  were  the Poliovirus  type  I
(vaccine strain), f2 Coliphage, and _E_. coli K12  (f+) indicator cells.

Poliovirus Assay

    One- to four-liter samples were collected during the experimental runs in
gas-sterilized flexible Cubitainers, capped, and placed in ice.  The samples
were shipped by air in insulated boxes containing ice pre-frozen in water-
tight quart-size Cubitainers, and arrived  in Cincinnati the same night
(except for the last shipment -- run No. 4, which did not arrive until noon
the following day in spite  of all possible efforts to insure prompt handling).
The shipments were picked up at the airport and  taken to the NERC
Cincinnati laboratory by EPA personnel.  All samples  (except sludge) were
Swinny-filtered with 0.45 y Mi Hi pore  filter membranes treated with Tween
80  and then inoculated onto BGM  (Barren Green Monkey  Kidney tissue) cell
                                     36

-------
 lines  using  1/2 ml  in each of 4 bottles for each  dilution.   For sludge
 samples, approximately 200 ml of sample was centrifuged and a 15 gram
 portion of the centrate placed in a beaker.  To this residue was added 40 ml
 of  10  percent buffered beef extract (Oxoid, Lab Lemco Powder, Flow Labora-
 tory,  Rockville, Maryland) which was mixed for 30 minutes on a magnetic
  mixer and  then Swinny filtered with a 0.45 u Mi Hi pore membrane.  All
 of  the filtrate was then inoculated onto BGM cell lines using 1 ml per
 bottle (approximately 40 bottles).

 Coliphage Media

     The coliphage media consisted of three substances:  Tryptone broth,
 tryptone overlay agar, and tryptone plating agar.  The tryptone broth
 consisted of 10 rag/1 of Tryptone (Difco 0123), 1.0 g/1 of yeast extract
 (Difco 0127), 1.0 g/1 of glucose, 8.0 g/1 NaCl, and 0.22 g/1 of CaCl?.
 Tryptone overlay agar was the same as tryptone broth with the addition
 of  7.0 g/1 agar (Difco 0140).  Tryptone plating agar was the same as
 tryptone broth with the addition of 15 g/1 of agar.  The salt diluent was
 8.5 g/1 CaCl and 0.22 g/1 CaCl2.  Media and diluent were sterilized by
autoclaving at 15 psi and 121°C for 15 minutes.   Glassware was  sterilized
 in a hot air sterilizer at 170°C for two hours.

 Coliphage seed

     An overnight culture of IE. coli K12 (f+)  was diluted 1:100 in one
 liter  of tryptone broth.  The culture was grown on a shaker at  37°C to an
optical density of 0.2-0.3 which was approximately 108 cells/ml.   The
 culture was  infected with f2 coliphage at a multiplicity of infection (MOI)
of 3,  and grown for 4-6 hours longer on the shaker.  Twenty to  thirty
milliliters of chloroform were added and it was  refrigerated overnight.
The following day,  the culture was centrifuged at 16,000 G for  20 minutes
at 4°C to remove cellular debris.   The supernatant yielded a stock suspension
with a titer of at least 1  x 1011  pfu/ml.

Coliphage Assay

     Samples of 10 ml  were collected and 1/2 ml  chloroform was  added
immediately.   The samples were stored in a refrigerator overnight.   The
next day, the following procedure  was  utilized.   To sterile aluminum-capped
tubes  in a 47°C water bath,  the following mixture was  added: 2.5  ml molten
tryptone overlay agar,  2.0 ml  of IE.  coli K12 indicator cells diluted
in .tryptone broth to a concentration of lO7 cells/ml,  and 0.5 ml  of sample
containing the phage or,  if nece'ssary,  0.5 ml  of a 10-fold serial  dilution.
Salt diluent was used to make the  sample dilutions.  The tube contents were
mixed on  a vortex mixer.   Contents were poured onto a  petri  plate containing
20 ml  of solidified tryptone plating agar.   The  plate  was swirled to evenly
distribute the overlay agar and then allowed to  solidify.  The  plates were
inverted and incubated 18 hours at 37°C.  Plaques were then counted and the
titer calculated.

     According to the Health Department requirements,  all  workers were
immunized against polio.

                                     37

-------
                                 SECTION VI

                         HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION
GENERAL
     During the first phase in the investigation of metals  removals, the
Demonstration Plant process configuration was as shown in  Figure 11 .
The upflow clarifier (Infilco Densator)  was operated as a  high-pH  lime
coagulation process in this portion of the project, and the target effluent
pH range was 11.3 to 11.5.  Work commenced in June 1972 and terminated
in October 1972, but was resumed briefly in November and December  of  1973.
The month of July 1972 was excluded because of a change in  process configura-
tion, hence, the exact dates for investigation of high-pH  lime  coagulation
without recarbonation were: June 1-31, August 1-October 31, 1972 and
November 2-December 9, 1973.

     During the first three months, i.e., June through August,  the sludge
age in the activated sludge system averaged slightly less  than  5 days,
allowing only partial nitrification.  However following installation  of
the Fiscalin aeration equipment and another air compressor  in the  first
week of August, the ability to nitrify was greatly enhanced, and  almost
complete nitrification was maintained thereafter.

     The multimedia filters were operated at an average rate of 6.11 m/hr.
(2.5 gpm/ft ).  The No. 1  (Neptune-Microfloc tri-media) and the No. 2
(conventional dual-media) filters were alternated during this project.   One
filter processed the activated sludge effluent, while the other filtered
the effluent from the chemical treatment process.  The No.  1 filter provided
the higher degree of suspended solids and turbidity removal, although the
performance of either filter was sufficient to produce a product water
wi
fi
Co
mi
th turbidities less than 2 NTU, when a properly coagulated effluent was
Itered.  Flow from the filter was then pumped through  one  of  the  two
rbon columns, which provided a theoretical  empty-bed contact  time of  37
nutes.
     A water quality summary for the high-pH lime coagulation sequence is
presented on Table 10.  In spite of large reductions in the concentrations
of various pollutants, there were net increases in TDS, specific conductance,
alkalinity, N02 and NO--N.  As discussed later in this section, increases
were also observed in the concentrations of some metals.

     One important aspect of the high-pH lime train was that no effort was
made to recarbonate or otherwise neutralize the Densator effluent.  The
                                     38

-------
   TABLE 10.  SUMMARY  OF WATER  QUALITY  DATA  FOR THE HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION
              STUDY
Parameter
COD
BOD5
TSS
SC,umho/cm
TDS
NH3-N
Org-N
N02+N03-N
pH, units
T.-Alk.(as CaC03)
P-Alk.(as CaC03)
Std. Plate Count
(per ml)
Total Coliforms
(per 100 ml )
Fecal Coliforms
(per 100 ml)
White Rock STP
Raw Wastewater
(mg/1 )
574
233
254
820
532
20.9
13.9
0.5
7.3
214
0
--
--
—
Final Product
(mg/1)
16
3
7
1349
642
3.7
1.8
9.4
11.5
253
228
6
<2
<2
Removal
(mg/1 )
97.2
98.7
97.2
N/A
N/A
82.3
87.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
**
N/A =Not applicable
— = Not available
                                      40

-------
                                                o
                                              . .0

                                                

                                               "•p *~
                                                (O S-
                                               r— O)
                                                3 XI
                                                o  o
                                                U  O)
                                                   o
                                                CL)  I
                                                £  S-
                                               •r-  0)
                                               "T"  
                                                 I   O
                                               -c z:
                                                o>

                                              ' 3C CM
                                                o  s-
                                                •r-  O)
                                                4J J3
                                                
                                                3  O
                                                C7>O
                                                O  3
                                                O  CD
                                                to
                                                O)   •»
                                                00)
                                                O  E
                                                S-  3
                                                D- --3
                                                O)
39

-------
scaling tendency of this water was far less than anticipated, although
ultimate neutralization would undoubtedly be a requirement in any similar
full-scale facility.

     The bactericidal effect of the high-pH lime process is evident from the
final  product water quality of Table 10. No bacteriological counts were run
on the White  Rock raw wastewater; we considered such an exercise to be
unecessarily  redundant.  In becoming final product waters, the only disin-
fection process to which the wastewaters were subjected was the high-pH
process.

     The treatment sequence generally performed very well, and product
water quality was consistently good.  The COD values observed in the un-
treated wastewaters entering the White Rock STP and the product water at
the Demonstration Plant are shown in Figure 12.

     The improvement in water quality is evident.   Product water COD values
were stable and ranged from 0 to 25 mg/1 after the early part of August 1972.

     Figure 13 is a time-series plot of the effluent nitrogen concentrations
(except organic nitrogen) observed during the high-pH lime coagulation por-
tion of the research effort.  It is important to note the  lower and more
stable COD values that result when nitrification is well advanced.   The
observed COD concentrations were low during the months  of August-September
1972 and October, 1973.  At those times nitrification was well  established;
however, during June 1972 product water COD concentrations as high  as  40 mg/1
were observed when nitrification was erratic.

COMPLETELY-MIXED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM

     The performance of the No.  1  completely-mixed activated  sludge (CMAS)
system is summarized in Table 11.   The performance of the process  can  be
characterized as satisfactory, but not outstanding.  BOD5 and TSS  concentra-
tions in the effluent averaged 28 and 27 mg/1,  respectively;  however,  the
effluent COD averaged 91  mg/1   which was about twice the desired COD con-
centration of 50 mg/1.

     Nitrification was  not consistent,  as the  average of 4.4  mg/1 of NHo-N
in the effluent indicates.   Likewise,  the effluent nitrite-nitrate  nitrogen
concentration was lower than one would obtain  from a process  that was  achiev-
ing complete nitrification.  The lack of a stable,  nitrifying microbial
population accounts for the high NH3-N concentrations,  and indirectly  result-
ed in high  effluent COD concentrations.

     Table 12 summarizes  the hydraulic operation of the system and  more
significant process control parameters.   The  hydraulic  operation of the
clarifier is very conservative by  conventional  design criteria,  but it is
a small basin that was  being operated on a nitrifying system.   Under these
conditions conservative design and operation are necessary if adequate
liquid/solids separation  is to occur.

    Although  the combination of a sludge age of 5 days  and a temperature of

                                    41

-------
400
300
200
 100
                          WhiteRock
                         Raw Wastewater
       JUNE
AUG       SEPT

     .1972
OCT
DEC
                                                  1973
Figure 12.  Raw wastewater and product water COD values observed
            during the high-pH lime coagulation study.
                                42

-------
UJ
o
o
o
J:UNE
                    Effluent N
                               c.


                    Effluent NH3-N



                    Effluent COD
                                                        &  N03-N
AU6
                                SEPT
OCT
                            1972
NOV
                       1973
       Figure 13.   Effluent nitrogen concentrations observed

                   during the high-pH lime coagulation study.
                              43

-------
TABLE 11.   PERFORMANCE SUMMARY OF THE COMPLETELY MIXED ACTIVATED
            SLUDGE SYSTEM HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION STUDY.

Parameter
COD
TOC, Soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SC,ymho/cm
NH3-N
Org.-N
N02+N03-N
N02-N
Total -P
pH, units
T-Alk.(as CaC03)
P-Alk.(as CaC03)
Std. Plate Count
(per ml )
Total Coliforms
(per/100 ml)
Fecal Coliforms
( per 100 ml)
Activated
Sludge Influent*
(mg/1)
273
42
88
124
532
819
16.1
9.5
0.77
0.06
11.0
7.3
210
0
5.2xl06
6.2xl07
6.3xl06

Activated
Sludge Effluent
(mg/1)
91
19
28
27
541
739
4.4
4.9
8.2
0.59
9.5
7.1
114
0
2.0xl05
1.4xl06
S.OxlO4

Reduction
(percent)
66.7
54.8
68.2
78.2
N/A**
9.8
72.7
48.4
N/A**
N/A**
13.6
N/A**
45.7
N/A**
96.1
97.7
98.7

*White Rock effluent.
**N/A = not applicable.
                                    44

-------
TABLE 12.   PROCESS SUMMARY OF THE COMPLETELY-MIXED ACTIVATED SLUDGE
            SYSTEM, HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION STUDY.
HYDRAULIC OPERATION
FLOW (Influent)

FLOW (Return)

FLOW (Waste)

     Aeration T
     Clarifier overflow rate

     Weir loading

     Clarifier T
11.7 I/sec
(185 gpm)
12.0 I/sec
(191 gpm)
12.3 m3/day
(3271 gpd)
1.62 hour
15.4 m3/day/m2
(377 gal/day/ft2)
      3
36.3 m /day-m
(2927 gal/ft-day)
2.30 hours
PROCESS CONTROLS
     MLSS
     MLVSS
     RAS
     SVI
     Air supplied
     D.O.
     D.O. Uptake rate
     F/M (COD)
     F/M (SOC)
     F/M (BOD)
     Sludge Age
     Temperature
2815 mg/1
2136 mg/1
5533 mg/1
186 mg/1
181. 72 I/sec
(385 cfm)
2.8 mg/1
25.3 mg/l-hr
0.574 day"1
0.088 day"1
0.185 day"1
5.0 days
28.3°C
                                    45

-------
                            The
                             This
30°C should have been sufficient for promoting the growth of nitrifying
organisms, ammonia oxidation was mediocre.   It is possible that increasing
the mean sludge age to approximately 8 days would have significantly
improved the stability of the nitrification process.

     The return sludge flow averaged 103 percent of the influent flow.   The
high return rate was used to keep the sludge blanket in the final  clarifier
 as shallow as possible so that the effects of uncontrolled denitrification
could be minimized.  Additionally, many months of operation of the activated
sludge system at the Demonstration Plant  led to the conclusion that the
best performance was obtained at a one to one recycle ratio.

UPFLOW CLARIFIER

     The up-flow clarifier (Infilco Densator) performed as expected during
the high-pH lime coagulation study.  Process control  and operating variables
of most interest are presented in Table 13, and the performance of the
process is summarized in Table 14.

     An average lime dose of 425 mg/1 (as CaO) was required to raise the
activated sludge effluent to a pH of 11.5, and a ferric chloride dose
of 16 mg/1 was applied as a flocculation aid.  The clarifier was operated at
a conventional overflow rate of 29.0 rtrVday-m^ (713 gal/day-ft^)
results were good, except that the effluent TSS averaged 46 mg/1.  IT
is higher than desired, although it had no significant impact on the
subsequent filtration process.  The effluent solids  contained almost no
volatile matter, which indicated that the solids carryover from the activat-
ed sludge system was removed in the up-flow clarifier.

     The high effluent TSS concentrations observed during this portion of
the study seemed inconsistent with the apparent quality of the water being
produced by the Densator.  The  on-line surface scatter turbidimeter during
this time generally  indicated turbidity values less than 5 JTU, and visual
examination of the water always indicated a product with good clarity.  The
high effluent TSS  concentrations can thus be attributed to post precipitation
of calcium carbonate from the high-pH effluent.

     In addition to  removing most  of the particulate organic material, the
high-pH  coagulation process  reduced the soluble TQC by 53. percent.  Further-
more the mean  organic nitrogen concentrations were reduced by 53 percent,
and the ammonia nitrogen concentration was reduced from 4.4 to 2.6 mg/1.
As expected,  increases were  observed in TDS,  specific  conductance, pH,
and alkalinity.  The effluent total phosphorus concentration averaged almost
1 mg/1, which was  higher than initially anticipated, and was attributed
mostly  to  the  carryover floe  in the effluent.

     The  microbiological data presented  in Table  14 show very clearly the
bactericidal  effectiveness  of high-pH  treatment.  Total  coliforms were
reduced by  almost  six  logs  from 1.4xlOb  to  3  per  100 ml.
46

-------
    TABLE 13.    PROCESS SUMMARY FOR THE UP-FLOW CLARIFIER, HIGH-pH
                 LIME COAGULATION STUDY
            Q   (influent)


            Q   (recycle)


            Q   (waste)


            Mixing T

                   G

            Flocculation T

                         G

            Settling T

Clarifier overflow rate


Weir loading


Lime Dose (as CaO)

FeCl3 Dose
29.1 m /day-m
(713 gal/day-ft2)

32.5 tn3/day-m
(2618~gal/ft-day)

425 mg/1

16 mg/1
             6.3 I/sec
              (100 gpm)

             1.8 I/sec
              (29 gpm)

             8387 I/day
            (2216 gpd)

             6.6 min.
                     _1
             72 sec.

             37 min.
                     -1
             95 sec.

             3.4 hours
             2
                                   47

-------
TABLE 14     PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE UPFLOW CLARIFIER,HIGH-pH LIME
             COAGULATION STUDY.
Activated
Sludge Effluent
(mg/1)
COD
TOC, Soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SC, iamho/cm
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+N03-N
N02-N
Total P
pH, units
T-Alk. (as CaC03)
P-Alk.(as CaC03)
Std. Plate Count
(per ml)
Total Col i forms
(per 100 ml)
Fecal Col i forms
(per 100 ml)
91
19
28
27
541
739
4.4
4.9
8.2
0.59
9.5
7.1
114
0
2.0xl05
1.4xl06
S.OxlO4
Densator
Effluent
(mg/I)
27
9 :
4
46
680
. 1355
2.6
2.3
9.7
0.95
0.99
11.5
265
228
13
3
'2 "
, Reduction
(percent)
70.3
52.6
85.7
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
40.9
53.1
N/A*
N/A*
23.6
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
99.9935
99.9998
99.9975
  N/A = not applicable.
                                     48

-------
MULTIMEDIA FILTERS

     The No. 1 and No. 2 filters were alternated during the project approx-
imately monthly.  During the high-pH lime coagulation portion of the study
the filters were operated as shown in Table l§  , which is the process
summary.  The influent flow averaged 1.96 I/sec (31 gal./min.), which
resulted in a filtration rate of 6.11 m/hr.   (2.5 gpm/ft2).


TABLE   15-    PROCESS SUMMARY FOR THE MULTIMEDIA FILTER, HIGH-pH LIME
              COAGULATION STUDY
Q (influent)

Surface loading

Average run time

Washwater consumption
US_

31 gpm

2.5 gpm/sq.ft.

39 hours

2.28%
METRIC

1.96 I/sec.

6.11 m/hr.
     This is a rather conservative filtration rate in terms of conventional
wastewater treatment practice, but it closely approximates American filter
operations in the water supply industry.  An average run time of 39 hours
resulted from this operation, which is very good considering the influent
TSS concentration was 46 mg/1.  The filters were backwashed when the
headless reached 10 feet.

     Performance of the filters is summarized in Table 16  , and these data
reflect anticipated performance.  Effluent TSS are higher than the 0-2 mg/1
that one should expect, but some of the solids can be explained by the  post
precipitation of calcium carbonate.  The mean total  phosphorus concentration
was reduced from 0.99 to 0.41 mg/1, almost a 60-percent reduction.

ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION SYSTEM

     During this research effort only one of the two adsorption columns at
the Demonstration Plant was in operation during any given phase of the
project.  In all cases the carbon was virgin (unused) at the start of each
of the three phases; the spent carbon in the adjacent column was removed
and replaced'With virgin"-carbon in preparation for the next part of the . •
project.

     Process operation is summarized in Table 17 , and process performance
is summarized in Table  18.   The average flow of 1.6 I/sec (25 gpm)
resulted in a surface loading of   4.89 m/hr.  (2.0  gpm/sq.ft.).   At  this
low surface loading and with an applied water that had already been filtered,
                                    49

-------
TABLE   16.  PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE MULTIMEDIA FILTERS,  HIGH-pH
            LIME COAGULATION STUDY.

Parameter
COD
TOC, Soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SCsumho/cm
NH3-N
Org.-N
N02+N03-N
N02-N
Total P
pH, units
T-Alk. (as CaC03)
P-Alk. (as CaC03)
Std. Plate Count
(per ml)
Total Col i forms
(per 100 ml)
Fecal Coliforms
(per 100 ml)
Densator
Effluent
(mg/1 )
27
9
4
46
680
1355
2.6
2.3
9.7
0.95
0.99
11.5
265
228
13
3
2

Multimedia
Filter
Effluent
(mg/1 )
28
	 **
4
12
642
1384
2.2
2.2
9.7
1.09
0.41
11.5
274
237
8
<2
<2

Reduction
(percent)
N/A*
N/A*
0.0
73.9
5.6
N/A*
15.4
4.3
0.0
N/A*
58.6
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
38
N/A*
N/A*

 *N/A = not applicable.
**— = not available
                                   50

-------
headless across the carbon column increased very slowly.   The average run
time between backwashes was 92 hours.  The average headloss at backwashing
was about 3.5 feet, therefore, the backwash of the carbon columns was
principally a function of convienience for the operating  personnel and was
not dictated by process hydraulics.


 TABLE 17.    PROCESS SUMMARY FOR THE ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION SYSTEM,
              HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION STUDY.
       Q  (influent)


       Surface loading

       Empty-bed contact time

       Average run  time

       Washwater consumption
1.61 I/sec
(25 gpm)

 4.89 m/hr.
(2.0 gpm/sq.ft.)
37 minutes

92 hours

2.01%
      The  empty-bed  contact  time of  37 minutes resulted in a COD reduction of
 almost  43 percent,  which  corresponds to a  product water COD of 16 mg/1.
 Effluent  TSS  averaged  7 mg/1, which seemed inordinately high since the water
 had been  filtered through 91.4 cm  (36 inches) of filtering media followed by
 3.1  meters (10  feet) of granular activated carbon.  Therefore, the presence
 of a TSS  concentration of 7 mg/1 in the effluent seemed very unlikely.
 The average turbidity  of  the  product water was 0.4 NTU which is not indica-
 tive of 7 mg/1  TSS.  Post precipitation of calcium carbonate in the high-pH
 effluent  was  determined to  be the  cause of the apparently high TSS values'.

      The  decrease in alkalinity that was observed across the carbon column
 is significant. After this portion of the project was concluded layers
 about 0.7 meter (2.5 ft.) thick at both the top and bottom of the column
 were found to be cemented together with calcium carbonate.  Shovels and
 picks were required to break-up the carbon for removal from the column.  The
 direct filtration or adsorption of high-pH waters was necessary, but  very
 undesirable,  during this  phase of  the project, but the alkalinity data
 did indicate  that the  problem was  developing.

      After this problem was discovered the .backwash frequency was increased
 to every  other day. Additionally,  the duration of the air scour was
 increased from 2 to 5  minutes.  Neither of these actions was sufficient  to
 break-up  the  encrusted carbon.  No increases in headloss were observed   at
 the time  the  encrustation occurred, which  indicates that the carbon's
 porosity  was  not affected significantly.
                                     51

-------
 TABLE 18.   PERFORMANCE SUMMARY  FOR THE  ACTIVATED  CARBON ADSORPTION SYSTEM,
            HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION STUDY.
Parameter
COD
TOC, Soluble
BODC
0
TSS
TDS
SCj ymho/cm
NH3-N
Org.-N
N02+N03+-N
N02-N
Total P
pH, units
T-Alk. (as CaCO
P-Alk. (as CaCO
Standard Plate
(per ml)
Total Coliforms
(per 100 ml)
Fecal Coliforms
(per 100 ml)
Multimedia
Filter
Ef f 1 uent
(mg/D
28
	 *
4
12
642
1384
2.2
2.2
9.7
1.09
0.41
11.5
3) 274
3) 237
Count 8
<2
<2
Carbon
Col umn
Effluent
(mg/1)
16
6
3
7
642
1349
3.7
1.8
9.4
1.28
0.16
11.5
253
228
6
<2
<2
Reduction
(percent)
42.9
N/A**
25.0
41.7
0.0
2.5
N/A**
18.2
3.1
N/A**
61.0
N/A**
7.7
4.0
25.0
N/A**
N/A**
**
Not available.
Not applicable.
                                    52

-------
METAL REMOVALS

     Metals data during the period of operation on lime without recarbonation
can be found in Tables 19 through 23  summarizing the activated sludge
influent, activated sludge effluent, upflow clarifier effluent, filter
effluent, and carbon column effluent samples,  respectively.

Silver

     Silver is present in Dallas'wastewater only at extremely low levels,
too low in fact to confidently assess its behavior during treatment.
Detectable amounts were measured in only 18 percent of the train influent
samples and 26 percent of the train effluent samples.  For an undetermined
reason most of the detectable silver appeared during the month of August
1972.  Silver was removed by the activated sludge, filtration, and carbon
adsorption processes, but was apparently increased by the chemical  treatment
process.  In view of the paucity of samples containing measurable concen-
trations of sjlver, it is difficult to justify the increase as being an
actual occurrence.  However, the removals perfectly balance the increase,  and
the net change through the train is zero.  At the low concentrations there
appears to be no significant removal of silver.

     The probability distributions for silver in the activated sludge
influent and the carbon column effluents are presented in Figure 14.  The
MCL  (maximum contaminant level) of the NIPDWR (National Interim Primary
Drinking Water Regulations) is also shown.

Aluminum
     Mean removals of 59 percent and 47 percent were obtained for aluminum
 through the activated sludge and chemical treatment processes, respectively.
 The apparent increase through the filter and carbon column is based on a
 single sample set collected on November 27th.  The lack of sufficient data
 for aluminum on this particular treatment sequence precludes further comment.

 Arsenic

     The slight increase in arsenic through biological treatment appears to
 be a random pattern.  The biggest removals occurred in the upflow clarifier,
 44 percent based on the mean and 61 percent based on the median.  The
 reductions were proportional to the influent concentrations  (r=0.86).

     A removal of 35 percent (mean) or 28 percent (median) occurred through
 the multimedia filter; the reduction was proportional to the influent
 concentrations (r=0.90).  A removal of only 9 percent (mean) to 14. percent
 (median) occurred through carbon filtration; ther reduction exhibiting a,
 moderate concentration effect  (r=0.53).  Overall removal of arsenic through
 the treatment train was 66 percent  (mean) and 70 percent (median).  The
 drinking water limit for arsenic of 0.05 mg/1 was exceeded on only 4 percent
 of  the train influent samples, and  none of the effluent samples.
                                    53

-------
TABLE 19.  ACTIVATED SLUDGE INFLUENT METALS SUMMARY HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION
           STUDY JUNE, AUGUST-OCTOBER 1972, NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 1973



Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.0
0.73
14.5
0.42
0.130
40.0
10.0
0.040
0.190
0.069
1.00
0.50
14.9
5.21
0.070
2.0
110.0
0.090
0.100
11.0
9.0
0.26
3.6
0.305
GEO
MEAN
0.31
0.84
14.8
0.38
0.126
43.8
9.0
0.040
0.193
0.048
1.00
0.38
14.7
5.23
0.69
2.3
107.2
0.089
0.088
8.0
9.5
0.27
4.1
0.299
ARITH
MEAN
0.62
0.92
18.7
0.39
0.149
45.0
13.3
0.045
0.209
0.138
1.05
0.53
14.7
5.27
0.071
2.5
108.8
0.104
0.100
14.2
10.0
0.27
4.6
0.323
tf

1.92
0.46
13.4
0.091
0.083
11.7
13.2
0.021
0.092
0.205
0.31
0.46
0.97
0.64
0.017
1.9
17.8
0.060
0.057
11.9
3.7
0.044
2.7
0.14
MAX

10.0
1.60
51.5
0.52
0.42
80.0
79.0
0.110
0.62
1.04
1.86
1.95
16.2
7.16
0.13
5.0
148.0
0.28
0.45
40.0
17.0
0.33
8.5
0.88
MIN

0.0
0.54
3.6
0.20
0.01
34.0
0.0
0.010
0.07
0.0
0.43
0.0
12.3
3.09
0.05
0.0
57.0
0.03
0.02
0.0
6.4
0.23
2.8
0.12
N

34
6
28
28
44
66
68
43
68
66
66
23
34
56
66
10
43
43
65
23
6
6
4
66
                     NoterO = std. deviation
                          MAX = Maximum
                          MIN = Minimum
                          N =   Number of samples
                          GEO MEAN = Geometric Mean
                          ARITH MEAN = Arithmetic Mean
Concentration in mg/1

                *yg/l
                                   54

-------
TABLE 20 ,    ACTIVATED SLUDGE EFFLUENT METALS SUMMARY HIGH-pH LIME TREATMENT
            WITHOUT RECARBONATIQN JUNE, AUGUST-OCTOBER 1972, NOVEMBER-
            DECEMBER 1973



Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.0
0.35
18.0
0.43
0.075
38.7
7.0
0.040
0.070
0.050
0.29
0.18
14.3
4.98
0.050
1.5
108.0
0.074
0.030
2.0
9.6
0.24
3.2
0.100
GEO
MEAN
0.27
0.33
12.6
0.41
0.065
41.4
6.0
0.029
0.072
0.050
0.30
0.18
14.3
4.93
0.047
1.7
106.7
0.064
0.033
1.7
9.2
0.24
3.7
0.109
ARITH
MEAN
0.26
0.38
19.5
0.42
0.079
42.5
7.6
0.037
0.085
0.080
0.34
0.29
14.3
4.97
0.051
2.1
108.1
0.082
0.044
2.4
9.6
0.24
4.2
0.123
tf

0.75
0.22
17.2
0.077
0.050
10.7
5.1
0.020
0.068
0.115
0.19
0.42
0.90
0.63
0.017
2.0
17.1
0.047
0.042
2.4
2.9
0.03
2.6
0.079
MAX

3.0
0.78
68.0
0.57
0.29
76.0
22.0
0.10
0.56
0.69
1.31
1.90
16.2
6.60
0.096
5.0
150.0
0.200
0.300
9.0
13.5
0.29
8.0
0.45
MIN

0.0
0.16
0.3
0.17
0.0
26.5
0.0
0.0
0.013
0.01
0.10
0.0
12.4
2.43
0.010
0.0
57.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.6
0.20
2.4
0.05
N

34
6
27
28
44
66
68
43
68
66
66
23
34
56
66
10
43
43
65
23
6
6
4
66
                     Concentration in  mg/1
                                   55

-------
TABLE 21-  UP-FLOW CLARIFIER EFFLUENT METALS SUMMARY HIGH-pH LIME TREATMENT
           WITHOUT RECARBONATION JUNE, AUGUST-OCTOBER 1972, NOVEMBER-
           DECEMBER 1973
          MEDIAN
GEO
MEAN
ARITH
MEAN
or
MAX
MIN
Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
o.o
0.19
7.0
0.42
0.065
153.0
7.5
0.050
0.010
0.029
0.18
0.13
14.5
0.66
0.010
3.4
110.0
0.040
0.040
0.7
13.1
0.23
3.3
0.030
0.42
0.19
6.6
0.40
0.061
148.5
5.0
0.053
0.006
0.023
0.22
0.13
14.4
0.77
0.003
3.0
114.7
0.031
0.032
1.7
12.1
0.22
3.4
0.028
0.94
0.20
10.8
0.41
0.083
156.1
7.6
0.058
0.012
0.056
0.30
0.14
14.5
0.99
0.010
4.2
117.3
0.052
0.039
1.9
13.4
0.23
3.6
0.063
2.00
0.077
11.3
0.077
0.062
49.3
5.5
0.027
0.013
0.121
0.36
0.15
1.1
0.89
0.011
3.5
27.4
0.042
0.027
2.5
6.6
0.07
1.3
0.121
10.0
0.30
46.5
0.57
0.270
313.0
20.0
0.130
0.060
0.770
2.44
0.62
17.4
4.68
0.050
11.5
200.0
0.163
0.100
10.0
20.0
0.32
5.3
0.68
0.0
0.13
0.0
0.22
0.0
53.0
0.0
0.020
0.0
0.0
0.07
0.0
12.7
0.29
0.0
1.0
82.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.2
0.15
2.6
0.0
34
4
24
27
42
64
66
41
66
64
64
23
34
54
64
10
41
41
63
23
4
4
4
64
                     Concentration in mg/1
                                      *U9/1
                                    56

-------
TABLE 22-  FILTER EFFLUENT METALS SUMMARY HIGH-pH LIME TREATMENT WITHOUT
           RECARBONATION JUNE, AUGUST-OCTOBER 1972, NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 1973



Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.0
N/A
5.0
0.43
0.070
145.5
7.0
0.050
0.005
0.037
0.07
0.065
14.3
0.46
0.0
2.0
112.0
0.030
0.030
1.75
N/A
0.22
N/A
0.030
GEO
MEAN
0.41
0.29
3.5
0.41
0.067
147.8
5.0
0.050
0.004
0.032
0.08
0.11
14.6
0.52
0.001
1.8
114.9
0.020
0.031
1.4
6.7
0.21
2.4
0.025
ARITH
MEAN
0.94
0.29
7.0
0.41
0.092
156.1
7.4
0.057
0.009
0.066
0.12
0.094
14.7
0.66
0.0061
1.7
117.1
0.042
0.040
2.04
6.7
0.23
2.4
0.048
cr

2.1
N/A
7.6
0.075
0.067
51.0
5.2
0.030
0.013
0.125
0.14
0112
1.8
0.56
0.0084
1.6
24.6
0.038
0.032
1.97
N/A
0.09
N/A
0.076
MAX

10.0
N/A
30.0
0.55
0.23
308.0
24.0
0.13
0.05
0.77
0.68
0.43
23.0
2.96
0.04
4.6
187.0
0.153
0.20
6.5
N/A
0.32
N/A
0.45
MIN

0.0
N/A
0.0
0.20
0.0
43.0
0.0
0.02
0.0
0.0
0.01
0.0
12.6
0.22
0.0
0.0
80.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
N/A
0;14
N/A
0.0
N

33
1
21
23
38
60
61
37
61
60
60
20
33
51
60
9
37
37
58
20
1
3
1
60
                     Concentration in mg/1

                                     *yg/l

                     N/A:  Not Applicable
                                   57

-------
TABLE 23.  CARBON COLUMN EFFLUENT METALS SUMMARY HIGH-pH LIME TREATMENT
           WITHOUT RECARBONATION JUNE, AUGUST-OCTOBER 1972, NOVEMBER-
           DECEMBER 1973



Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.0
N/A
4.3
0.38
0.080
138.0
7.0
0.050
0.010
0.026
0.050
0.04
14.3
0.37
0.0040
2.0
109.0
0.020
0.040
0.21
N/A
0.28
N/A
0.030
GEO
MEAN
0.37
0.36
3.1
0.37
0.072
136.2
5.0
0.047
0.005
0.027
0.05
0.10
14.4
0.45
0.002
1.8
115.0
0.013
0.035
1.0
8.8
0.22
2.9
0.018
ARITH
MEAN
0.62
0.36
6.4
0.39
0.091
144.9
7.2
0.054
0.0095
0.071
0.064
0.11
14.5
0.58
0.0067
1.9
117.5
0.029
0.043
1.00
8.8
0.23
2.9
0.041
cr

1.21
N/A
6.8
0.13
0.060
49.4
5.0
0.026
0.0103
0.149
0.045
0.17
1.4
0.53
0.0081
1.7
26.8
0.032
0.025
1.42
N/A
0.10
N/A
0.071
MAX

4.0
N/A
22.14
0.85
0.24
286.0
24.0
0.133
0.030
0.77
0.19
0.70
19.0
2.79
0.040
6.0
195.0
0.155
0.10
4.5
N/A
0.30
N/A
0.45
MIN

0.0
N/A
0.0
0.17
0.01
39.0
0.0
0.010
0.0
0.0
0.01
0.0
12.1
0.19
0.0
0.0
84.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
N/A
0.12
N/A
0.0
N

34
1
21
23
39
61
62
38
62
61
61
20
34
52
61
10
38
38
59
20
1
3
1
61
                     Concentration  in  mg/1

                                      *yg/l

                     N/A :  Not Applicable
                                  58

-------
                                               Q
                                               UJ
                                               Q
                                               UJ
                                               LU
                                               O
                                               X
                                               LlJ

                                               a;
                                               o
                                              
o
                                                     o
                                                    -o
                                              CQ     ^

                                              i     |
                                              g;     o>
                                                     (LI

                                                     =5
                                                     O1
59

-------
     Probability distributions are presented for arsenic at various points
 in the  treatment sequence in Figure 15.

 Boron

     Boron was  refractory to the high-pH lime treatment train, and the mean
 observed influent  and effluent concentrations were the same.  The only
 sustained removals occurred in the carbon column, and even then the boron
 reduction was only 6 percent (mean) or 12 percent (median).  However, virgin
 carbon  removed  more boron than partially saturated carbon. The removals were
 found to be  inversely proportional to the unit COD loading on the carbon
 (X/M value).

 Bari urn

     The greatest  barium removal occurred in the activated sludge unit, which
 achieved 47  percent  (mean) and 42 percent (median) reductions.  A slight
 increase was  noted in the Densator, the most likely source being contamina-
 tion within  the commercial hydrated lime.   Barium, a Group II element, is
 often not extracted  during the refining of  native lime.  Although the barium
 content of  the  lime  shipments was not determined, it would probably have  been
 at    least   0.05 percent, the average concentration found in the Earth's
 crust  (9).   Using  this  value, there could have been an increase of 0.21 mg/1
 barium      through the  Densator, yet the observed increase was only 0.004
 mg/1; hence,  some  removal is suggested.  There was a concentration-dependent
 reduction of barium  (r=0.55) in the upflow  clarifier at influent concentra-
 tions  greater than about 0.05 mg/1.  Removals by filtration and carbon
 adsorption  were minor,  and no significant patterns could be identified.

      Probability  distributions for treatment sequence influent and effluent
 concentrations  are presented in  Figure  16.

 Calcium

      A  large amount  of  calcium was  imparted to  the wastewater during  the
 high-pH lime treatment, and no  positive removals of any significance  were
 observed.  The  average  lime  dose of 425 mg/1 as  CaO represents a gross
 addition of approximately 303 mg/1  as  calcium.   Since the  observed increase
through  the  upflow clarifier was  114 mg/1  or 38  percent of  the amount  added,
 it would appear that the remaining  62  percent  precipitated as sludge.  A
 considerable portion of the calcium in the  Densator effluent  could have
 been present in a divalent ionic state (Ca++)  as opposed  to CaCOo, since  no
 change in the calcium concentration  occurred after  filtration.  Oddly enough,
 there was very little evidence  of scale buildup in  the  piping, filter
 plenums, pumps, etc. downstream of the Densator, with the  notable  exception
 of the granular carbon,  where  visible scale accumulation  on  the  carbon
 surface was observed.   The total  alkalinity was reduced  an average of 21
 mg/1 as  CaCOo,  and the observed decrease in calcium concentration  as  a result
 of carbon adsorption was 11.2 mg/1.   During the three-month period from
 August through October 1972, starting with  virgin  carbon,  a calculated total
 of 236 Ib.  of calcium was deposited on the bed.  The  only parameter  which
                                      60

-------
                              UJ
                 c/>

                        CO    -Q
                 -P    C    S-
                  O        
                                                                                                                   flj
                                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                                   O

                                                                                                                   O)
                                                                                                                   Q-

                                                                                                                  JE:
                                                                                                                   o>
                                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                                   c
                                                                                                                   oj
                                                                                                                   S-
                                                                                                                   (8
          g
          O
                                                                                                                  JD
                                                                                                                  "r—
                                                                                                                  s-
                                                                                                        CQ
                                                                                                        CQ
                                                                                                        O
                                                                                                                  cu  _
                                                                                                                  S- -M
                                                                                                                  U_  CO
                                                                                                                  s-
                                                                                                                  3
                                                                                                                  CJ>
CD
O
                                              O

                                              O
                                                         61

-------
                     E
                    f-t
CO
      0
      0
      JD
      S-
                                                                               o
                                                                               0
                                                                                             Q
                                                                                             UJ
                                                                                             Q


                                                                                             LU
                                                                                             O
                                                                                             X
                                                                        o;
                                                                              •£.
                                                                               O>
                                                                        CD
                                                                        o

                                                                        >-
                                                                        en
                                                                        <
                                                                        CQ
                                                                        O
                                                                        o;
                                                                               o

                                                                              +j^
                                                                               CTT3
                                                                               
O
o
                     o

                     o
o

CD
            L/6UJ  '
                              62

-------
 correlated with  calcium was suspended solids, particularly in the multi-
 media  filter effluent.  TSS reductions through the filter also showed a
 negative  correlation with calcium.  The net effect of the treatment train,
 then,  was the addition of about 100 mg/1 calcium to the water.

 Cadmi urn

     The  highest removals of cadmium occurred during biological treatment,
 43 percent (mean) and 30 percent  (median).  Subsequent physical/chemical
 treatment removed only an additional 5 percent (mean), and zero removal
 on the basis of  the medians.  The reductions resulting from physical/
 chemical  treatment orocesses exhibited a strong concentration effect (r=0.95)»
 and were  moderately, proportional  to the Time dose, and inversely proportional
 to effluent turbidity, TSS and total P.  No significant removal patterns
 were observed in the multimedia filters, but a moderate concentration effect
 was seen  on the  carbon columns.   In spite of the above mentioned removal
 patterns, the observed removals were not sufficient for consistently achiev-
 ing the maximum  contaminant level (MCL) of 0.01  mg/1  as promulgated in the
 National  Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NIPDWR).   Approximately
 46 percent of the train influent samples and 21  percent of the train effluent
 samples exceeded this limit, the highest observed train effluent concentra-
 tion out  of 62 composite samples being 0.024 mg/1.

     The  frequency distributions for observed cadmium concentrations in the
 treatment sequence influent and effluent are shown in Figure 17.   The
 median concentration decreased approximately 0.003 mg/1  as a result of
 treatment, which would indicate that cadmium was relatively unaffected by
 the treatment processes employed during this phase of the project.

 Cobalt

     Cobalt was one of the refractory metals in  the treatment  train.
Although  the mean concentration dropped 16 percent during biological
 treatment, the influent and effluent median concentrations were the same.
Attention is called to the increase in cobalt concentration resulting from
 chemical  treatment, most likely originating from trace quantities within
 the lime and ferric chloride slurries.   There was,  in fact,  a  positive
 correlation between the chemical  dose and cobalt concentration,  but no
 removal patterns were observed.   The net median  increase through  the
 train was 0.010 mg/1.

     The probability distributions of the influent and effluent cobalt
concentrations shown in Figure 18 reflect its  very  refractory  nature.

Chromi urn
     The mean and median removals of chromium were 59 and 63 percent through
the activated sludge unit, and 86 percent in the Densator.   Reductions  in
the latter exhibited a strong concentration effect (r=0.99), and were in-
versely proportional to total phosphorus concentration in the process
effluent.  Multi-media filtration removed an additional  24 percent (mean) or
                                    63

-------

                         »•
                                                             .x
                                                                                  O
                                                                                  3
                                                                                  DV
                                                                                  Iff
                                                                                  O
                                                                                  O

                                                                                  0)
                                                                        3


                                                                        o
                                                                            Q
                                                                            LU
O

O
                                                                            ^
                                                                            CD-
                                                                            CD

                                                                            i—i
                                                                            UJ


                                                                            Lt-'


                                                                            >-
                                                                            3
      O

      S-
     •p
     J2
                                                                                  s-
                                                                                  3,
                                                                                  D*
o
0
                                 o

                                 0
                                                                     O
                           L/Brt 'NOIl\/yiN30NOO
                                          64

-------
      H-
      LU,
                                        o
                                  i—   O
                                  oo
                                         *
                                   .   J3
                                  •<->    S-
                                  o    
                                                                  C3>
                                                                  tS
                                                                  0
                                                                  O
                                                            Q
                                                           UJ
                                                           0
                                                           X
                                                            Qi
                                                            O
                                                            o-

                                                            CD
                                                            LU
                                                            GO
                                                                                                   Q-


                                                                                                   C7>
                                                                                                   ns

                                                                                                   O

                                                                                                   £-
                                                                  •!->

                                                                  J3s
                                                            CQ
                                                            m
                                                            O
                                                                  3 >>
                                                                  CTT3
                                                                  
                                                                  Ll_ CO
                                                                  00
                                                                  O)
                                                                  S-
                                                                  3
                                                                  CD
O
O
        o

        o
o
 •
CD
L/6UI  *NOIJA/HJ>I33NOO
                  65

-------
50 percent (median), while subsequent carbon filtration failed to remove any
chromium.  All of the train influent samples exceeded the drinking water MCL
of 0.05 mg Cr/1, while only 3 percent of the Densator effluent samples and
none of the train effluent samples exceeded the limit.

     As the data in Figure 19 clearly indicate, chromium was effectively
removed by the treatment sequence used.  It is significant to note that the
biological process was very effective in removing chromium.

Copper
     Most of the copper was removed by the activated sludge and high-pH
lime treatment, with little or no subsequent removal through filtration and
carbon adsorption processes.  A removal of 42 percent (mean) or 28 percent
(median) occurred through the activated sludge process, and a 30 percent
(mean) or 41 percent (median) removal occurred in the Densator.  Reduction
in copper by high-pH lime clarification exhibited a concentration effect,
and was proportional to both the effluent methyl orange and phenolphthalein
alkalinities.  However, removals were poor when effluent turbidity exceeded
about 3 NTU.  During filtration, the mean and median concentration increased
by 18 percent and 28 percent, respectively.  The reason for the observed
increase in copper concentrations has not been positively identified, how-
ever, corrosion of bronze piping appurtenances seems to be the plausible
explanation.

Iron

     Each unit in the high-pH lime treatment train significantly reduced the
concentration of iron.  Approximately 72 percent of the total iron removed
by the  treatment sequence was effected in  the activated sludge unit, with
mean and median removals of  67  percent and 71 percent, respectively.  The
Densator removed an additional 12 percent (mean) and 40 percent (median),
the reductions exhibiting a concentration effect.  Occasionally turbidity
and suspended solids breakthroughs in the filters caused a decline in iron
removal.  On average, the multimedia  filters removed about four times as
much iron as the Densator, with mean and median removal efficiencies of
59 percent and 60 percent, respectively.  The reductions exhibited a strong
concentration effect (r=0.997), although there was no correlation with
suspended solids or turbidity.  Removal by carbon adsorption averaged 48
percent (mean) and 29 percent (median), exhibiting a strong concentration
effect  (r=0.95).  It would appear that extreme values were damped better
in the carbon column than in the multimedia filter.  The Secondary Drinking
Water Regulation recommends a MCL of 0.3 mg/1, and this concentration was
exceeded by all of the train influent samples and none of the train effluent
samples.

Mercury

     Mercury was effectively removed by each process in the treatment train.
Removal through the activated sludge unit averaged 45 percent and 64
percent based on the mean and median values, the respective Densator removals

                                     66

-------
 1.000
 0.100
LU
O
52:
O
  0.010
 0.001
\
                                                    Act. SI.  Inf.
                                            	 Act.  SI.  Eff.

                                            	 Dens.  Eff.

                                            	 Carb.  Col.  Eff.

                                               V
        2      5     10   15 20   30  40  50  60   70   80- 85   90    95


                  PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR  EXCEEDED



        Figure 19.  Frequency distributions  for chromium, high-pH
                    lime coagulation study.
                                          98
                                  67

-------
being 51 percent and 31 percent.  Reductions through the Densator exhibited
a concentration effect (r=0.86).  Mean and median removals through the
multimedia  filters were 35 percent and 48 percent, respectively* the
reductions exhibiting a concentration effect (r=0.80).   The mean concentra-
tion of mercury increased by 17 percent through the carbon column, but the
median concentration declined by 38 percent.  Although  the influent and
effluent distribution patterns are very similar, the effluent skews slightly
more toward the high side, which would explain the inequity between the mean
and median removals.  Reductions through the carbon column exhibited a non-
linear concentration effect, with a cut-off reduction of around 0.15 yg/1.
The maximum train influent concentration was only 1.95 ug/1, just below the
MCL of 2.0 ug/1 established in the NIPDWR.  Consequently, the train effluent
quality was well within the limitation established for drinking water.

     Frequency distributions for selected points in the Pilot Plant process-
ing are presented in Figure 20.

Potassium

     As anticipated potassium was not significantly removed by any of the
unit processes.  The greatest removals occurred  in the activated sludge
system, 2.5 percent by means and 4.0 percent by  median.  The remaining
units in the  treatment train effected only  minor, and probably random,
changes in the concentration.

Magnesium

     Removal  of magnesium through the activated  sludge  unit was only  5 per-
cent  (mean) or 4 percent  (median),  compared to  80  percent  (mean) or 87 per-
cent  (median) through  the Densator.  The  probability distribution pattern
of magnesium  was significantly  altered as  a result  of chemical treatment,
and the reductions  through the  Densator exhibited  a concentration effect
 (r=0.56).   Effluent turbidity  and suspended solids  were a fair measure of the
amount  of magnesium in the effluent,  accompanied,  however,  by a  few larger
variations.   Effluent  total  P  concentration correlated  well with  effluent
magnesium  (r=-0.69), while the reductions were  found to  correlate with both
 effluent TSS  (r=0.50)  and total P  (r=0.70).

      Removal  of magnesium by filtration  averaged 34 percent (mean)  or 30
 percent (median).   The reductions  exhibited a  linear concentration  effect
 (r=0.78),  increasing sharply with  suspended solids removals of  90 percent
 or more.   The reductions  also decreased as the filter  effluent  TSS  and
 turbidity  increased.

      Carbon filtration effected removals of 11  percent (mean)  or 21  percent
 (median),  the reductions  exhibiting a concentration effect (r=0.48).   Prob-
 ability distributions on  the Densator, filter,  and carbon effluents were
 quite similar, all  skewed toward high concentrations,  as opposed to the
 log-normal  pattern of the activated sludge effluent and influent distribu-
 tions.
                                       68

-------
  10.00
    1.00
 CT)





 *\





O

1-Tl




£
o
o
    o.io
    0.01
	  Act.  SI.  Eff.


          Dens. Eff.



	—  Carb. Col,  Eff
                  PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED


         Figure  20.   Frequency  distributions  for mercury,  high-pH

                     lime  coagulation  study.
                                  69

-------
Manganese

     The activated sludge unit removed 28 percent (mean)  or 29 percent
(median) of the influent manganese, but the biggest removals were observed
as a result of chemical treatment, 80 percent of both the mean and median
values.  Reductions through the Densator exhibited a strong linear concen-
tration effect (r=0.94), but failed to correlate with other water quality
parameters.  The median filter effluent concentration was zero; however,
the removal of manganese, based on mean values, was about 40 percent.
Although non-linear,the reductions through the filter exhibited a concentra-
tion effect (r=0.71), and were inversely proportional to  effluent TSS. There
was no  removal  of manganese across the carbon column.  The Densator caused
a major shift in the distribution of concentrations, and  singly achieved
about 2/3 of the total train reduction.  The MCL of 0.05  mg/1 was exceeded
by 86 percent of the activated sludge influent samples, 44 percent of  the
activated sludge effluent samples, but none of the succeeding samples  in the
treatment train.

Molybdenum

     The activated sludge removals of molybdenum were 16  percent (mean) and
25 percent (median).  However, the concentrations increased through the
Densator by about 0.002 mg/1, originating probably from contamination  in
the lime.  A removal of 59 percent (mean) or 41 percent (median) through the
multimedia filters essentially counteracted the increase.  The reductions
through the filters exhibited a concentration effect (r=0.89) and possibly
a correlation with several other parameters; however, the paucity of data
precluded conclusive analysis.

     The totally refractory behavior of molybdenum is clearly evident  in
Figure 21, which presents the probability distribution functions for train
influent and effluent concentrations.

Sodium

     No significant sodium removal was expected, and none was observed.  The
largest removals of sodium occurred in the activated sludge unit and carbon
column, about 2 percent in both cases based on median concentrations.
Increases occurred in the Densator, originating most likely from the coagul-
ants.  Although the mean increase was about 9 mg/1, the median increase was
only slightly less than 2 mg/1.  Because the most frequent and largest
increases occurred during August 1972, the problem may be a result of  one
chemical shipment.  The highest observed train effluent concentration  was
195 mg/1, approximately 67 percent over the mean.

     For practical purposes sodium is completely refractory to the unit
processes utilized during this study.
Nickel
     Nickel was removed about equally well by both the activated sludge unit

                                     70

-------
                                                                                                            0)
                                                                                                            Q-


                                                                                                            0>
Q
LU
Q
LU
LU
O
X
LU

Q;
o
                                                                                                      Q    >>
                                                                                                      LU   r—
                                                                                                      _1    O
                                                                                                     Cf
                                                                                                     LU
                                                                                                     CD
                                                                                                     LU
                                                                                                     CO
      vt

      o
      •r—
      4->
                                                                                                     O    -r- "O


                                                                                                     I—     (/>(/>
                                                                                                     I—I    "i—
                                                                                                     	I    "O E
                                                                                                     t-H        O

                                                                                                     §     ^TJ
                                                                                                     CQ     c ns
                                                                                                     o     a> «—
                                                                                                     o;     3-3
                                                                                                     Q_     O" O>
                                                                                                            o> 
O

O
                                                      71

-------
and the Densator.  Activated sludge removals were 21  percent (mean)  and 18
percent (median), while the Densator removals averaged 36 percent (mean)
to 46 percent (median).  Reductions through the Densator exhibited a concen-
tration effect (r=0.51), and were inversely proportional to effluent TSS
(r=0.44).  Percent nickel removals also correlated inversely with TSS, and
the concentrations of nickel and TSS exhibited a linear correlation  (r=0.52).
Further removal of nickel was accomplished by multimedia and carbon  filtra-
tion, with an observed decrease of about 0.01 mg/1 in each unit.

     The relatively equal division of nickel removal  between the  biological
process and the AWT process is indicated in Figure 22.

Lead

    The largest portion of lead was removed in the activated sludge  process,
57 percent (mean) to 70 percent (median), and there were no significant
changes in the concentration throughout the remainder of the train.   No
significant patterns were observed on the multimedia filter, but  the carbon
column reductions exhibited a concentration effect (r=0.69).  The drinking
water MCL of 0.05 mg/1 was exceeded in 83 percent of the train influent
samples and 34 percent of the train effluent samples.  The highest train
effluent concentration was 0.10 mg/1, which occurred in two samples, both
collected during June 1972.

     Frequency distributions are shown in Figure 23,  and definitely  indicate
the importance of the biological process for removing lead.

Selenium

     The activated sludge unit removed most of the selenium, 83 percent
(mean) and 82 percent (median).  High-pH lime coagulation removed 21 percent
(mean) and 65 percent (median), and the reductions exhibited a concentration
effect (r=0.43).  Selenium possesses the unusual property of being soluble
in caustic alkali solution, which explains the linear correlation between
effluent selenium and methyl orange alkalinity (r=0.62).  Also, there were
negative correlations between the reductions in selenium and methyl  orange
alkalinity (r=0.33), phenolphethalein alkalinity (r=0.41), and lime  dose
(r=0.38).  Following high-pH lime clarification there was an apparent
increase in selenium through the multimedia filters,  then a substantial
removal on the carbon columns.  From the Densator through the carbon columns
there was 47 percent removal of selenium (mean), or 71 percent (median)
removal.  Of all the metals investigated, selenium had the highest average
removal efficiency on activated carbon: 51 percent (mean) to 88 percent
(median).  However, there were no apparent correlations between selenium
removal and the operating/process control parameters.  The NIPDWR MCL of
0.01 mg/1 was exceeded in 52 percent of the train influent samples,  and
in none of the remaining samples.

     Frequency distributions for selected sampling locations are  presented
in Figure 24.
                                      72

-------
                                               a
                                               'a:


                                               °
                                               trs
                                               uj

                                                     -3

                                                     1
                                                     0
                                                     o
                                                    0
                                               £3   S.

                                               o-   p
                                                    sz
                                                    o
                                                    •»->
                                                    OU
                                                       V)
                                                    
-------
                                                                a
                                                                LU
                                                                O
                                                                X
                                                                UJ
o

a
                                                                 o-
                                                                 LLJ


                                                                 CD
                                                                 UJ

                                                                 CQ
                                                                 U_

                                                                 O
                                                                 CQ
                                                                 •=C
                                                                 CO

                                                                 O
                                                                 Qi
                                                                 CL
                                                                      a>
                                                                      
                                                                      -o
                                                                       fO
                                                                       a;
                                                                       s-
                                                                       o
      c/>
      c
      o
                                                                       s_

                                                                       VI

                                                                      •o
      a>  •
      3 >>
      cr-o
      a» =s
      s- •»->
      u_ 
                                                                      oo
                                                                      CM

                                                                       a>

                                                                       3
                                                                       D>
L/6ui 6
                     74

-------
                                              Q
                                              UJ
                                              o
                                              a
                                              LU
                                                •
                                              CJ3
                                              LU
                                                    O)
                                                    Q.
                                                    I
                                                    D>
                                                   e
                                                   
-------
Silicon

     Silicon had negligible removal by the activated sludge process  and a
slight increase through the Densator and carbon column.   All the significant
removals occurred in the multimedia filters: 50 percent (mean)  and 49 per-
cent (median).  Unfortunately, there were insufficient data to  develop
confidence in the removal efficiencies or correlations with other parameters.
The same may be said of strontium and vanadium.

Strontium

     The activated sludge process removed some strontium, 11 percent (mean)
and 10 percent (median).  Little or no removal occurred throughout the
remainder of the treatment sequence.

Vanadium

     A slight reduction in vanadium occurred in the activated sludge unit,
but the multimedia filter exacted the greatest removals: 33 percent
(mean) and 26 percent  (median).  Net mean and median train removals  were 37
percent and 18 percent, respectively.

Zinc

    Zinc was removed chiefly by biological  and chemical treatment, the
filter and carbon column only decreasing a  few extreme values.   Activated
sludge removals were 62 percent (mean) and  67 percent (median), while
Densator removals averaged 48 percent and 70 percent, respectively.

     The Densator reductions exhibited a strong concentration effect
(r=0.67), and generally increased  as the effluent alkalinities and lime
dose increased and as  effluent turbidity decreased.

     A mean removal of 24  percent  was, observed across the multimedia filter,
although there was no  change  in the median  concentrations.  Reductions
through the filter were  due primarily to a  concentration effect  (r=0.65),
particularly  at influent concentrations exceeding about 0.10 mg/1.  The
same comments apply to the carbon  column where a 14  percent removal of mean
concentrations occurred without any change  in  the median values.  The
highest value of  zinc  ever observed was 0.88  mg/1 in the train  influent, well
below  the Secondary Drinking  Water Regulation  recommendation of  5.0 mg/1.
                                     76

-------
                                 SECTION 7

                              ALUM COAGULATION
 GENERAL
    f  The  second  phase  in  the  investigation of metals removals by AWT process-
 es  involved  the  study  of  alum coagulation of an activated sludge effluent
 followed  by  multimedia filtration  and activated carbon adsorption.  A 3-week
 start-up  period  commenced in  early November of 1972 to establish steady-
 state conditions in  the upflow clarifier prior to collecting samples and
 acquiring data.   The starting date, was November 20, 1972, and this phase
 of  the project terminated October  30, 1973 -- nearly a year's duration.

      The  process configuration utilized at the Demonstration Plant for the
 alum  coagulation phase of the project is shown in Figure  25   The
 fundamental  difference between the three phases of the project was the
 primary coagulant used for chemical treatment. An average alum dose of 130
 mg/1  was  used to coagulate the activated sludge effluent; however, the low
 alkalinity in the activated sludge effluent, resulting from nitrification,
 necessitated the feeding  of 50 mg/1 lime (as CaO) to permit the coagulation
 reactions to proceed to completion.

 u    Tab™24    Summar1zes the water quality data for the alum coagulation
 phase.  Effluent quality was  excellent,  as was the overall performance
 of the treatment  sequence.  COD removal  was slightly better than 97 percent
 and BOD5 reductions approached 99 percent.                                  '

     The mean soluble total organic carbon (SOC)  concentration in the
 effluent was 4 mg/1, which was at the lower limit of sensitivity for the
 analytical instrument being used.

     The effluent total dissolved solids (TDS)  concentration  averaged 491
mg/1, and was not changed significantly  by the treatment employed during
 this phase of the study.  No significant changes  in either TDS or specific
conductance was expected,  and none was observed.   The treatment sequence
proved to be very effective in controlling  the suspended solids  concentra-
tions in the product water, which averaged only 2 mg/1.

     The reductions  in  microorganism  populations  observed during  the alum
coagulation phase were  good,  but not  comparable to the  dramatic  kills
obtained with high-pH lime treatment.  The  geometric  mean fecal  coliform
density in the effluent from the activated  carbon  was 630 organisms  per
                                    77

-------
o
CU
in
   o.
   1C
   CTl
                                                                                                   CD
                                                                                                    
                                                                                                   03
                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                   O

                                                                                                   E
                                                                                                    (O
                                                                                                    s-oo
                                                                    o o
                                                                    O CO

                                                                    in  s-
                                                                    c/1    S-  (J
                        +•> M-  O


                        S  01
                        OJ  (J    S- 4->
                        (C  O .
  CO
; i—
: o_
                                                    78

-------


•"
• 1
.-•*
.*
..
I'' f

i
« •"
f «
• •_
t

s\"g
C_J
o
h-
_u
00
C_D
ZD
-
	 1
Z3
rs
LU
2:
ZD
•-3
=a:
D;
0.
eC
o:
=c
03
Jj
=£
•-3
O
UJ
Q
O
CO
CTi
CXI
CTl
                                                   O.
                                                   O
0       °,    °   0000   O   O
°,       CxJ        000      CM
1X1                  CM  i—
un =d-  co  CM
                     CM

                     L/Sui      L/6iu       L/6'U        L/6iu

      39v Beams    aoo     N-SHNI        QOD       N-eHN

                     NWniOO  N08HV3    'JJ3 39QniS Q31VAI13V
                                                   -a
                                                   01
                                                   4->
                                                   o
                                                   CD

                                                   'a!   •
                                                   co  >,
                                                     T3
                                                   "0  13
                                                   E 4->
                                                   rt5  CO
                                                   CO  O
                                                   CD -r-
                                                   3 +->
                                                   i —  ro
                                                   ro i —
                                                   >  ^s
                                                      CD
                                                   CD  re
                                                   CT)  O
                                                   ro  o

                                                   01  E
                                                   a>  3
                                                   ~a i —
                                                   =3  ro
                                                   r—
                                                   CO OJ
                                                   O
                                                     S-
                                                   IO O
                                                   •M Ct_
                                                   O
                                                  i — to
                                                   a. c
                                                     o
                                                   CO T-
                                                   O) -l->
                                                  •i- ro
                                                   S- S-
                                                   a> -t->
                                                   (^ c:
                                                     CD
                                                   CD o
                                                  CO
                                                  OJ
                                                  CD
               79

-------
TABLE  24.
OVERALL WATER TREATMENT SUMMARY ALUM COAGULATION STUDY
Parameter
COD, mg/1
SOC, mg/1
BODg, mg/1
TSS, mg/1
TDS, mg/1
SC, iimho/cm
NH3-N, mg/1
Org. N, mg/1
(N02+N03)-N, mg/1
N02-N, mg/1
T-P, mg/1
pH
T. Alk., mg/1
P. Alk., mg/1
Standard Plate Count,
per ml
Total MPN, per 100 ml
Fecal MPN, per 100 ml
-- Not Available
N/A Not Applicable
Raw
Waste-
Water
mg/1
494
--
185
238
--
750
16.7
12.4
0.5
0.1
7.4
211
0
—
—
--


Carbon
Col umn
Effluent
mg/1
13
4
<2
2
491
711
1.7
1.5
8.5
0.2
1.9
7.5
114
3
6.9xl02
6.5xl03
6.3xl02


Reduction
(percent)
97.4
N/A
>98.9
99.2
N/A
5.2
89.8
,87.9
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
46:0
N/A
N/A
- . m ••>'•"•
N/A


                                     80

-------
 100 ml, which is about a four-log reduction.

 COMPLETELY-MIXED ACTIVATED SLUDGE

      The No. 1 completely-mixed activated sludge system operated  during*
 this portion of the research effort with unsettled effluent from  the stage
 1p!nc*llng filters at the White Rock STP serving as  the influent.   Table
  1 V,  1S a Performance and water quality summary for  the twelve month
 study period, and all  values presented are arithmetic means. Table  26   is
 a summary of the hydraulic operation and process control  variables  for  the
 ^,7 «tSm •

      One objective of this phase was to achieve complete, stable  nitrifica-
 tion in the activated sludge system.  The effluent NH--N concentration
 averaged 1.7 mg/1, which represented a considerable improvement over  the
 3.7 mg/1 mean for the  lime coagulation phase.   Figure  26  presents  time
 series plots of the sludge age  in the activated sludge process, and
 effluent concentrations  for COD and  NH,,-N in both  the activated sludge  and
 carbon column effluents.      .-    •   •

      Operation of the  process was not conventional  in  that  the theoretical
 residence time in  the  aeration  basin was  only 4.4  hours  (2.05 hours is
 based on both influent and return sludge  flows).   The  residence time was
 very low for a nitrifing  process  when  evaluated  in  terms of conventional
 design criteria  for plug-flow systems.  These data  indicate that long
 ?v hJn^^H1^5^! n0t "ecessary Provided that  the sludge age is  sufficient-
 ly high  and  that adequate  oxygen  transfer capacity  is available.   Figure 37
 presents  the  probability  distributions  for the various forms of nitrogen
 in the activated sludge influent.  Median values are the 50-percentile
 n^lcf^J  •   T??  data are  ln rather good agreement with the arithmetic means
 presented  in  Table    26     For  instance the median concentration  for NH--N
 during this  phase was  13.2 mg/1, while the mean concentration was  13.8 mVl
 The  close  agreement between mean and median, and the fact that the data
 &2V5  re atlvely  straight lines on log-probability paper indicates that
 the  data closely approximate a normal distribution.

     Figure  28   presents frequency distributions for .the upflow  clarifier
 effluent nitrogen concentrations, and these data closely approximate the
 nitrogen concentrations expected in the activated sludge effluent, with  the
 obvious exception of the organic nitrogen data.   The median  NH--N  concen-
 tration shown is 0,6 mg/1, although  the mean concentration  Tn3the upflow
£nd iS?r     uent.was 2.04-wg/l.  The 240 percent discrepancy between mean
and median values is not uncommon when evaluating water quality data  for
AWT processes.

     Figure  29   presents the probability distribution for  COD and TOC  »
concentrations observed in the activated sludge  influent.  These values

                                            k
                                    81

-------
TABLE   25.   PERFORMANCE SUMMARY OF THE COMPLETELY-MIXED
             SYSTEM, ALUM COAGULATION STUDY
ACTIVATED SLUDGE
Parameter Raw
Waste-
Water
COD 494
TOC, Soluble
BOD5 185
TSS 238
TDS 657
SC, ymho/cm
NH3-N 16.7
Org. N 12.4
N02+N03-N
N02-N
Total P
pH, units 7.4
T. Alk. (as CaC03)
P.Alk. (as CaC03)
Standard Plate
Count, per ml
Total Coliforms
per 100 ml
Fecal Coliforms
per 100 ml
Activated
Sludge
Influent
(mg/1)
237
20
62
142
507
750
13.82
10.06
1.2
0.126
9.8
7.3
206
0
l.SxlO6
1.3xl07
l.SxlO6
Acti yated
Sludge
Effluent
(mg/1)
57
10
28
28
498
691
2.36
3.85
8.4
0.076
7.8
7.2
126
0
5.1xl04
4.2xl05
S.lxlO4
Reduction
by the A.S.
System only
(percent)
75.95
50.00
54.84
80.28
1.78
7.87
82.92
61.73
N/A
39.68
20.41
N/A
N/A
38.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
      Not Available
      N/A Not Applicable
                                     82

-------
TABLE  26,       PROCESS CONTROL SUMMARY FOR THE COMPLETELY-MIXED ACTIVATED
                SLUDGE SYSTEM, ALUM COAGULATION STUDY
                         HYDRAULIC OPERATION
            Q (influent)


            Q (return)


            Q (waste)


            Aeration T

            Clarifier  Overflow Rate


            Weir  loading
 10.7 I/sec
 (169 gpm)

 10.7 I/sec
 (169 gpm)

 4994 I/day
(1293 gpd)

 2.05 hours
       3      7
 14.0 m/day*m
(344 gal/ft.  -day)

 33.2 m3/m-day
(2674 gal/ft-day)
                           PROCESS  CONTROLS
           MLSS

           MLVSS

           RAS

           SVI

           Air supplied


           D.O.

           D.O. Uptake rate

           F/M (COD)

           F/M (SOC)

           F/M (BOD)

           Sludge Age

           Temperature
            4127 mg/1

            2852 mg/1

            8248 mg/1

            182 mg/1

            154.8 I/sec
            (328 cfm)

            2.6 mg/1

            60.6 mg/l-hr.

            0.311 day'1 ,

            0.026 day"1

            0.081 day"1

            10.6 days
            21°C
            (70°F)
                                  83

-------
100.0
   10.0
 Di
 UJ
 O
 O
 O
         >      5     10  15 20   30   40  50  60   70   80  85  90


                   PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED


          Figure 27.  Probability distributions for different forms
                      of nitrogen in the activated  sludge influent.
                                   84

-------
100.0,
 10.0
O
I—I
g

UJ
O
O
  1.1
 0.1
                         Org. N
                                  NH--N
     2      5     10   15 20   30   40   50  60   70   80  85  90    95    98

               PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED
     Figure  28.  Probability distributions for different
                 forms  of nitrogen in the upflow clarifier
                 effluent.
                                85

-------
1000.0
 100.0
     1.0
                   10  15  20   30   40   50  60   70   80  85  90    95


                  PROBABILITY OF  BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED
           Figure  29.   Probability distributions for COD and TOC
                       concentrations In the activated sludge influent.
                                    86

-------
 UPFLOW CLARIFIIR

     The  performance  of  the  upflow cUrifier  (Infilco Densator)  Is summa-
 rized  in  Table  27.  The  chemical  treatment process performed  reasonably
 well,  and the process control  criteria are summarized in Table 23.

     The  operation  of the  Densator wa$ relatively conventional with the
 exception of a  few  significant points/ The mean value of the dissipation
 function, G, was 67 sec~   during  this portion of the study, which is sub-
 stantially lower than the  500  to  1000 sec'4 normally found in mixing basins.
 However due to  the  construction of the Densator, the theoretical residence
 time in mixing  zone was  8.4  minutes, about 11 times the normal detention
 time of 45 seconds.   The resulting Gt value of 34,000 is reasonable for
 mixing  basins.

     The  average recycle flow  of  0.3 liter/sec (4gpm) is somewhat misleading.
 Sludge  was  recycled during portions of the study, but no improvement in
 effluent  quality was  observed  as  a function of the sludge recycle; therefore,
 during  most of  the  alum coagulation phase sludge recycle was not employed.

     Figure 29a shows the  observed frequency  distributions for  total phos-
 phorus  and  turbidity  values.   The  median total phosphorus concentration was
 2.3 mg/1, which is  much higher than one would expect from an. AWT facility,
 but the average alum  dose of 130 mg/1 would be expected to yield about that
 concentration.  Factually, budgetary constraints prohibited feeding alum
 doses adequate for  acceptable  phosphorus removal.

     The  reduced alum dose probably had a detrimental  effect on metals
 removals, but the extent of the effect of reduced coagulant dose cannot be
 accurately  assessed.   It should be noted that the turbidity data indicate
 that excellent coagulation and liquid/solids separation were obtained during
 this part of the project.

MULTIMEDIA  FILTERS

     The  No. 1 mixed-media filter was in operation during most of this  phase
 of the  project, although the No. 2 dual-media filter was occasionally used.
The filters were operated at an average flow of 2.5 liters/sec.  (39 gpm)
which resulted in a mean filtration rate of 7.58 m/hr.  (3.1  gpm/sq.ft.).
The filters were backwashed when the headloss was 9 to 10 feet.   The average
run time  between filter washes was 40 hours,  and the backwash water consump-
tion was  2.31  percent of the product water.

     The  data in Table 29 indicate that the filters performed well.   The
reduction in suspended solids was almost 60 percent,  and the  product water
clarity was always  very good.  No statistically significant changes  in  the
various forms  of nitrogen were observed.   The microbiological  data indicate
that the filters were not very effective in reducing  the bacterial  popula-
tions;  all reductions were  less than one-half log.
                                    87

-------
TABLE    27.
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE UPFLOW CLARIFIER.ALUM COAGULATION
STUDY
Parameter
COD
TOC, Soluble
BODC
0
TSS
TDS
SC, pmho/cm
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+N03-N
N02-N
Total P
pH, units
T. Alk as CaC03
P. Alk as CaC03
Acti vated
Sludge
Effluent
mg/1
57
10
28
28
498
691
2.4
3.9
8.4
0.08
7.8
7.2
126
0
Standard Plate Count „
per ml 5.1x10
Total Coliforms
per 100 ml
Fecal Coliforms
per 100 ml
N/A: Not Appl
4.2xl05
S.lxlO4
i cable
Densator
Effluent
mg/1
28
8
6
17
532
723
2.0
2.4
8.6
0.10
3.0
7.6
120
5
4.0xl03
2.3xl04
l.SxlO3

Reduction
(percent)
50.9
20.0
78.6
39.3
N/A
N/A
13.6
37.9
N/A
N/A ,
61.5
N/A
4.8
N/A
92.2
94.5
94.2

                                       88

-------
TABLE  28,     PROCESS SUMMARY FOR THE UPFLOW  CLARIFIER.ALUM
               COAGULATION STUDY
Q (influent)

Q (recycle)

Q (waste)

Mixing T
       G
Flocculation T
             G
Settling T
Clan'fier overflow rate

Weir loading

Alum Dose
Lime Dose
6.1 I/sec
( 97 gpm)
0.3 I/sec
(4 gpm  )
75064 I/day
(19,832 gpd)
8.4 minutes
67 sec."1
48 minutes
80 sec.  ~1
4.3 hours
28.2 m3/day-m2
(691 gal/ft 2-day)
31.6 nvVm-day
(2540 gal/ft-day).
130 mg/1
50 mg/1
                                89

-------
100.0
  10.0
   1.0
   0.1

















To



»
•
*


*
*
*

2

















tal P

•
	 « 	
•



»
«
•



















(mg
— •» —




4
•




















/I)
»
•


























»
•
•



•
t





















* '


•
*





















*



• «






















*
•


. '






















*

•

Tur



















*
*

*
*
•

bidil



















•
•


*

:y


















*
•


«
«


[NTU

















•
* *

9
•
•




)

















(
» "

•
«












5 10 15 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 85 90 95 98
                 PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED

       Figure 29a.  Frequency distributions for total P and
                    turbidity values in the upflow clarifier
                    effluent.
                                 90

-------
TABLE   29,
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE MULTIMEDIA FILTER, ALUM
COAGULATION STUDY
Parameter Densator
Effluent
(mg/i)
COD
TOC, Soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SC, pmho/cm
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+N03-N
N02-N
Total P
pH, units
T. Alk as CaC03
P. Alk as CaC03
Standard Plate Count
per ml 4.
Total Coliforms
per 100 ml 2.
Fecal Coliforms
per 100 ml 1.
28
8
6
17
532
723
2.0
2.4
8.6
0.10
3.0
7.6
120
5
Oxl O3
3x1 04
8x1 03
Multimedia
Filter
Ef f 1 uent
(mq/1 )
26
8
3
7
515
710
2.1
2.1
8.6
0.15
2.4
7.5
117
4
2.6xl03
1.3xl04
1.5xl03
Reduction
(percent)
71
0.0
50.0
58.8
3.2
1.8
2.0*
12.1
0.0
42.3*
20.0
N/A
2.5
20.0
35.0
43.5
16.7
                                 91

-------
ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION COLUMN

     The No. 3 column was placed in service with a fresh charge of virgin
carbon in November 1972.  During portions of the months of February and
March 1973, the No. 4 column replaced the No. 3 column in the treatment
sequence; however, from March until the end of the alum coagulation study
the No. 3 column was used in the treatment sequence.  The final X/M was
0.29 Ib. COD applied/lb. carbon, although the COD removal efficiency had not
begun to decline noticeably.

     The carbon contactors were operated at an average flow of 1.6 liters/
sec (25 gpm) which resulted in a surface loading of  4.80 m/hr.
(2.0 gpm/sq.ft.) and an empty-bed contact time of 37 minutes.  The average
run time between backwashes was 113 hours, and the backwash water consump-
tion averaged 0.85 percent of the product water.

     Performance in the column was excellent, as the data in Table 30
indicate.   COD reduction averaged 50 percent, as did the soluble TOC con-
centration  (SOC).  At a surface loading of   4.89 m/hr.  (2.0 gpm/ft.2),
the column  functioned as an excellent filter and reduced the TSS concentra-
tion by 71  percent to 2 mg/1.

     Frequency distributions for the observed concentrations of different
forms of nitrogen are shown in Figure 30.  The median ammonia nitrogen
concentration of 0.4 mg/1 indicates that good nitrification was obtained
during this portion of the project.  The median nitrate  and organic nitrogen
concentrations were 8.2 and 1.4 mg/1, respectively.

     Figure 31 presents frequency distributions for  COD, TOC, color, and TSS
values in  the carbon column effluent.  The product water COD concentrations
were relatively low and had a median concentration of less than 12 mg/1.
The COD  concentration was less than 20 mg/1  in 85 percent of the samples
analyzed.   The curve for TSS data  indicates  that the down-flow carbon
columns provided additional filtering, and that 95 percent of the samples
had TSS  concentrations  less  than  10 mg/1.

     The carbon adsorption columns were  not  particularly effective in
reducing the  population of microorganisms.   In general  a half-log reduction
was observed  through the  carbon  column.
                                     92

-------
  TABLE 30.
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE ACTIVATED
CARBON ADSORPTION COLUMN, ALUM COAGULATION
OIUUI     ;   •                 -
Parameter
COD
TOC soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SC, ymho/cm
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+N03_N
N02_N
Total P
pH, units
T. Alk. as CaCOs
P.Alk. as CaC03
Std. Plate Count
per ml
Total Coliforms
per 100 ml
Fecal Coliforms
per 100 ml
Multimedia
Filter
Effluent
(mg/1)
26
8
3
7
515
710
2.08
2.10
8.6
.15
2.4
7.5
117
4
2.6 X 103
1.3 X 104
1.5 X 103
Carbon
Column
Effluent
(mg/1 )
13
4
<2
2
491
711
1.71
1.49
8.5
0.22
1.9
7.5
114
3
6.9 X 102
6.5 X 103
6.3 X 102
Reduction
(percent)
50.0
50.0
<33.3
71.4
4.7
N/A
17.8
, 22.0
1.2
N/A
20.8
N/A
2.6
25.0
73.5
50.0
58.0
N/A:  Not Applicable
                                 93

-------
loo.o r





10.0
CONCENTRATION, mg/1
o — '
, •
_i O











,X
X















s















/

Org.













/


N











—,



'•











N0?
^



^"











& NC




+*"


y
r
1






)3-N




^^
Y
^









-




>
/-











,^-^



y
'











...
















^
—
y














j
ir


^, *






, — , —





X
-N


<**'






            PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED

Figure 30.  Frequency distributions for observed nitrogen
            concentrations in the final product water, alum
            coagulation study.
                             94

-------
100.1
_
o
                                             d
                               Color
                               (Pt-Co Units)
                                                                   •
mg
RA
C
CO
                 COO
                         7
                          ••  TOC
                               /
b

                                             TSS
•
10  15 20   30   40  50  60   70   80  85  90
                                                            95
98
               PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED

Figure 31.  Frequency distributions for selected water quality
            parameters in the final product water, alum coagulation
            study.
                                 95

-------
METALS REMOVALS                                    .     ,          A

     A summary of the metals data obtained during the alum coagulation study
appears in Tables  31 through  35, in the order  of treatment sequence.
Silver

     All samples analyzed during November. and December had less than the
observable detection limit of l.Oyg/1 Ag; therefore  , analysis for silver
was terminated after the first week of January 1973.          ;

Aluminum

     Analysis for  aluminum was initiated on April  1,  1973, because of the
interest in  aluminum addition originating from the alum.  A relatively large
removal occurred through the activated sludge process, 34 percent and 61
percent of the mean and median concentrations, respectively.  In the up-ftow
clarifier, the mean concentration  increased 1.7 mg/1, and the median concen-
tration increased  0.8  mg/1.  These represent about 14 percent and 7 percent,
respectively, of the amount  of aluminum fed  (11.8  mg/1 as aluminum). Both
the  influent and effluent  probability distributions  exhibited parallel,  log-
normal  patterns, indicating  the  increase was consistent yet also dependent
upon  the  influent  concentration.   The effluent concentration was proportion-
al to  the  alum dose  (r=0.40),  but  correlation is poor.   It appears that  the
higher pH  values resulting  from  the  use of  lime was, a dominant  factor in in-
creasing  the solubility of  aluminum,  as effluent aluminum was  linearly   .
proportional to  phenolphthalein  alkalinity  (r=0.78).

      The  highest  removals  of aluminum within the treatment train occurred in
the  multimedia filter, both the  mean and  median  removals  being  about 64  per-
 cent.   Filter  reductions exhibited a concentration effect  (r=0.94), and  were
 inversely proportional to  effluent TSS  and  turbidity. The effluent concen-
 tration of aluminum was also proportional to TSS  (r=0.77) and  turbidity
 (r=0.51).

      Further removals occurred in  the carbon column, 23  percent and 65  per-
 cent based on mean and median values.  Reductions  were.again  proportional
 to the influent concentration (r=0.59).   Removal of,aluminum  in bpth the
 multimedia filter and carbon column was nearly  sufficient to  offset the
 increase in the Densator.   Although the mean train effluent  concentration
 exceeded the mean activated sludge effluent concentration,  there was  an  over-
 all  train of removal  of aluminum amounting  to  5  percent (mean) or 78  percent
 (median).  The large difference between these  removal efficiencies arises
 from the extreme  concentrations imparted  by the  alum coagulation.   Consequent-
 ly, the frequency of extreme values was roughly the same in  the Densator,
 filter, and carbon column effluents.                        ,

 Arsenic
      Arsenic was removed by each unit process in the treatment train.  Mean
 and median removals were 12 percent and 6'percent through the activated

                                      96      •;  '

-------
TABLE 31.
ACTIVATED SLUDGE INFLUENT METALS
SUMMARY ALUM TREATMENT
NOVEMBER 1972 - OCTOBER 1973


Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
V*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.0
0.60
8.5
0.36
0.125
0.010
56.0
1KO
0.024
0.215
0.30 .
1.17
0.36
12.8 .
4.78
0.080
13.0
90.5
0.100
0.110
3.0
9.8,
5.2
0.320
6EO.
MEAN
0.0
0.55
8.4
0.35
0.116-
0.007
57.7
11.0
0.025
0.191
0.22
1.13
0.36
13.2
4.77
0.082
9.3
90.5
0.101 •
0.109
3.3
.10.1
4.7
0.364
ARITH.
MEAN
0.0
0.63
11,4
0.36
0.132
0.014
59.3
12.2
0.029
0.236
0.33
1.28
0.52
13.3
4.80
0.083
20.9
92.0
0.114
O.T21
4.6
10.3
4.8
0.520
or

0.0
0.32
12.6
0.071
0.072
0.013
14.4
6.1
0.015
0.146
0.25
0.93
0.59
1.7
0.60
0.016
34.4
16.5
0.064
0.053
4.6
2.4
1.2
0.66
MAX.

0.0
1.80
100.0
0.54
0.48
0.040
105.0
34.0
0.080
0.750
1.03
7.80
3.20
16.7
6.52
0.130
170.0
123.0
0.38
0.35
19.5
14.5
7.2
4.10
MIN.

0.0
0.18
0.0
0.19
0.03
0.0
31.0
1.0
0.0
0.027
0.01
0.28
0.0
11.8
3.67
0.054
0.0
55.0
0.01
0.03
0.0
7.0
2.1
0.05
	 J
N

9
50
87
84
74
23
65
104
90
104
65
65
50
9
23
66
26
52
66
103
66
12
17
66
 Concentration in mg/1
            '•    *
                               :  97

-------
TABLE 32;       ACTIVATED SLUDGE EFFLUENT METALS SUMMARY
                ALUM TREATMENT NOVEMBER 1972 -
                OCTOBER 1973
       MEDIAN
MAX.
                                                         MIN.
Ag*
+y
Al
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
j
K
Mg
*3
Mn
Mo*
Na
N1
Pb
Se*
Si
v*
Zn
0.0
0.24
8.0
0.35
0.050
0.0
52.0
5.0
0.020
0.060
0.050
0.32
0.15
12.4
4.55
0.053
2.7
87.0
0.070
0.04
0.5
10.2
4.4
0.120
0.0
0.29
8.1
0.35
0.065
0.003
53.6
5.0
0.022
0.054
0.05
0.30
0.18
12.6
4.64
0.050
2.6
87.7
0.073
0.046
1.2
9.4
4.0
0.135
0.0
0.42
10.1
0.35
0.065
0.005
55.8
5.6
0.026
0.066
0.054
0.33
0.26
12.7
4.67
0.055
4.2
89.2
0.079
0.054
1.1
9.7
4.2
0.156
0.0
0.46
8.0
0.067
0.051
0.008
16.4
2.3
0.017
0.042
0.020
0.13
0.36
1.1
0.53
0.020
4.3
16.7
0.038
0.032
1.6
2.2
1.2
1.56
0.0
2.20
44.5
0.60
0.36
0.03
105.0
11.0
0.08
0.27
0.113
0.80
2.2
14.8
6.20
0.110
15.4
125.0
0.28
0.17
7.5
12.3
6.2
1.06
0.0
0.09
1.8
0.17
0.01
0.0
27.1
0.0
0.0
0.006
0.012
0.09
0.0
11.2
3.92
0.013
0.0
50.0
0.02
0.01
0.0
5.6
1.4
0.04
9
50
90
85
74
23
65
104
90
104
65
65
49
9
23
66
27
52
66
104
68
12
18
66
  Concentration in mg/1
                                   98

-------
TABLE 33.      UP-FLOW CLARIFIER METALS  SUMMARY
               NOVEMBER 1972 - OCTOBER 1973
ALUM TREATMENT



Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
v*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.0
1.03
5.8
0.37
0.040
0.0
68.0
4.0
0.018
0.019
0.025
0.12
0.09
12.3
4.50
0.040
2.0
88.5
0.060
0.030
0.0
10.8
4.0
0.070
6EO.
MEAN
0.0
1.15
5.2
0.36
0.041
0.001
67.3
4.0
0.023
0.017
0.02
0.13
0.15
12.5
4.54
0.032
2.4
87.5
0.058
0.035
1.2
10.2
3.6
0.108
ARITH.
MEAN
0.0
2.13
6.8
0.37
0.057
0.0005
69.4
4.1
0.027
0.023
0.034
0.16
0.32
12.5
4.58
0.037
3.1
89.3
0.068
0.042
1.0
10.4
3.9
0.109
(T

0.0
4.03
5.2
0.08
0.058
0.002
17.4
1.8
0.018
0.018
0.029
0.11
0.84
1.1
0.59
0.017
2.8
17.7
0.041
0.030
1.5
1.9
1.4
0.13
MAX.

0.0
25.5
25.0
0.55
0.41
0.01
122.0
11.0
0.08
0.108
0.19
0.63
4.40
14.4
5.91
0.090
9.2
132.0
0.33
0.16
7.0
13.3
6.2
0.88
MIN.

0.0
0.14
0.0
0.12
0.01
0.0
36.9
0.0
0.01
0.0
0.0
0.03
0.0
11.2
3.81
0.003
0.0
49.0
0.0
0.01
0.0
7.4
1.4
0.01
N

9
44
77
74
68
19
61
93
84
94
61
61
46
9
23
62
25
48
62
93
62
9
15
61
   Concentration in mg/1
               *ug/i
                                   99

-------
TABLE 34.     FILTER EFFLUENT METALS SUMMARY ALUM
              TREATMENT  NOVEMEBER  1972 - OCTOBER 1973



Ag*
A1
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mn*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
V*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.0
0.37
5.0
0.39
0.040
0.0
66.0
4.0
0.019
0.013
0.036
0.10
0.10
12.3
4.65
0.030
2.5
89.0
0.060
0.030
0.6
10.0
4.0
0.090
6EO.
MEAN
0.0
0.37
4.8
0.38
0.039
0.004
66.3
4.0
0.023
0.013
0.03
0.11
0.14
12.2
4.63
0.024
2.4
86.1
0.059
0.033
1.3
9.6
3.6
0.095
ARITH.
MEAN
0.0
0.78
6.1
0.38
0.056
0.012
68.6
4.0
0.027
0.019
0.056
0.13
0.25
12.3
4.65
0.030
3.8
88.9
0.070
0.040
1.2
9.7
4.0
0.106
or

0.0
1.41
5.0
0.08
0.061
0.016
18.9
1.7
0,017
0.016
0.123
0.11
0.52
1.3
0.41
0.016
5.1
24.6
0.044
0.03
1.9
1.9
1.5
0.074
MAX.

0.0
8.20
26.8
0.62
0.38
0.03
148.0
13.0
0.080
0.096
0.94
0.69
3.10
14.3
5.44
0.080
25.2
197.0
0.320
0.18
7.5
12.0
5.8
0.43
MIN.

0.0
0.07
0.0
0.19
0.0
0.0
35.0
1.0
0.011
0.0
0.0
0.03
0.0
10.0
3.89
0.0
0.0
51.0
0.0
0.01
0.0
7.2
1.1
0.02
N

8
41
71
68
62
5
57
86
77
86
57
57
43
8
21
58
23
45
58
86
56
9
15
58
  Concentration in mg/1
                  *yg/l
                                  100

-------
TABLE 35.     CARBON  COLUMN EFFLUENT METALS   SUMMARY
              ALUM TREATMENT NOVEME.BER 1972 - OCTOBER 1973
'


Ag*
AT
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
V*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.0
0.13
4.2
0.35
0.040
0.010
64.0
3.0
0.017
0.012
0.030
0.08
0.11
12.0
4.68
0.020
2.5
89.0
0.050
0.030
0.0
10.8
4.0
0.055
GEO.
MEAN
0.0
0.20
4.0
0.33
0.039
0.004
64.2
3.0
0.020
0.011
0.03
0.07
0.13
11.6
4.51
0.016
2.4
84.5
0.046
0.032
1.1
9.7
3.8
0.058
ARITH.
MEAN
0.0
0.60
5.8
0.35
0.056
0.010
66.2
3.8
0.025
0.016
0.039
0.09
0.22
11.6
4.55
0.023
3.2
86.4
0.058
0.040
0.6
9.9
4.3
0.067
0*

0.0
1.75
5.0
0.11
0.061
i 0.012
16.7
2.9
0.018
0.016
0.035
0.05
0.41
1.3
0.54
0.016
3.0
18.0
0.040
0.03
1.0
2.2
2.0
0.044
MAX.

0.0
10.80
24.1
0.78
0.38
0.02
105.0
25.0
0.080
0.095
0.25
0.25
2.25
13.0
5.32
0.081 '
8.8
125.0
0.27
0.16
5.0
13.0
8.3
0,250
MIN:.

0.0
0.07
0.0
0.12
0.0
0.0
36.3
1.0
0.008
0.0
0.01
0.0
0.0
8.9
3.23
0.0
0.0
49.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.8
1.7
0.0
N

7
39
69
65
58
4
53
83
74
83
53
53
38
7
20
54
20
41
54
83
54
7
13
54
  Concentration in mg/1
                  *ug/i
                                  101

-------
sludge unit, and 32 percent and 27 percent through the Densator.  Reductions
in the Densator exhibited a concentration effect (r=0.75), and were pro-
portional to effluent TSS (r=0.47) and reductions in phosphorus (r=0.12).
The effluent concentrations of arsenic and phosphorus were also proportional
(r=0.57).  The latter correlation was anticipated, since both elements are
adjacent members of Group 5A.

     The multimedia filter removed 10 percent (mean) or 14 percent (median)
of the influent arsenic, and the carbon column removed 5 percent (means)
or 10 percent (medians), although no removal patterns or correlations were
observed in either unit.  The entire alum treatment train effected a net
arsenic removal of 49 percent (mean) to 51 percent (median).  Only 1 per-
cent of the train influent samples exceeded the EPA drinking water MCL of
0.05 mg/1, with none of the succeeding samples ever reaching this value.

     Frequency distributions for arsenic concentrations in the activated
sludge influent and the product water are shown in Figure 32.  Only about 2
percent of the samples in the activated sludge influent exceeded the National
Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NIPDWR) arsenic Criterion  and
the median product water concentration was about one-tenth of the NIPDWR MCL.

Boron

     Boron was refractory to the alum coagulation treatment sequence, the
net mean and median removals being only 3 percent. Slight increases occurred
through the Densator and filter, offset by removals in the activated
sludge unit and carbon column.  It should be noted that the magnitude of
these variations is well within analytical error.

Barium
     As the probability distributions in Figure 33 clearly demonstrate, both
biological and chemical (alum) treatment removed some barium.  Mean and
median removals were 51 percent and 60 percent in the up-flow clarifier.
Filtration and carbon adsorption had little, if any, effect on barium,
and no removal patterns in any unit process could be identified.  The high-
est observed concentration, found in the train influent, was only
0.48 mg/l—well below the EPA drinking water MCL of 1.0 mg/1.

Beryllium
     Analysis for beryllium was performed once a week over a 6-month period
from June through October of 1973.  Only 15 out of 23 train influent samples
had detectable concentrations, the highest being 0.04  yg/1.   Only one out
of nineteen Densator effluent samples contained beryllium in  a detectable
concentration, that being 0.01   yg/1   Absolutely no correlations could be
developed in the case of beryllium.  There was a net mean reduction of 0.004
 Vig/1  through the treatment train, but no change in the median concentrations,

Calcium
     Activated sludge removal of calcium was 6 percent and 7 percent of the

                                   102

-------
                                                                          UJ
                                                                          O
                                                                          UJ
                                                                          UJ
                                                                          O
                                                                          X
                                                                          UJ
                                                                          -
                                                                          ea
                                                                            •
                                         O >>
                                         :0ertsator ari-sing probably
 from cobalt contamination in the lime.  ...    '    '•'   -'•     '
                                                  *;." .• \
   .  Relatively little  change in cobaltvcpncentmtiQhs :6ccur,red through  the
multimedia and carbon   filters.  RemoyaH;'as,Mg'h^asv6^-percent were ob-
tained on virgin carbon,  but fell off  rap^d1^Ja/:the-^'/irjqrea'5ed ;
Reductions through the  carbon also exhibited^ve^wea^concentration :
effect.  Train influent and  effluent d i stations --are 'a.lrobst identical  in
the  upper 30-percentile, but  very dissimi'lar.inithe  'tbwsr^^ ZO-percentile,  as
shown  in Figure 35.                 ,;  -..  •:'• ;,^--j,.;••'•-*.• '--i  ••,  .^          '


Chromium                              ;;  '-/• 'f•',•'.'"• '5"^':''''.•:''.'";•?••>
	'	                        •    •::"•,.'••--'',  -^._ .'*,'.">;«.'.'. ' ,'• I-*';-*

     Probability distributions for chromium'concentrations-are  s'hown« in
Figure 36.                             v  •-.'..- '•''-',."'.;• •''".•..''•'- ••'-'}"•""  ,.


     Mean and  median removals of chromium-were bo%h;-72:percent .throuah

-------

,  .''" •   •'   ,'' ^ ;•''[' '->/."  ,'"v •   -"



























1

1
; r
(
E







—I
*
t->
O
=c
1
1




(]_
LU
: •
,1^
O
I
1




V _ pl',
. •'• •'
«»-
«f-
.i ' •**J
• u
. -O
; ^ ' •'
'« » ' " *
J '.»*
• •'"
* " ' '
___


.•:;', i<5v
:»:• •*.:','
^ . •
[ ;' ca
'•"'*' ^^

i|5f;
•;;> „
(


- '• ' * ,
'*;:"i,^
"v-''1^,:
;--:'; V... '•'
• /::V '•''('•• »',•''
'••'.','• • •'.'.'•
'''••'': /
^'..^-£:
J


;<


/







..
/


'"••••


,,

/





*.,"*''


/








X


. ,




X


y
r^*



/

j

£
\f*





' ' .

9 ^^
	 - _ ._ _._ -



^
r .«***
.••'•'/'


--.-
CT^
Oi
cn
en
E
o^ ro
Q E
1x1 -^
ID LU
CTl jjj «
o -°
o g S_
CT> L ^^ ^5
tl
° ° ^
co Q C
'^ —t "r~i
r- i •*-*
o S 5
P- TL
                                                                                           Q
                                                                                           LU
                                                                                           Q
                                                                                           O
                                                                                           X
                                                                                           O
                                                                                           o
                                                                                           LU
                                                                                                  res
                                                                                                  E
                                                                                                  td
                                                                                                  O
                                                                                                  S-
                                                                                                  o
                                                                                           CD    .^
 s-
 4->
 t/1

•o
                                                                                           LU
                                                                                           03
PROBAB
                                                                                                   c -a
                                                                                                   
                                                                                                   cr co

                                                                                                   s-  c
                                                                                                  M-  O

                                                                                                  T3 *+J
                                                                                                   O)  (C
                                                                                                  4J •—
                                                                                                   O  3
                                                                                                   a>  en
                                                                                                  i— re
                                                                                                   a>  o
                                                                                                  co  o
                                                                                                  CO
                                                                                                   CD
                                                                                                   C7>

-------
CO
4->
O
 i—
                                                                  o   « cn
                                                                  o   •§ §
                                                                  LU   00
                                                                          -    -.--o
                                                                  I—    T3 E
                                                             o    i-j      ,0
                                                                  CO

                                                                  O
                                                                  Q_
                                                                                   tt) (U
                                                                                   3 3
                                                                                   
-------
 1.000
0.100
   g

   LU
   o
   o
   o
 0.010
  0.001


X^













	







v^


— ^.


'•.
NS^





— —








^5

•***



*..
\




••• «•••••

• ^^B*^H






-s







\

• Ac

• Ac
De
• Cr






^^
^"^X

^*5i



•.

^
•t S'

:t. S
ms.
irb. (









*^




-.
^
1. Ir

1. El
Iff.








^


***%





if

7f.

Fff








^


S
*


*%'













N



s,
N

«
	 5












\




x

* ^
S












s





***



N











-NS


i —

^

i —


\
N










S
S


L
'

«.


I
\
\













^^






s
N
                    PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED

           Figure  36.   Frequency distributions for chromium,
                       alum  coagulation  study.
                                   108

-------
               n    !"** 65,^d 69 percent  throu9h  alL™  clarification.   Reduc-
                    t0r exh1bited a  strong concentration  effect  (r=

                                            effluent            '
                  remova1::  of  a  lesser magnitude were accomplished through
  ™™i «•  •  perc?nt  ^ me,ans and 30 percent by medians.  The chromium
  removal efficiency  increased with TSS removal efficiency, and the reductions
  in chromium through the filter exhibited a concentration effect (r=0 5?)
  & s)y ^bo"fij^^^" Averaged 13 percent (means) In  8 percen?  '
  and fa?? nn n5/ ^"^ons exhibiting a weak concentration effect (r-0.41).
  and falling off sharply at NH3-N concentrations greater than about 1 5 ma/1
  Approximately 95 percent of  the train influent samples exceeded the EPA
  drinking water MCL of 0.05 mg/1 for chromium and 2 percent of the train
  effluent samples exceeded the limit in spite of the relatively high net train
  removal of 93 percent (means) or 94 percent (medians)             9

  Copper       .

      The activated sludge unit was the most effective  copper removal  orocess
 with mean and median removals of 84 and 83 percent  respectively   A urn  coaa
  plat on  removed 37tPercent  (mean) and 50 percent (median)  of the  amount  9"

           c=^naL"^^

                                                   .t
 fluent   but  one  out  of  65  samples  slightly exceeded the EPA Secondary
 Regulations  recommendation of  1.0  mg/1.                     secondary
 Iron
     Both mean and median removals through the multimedia filters averaaed
17 percent, effluent iron being proportional  to effluent TSS (r=0 6lT and
the reductions exhibiting a concentration effect (r-0 57)   Carbon adsorb
tion reduced the median concentration by only 0.20 mg/1   but redSctionsfn

              anadVe209oedrLOU?hly V  ^  ^ ^»j -Sia^^m v°   s^
              and 20 percent,  carbon removed  about 70
                                    109

-------
      The frequency distributions were log-normal  on  all  sample  sites within
 the train and the net  mean and median removals were  both 93. percent.
 Approximately 98 percent of the train influent samples  contained  iron  in
 exS of 0.3 mg/1, whereas none of the train effluent  samples  ever reached
 that level.

 Mercury

      As shown bv the probability distributions in Figure 37, most of the
mercury removal ywUhiS?he train was accomplished by the activated sludge
process, 51 percent  (mean) to 59 percent (median).  Two extreme values  n
the Densator  effluent resulted  in an apparent mean increase of 0.06 vg/1 ,
contrasted with a  40-percent median removal , the reductions exhibited a
roncentrltion effect (r=0.82).   Increases in mercury occurred in 20 percent
of  the paired simples! always coinciding with  low influent concentrations.


                     ^^
 tKgh the train.   Approximately 4 percent  of  the  train  influent samples
 exceeded the EPA drinking water MCL of 0.002 mg/1,  as  did 3  percent of the
 train effluent samples.

 Potassium

       Small amounts of potassium were removed  through  the alum train.  Mean
 removals  were 5 percent by activated sludge,  1 percent by alum clarification,
 2 percent by filtration, 5 percent by carbon adsorption,  and 13 percent  over-

 all.

 Magnesium
   p
were
       Magnesium like potassium, was partially and
 through the alum train.  The net mean and median removal
 only 5 percent and 2 percent, respectively.

 Manganese

       Almost equal amounts  of manganese were removed by every unit in the
 treatment  sequence.  Mean and median  removal efficiencies both averaged 34
 percent  in the activated sludge unit, and  32 percent and 25 percent in the
 Sensator  the reductions in the latter exhibited a conce ntration effect
  (r=0.58).   Removal efficiency was  directly proportional to pH  (£-0.37), the
  lowest removals  occurring at PH<7.0, the  highest removals at pH  >8.0.

       Multimedia filtration removed an additional 19 percent  (median) to 26
  percent  median),  the  reductions. exhibited a concentration effect  (r=0.52)
  and increased  s   ghtly with TSS removal  efficiency.  Carbon filtration  re-
  mSved 24 and 32  plrcent of  its  mean and  median influent concentrations.

                                       no

-------
10.00






1.00




en
3.
I-H
C£
Lul
o
o
o
0.10





0.01
2



Ir 	 ! 	
*.
^k «
^» .
v^
^














5






^
k^
1
^v-
~Y$
*v










10








^S


•^,
V"«
S,








ib









s


s
i*'
\







2U










^


N
^







30











X,


^







40





•1


|
,
	

N


•






bO





mmmm mm







\

V






60





i^n mtmm

• ^^mmm






\

y-J
.V
. ^.
• ^
».

70





Act
Act

Den
- Car







k
%
A

^
\
:\
80





«.
<;

s.
h.










\
\


85





1. 'J
1 [

Erf.
Col












\
\
90





Inf.
-ff
• ii*
Eff.













\
95








	 , 	 r_













98
         PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED
Ftgure 37.   Frequency distributions for mercury,  alum
            coagulation study.
                         m

-------
      The net tratn removals of manganese came to 73 percent (mean)  and 75
oercent (median).  It appears, however, that the reductions through the
tSent sequence were relatively constant at about 0,06 mg/1, regardless
of the Influent concentration.  The Secondary Regulations recommendation of
0.05 mg/1 was exceeded by 100 percent of the train Influent samples and 4
percent of the train effluent samples.

Molybdenum

      The activated sludge unit removed 94 percent of the total molybdenum
removed by the alum treatment sequence.  The removal efficiency th™ugh,the
unit was 80 percent (means) and 79 percent [medians).  Alum coagulation
reduced the concentration by about 1 wg/l  Which represents a removal  effic-
iency of 26 percent (means and medians").  The reductions were  linearly de-
pendent upon the  Influent concentrations  (r«Q,70), and declined sharply
as effluent TSS exceeded about  10 mg/1.

      During multimedia filtration there  were mean and median  ^creases of
22 percent and 25 percent, followed  by removals of  16 percent  and 2 percent
during  carbon filtration.  Overall,  the train effected a mean  reyoval of  85
percent and  a median  removal  of 81 percent.  Frequency distributions  for
molybdenum are shown  in Figure  38.

Sodium
       Sodium was neither added nor removed during  alum treatment.   Overall,
 there was a 6 percent mean and a 2 percent median  removal  through  the  treat-
 ment sequence, the highest removals occurred in the activated  s  udge and
 carbon column units.  The maximum train effluent concentration was 125 mg/1,
 which exceeded the mean concentration by about 45  percent.

 Nickel	
       Almost 2/3 of the nickel removed in the alum train was accomplished  .
 during biological treatment.  The Densator removed 14 percent of the mean- and
 median concentrations.  Multimedia filtration failed to change the^median
 nickel concentration, but there was a slight (3 percent) Increase in the mean
 Carbon adsorption removed an additional 17 percent by both mean and median,
 the reductions exhibiting a concentration effect (r=0.50).  The frequency
 distribution on all effluents appeared to be bimodal and devoid of extreme
 values, as indicated in Figure 39.

 Lead

       As those data in Figure 40 indicate, lead was removed chiefly in the
 activated sludge unit, but  some removal was observed in the Densator.  Mean
 and median removals were 56 percent and 64 percent through activated sludge,
 22 percent and 25  percent through alum clarification.  Reductions in the
 latter exhibited a concentration effect  (r=0.42)5 and in general appeared to
 decline with the occasional turbidity and suspended solids breakthroughs.
 Multimedia and carbon filtration effected only minor removals,  in many cases
 zero  or negative.
                                       112

-------
100.0
 10.0
 en
 P.
ce:



LoJ
o
o
  1.0
 0.1






\















^r
^




X
	 -A
















I
\
X

s
V •
^

















^
y

s^

S.

















V
S,

N
•.
Si
*
















X


•v
s^
\
• %
•-..















\




\
^N..
•„











Ml



V-
X




SN
'••*,










M^HMMM




V
\
\



A










— I
_ __
. -LU I
.... [
	 (




k
\
\
-..
^**.
• •
•
•


\
\
\
\
^



\et
1^4-
ALL
Jen
>rl






1,
\
\
H"
1
~h
»
\
•
«.
\


. si
C1
. o 1
3. t-
D. C(







-\-
— \



»
*
•
*
*
*
t
\


. Inf
E-C-C
. ttt
ff.
3l. E1










L
\
\
\
^
^





rf.














I

10   15 20   30   40   50  60   70   80 85  90     95
                                                                   98
                PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED


      Figure 38.  Frequency  distributions for molybdenum, alum

                  coagulation study.
                                 113

-------
     o
r-   O
c/o
      •
 •   -Q
+J   S-
O   (O
«C   O
                                             /
                                     ,'
                                                   t
                                             2l
                                                                                       0
                                                                                       4->
                                                                                       CO
                                                                                    Q 0>
                                                                                    LU «O
                                                                                    Q 0
                                                                                    UJ O
X  3
LU i—
    fO

O   "

Q  

                                                                    O
                                                                02

                                                                IO-
                                                                CS
                                                                03  ^
                                                                2  %
                                                                §  S
                                                                D-  3
                                                                    cr
                                                                    d)
                                                                                        co
                                                                                        O)
C3
o
                 «o

                 o
                                                                            o
                                                                              o
                                                                            o
                              L/6tu  '
                                           114

-------
                                                                                            -TJ

                                                                                             3
                                                                                            4->
                                                                                             (A


                                                                                             C

                                                                                             °
                                                                                             fO
                                                                                          or;
                                                                                          UJ =*
                                                                                          Q 2>
                                                                                          LU tO
                                                                                          m O
                                                                                          O "

                                                                                          UJ E

                                                                                          D; """
                                                                                          o «*

                                                                                          Q  *
                                                                                          UJ ^
                                                                                          CD  w
                                                                                          ^^  c

                                                                                          UJ  O
                                                                                         U.  =
                                                                                         r-i -Q
                                                                                             ««
                                                                                         CO
                                                                                         <
                                                                                         CO
                                                                                             0)

                                                                                            U.
                                                                                             i.


                                                                                             D5
                                                                                            •r-
                                                                                            LU
O
O
O

O
                               L/&U '

-------
     The distribution of lead at all sample sites was log-normal with no
extreme values.  The EPA drinking water MCL of 0.05 mg/1 was exceeded in 91
percent of the train influent samples and in  22 percent of the train
effluent samples.

Selenium
     Mean and median removals of selenium through the activated sludge unit
were 77 and 83 percent, respectively.  Chemical treatment effected a :mean
removal of 11 percent while the median concentration dropped from 0.5 .jig/1
to zero, indicating 100 percent removal.  Approximately 48 percent of the
Densator effluent samples had nonzero concentrations of selenium i.e.,
greater than the observable detection limit of 1 yg/1.

     The mean selenium concentration appeared to increase during filtration.
and drop during carbon adsorption.  The former case is a reflection of
extreme values in the upper ten percentile, whereas the mean removal through
carbon adsorption (52 percent) was sufficient to overcome the apparent addi-
tion in the filter., Reductions in concentration through the carbon column
exhibited a well-defined concentration effect (r=0.79).  Eleven percent df
the train influent samples exceeded the NIPDWR standard of 0.10 mg/1,
compared to zero percent in all succeeding samples.  Frequency distributions
are shown in Figure 41.

Silicon
     Little or no removal of silicon occurred within the alum treatment train,
The multimedia filter, which effected a larger removal than the other unit
processes, removed only 10 percent (mean) or 7 percent (median).  Overall,
there was a 3-percent mean removal and a 10-percent median addition through
the train.

Vanadium

     Vanadium was slightly removed, but only by biological and chemical
treatment.  Mean and median removals were 13 percent and 15 percent through
the activated sludge unit, 8 and 9 percent through the Densator, 12 and 23
percent through the entire train.  The removals failed to correlate with
other parameters.

Zinc

     During the months of December 1972 through May 1973 there were six
occasions when the train influent contained more than 1.0 mg/1 zinc.  These
were  the only months  in the 20-month period in which this occurred.   It was
assumed that these incidents were related to industrial  activity.  In all
cases the activated sludge unit was able to significantly reduce the effluent
concentration to ambient, or average background levels.  . The greatest re-
movals within the treatment train occurred in the activated sludge unit, 70
percent by means and 63 percent by medians.  Mean and median removals during
chemical treatment were 30 and 42 percent, respectively.  Reduction through
the Densator exhibited a concentration effect (r=0.70),  and removal

                                     116

-------
efficiency dropped off sharply when effluent turbidity exceeded about 2,0
r IU •

     Multtmedta filtration removed about 3 percent tmean) of the zinc, yet
there was a simultaneous increase of Q.Q2 mg/1 (by median).  It appears that
there was not a substantial shift In concentrations, although the filter did
a good job of damping extreme values.  The reductions In zinc by filtration
exhibited a strong concentration effect (HJ.87)..  Removal of zinc by
carbon adsorption was consistent,.and averaged 37 percent more by carbon
adsorption than by multimedia filtration, and the reductions were concentra-
tion-dependent (r»0.77).  Also, the removals and reductions of zinc were
proportional to the organic loading on the carbon (X/M), Indicating a
possible organic ligand effect.  All sample sites except the train effluent
had varying degrees of extreme values whose distribution patterns were
difficult to identify.  However, the final effluent distribution can be
considered log-normal.  The maximum concentration of zinc ever observed
was 4.1 mg/1 (train Influent); hence, all samples were well below the
Secondary Regulations recommendation of 5.0 mg/1.
                                    117

-------
100.0
  10,0  -
O
t-l
h:
LU
O

O
O
    1,0
    0.1











1
•




















\




(
V
i-
\

















s
"S






^
'V™


















\
\




s
r~^
*
14
*
V
*




















s.
S



\
•
»
t
\
>
*.
\


















v
\


\
«
•
•
i
*
\
\

















\


^
\
\
' '
«
t

«
*

















\






\
\
••A
\'-
\
\




^ia_!i
— •
• •••








s,
^1








x
\
V-.




— Ai
— A<
"• D(
•"** C<


















X




k* U •
:t.
3ns
irb









SL
\
\
\
1









SI.
SI.
. Ef
. Co













,

I
\
\
1




Inf.
Eff.
f.
1. Ef1

















,., , ,.,
\



h 	


F.



















               5    10  15  20    30   40   50   60   70   80 85  90    95     98

                   PROBABILITY  OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED

           Figure  41.   Frequency distributions for selenium,
                        alum coagulation study.
                                    118

-------
                               SECTION  8

                       HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION AND
                       SINGLE-STAGE RECARBONATION
GENERAL
     This phase of the research effort was necessitated by the absence of
any effluent pH adjustment in the previous high-pH lime coagulation study.
Since it is neither practical  nor desirable to discharge an effluent with
a median pH value of 11.5, and since the possible effects of the high-pH
effluent on the performance of the filtration and adsorption processes were
relatively undefined, the decision was made to repeat the high-pH lime
coagulation studies and incorporate single-stage recarbonation.

     The alum coagulation study was terminated on October 30, 1973, at which
time the up-flow clarifier was drained, washed down,  and promptly returned
to service for operation in the high-pH lime coagulation mode.

     The single-stage recarbonation basin was fabricated from-a  galvanized
steel tank and a C02 diffusion grid .ws.made  of  1/2-tach PVC  drilled with
small holes.  Pure C02 was metered from a 5,700 kg (12,500 Ib.)  receiver
into the bottom of the tank through a pressure regulator and flowmeter.
Feed pressure was always in excess of 50 psi, and rate was adjusted by the
operator as required in order to maintain an effluent pH of 6.5  to 7.0.
The up-flowc^lfier effluent  flowed by gravity into the bottom of the
recarbonation basin and over-flowed out the top through a V-notdr weir which
produced a co-current contacting arrangement.  The neutralized effluent was
then pumped to the No. 1 multimedia filter.

     The recarbonation basin was operated off-line from November through
December 9 for de-bugging purposes.  During this time a portion  of the high-
pH effluent went ta the recarbonation basin, arid the  other portion was
routed to the filter gallery for filtration and carbon adsorption;  On
December 10 the recarbonated effluent was piped into  the filter  gallery for
the first time, and this operating mode was maintained until the termination
of the project. The inclusive dates for the recarbonated high-pH lime
coagulation study were November 2, 1973 through January 31, 1974, although
the filter and carbon column did not come on line until December 10.
Because this was a relatively short period of investigation, the sampling
frequency for metals analyses was increased from twice per week  to daily,
and the  individual processes were monitored very  closely to assure good
process control.
                                   119

-------
      The process configuration and mean flows through the respective unit
 processes are shown in Figure 42.  As in the two previous.phases of the
 project, the most significant process change was in the chemical treatment
 utilized.

      The performance of the treatment sequence was excellent, and Table 36
 presents an abbreviated summary of the means of selected water quality
 parameters.  COD, 8005, and TSS concentrations all exhibited reductions
 greater than 98.4 percent.  The reductions in bacterial densities   were
 very good, although not as dramatic as the kills observed during the high-
 pH lime coagulation phase.  This particular point will be addressed in the
 following sections.

      Figure 43 presents frequency distributions for the observed COD con-
 centrations in the raw wastewater, the activated sludge effluent, and the
 final product water.  When presented in this manner, the relative improve-
 ment in water quality due to secondary treatment, and due to advance waste-
 water treatment can be readily assessed.  The median COD concentrations
 for the raw wastewater, activated sludge effluent, and carbon column
 effluent were 500, 45, and 5 mg/1, respectively.  These data indicate ex-
 cellent process performance and an overall COD reduction of about 99 per-
 cent.  Extreme values did exist in the observed COD concentrations.  The
 ninety-five percentile values indicated a product water COD concentration
 of 60 mg/1; however, the corresponding COD in the activated sludge effluent
 was 120 mg/1, and the raw wastewater COD was approaching 1000 mg/1.  Under
 these conditions the AWT processes provided a COD reduction of 60 mg/1, or
 a §0~pe£cent reduction in the COD of the activated sludge effluent.

      Figure 44 presents the probability distributions for observed TSS
 concentrations at selected points in the treatment sequence.  These data
 indicate that control of product water suspended solids was very effective.
 The median TSS concentration in the product water was 3 mg/1 (4 mg/1 mean),
 and in 40 percent of the samples there were no detectable suspended solids.

 COMPLETELY-MIXED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM

      During this portion of the research effort the performance of the
 completely-mixed activated sludge (CMAS) system was not as good,as one
 would have liked in that the effluent TSS averaged 44 mg/1,, which resulted
 in effluent BODs and COD concentrations of 38 and 65 mg/1,  respectively.
 The performance is summarized in Table 37, and the hydraulic operation
 and process control parameters are given in. Table 38.

      During this portion of the study the mean sludge age was 13.2 days and
the  wastewater temperature averaged 21°C.  The major operational difficulty
experienced was obtaining good liquid/solids separation in the secondary
clarifier, since the mixed liquor was denitrifying and rising to some
degree during most of this phase of the project.  The return sludge flow
was increased in an effort to remove the sludge from the anaerobic conditions
in the clarifier bottom as quickly as possible; this action  did significantly
improve the problem of rising sludge.  A subjective evaluation of the oper-
ation of the activated sludge system indicates that the sludge age was.

                                     120

-------
 C\J
o
o
 en
 c
 o
•i—
•P
 (0
 c
 o
1Q
 i.  C
 re -r-
 o          »p—  Q)
          •p -P
00        r-i—
           D T-
                                            CD
U
OJ
to
          E C
          O E
         .a rs
          S-i—
          (0 O
         oo
                                                                                 0)
                                                                                 cn
                                                                                 to
                                                                                 •p
                                                                                 10
                                                                                  cn
                                                                                  c
                                                                                  c cn
                                                                                  Or—
                                                                                 •r"
                                                                                 •P   «
                                                                                  fO r—
                                                                                  cn >,
                                                                                  to  £
                                                                                  O  re
                                                                                  O  D
                                                                                     C
                                                                                  (L)  re
                                                                                 •r—
                                                                                 r-
                                                                                    co
                                                                                  i  cn
                                                                                 .c i—
                                                                                  cn
                                                                                 •r-  '«
                                                                                 X (M

                                                                                     S-
                                                                                  ..  0)
                                                                                  C JO
                                                                                  O  E
                                                                                 •r-  
                                                                                  rO  O
                                                                                  s-z:
                                                                                  D
                                                                                  D") •"
                                                                                 •r-  C
                                                                                 4-  O
                                                                                  E T-
                                                                                  O -P
                                                                                  O  (0
                                                                                     C
                                                                                  10  o
                                                                                  CO J3
                                                                                  <1J  S-
                                                                                  O  ro
                                                                                  O  O
                                                                                  S-  0)
                                                                                 a.  s-
                                                                                 CM



                                                                                  s_

                                                                                  cn
                                                                                 •r-
                                                                                 U.
                                  121

-------
TABLE 36.
SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY DATA FOR THE
HIGH-pH  LIME COAGULATION AND RECARBONATION
STUDY.

Parameter
COD
BOD5
TSS
TDS
NH3-N
Org. N
N02 & N03-N
N02-N
Total P
pH, Units
Std. Plate Count
per ml
Total Coliforms
per 100 ml
Fecal Conforms
Raw
Waste
Water
(mg/1)
526
198
245
742
17.0
11.9
<0.5
--
—
7.5
—
__
--
Final
Product
(mg/1)
8
2
4
637
2.7
1.1
10.8
0.12
0.9
6.8
3.3 x 103
1.3 x 102
59
Removal
(percent)
98.5
99.0
98.4
14.2
84.1
90.8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
per 100 ml

N/A:  Not Applicable

- : Not  Available
                                 122

-------
  100.0
  100.0
D)
E
Q
o
u
     10.0
      1.0
Raw Wastewater


Recarb. Eff.


Carb. Col. Eff.

                                                   «
                          7
                    10  15  20   30   40   50  60 '   70   80  85   90    95     98
                   PROBABILITY OF BEING  EQUALLED  OR  EXCEEDED


          Figure 43.  Frequency distributions for selected COD data;

                      high-pH lime coagulation and recarbonation study.
                                   123

-------
1000.0
  100,0
CO
CO
    10.0
      1.0
    i  i     i    i    r   L
          Raw Wastewater


	    Act. SI. Eff.

	  Carb. Col. Eff.

                                     «
                                                Z
        2     5     10  15 20    30   40   50   60   70   80 85  90    95    98


                   PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED


     Figure 44.   Frequency distributions for selected TSS data;
                 high-pH lime coagulation and recarbonation study.
                                 124

-------
TABLE 37.    PERFORMANCE SUMMARY OF THE COMPLETELY-MIXED
             ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM,  HIGH-pH  LIME
             COAGULATION AND RECARBONATION STUDY.
— - „- 	 _ 	 .
Parameter
COD
TOC, Soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SC umho/cm
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+N03-N
N02.N
Total P
pH, units
T. AIL, as CaC03
P. AIL, as CaC03
Std. Plate Count
per ml
Total Coliforms
per 100 ml
Activated
Sludge
Influent
•(mg/1)
217
27
69
133
557
851
14.5
9.1
0.9
0.11
10.2
7.2
215
0
1.9 x 106
1.4 x 10?
Fecal Coliforms 4.2 x 106
per 100 ml
N/A : Not Applicable '
Activated
Sludge
Effluent
(mg/1 )
65
, 11
38
44
536
762
1.9
4.4
9.9
0.053
7.4
7.1
129
0
9.3 x 103
3.2 x 105
2.5 x 104
Reduction
(percent)
70.0
59.3
44.9
66.9
3.8
10.5
86.9
5,1.3
N/A
51.8
27.5
N/A
40.0
0
99.5
97.7
99.4
                               125

-------
TABLE  3a. PROCESS SUMMARY FOR THE COMPLETELY - MIXED
           ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM, HIGK-pH LIME
           COAGULATION AND RECARBONATION STUDY
                       HYDRAULIC OPERATION
           Q  (influent)
           Q  (influent)

           Q  (waste)

           Aeration T
           Clarifier Overflow  Rate(Qj)
           Weir  loading

           Clarifier T  (Qi + Qr)
           Clarifier T  (Qj)
                          PROCESS  CONTROLS
           MLSS
           MLVSS
           RAS
           SVI
           Air supplied

           D. 0.
           D. 0. Uptake Rate
           F/M (COD)
           F/M (SOC)
           F/M
            Sliidge Age
           Temperature
8.9 I/sec
     gpnr)
11.2 I/sec
(180 gpm)
2797 I/day
(739 gpd)
1.70 hour
11.7 m3/day-m2
(287 gal/ft2 -day)
27.7 m3/day-m
(2231 gal/ft-day)
3.3 hours
7.5 hours

4287mg/l
2915 mg/1
7649 mg/1
196 mg/1
23.32 I/sec
(494 scfm)
4.7 mg/1
25.8 mg/l-hr.
0.288 day -1
0.028 day
0.073 day
13.2 days
219 C
 (70°F)
           -1
                                 126

-------
probably 3 to 5 days too  old  during this time, and increased sludge wastage
would probably  have  improved system  stability.

     Nitrification was desired during this phase of the prbject; however
^arithmetic mean of 1.9 mg/1 NH3-N in the effluent indicates that
notification was rather erratic.  Figure 45 presents probability distribu-
tions for the NH3-N data at selected points in the treatment sequence.  It is
interesting to note the large difference between the mean (1.9 mg/1) and the
median NH3-N concentration of 0.2 mg/1.  The agreement between the mean
  2 & N03-N concentration of 9.9 mg/1, and the median concentration (about
12 mg/1) is much better.  The data in Figure 46 Indicate  that these data
closely approximate log-normal  probability distributions, and the mean and
median values should be reasonably close.

     As stated earlier the average COD and BODs concentrations were high, 65
and 38 mg/1,  respectively, and  the problem was attibuted to poor liquid-
solids separation  in the final  clarifier.  The data in Figure 47 clearly
indicate the  affect that effluent TSS had on the effluent COD
                                   127

-------
100.0
  10.0
o>
    U>l             10  15 20   3d   40  50  60   70   80  85  90    95


                  PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED
    Figure  45.   Frequency distributions for selected NH^-N data;
                high-pH  lime coagulation and recarbonation study.
                                  128

-------
 100.0
 O)
 E  •
    10.0
o3


0°"
    1.0
                                 Act. SI. Eff.

                                 Recarb. Eff.
                       	  Carb. Col. Eff.
                                       /
        2      5     10  15 20   30   40  50  60   70   80  85  90    95     98
                  PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED

 Figure  46.   Frequency distributions for selected nitrate-nitrite
              nitrogen  data;  high-pH lime coagulation and recarbonation
              study.
                                  129

-------
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             o
                                                                                               •
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             00
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             in
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             o

                                                                                             o
                                                                                             CTi
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             o
                                                                                                  00
                                                                                                  00
                                                                                                  r-
                                                                                             O
                                                                                             o

                                                                                             o
                                                                                             oo
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             o
o
LO
O
CM
o
  •
o
                   O
                   VD
O
CO
O
  •

O
                                                                                                         0)
                                                                                                         p
                                                                                          00
                                                                                          P 3
                                                                                             •P
                                                                                          i- 
                                                                                          O
                                                                                          M- C
                                                                                             O

                                                                                          00 -P
                                                                                          iH™ fO

                                                                                          •P O

                                                                                          S J-
                                                                                          3 13
                                                                                          i— O

                                                                                          f- i-
                                                                                          (U

                                                                                          co c
                                                                                          3  T-

                                                                                          Q 03
                                                                                          Or-
                                                                                          O 3
                                                                                             D)
                                                                                          P to
                                                                                          C O
                                                                                          
-------
UPFLOW  CLARIFIER

     Table 39 summarizes  the performance of the upflow clarifier  (Infilco
Densator), and Table  40summarizes the operation of the process.  During
this phase of the research effort lime was fed as the primary coagulant,
and 12  mg/1 of ferric chloride  (as FeCl3) was fed as a floatation aid.

     The process performed about as anticipated, with notable exception of
the very high effluent TSS concentration (75 mg/1).  The effluent solids
seemed  to be unsettled floe, and the VSS concentration was always less
than 5  mg/1 which indicates that the upflow clarifier effectively captured
the solids carryover from the activated sludge system.

     The high effluent TSS concentrations can be attributed to a lime dose
that was inadequate for obtaining proper coagulation/flocculation.  The
target  pH value for operation of the up-flow clarifier was 11.3, since
previous studies had indicated  that excellent coagulation was obtained at
that pH value.  The average pH  value of 10.5 produced an effluent that was
poorly  coagulated and very turbid.  A lime shipment was received just prior
to the  start of this phase that had a CaO content of only 45 percent  .
(76 percent was typical)  and contained large quantities of grit.  The lime
fed poorly, and these difficulties resulted in consistent underfeeding.

     Very significant reductions in bacterial densities were observed
during  this phase of the  project as a result of the high-pH  lime coagula-
tion process.  Even though the  mean (arithmetic) pH of the Densator
effluent was only 10.5 a  total  coliform reduction of almost five logs was
observed.

SINGLE-STAGE RECARBONATION

     The recarbonation basin was operated at an average flow of 3.2 liters/
sec (50 gpm) which resulted in  a theoretical  residence time of 31 minutes.
With an average CO? dose  of 460 mg/1  the basin performed reasonably well
as the  data in Table 41  indicate.

     The major difficulty encountered in the  operation of this process was
the calcium carbonate scaling of the  PVC piping used for the influent and
scale build-up on the impeller  of the effluent pump.  This was a very
major problem, even though the  piping and pump were acid washed every
three days with dilute HC1.

     The reduction in TSS can be attributed to both resolubilization of
CaC03 and settling.   The settling of  TSS in the basin made it necessary
to remove sludge by bucket and rope about once a month.

     No meaningful  changes were observed in the gross organic water quality
parameters or in the mean concentrations of the various  forms of nitrogen.
However, substantial changes were noted in  the observed  bacterial  densities.
Approximately a one and one-half log  increase was observed for the
standard plate counts and for coliform organisms.
                                  131

-------
TABLE 39.
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE UPFLOW
CLARIFIER,  HIGH-pH  LIME COAGULATION  AND
RECARBONATION STUDY

Parameter
COD
TOC, soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SC, ymho/cm
NH3 -N
Org. N
N02+N03 -N
N02 -N
Total P
pH units
T. Alk. as CaC03
P. Alk. as CaC03<
Std. Plate Count
per ml
Total Col i forms
per 100 ml
Fecal Col i forms
per 100 ml
N/A: Not Applicable
Activated
Sludge
Effluent
N/1 )
65
11
38
44
536
762
1.90
4.43
9.9
0.053
7.4
7.1
129
0
9.3 x 103

3.2 x 105

2.5 x 104


Densator
Effluent
(mg/1 )
28
9
4 '
75
633
1084
2.70
1.92
10.7
0.096
1.3
10.5
204
130
18

1 8

6


Reduction
(percent)
56.9
18.2
89.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
56.7
N/A
N/A
82.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
99.8

99.997

99.98


                               132

-------
TABLE  40.     PROCESS SUMMARY FOR THE UPFLOW CLARIFIER,
               HIGH-pH  LIME COAGULATION AND RECARBONATION
               STUDY
             Q (influent)

             Q (recycle)   .

             Q (waste)

             Mixing T
                    G
             Settling T
             Clarifier overflow rate

             Weir loading

             Lime dose
                   dose
6.9 I/sec
(110 gpm)
0.9 I/sec
(14 gpm)
8248 I/day
(2179 gpd)
6.9 min.
       _1
67 sec.
3.5 hours
31.9 m3/day-m2
(784 gal/ft2-day)
35.8 m3/day-m
2880 gal/ft-day)
279 mg/1
12 mg/1
                                133

-------
 TABLE 41.       PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE RECARBONATION
                 BASIN,  HIGH-pH   LIME COAGULATION  AND
                 RECARBONATION SYSTEM

Parameter
COD
TOC, Soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SC, ymho/cm
NH3 -N
Org. N
N02 +N03 -N
N02 -N
Total P
pH, units
T. Alk. as CaCOo
0
P. Alk. as CaCOo
0
Std. Plate Count
•*
Densator
Effluent
(mg/D
28
9
4
75
633
1084
2.70
1.92
10.7
0.096
1.3
10.5
204
130
18
Recarb
Effluent
(mg/1)
27
9
5
33
598
919
2.36
2.21
9.5
0.118
1.0
7.0
221
12
2.3 x 103
Reduction
(percent)
3.6
0.0
N/A
56.0
5.5
15.2
12.6
N/A
11.2
22.9
23.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
per ml

Total Colifroms
per 100 ml

Fecal Coliforms
per 100 ml

N/A:  Not Applicable
2.3 x 102    N/A


1.7 x 102    N/A
                               134

-------
     The increased bacterial populations were attributed to recontamina-
tion of the basin during those periods when the lime feed to the up-flow
clarifier was interrupted.  When this interruption occurred the pH in the
Densator decreased to neutral values and large numbers of organisms passed
to the recarbonation basin.  When lime feed to the Densator was reestab-
lished, the high-pH did not influence the microorganisms in
the recarbonation basin  since it was always operated at a neutral pH
value.

MULTIMEDIA FILTER             .           '

     The No. 1 multimedia filter (Neptune  Microfloc media) was operated
at an average flow of 1.8 liters/sec (29 gpm), which resulted in a filtra-
tion rate of   5.62 m/hr   (2.3 gpm /ft2).  The filters were backwashed
when the headless was approximately 3 meters, and the average run time
between backwashes was 74 hours.  The backwash water consumption averaged
1.03 percent of the filter's effluent flow.  The No. 1 filter performed
very well during this portion of the project.  Arithmetic means for the
water quality data are presented in Table 42.

     The TSS reduction of almost 85 percent resulted in low product water1
turbidity and an average TSS concentration in the filter effluent of 5
mg/1.- It should be noted that  filtration did not reduce the average
total phosphorus concentration, indicating that the phosphorus was soluble.
This problem resulted from the inadequate lime dose.

     Only very slight reductions in the .COD, soluble TOC, and BODs con-
centrations were observed.  The result was anticipated since virtually all
of the solids in the effluent from the recarbonation basin were inorganic.

     The specific conductance and the TDS concentration both increased
slightly.  The increase in total alkalinity suggests that solubilization
of carbonates to bicarbonates is the most likely explanation for the TDS
and specific conductance  increases.

     The geometric means for the observed microbiological parameters in-
creased  less than one log.  This increase indicated that some bacterial
growth was occurring within the filter, but no water quality changes of
consequence appeared to have resulted from the growth.

ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION

     The activated carbon adsorption column was operated at an average
flow of  101 liters/sec.  (18 gpm) during the last phase of the project
which resulted in a filtration  (surface loading) rate of   2.32 m/hr
(1.4 gpm/sq.ft.).  The average  run time between backwashes was 68 hours
and the washwater consumption was 0.95 percent of the product water.

     The empty-bed contact  time of 52 minutes produced  COD, TOC, and BOD5
removals that were excellent as the data presented  in Table 43 indicate.
Figure 48 presents probability distributions for TOC data, and the
difference  in median soluble TOC concentrations in  the activated  sludge

                                 135

-------
TABLE 42.
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE NO. 1
MULTIMEDIA FILTER, HIGH-pH   LIME
COAGULATION AND RECARBONATION STUDY

Parameter
COD
TOC, soluble
BOD5 ,
TSS
TDS
SC, ymho/cm
NH3 -N
Org. N
N02+N03 -N
N02 -N
Total P
pH, units
T. Alk. as CaCO
3
P, Alk. as CaC03
Std. Plate Count
per ml
Total Col i forms
per 100 ml
Fecal Coliforms
Recarb
Effluent
(mg/1)
27
9
5
33
598
919
2.36
2.21
9.5
0.118
1.0
7.0
221

12
2.3 x 103
•
2.3 x 102

1.7 x 102
Multimedia
Filter
Effluent
(mg/1)
25
7
4
5
645
974
2.78
2.15
10.4
0.131 ,
1.0
6.6
230

0
1.9 x 104

9.4 x 102

2.9 x 102
Reduction
(percent)
7,4
22.2
20.0
84.8
N/A
N/A
N/A .
2.7
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A

N/A
N/A

N/A

N/A
per 100 ml

N/A:  Not Applicable
                                136

-------
TABLE 43 .
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY FOR THE NO.  4 CARBON
COLUMN,HIGH-pH   LIME COAGULATION AND
RECARBONATION

Parameter

s
COD
TOC, soluble
BOD5
TSS
TDS
SC, jj mho/ cm
NH3 -N
Org. N
N02 +N03 -N
N02 -N
Total P
pH, units
T. Alk. as CaC03
P. Alk. as CaC03
. Std. Plate Count
per ml
i Total Coli forms
per 100 ml
Fecal Coli forms
per 100 ml
N/A: Not Applicable
'
Multimedia
Filter
Effluent
(mg/1)
25
7
4
5
645 -
974
2.78
2.15
10.4
0.131 .
1.0
6.6
230
0
1.9 x 104

9.4 x 102

2.9 x 102


'137
Carbon
Column
Effluent
(mg/1)
8
3
2
4
637
981
2.73
1.11
10.8
0.117
0.9
6.8
236
0
3.3 x 103

1.3 x 102

59


-
Reduction
(percent)


68.0
57.1
50.0
20:0
1.2
N/A
1.8
48,4
N/A
10.7
10.0
N/A
N/A
0
82.6

86.2

79.7




-------
  1000.0
   100.0
 cr>

 E
o
o
    10.0
     1.0
                                     Act. SI.  Inf.



                           	  Act. SI.  Eff.



                            — —  Carb. Col. Eff.
         2      5     10  15 20    30   40  50   60   70   80  85
95     98
                   PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED   -

         Figure 48.  Frequency  distributions  for TOC  data;  high-pH

                     lime  coagulation  and  recarbonation  study.
                                  138

-------
and activated carbon effluents is very evident.  The ability of the carbon
to remove color, and to a lesser extent organic nitrogen is shown in
Figures 49 and 50, respectively.

     Figure 51 shows probability distributions for total phosphorus
concentrations, and indicates the capability of the AWT processes for re-
moving phosphorus, although  improved pH control and lime feed would have
reduced the total phosphorus concentrations to even lower levels.

     The half-log reductions observed in bacterial densities are
probably not significant in terms of either process design or facility
operations.

METALS REMOVALS

     Summaries of the metals data for the high-pH  lime coagulation and
single-stage recarbonation phase of the research program are presented in
Tables 44 through 49 in order of their location in the treatment sequence.
For the purpose of studying metals removal the Densator and the recarbon-
ation basin have been treated as a single chemical treatment process.
Even though the metals data from the upflow clarifier are presented in
Table 46, they were not used in statistical comparisons with the other
two treatment sequences, instead the recarbonation basin effluent con-
centrations were used.

Aluminum

     The mean and median removals of aluminum were 32 percent and 54 per-
cent through the activated sludge unit, and 68 percent and 59 percent
through the chemical treatment processes.  The reductions in the latter
exhibited a very strong correlation with the metal concentration (r=0.995),'
the optimum pH ranged between 10.0 to 10.5.  Both multimedia filtration
and carbon adsorption failed to reduce the average concentrations; how-
ever, the carbon column did significantly reduce the extreme values.

Arsenic

     Very little removal of arsenic was observed across the biological
treatment process, but  high-pH lime clarification and recarbonation.
effected removals of 81 percent (mean) and 77 percent (median).  The
reductions exhibited a very strong concentration effect (r=0.99), but
other correlations were not discovered.

     Filtration further reduced the mean concentration by about 0.4 yg/1,
and little or no removal occurred in the carbon column.

     Mean and median train removals of arsenic were 84 percent and 79
percent, respectively.  The EPA drinking water MCL of 0.05 mg/1 was
exceeded by 9 percent of the train influent samples and none of the
train effluent samples.

     The probability distributions shown in Figure 52 vividly illustrate

                                  139

-------
    100.0
to
 O
o
•p
a.
Di
3
o
o
     10.0
      1.0
Recarb. Eff.

Carb. Col. Eff.
          2      5  .   10  15 20    30   40  50  60   70   80  85  90    95     98

                    PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED
          Figure 49.   Frequency distributions for selected color data;
                      high-pH  lime coagulation and recarbonation study.
                                     140

-------
100.0
r- 10.0
•\
D)
E
' «
z:
UJ
CD
O
a:
h-
i — i
•z.
i— i
2:
CD
O
1.0
0.1
















, 	


f •
•






















• 	

f .»*















MM* •
	



-


• ••••









/







^^B •
• flMMII






,«»•
...

'














- Ac
... DC
- Cc






-""
.=••'






/
/
















, '





t. SI. Eff.
carb. Eff.
irb. Col. Ef







.•'"





/
/







^^ 0

.••'



•










x-x




/














f.






*'

























s

• • ' **
•




,

















s


•••






















^



§ *











(







j»





t , •
>-



















^•****





.»•*
***"*










10   15 20   30   40  50  60  .70   80  85  90   '95
                                                                     93
                  PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED

Figure 50.  Frequency distributions  for  selected  organic nitrogen data;
            high-pH lime coagulation and recarbonation study.
                                  141

-------
   100.0
     10.0
 D)
 E
 D.
= <
 o
        1.0
        0.
                            -  Act. SI.  Inf.
                            -  Act. SI.  Eff.
                            ••  Carb.  Col.  Eff.
          2     5     10  15  20    30   40   50  60   70   30 85  90    95
                     PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED
     Figure 51.  Frequency  distributions  for selected total  P data;
                 high-pH  lime  coagulation and recarbonation study.
                                    142

-------
TABLE 44.     ACTIVATED SLUDGE INFLUENT METALS SUMMARY
              HIGH-pH  LIME TREATMENT WITH RECARBONATION
              NOVEMBER 1973 - JANUARY 1974



Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca .
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.64
13.5
0.35
0.110
64.5
11.5
0.051
0.090
0.121
0.80
0.26
5.25
0.079
96.5
0.126
0.080
3.8
9.4
0.88
3.1
0.180
'GEO.
MEAN
0.64
15.0
0.35
0.105
64.2
12.6
0.050
0.09'4
0.137
0.79
0.25
5.00
0.077
90.9
0.119
.0.082
. 4.3
9.4
0.71
3.1
0.184
ARITH.
MEAN
0.69
21.2
0.36
0.115
66.2
13.7
0.052
0.114
0.182
0.85
0.28
5.14
0.079
93.8
0.136
0.089
7.8
9.7
0.79
3.4
0.203
cr

0.28
22.9
0.097
0.042
18.1
7.9
0.014
0.090
0.156
0.32
0.16
1.05
0.016
21.7
0.068
0.035
8.4
2.4
0.32
1.3
0.098
MAX.

1.60
119.0
0.65
0.25
144.0
38.0
0.081
0.620
0.820
1.63
0.75
7.33
- 0.110
127.0
0.310
0.20
33.0
17.0
1.25
8.5
0.60
MIN.
i
0.25
2.3
0.16
0.01
32.0
2.0
0.028
0.015
0.021
0.37
O.O-
.I .62
0,043
33.0
0.015
0.02
0.0
3.9
0.23
0.5
0.08
N

41
45
42
45
44
46
44
46
44
44
38
43
44
44
44
45
26
41
41
32
44
                     Concentration in mg/1  (*yg/l)
                                  143

-------
TABLE 45-     ACTIVATED SLUDGE EFFLUENT METALS
              SUMMARY HIGH-pH  LIME TREATMENT WITH
              RECARBONATION NOVEMEBER 1973 - JANUARY
    1974
          MEDIAN     GEO.     ARITH.    Cf
                     MEAN     MEAN
MAX,
MIN.
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co '
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
0.30
13.4
0.35
0.070
65.0
6.0
0.048
0.044
0.055
0.50
0.17
5.05
0.060
94.0
0.103
0.04
2.2
9.4
0.83
2.8
0.090
0.33
15.6
0.36
0.067
63.1
6.0
0.046
0.041
0.065
0.73
0.19 .
4.91
0.053
88'. 0
0.101
0.043
2.2
9.0
0.63-
2.7
0.110
0.47
20.6
0.36
0.075
64.9
7.3
0.048
0.052
0.077
1.45
0.26
4.96
0.066
90.3
0.106
0.050
2.4
9.3
0.72
2.9
0.133
0.61
18.0
0.074
0.034
16.2
4.1
0.013
0.044 *
0.052
2.68
0.25
0.64
0.046
19.6
0.036
0.034
2.2
2.2
0.30
1.1
0.097
3.5
85.0
0.56
0.24
118.0
23.0
0.073
0.270
0.290
14.90
1.075
5.94
0.250
127.0
0.20
0.17
8.8
13.5
1.19
8.0
0.48
0.02
2.4
0.25
0.005
39.0
1.0
0.020
0.002
0.012
0.10
0.05
3.21
0.003
45.0
0.044
0.01
0.0
4,6
0.16,
1.3
0.05
42
47
43
46
45
47
45
47
45
45
39
44
45
45
45
46
28
42
42
34
45
                     Concentration in mg/1  .(* yg/1)
                                  144

-------
TABLE 45.    UP-FLOW CLARIFIER EFFLUENT  METALS  SUMMARY
             HIGH-pH  LIME TREATMENT WITH  RECARBONATION
             NOVEMBER 1973 -  JANUARY 1974
          MEDIAN
MAX,
MIN.
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
0.15
3.9
0.37
0.085
103.0
4.0
0.064
0.009
0.047
0.56
0.10
2.71
0.015
94.0
0.084
0.030
0.5
7.9
0.68
3.3
0.040
0.16
3.3
0.37
0.078
101.2
3.0
0.063
0.011
0.0045
0.54
0.11
2.20
0.015
88.4
0.079
0.028
1.4
8.2
0.59
3.2
0.052
0.18
5.6
0.38
0.086
105.4
3.6
0.067
0.014
0.050
0.97
0.11
2.58
0.019
90.5
0.087
0.029
1.4
8.7
0.66
3.4
0.084
0.12
7.4
0.09
0.032
29.6
1.3
0.023
0.018
0.026
• 2.42
0.10
1.28
0.016
18.9
0.039
0.010
2.0
3.2
0.26
1.0
0.110
0.55
46.5
0.64
0.140
172.0
6.0
0.116
0.120
0.140
16.3
0.40
5.56
0.102
121.0
0.200
0.06
7.3
20.0
1.11
6.2
0.58
0.02
0.0
0.22
0.010
49.0
1.0
0.019
0.003
0.019
0.09
0.0
0.56
0.002
49.0
0.030
0.01
0.0
3.7
0.15
1.6
0.01
40
44
42
44
43
45
43
45
43
43
39
42
43
•43
43
44
28
40
40
34
43
                     Concentration  in  mg/1  (*yg/l)
                                 145

-------
TABLE 47.    RECARBONATION BASIN EFFLUENT METALS
             SUMMARY HIGH-pH  LIME TREATMENT WITH
             RECARBONATION NOVEMBER 1973 - JANUARY
             1974



Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
MEDIAN

0.12
3.1
0.35
0.090
98.0 .
3.0
0.065
0.008
0.050
0.51
0.08
2.50
0.014
94.0
0.082
0.030
1.0
7.9
0.66
3.2
0.430
GEO.
MEAN
0.13
3.2
0.34
0.080
100.6
3.1
0.063
0.009
0.053
0.46
0.15
2.10
0.014
87.1
0.076
0.026
0.1
7.8
0.572
3.1
0.355
ARITH.
MEAN
0.15
3.9
0.34
0.084
106.1
3.4
0.067
0.011
0.073
0.82
0.17
2.40
0.016
90.0
0.083
0.027
1.5
8.1
0.64
3.2
0.654
0
•
0.09
3.0
0.07
0.032
34.1
1.4
0.023
0.009
0.069
1.77
0.27
1.10
0.011
20.9
0.032
0.007
1.8
2.3
0,27
0.6
0.864
MAX. •

0.43
15.3
0.49
0.15
180.0
7.0
0.115
0.050
0.33
11.50
1.48
4.71
0.073
120.0
0.160
0.04
. 5.8
12.2
1.16
4.8
4,10
MIN.

0.03
0.0
0.20
0.0
39.0
1.0
0.022
0.004
0.013
0.04 .
' 0.0
0.53
0.004
34.0
0.030
0.01
0.0
3.4
0.15
1.5
0.02
N

38
40
38
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
36
41
41
41
41
40
26
38
39
32
41
                     Concentration in mg/1 (*yg/l)
                                   146

-------
TABLE '48.   FILTER EFFLUENT METALS SUMMARY  HIGH-pH
            LIME TREATMENT WITH RECARBONATION
            NOVEMBER 1973 - JANUARY 1974

MEDIAN
GEO.
MEAN
ARITH. CT
MEAN
MAX. MIN. N
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
0.15
3.0
0.35
0.090
85.0
3.0
0.059
0.007
0.059
0.21
0.08
2.66
0.15
80.0
0.068
0.030
1.3
7.8
0.64
3.5
0.390
0.16
2.3
0:35
0.090
91.4
3.0
0.057
0.007
0.063
0.21
0.11
2.27
0.015
78.9
0.065
0.025
1.7
7.2
0.59
3.5
0.375
0.21
3.5
0.36
0.094
96.5
3.3
0.062
0.008
0.082
0.24
0.12
2.61
0.017
82.5
0.072
0.026
1.7
7.6
0.66
3.6
0.532
0.19
3.5
0.08
0.028
33.4
1.4
0.022
0.004
0.092
0.17
0.16
1.25
0.010
23.3
0.029
0.006
2.5
2.4
0.26
0.8
0.503
1.01
19.3
0.57
0.15
171.0
6.0
0.108
0.027
0.560
1.00
0.63
5.38
0.047
118.0
0.150
0.03
11 .0
11.1
1.12
4.9
2.60
0.02
0.0
0.19
0.03
54.0
0.0
0.016
0.003
0.026
0.07
0.0
0.55
0.002
36.0
0.010
0.01
0.0
2.3
0.11
1.2
0.04
33
33
31
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
32
33
33
33
33
33
20
33
33
27
33
                    Concentration in mg/1 (*yg/l)
                                  147

-------
TABLE 49.   CARBON COLUMN EFFLUENT METALS SUMMARY
             HIGH-pH  LIME TREATMENT WITH RECARBONATION
            NOVEMEBER 1973 - JANUARY 1974

MEDIAN
GEO.
MEAN
ARITH.
MEAN
(T
MAX. MIN. N
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni '
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
0.16
2.8
0.25
0.080
94.0
3.0
0.059
0.005
0.040
0.20
0.03
2.37
0.016
79.0
0.072
0.030
0.0
7.8
0.65
2.2
0.450
0.14
2.3
0.26
0.078
94.9
3.0
0.058
0.005
0.044
0.18
0.10
2.19
0.014
79.0
0.068
0.020
1.2
7.1
0.59
2.0
0.426
0.16
3.5
0.32
0.086
101.2
3.0
0.063
0.006
0.054
0.20
0.08
2.46
0.017
81.7
0.078
0.027
0.7
7.3
0.64
2.0
0.617
0.08
3.2
0.22
0.031
38.4
1.4
0.022
0.003
0.037
0.07
0.13
1.13
0.009
20.1 .
0.046
0.008
1.0
1.9
. 0.24
1.0
0.541
, 0.31
17.7
1.06
0.16
207.0
8.0
0.109
0.011
0.150
0.42
0.60
5.26
0.045
113.0
0.260
0.05
3.0
11.0
1.15
4.0
2.20
0.03 '*
0.0
0.08
o.oi.
55.0
0.0
0.020
0.001
0.014
0.08
0.0
0.53
0.002
44.0
0.026
0.02
0.0
3.9
0.09
0.0 •
0.03
33
33
31
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
32
33
33
33
33
33
21
33
33
27
33
                     Concentration in mg/1 (*ug/l)
                                  148

-------
                                   c
                                   (0

                                   c
                                   o
                                   •r"
                                   •P
                                   (0
                                 a
                                   cn
                                 ^ QJ
                                 UJ £
                                 o .=
                                 X
                                   u
                                 UJ

                                 ^  S- W

                                 iSi
                                 °- "O -r-
                                    u c
                                    c o

                                    rs s-
                                    O" fO
                                    0) O
                                    S- 0)
                                   LL.. S-
                                   CM
                                    s-
                                    3
                                    D)
149

-------
that the only process that was effective  in removing arsenic was chemical
treatment  (high-pH  coagulation and recarbonation); biological treatment,
filtration, and carbon adsorption were virtually ineffective in reducing
arsenic concentrations.

Boron

     Boron was a refractory element in the treatment sequence.  Only in
the carbon column was there significant removal, 11 percent (mean) to 29
percent (median).  The reductions through.the carbon'were proportional to
the influent concentrations (r=0.32), and inversely proportional to X/M
(r=0.24).  In the latter case, the initial removals were in the range of
70-80 percent on virgin carbon, decreasing to 0-15 percent at X/M's of
0.06 and greater.  The frequency distributions of boron in all of the ef-
fluents  sampled,were log-normal and near-identical, except for the
carbon column effluent which had a bimodal distribution.

Barium

     Barium was significantly removed in  only the activated sludge process;
the reductions were 35 percent (mean) and 36 percent (median).  A mean
increase of about 0.010 mg/1 occurred during chemical treatment and the
probable cause was contamination in the commercial  lime.  Little change
in barium concentrations occurred through multimedia and carbon filtra-
tion, although' in its virgin state, the carbon reduced the concentration
of barium by 40-60 percent, declining to  zero as the X/M approached about
0.10.  None of the samples ever reached or exceeded the EPA drinking
water MCL of 1.0 mg/1.

     Frequency distributions for barium concentrations in the activated
sludge influent and the product water are shown in Figure 53.

Calcium

     The activated sludge process reduced the mean calcium concentration
about 2 percent but a mean increase of'40.5 mg/1 occurred in the Densator.
There was no removal during the single-stage recarbonation process, as
much of the calcium was converted directly to the soluble bicarbonate
form.

     Filtration  removed about 9.6  mg/1  of calcium,  which  resulted  in
a 9-percent    reduction in the mean concentration.  There was also some
degree of correlation between effluent calcium and TSS.  The mean and
median increases in calcium through the train were 35 mg/1 and 30 mg/1,
respectively, the maximum observed train effluent concentration was 207
mg/1.

Cadmium

     Cadmium was removed both by biological  treatment, 47 percent by
means and 48 percent by medians;  and by chemical treatment, 53 percent
(means) and 50 percent (medians).   The reductions observed through  the

                                  150

-------
                                                   Q
                                                   LU
                                                   LU
                                                   O
                                                   X
                                                  O
                                                  LU
                                                  Cf
                                                  LU

                                                  CD
                                                  CQ
                                                  CQ
                                                  <
                                                  DO
                                                  O
                                                        •a
                                                        c
                                                        (0

                                                        c
                                                        O
 O1
 (0
 O
 O

 0)
 E
a:
 a.
  i
£L
 D)
•i—
.e
 E
 Z5
 i-
 o
M-

 00
 c
 o
•r—  •
•P >,
 3 -O
J2 3
•r- -P
 S- 00

 00 C
•r- O
TD T-
   •P
 >> (0
 O C
 E O
 QJ .Q

 CT fO
 CU O
 i- OJ
U. i-
                                                       00
                                                       LT)

                                                        0)
                                                        S-

                                                        D1
                                                       •p-
                                                       U.
151

-------
 Densator and recarbonation  basin  exhibited  a  strong  concentration effect   ,
 (r=0.94).   Negligible cadmium removals  were observed through multimedia
 filtration  and carbon adsorption.   Fifty-six percent of  the train  in-
 fluent samples  contained cadmium  in  excess  of theNIPDWR MCL of 0.01 mg/1;
 however, none of the product water  samples  exceeded  the MCL.

      The frequency distributions  for cadmium  concentrations in  Figure 54
 show rather clearly how effectively  the biological and chemical  processes
 removed cadmium.

 Cobalt

      The frequency distributions  shown  in Figure  55  indicate that cobalt
 was  not removed in the high-pH   lime with recarbonation train,  due  to its
 refractory nature and the fact that  both the  lime and ferric chloride
 coagulants contained trace  quantities of the  element.  Chemical  analysis
 revealed a cobalt content of 20 mg/1 in the lime  slurry and 19  mg/1  in the
 ferric chloride solution.   Based  on  applied chemical  doses, it  appears
 that more cobalt was derived from the lime  feed than the  ferric chloride;
 however, the calculated cobalt increase based on  these analyses was  only
 about 40 percent of the observed  mean increase.   There was not,  as  ex-
 pected, a reasonably good correlation between the increase in cobalt and
 the  chemical  dose.   Also, there was  more than  three  times as much varia-
 tion  in  the  cobalt  increases  as in the  chemical feed rates.  The mean and
 median  increases  in  cobalt through the  treatment  train were only 0.011.
 mg/1  and 0.008 mg/1,  respectively.

 Chromium

      Chromium was removed progressively to  a  lesser  degree by each  process
 in the treatment sequence.   Mean  and median removals were 54 percent and
 51 percent by activated sludge,  79 percent  and 82 percent by chemical
 treatment.  Reductions through the Densator exhibited a very strong
 correlation with concentration (r=0.98), but  there was not enough varia-
 tion in the operating and process control parameters to evaluate their
 influence on chromium removed.

      Further removals of 25  percent  (means) and 13 percent (medians) were
 observed through multimedia  filtration, and the reductions exhibited a
 concentration correlation (r=0.78).   There  was a  linear relationship
 between filter  effluent turbidity and chromium concentration (r=0.23).
 Carbon adsorption removed 33 percent (mean) and 29 percent (median), and
 very effectively damped extreme values. The  reductions through  the
 carbon column exhibited a strong  correlation  with concentration (r=0.83),
 and  chromium removal appeared to  decrease substantially when the effluent
 COD's exceeded  about 15 mg/1.  Ninety-one percent of the  train  influent
 samples contained chromium  in excess of the EPA drinking  water  MCL  of ,
 0.05 mg/1, while none of the train effluent samples  even  approached  this
 high a concentration.

      Frequency  distributions for  chromium concentrations  are shown  in
figure 56.
                                                *

                                  152

-------
                                                                                                         E
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                        •r—
                                                                                                        •P
                                                                                                         (0

                                                                                                         3
                                                                                                        ^O)

                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                         o

                                                                                                     S  v
                                                                                                     Q  E
                                                                                                     LU lp-
                                                                                                     LU "—


                                                                                                     *£
                                                                                                     LU  Q.
                                                                                                    Q
                                                                                                    LU
                                                                                                    UJ
                                                                                                    CO

                                                                                                    U.
                                                                                                    O'
PROBAB
                                                                                                         D)
§1
CD
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                         S-
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                         O 3
                                                                                                        •r- -P
                                                                                                        •P CO
                                                                                                         3
                                                                                                        -Q C
                                                                                                        •r- O
                                                                                                         i--i-
                                                                                                        •P -P
                                                                                                         CO fO
                                                                                                        •r- E .
                                                                                                        •o o
                                                                                                            JO
                                                                                                         >>s-
                                                                                                        -U fO
                                                                                                         E O
                                                                                                         0) 0)
                                                                                                         3 S-
                                                                                                         CT
                                                                                                         0) t3
                                                                                                         S- C
                                                                                                        11   (0
                                                                                                        LO


                                                                                                         0)
                                                                                                         i.
                                                                                                         3
                                                                                                         O)
O
o
                                                     153

-------
                                                                                         Q
                                                                                         UJ
                                                                                         Q
                                                                                         LU
                                                                                         LU
                                                                                         O
                                                                                         X
                                                                                         UJ
                                                                                         Q
                                                                                         UJ
                                                                                         <
CO

U.
O

>-
                                                                                         CQ
                                                                                         <
                                                                                         CD
                                                                                         O
                                                                                         on
                                                                                         Q.
                                                                                               C
                                                                                               O
                                                                                               •r—
                                                                                               •P
                                                                                               tC
                                                                                               O)
                                                                                               (0
                                                                                               o
                                                                                               U

                                                                                               (1)
                                                                                               E
               .0.
               'I
               ^:
               D1
               (0
               J3
               O
               U

               s-
               o
               M-

               oo
               C
               O
               •r-
               •P
               Z!
                                                                                               S-
                                                                                               •P
                                                                                                  CO

                                                                                                  C
                                                                                                  O
                                                                                                  (0
                                                                                                  C
                                                                                                  O
               u  ro
               c  o
               OJ  OJ
               D  S-
               CT
               
-------
1.000
        \
 0.100
 en
 E
h-
UJ
o
•ZL
O
o
  0.010
 0.001
                                          Act.  SI.  Inf.
                                          Act.  SI.  Eff.
                                          Recarb.  Eff.
                                          Carb.  Col.  Eff.
                                        • t.
                                                          \
                                                    *
                                                               \
                                                                    \
                                                                  *
2     5    10  15  20   30   40   50  60   70
                                                      85  90    95     93
                  PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR  EXCEEDED
         Figure 56.  Frequency distributions for  chromium,  high-pH
                     lime coagulation and  recarbonation  study.
                                   155

-------
Copper

     Copper was removed during biological treatment and high-pH  lime
clarification, with mean and median removals of 58 percent and 54 percent
in the former, and 35 percent and 15 percent in the Tatter.  The removal
of copper in the Densator exhibited a weak concentration correlation
(r=0.58).  However, there were sustained increases in the mean concen-
tration through the recarbonation basin and multimedia filter of 0.023 mg/1
and 0.009 mg/1 respectively.  The source of the increase through recarbona-
tion was attributed to  brass valves and miscellaneous fittings in the basin
and on the influent line.

     Copper removals by the activated carbon amounted to 34 percent (mean)
to 32 percent (median).  Reductions in concentration through the column
exhibited a strong concentration correlation (r=0.93), but failed to
correlate with NHgN.    Overall, there was-a net removal of 71 percent
(mean) and 67 percent (median) through the treatment sequence.  In spite
of the increases in the recarbonation basin and filter, the maximum
observed concentration of 0.82 mg/1 was found on the train influent;
therefore, all samples were consistently well below the Secondary
Regulation recommendation of 1.0 mg/1.

Iron

     Analysis of iron was complicated by the occurrence of extreme values
at all sample sites except the train influent and train effluent.  Ferric
chloride was metered into the aeration basin from January 4-31, 1974 in
order to promote better settling in the secondary clarifier, where un-
controlled denitrification was causing a serious rising sludge problem.
On 40 percent of the paired samples there was an increase in iron through
the activated sludge unit, resulting in a mean negative removal (or
addition) of 71 percent.  At the same time,  the median concentration
decreased 37 percent.  On three occasions the FeCl3 feed rate was far in
excess of the required dose, which provided an opportunity to study the
removal of slug doses of iron through the remainder of train.

     When ferric chloride was fed to the Densator as a flocculation aid,
there was a mean average removal of 43 percent through high-pH  coagula-
tion and recarbonation.  The reductions exhibiting a strong concentra-
tion correlation (r=0.85).

     Multimedia filtration removed an additional 71 percent (mean) or
59 percent (median), and the reductions exhibited a very strong
concentration correlation (r=0.997).  The filter effluent TSS  concentra-
tion was also a fair estimator of the iron concentration (r-0.40).  Carbon
filtration removed a final 18 percent (mean) or 5 percent (median),
eliminating all extreme values.   The reductions through carbon exhibited
a reasonably strong concentration effect (r=0.90).

     Through the entire treatment train there was a mean iron removal  of
77 percent,.and a median removal of 75 percent.  All of the train influent
samples exceeded 0.3 mg/1, the Secondary Regulation recommendation,

                                   156    .

-------
 compared  to  6  percent  of  the  train effluent  samples.   Both  the  train
 influent  and effluent  probability distributions  had  similar log-normal
 patterns,  and  were  devoid of  extreme  values.

 Mercury

     Mean  and  median removals  of mercury were 6  percent and  35 percent
 through biological  treatment,  35 percent and 53  percent through chemical
 treatment.   The  reductions  in  the latter case exhibited a very weak1
 correlation  with concentration  (r=0.31), and the Densator  effluent
 mercury concentration  was proportional to the total  P  concentration
 (r=0.44).

     There was little  change  in the observed mercury concentrations as a
 result of multimedia filtration, but  a median removal  of 63 percent was
 observed through activated  carbon.  Reductions in mercury through the
 carbon column  correlated  with  concentration  (r=0.53);  also,  a linear
 correlation  between effluent mercury  and COD (r=0.53)  was noted.  The
 train removals for mercury  were 71 percent (mean) and  89 percent (median).
All samples  were well  below the EPA drinking water MCLof 0.002 mg/1.
57.
     Frequency distributions are shown for mercury concentrations in Figure
Magnesium

     Only an average of 0.2 mg/1 of magnesium was removed during biological
treatment compared to approximately 2.6 mg/1 removed during chemical
treatment.  The chemical treatment processes produced magnesium removals
of 52 percent (mean) or 50 percent (median).  Because the average pH
established in the Densator was less than that required for complete
magnesium removal, approximately 2.5 mg/1 remained in the effluent.
There were, however, a few days when the pH was sufficiently high to effect
removals up to 9.0 percent, which provided an opportunity to study the pH-
alkalinity relationships on magnesium removal.  The effluent magnesium
concentration was inversely proportional to methyl orange alkalinity
(r=0.65), phenolphthalein alkalinity (r=0.66), pH (r= 0.40), and directly
proportional to turbidity (r=0.86) and total P (r=0.34).

    Multimedia filtration failed to remove magnesium.  There was, in fact,
a slight increase in magnesium Across the filter, due probably to floe
breakup.  The effluent magnesium concentration was directly proportional
to TSS (r=0.31) and turbidity (r=0.53).  Carbon adsorption reduced
magnesium concentrations  6 percent (mean) to 11  percent (median); the
reductions exhibited a concentration correlation  (r=0.53).  The distribu-
tion of concentrations in all process streams was clearly bimodal.

Manganese

     Biological  removal  of manganese averaged only 17 percent (mean) or
24 percent (median),  contrasted with mean and median removals of  76
percent and 77 percent through the chemical  treatment processes.  The
                                  157

-------
                           LU
                            •P
                            fO
                              )
                             (0

                             8
                             u
                           0
                           X
                           Di

                           °
                             O5
                          o-
                          CD
                          z
                             u
                             t.
                             o
                          0 C/5 >>
                          .   C T3
                          >: o 3


                          3S"


                          iff
                          CO i +J
                          C^ <* .Trf

                          Q- -o o
                              .Q

                             (J (0
                             C U
                             (1J 

                             0) "D
                             S- E
                             11  fO
                             QJ

                             S-

                             3

                             O5
158

-------
 reductions  through  the  Densator exhibited a strong concentration correla-
 tion  (r=0.97);  the  reductions declined  slightly with  increasing effluent
JSS and  total  P.  Little or no removal  occurred through multimedia fil-
 tration  or  carbon adsorption.  The Secondary Regulations  recommended
 drinking water  limit of 0.05 mg/1 was exceeded in 95  percent of the train
 influent samples, and none of the train effluent samples.

 Sodium

      Sodium was refractory with the exception of a slight, and unexplained,
 removal  of  8 percent (mean) to 15 percent (median) during multimedia
 filtration.  There  was  no significant contamination of the treatment
 train arising from  the  addition of chemicals.  Upon analysis, the ferric
 chloride slurry contained about 310 mg/1 Na, which would  represent a
 calculated  increase of  only 0.006 mg/1  in the Densator.   Since the
 observed increase was higher, the lime may have also  contained trace
 amounts  of  sodium,  but  not enough to impart more than about 0.2 mg/1
 (the  observed  increase) into the, water.  Overall removals were 13 percent
 (means)  and 18  percent  (medians), the maximum train effluent concentration
 being 113 mg/1.

 Nickel
     Mean and median removals of nickel during biological treatment aver-
 aged 22 percent and 18 percent, respectively.  Removals through chemical
 treatment averaged 22 percent (mean) or 20 percent  (median), and decreased
 slightly with increasing effluent TSS and total P.  The reductions ex-
 hibited a slight  linear concentration effect  (r=0.52).  No correlations
 in nickel removal were observed as a result of the multimedia filtration,
 where  the mean and median  removals averaged 13 percent and 17 percent,
 respectively.  Nickel was  not removed by carbon.  Both the mean and median
 train  removals averaged 43 percent.

     Probability  distributions for nickel concentrations are given in
 Figure 58.

 Lead
     Those data used to develop  the probability distributions shown in
Figure 59 indicate that most of the lead was removed during biological
treatment,'the mean and median removal efficiencies were 22 percent and 18
percent, respectively.  Removals through chemical treatment averaged 45
percent  (mean) and 25 percent  (median), the only good correlation being a
concentration effect on lead reductions (r=0.98).  There was essentially
no change in the  lead concentration as a result of filtration and carbon
adsorption.  The  train effluent mean and median concentrations were both
approximately 0.03 mg/1.  Although the train removals were not great,
approximately 82  percent of the train influent samples violated the EPA
drinking water MCL of 0.05 mg/1, while  none of the train effluent samples
exceeded the limit.

Selenium
                                   159

-------
                                                        c
                                                        o
                                                       •r-
                                                       -P
                                                        (0

                                                        ZJ.
                                                        D5
                                                        rtJ

                                                    OS
                                                    UJ
                                                    Q  (L)
                                                    LU  £
                                                    LU £
                                                    O i—
                                                    X
                                                    LU X
                                                   O
<
=>
•o-.
LU
                                                        0)
                                                   i-i  S-
                                                   LU  o
                                                   CO  q_

                                                   U-  (/>  >>
                                                   O  C "O
                                                       O  3
                                                   >-  -I- -P
                                                   h-  -P  CO
                                                   CO

                                                   CQ
                                                   O
                                                   a:
                                                   CL
    jQ  C
    •r-  O
    S- T-
    •P -P
    00  (0
    •r-  E
    •a  o
                                                       O fO
                                                       c u
                                                       C1J 0)
                                                       3 S-
                                                       cr
                                                       ID T3
                                                       S- C
                                                       U. fO
                                                       00
                                                       in

                                                       0)
                                                       CD
160

-------
o
O
O

o
o
o
                                                                                                      Q
                                                                                                      UJ
                                                                                                      LL)
                                                                                                      O
                                                                                                      X
                                                                                                      UJ
          o
          Q
                                                                                                     cr
                                                                                                     LU

                                                                                                     a
                                                                                                     UJ
                                                                                                     CO
                                                                                                           (0
                                                                                                           c
                                                                                                           o
                13
                01
                (C
                O
                o

                OJ
                E
                •I—
                                                                                                           Q.
                                                                                                            I
                                                                                                           .c -
                                                                                                           D)
                QJ


                i-
                O
o
>-
1—
1 — 1
1
__!
I — 1
CO
CQ
0
Qi
Q.

t







(f>
C.
0
'£ >>
3T3
•r- -P
S- V)
•P
W C
•i- O
T5 -r-
-P
U C
C O
OJ -Q
3 $-
O" fO
0) U
i- CD
Uu S-
LO

 OJ
 S-
 D
 D)
•r~
U_
                                                     161

-------
     As shown  in Figure 60, selenium was removed in the biological,
chemical, and  physical  (carbon) treatment processes.  Mean and median
removals were  69 percent and 42 percent by activated sludge, 40 percent
and 57 percent by high-pH  lime clarification, and 58 percent and 100
percent by carbon adsorption.  Reductions in the Densator and carbon
column exhibited concentration correlations  (r=0.45 and 0.98, respectively)
but no other correlations.  There was no removal of selenium in the
multimedia filter.  The EPA drinking water standard of 0.01 mg/1 was
exceeded in 35 percent of the train influent samples, while all train
effluent samples were well below the limit.

Silicon

     Silicon removal varied between 4 percent and 6 percent through each
unit process in the treatment train.  The Densator and recarbonation
basin together removed 13 percent (mean) or  16 percent (median), the
effluent concentration was proportional to TSS (r=0.41) and total P
(r=0.55).  Also, the reductions in concentration were directly proportional
to the methyl  orange and phenolphthalein alkalinities (r=0.33 and 0.41,
respectively).  Multimedia filtration reduced the mean concentration by
only 6 percent, and the filter effluent silicon concentration was propor-
tional to effluent TSS (r=0.32) and turbidity (r=0.40).  Little or no
removal occurred through carbon adsorption.

Strontium
     Mean and median removals of strontium were 9 percent and 6 percent
in the activated sludge unit, 11 percent and 20 percent in the Densator/
recarbonation system.  The reductions through chemical treatment exhibited
a concentration effect (r=0.42), and the recarbonation basin effluent
strontium concentration was proportional to TSS (r=0.38).  There was
little, if any, significant change in concentration following multimedia
and carbon filtration.

     The treatment sequence influent and effluent frequency distributions
shown in Figure 61 indicate almost no removal, indicating that strontium
is a quite refractory material.

Vanadium
     Vanadium was removed only by biological treatment and carbon filtra-
tion, with mean and median removals of 15 percent and 8 percent in the
former, and 43 percent and 37 percent in the latter.  There was a mean
increase of 0.5 mg/1 in the Densator, perhaps originating from contamina-
tion in the ferric chloride slurry.  The carbon column more than removed
this added amount, the reductions exhibiting a concentration effect
(r=0.54).  Mean and median train removals of vanadium were 39 percent
and 28 percent, respectively.
     Zinc was efficiently removed by the activated sludge unit and the

                        ;          162

-------
 100.0
   10.0
0)
3.
o
I-H

<

I-
2:
UJ
o
o
     1.0
    0.1
         2  •   5
10  15 20   '30  40   50  60   70   80, 85  90    95
                    PROBABILITY OF BEING EQUALLED OR EXCEEDED
       Figure  60.Frequency distributions  for selenium, high-pH  lime
                    coagulation and recarbonation study.
                                    163

-------
                     q_
                      C
                     •P
                      U
                           o
                           o
s-
(0
o
                                                    7
Q
UJ
Q
UJ
Ld
O
X
LU

C£
O

Q
UJ
                                                                                            cr
                                                                                            UJ
                                                                                            CJ3   q_.
                                                                                            LU
                                                                                            03

                                                                                            U.
                                                                                            o
                                                                                            CQ
                                                                                            O
                                                                       0)
                                                                       e
 Q.
 I
JC
 cn
                                                                       3  •
                                                                      •r~ >,
                                                                      •P -0
                                                                       C 3
                                                                       O -P
                                                                       S- CO
                                                                      •P
                                                                       VI C
                                                                         o
                                                                       S--r-
                                                                       O -P
                                                                         (0
                                                                         c
                                                                       10 O
                                                                       C J2
                                                                       O S-
                                                                      •r- fO
                                                                      •P O
                                                                       3 (!)
                                                                      J2 5-
                                                                                                 t..-O
                                                                                                 •P C
                                                                                                 CO fO
                                                                                            CQ   TJ
                                                                                                 O -P
                                                                                                 C (0
                                                                                                 
-------
Densator.  Mean and median removals averaged 34 percent to 50 percent,
and 36 percent to 56 percent, respectively.  However, the galvanized
finish on the recarbonation basin was vigorously attacked, resulting in a
large increase in zinc during recarbonation.  The average mean and median
increases came to 0.57 mg/1 (675 percent) and 0.39 mg/1 (975 percent),
respectively, which more than negated the prior removals.  Subsequently,
there were only minor removals through filtration and carbon adsorption,
such that the mean concentration of zinc increased by .0.41 mg/1 (205
percent) through the treatment train.  Fortunately, not a single sample
violated the Secondary Regulations recommendation of 5.0 mg/1, in spite
of zinc's erratic behavior in the treatment train.  It should be noted
that soon after termination of the grant, the amount of zinc emanating
from the recarbonation basin started to decline, finally reaching the
point where no additions were occurring.  At this point all of the gal-
vanizing had been removed by corrosion and the bare steel tank rusted
quickly.
                                 165

-------
                                 SECTION 9
                     RESPONSES OF INDIVIDUAL METALS
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

     The period of investigation for metals ran from June 1,  1972 through
January 31, 1974, a total of 610 days.  The treatment processes of most
concern were the Densator, filter, and carbon column, operated in series.
Each of three basic types of chemical treatment were studied:   Lime, only,
alum, and lime with recarbonation.  It was determined by the  pilot plant
research staff that the only requirement as to the type of wastewater to be
treated was that the feed to the Densator be a well-nitrified wastewater.

     The requirement for nitrification resulted from the planning of the
virus removal studies (discussed in a subsequent section of this report), in
which low ammonia nitrogen concentrations were considered essential to,
proper disinfection with chlorine.

     Since adequate nitrification did not occur in the White  Rock Plant, it
became necessary to operate the Demonstration Plant's No. 1 activated sludge
unit in a nitryfying mode as pre-treatment to the physical/chemical process-
ing.  Although the activated sludge unit is considered a basic part of the
treatment train, its function with respect to grant requirements was
strictly pre-treatment.

     Due to the limited size and capacity of the aeration equipment it was
not possible to maintain nitrification for protracted periods on primary
effluent feed.  The wastewater sources at the White Rock Plant which were
utilized during the investigation included primary effluent,  stage 1
trickling filter effluent, stage II trickling filter effluent, and final
effluent.  Table 50 identifies the periods of operation on each source (s).
From August 2-8, 1972, the No. 1 aeration basin was drained for modifica-
tions to the aeration equipment and installation of an additional air
compressor, during this time the No. 2 aeration basin was substituted for
the No. 1 unit.  (Unless specifically referred to as No. 1 or No. 2, the
activated sludge data in this report include this week-long period in
August.)

     Two other periods of particular interest are August 16-17 and August
30 through November 26, 1972, in which the activated sludge influent was a
combination of primary effluent and unsettled stage II effluent.  Although
the exact volumetric ratio of each will never be known, estimates at the
time indicated about a 50/50 mixture.  In the light of -the grant require-
ments, and since the activated sludge influent stream was always sampled,

                                    166

-------
TABLE 50.    ACTIVATED SLUDGE INFLUENT, JUNE 1972 THROUGH JANUARY 1974
     DATES
FROM       THRU
6-1-72
8-2-72
 6-22-73
,6-23-73
 9-1-73
10-11-73
10-21-73
11-20-73
'8-1-72
8-8-72
8-9-72     8-15-72

8-16-72    8-17-72

8-18-72    8-29-72
8-30-72    11-26-72

11-27-72    6-8-73
 6-9-73     6-20-73
 6-21-73   -
 8-31-73
10-10-73
10-20-73
11-19-73
 1-31-74
                SOURCE
Unsettled stage II trickling filter effluent.
Unsettled stage II trickling filter effluent,
No. 2 aeration basin in service in place of
No. 1 aeration basin.
Unsettled stage II trickling filter effluent,
No. 1 aeration basin back in service.
Combination of unsettled stage II and primary
effluents.
Primary effluent.
Combination of unsettled stage II and primary
effluents.
Unsettled stage II trickling filter effluent.
White Rock final effluent.
Unsettled stage II trickling filter effluent.
White Rock final effluent.
Unsettled stage II trickling filter effluent.
White Rock final effluent.
Unsettled stage II trickling filter effluent.
Unsettled stage I trickling filter effluent.
White Rock final effluent.
                                 167

-------
the exact proportion of primary and stage II effluent in the influent is
not germane to the project.  One may correctly assume that the metals con-
tent of primary effluent is generally higher than final  effluent; and in
this regard, every effort was made to operate on the strongest wastewater
source and yet provide nitrification.

     Table 51 presents the average operating and process control  parameters
for the No. 1 activated sludge system during the entire  610-day period of
investigation.  The associated wastewater'characteristics follow them on
Table 52. There was a considerable variation in the operation of the system,
depending upon the time of year, organic,loading, etc.  The activated
sludge effluent quality was relatively constant, because the process
control parameters were adjusted in order to maintain consistency in
quality. During most of the period, effluent NH3 -N remained less than 1.0
mg/1.  Occasional temporary loss of complete nitrification, lasting per-
haps a week to ten days at a time, caused the average concentration to
slightly exceed 2 mg/1.  Control of effluent BOD5 and TSS was not easy
because of uncontrolled denitrification that occurred in the clarifier.
However, filtration of the activated sludge effluent indicated that about
80 percent of the BOD5, and roughly half of the COD were associated with
the particulate fraction.  All the parameters shown on Table 52 were
analyzed on a daily basis except for TDS and BOD5, which were generally
analyzed every fourth day.

     Summaries of the metals analyses on activated sludge influent and
effluent covering the entire period of investigation can be found on
Tables 53 and 54, respectively.  The tables list the median, mean, and
standard deviations, maximum and minimum concentrations, and number of
samples.  Infrequent extreme concentrations on some of the metals^tended to
weight the mean high.  Hence, the median values have particular significance,
since in many instances they are more truly representative of ambient_
conditions.   In most cases, the mean values do in fact exceed the medians,
the relative  difference representing the influence of extreme values.

     Because  the activated sludge process operated independently of the
downstream processes, the activated sludge metals data covering the entire
period of investigation are presented separately in this subsection.  In a
practical sense, the following comments will be applicable to the perform-
ance of the biological process within each of the three treatment
sequences studied.

Silver
11.1  	                                             .                 ?

     It became evident early into the investigation that very little silver
was present in Dallas' raw wastewater, in spite of some photographic
industries connected to the sanitary sewer.  Measureable amounts were
found in only 28 percent of the activated sludge influent samples and 21
percent of the effluent samples.  The maximum concentration ever observed
was five times lower than the current drinking water MCL of 0.05 mg/1.
Although a slight removal is indicated from the mean concentrations, silver
was not present at high enough levels to develop any definitive information
                                   168

-------
TABLE  51       HYDRAULIC AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR THE  ACTIVATED
               SLUDGE PROCESS
                         HYDRAULIC OPERATION
            Q (influent)

            Q (return)

            Q (waste)

            Aeration T
            Clarifier overflow rate(Q^)

            Weir loading

            Clarifier T (Q^Q^
                          PROCESS CONTROLS
            MLSS
            MLVSS
            RAS                    .      •
            SVI
            Air  supplied

            D. 0.
            D. 0.  Uptake  rate
            F/M  (COD)
            F/M  (SOC)
            F/M  (BOD)
            Sludge Age
            Temperature
 10,79 I/sec
 (171  gpm)
 10.3  -I/sec
 ("163  gpm)   ,
 6964  I/day
 (1840 gpd)
 1.95  hours
. 14.2  m3/day-m2
 (348  gal/ft2-day)
 33.6  m3/day-m
 2706  gal/ft/day
 2.76  hours
 3608 mg/1
 2619 mg/1
 7241 mg/1
 186 mg/1
 19.1 I/sec.
 (405 cfm)
 2.8 mg/1
 36.7 mg/l-hr.
 0.366 day"1
 0.039 day"1
 0.106 day"1
 7.9 days
 24°C
 (76°F)   •
                                  169

-------
TABLE  52.     PERFORMANCE SUMMARY,  NO.  1  ACTIVATED  SLUDGE SYSTEM

PARAMETER
COD
TOC, soluble
BOD
TSS
TDS
SC, ^mho/cm
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+N03-N
N02-N,
Total P
pH, units
T. Alk. as CaCOq
0
P. Alk. as CaC03
Total Count, per ml
Total MPN, per 100 ml
Fecal MPN, per 100 ml
A.S. INFLUENT
(mg/l)
241
26
70
137
522
788
14.0
9.8
1.1
0.12
10.1
7.3
208
0
2.1 x 106
2.0 x 107
2.5 x 10®
A.S. EFFLUENT
(mg/1)
60
11
30
29
511
717
2.3
4.0
8.9
0.2
8.0
7.1
116
0
4.9 x 104
5.5 x 105
3.8 x 104
REMOVAL .
percent
75.1
57.7
57.1
78.8
2.1
9.0
83.6
59.2
--
—
20.8
--
44.2
--
97.7
97.3
98.5
                                 170

-------
TABLE 53.     ACTIVATED SLUDGE INFLUENT METALS SUMMARY JUNE 1972 -
              JANUARY 1974
             MEDIAN
MEAN
Cf
MAX.
MIN.
Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
0.0
0.63
9.5
0.36
0.120
0.010
52.0
11.0
0.035
0.180
0.140
0.99
0.34
14.6
5.18
0.075
5.0
102.0
0.099
•0.100
4.2
9.4
0.88
3.6
0.270
0.78
0.66 --
14.8
0.37
0.129
0.014
54.6
14.0
0.039
0.205
0.224
1.07
0.43
14.5
5.18
0.076
15.2
99.5
0.109
0.108 '
7.2
9.8
0.79
3.9
0.366 ,
1.73
0.30
16.6
0.082
0.068
0.013
16.8
12.5
0.020
0.127
0.225
0.63
0.47
1.2
0.86
0.018
29.5
19.8
0.062
0.052
8.0
2.4
0.32
1.4
0.424
10.0
1.80
119.0
,- 0.65
0.48
0.04
144.0
119.0
0.12
0.75
1.04
7.80
3.2
16.8
8.12
0.13
170.0
148.0
0.38
0.45
40.0
17.0
1.25
8.5
4.10
0.0
.0.18
0.0
0.16
0.01
0.0
31.0
0.0
0.0
0.015
0.0
0.28
0.0
11.8
1.62
0.04
0.0
33.0
0.01
0.0
0.0
3.9
0.23
. 0.5
0.05
58
91
153
149
168
23
181
222
183
222
181
181
m
58
129
182
38
145
159
218
115
53
41
49
182
                        Concentration in  mg/1  (*ug/l)
                                  171

-------
TABLE 54.    ACTIVATED SLUDGE EFFLUENT METALS  SUMMARY JUNE 1972 -
             JANUARY 1974
             MEDIAN
MEAN
MAX.
MIN.
Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
0.0
0.29
9.0
0.36
0.060
0.0
47.4
6.0
0.030
0.060
0.051
0.35
0.15
14.1
5.01
0.052
2.4
96.5
0.075
0.040
1.0
9.4
0.83
3.0
0.110
0.38
0.44
13.4
0.37 .
0.070
0.005
51.9
7.1
0.036
0.071
0.072
0.61
0.26
14.1
4.96
0.056
3.6
97.2
0.082
0.050
1.7
9.4
0.72
3.3
0.139
0.85
0.53
12.9
0.075
0.047 ,
0.008
17.1
4.6
0.023
0.053
0.076
1.41
0.33
1.2
0.64
0.028
3.9
19.8
0.040
0.036
2.1
2.2
0.30
1.3
0.115
3.0
3.50
85.0
0.60
0.36
0.03
118.0
30.0
0.13
0.56
0.69
14.90
2.2
16.5
6.60
0.25
15.4
150.0
0.28
0.30
9.0
13.5
1.19
8.0
1.06
0.0
0.02
0.0
0.17
0.0
0.0
26.5
0.0
0.0
0.002
0.01
0.07
0.0
11.2
2.43
0.003
0.0
45.0
0.0
. 0.0
0.0
4.6
0.16
1.3
0.04
58
92
156
151
169
23
182
223
184
223
182
182
111
58
130
183
39
146
160
220
119
54
42
52
183
                        Concentration  in mg/1  (*yg/l)
                                 172

-------
concerning its removal.

Aluminum

     Aluminum removals by activated sludge averaged 33 percent (mean) or
55 percent (median).  However, the effluent concentrations were much more
variable than the influent, and exceeded the influent concentrations
approximately 10 percent of the time.  The influent frequency distribu-
tion was log-normal, whereas the effluent distribution clearly followed
a bimodal pattern.  Both the percentage of aluminum removed and the amount
removed exhibited a pronounced concentration effect, i.e., directly
proportional to the influent concentration.  Aluminum removal also
correlated somewhat with COD removal, the highest removals occurring at
COD removals of 70 percent or more.  High effluent concentrations also
coincided with high effluent COD and TSS.

Arsenic

     Arsenic was not significantly removed by biological  treatment, al-
though a slight overall decrease of 9 percent was obtained.  The activated
sludge unit did appear to smooth the fluctuations in influent concentra-
tions.  The drinking water MCL of 0.05 mg arsenic per liter was exceeded
only 3 percent of the time in both the influent and effluent.  The
removals exhibited a weak concentration effect, but zero  or negative
removals occurred on a 47-percent frequency.

Boron

     Boron was refractory to biological treatment, with no significant
removals or increases through the activated sludge process.  Based on
mean values, a 9 percent reduction was observed;  however, there was no
removal on the basis of median values.  The highest influent concentration
observed during the entire period of investigation was only 0.65 mg/1.

Barium

     Removals of barium in the activated sludge unit average 46 percent
by means, 50 percent by medians.   Reductions in concentration exhibited a
concentration effect at all influent concentrations (r=0.75), but a plot
of effluent versus influent concentrations  was  also linear(r=0.67). •  COD
removal and effluent COD and TSS concentrations behaved in a manner
similar to effluent barium concentrations.

Beryllium

     Analyses for beryllium were performed.on  a total  of  23 days scattered
over a period of 5 months.  The concentrations  observed in the activated
sludge influent were exceedingly low,  the highest being only 0.04 mg/1.
An average reduction of about 64 percent occurred through biological
treatment, but most of the effluent concentrations (61 percent) were  below
the detection limit.  Beryllium reductions  did  exhibit a  strong concentra-
tion effect at all influent concentrations  (r=0.89), but  the limited
                                 173

-------
amount of data prohibited any conclusive observations.

Calcium

     The activated sludge influent calcium concentration averaged 54.6
mg/1, and varied from 31 mg/1 to 114 mg/1.  The overall removal was 5
percent (mean), or 9 percent (median).  No significant correlations or
removal patterns were ever observed.

Cadmium
     A significant removal of cadmium occurred during activated sludge
treatment, 49 percent by means, 45 percent by medians.  A very pronounced
concentration correlation was observed for all influent concentrations
(r=0.94).  The only occasions when zero or negative removals occurred  was
when the influent concentration was less than about 10 mg/1.  The relative
fluctuations in concentration were also lower on the effluent than on the
influent.  In general, effluent concentrations increased with COD and TSS.
The highest concentrations of cadmium in the effluent happened to coincide
with low dissolved oxygen in the aeration basin (<1.0 mg/1), but cadmium
removals were not particularly influenced by the residual dissolved oxygen
concentration in the mixed liquor.

Cobalt
     Some cobalt roughly 8 percent  (by means) to 14 percent (by medians),
was removed through activated sludge.  No removal patterns or correlations
were observed.

Chromium
     Chromium was significantly removed by the activated sludge process.
The average removals were 66 percent  ( mean) to 67 percent (median), and
the removals were very consistent.  Chromium reductions exhibited a classi-
cal concentration correlation at all  influent concentrations.  A graph
showing the reductions versus influent concentrations appears on Figure
62.  The  linear correlation coefficient for the estimating equation is:
r=0.92  (N=222).  The percentage of chromium removed also exhibited a
concentration correlation.  In addition, COD removal was proportional to
percent chromium removal  (r=0.62) and chromium reductions (r=0.45).

Copper
     Copper removals  averaged 68 percent by means or 64 percent by medians.
The distribution of concentrations was skewed toward high values in the
influent and  low values  in the effluent, atypical of the patterns observed
for the other metals.  Like chromium, the reductions in concentration
through the activated sludge unit were strongly concentration-dependent
at all influent concentrations (r=0.94).  The removals also correlated
directly with COD  removal and inversely with TSS.  Significant copper
removals were observed,  mainly during nitrifying operations.
                                   174

-------
                                                                  en
                                                                  E
                        UJ

                        _J
                        u.
                                                                              ro
                                                                              O
                                                                              rd

                                                                              CD
                                                                              c
                                     o   •
                                    -C P
                                     00 •!-
                                        C
                                      "  rs
                                     to
                                     C  0
                                     O  Oi
                                    •r- -a
                                    •P  =3
                                     (C r—
                                     s-  10
                                    •p
                                     c -o
                                     0)  
                                     U T-
                                       p
                                    P  U
                                     c  ta
                                       ••
                                                                                 P
                                                                              (/)  O
                                                                              C  OJ
                                                                              P  CD
                                                                              O
                                                                              Zi  C
                                                                              •a  o
                                                                              a> T-
                                                                              S- P
                                                                                 ta

                                                                              =5 P
                                                                              •r-  C
                                                                              E  a)
                                                                              o  u
                                                                              s-  c:
                                                                              JZ  O
                                                                              o  u
                                                                             CO
                                                                             l£>

                                                                              0)
                                                                              ^.
                                                                              rs
                                                                              O)
co

o

-------
Iron

     As expected, iron was significantly removed by the activated sludge
process, 43 percent (mean), 64 percent (median).  Probability distributions
reflect a log-normal pattern for the influent and a bimodal  relationship
for the effluent, skewed toward the high side.  Only one extreme value
was picked up on the influent, compared to at least eight on the effluent.
However, effluent iron concentrations exceeded influent iron only at
influent concentrations less than 1.0 rng/1.  Iron reductions exhibited a
strong concentration effect (r=0.80), and the correlation between iron and
TSS was reasonably good (r=0.66).  All effluent concentrations of iron
greater than 1.0 mg/1 accompanied TSS concentrations greater than 45 mg/1.
The EPA Secondary Regulations recommendation of 0.3 mg/1 was exceeded in
99 percent of the influent samples and in 59 percent of the  effluent
samples.

Mercury

     Mercury removals could be characterized as moderate, ranging from 22
percent (means) to 42 percent (medians).  The activated sludge influent
concentrations exceeded the EPA maximum contaminant level for drinking
water (0.002 mg/1) on only 2 percent of the samples and the  activated
sludge effluent exceeded this concentration in about 1  percent of the
samples.

     No extreme values, or radical variations in the distribution, were
observed.  Negative removals occurred on 30 out of 110 sample days, zero
removals occurred on 5 days.  Reductions in mercury were strongly'
concentration-dependent at all influent concentrations, and  inversely
related to effluent NHo-N.    The largest reductions in mercury coincided
with low effluent NH -N.
                    «J

Potassium

     Potassium was essentially unaffected by biological treatment, but a
net overall removal of 3 percent (mean and median) was obtained. -Sludge
age and MLSS were the only parameters which demonstrated any correlation
with potassium removal.  In general, the removals increased  with both
sludge age and MLSS.  No concentration effects were observed.

Magnesium

     Magnesium was poorly removed by the activated sludge process, 4
percent  (mean)  and 3 percent (median).  A concentration effect was   ' ,
evident at influent concentrations greater than about 5.0 mg/1 (r=0.67),
the reductions increasing at higher concentrations.  The largest removal,
34 percent, occurred at the highest influent concentration,  8.1 mg/1.
Sludge age also appeared to exert a minor effect on magnesium removal.

Manganese

   Manganese removals averaged 26 percent (mean) or 30 percent (median),

                                  176

-------
varying from a minus 156 percent to a positive 96 percent.  However,
there were no extreme values in either the influent or effluent samples.
Mn reductions exhibited a concentration correlation (r=0.42), but negative
removals occurred in 8 percent of the paired samples.  Correlations between
effluent NH3-N, COD, and TSS concentrations, and manganese reductions
revealed inverse relationships in each case (r=0.46,-0.49,  -0.45,
respectively).  The EPA Secondary Regulations recommendation of 0.05 mg/1
was exceeded in 91 percent of the influent samples and 51 percent of the
effluent samples.

Molybdenum

     Substantial removal of molybdenum occurred through biological treat-
ment, 77 percent .by means and 52 percent by medians.  Complete (100 per-
cent) removal occurred on 7 out of 38 paired samples.  The activated
sludge  system provided considerable buffering for extreme influent values,
the influent and effluent probability distributions being quite dissimilar.
The influent probability distribution was skewed toward high values.
Molybdenum reductions also exhibited a pronounced concentration effect-at
all influent concentrations (r=0.99).

Sodium
      Sodturn,  like potassium, was poorly removed during biological treat-
ment.   However,  a mean removal of 2 percent and a median removal of 5
percent was obtained  on  the 145 paired samples.  The greatest reductions
were  obtained at low  F/M ratios, although the relative effect was minor.
There were no extreme values of sodium, and the highest concentration was
150 mg/1, roughly 50  percent over the mean value.

Nickel
      An  average  25  percent  removal  of  nickel  occurred  through biological
 treatment,  based on both means  and  medians.   Reductions exhibited  a
 strong  concentration effect at  all  influent  concentrations greater than
 about 0.06  mg/1  (r=0.78), with  negative  removals  occurring frequently at
 lesser values.   Nickel  reductions varied inversely  with effluent NH^-N,
 COD,  and TSS  concentrations.  There were no  extreme values of nickel in
 either the  influent; or  the  effluent samples.

 Lead

      Lead was significantly removed by the 'activated sludge  system,  53
 percent (mean)  and.60 percent (median).   The reductions exhibited  a
 strong concentration effect at  all  influent  concentrations  (r=0.78).  A
 reasonably  good correlation was observed between  lead  removal and  COD
 removal  (r=0.52).  .Likewise, high effluent TSS and  COD often accompanied
 low lead removals.   Out of  218  influent samples there  were only two
 extreme values (0.35 mg/1  and 0.45  mg/1), which were readily damped  by
 the unit.  The drinking water MCL  of 0.05 mg/1 was  exceeded  in 88  percent
 of the influent samples and 31  percent of the effluent samples.
                                   177

-------
 Selenium

      Selenium removal  averaged 76 percent  by  both means  and medians,
 ranging from negative  removal  to 100 percent  removal.  Reductions  in
 selenium were strongly concentration-dependent  over  the  entire range of
 influent concentrations (r=0.97).  The  activated sludge  system provided
 consistent buffering against high concentrations in  the  effluent.
 Removals were higher at sludge ages greater than about 15 days.  Also,
 correlations in  selenium reduction versus  effluent COD and NH3-N were
 both inversely related.  The drinking water limit of 0.01 mg/1 was exceeded
 in 24 percent of the influent samples,  but none of  the effluent  samples.

 Silicon
      Biological  removal  of soluble  silicon  averaged only 5 percent by
 means,  zero by medians.   No similarities  in  removal patterns were observed
 between silicon  and  other chemical  species.

 Strontium
                                                                     j
      Strontium  removal  averaged  9 percent  (mean) and 6 percent  (median),
 and  appeared  to increase with  increasing MLSS and decrease with increasing
 F/M,  COD,  and TSS.  The frequency distribution of both the influent and
 effluent adhered  to a bimodal  pattern, almost devoid of values in the
 0.30-0.65  mg/1  range.   However,  there were no extreme values in either
 case.

 Vanadium

      Removal  of vanadium averaged 14 percent (mean) and 17 percent (median)
 varying considerably within the  range from a negative 160 percent to a
 positive 100  percent.   A slight  concentration effect appeared to bias the
 reduction  when  the influent exceeded about 3.0 mg/1 (r=0.49).  It appears
 that  higher removals accompanied higher MLSS concentrations in the
 aeration basin, but the lack of  sufficient data limited any further
 analyses.  No extreme values were found in either the influent or the
 effluent samples.
     An averaged removal of 62 percent (mean) or 59 percent (median) was
observed for zinc over the period of investigation. .Reductions through
the activated sludge process clearly exhibited a concentration effect
(r=0.96).  There appeared to be a positive correlation between zinc
reduction and COD removal, and negative correlations between zinc reduc-
tion and effluent NH3-N, COD,  and TSS.  A few extreme values appeared on
the influent samples, but none in the effluent.  At no time did the
concentration of zinc in any sample reach the EPA recommended drinking
water MCL of 5.0 mg/1.
                                  178

-------
THE THREE COMBINATIONS OF TREATMENT SEQUENCES

     During the  610-day period covered by this report the Demonstration
Plant of the Dallas Water Reclamation Research Center was configured in
the three separate advanced wastewater treatment (AWT) sequences that have
been described in detail.  Tables 55 through 57 are the summaries of the
analytical data for each phase of the project, with the exception of the
metals data which are summarized in Tables  58  through 60 .

     Although the study of disinfection per se was not a direct part of
this research effort (with the very obvious exception of the virus
studies reported in the following section), it is interesting to
evaluate the microbiological data presented in Tables 55, 56, and 57.
During the high-pH  lime coagulation study  (Phase I) the upflow clarifier
was very effective as a disinfection process, and since the effluent pH
was not neutralized, regrowth or recontamination was not observed.

     The alum coagulation study constituted Phase II of the project, and
the reductions in coliform organisms resulting from the chemical treat-
ment process were only slightly greater than one log.

     Phase III, high-pH  lime coagulation and recarbonation, resulted in
significant reductions in bacterial populations; however, the neutralized
effluent was susceptible  to recontamination and regrowth.

     The influent and effluent mean metals  concentrations and the
corresponding removals are shown for all three phases  in Table 61,while
Table 62 presents similar information based on median concentrations.

Silver
     Silver was not usually present in a concentration high enough to
permit evaluation of its response to the various unit processes.

Aluminum

     Aluminum had the highest removal (78 percent based on medians) during
the alum coagulation phase; however, the removal decreased to five
percent when evaluated in terms of mean concentrations.  The lime
coagulation and recarbonation phase yielded a consistent removal of 77
percent (mean) and 75 percent (median);  furthermore,  this was the only
instance when the AWT processes reduced the arithmetic mean aluminum
concentration in the effluent.

Arsenic
     Arsenic was effectively removed by the AWT processes, and only
 slightly affected  by the activated sludge process, as shown in Figure
 63.  'The lime and  recarbonation study constituted the most successful
 treatment  sequence which resulted in removals of 83 percent (mean) and 79
 percent  (median).
                                  179

-------
                                                                                            I-

                                                                                            o
                                                                                            O
                                                                                            u
                                                                                            _!
                                                                                            D_
                                                                                            SI
                                                                                                    C
                                                                                                    rO
                                                                                                    rC
                                                                                                   T3
                                                                                                    C
                                                                                                    O
                                                                                                    O
                                                                                                    0)
                                                                                                    •P
                                                                                                    C
                                                                                                    01
                                                                                                    rC
                                                                                                    CU
                                                                                                    S-
                                                                                                    •P

                                                                                                    s-
                                                                                                    cu
                                                                                                    •p
                                                                                                    q-
                                                                                      0
                                                                                      •P
                                                                                      rO

                                                                                      0
                                                                                      •P
                                                                                      (/>
                                                                                      re
                                                                                      5
                                                                                                       (/)
                                                                                                       0
                                                                                                    (/)  0
                                                                                                   r-  O
                                                                                                    0  O
                                                                                                    >  S-
                                                                                                    0  Q.
                                                                                                    U  S-
                                                                                                   •i-  re
                                                                                                    E -i-
                                                                                                    0 -P
                                                                                                    i/i  i-
                                                                                                    i-  0
                                                                                                   < -P
                                                                                                   ro
                                                                                                    0
                                                                                                    S-
                                                                                                   u.
LO
CM
O
CM
IT)
                 O
                                  LO
                                                 180

-------


z:
o
i— t
%
—yr
*i_.
O
CQ
Qi

O
LU
o:
r-
3
O
I
i— i
200

h- CD
Z! P—
LU
h- LU
< CQ
Di LU
HCJ
LU
LU Q
*r i

_J LU
CQ
Q.UJ
1 >
O
in z;
CD
i — i •»
X CM

>- cr>
cc i—
s: LU
oo o
^ o
rf ?
01-
00
< CD
~~ 3
t—

_j LU
< z:
z: r>
< -D
•
LO
LO
LU
CQ
I-
H
z:
z: z: uu
CQ § 3
Qi _J LU
< O Lu
O O LU


e£
i— <
ao; h-
LU LU z:
SI-LU
r-l _J ID
_! LU Lu
r3 u.
2! LU
Oip-
o z:
|_LU
< ID
00 Zl
z: u_
LU LU
Q LU



n
LU r-
I— LU ZT
< CD LU
^> ^^ *"*5
h- —1 LU
O OO LU
< LU




Q
LU h-
h- LU z:
< CD LU
1-1 Z3 —I
h- -1 LU
o oo z:










a:
LU
LU
Qi
CL

CT> 00 VD LO
CM «tf f-s CO <* CM P- •
p-yDOOr>.VDr-OOp-CT> P- OP-







>^- en p- LO
CM CO CM CM 1^ O •* •
CM i st"! — ^DP-CMCMCTI.P- Oi —




LO LO CT) LO
O LO tD 00 P"s CTi ,CT) •
CMCTl<*l=J-tX)r-CMCMCTl O OP-






1

t— CTi "^ CTi CM LO LOr—
aip-CMCMLOhs'Nt-'d-co o cnrv







p~ r*^ ^o o
00 'LO|^O '00
r^CMCOCMOOr-VO'- • P- •
CM^OOp-LOCOp-CT>O O p-fv









CU
p- E
n u
3 v.. z in
r- 0 1 •*->
o ^: oo CL -r-
10 E z: o c
«tn i • + i «8
QOQOOOO «OOD)CM CM-)-1 '
OOOOOQOX i-o o on:
oi— CQI— i— ooz:oz: z: I— D
•

CO
i rt
u t
CM







!
Js*^
1^^
CM




LO
10
Vi**
CM








s*-
p—







O
CM







00
O
O
O
!
\
•
.(-


00
(V|
^ VI
CM








CO
CM




00
CM
CM









0








O







oo
o
o
(0
o
^0
(y
^f
CL



ID









CO




00






[/>
o
!»-*
X
o
•CM






to
o
X
CM
LO





1

&-
CU
ex
ft
•p
c
a
o
o
(0
•p
0
p-


CVl
VNJ








CM
V





00





LO
o"
p™ *
X
r-






O
P—
X
CM
^




1
O
o
p—

!~
0)
Q.
D-
2!
P™
rO
0
H


CM
V








CM
V





CM





t-

^T™
O
CO






D
o
P—
X
oo
vo




1
o
o
p~"

0
Q.
a.
2:
I1 " '
to
u
CU
Lu









-.

&
(0
•p-
(0
"^


^-
V
1









.
•a
CU
+->
o


l/l
(0
•p
CU
u
X
CU
p_
v^
01

c


c
o
•p-
(0
J.
4->
c
CU
u
c
o
181

-------
h-


















t

r-
2:
UJ
g
LU
o:
SCO
ID tv.
_j cn
*^ f""

QC LU
- iE.
—I UJ
^ ^*
"Z. O
^ 2:


•
LO

UJ
CO
H
tZ.
2: 2: uj
O S ID
DQ Z5 — 1
rv 	 in
«C O U_
O O UJ
l-iQi
O LU h_
LUH 2:
S — 1 LU
l— t t— ) 13
h-Lu-J
—1 U-
ZD 1 1
S UJ
Q;H
0 Z
h- LU
^C ~"^
CO _J
2: Lu
1 1 1 1 1
Q LU

O
LU h-
HLU2:
erT en 111
> Q ID
I— — 1 Lu
O CO Lu
< LU





Q
LU h-
H-LU2:
< CD LU
I— < 3 — 1
1— — 1 Lu
O CO 2:
cC i— i










C£
LU
LU
S
o;
D.


(V.

r- i— rv «3- LO CM OlLO O
CMCOOCOtO P- Ol£)O
CMCOUDr-LOrvCMCMCO O COrvp-




ID LO tv
00 i— 00 00 "st" O COCMVD
LOr-CMCM^lOCMCOCO O tv.tv.p-







CM {Q tO
CO O CM
rv cMrvo- -cMr- cocoto
COOCM'd-OLOOOO • • • -O
CMCMtO p-LOrvp-p-rp— O CTirvCM




co
o
o
(0
0) o
J— •
-Q E co
3  Q. Q.
f^ « *l
3 2: 2:
O Q- Q.

p— p— p—
rd rd rd
•P -P U
O O QJ
h- 1- Lu


























^
TJ
0)
•P
0

CO
rd
•P
O.
0)
o
X

en

c
•p-

co
c
o
'.p
rd
S-
•p
c

U
c
0
o
                  182

-------




















n:
H
i— i
3:
1-
LU
ST
^1.
LU rx
Di CD
Hr-
LU >-
jr iv
_i r>
:n et-
(-)
•
_* i
CD rv"i
h~l rx
^ CD
I*-""
o; oi
< LU
s: CQ
r> LU
co>
o
^«* ^^
h~
O.O
1— 1
o 2:

HH C 13
1 n f^

1 — — * -
~J ^,
<0
2: LU
^ CL


1^*
LO


LU
_J
CQ
H





























































~y
O
CQ
o:
<
o
<
f—H
o
LU
21
i— i
h-
_J
s:










o
LU
[—
<
>
i— i

<

Q
LU
<
1 — i
H-
O
<

















1-
2Z
2: LU
SZD
Z) _J
_J LU
OLu
O LU
H
^^
o; LU
LU ID
(— . i
-I Lu
H-l LU
LU LU
tl-
CQ LU
C£ ID
^ — J
OLU
OL LU
Qil-
(— LU
CO -1
Z Lu
LU LU
Q LU

LUp-
C5 *^.
Q LU
ID O
_1 _l
CO LU
I t
uu
LU


1—
LU -Z.
CJ3 LU
•=> —1
-J Lu
co -z.
1—1










OL
LU
1-
LU
*>T
^f
cf
Q.


t

00
rx r— tx
00 CO •
CO 00 CM ^" ^O CD CM




CO
LO •?}• rx
LO ^j" rx •
CM fx «vt- LO IO CD CM



^o
00 CD 00
1^^ ^O O^ i™" *
CM CD LO 00 LO CD CM


^h O
oo co rx
CO LO 00 O •
CM CD •* [X UD i— CM





o
tQ CM CD
1 n |w« f*f} ^4" FY^ IO .
l-l i "^ WJ VJ \* J VU
to i — co "^ LO rx i —




<3-
rx oo rx r— •
i — IX, CD 00 LO Ln •si'
CM CM l£> i— LO CO i—







CU
•- E
o o
^ x^
r- O
0 -C
00 £ •'

" LO 1
Q O O CO CO « 00
o o o oo o o :r
O (— CQ 1— 1— CO 21




1—
1—
.
r—




LO
r—
.
CM



p—
CM
CM


CM
CD
p—





00
^t
5^-




cr.
o
•
CD













~y

.
D)
i.
0




CO
.
O
r—




^J-
.
O





LO
CD


•
O
r~"






CD
CD





CD

O










2:
1
OO
0
2:
+
0^
2:



f^
r—
r—
.
O



p_
oo
i—
.
0


00
p—
1—
0


CD
O
O




00
LO
0
0




I—-
IK
.
o














2:
1
0^





CD CO ID
• • 00
O «3 CM





O (£> O
. . (T)
r— 103 CM




O Or-
r- IX, CM


LO
00 • *fr
• O O
r- r- CM






•vt" i — CD
rx rx p—




CM
• CM LO
O • i—
p- rx CM




o
o
o
fO
o

to
to fO
4->
CL T- •
C -^
p- 3 p-
(0 <
I-P- -
01 •
1- D-r-

co
O
p—
X
00

o oo

J-
o

X

.
0 p-
"m
O
p—
X
00
f\ I •
CM •
P- CM


O
00 CO



CO
O
i»
X
00
O CD



ID
O
r~™
X
CD

O r-

I™"*
E

0 00 S-
O CU
O Q.
rd
o •>
-p
W C
(0 3
o
• o
_^
p— p—
< (0
•p
0
Q- h-

0-J
o
r—
X
00
« CD
i— LO




in 4-
0 0

'x'x
CM LO
00 CM



[**« (.0
o o
X X
"vl- OJ

r- «*
p— p— •
E E

0 0
oo
r— i —
t- $-
CU 0)
Q. Q-

f\ A
21 "^- •
D- D_
3T ^r

p- P—
ns re
•p o
0 0
I-LU































.
-o
-p
o
E
to
fO
•P
o
1 '
CD
O

CU
P—
CJ)


c'
•I—
w
c
0

-p
fO
S-
•p
c
CU
o
E
O
o
183

-------
TABLE 58.   SUMMARY OF MEAN CONCENTRATIONS,
            HIGH-pH LIME TREATMENT WITHOUT RECARBONATION
            JUNE, AUGUST-OCTOBER 1972, NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 1973
METAL
A.S.
INFLUENT
A.S.
EFFLUENT
DENSATOR
EFFLUENT
 FILTER
EFFLUENT
 CARBON
EFFLUENT
Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
0.62
0.92
18.7
0.39
0.149
45.0
13.3
0.045
0.209
0.138
1.05
0.53
14.7
5.27
0.071
2.5
108.8
0.104
0.100
14.2
10.0
0.27
4.6
0.323
0.26
0.38
19.5
0.42
0.079
42.5
7.6
0.037
0.085 '
0.080
0.34
0.29
14.3
4.97
0.051
2.1
108.1
0.082
0.044 '
2.4
9.6
0.24
4.2
0.123
0.94
0.20
10.8
0.41
0.083 •'
156.1
7.6
0.058
0.012
0.056
0.30
0.14
14.5
0.99
0.010
4.2
117.3
0.052
0.039
1.9
13.4
0.23
3.6
0.063
0.94
0.29
7.0
0.41
0.092
156.1
7.4
0.057
0.009
0.066
0.12
0.094
14.7 '.
0.66
0.0061
1.7
117.1
, 0.042
0.040
2.04
6.7
0.23
2.4
0.048
0.62.
0.36
6.4
0.39
0.091
144.9
7.2
0.054
0.0095
0.071
0.064
' 0.11
14.5
0.58
0.0067
1.9
117.5
0.029
0.043
1.00
8.8
0.23
2.9
0.041
            Concentrations in mg/1 (*yg/l).
                                184

-------
TABLE 59.    SUMMARY OF MEAN  CONCENTRATIONS,
             ALUM TREATMENT    '
             NOVEMBER 1972 -  OCTOBER 1973


METAL
Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
S.i
v*
Zn
A.S.
INFLUENT
0,0
0,63
11.4
0.36
0.132
0.014
59.3
12.2
0.029
0.236
0.33
1.28
. 0.52
13.3
4.80 .
0.083.
20.9
92.0
0.114
0.121
4.6
10.3
4.8
0.520
A.S.
EFFLUENT
0.0
0.42
10.1
0.35
0.065
0.005
55.8
5.6
0.026
0.066
0.054
0.33
0.26
12.7
4.67
0.055
4.2
89.2
0.1079
0.054
1.1
9.7
4.2
0.156
DENSATOR
EFFLUENT
0.0
2.13
6.8
0.37
0.057
0.0005 .
69.4
4.1
0.027
0.023
0.034
0.16
0.32
12.5
4.58
0.037
3.1
89.3
0.068
0.042
1.0
10.4
3.9
0.109
Concentration in mg/l(
FILTER
EFFLUENT
0.0 .
0.78
. 6.1
0.38
0.056
0.012
68.6
4.0
0.027
0.019
0.056
0.13
0.25 '
12.3
4.65
0.030
3.8
88.9
0.070
0.040
1.2
9.7 •
4.0
0.106
*yg/D
CARBON
EFFLUENT
0.0
0.60
5.8
0.35
0.056
0.010
66.2
3.8
0.025
0.016
0.039
0.09
0.22
11.6
4.55
0.023
3.2
86.4
0.058
0.040
0.6 .
.9,9
• 4.3
0.067

                                 185

-------
  TABLE 60.   SUMMARY OF MEAN CONCENTRATIONS,
              HIGH-pH  LIME TREATMENT WITH RECARBONATION
              NOVEMBER 1973 - JANUARY 1974
        A.S.       A.S.       DENSATOR   RECARB.    FILTER     CARBON
METAL   INFLUENT   EFFLUENT   EFFLUENT   EFFLUENT   EFFLUENT   EFFLUENT
Al
As*
B
Ba
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
Mg
Mn
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
0.69
21.2
0.36
0.115
66.2
13.7
0.052
0.114
0.182
0.85
0.28
5.14 •
0.079
93.8
0.136
0.089
7.8
9.7
0.79
3.4
0.203
0.47
20.6
0.36
0.075
64.9
7.3
0.048
0.052
0.077
1.45
0.26
4.96
0.066
90.3
0.106
0.050
2.4
9.3
0.72
2.9
0.133
0.18
5.6
0.38
. 0.086
105.4
3.6
0.067
0.014
0.050
0.97
0.11
2.58
0.019
90.5
0.087
0.029
1.4
8.7
0.66
3.4
0.084
0.1.5
3.9
0.34
0.084
106.1
3.4
0.067
0.011
0.073
0.82
0.17
2.40
0.016
90.0
0.083
0.027
1.5
8.1
0.64
3.2
0.654
0.21
3.5
0.36
0.094
96.5
3.3
0.062
0.008
0.082
0.24
0.12
2.61,
0.017
82.5
0.072
0.026
1.7
7.6
0.66
3.6
0.532
0.16
3.5
0.32
0.086
101.2
3.0
0.063
0.006
0.054
0.20
0.08
2.46
0.17
81.7
0.078
0.027
0.7
7.3 '
0.64
2.0
0.617
                    Concentrations  in mg/1  (*yg/l)
                                 186

-------


oo
o
UJ •
1— 1
1-
z:
UJ
s:
u.
o
OL
S
UJ
_J
CQ
1-

ID
CQ
O
UJ
UJ
•z.
o
UJ
2:
^ o LO °^ co °0 O^CM cD'st-cocooooocoLnCMLO^CDi^r^rf- ior^
S3 ^J- in CM,—. ID r- CD CO CD LO r— rvCO ^VDCO 1 r— 00
1
(DO LO VO CD CO COO 1^
O LO LO i— CM CMi— OOCDCMIDLOCM "3- LO "N}- (O
U. O <£> 00 CO O O • 00 O O O O CM • LO O CM • O O «D CD COO
UJ OOLOOOOVOCOOOOOOi— •xtOCOCOOOOCD l-xTO
CM1^ CDtD CO "sti— O
(O  CD t— ,-j.
11 i
VD 
VD CMOO • (DOLOOcO *Di— I^[^.CM >s)-i—
U_ r— LO 00 O i— O O O O CM O "*O 'OOr^OOVOOUD
UJ IOOOOO li— COOOOOO ICMO ICOOOOI^OCMO
LO CM •vl' CM CD tD CD CO
CDCMUDr— CMI^LOi— COLnCO ^J-I^N COCOCO CD O
U_ ID'OOi— ••Or- r— CO CM r-O •r-O.';^CM
I-H IOCMOO 1  O O O CO CM CD O
LU OO^DOO Ir-I^OOOOOi— OOr-i— OOi-OOOCMO
CD LO CD CO r— CO •?!• O CO
CMCMI'^CD'sJ' OOO^OCOLOOOP^r^P^ "OOCMOI^v CM
LL. VD CD • CO i— • • O CM r- O LO • CM O LO CO r- i— • • CM J-r-OOOr—Oi— LOOCMr- OO'— r— O^O
_1
1— **** * * *
UJ O)r— (/) (0
-------


oo
_i
o
LU
•z.
h-
0
LU
SE
Lu
O
on
oo
CM
t.O
LU
CO
^







s:
CO
OL
LU
CC
LU
H- 1
)
O
LU
s:
»— i
_j

Q; CO r- CO CO O •* CO CT) *t O CO CF> ID CM LO i— CM O COO O 1 CO CO
fc3 i IN. LO  C7l CF> OOCOCD ILOO
&5 IIN.IN.CMCM 1 "shrNi— OltDhsCO ILOCO lr-«i-lDOr— CMCMLO
ii ' r~ '7
O O1LOO 1-O i— CO O CO 1 CO 1 O
&s i IIN.I— coi<^-cocMcr>iDcr>cy><"cr)CT> rNtocrii ICTI
CM
1 1 1
OOOOtDO  O O O O LO
COLOCMCO OO'vt'CntDOOCIi— IN, 'CTlOO ID O
LU O IN. "sl-i— • • O r— O O LO • CM O O O O i— • O CM ID CO
>-" oor-oo i <*i— oooi— Oi—LoocMr-ooi— cnocoo
_J
LxJ O)r™~ C/) fO QJ fO "O O S- 13 QJ O) O} C O fO *r" UQ Qj »r~ ^< *K d
ST "^C ^^ ^C CQ PO pQ t_) (^} CO CJ CO 1 1 ^T", ^*^ *>* ^^ gg^ ^^ ^P Q^ (f) (f) (f) ^^, [xj


0
r—
fO
•1—
to
P
o
1
1
r—
•X
D)
C
•p-
Concentratic
188

-------
Boron

     Boron was very refractory to all treatment processes, and no signifi-
cant statement can be made except that it was not removed.

Barium

     The removal of barium was quite variable ranging from 25 to 58
percent for means and 27 to 68 percent for medians.  As indicated in
Figure 64 the activated sludge process was responsible for most of the
barium reduction, with the AWT processes being rather ineffective.

Beryllium

     Beryllium was present at concentrations too low to permit evaluation
during this project.

Calcium
     Calcium was added in the form of calcium hydroxide during all three
phases of the project; therefore, the calcium concentration was increased
in all three phases as a result of the lime feed.

Cadmium

     Cadmium removal was generally good, with both the activated sludge
and AWT processes contributing to its removal as shown in Figure 65.
Cadmium was removed most effectively by lime and recarbonatibn sequence;
78 percent by medians.  These removals were the result of both the
activated sludge and AWT processes.

Cobalt
     Cobalt was removed only slightly by the activated sludge process, and
the data indicate slight removal during alum treatment; however, the
change in mean concentration was only 0.004 mg/1.  .Cobalt was added by
the treatment chemicals during both sequences involving lime as the
primary coagulant.

Chromium

     Chromium removals were excellent as Figure 66 indicates.  The lime
coagulation used in Phase I resulted in the greatest removal (95 percent
by medians), but lime and recarbonation resulted in the lowest median
concentration of 0.005 mg/1.  It should be noted that most of the removal
occurred in the biological process.

Copper

     The data in Figure 67 clearly indicate that the activated sludge
process was effective in removing copper and that the AWT processes
investigated were not effective.
                                  189

-------
       fO
       i.
      H-
       i.
       (t5
       U
 fC
 S-
h-
      C£      ro
              O
      •P      0
       3     o;
   >-  o  c
   -Ll .G T- ^
      -P  n3 -P
      •r-  J_ -r-
      2 h- 3

       0  E  0
       E  3  E
                                                                                   o
                                                                                   o
                                                                                       o
                                                                                       F—I

                                                                                   uj  sg;
                                                                                   Q  O
                                                                                       O
                                                                                      a.
                                                                                      s:
                                                                                      <
                                                                                      c/)
                                                                                  LU
                                                                                  00
                  •P
                  c
                  0

                  P
                  (0
                  0)
                  S-
                '  P

                  s-
                  0)
                  P
                  <4-
                  fO

                  J.
                  OJ   •
                  P co
                  1C 0
                  5 oo
                  CD 00
                  4-> 0
                  00 U
                  (0 O
                  S S-
                     Q.
                  C
                                                                                  c  to
                                                                                  o -P
                                                                                  •r- 'r—
                                                                                  -P  i-
                                                                                  (d  0 -
                                                                                  S- P
                                                                                  P
                                                                                  C "O
                                                                                  0  C
                                                                                  O  (0
                                                                                  c
                                                                                  o  >,
                                                                                  O  5-
                                                                                      fC
                                                                                  E-O
                                                                                  3  C
                                                                                  •r-  O
                                                                                  J-  O
                                                                                  
-------
     •P  (0  -P
>-   T-S-T-
UJ   3 I—  3
                                                                                        o
                                                                                        o
                                                                                        UJ
                                                                                        o_
                                                                                        00
                                                                                               4-1
                                                                                                E
                                                                                                cu
                                                                                                (0
                                                                                                0
                                                                                                i.
                                                                                               •p

                                                                                                s-
                                                                                                cu
                                                                                               •p
                                                                                                s.
                                                                                                OJ
                                                                                               •p
                                                                                                fO

                                                                                                CU
                                                                                               •P
                                                                                                W
                                                                                                fC
 E W
•r- (D
    (/)
 cn to
 c cu
•r- O
 E O
•r- S-
 fl3 D..


 I ^
    rd
 tO •!-
 E +->
 O S-
•r- 0)
-P -P
 fO
 S- TJ
•P E
 E (d
 0)
                                                                                               O  (0
                                                                                               O TD
                                                                                                   E
                                                                                               E  O
                                                                                               D  O
                                                                                               •r-  01
                                                                                               E  
                                                                                               T3
                                                                                               (0  >j
                                                                                               o .a
                                                                                               un
                                                                                               ID
                                                                                               s_
                                                                                               3
                                                                                               cn
                                                                                               •r—
                                                                                               U_
                          O
                                                   IT)
                                          191

-------
                                                                    u
                                                                    O
                                                                    UJ
                                                                    _j
                                                                    0.

                                                                    <
                                                                    00
                                                                            S-
                                                                            <1J
                                                                            -p
                                                                            s-
                                                                            a;  •
                                                                            p oo
                                                                            03 (U
                                                                            3 oo
                                                                             03
                  C •!-
                 •r- P
                  C S-
                 •r- 0)
                  (C P

                  0) T3
                  S- C
                    03
                  to
                  C >,
                  O i-
                 •r- (0
                 p-o
                  fO C
                  s- o
                 P O
                  C 0)
                  0) oo
                  o

                  §£
                  u
                    p
                  E c
                  D 0)
                                                                             O  (0
                                                                             i-  (U
                                                                            J=  S-
                                                                            O 4->
                                                                             0)
                                                                             s-
                                                                             3
                                                                             cn
o
OJ
o
r™

O
                                            LO
                                            o
o
o
                              192

-------
           (C
           S-
          rQ     (^
           s-    l-
           (0
           u
           0
          o;
              i.
              (0
              u
       -p     0
        3     C£
        O  E
       -c T- ^:
       •p  -    T-  S- T-
•U] -   2 H S

        0  E 0
        E  =3 E
       •r— r— *r-
       _j < _j
                                                            r
                                                         I
                                                      L
                                                                   F
                                                                                    UJ
o
•si-

CD
o
CO
                                    o
                                    CM
o

o
                                                                                    LU
                                                                                    U_
                                                                                    UJ   O
                                                                                    Q   O
                                                                                         UJ
                                                                                         _!
                                                                                         0.
                                                                                   UJ
                                                                                   00
                                                                00
                                                                <
o
o
                                                                               -p
                                                                               E
                                                                               0

                                                                               -p
                                                                               ta
                                                                               0
                                                                               S-
                                                                               0
                                                                               -p
                                                                               <4-
                                                                               (0

                                                                               S-
                                                                               0
                                                                               •p
                                                                               ,
                                                                                0)  i-
                                                                                S-  fC

                                                                                w -p
                                                                                E  S.
                                                                                O  OJ
                                                                               •1- -p
                                                                               -p
                                                                                S-  C
                                                                               •P  fD
                                                                                c
                                                                                OJ  >,
                                                                                u  s-
                                                                                E  (0
                                                                                O -D
                                                                                O  E
                                                                                   O
                                                                                S-  U
                                                                                0)  0
                                                                                Q- l/l
                                                                                Q.  .
                                                                                O  >>
                                                                               O JD
                                                                                                   sD
                                                                                S-
                                                                                13
                                                                                CD
                                 'I/Bui
                                                 193

-------
  Iron

     All of the treatment processes investigated were effective in re-
moving iron.  The peak in the lime and recarbonation curve shown in
Figure 68 resulted from ferric chloride feed to the aeration basin of
the activated sludge process..  The high-pH  lime coagulation train was
the most effective treatment sequence for removing iron, achieving 94
percent by means and 95 percent by medians.

Mercury

     Figure 69 showns the mean mercury concentrations at different
points in the treatment sequence for all three  sequences studied.  The
'high-pH  lime coagulation sequence resulted in the best removals of 79
percent by means and 92 percent by medians.  The lime and recarbonation
train resulted in the lowest concentrations of 0.08 mg/1 by means and
0.03 mg/1 by medians.

Potassium

     No significant potassium removal was observed in any process.

Magnesium

     Magnesium was removed by the two treatment sequences utilizing
high-pH lime coagulation.  Alum treatment was totally ineffective for
removing magnesium.  The best magnesium removal (93 percent by medians)
occurred during the lime-only sequence; however, some difficulty was
experienced during the lime and recarbonation phase in maintaining the
pH at or above 11.0 due to a shipment of low quality lime.  One would
expect both processes to be equally effective in magnesium removal.

Manganese

     As shown in Figure 70 both treatment sequences employing  hiqh-pH
lime coagulation were effective in removing manganese, as was the
activated sludge system.  The lime coagulation only sequence resulted
in the greatest removal (94 percent by medians) and the lowest concentra-
tion (0.004 mg/1 by medians).

Molybdenum

     No significant removal of molybdenum was observed.

Sodium

     No significant removal of sodium was observed.

Nickel

     Nickel removals were largest in the lime sequence, 72 percent by
means and 78 percent by medians.  The activated sludge process removed

                                  194

-------
                                                                                             -P
                                                                                             c
                                                                                             0
                                                                                             to
                                                                                             OJ
                                                                                             s-
                                                                                             •p

                                                                                             S-
                                                                                             
                                                                                             C -P
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             •r- T3
                                                                                             •P C
                                                                                             (0 n3
                                                                                             o; to
                                                                                             O TD
                                                                                             E E
                                                                                             O O
                                                                                             o o
                                                                                             C
                                                                                             O
                                                                                             S-
                                                                                                co
                                                                                                >,
                                                                                            00
                                                                                            ^O

                                                                                             
                                                   LO


                                                   O
O
  •
o
                                              195

-------
                                                                  o
                                                                  I—I

                                                                  <
                                                                  CO
                                                                  o
                                                                  UJ
                                                                  <
                                                                  00
                                                                                      •p
                                                                                       C
                                                                                       QJ
                                                                                       fd
                                                                                       OJ
                                                                                       S-
                                                                                      •p

                                                                                       s-
                                                                                       OJ
                                                                                      4-3
                                                                                      q-
                                                                                       rd
                                                                                       0)
                                                                                      •p
                                                                                       (/)
                                                                                       (0
                                                                                       s
                                                                                       C  (/)
                                                                                      •r-  0)
                                                                                          CO
                                                                                       a/ w
                                                                                       E  0)
                                                                                      •r-  U
                                                                                       C  O
                                                                                      •r-  S-
                                                                                          to
                                                                                      CO T-
                                                                                      C -P
                                                                                      O  S-
                                                                                      •r-  CD
                                                                                      •P 4->
                                                                                      fd
                                                                                      S- T3
                                                                                      •P  E
                                                                                      E  (0
                                                                                      01
                                                                                      o  (d
                                                                                      o -a
                                                                                          E
                                                                                      >> O
                                                                                      S-  O
                                                                                      3  0)
                                                                                      U  CO
                                                                                      s-
                                                                                      0)  >,
                                                                                      5T JD
                                                                                      01
                                                                                      10

                                                                                      0)
                                                                                      .$-
                                                                                      3
                                                                                      Q;
                                                                                      •I—
                                                                                      u.
LO
  •

o
•vi-

es
00

6
CM

O
o

o
                                    196

-------
          o
          0
         OL

         P
          3
          O  C
                1C
                S-
      .0
      S-
      ra
      o
      0
      a:
   >-
   LU
P  (0 P
•r-  S- T-
          0  E CU
          E  3 E
                        •
                                                                            LU
                                                                            O
                                                                            O
                                                          /
                                       LU
                                                                            Q  <
                                                                                O
                                                                                O
                                                                                LU
                                                                                _l
                                                                                D-


                                                                                oo
                                                                            LU

                                                                            <
                                                                                        (0
                                                                                        ,
                                                                                O  S-
                                                                                   fO
                                                                                         0 O
                                                                                         E O
                                                                                         tO 0
                                                                                         cn 
-------
 a significant amount of nickle in all three treatment sequences studied.

 Lead
                                                                    *
      Lead removal was good, generally averaging 60 to 70 percent.   The
 data shown in Figure 71 indicate that all three treatment sequences
 performed approximately the same, with the lime and recarbonation  phase
 having a slight edge.  The activated sludge process was  an important
 contributor to lead removal in all three sequences.

 Selenium
                     j

      As indicated in Figure 72, selenium removals were excellent for  all
 three treatment sequences.  When the median concentrations are  evaluated
 no selenium was present in the effluents from the alum and the  lime and
 recarbonation sequences.

 Silicon

      No truly significant  changes in silicon  concentrations were observed
 during this project.

 Strontium

      The  lime and recarbonation sequence made  the most significant  re-
 duction in  strontium concentration,  19 percent by means  and 26  percent
 by medians.

 Vanadium

      The  high-pH  sequences were  relatively effective  in  reducing the
 vanadium  concentration, with 41 percent  (by mean) being  the best (lime
 and  recarbonation).   The maximum  change  in mean concentration was 1 4
 mg/1.

 Zinc

      As shown  in  Figure 73 zinc removals were  excellent except for the
 recarbonation  study.  The  zinc  from the galvanizing was  solubilized by
 the carbonic  acid which resulted  in  the  obvious increases.  All  unit
 processes were effective in removing zinc  to  some degree, and an  over-
 all   removal  of 85  to 90 percent is a  reasonable estimate of the  treat-
ment  sequence  performance.
                                 193

-------
                                                      •P
                                                       c
                                                       0

                                                      •P

                                                       0
                                                       i-
                                                      -p

                                                       i.
                                                       01
                                                       0)
                                                      -p
                                                       01
                                                      -p   •
                                                       oo  co
                                                       (0  0)

                                                          oo
                                                       c  OJ
                                                      •r-  O
                                                          o
                                                       en S-
                                                       C  Q.
                                                      •r-  S-
                                                       rd  fO

                                                       0  -P
                                                       S-  S_
                                                          0
                                                       C  -P
                                                       o
                                                      •r-  T3
                                                      -P  C
                                                       (tS  CO
                                                       S-

                                                       c  ^
                                                       0  fO
                                                       U  "D
                                                       c  c

                                                       o  u
                                                          0
                                                      "O  00
                                                       rC
                                                       OJ  >,
                                                      _l  -Q
                                                       0
                                                       S-
                                                       D
                                                       en
199

-------
200

-------
                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                 LiJ
                                                                                                 _l
                                                                                                 Q.

                                                                                                 <
                                                                                                       •p
                                                                                                        c
                                                                                                        0)
                                                                                                        (0
                                                                                                        0
                                                                                                        S-
                                                                                                       •p
                                                                                                        0)
                                                                                                       •p
                         Ol
                        •p
                         (0
                         2
                         01
                        •p
                         (/)   •
                         fC  10
                         S  a;
                            w
                         C  t/)
                        •i-  QJ
                            u
                         D> O
                         C  S-
                        •r-  Q
                         C  ,
                        ••-  >>
                        m  s?
                        'E  re
                         OJ-r-
                         S- -P
                            5-
                         10  0)
                         C -P
                         o
                        •r- -D
                        P  C
                         (0^ fO
                                                                                                       5
                                                                                                       M J2
                                                                                                       00
                                                                                                       1^

                                                                                                       OJ
                                                                                                       i-
                                                                                                       ^
                                                                                                       O!
                                                                                                       •r™
                                                                                                       LU
CO
  *

O
o
o
                                     'ONIZ
                                                    201

-------
METALS REMOVAL SUMMARY

     This research effort generated an" exhaustive, amount of data which are
relevant to the metals removals that can. be. obtained from AWT processes,
and it is quite impossible to present an tndepth data analyst^ tn any single
document.  Many factors such as nitrification, the influent concentration
of the metal, pH, coagulant dose, and product water turbidity can have a
pronounced effect on the removal of a given metal in any given treatment
system.  Additionally, the data can be presented in terms of arithmetic
means, geometric means, medians, modes, etc.  Conventional practice is to
report arithmetic means, since most effluent limitations are based on
arithmetic means, and that practice was followed in this report to a
considerable extent; however, In many cases significant differences exist
between the arithmetic mean, the geometric mean, and the median concentra-
tion observed.

     Table 63 presents the observed changes in mean metals concentrations
that resulted from the chemical treatment process utilized during the three
phases of the research effort.  The reasons for increases in calcium,
barium, cobalt, and zinc have been previously discussed.  In almost every
instance the absolute value of the change in concentration was very small,
while the percent removal (or increase) was often substantial.

     Data relevant to percent metals removal by chemical treatment are
shown in Table  64.  Even though changes in concentration may be small,
metals removals of about 40 percent and greater can be considered signifi-
cant.  These data indicate that the high-pH lime coagulation processes
are generally more effective for removing metals.  This is especially true
of the toxic metals such as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, and lead.
In addition, the removal of both calcium and zinc would have been greatly
enhanced  with proper two-stage recarbonation facilities.

     Evaluation of metals removals by the filtration processes does provide
some meaningful insight as to whether the metal was in a soluble form or
in the solids carried over from the upflow clarifier.  Table 65 presents
the changes in metals concentrations that resulted from filtration, and
Table  66 shows the percent metals removal effected by the filters.  The
very slight increase in copper concentration is most probably an indica-
tion of copper pick-up from piping appurtenances such as bronze valve
seats, etc.   The other increases are slight.  In this respect aluminum
is a good example.  The data in Table 66 indicate increases in aluminum
concentrations of 45 percent for Phase  1 and 40 percent for Phase 2.  How-
ever, the data in Table 67 indicate increases in the aluminum concentration
of 0.09 mg/1 and 0.06.mg/l for Phases 1 and 3, respectively.  These in-
creases are so slight that one must conclude no significant change in
aluminum concentration resulted from filtration.

     Tables 67 and 68 present the observed  changes in metals concentrations
and corresponding percent removals as a result of both  chemical treatment
and filtration.  These data have been evaluated with respect to both percent
                                    202

-------
TABLE 63.    CHANGE IN MEAN METALS CONCENTRATIONS BY
            CHEMICAL TREATMENT
METAL
PHASE 1
(mg/1)
PHASE 2
(mg/1)
PHASE 3
(mg/D
Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Be*
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
+0.68
 0.18
8.7
0.01
+0.004

+113.6
0.0
+0.021
0.073
0.052
0.04
0.15
+0.2
3.98
0.041
+2.1
+9.2
0.030
0.005
0.5
+3.8 .
0.01
0.6
0.06
0.0
+1.71
3.3
+0.02
0.008
0.0045
+13.6
1.5
+0.001
0.043
0.020
0.17
+0.06
0.2
0.09
0.018
1.1
+0.1
0.011
0.012
0.1
+0.7

0.3
0.047
0.32
16.7
0.02
+0.009

+41.2
3.9
+6.019
0.041
0.004
0.63
0.09

2.56
0.05

0.3
0.023
0.023
0.9
1.2
0.08
+0.3
+0.521
            Concentration in micrograms per liter

            + indicates observed concentration increased
            -- Not Available
                              203

-------
TABLE 64.  PERCENT METALS REMOVAL BY CHEMICAL TREATMENT
METAL
	Percent Removal 	

PHASE 1         PHASE 2           PHASE 3
Ag
Al
As
B
Ba
Be
Ca
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg
K
Mg
Mn
Mo
Na
Ni
Pb
Se
Si
Sr
V
Zn
+261.5
47.4
44.6
2.4
+5.1

+267.3
0
+56.8
85.9
30.0
11.8
51
+1
80.
80.
.7
.4
,1
.4
+100.0
+8.5
36.6
11.4
20.1
+39.6
4.2
14.3
48.8
0.0
+407
32.7
+5.7
12.3
90.0
+24.4
26.8
+3.8
65.2
37.0
51.5
+23.1
1.6
1.9
32.7
26.2
+0.1
13.9
22.2
9.1
+7.2

7.1
30.1
                   1
68.1
81.1
5.6
+12.0

+63.5
53.4
+39.6
78.8
5.2
43.4
34.6

51.6
75.8

0.3
21.7
46.0
37.5
12.9
11.1
+10.3
+391.7
            +  Indicates observed concentration increased
             — Not Available
                               204

-------
TABLE 55.  CHANGE IN MEAN METALS CONCENTRATIONS
           BY FILTRATION
METAL
PHASE 1
(mg/D
PHASE 2
 PHASE 3
 (mg/1)
Ag*
AT
As*
B
Ba
Be
Ca
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
0.0
+0.09
3.8
0.0
+0.009

0.0
0.2
0.001
0.003
+0.1
0.18
0.046
+0.2
0.33
0.0039
2.5
0'.2
0.1
+0.001
+0.14
6.7
0.0-
1.2.
0.015
0.0
1.35
0.7
+0.01
0.001
+0.0115
0.8
0.1
0.0
0.004
+0.022
0.03
0.07
0.2.
+0.07
0.007
+0.7
0.4
+0.002
0.002
+0.2
0.7

+0.1
0.003
 +0.06
-0.4
 +0.02
 +0.01

 9.6
 0.1
 0.005
 0.003'
 +0.009
 0.58
 0.05

 +0.21
 +0.001

 7.5
 0.011
 0.001
 +0.2
 0.5
 +0.02
 +0.4
 0.122
          * Concentration in micrograms per liter

          + Indicates the observed metal concentration increased
          — Not Available
                              205

-------
TABLE 66. PERCENT METALS REMOVAL BY FILTRATION
METAL
PAHSE 1
.Percent  Removal

    PHASE 2
PHASE 3
Ag
Al
As
B
Ba
Be
Ca
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg
K
Mg
Mn
Mo
Na
Ni
Pb
Se
Si
Sr
V
Zn
0.0
+45.0
35.2
0.00
+10.8

0.00
2.7
1.72
25.0
+17.9
60.0
32.9
+1.4
33.3
39.0
59.6
 0.17
19.2
+2.6
+7.4
50.0
0.00
33.3
23.8
    0.0
    63.4
    10.3
    +2.7
    1.8
   +2300.
    1.2
    2.4
    0.00
    17.4
    +64.7
    18.8
    21.9
    1.6
    +1.5
    18.9
    +22.6
      0.45
    +2.9
    4.8
    +20.
    6.7

    +2.6
    2.8
+40.0
10.3
+5.9
+11.9

9.0
2.9
7.5
27.3
+12.3
70.8
29.4

+8.8
+6.3

8.3
13.3
3.7
+13.3
6.2
+3.1
+12.5
18.7
          +  Indicates  the  observed  concentration increased
          — Not Available
                               206

-------
TABLE 67. CHANGE IN MEAN METALS CONCENTRATIONS BY CHEMICAL
          TREATMENT AND FILTRATION
METAL
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
Ag*
Al
As*
B
Ba
Be
Ca
Cd*
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
V*
Zn
+0.68
0.09
12.5
0.01
+0.015

+113.6
0.2
+0.02
0.076
0.014
0.22
0.196
+0.4
4.31
0.0449
0.4
+9.0
0.04
0.004
0.36
2.9
0.01
1.8
0.075
0.0
+0.36
4.0
+0.03
0.009
+0.007
+12.8
1.6
+0.001
0.047
+0.002
0.20
0.01
0.40
0.02
0.025
0.4
0.3
0.009
0.014
+0.1
0.00

0.2
0.05
0.26
17.1
0.00
+0.019

+31.6
4.0
+0.014
0.044
+0.005
1.21
0.14

2.35
0.049

7.8
0.34
0.024
0.7
1.7
0.06
+0.7
+0.399
          * Concentration in micrograms per liter

          + Indicates the observed concentration increased
          -- Not Available
                               207

-------
TABLE 68. PERCENT METALS REMOVAL BY CHEMICAL TREATMENT
          AND FILTRATION
                          .Percent Removal
METAL
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
Ag
Al
As
B
Ba
Be
Ca
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg
K
Mg
Mn
Mo
Na
Ni
Pb
Se
Si
Sr
V
Zn
+261.5
23.7
64.1
2.4
+16.5

+267.3
2.6
+54.1
89.4
17.5
64.7
67.6
+2.8
86.7
88.0
19.0
+8.3
48.8
9.1
15.0
30.2
4.2
42.9
61.0
0.00  •
+85.7
39.6
+8.6
13.8
+140.0
+22.9
28.6
+3.8
71.2
+3.7
60.6
3.8
3.1
0.43
45.4
9.5
0.34
11.4
25.9
+9.1
0.00

4.8
32.1
55.3
83.0
0.00
+25.3

+48.7
54.8
+29.2
84.6
+6.5
83.4
53.8

47.4
74.2

8.6
32.1
48.0
29.2
18.3
8.3
+24.1
+300.0
         +  Indicates observed concentration increased
         -- Not Available
                              208

-------
removal and change in concentration, such that Table 69 could be presented.

  .   Tables 72 and 74 present data for metals removals by the activated
carbon adsorption process.  In all .cases the absolute change in concentra-
tion was small.  The carbon columns served as good filters; therefore those
metals which formed precipitates as a result of coagulation were removed
to some extent.  Iron, mercury, and copper to a lesser extent, are typical
examples of this removal.

     The carbon columns were effective in reducing the selenium concentra-
tion by at least fifty percent in all three phases of the study.  Signifi-
cant vanadium removals (20 to 44 percent) were observed in the carbon columns
when high-pH treatment was employed.

     The changes in the mean metals concentrations, and the removals ob-
tained by the AWT processes, are presented in Table 72.  These data
represent differences between the activated sludge effluent and the effluent
from the activated carbon columns.  The AWT processes were effective in
removing arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, mercury, magnesium,
manganese, nickel, selenium, vanadium, zinc, and to a lesser extent lead.
The other metals studied during this project'were essentially  unaffected
by the AWT processes used.

     In any facility being used for potable reuse it will probably be
totally impractical to monitor the concentrations of twenty-plus individual
metals on a continuous basis.  In many instances the time required for
analysis of a given metal is several tens of hours; therefore, one of the
major objectives of this research effort that was shared by all members of
the staff, was .the development of parametric relationships, that could be
used to predict the removal  of specific metals, without actually analyzing .
for the specific metal.

     Tables 73  through 75.present the results of some of the efforts at
parametric correlation.  In these studies linear regressions for every metal
were computed as a function of the other individual metals.  The linear
correlation analyses were performed for each metal at every point in the
treatment sequence.  Under each column, which represents a specific sam-
pling point,  the individual  metal-metal correlations with a correlation
coefficient greater than |o.80|are listed, along with the number of paired   •
data points used for the correlation.

     When evaluating these tables it is obvious that the more significant
correlations exist in the lower-quality, wastewaters, which could be anti-
cipated due to the improved analytical accuracy.

     Tables 73 and 75 indicate that aluminum is a good indicator for a
number of other metals, including mercury, cadmium, strontium, and
chromium.  Table 74 strongly suggests that beryllium should be a good
indicator for chromium, iron manganese, nickle, and lead.
                                   209

-------
I
                  TABLE 69.   SUMMARY OF METALS REMOVAL DEMONSTRATED.BY CHEMICAL
                              TREATMENT AND FILTRATION PROCESSES      ;
                  OBSERVED
                  PERFORMANCE
HIGH-pH LIME COAGULATION
AND RECARBONAT10N
                         ALUM
                         COAGULATION
                  Significant
                  Removals
                  Observed
AT
As
Cd
Cr
Fe
Hg
Mg
Mn
Ni
Pb
Zn
Se
As
Cr
Fe
Mn
Pb
Zn
                  No Significant
                  Removal
                  Observed
B
Ba
Cu
K
Mo
Na
Si
Sr
V
                         B
                         Ba
                         Cu
                         K
                         Mo
                         Na
                         Ni
                         Si
                         Sr
                         V
                                                   210

-------
 TABLE 7o.    CHANGE'.IN MEAN METAL CONCENTRATION
              BY ACTIVATED CARBON ADSORPTION
 METAL
 PHASE 1
 (mg/1)
 PHASE 2
 (mg/1)
 PHASE 3
 (mg/1)
 Ag*
 Al
 As*
 B
 Ba
 Be*
 Ca
 Cd*
 Co
 Cr
 Cu
 Fe
 Hg*
 K
 Mg
 Mn
 Mo*
 Na
 Ni
 Pb
 Se*
 Si
 Sr
 V*
 Zn
 0.32
+0.07
 0.6
 0.02
 0.001

11.2
 0.2
 0.003
+0.0005
+0.005
 0.056
+0.016
 0.2
 0.08
+0.0006
+0.2
+0.4
 0.013
+0.003
 1.04
+2.1
 0.0
+0.5
 0.007
 0.0
 0.18
 0.3
 0.03
 0.0
 0.002
 2.4
 0.2
 0.002
 0.003
 0.017
 0.04
 0.03
 0.7
 0.1
 0.007
 0.6
 2.5
 0.012
 0.0
 0.6
+0.2

+0.3
 0.039
 0.05
 0.0
 0.04
 0.008

+4.7
 0.3
+0.001
 0.002
 0.028
 0.04
 0.04

 0.15
 0.0

 0.8
+0.006
+0.001
 1.0
 0.3
 0.02
 1.6
+0.085
 *  micrograms  per liter

—  no data  available

 + increase  in  concentration
                               211

-------
TABLE 71.    PERCENT METALS REMOVAL  BY ACTIVATED
             CARBON ADSORPTION
                                Percent  Removal
 METAL
 PHASE 1
  PHASE 2
 PHASE 3
 Ag
 Al
 As
 B
 Ba
 Be
 Ca
 Cd
 Co
 Cr
 Cu
 Fe
 Hg
 K
 Mg
 Mn
 Mo
 Na
 Ni
 Pb
 Se
 Si
 Sr
 V
 Zn
 34.0
+24.1
  8.6
  4.9
  1.1
  7.2
  2.7
  5.3
+ 5.5
+ 7.6
 46.7
+17.0
  1.4
 12.1
+ 9.8
+11.8
+ 0.3
 30.1
  7.5
 51.0
+31.3
  0.0
+20.8
 14.6
  0.0
 23.1
  4.9
  7.9
  0.0
 16.7
  3.5
  5.0
  7.4
 15.8
 30.4
 30.8
 12.0
  5.7
  2.1
 23.3
 15.8
  2.8
 17.1
  0.0
 50.0
+ 2.1

+ 7.5
 36.8
 23.8
  0.0
 11.1
  8.5

+ 4.9
  9.1
+ 1.6
 25.0
 34.1
 16.7
 33.3

  5.7
  0.0

  0.9
+ 8.3
+ 3.8
 58.8
  3.9
  3.0
 44.4
+16.0
— no data available

 + increase
                                212

-------
TABLE 72.  CHANGE IN MEAN METAL CONCENTRATION AND PERCENT
           REMOVAL FOR THE AWT PROCESSES     '

METAL

Ag*
Al
As*
B
,Ba
Be
Ca
Cd
Co
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg*
K
Mg
Mn
Mo*
Na
Ni
Pb
Se*
Si
Sr
v*
Zn
PHASE
mg/1
+ 0.36
0.02
13.1
0.02
+ 0.012
-
+102.4
0.4
+ 0.017
0.076
0.009
0.28
0.18
+ 0.2
4.39
0.044
0.2
+ 9.4
0.053
0.001
1.4
0.8
0.01
1.3
0.082
1
(°/\
(/o)
(+138)
(5.3)
(67.2)
(4.8)
(+15.2)
f -- }
(+241)
( 5.3)
(+45.9)
( 88.8)
( H.3)
( 81.2)
(62.1)
(+1.4)
( 88.3)
( :863)
( 9.5)
(+8.7)
( 64.6)
( 2.3)
( 5:8.3)
( 8.3)
( 4.2)
( 30.9)
( 66.7)
PHASE 2
mg/1
0.0
+ 0.18
4.3
0.0
0.009
+.0.005
+10.4
1.8
0.001
0.05
0.015
0.24
0.04
1.1
0.12
0.032 .
1.0
2.8
0.021
0.014
0.5
+ 0.2

+ 0.1
0.089

(%}
( o.o)
(+42.9)
( 46.6)
( o.o)
( 13.8)
(+100 )
(+18.6)
( 32.1)
(. 3.8)
( 75.8)
( 27.8)
( 72.7)
( 15.4)
( 8.7)
( 2.6)
( 58.2)
( 23.8)
( 3.1)
( 26.6)
( 25.9)
( 45.4)
(+2.1)
( " )
(+2.4)
( 57.1)
PHASE
mg/1

0.31
17.1
0.04
+ O.OM
—
+36.3
4.3
+ 0.015
0.046
0.023
1.25
0.18
—
2.5
0.049
__
8.6
0.028
0.023
1.7
2.0
0.08
. 0.9
+0.484
3
(*)
(-- )
(66.0)
(83.0)
(11.1)
( +14.7)

(+55.9)
(58.9)
(+31.2)
(88.5)
(29.9)
(88.2)
(69.2)
( — )
(50.4)
(74.2)
( — )
(9.5)
(26.4)
(46.0)
(70.8)
(21.5)
(11.1)
(31.0)
(+370)
 *.  nricrograms- per  liter
 +  increase  in concentration
—  no  data available
                               213

-------





LU
gr
Z»-<
Px
3?-
LU X
a: CD
ct: t-i
ox
0
n
a: a:
< LU
LUH
z<
M LU Z
_io;o
COM
CD h-
Z Qi eC
M O Z
< O CQ
x coo;

CO O O
Z LU
O Lu C£
MO
h- H

t N-I'?
Z h-
LU 00 M
OH-2
Z Z
OLU h-
O M z
O LU
oo MS:
_) LuH

1— LU LU
LU O Oi
SOI-










t
CO
'^

LU
CQ

H

































































•X
OZ
CQ LU
air)

OLU
u.
LU





•X

fV [—
LUZ
1— LU
__j ^
M — 1
Lull.
Lu
LU







oil-
O Z
f-LU

OO _l
"^ t I
2. LU
1 1 1 1 1
LLJ U_
O LU








h-

LU

• _J
CO LU
• u_
< LU






1-
^y
LU
^3
00 LU
• Z





LU

O



. >

ft
• S-
* OO
O CT>
CO « •>
« JO T-
E D. CO
M
ft n 1
3 O r-
0 S i . <

en
E
'>
•»—N r~~
M 0
^-^ * -X * >
^j* *^f* ^j* . 'xj* ^j* . ^st* ^r **j* ^d" ^3* c
(d fd • "O • O fr- jQ " i. • i. i-'r-
CQOOOZD->COOOOOCO WE
E O
tf> to "o o to n
<;eCca;e£cC
T3fl3D)i-S-i- "E-r-i- •> M-'r-
OOXCOCOCOJDNOOOO> -P
a. id rd
t\ t\ t\ t\ ^ fi r\ t\ t\ • f\ t\ A «f-J ^p)
i— i— r— i— Id O S- Z3 (d'r- •!- Ofd0
<<<
(dS-0)T-rs_O" OWE
caoLuzjgoos> O^EM
ftftftftftftftf. o'1"1-^^
i— i— i— i— i— r-C-r- -XS-H
<<<<<
-------







2:
o
i— i
LU S
on 3
o; -i
o<
o
• ft
< LU
LU J-
Z <
I-H LU
CJ3
CJ3
S 0
§0
I CO
00 CD
2:
Ou_
HH f^

ef^-s
C£. i.
1 	
2:
LU 00
01-
2: 2:
OLU h-
O LU
oo I-H s:
-J Lu I—

1— LU LU
LUOQ;
2! O I—







^J"*
w

LU
CQ
H





















































o 2:
CQ LU
c£ ID
OLU
U_
LU




C£ | 	
LU 2:
1- LU

1 1 1 1
U_
LU





Dil-
0,2:
1— LU

(/) 	 |
2: u.
LU U-
Q LU






h-
2:
LU
ID
OO Lu
• Li_
< LU ,






1-
2:
LU
00 LU
• 2:
< M
*
^v.
• ft
O5
S
rt
CQ




LO
ft
0)
CQ
ft
<



*
00
ft
(U
CQ

ft
<





£
|^s
ft
O

ft
p—
eC








CTi
\^/

ft
CQ
#
n ^>,
s_
U n3
*—JP
•Si-
ft
0)
CQ ^£

* — s 1— (
1— 1 <• —

LO st *± LO
CO ft ft « «
" S- C . T- JD
05 0 S • 2 D.
rt ft ft rt
" 0) 0) 0 0)
CQ CQ CQ CQ CQ




O"> r—
r— i—
t nj ft ft
O Lu S£ (Q
2:

(U QJ T3 ft
CQ CQ O ^





i— CM
r— r—
ft CTi "
•p- ft »r—
OO (8 00
2:
ft ft
Ol « JQ
T* ^ n
O
O
,_
^~^ V
i— i
* — * S-
o * * en
CTl r— CD CO i v
O5 > i^ i^ 2! O
^>^ 0^
' rt ft > ft ft ,
" 
C
1 — 1
^^
1 — 1
215

-------















UJ
S
o!H
i— i
< Q.

uj ac
ct: to
f*S iTrrrl
[,Ta r™"l
o n:
o

0:0:
< UJ
UJ H
z<
t-H UJ
_1 Di
to
CO Z
z 0:0
hH Cj *""•
> h-

XCOZ
•O
c/> oca
z ct:
OU-<
1— U)
DiT01
UJ 00 w
OH3:
z z
O UJ H
O t-HZ
O UJ
cows
_ju.i-
1— UJ UJ
ui o ct:

*
Lf)
r**N
UJ
CO
f

H

O UJ
S -1
1"
rt
C
5:

rt
cu
u.


* 10
cvic\iCMC\jc\iLOLn"~i"Ln^2!x}.
•^••^•<^"<^"^f"lNi"<:;l" i>r'vr'srt3"

65£i£i£i£i2!lQ.'«/5
<<<5
-------
     The authors must emphasize the fact that the indirect parametric
determination of any water quality parameter is subject to considerable
debate.  The metals data developed during this project are not sufficient
to substantiate any definitive parametric, correlations.  One. of the more
important facts learned during this project was that it was totally
impossible to predict the concentration of a specific metal at any given
point in time and process.

     The percent of the total samples in the influent and effluent to
each of the three treatment sequences that exceeded the drinking water
limits is presented in Table 75.  Although when viewed in this manner
the total number of metals which pose treatment problems are small., the
metals that pose the problems all have demonstrated public health hazards.
It should"be noted that a metal that is present at the maximum contaminant
level (MCL) one day per year has a. recurrence percentage greater than
0.3 percent.

     A summary of metals removals is presented in Table 77.  When
evaluated in terms of maximum effectiveness for removing metals the lime
and recarbonation sequence would appear to be the most effective.  These
data were not obtained over the same time period, or over identical
sampling intervals, which makes data evaluation most difficult.

     The use of high-pH lime coagulation without recarbonation is very
unlikely; therefore; this treatment process is not included in the
summary.  However, certain data from Phase 1 were utilized to predict the
performance of the Phase 3 system.  Zinc removals should be good in the
recarbonation system, provided proper materials of construction are used.
Also the magnesium removals observed during Phase 1 of the study should
be typical  of a Phase 3 system.  During Phase 1 the upflow clarifier was
operated at a pH of 11.5, which was sufficient to precipitate magnesium
as a hydroxide.  However, during Phase 3 the operating pH was 10.5;
too low for excellent magnesium precipitation.

     From the data presented one must conclude that high-pH lime coagula-
tion and recarbonation is more effective in removing metals than is alum
coagulation.  These observations have been made after an extensive inves-
tigation of advanced wastewater treatment processes on wastewater from
the City of Dallas, Texas, where the industrial component of the waste-
water flow is about seventeen percent. Regional and/or geographical
differences could alter the reported results substantially.

     Table 78 may be the most significant approach to evaluating metals
removal.  In this table the concentration of each metal in the final
product water from each treatment sequence is evaluated as a function of
the maximum contaminant level (MCL).

     When the data in the Table 78 are carefully evaluated the following
facts cannot be escaped; arsenic, cadmium, iron, manganese, and lead
represent potential problems of undefined magnitude.'
                                 217

-------
                                                                                         ,10
                            LU
                                        OOOOi—C\lOOOO'3-C\JOO
                                                                       CVJ
                                                                  o en
                                                              -o
                                                              l.
                                                              (0
                                                              T3
                                                              C
                                                              (0
                                                              •P
                                                              GO
LU
                      O
                      UJ
                            LU
                                         I  OOOOOOU3OOOOO
                                                              0)
                                                              4->
                                                              (0
                      LU
                            u_
                                                    in
                                                                    cr> oo
a:
a
CD
                                                                                          r-     C
                                                              OJ JC
                                                              >  O
                                                              C1J  S-
                                                              i—  (0
                                                                                                   U
                                                                                                   (1)
                                                                                                   00
UJ
O
C£.
UJ
a.
                                        LO LO
                                                    i— LO
                                     OJ
                                     O Lf) LO
                           i CD
            OOOOOOOCOOOOOO

            OOi—i—OOi— OOOOOLO
                                                              (0 i—
                                                              E LO
                                                              (C O
                                                                                          O
                                                                                          3 -P
                                                                                                   LU
T3
 CU
CO
                            LU
                                         D)
                                                                          CO M
                                                                                          X en
                                                                                          (0 CU
                                                                                         2:0;
                                                                        O
                                                                        (U
                                                      218

-------
TABLE 77.  COMPARISON OF OBSERVED METALS REMOVALS
Metal Removal
(percent)
Phase 1      Phase 2       Phase 3
Lime         Alum          Lime and Recarbonation

90


Cr
Fe
Se
Mn

Cr
Fe


Cr
Se

70 - 90
                   Mg
                   Zn
                   Hg
             Zn
             Cu
             Se
             Mo
             Mn
              As
              Mn
              Cd
              Al
              Fe
              Hg
              Pb
              Cu
50 - 70
As
Al
Ni
Pb
Cd
Pb
Hg
Ba
                                              Mg
20 - 50
Cu
Cd
Ba
V
As
Ni
Be
Ni
V
Ba
Si
0 - 20
Sr
Si
Ag
B
Co
K
V
Na
Mg
Al
Si
B
Sr
Na
B
Increase
in Cone.
Na
Co
Ca
                                Ca
              Co
              Ca
              Zn
                                 219

-------
TABLE 78.
METALS CONCENTRATIONS IN AWT EFFLUENTS AS A PERCENT
OF THE MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED CONCENTRATION
Metal
Ag
As
B
Ba
Cd
Cr
Cu
Fe
Hg
Mn
Pb
Se
Zn

MRC*
0.05
0.01
1.0
1.0
0.01
0.05
1.0
0.3
0.002
0.05
0.05
0.01
5.0

Percent
Lime
1.2
64
39
0.9
72
19
7.1
21.3
5.5
13.4
86.0
10
0.8


of Maximum Recommended Concentration
Alum
0
58 .
35
5.6
38
32
3.9
30
11
46
84
6
1.3
Lime and Recarbonation
—
35
32
8.6
30
12
5.4
66.7
4.0
34
52 >'
7
12.3
              * Suggested by the most stringent value published
                (PEAW Standards).
                                  220

-------
                                 SECTION  10

                          VIRUS  MOTIVATION STUDY
GENERAL
     Water  supply  research  studies  of virus  removals in flocculation and
 settling  processes  indicated  removals in  the order of 95-99 percent(10, 11,
•12).  These  studies were based primarily  on  the use of alum and included
 an observation  that higher  usage of chemicals increased the virus removal
 efficiency.  Studies at the University of Illinois using bacteriophage
 showed 98 to 99.9  percent removals  (13).  These same studies were expanded
 to include wastewater and showed the effects of increasing concentrations
 of organics  on  depressing virus removal efficiencies.  These data indicate
 that virus  removals from wastewater by flocculation and settling processes
 can be expected to be in the  lower  range  of  the efficiencies cited above.

     As far  as  lime flocculation is concerned, the first reports of the
 effects of high-pH lime treatment in destroying bacteria date back to the
 1920's (14,  15).  More recent and detailed observations of these effects
 by South  African workers report marked differences in the response of gram-
 negative, gram-positive  and acid-fast bacteria.   The gram-negatives were
 the more.susceptible, and the acid-fast were the more resistant, excepting
 the spores  (16).  The survival of only a.relatively few gram-positive rods
was precisely   what was observed in Dallas,  with the critical  pH-contact
 time relationship appearing to exist in the  range of pH of 11.2-11.3 and
a time of 1.56  to 2.40 hours (17).   Berg, et al_.  at the National Environ-
mental Research Center (NERC) in Cincinnati  extended the studies of lime
flocculation and high pH to poliovirus type  1 and observed removals of  70
 to 99.86  percent from innoculated secondary  effluent, with higher removals
occurring at higher pH's (18).  When coupled with sand filtration, the
removals  increased to levels greater than 99.997 percent.

Operation of the Pilot Plant

     An activated sludge effluent was  processed  in the upflow  clarifier at
a rate of 6.31   I/sec (100 gpm).   The sludge  blanket in the upflow clarifier
was dropped to approximately the level  of the flocculator outlet at the
start of a run.  The fluidizer bar  was  turned off, and no sludge was with-
drawn or recycled during the run.   A residence time distribution function
study at this flow regime (Figure  74)  showed that in spite of  the 5  hour
and 10 minute theoretical  detention time,  peak dye concentration in  the
effluent occurred two hours  after  the  addition of a slug  load.   Nevertheless,
                                    221

-------
                                                            CU
                                                           s:
                                                           -p
                                                       UJ
                                                           •p
                                                            u
                                                       O   •!-
                                                            0)
                                                            CD S-
                                                            O 0)
                                                            0)
                                                            co rd
                                                            OJ t—
                                                            Di U
                                                            cu
                                                            CO
NOIlVyiN30N03 3AQ  1M 3NIN\/QOHy
                     222

-------
seeding of the poliovirus-phage mixture continued for  10 hours to assure
the achievement of a steady-state condition.  The comparison of results   -
obtained  during the last five hours would then be used in determining
separation efficiency.

    The polioviruses were handled as though they were  pathogenic organisms.
The effluent from the upflow clarifier was directed to a chlorine contact
basin where it was subjected to a dose of chlorine of  25 rag/1 free residual
for a period of 30 minutes, prior to discharge to the  raw sewage of the
White Rock Plant.  It was believed that this treatment would destroy the
viruses (19).  The chlorine contact basin was sampled  at different points
to check  on the virological performance of the disinfection process.

    Immediately after the last sampling, the upflow clarifier was taken
out of service.  Chlorine was admitted to achieve a 40 mg/1 free residual
level, the fluidizer bar was turned on, the sludge recycle pump was turned
on and the chlorine residual was maintained for 12 hours prior to dumping
the contents to the raw wastewater inlet of the White  Rock Plant.  This
treatment resulted in a bleached sludge, and it was hoped that this would
destroy all the viruses.  Sludge samples were taken before and after the
chlorination process and assayed for disinfection performance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS OF THE VIRUS RUNS

Virus Run Number One

    The frozen poliovirus stock was thawed in a water bath at 27°C.   The
thawed virus was aseptically divided into three gas-sterilized  is 9-liter
Cubitainers each containing 18.5 liters of sterile distilled water.   A
quantity of f2 coliphage was added to each container to give a countable
concentration in the effluent, assuming about 99 percent removal.   One of
the three Cubitainers was taken to the plant, immersed in an ice water
bath, and fed into the suction of the pump feeding the upflow clarifier
through a Gilmont No.  13 Flowmeter at 100 ml/min.   The other two Cubi-
tainers were stored in a refrigerator, and substituted in turn for the
depleted containers with only momentary seeding disruptions.  Each
container was well agitated and sampled prior to the beginning of the
seeding to check the diluted titer.

    During this run the upflow clarifier was  operated at a liquid alum
feed concentration of 103 mg/1  as the hydrated molecule.   This was  the
lowest concentration that provided a visual  appearance  of a high  quality
water passing over the effluent weir.   Turbidity as  monitored by the Hach
Continuous Flow Surface Scatter Trubidimeter  on the  day of the run
averaged 0.3 units.   The A1:P ratio was only  0.44.

    Chemical  tests were run frequently over  the 10-hour seeding  and
sampling period.   Table 79  gives the results  of samplings taken  at  the
beginning of the run,  at a midpoint, and again  at  the conclusion.  Some
analyses were also performed on shipped samples by NERC Cincinnati.   Where
                                  223

-------
TABLE 79.  CHEMICAL-PHYSICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER 1
TIME
5:00 AM
10:00 AM
                                                            3:00 PM
      INFLUENT*   EFFLUENT*   INFLUENT*   EFFLUENT* INFLUENT*  EFFLUENT*
Temp.0 C
pH, units
29
7.1
Alk.as CaCO 124
Cond. umhos 740
D.O.
Hardness
as CaCOa
Color
Turb.FTU
COD
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+N03-N
SS
Total P
3.9
130
50/40
8.5/11.0
56/52
0.4/0.4
4.3/3.8
4.0/4.9
24/27
11.3/10.
29
6.8
120
766
4.8
114
50.35
2.0/2.5
30/32
0.1/0.8
2.7/1.1
3.5/3.7
5/3
6 6.5/7.8
29
7.1
126
874
4.4
126
50.40
9.0/11.0
-/43
0.0/0.1
4.1/2.4
4.0/4.6
30/16
9.3/9.2
29
6.7
no
908
4.5
116
30
1.7
—
0.0
2.4
3.5
6
5.0
29
7.1
124
738
4.1
128
50/40
9.3/12.0
60/52
0.0/<0.1
4.9/3.7
5.0/5.9
32/24
7.5/8.1
29
6.9
110
772
4.4
120
40
2.5
,39
0.0
2.7
5.0
7
5.8
 * Influent to and effluent from Densator
 Denominator values are NERC analytical  results  on  shipped  samples.
 Concentration in mg/1 unless otherwise  noted.
                                  224

-------
 the  time  of  those  samples  coincide  with  similar  samples  run  by  the Dallas
 staff,  the NERC  results  are  shown as  a denominator value on  the  table.

     Coliphage  analyses on  the  three seeding  containers showed:

          Container 1             3.4  x 107 pfu/ml
          Container 2

          Container 3
                   Average
1.0 x 107 pfu/ml

2.8 x 107pfu/m1
2.4 x 10' pfu/ml
At the  100 mi/min seeding and 6.31 I/sec  (100 gpm) flow, an average
influent titer for the/coliphage of 6360  pfu/ml should have been expected.

    The results of the virus samplings are shown in Table 80 for coliphage
and Table 81  for poliovirus.  Influent and effluent analyses for both are
depicted graphically.in Figure 75.  Calculated removals were 46 percent
for coliphage and 63 percent for polioviruses.  All virus samples from
the chlorine contact basin were zero.  Poliovirus analyses of the non-
chlorinated sludge yielded 114 pfu/10 gm  of sample.  Chlorinated sludges
were negative for both poliovirus and coliphage.  However, the MPN tubes
on the chlorinated sludge yielded positives for coliforms.  Since virus
analyses on the chlorinated sludges were  negative, a mixing problem was
suspected.  The upflow clarifier was drained and a thick layer of sludge
was found to exist under the fluidizer bar.  Rubber scapers were then
mounted on the bar and three air-lift pumps were installed to take the
water from just above the fluidizer bar back to the mixing zone.  Two   '
test disinfection runs were performed and yielded no positive coliform
tubes.

Virus Run Number Two

    In the case of water treatment, it has been emphasized that coagulation
and filtration are really one process and must.be studied together (12).
The same logic can be applied to wastewater in a reclamation  operation.
In preparing  for the second run, therefore, some preliminary work was done
to determine  how to disinfect a mixed-media filter.  It was decided to add
calcium hypochlorite to the backwash water tank until  a 40 mg/1  free
residual was  achieved.   This was then admitted to the filter and the filter
allowed to soak overnight.  The filter was then backwashed.

    The upflow clarifier was still  operating on an  alum feed.  For this  run,
the control  parameter was not "Appearance", but rather the aluminum to
phosphorus ratio.   An effort was made to maintain the ratio in excess of
3.7:1  (20).

    Much the  same  chemistry was  run as in Virus Run Number One except
that Tablet,  showing  the results  at the beginning,  mid-point,  and end
of run, also  shows an entry for  BOD5.   The same tests  were run on the
                                   225

-------
TABLE 80.   COLIPHA6E RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER ONE
SAMPLE
           INFLUENT
             pfu/ml
EFFLUENT
  pfu/ml
BACKGROUND
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10JM
11 AM
12 N
1  PM
2  PM
3  PM
             160
            5240
            4000
            5400
            5500
            J400.
            5600
            4800
            6000
            5800
            2400
  156
  600
  640
  460
 3200
 3000
 3000
 2600
 3200
 1800,.
Average  last five hours        4920

Percent  removal:  46 Percent
                                     2680
 TABLE 81.    POLIOVIRUS  RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER ONE
SAMPLE
BACKGROUND
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
12 N
1 PM
2 PM
3 PM
INFLUENT
pfu/ml
0
510
620
550
440
400
660
620
590
610
500
EFFLUENT
pfu/ml
0
11
33
36
34
52
135
208
289
264
192
 Average

 Percent removal
               596
63 Percent
    218
                                 226

-------
                                                               0)
                                                               G
                                                              o

                                                               i-
                                                               0)
                                                              &
                                                               £
                                                               15
                                                               c
                                                               3
                                                              C£.

                                                               to
                                                               3
                                                               J.
                                                               CD-
                                                               E
                                                              •i—
                                                               S-
                                                               3
                                                              TD
                                                               0)
                                                               C
                                                          3    O
                                                          O
                                                         .C    
                                                              C
                                                              0)
                                                              3
                                                              0)
                                                              C
                                                              (0

                                                              •p
                                                              C
                                                              OJ
                                                              3

                                                              M-
                                                              C
                                                              LT5
                                                              0)
                                                              i.
                                                              3
                                                              O1
2OL  x  [ui/njd  «snaiAOITOd  I  3dAi
             227

-------
TABLE 82.    • CHEMICAL-PHYSICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER TWO


TIME
5:00
AM
INFLUENT* EFFLUENT*
Temp. ° C
pH, units
Alk. as
CaCOo
0
Cond. umhos
D.O.
Hardness
as CaC03
Color
Turb.
**FTU
COD
BOD5
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+N03~N
SS*
Total P **
22
7.1
145
574
4.8
183
40/22
4.5/5.6
28.49
12
0.3<.l
2 .4/2. 7
5.0/6.0
12/7.5
3.5/3.9
22
6.5
60
649
4.6
183
15
0.5(0
20
1
0.3
1.5
3.5
5(3)
0.2(0
10
INFLUENT*
22
7.3
170
597
5.3
253
30/27
.4) 3.5/5,5
36/65
10
O.K.I
2.5/3.1
6.5/5.6
16/10
.2) 3.0/2.7
:00 AM
3
EFFLUENT* INFLUENT*
22
7.2
no
658
• 5.9
243
10
0.6(0.4)
12
1
0.3
1.7
6.0
1 (2)
0.1(0.1)
22
7/4
175
629
7.7
222
30/13
3.3/8.
36/60
7
O.K.I
2.4/3.
7.0/7.
12/16
3.0/2.
:00 PM
EFFLUENT*
22
6.7
no
686
7.9
258
10
0 2.5(0.3)
24
2
0.3
1 1.5
6 6.0
12 (3)
9 0.3(0.1)
 *  Influent to and effluent  from  Densator
 ** Values in parentheses  on  filter effluent.
 Denominator values are NERC  analytical  results  on  shipped  samples.
 Concentrations mg/1 unless otherwise noted.
                                   228

-------
No. 1 mixed media filter effluent.  The filter effluent results for tur-
bidity, suspended solids, and total phosphorus are shown in parentheses.
The A1:P ratio was 7:1, due primarily to unexpectedly low influent total
phosphorus values.

   . The seeding technique for this run was similar to Virus Run Number
One except that the 5-gallon Cubitainers were made up freshly before each
use.  Additionally, assays for both poliovirus and colipnage were conducted
with the following results:
         Container
            No.
Time of Use
Poliovirus
  pfu/ml
Coliphage
  pfu/ml
                            5:30 - 9:00

                            9:00 -12:35

                           12:35 - 3:00
                 Average
                     2.0 x 106

                     2.3 x 106

                     2.3 x IP6

                     2.2 x 106
                1.2 x 107

                1.4 x 107

                1.0 x IP7

                1.2 x 107
At the same 100 ml/min. seeding and 6.31 I/sec flow rates, an. average
influent titer of 580 pfu/ml poliovirus and 3170 pfu/ml coliphage should
have been expected.  Cooler weather prevailed during this run and the
seeding containers were therefore not iced.

    The results of the virus samplings for coliphage are shown in Table
83 and for polioviruses in Table 84.  Figure 76 shows the influent titers
graphically; effluent recoveries were too small to show on a similar scale.
Calculated removals for coliphage were 99.845 percent on the upflow
clarifier alone and 99.985 percent on coagulation plus filtration.  No
polioviruses were recovered on the effluents, and based on a sensitivity
of assay of 0.5 pfu/ml, a greater-than 99.7 percent removal  was calculated.
Again, all virus samples from the chlorine contact basin were zero.
Poliovirus titers on the non-chlorinated sludge yielded 223 pfu/gm of
sample.  Chlorinated sludges were negative for poliovirus, coliphage, and
coliforms.  Filter backwash water was similarly^negative.

Virus Run Number Three

    In order to get as high a titer as possible, some staff members
wanted to slug dose the upflow clarifier with the two viruses.  Others,
who were more acute to the relatively higher pH-resistance of the
polioviruses, opted for the same type of seeding technique used in the
alum studies.  A compromise was effected in which it was agreed to add
the viruses in a steady stream over about a five-minute period.  Samples of
the seeded influent were taken midway through the seeding with the
following results:
                                  229

-------
TABLE 83.   COLIPHAGE RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER TWO
SAMPLE
BACKGROUND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
INFLUENT
pfu/ml
54
3200
2800
2400
3600
3400
2800
2700
2600
2200
2600
EFFLUENT
pfu/ml
0
0
0
0
2
2
4
4
6
6
0
FILTERED
pfu/ml
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
Average last   2580
five hours
Percent removal:

Densator:  99.845

Densator plus filter:  99.985
0.4

TABLE 84. F
SAMPLE
BACKGROUND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Average last
five hours
(Sensitivity

'OLIOVIRUS F
INFLUENT
pfu/ml
0
no
118
156
109
109
132
108
101
86 .
139
113
of assay =

lESULTS.VIRUS RUN NUMB
EFFLUENT
pfu/ml
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5 pfu/ml)

ER TWO
FILTERED
pfu/ml
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.
0
Percent removal: >99.7
                                  230

-------
    |W/rud  'SdNIAOnOd I  3dAl
o
LO
o
o
o
to
                                              CO
                                    o
                                    5


                                    s-
                                    0
                                    JD
                                    E
                                    2
                                    2:

                                    E
                                    13
                                    Qi

                                    CO
                                    3
                                    i.
                                                    CT;
                                                    E
                                                   T3

                                                 00 XI
                                                 S- 0)
                                                 rs E
                                                 O 'I-'
                                                -E to
                                              LO
                                                  r J2
                                                LU O
                                                S
                                                I— I CO
                                                I- -P
                                              in   E
                                                  ' 15
                                                   O
                                                   O

                                                   CO
                                                   •p
                                                   E
                                              CO   CD
                                                   0)
                                                   S-
                                                   3
                                                   CD
00
              C\J
                  s39VHdOiy310V8  ZJ
                 231

-------
TABLE 85.  CHEMICAL-PHYSICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER THREE


TIME -5: 15 AM
INFLUENT1 EFFLUENT2 INFLUENT1
Temp0 C 20 20 19
pH3, units 7.0 11.8-6.3 7.5
Alk. as
CaC03 150 195 142
Cond.
umhos 745 833 778
Color 40/20 0/11 50
Turb.
FTU 11.0/14 1.5/6.4 8.0
COD 40/34 28/15 ' 481
NH3-N 0.0/0.2 0.0/0.1 0.0
Org. N 2.7/2.2 1.0/0.8 2.7
N02+N03-N 12.0/10.7 9.0/10.4 11.5
SS 20/14 11/19 32
Total P 6*5/4.9 0.26/0.3 7.5
1 1nfluent to Densator
^ Effluent from Recarbonation
10:15 AM
EFFLUENT2
19
11.9-9
152
800
0
2.2
28
0.0
1.3
5.0
142
0.2


3:15
AM
INFLUENT1 EFFLUENT2
19 '
.6 7.2
136
760
50
8.5
48
• o.o
3.4
12.5
32
'7.5


19
11.7-8.3
332
980
5
1.0
16
0.0
1.8
11.5
61
0.33
\

3
Effluent pH values before and after recarbonation
Denominator values are NERC analytical
Concentration in mg/1 unless otherwise
results on shipped samples .
noted.


                                    232

-------
TABLE 85.   COLIPHAGE RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER THREE
SAMPLE
    INFLUENT
    pfu/ml
EFFLUENT
pfu/ml
BACKGROUND
     89
Seeding                        7.2 x 105
(4 min. 20 sees. 4400 mis mixed viruses)
All effluent samples
(Taken each 30 minutes for 10 hours)
Stock titer:
7.2 x 107   pfu/ml
TABLE 87.  POLIOVIRUS RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER THREE
SAMPLE
INFLUENT
pfu/ml
EFFLUENT
pfu/ml
BACKGROUND
      0
Seeding                        8 x 10
(4 min. 20 sees., 4400 mis mixed viruses)
All effluent samples
(Taken each 30 minutes 'for 10 hours)
Stock titer:
7.0 x 107  pfu/ml
                                 233

-------

























oo
H
_J
r)
00
LU
o;

Q
^^
H
co

3C
I—
5
o
a:
CD
LU
a:






















00
Q C£
LU 3
h-0
•z.
Ost
CQ CM
Qi
0=)
LU _
>X o


h-
2Z
LU
~~i
P— J
LU
LU
LU

z.
o
1— 1
1—

z.
o
m
a:

o
LU
a:







H
LU

LU
LU
LU

oi
o
c^
00
LU
O



1
E
CD

^s


•p
C
O
o
r~
r— g:
(0
•P i.
O 0
I- Q.

1
E
CD

53
•P
C
^
O
o
1—
r- E

•P S-
O 0
h- Q-






Q.



1
CD
o


•P
3
O
Or-
E
"(0 i-
•P 0
o a
—



X
a.


c
O 1 1 LO O 1
1 1 IV hx |-








•5t O 0 O 00 O
O|— O st- O
O Z. LO CO O
I— | — n r-
A cn A
r—



LO 1 O O O O
1 LO VD *£> ID










LO st- O sj- CO 00
CM CO ID CT> ID
CM CM




Sj- CM Si". O CO LO
rv iv & tv U3 rv





o p o o o o
.






O «D CO i—
CM r— LO CM CM VD
r— r— .




O 00 SJ- ^ CO CO
CM i— O i— i— i—
r— i— r- r— r- r—
oo
oo

LU
_J
QQ
•P
(0
a

0
r—
Q.

(0
00
CO    CO   CO    CO    CO    00



CM    co   sf-    LO    vo    rx
r-    r—   p—    i—    i—    i—
\    \   ^x    \    \    \
CM    CM   CM    CM    CM    CM
                                   234

-------
          Coliphage liter

          Poliovirus liter
                                    7.2 x TO7 pfu/ml

                                    8.0 x 10* pfu/ml
The Densator was operated  on  a  lime feed calculated as 391 mg/1 as CaO
and a  supplemental feed  of 18.6 mg/1  ferric  chloride as Fe.  The results
of the chemical analyses at three  different  times during this run are
shown  in Table85.   The  effluent samples were taken after recarbonation
— as  were  the virus  samples.   The results of the virus analyses are shown
in Tables86 and87 ;  all effluent  samples  (one sample for each virus every
30 minutes  over a  10-hour  period following the seeding) were zero.  The
results of  all the control  samples on the  terminal chlorination process
and on the  sludges were  also  zero. In  this high-pH lime run, the Densator
itself was  not terminally  chlorinated.  Instead,  the unit was isolated and
the sludges allowed to mix for  a number of days  until results of the
poliovirus  assay were received  from Cincinnati indicating there were no
polioviruses left.

    Although plant control, especially with  the  recarbonation process, was
not as good as desired,  the virus  results  obtained substantiated earlier
observations of effectiveness against coliphage  f2.  At this point in time
a new  problem developed.   Routine  bacterial  tests for total coliforms,
fecal  coliforms and total  plate counts were  showing a possible regrowth
of these organisms in the  recarbonated effluent  (see Table  88).  In
another check of regrowth,  a  one-liter grab  sample of Densator effluent
was taken to the lab  and a six-replicate total plant count was performed.
The sample  was recarbonated using  aseptic  technique and another six-plate
count  was made.  Lastly, the  sample was held at  room temperature for 24
hours  and a third  six-plate count  run.  The  results are shown in Table
89.
TABLE 89.
LABORATORY RECARBONATION AND REGROWTH
STUDY RESULTS

SAMPLE
p'H
Total Count/ml
Avg. of 6 plates
Range of
Counts
 Densator        11.1
   Effluent

 Recarbonated     6.8
 24  Hours
                6.6
                              11.2
                              10.5
6,000
                        5-20
                        6-17
5700-7400
 Virus  Run  Number  Four

     The  fourth  and  last  virus  run duplicated Virus Run Number Three'except
 for  some slight changes.   Better control over recarbonation was effected.
 Quicker  feeding of  the seed virus was accomplished,  Soluble TOC's were
 performed  rather  than COD's.   Finally, virus sampling was "limited to 14
samples collected over an 8-hour period (0,
                                                   2,2%, 3, 3^, 4, 4%, 5,
                                   235

-------
53s, 6, 7, and 8 hours after seeding) instead of every half hour over a
10-hour period.  Samples of the seeded influent water coming to the
Densator taken half-way through  the seeding showed the following titers:
             Coliphage liter

             Poliovirus liter
2 x 101* pfu/ml

4 x 10" pfu/ml
Chemicals used in the Densator for this run were 383 mg/1 lime as CaO and
9.3 mg/1 of Fe(Cl)3 as Fe.  The results of the chemical analyses at three
different times during the run are shown in Table 90.  The results of the
virus samplings are shown in Tables91  and 92.  All  effluent samples were
zero.  The results of all the chlorination controls were again zero.
Samples of sludge were taken 1, 2, and 3 hours after the seeding and again
24 hours later.  No polioviruses were found in any of these samples.  The
1-and 2-hour samples were not run for coliphage but the 3-hour and 24-hour
samples were.  One-half ml of the 3-hour sample plated directly as if it
were water yielded 9 plaques.  The 24-hour sample was plated directly and
also blended, centrifuged in a clinical centrifuge,  and the supernatant
plated; both yielded no coliphages.  Since the pipe and tap from which
the sludge samples were collected could not be sterilized, the integrity
of the samples are questionable.  Thus, negative assays would be meaningful
but positive samples could hardly be conclusive.

Summary

    The rather large-scale pilot-studies conducted herein demonstrated
that virus removals from secondary effluents by alum coagulation-
sedimentation and coagulation-sedimentation-filtration processes are
essentially as described in "the literature using smaller scale processes.
Removal of bacterial virus as high as 99.845 percent for coagulation-
sedimentation and 99.985 percent for coagulation-sedimentation-filtration
processes were observed at an A1:P ratio of 7:1.

    A marked decrease in virus removals was observed at a lower alum dose.
At an A1:P ratio of 0.44:1, removals of only 46 percent of f2 coliphage
and 63 percent of poliovirus by the coagulation-sedimentation process per ,
se_ were observed.

    High-pH treatment of secondary effluents achieved very high degrees of
virus removal.

    Bacteriological tests (total plate count procedure) of the recarbona-
tion process (used for pH neutralization) indicate that some bacteria
which gain entry to this process can reproduce in the recarbonation basin.
However, no viruses were found in the recarbonated effluents.

    Since the viruses that were added in these tests were probably not
imbedded in particulates that could protect them from the adverse high-pH
environment, these results must be interpreted with  caution.
                                  236

-------
TABLE 90.  CHEMICAL-PHYSICAL ANALYTICAL RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER FOUR


TIME
3:00
AM
INFLUENT1 EFFLUENT2
Temp °C
pH 3, units
Alk. as
CaC03
Cond. umhos
Hardness
as CaC03
Color
Turb.
COD
TOC •
sol
NH3-N
Org. N
N02+NQrN
SS
Total P
18
7.0
135
864
156
45.52
3.8/4.6
34/35
9/11.4
c
0.07 <0.1
3.35/2.3
9.5/9.7
2/10 . . '
10.3/10.3
19
11.0-6
400
1190
389
15/14
1.5/3.
21/27
9/9.8
0.15/0
1.67/1
11.5/8
1/7 ,
0.5/0.
7:
INFLUENT1
18
.0 7.2
135
828
133
35
2 4.0
29
n
.2 0.14
.9 2.70
.2 8.5
4
2 10.3
00 AM
EFFLUENT2
18
11.0-6
435
1260
403
15
1.5
17 -
6
0.13
1.61
10.5
0
0.4

INFLUENT1
18
.5 7.1
135
824
151
35
4.5
21
11
0.04
2.80
8.5
. 4
10.3
11:00 AM
EFFLUENT2
18
11.3-6.1
450
1270
415
15
2.0
8
0
0.11
1.99
10.0
8
0.5
  1
  2
  3
Influent to Densator
Effluent from Recarbonation
   Effluent pH value before and after recarbonation
   .Denominator values are NERC analytical  results on shipped samples.
  Concentration in mg/1 unless otherwise noted.
                                   237

-------
TABLE 91.   COLIPHAGE RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER FOUR
SAMPLE
    INFLUENT
                                   pfu/ml
EFFLUENT
                             pfu/ml
BACKGROUND
     28

    ,n4
Seeding                        2 x
(4 nrin., 6 sees. 4000 mis mixed viruses)

All effluent samples
(14 samples collected over 8-hour period)
Stock titer:
9.3 x 107 Pfu/ml
TABLE 92.   POLIOVIRUS RESULTS, VIRUS RUN NUMBER FOUR
SAMPLE
    INFLUENT

    pfu/ml
EFFLUENT

pfu/ml
BACKGROUND
     0
Seeding                        4 x 104
(4 min., 6 sees. 4000 mis mixed viruses)
All effluent samples
(14 samples over 8-hour period)

Stock titer:
5.7 x 107 pfu/ml
                                 238

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read InOnictions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
  EPA-600/2-80-149
               3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  THE REMOVAL OF METALS AND VIRUSES  IN ADVANCED
  WASTEWATER TREATMENT SEQUENCES
               5. REPORT DATE
                  August 1980  (Issuing  Date)
               6. PERFORMING-ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  Steven E. Esmond,  Albert C. Petrasek, Jr.,  Harold
  Wolf, D., Craig Andrews
               8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
               10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

                  1BC611
  Texas A&M University
  Dallas, Texas  75201
               11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                             S-801026
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Municipal Environmental  Research  Laboratory—Cin.,OH
  Office of Research  and Development
  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
  Cincinnati, OH 45268
               13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                Final  June 1972-Dec. 1973
               14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                  EPA/600/14
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
  Project Officer:   Irwin J. Kugelman  (513)  684-7633
16. ABSTRACT
       An extensive  study of metals and virus  removals by advanced wastewater treat-
  ment processes was conducted in Dallas, Texas  from June 1972 through  December 1973.
  Processes applied  to a biologically nitrified  effluent included chemical  coagulation
  with alum and/or lime, high-pH lime treatment  with and without recarbonation, filtra-
  tion through multi- and dual-media filters,  and carbon adsorption.  The high-pH lime
  treatment with recarbonation provided a most effective treatment for  both metals
  removals and disinfection.  Boron surfaced as  a material that may require other means
  of control.  Although high-pH, lime treatment was indicated to be extremely effective
  for virus removal  (or inactivation), metals  removal  were not of the same order of
  magnitude.  Thus,  efforts to control metals  at points of discharge are  strongly
  supported. \ The removal of some metals by biological processes appeared to be in-
  fluenced by' their  concentration.  Median values were observed to be more indicative
  of the plant processes than mean values.  Coliphages were observed to provide essen-
  tially the same virus removals values as polioviruses.  The suggestion  is made that
  all wastes should  be subject to biological treatment, and if such treatment is
  found ineffective, then other means of control  are warranted.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
  b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C. COSATI Field/Group
  Water Reclamation
  Water Resources, Heavy Metals
  Advanced Waste Treatment
  Disinfection
   Metals Removal
   Virus Removal
    13B
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
  RELEASE TO PUBLIC
  19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)'
     Unclassified
                                                                         21. NO. OF PAGES
                                                                               259
  20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)

     Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
239
                                                        •fr U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:  1980--657-165/0148

-------

-------