EPA/600/3-91/063
                                           December 1991
GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING EARLY LIFE  STAGE  TOXICITY TESTS

          WITH JAPANESE MEDAKA (ORYZIAS LATIPES)
                            BY
 DUANE  A.  BENOIT,  GARY W.  HOLCOMBE,  AND ROBERT L. SPEHAR

           U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

         ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY-DULUTH

                  DULUTH,  MINNESOTA 55804
          ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY-DULUTH

             OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

            U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                   DULUTH, MINNESOTA 55804
                                          Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
                      NOTICE

This document has been reviewed in accordance with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy and
approved for publication.  Mention of trade names
or commercial products does not constitute endorse-
ment or recommendation for use.

-------
                                   CONTENTS
                                                                     Page
Foreword  	  ^
Abstract  	  5
1.   Physical System
      1.1   Diluter	6
      1.2   Toxicant mixing and flow splitting  	  6
      1.3   Test tanks	6
      1.4   Embryo incubation cups  	  7
      1.5   Dilution water  	  8
      1. 6   Loading and flow rate	8
      1.7   Aeration	8
      1.8   Test water temperature  	  9
      1.9   Photoperiod and lighting   	  9
      1.10  Cleaning	9
      1.11  Disturbance	10
      1.12  Construction materials  	 10
  2.   Chemical System
      2.1   Preparing  a stock solution   	 11
      2.2   Measurement of toxicant concentration  	 11
      2.3   Measurement of other variables   	 12
      2.4   Residue analysis  	 12
3.    Biological System
      3.1   Source of  test fish	13
      3.2   Preliminary tests 	 13
      3.3   Obtaining  embryos .	14
      3.4   Embryo filament removal 	 16
      3.5   Embryo exposure	17
      3.6   Embryo hatch	18
      3.7   Larval exposure	19
      3.8   Calculation of results	20
References     	22
                                       3

-------
                                   FOREWORD



      In recent years the Japanese Meclaka, Oryzias latipes. has become  an



important test animal for use  in evaluating carcinogenesis.  A review of the



literature by Couch and Harshbarger  (1.) revealed that the medaka are known  to



be quite susceptible to some classes of chemical carcinogens.  Hawkins, et  al.



(2) have also demonstrated the development of chemically induced tumors in



several medaka organs such as  the liver, kidney, eye and muscle.  Because of



the medaka's apparent sensitivity to chemically induced tumor development,  its



short life cycle time, rapid growth and well known culture techniques,  the



U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Research Laboratory in



Duluth, Minnesota recently began a medaka chemical carcinogen screening



program.  The USEPA at Duluth  is also currently evaluating the medaka for use



in developing freshwater aquatic life criteria documents.



      This procedural guide is based upon evaluations of published papers and



recent methods development: work conducted at the U.S. EPA laboratory in



Duluth, Minnesota.  The purpose of this report is to provide information and



basic guidelines for conducting an early life stage toxicity and/or carcinogen



test with medaka.  This test starts with 24 hour old embryos and ends 4 weeks



after hatch.  The guideline also describes recently developed methods for



shortening the hatch period and methods for incubating embryos without the  use



of chemical treatments to control fungus.   It is also the intention of the



authors to make these procedures compatible with ASTM's Annual Book of ASTM



Standards:   Guide for Conducting Early Life-Stage Toxicity Tests with Fishes,



(Volume 11.04;  designation E1241-88).  The report has been reviewed by the



Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth,  U.S.  Environmental Protection



Agency,  and approved for publication.  Mention of trade names or commercial



products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                                   ABSTRACT



This manual represents a procedural guide for conducting embryo-larval early



life stage (ELS) toxicity tests with Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes).   These



procedures are based upon evaluation of published papers and recent methods



development work conducted at our laboratory in Duluth.  The published papers



are referenced in the appropriate places throughout the text of this report.



If more detailed information on test: apparatus or specific biological and



chemical methods is desired, the reader is encouraged to study the reference



material or contact one of the authors of this manual.  All routine methods



not covered in this procedure (physical and chemical determinations), should



be followed as described in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and



Wastewater (3).  Those routines dealing with handling of fish not covered in



this procedure should be followed as described by ASTM  (4).

-------
                                  CHAPTER 1



                               PHYSICAL SYSTEM








1.1 Diluter



Intermittent-flow proportional diluters (5,  6) or continuous-flow serial



diluters (7,  8) should be used.   The operation of the diluter should be



checked daily,  either directly or through measurement of toxicant



concentrations.  A minimum of five toxicant  concentrations with a dilution



factor not greater than 0.50 and a control should be used for each test.








1.2 Toxicant Mixing and Flow Splitting



If a proportional diluter is used, a container to promote mixing toxicant and



diluent water should be used between the diluter and test tanks for each



concentration (9).   Separate flow splitter delivery tubes should run from this



container to each replicate tank.  If a continuous-flow serial diluter is



used, additional mixing containers are not: needed, but separate flow splitter



delivery tubes must run from the diluter to  all test tanks.  Delivery tubes



are allocated to tanks by stratified random assignment (random assignment of



one delivery tube for each, level of concentration in a row followed by random



assignment of the duplicate delivery tube for each level of concentration in



the other row).  Flow splitting accuracy should be within 10% and should be



checked periodically to see that the intended amount of test water reaches



each tank.








1.3 Test Tanks



All test tanks should be made either of glass or stainless steel.  Glass is



usually preferred because it is less expensive.   Typically, duplicate test



tanks have been arranged in two rows back to back with test concentrations



assigned by stratified random assignment.   Many sizes of test tanks have been



used successfully.   Any tank size, shape and depth is acceptable if the flow

-------
rates and loading requirements can be achieved.  One small test tank which has
been used routinely for medaka ELS tests is described as follows:
Up to sixty medaka (hatch-1 month old) have been tested in each tank
(duplicate tanks per treatment) that measured 133 x 178 x 127 mm high
containing 2000 mL of test water with a water depth of 85 mm and a flow rate
of 33 ml/minute.  Water levels were controlled by a side drain in the end of
each tank.  Side drains were covered with a removable 40 mesh (40 openings per
inch) cylindrical stainless steel screen to prevent loss of 1-10 day old fish
after which a 20 mesh cylindrical stainless steel screen was used to prevent
loss of 11-28 day old fish.  It is also recommended that a circulating water
bath system be used with the test tanks so that temperature differences
between tanks can be held to within + 0.5 °C.

1.4 Embrvo Incubation Cups
Embryo incubation cups  (Figure 1) are made from 20 ml glass scintillation
vials with the bottom portion cut away leaving a 4.5 cm upper portion to form
the cup.  Sixty mesh Nitex screen is glued over the 1.5 cm ID mouth of the
vial.  The bottomless vial is then inverted and a # 5 1/2 neoprene rubber
stopper with a 1 cm hole bored through it is inserted into the cut end of the
vial  (2.5 cm ID).  A 20 gauge stainless steel wire loop handle about 3.5 cm
high  is shaped and inserted into the upper end of the stopper.  During embryo
incubation the small cups are oscillated vertically 2.5-4.0 cm in the test
water by means of a rocker arm apparatus driven by a 10 rpm motor (Figure 2).
The combination of this size motor and cup configuration causes each embryo  to
move  up and down in the vial with a cascading  rolling motion.  Recent studies
at our laboratory have  shown that this method  of embryo incubation for medaka
greatly shortens the time  to hatch period  (mean test days to complete hatch  @
28°C - 7.5; mean hatch - 96%).  The method also significantly reduces the
number of  fungused embryos throughout the  incubation period as compared  to the
embryo incubation system  used  for fathead minnows which utilizes a 2 rpm motor

-------
                                                 B
Figure 1. Medaka embryo incubation cup made from a 20 ml glass
         scintillation vial (A) with 60 mesh Nitex screen (B) #5.5 rubber
         stopper (C) with a 1 cm hole (D) and wire handle (E).

-------
        c
        o
        "cO
   ^ r-  -Q
^=  CD
u.  C
CD  C
     -
     o
     co
       .9 O
             co
             CO
        CO
     v- .2
     o  c
     o  2
     (- ^ O  i P TT
     l^sSIa
     C  CD O
     "COO
     CO  CO ^
             C    fO
             co ^ m
     i; c  . 5o co
     H	CJ) >s ^ <^
     o_ 9~ E "CD co ID
     S o 2 £ "5 o
          D*^ -T*
        __ ^P«M» ^P»«
        9-T
                 CM
             ^5 C

     l-^|!m
     52 2 £ g_5
     ^ m O '> 9- m
     Q. CO

     CNJ
CLL.Q.CO-O o^ p
•"• >—*    f— •— *-	 c
p -a ?
               CO
^
E
   o


m S?
CO .^
^^ *^^

£S x
i
 CO *-~>


 CO o

| O
 o "^
 o fo
a: E

c\i
 0)
 D
 O)
LJL
     9.0
     42 -8
o .*-
^ ca
c S
o ^
JZ ^
O) O jT*
l!s
r- E o
           CO ^  CD O
          •»-• C ^5 __
     CO
        CO W
        05 CD
     *-/ r~ p~ vw
        C~ •*— riN
        O O
        Q CO C
     •D p CD O
     cz ^ ^ *-^
     fO S2 •— ~o

     ? CD ® r-
     0
     CO ^
     .£ co
                    CO
     -So
     CO *~*
           co
     a ||

     c/f o ^5
     c ^—• ^
     *-.
     5 CD CNJ
          in
      w T3  Q. CO

      O CD  O CO

      O w'  O
      to S  O

-------
 drive  (10).   These  studies have  also  shown no  increase  in  larval mortality
 and/or deformities  at hatch.

 1.5 Dilution  Water
 The water used  should be  from a  well  or  spring,  if at all  possible, or  from  a
 surface water source (4)   Only  as a  last resort should dechlorinated water
 from a municipal water supply be used.

 1.6 Loading and Flow Rate
 The loading in  test tanks should not  exceed 0.1 gram of fish per liter  of test
 water  passing through the tanks  in 24 hours (4).  Flow  rates to larger  test
 tanks  (10-20  liter) should be at least 6-10 water volumes  per 24 hours.  Flow
 rates,  to the smaller test tanks (0.5 -  2.0 liter) should  be at least 20-24
 volumes per 24  hours.  During a  test, flow rates should not vary more than 10%
 between any tanks.  Flow rates should be great enough so that dissolved oxygen
 does not drop below 60% of saturation (4) or toxicant concentrations drop by
 more than 20% when fish are in the test  tanks.  Flow can be increased above
 those  specified rates to maintain proper dissolved oxygen  or toxicant
 concentrations.   With a continuous flow  diluter system  delivering one tank
 volume every hour, oxygen levels can be maintained above 75% in 2 liter volume
 tanks  containing 60 four week old medaka.

 1.7 Aeration
 Diluent water should be aerated vigorously (with oil-free air)  or passed over
 a screen column with a recirculating pump before flowing through the diluter.
Aeration of diluent water will eliminate supersaturation of dissolved gases
 and also ensure  that dissolved oxygen concentrations will be at or near
 saturation (90-100%).   However,  the test tanks themselves should not be
aerated (aeration can alter toxicity by driving of volatile chemicals and it
 is also difficult to aerate all tanks at exactly the same rate).

-------
1.8 Test Water Temperature
Test water temperature should not deviate from 28°C by more than +1°C  and
should not remain outside the range of 26 to 30°C for more than 48 hours at a
time.  At a minimum, temperature should be measured in one tank at each
toxicant concentration once a week, alternating between duplicate tanks from
week to week.  Temperature should also be recorded daily in one control tank.

1.9 Photoperiod and Lighting
A 16-hour light and 8-hour dark photoperiod controlled by an automatic timer
should be used throughout the test in order to provide long daylight feeding
hours and to promote normal maturation.  A 15-30 minute transition period
between light and dark is optional (11).   Cool white fluorescent tubes have
been used successfully for embryo-larval tests and light intensities at the
water surface have ranged from 20-60 lumens (12).  The intensity selected
should be duplicated as closely as possible for all test tanks.  Another
option for lighting is a. 50:50 combination of Durotest (Optima FS) and wide
spectrum Grow-Lux fluorescent tubes.

1.10 Cleaning
Incubation cup screen bottoms should be cleaned periodically after embryos are
removed.  Screens can usually be cleaned with tap water pressure, and/or a
small brush.  After hatch is complete and larvae swim-up all tanks should be
carefully  siphoned at least three times a week and scraped if algal or fungal
growth becomes noticeable.  Siphoning should be done just before the last
feeding of the day.

Siphoning can be done safely with a large pipette  (50 ml) fitted with a
squeeze bulb or with a siphon hose leading to a white dishpan.  Fish which are
siphoned accidentally can be observed easily in the pipette or white pan and
returned carefully to the tank without harm.

-------
1.11 Disturbance



Fish should be shielded from excessive disturbances such as people walking



past the tanks or extraneous lights that might alter the intended photoperiod,







1.12 Construction Materials



Construction materials which contact the diluent water should not contain



leachable substances and should not absorb significant amounts of substances



from the water (4).   Stainless steel and glass are the preferred construction



materials.  Rubber and plastics containing fillers, additives, stabilizers,



plasticizers,  etc.,  should not be used.  Teflon, nylon, and their equivalents



are not known to contain leachable materials, nor do they absorb significant



amounts of test substances.  All batches of neoprene stoppers should be



checked for toxicity prior to use in the diluter and exposure tanks.  Static



tests at the U.S. EPA, Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, have shown



that certain lots of neoprene stoppers are acutely toxic to fathead minnow



larvae (S.J. Broderius,  personal communication,  U.S. Environmental Protection



Agency, Duluth MN 55804).
                                      10

-------
                                  CHAPTER 2
                               CHEMICAL SYSTEM

2.1 Preparing a Stock Solution
Distilled or diluent water should be used in making up the test stock
solutions.   The development of several chemical saturators for use with
hydrophobic chemicals has eliminated the need to use carrier solvents with
most test chemicals (13-17).

If carrier solvents other than water are absolutely necessary, they should be
of reagent grade or better but the amounts used should be kept to a minimum.
Triethylene glycol (TEG) and dimethyl formamide (DMF) are preferred, but
methanol, ethanol or acetone can also be used.  The calculated solvent
concentration to which any test organisms are exposed should never exceed 0.1
ml/liter.

When a carrier is used, use two sets of duplicate controls.  One set should
contain no solvent and one set should contain the highest concentration of
solvent to which any organism in tha test is exposed (4).

2.2 Measurement of Toxicant Concentration
At a minimum, the concentration of toxicant in the test water should be
measured in one replicate at each toxicant; concentration every week,
alternating weekly between replicates.  Water samples should be taken about
midway between the top and bottom and the sides of the tank and should not
include surface film or material stirred up from the bottom or sides of the
tank.

Methods described in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (18)
and Manual of Analytical Methods for the Analysis of Pesticides in Human and
Environmental Samples  (19) should be used when possible.  Accuracy should be
                                      11

-------
measured using the method of known additions for all analytical methods for



toxicants.   Reference samples should be analyzed periodically for each



analytical method.








2.3 Measurement of Other Variables



Dissolved oxygen and pH should be measured at each concentration at least once



a week, alternating weekly between replicates.








A control,  high and median test concentration should be analyzed at least



initially for alkalinity, hardness, conductance and turbidity to show the



variability in the test water.  If any of these characteristics is affected by



the toxicant, that characteristic should be measured at each concentration at



least once a week and alternated between replicates.  Alkalinity, hardness,



conductance and turbidity should be measured at least once a week in alternate



control replicates for the duration of the test.








2.4 Residue Analysis



After the ELS test is complete all surviving fish may be analyzed for toxicant



residues.  Additional samples for analyzing toxicant residues can be measured



during the test, if desired, to determine the toxicant uptake curve.  The



frequency and amount of samples taken will depend on the test objectives.



Since medaka usually are consumed whole by predators, whole body residues



should be reported.
                                      12

-------
                                  CHAPTER 3
                              BIOLOGICAL SYSTEM

3.1 Source of Test Fish
Sufficient numbers of embryos can be transported by express from a brood stock
culture unit to other laboratories or field sites to initiate an early life
stage test.  These embryos should be shipped in well-oxygenated water in
insulated containers.

It is, however, recommended that a laboratory brood stock culture unit be
started at your facility by obtaining embryos from another well-established
culture unit such as is maintained at the Environmental Research Laboratory in
Duluth MN.  Guidelines for the culture of several life stages of the medaka
can be obtained from the Environmental Research Laboratory in Duluth, MN (20).

At 27-28°C and a constant 16-hour day light  photoperiod,  fish fed unrestricted
quantities of live brine shrimp nauplii will mature in 3-4 months.  With
proper care and maintenance these adult fish will produce quality embryos for
6-8 months (20).

3.2 Preliminary Tests
Selection of ELS test concentrations, a critical part of the experiment,
should be made using the utmost judgment and care.  All embryos or larvae used
in preliminary and ELS tests should be taken from the same adult stock.  As a
general rule, one should conduct a small scale 96-hour static range finder
test  (five concentrations plus control) with ten 1-2 day old larvae in each of
six 250 ml beakers with 200 ml of test water in each beaker.  Test beakers
should be covered (i.e., with parafilm) to slow evaporation and to reduce the
loss of volatile chemicals.  Larvae need not be fed during the 96-hour test.
The selection of range finder concentrations (based upon previous toxicity
information and/or saturation concentration) should be spread out by as much
                                      13

-------
as a factor of 10 depending on how much is known about the test chemical.  If
the chemical in question is highly volatile and/or more than 20% is lost
during the range finder, then the test: may have to be conducted as a renewal
test or possibly even as a flow-through test.  Throughout the 96-hour test,
all fish should be carefully observed so that not only mortality is noted but
also any behavioral effects such as abnormal swimming, surfacing,  nervous
movements, or lethargy.  Concentrations which produce definite behavioral
effects during the 96-hour larval test will usually cause significant survival
and/or growth effects during the longer ELS test.

Depending on how distinct the effects are from the range finder test, the
investigator may then either set up another static preliminary test with a
dilution factor of 0.5 or conduct a small scale 10-12 day flow-through
exploratory test (0.5 dilution factor, five concentrations plus control) with
ten 1-2 day old larvae (fed live brine shrimp).  Either test should be based
upon the most sensitive indicator of stress observed during the range finder
test.

If mortality was the only observed effect during preliminary testing, then the
highest test concentration selected for the ELS test should be no less than
the 96-hour LC20 and no more than the 96-hour LC50 calculated from the
preliminary tests.   If distinct behavioral effects were the most sensitive
indicators of stress then the highest test concentration selected for the ELS
test should be equal to that concentration.

3.3 Obtaining Embryos
It is desirable to have a medaka culture unit located on site so that the
cultures can more easily be managed to provide adequate embryos at the proper
time.  Two days before the ELS test  is to be started all spawning sponges (20)
in the culture unit are removed and cleared of embryos.  Since medaka nearly
always spawn during the early daylight hours (21),  these sponges should be
                                      14

-------
cleared in the afternoon.  Some females may still be carrying their egg clutch



from the morning spawning but to prevent injury to the brood stock it is not



recommended that these clutches be removed.







Maximum numbers of similar age medaka embryos (<24 hours old) can be obtained



for testing if the sponges are not replaced in the spawning tanks until the



very late evening hours  (shortly before photoperiod controlled lights go out)



on the day before embryos are to be collected.  By that time all of the



females carrying clutches from the previous day will have dropped them and



most of the females spawning during the early morning hours of that day will



also have dropped them.  By using this technique, about 85-95% of the embryos



collected the following afternoon are less than 24 hours old.







The following afternoon all sponges with embryos are removed from the spawning



tank and suspended in a shallow white dishpan in flowing water (-50 ml/min @



27-28°C) (20).   A rough estimate of total number of embryos is also made at



this time to determine if there are enough to start an ELS test (20).  The



embryos are left to develop on the sponges overnight, and are removed the next



morning to start the test.  This important step helps to reduce fungus growth



during embryo incubation.  With the aid of a dissecting scope, 24 hour old



viable embryos (neurula  stage) can easily be staged and counted.  Nonviable



eggs and fungused, opaque or abnormal appearing embryos, as well as 48 hour



old embryos (optic lens  and cup stage) laid by females which were still



carrying egg clutches when the spawning sponges were replaced in the tanks,



can also be identified and discarded.  It has been our experience that medaka



embryo viability can be  expected to be 95-98%.







Prior to staging each group of embryos, the long sticky filaments are removed



from the chorion of each embryo as described in the following section.  If



filaments are not removed, embryos will be difficult to separate when staging
                                      15

-------
and will clump together in the embryo incubation cup which will cause fungus



to grow on them before hatch.








3.4 Embryo Filament Removal



Recent methods development work conducted at our laboratory has provided a



simple apparatus and technique for the fast and safe removal of sticky



filaments from each embryo.  The "embryo roller" apparatus is made from a wide



mouth 270 ml glass jar (72 mm OD) with four evenly spaced 5 mm deep notches



cut into the top, and the bottom cut off and replaced with soft Nitex screen



(approximately 90 mesh) attached with silicone glue (Figure 3).   The modified



jar is then inverted with the notched mouth side down and placed in the bottom



portion of a glass petri dish (100 x 20 mm).








Embryos (200-300) from about 10-12 sponges at a time are gently picked off by



hand (index finger and thumb) and placed in a small round-bottomed glass or



stainless steel bowl containing diluent water maintained at ~28°C.   Embryos



are then gently swirled around in the bowl.  When the swirling motion slows



down, embryos can easily be siphoned up from the center of the bowl with a 50



ml pipette and squeeze bulb (pipette tip cut off and a 7 mm OD glass tube



inserted and glued to the inside of the pipette tube).   Embryos are then



carefully transferred from the pipette to the 90 mesh screen on the embryo



rolling apparatus.  Water transferred with the embryos will drain through the



screen and into the petri dish below.  Embryos are then rolled around on the



screen for about two minutes with a gentle circular motion of the index finger



while pressing on them lightly.   The motion and pressure of the finger is



almost identical to that described by Cast and Brungs (22) for removing



fathead minnow embryos from spawning substrates.  The rolling action of the



embryos on the screen causes the filaments to begin sticking to one another



which in turn causes the filaments to begin breaking off from each rolling



embryo.  Loose filaments form a sticky ball which quickly adheres to other



attached filaments and breaks them off,  This method, developed for filament
                                      16

-------
                                                       B
Figure 3. Medaka embryo roller for removal of long sticky filaments.
         Embryo roller is made from a wide mouth 270 ml glass jar (A)
         with 90 mesh Nitex screen (B) drainage notches (C) and a glass
         petri dish (D) placed underneath.

-------
removal,  has been shown to have no adverse effects on either embryo



development or hatch.







Embryos with filaments removed are then transferred for staging by simply



turning the embryo roller over and immersing embryos on the screen into a



water filled petri dish (100 x 20 mm).   Filament balls can be easily picked



out of the petri dish with tweezers and discarded.  After each group of 200-



300 embryos is staged, they should be pooled in a small round-bottomed bowl



containing 28°C diluent water.








3.5 Embryo Exposure  (test day 0-9)



The test is started by counting and distributing a minimum of 40 embryos (-24



hours old) with a large bore eye dropper to one incubation cup standing in 27-



28°C diluent water and then randomly assigning that cup to a replicate test



tank.  This process  is repeated until all replicates have one incubation cup



suspended on the moving rocker arm apparatus.








Because of the medaka embryo's tendency to attract fungus rapidly, it is



necessary to gently  flush out each group daily from the incubation cup into a



glass petri dish.  Embryos are then examined with a dissecting scope and dead



or fungused embryos  counted and discarded.  Embryos can easily be flushed out



by inverting the cup at a sharp angle over the petri dish and slowly pouring



27-28°C diluent water through the bottom of the cup screen.   The cup should



then be examined under a magnifier viewer light to make sure that all embryos



are out of the cup.  Early fungus development can be more easily observed on



the embryos if an index card is placed over the stage light of the dissecting



scope so that the embryos can be viewed over the light along the edge of the



index card.  The detracted light helps to make the early stages of fungus



development more visible.
                                      17

-------
On test day 4 the embryos will be well developed and eyed-up  (23); therefore,



on this day each group should be randomly reduced to a minimum of 20 per cup



after they are flushed out for their daily examination.  This number may vary



depending upon the number of fish needed for examination at the end of the



test.








3.6 Embryo Hatch (test day 5-9).



With an incubation temperature of 28°C,  embryos (with sticky filaments



removed) will normally begin to hatch on the fifth day of the test.  It has



been our experience that most embryos that are incubated as described in



section 1.4 will hatch on days 6 and 7 of the test.








Hatched larvae from each cup should be counted daily after they are flushed



into the petri dish.  Live fish that appear lethargic or show abnormal



swimming behavior or physical appearance should also be noted at this time,



but should not be discarded.  All live larvae are then released into the test



tank, dead larvae are discarded and unhatched embryos returned to the cups



after inspection under the dissecting scope for fungal growth.  Embryos not



hatched after ten days of exposure should be counted as dead and discarded.



It might,  however,  be necessary to extend the incubation period for a few days



if it is suspected that the toxicant is causing a delayed hatch.  The average



exposure days-to-hatch (to the nearest day) in each cup should also be



recorded.








Recent medaka experiments at our laboratory, using the above embryo handling



techniques, have demonstrated that one can expect the normal mean percent



hatch to be about 95% (minimum 80%;  maximum 100%);  and the average normal test



days to complete hatch to be about 7.5 days (minimum 7; maximum 9).  It has



also been determined upon close examination that those embryos which have not



hatched by test day 10 are either dead or in such a weakened condition that



they are unable to hatch.  Further studies using the above methods by the
                                      18

-------
authors have also shown that normal larval mortality and/or deformities at



hatch were consistently low, (mean = 0.3%, minimum  0%; maximum 2%).








3.7  Larval Exposure (mean hatch test day 7 - final test day 35).



Feeding methods for the medaka are generally the same as those used for the



fathead minnow (24).  Larvae should be fed equal quantities of live brine



shrimp nauplii (e.g., Bio-Marine, San Francisco Bay, or Jungle Brand) within



1-2 days after hatching.  Measured volumes of the nauplii in a concentrated



freshwater slurry are dispensed to each replicate with a small pipette (3-5



ml) fitted with a squeeze bulb.  Quantities fed should be increased weekly as



the fish grow larger in order to insure that adequate food is available



throughout the daylight hours.  The slurry must be mixed well between



replicate feedings  to insure uniformity of volumes fed.  Feeding schedules are



generally either twice a day about six hours apart or three times a day at



least  four hours apart.  Fish may, however, be fed double rations once a day



on weekends and holidays.   Studies completed by the authors have shown that



brine  shrimp are quite hardy and can remain alive for up to 5-6 hours in fresh



water.  Each new lot of brine shrimp eggs should be analyzed for presence of




pesticides, before  use.







Dead  fish should be counted and  removed daily  throughout the exposure period.



Sometimes larvae which  die  (especially during  the first 2 weeks -after hatch)



deteriorate  so rapidly  in  the warm water  that  they  cannot be easily observed



in  the test  tank;  therefore,  the  final count of live  fish at the end of  the




test  is used to  calculate  survival.







On  exposure  day  35  (28  days after  mean hatch day),  surviving fish  in each



replicate  are  killed by placing  them on  ice  for several minutes.   The wet



weight of  each individually blotted  fish  is  then  determined to  the nearest



milligram.   Total  length also  may be reported  if  desired.   Make  note of  any



 lethargic  or any fish  exhibiting abnormal movements,  swimming behavior  or







                                       19

-------
physical appearance.  Fish should not be fed during the last 24 hours of the



exposure period.







If fish are to be transferred to clean water for further studies such as



residue half-live studies or tumor development research, live fish can be



weighed as follows.  Individual fish are blotted on paper toweling through a



small net and then are carefully dropped from the net into a container of



water which has been tared to zero on a balance.  The balance is tared to zero



after each fish is weighed.  If desired, total lengths of live fish can be



determined photographically as described by McKim and Benoit (25).  An early



life-stage test with medaka is generally considered to be unacceptable when



the overall average survival in any control tank is less than 70%.








Recent medaka experiments at our laboratory using the above larval handling



techniques have demonstrated that one can expect the normal mean survival from



embryo thinning (test day 4) to 28 days after hatch to be about 90%  (minimum



80%; maximum 98%).  Results from these experiments also demonstrated that the



normal mean weight measured 28 days after hatch was 55 mg per fish (minimum -



47 mg; maximum  72 mg) with a standard deviation of + 7 mg.








3.8 Calculation of Results



The primary data to be analyzed from the medaka early life-stage test are



those on  (a) percent survival in each replicate (may be analyzed as  embryo



survival, larval survival and/or overall survival), (b) mean weight  of



individual survivors in  each replicate, and (c) mean chemical concentration of



the test  solution  in each treatment.  Depending on the  individual test



objectives and  results,  additional analyses may also be done to determine



toxicant  effects on embryos, hatchability, deformities, total lengths and



other chemical  factors such as residue uptake and measurements on temperature,



oxygen, pH, etc.
                                       20

-------
The variety of procedures that can be used to calculate results of a medaka



early-life stage test can be divided into two categories:   those which test



hypotheses, and those which provide point estimates (4).   The calculation



procedures and interpretation of results must be appropriate to the



experimental design of the test.  Alternative methods and points to be



considered when selecting and using procedures for calculating results of



early-life stage toxicity tests are discussed by ASTM (4).
                                      21

-------
                                  REFERENCES








1.  Couch,  J.A.  and J.C.  Harshbarger.   1985.  Effects of caracinogenic agents



    on aquatic animals:   An environmental and experimental overview.   Environ.



    Carcinogenesis.   Revs.  3(1).   63-105.








2.  Hawkins,  W.E., et.  al.   1985.   Development of aquarium fish models for



    environmental carcinogenesis:   Tumor induction in seven species.   Journal



    of Applied Toxicology.   5(4):  261-264.








3.  American Public Health Association,  American Water Works Association,  and



    Water Pollution Control Federation.   1985.  Standard methods for  the



    examination of water and wastewater.  16th ed.,  APHA,  Washington,  DC



    20005.








4.  ASTM.  1990.   Annual book of  ASTM Standards, Water and Enviromental



    Technology:   Pesticides, resource recovery,  hazardous substances  and oil



    spill responses, waste disposal,  biological effects.   Volume 11.  04:827



    designation E1241-88, ASTM Philadelphia, PA 19103-1187.








5.  Mount,  D.I.  and W.A.  Brungs.   1967.   A simplified dosing apparatus for



    fish toxicology studies.  Water Res. 1:21-29.








6.  Lemke,  A.E.,  W.A. Brungs, and B.J.  Halligan.  1978.   Manual for



    construction and operation of toxicity-testing proportional diluters.



    EPA-600/3-78-072.  National Technical Information Service,  Springfield, VA



    22161.








7.  Benoit, D.A.,  V.R.  Mattson, and D.L. Olson.   1982.  A continuous-flow



    mini-diluter system for toxicity testing.   Water Res.  16:457-464.
                                      22

-------
8.  Carton, R.R.  1980.  A simple continuous-flow toxicant delivery system.
    Water Res. 14:227-230.

9.  Benoit, D.A. and F.A. Puglisi.  1973.  A simplified flow-splitting chamber
    and siphon for proportional diluters.  Water Res. 7:1915-1916.

10.  Benoit, D.A.,  1982.  Users guide for conducting life-cycle chronic
     toxicity tests with fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas).   U.S.  EPA
     600/8-81-011,  Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, MN 55804.

11.  Drummond, R.A. and W.F.  Dawson.  1970.   An inexpensive method for
     simulating diel patterns of lighting in the laboratory.   Trans.  Am.  Fish.
     Soc.  99:434-435.

12.  Holcombe, G.W., D.A. Benoit,  D.E.  Hammermeister, E.N.  Leonard, andR.D.
     Johnson.  1991.  Acute and long-term effects of ten chemicals on the
     Japanese Medaka (Orvzias latipes).   (Draft: U.S. EPA,  Environmental
     Research Laboratory, Duluth,  MN 55804).

13.  Chadwick, G.C. and U. Kiigemagi.   1968.   Toxicity evaluation of a
     technique for  introducing dieldrin into water.   J.  Fish. Res. Board  Can.
     40:76-82.

14.  Veith, G.D.  and V.M. Comstock.   1975.   Apparatus for continuously
     saturating water with hydrophobic  organic chemicals.   J. Fish. Res.  Board
     Can.  32:1849-1851.

15.  Gingerich,  W.H., W.K. Seim,  and R.D.  Schonbrod.   1979.   An  apparatus for
     the continuous generation of  stock solutions of hydrophobic chemicals.
     Bull.  Environ.  Contam. Toxicol. 23:685-689.
                                      23

-------
16.   Phipps,  G.L.,  G.W.  Holcombe,  and J.T.  Fiandt.   1982.   Saturator system
     for generating toxic water solutions for aquatic bioassays.   Prog.  Fish-
     Cult.  44:115-116.

17.   Kahl,  M.D.,  C.L.  Russom,  D.L.  DeFoe, and D.E.  Hammermeister.   1991.
     Liquid/liquid and glass wool  column equilibration units.   (Draft:  AScI
     Corp.  and U.S. EPA, Environmental Research Laboratory,  Duluth,  MN 55804).

18.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   1979.   Methods for chemical
     analysis of water and wastes.   EPA-600/4-79-020.  National Technical
     Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161.

19.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   1980.   Manual  of analytical
     methods  for the analysis of pesticides in human and environmental
     samples.  EPA-600/8-80-038.   National Technical Information  Service,
     Springfield, VA 22161.

20.   Denny, J., R.  Spehar, K.  Mead, and S.  Yousuff.  1991.  Guidelines for the
     culture  of the medaka Oryzias latipes.  (Draft: U.S.  EPA, Environmental
     Research Laboratory, Duluth,  MN 55804).

21.   Yamamoto, Toki-0.   1975.   Medaka (killifish)  biology and strains.
     Keigaku  Publishing Company.   Tokyo, Japan.

22.   Cast,  M.H. and W.A. Brungs.   1973.   A procedure for separating eggs of
     the fathead minnow.  Prog. Fish-Cult.  35:54.

23.   Kirchen, R.V.  and W.R. West.   1976.  The Japanese Medaka: Its care and
     development.  Developmental Biology and Photography Departments,  Carolina
     Biological Supply Company, Burlington, NC 27215.
                                      24

-------
24.   Benoit, D.A., F.A. Puglisi,  and  D.L.  Olson.   1982.   A fathead minnow



     (Pimephales promelas) early  life stage  toxicity test method evaluation



     and exposure to four organic  chemicals.   Environ.  Pollut. (Series A).



     28:189-197.







25.   McKim, J.M. and D.A. Benoit.   1971.   Effect  of long-term exposures to



     copper on survival, reproduction,  and growth of brook trout (Salvelinus



     fontinalis).  J. Fish. Res.  Board can.  28:655-662.
                                       25







                                              &U.S GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1991 - 648-003/40663

-------