&EPA
           United States
           Environmental Protection
           Agency
             Environmental Monitoring and
             Support Laboratory
             Cincinnati OH 45268
EPA/600/4-84/013
April 1986
Revision
           Research and Development
USEPA Manual of
Methods for Virology

Chapter 8
Revised April  1986

-------

-------
                                                                                                     April 198$
                                                Chapter 8
             Method for Reduction of Cytotoxicity of Sample Concentrates
  This method may be used for the
reduction of cytotoxicity in the
recovery of viruses from surface
waters, waste waters, drinking waters,
ground waters, sludges, soils and
dredge spoils found toxic to
mammalian cells used for the assay of
enteroviruses. The method may also
be used for deeply colored sample
concentrates that, if left on the cell
monolayer, would result in inaccurate
plaque counts. The procedure may
result in less than usual recovery of
viruses- A titer reduction of about 30%
may be anticipated; thus, the
procedure is to be applied only if there
is a livelihood that inocula will be toxic
to cell cultures, or may be so darkly
colored as to obscure plaques.
  Use aseptic techniques and sterile
materials and apparatus only. Sterilize
all contaminated materials before
discarding them (See Chapters 2 and
3).

1.  Virus Recovery from
Samples

1.1   Process samples containing
large amounts of solids, such as
sludge, soil and dredge spoil using the
procedures described in Chapter 7.

1.2  Process water and wastewater
samples by following the VIRADEL
procedure described in Chapters 5 and
6.

2.  Storage of Sample
Concentrates

2.1   Maintain samples at 4°C if
samples can be processed within eight
hogrs.

2.2  Store samples immediately at
-70°C if processing cannot be
undertaken within eight hours.

3.   Predetermine  Cytotoxicity
of Sample Concentrate

  Pretest all samples which may be
cytotoxic.

3.1  Following the instructions in
Sections 5.3.1 thru 5,3.13, inoculate
one cell culture monolayer with each
of the sample concentrates requiring
testing.
  In the absence of experience in
identifying sample cytotoxicity, it is
advisable also to process an
uninoculated cell culture which will
serve as a control in later comparisons
to determine any reduction in
sensitivity or survival of the
mammalian cells due to the toxicity of
the samples.

3.2  Incubate cell cultures at  room
temperature (22-25°C) for 80 min.

3.3  Add overlay medium to bottle(s)
in accordance with the instructions
given in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of this
chapter.

3.4  Invert cell culture bottles and
incubate for three days in the dark at
36.5° + 1°C.

3.5  Examine monolayer for
cytotoxicity.
  Determine cytotoxicity by
macroscopic examination of the
appearance of the cell culture
monolayer. Cytotoxicity should be
suspected when the agar color is more
subdued, generally yellow to yellow- >
brown. This change in color results in
a mottled or blotchy appearance
instead of the evenly diffused color
observed in "healthy" cell monolayers.
Also viral plaques may be difficult to
distinguish from the surrounding
monolayer.

4.   Processing of Deeply
Colored Sample Concentrates

4.1   Identify  color interference on the
basis of past experience or from
results obtained in the pretesting of
sample concentrates (Section 4.2).

4.2  Predetermine color interference
from sample concentrates.
  In the absence of experience, it is
advisable to predetermine whether the
presence of a particularly prominent
color in a virus assay sample will
interfere with subsequent plaque
counting. To pretest the sample
concentrate, add a portion of
 concentrate equal to that of the
 inoculum to a single cell culture bottle.
 It is also advisable to process an
 uninoculated cell culture that will
 serve as a control in later comparisons
 with the test samples. Immediately add
 overlay medium to the bottle(s) in
 accordance with the instructions given
 in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 of this chapter.
 Invert the cell culture bottles and
 incubate for 30 min in the dark at
 36.5° ± 1°C. Examine the bottles for
 clarity of the agar overlay medium.

 4.3  Process colored sample
 concentrate that may interfere with
" virus assay by following the procedure
 used for reduction in sample toxicity
 (Section 5).


 5.   Reduction of Toxicity of
 Sample Concentrate

 5.1  Apparatus and Materials

 5.1.1  Cornwall syringe or
 equivalent with cannula or syringe
 needle.
   A pipetting device will expedite virus
 assay when large numbers of cell
 cultures must be treated.

 5.1.2  Magnetic stirrer and stir bars.

 5.1.3  Cell culture bottles.
   See Chapter 9 for the preparation of
 cell culture bottles. Chapter 9 outlines
 procedures using the Buffalo Green
 Monkey (BGM) kidney cells. These
 cells are very sensitive to many
 enteroviruses; however, cells other
 than BGM may also be used.

 5.1.4  Waterbath set at 36.5 ± 1 °C.

 5.2  Media and Reagents

 5.2.1  Sodium chloride (NaCI).

 5.2.2  GG-free newborn calf serum
 (Grand Island Biological Co., or
 equivalent).

 5.2.3  ELAH—Earle's base, with 0.5%
 lactalbumin hydrolysate and without
 NaHCOa (Kansas City Biological, cat.
 no. DM-303, or equivalent).
                                                     8-1

-------
April 1986
5.2,4  Washing solution.

(a) To a flask containing an
appropriate volume of deionized
distilled water, add sufficient NaCI to
result in a final concentration of
0.85%.
   The volume of NaCI solution
required will depend on the number of
bottles to be processed end the cell
surface area of the bottles used for
plaque assay.  For determining volume,
see Sect on 5.3.14.
(b) Mix  contents of flask on magnetic
stirrer at speed sufficient to dissolve
salt.

(c) Autoclave the salt solution at
121°Cfor15min.

(d) Cool salt solution to room
temperature.

(o) Add 2% (volume/volume) GG-free
newborn calf serum to salt solution.

(f) Mix on a magnetic stirrer at a speed
sufficient to uniformly suspend the
serum.

(g) Store the washing solution at 4°C.
  Although the washing solution may
be stored at 4°C for an extended time
period. It is advisable to prepare
solutions on a weekly basis,  thereby
lessening the possibility of microbial
contamination.

5.3  Procedure

5.3. 1   Decant growth medium from
cell culture bottles previously prepared
in accordance  with Instructions given
in Chapter 9.
   The medium is changed from one to
four hours before cultures are to be
inoculated and carefully decanted so
as not to disturb the cell monolayer.

5.3.2  Discard medium.

5.3.3  Replace discarded medium
with an  equal volume of maintenance
medium.
  For BGM cells use ELAH—Earle's
base solution without serum as
maintenance medium.
   To reduce shock to cells, warm
maintenance medium to 36.5 ±1°C
before placing on cell monolayer.
  To prevent disturbing cells with the
force of the liquid against the cell
monolayer, add maintenance medium
to the side of cell culture bottle
opposite the cell monolayer.

5.3.4  Return cell culture bottles to
36.5 ± 1°C incubator and hold at that
temperature until the bottles are to be
inoculated.

5.3.5   Identify culture bottles by
coding them with an indelible marker.

5.3.6   Decant maintenance medium
from cell culture bottles.
  Do not disturb the cell monolayer.

5.3.7   Discard medium.

5.3.8   Inoculate onto each cell
monolayer a volume of test sample
concentrate appropriate for the cell
surface area of the cell culture bottles
used.
  Inoculum volume should be no
greater than 1 mL for each 40 cm2 of
surface area.

5.3.9   Rock inoculated cell culture
bottles gently to achieve uniform
distribution of inoculum on surface of
cell monolayers.

5.3.10  Place cell culture bottles on a
leveled stationary surface at room
temperature (22-25°C) so that the
inoculum will be distributed evenly
over the cell monolayer.

5.3.7 7  Incubate inoculated cell
cultures for 80 min to permit viruses to
adsorb onto and infect cells.

5.3.72  Decant inoculum from each
cell culture bottle.

5.3.73  Discard inoculum.

5.3.14  Into each cell culture bottle,
add the volume of washing solution
appropriate for the cell surface area of
the bottles used.
  Add 0.25 mL of washing solution for
each cm2 of cell surface area. Use
washing solution as prepared in
Section 5.2.4.
  To reduce thermal shock to cells,
warm washing solution to 36.5 ±1°C
before placing on cell monolayer.
  To prevent disturbing cells with the
force of the liquid against the cell
monolayer, add washing solution to
the side of the cell culture bottle
opposite the cell monolayer. Also,
avoid touching either the cannula or
syringe needle of the pipette or the
pipetting device to the inside rim of the
cell culture bottles to avert the
possibility of transporting
contaminants to the remaining culture
bottles.

5.3.15   Rock the washing solution
gently across the cell monolayer a
minimum of two times.
  It may be necessary to gently rock
washing solution across the
monolayer more than twice if sample
is deeply colored or oily and difficult to
remove from the cell monolayer
surface.

5.3.16  Decant spent washing
solution in a manner that will not
disturb the cell monolayer.

5.3.77  Discard washing solution.

5.3.18  Proceed immediately to
Section 6.
6.   Plaque Procedure for
Titrating Viruses

6.1  Preparation

6.1.1  Apparatus and Materials

(a) Waterbath set at 36° ± 1 °C.
  Used for maintaining the
temperature of the overlay medium.
See Section  6.1.2 (a) to (h).

(b) Waterbath set at 50° ± 1 °C.
  Used for maintaining the agar
temperature. See Section 6.1.2 (i).

(c) Incubator capable of maintaining
the temperature of cell cultures at
36.5°±1°C.

6.1.2. Media and Reagents

(a) 2X Medium  199 with Earle's salts
(Grand Island Biological Co., cat. no.
400-1100, or equivalent).

(b) HEPES (Sigma Chemical Co., cat.
no. H-3375,  or equivalent).

(c) GG-free newborn calf serum
(Grand Island Biological Co., cat. no.
210-6400, or equivalent).

(d) Magnesium  chloride (MgCIa).

(e) Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCOs).

(f) Neutral red, biological stain (Fisher
Scientific Co., cat. no. N-129, or
equivalent).           ^

(g) Bacto skim milk (Difco
Laboratories, cat. no. 0032-01, or  ,
equivalent).

(h) Antibiotics—penicillin G,
dihydrostreptomycin sulfate,
amphotericin B and tetracycline
hydrochloride (Sigma Chemical Co., or
equivalent).
                                                       8-2

-------
(i) GIBCO bacteriological agar (Grand
Island Biological Co., cat. no.
M00010B, or equivalent).

6.2  Procedure

6.2.1 Mix equal portions of overlay
medium and agar.
  For BGM cells use the following or
equivalent ingredients for the final
agar overlay medium: 39.5% of a 2X
Medium 199 with Earle's salts, 2% of
a 1M solution of HEPES, 2% of GG-
free newborn calf serum, 3% of a 7.5%
solution of NaHCOs, 1% of a  1%
solution ofMgC/2, 1.5% of a 0.1%
solution of neutral red,  1% of a 1%
solution of Bacto skim milk and 50% of
a 3% suspension of GIBCO
bacteriological agar. For each 1 mL of
overlay medium prepared, supplement
with 100 units of penicillin G, 100 fig
of dihydrostreptomycin  sulfate, 1 fjg of
amphotericin B and 0.0125 mg of
tetracycline hydrochloride.

6.2.2 To each cell culture bottle, add
the volume of warm (42-46°C) agar
overlay medium appropriate for the
cell surface area of the  bottles used.
  For each cm2 of cell surface area,
add 0.5 mL of agar over/ay medium.
  To prevent disturbing cells with the
force of the liquid against the cell
monolayer, add agar overlay medium
to the side of the cell culture bottle
opposite the cell monolayer.

6.2.3 Place cell culture bottle,
monolayer side down, on a leveled
stationary surface at room
temperature (22-25°C)  so that the agar
will distribute evenly before it
solidifies.
  Agar is fully solidified within 30 to
60 min.

6.2.4 Cover cell culture bottles with a
sheet of aluminum foil, a tightly woven
cloth, or some other suitable cover to
reduce light intensity and thus,
prevent damage to the cell monolayer.

6.2.5 Invert cell culture bottles and
incubate in the dark at 36.5° + 1°C.

6.3  Counting Viral Plaques

6.3.1  Count, mark and record
plaques in cell culture bottles on days
two, three, four, six, eight and twelve
after overlaying.
   Counting procedure described is for
enteroviruses. Depending on the virus
density and virus types present in the
inoculated sample, rescheduling of
virus counts at plus or minus one day
may be deemed preferable.
  Virus titers are calculated from total
count.

6.3.2  Examine cell culture bottles on
day sixteen.
  If no new plaques appear after 16
days, discard cell culture bottles;
otherwise continue to count, mark and
record plaques every two days until no
new plaques appear between counts.

6.3.3  Calculate virus liter in plaque
forming units (PFU) for each virus-
containing sample  concentrate.
  To determine the number of PFU per
mL in water, sewage sludge, soil, or
dredge spoil sample concentrate,
multiply the number of PFU by the
reciprocal of the inoculum volume. If
the inoculum volume was diluted, also
multiply the number of PFU by the
reciprocal of the dilution made.

6.3.4  Calculate virus content of
original sample.
  To obtain virus content of the
original sample in terms of PFU per
mL, multiply the product from Section
6.3.3 by the concentration factor
which  is calculated by dividing the
volume of the original sample by the
volume of the sample concentrate. For
soil,  digested de watered sludge and
dredge spoil samples, correct for water
content and report in PFU per gram of
dry weight.


7.   Bibliography

Berg, G., D. Berman, and R. S.
  Safferman. 1982. A method for
  concentrating viruses recovered
  from sewage sludges. Can. J.
  Microbiol. 28:553-556.
Berg, G., and D. R.  Dahling. 1980.
  Method for recovering viruses from
  river water solids. Appl. Environ.
  Microbiol. 39:850-853.  .
Berman, D., G. Berg, and R. S.
  Safferman. 1 981. A method for
  recovering viruses from sludges. J.
  Virol. Methods 3:283-291.
Brashear, D. A., and R. L. Ward.  1982.
  A comparison of  methods for
  recovering indigenous viruses from
  raw wastewater sludge. Appl.
  Environ. Microbiol. 43:1413-1418.
Dahling, D. R., G. Berg, and D.
  Berman.  1974. BGM, a continuous
  cell line  more sensitive than primary
  rhesus and African green kidney
  cells for the recovery of viruses from
  water. Health Lab. Sci. 11:275-282.
Dahling, D. R., and  B. A. Wright.  1986.
  Optimization of the BGM cell line
  culture and viral  assay procedures
  for monitoring viruses in the

                8-3
                           April 1986

  environment. Appl. Environ.
  Microbiol. 51:790-812.
Farrah, S. R., P. R. Scheuerman, and
  G. Bitton. 1981. Urea-lysine method
  for recovery of enteroviruses from
  sludge. Appl.  Environ. Microbiol.
  41:455-458.
Goddard, M. R., J. Bates, and M.
  Butler. 1981. Recovery of
  indigenous enteroviruses from raw
  and digested sewage sludges. Appl.
  Environ. Microbiol. 42:1023-1028.
Hurst, C. J., and T. Goyke. 1983.
  Reduction of interfering cytotoxicity
  associated with wastewater sludge
  concentrates  assayed for indigenous
  enteric viruses. Appl. Environ.
  Microbiol. 46:133-139.
Katzenelson, E., B. Fattal, and T.
  Hostovesky. 1976. Organic
  flocculation: an efficient second-step
  concentration method for the
  detection of viruses in tap water.
  Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32:638-
  639.
Lund, E., and C.-E. Hedstrom. 1966.
  The use of an aqueous polymer
  phase system for enterovirus
  isolations from sewage. Am. J.
  Epidemiol. 84:287-291.
Nielsen, A. L., and B. Lydholm. 1 980.
  Methods for the isolation of virus
  from raw and digested wastewater
  sludge. Water Res. 14:175-178.
Sattar, S. A., and J. C. N. Westwood.
  1976. Comparison of four eluents in
  the recovery of indigenous viruses
  from raw sludge. Can. J. Microbiol.
  22:1586-1589.
Sattar, S. A., and J. C. N. Westwood.
  1 979. Recovery of viruses from field
  samples of raw, digested, and
  lagoon-dried sludges. Bull. World
  Health Org. 57:105-108.
Turk, C. A., B. E. Moore, B. P. Sagik,
  and C. A. Sorber. 1980. Recovery of
  indigenous viruses from wastewater
  sludges, using a bentonite
  concentration procedure. Appl.
  Environ. Microbiol. 40:423-425.
Ward, R. L, and C. S. Ashley. 1 976.
  Inactivation of poliovirus in digested
  sludge. Appl.  Environ. Microbiol.
  31:921-930.
 U.S. GPO:  1986-6I46-116M0605

-------

-------
                          Virology Manual Mailing List
                         for Future Methods and Updates

When you receive your manual, please complete this form, fold it in thirds
horizontally, tape it shut, and mail it to the address shown on the opposite
side of this form.

Your name will be entered into a computerized mailing list,  which will  be
used to distribute copies of future methods and other updates to the manual.
Name
Company

Address
City, State, ZIP_

-------
             FOLD HERE
Virology Manual Mailing List
Environmental Monitoring and
  Support Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 West St. Clair
Cincinnati, OH  45268
             FOLD HERE

-------