United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Health and
Environmental Assessment
Washington DC 20460
EPA/600/6-87/004
December 1986
Research and Development
Carcinogenicity
Assessment of
Chlordane and
Heptachlor/
Heptachlor  Epoxide

-------

-------
                                                EPA-600/6-87/004
                                                December 1986
         CARCINOGENICITY ASSESSMENT OF

  CHLORDANE AND HEPTACHLOR/HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
         Carcinogen Assessment Group
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
      Office of Research and Development
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Washington, DC

-------
                                   DISCLAIMER
     This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency policy and approved for publication.  Mention of trade names
or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for
use, i

-------
                                     CONTENTS



 Tables	
 Figures	!!!•!!'"	    V11
 Preface	      	' " * *    x.
 Abstract	  .      	    x!.
                                           ***•••••••••          VTT
 Authors,  Contributors,  and  Reviewers	                    *      „.;,•
                                                         **••••••    A 1 I |

 1.  CONCLUSIONS	          ljf

 2.  INTRODUCTION	       2_1

 3.  GENERAL BACKGROUND  INFORMATION	     3-1

    3.1.  CHEMICAL AND  PHYSICAL  PROPERTIES	     3_!

          3.1.1.  Identification	.....'	       3_1
          3.1.2.  Synonyms	!!!.'**"     3.3

    3.2.  USES
    3.3.  ROUTES'AND'PATTERNS OF'EXPOSURE ."  .*  .' .* .' .'  .*  .'  .*  *  .'  *  *  .*  .'     flj

4.  HAZARD IDENTIFICATION	     4_1

    4.1.  METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS 	    4_!

          4,1.1.   Absorption	    4_j

                  4.1.1.1.  Chlordane .... 	                    41
                  4.1.1.2.  Heptachlor	.....'.'.    4.3

          4.1.2.   Tissue Distribution 	    4.4

                  4.1.2.1.  Chlordane 	                       44
                  4.1.2.2.  Heptachlor	.'.*.'.'.'.'    4!?

          4.1.3.   Metabolism	    4_g

                  4.1.3.1.  Chlordane  	    4_g
                  4.1.3.2.   Heptachlor	! ! ! 1 !    4-11

          4.1.4.   Excretion  	  ...............        4-15

                  4.1.4.1.   Chlordane  	     4_15
                  4.1.4.2.   Heptachlor	.'.".'."     4-17

          4.1.5.   Species  Differences	     4_17

   4.2.   TOXIC EFFECTS	     4_20
                                     iii

-------
                         CONTENTS  (continued)
      4.2.1.   Human Studies ....................      ~
      4.2.2.   Laboratory Animal  Studies ........  ......     '•"^

              4.2.2.1.  Chlordane .................     4-24
              4.2.2.2.  Heptachlor .............. . •  •  •     *~CI
                                                                       4-??
4.3.  MUTAGENICITY ...................  ......
                                                                       4-??
      4.3.1.   Chlordane ....... » ....... .......   .7 „
      4.3.2.   Heptachlor ..... ..... • ...........     *"•"

4.4.  CARCINOGENICITY .......................     4"34
                                                                       4_?4
      4.4.1.  Animal  Studies ....................

              4.4.1.1.  Chlordane .................     J"34
              4.4.1.2.  Heptachlor .......... .......     ^"Di

      4.4.2.  Epidemiologic Studies  ................    4"63

              4.4.2.1.   Infante  et al .  (1978)  .  .  .  ........    4-63
              4.4.2.2.  Wang  and MacMahon  (1979a)  .........    4-64
              4.4.2.3.  Wang  and MacMahon  (1979b)  .........    4-°°
              4.4.2.4.  Ditraglia et  al . (1981)  ........ • •    4-/1

 4.5.  STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY  RELATIONSHIPS ........ .......    4'74
                                                                       4-74
      4.5.1.  Aldrin ........................

               4.5.1.1.   Evidence for Carcinogenicity -  Human
                         Exposure (IARC, 1982)  ...........     4~74
               4.5.1.2.   Evidence for Carcinogenicity -  Animal
                         Studies (IARC, 1982) ..........  •  •     4~76
               4.5.1.3.   Evidence for Activity  in Short-Term
                         Tests (IARC, 1982) .............     4~76

       4.5.2.   Chlorendic Acid .........  ..........     4~76

               4.5.2.1.   Evidence for Carcinogenicity -  Human
                         Exposure (NTP, 1985).  ...........     4~76
               4 5.2.2.   Evidence for Carcinogenicity -  Animal
                         Studies  (NTP, 1985) ....... .....     4~76
               4.5.2.3.   Evidence for Activity in Short-Term
                         Tests  (NTP, 1985)  .......... • • •     4-77

       4.5.3.  Dieldrin.  ......  .. ..... ..... • • ' • '     4"78

               4.5.3.1.   Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Human
                          Exposure (IARC, 1982) ...... .....    4-78

-------
                             CONTENTS   (continued)
5.
               4.5.3.2.   Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Animal
                         Studies (IARC,  1982)	    4-78
               4.5.3.3.   Evidence for  Activity in Short-Term
                         Tests  (IARC,  1982)	    4-78

      4.5.4.   Endrin	    4-79
                                                                     .  ,£
               4.5.4.1.   Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Human
                         Exposure (IARC, 1974) 	 ....    4-79
               4.5.4.2.   Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Animal
                         Studies (IARC,  1982)	    4-79
               4.5.4.3.   Evidence for  Activity in Short-Term
                         Tests  (NTP, 1985)	    4-79

      4.5.5.   Endosulfan	    4-79

               4.5.5.1.   Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Human
                         Exposure (NCI,  1978)	    4-79
               4.5.5.2.   Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Animal
                         Studies (NCI, 1978)  	    4-80
               4.5.5.3.   Evidence for  Activity in Short-Term
                        Tests (NTP, 1985)	•	    4-80

      4.5.6.   Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 	    4-80

              4.5.6.1.  Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Human           ,ji
                         Exposure (U.S. EPA, 1984b)	    4-80
              4.5.6.2.  Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Animal
                         Studies (U.S. EPA, 1984b)	    4-81
              4.5.6.3.  Evidence for Activity in Short-Term
                        Tests (U.S. EPA, 1984b)	    4-81

      4.5.7.   Isodrin .	    4-81

              4.5.7.1.  Evidence for  Carcinogenicity - Human
                        Exposure (HSDB, 1985) 	    4-81
              4.5.7.2.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Animal
                        Studies (HSDB, 1985)	    4-81
              4.5.7.3.  Evidence for Activity in Short-Term
                        Tests (HSDB, 1985). . .	    4-81

RISK ESTIMATION FROM ANIMAL DATA.  .	    5-1

5,1.  SELECTION OF DATA	    5_1

       5.1.1.  Chlordane. .	    5-1
       5.1.2.  Heptachlor/Heptachlor Epoxide	    5-6

5.2.  CHOICE OF EXTRAPOLATION MODELS	    5-6

-------
                             CONTENTS  (continued)
    5.3.  INTERSPECIES DOSE CONVERSION.	     5-17
    5.4.  ESTIMATION OF CARCINOGENIC POTENCY	     5-18

          5.4.1.  Chlordane 	     5-18
          5.4.2.  Heptachlor	     5-21
          5.4.3.  Heptachlor Epoxide	     5-21

6.  SUMMARY	 .	     6-1

    6.1.  QUALITATIVE DATA	     6-1

          6.1.1.  Human Studies	     6-1

                  6.1.1.1.  Case Reports	     6-1
                  6.1.1.2.  Epidemiologic Studies 	  ....     6-1

          6.1.2.  Animal Studies	     6-2

                  6.1.2.1.  Chlordane 	  ....     6-2
                  6.1.2.2.  Heptachlor/Heptachlor Epoxide .......     6-3

          6.1.3.  Supporting Evidence 	  ....     6-4

                  6.1.3.1.  Mutagenicity	     6-4
                  6..1.3.2.  Structural Relationship	,     6-5

    6.2.  QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS	  ....     6-5

           6.2.1.  Chlordane	     6-5
           6.2.2.  Heptachlor 	  ....     6-6
           6.2.3.  Heptachlor Epoxide 	 . 	     6-6

7.   REFERENCES	• • •     7~l

APPENDIX A:  THE MUTAGENICITY ASSESSMENT OF CHLORDANE -
             ADDENDUM TO THE REGISTRATION STANDARD	     A-l

APPENDIX B:  THE MUTAGENICITY ASSESSMENT OF HEPTACHLOR/HEPTACHLOR
             EPOXIDE  - ADDENDUM TO THE REGISTRATION STANDARD	     B-l

-------
                                     TABLES
  1.  Chemical and physical properties of chlordane,
     heptachlor, and heptachlor epoxide	    3-2

  2.  Species differences in the metabolism of
     three chemicals	    4-19

  3.  Elimination of a single oral dose of 14C-trichloroethylene
     in Osborne-Mendel  rats and B6C3F1 mice	A  'J?-21

  4.  Elimination of a single oral dose of 14c-trichloroethylene     .       :
     in Alderley Park Wistar rats and Swiss-Webster mice	    4-22

  5.  Summary of mouse dietary carcinogenicity tests for chlordane .  .  .    4-35

  6.  Summary of rat dietary carcinogenicity tests for chlordane ....    4-36

  7.  Incidence of liver lesions and tumors in CD-I mice following
     dietary administration of chlordane  .	    4-39

  8.  Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice following
     chronic dietary administration of chlordane  	    4-40

  9.  Neoplastic and/or toxic lesions of the liver in ICR mice
     fed chlordane  . .  .	  .    4.43

10.  Liver tumors and nonneoplastic lesions in Fischer 344
     rats fed chlordane	   ,4-47

11.  Liver lesions in Fischer 344 rats fed chlordane for 26
     or 52 weeks	    4-49

12.  Liver neoplasms in  male Fischer 344 rats  fed chlordane	   4-49

13.  Summary of mouse dietary carcinogenicity  tests for heptachlor
     and heptachlor epoxide	   L4'r52

14.  Summary of rat dietary carcinogenicity tests for heptachlor  and
     heptachlor epoxide  .	  .	   '4-53

15.  Incidences of liver lesions  in C3H  mice treated with heptachlor
     or heptachlor epoxide  	    4-54

16.  Incidences of hepatocellular carcinoma in C3H mice treated
     with  heptachlor or  heptachlor epoxide  	    4-54

17.  Incidence of hepatocellular  carcinoma in  B6C3F1 mice following
     chronic  dietary exposure to  heptachlor/chlordane mixture   ....    4-56
                                      vii

-------
TABLES  (continued)
18.

19.
20.

21.
22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.
28.
29.

30.

31.
32.
33.

Incidence of nodular hyperplasia in CD-I mice exposed to
heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide (25:75) mixture . 	 	
Incidence of hepatic carcinoma in CD-I mice following
chronic dietary exposure to heptachlor epoxide (25:75) 	
Incidences of neoplastic nodules in Osborne-Mendel rats
following chronic dietary exposure to heptachlor . 	
Incidence of hepatic carcinoma and neoplastic nodules in CFN rats
following chronic dietary exposure to heptachlor epoxide 	
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of chlordane from
hepatocellular carcinomas in female mice (IRDC) 	
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of chlordane from
hepatocellular carcinomas in male mice (IRDC) 	
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of chlordane from

Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of chlordane from
hepatocell ul ar carcinomas in female mice (NCI) 	
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of chlordane from
liver adenomas and carcinomas in male rats (RIASBT) 	
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor from
hepatocellular carcinomas in male mice (Davis/Reuber) 	
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor from
hepatocellular carcinomas in female mice (Davis/Reuber). .....
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor from
hepatocellular carcinomas in male mice (NCI) 	
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor from

Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor epoxide
from hepatocell ul ar carcinomas in female mice (Davis/Reuber). . . .
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor epoxide
from hepatocellular carcinomas in male mice (Davis/Reuber) ....
Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor epoxide
from hepatic carcinomas in female rats (IRDC/Reuber) 	
viii

4-58
4-58

4-60
4-62
•
5-2

5-3

5-4

5-5

5-7
5-8
5-9

5-10

5-11
5-12
5-13
5-14


-------
                              TABLES  (continued)
34.  Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor epoxide
     from hepatic carcinomas in male mice (IRDC/Reuber)  ...  	
35.  Cancer data sheet for derivation of potency of heptachlor epoxide
     from hepatic carcinomas in female mice (Witherup/Reuber)	
5-15


5-16
36.  Human potency estimates by chemical
5-19

-------
                                   FIGURES
1.  The structures of chlordane and heptachlor .  .  .  .
2.  Proposed metabolic pathways of chlordane in rats  .
3.  Proposed metabolic pathway of heptachlor in rats  .
4. '.Chemicals selected for structure-activity analysis
4-2
4-12,
4-14
4-75

-------
                                    PREFACE







     The Carcinogen Assessment Group within the Office of Health and Environ-



mental Assessment has prepared this carcinogenicity assessment at the request



of the Hazard Evaluation Division within the Office of Pesticides and Toxic



Substances.  The assessment contains a qualitative and quantitative evaluation



of the carcinogenicity data available as of November 1985.
                                      XI

-------
                                    ABSTRACT

     Evidence pertaining to the carcinogenicity of chlordane  and  heptachlor/
heptachlor epoxide is reviewed and evaluated.  This report covers studies
completed before 1985.  Case reports and epidemiologic studies  of pesticide
applicators and pesticide manufacturing,workers are reviewed, but because  of
methodologic limitations, these studies establish neither a positive nor a
negative association between cancer and chlordane or heptachlor/heptachlor
epoxide exposure.  A number of independent studies of laboratory  animals,
however, demonstrates that chlordane and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide cause
liver cancer in mice and rats.  Based on the accumulated evidence, chlordane
and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide are classified as probable human carcinogens,
Group B2 using EPA's Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment.  The carcino-
genic potency of chlordane and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide is estimated  by
fitting mathematical models to the laboratory animal data.  These estimates
indicate that chlordane and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide are rather potent
carcinogens, ranking in the second quartile of potential carcinogens evaluated
by EPA's Carcinogen Assessment Group.   A separate mutagenicity assessment  of
chlordane and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide is attached as an appendix to  this
report.  The report also includes an extensive list of  references pertinent
to the carcinogenicity of chlordane and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide.

-------
                      AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS
    The Carcinogen Assessment Group (CAG) within EPA's Office of Health and

Environmental Assessment is responsible for the preparation of this carcino-

genicity assessment.  The document was written by Dynamac Corporation, Ro'ck^i^

ville, Maryland, under EPA contract number 68-02-4131, and was reviewed by tfhe

staff of the CAG.  The CAG provided overall direction and coordination for

document production (Dharm V. Singh, Project Officer).                        .
PRINCIPAL AUTHORS

Finis L. Cavender

Brion T. Cook

Norbert P,. Page

Dynamac Corporation
Rockville, MD
CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS

Vincent James Cogliano
Carcinogen Assessment Group
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC

Aparna M. Koppikar
Carcinogen Assessment Group
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC

D.E.B. Potter
Dynamac Corporation
Rockville, MD

Dharm V.  Singh
Carcinogen Assessment Group
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC

                                      xiii

-------
Lawrence R. Valcovic
Reproductive Effects Assessment Group
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC
REVIEWERS

   ;_The following individuals reviewed earlier drafts of this document and

provided valuable comments:

Michael A. Berry
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC

Jerry N. Blancato
Exposure Assessment Group
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC

James W. Holder
Carcinogen Assessment Group
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC

W. Bruce Peirano
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, OH

Dharm V. Singh
Carcinogen Assessment Group
Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC
                                       xiv

-------
                                1.  CONCLUSIONS
     Based on the accumulated evidence, chlordane is a probable  human  carcino-
gen, classified in Group B2 under the EPA's Guidelines for Carcinogen  Risk
Assessment.  Animal  studies provide sufficient evidence for carcinogenic-ityiv
chlordane increased the incidence of liver carcinomas in C57B1/6N,  CD-I,--'and
B6C3F1 mice; liver adenomas and hemangiomas in ICR mice; and liver  adenomas-In
Fischer 344 rats.  Epidemic!ogic studies provide inadequate evidence due to
methodology and data limitations.
     According to the criteria in the guidelines, the above evidence puts
chlordane in Group B2.  However, the guidelines allow for the possibility of
downgrading the classification from Group B2 to Group C when the only  tumor
response is that of mouse liver tumors in strains with high background rates,
or when warranted by a number of other factors.  In the case of  chlordane  '"r
                                                                          ./'i
these conditions do not apply, since chlordane caused tumors in  C57B1/6N mice--
which do not have a high background rate—and caused tumors in rats as wellv-
Other pertinent evidence includes highly significant tumor responses,  up to-77
percent increased incidence over controls, increased incidence in both males
and females, increased incidence at medium and high doses, a dose-related in-
crease in the proportion of malignant tumors, and induction of tumors  by struc-
turally related chemicals.   In light of these factors, downgrading is  clearly
not warranted, and chlordane remains in Group B2.
     For chlordane,  the carcinogenic potency, averaging estimates from the most
sensitive species tested, is 1.3 per mg/kg/day.  The potency using the most
sensitive sex and strain is 4.7 per mg/kg/day.  These are plausible upper
bounds for the increased cancer risk from chlordane, meaning that the  true risk
is not likely to exceed these estimates and may be lower.   The molecular potency
                                      1-1

-------
index for chlordane is 5.2 x 102 per mmol/kg/day.   This  places  chlordane in the
second (upper middle)  quartile of suspect carcinogens  ranked  by the Carcinogen
Assessment Group (CAG).
     Heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide is a probable human carcinogen, classified
in Group B2 under the EPA's Guidelines for Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.  Animal
studies provide sufficient evidence for carcinogenicity:  heptachlor/heptachlor
epoxide increased the incidence of liver carcinomas in C3H, CD-I, and B6C3F1
mice and in CFN rats.  Epidemiologic studies provide inadequate evidence due
to methodology and data limitations.
     The guidelines consider this evidence sufficient  for Group B2, but they
allow downgrading from Group B2 to Group C when  the only  tumor  response is
that of mouse liver tumors in strains with high  background  rates, or when
warranted by a number of other factors.  The evidence, however, shows highly
significant tunor responses, increased incidence in both  males  and females,
increased incidence at medium and high doses, and  induction of  tumors by struc-
turally related chemicals.  In light of these factors, downgrading is clearly
not warranted, and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide remains  in Group B2.
     For heptachlor, the carcinogenic potency, averaging  estimates from the
most sensitive species tested, is 4.5 per mg/kg/day.  The potency using the
most sensitive sex and strain is 14.9 per mg/kg/day.  These are plausible upper
bounds for the increased cancer risk from heptachlor,  meaning that the true
risk is not likely to exceed these estimates and may be  lower.  The molecular
potency index for heptachlor is 1.7 x 103 per mmol/kg/day.  This places hepta-
chlor in the second quartile of suspect carcinogens ranked  by the CAG.
     For heptachlor epoxide, the carcinogenic potency, averaging estimates from
the most sensitive species tested, is 9.1 per mg/kg/day.  The potency using the
                                                        *•!,•
most sensitive sex and strain is 36.2 per mg/kg/day.  These are plausible upper

                                      1-2

-------
bounds for the increased cancer risk  from  heptachlor  epoxide, meaning that the
true risk is not likely to  exceed  these  estimates  and may be lower.  The molec-
ular potency index for heptachlor  epoxide  is  3.5 x 103 per mmol/kg/day.  This
places heptachlor epoxide in  the most potent  quartile of suspect carcinogens
ranked by the CAG.
                                      1-3

-------

-------
                              2.   INTRODUCTION

      In preparing this assessment, the CAG has considered the Drinking Water
Criteria Document for Heptachlor, Heptachlor Epoxide,  and Chlordane recently
drafted by the Environmental  Criteria and Assessment Office (U.S.  EPA,  1985a).
Much of the prior material  presented in the 1977 Risk  Assessment of Chlordane
and Heptachlor, prepared by the CAG (U.S. EPA, 1977) has also been incor-
porated into this current assessment.  As guidance in  preparing this assess-
ment, the EPA's Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (U.S. EPA, 1986)
were followed.
                                     2-1

-------

-------
                         3.   GENERAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION
        Chlordane  and  heptachlor  are  structurally  related  chlorinated  hydrocarbon
  insecticides  that  have  been  and/or  are  being  used  to  control termites  and  pests
  on  field crops.  They are  synthesized by  the  condensation  of two  cyclopenta-
  diene  rings  (hexachlorocyclopentadiene  and  cyclopentadiene) to  form  chlordane.
  In  the second step (chlorination),  the  reaction  conditions can  be adjusted to
  give either  technical chlordane or  technical  heptachlor.
      Technical  grade chlordane  is a light-yellow-colored  liquid consisting of
  approximately equal  parts  cis-  and  trans-isomers,  along.with chlordene isomers,
  heptachlor,  and  their impurities.   Technical  grade heptachlor  is  a white  crys-
  talline solid containing approximately  73 percent  heptachlor and  22  percent
  transchlordane.   Heptachlor  epoxide is  a  degradation  product of heptachlor and
  has an estimated vapor  pressure of  3 x  10~4 mmHg at 25°C.
  3.1.  CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL  PROPERTIES
      Those properties most relevant to  carcinogenesis and  human exposure  are
  listed in Table  1.
  3.1.1.  Identification
             Chlordane
Molecular
  Formula:
Molecular
  Weight:
CAS No.:
                        Heptachlor
                          Cl
                      Heptachlor Epoxide
 409.76
57-74-9
                                       Cl   Cl H
 C10H5C17

 373.32
76-44-8
 C10H5C170

 389.32
1024-57-3
                                        3-1

-------






LU
Q

X
g
LU


3
rn
o

t—
0.
LU
rc
o
2=
o;
0

rn

^r"
»—
D.
LU
ar

n
iii
^y*
-

o.

o
z


_j

o
t— 4
LU
""I™
Ml1—!
O

•
t— 1

LU

CO

O1
	
0
o
LO
rH
IO
r-H
1
0

r-H


CO
3T
PS
pE

LO

r-H
1
t-H

4-5


O
O
LO
^-
t-H

LO
CO
t-H














c
^

CM

[ *
03

O
O
LO
r*.
t-H










4-3
c:
•r—
O
CL

CO
C
•r—
r-«t
•l«
o
CO










{















03
1








o
o
LO
CM

t^
03

O>
rc

£E
^.
1
0
r-H





t^
O)
J^
03
^
C
•r—

_J
Ol
E















o
o
LO

















LO CM
























O
O
CO




f 	 „
£_
^-*. CO
c- E
Q) 0
E v>
O •!-
in i
•r— in
1 C
in 03
•r- t-
O 4-5
•- -*~ -

CJ 0
O 0
t~- LO
O 0
t-H t-H
1 1
IO .3-
O 0
rH i-H










[ %
C
•i —
o
CL

01
C
•r—
40
r—
cu
s:




*-*
£
tl
3
O.

c-
3
O
c:
VX
CI
3


CT>
LO

t-H
|
p^.
LO
•
r-H










CJ
O
LO
CM

,| ^
03

co
IO
•
r-H
|
cn
LO

r- 1







>^
i ^
•r—
>
03
C_
cn

o
•r—
1-
•r—
O
CO
CL
co
X

CO




o
o
LO
CM

[ ^
03

Ol
~r*
^
^

^j-
1
O
rH

X

CO






CJ
o
LO
CM

1 ^
03

0)
— C
gn
E

LO
1
O
t-H

X

t-H









CO
£_
3
in
CO
c_
CL

£_
o
CL
03

co
•
0



1 ^
03

t-
O)

03
s

£=
•r—

_J
^*^,
o>
E

vo
LO
O
•
o




c_

03


C
•r—

CJ
O
LO
CM

1 ^
03

_I

C71
^L

CTt












..^
1 ^
•r"
r—-
•pi-
e~\
3

O
CO

1 ^
03




>>
c:
03
E

c—
•r—



I-M
O3
0
•r—
f—
g—
O
a>


c_
0
«t-


































tn
4->
c:
CO
>
r—
O
in

o
•r—
C
03
a>
t-
o



_£_
4-i
•r- 0
3 T-
t_ 40 W>
O CO 03 4->

0} CM O 03 i—
4-> ••  O
O3 LO -i— T3  O3
•--^ £_ T3 03 O
CO 4-5 C— r- O
3. .. 0 Q. £_
W r— T- -O

LO o u "re j=
























•o
c a>
03 rc
co g
H-^.

CL CDO
E to
i «3- r~-
i • a~i
CM • TD
vo LO c .
O rH 03
•=*• II
• HO
LO _J 0
1 ~-, E LO
LO o> CLCM
to E CL
• 4^
CM rH rH 03




T3
c: tm
nsco rc
E €
E--. E
a. a>
CL E 0
VO
r-l LO 1 —
1 • CO
1 LO • -O
to LO c
•* rH 03
•* II
• II CJ
LO _J O
1 ~-~ E LO
r^ a» CLCM
CO E Q.
• 4-^
CO i-H t-H 03






-o
" — ^ d CO
<_ osco rc
a> •— - E E
E t- E •*>. E
O O> CL O>
in •« E CL E 0
•r- .G o x: to
1 4-> (/) 4-* r^- tO 1^-.
V> CL-I— Q. • l~~.
C O) 1 O) CT> • -O
03 "O tn "O LO ID C
t- T- r- 1 03
4-» E 0 E II
•~^ *~* • II 0
i— 1 rH 	 10
£_ t_ ---. E LO
J= E -C E CM CO CLCM
O O CO E CL
CO t- CO t- • 4-5
CM 1- CO 
O3 i — O CO C- C
> O3 E— O O3 O
LU .C M- _l CL O





























































•
03
LO
CO
O^
I—I

A
^£
a.
LU

CO
ro
E
o
• c_
"O M-
O)
T3 -O
•I™ QJ
> 4J
o a.
t_ 03
°- 3
4^
O
C ••
LU
03 O
4-5 a;
03 rr>
a o
03 CO
3-2

-------
3.1.2.  Synonyms
     Each chemical  has a number of synonyms and trade names (U.S. EPA, 1985a).
       1)   Chlordane
            l,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachlor2,3,3a,4,7,7a^hexahydro-4,7-methano
            -IH-indene
            l,2>4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro-4J7-methano-3a,4,7,7a-tetra-hydroindane
            l,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4s7-methanindan
            Dichlorodene                            Chi or Kil
            Octachlor                               Corodane
            Topiclor  20                             Ortho-Klor
            Velsicol  1068                           Synklor
            Dpwchlor                                 Belt
            Kypchlor                                 Niran
       2)    Heptachlor
            l,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachlor-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7-methanoindene
            3-chloro-chlordene
            3,4,5,6,7,8,8a-heptachlorodicyclopentadiene
            Heptagran                            Velsicol  104
            Rhodiachlor                          E3314
            Drinox                               Heptamul
       3)    Heptachlor epoxide
            2,3,4,5,6,7,7-heptachloro-la,lb,5,5a56,6a-hexahydro-2,5-
            methano-2H-indene(l,2-b)oxirene
            l,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-2,3-epoxy-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-
            4,7-methanoindan
            Epoxyheptachlor
            Velsicol 53-CS-17
            ENT 25
            584
                                     3-3

-------
3.2.  USES
     Chlordane and heptachlor, both contact insecticides,  have generally  had
the same uses in the past, primarily in a wide variety of  soil applications
(U.S. EPA, 1977; U.S. EPA, 1985a, b).   The main uses for  chlordane have  been
in the control of cutworms, ants, root weevils, rose beetles, grasshoppers,
grubs, and termites.  It had been used mainly in agriculture (25 percent),  home
use such as turf treatment, garden, and household use (25  percent), and soil
treatment around buildings (50 percent).  Technical  grade  chlordane is a  varia-
ble mixture of chemicals that typically consists of 24 percent trans-chlordane,
21.5 percent chlordene isomers, 19 percent cis-chlordane,  10 percent heptachlor,
7 percent nonachlor, and 18.5 percent other miscellaneous  impurities.
     Heptachlor has some fumigant action and has been used primarily to con-
trol termites and insects that attack field crops.  Heptachlor has been used
in agriculture  (about 70 percent) and in termite control (about 28 percent).
Technical heptachlor consists of approximately 73 percent heptachlor, 22 per-
cent trans-chlordane, and 5 percent nonachlor.  Heptachlor epoxide is not
commercially  available in the United States, but it is a degradation product
of heptachlor (U.S. EPA, 1985a, b).
3.3.  ROUTES  AND  PATTERNS OF  EXPOSURE
     Both chlordane and heptachlor are chemically stable and  persist in the
soil, although  heptachlor is  slightly less  persistent than chlordane in soils.
Heptachlor is oxidized in soil to heptachlor epoxide, which then is more
persistent than chlordane  (U.S.  EPA, 1977).  Residues of chlordane have been
detected  for  up to  10 years after a  single  application.
     Because  of their long history of use  in a wide  variety of applications,
residues  of chlordane, heptachlor, their oxidation products  (oxychlordane and
heptachlor epoxide), and  impurities  (mainly nonachlor) are found in  foods,
                                       3-4

-------
 soils,  sediments, wildlife, and  in air near application sites.
      Heptachlor  in  soils, water, and plants is metabolized to heptachlor epox-
 ide and to  1-hydroxychlordene epoxide; chlordane and nonachlor are apparently
 not metabolized  in  these systems.  In animals, heptachlor is metabolized to
 heptachlor  epoxide, which is well retained in lipid tissue.  Chlordane in
 animals is  metabolized to oxychlordane, which is also stored with no further
 metabolism.  Nonachlor is apparently not metabolized and is accumulated by
 animals.
      Food residues  have been measured in the FDA Total Diet Program as well
 as in the USDA and  FDA Food Surveillance Program.  The latter programs are
 designed to sample  foods shipped in interstate commerce.  In the total diet
 study, chlordane and oxychlordane were found only at the lower limit of detec-
 tion  (0.003 ppm in the total diet), if at all, but in the surveillance survey
 residues with a somewhat higher detection limit were found in root vegetables,
 meat, and fish in 7 to 17 percent of the samples.  Heptachlor was rarely detec-
 ted, and heptachlor epoxide was found sporadically in dairy products, meat,
 fish, and poultry at the lower detection limit of 0.003 ppm in the total  diet
 survey.  However, in the Food Surveillance Program, heptachlor epoxide residues
 greater than 0.03 ppm were found in 19 percent of red meat samples, 17 percent
 of poultry, and 14 percent of dairy products.   Based on these data, it is
 estimated that human consumption of heptachlor epoxide is  on the order of
 1.0 Mg/day for adults in marketed foods  of widespread distribution in the
 United States.  Oxychlordane,  heptachlor,  chlordane, and nonachlor appear
 sporadically in foods.   Chlordane and nonachlor are also found in freshwater
fish.  Consumption by sport  fishermen may  be as high as 2.2 yg/day.
     During 1970 and 1972, two national  ambient air monitoring surveys  sampled
pesticides at a number  of sites  across the United States.   Heptachlor,  chlor-
                                      3-5

-------
dane, heptachlor epoxide, and oxychlordane (in order of decreasing  frequency)
were detected.  Chlordane and heptachlor were detected in a study of suburban
areas in 1976.  The average air concentration of heptachlor in the  community
with the highest reading was 6.3 ng/m3.  Heptachlor, and to a lesser extent
chlordane and heptachlor epoxide, are widespread in ambient air, with typical
mean concentrations on the order of 0.5 ng/m3.  The amounts of chlordane and
heptachlor in air above treated fields were reported to be as high as 16 ng/m3,
even 3 weeks after treatment.  Chlordane concentrations as high as 72 ppm have
been found in house dust for up to 4 years after fumigation treatment.
     The data available for residues in human tissue are more extensive and
reliable than the data for food residues.  The principal source of this data
has  been the National Human Monitoring Program conducted between 1970 and 1974
(U.S. EPA, 1977).  Heptachlor epoxide was found in  97 percent of approximately
7,000 samples of human tissue tested.  Similarly, oxychlordane was found in
approximately 97 percent of  5,000  samples, and about  98  percent of 755 samples
showed  residues of trans-nonachlor.  The  geometric  mean  levels of heptachlor,
oxychlordane, and nonachlor  are about  0.085,  0.11,  and 0.11  ppm, respectively.
     There is some evidence  that chlordane may  undergo sensitized photolysis
in  aquatic media.  The direct  photolysis  of  chlordane  in ambient aquatic media
without a sensitizer; oxidation  processes involving singlet  oxygen  and  peroxy/
radical; hydrolysis;  and biodegradation  in ambient  aquatic media are not likely
to  be  significant  fate-determining processes.  The  three processes  that  are
likely to determine  the  fate of  this compound in  aquatic media  are  evaporation,
sorption, and bioaccumulation.   The evaporative half-life  of this compound from
1 m depth of water was  estimated to be 28 to 33 hours.   Thus, although  the evap-
oration from aquatic media may not be rapid, it could be significant in  the ab-
 sence of any other faster processes.  Chlordane is expected  to  be  significantly
                                       3-6

-------
 sorbed from the aquatic  phase  to  suspended  particles  and  sediment, which may
..play a significant  role  in  determining  its  aquatic  fate.                   ;
      Heptachlor may undergo significant  photolysis  in ambient aquatic media,
 since laboratory studies have  demonstrated  photolytic decomposition  in  1 week
 and complete decomposition  in  2 weeks.   The singlet oxygen  reaction  with hep-
 tachlor in  aquatic  media may be significant, with the half-life of heptachlor
 for this reaction estimated to be about  1 day.  The hydrolysis of heptachlor in
 aquatic media is also  an important  process, with an estimated hydrolytic half-
 life in the range of 1 to 3 days.   The volatilization half-life of heptachlor
 from aquatic media  is  estimated to  be 2  to  10 days  from pond, river, and lake
 water.  Although most  estimates indicate that the evaporative half-life of
 heptachlor  in aquatic  media appears to be longer than that  of chlordane (2 to
 10  days vs. 1 to 2  days), Huang (1970) reported that the  evaporation rate of
 heptachlor  from aquatic  media  is  faster  than for chlordane.  Heptachlor may be
 significantly sorbed onto suspended particles and sediments present  in aquatic
 media, which may play  a  significant role in determining the fate of  heptachlor
 in  aquatic  media.   The biodegradation rate  of heptachlor  in aquatic media is
 slower than the rate of  hydrolysis.
      The fate of heptachlor epoxide in aquatic media has  not been comprehen-
 sively studied.  Photolysis, oxidation,  or  hydrolysis are not expected to be
 significant fate-determining processes for  heptachlor epoxide in aquatic media.
 Biodegradation also does not appear to be a significant process.  The two pro-
 cesses that are likely to determine the  fate of heptachlor epoxide in aquatic
 media are volatilization and sorption.   The rate of volatilization of hepta-,,
 chlor epoxide from  aquatic  media  is much slower than for  heptachlor.  However,
 it  is difficult to  make  a reasonable estimate of the evaporative half-life for
 this compound because  of the lack of appropriate data.  The sorption of this
                                      3-7

-------
compound on suspended particulate matter or sediment may be a moderately  signi-
ficant process (U.S. EPA, 1985a).
     In summary, exposure to chlordane and heptachlor can occur to a variety
of human populations through direct use of the materials or indirectly through
their entry into environmental  pathways.  Potentially exposed populations con-
sist of workers in manufacturing and formulating plants; field and home appli-
cators of the pesticides; and the general population through atmospheric,
aquatic, or food residues.
                                       3-8

-------
                           4.  HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
4.1.  METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS
     Chlordane and heptachlor are related bicyclic chlorinated hydrocarbons.
In fact, heptachlor is a minor metabolite of chlordane.  Chlordane has two
isomers, cis and trans, and the chemical structures of chlordane and heptacblor
are given in Figure 1.  As there are virtually no data on the metabolism and
pharmacokinetics of chlordane and heptachlor in humans, the review in this..sec-
tion consists of animal studies only.
4.1.1.  Absorption
4.1.1.1.  Chlordane—Quantitative data on the absorption of chlordane from the
gastrointestinal tract of laboratory animals were not available.  However, the
systemic toxicity of the insecticide to laboratory animals following oral,
dermal, and inhalation exposure indicates that some absorption does take place.
That chlordane is absorbed can also be inferred from excretion data.  Chlordane
consists of a mixture of components, including the cis- and trans-isomers.  A
high purity (98+ percent) formulation of the insecticide, designated HCS-3260,
contains cis- and trans-chlordane in a 3:1 ratio.  Sprague-Dawley rats (one of
each sex) received a single dose of 0.05, 0.2, or 1.0 mg 14C-HCS-3260/kg body
weight (bw) by gavage, or a single oral dose of each 14C-labeled isomer at 0.2
mg/kg bw (Barnett and Dorough, 1974).  Elimination of radioactivity in the
urine over 7 days was 6 percent for females and 2 percent for males following
14C-HCS-3260 treatment.  In other studies, following treatment with cis- and
trans-chlordane-14C, female rats eliminated 8.5 and 5 percent of the admini-
stered radioactivity,  respectively.   These results indicate that at least 2
to 8.5 percent of the administered chlordane dose was absorbed by the gastro-
intestinal  tract of rats.   Based upon a study in  which a male rabbit was given

                                       4-1

-------
Cl
                      Cl
      cis-chlordane
trans-chlordane
         Figure  1.  The structures of chlordane and heptachlor,
                               4-2

-------
 14C-HCS-3260 in a dietary concentration of 25 ppm  (25 mg/kg diet) for 2 days,
 33  percent of the radioactivity was excreted in the urine and 21 percent in
 the feces 24 hours after dosing (Barnett and Dorough, 1974).  Thus, it would
 appear that at least 33 percent of the chlordane was absorbed by the rabbit as
 compared with only 2 to 8.5 percent for the rat after oral administration.
     Pulmonary absorption of an unspecified amount of 14C-chlordane (11,500
 dpm/yg) in 20 pL ethanol administered as an aerosol intratracheally to female
 Sprague-Dawley rats was measured by Nye and Dorough (1976).  No intact 14C-
 chlordane was detected in exhaled air.  A peak blood concentration of radio-
 activity of approximately 4 percent of the applied dose was reached in <5 min-
 utes.
     Ambrose et al. (1953b) reported in an abstract that dermal  application of
 50 mg chlordane/kg bw was more toxic to rats when the chemical  was applied in
 cottonseed oil rather than in ethyl alcohol, indicating greater absorption with
 the lipophilic vehicle.                                                   *2.-
 4.1.1.2.  Heptachlor—Limited information was found on the absorption of hep-ta-
 chlor following ingestion by animals.   However, the systemic toxicity of hepta-
 chlor following oral, dermal, or inhalation exposure is an indication of the
 absorption of the insecticide.  The U.S. EPA (1980b) reviewed an abstract of a
 Soviet study (Mizyukova and Kurchatov, 1970)  and reported that  heptachlor ad-
ministered intragastrically in a single oral  dose of 120 mg/kg  bw to rats was
 detected in blood within 0.5 to 1  hour of administration.
     The absorption of heptachlor  following inhalation exposure  also has not
 been well  studied.  From July 1, 1972, to October 4, 1972, Arthur et al. (1975)
placed 10 rabbits of each sex in open-air cages  so that  they were exposed to
the ambient air of Stoneville, MS,  an  area where insecticides had been  heavily
used.  Control  groups of male and  female rabbits (10 each) were  housed  in a
                                       4-3

-------
  room  at Mississippi  State  University, a low pesticide use area.  The average
"  level  of  heptachlor  epoxide  (heptachlor was either  not measured or not detec-
  ted)  in Stoneville air  was 1.86  ng/m3; the air  at Mississippi State was not
  sampled.   Heptachlor epoxide residue  levels in  adipose tissue of the test
  rabbits averaged 0.039  ppm,  as compared with  0.016  ppm in .controls (p < 0.001).
  The average respiratory intake of heptachlor  epoxide was calculated as 0.002 yg/
  day for rabbits in the  Stoneville area.
  4.1.2. Tissue Distribution
  4.1.2.1.   Chlordane—The tissue  distribution  of 14C-HCS-3260, cis- or trans-
  chlordane-14C, and the  metabolite oxychlordane  in male and  female  rats following
  treatment with single oral doses was  compared by Barnett and Dorough  (1974).
  At 1 day  following doses of 0.05 to 2.0 mg/kg bw of the  respective compounds,
  the concentrations of radioactive equivalents in brain,  muscle,  liver, and
  kidney were generally low (0.00  to 0.08 ppm), while the  concentrations of
  radioactivity in fat were somewhat higher (the average  for  all  treatments was
  approximately 0.47 ppm).  Male and female rats treated with 0.1 mg 14C-HC-3260/
  kg bw had higher tissue residue levels of radioactive equivalents  in  liver
  (0.50 ppm), kidney  (0.26  ppm), and fat (3.71 ppm for females, 2.58 ppm for
  males).   In general, female rats accumulated greater concentrations  of radio-
  activity  in fat than male rats after treatment with any  preparation.   At 7 days
  after dosing with 1.0 mg  14CrHCS-3260/kg bw, radioactivity in all  tissues
  declined;  radioactivity in  fat declined to 2.0 ppm for females and 1.19  ppm for
  males.   Slightly more  radioactivity was present in rat tissues following oral
  doses of trans- as  compared with cis-chlordane-l^C.
        When 14C-HCS-3260 was  administered to male rats in the diet at 5 ppm (5
  mg/kg diet) for 56  days,  the tissue distribution of radioactive equivalents
  was  0.42, 0.91, 0.55,  0.68, and  14.73 ppm for  muscle, brain, kidney, liver,
                                        4-4

-------
 and  fat,  respectively  (Barnett  and  Dorough,  1974).   After  discontinuing treat-
 ment for  28  and  56  days,  the  concentration of  radioactivity  in  fat  declined to
 3.67 and  2.49  ppm,  respectively.  Radioactivity was  still  detected  in other
 tissues 56 days  after  treatment was terminated.  Greater accumulation of  radio-
 activity  in  all  tissues resulting from the absorption of transrather than from
 cis-chlordane-14C occurred in female  rats treated with 25  ppm (25 mg/kg diet).
 Analysis  of  the  nature of the radioactivity  revealed that  approximately 30 to
 60 percent of  the radiocarbon was associated with oxychlordane.
      Ambrose et  al.  (1953a) found that the peri renal fat of male rats contained
 43,  41, and  81 ppm  of  chlordane residues following feeding, for  5, 148, and 407
 days, respectively, of a  diet containing 320 ppm (320 mg/kg diet).  The fat of
 female rats  contained  approximately twice the  values for males.
      Residues of parent isomers and oxychlordane in adipose tissue from male
 and  female Holtzmann rats maintained on diets  containing either 50 to 220 ppm
 (50  to 200 mg/kg diet) cis- or  trans-chlordane, 100 ppm (100 mg/kg diet) of
 fixed ratios of the isomers from 9:1 trans:cis to 1:9, or  50 ppm (50 mg/kg
 diet) technical chlordane for 15 days were determined by Street and Blau
 (1972).  Adipose tissue of female rats fed trans-chlordane at 50, 100, and 200
mg/kg diet contained approximately 6, 10, and  23 pg/g lipid of transchlordane,
 respectively.  Much greater concentrations of oxychlordane than trans-chlordane
were  stored in adipose tissue by females (approximately 104,  202, and 471  pg/g
 lipid) and males (approximately 5, 15, and 22 ug/g lipid)  after being fed
trans-chlordane.  The feeding of cis-chlordane likewise resulted in greater fat
storage of the metabolite than of the parent  isomer in both male and female
rats; however, the ratio oxychlordane:isomer  was reduced.   Female rats fed 50
ppm technical grade chlordane (50 mg/kg diet) stored approximately  7 times more
oxychlordane than the parent compound in adipose tissue.   The results of feed-
                                      4-5

-------
ing ratios of cis- and trans-chlordane indicated that oxychlordane accumulation
was additive for each isomer.
     Polen et al. (1971) also detected oxychlordane in the fat depots of rats,
dogs, and pigs maintained on diets containing individual  isomers or technical
chlordane.  Rats received dietary concentrations of cis-, trans-, or technical
grade chlordane at 0 to 150 ppm (0 to 150 mg/kg diet) for 1 year; dogs received
technical grade chlordane at 3 or 30 ppm (3 or 30 mg/kg diet) for 2 years; and
pigs were fed diets containing the cis- or trans-isomer at 300 ppm (300 mg/kg
diet) for 90 days.  The respective levels of oxychlordane in the fat of these
species were 0.2 to 150, 3 to 24, and 36 to 90 ppm, respectively.
     Rabbits received trans-chlordane-14C daily per os in doses of 14.3 mg/
rabbit/day for  10 weeks (Poonawalla and Korte, 1971).  Two weeks after treat-
ment was discontinued,  low levels of  radioactivity were detected in kidney
(0.05 percent of administered dose),  liver  (0.52 percent), heart (0.09 per-
cent),  lung  (0.04 percent),  spleen  (0.03 percent), testes  (0.03  percent), and
brain (0.04  percent)  tissue.  Higher  levels were found in adipose tissue  (2.59
percent in abdominal  fat, 1.53  percent in subcutaneous fat)  and  in muscle (5.68
percent).  Barnett and  Dorough  (1974) found that the  tissues  of  a rabbit  fed
14C-HCS-3260 (25 mg/kg  diet  for 2 days) contained  14C-oxychlordane and  14C-
dichlorochlordene.                        .,,.._.
     The distribution of  radioactivity in the  tissues of  rabbits administered
cis- or trans-chlordane-14C  orally  in four  doses,  one capsule given  every 4 days
containing  100  mg per capsule,  were as follows:  fat  > kidney >  muscle  >  liver
> brain (cis-); kidney  >  fat >  liver > muscle  >  brain (trans-)  (Balba and Saha,
1978).   The  majority  of the  radioactivity in the tissues  was associated with
oxychlordane,  regardless  of  which isomer was  administered.
     The mobilization of  chlordane  or its metabolites from adipose  tissue of
                                       4-6

-------
rats after food deprivation was studied by Ingle (1952).  Chlordane was removed
from the diet after 80-week maintenance of 16 rats on a diet containing chlor-
dane at 150 ppm (150 mg/kg diet).  At weekly intervals, two male and two female
rats were fasted for 48 hours and observed for symptoms of toxicity.  After 4
weeks, symptoms such as tremors and hyperactivity were no longer observed.
     The distribution of radioactivity (expressed as percent of administered
radioactivity/tissue) in selected tissues of rats following the previously
described intratracheal administration of 14C-chlordane (Nye and Dorough,
1976) was 23.9 percent in lung, 19.6 percent in liver, 0.3 percent in kidney,
and 0.1 percent in the bladder and its contents.
4.1.2.2.  Heptachlor—An abstract of a Soviet study (Mizyukova and Kurchatov,
1970) reported that following a single intragastric dose of 120 mg/rat hepta-
chlor to female rats, heptachlor was detected in blood, liver, kidney, and
adipose tissue within 1 hour.  After 4 hours, heptachlor epoxide,  a metabolite
of heptachlor, was detected in blood, liver, and fat and persisted in the
adipose tissue for 3-6 months.
     Radomski  and Davidow (1953) studied the tissue distribution of heptachlbr
epoxide in rats and dogs following oral  administration of heptachlor.  Nine
rats of either sex received dietary concentrations  of heptachlor at 30 to 35
ppm (30 to 35 mg/kg diet) for 2 months.   Heptachlor epoxide levels in the fat
of six female rats averaged 384 pg/g tissue, whereas fat in male rats con-
tained an average of only 43 pg/g tissue.  Much lower levels of .heptachlor
epoxide were detected in liver (0.4 to 33 pg/g), kidney (0 to 2l'pg/g),  and
muscle (0 to 27 pg/g)  tissue.  None was  detected in brain  tissue.   A similar
pattern of distribution was observed in  three female dogs  that received  1 mg
heptachlor/kg bw in capsules daily for 12 to 18 months.   Fat contained an aver-
age heptachlor epoxide concentration of  636 pg/g; liver, 36 pg/g;  kidney,
                                      4-7

-------
7.5 yg/g; and muscle, 13 yg/g.  Again, no heptachlor epoxide was  detected
in the brain.  Small  amounts of unchanged heptachlor were detected in  the  fat
of dogs when higher levels of the insecticide were administered.   Administra-
tion of 1 mg heptachlor/kg bw to four dogs resulted in no detectable heptachlor
in fat after 26 weeks, while three of eight dogs, surviving 6 to  18 weeks, dosed
with 3 mg/kg bw daily had <1 yg heptachlor/g fat tissue.  A daily dose of  5 mg/
kg bw resulted in an average concentration of heptachlor in fat of 6.5 yg/g.  ,
This dose was fatal to the dogs within 2 to 11 weeks.
     Radomski and Davidow (1953) also determined the rate of accumulation  and
disappearance of heptachlor epoxide in rats (three rats/sex/group) fed a diet
containing 30 ppm  (30 mg/kg diet) heptachlor.  One group was sacrificed each
week for 12 weeks.  Female  rats accumulated heptachlor epoxide to a maximum
level of approximately 225  yg/g fat in 8 weeks, as compared with only 50 yg/g
fat in males.  When the test  diet was discontinued, heptachlor epoxide was no
longer detected at 8 weeks  for  female fat tissue and 6 weeks for male fat
tissue.  Further tests established that the maximum dietary level at which fat
storage  did  not occur was 0.3 mg/kg diet for male  rats and  0.1 mg/kg diet for
female rats.
     Although Radomski and  Davidow  (1953) failed to detect  heptachlor epoxide
in rat and  dog brain  tissue after heptachlor treatment,  Yamaguchi et al*
 (1979),  using a  gas  chromatographic  (GC) method, detected  3.15 ppm  heptachlor
epoxide  in  brain tissue  of  rats 5 hours  after  an  intraperitoneal  injection  of
200 mg heptachlor/kg bw.
4.1.3.   Metaboli sm
 4.1.3.1.  Chlordane—The metabolism of  chlordane  has  been  well studied  in  rats
 and rabbits in  vivo and in  vitro.   Oxychlordane was a metabolite of both  cis-
 and trans-chlordane (Street and Blau, 1972).   A metabolic  pathway,  based  upon
                                       4-8

-------
in vitro studies with rat liver homogenates, was proposed in which either iso-
mer is dehydrogenated to 1,2-dichlorochlordene with subsequent epoxidation to
oxychlordane.  In these experiments, trans-chlordane was converted to oxychlor-
dane at a sevenfold greater rate than was the cis-isomer.
     Barnett and Dorough (1974) isolated seven radioactive metabolites (in tf
addition to the respective unchanged parent compounds) in the feces of rats •
that had been administered cis- or trans-chlordane-14C or the 3:1 mixture of
cis- and trans-chlordane, designated as 14C-HCS-3260, either as single oral
doses (0.2 mg/kg bw) or by continuous feeding (5 mg/kg diet of 14C-HCS-3260
for 56 days or 25 mg/kg diet cis- or trans-chlordane-14C for 14 days).  These
metabolites, analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and gas-liquid chro,-
matography (GLC), were tentatively identified as hydroxychlordane; chlordene^
chlorohydrin; monochloro and dihydroxy derivatives of chlordane; cis- and/or
trans-dihydroxychlordane derivatives; a trihydroxylated chlordene; and a con^
jugated form of a hydroxylated chlordane metabolite.  No oxychlordane or diV;
chlorochlordene was detected in feces; however, oral administration of oxy-,
chlordane resulted in fecal excretion of unchanged oxychlordane.  The nature of
urinary metabolites was essentially the same as fecal metabolites in rats fed
HCS-3260 in dietary concentrations of 25 mg/kg diet; however, oxychlordane was
also present.  The 24-hour feces of a rabbit fed 14C-HCS-3260 at 25 mg/kg diet
for 2 days contained the same fecal metabolites found in the rat, although -the
amounts of unchanged isomers were greater.  The urine of the rabbit contained
a greater percentage of the conjugated hydroxylated metabolites than did the
urine of rats.                                                        --••
     In rabbits, Balba and Saha (1978) identified the following urinary metab-
olites of cis-chlordane:  l-hydroxy-2-chlorochlordene, trans-chlordene chloro-
hydrin, and 1-hydroxychlordene.  Urinary metabolites in rabbits of trans-chlor-
                                      4-9

-------
dane were l-hydroxy-2-chlorochlordene, 1,2-dichlorochlordene,  trans-chlordene
chlorohydrin, and 3-hydroxychlordane.  The metabolism of cis-  and  trans-chlor-
dane-14C was also studied in rats in vivo and in vitro by Tashiro  and  Matsumura
(1977).  Male rats maintained on diets containing cis- or trans-chlordane-14C
in a concentration of 100 ppm (100 mg/kg diet) for 4 weeks excreted 13 metab-
olites from cis- and 14 metabolites from trans-chlordane in the feces.  The
fecal metabolites of both isomers, identified by TLC and GLC,  included hepta-
chlor, 1,2-dichlorochlordene, oxychlordane, l-hydroxy-2-chlorochlordene, 1-
hydroxy-2-chloro-2,3-epoxychlordene, chlordene chlorohydrin, monohydroxy di-
hydrochlordene, 1,2-dihydroxychlordene, and trihydroxydihydrochlordene.  These
metabolites were found in different proportions, depending upon the administered
Isomer.  The only urinary metabolite identified from both cis- and trans-chlor-
dane was a glucuronide conjugate of 1-hydroxydihydrochlordene.  The in vitro
incubation of the isomers with  rat liver microsomes and cofactors resulted in
the same metabolites qualitatively.
     Brimfield et al.  (1978) also studied the in vitro metabolism of the pure
cis- and trans-isomers of chlordane by microsomal preparations from Sprague-
Dawley rats fed the  individual  isomers in dietary concentrations of 100 ppm
(100 mg/kg diet) for 9 days.   Incubation of cis-chlordane-induced enzymes with
cis-chlordane resulted in the  following metabolites,  identified by GC-MS:
cis-chlordane, dichlorochlordene, oxychlordane, dihydroheptachlor, hydrochlor-
dene,  and  l-chloro-2-hydroxydihydrochlordene.   Similar  products from  trans-
chlordane were identified;  however,  heptachlor  rather than  dihydroheptachlor
was  formed,  as was  hydroxychlordane.  A metabolic pathway,  based  upon  reduc-
tive dechlorination  via  dihydroheptachlor to  dihydrochlordene, was proposed.
According  to this  scheme, these molecules can also  be hydrolyzed,  desaturated,
and  epoxidized.   In  the  Brimfield et  al.  (1978)  proposal,  oxychlordane  is  an
                                       4-10

-------
 end  point, whereas in the scheme proposed by Tashiro and Matsumura  (1977),
 oxychlordane undergoes further hydroxylation and reduction.  Many of the pro-
 posed  intermediates in the Brimfield scheme have not actually been  found in
 this or other studies (Brimfield et al., 1978).
     Therefore, using the in vivo data by Barnett and Dorough (1974) and
 Tashiro and Matsumura (1977) as the primary references along with supporting
 in vitro data, the metabolic pathways proposed by Tashiro and Matsumura (1977)
 best fit the data reported.  Chlordane is dehydrogenated to dichlorochlordene,
 which  is epoxidized at carbons 2 and 3 and hydroxylated at carbon 1 (Route A).
 An additional route whereby chlordane is hydroxylated at carbon 1 to yield  :
 1-hydroxydihydrochlordene was also proposed (Route B).  Heptachlor is a minor
 metabolite of both cis- and trans-chlordane.  These pathways are presented in
 Figure 2.
 4.1.3.2.  Heptachlor—Davidow and Radomski  (1953) first identified heptachlor
 epoxide in the adipose tissue of dogs that had been treated with daily oral
 doses of 1-3 mg heptachlor/kg,bw in corn oil.   They concluded that the metab-
 olite arose by the epoxidization of heptachlor.  Subsequently, these investi-
 gators (Radomski  and Davidow, 1953) also isolated heptachlor epoxide,  identical
 to the compound found in dogs, from the adipose tissue of male and female rats
maintained on diets containing 30 to 35 ppm (30 to 35 mg/kg diet)  heptachlor.
     In an abstract of a Soviet study,  Ermakov (1977) reported that heptachlor,
 administered to rats and rabbits in single  oral doses of 28-50 mg/kg bw,  was
metabolized by reactions involving hydrolysis, hydroxylation, epoxidation,
dehydrogenation,  and molecular rearrangement,  but details as to  intermediate
structures were not given in  the abstract.
     The most extensive  investigation of the metabolic  fate of heptachlor  in
 rats  was performed by Tashiro and Matsumura  (1978)  in vivo  and in  vitro.   Over
                                     4-11

-------
                                          Cl
                                         Heptachlor
                                                                     /*     I  MOST ACTIVE

                                                                      N          ROUTE

                                                                      i        MAJOR ROUTE

                                                                      -—	MINOR ROUTE
               ci

             Cls-Chlordane
                                                     I     I
                                                     Cl    Cl
                                                  Trans-Chlordane
     ROUTE B
!
                                                                         ROUTE  A
                                                                         -Cl
         OH
         1-Hydro xydihydrochlorene
         UDPGA
                                     1-Hydroxy-2-Chlorochlordene
                                                      Cl  ^f  ^  "Cl

                                                           Cl   OH

                                                      1-Hydroxy-2-Chloro-

                                                      2,3-Epoxychlordene
Cl
    Cl    0-C6H906

 Qlucuronide Conjugate
                                                                      Cl
                                                                                OH
                                 ci
                      Cl   OH

            1.2-D!hydroxyd!hydrochlorden8
  cr  "Y"  "^  OH
      Cl

Trihydroxylated Metabolite
            Figure 2.   Proposed metabolic  pathways of chlordane  in rats,


            SOURCE:   Tashiro  and  Matsumura,  1977.
                                                4-12

-------
a 10-day period following a single oral unspecified dose of l^C-heptachlor
(position of label not specified) in corn oil, rats excreted >50 percent of the
administered radioactivity in feces, and <5 percent in urine.  The relative
abundance of fecal metabolites, expressed as percent of ^-compounds, were as
follows:  unchanged heptachlor, 26.2 percent; heptachlor epoxide, 13.1 percent;
1-hydroxychlordene, 19.5 percent; l-hydroxy-2,3-epoxychlordene, 17.5 percent;
1,2-dihydroxydihydrochlordene, 3.5 percent; and two unnamed metabolites, one of
which accounted for 19 percent of the radioactivity, the other for <0.1 percent.
The latter metabolite was designated as H-2 by these authors, and its structure
is identical to that proposed by Matsumura and Nelson (1971) for what they
called the fecal metabolite of heptachlor epoxide.  The in vitro metabolism of
14C-heptachlor by rat liver microsomal  preparations resulted in the following
relative abundance of metabolites, expressed as percent of the total 14C-com-
pounds: heptachlor, 4.4 percent; heptachlor epoxide, 85.8 percent; 1-hydroxy-
chlordene, 2.9 percent; 1-hydroxyepoxychlordene, 3.0 percent; 1,2-dihydroxydi-
hydrochlordene, 0.9 percent; and an unknown, 3.0 percent (Tashiro and Matsmura,
1978).  No H-2 fecal metabolite was detected.  The identity of the metabolites
was confirmed by TLC analysis and comparison with authentic standards of fecal
metabolites from rats fed diets containing 100 ppm (100 mg/kg diet) heptachlor
for 4 weeks.
     Matsumura and Nelson (1971) administered heptachlor epoxide to four rats
in dietary concentrations of 10 ppm (10 mg/kg diet) for 30 days.  The authors
estimated that each rat consumed 5 mg of heptachlor epoxide over the test
period and excreted 950 yg of a fecal  metabolite (see Figure 3) and 66 ug of
heptachlor epoxide in the feces.
     Brooks et al. (1968, 1970) investigated the in vitro metabolism of hepta-
chlor epoxide by pig liver microsomes.   The product, formed upon incubation at
                                      4-13

-------
       Cl     Cl
   Heptachlor epoxide
                                 Cl     Cl
                                 Heptachlor
Unnamed fecal metabolite
          H-2
  (2,3-epoxychlordene)
                OH
     1-Hydroxychlordene
          Cl    OH
1-Hydroxy-2,3-epoxychlordene
                                              OH
                                 Cl     OH
                        1,2-Dihydroxydihydrochlordene
          Figure 3.  Proposed metabolic pathway of heptachlor in rats,
          SOURCE:  Tashiro and Matsumura,  1978.
                                   4-14

-------
45°C for 60 hours, was identified as'heptathlon epoxide diol:
Incubation of heptachlor epoxide with rabbit microsomes also resulted in the
formation of heptachlor epoxide diol  as well as another unidentified product.
The in vivo product, 2,3-epoxychlordene, was not formed or identified in
these in vitro preparations.
     Therefore, the metabolic pathway of heptachlor in rats, as proposed by
Tashiro and Matsumura (1978), is presented in Figure 3.
4.1.4.  Excretion
4.1.4.1.  Chlordane—In the experiments of Barnett and Dorough (1974), >90 per-
cent of the administered radioactivity was excreted over 7 days by rats that
were given single oral  doses (0.2 mg/kg diet) of cis- or trans-chlordane-^4C or
l^C-HGS-3260,  Females  excreted 6 percent of the radioactivity in the urine,
while males excreted only 2 percent.   At higher doses (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg diet)
of HCS-3260, the pattern of elimination was essentially the same.  Females
excreted slightly, but  not significantly, more of the cis- than the trans-
isomer.  When 14C-HCS-3260 was fed in the diet for 56 days, fecal elimination
as measured by radioactivity was 70 percent for the 1 mg/kg diet level, 75 per-
cent for the 5 mg/kg diet level, and  80 percent for the 25 mg/kg diet level,
indicating possible decreased absorption; the investigators made no mention of
possible biliary excretion.  Elimination of cis-chlordane (75 percent) was
greater than trans-chlordane (65 percent) following 14 days of dietary levels
of the isomers at 25 mg/kg diet.
                                      4-15

-------
      Tashiro and Matsumura (1977)  reported  similar results  for  elimination  from
.rats treated with single oral  doses  of cis- (5.4 mg/kg  bw)  and  trans-chlordane-
 14C r(9«7 mg/kg bw) in corn oil.  The total  7-day elimination  of radioactivity
 from cis- and trans-chlordane  was  85 and 66 percent of  the  administered  dose,
 respectively.  The 24-hour total  excretion  was 59 percent for cis- and 27 per-
 cent for trans-chlordane.
      Rabbits excreted 18 percent  of  an orally administered  single dose of 200
 mg/kg bw of chlordane in the urine collected over 16 days when  organic chlorine
 contents were measured (Stohlman  et  al., 1950).  The peak urinary elimination
 of organic chlorine occurred within  2 days  and amounted to  9  percent of the
 dose.
      Poonawalla and Korte (1971)  observed appreciable urinary excretion of
 radioactivity by rabbits that received 14.3 mg/rabbit of trans-chlordane-14C
 daily for 10 weeks.  At the end of this period, approximately 70 percent of
 the daily dose had been eliminated:   22.7 percent was excreted  in the feces,
 30 percent of which was unchanged trans-chlordane, and 47 percent was excreted
 as urinary metabolites.  In agreement with these results, excretion of radio-
 activity by one rabbit 24 hours after termination of feeding  25 ppm (25 mg/kg
 diet) of HCS-3260-14C for 2 days  was 21 percent in feces and  33 percent in
 urine (Barnett and Dorough, 1974).
      Balba and Saha  (1978) also observed appreciable urinary  excretion of
 radioactivity of cis- or trans-chlordane-14C by rabbits that  were treated with
 either isomer orally at a dose of 100 mg/rabbit in a capsule  every 4 days up
 to 400 mg/rabbit; however, in this study, urinary excretion did not exceed
 fecal excretion.   For the cis-isomer, 48.5 percent and 28.4 percent of the
 radioactivity were eliminated in  the feces and urine, respectively.  For the
 trans-isomer, fecal  and urinary excretion were 46.1 percent and 35.8 percent,
                                       4-16

-------
respectively.
     When an unspecified amount oftehlordane-l^C in 20 yL of ethanol was ad-
ministered intratracheally to female Sprague-Dawley rats, elimination of radjio-
activity was primarily in the feces (Nye and Dorough, 1976).  After a lag    fl
period of 2 days during which <20 percent of the dose was eliminated, fecal, ,
excretion rose to approximately 50 percent by day 4 and 56 percent by day 6.
Urinary excretion over 6 days amounted to 12 percent of the dose.  No radio-
activity was detected in the expired air of these animals.                  •,•.._,-
4.1.4.2.  Heptachlor—Tashiro and Matsumura (1978) reported that rats excreted
>50 percent of the administered single oral unspecified dose of radioactivity
from -^C-heptachlor in the feces over 10 days.  Urinary excretion of radio-
activity accounted for <5 percent of the administered amount.
     In an abstract of a Soviet study (Ermakov, 1977), it was reported that 16
to 40 percent of the orally administered dose of heptachlor (28 to 50 mg/kg bw
to rats and rabbits was excreted unchanged in the feces and that heptachlor
epoxide was excreted over at least a 12-month period.  Further details were
not given.  As reported in an abstract of another Soviet study (Mizyukova and   ,
Kurchatov,- 1970), and as reviewed by U.S. EPA (1980b), heptachlor and its   .-.-•
metabolites were excreted mainly in the feces of rats within 5 days of an
intragastric dose of 120 mg/kg bw.                     ,
     Each of four male albino rats excreted an average of 950 ng of the fecal
metabolite of 99 percent pure heptachlor epoxide during 30 days of maintenance
on a diet containing 10 ppm (10 mg/kg diet) heptachlor epoxide (each rat con-
sumed approximately 5 mg over 30 days) (Matsumura and Nelson, 1971).  Approxi-
mately 66 pg of unchanged heptachlor epoxide was also excreted in the feces,?
4.1.5.  Species Differences                                          ,        ,,
     Some 30 to 40 percent of the 186 NCI chemicals tested in both rats and mice
                                      4-17

-------
were found to be positive in one species and negative in the other (Gold  et
a!., 1984).  Of these, approximately the same number were rat-positive and
mouse-negative as were mouse-positive and rat-negative.  However,  a review of
the bioassays of chlorinated hydrocarbons reveals a preponderance  of mouse-
positive and rat-negative studies.  As such, are chlorinated hydrocarbons more
toxic in mice than rats; initiators in mice but not in rats; or are there other
differences that lead to the apparent discrepancy between rats and mice for
carcinogenicity studies of chlorinated hydrocarbons?
     In the selection of the laboratory animal species for a carcinogenesis  bio-
assay, rats and mice have generally been used because of their size, lifespan,
and the fact that these species are reliable predictors of human carcinogens
for at least some chemicals.  As the need to extrapolate from animals to humans
has increased, along with the pressure to calculate the risk of exposure, the
selection  of species and the dosages continues to be discussed.  As late as
1976, when the NCI guidelines were published  (Sontag et al., 1976), considerable
discussion of the dosage centered on the "maximum tolerated," and only the no-
tion of the  importance  of metabolism data in  relation to target concentrations
was provided.  Recently, Haseman  (1985)  focused  on  dose selection for  NTP
studies and  restated the possible importance  of  pharmacokinetic and metabolism
studies.   Much of the discussion  of metabolism data centers  on qualitative
similarities to  humans  and  the  possible  consequences of metabolic overload.
      In  actuality,  very little  metabolism data are  available in both  rats and
mice  for  any class  of chemicals,  including  chlorinated  hydrocarbons.   The
metabolism of  chlordane and heptachlor has  been  studied  in  rats but  not  in
mice;  however, there  is considerable  evidence that  significant  species differ-
 ences exist  with regard to  other  substances.  Such  differences  could  be  direct-
 ly related to  the  carcinogenic  response in  rats  and mice.
                                       4-18

-------
     There have been a number of reports that emphasize metabolic differences
among laboratory animal species (Brodie, 1962; Forrest and Aber, 1968; NAS,
1969; Oehme, 1970; Hanley et al., 1970; Conney et al., 1974; Zapp, 1977).   9c
Table 2 shows the large range of metabolic differences that can occur among
animal species and humans.


     TABLE 2.  SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN THE METABOLISM OF THREE CHEMICALS

Species
Mouse
Rat
Guinea pig
Rabbit
Dog
Human
Metabolic
Hexabarbital
19
140
	 a
60
260
360
half -life (min)
Antipyrene
11
141
110
63
107
600

Aniline
35
71
45
35
167
— —
aData not available.
SOURCE:  Adapted from Conney et al., 1974.
     Similarly, a 200-fold difference was noted among species to elicit a phar-
macologic response of ICI 33,828 on the pituitary, while the maximum plasma
concentration was identical in all  species tested, including humans.  In addi-
tion, consideration of the rate and pattern of metabolism is of great impor-
tance (NAS, 1969).  These types of data have recently led investigators to  '
place greater emphasis on pharmacokinetic and metabolism data (Neal, 1983; NTP,
1984; Bernstein et al., 1985).
     The use of pharmacokinetic data in estimating the human inhaled dose from
oral data for laboratory animals has been reported (Cavender and Salasin, 1982).
                                      4-19

-------
Although considerable data for rats were available, very little data for mice
were found for chlorinated hydrocarbons.  Recently, Prout et al. (1985)  pub-
lished data for rats and mice for trichloroethylene, and Tables 3 and 4  present
pharmacokinetic data for two strains of rats and two strains of mice. Of par-
ticular importance is the difference in urinary excretion and exhaled parent
compound.  The mouse apparently has a greater capacity for metabolizing  tri-
chloroethylene, which may lead to higher concentrations of important interme-
diates or metabolites than are possible in the rat.  In this case, the parent
compound is exhaled over time in the rat but not in the mouse.  For compounds
that are readily stored in fat depots, they may be metabolized over days and
weeks.  These data emphasize the fact that, although the relative proportion of
metabolites is similar for the two species, there are considerable differences
in the quantitative data, especially at the high dosages.  Unfortunately, sim-
ilar data do not exist for chlordane, heptachlor, or heptachlor epoxide.  How-
ever, these data do emphasize the fact that the pharmacokinetic and metabolic
differences may be quite different for the two species and may relate to the
"sensitivity" of mice and/or the "resistance" of rats to these chlorinated
hydrocarbons.           \
4.2.  TOXIC EFFECTS
     The toxic effects of chlordane/heptachlor were not addressed in a previ-
ous report of the Carcinogen Assessment Group (U.S. EPA, 1977).  Thus, the key
studies are reviewed here.
4.2.1.  Human Studies
     Data describing effects in humans  range from information collected  through
clinical case studies and human monitoring data to epidemiologic studies.  The
three effects seen most frequently in clinical case studies are central  nervous
system  (CNS) effects, blood dyscrasias, and neuroblastomas.  Eleven  case studies
                                      4-20

-------



1 1 1
o
1— 1
rH
U-
CO
to
CQ
o
"*
co
«=c
LU
§
LU
LU
z
o;
0
CO
co
o
z
*""*
LU
LU
_J
3T
LU
O
Of.
O
_J
0
r— 1
1—
1— 1
u_
o
LU
CO
0
o
_1
^
o

LU
j_j:|
CD
|_^
co


LI-
CD

z
o
^H
1— 1
t— 1
LU



CO

LU
CO




















-o
CO
.p
CO
u
X
CU
co
CO
O
o



































,_
IO
o




.O.
v>
as
o
fO
CJ


CU
en
c
IO
o
c






CM
O
U




CU
o
LL.


c
'£
— '




CU t-
•p- ^-^






(O
co
CO
0.
CO



en
CO**^

o en
—














•=TrH
O CO
+ 1+1
CO CTl
rH CO




P-. rH
O rH
+ 1+1

r** CTi

CTl rH
o co
+ 1+1
LO LO
in in
1— 1
co P-.
rH <3-
+ 1+1
.CO CO
tO LO
tO LO



CM
O







CU
00
4-> 3
IO O
cm s





o
rH

00 CTl
rH rH
+ 1+1

LO rH
r*» P~»
CTi CTl

«3- 0
O rH
+ 1+1
«* 00
CO «*




0 O
o o




CM 1 —
0 0
+ 1+1
P^ CO
CM CM

CTl 00
0 0
+ 1+1
00 P--
CM rH
OO "*
0 0
+ 1+1
1— 1 1— 1
co «*



CM
1
CM







CU
V)
•!-> 3
as O
on s:






















rH CO
LO rH
+ 1+1
f-» O
CM tO




rH LO
0 O
+ 1+1
tO CTl
CM VO

OO O
O rH
+ 1+1
rH rH
CM CM
rH
^- 00
rH «*
+ 1+1
CM CM
rH CTl
^- in


^
CM
O







CO
I/)
•4-> 3
OS O
oc s:





o
o
LO

00 «=!•
CO CM
+ 1+1

rH tO
CO r«!
CTl CTl

LO CO
0 0
+ 1+1
00 «*
co «a-




O 0
o o




CM CM
O 0
+ 1+1
rH O
rH CM

to-*
O 0
+ 1+1
CM «*
CM CM
oo to
O CM
+ 1+1
^r in
CM «*



CM
1
CM







CO
OO

0 O
+ 1+1
rH O
CM to

in in
O CTi
+ 1+1
P^ 0
rH CO
rH
00 OO
0 0
+ 1+1
CM OO
CTl rH
CM «*



CM
O







o>
00
•!-> 3
ie o





o
0
o
rH
in CM
0 rH
+ 1+1

P^ CM
LO LO
CTl CTl

«d- CM
O CTl
+ 1+1
•3- to
CM 00




o o
O 0




CO ^t-
0 O
+ 1+1
CO to
0 rH

to CM
O rH
+ 1+1
*!• O
rH CM
CM rH
O rH
+ 1+1
CTl to
t— 1 ^~



CM
P-.
1
CM







CU
oo
-(-> 3
IO O
en 2:






















to CM
CM «5f
+ 1+1
CO to
1 — CO
1 — rH



rH «^-
0 0
+ 1+1
o o
rH IO

to o
O CM
+ 1+1
CM CO
CM LO
1— 1
CO 1 —
CO CO
+ 1+1
CM 1 —
CO CO
rH «3-



CM
o







CO
•4-> 3
as O
Qi 2:





o
o
o
CM
CTi to
LO CM
+ 1+1

O CTi
CO rH
CTl CTl

O LO
Q 0
+ 1+1
co co
i— 1 CO




O 0
0 0




i— 1 rH
0 Q
+ 1+1
«d- oo
0 rH

LO P~
0 0
+ 1+1
CM «=J-
rH CO
rH tO
0 0
+ 1+1
oo oo
o co



CM
P--
1
CM







CO
00
4J 3
as O
oi. E:











































%
LO
• co
t_ CTl
£^ rH
• CM *
! Q 1 — •
I CO i—
. 4-> as
1 •)->
10 c/> CO
C 00.
IO fO 4-^
i CO O 3
E t- 0
• as t-.
co a. o a.
t_ =3
10 O C E
t_ -i- O
c en c_
5 en M-
o t_ c:
j± co -i- -a
00 Q. C CO
«/>  C CO
•a 3 ••
T3 LU
..£_•!- O
LU 3 to C£.
1— O CO =5
o LL. on o
Z(O J3 CO
4-21

-------


1™
re

o
H-


.£)
CO
CO
re
o
t_
re
o
H- « . .
UJ.
UJ -O
_J - .": 0)
>*• - cn
3= C
H- re
UJ - J=
o UJ u
c: o T5 c
1 *V t %
— J •£• •r'
a: o>

1-4 UJ O
H- co o>
1 CO
O UJ CD
«3* 3» CO CM
rH 1 0 O
U. CO
O *—• ^
UJ CO • '
CO
o a

	 i *^
• '«-
H- -J . ! .
2: uj
rH O
5 ~
' re
• a
•et-

UI
f
CO
MSC
»— re
VJ
ai

o
QJ
OL
CO







ai cn
co -i<:
o ~^
a cn
^•^
















in 10
CD 0

+ 1+1

0 O
• •
rH rH



«* rH
rH rH

+ 1+ 1

•=*• ^f
J^*« rH
rH



cn CM
CM <0
+ 1+1
in CM
in co
rH rH


C3 *3t"
in in
+ 1+1
to in
"3- (O
in in






rH









0)
CO
4-> 3
re o










o
rH






















O O
• •
o o



«=f CM
o o

+ 1+1

cn co
rH CM




r-- co
«3- O
+ 1+1
CM 00
r- rH


•=f 10
0 O
+ 1+1
O^ ^~I
CM CM







CM









0}
V)
4-* 3
re o
cn s:












CO 10
<3- rH
+ 1+1

O^ T— i
* •
CM <0
o cn
rH
co co
rH O
+ 1+1

rH CO
• •
o in
rH


1 1
1 1







CM CM
0 O

+ 1+1

CM OO
o o




cn CM
0 0
+ 1+1
«* 10
rH O


CM rH
0 0
+ 1+1
co 10
o o







CO









a>
CO
+-> 3
re o





























CM CO
«* in

+ 1+1

cn in
• •
cn CM
*^" rH


o co
rH O

+ 1+1

r-» in
CO l»-




CO CO
rH «*
+ 1+1
CO rH
CO CM
rH


o co
«3- in
+ 1+1
cn =r  3
re o













i — cn
rH «d-
+ 1+1

CO CM
« •
in cn
cn cn
«3- CM
•rH rH
+ 1+1

<* o
• •
in «*

CM
1 — 1

1 + 1

0
•
^J-



CO CO
o o

+ 1+1

10 cn
0 0




r** to
0 0
+ 1+1
CO rH
O rH


i"H *srf"
0 0
+ 1+1
«=r r-
O 0







CO









a>
CO
-t-> 3
re o
CXL E:






























































• •
i.
.c
• CM
a r--.
oo
^
•f- 1 re

CO CO
C CO
re re
CO 0
E c-
• re
co a. o
t. 3
re o c:
C- -r-
c cn
3 cn
O t- c
J= 0) -r-
co o. c
co co re
CO i— E
3 re co
"re -i- *"
> C CO
re 3
•o
. . C_ -r-
UJ 3 CO
I— 0 CO
O U_ Qi
"zz re .a

















































m
CO
cn
rH
n
•
,__
re

j %
a>

^_j
3
O
t_
a.

e
o
i.
M-

•o
CO
a.
re
-a



UJ
o
a:
o
CO

-------
describing CNS effects following oral, dermal,  or inhalation exposure to  tech-
nical grade chlordane are described in the literature.   Six of these case
studies involve oral  exposure to chlordane.  Effects ranged from irritability,
salivation, labored respiration, muscle tremors, and convulsions to death.
Derbes et al. (1955)  described the death of a 32-year-old woman who ingested
104 mg/kg of chlordane in a dust formulation.  Findings at autopsy included
cerebral congestion and edema and lower nephron nephrosis.  Convulsions were
exhibited before death.  Convulsions and vomiting accompanied other oral  inges-
tions of chlordane (Dadey and Kammer, 1953; Lensky and  Evans, 1952; Aldrich and
Holmes, 1969; and Curley and Garrettson, 1969).  The other five reports involv-
ing CNS effects involve dermal or a combination of dermal and inhalation expo-
sure.  Although dose level could not be quantified for  these exposures, two
resulted in death.  Other CNS effects include convulsions, lethargy, and diz-
ziness (Kutz et al., 1983; Derbes et al., 1955; Furie and Trubowitz, 1976;
Klemmer et al., 1977; and Barnes, 1967).
     Eight cases of blood dyscrasias have been reported following exposure  to
chlordane or  heptachlor:  four aplastic anemias (Infante et al., 1978; Klemmer
et al., 1977), one refractory megaloblastic anemia (Furie and Trubowitz, 1976),
one  acute stem cell leukemia  (Infante et al., 1978), one acute lymphoblastic
leukemia  (Infante et al., 1978), and one acute myelomonocytic leukemia (Infante
et al., 1978).  Muirhead et al.  (1959) and Loge (1965)  reported 5 and 12 cases
of aplastic anemia, respectively, associated with either chlordane; a combina-
tion of chlordane and heptachlor; or chlordane, heptachlor, and other chemicals.
The  American  Medical Association's Council on Drugs (Anonymous, 1962) stated
that a  "specific cause-effect relationship exists" between exposure to chlor-
dane and  resulting blood dyscrasias.
     Infante  et al.  (1978) described five cases of neuroblastoma in children
                                      4-23

-------
with a pre- and/or postnatal history of exposure to technical  grade chlordane.
This is consistent with documented transplacental transfer of chlordane in
humans (Curley et al., 1969; Wasserman et al., 1972, 1974; Zavon et al., 1969).
     Savage et al. (1973, 1981) and Strassman and Kutz (1977), in results from
human monitoring studies, reported levels of heptachlor epoxide and oxychlor-
dane, metabolites of heptachlor and chlordane, respectively.  Savage et al.
(1981) found detectable levels of heptachlor epoxide in 67 percent of 1,436 hu-
man milk samples from nursing mothers at 163 hospitals stratified by geographic
location.  Oxychlordane was reported in 74 percent of the samples.  Samples
collected from the southeastern United States tended to have a higher percent-
age of samples with detectable levels of each metabolite than other regions of
the country.  Human milk samples of 54 women in Hawaii were collected during
1979 and 1980 (Takei et al., 1983).  Oxychlordane was detected in 100 percent
of the samples, with a mean of 0.068 ppm and a maximum value of 0.55 ppm.
Heptachlor epoxide was also detected in all samples, with a mean of 0.036 ppm
and a maximum value of 0.068 ppm.
     Data from the EPA's National Human Monitoring Program show that levels of
Oxychlordane and heptachlor epoxide in human adipose tissue have remained con-
stant over the years 1970 to 1983 (U.S. EPA, 1985a).  The geometric mean of,
Oxychlordane from 1972 to 1983 (excluding 1982) was 0.11 ppm with a maximum
mean of 0.09 in 1981.  Levels of heptachlor epoxide ranged from a geometric
mean of 0.07 ppm in 1972 and 1977-79 to 0.09 ppm in 1970-71, 1973, 1981, and
1983, with a mean of 0.08 ppm for all years (excluding 1982).
4.2.2.  Laboratory Animal Studies
4.2.2.1.  Chlordane—Symptoms of acute chlordane intoxication include CNS stim-
ulation, as evidenced by irritability, tremors, and convulsions (U.S. EPA,
1985a).  When chlordane was given orally to rats at a dose of 25 mg/kg bw/day
                                      4-24

-------
for 15 days, it had no toxic effects, whereas 50 mg/kg bw or more resulted in
toxic effects and death; cumulative toxic effects were observed (Ambrose et
al., 1953a).  The toxic effects of chlordane in rats include CNS stimulation,
stomach ulcers, inflammation of the intestine, nephritis, hepatitis, an in'-"
crease in liver weight, coma, and death (Boyd and Taylor, 1969).
     In a review by Fouts (1970), chlordane induced hepatic drug-metabolizing
enzymes in all species examined.  Estradiol-17B and estrone metabolism were'
also stimulated by chlordane pretreatment in mice and rats, respectively   w
(Welch'et al., 1971).                                                       •
     Osborne-Mendel rats were fed diets containing chlordane for 80 weeks cmd
held until week 109.  Decreased body weight gain was noted in males receiving
407 ppm (approximately 20.3 mg/kg bw) in the diet and in females receiving 242
ppm (approximately 12.1 mg/kg bw).  Tremors were noted in the females at week
44, and the animals that survived to termination were in poor condition (NCI,
1977a).                                                                    -
     B6C3F1 mice were fed diets containing chlordane for 80 weeks and held un-
til weeks 90-91.  No body weight effects were noted, but tremors were observed
in female mice at week 20.  Alopecia was noted in male and female mice, and a
hunched appearance was noted in a few mice.  Abdominal distension was observed
in all  groups but was predominant in the females.  Increased mortality inci-'
dence was noted for male mice fed 29.9 ppm (approximately 1.5 mg/kg bw) (px'
0.02) and 56.2 ppm (approximately 2.8 mg/kg bw) (p <_ 0.01).  No mortality dif-
ferences were noted for female mice (NCI, 1977a).
     In an unpublished study by Velsicol Chemical Corporation (1984), Wistar4
rats and cynomolgus monkeys were exposed to 0, 0.1, 1.0, or 10 mg/m3 for 90
days.  Some of the low-exposure group rats were held for 17 days after exposure
as a recovery group.  No effects were noted on mortality, body weight, food''
                                      4-25

-------
consumption, ophthalmoscopy, pulmonary function,  rectal  temperature,  hema-
tology, or urinalysis for either rats or monkeys.   Blood levels of calcium,
cholesterol, and glutamine dehydrogenase and liver cytochrome P-450 levels were
increased in male and/or female rats.  Increased  organ weights were noted  for
male and/or female rats for the brain, liver, kidneys, and thyroids,  while
there was a decrease in adrenal weight in female  rats.  For monkeys,  liver and
thyroid weights were increased but not statistically significantly different
from control group values.  For microscopic pathology, only adaptive liver
changes were significantly different for rats and monkeys.  Male rats also ex-
hibited an increase in the height of the follicular epithelium of the thyroid.
Based on these results, the NOEL for chlordane in rats and monkeys was 0.1
mg/m3 and the LOEL was 1.0 mg/m3.
     In an earlier unpublished study by Velsicol  Chemical Corporation (1983b),
ICR mice were fed 0, 1, 5, or  12.5 ppm chlordane (approximately 0, 0.15, 0.71,
or 1.79 mg/kg bw) in the diet  for 2 years.   In mice receiving 5 or 12.5 ppm,
liver changes were noted, including'increased levels of serum glutamic-oxalo-
acetic transaminase (S60T) and serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (SGPT);
hepatocellular swelling and necrosis; and increased liver weight in both male
and female mice.  The  NOEL for chlordane was 1 ppm and the LOEL was 5 ppm.
     In another  unpublished study by Velsicol Chemical Corporation (1983a),
Fischer 344  rats were  fed diets containing  0, 1, 5, or 25 ppm chlordane
(approximately 0, 0.05, 0.25,  or 1.25 mg/kg bw) for 130 weeks.  There was a
significant  increase in liver  weight for females receiving 5 or 25 ppm at weeks
26 and 52, but not at  week  130.  Liver weight was significantly increased in
males  receiving  5 or 25 ppm at week  130, but not at weeks 26 or 52.  An in-
creased incidence of hepatocellular  swelling was noted in males receiving 1, 5,
or 25  ppm.   Based on these  results,  the  NOEL for female  rats was  1 ppm but was
                                      4-26

-------
not established for male rats.  The LOEL for female rats was 5 ppm and for,male
rats was 1 ppm.
                                                         '   •              . '*_*..".:  ••
    . .An additional unpublished chronic study was performed in dogs by Wazeter
(1967,, cited in Vettorazzi, 1975).  The dogs were maintained for 2 years on ,,,
diets containing chlordane at levels of 0, 0.3, 3, 15, or 30 ppm (approximately
0, 0.008, 0.075, 0.375, or 0.75 mg/kg bw).  The effects observed were increased
liver weight and histologic changes in the liver.  A scientific review panel
for WHO/FAO examined this study and concluded that no effects were observed, at
exposures of 3 mg/kg diet or less.  No other data ,on the experimental design or
results of this study were found.
     Mice maintained for 4 months on a diet containing 100 ppm chlordane
(approximately 14.3 mg/kg bw) had decreased viability of offspring. (Deichmann,.
and Kepiinger, 1966).  Chlordane decreased fertility in male and female rats
(Ambrose et al., 1953a) and in female mice (Welch et al., 1971).  Ambrose et,,
al. (1953b) reported reduced survival of offspring for rats fed 640 and 1280 ,
ppm chlordane (approximately 32 and 64 mg/kg bw).
4.2.2.2.  Heptachlor—Symptoms of acute heptachlor intoxication include trem-
                                               -            •                :' if •:
ors, convulsions, paralysis, and hypothermia (U.S. EPA, 1985a).  Daily oral
administration,, of 2 or 5 mg/kg bw heptachlor for 78-86 days to pigs, sheep, ,and
rats induced hepatic, necrosis and synthesis of smooth endoplasmic reticulum.
Rats were the most sensitive species (Halacka et al., 1975).  Chronic admini-
stration of intramuscular injections in rats with daily doses of 3 and 15 mg/kg
bw. heptachlor or 1 and 5 mg/kg bw heptachlor epoxide decreased liver size but.
had no. effect on other tissues.  Certain hepatic and renal gluconeogenic en-.
zymes were stimulated (Kacew et al., 1973).
     Shain et al. (1977) found that feeding of heptachlor (99.8 percent) to
male Sprague-Dawley rats for 90 days at an average dose of 1.29 mg/kg bw/day-•
                                      4-27

-------
significantly reduced the food consumption and mean body weight gain in a sub-
group of 12 randomly selected rats.  In another subgroup of 22 rats, body
weight was not reduced and no changes were observed in testicular or ventral
prostate.  Histologic examination of the rats was not performed, since the
study was designed to determine the effect of heptachlor on prostate homeosta-
sis.  Rats were castrated 24 hours before sacrifice.  Cytoplasmic, but not
nuclear, androgen receptor site content of the ventral prostate was signifi-
cantly increased.   Ventral prostate protein content was reduced to 13 percent
of control levels, and cell number was reduced to 18 percent of control.
     In an unpublished report by IRDC (1973b), a 25:75 mixture of heptachlor:
heptachlor epoxide was administered to groups of 100 male and 100 female CD-I
mice in the diet at 0, 1, 5, and 10 ppm (approximately 0, 0.14, 0.71, and 1.43
mg/kg bw) for 18 months.  An interim sacrifice of 10 mice/sex/group was per-
formed at 6 months.  Female mice at the 10 mg/kg diet level had decreased body
weight gain; otherwise, no other effect on body weight or food consumption was
observed.  Mean liver weight increased significantly in a dose-related manner
in treated females and males at 6 and 18 months.  This increase was more marked
in males.  Survival, although underestimated due to the interim sacrifice, was
29 percent for males and 30 percent for females at the highest dose level and
51-66 percent for all other groups, including controls.  Increased incidence
of hepatocytomegaly in all treated female and male groups occurred in a dose-
related manner.  The incidence of hyperplastic nodules, as reported by IRDC
(1973a), was dose-related at the two highest levels for males and females and
was highly significant (p < 1 x lO'9).  Reevaluation of histologic slides by
six other pathologists resulted in several different interpretations; however,
the overall result was a decreased incidence of hyperplasia in favor of a
greater incidence of carcinoma.  Further discussion of this study is presented
                                      4-28

-------
in the Cardnogenicity section.
     Davis (1965) administered 0 and 10 ppm (approximately 0 and 1.43 mg/kg bw)
heptachlor or heptachlor epoxide to groups of 100 male and 100 female C3H mice
for 2 years.  For heptachlor, low survival was observed for treated (30 percent)
as well as control  (34 percent) mice.  For heptachlor epoxide, survival was:'9.5
percent.  A twofold increase over controls in the incidence of hepatic hyper-
pi asi a and of benign tumors was observed for both compounds, although reevalu-
ation of the slides by four other pathologists changed the interpretation in
favor of a greater number of hepatomas.
     Reuber (1977a, 1978), using slides from the study of Davis (1965), found
hepatic vein thrombosis and cirrhosis among the heptachlor and heptachlor
epoxide (10 ppm in the diet) treated mice.  These conditions were not observed
in any of the 127 control slides available for review.  For heptachlor-treated
mice, 13 percent (10 percent of males, 15 percent of females) had hepatic vein
thrombosis and 6 percent had venous occlusion with recent liver infarcts.
Thrombosis of the cardiac atrium was also present in some mice with hepatic .
vein thrombosis.  The incidence of cirrhosis was 2/86 treated males and 5/77
treated females.  For heptachlor epoxide, 10 percent of treated mice (7 percent
of males, 11 percent of females) had hepatic vein thrombosis and 9 percent had
venous occlusion.  Cardiac atrium thrombosis was present in some mice.  The
incidence of cirrhosis was 12/78 treated males and 15/81 treated females.  In
addition, liver carcinomas were also observed in the treated mice.
     In the NCI  (1977b) bioassay of the carcinogenicity of heptachlor, groups
of 50 male and 50 female Osborne-Mendel rats and groups of 50 B6C3F1 mice of
each sex were maintained on diets containing technical grade heptachlor for
80 weeks plus 21 and 10 weeks of observation for rats and mice, respectively.
Controls for the rats consisted of 10 matched and 60 pooled untreated rats
                                      4-29

-------
(controls from concurrent and recent bioassays of other related compounds)  per
sex.  For male mice, 20 matched and 100 pooled controls were used, arid for
female mice, 10 matched and 80 pooled controls were used.  Male rats were fed
38.9 or 77.9 ppm (approximately 1.95 or 3.90 mg/kg bw) and female rats were fed
25.7 or 51.3 ppm (approximately 1.29 or 2.57 mg/kg bw) while male mice were fed
6.1 or 13.8 ppm (approximately 0.87 or 1.97 mg/kg bw) and female mice were  fed
9.0 or 18.0 ppm (approximately 1.29 or 2.57 mg/kg bw).
     For rats, mean body weights of high-dose males and females were consis-
tently depressed, especially in males.  The low-dose groups had growth rates
similar to controls.  Adverse clinical signs such as loss of" body weight, rough
and discolored hair, and palpable masses developed in treated and untreated
groups.  In some females from both dose groups, vaginal bleeding developed
after 80 weeks.  A dose-related but not statistically significant increase  in
mortality was observed for treated males.  The increase was statistically sig-
nificant for treated female groups.  Histopathologic signs of aging, such as
chronic nephritis, biliary hyperplasia, and chronic prostatitis, were observed
with about equal frequency in all control and treated groups.  The incidences
of follicular and C-cell hyperplasia in thyroid glands of treated and control
groups were observed to be non-treatment-related.                   ;
     The results in mice indicated no differences in body weight gains among
groups.  Sores and hair loss occurred in treated and control mice during the
first year.  Abdominal distention and hair loss were prevalent in high-dose
females.  Adverse clinical signs developed in mice of all groups.  Male mortal-
ity was unaffected; however, there was a significant dose-related increase  in
mortality for treated female groups.  Hepatocytomegaly and diffuse hyperplasia
occurred infrequently in individuals of all groups.
     Witherup et al. (1955) studied the effects of heptachlor on groups of  20
                                      4-30

-------
male and 20 female CF rats administered dietary concentrations of 0 to 10 ppm
(approximately 0 to 1.43 mg/kg bw) for 110 weeks.  Mortality among test groups
was not dose-related.  Loss of body weight, decreased food consumption, and
increased liver weight were noted among treated males but not among females.
These signs were marked for males fed 10 ppm.  Liver lesions described as
"chlorinated hydrocarbon" type and considered to be nonneoplastic were observed
in 17 percent of the males and 50 percent of the females at 10 ppm, and in 38
percent of the males and 17 percent of the females at 7 ppm.  At dose level,s at
or below 5 ppm diet, none of these lesions was observed.
     In a later study, Witherup et al. (1959) studied the effects of heptachlor
epoxide on groups of 25 male and 25 female CFN rats administered the compound
in the diet for 108 weeks.  The dietary concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 10
ppm (approximately 0.07 to 1.43 mg/kg bw).  Control rats received heptachlor
epoxide-free diets.  No differences were observed with respect to food consump-
tion or growth rate.  There was a dose-related increase in liver weight in
females.  Hepatic cell vacuolization occurred in treated males.  Hepatocyto-
megaly, degeneration, and regeneration in unspecified groups were reported.
Mortality was higher than the control level for all treated groups, but a
dose-response relationship was not observed.
     Jolley et al. (1966) administered a 75:25 mixture of heptachlor:hepta-
chlor epoxide to groups of 25 female CD rats in the diet at concentrations of
5 to 12.5 ppm (approximately 0.25 to 0.625 mg/kg bw) for 2 years.  A group of
54 rats received diets free of insecticide.  Mortality was increased in a
somewhat dose-related way.  Comprehensive histologic evaluations were per-
formed.  Spontaneous lesions and tumors were present in all groups and included
multiple cell-type hypertrophy, telangiectasia in the anterior pituitary, and
adrenal hypertrophy.  The incidence of hepatocytomegaly was increased over con-
                                      4-31

-------
trol levels at 7.5, 10.0, and 12.5 ppm.
     Mestitzova (1967) found that heptachlor (98.1 percent)  administered  in
the diet at a dose at 6 mg/kg bw for 52 weeks resulted in markedly decreased
litter sizes, decreased lifespan of pups, and the development of cataracts in
parent rats and pups.  It is unclear whether the 6 mg/kg bw dose was  admini-
stered daily or whether it represented a total  dose consumed over 1 year. In
the former case, the dose would be quite high,  roughly corresponding  to a
concentration of 120 mg/kg diet, assuming that a rat consumes 5 percent daily
of its body weight as food.  In the latter case, the dose would be quite  low,
resulting in a daily average of approximately 0.016 mg/kg bw/day.
     Injection of 1.5 mg/egg heptachlor resulted in a 12 percent reduction in
hatchability but no abnormal chicks (Smith et al., 1970).  However, it was
toxic to sea urchins and many abnormal embryos were induced (Bresch and Arendt,
1977).
4.3.  MUTAGENICITY
     Evaluations of the published mutagenicity studies on chlordane and hepta-
chlor have recently been completed by the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP).
The OPP memoranda of November 1986 containing descriptions of the studies and
evaluations are appended to this document.   Presented below are the overall
interpretations of the data extracted  from the OPP chlordane and heptachlor
reports, respectively.
4.3.1.    Chlordane
     A total of 25 published articles  containing information on 34 assays test-
ing technical- or commercial-grade chlordane were reviewed.  Approximately two-
thirds of the studies were judged unacceptable or inconclusive because of study
deficiencies or inadequate reporting of critical information required for inde-
pendent verification of  results.  While the  remaining nine studies were adequate
                                       4-32

-------
 to  satisfy minimal  data  requirements  for the genetic end points routinely  ?
 requested by OPP  (gene mutation, chromosome damage, and DNA repair), they do
 not  provide a  fully comprehensive data set upon which to definitively assess
 the  mutagenic  potential  of chlordane.  The following general conclusions on the
 mutagenicity of chlordane are warranted:
     1.  Neither  technical- nor commercial-grade chlordane appears to be muta-
         genic in bacterial assays.
     2.  Although negative responses  have been obtained in some less well-; ;
         established mammalian cell systems, chlordane and/or one of its isomers
         have  induced positive results without activation in other mammalian
         cell  mutation systems.  However, in these positive studies testing in
         the presence of S-9 activation was not conducted.   Hence, the question
         of whether chlordane induces gene mutations in mammalian  cells  still
         needs to be clarified.
     3.  Chlordane was negative in mouse dominant lethal  assays and in an in
         vitro mammalian cell  cytogenetics assay; however,  there are no  data
         for in vivo somatic cytogenetic end points.
     4.  Chlordane was reported negative in in vitro DNA repair assays using
         mouse, rat, and hamster hepatocytes.
     5.  Positive effects of chlordane have been  reported for  sister chromatid
         exchange (SCE)  in fish and human cells in culture  and for gene  con-
         version  in  yeast.   All  of these assays have had  limited utility  in
         genetic  toxicology,  and the paucity of data for  more  traditional
         assays precludes the  incorporation of  these findings  into an  overall
         classification  of the mutagenetic  potential  of chlordane.
4.3.2.   Heptachlor
     Eighteen  published  articles  containing information on 32  assays  were
                                      4-33

-------
reviewed for genotoxic effects of heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide.   Again,  the
majority of the assay reports were judged inadequate or inconclusive for  reasons
mentioned previously for chlordane.  The results of these assays,  however,  were
not significantly different from the results in the 10 assays judged to be
acceptable.  Following are the general conclusions on the mutagenicity of hep-
tachlor.
     1.  Neither heptachlor nor heptachlor epoxide appears to induce gene
         mutations in bacteria or mammalian cells in culture.
     2.  Both heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide were negative in mouse dominant
         lethal assays.  While one study did report an increase in resorptions
         and "abnormal mitoses" in a three-generation reproduction test, this
         was only reported as an abstract, and was therefore judged inconclu-
         sive.  The absence of data for either in vitro or in vivo direct
         cytogenetic  effects  precludes a definitive statement about the clasto-
         genic  potential of heptachlor.
     3.  Heptachlor was negative in in vitro DNA  repair assays using mouse,
         rat, and hamster  hepatocytes, and in  bacterial DNA  damage tests using
         repair-deficient  strains.
 4.4.   CARCINOGENICITY
 4.4.1.  Animal  Studies
 4.4.1.1.   Chiordane—Chiordane  has been  studied  in  four mouse and four rat
 long-term  carcinogenesis  bioassays.   Tables  5  and 6  present  a summary  of the
 experimental  design  and tumor results.   Each study  is  described in  more  detail
 in the following  sections.
 4.4.1.1.1.  Studies  with  Mice.
      4.4.1.1.1.1.   Becker and Sell (1979).   A  90:10 mixture  of  chlordane/hepta-
 chlor was  fed to  an  unspecified number of male C57B1/6N mice at concentrations

                                       4-34

-------















UJ
Q
Oi
O

31
O

C£
0
u_

co
l—
co
UJ
1—

>—
1—

I — 1
z.
UJ
CD
O
4^
t— 1
{J
a:
-
o:

i —
UJ
i — i
Q
UJ
CO
~~)
O
^"

u_
o

>-
s:
CO


LO
UJ

CO
g

















OJ
0
c
O) OJ
t- 0
oj c_
<4- 3
OJ O
o: co







CO
] ^
i—
3
CO
OJ


s_
o
E
3
1—






M- C
0 0
•^^ •!—
C OJ 4->
O £- 03
•i- 3 >
4-> CO t_
03 O OJ
£_ Q. CO
Z3 X -Q
O OJ O





OJ . — .
co E
O Q.
Q 0.
*k_^'







X
QJ
CO
"""7
o

c
• r—
03
S-
j ^
CO


A
1—
O)
CO

T3
C
03

£_
QJ
v^ ^y^
U r~-
OJ O1
CO .-H

CO
03
E
O
c:
•r- l_ £_
, O OJ O

O3 *"" 4-3 3
O 4-5 O 4-3

e O— Q f~
03 O Z. O
^~
3 *"•* c"
i — IO • O
1 	 1— I CO •!-
0)^- £_ 4->
O O 03
48 ^.^ E
03 CM > O
Q. £_ If-
QJ C 3 C
n: ••— co «r-




o
E

oo
t-i



E
Q-
Q-

CD
LO

t_
O

LO
C\J

-o
O)
<^
o
0)
Q-
CO
±1
O
•z.
•z.
to
"^^
r^
CD
1 —
LO
0



















!*-
O
•
OJ -O
E OJ
•f~~ 4-5
4-5 g~
0)
~O t/)
c: 
O 03
c oj
•r~ ~O











































J3
LO
CO
• •>tn
03 ^H
CO
i — »
en «<
1-H ^
UJ
<\
o •
Q CO
Qi •
i— i !3



T3
C 1 4-> . — -
03 O 03 £-
4-> OJ
LO O3 CO J3
CM O. 03 3
OJ E OJ
4-> -C O Qi
03 C •—-
• «s *r«-
to^^ o E
OJ O £- Q-
i— Q 03 Q-
3 a: o
"O ^~^ C^
O 	 C- LO
C 03
E i— T3
£- Q. 3 C
a> a.,— 03
> 1—
•i— CD OJ LO
— ! LO O CM




o
E

oo
r-H






£_
o

** E
LO Q-
CM Q-

«O
LO LO



1 '

oQ

SI
CD
0





t-)

Q
^ 4-— *3R





03
r~.
p.^
cy*
r— 1

n
i — i .
CJ


CO CO
03 a;
E r—
O 03
c E
••- OJ
0 4-

03 T5
O f~
03
C_
03 CO
<— OJ
3 t—
t— 03
r— E
0)
0 -C

03 ja
o.
OJ c
:c -r- c
o
+j •
(O
>
\^ vx f
5 co 5 OJ
3 CO
0 r— 0 -Q
00 Q-r-H 0



1 1
CM 00
• •
CO CO
LO 10

og ,03

CT> t— 1
e •
CT> O
CM CO




u_

oS

^
CD
LO


t-H
U_
CO
e ^
IO



03
CO
OO
O">
t— <

«
1—

co
<
i — i
OL



CO LO
03 •

O rH
C
a> c
"O **"
03
CO
C (Q
03 E
•— O
3 '^~
r— CD
i— C
OJ 03
0 E
4-> JC
03
CL-0
OJ C
a: 03




o
E

<*
CM







£_ £
0 Q.
Q.
V,
LO LO
e
"CM
r-l i— 1




U_

08

^ '
O
oo





a:
o
i — i
















t_
OJ
> LO
•r- CO
r— 4-> OJ
03 c—
t_ 03
O CO E '
E OJ
3 r— T3
4-J 03 C
c E 03
O OJ
c 4- E
a.
•"CO.
CO -r-
OJ LO E
i — CO . CL
E O i— I
•i- LO
E to -a
Q- OJ C 4->
a.!— 03 03












































-------
                 O>
                 o

                 O>  O>
                 t-  o
                 O)  t-
                 M-  3
                 0>  O
                 o;  to
Ul
0£
o

oc
o

Oi
o
u.
CO
o
5
Ul
CD
o

              O 3  (O
              •r- tO  >
              +J O  t_
              (00.0)
              <- X  tO
              3 o> ja
              o     o
                 tO  CL
                 o  o.
                 Q-—
                     X
                     O)
                     to
                     CO
                               to
                               o  as
                               (- 00
                                               CM
                                               LO
                 O>

                 Dl
                               O)  O O)
                              +J -I- >
                               (O  to O
                               c:  > (O
                               CO -r-
                               E i— E
                              4->     O-
                               (O  ••> Q.
                               0)  to
                               t-  S_ O
                              +j  o co

                               O  3 +J
 to
 %
•a
o
CD
   ot
  "CM O.
o oo

     "CO
  •>O CM
O VO ^-1
CM r-l
                                  OO«3
                                                      "O
                                                      0)
                                                      to
                 U  CL  I
                 •I-  0.4-J
                 x     cz
                 O O 01
                 •»-> O E co
                    00 4J t-.
                 ^:     (O o
                 oi-a o) E
                 •r-  c: t- 3
 £_
 >>

CM
                                                 •> E
                                               00.
                                               oo a.
                 o o



                 LO  O
                                                                   r-
                                                                   a>
                                                                   o
                                     CO
                                     CL
                                     3     O
                                     O    T-
                                     C-    +->
                                     en c co
                                                                                                    oo
                                                                                                    oo
                                                                      CO
                                                                                        co
                                                                                        cu
                    i—  >> o. > i— o .e





                     *~  4->     O         C r—
                     >, t_  •     O) O) T-  (O
                    4J  O CO  tO  CO i—     E
                    •r-EO>O)OJ2tOO)

                    •r—  JS E-O  Sco  E"O
                     OT-OJOOO3C
                    I—  x:«»-  c: i— Q.+J  to
           c
           o


 5  = 3  *
o i— cr>  t-
oo  O-CM  o>
           co
                     c   i  c  o.
                     (O  E (O  O-

                    uo  o-co LO
                      .       .   .
                    oo  r^ o 1-1
                    o  o CM •* i
                    CM  «d- i-l CM
                                                      CO
                                                      to
                                                      E     co  co
                                                      o     c  a> jc
                                                      c ••> o   o>
                                                      O) CO •!-  O •!-
                                   +J C E

                                 ,— -O  «3        t«-
                                  O)  i  i—  t- to

                                  O CT>  O  >|—T-
                                  +j -i-  o> -r- 
                                  Q-    c:        co
                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                     oo
                                                                                                     t-
                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                       *• a.
                                                                                                     LOO.
                                                                                                       l CM
                              LO
                                I
                              oo
                                               o
                                               CM
                                                a>
                                               •o
                                                c
                                                a>
                                                c
                                                c_
                                                o

                                                CO
                                               o
                                                            4-36
                                     o
                                     LO
                                                                    O)
                                                                   •a
                                                                    O)
                                      o>
                                      c:
                                      c_
                                      o
                                     ja
                                      CO
                                     o
                                                      o
                                                      co
                                                                                                     oo
                                                                                                      o>
                                                                                                      o
                                                                                                      CO

-------
of 25 or 50 ppm (approximately 3.57 or 7.14 mg/kg bw) for 18 months.  Specific
information as to treatment and observation periods and time of death was not
provided.  The C57B1/6N mouse rarely develops spontaneous liver lesions and in
a group of 200 control mice no liver tumors or nodular lesions were found over
18 months of observation.  In mice receiving the chlordane/heptachlor diet,
many liver lesions were seen, including both benign proliferative lesions and
hepatocellular carcinomas.  Of those surviving to the end of the experiment,
27 percent (16 mice) had primary hepatocellular carcinomas, with the first
appearing at 36 weeks.  No other information was presented as tO'early deaths
and associated tumor incidences.  An even greater number of mice had benign
proliferative lesions.  Data relating tumor incidence to dose were not avail-
able.  Elevated levels of alpha-fetoprotein were associated with animals with
primary hepatocellular carcinomas.  Cells from the carcinomas grew when trans-
planted, producing tumors that were histologically similar to the primary
hepatocellular carcinoma.  Cells from the benign lesions did not grow when
transplanted.  The authors concluded that the benign lesions did not* appear to
be premalignant lesions.
     In a companion study, acetylaminofluorene was administered to the same
strain of mice (C57B1/6N) at 0.045 or 0.03 percent diet.  After 61 weeks, seven
(18 percent)  of the survivors had liver carcinomas, and three showed growth at
2.4 to 4 months when transplanted.  On a comparison basis, chlordane was con-
sidered to be a more potent carcinogen than acetylaminofluorene.   Another key
finding in this study was that chlordane induced hepatocellular carcinomas in a
strain of mice that does not spontaneously develop hepatocellular carcinomas.
     4.4.1.1.1.2.   The International  Research and Development Corporation
(IRDC. 1973a).   IRDC, under contract to the Velsicol  Chemical Corporation,
administered  analytical  grade chlordane in the diet at concentrations  of 0,  5,
                                      4-37

-------
25, or 50 ppra (approximately 0, 0.71, 3.57, or 7.14 mg/kg bw)  for 18 months  to
groups of 100 male and 100 female CD-I mice.  The mice were 6  weeks of age when
exposure began.  A 6-month interim sacrifice of 10 mice/sex/group did not
reveal compoundrelated lesions.  No effect of chlordane on body weight gain  or
food consumption was observed.  However, the survival  was greatly reduced at
the high-dose levels.  A large number of animals were also lost due to autoly-
sis.  Only about one-half of the mice were histologically examined.  A dose-
related increased incidence of hepatocytomegaly was seen in all treated female
and male groups.  The incidence of hyperplastic liver nodules, as reported by
IRDC  (1973a), was dose-related at the two highest dose levels (p < 0.01).  For
males, the incidences were:  1/47 (2 percent), 34/52  (65 percent), and 38/50
(76 percent) at 0, 25, and 50  ppm, respectively, whereas for females, the
incidences were 0/57  (0 percent), 32/51  (63 percent), and 36/51  (71 percent),
respectively.  The number of hepatornas was  higher,  although not  statistically
at p  - 0.05, in the  25 ppm group  (12) vs. that in the control (5) or 5 ppm
groups (6).  Only four hepatomas  were diagnosed  at  50 ppm; however, early
deaths and a large amount of autolysis markedly  reduced  the number of mice at
risk.  Dr. Reuber (U.S. EPA, 1985b)  reexamined the  IRDC  slides and found  highly
significant  (p < 1 x 10"9) incidences of hepatic carcinoma rather than hyper-
plastic  nodules at the 25 and  50  mg/kg diet levels.   Three other independent
pathologists  (Drs. R.  Squire,  H.  Stewart,  and H. Popper)  examined  subsets of
the  same slides examined  by Reuber and were in close  agreement with the  diagno-
sis.   Table  7  presents  a  breakdown of liver lesions as  diagnosed by  Reuber.
The  incidences  of hepatic carcinoma, as  determined  by Reuber,  are  presented  in
Table 8, along with  those  found  in the  NCI study to be  discussed next.
      4.4.1.1.1.3.   National Cancer  Institute  (1977a).  In  the  NCI  bioassay,
 groups of 50 male  and 50  female  B6C3F1  mice were fed  chlordane consisting of

                                       4-38

-------
 TABLE 7.  INCIDENCE OF LIVER LESIONS AND TUMORS IN CD-I MICE FOLLOWING DIETARY
                         ADMINISTRATION OF CHLORDANE
Dose
(ppm)
0
5
25
50
Sex
M
F
r>
M
F
M
F
No. of mice
examined
33
45
55
61
52
50
39
37
No. of mice exhibiting liver
H
20(61)
26(58)
34(62)
32(52)
7(13)
13(26)
7(18)
11(30)
N
1(3)
0
6(11)
1(2)
3(6)
4(8)
0
0
SC
0
0
3(5)
0
9(17)
7(14)
4(10)
2(5)
lesions and tumorsa
LC
3(9)
0
2(4)
0
32(62)
25(50)
28(72)
24(65)
TC
3(9)hw'
5(9)
0
41(79)
32(64)
32(82)
26(70)
aH = hyperplasia; N = nodules; SC = small  carcinomas (including hyperplastic
 nodules with focal carcinomas); LC = large carcinomas >_ 5 mm;  TC = total
 carcinomas.
bTwo liver sarcomas diagnosed in the 5 ppm female group.

SOURCE:   IRDC, 1973a; breakdown of liver lesions diagnosed by Reuber (U.S.  EPA,
         1985b).
                                      4-39

-------
       TABLE 8.  INCIDENCE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA IN MICE FOLLOWING
                  CHRONIC DIETARY ADMINISTRATION OF CHLORDANE
                                No. of tumor-bearing mice/no,  ofmice examined
                                                 (% Positive)	
   Dose
   (ppm)
   Male
 Female
Strain CD-la

     0
     5
    25
    50

Strain B6C3Flb
 3/33 (9%)
 5/55 (9%)
41/52 (79%)
32/39 (82%)
' 0/45  (0%)
 0/61  (0%)
32/50  (64%)
26/37  (70%)
0 (pooled)
0 (matched)
29.9
30.1
56.2
63.8
17/92 (18%)
2/18 (11%)
16/48 (33%)
NA
43/49 (88%)
NA
3/78 (4%)
0/19 (0%)
NAC
3/47 (6%)
NA
34/49 (69%)
aIRDC, 1973a; tumor incidence as determined by Reuber.  Tumor incidences
 significantly different from controls for 25 and 50 ppm in the diet
 (p < 1 X 10-9) (U.S. EPA, 1985b).
bNCI (1977a); dose-related trend significant at p < 0.0001.
CNA - Not applicable.
                                      4-40

-------
71.7 percent cis-chlordane, 23.1 percent trans-chlordane, 0.3 percent hepta-
chlor, 0.6 percent nonachlor, 1.1 percent hexachlorocyclopentadiene, and 0.25
percent chlordene isomers in the diet for 80 weeks, at two doses—a predicted
maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and 1/2 MTD.  This was followed by a 10-week ob^,
                                      !                                   ^ -*fa ;
servation period.  As upward or downward adjustments were made in dose levels,
the doses are expressed as time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations.  Ttie;f!\IA
concentrations for male mice at the high dose and low dose were 29.9 and 56.2
ppm (approximately 4.27 and 8.03 mg/kg bw), respectively, and 30.1 and 63.8 ppm
(approximately 4.3 and 9.11 mg/kg bw), respectively, for female mice.  Controls
consisted of 20 matched control mice of each sex and 100 and 80 pooled male and
female control mice, respectively.  The results revealed no differences ijn body
weight gain among groups.  Tremors were observed in high-dose males and females
                                                                           ?•"•
after 20 weeks.  A dose-related increase in mortality was seen in treated
males, but not in females.  A statistically higher (p < 0.001) incidence of
               .                           •                            •'*'.•'•-•
hepatocellular carcinoma was found in both males and females (Table 8). -I   ;-;  •
     4.4.1.1.1.4.  Research Institute for Animal Science in Biochemistry -and
Toxicology, Japan (RIASBT, 1983a).  In this study, conducted for the Velsicol
Chemical Corporation (1983b), technical  grade chlordane (distribution of iso-
mers not specified) was fed to groups of 80 male and 80 female ICR mice at
levels of 0, 1, 5, or 12.5 ppm (approximately 0, 0.14, 0.71, of 1.79 mg/kg bw)
for a period of 24 months.
     Each group (sex and dose level) consisted of 80 mice of which 8 were sac-
rificed at 52 weeks.   There was no apparent effect of dosing on survival  or
body weight gain.  The mean liver weight was significantly increased for the
eight males receiving 12.5 ppm sacrificed at 52 weeks, and the liver-to-body
weight ratios were significantly increased for all  dosed groups of males when
compared with controls.   At terminal sacrifice (104 weeks), the mean weight
                                      4-41

-------
and organ-to-body weight ratio of the liver were  statistically significantly
increased in both males and females receiving 12.5  ppm.   In  addition, the
liver-to-body weight ratios of females receiving  1  and  5  ppm chlordane were
statistically significantly greater than in controls.
     A significant increase (p < 0.001) in the incidence  of  hepatocellular
adenoma and hemangioma of the liver was found in  the 12.5 ppm male  group  in
animals dying between 19 and 24 months or at terminal  sacrifice,  as described
in Table 9.  There was no increase in hepatic tumors in female mice.  Other
than for the liver tumors in male mice, there were  no significant differences
in tumors at other sites related to chlordane exposure.
     In addition to liver tumors, there were remarkable increases in liver
lesions.  There were also significant increases (p  < 0.01) in the incidence  of
hepatocellular swelling, degeneration, and necrosis in males at  5 and 12.5  ppm
and a significant increase (p < 0.01) in fatty degeneration at 12.5 ppm.   A
significant increase (p < 0.001) in hepatocellular  swelling and  degeneration
was found in females at doses of 5 and 12.5 ppm.   In summary, these liver
lesions were observed after 12 months:  dose-related increased incidences of
hepatocellular swelling and degeneration;  fatty degeneration; and necrosis in
the livers of males, with a less distinct  trend in  females.
4.4.1.1.2.  Studies with Rats.
     4.4.1.1.2.1.  Ambrose et al.  (1953a,  b).  In this study, technical  grade
chlordane was fed to groups of three  to five male and female albino rats for
400 days at dietary levels of 0, 10,  20, 40, 80, 160, 320,  640, or 1280 ppm
(approximately 0, 0.5,  1.0, 2.0, 4.0,  8.0,  32.0, or 64.0 mg/kg bw).  Increased
mortality was observed  in the 640  or  1280  ppm  groups, and retarded growth was
observed in all  animals at ^320  ppm.   No growth retardation was observed in
female  rats fed _<160 ppm or  in male  rats  fed  10 or 80  ppm.  Significantly

                                       4-42

-------

UJ
2:

Q
a:
0
_j
n:
°
Q
UJ
U_

LLJ
o
•—1
SI
a;
o
i — i
— ^
i^
i — i
cv
UJ
>
H- (
_J
UJ
n:
I —
u_
o

co
o
1— H
CO
UJ
_J

o
i — i
X
0
1 —

a:
o

Q

^f

O
i — i
i —
co

	 i
0-
0
UJ
z:


•
Cn

UJ
	 1
CG


q-
O

•
O


re
i — 1 i — 1 CD Cn Cn O
LO CM






re
co o I-H . -=d- en LO
CM i-l




i-H O CM CM CM 00



I-H O O CO T-H «i-
I— 1





re re re f^ re
oo en ^~ en en en
CM i— 1 LO i-H

' .


re .a
LO 1 — OO OO CO CO
T— 1 LO CM



(


co co t— i oo co r-
r-H






CO CO «=*• LO CM tO
r— 1







1
en
re re c:
E E ••-
O O r—
C C r—
01 co co c c:
-a -o S o o
re re co -i— •!—
•)-> -p
- ' • -c_ . 't_ £_ re re
re re re t_ t-
r— r— i— CO CO
3 3 re 3 c c:
r— i— E  +->t_ C 4->T3 >> O
re rere re rec +-> £-
Q. Q-O E CLre 4-> O
a> co co cu re co
3C Z 3r 3C U_ 'Z.











•' f"*t


3fn-'"


'f


T-H
o
o
0
V

a.
• - •-. ';
CO
3
r— •
re «*"-^ . " ;
o
r— •
O O : • .
£_.
4-> V
C
0 CL .
O ••— ^ o
CO
E CO OO
O 3 CTl
£- , — ,— <
t- re
> **
i ^ - • • 'f—
c i— ' o
CO O •!-
£_ C- +J
co +-> re
> o c_>
r- (-
4J 4- •—
c re
re 4-» o
0 C -r-
•r- 0) E
<<- i- CO
•r- CO ^:
CM- O
CD 4 — ^
•r— *r- r~-
co -a o
tjt
^> **^ "I-"
i — i — to
r— 4-^ 'r~~
re c co
o re >
•r- O
•»-> ••-
t/i<»- ••
••- •!- UJ
-M C O
re CD a;
^ •!- =3
oo co c5
re .a co
4-43

-------
enlarged livers and other liver changes were found in  male and  female  rats  fed
chlordane at 21 80 ppm, and pathologic changes in the liver was  occasionally
found in male rats fed 40 ppm.  No treatment-related increase in  tumors  was
found.  The study duration (400 days) is considered too short and the  number
of animals too small for this to be a valid carcinogenicity study.
     4.4.1.1.2.2.  Ingle (1952).  Six groups of 20 male and 20  female  Osborne-
Mendel rats were fed chlordane for up to 2 years at dietary dose  levels  of  5,
10, 30, 150, or 300 ppm (approximately 0.25, 0.5, 1.5, 7.5, or  15.0 mg/kg bw).
Harked toxicity was encountered at 300 ppm in both males and females.  This
included high mortality, reduced growth rates, eye and nose hemorrhaging, and
severe histopathologic damage to the liver, kidneys, heart, adrenals,  lungs,
myocardium, and spleen.  At 150 ppm, similar but less  severe effects were seen.
The effects at 30 ppm included inducible tremors and slight liver damage.   At
10 ppm, only minor liver damage, such as occasional hepatocytomegaly and mild
bile duct hyperplasia, was seen.  No symptoms of toxicity, gross  or histopatho-
logic changes in the liver, kidneys, lungs, pancreas,  testes, ovaries, heart,
or spleen were noted at 5 ppm.  No treatment-related tumor incidence was found.
     4.4.1.1.2.3.  National Cancer Institute (1977a).   In the NCI carcinogeni-
city study, groups of 50 male and 50 female Osborne-Mendel rats were fed chlor-
dane (94.8 percent pure) in the diet for 80 weeks, at  two dose levels—a pre-
dicted MTD and 1/2 MTD.  This was followed by a 29-week observation period.
As upward or downward adjustments were made in dose levels, the doses  are
expressed as TWA concentrations.  The TWA concentrations for male rats at the
low dose and high dose were 203.5 and 407 ppm (approximately 10.2 and  20.4
mg/kg bw), respectively, for males, and 120.8 and 241.5 ppm (approximately  6.04
and 12.08 mg/kg bw), respectively, for females.  Ten rats of each sex  served  as
matched controls, and 60 rats of each sex served as pooled controls.  Complete

                                      4-44

-------
necropsies and histologic examinations were performed, except in the cases of
a few spontaneous deaths.
     The mean body weight of high-dose males and females was consistently lower
than controls.  All treated groups had symptoms of toxicity, including loss of
body weight, rough and discolored hair, palpable masses, and tumors, that
became progressively worse as the study continued.  Among female rats, there
was a highly significant (p = 0.003) dose-related increase in mortality.   Mor-
tality was not significantly increased for male rats.  Only two hepatocellular
carcinomas were observed, one in a low-dose male and one among the pooled con-
trols.  A significant (p < 0.05) increase in neoplastic nodules of the liver
was seen in the low-dose females but not in the high-dose females or in either
the high- or low-dose males.  A dose-related trend (p < 0.05) was found for
neoplastic lesions (adenomas and carcinomas) of the thyroid glands (follicular
cell and C-cells) for females when compared with the matched controls.  However,
the results were ambiguous and internally inconsistent.  NCI discounted the
importance of these findings because the incidences were comparatively low and/
or were known to be variable in populations of control rats.
     In a more recent review of tumors in Osborne-Mendel rats in the NCI  stu-
dies (over 900 of each sex), Goodman et al. (1980) presented data indicating
7.1 percent follicular cell  tumors in control  males and 3.4 percent in control
females.  These data provide additional support for NCI's decision to discount
the importance of apparent increase in thyroid tumors.  A highly significant
dose-related increase in the incidence of fibrous histiocytoma (p = 0.0007)  was
observed for male rats.   This was based on  an  increase only in the high-dose
male group (7/44) as compared to 1/44, 0/8, and 2/58 for the low-dose, matched
control, and pooled control  groups, respectively.   The investigators discounted
this finding because they did not believe these lesions to be treatment-related,

                                      4-45

-------
as they had occurred spontaneously throughout the bioassay  program.  All other
tumors were common for this strain of rat,  and were not  treatment-related.
     4.4.1.1.2.4.  The Research Institute for Animal  Science  in  Biochemistry
and Toxicology, Japan (RIASBT, 1983b).   In  this study, conducted for the Vel-
sicol Chemical Corporation, chlordane (distribution of isomers not  specified)
was fed to groups of 80 male and 80 female  Fischer 344 rats at levels  of 0, 1,
5, or 25 ppm (approximately 0, 0.5, 0.25, or 1.25 mg/kg  bw) for  a period of 130
weeks.  Each group (sex and dose level)  consisted of 80  rats, of which subsets
of eight rats were sacrificed and studied at 26 and 52 weeks. The  dose levels
were set on the basis of a pilot study in which groups of 5 male and 5 female
Fischer 344 rats were fed diets containing  0, 50, 100, 200, 400, or 800 ppm
technical grade chlordane for 4 weeks.   Hepatocellular swelling  and fatty
degeneration in the liver were found in  both male and female  rats at 50 ppm,
the lowest dose tested.  One ppm was set as the no-effect level, based on  an
18-month study in mice (provided by Velsicol) in which changes in.the  liver
were evidenced at 5 ppm chlordane.
     In the 130-week study, there were no dose-related effects on mortality,
food consumption, water consumption, hematology, clinical chemistry, or uri-
nalysis.  Virtually all of the toxic effects were restricted  to  the liver.
     The weight of the liver in females receiving 25 ppm was  significantly
increased at weeks 26 and 52 but not at week 130, whereas in  males receiving
5 and 25 ppm, the liver weight was increased at week 130 but  not at the 26-  or
52-week sacrifice.
     At necropsy, enlargement of the liver was noted in  19 control  males  and  19,
26,  and 32 males dosed at 1, 5, and 25 ppm, respectively.  Table 10 presents
the  tumor and nontumor lesions of the liver.  There was  a significant  increase
in adenomas of the liver in males receiving 25 ppm as compared  to controls,  but

                                      4-46

-------
re
UJ
z

o
Qi
O

n:
o

O
UJ
U-

oo
«=C
o;

00
a:
UJ

0
oo
i — i
LJU.
Z
1— 1
GO
z
o
1— f
oo
UJ
_J

o
h— 1
I—
GO
<£.
	 1
Q-
O
UJ

^y
o


o
z


oo
on
o

1 —

i*s
UJ

i — t
_i


•
o


UJ

CO
«=c
1-
















"^— X
E
Q.
O.
~_-

Ol
to
o
Q
**•»
CU

E
u.




LO
CM






LO






i— 1




O










^-^
£
CL
Q.


O)
to
O
Q

CO
CU

re








LO
CM






LO







1







O
































^*
LO






^~
IJD





^~
vo



^^»
IO






^J-
to






^^
to






^^
to






^«
tO





-o
CU
c
•i—
pS
re
X
CU

t/>
CU
3
to
(/)
•^
[ ^

M-
o

•
o
z


f*l
O O CO i-H CM i— 1
CO






O O CO i— I Ol i-<
f— 1





CM O CM O VO O
t— 1 i-H



o o r~ o o LO
OJ





JD -Q J3
CTl CM CM I--- CM r-H
«* CM CM i-H






co I-H ^c I-H cn co
I— 1 t— 1 1— 1





o o o
^H CO LO OO LO I-*
i— 1 i-H i-l






^H O LO OO  tO
re c •!-
e .1- to
0 •— 0 >> t-
c: i — t_ +j re
CU CU O •!-» i—
T3 S o> re 3
re v> c M- i —
P_
C- t_ £- £_ C CU
re re re re o u re
i — re i — i— i — •!— o •>—
3 E 3 3 3+J 4->tO
^-* o ^— r-~ r— re re re
i— E r— r— i— t- O.r—
CU >> CU CU CU CU CU *"*
O J= O O OC J=£-
O O O O O CU CU
-|J c: ^ 4-> 4-> CD i — Q.
re cu re re re cu re ^)
Q- CO Q. Q. Q.-O O J=
CU CU CU CU CU O
3i s: IE a: DC u.


























.
•o
0)
T3
3 •
r— ^"^* •
O ^H *-%'
C 0 LO
•i- O 0
• • '
•POO
o
C V V

cu a. o. •
c. — *^~* re
re co
cu cu co
CJ 3 3 CT>
LO r— r— i-H
re re
-o > > •>
c c:
re ^— i — o
00 •!-
10 t- t- 4J
CM 4-3 4-3 re
c c: t_
to O O O
J>i O O Q.
flj £_
CU E E O
S 0 0 0
£_ £_
4-> 4- , >, -r-
I — i— tO
tO 4-> 4-> i—
i— c c cu
re re re ^*
E o o
•r— >r— •r0
C  ai a;
-E -i- •!- =3
H- 00 CO O
re ja o oo
4-47

-------
no corresponding effect occurred in females.   All  of these  tumors were  found
after 104 weeks (mean time to tumor death was 121.8 weeks).   There  was  also a
significant increase in fibroadenomas of the  mammary gland  in females receiving
1 ppm as compared to controls but no significant increase at  5 or 25 ppm.
     Nonneoplastic lesions occurred frequently.   There was  a  dose-related  in-
    "i                                                         ' '  " ' ,  >         '
crease in the incidence of hepatocellular swelling and necrosis  in  male rats.
When compared to controls, the incidence of hepatocellular  swelling was signi- ,
ficantly increased in all  dosed males, and the incidence of hepatocellular
necrosis was significantly increased in males receiving 1 and 25 ppm.   The
incidence of hepatocellular swelling was significantly higher in females re-
ceiving 25 ppm than in controls.  There was also an increase  in  focal hepato-
cellular hyperplasia in males receiving 25 ppm,  but the increase was not sig-
nificantly different compared to controls. Most of these lesions of the liver
occurred after 78 weeks of the study.  A slight  increase in nonneoplastic  liver
lesions was seen in the 26- and 52-week sacrifice groups (Table 11).
     Chlordane was considered positive for oncogenicity by  the authors, since
the incidence of hepatic adenomas was significantly increased (p <  0.001)  in
males in the 25 ppm group (9/64 versus 1/64 in controls).   The historical
incidence of this tumor in F344/CRJ rats for  the testing laboratory was 2.5
percent in males and 2.3 percent in females.   The control incidence in  this
study was 1.6 percent.
     An independent review of the liver histopathology, conducted by Dr. Gary
M. Williams, differed somewhat in that three  of  the neoplasms of the liver,
identified as adenomas by the report authors, were diagnosed  as carcinomas by
Dr. Williams.  In addition, three neoplasms (adenomas) were found that  were
not diagnosed by the testing laboratory (Table 12).  It was noted that  only
two slices of liver, one from the median lobe and one from  the left lobe,  were
                                      4-48

-------
 TABLE 11.   LIVER LESIONS IN FISCHER 344 RATS FED CHLORDANE FOR 26 OR 52 WEEKS3
Lesion 0
26 weeks
Hepatocel lular fatty 0
degeneration
Focal necrosis 0
Bile duct proliferation 0
52 weeks
Hepatocel lular fatty 0
degeneration
Hepatocel lular swelling 0
Focal necrosis 0
Bile duct proliferation 0
Small granuloma 0
aLivers from eight rats/group were
Males/Dose (ppm)
1 5 25
001
0 00
0 0 1
201
002
0 11
000
0 00
examined.
Females/Dose
015
0 0 1
-• >.
010
1 00
000
0 1 0
0 1 0
001
0 0 1

(ppm)
25
I-' , y'i
0
' 3t.t •
0
... . 1
0
3
•'•"1 •
0
• -'£•
• - ' ! !-•
SOURCE: Velsicol Chemical Corporation (1983a).
TABLE 12. LIVER NEOPLASMS
Neopl asm
Adenoma
Carcinoma
Total neoplasms
IN MALE FISCHER 344 RATS
Dose (ppm)
015
lb 1 4
lb 0 0
2 1 4
FED CHLORDANE3

25
8k '
2-b
10C

• • . :
;- -i-.-


^Pathology by Gary M. Williams, M.D., dated March 9, 1984.
"One animal had both an adenoma and carcinoma.
cSignificantly different from control value (p£0.05).

SOURCE:  Velsicol Chemical Corporation (1983a).
                                      4-49

-------
taken from rats without grossly observed tumors, and Dr. Williams felt that  the
number of neoplasms might have increased had more sections been evaluated.   In
his opinion, the small increase in benign liver neoplasms was considered as
weak evidence for the oncogenicity of chlordane in rats.
     The increased incidence of mammary fibroadenomas in females receiving  1
ppm chlordane was not considered to be compound/dose related because mammary
fibroadenomas were absent in females dosed at higher levels.
     Nonneoplastic changes in the liver of both males and females were increased
in dosed animals compared to controls.  The principal changes consisted of  hepa-
tocellular swelling and necrosis.  The liver changes were accompanied by an
increase in liver weights in males receiving 5 and 25 ppm at 130 weeks and  in
females receiving 25 ppm at weeks 26 and 52.
     It was concluded that, under the conditions of the study, technical grade
chlordane caused a significant increase in the incidence of benign hepatocell-
ular tumors when fed at a level of 25 ppm in the diet to male F344 rats for 130
weeks.  There was also a significant increase in nonneoplastic lesions of the
liver in both male and female rats; namely, an increased incidence of hepato-
cellular swelling in males receiving 1, 5, or 25 ppm and in females receiving
25 ppm.  In addition, there was a significant increase in hepatocellular necro-
sis in males receiving 1 or 25 ppm, but no corresponding effect occurred in
females.  The histologic changes in the liver were accompanied by increased
liver weights in males at 130 weeks (5 and 25 ppm groups) and females receiving
25 ppm at weeks 26 and 52.  A NOEL and LOEL for chronic toxicity in females
based on nonneoplastic changes in the liver are 5 ppm and 25 ppm, respectively;
the LOEL in males is 1 ppm.
4.4.1.1.3.  Other Species.
     4.4.1.1.3.1.  Wazeter (1967).  In this unpublished study, Wazeter, as  cited
                                      4-50

-------
in Vettorazzi (1975), performed a chronic study with dogs that were fed a diet
containing chlordane at levels of 0, 0.3, 3, 15, or 30 ppm (approximately 0,
0.008, 0.075, 0.375, or 0.75 mg/kg bw)  for 2 years.  Increased liver weight and
histologic changes in the liver were reported along with a NOEL of 3 ppm.   No
tumors were reported.  The study duration (2 years) is considered inadequate
for a carcinogenicity assay in dogs.
4.4.1.2.  Heptachlor—Heptachlor has been studied in three mouse and five rat
long-term carcinogenesis bioassays; Tables 13 and 14 present a summary of the
experimental design and tumor results for these studies.  One long-term chronic
study using dogs has also been conducted.  These studies are described in more
detail in the following sections.
                                                                        ' .- : '-I'"'. ". •
4.4.1.2.1.  Studies with Mice.
     4.4.1.2.1.1.  The Food and Drug Administration (Davis, 1965)—The carcino-
genicity of heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide (purity not specified) was studied
using groups of 100 male and 100 female C3H mice fed a diet mixture containing
0 or 10 ppm (approximately 1.43 mg/kg bw) for 2 years.  Survival was generally
low:  50 percent of the controls, 30 percent of the heptachlor-treated, and
9.5 percent of the heptachlor epoxide-treated mice survived the 2-year period;
early deaths were due to tumors.  FDA pathologists found a two-fold increase
in benign liver lesions (hepatic hyperplasia and benign tumors) in the treated
animals over the controls, although'the incidence of malignant liver tumors.was
less (Table 15).
     A revaluation was performed by Reuber (1977b), resulting in a change in
diagnosis for many benign tumors to liver carcinomas.  Hepatic carcinomas in the
treated groups were generally large, especially in the epoxide groups, and were
frequently multiple, in contrast to carcinomas in control groups, which were
smaller and solitary.  The incidences of liver carcinoma are presented in Table
16.
                                      4-51

-------
                               Lf>
LJLJ
                      0>
                      O
                      OI
                      t_
                      cu
                      O)
                                   CO
                                   CT>
                  CO Q-
                 O LU
                                                                 o
                                                                 o
                                                                 o;
                                                                                             O)
                                                                                             o
                                                                                             co LLJ
                                                                                             o>
                                                                                             O>
                                                                                  oo
                                                                                                   OO
o
                               eC (O  O)
                               Q E r—
                               U- O  

> i— 'io
                                          (13  
                 CQ ^: -
                                          O)
                                                           a>
                        (0 O
                        O.J3
                        0)
                                                                               O) •!-
                                                                                      O)
                                                             COO)
                                                             •r- jQ  Qi
                                                                                             
a.   i—
d) 4->  fO
LU
 C  OJ 4->
 O  t- CO
•I-  3 >
4J  tO C_

 CO  O OJ
 C-  Q. to

 3  X J3
Q  CD O
                                                        3     •!-
                                                       i—     -!-»
                        350)
                               to
                       o o .o
                       oo «-<  o
                                                                                   CO
                                                                                   >
                                                                               o  t-
                                                                               00 JQ
                                                                               r-t  O
                                                           E oo
LU
LU
CO
                                         •o
                                          c:  Q.
                                          co
                           oo
                        —I   •
                         • oo
                                                              •o u.
                                                              c.  i
                                                              CO  E
                                                                               CO
                                                                 LO  Q-

                                                                   «O
co
                     
-------






UJ
o
H-H

o
UJ

Oi
0
o
1
^
UJ
T"

Q

fit

oi
o
1

^<
1 —
Q-
UJ
3:
^yf
O
u_
oo
r~ "
oo
UJ

>_
1—
1— 1
o
i — i

UJ

o
i — t
QZ
o

>_
(•V
•=C
1 1 1
I-H
0
1
t^
oc

u_
0

>_
C£

SI
S

OO
.
1— 1
UJ
_]
co















+-) 00 i_
(TJ O CU
I- CL 01
3 X -Q.
a QJ o





O)
to
O
Q









X

CO

9
O






C
(r-
03
£_
j i
oo
r-^ r-^ «=C
•t * O3 o3 D-
. ,__ UJ
,— 03 4-> 4->
ro O) O) •
ja 40 OO
4_j t~- Old) C7> Q- O> Q- «
0 £ .= >,=£ = E =
^_ ^H t_O<£> .)->•!— LO-P'i-LOOO
O5 CTi C_ 5 QJ "~3 CTi (U IS O"> Cl) 13 C7l C7l
0 r-l Z i^- 	 rH V:^-'ii-l ^ 	 r-l i-l

<1) t-
CO O)
• n ••v-Q O3 • « > OO
CO +J tO C O) '-^ •!- 03
"O ^O3 ^.03 t- CT> r~* E
a> o o o c o
+jto co E<" Er— CT-CC
o3t- 3 -i-t-T-T-
r^- O • *> r— '^~ 4-^ O > 4-* 4-^ CD O
CU E Ol 3 • *» *H~ O O3 T3 4-* d) ^
t_3 t_"o-atoco ctoja c a>4->coCL)03U

cc 3 OE ai-oaio i— •• — S-TS
OJ.I- 4->O.'O'-3 COt-C tO-r- CU OC
E -r— O) CT>4-) O3CUO3 (13 to C-(/)c:o3
4_> Q.) f | ^ [ % QJ > QJ CU 1 ^- *^ **~^
O3co CUtoo3i — -aw *-•>-£ '-i — QJO cot-
OJ03 >o3QJO-i-QJ Or— O. O E lOE4->aJOJ
t_a> •!- 1— t_ t_ o r— c: a. crt-o. o 3 j= i— JD
[ % t ^M r^ ] % | * t fl3 »r— QJ "^ OJ f*^ T3 4-> O^ 3 3
O O C >> E E LO > *^ TD CU
oc o cu c: o -C cu oo. o-i— o ocr— ooi
Z-r- 2:CT-04J,4-> 03 IO 03 ^t ^
r— > 0 > 5 S
•r— CO C- r-l ^d ^: i- S-
030JQJ StO^QJ >> O OO
^O t^ t/) i— 3 ^0 ^^ t: J
^5 ^^ ^D v^ ^^ ^^ f^ jQ ^SJ T™"! t"")
LO T3 O M- 3 OO Q.CO O


.1.
S u. 00. « E E
, — . II i— 1 LO O. •> « Q.
CDIO -OET3E LO O. LOLOQ.
\y CD C O- C O- « . « . .
^^ to O3 Q_ O3 O_ LO OJ CO O CXI 1 — O
U) O • » — I » — ' *"*
E ~o CT* o^ r^- oo r*^ ** « «
. . . .' "O LO "O LO O "O
OLO oo r~- LO «— t "C «c: ..c
t— 1 	 OOr-~CVlLO LOO3 T-HO3 OLOO3

O.T3
. 3 CU
O X O •«-
C O) t_ <4-
CO CD-i-
U- O U- U- U- U.
J= CU QJ
oBOtOO-oB °B oB oB
03 O to
s: QJ T3 2: s: 2: s:
***«». 1 % ""**>•» *^"S1». ****>. "**^^
LO'J-COO LO O LO
CTlO-r-CLO CM CM CNJ
•—
T3
c
cu
QJ
(- C
o3 t-
4-> 0
to _a ^
•r- 00 Q U- U-
° 4-53 °

-------
               TABLE  15.   INCIDENCES  OF  LIVER  LESIONS  IN C3H MICE
                 TREATED  WITH  HEPTACHLOR OR  HEPTACHLOR  EPOXIDE
Dose group
Controls
Heptachlor (10 ppm)
Heptachlor
epoxide (10 ppm)
Hepatic
hyperplasia
38/200
108/200
65/200
Benign liver
tumors only
30/200
51/200a
85/200b
Malignant
liver tumors only
21/200
10/200
13/200
^Statistically significant  (p < 0.0064),
•^Statistically significant  (p < 10~9).

SOURCE:  Davis, 1965.
        TABLE 16.  INCIDENCES OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA IN C3H MICE
                TREATED WITH HEPTACHLOR OR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
Dose group
   Males
Females
Controls
10 ppm heptachlor
10 ppm heptachlor epoxide
22/78 (28%)
64/87 (73%)
73/79 (92%)
2/54 (4%)
57/78 (73%)
77/81 (95%)
SOURCE:  Davis, 1965 (as diagnosed by Reuben, 1977b)
                                     4-54

-------
Reuben's findings yielded a highly significant (p =  5  x 1CT8  to  <1  x 1(T9)
increase in incidences of liver carcinoma in both sexes for heptachlor and
heptachlor epoxide.  Four other independent pathplogists (Drs. R.  Squire, R.
Sternberg, H.  Stewart, and 6.  Williams)  reviewed a  sample of 19 slides and
generally concurred in the Reuben diagnoses (U.S. EPA, 1985b).
     In addition to liven tumors, Reuben  also diagnosed nontumon liver lesions,
primarily hyperplasia, nodules, hepatic vein thrombosis, and  cirrhosis, in the
heptachlor and heptachlor-epoxide-treated mice.
     4.4.1.2.1.2.  National Cancer Institute (1977b).   In the NCI carcinogen-
icity bioassay conducted at Gulf South Research Institute, technical grade
heptachlor (approximately 73 percent heptachlor, 22  percent trans-chlordane,
and 5 percent noriochlor) was fed to groups of 50 B6C3F1 mice of  each sex for
80 weeks, followed by an observation period of 10 weeks.  The TWA high-dose
and low-dose concentrations were 6.1 and 13.8 ppm (approximately 0.87 and
1.97 mg/kg bw) for males and 9.0 and 18.0 ppm (approximately 1.29 and 2.57
mg/kg bw) for females, respectively.  Controls consisted of 20 male and 10
female matched control mice, and 100 male and 80 female pooled control mice.
     Hepatocellular carcinoma was the most frequently observed neoplasm.  The
incidence in high-dose males was significantly higher (p = 0.001) when compared
with matched controls, while the incidence in low-dose males was comparable  to
that of the  control groups.  The difference in hepatocellular carcinoma inci-
dence between high-dose  females and matched controls was also significant (p <
0.005), and  there  was  a  highly significant  (p < 0.0001) dose-related increase
in the  incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas for female mice due to the dif-
ference between  the high-  and  low-dose groups.  Other tumor types were observed
with low  frequency among all groups.  The  incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma
in mice is presented  in  Table  17.
                                     4-55

-------
               TABLE 17.  INCIDENCE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA
                           IN B6C3F1 MICE FOLLOWING
           CHRONIC DIETARY EXPOSURE TO HEPTACHLOR/CHLORDANE MIXTURE9
        Groups (ppm diet)
Incidence9
        Males

         0 (pooled)
         0 (matched)
         6.1
        13.8
17/92 (18%)
 5/19 (26%)
11/46 (24%)
34/47 (72%)b
        Females

         0 (pooled
         0 (matched)
         9.0
        18.0
 3/78 (  4%)
 2/10 (20%).
 3/47 (  6%)
30/42 (71%)c
Incidence expressed as No. of tumor-bearing mice
.                         No. of tissues examined
DStatistically different from matched controls (p = 0.0001);  also  dose-related
 increase in male mice (p < 0.0001).
cStatistically different from matched controls (p < 0.005);
 also dose-related increase in female mice (p < 0.0001).

SOURCE:  NCI, 1977b.
                                     4-56

-------
There were also many nodules in the mice that did not have liver carcinomas.
     4.4.1.2.1.3.  International Research and Development Corporation (1973b).
IRDC, under contract with Velsicol  Chemical  Corporation, fed a 25:75 mixture
of heptachlor:heptachlor epoxide in the diet, at concentrations of 1, 5, or
10 ppm (approximately 0.14, 0.71, or 1.43 mg/kg bw) for 18 months to groups
of 100 male and 100 female CD-I mice, starting at 7 weeks of age.  Similar
control groups were fed an insecticide-free diet.  The incidences of hepato-
mas were lower among the higher dose groups than in the 1 mg/kg diet group
and controls.  However, the incidences of nodular hyperplasia (Table 18) were
highly significant at 5 and 10 ppm in both males and females when compared
with controls.  Upon reexamination of the slides, Reuber diagnosed more
hepatic carcinomas and less hyperplasia and hyperplastic nodules (U.S.  EPA,
1985b).  Five other pathologists (Drs. J. Rust, P. Newberne, R. Squire, H.,,.
Stewart, and G. Williams) examined a portion of the slides and agreed with4,
Reuber that the incidence of hepatic carcinoma was considerably underdiag-
nosed in the original analysis (U.S. EPA, 1985b).  The incidences of liver""
carcinoma as diagnosed by Reuber are presented in Table 19.
4.4.1.2.2.  Studies with Rats.
     4.4.1.2.2.1.  Cabral et al. (1972).  Heptachlor (96.8 percent pure) in
corn oil was administered by gavage to Wistar rats in five doses of 10 mg/kg
bw each on alternate days starting at 10 days of age.  The heptachlor-treated
group contained 95 Wistar rats, 7 of which died before weaning.  The controls
consisted of 19 males and 27 females treated with corn oil alone.  Many rats
were lost because of high mortality of both treated and control rats and to
an interim sacrifice at 60 weeks.  Twenty-nine females and 30 males remained
after 60 weeks and comprised the carcinogenicity test groups.  All surviving
rats were sacrificed at 106 to 110 weeks.  There was no indication of a treat-
                                     4-57

-------
           TABLE 18.  INCIDENCE OF NODULAR HYPERPLASIA IN CD-I MICE
           EXPOSED TO HEPTACHLOR/HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE (25:75) MIXTURE
     Dose (ppm)
 Males
Females
        0

        1

        5

       10
 0/50 (0%)

 2/53 (4%)

24/57 (42%)

53/69 (77%)
 1/67 (1%)

 0/63 (0%)

 9/56 (16%)

28/46 (61%)
SOURCE:  IRDC, 1973b.
            TABLE 19.  INCIDENCE OF HEPATIC CARCINOMA IN CD-I MICE
      FOLLOWING CHRONIC DIETARY EXPOSURE TO HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE (25:75)a
     Groups (ppm diet)
                     Incidence*5
       Males

         0
         1.0
         5.0  ,
        10.0

        Females

         0
         1.0
         5.0
        10.0
                     0/62 ( 0%)
                     2/68 ( 3%)
                    18/61 (26%)
                    52/80 (65%)c
                     6/76 ( 8%)
                     1/70 (10%)
                     6/65 ( 9%)
                    30/57 (53%)c
aBased on Reuben's revaluation of IRDC (1973b) slides (U.S. EPA, 1985b),
"Incidence expressed as No. of tumor-bearing mice
                         No. of tissues examined
cSignificantly different from control value (p _< 0.001).
                                     4-58

-------
merit-related increase in tumors.
     4.4.1.2.2.2.  Kettering Laboratory (Jolley et al., 1966).  In this study,
a 75:25 mixture of"heptachlorzheptachlor epoxide 'was administered to groups of
                                  .                                       •>
25 female CD rats in the diet at concentrations of 5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 ppm
(approximately 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, and 0.625 mg/kg bw) for 2 years.  A dose-
related increase in mortality was observed.  A comprehensive histological
evaluation revealed spontaneous tumors, such as mammary adenomas or fibroade-
nomas, with random frequency among treatment and control groups.  No malignant
lesions of the liver were observed, although hepatocytomegaly was increased at
7.5, 10, and 12.5 ppm.                                                    ^
     4.4.1.2.2.3.  National Cancer Institute (1977b).  In the NCI bioassay
conducted at Gulf South Research Institute, technical grade heptachlor was fed
for 80 weeks to groups of 50 male and 50 female Osborne-Mendel rats at a time-
weighted average dietary level of 38.9 or 77.9 ppm (approximately 1.95 or 3.90
mg/kg bw) for males and 25.7 or 51.3 ppm (approximately 1.29 or 2.57 mg/kg bw)
for females.  Animals were maintained for an additional 30 weeks on a hepta-
chlor-free diet.  Ten rats of each sex served as the matched controls, and 60
rats of each sex served as pooled controls.
     Overall, the incidence of neoplastic liver lesions was somewhat greater in
the heptachlor-treated groups than that observed after chlordane treatment.
However, no hepatocellular carcinomas were observed in any of the rats, with
one cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed in one low-dose male.  Neoplastic nodules were
observed in all treated and control groups, with no statistically significant
(p _< 0.05) dose-related trend.  The incidences are presented in Table 20.  A
statistically significant exact test for a dose-related trend (p < 0.002) was
              .  ~     •• •     ' •          .                     ..-'•<  :i ••:•"  -., •;-, 2;, - •
found for follicular-cell carcinomas of the thyroid of females, but not in,; •
males, when they were combined with adenomas.  However, this finding was dis-
                                     4-59

-------
counted by NCI because the incidences of carcinomas were low and because of the

variability of thyroid tumors in control rat populations.  The more recent

review by Goodman et al. (1980) of historical control  tumor incidences in the

Osborne-Mendel rat used in the NCI studies lends further support to the NCI

decision.
       TABLE 20.  INCIDENCES OF NEOPLASTIC NODULES IN OSBORNE-MENDEL RATS'
               FOLLOWING CHRONIC DIETARY EXPOSURE TO HEPTACHLORa
     Groups (ppm diet)
Incidence'3
       Males

        0 (pooled)
        0 (matched
       38.9
       77.9

       Females

        0 (pooled)
        0 (matched)
       25.7
       51.3
  2/58 (3%)
  1/10 (10%)
  3/44 (7%)
  6/49 (12%)
  5/59 (8%)
  1/10 (10%)
  9/48 (19%)
  5/46 (11%)
aNot significant  (p £ 0.05) by either exact test or life-table adjustment.
^Incidence expressed  as No. of nodule-bearing  rats
                          No. of tissues examined
SOURCE:   NCI, 1977a.
     4.4.1.2.2.4.   Kettering  Laboratory  (Witherup et  al., 1955).   In this first

Kettering  study,  heptachlor  (purity  not  specified) was  administered to groups

of 20 male and  20  female  CF  rats  at  dietary  levels of 1.5,  3,  5, 7, and 10 ppm

(approximately  0.075,  0.15,  0.25,  0.35,  and  0.5 mg/kg bw) for  110  weeks.


                                       4-60

-------
Similar groups of 20 rats served as controls.   Benign and malignant tumors were
randomly distributed among test and control  groups, with greater incidences
observed for females, especially at 5 and 7  ppm.  Liver lesions, described as
the "chlorinated hydrocarbon" type, were observed with high incidence at 7 and
10 ppm in the diet, but no liver lesions were  found at lower dose levels.   The
authors did not believe that the liver lesions were neoplastic.   The analysis
indicated that the incidence of tumors in treated rats was not significantly
different from control incidence.
     4.4.1.2.2.5.  Kettering Laboratory (Hitherup et al., 1959).  In the second
Kettering study, heptachlor epoxide (purity  not specified) was administered in
the diet to groups of 25 male and 25 female  CFN rats at concentrations of 0.5,
2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 ppm (approximately 0.025, 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, and 0.5
mg/kg bw) for 108 weeks.  Similar groups of  controls were maintained on hepta-
chlor epoxide-free diets.  In the Kettering  analysis, malignant  and benign
tumors occurred randomly among the test groups and were not related to hepta-
chlor epoxide treatment.  A reexamination of the histologic slides was conduc-
ted by two pathologists, Drs. M. Reuber and  G. Williams.  Dr. Reuber concluded
that the incidence of hepatic carcinomas was significantly increased above
control incidence at 5 and 10 ppm in female  rats.  Dr. Williams  found more
hepatic nodules at the 10 ppm level in males.   Table 21 presents a summary of
Reuber's and Williams' diagnoses of .liver carcinomas and nodules.  Three other
pathologists reviewed the Kettering studies  and also diagnosed more carcinomas
than reported by Witherup (U.S. EPA, 1985b).
4.4.1.2.3.  Studies with Dogs.
     4.4.1.2.3.1.  Kettering Laboratory (U.S.  EPA, 1977).  In this study,
groups of two males and three females were exposed to dietary doses of 0,  0.5,
2.5, 5, and 7.5 ppm heptachlor epoxide (purity not indicated) for 60 weeks, at
                                      4-61

-------
  TABLE 21.  INCIDENCE OF HEPATIC CARCINOMA AND NEOPLASTIC NODULE'S IN CFN RATS
            FOLLOWING CHRONIC DIETARY EXPOSURE TO HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE3
 Dose
 (ppm)
         Reuber
                 "''Williams
 Males

  0
  0.5
  2.5
  5.0
  7.5
 10.0

Females
Carcinomas

1/24 (4%)
1/22 (5%)
0/19 (0%)
1/23 (4%)
1/25 (4%)
4/22 (18%)
 Nodules

6/24 (25%)
6/22 (27%)
7/19 (37%)
9/23 (39%)
2/25 (8%)
7/22 (32%)
Carcinomas    Nodules
0/24 (0%)
1/23 ('4%)
0/21 (0%)
1/22 (5%)
0/25 (0%)u
1/22.(5%)b
0/24 (0%)
0/23 (0%)
0/21 (0%)
0/22 (0%)
1/25 (4%)
4/22 (18%)b
0 •-'"•
0.5
2.5
5.0
7.5"
10.0
0/17 (0%)
3/22 (14%)
3/18 (17%)
7/22 (32%)c
3/21 (14%)
5/19 (26%)c
7/17 (41%)
8/22 (36%)
4/18 (22%)
10/22 (45%)c
14/21 (67%)-
8/19 (42%)c
0/17 '(0%)
0/20 (0%)
0/18 (0%)'
1/22 (5%)
0/23 (0%)
1/19 (5%)
4/17 (24%).
5/20 (25%)
2/18 (11%)"
2/22 (9%)
' 5/23 (22%)
1/19 (5%)
Incidence is expressed as No. of tumor-bearing rats
                              No. of rats examined
"Statistically significant (p = 0.019) for combined incidence of carcinomas and
 nodules (U.S. EPA, 1985b).
Statistically significant (p = 0.05) for combined incidence of carcinomas and
 nodules (U.S. EPA, 1985b).

SOURCE:  Witherup et al., 1959.  Data from the Reuber/Williams diagnoses pre-
         sented in U.S. EPA, 1985b.                                   - •  :  '  '
                                      4-62

-------
which time they were sacrificed and'autopsied.  No tumors were reported.   While
the liver weights of both males and females tended to increase logarithmically
in proportion to the amounts of heptachlor epoxide in the diet, only one  male
at the highest dose had observable hepatic damage.  The damage was characterized
by cloudy swelling of the cells with slight clumping of the cytoplasm.  The-
study duration (60 weeks) is considered too short and the number of animals too
small for this to be a valid carcinogenicity study.
4.4.2.  Epidemiologic Studi es
4.4.2.1.  Infante et al. (1978)—Infante et al. (1978) presented data on  five
case reports of neuroblastoma and six case reports of aplastic anemia and acute
leukemia.  Between December 1974 and February 1976, 14 cases of neuroblastoma
were diagnosed at a single pediatric hospital.  Of these, a history of exposure
to toxic agents indicated that five had previous exposure to chlordane.  The
cases ranged in age from 2 years, 8 months to 6 years, 5 months.  Exposure in
each case was due to the use of chlordane in the home due to pest infestation.
In two of the five cases, the first exposure occurred during the first trimester
of pregnancy in the mother.  One of these included additional exposure to a
halothane-nitrous oxide anesthetic during the first month of pregnancy.  In the
remaining three cases, exposure occurred after birth.  Two of the five cases
had postnatal exposure to X-rays.  The authors stated that of the other nine
cases admitted to the hospital during this time period, a history of exposure
to chlordane was not known.
     According to the authors, three cases of aplastic anemia and three cases
of leukemia were reported "at several hospitals in the past several years."
The three aplastic anemias were in males with exposure to chlordane in the
home.   In each case, the man had actually applied the chemical himself.  In
two cases, exposures to other toxic agents, including other insecticides,
                                      4-63

-------
paints, thinners, and varnishes were reported.   The ages of the three men  were
15, 28, and 68.
     Of the three leukemia cases, only one was  reported to have been  exposed  to
other toxic substances besides chlordane.   This 23-year-old man was employed  by
a lawn care company for which he sprayed lawns  with Banvel D,  diazinon,  and
2,4-D, as well as chlordane.  The second case was a 9-year-old girl who  had
been exposed to chlordane annually since birth  through the use of chlordane  in
the home to treat termites.  The third leukemia case was a 37-year-old male who
had used chlordane around his house for a period of 10 years.
     The authors reported on several case studies of exposure  to chlordane or
heptachlor.  As no control group was used as a  comparison population, these
data provide inadequate information with which  to assess the association of
cancer risk and chlordane or heptachlor exposure.
4.4.2.2.  Wang and MacMahon (1979a)--A retrospective cohort mortality study  of
16,126 professional pesticide applicators was undertaken to study the mortality
patterns of these workers.  The cohort was selected from three pest control
companies with offices in over 40 states.  Personnel records for all  persons
in job categories potentially involving exposure to various pesticides and
employed between January 1, 1967 and June 30, 1976, were reviewed for two  of
the companies.  For the third company, employee records were not available for
the period prior to January 1, 1968; therefore, this date was  used as the  ear-
liest date of eligibility for this company, with a closing date of December  31,
1976.-" From 44,083 records, 16,126 subjects were identified who met the  follow-
ing criteria:  (1) male, (2) employed for 3 months or more, and (3) social
security number, date of birth, and employment dates were also available.   Of
those not eligible, a sample of 4,000 were examined.  Eleven percent had been
excluded because they were female, 71 percent because they were employed for
                                      4-64

-------

-------
SMRs were observed for skin cancer (SMR = 173,  statistically  nonsignificant)
and for bladder cancer (SMR = 277, corrected observed = 3.5,  95  percent  CI
101-761). Statistically significant SMR deficits were observed for  malignant
neoplasms of the digestive organs and peritoneum (SMR = 46, corrected  ob-
served = 6.9, 95 percent CI 22-95), respiratory system diseases  (SMR = 29,
corrected observed = 4.6, 95 percent CI 12-70), diseases of the  digestive
system (SMR = 55, corrected observed = 11.6, 95 percent CI 31-98),  and all
other causes (SMR = 355, corrected observed = 15, 95 percent  CI  33-90).
     SMRs for various specific causes of death  using the true number of  ob-
served deaths can be calculated and are presented here.  For  the total cohort
they are as follows:  SMR for all causes of death is 84 (observed = 269);  for
malignant neoplasms, the SMR is 75 (observed = 47); for cancer of the  digestive
organs and peritoneum, the SMR is 40 (observed = 6); for skin cancer,  the  SMR
is 150 (observed = 3); for bladder cancer, the SMR is 231 (observed =  3);  for
non-malignant diseases of the respiratory system, the SMR is  25  (observed  =  4);
and for non-malignant diseases of the digestive system, the  SMR is 48  (observed
= 10).
     Analyses were also conducted for those workers classified as termite  con-
trol operators, since they were thought to have had the most  exposure  to chlor-
dane and heptachlor.  SMRs were presented for termite control operators  and  for
all other applicators for various causes of death.  These SMRs were based  on
corrected observed values.  The SMR for all causes of death  for the termite
control operators was 92 and for all other applicators was 78.  For malignant
neoplasms, the SMR for both groups was 83.  Elevated SMRs were observed  for
each group for cancer of the skin  (SMR for termite control  operators = 148,
SMR for all  other applicators = 187), and cancer of the bladder (SMR for ter-
mite control operators = 215, SMR  for all other applicators = 187).  None of
                                      4-66

-------
the above-mentioned SMRs was statistically significant.  The authors stated
                   "   .                                                  .. '.- '3W

that the only significant SMRs (p < 0.05) observed for termite control opera-


tors were for cancer of the digestive organs (SMR = 20, corrected observed =


1.2) and for cerebrovascular disease (SMR = 39, corrected observed = 2.4).
                                                                          fi£ •  • '

The authors also stated that there were no significant findings in the "all
                   . .                    •                                -•(••-.'"'
                                                                           ,».

other applicator" group, nor were there significant differences in SMRs between


the two groups.  (The method used to determine significant differences between
                  '   >                        ,                           . '   '7!**-'  .

the two groups was not reported.)  A nonsignificant increase in lung cancer was


restricted to the "all other applicator" group (SMR =131, corrected observed


= 16.9).  It is possible to calculate SMRs using the true number of observed
                                                                         '  it'.':

deaths for cancer of the skin and bladder.  For skin cancer, the SMR for ter-


mite control operators was 120, and for all other applicators was 167.  For


bladder cancer, the SMR for termite control operators was 200, and for all


other applicators was 250.
                                                                           C' >'

     Workers were classified according to intensity of exposure into three


groups:  minimal, intermediate, and highest exposure.  None of the causes of
                                                                          '•: C 7

death exhibited an increase in SMR with an increase in intensity of exposure.


In fact, SMRs based on corrected observed values for lung cancer and skin


cancer tended to decrease with intensity of exposure.  For lung cancer SMRs of


138, 120, and 87 were observed for minimal, intermediate, and highest exposure,
                                                                         • :. i>

respectively, and for skin cancer SMRs of 198, 187, and 138 were observed,,


respectively.  The authors did not discuss the statistical  significance of
                                                                        - -,'•' Jf*;:

these findings.
                                                                        • , 0'"*

     A latency analysis was performed for lung cancer.  However, few workers


were followed for more than 10 years since first employment, and none of the


lung cancer deaths had been followed for that length of time.  Positive trends
toward an increase in lung cancer deaths occurred as the period of latency
                                                                         •a::-
                                      4-67

-------
increased.
     There are several  limitations to this study.   The major limitation  is  the
distribution of deaths without death certificates  according to the distribution
of those with death certificates.  If the age-distribution (or the distribution
of any other disease-related variable) of the group without death.certificates
had been different from that of the group with death certificates, the cause-
specific death distribution could have been different, and could have resulted
in inaccurate calculation of observed numbers.'
     There was also no quantitative information available on levels of expo-
sure, and duration of exposure could only be assessed for lung cancer because
of small numbers of observed cases.  It is not possible to assess risks for
chlordane and heptachlor exposure independently of the risks from other possi-
ble exposures.  While the termite control applicators may have had a greater
likelihood of chlordane and heptachlor exposure than other applicators, their
exposure to other pesticides cannot be ignored.
     The authors did not individually follow up each cohort member.  The only
method  used to ascertain vital status was a search through SSA records.  Thus,
the number of deaths may have been underreported.  There was no control of con-
founding  factors such as smoking  and alcohol consumption.  This study provides
inadequate evidence on the carcinogenicity of chlordane and heptachlor.
4.4.2.3.  Wang and MacMahon  (1979b)—A retrospective  cohort mortality study was
undertaken in two chlordane  and  heptachlor manufacturing  plants between 1946
and 1976.  Personnel  records were available for 951 workers who had ever worked
at a chlordane production plant  in Marshall,  IL,  and  for  1425 workers who  had
ever worked  at a heptachlor  and  endrin plant  in Memphis,  TN before the  spring
of 1976.  Of these, 1,403 subjects were  identified who met the  following cri-
teria:   (1) male,  (2) who had worked  for more than 3  months,  and  (3)  "adequate"
                                      4-68

-------
identifying information was available.  Of the 973 excluded, 7 percent were
excluded because they were female, 64 percent because they worked less than 3
months, and 29 percent because identifying information was not available.
     The SSA identified 104 deaths in the study cohort through the end of 1975.
Nine additional deaths, not identified by SSA, were discovered during the con-
duct of a separate study (reference not reported) that individually followed up
terminated workers from these plants.  Death certificates were obtained from
the appropriate states for the 113 deaths (98 percent of those ascertained)
and were coded according to the 8th revision of the ICD by one of the authors
(Wang).  Cause-specific SMRs were calculated by means of Munson's (1974) com-
puter program, using national mortality rates for white males by age and calen-
dar year in 5-year groups.  For the computation of person-years, the beginning
dates were January 1, 1946 for the Marshall  plant and January 1, 1952 for the
Memphis plant, or at the end of 3 months of employment if that date was later
than the appropriate date above.  The authors calculated 95 percent confidence
intervals by an iterative method based on mid-p values.
     The authors attempted to correlate the intensity of exposure with mortal-
ity experience.  Complete occupational histories were not available for each
worker, and serum levels of pesticides actively used in 1975 and, 1976 did not
correlate with a classification of presumed exposure based on job category;
however, no data were presented.  Thirty-four percent of the study cohort had
less than 10 years duration of follow-up, 25 percent had 20 to 29 years of
follow-up, and 11 percent had more than 29 years of follow-up.
     The overall  SMR for all  causes of death was 72 (observed = 113, 95 percent
CI 59-86), confirming the healthy worker effect.  A deficit was seen in the SMR
for all cancers (SMR = 82), but this was not statistically significant.   Sta-
tistically nonsignificant deficits were observed for malignant  neoplasms:   for
                                      4-69

-------
cancer of the digestive organs and peritoneum, the SMR was  82;  for  lymphatic
and hematopoietic cancers the SMR was 30; and for all  other cancers combined
the SMR was 45.  A statistically nonsignificant excess was  observed for lung
cancer; the SMR was 134 (p > 0.05).  The'only significantly elevated SMR was
for cerebrovascular disease (SMR = 183; observed = 17, 95 percent CI 110-287).
OnljTone death was attributed to liver cancer:  an 81-year-old  man  who died  in
1958 and had worked for the company for 5 years beginning in 1944.   A signifi-
cant deficit was observed for ischemic heart disease (SMR = 69, observed = 37,
95 percent CI 49-94).
     Because the SMR for lung cancer was elevated (SMR = 134),  though not sta-
tistically significant, the distribution of lung cancer deaths  across other
variables was investigated.  For workers less than 35 years old at  entry into
occupation and less than 50 years old at observation, the authors noted that
the difference between observed and expected (5 and 1.2, respectively) was
statistically significant (p < 0.01).  The relationship between duration of
employment and duration of follow-up or latency for lung cancer was studied.
The numbers were small and no overall pattern was observed.  However, the
results indicate that there was a statistically significant deficiency (p-value
not reported) in lung cancer deaths  (observed = 1, expected = 4) among those
exposed for 20 or more years.  Conversely, among those employed for 10 to 19
years  and followed for 10 to 19 years, there was an excess risk (observed =  6,
                                                  , 1(...  „ *         i- -         '  •'*  .
expected = 2.1).
                                                 > , c f-            •
     There are limitations to this study.  There was 'no information available
on levels of exposure or duration of exposure.  It is  not possible to assess
risks  for chlordane and heptachlor exposure independently of the risks of
endrin exposure, a pesticide also manufactured at the  Memphis plant.
     the cohort included all plant employees, including those with little
                                      4-70

-------
 potential  for exposure, such as office workers;  and therefore,  the risk of can-
 cer may have been underestimated for those directly involved in chlordane and
 heptachlor manufacture.  While the period of follow-up was  long, the size of
 the cohort was very small.   Thus,  the study had  very little power to detect a
 real  difference if one was  present.
      The authors did not individually follow up  each cohort member.   Therefore,
 the number of deaths may have been underreported.   Excluded from the cohort
 were  282 individuals with missing  data,  representing about  29 percent of  the
 final  cohort population.  The authors provide  no data  with  which  to  assess  the
 impact of  excluding  these workers  from the  cohort;  however,  this  may be a
 random occurrence.   If this  assumption is true,  then their  exclusion poses  no
 bias  to the  estimates  of  risk.
      There was  no  control of  confounding variables  such as  smoking.  However,
 a  significantly low  SMR was  observed  for ischemic heart disease,  a disease  for
 which  smoking  is a well-documented risk factor.  The SMR for other respiratory
 diseases was  also  low, though not  significantly.   This result suggests that
 the cohort in question smoked at levels below that of males nationally, and
 provides additional  evidence that the  reported excess incidence of lung cancer
 (SMR =  134) may have been an occupationally related  increase.  Finally, race
 was assumed to be white for all study subjects.  As no deaths among non-whites
 were observed, this assumption may be a valid one.   Thus,  this study provides
 inadequate evidence for the carcinogenicity of chlordane and heptachlor.
 4.4.2.4.  Ditraglia et al. (1981)—A retrospective  cohort  mortality study of
 employees at four organochlorine pesticide manufacturing plants  was undertaken.
All workers (race and sex not specified)  who had  at  least  6  months of employ-
ment in pesticide manufacture prior to December 31,  1964 were included in  the
study population.  Vital  status was determined for each worker as of December

                                      4-71

-------
31, 1976, through the SSA, State motor vehicle offices, U.S.  Postal  Mail  Cor-
rective Services, and "other" sources.
     Four separate cohorts representing four pesticide plants comprised the
study population.  Only one plant had manufactured chlordane and had done so
since 1946.  No other pesticides were manufactured at this plant, but other
chemical- products manufactured there included chlorine and dicyclopentadiene.
The cohort at plant 1 consisted of 327 individuals, representing 8,354 person-
years of observation.  Three percent were lost to follow-up.  Plant 2 had
manufactured heptachlor since 1951.  Endrin was also produced at this plant in
addition to chlorine, chlorendic anhydride, hexachlorocyclopentadiene, and
vinyl chloride.  The cohort  at this plant consisted of 305 workers  (5,672
person-years of  observation), and 5 percent were lost  to  follow-up.  The two
remaining  plants were not involved in  the production of chlordane or heptachlor
and, thus, results  are  not discussed  here for these two plants.  The chlordane
and heptachlor plants had previously  been studied  by Wang and MacMahon  (1979b),
who combined the two  plant populations into  a single cohort  with a  longer
period  of  follow-up in  comparison to  the  follow-up period reported  in  this
 study  (Ditraglia et al.,  1981).
     Death certificates for  all  known decedents  were  obtained  and  coded  by a
 nosologist to  the ICD-A in effect  at  the  time of death.   Those  with an unknown
 vital  status were assumed alive as  of December 31, 1976.   SMRs  were calculated
 by using the U.S.  white male age-,  calendar time-, and cause-specific  mortality
 rates.   Statistical significances  between the observed and  expected values were
 tested with the Poisson distribution.  Confidence intervals were presented for
 the SMR estimates, but the method of calculation was not  reported  by the authors.1
      Statistically significant (p < 0.05) deficits were observed for all causes
 of death  at the chlordane plant (SMR = 68, observed = 59, 95 percent CI 52-87)
                                       4-72

-------
and at the heptachlor plant (SMR = 66, observed = 24, 95 percent CI 42-98).
For deaths due to malignant neoplasms, the chlordane plant had an SMR of 69,
and the heptachlor plant had an SMR of 91, none being statistically signifi-
cant.  At the chlordane plant, risks were elevated for stomach cancer (SMR =
303), rectal cancer (SMR = 178), pancreatic cancer (SMR = 110),-and.-.respiratory'
system cancer (SMR = 110).  None of these risks was statistically, significant^
At the heptachlor plant, excess risk was observed for intestinal  cancer (SMR-,,5=
175), respiratory system cancer (SMR = 122), and cancer of the bladder and uri-
nary system (SMR = 606).  These risks were also not statistically significant.
     An analysis by latency was also carried out.  SMRs were calculated for
deaths due to all malignant neoplasms according to latency, which was defined;
as the number of years from date of first employment.  Latency was categorized
into three time periods:  (1) less than 10 years since first employed, (2) 1.0;
to 19 years since first employed, and (3) 20 or more years since first employ-.
ed.  In the chlordane plant, SMRs of 66, 90, and 60 were reported for all
malignant neoplasms for the three latency time periods, respectively.  The  ,
individual point estimates were not significant.  There were no observed deaths
in the less than 10-year latency period in the heptachlor plant.   The SMR for
all malignant neoplasms for the 10- to 19-year latency period was 91, and for
the -20 or more year period the SMR was 162.  These were not statistically, .-,.-.
significant; however, there may have been a positive trend of increasing risk
with increasing latency at the heptachlor plant.  ,                       ,  ;,.,
     This study revealed excess risk of cancer at various tissue sites for all
                                       ;                            - '     . i   i t, -. i'
workers at these two plants.  While none of the SMRs was statistically signifi-.
cant, the SMR of 303 (observed = 3) for stomach cancer in the chlordane,pi ant
may be important.  However, there are limitations to this study.         ,.
     No information on quantitative exposures were provided.  It  was  not pos-
                                      4-73

-------
sible to assess the effects of chlordane or heptachlor  independently of the
other toxic chemicals at the two plants, some of which  are  known  to be carcin-
ogenic.  No attempt was made to exclude or adjust for the effects of sex or
race, nor was there an effort to control for other confounding  variables such
as smoking or alcohol consumption.  However, the size of the  study populations
would preclude any real analysis of these variables.  Workers with little  or no
occupational exposure to these chemicals (i.e.,  office  workers, etc.) were
included in the cohort.  Thus, risks may have been underestimated- for workers
involved in the day-to-day manufacture of chlordane or  heptachlor. The size of
the study population was small in spite of follow-up periods  of 25 years or
more.  Thus, the power of this study to detect a statistically  significant
result is limited.  This study provides inadequate evidence to  link chlordane
or heptachlor exposure to cancer.
4.5.  STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS
     Seven chemicals were identified as important in the analysis of the struc-
ure-activity relationships of chlordane and heptachlor  for  carcinogenicity.
These chemicals are aldrin, chlorendic acid, dieldrin,  endrin,  endosulfan,
hexachlorocyclopentadiene, and isodrin; their structures are  presented  in
Figure 4.
4.5.1.  Aldrin
4.5.1.1.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Human Exposure (IARC.  1982)—Specific
mention of aldrin in analytic epidemiologic studies is  limited  to reports  of
the follow-up of a cohort of men employed in its manufacture  at a plant where
dieldrin, and later endrin and telodrin, were also manufactured.   In the most
recent report, of 166 men exposed to these compounds for more than 4 years and
for 15 or more years before the end of  follow-up, two cases of  cancer  were
observed.  No estimate was provided of the expected number  of cancers,  and the
                                      4-74

-------
 Cl
        Dieldrin
   Cl
                      .3=0
        Endosulfan
                                              Cl
                                                                OH
                                            Cl   Chlorendic Acid
        Endrin
                                                  Cl,
     Cl
       ci       ci
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
                       Cl-
                       Cl     Isodrin
Figure 4.  Chemicals selected for  structure-activity analysis.

                              4-75 •

-------
description of follow-up was limited.  These data are inadequate to assess  the
carcinogenicity of aldrin in humans.
4.5.1.2.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Animal  Studies (IARC,  1982)—Aldrin
has been tested by the oral route in mice and rats.   It was carcinogenic in
mice at 10 ppm in the diet, producing malignant  liver neoplasms:  three studies
in rats were negative or equivocal and one was inadequate due to decreased
survival rates.  These data provide sufficient evidence for the carcinogenicity
of aldrin.
4.5.1.3.  Evidence for Activity in Short-Term Tests (IARC. 1982)—Aldrin did
not produce damage to Escherichia coli plasmid DNA and was not mutagenic to
Salmonella typhimurium or to yeast.  It did not  induce recessive lethal muta-
tions in Drosophila melanogaster.  Aldrin induced DNA repair in cultured human
fibroblasts and lymphocytes, but it did not elicit unscheduled DNA synthesis
in cultured rat hepatocytes.  It produced chromosomal aberrations in bone-
marrow cells of rats and mice exposed in vivo, but it did not elicit a  positive
response in the mouse bone-marrow micronucleus test.  No data on human  cell
lines or lymphocytes were available.  These data are inconclusive in assessing
the carcinogenicity of aldrin.
4.5.2.  Chlorendic Acid
4.5.2.1.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Human Exposure (NTP, 1985)—Chlorendic
acid is manufactured in an essentially closed system.  Although this procedure
would seem to minimize human exposure, there are no published data on the level
of occupational exposure to Chlorendic anhydride or Chlorendic acid.
4.5.2.2.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Animal  Studies (NTP, 1985)—In an  NTP
bioassay, there was clear evidence of carcinogenicity for Chlorendic acid in
male F344/N rats as shown by increased incidences of neoplastic nodules of  the
liver and acinar cell adenomas of the pancreas.   Increased incidences of alve-
                                      4-76

-------
olar/bronchiolar adenomas and preputial gland carcinomas may also have been
related to the administration of chlorendic acid.  There was evidence of car-
cinogenicity for chlorendic acid in female F344/N rats as shown by increased
incidences of neoplastic nodules and of carcinomas of the liver.  There was
evidence of carcinogenicity for chlorendic acid in male B6C3F1 mice as shown
by increased incidences of hepatocellular adenomas and hepatocellular car-
                                                                            ,'S'"
cinomas.  There was no evidence of carcinogenicity for chlorendic acid in
female B6C3F1 mice given chlorendic acid in the diet at concentrations of 620
or 1,250 ppm for 103 weeks.  These data provide sufficient evidence for the
carcinogenicity of chlorendic acid.
4.5.2.3.  Evidence of Activity in Short-Term Tests (NTP, 1985)--Chlorendic
acid was not mutagenic in strains TA100, TA98, TA1535, or TA1537 of SalmonelTa
typhimurium in the presence or absence of Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-
                        t
Dawley rat or male Syrian hamster liver S9 when tested according to the pre-
incubation protocol.  Chlorendic acid was mutagenic in the L5178Y/TK"1"/" mouse
lymphoma cell forward mutation assay in the absence of S9 and was not tested in
the presence of S9.  There was no mutagenic response in the absence of severe
toxicity.  The toxicity curve was sharp, going from relative total  growth of
74 percent to 5 percent at doses of 1,600 to 1,700 yg/mL.  With such a sharp
toxic response, the increase in mutant count and mutant frequency was observed
only at the higher dose; this response was replicated in another experiment.
A response in which only one toxic response is positive raises the question of
whether the mutagenic response is an indirect mechanism in which the mutation
is not due to the direct interaction of the chemical  with DNA.  This assay, as
performed, does not answer this question.   These data are inconclusive in
assessing the carcinogenicity of chlorendic acid.
                                       4-77

-------
4.5.3.  Dieldrin
4.5.3.1.  Evidence for Cardnogenicity - Human Exposure (lARCjj  1982)—Mean
tissue levels of dieldrin were elevated in one autopsy study of 50 cancer
patients and 42 comparison subjects.  Mean serum levels were also reported  to
be elevated in eight cancer patients compared with seven controls.  Follow-up
of sdrte 233 workmen (166 employed for more than 4 years and followed  for 15 or
more years) showed two cancer deaths at a plant where aldrin and dieldrin,  and  ;
later endrin and telodrin, were manufactured.  These data are inadequate to
assess the carcinogenicity of dieldrin.
4.5.3.2.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Animal Studies (IARC,  1982)--Die1drin
is carcinogenic to mice, producing benign and malignant liver neoplasms in  many
strains following oral administration.  Studies in rats are negative  or equivo-
cal.  No carcinogenic effect was observed in feeding studies with hamsters.
Feeding studies with dogs and monkeys were considered to be inadequate  for  a
carcinogenicity evaluation.  These data provide sufficient evidence for the
carcinogenicity of dieldrin.
4.5.3.3.  Evidence for Activity in Short-Term Tests (IARC, 1982)--Die1drin  did
not produce DNA breaks in an Escherichia coli plasmid.  It did  elicit DNA  re-  i
pair in cultured human fibroblasts and human lymphocytes, but it did.not do so
in cultured rat hepatocytes and did not produce DNA damage in cultured  Chinese"
hamster cells.  It was not mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium, to yeast, to
Drosophila melanogaster (recessive lethals) or to the wasp, Bracon hebetor.
In a limited study, it was weakly mutagenic to Chinese hamster  V79 cells.   It
produced chromosomal aberrations in human embryonic lung cells  in vitro and  ..
chromosomal damage to mouse bone-marrow cells-in vivo in one study but  not  in .
another, and not in Chinese hamster bone-marrow cells.  It did  not induce cell,
transfdrmaton in vitro (in BHK cells).  It was negative in the  mouse  dominant^
                                      4-78

-------
lethal test and did not induce mitotic gene conversion in yeast in a host-medi-
ated assay.  No data on human cell  lines or lymphocytes were available.   These
data are inconclusive in assessing  the carcinogenicity of dieldrin.
4.5.4.  Endrin
4.5.4.1.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Human Exposure (IARC, 1974)—A study
was conducted in 1968 of 233 workers employed in a factory that had been manu-
facturing aldrin and dieldrin since 1954-1955, endrin since 1957, and telodrin
during 1958-65.  Lengths of exposure ranged from 4 to 13.2 years (average, 7.6
years).  One hundred and eighty-one workers were still employed by the same
firm at the time of the study, and  their average age was 41 years (range, 22 to
64).  Only two deaths had occurred, and one was due to stomach cancer.  The
52 workers who had left the company were the subject of a subsequent report*
Average age at the time of this survey was 47.4 years (range, 29 to 72), aver-
age occupational exposure was 6.6 years (4.0 to 12.3), and average time since
end of exposure was 7.4 years (4.5  to 16).  Only one death was recorded, and
this had not been caused by cancer.  These data are inadequate to assess the
carcinogenicity of endrin.
4.5.4.2.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Animal Studies (IARC. 1982)--There was
no evidence of carcinogenicity in B6C3F1 mice or Osborne-Mendel rats fed endrin,
although there' was early mortality in both species.  Another rat study was  .
inadequate.  These data are inadequate to assess the carcinogenicity of endrin.
4.5.4.3.  Evidence for Activity in  Short-Term Tests (NTP, 1985)—Endrin did
not cause mutations in NTP Salmonella mutagenicity tests (NTP, 1985).  These
data are inadequate to assess the carcinogenicity of endrin.
4.5.5.  Endosulfan
4.5.5.1.  Evidence for Carcinogenicity - Human Exposure (NCI, 1978)—Specific
mention of endosulfan in analytic epidemiologic studies was not found.  Medical
                                      4-79

-------
  reports  mention  fainting,  convulsions, and unconsciousness following exposure
  to  endosulfan; however,  recovery was  rapid.  These data are inadequate to
  assess the  carcinogenicity of endosulfan.
  4.5.5.2.  Evidence  for Carcinogenicity - Animal Studies (NCI, 1978)—In an NCI
  bioassay, no  conclusion  was drawn on  the carcinogenicity of endosulfan for male
  rats  or  male  mice because  of early deaths in these groups.  Under the condi-
  tions of the  bioassay, endosulfan was not carcinogenic in female Osborne-Mendel
  rats  or  in  female B6C3F1 mice.  These data are  inadequate to assess the carcin-
  ogenicity of  endosulfan.                                               .
  4.5.5.3.  Evidence  for Activity in Short-Term Tests  (NTP. 1985)—No evidence
  of  the mutagenicity of endosulfan was noted  in  the standard Ames test and in
  the mouse micronucleus test.  These data are inadequate to assess the carcin-
  ogenicity of  endosulfan.
  4.5.6.   Hexachlorocyclopentadi ene
  4.5.6.1. Evidence  of Carcinogenicity - Human Exposure (U.S. EPA, 1984)—
  Although there is human  experience with respect to mortality, there is only
  limited  information on the morbidity  results in those exposed to hexachloro-
  cyclopentadiene  (HEX).   Acute inhalation produces a  high prevalence of head-
  aches and severe irritation of the eyes, nose,  throat, and lung.  Dermal con-
  tact  can cause severe burns.  Epidemiologic  studies  have generally shown no
  significant differences  in mortality  between workers exposed to HEX in the
j  workplace and the general  population. Although a significant excess of deaths
  from  cerebrovascular disease was  reported in one study, the deaths showed no
  consistent  pattern  with  respect to duration  of  employment or follow-up.  Cur-
  rent  human  exposure is limited to improper handling  and disposal and proximity
  to  either manufacturing  sites utilizing HEX  or  disposal sites.  These data are
  inadequate  to assess the carcinogenicity of  HEX.
                                       4-80

-------
4.5.6.2.  Evidence of Cardnogenicity - Animal Studies (U.S. EPA, 1984)--In
vivo bioassays have not been conducted; however, an inhalation bioassay of HEX
has been scheduled by NTP.
4.5.6.3.  Evidence for Activity in Short-Term Tests (U.S. EPA. 1984)—The
available evidence suggests that HEX is not a mutagen.  Negative mutagenicity
results were obtained in bacteria, liver epithelial cells, Drosophila, mouse5
lymphoma cells, and in the mouse dominant lethal test.  In addition, HEX didi;
not induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes.   HEX was not a carcin-
ogen Jji_ vrtro in transformation assays using BALB/3T3 cells.  These data are
inadequate to assess the carcinogenicity of HEX.
4.5.7.  Isodrin
4.5.7.1.  Evidence of Carcinogenicity - Human Exposure (HSDB, 1985)—No data*of
occupational exposure to this isomer of aldrin were found.
4.5.7.2.  Evidence of Carci_nqgem'c1ty - Animal Studies (HSDB, 1985)—The' tox-
icity of isodrin is stated to be twice that of aldrin (species tested and
parameters examined were not specified).  No other data on the carcinogenicity
of isodrin were available.
4.5.7.3.  Evidence for Activity in Short-Term Tests (HSDB, 1985)—Isodrin is
converted to endrin by liver microsomes, and endrin did not cause mutations in
NTP Salmonella mutagenicity tests.  These data are inadequate to assess the
carcinogenicity of isodrin.
                                      4-81

-------

-------
                     5.   RISK ESTIMATION FROM ANIMAL DATA
5.1.  SELECTION OF DATA
                                             f
     For some chemicals, several studies in different animal  species, strains,
and sexes at several doses and different routes of exposure may be available.
A choice must be made as to which data sets should be used to quantify human
risk by low-dose extrapolation.  The following procedure was used to make this
choice.  The animal studies are evaluated qualitatively to assure that only
properly conducted studies are used.  The tumor incidence data were separated
according to organ sites and tumor types.  The data sets used in the model  are
the ones in which the tumor incidence is statistically significantly higher in
at least one test dose level as compared to controls and/or where the tumor
incidence rate shows a significant trend with respect to dose level.  Both bio-
logical and statistical considerations have been used to select the most appro-
priate data sets.
     Because humans may be as sensitive as the most sensitive animal species,
potency estimates obtained from  the most sensitive species tested can be aver-
aged to estimate potency for the general population.  Because some subpopula-
tions may be more sensitive than the general  population, the potency estimate
from the most sensitive sex and strain tested is also presented.  This approach
is consistent with EPA's guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment (U.S. EPA,
1986).
5.1.1.  Chlordane
     As described in section 4.4, four data sets showed a significant increase
in hepatocellular carcinomas in treatment groups compared to controls in mice.
These are male and female mice in the IRDC study, and male and female mice in
the NCI study.  Tables 22-25 give tumor incidence data for these studies.   In
                                      5-1

-------
      TABLE 22.  CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF CHLORDANE
                 FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN FEMALE MICE
           Compound:
           Species, strain, sex:
           Body weight:
           Length of experiment:
           Length of exposure:
           Tumor site and type:
           Route, vehicle:
           Human potency
                        Analytical  grade chlordane
                        Mouse, CD-I, female
                        0.030 kg (assumed)
                        19-1/2 months
                        18 months
                        Liver, carcinoma
                        Oral, diet
                        2.98 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
  No. examined
0
5
25
50
0
0.65
3.25
6.50
0
0.052
0.260
0.520
0/45
0/61
32/50
26/37
SOURCE:  IRDC, 1973a.
                                      5-2

-------
      TABLE  23.   CANCER  DATA  SHEET  FOR  DERIVATION  OF  POTENCY  OF  CHLORDANE
                  FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS  IN MALE  MICE
           Compound:
           Species,  strain,  sex:
           Body weight:
           Length of experiment:
           Length of exposure:
           Tumor site and type:
           Route, vehicle:  ^
           Human potency (q^):
                        Analytical  grade chlordane
                        Mouse,  CD-I,  male
                        0.030 kg (assumed)
                        19-1/2  months
                        18 months
                        Liver,  carcinoma
                        Oral, diet
                        4.74  per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0
5
25
50
0
0.65
3.25
6.50
0
0.052
0.260
0.520
3/33
5/55
41/52
32/39
SOURCE:  IRDC, 1973a.
                                       5-3

-------
      TABLE 24.   CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF CHLORDANE
                  FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN MALE MICE
            Compound:
            Species, strain, sex:
            Body weight:
            Length of experiment:
            Length of exposure:
            Tumor site and type:
            Route, vehicle: ^
            Human potency (q):
                         Technical grade chlordane
                         Mouse, B6C3F1, male
                         0.030 kg (assumed)
                         90 weeks
                         80 weeks
                         Liver, carcinoma
                         Oral, diet
                         0.76 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0
29.9
56.2
0
3.9
7.3
0
0.31
0.58
2/18
16/48
43/49
SOURCE:  NCI, 1977a.
                                      5-4

-------
      TABLE 25.   CANCER DATA SHEET  FOR DERIVATION  OF  POTENCY  OF  CHLORDANE
                 FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN FEMALE  MICE
            Compound:
            Species,  strain,  sex:
            Body weight:
            Length of experiment:
            Length of exposure:
            Tumor site and type:
            Route, vehicle:
            Human potency
                         Technical  grade chlordane
                         Mouse, B6C3F1, female
                         0.030 kg (assumed)
                         90 weeks
                         80 weeks
                         Liver, carcinoma
                         Oral, diet
                         0.25  per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0
30.1
63.8
0
3.9
8.3
0
0.31
0.66
0/19
3/47
34/49
SOURCE:  NCI, 1977a.
                                      5-5

-------
rats, only the RIASBT study from Japan showed a significant increase in tumors.
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas in male rats as reevaluated by
Williams was significantly increased in the high-dose group when compared to
controls.  Table 26 gives the tumor incidence for this study.   These five data
sets were used to quantify human risk.
5.1.2.  Heptachlor/Heptachlor Epoxide
     Eight data sets showed significant increases in the incidence of hepato-
cellular carcinomas in treated groups compared to controls.  Tables 27-34
present the tumor incidence for these data sets.  In rats, a significant in-
crease in hepatocellular carcinomas was diagnosed by Reuben.  Incidence data
are shown in Table 35.  These studies were used to quantify the carcinogenic
risk due to heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide exposure.
5.2.  CHOICE OF EXTRAPOLATION MODELS
     Mathematical models are used to estimate human-excess cancer risks associ-
ated with exposure to a given chemical.  The models are fitted to tumor inci-
dence data from animal bioassays, and an extrapolation is made to low doses to
estimate human risk.  The animal bioassay data used to predict human cancer
risk from exposure to chlordane and heptachlor are described in the previous
section.
     Although no single mathematical model is recognized as the most appropri-
ate, some mechanisms of the process are known.  If one accepts the linearity
of tumor formation and if the carcinogenic agent of interest acts in the same
manner as carcinogenic agents acting in the background, then the added effect
of the carcinogen on tumor formation at low doses is linear.  On this basis, a
model that is linear at low doses is appropriate.
     The linearized multistage model is used in this assessment to calculate
human risk.  This model takes the following form:
                                      5-6

-------
      TABLE 26.   CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF CHLORDANE
                FROM LIVER ADENOMAS AND CARCINOMAS IN MALE RATS
            Compound:
            Species, strain, sex:
            Body weight:
            Length of experiment:
            Length of exposure:
            Tumor site and type:
            Route, vehicle: ^
            Human potency (q-):
                         Technical  grade chlordane
                         Rat, F344, male
                         0.35kg
                         130 weeks
                         130 weeks
                         Liver, adenoma and carcinoma
                         Oral, diet
                         1.11 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0 0
1 0.05
5 0.25
25 1.25
0
0.17
0.85
4.25
1/64 •*'
1/64
4/64
9/64
SOURCE:  RIASBT, 1983b.
                                      5-7

-------
      TABLE 27.  CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF HEPTACHLOR
                  FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN MALE MICE
            Compound:
            Species, strain, sex:
            Body weight:
            Length of experiment:
            Length of exposure:
            Tumor site and type:
            Route, vehicle:
            Human potency
                         Heptachlor
                         Mouse, C3H, male
                         0.030 kg (assumed)
                         24 months
                         24 months
                         Liver carcinoma
                         Oral, diet
                         12.4 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0 0.00
10 1.43
0.000
0.108
22/78
64/87
SOURCE:  Davis, 1965, as diagnosed by Reuber, 1977b.
                                      5-8

-------
      TABLE'28;  CANCER'DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF  POTENCY.OF  HEPTACHLOR
                 FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS  IN  FEMALE  MICE
            Compound:       .    '
            Species, strai n, sex:
            Body weight:
            Length of experiment:
            Length of exposure:
            Tumor site''and type:
            Route, vehicle: ^
            Human potency "(q):
                         Heptachlor
                         Mouse, C3H, female
                         0.030 kg (assumed)
                         24 months
                         24 months     ':   .
                         Liver carcinoma
                         Oral, diet
                         14.9 per ,mg/kg/day!
ExpenmentaT'
  " abimail- '•
 dose (ppnij
 Average animal
dose-'(mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor inc'ldehce
No. respondi'hg/
 No. examined
     10 'fl^'''
        b.oo
        1.43
       o'.ooo
       0.108
     2/54
    57/78
SOURCE:  Davis, 1965, as diagnosed by Reuber,  1977b.
                                      5-9

-------
      TABLE 29.  CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF HEPTACHLOR
                  FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN MALE MICE
           Compound:
           Species, strain, sex:
           Body weight:
           Length of experiment:
           Length of exposure:
           Tumor site and type:
           Route, vehicle: ^
           Human potency (q-):
                        Technical  grade heptachlor
                        Mouse, B6C3F1, male
                        0.030 kg (assumed)
                        90 weeks
                        80 weeks
                        Liver, carcinoma
                        Oral, diet
                        2.79 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0
6.1
13.8
0
0.79
1.79
0
0.063
0.14
5/19
11/46
34/47
SOURCE:  NCI, 1977b.
                                      5-10

-------
      TABLE 30.  CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF HEPTACHLOR
                 FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN FEMALE MICE
           Compound:
           Species, strain, sex:
           Body weight:
           Length of experiment:
           Length of exposure:
           Tumor site and type:
           Route, vehicle:
           Human potency
                        Technical grade heptachlor
                        Mouse, B6C3F1, female
                        0.030 kg (assumed)
                        90 weeks
                        80 weeks
                        Liver, carcinoma
                        Oral, diet
                        0.83 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0
9.0
18.0
0
1.17
2.34
0
0.094
0.18
2/10 -
3/47
30/42
SOURCE:  NCI, 1977b.
                                      5-11

-------
  TABLE 31.  CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF!HEPT;ACHLOR EPOXIDE
                  FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN MALE'MICE  :
            Compound:
            Species, strain, sex:
            Body weight:
            Length of experiment:
            Length of exposure:
            Tumor site and type:
            Route, vehicle:
            Human potency
                         Heptachlor epoxide
                         Mouse, C3H, male
                         0.030 kg (assumed)
                         24 months
                         24 months     .  •   ,
                         Liver carcinoma   '
                         Oral, diet    ;; -..
                         27.7 per mg/kg/day
Experrj mental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined  ;
0
10
0.00
1,43
0.000
0.108
22/78 ;:
73/79 ;:,
SOURCE:  Davis, 1965, as diagnosed by Reuber, 1977b.
                                      5-12

-------
  TABLE 32.  CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
                 FROM HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS IN FEMALE MICE
            Compound:
            Species, strain, sex:
            Body weight:
            Length of experiment:
            Length of exposure:
            Tumor site and type:
            Route, vehicle: #
            Human potency (q^):
                         Heptachlor epoxide
                         Mouse, C3H, female
                         0.030 kg (assumed)
                         24 months
                         24 months
                         Liver carcinoma
                         Oral, diet
                         36.2 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor .incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0 0.00
10 1.43
o.ooo
0.108
2/54
77/81 ••-.-
SOURCE:  Davis, 1965, as diagnosed by Reuber, 1977b.
                                     5-13

-------
  TABU 33.   CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION  OF  POTENCY  OF  HEPTACHLOR  EPOXIDE
                     FROM HEPATIC CARCINOMAS  IN FEMALE  MICE
    Compound:
    Species, strain, sex:
    Body weight:
    Length of experiment:
    Length of exposure:
    Tumor site and type:
    Route, vehicle:
    Human potency
               25:75  mixture  of heptachlor/heptachlor  epoxide
               Mouse, CD-I,  female
               0.030  kg  (assumed)
               19 months,  3  weeks
               18 months
               Liver, carcinoma                   .
               Oral,  diet
               1.04  per  mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0 0
1 0.13
5 0.65
10 1.30
0
0.01
0.052
0.10
6/76 .:
1/70
6/65
30/57
SOURCE:  IRDC, 1973b, as reevaluated by Reuber.
                                       5-14

-------
  TABLE 34.  CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF POTENCY OF HEPTACHLOR EPOXS-DE
                      FROM HEPATIC CARCINOMAS IN MALE MICE
    Compound:
    Species, strain, sex:
    Body weight:
    Length of experiment:
    Length of exposure:
    Tumor site and type:
    Route, vehicle:
    Human potency
               25:75 mixture of heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide
               Mouse, CD-I, male
               0.030 kg (assumed)                        •  :
               19 months, 3 weeks
               18 months                                 t
               Liver, carcinoma
               Oral, diet
               6.48 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0 0
1 0.13
5 0.65
10 1.30
0
0.010
0.052
0.10
0/62 .>
2/68 .-
18/68
52/80
SOURCE:  IRDC, 1973b, as reevaluated by Reuben.
                                      5-15

-------
  TABLE 35.   CANCER DATA SHEET FOR DERIVATION OF  POTENCY OF HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
                     FROM HEPATIC CARCINOMAS IN FEMALE RATS
               Compound:
               Species, strain, sex:
               Body weight:
               Length of experiment:
               Length of exposure:
               Tumor site and type:
               Route, vehicle:
               Human potency
                            Heptachlor epoxide
                            Rat, CFN, female
                            0,350 kg (assumed)
                            108 weeks
                            108 weeks
                            Liver, carcinoma
                            Oral, diet
                            5.76 per mg/kg/day
Experimental
   animal
 dose (ppm)
 Average animal
dose (mg/kg/day)
 Equivalent human
dose (mg/kg/day)
Tumor incidence
No. responding/
 No. examined
0
0.5
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
0
0.025
0.125
0.250
0.375
0.500
0
0.0043
0.021
0.043
0.064
0.085
0/17
3/22
3/18
7/22
3/21
5/19
SOURCE:  Witherup et al., 1959, as reevaluated by Reuber.
                                      5-16

-------
P(d) = l-exp[-(q0
q2d
                                                        qkdk)]
where
                  q-j >_ 0, i = 0, 1,  ..., k dose levels and d = dose.

Cancer risks can also  be estimated using models such as the probit, logit,
Wei bull, one-hit, and  gamma multihit.  The linearized multistage model leads to
an upper limit on risk.
5*3.  INTERSPECIES DOSE CONVERSION                                        ''':"
     The low-dose extrapolation process involves the use of animal tumor inci-
dence data to predict  human cancer risk.  Differences exist between humans-^and
experimental test animals with respect to lifespan, body size, and pharmaco-
kinetic mechanisms.  Hence, animal doses need to be converted to equivalent
                                                                          .' '* f"
human doses.  The conversion accounts for noncontiguous feeding, differences in
lifetime, and size differences.  In the absence of information to the contrary,
this assessment uses the surface-area correction recommended by EPA's Guide-
lines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (U.S.  EPA, 1986).   Therefore, a factor of
the cube root of the ratio of the animal to human body weights is applied to
animal doses to calculate equivalent human  doses.   This equation is

                               DH = DA (WA/70)1/3
where
          DH = equivalent human dose (mg/kg/day)
          DA = animal  dose (mg/kg/day)
          WA = weight  of animal (kg):   for mice,  0.03 kg;  for rats, 0.35 kg
          70 = weight  of a human (kg)

                                      5-17

-------
     In the absence of information on human absorption, tissue distribution,
metabolism, and excretion, this assessment makes no adjustment for potential
differences between animals and humans.
5.4.  ESTIMATION OF CARCINOGENIC POTENCY
     Estimates of carcinogenic potency can be obtained by fitting the linear-
ized multistage model, described in Section 5.2, to each data set described in
Section 5.1.  Table 36 summarizes 14 potency estimates obtained in this way.
5.4.1.  Chlordane
     Five data sets involve chlordane:  male and female CD-I mice, male and
female B6C3F1 mice, and male F344 rats.  The most sensitive sex and strain
tested is male CD-I mice.  From these, the potency is estimated at 4.7 per
mg/kg/day.
     The most sensitive species tested is mice.  There are four potency esti-
mates, ranging from 4.7 down to 0.25 per mg/kg/day, with a geometric mean of
1.3 per mg/kg/day.  This  geometric mean from mice is consistent with the potency
estimate from rats of 1.1  per mg/kg/day.  Because humans may be as sensitive as
the most sensitive animal  species, the potency  for the general population is
estimated  at 1.3 per mg/kg/day.
     These estimates are  plausible upper bounds for the  increased cancer risk
from chlordane, meaning that the true  risk is not likely to exceed these esti-
mates  and  may be lower.   These  estimates supersede the potency of 1.61 per
mg/kg/day  previously calculated by the EPA (U...S. EPA,  1980a).
     The molecular potency index, which is the  potency expressed  in  terms
of molecular weight, has  been  used to  rank suspect carcinogens according to
potency.   The index is computed by multiplying  the general-population  potency
by the molecular weight.   The  molecular potency index  for  chlordane  is 5.2 x
102  per mmol/kg/day.  This places chlordane  in  the upper middle  quartile of
                                       5-18

-------
TABLE 36.  HUMAN POTENCY ESTIMATES BY CHEMICAL
Chemical
Chlordane
Chlordane
Chlordane
Chlordane
Chlordane

Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
epoxide
Heptachlor
epoxide
Heptachlor
epoxide
Heptachl or
epoxide
Heptachlor
epoxide
Sex,
species,
strain
Male mice
CD-I
Female mice
CD-I
Male mice
B6C3F!
Female mice
B6C3F!
Male rats
F344

Male mice
C3H
Female mice
C3H
Male mice
B6C3F!
Female mice
B6C3F-L
Male mice
C3H
Female mice
C3H
Female mice
CD-I
Male mice
CD-I
Female rats
CFN
Tumor
site, Potency
type (mg/kg/day)-1 Reference
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
adenoma and
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
Liver,
carcinoma
4.74
2.98
0.76
0.25
1.11

12.4
14.9
2.79
0.83
27.7
36.2
1.04
6.48
5.76
IRDC (1973a)
IRDC (1973a)
NCI (1977a)
NCI (1977 a)
RIASBT (1983b)

Davis (.1965)/
Reuber
Davis (1965)/
Reuber
NCI (1977b)
NCI (1977b.)
Davis (1965)/
Reuber
Davis (1965)/
Reuber
IRDC (1973b)/
Reuber
IRDC (1973b)/
Reuber
Witherup et al .
(1959) /Reuber
                    5-19

-------
suspect carcinogens ranked by CA6.
     The unit risk in air, which is the potency expressed in terms of pg/.m3
ambient air concentration, is used to estimate risk when exposures are ex-
pressed as air concentrations.  The unit risk in air is the increased cancer
                                                                          o
risJs to a person who throughout life breathes air contaminated with 1 pg/m-3
of a pollutant.  With a linear dose-response curve, risks at any concentration
can be computed by multiplying the unit ri.sk by the concentration.  The unit
risk is computed by converting a  1 pg/m3 concentration.to a mg/kg/day dose
and then multiplying by the  potency.  For a 70-kg person, who, breathes 20 m3 a
day, an air concentration of  1 pg/m3 is equivalent to  a  dose of:,

         (1 pg/m3)  (10-3 mg/pg)  (20 m3/day) /  (70 kg) = 2.9  x 10-4 mg/kg/day.

Multiplying  this  dose  by  the potencies  calculated  above  gives  unit  risks  of
3.7  x  ID'4 per pg/m3 for  the general population  and  1.3  x  1Q-3 per  pg/m3  for
sensitive subpopulations.
     The unit risk in  water, which is  the  potency  expressed in terms of  pg/L
drinking water concentrations,  is used to  estimate risk  .when  exposures are
 expressed as water concentrations.  The unit risk  in water is  the increased
 cancer risk  to a person who throughout life  drinks water contaminated with
 1 yg/L of a  pollutant.  With a linear dose-response curve, risks at any  con-
 centration can be computed by multiplying  the. unit risk by the concentration.
 The unit risk is computed by converting a  1  pg/L concentration to a mg/kg/day
 dose and then multiplying by the potency.   For a 70-kg person who drinks 2 L
 a day, a water concentration of  1 pg/L is  equivalent to a dose of:

          (1  pg/L) (10-3 mg/pg) (2 L/day) / (70 kg) =  2.9 x 10-5 mg/kg/day.
                                        5-20

-------
 Multiplying this dose by the potencies calculated above gives  unit  risks  of
 3.7 x ID-5 per yg/L for the general  population and 1.3 x 10'4  per yg/L  for
 sensitive subpopulations.
 5.4.2.  Heptachlor
      Four data sets involve heptachlor:   male  and female C3H mice,  and  male arid
 female B6C3F1 mice.  The most sensitive  sex  and strain tested  is  female C3H
 mice.  From these,  the potency is  estimated  at 14.9  per mg/kg/day.
      The most sensitive species tested is  mice.   There are four potency esti-
 mates, ranging from 14.9 down to 0.83  per  mg/kg/day, with a geometric mean  of
 4.5 per mg/kg/day.   Because humans may be  as sensitive as the most  sensitive
 animal species,  the potency for the  general  population is estimated at  4.5  per
 mg/kg/day.
      These  estimates  are plausible upper bounds for the  increased cancer risk
 from heptachlor, meaning that  the true risk  is  not likely to exceed these es-
 timates  and  may  be  lower.    These estimates supersede  the potency of 3.37 per
 mg/kg/day previously  calculated  by the EPA (U.S. EPA,  1980b).
      The molecular  potency  index for heptachlor is 1.7 x 103 per mmol/kg/day.
 This  places  heptachlor  in the  upper middle quartile of suspect  carcinogens
 ranked by the  CA6.
      The unit  risk  in air is 1.3 x lO"3 per yg/m3 for the general  population
 and 4.3 x lO"3 per  yg/m3  for sensitive subpopulations.   The  unit risk  in water
 is  1.3 x 10-4  per yg/L for the general  population and 4.3 x  10-4 per yg/L for
 sensitive subpopulations.
 5.4.3.  Heptachlor Epoxide
     Five data sets involve heptachlor epoxide:  male and female C3H mice, male
and female CD-I mice, and female CFN  rats.   The most  sensitive  sex and strain
tested is female C3H mice.  From these  the potency is estimated  at 36.2  per
                                      5-21

-------
mg/kg/day.
     The most sensitive species tested is mice.  There are four potency esti-
mates, ranging from 36.2 down to 1.0 per mg/kg/day, with a geometric mean  of
9.1 per mg/kg/day.  This geometric mean from mice is consistent with the potency
estimate from rats of 5.8 per mg/kg/day.  Because humans may"be"as sensitive as
the most sensitive animal species, the potency for the general  population  is
estimated at 9.1 per mg/kg/day.
     These estimates are plausible upper bounds for the increased cancer risk
from heptachlor epoxide, meaning that the true risk is not likely to exceed
these estimates and may be lower.  These estimates supersede the potency of
57.86 per mg/kg/day previously calculated by the EPA (U.S. EPA, 1985a).
     The molecular potency index for heptachlor epoxide is 3.5  x 103 per mmol/
kg/day.  This places heptachlor epoxide in the most potent quartile of suspect
carcinogens ranked by CAG.
     The unit risk in air is 2.6 x 10~3 per yg/m3 for the general population
and 1.0 x 10~2 per yg/m3 for sensitive subpopulations.  The unit risk in water
is 2.6 x 10.-4 per yg/L for the general population and 1.0 x 10~3 per yg/L  for
sensitive subpopulations.
                                      5-22

-------
                                  6.  SUMMARY

6.1.  QUALITATIVE DATA
6.1.1.  Human Studies
6.1.1.1.  Case Reports—There were 11 case reports involving CNS effects where
                                                    ,         .-••*. ;rdr-.-
the author looked at the toxic effects of chlordane/heptachlor, eight case
                                     " .                         •   .      i   f, •
studies involving blood dyscrasias,  and five case studies of neuroblastomas in
children with pre-/postnatal exposure to chlordane or heptachlor.  The blood
dyscrasias in children included four cases of aplastic anemia and one case each
of refractory megaloblastic anemia,  acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute stem-
cell leukemia, and acute myelomonocytic leukemia.
                                                                       ».•-...-;•
6.1.1.2.  Epidemiologic Studies—Three epidemic!ogic studies of workers exposed
to chlordane and/or heptachlor have  been reported.  One of these studies, con-
ducted in chlordane/heptachlor applicators, was considered inadequate in sample
size and duration of follow-up since initial  exposure.  However, this study
showed increased mortality from bladder cancer (SMR = 277, p <  0.05).  A second
study showed an increased mortality  from lung cancer (SMR = 134), but the
increase was not statistically significant.  The mortality from cerebrovascular
disease was statistically significant (SMR = 183, p <_ 0.05).  Of the 1,043 men
involved in the study, only one liver cancer was reported.  The third study
involved 2,141 workers exposed to organochlorine pesticides.  One of the four
plants involved in pesticide manufacture produced chlordane and one produced
heptachlor.   The SMR for malignant neoplasms  was 69 at the chlordane plant and
91 at the heptachlor plant.  There was an excess risk for cancer in various
tissues; none was statistically significant.   The last two studies  were carried
out in chlordane/heptachlor manufacturing plants.
                                      6-1

-------
     All of these studies have several  limitations.   Neither the quantitative
nor length of exposure histories are available for chlordane/heptachlor for
the populations studied.  They were also exposed to other pesticides and chem-
icals.  Adjustments for these other chemical  exposures and other confounding
factors, like smoking and alcohol consumption, were not considered in any of
these studies.  All of the study populations  were small.  In the pesticide
applicator study, individual follow-up was not undertaken and the data were
missing on 10.3 percent of the decedents reported by the Social  Security Admin-
istration.
     Because of these methodological limitations and the limited data, it is
difficult to establish either a negative or positive association between chlor-
dane/heptachlor and carcinogenicity.  Hence,  these studies are considered in-
adequate epidemiologic evidence.
6.1.2.  Animal Studies
6.1.2.1.  Chlordane
6.1.2.1.1.  Mice.  Four chlordane carcinogenesis bioassays in mice have been
reported.  The strains tested include C57B1/6N, CD-I, B6C3F1, and ICR.  In
C57B1/6N mice fed 25 or 50 ppm for 18 months, hepatocellular carcinomas were
observed in 27 percent  (16) of the survivors.  This mouse strain rarely devel-
ops spontaneous liver lesions.  For CD-I mice fed 5, 25, or 50 ppm for 18
months, liver nodules/hepatocellular carcinomas were observed in the 25 and  50
ppm groups.  In B6C3F1 mice fed approximately 30 and 60 ppm for 80 weeks and
then held for 10 weeks, hepatocellular carcinomas were observed in both males
and females.  For  ICR mice fed 1, 5, or 12.5 ppm for 24 months, hepatocellular
adenomas and hemangiomas were significantly increased (p < 0.001) in males
receiving 12.5 ppm and  nonneoplastic liver lesions were present in males fed 5
ppm and in females fed  5 or 12.5 ppm.
                                      6-2

-------
 6.1.2.1.2.  Rats.  Four chlordane carcinogenesis bioassays in rats have been
 reported;  The strains tested include albino, Osborne-Mendel, and Fischer 344.
 Three of these studies were considered adequate, and one was inadequate.  In
 albino rats fed 10, 20, 40, 80, 160,,320, 640, or 1280 ppm for 400 days, there
 were.no treatment-related tumors. .In Osborne-Mendel rats fed 5, 10, 30,, i&O,
 or 300 pprtr for 2 years, hepatic toxicity was noted at 150 and 300 ppm, ,bufe,no
 liver tumors were noted.  In Osborne-Mendel  rats fed 203.5 or 407 ppm (males)
 or 120.8 or 241.5 ppm (females), respectively, for 80 weeks and held for an
 additional  29 weeks,  no liver tumors were noted, but thyroid tumors  were sig-
 nificantly  increased.   In light of historical  data for Osborne-Mendel  rats,  the
 thyroid tumors were not considered to be treatment-related.  In  Fischer 344;
 rats fed 1,; 5, or 25  ppm for 130 weeks,  there  was a  statistically significant
 increase in  hepatocellular adenomas, which was considered by  the authors as
 weak evidence  for carcinogenicity in males fed 25 ppm.   Hepatocellular swelling
 was  significant  in females fed  25 ppm.   The  hepatocellular adenomas  occurred
 only in  males  surviving longer  than  104  weeks.
 6.1.2.2.  :Heptach1or/Heptachlbr  Epoxide
 6.1.2.2.1.  Mice.   Three heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide carcincgenesis  bioassays
 in mice  have been  reported.  The  strains  studied  include  C3H, B6C3F1,  a'nd CD-I
mice.   In C3H mice  fed  10  ppm of both heptachlor  and heptachlor epoxide  for 2
years, benign liver tumors/hepatocellular carcinomas were  reported in both
male and female mice.  Hepatocellular carcinomas  in treated groups were gen-
erally large and frequently multiple tumors,  especially in the epoxide group in
respect to the controls.  For B6C3F1 mice fed technical grade (containing 22
percent chlordane) at concentrations of 6.1 or 13.8 ppm (males)  or 9  or-ISrppm
(females^ respectively, for 80 weeks and held for an additional  10 weeks^
hepatocellular carcinomas were significantly  (p < 0.001)  increased in both::male
                                      6-3

-------
and female mice.  In CD-I mice fed a mixture of heptachlor  epoxide/heptachlor
(75:25) at concentrations of 1, 5, or 10 ppm for 18 months,  nodular hyperplasia/
hepatocellular carcinomas were noted at 5 and 10 ppm  in  both male  and  female
mice.
6.1.2;.2.2.  Rats.  Five heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide carcinogenesis bioassays
in rats have been conducted.  The strains of rats studied  include  Wistar,
Osborne-Mendel, CD, and CFN.  In Wistar rats given 5  doses.of  10 mg/kg bw  of
heptachlor and held for 106 to 110 weeks, no treatment-related tumors  were ob-
served.  For Osborne-Mendel rats fed technical grade  heptachlor at concentra-
tions of 38.9 or 77.9 (males) or 25.7 or 51.3 (females)  ppm, respectively, for
80 weeks and held for 30 weeks, no liver tumors were  noted, although  neoplas-
tic nodules were found in both treated and control rats.  In CD rats fed  a
mixture of heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide (75:25) at concentrations of  5,  7.5,
10, or 12.5 ppm for 2 years, no liver tumors were noted, although  nonneoplas-
tic lesions were noted in the  livers of  rats fed 7.5, 10,  or 12.5  ppm.  In one
study using CFN rats fed  1.5,  3,  5,  7, or 10 ppm of heptachlor for 110 weeks,
the  incidence of liver tumors  was  not  statistically different in treated and
control animals.   In a second  study  using CFN rats fed 0.5, 2.5,  5, 7.5,  or 10
ppm  of heptachlor  epoxide  for  108  weeks, treatment-related  liver carcinomas
were noted by several pathologists.
6.1.3.  Supporting  Evidence
6.1.3.1.   Mutagenicity—The published  literature  on mutagenicity tests of chlor-
dane and  heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide is quite  similar, with most studies
 reporting results  on  both chemicals.  Generally,  the  results  have indicated
that these chemicals  are not mutagenic in bacteria or in mammalian cells  in
 culture,  and do not induce DNA repair, as measured by unscheduled DNA synthesis
 in rodent hepatocytes.   While dominant lethal  tests  in  mice have  been negative
                                       6-4

-------
for both chemicals, the absence of direct cytogenetic tests in both germinal
and somatic cells precludes a conclusion as to their potential for causing
chromosomal aberrations.
6.1.3.2.  Structural Relationship—Three compounds, structurally related to
chlordane/heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide, have induced malignant liver tumof-s  in
animals.  Aldrin, dieldrin, and chlorendic acid have produced liver tumors"6fn
mice and chlorendic acid has also produced liver tumors in rats.
6.2.  QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
     In the absence of information on human absorption, tissue distribution,
metabolism, and excretion, this assessment makes no adjustment for potential
differences between animals and humans.
6.2.1.  Chlordane
     Five data sets involve chlordane:  male and female CD-I mice, male and fe-
male B6C3F1 mice, and male F344 rats.  The most sensitive sex and strain tested
is male CD-I mice.  From these, the potency is estimated at 4.7 per mg/kg/day.
     The most sensitive species tested is mice.  There are four potency esti-
mates,  ranging from 4.7 down to 0.25 per mg/kg/day, with a geometric mean of
1.3 per mg/kg/day.  This geometric mean from mice is consistent with potency
estimate from rats of 1.1 per mg/kg/day.  Because humans may be as sensitive
as the most sensitive animal species, the potency for the general population is
estimated at 1.3 per mg/kg/day.
     These estimates are plausible upper bounds for the increased cancer risk
from chlordane, meaning that the true risk is not likely to exceed these esti-
mates and may be lower.  These estimates supersede the potency of 1.61 per
mg/kg/day previously calculated by the EPA (U.S. EPA, 1980a).
     The molecular potency index, which is the potency expressed in terms of
molecular weight, has been used to rank suspect carcinogens according to po-
                                      6-5

-------
tency.  The index is computed by multiplying the general-population potency by
the molecular weight.  The molecular potency index for chlordane is 5.2,,x 10^ ;.
per mmol/kg/day.  This places chlordane in the upper middle quartile ,of ,suspect
carcinogens ranked by CAG.                                            •     -.*,««
6.2.2?  Heptachlor
     Four data sets involve heptachlor:  male and female C3H mice, and;male'.and
female B6C3F1 mice.  The most sensitive sex and strain tested is-female C3H
mice.  From these, the potency is estimated at 14.9 per mg/kg/day.     ,
     The most sensitive species tested is mice.  There are four potency esti-
mates, ranging from 14.9 down to 0.83 per mg/kg/day, with a^geometric mean of
4.5 per mg/kg/day.  Because humans may be as sensitive as the most sensitive ,.,
animal species, the potency for the general population is estimated at 4.5 per
mg/kg/day.
     These estimates are plausible upper bounds for the increased cancer risk
from heptachlor, meaning that the true risk is not likely to exceed these
estimates and may be lower.  These estimates supersede the potency of 3.37 per
mg/kg/day previously calculated by EPA (U.S. EPA, 1980b).
     The molecular potency index for heptachlor is 1.7 x 103 per mmol/kg/day.
This places heptachlor in the upper middle quartile of suspect carcinogens
ranked by CAG.
6.2.3.  Heptachlor Epoxide
     Five data sets involve heptachlor epoxide:  male and female C3H mice, male
and female CD-I mice, and female CFN rats.  The most sensitive sex and strain
tested is female C3H mice.  From these, the potency is estimated at 36.2 per
mg/kg/day.
     The most sensitive species tested is mice.  There are four potency esti-
mates, ranging from 36.2 down to 1.0 per mg/kg/day, with a geometric mean of
                                      6-6

-------
9.1 per mg/kg/day.  This geometric mean from mice is consistent with the potency
estimate from rats of 5.8 per mg/kg/day.  Because humans may be as sensitive as
the most sensitive animal species, the potency for the general  population is
estimated at 9.1 per mg/kg/day.
     These estimates are plausible upper bounds for the increased cancer Ri-sk
from heptachlor epoxide, meaning that the true risk is not likely to exceed
these estimates and may be lower.  These estimates supersede the potency of
57.86 per mg/kg/day previously calculated by the EPA (U.S. EPA, 1985a).
     The molecular potency index for heptachlor epoxide is 3.5  x 10^ per mmol/
kg/day.  This places heptachlor epoxide in the most potent quartile of suspect
carcinogens ranked by the CAG.
                                      6-7

-------

-------
                                     REFERENCES
Ahmed,  F.E.; Hart, R.W.; Lewis, N.J.  (1977a)  Pesticide induced DNA damage and
     its  repair in cultured human cells.  Mutat. Res. 42:161-174.

Ahmed,  F.E.; Lewis, N.J.; Hart, R.W.  (1977b)  Pesticide induced ouabain resis-
     tant mutants in Chinese hamster V79 cells.  Chem. Biol. Interact. 19:369-
     374.

Aldrich, F.D.; Holmes, J.H.  (1969)  Acute chlordane intoxication in a child.
     Arch. Environ. Health 19:129.

Ambrose, A.M.; Christensen, H.E.; Robbins, D.J.; Rather, L.J.  (1953a)  lexico-
     logical and pharmacological studies on chlordane.  Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med.
     7:197-210.

Ambrose, A.M.; Christensen, H.C.; Robbins, D.J.  (1953b)  Pharmacological  ob-
     servations on chlordane.  Fed. Proc. Am. Soc. Exp.  Biol. 12:298.

Anonymous.  (1962)  Registry on blood dyscrasias: report to council.  J. Am.
     Med. Assoc. 179:888-890

Arnold, D.W.; Kennedy, G.L. Jr.; Keplinger, M.L.; Calandra, J.C.; Calo,  C.J.
     (1977)  Dominant lethal studies with technical  chlordane,  HCS-3260  and
     heptachlor:heptachlor epoxide.  J.  Toxicol. Environ. Health  2:547-555.

Arthur, R.D.; Cain, J.D.; Barrentine, B.F.  (1975)   The  effect  of atmospheric
     levels of pesticides on pesticide residues in rabbit adipose tissue and
     blood sera.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 14:760.

Ashwood-Smith, M.; Trevino, J.; Ring, R.  (1972)  Mutagenicity  of dichlorvos.
     Nature 240:482-520.

Balba,  H.M.; Saha, J.G.  (1978)  Studies on the distribution, excretion  and
     metabolism of alpha and gamma isomers of [14C]  chlordane in  rabbits.   J.
     Environ. Sci. Health B13(3):211-233.

Barnes, R.  (1967)  Poisoning by the insecticide chlordane.   Med.  J.  Aust.  54:
     972.

Barnett, J.R.; Dorough, H.W.  (1974)  Metabolism of  chlordane in  rats.   J.
     Agric. Food Chem. 22:612-619.

Becker, F.F.;  Sell,  S.  (1979)   Alpha-fetoprotein levels  in  hepatic  alterations
     during chemical  carcinogenesis in C57BL/6N mice.  Cancer Res. 39:3491-3494.

Benes,  V.; Sram, R.   (1969)   Mutagenic activity of some  pesticides in Drosophila
     melanogaster.  Ind.  Med.  38:50-52.
                                      7-1

-------
Bernstein, U, Gold, L.S.; Ames, B.N.; Pike, M.C.;  Hoel,  D.6.   (1985)   Some
     tautologous aspects of the comparison of carcinogenic potency in  rats and
     mice.  Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 5:79-86.

Blevins, R.D.; Sholes, I.E.  (1978)  Response of HeLa cells to selected pesti-
     cides and hallucinogens.  Growth 42(4):478-485.

Boyd, E.M.; Taylor, F.I.  (1969)  The acute oral toxicity of chlordane in albi-
     no rats.  Ind. Med. 38:42.

Brandt, W.; Flauim, W.; Bernheim, N.  (1977)  The value  of hydroxyureas in
     assessing repair synthesis of DNA in HeLa cells.  Chem.-Biol. Interact.  5:
     327-339.

Bresch, H.; Arendt, U.  (1977)  Influence of different organochlorine  pesti-
     cides on the development of the sea urchin embryo.   Environ. Res. 13:
     121-128.

Brimfield, A.A.; Street, J.C.; Futrell, J.; Chatfield, D.A.  (1978)  Identifi-
     cation of products arising from the metabolism of cis- and transchlordane
     in rat liver microsomes in vitro; outline of a possible metabolic pathway.
     Pestic. Biochem. Physio!. 9(l):84-95.

Brodie, B.B.   (1962)  Part VI.  Difficulties in extrapolating data on  metabolism
     of drugs from animal to man.  Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 3(3):374.

Brooks, G.T.; Lewis, S.E.; Harrison, A.   (1968)  Selective metabolism of cyclo-
     diene insecticide  enantiomers by pig liver microsomal enzymes.  Nature
     (London) 220:1034-1035.

Brooks, G.T.; Harrison, A.; Lewis, S.E.   (1970)  Cyclodiene epoxide ring hydra-
     tion by microsomes from mammalian liver and houseflies.  Biochem. Pharmacol.
     19:255-273.

Cabral, J.R.; Testa, M.C.; Terracini, B.   (1972)  Lack of long-term effects of
     the  administration of heptachlor to  suckling rats.  Tumori 58:49-53.
     (Ita., Eng. Abstr.)

Cavender, F.;  Salasin,  J.   (1982)  Analysis of  human inhaled dose estimates
     from animal oral dose data on selected chemicals.  WP-82W00403.  The MITRE
     Corporation, McLean,  VA.

Cerey,  K.; Izakovrc,  V.;  Ruttkay-Nedecka, J.   (1973)  Effects of heptachlor on
     dominant  lethality and  bone  marrow  in  rats.  Mutat. Res. 21:26.

Conney, A.H.;  Coutinho, C.;  Koechlin, B.; Swarm, R.; Cheripko, J.A.;
     Impellizzeri,  C.;  Baruth,  H.   (1974)   From animals to man: metabolic
     considerations.  Clin.   Pharmacol.  Ther.  16:176.

Curley, A; Garrettson,  L.K.   (1969)   Acute  chlordane poisoning.  Arch. Environ.
     Health  18:  211-215.
                                       7-2

-------
Curley, A.; Copeland, M.F.; Kimbrough, R.K.   (1969)   Chlorinated hydrocarbon
     insecticides in organs of stillborn and blood of newborn babies.   Arch.
     Environ. Health 19:628-632.

Dadey, J.L.; Kammer, A G.  (1953)  Chlordane intoxication.   ,J. Am.  Med. Assoc.
     153:723.                                                             _   '  '

Davidow, B.; Radomski, J.L.  (1953)  Isolation of an epoxide metabolite from   .
      fat tissues of dogs fed heptachlor.  J. Pharmacol.  Exp. then. 107:259.  '

Davis, H.J.  (1965, July 19)  Pathology report on mice fed  aldrin,  dieldrin?,K
     heptachlor. or .heptachlor epoxide for two years.  Internal FDA  memorandum
     to Dr. A.J. Lehman.

Deichmann, W.B.; Keplinger, M.L.  (1966)  Effect of combinations of pesticides
     on reproduction of mice.  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.  8:337-338.

Derbes, V.J.; Dent, J.H.; Forrest, W.W.; Johnson, M.F.  (1955)  Fatal  chlordane
     poisoning.  J. Am. Med. Assoc. 158:1367-1369.

Ditraglia, D.; Brown, D.P.; Namekata, T.; Iverson, N.  (1981)  Mortality "study
     of workers employed at organochlorine pesticide manufacturing  plants.
     Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 7 (Suppl. 4):140-146.

Ermakov, V.V.  (1977)  Metabolism of heptachlor and dilor in animals.   S-kh/
     Biol. 12(3):402-411.  (Rus.)  CA 87:128395w'

Fishbein, W.I.; White, J.V.; Isaacs, H.J.   (1964)  Survey of workers exposed
     to chlordane.  Ind. Med. Surg. 33:726-727.         ,

Forrest, I.S.; Aber, R.C.  (1968)  Metabolic pathways for the detoxication of
     chlorpromazine in various mammalian species.  Agressologie 9(2):259.
     Occup. Med. 6:357.

Fouts, J.R.  (1970)  Some effects of insecticides on hepatic microsomal enzymes
     in various animal species.  Rev. Can. Biol. 29:377-389.

Furie, B.; Trubowitz, S.   (1976)  Insecticides and blood dyscrasias: chlordane
     exposure and self-limited refractory megaloblastic anemia.  J. Am. Med.,
     Assoc. 235:1720-1722.

Gentile, J.M.; Gentile, G.J.; Bultman, J.; Sechriest, R.; Wagner, E.E.; Plewa,
     M.J.  (1982)  An evaluation of the genotoxic properties of insecticides.
     following plant and animal .activation.  Mutat. Res. 101(l):19-29.

Gold, L.S.; Sawyer, C.B.; Magaw, R.; Backman, G.; DeVeciana, M.; Levinson, R.,;
     Hooper, N.K.; Havender, W.R.; Bernstein, L.; Peto, R.; Pike, M.C.; Ames,
     B.N.  (1984)  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results
     of animal bioassays.  Environ. Health Perspect. 58:9-322.

Goodman, D.G.; Ward, J.M.; Squire, R.A.; Paxton, M.B.; Reichardt, W.D.; Chu,
     K.C.; Linhart, M.S.   (1980)  Neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions in  aging
     Osborne-Mendel rats.  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 55:433-447.
                                      7-3

-------
 Grant, W.   (1978)   Chromosome aberrations  in  plants  as  a  monitoring  system.
      Environ. Health Perspect. 27:37-43.

 Griffin,  D.;  Hill,  W.  (1978)  In vitro breakage  of  plasmid  DNA  by mutagens and
      pesticides.  Mutat.  Res. 52:161-169.

 Halacka,  K.;  Dvorak, M.;  Rysanek, K.;  Jagos,  P.;  Cerny, E.   (1975)   Effect of
      small  orally administered doses  of heptachlor on ultrastructure of hepa-
      tocytes  and their enzyme systems  in experimental animals.   Cesk. Hyg.
      20:286-291.

 Hanley, T.; Udall,  V.; Weatherall,  M.   (1970)   An industrial view of current
      practice in predicting  drug  toxicity.  Br. J. Med. 26(3):203-207.

 Haseman, O.K.  (1985)  Issues in  carcinogenicity testing:  dose  selection.
      Fundam.  Appl.  Toxicol.  5:66-78.
 Hazardous  Substances  Data Base  (HSDB),
      of Medicine, TOXNET.
(1985)   Bethesda,  MD:  National  Library
 Huang, J.C.   (1980)   Fate of organic pesticides in the aquatic system.  Eng.
     Bull.  Purdue  Univ.  Eng. Ext. Series, pp. 449-457.

 Infante, P.F.; Epstein,  S.S.; Newton, W.A., Jr.   (1978)  Blood dyscrasias and
     childhood tumors and exposure to chlordane and heptachlor.  Scand. J. Work
     Environ. Health  4:137-150.

 Ingle, L.   (1952)  Chronic oral toxicity of chlordane to rats.  Arch. Ind. Hyg.
     Occup. Med. 6:357.

 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).  (1974)  Evaluation of car-
     cinogenic risk of chemicals to man.  Some organochloride pesticides.  Vol.
     5.  Lyon, France.

 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).  (1982)  Aldrin.  In:
     Chemicals, industrial processes and industries associated with cancer in
     humans.  IARC Monographs Supplement 4:25-27.  Lyon, France: World Health
     Organization, IARC.

 International Research and Development Corporation (IRDC).  (1973a, Dec. 14)
     Eighteen-month oral carcinogenic study in mice.   Unpublished report to
     Velsicol Chemical Corporation.

 International Research and Development Corporation (IRDC).  (1973b, Sept. 16)
     Eighteen-month oral carcinogenic study in mice.   Unpublished report to
     Velsicol Chemical Corporation.

Jolley, W.P.; Stemmer, H.L.; Pfitzer, E.A.   (1966, Jan. 28)  The effects of
     feeding diets containing a mixture of  heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide to
     female rats for two years.  Unpublished report from the Kettering Lab. to
     Velsicol Chemical Corporation.  (Cited in Epstein, 1976)
                                         7-4

-------
Kacew, S.; Sutherland, D.J.B.;  Singhal,  R.L.   (1973)   Biochemical  changes  fol-
     lowing chronic administration of heptachlor,  heptachlor  epoxide  and endrin
     to male rats.  Environ.  Physiol. Biochem.  3:221-229.

Klemmer, K.W.; Budy, A.M.; Takahasdhi , W.;  Haley,  T.J.   (1977)   Human tissue
     distribution of cyclodiene pesticides  Hawaii  1964-1973.   Clin. Toxicol.
Kutz, F.W.; Strassman, S.C.; Sperling, J.F.;  Cook,  B.T.;  Sunshine,  I.;
     Tessari , J.  (1983)  A fatal  chlordane poisoning.  J.  Toxicol .-Clin.
     Toxicol. 20(2): 167-174.

Lensky, P.; Evans, M.  (1952)  Human poisoning by chlordane.   J.  Am.  Med.
     Assoc. 149:1394.

Loge, J.P.  (1965)  Aplastic anemia following exposure  to benzene hexachloride
     (Lindane).  J. Am. Med. Assoc. 193:110-114.

Markarjan, D.S.  (1966)  Cytogenetic effect of some chlororganic  insecticides on
     mouse bone-marrow cell nuclei.  Genetika 2:132-137.

Marshall, T.C.; Borough, W.; Swim, H.E.  (1976)  Screening of pesticides for
     mutagenic potential using Salmonella typhimurium mutants.  J.  Agric.  Food
     Chem. 24:560.

Maslansky, C.J.; Williams, 6.M.  (1981)  Evidence for an  epigenetic mode of
     action in organochlorine pesticide heptacocarcinogenicity: a lack of
     genotoxicity in rat, mouse and hamster hepatocytes.   J.  Toxicol. Environ.
     Health. 8(1-2):121-130.

Matsumura, F. ; Nelson, J.O.  (1971)  Identification of the major metabolic pro-
     duct of heptachlor epoxide in rat feces.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
     5:489.

Mestitzova, M.  (1967)  On reproduction studies on the occurrence of cataracts
     in rats after long-term feeding of the insecticide heptachlor.  Experientia
     23:42-43.

Mizyukova,  I.G.; Kurchatov, G.V.   (1970)  Metabolism of heptachlor.  Farmacol .
     Toksikol.  (Moscow) 33(4):496-499.  (Rus.)  CA73:86885j.

Moriya, M.; Ohta, T.; Watanabe, K.; Miyazawa, T. ; Kato, K.; Shirasu, K.  (1983)
     Further mutagenicity  studies  on pesticides in bacterial  reversion assay
     systems.  Mutat. Res. 116(3-4):185-216.

Muirhead,  E.E.; Groves, M.; Guy, R.; Haldon, E.R.; Bass,  R.K.  (1959)  Acquired
     hemolytic anemia, exposure to insecticides and positive Coombs test depen-
     dent  on insecticide preparations.  Vox Sang. 4:277-292.   (Cited in Infante
     et a!., 1978)

Munson, R.R.   (1974)  Analysis of  relative survival and proportionate mortal-
     ity.   Comput. Biomed. Res. 7:325-332.
                                         7-5

-------
 National Academy of Sciences (NAS).  (1969)  Application of metabolic data to
      the evaluation of drugs.  Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 10(5):607-634.

 National Cancer Institute (NCI).  (1977a)  Bioassay of chlordane for possible
      carcinogenicity.  NCI Carcinogenesis Tech. Rep. Sen. No. 8.  [Also publ.
      as DREW Publication No. (NIH) 77-808].

 National Cancer Institute (NCI).  (1977b)  Bioassay of heptachlor for possible
      carcinogenicity.  NCI Carcinogenesis Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 9.  [Also publ.
      as DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 77-809].

 National Cancer Institute (NCI).  (1978)   Bioassay of endosulfan for possible
      carcinogenicity.  NCI Carcinogenesis Tech. Rep. Ser. No. 62.   [Also publ.
      as DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 78-1312].

 National Toxicology Program (NTP).  (1984)   Report of the Ad  Hoc Panel  on
      Chemical  Carcinogenesis Testing and  Evaluation.  Research  Triangle Park,
      NC, p.  280.

 National Toxicology Program (NTP).  (1985a)  Report of the Ad Hoc  Panel  on
      Chemical  Carcinogenesis Testing and  Evaluation.  Research  Triangle
      Park, NC,  p.  280.

 National  Toxicology Program (NTP).  (1985b)  Bioassay of  chlorendic  acid  for
      possible  carcinogenicity.   DHEW Publication  No. (NIH)  85-2560.   National
      Toxicology Program  Carcinogenesis Technical  Report Series,  No.  304.

 Neal, R.A.   (1983)   Design  of carcinogenicity  studies,  dose selection,  route,
      blood levels,  transformation.   Toxicol.  Pathol.  11(1):48.

 Nye,  D.E.; Dorough,  H.W.   (1976)   Fate of insecticides  administered  endo-
     treacheally to  rats.   Bull. Environ. Contam.  Toxicol.  15:291.

 Oehme,  F.W.  (1970)   Species  differences:   the basis  for  and  importance of
     comparative toxicology.  Clin.  Toxicol. 3(1):5-10.

 Plewa, M.  (1982)  Specific-locus  mutation  assays  in  Zea  Mays.  A report of
     QQ?O     Environmental  Protection Agency Gene-ToxTrogram.  Mutat. Res.
     y y • C/JL / **o j /»

Polen, P.B.; Hester, M.; Benzinger, J.  (1971)  Characterization of oxychlor-
     dane, animal  metabolite  of chlordane.  Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
     5:521.

Poonawalla, N.H.;  Korte, F.   (1971)  Metabolism of trans-chlordane-^C and
     isolation and identification of its metabolites from the urine of rabbits.
     J.  Agric. Food Chem. 19(3):467-470.

Probst,  G.S.; McMahon, R.E.; Hill,  L.E.; Thompson, C.Z.; Epp,  J.K.; Neal, S.B.
     (1981)  Chemically-induced unscheduled DNA synthesis in primary rat hepa-
     tocyte cultures:  A comparison with bacterial mutagenicity using 218 com-
     pounds.   Environ. Mutagen.  3(l):ll-32.
                                         7-6

-------
Prout, M.S.; Provan, W.M.; Green, T.   (1985)   Species  differences  in  response
     to trichloroethylene.  1. Pharmacokinetics in rats and mice.   Toxicol.
     Appl. Pharmacol. 79:389-400.

Radomski, J.L.; Davidow, B.  (1953)  The metabolite of heptachlor, its  estima-
     tion, storage and toxicity.  0.  Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.  107:226.

Research Institute for Animal Science in Biochemistry and Toxicology  (Japan)
      (RIASBT)  (1983a, Dec. 1)  Chlordane chronic feeding study in mice.
     Unpublished report prepared for  Velsicol  Chemical Corporation.

Research Institute for Animal Science in Biochemistry and Toxicology  (Japan)
      (RIASBT)  (1983b, Dec. 1)  Technical chlordane chronic feeding study in
      rats.  Unpublished report prepared for Velsicol Chemical Corporation.

Reuber, M.D.   (1977a)  Hepatic vein thrombosis in mice ingesting chlorinated
      hydrocarbons.  Arch. Toxicol. 38:163-168.

Reuber, M.D.   (1977b)  Histopathology of carcinomas of the liver in mice inges-
      ting heptachlor or heptachlor epoxide.  Exp. Cell Biol. 45:147-157.

Reuber, M.D.   (1978)   Carcinomas and other lesions of the liver in mice inges-
      ting organochlorine  pesticides.  Clin. Toxicol.  13(2):231-256.  [Also
      available as Reuber, M.D.  (1979) Toxicol. Annu.  3:231-256].

Savage,  E.P.;  Tessari,  J.D.;  Malberg, J.W.; Wheeler,  H.W.; Bagby,  J.R.   (1973)
      Organochlorine  pesticide  residues  and polychlorinated biphenyls in human
      milk,  Colorado  1971-1972.   Pestic.  Monit. J.  7:1-5.

Savage,  E.P.;  Kiefe, T.J.;  Tessari,  J.D.; Wheeler,  H.W.; Applehaus, F.M.;
      Goes,  E.A.;  Ford, S.A.  (1981)  National  study of chlorinated hydrocarbon
      insecticide  residues in  human milk, USA.  Am.  J.  Epidemiol.  113(14):413-
      422.

Shain, S.A.;  Shaeffer, J.C.;  Boesel, R.W.   (1977)   The effect  of  chronic  inges-
      tion of selected  pesticides upon  rat  ventral  prostate  homeostasis.   Toxicol
      Appl.  Pharmacol.  40(1):115-130.

 Shirasu, Y.; Moriya, M.;  Kato, K.; Furuhashi,  A.;  Kada,  T.   (1976)  Mutagen-
      icity screening of pesticides in  the  microbial  system.  Mutat.  Res.
      40:19-30.

 Simmon, V.; Kauhaven,  K.; Mortelmans,  K.;  Tardiff, R.  (1978)   Mutagenic activ-
      ity of chemicals identified in  drinking  water.  Mutat.  Res.  53(2):262-263.

 Sontag, J.M.; Page, N.P.; Saffiotti, U.  (1976)   Guidelines for carcinogen bio-
      assay in small rodents.  NCI-CG-TR-1/DHEW Publication No. (NIH)76-801.
      National Cancer Institute, Bethesda,  MD.

 Stohlman, E.F.; Thorp, W.S.; Smith,  M.F.  (1950)  Toxic  action of chlordane.
      Arch. Ind. Hyg. 1:13.

 Strassman, S.C.; Kutz, F.W.   (1977)   Insecticide residues  in human milk from
      Arkansas and Mississippi, 1973-1974.   Pestic. Monit.  J. 10:130-133.

                                       7-7

-------
 Street, J.E.; Blau, S.E.  (1972)  Oxychlordane:  accumulation  in  rat  adipose
      tissue on feeding chlordane isomers  or technical  chlordane.   J.  Aqric.
      Food Chem. 20:395-397.

 Takei, G.H.;  Kauahikua, S.M.;  Leong, G.H.   (1983)   Analysis of milk  samples
      collected in Hawaii for residues of  organochlorine  pesticides and  PCBs.
      Bull. Environ. Contam.  Toxicol. 30:606-606B.

 Tashiro,  S.;  Matsumura, F.   (1977)   Metabolic  routes of  cis-  and transchlordane
      in rats.  J. Agric. Food  Chem.  25:872-880.

 Tashiro,  S.;  Matsumura, F.   (1978)   Metabolism of trans-nonachlor and related
      chlordane components in rat and man.   Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
 Tong,  C.;  Fazio,  M.;  Williams,  G.   (1981)  Rat  hepatocyte-mediated mutagenesis
     of  human  cells by  carcinogenic  polycyclic  aromatic hydrocarbons but not
     organic  pesticides.   Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol. Med. 167:572-575.

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   (1977, Mar. 28)  Risk assessment of
     chlordane and heptachlor.   Prepared by the Carcinogen Assessment Group.
     Office of Health and  Environmental Assessment.

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   (1980a)  Ambient water quality criteria
     document  for chlordane.  Prepared  by the Office of Health and Environmental
     Assessment,  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati,
     OH, for the  Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC.
     EPA-440/4-80-027.  NTIS PB 81-117384.

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   (1980b)  Ambient water quality criteria
     document  for heptachlor.  Prepared by the Office of Health and Environmental
     Assessment,  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati,  OH,
     for the Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC.
     EPA-440/4-80-052.  NTIS PB 81-117632.

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   (1984)  Health assessment document for
     hexachlorocyclopentadiene.  Office of Health and Environmental  Assessment.
     EPA-600/8-84-001F.  NTIS PB 85-124915.

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   (1985a, Mar.)   Drinking water criteria
     document  for heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide and  chlordane.  Prepared by
     the Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental  Criteria
     and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH, for the Office of Drinking Water,
     Washington, DC.   Final Draft.   EPA-600/X-84-197-1.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  (1985b)  Hearing files on chlordane,
     heptachlor suspension [unpublished draft].   Available for inspection at:
     U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Washington,  DC.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   (1986)   Guidelines  for carcinogen  risk
     assessment.  Federal  Register  51(185):33992-34003.
                                      7-8

-------
Velsicol  Chemical  Corporation.  (1983a, Dec.  1)   Yonemura,  T.;  Takamura,.F.;
     Takahashi, Y.  Thirty-month chronic toxicity and tumorigenicity test in
     rats by chlordane technical.  (Unpublished  study by Research Institute
     for Animal Science in Biochemistry and Toxicology, Japan.   Chicago,  IL.
     Accession No. 252267.)                                               ^

Velsicol  Chemical  Corporation.  (1983b, Dec.  1)   Inui, S.;  Yamazaki, K.;   .
     Yonemura, T;  et al.   Twenty-four month chronic toxicity and tumorigeni-
     city test in  mice by chlordane technical.  (Unpublished study by Research
     Institute for Animal Science in Biochemistry and Toxicology, Japan.
     Chicago, IL.  Accession Nos. 254665 and 251815.-)                      "

Velsicol  Chemical  Corporation.  (1984, June 16)   Hardy, C.J.; et al.  Chlordane:
     a 90-day inhalation toxicity study in the rat and monkey.   Unpublished
     study by Huntingdon Research Centre.                                ,,

Vettorazzi , A.G.  (1975)  Toxicological decisions and recommendations result-
     ing from the  safety assessment of pesticide residues ,in food.  Crit. Rev.
     Toxicol. 4:125-183.                                                  ;/.;

Wang, H.H.; MacMahon, B.  (1979a)  Mortality of workers employed in the manu-
     facture of chlordane and heptachlor.  J.  Occup. Med. 21:745-748.

Wang, H.H.; MacMahon, B.  (1979b)  Mortality of pesticide workers.  J.  Occup.
     Med. 21:741-744.                                   ,                  ''

Wasserman, M.; Nogueira, D.P.; Tomatis, L. et al.  (1972)  Storage of organo-
     chlorine insecticides in people of Sao Paulo, Brazil.   Ind. Med. 41:22.

Wasserman, M.; Tomatis, L.; Wasserman, D. et al.  (1974)  Epidemiology of
     organochlorine insecticides in the adipose  tissue of Israelis.   Pestic.
     Monit. J. 8:1.

Wazeter, F.X.  (1967)  Unpublished report.  (Cited in Vettorazzi, 1975)

Welch, R.M.; Levin, W.; Kuntzman, R.; Jacobson,  M.; Conney, A.H.  (1971)   Ef-
     fect of halogenated hydrocarbon insecticides on the metabolism and  utero-
     tropic action of estrogen in rats and mice.  Toxicol.  Appl. Pharmacol. 19:
     234-246.

Witherup, S.; Cleveland, P.P.; Shaffer, F.G.;  Schlecht, H.; Musen, L.  (1955,
     Aug. 17)  The physiological effects of the  introduction of heptachlor
     into the diet of experimental animals in varying levels of concentration.
     Unpublished report from the Kettering Laboratories to Velsicol  Chemical
     Corporation.

Witherup, S.; Cleveland, F.P.; Stemmer, K.  (1959, Nov. 10)  The physiological
     effects of the introduction of heptachlor epoxide in the varying levels of
     concentration into the diet of CFN rats.  Unpublished report from the
     Kettering Lab. to Velsicol Chemical Corporation.
Yamaguchi, I.; Matsumura, F.; Kadous,
     ATPases by heptachlor epoxide in
     ll(l-3):285-293.
A.A.  (1979)  Inhibition of synaptic
rat brain.  Pestic. Biochem. Physio!.


7-9

-------
r
             Zapp, J.A., Jr.  (1977)  Extrapolation of animal Studies to the human situation.
                  J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2:1425-1433.

             Zavon, M.R.; Tye, R.; Latorfe, L.  (1969)  Chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticide
                  content of the heonate.  Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 160:196-200.
                                                   7-10

-------
                        APPENDIX A
!' I    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCV

  r                 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                                      OFFICE OF
                                              PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT
FROM:
TO:
THRU
The Mutagenicity Assessment (GENE-TOX PROFILE) of
Chlordane - Addendum to the Registration Standard
                                     TB Projects:  OOOf/1244
                                             No
                                         174
Irving Mauer, Ph.D.
Toxicology Branch     ^
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)

Henry Spencer, Ph.D.
Toxicology Branch
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)

          and

Amy S. Rispih, Ph.D.
Science Integration Staff
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)

Judy Hauswirth, Acting Head
Section VI, Toxicology Branch
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)
     The assessment of  the mutagenicity  of  chlordane developed
here was generated from our  review of  the  available published
literature located by Dynamac  Corporation  (TB Project 1244),
as well as those articles  in the  files of  EMIC (Environmental
Mutagen Information Center at  Oak Ridge  National Laboratory)
which were employed for evaluation in  Phase I of the Agency's
GENE-TOX PROGRAM (Dr. Michael  D.  Waters, HERL/RTP).  A cursory
appraisal  ("Chlordane/Heptachlor  Mutagenicity," memorandum:
Mauer to Spencer December  16,  1985—attached as APPENDIX I)

-------
 of some  of these  assays  as  summarized by the CAG
 ("Carcinogenicity Risk Assessment of Chlordane and Heptachlor/
 Heptachlor Epoxide,"  DRAFT,  December 1985) is also incorporated
 here,  since the conclusions  in  this more comprehensive assessment
 corroborate those in  that preliminary discussion.  There
 appears  to have been  no  primary gene-tox studies submitted as
 CBI by registrants.

     Technical chlordane (CAS Registry No. 12789-03-06) is a
 complex  mixture of related,  chlorinated methanoindane compounds.*
 Approximately one-third  of  the  published studies available
 for review could  not  be  interpreted because they did not
 clearly  state the nature, purity, source, and composition of
 the material tested but  used unspecified "chlordane/commercial
 grades"  of the pesticide.   Collectively, however, results
 from over  thirty  assays  reviewed here permit at least a
 preliminary assessment of the mutagenicity potential of the
 technical/its principal  isomers.

     This  assessment  is  organized as follows:  A survey and
 discussion (with  summary tabulation), as well as evaluation
 (for regulatory purposes) of all studies located by both
 sources  (DYNAMAC,  EMIC/GENE-TOX PROGRAM) listed according to
 FIFRA  categories  of genetic  effect assayed  (gene mutation,
 chromosomal effects,  primary DNA damage/repair, and other
 mechanisms); followed by conclusions as well as recommendations
 both to  satisfy regulatory  requirements ("data gaps") and to
 indicate further  testing the results from which would be
 useful for risk assessment.
* Approximate composition  as  follows:
  - cis  (alpha)-chlordane  (5103-71-9)  	   19%
  - trans  (gamma)-chlordane  (57-74-9)  	   24%
  - chlordene isomers  	   21%
  - heptachlor (76-44-8)   	   10%
  - nonachlor (3734-49-4)  	    7%
  - Diels-Adler adduct  (68441-65-6)  of  cyclopentadiene
       (542-92-7)  and pentachlorocyclopentadiene
       (25329-35-5)	    2%
  - hexachlorocyclopentadiene  (77-47-4)  ..........    1%
  - octochlorocyclopentadane  (287-92-3)  	    1%
  - (miscellaneous constituents)   	   15%
[AG-chlordane (HCS-3260, Velsicol)  is  an experimental  3:1
mixture  (95%) of  cis (a) and  trans  (Y)  chlordane  (95%
purity) employed  is  some toxicological  assays  (e.g., Arnold
et al.,  1977).]
                              A-2

-------
     Although a definitive genetic toxicology profile cannot
be established from the published literature reviewed here,
the following preliminary conclusions on the mutagenicity of
chlordane are warranted:                                    :^

     1.  Neither technical chlordane nor any of its constituents
         appear to be mutagenic in bacterial cells in adequately
         controlled assays.

     2.  Although negative in acceptable tests with less well
         established mammalian cell lines, technical chlordanel
         and/or one of its isomers have induced positive
         results in assays without activation (not tested
         with S9) in mammalian cell systems with established
         data bases.  Hence,  its potential to induce gene
         mutation in adequately controlled assays (i.e., with
         and without metabolic activation in the standard in
         vitro mammalian assays) still needs to be determine~d.

     3.  Similarly, adequate  germinal assays indicate this
         organochlorine does  not cause gross chromosome
         damage, but its potential for somatic cytogenetic  ?
         activity has not been evaluated.

     4.  The combined results of DNA repair assays indicate
         that chlordane (the  technical and/or one or more of
         its constituents) is genotoxic in yeast and fish, as
         well as in some types of mammalian cell systems.
                                                            -.= *.j> -.
     5.  There is also evidence suggesting that chlordane may
         act by epigenetic (e.g., promoter) mechanisms.
                             A-3

-------
                    MUTAGENICITY  OF  CHLORDANE
                                                        "y- -.'
THE DATA BASE                 ;  .        ]_    ,.,',,,,

     A total of' 25' published  articles  were  available, for review>  :
containing 34 assays  testing  technical' chlbrdane/itscoristitutent'
isomers as well as cpmmercial preparations  (TABLE 1).   One-third
were judged inadequate '(UNACCEPTABLE)  to support- the "negative    .
results reported, because  of  major  def icienei'es,  'and -another-   y.
one-third reporting positive  results were declared "liSTCOMCL'UStl.VE^ •
because of a combination of procedural/accouhting' inadelqua-cies.!--!
The remaining nine studies satisfy  the minimal 'data- requirements •
foirlall geaetic1 ^end-points.necessary  for regulatory purposes   ^
(geriV mutation, '-chromosomal 'damage, primary-DNA repair)', but -do
not provide a 'comprehensive'assessment of geriotoxTcpotential for
this, pesticide. *•  Further testing  is recommended/- in order to; ".••-•
confl'rm some 'suspect  positive results, as well as to provide ';; ;••••
support for assessments  in-other  areas -(-e.g. ,  evaluation -as-, a'•--
suspect carcinogen).

DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION  OF  ASSAY RESULTS    '   •  '\ "' "^ ' ; ^

   -..-?. A-  Survey-Studies      "••.'•'      '•    •    "•••.,,';,• .^•.'•'^'  : ' ''•'.'•'.'''•"*

          The published  results 'of studies conducted with '
chlordane that contained  little or no primary  data, ;although^y ;;•-
individually considered  technically inadequate"and  unacceptable
in'meeting regulatory requirements, ,can  be used •'; to  support  the ^' ;
overall conclusions  drawn  from the acceptable  studies  discussed- ^
below.         •-.,.-....         -           ,       	 -.  :_^^,- • ;

          As shown.in Table  1, chlordane was  evaluated in  three
modified Salmonella  tvphi'murium mammalian  microsome plate  incorpo-
ration Ames assays "(Wildeman and Nazar  1982;  Probst et dl.'1981;
Gentile et ai.  1982).  Wildeman and Nazar  (1982) reported  that a
commercial preparation providing 50 ug/plate  active ingredient.  •
did not induce  reversion  to  histidine prototrophy of  S. typhimurium
TA98 and TA100  either in  the absence  or the presence  of the	
following activation"systems:  rat S9,  S14 microsome  fractions'  -,
derived from corn or wheat,  or combine-d ;rat S9 and plant S14
fractions."  ,     _     ...          -..n-i.  ::..-.'•• '   •.< "- ;;•-..  ..-•  ,/ .,.-;.•',•!, •<	^.

          Qualitative negative results^ were also'-'feport'e'd by    •
both Probst  and associates (1981)  over a,.!-  to  10,000-fold non-
activated and  S9-activated concentration ,range, of .chlptdane  in
the Concentration agar gradient  test  with eight S., typhimurium
and'Vwo Escherichia  cbli  strains',  ahd by gentile et -al, (1982)
who, .reported  both co^rteTcial and  technical grade chlordane -(tested
at unreported  concentrations)  to  be  negative   in the"conventional
Ames test  using rat  S:9 and in an  Ames assay using  corn microsome
IS  fractions  for activation.
                                  A-4

-------
           Both  Ashwood-Smith and colleagues  (1972) and Ficsor
 (1972)  reported negative  results in  E. coli  reverse mutation
 nonactivated  spot  tests with chlordane,  the  former assayed a
 1 mg/disc  sample of  10% qhlordane and the latter tested sn
 unreported dose of 44.4%  chlordane,.

           A reverse  mutation assay using Zea mays at the waxy
 (wx)  locus as the  target  was also conducted  by Gentile and
 associates .(1982), but provided only qualitative evidence of a
 positive response  induced by chlordane in a  survey gene mutation
 study.  For this experiment/ 2.24 kg/hectare commercial grade
 chlordane  was sprayed on  mutant seeds in situ prior to emergence
 of corn seedlings.   Plants were allowed  to grow 12 to 14 weeks
 and pollen grains  were harvested, dehydrated* and stained.  The
 authors reported a significiant increase (p  < 0.05) in back-
 mutations  of wx~ to  wx+.  Because primary data were not reported,
 chlordane  is classified inconclusive but a presumptive positive
 mutagen in this  assay.                                        ;

           These  authors also included the results of a
 Saccharomyces cerevisiae  D4 mitotic  gene conversion assay.  Log-
 phase S_, cerevisiae  cells were exposed for 30 minutes to four
 doses of commercial  and technical grade  chlordane over a threefold
 to hundredfold  dilution range in the absence and presence of rat
 S9 and corn IS.  Commercial grade chlordane  was reported positive
 for unspecified  doses in  the presence of both rat  (S9) and corn
 (IS) microsome  fractions,  Technical grade chlordane was active
 only  in the presence of rat S9 activation.   Based on this quali-
 tative evidence, chlordane is considered presumptively genotoxic
 in yeast.                                                      L

           The ability of  0.1 mg/mL chlordane of unreported purity
 to interact with and damage DNA was  also evaluated in purified
 CoL El DNA from  J3. coli K12 by Griffin and Hill (1978), who
 reported the assay as negative.

           The findings presented in  these survey articles did not
 provide sufficient data to draw unequivocal  conclusions.  However,
 the data collectively provide qualitative evidence that chlordane
 is probably not  mutagenic in bacteria, but may be  presumptively
mutagenic  in plants.  The data also  provide  presumptive evidence
 that chlordane  causes mitotic gene conversion in yeast.

      B.   Primary Studies

           The following published results of genetic  toxicology
assays performed with chlordane contained sufficient  primary
data for review  and  evaluation according to  FIFRA  genetic points.
                               A--5

-------
          1.  Gene Mutation

              a.  Bacteria

                  Chlordane technical as well as trans (gamma)
chlordane were selected by the National Toxicology Program for
evaluation in the preincubation modification to the Ames test
using nonactivation and 10% rat or hamster S9 activation (Haworth
et al. 1986; Mortelmans et al. 1986).  For both preparations,
five nonactivated doses (0.1 to 10 u_g/plate) did not induce
histidine prototrophy in S_. typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA98, or
TA100; a slight cytotoxic effect was reported for strain TA1537
at 10 ug/plate.  In the presence of either hamster or rat S9
activation/ compound precipitation was reported at 3.3 and 10
mg/plate.  Similarly, neither preparation induced mutants in any
strain over the assayed dose range (10 to 1000 ug/plate with
strains TA1535 and TA1537 and 100 to 10,000 ug/plate with -strains
TA100 and TA98) in the presence of either of the two rodent
species' S9 microsomal fractions.  Based on the findings of this
study, both the technical as well as the trans-isomer were con-
sidered to be nonmutagenic.  The test material was adequately
investigated in these properly controlled assays, and these
studies are judged acceptable.

              b.  Mammalian Cells

                  Three assays evaluated the potential of chlordane
to induce gene mutation in mammalian cells  (Ahmed et al.  1977a;
Telang et al. 1982; Tong et al. 1981).  In  the preliminary dose
selection test Ahmed and associates  (1977a) found that nonactivated
>_ 100 uM chlordane was cytotoxic to Chinese hamster  lung  V79 cells.
Based on these results, nonactivated 10 uM  chlordane was  evaluated
in the mutagenicity assay.  The reported results showed  that at
cell survival of 44.4%, the selected dose  (30  replicate  cultures)
induced a fifteenfold increase in ouabain-resistant  mutants.

                  However, the study was incomplete  because
exogenous metabolic activation was not used.   These  data  are
needed to establish whether metabolism has  an  effect on  the  test
material's mutagenic potential.  Additionally,  the  study,results
are considered inconclusive because:

                  o  Only  a single dose of  an  unspecified
                     preparation of  chlordane  was  evaluated  for
                     mutagenicity.

                  o  The presumptive mutagenic response was  not
                     confirmed at  the  concentration range expected
                     to give  dose-response  data.
                                A-6

-------
                  o  Carbaryl and 2,4-D fluid, which have
                     previously been shown to be either weak
                     mutagens or nonmutagens, were reported to
                     give strong positive responses.

                  o  No positive control was included to ensure
                     an appropriate level of sensitivity.

Although assessed as inconclusive evidence for a positive response,
nonactivated chlordane may be classified as an unconfirmed
presumptive mutagen in Chinese hamster lung cells.

                  Telang and colleagues (1982) exposed 4 x 105
primary adult rat liver epithelial cells (ARL) to six concentra-
tions of technical chlordane (10~3 to 10~6 M) in two independent
experiments.  Chlordane was cytotoxic at 10~3 M, but 6-thioguanine-
resistant  (6-TGr) mutants were not induced at any dose.  Under
identical  conditions the positive controls, benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P)
or 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA), induced definitive
mutagenic  responses.

                  Negative results were also reported by the same
laboratory  (Tong et al. 1981) in human foreskin fibroblasts
(D-550) exposed to nonactivated chlordane at the maximum non-
cytotoxic  dose  (10~4 M).  When D-550 fibroblasts were also
cocultivated with hepatocyte primary cells (HPC), chlordane did
not increase the frequency of 6-TGr mutants in three separate
experiments.  By contrast, the concurrent positive control (DMBA)
induced a  significant  (p < 0.05) mutagenic response in the
presence of HPC.  Since chlordane was properly evaluated up to
cytotoxic  levels, the study is acceptable.

                  The National Toxicology Program (1985) reported
forward mutation at the TK locus of L5178Y mouse cells,  but only
in the absence of metabolic activation.

              c.  Conclusions for Gene Mutation

                  Based on the ir\ vitro results of  two inconclusive
mammalian gene mutation assays, chlordane is presumed  to be a
direct-acting mutagen for Chinese hamster lung cells and mouse
lymphoma cells.  However, the two acceptable studies submitted  in
the _in_ vitro mammalian cell gene mutation category  provide evidence
that chlordane was not mutagenic in liver epithelial cells or
human foreskin fibroblasts cocultivated with or without  HPC.
Hence, the relevance'of the direct positive responses  are  unclear
until tests are conducted to assay the possibility  that  chlordane
mutagenicity can be either enhanced or detoxified in the presence
of exogenous metabolic activity.
                               A-7

-------
          2.  Chromosomal Aberrations

              a.  Mammalian Studies

                  Technical chlordane and its major constituent
isomers have been evaluated in dominant lethal assays by two
laboratories (Arnold et al. 1977; Epstein et al.  1972).

                  Arnold et al. showed that single gavage or
ip administration of 50 and 100 mg/kg of the technical did not
elicit a dominant lethal effect in the offspring  of male mice
(eight/dose) sequentially mated (three females/mating) for
6 weeks.  The negative control groups consisted of eight males/
group/route of administration.  Measured parameters included
pregnancy rates, total implants, number of early deaths, and the
embryonic index.  The higher dose evaluated (100  mg/kg)  was
selected based on the results of an acute toxicity study which
indicated that 300 and 1000 mg/kg produced mild to severe toxic
effects.  The same investigators performed additional dominant
lethal assays in mice given 50 and 100 mg/kg AG-chlordane (3:1
mixture of alpha and gamma chlordane) orally (gavage) and ip.
Dose selection was based on the evidence of mortality/other toxic
signs at 300 and 1000 mg/kg by both routes of administration.
The dominant lethal assay was performed as described  for technical
chlordane; results indicated that the alpha and gamma chlordane
mixtures were negative.

                  Although the Arnold et al. data are discussed
here, they have not been considered for regulatory purposes
because these studies were conducted at IBT, and never validated.

                  Epstein and associates (1972) also  showed that
neither technical chlordane nor alpha or gamma chlordane induced
dominant lethal effects.  In one series of experiments,  seven and
nine male mice received 48 and 240 mg/kg chlordane,  respectively,
as single ip injections, and in a second experiment  10 males  were
administered 50 mg/kg/day by gavage for 5 consecutive days.   Four
males receiving 240 mg/kg and two animals in the 50  mg/kg gavage
group died.  All surviving males were sequentially mated (three
females/mating) for 8 weeks.  Females were  sacrificed 13 days
after mating and scored for pregnancy,  total  implants,  and  early
fetal deaths.  At the seventh mating  interval, early fetal  deaths
were recorded for 55 percent of  the females mated  to males  in the
50 mg/kg gavage group.  An analysis of  variance revealed no
significant effect (p < 0.05).   Based on the detailed criteria
developed by the authors to evaluate  assay  validity  and  positive
responses, chlordane was classified as  negative.   We assess that
the study is acceptable.

                  Epstein et al. also tested  for dominant  lethal
assays with the alpha isomer of  technical chlordane  ([1] 58 and
                                A-8

-------
  290 mg/kg, ip,  [2] 42 and 210 mg/kg ip, and  [3] 75 mg/kg/day by
  gavage for 5 days) and gamma chlordane (50 mg/kg/five daily
  gavage administrations).  These additional studies were also
  reported as negative, an assessment with which we concur that
  neither alpha or gamma chlordane induced a dominant lethal effect-
  the studies are acceptable.                                      '

                   In a single in vitro assay, trans-chlordane was
  reported negative for chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster
 ovary (CHO) cells tested up to levels of cytotoxicity (NTP 1985).

               t>•  Conclusions for Chromosomal Aberrations   "+ ^   ,

                   The results of dominant lethal assays conducted
 with chlordane, chlordane isomers, and mixtures of chlordane
 isomers  demonstrated that the test material is not clastogenic
 in male  mouse germinal cells.  Only one study investigating the
 potential  clastogenic effects of chlordane on somatic cells vwas
 located.   The reported negative result in vitro reguires confirma-
 tion in  an adequately conducted in vivo assay.              r".' ,

           3.   DNA Repair                                     ''

               The results of a variety of DNA repair assays , •
 conducted  with  chlordane preparations are variable, but appear
 to be  generally consistent for the specific type of assay.  .Thus,
 although considered  inconclusive,  -both assays for gene conversion
 in Saccharomyces  cerevisiae  strain D4 recorded presumptively
 positive results  (Gentile et al.  1982; Chambers and Dutta 1976)..,

              Maslansky  and  Williams (1981) assayed 10"1 to Tt)~6 M
 chlordane  for unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) in rat, mouse, and
 hamster primary  hepatocytes.   Three separate experiments wer§ .
 conducted  with  each,hepatocyte species and 30 morphologically;
 normal cells/experiment/species  were counted for nuclear grains.
 at  the highest  noncytotoxic  dose  only.  Chlordane at _> 10-4"'M:was
 cytotoxic  for all  cell systems;  no significant increase in net
 nuclear grain counts  was  seen at  10~5 M.   The positive control,
 DMBA, gave an appropriate response thereby demonstrating the':
 sensitivity of  the test  system to  detect  UDS in rat, mouse, /ind
 hamster hepatocytes.  The study  is considered acceptable and."..
 showed that chlordane assayed up  to a cytotoxic level was notf"
 genotoxic  in hepatocytes  of  three  rodent  species.

              Probst  and  associates (1981)  also reported a negative
UDS response in rat hepatocytes.   No significant increase in"net
nuclear grain counts  was  seen in  20 morphologically normal""
hepatocytes per dose  group exposed for 5  and 18 to 20 hoursto
the maximum noncytotoxic  dose of  chlordane (100 nmol/mL).  T'he
study appears as have been properly controlled and is acceptable.
                               A-9

-------
              Brandt  et al.  (1972) reported that treatment  of
nonirradiated and UV-irradiated HeLa cells with 0.04 mM alP^-
Shlirdane did not cause UDS  or inhibition of DNA repair.  Although
reported as negative, the  study provided no meaningful data.  The
sensitivity of this assay  is questionable because the positive
controls (methyl methanesulfonate and ethyl methanesulfonate)
were only marginally  active  in inducing UDS, and showed no
Interference with repair  replication of the UV-challenged cells.
The study is therefore unacceptable.

              By contrast to the  negative finding in primary rat
mouse, and hamster hepatocytes, the UDS assay conduct^dq^h^V"^h
transformed human fibroblasts  (VA-4) by Ahmed et al.   1977b) with
nonactivated and rat  S9-activated doses of  chlordane  (1, 10, luu,
and 1000 uM) reported a significant increase in UDS over the
control  (? < o!o5) at all doses.   It should be  noted  that^hydroxy-
Srw treatment was used to block  cell  entry into scheduled
 "       DNA synthesis.   Although  quantitative data  were not


          s: s^s-s^s  <°v     :V        ' HE
                                                -'°
were seen.

              To further define the type of repair mechanism
elicited by chlordane, these investigators performed a BUdR




         ly long  (UV-type) excision repair mechanisms.  The

 regions  are  saturated  at  relatively  low

               However,  the  lack  of primary  data  for the majority





 suspect  for  the following reasons:

               n  SV-40, VA-4 is  a virus  transformed cell  line;
                  and it has been recommended by a panel  of  expertSl



 1 Mitchell,  A>U.; Casciano^D.A.^ltz^M.L.; Robinson, ^^^


   San, R'^"g[sW^gts?Sa report of the U.S. Environmental Protection

   Agenc^Gene-Tox Program.  Mutat Res 123:363-410.


                               A-10

-------
                  that only nontransformed diploid human cells
                  should be used in this assay.

               o  The cells were not grown under reduced serum or
                  arginine deprivation conditions in conjunction
                  with hydroxyurea treatment to completely preclude
                  entry of the cells into (S-phase) DNA synthesis,
                  thus increasing the possibility of a false
                  positive result.

               o  The results were not confirmed.

               o  The publication did not indicate that the slides
                  were coded to eliminate bias.

               o  Several agents which have been repeatedly shown
                  to be nongenotoxic or weakly genotoxic (i.e.,
                  diquat, 2-4-D fluid, and carbaryl) induced
                  strong UDS responses.              .

               Based on the above rationale we consider this study
 as inconclusive but classify chlordane as a presumptive but uncon-
 firmed genotoxin for SV-40 transformed human cells.  We recommend
 that these findings be confirmed in a rigorously controlled
 experiment that conforms to the currently accepted protocols for
 UDS assays with human cell lines.

               Sobti et al. (1983)  exposed human lymphoid LAZ-007
 cells  to  nonactivated and  rat S9-activated 10~4 to 10~6 M chlordane
 for 48: hours  and 1  hour,  respectively.  Although statistically
 significant  increases (p  < 0.01)  in the  incidence of sister
 chromatid exchanges (SCE)  were reported  at 10~5 -S9 and at 10~5
 and 10-o  M +S9f  tne elevated  SCE frequencies were neither dose-
 related nor  twofold at  any level.   It should be mentioned that
 experts recommend2  that  for  a compound to be considered positive
 in  the  SCE assay  it should either  cause  at  least a twofold increase
 over baseline  SCE frequencies or demonstrate a three-point, dose-
 response  curve showing a progressive  increase  over baseline SCE
 frequencies with at least  one SCE  value  at  p < 0.001 level.
 Although  the authors  concluded that chlordane  was genotoxic, the
 study  is  considered inconclusive and  should  be repeated.

              Vigfusson and associates (1983)  described the
111 vivo exposure of 15 central mudminows  (Umbra limi)/dose in
   Latt, S.A.; Allen, J.; Bloom, S.E.; Carrano,  A.;  Falke,  E;
   Kram, D.; Schneider, E.; Schreck,  R.;  Tice,  R.; Whitfield,
   B; Wolff, S.  (1981)  Sister-Chromatid  Exchanges:   A Report
   of the Gene-Tox Program, Mutat. Res.  87:17-62.
                              A-ll

-------
5 gallon well aerated aquaria (5 fish/aquaria)  to four  doses  of,
chlordane (5.4 x 10~9 to 5.4 x 1Q-2 M)  for 11 days.   The  positive
lindinSS of this in vivo study provided evidence of, a dose-related
and highly signiflc-anTTp < 0.01) increase in the frequency of
SCE in metaphases harvested from intestinal tissue.   At the
highest doll , four fish survived treatment and the SCE  frequency/
cell (19.3 + 0.51) was approximately 4.3-fold higher than the
control.  Similarly, 3.8- and 1.7-fold increases were reported  ..
at 5.4 x 10-10 and 5.4 x lO"11 M, respectively; the lowest
concentration assayed was negative.  The sensitivity of^he
assay was demonstrated by the significant (p < 0.01) increase in
SCE frequency/cell induced by 5.4 x 10~9 M Mitomycin C.  We      ;
assessed, therefore, that chlordane is genotoxic in Umbra limi >. ..
and the study is acceptable.

              Finally, the NTP  (1985) reported trans-chlordahe
induced sister chromatid exchanges  in CHO cells  cultured  in
vitro, but only  in the absence  of metabolic  activation.   This, is
fUFther supporting evidence  for a direct  DNA-damaging  effect of
the trlns-ilomer  in mammalian cells, and  indicates  the necessity
to evaluate  this  potential  in adequately  controlled  mammalian
test systems which  include mammalian activation.                ,s

          a.  Conclusions  for DNA  Repair

              The results  of UDS assays  appear to indicate that
chlordane  is  not genotoxic in primary  mouse, rat,  or hamster   .
liver  cells.  However,  nonactivated chlordane was reported to
induce a  positive genotoxic response in  SV-40 transformed human
fibroblasts  but ^was  negative in the presence of S9 activation.
The authors  indicated  that direct-acting chlordane appeared  to

                                                                •

 adequate controls.

               Elevations in SCE frequency were observed in human
 lymphoid cells .following exposure to both ^-activated and non-
 activated doses, however, the response did not satisfy
 acceded criteria for a positive effect  in this system.

               The single in vivo DNA repair  study  reported' that
 chlordane induced SCE in IHteTtinal cells of fish  and  that the
 response was dose related.

               Based on  the results of  DNA repair  assays we
 conclude that chlordane  is not  genotoxic in  rodent liver  cells
                                A-12

-------
or human iymphoid cells, but is genotoxic in fish.   The  presumptive
direct-acting genotoxic effect on transformed human f ibrojiblasts
is unconfirmed.                                          ;

          4.  Epigenetic Effects

              Telang et al. (1982) evaluated six doses of technical
chlordane (10"4 to 10"7 M) for the potential to inhibit  inter-
cellular communication between TGr mutants of ARL (HGPRT")  and
ARL (HGPRT)+ cells.  Chlordane was cytotoxic at 10~4 M for ARL
(HGPRT-) cells.  In the presence of HGPRT+ cells, 5 x 1Q^6 through
1 x. 10"' M, chlordane markedly inhibited the metabolic cooperation
between the HGPRT- -deficient and -competent cells.  At  5 x 10~6 M
an almost complete blockage of phosphoribosylated TQ. transfer
between the cells was observed as indicated by the.* > 100 and 86
percent recovery of TGr mutants cocultivated with 0?75 and
1.25 x 106 HGPRT+ cells.  Increased survival was alsp reported at
10~5 and 10~6 M chlordane.  The specificity of the assay to detect
only agents which interfere with cell-to-cell communication
(epigenetic) in contrast to chemicals which induce genQtoxicity
was 'demonstrated with the lyphophilic procarcinogen/promutagen,
B[a]P.  Four doses of B[a]P, up to a cytotoxic level,, did hot
increase the recovery of TGr colonies.

              To support the conclusion  that chlordane  interferes
with intracellular communication, the investigators  evaluated
the effects of chlordane on guanine metabolism of  treated ARL
cells.  At/the cytotoxic level and at those concentrations that
profoundly affected cell-to-cell  communication  in  the primary
assay.(10"4 to 10~6 M), chlordane did not  cause  ah appreciable
reduction of [14C] guanine conversion to its principal  metabolites.
Although a positive control which is known to  inhibit cell-to^cell
communication, such as  DDT, was not  included  in  this experiment,
we assess that the findings provide  evidence  that  chlordane
interferes with metabolic  cooperation suggesting^ that chlordane
may act as a promoter.                           ;

               Further suggestive  evidence  for  a  promoter effect  is
provided by the study of Brubaker and colleagues (1970), who
assessed that  trans-chlordane  was positive for cell  division
inhibition but negative for  inhibition  of  DNA synthesis in mouse
iymphoma (L5178Y) cells.                         ;  /'

OVERALL INTERPRETATION  OF  STUDY  RESULTS                    '.;

     The individual published  studies were insufficient to
establish a complete  genetic  toxicology profile for chlordane.
When considered collectively,  however,  some preliminary assess-
ments can be made.
                                A-13

-------
      The  single bacterial gene mutation assay with primary data
  and  the survey studies with procaryotes show that chlordane is
  not  mutagenic in bacteria.  The positive reverse mutation assay
  using  Zea mays- provided qualitative evidence of a mutagenic  -
  response  induced by chlordane in a plant system.  Although the
  study  reported no primary data, chlordane is classified as
  presumptively mutagenic.

      Mammalian cell gene mutation assays with chlordane showed">
  that the test material was not genotoxic in ARL cells or human
  fibroblasts.  Although nonactivated chlordane induced an incon-
  clusive, mutagenic response in Chinese hamster V79 cells, the
  validity of this assay was seriously compromised because of
  technical deficiencies, the reporting of positive responses with
  compounds that are either weakly mutagenic or not mutagenic, and!
  the lack of a positive control.  Although we classified chlordane
 as an unconfirmed presumptive positive mutagen for Chinese hamster
 V79 cells, we have serious reservations about the validity of the
 study,  and recommend that these results be verified in a complete ;
 assay (i.e., three or more noncytoxic doses, with and without
 metabolic activation and with known mutagenic positive controls).

      Although chlordane proved to be nonclastogenic in dominant
 lethal  assays in  male mouse germinal cells,  confirmation of its
 potential  clastogenicity in somatic cells is needed.

      The results  of  survey studies indicate  that chlordane in the
 presence of  rat and  plant microsomes is presumptively recombinogenic
 in yeast.   Data from studies with sufficient primary  data to draw
 meaningful conclusions,  however.,  indicate that chlordane is not
 genotoxic  in primary mouse,  rat,  or hamster  hepatocytes.  Although
 elevations in the  SCE frequency were seen in human lymphoid
 cells,  the increases were not considered indicative of a genotoxic
 response.  On the  other  hand,  chlordane was  reported  to induce
 SCE in  central mudminnows,  and in CHO cells  without activation.

      There was a statistically significant increase in UDS reported
 in  SV-40 transformed human  fibroblasts exposed to nonactivated
 doses of chlordane;  however,  the  effect was  eliminated in the
 presence of  rat S9 activation.   The validity of this  assay was
 seriously  compromised  by  numerous technical  deficiencies, strong
 positive responses by  weakly  genotoxic or nongenotoxic substances,
 the lack of  positive  controls,  and the use of a transformed cell
 line.  The UDS assay  should  be  repeated with a nontransformed
 cell  line.

      In preliminary  results  with  a novel assay, Telang et al.
 (1982) reported that  chlordane  interferes with cellular communi-
cation.   As  enunciated by  these  authors,  the mechanism by
which chlordane inhibits  such  metabolic cooperation may involve
 intercellular communication mediated  by gap  junctions and thus,
 interference with this process  could  be produced by a variety of

                                A-14

-------
effects on the cell membrane.  Since organochlorine pestic-ides
are lipophilic in nature, they consequently tend- to accumulate in
the lipid layer of the cell membrane, thereby altering membrane
functions.  Therefore, these authors suggest that accumulation of
organochlorine pesticides in the cell membrane could directly
interfere with the function of gap junctions.  •

     The combined results of gene mutation assays indicate that
chloirdane is not mutagenic in bacteria.  On the other hand,
presumptive (unconfirmed) positive results have^been reported
in V79 and L5178Y cells with and without activation^ as well as
in plant assays.  DNA repair assays indicate chlordane appears
to be not genotoxic in bacteria, rodent hepatocytes and human
lymphoid cells, but is an unconfirmed presumptive genotoxin in
yeast and transformed human fibroblasts.

     Based upon the lack of a definitive genotoxic effect, the
positive results in the metabolic cooperation assay, and the
evidence that chlordane has properties similar to known promoters,
chlordane may act by promotional (epigenetic) mechanisms.  We
recommend, however, that this indication of.promoter activity be
corroborated in additional studies.

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

     The following assays are needed to complete the genetic
toxicology requirements for chlordane:

  ,   o  Gene mutation assays in mammalian cell systems with and
       .without metabolic activation in accordance with acceptable
  .      procedures.

     o  In vivo mammalian assays for chromosome aberrations in
        somatic cells (e.g., rodent bone marrow).

     o  in vitro assays for SCE  (with and without activation)  in
        mammalian cell systems.

RECOMMENDATIONS

     The following tests are recommended to  investigate  the
potential promptional activity of  the test material,  according  to
recognized procedures :•*

     0  lH vitro transformation  with promotion assay.

     o  In vivo promoting activity assay.
   Weisburger, J.H.; Williams, G.M.   (1984)   Bioassay of  carcinogens
   In vitro and in vivo  in Chemical Carcinogens,  Vol.  2,  Univ.  o£
  'iTrmingham, UK, Am. Chem. Soc. Monograph  182,  pp.  1323-1373.

                                A-15

-------
               lu  E  C  >,
                O  B  O rH
                      4J  O —
               •O
                            §
                      (8  C «-
                      CU-H <
                      0)  (0 E-
                      »J  U
                      Q, JJ   .
                >> a,'*
               rH  (A  IB  O
                          to co
                      O 4J —
O  (A
                                           8,
                                       CO  O
        w
                IS rH
                B XI
                                       S.-S
                                                                                O  rH
                                                                                                           o .o
     •O
     O  9
     a  CQ
     « K
                >  IS  iH
                0)  C  O
               JE  SO
                                       S1
                                               9 o
                                                  •rJ
                                               (A X
                                           rH  C O  fl)
                                        0) r-l  O -U rH
                                        >  1C  -r> O J3
                                                                                                                 9  O
                                                                                      *> 4J  9  M
                                                                                                           >  «
                                                                                                                 C  O  4>
                                                                                                                 O JJ    'O
                                                                                wo  e
                                                      O  HI
                                                      U)  >
                                                                                   c  o  o  e  41
                                                                               Z  9  O
                                                                   en
                                                                   QJ
    4J  4J.9  W

 o>  *o  o;  o  01
Q  C      CO  >
 C  O  O  C  0)
 9  O  4J  9  rH
                e -^
                0> CM
               •O CO
                                                                                                          JE  4>
i ^- o  ra
         •-
  at  o
  W  C  Cfl
  O  O  9
  Q  O —
                  O
                                            i  W
                                          O  nj
                      4J 43
   S
                                                                                   CTl
                                           08
                                             •   «  '
                                           O  O  • —
                                           «-  r- 4J  >J
                                                   re  ai
                                            O  O  M 4J
                                                                                    • O'W
                                                                                   O «- +
                                                                   m

                                                                   V
                                                                                                               • ^ 4J.—.
                                                                                                             T-  O
                                                                                                                      •$
4J o  en  e
   o  w  «
f r-  + iC.
     P. 4J
                U>  9
                *>    4 W*
               4J  C0| I


                (B  C <
               CD  -H —
     01  0)
               C  -P
                                                         A-16

-------
0
o

























est Materials:
f













o

rs
0 9
^
H
„

fM
0> 01
JJ JJ
iJ i-l
a. S
•01
4) 01
«. a



c

ic
j;
C




ose (mg/kg) or
oncentration
ug, ppm) Range)
QCJ —



0> 0
&tl
E" 5
•O 4J
38
W E-«



u £
3 &
0) 4
C 4
$8


1
8
o
b
o,
Jj
c
•I-l

*
^1
X
•^f
a>
r-l

1

0 hi
P 0>
3 &
,4 —. >O
5 o.S
U 4) JJ lu
•* TJ 4) -i
iw U
U-i r-4 » ,4> •
9 IB >, 04 C
01 |J JJ 01 O
C 3 —I C •-<
H TJ U 3 JJ
1
"j
O
c
o
o
H





m
^
Positi


r-4
1C.
JJ
0)
. c
o
1-1
CO

,
specified] : 20
•— *

.2
'01
u
f-4
IS
.2
^
CO


01

s



4)
01

o
O
^
t^i

C
•I-l
I-l
§







p

—


to
o
o

E
•3
•H
l-l
•i-l
51




























(0
rr*
fl
0>
•c
jj
a.1
•H


"O
0)
H
H
U
a .
S'S
3 -M
0 JJ
•-) C rs
u-i rs is
UJ IS
9 x a
01 JJ 4)
C .rf S
n s a
i
g
r-t
o
c
0
u
M


c


41
>
Positi

IS

IS
c
is
EI
c

•H
to


specified] :
s
*»•




JJ —
0) "O
4) -
t< JJ



O>
01

00
••J <
3 E-<

i' C,
.^1
O f-»
2.g







r>
^.
*^*

O
8
0 P*
§-
in 0
So
O
P P
T- IN

01




S..J
UJ .
V
•d
jj
1
Insuff ic
9

g
8
M


C
•H

O>

JJ
1
ITS*
O
00
en


6
IS
1

E.

s
in
1
14-1
•H
O
£
U)
£





,4
u
0>
&4 '
in c
e o
with an
preparat



1
'01


i
IS
tjl
4> 00
C C^
«f
- E-
0
o o>












5
's
•-4 O
o 2
o •
P 00
2?





•mo
tol 4) O
c
•l-l
o

jj
3
9
E
E ^-"
•^
7
4J
§
U
















0)
2
u
01 >
to ,-'•
1
JJ.
&4

1 v .'»
IS rH
C £
D IB





4)'
. >
•H
JJ
IS
.. 4>
• z-


i— >
' "8
JJ
0> '

£> 00
O CA

0. ~

B
specified]; 1
000 (gradient),
rat S9
E2*> •
u
s
o
£
•I-l
a
c
01
01
Vl
u
Survey s
:'. <
a
8
o
IB
C
D





0>
>
• ••. JJ
IS
0)
•-«

jr
jj
. *i-4
W
1

1
' 01

0"
•^
hnical: 1000/d
8
E-
.2

, 01
I • •
r-4 r-4
IS O
t v
4) «
JJ ' W 1
o •
10 C









a'
01
c
c
0
activati
tests.



o>
IS










CM
e>>
v
^•'

IS
JJ
*



?
JJ
9
,- O1
•§
"a1
, c-
0>
- 4)
' 14
O
Survey. s
i
jj
Ct4
a>
. o
u
IS
e
D




JJ
a
01 ;
.5. '.
o
activati
tests.



1 '
IS

jj
IS
;|. .


CM
u
T—
^^

O
8
•i-t
fa
o
r-4.
imercial (Ortho-
B
o























IS
U4 O
o to
«• Qi
*r 4)
«- 14
04
i3
2 2
Ci 4)
CO E
^r o
r- o









JZ
JJ
's
01
3
01
o
Summary
i
3
r-4
O
c
o
u
H


O
U^

j.1
>
Positi
s
r-4
IS
JJ
41
0>

•H
JJ
C
4)
O
^
S
•a1
IN
•
CN
FH
IS
•H
U
VJ
O
O

C
•l-l
o
•f4
JJ
IS
JJ
E
C
iH
Cu





1
JJ
kj
a
4)
V
CU
r-l
IB
O







a commer
1 tion.
1



0)
0!

in
c
•r4
IS
kl
o>

4'
rH
O
Oi







CM
03
Cfl
^
*"*


3
•H
01
.51
•o
41
Oi
01
IB
X
^

i
rs
4)
N
C
0
u











X
*
D^
C
H
c
contai



























A-17

-------
          •a  c
                                                                      •o   c
           O (8
                                                                       01 -P
           C O
           o  a;
                                                  O XI
                                                                       O  0)
•a
s.«
M  i
s,
o»
c:
           IB  C  (U
 >     -c
•rl  C!
X)  i-!  O
•.-<  O* ••->
 01  C  X
 O  ••-)  O
fb  0) 4J
«  O  Q)
                                4J  -O
•U  >. W
(SOU)

O>     M
0)  O  O
2  -P  -O
                                          4J  O
                                          •H x:
                                                                                        O  Cn  «J
•H  X      Oi ^
-p  o   
a)  o   o o  i   c
Z  C  -O T- ID  -H
            E cn
                             rfl oo
                                                  en oo
                                                                                            -O  —
                                                                                            r-l  !-
                                                                                             O  P-
 O  (0
                                                                                                       O  OS
                                                                                                (D     T-
                6  *
                                                      S  q
                                                          a
                                                      O  0)
                                                                                                _   •  "O
                                                                                                o  a,  n
                                                                                                T- -,J   O
                                                                                                               04
                                                                                                O r-l
                                                                                                O  18
                                                                                             -
                                                                                            o
                                                                                                o  C
 0)  0)
            o •-' >
                                 O CO
                                    «
                                    <
                                 3 ~—
                                                  t-t  -r1 IT)
                                                                            O  03

                                 o  c
                                                       o  clo
                                           ro  o  c
                                           S 
                                                                                                XI
                                                                                             U  < -P  O
                                                         A-18

-------
I
u
O
Z
H
EH
CO

13
U







































| Test Materials:






















4-1
C
(
E
E
C

C
C
1
10
m 3
EH rt
10
w


•D
a) to
•P 4-1
>-• l-H
O 3
a co
01 (1
K fH


§
•r
4-
It
•t
c.





Dose (mg/kg) or
Concentration
I (ug, ppm) Range)



0) .(1)
^ w
•0* 4->
3 CO
4J gi
tO EH

^
O r<
•r-l O
4J tP
(!) 0)
C 4J
4> IB
O U

















JJ
a
a.
o
0
**

a
3

(!)
,,j
4J
(B
o-
0)
2
*
r J
J lJ CO C
0 10 •--•
O u-' Qi C 4J
.,-1 Q) •«-! 10
X 0! U E
O i-1 Qi 10
4-> C! C X
> •-• o a>
o a> r-t -H a)
4J i-H IB 4-> g:






cs
r^
r



O 0) O O (1)
^* tr* c^ *— Q) CP
CM IB CM (N Cn 10
> m .. >
•OlB ••(T3»O> r4lB
Ct7» MCCld 0)C7»
IB 0) IB IB CT> E
E o »
COO OCOfN •• COO
^J1 in to in ^ m -H in
•H t^ 1
XX 1 X X — X
Qi — Oi Qi X 10
«- i-i m IB T- -H T- -H E in
J3 in to E
& 2 IB
*— CM M»<«— (N ro OSCD*—



•a
-U
c
o
a
IB
(1)
r-l
•a
1 4-^
10 ^^ 01 C
IJ to CTi O
M C 10 U
m O E —
XI -H IB
< 4J Q

















4J
Q.
a) a)
U r-J
0 XI


IX
EH
•z.



Trans-Ch lordane :
(?) +_S-9

*~*

c in u
•rJ r-l ~\
r-< 0
to C) EC
O O U
•>-J — •
4-> C
(!) IB O
C 'f-J iM
0) r-l 4->
C7> IB *H
U E -r-l




- 10 C 4J 3 •rJ r-l 4-> 10 10 3 • B" to « 4-' <1) UJ r-- tO 030 to T3 >i (1) iW >-: -C IB (!) 3 --J O CO 4J Oj ^ O C O 0) u > C -rJ r-i K £ 4-) S C > 4-i 4J > 01 JJ r-l O O C QJ 10 O r—i 10 4-1 Q) 0) r-1 — * ••H -H C > O 0) O V4 HI 0) o C 0) • tr> co| 4-1 ra c IB O — !" to Q 0) Ui e 10 Lt D -H < Qi 2 ai Q a; r-l C O i-J IB )-; 3 IB "O E .4! E U 3 O CO ^ Oi 4J O 4-i cr 10 3 r-J ij O -H 4J X! IB CO 4J 4J XI -H 01 rt IS t3 3 r-l O c o a> 0 > C -r-l M 01 C' *^ 4J •H CO O ft 10 4J 4J 3 O CO 0) — • E t- 10 Cn x; T- O " [Unspecified] : "0.7.5%" tu o IB >i 0) C > • •rH VJ (!) 3 >-i e co 3 CO TD o tn a> T3 C O •H O (!) C ij Cn 0) C >j 3 •rJ O 01 co co c ^ a a' o O 0) 10 r-l C X! O 10 0) ^ 4J 10 Cn 01 2 r-l •r-l V- C 0) -~ X -H t/1 10 E 0 (1) to X! JJ (8 XI iH (N ? *i IB W Vi -H 4J r-l rH M3 8 IB • Q -rH W . A-19


-------






















XI
c
ai

o
u
§

TB
Evaluati
XI X
U i-
O4 V
K Q










«»
Test Materials











e
c
•r
•P
(t
4.
c



^^
M 0)
Dose (mg/kg) o
Concentration
(uq. ppm) Rang
o
Oi
!'
V)


u
•r4
XI
0)
c
0)
u


1


XI
cv
O r-<
U X)
< 10
Negative up
to cytotoxic
doses
•O CO
m

jt
in
c
R)
to
s




[Unspecified]:
Unscheduled DNA
en
•-*
(0
§
•H
r-4
S

XI
m
M
S3 XI
° i
s*
O
- in
l!
synthesis (UDS) in
primary hepatocytes
i n vi 1-ro f hena to-


1


XI
Oj
a> a)
O •-!
0 XI
< id
Negative up
to cytotoxLc
dosos

,-j
XI
CO
XI
to
1
£




[Unspecified] :
cytes from rat,
mouse, hamster)




^^
CO
^



tJ
1
c
o —
O >i
r- I-l
c
s °
XI
in to
o »•»

•o
a>
to
a> r
,u



>t
-j
T< jrt
a> c to
tn o tn
O -H Id
t3 J
a
tn a>
ai a> >
§ g-i
>* id to

O •
i
XI
Qj
Unaccel

C CO
r4 10


%
a
id
Negative

i-t
id
XI
0)
XI
•O
C
(d
^j
ffi
0)
c
id
•O
W
id
|
id
tn
0
Inhibition of re-




,^
e'-
en
— '
o
o
CO
*-^
E e
^
•* in
O O">
o a)
pair (CsCl density
gradient assay) in
mammalian cells
(HeLa)

3
i-t
Inconc
Positive only

,-4
id
x>

1
^
O

"•
^~
[Unspecified] :
UDS in transformed


p4
to
without acti-
vation (+S9,
no effect)
for long-
patch repair




J3
tn
*"•"'



^
o
0
o
*~ co
T3
C XI
id id
14
0 1
0 \
(SV-40) human
fibroblasts (VA-4)



0)
x>



M
id ,
id rd C
iH O
a> e ••-!
u •
-1 •*-" *
1 Ui U/
a> tu a> c
to tn > -i-i
o c c .-i
13 O O
Oi U >-l
• c
J? u •— 1
o a> o a>
"Z, M C O
1
3
»— 1
Inconc


a)
>
r4
to
Positive at
noncyto toxic
doses ( 1 0~5 ,
10~6 M)

H3

4J
CO

x>
o
co




Trans -Chlordane :
Sister-chromatid




•-•
CO
en





s'l
.D
o cn
>- co
S2
U
exchange (SCE)
in vitro (human
lymphoid cells,
LAZ-007 )


i
4J
Qi
CO
0
s


CO
-1
Q
id



Positive,
dose-related
increase
1-1
4J
a>
c
o
tn
to
^




*•*•*





iw co
en en
•H t-
>
I
o
^~
kj

Technical: 5.4
i
to
c
•H
1
C
bi

M
o
•r4 .
S IJ
N 3
7 id
o
.- c
X '
tn
• * .u
in 73 a)
4-1
o •- id
4-1 r- S
tinal cells of ex-
posed central mud-
minnows , Umbra






•H
•H
H
o> ^ '


«
a

rt
z
a
ns

14 XI

(0 O
D, c;
B —

















































A-20

-------
CJ
HI
EH
CO
O
H



















































en
.H
(8
•rl
M
IV

18


4J
tn
(V
EH




































j_>
C
IV
E
I
0
CJ

e
o
•rl
4->
18
CD 3
EH i-H.
18

W



•C

•rl
O



0 6
c c
^-« , o TC
a\.ri ctf
A; 4J
••«. * •—
0-> jj E

•Sec

IV O «
01 C Oi
O O 3
Q CJ —





^ e
IV (V
O< J-i
>t 01

H3 4J
3 tn
4-> 0)
W >EH




>
CJ IH
•H O
4-> 01
 4-)
O O
ES 18
1
3
i— (
U
C
O 0)
o t>
C -rl
H CO




CT*
W

t> 4J
3 S
•rH .C
tn 4J
o -r<
Cu 3

. — .
tn
CO
Cn

s--

ft.
55

.»
(U
C
18
•a

o
rH
X
. u cn
1 CO
01 1
c
(8 ^"*

EH —
„
O
CJ


o

4->
.pj
c

CJ
CO
(V
tr* *— •
, 18 -O
E

Q -H C
18 O
rtl Qi CJ
53 IV ^-*
Q C£






















4J
a.

u
o
<


LI
o


a.1

jj
•rH
tn
O
*
*- 1

J-l
O

Cn
e
18
i-H
IV
EH







• •
rH
(8
O
•H
e
_r*
u
01
EH
1
18
0)
Oi
0
O
O

O
i-J
O
Xi
0
E





!_•
01

,^3
o

























O rJ 1C
-rJ I-" O
4J (P -rH
•rJ CJ C
X! I-' 3
«-i a; E

ceo
•-J -rJ CJ





,-*
OJ
CO
cn
*_"
o
4J

S W
CU
**• i>j
t 3
0 -P
r- rH
3
o o
4_)
'O
*  — CU
I-H It C3
a) o o x
0 «H V4 ^

c i 5 fe 3
O E CU rH
•rl O C C3 41
4-> O -rl B3 O
tn
E
tn
•i*j
c
18

O
U

•a
4J
tn
a)
4J

(V
K
o
•0

(V
c
o

^
i-H
e
o




rt

z




Iu
O


tv

• rJ
4->
•rH
tn
S
i
IV

.U'
0)

(0
pQ
2
CQ

••
IV
e
ns
*s

o
i-H
_<-;
CJ
1
tn
e
18

EH




U--
O

C
o
•iH
4-1
• rj
XI
•rH
•S
M











e
0

4J
18

• r-l
4J
O
(S

4J
3
O
X
4->
•rl
s :










u-i c " cn ' . . . ,
O O • >J 1-1
•r4 ^ O W .
C 01 4J U-I (V
O -rl 0) X
•^ > CD a1 4J
4J -r- b t> C
•rJ T3 >J -H1 tK,
XI 18 J-> in - •
•iH rH (8 ••''.'
X i*H C*J O^' t£
C IV C3 CU Z
•rH O — • 13 O





r^ ^
o
r*.
m . . . . •
*^ * ! • ?•





G\ ' ' .•''••
co ; •-•'"'.


>.
j '. . .
E

Oi,
3 1

•* . . .

^^.
tn co
C rJ r-
•rJ l-H ^«
IV I/)
C CJ J . .
o »-
•H e . • •
JJ 18 O
18 -H VJ
O rH *J
•rl 18 -rl . .
rH E > '?'
& 18 C
>J E -rl










                                              A-21

-------
                       CHLORDANE REFERENCES

 Ahmed,  F.E.;  Lewis, N.J.; Hart, R.W.  (1977a)  Pesticide induced
     ouabain  resistant mutants in Chinese hamster V79 cells.
     Chem.-Biol.  Interactions 19:369-374.

 Ahmed,  F.E.;  Hart, R.W.; Lewis, N.J.  (1977b)  Pesticide induced
     DNA damage  and its repair in cultured human cells.  Mutation
     Res.  42:161-174.

 Arnold,  D.W.; Kennedy, G.L.; Keplinger, M.L.; Calandra, J.C.;
     Calo,  C.J.   (1977)  Dominant lethal studies with technical
     chlordane, HCS-3260, and heptachlor:  heptachlor epoxide.
     J.  Toxicol.  Environ. Hlth. 2:547-555.

 Ashwood-Smith, M.J.; Trevino, J.; Ring, R.   (1972)  Mutagenicity
     of  dichlorvos.  Nature  240:418-420.

 Brandt, W.N.; Flamm, W.G.;  Bernheim, N.J.  (1972)  The value of
     hydroxyurea  in assessing repair synthesis of DNA in HeLa
     cells.  Chem.-Biol Interactions 5:327-339.

 Brubaker,  P.E.;  Flamm, W.G.; Bernheim, N.J.   (1970)  Effect of V
     (gamma)-chlordane on synchronized lymphoma cells and inhibition
     of  cell division.  Nature 226:548-549.

 Chambers,  C.; Dutta, S.K.   (1976)  Mutagenic  tests of chlordane
     on  different microbial  tester strains.   (Abstract).  Genetics
     83:sl3.

 Epstein, S.S.; Arnold, E.;  Andrea, J.; Bass, W. ; Bishop, Y.
     (1972)  Detection of chemical mutagens by the dominant lethal
     assay  in  the mouse.  Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 23:288-325.

 Ficsor, G.; Nu LoPiccolo, G.M.  (1972)  Survey of pesticides for
     mutagenicity by the bacterial-plate assay method.  Environ.
     Mutagen Soc. Newsl. 6:6-8.

Gentile, J.M.; Gentile, G.J.; Bultman, J.; Sechriest, R.; Wagner,
     E.D.;  Plewa, M.J.  (1982)  An evaluation of  the  genotoxic
     properties of insecticides following plant and animal
     activation.  Mutation Res. 101:19-29.

Griffin Til,  D.E.; Hill, W.E.  (1978)  In vitro  breakage of
     plasmid DNA by mutagens and pesticides.   Mutation Res.
     52:161-169.

Haworth, S.;  Lawler, T.; Mortelmans, K.; Speck,  W.;  Zeiger,  E.
     (1983)  Salmonella test results for 250  chemicals.  Environ.
     Mutagen.  5:3-142.
                               A-22

-------
 Maslansky,  C.J.;  Williams, G.M.   (1981)   Evidence for an epigenetic
    mode  of action  in  organochlorine pesticide hepatocarcinogenicity
    A lack  of genotoxicity in  rat, mouse, and hamster hepatocytes.
    J.  Toxicol.  Environ.  Hlth.  8:121-130.

 Maruyama, I.   (1980),  cited  in Simmon, ej: a_l. (1977).

 Mortelmans, K. ;  Haworth,  S.; Lawler, T.;  Speck, W.; Tainer, B.;
    Zeiger, E.   (1986)  Salmonella mutagenicity tests.  II.
    Rsults  from  the  testing  of 270 chemicals.  Environ. Mutagen.  8
    (Suppl. 7):1-119.

 National  Toxicology  Program  (1983)  NTP  mutagenesis  (Salmonella
    typhimurium)  test  results:   Chlordane (Chemical No. 18).  NTP
    Bulletin No.  9  (April 1983),  p, 6  (Table 3).

 Probst, G.S.; McMahon,  R.E.; Hill, L.E.;  Thompson, C.Z.; Epp,
    J.K.; Neal,  S.B.   (1981)   Chemically  induced unscheduled DNA
    synthesis in  primary  rat hepatocyte cultures:  A  comparison
    with  bacterial  mutagenicity using  218 compounds.  Environ.
    Mutagen. 3:11-32.

 Simmon, Y.F.; Kauhanen, K.;  Tardiff, R.G.   (1977)  Mutagenic
    activity of  chemical  identified in drinking water.  Dev.
    Toxicol. Environ.  Sci. 2:249-258.

 Simmon, V.F.; Tanaka,  G.  (1977), cited in  Simmon, e_t a_l.  (1977).

 Sobti, R.C.; Krishnan,  A.; Davies, J.  (1983)  Cytokinetic  and
    cytogenetic effect  of agricultural chemicals on human  lymphoid
    cells in vitro.  Arch. Toxicol. 52:221-231.

 Telang, S. ;  Tong, C.;  Williams,  G.M.   (1982),  Epigenetic membrane
    effects of a  possible tumor-promoting type on cultured  liver
    cells by the  nongenotoxic  organochlorine pesticides chlordane
    and heptachlor.  Carcinogenesis 3:1175-1178.

 Tong,  C.; Fazio,  M.; Williams,  G.M.  (1981)  Rat hepatocyte-
    mediated mutagenesis  of  human cells by  carcinogenic polycyclic
    aromatic hydrocarbons but  not organochlorine pesticides.
    Proc. Soc, Exptl.  Biol.  Med.  167:572-575.

 Vigfusson,  N.V.;  Vyse,  E.R.; Pernsteiner, C.A.;  Dawson, R.J.
    (1'333)   In vivo  induction  of  sister-chromatid exchange  in
    Umbra limT by the  insecticides endrin,  chlordane, diazinon,
    and guthion.  Mutation Res.  118:61-68.

Wildeman, A.G.; Nazar,  R.N.  (1982)  Significance of  plant
    metabolism in the  mutagenicity and toxicity  of pesticides.
    Canad.  J. Genet, Cytol.  24:437-449.
                              .  A-23

-------

-------
APPENDIX I
 A-25

-------
           UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                         WASHINGTON, D.C. Z0460
                                                          OFFICB OF
                                                   PBSTICIDKS AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT;

PROM:
TO:
THRU!
Chlordane/Heptachlor Mutagenicity

Irving Mauer, Ph.D., Geneticist
Toxicology Branch
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)

Henry Spencer, Ph.D., Pharmacologist
Section 7, Toxicology Branch
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)

Jane E. Harris, Ph.D.
Section Head, Toxicology Branch
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)
     This  is  in response  to  your  request for an expeditious
appraisal  of  the positive mutagenicity studies for chlordane
and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide,  as  reported in the CAG
document ("Carcinogenicity Risk Assessment for Chlordane and
Heptachlor/Heptachlor  Epoxide").   The  negative reports listed
in that document were  also scanned.

     Based upon recent Velsicol submissions (Accession Nos-.
254320 and 254324) and other information available to me (NTP,
EMIC), two general conclusions are warranted from this preliminary
assessment (see below  for a  summary of available data):

     1.  Although the  adequacy of the  data base as reported
         could not be  undertaken  (e.g., DER's) because of the
         timely response  requested,  it appears that all the
         genetic end-points  we require to be assayed  (gene
         mutation, chromosomal aberrations, DMA damage/repair)
         have been addressed.
                             A-26

-------
    exposed central mudminnows (Umbra limi),  as well as
    in CHO cells in culture and in a human lymphoid cell
    line  (one report each).  Whereas the positive SCE in
    fish was recorded at nonlethal concentrations (added
    to aquarium water), both in vitro studies were only
    marginally positive (less than twofold above controls)
    at toxic concentrations.  Only one of the four studies
    assaying for unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) ir\ vitro
    was positive (in VA-4 cells,  an SV-transformed~human
    cell line), but only in the absence of metabolic
    activation (negative with MA).  Technical chlordane
    was negative for UDS in primary hepatocyte cultures
    from rats, mice, and hamsters (two reports) as well
    as in a human fibroblast cell line (D-550).  Finally,
    gene conversion was reported  in yeast cells
    (S. cerevisiae D4)  exposed to an activation system
    (negative without), but too few data are  included in
    the article to properly interpret the results.

2-   Heptachlor/Heptachlor Epoxide.  In contrast to the
    positive results for (gene) mutagenicity reported for
    chlordane (both technical and reagent grades), the
    available data for  heptachlor and its epoxide is
    consistently negative (three  Ames and/or  E_. coli, one
    !•  subtilis rec assay,  1 ARL-HGPRT, two Drosophila
    SLRL,  1 HPC/UDS).   Reversions to histidine prototrophy
    in Salmonella TA-1535 and 100 under activation conditions
    to an  unstated dose range,  as well as to the wild-type
    (nonwaxy)  phenotype in  corn pollen grains were reported
    by  the same investigator who  found "commercial" chlordane
    positive.

    Adequate  reports on dominant-lethal assays in mice
    were  negative,  but  an abstract from a meeting reported
    positive  results, for both germinal (DLT)  and somatic
    (bone  marrow)  chromosome damage in rats fed 1 and 5
    ppm of  an  unstated  formulation of heptachlor for
    three  generations.   A Russian study also reported
    positive  chromosome damage in bone marrow cells from
    "white  male mice"  treated i.p. with "heptachlor"
    (also  of  unstated source and  purity) at a single dose
    level  stated to be  "4%  of the LD50."  Too few procedural
    details are included in these "positive" studies to
    interpret  the  results reported.

    As  with chlordane,  negative UDS results have  been
    reported  for heptachlor technical in primary  rodent
    hepatocytes (two reports), but a positive  recorded in
    VA-4 cells  (virus-transformed human fibroblasts) for
    both the  technical  and  epoxide, but only with metabolic
                       A-27

-------
     2.  Consistent with the results of  mutagenicity  testing
         previously reported for other agents  of  this chemical
         class (organochlorines such as  Lindane,  chloroform,
         Inter alia), the mutagenic potential  of  these chemicals
         are low to unsubstantial.   Hence,  from the available
         data it would appear their oncogenic  potential derives
         from mechanisms other than "genetic initiation"  (direct
         interaction with DNA).  [There  is  suggestive evidence
         in mammalian systems (the  few promotion  assays available)
         of an "epigenetic" mode of action  for these  chemicals.]

Survey of Available Literature

     1.  Chlordane-technical (but not reagent-grade  alpha-
         chlordane, gamma-chlordane, and gamma-chlordene) was
         positive in adequate bacterial (Ames) assays (three
         positive, one negative), but consistently so only in
         the most sensitive strain  (TA-100), and  only at very
         high concentrations (5000 ucj/plate and above).  Testing
         for mutagenicity in mammalian cells in culture  (four
         reports) revealed inconsistent results (two positive,
         two negative), due in part to the different  test systems
         employed.  The. two negatives were reported for HGPRT
         in ARL  (adult rat liver) and for both thioguanine and
         diphtheria-toxin resistance in V79 (Chinese  hamster
         lung) cells.  One of the positives was for ouabain
         resistance in V79 cells, but reported for only  a single
         concentration of an unstated formulation, at less than
         50 percent cell survival;  the second was found  in non-
         activated mouse lymphoma cells (L5178Y-TK),  but  the
         study is incomplete since metabolic activation  was not
         employed.

         The plant systems may activate chlordane to  mutagenic
         derivatives  is suggested by a  single article reporting
         both gene conversion  in Saccharomyces cerevisiae D4
         cultures exposed to a reagent  grade  (presumably alpha-
         chlordane according to  the CAS Number stated),  and
         reversion to wild  type  in  pollen  grains  from the
         homozygous "waxy"  strain W22 of Zea  mays  (corn) exposed
         to a '"commercial-grade  formulation."  However,  too  few
         procedural details were reported  to  adequately interpret
         these results.

         Although reportedly negative  for  gross  chromosomal
         damage  in vivo  (two mouse  DLT's)  and in vitro  (CHO
         cells),  technical  chlordane  or one of  its  principal
         components  (alpha-chlordane)  apparently has DNA-
         damaging activity,  as  revealed in a  single  study
         reporting  increased  dose-dependent sister-chromatid
         exchanges  (SCE)  in  intestinal  cells  sampled from

                            A-28

-------
          activation (in contrast to chlordane,  positive  only
          in the absence of activation).  [The mutagenicity
          data bas'e for heptachlor epoxide is less than adequate
          to. satisfy FIFRA guidelines.]

 Discussion

      Recent studies have suggested that organochlorines
 (Lindane,  chlordane, heptachlor, inter  alia) do not interact
 directly with DNA (i.e., are not " ge no toxic""),  but rather  act
  epigenetically"  by mechanisms affecting cell membrane
 permeability and/or following an irreversible "initiating
 event"  (i.e., are "promoters" ensuring  survival of preexisting
 transformed cells).   The following citations employing chlordane
 heptachlor available for this "quick-and-dirty" review (and
 listed  in  the CAG document)  are consistent  with this suggestion:

          Inhibition  of metabolic cooperation in mixed cultures
         consisting  of thioguanine-resistant and TG-sensitive
         cells (several reports from both Williams1 and  Trosko's
         labs).

         The  putative  positive UDS results  in cells already
         "initiated"  (e.g.,  the SV-40 transformed cell line,
         VA-4).

         Inhibition  of DNA synthesis and/or cell cycle mechanisms
         by severely  toxic concentrations leading to perturbation
         of repair  (increased UDS,  SCE).
1.
cc:  Dr. Amy Rispin
     Science Intergration  Staff
     Hazard Evaluation  Division  (TS-769C)
                             A-29

-------
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF REPORTED POSITIVE STUDIES
Can pound

CHLOROANE























Test | Test
Hater lal 1 Assay 1 System
|
Technical (Gene Mutation Ames (all)
|
I
Technical JGene Mutation Ames (all)
1

Technical JGene Mutation) Ames (TA 98,
1
1
Reagent |Gene Mutation
(alpha) |
"Commercial n|Gene Mutation
1
(Unstated) |0uabaln
1 resist.
1
(Unstated) (Gene Mutation
1
1
Technical | In vivo SCE
1
1
Reaaant I In vitro SCE
(alpha) |

1
(Unstated) I In vitro UPS
1
Reagent |Cel 1 cycle
(gamma) | Inhlb.
Reagent |ln vitro CA/
(alpha) | SCE
I
Reagent I Gene Mutation
100)
Sacch. - 04

Z. mays
Po 1 1 en
V79 cells
ARL/HGPRT
Mudmlnnow

LAZ-007 cells

VA-4 cells

L5178Y eel 1
CHO cells

L5176Y/TK
Dose/Cone. | | TB |
Range I Reference | Evaluation)
1 1
1
Comments

20-100 (Simmon 5t_£l_. (ACCEPT. (POS. only In TA 100
| (77)
1 1
1
1


) 10-5000 (Simmon and (ACCEPT. (a) EOUIV In TA 98
) 1000-50, 000 | Tanaka (77)
I
|b> POS. In TA 100
1

5-10,000 (Maruyama (80) (ACCEPT. (POS. In TA 100; NEG.
1
I
1
(Unstated) (JBntlle et al.
| (82)
1
(Unstated) (Ibid
1
|
I
(Only 1 dose (Ahmed et al.
reported) | (77b)
1
3 -6 '
10-10 M |Telang et al .
| (82)
5.4/10~12-10~9|vigfusson et al.
j (83)
I
fi 3 '
10-10 M (Sobtl et aj .
I (83)
1
1,10, 100, 1000|Ahmed et al.
uM | (77a)
~~ I
1
4_ug/ml I Brubaker et al.
(70)
(Unstated) (NTP (85)
1
(Multiple) NTP (85)
[
I
In TA 98
1
INCONCL. |POS. only * S9; too
1
few data
I
INCONCL. (Tech not tested; too
1
few data
1
INCONCL. "Weak" at < 50<
| survival; few data
ACCEPT. (NEC. for HGPRT, but
POS. for promotion
(ACCEPT. (Oose-dependent POS.
1
j INCONCL.
1

< 2-fold Increase;
no dose response

(ACCEPT. POS. only without S9
1
| INCONCL.
INCONCL.
1
1 NCONCL •

NEG. for ONA, POS. for
G2 arrest; only 1 dost
NEG. for CA; POS. for
1 SCE
1
|Not tested with S9
                      A-30

-------
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF REPORTED POSITIVE STUDIES  (cont'd)
1 Test |
Compound | Material | Assay
HEPTACHLOR









1
| Technical JGene Mutation
t
1
1
1
(Unstated) |Gene Mutation
.
1
(Unstated) .,

Epoxide

(Unstated)

In vl-tro UOS

Test
System
Ames (all)

ARL/HGPRT

VA-4 eel Is

In vitro UDS
VA-4 eel Is
1
In vivo CA

Dose/Cone. |
Range | Reference
1
((Unstated) |Gentl le et al .
j (82)
TB
Evaluation
INCONCL.

10" to 10" M|Telang et^al. ACCEPT.

100,1000 uM

(82)
Ahmed et a 1 .
(77a)
10,100,1000 uMl Ibid.


Mouse BM |5 mg/kg |Markarjan (66)

| (Unstated) (OLT/BM-CA Rat repro.
1
1
| Technical
I

study

In vitro CA/
SCE
CHO eel Is j

- I 1 | |


1 , 5 ppm jCerey (74)




(Multip.le) |NTP (85)





INCONCL.



INCONCL.

INCONCL.


1 NCONCL .



1
1
|POS. In TA 1535/100,
I Out on 1 / v I tn S9
1
INEG. for HGPRT-; POS.
I for promotion
1
|POS. only with S9 , Out
| no va 1 ues for UOS
1
| no values for UOS
I
|Too few procedural
I deta its; 1 dose
1
1 1 Abstract!
|
1
I
1
|POS. for both CA and
I SCE, Out too few
deta I Is aval laOle
                       A-31

-------

-------
                          APPENDIX B
          UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                      WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                                        OFFICE OF
                                                 PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
 MEMORANDUM
 SUBJECT;
 FROM:
TO:
THRU-:
 The  Mutagenicity  Assessment  (Gene-Tox Profile)  of
 Heptachlor/Heptachlor Epoxide:   Addendum to  the
 Registration Standard
                                              Caswell Nos.  474
                                                           474F
TB  Projects:   0007
                                    *•• ^-» «*rf VW V,. J. _!.  JL^ \^/ ^ «


               ^^       f) /^
Irving Mauer,  Ph.D.    ^^^^^^^^^i
Toxicology Branch     /^^^           /^/-^/^-
Hazard Evaluation Division  (TS-769C)

Henry Spencer,  Ph.D.
Toxicology Branch
Hazard Evaluation Division  (TS-769C)

        and

Amy S. Rispin,  Ph.D.
Science Integration Staff
Hazard Evaluation Division  (TS-769C)
Judy Hauswirth, Ph.D., Acting Head  .
Section VI, Toxicology Branch       ':
Hazard Evaluation Division  (TS-769C)
                                                     td
     The attached assessment of  the mutagenicity  of .heptachlor*
was developed from reviews of  the  available  published  literature
located by Dynamac Corporation,  as well  as articles filed  with
    Technical heptachlor is a  ternary mixture  of  related  chlorinated
    methanoindene compounds,  typically  containing 72  to  73  percent
    l,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7-methanol-lH-
    indene (CAS Registry No.  76-44-8) as  principal active ingredient,
    18 to 20 percent trans  (gamma) and  2  to  3  percent  cis (alpha)-
    chlordane (CAS No. 57-74-9), and  5  percent nonachlor  (CAS  No.
    3734-49-4),  plus about  1  to 2 percent other manufacturing
    impurities.   Heptachlor is readily  metabolized in  mammals  to
    the epoxide  (2,3,4,5,6,7,7-heptachloro-la,Ib,5,5a,6,6a-hexahy-
    dro-2,5-methano-2H-ideno(1,2-b) oxirene	CAS No.  1024-57-3).
                            B-l

-------
the Environmental Mutagen Information Center (EMIC,  Oak  Ridge
National Laboratory) for evaluation in Phase I  of  the  Agency s
GENE-TOX PROGRAM.  A preliminary appraisal of some of  these
studies** as summarized by the Carcinogen Assessment Group
(GAG)*** is also incorporated, since the conclusions in  that
nreliminary discussion are consistent with those derived from
Ihfs morJ comprehensive evaluation   There appears to  have.been
no submissions of .primary gene-tox (mutagenicity )  studies by
registrants (Caswell No. 474).

     As provided previously for the Registration Standards of
other organochlorine insecticides  (aldrin/dieldrin) , this mutagen-
icity aslessement  is organized as  follows:  A discussion and
evaluation  (for  regulatory purposes) of  the data base located by
both mljor"  sources  (DYNAMAC;  EMIC/GENE-TOX  PROGRAM) , tabulated
according to the FIFRA  categories  of genetic effect (gene mutation,
chromosomal damage, primary DNA damage/repair,  and  other mechanisms),
lonoweSby our  conclusions,  as well  as  recommendations  to satisfy
both regulatory  requirements  ("data gaps")  and  to  indicate
farther  testing  the results  from which would be useful  for risk
characterization.

     Although  a  definitive genetic toxicology  profile cannot  be
established from the  individual  published studies ^viewed here,
collectively  they  permit the  following preliminary conclusions.

      1.   Neither heptachlor  nor heptachlor epoxide appears  to be
          mutagenic in  microbial  or mammalian cells.
     2
     3.
          Althouah negative for chromosome damage in germinal
          assays? thS potential for somatic cytogenetic activity
          has not been adequately evaluated.

          The combined results of DNA repair assays indicate that
          heptachlor is not genotoxic in bacterial, yeast, or
          mammalian cells.
         genotoxic mechanisms.

     In addition to our previous  cursory  assessment  (Appendix  I),
a listing of pSSliShed articles  cited  is  attached as Appendix  II.

Attachments

^  ..r-hlordang/Heptachlor  Mutagenicity , "  memorandum:  Mayer to
    Spencer, December lb,                 "
*** Carcinogen  Assessment
     Carcnogen   ssessm
     for Chlordane  and H^phaehlor/Heptachlor Epoxide  (DRAFT,
     December,  1985) .
                                 B-2

-------
                     MUTAGENICITY OF HEPTACHLOR
  The  Data  Base
Genetic
Endpoint
Gene
Mutation
Chromosome
Aberration
DNA Damage/
Repair
Other
Mechanisms
ssays with techni
ormulations) , dis
Test
System
Bacterial
Mammalian cell
in vivo
in vitro
in vivo

in vitro
in vivo
in vitro
in vivo
cal heptachlor/heptach
tributed according to <
Chemical
JHeptachlor
12
1
2
4
6
1
2
|H. epoxide
'•'• 5
2
2
'
1
_
-
                                                              DiT
 r,M»^         (47%)  of  these reports  are inadequate  (judged
 UNACCEPTABLE)  to support the negative  results  reported,  because
 of  one  or  more of the  following  deficiencies:

     -  No  primary data  presented,  and/or only  qualitative
        assessments  (+/-);


     -  Preliminary  screening surveys or new  techniques,  with
        insufficient  details/procedures;    ••.•-•

     -  Only one  dose or  insufficient (nontoxic)  doses  tested  in
        incomplete assays;


     -  Assays  with no positive controls to assure sensitivity  of
        the test  system  to  respond; and                        L

     -  Inappropriate procedures/test systems.

However, these studies were  considered  to corroborate  the
conclusions from  the minority of sufficiently  adequate assays
                               B-3

-------
(10, or 31%)  judged ACCEPTABLE.   An equal  number  of  assays were
judged "inconclusive" because they reported unconfirmed  presump-
tively) positive results which could not be satisfactorily
interpreted,  due to inadequate procedures  or controls, and/or
the reporting of qualitative assessments in assays compromised by
coSfliSinJ Sariabies.  Some of these studies are useful, however,
in directing  attention to further testing  necessary  to establish
the mechanism(s) of action possessed by these organochlorines,
discussed more fully below.

     Since the available data base is incomplete  in  some of  the
genetic endpoints  (as indicated in the above summary table  ,
further testing is recommended (see below) in order  to satisfy
both the regulatory requirements for continued registration  of
heptachlor formulations and to provide approaches to risk
characterization.

Discussion and Evaluation of Assay Results

     The results of all published  studies  conducted with technical
heotachlor/heptachlor epoxide, as  well  as  other  formulations of
this^rganochlorine  insecticide, are summarized  below in tabular
form  (following this  discussion).

A.   Survey  Studies

     As  indicated  in  the  summary  table, a number of  these reports
are considlrel  technically  inadequate  and unacceptable  in meeting
Regulatory requirements,  but  tend  to support the overall conclusions
drawn  from fully adequate studies  discussed below.

     Thus  as  reported  by Moriya  et al. (1983),  concentrations  up
to  5000  Si/plate Sf  heptachlo/andTtKe- oxidation product, heptachlor
eooxide, were  negative  for mutagenicity in both  the Salmonella
tvgnimurium/mammalian microsome  (Ames test) a"g  theEsch^richia
coli  trvotophan reversion assays.   Similarly, qualitative  negative
limits  were reported over a onefold to 10,000-fold nonactivated
Ind S9 activated  dose range of heptachlor in the concentration
agar  gradient test with eight S.  typhimurium and two E. £oli
trains  (Probst et al.  1981).  In an unactivated spot test,
II  ug/disc of hepTachlor was also negative with four S. typhimurium
and~two E.  coli strains  (Shirasu et al.  1976).

      Gentile et al.   (1982) reported ^.technical but not
commercial gride"eptachlor induced a  2.3-fold  and  1^ fold

^-^^^l^^^ *                 " and

   'is    r sish



                                 B-4

-------
 doses lower than 10 ug/mL to support a dose-related increase;
 moreover, the increase with TA100 was only slightly higher  than
 2-fold at the highest dose, and the background spontaneous  frequency
 for TA98 (112) was excessive.                               < is

      The same authors also reported that 889 uM technical
 heptachlor induced a 2.3-fold increase in revertents in  S.
 typhimurium TA1535 cultures exposed to a IS fraction derived from
 corn microsomes; this finding was also considered inconclusive
 evidence for a positive response for the same reasons as above.

      In the same article, Gentile and associates also reported
 positive results in a reverse mutation assay using  commercial  '•
 grade heptachlor on Zea mays at the waxy (wx) locus.  In this
 study,  1.12 kg/hectare of the formulation was sprayed in situ on
 mutant  seeds (wx~/wx~) prior to the emergence of corn seedlings.
 Plants  were allowed to grow 12 to 14 weeks and pollen grains were
 harvested,  dehydrated, and stained.  The authors reported a
 significant increase (p < 0.05)  in back mutations of wx~ to wx*.
 However,  because essential primary data were not present, the
 results  are considered inconclusive, but heptachlor is listed as
 a  presumptive mutagen in this study.

      Four survey articles evaluated the potential of heptachlor
 to  interact with and damage DNA (Shirasu e_t al.  1986; Gentile et al.
 1982; Griffin and Hill 1978;  Seller 1977).   When 20 ug/disc of~~n~otv^
 activated heptachlor were placed on a Petri dish, Shirasu and
 associates  recorded no preferential inhibition of Bacillus  subtilis
 repair-deficient M45 relative to the repair-proficient wild-type,
 H17.  Similarly,  Griffin and Hill reported that  0.1 mg/mL hepta-
 chlor did not induce singlestrand breaks or alkali-labile sites
 in  purified  Col  El  DNA derived from _E.  coli K12, and the Gentile
 group reported  that four doses of technical or commercial grade
 heptachlor  over  a threefold to hundredfold dilution range,  with
 or  without  rat  liver S9 or corn  IS microsomal fractions, were not
 recombinogenetic  in Saccharomyces cerevisiae D4.

      Finally,  Seiler (1977)  reported that there  was no increased
 inhibition  of  testicular DNA synthesis  in mice exposed by gavage
 to  40 mg/kg  heptachlor.   Although the author provided data  that
 indicate  a  high  rate of  detection of mutagens/carcinogens in the
 inhibition  of  testicular DNA synthesis  assay, several well  docu-
mented genotoxic/carcinogenic agents gave a negative response  in
 this  test system  (ethylenethiourea,  aminotriazole,  maleic hydrazide,
and isoniazid).   Hence,  interpretation  of a negative result in
 this assay  is  unclear.

     Although  individually the data provided by  these survey
articles  were  insufficient to form definitive conclusions and
thus unacceptable  in  meeting  regulatory requirements, nevertheless
the data  collectively  provide evidence  that heptachlor is not
                                B-5

-------
mutagenic in bacteria.   In addition,  apparently  heptachlor does
not cause other genotoxic responses in bacteria  or  yeast.  On
the other hand, the ability of heptachlor  to  induce  a mutagenic
response in corn is not clearly established.

B.   Primary Studies

     A respectable number of genotoxic assays with  heptachlor did
contain sufficient primary data for review and evaluation according
to FIFRA genetic points.
1.   Gene Mutation

     a.  Bacteria
         Heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide were assayed in three Ames
tests.  Marshall et al.  (1976) showed that both heptachlor and
heptachlor epoxide were  cytotoxic at doses that exceeded 2500
uq/plate in the absence  of metabolic activation provided by rat
S9, and 1000 ug/plate  in the  presence of  rat S9 activation, but
neither agent~was mutagenic over decreasing twofold dilutions
ranging from 1000 to 50  ug/plate.  Although the more  sensitive
S. typhimurium TA98 and  TA100 were not  included in the assays,
the study is acceptable, since the study  was properly controlled
in that heptachlor and the epoxide product were adequately  tested
in S. typhimurium TA1535, TA1536, TA1537, and TA1538.

         Glatt et al.  (1983)  evaluated  six half-log dilutions
(3000-10 ug/plate) of  heptachlor epoxide  with or without  rat  S9
activation" in the Ames assay  (strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538,
TA98, and TA100) and found that the  test  material was insoluble
at concentrations of 300 ug/plate or greater.   Their  results
further showed that the  epoxidation  product of  heptachlor was
negative.  By contrast,  the authors  clearly demonstrated  the
sensitivity of the test  system to detect  epoxides of  several
potent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon  carcinogens.

         In an ancillary assay reported in  the  same  publication,
Glatt and associates assayed  the  same  six selected doses  of S9-
activated heptachlor epoxide  (10  to  3000  ug/plate) using  TA93 in
the presence of the epoxide hydrolase  inhibitor and  glutathione
depletor, 1,1,l-trichloropropene-2,3-oxide  (TCPO).   Under these
conditions, heptachlor epoxide was  not  mutagenic.  Since  the study
was well designed, properly controlled, and  heptachlor  epoxide
was assayed up to the  limit of solubility,  the  study is  acceptable.

         \s part of the  National  Toxicology  Program, heptachlor
was selected for evaluation  in the  preincubation  modification to
the Ames test with strains TA1535,  TA1537,  TA98,  and TA100 (NTP,
1983)   Preliminary studies  showed  that this compound precipitated
at doses exceeding 1000  ug/plate.   Two independent assays were
conducted with  five nonactivated  doses (0.3 to 1000  ug/plate in

-------
 experiment 1 and 0.1 to 10 ug/plate in experiment 2).   No increase
 in His4" colonies of any strain was reported for either study.
 Five doses (100 to 10,000 ug/plate) were used for the  SB-activated
 preincubation assays; samples were preincubated for 20 minutes-
 with the appropriate strain and either 10 percent rat  or hamster
 S9 cofactor mixes.  In two independent assays,  S9-activated
 heptachlor was not mutagenic.  Thus, heptachlor appears to have
 been adequately tested up to an insoluble level in a properly
 controlled study.   Therefore, this study is acceptable, and  we
 conclude that heptachlor is nonmutagenic in this preincubation
 modification of the Ames assay.

          Finally,  van Dijck and van der Voorde  (1976)  found  that
 isomer A of technical heptachlor epoxide was negative  in seven
 Ames strains of £3.  typhimurium capable of detecting base-substitution,
 frameshift, and differential toxicity, when tested up  to cytotoxic
 doses in the absence and presence of mouse mammalian activation
 (S9)  systems.
                                                              t^,
      b.   Mammalian  Cells

          Telang et  al.  (1982) exposed 4 x 10^ primary  adult  rat
 liver epithelial cells  (ARL) to six concentrations of  heptachlor
 (10~3 to 10~6  M)  in two independent experiments.  Heptachlor was
 cytotoxic  at  10~3  M but at no dose was there an increase in  the
 frequency  of  6-thioguanine-resistant mutants (6-TGr).   By contrast,
 the  positive  controls,  benzo [a]pyrene (B[a]P) or 7,12-dimethylbenz-
 [a]anthracene  (DMBA),  induced definitive mutagenic responses.
 This  study was  judged  acceptable and the results demonstrated ,
 that  heptachlor is  not  mutagenic in mammalian liver cells.

      c.   In Vivo

         The negative  sex-linked lethal result  reported for  both
 heptachlor and  its  epoxide in Drosophila (Benes and Sram, 1969)
 is discounted because of  the low dosage necessary in testing this
 organochlorine  insecticide.

      d.  Conclusions  for  Gene Mutation

         Heptachlor and/or the oxidation product, heptachlor
 epoxide, were extensively  investigated in £.  typhimurium using
 nonactivated and rat and/or  hamster S9-activation conditions.
 Uniformly,  the  results  indicated that heptachlor was not mutagenic
 in bacteria.  In the only  published mammalian cell gene mutation
 study available  for review,  the  results were also negative.  No
mammalian,  cell  assays were conducted using the  cell lines for
which large data bases  exist (mouse lymphoma, Chinese  hamster
ovary cells, or  V79), and  we recommend that at  least one such
assay be conducted  to confirm the negative result found in primary
ARL cells.
                                B-7

-------
2.   Structural Chromosome Aberrations

     a.  Somatic Cells

         Only -two studies assaying the  potential  clastogenic
(chromosome-breakage) effects of heptachlor  on  somatic  cells were
located for review, both considered inconclusive,  although
reporting presumptively positive results.

         In a study reported only as an abstract  of  a presentation
at a meeting of the European Environmental Mutagen Society,  Cerey
and associates (1973) claimed that 1 and 5 mg/kg/day heptachlor
(of unstated purity and source) caused  increased  "abnormal  mitoses"
in the mouse bone marrow cells of the F2 and F3 generations of  a
dietary reproduction study, but provided no other details.   The
same incompletely reported study also stated that "increased
resorptions"  ("dominant lethals"?) were found.   In the  second
study, Markaryan (1966) reported that the intraperitoneal injection
of "0.0052 mg/g heptachlor"  (stated to represent  "4% of the LD50"
for mice) produced "nuclear disturbances" and unspecified "breakage"
in bone marrow cells of an unstated number of mice.  In addition
to inappropriate sampling techniques employed by this investigator,
no attempt was made to differentiate the purely cytological
effects of treatment from the standard categories of cytogenetic
damage, hence the positive result claimed cannot be properly
interpreted.

     b.  Germinal Cells

         In the mouse dominant  lethal assay performed by Arnold
et al. (1977) a 25:75% blend of  heptachlor:heptachlor epoxide was
administered  once by gavage  (7.5  and 15 mg/kg) or i.p.  (7.5 and
15 mg/kg) to  eight male mice per  experimental  dose; two  control
groups (eight males/group) were  used for  each  treatment  group.
The authors reported no significant  increase in  dominant lethal
indices over  a 6-week consecutive  mating  sequence  (three untreated
females/male/week).  The  parameters  measured were pregnancy rates,
total  implants, number of early  deaths,  and the  embryonic  index.

         No toxic signs were seen during  the main  study; however,
preliminary acute  toxicity  studies performed by  these  investigators
showed that the heptachlor  blend administered  either by gavage  or
i.p. was toxic at  30  and  100 mg/kg.  Although  the  study was
performed without  a  concurrent positive control, the  study is
acceptable and showed  that  the maximum nontoxic  dose  of the
heptachlorrheptachlor  epoxide mixture  did not  induce  a dominant
lethal effect.

         In an earlier  study Epstein et al. (1972)  tested  a total
of  174 materials,  which  included heptachlor and  heptachlor epoxide,
in mouse dominant  lethal  assays.  Groups of seven and. nine male
                                B-8

-------
 mice received 4.8  and  24  mg/kg  heptachlor,  respectively, by i.p.
 injection and other groups  of  12  animals  each  were dosed by
 gavage for 5 consecutive  days with  5  and  10 mg/kg/day.  The
 concurrent negative control group consisted of 10 males.  Following
 dosing,  the males  were sequentially mated  (three untreated females)
 for 8 weeks.   Females  were  sacrificed 13  days  after mating and
 were scored for  pregnancy,  total  implants,  and early  fetal deaths.
 Based on the  detailed  criteria  developed  by the authors to evaluate
 assay validity and positive responses,  heptachlor was assessed to
 be  negative.   Although no pharmacotoxic responses were reported
 for the  i.p.  dosed groups,  two  of the males that received either
 5 or 10  mg/kg of test  material  by gavage  died.  Therefore,
 heptachlor did not induce dominant  lethal  effects in mice when
 assayed  up to a  toxic  dose  level; and since all appropriate
 controls were included, the study is  acceptable.              :

          Heptachlor epoxide (6  and  30 mg/kg, i.p. and 8 mg/kg,
 P.O.  x5)  was  also  investigated  by Epstein  and  associates.  No ;-
 toxic  response was reported for the i.p.-dosed animals; howeve'r,
 4 to 9 males  exposed by gavage  died.  No  dominant lethal effects
 among  offspring  of females  mated  with the  heptachlor  epoxide-
 treated  males were observed.  Since heptachlor epoxide was also  '
 assayed  up to a  toxic  dose,  the study is  acceptable.

      c.   Conclusions for  Structural Chromosomal Aberrations

          Only inconclusive  evidence for heptachlor to induce
 chromosomal aberration  in somatic cells was available for review.
 On  the other  hand,  in  two adequate  mouse  dominant lethal assays,
 neither  the parent nor epoxidation  product  induced major chromosome
 aberrations  in male germinal cells.

 3.   Other Mutagenic Mechanisms

     a.   DNA  Repair  in Mammalian  Cells

          Maslansky and'Williams (1981)  assayed 10"1 to 10~6 M
 heptachlor  for unscheduled  DNA  synthesis  (UDS)  in rat, mouse, and
 hamster  primary  hepatocytes.  In  three  separate experiments,  30
morphologically  normal cells/experiment/species were  scored for
 nuclear  grains at  the  highest noncytotoxic  dose only.  Heptachlor
at _>  10"^  M was  cytotoxic in all  of these  cell systems and there
were no  significant increases in  net  nuclear grain counts at  10~5  M
heptachlor.   The positive control,  DMBA,  adequately demonstrated
 the sensitivity  of  the test  system  to detect UDS in rat, mouse,
and hamster hepatocytes.  The study is  acceptable and showed  that
heptachlor assayed up  to  a  cytotoxic  level  was not genotoxic  in
rodent hepatocytes.

          Probst  et al.  (1981) confirmed the lack of heptachlor-
induced  UDS   esponse in rat  hepatocytes.   No significant  increase
                                B-9

-------
in net nuclear grain counts was seen in 20 morphologically normal
hepalocytes exposed to the maximum noncytotoxic dose of heptachlor
(10 nmol/mL).

         In contrast to the negative results in primary rodent
hepatocytes, Ahmed et al. (1977) reported «ualj;tativ;.?^?"°! °f
a UDS response in a virus (SV-40) transformed human fibroblast
cell line  (VA-4) exposed to S9-activated doses of heptachlor
UOO and 1000 uM) aSd heptachlor epoxide  (10, 100, and 1000uM).
it should be noted that hydroxyurea treatment was used to block
cell entry  into scheduled (S-phase) DNA synthesis.  The -lack of
priLry data and the inability  to determine  if the response was
dose related, however, precludes acceptance  of these data as
definitive  evidence of a genotoxic response.  These data  are
suspect for the following reasons:
          1.
          2.
          3.
   The SV-40, VA-4 is a transformed cell line; a panel
   of experts1 has recommended  that only nontransformed
   diploid human cells be used  in  this assay.

   The cells used  in  this study were  not grown under
   reduced serum or arginine  deprivation conditions  in
   conjunction with hydroxyurea to ensure  complete
   blockage of S-phase synthesis,  increasing the
   possibility of  a false positive response.

   The  length of exposure  in  the presence  of S9  activation
    (8 hours) was  twice  the  recommended exposure  time;
   hence,  the  increases  in  UDS may have been related to
    the  cytotoxicity  of  the  S9 fraction.

    Several agents  that  were also demonstrated to induce
    strong  responses  in  this study, i.e., Diquat, 2,4-D
    fluid,  and  carbaryl,  have been reported elsewhere . to.
    be  nongenotoxic or weakly genotoxic.

5.   The  results were not confirmed.

6.   The  slides were not reported as being  coded to
    eliminate bias.
          4.
 but
    363-410.
                                 B-10

-------
 inconclusive  presumptive  genotoxins' for  SV-40  transformed human
 cells.                                                        ..,.,;
                                                            '»• W i*r .
                                                              -"»
      b.   Inhibition  of  Spindle  Apparatus

          Markaryan  (1966)  reported  that  anaphase  and early  telophase
 bone  marrow cells harvested  from  male mice  exposed  to  0.0052 mg/g
 heptachlor for  21 hours had  increased frequencies of "nuclear
 disturbances, total  chromosome  rearrangements  (chromosome and
 chromatid brides and fragments),  and adhesions."  Based on     ,
 standard  procedures  practiced by  experts  in this  assay, however;,
 the study should be  considered  inconclusive as a  positive response
 for the following reasons:   .                               ?  «,

        (1)   The method used to prepare  anaphase  and telophase -  ...-
              plates  (slices  of  bone marrow  stained  with acetocar-
              mine) has  a  tendency, to increase  the number of arti-
              facts and  lends itself to a  planar effect (causing
              chromosomes  to  be  excluded  from a field being  viewed);
              this makes it difficult to  distinguish between true
              chromosomal  rearrangements  and artifacts.

        (2)   The number of animals  investigated (three male mice)
              is an inadequate sample population.

        (3)   The inclusion of cytotoxic  effects (vacuolation,
              karyopyknosis,  and karyolysis) in the  total percent
              nuclear disturbances is an  indication  that severe
              cytotoxicity occurred  at the assay dose,  which was
              stated  to  be only  approximately 4 percent of  the  LD5Q.

        (4)   The authors  did not  report  that the  slides were coded.

Since the study results cannot  be properly  interpreted, the study
is considered inconclusive,  but presumed  positive until refuted
in an adequate assay.

     c.   Conclusions for  Other  Genetic Mechanisms

          Published studies that evaluated the  potential of  heptachlor
to interact with and damage  DNA provides  evidence that the  test
material  appears to  be  inactive in  rat,  mouse, or hamster  primary
hepatocyte cultures.  Based  on  a  single  inconclusive and  unconfirmed
positive  in VA-4 cells, both heptachlor  and heptachlor epoxide
are listed, with reservations,  as presumptively genotoxic  in
human cells.   The results of the  spindle  mechanism/inhibition;
assay performed in mouse  bone marrow cells  with heptachlor coujld
not be interpreted.                                  .-•-.•.  •;
                               B-ll

-------
4.   Epigenetic Effects

   ''" Telang et al. (1982) evaluated six concentrations of  heptachlor
(10~4 to 10~7 M) for the potential to inhibit intercellular
communication in mixed cultures of ARL (HGPRT~)  6-TGr mutant  and
normal ARL (HGPRT+) cells.  In a preliminary dose-selection test,
heptachlor was cytotoxic at 10~4 for ARL (HGPRT~)  cells.   In  the
presence of HGPRT+ cells, 1 x 10~6 to 1 x 10~7 M heptachlor markedly
inhibited the metabolic cooperation between the HGPRT-deficient
and HGPRTcompetent cells.  At 1 x 10~6 M, an almost complete
blockage of phosphoribosylated TG transfer between the cells  was
observed as indicated by the 140 percent and 95 percent recovery
Of 6-TGr mutants cocultivated with 0.75 and 1.25 x 106 HGPRT+
cells as compared to the controls.  Increased survival of  6-TGr
mutants was recorded at the remaining doses.

     The specificity of the assay to detect only agents which
interfere with cell-to-cell communication in contrast to chemicals
which induce a genotoxic effect was demonstrated with the  lipophilic
procarcinogen/promutagen B[a]P.  Four doses of B[a]P up to a
cytotoxic dose did not increase the recovery of TGr colonies.

     To support the conclusion that heptachlor interferes with
intercellular communication, the authors also evaluated the
effects of heptachlor on guanine metabolism of ARL cells,  dosed
at both the cytotoxic level and at those concentrations that
profoundly affected cell-to-cell communication in the primary
assay (10~4-10~6 M).  Heptachlor did not cause appreciable reductions
of [l4C]guanine conversion to its principal metabolites, and thus
such conversion is apparently not related to  intercellular
communication.

5.   Transformation Assays

     No studies assaying the potential for  heptachlor or heptachlor
epoxide to induce neoplastic transformation  in mammalian cells
were located.

Overall Conclusions/Recommendations

     Although adequate studies are still  required  in  some  areas,
the evaluation of the available data  in  published  literature on
heptachlor and its epoxide indicates  that  neither  directly inter-
feres with DNA or chromosomes, i.e.,  not  mutagenic  in the  sense
of initiating genetic effects likely  to  be  transmitted.   Thus,
sufficient evidence exists to conclude that neither  possesses
mutagenic activities in bacteria  but  further testing is needed  to
confirm the negative result for heptachlor  in other  than  the
single mammalian cell system tested,  as  well as  to assay  the
                                B-12

-------
 epoxide  in  at  least  one  sensitive  test system.  Additional studies
 are  also  necessary to  resolve presumptively positive mutagenic
 activities  under  specialized conditions, e.g., in plant systems.

     At  least  two adequate germinal assays indicate that neither
 organochlorine poses serious risks of transmissible chromosomal
 aberrations, but  the positive results in inadequate somatic
 chromosomal studies mandate further testing for this endpoint.
 Finally,  while confirmation of the negative results for DNA
 damage/repair  in  microbial and mammalian cells is available,
 comparable  assays with the epoxide are recommended to assess its
 potential, especially  for UDS in mammalian systems.

     On the other hand,  consistent with genetic toxicology
 assessments prepared for other members of this class (e.g^,
 aldrin/dieldrin,  lindane), these organochlorines probably act by
 epigenetic mechanisms  likely to promote/sustain cellular processes
 initiated by other agencies, thus  indirectly affecting primary
 genetic mechanisms.  Such activity is indicated by inadequate but
 presumptively positive unconfirmed studies for mitotic spindle
 effects,  inhibition of both cell-to-cell communication and DNA
 synthesis, as well as  the apparent potentiation of repair processes
 in transformed (i.e.,  initiated) mammalian cells.

     In order to affirm  the absence of a potential for direct
genotoxic activity, and  to complete regulatory requirements, the
 following additional testing is required:

     1.  Mammalian cell gene mutation assay with established test
         systems, e.g.  mouse lymphoma (L5178Y/TK), or Chinese •
         hamster  (CHO/V79/HGPRT) cells inter alia, specifically
         comparing activation systems (S9) derived from rat vs.
         mouse (or hamster) liver microsomes; and

     2.  Somatic cell cytogenetic assays, either in vitro or jji
         vivo.
                               B-13

-------
     Further,  to confirm the  potential  activity of  these chemicals
in indirect (epigenetic) processes2'5  the  following are recommended:

     1.   Adequately controlled promotion assays,  e.g.,  in  cell
         lines already initiated (by viral transformation), or
         exposed to known active chemical  initiators.

     2.   Mammalian cell transformation  in  systems with  an
         established data base, e.g.,  C3H  10  Tl/2,  BALE 3T3,
         inter alia.

     3.   Assays for mitotic spindle effects (in  vitro or jln.
         vivo), and/or involving other cellular  mechanisms
         (e.g. , oncogene activation),  inter alia.

     4.   Assays which can distinguish  effects on replicative
         S-phase (scheduled)  DNA synthesis from UDS, e.g., in
         primary hepatocytes  from several  species  (mouse  vs.
         rat/hamster) .
2 Malcolm, A.R.; Mills, L.J.; McKenna, E.J.  Inhibition of
  metabolic cooperation between Chinese hamster V79 cells by
  tumor promoters and other chemicals.  In:  Cellular Systems for
  Toxicity Testing, eds. Williams, G.M. ; Dunkel, V.C.; Ray, V.A. ;
  Ann., N.Y. Acad. Sci . 407 ( 1983 ); 448-450.

3 Williams, G.M.  Classification of genotoxic and epigenetic
  hepatocarcinogens using liver culture assays.  Ann. N.Y. Acad.
  Sci. -349(1980) ; 272-282.

4 Williams, G.M.  Genotoxic and epigenetic  carcinogens:   Their
  identification  and significance, Ann. , N.Y. Acad. Sci_  407(l9bJ).
  328-333.

5 Weisburger, J.H; Williams, G.M.  Bioassay of  carcinogens:   In
  vitro and in  vivo  in Chemical Carcinogens, Vol.  2,  Univ.  of
  Bl^mTngham7~uirA₯. Chem. Soc. Monograph  192 (1984)  pp  1323-1373.
                                B-14

-------


















































»J

H
£
EH

2EI

EH
CO









B
(J)
e
e
o
0





o
•H
4J
CO IB
EH 3
rH
(8

H




V
, 01
E- >.

>,








c
o>
IH
O
01

^
HI
>
3
co
01
XI
3
a
0>
o
o
IB
B
°





2
4J
IB
cn
oi
z
B
r-f
IB

JJ
01 ^^
m
(0 CO
>, cn
-H TT
Ll —
o
X


cn
o to
4-> 1
r- +•

o"
•• O
wlo

=1








c
01
01

u
01

^,
01
>
3
CO
01
3
(8
JJ
CU
§
IB
B
D





g
•H
OJ
cn
z
^
,-H
IB

JJ
D ~

4J CO
01 cn
XI .-
O —

0.

,
O
o
o
0*
— cn
i co
•- i


X




JJ
IB


E d)
(11 01
Q) O
tl "O
O
01 ai
B
>i 0
(U

Ll fH
3 B
CO O
11
XI
as
4-1
8-
§

B
D





>
•H
JJ
(8
en
01
z
rH
IB

JJ
dl
^^
3 vO
w r~
nj cn

•iH ^*
_f*
CO



o
01 >,
'O C
^~ o
o
 B
•H O

•H >,
01 r-t
O B
CU O
01
.*
(0
3
i-H
O
B
O
O
E
H
rH >1
10 rH
0 O E
o «- o cn
E > CO
•H -H 4J cn i
D1 IB CO
01 01 +01
> co >
'H •* a\ •. -H
4J 0 < rH 4J
•H 0 EH 6 IB
O < E Cn 01
ft. EH -H 3 Z
E
O
•H
JJ
(B
(8
Oj
01
Li
a.
rH
IB
•H
O


g
8
o
01
XI
2
81
8
IB
B
a





g
4J
IB
cn
0)
Z
^
IB

4-1
01
f~.
01 .
E rH .,* IB
O "8 ,E 01
._i .-, a si
•C 4J 3! Ll >J<




•o
01
4J
IB
JJ
0!
B
3

4J
(B

•a
ai 01
JJ 01
01 01
0) O
4J -0



















JJ
18
•ei
01
jj

O 01
§•8
t< -a

o cy
> E
•H O
4J
•H >1
8-3
CU O
01
•H
III
3
rH
O
§
O
B
w



C
•H
JJ
0) (8
4J m en
•H in 3
8 < o
0. EH r-















jj
o >
•o
01 01 cn
0) JJ co
§18
4-> 1
Q 01 \


>,
rH
0-0
E •—
•a co
W 01 i-
O 4J
01 IB E
O 4J IH
Q 01 O
— o


x|
s
o
•H
JJ
IB -a
14 01
IB JJ
a, IB
01 4J

01 3
rH
(B 4J
•H IB
0
Ll 13 •
• 01 01 01

E 01 01
O 01 O
O 4J -o
01
rH
XI

&
0
o
18
B
a





§1
•H
4J
(B
en
01
z













+
>,
= 4J ^ C
rH O -O O
IB C 01
•-J 4J CO
O 01 Ll r-
Ll 01 O
01 01 CH B
e o 01 LI
E a LI c
O •" O
o


0)
rH
XI
3
s-
o
o






01
•H
4J
IB









0) O
0} *iH
O X
•o o

o'&
o
Cn o 01
0) •- 18
z ^ s
-a
B
IB

J^
o
•r-i
•H
a

E
(B


^
<

0)
E
0
01

^»

u
X









01
•a

o
o

^^

al r-
•D cn

E —
IB

Cn
3|cn
CO
o
O 01
O 01
Q
•a e
c
IB 1

•- •(-










•c
3
JJ
co

4J 31
(fl
o
EH


Ll
01
>
K
tl
1'
JJ
o
IB
XI
>
JJ

^;

w
col i
~
"*

 ,l
51
                                  B-15

-------
               o
                       o <
o
                       Ql M  0)
                       u o ci
                                                                                              CH
            ce  a
                       o a)
                        IB o o
                                OCA

                                •O  O  3

                                C -H r-(

                                3 4J  O

                                  •H  M

                                a) >o  c
                                Z   4J
                                                 JJ O  - .C
                                                 o en  - 10
                                                                   i|
                                                                         = 1
                                                                                       -o  c
                                                                                 T- Ol    HI

                                                                                  . 01 O  E

                                                                                 t— --- 4J  0)
                                                                                                              = 1
               al)


               U
                        O  10 t/3| E O
                                                                               0)  O
™ ^j
cl nl
                                                                                                   O  (0  -P
                                                                                                              •H  > « Q4
                                                                                                      X  0) J  0

                                                                                                      Q)  0) Ul  U

                                                                                                      co  o —  a
                                                              B-16

-------
a
EH
























































_3

M

W
6-
«C
EH
|3
































4J
C

E
e
o
cj






c
o
•H
4J
m io
E-i 3

CO
^
u




•a
0) 0!
4-1 4J
iJ iH
0 3
CM 01
01 01
OS OS



c
o
• r-4
4-1

4J
•H
U


u
O 01
C O1
—• o c
Oi — 1 10

\1 10
01 IH —
E 4J E
— C Cu
v a.
CJ 0 -
a c 01
O 0 3
Q U —


\ e
01 11
04 4J
>, in

CO

13 4J
3 01
4J CJ)
CO EH


^
O 1-
•-> o

o 3
C rJ
O (0
0 0











1
1
1








01
iH
XI
10
4J
04
01
0
o
"*



4->
CO

01

•H
CO
DI
01
z
1— 1
CO
4J
01

•o
l-H
o
c

•*



f — ,
m
(•-»
.,
Lfl
CN
ft]
X
X

*—*
o
in
3
O
g


4J
C
01
•o
o
o:
1
— o













_
^)
C^
CO t!
C E
O .-0
.-, Q
4-1 	













1
1
1








01
rH
10

Qi
0>
0
o
<
o
4J

a,
3 01
in
01 O

•H
4J 0
(0 —1
DI X
0) O
Z 4->
10
4-1
01

C CN
•.-4 r-
0) Ol
4J ,-
in —

Cd


00 — •
• XI O

x *~
i— — 73
^ C
'— CN CO
CO iH
>- T3 in CO
C X U
co in o
i'l


































1
1
1








0)
1-1
CO
4J
Oi

o
o

o


Qj
3 0)


> T3
• H
4J CJ
10 -H
Oi X
01 O
Z 4J











c
10 -~

1,0 •—
X rH
,- . 10

~ . o
10 -H
- CD
O X
•• n m
u
X























o
(0

4J
JS
Ifl

c
(O

01
CO

•o
0>
4J
i-) •
a^,
(-H
0) C
OS 0
01

•H
01
3
rH
O
c
o
o
c
iH


in
O 01
U-l C
•a o
01 01 -H
> 01 4J
•H (0 Qi
4-1 01 IJ
•H ^4 O
01 O 01
O C 01
CU -H X4
f
cfl


O ro

>i Ol
01 ^~
ij — '
01
0
1
V4 10
01 M
> 01
m o c
01

c c
Ifl -H CI 01
T3 01 C
,- 01 V4 0
01 .C -H
y-i 4-» 4J
i'l























4-1
o
CO

4J
JS
CO

c
CO

01
CO

•a
0)

M *
o >,
Pi r— 1
01 C
OS O
01

.H
0)
3
r-4
O
S
0
CJ
c
tH
s
i in
XI -H
V4 Ifl 01
0=0
UH 4-1
T3 -H
0) 01 S
> 01
•H CO rH
4-> 01 10
01 U M
O C O
Qj -H C











CN
Cl4

- C
m -H

*O Oi
C c n
CO -H fc,
•a
>- 01 T5
01 C
UJ CO
i'i
c
•H

01
S 0
o --^
.W 4J
Ij 01
CO C
E 01

01 O 01
C 4J O
m O"'E=










D> •
C 113
•H 1 01
M -H -a
i* o" IH
CO tH O
01 O C
4J -H

4-1 O 01
CO 4J
•H •> O
^4 01 01
frg-a
>J -H 01
a< c

CO U CO
C 01 .H
M 4-> CJ
01

•H
01
3
iH
O
C
0
o
c



=
4-1 O
co m
a

^
•H H-l
4J 0
in *>
O ^1-
04 =


c
CO ~
>i VO

co cn

^4 "— *

S



Oi
CM .
in .H
0
o =
O Di
= \
Ol
E
i'l































c
01
01
Jj
o
01
^
01

^
3
CO
01
rH
XI
10
4-1
04
01
o
o
cfl
c
D



C
•H 01
4-1
01 01
> 01
•H 4J
4-1
CO 4-1
DI O
01 Q4
Z 01
rH
Ifl
4J
01

3 ^O
01 r-
(0 CTl
V4 ^
•H 1vr

CO



^
0
in >,
•H iH
•a c
CM CTl
co
i
i'l


rH -^
CO • 0
•H c ml 01
4J .H — >H
c
01 >, CO 01
it 4J .H .H
01 -H >J rH
UJ O 01 -rH
14-1 -H 4J 4J
U-t X O XI
•H O Cfl 3
Q 4J XI 01
V.
o<
DI
Ifl 1-4
E -H
co ifl
Q 04
01
< cs
z
Q








2
01
U

•J
01
^
u

^
3
CO
01
rH

S
*^.
u
o
o
CO
c

0)
c
o

4J 13
CO 01
4-1
01 01

H 4J
4->
(0 01
Di 01
01 O
Z 13
^
H
X

C CO

U-l Ol
U-4 T—
i-4 *^

U



g
^s^
D!
3 1

O

=C|
1 0
01 14
CO tH
rH *-^
04 *-  01 1-1 O lH
01 Ji 01 ^ O
CO 4J CJ
<: o> o IQ
Z >H CO -H •
Q XI XI E Id


































































































                                    B-17

-------
       ca  <8
           w
       a
           o
C.  Q  C)  —
                     0>
                                      o<
                                   (8 4J
                                   18 •-!  bl
                                                 03  -»  O  6
                                              , --  .rf  jj  -a o
                                              i'l
                                                                  a,
— I
                                                                            >  c
                                                                            O  01
                                                                            'O  111
                                                                            Q< IM
                                                                         a)  in  >,
                                                                                       I   0)
                                                                                       o  in
                                                                                   01 -P  O
                                                                                   •P  Q) •<
                                                  3   C  4J
                                              •O  —   nj  ,H
                                               3  •-•  10  C
                                                                                               •H  d
                      o  -e  5)
                     u  - — c
                                                                           C  -O     -^
                                                                          a  o  3  >
                                                         I   V  3 XI  O
                                                         o  o  e -H  ij
                                                        S  15  0)  O      -El
                                                         IB  I*  O  -H  C  J 2i
                                                        4J  Q)  i   *J  O  2 M
                                                       ,  a)  a  o  m —i  < o
                                                        E  O  4J  O  4->  — ==
                      s  s. o
                                                                                                0   O
                                                                                                X   0)
                                                                                                •U   E

-------
APPENDIX  I
   B-19

-------
           UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                        WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                                                         OFFICE OF
                                                  PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:  Chlordane/Heptachlor Mutagenicity

FROM:     Irving Mauer, Ph.D., Geneticist
          Toxicology Branch
          Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)
TO:
THRU:
Henry Spencer, Ph.D., Pharmacologist
Section 7, Toxicology Branch
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)

Jane E. Harris, Ph.D.
Section Head, Toxicology Branch
Hazard Evaluation Division (TS-769C)
     This is in response to your request for an expeditious
appraisal of the positive mutagenicity studies for chlordane
and heptachlor/heptachlor epoxide, as reported in the GAG
document ("Carcinogenicity Risk Assessment  for Chlordane and
Heptachlor/Heptachlor Epoxide").  The negative reports  listed
in that document were also scanned.

     Based upon recent Velsicol submissions (Accession  Nos.
254320 and 254324) and other  information available to me  (NTP,
EMIC), two general conclusions are warranted  from this  preliminary
assessment (see below for a summary  of available data):

     1.  Although the adequacy of  the data  base  as reported
         could not be undertaken  (e.g.,  DER's) because  of  the
         timely response requested,  it appears  that  all the
         genetic end-points we require  to  be  assayed (gene
         mutation, chromosomal aberrations, DNA  damage/repair)
         have been addressed.
                              B-20

-------
     2.  Consistent with the results of mutagenicity testing
         previously reported for other agents of this chemical
         class (organochlorines such as Lindane, chloroform,
         inter alia), the mutagenic potential of these chemicals
         are low to unsubstantial.  Hence, from the available
         data it would appear their oncogenic potential derives
         from mechanisms other than "genetic initiation" (direct
         interaction with DNA).  [There is suggestive evidence
         in mammalian systems (the few promotion assays available)
         of an "epigenetic" mode of action for these chemicals.]

Survey of Available Literature
     1.
 Chlordane-technical (but not reagent-grade  alpha-
 chlordane,  gamma-chlordane,  and gamma-chlordene) was"
 positive  in adequate  bacterial  (Ames)  assays  (three
 positive,  one negative), but consistently so  only  in
 the  most  sensitive  strain (TA-100),  and only  at very
 high concentrations (5000 ug_/plate and above).  Testing
 for  mutagenicity in mammalian cells in culture  (four
 reports)  revealed inconsistent  results (two positive,
 two  negative),  due  in part to the different test systems
 employed.   The.two  negatives were reported  for  HGPRT
 in ARL  (adult rat liver) and for both  thioguanine  and
 diphtheria-toxin resistance  in  V79 (Chinese hamster
 lung) cells.   One of  the positives was for  ouabain
 resistance  in V79 cells,  but reported  for only  a single
 concentration of an unstated formulation, at  less,  than
 50 percent  cell  survival;  the second was found  in  non-
 activated mouse  lymphoma cells  (L5178Y-TK.) , but the
 study is  incomplete since  metabolic activation  was not
 employed.

 The  plant systems may activate  chlordane to mutagenic
 derivatives  is  suggested by  a single article  reporting
 both gene conversion  in  Saccharomyces  cerevisiae D4
 cultures exposed to a reagent grade (presumably alpha-
 chlordane according to the CAS  Number  stated),  and
 reversion to  wild type in  pollen  grains from  the
 homozygous  "waxy" strain W22 of  Zea  mays (corn) exposed
 to a  "commercial-grade formulation."  However,  too few
 procedural details  were  reported  to adequately  interpret
 these results.

Although reportedly negative for  gross chromosomal
 damage in vivo  (two mouse  DLT' s)  and ir± v i t rg (CHO
 cells),  technical chlordane  or  one of  its principal
 components  (alpha-chlordane) apparently has DNA-
damaging activity,  as  revealed  in a  single  study
 reporting increased dose-dependent sister-chromatid
exchanges (SCE)  in  intestinal cells  sampled from
                              B-21

-------
    exposed central mudminnows  (Umbra  limi)/  as well  as
    in CHO cells in culture and in a human  lymphoid cell
    line (one report each).   Whereas the  positive  SCE in
    fish was recorded at nonlethal concentrations  (added
    to aquarium water),  both in vitro  studies were only
    marginally positive  (less than twofold  above  controls)
    at toxic concentrations.  Only one of the four studies
    assaying for unscheduled DNA synthesis  (UDS)  in vitro
    was positive (in VA-4 cells, an SV-transformed human
    cell line), but only in the absence of  metabolic
    activation (negative with MA).  Technical chlordane
    was negative for UDS in primary hepatocyte cultures
    from rats, mice, and hamsters (two reports)  as well
    as in a human fibroblast cell line (D-550).   Finally,
    gene conversion was  reported in yeast cells
    (S. cerevisiae D4) exposed to an activation system
    (negative without),  but too few data are included in
    the article to properly interpret the results.

2.   Heptachlor/Heptachlor Epoxide.  In contrast to the
    positive results for (gene) mutagenicity reported for
    chlordane  (both technical and reagent grades), the
    available data for heptachlor and its epoxide is
    consistently negative (three Ames and/or E_.  coli, one
    IB. subtilis rec assay,  1 ARL-HGPRT,  two  Drosophila
    SLRL, 1 HPC/UDS).  Reversions to histidine prototrophy
    in Salmonella TA-1535 and  100 under  activation conditions
    to an unstated dose range, as well as to the wild-type
    (nonwaxy) phenotype  in  corn  pollen grains were reported
    by the same investigator who  found "commercial"  chlordane
    positive.

    Adequate reports on dominant-lethal  assays in mice
    were negative, but an abstract  from  a meeting reported
    positive results for both  germinal  (DLT)  and  somatic
    (bone marrow) chromosome damage in  rats  fed  1 and 5
    ppm of an unstated formulation  of heptachlor  for
    three generations.   A Russian study  also reported
    positive chromosome  damage  in bone marrow cells  from
    "white male mice" treated  i.p.  with  "heptachlor"
    (also of unstated source and purity) at  a single dose
    level stated  to  be  "4%  of  the LD50."  Too few procedural
    details  are included in these "positive" studies to
    interpret  the  results  reported.

    As with  chlordane,  negative UDS results  have been
    reported for  heptachlor technical in primary rodent
    hepatocytes  (two reports), but a  positive recorded  in
    VA-4 cells  (virus-transformed human fibroblasts) for
    both the  technical  and  epoxide, but only with metabolic
                        B-22

-------
          activation  (in  contrast  to  chlordane, positive only
          in  the  absence  of activation).   [The mutagenicity
          data  base for heptachlor epoxide  is less than adequate
          to  satisfy  FIFRA guidelines.]

 Discussion

     Recent  studies  have suggested that organochlorines
 (Lindane, chlordane, heptachlor,  inter alia) do not interact
 directly  with  DNA (i.e., are not  "genotoxic"), but rather act
 "epigenetically" by  mechanisms affecting cell membrane
 permeability and/or  following an  irreversible "initiating
 event"  (i.e.,  are "promoters" ensuring survival of preexisting
 transformed cells).  The following citations employing chlordane
 heptachlor available for this "quick-and-dirty" review (and
 listed  in the  CAG document) are consistent with this suggestion:
     1.
Inhibition of metabolic cooperation in miked cultures
consisting of thioguanine-resistant and TG-sensitive
         cells (several reports  from both Williams'
         labs).
                                           and Trosko's
     2.
     3.
The putative positive UDS results in cells already
"initiated" (e.g., the SV-40 transformed cell line,
VA-4).

Inhibition of DNA synthesis and/or cell cycle mechanisms
by severely toxic concentrations leading to .perturbation
of repair (increased UDS, SCE).
cc:  Dr. Amy Rispin
     Science Intergration Staff
     Hazard Evaluation Division  (TS-769C)
                              B-23

-------
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF REPORTED POSITIVE STUDIES
Compound
CHUHOANE








Test
Material
Technical
Technical
Technical
Reagent
(alpha)
"Cctimerclal"
(Unstated)
(Unstated)
Technical
Reagent
(alpha)
(Unstated)
Reagent
(gamma)
Reagent
(alpha)
Reagent
Assay
Gene Mutation
Gene Mutation
Gene Mutation
Gene Mutation
Gene Mutation
Ouabaln
resist.
Gene Mutation
In vivo SCE

In vitro SCE

In vitro UOS
Cell cycle
Inhlb.
In vitro CA/
SCE
[Gene Mutation
Test
System
Ames (all)
Ames (all)
Ames (TA 98,
100)
Sacch. - 04
Z. mays
Po 1 1 en
V79 cells
ARL/HGPRT
Mudmlnnow
LAZ-007 eel Is
VA-4 ce M s
L5178Y cells
CHO eel Is
1 L5178Y/TK
Dose/Cone.
Range
Reference | Evaluation
1
20- 1 00 | S 1 mmon et al. | ACCEPT.
(77)
Comments
POS. only In TA 100
a) 10-5000 | Simmon and ACCEPT. |a> EQUIV In TA 98
b) 1000-50, OOOJ Tanaka (77) |b> POS. In TA 100
5-10,000
(Unstated)
(Unstated)
(Only 1 dose
reported )
10"3-10"6 M
-12 -9
5.4/10 -10
10"6-10"3 M
Maruyama (80) ACCEPT. |POS. In TA 100; NEG.
| In TA 98
i
|Gentl le et al.
(82)
1
| Ibid
1
1
| Ahmed et al.
| (77b)
|Telang et al .
I (82)
1
Ivigfusson et al .
| (83)
|Sobtl et al.
| (83)
I
1 , 10 , 100 , 1 000 | Ahmed jt al.
uM | (77a)
I
4_ug/ml [Brubaker et al.
| (70)
1
(Unstated)
(Multiple)
|NTP (85)
1
1
INTP (85)
INCONCL.
INCONCL.
1 NCONCL.
ACCEPT.
ACCEPT.
INCONCL.
ACCEPT.
INCONCL.
INCONCL.
INCONCL.
POS. only + S9; too
few data
1
[Tech not tested; too
| few data
1
|"Weak» at < 50)5
| survival; few data
I
1
INEG. for HGPRT, but
j POS. for promotion
loose-dependent POS.
< 2-fold Increase;
no dose response
POS. only without S9
NEG. for DNA, POS. for
G2 arrest; only 1 dose
|NEG. for CA; POS. tor
SCE
1
(Not tested with S9
                      B-24

-------
PRELIMINARY  EVALUATION OF REPORTED POSITIVE STUDIES (cont'd)
Compound
HEPTACHLOR








1
1

1
Test
Material
| Technical

(Unstated)

(Unstated)

Epoxlde

(Unstated)

Assay
[Gene Mutation

Gene Mutation

in vitro UDS

In vitro UOS

in vivo CA

(Unstated) JDLT/BM-CA

Tecnnica 1
1
1

in vitro CA/
SCE

Test
System
| Ames (all)

ARL/HGPRT

VA-4 eel Is

VA-4 eel Is

Mouse BM

Rat rep ro.
study
CHO eel Is


Dose/Cone.
Range
(Unstated)

10~7 to 10~4 M

100,1000 uM

10,100,1000 uM

5 mg/kg

1 , 5 ppm

(Multiple)


1 TB
Reference (Evaluation
Genti le et al .
(82)
Telang et a 1 .
(82)
Ahmed et a 1 .
aiat
ibid.

Markarjan (66)

Cerey <74)

NTP (85)


INCONCL.

ACCEPT.

1 NCONCL

INCONCL.

1 NCONCL

INCONCL.

1 NCONCL .


Comments "'-
POS. In TA 1535/100,
Out only witn S9
NEG. for HGPRT; POS.
for promotion

no va 1 ues for UDS
POS. only with S9 Out
no values for UOS

detai Is; 1 dose
[Abstract!

POS for both CA and
SCe, but too few
detai 1 s aval labl e
                        B-25

-------
APPENDIX II
    B-26

-------
                             REFERENCES

     ™*F;E"" Hartf R'W-; Lewis' N-J-  d977)  Pesticide induced
     DNA damage and its repair in cultured human cells.   Mutation
     Res. 42:161-174.

 Arnold, D.W. ; Kennedy, G.L.; Keplinger,  M.L.; Calandra, J.C.;
     Calo, C.J.  (1977)  Dominant lethal studies with technical
     chlordane, HCS-3260, and heptachlor:  heptachlor epoxide.   J.
     Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 2:547-555.

 Benes, V.;  Sram,  R.  (1969)  Mutagenic activity of some pesticides
     in Drosophila melanogaster.  Indust. Med. 38:442-444.

 Cerey, K.;  Izakovic,  V.; Ruttkay-Nedecka, J.  (1973)  Effect  of
     heptachlor on dominant lethality and bone marrow in rats
     (Abstract No.  10).   Mutation Res.  21:26.

 Epstein,  S.S.; Arnold,  E.; Andrea,  J.; Bass, W.; Bishop, Y.
     (1972)   Detection of chemical mutagens by the dominant lethal
     assay  in the  mouse.   Toxicol. Appl.  Pharmacol. 23:288-325.

 Gentile, J.M.;  Gentile,  G.J.;  Bultman, J.; Sechriest,  R.;  Wagner,
     E.D.; Plewa,  M.J.  (1982)   An evaluation of the genotoxic
     properties of  insecticides following plant and animal
     activation.   Mutation  Res. 101:19-29.

 Glatt,  H.;  Jung,  R.;  Oesch, F.  (1983)  Bacterial mutagenicity
     investigation  of  epoxides:  drugs, drug metabolites, steroids,
     and pesticides.   Mutation  Res.  11:99-118.

 Griffin III,  D.E.,;  Hill,  W.E.  (1978)  In vitro breakage  of
     plasmid  DNA by  mutagens and pesticides.   Mutation  Res.
     52:161-169.

 Markaryan,  D.S.   (1966)  Cytogenetic effect of some chlororganic
     insecticides on mouse  bone marrow  cell nuclei.  Genetika
    .2:132-137.

 Marshall, T.C.; Dorough, H.W.;  Swim, H.E.  (1976)  Screening  of
    pesticides  for  mutagenic potential using Salmonella typhimurium
    mutants.  J. Agric.  Food Chem.  24:560-563.

 Maslansky, C.J.; Williams,  G.M.   (1981)   Evidence for  an epigenetic
    mode of action  in organochlorine pesticide hepatocarcinogenicity:
    A  lack of genotoxicity  in  rat,  mouse, and hamster  hepatocytes.
    J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth.  8_:l21-130.

Moriya, M.;  Ohta, T.; Watanabe,  K.;  Miyazawa, T.; Kato, K.;
    Shirasu, Y.  (1983)  Further  mutagenicity studies  on pesticides
    in bacterial reversion  assay  systems.  Mutation Res. 16:185-216.

                               B-27

-------
National Toxicology Program  (1983)  NTP mutagenesis  (Salmonella
    typhimurium) test results:  Heptachlor  (No.  59).   NTP  Bulletin
    No. 9 (April 1983), p. 6  (Table 3).

Probst, G.S.; McMahon, R.E.;  Hill, L.E.; Thompson, C.Z.; Epp,
    J.K.; Neal, S.B.  (1981)  Chemically-induced  unscheduled  DNA
    synthesis in primary  rat  hepatocyte cultures:  A comparison
    with bacterial mutagenicity using  218 compounds.   Environ.
    Mutag. 3:11-32.

Seiler, J.P.  (1977)  Inhibition of testicular  DNA synthesis  by
    chemical mutagens and carcinogens:  Preliminary  results in
    the validation of a novel short-term test.   Mutation Res.
    46:305-310.

Shirasu, Y.M.; Moriya, K.  Kato, Furuhashi,  A.;  Kada, T.   (1976)
    Mutagenicity screening of pesticides  in the microbial  system.
    Mutation Res. 40:19-30.

Telang, S.; Tong, C.; Williams, G.M.   (1982)   Epigenetic  membrane
    effects of a possible tumor promoting  type on cultured liver
    cells by the nongenotoxic organochlorine pesticides chlordane
    and heptachlor.  Carcinogenesis  3:1175-1178.

Van Dijck, P.; Van de Voorde, H.   (1976)   Mutagenicity versus
    carcinogenicity  of organochlorine insecticides.   Meded. Fak.
    Landbouwwet. R.U. Gent.  41:1491-1498.
                                B-28   *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFF ICEj-1987 -748-121 <40727

-------

-------
   CO
   - c
                                                                            .E
O T3
UJ T3

X W
(J 0)




Is
Q. c
0) t
                                                           1"
                                                           s s ^
                                                           (U O Q)
                                                                     » U ^   3 O £


                                                                     : •§ j;   a: -S 3
                                                                                   o
                                                                                   CD
                                                                                  co
                                                                                  o
                                                                                  o
                                                                                  to
                                                                                  Q-

                                                                                  UJ
               8
a"
m



0)
              o ffl

             *S m

             OrS

-------