EPA/600/9-87/015
                                                 July  1987
       LAND  DISPOSAL,  REMEDIAL  ACTION,  INCINERATION
             AND  TREATMENT  OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
  Proceedings  of the Thirteenth Annual  Research Symposium
            at Cincinnati,  Ohio, May 6-8,  1987
Sponsored by the U.S*.  EPA,  Office of Research & Development
      Hazardous Waste  Engineering Research Laboratory
   '  x             Cincinnati, OH  45268
                     Edison, NJ  08837
                      Coordinated by:

                        JACA Corp;
                Fort Washington, PA  19034
                  Contract No. 68-03-3258
                     Project Officers:
                     Naomi P. Berkley
                      John F. Martin
                   Cincinnati, OH  45268
       HAZARDOUS WASTE ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY
            OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
           U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    %             CINCINNATI, OH  45268

-------
                                  NOTICE
      These Proceedings have been reviewed in accordance with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's peer and administrative review policies
and approved for presentation and publication.  Mention of trade names or
commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for
use.
                                     -IT-

-------
                                 FOREWORD
      As hazardous waste continues to be one of the more prominent
environmental concerns to the people of the United States and other
countries throughout the world, there are continuing needs for research to
characterize problems, and develop and evaluate alternatives to addressing
those problems.  The programs of the Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory (HWERL) are designed to contribute to satisfying these research
needs.

      These Proceedings from the 1987 Symposium provide the results of
projects recently completed by HWERL and current information on other
projects presently underway.  Those wishing additional information on these
projects are urged to contact the author or the EPA Project Officer.
                                       Thomas R. Hauser, Director
                                       Hazardous Waste Engineering
                                       Research Laboratory
                                     -m-

-------
                                 ABSTRACT
      The Thirteenth Annual Research Symposium on Land Disposal, Remedial
Action, Incineration and Treatment of Hazardous Waste was held in
Cincinnati, Ohio, May 6 through May 8, 1987.  The purpose of this Symposium
was to present the latest significant research findings of ongoing and
recently completed projects funded by the Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory (HWERL) to persons concerned with hazardous waste mana-
gement.

      These Proceedings are for Session A, Hazardous Waste Land Disposal;
Session B, Hazardous Waste Incineration and Treatment; and Session C, HWERL
Posters.  Papers presented by Symposium speakers and poster presentation
abstracts are compiled.  Land disposal subjects discussed include remedial
action treatment and control technologies for soil and water, landfill
liner and cover systems, geotechnical aspects of earthen barriers, leachate
composition and migration, underground storage tanks and emergency
response.  Incineration and treatment subjects include thermal destruction
of hazardous wastes, field evaluations of treatment methods, control  of
volatile emissions, waste minimization and emerging physical, chemical and
biological processes for hazardous waste destruction.
                                     -iv-

-------
                                  CONTENTS
              SESSION A - HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND DISPOSAL PAPERS
Technical Resource Documents and Technical  Handbooks for Hazardous
Wastes Management
  Norbert B. Schomaker, U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency 	     1

Implications of Current Soil Liner Permeability Research Results
  Walter E. Grube, Jr., U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency .....     9

The Behavior and Assimilation of Organic and Inorganic Priority
Pollutants Codisposed with Municipal Refuse - A Progress Report
  Frederick G. Pohland, Georgia Institute of Technology	    26

Field Verification of FMLS — Assessment of an Uncovered
Unreinforced 60-mil EPDM Liner after 18 Years of Exposure
  Henry E. Haxo, Jr., Matrecon, Inc	    38

Geosynthic Design Considerations for Double Liner Systems
  Gregory N. Richardson, Soil & Material Engineers, Inc	    51

Inspection Procedures/Criteria for Installation of Flexible
Membrane Liners
  William M. Hel-d^SCS Engineers	...... .  .    59

An Assessment of Materials that Interfere with
Stabilisation/Solidification Processes
  R. Mark Bricka, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment
  Station.	    64

Mine ,Waste/Overburden Analytical Techniques - Characterization
and Simulation  of Mine Tailings Weathering Environments
  Frank  T.  Caruccio, University of South Carolina  .  	    72

The (Effects of  Overburden Pressure and  Hydraulic Gradient on the
Performance of  Model Soil-Bentonite Slurry Cutoff Walls
  Richard M. McCandless, University of  Cincinnati.	  .    80
    i                           •  •    -            • '   ' '   .         -
Expert Systems  to Assist in Decisions Concerning Land Disposal
of ^azardous Wastes
  Daniel G. Greathouse, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 	    89

Modeling Soil Water  Movement in Minimum Technology  Waste
Management  Facilities
  Dfavid  H.  Gancarz,  Radian  Corporation	    97

Remediation of  an  Industrial Dump Site  - A Case  History, Part  II
  David  S.  Kosson,  Rutgers University	    105
                                      -v-

-------
                                                                         age
                            SESSION A  (Continued)
Capillarity and Anlsotropy  Effects  on Ground-Water Flow to
Excavation
  Forest 0. Mlxon,  Research Triangle Institute  	 	   113
Pathways for  the  Removal  of Volatile Organics from Surface
Impoundments
  Crowley Clark Allen,  Research Triangle  Institute 	   121
Composition of Leachates  from Actual Hazardous  Waste Sites
  Glenn D. McNabb,  Science  Applications International Corp.  	   130
Decontamination Techniques  for Mobile Response  Equipment Used at
Waste Sites
  Mary K. Stlnson,  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency	   139
Leak Prevention in  Underground Storage Tanks:   A State-of-the-art
Survey
  A.C. Gangadharan, Enviresponse, Inc	   149
A Preliminary Analysis  of Underground Tanks Used for CERCLA
Chemical Storage
  Ihor Lysyj, Environmental Monitoring and Services, Inc	   156
U.S. EPA Evaluation of  Volumetric UST Leak Detection Methods
  James W. Starr, Enviresponse, Inc	   164
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study on  Demonstration of Remedial Action
Technologies  for  Contaminated Land and Groundwater
  Donald E. Sanning, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency	 . .   172
Reactivity of Various Grouts to Hazardous Wastes and Leachates
  Andrew Bodocsl, University of Cincinnati 	   184
                                            i
Electro-Decontamination of  Chrome-Contaminated Soils
  Sunlrmal Banerjee, University of Washington.  .....  	   193
Current Status of the Designation' and Adjustment of CERCLA
Hazardous Substances and  their Associated Reportable Quantities
  K. Jack Kooyoomjian, U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency	   201
The EPA Personnel  Protection Technology Research Program
  Michael D. Royer, U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency	   210
Application Opportunities for Canine Olfaction:   Equipment
Decontamination and Leaking Tanks •
  Herbert S. Skovronek, New Jersey Institute of Technology 	   217
Nondestructive Testing for  Location of Containers Buried in
Soil
  Robert M. Koerner, Drexel University 	   224
                                      -vi-

-------
       SESSION B - HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATION AND TREATMENT PAPERS
                                                                        Page
Thermodynamic Analysis of Post-Flame Reactions Applied to Waste
Combustion
  Daniel P.Y. Chang, University of California, Davis .........   235

Influence of Atomization Parameters on Droplet Stream Trajectory
and Incineration
  James A. Mulholland, U.S. Environmental.Protection Agency. .....   246

Distribution of Volatile Trace Elements in Emissions and Residuals
from Pilot-Scale Liquid Injection Incineration
  Johannes W. Lee, Acurex Corporation	   254

Assessment of Residues from Incineration of RCRA Wastes
  Joan  V. Boegel, Metcalf & Eddy* Inc. .	   262

Waste Characterization and the Generation of Transient Puffs in a
Rotary  Kiln  Incinerator Simulator
  William P. Linak, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency .......   283

On-Line Monitoring of Organic Emissions with a Mobile Laboratory
  Sharon L.  Nolen, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. .  	   297

Total Mass  Emissions from a Hazardous Waste Incinerator
  Andrew R.  Trenholm, Midwest Research Institute ...........   304

Incineration of Cleanup Residues from the Bridgeport Rental and
Oil Services Superfund Site
  Larry W.  Waterland, Acurex Corporation .  .	 	,.   318

Pilot-Scale  Testing of Nonsteady Boiler Waste Cofiring
  Howard B.  Mason, Acurex Corporation.	   326

Technical/Economic Assessment of Selected PCB Decontamination
Processes
  Ben H. Carpenter, Research Triangle Institute. . '	   332

Mobile  KPEG Destruction Unit for PCBs, Dioxins and  Furans  in
Contaminated Waste
  Charles  J. Rogers,  U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency	   361
 Supercritical  Solvent Extraction
   Charles A.  Eckert,  University of Illinois.
366
 Supercritical  Fluid Extraction from Catalytic Oxidation  of Toxic
 Organics from Soils
   F. Carl  Knopf, Louisiana State University	    373

 Microbial  Degradation of Synthetic Chlorinated Compounds
   Richard A. Haugland, University of Illinois at Chicago 	    388
                                      -vri-

-------
                           SESSION B  (Continued)
Bacterial Oxidation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
  Louis M. Nadim, The University of Texas at Austin	   395
Engineering P450 Genes in Yeast
  John C. Loper, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine	   403
Blodegradation of Organopollutants by Phanerochaete Chrysbsporium:
Practical Considerations
  John A. Bumpus, Michigan State University	   411
Growth of the White-Rot Fungus Ptianerochaete Chrysosporlum in Soil
  Richard T. Lamar, USDA Forest Products Laboratory	   419
Biological Treatment of Selected Aqueous Organic Hazardous Wastes
  Richard J. Lesiecki, University of Cincinnati. .... 	   425
Assessment of Alternative Technologies for Treating Spent
Electroplating Solutions and Sludges
  Catherine Drlscoll, Metcalf & Eddy, Inc	   431
Solvent Recovery Technologies
  Robert A. Olexsey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency	   444
Evaluation of Hazardous Waste Recycling Processes in the Printed
Circuit Board Industry
  Thomas J. Nunno, Alliance Technologies Corporation 	   452
The California Innovative Alternative Treatment and Recycling
Demonstration Projects Program
  Robert Ludwig, California Department of Health Services	   460
Field Assessment of Steam Stripping Volatile Organics from,
Aqueous Waste Streams
  Marvin Branscome, Research Triangle Institute	   468
Field Assessment of the Fate of Volatile Organics in Aerated
Waste Treatment Systems
  David Green, Research Triangle Institute 	   478
Pilot-Scale Evaluation of a Thin-Film Evaporator for Volatile
Organic Removal  from Land Treatment Sludges
  Coleen M. Northeim, Research Triangle Institute	   487
                                     -viii-

-------
                   SESSION C - HWERL POSTER PRESENTATIONS
EPA/DOE Hazardous Waste Control Technology Data Base
  Cathy S. Fore, DOE Hazardous Waste Remedial  Actions Program	   495

Analysis of Samples from the Gateway National  Recreation Area at
Jamaica Bay, New York
  Dave Olsen, NUS Corp./Enviresponse Inc.	   496

Case Evaluations of RD&D Permit Applications
  Wyman Clark, EER Corp	   497

Update on Status of EPA Mobile Incineration System
  A.C. Gangadharan, Enviresponse, Inc. . . .	   498

Boiler Cofiring of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
  John W. Wasser, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . >.'	   499

Demonstration, Testing and Evaluation of Commercial
Technologies under SITE Program
  Seymour Rosenthal, Enviresponse, Inc.	   500

Conditions Which Enhance Biodegradation of Organic Compounds by
White Rot Fungi
  Steven Aust, Michigan State  University 	   501

Demonstration and Evaluation of the EPA Mobile Carbon Regenerator
  Patricia M. Brown, Enviresponse, Inc	   502

Pretreatment of Land-Treated Wastes
  Thomas C. Ponder, Jr., PEI Associates, Inc.	   503

Geotechnical Analysis  for Review of Dike Stability
  Mark S. Meyers, University of Cincinnati  . . . .	   504

Land Ban Data Needs
  Ron Turner, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency	   505

Demonstration of Computer Assisted Engineering Techniques for
Remedial Action Assessment
  Phillip R. Cluxton,  University of Cincinnati 	   506

Hazardous Waste Residuals Characterization
  H.  Paul Warner, U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency  .	   507

Cost  Engineering Models  for Remedial  Response  Technologies
  Wiliam Kemner, PEI  Associates, Inc.   ;  .	   508

Trial  Burn  Measurement Guidance
  Roy Neulicht,  Midwest Research Institute  	   509
                                      -ix-

-------
                           SESSION C (Continued)
                                                                        Page
Microscopic Microchemical Anajyses of Solidified Inorganic Wastes
Containing Interference Compounds
  Harvlll C. Eaton, Louisiana State University 	 	    510
Vacuum-Assisted In-Situ Steam Stripping to Remove Pollutants from
Contaminated Soil
  Arthur E. Lord, Jr., Drexel University 	 ...........    511
Use of Modified Clays for Adsorption and Catalytic Destruction of
Contaminants
  Steven A. Boyd, Michigan State Univeristy	    512
Stringfellow Leachate Treatment with Rotating Biological
Contactor                                    ..       •  ..
  Edward Opatken, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 	  ...    513
Separation and Recovery of Hazardous Wastes
  Paul R. Anderson, IIT Research Center	    514
Treatment of Aqueous Metal and Cyanide Bearing Hazardous Wastes
  Sardar Q. Hassan, University of Cincinnati  	    515
An Experimental Investigation of Single Droplet Combustion of
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
  Nelson Sorbo, University of California, Davis	    516
Catalytic Destruction of Halogenated Hazardous Waste
  Howard Greene, University of Akron 	  .    517
Expert System Screening of Remedial Action Technologies  for
CERCLA Sites
  Lewis Rossman, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency	    518
Activities at Louslana State University's Hazardous Waste
Research Center
  Louis Thibodeaux, Louisiana State University 	    519
Partitioning of PCDDs and PCDFs in Soils Containing Wood
Preservative Fluid
  Danny Jackson, Radian Corp	    520
Technical Resource Documents
  Norman Surprenant, Alliance Technologies Corp	    521
                                      -x-

-------
                           SESSION C (Continued)
Oxidation of Persistent Aromatic Pollutants by Lignin-Degrading
Enzymes
  John Glaser, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency	   522

Laboratory Study of the Thermal Decomposition of Sulfur
Hexafluoride
  Philip H. Taylor, University of Dayton Research Institute	   523

The U.S. EPA Combustion Research Facility
  R. W. Ross, Acurex Corp.	   524

Construction, Testing, and Shakedown of an Environmental Testing
Chamber of Soil Reagent Testing
  Michael Black, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency	   525

Earthen Liners:  Prototype of a Field Study of Transit Time
  Karen A. Albrecht, Illinois State Geological Survey	   526
                                      -xi-

-------

-------
                  TECHNICAL RESOURCE DOCUMENTS AND TECHNICAL HANDBOOKS

                            FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES MANAGEMENT

                                  Norbert B. Schomaker
                                          and
                                   Daniel W. Farrell
                          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
                                        ABSTRACT
     The Environmental Protection Agency  is preparing  a series  of Technical Resource
Documents  (TRD's) and Technical Handbooks to provide best engineering control technology
to meet the needs of the  Resource Conservation  and Recovery Act (RCRA)  and the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)  respectively.
These documents  and handbooks are "basically compilation of research efforts of the Land
Pollution  Control Division (LPCD) to date. The specific areas  of research being cond-
ucted under the  RCRA land disposal  program relate to laboratory,  pilot and field valid-
ation studies  in cover systems, waste leaching  and solidification, liner systems and
disposal facility evaluation. The  specific areas of research being conducted under the
CERCLA uncontrolled waste sites  (Superfund) program relate to pilot and field validation
studies in barriers, waste storage, waste treatment, modeling and postclosure evaluation.
.The  technical  resource documents are intended to assist both  the  regulated community  and
the  permitting authorities, as well as support  the RCRA Technical Guidance Documents
prepared by EPA'"s Office  of Sol-id Waste (OSW).   The technical handbook's provide the EPA
Program Offices  and Regions, as well as the states and other  interested parties, with
the  latest information relevant to  remedial actions.
 INTRODUCTION

     Land disposal of hazardous waste is
 subject to the requirements of Subtitle C
 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
 Act (RCRA) of 1976 and to the 1984 Amend-
 ments to this Act.  This Act requires
 that the treatment, storage, or disposal
 of hazardous waste be carried out in
 accordance with RCRA regulations.  Owners
 and operators of new facilities must
 apply for and receive a RCRA permit
 before beginning operation of such a
 facility..
      The clean-up or containment tech-
 nology associated with remedial action at
 an existing uncontrolled hazardous waste
 is subject to the requirements of the
 Comprehensive Environmental Response,
 Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
 (CERCLA or Superfund).  This Act requires
, evaluation of remedial action clean up
 technologies.
      To meet the Control Technology
 aspects of RCRA and CERCLA as related
 to Land Disposal Facilities, the research
 program has relied heavily on the cont-
 ainment aspects of the wastes at the
 facility or site.  The containment
 aspects for waste disposal onto the land
 needs to address the development of
 performance and operational standards for
 new waste disposal facilities (RCRA
 sites) and the containment or destruction
 of pollutants emanating from existing
 waste disposal facilities (CERCLA sites).
 The control technology research approach
 being pursued by the USEPA is to develop
 an, improved data base so that current
 waste disposal practices can be upgraded
                                            -1-

-------
by developing  proper  site selection
criteria and control  technology for the
establishment  of  new  waste disposal
facilities, and to develop improved
containment technology for existing waste
disposal sites by minimizing pollutant
generation and release to the environment.
     The development  of proper control
technology for new (RCRA)  waste disposal
facilities will combine information from
laboratory, pilot and field validation
studies in the research areas of cover
systems, waste leaching and solid-
ification liner systems and disposal
facility evaluation.   Cover systems
research is developing and evaluating  the
effectiveness  of  various material comp-
onents  (i.e.,  vegetation,  soils,
membranes, and drainage blankets)  in
relation to the cover function of minim-
izing moisture ingress and gas egress.
Waste leaching research is investigating
techniques for predicting the composition
of actual field leachates from samples of
wastes or mixtures of wastes.   Waste
solidification research is evaluating  the
effectiveness  and performance with time
as liners to contain  and minimize the
release of-leachate and gas pollutants to
the environment.   Disposal facility
evaluation research is evaluating effect-
ive techniques to ensure that land dis-
posal facilities  are  built as designed
for either permanent  disposal or short/
long term storage.  Incorporated through-
out the research  for  development of
control technology for new waste disposal
facilities is  a continuous technology
transfer and assistance program of activ-
ity for the program office and regional
offices and user  communities.   The Tech-
nical Resource Documents (TRD's)  are
considered to  be  primary documents for
transferring current  RCRA control tech-
nologies to the user.   The TRD's are
being developed and published  to assist
the permit applicants and  permit review
officials to assure that the latest
containment facility  technology is being
utilized.  The TRD's  are to be used in
conjunction with  the  Technical Guidance
Documents being prepared by OSW.   The
documents contain guidance,  not regula-
tions or requirements which the Agency
believes comply with Design and Operating
Requirements and the Closure and Post-
Closure Requirements contained in Part
264 of the regulations.  The information
and guidance presented in these documents
constitute a suggested approach for
review and evaluation based on good
engineering practices.  There may be
alternative and equivalent methods for
conducting the review and evaluation.
However, if the results of these methods
differ from those of the Environmental
Protection Agency's method, they may have
to be validated by the applicant.
     The development of proper contain-
ment technology to upgrade existing
(CERCLA) waste disposal facilites will
combine information from the above
described program for new waste disposal
facilities along with pilot and field
validation studies in the research areas
of barriers, waste storage, waste treat-
ment, modeling, and post-closure evalua-
tion.  Barrier research is developing and
evaluating insitu control technologies to
contain or minimize pollutant releases
from uncontrolled sites and to predict
performance with time.  In-situ control
technologies such as slurry walls, grout
curtains, cutoff walls, and covers are
being evaluated.  Waste storage research
is evaluating the cost-effectiveness of
placing wastes from the clean up of
uncontrolled sites into mines or above
ground storage facilities.  Also, pack-
aging of hazardous wastes in various
containers is being investigated.  Waste
treatment research is evaluating the
effectiveness of various techniques for
treating the wastes or collected leachates
in-place or on-site.  Techniques such as
stabilization, encapsulation, permeable
treatment walls, microbial degradation,
and physical/ chemical treatment are
being investigated.  Modeling technology
has been developed for evaluation of
remedial action alternatives- and will be
updated to reflect improved performance,
reliability, and cost information from
field scale studies, case studies and
other research areas.  Post-closure
research is evaluating the criteria for
final site usage once the disposal facil-
ity has been remediated.  Incorporated
                                           -2-

-------
throughout the research for development
of control technology for existing waste
disposal facilities is a continuous
technology transfer and assistance prog-
ram of activity for the program office
and user communitiess.  The Technical
Handbooks are considered to be the primary
documents for transferring current CERCLA
containment technology to the user.
TECHNICAL RESOURCE DOCUMENTS

     Eight TRD's have been completed  to
date.  Six of the TRD's are related to
landfills, and one document each  is
related  to surface impoundments and land
treatment.  A listing of these documents
is  shown below, along with a brief
decryption, publication number, and the
project  officer's name is parentheses.

Evaluating Cover Systems for Solid and
Hazardous Waste  (SW-867)

     A critical part of the sequence  of
designing, constructing, and maintaining
an  effective cover over solid and hazard-
ous waste sites  is the evaluation of
engineering plans.  This TRD presents a
procedure for evaluating closure  covers
on  solid and hazardous wastes sites.   All
aspects  of covers are addressed  in detail
to  allow for a complete evaluation of the
entire cover system.  , There are  eleven
sequential procedures  identified for
evaluating engineering plans.
      The document describes current
technology  for  landfill covers  in three
broad areas: data examination, evaluation
steps and post-closure plan.  The data
examination  discusses test data  review
procedure, topographical data review and
climatological data review procedures.
The evaluation steps.include  cover com- .
position,  thickness,  placement,  config-
 uration, drainage  and vegetation.  The
post-closure aspects include  maintenance
 and contingency plan evaluation proced-
 ures.  There are 36 specific steps,
 regarding the preceding factors, which
 are recommended to be followed in eval-
 uating a permit for a cover for hazardous
 waste.  *055-000-00228-2 (R.E.  Landreth)
Landfill and Surface Impoundment Perform-
ance Evaluation (SW-869)

     The evaluation of leachate collection
systems using compacted clay or synthetic
liners to determine how much leachate
will be collected and how much will seep
through the liner into underlying soils
is presented.  The adequacy of sand and
gravel drain layers, slope, and pipe
spacing is also covered.  The author has
allowed for the widely varied technical
backgrounds of his intended audience by
presenting, in full, the rigorous math-.
ematics involved in reaching his final
equations.  Thus, any evaluator can take
full advantage of the manual up to the
level of his own mathematical profic-
iency.  *055-000-00233-9  (M.H. Roulier)

Lining of Waste Impoundment and Disposal
Facilities  (SW-870)

     This document provides information
on performance, selection, and install-
ation of specific liners and cover mater-
ials for specific disposal situations,
based upon  the current state-of-the-art
of  liner technology and other pertinent
technologies.  It contains descriptions
of  wastes and their effects on linings, a
full description of various natural and
artificial  liners, service life and
failure mechanisms; installation problems
and requirements of liner  types, costs of
liners and  installation,  and tests that
are necessary for pre-installation and
monitoring  surveys.   A revised version
should be available in late  1986.
*055-000-00231-2  (R.E. Landreth)

Management  of Hazardous Waste Leachate
 (SW-871)

     This document has been  prepared  to
provide guidance  for  permit  officials and
disposal site, operators on available
management  options  for controlling,
treating, and disposing of hazardous
waste  leachates.   It  discusses  consider-
ations  necessary  to develop  sound  manage-
ment plans  for  leachate generated  at  ',
 surface  impoundments  and landfills.
 Management  may  take the form of leachate
                                            -3-

-------
 collection and treatment, or pretreatment
 of the wastes.
 *055-000-00224-0 (S.C.  James)

 Guide to the Disposal of Chemically
 Stabilized and Solidified Wastes (SW-872)

      The purpose of this TRD is to prov-
 ide guidance in the use of chemical
 stabilization/solidification techniques
 for limiting hazards posed by toxic wastes
 in the environment, and to assist in the
 evaluation of permit applications related
 to this disposal technology.  The document
 addresses the treatment of hazardous waste
 for disposal or long term storage and
 surveys the current state and effective-
 ness of waste treatment technology.  A
 summary of the major physical and chemical
 properties of treated wastes is presented.
 A  listing of major  suppliers of stabiliz-
 ation and solidification technology and a
 summary of each process is included.
 *055-000-00226-6 (R.E.  Landreth)

 Closure of Hazardous Waste Surface
 Impoundments (SW-873)

      The methods, tests,  and procedures
 involved in closing a surface impoundment
 are discussed and referenced.   Problems
 related to abandoned methods such as
 waste removal,  consolidating the  waste
 on-site and securing the  site as  a land-
 fill are also discussed.   It is written
 primarily for staff members in EPA
 regional offices or state regulatory
 offices,  who are charged  with evaluating
 and  approving closure plans for surface
 impoundments under  regulations of the
 Resource  Conservation and Recovery  Act of
 1976.   Methods of assessing site  closure
 considerations are  documented.
 *055-000-00227-4 (M.H. Roulier)

Hazardous Waste Land  Treatment (SW-874)

      One  objectives of  "Hazardous Waste
 Land  Treatment"  are to describe current
 technology and  to provide methods for
evaluating  the  performance of  an  applic-
ant's hazardous waste land  treatment
 facility  design.  Land treatment  is
approached comprehensively  from initial
 site selection through final closure, and
 additional  information sources are refer-
 enced liberally.  Land treatment, which
 involves using the surface soil as the
 treatment medium, is already widely
 practiced by some industries for handling
 their hazardous wastes.
 *055-000-00232-1  (C.C. Wiles)

 FUTURE TECHNICAL RESOURCE DOCUMENTS

      Additional TRD's now being developed
 or  in planning stages by the Office of
 Research and Development are included
 here for reference.  A listing of these
 documents is shown below, along with a
 brief description and the project
 officer's name in parentheses.

 Soil Properties, Classification and
 Hydraulic Conductivity Testing

      This report is a compilation of
 available laboratory and field testing
 methods for the measurement of hydraulic
 conductivity (permeability) of soils.
 Background information on soil class-
 ification, soil water, and soil compaction
 are  included along with descriptions of
 sixteen methods for determination of
 saturated or unsaturated hydraulic cond-
 uctivity.  This TRD (SW-925)  was published
 by OSW in March 1984 for public comment.
 It is  being revised to incorporate public
 comments that were received.   A draft
 copy of this document has been sent to
 ORD  where it has been stalled, awaiting
clearance.  (G.K. Dotson)

Solid Waste Leaching Procedures Manual

     This is a report on laboratory batch
procedures for extracting or  leaching a
sample of solid waste so that the comp-
osition of the lab leachate is similar to
 the  composition of ieachate from waste
under field conditions.   This TRD "(SW-924)
was originally published by OSW in March
1984 for public comment  and has subse-
quently been revised with their incorpor-
ation.  At present,  the  draft document is
completed and awaits clearance by ORD.
 (C.I. Mashni)
                                          -4-

-------
Batch^Type Adsorption Procedures for
Estimating Soil Attenuation of Chemicals

     This TRD summarizes laboratory batch
procedures for assessing the capacity of
soils to attenuate chemical constituents
from solutions such as leachates.  It
explains the scientific basis and ration-
ale for these procedures and the use of
data in designing soil liners for pollu-
tant retention.
     It will be issued for public comment
in May 1987.  Copies will be available for
inspection at EPA Libraries in Cincinnati,
Washington D.C., Research Triangle Park,
and in all ten Regional Offices.  It may
also be purchased, on paper or microfiche,
from the NTIS as PB 87-146155.
 (M.H. Roulier)

Methods for the Prediction of Leachate
Plume Migration and Mixing

     This project has developed a variety
of computer programs for hand-held calc-
ulators, microcomputers, and macrocomp-
uters.  The programs predict leachate
plume migration from single and multiple
sources.  The document also contains
discussions of sorption, case histories
and a field study.  A draft for public
comment has been postponed until  late
1988.   (M.H. Roulier)

Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill
Performance  (HELP) Model

     The HELP Model  is a modification of
 the original waste disposal site  hydrol- '
ogic model entitled,  "Hydrologic  Simul-
ation on Solid  Waste Disposal Sites."
This update has incorporated the  two-
dimensional aspects  of  landfill cover
 systems, as well  as  the  addition  of  the
 leachate collection  system.  OSW  published
 this TRD (SW-84-009  and  SW-84-010)  for
 public  comment in two volumes.  These  two
 volumes are available from NTIS  (tPB-85-
 100-840 and  tPB-85-100-832,  respectively)
 and  include  the user's guide  for  Version
 1 and  documentation  and  description of
 the program.   The HELP Model  (Version 1)
 is also available for the IBM PC/XT or
 compatible computers.  Version 2 of the
HELP Model is being developed to incorp-
orate public comments and results from
verification studies and will be published
in late 1987.  (D.C. Ammon)

Design, Construction, Maintenance, and
Evaluation of Clay Liners for Hazardous
Waste Facilities

     This 600-page TRD summarizes the
state-of-the-art for clay liners as of
August 1985.  It was issued for public
comment in December 1986, is currently
being revised, and will be reissued for
inspection at EPA libraries in Cincinnati,
Washington D.C., Research Triangle Park,
and in all ten Regional Offices.  The
draft TRD may be purchased, on paper or
microfiche, through NTIS as PB 86-184496/
AS.   (M.H. Roulier)

TECHNICAL HANDBOOKS

     Eleven technical handbooks have been
completed to date.  These handbooks cover
a variety of techniques on general remed-
ial action guidance, in-place treatment,
barriers, decontamination and modeling.
A listing of those documents which
contain unique state-of-the-art inform-
ation is shown below, along with a brief
description, publication number, and the
project officer's name in parentheses.

Review of In-Place Treatment Techniques
for Contaminated Surface Soils

     This two-volume report presents
information on in-place treatment tech-
nologies applicable to contaminated soils
less  than 2  feet in depth.  Volume 1
discusses the selection of the appropriate
in-place treatment  technology for a
particular site and provides specific
information  on each  technology.  Volume  2
provides background  information and  -
relevant chemical data.
      Selection of in-place treatment
  technologies  follows the  process outlined
 in the  National Contingency Plan.  The
type  of in-place treatment  (extraction,
 immobilization, degradation, attenuation,
or  reduction of volatiles)  is determined
on the  basis of information available
                                             -5-

-------
 from the remedial investigation.  Select-
 ion of a specific technonlogy involves
 assessment of waste, soil, and site-spec-
 ific variables.  The technology is
 implemented if it is considered more
 cost-effective in comparison with the
 other alternatives.
 tPB 85-124881 Vol. 1 (N.P. Barkley)
 tPB 85-124889 Vol. 2 (N.P. Barkley)

 Handbook for Remedial Action at Waste
 Disposal Sites (Revised)

      The objectives of -the Handbook are
 twofold: (1) to provide the reader with a
 generalized understanding of the pollutant
 pathways involved in waste disposal sites,
 the remedial actions as they apply to
 each pathway, and the process of selecting
 the appropriate remedial actions; and
 (2) to provide detailed information on
 specific remedial actions including
 applications, state-of-the-art, design,
 construction, and/or operating consider-
 ations, advantages, disadvantages and
 cost.  EPA/625/6-85/006   (D.E. Banning)

 Handbook for Evaluating Remedial Action
 Technology Plans"

      This Remedial Action Technical
 Resource Document describes how the tech-
 nologies and methods for evaluating prop-
 oposed RCRA new hazardous waste disposal
 sites can be applied to site-specific
 remedial response activities for uncont-
 rolled hazardous waste sites.  The
, Remedial Action Document is based on the
 state-ofthe^art technical and cost
 information in eight TRD's for design and
 c-valuation of new hazardous waste disposal
 •jites under RCRA.  That information was
 reviewed for relevance to remedial resp-
 onse at uncontrolled hazardous waste
 disposal sites, and then edited to address
 the needs of personnel involved in resp-
 onse and remedial action planning-under
 CERCLA.  tPB 84-118-249 (H.R. Pahren)

 Slurry Trench Construction for Pollutant
 Migration Cbntrol

      A guidance manual for slurry trench
 cut-off wall design, construction, and
performance evaluation provides recommend
ations on a variety of scientific and
technical parameters relevant to using
this approach to isolate hazardous chem-
icals in near-surface groundwater regimes.
The accomplishment of this effort required
extensive information gathering and
integration of technical data gathered
from a diverse array of experience and
authorities.  tPB 84-177-831  (W.E. Grube)

Guide for Decontaminating Buildings,
Structures and Equipment at Superfund
Sites
     A decontamination manual was designed
for EPA Program Offices and Regional
Superfund Programs as part of the restor-
ation profile of Superfund sites.  The
manual gives guidelines on 1) the extent
to which contamination of buildings,
structures and construction equipment can
be reduced or eliminated, 2) decontamin-
ation methods, 3) economics, 4) health
hazards, and 5) availability of equipment/
personnel for the detoxification proce-
dures.  Specific waste types found in
contaminated buildings, structures and
equipment at Superfund sites are ident-
ified.  Potential secondary impacts of
available and potential decontamination
treatment methods are addressed in this
study.  Costs versus risk and projected
ultimate site usage are addressed.
Methods for monitoring the successfullness
of various procedures are defined.
tPB 85-201-234 (N.P. Barkley)

Modeling Remedial Actions at Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites

     The objective of this document is to
provide technical guidance on the select-
ion and application of models for evalua-
ting remedial action alternatives at
uncontrolled hazardous wastes sites.  The
volumes cover selection of models, simp-
lified methods for subsurface and waste
control actions,  numerical modeling of
surface, subsurface and waste control
actions, and analytical and numerical
models for evaluation of surface water
remedial actions.
tPB 85-211-357 (D.C. Ammon)
                                           -6-

-------
Leachate Plume Management

     This Handbook summarizes information
of leachate plume dynamics and plume
management alternatives gained by a study
of leachate plume management techniques.
Factors that affect leachate plume move-
ment key considerations in delineating the
current and future extent of the leachate
plume, technologies for controlling the
migration of plumes, and criteria for
evaluating and selecting plume management
alternatives are discussed.
tPB 86-/22330  (N.P. Barkley)

Systems to Accelerate the Stabilization
of Waste Deposits

     This document investigates in-situ
systems which accelerate the stabilization
of waste deposits.  In-situ applications
involve three essential elements: select-
ion of a chemical or biological agent
 (reactant) which can react with and
stabilize the waste, a method for delivery
of the reactant to the deposit and a
method for recovery of the reaction
products or mobilized waste.
     Four reactant categories-have Been
examined: biodegradation, surfactant-
assistant flushing, hydrolysis, and
oxidation.  Methods of delivery of react-
ants based upon gravity  include surface
flooding, ponding, surface spraying,
ditching, and  infiltration beds and
galleries.  Forced injection  (pumping)
may also be used.  Recovery systems using
gravity include open ditching and  buried
drains, and pumped methods  include .well-
point and deep well systems.
 tPB 87-112-306/AS  (W.E.  Grube)

Covers  for Uncontrolled  Hazardous Waste
Sites

      A handbook has been developed which  .
 can be  used as a  guidance document for
 the selection, design,  installation,  and
 long-term maintenance  of covers as remed-
 ial actions.   This handbook provides
 technical  information  for regulatory
 personnel as  well as guidance for  cover-
 system designers  and construction  engin-
 eers.  tEPA/540/2-85/002  (J.M.  Houthoofd)
Stabilization/Solidification of
Hazardous Waste

     Another handbook has been developed
to provide guidance for the evaluation,
selection, and use of solidification/
stabilization technology as a remedial
action alternative at uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites.  The planning for
the application of solidification/stabil-
ization is divided into two phases:
process selection and scenario selection.
Process selection is concerned with the
 chemistry of the stabilization/solid-
ification processes in the identification
of the composition of the waste.  Pres-
ented in the handbook are testing and
analysis techniques for characterizing
waste as a basis for selection of pre-
treatment and stabilization/solidification
processes.  Also data are developed on
the compatibility of additives and spec-
ific classes of waste, and testing systems
for the evaluation of stabilizaed/solid-
ified wastes are reviewed.  Scenario
selection is concerned with the develop-
ment of equipment requirements, construc-
tion sequencing, and exist estimating for
the chosen solidification/stabilization
process.  The handbook presents four basic
field scenarios, based on field surveys,
that have been used successfully.
tEPA/540/2-86/001   (J.M. Houthoofd)

Fugitive Dust Control at Hazardous Waste
Sites

     Field studies were performed to
determine the effectiveness of dust
control technologies  at hazardous sites.
In the first field study, dust suppressants
were tested to determine the  effectiveness
of fugitive dust control against wind
erosion from exposed  areas.   Based on  a
tracer sampling.protocol, the suppressants
were 100 percent effective  for- 1 to 4
weeks after application, with declining'
control efficiencies  thereafter.  The
second field study was an evaluation of
the effectiveness of  windscreens and
windscreen/dust suppressant combinations
 in controlling fugitive dust from  storage
piles. tEPA/540/2-85/003 (S.C.  James)
                                            -7-

-------
CONCLUSION

     The "technical Resource Documents  and
the Technical Handbooks  that are  being
prepared and updated  by  the Land  Pollu-
tion Control Division (LPCD)  are  a  series
of documents which provide  best engineer-
ing control technolgoy to meet the  needs
of RCRA and CERCLA, respectively.   The
TRD's provide design, operation,  and
evaluation information related to new
RCRA hazardous waste  disposal facilities
to assist the regulated  community and  the
permitting authorities.  The Technical
Handbooks provide reliable  and cost
effective remedial action technology
information related to Superfund  facil-
ities to assist the user community  and
on-scene coordinators.  These documents
and handbooks present the sum total of
the body of information and  experience
gained by the Agency over the years on a
given topic.  As new  information is
developed, the Agency intends to update
each of these documents and  handbooks  so
that they reflect the latest  state-of-
the-art information.
     More information about a specific
project of study can be obtained by
contacting the project officer referred
to in the text.  Project Officers can  be
contacted by writing or telephoning the
USEPA, Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory, Land Pollution
Control Division, 26 West St. Clair
Street, Cincinnati, Ohio  45268.
Phone: (513) 569-7871
KEX TO SYMBOLS:

*  These documents have been published and
   the reports are available from GPO by
   requesting the stock number.  Copies can
   be obtained for a price from the

      Superintendent of Documents
      U.S. Government Printing Office
      Washington, D.C.  20402.
      Phone:  (202)  782-3238.

t  These documents have been published and
   reports are available from NTIS by
   requesting the stock number.  Copies can
   be obtained for a price from the

      National Technical Information Service
      5285 Port Royal Road
      Springfield,  VA  22161.
      Phone:  (703)  487-4650.
                                          -8-

-------
    IMPLICATIONS OF CURRENT SOIL LINER PERMEABILITY RESEARCH RESULTS

          W. E. Grube, Jr., M. H. Roulier,  and J.  G. Herrmann

            Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                 U. S. Environmental  Protection Agency
                         Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268
ABSTRACT
     Since the 1970's hazardous waste 1egisi ation has specified soil
liner permeability (hydraulic conductivity) as a major criterion for
design of soil liners to contain hazardous  wastes disposed on land.
HWERL studies since 1972 have included over 30 individual  projects
investigating hydraulic features of compacted soils.   Soi1/permeant
liquid compatibility, applicability of laboratory  permeability tests,
field permeability testing, effective porosity,  and solute  transit  time
have been investigated.

     The type of test cell does not appreciably  affect the value for
permeability measured in the laboratory  for water alone.  When the
permeant liquid contains high concentrations  of  solutes, rigid wall
permeameters show greater increases in permeability (relative to water
alone) than triaxial  cells.  Increasing  the hydraulic gradient when
using a triaxial cell results in lower permeability values.   Triaxial
cells and consolidation cells can simulate  overburden loading stresses
on a soil liner but no data are available to  determine how well these
laboratory values predict permeability of the soil  liner after a
landfill cell is completely filled.  The compaction mold modified for
permeability measurement is the most sensitive geotechnical  laboratory
method to measure 1iner/1eachate compatibility.

     Construction acceptance is being tested  with infiltration test
devices.  Optimum size of infiltration test area versus the number of
test sites is being studied.  Collection lysimeters installed beneath
soil liners offer the most practical means  to reliably quantify seepage
through the liner system.  They also provide  an  opportunity to collect
tracer compounds or leachates solutes for calculation of transit times
through the 1i ner.

     Examination of soil liners in the field  consistently shows
heterogeneity in materials, fabric, moisture  content, density, and
texture.  Macrostructural units that provide  preferential  pathways for
rapid flow of liquids are common, but the amount of liquids moving in
these pathways is unknown.

      Laboratory-measured values demonstrate  the  1owest permeabi1ity
that a soil liner material can provide;  these values  should be regarded
as a goal that may be achieved in the field by skilled personnel only
under optimum conditions.  The uncertainties  about permeability/
                                     -9-

-------
 compatibility  testing  and  the  effect  of  construction  practice  on
 permeability of  the  completed  liner dictate  that  soil  liners for
 hazardous  waste  facilities must  be designed,  tested,  and  built with  a
 much  higher degree of  care than  has been  considered routine for civil
 works.
 RATIONALE
 RESEARCH
FOR PERMEABILITY
      The  Resource  Conservation
 and  Recovery  Act  (RCRA)  of  1976
 (PL  94-580);  as  amended  in  1984,
 (HSWA,  PL  98-616; and.
 regulations derived  from  these
 laws  provide  that soils  can  be
 used  as  a  component  of the  liner
 system  of  a waste disposal
 facility.  EPA  regulations
 specify  that  the soil liner  shall
 have  a  permeability  of no more
 than  1  x 10E-07 cm/sec and that
 the  liner  shall prevent migration
 through  it during the life of the -
 facility.  Specific  regulatory
 requirements  are found in the
 Code  of  Federal Regulations, 40
 CFR  Parts  264 and 265, available
 1n pub!ic  1ibraries.

      Fifteen years  ago,  questions
 based on principles  of soil
 chemistry  arose suggesting that
 solvents or other strong  chemical
 compounds  in waste and landfill
 leachates  would be expected to
 attack  a soil  liner  and make it
 more  permeable with  time.
 Results of early research pointed
 toward  several unsolved,  related
 questi ons:
      permeability methodology,
      effective porosity,
      field-scale measurement,

 Since then, EPA's HWERL in
 Cincinnati  conducted over 30
 studies evaluating clay soil
liner permeability and related
 issues.
EFFECT OF SOLVENTS AND DILUTIONS
ON PERMEABILITY
Our early efforts addressed the
question of soil-liner
compatibility with leachates (27
30).  Recent articles
(2,7,18,30,39) contain the-full
bibliographies that document work
we accomplished determining the
value of a permeability test to
measure 1iner/1eachate
'compatibi 1 i ty .
                                   Although  much  data  were
                             generated  which  demonstrated the
                            .adverse  effect  of  pure  solvents
                             and  high concentrations of  other
                             chemical compounds on soil  liner
                             permeability,  studies using
                             actual landfill  leachates of
                             diluted  solvents or  salt
                             solutions  showed an  almost
                             undetectable effect  in  the
                             laboratory  studies.  A  single
                             long-term  laboratory study was
                             reported (30) that incorporated
                             actual industrial waste liquids.
                             These  results over 10 years show
                             no clear change  in soil liner
                             permeability.   Recent data
                             (1,6,14) and others  continue to
                             demonstrate that in  laboratory
                             studies  dilute  solutions  or
                             leachates  of only several  hundred
                             ppm  solutes have no  effect.
                                  ASTM methods  (mainly D-2434
                             adapted to low-flow  rates) ha,ve
                             been applied to determine soil
                             liner permeability  (1,2,15,23).
                             Since the early 1980's, other
                             geotechnical engineering testing
                             laboratories and academic civil
                             engineering departments have also
                             conducted numerous experiments
                             investigating various aspects of
                             liner permeability, and its
                             measurement.  Citations listed
                             (28), document this  activity.
                             Johnson and Richter  (33)
                             provide an extensive compilation
                             of permeability studies up to
                             1967.  A critical
                             evaluation of all  of these
                             published reports  is beyond the
                             scope of this paper, but many of
                             the data generated by these
                             studies are important in
                             understanding the  current state
                             of soil  permeability knowledge.
                                    -10-

-------
     Extensive data have been
reported demonstrating that the
permeability of a compacted soil
increases as the dielectric
constant of the permeant liquid
decreases (8,28,36).  Although
many pure organic liquids have a
low dielectric constant, dilute
inorganic solutions also possess
a low dielectric constant.
Neither dilute inorganic
solutions nor dilutions of low-
dielectric-constant solvents have
been shown to significantly
affect soil  liner permeability.
Thus, dielectric constant of a
permeant liquid is not per se a
meaningful  measure of its
permeability performanceunless
it is a pure liquid or a mixture
of but a few pure liquids.
PERMEABILITY OF SOIL LINERS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD
     Laboratory permeability test
results frequently demonstrate
that the tested soil  presents a
hydraulic conductivity less than
that of the regulatory threshold,
1 x 10E-07 cm/sec, especially
where solute concentrations are
in the few hundred ppm range.
Recent reports (confirming data
first compiled by Olson and
Daniel(38), and still  widely
cited) observe that a  liner
constructed in the field with the
same soil  tested in the
laboratory has a seepage rate
representing a much higher
permeability than laboratory test
results show.  Since  the early
1980's our Laboratory  has been .
investigating the reasons for
this discrepancy.  Thus recent
studies have emphasized field
performance of hydraulic
barriers.   Our current research
efforts include attempts to (1)
quantify the areal  variability of
soil liner hydraulic  properties,
(2) obtain an accurate measure of
solute transit time through
several  lifts of liner
constructed by field  equipment,
and (3)  determine the  feasibility
of improving present  construction
practices in order to obtain a
soil, ,liner with a lower overall
permeability.  These studies are
in the early stages and will not
be discussed here.
      It is clear from numerous
laboratory permeability
measurements that many soils
demonstrate a permeability of 1 x
10E-09 cm/sec or lower.  These
values can be lowered in many
cases by additional measuress
such  as additives, modified
compaction, or. other soil
handling.  Additions of
bentonite, lime, Portland cement,
and other components to soils in
laboratory studies have resulted'
in substantially lower
permeability.  Where the
hydraulic conductivity is lower
than  about 1 x 10E-08 cm/sec,
diffusion processes move chemical
species at the same rate as
hydraulic flow. 'Thus by
constructing a relatively thic'k
soil  liner, with chemical
diffusion governing mobility,
pollutants can be prevented from
leaving the lined facility
through the'soil  liner for the
same  or longer time as that
provided by a relatively thin
liner of-synthetic material.
Therefore, soil  1 i ner-thickness1
of several feet,  with attendant
permeability of 10E-09 or lower
will  provide liquid containment  '
at least equal  to that obtainable
with  synthetic materials.  The
field scale liner must not
contain faults at any greater
magnitude or frequency than those
now found in comparable areas of
synthetic materials piaced as
large sheets.   The liner
construction industry must
demonstrate this  at full  field
scale.  The demonstration must
include long term containment as •
measured by lack  of seepage
through the constructed liner.
It will  challenge present
environmental  monitoring
techniques to  accurately
determine that  little or no'
                                   -11-

-------
liquids seep through a buried
soil structure during a time of
many decades.
LABORATORY PERMEABILITY TESTS
     Laboratory measurements are
made in order to determine
whether a candidate soil liner
material meets the permeability
specification of 1 x 10E-07
cm/sec, or to obtain an
evaluation of the compatibility
of a soil liner material with a
leachate or other solution.  The
latter purpose is served by
noting whether a significant
change in permeability occurs
when the leachate is introduced
into the testing system.
Numerous laboratory permeability
tests are also being conducted
simply to better understand soil/
solution interactions.
     Soils tested for
permeability in the laboratory
are first characterized by
standard engineering criteria.
These normally include

    -grain size distribution,
     including percent fines,

    -Atterberg Limits

    -water content

    -classification by the
Unified Soil Classification
System.
     ASTM procedures for these
tests specify that only field-
collected soil samples that pass
through, at largest, a sieve with
3/4-inch (19mm) openings are to
be tested.  Indeed, ASTM allows
up to 30% of a field sample to
contain fragments larger than
3/4-inch before disallowing a
Standard Proctor compaction test.
It is at this stage--when a soil
is specified as being suitable
for liner service-- that
laboratory testing results
exhibit serious shortcomings as
predictors of field performance.
     Three major apparatuses are
used to routinely determine soil
hydraulic conductivity in the
laboratory:  rigid wall  cell, or
modified compaction mold;
triaxial cell  modified for
permeability testing;  and
consolidation eel 1 (oedometer)
modified for directly measuring
permeability.   In evaluating  the
data generated by our studies and
those supported by other
institutions,  it is clear that
the differences among
permeability values for  each of
the cell types are not
significant when using water and
the same soil.  Thi s is
particularly true if one
considers than many commercial
geotechnical testing laboratories
consider agreement within a
factor of two  or three to be the
best obtainable on replicate
permeability analyses of fine-
grained soils.  A point  must be
made here that publication of
soil liner permeability  data in
detail greater than two
significant figures is probably
inappropriate, unless accompanied
by detailed description  of the
laboratory technique.
     Permeability testing using a
solvent, mixture, or actual
landfill leachate presents
several problems in a soil
permeability test.  These are not
insurmountable, however.   The
apparatus degradation problem is
solved by using resistant
materials, such as stainless
steel, plastics, or other
substances resistant to chemical
attack.  In the case of the
triaxial cell, several  different
materials have been used  to  solve
the problem of chemical attack of
the confining membrane.  Here the
user must be certain, however,
that some of the stiffer
materials used to resist  chemical
attack, such as Teflon  film,
aluminum foil, or multiple-layers
                                    -12-

-------
 of  these  materials,  do  not
 interfere with  the often-stated
 advantage of  the  triaxial method-
 -conforming the Latex membrane to
 the soil  sample surface  to  remove
 the possibility of sidewall
 leakage.   If  too  rigid  a membrane
 is  used,  the  lateral pressure
 that must be  applied so  the
 membrane  will conform with  the
 surface of the  soil  sample  may be
 so  high that  lateral
 consolidation occurs.
      The potential effect of
lateral consolidation must be
accounted for in each application
of the triaxial apparatus to a
study of 1 iner/1 eachate
compatibility.  So many data now
exist showing that soil
permeability decreases with
increasing  hydraulic gradient--
and concurrent  increases in
lateral confining stress — that
the triaxial cell must be
discouraged for use in soil-
1iner/1eachate  compatibility
measurement (31,p.375; 9,pp.72-
82; 10,pp47-8;  35,p.364;
22,p.1654;  45,p.405; 17,Fig.7;
25).  We recognize that triaxial
confinement is the only practical
apparatus to measure the
hydraulic conductivity of
undisturbed samples of a soil
liner, but  caution must be urged
to apply a  confining stress no
greater than is present in the
field.  A few reports in widely
distributed technical  literature
detail  the  application of the
triaxial  cell  to soil  liner
permeability testing
(10,15,23,29).  They commendably
present valuable details of the
method, but do not adequately
emphasize the the need to apply
only the lateral stress seen in
the field.  This restriction
effectively prohibits  the use of
high hydraulic gradients commonly
applied to  reduce testing time.
     The consolidation cell  is
useful  in measuring volume
changes of a test specimen during
permeation.  Applied stress
 should  not  exceed  field  values.
 Arguments that  this  apparatus
 simulates the  overburden .loading '
 of  landfilled  waste  and  that
 these pressures  will  heal  cracks
 that may form  from leachate
 interaction  with soil  liner
 materials fail  to  acknowledge the
 liklihood of variable  loading
 pressures over  a liner surface.
 Placement of drummed  waste, for
 example, may create  bridged voids
 within  the  landfill,  where the
 liner underneath a drum may
 experience  much  higher loading
 pressure than  areas  between
 drums.  There  are no  data
 available showing the degree of
 consolidation  present in liners
 beneath land disposal facilities.
     The modified compaction mold
permeameter described by EPA (43)
provides the most immediate
information regarding the
detrimental effect that a
leachate may have on a soil liner
material.  We recognize that
laboratory technicians need to
exercise care to ensure that
sample preparation within rigid
wall cells does not provide
immediate sidewall leakage.  Soil
shrinking because of
1iner/1eachate interaction may
rapidly increase measured
permeability and cause the
testing laboratory to conclude
that an incompatibility may
exist.  The value of the rigid-
wall permeability cell  in
providing a conservative estimate
of 1iner/1eachate compatibility,
by means of demonstrating a
change in permeabi1ity outweighs
disadvantages  such as lack  of
achieving complete sample
saturation.  Daniel  and
Broderick(16)  used the compaction
mold cell  because of its greater
sensitivity to potential
soi1/Ieachate  interactions.
Bowders et  al.(5) and Daniel  et
al.(17) discussed the advantages
of the rigid  and flexible wall
hydraulic conductivity cells  for
studying compatibility.   The
"double-ring  compaction  mold
permeameter"  has been proposed  as
                                     -13-

-------
a device more sensitive to
detection of side-wall  flow.
While this apparatus has
desirable features, no published
data describing its performance
on compacted clay have been
found.
     Several recent reports
relate the results of studies
using constant flow rate pumps at
high pressure to obtain
laboratory permeability results
more rapidly (37,12,31).
Although data from these
investigations provide useful
characterization of various soil
materials, the sample size of the
soil being tested with this
technique has been very small.
We believe that the larger sample
sizes common in commercial
geotechnical laboratories reduce
data dependence on the careful
techniques necessary in these
research studies.  Testing times
of several weeks or months result
in long 1iner/1eachate contact
times, which improves the
credibility of extrapolating
laboratory compatibility data to
long term field performance.  The
long testing times necessary to
obtain reliable data from the
larger sample sizes and modified
classical methods have not
appeared to present any practical
problems to commercial
laboratories.
      Deciding when  stable
 permeability has  been  reached  and
 a  test  can  be ended is  of  greater
 significance in obtaining  a
 realistic permeability  value than
 the  type of laboratory
 permeability cell.   There  is lack
 of agreement within the
 geotechnical testing community,
 and  we  have found that
 "experience" has  dominated the
 decision-making process.   Some
 laboratories rely upon  equal
 rates of inflow and outflow  of
 permeant liquid to  define  an
 equilibrium.   Peirce and
 Witter(39)  have recently
 published a more  objective
approach to determining  whether
hydraulic equilibrium has  been
reached.  They point out that
frequency of data collection  can
influence the test termination
decision.  Cell  inflow or
effluent volume  data can be
collected using  a variety  of
buret sizes and  collection ti.me
points.  One should not  use
calibrated columns of small
diameter to increase the accuracy
of small flow measurements, but
rather base the  data collection
on porevolume increments that
have passed through the  soil
sample.  At this time we suggest
0.05 to 0.10 porevolumes as the
smallest increment.  We  do not
know the optimum smallest
increment of porevolume  of
permeant liquid  flow that  will
provide reliable data from which
to calculate a permeability
value.  But, a meaningful  and
unbiased series  of measurements
is essential in order to
calculate a series of successive
permeabilities that may  be input
to statistical formulas  to
determine equilibrium.  Bryant
and Bodocsi  (9)  also present
methods to confirm that  an
equilibrium permeability has  been
reached.

FIELD  PERMEABILITY TESTS
     Demonstrating that a soil
liner constructed in the field
has the  required low permeability
is the "proof of the pudding."
Field testing of soil liner
permeability can be considered
from three  aspects:

     1.  Acceptance testing is a
measure  of  the quality of
construction in achieving the
specified permeability.
     2.  Performance monitoring
provides a  measure of the seepage
through  the soil liner over long
periods  of  use.
     3.  Transit time is a measure
of the time that a soil liner
will prevent a leachate solute
from migrating out of the bottom
                                     -14-

-------
of the  liner  into the  subsoils
below a waste disposal  facility

            Size of Soil Mass
               Tested
  Number of
Samples Tested
Size or Frequency
   of Property
   Figure 1.   Interrelated
problems affecting accurately
characterizing the hydraulic
performance of a soil liner.
     Figure 1 depicts the
problems facing us in accurately
characterizing the hydraulic
performance of a soil liner in-
place.  This picture does not
address methodology problems
inherent in trying to quantify
very low flow rates characterized
by a hydraulic conductivity of
10E-07 cm/sec or lower.  Factors
such as evaporation loss, liquid
flow volume quantification, leak-
proof apparatus, determination of
when to stop measurements because
steady-state fl ow-has been
achieved, and statistical
treatment of raw data are aspects
that must be dealt with.

      Numbers of soil samples
tested(NSST) to determine the in-
the-field permeability is being
addressed by geostatistical
analyses of data obtained from
our studies (41).  NSST should be
directly related to the size and
frequency of occurrence of soil
liner discontinutities that
provide higher flow rates than
allowed by a 10E-07 cm/sec
specification.   The NSST are
likely to be severely affected by
economic considerations and by
the need to protect the
environment from landfill
seepage.  The size of the soil
mass tested refers to the
diameter of a core or to the
surface area of  the sample being
examined.  The  sample needs  to be
sufficiently large to include
 representative soil  properties,
 both well-mixed homogeneous mass
 as well  as occasional  regions  of
 heterogeneities that permit
 higher hydraulic flows.

      The property of the soil
 liner being tested is  the
 hydraulic  flow rate.   As
 discussed later in this  paper,
 flow appears to be dominantly
 controlled by porous regions in a
 heterogeneous soil  liner.  The
 spatial  extent of these
 discontinuties in the  liner
 matrix needs to be known so that
 they can be accounted  for in
 sampling schemes.  You need to
 know the size and distribution of
•hydraulic discontinuities in,
 order to reliably detect
 hydraulic discontinuities.   In
 practice the trade-offs  depicted
 in  Figure 1 need to  be recognized
 and accounted for in sampling
 schemes.

      EPA's Minimum Technology
 6uidance(44) states  a  purpose  of
 the compacted soil  liner is to
 decrease leakage in  the  event  of
 leakage  through the  FML
 component, and increase  the
 efficiency of the .secondary
 leachate  collectib'n  system.  In
 order to  be effective  for this
 purpose,  the compacted soil  liner
 must be  uniform in  its property
 of  low permeability.   Field
 permeability tests must  be  aimed
 toward evaluating the
 permeability uniformity  of  as
 large soil  liner masses  as
 possible.   Determination  that  a
 soil  liner meets a hydraulic
 conductivity specification  must
 therefore  take  into  account the
 area of  liner tested,  as  well  as
 the validity of the  measurement
 method.   If one suspects  that  a
 certain  proportion of  the soil
 liner contains  flaws that will
 permit  high  seepage  rates,  then
 these flaws  should be  included
 within the area  of. soil  liner
 evaluated  to ascertain whether
 the permeability specification
 has  been  met.   In  this case
 either  a  large  area  should  be
 evaluated  for  permeability,  or
                                    -15-

-------
adequate area! representation by
numerous small samples must be
provided and should be consistent
with accepted statistical
practice.  The questions of how
many samples, and of what size,
must be addressed.  We believe
that large area infiltration and
seepage data obtained from a test
section constructed with full
scale equipment represents the
current state-of-the-art.
Construction Acceptance Testing
     In reports of soil liner
design and construction it is
often stated that the lowest
permeability is obtained by
compacting at a moisture content
wetter than the optimum found on
a moisture-density curve after
Proctor compaction. Recent
laboratory studies(30, 9, 4,)
reinforce the data from early
studies by Lambe and Mitchell
showing lower hydraulic
conductivity as the soil is
compacted at moisture contents
wet of optimum.  It is unclear
exactly at what moisture content
wet of optimum the field
workability of a clayey soil
becomes impossible.  Our
experience is that construction
contractors tend to be quite
conservative--!'n that they will
err on the dry side because they
know that soil that is extremely
wet is more difficult to compact,
     Figure 2 s.hows the variation
1n compaction moisture content
across an i-ntensively studied
soil liner section of 1/20 acre.
In this case the optimum moisture
was 17.8%;  95% and 105% of
optimum are 16.9% and 18.7%
respectively.  We have collected
both infiltration and seepage
data from this soil liner area
and have calculated comparable
permeabilities.  We are currently
measuring the permeabilities of
intact cores taken from an
intensive sampling array across
this experimental area.  These
data will  comprise an extensive
set comparing laboratory and
field permeability under
carefully  controlled conditions
   Lift!
               Lift 2
                           Lifts
    II<95% OPT

       >105% OPT
95-105% OPT
   Figure 2.  Distribution of
compaction moisture contents in
lifts of an experimental soil
liner based on nuclear surface
moisture meter (from 41).
     Large infiltration rings,
particularly the recently
developed closed inner ring
types, are being rapidly accepted
by state and private
organizations.  Using large rings
appears to be the best current
approach to more rapidly verify
the quality of soil  liner
construction.  Steady state flow
has been achieved after only a
few days (19).  Objections have
been voiced that these devices
only evaluate the surface few
i nches of a total 1i ner
installation.  Known applications
so far have been on soil liner
test sections, completed facility
liners, and clay cover soil
layers.  They can also be used to
test different lifts in a liner
section several feet thick.
Infiltration ring approaches
simulate an event where a small
pond of leachate comes into
contact with a soil  liner, such
as leakage from above.  Large
                                    -16-

-------
 closed-top  infiltration  rings  are
 easy  to  install  and monitor  and
 can  represent  a  significantly
 large  area.  Small double-ring
 apparatuses, such  as  applied to
 "perc-tests" for wastewater
 application to agricultural
 fields,  should not be used for
 soil  liner  testing unless
 extensively modified.
 Evaporation control and  accurate
 measurement of small  flows are
 essential in determining field
 permeability.  Several in-situ
 permeability test methods have
 been  recently described  (20);  it
 was concluded that an objective
 of an  in-situ test should be to
 evaluate a  representative volume
 of soil.  Clearly, this  objective
 can be better met by  using larger
 devices.
     Our observations of dye
infiltration from water ponded on
test sections and our morphologic
examination  of soil fabric lead
us to conclude that soil liner
test sections must be constructed
in at least four lifts.  We have
observed large variability in
amounts of unbroken native soil
clods in the first lift above the
liner foundation and variable
thickness in the surficial lift
where the surface has been bladed
to reach a specified grade.
Reades (40) also appears to
negate the value of the surface
lift.  If one constructs a test
section of only four lifts,
potential construction
compromises that are present in
the basal and surficial  lifts
leave only the middle two lifts
as the effective hydraulic
barrier.  Thus a fault, such as
inter-lift transport paths
between the two middle lifts,
brings about high permeability
results and/or short solute
transit times through the total
test section.  The design,
construction, and operation of a
field-scale permeability test on
the test section of a soil  liner
has evolved into a much  greater
task than the usual  compaction
test section practiced by all
 earthwork  engineers.   Further,
 present  construction  quality
 assurance  guidelines  require
 documentation that the  entire
 facility liner was constructed in
 the  same manner  as was  the test
 section, so that test  section
 data  are accurately
 representative of the  full-scale
 soil  liner performance.
      The  presence of
 heterogeneity in the soil mass of
 the test  section requires that
 the factors depicted in  Figure 1
 be applied to permeability and
 other tests applied to the test
 section.  Cores taken for
 laboratory analyses or
 installation of small diameter
 in-situ permeability sensors may
 evaluate  too small a volume of
 soil to capture major hydraulic
 pathways.  Thorough soil pulver-
 ization or mixing may reduce
 these problems.
     The nuclear surface
moisture-density meter, in
backscatter mode, is routinely
used to verify that the design
specifications are met on a
compacted soil liner.  Figure 3
clearly shows that the detected
neutron backscatter is reflected
by the total soil mass in perhaps
a 9-inch cube beneath the
instrument.  Our observations of
permeant liquid flow along
fracture planes, faces of
adjoining unbroken native soil
clods, and small-scale less dense
regions where compactor feet have
not directly compacted the soil
suggest that the soil  volume
exposed to the area and volume
averaging effect of the neutron
probe is simply too large for the
neutron probe to detect
significant liquid flow pathways.
Where research data have
consistently shown that only a
small  percentage of the liner
mass is active in permeant liquid
transmission, it follows that a
measurement of bulk properties of
a soil  liner is unlikely to
detect small flaws that are
                                   -17-

-------
hydraulically significant.  This
conclusion simply means that the
Industry would benefit from a
construction quality measurement
technique that can reliably
detect small soil liner
discontinuities  .
               -SUB-BASE GRADE
 Source
Surface
Detectors
                          Photon Paths
   Figure 3.  Geometry and scale
considerations of nuclear
moisture-density probe in
backscatter mode (from 42).
Long-Term Performance
     The Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984, and
ensuing regulations, specify that
no constituent shall migrate
through a lower soil liner
"...during the period such
facility remains in operation
(including any post-closure
monitoring period)."  This period
normally is several decades.  A
recent article (11) referred to a
Canadian study that found that
numerous hazardous waste disposal
sites "leaked after an average of
14 years."  Long-term containment
performance of a soil liner can
only be measured by detecting
leakage, or its absence.
Collection lysimeters appear to
be the most credible means to
measure the quantity and quality
of liquid that seeps through a
soil liner over an extended time
period(Fig. 4).  Some type of
underdrain system is also needed
to collect seepage that can be
analyzed to evaluate the transit
time of solutes through a soil
liner.  The State of Wisconsin
has for several years been
requiring the installation of
collection lysimeters beneath
lined disposal facilities (34).
Clearly, a device that intercepts
and quantifies leachate exiting
                COMPACTED
               SUB-BASE SOIL
                                COLLECTION DRAIN
                                                    GRANULAR-
                                                   BLANKET GRAVEL
               Figure  4.   Cross  section  of  a
            leachate collection  lysimeter.
            at  the  bottom  of  a  liner  is  the
            best  means  of  determining whether
            and when  a  constituent  has  passed
            through the liner.   The
            collection  lysimeter,  however,  is
            not a simple answer to  satisfying
            the regulations.   Sizes of  the
            leachate  interception  area  in  a
            compilation (34)  of Wisconsin
            lysimeters  ranged from  25 sq  ft
            to  7,400  sq ft.   The installation
            of  these  collection lysimeters
            must  be made very carefully  to
            ensure  that any  and all liquids
            collected are  not lost  but  are
            conveyed  to an  outlet  for
            measurement (or  treatment if  in
            significant quantities).   Long-
            term  performance  measurement
            requires  that  a  collection
            lysimeter be placed beneath  the
            entire  volume  of  the liner  and
            not arbitrarily  located in  some
            convenient  area  of  the  surface  or
            other region of  the liner.
            Design, materials,  and
            construction must incorporate  the
            highest possible  quality  for  two
            important reasons:  (1)  the
            collection  structure must perform
            perfectly for  an  unknown  long
            time  period, and  (2) after
            construction,  the lysimeter  will
            be  unseen and  unaccessible  for
            any future  maintenance.
            Alternative long-term  performance
            monitoring  schemes, such  as
            monitoring  well  arrays  are  not
            within  the  scope  of this  paper.
                                    -18-

-------
Transit Time
     To gai n approval , an
applicant for a land  disposal
facility construction permit
normally provides hydraulic
conductivity data on  the soil to
be used in a liner.   "Knowledge
of the liner permeability is not
sufficient information to
accurately estimate the length of
time of liner effectiveness"
(32).  To demonstrate that
leachate constituents will not
pass through a proposed liner
system, a test section of
compacted soil  liner  is an
accepted structure to demonstrate
hydraulic performance.
Installing a collection lysimeter
beneath this test section
provides an opportunity to
collect any seepage passing
through if water or other liquid
is ponded on the surface.  Figure
5 depicts a possible  approach to
such a test section.  Adding
tracer compounds to surface
ponding allows  ready  observation
of whether and when a solute
exits the bottom of the liner.
We find very few published data
indicating liquid or  solute
transit time for soil liners
built in recent years.  One
company has installed detection
electrodes to try to monitor
passage of a wetting front
through a soil  liner.(3)
       Our  experimental studies
 show  a  rapid transit time of
 tracer  solutes through several
 lifts  of compacted soil; these
 soil  liners demonstrated low
 permeabilities, less than 1 x
 10E-07  cm/sec.  Careful
 examination of the compacted soil
 lifts  involved have clearly shown
 that  dyed  liquids follow a few
 preferential pathways through a
 lift:  commonly moving laterally
 across  a lift interface and
 thence  again downward through a
 small  zone in the next lift.
 Footed  compaction rollers are
 widely  used to achieve the shear
 deformation of a kneading process
 shown  by laboratory studies to
 result  in  lower permeability than
 static  or  impact compaction.
   Figure 5.   Ponded or
underdrained  test fill.
                                          Figure  6.   Compaction  of  a
                                       multi-lift soil  liner  by  a  footed
                                       roller.
Figure 6 illustrates the
variability in compaction
produced'by a footed roller where
the number of passes has been
inadequate to completely cover
the surface of the lift being
compacted.  Although the number
of passes  must depend on the foot
area and the roller drum's  foot
density, at least 18 passes must
be made with commonly available
footed rollers to completely
                                  -19-

-------
compact an area.  Our
observations of vertical  cross-
sections of soil liners several
feet thick show amazing
heterogeneity within a compacted
lift and adjacent lifts.   We
conclude from liner profile
studies that regions of lesser
density, even as small as a
centimeter in dimension,  comprise
a significant fluid flow  pathway.
     Our observations are
consistent with the critical view
of liner macrostructure by Folkes
(24).  A percolating liquid seeks
the path of least resistance,
which need not be a clear
desiccation crack or fracture
within a liner of otherwise
plastic soil.  These observations
support hypotheses that lack of
uniform soil compaction is a
major contributor to high seepage
rates through soil liners.
Figure 7 compares the constructed
fabric of a compacted soil where
it must support a load and where
it must contain a liquid.  We
believe that structural
competence has not yet been shown
to provide the liquid containment
required of a landfill liner.
     Structural Support
                     Containment

2
—
V
_—


V
~
"7~7 /T-/ /
   Figure 7.  Multi-lift soil
compacted by footed roller and
used for support or containment.
      Where cracks and/or less-
dense soil regions are connected,
a ponded liquid will penetrate
the liner system much more
rapidly than transit time models
predict.  We have only been able
to characterize these flow
pathways in field-constructed
liners using dyes in ponded
water, followed by careful soil
morphology studies of excavated
liners cross-sections.  Liner
morphology studies have also
illustrated the dramatic effect
of unbroken native soil clods in
providing liquid flow short-
circuits.  Daniel's laboratory
study of chunk si ze vs
permeability (13) has been widely
cited as illustrative of the
effect of soil clod size on
permeability.  Folkes (24)
brought out the dependence of
compacted soil permeability on
soil structure, aggregate
orientation, and other factors.
He also cited several earlier-
studies that concluded that
permeability is controlled by
macropore distribution.  Dunn
(21) has recognized the
importance of the structure of
the field-compacted soil liner in
restricting fluid flow.  The
chunk-size in Daniel's study--
1/16 to 3/8 inch — represents
laboratory sieving, and field
liner soils are unlikely to be
limited to uniform clods this
small.  Field-run borrow soils
commonly contain gravel-sized
stones or soil clods, unless
carefully screened.   In examining
field-constructed soil liners, we
invariably see evidence of fluid
flow around the surfaces of
gravel or soil clods  retaining
their native size.  We also see
evidence that these native gravel
or clods are pushed intact
through the matrix of surrounding
soil during lift compaction.
Frequently a relatively smooth
plane results where a gravel  or
clod has been so pushed.  Close
examination has clearly shown
these planes to be paths of
liquid flow.  Failure to break
down clods of native  soil during
liner construction creates the
mechanism for rapid transit time
through the soil liner simply by
increasing the heterogeneity  of
the liner.
                                    -20-

-------
     Laboratory studies of liquid
or solute transit time have tried
to identify a more accurate
measure of "effective porosity "
of soil liners.  Effective
porosity has been described as
that portion of the total  liner
porosity that contributes
significantly to fluid flow.  We
have conducted several
investigations showing that
effective porosity determined on
laboratory prepared compacted
clay soils and in limited  field
investigations is only in  the
range of a few percent (32).
That is, effective porosity
comprises only about 10% of the
total liner porosity.  Gordon
(26) presents a model for
effective porosity where fracture
characterization and continutiy
are known.  It requires input of
field data for fractures,  but
continuing porous zones could
probably be handled as well.
     Collection lysimeters,
porous probes placed at different
depths, or relatively unverified
technologies of wetting front
detectors represent the range of
methods available to quantify
leachate transit time.  Computer
model predictions of transit time
have thus far been unable to
accurately predict field events.
This is because soil liners
constructed in the field contain
properties and features which
have been excluded from models.
CONCLUSIONS
     Laboratory-measured liner
soil permeabilities demonstrate
the lowest values that a soil
material can provide;  these
values should be regarded only as
a goal that may be achieved in a
field structure by skilled
personnel under the best
conditions.

     Use of the modi fi ed
compaction mold for
1iner/1eachate compatibility
tests removes an unaccounted-for
variable in consolidation cells
and triaxial  cells.  This
variable is the applied stress
that is  likely to close actual
desiccation cracks or densify
small porous  zones. Although
substantial stresses are present
on  soil  liners in place
underneath waste fills, it is
likely that this will  not be
uniform, and  unstressed or weakly
stressed regions may allow
permeation of leachates.

     A substantial data base
exists demonstrating the adverse
effect of pure or relatively pure
organic  solvents on compacted
soil liners.   Long-term effects
of  soil  liner exposure to dilute
chemicals or  leachates have not
yet been demonstrated.  Available
data have resulted in regulations
that now prohibit land disposal
of  solvents or free liquids.

     Traditional soil  moisture-
density  measurement procedures
are unlikely  to detect soil liner
features that are hydraulically
impo rtant.

     Innocuous tracer compounds,
such as  dyes  and inorganic ions,
when added to water ponded on
liner test sections can be
detected in pore water or seepage
water.  Collection lysimeters or
porous probes within the soil
liner can be  monitored for the
presence of tracers.  Time of
detection after addition can.be
used' to  calculate realistic
solute transit times through the
soil liner.

     Collection lysimeters must
be  installed  under liner areas
that are representative of the
total liner area.  The
underdrained  area must not be
constructed with special care
that is  not applied to the rest
of  the facility liner.  Long-term
soil liner performance can only
be  determined by long-term
monitoring.
                                   -21-

-------
     The references cited in this
paper should be examined, but
also the references in the cited
papers should be studied because
they provide essential
background.

REFERENCES
1.   Acar. Y. B., A. Hamidon, S.
     Field, and L. Scott. 1984.
     The Effect of Organic Fluids
     on Hydraulic Conductivity of
     Compacted Kaolinite. in
     Hydraulic Barriers for Soil
     and Rock, ASTM STP 874,
     avail. from ASTM,
     Philadelphia, PA.

2.   Acar, Y. B, and A. Ghosh.
     1986. Role of Activity in
     Hydraulic Conductivity of
     Compacted Soils Permeated
     with Acetone, in Proc. Int.
     Symp. on Environmental
     Geotechnology, ed. H. Y.
     Fang, Envo Publ . Co., Inc.
     pp. 403-412.

3.   Bacopoulos, A. 1986.
     Development and Operation of
     the Keele Valley Landfill
     Site, Maple, Ontario,
     Canada, in Proc. Ninth
     Annual Madison Waste
     Conference, Univ. Wisconsin-
     Madison, pp. 355-376.

4.   Boutwell, G. P., and V. R.
     Donald. 1982. Compacted Clay
     Liners for Industrial Waste
     Disposal.  ASCE National
     Meeting, Las Vegas, NV,
     April , 23 pp.

5.   Bowders, J. J., D. E.
     Daniel, G. P. Broderick, and
     H. M. Liljestrand.  1985.
     Methods for Testing the
     Compatibility of Clay Liners
     with Landfill Leachate.  in
     Hazardous and Industrial
     Solid Waste Testing, 4th
     Symposium, ASTM STP 886, pp.
     233-250.

6.   Brown, K. W., and J. C.
     Thomas. 1985. Influence of
     Concentrations of Organic
9.
10,
11.


12.
Chemicals on the Colloidal
Structure and Hydraulic
Conductivity of Clay Soils.
in Proc.  llth Rsch Symp.  on
Land Disposal of Haz. Waste,
EPA/600/9-85/013, HWERL,
USEPA, Cincinnati,.Oh 45268

Brown, K. W., J. C.  Thomas,
and J. W. Green. 1986. Field
Cell Verification of the
Effects of Concentrated
Organic Solvents on  the
Conductivity of Compacted
Soils, in Haz. Waste and
Haz. Matls., 3(1):1-20.

Brown, K. W. 1986.  Use of
Soils to  Retain Waste in
Landfills and Surface
Impoundments,  in
Utilization, Treatment, and
Disposal  of Waste on Land,
E.C.A. Runge, ed.'publ. by
Soil Science Society of
America,  Madison, WI, 23  pp.

Bryant, J., and A. Bodocsi.
1986. Precision and
Reliability of Laboratory
Permeability Measurements.
EPA-600/2-86-097, HWERL,
USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio
45268. 177 pp. avail, from
NTIS as # PB87 113791/AS.

Carpenter, G. W., and R.  W.
Stephenson. 1986.
Permeability Testing in the
Tri axi al  Cell . in
Geotechnical Testing
Journal ,GTJODJ, 9(1) :3-9,
March.        '
CE/ASCE, 1987
issue, p. 49
February
Coldewey, W. G.  1984.
Measurement of Low
Permeability Coefficients by
Means of Electronic
Instruments,  in Proc.  5th
Nat!. Conf. on Mgmt. of
Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste
Sites, Washington, DC.
available from HMCRI, 9300
Columbia Blvd., Silver
Spring, MD, pp. 584-587.
                                   -22-

-------
13.  Daniel, D.  E.  1981.  Problems
     i n Predi cti ng  the
     Permeability of Compacted
     Clay Liners,  in Proc. Symp.
     on Uranium  Mill Tailings
     Management,  Civil Eng,
     Dept., Colorado State
     University,  Ft. Collins, pp.
     665-675.

14.  Daniel, D.  E.  and H. M.
     Liljestrand. 1984a.  Effects
     of Landfill  Leachates on
     Natural Liner  Systems.
     Geotech.  Engnrg, Rpt. GR83-
     6, Civil  Eng.  Dept., Univ.
     Texas, Austin, TX. 169 pp.

15.  Dani el, D.  E., S. J .
     Trautwein,  S.  S. Boynton,
     and D. E. Foreman. 1984b.
     Permeability Testing with
     Flexible-Wall  Permeameters.
     in Geotechnical Testing
     Journal,  GTJODJ, 7(3):113-
     122, Sept.

16.  Daniel, D.  E.  and G. P.
     Broderick.  1985.
     Stabilization  of Compacted
     Clay Against Attack  by
     Concentrated Organic
     Chemicals.   Geotechn Eng.
     Report GR85-18, Civil Eng.
     Dept., Univ. Texas-Austin,
     105 pp.

17.  Daniel , D.  E., D. C.
     Anderson, and  S. S.  Boynton.
     1985a. Fixed-Wall vs.
     Flexible-wall  Permeameters.
     in Hydraulic Barriers for
     Soil and Rock, ASTM STP 874,
     pp.107-123.

18.   Daniel,  D.  E., D. E.
     Foreman,  and S. R. Day.
     1985b. Effects of Hydraulic
     Gradient  and Field Testing
     on Hydraulic Conductivity of
     Soil.  Draft Final Project
     Report of Cooperative
     Agreement CR810165,
     submitted to HWERL,  USEPA,
     Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268,.434
     pp.

19.  Dani el , D.  E.  and S. J.
     Trautwein.  1986. Field
     Permeability Test for
     Earthen Liners.  Proc.  In-
     Situ '86, ASCE Specialty
     Conf. on Use of In-Situ
     Tests in Geotech.  Eng.,
     Blacksburg, VA, Jun 1986, 15
     pp.

20.  Daniel, D. E. 1987.
     Hydraulic Conductivity  Tests
     for  Clay Liners.  in Proc.
     Ninth Annual Symposium  on
     Geotechnical and
     Geohydrological Aspects of
     Waste Mgmt. Colo.  State
     Univ.,  Ft. Collins, 20  pp.

21.  Dunn, R. J. 1986.   Clay
     Liners  and Barriers -
     Considerations of  Compacted
     Clay Structure.  in Proc.
     Intl. Symp. on Environmental
     Geotechnology, H.  Y. Fang,
     ed . , Lehi gh Univ.,
     Bethlehem, PA, pp. 293-302.

22.  Dunn, R. J., and J. K.
     Mitchell.  1984.  Fluid
     Conductivity Testing of
     Fine-Grained Soils.  J.
     Geotech. Eng. ASCE, Vol.
     110, No. 11, pp.1648-1665.

23.  Evans,  J. C. and H. Y.  Fang.
     1986. Triaxial Equipment for
     Permeability Testing with
     Hazardous and Toxic
     Permeants. in Geotechnical
     Testing Journal, GTJODJ,
     9(3) :126-132.

24.  Folkes, D. J. 1982.  Fifth
     Canadian Geotechnical
     Colloquium:  Control of
     Contaminant Migration by the
     Use  of  Liners.  Can Geotech.
     J. 19:320-344.

25.  Foreman, D. E. 1984. The
     Effects of Hydraulic
     Gradient and Concentrated
     Organic Chemicals  on the
     Hydraulic Conductivity  of
     Compacted Clay.  M.S.
     Thesis, Univ. of Texas-
     Austi n , 345 pp.

26.  Gordon, M. J. 1986.
     Dependence of Effective
     Porosity on Fracture
     Continuity in Fractured
                                    -23-

-------
     Media.  Ground Water,
     24(4):446-452.

27.  Green, W. J., G. F. Lee, and      32,
     R. A. Jones. 1979. Impact of
     Organic Solvents on the
     Integrity of Clay Liners for
     Industrial Waste Disposal
     Pits: Implications for
     Groundwater Contamination.
     Final Project Report, Grant
     No. R-804549 from the USEPA.
     avail, only from NTIS,            33,
     Springfield, VA as # PB-81-
     213423, 149 pp.

28.  Grube, W. E. ,Jr. 1986.
     Reference List on Hydraulic
     Conductivity Measurements
     for Containment of Landfill
     Leachate.  in Geotechnical
     News, 4(2):16-18, June.           34.
     BiTech Publishers Ltd.,
     Suite 801-1030 W. Georgia
     St., Vancouver, BC, Canada
     V6E 2Y3.

29.  Haji-Djafari , S. and J. C.
     Wright,Jr. 1983. Determining
     the Long-Term Effects of
     Interactions between Waste
     Permeants and Porous Media.
     in Hazardous and Industrial       35.
     Solid Waste Testing:Second
     Volume, ASTM STP 805.

30.  Haxo, H. E., Jr., R. S.
     Haxo, N. A. Nelson, P. D.
     Haxo, R. M. White, and S.
     Dakessian. 1985. Liner
     Materials Exposed to
     Hazardous and Toxic Wastes.
     EPA/600/2-84/169. HWERL,
     USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio           36.
     45268. available from NTIS
     as PB 85-121-333.

31.  Henry, H. R., G. P. Whittle,
     T. A. Carlton, and R. J.
     Graves. 1985. Effects of
     Hazardous Waste Chemicals on
     the Permeability of Rock and
     Clay Contaminant Containment
     Media as Related to the
     Transport of Pollutants to
     Groundv/ater.  in                  37.
     Hydrogeology of Rocks of Low
     Permeability, Memoires Int.
     Ass'n. of Hydrogeologists,
17th Internat. Congress,
Tucson, AZ, pp. 370-381.

Horton, R., M. L. Thompson,
and J. F. McBride. 1987.
Method of Estimating the
Travel Time of
Noninteracting Solutes
Through Compacted Soil
Material.  Soil Sci . Soc.
Am. J. 51:48-53.

Johnson, A. I., and  R. C.
Richter. 1967. Selected
Bibliography on Permeability
and Capillarity Testing of
Rock and Soil  Materials, in
Permeability and Capillarity
of Soils, ASTM STP 417, pp.
176-210.

Kmet, P., and  D. E.
Lindorff.  1983. Use of
Collection Lysimeters in
Monitoring Sanitary  Landfill
Performance,   presented at
Nat'l  Water Well Assn. Conf.
on Characterization  and
Monitoring of  the Vadose
(Unsaturated)  Zone,  Las
Vegas, NV, Dec. 1983, 19 pp.

Korfi at is , G.  P., A. C.
Demetracopoulos , and J. R.
Shuring.  1986.  Laboratory
Testing for Permeability and
Dispersivity of Cohesive
Soils.  in Proc. Int. Symp.
on Envi ronmental
Geotechnology , H. Y. Fang,
ed. , Lehi gh Univ.,
Bethlehem, PA, pp. 363-369.

Mashni , C. I., H. P. Warner,
and W. E. Grube, Jr.  1985.
Laboratory Determination of
Dielectric Constant  and
Surface Tension as Measures
of Leachate/Liner
Compatibility,  in Proc.
llth Annual Rsch. Sypm. on
Land Disposal  of Haz. Waste,
EPA/600/9-85/013, avail from
NTIS as # PB 85 196376.

Olsen, H. W.,  R. W.  Nichols,
and T. L. Rice. 1985. Low
Gradient Permeability
Measurements  in a Triaxial
                                   -24-

-------
38,
39,
40,
41,
42,
43,
System.  Geotechnique, June
1985, pp.145-157.

Olson, R. E. and D. E.
Daniel. 1981. Measurement of
the Hydraulic Conductivity
of Fine-Grained Soils, in
Permeability and Groundwater
Contaminant Transport, ASTM
STP 746, T. F. Zimmie and C.
0. Riggs, eds. pp. 18-64.
Peirce, J. J.
Witter. 1986.
Criteria for
Permeabi1i ty
Geotech. Eng.
,  and K. A.
 Termi nation
Clay
Testing. J.
 ASCE,
     Double Liner Systems for
     Landfills and Surface
     Impoundments --Design,
     Construction, and Operation,
     EPA/530-SW-85-014.  USEPA,
     401 M. St. SW, Washington,
     DC 20460, 71 pp.

45.  Zimmie, T. F., J. S. Doynow,
     and J. T. Wardell.  1981.
     Permeability Testing of
     Soils for Hazardous Waste
     Disposal  Sites,  in Proc.
     Intl  Conf. on Soil Mechanics
     and Foundation Eng.,
     Stockholm, pp. 403-406.
44,
112(9):841-854, Sept.

Reades,  D. W.  1986.
Laboratory and Field
Permeability Tests on Clay
Liners.   in Proc. "Waste
Tech  '86", Nat'l  Solid Waste
Mgmt. Assn and Waste Age
magazine, Chicago, IL, Oct.
1986, 7  pp.

Rogowski, A. S. 1985.
Effectiveness of  a Compacted
Clay Liner in Preventing
Ground Water Contamination.
in Proc. Fifth Nat'l Symp.
and Exp'n on Aquifer
Restoration and Ground Water
Monitoring, NWWA,
Worthington, OH 43085, pp.
412-429.

Rogows ki , A. S. ,  B.  E.
Weinrich and D. E. Simons.
1985. Permeability
Assessment in a Compacted
Clay Liner.  in Proc. 8th
Annual Madison Waste
Conference-Municipal and
Industrial Waste, Univ. of
Wisconsin-Madison, pp. 315-
336.

USEPA. 1983. Lining  of Waste
Impoundment and Disposal
Facilities. SW-870.   Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Washington, DC.
avail from NTIS as PB 81-
166365.  448 pp.

USEPA.  1985.  Draft Minimum
Technology Guidance  on
                                   -25-

-------
                  THE BEHAVIOR AND ASSIMILATION OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC
                  PRIORITY POLLUTANTS CODISPOSED WITH MUNICIPAL REFUSE -
                                    A PROGRESS REPORT

                Frederick G. Pohland, Wendall H. Cross and Joseph P. Gould
                               School of Civil Engineering
                             Georgia Institute of Technology
                                    Atlanta, GA 30332
                                         ABSTRACT

     The behavior and possible assimilation of organic and inorganic priority pollutants
oodisposed with refuse are being investigated in ten simulated landfill columns operated
under single pass leaching or leachate recycle.  The priority pollutants include
selected organic compounds and three different"loading levels of heavy metals mixed with
municipal refuse.  After being brought to indicated field capacity with water additions,
leachate and gas"from the ten columns were analyzed for routine indicator parameters as
well as the selected priority pollutants.

     Preliminary results indicate that the presence of priority pollutants exhibited
little apparent influence on the progress of refuse conversion into the acid
fermentation phase of stabilization.  Trends indicative of assimilative capacity,
particularly with respect to the inorganic priority pollutants, are beginning to be
established as the various biological and physical-chemical mechanisms of attenuation
take effect.  Microbial mediation of the chemical environment has encouraged
precipitation and complexation or sorption of admixed species as gas and leachate
constituents are partitioned and released from the waste mass.  Moreover, leachate
recycle tends to regulate this process, contain the various leached ingredients in a
more homogeneous medium, provide greater saturation and contact opportunity, and permit
better inspection and operational control of the overall mechanisms of in situ
assimilation.
INTRODUCTION

     Landfill codisposal of municipal
refuse and organic and inorganic priority
pollutants emanating from households and
small quantity hazardous waste generators
has become common practice in many areas
throughout the country.  Unfortunately,
this practice has received limited
scientific scrutiny and a general lack of
understanding prevails with respect to
loading limits and associated potentials
for adverse environmental impact.
Therefore, comprehensive evaluation of
these impacts and the possibility for
assimilation of hazardous wastes at such
landfill disposal sites is being addressed
by simulated codisposal investigations at
the Georgia Institute of Technology.
     The information presented and
discussed herein is a summary of research
progress into the mechanisms controlling
and defining loading capacities and
impacts on the jLri situ processes of waste
stabilization when influenced by single
pass leaching or leachate recycle in
landfills.  Therefore, comprehensive gas
and leachate analyses have been scheduled
over a three-year project period.  From
these analyses, early results on"the
variations in leachate mercury and lead,
as well as measurable organic priority
pollutants, are used to typify stabiliza-
tion trends and reveal the complexity of
the landfill environment and its inherent
ability to accommodate and attenuate toxic
loadings.
                                          -26-

-------
MATERIALS AND METHODS             . .

Column Design and Operation

     The ten simulated landfill  columns
were designed in pairs with  the  operation-
al features illustrated in Figure 1.   Each
column was  constructed of two  0.9-m'diame-
ter steel sections, with a total height of
3.0 m.  Five of the columns  were designed
to operate  with single pass  leaching,
whereas the other five were  designed to
facilitate  leachate collection and recycle.
All columns were provided with appropriate
appurtenances and were sealed  gas-tight
after  loading.
                     QAS METES
                     TEMPEFUTtJSE INDICATOR
                     QAS SAMPLS.O VALVE
                     GAS TRAP
                     CHECK VALVE
                     PRESSURE GUAGE
                     DISTRIBUTOR A3M
                     RECVCLE P'JVP
                     FLANGE
                     THSRMOCCL'»LB
                     HOPE LINE*
                     JN-LINE F!!_T=3
                     STEEL
                     LEACHATE 5aAM .
                     LIQUID SAV='_E PCrIT
                     LIQUID '_=*=•_ CONTROL
                     GRAVEL. SA.-.3, AMD
                    13 GSO'rEXTH-S. SA,'iO.
                     GEOTEXTH.E. AND CRAVE!
                     LAYESS
                    13 110 V AC
                    20 MOV AC
                     TO PUf.tP
                    21 110 V AC P?3M
                     LIQUID LE'/ = _ CONTROL

                    22 VEflT TO ATVOSrHERE
                    23 SH3EODEO ==?USE
                    03ALL VALVE
                                   SINGLE ?ASS UNIT
   Figure  1.   Simulated landfill  columns.
      The pair  of single pass and  recycle
 control columns were loaded with  shredded
 municipal  refuse only, whereas  the remain-
 ing four pairs of test columns  were loaded
 with selected  organic priority  pollutants
 codisposed with shredded municipal refuse.
 Three  pairs of these latter test  columns
 also received  incremental  loadings of
 toxic  heavy metals'in the  form  of alkaline
 metal  finishing waste treatment sludge
 spiked with additional heavy metals.  The
 loading levels for .the 'simulated landfill
 columns are indicated in Table  1.

      After loading and sealing  had been
 completed, tap water was added  to bring
 each column to indicated field  capacity
 and  initiate the immediate production of
 leachate  for recycle and/or analysis.
Thereafter,  water was added at  a rate of
six liters per week for the single pass
columns and  similarly to the  recycle
columns until sufficient leachate had
accumulated  to accommodate recycle and
analysis  schedules.

Leachate  and Gas Analysis

     Once leachate was generated from each
of the ten columns, a comprehensive analy-
tical program was established for the
common indicator parameters as  indicated
in Table  2.   For the purposes of this

   TABLE  2.   LEACHATE AND GAS MONITORING
           '   PARAMETERS AND METHODS
Measurement
Conductivity
PH
Alkalinity
01", SOs"2,
P0,f3, s-2
HH3-N
OHP
BODg
COD
TOO
CHij/C02/H2
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
potassium
Sodium
Zinc
Lithium
Solid Waste
Calorific Value
Solid Waste
Moisture
Volatile
Organic Acids
Reference
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 120.1
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 150.1
EPA 600/11-79-020
Method 310.1
Standard Methods
Method 129
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 350.3
ASTM Method 1198-99
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 105.1
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 110.1
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 115.1
Gas Chromatography
EPA 600/1-79-020
Methods 213.1 & 213.2
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 215.1
EPA 600/1-79-020 :
Methods 218.1 & 218.2
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 236.1
EPA 600/1-79-020
Methods 239.1 1 239.2
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 212.1
EPA 600/1-79-020
Methods 213.1 4 213.2 ,
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 215.1
EPA 600/1-79-020
Methods 219.1 & 219.2
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 258.1
EPA 600/1-79-020
Method 273.1
EPA 600/1-79-020
Methods 289.1 & 289.2
Standard Methods
Method 317B
Parr Instruments
Tech. Manual J130
Ohaus Instruments
Tech. . Manual
Direct Aqueous
Injection capillary
Column G.C.
Std. Dev.
±6*
±0.1 SU
±5% '
±10*
±5*
-
±20*
±10*
±10*
±5*
not
±5*
±10*
±10*
±10*
±5*
±10*
±20*
±10*
±5*
±5*
±101
±5*

15*
±10*
Accuracy
95-1 05 J
±0.1 SU
95-105*
90-110*
90-110*
-
-
90-110*
90-110*
90-110*
90-110*
90-110*
90-110*
'90-110*
, 90-110*
90-110*.
90-110*
80-120*
90-110*
90-110*
90-110*
90-110*
95-105*
, - -
90-110*
90-110*
                                              -27-

-------
                 TABLE 1.  LOADING LEVELS FOR SIMULATED LANDFILL COLUMNS
        Loading
Shredded Municipal
Refuse, kg (dry)

Priority Organic
Pollutants, g

  Dioctyl phthalate
  1 , E.'l-Triohlorobenzene
  Dibrcmomethane
  Llndane
  Hexachlorobenzene
  2,4-Dlchlorophenol
  2-Nitrophenol
  1,4-Dichlorobenzene
  Naphthalene
  Dieldrin
  Nitrobenzene
  Trlchloroethene

Priority Inorganic
Pollutants, g
                      Column Identity
                           1(CR) 2(C) 3(0) 4(OL) 5(OM) 6(OR) 7(OLR) 8(OH) 9(OMR)  10(OHR)
267   26?  267  267   267   267   267    267   267     267
           120
           120
           120
           120
           120
           120
           120
           120
           120
           •30
           120
           120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
"30
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
-30
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
'30
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
"30
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
•30
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
•30
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
"30
120
120
Cadmium
Chromium
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
- 26
- 45
20
- 39
- 101
- -45
.1
:3
:3
:7
:9
:7
52
90
40
79
209
91
.3
;6
;6
;4
;8
:4
26
45
20
39
104
- '45
.1
:3
.'3
.'7
:9
:7
104.6
181 ;2
-81 ;2
158:8
41 9. '6
182;8
52
90
40
79
209
91
.3
;6
:6
;4
;8
;4
104.6
181; 2
•81. -2
158. '8
419:6
182:8
 Letters in parentheses indicate control (C) or recycle (R)  columns;  organic (0)
 loadings; and, low (L), moderate (M) or high (H) inorganic  loadings.
presentation, the protocols established
for the determination of leachate heavy
metals, selected anions, ORP, pH and
conductivity were of particular interest
with the latter analysis being used to
estimate the influence of ionic strength
and activity on solubility or complexation
equilibria.

     In the case of the selected organic
priority pollutants, leachate samples were
spiked with surrogate compounds and
extracted for four hours with methylene
chloride using a continuous vapor phase
procedure.  After drying over anhydrous
sodium sulfate and concentration to a
volume of 1.0 to 4.0 mL in a Kuderna-
Danish apparatus, the samples were
analyzed by capillary column gas
ohromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
using an internal standard.  Results were
                    validated by a number of quality assurance
                    quality control (QA/QC) procedures,
                    including analysis of duplicate samples,
                    spiked samples and blanks.   In addition,
                    calibration curves were developed for each
                    set of samples using serial dilutions of
                    standard solutions.

                         For those organic compounds capable
                    of being transferred by volatilization or
                    stripping to the gas phase, gas traps
                    containing 2 to 2.5 g of Tenax adsorbent
                    resin were inserted into the gas collec-
                    tion systems of each simulated landfill
                    column.  These traps were removed periodi-
                    cally and the organics desorbed by heating
                    at 150°C for two to four minutes. The
                    desorbed organic compounds  were trans-
                    ferred directly to a capillary column and
                    measured by GC-MS.
                                          -28-

-------
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
                                        Changes in Selected Heavy Metals
     As indicated previously, this presen-
tation will focus on the behavior and fate
of selected priority pollutants as the
landfill columns progressed through the
initial phases of landfill stabilization.
Accordingly, as has been described in
detail elsewhere (1), current operation of
the columns has been intentionally main-
tained in the acid formation phase, as
indicated by the low pH and high chemical
oxygen demand (COD) and total volatile
acids (TVA) concentrations illustrated in
Figure 2.  This operational condition is
necessary to assess the effects and
implications of the test loadings during a
period when the leachate is most aggres-
sive and mobility generally most enhanced.
                                             Based upon a fundamental understand-
                                        ing of the reactivity of the various heavy
                                        metals within the landfill environment
                                        (2), mercury (Hg) and lead (Pb), were
                                        selected as a focus for this presentation.
                                        Accordingly, the two most significant
                                        inorganic anions capable of affecting the
                                        mobility of these metals were sulfate
                                        (S0ij=) and chloride 
-------
3000.
2000.
1000.
3000. :
2000.
1000.
   0.
     0.
                                            500
      100.     200.     300.     400.
         Time since loading,  days
Figure 3.  Leachate sulfate  concentra-
           tions for recycle and single
           pass landfill columns.
                                                     o.
-600,
            100.     200.     300.     400.
               Time since loading, days

     Figure 5.   Leachate ORP for recycle and
                single pass landfill columns.
                                            500
          TOO.     200.     300.     400.
             Time since loading, days
   Figure 4.  Leachate chloride concentra-
              tions for recycle and  single
              pass landfill columns.


tracer, also decreased with time.   In
searching for a  cause for such a'decrease,
possible mechanisms influencing removal of
Pb and Hg included complexation and preci-
pitation and reduction of sulfate  to
sulfide under the anaerobic conditions
prevailing within each landfill column.

     As indicated in Figure 5, the likeli-
hood of reduction of sulfates to sulfides
was reinforced by the presence of  reducing
conditions characterized by negative redox
potentials (ORP).  Since sulfides  serve as
potent precipitating agents for most heavy
metals, their presence in even very low
levels will control metal solubilities.
Moreover, ORP is significant in determin-
ing the chemical state of heavy metals,
their potential  for reaction and their
ultimate mobility.

     The perturbations in the figure indi-
cate that ORP is a procedure and condition
sensitive analysis which frequently
measures only trends rather than absolute
potentials.  It  is affected by the medium
within which the measurement is made and
by external influences during sampling and
                                                                                            500
                                             -30-

-------
 analysis.  Exposure to air, contamination
 of electrode surfaces, and non-homogeneous
 mixing all tend to hinder absolute measure-
 ments and often cause irregularities  in
 determination.  Nevertheless, the consis-
 tently negative ORP values were  sufficient-
 ly indicative of reducing conditions  to
 allow the presumptive diagnosis  that
 follows.

      Similar difficulties were encountered
 with the absolute measurement of sulfide
 due to fouling of the electrode  surface.
 Moreover, during this period of  investiga-
 tion, sulfide levels were often  below
 detectable concentrations and were also
 Influenced by reaction with the  heavy
 metals.

      In terms of the two heavy metals
 chosen for discussion here, mercury
 solubility and speciation can be subject
 to a complex array of factors including
 reduction, precipitation and complexation.
 Although the mercury was added in the form
of mercuric compounds, reduction to
mercurous ion or to metallic mercury could
occur under conditions of relatively low
ORP.  Moreover, unlike the other heavy
metals loaded into the columns mercury
shares with lead the propensity to form
sparingly soluble chlorides, sulfldes and
sulfates.  Sulfide forms very sparingly
soluble precipitants with both mercuric
and mercurous ions and can control mercury
solubility even if present in below
detectable levels.  Likewise, mercuric ion
is subject to moderately strong complexa-
tion by chloride and, in the presence of
existing leachate chloride levels (Figure
4), the neutral complex, HgCl2, would be
the overwhelmingly dominant soluble
species of divalent mercury.

     To inspect the behavior of mercury as
landfill stabilization progressed with
time, leachate mercury concentrations have
been plotted in Figures 6 and 7 on both
normal and expanded scales, respectively.
The expanded scale plot was necessary to'
2000. -
           100.     200.     300.     400.
              Time since loading, days
                                           500
         Figure 6.  Leachate Hg concentrations
                    for recycle and single pass
                    landfill columns.
           200.        300.        400.
            Time since loading, days

   Figure 7.  Leachate Hg concentrations
              for recycle and  single pass
              landfill columns  (expanded
              scale).
                                                                                         500
                                            -31-

-------
compare the dissolved mercury levels when
leachate mercury concentrations had become
very low.  Examination of these figures
indicates that, following the initial
elevated levels of leachate mercury for
the six spiked columns, the concentration
decreased rapidly to levels generally
below 50 pg/L.

     To help explain this behavior, a
pC-pE diagram for the Hg+2/HgCl2/Hg°
system at pH 5.2 is presented in Figure 8.
The component equilibria suggest that, af
the negative redox potentials and acid pH
conditions prevailing in the landfill
columns, the mercuric compounds added will
be reduced to metallic mercury.  This
finding is consistent with other reports
of metallic mercury in water at concentra-
tions of 20 to 1)0 ug/L (3,1)), and is of
major significance in determining eventual
fate, including the possibility of volati-
lization, particularly when methane
fermentation with gas stripping prevails.
                 pCI



14-
H-
P« u-
H.
u-
u-
II-
c


*
H«C1,









Hg"



Hg'


0

•1100
•1000

•BOO "'
r mV
Uaoo
•100




•94fi
•74B

•B45
-64S
-44S
•346

     Figure 8.  pC-pE diagram for
              •  Hg*2/HgCl2/Hg°
                system at pH 5.2.
     Lead, the other heavy metal selected
for analysis here, contrasts with mercury
in that it will be expected to remain in
the divalent state under current operating
conditions.  This state subjects lead to
two significant reactions which control
its solubility.  First, lead is suscepti-
ble to precipitation as sulfide, sulfate
or chloride.  Secondly, while not as prone
to form very strong complexes as the
ionized forms of mercury, lead will form
such complexes with sulfate and chloride
and will thereby tend to increase lead
solubility beyond that otherwise predicted
by simple dissolution.  Moreover, if there
is a preference for reduction to metallic
mercury, then in the absence of mercury
ions, lead will preferentially react with
sulfide over the other heavy metals loaded
into the columns.

     To associate these concepts with an
interpretation of changes in leachate lead
concentrations, Figure 9 indicates that
initial high lead levels decreased rapidly
and then tended to increase again, particu-
larly in the most heavily loaded columns.
A possible explanation of these changes  '
could be predicated on two considerations.
First, sulfide, even at very low concentra-
tions, would be the primary precipitant
for lead.  Secondly, if sulfide is absent,
either sulfate or chloride will function
as the reacting anions.
                                        500
        100.     200.     300.     400.
           Time since loading, 'days
  Figure  9.   Leachate Pb concentrations
             for recycle and single  pass
             landfill columns.
     Based on known solubility equilibria
(5,6), a'predominance area diagram has
been constructed in Figure 10 for the
important lead species under the
prevailing pH conditions.  From this
diagram, it is apparent that the solid
                                           -32-

-------
                  pSO,
       Figure 10.  Predominance area
                   diagram for Pb for
                   the recycle and
                   single pass landfill
                   columns.

 species  controlling  lead solubility in the
 absence  of sulfide is PbSOi).   Therefore,
 in consideration of  the  complexity  of
• equilibria for  this  system,  the  low
 leachate lead concentrations are
 reasonably consistent with sulfide  as the
 precipitant anion, while the more recent
 higher concentrations are well within the
 range expected  in the presence of sulfate
 control.

      When coupled with the importance of
 biological mediation, the results suggest
 the possibility of very limited  initial
 sulfate reduction, but of sufficient
 magnitude to control lead solubility.
 Thereafter, possible heavy metal or acid
 inhibition may have retarded further
 generation of sulfide, thereby shifting
 lead solubility control to the sulfate ion.
 As the experiments progress and  methane
 fermentation is initiated with the further
 production of sulfide, solubility control
 for lead may again shift to sulfide.  The
 onset of methane fermentation with its
 concomitment requirements for increasingly
 low redox potentials will also continue to
 sustain mercury in the metallic  state.

 Changes in Organic Priority Pollutants

      Although the results of analyses on
 the organic priority pollutants added to
 the test columns have not yet revealed as
 dramatic an impact on leachate quality,
 the waste mass appears to be influencing
 release consistent with solubility and
 octanol/water partition coefficients  (Kow)
as summarized in Table 3.  Since Kow is a
measure of the tendency of a compound to
partition between water and a hydrophobic
phase, with increasing log Kow indicating
increasing hydrophobicity, each of the
listed compounds could be inspected
relative to their ability to dissolve in
the leachate and to be sorbed by the
refuse mass.  Consequently, the highly
soluble compounds would be expected to
appear rapidly in the leachate at rela-
tively high concentrations, while the less
soluble would tend to be retained.

     To test this hypothesis within the
landfill setting, it was necessary to
inspect the order and intensity of appear-
ance of the organic priority pollutants,
taking into account the position of
loading (near the bottom of each column),
the possibility of volatilization, and the
mode of operation (single pass or recycle).
As indicated in Table 4, all organic
priority pollutants with vapor pressures
greater than 1.9 kPa (Table 3) have been
observed in the gas phase of the columns
at least once.  Gas phase transfer,
although minimal due to low gas evolution
under acid formation conditions, was most
frequently detected for trichloroethene
and dibromomethane.  To assess the
magnitude of this transfer, gas phase
concentrations and masses have been
estimated for these two compounds in Table
5.  Based upon this analysis, gas phase
transfer was not yet considered
significant, but would possibly be more so
when methane fermentation with gas
evolution and stripping of volatile
compounds Is established.

     With respect to the leachate analyses
of Table 6, lindane and dioctyl phthalate
did not appear during the first year of
column operation, whereas the more soluble
trichloroethene and dibromomethane
appeared almost immediately.  However, as
time passed, these latter compounds
eventually disappeared.  In comparison,
the phenolic compounds'(2,4-dichlorophenol
and nitrophenol), although quite soluble,
have been observed only at relatively  low
concentrations.  Similarly, 1,2,4-tri-
chlorobenzene,'with its low solubility and
high log Kow, has been  detected at low
concentrations, whereas naphthalene, being
only moderately soluble and fairly
hydrophobic, consistently appeared at  low
to moderate concentrations.
                                           -33-

-------
        TABLE 3.  PHYSICAL-CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
Organic Compound
Molecular
Weight
Aqueous Solubility
mg/L
1,1, 2-Trichloroethene
Dibroraoraethane
1 , H-Dichlorobenzene
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
Naphthalene
2,1-Dichlorophenol
1 ,2,1-Trichlorobenzene
Lindane
Dieldrin
Dioctyl phthalate
Hexaohlorobenzene
131.4
173:9
147:0
123:1
139:1
128:2
163:0
181 ;5
290:9
381 ;0
391:0
284:8
1,100
11,700
•• 49
1,900
2,100
•26.2
4,500-
19
17
•0.1
0:285
0:11
(20°C)
(15°C)
(22°C)
(20°C)
(20°C)
(20°C)
(20°C)
(22°C)
(24°C)

(24°C)
(24°C)
Log Octanol/
Water
Partition
Vapor Pressure Coefficient,
at 100°, kPa
150
101
• 8.1
3:3
2:54
2:5
1:9
3:3
0:17
2.39 x 10~5 (25°C)
0:0002
133'(114.4°C)
Knw
2.29
1:45
3:38
1:85
1:76
3:37
2:75
4:04
3^72
>5:6
5:2
5:61
Adapted from Verschueren (7).
      TABLE 4.  FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS IN GAS TRAPS
Organic Compound
Frequency of Detection
                                                      Samples
                                                                                Percent
1 ,1 , 2-Trichloroethene
Dibromomethane
2, i|-Dichlorophenol
2-Nitrophenol
Nitrobenzene
1 , l|-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobenzene
Lindane
Dieldrin
Dioctyl phthalate
44
32
25
13
10
22
1
14
•3
ND
ND
ND
92
67
52
27
21
46
2
29
6
0
0
0
ND • Not detected.
*Total of 18 samples from gas traps obtained throughout experiments to Day 400.,
                                          -34-

-------
     TABLE 5.  SUMMARY OF GAS PHASE TRANSFER OF TRICHLOROETHENE AND DIBROMOMETHANE
Trichloroethene
Landfill
Column*
KCR)
2(0
3(0)
MOD
5(OM)
6(OR)
• 7(OLR)
8(OH)
9(OMR)
10(OHR)
Average Con- Range of
centration, Concentration,
ppb ppb
6.48
0;49
135' '
764
385
137
247
267
378
757
BDL
BDL
' 6.25
585
10.3
13:8
58;7
55 :1
87; 6
12;3
- 39.1
- 2.53
- 820
- 958
- 1250
- 878
- 903
- 607
-1182
- 3500
Total Mass
Volatized,
Ug
300
6
3,800
2,600
4,000
1,500
- 720
2,160
2,020
8,900
Dibromomethane
Average Con- Range of
centration, Concentration,
ppb ppb
0
0
0.81
18:2-
•5:1
57"
71
2.0
0;88
0:33


BDL
BDL.
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
BDL
_
—
- 4.85
- 91.2
- 26;2
- 238
- 354
- 8.54
- 4;52
- .86
Total Mass
Volatized,
yg
0
0
22
82
71
830
280
21
6
5
 As  on Table 1.
                 TABLE 6.   ELUTION ORDER FOR ORGANIC PRIORITY POLLUTANTS
First Day Observed
Compound in Leachate
Single Pass
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethene
Dibromomethane
Nitrobenzene ,
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
2 , 4-Dichlorophenol
Naphthalene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Dioctyl phthalate
Lindane
Hexachlorobenzene
Dieldrin
29
29
29
29
36
36
36
54
64
64
410
ND
Maximum Concentration
Final Day Observed Observed in Leachate,
in Leachate mg/L
Recycle Single Pass
29
29
29
36
36
36
. 36
43
64
111
389
ND
*
478
239a
85b
288a
*
*
»
400
410
410
ND
Recycle Single Pass Recycle
*
453
260d
85°
288e
*
x
*
473
*
453
ND
16
•3
26
5
11
15
'7
0.8
2'
0.5
. 0.-15

14
•5
28
6
2
2
1
0.9
1 '
0.3
0;2

ND = Not detected.
*Currently present.
aObserved in leachate from two columns subsequently.
^Reappeared in leachate on Day 260.         ,
°Reappeared in leachate on Day 355:
dReappeared in leachate on Day 370'and after Day 480.
eReappeared in leachate on Day 488.
                                          -35-

-------
     Although it is difficult to establish
potential attenuation mechanisms for the
organic priority pollutants in terms of
physical-chemical and/or biologically
mediated interactions, all have now
appeared in the leachates from the test
columns and some notion of elution order
can be established.  Combining the data of
Table 3 with those of Table 6 suggests
that Kow is a useful parameter for
establishing elution patterns.  Hence, all
compounds with log Kow values of 3.4 or
lower were present in the leachate no
later than Day 36, between Days 40 and 120
for log Kow ranging from 3-7 and 5.2,' and
at Day ^00 or longer for log Kow in excess
of 5.6.  Additional examination of these
elution patterns will be necessary to
provide a more comprehensive understanding
of these changes and the possible
influences of a transition from acid
formation to methane fermentation under
either single pass or recycle operations.
The opportunity for reinjection of leached
compounds for repartitioning or possible
extended attenuation in the case of the
recycle columns is expected to account for
some of the alternating elution patterns
detected.

CONCLUSIONS

     Preliminary analyses of results from
investigations on the codisposal of
priority pollutants with municipal refuse
in simulated landfill columns, operated
under the influence of single pass
leaching or leachate recycle, have begun
to suggest possible attenuating mechanisms.
The removal of heavy metals is strongly
influenced by the loading intensity, the
physical and chemical characteristics of
the admixed waste and leachate transport
medium, the progress of microbially
mediated stabilization, and the presence
and availability of inhibitors and/or
reactive species.

     The reducing environment helps to
determine metal speciation and reaction
potential in terms of possible precipita-
tion or complexation.  Metallic mercury is
the suggested form of that metal, with a
potential for release through the leachate
or gas phases.  Sulfur species are impli-
cated as controlling lead mobility either
through precipitation or complexation.
The distribution of oxidized or reduced
sulfur is determined by the opportunity
for biologically mediated reduction which
may be itself inhibited by the heavy metal
loadings, acid pH conditions and unfavora-
ble redox potentials.  These contingencies
should become more evident as the results
of the heavy metal loadings are compared
under the succeeding methane fermentation
phase of landfill stabilization.

     The impact of the simulated landfill
conditions on the release or possible
attenuation of the organic priority
pollutants remains uncertain, but several
logical patterns are beginning to emerge.
Solubility and/or reaction in the waste or
leachate and gas transport media in
accordance with physical-chemical proper-
ties is somewhat predictable, log octanol/
water partition coefficient being particu-
larly useful.  Alternating periods of
appearance and disappearance of organic
priority pollutants in the leachate or gas
may reflect flow patterns established by
single pass or recycle operations as well
as the potential for physical-chemical
partitioning and possible bioattenuation.
As the microbially mediated processes of
landfill stabilization become more
actively established under the ensuing
methane fermentation phase, the effect of
the imposition of the loadings and the
most probable assimilative mechanisms will
become clearer.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The research described in this
article has been funded wholly or in part
by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency through Cooperative
Agreement No. CR 812158, to the Georgia
Institute of Technology.  It has been
subject to the Agency's review and
approved for publication.  Approval does
not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policy of the
Agency, nor does mention of commercial
products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.  Technical
guidance from the Project Officer,
Jonathan G. Herrmann, is gratefully
acknowledged.

REFERENCES

1.  Pohland, F. G. and S. R. Harper.
    Critical Review and Summary of
    Leachate and Gas Production from
    Landfills.  U.S. EPA Cooperative
    Agreement CR809997.
                                          -36-

-------
7.
Pohland, F. G., J.  P. Gould, R.  E.
Ramsey, B. J. Spiller and W. R.
Esteves.  Containment of Heavy Metals
in Landfills with Leachate Recycle.
In:  Proceedings of the Seventh Annual
Research Symposium, Land Disposal:
Municipal Solid Waste.
EPA-600/9-8l-002a.   Philadelphia., PA,
March 1981 , p. 179.

Hughes, W. L.  A Physicochemical
Rationale for the Biological Activity
of Mercury and Its Compounds.  .Annals
of New York Acad. of Sci., 66, H5^,
1957.   '

Mercury in the Environment, Chapter 3-
L. Frlberg and J. Vostal, eds.  CRC
Press, Cleveland, OH, 1972.

Sillen, L. G.  and A. E. Martell.
Stability Constants  of Metal-Ion
Complexes.   Special  Publication No.  17
of the  Chem.  Soc., London,  1964, 1150
pp.

Sillen, L. G.  and A. E. Martell.
Stability Constants  of Metal-Ion
Complexes.   Special  Publication No.  25
of the Chem.  Soc., London,  1971,
839  pp.

Verschueren,  K.  Handbook of  Environ-
mental Data  on Organic Chemicals,  2nd
Ed.   Van  Nostrand,  1983-
                                       -37-

-------
                  FIELD VERIFICATION OF FMLS--ASSESSMENT  OF AN UNCOVERED
                  UNREINFORCED 60-MIL EPDM LINER AFTER 18  YEARS OF EXPOSURE

                   Henry E. Haxo, Jr., Robert S.  Haxo,  Gary L. Walvatne
                                       Matrecon,  Inc.
                                Alameda, California  94501
                                         ABSTRACT

      Samples  of a 60-mil vulcanized ethylene propylene rubber (EPDM)  flexible membrane
 liner (FML) were recovered for  analysis  and physical  testing from different locations
 within a basin that was being decommissioned after 18 years of service as an emergency
 pond for "red-water."   Observations on  the  in-place uncovered liner, description of the
 sampling procedure  and  collection of the  samples, and  results of the laboratory testing
 of the samples  are  presented.

      The properties of  the liner samples  varied significantly depending on the location
 in the basin  from  which they were taken.   Samples taken  from  the liner on  the  dike
 slope facing  south had  less  extractables (i.e., oily plasticizers) and  generally  had
 higher tensile  strength  and modulus than  the reference FML.  The samples taken from  the
 liner on the bottom  of the basin  had  high extractables and properties  comparable  to
 those of the  reference.  As no retained sample or analytical and  physical test data  on
 the  original  unexposed  sheeting  were  available  for  comparison,  data  on  a   1972  EPDM
 liner were used for reference.

       No  failures  were  observed  in the factory  seams  of the in-place  liner.   Most  of
 the  field seams on  the  slopes opened, resulting in sloughing of the liner. Those  field
 seams that  were  high  on the slope  showed  an apparent  increase  in crosslinks of  the
 adhesive; however, the adhesive retained  tack in most  of the tested  field seams,
 indicating low cure.

      Rodents  had  gnawed holes in  the liner  from the  top  surface  in  the upper  slope
 areas.   There  was  no  indication  that  the   rodents  had  burrowed below the  liner  and
 gnawed  from beneath the  liner.  The design of the anchor trench using  wooden  planks  was
 unsatisfactory, as many of the panels of sheeting  pulled out.
INTRODUCTION

     Considerable laboratory test data
have been generated over the past several
years  with  respect to  the  properties of
FMLs and their chemical  compatibility with
hazardous liquids and  waste  liquids.  Such
data  are continually  being  generated in
research and  in  EPA  9090 liner/waste
compatibility tests.   On  the other hand,
the data that are available  on the effects
on FMLs  in  service in waste containment,
particularly data in the open literature,
are limited.   Several  studies  have been
undertaken  by the  EPA to assess  liners
that  have  been  removed  from  service
(Roberts  et  al,  1983; Nelson et  al,
1985; Emcon  Associates,  1983;  Matrecon,
1983); however,  these studies  are  rel-
atively few  in  number and  the exposures
are  limited,  both  with  respect  to
length of service  and severity of ex-
posure.   Much more information on the
field performance  of lining materials
in  service  needs  to be  obtained  and
analyzed  in order  to develop correla-
tion  between  laboratory  test   data
and  actual   performance.  Such  data are
                                         -38-

-------
also needed  to  set criteria for  perfor-
mance  or magnitude of  the changes  in
properties that will  affect  performance.
These  criteria  are needed  for  use  in
assessing the results  of EPA 9090  liner
compatibility tests.

     An  opportunity arose  to assess  the
effects  on  an EPDM liner of 18  years  of
exposure in a surface impoundment when  an
Emergency "Red-water" Basin located at the
Joliet  Army  Ammunition  Plant in  Joliet,
Illinois, was scheduled  to  be  decommis-
sioned.   Arrangements  were  made  through
the  Hazardous Waste  Engineering  Research
Laboratory  of EPA in  Cincinnati for
Matrecon to observe some of the cleanup of
the  basin  and the removal of the lining
material, and to  collect samples of the
EPDM liner which had been in  service under
relatively mild conditions that may not be
typical of  most  landfills  or   surface
impoundments.

     The objective of the  work was  to
assess  the  overall condition of the
uncovered unreinforced FML after  18 years
of  exposure to  the waste liquid  and
weather, and  to assess the overall condi-
tion  of the  basin below  the EPDM liner.

     This  paper  presents a description
of  the basin at the  time  of sampling, a
description  of the  sampling procedure,
observations made during  the  sampling
of  the  liner,  and  the  results of the
laboratory testing  of  the exposed  samples.

DESCRIPTION OF THE BASIN  AND  THE  LINER

      The basin was  constructed  in late
 1967 and early  1968 to act as  a  surge
pond  for "red water"  produced  as a  waste
from  TNT production.  The pond covered an
area  of 3.1 acres and  contained  "red
water"  waste liquid, which was usually
concentrated by  evaporation  and  then
disposed of by  incineration.  It must be
recognized  that  the composition of the
 wastewater  that  was contained  was  highly
 variable with time as the basin  was used
 intermittently.    The  constituent con-
 centration  for  selected  analytes from a
 sample  collected  on May  28,   1981  is
 presented in  Table 1.

      The basin  was last  used  during  TNT
 production  for  the Viet  Nam war and  was
 dismantled  in May  -1985,  because  it  was no
    TABLE  1.  COMPOSITION OF SURFACE
             WATER SAMPLED

                               Concen-
                               tration
           Analyte              (pg/L)

TNT-Related Organics Compounds
  2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT)     <0.29
  2,6-Dinitrotoluene (DNT)        196.0
  2,4-Dinitrotoluene (DNT)         1.00
  2-Nitrotoluene                   5.7
  1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene            <2.2
Anions
  Nitrite
  Nitrate
  Sulfate
  Phosphate
     <250
  433,000
6,690,000
      390
Heavy Metals
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium (hexavalent)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury

<13.0
8.8
1.5
125.0
141.0
5,360.0
40.2
195.0
<0.35
aSample number:  SW109; sample date:
 May 28, 1981.

 Source: Tom Erdman  of the Joliet Army
 Ammunition Plant.
 longer needed.    The capacity of  the
 basin  was  4.06  million  gallons.   It had
 an  average  depth  of about  5 ft, and the
 dike slope was  3:1.  The  liner  was an
 unreinforced EPDM  FML of 60-mil nominal
 thickness.   It was  uncovered,  that is,
 no  soil cover was  placed  on  the liner.
 Figures  1  and  2 present  a  panaromic
 view from  the southeastern  corner of
 the basin  at  the time  the  liner was
 being  sampled.    The  water  table  in the
 area appeared  to  have  been about the
 same as that  of the basin bottom as a
 partially-filled water drainage ditch
 ran  along  the  outside   of  the  dike
 on  the  north and the east sides.

      Most  of the  field  seams  along the
 basin slopes failed, but, from  what  could
                                         -39-

-------
Figure 1.   Part 1 of  the  panoramic  view of the basin at
           the time liner  samples  were collected.  View
           is from the southeastern corner of the basin.
           Note the  sloughing from  the liner  and the
           hosing  of  the  sludge to  maintain  its slurry
           consistency to  make it easy to pump.



Figure 2.  Part 2 of  the  panoramic view of the basin at
           the  time  the  liner samples  were  collected.
           View is  from the  southeastern  corner  of the
           basin.   Note the anchor trench  failure  and the
           field seam failures.
                           -40-

-------
be  observed  of the  basin  bottom,  the
field  seams were mostly intact; we  did
not observe a single  failure  of  the fac-
tory seams.  (Figure 3 shows a partially-
opened field seam on the  slope.)
 Figure 3.   Partially-opened  field se.ajn  or,
            the  '.slope.   Note  the  apparent
            tension, and shrink.ag.e away, from
            the  seam.  Nearby factory,seams
            are  intact.
      The anchor' trench along the berm top
 was  completely 'inadequatel  for  anchoring
 (Figure 4) the top of"the.liner.  In com-
 bination  with the  failure of  the  field
 seams,  this poor  anchorage "resulted in
 large  sections of  the basin slopes not
 being covered by  the liner.   The extent of
 failure of  the FML  is  documented  in the
 site  photographs  (Figures 1, 2,  and 5).

      Gas  generation  below the  liner re-
 sulted in the formation of "whales" or
 areas  of  the liner  which lifted  off the
 floor of the basin.   No means for bleeding
off the gas appeared to have been incor-
porated  into the pond  design.   It  was
reported that these  "whales"  were punc-
tured  to  release trapped gases  shortly
before  the  liner sampling  was  started.
An  attempt  had been  made  earlier  to
relieve  the  trapped gases  by attaching
vent pipes to the liner, but these vents
appear to have been  ineffective.

     The bulk of the liquid in the basin
had been removed before the sampling was
started and the cleanup of  the  sludge
(which was  drying) was  underway.   By
dragging a  sled across the  bottom,  the
sludge  could  be  kept wet  (Figures 1 and
2)  so  that  it  could be  handled,  as  a
slurry.   It was   also felt that  the
residual TNT in  the  sludge would be less
active when wet.

SAMPLING OF LINERS  FOR TEST

     For  assessing   the  overall   effects
of  exposure  and aging on the properties
of  an  exposed liner from a  lined  surface
impoundment,  it is  desirable  to obtain
samples that have been exposed to  a range
of  conditions from  the  mildest condition
that  is believed  to  exist  in  a given
impoundment  to  that believed to  be the
most  severe exposure  (Nelson   et  al,
1985).   To  meet these requirements, we
tried  to:

     •  Obtain  a  2-ft  wide   "strip"
         sample  that  extended from the
         anchor  trench down  the slope and
         onto  the bottom of the  impound-
         ment.   The  location  should  be on
      ;   the  north  side, facing south.
         This sample would  yield  suf-
         ficient  material  for  testing the
         principal areas  of  exposure  that
         a  liner would encounter in an
         impoundment,  from the top to the
         bottom.

      •  Collect  several samples   of  fac-
         tory and field seams.

 >'  : •  In  addition  to  the  "strip"
         sample,  collect   samples of
         the completely submerged  liner
         with seams, particularly at  the
         lowest  point of the liner,  e.g.,
         the  sump area.

      •  Collect any  samples  that showed
         abnormal exposure or other  ab-
         normalities.
                                          -41-

-------
Figure 4.   Anchor  trench construction.   This  photograph
           shows the top of Sample A immediately prior  to
           cutting.
Figure 5.  Failure  of  the  anchor  trench  due  to  the
           pullout of the membrane.
                           -42-

-------
     Four major  liner  samples were  ob-
tained and were designated  Samples  A,  B,
C, and  D.   In  addition,  seven  smaller
samples  containing  holes,  apparently
caused by  rodents,  were also collected
(Figure  6).

     The reason  why each  of the  major
samples  was taken  are  discussed  briefly
below:

     •  Sample A was  the major  sample
        from  this liner.   It was  taken
        from  the  northeastern  dike
        (southern  exposure)   and  extended
        from the  anchor trench at  the  top
       of  the dike, down the dike,  and
       on to the basin  bottom.  A factory
       seam extended most  of  the sample
       length  and  a field  seam  extended
       into the  bottom  section.  Due  to
       its size,  the  strip  was cut into
       three  sections.   The schematic
       drawing  (Figure  7) shows the
       different sections  and areas from
       which  test  specimens  were  drawn.
       The drawing  also shows the  seams
       and  the  locations  that  were
       tested.
     •  Sample B included  a field  seam
        which  was partly  intact  and
        partly failed.  It  was taken from
        the northeastern  dike  between
        Sample A and the northeast corner
        of the basin.

     •  Sample C was   from  the  basin
        bottom.   Before collection,  it
        was covered with very wet sludge
        and exposed to very wet mud  on
        the underside.  A small strip cut
        from the liner adjacent to Sample
        C  was collected for volat.iles
        determination.

     •  Sample D included  a  partly
        intact/partly   failed  field  seam
        from a "whale."   Sample D  was
        chosen  because  "whales" are
        considered to be sites of stress
        on the  liner  and because of the
        presence of a  field  seam.

The  locations  where  the  samples  were
collected  are  shown in  Figure 8,  a
simplified  drawing  based  on  the  "as
built" drawing of the  basin.
              Figure 6.  Holes gnawed by  rodents in  the  liner  at  the
                        top  of the  slope.    The  1 and  2 refer  to
                        samples cut  from  the liner.
                                       -43-

-------
             Seam test
            .area
p&l^JI
~*X*X*X*X*X*X*Xv
            - Factory
             seam
          mmsmm
          %iiA1-3^!;

            - Factory
             seam
    r-~.'v.'v.;rr.~
              *A2-5i:
          tow
         seam  SeaJ,test
              area
            Field
            seam
                        Section buried in
                        the anchor trench
                        Weather-exposed
                        section from the
                        top of the dike
                         Sections exposed
                         alternately to
                         weather and waste
                        Section at the
                        bottom of the
                        dike slope
              Field seam connecting
              panels on the dike
              slope and the basin
              bottom
                         Section from the
                         basin bottom
Figure 7.  Schematic drawing of Sample A,
           a strip  sample  cut  from the
           liner on the northeastern dike
           of the basin.    The  strip ex-
           tended from  the  anchor trench
           down  to  the  bottom of the
           basin.
     No retained sample  of the original
liner was available  for  use as a baseline
reference.  The top portion of Sample A,
which  was  buried  in  the shallow anchor
trench on  top  of  the  dike, probably had
only a modest exposure to either waste or
sun,  but it appeared to  have  aged and
lost  extractables and thus could not be
used as a baseline reference.

     The  temperature  on the day the
samples  were  collected was  in  the
mid-70's.  The weather  varied from  clear
in  the morning,  to cloudy in  the  early
afternoon, to clear  again in  the late
afternoon.

     The samples cut  from  the liner were
kept  as cool  as  possible, particular-
ly  those that were removed  from under
sludge or soil  (i.e.,   from  the anchor
trench)  or had been  below the liquid.
The  samples  were washed without scrub-
bing  to  remove  loose  material,  then
rolled and placed in  aluminum  tubes.   A
small  amount of  water was  added to each
of  the  tubes that  contained  moist
liners and the  tubes  were  sealed at the
ends with metal caps.

TESTING OF SAMPLES

Analytical and Physical'Properties

      The  liner samples  were photographed
and measured at the  laboratory;  Sample A,
the "strip" sample,  was  tested in the
following  areas,  as  shown  in  Figure 7.

     o  Section A1,  the   upper section of
        the  "strip",  was tested in  four
        areas.   Test  areas were  design-
        ated  Samples A1-1, A1r2,  A1-3,
        and  A1-4.    These samples had
        been  exposed   in the  anchor
        trench, at  the  top of  the  slope,
        at mid-slope, and  at  the toe of
        the slope, respectively.

      o  Section A2 was  tested  for ana-
        lyticaland  physical  properties
        in an  area  that had been  at the
        bottom of the  slope.   The test
        area was designated Sample  A2-5.

    o   Section A3,  which  had  been ex-
        posedit"  the   bottom of the
        basin,  was tested for physical
        properties.  The;  test area was
        designated Sample A3-6.
                                         -44-

-------
                                   RODENT HOLES 1 AND 2>
                                RODENT HOLES 3,4 AND 5>
              -80'
                                                                            SAMPLE
                                                                           \  A
                                                                                SAMPLE
                                                                                  B
                       Toe of Dike
                                     FLUME
                                                             Top of Dike
                                                             101  Typical

              Figure 8.  Schematic drawing of the basin showing the  location
                        where, the liner  samples were collected.
The other  three samples  were tested  as
follows:

     •  Sample B, taken  at a  field  seam,
        was tested in two areas designated
        Samples  B1 and B2 which correspond
        to  two  different layers of the
        same sheeting.   Sample B1  was ex-
        posed to the weather  and  possibly
        waste; Sample B2 was the underflap
        part of  the  intact portion of the
        field seam.

     •  Sample C--the  strip  taken ad-
        jacent  to  Sample  C from the
        bottom  of the basin  was  analyzed
        immediately  for  volatiles upon
        receipt  at  the  laboratory.
        Physical  tests  and  additional
        analyses were later  performed  on
        the  main  portion of  Sample  C.

     •  Sample D, cut  from  a  "whale", was
        tested for analytical and physical
        properties and  the intact  part  of
        the seam was  tested  in the peel
        mode.

     The properties  of  the  exposed  FMLs
that  were  measured and the specific
test methods that were used are presented
in  Table 2.   The results of the  testing
are presented in Table 3.
  TABLE 2.   PROPERTIES AND TEST METHODS
     Property
  Test method3
Tensile properties

Tear strength

Puncture resistance


Hardness

Volatiles content

Extractables content


Ash content

Specific gravity

Thermogravimetric
  analysis
ASTM D412

ASTM D624

FTMS 101C,
Method 2065

ASTM D2240

MTM 1

MTM 2 (with methyl
ethyl ketone)

ASTM D297

ASTM D792


Haxo (1983)
aASTM = American Society for Testing and
 Materials;  FTMS = Federal Test Method
 Standard; MTM = Matrecon Test Method
 (Matrecon,  1983).
Seam Strength

     Many of the areas tested for physi-
cal  properties  included factory  or
                                          -45-

-------











z
i
Si
5.
UJ

X


s
>.
W


M

1

i
CC
Q
H-
0
UJ
d
U

UJ




in
0=
5
J


ul
_j
r-4
1
O
VJ

&
UJ
Ul


cc
UJ



.
K\
UJ
r
r—


















.Q
CMS U
r* Q co
CNC_ C
r- UJ ••-*


O ^J
rH
O.BQ

S

cB
CO XI
a o
CD J3


8.1 gb
o a jj a cj
>-f iJ >^ca
Cd *O OB
-< m — i
C Q
o •**
U-

ei ir a. o «-
c xi o >>ca
.*--- r- CO
-J I rH

§VO
1
4J K>
x) > eo
»-t o CL
£ "* t5




c
•"4 $
U xi

3°











X

b
Q.
O
O.
















































































8


t-i
CU
|
O.
rH
CO
u
X)
(-1
ts
5
CO t- CO t-V
t*"\ H
*> *i-f X)
T3 > r-4
a? 03 CO CO
QJ U d
-»H Dl O
0) CD U Q.
rH JJ -H
•H O &? U- rH
JJ CD •«-• CO
CD b - 0 U
rH X) JT CO -H
o x eg o. to
1
lAO OO OO OO VO T— O ON VO CO • P—
fA lA CMO IACM O-3" O T- vo • -^ • • lA
VOIA IAIA rA rA cor- CMCM vo «  3 • N
C C 4-> C ••-• J3
O O CJ -H ^H rH
•H .H C CO CO
•H COCO D.^* (-« oT C
CL J£ C C CD4JCDCCD'o
CO O O -H OCOtjCCXOlOl
- CO rH rH CX C XI **J* C C
^ t-t CO CO CL COrHCOCOCJ<-r-«.H

CO g? 5-5 *< COECDCOCDJZOCaCD
t-t JJ O O JZ -H [-. (-1 JJ (li 0 CD
XI CO O O 4-> CO «4J C 4-> 3 tj t-t
T— CM Ol COtOCOOCOrHQ
4J C CtjCO-H-H-O'O
CD O X> X) CO CO E JJ E E ^ C C
•H CO CO t-t COC3CODI COOO

t— C CO CO CO CO 3CJ-HC-HO CO CD CO
•H Ol CO CO X>-HXOXt— CCOCO
co cr co CD t4 cjx:corHco "oil
C O t-t {-, CO Cr-ELdS tj«-LA
CD rH 4J x> CD 3 CO
i— uj in co i— a. x

to
to
o
• f— t
£ 1
CO
CO t-t
CL CL
o
rH 0
to jj
4- CO
0 C
•H
CL 4->
0
4J rH
E B

t-t W
c»-
C -H
CD
j^ -a
CO CO
CO

rH (0
a

CO CO
C CO
O JJ
•H O
JJ (0
C rH
0) rH
t-t 0
•H O
c
CD CO
C CO
•H XI
111

CD jj ca
x: co c
4J x: -i-1

CD S
XI C_) CD
O -O 0
4-> C -O
CO
T3 CO
CO lA CD
> 1 1— 1
CD CM -H
.H <=C 4_)
rH CO
CD t*- rH
XI O O
CO W
•H CD (-J
rH O
4-1 Q. t*-

CO CD
C 4J
•H rH O
CO rH CD
"b E rH
CO CO O
CJ C
3 O lA
|
JJ n • CM
CO >-. CD <
CD iH C
JJ • CD O 0-
--^ > 4J O
d- lA -H CD
O CO 4-) -i! CO
Ov CJ i-H
C • r- CD rH Q.
O 4J D. >% E
•H C "CO XT CO
CJ rH CO (-t CD
t-> 4J - i-H rH
•H C CD "O X CO
Q O CD XI E
•HOC XI CO
JJ X -H CO
* -H CO CO E CD

IE 0 4->
lA E CO -H C
1 «5 CO SO

>> O CO "0*0
T) E 2: 2 CD Q)
CO (4 C C
> < tj S? -H -H
•H CD fA E CO
(D JJ C CM b JJ
CJ CD -H • CO XI
t-t rH 1 O
O 1 -O TD CO
co n CD c CD
i— I U CO CD S
CL co c f-4
§.c CD a? co a?
JJ f-« fA S CO
CO CD CO • CM
4- (4- • CO CO •
>•. O CD O CO CO CM
[_l f_, r-| rH CM
CO C d- -H XI
C CO CD O JJ CO U-
•H E C CO 4J O
E "O -H CO rH O
• H b i-H CD O CO CO
rH UJ CO 3 > (-( 3
CD CO rH JJ i-H
b • CO CO  o LJ >
CO XI CJ 13 CD
-46-

-------
 field  seams  that  were  tested  for seam
 strength  in shear and  peel modes.   The
 location  and  type of  seam samples that
 were tested  for  seam strength  are  indi-
 cated in Table 4.

      Seam  strength  in  shear  mode  was
 measured in accordance  with ASTM  D882  and
 D3083,  modified  for testing exposed  FMLs.
 Testing  in peel  mode was performed  in
 accordance with ASTM  0413 in  90° peel.
 In  both modes  of  testing,  1-in.  wide
 strip  specimens  were  tested  at  a  jaw
 separation rate  of  2 inches  per  minute.
 The  results  of  the seam testing  are
 presented in Table 4.

 SEAMS

      The seams in the liner were  prepared
 both in the controlled environment of  the
 factory  and  in  the  uncontrolled  outdoor
 environment of  the  field.   Roll stock
 of  EPDM sheeting  was manufactured  and
 fabricated into  large panels  at  the
    factory  that  were  then  installed  in
    the  basin.    Vulcanized  seams were  made
    to join the sheeting  into panels  at the
    factory, while vulcanizable adhesives
    were used  to join the panels  to  form the
    liner in the field.

         The  vulcanized  factory seams ap-
    peared, after exposure to "red water" and
    weather, to  be similar to  new factory
    seams.    The factory  seam  was 3.2-in.
    wide  and the edges of  both   the top and
    bottom  sheets were  beveled  to a thickness
    of about 30 mils  up to 0.75 inches in
    from the edge of  each sheet.   The field
    seam was 6-.in. wide and was bonded with a
    vulcanizable adhesive.  A low-temperature
    vulcanizable  tape  was  placed along the
    edge  of the  top sheet.    In  addition to
    its  function   in  bonding   the  sheets
    together,  the tape  also served  to round
    the edge of  the  top sheet.   However, many
    of the  field seams displayed an  opening
    in the tape along  and  adjacent  to the
    edge  of  the top  sheet.  This opening
                   TABLE 4. SEAM STRENGTH IN SHEAR AND PEEL MODES OF 60-MIL EPDM SEAM SAMPLES
                               COLLECTED FROM THE EMERGENCY "RED-WATER" BASIN
Strip Sample A (type
Anchor Top
trench slope
A1-1 ' A1-2
Seam test (Factory) (Factory)
Seam strength in shear3
Maximum strength^3, ppi
Strength at break, ppi
Locus of break0
FTBd
Non-FTBd

64.0
64.0
0
5 AD
Mid-
slope
A1-3
(Factory)

65.6
65.6
0
5 AD
of seam)
Lower I
slope
A1-4
(Factory)

68.1
68.1
1 SE
, 4 AD

3n basin
bottom
A2-5
(Field) (

69.2
69.2
0
5 AD
High on On basin Top of
slope bottom "Whale"
A3-6 B1/B2 C , D
.Factory) (Field) (Field) (Factory) (Field)

64.4
64.4
0 . ... ...
3 AD
Seam strength in peel6

  Maximum strength, ppi '   11.7      6.5     7.8      8.2
  Locus of break0
   FTBd                   0000
   Non-FTBd             5 AD     5 AD    5 AD     5 AD
        9.2
         0
        5 AD
               10.1
  0
5 AD
  0
5 AD
                            17.6
  0

5 AD
                                     8.7
  0

5 AD
                                            8.9
  0
5 AD
aASTM D882/D3083, modified;  five specimens tested per sample, except where otherwise noted.  Two specimens of Sample B2
 slipped in the clamps during testing; results declared void.

DMaximum value corresponds to tensile strength at break for all specimens tested.
GLocus-of-break determined from the following code:
    Locus of Break
                          Description
Classification
    FT8e
        CL             Break at clamp edge
        SE             Break at seam edge
        BRK             Break in sheeting             FTBe
        AD             Break in adhesion           non-FTBe
dFTB = film-tear bond.

eASTM D413, modified; five specimens tested per sample except where noted otherwise.
                                             -47-

-------
may  have been caused  by  differential
shrink  and  swell of  the  sheeting  and
the adhesive.

SELECTION OF A  BASELINE REFERENCE

     No retained sample of  the  liner was
available that  could be used as a baseline
reference.   The  samples that  were re-
covered  from the  basin  were 18  years of
age; consequently, there was a question as
to whether any of these samples  was suit-
able  for use  as  a baseline reference.
However, we  had data on EPDM FMLs that had
been produced in  1972  and tested in
earlier work performed by Matrecon for the
EPA  on  a study of liners for municipal
solid waste  landfills (Haxo  et  al,  1982;
Haxo et  al,  1985).   A  review of the
analytical results for  an FML produced in
1972 indicated  that it was essentially the
same as that of the liner installed in the
basin in 1967.   A  comparison of analytical
properties of the  1972 EPDM liner with the
liner recovered from the basin is given in
Table 5.   The  data  as  a group constitute
a  fingerprint  of  the liner,  such as  des-
cribed by Haxo  (1983).

     The  physical  properties  for the
1972 membrane  are presented in  Table 3.
Tensile strength, stress at 100,°o elon-
gation,  and  puncture  resistance are
comparable to  the data obtained on the
liner  taken   from the basin,   assuming
somewhat higher  extractables   content.
Using  these  data,  one  has  a   baseline
reference against which to compare the
effects  of  the  exposure  on  the liner
samples recovered  from the basin.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

     Data on  the  samples taken  from the
various sections of  the "strip" sample
can  be  used to assess the  effect  of the
different exposures from  the top to the
bottom  of the  basin.   Some  of  the  basic
conclusions that can be drawn are:

     •  The  extractables  decrease  with
        increasing  distance  from the
        bottom of the basin  which has
        been under "red water" or sludge.

     •  The  sheeting  on the top part of
        the  slope,  which was exposed to
        the  sun,  contains about  one-third
    TABLE 5.  COMPARSION OF  ANALYTICAL
     PROPERTIES OF EXPOSED SAMPLE AND
           BASELINE REFERENCE

                                  1972
                         Goliet    Liner
     Analysis	Sample C   No. 8

Extractables3, %          21.62    23.41

Thermograyimetric
  analysis:

    Polymer + oils, %       57.2     57.4

    Polymer (cal-
      culated)13, %          35.6     34.1
Oil (from extract-
ables), %
Carbon black, %
Ash, %
Total
Ash, K
Specific gravity
21.6
35.2
7.6
100.0
7.24
1.183
23.4
35.0
7.5
100.0
6.78
1.173
aExtractables  consist of oils + extract-
 able curatives and antidegradants
 (determined with methyl ethyl ketone).

^Calculated by subtracting the extract-
 ables from the thermogravimetric analy-
 sis (TGA)  determination for polymer +
 oil.
        less of oily plasticizer than  was
        in the  sheeting on the  floor  of
        the basin.  The  latter  sheeting
        has  the  highest  extractables
        values.   These high values  ap-
        proximated that of the "baseline
        reference" (i.e.,  the  1972  EPDM
        liner).   Also,   the  tensile
        strength,  modulus (stress at 100%
        elongation),  and  puncture  resis-
        tance  values   tend  to increase
        with  decreasing  extractables,
        that is,  with distance up from
        the bottom of the basin,  as  is
        shown  in  Figures 9 through  11.
        On the other  hand, the elonga-
        tion at break decreases  as  the
        extractables  decrease  during  the
        exposure,  as shown in  Figure  12.
                                          -48-

-------
    1900
                  Extractables,%
 Figure 9,   Tensile at break of the samples
            of  exposed  FMLs as a  function
            of  their extractables.   Tensile
            data are the  averages of the
            values obtained in both machine
            and transverse directions.  The
            samples with the low values for
            extractables were  cut  from the
            liner at the  top  of the slope.
            Those with the high values were
            cut from   the liner  on  the
            bottom.  R = Baseline Reference
            EPDM, produced in 1972.
                                                    100
                                                 -  so
                                                      26   24   22    20    18   16   14    12
                                                                  Extractables,  %

                                              Figure 11.  Puncture  resistance  of  the
                                                          samples  of exposed FMLs  as  a
                                                          function  of  their extract-
                                                          ables.    Puncture  resistance
                                                          is the  maximum  stress value
                                                          calculated  for 100-mil
                                                          thickness  of the FML.   The
                                                          samples  with  the  low values
                                                          for  extractables were  cut
                                                          from the  liner  at the  top
                                                          of the slope.   Those with the
                                                          high values  were cut  from
                                                          the liner  on  the bottom.   R =
                                                          Baseline  Reference EPDM,
                                                          produced in 1972.
    900

#_ 800
o a- 700

•Si 600
(» 8 500

£ o 400

    300
55
    200
      '26   24   22   20   18   16
                   Extractables,%
                                    14
                                         12
                                                    600
                                                    500
                                                    400
o>  300
5
UJ
   200
                                                      26   24    22   20   18    16
                                                                  Extractables,  %
                                 14
                                      12
 Figure 10.   Stress  at 100?o elongation
             (S-100)  of the samples of
             exposed FMLs as  a  function of
             their extractables.   S-100
             rfata  are  the averages of the
             values   obtained  in  both
             machine  and  transverse  direc-
             tions.   The samples  with the
             low values  for  extractables
             were  cut  from the liner  at the
             top of the slope.   Those with
             the high  values  were  cut from
             the liner on the bottom.  R =
             Baseline  Reference  EPDM,
             produced  in 1972.
                                              Figure 12. Elongation  at  break of  the
                                                        •samples of exposed FMLs as  a
                                                         function   of their  e^tract-
                                                         ables.   Elongation  data  are
                                                         the  averages of the values
                                                         obtained in  both  machine  and
                                                         transverse  directions.   The
                                                         samples  with the low values
                                                         for extractables were cut from
                                                         the  liner  at the top of  the
                                                         slope.   Those  with  the high
                                                         values were cut  from  the liner
                                                         on the  bottom.   R = Baseline
                                                         Reference  EPDM, produced in
                                                         1972.
                                           -49-

-------
     •  In the case of sheeting  protected
        at the seams by an upper layer of
        sheeting,  the extractables are
        greater  and the tensile  strength,
        modulus,  and  puncture  resistance
        are less than those of  the  upper
        layer.  These  differences again
        appear to  reflect the increased
        plasticizer  content of the pro-
        tected sheeting.

     •  The factory seam results tend to
        show increased  strength  values in
        both  shear and peel  modes with
        increased  distance from  top to
        bottom down the slope.  The peel
        adhesion values increased from 6.5
        to  10.1 ppi with  distance down
        from the anchor trench; all the
        failures in the tests  were ad-
        hesion  failures  between  the
        sheetings.

     •  In the case of field seams,  there
        is a difference between the ex-
        posure locations.   A high value
        of  17.6 was obtained on  an un-
        failed part of the seam that was
        high on  the slope.   This seam had
        partially  failed during  exposure.
        Testing was  performed on an un-
        failed portion of the seam.  In
        this case,  the adhesive appeared
        to have  crosslinked more than had
        the seams in the other locations.
        In  all  cases, the  preponderant
        failure was a cohesive failure in
        the adhesive.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     The work reported in  this  paper was
performed  under  EPA  Contract 68-03-3169
with  the  Hazardous  Waste  Engineering
Research Laboratory of the U.S. Environ-
mental  Protection Agency,  Cincinnati,
Ohio.   The EPA Project Officer was Mr.
Robert E.  Landreth,  who located the site
for  this study.   The author wishes to
acknowledge  the   participation of Mr.
Robert Hartley of  the EPA  in  the recovery
of the  samples  and Mr. Thomas Erdman of
the  Doliet Army Ammunition  Plant, with
whom arrangements for access to  the  basin
were made and who  furnished a drawing of
the basin layout and the  analytical data
on the wastewater.
REFERENCES

Emcon Associates.   1983.  Field Verifi-
     cation  of Liners from Sanitary Land-
     fills.   EPA/9/-83-046.    U.S.  EPA,
     Cincinnati, Ohio,  p 32.

Haxo, H. E.   1983.   Analysis  and Finger-
     printing  of  Unexposed  and Exposed
     Polymeric  Membrane  Liners.    In:
     Proceedings  of the Ninth  Annual
     Research  Symposium:  Land  Disposal,
     Incineration,  and  Treatment  of
     Hazardous  Waste.  EPA-600/9-83-018.
     U.S. EPA,  Cincinnati,   Ohio.   pp.
     157-171.

Haxo, H. E., R. M. White, P. D.  Haxo, and
     M.  A.  Fong.   1982.   Final Report:
     Evaluation  of  Liner  Materials
     Exposed to  Municipal Solid  Waste
     Leachate.   U.S.  EPA, Cincinnati,
     Ohio.   NTIS  No.  PB 83-147-801.

Haxo, H. E., R. S. Haxo, N. A. Nelson, P.
     D.  Haxo, R.  M.  White, and  S. Dakes-
     sian.   1985.   Final Report:  Liner
     Materials  Exposed  to Hazardous  and
     Toxic  Wastes.   EPA-600/2-84-169.
     U.S.  EPA,  Cincinnati, Ohio.   NTIS
     No. PB  85-121-333.

Matrecon,  Inc.    1983.   Lining  of Waste
     Impoundment  and  Disposal  Facil-
     ities.  ' SW-870 Revised.   U.S.  EPA,
     Washington,  D.C.   448  pp.  GPO
     #055-00000231-2.

Nelson,  N.  A., H.  E.  Haxo,  and  Peter
     McGlew.  1985.  Recovery  and Testing
     of  a Synthetic  Liner from  a  Waste
     Lagoon After.Long-Term Exposure.
     In:  Proceedings  of the  Eleventh
     Annual  Research  Symposium:  Land
     Disposal   of  Hazardous  Waste.
     EPA/600/9-85/013.    U.S.  EPA,
     Cincinnati,  Ohio.   pp.  296-306.

Roberts,  S.,  N. A.  Nelson,  and H.  E.
     Haxo.   1983.   Evaluation of a Waste
     Impoundment Liner System  After Long-
     term  Exposure.   In: Proceedings  of
     the Ninth Annual Research Symposium:
     Land Disposal,  Incineration,  and
     Treatment of Hazardous Waste.   EPA-
     600/9-83-018.  U.S. EPA,  Cincinnati,
     Ohio.   pp. 172-187.
                                         -50-

-------
                          GEOSYNTHETIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR
                                   DOUBLE LINER SYSTEMS

                                  Gregory N. Richardson
                                           S&ME
                                Gary, North Carolina 27511

                                    Robert M. Koerner
                                    Drexel University
                                Philadelphia, Penn. 19104
                                         ABSTRACT

      The  "minimum technological  requirements" of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
 of  1984 require  a double  liner system  in most hazardous waste land disposal cells and
 surface impoundments. Ensuing guidance recommended the use of two flexible membrane liners
 (FML). Each  FML  in a landfill and  the  bottom FML in a surface impoundment is covered by a
 leachate  collection/removal  (LCR)  system to aid in preventing leachate from standing on
 the FMLs.  This paper reviews design  considerations for the FML and LCR systems within the
.double liner system.

      Potential failure  modes for geosynthetic FMLs and LCRs are described in this paper
 and design procedures are reviewed for each of the failure modes. Each design procedure
 calculates the actual service stress or flow conditions and compares this required
 performance  to the limiting  performance of the component  itself. The limiting performance
 is  typically obtained from laboratory  testing. A Design Ratio (DR) is defined'as the ratio
 of  the laboratory limiting performance'divided by the calculated service performance.
 OVERVIEW

      On November  8,  1984,  the Resource
 Conservation and  Recovery  Act (RCRA)  was
 amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste
 Amendments (HSWA).  Among the provisions that
 went  into effect  were minimum technological
 requirements for  hazardous waste land
 disposal facilities.  HSWA  requires new units
 and lateral expansions of  existing
 facilities to use two liners with a leachate.
 collection system above (in the case  of a
 landfill) and between such liners.

      Draft EPA Minimun Technology Guidance
 (MTG) (1,2) for liners and LCRs was
 published on May  25,  1985. Proposed
 codification of the MTG is outlined in the
 Federal Register, Vol.51,  No.60, March 28,
 1986.

      The MTG standard 'double-liner'  system
 for a landfill is shown on Figure 1 and
 consists of a primary LCR  and FML system
 over  a secondary  LCR'and a composite
FML/clay secondary liner. The primary LCR
minimizes the amount of leachate that is
allowed to stand on the primary FML. The
primary FML must be designed to allow no
more than de minimis quantities of leachate
to pass through the liner. The•secondary LCR
collects leachate that has passed through
the primary FML and in this fashion bears
'witness' to the integrity of the primary
FML. The secondary FML/clay liner must be
designed to prevent greater than de minimis
quantities of leachate from leaving the
system during the minimum 30-year post- •
closure monitoring period.

MTG MINIMUM DESIGN PROPERTIES

     The draft MTG provides minimum stand-
ards for each of the components within the
recommended double liner system. Shown on
^Figure 1, these are as follows:
                                             -51-

-------
                      Filter Layer
                                                                     Primary FML
                                                              SecondaryvFML\
                                   Compacted Clay Liner
                                           Native Soil Foundation
                              Figure  1  MTG Double-Liner System
o Primary LCR: This system is placed above
the primary FML and is separated from the
waste by a filter layer. It consists of a
minimum of 30 centimeters (cm) of drainage
stone having a minimum hydraulic
conductivity of 10~2 cm/second. A 15-cm
thick filter layer is placed between it and
the waste, and an internal pipe drain system
must be designed to keep less than 30 cm
maximum head of leachate acting on the
primary FML .

o Primary Liner: The primary liner must be
of synthetic material at least 0.75 milli-
meters (mm) thick. This liner must be
designed to allow no more than de minimls
quantities of leachate to pass through to
the secondary LCR. A composite soil/FML
primary liner is allowed under proposed
codification.
o Secondary LCR: This witness system has the
same minimum properties as the primary LCR
but lacks the overlying filter layer.
o Secondary Liner: This is a composite
FML/clay liner having an FML with the same
minimum thickness as the primary FML,
0.75mm, and an  underlying clay  having a
maximum permeability of 10~7 cm/sec and a
minimum  thickness of 90 cm. The secondary
FML is typically of the same material and
thickness as the primary FML.
DESIGN CONCEPT - FML

     A large number of failure scenarios can
be developed for an FML. These failures have
in common the generation of large tensile
stresses within the EML. Design for these
failure mechanisms is based on the stress-
strain curves for the particular polymeric
material used in forming the FML. For HOPE,
the short term stress vs strain curves yield
a well defined yield stress while for other
polymers such as PVC or CPE, the stress vs
strain curves show no distinct yield, Figure
2. Allowable stress limits for such curves
are based on a limiting strain level. In
both cases, the design philosophy is that a
significant amount of FML deformation
capacity remains even if the yield stress or
strain is reached.

     Figure 3 presents four tensile failure
mechanisms for an FML. All mechanisms can be
quantified on the basis of free-body
diagrams that sum the forces or stresses
parallel to the surface of the FML.  These
mechanisms include the following:

o Dead Weight - The self weight of the FML
places the FML in tension as it is draped
down the sideslope. A high value of DR,
greater than 10, insures that excessive
elongation of the FML does not occur during
placement of the FML. Fortunately, the
minimum MTG thickness is normally adequate
to generate this level of DR unless
extremely steep slopes are present.
                                            -52-

-------
                                  Thickness  = 0.75  cm
                                                                       To 1180%
                                                                       To 500%
                                                                       To 445%
                            40       80       120       160       180
                                                    Strain - percent
                            Figure 2  Stress vs Strain for FML
o Sliding Stability - Each synthetic layer
forming the liner systems forms a potential
shear failure plane. Shear is transferred to
and from each layer through the friction or
adhesion that exists between that layer and
the adjacent layers. Shear stresses in
excess of that which can be transferred by
these surface forces must be resisted in
tension by that layer. This reduces the
shear stresses transferred to underlying
layers.

o Waste Lift Stability - the placement of
waste against the liner can produce
significant downdrag forces on the liner
system. DR values for such problems can
easily fall below one (3) if lift heights  .
exceed 3 meters.
o Settlement of Liner - Settlement of the,
subgrade beneath the liner system can lead
to excessive strains within an FML (4). Such
settlement could result from the collapse of
a drainage line or the uneven densification
of poorly compacted soils. The designer must
predict subgrade settlements and verify that
an adequate DR will exist under these
conditions.

With the exception of settlement, these
failure mechanisms are also appropriate for
evaluation of synthetic LCR systems.
     With the exception of the settlement
mechanism, all of the above design concerns
predict a tension force T acting in the
plane of the FML at the shoulder of the
sideslope. This force must be resisted by
anchorage of the FML beyond the shoulder.
Such anchorage is commonly provided by
running the FML beyond the shoulder and
either burying the end of the FML in a
trench or by simply placing sand on top of
the FML. Typical FML anchor geometries are
shown on Figure 4. The maximum anchorage
tension, Tmax, for the horizontal anchor is
given by
                  qLtan 8
cos   - sinS tan '%>
                       S
                                   (1)
where S  is the friction angle between the
subgrade soil and the FML. The maximum
anchorage of the trench system cannot be
rigorously calculated at present but can be
bounded as follows:
Ttch = Tho
              (Ka+K' JtanS [0.5 If d? + qd]
                  cos ^ - sin^ tan &
                                     (2)
where d is the depth of embedment, Ka is
the active earth pressure coefficient and
K' is the at-rest or the passive earth
pressure coefficient. The actual anchorage
                                            -53-

-------
     •S.eiu-
   DEAD  WEIGHT
                                              \vi •FVAL
                                              «  V4
                                                VI
                                                                      FM.L-
           SLIDING STABILITY
     FML (T)=
                   vgetx
WASTE LIFT STABILITY
                                    w
10
         0-1       O'Z.  .    0.1

      SETTLEMENT  for  LINER
           Figure  3   FML Tensile Failure Models

                                -54-

-------
                 Surcharge =  q
                Horizontal Anchor
                        Load from above

                        Point load with
                        hydrostatic


                        Protective layer
                 Shallow  "V Trench
                                                                        Support layer


                                                                     '   Point load without
                                                                        hydrostatic
   Figure 5  FML Compressive Stresses
   X
      X
        X
                 Anchor Trench
          Figure 4  FML Anchorage
 capacity lies between that  predicted hy the
 two values of K'.  The design is  then based
 on the smaller anchorage force to predict
 DRs based on pullout and the higher anchor-
 age force to calculate stresses  in the FML
 itself.

      In service, the FML is also subjected
 to large normal stresses due to  the weight
 of the overlying waste.  These stresses tend
 to push the FML into the void spaces within
.the underlying subgrade. Knipshield (4)
 portrays the stresses acting on  a localized
 portion of the FML as shown on Figure  5.
 Large subgrade particle size may create
 void spaces large  enough to generate
 localized failure. While this situation
 could be minimized by placing a geotextile
 beneath the FML, this would destroy the
 intimate contact bewteen the FML and the
 underlying clay. The limiting normal stress
 is determined from laboratory tests that
 simulate the field system described above.
DESIGN CONCEPT - LCR

     Geosynthetic LCR systems play an
important role in the facility by collecting
leachate at any location on the liner and
conveying it to a low point or sump where it
can be removed. The design of the LCR based
on in-plane flow is controlled by both the  '
minimun MTG properties and the requirement
that no more than 30 cm  head of leachate
may act on the underlying FML. The head ,
acting on the FML is controlled by the rate
at which leachate is being generated and
collected within the system, the hydraulic
properties of the LCR, and the spacing of
the collector pipes within the LCR. These
parameters are shown on Figure 6. Early work
(5,6) related these parameters to the rate
of leachate generation which is commonly not
known. The maximum head acting on the FML is
then given by
      L/C"
Hmax= ~~~~ t
                         tano<
/•
/tan2«X
    (3)
                                         c ]
where c is defined as the inflow rate
divided by the hydraulic conductivity of the
LCR. This'method has been supplemented by an
alternate procedure (7) that is based on the
percolation velocity of the leachate. The
maximim leachate head using this method is
given by
                                   (4)
                                             -55-

-------
 whore e Is the percolation velocity based on
 conversion of the annual percipitation rat.e
 into a uniform velocity (cm/sec).

      A synthetic LCR may be composed of a
 homogeneous material, e.g. a thick nonwoven
 needled geotextile, or a composite formed of
 a core that provides planar flow capacity
 and a surface geotextile that acts as a
 filter to prevent the adjacent soil from
 intruding and blocking the core.- The planar
 flow capacity of the LCR is defined by
 Careys equation as
               Kp i A
           q - Kp [dh/L]  W t
(5)

(6)
 wnere Kp is the permeability in the plane of
 the LCR, dh is head loss,  L is flow length,
 W is the width of the flow path, and t is
 the thickness of the LCR.  Equation (6) is
 typically expressed as
           q - 6 [dh/L]  W
(7)
 where 9 is defined as transmissivity and is
 equal to the product of Kp and t (8).

     The transmissivity of an LCR can be
reduced by compression of the core and
Intrusion of adjacent geotextiles or  geo-
membranes due to soil pressure. These
effects can occur elastically as normal
loads are increased on the LCR or plastical-
ly over time in the completed cell.
Laboratory data are shown on Figure 7 for a
typical synthetic LCR. These data reflect
only the elastic reduction of transmis-
sivity. Long-term tests are rarely performed
to evaluate the future reduction in trans-
ralssivity due to plastic deformations.
Procedures (3) have been presented, however,
for estimating these losses based on  an
analysis of core and filter material  creep
properties.
                     q = inflow
.11 mm 111  m i  m  m  m
                                  LCR
                Clay Liner
Figure 6 Calculation of Drain Pipe  Spacing
                  .01
O
o
M
Tr

.
0
0
o
H*
                                                   .00001
                                              Increasing
                                              Confining "
                                              Pressure
                  Figure
 0.25     0.50   0.75  '  1.0
             Hydraulic  Gradient


7 Transmissivity Data
  Synthetic LCR
                 Leachate must first flow through the
            filter layer of a synthetic LCR before it
            can be drained away. The filter layer must
            be selected so that it will filter out the
            soil particles from the,adjacent soil and
            yet-hot become clogged by these same soil
            particles. No true design procedure is at
            present available to evaluate filtration and
            clogging potential. There are, however,
            index tests that indicate  the tendency of a
            given fabric to filter or be clogged by a
            given soil.

                 The filtering ability of a. fabric has
            traditionally been related to the Apparent
            Opening Size (AOS) of the fabric. The AOS is
            defined as the diameter of glass beads with
            5* retained in the fabric after shaking. AOS
            is appropriate for woven and lightweight
            fabrics but is questionable for heavy weight
            nonwoven fabrics.  In general, filter
            criteria guidelines are of the form
                      °fabric
                     (8)
            where Ofabric is usually the AOS of the
            fabric,  dsoii is a soil particle diameter
            obtained from a grain size analysis,  and A
            is an emperical factor. One example of this
            concept  is the filtration criteria by Giroud
            as presented in Table 1.  This method (9)
            incorporates grainsize data and relative
            density  of the soil.  Assuming the fabric
            manufacturer supplies the AOS for the
           : fabric,  the filtration design requires
           ;knowledge of fundamental  properties of the
            site-specific soil.
                                            -56-

-------
                          Table 1  Geotextile Filter Criteria (9)
           Relative Density,Dr

           Loose(Dr<50j£)

           Intermediate
           (50£80£)
           Dense(Dr>
     13
095<(9d50)/CU

095<(13.5d50)/CU

095<(18d5o)/CU
      Where  Dr is relative density,  dgo is the grain size corresponding to  5055
      passing,  09g  is still equal to the AOS of the geotextile,  and CU is  the
      coefficient of uniformityCd^o/dio) of the soil.
     Clogging of the fabric- by soil grains
occurs with time. The clogging potential of
a given fabric and soil is evaluated in the
laboratory using the gradient, ratio test or
longterm flow tests. The equipment for this
test consists of a soil column resting on a
geotextile as shown schematically in Figure
8. The test does not reproduce in-sltu
conditions and as such is only an index
test. As water is run through the column,
the. fabric becomes clogged and a hydrostatic
pressure gradient develops across the
fabric. If the gradient ratio, as defined on
Figure 8, exceeds 3, then there is a
potential for clogging of the fabric by the
soil. Recent studies (10) have shown that
•7
Leachate
\ ds&y/&y/Ad 'tf^t**

\ Soil \ jl"
^yfggC^jttl
^—Fabric
	 |





'i"+fabric

HI
H2

H9
• GRADIENT RATIO <= gj
               flow
 Figure  8   Gradient  Ratio Test - Clogging
           the gradient ratio test may not predict
           clogging in many critical applications.
                Long term flow tests use the same
           apparatus as the gradient ratio test but •
           measure the actual flow rate of leachate
           passing through the sample over an extended
           time period. Typical data from a long-term
           test are shown on Figure 9. The slope of the
           curve is the focus of attention. If the
           slope continues to "be negative, then the
           fabric will eventually clog. The combination
           of an acceptable flow rate and a final slope
           of zero indicates an acceptable soil/fabric
           combination.

           ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

                Additional geosynthetic components are
           used in building interior ramps, berms,
           drainage standpipes, and the cap structure.
           These ancillary components are not reviewed
           in this paper.

                The designer must also verify that the
           synthetics used to build the system are
           resistant to  chemical attack from the
           leachate. While beyond the scope of this
           paper, guidelines for chemical evaluation
           are presented elsewhere (11). The designer
           must also be  aware of the need for a better
           assesment of. long-term creep performance of
           the synthetics, hydraulic problems related
           to biological growth within an LCR system,
           and field construction quality control
           problems. These unknown long-term
           performance factors and the impact of  a
           failure in these facilities force today's   '
           designer to use Design Ratios significantly
           higher that conventional designs require.
                                            -57-

-------
 ['I
 A
 T <•
 E
 e
 e 31
         *.
         SCO
              1000    1500    2000    2500    3000
                     TIME (HOURS)
  Figure 9 Long Tersi Flow Test  - Clogging

 SUMMARY

      This  paper elaborates  on the basic
 design considerations  needed, to verify the
 mechanical and hydraulic performance of  the
 FML and LCR components for  double-liner
 systems for both  landfills  and  surface
 impoundments.  The designs are based on
 estimates  of actual field stress and
 hydraulic  conditions and on laboratory
 measures of'the limit  capacities of the
 synthetic  components.  These procedures
 are valid  for both short and long-term
 conditions if appropriate laboratory tests
 are used.

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

     This work has been sponsored by the
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,    ' ;
Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory, Cincinnati,  Ohio.

 REFERENCES

 l.EPA,  1985, Minimum Technology Guidance  on
 Double Liner Systems for Landfills  and
 Surface Impoundments-Design,  Construction,
 and Operation, 2nd Draft Version, May  24.
 (EPA/530-SW-85-014)

 2.EPA,  1985, Minimum Technology Guidance  on
 Single Liner Systems for Landfills,  Surface
 Impoundments,  and Waste Piles-Design,
 Construction,  and Operation,  Draft,  May  24.
 (EPA/530-SW-85-013)

 S.Koerner,  R.M. and G.N. Richardson,  1987.
 Design of  Geosynthetic Systems  for  Waste
 Disposal,  Proc. ASCE-6T Conf. Geotechnlcal
 Practice for Waste Disposal,  Univ.  Mich.,
 Ann Arbor,  Mich., June.
4.Knipshield, William K., 1985. Material
Selection and Dimensioning of Plastic Sheet
to Protect Groundwater, Waste and Refuse.
Schmidt Publisher, Vol. 22.

B.Wong, J», 1977. The Design of a System for
Collecting Leachate From a Lined Landfill
Site, Water Resources Research, Vol. B,
No.2.

6.Demetracopolous, A.C., et al, 1984.
Modeling for Design of Landfill Bottom
Liners, Journal Environmental Engineering.
ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 6, December.

7.EPA, 1983, Landfill and Surface Impound-
ment Performance Evaluation, SW-869, April.

S.koerner, R.M., 1986.Designing With
Geosynthetics. Prentice-Hall.

9.Giroud, J.P., 1982. Filter Criteria for
Geotextiles, Proc. Second Intl. Conf. on
Geotextiles. IFAI, Las Vegas, Vol.1, June.

lO.Halse, Y. ,et.al., 1987, Filtration
Properties of Geotextiles Under Long Term
Testing, Proc. ASCE/PennDot Tech. Seminar.
Hershey, Pa, April.

ll.Matrecon,  Inc.  , 1987, "Lining of Waste
Impoundment and Disposal Facilities,
(Draft),  Third Edition,  SW-870,  U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, Oh.
                                            -58-

-------
                               INSPECTION PROCEDURES/CRITERIA
                        FOR -INSTALLATION OF FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE LINERS
                            Thomas D. Wright and J.  Rodney Marsh
                                       SCS  Engineers
                                Long  Beach,  California  90807

                                      William M. Held
                                       SCS  Engineers
                                 Covington, Kentucky  41017

                                      Louis R.  Hoyater
                                      Hovater Engineers
                               Laguna Hills, California  92653
            .                              ABSTRACT


     Inspection of flexible membrane liner (FML) installation is important in assuring
required hazardous waste containment.  This paper outlines the procedures and criteria for
inspecting the installation of the four most commonly used FMLs for land containment of
hazardous wastes:

•  Polyvinyl chloride (PVC).

•  Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (CSPE).

•  High-density polyethylene (HOPE).

•  Chlorinated polyethylene (CPE).

     The FML installation steps for which inspection procedures are provided include:

«  Unloading and storage of FML.                                       /

•  Preparation and maintenance of the FML supporting surface (earth and other supporting
   surfaces are discussed).

•  Placement of FML on supporting surface.

•  FML seaming operations.

•  FML anchoring and sealing including anchoring in earth and anchoring to concrete and
   other materials.

0  FML testing including seam testing and testing of the integrity of the entire FML
   installation.

•  FML cover operations.

     The FML installer and  inspector should be  able to follow the guidelines developed by
this study  in preparing construction quality assurance plans, and in assuring that design
plans and specifications are met.                                         ,


                                            -59-

-------
 BACKGROUND

      FMLs are thin prefabricated polymeric
 layers of sheets of plastic or rubber com-
 monly used for the containment of hazard-
 ous and other wastes.  Inspection of an
 FML installation is important in assuring
 containment of wastes.

      This paper discusses a manual pre-
 pared for the EPA which contains the pro-
 cedures and criteria for inspecting the
 Installation of the four most commonly
 used FMLs (PVC, CSPE, HOPE, and CPE) for
 land containment of wastes.  The manual is
 intended for use by regulatory officials,'
 engineering firms, and facility owners/
 operators.   The manual can also be used as
 a guide in preparing quality assurance
 plans and as a guide for construction
 quality assurance inspectors for assuring
 that design plan and specification re-
 quirements  are met.

      In order to develop a practical docu-
 went questionnaires were sent to,  and
 interviews  were conducted with,  manufac-
 turers  (raw materials and finished mate-
 rials),  fabricators,  lining contractors,
 testing  laboratories,  and consulting engi-
 neering  firms to solicit their comments
 regarding FML installation.   In  addition,
 a  thorough  review of  over 300 documents
 regarding FML installation was conducted
 as a further basis  for manual  preparation.

 MANUAL CONTENTS

      Discussions  among in-house  and  EPA
 personnel regarding the  presentation for-
 mat  best  suited  for use  by an  inspector or
 other user resulted in the manual  being
 divided  into  seven  chapters that sequen-
 tially cover  each FML  installation proce-
 dure.  These  are:

 •  On-site unloading/storage of FML.

 •  Preparation and maintenance of the FML
   supporting surface.

 •  Placement of FML on supporting surface.

•  FML seaming operations.

•  FML anchors/attachments.
 •  FML testing, including seam testing and
    testing of the integrity of the entire
    FML installation.

 •  FML cover operations.

      This format allows the inspector the
 capability of removing chapters indivi-
 dually as he inspects the various  instal-
 lation procedures (assuming the manual  is
 kept in a three ring  binder or each  chap-
 ter is bound separately).   It  is hoped
 that the ease of carrying smaller,  less
 cumbersome inspection materials will  en-
 courage the inspector to  keep  the  appli-
 cable portion of the  manual  with him  as
 required to assure  proper installation.

      A brief discussion of  each chapter is
 given below.   Copies  of the completed
 manual  will  be made available  through
 NTIS.

 On-Site Unloading/Storage

      The initial  step of  FML inspection is
 to  make sure  the  specified  FML  type and
 accessories  are delivered to the job site
 undamaged.  This  is primarily the respon-
 sibility of the installation supervisor.
 However,  the  inspector should also make
 spot  checks.

     Once the  FML is  accepted as undam-
 aged,  it  is important that  it be carefully
 unloaded  onto  a surface that is relatively
 level  and smooth, free of rocks, holes and
 debris  to prevent damage to  the FML.

     FML materials and accessories are
 best kept out of direct weather conditions
 to  prevent possible damage from sun, wind,
 or  moisture.  Quite often the storage area
 is  in the same location as the unloading
 area.   If this is the case, the area must
 be  large enough so that unloading,  stor-
 age, and transport can operate smoothly.
 If  the storage area is in  a building,
 proper accessibility and maneuverability
 are of primary importance.  A loading dock
 is  also of great value.   If the storage
 area is open it should generally be fenced
for security.

     Specific sections and subsections in
the manual discussing  inspection criteria
and procedures for on-site unloading/
storage are listed below.
                                           -60-

-------
•  Material check.

   - FML.
   - Accessories.

0  Unloading and handling equipment.

•  Unloading area:

   - Accessibility.
   - Type.
   - Location.
   - Unloading and handling.

•  Storage area:

   - Type.
   - Location.
   - Climatic conditions.
   - Other factors.

Preparation  and  Maintenance  of Supporting
Surface

     For purposes  of  the manual,  a  sup-
porting  surface  is defined as the surface
on which the FML will  be placed.  For  a
single FML system, the supporting surface
will probably consist of compacted  earth,
concrete, asphalt, or other  material.  If
a second FML is  specified  (a double FML
system), the supporting surface  for the
top  FML  will generally consist of a drain-
age  net, a granular,soil  layer,  and/or a
geotextile fabric.

     Whether a  single or double  FML sys-
tem,  it  is assumed that the  supporting
 surface  has  been brought to  final grade,
 and  that the earth subgrade  (if  appli-
cable) has been compacted and  is struc-
 turally  sound.

      If  the  supporting surface is earth,
 the inspector should be aware that  the
 soil  type will  effect the installation
 procedure.  For example, clayey soils form
 surface cracks when dried, and sandy soils
 form depressions under foot and vehicular
 traffic.  A table containing soil charac-
 teristics pertinent to FML installations
 is included in the manual.

      An earth supporting surface should be
 free of all  vegetative growth prior to
 final preparation.  Burrowing animals
 (e.g., gophers and ground squirrels)
 should also be removed, and/or their tun-
 nels destroyed.   Final preparation con-
 sists of removing all  clods, pebbles,
etc., filling in voids, and rolling/com-
pacting the surface.

     After the supporting surface has been
accepted for FML placement, it is impor-
tant to maintain its  integrity by miti-
gating or correcting  damage caused by wind
or storm water erosion, and saturation or
ponding by storm water.

     Supporting surfaces other than earth
(e.g., concrete and asphalt) must also be
inspected to assure that they are smooth,
free of surface voids or depressions, and
that there are no abrupt changes in abut-
ting surface elevations.

     The specific sections and subsections
as they appear in the manual are as fol-  ,
lows:

«  Earth supporting surfaces:

   - Type of soil.
   - Vegetation removal.
   - Burrowing animals, ants, and other
     pests.
   - Preparation of finished earth sup-
     porting surface.
   - Maintenance of earth  supporting  sur-
     face.

•  Other  supporting surfaces:

   - Concrete.
   - Asphaltic  supporting  surfaces.
   - Geotextile fabric.
   - Drainage  layers.

 Placement of FML on Supporting Surface

      Placement  of  FML  on the  supporting
 surface includes:  transporting  the  FML to
 the  working area;  removing the FML from
 its  packaging;  and spreading  the FML
 sheets in their appropriate locations,
 making sure each  FML  is not damaged  (e.g.,
 has  no holes,  etc.)  and is ready for seam-
 ing.

      Prior to commencing placement of the
 FML, the inspector should  first  ensure
 that placement equipment is on  site  and in
 working order;  a sufficient number of
 qualified placement  personnel are on site;
 and weather conditions are suitable.

      Specific sections and subsections in
 the manual discussing placement inspection
 criteria and procedures are listed below.
                                             -61-

-------
 •  Placement equipment.

 •  Personnel.

 •  Weather conditions.

 *  FML layout:

    - Type of FML.
    - Thickness of FML.
    - Accessibility.
    - Placement on slopes.
    - Placement around penetrations.

 Seaming Operations

      FML seams can be prepared either in
 the factory or in the field.  Factory
 seams are manufactured in a controlled
 environment, and seam quality is generally
 superior to field seams.  Since the field
 inspector is not responsible for observing
 the making of factory seams, only a brief
 summary of factory seaming techniques is
 provided in the manual as background.
 However, the overall  quality assurance/
 quality control should require this fac-
 tory inspection.

      The primary objective of the manual
 is  to discuss  field  seaming operations and
 the inspection thereof.   However, the dis-
 cussion is necessarily general  because
 each  FML manufacturer/fabricator has spe-
 cific (and often  proprietary)  seaming
 equipment and  seaming procedures.

      Prior to  the start  of FML seaming
 operations,  the manufacturer should  pro-
 vide  the inspector with  precise specifica-
 tions on the equipment and procedures that
 will  be used to seam  their material  in the
 factory and field.  In addition,  the
 inspector should  meet with the  manufac-
 turer's/fabricator's  representative  for an
 explanation and demonstration of  the seam-
 ing equipment and procedures to be used on
 the job.

      Seaming methods  described  include
 liquid  applied  solvent or  adhesive
methods; thermal  methods;  vulcanizing
tapes and  adhesives;  and tape and mechani-
cal seaming methods.

     Specific sections and  subsections in
manual discussing  seaming  inspection cri-
teria and procedures  are listed below.
 •  Seaming methods:

    - Factory seams. '
    - Field seams.

 •  Equipment.

 •  Personnel.

 •  Environmental  conditions.

 •  Seaming.

 Liner Anchors/Attachments

      One of the most common sources of
 failure in an FML installation is the
 attachment of the FML  to  another surface.
 In general, these attachments  consist of
 perimeter anchors or attachments to struc-
 tures,  such as pipes or columns, within
 the facility.

      The manual provides  the inspector
 with guidance  on  specific types  of
 anchors/attachments, and  also  delineates
 several  general practices and  procedures
 that should be followed.  These  include
 ensuring that  placement equipment is  on
 site,  in working  order, and that a  suffi-
 cient  number of qualified placement per-
 sonnel  are on  site.

     Specific  sections  and subsections in
 the manual  discussing  liner anchors/
 attachments inspection  criteria  and proce-
 dures are listed  below.

 •   Placement equipment.

 •   Personnel.

 •   Anchors/attachments:

    - Earth  anchor trenches.
    - Inspection procedures.
    - Concrete and piping.
    - Concrete.
    - Battens and bolts.
    - Reglets.
    - Piping.

 FML Testing

     This chapter of the manual introduces
the inspector to methods that are used to
test factory and field  seams and patches.
These test methods can  be  destructive
and/or nondestructive.   Nondestructive
tests are performed in  the field on in-
place FML.  Testing is  performed by the
                                           -62-

-------
contractor and should be observed by the
inspector.  This type of test retains the
integrity of the FML seam or sheet being
tested.  Destructive tests are performed
in either the field or laboratory.  The
intent is to determine the strength char-
acteristics of a seam sample by stressing
the sample until either the seam or the
FML sheeting fails.  Only tests performed
in the field should be observed by the
inspector; however the inspector should
review laboratory test results to ensure
acceptable results were obtained.

     Destructive tests can be performed on
samples taken from either in-place FML
seams, sheets, and patches (destructive
sampling), or on samples of representative
FML seams and patches fabricated by the
seaming/patching crew from the same mate-
rial, and using the same seaming methods
as those being used to make the in-place
seams and patches  (nondestructive sam-
pling).  The inspector should verify that
the type of samples used are those speci-
fied in the quality assurance/quality con-
trol plan.

     Field test methods described in the
manual are probe,  air lance, vacuum box,
ultrasonic pulse echo, ultrasonic imped-
ance plane, spark, pressurized dual seam,
electrical resistivity, hydrostatic, seam
strength peel, and,seam strength shear
tests.  Laboratory test methods described,
are the bonded seam strength shear and
bonded seam strength peel tests.

     Specific sections and subsections  in
the manual discussing FML testing inspec-
tion criteria and  procedures are  listed
below.

• Field  tests:

   - Air  lance.
   - Probe.
   - Vacuum box.
   - Ultrasonic  pulse echo.
   - Ultrasonic  impedance plane.
   - Spark testing.
   - Pressurized dual seam.
   - Electrical  resistivity.
   - Hydrostatic.
   - Seam strength peel.
   - Seam strength shear.

 • Laboratory tests:

   -  Bonded  seam strength,  shear.
   -  Bonded  seam strength,  peel.
 FML Covers

      The  primary  function  of the  inspector
 is to ensure  that the  FML  is not  damaged
 during cover  placement operations.   Covers
 over an FML will  generally consist  of
 earth (clay [natural and/or bentonite
 added], sand, silt,  gravel, or  a  combina-
 tion of soils)  or some other material such
 as portlahd cement/gunite, geotextile or
 drainage  net.

      The  majority of the above  covers are
 placed over an FML as  a protective  layer
 against mechanical,  weather or  other
 potential damage.  Drainage nets  and sand
 and gravel  are used  as a permeable  layer
 to convey leakage and/or leachate that may
 accumulate on the upper and/or  lower FML
 after being put into use.

      Specific sections and subsections in
 the manual  discussing  cover type  and
 placement inspection criteria  and proce-
 dures are as  follows:,

 •  Earth  covers:

    - Equipment.
    - Personnel.
    - Weather conditions.
    - Earth cover placement.

 •  Portland cement concrete/gunite:

    - Equipment.
    - Personnel.
    - Weather conditions.

 •  Drainage nets and geotextiles.

 SUMMARY                ,

      An  improperly installed  FML is  little
 better than no liner at all,  and may actu-
 ally be  worse, because it provides  a false
 sense of security.  Consequently, the role
 of the inspector in ensuring  proper  FML
 installation can be critical.   The inspec-
 tor needs to be  aware of  all  procedures
 and criteria essential for proper instal-
 lation,  from unloading and storage at the
 site through actual placement and final  .
 cover.

    The use of the manual   described herein
•should play  a major role  in standardizing'
 inspection procedures and  in ensuring .
 proper installation of FMLs at hazardous
 waste  sites.
                                            -63-

-------
                      AN ASSESSMENT OF MATERIALS THAT INTERFERE WITH
                          STABILIZATION/SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES

                        M. John Cullinane, Jr.,  R.  Mark Bricka, and
                              and Norman R. Francingues, Jr.
                     U. S. Army Engineer Waterways  Experiment Station
                                 Vicksburg, MS  39180-0631

                                         ABSTRACT

      Stabilization/solidification of hazardous  waste involves mixing the waste with a
 binder material to enhance the physical properties of the waste and to  immobilize con-
 taminants that may be detrimental to the environment.  Many  hazardous wastes  contain
 materials that are known to inhibit the setting and strength development properties of
 commonly used stabilization/solidification binder  materials.  This paper describes the
 initial results of an evaluation into the affect of ten interfering agents: oil, grease,
 lead nitrate, copper nitrate,  zinc nitrate, sodium hydroxide,  sodium sulfite, phenol,
 trichloroethylene, and hexachlorobenzene on the setting and  strength development prop-
 erties of a metal hydroxide sludge stabilized/solidified with three binder materials
 (Portland cement, lime/flyash,  and cement/flyash).

      The setting and strength  development properties of the  waste-binder-interfering
 agent mixture were evaluated using the unconfined  compressive  strength  (UCS)  test.  UCS
 data indicated that relatively low levels (less than 8  percent)  of phenols, lead nitrate,
 oil,  and grease can result in  an 80 percent reduction in the 28-day UCS developed by the
 waste-binder-interfering agent mixture as compared  to control  specimens.
 Xrichloroethylene and hexachlorobenzene where shown to  have  little effect on  strength
 development.

      The results of this research confirm the need  for  waste-binder  specific  studies
 prior to the  selection of a chemical stabilization/solidification  process for the treat-
 ment  of hazardous wastes.
INTRODUCTION

Background

     The Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA) is responsible for evalu-
ating the suitability of hazardous waste
and materials for land disposal.  Chemical
stabilization/solidification (S/S) is one
technique that has been proposed as a
means of controlling the release of con-
taminants from landfilled wastes to sur-
face and ground waters.  Indeed, S/S of
hazardous wastes is recognized in regula-
tions implementing both the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986
(SARA) and the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Act Amendments of 1984 (RCRA).
     A variety of S/S technologies have
been proposed for treating hazardous
wastes.  The most commonly applied tech-
nologies use cement, pozzolan, or cement-
pozzolan combinations as the primary means
of contaminant immobilization (U. S. EPA
1980, Cullinane et al. 1986).  A potential
problem with using S/S technology involves
chemical interferences with the hydration
reactions typical of the cement and
pozzolan processes.  Experience in the
cement and construction industry has
demonstrated that small amounts of some
chemicals can significantly affect the
setting and strength development charac-
teristics of concrete.  Consequently, the
cement industry has developed fairly
stringent criteria for the quality of
                                          -64-

-------
cement, aggregate, water, and additives
(accelerators or retarders) that are
allowed in concrete (Jones et al. 1986).

     Of particular concern to S/S tech-
nology is the affect of organic compounds
on the strength and contaminant immobili-
zation characteristics of the final
product.  It is well documented that small
concentrations of organic compounds (Young
1972, Young 1973), sugars (Ashworth 1965)
formaldehydes (Rosskopf 1975) and various
chemical contaminants typically found in
hazardous waste affect the setting mecha-
nisms of pozzolan cements and lime flyash
pozzolans.  Roberts (1978) and Smith
(1979) reported on the affects of metha-
nol, xylene, benzene, adipic acid, and an
oil and grease mixture on the strength and
leaching characteristics of a typical
lime/flyash S/S formulation.  Smith (1979)
concludes that there was a good correla-
tion between the effects of organic com-
pounds on lime/flyash pozzolanic systems
and the reported effects on the hydration
of Portland cement.  More recently,
Chalasani, et al. (1986) and Walsh, et al.
(1986) , using x-ray diffraction and scan-
ning electron microscopy techniques,
reported on the affects of ethylene glycol
and p-bromophenol on the microstructure of
Portland cement hydration products.  Eth—
ylene glycol was found to produce signifi-
cant changes in the microstructure up to
at least a year of curing time.

Purpose and Scope

The purpose of the research described by
this paper is to develop data on the com-
patibility of ten waste constituents with
three binding agents - Portland cement,
Portland cement/flyash, and lime/flyash
pozzolan cement.  Only the results of the
unconfined compressive strength  (UCS) test
are presented in this paper.  The
remainder of the data will be presented in
a comprehensive report scheduled for'
publication in 1988, after completion of
the project.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Jones  et al.  (1985) described the basic
research program to evaluate the effects
of interfering compounds on S/S processes
'at a previous conference.  The study
reported on herein was conducted in three
phases:  (1) preparation of a synthetic
wastewater and sludge;  (2) addition of a
binder and interfering material to the
sludge; and (3) UCS testing of cured spec-
imens containing sludge, binder, and
interference chemicals.

Synthetic Wastewater and Sludge Production

Initial laboratory tests revealed that a
synthetic wastewater containing nitrate
salts of cadmium, chromium, nickel, and
mercury at 600 times the EPA extraction
procedure limit could be treated with
calcium hydroxide to produce a hydroxide
sludge with typical metal concentrations
of 86.2, 84.1, 18.8, and 0.137 mg/g (dry
weight basis) of nickel, chromium,
cadmium, and mercury respectively.

     Typically, the raw sludge contained
8 percent solids and was very fluid.  The
sludge was dewatered to approximately
30 percent solids using a rotary drum
vacuum filter.  A constant moisture con-
tent between sludge batches was maintained
by adjusting the solids content of the
dewatered sludge to 25 percent using the
supernatant liquid from the sludge produc-
tion process as a dilution liquid.

Specimen Preparation

     The 25 percent solids content sludge
was divided into three 150 gallon samples
and binder material was added to each at
the following ratios.
      Binder

  Portland Cement
  (Type I)

  Portland Cement
  (Type I)/Flyash
  (Type F)

  Lime/Flyash
  (Type C)
     Binder/Sludge
        Ratio

0.3:1 Cement:Sludge
0.2:1 Cement:Sludge
0.5:1 Flyash:Sludge
0.3:1 Lime:Sludge
0.5:1 Flyash:Sludge
After mixing the sludge with the binder,
each binder/sludge sample was subdivided
into four equal parts.  One of the ten
interfering chemicals was added to each of
the subsamples at ratios of 0, 0.02, 0.05,
and 0.08  (by weight) interference chemical
to binder/sludge material.  The subsample
to which no interference chemical was
added was used as a control specimen.  A
control specimen Was prepared each time an
interference chemical was processed, thus
                                           -65-

-------
r
                  accounting for variability between
                  batches, so that the UCS results between
                  batches could be compared.

                       The interference/binder/sludge mix-
                  ture (I/B/S) was then molded into two inch
                  cubes in accordance with ASTM Method
                  C-109-77/86 (ASTM 1986).  Because the
                  I/B/S mixture was usually viscous and
                  could not be tamped into the molds, the
                  ASTM method was modified to include vibra-
                  tion of the I/B/S mixture to remove any
                  air pockets that developed during the
                  molding process.

                       The specimens were  cured in the molds
                  at 23° C and 98 percent  relative humidity
                  for a minimum of 24 hours and removed from
                  the molds whenever they  developed suf-
                  ficient strength to be free standing.
                  After removal from the molds, the speci-
                  mens were cured under the same conditions
                  for periods of 4, 11, and 28 days.  At the
                  end of each curing period, the UCS of the
                  specimens was determined in accordance
                  with ASTM C 109-77/86.

                  DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

                  Space limitations do not allow presenta-
                  tion of all the study results.  Typical
                  results for selected interferences are
                  discussed below.

                       Table 1 presents the results,
                  reported as the percent  increase or
                  decrease in 28-day UCS from the control
                  specimen.  Figures 1 through 5 present a
                  graphical representation of the results of
                  the study.  Figure 1 presents the UCS
                  versus curing time for the cement binder-
                  sodium hydroxide interference.  Each curve
                  represents the strength  development curve
                  for one interference concentration.  Fig-
                  ure 2 presents the 28-day UCS versus
                  interference concentration for each of the
                  three binders for the sodium hydroxide.
                  Figures 3, 4,  and 5 present a graphical
                  representation of the relative effects of
                  interference concentration on the 28-day
                  UCS of the three binders.

                  The data for the 28 day  UCS are an indica-
                  tor of the UCS trends observed at the
                  earlier curing  periods.   This is clearly
                  illustrated in Figure 1  which is  a plot of
                  cure time versus UCS for one interference
                  material.   Although the  slope of  the
                  curves  varies  between binder and  inter-
                  ference treatments,  in most cases,  the
 lines  of  constant  interference concentra-
 tion do not  cross.

 Portland  Cement Binder

     The  data presented in Table 1 clearly
 indicate  that the  interference effects may
 be positive  or negative, depending on the
 concentration of the interfering material.
 The  addition of oil or grease at a
 0.08 ratio resulted in a 44 percent
 decrease  in  the 28-day UCS.  The addition
 of copper nitrate, resulted in an increase
 in UCS for all concentrations.  The addi-
 tion of copper nitrate at a 0.05 ratio
 resulted  in  a 181 percent increase in the
 28-day UCS.  The addition of zinc nitrate
 resulted  in  the an increase in UCS for the
 0.02 ratio;  however, when added at a
 0.08 ratio,  it resulted in the largest UCS
 decrease, 85.5 percent, observed for any
 of the interference compounds.  For
 cement, most specimens exhibited a
 decrease  in  UCS with increasing inter-
 ference concentration.

     By comparing the UCS results for the
 control specimens for different binders,
 it is evident that the cement specimens
 developed less strength than the lime/
 flyash or the cement/flyash specimens.
 Figure 2 however illustrates that
 increasing the concentrations of the
 interference chemical does not necessarily
 affect the different binders to the same
 degree.

 Portland Cement/Flyash

 The  addition of a 0.08 ratio of lead
 nitrate, copper nitrate, zinc nitrate, and
 phenol resulted over a 90 percent decrease
 in 28-day UCS.  The effect of sodium
 hydroxide, sodium sulfate, and copper
 nitrate addition was interesting because
 of the increase in UCS at the lower con-
 centrations  and decreases in UCS at the
 higher concentrations.  The addition of a
 0.02 ratio of sodium hydroxide resulted in
 a 22.8 percent increase in 28-day UCS
while the addition of a 0.08 ratio caused
 a 19.5 percent decrease in 28-day UCS.
The effect of hexachlorobenzene was not
 concentration dependent and resulted in a
 consistent 9 percent decrease in 28-day
UCS,  regardless of concentration.
                                                            -66-

-------
Lime/Flyash

The addition of a 0.08 ratio of lead
nitrate, copper nitrate, zinc nitrate,
sodium sulfate, and phenol resulted in an
80 percent decrease in 28-day UCS.  The
addition of trichloroethlene, hexachloro-
benzene, sodium hydroxide, and sodium
sulfate resulted in a gain in 28-day UCS
(51.0, 6.2, 71.1, 65.2 percent respec-
tively) at the 0.02 ratio; however, these
same compounds resulted in a decrease in
strength (34.4, 1.2, 3.6, and 81.8 percent
respectively) at a 0.08 ratio.  The addi-
tion of oil or grease at a 0.08 ratio
resulted in a 32 and 54 percent decrease
respectively, in 28- day UCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Several conclusions can be drawn that
characterize the effects of the inter-
ference materials investigated in this
project on the UCS of stabilized/  '
solidified waste materials.

     1.  The interference chemicals tested
had a measurable effect on the setting and
strength development properties of the
stabilized/solidified waste.  The magni-
tude of the effect depended on the type ,of
binder, the curing time, 'and the type and
concentration of the interfering compound.

     2.  Stabilized/solidified waste will
show decreases in UCS development with
increasing oil or grease concentrations.
     3.  Although the waste stabilized
with Portland cement resulted in lower
28-day strength development, it appears
that the concentration of interference
material had less of an effect on the UCS
development 'properties for the Portland
cement binder than for the Portland
cement/flyash or lime/flyash binders.

     4.  Zinc and phenol concentrations
above 5 percent resulted in marked
decreases in 28-day UCS development for
all the binders tested.

     5.  Sodium hydroxide tends to
increase the UCS at lower concentrations
and decreases the UCS at higher concentra-
tions for all binders.
     6.  The chlorinated hydrocarbons
evaluated in this study had little effect
on the UCS development properties.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The tests described and the resulting
data presented herein, unless otherwise
noted, were obtained from research con-
ducted by the U. S. Army Engineer Water-
ways Experiment Station and sponsored by
the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Lab-
oratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, under Inter-
agency Agreement DW96930146-01.
Mr. Carlton Wiles, Hazardous Waste Engi-
neering Research Laboratory was the EPA
project officer.  Permission to publish
this information was granted by the Chief
of Engineers and the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency.

REFERENCES

1.  Ashworth R.  1965.  "Some Investiga-
tions Into the Use of Sugar1 as an Admix-
ture to Concrete", Proceedings of the
Institute of Civil Engineering, London,
England.

2.  ASTM 1986.  Annual Book of ASTM Stan-
dards;  Construction, Volume 04.01,
Cement; Lime; Gypsum,  American Society
for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA.

3.  Chalasani, D., Cartledge, F. K.,
Eaton, H. C., Tittlebaum, M. E. and
Walsh, M. B.  1986.  "the Effects of Eth-
ylene Glycol on a Cement-Based Solidifica-
tion Process," Hazardous Wastes and
Hazardous Materials, vol 3, no. 2,
New York, NY.

4.  Cullinane M. J., Jones L. W., and
Malone P. G.  1986.  "Handbook for
Stabilization/Solidification of Hazardous
Waste", EPA/540/2-86/001, Hazardous Waste
Engineering Research Laboratory,
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH.
                                          -67-

-------
5.  Jones, J. N., Bricka, M. R., Myers,
T. E., and Thompson, D. W.  1985.
"Factors Affecting Stabilization/
Solidification of Hazardous Wastes," Pro-
ceedings:  International Conference on New
Frontiers for Hazardous Waste Management,
EPA/600/ 9-85-025, Hazardous Waste Engi-
neering Research Laboratory, U. S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH.

6.  Roberts, B. K.  1978.  "The Effect of
Volatile Organics on Strength Development
in Lime Stabilized Fly Ash Compositions,"
M. S. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA.

7.  Rosskopg P. A., Linton F. J., and
Peppier R. B.  1975.  "Effect of Various
Accelerating Chemical Admixtures on
Setting and Strength Development of Con-
crete", Journal of Testing and Evaluation,
Vol 3, No. 4.

8.  Smith, R. L.  1979.  "The Effect of
Organic Compounds on Pozzolanic
Reactions," I. U. Conversion Systems,
Report No. 57, Project No. 0145.
9.  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
1980.  Guide to the Disposal of Chemically
Stabilized and Solidified Waste, SW-872,
Office of Research and Development,
Municipal Environmental Research Labora-
tory, Cincinnati, OH.

10.  Walsh, M. B., Eaton, H. C.,
Tittlebaum, M. E., Cartledge, F. K.,  and
Chalasani, D.  1986.  "The Effect of  Two
Organic Compounds on a Portland Cement-
Based Stabilization Matrix," Hazardous
Waste & Hazardous Materials, Vol 3, No. 1,
New York, NY.

11.  Young J. F.  1972.  "A Review of the
Mechanisms of Set-Retardation of Cement
Pastes Containing Organic Admixtures",
Cement and Concrete Research, 2, No.  4
(July 1972).

12.  Young J. F., Berger R. L., and
Lawrence F. V.  1973.  "Studies on the
Hydration of Tricalcium Silicate Pastes.
Ill Influences of Admixtures on Hydration
and Strength Development", Cement and Con-
crete Research, 3, No. 6.
    TABLE 1. 28-DAY UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS A PERCENT OF CONTROL SPECIMEN
Interference
Chemical
Oil
Grease
Lead Nitrate
Copper Nitrate
Zinc Nitrate
Xrichloroethylene
Hexachlorobenzene
Sodium Hydroxide
Sodium Sulfate
Phenol
Portland Cement Binder
I/B/S Ratio
0.02 0.05 0.08
-20
-12
- 2
+91
+3
-28
-5
+14
-7
-22
-38
-25
+18
+181
-73
-36
-6
-33
-13
-26
-44
-45
+10
+4
-86
-27
+15
-52
-53
-54
Cement /Flyash
I/B/S Ratio
0.02 0.05 0.08
-8
-48
-51
+17
-47
-7
-10
+23
+23
-49
-28
-40
-75
-84
-93
-33
-9
+5
+16
-82
-42
-20
-97
-98
-95
-29
-10
-20
-64
-92
Lime/Flyash
I/B/S Ratio
0.02 0.05 0.08
—7
-7
-40
-48
-53
+51
+6
+1
+65
-65
-27
-27
-77
-48
-77
-20
+9
-7
+38
-88
-32
-54
-90
-98
-88
-34
-1
-4
-82
-96
1 All results reported as percent increase (+) or decrease from the control specimen
 rounded to nearest whole percent.
2 Interference to binder/sludge ratio.
                                          -68-

-------
                                           BINDER: CEMENT
                                           INTERFERENCE: NaOH
                                              '		1	—
                          12        16         20
                            CURVE TIME, DAYS
24
28
Figure 1.   Unconfined Compressive Strength as  a Function of Curing Time
                   and Interference Concentration
  800
                         0.02                 0.05
                              PHENOL RATIO
         0.08
   Figure 2.  Unconfined Compressive Strength for Three Binders as a
                Function of Interference Concentration
                                -69-

-------
  320
 55 300
 £280
 £ 260
 §240
 gJ220
 oi 200
 w 180
 tu 160
 | 140
 §120
 0100
 2 80
 H 60
 8 40
=> 20
          BINDER: CEMENT
          CURE TIME: 28 DAYS
    0
    OIL
                                                CU  CONTROL
                                                E3  0.02
                                                EZ3  0.05
                                                •  0.08
                                       I
           GREASE  Pb    Cu    Zn     TCE   HCB  NaOH Na2SO4 PHENOL
                      INTERFERENCE CHEMICAL RATIO
   Figure 3.  Effect of Interference Concentration on 28-day UCS for
                    Type I Portland Cement Binder
I
fe
tu
   900

   800

   700
  500
I
  400

  300

  200

  100
0 CONTROL cSlMEf^DAYS^8"


1

•;
:•
;;
•;
';
,'f
'/
>',
,'
r/t
rt<
V
V



1










n


n
! y
: /
. /

; /
; /
' '
\ /
', t
'. j




















7
/
E3 0.02 ic
1771 0.05 1C
H 0-08 1C


__









•
;*
;;


^;
^;
'•
'!
^;
;i









^






™
^
^















7m




7f
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
^ _ .


^/
x/
/
' /
/
I
1
t
1
1
t
1
/















T
/
^
/
',
/
j
.
f.
/
'
'
'
y













'•
J;










7]
/
/
//
/
/
/







i
A
A
/•
|







/
x
^
/
V
'y
)'
^







1
       OIL GREASE  Pb    Cu     Zn    TCE   HCB  NaOH Na2SO4 PHENOL
                      INTERFERENCE CHEMICAL RATIO
   Figure 4.  Effect of Interference Concentration on 28-day UCS for
                        Cement/Flyash Binder.
                                -70-

-------
1200
S 1100
•if
{= 1000
o
i 900
EC
M 800
UJ
> 700

2 600
cc
a.
2 500
Q 400
2 300
u.
| 200
8
§ 100
BINDER: LIME FLY ASH
- CURE TIME: 28





•v



_









^
!fti
/I

/I


~
>
^
,>
^

.;

;'



TV
1
i
1
1
1



^
.>
;^
I;
DAYS
















,





>
^
:J
:•














7
^
/

OIL GREASE Pb Cu
CU CONTROL
£3 0-02 1C

El 0.05 1C
H 0.08 1C


















-

H
.^ .
S
i
rq
; p
;
' —
> /
;/
:/
;/
; /
\/
I',/



^71















1
1
^|
I
I
•*
• r
; ^
< ^
; •
J

7
/
X
/
/
' /
(ff
~v/
* /
$/
1

p^












J
1.
<1
'l
1
/
/
t
I
/
X
'/
/
/








^
:>
[;

















1



















Zn TCE HCB NaOH Na2SO4 PHENOL
INTERFERENCE CHEMICAL RATIO
Figure 5. Effect
of Interference Concentration on 28-day UCS for
Lime/Flyash Binder.
        -71-

-------
                      MINE WASTE/OVERBURDEN ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES -
         CHARACTERIZATION AND SIMULATION OF MINE TAILINGS WEATHERING ENVIRONMENTS

                           Frank T. Caruccio, Gwendelyn Geidel
                                  Department of Geology
                               University of South Carolina
                                   Columbia, S.C. 29208


                                         ABSTRACT

     The prediction of mine drainage quality is based on the chemical weathering
attributes of the mine waste/overburden that is produced by the mining operation.  These
are generally assessed through overburden analyses, which fall into two broad categories,
static or dynamic techniques.  In the static tests, drainage quality projections are
based on whole rock analyses.  Alternatively, dynamic tests subject the samples to
simulated weathering tests and monitor the quality of the effluent produced.  Within
these two categories several mine waste/overburden analytical techniques are available,
each having advantages and disadvantages relative to the other.  An extensive computer
literature search identified the most popular analytical techniques and includedcolumn
leaching tests, humidified cells, soxhlet reactors, BCR initial and confirmed (bacteria)
tests, and acid/base accounting.  These analytical procedures were further structured to
evaluate the effect of alkaline pore water, air lock, and interstitial sulfide
reactivity.

    In a preliminary study, several mine waste/overburden analytical techniques were
evaluated to determine which one most closely approximates observed field conditions.
Fractions of an acid producing pyrite rich ore found at a gold mine in South Carolina
were contained in plastic tubs and exposed to the atmosphere.  The volume and quality of
the leachate produced after each rain event were related to the weight of the sample.
These field derived data provide the background against which the laboratory analyses of
splits of the samples were compared and evaluated.

    In the preliminary test, we found the finer the particle size, as prescribed by the
particular test, the greater the amount of acidity produced.  In essence, the acid
production potential is an artifact of the particular test used and, to a lesser degree,
the chemistry of the sample.
INTRODUCTION

     Acid  drainage is a  problem common  to
operations  that  expose  metallic disulfides
(most  commonly pyrite and marcasite) to
atmospheric conditions  and  oxidizing
environments.  In the process a highly
acidic, sulfate-iron enriched solution is
generated that may  severely impact  the
environment.

     The evaluation  of the acid production
potential of a sample is based on the
accurate  assessment of  the  sample's chemical
weathering  attributes.   These assessments
are  generally performed through mine
waste/overburden analyses,  which  can be
 grouped into two broad categories,  static or
 dynamic techniques.   In the Static  tests,
 whole rock analyses  are used to predict  mine
 drainage quality;  the assumption being the
 specific minerals  comprising the mine
 waste/overburden will react with water to
 produce varying degrees of alkalinity and
'acidity (the projected concentrations of
 which are balanced to determine the
 character of the drainage).  Alternatively,
 dynamic tests empirically determine leachate
 quality by subjecting the samples to
 simulated weathering conditions while
 monitoring the quality of the effluent
 produced.  Within  these two categories a
 variety of mine waste/overburden analytical
 techniques is available,  each having
 advantages and disadvantages relative to the
 other.
                                           -72-

-------
    Through a computer literature search,
examining 679 titles and 36 abstracts
dealing with various aspects of mine
drainage quality and predictive methods, we
identified several mine waste/overburden
analytical techniques widely used in the
United States and Canada, both in the coal
fields and sulfide mines.  These methods
include simulated weathering chamber tests
(column and humidity cells), soxhlet
reactors (infrequently used), biological
confirmation tests (commonly referred to as
B.C. Bacterial test), and whole rock
analyses (acid/base accounting, extensively
used in coal fields), and B.C. Research
Initial test (extensively used for  base
metal and gold mines in Canada and  western
U.S.).  The test involving the peroxide
oxidation of the sample has been recently
published and lacks widespread usage.  The
various tests are summarized and described
in Table 1.  .
    Many questions exist as to the accuracy
of the testing procedures and the ability of
the tests to adequately project the long-
term (decades)'chemical weathering
attributes of mine waste/overburden material
based on laboratory results obtained in
relatively short time periods (days to
weeks).  In addition, the variety ,of
environmental conditions relative to
climate, mining operation, enrichment or
recovering processing methods and manner of
disposal, have a. mitigating effect on the
oxidation of the sulfide and manner by which
the weathering products are mobilized from
the site.  For example, the acid potential
of some tailings will be greatly affected by
the manner of disposal.  Consider the fine
grained particle size of the tailings
material which will afford the sample with a
large water holding capacity (specific
retention) and create an "air lock" that
will effectively inhibit the transfer of
oxygen required for pyrite oxidation and
restrict the oxidation zone to the near
surface meter of the disposal site.
    The fact that many of the tailings piles
are located in areas where the
evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation,
requires that the analytical results
obtained from dynamic tests be reexamined in
the context of non-leaching environments.
Assuming oxidation of the sulfide mineral to
take place,  the dissolution and mobility of
the acid producing weathering products is
precluded by the lack of internal drainage.
    Further,  some of the processing plants
utilize slaked lime to enhance recovery of
the ore and in the procedure render the
discharge water/tailings mixture alkaline.
Other than the inhibitory effect that the
alkalinity has on pyrite oxidation, the
alkalinity of the pore water may have a
substantial neutralization potential and
effectively neutralize any acidity produced.

    Thus, other than the intrinsic chemical
nature of the tailings material, the
environmental factors that may play a role
in the overall weathering process and affect
the sample's acid production potential, must
be included as part of the assessment.

    The objectives of this study are 1) to
determine which of the variety of mine
waste/overburden analytical techniques
methods most closely approximate field
conditions and 2) to evaluate the effects of
porewater chemistry, "air lock" potential
and leaching interval (frequency) on acid
production potential.

METHODS

    The study was divided into two parts,
one dealing with the intrinsic nature of the
analytical procedures, normalizing the
environmental effects and utilizing a pyrite
rich ore from a gold mine, in South Carolina.
The second part deals with an e'valuatioft of
the environmental effects using selected
analytical procedures and mine tailings from
several copper mines in the West.

    We report on the results of the first
part of this study, evaluating the
analytical procedures, and describe the
strategy of the second part of the study
that wag initiated during the Spring of
1987, and for which preliminary results will
be presented during the Symposium.

First Part of the Study

    Samples for this study were collected
from a gold mine in South Carolina.  Idle
for about 40 years, this site was mined,
initially for gold and subsequently for
pyrite.  Acidic waters drain from a large
acid lake and small, highly acidic seeps
emanate from the talus and gangue heaps.

    For the first part of this study,
various size fractions of an acid producing
pyrite rich ore were contained in plastic
tubs (approximately 0.5 m x 0.5 m x 0.3 m
deep) and exposed to rainfall.
Representative splits from each were
collected for simulated weathering tests and
whole rock analysis.  The leachate generated
                                            -73-

-------
             TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF MINE WASTE/OVERBURDEN ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
                       COMMONLY USED IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA
Static Tests
      Method
Advantages
 Disadvantages
Whole Rock Analyses
     Acid/Base
     Accounting
     CD
     British
     Columbia
     Research
     (BCR) test
     (2)
Dynamic Tests

   • Soxhlet
     Reactor (3)
Whole rock analyses   Easy to perform,
completed on a        quick turn-around
pulverized sample.    time, useful in
Acid potential        areas that are
related to sulfur     acid or alkaline
content, neutral-     prone.
ization potential
determined by hot
acid digestion with
HC1.

Whole rock analysis   Same as above
completed on
pulverized sample.
Acid potential related
to sulfur content,
neutralization capacity
obtained by titration
with
                   Does not relate to
                   kinetic data.
                   Assumes parallel
                   release of acidity
                   and alkalinity which
                   provides inaccurate
                   results.
                   Same as above
Leachate generated    Easy to perform
on pulverized sample  quick turn-around
which is cycled in    time, purported
a soxhlet reactor.    kinetic data.
During interim,
sample is allowed
to dry at 105° C.
                   Expensive apparatus,
                   extremely aggressive
                   oxidation of sample
                   which is not related
                   to any natural
                   process.
Simulated
Weathering Tests

   • Humidity
     cells (4)
Crushed rock is
placed in humidified
atmosphere and
leached periodically.
Volume and character
of leachate related
to rock weight to
produce alkaline/
acid production
potential.
Produces kinetic
data, rates of
acidity per unit
weight of sample
obtained,
approximates field
conditions.
Long time required,
large data base
generated.
                                           -74-

-------
    • Column
      Weathering
      test (5)
      Beaker
      Leachate
      test (1)
      BCR
      Bacteria
      test (6)
      Peroxide
      test (7)
Field sample placed
in large columns and
and leached period-
ically. Leachate is
analyzed and related
to rock weight.

Pulverized sample is
placed in water and
chemistry monitored
through time.

Pulverized sample is
oxidized in presence
of bacteria.  pH
monitored through .
time, sample
continuously shaken.

Pulverized sample
is oxidized in the
presence of hydrogen
peroxide and rate
of pH change
monitored through
time.
Best approximator
of field
conditions.
Simulates sub-
merged conditions
of mine waste,
some kinetic data.

Easy to use,
incorporates
bacteria in
reactions.
May be completed
in field, very
rapid results.
Same as above, in
addition large volume
of samples required,
channelization
problem encountered.
Does not allow for
easy transfer of
oxygen which may be
rate limiting.

Data identify sample
as acid producing;
results cannot be
correlated or related
to kinetic test data.
Sample pH response is
to be calibrated against
larger sample to translate
data to field conditions;
indirect testing of
alkaline samples.
is collected and analyzed for volume, pH,
specific conductance, acidity, and sulfate.
In turn, these data are converted to
milligrams of acid produced per kilogram of
sample and provides the basis against which
the results of the laboratory overburden
analyses are compared and evaluated.

Field Tub-Control Samples

    The tests performed to date utilized
three different sized populations (2.5 cm or
small-S, 2.5-5 cm or medium-M, and 7-10 cm
or large-L) selected from the pyrite rich
ore found at the site.

    The plastic tubs, containing known
sample weights, were placed in an open
field, one meter above the ground.
Following a rain event, the amount of
rainfall (cm) and the volume of effluent
(liters) produced by the tubs (which drain
into sealed plastic barrels placed beneath
the tubs) were recorded.  An aliquot of
effluent was collected and analyzed within
24 hours for specific conductance, pH (hot
and cold), acidity, and sulfate.

    The analyses, expressed as
concentrations 1 (mg/1), are converted to
loads (mg) of component produced by
multiplying the concentrations by volume of
the effluent.  In turn, these loads may be
normalized for particular sample weights to
                            a  kg  base  and  percentage  sulfur.  Plotted
                            versus  time, cumulative acid  loads  produced
                            per kg  of  sample,  yield rates of  acid
                            produced against which the  laboratory
                            analyses are being compared and evaluated.

                            Column  Leaching

                               Samples of known weight and size were
                            placed  in  plexiglass columns  of 9 cm
                            diameter and 30 cm length.  Column  S
                            contained  3090 g of sample  S  and  filled the
                            column  to  approximately 4/5 its length (23
                            cm).  Column M contained  2181 g of  sample M
                            and filled the column to  a  height of 18 cm.
                            Column  L contained 2089 g of  sample L,
                            filled  to  a height of 17  cm.   Each  column
                            drained into a 1000 ml sample bottle.  The
                            top of  each column was sealed with  plastic-
                            wrap  to prevent contamination and to
                            maintain humid conditions between leachings.

                               The columns were leached  every  seven
                            days  by spraying the top  of the column with
                            500 ml  of  deionized water and allowed to
                            drain for  12 hours. The  leachate collected
                            was analyzed for specific conductance, pH
                            (hot  and cold), acidity,  and  sulfate
                            concentrations.

                            Humidity Cell  Weathering  Tests

                               Samples of known weight (approximately
                            200 grams  (g)) and crushed  to pass  4
                                            -75-

-------
               millimeters (mm) were placed onto a filter
               paper in separate chambers.   Duplicate
               humidity cells chambers were constructed for
               each sample size (S,  M, L),  for a total of
               six chambers.   The chamber was a plastic
               cylindrical pan, 7 cm deep and 15.5 cm in
               diameter.  A plastic lid prevented
               contamination and evaporation.  Humidified
               air, generated by bubbling air through water
               in a closed aquarium, is circulated into the
               chamber to maintain saturated conditions.
               The chamber is opened only to add water
               during the leaching cycle.

                   Samples were leached every seven days by
               slowly pouring 100 ml of deionized water
               onto the sample and stirring for one minute.
               Following, the lid was replaced and the
               water - rock mixture was drained through a
               basal outlet into a graduated cylinder for
               12 hours.  The leachate collected was
               analyzed for specific conductance, pH (hot
               and cold), acidity, and sulfate.

               Soxhlet Extractors

                   Pulverized (to pass 125U) samples of
               known weight were placed in  separate
               cellulose extraction thimbles and stored in
               a drying oven at 100° C.  Every seven days
               the samples (in thimble) were placed in
               separate soxhlet reactors and 250 ml of
               deionized water was circulated through the
               sample for 4 hours.  The heat source was a
               GLAS-COL heating mantle (run at 120 volts).
               After 4 hours, the heating mantle was turned
               off and the soxhlet reactor  allowed to cool
               to room temperature.   The leached sample was
               returned to the drying oven  and stored at
               100° C in preparation for the next leaching
               cycle.  The effluent collected in the
               soxhlet was analyzed for specific
               conductance,  pH (hot and cold),  acidity,  and
               sulfate.

               B.C.R.
                   This test was run in triplicate,  three
               equal weight pulverized (to  pass  125y)
               portions of each sample (S,  M,  L)  were
               weighed out and  each placed  in  separate 300
               ml Erlenmeyer flasks to which were added  70
               ml of 9K medium  (8).  Sufficient  sulfuric
               acid was added,  if necessary, to  bring the
               initial pH to 2.5.  The flasks  were
               continuously shaken for 4 hours to
               homogenize the sample and medium,  and
               innoculated with 5 ml of viable Thiobacillus
               ferrooxidans culture.   The pH was  monitored
               every day for the first three days and every
 other day thereafter.  This was continued
 until the pH readings maintained a constant
 value (indicating cessation of
 microbiological activity) or until the pH
 dropped to 1.8.  At this point, half of the
 weight of the original sample was added and
 the sample agitated for 24 hours.  If the pH
 was then greater than 3.5 the test indicates
 the samples to be non-acid.  Otherwise, an
 additional sample portion (again half the
 weight of the sample) is added and the
 sample agitated for 24 hours.  At this point
 the pH was either greater than 4.0 or less
 than 3.5 (the sample is an acid producer),
 the test was to be terminated.  Samples with
 pH falling between 3.5 and 4;0 were to be
 shaken for  48 hours  and  a final pH
 recorded (9).

     The shaker table and sample flasks were
 housed within a plastic  chamber that  trapped
 the heat generated by the operating shaker
 table and maintained conducive to bacterial
 activity (30-35° C).

 RESULTS

     The results of the tests are presented
 for the first 70-80  days of the study.  With
'the exception of the acid/base accounting
 data and the B.C.R.  Bacteria test results,
 all leachate data have been adjusted  and
 normalized  to cumulative mg of acid produced
 per 1 kg of sample.   These acid production
 trends are  shown in  Figures 1-7 and
 summarized  in Table  2.  The laboratory
 analyses of the samples spanned an  82 day
 time period; the data presented in  Table 2
 are for an  80 day interval.

     For control tubs, humidified cells, and
 column tests the time scale (x-axis)  is in
 days.  The  soxhlet samples were leached
 weekly for  four hours at a time, and
 accordingly, the time scale for the soxhlet
 experiment  is in hours.

     The tub-field data (Fig. 1) show a
 nearly identical behavior between samples L
 and S.  Sample M exhibited more than  double
 the cumulative acidity of S and L throughout
' much of the 80 day period.  All three curves
 show a pronounced decline in acid production
 for the last two weeks of this period,

     The results of the column tests most
 closely parallel those in the field,  in
 terms of both cumulative acidities  and
 intersample variation (Fig.  2).   The
 increases in cumulative  acidity were  more
                                                          -76-
_

-------
TABLE 2.  NORMALIZED CUMULATIVE ACIDITIES
          FOR VARIOUS ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
Sample Analyses
Cumulative Acidity
  (mg/kg/80 days)
Control (Tub)
Column Test
Humidity Cell

Soxhlet
     250  -   750
     300  -   695
   1,600  - 2,100

  11,000 - 15,500 mg/kg
           PER 50 HOURS
linear for the column tests than for those
in the field.  This is an artifact of the
constant periodicity and leaching volumes
which were controlled in the laboratory
tests.

    The simulated weathering chamber tests
demonstrated much less inter—sample
variation, though the two M samples had
higher cumulative acidities towards the end
of the 80 day leaching period (Fig. 3).  The
humidity cell tests clearly over-predicted
the cumulative acidity found in the field.

    The results of the soxhlet tests exhibit
a different inter-sample variation than
those of the other lab and field results.
While sample M greatly outproduces sample S,
both duplicate L samples attain greater
cumulative acidities than M towards the end
of the peripd.  Cumulative acidities for the
soxhlet extractors are an order of magnitude
greater than those found in the field (Fig.
4)..

DISCUSSION

    Of the simulated weathering tests it
appears that the column tests more closely
approximate the quality of the leachate
derived under natural conditions.  The
humidity cell overestimates the amount of
acidity, while the soxhlet greatly
overestimates the acidity.  The observed
variations in acid production occurring
between the control and humidity cell are
explained by differences in grain size (the
humidity cell sample utilizes sample sizes
of 2-4 mm).  The soxhlet utilizes pulverized
samples (125y) and, in addition, subjects
the samples to 105° C drying temperatures at
weekly intervals, generating skewed and
exaggerated results.
     The whole rock analyses tests (B.C.R.
 initial and Acid/Base Accounting) indicated
 potentially acidic samples.  Because the
 samples used in this study are pyrite-
 enriched - calcareous material deficient,  we
 should not expect otherwise.

     The B.C.R. bacteria tests, in essence,
 also confirmed the samples to be acid.  In
 all sets of tests, the  pH was reduced from
.2.6 to 1.7 in 4 to 17 days (Figures  5-7).
 The biological confirmation test results are
 difficult to interpret in either a
 quantitative or comparative manner.   The
 data generated are pH (the test parameter)
 versus time (days) and the results indicate
 the variability between triplicates  of a
 particular sample to be as great as  that
 found between samples.

     For the B.C.R. tests the parameter
 monitored is pH and at.the levels measured
 for these tests the system is buffered.
i Accordingly,  there is no indication  of the
 amount of acid produced, and the B.C.R. test
 data (which monitors pH) cannot be compared
 to acid production rates (measured by
 titration with a standard base).  The test,
 in its present form, is primarily
 qualitative in nature.

     In summary, for the tub,  column, and
 humidified cell tests, it appears that the
 acid production potential derived from a
 particular overburden analytical technique
 is more a function of the sample size
 required to perform the particular test than
 the chemistry of the sample.   In the soxhlet
 tests further comminution of the sample,
 coupled with an unnatural aggressive
 oxidizing environment, produces orders of
 magnitude more acid than the other leaching
 •tests.  All things considered, the column
 tests more closely approximate the observed
 field results than the other analytical
 tests.

 SECOND PHASE OF THE STUDY

     The analytical techniques used in this
 study can also be used to evaluate the
 various environmental factors affecting
 leachate quality.  Using copper mine
 tailings as the test sample,  heavy liquid
 separation methods are used to concentrate
 the heavy mineral fraction (which includes
 the sulfides and is the acid producing
 component).  In turn, the heavy fraction is
 rinsed with acetone and deionized water and
 analyzed with the soxhlet reactors.
                                            -77-

-------
Inasmuch as the tailings will not be crushed
further, the variability in acid production
by sample size is eliminated.  Thus, the
acid producing component of the sample can
be evaluated.

    Using the weathering chambers, tailings
samples as received and rinsed with
deionized water, can be tested to evaluate
the effect that pore water chemistry and
matrix mineralogy have on the tailings'
potential to produce acid.  This will
simulate the conditions expected to occur at
the near surface environment of tailings
ponds.  In addition to a humidified air
environment, the test may also be structured
to simulate oxidation processes occurring
under semi-arid conditions and in the
presence of ultra-violet light.

    To test the effect of "air lock" as
might occur at depth within the tailings
ponds, the column tests can be used with
rinsed and un-rinsed samples.  The leachate
qualities derived from the columns and
weathering chambers can be compared to
evaluate the magnitude of the environmental
factors as thought to occur near surface and
at depth within tailings ponds.

    Finally, the leaching interval is
controlled and the mass tranfer of water
documented (i.e. volume of water added and
leachate volume are recorded), which, in
turn, can be related to the mass transfer of
water through a tailings pond in response to
various climatic conditions.  Given an
evaporation loss, precipitation rate and
effective porosity, pore volume
displacements can be calculated and related
to geochemical mobilities within the pond
body.

    This phase of the study is currently
underway and preliminary results should be
available for presentation at the Symposium.
REFERENCES

1.  Sobek, A. A., W. A. Schuller, J. R.
    Freeman, and R. M. Smith, 1978.  Field
    and laboratory methods applicable to
    overburdens and minesoils.  EPA-600/2-78-
    54, National Technical Information
    Service, Springfield, Virginia.
2.  Bruynestein, A. and D.  Duncan,  1979.
    Determination of acid production
    potential of waste materials.   AIME,  A-
    79-29.

3.  Renton, J., R. Hildalgo,  and D. Streib,
    1973.  Relative acid-production
    potential of coal.  W.V.  Geological and
    Ecological Survey, Bulletin No. 11.

4.  Caruccio, Frank T., 1968.  An evaluation
    of factors affecting acid mine drainage
    production and the ground water
    interactions in selected  areas of
    western Pennsylvania.  Proceedings of
    the Second Symposium on Coal Mine
    Drainage Research, Monroeville,
    Pennsylvania, pp!07-151.

5.  Hood, W. and 0. Oerter, 1984.   A
    leaching column method for predicting
    effluent quality from surface mines.
    Proceedings of the Symposium on Surface
    Mining Hydrology, Sedimentology, and
    Reclamation. pp271-277.

6.  Bruneysteyn, A. and R.  Hackle,  1984.
    Evaluation of acid production potential
    of mining waste material.  Mining and
    the Environment, Vol. 4.

7.  Finkleman, R. and D. Giffin, 1986.
    Hydrogen peroxide oxidation:  an
    improved method for rapidly assessing
    acid-generating potential of sediments
    and sedimentary rocks.  Reclamation and
    Revegetation Research,  Vol. 5,  pp521-
    534.

8.  Kleinmann, R. L. and P. Erickson, 1983.
    Control of acid drainage  from coal
    refuse using anionic surfactants.
    Bureau of Mines, Rep. Inv. 8847,
    Department of the Interior.

9.  Bruynesteyn, A. and R.  Hackle,  1984.
    Evaluation of acid production potential
    of mining waste materials.  Minerals and
    the Environment, Vol. 4,  pp5-8.
                                            -78-

-------
     HAILE MINE STUDY:  TUB EXPERIMENT
                CUMULATIVE ACJOflY vs. TIME
                            HAILE MINE STUDY:  COLUMN EXPERIMENT
                                                      °
                    HUE Hoy.)
                   *  MEDIUM
  160


X  LARGE
          Figure   1
                                                     fc
                                                                          CUMULATIVE AOOOY v». °T1UE
   40


a  SMALL
                                     Figure   2
  HAILE MINE STUDY:  LEACHING  EXPERIMENT
          Figure 3


         BUCTEWLCONTOLEIPBiiUpir
2.4


2.3


2i


il-


10


15-
1.7
        •I   6  S  10  12  14  16  18 20


        c S,    ,T1«. S.  .   .
                            HAILE MINE STUDY:   SOXHLET EXPERIMENT
                                         cuuuunvEAcnxn- v>, HME
                                     Figure   4
                                              E*ClH!W.'cONIH)LEXFBi)»e(r (uffiuu)
                                                                                                  V  IARGE-2
                   TIE (C«S)
            p III   t 111    < HI
                                                        9  11  13  15  17  19  21
                                                                                         THE (MIS)
                                                                                     u   t  a    i a
                                                                             .      Q U   I-  U3   9 UR

   Figure  5- pH vs  Time (S)   Figure 6-pH vs  Time (M)      Figure 7- pH vs  Time  (L)
                                                 -79-

-------
                THE EFFECTS OF OVERBURDEN PRESSURE AND HYDRAULIC GRADIENT ON
                THE PERFORMANCE OF MODEL SOIL-BENTONITE SLURRY CUTOFF  WALLS

                          Richard M. McCandless and Andrew Bodocsi
                     Department of Civil and Environmental  Engineering
                                  University of Cincinnati
                                  Cincinnati, Ohio   45221


                                          ABSTRACT

     Model soil-bentonite cutoff walls roughly 508 mm (20 inches) in diameter,  559 mm
(22 inches) in height and 102 mm (4 inches) thick were constructed and tested in an
instrumented tank.  The effects of overburden pressure (vertical consolidation)  and
hydraulic gradient (horizontal consolidation) were investigated followed by tests to
evaluate the potential  for closure of artificial windows representing  small  pockets of
entrapped bentonite slurry in the backfill.

     The average hydraulic conductivity of one model was measured for  three hydraulic
gradients under each of three applied overburden pressures.  Decreases in conductivity
were observed for incremental increases in both overburden pressure and hydraulic gradi-
ent as well as their combined effect.  The tests were interrupted on two occasions by
hydrofracture near the base of the model.  A reduction in effective stress with increased
depth in the model wall was evidenced by unit weight, water content and vane shear
strength data.  By incrementally increasing overburden pressure it was possible to "heal"
two slot-like windows in a subsequent wall suggesting that in situ consolidation of the
backfill may serve to eliminate minor as-built or chemically-induced hydraulic defects  in
real slurry walls.
INTRODUCTION

     Slurry trench cutoff walls were first
used in the United States in the early
1940's.  Since that time, their use has
become more widespread and now includes
application as hydraulic barriers to
control the movement of contaminated
groundwater from hazardous waste disposal
sites.  Each application is unique and
requires site-specific engineering evalua-
tion.  Nevertheless, the current state-of-
the-art involves fundamental concepts,
performance criteria, and methods common
to all applications.

     One area of special interest deals
with questions of in situ consolidation
of soil-bentonite backfill after place-
ment.  If significant consolidation does
occur after construction, the average
hydraulic conductivity of the barrier may
be significantly different from that meas-
ured in the laboratory during the design
and construction phases.  Moreover, the
finished barrier may have an inherent
ability to eliminate minor construction
defects (via consolidation) given suffi-
cient time.  Field observations suggest
that only limited in situ consolidation
may occur (evidenced by lack of subsidence
of the backfill  surface) which, in turn,
suggests that friction between'the backfill
and the soils comprising the walls of the
cutoff trench may strongly affect the ver-
tical distribution of effective stress in
the backfill.

     An experimental tank in which model
soil-bentonite walls could be constructed
and tested under various hydraulic and
surcharge loading conditions was construct-
                                           -80-

-------
ed for this study.  The tank accomodates
circular cutoff walls roughly 559 mm
(22 inches) in height, 102 to 152 mm (4 to
6 inches) thick, and up to 610 mm (24 inch-
es) in diameter.  The tank is of stainless
steel  construction and employs a pneumatic
bladder system to vertically confine and
consolidate the model wall during permea-
tion in the horizontal direction.  A sche-
matic of the system is shown as Figure 1.
Although relatively small and constructed
using non-typical methods (described
later), the models were representative
of real soil-bentonite slurry walls in
most other respects.

CONSTRUCTION AND TEST METHODS

     A total of three model walls were
constructed and tested during the course of
this study.  The first model was used for
preliminary "shakedown" testing of the
system.  The second model was built to
study the effects of surcharge pressure  .
and hydraulic gradient on hydraulic con-
ductivity.  Testing involved the sequen-
tial application of three hydraulic
gradients (i = 21, 42, 83) under effective
overburden pressures of 41.4, 82.7 and
165.5 kPa (6, 12, 24 psi) as measured at
the surface of the wall.  The third wall
was used to investigate the surcharge pres-
sure necessary to close two slot-like win-
dows during permeation.  The remainder of
this article describes the latter two
models and the methods and results.

     Both models comprised a soil-bentonite
backfill designed for a target hydraulic
conductivity of 1.0 x 10~7 cm/sec under
nominal levels of consolidation and low
hydraulic gradients.  The backfill consist-
ed of 1% ordinary (unaltered) bentonite
in a base soil of approximately two-thirds
fine to medium brick sand and one-third
clay of moderate plasticity (CL classifi-
cation per USCS) which contained minor
amounts of silt and fine sand.

     The model walls were constructed
between two concentric PVC (polyyinyl
chloride) slip forms representing the walls
of a circular cutoff trench.  The forms
were positioned in the tank and backfilled
with clean fine sand in 102 mm (4 inch)
lifts creating an empty 102 mm (4 inch)
wide annular space between the forms.  This
space was, then filled with a 5% bentonite:
water slurry (weight-.volume basis) compris-
ing the same bentonite .used in the soil-
bentonite mix.  The soil-bentonite backfil-
ling operation varied slightly for differ-
              PERMEANT RESERVOIR   j

               (typ.)
   f      |   PORE PRESSURE
         1     PROBE
                     1
                      I  V8B
                     e e—•
                  I C3t=3t=!
                     ___ ; ___ _£ ----
                     I PVC MEMBRANE ] ___

                          BEARING   T
             DRAIN
                                            AIR PRESSURE  LINE

                                            PERMEANT FLOW LINE
                   Figure 1.  Schematic of the slurry wall tank system.
                                           -81-

-------
ent models but generally involved raising
both forms about 102 mm (4 inches), allow-
ing the bentom'te:water slurry to penetrate
the sand and form a surface filtration
slurry seal, and then backfilling with
soil-bentonite using a pressurized tremie
pipe.  This general procedure was repeated
until the surface of the model wall was
level with the surface of the center core
of sand (sand encircled by the model wall)
and outer ring of sand (sand encircling the
model wall).

     After construction, the model was
readied for testing by installing a com-
bination membrane/hydraulic cutoff over its
surface and positioning concentric load-
bearing plates over each element of the
model (core sand, soil-bentonite wall,
outer ring of sand).  This arrangement
allowed for differential loading and con-
solidation of the soil-bentonite wall
relative to the adjacent sand bodies.  The
surface membrane/hydraulic cutoff over the
top of the soil-bentonite wall was designed
to promote horizontal flow through the wall
during permeation and eliminate leakage
over the top of the model.  The cutoff
system comprised three concentric PVC rings
bonded to the PVC membrane and forced into
the surface of the soft soil-bentonite.  A
similar configuration involving two cutoff
rings was used on the bottom of the model
as well.  Schematics of both the top and
bottom cutoffs appear in Figure 2.

     The typical testing procedure used in
evaluating the effects of overburden pres-
sure and gradient involved saturation of
the sand elements of the model, application
of a selected surcharge pressure, consoli-
dation of the soil-bentonite wall under the
applied surcharge (time estimated from con-
ventional consolidation tests performed on
the backfill material), application of the
design hydraulic head pressure at both the
top and bottom of the saturated center core
of sand (Figure 2.), and the measurement of
hydraulic head and volumetric inflow at
prescribed time intervals.

     This test procedure was performed for
the three hydraulic gradients under each of
the three overburden pressures reported
earlier.  In each case, equilibrium flow
conditions were established before applying
a new set of test conditions.

     Similar procedures were used in the
construction and testing of the third model
  b)
Figure 2.  Schematic of a)  surface membrane
           and upper hydraulic cutoff,
           b) lower hydraulic cuttoff.
wall to evaluate the closure of artificial
slot-like windows via surcharge pressure.
The slots were intended to model  macro-
defects such as small pockets of entrapped
slurry remaining after construction of the
wall.  Two slots approximately 7.9 mm (5/16
inch) wide by 1.6 mm (1/16 inch)  high were
cut into the third wall after preconsolida-
tion under an effective overburden pressure
of 41.4 kPa (6.0 psi) as measured at the
surface of the wall.  The windows were
positioned 180° apart at a depth of about
127 mm (5 inches) below the top of the
wall.  Both ends of each slot were covered
with a fabric-wrapped wire mesh to prevent
washing the core sand into the slot during
permeation.  The test procedure involved
incremental increase of overburden (sur-
charge) pressure until the slots were
effectively closed as evidenced by a return
to the predetermined baseline hydraulic
conductivity of the model.

     The method used to compute hydraulic
conductivity was the same for the over-
burden pressure/hydraulic gradient series
of tests and the single window closing
test.  Using measured values of total head
and the geometric constants of the models,
the average hydraulic conductivity was
computed using the falling head relation-
ship:
                                           -82-

-------
             a«L
          ,
          k =
where: k = hydraulic conductivity  (cm/sec)
       a = cross-sectional area of permeant
             reservoir  (cm2)
       L = thickness of the wall (cm)
       A = cross-sectional area of the wall
             perpendicular  to  the direction
             of  flow  (cm2)
       hg = initial total hydraulic head  (cm)
       h} = final  total hydraulic head  (cm)
       t = time interval between two read-
             ings  (sec)

RESULTS AND  DISCUSSION

Overburden Pressure  and Hydraulic  Gradient

      The testing  of  the second soil-benton-
ite wall, termed  Sequence  2 tests, involved
staged increases  of  overburden pressure  and
hydraulic gradient over a  period of six
months, followed  by  sampling  and measure-
ment of unit weight, vane  shear strength
and moisture content as a  function of depth
in  the model.   Figure  3 represents a com-
posite of Sequence 2 hydraulic conductivity
results for  the six  sets.of test conditions
indicated (2(a) through 2(g)).  All six
curves are of similar  shape and for the
most part their relative positions present
a logical picture of decreasing equilibrium
hydraulic conductivity with increasing
hydraulic gradient for any given
overburden pressure.   Note however, that
test 2(c) is missing,  test 2(f) was termi-
nated prior  to  achieving equilibrium condi-
tions, and that data for tests 2(f) and
2(g) do not  conform  to the otherwise
logical trend described above.  The expla-
nation appears  in Figure 4 which presents
a chronological summary of the final equi-
librium conductivities measured for each
set of test  conditions.

      In the  typical  test,  the wall model
: exhibited a  high  initial hydraulic conduc-
tivity represented by  an open triangle,
then dropped off  and gradually approached
the final equilibrium  value designated by
an  open circle.  Two incidences of hydro-
fracture, one resulting from  a ruptured
surcharge bladder (loss of applied over-
burder pressure), are  indicated by solid
triangles.

      The first  incidence of hydrofracture
occurred near the end  of test 2(b) strong-
ly  suggesting that the effective stress  at
some point in the model  (presumably near
its base) was less than  the effective over-
burden pressure.  Because of the hydrofrac-
ture, test 2(c) was not  attempted.  In-
stead, test 2(d) involving a doubling of
applied overburden pressure and a reduction
in hydraulic pressure was initiated in an
attempt to heal the first hydrofracture.
Test 2(f) also suffered  a rupture of the,
surcharge bladder resulting in a second
hydrofracture of the soil-bentonit.e wall.

     To estimate the extent of damage,
test 2(g') was conducted at overburden and
hydraulic pressures matching those of test
2(d).  As shown in Figure 4, the results of
test 2(g') did not match those of test 2(d),
having an equilibrium hydraulic conductiv-
ity almost an order of magnitude higher.
These data clearly indicate permanent dam-
age of the model as a result of the two
cases of hydrofracture.   Results for test
2(g), however, illustrate that a large
increment in surcharge pressure can par-
tially offset the effects of hydrofracture.

     In the field, both  vertical and hori-
zontal consolidation of  the backfill occur
simultaneously.  The equilibrium conductiv-
ity.values reported in Figure 4 may there-
fore be regarded as representing the com-
bined effect of both vertical (surcharge)
and horizontal (hydraulic gradient) consol-
idation stresses for the test conditions
applied.

     Except for test 2(g), the data sug-
gest a logical trend of  decreasing equili-
brium hydraulic conductivity as a func-
tion of either increasing surcharge pres-
sure (compare results of tests 2(b) and
2(e)) or increasing hydraulic gradient
compare results of test  2(a),(b) and 2(d),
(e),(f)).  Although the  observed trend is
logical, the data fail to reflect the
correct magnitude of change in hydraulic
conductivity between successive tests in
several cases.  For example, the actual
equilibrium hydraulic conductivity for test
2(d) (and therefore also for all subsequent
tests) is lower than reported.  As describ-
ed earlier, the reason is that hydrofrac-
ture permanantly changed the properties of
the wall, thus artificially offsetting
groups of data measured  after hydrofrac-
ture from other groups of data measured
before hydrofracture.  In terms of inter-
nally consistent groups  of data then, the
following two sets of tests may be recog-
nized:  2(a),(b) and 2(d),(e),(f) (as
                                           -83-

-------
                o   -r
                a
                o
                o
                 cc
                 Q
                   10 •
;
5
-
	
—
5
—
—

	 	
r
^
—
—
a
~~
)








\
tU

l\
\I\J
V\ v
'C\








TEST SEQUENCE

2


Effective
Overburden Hydraulic Gradient
TEST Pressure Pressure
(psi) (psi)
2(a) 6 3 20.8
2(b) o o 41.6
2(d) 12 3 20.8
2(e) 12 6 41.6
2(f) 12 12 83.2
2(g) 24 3 20?8
^r^^

\
.^^-2(1)



A>
f\-^
1 X--
V
\^.". —




—• ~2(d)
\x\
2(g>












/2<9)











                        0      200    400    600     800    1000    1200

                                        TIME (HOURS)

                       Figure 3.  Sequence 2 hydraulic conductivity
                                  test results
projected).
     The equilibrium values shown in Figure
4 represent the combined effect of vertical
and horizontal consolidation.  Plotted in
terms of combined (total) vertical and hor-
izontal effective stress with the corre-
sponding permeability data on an arithmetic
scale, these same data would appear as
shown in Figure 5.  The plot very closely
resembles a typical  void ratio versus pres-
sure curve obtained from a conventional
consolidation test.   The interpretation of
the data is also similar in that beyond a
certain point, the rate of change in perme-
ability (or void ratio) greatly diminishes
for a unit change in total stress, i.e.,
the material becomes more difficult to con-
solidate the more consolidated it is.
Although the two sets of data (2(a),(b) and
2(d),(e),(f)) are not strictly compatible
as explained earlier, they do reflect a
logical and expected trend, and permit the
following general  observations:

• Test set 2(d) ,(e),(f), exhibits greater
changes in hydraulic conductivity for the
same change in hydraulic pressure reflect-
ing the reconsolidation  or "healing" of a
soil-bentonite wall that had been damaged
(hydrofractured) to an undetermined extent.

• The change in equilibrium hydraulic con-
ductivity due to either  a unit change in
hydraulic head pressure  or a unit change
in surcharge pressure can be on the same
order of magnitude, i.e., the effect of
horizontal (gradient-induced) consolidation
can be as large as the effect of vertical
(surcharge) consolidation for a comparable
pressure change.

     After the completion of Sequence 2
test 2(g) reported in Figure 4, the tank
                                           -84-

-------
was opened to permit visual  inspection of
conditions and allow for sampling and test-
ing of the consolidated backfill.  The sam-
pling included undisturbed tube samples and
water content samples of the soil-bentonite
at various locations and depths.  Testing
involved measurements of unit weight, vane
shear strength, and water content.  Data
for these parameters appear as a function
of depth in Figure 6.

     Despite the semi-qualitative nature
of these data (due to hydrofracturing of
the model) they clearly demonstrate that
the effective overburden stress applied
at the surface of the wall did not act
over the full depth of the wall.  In other
words, overburden stress was dissipated
with depth, with the net result that the
final values of dry density and vane
shear strength are highest near the top
of the wall (highest degree of consolida-
tion) and final water content is highest
at the base of the wall  (lowest degree of
eonsolidation).

Window Closure

     The probability of "windows" existing
in a field-scale slurry wall, whether re-
presenting an as-built condition related to
materials or construction technique, or
resulting from long-term exposure to chemi-
cals, is not known.  Presumably, undetected
subsurface windows might develop due to en-
trapment of slurry or sloughed trench wall
materials within the backfill during the
backfilling operation.  According to Evans
et al.t1) the probability of such entrap-
ments along the surface of the advancing
soil-bentonite "mud wave" is high.  More-
over, limited evidence of these types of
"windows" was observed during the post-test
inspection of the model.

     After Sequence 2 testing a third wall
-s

i
..~

—


-7




-8


-9
<




\



, .
^D









r

J,





1
e/3 2(b)
8/6






3






0 8




1


\
}
\
\
\

I
2
12/3


\

\
\
) ** * * \ ?














1
•. 2 C 1 ) llj
\12/12 2(8)

! 0 1

iO 1


. EXPLANATION
surcharge pressure, psl
»• 6/3 -* — ^
hydraulic pressure, psi'
w— initial

©— equilibrium
V~ hydrof racture
9 — surcharge bladder
rupture

0 — projected to

equilibrium

10
  a
  z
  o
  o
                       TIME (Days)
                    Figure 4.  Chronology and results of Sequence 2
                               hydraulic conductivity tests.
                                           -85-

-------
     t  90

     P
     u
     2  40
        20 -
               2(a)
                                (d)
                                ^
                                  \
                                    \
                                         (a)
                                         V
l
18
                                                    l
                                                   21
                        t2        IS

                        COMBINED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL

                        EFFECTIVE CONSOLIDATION PRESSURE. Pll
 r
24
     Figure 5.  Equilibrium  hydraulic conductivity as a function
                of combined  effective overburden (vertical) and
                hydraulic  (horizontal)  pressure.
DEPTH
(In.)

|

4-

1 2-



DRY
1 1







UNIT WE
(Ib/ft3)
4 116 11




/
•
X-"



• — .
*-
->'
S
K.«




._-}
^m^.
X
X





r*"
/
t •



WATER CONTENT (%)
14 16 18 20









«• I
vl
«•
\
i





\
\
\
\>





\









note:  symbols designate sample  location  along  different imaginary vertical
       lines through model
     Figure 6.  Results  of  tests  on  soil-bentonite backfill  after
                completion  of  Sequence 2  testing.
                                  -86-

-------
was constructed for the  window closing
test.  Before the slot windows were formed
the new wall was preconsolidated under an
effective overburden  pressure of 41.4 kPa
(6 psi) and  a hydraulic  pressure of 20.7
kPa (3 psi)  representing a gradient of
20.8.  Baseline (no window) results for
test 3(a) are shown in Figure 7.  The
hydraulic conductivity versus time curve
has the typical shape of the previous
Sequence 2 data shown in Figure 3.

    After establishing a baseline or ref-
erence value of hydraulic conductivity, the
two slot windows were formed at the loca-
tions and depths previously described.
Overburden pressure was then  gradually
increased causing the apparent  hydraulic
conductivity of the model to  decrease
until the windows had been  effectively
closed as evidenced by a  return to the
measured baseline conductivity.  These
data also appear in Figure  7  and show
that the average conductivity of the
model was lowered relative  to the target
baseline value under the  final  set of
test conditions.  For this  reason it was
not  possible to identify  a  specific
threshold value of surcharge  pressure
necessary to heal the two slot windows.
     The success of this  window closing
test has important  ramifications for real
                -8
               10 ~
                 -7
                10 -
                          Baseline Curve
                                                             TEST 3(a)
                                                 window Cloilng Curve
      Overburden / Hydraulic
                                              j   Initial :  1.0/1.0 pal

                                              p      :  1.5/2.0 pal
                                              I
                                              i   Final :  2.0/3.0 pal
                io-8-
                                             Window Closing Test Initiated
                                               I
                                     800       1200      1800

                                          TIME (HOURS)
                                                                         2400
                       Figure 7.  Baseline and window  closing hydraulic
                                  conductivity test  results.
                                             -87-

-------
 slurry walls.  It means that the effective
 overburden pressure in the wall  may serve
 to close residual slurry windows and may
 even close a multitude of micro  shrinkage
 cracks that may develop in the backfill
 over the life of the barrier due to the
 effects of chemical  leachates.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

      The  research described  herein  was  sup-
ported wholly  by the  Land  Pollution Control
Division  of the U.S.  EPA Hazardous  Waste
Engineering Research  Laboratory  under
contract  #68-03-3210  to the  Department  of
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Uni-
versity of Cincinnati.  Appreciation is
expressed to project  officer Joseph  K.
Burkart and Work Assignment  Manager Naomi
P. Barkley for their  administrative and
technical support.  The authors  also wish
to acknowledge and thank graduate student
Jong  Jen  (Steve) Lin  for his enthusiastic
dedication to the work and Frank E.
Weisgerber for his technical contributions.
Finally, we gratefully acknowledge base
operations manager Gerard Roberto for
his considerable efforts on behalf of
this  project and others at the Center
Hill Solid and Hazardous Waste Research
Facility.

REFERENCE/SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.  Evans, J.C.,  6.P.  Lennon and K.A.
    Witmer.   Analysis  of Soil Bentonjte
    Backfill  Placement in Slurry Walls,
    in:   Proceedings of the Sixth Annual
    National  Conference on  Management of
    Uncontrolled  Hazardous  Waste Sites,
    November  4-6,  1985, Washington,  D.C.,
    pp.  357-361.
 Ayers, J.E., D.C. Lager and M.J.
 Barvenik.  The First EPA Superfund
 Cut-off Wall:  Design and Specifica-
 tions.  Presented at the Third National
 Symposium on Aquifer Restoration and
 Groundwater Monitoring, 1983.

 Barvenik, M.J., W.E. Hadge, and D.T.
 Go!berg.  Quality Control  of Hydraulic
 Conductivity and Bentonite Content
 During Soil/Bentonite Cutoff Wall
 Construction, in:Land Disposal  of
 Hazardous Waste.  Proceedings of the
 Eleventh Annual  Research Symposium,
 Cincinnati, Ohio,  April  1984.
 EPA/600/9-85/013,  pp.  66-79.

 D'Appolonia,  D.J.   Slurry  Trench Cut-
 off  Walls for Hazardous  Waste Isolation.
 Technical  Paper.Engineered  Construc-
 tion International,  Inc.,  Pittsburgh,
 Pennsylvania,  April  1980.

 Evans,  J.C.,  H.Y.  Fang  and I.J.
 Kugelman.   Containment  of  Hazardous
 Materials  with Soil-Bentonite Slurry
 Walls,  in":  Proceedings  of the Sixth
 National  Conference  on  the Management
 of Uncontrolled  Hazardous  Waste Sites,
 November 4-5,  1985;  Washington, D.C.,
 pj>.  369-373.

 Evans,  J.C., H.Y.  Fang.  Geotechnical
 Aspects  of  the Design and  Construction
 of Waste Containment Systems.  Proceed-
 ings of the National Conference on the
 Management  of Uncontrolled  Hazardous
 Waste Sites, November 1982.
JRB Associates.  Slurr.
for Polution Control
Trench Construction
-y Tr
 EPA-
  •540/2-84-001.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Municipal Environmental Research Labora-
tory, Cincinnati, Ohio, February 1984.
                                           -88-

-------
            EXPERT SYSTEMS TO ASSIST IN DECISIONS CONCERNING LAND DISPOSAL OF
                                     HAZARDOUS WASTES

                                   Daniel  G. Greathouse
                      United States Environmental Protection Agency
                                     Cincinnati,  Ohio
                                         ABSTRACT

     In FY'84 the Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory successfully
developed a small proof-of-concept expert system to assist in interpretation of
chemical  immersion test (EPA Method 9090) data for PVC liner materials.   This was the
beginning of an orderly progression of efforts to assess the feasibility of using expert
systems to assist in permit reviews for hazardous waste land disposal  sites.  Permit
review decision areas amenable to expert system applications have been identified and
several systems are in various stages of development and testing.  The rationale for this
approach to provide decision support aids for permit review include the  complexity of the
required engineering evaluations; availability of extensive relevant research results and
known subject-specific specialists (experts); concern that permit reviewers do not have
all of the required expertise and that they have little, if any access to subject specific
specialists; concern that the reviewers do not have sufficient time to assimilate all
regulatory policy and research information; and concern that decisions may not be
consistent among reviewers or with EPA regulations and policies.  The decision areas
selected for expert system development and the progress on the ongoing development efforts
will be presented.
INTRODUCTION

     Review of permits for land disposal
of hazardous wastes requires numerous
decisions concerning technical and policy
issues.  Some require interpretation and
application of information in research
reports, others involve interpretation and
evaluation of specialized test data, and
others involve assessment of compliance
with latest regulatory policies.  Special-
ized knowledge concerning a number of
technical areas and a broad base of
environmental regulatory experience are
necessary to adequately perform these
reviews.  This need for current knowledge
and background in addition to the concern
that reviews be consistent (i.e., permits
are judged the same by all reviewers)
prompted our interest in expert systems.

     Expert systems are computer programs
(software) designed to provide advice
concerning specialized areas.  The design
objective of the programs is  to emulate
the advice of subject specialists by
incorporating the decision rules or
criteria that they use in terms of IF —-
THEN statements.  For example, IF the
carbon black content of an HOPE liner is
less than 2 percent THEN the liner is
inappropriate.  Two characteristics of
these programs differentiate them from
traditional programs, namely (1) they are
essentially large pattern matching rou-
tines that seek a solution (advice) that
corresponds to the pattern of input data
and (2) the program logic is separated
from the rules (IF -— THEN statements) to
facilitate ease of rule modification or
refinement.  Like traditional programs
these systems can perform engineering and
statistical calculations, but these are
not the primary feature of these systems.

     This paper presents the history,
current status, and future direction of
the expert systems development program
supported by the Land Pollution Control
Division of the Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory.  The development
methods being used and some of our
experiences are also presented.
                                           -89-

-------
 HISTORY  OF EXPERT SYSTEMS  DEVELOPMENTS

      In  1984 a  small  proof-of-concept
 expert system was developed  to  assist in
 assessment of chemical compatibility of
 PVC  liner  materials based  on chemical
 Immersion  test  (EPA Method 9090) data.
 This system demonstrated that at least
 for  this specific application it is
 feasible to extract sufficient  information
 from an  expert  to formulate  advisory
 rules for  some  decisions that must be made
 by permit  reviewers.  This system contained
 20 rules and was  written in  BASIC for the
 IBM  PC microcomputer.  To  determine what
 other permit review decision areas would
 be amenable to  expert system applications,
 a Requirements  Study was initiated.
 Other issues addressed were  development
 strategy,  software and hardware require-
 ments, and  associated resource requirements.
 Table 1  presents  the prioritized list of
 decision areas  identified  by this project,
 which was  completed in the fall of 1985.
 In order to facilitate compatibility among
 the  systems designed to provide assistance
 1n the different  decision  areas, and to
 facilitate  information sharing among
 them, it was recommended that a supervisory
 system with decision-specific submodules be
 developed  to address permit  review.  It
 was  also recommended that  development be
 performed on AI dedicated  hardware with
 specialized software due to  the limitations
 of the PC-based expert systems software
 at the time.  The  former recommendation
 was  rejected due to the concern that the
 deadlines  for performing most permit
 reviews would be past before a comprehensive
 permit review system could be built, hence-
 the  strategy of developing independent
 modules to  address individual, narrowly
 defined decision areas.   The latter
 recommendation was rejected  due to the
 concern over potential high  equipment
 costs (for  development and possibly for
 running the systems) and the uncertainty
 that  it would be feasible to develop
 software on the specialized  hardware for
 use  on the available micro-computers.   Our
objective was to make the systems available
 for use by everyone in the EPA or the
states responsible for permit review.   Due
to these concerns and the rapidly advancing
capabilities of micro-computer based
expert systems languages and shells the
 decision was made to develop the systems
on the PC for use on the EPA standard  IBM
 PC/AT microcomputers.   Also the goal  of
wide distribution of the systems has been an
 important  factor  in  selection  of  particular
 microcomputer "software.   Strong preference
 for minimal  licensing  costs  for run time
 versions in  addition to  flexibility for
 tailoring  to particular  applications,
 have been  the  driving  considerations for
 software selection.  The recommendations
 of  the  Requirements  Study concerning
 decision areas  provided  direction  for
 initial development  efforts  and raised
 the issues of  development strategy and
 software/hardware selection  for consider-
 ation and  resolution.

      The initial proof-of-concept  PVC
 liner resistance system  was  redone by an
 EPA contractor.   It  was  expanded to
 include advisory rules for HOPE and CSPE
 liner materials and  refined  by incorpo-
 rating the advice of additional experts.
 This system  is  ready for limited use by
 permit reviewers.  A Waste Analysis
 advisory system has  also  been developed
 and is ready for limited  use.  Current
 development  efforts  include  systems to
 assist in  evaluation of  Closure Plans,
 Surface Impoundments,  and Site Selection
 and to assist in screening of control
 technologies for CERCLA  sites.  Each of
 these systems is described in further
 detail later in this paper.

 SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS

     The FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE LINER RESISTANCE
 system includes rules  to  assist in inter-
 pretation and evaluation  of  chemical
 immersion  (EPA Method  9090)  data for PVC,
 HOPE, and CSPE liner materials.  The
 primary input data for the system are
 physical property measurements obtained
 during a four-month time  period; the 9090
 test requires immersion of coupons of the
 liner material  in the waste  to be disposed.
 Information  is also  included concerning
 the  carbon black content  (for .HOPE mate-
 rials), intended service  life, etc.
 Based on this input the system determines
 if  there is evidence that the proposed
 liner material  may not be resistant to
 the wastes that will  be deposited at the
 site.  An example of input data is pre-
 sented in Table 2 and the resulting
 conclusions are shown in Table 3.   The
 data are entered on Lotus 1-2-3 type
 screens and can be edited, saved,  plotted,
 and/printed out on the screen or hard
 copy.  This is  different from the  typical
 interactive,  or question-driven, input of
many expert systems.   Advice  corresponding
                                          -90-

-------
to. any set of input data is derived by
transferring the data and some simple
statistics (means, percent changes, etc.)
to an'expert system.written in Arity
Prolog.  Conclusions that a liner material
is not chemically resistant to the subject
waste/1eachate are presented separately
for each physical property examined.
Nothing is stated concerning those proper-
ties that do not indicate a failure to be
resistant.  For example, in the sample
data in Table 2, since weight does not
change over time, nothing is said concern-
ing weight change in the conlusions in
Table 3.  Excessive scatter in the data,
which makes trend analysis uncertain, is
also noted as illustrated by tensile
strength.  All of the systems have been
developed for application on an IBM PC/AT
microcomputer.  This system is currently
being reviewed by the Office of Solid
Wastes in preparation for release and
introduction to the EPA Regional Offices
and the States in performing permit
reviews of land disposal facilities.

     This system was developed by an.EFA
contractor and is an expansion and refine-
ment of the original prototype system
developed by the Laboratory.  Since the
expert used as the resource for the initial
system is a well known recognized expert
in the field of flexible membrane testing,
he was also used as one of the subject
specialists (experts) and consultant for
this phase of the development effort.  The
fact that he gave different responses to
questions by the contractor personnel
than to the same questions by the EPA
person, and did not recall the advice «
recorded by the EPA person, illustrates
the  importance .and difficulty of acquiring
expert opinions.  This problem has been
alleviated in this  follow-up system by
acquiring the input of multiple experts •
and  by comparisons of their advice with,
that of the finalized system on sample
test data.  Further testing of the rule
bases and software  is also being performed
by the Office of Solid Waste to insure
compliance with regulatory policies and
guidance documents, to identify any errors
in the software, and insure that the
users' manual i.s correct and adequate.
Thorough, documentation, including identi-
fication of the source for each rule
in the rule base, is a requirement for all
of the systems.
     The, WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN EVALUATION
SYSTEM assists in the identification of
chemical  incompatibilities,that may occur
when different waste chemicals are handled4
stored, treated, or buried together. ,It
also recommends the appropriate sampling
equipment and analytical  methods for
monitoring the waste stream.  The knowledge
base (rules and information) for this
system was developed by the expert who
prepared the manual entitled "Waste
Analysis Plans: A Guidance Manual" for
the Office of Solid Waste.  Other resource
materials included regulations in 10 CFR
Part ,21 "Identification and Listing of
Hazardous Wastes" and 40 CFR 264 Waste
Management Facility Regulations; and
guidance from regulatory personnel in the
Office of Solid Waste and permit reviewers
from two EPA Regional Offices.  This
system was also developed in Arity Prolog
for.application on the IBM PC AT micro-
computer.  It has been tested in two of
the EPA Regional Offices and one state.

    .The waste analysis evaluation system
will be finalized by the EPA contractor
by  early spring of 1987 and submitted to
the Office of Solid Waste for Review and
testing.  This system is effectively an
intelligent data base system that facili-
tates implementation of the evaluation
procedures specified in the Waste Analysis
Plan Evaluation Document prepared by OSW..
As  such it helps to illustrate one of the
uses of expert systems methods.  One of
the primary features of the system is the
identification of chemical incompatibilities
among the waste compounds.  Typically
this would be done by a professional
chemist and/or by consulting available
tables.  Many of the permit reviewers are
not chemists, however, and looking up
every pair of chemicals in an appropriate
table is time-consuming.  The waste
analysis system reduces the time for this
determination, which is another reasonable
purpose of expert systems.

     The SUBSIDENCE EVALUATION SYSTEM was
developed to identify waste characteristics,
disposal procedures, climatic conditions,
etc. that increase the risk of differential
subsidence of a landfill after closure.
This system incorporates the observations
and insights of coprincipal investigators
on  an EPA-supported project to identify
and evaluate the causes of, post-closure
                                          -91-

-------
 differential  subsidence.   As are the
 earlier described systems, this  one is
 also written  in Arity Prolog for applica-
 tion on the IBM PC/AT microcomputers.
 The rules  for this system are ready for
 inclusion  as  part of a system to evaluate
 the adequacy  of proposed  cover systems.

      The subsidence system was a learning
 experience by the EPA staff to assess  the
 feasiblity of summarizing the results  of
 a  recently completed research project  in
 terms of an expert system.   As a result
 of this effort, one can learn to understand
 the factors that contribute to post-closure
 differential  subsidence by either reading
 the final  project report  or using the
 parallel expert system.   This further
 illustrates potential  applications  for
 expert systems  techniques.   A diskette
 could be provided with each major research
 report or  as  a  stand-alone  product.  The
 expert system would facilitate use  of  the
 basic material  and the final  report would
 provide further discussion  and/or resource
 materials.

      The CONTROL TECHNOLOGY SCREENING
 SYSTEM was  designed  to assist in  screening
 of technologies  to  contain  or remove
 hazardous wastes  from  CERCLA (Superfund)
 sites.   The technologies  included  in the
 system database  are  arranged  in  a  four-
 level  hierarchy.   These levels consist  of
 1)  generic  action (containment or removal),
 2)  action class  (e.g., capping,  subsurface
 barriers, etc.),  3)  technology class (e.g.,
 single layer  caps,  horizontal  barriers,
 vertical barriers, etc.), and  4)  distinct
 technologies  (e.g.,  soil  liner cap,
 synthetic liner cap, slurry wall, etc.).
 The rules for this system were developed
 from  information  contained in  available
 reports  and documents  published and/or
 supported by the  EPA (see Table 3).  The
 system  is not complete and ready to use
 since  it contains a  number of information
 gaps  and needs refinement.   It is an
 excellent prototype  system that demon-
 strates the potential for this type of
 application.  It  has also  been written
 in Arity Prolog for  application on the PC
AT microcomputer.

     The technology screening system is
being directed towards the need of the
 EPA Site Coordinators responsible for
initial feasibility investigations of
Superfund sites.  In addition to  its basic
 screening  role,  it has  features  that
 could  be used'as  a training  tool  and
 information  resource.   Thorough  Help
 screens  are  included to  define and  explain
 terms  and  selection criteria, and the
 rules  for  assessing suitability  of  a
 particular technology are  presented in
 self-explanatory  terms.  The input  data
 for each run  can  be saved  and selectively
 modified as  part  of a sensitivity analysis.
 This system,  which is based on the  infor-
 mation abstracted from mutiple resource
 materials, illustrates  the feasibility of
 using  expert  systems concepts to integrate
 information  from  multiple  sources into a
 unified  information resource.

     The SURFACE  IMPOUNDMENT SAFETY
 ANALYSIS SYSTEM is  being designed to
 provide  user-friendly access to  available
 analytical routines for  estimating safety
 of  selected components of surface impound-
 ments.   The system  will  also assist in
 interpretation of the safety factors that
 results  from  the  calculations.   The
 development language or  expert system
 shell has not yet  been decided but it
 will likely be written in  Insight 2 (a PC
 expert system shell) with the analytical
 routines written  as Fortran subroutines
 that are accessed thru links written in
 C.   The  delivery  system will  be written
 for  application on the IBM PC AT micro-
 computer.  Scheduled completion is late
 summer or fall of  1987.

     The CLOSURE  PLAN EVALUATION SYSTEM
 is being developed to assist  in review of
 closure  plans (for land disposal  sites
 that will close due to failure to apply
 for a part B  permit or failure to receive
 approval  of their part B permit)  and
 permits for closure (for land disposal
sites that submit a part B and receive
approval).   The initial  system will  not
 be applicable to "clean" closures for
surface impoundments.   The system has
 been divided  into the following  6
components:

 1.  Cover systems
2.  Runon/runoff control
3.  Final vegetative cover
4.  Ground-water monitoring program
5.  Leachate  collection  and treatment
    systems
6.  Scheduled maintenance and  monitoring
    of  al1  systems
                                          -92-

-------
Development is being phased and staggered.
Initial  efforts will be devoted to initia-
tion and development of one system.
Midway through the time for completion of
the first project, the second one will be
initiated.  When the first system is
finalized the third one will be initiated
while efforts on the second continue.  It
is anticipated that the first system will
be completed by the first of August of
1987 with each successive system due for
completion 2 months after completion of
the former, i.e., the second is scheduled
for completion by the first of October,
1987, the third by the first of December,
1987, etc.  The total time for the 6
modules is scheduled at 14 months.  The
delivery machine will be the IBM'PC/AT
microcomputer with minimal required
enhancements such as a graphics card.
The decision concerning software has not
yet been made.

DISCUSSION                             " .   ,

     All of the expert systems supported
by the Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory address issues related to
containment of hazardous wastes in a land
disposal site or removal to another site.
The decisions addressed by each are
sufficiently limited in scope that the
systems are small enough for implemen-
tation on the standard IBM PC/AT micro-
computer.  The primary focus of the
systems are technical issues that have
been researched by the Laboratory during
the past years.  Hence EPA-sponsored
research reports have been a major source
of information for knowledge-base formation
for a number of the systems.  That is one
reason we believe that expert systems (or
knowledge-based systems) can play a
significant role in terms of automated
technology transfer systems for the
Laboratory.

     Based on our experience, prototype
systems can be developed to address
relevant questions without a major commit-
ment of resources and time.  Some of the
smaller inhouse systems were developed
within 2 or 3 months by one person assisted
by a microcomputer specialist.  Development
of prototype systems, however, is not the
major task.  The major effort is to
prepare a finalized system for general use
by decision officials both within and
outside the Agency.  Some of the time-
consuming and difficult tasks include
knowledge-base refinement to address latest
research1 results, policy considerations,
and user needs and desires; testing the
knowledge bases to insure they reflect the
opinions of the experts or advice contained
in the source materials; testing of the
source code to insure freedom from coding
and programming errors; documentation of
the source code and preparation of an
users' manual; maintenance and refinement
of the systems; and provision of readily
available and accessible user support.
In order to insure that the systems
satisfy the needs of the user community,
we are working interactively with the
users as the systems are initially con-
ceived, developed, and refined.  One of
the systems (Flexible Membrane Liner
Resistance) is being tested by comparing
the conclusions of the system on sample
test data with those reached by the
experts without assistance from the
system.  All rules are being documented
by source (expert or specific report
citation).  The other issues are being
discussed with representative from the
Office of Solid Waste but have not yet
been resolved.

     Based on the success of our develop-
ment efforts, responses from the user
community, and the interests expressed by
management and regulatory personnel , the
next major expansion area will be treat-
ment technologies.  This will include
screening of treatment methods or techno-
logies for the RI/FS process for Superfund
sites and/or remediation of RCRA sites,
evaluation of treatment test data (for
example trial burn data), and evaluation
of proposals for particular treatment
regimens to handle particular waste
streams.

CONCLUSIONS

     It is feasible to develop usable and
useful expert systems.  Expert systems
appear to offer significant opportunities
for insuring expedient implementation of
latest technologies, compliance with
regulatory policies, and decision consist-
encies.  Hence we expect to continue
efforts to complete systems under develop-
ment, maintain ongoing systems and develop
new ones to assist in other amenable decision
areas.
                                          -93-

-------
                                  TABLE 1

   PRIORITIZED LIST  OF  PERMIT  REVIEW DECISION  AREAS  AMENABLE  TO EXPERT
                SYSTEM  APPLICATIONS  (As Of December  1985)
Priority 1
Priority 2
Priority 3
Priority 4
Priority 5
            -  Facility Closure  Plans
            -  Facility Location  Information
            -  Synthetic Liner Design
            -  Dike Design and Construction
              Lower Soil Liner  Design
              Secondary Leachate  Collection
              Primary Leachate  Collection
              Facility Post-Closure  Plan
              Landfill Run-on Control  System  Design
              Lower Soil Liner  Construction
              Landfill Run-off  Control  System Design
              Waste Analysis Plan
              Plan for Management of  Units Associated with  Landfill  Run-
              on and Run-off Control  Plan
              Chemical and Physical Analysis of  Hazardous Waste  to  Be
              Handled
              Prevention of Overtopping
              Landfill Wind Dispersal Flow Control  Plan
              Construction Quality Assurance Plan
              Synthetic Liner Construction (upper and lower)
              Inspection Plans
              Plans for Preparedness and Prevention
              Contingency Plans
              Precautions Taken to Prevent Ignition or  Reaction of Wastes
              Planned Traffic Pattern
              Closure Cost Estimates and Financial Assurances
              Post Closure Cost Estimates and Financial Assurances
              Lists of Wastes to be Placed in each Surface
              Impoundment/Landfil1
              Certification by Qualified Engineer of Dike's Integrity
              General Facility Description
              Procedures and Equipment to Prevent or Mitigate Hazards
              Training Program
              Facility Deed Documentation
              Insurance Policies
              Coverage by State Financial Mechanisms
              Topographic Map for the Facility and Environment
                                      -94-

-------
                                 TABLE 2

   SAMPLE DATA FROM 9090 TESTING OF HOPE LINER MATERIALS IMMERSED IN A
                           HYPOTHETICAL WASTE
WEIGHT (grams)
                    Time
                  (months)
  Time
(months)
  Time
(months)
  Time
(months)
Sample Coupon
1
2
3
4
5
Average
% Change
0 1
1.83 1.83
1.87 1.87
1.85 1.86
1.85 1.86
1.87 1.88
1.86 1.86
0.19
0 2
1.87 1.87
1.87 1.87
1.87 1.88
1.84 1.84
1.87 1.88
1.86 1.87
0.28
0 3
1.85 1.86
1.85 1.86
1.86 1.87
1.87 1.87
1.87 1.87
1.86 1.86
0.41
0 4
1.84 1.85
1.83 1.84
1.87 1.87
1.87 1.87
1.86 1.87
1.85 1.86
0.25
TENSILE AT BREAK (Ib/in)
                              Time (months)
Sample Coupon
1
2
3
4
5
Average
% Change
0
3800
3800
3800
3800
3800
3800
0.00
1
2750
3650
4490 .
4190
4020
3820
0.53
2
2450
2520
3810
2570
3490
2958
-22.16
3
2470
2640
2570
2670
2870
2644
-30.42
4
3740
3720
2470
4560
3550
3610
-5.00 :
MODULUS (Ib/in)
                              Time (months)
Sample Coupon
1
2
3
4
5
Average
% Change
0
82900
84100
83000
84900
85200
84020
0.00
1
96000
95500
93000
93800
94500
94560
12.54
2
87500
86200
87500
89000
85500
87140
3.71
3
71500
72000
79500
74200
76500
74740
-11.04
4
60400
64200
61300
62300
61800
62000
-26.21
                                      -95-

-------
                                        TABLE 3

          CONCLUSIONS OF FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE LINER EXPERT SYSTEM FOR SAMPLE
                                  PRESENTED IN TABLE 2
DATA
The liner is fundamentally inappropriate for the application.

The liner is fundamentally inappropriate for the proposed application because either
initially or at some point in the immersion test one or more of the liner's key
physical properties was below the minimum standards established by the National
Sanitation Foundation (NSF).  NSF Standard Number 54 was developed in consultation  with
several liner industry experts.  Standard Number 54 specifies minimum values for several
physical properties for HOPE liners of two thicknesses 0.08 and 0.1 inches  (i.e., 80 and
100 mils).  There is no NSF standard for HOPE liners of less than 80 mils.

The NSF standard requires modulus of elasticity be more than 80,000 Ibs/sq  in.   For
this applicant the modulus of elasticity is 62,000.

The immersion test results indicate that the liner is not chemically resistant  to the
waste/1eachate.

The immersion test results indicate that the liner material  is excessively  softened by
the waste/1eachate.  Excessive softening is a sign of poor chemical  resistance.   A
liner material that softens excessively may not be able to withstand the stresses of
the waste site and may fail due to tearing or puncture.

Excessive softening of the liner material is evidenced by an excessive loss in  its
modulus of elasticity.  At a lower modulus a given force will produce a greater elonga-
tion of the material.  Excessive losses in modulus suggest the potential  for easier
tear, puncture, and break of the liner.

The loss in molulus of elasticity was -25.21%.  This is beyond the threshold limit  of
25% used by many liner material specialists.

No conclusion can be made as to the chemical resistance of the liner material to the
waste/1eachate.

The results are inconclusive because there is excessive scatter (i.e., lack of  preci-
sion) in the immersion test results.

The average standard deviation of the data for the four-month immersion is  greater  than
102 for the measurements of changes in:

The tensile strength at break of the liner material.
                                          -96-

-------
                       MODELING SOIL WATER MOVEMENT IN MINIMUM TECHNOLOGY
                                      WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
                                   David H. Gancarz1 and Timothy J. Durbin2

                                             1 Radian Corporation
                                              Austin, TX 78766

                                     2S.S. Papadopulos and Associates, Inc.
                                               Davis, CA 95616
                                                 ABSTRACT

    The hydrology of landfills, surface impoundments, and waste piles is dominated by unsaturated flow of soil water.
Unsaturated conditions normally persist in the cover, solid waste, liner system, leachate collection and removal system,
and in the soil below these systems. A finite element model, UNSAT2D, developed as a generalized computer program
based on the two-dimensional equation of saturated/unsaturated flow, is described. This model can be used to simulate
moisture movement through a two-dimensional vertical section of a facility.

    Results from a series of simulations of alternative "minimum technology" designs are discussed, with emphasis on
bottom liner design and leak detection. These data show that leak rates into leachate collection and removal (LCR)
systems in excess of 100 gallons/acre-day are necessary for LCR system drains to flow when constructed over three-foot
thick compacted soil bottom liners with a hydraulic conductivity of 10-7 cm/s. LCR systems built in conjunction with com-
posite (flexible membrane over low-permeability soil) bottom liners are significantly more effective. Time to drain flow is
reduced, minimum leak rate resulting in LCR system drain flow is reduced, and leachate collection efficiency increases.
INTRODUCTION

    The Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
require that certain landfills and surface impoundments
have two or more liners designed to contain hazardous
constituents, and a leachate collection system designed to
promptly detect any leaks, should they occur. Similar rules
apply to waste piles.

    These requirements constitute the "minimum tech-
nology" for waste management facilities constructed to
treat,  store, or dispose of hazardous waste. To predict the
effectiveness of different leachate collection and liner
system designs, it is necessary to have a prior understan-
ding of saturated and unsaturated moisture movement
within such systems. A useful approach to gaining insight
into the hydraulic behavior of these systems is to apply
computer simulation techniques. In this way a broad spec-
trum of design, siting, operational, and failure scenarios
may be modeled and the results used to evaluate signifi-
cant factors that influence leachate collection and liner
system performance.
    This paper describes the computer program
UNSAT2D that was developed to model saturated and un-
saturated flow in landfills, surface impoundments, and
waste piles. Following the description, results from a
number of computer simulations are discussed in terms of
leachate collection and liner system performance.

MODEL DESCRIPTION

    Soil moisture  movement within a facility is described
by the two-dimensional equation of saturated/unsaturated
soil moisture flow within a specified flow domain. A
generalized representation of the flow domain Q is shown
in Figure 1. That domain is defined by the union of boun-
dary surfaces S.| and S2, On the boundary surface S^
head is specified.  On the boundary surface S2, flux is
specified. The specified head and specified flux are each
functions of location and time.
                                                     -97-

-------
r

                                           X-Axis

                     Figure 1. Diagram representative of the flow domain.
                      The initial and boundary value problem associated
                  with this two-dimensional flow domain is described by the
                  following set of equations, written in repeating index
                  notation:
dp
                                                             ft
                     for i « x,y


                      h(x,,t) -  hB(X|,t)  on S,
                  and
                                               on
                                                                      (1)
                     (2)
                                                                      (3)
                                                                             Where h is hydraulic head, hB is hydraulic head on the
                                                                             specified head boundary, Ky is the hydraulic conductivity
                                                                             tensor, nj is the outward normal vector on the specified
                                                                             flux boundary, Ss is specific storage, qB is the flux across
                                                                             the specified flux boundary into the flow domain, N is a
                                                                             source or sink, X| are coordinates x and y,  t is time, 6 is
                                                                             soil  moisture content, p is soil moisture potential, and
                                                                             d9/dp is the soil moisture capacity. Additionally, total head
                                                                             and soil moisture potential are related by the expression:
                                                                               p(x,y,t) = h(x,y,t) - y
                                                                               (4)
    Equation 1 describes the conservation of mass at a
point. To solve the partial differential equation, additional
specification of the problem is needed. In particular, the
solution depends on the solution domain, soil character-
istics, boundary conditions, and initial conditions. The
solution domain consists of the flow and time domains.
The flow domain is the region O to be  modeled that is sur-
rounded by the boundary S. The time domain is the period
over which a solution is to be obtained. Soil characteristics
are the hydraulic properties of the soils, waste, and mem-
branes. Boundary conditions are a mathematical state-
ment of soil moisture conditions at the boundary of the
flow domain. Initial conditions are the specification of
pressures at the start of the time domain.

    Equation 1 is nonlinear because the hydraulic con-
ductivity (K) and soil moisture content (9) depend on the
soil moisture potential (p). For a particular soil, the K-6-p
relationship defines a pair of characteristic curves. Figure
2 shows two such pairs of characteristic curves.  If the ef-
fects of hysteresis are neglected, hydraulic conductivity is
a monotonic function of soil moisture potential. For all non-
negative soil moisture potentials, hydraulic conductivity is
                            10 V
                         0.
                             iov
                               0.0    0.1     0.2    0.3    0.4    0.5
                                              6  (v/v)
    10 ~11    10""    10 ~7     10
                   K  (cm/s)
                                                                     10
                  Figure 2. Volumetric moisture content (a) and hydraulic conductivity (b) versus soil moisture potential for soils used in
                           the simulations. For sand, a  = 0.3658 ft ~1 and n = 3.00. For clay, a = 0.0616 ft~1 and n = 1.59
                           (Equations 5 and 6).
                                                                         -98-

-------
the saturated hydraulic conductivity..For negative poten-
tials (positive soil moisture tensions),  however, the
hydraulic, conductivity decreases with decreasing soil
moisture potential. Likewise, the soil moisture content has
a similar functional relationship to soil moisture potential..
The soil moisture capacity, however, has a different func-
tional relationship. Soil moisture capacity is zero near.
saturation, it is zero for large soil moisture tensions, and it
has positive values between those points.

    The van Genuchten equations (2) were selected to
describe parametrically the unsaturated hydraulic proper-
ties of soils. These equations are:
        = 6r
                [.1  + (a\p\nm
   K(p) = KsHl/2[1-(1-H1/m)m]2
  -- -  (0, - 6r) a"mn(1
  (5)


,  (6)


  (7)


  (8)
and
   H  =
        6  -
       ,es -  er
                                                    (9)
where 8S is the saturated soil moisture content, 8r is the
residual soil moisture content, Ks is the saturated hy-
draulic cpnductivity, a and n are parameters that
characterize the soil, and H represents the dimensionless
soil moisture content.

    The van Genuchten equations have a number of
desirable attributes. First, the equations describe
characteristic curves with plausible shapes throughout the
range from zero to high moisture tensions, which include a
zero value of soil moisture capacity at zero pressure. Se-
cond, the soil moisture content and hydraulic conductivity
relations form a consistent pair of relations, which means
that the relations as a pair are physically plausible. Third,
the relations are adapted to particular soils by fitting only
five parameter values (6S, 0r, Ks, a, and n). Two of the
parameters are empirical (a and n), but their values  can
be derived for a particular soil from data on moisture con-
tent and soil  moisture tension for the soil. Values of a and
n used in the simulations are reported in Figure 2.

    Moisture flux across a membrane is modeled as be-
ing proportional to the difference in head on either sur-
face.  The constant of proportionality is termed "leakance."
Flux is given by:
        where qT is the flux per unit length, Cj is the leakance of
        the membrane, and AhT is the head differential across the
        membrane. The leakance is the sole hydraulic  property of
        membranes, because it is assumed that they do not store
        moisture. The leakance represents the ability of the mem-
        brane to allow soil moisture  movement under a unit head
        differential across the membrane. An impermeable mem-
        brane has  a leakance value  of zero. A permeable mem-
        brane has  a non-zero leakance value.  That non-zero
        leakance can be the result of the normal installed proper-
        ties of the  membrane or the result of distributed
        perforations.

        Numerical  Solution
    Equation 1 is solved by the Galerkin finite element
method (3). The fundamental idea of the finite element
method is to replace the exact continuous solution of the
original partial differential equation by an approximate
piecewise continuous solution. The piecewise continuous
function is described by soil moisture potentials specified
at a finite number of .discrete points called nodes. Poten-
tials between these points are calculated by using inter-
polating functions defined over a finite number of subdo-
mains called elements. The interpolating functions will pro-
vide an exact representation as the element size ap-
proaches zero in the limit. For a finite number of elements
and nodes, the approximation will not exactly satisfy Equa-
tion 1, and a residual will result. The Galerkin method
forces this residual to zero, in an average sense, through
selection of coefficients for the interpolating functions.
                                                           An interpolating function of the form:
           h(x,y,t)«h(x,y,t)
                                                   (11)
         is used, where h is a series approximation to h.^ are
         linearly independent interpolating functions defined over
         the flow domain Q, H, are undetermined coefficients, and
         n is th,e number of nodal points.

            The Galerkin finite element method yields a system of
         n ordinary differential equations that can be solved for the
         n values of Hj(t). The matrix form of the system of equa-
         tions is:
    [A]{H> + [B]
                            dt
                                  +  {F} =  0
(12)
         where the typical elements of [A], [B], and {F} are:


                  '
    qT
 (10)
                                                           (13)
                                                       -99-

-------
r
                   and
                                                                     (14)
                                                                     (15)
                   The matrices [A] and [B] have the dimensions [nxn] and
                   the vector {F} has the dimensions [nx1].

                       The matrices [A] and [B] and the vector {F} are com-
                   monly referred to by names taken from structural
                  , engineering, where the finite element method was first ap-
                   plied. The matrix [A] is referred to as the stiffness matrix,
                   because in structural problems the matrix [A] expresses
                   the stiffness of a structure. From a similar background, the
                   matrix [B] is referred to as the mass matrix, because it ex-
                   presses the mass of a vibrating structure. Finally, the vec-
                   tor {F} is referred to as the load vector, because in struc-
                   tural problems it expresses the external forces on a
                   structure.

                       To facilitate the integrations in equations 13 -15, the
                   interpolating functions are defined piecewise in each ele-
                   ment and their union produces global interpolating func-
                   tions within the flow domain.  The elemental interpolating
                   functions are linear and are defined over two-dimensional
                   triangular elements within zones occupied by soils or
                   waste and over one-dimensional linear elements where
                   membranes occur. Triangular elements, which are used to
                   represent soils and soil-like porous media, have three
                   nodes (Rgure 3), and yield [3x3] elemental matrices.
                   Linear elements, which  are used to represent membranes,
                   have four nodes (Figure 4), and yield [4x4] matrices.
                          «
                         3
                                              Node-
                                           X-Axis


                           Figure 3. Triangle element representing
                                   soils and soil-like porous media.

                                                                                                       Element
                        X-Axis

    Figure 4. Linear element representing a membrane.
    Equations 13 -15 are performed on an element by
element basis, but the results of those integrations are
assembled into global matrices. Elemental stiffness and
mass matrices are generated, and the results are then
transferred to the global stiffness and mass matrices. The
global matrices are obtained by summing, for a given
node, the contribution to that node from each elemental
matrix. This procedure is described  by Wang and Ander-
son (3) for each node in an element and for all elements in
the domain Q.

    Equation 12  is discretized in time by an implicit finite
difference representation of the time derivative, which
leads to a system of algebraic equations for the n coeffi-
cients Hj(t) at time t. However, the coefficients of the
matrices [A] and  [B] depend in part on hydraulic head,
and the system of algebraic equations is nonlinear
because of the dependence of hydraulic conductivity and
soil moisture on head. Fortunately, the nonlinearity in-
troduced by the soil characteristics is not too severe, and
a solution  of Equation 12 can be obtained by a simple
iterative procedure. The iterative procedure is a two step
predictor-corrector scheme. In the first iteration, heads at
the one-half time step are predicted  using soil properties
based on heads at the beginning of the time step. Using
heads at the one-half time step, soil  properties are
reevaluated. Then, using these corrected soil properties,
heads at the end of the time step are computed.

    The mathematical basis described above has been in-
corporated into the computer program UNSAT2D. The pro-
gram  includes components for data input and for the
march of the numerical solution through time. The data in-
put component reads information on the problem
geometry,  material hydraulic properties, initial conditions,
and boundary conditions.  The time march component in-
cludes an outer time step  loop and an inner predictor-
corrector loop. The time step loop is repeated for the
specified number of time steps in the simulation, and the
                                                                       -100-

-------
predictor-corrector loop is repeated twice for each time
step.

APPLICATION

    To investigate moisture movement at facilities equip-
ped with leachate collection and removal (LCR) and liner
systems, a series of computer simulations have been per-
formed.

    The focus of analysis in this study is the performance
of the LCR and liner systems. Insofar as the function of
these systems is to contain hazardous constituents and
promptly detect any leaks that should occur, measures of
performance include:

• the minimum top liner leak rate that will cause LCR
  system drains to flow;

• the time required for a given leak to cause drain flow;

• the pattern of drain flow a given leak evokes;

• the leachate collection efficiency expressed as the ratio
  of LCR system drain flow to top liner flux; and

• the total volume of moisture lost from the facility to the
  surrounding environment.

    The simulated facility is a double-lined surface im-
poundment with  various degrees of top liner failure and
different bottom liner designs. The physical system, il-
lustrated in Figure 5, consists of a 300-foot wide by 10-foot
deep surface impoundment with 4:1 sideslopes and 2 per-
cent lower slopes.

     In the series of simulations discussed in this paper,
the LCR system consists of a one-foot thick layer of sand
(saturated hydraulic conductivity of 10'3 cm/s) and a
system of five drains resting on the bottom liner. Figure 2
describes the hydraulic properties of the sand. The
drainage layer is bounded above-by a flexible membrane
liner (FML), which constitutes the top liner. A two-foot thick
sludge layer blankets the top liner and is assigned a
saturated hydraulic conductivity of 10~4 cm/s.

    Two types of bottom liners have been simulated. Com-
posite bottom liners consist of an upper FML component
underlain by a low-permeability compacted soil compo-
nent. Non-composite bottom liners lack the upper FML
component. The compacted soil layer in the model has a
clay texture with a saturated hydraulic conductivity of 10'7
cm/s. Hydraulic properties of the clay are described by
Figure 2. A static water table exists at a depth of 20 feet,
and the surrounding loam-textured soil has a saturated
hydraulic conductivity of 10'4 cm/s.

    The sand drainage layer is assigned an initial soil
moisture tension of 0.1 bar (24 percent moisture v/v), and
the compacted soil layer is assigned an initial soil
moisture tension of 0.33 bar (27 percent moisture v/v). In-
itial moisture tension in native soil and sludge is
hydrostatic with respect to the water table and impounded
liquid surface, respectively. Before leakage into the LCR
system occurs, the facility is allowed to equilibrate for ap-
proximately three years. At the end of this period, leakage
across the top liner begins.

    The model is bounded by the sludge layer at the top,
a ten-foot native soil fringe to the sides, and by three feet
of soil below. Boundary conditions are prescribed poten-
tial. The boundary condition on the top sludge surface is
calculated as the pressure potential with respect to the
surface of the impounded liquid. Boundary conditions at
the bottom and sides are calculated as the pressure
potential with respect to the water table. Because the
facility is symmetrical about a vertical centerline, only half
the problem is modeled.
              Oj

       "$  --s
        d)     *J
       H—

       T~10
       I  -15
       1-20
               -150  -120   -90    -60   -30     0      30      60      90     120    150
                                      Horizontal   Distance  (feet)
                       Figure 5. Schematic of the surface impoundment used in the simulations.
                                                    -101-

-------
Non-composite Bottom Liners

     In a set of three simulations, moisture passes into the
drainage layer across a uniformly leaky top liner at rates of
14 gallons/acre-day, 95 gallons/acre-day, and 795
gallons/acre-day. These non-composite (NC) bottom liner
simulations are identified as NC-14, NC-95, and NC-795,
respectively. In each case, the bottom liner is a three-foot
thick layer of compacted clay-textured soil.  Figure 6 shows
the soil moisture potentials that surround each of the
drains as functions of time. Negative potentials exist in un-
saturated soils and potentials rise towards zero as soils
approach saturation. At nonnegative potentials, soils are
saturated and  drain flow occurs. Summarized results from
these simulations are  reported in Table 1.

    The simulation data suggest that a top liner flux in ex-
cess of 95 gallons/acre-day is necessary to achieve
saturation and drainage in the LCR system. In  simulation
NC-95, soil moisture potential at the drains increases over
time but stabilizes after six to eight years (Figure 6). Soil
moisture potential at the centerline drain (Drain 1) reaches
-9 cm at steady state. Drains 2 and 3 do not approach zero
potential as closely because their vertical position realtive
to Drain 1  causes the equilibrium soil moisture potential
around them to be more negative because of their position
with respect to the water table. A top liner flux of 95
gallons/acre-day causes soil potentials around  drains to
approach closely to zero which suggests that this flux is
near the threshold leak rate required to cause drain flow in
a facility of this design.

    In simulation NC-795, drains begin to flow 3.1 months
after the top liner leak begins. When steady state condi-
tions are realized after roughly five months, flux across the
                                         -50
                                        -100
                                        -150
                                        -200
                                        -250
                                               NC-14
                                      E
                                      o
                                         -50
                                                                :p -100
                                                                 c
                                                                -2 -150
                                                                 o

                                                                   -200

                                                                3-250
                                                                 OT

                                                                1    -

                                                                'I  -50
                                                                t/)
                                                                   -100

                                                                   -150

                                                                   -200
                                                                          NC-95
                                                                    Drain  1
                                                           — — — Drain  2
                                                           	Drain  3
                                               NC-795
                                                  234
                                                    Time
                                                                                       567
                                                                                      (years)
                                                                      8   9  10
                              Figure 6. Soil moisture potentials at LCR system drains for
                                       non-composite bottom liner simulations.
                           TABLE 1. LCR/LINER SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
       Simulation
NC-14      NC-95     NC-795   NC-795-6   NC-64-6   NC-76-6    C-777     C-60
                            14
            95
                                                 795
                                  795
                                                                        64
                                                        76
                                                                                            777
                                                                            60
Top Liner Rux
  (gallons/acre-day)

Tbp Liner Leak Location    Uniform    Uniform    Uniform    Uniform    Uniform    Uniform    Uniform  Sidewall
Bottom Liner Thickness       3          3          3          6          6         6          33
  (feet)
Time to Drain Flow
  (months)
Steady State Flux into
Bottom Liner
  (gallons/acre-day)
Steady State Leachate
Collection Efficiency

Cumulative Loss from Unit  213,000   1,320,000  2,530,000  2,070,000    875,000    943,000     300
after 40 years
  (gallons/acre)
                          no flow     no flow

                            14         95
                       3.1


                       174



                      0.78
 2.8


 144



0.82
no flow


  64
 71


 68



0.11
  1.0       16.5


 0.002     0.002



>0.999  > 0.999


           300
                                                    -102-

-------
bottom liner is 174 gallons/acre-day. Leachate collection
efficiency, defined as the ratio of steady state drain flux to
steady state top liner flux, is 0.78.

     In simulation NC-14, soil moisture potential at the
drains declines over time as a result of net moisture move-
ment out of the drainage layer and through the underlying
liner (Figure 6). Net drying of the sand layer occurs
because it was initially assigned a greater soil water
potential than the underlying compacted soil layer. After a
period of roughly five years, moisture conditions at the
drains stabilize in response to the combined  effects of
moisture influx from above, unsaturated hydraulic proper-
ties of the drainage laye.r, bottom liner, and native soil, and
distance to the water table beneath the facility.

     Increasing the thickness of a compacted soil bottom
liner from three to  six feet does not significantly improve
its ability to act as an impermeable barrier to moisture
movement. A fourth simulation was identical  to NC-795 ex-
cept that:the bottom  compacted soil liner was six feet thick
rather than three feet thick. Table 1 summarizes results
from this simulation, identified as NC-795-6. Increasing
liner thickness from three to six feet results in a slight
decrease in time to drain flow (3.1 to 2.8 months)  and a
slight increase in leachate collection efficiency (0.78 to
0.82).

     The minimum top liner leak rate necessary to cause
drain flow in an LCR system above a six-foot thick com-
pacted soil bottom liner was found to be between 64 and
76 gallons/acre-day. In simulation NC-76-6 (Table  1) a flux
of 76 gallons/acre-day across a uniformly leaky top liner
causes the centerline drain (Drain 1) to flow after  71
months. Soils at Drains 2 and 3 never reach saturation
and never flow. In simulation NC-64-6 (Table 1), a top liner
flux of 64 gallons/acre-day is insufficient to cause drain
flow.

Composite Bottom Liners

     When a composite bottom liner is substituted for a
non-composite bottom liner, LCR system effectiveness is
greatly improved. Time to drain flow is reduced, minimum
top liner flux that will cause drains to flow is reduced, and
leachate collection efficiency increases. This  improvement
is demonstrated by 'composite (C) bottom liner simulation
C-777, in which moisture enters the drainage layer across
a uniformly leaky top liner at 777 gallons/acre-day. The
bottom liner consists of an FML component above a three-
foot thick compacted soil component. The FML compo-
nent of the bottom  liner is allowed to pass moisture at a
rate of approximately 0.02 gallons/acre-day, which is a
typical rate for vapor phase transport across an intact FML
(1).  Tabular performance data for C-777 are reported in
Table 1, and soil moisture potentials at the drains  are
shown in Figure 7.

     In simulation C-777, a top liner flux of 777 gallons/
acre-day causes drain flow 1.0 month after leakage begins.
This delay is a consequence of the absorptive capacity of
       I-    0
       a>
      -*-*
       o
       5  -25

       E
      vH»  ~50


      ~  -75
           Drain 1
  	Drain 2
  	Drain 3
i   ii   i   i   i
      jO  1000  12345  6   7  8  9  10
                     Time  (weeks)

Figure 7. Soil moisture potentials at LCR system drains for
         simulation C-777.
the granular drainage material. Only when a sufficient
volume of moisture is added to the drainage layer will soils
around the drains become fully saturated and drain flow
begin. Since the FML component of the composite bottom
liner allows very little moisture to pass into the bottom
liner, virtually all the moisture that leaks into the drainage
layer during this period is used to satisfy this absorptive
capacity. Because the absorptive capacity of a soil is a
function of initial moisture content and moisture
characteristic curve (e.g., Figure 2a), the wetting period
may be reduced with an initially wetter drainage layer
and/or with a coarser drainage material such as coarse
sand or pea gravel, for example.

    Since a net increase in the moisture content of a
drainage layer is possible only when top liner flux exceeds
flux into the bottom liner, the bottom liner leak rate defines
the minimum detectable top liner leak rate. An LCR/liner
system using a composite bottom liner in  good condition
can be expected to have a bottom liner leak rate of less
than 1  gallon/acre-day. Constant wetting of the drainage
layer is possible for top liner fluxes greater than  this and
drain flow will eventually occur. This top liner leak rate is
much lower than the approximately 100 gallons/acre-day
required to cause drain flow in LCR systems above three-
foot thick non-composite bottom liners.

    Leachate collection  efficiency is greatly improved
when composite bottom  liners are used. A collection effi-
ciency approaching 1.0 is achieved by simulation C-777,
compared with an efficiency of 0.78 achieved by NC-795.

    The preceding simulations use uniformly leaky top
liners that allow moisture to enter the drainage layer along
its entire length. In simulation C-60, the top liner is im-
permeable except for ten-foot wide sections centered on
either sideslope through which moisture enters the
drainage layer at a rate of 60 gallons/acre-day. Otherwise,
the facility design of C-60 is identical to that of C-777.   ,
Table 1 summarizes data from this simulation. Soil
moisture potentials at the drains are presented in Figure 8.

    Simulation  C-60 illustrates the response of an LCR
system to a localized top  liner leak. As evidenced by the
change in soil moisture potential at the drains (Figure 8),
moisture that enters the drainage layer on the facility
                                                      -103-

-------
                                                         SUMMARY
      o

      E
      u
      .2  -7
      s
u
-25
-50
-75


_^Xx ^--
" ' _•'•-•*
---"" -"
,~~ •*
S X* r\rn\n 1
17""" 	 Drain 2
. / 1 1 1
] 6 12 18 2
                    Time  (months)
Figure 8. Soil moisture potentials at LCR system drains for
         simulation C-60.
sldeslope travels downslope past Drains 2 and 3 by un-
saturated flow and collects in the vicinity of Drain 1 on the
facility centerline. Drain 1 eventually flows after 16.5
months. Drains 2 and 3 never flow.

    Soil around Drain 3, at the toe of the sideslope,
begins to wet almost immediately (Figure 8) in response to
the sidewall leak approximately ten feet away. After
roughly six months, the influence of the sidewall leak
reaches Drain 2 and soil there begins to wet. In eight
months, soil around Drain 1 begins to wet and that drain
flows 16.5 months after the start of the sidewall leak.

    Since drains operated at atmospheric pressure cannot
remove unsaturated soil moisture and since they are
assumed not to contribute moisture, they exert no in-
fluence when soil moisture conditions around them are
unsaturated. Only when Drain 1 flows does it affect sur-
rounding soil moisture potentials. Drain flow limits adja-
cent soil moisture potential to a near-zero value and, as a
result, the gradual wetting at the other drains is arrested.
Figure 8 shows this effect clearly for Drain 2. Eventually, a
steady state condition develops in which all moisture
passes Drains 2 and 3 in the unsaturated state and only
Drain 1 flows. Under these conditions, increasing the
number of drains in the LCR system will have no effect on
LCR system performance. At large enough leak rates,
however, soil moisture potential in the vicinity of the leak
can become positive (fully saturated) and the presence of
a drain in this zone of saturation will improve the LCR
system performance in two ways: the leak can be detected
sooner than if a drain is not located nearby, and informa-
tion about the location of the leak is provided.
    The computer program UNSAT2D is a useful tool for
hydrologic analysis of land storage and disposal facility
designs. The model simulates both saturated and un-
saturated moisture movement in facilities that may contain
flexible membrane liners and leachate detection drains.
Application of this model to a range of landfill, surface im-
poundment, and waste pile designs and  operating condi-
tions has provided considerable insight into their
hydrologic behavior.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    This work was  accomplished in part under EPA Con-
tract 68-01-7310 to provide technical assistance to the EPA
in developing regulations for certain land disposal
facilities. Technical  monitors were Mr. Doug Ammon of the
Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory and
Messrs. Alessi Otte and Walter  DeRieux of the Office of
Solid Waste.

REFERENCES

1.  Haxo, Henry E. Jr., Jelmer A. Miedema, and Nancy A.
   • Nelson, 1984. Permeability  of polymeric membrane lin-
    ing materials. Technical paper, Matercon, Inc.,
    Oakland, California,  10 pp.

2.  van Genuchten, Martinus Th., 1978.  Calculating the
    unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with a new closed-
    form analytical model. Research Report 78-WR-08,
    Water Resources Program, Department of Civil
    Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New
    Jersey, 63 pp.

3.  Wang, Herbert F. and Mary P. Anderson, 1982.
    Introduction to  Groundwater Modeling. Freeman and
    Co., San Francisco, California, 237 pp.

-------
              REMEDIATION  OF  AN  INDUSTRIAL  DUMP  SITE  - A  CASE  HISTORY,  PART II

                  David S. Kosson,  Irene A.  Legiec and Robert C. Ahlert
                     Department  of Chemical and  Biochemical  Engineering
                       Rutgers, The State  University of  New Jersey
                                  College  of Engineering
                                        P.O.  Box 909
                                  Piscataway, NJ  08855


                                         ABSTRACT

     The case history of  the design and implementation of a remediation  strategy  for a
hazardous waste disposal  site is  described.   Sludges resulting from treatment of  diverse
chemical manufacturing effluents  had been  deposited  in an unlined surface  impoundment over
several decades.  "Remediation  of an Industrial Dump Site - A Case History," presented at
the 12th Annual Research  Symposium,  described laboratory and  pilot-scale investigations of
a proposed remedial  strategy.   The  proposed  process  consists  of in-situ  alkaline  sludge
extraction coupled with on-site,  sequential  aerobic-anaerobic, soil-based  microbial
destruction of recovered  organic  contaminants.  First year  pilot plant results, presented
previously, indicated rapid  organic species  extraction from sludges and greater than 95%
destruction of recovered  extract  TOC.  This  paper will focus  on results  from second year
pilot plant operation and analyses,  which  have  been carried out on residuals present after
extraction and treatment  processes.
INTRODUCTION

Site Description

    Over a period of several decades,
industrial waste sludges were landfilled
in an unlined surface impoundment.  During
the period of operation, the compositions
and rates of depositions of sludges varied
greatly.  Primary and secondary sludges
were deposited.  The primary sludges were
lime-neutralized inorganic matter,
including neutralization wastes, spent
catalysts, and solid residues from diverse
chemical manufacturing operations.  The
secondary sludges were biomass from
aerobic treatment of aqueous effluent from
the same manufacturing activities.

    The resulting 4.1 acre site contains
approximately 30,000 cubic yards (yd3) of
sludge.  Two principal layers are found
within the fill" material.  The first layer
of approximately 15,000 yd3 of
secondary sludges 'deposited over a ten-
year period, prior to  1967.  In response
to complaints from local residents about
obnoxious odors, lime was applied to the
secondary sludge.  Subsequently, the limed
sludge was covered with clean fill and
plastic sheeting.  The second layer
consists of approximately 5,000 yd3 of
primary sludge that was transferred to the
site from another lagoon.  This sludge was
deposited over the layers of fill and
plastic sheeting covering the secondary
sludges.  Mounds of shale fill were placed
over the primary sludge to minimize odor
problems.  This gave rise to approximately
10,000 yd3 of contaminated fill  material.
At present, the physical state of the
sludges ranges from solid to gelatinous.
Leachate from the sludges can impact local
groundwater resources.  Detailed
descriptions of the leachate and sludge
characteristics have been presented
previously (1).
                                           -105-

-------
Pilot Plant Description

    Lagoon clean-up is viewed as two
interrelated problems.  The first problem
is the extractive removal of contaminants
from the lagoon without major excavation.
The second problem is treatment of the
extract stream containing the stripped
contaminants, which include organic and
inorganic species.  A research program was
designed to evaluate several treatment
options for the lagoon.  Elements of this
program included forced extraction of
representative sludge samples and
laboratory evaluation of aerobic
(secondary) mixed microbial treatment and
sequential aerobic/anaerobic soil-based
microbial treatment of naturally occurring
leachate and forced extracts (2,3,4).

    The laboratory program led to the
design of a pilot plant incorporating the
most promising renovation strategy.  The
pilot plant employed in-situ extraction of
sludge deposits with aqueous sodium
hydroxide solution (pH between 9 and 13).
(Sodium hydroxide (0.05N) was shown
(1,2,5) to be a very effective extractant
for this lagoon sludge; significantly
different sludges may require other
extractants).  Recovered extract was
treated on-site using a soil-based, mixed
microbial treatment system.  The pilot
system was designed to consist of several
sequential process steps.  A simplified
process flow diagram is presented in
Figure 1; additional detail is available
(1,5).  The first process step was
extraction of sludges present in a
representative section of the lagoon.
Sodium hydroxide solution was mixed  (Tank
1) and injected into the sludges or
applied to the surface of the extraction
bed.  Extract was recovered from the
extraction bed using two wells and
collected in a process tank (Tank 2).

    The second process step was the
adjustment of pH, dilution if necessary,
and addition of nutrients to extract
stored in Tank 2.  This occurred
continously in a baffled process tank
(Tank 3).  The third process step was
treatment of the modified extract
(effluent from Tank 3) in an
aerobic/anaerobic bioreactor.  Treatment
occurred  in a lined soil bed in which  an
aerobic microbial population was
maintained in the upper region and an
anaerobic microbial population was
maintained in the lower region.  Extract
applied to the surface of the treatment
      H,O
       TO -*•
     DISCHARGE
                                                                                ITRIENTS
                                                             MIXING TANK
                                                               (Tank 3)
                                  TREATMENT BED


             Figure 1.  Simplfied process flow diagram.
                                            -106-

-------
bed percolated through the soil  column
where organic contaminants were
biodegraded.  Effluent from the treatment
bed was recovered through a screened well
and pumped into a storage tank (Tank 4)
prior to recycle or discharge.

    Operation of the pilot plant commenced
in July 1985 and continued until freezing
conditions necessitated a winter shutdown.
During 1985, extraction bed effluent pH,
total organic carbon (TOC), and total
dissolved solids (IDS) were initially
approximately 10, 11,000 mg/1, and 28,000
mg/1, respectively.  Recovered extract pH
initially declined as previously applied
lime was extracted, and then increased to
9.5, in response to additipn of sodium
hydroxide extractant.  Extract TOC and IDS
both declined during 130 days  of operation
to approximately 4,000 mg/1 and 8,000
mg/1, respectively.  Influent  TOC to the
treatment bed was controlled during
prolonged intervals to 1000 mg/1 and 2000
mg/1.  Integrated TOC reduction  for the
entire 1985 period of operation  was
   greater than 95% on a mass basis.  Steady
   state TOC reduction, after microbial
   population development, was greater than
   PILOT PLANT OPERATION DURING 1986

   Extraction Bed Results

        Completion of pilot plant repairs to
   correct cold weather damage resulted in
   full operation start up for the second
   operating season in June 1986.  During
   1986, extraction bed effluent pH, TOC and
   TDS were intially approximately 9.7, 6,000
   mg/1, and 13,000 mg/1, respectively.
   Extract pH remained generally between 9.4
   and 9.8 during operation, while extract
   TOC and TDS declined rapidly after 40 days
   of operation.  Extract TOC and TDS were
   approximately 2,200 mg/1 and 7,500 mg/1,
   respectively.  The TOC response of
   recovered extract is presented in Figure
   2.  The initially elevated extract
                                 EXTRACTION  BED
                                     1986 EFFLUENT TOC
              S -
             '4 -
              3 -
                                  40
—i—
 60
                                                      BO
                                                               10O
                                                                         120
                                        TIUS (days)
                              O  WELL f        + ' WELL

                                        Figure 2.
                                         -107-

-------
concentrations, relative to 1985 results,
are attributed to the extended extract-
sludge contact period during the winter.
The apparent response delay during 1986
was between 40 and 50 days.  Average
hydraulic flux through the extraction bed
during 1986 was 8.6 1/nrday, as compared
to 3.7 l/ra2day for 1985.
     Several physical changes were
apparent in the extraction bed during
operation.  Extended periods of extraction
during 1985 and 1986 resulted in
settlement of the sludges within the
extraction bed of between 0.5 and 1.0 ft.
In addition, as extraction progressed, the
surficial sludges appeared to become more
friable.  This observation was further
supported by increasing sludge
permeability during operation.
Treatment Bed Results

      Influent and effluent volumetric
fluxes for the treatment bed varied
between 3.6 and 9.4 1/nrday, depending on
mode  of operation* as compared to between
15.1  and 17.9 l/mzday during 1985.
           Throughout operation, influent pH was
           targeted to be maintained between 7.5  and
           8.0 although occasional power supply
           interruptions resulted in brief periods of
           influent pH between 8.0 and 8.5.  Effluent
           pH remained between 6.3 and 6.8 throughout
           operation.

                Influent and effluent TOC data for
           the treatment bed are presented in Figure
           3.  Influent TOC was maintained at
           approximately 1,200 mg/1 for 30 days
           following a brief start up with a
           glucose/nutrient medium.  Note, no
           microbial inoculum was used for startup in
           1986.  After day 40 of operation, the
           influent TOC to the treatment bed was
           adjusted to between 2,000 and 2,500 mg/1.
           In contrast to the microbial acclimation
           period observed during 1985, no
           substantial microbial acclimation period
           was apparent from the effluent TOC
           responses.  Increased effluent TOC after
           day 70 was a delayed  response to
           increased influent TOC starting day 40.
           Integrated TOC reduction over
           the entire period of operation was greater
           than 99%, on a mass basis.  Typical TOC
           treatment capacity ranged from 7 to 22
           g/nrday, which was in close agreement with
           laboratory soil column data (6).
                                   TREATMENT  BED
                                 1988 INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT TOC
             4000
             3000 -




             2000 -




             1000 -




                 0-
                 *•

              100 -
         a       a
     o    a   a
                        a  Da DQ
a D
                           ZO        40        BO        80

                                           TIUB (days)
                             0   INFLUENT         +  EFFLUENT

                                           Figure 3.
                                                                  100
                                                                            120
                                           -108-

-------
EXTRACTION BED RESIDUALS ANALYSIS

Extraction of Split-Spoon Core Samples

     At the conclusion of operation of the
extraction bed, split-spoon sampling was
carried out to retrieve sludge samples for
laboratory analysis.  Four cores were
obtained at the conclusion of operation in
1985 and two cores were obtained at the
conclusion of operation in 1986.  Core
locations within the extraction bed are
indicated in Figure 4.  The samples
retrieved were segregated by core number
and sampling depth.  Each split spoon
sample retrieved represented a two foot
deep core section.  A description of
sludge composition as a function of depth
is presented in Table 1.

     Sixteen of the core samples obtained
in 1986 were extracted in the laboratory
with 0.05N sodium hydroxide solution to
evaluate the uniformity and effectiveness
of the extraction bed operation.  Each
core sample tested was homogenized
TABLE 1.  EXTRACTION BED CORE SAMPLE
          DESCRIPTIONS
Depth
(ft)
Sludge Description
0-2         Primary
2-4         Primary
4-6         Primary
6-8         Primary
8-10        Primary with some secondary
10-12       Even mixture of primary and
            secondary
12-14       Secondary
14-16       Secondary with some clay
16-18       Secondary with some clay
18-20       Even mixture of secondary
            and clay
20-22       Clay with some secondary
                                EXTRACTION BED
                          3('8S)  !
                                               2('86)
                                                                  TREATMENT
                                                                     BED
                                                • 1986 CORE SAMPLES
                                                « 1985 CORE SAMPLES
                                                • INJECTION POINTS (6)
             Figure 4.  Extraction bed core locations.
                                          -109-

-------
Individually and two 10-g aliquots  were
shaken with 100 ml  of the sodium hydroxide
extractant for 40 hours on a rotary
shaker.  The resulting mixture was
separated into solid and liquid phases
through centrifugation and filtration.
Recovered extract was analyzed for  TOC;
results are presented in Figure 5.   The
extract TOC data indicates a pocket of
inefficiently extracted sludges between
depths of 6 and 12 ft, while sludges
present outside of that pocket were
extracted fairly thoroughly.  Review of
previously obtained information indicated
that plastic sheeting was present at
depths of "approximately 4 and 12 ft, while
injection points were screened at depths
between 11 and 13 ft.  Although plastic
sheeting was pierced using a rod at
regular intervals,  pockets of irregular
hydraulic flow persisted.  This indicates
the necessity of careful placement  of
injection points during scale-up.

     In addition to extractable TOC
analysis, volatile solids content (weight
loss upon ignition at 550 C from sludge
previously dried at 105 C for 24 hr) was
determined for each homogenized sludge
sample (7).   Results  of analysis  carried
out in 1984  on untreated primary  and
secondary sludge samples was  compared to
results obtained from Core  1  (1986) at
depths of 4-6 ft and  12-14  ft.  These
particular samples were considered
representative of primary and secondary  .
sludges before and after effective  in-situ
extraction.   The comparison is  presented
in Table 2.
Neutralization and teachability of Final
Residuals
     Laboratory experiments  were  carried
out to determine the quantity of  acid
required to neutralize the solid  residuals
present after in-situ extraction  was
completed and assess the Teachability  of
neutralized residuals.  Thus, a possible
process end-state was investigated.  The
quantity of acid required was determined
by titration of 10-g aliquots of  the
homogenized core samples, shaken  in  100 ml
of distilled water and titrated with 1.0 N
sulfuric acid.  Samples were shaken  on a
               NAOH  EXTRACTION  OF  CORE  SAMPLES
            1.2
                                    19BB EQUILIBRIUM TOC
               0-S'
                          4-B'
                                        DEPTH (feet)
                              Q   CORE 1       +   CORE ,

                                        Figure 5.
                                          -110-

-------
rotary shaker  until a constant pH was
obtained after each addition of titrant
(approximately 40 hrs).  Samples were
considered  neutralized after an
equilibrium pH of 5.0 was achieved.   Solid
and liquid  phases of the resultant
neutralized mixture were separated by
centrifugation and filtration.  The
recovered aqueous phase subsequently was
assayed for TOC.  The number of
equivalents of acid required to neutralize
each titration mixture and the resultant
equilibrium TOCs are reported in Figure 6.
The number  of  equivilents of acid required
to neutralize  sludge samples correlated
closely with the amount of Teachable
residual  TOC.  In addition, TOC
Teachability from core samples was
approximately  ten times less for
neutralized samples than for samples
similarly extracted with 0.05 N sodium
hydroxide solution (Figure 5).
TABLE 2.   SLUDGE CHARACTERISTICS
          BEFORE & AFTER IN-SITU
          EXTRACTION
               Before   After   Change
               (1984)   (1986)
               fmg/q) _ fmg/g)^f%)_
TOC Extracted with 0.05 N NaOH:

    Primary       3.2      1.1    65
    Secondary      8.7      1.4    84

Volatile Solids:
Primary
Secondary
200
320
45
22
78
93
               NEUTRALIZED  CORE  SAMPLE  RESULTS
       I
0.60-


0.40 -
0.30 -

0.20 -

0.10 -
i
o.oo -
«_ OPEN SYMBOLS A FILLED SYMBOLS _,„
(# of Equivalents (TOC)
of Acid) *
A




•»

A
* : * :
o A i
I i i i i i i i i i i r •'
-110
-too
- 90

- 80
-"8
- 60 ^
- SO ^
-40
- 30
- 20
- 10
- n
              0-2
                      4-e
                              e-a
                                      8-10   1O-12   12-14   16-18   20-22
                                      DEPTH (Jaot)
                                CORK 1       A   CORE 2

                                      Figure 6.
                                         -Ill-

-------
CONCLUSIONS

     Operation of a large-scale pilot
plant on-site at an industrial  sludge
impoundment successfully demonstrated  the
feasibility of  in-situ  alkaline extraction
followed by on-site soil-based microbial
treatment as a  renovation  process,  for
this case.  Extraction uniformity was
influenced heavily by extractant injection
locations and local hydraulics.   Solid
residuals present after  in-situ sludge
extraction can  be neutralized  through
addition of limited quantities of mineral
acid.   Neutralized  residuals leach greatly
reduced amounts of TOC.   In addition,
soil-based sequential  aerobic/anaerobic
microbial treatment removed greater than
99% of the TOC, on a mass basis, present
in the recovered extract.
ACKNOWLEGEMENT AND DISCLAIMER

     The work described  in this paper was
funded  in  part  by U.S.EPA under
Cooperative Agreement  CR807805.   Dr. John
Brugger was  the project officer.   The  use
of trade names does  not  constitute  or
imply endorsement of any kind.
4. Kosson, D.S., R.C. Ahlert, J.D.  Boyer,
   E.A. Dienemann, and J.F. Magee II,
   1985.   "Development  and Application  of
   On-site Technologies  for Sludge Filled
   Lagoons",  Proceedings International
   Conference on  New Frontiers for
   Hazardous  Waste  Management, EPA-600/9-
    85/025, 118-127.

5. Kosson, D.S.,  E.A. Dienemann, and R.C.
   Ahlert, 1986a.   "Field  Studies  of  In-
   Situ Extraction  and Soil-Based
   Microbial  Treatment  of  an  Industrial
   Sludge Lagoon",  Proceedings of
   Hazardous  Hastes and Hazardous
   Materials  (HMCRI),  March 4-6, Atlanta,
   6A.

6. Kosson, D.S.,  I.A. Legiec,  E.A.
   Dienemann, and R.C. Ahlert, 1986b.
   "Operation and Control  of a Soil-Based
   Microbial Treatment System", AICHE
   Summer National Meeting, August,
   Boston, MA.

7. Standard Methods  for  the Examination of
   Mater and Uastewater, 1985, 16th Ed.,
   APHA, AWWA,  WPCF, Washington,  D.C.,
   96-98.
 REFERENCES

 1.  Ahlert,  R.C.,  and D.S.  Kosson,  1986.
    "Remediation  of an Industrial  Dump Site
    - A Case History", Proceedings of 12th
    Annual Research Symposium,  EPA-600/9-
    86/022,  73-89.

 2.  Boyer, J.D.,  M.B. King, D.S.  Kosson,
    and R.C. Ahlert, 1985.    "Aerobic
    Biodegradation of Leachate and Forced
    Extract  from a Sludge Disposal  Lagoon",
    Toxic and Hazardous Wastes, Technomic
    Publishing Co., Lancaster,  Pa., 497-
    508.

 3.  Dienemann, E.A., J.F. Magee II, D.S.
    Kosson,  and R.C. Ahlert, in press.
    "Rapid Renovation of a Sludge Lagoon",
    Environmental Progress.
                                            -112-

-------
                CAPILLARITY AND ANISOTROPY EFFECTS ON GROUND-WATER FLOW
                                     TO EXCAVATION
                                    Forest 0. Mixon
                              Research Triangle Institute
                           Research Triangle Park, NC  27709
                                       ABSTRACT

    In a hazardous waste disposal facility located in a saturated soil, the local water
table and the capillary fringe zone are modified by the presence of the facility.  In
this paper, a conformal mapping solution to the accompanying ground-water flow is
discussed.  The flow net around an excavation is calculated and displayed in terms of
the capillarity, local geometry and flow properties.

    Capillarity can significantly influence net flow into an excavation; typical  values
can cause net flow to be 10 to 20 percent higher than predicted without capillarity.
Anisotropic behavior can also be important.  It is shown that anisotropy favoring
horizontal flow can greatly alter the flow net and the total flow.
INTRODUCTION

    There is increasing interest in the
possibilities of siting hazardous waste
disposal facilities in locations at which
the water table (or the tension-saturated
zone immediately above) is near the
ground surface (1, 2).  This situation is
normal in saturated low-permeability
soils which exist at various locations of
the country but which predominate in the
eastern United States because of higher
rainfalls and local geologic conditions.

    A disposal facility so located would
be beneath the water table, and thus
would influence the local  flow dynamics,
including the water table and the
capillary fringe (3).  The prediction of
these effects is the problem of concern
in this paper.  Also considered are the
effects of anisotropy on the local  ground
water flow.
    The problem to be addressed is
presented schematically in Figure 1,
which shows a disposal facility,
idealized as a two-dimensional
rectangular excavation, sited such that
its lower surface is beneath the normal
water table.  As in a well, there is a
tendency for ground water to flow into
the excavation.  A complicating factor,
however, is capillary attraction, which
draws fluid into the soil  interstices and
creates a zone of negative pressure, the
capillary fringe or tension-saturated
zone.
    •Figure 1 shows the excavation, the
flow profile into the excavation
including lines of constant potential  and
stream function, the free surface
(immediately beneath which P = -Hc),  and
the water table (along which P = 0).   (A
                                          -113-

-------
                              -202

                                   Horizontal Distance — halfwidths
               Figure  1.   Schematic  of disposal  facility  slightly  below
                          normal  water table.
List of Symbols is provided at the end of
the paper).

    In the capillary fringe, the region
between the water table and free surface,
the physical picture is that of individual
granules whose interstices contain no
significant vapor bubbles (4, 5).  This
zone 1s normally referred to as the
tension-saturated zone or the negative
pressure zone.

    Above the top of the capillary fringe,
the physical appearance is that of
Individual granules whose interstices are
filled primarily with vapor or gas bubbles
(4, 5).  This region is referred to as the
unsaturated zone and its moisture content
normally decreases with elevation or
Increases with depth.

APPROACH

    Our purpose is to assess the effects
of the capillary fringe on the fluid flow
patterns 1n the neighborhood of the
excavation.  This is done by formulating
and solving the equations of motion for
the flow field with the equilibrium
capillary rise, Hc, as an adjustable
parameter.  Comparative analysis of the
solutions for various values of the
equilibrium rise should reveal  and
quantify its effects.

    Classical potential theory (6), which
applies here, and in which the flow is
proportional to the gradient of some
potential, provides a relatively easily
visualizable and familiar representation
of the flow field in the form of the flow
net.  This net is comprised of lines of
constant potential, say 0, and orthogonal,
or perpendicular, lines of constant stream
function, say ^.  The lines of constant
stream function, or stream lines,
represent particle tracks in steady flow;
hence no fluid flows across these lines.
Any two such lines form a stream tube,
through which the total flow is constant.

    A particularly simple flow net is
shown in the rectangle in the center of
Figure 2.   In this flow net, the
horizontal  lines represent lines of
constant potential, 0, and the vertical
lines represent stream lines or lines of
constant stream function, $.  Thus the
flow field  represented by this rectangle
is uniform  flow from high potential to low
potential,  thus uniformly upward.

    Imagine now that the lines of constant
potential and flow lines in this rectangle
                                           -114-

-------
                    Ground Surface
                     Figure 2.  Schematic of overview mapping.
 (Figure 2) are drawn on  an  infinitely
 stretchable thin sheet of rubber.   Imagine
 moreover that this rectangular piece of
 rubber is positioned and deformed as
 indicated in the figure  so  that the
 outside edges correspond as indicated to
 the centerline of the excavation, the
 bottom of the pit, and the  free surface.
 If this stretching is done  in such a way
 that angles are preserved,  e.g.,
 conformally, then the resulting
 curvilinear network comprising the  (now
 deformed) lines of constant potential and
 constant stream function, represents a new
 flow field, the one sought  in this study.

    Conformal mapping is a  mathematical
 formalism for accomplishing  this
 stretching.  In a typical application, a
 simple flow configuration (the rectangle)
 is mapped onto a more complicated geometry
 (the disposal facility)  in  such a way that
 the important mathematical  features of the
 flow net are preserved and  the resulting
 curvilinear flow net is  a theoretically
 accurate representation of the flow field
 in the more complex geometry.  The
mathematical  formalisms are developed
 elsewhere (7) and solutions are presented
 from which the behavior at various values
of the capillarity can be compared.
SCALING              .   ,   .   .

     In this analysis, all  distances have
been scaled to the excavation half-width,
including the equilibrium  capillary rise,
Hc.  Moreover, all velocities have been
scaled to the free-drain velocity, which
is superficial velocity resulting from a
head gradient of unity  (1  ft/ft).  Thus, a
value of A = 1 would correspond  to a flow
velocity given by
operating over the area of the excavation
bottom.

    For present purposes, it is adequate
to consider the quantity A as simply a
measure of relative flow into the
excavation.

ANALYSIS OF CAPILLARITY

    Computed results illustrating the
effects of capillarity are shown in
Figures 1 and 3.  Figure 1,  in addition to
serving as a schematic of the problem, is
also a flow map included to establish
axes,  scales, and formats for Figure 3.
The latter figure represents a compilation
                                          -115-

-------
                        0.4
                        OS
                                 0.2
                                               0.4
                                           Flow Into Excavation
                                         Fraction of Free-Drain Flow
                                                              OS
          Figure 3.  The effects of total flow into the excavation and the
                     equilibrium capillary rise on the resulting net rise.
of cases, plotted to the same scale as in
Figure 1, but omitting, for convenience,
the location of the water table, and
reduced so as to fit on the same sheet for
comparative purposes.

    Referring to Figure 3, moving to the
right increases A, the relative flow into
the excavation.  The second and third
columns of figures represent progressively
lower positions of the excavation base
with respect to the water table, hence,
higher flows into the facility.

    Moving downward in Figure 3
corresponds to increasing the equilibrium
capillary rise, Hc.  An interesting
feature is the extent to which the
elevation of the free surface at the
excavation wall is dependent upon A, the
relative flow.  The point of intersection
is bounded from below by the equilibrium
capillary rise and increases with flow, A.

    The effects of capillarity can be
further quantified as shown in Figures 4
and 5.  To generate these figures, the
hydraulic gradient in the vicinity of the
excavation was first estimated for each
case in Figure 3.  This was done by first
estimating the gradient as the slope of
the line segment connecting the corner of
the excavation to the location of the
water table 4.5 half-widths away.
Crossplotting the resulting information as
flow vs. gradient with capillarity as a
parameter gives Figure 4.  Expressing flow
as a percent increase over the no
capillarity case gives Figure 5.

    The analysis shows that capillarity
does, indeed, increase the net flow into
the excavation by small, but significant
amounts, with the increase being roughly
proportional to the equilibrium capillary
ri se.

    Figures 4 and 5 can be utilized to
estimate the flow into the excavation.
First, one estimates the local gradient of
the water table and then, with Figure 4,
determines the no-capillarity flow.  Next,
one estimates the capillarity from grain
size or by some other method.  Figure 5 is
then used to predict the net increase in
the flow.
                                          -116-

-------
                             0.04
0.08      0.12     0.16

 Approximate Hydraulic Gradient
               Figure 4.  Effect of hydraulic gradient on  relative flow.
                              0.2           0.4           0.6

                                 Equilibrium Capillary Rise — halfwidths
               Figure 5.  Effect  of capillarity on relative flow.
    Physically,  one can reason that  flow
increases with  capillarity because the
capillary rise  provides more lateral  area
for flow to  cross for a fixed hydraulic
gradient.
           ANALYSIS  OF ANISOTROPY

               Soils can be quite anisotropic,  with
           horizontal  permeabilities exceeding  values
           by several  orders of magnitude  (3).

               Omitting mathematical details,
           anisotropic flow profiles cases  have been
           computed  with values of Kx/Ky from 1 to
           64.  Graphical  results from these
                                            -117-

-------
calculations are summarized in  Figures  I
and 6.

    Figure 1, as before, establishes axes,
scales and formats for Figure 6.  The
latter figure represents a compilation  of
cases, plotted to the same scale as that
used in Figure 1, reduced so as to fit  on
the same sheet for comparative purposes.

    Referring to Figure 6, moving downward
Increases the capillarity, Hc.  Moving  to
the right corresponds to increasing the
anisotropy, specifically the x-direction
permeability relative to that in the y-
direction.  The results are as one would
expect, though the magnitude is
surprisingly large.  Further analysis
follows in Figure 7 which was generated
from the computed results for the special
case of intermediate capillarity (Hc =
0.4) by the following procedure.

    Approximate hydraulic gradients were
estimated as the slopes of the  line
segments connecting the corner of the
excavation to the water table 4.5 half-
widths way.  Relative flow from  (into)  the
excavation, the A values, were then
plotted against these hydraulic gradients
with the permeability ratio as a
parameter.

    Intuitively, it is expected that
increasing the horizontal permeability
while holding the vertical permeability
constant would have the effect of
increasing the flow from  (into) the
excavation for a given hydraulic gradient.
The figure shows that this is indeed the
case, quite dramatically.  Consider a
hydraulic gradient of 0.1.  Increasing the
permeability ratio fourfold, from 1 to 4,
results in an approximate threefold
increase in flow into the excavation, from
A « 0.5 to A « 1.5.  Another fourfold
increase in the permeability ratio (to 16)
results in an approximate fourfold
increase in flow, to A «6.  Still another
fourfold increase in the permeability
ratio (to 64) gives quite a dramatic
increase in the flow, from about 6 to much
greater than 32.

    The following generalized rule-of-
thumb seems to apply:  In the two-
dimensional approximation, the ground-
water flow from  (into) an excavation
            0.05
            0.1
            0.2
                      1.0
                                    4              16

                                 Horizontal to Vertical Conductivity Ratio
                                                                 64
                     Figure 6.   Effect of anisot-ropy on flow map.
                                          -118-

-------
                       32
                       30
                       28
                       26

                     1-24

                     I 22
                     | 20
                     u5 18

                     I «
                     1 14
                     C 12

                     l»
                     IT  8
                        6
                        4
                        2
                        0
                                   0.1         0.2         0.3

                                      Approximate Hydraulic Gradient
                  Figure 7.   Effect of anisotropy on flow into excavation.
approximately doubles for every doubling
of Kx with constant Ky.  The effect is
stronger at large values of the
permeability ratio, e.g., for Kx/Ky > 16.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

    Fine-textured soils, e.g., clays have
capillary radii in the range of 10~4 to
10~5 centimeters.  Corresponding values
for the free-drain velocity, v0, are in.
the range of 5 x 10~6 to 5 x 10~8 cm/sec
(1 to 0.001 gal/day-ft2).  Moreover,
equilibrium capillary rise values for such
soils can exceed 50 ft.

    For illustrative purposes, assume a
soil with free-drain velocity of 1 x 10~6
cm/sec (0.2 gal/day-ft2).  Assume moreover
that one is considering the ground-water
flow into a long trench-like disposal
facility whose width is 100 ft which is
located in a soil exhibiting an
equilibrium capillary rise of 25 ft.  Then
the equilibrium capillary rise is 0.5
excavation half-widths.  If, moreover, the
local hydraulic gradient in the vicinity
of the excavation is 0.05, then, from
Figure 4, the relative flow into the
excavation in the absence of capillarity
is about 0.14.  Hence the estimated total
flow is 0.14 x 0.2 gal/day-ft2, or 0.028
gal/day-ft2.

    What effect would one anticipate from
including capillarity?  From Figure 5, at
an equilibrium capillarity rise of 0.5
half-widths, one would expect the flow
into the excavation to be almost 20
percent higher than estimated for no
capillarity.

CONCLUSIONS

    A method has been demonstrated for the
formulation and solution of ground-water
flow problems involving a free surface,
e.g., a conceptual interface between
liquid-filled interstices and vapor-filled
interstices.  This method has been applied
to predict the effects of capillarity and
anisotropy on flow patterns in the
vicinity of a disposal facility located
beneath the local water table.

    The solution to the problem for zero
capillarity provides a baseline estimate
of the flow into the excavation in terms
of the local hydraulic gradient.

    The effect of capillarity is to draw
fluid vertically into the soil interstices
and thence to open the area through which
                                          -119-

-------
 fluid  can  flow into  the  excavation.
 Capillarity thus  causes  the  flow into  an
 excavation to  increase over  the  no
 capillarity case;  the magnitude  of the
 increase can be on the order of  10 to  20
 percent of the total flow and is higher
 for higher hydraulic gradients.

     Soils  frequently exhibit anisotropic
 flow behavior  in  that the horizontal
 hydraulic  conductivity is greater than the
 vertical.   This phenomenon can increase
 the net flow substantially at a  given
 hydraulic  gradient as a  result of the  more
 open horizontal flow path for liquid
 motion.
 LIST OF SYMBOLS
P

x, y


a


v

P
                 Value  of  stream  function
                 at  lower  right corner  of
                 excavation,  hence  a
                 measure of  flow  volume to
                 (from) excavation, L.
                Gravitational  acceleration
                L/T-2
Equilibrium height of
capillary rise above water
table.

Heterogeneity half-length,
L.

Permeability, permeability
components, L2

Manometer pressure, L.

Horizontal and vertical
position coordinates, L.
(Ky /K


Kinematic viscosity, L /T.

Bulk mass density of
fluid, M/L3 .
                Piezometric potential, P +
                y, L.

                Stream function, L.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The research described in this article
has been funded wholly or in part by the
United States Environmental Protection
Agency through Contract No. 68-03-3149,
Task No. 26-1, to the Research Triangle
Institute.  It has been subject to and
approved for publication.  Approval does
not signify that the content necessarily
reflect the views and policies of the
Agency, nor does mention of tradenames or
commercial products constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.  Technical
guidance from the Project Officer,
Jonathan G. Herrmann, is greatly
acknowledged.

REFERENCES

1.  Proceedings, U.S. EPA Workshop.
    October 4-5, 1985.  Monitoring
    considerations in the siting and
    operation of hazardous waste disposal
    facilities in temperate zone wet
    environments, Tallahassee, FL.

2.  Smith, E. D. 1974.  Hydrogeologic
    assessment of zone-of-saturation
    landfill  design.  CONF-8405143,
    Environmental Sciences Division, Oak
    Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge,
    TN.

3.  Martin, J. P. and R. M. Koerner. 1984.
    The influence of vadose zone
    conditions in groundwater pollution.
    Part II:  Fluid movement,  J. Hazardous
    Materials, 9, 181-207.

4.  Freeze, R. A. and J. A. Cherry. 1979.
    Groundwater,  Prentice-Hall,  Englewood
    Cliffs, NJ.

5.  Sowers, G. B. and G. F. Sowers. 1961.
    Introductory soil  mechanics  and
    foundations,  3rd Edn., MacMillan,  New
    York.                              .

6.  Lamb,  H. 1945.  Hydrodynamics,  Dover
    Publications, New York.

7.  Mixon,  F.  0.  1987.   Capillarity and
    anisotropy effects  on ground-water
    flow to excavation,  prepared for
    Ground-Water.
                                          -120-

-------
         PATHWAYS FOR THE REMOVAL OF VOLATILE ORGANICS FROM SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
                      Crowley Clark Allen and Jeffrey Bryan Coburn
                               Research Triangle Institute
                         Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
                                        ABSTRACT

    A series of surface impoundments have been investigated to determine the significance
of biological oxidation as a major pathway for volatile organic removal.  Measurements of
the volatile organic concentrations, pH, and dissolved oxygen have been taken from active
surface impoundments.  Wastewater was removed from selected impoundments, and the rate of
oxygen uptake and the compound specific fate of the volatiles was evaluated in the labora-
tory under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions.  A biocide was used to evaluate the
significance of biological activity relative to chemical reactions.  The results'indicated
that biological activity is common in surface impoundments.  The biological removal of
specific components at one impoundment was low relative to the anticipated volatilization
rates.
INTRODUCTION

    The United States Environmental
Protection Agency is developing regula-
tions to control the emissions of volatile
organics (VO) from hazardous waste treat-
ment, storage, and disposal facilities.
Facultative lagoon systems present a
potential source of emissions of this type
as they provide an opportunity for mass
transfer of VO from the aqueous phase to
the atmosphere.  Properly designed and
operated biological wastewater treatment
systems protect water quality by removing
organic chemicals from wastewater prior to
discharge; the actual fate (biodegraded,
transferred to the air, or removed in a
separate sludge stream) of this material
is uncertain.  Visits to three non-aerated
wastewater management facilities were made
to determine the composition of wastewater
in the lagoon and the potential for bio-
degradation and air emissions. (1, 2, 3)
SITE DESCRIPTIONS

Description of Site A

    Site A produces aldehydes, glycols,
glycol ethers, nitriles, esters, and other
products.  Wastewater and runoff are col-
lected at different points within the
manufacturing area of the plant.  The
wastewater flows to a series of seven
oxidation basins.  Some of the effluent
from the basins is pumped to a series of
four large unlined facultative basins
prior.to discharge.  Wastewater samples
were collected from the first facultative
basin (60 acres in area). The discharge
permit application for Site A includes the
following information about the long-term
average, final effluent:  BOD, 21 mg/L;
COD, 384 mg/L; TOC, 127 mg/L; TSS, 43
mg/L; methylene chloride, 18 /»g/L;
acenaphthylene, 10 /tg/L; bis (2-ethyl
hexyl) phthalate, 24 ug/L; naphthalene, 4
      (1)
                                          -121-

-------
Description of Site B
DO Profile Results
    Site B has two adjacent facilities (a
refinery and a lube oil plant), and each
facility has its own wastewater treatment
system.  Each wastewater treatment system
contains a RCRA-regulated polishing pond
near the end of the system.  Wastewater
samples were collected from each of these
polishing ponds for chemical analysis and
biological activity testing.  In June
1986, upstream from the polishing pond,
the wastewater contained 82.7 mg/L COD,
33.7 mg/L TSS, and 0.9 mg/L phenols. (2)

Description of Site C

    Site C 1s a commercial waste facility
which treats dilute aqueous waste.  The
following four lagoons were sampled:
Lagoon B, an evaporation pond; Lagoon C,
an evaporation pond which receives the
overflow from B; Lagoon D, a .holding pond;
and Lagoon E, a solids settling pond.
Samples were taken from the southeast
corner and the west end of Lagoon B; only
one sampling location was employed in
Lagoons C, D, and E.  The wastewater at
Site C contains a variety of dilute «20
ppm) organic compounds. (3)

TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS

    Samples for chemical analysis were
collected in one liter amber glass bottles
with Teflon-Hned screw caps and in 40 ml
zero headspace septum bottles.  The sam-
ples were transported on ice and refriger-
ated until analyzed.  Aside from refriger-
ation, the samples were not preserved.

    At the chemical analysis sampling
points, additional samples were obtained
for biodegradation rate studies.  Waste-
water was pumped into five gallon Nalgene
containers and shipped to RTI without
refrigeration or preservation.

    Dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements
were made at different depths at the sam-
pling points using a YSI Model 54A dis-
solved oxygen meter calibrated against
saturated air.  The pH of the wastewater
at each sampling point was determined
using short range pH paper.
    The results of the DO profile measure-
ments are presented in Figure 1.  At Site
A the DO was greater than saturated except
for the bottom of the lagoon.  A high
concentration of algae in the upper level
of the lagoon in combination with the
bright sunlight produced super-saturated
conditions throughout much of the water.
This also is the likely cause for the high
pH (approximately 9) as carbon dioxide was
removed from the water photosynthetically.

    The DO concentration in the refinery
polishing pond at Site B was about 8 mg/L
independent of liquid depth; the pH was
approximately 7.  The DO concentration in
the lube oil polishing pond at Site B was
about 3 mg/L independent of liquid depth;
the pH was approximately 7.

    All lagoons at Site C had DO concen-
trations of less than 1.0 mg/L indicating
that the. lagoons were primarily anaerobic.
A1J of the wastewater collected except
from Lagoon E, had a pH of 8-8.5; Lagoon E
wastewater had a pH of approximately 13.

Analytical Results

    The wastewater samples at Sites A and
B were analyzed for volatile organics
using EPA Method 624 for purgeables and
EPA Method 625 for base/neutral and acid
extractables.  None of the Method 624 or
625 compounds were present above detection
limits in the lagoons.

    Samples from Site C were analyzed for
specific volatile organics using EPA
Method 624 for purgeables and EPA Method
625 for base/neutral and acid extract-
ables.  Acetone was present at concentra-
tions of 1.6, 0.05, 2.8, and 16 ppm for
Lagoons B, C, D, and E, respectively.
Lagoons D and E also contained over 10 ppm
methylene chloride, and approximately 1
ppm 1,1,1-trichloroethane, Freon 113,
toluene, and total xylenes.  No other VO
were detected in Lagoons B and C.

Microorganisms

    The presence of microorganisms in the
wastewater at Site A was Initially con-
firmed by microscopy studies.  Several
different microorganisms were observed
using wet drop slides.  These include:
                                          -122-

-------
coccoid blue-green algal (Phylum
Cyanophyta, anacystis sp.); protozoans
(both flagelates and cilliates, numerous
species); and green algae (particularly
arthrospira).

    Site B also contained microorganisms.
Several different microorganisms were
observed using wet drop slides.  These
include:  protozoans (both flagelates and
cilliates, numerous species); and green
algae (particularly arthrospira).

    The wastewater from Site C contained
no motile microorganisms that were ob-
served using wet drop slides.  Wastewater
samples taken from two locations in Lagoon
B appeared to have agglomerations of
coccoid blue-green algae.  The abundance
of inorganic solids, however, especially
in the Lagoon D sample, hindered the wet
drop slide studies.  Both filamentous and
nonfilamentous bacteria were observed
using Gram-stained slides of Lagoon B, Q,
and D samples.  Both gram-positive bac-
teria (stained purple) and gram-negative
bacteria  (stained red) were observed.  No
cell cultures were grown to further char-
acterize the bacteria.

Aerobic Biological Testing

    The first experiment to measure the
oxygen consumption rate of the microorgan-
isms measured the dissolved oxygen (DO)
depletion rate.  The procedure employed
was as follows.  A wide mouth, amber
glass, pint bottle was filled with the
wastewater sample and allowed to come to
thermal equilibrium.  Air was then bubbled
through the sample for approximately 5
minutes to raise the initial DO concentra-
tion.  A magnetic stir bar was added to  '
the sample bottle.  The lid, fitted with a
DO probe, was secured allowing the waste-
water to overflow in order to insure zero
headspace within the bottle.  The sample
was stirred using a magnetic stirrer and
the DO concentration was recorded with
time.                        ,

    In the second method for measuring the
oxygen uptake rate (the BOD-type experi-
ment), 250 mL of sample was added to a
pint amber glass respirometry bottle.  The
respirometry bottle lid has a tube fitting
to allow the bottle to be connected to a
mercury manometer.  A T-connector was
inserted  in the manometer tubing; lithium
hydroxide was poured in the side tube to'
absorb produced carbon dioxide and the
side tube was sealed.  The bottle was then
clamped in a wrist-action shaker and suf-
ficiently agitated to ensure that oxygen
transfer was n6t rate limiting.  The pres-
sure drop resulting from aerobic (oxygen
consuming) biological activity was mea-
sured with the mercury manometer as a
function of time.
                     - ^

    The initial oxygen consumption rate in
the wastewater from Site A was 2.4 * 0.2
mg/L-hr (95%) and 137 mg/L BOD was con-
sumed after 90 hours.  The data are sum-
marized in Table 1.

    The data from the oxygen depletion
from Site B are presented graphically in
Figure 2.  A least squares linear regres-
sion was performed on the data and the
calculated slopes provide the observed
zero order oxygen utilization rates.  Note
that the data for the refinery wastewater
sample do not fit a linear curve very well
(R2 = 0.9813).

    Presuming that the reaction is first
order in substrate concentration (i.e.,
BOD), the reaction rate equation becomes':
  rate
 d(DO)
~~dt
k(BOD).
(D
Since the DO uptake (DOUn t) Is simply the
difference in the original BOD (BOD0) and
the BOD at time t, Equation 1 can be
rewritten as:
        - DOuprt/BOD0)  =  -kt.
                         (2)
The BOD0 value which best fit Equation 2
(i.e., y-intercept of zero) was 8.89 mg/L;
the value of k at this BOD0 was 0.0185 *•
0.011 hrs-1 (R2 = 0.9949).  Equation 2
yields a calculated BODs value of 7.9 mg/L
for the refinery wastewater sample.  This
is commensurate with the expected effluent
BODs values of 2.4 to 7.7 mg/L since some
reduction in BOD will occur between the
sampling point and the effluent.

    The DO uptake rate for the lube oil
wastewater sample remained fairly constant
even though the absolute DO concentration
fell below one.  For the range evaluated,
both the zero-order and the first order in
BOD rate models were acceptable models in
                                          -123-

-------
describing the rate of oxygen consumption.
For the BOD rate model, the best BOD0
value was 18.53 mg/L, and the calculated
first order rate constant was k = 0.0111 ±
0.0005 hours'1 (R2 = 0.9969).  The BOD5 of
the lube oil wastewater sample calculated
using the above equation is 13.6 mg/L.
Again, this 1s commensurate with the
expected effluent BODs values of 8 to 12
mg/L since some reduction 1n BOD will
occur between the sampling point and the
effluent.  Since the BOD rate model is the
best model for both sets of data as seen
by the correlation coefficients, the low
concentrations of substrates are thought
to be responsible for the slow oxygen
uptake rates observed.

    Some of the results of the oxygen
uptake experiments for the Lagoon B sam-
ples at Site C are shown in Figure 3.  A
linear regression analysis was performed
on the data and the calculated slopes
provide the observed oxygen utilization
rates.  The DO uptake of the poisoned
Lagoon B samples were minimal; when a BOD-
type experimental sample was poisoned,
oxygen consumption ceased.  The oxygen
uptake rates observed in the DO depletion
experiments were slower than those ob-
served in the longer term BOD-type experi-
ments.  Also, there was a noticeable lag
phase in the BOD-type experimental oxygen
utilization curves.  These results are
predictable 1n light of the in situ DO
measurements.  The quick oxygen uptake
rate observed experimentally and the low
DO concentrations measured iji situ suggest
that the bacteria present in the pond
could utilize oxygen faster than it was
provided.  Consequently, the low DO con-
centration in the collected sample re-
quired much of the bacteria to acclimate
to the oxygen-rich conditions of the
experiments causing the lag phase and slow
Initial oxygen utilization rates.  Appar-
ently, the potential for aerobic biologi-
cal activity was significant in Lagoon B,
but its in situ importance was limited by
the slow aeration rate.

    The long-term average oxygen uptake
rates of the Lagoon B samples are very
similar.  The total amount of oxygen con-
sumed by the different samples was also
nearly Identical.  The total observed BOD
of the Lagoon B wastewater was 2,050 mg/L;
however, oxygen was still being consumed
when the experiment was terminated.
    The results of the oxygen uptake
experiments for the Lagoon C wastewater
sample were similar to those for Lagoon B.
Specifically, these results were:  the
poisoned sample showed minimal oxygen
utilization; the DO depletion experiment
revealed a slower initial oxygen utiliza-
tion rate than was observed with the
longer BOD-type study; and there was a
noticeable lag phase in the BOD-type
experimental oxygen utilization curve.

    The experimental results of Lagoon D
wastewater suggested that chemical  oxida-
tion, not biooxidation, was the most sig-
nificant oxygen utilization mechanism.
The oxygen depletion rate of the poisoned
and non-poisoned samples were identical.

    The high pH of Lagoon E wastewater is
prohibitive to biological growth.  As this
pond is upstream of Lagoon D, chemical
oxidation is again believed to be respon-
sible for its low iji situ DO concentra-
tion.

    For each bulk wastewater sample at
Site C, 700 mL of wastewater was placed in
a 1-L amber glass bottles with teflon-
lined screw caps.  Identical samples with
700 mg of mercuric acetate was also
examined.  The 1-L bottles were continu-
ously agitated and vented twice daily by
blowing air into the headspace for 30
seconds.  Relative component concentra-
tions were determined by GC using head-
space injections.  Analytical samples were
collected on Day 1, Day 3, and Day 8 of
the study. (3)

    The wind was flowing toward the east
at approximately 200 ft/min (8 mph) during
the sample collection at Site C.  The
sample taken from the west end of Lagoon B
was near the impoundment inlet and was
somewhat lower in concentration than the
southeast corner sample initially.

    Three major VO peaks were observed by
GC headspace analyses.  There was no sig-
nificant trend of the first peak (34 sec.)
area changes during the eight days of the
test for the sample taken from the west
end of the lagoon, but there were average
increases of 20 percent per day for the
first peak area from the sample taken from
the southeast corner.  These increases
were only observed in one sample and could
be due to experimental error.
                                          -124-

-------
    For the second peak (55 sec.) there
was no effect of biocide on the rate of
change of the peak area.  The sample taken
from the southeast corner of the lagoon
did not demonstrate a significant reduc-
tion in the 55 sec. peak area.   The 55
sec. peak of the sample from the west end
of the impoundment, however, declined 6
percent per day for both the sample of
wastewater with biocide and without the
biocide.

    For the sample taken from the west end
of the lagoon, the third peak (60 sec.)
increased in area at roughly the same rate
as the rate of decrease of the second peak
(in the same sample).  For the sample of
wastewater taken from the southeast
corner, there was no significant change in
concentration, with biocide or without
biocide, for either the second or third
peaks.

    Thus, no clear trends were observed
for the aerobic destruction of any of the
three major VO components in the headspace
of the Lagoon B wastewater samples.  The
average percent change of total headspace
VO  (total peak area) over the eight day
period with biocide present was zero, with
a standard deviation of approximately 10
percent of the concentration.  The average
change for the total headspace VO without
biocide was 18.3 percent, with a standard
deviation of approximately 10 percent.
These results suggest the possibility of a
small change in VO due to biological
activity over an eight day period that is
somewhat greater than the experimental
error.  Lagoon B would be expected to have
lower jji situ aerobic rates than measured
in  the laboratory, since it was primarily
anaerobic at the time of the sample col-
lection.

    For a typical mass transfer rate for
volatilization of 2  • 10~5 g mol/cm^-sec,
the time constant for a two meter deep
impoundment is approximately 6 days  (63%
volatilization loss).  This predicted
volatilization rate  is significantly
greater than the aerobic VO removal rates
measured in the Lagoon B samples (the
samples with the highest biological oxygen
consumption rates).  Lagoon B at Site C
did not have an aerobic zone more than a
few centimeters, additionally suggesting
that aerobic biodegradation does not com-
pete well with volatilization for VO re-
moval in at typical  surface impoundments.
Anaerobic Biological Activity Testing

    When, the iji situ DO measurements indi-
cated the presence of an anaerobic zone
(DO < 0.5 mg/L), a wastewater sample was
withdrawn from the bottom of the lagoon
and tested for anaerobic biological
activity as follows.  Nitrogen was first
bubbled through the five gallon sample to
purge any oxygen from the system that may
have been introduced at the time of sample
collection.  The lid, modified to accommo-
date a small tube, was secured, and the
tube was run to a water filled inverted
graduated cylinder.  Gas produced by the
system was thus collected by water dis-
placement, and the volume of gas produced
was measured.

    Figure 4 shows the cumulative volume
of gas produced by the anaerobic system
from Site A.  During the first month, only
35 mL of gas was collected.  After this
lag phase, the system exhibited an expo-
nential growth phase as gas was produced
quickly.  The growth phase was followed by
a saturated or steady state phase in which
gas production (assumed to be related to
metabolic activity) proceeded at a con-
stant rate.  In single population systems,
the saturated phase is typically followed
by a decline phase caused by substrate
limitation.  However, in this system,
another exponential growth phase followed
the saturated phase.  This is believed to
be caused by the old population shifting
to a new substrate or a new population
exhibiting growth on the decaying matter
of the old population.

    Since no anaerobic zones were found at
Site B with the jji situ DO measurements,
no anaerobic biological activity tests
were performed.

    Although the wastewater impoundments
at Site C are oxygen deficient, there was
little anaerobic gas generation in the
four wastewater samples tested from
Lagoons B, C, and D.  Some carbon dioxide
absorption was possible due to the high
pH.  The rates are reported in Table 1.

    Samples were withdrawn from the Site C
anaerobic test samples periodically for
chemical analysis.  These samples were
collected in duplicate in 40 mL VOA vials
and killed at the time of collection by
the addition of 1 mL of a 40 mg/mL mer-
                                          -125-

-------
curie acetate solution.  Analytical sam-
ples were collected at t=0, Day 8, Day 14,
and Day 55 of the study; these samples
were refrigerated until analyzed.  One set
of samples was analyzed by GC using head-
space injections (3).  The duplicate set
of samples was analyzed by GC using purge
and trap (3).  The results of the head-
space analyses on lagoon samples in the
anaerobic study show a dramatic increase
in total area counts for each lagoon sam-
ple after 55 days.  Sample D contained
more compounds and in greater quantities
than the other samples.

    The limited anaerobic biological acti-
vity of Site C wastewater samples does not
demonstrate removal of volatile organics
from the lagoon; however, in the waste-
water sample from the west end of Lagoon
B, a VO peak which corresponded to toluene
and one other VO peak showed major reduc-
tions with time.  There was a large
Increase in a VO peak which corresponded
to methanol with time.

CONCLUSIONS

1.  A sampling and analysis method is
    presented to evaluate the rate of
    biological activity in surface
    Impoundments.  The measured rates of
    biological and chemical VO removal can
    be compared to predicted air removal
    rates to determine the relative
    importance of competing VO removal
    pathways.

2.  Surface impoundment wastewater samples
    from al1 three wastewater treatment
    facilities demonstrated biological
    activity.  Microorganisms were ob-
    servable and oxygen utilization was
    measurable in each lagoon wastewater.

3.  The rate of oxygen consumption varied
    greatly from site to site, ranging
    from 0.1 to 35 mg/L-hr.  An unusually
    high rate of oxygen consumption, 38 to
    48 mg/L-hr, in one lagoon was attrib-
    uted to chemical processes rather than
    biological processes.

4.  Compound specific headspace of aerated
    samples from Site C indicated a half-
    life of approximately 8 days for one
    of the compounds.  Other compounds
    either did not change in concentration
    or exhibited an increase in concentra-
    tion.  Thus, the measured biological
    oxidation rates are less than the
    expected volatilization rates of VO
    from surface impoundments.

5.  The rate of anaerobic gas generation
    was slow in the lagoons which were
    anaerobic in the field.  Several  weeks
    were required before the anaerobic  gas
    generation began.  The compound
    specific analysis of VO indicated
    either no change in VO concentration
    or an increase in VO concentration  due
    to anaerobic processes.  Two VO  peaks
    showed major reductions in one waste-
    water sample.  These results suggest
    that anaerobic processes are not a
    significant pathway for VO removal  in
    impoundments.

REFERENCES

1.  Site A Visit Report, EPA No. 68-03-
    3253, Research Triangle Institute,
    August 26, 1986.

2.  Site B Visit Report, EPA No. 68-03-
    3253, Research Triangle Institute,
    August 27, 1986.

3.  Site C Visit Report, EPA No. 68-03-
    3253, Research Triangle Institute,
    September 23, 1986.
                                          -126-

-------
                    TABLE 1. , MEASURED  BIOLOGICAL RATES
Aerobic oxygen uptake rates (mg/L-hr)a
Sample
Site A
Site B
refinery
lube oil
Site C
Lagoon B, west
Lagoon B, SE
Lagoon C
Lagoon D
DO depletion
2.4 *

0.079 *
0.171 *

7.19 ±
..- 12.1 *
2.85 ±
38C *
0.2

0.009
0.014

0.37
0.45
0.07
5
BOD-type
1.57 * 0.10

NA
NA , .

34.9 ± 1.0
33.8 * 0.6
5.75 ± 0.34
47. 8C ± 1.1
Anaerobic
gas generation
(mL/L-hr)
0.022b

NA '
NA

9 • ID'5
2.3 • 10-3
2.6 • 10-3
1.2 • 10-3
aOxygen  uptake rates were  determined by using a least squares linear regres-
 sion on the data; the 95% confidence interval is also reported.
"Initial  rate was lower.
cNot biological uptake,  see text.
   8
   §
             FIGURE 1.   DISSOLVED OXYGEN  PROFILES
                         COMPARISON OF IN SITU 00 MEASUREMENTS
                         10      14      18     22     26     30     34

                             DEPTH FROM SURFACE (Inches)
                                   -127-

-------
ui

I

I
                   FIGURE  2.
      8.0
      7.0 -
      6.0 -
      5.0-
4.0 -
3.0 -
      2.0 -
      1.0-
      0.0 Hi1
           REGRESSION OUTPUT:
     y-Int — 0.204 mg/L
     •lop* — 0.171 mg/L— hr
       R2 - O.S882
         0            20



         D   REFINERY SAMPLE
                             DO UPTAKE  CURVE
                                SITES
REGRESSION OUTPUT;

y-fcrt. — 0.433 mg/L
slope — 0.079 mg/L— hr
  R2 - 0.9813
                             40

                              TIME (hrs)
                                                60            80
                                                                         100
                                            <•   LUBE OIL SAMPLE
                   FIGURE  3.   DO UPTAKE  CURVE
                            STIE d LAGOON B (SE CORNER)
                                              REGRESSION OUTPUT:
                                              y—hit •• —0.082 mg/L
                                              a!op« — 12.1 mg/L-hr
                                                R2 - 0.9946
                                                  REGRESSION OUTPUT:
                                                  y—Int. •• 0.036 mg/L
                                                  •lop* —
                                                    R2 - 0.9955
                    RUN 1
                              TIME (mln)
                            +   RUN 2
                                                   A   KILLED
                                   -128-

-------
I
         FIGURE 4.  ANAEROBIC GAS PRODUCTION
                       SITE A: BOTTOM SAMPLE
                               80     100     120     140
                                                       160
                           TIME (doya)  ,
                          -129-

-------
                           COMPOSITION OF LEACHATES FROM ACTUAL
                                  HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES*

                     Glenn D. McNabb, James R. Payne, Paul C. Harkins
                      Science Applications International Corporation
                                   San Diego, CA  92038

                          William D. Ellis, Jennifer A. Bramlett
                      Science Applications International Corporation
                                     McLean, VA  22102

                                         ABSTRACT

    This presentation addresses the analytical methodology used in a follow-on effort of a
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sponsored project.  The project was initially
undertaken to gather data on the composition of hazardous waste leachates and to support
the development of multi-component synthetic leachate.  These synthetic leachates will be
used to evaluate the effectiveness of various liner materials used in landfills and other
hazardous waste storage, treatment, and disposal facilities.  As such, the formulated
leachates should be representative of typical compositions of actual hazardous waste site
leachates.  During the initial study, the routine organic analyses of thirteen leachates
accounted for only approximately four percent of the overall Total Organic Carbon (TOG).
As a result, a more rigorous and complex analytical method was developed and is presently
being employed in the follow-on study to obtain a more comprehensive characterization.
During the first phase of this study, a hazardous waste leachate sample was characterized
by the new analytical procedure with the intent of maximizing the percent of TOC
accountable by specific compounds or by functional groups.  Overall, approximately 48% of
the TOC was accounted for by the new method.  This included approximately 20% attributed
to individual components and 28% accounted for by functional groups.  In order to obtain
more information on the actual composition of hazardous waste leachate, a second phase of
this study is employing the same new analytical method to characterize two additional
leachate samples.  Based on the results of these more thorough characterizations,
recommendations will be made regarding the composition of representative synthetic
leachates for linear compatibility testing.
INTRODUCTION

    A data base containing information on
hazardous wastes and their associated
leachate compositions is being developed by
the Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory (HWERL) of the U.S. EPA Land
Pollution Control Division.  The data base
will be used to develop a multi-component,
synthetic hazardous waste leachate.  The
formulated leachate will be used to test
the integrity of containment liners under
consideration for use in landfills and
other hazardous waste storage, treatment,
and disposal facilities.
 *The work reported herein was performed by Science Applications  International Corporation
 under U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency Contract No.  68-01-7043, Work Assignment No.
 P-28.  The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies
 of the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency nor does mention of  trade names, commercial
 products,  or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
                                           -130-

-------
    In a previous study  (1), thirteen
hazardous waste disposal site leachates
were analyzed for priority pollutant
metals, organic compounds, total cyanide,
total organic carbon, chemical oxygen
demand, and a variety of other general
parameters.  The authors completely charac-
terized the leachates for metal concentra-
tions; however, the overall sum of identi-
fied organic constituents averaged to only
about four percent of the sample TOG.
Because liner compatibility tests have
shown that heavy metals in saturated
solutions are generally compatible with
flexible membrane liners, the focus of this
follow- on study has been to more
thoroughly characterize the unidentified
portion of the TOG.

    Therefore, in order to maximize the
accountable organic carbon, the first phase
of this study was devoted to the develop-
ment of a more rigorous analytical proce-
dure, which would identify organic contri-
bution by functional group classes or by
individual compounds when possible.  The
method was evaluated by using it to charac-
terize a leachate sample, and the results
presented here indicate that the procedure
is capable of a more complete organic
characterization of hazardous waste site
leachates.  Additional insight into the
actual organic composition of waste site
leachates is the objective of the second
phase of study, which will also allow for
minor modifications to the method through
the analysis of two different leachate
samples.  This paper describes the analy-
tical methodology, results of the first
phase analysis, recommendations for
modifications to the procedure, and
suggestions for areas of further study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

    The analytical scheme that was deve-
loped is outlined in Figure 1.   The
procedure was designed to not only charac-
terize organic priority pollutants,  but
also to identify polar compounds not usual-
ly analyzed in standard, procedures.   In
addition,  the method allowed for the char-
acterization of higher molecular weight
compounds through the identification of
functional groups.  Total organic carbon
(TOG) measurements were made at various
critical steps in order to track the orga-
nic carbon mass which thereby allowed for
an assignment of the TOG by functional
group.

   , As seen in the figure, Initial charac-
terization included total organic halides
(TOX) , total nitrogen, sulfate, sulfide,
pH, conductivity, and methylene blue active
substances (MBAS) as well as TOG.  In addi-
tion to the more routine analyses, MBAS
analysis allowed for an estimation of the
percent TOG due to anionic surfactants or
detergents which may not be chromatograph-
able.

    The next step (B) identified and
quantified individual volatile compounds
through gas chromatography/mass spectro-
scopy (GC/MS) purge and trap techniques.
The purged sample was then subjected to a
molecular weight fractionation using gel
filtration chromatography (GFC).  The >500
molecular, weight -(MW) fraction was analyzed
for TOG, TOX, and MBAS for mass balance of
those parameters and by UV^visible, and
infrared spectroscopy and   C-NMR for func-
tional group characterizations.  After TOG
and MBAS analysis, the <500 MW was extrac-
ted (neutral and basic) followed by silica
gel chromatography of the extract into
aliphatic, aromatic, and polar fractions,
with subsequent GC/MS analysis.  The
aqueous remainder was re-analyzed for TOG,
then extracted after acidification.  After
GC/MS analysis the extract was subjected to
derivitization with diazomethane followed
by reanalysis in o.rder to verify compound
identities.  The aqueous remainder after
acidic extraction was analyzed by high
pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and
aqueous compatible capillary column GC/MS
and, finally, TOG.

    A brief description of each step shown
in Figure 1 follows.  The figure also lists
the QA/QC measures taken at each of the
steps including replicates,  field blanks,
spike and recovery,  and method blanks.

Step A  Raw leachate was obtained from a
hazardous waste site in New Jersey and sub-
mitted to SAIC with a field blank of
distilled water.   The collection of the
                                           -131-

-------
                                    LEACHATE(500MLS)
                                    TOC, TOX, N (TOTAL),
                                       S, pH, EC, MBAS
El
       SiOa
 CHROMATOGRAPHY
F11   F21    F3 I
                         ORGANIC
    GC/MS
       GC/MS
                 GC/MS
                                     PURGE FOR GC/MS
                                           VOA
                                           GFC
                                                      > 500 MW
                                              < 500 wiw

                                             I
BASE/NEUTRAL
 EXTRACTION
                                               AQUEOUS
                                            TOC
                                                                TOC, TOX,      I  Ci
                                                               UV-VIS, MBAS    I
                                                                         LYOPHILIZE
                                                                                   C2
                                                           ORGANIC
                                      ACID EXTRACTION
                                               AQUEOUS
                                         TOC, HPLC,
                                       AQUEOUS GC/MS
                                                                      GC/MS  I G1
                                                                       DERIVATIZE
                                                                       W|TH CH2 N2
                                                                   GC/MS
                                                                            G2
                     QA ANALYSES:
                          REPLICATES AT STEPS A, B, C1, D
                          FIELD/METHOD BLANKS AT A, B, C1, D, El, E2, F, G2, H
                          SPIKED BLANKS AT STEPS E, E1, E2, G, G1
                           Figure 1.  Diagram of phase II analytical steps.
                                            -132-

-------
 field blank consisted of opening the appro-
 priate sample container (filled with
 distilled- water) for the duration of the
 leachate  sampling.  Aliquots of the leach-
 ate and field blank were taken for TOG,
 TOX, total nitrogen, sulfate, MBAS, sul-
 fide, pH  and conductivity  (EC).

    TOG measurements were  made using an
 O.I. Corporation Model 700 TOC analyzer,.
 and followed the US EPA 600/4-79-020 Method
 160.4(4).  TOX was measured on a Xertex/
 Dohrmann  DX-20 analyzer, following the US
 EPA Method 9020.  All the  other analyses
 were done following procedures outlined in
 Standard  Methods for the Examination of
 Water and Wastewater (5) and the particular
 methods for each analyte are as follows:
 nitrogen  by method 420A; sulfate by method
 426D; MBAS by method 512B; sulfide by
 method 427; EC by method 205; and pH by
 method 423, using an Altex 4500 pH meter
 with an Orion 8104 probe.

 Step B  A 5 ml aliquot of  the raw leachate
 was analyzed by GC/MS for  volatile organic
 compound  characterization  according to EPA
 Test Method 624.

    The remaining leachate was purged with
 Ultra pure nitrogen for 24 hours at a rate
 of approximately 100 mis N./minute.  An
 aliquot was analyzed by GC/MS to assure
 total removal of volatile  organic
 compounds.  A 500 ml aliquot of the purged
 leachate was used in Step  C.

 Step C  The molecular weight fractionation
 step presented here was completed using gel
 filtration chromatography  techniques.   In
 order to calibrate the GFC separations,  one
 column (20 mm x 300 mm with a 250 ml reser-
voir) was static-packed to the 300 mm mark
with Sephadex®G-10-120,  which has an
 average pore exclusion size of 700 daltons.
 The water exclusion volume was calculated
 (3) to be 31 ml and,  after a 10 ml applica-
 tion of the leachate, this quantity was
 collected and discarded.   Next,  10 ml frac-
 tions were eluted and collected for three
bed volumes.   Three additional bed volumes
were taken in 15 ml fractions,  for a total
 of fifteen fractions.  These fractions were
extracted and analyzed by GC/MS for deter-
mination of molecular weight.
     The  results  obtained were plotted as
molecular weight versus  volume  eluted in
mis.   The relation was linear,  and indica-
ted  that all  compounds of molecular weight
greater  than  500 were eluted in the first
34 ml  (very close  to the calculated vol-
ume) .  All compounds were eluted in 142 ml.

Steps  Cl, C2, &  D  Aliquots  of  the MW >500
fraction were analyzed for TOC  and TOX, in
duplicate, with  accompanying field blanks.
Aliquots of the  <500 MW  fraction were
analyzed for  TOC only.   The  analytical
scheme calls  for MBAS analysis  of Steps Cl
and  D; however,  because  no MBAS were  detec-
ted  during Step  A, further MBAS analyses
were "eliminated.

     The  >500  MW  fraction was also scanned
on a Hitachi  100-80 UV/VIS spectrophoto-
meter  (with recorder) from 800  nm to  190
nm.  The scan was  conducted  with the  field
blank  in the  reference cell  using matching
quartz cuvettes.

    Lyophilization of this fraction (to
remove water) was  accomplished  by placing
approximately 75 mis of  sample  at a time in
a 500  ml round bottom flask  fitted with a
ground glass  adapter.  Vacuum tubing  con-
nected the flask and adapter to a trap
which  was placed in a dewar  containing
liquid nitrogen.   A vacuum was  applied to
the  system using a Welch Duo-Seal®vacuum
pump.  Ice was removed from  the trap
periodically  and discarded.  The  complete
contents of the  fraction were lyophilized
in this  fashion  and the  resulting solid was
quantitatively recovered.

    Upon completion of the lyophilization,
a small  quantity of the  solid was  pressed
into a potassium bromide (KBr)  pellet, and
subjected to  infrared spectrophotometry
using  a  Perkin-Elmer Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectrophotometer connected  to a
Perkin-Elmer  7300  Series computer.  Scans
were from 4000 cm   to 600 cm   and refer-
enced  against..air.   The solid was' also
subjected to   C NMR, using a GE 300 series
model.   The sample was dissolved in D-0,
spiked with dioxane (as an internal stan-
dard) and run at a 45 degree pulse  to allow
for relaxation.
                                           -133-

-------
Steps E. El. E2 and G  The <500 MW fraction
was spiked with Base/Neutral/Acid surrogate
standards to a final concentration of 200
ng//Jl.  The fraction was then extracted
With methylene chloride at pH 7, pH 12 and
pH 1.  A small aliquot was taken for TOC
analysis before acid extraction (Step F).
The base and neutral extracts of the spiked
leachate were combined.  The combined
extract was volume reduced in a
concentrator tube to -1 ml then exchanged
Into hexane.  The reduced extract was then
subjected to silica gel chromatography,
using a column of 10 mm i.d. x 240 mm with
A 200 ml reservoir.  Three fractions were
collected (aliphatic, aromatic, and polar)
corresponding to elution by 1) 50 mis of
pentane, 2) 200 mis of 1:1 pentane; methy-
lene chloride and 3) 50 mis of methylene
chloride.   Each fraction's volume was
reduced and then analyzed by GC/MS.

Steps Gl and G2  The acid extract was also
volume  reduced and screened by GC/MS for
compound identification and quantification.
After initial screening and compound
Identification, the extract was derivatized
with dlazomethane.

     This derivitization converts carboxylic
acids to esters and alcohols  to ethers.
Diazomethane for the reaction was produced
according  to the method of H.M. Fales,  T.M.
Jaouni  and J.F. Babashak  (2).   This method
 is of considerably lower hazard than most
 conventional methods,  while producing  CH2N2
 In good yield.  Once  derivatized  the  sample
 extract was reanalyzed by GC/MS for
 compound-specific  identification confirma-
 tion.

 Step H  After acid extraction the aqueous
 remainder was aliquoted for TOC,  HPLC and
 aqueous GC/MS techniques.   Aqueous GC/MS
 analysis was conducted using a J&W Scienti-
 fic Carbowax Fused Silica capillary column.
 HPLC was done using a Waters Associates
 Model 244 LC with a R401 Refractive Index
 Detector.  This particular model does not
 run gradients in the mobile phase; there-
 fore, runs were done with 100% methanol;
 75% methanol and 25% H-0; 50% methanol and
 50% H00; 25% methanol and 75% H20; and 100%
 H.O.-  All runs utilized a C-18 reverse
 pnase column.
   RESULTS AND  DISCUSSIONS

       The analytical  approach described  above
   was applied  to  a waste  site leachate sample
   with the  initial (Step  A)  characteristics
   shown In  Table  1.   As seen, this  sample has
   elevated  TOG and conductivity and a
   depressed pH, moderate  to  high levels  of
   nitrogen, sulfate and TOX,  and undetected
   levels of sulfide and MBAS.

       GC/MS purge and trap analysis for  vola-
   tile organic constituents  identified 18
   compounds mostly present in the low part-
   per-billion (ppb) range.  The most abundant
   volatile  compounds were toluene at 143 ppb
   and vinyl acetate at 114 ppb.  The remai-
   ning compounds  included ketone solvents,
   chlorinated solvents, aromatic and ali-
   phatic hydrocarbons and alcohols in the  low

   Table 1.   INITIAL LEACHATE CHARACTERIZATION
             (STEP A)
   Analyte
                     Units
Field   Sample
Blank   Average
Nitrogen (total)
Sulfate
Sulfide
MBAS
pH
Conductivity
TOC
TOX
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1

umhos/cm
mg/1
mg Cl/1
<10
<3
<10
<0.1
6.9
10
<3
0.07
635
210
<10
<0.1
4.3
19,500
16,000
166
   (<50) ppb range.  The total level of vola-
   tile organic carbon (374 /tg/1) represents
   <0.01% of the initial sample TOC.

       Figure 2 tracks the TOC distribution by
   weight percent according to the analytical
   steps employed.  As seen, the molecular
   weight fractionation step by gel filtration
   chromatography resulted in the loss of 29%
   of the TOC due to adsorption or reactions
   with the Sephadex®gel.  The remaining TOC
   was almost evenly distributed between the
   less than and greater than 51j>g molecular
   weight fractions.  Based on   C-NMR and
   proton NMR, the  39% TOC observed in the
   greater than 500 MW fraction was determined
   to be comprised  primarily of aromatic
   hydrocarbons.  This data was in good agree-
   ment with fourier transfer infra-red (FTIR)
-134-

-------
                      100%  I INITIAL
VOLATILES
100%  I NON-VOLATILES
                                                      29%
                             (ADSORBED TO
                             SEPHADEX®
                                                           J
                                           32%   I < 500 MW
                B/N
                EXTRACTABLES
                           AQUEOUS
                           REMAINDER
                          ACID
                          EXTRACTABLES
          3.0%
30%
AQUEOUS
REMAINDER
                   Figure 2. TOC distribution flow scheme by percentage.
                                    -135-

-------
spectroscopic analysis which showed only an
OH absorbance and aromatic overtone reso-
nances.  In addition, this higher molecular
weight fraction contained nearly 20% of the
original TOX.

    The results of base/neutral extraction
of the <500 MW fraction with subsequent
silica gel chromatography indicate that the
aliphatic fraction (Fl) consisted solely of
low level n-alkane concentrations.  The
aromatic fraction (F2) had only three com-
pounds present, two  of which were not
identifiable by GC/MS.  The highest levels
of base/neutral extractable carbon were
present in the polar fraction  (F3) with
phenol exhibiting the highest  concen-
trations.  The total contribution to the
TOG resulting from base/neutral extractable
compound level is approximately 1.0%.

    Another  3.0% of  the initial TOG was
accounted for during acid extraction.  The
largest contribution is due to benzoic acid
and phenol, with pentanoic and hexanoic
acids  also present in substantial concen-
trations.  Subsequent diaxomethane derivi-
tization was used primarily for compound
identification confirmation.

    The remaining aqueous phase after both
GFC and base/neutral and acid  extraction
was found to retain  30 percent of the
original TOG.  The composition of this
"remainder"  fraction was determined by
aqueous GC/MS, and was found to be composed
primarily of benzoic acid with some phenol
as well.  The benzoic acid concentration
was exceedingly high in this fraction, and
this  individual compound alone accounts  for
17% of the entire initial TOG  value.  Table
2 shows .the  other major individual com-
pounds contributing  to the TOG.  As seen,
over  20% of  the leachate TOG can be
attributed to benzoic acid and phenol.
 TABLE 2.   TOG CLASSIFICATION BY MAJOR
           INDIVIDUAL COMPOUNDS
 Compounds
% of Original TOG
Benzoic Acid
Phenol
Pentanoic Acid
Hexanoic Acid
Trimethyl-1, 3-pentanediol
17.
3.1
.07
.06
.08
    Table 3 presents the leachate composi-
tion as a function of organic function-
ality, with representative compounds and
their contribution.  These six general
organic functional classes are often used
to assess the compatibility of organic
compounds with various contaminant liners.
The largest contribution was from aromatic
hydrocarbons of molecular weights greater
than 500.  The only other class of com-
pounds to contribute substantially to the
TOC was organic acids, with benzoic acid
responsible for the vast majority of the
TOC.  All the other classes were respon-
sible for less than 1% of the overall TOG,
with organic bases not contributing at all.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    The  results of the waste site leachate
characterization by the analytical
procedure  developed and utilized during
this  study provide the basis for the
following  conclusions:

•  The  method accounted  for approximately
    48%  of the organic carbon present.

•  The  major constituents  are  organic
    acids  (20%) and aromatic hydrocarbons
     (26%).   The organic acid group  consists
    primarily of  benzoic  acid.  The  aromatic
    hydrocarbon contribution is attributed
     to high (>500) molecular weight
     aromatic compounds.

 •   The  procedure allows  for a more tho-
     rough characterization of the sample by
     providing steps to  ensure the recovery
     of highly water soluble,  polar
     compounds.  Standard separatory funnel
     solvent extraction methods  were capable
     of recovering only a small fraction
     (13%)  of the  total  mass of benzoic acid
     present.  Therefore the procedure calls
     for aqueous GC/MS,  and HPLC steps,
     which were used successfully to
     quantify the  organic acid contribution.

 •   Reactions with and/or adsorption to the
     Sephadex®gel  during GFC resulted in
     the loss of 29% of the sample TOC.

     Based on the conclusions above, recom-
 mendations for further studies would
 include 1) the optimization of the molecu-
 lar weight separation step and 2) a more
 detailed investigation into the composition
 of the >500 molecular weight fraction.
                                           -136-

-------
                    TABLE  3.  ORGANIC CONTENT BY CHEMICAL CLASSIFICATION
 Chemical Classification
                                   Percent  (WT)
                 Representative Compounds
 Organic Acids





 Oxygenated Hydrocarbons



 Halogenated Hydrocarbons


 Organic Bases

 Aromatic Hydrocarbons



 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
20,3
 0.08



 0.86


 0.0

26.8



 0.002
Benzoic Acid  (17.1%)
Phenol ,(3.1%)
Alkanoic Acids  (0.13%)
Substituted Benzoic Acids  (0.01%)
Substituted Phenols (0.002%)

Ketone Solvents (0.0003%)
Alcohols (0.0002%)
Trimethylpentanediol (0.08%)

TOX (0.86%)
Chlorinated Solvents (0.001%)

 None detected

Aromatic Compounds >500 MW (26.8%)
Benzene and Alkyl-substituted
benzenes (0.001%)

n-alkanes (0.002%)
     Because the molecular weight separation
 step was directly responsible for the loss
 of 29% of the TOG, this procedure should be
 modified to affect a clean separation while
 minimizing the loss of organic carbon.   In
 addition to testing other available gel
 chromatography materials,  efforts should be
 directed towards resources (such as frac-
 tional vacuum distillation)  that might
 circumvent organic carbon losses.   With
 that additional organic carbon available
 for characterization,  accountable TOG may
 exceed 80% (based on the loss experienced
 using Sephadex®gel for molecular weight
 separation).

     The molecular weight separation step is
 important  because it can effectively
 isolate a  large  portion of the  organic
 carbon that normally would not  be  accounted
 for.   Of the  six chemical  classifications,
 the >500 molecular weight  fraction of
 aromatic hydrocarbons  exhibited the highest
 percentage of organic  carbon  (26.8%).
 Because  this fraction  represents a
 substantial portion of the overall organic
 carbon and because synthetic leachate
 formulations should include representative
 constituents from  this fraction, additional
 studies should focus on the specific
chemical composition of the >500 MW
fraction.
              Once a more  efficient molecular weight
          separation step  has  been devised we recom-
          mend that a statistically sufficient number
          of representative  leachate samples  be
          subjected to the procedure.  A comprehen-
          sive data base,  containing the fully
          characterized organic portion  of actual
          waste-site leachates, will greatly  facili-
          tate the formulation of  a synthetic
          leachate.   This  approach,  in combination
          with the newly developed analytical method,
          will ensure that containment liner  compati-
          bility tests  are conducted with  a realistic
          and  accurate  representation of actual waste
          site  leachates.
                                          -137-

-------
                                        REFERENCES
1.  Bramlett,  J.A.,  Repa,  E.W.,  and Mashni, C.I., 1986.  Leachate Characterization and
    Synthetic Leachate Formulation for Liner Testing.  Proceedings to the Seventh National
    Conference on the Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites.

2.  Fales, H.M., Jaouni, T.M., Babashak, J.F., 1973.  Simple device for preparing ethereal
    diazomethane  without resorting to codistillation.  Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 45, No.
    14.

3.  Kremmer and Boros, 1979.  Gel Chromatography.  J. Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.

4.  United  States  Environmental  Protection  Agency, 1986.  Test Methods 415.1, 624, and
    9020.  Federal Register Vol. 51. No. 125.

5.  Standard  Methods  for  the  Examination  of Water and Wastewater, 1985.   Test Methods
    420A, 426D, 512B, 427, 205 and 423.  16th Edition.
                                            -138-

-------
  DECONTAMINATION TECHNIQUES  FOR MOBILE P^PONSE EQUIPMENT USED AT WASTE SITES


                               Mary K. Stinson
                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                           Releases Control Branch
                              Edison, NJ  08837

                                  Gary Kepko
                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                  Region VII
                               25 Funston Road
                             Kansas City, KS  66115
                                   ABSTRACT
     Any cleanup equipment used at waste sites must be decdntaminated after
use.  This paper highlights a published EPA report on the state-of-the-art
review of decontamination techniques for cleanup equipment and discusses
field experience with decontaminating equipment presently in use.

     For those who prepare decontamination plans for cleanup equipment at
hazardous sites, the EPA report provides background material on decontamin-
ation methods, contamination assessment, and contamination avoidance.  The
EPA report particularly stresses the importance of contamination avoidance.
Such measures as use of enclosures for equipment, safety features on equip-
ment to prevent spills and leaks, and protective coatings on equipment sur-
faces reduce hazard, time, and cost of the final decontamination task.

     Though chemical methods are being developed to degrade contaminants on
equipment surfaces, use of physical removal  methods prevails in the field.
This will be shown in discussing decontamination procedures of equipment
presently in use, such as the EPA Mobile Incineration System operating at
the Denney Farm Site, Missouri, on dioxin-contaminated oils, sludges, and
soils.
                                    -139-

-------
INTRODUCTION

Any equipment used at a waste site
must be decontaminated prior to its
removal from the site.  This paper
highlights a published EPA state-of-
the-art review entitled "Decontamina-
tion Techniques for Mobile Response
Equipment Used at Waste Sites," and
discusses field practices with decon-
taminating equipment presently in use
at dioxin-contaminated sites in EPA
Region VII.  Personnel protective
clothing and equipment and decontam-
ination of personnel is not a subject
of this paper, though mention of it
is made where appropriate.  Decontam-
ination is a separate field activity
with full-time personnel assigned to
it.  Like any other field operation
at a site, decontamination must be
planned for, executed in the field,
and tested for its effectiveness.  A
decontamination plan constitutes a
separate section  of any operating per-
mit or any other  workplan pertaining
to the site activities.  The decontam-
ination plan for  the EPA Mobile  Incin-
eration System operating at the  Denney
Farm Site in Missouri is an example of
such a plan.

The EPA report  is particularly useful
to those who are  new to the  responsi-
bility for  equipment  decontamination,
either in the  planning  stage or  in
the field.   For example, the report
should be useful  to  those who  develop
and design  new treatment  systems for
use  at waste sites and  to those  who
introduce existing systems  to  process
hazardous waste.   The report gives
 background  material  on  decontamina-
tion methods,  contamination assess-
ment,  and  contamination avoidance.

 Decontamination methods for large and
 expensive  components of mobile re-
sponse equipment should be non-destruc-
tive to the equipment itself, but ef-
fective in removing contaminants from
interior and exterior surfaces of the
equipment.  Small items may be sacri-
ficed and/or disposed of.  Determina-
tion of an acceptable level of contam-
ination is essential.  Development and
testing of decontamination methods may
be necessary prior to taking equipment
to the field. Contamination assessment
ment is done with chemical and physi-
cal test(s) that are able to test down
to the determined acceptable level of
contaminants on equipment.  Some test
methods may need to be developed.

The report stresses the importance of
contamination avoidance because, if
appropriate measures are taken, both
the decontamination and the contamin-
ation assessment can be much reduced
and simplified.

Field decontamination practices  pre-
sented here are those of  EPA Region
VII.  EPA  Region VII has  gained  con-
siderable  experience with  decontamin-
ation of various equipment used  at
many dioxin-contaminated  sites  in
Missouri.  Decontamination has  been
performed  at  all levels of site  activ-
ities such as field  investigation,
excavation and  removal of contaminated
materials, and  ultimate disposal  and
deli sting  of  residues with the  use of
the  EPA Mobile  Incineration  System at
the  Denney Farm Site, Missouri.   Reg-
 ion  VII practices  contamination avoid-
 ance.  The amount  of equipment  that
would  require decontamination  is kept
 to a minimum.  They  accomplish  it by
 using  disposable equipment and  by
 wrapping  reusable  equipment  with
 disposable coverings.   For equipment
 that cannot  be  protected, Region VII
 has  developed a rigorous  decontamina-
 tion procedure.  Equipment decontamin-
                                      -140-

-------
 inated  with  this  procedure  is  then
 wipe-sampled and  released only when
 analysis  of  wipe  samples show  non-
 detectable levels  of dioxin.
 IMPORTANCE  OF  CONTAMINATION AVOIDANCE

 Contamination  avoidance is an  important
 consideration  of  any planned or ongoing
 activity at  a  waste site because it
 reduces hazard, time, and cost of the
 final decontamination task.  The report
 discusses such measures as use of en-
 closed structures and secondary con-
 tainment for the mobile response units,
 equipment safety  features, and protec-
 tive coatings  for mobile response equip-
 ment.  Region  VII has developed a num-
 ber of practical ways to minimize con-
 tamination in  all of their activities
 at dioxin-contaminated sites.  Contam-
 ination avoidance has been carefully
 considered for the EPA incinerator at
 Denney Farm.

 Enclosures for Equipment

 A combined use of an overhead struc-
 ture with a secondary containment is
 an effective measure to minimize
transport of hazardous materials dur-
 ing operation of the mobile response
 equipment and to facilitate the decon-
tamination task.  An example would be
 a "Butler" steel building attached to
a concrete slab.

Housing of equipment by an overhead
structure is not always required,  but
it minimizes air transport of contam-
inants during its operation.   A var-
iety of commercial temporary or semi-
permanent structures are available at
a cost of $30-$400 per square meter
as shown in Table 1.
     Table 1.Overhead  Temporary
  	Structures	
                          Cost  Per
   Structure Type        Square  Meter

   Air Inflatable   	 $ 30 - $100
   Steel  Arch  	 $100 - $200
   Fabric Supported
     by Arch	 $200 - $400
   Prefabricated Steel
     ("Butler")	 $ 80 - $100
Secondary containment to catch spills,
leaks, or wash solution from the de-
contamination operation is always
required.   It can be applied either
under the entire operating unit or at
points of the unit where leaks or
spills are most likely.  A simple and
effective secondary containment can
be a sloped, combed concrete slab,
coated with a polymeric material  and
with a collection sump.  It can also
provide structural support for the
operating system.  Another simple and
commonly used secondary containment
is a polymeric fabric cover, such as
polyurethane or polyethylene.

Safety Features

Safety features on equipment to pre-
vent spills and leaks is another means
to prevent contamination of equipment
surfaces.  Most important here is the
design of the equipment itself to have
few potential  sources of fugitive
emissions.  The next step is to exam-
ine system components,  identify those
that may break during operation,  and
either change or reinforce them.
Failures typically occur in seals and
fittings used in such components  as
pumps, valves, and piping systems.
See Table 2.
                                     -141-

-------
            Table  2.  Equipment Components Using Seals and Fittings
    Component
  Pumps

  In-line Valve
  Open-ended Valve

  Piping System
Point of Potential  Failure
Drive shaft seals

Stem and bonnet
Stem, bonnet, and flow seal

Flanges, elbows, and tees
Protective Coatings

Protective coatings of paint or poly-
meric materials, either permanent or
temporary, can provide a barrier be-
tween equipment surfaces and contamin-
ants.  For mobile equipment, those that
                                                            Comment
Use seal less pumps

Use bellows-sealed valves
and diaphragm valves

Minimize sharp elbows.  Use
high-temperature/high-pres-
sure seals.  Use stainless
steel or Inconel pipes.
                     are promising are temporary coatings
                     that can be peeled off and disposed of
                     by incineration, for example.  For
                     small areas protective tapes can be
                     used.  Protective coatings on response
                     equipment, except for tapes, are not
                     used at waste sites.  See Table 3.
Table 3. Protective Coatings for External Equipment Surfaces
Coatings
Permanent
(Epoxy resins)
Temporary
(Poly vinyl
Chloride)
Quantity of
Waste Produced
Moderate
Moderate
to Large
Cost
Moderate
Moderate
to Large
Danger to
Operator
Low
Low to
Moderate
Comment
Not suitable for
mobile equipment
Two or More
Coatings Needed
 Contamination Avoidance at Region  VII

 Region VII's approach to contamination
 avoidance on dioxin-sites is to use
 disposable equipment and wrapping
 equipment with disposable coverings.
 Among disposable equipment is most of
                      the personnel protective gear and
                      equipment such as Tyvek® suits, spent
                      cartridges from respirators, occasion-
                      ally boot covers, and inner and outer
                      gloves.  These items are discarded
                      whenever they are removed at lunch
                      breaks or at the end of the day.
                                      -142-

-------
 Other disposable equipment are sampl-
 ing spoons, sample trays, and survey
 flags.  Disposing of small sampling
 equipment reduces chances for cross-
 contamination of samples* which is
 another benefit.  Disposable plastic
 covers are used to protect surfaces
 of reusable items.  The exterior of
 sample jars is kept free of contamin-
 ation with this method.  Prior to
 sample collection, the jar is placed
 into a plastic bag with the opening
 sealed around the top of the jar with
 a rubber band.  After filling the jar
 with the sample, the bag is pulled
 off and discarded.  Disposable cover-
 ings are also used to protect large
 containers, so called roll-off boxes,
 for transporting bulk excavated soil
 from other sites to the site where
 the incinerator operates.   The boxes
 are first  triple lined  with polyethy-
 lene sheeting.   After filling with
 soil,  the  sheeting is sealed  and
 boxes  are  topped for transport.   At
 the feed storage building,  the back
 of  the boxes  are opened, the  boxes
 are tipped, and the  plastic wrapped
 soil package  slides  out  of  the box
 into the storage building.  The in-
 terior and  exterior  of  the  roll-off
 boxes  remains  free  from contamination
 and  does not  require  decontaminating.
 Also,  the  exterior of the wrapped
 soil package  is  free  from contamina-
 tion.   Of course,  discarded items and
 coverings  add to  the  bulk of  hazard-
 ous waste.  Availability of the incin-
 erator  as at the  Denney Farm makes it
 possible to dispose of this waste by
 incineration.  The contamination
 avoidance for the EPA incinerator at
 Denney Farm is achieved by situating
main components of the system in the
clean zone. Only the material storage
building for loose soil and the build-
ing housing the shredder and waste
oil  tank are situated in the contamin-
ated zone.  A completely enclosed con-
veyor brings the shredded feed to the
completely enclosed loading area of
 the incinerator, which is located in
 the clean zone.  The incinerator is
 also housed in a building, though the
 primary reason for constructing this
 building was weather protection of
 the system and comfort of operating
 personnel.

 Pre-cleaning of Equipment Before and
 After Travel

 Another helpful  technique to prevent
 buildup of contaminants on equipment
 surfaces is to clean the equipment
 prior to its transport from the home
 base to the site and upon arrival  at
 the waste  site.   The entire incinera-
 tion system was  steam-cleaned within
 three days  before leaving its home
 base in Edison,  New  Jersey, to  remove
 oil  and dirt,  and this operation was
 repeated upon  arrival  at  Denney Farm
 to  remove  accumulated  road  dirt.

 DECONTAMINATION  PROCEDURES

 Decontamination  procedure by a  single
 method  or a  sequence of methods re-
 moves or detoxifies  the  residual con-
 taminants from the internal and exter-
 nal  surfaces of the  equipment.  The
 decontamination procedure has to be
 designed for the  particular hazardous
 substance(s) to be treated, and also
 tested  on equipment prior to its use
 in the  field.  Any decontamination is
 usually  time consuming and labor in-
 tensive.  Region  VII designed and
 tested  a decontamination  sequence for
 the dioxin-contaminated equipment.

 The  report divides decontamination pro-
 cedures into three categories:   solu-
 bilization methods, which use solvents
 to solubilize and wash off contamin-
 ants, chemical degradation methods
 which chemically degrade contaminants
 at the surface, and mechanical  methods,
which mechanically detach contaminants
from the surface with abrasive  and non-
abrasive methods.
                                    -143-

-------
Solubillzation Methods

For the mobile field equipment, solu-
bilization methods are primarily used
because they are available, effective,
non-destructive, and suitable for both
internal and external surfaces.  These
methods use water or steam, with or
without detergents, organic solvents,
and foams, gels, and pastes.   Use of
foams, gels, and pastes may give better
coverage of. equipment surfaces than  a
thin organic solvent.  Application of
wash solutions is usually by immersion
or spray.  The disadvantage of these
methods is that they generate waste,
usually liquid, that contains the
removed contaminant.  See Table 4.
Table 4. Decontamination of Surfaces by Solubilization Methods
Method
Water
Steam
Organic
Solvents
Foams
Gels and
Pastes
Quantity of
Waste Produced
Large
Small
Moderate
Small
Small
Cost
Low
Moderate
Moderate
to High
Moderate
to High
Moderate
to High
Danger to
Operator
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Moderate
Comment
Detergents and/or surfactants
increase effectiveness.
Detergents and/or surfactants
increase effectiveness. Can
spread contaminants.
May be toxic or flammable.

Not for internal surfaces.
 Chemical Degradation Methods

 Chemical degradation of surface con-
 taminants can be a one-step treatment,
 and generated waste, if any, could
 contain no contaminant. These methods
 are mainly in the developmental stage.
 Methods presented in Table 5 are com-
 mercially available. Flash lamp clean-
 ing with pulse ultraviolet radiation
 that delivers localized, short-lasting,
 very high temperatures  is  a  promising
 emerging method for destruction  of
 surface contaminants.   The removal
 mechanism depends on the contaminant
 and treatment conditions.   The contam-
 inant can be photochemically reduced,
 vaporized, incinerated, pyrolyzed,
 or, in the presence of water, "steam
 cleaned."  Some such lamps are used
 for specialized cleaning operations.
 Lamps can be operated safely.
                                     -144-

-------
Table 5. Decontamination of Surfaces by Chemical Degradation Methods
Method
High Inten-
sity Light
(Xenon Lamp)
UV Light
Cleaning

Electro-
polishing
of Metal
Surfaces
Quantity of
Waste Produced
Small
Smal 1

Moderate
Cost
Low to
Moderate
Low to
Moderate

Moderate
to High
Danger to
Operator
Low
Low

Moderate
Comment
Most effective on flat
surfaces. For external
surfaces only.
Most effective on flat
surfaces. For external
surfaces only.
Developmental stage.
For small parts that
can be immersed.
External and internal
surfaces.
Electropolishing systems can be used
on a variety of alloy systems if
parts can be disasembled and immersed
in the liquid bath.  After treatment,
the metal must be rinsed off, dried,
and painted.
Mechanical Methods

Mechanical decontamination methods can
be abrasive or non-abrasive to the
equipment surfaces.  Abrasive methods
are destructive to the equipment and
generate large amounts of waste.
Table 6. Decontamination of Surfaces by Abrasive Methods
Method
Pigs
Brushes
Wet Abrasives
Dry Abrasives
Dry Ice
Blasting
Quantity of
Waste Produced
Moderate
Moderate
Large
Large
Smal 1
Cost
Low
Low
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Danger to
Operator
Low
Moderate
Moderate
High
Moderate
Comment
For internal surfaces
like pipes

Destructive to equipment
Destructive to equipment

                                    -145-

-------
Table 7. Decontamination of Surfaces by Non-Abrasive Methods
Method
High-Pressure
Water
(200-700 atm)
Ultra-high
Pressure Water
(1000-4000 atm)
High-Pressure
Freon 113™
Ultrasonic
Vacuum with
Filters
Quantity of
Waste Produced
Moderate
to Large
Moderate
to Large
Small
Small
Small
Cost
Moderate
Moderate
to High
High
Low to
Moderate
Low
Danger to
Operator
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Comment
For loosely adhering
contaminants.
For tightly adhering
contaminants.
Cleans cloth, rubber,
and plastic.
Effective for cleaning
small parts that can
be immersed.
For loosely adhering
contaminants.
Of mechanical methods presented in
Table 6 and Table 7 in field use are
vacuum systems with a HEPA filter or
an activated carbon filter, brushes,
ultra high-pressure water at 1,000
atm, and high-pressure Freon 113™.
All these systems are commercially
available.

Decontamination of Equipment at Reg-
Ion VII

The EPA Region VII decontamination pro-
cedure for dioxin-contaminated equip-
ment consists of a five step sequence.
This procedure is:

- Tap water  and detergent  (Alconox)
    wash/scrub (1 part "Alconox" and
    3 parts  water);
- Tap water  rinse;
- Deionized  water rinse;
- Methanol or Isopropyl alcohol  rinse;
- Air dry.
The above procedure was developed
early in the Missouri dioxin investi-
gations and was tested with quality
assurance/quality control (QA/QC) of
wipe and rinsate samples prior to its
present routine use.  The procedure
is used on all field equipment such
as backhoes, forklifts, front-end
loaders, drill rigs, trucks, and
trailers.  The cleaned equipment is
wipe-sampled and released only when
the analysis shows acceptable levels
of dioxin, not higher than 100 ng/rn^.
This procedure will be used on some
components of the EPA incineration
system before it leaves the Denney
Farm site.  The procedure is labor
intensive, particularly  for large
equipment.  It takes three people a
day or more to decontaminate a large
piece of  equipment.

The operators performing decontamina-
tion wear protective clothing and
                                    -146-

-------
 equipment that is required by the
 level of hazard in the operating zone;
 usually it is Level C of personnel
 protection.

 Decontamination equipment in use at
 Region VII consists of the following:
 steam jenny; vacuum with a HEPA fil-
 ter; tanks or containers for clean
 solutions such as tap water, deionized
 water, and alcohol; garden hoses and
 spray nozzles; brushes and rags; and
 wipe test sampling sets and jars for
 liquid or solid samples.  If possible,
 spent wash solutions are discarded
 into the ground in the contaminated
 zone; some of it is used to moisten
 the feea going to the shredder;  some-
 times alcohol is allowed to evaporate.

 However, at the end of the cleanup
 operation, and after the incinerator
 leaves, the remaining wash solutions
 must be treated.

 Most decontamination operations  at
 dioxin sites in Region VII are per-
 formed in the open.   The location  of
 the operation is always at the border
 between contaminated and clean zones
 so that decontaminated equipment is
 moved into the clean zone.   However,
 use of an enclosed structure with
 catchments for fumes,  wash  solutions,
 or solid waste, may be desirable when
many items of equipment are to be
decontaminated with a variety of
methods.

Also, some enclosed  decontamination
 systems for equipment  are commercially
available.
 CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT OR  TESTING

 The  need  for  decontamination and
 effectiveness of  decontamination are
 determined  by analyzing  samples taken
 from interior and  exterior surfaces
 of the  equipment,  and samples of wash
 solutions or  other wastes generated
 by the  decontamination operation are
 also analyzed.  The starting point is
 to determine  the  acceptable  level of
 decontamination of equipment surfaces.
 This enables  the  selection of both
 suitable decontamination and, analy-
 tical procedures.  In the case of
 dioxins, the  decontamination  level
 is the  same as the detection  level,
 which is the  the worst case.

 Sampling and  analytical  procedures
 for  decontamination assessment and
 the  number and location of samples to
 be taken are  specified in the decon-
 tamination plan.

 Most convenient for analysis of sur-
 face contaminants  in the field would
 be an instant instrumental reading.
 The  report describes a portable fluoro-
metric monitor for polynuclear aromatic
 hydrocarbons  on a  variety of surfaces,
 such as metals, plastics, and fabrics.
 The monitor was in the developmental
 stage at the time the report was
written.

For analysis of dioxins,  wipe samples
are taken from surfaces  and sent to
the laboratory.  In Region VII,  wipe
samples are analyzed within 24 hours
so the decontaminated equipment  can
be released the next day.
                                     -147-

-------
SUMMARY

Decontamination of mobile response
equipment operating at a hazardous
waste site is a requirement.  Any
measure taken to prevent contamination
will reduce hazard, time, and cost of
the future decontamination operation.

Both decontamination and contamina-
tion assessment procedures should be
selected and tested before taking
equipment to the field.  In some
cases, development of either decon-
tamination procedure or testing pro-
cedure, or both, may be necessary or
desirable.
BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.  Meade, J.P. and W.D.  Ellis.
    Decontamination Techniques for
    Mobile Response Equipment Used
    at Waste Sites (State-of-the-Art
    Survey), EPA/600/2-85/105, U.S.
    Environmental  Protection Agency,
    Cincinnati, Ohio, 1985, 74 pgs.

2.  RCRA Permit, Part B.   Applica-
    tion for the Operation of the
    U.S. EPA Mobile Incineration
    System at Penney Farm. McDowell,
    Missouri, 10/19/84.~

3.  Personal communications with
    Gary Kepko, On-Scene Coordinator,
    U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Region VII, 25 Funston
    Road, Kansas City, Kansas 66115.
                                     -148-

-------
                      LEAK PREVENTION IN UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS:

                                A STATE-OF-THE-ART SURVEY

                                    Anthony N. Tafuri
                                 Releases Control  Branch
                       Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                           U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
                                    Edison, NJ  08837

                            A.C. Gangadharan,  T.V. Narayanan,
                                 R. Raghavan,  G. Amoruso
                                Enviresponsei  Incorporated
                          Foster Wheeler Development Corporation
                                   Livingston, NJ  07039
ABSTRACT
     The objectives of this state-of-the-art survey were to examine the design and opera-
tional practices associated with underground storage tank (UST)  systems and to identify
areas for further research and development that would advance leak prevention  technology.

     Many standards, guidelines, and recommended practices for the design and   operation
of UST systems are currently promulgated by several professional  and industrial  organiza-
tions.  However, many of these procedures have overlapping requirements and there is  no
way of confirming how widely they are understood or followed in  the field.  Consequently,
there is a need for a cohesive and coordinated set of rules and  standards that apply  to
various types of UST systems, including those that store chemicals, and for further work
to assess and improve operating practices, including spill prevention and leak detection
methods and devices.
BACKGROUND

     Protecting the nation's groundwater
resources from contamination by regulated
substances* that leakt from underground
storage tank (UST) systems has emerged as
a major environmental issue.  More than
50 percent of the nation's population draw
drinking water from underground sources.
There are between 2 and 3.5 million under-
ground tanks buried across the nation, of
which some 100,000 tanks are estimated to
be presently leaking, and some 350,000
are expected to leak within-the next 5
years.  Accordingly, the need to improve
leak prevention technology is evident.
     *Regulated substances are those substances defined in Section 101 (14)
of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
of 1980, and petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is
liquid at 60°F, and 14.7 pounds per square inch absolute pressure.

     tin this paper, the word "leak" denotes all  unauthorized releases.
                                           -149-

-------
FACTORS AFFECTING LEAK PREVENTION

     Preventing leaks in UST systems
requires consideration of several factors,
including the system characteristics
(e.g., age, ownership, product stored,
size, etc.) and the elements of the
solution scheme (e.g., design and engi-
neering, fabrication and installation,
operation, corrective actions, etc.).

System Characteristics

     The age of an UST system influences
the solution option.  Leak prevention
technology is designed and engineered
into new systems.  In old installations,
it is a reactive step requiring system
monitoring, retrofitting, remediation and
restoration.  Identifying the problem is
the significant step in an abandoned
installation.

     UST system ownership affects leak
prevention.  Large industrial owners have
the technical, managerial, and financial
resources and the economic and legal
impetus to employ effective prevention
strategies.  Small owners lack money and
organization to develop their own methods
and procedures to prevent and remediate
leaks.  They require training in under-
standing the dimensions of the problem,
reliable methods and procedures for
solution, and incentives that compel them
to apply leak prevention programs.

     The largest class of regulated sub-
stances stored in UST systems is gasoline
and other petroleum products.  Accordingly,
these have been the primary focus of leak
prevention investigations thus far.  The
problem, however, extends far beyond
this.  The list of regulated substances
includes 698 chemicals which are stored
in USTs.  The different physical and
chemical properties, toxicity, transport,
and fate characteristics of such regulated
substances require different approaches
to leak prevention.

     The size of USTs has a significant
influence on leak prevention strategy.
Leak rates from large installations are
likely to be higher than from smaller
installations.  Size differences also pre-
sent problems as regards to construction
materials, design, inspection procedures,
leak monitoring, repair, maintenance, and
replacement schedules.

Elements of the Solution Scheme

     A leak prevention strategy should
ensure the integrity of the containment
boundaries for the life of the system;
avoid or minimize accidental  spills and
overflows; provide warning of impending
leaks; and prevent the spread of leaking
products.  These tasks require:  proper
design, engineering, fabrication and
installation, correct operation, and
appropriate corrective actions through
inspection, repair, and maintenance.
These requirements can be satisfied by
applying valid principles of mechanics
and other engineering sciences; ensuring
quality of materials and workmanship;
providing appropriate tools and equipment;
establishing appropriate schedules for
inspection, repair and maintenance; and
enforcing appropriate standards and
regulations.
DESCRIPTION OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
SYSTEMS

     A basic UST system includes tanks,
piping, and accessories.

Tanks

     Eighty-nine percent of existing USTs
are carbon steel.  Carbon steel  is compat-
ible with petroleum products, inexpensive,
available, easy to fabricate and repair,
strong, and relatively resistant to damage.
However, most carbon steel USTs  are not
protected against corrosion.

     Tanks that have corrosion protection
include steel tanks with internal  and
external coatings; cathodically  protected
steel tanks; fiberglass-reinforced plastic
(FRP) tanks, and steel-FRP-bonded composite
tanks.

     FRP tanks are a composite consisting
of a plastic resin matrix with a fiber-
glass reinforcement.  The resins must be
compatible with stored product(s)  and the
surrounding environment.  An estimated 24
percent of USTs storing petroleum products
                                           -150-

-------
use FRP tanks.  Steel-FRP-bonded tanks
have a steel  inner shell  and an FRP outer
layer fused by a polyester resin bond.
These combine the strength and stiffness
of steel with the corrosion resistance of
FRP.  Tanks made of stainless steel,
aluminum, and various plastics are used
in limited applications.
     Pipes used in USTs are made of a
variety of materials, including: carbon
steel; cast iron; stainless steel;  gal-
vanized steel; rubber, plastic, or  epoxy-
lined steel; plastic; and fiberglass-
reinforced plastic.  The same considera-
tions that enter into the selection of
the tank material apply to the piping
selection.  For example, carbon steel
pipes are compatible with petroleum;
however, they are susceptible to corro-
sion when they are kept in contact  with
corrosive chemicals.  On the other  hand,
cast iron pipes resist corrosion well,
and can be used to carry concentrated
acids.  They are brittle, however,  and
can break on impact or shock.  Both
carbon steel and cast iron are relatively
inexpensive.

Accessories

     Accessories in an LIST system include
valves, pumps, joints, fittings, vapor
recovery systems, overfill prevention
systems, and leak monitoring ports.

Secondary Containment

     Secondary containment retains  leaks
from a basic UST system, aids their
detection, and facilitates their cleanup.
Secondary containment can be accomplished
in two ways: (1) by building a barrier
between the basic system and the surround-
ing ground with flexible membrane liners,
a concrete vault, clay liners, or soil
sealants; or (2) by using a double-wall
structural configuration for tanks  and
pipes.  Both methods can be used in
combination.
DESIGN AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES

Properties of Products

     Physical, chemical, and hazard
characteristics of stored products are
important UST design considerations.
Critical characteristics include the
product's physical state at ambient
temperature, melting point, boiling
point, specific gravity, vapor pressure,
explosivity, flammability, combustibility
and corrosivity.

     When products stored in an UST system
comprise a mixture, the consequences  of
combining the constituent chemicals must
also be evaluated.  One method for deter-
mining these consequences is a chemical
class compatibility matrix (1).  The
method is based on grouping chemicals
into 38 classes based on similar molecular
structure and similar reactivity charac-
teristics.  Possible consequences (e.g.,
heat generation, explosion, violent poly-
merization, etc.) of mixing one class of
chemicals with another can be indicated
for ready design reference.

Mechanical Forces

     Mechanical forces imposed on an  UST
system and its components include: dead
loads due to product weight, self weight,
weight of soil overlay, reaction forces,
etc; live loads due to internal pressure,
thermal expansion forces, vehicular
traffic; and environmental loads due  to
wind, buoyancy pressure due to ground-
water table, seismic load in earthquake-
prone zones.  While most current designs
are based on manufacturer specifications
and industry standards, there are sophis-
ticated design methods and analytical
tools available to determine optimal
configurations, dimensions and layouts
of UST systems.

Corrosion

     Corrosion is a major cause of deteri-
oration and failure of metallic UST
                                          -151-

-------
systems.  It can occur internally and
externally.  Internal corrosion is largely
due to the incompatibility of the stored
product with materials of construction.
External corrosion is usually influenced
by soil resistivity; moisture content;
type and concentration of salts in the
soil; presence of certain types of bac-
teria; temperature; permeability of
surface film; presence of adjacent under-
ground metallic structures; and stray
underground electrical current.

     Corrosion can be prevented by pro-
viding cathodic protection that forces an
electric current toward, rather than away
from, UST components, or by selecting
materials of construction that inhibit
electric flow altogether.  Two design
concepts used for cathodic protection
include sacrificial anodes and impressed-
current systems.

Materials of Construction

     Materials used in UST systems include
various types of metals and polymeric
materials.  Structural strength and com-
patibility with products and soil environ-
ment are two key factors that determine
the choice of materials.  The American
Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) has
the most universally accepted standards
for construction materials.  However,
these standards do not include exposure
to all hazardous chemicals listed as
regulated substances.  Consequently, UST
manufacturer guidelines and specifications
should be consulted for selection of
appropriate materials.

Codes and Standards

     For the purpose of design classifi-
caton, UST systems may be grouped into:
systems that operate essentially at atmos-
pheric pressure; low-pressure systems
that operate at pressures up to 15 psig;
or high-pressure systems that operate at
pressures higher than 15 psig.

     Many technical standards, guidelines,
and recommended practices generated by
professional, trade, and industrial
organizations exist for the design of
these systems.  Most of the documents that
apply to atmospheric systems are developed
by the American Petroleum Institute, Amer-
ican Water Works Association, and Under-
writers Laboratories.  Most standards and
design guidelines that apply to lower-pres-
sure systems are from the American Petro-
leum Institute and the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers.  The ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code, by adoption, is a
legally binding standard in most states
and local jurisdictions for design, con-
struction, and operation of high-pressure
systems.  The American Petroleum Insti-
tute and the National Fire Protection
Association also have some codes perti-
nent to high-pressure systems.

     Several states have already estab-
lished, or are in the process of estab-
lishing, UST regulations incorporating
many of the previously mentioned guide-
lines.  These include California,
Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Maryland,
New Jersey, New Hampshire, New York, and
Rhode Island.
INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES

     Improper installation of UST systems
is a common cause of leakage.  Proper
installation and testing procedures that
are based on sound engineering principles
can reduce such leakages.  These proce^
dures include: investigation of soil
conditions and characteristics; selection
of materials of construction appropriate
for design conditions; selection of
proper bedding and backfill  material;
handling and care of equipment during
construction; tightness testing require-
ments; and supervision requirements.

     Although state regulations vary,
most of them require the installation of
double-walled tanks or secondary contain-
ment systems such as flexible membrane
liners, concrete vaults, clay liners,
and soil sealants; overfill  protection;
leak monitoring wells; and leakage alarm
systems.  Each system has very specific
guidelines pertaining to installation
procedures, cost differentials, and
environmental conditions.
                                          -152-

-------
Piping and Accessories Installation
Vapor Recovery Systems
     Selection, installation, and testing
of UST system piping must be based upon
appropriate standards and guidelines.
Field connections must be made properly
and protected against corrosion.  This
involves the cleaning and preparation of
the surfaces to be connected, proper use
of thermowelding or mechanical clamps,
and application of effective corrosion
protection to the bare areas before back-
filling.
OPERATING PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES

     Professional, trade, and industrial
organizations have developed operating
procedures and guidelines concerning over-
fill prevention, transfer spill prevention,
vapor recovery, and leak detection and
monitoring.  There procedures are designed
to prevent the release of products during
filling and transfer operations, and to
enable prompt recognition of underground
leaks that result from impairment of tanks,
pipes, or accessories.

Overfill Prevention

     An ideal overfill prevention system
includes a level-sensing device equipped
with an alarm to alert the operator of an
impending overfill and an automatic
product shutoff when the tank is full.
Many states have specific regulations
pertaining to overfill protection.  These
range from automated overfill systems to  ,
delivery operator determination to manhole
containment.

Transfer Spill Prevention

     Proper operating practices that
should be followed to prevent transfer
spills are well documented.  These prac-
tices require: tight connections between
the hose and fill pipe; periodic inspec-
tion of all transfer hoses; inspection of
tank ullage before product delivery to
ensure sufficient capacity; proper identi-
fication of stored products and container
capacities; and proper training of all
operators who perform loading or
unloading operations.
     Gasoline vapors and volatile organic
compound emissions from UST systems may
violate ambient air quality standards.
These releases occur during UST filling
and vehicle refueling.  Vapors are also
emitted from truck tanks as gasoline
displaces the gasoline-enriched air in
the.tank.  These vapors can be controlled
by venting through charcoal filters in the
truck tank itself or back into the UST.

Leak Detection

     Leak detection is an integral part
of the regulatory requirements associated
with preventing leaks.  Several states
already have such requirements.  Methods
and strategies for leak detection include:
inventory control, continuous in-tank leak
monitoring, nonvolumetric methods, leak
effects monitoring, and tank integrity
testing.

Inspection

     Proper inspection of tanks and other
UST components is carried out before,
during, and after the system is installed
and operated to determine the structural
integrity of the system and to evaluate
possible corrective actions should problems
be found.  Inspection of existing UST
systems is difficult, if not impossible,
unless provisions have been made for
inspection ports, manways, and other means
of access.

     A quality inspection program should
identify excessive corrosion, erosion of
interior parts due to abrasion by particles
suspended in moving fluids, structural
fatigue or cracking, deterioration of
liners and accessories, and weakened or
cracked welds and joints.  Formal check-
lists, records of inspection, and frequent
inspections ensure a quality program.

     Physical, nondestructive inspections
of UST systems are not always possible
nor do they always give a reliable assess-
ment of the UST system's integrity.  Thus,
predictive methods, based on theoretical
or empirical  models, supplement physical
inspections and aid in scheduling tests,
                                         -153-

-------
maintenance, and repair.  Two predictive
models proposed and used by the Petroleum
Association for Conservation of the Cana-
dian Environment (PACE) are the Soil
Aggressiveness Value (SAV) method (2) and
Roger's Regression Analysis (3).

     The SAV method is based on the pre-
mise that the age at which an underground
storage tank leaks is directly related to
the surrounding soil condition.  The soil
condition is characterized by a SAV which
is an aggregate number determined on the
basis of the following soil properties:
average values of soil resistivity, soil
pH, and soil moisture; differential values
(i.e., the  ranges of resistivity and pH);
   and  presence  of  sulfides  (which promote
   bacterial  action  on the surface of the
   tank).

        The data obtained by the  PACE on tank
   age  at  failure,  and the corresponding
   SAV, have  been developed  into  a tank
   evaluation graph  (Figure  1).   The region
   below the  curve  S,  given  by the equation
   SAV  x Age  = 69,  represents a 95 percent
   confidence bound  for  occurrence of no
   leaks.   The higher  the SAV x Age value,
   the  higher the probability that the tank
   will leak.  The  curve SAV x Age = 180
   envelopes  40 percent  of all leaks.  Based
   on these analyses,  PACE recommended the
   following  corrective  actions:
              Region
                                           Recommended Action
           1.   I _> 180
           2.   69 <_ I < 180
           3.   I < 69 and SAV _> 4
           4.   I < 69 and SAV < 4
Replace tank
Test, and replace or retrofit
Retrofit
Benign, no corrective action warranted
                           where  I = SAV x Age
      Roger's  regression analysis method
 is  based  on a statistical analysis of the
 age-to-leak data correlated to measureable
   characteristics of the tank environment.
   The correlation equation for mean age-to-
   leak is given by:
                            L =  5.75 R-05 T--107 exp  (.12? -  .42 M - .265)
 where  L is  the mean-age-to-leak  in years;
 R is the soil resistivity  in  ohm-cm;  T  is
 the tank size in  Imperial  gallons; P  is
 the soil pH; M is a  factor related to
 moisture content  in  the  soil  (1  for sat-
 urated, 0.5 for damp,  and  0 for  dry); and
 S is a factor related  to sulfides content
 in the soil  (1 for strongly present,  0.5
 for trace,  and 0  for no  sulfides).

      It is  claimed that  approximately 75
 percent of  the total variability in the
 dependent variable L is  explained, with
 a high degree of  statistical  significance,
 by the full  set  of independent variables
 included in the model.  Roger's  equation,
 exercised with  four  sets of values for
 independent variables, results in  a mean
 age-to-leak range from 13.5-16 years,
 with  an average  of 14.9  years.  This  pre-
 diction is  close  to  variously reported
 mean  ages-to-leak of 17-19 years.

      It should  be noted  that this method
 does  not allow for changes in the values
   of the independent variables that would,
   most likely, occur, e.g., in soil resis-
   tivity and moisture content, during the
   life of the tank system.  Also, the
   method assumes that tank failure occurs
   as a consequence of only the external
   soil properties without any influence of
   internal condition.

   MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR

        There are presently no standard in-
   spection, maintenance, or repair practices
   available for tank owners.  However, many
   states are introducing regulations for
   such practices.  This will require quali-
   fied inspectors, testers, and maintenance
   personnel trained to recognize impending
   failures, and to respond with appropriate
   corrective actions.  Designers, manufac-
   turers, installers, and suppliers must
   provide input to develop procedures and
   practices that can be easily implemented
   by the owners and operators of UST
   systems.
                                          -154-

-------
    13

    12

    11

ut   10


I   9

3   8
ui
LU >"

55 2, 8

UI   -
EC   5
C3
<   A
        o
        
-------
                                 A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF
                    UNDERGROUND TANKS USED FOR CERCLA CHEMICAL STORAGE

                                        Ihor Lysyj
                       Environmental Monitoring and Services, Inc.
                                  Camarillo, California

                     Robert Hillger, John S. Farlow and Richard Field
                           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                    Edison, New Jersey
                                         ABSTRACT


     The scope and severity of leaking underground storage tanks (USTc) containing chemi-
cals have not been well defined.  A study was undertaken for the United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA) to collect and analyze data on USTs with the goals of (1)
obtaining better information on the chemical UST population and (2) developing a strategy
to rank underground tanks according to the hazard potential of their stored chemicals.
The study addresed only Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) chemicals.  Information sources included State surveys in California and New
York and data from the Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA).  The analysis considered
the nature (physical-chemical and toxicological properties) of the stored chemicals, tank
population, size and age of tanks, materials of tank construction, and means of tank
corrosion protection.

     Solvents constitute the bulk (70-90%) of the organic CERCLA substances stored in
USTs.  As reported by CMA, the most prevalent organic solvents (acetone, methanol,
toluene, methylene chloride, and xylene) constituted over 50% (both by number of tanks and
volume stored) of all CERCLA substances in USTs.  The average tank size reported by
California and New York was 6,000 gallons, while those reported by the CMA was 15,000
gallons.  The average tank age reported by CMA was 18 years.  The majority are single
walled, steel tanks that are protected against corrosion only by paint.
INTRODUCTION

     The recent and rather sudden realiza-
tion of the real and potential dangers to
human life, environment, and the economy
from leaking underground storage tanks
(UST) has resulted in major regulatory
efforts by federal, state, and local
governments.  On the federal level the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) was reauthorized and signed by the
President in November of 1984.  Subtitle I
of this Act directs the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to
promulgate regulations to control leakage
from USTs.  Deadlines mandated are:
registration by owners of all tanks with
the states by May 1986, estabishment of new
standards for petroleum USTs by February
1987, and establishment of new standards
for chemical USTs by August 1988.  Some
states have undertaken parallel action by
promulgating their own regulations for UST
control [1].  The major thrust of ongoing
research is currently directed toward pet-
roleum products, while relatively little
                                           -156-

-------
attention is being paid to chemicals stored
in underground tanks.  This paper is based
on a project that defined the physical uni-
verse of CERCLA chemical USTs.  Included
are the nature (physical-chemical and toxi-
cological properties) and the quantity of
stored chemicals, as well as the size,
design, and construction characteristics of
USTs.  The objective is to provide a fac-
tual basis for the prioritization of UST
leak control research (as a function of the
stored chemicals).

     The EPA divided UST leak control
research into three main categories, i.e.,
leak detection/monitoring, leak prevention,
and corrective action.  As indicated,
research has begun for petroleum tanks.
The main emphasis is on volumetric leak
detection methods (e.g., those based on
changes in liquid level).  State-of-the-art
information has also been compiled for
petroleum tank leak prevention and correc-
tive action; however, chemical tanks have
not yet been addressed.  As a first cut,
this project used a matricized ranking
method for CERCLA chemical hazard potential
to enable EPA to optimize a research
program strategy for chemical tanks.  Along
with volume and number of tanks, the matrix
included toxicity, ignitibility/reactivity,
and viscosity/density of stored chemicals.

     The results of this analysis will pri-
marily be used for an intelligent estimate
of the national hazard potential of stored
chemicals.  From this, chemicals can be
grouped and prioritized for UST research
and regulatory purposes.  Chemicals with
similar physical-chemical properties will
be grouped together.  The properties
(including toxicity) will be used for hard-
ware compatability requirements, industrial
hygiene standards (human handling
requirements), and signal-sensing require-
ments for volumetric (liquid level) leak
detection.  These groupings will further be
used in developing a logical research
progression in the prevention and correc-
tive action categories, and will provide
an important reference/database for on-
scene decision-making in the case of
corrective action needs.
SCOPE

     Since EPA has mandated deadline for
new standards for CERCLA chemical USTs,
this project was designed to provide a
logical foundation for chemical UST leakage
control research.  Aside from petroleum,
Subtitle I of the reauthorized RCRA, defi-
nes regulated substances as those chemicals
that are listed under Section 101 (14) of
CERCLA [2], excluding hazardous waste.

     All 611 CERCLA chemicals (excluding
those substances that fall under the CERCLA
categories of waste streams) defined by
Section 101 (14) were considered in this
study.  Specifically, an attempt was made
to determine:

a)   composition of regulated substances
     stored underground
b)   number and volume of tanks storing
     each substance
c)   UST design characteristics, including
     materials of construction and corro-
     sion protection
d)   age of tanks.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION

     Chemicals that require underground
storage because of either flammability or
other safety hazards are produced and
handled by the commercial community that
can be classified as:

             0 Primary Producers
             0 Formulators - Distributors
             0 Ultimate Users

     The relative number of underground
storage tanks increases from top to bottom
in this classification scheme.

     Commerce generally dictates the nature
and quantity of chemicals developed by the
primary producers.  The primary producers
provide large quantities of these chemical:
in bulk storage for use by the chemical
formulators who combine these chemicals
into useful products and sell them to
industrial, agricultural, and household
users.  Chemical distributors perform
similar function by repackaging.  The
majority of tanks are owned by chemicalj
users, such as manufacturing, agricultjj
and service operations.  Principal sou
of UST information used in this study]
State surveys in California [3,4] anc
York [5].  Additional information
vided by CMA, a trade organization
represents primary chemical produce
                                           -157-

-------
nationally [63.

REPRESENTATIVENESS AND COMPLETENESS OF DATA

     Available state sources of UST infor-
mation included:  summary reports from
California representing 100% of its UST
users [3,43 and a computer data base file
of hazardous substances stored in USTs in
New York [53 representing approximately 90%
of the New York UST population.  A CMA sur-
vey of its members (178 companies repre-
senting 90% of primary chemical producers)
[63 resulted in a 34% response of its mem-
bership.  The product of this survey is a
list of tank capacities, contents, status,
(in use or abandoned), construction, corro-
sion protection, and age.

     Each information source provided a
different perspective on the universe of
USTs.  The CMA data are national in scope
and, while somewhat incomplete, neverthe-
less indicate general patterns prevailing
in the primary producing industry.
California is a large southwestern coastal
state with an integrated industrial/agri-
cultural base and a significant contribu-
tion of new technologies.  New York is a
large northeastern state, with a broad
industrial/agricultural base and a prepon-
 
-------
UST Design Characteristics

     The data (Table 3) indicates that the
great majority of New York and CMA USTs
that store chemicals are made of steel
(94%) and are single walled.  The remainder
are made of concrete, copper, fiberglass,
aluminum, or polymeric materials.  More
than one-half (56%) of the tanks are pro-
tected only by paint and only 18% have
cathodic protection; the remainder use tar
and fiberglass coatings.  The age of USTs
ranges between brand new and 60 years.  The
mean and .median ages are each 18 years 16].
CONCLUSIONS

     Both organic and  inorganic substances
are stored in underground tanks.  The orga-
nics constitute the major part (92%) of
CERCLA chemicals stored  underground by
major chemical producers.   Significant
amounts of inorganic substances,  however,
are stored underground by users of chemi-
cals in hardware manufacturing and in
electroplating.  Seventy to 90% of the
organic substances stored underground are
solvents, including:,  alcohols; ketones;
alicyclic, aromatic, and chlorinated hydro-
carbons; esters; and ethers.  Monomers  and
miscellaneous chemicals  constitute the
balance.  Based on the California and New
York data, it appears  that  only a small
fraction (1  to 2 percent) of the  total  UST
population is devoted  to storing  CERCLA
chemicals.   Petroleum  products comprise
98-99% of the total  liquids stored in USTs.
The top five CERCLA  chemicals stored
underground  are acetone, methanol, toluene,
xylene, and  methylene  chloride.   These  five
solvents represent over  50% of the CERCLA
organics stored underground.

     The majority  of underground  tanks  used
for storing  chemicals  are made of steel and
are single walled.    More than  half  are
corrosion protected  only by paint.   The
 average tank size  reported  by the two  sta-
 tes  is 6,000 gallons,  while CMA  data show
that  primary chemical  producers  use  tanks
 of a  larger  size  (15,000 gallons).

      The  conclusions from  this  study are
 based  on  an organized and  logical  ranking
 of the  stored  substances and will aid the
 EPA in  developing  a research and  rulemaking
 program for  leak  detection, prevention, and
 corrective  action  of CERCLA hazardous
 substances stored in USTs.

 REFERENCES

 1.    "California Underground Storage Tank
      Regulation."  California State/Water
i.     Resources Control  Board, Sacramento,
      CA, August 1985.

 2.    Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40,
      Part 302, US GPO,  Washington, DC,
      1986.

 3.    "Underground Container Program - Con-
      tainer Summary by County".  State
      Water Resources Control Board, Sacra-
      mento, CA, October 1985.

 4.    Jack Kooyoomjian, "CERCLA Hazardous
      Substances in California USTs".  Priv-
      ate communication, EPA/OERR.

 5.    Richard Coriale and Russell Brauk-
      sieck, "Revelation Computer File and
      Data Summary".  New York Dept. of En-
      vironmental Conservation, Division of
      Water, Bureau of Spill Prevention and
      Response, Albany, NY, January 1987.

 6.    "Tank Notification".  Jeff Reamy,
      Chemical Manufacturers Associationj
      Washington, DC, August 1986.
                                            -159-

-------
                                  TABLE 1
         PREDOMINANT TYPES OF ORGANIC CHEMICALS STORED UNDERGROUND
                               (by percent*)

SOLVENTS
Ketones/al dehydes
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Alcohols
Chlorinated hydrocarbons
Esters
Ali cyclic hydrocarbons
Total solvents
MONOMERS
MISCELLANEOUS CHEMICALS
PESTICIDES
California
1 2
35.6 32.9
22.2 21.1
10.2 8.8
12.5 14.0
6.0 4.4
0.6 0.7
87.1 81.9
3.6 6.2
7.4 7.0
1.4 4.2
New York
1 2
25.2 31.5
37.8 32.9
16.5 17.2
5.7 4.0
6.2 4.4
91.4 90.0
2.8 1.6
6.0 8.0
CMA
1 2
23.5 21.7
21.8 22.3
18.8 16.8
12.6 10.3
1.2 0.8
0.4 0.4
78.3 72.3
13.3 22.2
8.8 5.0
Note:  l=number of USTs; 2=volume of USTs

* Totals may not sum to 100% because of rounding
                                    -160-

-------
                                         TABLE  2
                      MAJOR ORGANIC CERCLA SUBSTANCES STORED IN USTs
Chemical Groups
Ketones/Aldehydes
Acetone
Methyl ethyl
ketone
Methyl isobutyl
ketone
Cyclohexanone
Formal dehyde
Acet aldehyde
Total
Aromatic Hydro-
carbons
Toluene
Xylene
Benzene
Ethyl Benzene
TOTAL
Alcohols
Methanol
n-Butanol
iso-Butanol
TOTAL
Ali cyclic Hydro-
carbons
Cyclohexane
California
1
441 22.8
205 10.3
38 1.9
7 0.4
14 0.7
2 0.1
707 35.6
265 13.3
162 8.1
9 0.5
5 0.3
441 22.3
131 6.6
46 2.3
25 1.3
202 10.2
12 0.6
2
2334 18.0
1254 9.6
235 1.8
45 0.4
401 3.1
10 0.1
4282 32.9
1847 14.2
818 6.3
28 0.2
47 0.4
2740 21.1
714 5.5
277 2.1
158 1.2
1149 8.8
67 0.7
New York
1
43 12.0
32 9.0
12 3.8
3 0.8
90 25.2
80 22.4
54 15.5
1 0.3
135 37.8
41 11.5
14 3.9
4 1.1
59 16.5
2
319 18.3
122 7.0
78 4.5
30 1.7
549 31.5
369 21.1
205 11.7
1 0.1
575 32.9
149 8.5
146 8.4
5 0.3
300 17.2
CMA
1
98 17.8
21 3.8
8 1.5
1 0.2
1 0.2
129 23.5
72 13.1
31 5.6
10 1.8
7, 1.3
120 21.6
87 15.8
11 2.0
4 1.0
102 18.8
2 0.4
2
1682 19.1
145 1.6
66 0.8
2 <0.1
20 0.2
1915 21.7
1481 16.9
300 3.4
120 1.4
56 0.6
1957 22.3
1309 14.9
130 1.5
37 0.4
1476 16.8
63 0.4
Note: l=number of USTs; 2=volume of USTs in thousands of gallons
                                           -161-

-------
                                      TABLE 2 (cont.)
                      MAJOR ORGANIC CERCLA SUBSTANCES STORED IN USTs
Chemical Groups

Chlorinated Hydro-
carbons
Methylene chloride
Methyl chloride
1,1,1-Trichloro-
ethane
Trichloroethylene
Dichloropropane
Chlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloro-
propane
Chloroform
Ethyl ene di-
chloride
Tetrachloro-
ethylene
Pentachlorophenol
Carbon tetra-
chloride
Trichlorobenzene
1,2 Dichloro
ethyl ene
Methyl bromide
Ethyl ene di bromide
1,1,2-Trichloro-
ethane
TOTALS
Esthers
Ethyl acetate
n-Butyl acetate
iso-Butyl acetate
Amyl acetate
TOTALS
California
1
%


56 2.8
6 0.3

71 3.6
18 0.9
1 <0.1
3 0.2

—
12 0.6

13 0.7

36 1.8
12 0.6

3 0.2
3 0.2

1 <0.1
1 <0.1
1 <0.1

3 0.2
247 12.5

22 1.1
94 4.7
—
3 0.2
119 6.0
2
%


269 2.1
21 0.2

250 1.9
71 0.5
10 0.1
3 <0.1

—
465 3.6

367 2.8

146 1.1
144 1.1

28 0.2
11 0.1

10 0.1
10 0.1
9 0.1

3 <0.1
1823 14.0

111 0.9
431 3.3
—
22 0.2
564 4.4
New York
1
%


5 1.4
1 0.3

9 2.5
2 0.6
—
1 0.3

—
—

1 0.3

—
—

1 0.3
—

—
—
—

—
20 5.7

7 2.0
2 0.6
13 3.6
—
22 6.2
2
%


13 0.7
4 0.2

12 0.7
11 0.6
—
30 1.7

—
—

1 <0.1

—
—

1 0.1
—

—
—
—

—
71 4.0

23 1.3
8 0.5
46 2.6
—
57 4.4
C
1
%


47 8.5
10 1.8

6 1.1
2 0.4
3 0.4
1 0.2

1 0.2
—

—

—
—

__
__

—
—
—

--
69 12.6

2 0.4
2 0.4
2 0.4
—
6 1.2
MA
2
%


666 7.6
31 0.4

99 1.1
80 0.9
24 0.3
3 <0.1

4 <0.1
—

" —

—
—

—
—

—

—

—
907 10.3

44 0.5
12 0.2
15 0.2
. —
71 0.8
Note:  l=number of USTs; 2=volume of USTs in thousands of gallons
                                           -162-

-------
                     TABLE  2  (cont.)
     MAJOR ORGANIC CERCLA SUBSTANCES  STORED .IN  USTs
Chemical Groups

Monomers
Aero lain
Ethyl ene oxide
Styrene
Acryl on i tr i 1 e
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
Methyl metha-
cryl ate
Vinyl i dene
chloride
Propylene oxide
l-Chloro-2,3-
epoxypropane
Ally! chloride
Ethyl acrylate
TOTALS
Miscellaneous
Chemicals
Pesticides
TOTALS
California
1
%

—
3 0.2
33 1.7
1 <0.1
11 0.6
1 <0.1

6 0.3

4 0.2
7 0.4

—
--
3 0.2
69 3.6

145 7.4
37 1.4
1979
2
%

—
40 0.3
340 2.6
20 0.2
165 1.3
10 0.1

61 0.5

58 0.4
58 0.4

—
—
51 0.4
803 6.2

951 7.0
598 4.2
12997
New York
1
%

—

1 0.3
--
4 1.1
—

1 0.3


1 0.3

—
—
3 0.8
10 2.8

21 6.0
— —
357
2
%

—
—
6 0.3
—
6 0.3
--

1 0.1

—
10 0.6

—
—
6 0.3
29 1.6

144 8.0
— —
1725
C
1
%

15 2.7
14 2.5
13 .1.4
9 1.6
7 1.3
5 0.9

5 0.9

1 0.2
1 0.2

1 0.2
2 0.4
--
73 13.3

48 8.8
_-
549
MA
2
%

787 9.0
345 3.9
305 3.5
52 0.6
151 1.7
163 1.9

48 0.5

7 0.1
20 0.2

50 0.6
20 0. 2
--
1948 2.2

452 5.0
• __.
8725
Note: l=number of USTs; 2=volume of USTs in thousands of gallons
                         TABLE 3
                UST DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
by percent

STEEL
Carbon
Stainless
Double Wall
TOTAL
Concrete
Fibreglass
Copper
Aluminum
OTHERS
New York
86.4
3.4
0.5
90.3
3.4
3.4
2.9
CMA
87.7
6.0
ND*
93.7
3.5
0.7
1.1
6.2
0.8
*ND - Not determined
                          -163-

-------
               U.S. EPA EVALUATION OF VOLUMETRIC UST LEAK DETECTION METHODS

                        Joseph W. Maresca, Jr. and Robert D. Roach
                                   Vista Research, Inc.
                                   Palo Alto, CA  94303

                                     James W. Starr *
                                    Enviresponse, Inc.
                               Livingston, New Jersey 07039

                                      John S. Farlow
                           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                    Edison, NJ  08837
                                        ABSTRACT
     This report summarizes the quantitative results through January 12,  1987  of  the
ongoing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Hazardous Waste Engineering  Research
Laboratory program to evaluate the performance of commercially available, volumetric  test
methods for detecting leaks in underground petroleum storage tank systems.  Volumetric
methods (i.e., those operating in or on the tank that yield a quantitative estimate of
the leak rate) can be influenced by a wide variety of environmental  factors, all  of
which can significantly reduce the accuracy of the measurement.

     The first set of full-scale product temperature experiments on  a 30,285 L (8,000 gal)
tank were conducted to assess the impact of thermally-induced volume fluctuations on  the
testing of overfilled tanks, the most common test condition.  The initial  data indicate
first that thermal effects are large when the temperature of the added product is differ-
ent from that of the in situ ground and stored product temperature,  even  24 h  after pro-
duct delivery, and second that these effects can significantly impair a method's  ability
to detect small leaks unless the thermally-induced volume changes are compensated. When
the vertical and horizontal distribution of temperature was investigated, the  results
indicated that volume-weighted temperature changes measured by a single vertical  ther-
mistor array located at the fill hole of the tank would be adequate for compensation of
thermally-induced volume changes of the product throughout the tank.  The results also
indicated that a 20 cm (8 in.) vertical separation of thermistors on the  array was ade-
quate to characterize the temperature fluctuations that caused these volume changes.

     An estimate of the technological limits of detecting leaks with volumetric test
methods is also being made.  These results can be used to assess the performance  of
existing test methods, as well as new ones that might be developed in the future. The
analysis suggests that, with proper instrumentation and procedures,  a leak rate of
0.19 L/h (0.05 gal/h) can be detected with a probability of detection (PD) of  0.95 and
a probability of false alarm (PFA) of 0.001, providing no other sources of ambient
noise are present (e.g., tank deformation, vapor pocket).
* Now with Vista Research, Inc., Palo Alto, California 94303
                                            -164-

-------
INTRODUCTION

     Leaking petroleum underground storage
tanks (USTs) represent a serious environ-
mental threat.  The United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA) recently
estimated that approximately 25% of the
UST throughout the United States are
leaking at a rate of 0.23 L/h (0.06 gal/h)
or greater (1).  Records from past release
incidents indicate that, without the use
of release detection, a release can
become substantial before it is detected.
Most releases are first detected by
people seeing, test tasting, or smelling
the released material in the environment.
Only about 20% of the releases have been
detected by inventory reconciliation or
tank tightness testing procedures.  The
voluntary practice of release detection
by UST owners and operators gives rise
to the low percentage of incidents
reported by release detection methods (2).

     The 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments to the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 have charged the
EPA with developing regulations for the
detection of releases from UST.  Develop-
ment of technically sound and defensible
regulations requires that the threat to
the environment and the technological
limits of release detection be known.
The threat to the environment is extremely
difficult to define because the transport,
fate, and amount of petroleum considered
hazardous in the environment are not
sufficiently known.  A performance stan-
dard that is based on the current techno-
logy will minimize the uncontrolled
release of petroleum product.  Unfortu-
nately, the data required to formulate a
realistic regulatory policy are incomplete
or nonexistent.  Many commercially avail-
able leak detection methods can be used
to detect small releases.  Claims of
excellent performance are made, but little
evidence, theoretical or experimental, is
provided to support these claims.  Most
manufacturers of test methods claim to
detect leak rates of 0.19 L/h (0.05
gal/h) or smaller, the practice recom-
mended by the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) Pamphlet 329 (3).
Limited evidence suggests that the most
common methods are not reliably meeting
this claim (4).

     The environmental hazards posed by
uncontrolled releases from UST are so
formidable that they require the system-
atic application of current and evolving
release detection technology.  The
Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory (HWERL) is currently conducting
a research program to characterize the
performance of the commercially available
volumetric tightness test methods and to
determine the technological limits of
detection using this approach.  A detailed
description of the project is presented
in "Protocol For Evaluating Volumetric
Leak Detection Methods for Underground
Storage Tanks" (5).  An overview of the
approach, including a discussion of the
major variables affecting volumetric leak
detection methods and a description of
EPA's full-scale, environmentally safe
test apparatus, has also been published
(6).  Over 40 volumetric detection
methods have been identified so far.

     The purpose of this engineering
research program is to evaluate commercial
volumetric methods for detecting leaks in
underground storage tanks containing
petroleum motor fuels such as gasoline,
kerosene, and diesel oil.  The results
will be used to develop regulations to
reduce the pollution of groundwater by
leaks from these tanks.  This progress
report briefly summarizes the important
results to date derived from the experi-
ments being conducted in the specially
designed test apparatus located at the
EPA's Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory (HWERL) facility in Edison,
New Jersey.  A complete research report
will be published at the conclusion of
this research project.
OVERFILLED TANK TEST EXPERIMENTS

     The most common method of release
detection is a volumetric tank tightness
test.  Product level changes in the tank
are measured and converted to volume
changes through the knowledge of the
tank geometry.  Product level measurements
alone are not sufficient to detect a small
leak, because the height changes that
normally occur in a tank that is not leak-
ing are large enough to mask a small leak.
These volume changes can arise from expan-
sion or contraction of the product in the
tank by temperature changes, expansion or
contraction of the volume of any trapped
                                           -165-

-------
vapor by temperature and pressure changes,
structural deformation of the tank ends
and walls, evaporation or condensation of
the product, and surface and internal
waves.  A method of compensating for each
of these sources of ambient noise is
required to detect small leaks.

     Three classes of volumetric tank test
methods are being evaluated: overfilled
tank test methods, partially-filled
tank test methods, and methods that
circulate product in the tank.  The most
common method of tank testing is the
overfilled tank test.  This type of
method tests the entire system (tank,
piping, and associated underground equip-
ment) for leaks, but requires the purchase
of sufficient additional product to fill
the tank system completely.  For a low-
budget operator, this requirement can
impose a substantial financial hardship.
It should also be remarked that many UST
systems are never filled this full at any
time during routine operations.

     In this method, product is added
to the existing product in the tank to
obtain a level in the fill tube itself
or in an above-ground extension of the
fill tube.  Accurate measurement of
product level in the fill tube is easy;
for example, a 0.04 L (0.01 gal) volume
causes a 0.37 cm (0.15 in.) product
level change in a system with a 10 cm
(4 in.) fill tube with a 5 cm (2 in.)
vent tube.
Ambient Noise

     A comprehensive set of experiments
is being conducted in the test apparatus
to characterize and model the magnitude
of each source of ambient fluctuations
that limit the performance of volumetric
leak detection test methods.  The first
tests focused on the volumetric fluctua-
tions that limit the performance of test
methods that overfill the tank.  The
dominant ambient volume fluctuations for
these test methods are:

o  expansion and contraction of the
   product in the tank by temperature
   changes,

o  expansion and contraction of trapped
   vapor in the tank and piping by temper-
   ature and pressure changes, and

o  structural deformation of the tank by
   changing product levels before or
   during the test.

     Product level  changes in overfilled
tank test methods will  be generated by
summing the volume changes effected by
these three sources of noise.  Three types
of experimental runs are being conducted
to collect the data required to develop
these three models and to validate them.
This is accomplished by designing a set
of experiments to isolate each noise
source and show that the residual volume
fluctuations, after subtracting the
volume fluctuations predicted by the noise
model from the measured product fluctua-
tions, are small enough to be negligible
(i.e., less than 0.04 L/h).

     Product level  changes due to evapor-
ation or condensation are small because
of the small surface area open to the
atmosphere.  Surface waves are essentially
nonexistent, although a long period stand-
ing wave (seich) in the tank is possible
due to multiple openings in the tank
which may be vented to the atmosphere
during a test.  Internal waves in a tank
will cause periodic temperature changes
and sometimes periodic product level
fluctuations that are unrelated to the
temperature changes required to estimate
thermal expansion or contraction of the
product.  These effects, which are charac-
teristic of the temperature field, can be
minimized by properly sampling and filtering
the data.

     Thirteen 24- to 48-h tests have
already been conducted to characterize
the temperature field and volume changes
generated by temperature fluctuations.
Each run has been conducted by adding
15,142 L of product to the half-filled
30,245 L capacity steel tank at tempera-
tures that are 0 to 10°C cooler or warmer
than the temperature of the ground, and
of the in situ stored product.  After
adding product, all tests were conducted
with the fluid level between 234 cm
(92 in.) and 236 cm (94 in.)  This level
permits temperature changes in a full tank
to be approximated accurately without
trapping vapor pockets.
                                          -166-

-------
Product Temperature Analysis

     Three analyses of data from these
thirteen tests have been performed.  The
first analysis estimates and tabulates
the magnitude of the thermal volume
changes as a function of time after deli-
very.  The results indicate that ther-
mally-induced volume changes are large,
even 24 h after adding product to the
tank, and that temperature compensation
is necessary to conduct an accurate tank
test.  In the course of a 24-h test,
uncompehsated volume rates of 1 to 3 L/h
were observed.

     The second and third analyses charac-
terize the vertical and horizontal spatial
inhomogeneities of the temperature field,
respectively.  The coefficient of thermal
expansion, the volume of the product in
the tank, and the temperature change of
the product is required to estimate
thermally-induced volume changes of the
product.  The second temperature study
was performed to compare the ability of
each of the three thermistor arrays to
measure thermally-induced volume changes
in the tank.  In particular, this analysis
examined whether one thermistor array is
sufficient to characterize the temperature
field of the whole tank.  The data were
analyzed as follows:

o  A thermally-induced volume change time
   series was generated for each ther-
   mistor array as well as for the average
   of the three arrays.

o  The average thermally-induced volume
   change computed for all three arrays
   was subtracted from each array's
   volume, and the residuals were differ-
   entiated and smoothed with a 1-h box
   car window (running average).

o  The root mean square (rms) error was
   calculated for successive 2-h segments
   to give an estimate of the error in a
   thermally-compensated leak rate deter-
   mined from an individual  array.

     Results suggest that a single verti-
cal array of thermistors having a spacing
of 20 cm is sufficient to characterize
the temperature field of the whole (2.4 m
diameter by 6.1 m long) tank when testing
is begun at least 4 to 6 h after product
delivery.  In the first 4 to 6 h, large
differences in temperature between the
three horizontally spaced arrays are
observed; during this interval even three
arrays are not sufficient to characterize
the temperature field.  However, after 6 h
the measurements indicate that the
difference in the temperature fluctuations
between arrays is small.

     The average rms errors for each
array are summarized in Table 1.  This
analysis suggests that a single array can
measure temperature changes to within
0.04 L/h, which is required to reliably
detect leak rates, of 0.19 L/h.  Because
of the turbulence caused by the physical
disturbance of mixing and by the thermal
settling of the fluid in the tank, the
rms errors calculated for the first 6 h
of each experimental run were excluded
from the analysis.  Due to the presence
of a bad thermistor in  the array, the rms
of Array 3 appears to be somewhat higher
than those of Array 1 or Array 2.
TABLE 1.  AVERAGE RMS* ERROR FOR THREE
          VERTICAL THERMISTOR ARRAYS
    Array 1  	'	  0.041 L/h
    Array 2  ,	  0.039 L/h
    Array 3	  0..046 L/h

       Mean	  0.042 L/h
     * Root Mean Square

     The cumulative rms errors were plot-
ted as a function of .the time of day to
observe any diurnal variations of the rms
error.   An increase of approximately
0.01 L/h in the rms error is observed .
during the 6 h period from 10 a.m. to
4 p.m., coinciding with the period of  .
most rapid change of air temperature.
For the next 18 h, the rms error settles
to a level of approximately 0.038 L/h..

     The third analysis was performed to
investigate whether the 20 cm vertical
separation of thermistors on each array
was adequate to characterize the vertical
distribution of temperature in the tank.
The mathematical coherence was formed
between adjacent pairs of thermistors and
was found to be near unity for frequencies
less than 1 cycle per 2 h.
                                          -167-

-------
     These results have a significant
implication for tank testing.  First,
temperature compensation is essential
to the conduct of an accurate tank test.
Second, independent of structural defor-
mation effects, a waiting period of at
least 4 to 6 h after topping off a par-
tially filled tank with product is re-
quired before testing begins.  Third,
a single array of thermistors, at the
fill hole, is sufficient to obtain the
necessary data for effective temperature
compensation.  The effect of the number
of thermistors, test time, and sample
interval is being quantified by simula-
ting the performance of six canonical
test methods.
PERFORMANCE OF CANONICAL TEST METHODS

     The performance of six canonical
(representative) methods for testing
overfilled tanks is being evaluated
while detailed descriptions of commer-
cially available methods are being
collected and modelled.  These "theo-
retical test methods" invoke sound
operational, data collection, and data
analysis practice.  The implied prac-
tice can readily be incorporated into
commercially available methods.  This
preliminary evaluation will support the
development of performance standards
sooner than would otherwise be possible.
The canonical methods are described as
follows:

o  product level measurements only
   (no temperature measurements);

o  product level and one temperature
   measurement at the center of the ..tank;

o  product level and three temperature
   measurements, volumetrically weighted
   by tank volume, and located at three
   equally spaced vertical intervals;

o  product level and five temperature
   measurements, volumetrically weighted
   by tank volume, and located at five
   equally spaced vertical intervals;

o  product level and the average tempera-
   ture computed from a vertical array of
   twelve equally spaced temperature
   sensors; and
o  product level  and a volume-weighted
   average temperature computed from a
   vertical array of twelve temperature
   sensors.

     Performance will be expressed in
terms of the probability of detection
(PD) and probability of false alarm
(PFA).  PD is the probability that a
given method will detect an actual leak
at or above its threshold rate in an
UST.  PFA is the probability that a
given method will declare that a tank
is leaking at or above its threshold
rate when, in fact, the tank is tight.

     The data for each test method are
collected and processed at a 1 sample/
min rate.  The precision of the height
measurement sensor is assumed to be
0.25 mm (0.01 in.), corresponding to a
volume change of 0.002 L (0.0005 gal).
The temperature sensor precision is
taken to be 0.001°C.  All tank tests are
conducted between 12 and 24 h after
product delivery to a half-filled tank.
The estimated volume rate for each tank
test is calculated by subtracting the
temperature time series from the product
level time series after converting each
to equivalent volume, and fitting a
least squares line to the residual volume.

     Preliminary performance curves that
display PD versus PFA as a function of
leak rate have been generated for each
canonical method and for test periods of
1, 2, 3, and 4 h.  The curves are gener-
ated from a histogram of the temperature
compensated volume fluctuations compiled
using the data from the EPA test appara-
tus.  Typical results of these analyses
are shown in Figure 1 for a canonical
method employing five equally spaced
thermistors in a single array.  The
results presented in this figure  include
only the volume  fluctuations from one
source of ambient noise (thermal  expan-
sion or contraction of the product).
The performance  results indicate  that
temperature compensation is essential
and that performance is improved  with
increased test time and number of ther-
mistors used for temperature compensa-
tion.  Without temperature compensation,
only leak  rates  of at least 4.75  L/h
(1.19 gal/h) are detectable with  a PD
= 0.95 and a PFA = 0.001.
                                           -168-

-------
                                           8
 CO
' o


 NOI133130
                  in
                  o
                     •e
o ^
il
                                               W
                                               K
                                               D
                                o
                                o
          33N3H8nD30 JO
                                    -169-

-------
     The improvement in test method per-
formance when the volume fluctuations are
temperature compensated is reflected in
Table 2.  From this it can be seen that
a 1-h test with a single thermistor
compensation scheme will detect a leak
rate of 0.42 L/h (0.11 gal/h) with a PD
» 0.95 and a PFA = 0.001.  A 2-h test,
however, with temperature compensation
provided by a complete vertical array
that has been volumetrically weighted,
will detect a leak rate of 0.17 L/h
(0.04 gal/h) at this performance level.

     Tests are currently under way to
quantify the magnitude of the volume
changes caused by structural deformation
of the tank and by trapped vapor in the
tank.  When these are complete and more
temperature runs are added to the data
base, a final performance estimate can
be made.  These results should be indi-
cative of the performance that the
technology is capable of achieving.

As part of the experiments completed to
date, a method of measuring the volume
of trapped vapor pockets in any UST  has
been developed to afford estimates of
volume fluctuations produced by a vapor
pocket.  This is an important measurement
because all overfilled tanks trap vapor,
and heretofore there has been no means to
measure the volume of these pockets.
With all proturberances removed, the
tanks of the test apparatus trap approx-
imately 40 L of vapor when overfilled.
These tanks were installed with end  to
end elevation changes of less than
0.6 cm.  Field installations have a
typical elevation difference of 5 cm
and will, therefore, trap larger volumes
of vapor.  As a consequence, the 40  L of
trapped vapor represents a very much
smaller volume of trapped vapor than is
typically found in the field.
TABLE 2.  DETECTABLE LEAK RATE IN LITERS PER HOUR FOR THREE OF THE CANONICAL
          TEST METHODS FOR A PROBABILITY OF DETECTION OF 0.95 AND A PROBABILITY
          OF FALSE ALARM OF 0.001. (This performance estimate includes only the
          volumetric fluctuations caused by product temperature fluctuations.
          A 0.05 gal/h leak rate is equal to a 0.19 L/h leak rate.)
              Canonical Test Method

        One Thermistor  	

        Five Thermistors  	
        Vertical Array, Volumetrically
        Weighted  (12 Thermistors)  ...
      0.32
                                                             Leak Rate (L/h)

                                                             Test Duration
1-h
0.42
0.38
2-h
0.37
0.31
3-h
0.34
0.28
4-h
0.33
0.27
0.17
0.13
0.12
CONCLUSIONS

     Preliminary results from the first
set of ambient noise experiments in the
test apparatus are available.  These early
tests have been conducted to assess the
impact of temperature fluctuations on
testing in overfilled tanks (the most
common condition for volumetric testing).
The initial  results indicate that product
thermal effects are large when the temper-
ature of the added product is different
 from that of the in situ ground and the
 stored product.  During the time period
 immediately after product addition (i.e.,
 the first 4 to 6 h), the temperature
 fluctuations are not horizontally coher-
 ent, so that a single thermistor array
 cannot adequately compensate for thermal
 fluctuations.  After this initial period,
 the horizontal coherence of the long term
 trends is of order one, and a single
 vertical array of thermistors at the fill-
 hole of the tank can provide adequate
                                          -170-

-------
thermal compensation.  Coherence analysis
between pairs of thermistors separated
vertically by 20 cm indicates that this
separation is generally adequate to define
the vertical temperature distribution of
the temperature field in the tank.

     At the same time the experimental
work was being carried out, a theoretical
basis was developed that EPA's Office of
Underground Storage Tanks (OUST) could
use to rapidly assess the performance of
existing test methods, as well as the
performance of any newly developed tests
that might be brought to EPA's attention
in the future.  When presently available
commercial volumetric leak detection
tests that overfill the tank were exa-
mined, the majority were found to fall
into six classes.  For each of these
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     This work was performed for the EPA
under Contract No. 68-03-3255 with
Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, New
Jersey.
REFERENCES

1.  Westat, Inc., Midwest Research Insti-
    tute, Battelle Columbus Division, and
    Washington Consulting Group, 1986.
    Underground Motor Fuel Storage Tanks;
    A National Survey, Vol. 1 Technical
    Report,  EPA 560/5-86-013,  Office of
    Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
    USEPA, Washington D.C.

2.
                                         -171-

-------
         NATO/CCMS PILOT STUDY  ON DEMONSTRATION  OF  REMEDIAL ACTION TECHNOLOGIES
                         FOR  CONTAMINATED  LAND AND  GROUNDWATER

                                           by

                                   Donald  E. Sanning
                         U. S.  Environmental Protection  Agency
                                 Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
                                          and
                                   Robert  Olfenbuttel
                                    U.  S.  Air  Force
                          Tyndall Airforce Base, Florida 32403


                                        ABSTRACT

     Groundwater and soil contamination by hazardous  waste is a  pervasive  problem  in
industrialized countries.  As scarce resources,  water and land must  be returned  to
productive use.  Current cleanup efforts are hampered by limited technology  options
and high costs.  It's desirable to build up the  knowledge base so that more  efficient,
cost effective remedial technologies can be developed.  However, the urgent  needs  of
society require that near-term solutions be found  and applied to the most  significant
pollution problems.  Consequently, promising  new technology must be  tested and
demonstrated to determine their applicability  and  effectiveness  for  today's  problems.

     The U. S. Environmental  Protection Agency has  established a formal program  to
enhance the development and use of new  or innovative  technologies for mitigating the
problems caused by releases of hazardous substances at uncontrolled  hazardous waste
sites.  In the United States the program is called  the Superfund Innovative  Technology
Evaluation or SITE Program.

     In November 1986 the NATO-CCMS formally  adopted  a U. S.  proposal for  a  new  pilot
study entitled "Demonstration of Remedial  Action Technologies  for Contaminated Land  and
Groundwater."  The following NATO countries opted  to  participate:

                             0  Canada
                             0  Denmark
                             0  Federal Republic of Germany
                             0  Greece
                             0  Italy
                             0  The Netherlands
                                          -172-

-------
                              0  Norway
                              0  Spain
                              0  United States

 Two non-NATO countries, Australia and Japan have also, expressed an interest in
 participating.

      The purpose of this new study will  be to field demonstrate and evaluate new
 technology and/or existing systems for remedial  action at uncontrolled  hazardous waste
 sites and is a  logical  international  extension of the U.  S.  EPA,  SITE program.   This
 study will offer the potential  to obtain a multiple data  base  on  various  remedial
 action unit processes,  that is microbial  degradation, on  site  treatment/destruction
 fixation, without any single country  having to commit a disproportional amount  of  its
 internal  resources to a specific research activity.

      Simultaneously, along with the primary demonstration portion  of the  study,  the
 opportunity for long term technology  transfer of environmental  restoration  technology
 development will  be provided to participating countries.

 INTRODUCTION
      The  first working  group meeting was
 hosted  by the Federal Republic of Germany
 on  March  16-20,  1987.   At this meeting
 experts from six countries  (Canada,
 Denmark,  Federal Republic of Germany, the
 Netherlands, Norway, and U.S.A.) agreed
 on  an initial program of 12 demonstra-
 tions of  technologies to clean-up con-
 taminated soils  and groundwater.

      The  sites were selected by a
 majority  vote of all participating
 countries (no country was permitted to
 vote  for  its own sites) after agreement
 that  each interested country would have
 at  least  one site automatically accepted.
 With  this in mind, every attempt was made
 to maximize diversity within the limits
 of the 21 sites from which selections were
 made.  Special emphasis was placed on the
 diversity and innovative aspects
 of the technologies.  Each project is
 expected to have a substantial  data base
 on its application within the 1987
 calendar year.

     The  International  Study Group will
meet twice yearly to review progress on
 each  demonstration  project  and to  consider
 the inclusion  of  further  projects  in the
 program.  The  results  of  the  various pro-
 jects will  be  published in  a  final  "state-
 of-the-art"  report  on  treatment technolo-
 gies  for contaminated  land  and groundwater
 by Plenum Press as  an  official NATO
 report.  Interim  reports  will be published
 in international  journals from time to
 time  as available data warrants.

 Discussion:

      Table 1 is a summary of  the technolo-
 gies  accepted for the  first year of the
 study classified  by country.

      Further details on the sites can be
obtained from the individual  referenced
sources.  It is important to  note that
substantial  results are not yet available
on any of the sites as,the overall  study
 (NATO-CCMS)  was only approved in Novem-
ber of 1986 and the sites selected in
March, 1987.  Twelve site remediation pro-
jects  from six countries were selected for
the first phase of this multi-year infor-
mation exchange project.  The projects can
                                          -173-

-------
                 TABLE 1.   NATO-CCMS Pilot  Study  on  Demonstration  of
                           Remedial  Action  Technologies  for Contaminated
                           Land and  Groundwater
             Country

             Canada

             Denmark


             Germany

             Japan


             Netherlands
             United States
Summary of Technologies

0  Groundwater treatment

0  Groundwater treatment and aerobic/
   anaerobic biological treatment

0  Groundwater treatment, cleaning, and thermal  treatment

0  Thermal treatment followed by calcination
   and mercury recovery

0  Thermal treatment in consort with
   biological treatment
0  In-situ biorestoration
0  Landfarming

0  Electric infrared incineration
0  In-situ biodegradation
0  In-situ soil vapor extraction
be grouped by the type of technology into
the following:

     0  4 in-situ biological treatment
        (Denmark, Germany, Netherlands
        and U.S.A.)

     0  3 thermal treatment (Germany,
        Netherlands and U.S.A.)

     0  2 groundwater treatment (Canada,
        Denmark and Germany)

     0  1 high pressure soil washing
        (Germany)

     0  1 land farming (Netherlands)

     0  1 soil vapor extraction (U.S.A.)

     0  1 chemical treatment (Japan)
               Some of the sites have more than one
               technology to be demonstrated.

               Canada(1)

                    Canada has one site included in the
               study.  The Ville Mercier site is in a
               small community located on the south shore
               of the St. Lawrence River, about 20 km
               southwest of the city of Montreal.  Ground-
               water is a significant source of supply for
               the potable water needs of the local popu-
               lation.

                    From 1968 to 1972, some 40,000 m3
               of waste oils and liquid industrial wastes
               from chemical and petrochemical industries
               in the Montreal area were dumped into a
               lagoon in an old gravel pit located several
               kilometres southeast of Ville Mercier.  In
               October 1971, it was discovered that
                                           -174-

-------
 several wells  in the vicinity were
 contaminated.  The dump site was closed
 in  1972, and it was estimated that
 20,000 m3 of wastes remained in the
 lagoons.  Sampling conducted by the
 Quebec Ministry of the Environment
 (MENVIQ) revealed the presence of phenols
 and chlorinated organic compounds in the
 groundwater in the area.  Subsequent
 studies indicated that approximately
 30  km2 of the  aquifer had become contam-
 i nated.

     Four specific zones of contamination
 were delineated.  The first two, where
 the groundwater was highly contaminated,
 occurred within 2 km of the source.  More
 than 80 organic compounds were identified
 in  zone 1.  The principal  contaminants
 were phenols, trichloroethylene, dichlor-
 ethane, trichloromethane, trichloroethane,
 chlorobenzene, dichloroethylene and
 Arochlor 1254.  Two other zones of lesser
 contamination were delineated with a
 total areal extent of contamination
 estimated at about 30 km2.

     In addition to the inconvenience
 caused to the population and the loss of
 a water resource to thousands of people,
the direct cost in this case of ground-
water contamination may reach ten million
dollars (Cdn) or eight million U.S.

     A program to rehabilitate the aqui-
 fer was started by the Government of
Quebec in 1981.  The liquid material
which was stored in the lagoon was first
 removed (incineration, landfill)  in order
to prevent additional  contamination of
the groundwater.  Following this, MENVIQ
awarded contracts to develop a purge-well
system and to design and construct a
 groundwater treatment facility.

     The pumping system consists  of three
 (3) extraction wells located a few hun-
dred meters downstream of  the hazardous
waste  dump  site.  These wells create a cone
of depression into which contaminated
groundwater is drawn, i.e., it forms a
hydraulic trap;

Denmark(2)

     Denmark has one site included in the
study.  The Skrydstrup special deposit site
was formerly a gravel pit which was later
used for the disposal of chemical/indus-
trial waste.  Some of this waste was stored
in several  hundred drums at the site.
There has been extensive chemical, geologi-
cal and hydrogeological investigations
conducted at Skrydstrup since 1986.  Tri-
chloroethane, trichloroethylene, paint and
acid wastes have resulted in groundwater
pollution.  The remedial action will  con-
sist of digging up, removal and off-
site disposal of several hundred drums,
followed by groundwater pumping and treat-
ing and on-site aerobic/anaerobic
biological treatment of the polluted soil.
This remedial action is active at the
current time.

     The remedial  action program
of the Danish National  Agency of Environ-
mental Protection will  involve 4 actual
sites where remedial  actions are enforced
by the environmental  authorities and is
budgeted at 3,890,000 DKK or about $220,000 U.S.

Federal Republic of Germany(3)

     The FRG has 3 sites included in the
study, they are as follows:

0    The Pintsch-uil  Site(3) - is located
in an industrial  estate of West Berlin.
The recovery of used  oils has been carried
out since 1924.   Residual  products were
left in several  pits  and subsequently
seeped into the soil  arid groundwater.
After initial inspection of the company in
1976 the water authorities in charge
directed that groundwater samples
                                         -175-

-------
be taken.  Based on the considerable
pollution detected in the groundwater, it
was directed that a supplemental project
be initiated with the objective of ground-
water sanitation.

     In the autumn of 1984 a pilot plant
to purify the contaminated groundwater
was planned.  The objective of this
plant was to compile techniques of
groundwater purification adapted to the
special contamination detected here.
The construction of this plant was
entrusted to Messr. Harbauer, Engineer-
ing Office for Environmental Technology,
Berlin.

     At first the site was thoroughly
investigated and then 3 clearing wells,
having a maximum capacity of 40 m3/h at
25 m WC, were first designed.

     A preliminary pollutant analyses of
groundwater samples indicate extensive
contamination with a wide variety of
organic compounds.  Results showed
concentration for:
  hydrocarbons
  oils
  phenols
up to
up to
up to
16,000 mg/1
 1,000 mg/1
   225 mg/1
In addition to the dissolved and undis-
solved oils and their compounds,
groundwater contamination is primarily
caused by volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), and chlorinated hydrocarbons.
The analytic measuring values were the
basis for the construction of a pilot
plant to purify ground and seeping water
on site.

     This pilot plant has a capacity of
40 m^/h and consists of oil separator,
flotation, counter-current desorption
with exhaust purification and active
carbon purification.
     Another major part of this  remedial
activity will involve full-scale
cleaning of the contaminated soils
scheduled to begin in March 1987.   No
data are currently available on  this  part
of the clean-up effort.

0    The scrap metal  site in the Chariot-
tenberg area of Berlin^3/ is contami-
nated with cyanide, arsenic, cadmium,
mercury, PCB, lead, volatile chlorinated
hydrocarbons, and oil.  Remedial operations
have been active since December, 1986 and
consist of high pressure soils washing.
A Netherlands company, Klockner Oecotec
GMHB, has used this high pressure  soils wash-
ing process to clean 100,000 tonnes of
contaminated soils and removed over 95%  of
the pollutants.  High pressure water jets
are used to physically strip off hydrocarbons
and heavy metal residues from the  soils.
This process is particularly promising for
sandy/gravelly soils but is less effective for
clays.

0    The coke oven site at Unna-Boenen,
Notherhine, Westphalia is contaminated with
aromatic hydrocarbons  , tars and acid
resins.  Volatile organic compounds comprise
5% of the waste, by weight.  The site is
estimated to be 230,000 square meters in
area.   It represents a number of similar
sites throughout the FRG.

     A  variety of technologies will be
applied to the site, individually  focused
on the  soil  and aqueous phases of the
contamination.  A 50 ton per hour,
transportable thermal  unit will be used to
process the  soil and redeposit it  on-site.
The unit has been successfully pilot tested
on similarly contaminated soils at a 7 ton
per hour rate with a destruction effectiveness
of approximately 98%.  In addition, in situ
enhanced indigenous microbial degradation
is underway, using nitrate as an electron
acceptor.  For contaminated water, a
                                           -176-

-------
combination of air stripping, floccula-
tion, sedimentation and filtration are
under consideration.

The Netherlands(4)

     The Netherlands has 3 sites included
in the study, which are as follows:

0    The contaminated soil at the former
gasworks site in the Province of Zurd,
Rotterdam, will be excavated and trans-
ported to the thermal destruction in-
stallation of Ecotechniek.  The soil  is
contaminated primarily with polynuclear
aromatics (PNA's) and complexed cyanides
(ferri-ferro cyanides) caused by spillages
and dumping of waste materials.  The  in-
stallation of Ecotechniek B.V. has been
selected for evaluation because it has the
highest 'production1 of cleaned soil  in the
Netherlands (over 300,000 m3).  Although
the installation has proven to be appli-
cable in that it removes and destroys
many types of contaminants (oil, PNA's,
aromatics, cyanides) from soil, there is
a need to assess more accurately the
relation between type of contaminated
soil, process conditions and treatment
results (including air emissions).

     The installation consists primarily
of an internally heated rotating kiln
(direct heat transfer) and an after-
burner for the off gases; these operate
at a maximum temperature level of 550°C
and 1100°C respectively.

     Main purposes of the demonstration
project are:

  a.  Evaluation of the treatment re-
      sults of the above described
      thermal installation for cleaning
      of soil from a former gasworks
      site.
  b.  To obtain insight into the start-
      up and reliability.problems at
      or about $115,000 U.S. soil
     treatment plants in a general
     sense.

     The evaluation which is planned
to start in May 1987.  The evaluation
follows the approach developed by ('A Standard
Method for Evaluating Soil
Decontamination Techniques - a First
Outline').  It is planned to evaluate the
installation during periods of two days each,
in which fluctuations in process conditions
and type of contaminated soil should be
kept at a minimum.

     Three periods will be evaluated:
1.   Normal (or standard) process
     conditions and moderately contam-
     inated soil
2.   Normal process conditions and
     highly contaminated soil
3.   Deviating process conditions (high
     temperature) and moderately contam-
     inated soil.

In all cases use is made of soil with a
rather high peat (humus) and clay
content.

     During the evaluation attention
will be given to:

0  Gaseous emissions (CxHy, HCN, S02, NOX,
   dust)

0  Characteristics of the contaminated soil
   (feed) and the cleaned soil  (product),
   such as particle size distribution,
   free-CN, total-CN, PNA's, aromatics.
   Depending on the homogeneity of feed  and
   product, 8 to 20 soil samples will be
   analyzed.  The soil  samples  will  also be
   subjected to leaching tests  and bio-
   assays.

   °    The Asten Site in the province of Noord-
   Brabant is a petro (gasoline) station,
   where the soil is contaminated with petro
   containing small  amounts of  lead, and a
   small quantity of diesel oil.  The contami-
                                         -177-

-------
nation is caused by a leaking tank of the
petrol station.  At least 30,000 liters of
normal gasoline have leaked and about 400
cubic meters of soil have been contami-
nated.

     This project is aimed at optimizing
the treatment of deeper layers of con-
taminated soil by enhancing in situ
microbial activity.  The development of
in situ techniques is important for the
reclamation of other sites similar to
gasoline stations.  It is expected that
the use of this technique will result in
cost reduction since it will avoid costs
for excavation and allow the petrol
station to continue its operation.

     The project is being carried with
the cooperation of the RIVM (National
Institute of Public Health and Environ-
mental Hygiene) and the TNO (Netherlands
Organization for Appled Scientific
Research).  Funding support is provided
by the Ministry of VROM (Housing, Physical
Planning and Environmental Hygiene).

0    The third site submitted by the
Netherlands is the Wijster site in the
province of Drenthe.  This site is the
former location of a waste disposal
company.  The primary emphasis will be
on improving landfarming methods for the
bio-destruction of gasoil, crude oil and
halogenated hydrocarbons (for example,
hexachlorocyclohexane).

     Contaminated soil will be excavated
and spread over a drained sand bed.  The
sand bed will be isolated from the sub-
soils by a plastic membrane.  Nutrients
Will be added and the contaminated soils
will be covered by an oxygen permeable
plastic membrane or plants to prevent
erosion.
     Japan has one site included in the
study.  Because no representative from
Japan attended the March site selection
meeting, this activity must still  be
considered tentative.  Until  confirmation
is received from the Japanese Environ-
mental Agency - National Institute of
Environmental Studies - discussion on
their site will be limited to reporting
that it's a former electro-chemical
industry site where the remedial  action
will involve thermal/ chemical  treatment and
recovery of mercury in contaminated soils.

United States(6)

     The U.S.A. has three sites included in
the study.  They are as follows:

0    Peak Oil, Tampa, Florida.   The Peak
Oil site is a former facility used by an
oil re-refiner.  A former waste lagoon
contaminated with oil re-refining waste
containing PCB's and lead is contaminating
the local groundwater supply.  The facility
has been inactive.  In 1984, investigation
began to characterize the type  and extent
of cleanup.

     Remedial investigations conducted  at
the Peak Oil site determined that the waste
lagoon was a source of PCB and  lead con-
tamination.  Because of contamination to
the local groundwater supply, it was
necessary to remove the source  of contami-
nation.  The soil in the area is sandy  and
the groundwater table is very near the
surface.  The lagoon has been drained of
water and sand, soil and lime have been
mixed with the lagoon contents  to further
adsorb any water and neutralize the acidic
waste.  The lagoon was contaminated with
acetic acid that was used in the re-
refining process.  These materials were
mixed in place by a bulldozer to obtain a
homogeneous, dry material.  The level of
PCB's measured was less than 50 ppm.  Lead
has been measured at 10-15 ppm.

     Based upon the waste and the oil-soil
matrix present at the site, thermal de-
destruction technology was selected for the
                                           -178-

-------
cleanup of the waste lagoon.  In May of
1986 the Shirco Infrared Systems pilot
incinerator was brought to Peak Oil  for
a test burn of the PCB contaminated
soil.  This test indicated that the
Shirco infrared technology was an
acceptable thermal destruction techno-
logy for the waste present at this site.

     The infrared incineration system
consists of a continuous conveyor belt
furnace with associated material feed
and discharge systems, process control
and instrumentation equipment, emission
control systems, and heating element
power center.  This system is mounted on
transportable trailers.  Hazardous
material is conveyed to the furnace as
sludges or solid wastes.  The feed
material drops onto a metering conveyor
located at the feed end of the furnace.
The metering belt is synchronized with
the furnace conveyor screw which dis-
tributes the material across the width
of the metering belt.  Material enters
the furnace through a rotary airlock.

     The material then moves through
the furnace where it is exposed to
infrared radiation in multiple
temperature-controlled zones.  Zone
temperatures are controlled by vary-
ing the input power (electric) to
maintain preset zone setpoint tempera-
tures.  As the material moves through
the furnace on the belt, it is exposed
to the thermal environment necessary for
oxidation  of volatiles and solid
organics.  This technology is primarily
applicable to solids, sludges and con-
taminated  soils.  The technology is also
applicable to both organic and inorganic
waste streams.

0    Eglin Air Force Base.  This jet fuel
spill site is near the city of Fort
Walton Beach in Florida.   In  1984 a
large area of dead grass appeared in the
base petroleum storage area.  The smell
of fuel  indicated that an underground fuel
leak had occurred.  Pressure testing of
underground fuel  lines revealed the source
of the spill, a one liter per minute leak
in a 15 cm diameter pipeline.  The duration
of the leak is unknown; however, soil and
groundwater sampling indicates that as much
as 100,000 liters of jet fuel have contami-
nated 6000 - 8000 cubic meters of soil and
shallow groundwater.

     After the spill was discovered, local
authorites characterized the extent of
contamination and established a series of
shallow trenches to recover the free
product.  During 1985 over 30,000 liters,
of jet fuel were recovered using skimmer
pumps.  In October of 1986, the Air Force
Engineering and Services Laboratory initi-
ated a full-scale research project at the
site to study enhanced biodegradation
methods for removing fuel residuals from
soil and groundwater.

     Surface and underground spills of jet
fuel are the most common source of soil and
groundwater contamination at U. S. Air
Force bases.  As a result, the Air Force
Engineering and Services Laboratory is
investigating cost effective methods for
decontaminating fuel saturated soils and
impacted groundwaters.  In-situ biodegra-
dation provides a method of eliminating
fuel residuals from the unsaturated zone
and  removing a long-term threat to the
groundwater.             ,

     The degradation of petroleum hydro-
carbons has been extensively studied over
the  last 25 years" and is well understood
in the laboratory.  However, extensive data
on full-scale field studies is seldom
available or published and much of the
experience  rests with experts who have a finan-
cial interest in the technology.  The goals
of this site demonstration will be to
generate new data on the in-situ degrada-
tion of specific jet fuel components, to
optimize nutrient/oxygen additions, and
                                          -179-

-------
to maximize contact between nutrients,
soil microbes and fuel soaked soils.
The study will be conducted over a two-
year period to provide information on the
lower limits of biological removal of
fuel compounds.  A control area has been
established in a fuel contaminated area
on the upgradient end of the site.  The
purpose of this control area will be to
compare natural levels of degradation to
the enhancement provided by nutrient/
oxygen additions.

     The total cost of this site demon-
stration is $780,000.  Of this total,
approximately 50% is for design and oper-
ation of the system, 25% is for sampling
and analysis, 15% is for nutrients and
hydrogen peroxide and 10% is for well
installation and delivery equipment.
More precise cost information will be
available when the project is fully
operational.

0    Vernona Well Field.  The Verona
Well Field site consists of several
distinct contaminated areas within
approximately 100 acres.  The well field
itself contains 30 production wells that
supply the entire city of Battle Creek,
Michigan, including several major busi-
nesses.  The site also includes a rail-
road marshalling yard and two solvent
facilities.  The Thomas Solvent Raymond
Road (TSRR) facility is a former solvent
repackaging and distribution facility.
Solvents were stored in 21 underground
storage tanks which were later discovered
to be leaking.  The TSRR facility is
located about one mile upgradient of the
well field.  It is primarily a residen-
tial area surrounded by a few businesses.

     The contamination problem at the
Verona Field site was first discovered
in August 1981, during routine testing
of the city's water supply.  Volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) were discovered in
10 of the production wells.  An area-wide
survey by the U. S. EPA Technical  Assis-
tance Team (TAT) in the Spring of 1982
determined that the TSRR facility was  a
potential major source of well field con-
tamination.  This was confirmed during
remedial investigation activities.  Chlor-
inated hydrocarbons are the most signifi-
cant environmental contaminants.
Groundwater and soil contamination within
the TSRR facility was found with VOCs  as
high as 100,000 and 1,000,000 ppb respec-
tively.  The total estimated mass of
organics in groundwater and soil at TSRR
was 440 Ib. and 1,700 lb., respectively.

     A two-stage approach to remedial
action at the TSRR facility was adopted.
Each assembled remedial alternative evalu-
ated included separate but related alter-
natives for groundwater and soil.  The
selected alternative for the site includes
a groundwater extraction (GWE) system in
conjunction with a soil vapor extraction
(SVE) system.  Due to the significant
mass of contaminants in the soil, alter-
natives that employed both groundwater and
soil remediation were developed.  Several
alternatives for soil cleanup were evalu-
ated, including SVE, excavation with
on/off-site disposal, site capping, soil
washing  (saturating the unsaturated zone
with water extraction), and no action.

     The key components of the SVE system
are extraction wells screened primarily in
the unsaturated zone and a vapor phase
activated carbon treatment vessel.  The
entire system will be closed (piping will
lead directly from the extraction wells to
the carbon system).  A performance goal of
10 ppm total VOCs in the unsaturated zone
was established.  At present, eight ex-
traction wells are envisioned.  Due to the
innovative nature of the SVE system, the
U.S. EPA has adopted a formal two-step
procurement approach for both SVE design
and construction.  Technical proposals
for the  design will be solicited, then
cost proposals will be evaluated only
                                          -130-

-------
for those bidders submitting acceptable
technical proposals.  However, at a
minimum, five extraction wells followed
by vapor phase carbon treatment will  be
part of the system.

Summary and Conclusions

     The NATO-CCMS pilot study program
provides an excellent forum for an
international exchange of current,
state-of-the-art, scientific information
pertinent to environmental protection.
One of the challenges in modern society
is dealing with the byproducts resulting
from manufacturing.  Throughout the
world, improper handling and disposal
of hazardous materials and hazardous
waste has caused both groundwater and
soil contamination.  This is especially
true in industrialized countries.  Water
and land are scarce resources, and must
be returned to productive use.  Current
cleanup efforts are hampered by limited
disposal sites, and high cost.  It has
not been proved that land disposal,
particularly landfill ing of hazardous
waste, is effective over the long term in
containing hazardous wastes.  Immediate
solutions must be found and applied to
the most serious pollution problems.
Promising new treatment technologies  must
be tested and then demonstrated to see if
they apply to, and will be effective  for
today's pollution problems.  We must
build a knowledge base so that more
efficient, cost effective remedial
technologies can be developed.  This
knowledge base must include "lessons    "•>
learned" from the past.  A knowledge  of
technical and economic limitations, or
failures, of the various technologies is
as beneficial as the details of
successes.  Through the exchange of
information on emerging remedial
technologies, nations may pool their
knowledge and experience and make the best
use of their own limited resources.
Acknowledgements

1.   The plenary meeting group of the NATO-
     CCMS for approving the study.  They
     were as follows:

          0  Canada
          0  Denmark
          0  Federal Republic of Germany
          0  Greece
          0  Italy
          0  Netherlands
          0  Norway
          0  Spain
          0  United States

2.   Special recognition to Mr. Allen
     Si el en, NATO-CCMS Coordinator for
     the Office of International Activ-
     ities, U. S. EPA, Washington, DC
     for his consultation and assistance
     in getting the study adopted.

3.   Mr. A. James Barnes, Deputy Adminis-
     trator, U. S. EPA for chairing the
     U. S. Delegation at the time of
     adoption of the Study.

4.   All the members of the first working
     group-site selection meeting for their
     presentations and technical input.
     They are in alphabetical order as
     follows:

       Jan Willem Assink, TNO, P.O. Box
          342, 7300 AH Apeldoorn, The
          Netherlands.
       Danna Borg, Ministry of Environ-
          ment, Strandgade 29, Denmark.
       Dr. Heinz-Jurgen Brauch, Engler-
          Bunte-Institute of the Univer-
          sity of Karlsruhe, D-7500
          Karlsruhe 1, Richard-Willstatter-
          Allee 5 Federal Republic of
          Germany.
       Winfried Brull, Klockner Oecotec,
          4100 Duisburg, Nendorfer Str
          3-5, Federal Republic of
                                          -181-

-------
   Germany.
Douglas C. Downey, USAF Engi-
   neering and Service Center,
   AFESC/RDV Tyndall AFB, FL
   32403, USA.
Schmid Ernst, LFU, Benzstrasse
   5, Germany.
Dr. Jurgen Fortmann, Ruhrkohle
   Umwelttechnik, 4300 Essen
   15, Federal Republic of
   Germany.
Dr. Volker Franzius, Umwelt-
   bundesamt, Bismarckplatz 1,
   D-1000 Berlin 33, Federal
   Republic of Germany.
Peter Fuhrmann, Landesanstalt
   fur Umweltschutz, Gries-
   bachstr 3, Federal Republic
   of Germany.
Dr. Heimhard, Hans-Jurgen,
   Klockner Oecotec Gmah, D 41
   Duisburg, Neudorfer Str. 3-5,
   Federal Republic of Germany.
Morten Helle, State Pollution
   Control Authority, Box 8100
   DEP, N-0032 OSL01, Norway.
Morten Hinseveld, TNO-Apeldoorn,
   Box 342, Apeldoorn, Holland.
Stephen C. James, U. S. Environ-
   mental Protection Agency,
   26 West St. Clair Street,
   Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., U. S.
   Environmental Protection
   Agency, 401 M Street, S. W.,
   Washington, DC 20460, USA.
Manfred Nussbaumer, Ed. Zublin
   AG, albstadt Weg 3, 7000
   Stattgart 80, Federal Republic
   of Germany.
Joachim Ronge, Ruhrkohle Umwel-
   ttechnik, Rellinghauser Str.
   1, D-4300 Essen, Federal
   Republic of Germany.
Jim Schmidt, Environment-Canada,
   Wastewater Technology Center,
   867 Lakeshore Road, burlington,
   ONT, L7R4A6, Canada.
 Dr. Seng, Hansjorg, Land Baden-
    Wurttemberg, 75 Karlsruhe,
    Griesbach Str. 3, Federal
    Reppublic of Germany.
 Geroges Simard, Environment  -
    Quebec, 3900 rue Marly, Quebec,
    Glx4E4, Canada.
 Michael Alan Smith, (HMRC),  Bostock
    Hill & Rigby, 288 Windsor Street
    Birmingham, B74DW, UK,  (o)
    021-359-5951 (Birmingham).
 Esther'Soczo, RIVM, P.O. Box 1,
    3720 BA, Bilthoven, The
    Netherlands.
 Klaus Stief, Umweltbundesamt,
    Bismarckplatz 1, D-1000 Berlin
    33, Federal Republic of Germany.
 Becker Thomas, Ministry of Environ-
    ment, Denmark, Hogstorgdell 25,
    2100 0, Denmark.
 Peter Walter Werner, DVGW-forschung-
    sstelle am Engler-Bunte-Institute
    der Universitat Karlsruhe,
    D 7500 Karlsruhe 1, Federal
    Republic of Germany.

References

1.  Schmidt, J., 1987 "Aquifer Decontam-
    ination for Toxic Organics - The
    Case Study of Ville Mercier, Quebec,
    Canada," Wastewater Technology Centre,
    Environment Canada, P.O.  Box 5050,
    Burlington, Ontario, Canada L7R 4A6.

2.  Borg, D., 1987 "Skrydstrup Special
    Deposit, Province of Ribe," Ministry
    of Environment, National  Agency of
    Environmental Protection, Strandgade
    29, 1401 Copenhagen K, Denmark.

3.  Werner, W., 1987 "The Sanitation of
    the Pintsch Site," Harbauer & Co.,
    Ingenieurboro fur Unwelttechnik,
    Bismarckstrasse 10-12, 1000 Berlin
    12, Federal Republic of Germany.

    Site 1 - Pintsch - nil
                                          -182-

-------
    Site 2  -  Scrap  metal site at
    Charlottenberg  Heimhard,
    Klockner-Decotec  GmDH,
    Nuudorfer Str.  3-5
    D-4100  Duisburg 1,  Federal
    Republic  of Germany

    Site 3  -  Coke oven  site  at
    Unna •?  Boenen,  Northrhine,
    Westphalia
    Krauss, Ruhrkohle Aktiengesell-
    schaft, Abteilung P7,  Postfach
    10 32 62, D-4300  Essen 1,
    Federal Republic  of Germany

4.  Site 1  -  Gasworks Site,  Province
    of Zuid,  Nedtherlands  Assink  J.W.,
    TNO, P.O. Box 342,  7300  AH
    Ape!doom, The  Netherlands

    Site 2 -  Asten  Site, Province of
    Noord-Brabant,  Netherlands Soczo
    E. RIVM,  P.O.  Box 1, 3720 BA,
    Bilthoven, The  Netherlands

    Site 3 -  Wejster Site, Province
    of Drenthe Soczo E. RIVM, P.O.
    Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven,
    The Netherlands

5.  Gotoh S.  and Ikeguchi  T., National
    Institute for Environmental  Studies,
    Japan Environmental Agency  Yatabe-
    machi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki  305  Japan.

6.  Site 1 - Peak Oil,  Florida.   James
    S., U. S. EPA,  26 W. St. Clair St.
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 USA.

    Site 2 - Eglin Air Force Base, Florida
    Downey D. C., USAF Engineering and
    Service Center, AFESC/RDV,  Tyndall
    AFB, Florida 32403 USA.

    Site 3 - Verona Well Field,  Battle
    Creek, Michigan.  James S.  U. S.  EPA,
    26 W.  St. Clair Street, Cincinnati,
    Ohio 45268 USA.
                                          -183-

-------
              REACTIVITY OF VARIOUS GROUTS TO HAZARDOUS WASTES AND LEACHATES

                            Andrew Bodocsi and Mark T. Bowers
                    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
                                 University of Cincinnati
                                 Cincinnati,  Ohio  45221

                                         ABSTRACT

     A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the potential of selected grouts for
controlling the percolation of leachates from hazardous solid waste landfills or hazardous
waste ponds.  In the course of the study, seven different grouts were subjected to perme-
ability tests and three of the grouts were tested for their reactivity by an immersion
type test.  Eight different chemicals, some with two concentrations, and two real-site
wastes were used as permeants in the permeability tests, and as liquids for the immersion
baths.

     Of the seven grouts, the acrylate, cement-bentonite (mix 2), and urethane grouts had
the lowest baseline permeabilities with water, ranging from 2.3 x 10~10 to 3.6 x 10"9
era/sec.

     During permeability testing with chemicals, the acrylate grout exhibited excellent
resistance to the paint and refinery wastes, 25% acetone, 25% methanol, and sodium hydrox-
ide, performed satisfactorily With cupric sulfate; ethylerie glycol, and xylene, and was
seriously damaged by aniline, 100% acetone, hydrocholoric acid, and 100% methanol.

     The permeability of the cement-bentonite (mix 2) grout was tested with acetone,
aniline, cupric sulfate, hydrochloric acid, inethanol, arid sodium hydroxide.  With every
one of these chemicals the permeability of the grout improved, ultimately reaching a
practically impervious state.

     The urethane grout maintained its low permeability with acetone, aniline, ethylene
glycol, methanol, paint waste, refinery waste, and hydrochloric acid and it performed
marginally well with cupric sulfate.  However, the urethane lost its low permeability
with sodium hydroxide and xylene.

     Based on the comparision of permeability and reactivity test results, a scheme was
proposed to correlate the permeability changes of grouts to the weight and consistency
changes that may occur during their reactivity testing.
INTRODUCTION

     One of the major environmental prob-
lems facing the nation is the threat of
contamination of groundwater from leaking
hazardous waste landfills and leachate
ponds.  If a waste site is underlain by an
impervious stratum, the most cost-effective
remedy may be using a cutoff slurry wall
constructed around the site and keyed into
the aquielude.  However, if there is no
impervious stratum below the waste, the
remedy may be the construction of a bottom
seal created by injection grouting, in
conjunction with a vertical  slurry wall.
Alternately, both the bottom seal and side
wall may be made by injection grouting.

     Injection grouting has  been used for
many years for stabilizing soils, to pro-
                                           -184-

-------
 vide cutoff  curtains  under dams,  for
 stabilizing  tunnels,  and  more  recently  it
 was proposed for containment of hazardous
 waste (2,3).

      When constructing an impervious bar-
 rier by injection grouting under  a  waste
 site, the grout  must  thoroughly penetrate
 the soil. After .expelling the waste from
 the voids the grout must  set and  harden in
 the soil. In addition, the hardened grout
 must provide a durable impervious seal;even
 when permeated by hazardous leachate.

      The purpose of this  study was  to test
 the permeability and  reactivity of  selected
 grouts with  ten  chemicals to determine!if
 the grouts had the durability  to withstand
 the typical  hazardous waste site  environ-
 ment, arid thus could  be considered  for
 horizontal seal  construction.

      The permeability test results  indicate
 that certain grout-chemical combinations
 caused the deterioration  of the permeabil-
 ity of the grout, while others resulted in
; little or no detrimental  changes.  The
 reactivity test  results show what effect
 chemical baths had on grout samples; some
 combinations caused weight gains, others
 weight losses, and still  others caused  no
 changes.  In addition, changes in sample
 consistency  were observed. The combined
 analysis of  the two tests resulted  in
 correlations that allow prediction  of
 permeability changes  from reactivity test
 results.                              ;

 MATERIALS AND METHODS

      All permeability tests and most
 reactivity tests were conducted on grouted
 soil samples.  The permeability testing
 was conducted in specially constructed,
 permeameters and safe environmental boxes,
 using selected chemicals as the permeants.
 The reactivity samples were tested by
 their immersion in selected chemical biaths.

 Grouts
      In the typical batch of the cement-
 bentonite (mix 1) grout 3000 g Type III
 cement, 120 g bentonite, and 6000 ml water-
 was used, resulting in a water-cement ratio
 of 2.0.  The batches of cement-bentonite
 (mix 2) grout were made up of 3000 g MC-500
 microfine cement, 120 g bentonite, 30 ml
 dispersant, and 2250 g water, yielding a
 water-cement ratio of 0.86.  For ease of
injection, pea gravel was used as the soil
with both grouts.

     The sodium silicate grout selected was
SIROC 132, distributed by Raymond Inter-
national, Inc.  It consisted of 60% modi-
fied silicate, 25% water, 10% formamide,
and 5% calcium chloride.  A fine Mason's
sand was used as the soil to avoid synere-
sis.  Later extensions to the work included
a glyoxal-modified sodium silicate grout
and a sodium aluminate-modified sodium
silicate grout in order to reduce the
permeability of these grouts.

     The urethane grout selected was CR360,
a product of the 3M Company.  A mixture of
89.2% water, 5.7% CR361 (gel inhibitor),
and 5.1% CR360 (urethane polymer solution)
was chosen.  A silica sand was used with
this grout.

     AC-400, distributed by Avanti Inter-
national, was chosen to represent the
acrylate grouts.  A mixture of 73.44%
water, 24.99% AC-400, 0.74% triethanolamine
(catalyst), 0.74% ammonium persulfate (ini-
tiator), and 0.074% potassium ferricyanide
(inhibitor) was used.  Silica sand was used
as the soil.

Grouting Procedure

     The soil samples for the permeability
tests were pressure grouted in a 75 mm
inside diameter plastic mold.  Sample
lengths could be varied as required.  At
least two pore volumes of grout were pass-
ed through the samples before completing
the grouting process.

     The 25.4 mm diameter by 25.4 mm high
cylindrical reactivity samples were prepar-
ed in acrylic molds by first placing the
sand in the molds and tamping the surface
to densify it.  The grout was then injected
continuously from the bottom of each sample
using a syringe.  The cement-bentonite
grout was poured into the molds, since
these samples were prepared without a soil.

Permeameters

     The permeameters used were flexible-
wall type, specially built in-house to re-
sist the chemicals and grouts.  The ele-
ments in contact with the chemicals were
made of one of the following:  nylon,
stainless steel, PVC or teflon.
                                           -185-

-------
Permeability Measuring Apparatuses
Research Facility (1).
     The percolation of the leachates
through the grouted soil samples was
performed in two permeability apparatuses
that were housed in vented boxes utilizing
a one-pass air system to remove any
hazardous vapors.  They had a total
capacity of thirty testing stations.
Each station had regulated chamber and
driving pressures, and means to measure
either leachate outflow only, or both
inflow and outflow.

Permeability Testing

     Since the main objective of the
study was to investigate the effect of
the various chemical leachates on the
permeability of the grouts and compare
them with permeabilities established with
water, the first step was to permeate the
samples with deionized water until
equilibrium baseline permeabilities were
reached.  After that, the samples were
permeated with their respective chemical
leachates until an equilibrium permeability
was established and a minimum of 2.0 pore
volumes of chemical had passed through
each sample.

Reactivity Testing

     ASTH Standard C267-82 "Standard Test
Method for Chemical Resistance of Mortars,
Grouts and Monolithic Surfacings" was
followed as guidance for the preparation,
weighing, measuring and immersion of the
specimens in the selected chemicals.
Observations and weighings were made
after 1, 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 days of
immersion.  Plots were made illustrating
the percent change in weight versus time
for each sample and replicate series.

Chemicals and Hazardous Leachates Used

     For this study, ten representative
chemicals were selected.  Eight of these
organic and inorganic compounds represent
a particular functional group as set
forth in (3), and consisted of acetone,
aniline, cupric sulfate, ethylene glycol,
hydrochloric acid, methanol, sodium
hydroxide and xylene.  In addition, a
real-site refinery waste and a real-site
paint waste were included in the testing
program, which were obtained as leachates
from lysimeter studies conducted at the
Center Hill Solid and Hazardous Waste
     The chemical concentrations used
were:  acetone (100% and 25%), aniline
(100%), cupric sulfate (20% and '10%),
ethylene glycol  (100% and 25%), hydro-
chloric acid (IN and 4N), methanol (100%
and 25%), sodium hydroxide (25% and
10%), and xylene (100%).  The real-site
wastes used were unaltered.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Permeability Test Results With Mater

     Three of the grouts tested had very
low baseline permeabilities with water:
acrylate (k = 5.1 x 10"10 cm/sec),
cement-bentonite (mix 2) (k = 2.3 x 10"10
cm/sec), and urethane (k = 3.6 x 10~9
cm/sec).  The other four grouts tested had
permeabilities with water that exceeded
1 x 10~7 cm/sec.

Permeability Test Results For Acrylate
Grout With Chemicals

     Figure 1 illustrates in a bar chart
form the overall permeability changes of
acrylate grout with ten selected chemi-
cals.  On the left vertical  axis of the
chart permeability is plotted on a log
scale.  Along the horizontal  axis the
chart is subdivided into ten boxes, each
representing one of the ten chemicals.
On the right vertical axis the equilib-
rium permeabilities of the acrylate
grout samples with water are indicated.
Each shaded bar represents the average
changes in the permeability of the grout
with one of the chemicals.  Each bar
starts at the equilibrium permeability
of the grout with water, and may go up
or down, or remain unchanged, depending
on the reaction of the grout with the
specific chemical.  In most cases the
bar first rises to a dashed line that
represents the permeability of the grout
at the first peak of its permeability
with flow.  The bar may rise further and
terminate at a permeability level  that
corresponds to the final  equilibrium
permeability of the grout with the
specific chemical.  The number on each
line gives the number of pore volumes of
chanical which flowed through the sample
before it reached the indicated equilibrium
permeability.

     As shown in the bar chart, the acry-
                                           -136-

-------
                 10'
                  1-4-
                      42pv
            u
            QJ
            cn
            u
                 10
                  r6..
            JQ
            ra
            ID

            £L
            OJ
            Q.
, I 	 , 	 . 	 1 	
I
1
34DV
I
I
1
^
1
I
p. Spy
//
i
\
>
I
1
\

i
m
Q.2DV
10.8
\
V •
k
                                                                             j-i
                                                                             ro
                              r)
                              •|H
                              C.

                              •rH
                             - >H
                              .^^

                              CT
                              UJ
           Figure 1.  Permeability of acrylate grout with various chemicals.
late grout exhibited excellent resistance
to real-site paint and refinery wastes,
and to 25% sodium hydroxide.  Its perfor-
mance was satisfactory with 20% cupric
sulfate, 100% ethylene glycol and xylene.
The aniline, 100% acetone, 4N hydrochlo-
ric acid, and 100% methanol were very
detrimental to the permeability of this
grout.  The permeability of the grout
decreased with the introduction of 25%
sodium hydroxide, however, since the flow,
volume was only 0.2 pore volume, this
trend may reverse itself with continued
flow, but only after a very long testing
time.

     The effects of chemical concentration
on acrylate grout can be observed in
Figure 2.  The figure shows pairs of bars
side by side, allowing the comparison of
the effects of concentration of selected
chemicals on the permeability :of the
grout.  In the cases of acetone and
methanol t.he effects of the higher chemi-
cal concentrations are very pronounced. ,
On the other, hand, the ultimate perme-
ability of the grout was the same with
both concentrations of cupric sulfate,
and again with both concentrations of
hydrochloric acid.            •  •  •

Permeability Test Results For Cement-
Bentonite (Mix 2) Grout With Chemicals

     The way the cement-bentonite (mix 2)
grout behaved with the various chemicals
is summarized in the bar chart shown in
Figure 3.  With both water and chemicals,
this grout was the most impervious of
all tested.  The introduction of every
chemical caused the permeability of the
grout samples to decrease from their base-
line permeabilities with water.   With
very small amounts of flow of between
0.1 and 0.6 pore volumes, the permeabil-
ities of the samples dropped to  between
3 x lir11 and 6 x 10"11 cm/sec,  or to -a
practically impervious state.  Because
of their very low permeability,  these  '
samples allowed very low flow volumes,
even though they were tested on  the
average for more than 120 days.   It  is
possible that given enough time  and  flow
these chemicals could increase the perme-
ability of this grout, but it would  take
very long testing times.
                                           -187-

-------
sec
c
>*
-M
•iH
t-H
•rH
J3
(O
m
s
c_
CD
Qu
!-»•


°
>
O)
CD
^
V/
-1 	 1 	 1 	 1 	 1 	


33pv
\

W/1
r/x
\


20pv


lOpv
1


25p
1
V
t \
o

B.3pv
o 	 	 	 >•

30pv
!
i
O

     &
                   &
                                                       rj
                                                       •rH
                                                       c.
                                                       cr
                                                       UJ
    Figure 2.  Effect of leachate concentration on
               the permeability of  acrylate grout.
u
(U
en
     10
        ~6 '
JD
01
CL
             O.EpV
                      O.lpv
                          0.4pv
                                   O.lpv
                                       O.HpV
                                             O.ipv
                                                            c_
                                                            (U
                                                           JJ
                                                            ID
                                                          c.
                                                         JO
                                                         •r-l
     Figure  3.   Permeability  of cement-bentonite
                 (mix 2) grout with various  chemicals
                          -188-

-------
Permeability Test Results For Urethane
Grout With Chemicals
Permeability Test Results For Other
Grouts With Chemicals~
     Figure 4 illustrates in a bar chart
form the overall changes in permeability
of urethane grout with ten selected
chemicals.  As shown, the urethane grout
remained quite impervious with the majority
of the chemicals.  With 20% cupric sulfate
and 4N hydrochloric acid the grout perform-
ed marginally, as its final permeability
slightly exceeded the 1 x 10~' cm/sec
level.  The most detrimental to the
urethane grout were the 25% sodium
hydroxide and xylene.  The sodium hydroxide
caused a 4.5 orders of magnitude increase,
raising the equilibrium permeability of
the grout to much above the 1 x 10~7 cm/sec
1evel.

      The bar chart in Figure 5 shows the
effects of concentration of selected
chemicals on the final permeability of
the urethane grout.  As shown, varying
the concentrations can have varying
effects.  For example, with 25% ethylene
glycol the urethane grout  samples did not
exhibit increases in their permeabilities,
while the samples with a 100% solution of
ethylene glycol did.
     In addition to the above discussed
grouts, cement-bentonite (mix 1), sodium
silicate, glyoxal-modified sodium sili-
cate, and sodium aluminate-modified
sodium silicate grouts were also tested.
However, the baseline permeabilities of
these grouts with water ranged between
1.7 x 10"5 and 3.0 x 10"6 cm/sec, too high
for cutoff construction.  Nevertheless,
the grouts were subjected to limited
testing with chemicals and showed rela-
tively small changes in their permeabil-
ities.

Reactivity Tests

     The objectives of the reactivity
tests were to observe the weight and
volume changes that small samples of the
various grouts underwent during their
immersion in selected chemical baths,
and to explore if these observations
could be correlated with the corresponding
permeability test results.

     In this research the three grouts
tested for their reactivity were acrylate,
          u
          cu
          in
               10-
               10-
          .5    10
          CD
          CU
          e
          C-
          03
          Q.
                 -8
              10
                rlO
                    7.9pv
                   r*

                                           0.6pv
                                           .0.8
  8.7pv
       13.2pv
             IBpV
                                                                  20pv



                                                                        B.5pv..

                                                                               c.
                                                                               m
                                                                               -M
                                                                               to
                                t.
                             . .  J3
-.  CT
   UJ
                                                                        \«-
             Figure 4.  Permeability of urethane grout with various chemicals.
                                            -189-

-------
£   10
tn
                           -4..
                         10
                           -6--
                    to
                    03
                    e
                    c_
                    QJ
                    Q.
10
   -S--
      8.3pv
                                      DpV
                  lO.Bpv
                        17pv
                                                       20pv
                                                            40pv
                                            c.
                                            QJ
                                           -U
                                            ra
                                                                    C-
                                                                    J3
                                                13
                                                cr
                                                LU

                     Figure 5.  Effect of leachate concentration on
                                the permeability of urethane grout.
ceraent-bentonite, and urethane.  The
testing consisted of immersing the grout
samples in selected chemicals'and weighing
them after elapsed times of 1, 7, 14, 28,
56, and 84 days.  Plots of percent weight
change versus time were prepared for each
sample and replicate series.  In addition,
subjective observations were made and
recorded on the shrinkage, swelling,
spall ing, hardening, softening and
stickiness of the samples.  The results
ranged from total disintegration to as
much as a 40X weight increase.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PERMEABILITY AND
REACTIVITY TESTS

     The results from the two types of
tests were analyzed, compared, and a
scheme was proposed to allow the prediction
of the permeability behavior of grouts
with various chemicals from their behavior
with the same chemicals in the reactivity
tests.  This scheme is summarized in
Table 1.  In this table, weight and volume
changes in the vertical columns, and
consistency changes in the horizontal rows
are correlated with permeability changes
                      indicated in the boxes.  For example the
                      urethane samples in a xylene bath under-
                      went medium (10%, authors' classification)
                      weight losses, and they also became hard.
                      This case corresponds to the matrix loca-
                      tion column 2 and row 2, which reads:
                      "Permeability increases significantly."
                      Indeed, going back to Figure 4, it is seen
                      that the permeability of the urethane
                      grout with xylene increased almost three
                      orders of magnitude before it came to an
                      equilibrium.  It is proposed that with
                      the presented correlations the choice of
                      the most suitable grout for a site could
                      possibly be made based on reactivity tests
                      only, and these could be conducted at the
                      site of the hazardous waste.

                      CONCLUSIONS

                           1.  When tested for permeability, the
                      acrylate grout exhibited excellent to
                      satisfactory resistance to all chemicals,
                      except reagent grade aniline, 100% acetone,
                      IN and 4N concentrations of hydrochloric
                      acid, and 100% methanol.  These caused
                      increases of several orders of magnitude
                      in its permeability.
                                           -190-

-------
00
LU
a;
oo
LU
OO
=C
CO
Si
o
o;
UJ
a.
UJ
as
a-
 33
 >=c
a: UJ h-
il LU 00 -C 1— 1—
E h- =£ C3 :n oo • — •
13 et LU *— ' C5 LU OO
—I _J aS LU i— 1 1— Q
^ C_5 ^£ LU UJ
•=• •> 2: 3 00 LU
LU i-< _l <0
_i oo a: « o
=c < LU 1-1 oo 2: os
-« LU s I— oo i— > a.

5gg~
LU CD 3T t— H-
s:  «a: as 3 oo LU
LU I — 1 «=C O
_i as oo <: •> o
=c o —i z oo as
-I -Z. OS I— i— 00 CL.
— »-i LU i— I <£ O
-i i— s: CD _j

-4 — I •

0
>- z
— CO )— 1

LD 00 _1

U O D.
3 _1 00



UJ
jj OO t—
E =C 3: 00
Z) LU CJ3 OO
—I OS >-> O
O O LU — 1
>• LU 3
o

UJ
JJ 00 H-

5 LU 55 —•
O C_> LU C3

~-~ oo /
h- UJ LU /

•J}=>*Z /

Jj 0 3: / 0
3 > e_> / 2= oo
/ LU LU
/ t — CI
/ oo ^

y' oo a:






















C +J
ai eu -i-
P W J3

t- a> 
t/J •»—
ra i—
O) -i-
0 «3
c: j
^~ C 4-9

(O r—
i. ,. £ ,
•i- C
r— W IO
•i- O) U
J3 tA *i—
IO IO M-
O) Ol -i-
= «- c
t- o en
0) C -i—
O- -r- t/>











to £- t/)
COO)
IO T3 O "U
E «- o «-

OS -C J3 J=











^J
l_>

^" ^)
t- T3 i—
^5 O! i —
IO 4-> IO
£ 0) -i-
£- >*- C
Q) 1- -i-
o. 10 E


















£ s"
i|- O) -P O O> r—
O to fl3 5 t/> i —
IO IO J^ (O IO
CJ  5 -P O) E
E t- d> IO £_ -r-
£- o E o c:
}
C -P
0) O) -r-
IO IO IO
t_ O!  t-
O =  0) E
t_ E to
O ^
C Q) (rt
i— 1 O-T-











10 >,
O) -^
4J 0
If- •!-
0 =3
oo cr































C -P
r- T-

0) •»- OJ

IO 03 &_
O) 0) «3
i— E ^~
C flj W)
-1 Q.II-











Ul
c >>
01 i—
P f

O r—
^0 U5 :








































i — tSi
•r- O)
J3 01 >,
IO IO r—
0). 0) +J
E t- 10
t- O OJ
D c: t-
Q_ *r— Ol



to
O)
1 4->
C IO
.1- t-
to en
•i- O)
a -p ,
                                             -191-

-------
     2.  With all the chemicals tested,
the permeability of the cement-bentonite
(mix 2) grout decreased from its baseline
permeability with water to a practically
Impervious permeability of approximately
3 x 10"11 cm/sec.

     3.  The urethane grout remained
quite impervious with the majority of the
chemicals tested, except it performed
only marginally with 20% solution of
cupric sulfate, and IN and 4N concentrations
of hydrochloric acid, and poorly with 25%
solution of sodium hydroxide and reagent
grade xylene.

     4.  The effects of the concentration
of chemicals on the permeability of grouts
varied.  It was found from the limited
data that some chemicals with reduced
concentrations caused smaller increases
in the permeability of a grout than with
higher concentrations, while with other
chemicals, varying the concentration had
no significant effect.

     5.  From the analysis of reactivity
and permeability test results, a scheme
was proposed that correlates the weight
and consistency changes of the reactivity
samples of a grout immersed in a chemical,
to expected changes in its permeability
when permeated by the same chemical.
This may allow an engineer to make at
least the preliminary selection of suitable
grouts for a site by using reactivity
tests in place of the more costly
permeability tests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     The research described herein was
supported by the U.S. EPA Hazardous Waste
Engineering Research Laboratory, Cincin-
nati, Ohio.  Appreciation is expressed to
work assignment managers Herbert R. Pahren
and Ronald F.  Lewis, and project officers
John Martin and Joseph K. Burkart for their
technical and administrative support, and
to operations manager Gerard Roberto for
his support throughout this project.  The
authors also appreciate the work of grad-
uate students Roddy Sherer, Brian Randolph,
Jim Cipoll one and Bruce Hick.

REFERENCES

1.  Kinman, R.N., J. Rickabaugh,
    J. Donnelly, D. Nutini and M. Lambert.
    "Evaluation and Disposal of Waste
    Materials Within 19 Test Lysimeters
    at Center Hill," EPA-600/2-86-035,
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Cincinnati, Ohio, March 1986.

2.  May, J.H., R.J. Larson, P.G. Malone,
    J.A. Boa, Jr., and D.L. Bean.  "Grout-
    ing Techniques in Bottom Sealing of
    Hazardous Waste Sites," EPA-600/286-
    020, U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1985.

3.  Spooner, P.A., G.E. Hunt, V.E. Hodge,
    and P.M. Wagner.  "Compatibility of
    Grouts with Hazardous Wastes," EPA-
    600/2-84-015, U.S. Environmental
    Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio,
    1984.
                                           -192-

-------
                 ELECTRO-DECONTAMINATION OF CHROME-CONTAMINATED SOILS
                                  Sunirmal  Banerjee
                               University of Washington
                                 Seattle, WA  98195
                                      ABSTRACT

         A technique of in-situ treatment of inorganic waste-contamined soils is
    being explored at a Superfund site in a current study. Transport of inorganic
    ions under an  imposed electric field is  essentially the basis of this technique.
    In this  paper, the results of the laboratory experiments conducted on undisturbed
    soil samples obtained from the site and the initial  results of preliminary field
    experiments are  reported.

         Generally,  the laboratory results have shown that with appropriate combina-
    tion of  applied hydraulic and electric fields,  it  is possible  to remove chromium
    at a faster rate by this approach than by hydraulic leaching alone.  The pre-
    liminary field experiments also show that chromium concentrations can be altered
    by electro-kinetic treatment alone.
INTRODUCTION

     In the past, electro-kinetics have
been applied in a variety of engineering
projects.  Mostly, these applications made
use of the electro-osmotic transport of
the liquid phase.  The past applications
include dewatering and consolidation of
soils (3,5),  recovery ,of embedded objects
from the ocean floor (4),  alteration of
penetration  or  pull-out resistance  of
piles (2),  dewatering of sewage  sludge
(8), and  mine tailings ponds (9)  and
dredge spoils  (11),  and increasing
recovery rates in oil  fields  (1)  among
others.  Some previous studies have also
indicated that,  from  a technical point of
view, electro-kinetic treatment  of the
ground may be  a feasible approach  for
decontaminating waste-contaminated soils
(6,7,10).

     However,  the practical  effectiveness
and feasibility of such a technique have
not been explored.  Definitive field-scale
testing is required prior to widespread
application of the technique.  This pro-
ject  was, therefore,  undertaken as  a
field-scale  study,  the  scope of  which
included a) characterization of the soil-
water electrolyte system at a Superfund
site in Corvallis, Oregon,  b)  bench-scale
studies  and  design  of in-situ electro-
kinetic experiments, c) performance of a
series of field tests and d)  establishment
of some possible relationships  between the
extent (and rate) of decontamination and
the important experimental variables based
on the field  test results.   The project is
only partially complete at present.  The
underlying concepts  of the treatment and
some of  the up to date  findings  are
reported in this  paper.

APPROACH

     The  processes  associated with the
flow of direct-current electricity  through.
soil-water electrolyte systems are  collec-
tively termed electro-kinetics.   These
                                        -193-

-------
include electro-osmosis, electrophoresis,
and  other electro-chemical  processes.
These  processes mainly  cause  relative
movement of electricity  (current flow),
ions  (ionic  drift),  charged particles
(electrophoresis) and of the liquid  phase
(electro-osmosis).  The major effects of
electro-kinetic  processes  are  movement of
water, ionic drift, ion exchange, develop-
ment of osmotic and pH gradients, electro-
lysis, hydrolysis, oxidation, reduction,
heat generation,  gas  evolution, formation
of secondary minerals, physical and chemi-
cal  adsorption, and many others.   The
overall  effect  is quite complex and the
present-day understanding  is not  up to the
task of  quantitatively accounting for all
of these effects of electro-kinetic pro-
cesses.  Nevertheless,  the empirical evi-
dence from the past applications  leads one
to believe that electro-kinetics may have
some possible applications in waste-man-
agement.    A partial  list of the poten-
tial  applications of electro-kinetics  in
waste management is shown in Table 1.  The
present project attempts to  evaluate the
practical effectiveness of electro-kine-
tics as the  primary method  of treating
waste-contaminated soils.
                  TABLE 1

 APPLICATIONS OF ELECTRO-KINETICS IN WASTE HftNAGEHENT


  --  AS PRIMARY HETHOD OF TREATMENT

     Valor-borne and adsorbed offensive eleaents can be made
     to flow toward wells (electrodes) and can be extracted
     froa the ground.


  --  AS AID TO OTHER ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUES

     a) With Excavation of Contaminated Soil

        Soils which  are difficult to dewater by
        conventional techniques can be dewatered; need to
        excavate Bay be eliminated by lowering the water
        table.

     b) With Installation of Impervious Barriers

        For grout curtains, sheet piles and floor seals,
        etc., electro-kinetics can be used to enhance
        placement at  desired locations and thereby
        reaove uncertainties in forming an impervious
        seal.
     c)
ijlth Injection of Chemical or Biological
Detoxifying Agents"
        Electro-kinetics can be used to assure uniform
        distribution and improve effectiveness.

     d)  With Collection of Contaminant Plumes by Pumping

        Electro-kinetics can be used to reduce dilution by
        surrounding fresh water.  Contaminant plumes may
        be directed back to waste site for containment or
        treatment.
BACKGROUND

Site History

     The  field  evaluation  of electro-
kinetic treatment is being conducted in
Corvallis, Oregon within the confines of
an  abandoned  industrial  hard  chrome
plating facility, previously called United
Chrome  Products,  Inc.  (UCPI).   The site is
one of  the  nation's Superfund sites and is
situated next to  the Corvallis Airport,
south  of  the  Airport  Road.   The  UCPI
facility and its  immediate vicinity is
shown  in the site location plan (Fig. 1).
UCPI conducted a chromium plating opera-
tion at the site from 1956 to 1985 and is
reportedly  responsible  for discharging
liquid  plating  wastes into the  subsurface
soils  at the site.   The principal  loca-
tions of discharge were the dry well  dis-
posal pit on the west end of the building
and some leaky plating tanks inside the
building.
Subsurface Conditions

     The  project  site is located on the
alluvial  plains of the Willamette River
Valley and  occupies  about  1.5  acres of
level  ground.  Detailed investigation of
the conditions  at  the  site was carried out
by the CHoM  Hill  Company under a  contract
with theTJSEPA Hazardous Waste Site Con-
trol Division of  the  Region  10 office and
is available in  the report  for Contract
No.  68-01-6692.   This report reveals that
the  subsoils are characterized generally
by unconsolidated deposits of clay, silt
and  gravel which can be broken into three
distinct  units,  an upper aquifer, a lower
aquifer and  an  aquitard separating the two
aquifers.    The upper  soils in the profile
consist  of  about  2  to 3   ft.   of
miscellaneous  fill or top soil and 15 to
20 ft. of clayey silt to silt ranging from
mottled grayish brown to bright yellow in
color.   This layer  of soil extends to  a
depth  of 17 to 21 ft.  below the ground
surface.   The  less  pervious soil  layer
which  separates the two saturated  previous
zones, consists of light blue to  dark gray
clay to silty/sandy clay ranging  in thick-
ness from  2.5  to 12  ft.   The  bottom of
this layer  extends from 22 to 29 ft. in
depth  below the ground surface over the
site.  The lower aquifer consists of wet,
fine to coarse  sands  and gravels  and is at
least 15 ft.  thick at the site.   The
                                            -194-

-------
        AIRPORT ROAD
               'BE2
                                      N
        Leaky
        Storage Tanks
       BE1
             UNITED CHROME


            Dry Well Area

      - Soil Boring Locations.
Fig. 1:  Location plan for soil borings.

groundwater table fluctuates seasonally
between 0 to 10 ft. below the ground sur-
face and has a slope of approximately 5
ft. per mile in the north-northeast direc-
tion.

Site Characteristics

      The near-surface soils are heavily
contaminated with chromium and the distri-
bution of the contaminant concentration is
greatly variable (100 -  10000 mg/1) with
depth and distance from the  source points.
Fortunately, the affected soils have low
permeability  (ranging from 5  x 10~4
cm/sec, to  5 x 10 ° cm/sec.) and there is
very little flow of groundwater at the
site, the average hydraulic gradient at
the  site being  only 0.008 ft./ft.   In
fact,  the  risk  of proliferation  is
increased  by  the presence  of the open
ditch which runs along the northern edge
of  the site.   During  the winter  the
standing water  in  the  ditch comes  in
direct contact with the groundwater and
carries contaminants up to the Willamette
River.

     The  general  characteristics of the
site were assessed in view of the poten-
tial application  of electro-kinetic treat-
    ment.   These characteristics,  e.g.
    moderately large area! extent of the  site,
    nearly  static groundwater regime and
    saturated moderately permeable soils at
    shallow depth and  relatively  simple
    chemistry  of  the  wastes,  are  ideally
    suitable for  in-situ  electro-kinetic
    treatment.   The size of the site  is
    neither so large that an untested tech-
    nique might be considered  too risky for
    the benefits expected, nor it is so small
    that excavation and disposal at a secure
+BE3 facility  can   be considered desirable.
    Again, the near-surface contaminated soils
    which range from clayey silts to silty
    clays are  not permeable  enough to  be
    easily treated by iri-situ leaching.  The
    major ionic constitutents of the contami-
    nants at the site are trivalent and hexa-
    valent chromium (Cr  III  cationic form, and
    Cr VI anionic form). The anionic chromium,
    being more stable in the pH range of the
    groundwater at this site, is more predomi-
    nant in  the soil-water system.  Hexavalent
    chromium is relatively unreactive  with
    soil  and  is  not  expected   to  be
    significantly retarded in its migration by
    adsorption or precipitation. Furthermore,
    the high enough concentration  and ionic
    mobility of chromium are also  favorable
    factors.  Hence,  it  seems  quite  likely
    that it can  be transported  with the
    induced flow with  relatively high
    efficiency and  with low electrical power
    consumption.                    x
    PRELIMINARY RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Laboratory Tests

        To .aid in the design  and development
    of  a  field  test program,  a  field
    exploration effort was first devoted to
    obtaining representative  samples  of
    contaminated  on-site soils.    These
    samples were brought back to the  labor-
    atory to evaluate the pertinent geotech-
    nical  and chemical  characteristics  of the
    soil and pore water and to develop  some
    bench-scale  data  on  the effects  of
    electro-kinetic treatment.

        The laboratory tests were carried out
    in a specially designed electro-kinetic
    cell.   It was decided that combining of
    hydraulic leaching with electro-kinetic
    treatment may be appropriate,  since main-
    taining continuous  flow of liquid across
    the sample would eliminate desaturation
                                       -195-

-------
due to trapping  of evolved gases in the
sample.   The effectiveness of  electro-
kinetic  treatment was  observed  by
comparing  the  results of  hydraulic
leaching  experiments with those of com-
bined hydraulic  and  electro-kinetic
experiments.

     Chromium removal by leaching of the
soil column appeared to depend  only on the
total water  flow through the sample and
was apparently independent  of the
hydraulic   gradient  (or  pressure
difference)  across the sample.   Results
from the tests are presented as normalized
plots of  cumulative fraction of  chromium
removed against cumulative volume of water
leached per  unit volume  of soil sample.
Fig.  2  shows  that  no  significant
difference  in  the total  fraction  of
chromium removed  was  noticeable  even
though Experiments 1 and 2 were carried
out at variable  pressure differences
across the sample.  These  results indicate
that  in  the  case of hydraulic  leaching
alone the principal mechanism of  chromium
removal  is miscible displacement.   The
results of Experiments 1 and 2 were used
as  a  comparison basis for  the  electro-
kinetic effect on chromium removal in the
subsequent experiments.

     In the later experiments, DC  electric
fields were applied across the sample in
addition to the hydraulic leaching.  The
first  few experiments  which combined
hydraulic leaching and electro-kinetic
treatment were carried  out with  frequent
reversal of the direction  of fluid flow or
electric  field.   The  superposition  of
electric field was seen to either reduce
or enhance removal rate depending upon the
point of collection  of net hydraulic  flow
or effluent.  While anodic effluent showed
an  increase in  the rate  of removal,
cathodic effluents showed  a decrease.   In
Experiments  5,  7, and 8, the effluents
were collected at the anode.  Fig. 3 shows
a comparison  of the results of Experiment
1 (and 2 combined) with those of Experi-
ments 5  and  7 carried out  at different
field strengths.  It can be seen  from Fig.
3 that in order to achieve 95% removal of
chromium, Experiments 1 (and 2 combined),
7 and 5  would require passing of   net
fluid flow of 1.1.,  0.8, and 0.5 times the
volume of soil treated.  In other words,
electro-kinetics may significantly de-
crease not only the time of in-situ treat-
ment, but also  the amount of  leachate
water to be treated elsewhere.
1.0
0.9-

0.8-

0.7-

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2-

0.1
0.0.
           p=OJ>7
p=pressure difference
  across sanpte
+ Exp1, p=0.14 Kg/cm2
O Exp2, variable p
  OO
      0.3   0.6   0.9    1.2   1.5   1.8   2.1
           Cumulative Volume Ratio, I V/Vo
                                       24
  Fig. 2:  Effect of hydraulic gradient
           On  Cr removal by leaching.
                              o  D OB o
                        X Exp 1 & 2
                        D Exp 5 - 1.0 V/cm
                        O Exp 7 - 0.1 V/cm
  0.0  03  0.6  0.9  1.2  1.5   1.8  2.1  2.4  2.7  30
           Cnmolatire Volume Ratio, EV/Vo

   Fig. 3:  Comparison of effects of
           combined treatment  and
           hydraulic leaching.
                                        -196-

-------
Field Test Program

     Although the  laboratory test results
Indicate  that simultaneous application of
hydraulic  and  electrical  gradients  in
opposite directions is necessary for re-
moval of (anionic) chromium, this may be
an artifact of the laboratory  electro-
kinetic cell.   In order to prevent  de-
saturation of the laboratory sample near
the anode, it was necessary to  maintain
flow  through  the sample  by hydraulic
leaching.  For field soils,  this may not
be warranted and  it may be possible to
subject  the  field  soils to electro-
kinetics alone for treatment.  Hence, it
was considered  appropriate to adopt a two-
stage approach for field activities in
order  that such  uncertainties can  be
resolved.   The field-scale  effort  was
split into: a) feasibility-level experi-
ments and b) final  experiments.  The pur-
pose of the feasibility level experiments
was evaluation  (if possible) of the effec-
tiveness of the process of ionic migra-
tion, identification and elimination of
possible  experimental difficulties,  cali-
bration of instrumentation and estimation
of hydraulic and  electro-kinetic conduc-
tivity parameters  in the field.  The major
emphasis was to check in the field whether
anionic chromium can be mobilized towards
the anodes simply due to the process of
ionic migration under electrical field or
if migration of chromium ions takes place
in the direction of movement of the bulk
solution.

     The  field-scale operations were
designed in  as much detail  as possible by
giving proper consideration to:  a) elec-
trode  configuration  and material,   b)
hydraulic leaching  system,  c) monitoring
system  and   d)  power  source and  con-
sumption.  The shallow well BE1 shown in
Fig.  1 was chosen to serve as the cathode.
The anodes were installed at  the vertices
of a regular hexagon (5 ft. spacing) with
the cathode  being at the  center  of the
hexagon.  The anodes  were  reinforcing
steel  rods (0.25 in. diameter, 20  ft.long)
inserted in 15 ft.  deep slotted PVC  tube
wells.   An  alternate  set of four  such
anodes was also placed in a square pattern
(8 ft.  spacing)  around  the cathode.
During the experiments,  the response of
the soil-water electrolyte to the treat-
ment  was designed to  be monitored  and
controlled by keeping measurement records
of the important experimental variables,
e.g. applied potential, total current  flow
across the pairs of electrodes, pH, con-
                  O
                    SQ1
                                                    DIRECTION OF
                                                   GROUHBWATER flOW
             	_.	J
               ••"F^-H
    SYMBOLS:
    -- KbdricUr UM lor 1ta*o&u«n.

    (•) Vill «ad OtclKril.

    •  For* Fr*Mor« Tnuudtmr.
    Fig. 4:  Schematic plan for field
            experimental setup.
                                                                       I iMilYSIS 1
                                             Fig. 5:  Schematic plan for monitoring
                                                      and sampling system.
                                       -197-

-------
ductivity, chromium concentration, temper-
ature, redox potential  of the effluent,
time of  sampling and length  of  treatment
time,  hydraulic flow volume injected or
withdrawn and  levels  of  standing  water in
the wells.  A  schematic  plan of the elec-
trodes and the electrical  connections for
the field set up-is shown in Fig. 4.  Fig.
5 shows  the schematic plan  of the moni-
toring and sampling system.

     Three preliminary sets of experiments
with hexagonal  and square anode geometry
have been completed.   The  early indi-
cations  are very promising. The typical
results  obtained from the first two con-
secutive experiments  are shown in  Figs. 6
and  7.

     The first  test  was carried out for
26.5  hours  with  5-volt  potential
difference across the anodes arranged in
the  hexagonal pattern  and  the cathode.
                                The second test was performed  by applying
                                30 volts across the same  electrodes  for  5
                                hours.  Figs.  6a)  and 7a) show temporal
                                variations of pH  values  of  the water
                                samples extracted  from the cathode  (SE1),
                                one  of the  anodes  (H5)  and  the inter-
                                mediate monitoring well (Ml).  The tem-
                                poral  variations of concentration of
                                chromium in those samples  are shown in
                                Figs. 6b) and  7b).   It can be noted that
                                pH values  are  increasing at SE1 and HI  and
                                decreasing at  H5.  This is expectedly  due
                                to electrolysis of water at and near  the
                                cathode  and  dissolution of  ion  at  the
                                anode.  Unfortunately, the  trend in  the
                                variation of  chromium concentration is
                                apparently confusing.  The decrease in
                                concentration of chromium at the anode is
                                unexpected.   This anomolous change at  the
                                anode  may  have  been  caused  by copre-
                                cipitation of chromium with  iron  oxide
                                produced  by  anodic  dissolution.   The
                                decrease of chromium concentration at  the
         TEST 1:HBXACONAL PATTERN CSV FOR Z«:30HR
            a) pH changes In Cathode, Anode, and
                   Monitoring Will.
                               SE1 (CATHODE)
                             D H5  (ANODE) •
                             O Ml  (MONITORING)
  0.0
   00
TSiJT   22.5   30.0
    TIME (HOURS)
                                   37.5
                                          4 .0
            b) Cnong.ll of Total Cr Concentration In
             Cathode, Anode, and Monitoring Well.
                                          TEST 2:HEXAGONAL PATTERN O30V FOR 5 HR
                                             a) pH changes In Cathode, Anode, and
                                                    Monitoring Well.
                                                 12.0

                                                 10.5

                                                  9.O

                                                  7.5

                                                  6.01
                                   0.0
                                                 450!
                                                                                 18
                                                                                      21
          "T    12    15
            TUB (HOURS)
SE1 (CATHODE) a H5   (ANODE) O Ml   (MONITORING)

    b> Changes of Total Cr Concentration In
     Cathode, Anode, and Monitoring Well.
                                                                                           24
                           + SE1 (CATHODE)
                           a H5 (ANODE)
                           O Ml (MONITORING WELL)
    00
          7.5
 15.0    22J536.0
    TIUE (HOURS)
           9    12   IS
            TIME (HOURS)
  Fig.  6:   Temporal  variations of pH and Cr
           concentration during Test 1.
                                  Fig. 7:  Temporal  variations of pH and
                                           Cr concentration during Test 2.
                                           -198-

-------
cathode with simultaneous  Increase at the
monitoring well may be indicative of ionic
transport  due to electrical treatment
during the second test. Further assess-
ment of the preliminary test  data is con-
tinuing and a more coherent understanding
of  the  process may  emerge  in the  near
future.
CONCLUSIONS

     The following conclusions may  be
drawn from the results of the experiments
conducted so far:
(1)  Laboratory tests have shown that a
     combination of electro-kinetic and
     hydraulic treatment can accelerate
     the process of chromium removal sub-
     stantially compared to hydraulic
     treatment by itself.  This acceler-
     ation  should be much more pronounced
     in the field  operations  where  the
     hydraulic gradient which can be prac-
     tically applied (and consequently the
     flow)  will be very small.
            ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The research described in this paper
has been funded wholly or in  part by the
United  States  Environmental Protection
Agency through Cooperative Agreement  No.
CR811762,  to the University of Washington.
It has been subject to the Agency's peer
review and  approved for publication.
Approval does not signify  that the content
necessarily reflects the view  and policies
of the Agency,  nor does mention of trade-
names or commercial products constitute
endorsement  or recommendation  for use.
Technical guidance  from the  Project
Officer,  Mr.  Jonathan G. Herrmann,   is
gratefully acknolwedged.   Contributions  by
Prof.  J. F. Ferguson, co-investigator,  and
Mr.  J.  J.  Horng,  graduate  research
assistant, are also greatly appreciated.
(2)  The possible mechanisms involved  in
     the treatment are dispersion due  to
     hydraulic flow, ion migration,  elec-
     trolysis of  water,  adsorption/de-
     sorption and chromium reduction due
     to imposed electric field.  There are
     significant experimental and theo-
     retical  problems in quantitatively
     assessing these  factors  and their
     interactions.
(3)  Considerable work is still  needed to
    reach general guidelines for use of
    this technology.   Continued labor-
    atory experimentation is needed to
    accompany field studies and labor-
    atory studies should evolve  to extend
    the range  of physical  and  chemical
    conditions studied.
                                        -199-

-------
              REFERENCES
1.  Anbah,  S. A.,  Chilingar, G. V.  and      6.
    Beeson, C. H., "Application of Elec-
    trical  Current  for Increasing  the
    Flow Rate of Oil  and Hater in  a
    Porous Medium," J. of Can. Petro.
    Tech.. April-June 1965.                   7.

2.  Butterfield, R. and Johnson, I. H.,
    "The  Influence of Electro-Osmosis on
    Metallic  Piles in  Clay," Geotech-
    nlque,  Vol.  30, No. 1, 1980,  pp.  17-
    38.                                      8.

3.  Chappel,   B.  A.  and  Burton,  P.  L.,
    "Electro-Osmosis Applied to Unstable
    Embankment," Journal of the Geotech-
    nical Division,   ASCE, Vol. 101,  GTS,      9.
    August, 1974, pp. 733-740.

4.  Esrig,  M. I. and  Henkel, D. J.,  "The
    Use of Electro-Kinetics in  Raising
    Submerged,  Partially  Buried Metallic      10.
    Objects," Report  to Department of
    Navy, ONR, Research Project No.  RR-
    004-01-01, March  25,  1966.

5.  Fetzer,  C. A.,  "Electro-Osmotic      11.
    Stabilization  of West Branch Dam,"
    Journal  of  SH and  Fdn.   Division,
    ASCE,  Vol. 93, SM4, July  1967, pp.
    85-106.
Gibbs, H. J., "Research on  Electro-
Reclamation of Saline-Alkali Soils,"
Trans. ASAE,  Vol.  9,  1966,  pp.  164-
169.

Hamnet, R., "A Study of the  Processes
Involved in the Electro-Reclamation
of  Contaminated Soils,"  M.S.C.
Thesis,  Univ.  of Manchester,  U.K.,
1980.

Liang,  L., "Electro-Osmotic  De-
watering of Hastewater Sludges,"
Ph.D. Thesis,  Dept.  of Mechanical
Eng'g.,  M.I.T., Cambridge, MA, 1977.

Lockhart, N. C.,  "Sedimentation and
Electro-Osmotic Dewatering of Coal-
Washery Slimes,"  Fuel 60, 1981,  919-
923.

Puri,  A. N.,  and Anand, B., "Recla-
mation of Alkali  Soils  by Electro-
dialysis, Soil  Science,  Vol. 42,
1936,  23-27.

Segal 1,  B.  A., O'Bannon,  C.  E. and
Matthias,  J. A.,  "Electro-Osmosis
Chemistry of Hater Quality," Journal
of  Geotechnical Division,  ASCE,  Vol.
106,  GT10,  October 1980,  pp. 1148-
1152.
                                        -200-

-------
                CURRENT STATUS OF THE DESIGNATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF CERCLA
              HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
                                    K. Jack Kooyoomjian
                                       John E. Riley
                       Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
                                Emergency Response Division
                           U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
                                   Washington, DC 20460

                                       Richard Field
                            Office of Research and Development
                      Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                           U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
                                     Edison, NO 08837
                                         ABSTRACT

      In  this  paper  the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency (EPA)  describes  the-technical
 methodology  it  has  used to adjust  reportable  quantities  (RQs)  of CERCLA hazardous
 substances, which when  released  into  the environment  must  be  reported  to  the National
 Response Center (NRC),  and the methodologies  the Agency  is  considering for designation  of
 additional CERCLA hazardous  substances.   In accordance With CERCLA Section 102   the EPA
 Administrator may promulgate regulations to establish the  level  of release of a hazardous
 substance which must  be reported to the  NRC.   The methodology  considers the  intrinsic
 physical/chemical,  toxicologic,  and degradative  properties  of  the  hazardous  substance
 The Administrator issued  Final Rules  on  April  4,  1985 and on September 29, 1986 which
 a^J^n^nthe statutory  RQS of 442  of  the 717  CERCLA hazardous  substances.  Section  102(a)
 of CERCLA provides  the  Administrator  with  the  authority  to  designate additional hazardous
 substances and  adjust their  RQs.   The options  available.to  the Administrator for choosing
 those substances most appropriate  for designation are also  described.
INTRODUCTION

     This paper is a status report of the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA's/Agency's) progress to date on the
adjustment of the statutory Reportable
Quantities (RQs) of the hazardous substances
(HS) as defined in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA or "Superfund"), and
on the Agency's strategy for designating
additional CERCLA HS as provided for in
CERCLA Section 102(a).   It also discusses
the status of other EPA regulations related
to the reporting of releases of HS and other
potentially harmful  chemicals.
    This paper is relevant to this
conference on hazardous waste research
because the reporting provisions of CERCLA
and its implementing regulations are not
limited to episodic releases such as those
which sometimes occur during transportation
incidents, for example, but apply to any
release which reaches the environment such
as those which occur at hazardous waste
sites.

BACKGROUND

The CERCLA Hazardous Substances

     The term "hazardous substance" has a
very specific meaning according to CERCLA.
                                            -201-

-------
Section 101(14) of CERCLA defines a
hazardous substance as:

1. Any substance designated pursuant to
   Section 311(b) of the Clean Water Act
   (CWA);

2. Any hazardous waste having
   characteristics identified under or
   listed pursuant to Section 3001 of the
   Solid Waste Disposal Act, otherwise known
   as the Resource Conservation and Recovery
   Act (RCRA);

3. Any toxic pollutant listed under Section
   307(a) of the CWA;

4. Any hazardous air pollutant listed under
   Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA);

5. Any imminently hazardous chemical
   substance or mixture with respect to
   which the Administrator of EPA  has taken
   action pursuant to Section 7 of the Toxic
   Substances  Control Act  (TSCA);  and

6. Any element, compound, mixture, solution
   or  substance the Administrator  determines
   to  be hazardous pursuant to Section  102
   of  CERCLA.

     There are currently  717 HS  composed of
611  unique chemical compounds and  106 waste
streams.  This total  does  not include
chemicals or  mixtures  that  exhibit
characteristics  of  ignitibility,
corrosivity,  reactivity,  or extraction
procedure toxicity  according  to  40 CFR
261.20.   Such chemicals  and mixtures  are
also considered HS,  but  because  it would be
 impossible  to identify all  such  chemicals
and  mixtures, they are not specifically
 listed under RCRA,  and therefore,  they are
not  specifically listed  under CERCLA.   As of
 this date the Administrator has  not
 exercised his authority to designate any new
 substances  as CERCLA HS pursuant to Section
 102.

 Notification Requirements

      Section 103(a) of CERCLA requires any
 person in charge of an offshore or onshore
 facility or a vessel to report to the
 National Response Center (NRC) as soon as
 that person has knowledge of any  release of
 a HS that is equal to or greater  than the RQ
 for that HS.  The term "facility" includes
 active and inactive hazardous waste sites.
 Once the NRC  is notified, it informs the
predesignated On-Scene Coordinator (OSC)
pursuant to the National  Contingency Plan
(40 CFR 300) of the release.  The OSC
evaluates the circumstances of the release,
gives the pertinent information to
appropriate state and local officials and
decides whether, and in what manner the
Federal government should respond to the
release.

Adjustment of Reportable Quantities

     Congress assigned statutory RQs to the
HS in Section 102(b) of CERCLA.  All of the
HS received statutory RQs of 1-pound except
those HS that were designated pursuant to
Section 311(b) of the CWA which received
statutory RQs equal to the  RQs assigned
pursuant to Section 311(b)(4) of the CWA
and codified in 40 CFR 117.  Section 102 of
CERCLA also authorizes the  Administrator to
adjust the  statutory RQs of the HS.

Rulemaking  History

Adjustments to Statutory RQs., The Agency
has promulgated  final adjusted RQs for 442
HS in  two  separate  rulemaking actions.   The
first  of these  final  rules  was published in
the  Federal  Register  on April 4,  1985  (50
FR 13456 -  13513).It finalized  adjusted
RQs .for  340 HS.   The  other final  rule  was
published  on September 29,  1986  (51 £R
34534  -  34549)  and  it  finalized  adjusted
RQs  for  102 HS.   Most  of these  102  HS  had
been  identified  as  chronic toxicants.   On
March  16,  1987  the  Agency  published  a
Notice of  Proposed  Rulemaking  (NPRM)  (52 FR
8140 - 8171)  that proposed adjustments to
an additional  273 of the  remaining  275 HS.
This  proposed  rule  presents the  Agency's
methodology for adjusting  statutory RQs  on
the  basis  of potential  carcinogenicity.
The  two remaining HS, lead and methyl
 isocyanate, are still  being studied by the
Agency, and may have their statutory
 1-pound RQs adjusted in  the future.

      Also, in the Federal  Register on March
 16,  1986 the Agency published another NPRM
 that proposed adjustments to the 1-pound
 statutory RQ for Radionuclides (52 _FR 8172
 - 8186). This broad generic category
 includes thousands of separate substances,
 and therefore neither the category nor the
 individual radionuclides are counted among
 the 717 CERCLA HS.

 Designation of Additional  Hazardous
 Substances.  The Agency has solicited
                                             -202-

-------
 comments on various methods that could be
 used to designate additional HS in an
 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
 (ANPRM) published in the Federal Register on
 May 25, 1983 (48 £R 23602 - 23605jT^   -

 The Reauthorized Superfund

      On October 17, 1986 the President
 signed the Superfund Amendments and
 Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA).  The
 SARA is a law that strengthens the EPA's
 role in state environmental activities,
 increases the liability of private
 companies, and  imposes strict requirements
 on settlement provisions, judicial  review,
 and cleanup standards.  In the reauthorized
 CERCLA, Congress included Title III (The
 Emergency Planning artd Community Right-to-
 Know Act of 1986)  which was designed  to
 prevent a catastrophe  similar to the
 incident which  occurred in Bhopal,  India  in
 1984 with the release  of methyl  isocyanate.

      Title III  provides for the
 establishment of emergency plans at the
 local  level  based  on data from facilities  in
 the area.   Chemicals stored at these
 facilities  are  reported to  a  Local  Emergency
 Planning Committee (LEPC),  which then  will
 consider how to  handle  a  situation  in  the
 event  of a  release of  that  chemical.   In
 order  to implement the  system,  Congress  has
 defined  the  chemicals  and their  quantities
 that  shall  be subject  to  this  reporting
 requirement.  The  Title also  provides  for
 civil  and  criminal  penalties  for failure to
 comply.

 RQ  ADJUSTMENT

     A  previous paper  (1)  provided  a
 detailed description of the methodology the
 Agency  uses  to adjust the statutory RQs of
 the CERCLA HS.  In addition, the reader is
 referred to  the. Technical Background
 Documents that provide  the technical basis
 for the  RQ adjustment methodology (2)(3)(4).
 The following is a brief  description of the
 RQ adjustment methodology.

     The RQ adjustment methodology consists
 of two major steps.  The  first major step
 involves evaluation of the physical,
chemical and toxicological characteristics
of each HS.  The primary criteria examined
are: aquatic toxicity,  acute mammalian
toxicity (oral,  dermal, and inhalation),
 ignitibility, reactivity, chronic toxicity,
and potential carcinogenicity.  For each
  primary criterion a five-tier rating scale
  is  used, corresponding with RQ values of 1,
  10,  100, 1000,  and 5000 pounds.   Since this
  five-tier system was  successfully used in
  the  CWA and  both the  regulated community
  and  response personnel  are  familiar with
  it,  the Agency  has decided  to use this
  methodology  for adjusting the statutory RQs
  of the  CERCLA HS.

      The Agency has proposed  to  use only
  three of the five  RQ  levels  (1,  10, and 100
  pounds)  for  assigning  adjusted RQs  to  the
  CERCLA  HS  that  are potential  carcinogens.
  This decision is  based  on the special
  properties associated with  potential
  carcinogens  and  an analysis of the  risks
  posed by their  release.  A complete
  discussion is provided  in (4).

      Each  HS  is  evaluated according  to  the
  primary  criteria and an RQ value  is
  determined for each applicable criterion.
  The primary criteria RQ for each  HS  is  the
  lowest value of all the applicable
  criteria.  For example, if a  particular
  HS's ignitibility corresponds  to  a  RQ of
  1000 pounds, chronic toxicity  to  a  5000
  pound RQ, aquatic toxicity to  a 10  pound
  RQ,  mammalian toxicity to a 100 pound RQ,
 and  reactivity to a 1000 pound RQ, the
 primary criteria RQ is 10 pounds, based on
 the  RQ for aquatic toxicity.  The Agency  •
 then evaluates each HS according to a set
 of secondary criteria  consisting of.
 biodegradation,  hydrolysis,  or photolysis-
  (BHP).   The primary criteria RQ is then
 raised  one level if an analysis indicates
 that the HS naturally  degrades by BHP into
 less  hazardous products when released into
 the  environment.

 Research Needs

      The Agency  recognizes  that technical
 updates  to the final  rules  on  RQ
 adjustments will  be an ongoing process
 because; 1) the  RQ adjustment  methodology
 relies  on existing data in the areas of
 health  effects,  aquatic  toxicity,
 ignitibility, reactivity, and  degradation
.in the  environment, many of  which  are areas
 of active research, and  2) the Agency is
 active  in the areas of generating  and
 reviewing data on the  toxicology  of
 chemicals.   Technical  updates  of
 promulgated adjusted RQs  are appropriate
 because  such  updates will result  in  RQs
 that  are  more accurate  and which will
 better protect the  public health,  welfare,
                                          -203-

-------
and the environment, and in those cases
where additional data result in raising an
RQ, will lessen compliance burdens on the
regulated community.

     The Agency will periodically review the
published and unpublished literature for the
purpose of using the highest quality data
for RQ adjustment purposes.  When new data
are found that affect the adjusted RQ of a
HS the Agency will propose a new adjusted RQ
in the Federal Register in a technical
update rulemaking.  In addition, the Agency
will accept for review data on chemicals
supplied by the public from the literature
or from laboratory studies, and if
warranted, propose adjusting the RQ of the
HS in question.

     An analysis of the current data set on
the CERCLA HS reveals the  following
statistics  :

1. There are  215 HS  (35%)  without aquatic
   toxicity data, although some of these are
   gases or are insoluble  in water.

2. There are  193 HS  (32%)  without acute
   mammalian  oral toxicity data,  although
   some of  these are  gases.

3. There are  497 HS  (81%)  without acute
   mammalian  inhalation  toxicity  data,
   although some of these  are  solids  not
   normally available as  dusts or low vapor-
    pressure liquids.

4. There  are 542  HS (89%)  without acute
   mammalian dermal  toxicity data,  although
   many of these  are gases.

 5.  There are six  HS (1%)  that have  adjusted
    RQs (either final or soon to be  proposed)
    based on either LDlo or LClo data (the
    lowest dosage  or concentration known  to
    have been lethal to an individual  of the
    test species).   Such data are generally
    from limited studies that were unable to
    produce suitable LD50 or LC50 data, or
    from accidental poisonings (see Table 1
    for definitions of LD data).

 6. It is believed that the data collected on
    ignitibility and reactivity represent a
    complete data set since ignitibility is
    based on the fundamental physical
    properties of boiling  point and flash
    point, and reactivity  is based on well
    known polymerization and water reaction
    tendencies.  The methods for measuring
 these properties were established many
 years ago and massive amounts of such data
 have been generated.

DESIGNATION OF NEU CERCLA HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCES

     Section 102(a) of CERCLA provides the
Administrator of EPA the authority to
designate as hazardous any element,
mixture, solution, or substance, which,
when released into the environment, may
present substantial danger to the public
health or welfare or the environment.  As
mentioned previously, the Agency published
an ANPRM on designation on  May 25, 1983
(48 £R 23602 - 23605).  The Agency is
considering several sources of candidate
substances for designation, including the
lists mandated by SARA and from other
sources.
Reasons for Designating Additional
Hazardous Substances
     The reasons  for designating additional
 substances are:

 1. The  lists  pursuant to CERCLA Section
   101(14) are not  all  inclusive of
   potentially harmful  substances.

 2  Designation of substances  as HS
   encourages greater care  in handling.

 3. Designation of substances  as HS
   encourages recycling.

 4. Designation of substances  as HS  provides
   the  Administrator  the mechanism  of
   recovering costs for cleanup.

 Each of these reasons  is discussed  below.

 CERCLA Section  101(14)  Lists  Are  Not All
 Inclusive.   Many substances which  are
 hazardous  to the public do  not necessarily
 qualify to  be on the lists  Congress
 identified  in CERCLA Section  101(14).
 Those lists  were developed  to protect a
 single medium,  or,  in the  case of hazardous
 wastes, to  protect the public from improper
 disposal and other mishandling of hazardous
 wastes.  Each of the lists  is responsive to
 one or more sections of environmental
 statutes, i.e.,  the Clean  Air Act, the
 Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal
 Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act.
 To meet the  Congressional  requirements of
 those acts,  the Agency developed technical
                                             -204-

-------
 criteria to be applied to chemicals and/or
 wastes.  These criteria were designed to
 specifically  meet certain requirements of
 the acts.

 Congress anticipated that by providing a
 multiplicity of lists, taken from several
 regulations developed pursuant to the acts
 discussed above, most substances which
 provide increased risks to the public,
 welfare and environment would be covered.
 However, Congress recognized that the
 umbrella of these four major environmental
 acts might not cover all  the substances from
 which the public should be protected (e.g.,
 Congress did not include  the Federal
 Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
 [FIFRA] active ingredients).   Accordingly,
 Congress gave the Administrator authority to
 designate additional  substances as  CERCLA
 HS,  thus removing the media constraints from
 the  Administrator in  designating HS.

 Designation Encourages Safer Handling
 Procedures.  Experience has shown that
 liability for cleanup, pursuant to  Section
 107  of CERCLA,  has made handlers of HS more
 cognizant of the risks HS  pose  to the
 public.   Accordingly,  more attention is  paid
 to handling,  packaging, shipping, storage,
 and  general  treatment  of HS.  Thus,  there  is
 a tendency  for  industry to treat designated
 HS in  a  safer manner  than  pollutants and
 contaminants.

 Designation  Encourages  Recycling.  Many
 chemicals  produced, used,  or  processed  by
 manufacturers often are discarded when  they
 become contaminated or otherwise  out of
 specification.  Frequently,  it is  more
 economical  to discard  the  chemical than to
 recycle  it.  Discarding, of course,  does not
 eliminate the chemical; usually  it is  sent
 to a landfill.   If the chemical  is a
 pollutant or contaminant it may  go to a
 sanitary  landfill where it can eventually
migrate to  ground waters or perhaps  become
airborne. If that chemical does not  pose a
threat to the health, welfare or
environment, then disposal in a landfill is
both economical and safe.  However,  if the
chemical does pose a threat, in the  absence
of regulation, it can still be discarded in
a sanitary landfill at a relatively  low
cost.  On the other hand,  if that substance
is a designated HS, disposal in a sanitary
landfill is not acceptable, and the cost of
disposal in a suitable landfill  is high.  In
most cases the cost of disposal  can exceed
the cost of recycling.  Hence, in order to
 encourage industry to both conserve
 resources and to protect the public health,
 welfare and the environment, substances
 which do pose threats should be designated
 as HS to reduce the total quantity of those
 undesignated but harmful substances in
 waste disposal sites.

 Designation Provides the Administrator the
 Mechanism for Recovering Costs of Cleanup.
 Section 106 of CERCLA provides the EPA with
 a mechanism to recover government costs for
 cleanup of spills of HS from owners or
 operators, or from other responsible
 parties.  CERCLA does not provide a
 mechanism for cost recovery if the
 substance for which remedial  action was
 taken is not a CERCLA HS.  Furthermore,
 owners or operators can be liable for up to
 $50 million  for damage to the environment
 caused by releases of HS.  No such
 liability exists for damage due to releases
 of non-CERCLA HS.   Therefore, in order to
 protect the  SUPERFUND and to  correct
 environmental  damages, it is  incumbent on
 the Administrator  to  designate  as  HS those
 substances which when released  into the
 environment  are likely to trigger  a
 government response.

 Candidate  Substances  for Designation from
 SARA                   ;	:	

      Both  Title  III of SARA (Emergency
 Planning and  Community Right-to-Know Act)
 and Title  I of  SARA  (Provisions  Relating
 Primarily to  Response  and Liability)
 provide  source  lists  the  Agency  is
 considering for  designation purposes.

 The Extremely Hazardous Substances.
 Section  302  defines  the  specific  list of
 Extremely Hazardous Substances  (EHS) and
 requires the Agency to publish the  list
 within 30 days after  the  enactment of SARA.
 The list of EHS  is defined as "the  list of
 substances published  in November,  1985 by
 the Administrator in Appendix A of the
 Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program
 Interim  Guidance."  This  list was
 established by the Agency to  identify
 chemical substances which could cause
 irreversible health effects from accidental
 releases.  Any facility making, using or
 storing  EHS above a promulgated threshold
 planning quantity must report the quantity
 to  the Local  Emergency Planning Committee
 (LEPC).  Furthermore, a release of an EHS
must be reported to the LEPC if the release
 is  in a quantity at or above the
                                            -205-

-------
promulgated release notification quantity.
If the EHS is also a HS the release quantity
is the RQ of the HS.  In the event that the
EHS is not a HS the release notification
value is that value promulgated in the April
22, 1987 Final Rule (52 £R 13378 - 13410).
However, there is a subtle difference
between notification requirements of Section
304 and Section 103.  In Section 304,
notification must be made only if the
release leaves or threatens to leave the
perimeter of the facility, whereas in
Section 103, notification to the NRC must be
made if the release is into the environment.
Thus, the perimeter of the facility is not a
constraint for notification requirements
under Section 103.  EPA published the list
Of 402 EHS on November 17, 1986 (51 £R 41570
- 41592) in an Interim Final Rule, and on
the same date, published an NPRM which
proposed the addition of five substances to
the list of EHS, and the deletion of 40
substances from the list of EHS (51 _FR 41593
- 41594).  The criteria that are the basis
of the list of EHS are provided in Table 1.

     On April 22, 1987, EPA published a
Final Rule which revised the list of EHS to
include four additional substances.  The
Agency had decided to retain the 40
substances proposed for deletion pending the
development of criteria for determining
additional health effects resulting from
short-term exposure at specified levels.
EPA intends to reassess these 40 chemicals
when such criteria are available.

     The Agency applied the criteria shown
in Table 1 to the data base of chemicals
contained in the Registry of Toxic Effects
of Chemical Substances (RTECS) and applied
the additional criterion that the EHS had to
be in current production.   In addition, the
Agency  included substances  on the EHS list
that did not meet all of the formal criteria
discussed above, but are in high production
and have caused death and injury in
accidents.

     There are currently 406 substances on
the list of EHS of  which 145 are also CERCLA
HS.  Therefore, 261 EHS are candidates  for
designation as HS.

     The Agency is  considering designating
these  261 EHS as CERCLA HS  to ensure that
releases of these substances are  reported to
the NRC  for  possible  response by the Federal
government, and to  protect  the SUPERFUND
against response costs associated with
releases of non-designated HS.

The Toxic Chemicals.  Another list of
chemicals defined in SARA that the Agency
is considering for designation purposes is
the list of toxic chemicals defined in
Section 313 of SARA (Toxic Chemical Release
Forms) as those chemicals listed in
Committee Print Number 99-169 of the Senate
Committee on Environment and Public Works,
titled "Toxic Chemicals Subject to Section
313 of the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act of 1986," including any
revised version of the list as may be made
pursuant to subsection (d) or (e) of
Section 313 of Title III of SARA.  The
Administrator  may by rule add a chemical
if there is sufficient evidence to
establish that: 1) the chemical is known to
cause or can reasonably be anticipated to
cause significant adverse acute human
health effects at concentration levels that
are reasonably likely to exist beyond
facility site boundaries as a result of
continuous, or frequently recurring
releases; 2) the chemical is known to cause
or can reasonably be anticipated to cause
cancer in humans or teratogenic effects, or
serious irreversible reproduction
dysfunctions, neurological disorders,
heritable genetic mutations, or other
chronic health effects; or 3) the chemical
is known to cause or can reasonably be
expected to cause, because of its toxicity,
its toxicity and persistence in the
environment, or its toxicity and tendency
to bioaccumulate in the environment,
significant adverse effects on the
environment of sufficient seriousness to
cause reporting under Section 313 of Title
III of SARA.  In addition, any person may
petition the Administrator to add a
chemical to the list of toxic chemicals.

     The owner or operator of a  facility
subject to  the requirements of this section
of Title III of SARA must complete a toxic
chemical release form for each toxic
chemical listed that was manufactured,
processed,  or otherwise used  in  quantities
exceeding the toxic chemical  threshold
quantity defined in Section 313(f).  Draft
release  forms have  been distributed to  the
public  for  comment.

      There  are currently  329  substances  on
the SARA Section 313  toxic chemicals  list.
The Agency  may designate  some  or  all of  the
substances  on this  list as CERCLA HS.
                                            -206-

-------
 The Hazardous Waste Site Substances.
 Section 110 of SARA (Health-Related
 Authorities) requires that the
 Administrators of both the EPA and the
 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
 Registry (ATSDR) prepare a list of at least
 100 HS which are most commonly found at
 facilities on the National Priorities List
 (NPL)  and which they determine are posing
 the most significant potential threat to
 human  health due to their known or suspected
 toxicity to humans and the potential for
 human  exposure to such substances at
 facilities on the NPL or at facilities to
 which  a response to a release or a
 threatened release is under consideration.
 This section also provides for regular
 additions  to this list.   The Administrator
 of the ATSDR must prepare toxicological
 profiles  of each of these substances.

     The  Agency may designate as  hazardous
 those  Section 110 substances  that are not
 already HS  to protect the Superfund against
 response  costs  associated with releases  on
 non-designated  chemicals.

 Other  Candidate Substances  for Designation

     In addition  to  the  lists  identified
 above  that  contain  chemicals  that  are
 candidates  for  designation,  the Agency has
 identified  a  number  of other  lists  that may
 contain chemicals  that should  be designated
 as  HS.  These list  include  but are  not
 limited to  :

 *   The  Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and
    Rodenticide  Act  (FIFRA) active
    ingredients;

 *   The Occupational Safety and Health
    Administration  (OSHA) substances, i.e.,
    those substances requiring  a Material
    Safety Data Sheet.

 *   Carcinogens  identified by the Carcinogen
    Assessment Group, the Office of Toxic
    Substances and other Agency offices, as
   well as those identified by the National
   Toxicology Program  (NTP) and the
    International Agency for Research on
   Cancer (IARC); and

     The Agency may develop a priority-
setting process for selecting substances
from the lists that are of greatest concern
to the  CERCLA program and focus its
resources on those highest priority
substances that are most likely to present a
 threat to public health or welfare or the
 environment.  Criteria which could be
 applied to the lists of chemicals for
 purposes of prioritization includes degree
 of replication of a .substances on various
 lists, the level of production of a
 substance, the RQ which would be assigned
 to a substance using the RQ Adjustment
 Methodology, the substances'  history of
 release and the environmental mobility and
 persistency of a substance.

 Options for Designation

      The Agency is  considering a number of
 options for implementing its  designation
 strategy.   It  is cognizant of the
 regulatory burden imposed  by  designation,
 and  at the same time is concerned that a
 number of chemicals  are released or have
 the  potential  of being  released which  are
 not  currently  CERCLA HS, and  therefore,  are
 not  reported at the  federal level.

      The  Agency is currently  considering
 several  strategies for  designation,
 including  a  limited  designation strategy
 whereby only those chemicals  on the  lists
 identified  above  from SARA would  be
 considered  for  designation, with  emphasis
 on the Extremely  Hazardous  Substances.   The
 Agency may  further prioritize  these  lists
 to designate only the most  dangerous of  the
 chemicals.   The Agency  is  also  considering
 a broader designation methodology that
 would  include other  lists  in addition  to
 those  from SARA as sources  of candidate
 substances.  These options  will  be
 presented and public comments solicited  in
 an NPRM to be published in  the  latter  part
 of 1987.

 REFERENCES

 1. Kooyoomjian, J.K., R. Field, S. Gibson,
   M.  Kirsch, and G. Ricci, 1986.
   Reportable Quantity Guidelines for
   CERCLA - Designated Chemicals.
   Proceedings  of the Twelfth Annual
   Research Symposium on Land Disposal,
   Remedial Action, Incineration an?
   Treatment of Hazardous Waste.  US
   Environmental Protection Agency,
   Cincinnati,  Ohio,  pp90-98.

2. Technical Background Document to Support
   Rulemaking Pursuant to CERCLA Section
   102, Volume  1.  March 1985.  Prepared
   under contract No. 68-03-3182 to the US
   Environmental Protection Agency.
                                           -207-

-------
Technical Background Document to Support
Rulemaking Pursuant to CERCLA Section
102. Volume"^August 1986.Prepared
under contract No. 68-03-3182 to the US
Environmental Protection Agency.

Technical Background Document to Support
Rulemaking Pursuant to CERCLA Section
'102. Volume"!!December 1986.Prepared
under contract No. 68-03-3182 to the US
Environmental Protection Agency.
                                          -208-

-------
          Route of
          Exposure *
            Acute Toxicity Measure **
Value
          Inhalation
            Median Lethal
            Concentration in Air
            (LC50).
                                                       Less than or equal to
                                                       0.5 milligrams per liter
                                                       of air.
          Dermal
          Oral
            Median Lethal Dose
            (LD50).
            Median Lethal Dose
            (LD50).
Less than or equal to 50
milligrams per kilogram
of body weight.

Less than or equal to 25
milligrams per kilograms
of body weight.
Table 1.
Criteria to Identify Acutely Toxic Chemicals that may Present Severe Health
Hazards to Humans During a Chemical Accident or Other Emergency.
   The route by which the test animals absorbed, the chemical,  i.e.  by breathing in  air
   (inhalation), by absorbing it through the skin (dermal),  or by ingestion  (oral).

   LC50:  The concentration of the chemical  in air.at which  50  percent of the test animals
   died.   LD50: The dose which killed 50 percent of the  test animals.  In absence of LC50
   or LD50 data, LClo or LDlo data should be used.  LClo:  Lethal  Concentration  Low,  the
   lowest concentration  in air at which any test animals died.   LDlo: Lethal  Dose Low, the
   lowest dose  at which  any test animals died.
                                           -209-

-------
                 THE EPA PERSONNEL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH PROGRAM

                                     Michael D. Royer
                                  Releases Control Branch
                      Hazardous Waste  Engineering Research  Laboratory
                           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                     Edison, NJ  08837


                                         ABSTRACT

     The Environmental  Protection Agency's Personnel Protection Technology Research
Program provides data,  information and technology to enhance the Agency's capability to
perform its mandated roles that require:  1) regulation of  pesticides  and toxic
substance handling  and  use;  and 2) operation of EPA and contractor  personnel  at chemical
spills and uncontrolled hazardous waste  sites.  To meet this objective, the  Program is
developing, evaluating  and improving chemical protective clothing and  equipment;
procedures to  enhance the safety and cost-efficiency  of working conditions;  methods to
predict the effectiveness of chemical  protective clothing;  and detection methods  and
devices that warn of imminent hazards  to life and health.
INTRODUCTION

     The Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) Personnel
Protection Technology Research
Program supports the activities of
the:  1) Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP) mandated by the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 2) Office
of Toxic Substances (OTS) mandated
by the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA) and 3) Office of
Emergency and Remedial
Response(OERR) mandated by the
Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA or
Superfund).  The Program is
principally funded by the Water
Engineering Research Laboratory
and the Hazardous Waste
Engineering Research Laboratory
(HWERL); HWERL provides technical
management support.

     Pursuant to FIFRA, OPP is
responsible for developing
agricultural protective clothing
regulations, implementing the
pesticide registration process,
reviewing and approving pesticide
labels, administering the
pesticide-related Farm Safety
Program, and supporting training
and education programs for
pesticide users through state
extension services.  These efforts
are aimed at improving levels of
protection for the estimated 4
million farmers, farm workers and
farm families who may be directly
and chronically exposed to
pesticide sprays, dusts and
ambient residues.  Program
research in this area currently
focuses on evaluating the
effectiveness of protective
clothing for pesticide mixers,
loaders, and applicators.

     TSCA and subsequent
regulations require that producers
or importers of new chemicals
submit  a Premanufacture
Notification (PMN) to OTS at least
90 days prior to beginning
manufacture or distribution.  OTS
must review the PMN, which may
include a description of the
protective clothing and
respirators to be used, within 90
days and determine whether
                                           -210-

-------
 production of the new chemical
 will  result in unacceptable health
 or environmental  risks.   Program
 efforts in this area currently
 focus on developing improved
 methodologies (i.e., test methods,
 predictive methods, and  integrated
 systems) to estimate the
 effectiveness of respirators and
 protective garments.

      Under the provisions of SARA,
 the EPA performs  a variety of
 roles that affect (or are affected
 by) personnel  protection
 technology.  These include
 procuring and using (both directly
 and through contractors)
 protective clothing and  equipment
 for laboratory and field
 operations, developing and
 reviewing site safety plans,  and
 preparing and presenting safety
 training courses  for EPA employees
 and client organizations.  Program
 efforts in this area focus on
 improving personnel  protection
 technology in  order to  enhance
 the safety, range,  and cost
 effectiveness  of  operations at
 Superfund sites.

      All  of the above research
 efforts are performed through
 contracts,  cooperative agreements
 with  state universities,
 interagency agreements,  in-house
 projects,  technology transfer
 workshops and  active coordination
 with  researchers,  manufacturers
 and users in the  personnel
 protection area.   Through  these
 mechanisms,  the Program:   1)
 conducts  desk-top,  laboratory and
 field evaluations;  2)  prepares
 guidance  documents  on  the
 selection  and  appropriate  uses of
 protective  clothing  and  equipment;
 3)  evaluates,  develops and
 verifies  methods  for predicting
 and testing the performance of
 these products; 4)  analyzes the
 costs and  benefits of  alternative
 technologies;  and 5)  identifies
 research  results that will
 significantly  enhance  EPA
 operations  involving hazardous
materials.  Table 1 summarizes the
 outputs of these activities
 through June 1987.
 RESEARCH  IN  SUPPORT OF
 FIFRA-MANDATED  OPP ACTIVITIES

      To support OPP's
 FIFRA-mandated  responsibilities,
 the  Personnel Protection  Research
 Program has  initiated research
 projects  in  three  areas:
 laboratory evaluations  and  field
 tests of  protective clothing
 effectiveness,  and production of
 guidance  manuals on the selection
 of protective clothing  for
 agricultural pesticide  operations.

      Previous efforts by  the OPP
 and  others have confirmed that the
 hands are an important  site of
 pesticide exposure,  and research
 has  demonstrated that chemicals
 can  permeate "impermeable"  gloves
 without degrading  their physical
 characteristics.   To aid  OPP and
 pesticide users to identify gloves
 that will provide  adequate
 protection,  EPA contracted  Arthur
 D. Little, Inc., to: 1) produce,
 assemble  and evaluate data  on the
 effectiveness of polymer  gloves
 against pesticide  exposures, and
 2) identify correlations  in the
 collected data  that  will
 facilitate glove selection.  Three
 types  of  testing are being
 employed  in this project:   two
 "rapid screening"  procedures to
 eliminate glove-chemical
 combinations that  result  in
 observable, rapid  degradation of
 glove  polymers  and ASTM method
 F-739-85  to test for permeation.

     Degradation tests on 92
 pesticide-glove combinations have
 been completed  and at least 60
 combinations are being selected
 for  subsequent  permeation testing.
 Permeation tests on  two pesticides
 are  in progress.  As the project
 proceeds,  the two rapid screening
 tests will be compared and the
more satisfactory will  be selected
 for future use.   Also,  pesticides
which have low water solubility
 and volatility do not lend
themselves to the ASTM permeation
test due to the difficulty of
collecting the permeant after it
 has passed through the glove
 sample. An effort is underway to
                                           -211-

-------
identify alternative methods for
collecting the permeant.

     Thermal comfort is a key
factor in the selection of
chemical protective garments for
agricultural operations.  Existing
protective clothing provides a
trade-off between thermal comfort
and pesticide penetration
resistance.  To obtain a better
understanding of this trade-off,
EPA entered a cooperative
agreement with the University of
Tennessee under which 40 fabrics
were screened for thermal comfort
properties and 32 were tested for
penetration resistance against
four pesticide formulations:
Dicofol, Ethion, Chiorobenzilate
and Terrazole.  The results of
this work will be used to identify
fabrics with superior combinations
of thermal comfort and penetration
resistance.  These fabrics will be
fabricated into coveralls and
field tested by citrus and
greenhouse workers as one part of
a cooperative agreement between
EPA and the University of Florida.

     Under this agreement,  the
University of Florida  is
investigating the dermal pesticide
exposure received by greenhouse
workers and the mitigation  of that
exposure through the use of
protective clothing.   In phase  I
of the  field test,  raw data was
collected by having pesticide
sprayers wear collection patches
on the  inside and outside of their
clothes.  The patches  were  then
removed and  subjected  to
extraction  and  chemical  analysis.
In addition,  pesticides were
removed from the  hands with
ethanol  rinses  and  breathing zone
air  was sampled.  Approximately
3000 pesticide  samples were
generated  in this phase, which
included  various  application
methods (e.g.,  tractor-drawn boom
and  span,  handgun,  pulse fog and
drench  spraying)  in various
settings  (e.g.,  open,  enclosed  and
partially enclosed  greenhouses).
 In the  second phase,  begun  in
September 1986  and  to  be completed
soon, the effectiveness of  work
pants, long-sleeved shirts,
T-shirts and two commercial brands
of coveralls will be evaluated.
Field evaluations of the fabrics
identified in the University of
Tennessee study have also begun
and will continue through 1988.

      In addition to these field
and laboratory evaluations, the
Personnel Protection Research
Program has also initiated
development of a Guidance Manual
for Selecting Protective Clothing
for Agricultural Pesticide
Operations, with Arthur D. Little,
Inc., serving as the contractor on
the project.  In the first phase
of this effort,  an  Interim
Guidance Manual  (IGM) was prepared
as an internal resource document
for the OPP.  The  IGM focuses  on
assessments of the  effectiveness
of polymer gloves  against
pesticide exposure  and of the
limitations,  imposed by thermal
comfort  needs, on  the use  of
protective garments in
agricultural  pesticide operations.
The  IGM  has been circulated among
the  research  and user community,
and  the  scope of the final
Guidance Manual  will be based  on
their comments,  and on those of
OPP.  Topics  in  the final  version
may  include:  work task functional
requirements; manufacturing
methods  and materials; performance
data; human factors data;  product
lists;  decontamination agents  and
methods;  and  foot,  eye, head,
forearm/arm and  respiratory
protection.

 RESEARCH IN SUPPORT OF
 TSCA-MANDATED OTS ACTIVITIES

      Because OTS is limited to 90
 days to complete a PMN review, and
 because they want to minimize
 additional testing by
 manufacturers, the Office requires
 reliable model(s) or system(s) for
 predicting the effectiveness of
 protective clothing and
 respirators  in the workplace.
 Therefore, to support these needs,
 the  Personnel Protection Research
 Program is evaluating and
 improving methods, equipment  and
                                            -212-

-------
procedures for estimating the
exposure protection provided by
these products.  As methods are
identified or developed, they are
being incorporated into the PMN
review process, giving OTS the
opportunity to provide prompt
feedback.

     In the first phase of these
model development efforts several
theoretical permeation models and
test methods for estimating
permeation related properties were
identified and compared to the
results of permeation tests.  The
models and test methods chosen
were based on theories of the
solution thermodynamics of
polymer/solvent systems and the
diffusion of solvents in polymers.
The contractor further developed
these models and test methods to
estimate the solubility (S) and
the diffusion coefficient (D) for
a solvent in a glove polymer.
Given S and D, the permeation of a
glove by a solvent can be
predicted for various exposure
conditions using analytical or
numerical solutions to Pick's
1 aws.

     Based on this work, a
computer model (written in Fortran
and operable on an IBM PC) was
developed and delivered to OTS for
hands-on evaluation.  Using simple
inputs, this program can calculate
S and D, and generate curves used
in estimating the barrier
effectiveness of protective
garment materials.  Also, the
capabilities and reporting
requirements of existing
permeation test methods were
analyzed and a preliminary
hierarchy for test method
specification was proposed.
Analyses of immersion and vapor
sorption tests are underway and
development of a splash test
method, in cooperation with
standards development
organizations, will be pursued in
1987.  The results of these
efforts, which will continue
through 1989, will be integrated
into a system that will enhance
the performance of PMN reviews.
     In addition to evaluating the
effectiveness of protective
clothing, OTS must also assess the
likely effectiveness of any
respirators included in a PMN.
Research to enhance OTS
capabilities in this area is being
conducted through an interagency
agreement with the National
Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH).  This research
will determine the workplace
protection factors of respirators,
develop laboratory test methods to
predict these factors and
establish a decision logic for OTS
evaluation of PMN submittals
involving respirators.

     The initial phase of this
work involved an assessment of
quantitative fit test methods,
which measure the effectiveness of
a respirator by comparing the
concentration of a test
contaminant inside the facepiece
to that outside.  The reliability
of this test is critical to
meaningful measurements of
workplace protection factors, and
to individuals who use fit test
data to select respirators.
Laboratory evaluations
demonstrated that the measured
protection factor can be strongly
biased by the position of the
sampling probe and the location of
leaks into the facepiece.  Work in
1987 will focus on eliminating
this bias.

RESEARCH IN SUPPORT OF
SARA-MANDATED EPA ACTIVITIES

     A number of Personnel
Protection Research Program
projects support SARA-related
hazardous waste site cleanup and
emergency spill response
activities.  These projects are
identifying, evaluating and
improving prototypical and
commercially available chemical
protective materials, clothing and
equipment, and related procedures,
that could potentially improve the
safety, range, and
cost-effectiveness of EPA and
EPA-contractor operations at
chemical spill and uncontrolled
                                           -213-

-------
hazardous waste sites.  Products
of particular interest include
disposable protective clothing,
vital signs monitors, personal
cooling devices, respiratory
protection devices, new garment
materials, totally encapsulating
ensembles and personal
communication devices.

     Recent Program efforts to
evaluate and improve protective
clothing materials include an
assessment of the stiffness and
strength of Teflon /Nomex
laminate (a newly available
material resistant to a wide range
of chemical compounds) at cold
temperatures and an investigation
of the permeation and degradation
resistance of a 20 mil chlorinated
polyethylene (CPE) to liquid
chemicals.  In the latter project,
CPE swatches were exposed to ten
chemicals (acetic acid, acetic
anhydride, acetone, bis
(2-chloroethyl) ether, carbon
tetrachloride, ethylene diamine,
isopropyl alcohol,
nitrosodimethylamine, phenol and
xylene) in order to determine
permeation rates, breakthrough
times and swelling.  Mean
permeation breakthrough times ,
ranged from 0 to 170 mg'm" 's~ ,
and swelling and solubility data
also showed wide variation,
depending upon the chemical.
Soaking CPE test swatches in one
chemical resulted in a loss of
weight, while contact with four
other compounds resulted in weight
gains of over 100% by CPE.  In
eight out of ten cases chemical
contact also reduced the capacity
of CPE to resist tearing.

     In an interagency effort with
the U.S. Army's Chemical Research
and Development Center, advanced
development of a prototype,
long-term (2.5 hour),
self-contained, chemical
protective ensemble  (based on an
existing Army/Coast Guard
prototype) was pursued. The
ensemble development was performed
by USD Corporation.  Some
desirable modifications (e.g.,
lighter weight, simplified
 maintenance and 2.5-hr service
 life)  were attained,  but the
 breathing apparatus failed NIOSH
 certification testing twice.   No
 additional  attempts to obtain
 certification are planned.  In
.related projects, the high
 pressure oxygen compatibility  of
 the apparatus' materials of
 construction and the
 state-of-know!edge of the
 physiological effects of routinely
 breathing high concentrations  of
 oxygen were evaluated.

     Other recently completed
 Program efforts to improve
 equipment include a preliminary
 investigation of critical  design
 features of back-mounted equipment
 (to minimize risk of back
 injuries) and a field evaluation
 of three recently developed vital
 signs  monitors, which are used in
 heat stress management programs  at
 site cleanup operations. This
 evaluation was conducted at a
 dioxin cleanup site in Missouri  to
 assess the monitors'  ease of use,
 suitability for field operations
 and accuracy.  Further evaluations
 of vital signs monitors and
 evaluations of personal cooling
 systems are planned for early  1987
 in order to develop modified heat
 stress management work practices.

     Also in 1987, a project will
 begin  to identify and evaluate
 commercially available or
 prototypical personal hazard
 detectors.  This effort will
 involve desk-top, laboratory and
 field  evaluations of personal
 toxic  gas, combustible gas and
 oxygen deficiency detectors.
 Evaluation criteria will include
 reliability, ease of use,
 sensitivity, portability, cost and
 safety.  Initial results indicate
 that,  under field conditions,
 currently available detectors
 exhibit some generic failure
 modes:  failure below 0 C and  in
 precipitation, lack of portability
 and sensitivity, and selectivity
 (or lack thereof).

     With regard to evaluating and
 improving personnel protective
                                           -214-

-------
procedures for Superfund
operations, two  Program efforts
are underway:  development of a
field test kit for protective
clothing and evaluation of
decontamination  agents and
methods.  The field test kit has
been laboratory  tested and the
results compared to those obtained
using ASTM Method F-739-85
(permeation test method).  Three
kits are undergoing field testing
by EPA response groups.  The kit
is relatively inexpensive and
readily field usable:  Liquid
waste is placed  in a shallow cup,
the cup is covered by a swatch of
clothing material and inverted,
and the rate of permeation is
monitored gravimetrically using a
two-place, battery-powered
balance.

COORDINATION ACTIVITIES

     In a critically important set
of activities, the Personnel
Protection Research Program
continually promotes the transfer
-- both inward and outward --of
information on personnel
protection research needs,
activities, plans and outputs;
analyzes EPA needs in this area;
and sponsors investigations of the
state-of-the-art in this field.
Specific coordination and
technology transfer activities in
1987 will include:  continuing
active participation in ASTM
Committee F-23 on Protective
Clothing, making presentations on
research progress at the Second
International Symposium on the
Performance of Protective Clothing
and the American Industrial
Hygiene Conference, participating
in an Interagency Memorandum of
Understanding Work Group with
representatives of the U.S. Coast
Guard, NIOSH, Occupational  Safety
and Health Administration and
Federal  Emergency Management
Agency;  conducting a second
intra-EPA Workshop on Personnel
Protection Research and Research
Needs; and participating on the
American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists
Committee on Agricultural Health
and Safety.

     Similar activities are
planned  at least through 1991,  and
are expected to continue to
provide  ideas and information of
value to the planning and
performance of personnel
protection research in support of
EPA's needs.
                                           -215-

-------
          TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF EPA PERSONNEL PROTECTION PROGRAM OUTPUTS
Title
Long-term, Self-contained Chemical Protective Ensemble
el f- i ned
Decontamination Techniques for Mobile Response Equipment Used at
Waste Sites
Evaluation of Chlorinated Polyethylene Protective Garment Material
Test Methods to Predict the Permeation of Polymers by Organic Solvents
Interim Protocol for Diving Operations in Contaminated Water
Predicting the Effectiveness of Chemical Protective Clothing-- Model
and Test Method Development
Biases Associated with In-facepiece Sampling of Respirators
Interim Guidance Manual for Selecting Protective Clothing for
Agricultural Pesticide Operations
Review of Models for Predicting the Effectiveness of Protective Clothing
Effect of Fabric Weight and Thickness on Pesticide Penetration
Evaluation of Protective Clothing for Agricultural Pesticide Operations
Predicting Breakthrough of Chemicals through Protective Clothing
Field Evaluation of Protective Clothing: Experimental Design
Field Test Method to Evaluate Protective Clothing
Interpretation of the Results of Permeation Testing
Evaluation of Protective Gloves Used in Agricultural Pesticide Operations
Product
Type*
CP
PR,S
PR,S
CP
PR,S
PR,S
PR,S
IR
OP
IR
CP
CP
CP
CP ,
CP
OP
OP
Date
5/84
8/85
12/85
1/86
8/86
9/86
9/86
9/86
6/87
12/86
1/87
1/87
1/87
1/87
2/87
6/87
6/87

*OP - oral presentation, CP = article in conference proceedings,
 PR,S » project report and summary, and IR = internal report
                                          -216-

-------
                      APPLICATION OPPORTUNITIES  FOR CANINE  OLFACTION:
                         EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION  AND  LEAKING  TANKS

                Herbert  S.  Skovronek,  Barbara  Kebbekus,  and Stewart Messur,
                    New  Oersey  Institute  of Technology,  Newark,  N3 07102
                  Lorenz D.  Arner,  Biosensors,  Inc., Skippach,  PA 19474
             Hugh  Masters,  US Environmental Protection  Agency,  Edison,  NO  08837


                                         ABSTRACT

       Rapid  screening of heavy equipment used in site  cleanup  for residual contamination
 and  scanning of underground  storage tanks  for leaks were identified as two promising
 environmental applications for canine olfaction.

       In equipment  decontamination, the  objective  was  to demonstrate that a trained dog
 could  detect and  indicate  extremely small  residues of  hazardous chemicals remaining on
 heavy  equipment such  as  bulldozers, baekhoes  and front  end loaders after  washup.  Using
 xylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane as models of common hazardous chemicals, a trained dog
 reliably indicated  hidden  samples emitting as little as 0.5 ug/min.  Gaussian dispersion
 models Indicated  that the  dog is detecting 5-10 ppt or  less at these emission rates.
 Field  tests  on  equipment indicated  detection  at emission rates as low  as  1 ng/min.

       From tests  to evaluate the dog's ability to  differentiate similar compounds, it was
 concluded that, at  least in  some compound  families, the dog does respond  to both the
 compound used for training and its  congeners.  This capability may be  useful in finding
 any members  of  such families at  a site.

       Gasoline  was  selected as the  material of greatest importance when searching for
 underground  leaks.  Water-washed gasoline,  used to  simulate underground leaks, did exhibit
 minor  changes in composition.  However,  possibly due to the training approach used, the
 dog was unable  to differentiate  the washed  gas from unwashed gasoline.  Alternate
 approaches are  delineated  for future  study.
INTRODUCTION

       Passage of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response Compensation
and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), common-
ly known as Superfund, and most recently,
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
tion Act of 1986 (SARA), has placed great
emphasis on the cleanup of hazardous waste
sites and spills.  Careful and complete
delineation and monitoring of such sites,
both before and after cleanup, have become
increasingly important.  The cost and
complexity of such monitoring programs have
been far from inconsequential and have led
to the development, testing, and use of
highly sophisticated analytical equipment
to provide more reliable results more
quickly and at lower ambient levels.  In
some cases, however, highly sophisticated
technology is used solely because it is the
only or the fastest approach accepted by
the technical and regulatory community,
even when precise data are not needed.

      In 1983, an alternate, innovative
approach to monitoring was brought to the
attention of the Edison, NO Releases
Control Branch of EPA's Hazardous Waste
Environmental Research Laboratory (Cinc-
innati).  The technique, canine olfaction,
                                          -217-

-------
 has  attained  wide  acceptance  as  an  aid  to
 the  military, to police, to rescue  workers,
 to custom agents,  and to certain industries
 to detect explosives, weapons, personnel,
 narcotics,  leaking gas, underground pockets
 of leaking cable oils, and even  termites,
 often  under conditions WHERE  NO  OTHER TECH-
 NOLOGY IS EQUALLY  CAPABLE.  In some of
 these  areas,  the dog remains  the "state-of-
 the-art".

       The results  of a preliminary  study
 funded by US  EPA's Releases Control  Branch
 in 1983 to  study the feasibility of the
 technique and the  breadth of  its potential
 applications  essentially confirmed
 expectations  (1).  The dog was,  if  any-
 thing,  more sensitive to chemical vapors
 than expected, detecting "plumes" from
 nuniscule samples  at considerable distances
 and tracking them  back to their  sources;
 potentially providing environmental  workers
 with a tool to zero in on contamination
 very quickly  so that quantitation could
 then be carried out in the most  cost-
 effective manner and without  numerous "not
 detected" results.  A great deal  also was
 learned about the  techniques  suitable for
 training dogs for  such work,  environ-
mental  situations  where a dog might  be
 useful  and  the reluctance of  regulators,
 contractors, analysts, and others
 accustomed  to dealing with instruments  and
 numerical results.

      The current  Cooperative Agreement (2)
 between the USEPA  and the New Gersey
 Institute of Technology was undertaken  to
explore the dog's  ability to work usefully
 in two  different areas of considerable
 interest to USEPA, cleanup contractors, and
state agencies.  These two problem areas
were:

  1.  Assessing the effectiveness of heavy
  equipment decontamination after use at a
  site; and

  2.   Non-invasive screening for leaks  from
  underground storage tanks (UST),
  particularly those containing gasoline.

      While there have been no applications
of the dog  in the environmental field per
se,  there have been a number of reports
that really fit this category.  Dogs were
used to detect 150 leaks,  some too small to
confirm with conventional  instrumentation,
over the 94 mile length of a new natural
gas pipeline across Canada, all within a
 two-week  period  (3).  They  also were used
 to  locate leaks  of electrical cable oils
 below  the paved  streets of  New York City
 (4).   Experiments have even demonstrated
 that dogs were able to detect nitrogen,
 Freon,  and helium gas emanating from a
 manifold  system  (5).

       For the two phases of this project,
 "decontamination" and "UST", two chemicals
 were selected to represent  hazardous
 materials commonly encountered at sites.
 These  were m-xylene and 1,1,1-trichloro-
 ethane (TCE).  Xylene was chosen as a less
 volatile,  less toxic representative of the
 aromatic  solvents benzene and toluene
 frequently encountered at spills and
 cleanup sites.   Of course,  xylene is also a
 component of gasoline and fuel oil.
 Similarly, the non-carcinogenic
 trichloroethane  was chosen  to represent the
 chlorinated hydrocarbons frequently found
 in  contaminated  groundwater and attributed
 to  industrial degreasing operations.

       The project was carried out with one
 primary dog, a 5-year old German Shepherd
 Dog, Ramos, who  had already demonstrated
 his ability and  desire to do scent work in
 other  areas.  Ramos was trained and handled
 by Mr. L.  Don Arner.  A second dog, a
 female German Shepherd Dog  named Anja, and
 her handler, Mr. Don Bowman, were brought
 into the  project later for  specific
 segments.

      The  training protocol relied on
 positive  reinforcement (reward of some
 type) for  all successes, no matter how
 slight and the withholding  of reward for
 failure (negative reinforcement).  Rarely
 if ever was discipline (aversion training)
 necessary.  The training further used a
 technique  called "chaining" in which each
 small segment of the training is taught
 separately and only combined as the dog
 succeeds with the first effort.  For
 example, the dog,learns to  search,  he
 learns to  detect a specific odor, he learns
 to respond by pawing or retrieving.   Each
 dog was taught to recognize a particular
 scent,  that of the target chemical,  by
 introducing the dog to a somewhat higher
 level of the chemical (up to 0.5 gm)
 protected  in a hollow wooden dowel  or a 35
mm film canister and rewarding the dog for
the very first alert or recognition.  The
amount of chemical was then rapidly reduced
 and/or the difficulty of finding the source
of the chemical  was increased.   In  fact,
                                          -218-

-------
the dog quickly learned to recognize and
detect both target chemicals (TCE, xylene),
even when the source was reduced to one
drop (about 0.05 gm).  Because of the
project's goals, the objective was to
develop the dog's ability to detect low
concentrations of the vapor rather than his
ability to recognize aged samples or track
an aged scent great distances, as had been
demonstrated in the earlier study.

      Calculations using a simple Gaussian
air dispersion model (6) were carried out
to provide some insight into the airborne
level of chemicals the dog might be
perceiving at different distances from a
source.  These calculations suggested that
with a source emitting at 0.5 ug/min in a 5
mph breeze the dog could be responding to
as little as 1-5 parts per trillion in the
air, depending on how far from the source
he gave the first alert.  Figure 1 is a
plot for such a model calculation.
Laboratory research by other investigators
has indicated that the dog was capable of
detecting chemical odors at the parts per
quadrillion level (7).
                XYLENE CONCENTRATION
                     DOWNWIND
                    CENTERLINE

                   GROUND LEVEL
                   .0.5 ug/min, 5 mph


                   .0.5 ug/min," 1 mph
 Figure 1.
i   2    3    4     5    T
 DOWNWIND DISTANCE (meters)

 Calculated plume concentrations
     for xylene.
      To work at even lower emission levels
and also to provide a constant emission
rate, as might be expected from a contam-
inated piece of heavy equipment or a tank
leak, permeation tubes, consisting of
                                    sealed lengths of plastic that allow vapors
                                    to permeate through the walls at uniform
                                    rates as long as liquid is present (Figure
                                    2).  These efforts did not deter the dogs.
                                    Ramos readily and happily found permeation
                                    tubes emitting at only 0.4 ug/min, the
                                    practical limit for calibration by weight
                                    loss  over a reasonable length of time.
                                    Even a commercial tube calibrated as
                                    emitting xylene at 10 ug/min at 90 C (the
                                    calculated emission rate at 25 C is only
                                    0.062 ug/min) was readily found by both
                                    dogs.  Of course, the tubes were never
                                    handled without gloves and were never
                                    touched by the dogs to avoid imparting
                                    other scents as clues.  From later work, it
                                    appears that the dog is probably still one
                                    or more orders of magnitude away from the
                                    CANINE DETECTION LIMIT!
    Figure 2.  Permeation tubes used in
                 training.

DECONTAMINATION

      To familiarize the dog with the type
of searches that could be encountered,
samples, either a drop on a surface or in a
dowel or film canister, or permeation
tubes, were hidden on, under, or in
"available" heavy equipment vehicles.  The
dog was then brought to the site and
encouraged to search, usually first
"scanning" the entire vehicle on his own
and then proceeding to a more detailed
search under the guidance of the handler.
With rare exception, the article was
located quickly.
                                          -219-

-------
      To simulate a real situation, permis-
sion was obtained to use a front end loader
at a construction site in Morris Plains,
New Oersey.  A mud consisting of 5 g of
alumina powder, water, and xylene was
applied to a spot on the vehicle and the
dog brought in to search.  Blanks consist-
ing only of alumina plus water were also
applied.  This sequence was repeated three
times, placing the xylene-tainted mud at
different points.  In the first test, the
dog localized the odor but did not actually
locate the sample, which was on the
underside of the beam supporting the
shovel.  In the second test, the dog found
the sample (in the opening of one of the
lower frame members) after considerable
searching and with some guidance.  In the
third test, the dog quickly found the
sample on a horizontal surface at the rear
of the left track. (Figure 3)
    Figure 3.  Ramos searching vehicle.

      Throughout the tests, it was observed
that the dog was very anxious to get under-
neath the vehicle.  This behavior plus a
strong diesel fuel odor led the investi-
gators to discover a very significant fuel
oil leak from a ruptured line.  Diesel fuel
had saturated the ground under the vehicle
and it was this odor that the dog was
concentrating on.  Since diesel fuel is
rich in xylene, the dog's success in
locating added sources becomes even more
amazing.  Even more intriguing was the •
dog's considerable interest in the front
bumper of one investigator's car during a
rest period.  A sample alumina/xylene mud
had been placed on the bumper the day
before as practice.
       To obtain a semi-quantitative idea
of the level of xylene that the dog was
detecting in these tests, air samples were
collected directly from each mud
immediately after the dog had completed his
search, as well as from the general area
(background).  The sample from test 2 was
lost when the dog pawed it.  These samples
were collected by holding an inverted 2.5"
funnel 0.5-1.0 inches over the mud and
drawing air into a Tenax adsorbent trap for
10 minutes at 3-4 cc/min (Figure 4).
  Figure 4.  Equipment used to collect air
         sample over alumina mud.

The traps were then returned to the labora-
tory, desorbed thermally, and analyzed by
gas chromatography (GC), giving the levels
of xylene noted in Table 1.

 TABLE 1.  DETECTED XYLENE CONCENTRATIONS
       Sample    Cone.  Emission Rate
                (ppb)   (ng/min)
background
sample. #1
sample. #2
sample. #3
car bumper
10
68*
LOST
24
517
0.3
1.0
-
0.77
16.0
     *sample funnel contaminated with
             mud, result high.
                                           -220-

-------
It must be concluded that the dog is able
to detect and locate a source of xylene
(simulated residual contamination in this
case) — even when a significant amount of
the same vapor is present in the background
air.

      In a second set of experiments at
another location, xylene-contaminated
alumina muds were applied to two of five
hand-shovels placed on snow-covered ground
and a blank water/alumina mud was applied
to a third one.  The dog found one xylene
sample (A) rapidly, but he showed little
interest in the second xylene sample (B)
until directed to search that shovel.  The
dog also did show considerable interest in
the blank shovel (C), but not at the mud
itself.  Instead, his interest seemed to be
concentrated on an area to which some of
the melting snow and mud may have run.  Air
samples were again taken and analyzed by
GC.  While the GC of the air trapped over
the blank shovel showed no xylene, there
was another, as yet unidentified, peak.

   TABLE 2.  XYLENE DETECTION ON SHOVELS
Sample
shovel A
shovel B
Blank C
background
Cone.
(ppb)
23
11
0
0
Emission Rate
(ng/min)
3.6
0.2
0
      On the basis of these experiments, it
appears that the dog can be a valuable
asset to EPA and cleanup contractors trying
to establish whether equipment can be
removed from a site.  Since the decision to
use the dog and the selection of the target
compound can be made while the cleanup is
proceeding, there would be more than
adequate time to train or condition the dog
to the compound(s) of interest.  And, as
noted earlier, the dog would be used only
to point out residual contamination,
whether on heavy equipment, hand tools, or
even personnel protective gear.  It remains
the responsibility of the cleanup crew to
clean the indicated area further or
"measure" the dog's find by wipe tests and
quantification.
CHEMICAL DISCRIMINATION

      One question kept surfacing as work
progressed.  How selective was the dog?
Would 129 dogs be needed to find the 129
priority pollutants (and more for each
chemical 'on the RCRA lists) or could one
dog find them all?  And, from the opposite
point of view, would a dog trained to find,
for example, xylene, give false positives
by also finding Parathion, trichloroethane,
acetic acid, diesel fuel, and anything else
in the area?  These were interesting
questions and the team set out to get some
insight into what would happen.

      Field-testing the question of
selectivity presented a unique problem.  It
was realized that while the goal was to
observe the dog's natural response
(retrieve, curious, ignore, etc.) to any
new chemical that had not previously been
used in training, this natural response
would soon be replaced by a trained or
learned response.  For example, rewarding
the dog for finding substances other than
the original target (trained) chemical
would be training him; discipline also
would be training him (aversion training)
not. to indicate those.  Even no reaction by
the handler to "an improper find" could
cause the dog to work harder to gain
approval — by seeking more of the same
odor!  Consequently, it was anticipated
that only limited testing could be done
before a learned response would be
produced.

      The initial experiments consisted of
choices between structurally-similar
chemicals, xylene and ethyl benzene, or
trichloroethane and trichloroethylene,
placed on undisturbed twigs several feet
apart.  Human odor thresholds for the
chlorinated hydrocarbons are higher (less
sensitive) than for the aromatics (Table
3).  With xylene and ethyl benzene

     TABLE 3. CHEMICAL ODOR THRESHOLDS
Chemical
trichloroethane
tr i ch 1 or oethy 1 ene
toluene
xylene
ethyl benzene
n-amyl alcohol
Threshold
(ppm)
20.0
20.0
2.0
0.5
2.0.
5.0
                                          -221-

-------
the first reaction to the ethyl benzene
appeared to be recognition that the odor
was "interesting (i.e., similar) but not
quite right".  However, in repeat tests the
dog then did retrieve articles tainted with
ethyl benzene, probably the learned
behavior expected from the noted uninten-
tional training.  In experiments with
chlorinated compounds, the dog initially
ignored the trichloroethylene, but began to
show awareness in subsequent experiments.
The tendency to retrieve trichloroethylene
articles never was as strong as that for
ethyl benzene.

      In a more complex experiment, undis-
turbed twigs 2-3 feet apart were impreg-
nated with 1 drop of water, amyl alcohol
(dissimilar odor), xylene, and ethyl
benzene.  When allowed to explore the area
freely, the dog noted but ignored the amyl
alcohol, showed considerable interest (and
uncertainty?) about the ethyl benzene, and
ultimately retrieved the xylene.

      Because of concern about "incidental
training", this question of selectivity was
not pursued further.  It was the research
team's opinion that the find of any contam-
ination close in character to that of the
target material would be useful and worth
investigation.  And, while it was unlikely
that a completely different chemical odor
would be present at a site, if it was,
monitoring personnel should be interested
in knowing of its presence.

      Thus, after several months of
developing and modifying field techniques
the program had produced a dog that could
be reliably used to locate small residues
of chemicals such as might persist on heavy
equipment even after decontamination.
Where wipe tests only have a random proba-
bility of "hitting" a contaminated spot,
the dog could assist the contractor by
quickly indicating where such residues were
— even when inaccessible or invisible to
human observation ~ and could quickly
evaluate the effectiveness of subsequent
cleaning attempts.  Of course, the results
of wipe or other tests at residues detected
by the dog could, at some point, be inter-
preted as "de minimus" because of level or
size of the area.
LEAKING UNDERGROUND TANKS

       The area of leaking underground
tanks was, as anticipated, a much more
challenging problem.  The goal was to use
the intelligence and olfactory acuity of
the dog to detect any vapors rising to the
surface from a leak, as reported with leaks
from buried natural gas lines and
electrical cable oils.  The concern was,
however, that the dog would also find any
other sources of the target compound,
including every surface spill, drips at
loading valves, etc.

      In seeking means to avoid this
problem, it was realized that while pure
chemicals stored in tanks would not change
when leaked, a complex mixture such as
gasoline might undergo significant extrac-
tion and/or fractionation as the vapors
from a leak permeated through the soil to
the surface.  Such changes could, it was
hypothesized, provide a vapor profile
sufficiently different from that of surface
spills so that the dog could differentiate
the two.  Attempts to simulate this
permeation phenomenon by analyzing gasoline
vapors passing up through soil columns were
not successful.  Very little vapor was pro-
duced and no significant differences in
profile were observed.

      In an alternate approach, regular
unleaded gasoline was extracted with
water.  Gas chromatographic analysis of the
washed gasoline did indicate a reduction in
the lower aromatics, benzene, toluene, and
xylene.  Efforts were then directed to
training the dog Ramos to detect this dif-
ference, primarily the ABSENCE of xylene,
with which he was familiar.  In spite of
several approaches and many attempts, how-
ever, a reliable, preferential response by
the dog to the washed gasoline was never
achieved.  To this time it has not been
possible to devise a training scheme or a
search protocol that would provide the
desired selective detection for vapors
leaking from an underground tank.

      It is unlikely that we will be able
to solve this problem within the
constraints of this project, and three
challenging questions remain.  First, the
dog used in the gasoline work had,
unfortunately, already been trained to
detect xylene.  Perhaps a dog without that
training would be more sensitive to the
different profiles of washed and unwashed
                                           -222-

-------
gasoline (the xylene is not totally removed
by extraction).  The second dog, now being
trained only for chlorinated hydrocarbons,
may offer the opportunity to test this
point.

      Second, to date the dog has been
asked to identify —- and differentiate —
the vapors emanating from small (1-2 drops)
liquid samples of washed and unwashed
gasoline.  However, gas chromatography
suggests that there may be significant and
rapid changes in the vapor profiles over
these samples that would not be comparable
to the "steady state" that would exist over
an underground tank leak.  Diffusion tubes,
vials equipped with small-bore vents,
should provide more uniform vapor profiles
for washed and unwashed gasoline that may
be more readily differentiated by the dog.
Unfortunately, preliminary gas chromato-
graphic analyses exhibit no differences in
the vapor profiles for the two samples.

      Third, the investigators' experience,
and conversations with other trainers, ,
animal psychologists, and veterinarians
have failed to uncover any prior evidence
that an animal can be trained to respond to
the ABSENCE of a stimulus.  If that is
true, a completely different training
approach may be needed.  One such approach
would be the introduction of small amounts
of marker chemicals.   While it is expected
that a dog would find a properly selected
marker at the right concentration, just as
dogs found the butyl  mercaptan marker in
natural gas, supplier resistance to
contamination of their products at any
concentration is anticipated.  In addition,
all surface leaks, spills and other sources
at a site would soon  become contaminated
and would, presumably, be indicated by the
dog.

CONCLUSIONS

1.  The dog/handler team is a viable tool
for EPA and their cleanup contractors to
use in evaluating the effectiveness of
decontamination efforts on equipment.
Presumably, the effectiveness of cleanup of
building surfaces as  well as land sites,
hand tools, and protective gear could also
be evaluated by the dog.

2.  The dog shows a degree of selectivity
for similar compounds that is useful but
not absolute.  Greater selectivity could,
presumably, be achieved by training, but it
is doubtful if that would have any
advantage.

3.  A viable technique for using the dog to
detect gasoline vapors from leaking
underground tanks only has not yet been
developed.
REFERENCES

1.  Arner, Lorenz D., Glen, R. Johnson,
    and Herbert S. Skovronek, Dec. 1985.
    Delineating Toxic Areas by Canine
    Olfaction, US Environmental Protection
    Agency Project Summary,
    EPA/600/S2-85/089.

2.  New Jersey Institute of Technology,
    Canine Olfaction:  Evaluation of Canine
    Olfaction Technology for Detection of
    Hazardous Substances.  USEPA
    Cooperative Agreement No. CR
    812180-01-3, 1985.

3.  Johnson, Glen R., Tracking Dog Theory
    and Methods, 1977, Arner Publications,
    Westmoreland, New York, pp 14-21.

4.  Johnson, Glen R., The New York
    Experiment, June 1981, Off-Lead, pp
    10-13.

5.  Johnson, Glen R.  Odorless Gas
    Detection by Domestic Canines, December
    1977, Off-Lead, pp 18,19.

6.  Turner, D. Bruce, Workbook of
    Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates, 1970,
    US. Dept. of Health, Education and
    Welfare Publication No. 999-AP26.

7.  Moulton, D. G. and D. A. Marshall, The
    Performance of Dogs in Detecting
    alpha-Ionone in the Vapor Phase,
    1976, Journal of Comparative
    Physiology, 110, pp 287-306.
                                           -223-

-------
         NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING (NOT) FOR LOCATION OF CONTAINERS BURIED IN SOIL

                        Arthur E.  Lord, Jr. and Robert M.  Koerner
                                    Drexel University
                                 Philadelphia, PA  19104


                                        ABSTRACT

     At the 12th Annual Hazardous Waste Research Symposium held at Cincinnati  in 1986 the
authors reported on their work concerning the nondestructive testing (NOT) for location of
containers buried in soil.  An overall view was presented at that time.  In this paper
more detail is given about certain aspects of the testing, which could not be included
previously due to space limitations.

     Experimental work is described where seven techniques were reduced to four for the
majority of the testing.  (Originally 17 techniques were considered - 10 were eliminated
during the literature search.)  The four techniques:

     .  metal detector (MD)
     .  electromagnetic induction (EMI)
     .  magnetometer (MAG)
     .  ground probing radar (GPR)

were looked at in considerable detail.  In particular, results concerning the ability of
each method to detect the container(s) when not travelling directly over the container(s)
(the lateral scan sensitivity) are given.  Also detailed results, in the form of response
contour diagrams, are given in the case of a "metal trash dump."

     The effect of steel container burial orientation on the GPR is presented.  Water
table depth determination (to 15 feet) with GPR is also demonstrated.  Under near perfect
conditions of very little interference (i.e., low electrical conductivity, highly homo-
geneous, dry soil and absence of power lines, metal objects etc.), it is possible to
detect empty plastic drums to a depth of.three feet with EMI.
INTRODUCTION

     An overview of the results of our
work concerning the location of buried con-
tainers using various nondestructive (re-
mote sensing) techniques were presented at
the 12th Annual Hazardous Waste Research
Symposium (Lord and Koerner, 1986a).  This
paper briefly reviews that work and pre-
sents additional detail concerning portions
of the work which could not be presented
earlier due to space limitations.

     The investigation of subsurface ob-
jects can be approached in two very dif-
ferent ways.  The first type is by use of
a suitable destructive test method.  This
category includes:   test pits, excavation
trenches, auger holes, core borings, and
observation wells.   While one does indeed
"see" the subsurface materials as they are
excavated for ease of examination of sub-
sequent testing, such methods have certain
drawbacks in identifying and locating
buried containers (Lord and Koerner, 1986a).

     The second type of approach to identi-
fy and locate buried containers is by the
use of a suitable non-destructive testing
(NOT) method;  These have also been called
remote sensing or short range geophysical
techniques.  Within this category are the
following methods which have either been
used or appear to have applicability:
                                          -224-

-------
seismic reflection, seismic refraction,
electrical resistivity, electromagnetic in-
duction, induced polarization, metal detec-
tor, magnetometer, continuous microwave,
pulsed radio frequency (ground penetrating
radar), infrared radiation, sonar (pulse
echo acoustic), electrical self potential,
optical (below water surfaces), and pene-
trating radiation.  All of the above
methods are not equally suited for identi-
fying and locating buried containers.
Seventeen techniques were identified; as a
result of the literature search ten were
eliminated from further consideration;
seven were evaluated further in the experi-
mental phase of the project and are de-
scribed in the following paragraphs.

DESCRIPTION OF METHODS

     The metal detector (MD) and electro-
magnetic induction (EMI) methods, are both
inductive methods.  A transmitting coil
sends a continuous electromagnetic signal
to a receiving coil.  As a simplified de-
scription, the signal arrives at the re-
ceiver essentially through two major paths.
One path is through the air and the induced
signal does not change with the search
position.  The other path is through the
subsurface material and is affected mainly
by the local electrical conductivity of
material involved.  If an anomaly in the
subsurface conductivity is encountered,
e.g., a buried metal drum, the induced
signal received through the earth path is
changed significantly and the instrument
indicates this change accordingly.  Refer
to Lord, et at. (1982a) and McNeil! (1982),
where the commercially-available instru-
ments used in these studies are described
i n detai1.

     The ground penetrating radar (GPR)
method operates on exactly the same princi-
ple as ordinary aircraft radar.  A short
pulse of electromagnetic radiation is
beamed in the ground by a special highly-
damped antenna and reflections occur from
any subsurface discontinuity in dielectric
constant.  The reflected pulse arrives
back at the receiving antenna and a dis-
play of reflected intensity versus depth
is presented on an oscilloscope and on a
recorder.  This commercially-available
technique is described more fully in
Bowders, et al. (1982).

     The,magnetometer (MAG) method mea-
sures the local magnetic field strength
 (essentially the earth's field) and, with
 it,'any changes in this magnetic field.
 The type used in this study was a proton
 precession model.  The local magnetic field
 is determined by measuring the precession
 frequency of the proton magnetic moment..
 This rate is linear in the magnetic field
 and, as the frequency can be measured very
 precisely, the magnetic field can also be
 measured very accurately.  (The source of
 precessing protons is an organic liquid;
 the liquid, generator and associated fre-
 quency measuring apparatus are contained
 •in the MAG unit).  A steel drum, being
 ferromagnetic, changes the local value from
 the earth's magnetic field and hence can
 be detected.  The MAG technique (commer-
 cially-available) is described in more de-
 tail in Tyagi, et al. (1983).

     The electrical resistivity (ER) method
 applies current to the ground through
 electrodes and depends, for its operation,
 on the fact that any subsurface variation
 in conductivity alters the form of the
 current flow within the earth.  Therefore,
 the distribution of electrical potential
 is affected.  The degree to which the po-
 tential measured at the surface is affected
 depends on the size, shape, location and
 electrical resistivity of the sub-surface
 mass.  It is therefore possible to obtain
 information about the sub-surface distri-
 bution of various bodies at the surface.
 This method is used extensively in the oil
 and mineral prospecting area, but has not
 been widely used in shallow monitoring for
 small buried objects.  It has seen some
 use for tracing sub-surface liquids.
 There are many sources of commercial equip-
ment to choose from.

     Seismic refraction (SR) is a well
 established geophysical  method.  In this
method a seismic impulse (a hammer blow or
 explosive charge) is applied to the ground
 and the time to reach a transducer is mea-
 sured for varying distances between the
 impulse and the transducer.  The time is
 plotted as a function of distance and, if
 there is a well-defined stratigraphic
 layer beneath the surface, a characteristic
 break in the curve is found from which the
depth to the layer can be determined.  This
method has not been used to detect small
objects but is widely used in oil  and
mineral prospecting and exploration, and
 can be used to determine generalized topo-
graphy at a dump site.  Details concerning
 ER and SR can be found in the.book by
                                          -225-

-------
Dobrin (1976).

     The continuous microwave (CWM) method
Is similar to ground probing radar except
that a continuous wave (CW) is used.  The
CW is swept in frequency and the wave re-
flected from the ground surface and the
wave from a subsurface reflection inter-
fere with each other.  The spacing (in fre-
quency) between the interference maxima
(or minima) as the frequency is swept gives
the depth of the reflecting surface.  Some
systems of this "type are in an advanced re-
search stage; however, they are not availa-
ble commercially as far as the authors are
aware.  Details concerning this method are
found in Koerner, et al.  (1978).

DESCRIPTION OF FIELD SITES

     The first site'was in a nearly ideal
dry sandy soil in an open field free of
man-made interference (Lord, et al. 1982b).
This site provided .an excellent starting
point for our experimental work.  Three
methods (ER, SR and CWM) were eliminated
from further consideration based on the
field data at this first site.  The second
site was much more formidable.  (Koerner,
et al., 1982)  Here a saturated silty clay
soil overlying shallow shale rock was used.
Recognizing that containers are sometimes
dumped directly into water (Weston, 1981)
and that the salinity of the water can
range from fresh to brine, the third study
was directed at drums under water (Lord,
et al., 1984).

     Important is the extent to which
ground water salinity influences the detec-
tion capability of these NOT methods.  To
this end, studies were made at a fourth
site with steel containers buried in a soil
of varying electrical conductivity.
(Koerner, et al., 1984)  The ocean was used.
as an electrical conductivity extreme and
the conductivity decreased substantially
as the survey moved inland.  Site 5 was
the same location as Site 4 but, in this
case, plastic containers were used instead
of steel.  (Lord and Koerner, -1986b)

RESULTS

Overall View

     Table 1 is an overall view of the
ability of all four NOT methods to detect
steel and plastic containers in a wide
variety of subsurface situations.  It
should be considered as a guide to the
practitioner when considering the use of
NOT methods for a particular soil.   (More
detail can be found in last year's Con-
ference Proceedings- Lord and Koerner,
1986a and the Final Report on the Project-
Lord and Koerner, 1987).

Elimination of Certain NOT Methods

     Figure 1 shows the results for  a
seismic refraction  (SR) survey over  the
four steel drum pattern indicated on the
figure.  The drums were placed horizontally
and with about four feet of soil cover at
Site 1.  There is essentially no indica-
tion of the drums in the survey.  This ex-
perimental result, taken together with
the fact that no work has been reported
using seismic refraction (SR) in.very short
range container searching eliminated the
technique from further consideration.

     Figure 2 shows the results of an elec-
trical resistivity  (ER) survey over  the
same four steel drum pattern.  Again there
is no indication of the buried drums, even
though the electrode spacing was choosen
to be quite sensitive to the scale of the
burial.  The-large increase at the right
end of the survey corresponds to a gulley
where water runs during rain storms.  Thus
for the same reason as with SR, this method
was eliminated from further consideration.

     Figure 3 shows the results of a con-
tinuous microwave (CWM) scan over the same
four steel drum pattern.  There seems to-be
an indication of the drums.  However the
calculated depths are too low by a factor
of 3-4.  Thus the method appears to  be of
quite limited value in searching for buried
drums.  As there were also no published
reports of its use in this type applica-
tion, the CWM method was eliminated  from
'future consideration.  A prime reason for
the elimination of the three methods de-
scribed above in this section is that there
appeared to be much more attractive  methods
available, namely, MD, EMI, MAG, and GPR.

Location of a. "Trash Dump"

     At Site 1 a pit approximately 12 ft x
12 ft x 5 ft deep was filled with six
steel drums, two plastic drums of various
sizes and a few steel plates of various
sizes.  This site was called the "Trash
Dump".  Figure 4 shows the disposition of
the buried objects..  The responses of the
                                           -226-

-------
 four NOT methods  over  the  "Trash  Dump"  are
 shown in Figures  5-8.

      Figure  5  gives  the MD results  in terms
 of the strong  response region.  MD  certain-
 ly detects the "Trash  Dump" quite well.

      Figure  6  gives  the EMI results  in
 terms of equal  response amplitude contour
 lines.   Note the  position  of the  "posts"
 outlining the  burial.  Again,  EMI locates
 the "Trash Dump"  very  well.

      The MAG response  is shown in Figure 7
 again in terms  of response contour  lines.
 The center of  the contour  appears somewhat
 east (about  4-6 feet)  of the center'of  the
 steel  drum distribution.   This characteris-
 tic of the MAG  response is quite typical,
 but would not  seem to  be a serious draw-
 back in the  use of the method, for the
 "Trash  Dump" is still  located quite well.

      Figure  8  shows  the GPR response over
 the "Trash Dump".  Here the side walls of
 the excavations are  clearly seen, however
 the individual  objects in  the "dump" can-
 not be  delineated.   This is an extremely
 important use of  the GPR method, i.e., to
 locate  the side walls of a burial site.

 Lateral  Scan Sensitivity and Drum Orienta-
 tion  Effects

      It  is important to know how close the
 scan  line must  be to the actual buried con-
 tainer  before detection if possible.
 Figure  9 shows  the results of EMI scans  at
 various  distances laterally displaced from
 the  line centered on the four 55-gallon
 steel drum sequence.  The drums were buried
 at  Site  1 with  about four feet of soil
 cover.   It is seen that the method is quite
 sensitive until the offset is greater than
 8 feet for the  antenna perpendicular to
 the center line and greater than 4 feet  "
offset for the antenna parallel to the cen-
 ter line of the drums.

     Figure 10  indicates  the lateral scan
sensitivity of the MAG method for a single
 30-gallon steel drum buried at Site 1, with
about three feet of soil  cover, and at dif-
 ferent orientations.  The MAG method is
sensitive to about 8 feet of lateral off-
set for single drums.

     Figure 11 shows that the GPR method
 loses location ability if the scan is dis-
placed by two feet from the center of
 drum.   The MD is a less sensitive version
 of EMI and hence has, as was shown in our
 experiments, very little lateral  scan
 sensitivity.

      Of interest also is the effect of
 steel  drum orientation on the response of
 the various methods.   The MAG results are
 shown  in Figure 10.   EMI results  are shown
 in Figure 12.  -Figure 13 shows the effect
 of drum orientation  on the GPR response.
 The MD does not have  the requisite sensi-
 tivity to be very sensitive to drum orien-
 tation.

      In summary EMI  and MAG are moderately
 dependent on the orientation of the drum
 whereas GPR is  extremely sensitive to
 orientation with the  horizontal burial
 giving, by far the best response.      •  .

 Water  Table Determination

      Figure 14  shows  the detection of the.
 water  table at  Site 4.   The varying depth
 water  table here was  of quite high elec-
 trical  conductivity,  so contrast was quite
 high and the table could be seen very
 easily to sixteen feet.   The soil  was  a"
 sand of very little stratigraphy,  so the
 GPR method worked very well.   This is, one
 of the deepest water  tables that has been
 reported using  GPR, to  the  authors'  knowl-
 edge.

 Detection of Plastic  Drum with  EMI

     Figure 15 shows  the  results of EMI
 scans  over 40 gallon  empty  plastic drums
 at Site 1.  The drum at one and three  feet
 of cover are easily detected, even with
 many feet of lateral  off-set'of the  instru-
 ment.   In essence the  EMI is  acting  like
 an air-void detector  here.   The excellent
 resolving power  here  is  undoubtedly  due
 to the  fact that  the  sand is  very dry, very
 uniform  and of quite  low  electrical  con-
 ductivity;

 SUMMARY

     The  basic results of our work have
 been presented In detail elsewhere  (Lord
 and Koerner 1986, 1987)... The summary is
 given in  Table 1.  Here is presented a
 "pot pourri" of interesting and important
results which due to space  limitation
 could not  be fitted into the paper at last
year's conference.  (Lord and Koerner,
 1986).  •
                                          -227-

-------
     In particular, detail is given as to
experimental results which allowed us to
eliminate certain NOT methods from future
considerations.  Considerable detail is
given as to the ability of the various NOT
methods to "pick up" an artificial "Trash
Dump".  The methods used were metal detec-
tion (MO), electromagnetic induction (EMI),
magnetometer (MAG) and ground penetrating
radar (GPR).  The ability of GPR to pick
up trench boundaries cannot be over em-
phasized.

     Results concerning the sensitivity of
the NOT methods when passing on a scan not
directly over the center line of the drums
are presented.  The GPR response suffers
greatly when "off-center".  The effect of
drum orientation is catastrophic only for
GPR; only the horizontal burials are easily
picked up.  Water table determination with
GPR to 16 feet is demonstrated as well as
plastic drum detection with EMI.  The
latter case is an example of void detction.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     We thank the U. S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency for funding of this work
through Cooperative Agreement No. CR
807777020.  Special thanks are due to Dr.
John E. Brugger, the project officer on
this Cooperative Agreement, for his con-
stant interest, advice and encouragement.
We also wish to thank Ira Wilder, Frank
Freestone and Jack Farlow of EPA for their
support.  A large number of fine Drexel
University graduate students deserve credit
for their cooperation and enthusiasm in
this work.

REFERENCES

Bowders, J. 0., Jr., Koerner, R. M. and
Lord, A. E., Jr. (1982).  "Buried Container
Detection Using Ground Penetrating Radar,"
Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 7,
pp. 1-17.

Dobrin, M. B., (1976).  Introduction to
Geophysical Prospecting, McGra'w Hill, New
York.

Koerner, R. M., Lord, A. E., Jr.,
Okrasinski, T. A.'and Reif, J. S., (1978).
"Detection of Seepage and Subsurface Flow
of Liquids by Microwave Interference
Methods," Proc. Conf. on Control of Hazard-
our Materials, April 11-18, 1978, Miami
Beach, Florida, pp. 287-292.
Koerner, R. M., et al., U982).  "Use of
NOT Methods to Detect Buried Containers in
Saturated Clayey. Silt Soil," Proceedings
of Management of Uncontrolled Waste Sites,
Nov. 29 - Dec. I , 1982, Washington, DC,
HMCRI, pp. 12-16.

Koerner, R. M. and Lord, A. E., Jr. (1984).
"NOT Location of Containers Buried in
Saline Contaminated Soils," Proceedings of
Management of Uncontrolled Waste Sites,
Nov. 7-9, 1984, Washington, DC, HMCRI Pub!.,
Silver Spring, MD, 20910.

Lord, A. E., Jr., Koerner,  R. M. and
Freestone, F. J. (1982a),  "The Identifica-
tion and Location of Buried Containers Via
Non-Destructive Testing Methods," Journal
of Hazardous Materials. Vol. 5, pp. 221-
233.

Lord, A. E., Jr.^ et al. (1982b).  "Use of
NOT Methods to Detect and Locate Buried
Containers Verified by Ground Truth Mea-
surement," Proceedings Hazardous Materials
Spill Conference, April 19-22, Milwaukee,
WI, HMCRI, pp. 12-16.

Lord, A. E., Jr., Koerner, R. M. and
Arland, F. J. (1984).  "The Detection of
Containers Located Beneath Water Surfaces
Using NOT  (Remote) Sensing Techniques,"
Proceedings of Hazardous Waste and Environ-
mental Emergencies, March 12-14, 1984,
Houston, HMCRI, pp. 392-395.

Lord, A.  E., Jr. and Koerner,  R. M.  (1986a).
"Nondestructive Testing (NOT)  for  the  Lo-
cation of  Containers Buried in So.il,"
Land Disposal,  Remedial Action,  Incinera-
tion and Treatment of Hazardous  Waste,
Proceedings  of the Twelfth Annual  Research
Symposium  at Cincinnati, Ohio, April 21-
23,  1986.  U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency.

Lord, A.  E., Jr. and Koerner,  R. M.  (1986b).
"Nondestructive Testing (NOT)  for  the  Lo-
cation of  Plastic  Containers  Buried  in
Soil,"  Proc.  1986  Hazardous Material Spills
Conference,  St.  Louis, May 5-8,  1986,
Govt.  Inst.  Inc.

Lord, A.  E., Jr. and Koerner,  R. M.  (1987).
"Nondestructive Testing (NOT)  Techniques
to  Detect  Contained  Hazardous  Waste,"  Final
Report on  Cooperative Agreement  No.
CR807777  Hazardous Waste  Engineering Re-
search  Laboratory, Releases  Control  Branch,
U.  S. Environmental  Protection Agency,
                                           -228-

-------
Edison, New Jersey,  February 1987.

McNeil], J. .0.  (1982).   "Electromagnetic
Resistivity Mapping  of  Contaminant  Plumes,"
Proceedings of  Management  of Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites,  Nov.  29-Dec.  1,.
1982, Wash., DC,  Hazardous Materials Con-
trol Research Institute, Silver Spring,
MD, pp. 1-6.

Tyagi, S., Lord,  A.  E., Jr.  and Koerner,
R. M. (1983).   "Use  of  Proton Precession
Magnetometer to Detect  Buried Drums  in
Sandy Soil," Journal of Hazardous Materials,
Vol. 8, pp. 11-23.

Weston Consultants (1981).   "Ground  Pene-
trating Radar Survey Elizabeth River, New
Jersey," Final  Report to U.  S.  Coast
Guard, New York-,  30  June 1981,  14 pgs.
   so
 a
 £!
   10


   0
 FIG. 1
            10     20     30

             SPACING (FEET)
           10
                   2O
                          3O
                                        50
              SPACING (FEET)
Seismic refraction survey re-
sponse; (a) no drums present,
(b) four drum pattern present.
                                               ;WENNER ARRAY
                                                 POSITION OF c& ELECTRODE: (FEED
                                                 FIG. 2   Electrical  resistivity survey re-
                                                         sponse  over the four drum
                                                         pattern.
                                         16


                                         14


                                         12


                                         10


                                         8


                                         6


                                         4


                                         2


                                         0
                                                FIG. 3
                                                 8   12   16  2O  24  28  32  35
                                                 POSITION OF ANTENNAE (FEET)
Continuous wave microwave results
for the four drum pattern.
                                          -229-

-------
       REFERENCE POSTS
FIG. 4  Distribution of objects  in
        "trash dump".  Key:  metal  drums:
        1: horizontal, 30 gal; 2 horizon-
        tal, 55 gal; 3: horizontal, 5
        gal; 4: vertical, 5  gal; 5: verti-
        cal, 30 gal; 6: 45°  angle,  5 gal;
        plastic drum: 7: horizontal, 30
        gal.
 FIG. 6  Electrical conductivity contours
         in the vicinity of the "trash
         dump" determined by the EMI
         technique.
           METAL DETECTOR
        STRONG RESPONSE REGION
    'TRASH DUMP' OUTLINE
  FIG. 5  MD response  in  the  vicinity of
          the "trash dump".
FIG. 7  Magnetic field contour map  of the
        "trash dump" using the MAG.   The
        actual magnetic field is 55 x 103
        Y plus the contour magnetic field
        label units of Y.  The "trash
        dump" boundary is indicated by the
        dashed lines.
                                           -230-

-------
                               -
                              -
                              -10*-
                                     k.
                                     U.

                                     3:
                                     K.
                                     a
                                     Q
                                                 FIG.  9
                            30     40

                            DISTANCE (It)
                     9  (b)
         Results of EMI scans over the
         four 55-gallon steel pattern with
         various lateral offset (a)
         antenna \_ to scan direction; (b)
         antenna II to scan direction.
FIG.  8  GPR survey over the  "trash dump"
         showing the excavation  boundaries
         of the burial pit.  •'( Arrows in-
         dicate trench boundaries).
^ O.40—
to
g O.30—
5
Ul O.20—
CC
O.IO—
•

4 — • 	 *- 2' OFFSET 1 ft
1 fl

T j
	 \ 	 6'OFFSET \
\
	 	 ' 	 8'OFFSET . V

• 4
1 | 1 1
                                  i
                           30     10
                           DISTANCE (ft)
                  9(0)
  S 300
  in
 •in
  I
  i
  1 200
                                                  LJ
                                                  cc
                                                    100
                                                                  20          40

                                                                   DISTANCE (FT)
                                        60
FIG. 10  MAGi scans over single  steel  drums
        (With about three feet  of  soil
         cover)of differing  orientations
         as shown on  Figure.  Scans  at
         various lateral offsets.
                                           -231-

-------

                                                                             T
                                                                 20     30     40
                                                                   DISTANCE (ft)

                                                                 12 (b)


                                                •FIG. 12  EMI scans for 55-gallon steel
                                                         drums buried with about three
                                                         feet of soil cover.  Drums of
                                                         various orientations as shown on
                                                         Figure.  Scans  at various
                                                         lateral offsets.
FIG. 11  GPR printouts for a single 55-
         gallon steel drum buried  hori-
         zontally with three feet  of  soil
         cover,  (a) Antenna directly
         over the drum (b) Antenna dis-
         placed two feet from drum center-
         line.
  aso-

•| 040—

Iai°:
§ 0 30-

* 0,10—
                 10
                        DISTANCE (ft)
                                         30
                    12  (a)
 GROUND SURFACE


  O1
      -...  _....,.__.,lft8ifas^WlEUH
FIG. 13  GPR printout showing survey of
         30-gallon steel drums at
         various orientations buried 3
         ft. beneath the surface,   (a)
         Drum standing on end; (b)  Drum
         at 45° angle to ground surface;
         (c) Drum buried horizontal to
         ground surface.
                                           -232-

-------
     Figure 14-    GPR scans showing the water table, starting at a depth of about 4 feet in
                   the left and going to a depth of about 16 feet at the right (Site 4).        ;
  J   h     K  "    h
 o-ll       I
K0.60—
0
. | 0.50—
i 0.40—
H 0.30 — i
§ -
£o.20-
_
0.10—

O- — •^\^./-^^^ysST^^st:


-• — •— »• 2' OFFSET


	 V 	 S'OFFSET
" ' 	 "8'OFFSET
1 T ' i i T i i ' i* ' M i
      10  20  30  10  50  60  70  80  90  IOO
                   DISTANCE (ft)
FIG. 15  Results for EMI over  empty 40-
         gallon plastic drums  buried
         with the  indicated  soil
         covers.   (Site 1).
                                         -233-

-------





CJ C
i- CU
S- l/l
3 CU
CO J_
o.
T3
CO C
NT-
00 "§
t— >
CO CO
O't-
CU4->
4-> O.
CO CU
(JO
5 c
~J *—
o
O'>-
•P4J
CO
W S"
•04J
O CO
r- c
4-> CO
CO O_
§1 £
C/) CO '1-
•»— c
S--O C
CO CO O
^"co t—
ovr- <|

ui  co
=3 C
1. & ^_^
O 4-* CO
•r- CU
>>"CJ CO
4-> C CJ
•r- Q -C
r-0 4->
T- C
.Q S- CU
CO CU S-
JJ-O CO
0.1= 0-
CU 3- 	
U
owe
< S- -r-
CJ
r- e co
cO-r- CO
S. CO i-
CU 4-> T3
C C 3
CJ O +->
C3 O CO
1

«-«
r—
CO








CO
JO
(U — .

o =c
"cu —
C7>
CO




CJ)
~
^
ct
o rctS
C T3 0-
> co cr
3
3
O
.
>



O
J
j c:
c o
cn-i— •—
CO 4-5 i — i
= o s;
3 3 LL
J C
[}
Jj




S-

3 Si
^- CU






q_
CU'i- ?
^-O n




C
o
•1—
4->
CO
3
CO
co

co ^~
Ot—
CO CO
4- •!—
S- S-
3 CO
CO 4->

CO Q.
S^_
0^0



CU CO CO
'cu'cu co
o o o
XXX
CO CU CO





•^^
0^
dis
c c -
CU CO CM
CU CO S-
o o o
X X O
co cu a.





•^"^
0^_^


excellent
average. (
not go'od


*— *»^-^
U3 CM
> — x^_-«

C CT3
cu cu o
i — i — O
i — i — en
CO CU
0 0 4->
X X 0
CO CO C


CO
"cO
-o
, CO
S
.e s- c
c/1 CO CO
CU 40 CO
S- C O
<4- •!- O



O O 0
CM in o

1 1 1
o o o
•—i LO




S-
CO
"3T3
c c .
CO CO
S- V>

c
<

i
s-
o
o
Q.






c~~
S.
*
CO
JJ
CO
S-
O)
TD






_
2..

moderate*


**™s
^t-
*— " *
A;
cu
CO
S-
co
T3
FT






^=
00
CO
S-



6?
CJ
C3
1— 1
'
o
in




CO
CU CO

S-H.
co ro co


LJ Tl i> i|_>
EEC
CO CO CO
'co'cu co
o o o
XXX
CO CU CO






^
• —
E 13 -O
CO O O
i— O O
i — CJ) en
CO
O 4-> +J
X 0 0
CO C C






_
CO

E -O -O
CO O O
i— O O
i — CJ) CJ)
CO
O 4-> 4-»
X O O
CO C E


**"^s
co ,
' '

cu o
i — O
i — en
CO S-
O O 4J
X O O
CU O. E


cu
CO
•o
CO
E
U) CO CO
CO 4-> CO
s_ c: o
M-T- 0





o o o
000
t-H t~ H i~H





S-
cu
4J
CO

























itainers
&-
8

-J
•r
t/
(C
SI






























-a -a
0 2
O C5
o o
c c



1
I *^"^* C
8"
• a-* 5
c/l O •
jj 4-d CU <4— C Cn
CO CO •!— *~ U) -r-
^ "E t> ' E o
CO O 3 S- CO 3 S-
0 o -a .r- +J "a o
x 45 a









•§ o
0 0
en en






•o "2
0 . 0
0 0
en en

? g
E ^


cu
CO
•o
CO
t C
<1) «3
4-> CD



o o
rH

I 1
S 1




CO
"3
E
CO
CD























> E
co en

" E
•a •!—
s-
 CO

CU E
f__ ip—
"cu >>
o E
X CO

*
-234-

-------
                      THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF POST-FLAME REACTIONS
                               APPLIED TO WASTE COMBUSTION

                                 Daniel  P.Y. Chang,  Ph.D.
                     Visiting Research Engineer to EPA/HWERL from the
                             Department  of Civil  Engineering
                                 University of California
                                 Davis,  California  95616

                                           and

                        Robert E.  Mournighan and  George L. Huffman
                             Thermal  Processes Research Staff
                                Thermal  Destruction  Branch
                            Alternative  Technologies Division
                     Hazardous Waste  Engineering  Research  Laboratory
                           U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
                                  Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268
                                        ABSTRACT

      The  equilibrium compositions  of  product  gases  resulting  from the combustion  of a few
 model  waste/fuel  mixtures  have  been calculated.   These  include  some  chlorinated hydrocar-
 bons  (CHCs)  and  some high  nitrogen-containing species.  The calculations were carried out
 with  the  aid of  an  interactive,  PC-compatible version of  a powerful  equilibrium solver,
 STANJAN.   Examples  are  drawn  from  the more  interesting  results  in order to demonstrate
 how the theoretical  calculations can  be interpreted  and used  to provide insight into the
 occurrence of products  of  incomplete  combustion  (PICs)  in incinerator effluents.  Practi-
 cal applications  and extensions  of the method are also  discussed.
 INTRODUCTION

     It has long been recognized that
 reaction kinetics, heat and mass trans-
 fer are limiting processes to the
 attainment of chemical equilibrium in
 combustion processes.  Nevertheless,
 because of the high temperatures and
 long residence times commonly found in
 hazardous waste incinerators, there may
 be situations in which the state of
 chemical equilibrium is approached, at
 least on a local basis. In such cases,
 thermodynamic equilibrium analyses can
 provide a useful semi-quantitative
 description of the final system compo-
 sition.  Even when kinetic limitations
 prevent the attainment of equilibrium,
the equilibrium composition of a system
is indicative of the state toward which
a reacting system is tending.  Perhaps
most importantly, thermodynamic equi-
librium computations provide an over-
view of system behavior which is not
readily apparent in detailed chemical
kinetic computations.

    •There are reasons to believe that
the penetration of principal organic
hazardous constituents (POHCs) and
products of incomplete combustion
(PICs) through incinerators has often
been associated with some type of non-
stoichiometric, fuel-rich condition
having occurred within the combustion
device.  Although the precise reasons
leading to a locally fuel-rich stoichio-
metry have not been fully determined,
the occurrence of non-stoichiometric
"pockets", "plugs" or "puffs", even
with an average condition of excess
air, has been suggested (1,2,9,10). For
                                         -235-

-------
this exploratory study of the post-
flame combustion environment (500 K <
T < 1500 K), it was assumed that con-
ditions ranged from stoichiometric
to fuel-rich.  Chemical species
examined were primarily hydrocarbons
(HC), chlorinated hydrocarbons (CMC),
and nitrogen species for which thermo-
dynamic data were readily available.
Because of space limitations, only
highlights of the investigation are
presented in this paper.  A preliminary
paper containing initial results for
CHCs should soon be available (2) and a
more complete presentation of results
will be available in a future EPA
report (3).

METHODS

     A powerful, "menu-driven", personal
computer  (PC) implementation of a code
for solving chemical equilibrium prob-
lems, STANJAN V3.6, was  employed in
this research (5).  The  standard PC
version of STANJAN  permits the inclu-
sion of up to 20 compounds in an equi-
librium computation.   By judicious
selection, many more than  20 species
can be studied under the same specifi-
cation of temperature  and  pressure  by
repeatedly  solving  the equilibrium
problem with new "minor" species.   The
errors incurred in  doing so  can  be
expected  to  be smaller than  the  accuracy
embodied  in the thermodynamic  data.
The  "major" species present  at  equi-
librium were determined by conducting
trial  computations, including  all
available compounds,  and systematically
retaining only those  that  appeared  at
high concentrations.   It quickly became
evident which  species  needed to  be
 retained  for the final computations as
whole  classes of compounds could be
 ignored  for the  cases  studied,  e.g.,
alkanes.

     Thermochemical data on  entropy and
 enthalpy  functions were prepared in a
 form suitable  for use with STANJAN.
 The chemical  species  used  in the calcu-
 lations  are shown  in  Table 1 along with
 the source of  the  data.  The data were
 used without further critical  evalua-
 tion.   In some cases  the thermodynamic
 functions were only available to 1000 K
 and a  smoothing algorithm in the STANJAN
 package was used to extend the data to
 6000 K as required by STANJAN.  Since
only the lower temperature range (T <
1500 K) was of interest, extrapolation
errors probably do not nave a signifi-
cant effect upon the predicted equi-
librium concentrations, as many com-
pounds occur at negligible concentra-
tions in the temperature range above
1000 K.

     For all the cases examined, equiva-
lence ratio (E.R. = [fuel/air] actual/
[fuel/air] stoichiometric) was ,
varied from 1.0  (stoichiometric) to
2.0  (highly fuel-rich).  For the CMC
computations, hydrogen-to-chlorine
ratio was also varied from 1:3 to 3:1.
Although the lower H:C1  ratio would be
unrealistic in an "average" sense, it
is conceivable that incomplete blending
of the waste/fuel mixture could lead to
introduction of  short-term fluctuations
in composition that could approach or
even  be less than 1:3, e.g., tetrachloro-
ethene  (specific gravity = 1.6) that
may  have stratified in a tank. Further-
more,  in some  cases the  fuel and the
waste  are  introduced  into the combus-
 tion unit  as  separate streams,  again
 resulting  in  the possibility of low
 H:C1, on  a local basis,  caused  by
 inadequate mixing.  As will  become
 evident from  the computational  results,
 it would  not  require  large amounts of
 an inadequately blended feedstock  or
 poorly mixed  gases  to result in  emission
 levels comparable to  those seen in
 field tests.

      The  predicted  equilibrium con-
 centrations are only  meaningful  in the
 sense that the "correct" chemical
 species have  been included in the
 computation.  Thus,  if a major specie
 which would form at equilibrium, such
 as CO, were to be left out of a compu-
 tation, the results would be in serious
 error.  Lack  of thermodynamic data
 prevented a full study of all  chlorin-
 ated ethenes  and benzenes.  Thus some
 species that  have been observed in
 source tests and which may have measur-
 able concentrations,  e.g., a mole
 fraction greater than about 1 E-10 (0.1
 ppb), have been ignored.  The figures
 presented in the results show concen-
 trations only of those species of
 particular interest.

      Some compounds were predicted to
 reach significant concentrations, but
                                          -236-

-------
 only at the lower extreme of the
 temperature range (T < 750 K), e.g.,
 graphitic carbon, C(s).  Under such
 conditions, kinetic limitations exist
 which prevent that condition from
 becoming an accessible thermodynamic
 state. In such cases,  the computations
 were repeated, removing the "offending
 species" to determine  the "next"
 thermodynamically favored compound.
 The validity of such manipulations
 is  questionable, nevertheless, insight
 regarding alternative  reactions of
 possible importance can be obtained
 using such a procedure, e.g.,  benzene,
 chlorinated benzenes and dioxins became
 significant species in some cases when
 formation of C(s) was  eliminated.

      It is well  known  that molecular
 nitrogen, N£,  present  in the combustion
 air is not particularly reactive.
 Therefore, only  the nitrogen that was
 assumed to be  present  in the waste
 molecules was  allowed  to be "reactive".
 A pseudo-species  having the thermal
 properties of  molecular nitrogen was
 included in the  equilibrium calcula-
 tions  to achieve  the composition  of
 reaction products that  would correspond
 to  combustion  with  air.  The system
 compositions were varied  in accordance
 with the type  of  waste  assumed,  e.g.,
 hydrogen cyanide,  acetonitrile  or
 acrylonitrile.  Equivalence ratios  were
 varied  as  described  above.   No  attempt
 was made to undertake a  systematic
 survey  of  nitrogen-chlorine inter-
 actions,  e.g., nitrosyl  chloride
 formation.

 SELECTED RESULTS  AND DISCUSSION

     The most striking  results  of the
 equilibrium  calculations occurred for
 simultaneous conditions  of  fuel-rich
 stoichiometry, E.R.  >  1.0, and  an H:C1
 ratio £ 1.0.  An  example of the results
 is shown  in Figures la, Ib  and  Ic for a
 system composition 1C:1H:3C1 (H:C1 =
 0.33) and  equivalence ratios of 1.0
 (stoichiometric), 1.01   (1% oxygen
deficiency), 1.05  (5% oxygen deficien-
 cy).  Note that at lower temperatures,
under even the slightest fuel-rich
conditions, CC14 and COC12 became
major thermodynamically stable species.
The temperature region  over which their
concentration increased rapidly began
at about 1000 K (about  700°C).   This is
 probably a sufficiently high temperature
 for the system to tend toward the
 equilibrium state given typical  post-
 flame residence times of about two
 seconds, and the relatively low bond
 strength of Clg molecules (239 kJ/mole).
 However, detailed kinetic calculations
 or experiments would be needed to con-
 firm these predictions.  Certainly for
 temperatures below 500 K, reactions
 would have slowed dramatically and the
 predicted equilibrium states would not
 be attained.

      Several  additional observations
 were noteworthy in the CMC calculations.

      1.  There was a competition among
 Cl  and 0 ("oxidizing" species) for the
 C and H (more-or-less chemically
 "reducing" species in the systems
 examined).  Formation of C02,  ^0 and
 HC1  was essentially quantitative under
 stoichiometric or fuel-lean conditions.

      2.  Under fuel-rich conditions, as
 the H:C1  ratio decreased, increasingly
 chlorinated methanes were observed as
 stable products in the  lower tempera-
 ture  range  < 1000  K,  i.e.,  chloromethane
 —> tetrachloromethane.

     3.   Under slightly  fuel-rich
 conditions  (1.0 <  E.R.  <  1.05),  solid
 carbon, benzene, chlorinated benzenes
 and chlorinated  dioxins were each
 predicted to form at  1ow temperatures.
 Solid  carbon and benzene were thermo-
 dynamically favored products with
 an excess of hydrogen present, while
 solid  carbon,  chlorinated dioxins and
 chlorinated benzenes  were favored
 products  for an  H:C1  ratio of 1.0.  ,
 When the  H:C1  ratio was less than
 1.0, none of the above  species were
 predicted to form because the Cl would
 directly oxidize the  C atoms to produce
 primarily chlorinated methanes
 (especially CC14).

     4.   Recognizing that kinetic limi-
tations would  prevent the attainment of
the equilibrium predictions described
 in (3)  above, the occurrence of solid
carbon, benzene, chlorinated benzenes
and chlorinated dioxins was successive-
 ly eliminated.   For H:C1 > 1.0, when
 solid carbon was disallowed, the ten-
dency was to form benzene, then ethyl-
ene and chloromethane (Figures 2a,2b,
                                         -237-

-------
2c).  For H:C1 = 1.0, and a fuel-rich
stoichiometry, E.R. = 2.0 the corres-
ponding tendency was to form solid
carbon, chlorinated dioxins, chlorinated
benzenes, benzene, chlorinated methanes
(Figures 3a,3b,3c,3d, 3e,3f).

     One inference that can be drawn
from the tendencies described above is
that it is quite likely that trace
amounts of the above species could be
formed in the cooling combustion gases
if the composition of the system corres-
ponded to those assumed.  One can also
speculate that chemically simpler
species, e.g., chlorinated  methanes and
ethenes, would be  more likely to be
formed at detectable concentrations
than those which  require a  longer
sequence of  elementary reaction steps,
i.e.,  chlorinated  methanes  >  benzene,
ethylene, or chlorinated ethenes  and
benzenes > chlorinated dioxins.
For the most part, it  is the  authors'
belief that  this  is  consonant with
observed test results  obtained from
incinerators that most closely corres-
pond to  the  equilibrium  assumptions,
e.g.,  mineral kilns  and  circulating  bed
combustors.   In  these  types of devices,
strong transverse turbulent mixing may
actually impede longitudinal  mixing,
 leading to  a condition approximating
 "plug-flow".  As a practical  application
 of these insights, it  can  be suggested
that it would be prudent to insure
 adequate blending of waste streams  with
 an excess of hydrogen (in the fuel)  and
 adequate mixing of the combustion
 gases  in a temporal  sense, i.e.,  the
 mixing process should produce both good
 microscale mixing and avoidance of
 non-stoichiometric "puffs" or plugs".
 Otherwise, high temperature alone will
 not guarantee low emission levels
 because some CHCs can simply re-
 form upon cooling.

      The initial  exploration of the
 nitrogen compounds under fuel-rich
 conditions  has not led to  any remark-
 able  insights, other than  that molecular
 nitrogen in  the  combustion air should
 not be included  as a  reactant in the
 system.  If a diluent gas  having the
 properties  of N£ was not substituted
 for the N£  in the combustion air, then
 unrealistically  large amounts of HCN
 (hydrogen cyanide), C^HsN  (acetonitrile)
 and CsHsN  (acrylonitrile)  were predicted
to be present as stable combustion
products.  Otherwise, the principal
nitrogen-containing species observed
was ammonia with only trace levels of
HCN, C2H3N, and C3H3N.  Some typical
results for the "pseudo-nitrogen" compu-
tations are shown in Figures 4a, 4b and
4c.

CONCLUSIONS

     This exploratory study has shown
that some valuable insights regarding
combustion processes can be obtained
from thermodynamic equilibrium analyses.
A wealth of thermodynamic data exists
for use with a very convenient compu-
tational tool, STANJAN.  Besides the
CHCs and nitrogen compounds, data are
available for fluorine, sulfur and
metals.  A systematic study of trace
species of environmental concern may
prove to be valuable, not only for
hazardous waste  incineration but for
other types of thermal  processes as
well.

     A  summary of  specific findings  is
given  below:

      1.  CHCs  are  thermodynamically
stable  compounds under  fuel -rich  con-
ditions ,
             ____-
 dition to be particularly  avoided.
 Trace levels of such  species  can  per-
 sist in the combustion  effluent even if
 only a small fraction of the  waste
 encounters the conditions  described
 above.  Such conditions can  arise from
 inadequate blending  of  fuel /waste
 mixtures and incomplete mixing with
 combustion air before leaving the high
 temperature zone of  an  incinerator.

       2.   In real systems CO would  be
 expected under the fuel -rich  conditions.
 There are reasons why CO  levels might
 increase without a concommitant in-
 crease in CHC  emissions.   However,  it
 appears unlikely that high levels of
 CHC emissions  are possible without  at
 least a moderate increase in CO  levels.

      3.  Thermodynamic  analyses may be
 useful in identifying species for which
 sampling methods need to be  developed.
 As an example, CUClg (phosgene)  is
 predicted to be present at trace  levels
 when  compounds such  as  CC14  (carbon
 tetrachloride) are present in the
                                          -238-

-------
 combustion effluent.   Because COC12
 is a gas at ambient temperatures  and
 readily hydrolyzed, its presence  may
 have gone undetected  using current
 sampling methods.

     4.   The initial screening of
 nitrogen-containing wastes did not
 identify any major potential  problems
 with residual  emissions under fuel-rich
 conditions, under  the assumption  that
 N2 in air was  not  available for reaction.

      5.   Additional kinetic studies
 are needed to  determine the range of
 applicability  of the  thermod.ynamic
 predictions. At present,  it can only be
 said that the  predictions  are  in
 qualitative agreement with  field  and
 laboratory tests where the  equilibrium
 assumptions were most closely  satisfied.

 REFERENCES

 1.   Chang,  D.P.Y, N.  Sorbo, G. Mur-
     chison, R. Adrian  and D. Simeroth,
     June,  1985.  "Evaluation of a
     Pilot-Scale Circulating Bed Combus-
     tor as  a Potential Hazardous Waste
     Incinerator." Paper No.85-776,
     Presented at the  78th Annual Air
     Pollution Control  Association  Meet-
     ing, Detroit,  MI.   Submitted for
     publication to the Journal of  the
    Air Pollution Control Association.

2.  Chang, D.P.Y.,  R.E. Mournighan and
    G.L.  Huffman,  1987.  "An  Equilib-
     rium Analysis  of the Combustion of
    Chlorinated Hydrocarbons." Submitted
    to the Journal  of  the Air  Pollution
    Control Association.

3.  Chang, D.P.Y.,  1987.  "Spray Combus-
    tion Studies  of Hazardous  Waste
    Incineration."  A report to the U.S.
    EPA  Hazardous Waste Engineering
    Research Laboratory for Cooperative
    Research Agreement CR813333-OT-0, to
    be submitted September, 1987.
  4.   Mallard,  G.,  1986.   Chemical  Ki-
      Netics  Division,  National  Bureau  of
      Standards.  Through  personal  communi-
      cation, supplied  thermochemical
      data  contained  in the  NASA-Lewis
      chemical  equilibrium code.

  5.   Reynolds, W.C., January, 1986.  "The
      Element Potential Method for  Chemi-
      cal Equilibrium Analysis:   Implemen-
      tation in the Interactive  Program
      STANJAN Version 3."  Department of
      Mechanical Engineering, Stanford
      University, Stanford,  CA 94305.

  6.   Shaub, W.M., 1982.   "Estimated
      Thermodynamic Functions for Some
      Chlorinated Benzenes,  Phenols and
      Dioxins."  Thermochemica Acta.
      58:11-44.  	

  7.   Stull, D.R. and H. Prophet, 1971.
      JANAF Thermochemical Tables. 2nd
      tdition. NSRDS-NBS 37.  RaTional
      Bureau of Standards, Washington,
      D.C.

 8.   Stull, D.R., E.F.  Westrum Jr.  and
      G.C.  Sinke, 1969.  The Chemical
     Thermodynamics of Organic Compounds.
     John Wiley and Sons, Inc.,  New
     York.                       „.

 9.  Tsang, W., 1986.  "Fundamental
     Aspects  of Key Issues In Hazardous
     Waste  Incineration." Presented at
     the ASME Winter  Annual  Meeting,
     Anaheim,  California, December,
     1986.

10.  Wendt, J.L.,   W.  P.   Linak, J. D.
     Kilgroe,  T.  A. McSorley and J. E.
     Drum,  September,  1986.   "Parametric
     Studies  Delineating  the Occurrence
     of Transient Puffs in a Rotary Kiln
     Simulator."  Presented  at the  Third'
     International  Symposium on  Operating
     European Hazardous Waste Management
     Facilities, Odense,  Denmark, Sep-
     tember,  1986.
Erratum:
     In the set of calculations for H:C1 = 3:1 (fuel equivalent to CH3C1), methane
(CH4) was inadvertently left out under fuel-rich conditions.  As a result C(s) was
predicted to be the major thermodynamically stable species at low temperatures (Figure
2a).  When CH4 is included, it becomes the major species and C(s) disappears as a
stable phase.  Figures 2a, b and c therefore represent the predicted system composi-
tions if CH4 (Figure 2a), C(s) (Figure 2b), and C6H6 (Figure 2c) are successively
removed from the system.  The major conclusions of the study remain unchanged.
                                          -239-

-------
               TABLE 1.   LISTING  OF  CHEMICAL SPECIES STUDIED
                                         Composition
                                                          Reference
Organic;:

methane
acetylene
ethylene
benzene
toluene
styrene
naphthalene
dibenzo-p-dioxin
blphenyl
anthracene

Chlorine Containing Species:

tetrachloromethane (carbon tetrachloride)
trlchloromethane (chloroforn)
dichloromethane (methylene chloride)
chloromethane
carbonyl dichloride (phosgene)
dichloroacetylene
tetrachloroethene  (perchloroethylene)
hexachloroethane
trlchloroethene (trichloroethylene)
pentachloroethane
1,1-dichloroethene (dichloroethylene)
l,2-d1chloroethene (dichloroethylene)
chl oroethene  (vinyl chloride)
1,1,2-tricMoroethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-di chloroethane
hexachlorobenzene
1,2,3-tri chlorobenzene
meta-dichlorobenzene
chl orobenzene
monochlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  (HCDD)
tetrachlorodi benzo-p-di oxi n  (TCDD)
octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  (OCDD)
chlorine,  atomic
chlorine,  molecular
hydrogen chloride

Nitrogen Containing Species:

methyl ami ne
 acetonitrile
ethylenimine
 ethyl ami ne
 acrylonitrile
 pyrrolidine
 pyridine
 aniline
 benzonitrile
 hydrocyanic acid (cyanide)
 nitroxyl hydride (nitrosyl  hydride)
 nitrous acid
 nitric  acid
 nitrogen,  atomic
 ammonia
nitrogen monoxide  (nitric oxide)
nitrogen dioxide
nitrogen trioxide
nitrogen,  molecular
dinitrogen monoxide (nitrous oxide)

Additional  Inorganic Species:

carbon  monoxide
carbon  dioxide
dihydrogen  monoxide (water)
oxygen, atomic
oxygen, molecular
CH4
C2H2
C2H4
C7H8
C8H8
C12HiQ
C14H10
CC14
CHC13
CH2Cl2
CH3C1
COC12
C2C12
C2C16
C2HC13
C2HC15
1,1-C2H2C12
1,2-C2H2C12
C2H3C1
1.1.2.C2H3C13
1,1-C2H4C12
1,2-C2H4C12
Cede
1,2,3-C6H3C13
2,4-C6H4Cl2
 C12H702C1
 Cl2H4°2c14
 C1202C18
 Cl
 Cl2
 HC1
 CH5N
 C2H3N
 C2H5N
 C3H3N
 C$3
 C7H5N
 HCN
 HNO
 HN02
 HN03
 N
 NH3
 NO
 N02
 N03
 N2
 N20
 CO
 C02
 H20
 0
 02
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
6
8
8
6
6
6
6
7
7
 8
 8
 8
 8
 8
 8
 8
 8

 8
 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
 7
                              -240-

-------
                            Log(Concentration)  VS  1/T
                                 (a) Fuel-Equivalent to CHCI3, E.R
                                                                       -pptn
              f  -
             3
             ¥
                   0.0004  O.OOOS  0.001?  0.0016  O.OO2O  C.OO24  O.OO28 O.OO32

                        	  Ibl Fuel Equivalent to CHCI3, E.R = 1.O1
              5'-
  — 1
  -2
  -3 -

  —5 -
  — 6 -
  -7 -
  -8 -
  —9 -
  -1O -
  -11  -
  12 -
   3 -
  14 -
  •15 -
  •16 -
  17 -
  18  -
  19  -
  2O
                      2500K
                               1000K
                                                500K
                                                                   294K
                   0.0004  00008. 0.0012 O.OO1S  O.OO2O  O.OO24  O.OO28  O.O032

                       	MFuel Equivalent to CHCI3. E.R = 1 .05
                                                                       ppm
 ppt
 —3 -
 — 4 -
 —5 -
 — 6 -
 —7 -
 -8 -
 —9 -
— 1O -
— 1 1  -
-12 -
— 13 -
—14 -
— 15 -
-16 -
— 17-
-,18  -
—19  -
-2O
                     2500K
                              1000K
                                               500K
                                                                  294K
                         O.OOOS  0.0012  0.0015  O.OO2O  O.OO24 O.OO2S  o!oO32
                                                                       ppm
ppt
Figure  1.  Composition versus inverse temperature for a system  equivalent  to
            CHClafuel (chloroform)  burned with air under (a) stoichiometric con-
            ditions,  (b)  1% oxygen deficiency  (c) 5% oxygen deficiency.   Symbols
            spaced  every  50K.
                                           -241-

-------
                          Log  (Concentration)  VS  1 /T
                              (») Fuel Equivalent to CH3CI. E.R.  ' —
                                                                   -ppm
              I
              s
                   O OOO4-  O OOOS O.OO12  O.OO16  O.OO2  O.OO24 O.OO28
                                   VCCS)   XC6H&
                              (b)Fuel Equivalent to CH3CI. E.R. — 1 .OS
                                                                    -ppm
                   O.OOOA O.OOOS O.OO12  O.OO1S  O.OO2O O.OO24  O.OO2S
                                     XC6H6
                               MFuel Equivalent to CH3CI, E.R. = 1.05
                                                                    -ppm
              S  -
                   O.OOO+  O O008  O.OO12  O.OO16  D.OO2  O.OO2+  O.OO2S  O.O032
                                         1/T — [1 /K]
               D  CO    4-  COCI2      O   CH2CI2       A   CH3C!      X  C2H4
Figure  2.   Composition  versus inverse temperature for a  system equivalent  to  a
            CHsCl fuel  (chloromethane) burned with air at  E.R.  = 1.05  (slightly
            fuel-rich):   (a)  allowing  C(s)  as a reaction  product (b) disallowing
            C(s) (c) disallowing both  C(s)  and C^Q as reaction products.   In
            reality, the same levels of  CHsCl are predicted, order of  ppb,  since
            reaction kinetics slow dramatically below 750K.
                                         -242-

-------
                              Log  (Concentration-)  VS  1/T
                                   la) Fuel Equivalent to CH2CI2, E.R. = 2.OO
                     ,—7 -
                     —8 -
                     -a
                     — 1O
                     -1 1
                     -12
                     -13
                     -14
                     -15
                     -16
                     —17
                     -19
                     -2O
                      O.OOO5  O.OCOV  O.CCO9  O.OO1 1  O.OO12 O.OO15  O.OO17  C.OO19
                                                                           ppm
      ppt

                                                1   CHCI3
                                                                          V  C
-------
                             Log  (Concentration-)  VS  1/T
                                                                         -ppm
                o»  _
                   —20
                     O.OOO5  O.OOO7  O.OOO9  O.OO1 1  O.OO13  O.OO15 O.OO17  O.OO19

                                            1/T - D/K]
                   CO     +  CH3CI      «   CH2CI2       a   CHCI3       X  CC14-
                        2QQOK
                                 (a) Fuel Equivalent to CH2CI2, E.R. = 2.OO
                                        I100QK
                                                                         -ppm
                I

                1
                     O.OOO5  O.OOO7  O.OOO9 O.OO11  O.OO13  O.OO15  O.OO17 O.OO19

                                            1/T — Q1/K1
                      +  C6H5C1       o   C6H4-CI2        A  C6H3CI3       X  C6CI6
                        20_flQ_K.
                                 (f)Fuol Equivalent to CH2CI2, E.R. — 2.OO
                                        11 OOP K
                                                                        500 K
                                                                         -ppm
                              DQODD-B a a a'D-D—a a—B—3	B	s	B
                     O.OOO5  O.OOO7  O.OOO9  O.OO1 1  O.OO13  O.OO15  O.OO17  O.OO19

                                             1/T"— [1/K]
                      CO    +   COCI2      o  MCDD     A  TCDD      x   OCDD
Figure 3.   Continued -  Composition versus inverse temperature for a  system  equiva-
             lent to  CH?Cl2  fuel  (dichloromethane) burned with  air under a fuel-rich
             condition (E.R.  = 2.0):   (d),  (e),  (f) present the same system, but
             excluding C(s).
                                             -244-

-------
                             Log  (Concentration)  VS  1/T
                                  (alFuel Equivalent to HCN, E.R. = 2.OO
                o   -i
                                                                      -ppm
                                                                      - ppm
                            O.OO1   O.OO14  O.OO1S  O.OO22  O.OO26  O.OCX2


                                 (b)Fuel Equivalent to C2H3N, E.R. = 2.OO
                                          1/T
                                             - [1/K]
                                             A  C3H3
Figure 4.   Composition  versus inverse  temperature for nitrogen based  fuels,
            E.R. = 2.0:   (a) fuel equivalent to HCN  (hydrogen cyanide)  (b) fuel
            equivalent to  Cz^  (acetonitrile) (c) fuel  equivalent to
            (acrylonitrile).
                                          -245-

-------
                           INFLUENCE OF ATOMIZATION PARAMETERS  ON
                         DROPLET STREAM TRAJECTORY  AND  INCINERATION
                                      J.  A.  Mulhoi land
                            U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency
                      Air and Energy Engineering Research  Laboratory
                             Research Triangle  Park,  N.C.  27711

                                      R.  K.  Srivastava
                                     Acurex  Corporation
                                     Durham, N.C. 27713
                                          ABSTRACT

     In the incineration of liquid hazardous wastes, atomization quality  may  limit
destruction efficiency.  Large, non-mean droplets in a fuel  spray can  pass  through the
flame zone prior to complete evaporation, and may subsequently fail  to burn completely
due to insufficient temperature and/or flame radicals.  A study is ongoing  to develop a
predictive understanding of individual droplet trajectories  in turbulent  diffusion
flames.  Experiments in a cold quiescent flow environment, a laminar flow flat-flame
burner, and a 100 kW swirling, turbulent combustor have been conducted to calibrate a
model to predict three-dimensional trajectories of single monodisperse droplet streams.

     Escape from the flame zone of large (> 200 ym diameter) fuel oil/xylene  droplets
has been observed as a function of initial  droplet size, velocity, spacing, and injection
angle.  Incomplete incineration of these droplets was found to be related strongly to
droplet penetration of the flame zone.  Minimum  model requirements to successfully
predict droplet trajectories in turbulent diffusion flames include: droplet spacing
effects on drag; droplet/droplet interaction effects on evaporation; evaporation effects
on drag; and turbulence effects on droplet ballistics.
INTRODUCTION

     Of the hazardous organic wastes pro-
duced in the U.S., about 75 percent are
liquids or dissolved in liquids.  With land-
fill disposal of these wastes becoming
Increasingly unacceptable due to growing
public concern and increased levels of
hazardous waste production, thermal destruc-
tion is being considered as an alternative
disposal method.  Successful incineration
requires that flame radicals and high tem-
peratures be combined in such a way that
the principal organic hazardous components
(POHCs) of the feed waste are destroyed
and that the formation of products of
incomplete combustion (PICs), which may
be as hazardous as, or even more hazardous
than, the original  POHCs, are minimized.
Proper spray atomization provides the
necessary dispersion of liquid fuel  and
waste into the oxidizer to avoid inciner-
ator failure by inadequate mixing.  Fuel
spray nozzles degrade with use and must
be replaced periodically.  Therefore,
there is a need to understand and quantify
how atomization parameters limit liquid
waste incineration so that a sound ra-
tionale for selecting and replacing spray
nozzles can be defined.

     Four group combustion modes of a fuel
droplet cloud have been identified [1],
with single droplet combustion being
applicable in practice to only a very
limited number of special situations.  Such
                                          -246-

-------
a special situation, however, can arise
during the incineration of liquid hazardous
wastes, where droplets with large diameters
(as much as an order of magnitude larger
than the mean) congregate at the outer edge
of fuel spray cones [2],  One or more of
these large, errant droplets may individu-
ally pass through, or bypass, the main
flame zone and lead to a failure mode in
the incinerator.  For example, bypassing of
as few as 1 drop out of 10 million drops
can lead to failure to meet a destruction
removal efficiency (ORE) in excess of 99.99
percent, as is required by law.

     Motivation for the current study lay,
therefore, in the need to predict single,
non-mean droplet trajectories in a turbu-
lent flame zone.  To this end, experiments
have been conducted (1) to determine mini-
mum requirements of a model that success-
fully predicts measured trajectories of
single monodisperse droplet streams in
three-dimensional turbulent diffusion
flames, and (2) to relate droplet penetra-
tion of the flame zone to potential
incinerator failure modes.
THEORY

     A semi-empirical numerical model is
being developed for predicting the ballis-
tics of burning droplet streams in tur-
bulent diffusion flames.  An important
input to this model is a proper represent-
ation of the drag coefficient on a non-i,
evaporating droplet in a stream.

Drag Coefficient

     While much information is available on
the relationship of the drag coefficient, -
CQ, of an isolated sphere to Reynolds
number, Re, little is available on the
dependence of CQ on Re and droplet spacing,
non-dimensionalized by droplet diameter, D,
as L/D.  As droplet spacing is reduced,
drag is reduced due to wake effects.  For
large droplet spacings, when droplet^ cease
to interact, the drag coefficient, CQ, for
each one is that of an isolated sphere, and
is only a function of Re.  For the slightly
distorted droplets formed by a vibrating
capillary droplet generator, the relation
of Lambiris and Combs [3] is recommended:
In the other, extreme, as droplet spacing
approaches the droplet diameter, the drag
coefficient may be assumed to approach the
friction drag coefficient of a long rod,
which can be calculated from the theory
of Glauert and Lighthill [4].  A general
form for the asymptotic form for the drag
coefficient, CQ, of a sphere as L/D
approaches unity is obtained by a Taylor
expansion about L/D = 1; thus, CQ is
hypothesized to be:

CQ(Re,L/D) = 0.755/Re + aReb [L/D-1]   (2)

where a and b are parameters to be deter-
mined from experiment.  The factor [aReb]
multiplying [L/D-1] is hypothesized to be
a function of Reynolds number, since the
extent of droplet interaction as L/D
approaches 1 will depend on Re, the latter
quantity determining the length of wake
behind each droplet [5],  An effective
and universal technique to correlate data,
obtained between regions of validity for
the asymptotic forms for CQ as L/D -•-> 1
and L/D -->«, is to use the asymptotic
expansion formula developed by Churchill
[61:
[CD(Re,L/D)]-n =
       [C5(Re,L/D).]-n + [C0(Re)]-n
                                                                               (3)
= 2
                        Re > 1(T
where n is a parameter to be obtained by
experiment.

Trajectory Model                •          ,

     A simple, numerical model has been
developed for predicting the ballistics
of an isplated burning droplet [7].  The
model is being refined to include effects
of droplet interaction on drag and evapor-
ation rate, evaporation effects on drag,
and turbulence effects .on droplet ballis-
tics.  The model is used to solve the
uncoupled equations of droplet motion in a
Lagrangian framework.  A three-dimensional
grid structure is established for specify-
ing the background gas velocity (vg), tem-
perature (Tg), and chemical specialion.
Calculations are terminated when the drop-
let exits the computational domain.

     Drag and gravitational forces are
assumed to be the only external  forces on
the droplet.  The drag force, FQ, has two
vector components (FQI and F02).  The drag
coefficient with droplet spacing effects
(CQ) is applied to the drag component in
the droplet stream direction; the drag
                                           -247-

-------
coefficient without spacing effects (CQ) is
applied to the other drag component.  FQI
is defined to be aligned with the droplet
velocity vector, v^;  FQZ is then perpen-
dicular to the plane containing vg and vj
(Fig.  1).  The magnitudes of the force
vectors are given by:
                    =
               CD*     "n
               C£*^vr
                                        (4)
where vri is the component of relative
velocity (vr = vj - vg) aligned with
Vd and vr2 = vr - vri.  The evaporating
droplet drag coefficient (* denotes mass
transfer) has been determined by Eisenklam,
et al. [8].  Evaporation has been found to
decrease drag by a factor ne (ie = CD*/CD)>
given by:
                   B)
where B is the mass transfer number,
defined by equation 8c.  Force balance
yields:
 SFX * max = FDlx + FD2x
 ZFy s may *
 ZFZ s maz =
where Fgrav is the gravitational force
(= -mg).
                                        (5)
                                        (6)
                                                   Heat and mass transfer are modeled in
                                              two steps:  droplet heating to the liquid
                                              boiling point, followed by droplet evapora-
                                              tion.  During droplet heating, its diameter
                                              is assumed to be constant (i.e., no eva-
                                              poration), and its temperature (T) is
                                              assumed to be uniform (i.e., low Biot
                                              number).  Here, the time rate of change of
                                              the droplet temperature is given by:
                                                        Nu k
                                                                                      (7).
                                              where the Nusselt number  (Nu) is calculated
                                              using an empirical relation.  After the
                                              droplet temperature  reaches the boiling
                                              point, evaporation begins.  In this stage,
                                              the time rate  of change of the droplet
                                              diameter is given by:
  dD       1              OR
  _ = _CR — [1 + 0.23 Re0-5] ns
  dt       20

where the evaporation constant (CB)  is
given by:
                                                                                     (8a)
                                                      8  k
CB =
             in (1+B)
                                                                                      (8b)
and where the mass transfer number (B) is
given by:
                                                 R  =
                                       (Be)
Combustion.-* O Droplet
  Gas ^-^ O  stream   „
         O  y        v-o—V.

      O     J—x  =$>    v
           z
Figure 1.  Vector diagram in three dimen-
           sions.  Velocities shown with
           dotted lines; forces shown with
           solid lines.
                                               Here, kg, p&, and cpjj, are properties of the
                                               liquid and background gas, Q is the heat of
                                               combustion of the droplet, L is the latent
                                               heat of vaporization, Y0
-------
.determined statistically, with the number
being sufficient to describe a distribution
of trajectory endpoints.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

     The objectives of this study are: (1)
to measure and predict the three-dimen-
sional trajectories of single monodisperse
droplet streams in turbulent diffusion
flames, and (2) to study the relation of
these trajectories with droplet inciner-
ation effectiveness.

     The 100 kW combustor, modified for
simulation of flame aerodynamics at the
expense of time/temperature simulation,
and monodisperse droplet generator (Fig. 2)
have been described previously [11].  Fir-
ing natural gas, two flame shapes with very
different mixing patterns were established:
Types C and A.  The short, swirling Type C
flame is stabilized by strong internal
recireulation, whereas the long, axial Type
A flame is stabilized by external recireu-
lation.  Radial profiles of temperature,
velocity (three components), and species
were measured.  Gas temperatures were
                                   ^Natural
                                       Gas
                                 Air
Figure 2.  Turbulent diffusion flame modu-
           lar combustion facility.  A 50
           cm internal.diameter, 90 cm long
           near-burner combustion module is
           water-cooled and insulated with
           a 4 cm thick  refractory lining.
           An International Flame Research
           Foundation burner has a movable-
           block air swirl generator and
           interchangeable fuel  nozzles.  A
           monodisperse droplet  generator
           is equipped with electronics for
           droplet separation.  It consists
           of a vibrator (1), liquid supply
           (2), orifice  (3), pulsed charg-
           ing ring (4), deflection plates
           (5), and trap (6). A water-
           cooled coil allows" for quenching
           the combustion gases  at variable
           axial  locations.
measured by suction pyrometry; axial,
radial, and tangential velocity components
were measured by using a specially designed
five-hole pitot probe (water-cooled with
0.8 cm uncooled tip, calibrated).  "In-
stantaneous" velocities of the turbulent
flow were recorded, with means and standard
deviations calculated by microcomputer.
Measured radial profiles of axial velocity
were consistent with overall mass balance.

     The droplet generator is a vibrating
orifice device with ancillary electronics
to facilitate droplet spacing variation.
Initial droplet diameter and spacing,were
measured via strobe photography.  Initial
droplet velocity was.calculated from the
vibrator frequency setting.  The fluid
tested, chosen on the basis of conductivity
(for electrostatic charging and deflection)
and viscosity (for droplet formation),
was a mixture of 80 percent (by volume)
Shell Oil Company fuel additive ASA-3,
comprised mostly of xylene (CgHio), and 20
percent distillate fuel  oil.

     Droplet trajectories were measured
with the aid of high speed photography.
Droplet destruction efficiency was deter-
mined by measuring the increased levels of
exhaust unburned hydrocarbons (UHC, or
surrogate POHC) and carbon monoxide (CO, or
PIC) due to droplet injection.  These-
emission measurements were taken from the
stack where the combustion gases are well
mixed.  Flame ionizatiori was used to detect
UHC, and an infrared instrument was used
for CO measurement.  A removable water-
cooled coil for quenching the combustion
gases was inserted, resulting in a bulk gas
residence time of 0.6 s before quenching.

     To determine droplet spacing effects
on the non-evaporating droplet drag coeffi-
cient, trajectory experiments were con-
ducted in the cold flow, quiescent environ-
ment within an observation tunnel.  Empiri-
cal parameters a, b, and n (equations 2 and
3) were evaluated.  Two-dimensional  laminar
flow experiments in a bench-scale flat-
flame burner were then conducted to cali-
brate the model, allowing minimum model
requirements to be determined without the
complexities of three dimensions and turbu-
lence.  In the 100 kW turbulent diffusion
flame experiments, baseline measurements
(i.e., without droplet injection) of com-
bustion gas temperature and velocity were
taken.  Droplet trajectories were observed
for a variety of initial  droplet stream
                                           -249-

-------
conditions, including variation in droplet
size, velocity, spacing, and injection
angle.  Finally, droplet incineration was
measured with the quench coil inserted.
COLD FLOW TRAJECTORIES

     Parameters a, b, and n were estimated
using data from 10 full trajectories.  Non-
linear regression for parameter estimation
was accomplished using a modified Marquardt
[12] algorithm, which is based on a multi-
dimensional search in parameter space for
the minimum value of a sum of squares
functional measuring deviation from the
data.  The least squares parameter estimates
were:  a = 34.8, b = -1.009, and n = 0.7072.

     Measured and predicted trajectory end-
points are shown in Fig. 3 for the 10 tra-
jectories in regression and for 39 addi-
tional trajectories.  More detailed results
from the experiments will be published in a
separate paper.
LAMINAR FLOW EXPERIMENTS

     Trajectories of non-burning and burn-
ing droplets in a flat-flame burner were
measured to test the model in this aero-
dynamically simple environment.  These
results, shown in Fig. 4, demonstrate that
droplet interaction effects on evaporation
rate and evaporation effects on drag are
important model requirements.  Droplet
interaction can reduce the evaporation rate
by up to 25 percent (ns = 0.75); evapora-
tion can reduce drag by as much as 70
percent (ne = 0.30).
TURBULENT DIFFUSION FLAME TRAJECTORIES

     In baseline tests without droplet
injection the combustion gas flow field was
characterized in terms of temperature and
velocity.  A peak temperature of 1750 K was
measured at the combustor centerline,
decreasing to 1100 K near the wall.  Axial,
radial, and tangential velocity components
were measured, with a peak total velocity
of 26 m/s measured near the burner quarl
exit.  The standard deviation of velocity
measurement often exceeded 50 percent of
the mean velocity.  Axial symmetry was
observed, both in temperature and velocity.
(See reference 11 for more details.)  These
results were then used as inputs to the
   80
   60
   40
   20
• Re'
V Re'
O Re
A Re'
C>Re
= 210, h • 11.7 cm
» 292, h * 14.0 cm
- 136, h =  7.3 cm
= 110, h -  7.3 cm
» 89.6, h = 8.6 cm
     01     23    45    678
                   In (L°/D)

Figure 3.  Cold flow trajectory endpoints.
           The range represents the hori-
           zontal distance travelled by
           the droplet stream while fall-
           ing a 'height h.  Points repre-
           sent measured trajectory end-
           points; lines represent model
           results.  The solid points and
           dotted line are data and model
           results from the best-fit non-
           linear regression.
trajectory model.

     The nominal droplet test condition
was: 225 urn initial diameter, 6.5 m/s
initial velocity, 130 diameters initial
spacing, and 30 degree injection angle.
The domain of droplet trajectories observed
for this nominal test condition is shown in
the two planes of observation in Fig. 5.
Superimposed on the cross-sectional view
along the centerline axis are lines of con-
stant mean axial velocity of the combustion
gases.  The droplets were observed to
follow an approximately common path until
they entered the high shear layer of the
reacting gas.  The burning times were very
short, as indicated by the burning droplet
"flecks" stretching only a few centimeters.
The large shaded area in Fig. 5 denotes the
distribution of burning droplets, Igniting
                                           -250-

-------
30
      25
Horizontal Distance (cm)
   20     15     10
                                      -25
                       Flat Plane
1 1
L°/D° =2.54
260 1030

80%
S

CCHCN/20% fuel oil
b b
= 234 urn
= 7 m/s
Figure 4.  Laminar flow  results.  The top
           plot shows trajectories of
           evaporating,  nonburning drop-
           let streams;  the bottom plot
           shows trajectories of  burning
           droplet streams.
       0     20     40    60
         Axial Distance (era)
Figure  5.  Trajectories of the  nominal  drop-
           let stream test condition.   The
           shaded  area represents  the  domain
           of droplet trajectory endpoints.
           An axial velocity profile is
           superimposed in the top view.
and burning out at various locations in
this area.  Thus, no single trajectory
describes a droplet stream test condition.
The existence of a domain of droplet stream
burnout locations, rather than a single
burnout point, is further evidence that the
gas velocity fluctuates with time (i.e.,
turbulence).

     Measured droplet axial penetration
distances  (i.e., axial distance droplet
travels prior to complete evaporation)
are listed  in Table 1.  Closely spaced
droplets penetrated farther than isolated
droplets.   Little effect of spacing was
observed for values greater than 20 dia-
meters.  Axial penetration distance roughly
doubled with a doubling of initial droplet
velocity.   Droplet penetration increased as
droplet diameter increased, as well.
Little change in axial penetration distance
was observed for isolated droplet injection
at 0, 30, and 45 degrees.  Finally, a
change in the combustion gas flow field
from a Type C to a Type A flame resulted in
a slight reduction in droplet penetration.

     Model  development to include turbulence
effects is  ongoing.

TABLE 1.  MEASURED TRAJECTORIES IN TURBULENT
         DIFFUSION FLAME EXPERIMENTS
Input Test
Variable
Diameter


Velocity


Spacing





Angle


Flame

Condition:
Value
225 pm
297
378
3.8 m/s
6.5
9.8
2.5 dia.
4.7
8.8
16.7
32.3
130
0 deg.
30
45
Type C
Type A
Axial
Mean
30
45
55
20
30
45
55
45
35
30
30
30
30
30
35
30
25
Penetration:
Min.
15
35
45
15
15
30
35
30
10
10
25
15
20
15
25
15
10
Max
45
60
70
25
45
60
75
65
55
45
40
45
45
45
50
45
35
*
cm


cm


cm





cm


cm

                                           -251-

-------
DESTRUCTION EFFICIENCY

     Tests were conducted with  the water-
cooled coil inserted downstream of the
Type C flame to quench the  combustion gases
and measure droplet incineration.   Combus-
tion gases were extracted from  the stack,
with emissions analyzed with  and without
droplet injection.  Droplet destruction
efficiency (DE) was calculated  as  the mass
of carbon emitted as CO and UHC divided by
the mass of carbon injected.

     Droplet incineration results  are shown
in Fig. 6.  The previously  measured mean
axial penetration is also shown, with dashed
lines representing the range  of droplet
trajectories.  These data indicate that
droplet destruction efficiency  is  related
inversely to droplet penetration,  which has
been shown to depend on droplet atomization
       properties.  Thus, predicting  droplet  ballis-
       tics may be one tool for anticipating  inciner-
       ator failure modes due to  poor atomization.
       CONCLUSION

            Large droplet  penetration  of the flame
       zone has been observed  as  a  function  of drop-
       let atomization  parameters in  tests with
       single monodisperse droplet  streams injected
       into turbulent diffusion  flames.   The incom-
       plete incineration  of these  hydrocarbon
       droplets has  been approximated by measuring
       CO and UHC emissions, and  a  strong correla-
       tion with droplet penetration  has been
       observed.  The short burning distances and
       relatively long  trajectories prior to igni-
       tion exhibited suggest  that  droplet aerody-
       namics prior  to  ignition  is  of primary impor-
       tance in predicting incinerator ORE.
           60
           so
         $. 40
         % 30
         &

         £ 20
         3

         O10


            0
            60
-I 01
o ~s
(0 cr
100


90  !





70


200 gg
  ' O
   x -a
100 sl
   —3-
   •a *<
                 100   200  300  400
                 Initial Diameter (urn)
                 (a) Size Variation
                                    500
                       In (L°/D°)
                    (c) Spacing variation
                  Initial Velocity (m/s)
                  (b) Velocity variation
DUI
I'0
J 40
1 30
O)
a.
.|H 20
O 10
0

**
•

***
• - - - -"*
1UU ,_,
1
90 S-5
— ^
80 ||
70
i i
200 =0
x -o
100 ^1
0-
0 "i~"
            '0    15    30   45    60
               Injection Angle (degrees)
                (d) Angle variation
                                                                             75
          Figure  6.   Droplet destruction efficiency and axial penetration  results.
                                            -252-

-------
     It was found that in order to predict
droplet penetration the model must include:

o  Droplet spacing effects on drag.
o  Droplet/droplet interaction effects on
      evaporation rate.
o  Evaporation effects on drag.
o  Turbulence effects on droplet ballistics.

Cold flow experiments have shown that
decreased droplet spacing reduces drag.
Laminar flow flat-flame burner experiments
have demonstrated that (1) droplet inter-
action reduces evaporation rate, and (2)
mass transfer reduces drag;  both effects
increase penetration.  Turbulent diffusion
flame experiments have shown the need for
statistically representing droplet pene-
tration.  The model is currently being
developed to include turbulence effects.

     This study represents a first step
toward developing a predictive understanding
of potential  incinerator failure modes due
to poor atomization.  While it is recognized
that further study with full sprays is ne-
cessary to establish nozzle operating guide-
lines based on atomization parameters for
incinerators, this ongoing work with mono-
disperse droplet streams provides a funda-
mental basis for establishing such criteria.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     All financial support was provided by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
Air and Energy Engineering Research Labor-
atory.  The authors are grateful  to J.V.
Ryan and J. VanRoy, of Acurex Corporation,
J.O.L. Wendt, Professor of Chemical Engi-
neering at the University of Arizona, and
S.B. Robinson and W.S.  Lanier, of Energy
and Environmental Research Corporation.
REFERENCES

1.  Chiu, H.H., Kim, H.Y., and Croke, E.J.,
    "Internal Group Combustion of Liquid
    Droplets," Nineteenth Symposium (Inter-
    national) on Combustion, The Combustion
    Institute, 1982, pp. 971-980.

2.  Kramlich, J.C., Seeker, W.R., and Samu-
    elsen, G.S., "Influence of Atomization
    Quality on the Destruction of Hazardous
    Waste Compounds," Twenty-First Sympo-
    sium (International) on Combustion,  The
    Combustion Institute, in press.
3.  Lambiris, S., and Combs, L.P., "Steady-
    State Combustion Measurements in a LOX-
    RP-1 Rocket Chamber and Related Spray
    Burning Analysis," Detonation and Two-
    Phase Flow, Vol. 6, 1962, p. 283.

4.  Glauert, M.B., and Lighthill, M.J.,
    "The Axisymmetric Boundary Layer on a
    Long Thin Cylinder," Proceedings of the
    'Royal Society of London, A, Vol. 230,
    1955, pp. 188-203.

5.  Panton, R.L., "Incompressible Flow,"
    1st Edition, John Wiley, New York,
    1984, pp. 384-401.

6.  Churchill, S.W., "The Interpretation
    and Use of Rate Data:  The Rate Con-
    cept," Ch. 10, McGraw-Hill, New York,
    1974, pp. 290-296.

7.  Ayers, W.H., Boysan, F., and Swithen-
    bank, J., "Droplet Trajectories in
    Three-Dimensional Gas Turbine Flow
    Fields," Air Force Report AFOSR-TR-81-
    0543, September 1980.

8.  Eisenklam, P., Arunachalam, S.A.3 and
    Weston, J.A., "Evaporation Rates and
    Drag Resistance of Burning Drops,"
    Eleventh Symposium (International) on
    Combustion, The Combustion Institute,
    1967, pp. 715-728.

9.  Labowsky, M., "Calculation of the Burn-
    ing Rates of Interacting Fuel Droplets,"
    Combustion Science and Technology, Vol.
    22, 1980, pp.  217-226.

10. Dukowicz, J.K., "A Particle-Fluid
    Numerical Model  for Liquid Sprays,"
    Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.
    35, 1980, pp.  229-253.

11. Mulholland, J.A., Srivastava, R.K., and
    Ryan, J.V., "The Role of Rogue Droplet
    Combustion in Hazardous Waste Incinera-
    tion," In:  Proceedings: Twelfth Annual
    Research Symposium on Incineration and
    Treatment of Hazardous Wastes, EPA-600/
    9-86-022 (NTIS PB87-119491), 1986, pp.
    413-420.

12. Marquardt, D.L.,,"An Algorithm for
    Least-Squares Estimation of Non-Linear
    Parameters," J.  "Soc. Indust. Appl.
    Math, Vol. 2, 1963, pp. 431-441.
                                          -253-

-------
                              DISTRIBUTION OF VOLATILE TRACE
                           ELEMENTS  IN EMISSIONS AND RESIDUALS
                      FROM PILOT-SCALE LIQUID INJECTION  INCINERATION

                           Johannes  W. Lee, Robert W. Ross,  II,
                             Ralph H. Vocque, Jerry W. Lewis,
                                 and Larry R. Water!and

                                     Acurex Corporation
                              Environmental Systems Division
                               Combustion Research Facility
                                Jefferson, Arkansas  72079
                                         ABSTRACT

    The EPA is currently developing  regulations  on trace  element  emissions  from  hazardous
waste incineration.  However, the data base to support  these  regulations  is very sparse.
Data on the effects of waste composition and  incinerator  operation  on  trace element
emissions are particularly lacking.  In response  to these  data  needs, EPA  is conducting
several test series at the Combustion Research Facility (CRF)  Jefferson,  AR.  The first
series of tests was performed to investigate  the fate of  volatile elements  in liquid
Injection incineration.  In these tests, trace amounts  of arsenic in the  form of arsenic
trloxlde (As203) and antimony in the form of  antimony trichloride (SbCl3) were fired  in  a
nvethanol base containing varying amounts of chlorobenzene and  carbon tetrachloride. Test
variables included incinerator temperature, excess air  level,  and feed chlorine  content.
As usually occurs in tests of this type, the  data show  a  general  inability  to obtain  mass
balance closure for the trace elements.  Both elements  are found  in the vapor phase at
high temperatures, but they condense to particulate  at  scrubber exit temperatures.  Other
conclusions await further data reduction and  evaluation.
INTRODUCTION

      In support of  the  EPA  Office  of  Solid
Waste  (OSW) regulation  development, the  CRF
conducted a series  of incineration tests  to
determine the fate  of two Appendix VIII
metals, antimony  and arsenic.   These
metal-emission tests are important because
risk  assessments  show that  metal emissions
from  otherwise properly operated
Incinerators can  be the largest component
of  risk to human  health and the
environment.  For these tests,  the CRF
liquid incinerator  system  (LIS) fired
mixtures of methanol, chlorobenzene,  and
carbon tetrachloride, spiked with  SbCl3  and
As203-  The objectives  of the test program
were:
•   To determine the amount and form of
    arsenic and antimony at various points
    in the incinerator system

*   To provide air pollution control device
    collection efficiency information

•   To measure the distribution of trace
    elements between flue gas and scrubber
    blowdown water

»   To quantify the relationship between
    trace element emissions and incinerator
    operating conditions

»   To evaluate whether the presence of
    trace elements affects other waste
    emission characteristics
                                            -254-

-------
APPROACH

    The LIS at  CRF  incinerates  "clean,"
pumpable and atomizable  liquid  wastes.
Figure 1 shows  a  simplified  schematic of
the incinerator system.   Combustion  takes
place in two refractory-lined chambers.
The system cleans the  combustion  product
gases in a packed-column  scrubber, an
ionizing wet scrubber, an activated  carbon
bed adsorber, and a  high-efficiency
particulate (HEPA)  filter.   An  induced-
draft (ID) fan  downstream of the  HEPA
filter draws a  slight  vacuum throughout the
incinerator/scrubber system  and vents the
combustion products  via  a stack.

    The test series  included variations of
three operating parameters:  feed chlorine
content, incinerator temperature, and
combustion excess air.  A Box-Wilson
factorial experimental design specified 18
test conditions, which included five levels
of each parameter.  Table 1  lists the
planned and achieved conditions.  Arsenic
and antimony concentrations  in the feed
were held constant at  12  and 40 ppm, re-
spectively, for all tests.   These concen-
trations in the feed material ensure that
the worst-case  concentrations in the stack
gas will  never  exceed  the threshold  limit
values (TLVs)  of 0.2 mg As/m3 and 0.5 mg
Sb/m3.  Furthermore, if all  the trace
metals leave the incinerator via the scrub-
ber blowdown water, their concentrations
would not exceed the EP toxicity limits
(5 mg As/L, no  limit established for Sb).

    Blends of methanol, carbon tetrachlor-
ide, and chlorobenzene in the feed produced
the various inlet chlorine concentrations
(0 to 28 percent).  The  liquid feed entered
the main combustion chamber  via a steam-
atomized nozzle at about  45  kg/hr (100
Ib/hr).   Auxiliary propane maintained the
incinerator at  the specified temperature
that ranged from 1,035° to 1,450°C (1,900°
to 2,640°F).  Combustion  air entered via
swirl  registers in the burner to produce
from 6-  to 11-percent excess oxygen at the
incinerator exit.

    Figure 2 identifies the  sampling points
and protocols.  Continuous monitors, (CMs)
measured 02, CO, and C02; volatile organic
sampling trains (VOSTs) collected samples
at the afterburner and the scrubber exits.
Thermal  desorption purge  and trap GC/ECD
was  used to  evaluate  21  volatile  organic
compounds.

     EPA  reference  Method 5 was  used  to
collect  samples  for particulate load and
arsenic  and  antimony  analyses.  The  Method
5 train  was  modified  to  ensure  collection
of antimony  and  arsenic  that  passed  through
the  particulate  filter.   It consisted of a
probe and a  glass  cyclone,  followed  by  a
filter and five  impingers.  The first
impinger contained 0.1 N NaOH.  The  second,
third, and fourth  impingers contained 0.2 M
(NH4)2S208 + 0.02  M AgN03.  The  last  im-
pinger contained silica  gel.  Following
collection and SW-846 digestion,  furnace
atomic adsorption  (AA) methods  were  used to
analyze  for  arsenic and  antimony.

RESULTS

     Table 1  shows  that 12  out of  18  planned
tests were completed.  The  remaining six
test conditions were  generally  unattainable
due  to flame stability problems at low
flame temperatures.   Of  the 12  tests  for '
which stable conditions  were achieved,  data
from 7 are currently  available.  These
results are  discussed below.  A final test
report will  be published to present  all  -
results and  conclusions.

Trace Element Discharges              -  •   •'•'•

    Mass balance for  antimony and arsenic
could not be established for any of  these
tests.  Table 2 lists the fractions  of
inlet antimony found  at  the afterburner
exit, the scrubber exit, and the.scrubber
blowdown water.  For  each of the tests
where the feed had 28-percent chlorine  and
one  of the 18-percent chlorine  tests, the
samples drawn at the  afterburner exit 'could
account for  no more than 2  percent of the •'<'•
inlet antimony.  Three tests with 18-
percent chlorine showed  53  to 146 percent
of inlet antimony  in the afterburner  exit
gas.   These three  are in the range of
acceptable mass balance  closure based on
past  experience.                           '•

    At the scrubber exit, between 7  and  36
percent of the inlet antimony can be
accounted for.  The higher  recovery  levels
occurred during lower-excess-oxygen tests.
Higher combustor temperature also appeared •
to coincide with with higher recovery at
the scrubber exit.
                                            -255-

-------
                                         Stack
                                                                            HEPA   I— Carbon bed
                                                                           filter  /   filter
                         Building wall
                  Afterburner chamber
                  (unflred)
           Ha In chamber
    Aux. propane,
   Liquid feed
Atomizing steam,

 Combustion air.
                                                                                .—Ionizing wet
                                                                               /  scrubber
             Sampling port

             Quench chamber,
                              VentuH scrubber—/
                       Figure 1.   Liquid  injection  incinerator system.
                            TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF  TEST CONDITIONS
             Feed Cl  content
                (percent)
  Primary combustor
temperature  (°C (°F))
Afterburner exit
  02  (percent)
Test
no.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Target
18
18
18
28
28
8
28
8
8
28
8
18
18
36
0
18
18
18
Actual

18
18
28
28
8
28
•.»
8
—
....
w»
18
35
0
18
....
17
Target
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
,250
,250
,250
,365
,130
,365
,365
,130
,365
,130
,130
,250
,250
,250
,250
,450
,045
,250
(2,280)
(2,280)
(2,280)
(2,490)
(2,070)
(2,490)
(2,490)
(2,070)
(2,490)
(2,070)
(2,070)
(2,280)
(2,280)
(2,280)
(2,280)
(2,640)
(1,915)
(2,280)

1
1
1
1
1
1

1



1
1
1
1

1
Actual
— —
,336
,228
,307
,137
,290
,399
—
,425
—
—
—
,203
,293
,265
,450
—
,176
__
(2,437)
(2,243)
(2,384)
(2,079)
(2,354)
(2,551)
—
(2,597)
—
—
--
(2,198)
(2,359)
(2,310)
(2,642)
—
(2,148)
Target
8.4
8.4
8.4
10.1
10.1
10.1
6.7
10.1
6.7
6.7
6.7
5.5
11.3
8.4
8.4
8.4
1 8.4
11.3
Actual
—
8.8
8.4
10.6
11.0
10.1
6.7
--
5.9
— —
— -
--
11.7
9.2
8.1
7.5
—
10.8
Note
a

b


b

a
b
a
a
a

b
b

a
_T— j^^jjrj-
      aUnable to attain  target  condition  due to unstable  flame.
      bSample analyses  not complete.
                                                -256-

-------
                                                                                         Stack
                                                Parameter
                           Auxiliary                     CMs                 H5        VOST
     Sampling   Haste   Waste   fuel      Air     Scrubber  (02, CO, C02,  Volume  (particulate,  (volatile
      point    feedrate  feed   feedrate  feedrate  blowdown     NOX)       flow  _  metals)     organics)
1 X X X X
2
3 X
4
5

XXX
X
X X
X X Xa

X

X

   aParticulate on1.y.
                                Figure 2.  Sampling  protocol.
                        TABLE  2.   ANTIMONY DISCHARGE DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                         Antimony discharge distribution
                                                              (percent  of feedrate)


Test
no.
4
5
7
13
18
16
2

Feed Cl
content
(percent)
28
28
28
18
17
18
18
Primary

combustor Afterburner
temperature
(°C (°F))
1,307 (2,384)
1,137 (2,079)
1,399 (2,551)
1,203 (2,198)
1,176 (2,148)
1,450 (2,642)
1,336 (2,437)
exit 02
(percent)
10.5
10.8
6.1
11.8
10.7
7.4
9.2

Afterburner
exit
flue gas
0.18
0.24
1.8
oai
53.
146.
104.

Scrubber
exit
flue gas
14
13
30
6.6
14
36
20

Scrubber
bl owdown
water
22
16
12
87
124
8.3
12
    Scrubber blowdown water  contained
between  8  and 124 percent of the inlet
antimony.   No clear trend is apparent for
these blowdown recovery rates.

    Table  3 shows that, at the  afterburner
exit, where temperatures were above 760°C
(1,400°F),  the vapor portions of the ex-
tracted  samples contained an average of 55
percent  (range 24 to 90) of  the collected
antimony.   At  the scrubber exit  where the
temperature was 74°C (165°F),  the vapor
accounted  for  an average of  8  percent
(range 0 to 38) of the collected antimony.

    Tables  4 and 5 list the  arsenic mass
balance and phase distribution data.
Except for  one test, arsenic recovery was
poor.  Analyses of collected afterburner
exit gas,  scrubber exit gas, and blowdown
                                             -257-

-------
                   TABLE 3.  ANTIMONY FLUE GAS DISTRIBUTIONS
                                            Antimony  distribution  between  particulate
                                                 and  vapor  phase in  the  flue gas
                                                             (percent)
                 Primary
Afterburner exit
Scrubber exit

Test
no.
4
5
7
13
18
16
2
Feed C1
content
combustor
temperature
(percent) (°C (°F))
28
28
28
18
17
18
18
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
,307
,137
,399
,203
,176
,450
,336
(2,384)
(2,079)
(2,551)
(2,198)
(2,148)
(2,642)
(2,437)
Afterburner
exit 02
(percent)
10
10
6
11
10
7
9
.5
.8
.1
.8
.7
.4
.2
Parti cul ate
62
49
53
42
21
76
10
Vapor
38
51
47
58
79
24
90
Particulate
99
62
99
99
100
99.9
82
Vapor
1
38
1
1
0
0
18





.1

                    TABLE 4.  ARSENIC DISCHARGE DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                Arsenic  discharge  distribution
                                                      (percent  of feedrate)


Test
no.
4
5
7
13
18
16
2

Feed C1
content
(percent)
28
28
28
18
17
18
18
Primary
combustor
temperature
(°C (°F))
1,307 (2,384)
1,137 (2,079)
1,399 (2,551)
1,203 (2,198)
1,176 (2,148)
1,450 (2,642)
1,336 (2,437)

Afterburner
exit 02
(percent)
10.5
10.8
6.1
11.8
10.7
7.4
9.2

Afterburner
exit
flue gas
ND
ND
1.7
ND
4.0
77
10.2

Scrubber
exit
flue gas
9.0
5.1
58
ND
2.2
9.4
4.3


Scrubber
bl owdown
3.8
2.3
6.4
2.8
3.1
1.9
0.51
ND -- Not detected.
                                       -258-

-------
                        Table 5.  ARSENIC  FLUE  GAS  DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                  Arsenic  distribution  between particulate
                                                       and vapor phase  in the flue gas
                                                                  (percent)

Test
no.
4
5
7
13
18
16
2
Feed Cl
content
(percent)
28
28
' 28 '
18
17
18
18
Primary
combustor
temperature

. 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(°C
,307
,137
,399
,203
,176
,450
,336
(F
(2
(2
(2
(2
(2
(2
(2
Afterburner exit
Afterburner
Scrubber
exit
exit 0?
°)). (percent)
,384)
,079)
,551)
,198)
,148)
,642)
,437)
10
10
6
11
10
7
9
.5
.8
.1
.8
.7
.4
.2
Particulate Vapor
ND
ND
43
.. ND
32
76
83
ND
ND
57
ND
68
24
17
Particulate
100
83
100
ND
100
100
94
Vapor
0
17
0
ND
0
0
6
ND -- Not detected.

water samples could account for no more
than 10 to 15 percent of the incoming
arsenic.  The general low recovery rates
rendered it difficult to identify any
trends.  However, it was apparent that
most, if not all, of the collected arsenic
was found on the particulate portion of the
sample train.  This is in agreement with
the antimony results.

Destruction and. Removal Efficiencies , (DREs)

    The tests demonstrated high DREs for
both carbon tetrachloride and chlorobenzene
(Table 6).  Chlorobenzene DREs were higher
than those for carbon tetrachloride.
Carbon tetrachloride DREs were greater than
99.99 percent at the afterburner exit.
These increased to greater than 99.999
percent at the scrubber exit.  Similarly,
chlorobenzene DREs ranged from 99.999
percent at the afterburner exit to greater
than 99.9999 percent at the scrubber exit.
The available data do not suggest any
discernible effect of temperature, feed
composition nor excess air.  This is in
general agreement with previous CRF data,
which has consistently shown high DREs for
concentrated feed materials.

Products of Incomplete Combustion (PICs)

Incineration produces low levels of PICs.
The CRF routinely analyzes VOST samples for
21 organic compounds with  GC/ECD.   Tables  7
and 8 summarize the higher concentration
compounds found during these  tests.   At the
afterburner exit,  carbon tetrachloride
(POHC) was highest among the  21  compounds
(>100 ug/dscm).  Other chlorinated  alkanes
and alkenes were present in the  10-  to  100-
ug/dscm  range.  Chlorobenzene (POHC)
concentrations were similar to those  of the
common chlorinated'PICs.

    At the scrubber exit,  PIC concentra-
tions are about one-tenth  of  those  at the
scrubber inlet; i.e., afterburner exit.
Carbon tetrachloride  (a POHC)  ranged  from  4
to 23 jig/dscm.  The highest concentration
occurred at a  low  excess air  condition.
Chlorobenzene  (the other POHC) ranged from
1 to 4 ug/dscm and did not appear to
correlate with temperature or excess  air.
Other PICs include methylene  chloride,
which is ever-present at high levels  '(15 to
67 ug/dscm).   Chloroform was  also present
and ranged from 9  to 74 ug/dscm.  Other
.chlorinated alkanes and alkenes, hexane,
benzene, and toluene were  below  10
ug/dscm.

DISCUSSION

    The data evaluated to.,  date point  to the
lack of mass balance closure  for the  trace
volatile elements.  The exact  cause  for the
low recovery rates for the two elements at
                                           -259-

-------
                                  TABLE 6.  POHC DREs



Carbon
tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
ORE (percent)
Test
no.
4
5
13
18
16
2
Afterburner
exit 02
(percent)
10.5
10.8
11.8
10.7
7.4
9.2
Corabustor
Temperature
(°C ("F))
1,307 (2,384)
1,137 (2,079)
1,203 (2,198)
1,176 (2,148)
1,450 (2,642)
1,336 (2,437)
Feed
concentration
(percent)
22
24
11
11
11
11
Afterburner
exit
99.9988
99.9982
Scrubber
exit
..a
99.999945
99.99983
99.99973
99.99953
99.99985
Feed
concentration
(percent)
24
22
24
23
24 '
23
DRE
Afterburner
exit
99.9996
99.999995
(percent)
Scrubber
exit
99.999984
99.999987
99.999981
99.999981
99.999985
'Data not available; sampling train contamination occurred.
                         TABLE  7.   AFTERBURNER EXIT PIC  DATA
       Test no.                                         42
       Afterburner exit 02  (percent)                   10.5              9.2
       Primary combustor temperature  (°C (°F))   1,307  (2,384)    1,336 (2,437)
       POHC concentration  (tig/dscm)

       Carbon tetrachloride
       Chlorobenzene

       PIC concentration  (yg/dscm)

       Methylene chloride
       1,1-dichloroethylene
       Chloroform
       1,2-dichloroethylene
       Tri chloroethylene
       Benzene
       1,1,2-trichloroethane
       Hexane
       Toluene
110
 37
 18
 38
 70
 38
 21
 13
 61
 15
 12
150
 11
 77
  6.
 12
 58
 14
  3
 23
 10
 11
                                          -260-

-------
                            TABLE  8.   SCRUBBER  EXIT PIC DATA
   Test no.
   Afterburner exit 02  (percent)
   Primary combustor temperature  (°C  (°F))
     5
  10.8
 1,137
(2,079)
    13
  11.8
 1,203
(2,198)
    18
  10.7
 1,176
(2,148)
    16
   7.4
 1,450
(2,642)
     2
   9.2
 1,336
(2,437)
   POHC concentration  (ug/dscm)

   Carbon tetrachloride
   Chlorobenzene

   PIC concentration  (ug/dscm)

   Methylene chloride
   1,1-di chloroethylene
   Chloroform
   1,2-dichloroethylene
   1,1,1-t ri chloroethane
   Tri chloroethylene
   Benzene
   1,1,2-trich!oroethane
   Hexane
   Toluene
  4.4
  1.6
  7.5
  1.4
 12
  1.6
 23
  1.8
 12
  4.0
15
0.6
74
8.7
0.2
1.3
2.6
9.5
0.9
1.6
34:
ND
8.9
NDa *
0.8
1.9
1.3
1.9
1.9
1.9
42
ND
8.8
ND
0.6
3.3
1.6
0.5
5.5
8.0
67
ND
18
2.4
1.0
2.1
1.0
5.2
2.0
2.7
18
ND
25
3.1
1.3
1.6
6.3
ND
2.0
4.0
   ND — Not detected.

the afterburner are not known.   It may  be
due to inconsistent capture efficiencies or
the sampling train's ability to  capture
these volatile metals.  Other unknown
factors may play a role in the sampling
train's performance.

    The information obtained to  date tends
to suggest the following:

•   The presence of trace amounts of
    antimony and arsenic does not affect
    POHC ORE.

•   Both arsenic and antimony appear to
    show up in considerably greater amounts
    as solids, especially at lower
    temperatures.
       The data reported here are complex.
   Trends  identified earlier are weak at best.
   Upon completion of the sample analysis of
   the remaining test samples, a clearer
   picture may emerge.  These will  be reported
   in  the  test final report, to be  submitted
   at  the  conclusion of the test program.
   ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

       The work reported in this paper was
   performed  under the CRF operations and
   research contract with EPA/HWERL.  This
   support and the guidance provided by the
   EPA Project Officer, R. E. Mournighan, is
   gratefully acknowledged.
                                            -261-

-------
                   ASSESSMENT OF RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION
                                OF RCRA WASTES

                                Joan V. Boegel
                             Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.
                        Wakefield, Massachusetts 01880

                                   ABSTRACT

     Incineration is generally recognized as a well-demonstrated technology
for the treatment of organic hazardous wastes including spent solvent
wastes.  Most studies of incineration have been concerned with the
effectiveness of the process to destroy key organic constituents of a waste
(destruction and removal efficiency, DRE) as measured by the relative quantity
of those organics in the incinerator off-gas. In contrast, this paper focuses
on characterization of the solid and liquid residues generated by incineration
of RCRA wastes.

     Two incineration systems are evaluated - one at a commercial treatment,
storage and disposal facility (TSDF) accepting organic wastes from a variety
of industrial generators (Facility A) and the other operated on-site at a
chemical industry manufacturing plant (Facility B). Both systems generate two
types of residue - ash and scrubber wastewater. Ash from both facilities is
currently landfilled. Treatment of the scrubber wastewater at Facility A
results in a metal sulfide sludge, which is also landfilled. At Facility B,
scrubber wastewater is neutralized and injected into a deepwell on site.

     All ash, sludge and wastewater samples collected at these facilities were
analyzed for priority pollutant organics and metals. The ash and sludge
samples were also subjected to the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP). Ash from Facility A exhibited unacceptably high TCLP extract
concentrations of two volatile organics - methylene chloride and
tetrachloroethylene, indicating incomplete combustion of solvent wastes. Ash
from facility B passed the TCLP for both metals and organics, but both ash and
extract levels of three non-TCLP metals - Copper, Nickel, and Zinc - were
high. Scrubber wastewater from both facilities had no significant
concentrations of toxic organics. However, copper, lead, nickel and zinc were
found at concentration greater than 50 mg/1 in the scrubber wastewater from
Facility B. This paper presents and evaluates quantitative data describing the
wastes incinerated and the resulting residues at both facilities.
                                       -262-

-------
INTRODUCTION

     The RCRA Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984 call for a ban on the
land disposal of hazardous wastes.  EPA is
required to evaluate technologies for each
waste category and to establish treatment
performance levels for wastes based on the
lowest levels achieved by a "best demon-
strated available technology".  Treatment
levels from incineration have been
selected for F001-F005 spent solvents.
Incineration is also likely to be an
important technology for most other listed
organic wastes.  Therefore, the quantity,
chemical characteristics, and fate of
incineration residuals are important.

     Incineration is a controlled high
temperature oxidation process by which
organic wastes are destroyed. The com-
bustion reactions of incineration should
convert organic wastes to gaseous C02 and
water vapor. If the waste contains cnlori-
nated organics, then HC1 and free chlorine
gas are also generated as incineration by-
products. Incineration of wastes contain-
ing organic sulfur or nitrogen results in
formation of SOx and NOx, respectively.
Air pollution control devices - often wet
scrubbers - are used to control emissions
from hazardous waste incinerators.

     The residues from incineration are
the off-gas, ash and scrubber wastewater.

     The effectiveness of an incinerator
and its associated air pollution system is
normally measured in terms of destruction
and removal efficiency (ORE), as defined
by the following formula:
                     10055
             Win
    Win =
mass feed rate of the principal
hazardous constituent(s) to the
incinerator
    Wout = mass emission rate of the
           principal organic hazardous
           constituent(s) to the
           atmosphere as measured in the
           stack prior to discharge.
     This formula considers only off-gas
emissions to the atmosphere, ignoring  the
other residuals of incineration - ash  and
scrubber wastewater.

     Samples of wastes, ash and scrubber
wastewater were collected from two full-
scale incineration facilities as part  of a
program to evaluate alternatives to land
disposal. This paper summarizes the
operations at both facilities and presents
and evaluates quantitative data describing
the wastes incinerated and the resulting
residues.

FACILITY A

Facility Description

     Facility A is a commercial hazardous
waste treatment facility accepting drummed
organic, hazardous wastes from a variety of
industrial generators. Typical wastes
accepted for incineration at Facility  A
include chlorinated and nonchlorinated
solvent wastes (F001, F002, F003, F004,
F005), paint formulating wastes, furniture
strippers, printing inks and dyes, polymer
wastes, agricultural products,
pharmaceutical production wastes, lab
packs and contaminated soils. The facility
does not accept PCBs, dioxins, compressed
gases, radioactive waste, or organic
wastes containing significant
concentrations of potassium, sodium,
lithium,  mercury or lead.

     Figure 1  shows a process flow diagram
for Facility A.  Waste organic liquids are
pumped from drums into one of four 6000
gallon steel blend tanks. Waste liquids
are selected such that the final blend has
greater than 8000 BTU/lb and less than 40$
chlorine.

     Drums containing primarily solids,
nonpumpable materials or residues
remaining from liquid pumping are
transported to the drum processing
building. Operators use an air-driven
cutting tool to remove the tops of steel
drums. Drums are then upended and dumped
                                          -263-

-------
            QBf,
               £io
C 0)
II
      II
     -264-

-------
 onto a coarse-mesh screen above a steel
 tank. Any free liquids drain into the tank
 and are subsequently pumped to a blend
 tank. Solids remaining on the screen are
 shoveled into 30 gallon fiber packs. Empty
 drums are steam-cleaned, and the cleaning
 solutions are added to a blend tank.

      The incinerator at Facility A is a
 dual chamber unit with a thermal input
 rating of 19.8 million BTU/hr.  All wastes
 are introduced into the lower chamber.
 Liquid waste from the blend tank is
 injected into this chamber by atomization
 with steam.  Solids in fiber packs are
 loaded into  the incinerator by  a ram
 feeder.  Solids residence time in the lower
 chamber  is estimated at 15 to 30 minutes.
 The upper chamber is an afterburner used
 to complete  combustion. Fuel oil is burned
 in this  chamber to maintain required
 temperature.

      Dry ash  residue is conveyed from the
 lower chamber out of the incinerator
 building and  is dumped into a roll-off
 container. The ash is transported off-site
 to a permitted hazardous waste  landfill.

      A caustic scrubber is employed  for
 removing  air  pollutants,  particularly HC1,
 from the  stack gas.  This scrubber permits
 burning  wastes with  up to 40 percent total
 chlorine  content.

      The  approximate  feed and effluent
 flowrates during  the  sampling period were
 as  follows:

 Feed
 Solid waste   =  48.1  ft3/hr
 Liquid waste   =  28.3  ft^/hr

 Residuals
 Bottom Ash  =  5.25 ft^/hr
 Scrubber Wastewater   =  722 ft^/hr

     Scrubber wastewater  treatment
 includes pH adjustment, hydroxide and
sulfide precipitation of heavy metals,
clarification, pressure chamber
filtration, and sludge dewatering with a
recessed plate filter press (Figure 2).
      Scrubber water collects in a 400
 gallon steel tank and is pumped to the
 scrubber wastewater treatment building.
 The wastewater flow is typically 90 gpm.

      The wastewater pH is adjusted to 9.0
 with 25 percent caustic in a 7,000-gallon
 mixed tank.  Sodium sulfide is added to
 precipitate  heavy metal sulfides which
 remain in solution after hydroxide
 precipitation' at pH 9.0. Ferric chloride
 is added to  this tank as a conditioning
 agent to improve clarification and
 filtration.  High cationic synthetic
 polyelectrolyte polymer is added before an
 in-line static mixer as the wastewater is
 pumped to the clarifier.

      Wastewater is clarified in a 20,000
 gallon steel tank which overflows to  a
 second 20,000 gallon steel storage tank.
 Clarified effluent is then pumped through
 a  seven element filter.  The elements  are
 operated in  a parallel and each element
 contains a 200 mesh polypropylene filter
 bag.  The filter is backwashed  once each
 shift,  and the backwash water  is returned
 to  the clarifier.

      A portion of the  treated,  filtered
 wastewater is  recycled to  the  scrubber,  A
 blowdown  stream is  stored  in a  third
 20,000 gallon  steel  tank.   Blowdown
 wastewater from this storage tank  is
 trucked  periodically to  the municipal
 Wastewater treatment plant.

     Sludge  from  the clarifier  is  pumped
 to a 7000 gallon  steel conditioning tank.
Synthetic polyelectrolyte  is added to  this
mixed  tank as a filter aid. The
conditioned sludge is pumped to a  recessed
plate  filter press once each shift. The
filtrate is returned to the clarifier, and
the dewatered sludge is collected  for
landfill disposal.
                                          -265-

-------
                                       g
                                       I
                                       I
-266-

-------
 Waste Characterization

      During a week-long sampling program,
 samples of five discrete solid wastes and
 five discrete liquid wastes were obtained.
 In addition, a sample of the liquid waste
 from the blend tank was taken. As Table  1
 shows, the major volatile organic
 components of these wastes were the common
 solvent compounds acetone, benzene,
 chloroform, methylene chloride, methyl
 ethyl ketone, tetrachloroethylene,
 toluene,  trichloroethylene and xylene.
 These nine components account for about
 54 percent by weight of the liquid waste
 blend.   Surprisingly, the liquid waste
 contained 28.7 weight percent water and
 its fuel  value was only 6,824 BTU/lb,
 below the plant's stated goal of
 _>8000 BTU/lb.   The liquid blend's organic
 chloride  content of 27.99 percent was
 below the plant's stated upper limit of
 40 percent.

      The  five  solid wastes  represent
 diverse industrial sources.   Information
 supplied  to  Facility A  by the waste
 generators  indicates that the five  solid
 wastes were  (1)  epoxy resins,  (2)  used
 nylon mesh filter  bags,  (3)  waste
 tetrachloroethylene and  wax  mixture,
 (4) waste methylene chloride and polymer,
 and (5) eye shadow  with  tetrachloroethylene.

     Measureable levels  of chromium,
 copper, lead, nickel  and zinc were  found
 in all waste samples.  The highest metal
 concentration was 759 mg/L copper in the
 liquid waste blend.

 Residue Characterization

     The wastes described in the previous
 section were incinerated during a 36-hour
 period.  Beginning 4 hours after the first
 fiberpack of solid waste was fed to the
 incinerator, grab samples of ash were
 collected from the ash chute every two
 hours until the incineration run was
 complete.   The individual grab samples
were composited to form a single ash
residue sample representative of the
 burn.  Tables 2 and 3 summarize the
 analytical data for this sample.

      Compositional analysis of the ash
 shows significant concentrations of
 several volatile and semivolatile organic
 compounds.  The tokicity characteristic
 leaching procedure was run on the ash
 sample.  Extract levels of two volatile
 organics - methylene chloride and
 tetrachloroethylene - exceed the
 regulatory levels for these compounds,
 meaning that the ash must be classified as
 a hazardous waste.

      Metals appear to have concentrated in
 the ash as expected,  with most metals
 present in the ash at levels greater than
 their concentrations  in any of the waste
 samples.   Arsenic exhibits the greatest
 concentration factor.   Its ash
 concentration - 42 nig/kg - is 52 times the
 highest waste sample  arsenic
 concentration.   Copper  at 13,800 mg/kg is
 the major  metal  component of the ash.
 Both TCLP  and EP extracts were analyzed
 for toxic  metals.   None  of the eight
 listed  EP  Toxicity metals were found above
 regulatory levels  in  either  extract.
 Comparison of extract and compositional
 metals  levels indicates  that the ash is
 fairly  resistant  to leaching of metals.

      The ash  had a  total  solids content of
 about 60 percent by weight and  a specific
 gravity of 1.28.

      Data  on  the scrubber wastewater and
 its  treatment products are summarized  in
 Table 4.  With the exception of acetone
 which was also found in the laboratory
 blank, none of the organic compounds
 measured in the wastes or ash were
 detected in the scrubber wastewater or  the
 filtered effluent.

     Seven toxic metals were reported
above detection levels in the scrubber
wastewater at concentrations ranging from
0.6 mg/L for arsenic to 11.0 mg/L for
copper.   Metal concentrations in the
                                          -267-

-------














8
•H
J3
n)
N
LI
Q)
o
co
LI
cd
6
X>
CO
n<
3
4J
O
£

T^
a
X
n















ir\

•a
•H
•g
CO

o
0 0
10 - -2 SJ
nt X! £ C
x: x> o co
CO "H (fl i-H
cu S -P J?

W EH CD
a> »a
rr
•a
.-I
w


m
2
i-H
o
CO



C Li
Q) tt) CO CU
jj i-i -a E
CO r*»*lH P*>
«! X: L, ,-H
3 -u ; o o
Q> rH Cu
0
o m
1?
L, m
JJ
O) 0)
H §
0) i-H
co x:
a) -u
3 
on

ooooooooo
ooooooooo
too C^OOt—.=3*vO CMCO
COCMCMT~OOOvOC— CM
o =f <^ en on oo co
.=r \o CM en o «-
o
— . (DO)

CO TD O (U . 'a) a.
S 0 trf XJ M —
OS O >> O -P J
0 guSb1 § g
Ct] O C W •-! t« H
^J 0)0) X1QJO 2-
E-* OQ)£->j>*rtl> O
> «3lCQOS.Ec-|c-|c-|X t—
O'— inCMCMOOOOOOO
• - CM • • O • • • • '
j3~ ^^ T— ^3 ^- OO ^3 LO LO Cj ^O
V • ^" f1"
Q






0<-^OCMt-OCOOO
*— O«— OOOOOCM>J3
o



O'— ocMinc— ooo
v-O'-OOOCM'-CM
0








OCOOCMOOOOOO
«— ooO'— in^-ooo
v v o »-




O»— OCMLO"— OOO
.— O'— OO -CMOOO
v











CM CO
o o




t- 0
o in









=r o
«- o
t—





«- o
O CM





. T— <— . -co • ir> • •— •
<— • «— O O • O C— •=!• 'CO
VO v^"— CM OOO




4J
c
CO
1 — 1
«J
cd "cd
X -p
a> o
g i-|
c1 o -3 E 3 3
O -H § "—I 3 >(H "'H Li









>>
Li i-H
•iHco-H>>Eooo.'ap^
4i CQ Li Li TJ Lj tj M* C
S^f^t^cjooOb.
*~

1 *•« *-*
1 ^ S

-268-

-------












c
c

a
is
£.

O
ctf
t.
a.
X
u
0)
03
n)
3
cfi

4-5
•iH
|jj
O
cd

• — •
lu
§
•rH
§
0

0)
rH
a)
E~*

















O
in o o
=*= T3 rH (U
•a xi 4-5 o (u
•rH CO -H s
CO >> 0) J->
ca H ,.H ;»
•H «) XI £-. rH
rH 3 4J 0 0
O 0) rH 0,
co 2: x;
o
i
o
S- X
O (B
" — 1 3
00 X!
=* o -o
nJ c
"0 £H Cfl
•H 4-3
rH 0) tU
O E-< C
CO *,
03 S
3  4-5 60
•HI — i i — i 
NX *— .










O =f O O
c- o ro in
o







0 CM O O
c— o •*- co
NX NX





VO Cvl O CM
• » • •
«— O «— «—
NX NX VO







CO
ta
CO

^
11 §
•rH t, -H
C (1) rH 03
0) > rH o Cd
rH rH OJ C 3=
co co e-< t>a o

^3- t— CO «- ^- O «-
VO O OO OMn O CM
• • • • CTi CO O
ON c— «— CM in - -
CM • CM =r
t- vo
VO





o .=r in c— in o o>
t- ^r CM ^r o o *-
«- «- CM • CO C—
»- CM





in «- in «- in o o
cr. in «- 3- on o in
• • • • «- co t~
o cr>-r- CM ro - >
co in • o in

CM








ON O CO C— in O )— i
co .=r co m^r o s
• • • • C- CM Q
=r co CM o oo -
oo • <-
^— CO
in





o co crv «- in o o
vo o =r ro «— o in
. . . . CM <— co
co en o o o - -
vo • in in
' — -=r <~
c—



in CM t— cr- =f o 3-
CNJ O • CTvCO O CM
• -CO • O O CO
CM t— CM t— • - -
ro CM «— vo vo
in
 o 03
C 60 -rH >,T3
O O £- C 4-> -H
XI t.  o
al >> 
-------
            Table 2.  Facility A Ash Analytical Data* - Organics
PARAMETER
Volatile Organics
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1,1 trichloroethane
1,2 dichloropropane
trichloroethylene
benzene
l»-methyl-2-pentanone
tetrachloroethylene
toluene
chlorobenzene
ethylbenzene
styrene
xylenes
raethanol
Semivolatile Organics
Phenol
Nitrobenzene
2,4 dimethyl phenol
naphthalene
2-nitroaniline
dimethyl phthalate
diethyl phthalate
di-n-butyl phthalate
Compositional
(ug/kg)

38,000
20,000
46
2,000
12
32
120
42
2,300
1,200,000
2,500
27
380
320
1,900
410,000

40,000
29,000
23,000
24 , 000
180,000
55,000
120,000
160,000
TCLP Extract
(jig/L)
-
8,800
<3,300
<1,700
<3,300
< 1 , 700
<1,700
< 1,700
< 1 , 700
<3,300
48,000
11,000
<1,700
< 1 , 700
<1,700
< 1 , 700
M.M.

< 1,400
<200
< 1 , 000
310
1,300
370
410
<200
Regulatory
Level
(yg/L)

8,600
None
70
7 , 200
30,000
None
70
70
None
100
14,400
1 ,400
None
None
None
None

14,400
130
None
None
None
None
None
None
*Analysis of a single composite sample.  	,                 -
 composite were collected every two hours during the incineration run.
                                        -270-

-------
                Table  3.   Facility  A  Ash  Analytical Data* - Metals
PARAMETER
Compositional
(mg/kg)
TCLP Extract
(mg/L)
EP Toxicity
Extract
(mg/L)
Regulatory
Level
(mg/L)
Toxic Metals
 Antimony
 Arsenic
 Barium
 Beryllium
 Cadmium
 Hexavalent Chromium
 Total Chromium
 Copper
 Lead
 Mercury
 Nickel
 Selenium
 Silver
 Thallium
 Zinc

Other Analyses

Total solids (mg/kg)
Specific gravity (g/mL)
Paint Filter Test
    8,0
   42,0
    150
   <0.2
    2.0
  0.083
   71.0
 13,800
   30.0
    0.2
    190
   <1.0
    0.4
    2.0
    280
599,300
 1.2809
   PASS
  0.094
  0.062
  0.026
 <0,005
   0.02
     NM
   0.01
  0.729
  <0.05
0.00025
   1.14
 <0.001
 <0.005
 <0.001
   1.15
 0.2
<1.0
<0.2
<0.5
  NM
<0.3
 4.0
 2.0
<1.0
<0.2
<1.0
 0.3
  None
   5.0
100.0
  None
   1.0
  None
   5.0
  None
   5.0
   0.2
  None
   1.0
   5.0
  None
  None
*Analysis of a single composite sample.Aliquots of ash making up the composite
 were collected every two hours during the incineration run.
                                      -271-

-------

















40
f
C
0)
E
JO
03
,
"c
n
In

rr
a

j;

H







































































40
O
n)
) LI
jj
X
w
•° ;>,
JJ
' a
i X
1 O
1
a a.
w
(!)
00
T)
3
CO
•a
0)
L,
0)
jj

^
0)
o


JJ
c
d)
3
d
 8
CO V N/ ^




a
V.
UC
5 0> § 0) C 0) • "^ "Sdjltf
Hl-S §£§— ^ rH^rti. 	 i i-* "
I- f\ "^ c~* L .O I O fl) flj *"• C ^} ttJ "^ •*-* •*-*
A tj t=S>>?Sm (-VI51 NK1 -H (UjSC'HD.Xl'H
° n% eSSSn 10 CC 40 N4O(UC O.>>
2 ^mcT-2 ^4^ fem rH 0) e>* 5 S § -S •=>• a C B _o> ^

o ^^g-g^T^T^^-j.^S'S'cijwx'E co euist\rcc^-a-OT3
-272-

-------
















n
4-
cd
Q

c
(1
a
CU
i.

I*
fr

a.
s
a
V
3
J_^
a;
XI
X
c
CO
•=&

4-5
rH
•H
o
cd



73
(U

4J
c
o
o


.j!

0)
i-H
X!
cd














































































o
cu cd
60 't,
73 4^
3 £4
rH Cd
CO
'S.H?
s- o
CO -H
4-5 X
cd o
3 E-H
cu
a a,
Cd


CO
60
73
3
CO
73
CO
£4
0)
4-5
cd
3
CU
Q


c
CO
3
clj
Cu
Cd

73
0)
cu
rH
•H


SL,
s
tf
>2
D ^-,
n c
cd cd
3 E-<
5 a.
XI — '
XI
3
3
CO











RAMETER
•=fi
Cu






O «, O CVJ LO CO Q O < — CO O C\J O i.-.
••- o''- OOSO^'-OO^O'-Q ' ' ' ' ' '
\X NX NX












*— -=3" co •oomoo^oo • • • o o s s cvi s co
co <— <— o .=t- • co vo CM •— o co *- .=r cr\ co
NX o CO *- CM NX CO - CM -
NX 0 • C-
in '-co









co.
°. incjrvj.u?'ocy?oco^;t-0. C^OCD £2. jg! S £?; ™ ij
*~~ f~i * — ^^ ^^ r""t ^^ i o - C^ * — ^^ T— . * •* *. ^* ^^ ^*
V V XX NX V V^VVV IgLg _'










o vo °. ^ c- [n ^- °. o ^ o °. ^ °. o S S ° S "^ §
^ °' v S °' P "~ ^ "^ S =•• v S v c°' vo" oT^° °- ^
CO CO »-




uJ uJ
60 60 CO
E E 0

cd
to co o
T3 73
•rH -H to
^ E -— rH rH Cd
i-J 3 J O O
^ 'E ' ^  6O
•— J-.E IO---Q)CI)-HE
x: 3 CD > 73 >
K> O-H tOCOrHCCd----
•-J E > 73 O CO £-.
Cd _-*iP rH-rHtOCXO>,
4-» ECt. CdrHtOt04J
^ £>,, ^-^-C EE C O-H3O -H
s o-HErni1"1 ^5 3 "* cooco-rH c
CJ EC3rH—f>rH(l) 30>CCl)rH Ll tHrHrH-rH ,H
•H •rHO).H>,EcdCdQ.73O^l!(U>rHO 0) CtfCdCdO Cd
O CLCdCDCdCUOOCUCJ -H. CP-HXI'rH 4J OOOCU^CrH
E~< 
3
CO
cd

1 •
•H C
X! 0
•H
C 4->
•H cd
c
73 -H
73 C E
0) 3 cd
Si O 4->
to o
cd co a
CU 4J
E ^s -ZyS
rH C
4-5 Cd Cd
O C -H
C =C XI
II II
S CO
-273-

-------
filtered effluent are less than those of
the scrubber wastewater.

     No information is available on
Facility A's discharge permit to the local
POTW.  However, strictly for purposes of
comparison, Table 5 presents filtered
effluent data for five metals along with
the daily maximum concentrations of metals
permitted to be discharged to publicly
owned treatment works (POTWs) by metal
finishing operations (Effluent Guidelines
for Metal Finishing.  Amended September,
1981).  Facility A's effluent exceeds the
metal finishing effluent guidelines
concentrations for copper, lead and zinc.

     The dewatered sludge from scrubber
wastewater treatment was about 45 percent
total solids by weight.  Metals
concentrations in the sludge were greater
than 1000 ppm for copper, lead, nickel and
zinc.  An EP Toxicity test was done on
this sludge.  None of the metals exceeded
regulatory levels in the extract.

FACILITY B

Facility Description

     Facility B is a chemical
manufacturing plant owned and operated by
a major chemical company. Both solid and
liquid hazardous organic wastes generated
at Facility B and at several of the
company's other plants  are incinerated at
Facility B.

     Solid wastes and sludges are received
in drums and typically  include paint
sludges, chlorinated hydrocarbons, coke
solids, vacuum filter solids, waste filter
elements and polymeric  tar.

     Liquid wastes are  transported by
tanker truck and are transferred on site
to one of  four 20,000 gallon waste storage
tanks. One  is used as a feed tank, another
as a waste  blending  tank, and the
remaining  two as holding tanks. Liquid
wastes commonly  include waste organic
solutions,  waste solvents, tank farm
nitriles and chloroprene catalyst sludge.
     The incineration system (Figure 3) at
Facility B includes both a rotary kiln
incinerator and a single-stage liquid
injection incinerator. The total system
thermal- input rating is 40 million BTU/hr.
Both the incinerators use natural gas as
auxiliary fuel. The liquid injection
incinerator burns only liquid wastes,
which are predominantly generated from the
manufacturing operations on site. Ash  is
removed about four times per year from the
liquid injection incinerator. The rotary
kiln incinerator will typically burn the
same liquid wastes, in addition to a
variety of solid wastes.

     Solid wastes are all contained in
drums. The drums are fed to the kiln by an
automated feed system. First the drum  top
is removed, and the drum is lifted
vertically up an elevator. It is then
transported horizontally  across a
conveyor. The drum then enters an airlock
before being inverted and the contents
dumped into the rotary kiln. Empty drums
are returned down the elevator and placed
in storage. If the drums must be cleaned
they are washed with toluene or water  and
set out to dry. The toluene and water
wastes are also incinerated.

     The rotary kiln  is followed by a
natural gas-fired afterburner designed to
further burn gases exiting the kiln.
Normal operating temperatures for the
rotary kiln are 1200-1400°C. Afterburner
temperatures for the  rotary kiln are  100-
150°C higher than the kiln. Average solid
residence  times in the  kiln are between 40
and 60 minutes, and the kiln rotation  is
between 0.10 and 0.20 revolutions per
minute. Ash is discharged continuously
from  the kiln  to an ash sluice.

      Liquid wastes, as  described
previously, are stored  in four  (20,000
gallon) tanks. These  tanks are
recirculated by pumps to mix  the  tank
contents.  It normally takes  2 to  3  days  to
burn  the contents of  one  tank.
                                           -274-

-------
                                                'es


                                                2
                                                •3


                                                o
                                                O)


                                                2
                                                a.

                                                CO
                                                cfi

                                                £
-275-

-------
                     TABLE 5.  FACILITY A EFFLUENT METALS
Metal
   Filtered
Effluent (mg/L)
     Metal Finishing
Effluent Guidelines (mg/L)
Copper
Nickel
Lead
Chromium
Zinc
     5.0
     1.7
     1.3
    <0.3
     5.0
      3.38
      3.98
      0.69
      2.77
      2.61
                                       -276-

-------
     The liquid incinerator is air
atomized and care must be taken to prevent
plugging  of the feed lines. Tanks and
feed lines are flushed with toluene
between burning incompatible liquid
wastes. Normal operating temperatures for
the liquid incinerator ranges from 1400 to
1600°C.

     Each of the two incinerators is
followed by a water quench and a cyclone.
The quench serves to cool effluent gases.
The cyclone acts to remove entrained
particulates and droplets prior to
scrubbing the exhaust gases.

     Gases exiting the two cyclones
combine to form a single exhaust stream.
The combined gas stream then passes
through a three-stage packed tower
absorption (scrubber) system for removal
of particulates and HC1.

     There are two waste streams generated
by this incineration facility: scrubber
wastewater and ash residue. A portion of
the scrubber blowdown (about 10-12,000
gal/hr) is neutralized and processed at an
on-site wastewater treatment facility
prior to deep well injection.  Ash residue
is typically allowed to accumulate in the
ash sluice and slurry tank for about four
weeks.  The rotary kiln is shut down
approximately once a month for ash
removal. Ash is landfilled on-site.

Waste Characterization

     During a week-long sampling period,
Facility B incinerated the contents of one
20,000 gallon liquid blend tank along with-
183 drums representing five different
types of solid waste.  The solid waste
types were:  (1) chlorinated hydrocarbon
coke from dlchlorobutene synthesis,
(2) polymeric tar,  (3) filtered organo-
metallic waste solids from adiponitrile
area,  (4) adiponitrile spent filter
cartridges, and (5) scrap paint solids.
Analytical data summarizing the chemical
and physical characteristics of each waste
are presented in Table 6.
     Toluene is the major volatile  organic
component"of the waste.  Several
semivolatile compounds were  reported  in
one or more of the waste samples.   Copper
and, nickel are the two metals present at
highest concentrations in the liquid  waste
and they are reported at significant
levels in each of the solid  wastes  as
well.  Solid waste #5, the scrap paint
solids, exhibits the highest metals
concentration with high levels of lead,
chromium and zinc, three common pigment
metals.

     The liquid waste blend  had a water
content of about 17 percent,:an organic
halide content of 14.24 percent and a fuel
value of 11,926 BTU/lb.  The fuel value of
the solid wastes ranged from 5,866  BTU/lb
for the polymeric tar to 12,000 BTU/lb for
the scrap paint solids.

Residue Characterization

     No volatile or semivolatile organic
compounds were found in the  ash from
Facility B.  This ash had a  total solids
content of about 81 weight percent  and a
specific gravity o'f about 1.94.  The  ash
contained nearly 18 weight percent
silica.  Measurable concentrations  of
eight toxic metals were reported, with
copper (4,600 mg/kg), nickel (4,200 mg/kg)
and zinc (1,160 mg/kg) being present  at
the highest concentrations.  Although none
of the regulated TCLP metals were found
above regulatory level in the TCLP
extract, extract levels of copper,  nickel
and zinc were quite high.

     Facility B's scrubber wastewater • is
very acidic, wi-th pH <1.   Four toxic
metals - copper,  lead, nickel and zinc -
are present at concentrations greater than
25 mg/L.  No volatile or semivolatile
organic compounds were found in the
scrubber wastewater.
                                           -277-

-------


















*
§
*H
03
a

t_
CO
JJ
O
n)
i.
 o ro c— ON o
C— C— O O T— C— O
fO ;=r O CO CO =»• «-
O «~ NX
o"
ro <-^
Q
a
XI CU
Q C CO
Q O O

"^ (fl Z
CO JJ > J

r | o CO CO i~H Q) C t ^ ^>
J t. C rH S: >>rH E S
O,i u
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
t— t— C— Ot—C— t— CMC—
CM







anaanaooci
S2SSS3OSS
o
*.
3;
OO
""


ooooooooo
ooooooooo
OOOOOC— OOO
oc— c— oooooo
ON in CT» CT* O C — CT* ON CT*
»— m^r ^r ON »— «— ^—
NX *• NX NX NX
CM







ooooooooo
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
VO VO VO VO VO VO VO VO vO






ooooooooo
ooooooooo
C^- ^~ C"^~ C~~ C^- C"~ C— t— C^-




ooooooooo
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
Ot— OOOOOOOO
ovoooinininininin
^"^.^
«— *- OO



CO CO
C 4J
•rH 0) Cd
Q) E CO 4J rH
C CO C a) cd — -
CU rH CO rH X! E
N >, rH Cd 4J Q
c c cd s: ^: a
rH CO CO X! 4J O. -— '
o xi x: 4J si
£ O Q. S2 CO Q-rH1 CO
OOT3Cn)CO rHN <=£
rHrHOCUCX: r»>C EH
>x: 3 xi S
rH-rH L.X:XI CUrHXI
>,-a 40 4-> -P cd o i rH o
l^fffll Z t g
03 «— C C CM cd CXT3 XI E-"
CM *- CT> CM Ln in
«— 'CM • -CO
0 000
^ \/ \s •
o








<- «- in CM in in
o a- o o o
NX NX NX •
o




vo »— »— CM on i— i
«— CM CM • -CO
,- . o «-
O NX










a- •r- T- CM in vo
i NX • 'CM
o o o •







*—*—<— CM in ON
NX • NX • • O
o o o •
\S V V





T— *— t— c\j in oo
\s • \x • • OJ
o o o •










J_J
c
CU
t-H
cd
^
cd
» S O
C i-i cd o cd .C
cc 
-------



















*
c
o
Jj

M
_J
*r|
rti
• ^
o
2
r*
O
40
Cd
UJ
*^
C3


.5
"tj
"'":
•.-1
O
Cti
Ei-t


^^
•a
QJ

?•
C
*""^
r*
0
^
*^^
.
^0
0)
*o
£

























































































































in


•a
•H
rH
o
CO


^f
s»fc

•a
•rH
rH
£





m
:**-

•a
•rH
rH
0
co




CM
=«(=

•a
. -H
rH
O
CO






,_
=«=

•a
•rH
rH
3






T3
3
cr
•H
,_]

























40
C
•H
cd co
a, -a
•rH
O.-H
cd o
t. CO

CO
CO CO
40 CO
rH 60
•H -a
[*Tj •!— (
£-.

C £-


O 0)
C 40
fl) CO
bO cd
£-3
O vo men -vo
CTv O • in • vO • 1 • " — VO CO
C~-J3- O • O «— O «— O~> ON • C— 1 in • CM -
vo t— on co in ^ ^* ^ *~~ CM vo CM i *— *^ ^^ in







CM CM CO a-
m <— CM «— o in a- m -a-
CO • CM • O • t — ^" 1 -=3~ CM CT> CTv
• in >— o • *— o >— • cn-'i ••in-










o
CO O
o o <- =r vo co
O ' — CM O ' — CTN C — in —a~
•r-t-- • -co • vo • i c— o in CM
. -.— o <— «— o <— • co-cni ..vo-
CM in .=3- o in


vO O vO
vo vO ^3- <— C— O CM
<— CM c^vo «— CM O in o cr.
CM C— • t— -CO ..Z3-...CT.--
•CO • O CM »— O »- • a- • t— 3- O -OO-—
CM vO < — N/ CM N/" "^ v -=t~ In CO ' — * — v O t — « —







^— ^
bO
, "O
1 J C 60 --H CB 40 .-I
•=E OOL.CO-rHr-1
E E E 2Xis-cocd'H>o
3 >>33 S Cd S- •«-< 2- Xt

O O. *O CJ *v^ CO ^ ' — i O Cd Cd *^
£-,cxcd£-OrH.— icdc X «e.^s.^a.^s.s«. -403
X:OCOCO'HCO'rHX:-H E-i 4040404040Q.OE-1
CJO-JSZCO'/lf-cJ O 33333COE-ICQ











































•
co
CO
rH
Q.
E
cd
CO
X!
, fd

60

CO
£
x:
40

0
CO
60
cd
^,
C8

CO
x:
40
CO
40
CO CO C
O rH CO
c a. co
CO E CO
s-. cd t.
CO CO Q.
OH CO
2_j 4_J j_,
CO C
40 CO CO
C -r-l 3
PH O rH
— 1 Cd
CO Ci_i >
'3. 3 x:
E 03 0
cd c cd
CO r-H Cd
II II
1— I CO
CO — *
-279-

-------
               Table 7.   Facility B Ash Analytical Data * - Metals
PARAMATER
TOXIC METALS
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Hexavalent Chromium
Total Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
OTHER ANALYSES
Silica (WT56)
Total Solids (mg/kg)
Specific Gravity
Compositional
(mg/kg)

14.5
<0.1
75
<0.2

-------
          Table 8.   Facility B  Scrubber Wastewater Data*
        PARAMETER
Scrubber Wastewater
Toxic Metals (mg/kg)

Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium-hex
Chromium-total
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc

Other Analyses

Total Solids (mg/kg)
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/kg)
Total Suspended Solids (mg/kg)
Total Organic Halide (wtf,)
Total Chlorine (wt$)
Specific Gravity (g/mL)
PH
         <0
         <0
          0
          1
          241
          106

           27

         <0.2

          363
         3867
         3500
           67
         0.08
         1.59
       0.9936
          0.7
*Each value represents the average of 3 grab samples.
                                -231-

-------
CONCLUSIONS

     Because of the limited sampling
periods, the data presented in this paper
represents only a snapshot of operations
at two hazardous waste incineration
facilities.  It is not known whether this
data is typical of normal operation at
each of these facilities or of
incineration in general.

     However, evaluation of the limited
data does indicate that significant levels
of toxic metals are present in waste
solvents and organic process wastes.
Since metals are not destroyed by
incineration, they tend to concentrate in
the treatment residues - ash and scrubber
wastewater.  Properly designed and
operated incineration systems should
achieve virtually complete destruction of
organic compounds.  This appears to be the
case at Facility B, where no detectable
levels of volatile or semivolatile
organics were found in either the ash or
scrubber wastewater.  Facility A's ash did
contain significant concentrations of
organic compounds.  This may be indicative
of incomplete combustion due to inadequate
detention time, mixing, or temperature in
the incinerator.
                                           -282-

-------
                      WASTE CHARACTERIZATION AND THE GENERATION OF
                 TRANSIENT PUFFS IN A ROTARY KILN INCINERATOR SIMULATOR

                          William P. Linak, Joseph A. McSorley
                     Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
                          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                           Research Triangle Park, NC  27711

                                    Jost 0. L. Wendt
                                 University of Arizona                         '
                                   Tucson, AZ  85721

                                     James E. Dunn
                                 University of Arkansas
                                Fayetteville, AR  72701

                                        ABSTRACT

     The batch introduction of waste-filled drums or containers into rotary kiln  incin-
erators can lead to transient overcharging conditions, which are denoted as "puffs." This
paper describes results of an in-house investigation at the U.S. EPA into the waste prop-
erties and kiln parameters that determine both the intensity and the magnitude of transi-
ent puffs leaving the kiln.  The experimental apparatus utilized was a 73 kW (250,000
Btu/hr) laboratory rotary kiln simulator.  Surrogate solid wastes in the form of  plastic
rods and surrogate liquid wastes on corncob sorbent in cardboard containers were  investi-
gated.  Parametric studies were used to determine the extent to which waste and kiln
variables (such as charge mass, charge surface area, charge composition, kiln temperature,
and kiln rotation speed) affected the intensity (peak hydrocarbon emission) and magnitude
(time-integrated hydrocarbon emission) of puffs.

     Results demonstrate the relative ease with which failure conditions are achieved,
even at high excess air values and high kiln temperatures.   Chemical analysis indicates
that puffs arising from even innocuous surrogate wastes can contain numerous hazardous
compounds even though adequate DREs (>99.99%) are achieved.  Increasing kiln temperature
and rotation speed can adversely affect puff intensity, due to increased devolatilization
and liquid evaporation rates.   There are large effects of waste composition and,  for
solid wastes, waste surface area is a critical  variable.

     Stoichiometric oxygen requirement is an important variable distinguishing the trans-
ient behavior of different kinds of wastes.  Thermogravimetric analyses may be useful in
characterizing the propensity  of solids to generate transient puffs, while liquid wastes
may be best characterized by their normal boiling points  and latent heats.
INTRODUCTION

     Rotary kiln incinerator systems have
been described elsewhere (1,2) and may
comprise one of the most versatile waste
disposal systems available.  Available
data (1,3) indicate that these systems
are generally safe and effective.   How-
ever, most data on destruction and removal
efficiencies (DREs) of many principal  or-
ganic hazardous constituents (POHCs) have
been obtained under steady-state operating
conditions.  Little information is avail-
able on potential  problems during transi-
ent conditions that occur when drummed
liquids or solid materials are batch fed
into the combustion chamber.  Overcharging
conditions can occur if waste parameters
                                           -283-

-------
are not properly matched to the incinera-
tor operating conditions.  They can lead
to heavy loadings of products of incom-
plete combustion (PICs) in the afterburner
and gas cleanup systems.  For the sake of
brevity, we denote this transient condi-
tion as a "puff."

     The overall objectives of the current
research are to gain engineering insight
Into potential problem areas related to
rotary kiln incineration, with a view to
developing predictive methods that corre-
late possible failure modes to waste
characteristics and kiln operating parame-
ters using continuous on-line instrumenta-
tion.  The specific problem addressed in
this paper is that of transient puffs
originating from the batch introduction
of either solids or liquids on sorbent in
containers.

     The problem is approached through
parametric experimentation on a laboratory-
scale rotary kiln incinerator simulator.
The value 1n utilizing a prototype kiln,
rather than an actual permitted field
device, lies in its ability to allow para-
metric variation, in a controlled fashion,
without loss of the overall complicated
salient features of practical kiln opera-
tion.

     It is hypothesized that a waste param-
eter of direct importance in the genera-
tion of transient puffs is the volatility,
or the rate of volatile release, of the
waste.  When devolatilization occurs
rapidly, local oxygen concentrations in
the flue gas are almost totally depleted
or displaced by the volatilized waste
species.  A transient puff then moves as
a plug through the system.  When volatiles
are released slowly, however, they are
transferred into the flue gas stream with-
out totally depleting the local oxygen
levels, allowing more complete oxidation
to occur and puffs to be minimized.
Therefore, the  research  results presented
here focus primarily on the effects caused
by differences  in waste  volatility.  Spe-
cifically, we compare results from the
batch  introduction of surrogate solid
wastes, in the  form of plastic rods, to
those  resulting from contained surrogate
liquid/sorbent  wastes.
LABORATORY ROTARY KILN SIMULATOR

     The EPA laboratory-scale rotary kiln
simulator was designed to contain the
salient features of full-scale kilns, but
to remain sufficiently versatile to allow
parametric experimentation by varying one
parameter at a time, or by controlling a
set of parameters independently.  A sche-
matic view of the simulator is shown on
Figure 1.  Its overall characteristics,
compared to those of full-scale units,
and a detailed description of the hard-
ware specifications have been previously
presented (4).  The simulator consists of
five refractory-lined sections, and is
rated at 73 kW (250,000 Btu/hr).  The sim-
ulator matches the volumetric heat release
and gas-phase residence times of full-
scale units, but is rated at less than 5
percent of the gross heat input of full-
scale units (5).

     Surrogate waste.materials are batch
charged through a sliding gate/ram assem-
bly located on the transition/afterburner
section (Figure 1).  Quantification of a
system upset condition (puff) requires the
real-time measurement of system variables.
Peak responses of fixed gas and hydrocar-
bon analyzers indicate extremes.  Other
useful variables include time-integrated
responses; in particular, the time-
integrated response of the total volatile
hydrocarbon analyzer.  This method permits
determination of emitted mass.  By holding
constant sampling temperature, pressure,
and flow rate, a constant volumetric flow
is delivered to the analyzer's flame ioni-
zation detector (FID).  Provided the
incinerator flue gas flow rate is constant
and the gases well mixed, the integrated
mass measured is then proportional to the
total mass of volatile hydrocarbons pass-
ing up the stack during a puff.  The peak
response, on the other hand, represents
the maximum concentration in a puff.  The
FID is very sensitive to hydrocarbon
species but less sensitive to chlorinated
compounds.

     This paper is concerned only with
phenomena occurring in the kiln (primary
combustion chamber), so samples withdrawn
represent effluent leaving the kiln and
entering the afterburner (secondary com-
bustion chamber).  Throughout this work,
there was neither supplemental heating
nor afterburning downstream of the kiln
exit.  Samples were withdrawn at sample
                                           -284-

-------
 port  4 (Figures  1 and 2).   Linak et al.
 (4) have discussed the extractive sampling
 and analysis  procedures.   The results
 allow determination of the inlet transient
 conditions  with  which an afterburner must
 be capable  of dealing, and how these de-
 pend  on  kiln  and waste parameters.
                  TO SLOWER AND STACK
                            BACKFIRE EXHAUST
                                 • •THERMOCOUPLE
                                )    ^-flAMHOO


                                 CHARGING BASKET
  ROTARY LEAF
  WRINOSIAI.
                          ITRANSmON/AFTEflaURNER)
              ft 0  1   2  3

Figure 1.  EPA rotary kiln incinerator
           simulator.

     Figure 2 shows the axial time/
temperature profile through the kiln and
the subsequent control temperature tower
(without additional heat addition) under
the low and high firing conditions uti-
lized in the parametric experiments
reported in later sections.  Gas phase
kiln temperatures range from 1258 K
(1804 °F) to 1056 K (1440 °F) after 3.6
seconds, and from 1383 K (2030 °F) to
1327 K (1928 °F) after 3.1 seconds under
low and high firing conditions, respec-
tively.  These gaseous time/temperature
profiles simulate full-scale units well.
                                                                      6      8
                                                                  RESIDENCE TIME.*
                                                Figure 2.   Temperature profile vs resi-
                                                           dence time, low and high fire
                                                           test conditions
 PARAMETRIC  STUDIES

 Statistical  Design of  Experiments

      Experimentation was  divided into two
 phases:   Phase  1 was concerned with  well
 defined prototype  solid plastic  wastes;
 and Phase 2  dealt  with liquids absorbed
 on corncob  sorbent in  cardboard  con-
 tainers.  In both  experimental phases,
 the general  methodology employed was that
 of response  surface experimentation  (6).
 This  methodology allows one to determine,
 on the basis of one experiment involving
 a minimal number of trials, an empirical
 relationship between the  response and the
 controlled parameters in  the experimental
 region.

      For  both phases of experimentation,
 low,  intermediate, and high settings  of
 the variables to be investigated were
 determined.  For Phase 1, dealing with
 prototype solid plastic wastes,  these
 variables were charge mass, charge sur-
 face  area, and kiln temperature.  For
 Phase 2, which was treated separately and
 concerned with contained  liquid  on sorbent
wastes, these variables were charge mass,
 kiln temperature,  and kiln rotation  speed.

     Each phase involved  four waste  com-
 positions and consisted of at least  24
trials.  This allowed quadratic models to
be formulated as well as  full degree  of
                                           -285-

-------
freedom tests of significance of all  main
effects and all two-factor interactions
(6).  Each trial involved between 5 and
15 replicates, depending on the response
variance and the availability of waste
material.  Replicate values of the re-
sponse variables, including FID measure-
ments of time-resolved total hydrocarbon
peak area, and peak height, were averaged.
A quadratic response surface model was
fitted to these mean values using weighted
least squares.

     The quadratic model included linear
and quadratic dependencies on each inde-
pendent variable, as well as all the
cross-product terms denoting interactions
between pairs of variables.  The prepro-
grammed procedures in SAS (Statistical
Analysis System), which are relevant to
response surface methodology, were used
further to interpret the data.  Similari-
ties in model coefficients between differ-
ent wastes (within one phase of experimen-
tation) were statistically tested for
evidence that dependencies of the response
on various parameters altered from waste
to waste.  Further tests denoted which
linear, quadratic, or interaction depen-
dencies were statistically significant.

Phase 1; Prototype Solid Plastic Wastes

     Plastic rods composed of low density
polyethylene (LDPE), high density poly-
ethylene (HOPE), polystyrene (PS), and
polyvinylchloride (PVC) were chosen as
prototype plastic wastes.  These rods had
well defined initial shapes and allowed,
within a certain range, for surface area
and mass to be varied independently by
varying rod diameters.  The plastics span
a range of molecular structures, molecular
weights, and elemental compositions that
are of intrinsic interest to the inciner-
ation community because they are widely
used and disposed of.  In addition to com-
position, the other independent variables
included kiln temperature, charge mass,
and charge surface area.  The representa-
tive kiln temperature used as a control
parameter was that measured by a bare
type K thermocouple at the kiln exit,
0.97 m (38 in.) from the front burner
wall.  Low and high fire conditions were
used and correspond to the two temperature
distributions in Figure 2.  The following
represent the minimum and maximum values
for the parametric test matrix:
(a)  Kiln exit temperature,  1105  K  (1530°F)
     minimum,  1339 K (1950 °F)  maximum.
     High fire conditions  were  obtained  by
     making use of the thermal  inertia of
     the kiln  to heat the  flue  gas  to a
     temperature greater than that  occur-
     ring naturally at a stoichiometric
     ratio (SR) of 2.0, as shown  in Figure
     2.
(b)  Charge surface area,  0.050 m2  (78 -
     in.2) minimum, 0.095  m2 (147 in.2)
     maximum.
(c)  Charge mass, 75-100 g (0.17-0.22 Ib)
     (minimum), 500-750 g  (1.10-1.65 Ib)
     (maximum).  Charge mass was  deter-
     mined by  the mass of  6.35, 12.7, and
     25.4 mm (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0  in.)
     diameter  rods which produced the
     proper charge surface area,  and was
     dependent on waste density.

     The following kiln operating parame-
ters were kept constant for all runs
reported here:

(a)  Auxiliary gas flow rate, 5.66  m3/hr
     (200 cfh).
(b)  Air flow  rate, 109.0  m3/hr (3850 cfh)
     (leading  to constant  SR of 2.0 or
     excess air of 100 percent).
(c)  Rotation  speed, 1 rpm.
(d)  Burner position, -0.34 m  (-13.5 in.)
     inside front burner wall.
(e)  Kiln pressure, -37.4  Pa (-0.15 in.
     H20).
(f)  Sample port, at position 4 (See
     Figures 1 and 2).

     The area under the transient curve
measured by flame ionization detection
(FID) is, under constant sampling condi-
tions, proportional to the total  quantity
of volatile hydrocarbon in a puff.   Peak
height, on the other hand, represents the
instantaneous volatile hydrocarbon  concen-
trations in the puff.  The volatile hydro-
carbons are defined as those sampled at
420 K  (300 °F) and analyzed by  continuous
FID.  Figure 3 shows typical traces for
two different plastics at  similar test
conditions.  Clearly there are  significant
quantitative and qualitative variations
in the mechanisms generating transient
puffs from solid wastes of differing com-
positions.

     Quadratic models were fitted to the
data, using weighted least squares  where
the weights were equal to the  number of
                                           -286-

-------
      1000
      800
      600
      400
      200
               I       I

           (a) LOPE
            307.6 g (0.678 Ib)
          0.0547 m2 (84.8 in.2)
            1360 K( 1988 °F)
                                   50
                                   40
                                   30
                                   20
                                   10
                                I       I
                            (b) PVC
                          -  442.2 g (0.975 Ib)
                           0.0538m2 (83.4 in.2)
                             1339 K (1950 <>F)
              0.5
                     1.0
                           1.5
                                 2.0 0
                                          0.5
                                                 1.0
                                                        1.5
                                                              2.0
                                                                     2.5
                                                                            3.0
                                                                                   3.5
                                            TIME, min
Figure 3.
Comparison of LDPE and PVC transient hydrocarbon  peak  shapes
at similar trial conditions.
replicates.  These models, obtained using
the preprogrammed procedures in SAS,
should not be considered unique, since
other models might attain fits essentially
indentical to those reported here.  Once
determined, these models can be described
pictorially through response surface
plots.  These contour plots have been pre-
sented previously (4) and are not included
here.

     The final models for peak area ac-
counted for 95.9 percent of the variation
in the reponse caused by changes in the
controlled variable.  The data indicate
that, for LDPE, the largest puffs (mass
basis) occur at large surface areas and
high charge masses.  There exists a thres-
hold charge mass, above which puffs rapid-
ly appear, and this threshold is not sen-
sitive to kiln temperature.  For LDPE,
charge surface area is important and,
within a certain charge mass range, can
also determine the presence and magnitude
of a puff.  Increasing kiln temperature
decreases the total volatile hydrocarbon
species contained in a puff.  This sig-
nificant result was also true for the
HOPE, PS, and PVC wastes.  PS and PVC
wastes, however, showed little effect of
surface area on the integrated traces.
                                    Data for maximum peak heights,  represent-
                                    ing the maximum instantaneous intensity
                                    of the puff, were analyzed  statistically
                                    using the same procedures.  The  resulting
                                    quadratic model accounted for 84.3  per-
                                    cent of the variability of  the 37 averaged
                                    data points used and is significantly  dif-
                                    ferent from the model for peak area.   This
                                    demonstrates the importance of distinguish-
                                    ing between total mass of the puff  and
                                    the peak transient concentration.   The
                                    resulting contour plots for LDPE yield
                                    the important result that increasing the
                                    kiln temperature increases  the maximum •
                                    instantaneous concentration of volatile
                                    hydrocarbons emitted, which is contrary
                                    to the school of thought that destruction
                                    efficiencies necessarily increase with
                                    temperature.  Charge surface area is very
                                    significant at lower kiln temperature,
                                    but less so at higher kiln  temperatures.
                                    PS arid PVC peak heights showed strong
                                    surface area effects, but the role  of  kiln
                                    temperature was more ambiguous.  For the
                                    PVC waste, peak heights were very much
                                    smaller, and peak durations very much
                                    longer than those for the HOPE and  LDPE
                                    wastes at similar test conditions (see
                                    Figure 3).
                                           -287-

-------
     It 1s likely that the formation of
puffs from solid plastic wastes is gov-
erned by a number of related chemical  and
physical processes.  The stoichiometric
oxygen requirement of the plastic waste
being incinerated is the most important
parameter distinguishing the behavior of
different waste compositions.  High kiln
temperatures enhance rapid devolatiliza-
tion of the solids, thus increasing the
rate of formation of volatile gases to
displace or deplete the excess oxygen
from the main burner.  This may explain
the significant effect of kiln temperature
on the maximum instantaneous concentration
of hydrocarbons in the puff (peak height).
It is interesting to note, however, that
Increasing kiln temperature decreased the
total mass of volatile hydrocarbons emitted
(peak area).  This points to the benefi-
cial (and not unexpected) effects of high
temperatures to enhance oxidation mecha-
nisms.  Clearly, definition of an optimum
condition is not trivial.  In practice,
afterburners must be able to handle large
Instantaneous pulses of wastes from the
kiln, and so the peak height results are
of practical significance.

     That surface area appears to be an
important parameter, under several condi-
tions,  indicates the importance of physi-
cal  processes,  such  as heat  transfer to
the  solid and devolatilization from the
surface.  Decreasing surface area  of the
solid usually decreased  both the  intensity
of the  puff  and the  total  volatile  hydro-
carbon  mass  emitted.  The  exceptions to
this occurred at high kiln temperature
when heat transfer and subsequent  devol-
atilization  are both more  rapid.

      Heat transfer is clearly  not  the  only
 important mechanism, since there  were
vast differences in  behavior between waste
types.   PVC  rods had the slowest  rate  of
 volatile release,  for all  surface areas,
and therefore  always formed the least
 intense, but longest,  puffs.  It  is ex-
 pected that  their effluent could  be
 handled best by an afterburner.   The PE
wastes had  the most rapid rate of vola-
 tile release,  and thus  are most likely to
 cause difficulties in the downstream
 afterburner.  This was  evident also from
 thermogravimetric analyses of the solids.
 These "devolatilization profiles" indicate
 that, while PVC begins  to lose mass at a
 lower temperature as compared to both LDPE
 and HOPE, the mass loss rate is slower.
Programmed at a temperature ramp of 30
K/min (56 °F/min) in a nitrogen atmos-
phere, the PVC begins to lose mass  at
approximately 525 K (486 °F) and is still
losing mass at 1175 K (1656 °F).  Both
LDPE and HOPE, under the same conditions,
begin losing mass rapidly at approximately
675 K (756 °F), and essentially all mass
is lost by 750 K (891 °F).  Clearly, vol-
atile release rates are significant in
characterizing the propensity of solid
wastes to form transient puffs.  The PE
wastes had the most rapid rate of vola-
tile release, and thus are most likely
to cause difficulties in the downstream
afterburner.

Phase 2: Liquid/Sorbent Wastes

     In practice, when liquids are incin-
erated in a  batch mode, they are usually
held on sorbents in containers or drums;
In the research  reported here, the con-
tainers consisted of 0.947 1  (1 qt)
closed, cylindrical cardboard  vessels,
with 135 g  (0.298 Ib) of shredded agri-
cultural corncob as the sorbent.   Proto-
type liquid  wastes  included toluene, No.
5  fuel oil,  carbon  tetrachloride,  and
methylene chloride.  These compounds were
chosen because  they spanned  a  range  of
volatility  (the fuel oil,  for  example,
required  heating before  being  absorbed  on
the  sorbent),  chemical structure,  stoi-
chiometric  oxygen  requirement, and chlo-
rine substitution.

      The  experimental  design was identical
to that used for the  prototype solid
wastes  (Phase 1),  except  that  the  variable
denoting  the solid  plastic surface areas
was replaced by kiln  rotation  speed.   Ro-
tation  speed was chosen  because, like
surface area for a  solid,  it  directly
influences  contacting  between  waste/
sorbent  and the surroundings.   The follow-
 ing represent the  minimum and maximum
values  for the parametric test matrix:

 (a)  Kiln exit temperature,  1105 K (1530°F)
      minimum, 1339  K (1950 °F) maximum.
 (b)  Kiln rotation speed, 0.5 rpm  minimum,
      2.0 rpm maximum.
 (c)  Charge mass,  50 g (0.11 Ib) minimum,
      200 g (0.44 Ib)  maximum,  not  includ-
      ing the container and sorbent tare
      weight of 180 g (0.40 Ib).

 The other kiln operating parameters were
 kept constant as described in Phase 1.
                                           -288-

-------
     Reproducibility was much  better  for
the  liquids  reported here than for the
solids  reported  in Phase 1.  Figure 4
shows typical FID traces for two different
liquids at similar test conditions, and
again demonstrates the significant quanti-
tative and qualitative variations result-
ing  from charge  composition.   Nonlinearity
of the FID response was observed during
the  most intense puffs (greater than
10,000 ppm of THC).

     Again quadratic models were fitted
to the data, using weighted least squares,
where the weights were equal to the number
of replicates divided by the sample vari-
ance between replicates.  The  final re-
sponse models for peak area accounted for
99.4 percent variation in the  response
caused by changes in parameters.  Quad-
ratic models for peak heights  were very
similar to those for peak area, and
accounted for 98.9 percent of  the varia-
tion in the  response.  In all  cases,
increasing the kiln rotation speed in-
creased the peak area of the FID hydrocar-
bon  trace and the peak height.  This was
also true for the two chlorinated liquids.
Furthermore, for toluene and fuel oil,
both peak area (puff magnitude) and peak
height (puff intensity) increased with
increasing temperature.  This  result dif-
fers slightly from the solid plastic
results, where only puff intensity fol-
lowed this trend, and it conflicts with
the more traditional  viewpoint held with-
in the incineration community that high
incineration temperatures are always bene-
ficial.  This apparent perverse effect of
kiln temperature was also observed for
methylene chloride, but not for carbon
tetrachloride,.where results were less
definitive.

     Contour plots for toluene peak area
and peak height exhibited saddle contours
when concentrations of volatile hydrocar-
bons were very high (in excess of 10,000
ppm)(7).  These saddle contours are anom-
alous,  and cannot be explained by nonlin-
ear  response of the FID.  FID response
was found to be monotonic with THC concen-
tration up to 40,000 ppm.   A possible
explanation for the presence of saddles
in these plots (7) is that soot formation
is disproportionately accelerated at high
hydrocarbon loadings and that, therefore,
the remaining volatile hydrocarbons meas-
ured by the FID are no longer quantita-
tively  representative of total  puff size.
 §20-
 °10-
            {•) TOLUENE
             200.0 g IQ.441 Ib)
             0.5 rpm
             1329K|1933°FI
(b) CARBON TETRACHLORI06
  200.0 g(0.441 Ib)
 i 0.5 rpm      ;

 I 1323 Kf1922°F|
Figure 4.  Comparison of toluene and carbon
           tetrachloride transient hydro-
           carbon peak shapes at similar
           trial conditions.
Saddles did not appear for the less
volatile fuel oil where hydrocarbon load-
ings were significantly lower.  Therefore,
we believe that, for the less volatile
wastes, such as the plastics described
.above, the FID peak area and peak height
contour plots can represent the magnitude
and intensity of the puff, provided the
hydrocarbon concentrations are not too
high.

     The similarity between contours of
integrated measurements (peak area) and
those of instantaneous values (peak
height) for the liquid wastes (7) suggests
that other integrated measurements, such
as that of particulate matter trapped on
filters during a puff, should also repre-
sent trends in both puff magnitude and
intensity.  Therefore, a statistical anal-
ysis was performed on the filter weight
recorded for each test.  The ensuing model
(r2 = 0.999) contained similar terms as
the peak area model.  Contour plots for
toluene and fuel oil, Figure 5, show con-
clusively that, as kiln temperature is
increased, the total  soot loading from
the kiln to the afterburner is increased;
i.e., a much larger puff is formed.  This
is significant, and once again points to
potential  failure if the kiln is operated
at too high a temperature.

     Filter residue mass cpntour plots for
methylene chloride were qualitatively
similar to those shown on Figure 5, but
                                          -289-

-------
                          (a)
            0.5'
                      1.0
                                 1.5
                                                       1.0
                                                                  1.5
                                           2.0 0.5
                                        KILN SPEED, rpm  >

Figure 5.  Effect of charge mass, charge surface area,  and kiln temperature
           on (a) toluene and (b) No. 5 fuel  oil particulate mass.  (Contour
           values denote filter loadings in milligrams).
                                                                             2.0
indicated only a slight dependence on
kiln temperature.  Carbon tetrachloride
contour plots for both filter residue and
peak area differed sharply from those
arising from all other liquids, and did
not lend themselves to physical interpre-
tation.  Furthermore, the carbon tetra-
chloride filter residues were not black
and did not resemble soot while those of
the others did.  This suggests that, for
wastes containing only carbon and chlo-
rine, neither the magnitude nor the
intensity of a puff can be determined from
measurements of either volatile (FID
measureable) hydrocarbons or integrated
filter residue mass.  Therefore, we
explored the value of using CO peak height
as an indication of the presence of puffs,
since this has been investigated by
others (8-15) as a measure of incinerator
performance.  Statistical analysis of the
data describing maximum peak values of CO
allowed a quadratic model, similar to
that for FID hydrocarbon peak area, to be
formulated with an r2- of 0.988.  The
resulting CO contour plots for this, and
indeed for all other liquids except
                                               toluene, were similar to the FID hydro-
                                               carbon peak height plots for fuel  oil.
                                               This suggests that, for fully chlorinated
                                               liquid waste compounds, CO may be a
                                               useful puff indicator.  However, when
                                               copious quantities of soot are formed,  as
                                               for toluene at high kiln temperatures,
                                               this indicator ceases to be valid and
                                               should not be used alone.  It would
                                               appear, therefore, that no single indi-
                                               cator of puffs exists for all types of
                                               wastes, and that it is desirable always
                                               to monitor at least all three indicators
                                               used in this work; namely, FID measurable
                                               hydrocarbons, CO, and integrated filter
                                               residue.  For the wastes considered here,
                                               however, it was always possible to choose
                                               one or more of these indicators such that
                                               physically interpretable contour plots
                                               resulted.
                                           -290-

-------
 TRANSIENT PUFF  COMPOSITION

 Phase  1:  Prototype  Solid  Plastic Wastes

     The  compositions  of  the transient
 puffs  from simple polyethylene  (PE) and
 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe pieces were
 determined using VOST  and SASS  stack
 sampling  trains  (16,17),  in conjunction
 with GC-MS analysis  (18).  These screening
 tests  were used  for  qualitative identifi-
 cation only since it was  not within the
 scope  of  this research to perform exhaus-
 tive quantitative chemical analyses.
 Results are presented  for a solvent blank
 and for the test conditions:

 (a)  A baseline  in which  the exact proce-
     dure  for charging was followed, but
     no charge was entered'(i.e., the gate
     was  opened and closed).
 (b)  One  test involving PE pipe with nine
     charges totalling 2.3 kg.
 (c)  Two  replicate tests  (c-1 and c-2),
     each  involving 50 percent  PE and 50
     percent PVC .pipe,  (by weight), each
     test  consisting of 10 charges total-
     ing  2.7 kg.
 (d)  One test involving 10 charges of PVC
     pipe  totalling 2.9 kg.

     In all  cases, the kiln was at high
 fire conditions  (1339  K,  1950 °F) and
 100 percent excess air, and the charges.
 were introduced at a rate of one every 10
 minutes.   The results  are shown on Table
 1 and  were  significant in that  they
 showed that hazardous  constituents are
 contained  in the puff, and that more
 diverse organochlorides were detected when
 the waste  consisted of PE/P'VC mixtures
 but not in  tests with  PVC alone.  This is
 consistent  with the transient results
 described  in the preceding sections.  PVC
 alone  is.devolatilized slowly,  and forms
 small   puffs of low intensity and magni-
 tude.   PE  alone, on the other hand,  forms
 intense puffs of great magnitude,  but
 with no chlorine content.   Therefore, the
 greatest likelihood of hazardous chlori- '
 nated  hydrocarbons being formed occurs
 when PE and PVC are mixed.  These  tests
 also indicated the presence of trace quan-
 tities of penta- through octachloro
 paradibenzo dioxins (PCDDs) and furans
 (PCDFs) in  several  of the  samples.   These
 data are presented in Table 2.   GC/MS with
 selected ion monitoring was  employed on
 concentrated samples.  No  PCDDs  or PCDFs
were detected from the  baseline  test (a),
  the PE test (b), or the solvent blank.
  Both PE/P.VC tests (c-1 and e-2) indicated
  the presence of several  of these compounds
  but only the second test (c-2)  was  quanti-
  fied.  The PVC test (d)  indicated the
  presence of octa-CDF.   Again, these
  results are consistant with proposed mech-
  anisms regarding puff  formation.
  Phase 2:  Liquid/Sorbent
       As  in  Phase  1,  compositions  of the
  transient puffs from the  liquid wastes
  were  determined using VOST and SASS stack
  sampling traias .in  conjunction with GC/MS
  analysis.   The ability of the kiln alone
,  to produce  PICs and,  additionally, its
  ability  adequately to destroy the POHC
  species, were examined.   Results are
  presented for a solvent blank and for the
  following test conditions:

  (a)   A baseline in which  the exact proce-
       dure for charging was followed, but
       no  charge was entered (i.e., the gate
       was opened and  closed).
  (b)   A sorbent/container  blank (10 charges
       totaling 1.8 kg).
  (c)   Two replicate tests  (c-1 and c-2),
       each involving  10 charges of toluene
       alone  totaling  3.8 kg (including 1.8
       kg  of  sorbent and container).
  (d)   Two replicate tests  (d-1 and d-2), of
       50  percent toluene and 50 percent
       carbon tetrachloride (by weight),
       each test consisting of 10 charges
       totaling 3.8 kg  (including 1.8 kg
       of  sorbent and container).
  (e)   One test involving 10 charges of
       carbon  tetrachloride totaling 3.8
       kg  (including 1.8 kg of sorbent and
       container).

       As  in Phase 1, the kiln was  operated
 at high fire conditions (1339 K,  1950°F),
 100 percent  excess air, and the  charges1
 were  introduced  at a rate of 'one  every 10
 minutes.   The VOST results show  benzene '
 and toluene  to be  present for all  of the
 tests including  the baseline test  (a),
 and carbon tetrachloride to  be present  in
 both the  toluene/carbon tetrachloride
 (d-1 and  d-2) and  carbon tetrachloride
 (e) tests.   ORE  calculations,  however,
 indicate  adequate  destruction  of the POHC
 species in excess  of  99.99 percent.
 Particulate  loadings, however, determined
 by SASS filter weights averaged over the
 entire 100 minute  test, exceeded the RCRA
 regulated limit  of 180 mg/dscm (0.08
                                          -291-

-------
Taole 1.
 Selected RCKA Appendix VIII compounds identified  in  test  burns charging
.polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride pipe.1

                      Solvent Basel1ne2  PE   PE/PVC3  PE/PVC3   PVC
                      Blank   (a)      (b)   (c-1)    (c-2)     (d)
(2-Ethylhexyl Jphthalate
Naphthalene
Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2 ,4-Trl chl orobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Fluoranthene
X XX
X XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X




            1 In all cases, the kiln was at high fire conditions (1339 K, 1950 °F),
             100 percent excess air (SR=2.0), 1 rpm kiln rotation, and 9 to 10 charges,
             averaging 270 g each, were charged one every 10 minutes.
            2 Baseline test sampled auxiliary fuel combustion gas products; no waste
             material charged.
            3 PE/PVC mixed charges were 50 percent each by weight.
Table 2.  PCOD and  PCDF flue gas concentra-
          tions determined from test burns
          charging  polyethylene and poly-
          vinyl chloride pipe.
Average flue gas concentration, ppt (volume).
Solvent Baseline PE
Blank (a) (b)
Mono-CDO
Di-CDD
Trl-COD
Tetr«-CDD
Penta-CDO
Hexa-COD
Hepta-CDD
Octa-COO

Hono-COF
01 -CDF
TM-COF
Tetra-CDF
Penta-COF
Kexa-COF
Hepta-CDF
Octa-COF


H
0
H
E



D
E
T
E
C
T
E
D


N
0
H
E



D
E
T
E
C
T
E
D


H
0
N
E



D
E
T
E
C
T
E
D
PE/PVC
(c-1)


D N
E 0
T T
E
c 0
T U
E A
D N
T
I
F
I
E
D
PE/PVC PVC
(c-Z) (d)
-1
-
-
5.4
3.4
-
18.4
13.4

-
-
-
20.1
-
58.1
62.8
27.2 10.9
 1- Hot detected

 gr/dscf,  corrected to 7 percent 03)  (19)
 for  all samples except the baseline  (a),
 sorbent/container blank (b), and carbon
 tetrachloride (e) experiments.  The
 toluene  (c-1 and c-2) and toluene/carbon
 tetrachloride (d-1 and d-2) tests exceeded
 the  particulate limit by as much as  a  fac-
 tor  of nine.

     Extracted and concentrated samples
 from all  parts of the SASS train were
 combined.  Table 3 presents a selected
 list of major peaks identified by GC/MS
 analysis.  The data show contaminant
 phthalate ester and chlorocyclohexanol
                                       species present in all the samples, in-
                                       cluding the baseline  (a) and sorbent/
                                       container blank (b).  Of interest is the
                                       detection of several polycylic aromatic
                                       hydrocarbon (PAH) compounds (acenaphtha-
                                       lene, anthracene, fluoranthene, and
                                       pyrene) in the toluene samples (c-1 and
                                       c-2), but not in the toluene/carbon
                                       tetrachloride (d-1 and d-2) or carbon
                                       tetrachloride (e) samples.  In addition,
                                       low concentrations of tetra- and penta-
                                       chlorobenzene were detected in the
                                       toluene/carbon tetrachloride samples  (d-1
                                       and d-2), but not in any of the other
                                       samples.  The carbon tetrachloride  (e)
                                       sample was found to be free of both the
                                       chlorinated benzene and PAH compounds.
                                       Again these results are consistent with
                                       the transient results presented in the
                                       previous sections of this paper and with
                                       the analytical results from Phase 1.

                                            Samples were also analyzed for PCDDs
                                       and PCDFs.  Again, GC/MS with  selected
                                       ion monitoring was employed on concentra-
                                       ted samples.  Table 4 summarizes the  in-
                                       tegrated concentrations of PCDD and PCDF
                                       species identified in these flue gas
                                       samples.  No PCDDs or PCDFs were detected
                                       in the solvent blank, baseline  (a),
                                       sorbent/container blank  (b), or toluene
                                       (c-1 and c-2) samples.  Both the toluene/
                                       carbon tetrachloride  mix  (d-1  and d-2)
                                       and the carbon tetrachloride  (e) samples
                                       contain parts per trillion concentrations
                                       of tetra- through octachloro dioxins  and
                                       furans.  The carbon tetrachloride sample
                                       (e) contained substantially less PCDDs
                                            -292-

-------
Taole 3.
Selected compounas identified  in  test burns charging  toluene --jnd
carbon tetracnloride.l

       Solvent  Baseline  Sorbent/  Toluene  Toluene  Toluene/      Toluene/      Carbon
       Blank    (a)3     Container  (c-1)   (c-2)   Carbon       Carbon        Tetrachloride
                       Blank                   Tetrachloride  Tetrachloride  (e)
                       (b)	(d-l)4	(d-2)4
Chlorocyclohexanol X X X
Phthalate ester XXX
Tetrachl orobenzene^
Pentachl orobenzene^
Naphthalene
Acenaphthalene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
X
X


X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X





 1 In all cases, the kiln was at high fire conditions  (1339 K, 1950 °F), 100 percent excess air (SR=2.0), 0.5 rpm kiln
  rotation, and 10 charges of 380 g (0.84 lb) each (Including 180 g, 0.40 Ib, centalner/sorbent), were charge one every
  10 minutes. Trace quantities of varying chlorinated compounds were identifed in all samples Including baseline,
  sorbent/container blank, and toluene samples.
 2 Present in low concentrations in comparison to others listed, but not identified in any other sample.
 3 Baseline test sampled auxiliary fuel combustion gas products; no waste material charged.
 4 Toluene/carbon tetrachloride charges were 50 percent each by weight.
and PCDFs  than did the toluene/carbon
tetrachloride mix samples  (d-1  arid d-2)
in comparison.  However, it must be
restated that all these samples represent
effluent from the kiln prior  to the
afterburner,  and therefore describe what
must be destroyed by the afterburner or
removed downstream.

DISCUSSION

     A significant distinguishing property
of both solid and liquid waste, regarding
the generation of puffs, is its stoichio-
metric oxygen requirement.  However,
other fundamental mechanisms  governing
the generation of puffs for plastic
wastes are different than  those for
liquid wastes on sorbents.  For the
former, the volatile release  rate de-
pended on  the rate of pyrolysis of the
plastic, and  this could be correlated
with differential thermogravimetric
analyses.   For liquid wastes  on sorbents,
thennogravimetric analysis showed no
interesting distinguishing features be-
tween wastes  and therefore could not be
related to tne contour plots  describing
the transients.  Rather, the  volatile
release rate  is most probably controlled
by heat transfer to  (and simple evapora-
tion from) the sorbent, and the surface
exposure of the sorbent to the surround-
                                       ings.   If  this hypothesis  is  correct,
                                       then the important waste parameters for
                                       liquid  wastes would be their  normal boil-
                                       ing points  and their latent heats'of
                                       vaporization.  One might further hypothe-
                                       size that  surface exposure of the sorbent
                                       is increased as kiln rotation speed is
                                       increased.   This hypothesis is consistent
                                       with all the data presented here, which
                                       indicate that both puff magnitude and in-
                                       tensity increase witn increasing kiln
                                       rotational  speed.  Work is in progress to
                                       test these  hypotheses using phenomenolog-
                                       ical models.

                                            Time  resolved measurement of puffs
                                       is not  trivial.  Volatile hydrocarbons
                                       give a  fair indication when levels are
                                       not too hign (e.g., at Tow to moderate
                                       volatile release rates), as for fuel  oil
                                       or plastics.  Filter residue  mass was a
                                       better  indicator for toluene,  when black
                                       particulate matter appeared to be the
                                       prime constituent of a puff.   Neither of
                                       the above was suitable for carbon tetra-
                                       chloride waste, for which CO  appeared to
                                       be the  better on-line indicator.  However,
                                       CO was  a poor indicator for toluene.
                                       Therefore,  we conclude that no single
                                       on-line measurement is suitable for all
                                       liquid  wastes, and that the omission  of
                                       any one of  the indicators used here might
                                       lead to error.  However, siiiultaneous
                                              -293-

-------
Table 4   PCUO and PCDF flue gas concentrations determined from test burns
          charging toluene and carbon tetrachlonde.

     Average flue gas concentration, ppt (volume)

Kono-CDD
D1-CDD
Trl-CDO
Tetra-CDO
Penta-CDD
Kexa-CDD
Hepta-COD
Octa-CDD
Mono-CDF
D1-CDF
Trl-CDF
Tetra-COF
Penta-CDF
Hexa-COF
Itepta-CDF
Octa-COF
Solvent
Blank


N
0
N
E


D
E
T
E
C
r
E
D
Baseline Sorbent/ Toluene
(a) Container (c-1)
Blank
	 (b) 	


H
0
N
E


D
E
T
E
C
T
E
D


N
0
N
E


D
E
T
E
C
T
E
D


N
0
N
E


D
E
T
E
C
T
E
D
Toluene
(c-2)


N
0
N
E


D
E
T
E
C
T
E
D
Toluene/ Toluene/ Carbon
Carbon Carbon Tetrachlorlde
Tetrachlorlde Tetrachlorlde (e)
(d-1) (d-2)
.1
~
1.3
1.3
0.8


-
-
14.1
16.9
7.7
1.2
-
"
1.8
2.5
17
./
0.7
0.2

-
~
8.4
21.5
12.9
2.5
0.2
-

0.9

0.6

.

0.9
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.8
      1- Hot detected
measurements of volatile hydrocarbon
concentration, filter  residue mass, CO,
C02»  02.  and NOX as  puff indicators appear
to  span the waste conditions encountered
in  this study.

      Puffs consist of  toxic secondary
combustion products  (PICs).  Chlorinated
PIC compounds  are more likely to  be
formed when mixtures of dissimilar mater-
ials, such as  PE and PVC or toluene and
carbon tetrachlonde,  are  burned, than
when  PVC  or carbon tetrachloride  are
burned alone.  PVC or  carbon tetrachloride
form  relatively  small  puffs.  Excess oxy-
gen is neither totally depleted nor dis-
placed, and even though large quantities
of  chlorine are  present,  few chlorinated
PICs  are  formed.   PE or toluene alone,  on
the other hand (toluene is a known  soot
precursor), form intense  puffs  of great
magnitude.  Excess oxygen  is much more
extensively depleted or displaced,  and
although  no chlorine is present to  allow
the formation  of chlorinated  PICs,  there
1s  a  propensity  to  form large quantities
of  soot and  associated PAH compounds.
 PE/PVC or toluene/carbon  tetrachloride
mixtures  provide both the necessary
 chlorine and  pyrolytic conditions to  pro-
mote chlorinated PICs.  Therefore,  carbon
 tetrachlonae alone may not be  the most
 suitable surrogate compound to  investigate
 the formation of PICs, at least in the
 transient mode.
     Finally, the thermudynamic stability
of certain chlorinated compounds,  includ-
ing TCDD [thermochemistry from Tsang and
Shaub (20)], was investigated for  a wide
range of local stoichiometries likely to
be valid in the puff.  Multicomponent
equilibrium calculations, involving 33
species, indicated that very fuel-rich
conditions possibly encountered in the
puff could create thermodynamically
stable trace quantities of CHgCle
and COC1 but that predicted TCDD mole
fractions were always less than 10"19.
The levels of TCDD compounds measured in
this work are above equilibrium concentra-
tions for all possible conditions  in the
puff; therefore, their formation is
likely to be  kinetically, rather than
equilibrium,  controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

     A  laboratory  rotary  kiln  simulator
can yield useful  insight  into  factors
influencing  the  formation of transient
puffs caused  by  the  batch introduction of
both solid  and  liquid  wastes.   The  data
suggest  that  the volatility of the  waste,
or rather,  the  rate  of volatile matter
release, is  of  paramount  importance  in
determining  the occurrence of  puffs.
There are therefore  large differences
between  solid and liquid  wastes,  and  more
volatile substances  yield larger  puffs
more  readily.  These transients can be
minimized  at lower kiln temperatures,
                                            -294-

-------
 which is contrary  to nonia'1  practice.
 Devolatilization of the waste,  however,
 was  visually  observed to depend on  many
 physical  events occurring in  the kiln,
 including,  but not  limited to,  the  way in
 which the waste contacted both  the  kiln
 walls and the flue  gas  from the main
 burner.

      Transient puffs  can be easily  gener-
 ated  in  the kiln and  contain  hazardous
 substances even from  quite innocuous com-
 pounds such as polyethylene and polyvinyl-
 chloride.  DREs calculated for  liquid
 wastes were greater than 99.99  percent.
 Mixtures  of wastes can  lead to  more di-
 verse hazardous substances than  wastes
 incinerated individually.

      The  most significant' implication for
 practical systems is  that  the afterburner
 plays an  essential  role  in preventing
 transient puffs from  both  solid  and
 liquid wastes from entering the  environ-
 ment.  Great care must £>e  taken  in the
 afterburner design  to ensure that the puff
 components are properly  oxidized and de-  '
 stroyed.   Future work could be directed
 at ensuring that the  kiln performs more
 efficiently as a thermal oxidizer rather
 than merely as a pyrolysis furnace.  This
 work suggests that  this  is not to ba
 achieved simply by  operating at high
excess air,  at high temperatures, and
with good contacting.  In fact, for the.
 latter two variables, the converse may be
true.

 REFERENCES

 1.  H.W.  Fabian, P. Reher, M. Schoen,
    "How  Bayer Incinerates Waste,"
    Hydrocarbon Processing, 4,  183-192
    (1979).

 2.  Tanner, R.K., "Incineration  of Indus-
    trial Waste," Progress in Energy and
    ConiDustion Science,  5, 245-251 (1979).

 3.  T.A.   Bonner, C. L. Cornett, 8.0. Desai,
    J.M.  Fullenkamp,  T.W.  Hughes, M.L.
    Johnson, E.D. Kennedy, R.J.  McCormick,
    J.A.   Peters, D.L. Zanders,  "Engineer-
    ing Handbook for  Hazardous Waste
    Incineration,"   Monsanto Research
    Corp., EPA-SW-889 (NTIS PB 81-248
    163), U.S. EPA, Industrial Environmen-
    tal Research Laboratory, Cincinnati,
    OH (1981).
 4.   W.P.  Liriak, J.D.  Kilgroe, J.A.
     McSorley,  J.O.L.  Wendt, J.E.  Dunn,
     "On the Occurrence of Transient Puffs
     in a Rotary Kiln  Incinerator  Simu-
     lator:  I.   Prototype Solid Plastic
     wastes," J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc.
     37(1):54 (1987).

 5.   I. Frankel, N.  Sanders, 6. Vogel,
     "Survey of the  Incinerator Manu-
     facturing  Industry," Chemical  Engi-
     neering Progress,  3, 44-55 (1983).

 6.   C.R.  Hicks, "Fundamental  Concepts in
     the Design of Experiments," 2nd
     Edition,  Holt,  Rinehart and Winston
     Inc., New  York, NY (1973).

 7.   W.P.  Linak, J.A. McSorley, J.O.L.
     Wendt,  J.E. Dunn,  "On  the Occurrence
     of Transient Puffs in  a Rotary  Kiln
     Incinerator Simulator:  II. Contained
     Liquid  Wastes on Sorbent," Submitted
     to J. Air  Pollut.  Control  Assoc.
     (1987).

 8.   J.C. Kramlich, M.P.  Heap,  W.R.  Seeker,
     S.S. Samuelsen, "Flame-mode Destruc-
     tion of  Hazardous  Waste Compounds,"
     20th Symposium  (International)  on
     Combustion, The Combustion Institute
     (1984).

 9.   W.R. Seeker, J.C.  Kramlich, M.P. Heap,
     "Laboratory-scale  Flame  Mode Study Of
     Hazardous  Waste Incineration."  9th
     Annual Research Symposium-Incineration
     And Treatment of Hazardous Waste,
     EPA-600/9-84-015 (NTIS  PB84-234525),
     U.S.  EPA,  Industrial Environmental
     Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH
     (May 1984).

 10.   S.L. Daniels, D.R. Martin, R.A.
     Johnson, A.D. Potoff, J.A. Jackson,
     R.H. Locke, "Experience In Continuous
    Monitoring Of A Large Rotary Kiln
     Incinerator for CO, C02 and 02," 79th
    Annual  Meeting - Air Pollution Control
    Association (June  1985).

11.  S.L. Daniels, R.A.  Johnson, J.D.
    Wilson,  "Significance Of Major Gaseous
    Species  In  Combustion And Destruction
    Of Hazardous Waste  Constituents,"
    1985 Annual Meeting - American Instir
    tute of  Chemical Enginers (November
    1985).
                                           -295-

-------
12. R.K. LaFond, J.C. Kramlich, W.R.
    Seeker, G.S. Samuelsen, "Evaluation
    Of Continuous Performance Monitoring
    Techniques For Hazardous Waste Incin-
    erators," J. Air Pollut. Control
    Assoc. 35(6):653 (1985).

13. L.J. Staley, "Carbon Monoxide and ORE:
    How Well Do They Correlate?" llth
    Annual Research Symposium - Incinera-
    tion And Treatment Of Hazardous
    Wastes, EPA-600/9-85-028 (NTIS PB86-
    199403), U.S. EPA Hazardous Waste
    Engineering Research Laboratory, Cin-
    cinnati, OH (April 1985).

14. V.A. Cundy, J.S. Morse, D.W. Senser,
    "Practical  Incinerator  Implications
    From A Fundamental Flat Flame Study
    Of  Dichloromethane Combustion," J.
    Air Pollut. Control Assoc.  36(7):824
    (1986).

16. G.L.  Huffman,  L.O. Staley,  "The Forma-
    tion  Of  Products  Of  Incomplete  Combus-
    tion  In  Research  Combustors," 12th
    Annual  Research  Symposium  - Land  Dis-
    posal,  Remedial Action,  Incineration
    And Treatment  Of  Hazardous  Waste,
    EPA-600/9-86-022  (NTIS PB87-119491),
    U.S.  tPA Hazardous Waste Engineering
    Researcn Laboratory,  Cincinnati,  OH
     (April  198b).

 16.  L.D.  Johnson,  R.6.  Merrill, "Stack
     Sampling for Organic Emissions,"
    Toxicological  and Environmental  Chem-
     istry, 6, 109-126 (1983).

 17.  L.U.  Johnson,  "Detecting Waste  Com-
     oustion Emissions,"  Environmental
     Science and Technology, 20:3, 223-227
     (1986).

 18.  ft.H.  James, R.E. Adams, J.M.  Finkel,
     H.C.  Miller, L.O. Johnson, "Evalua-
     tion  of Analytical  Methods for the
     Determination of POHC in Combustion
     Products," J.  Air Pollut.  Control
     Assoc., 35(9):959 (1985).

 19.  1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amend-
     ments to the 1976 Resource Conservation
     and Recovery Act.
20. W. Tsang, W.  Shaub, "Environmental
    Consequences  Arising From The Combus-
    tion of Municipal  Solid Waste," Pro-
    ceedings of Resource Recovery From
    Solid Wastes, S. Sengupta, K.V. Wong,
    eds., Miami Beach, FL (May 1982),
    Pergamon Press, New York, NY.
                                            -296-

-------
              ON-LINE MONITORIMG OF ORGANIC  EMISSIONS  WITH A MOBILE  LABORATORY
                                      Sharon L. No!en
                      Air  and  Energy  Engineering Research Laboratory
                            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                             Research  Triangle Park, NC  27711


                         Jeffrey V. Ryan and Richard Bridge, Jr.
                                    Acurex Corporation
                                      P. 0. Box 13109
                            Research  Triangle Park, NC  27709
                                         ABSTRACT

      EPA's Hazardous Air Pollutants Mobile Laboratory (HAPML) was designed as an inte-
             1       ana        Packa96 f°r "*1 -time monitoring of comEion sSurcel

                                                        "               and i
           an
 *»t,u-r    recently Participated in a total  mass emissions test at a  full  scale
 KS7rkll-n ir*inerator'  The complete field test was conducted by EPA's  Hazardous
 Waste Engineering Research Laboratory under the  direction  of Robert C.  Thirnau and will
 be reported separately.  The HAPML collected continuous  emission monitor
™™l     raton
normal  operation.
                             /Pfn   °PSet3  2hich  simulated conditions which might occur
                           GC/FID was  used  for on-line  analysis of light hydrocarbons
                               train (VOST)  was used ^ collect samplls for ISalysis by
                                    compounds in the stack 9as-  co-
                              ?he dfta C011ect*l during the field test and other capabil-
  nclude  usina     MS          1?^ Delude exploring those other capabilities whichP
 include  using  the MS  as a  single ion monitor and testing the HC1 monitor.

 INTRODUCTION
     Because of the interest in determin-
ining the performance of an incinerator
on a real-time basis and the need to
characterize the emissions from a variety
of incinerators, EPA initiated a project
to build a mobile laboratory for continuous
monitoring of emissions and operating
parameters of hazardous waste incinerators.
The objective of this project was to
provide an integrated sampling and analy-
tical package for evaluation and develop-
ment of continuous and semicontinuous
monitors for hazardous waste incinerators.
The result of the project is the Hazardous
                                            Air Pollutants Mobile Laboratory (HAPML),
                                            designed to be easily transported for
                                            use by research projects at a variety of
                                            incinerators.

                                                 This paper willdiscuss the develop-
                                            ment of the HAPML, its capabilities,  data
                                            obtained while monitoring a hazardous
                                            waste incinerator, and future plans.

                                            DEVELOPMENT OF THE HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
                                            MOBILE LABORATORY

                                                 The HAPML was constructed as an
                                          -297-

-------
Integrated sampling and analytical  package
for use in hazardous waste incineration
research.  The HAPML utilizes extractive
sampling technology, and all  components
are housed in a standard 8 m long,
self-propelled van.

     The HAPML contains continuous moni-
tors for real-time analysis of CO,  C02,
NOX, 02, S02, and HC1.  Organic analytical
instrumentation includes a gas chromato-
graph (GO equipped with a flame ioniza-
tion detector (FID), and a mass spectro-
meter (MS).  The layout inside the van is
shown in Figure 1.

     The sampling system delivers a
portion of the gaseous effluent in the
stack to the HAPML while maintaining
sample integrity.  Major considerations
in  on-line analysis  include the interfer-
ences caused by particulates and moisture
and minimizing reactions and interactions
in  the sample line.

     All particulates must be  removed
from the sample stream because of problems
they may cause in  the analytical instru-
mentation: plugging  of the lines, damage
to  the optical system, or  light scatter
resulting  in  erroneous data.   The HAPML
uses a particulate removal system located
3 m from the stack sampling  port.  The
 particulate  removal  system is  housed in a
heated  aluminum  filter box and consists
 of a high surface area,  low  pressure
 drop,  spun glass-wool  filter.  Valves
 located in this  box allow calibration
 gases  to be  sent from the van, through
 the sampling system, back to the  van,
 and into the appropriate analytical  instru-
 ment for system checks.

      Water,  a natural  combustion  product,
 may condense in the analyzers or  can
 result in optical interferences.   The
 problems may be handled in different ways
 depending on the species of interest.
 The stack gas emissions flowing to the
 CO, C02, 02, and NOX monitors are cooled
 and dried using a condenser and a
 Perma-Pure dryer.   N02 is soluble in
 water.  However, since NOX is typically
 about 95% NO, the loss is negligible.
 Since S02 and HC1 are also soluble in
 water, these gases  would  be removed along
 with the water.  Therefore, these problems
 must be resolved with a different proc-
  edure.  A sample  conditioner  is used  to
dilute these gas streams with dry,  clean
air to minimize the interference effects
of water vapor.

     Considerations in temperature  and
material are required to ensure that reac-
tions in the sample line do not occur. A
Teflon line, heated to approximately 150°C,
is used to transport the sample from the
stack into the HAPML.  This limits  the
on-line organic analysis to those compounds
with boiling points less than the tempera-
ture of the sample line.  Many species of
interest lie outside this range and may not
be monitored in this fashion.  Care must be
taken to eliminate any cool spots in the
line, such as  at fittings.  If any chlorine
is in the system, stainless steel connec-
tions can react with the sample and must be
removed.  Teflon fittings or stainless
steel fittings lined with Teflon, which
eliminates contact between the stainless
steel and the  sample, must be used.

     The organic analytical  system was
designed to provide  information in a  variety
of ways.  The  sampling  system may be  used
to deliver  sample  gas:    directly to  the
GC/MS or the GC/FID  for semicontinuous
monitoring, to the MS for  on-line analysis
of  selected organic  compounds,  or to  the
FID  for total  hydrocarbon  (THC) concentra-
tion determination.   The HAPML  may  also be
used as an  on-site laboratory  for volatile
organic analysis.   It is equipped with a
Volatile  Organic Sampling Train (VOST) for
 collection  and concentration of the gas
 effluent  if the compounds of interest are
 present below the detection  limits  of the
 analytical  instrumentation (1).  These sam-
 ples may  be analyzed on the  GC/MS  or the
 GC/FID using a NuTech purge  and trap system
 with a clamshell oven for thermal  desorption.
 The purge and trap unit is equipped with a
 Tekmar sparger tube assembly.   A quick
 analysis may be invaluable in determining
 the amount of stack gas to be concentrated
 to provide the proper amount of sample  for
 more extensive analytical procedures.
 Also, orgam'cs collected on a sorbent
 material  may be suspected of reacting,
 partially desorbing, or becoming contam-
 inated if they are not stored properly or
 if  they are not analyzed quickly enough.
 Therefore, analyzing the samples on-site
 improves the  reliability of the results.

      A two column option has recently been
 added  to the  GC to  allow  simultaneous
                                            -298-

-------
 operation of the GC/MS and the GC/FID.
 VOST samples may be analyzed on the GC/MS
 while the GC/FID is used for semicontin-
 uous monitoring of selected compounds or
 vice versa.  The only limitation is the
 temperature of the oven.  It may be
 operated isothermally or, if a temperature
 program is used, the runs for the GC/FID
 and the GC/MS must be started simultan-
 eously.

      Standard gases traceable to the
 National  Bureau of Standards (NBS)  are
 used to calibrate the continuous emission
 monitors  (CEMs) for quantitative analysis.
 Onboard storage is available for gas
 cylinders.   A zero calibration (typically
 nitrogen  gas) and standards in two  concen-
 trations  are used each day  of sampling to
 calibrate the instruments.   The zero and
 the standard closer to the  concentration
 seen while  sampling are checked during
 the middle  and at the end of the sampling
 period.   If analyzed concentrations  of
 these gases fall  outside specified  limits,
 the instruments are recalibrated.   The
 values  from the calibration  checks  are
 used to determine the precision and
 accuracy  of the instruments.

      The  organic  system is calibrated
 similarly,  although  the  standards vary.
 When VOST analyses  are being  done, organic
 liquids are  injected  onto VOST  cartridges,
 desorbed, and analyzed according to  the
 VOST protocol.  Standard  gases  for common
 organic classes are  sometimes used,  as
 well  as liquids injected  directly into
 the  GC.   The  HAPML  is  also equipped with
 a permeation  chamber  for calibration of
 the  organic system and  the HC1 monitor.
 Most  analysis done with the organic
 system  is qualitative  and semi-quanti-
 tative.   Precision and accuracy of the
 instruments are determined similarly to
 the CEMs.

     All MS and CEM data are acquired by
 two onboard computers  (a DEC POP 11 and a
 Compaq Deskpro 286).  FID data are ac-
 quired using an HP 3393A integrator.
 Backup of data collected is provided by
strip chart recorders for the CEMs and a
tape backup in the Compaq computer.

TOTAL MASS EMISSIONS (TME) TEST

     Field tests conducted by the
 Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
 Laboratory (HWERL) indicate that most
 facilities achieve high DREs (2).  How-
 ever, both the studies and the EPA's
 Science Advisory Board's later review
 raised additional  questions about the
 performance of hazardous waste inciner-
 ators.  A major concern is the unident-
 ified emissions, both compounds referred
 to in Appendix VIII of the Solid Waste
 Methods 846 (SW846) as well as those not
 listed that are formed in the combustion
 process.  The concerns expressed are not
 limited to simply  stack emissions,  but
 all  other posssible effluents.   These
 include organics,  trace metals, and other
 chemicals associated with incinerator
 ash, spent water,  and particulates.
 Because of this concern, HWERL  initiated
 a project to quantify the total  mass
 emissions (TME) from a commercial incin-
 erator.   HWERL had complete responsibil-
 ity  for the TME test, under the direction
 of Robert C.  Thurnau.  Services of  the
 HAPML were requested to provide CEM and
 on-line GC/FID data.   The opportunity
 also allowed for further evaluation  of
 the  capabilities of the HAPML in field
 conditions.

      The TME  project was conducted  at a
 full  scale,  industrial  rotary kiln  incin-
 erator.   Two  sets  of triplicate  2 hour
 tests  were scheduled.   One  set was per-
 formed under  steady state conditions
 similar  to those used for a trial burn.
 The  second set of  tests  was conducted
 under  transient conditions which included
 variations in  the  process similar to
 those  expected  during  routine incinerator
 operations.

     The process tested  is a multiple
 stream hazardous waste incinerator with a
 horizontal rotary kiln,  secondary combus-
 tion chamber, and wet  scrubber.  Waste
 feed streams consist of  the solid waste
 to the kiln and a liquid mixture of
 organic and aqueous waste to the second^
 ary chamber and the kiln.

     During this study, three types  of
 solid waste were fed to the kiln:  alter-
 nate drums containing hydroxypropylmethyl
cellulose, polyethylene wax or powder,
and chlorinated pyridine tar were fed
into the kiln at a  rate of 20 bbl/hr
 (3200 1/hr).  The waste drums began
                                          -299-

-------
feeding Into the kiln about 30 min prior
to the beginning of each test period to
compensate for the 30 to 60 min kiln
residence time.

     A single liquid organic tank was
prepared with a 5% spike of carbon tetra-
chloride.  The tank was continuously
agitated to preserve homogeneity.  The
plant fired other wastes until the samp-
ling crews were ready and then switched
to the spiked waste.  Sampling took place
during this period.  During the steady
state tests, the liquid waste was fed
into the kiln* and the secondary chamber
at about 2 gpm (7.6 1pm).  This feed rate
was increased by fully opening the control
valve for 7 sec approximately every 30
rain to simulate transient conditions.

HAPHL THE RESULTS

     CEH data were acquired every 5 sec
and recorded in 30 sec averages.  Table  1
lists the average concentrations for the
six tests for  QZ, C02, and CO.  Tests  1
through 3 are  steady state tests, while  4
through 6 are  transient  tests.  The
triplicate  steady state  runs  show very
good  reproducibility.  The QZ varied from
8.1 to 8.9%, the COz from 6.3 to 6.4%,
and the CO  from 0 to 1 ppm.

      Although  an effort  was made  to
achieve  reproducibility  for  the  transient
tests as well, the  results  show  a  fairly
wide  range  of  values resulting from the
three tests.   In  all cases,  the  peak
shape for  the  CO concentration resulting
from  the induced upset and corresponding
increase in CO concentration was  similar.
The peak maximum occurred about 1 min
 after the  initial  increase in CO concen-
 tration and did not decrease to the
 normal  level  until  about 3 min after
 first rising above the standard concen-
 tration.  The minimum level  of 02 and the
 maximum level  of COe occurred simultan-
 eously during the transient condition.
 The C0£ and QZ appeared consistently as
 mirror images of the other.  There is
 little difference between the two types
 of tests in the 02 and C02, and the
 transient conditions are not obvious.
 The relationship between the time of
 occurrence for the extremes of the 02 and
 C02 concentrations and the maximum in the
 CO concentration varied.
     The GC/FID was used for on-line
monitoring of low molecular weight hydro-
carbons.  Only methane and ethylene were
detected.  Table 2 gives the results.
Averages of all readings for the steady
state tests are given.  Two averages are
given for each of the transient tests.
The data which occurred between the
transient conditions are given under
steady state, and the data acquired
during the transient conditions (when CO
maxima were apparent) are listed under
transient.  Ethylene was detected only
during the transient tests and, except in
one instance, occurred simultaneously
with the transient condition.

     Test 4 shows an obvious difference
between the methane concentrations occurr-
ing between and at transient conditions,
as expected.  Tests 5 and 6 do not exhibit
this behavior.  A Mann-Whitney Two-Sample
Test was performed on the methane data to
determine  if  the two  sets of numbers  could
have occurred purely  by chance; i.e.,
that there was  no  real difference between
the two.  A Kendall's Rank Correlation
was performed to determine if  there was  a
correlation between the methane data  and
the CO  level.  Table  3  summarizes  the
results.   The larger  numbers indicate a
greater probability that  any difference
between the methane values or  any  corre-
lation  with  CO is  purely  chance.   The low
 numbers for  Test 4 indicate  that  there  is
 a real  difference  between the  two  sets  of
methane data  in that  test and  that there
 is a good correlation between  the  methane
 and CO  concentrations.  The  unexpected
 results of Tests  5 and 6  could possibly
 be explained by some  other upset  in the
 system that damped out the effect of the
 induced upset.

      VOST samples were taken to determine
 if any volatile organics  were present
 below the detection limit of the  instru-
 ment.   The major peak detected could not
 be identified.  The next two peaks in
 order of intensity were benzene and
 toluene.  Benzene averaged 13 ppb for the
 steady state tests.  Figure 2 compares
 the benzene  concentration of the transient
 tests, after subtracting the background
 or steady state level, with the peak
 maximum of the CO concentration which
 occurred during the VOST run.  Although
 data are limited, Figure 2 suggests  that,
 while  CO may not be  a good indicator of
 ORE (3), the CO level may be  related to
                                            -300-

-------
 the concentrations of at least some PICs.
 Each data point represents only one VOST
 analysis.  No change was seen in the
 toluene concentration between the steady
 state and transient tests.  It remained
 at 2 or 3 ppb for all tests.

 CONCLUSIONS

      The results of the field test indi-
 cate that the HAPML can be successfully
 operated in the field and produce quality
 data.   The HAPML was audited  during the
 field trip discussed in this  paper and
 was  found to be acceptable with  minor
 recommendations.   All  recommendations
 have since been implemented.

      Several  problems  in  the  MS  have
 since  been identified,  and steps  have
 been taken to  correct  them.   These
 include  an update  of all  software,  im-
 provement of the library  search capabili-
 ties,  and  making the single ion monitoring
 capability operational.   It is hopeful
 that the MS, in the  single ion monitoring
 mode,  can  be used  as a continuous monitor
 for PICs.  There is, without question, a
 need for real-time measurement capability
 for hazardous waste incinerators.  The
 HAPML provides a means of testing a
 number of  incinerators and can be used to
characterize the volatile organics and
permanent gas emissions.

REFERENCES

      1.  Hansen, E. M. "Protocol for the
          Collection and Analysis of
          Volatile POHCs Using VOST,"
          EPA-600/8-84-007, NTIS PB84-
          170042, March 1984.

      2.   Trenholm, A.  R.   and C.  C.  Lee.
          "Analysis of PIC and Total  Mass
          Emissions from an Incinerator."
          In Proceedings of the Twelfth
          Annual  Research  Symposium on
          Incineration  and Treatment  of
          Hazardous Waste,  April  21-23,
          1986,  pp.  376-381.   EPA-600/
          9-86-022,  NTIS PB87-119491, July
          1986.

      3.   Staley, L.  "Carbon  Monoxide
          and ORE:   How Well Do They
          Correlate?"   In  Proceedings of  the
          Eleventh  Annual Research
Symposium on Incineration and
Treatment of Hazardous Waste,
April 29 - May 1, 1985, pp. 23-25.
EPA-600/9-85-028, NTIS PB 86-199403,
September 1985.
                                          -301-

-------
                     TABLE 1.  CEM RESULTS
Test No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
02
(*)
8.9
8.1
8.6
8.2
8.7
10.3
8!
6.3
6.4
6.3
6.2
6.3
5.2
CO
(ppm)
1.0
0.0
0.1
9.0
11.7
14.3
          TABLE 2.  RESULTS OF ON-LINE 6C/FID MONITORING
Test No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Steady State
Methane tthylene
(ppm) (ppm)
1 .7 ND
1.1 ND
1.0 ND
1.9 0.8
93.2 ND
48.3 ND
Transient
Methane
(ppm)
NA
NA
NA
11.0
92.9
52.6
ttny i ene
(ppm)
NA
NA
NA
1.7
1.3
0.3
  NO = Not detected
  NA = Not applicable
             TABLE 3.  SUMMARY OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Test No.
                                    Probability
   4
   5
   6
Mann-Whitney

    0.036
    0.421
    0.238
Kendall

 0.005
 0.364
 0.168
                                   -302-

-------
 Cylinder
 Storage
          Bench
           Instrument Racks
Storage
                 Bench
                                     Computer
                                     Console
1
Inc
2
rganic
3
Anal)
4
rsis
5
                                 ^^_ Organic
                                     Analysis
                                    Door
                                 Air and Vacuun
                                    Controls
                                                         Operator
                                                        Compartment
     Figure 1.  HAPML floor plan.
         4A
     JQ
     O.
     0)

     0)
     0)
     m
40-


36-


32-


28-


24-


20-


16-
         12
          100
           200
                                               500
                                                600
                         300       400
                         CO (ppm)

Figure 2.  Comparison  of benzene concentration  and
maximum CO concentration.
                                -303-

-------
                TOTAL MASS  EMISSIONS  FROM A HAZARDOUS WASTE  INCINERATOR
                                   Andrew R. Trenholm
                               MIDWEST RESEARCH  INSTITUTE
                                  Kansas  City, Missouri
                                     Robert Thurnau
                          U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
                     Hazardous  Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                                    Cincinnati,  Ohio
                                        ABSTRACT


     Past studies of hazardous waste incinerators by the Hazardous Waste Engineering Re-
search Laboratory have primarily examined the performance of combustion systems relative
to the destruction  and  removal  efficiency (ORE) for Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) Appendix VIII compounds in the waste feed.   These earlier studies demonstrated
that In  general most facilities performed quite well relative to the ORE   However, sub-
sequent  review  by the Environmental Protection Agency's  (EPA)  Science Advisory Board
raised questions  about  additional  Appendix VIII or non-Appendix VIII  constituents that
were not identified in  the earlier tests and might be emitted from hazardous waste com-
bustion.  This  paper presents results of a characterization of incinerator effluents to
the extent  that the emitted compounds can  be  identified  and quantified   Measurements
were made of both Appendix VIII and  non-Appendix VIII  compounds  in  all  effluents (stack,
ash  water,  etc.) from  a full  scale  incinerator.  A broad  array  of  sampling  and analysis
techniques were used.  Sampling methods included Modified Method 5, volatile organic sam-
pling train  (VOST), and specific techniques for compounds such as formaldehyde.   Analy-
sis techniques  included gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography/mass  spectrometry
(GC/HS).  Continuous measurements  were also made for  a  variety of compounds including
total hydrocarbons  by flame ionization detector (FID).
 INTRODUCTION

      A common  theme in literature  and re-
 ligion dealt with the idea that the tri-
 als and tribulations experienced in life
 are a form of  punishment  resulting from
 our ancestor's  sins.   The problems  of
 toxic and hazardous wastes  can be com-
 pared with this concept  in  that we are
 now faced with the cleanup of hundreds of
 old disposal sites that now threaten the
 health and  well-being of thousands  of
 citizens.  Coupled with the  cleanup ef-
 fort is the idea that toxic and hazardous
 wastes generated today will  now be dis-
 posed  of in  an environmentally  safe
manner so as  not  to be a problem to fu-
ture generations.   As a public expression
of  commitment  to  cleaning  up existing
hazardous waste sites, the  Comprehensive
Environmental  Response  Compensation and
Liability Act  (CERCLA) legislation and
its reauthorization  Superfund Amendments
Reauthorization Act  (SARA)  were  enacted.
To  handle  the present  day  problems of
toxic and hazardous  waste disposal, the
RCRA was enacted  in 1976 and amended in
1984  by  the Hazardous  and  Solid Waste
Amendments  (HSWA).    Commensurate with
these statutes, the  EPA regards  incinera-
tion  as  one of the  principal technology
candidates  for the ultimate safe  disposal
                                           -304-

-------
 of wastes and promulgated  the following
 standards in the  Federal Register.  Vol-
 ume 46,   No. 15,  on  January 23,  1981.

 1.    An  incinerator must achieve a ORE of
      99.99 percent for each principal  or-
      ganic hazardous  constituent (POHC)
      designated  for  each  waste  feed.

 2.    An   incinerator  burning  hazardous
      waste must  not  emit   more  than
      1.8 kilogram/hour (kg/hr) of hydro-
      gen chloride  (HC1)  or must remove
      99  percent  of the hydrogen chloride
      from the exhaust gas.

 3.    An   incinerator  burning  hazardous
      waste must not emit particulate mat-
      ter exceeding  180 milligrams per  dry
      standard  cubic  meter  (mg/dscm).

      The above standards  only address  the
 POHC  residues  at the  stack and  fail to
 address  other  possible effluents such  as
 products of incomplete combustion (PICs)
 associated with  stack  gases, and POHC
 residues,  trace  metals, and other chemi-
 cals  associated with incinerator ash,
 spent water,  and particulates.   Because
 these effluents  may be equally  or more
 hazardous  than POHCs  themselves,  research
 is  needed to qualitatively  and quantita-
 tively study the  characteristics of all
 possible effluents  and to provide engi-
 neering  data for  regulatory  support.

      To  meet this  need, Midwest Research
 Institute  (MRI)  was  contracted  by  the
 Hazardous  Waste Engineering  Research Lab-
 oratory  (HWERL),  EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio,
 to  conduct an  inventory of  a hazardous
 waste incinerator in which  the total mass
 emissions  (TME) were measured and quanti-
 tated to the best  extent possible.   This
 paper presents  preliminary  results  from
 this  study.

 APPROACH

     This  study addressed two primary ob-
 jectives.   First,  a wide array of sam-
 pling and  analysis  (S&A)  techniques  were
 used  to  identify  and  quantify constitu-
 ents  in  all waste  streams to the extent
 possible.   Second,  the  emissions were
 measured  under two  operating conditions,
 steady state and with a transient combus-
 tion  upset.  The  steady state operation
was similar to conditions during  a trial
 burn and  the  transient upsets were in-
 tended to  simulate conditions that may
 occur at times during  normal  operation.

      The test site for this study was  se-
 lected after a number  of sites had been
 surveyed.   It was  desirable to select a
 site that would be most representative of
 hazardous waste incinerators  in the United
 States.   Though it is  impossible to be
 completely representative at any one site,
 the Dow Chemical Company  incinerator  in
 Plaquemine,  Louisiana,  was chosen because
 it had many of the equipment  components
 common to hazardous  waste incinerators
 and burned a  wide variety of  types of
 wastes.   The incinerator consisted of  a
 rotary kiln with liquid waste  injection
 and drummed  solid  feed,  secondary combus-
 tion chamber,  quench, and particulate  and
 HC1  control  devices.   The wastes  fed  to
 the incinerator during  the  tests  included
 solids and liquids  as follows:

 o     Solids -  Substituted cellulose
            -  Polyethylene  wax
            -  Chlorinated pyridine tar

 o     Organic liquids -  Isopar (2,2,4-tri-
                       methylpentane)
                     - Carbon tetrachlo-
                       ride

 o     Aqueous liquids - Runoff from diked
      area

      Each type of solid waste was  drummed
 separately and the drums were  automati-
 cally  weighed  and  fed  through a ram
 feeder to the  kiln  every 4 minutes (min).
 Drums  of the  different  types  of waste
were  fed  alternately.   A uniform  supply
 of  the liquid organic waste sufficient
 for about 100 hours (hr) of operation was
 accumulated  in a tank  and spiked with
about 10 percent carbon tetrachloride be-
 fore  the  test.  Liquid  organic  waste was
 fed  continuously  to both  the  kiln and
 secondary chamber,  and the aqueous liquid
waste was  fed  only  to the  kiln.   Natural
gas was fired in both the kiln and secon-
dary  chamber as needed  to maintain tem-
peratures.  Combustion  parameters (tem-
perature, airflows, etc.)  and  all feed-
rates are  controlled  by computer from  a
central control room.

     Essentially all  input and effluent
streams were sampled  and analyzed using,
                                          -305-

-------
a wide  variety of techniques.  Table 1
shows a summary of the sampling and anal-
ysis parameters and methods  used.   EPA's
mobile monitoring van  assisted MRI with
the sampling  and  Dow  Chemical conducted
parallel sampling and  analysis for many
of the  measurements (VOST, waste  feed,
scrubber water outlet).

     A  sufficient number of  the  solid
waste drums were set aside, numbered, and
sampled during  the week  prior to  the
test.   An  equal number of drums contain-
ing substituted  cello!use,  polyethylene
wax, and chlorinated  pyridine tars were
used.   The  solid  waste samples were ana-
lyzed  for  volatile  and  semivolatile
POHCs, chlorides, ash, and heating value.
Samples of the liquid organic wastes were
taken from  a  tap  at 15-min  intervals, as
were the aqueous wastes.   Both these sam-
ple types  were analyzed for  volatile and
seraivolatile  POHCs, chlorides, ash, and
heating value.  Viscosity of the liquid
organic waste was also measured.   The
scrubber waters were  sampled from a tap
at approximately  30-min   intervals,  and
analyzed for  POHCs  and other major con-
stituents.   The  bottom ash  hopper was
emptied at  the  start  of each  run  and a
sample was collected after each test run.
The ash samples were  analyzed for semi-
volatile compounds.

     The  stack sampling  included  two
Modified Method 5 (MM5)  trains,  a Vola-
tile Organic Sampling train, a midget im-
pinger train for aldehydes, an ORSAT sam-
pler, continuous  gas analyzers and three
GCs.  One MM5 train was analyzed for par-
ti culates  and anions  and the  other  was
analyzed for  semivolatile organics.  The
VOST samples  were analyzed for volatile
organic constituents.  The ORSAT sample
was analyzed  for  02  and C02.  The  con-
tinuous analyzers  included  02, CO, C02,
NO  and THC.  The grab sampling frequency
for the GCs depended  on the  column being
used and the  actual run conditions.  The
G! and  C3  hydrocarbons were  detected and
quantified  using  a  Porapak  QS column and
FID.  The  aromatic compounds  were de-
tected  and quantified using  a Megabore
624 column and a photoionization detector
(PID).  The halogenated  compounds  were
detected and quantified using  a Carbopack
624 column and a Hall detector.   The
GC  techniques used were designed  for
research measurements  and provided
intermittent, instantaneous values at se-
lected times.

DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

Process Data and Waste Characteristics

     Key process  data for each run are
presented in Table 2.  The process data
shown consists of kiln and secondary com-
bustion chamber temperatures, percent 02,
stack flow  rate,  natural  gas heat  input,
and total heat  input. The  total heat  in-
put is  the  sum of heat  input  from the
natural gas  and waste feed.   Ranges for
selected process data are shown in paren-
theses.

     Runs 1 through  3 were conducted  un-
der steady  state  operating  conditions.
However, runs 4 through  6 were altered
so that the incinerator  operated  with a
transient  combustion  upset.   Several
techniques  were attempted to accomplish
this transient  condition by causing  a
sudden increase in the  feed of volatile
waste to the  incinerator.  Attempts with
waste  fed  to the  rotary kiln, spiking
10 gallons  (gal.)  of volatile  hydrocar-
bons in drums of  solid waste or suddenly
increasing  the  liquid waste  feed,  failed
to produce a transient condition.   The CO
level did not change.  A sudden increase
in liquid organic waste  feed to the sec-
ondary  chamber  did  produce  sharp  in-
creases in  CO  and THC levels,  and  that
technique was chosen  to cause the transi-
ent condition.

     The liquid organic waste feedrate to
the secondary combustion chamber was sud-
denly  increased from a normal  2 gallons
per minute  (gal/min)  to 6 gal/min for ap-
proximately  7 seconds (sec)  and then  re-
turned  to  the  original  setting.   This
fluctuation  in  the  liquid organic waste
feedrate occurred 15  min  into the run and
approximately every 30 min throughout the
run.   A review of the  data in Table 2
shows  that  the  transient conditions did
not cause any major change in the process
parameters  shown on the table.

     Table  3  presents the average waste
characteristics for  the  steady state  and
transient test  runs.  The characteristics
compared  are feedrates,  heating values,
percent chlorine,  and percent  ash.  The
waste  characteristics did not change
                                          -306-

-------
significantly between  the two  sets  of
test runs.

Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Total Hydro-
  carbon (THC) Emissions

     One way  to  characterize the opera-
tion .of the  incinerator under  steady
state and transient conditions is to com-
pare CO and THC levels.  Table 4 presents
average CO  levels  and  ranges of CO  for
each run.   CO levels for the'steady state
conditions  (runs 1  through  3) averaged
near zero while the average for the tran-
sient  conditions  (runs  4 through  6)
ranged  from  10  to  15 parts  per  million
(ppm).   During transient conditions,  a CO
spike was registered approximately every
30 min with the levels  increasing rapidly
to about 700 ppm (1-min average) then de-
creasing quickly.

     Table 4  also  contains  the  average
and  range  of THC values  for each run.
The THC values  are  calculated as ppm of
methane.  MRI's runs 1 through 3 showed a
steady THC  level with  averages of 6 to
8 ppm.   Dow's average  THC  level  for
runs 1 through, 3 was less than the detec-
tion limit  (1 ppm).   MRI  run 4  had a
slightly elevated THC  level  of 9 ppm arid
peaks to 160 ppm during the transient up-
set.  MRI runs 5 and 6 had significantly
higher  THC  levels.   Run 5 produced  an
average THC of  150 ppm with  peaks up to
220 ppm, while run 6 produced an average
of 110 ppm and  peaks to 190 ppm.  Dow's
THC analyzer  malfunctioned during run 4.
Dow1 s run 5  produced an average THC of
99 ppm with peaks  up to 150 ppm.  Run 6
showed  an  average  THC  of 60 ppm with
peaks up to 63 ppm.  These high  THC  lev-
els were  largely accounted for by meth-
ane.  The  difference  between run 4  and
ruris 5  and  6  is under  investigation.

Volatile Compound Emissions

     Tables 5 and  6 present the stack
concentrations of  the  volatile  organic
compounds found  during  the steady state
and  transient operating  conditions,  re-
spectively.    Results from  both  MRI  sam-
pling and parallel  sampling by Dow Chemi-
cal are shown.   MRI  data for run 2 were
not  available for  presentation  in this
paper.   Comparison  of  the two  sets  of
data provides some perspective  on  the
variability  encountered  in  measurement
of these  low  levels  of volatile organic
compounds in incinerator stacks.  Table 7
shows the average results for the two op-
erating  conditions  and  also presents
blank values  for MRI's data.  The sample
values in these tables are not blank cor-
rected; therefore, the values  should be
viewed relative to the blank values.  The
acetone values, for  example,  are uncer-
tain when the blank values are  consid-
ered.  Also,  the chlorpmethane  data were
obtained  from GC  analysis  of  periodic
grab samples and may represent a somewhat
different  average  than the  other  com-
pounds collected  in the VOST.   Chloro-
methane has a low  boiling point and is
not  retained  well on  the Tenax  used in
the  VOST.  There were  indications in the
data that some portion  of the  chloro-
methane may also be attributable to blank
background levels.

     During steady  state conditions in
runs 1 and 3,  methane, chloromethane, and
chloroform were emitted  at the  greatest
rates, based  on the MRI data.   Methane
accounted  for 27  percent  of the total
volatile  emissions and chloromethane and
chloroform accounted for .another 7  per-
cent.  All other compounds were emitted
at much lower levels.

     The largest change in concentrations
between the steady  state  conditions and
the  transient conditions during runs 4
through 6 was  a substantial  increase in
methane emissions.   Dichloromethane and
benzene also  increased significantly, by
factors of 30  and 12,  respectively.  The
higher values  for  these two compounds,
however,   were  still  below 100 ppb.   No
other volatile compounds showed the large
increase  in concentration  as those  three
compounds.  Runs  5  and  6  showed much
higher concentrations of methane and di-
chloromethane than run 4  (see  Table 6).
This is not explained  at this time but
is similar to  the trend in THC  discussed
earlier.

     To  compare the volatile  compound
emissions to the total  THC emissions, all
results were  converted to  an equivalent
concentration in parts per billion  (ppb)
as methane.   The conversion factors from
ppb  to ppb as methane  are based on the
effective carbon number commonly used in
estimating FID  response  factors and on
measured  literature  values.  Table 8
                                          -307-

-------
presents a summary  of  the volatile com-
pound concentrations in  ppb  as methane.
This comparison  is  useful  to assess the
degree  that  total  emissions  have been
identified, but it does distort the rela-
tive mass  emissions between  compounds.
Nonchlorinated compounds  have a  higher
response on  a FID  detector than chlori-
nated compounds.   For example, compare
the  relative levels of  chloroform and
benzene on Table 7 versus Table 8.

     Table 9 compares the total  hydro-
carbon  concentrations with methane, total
volatile  and other compounds, based  on
the  data in Table 8.  Further analyses
are  being  completed to identify  some of
the  other  category.   A comparison of  the
average concentrations of the  two  sets  of
runs shows  a significant increase in  the
total  hydrocarbon  (THC)  concentration.
Methane concentration  increases  and also
becomes a  much larger proportion  of  the
emissions during the transient runs.  The
volatile  compounds increase  slightly in
concentration but  their  percent contribu-
tion to the total  hydrocarbon emissions
decreases.

     In addition to measurement of emis-
sion levels  of  volatile compounds, the
destruction  and removal  efficiency (ORE)
was  measured  for  carbon tetrachloride,
the  principal volatile  compound  in the
waste.   The DREs calculated from the MRI
data for  the steady  state  test runs
 ranged  from  99.998 to 99.9995.  DREs  dur-
 ing the transient test runs were  slightly
 lower,  ranging  from  99.994  to  99.998.
The DREs  calculated  from the Dow data
 ranged  from  99.9992  to  99.9998  for the
 steady  state  runs and  from 99.9995  to
 99.9997 for the transient runs.

 Particulate Hatter and HC1 Emissions

      Table 10 presents  the  particulate
 and HC1 emissions, and HC1 efficiency for
 each run.  The range of particulate emis-
 sions  was  9.0  to 35 milligrams/cubic
 meter  (mg/m3).  Ash loading to the incin-
 erator was  very low compared to typical
 operation of this incinerator and to typ-
 ical operation of other rotary kilns that
 burn hazardous  waste.   The range of HC1
 emissions was  0.066  to  0.11  kg/hr.  HC1
 efficiencies  averaged  99.95 percent.
 These  rates are all  very low compared  to
the regulatory limits and to typical re-
sults from  hazardous waste incinerator
tests.

CONCLUSIONS

     Final  conclusions  for  this project
will not  be available  until all of the
data have been analyzed.   However,  some
preliminary  conclusions  can be reached,
based  on  the  data presented  in  this
paper.   These conclusions are:

o    Methane was a substantial  portion of
     the  total hydrocarbons emitted from
     the  hazardous  waste  incinerator
     tested.   The percent  contribution
     from  methane was  higher  for the
     transient upset conditions than dur-
     ing  steady state operation.

o    MRI's  preliminary  data show  a  large
     portion  of  the total  hydrocarbons
     emitted  during  steady state opera-
     tion was  not accounted for with  the
     volatile  organic  compounds identi-
     fied.   Further  analysis  for  semi-
     volatile  compounds is expected  to
     account for  some of the unidentified
     portion.

o    The  change in concentration of vola-
     tile compounds  between the  steady
     state  and transient  upset conditions
     was  not uniform  across  compounds.
     It appeared  to  be  compound specific.
                                            -308-

-------
                        TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PARAMETERS AND METHODS
Sample
Liquid organic waste
Sampling
method
Tap (S004)
Sampling
frequency
for each run
One grab sample
every 15 nrin
composited into
one sample for
each run
Analytical
parameters
SV organics
Chlorides
Heating value
Ash
Viscosity
Analytical method
GC.MS
Organic halide (04327-84
or D808-81)
Calorimeter (D240-73)
Ignition (0482-80)
Viscometer (D-88-81)
Aqueous waste
Solid waste
Scrubber feed and
  effluent water
Ash


Stack gas
VOA vial1
filled from
composite

Tap (3004)
Tap (S004)


Scoop (S007)






Dipper (S002)
VOA vial
filled from
grab sample

Scoop (S007)
MM52
                                               One at end of
                                               run
One grab sample
every 15 rain
composited into
one sample for
each run

One VOA vial
every 15 min

One grab sample
per solid charge,
composited at end
or test
One grab sample
every 30 min
composited into
one sample each
run

One VOA vial
every 30 min
One grab sample
per run

2-hr composite
per run
                   V organics3
SV organics
Chlorides

Heating value
Ash

V organics
V organics

SV organics
Chlorides
Heating value
Ash

SV organics
                                                                  V organics
SV organics
                                                                  Particulate
                                                                  HC1
                                                                  Moisture
                                                                  Temperature
                                                                  Velocity
                   GC/MS
GC/MS
Organic halide (D4327-84
or 0808-81)
Calorimeter (0240-73)
Ignition (D482-80)

GC/MS
GC/MS

GC/MS
Organic halide (D432-84)
Calorimeter (02015-77)
Ignition (D482-80)

GC/MS
                   GC/MS
                                                           GC/MS
                                                           Gravimetric (EPA RMS)
                                                           Organic halide (D4327-84)
                                                           Gravimetric
                                                           Thermocouple
                                                           Pitot tube
                                                    -309-

-------
r
                                                                       TABLE 1 (Continued)
Sutple Sampling
method
MM5
VOST (S012)4
EPA Reference
Method 3
A132
Continuous
Gas sampling valve
Gas sampling valve
Gas sampling valve
or syringe
Sampling
frequency
for each run
2-hr composite
per run
Three traps
pairs at
40 min per
pair per run
One composite
sample per run
One composite
sample per run
1 min averages
~ once/30 min
~ once/30 nrin5
~ once/30 min5
Analytical
parameters
SV organ ics
Moisture
Temperature
Velocity
Method 624
Compounds
Oxygen,
carbon
dioxide
Aldehydes
CO, C02, 02
NO^, THC
Cj. to C3
hydrocarbons
Aromatics
Halogenated
organics
Analytical method
GC/MS
Gravimetric
Thermocouple
Pi tot tube
GC/MS
Orsat
HPLC
NOIR, NDIR, paramagnetic,
chemi luminescent, FID
GC/FID
GC/PIO
GC/Hall
or PID
                        NOTE:  Saopling method numbers (e.g., S004) refer to methods published in "Sampling and Analysis Methods for
                               Hazardous Waste Combustion," December 1983; analytical methods beginning with prefix 0 refer to ASTM
                               oettiods.
                        1  Volatile organic analysis vial.
                        *  HM5 - Modified Method 5.
                        3  Volatile organic constituents.
                        4  VOST = Volatile organic sampling train.
                        s  Maxinua rate permitted by analysis time.
                                                                             -310-

-------


























^c
J"—
^c
a

to
V)
UJ

o
a;
a.

CM
UJ
m
1—





































•P
s
•f—
U)
c
CO
f.
r-








ID

C
3
OS


m


3
OS





^"

C

ce















CU
IB
•P
U>
>,
CO
cu
•P
to







CO

c
3
a;





CM
C
3
^v*







rH

C
3
3£




















ID O
«*• in
rH in
rH
1
O
o
rH

•* ID
r- o
rH 00
rH
i
t~.
rH



tn oo
oo cn
i-H 00
rH
|
CM
00
i— 1





O

•P Ll_

.a
E cu
o i-
U 3
+J
£>£
to cu
•a D.
C E
O O)
O 4->
cu
to
CTl ^"*s
• CO
cn .
rH
I-H
1
cn

^
ID ^-N
• in
o .
rH T-T
I-H
1
'PP

00

CM /••>>'••
• I-H
rH .
rH CM
rH
1
co

' 0'
rH
in /— s
. CM
rH' .
rH CM
rH

CM

O
. rH



O ^"N
rHr-i
i-H
CO
6V
x^



rH^-x
. CO
Sr-1
rH
|
O
cn
v*-^













^
^0
s*^ t

N
0
0 00 0
CD • •
rH CM 00
rH in
in
CM



o oo oo
CD
CM •* CO
I-H ' . m'. : ",
in
CM




o co in
o
CO CO rH
- rH in
CO
C\J




O CM CO
O . • • ;
co CD cn

rT
CM







o o cn
0 rH
CO , . CO t
M ••«•"•
CM





CD o — av .. .
.CD •••'.'
CM cn CM
in
CM
CM







'E'
U
co


0) i- 31-
•P J= Q.J=
CO V, c "x.
S- *H 3 »r- 3
U) -P 

CO O -z. \— f ' -a cu CO 4-> U) cu U) .g -Q 3 GO O CD rH ^" CM t- O CU 3 r— CO > C j V CO cu t/> CO O) r— CO 3 CO iH ui co D) S- 3 •P CO c~ E Q t[ -P ' 3 a. c: •P' CO cu U) a> -o 3 (J .^ 4J 3 a. c- 4-> CO CU jr CO -p O (_ IM -311-


-------
TABLE 3.  AVERAGE WASTE CHARACTERISTICS





Solid
Chlorinated
Polyethylene
Substituted
Liquid organic
To kiln
To SCC
Liquid aqueous
Feedrates
(Ib/hr)
steady state/
transient

pyridine 1,300/1,350
wax 510/470
cellulose 1,110/1,230

520/490
820/820
5,010/4,940
HHV C1 (%)
(Btu/lb) steady state/
steady state/ transient
transient

1,970/1,700 26.40/20.80
15,240/17,100 0.016/0.010
6,980/6,250 0.39/0.61

18,000/17,980 10.70/10.80
18,000/17,980 10.70/10.80
15/0 0.0044/0.0023
Ash (%)
steady state/
transient


35.10/37.60
0.16/0.087
4.10/3.00

0.033/0.026
0.033/0.026
0.031/0.034

TABLE 4. PRELIMINARY AVERAGE CO AND THC LEVELS



,











Run CO (ppm)
EPA van
1 ~ 1
(0-86)
2 NA
(2
3 ~ 1
(0-2.6) (2
4 10
(0-720)
5 11
(0.58-710) (1
6 15
(0.03-710) (6


THC (ppm)
Dow MRI Dow
3.5 7,6 0
(3-4) (7.4-9.0)
3.5 6.8 0
.6-4.7) (5.8-7.9)
2.7 6.2 0
.5-3.3) (4.9-10.0)
20 8. 8 NA
(2-691) (4. 1-160)
7.9 150 99
.6-538) (100-220) (79-150)
33 110 60
.2-819) (79-190) (55-63)















                 -312-

-------
         TABLE 5.  PRELIMINARY STACK CONCENTRATIONS OF VOLATILE COMPOUNDS FOR
                   STEADY-STATE RUNS (ppb)  (NOT BLANK CORRECTED)
Compound
Methane
Chi oromethane
Dimethyl ether
Methyl bromide
Vinyl chloride
Methyl ene chloride
Acetone
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 , 1-Tri chl oroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Di chl orobromomethane
Benzene
Chlorodibromomethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachl oroethyl ene
CgHis
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
MRI run 1
l.yOO1
2201
19
0.051
0.86
3.7
8.7
4.2
0.99
63
2.7
0.25
3.9
14
4.9
. 2.3
2.0
0.14
1.2
1.2
7.9
0.11
1.0
Dow run 1
NA4
30
NQ3
ND
2.1
0.85
NQ
NQ
ND
16
1.2
0.16
2.0 ..
4.4
8.0
1.3
ND
1.2
0.36
ND
7.3
0.060
0.66
Dow run 2
NA
3.7
NQ
ND
ND
0.68
NQ
NQ
0.020
31
1.3
1.5
0.83
5.6
11
0.91
ND
0.083
0.33
ND
2.4
0.12
0.22
MRI run 3
l.SOO1
1001
0.63
0.15
1.2
1.7
7.9
0.18
0.050
65
0.22
1.2
1.3
13
2.1
1.7
0.25
0.029
0.41
0.76
0.94
0.086
0.14
Dow run 3
NA
ND2
NQ
X
ND
ND
0.77
NQ
"X
NQ
§1X
0.017
26
0.16
0.83
0.61
5.7
3.4
0.80
ND
0.044
0.30
ND
4.7
0.086
0.061
     Total
2,100
                                             NA
NA
1,500
                                                                                 NA
1  Data from GC analysis of grab samples; other data from GC/MS analysis of VOST
   samples.

2  ND = Not detected.

3  NQ = Not quantitated.  Compound detection was qualitative by GC/MS.  Quantisation
   will be made available for final report.

4  NA = Not available.
                                          -313-

-------
          TABLE 6.   PRELIMINARY.STACK CONCENTRATIONS OF VOLATILE COMPOUNDS FOR
                    TRANSIENT RUNS (ppb) (NOT BLANK CORRECTED)  -,
Compound
MRI
run 4
Dow
run 4
MRI
run 5
Dow
run 5
MRI
run 6
Dow
run 6
Methane                       4.4001
Chloromethane         '          200
Dimethyl ether      -              1.4
Methyl bromide                    2.3
Vinyl chloride                    0.74
Methylene chloride                5.4
Acetone                          13
Trichlorofluoromethane            0.26
1,1-Dichloroethylene              0.12
Chloroform                       73
1,2-Dichloroethane        ,       0.54
1,1,1-Trichloroethane             0.74
Carbon tetrachloride              7.4
Dichlorobromomethane             16
Benzene                          62
Chlorodibromomethane              4.6
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether         1.4
Bromoform                         6.4
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethylene       0.25
C8H18                            44
Toluene                           1.7
Chlorobenzene                     0.56
Ethyl benzene         .         ..  .  0.80

     Total                    4,800
NA4
2.3
NQ2
ND3
ND
.1.7
NQ
NQ
ND
28
0.49
0.40
0.69
6.8
25
0.52
ND
11
0.16
NQ
1.4
0.19
0.041
93,000*
200 1
1.5
3.8
1.8
150
12
0.39
0.27
> 24
0.097
0.40
11
1.2
19
0.54
2.2
0.64
0.16
3.6
0.92
0.58
0.18
NA
140
NQ
ND
ND
40
NQ
NQ
0.070
3.8
0.056
0.20
1.1
0.18
11
0.15
ND
0.47
0.039
NQ
11
0.36
0.034
51.0001
3101
1.5
, 4.3
2.8
91
12
0.75
0.25
18
0.46
0.22
3.3
2.9
56
0.35
0.66
0.11
0.087
< 0.0085
0.71
0.60
0.11
NA
81
NQ
3.0
0.70
37
NQ
NQ
0.12
9.9
0.34
0.25
1.1
2.1
7.4
0.16
ND
0.12
0.0087
NQ
2.0
0.54
0.045
NA    94,000
NA
52,000
                                         NA
 1  Data from GC analysis of grab  samples; other data  from GC/MS analysis of VOST
   samples.

 2  NQ = Not quantitated.   Compound  detection was qualitative by GC/MS.  Quantitation will
   be made avail able,for final  report.  .

 3  NO = Not detected.

 4  NA = Not available.
                                            -314-

-------



^
.a
a.
a.
**•''
to
a
CD
a.
g
u
UJ
— J
I-H

:ȣ
z
•=C
OO

z
^
OO
z
o
HH
Ej
) —

UJ
o
z
o
o
•f
t-
a
UJ UJ
0 I—
. o; •

S>












T3
.3
O
O.
E
O
O




CO
c
s



 s-


Co in
to c:
!- 3
01 s-

en 00 00 OO ID ID <3*
Z ZZZ ZZZ .... .Z..Z*.. Z

r- , CM rH rH





? r^ CM, r^ in f*^ oo vo
<4-mCX> «^-CM CO^-<^-00 OD^«^-rH rHincO
^ O rH CO rH CM CM O O 00 O O f^ to ID rH rH CM O ID rH CO O O
O ^J* 00 rH >CO «^ rH O
0 CM o
2! •  ID CO OOrH


, CM





ID ID
O CM o OOrHcncnoO
O ID rH ' • UD • t— 1 •' O
in rH OO
* . . . ^*



O)
c
t-  a) 4J
tOOJ CO)O}O) fl)f-.
a) -uai aiJT-i-nj nj"?, s-
•a 0)1— t=4J5-j= xrc: o
&- ox: jc o i — o) ai> XT
i- a) a) o t-+j +> £. x: E E o
ojoj'O'Oi — OQJ a>ouo o i — to 01
^$-EtI"5 ^2 °x:Eo ox? HJ Sc
4-> S-i — OJ Oi — S-r— -r- O) Xt Xt 0) E r— C N flj
fl^E>» LI O) OJ O L) M— O 1 — ft- 0) TD t- O CM O) XI 0) O
10 S- 4-> >,i— >,OX:e3S-CJrHOr— 0)5-!— OCM OOQ)S-r—
x: o a> x: >,x: <-> u i o i -xi X:NOX:E »' <-• a o >> •
•<->•— E4-> C-l-> O)T-rHi— CMrH S- O C i— CJ O rH 3: i— r— X?
oix:*!— o»*i— o»ot- «x: •• ~toM-o»x:i &. *>ooox:-fj











.
o>

Q.
Q
U)
i

tn
>»
"io
c
10
t/)

o
o
g
g
*•
10
+J



Ol
x:
0

. ^_
^!
t
tn
^^
IO
s.
D)
*|
O

tn
V)

nj
|
to
a
rH























































Q)

i
'S
o
z
II
g
(M
t-
(U

1
»r—
>
«j .
at
•S
m
XI
,-.
•r-
3:
c '
o
4-*

.**
jJ
C
Itf
3
cy

m
to
^s
0
^»
^J •
9) i .
>
•*•>
5'

15
13
O~

U)

c
0

LI
"
Q)
XI
•o
~
O

o (
JJ


,
I
n>

c .
to 4->
3 S-
cr o
Q.
4J Q)
O !-
Z
II *g
z"
z
II
a
z

-315-

-------
V)
o
8
31

§£
   UJ
u-s:
in  a.
z:  Q-
:*;=>
o o-

                  0)  C
co

 c

Qi
                  c

                  Of
                   o
                   a.
                   o
                  o
                            CM co H      CM co    IB r-- t~- oo    «o in o CM

                                     r-cM
                                                              55
                                                                                          o
                                                                                          o
                            CM O CT>      CO •*    CO CO rH LO    COrHr-lrHOr-linCn
O         00 CM       rH
co
                                             CO
                                             co
                                                                                          o
                                                                                          00
                                                                            V            r».
                         CM UD CO O    in CM in CM    ^* *T in

                                                                 o
                                                                 in












                                                   in rH         CD
                                     CO            CO            r-^

                                                                 rH






OinOrHCM^rHO^CMrHrHCMCMrHCOOOCOCOO^    |










   Ol-HrHin   rHi-H    CO CO 00       inOOO«d-C\)lf)inrH

OOi-HdcMrHinddindrHdrHCOrHOOOUSUSOrH    O
O>            r-4      in         i-H rH       ^                  J>j







      *^"



CM CM         rH      in         i-H CO               in         UD

      V                                                         ^*^
                                                                     S-    OJ
                                                                     a)    i—
                                                                    •^    >>
                           a>
                           c:
                           re ai
                          j= c
                          •p ai
                           
                             « 73
                             JC -r-
                             +J S-
                             >
                                                                           0)
                                                                           O
                              E +»
                             a E > Q
      r- S-    S-
      <(- O  E O
      O i—  S- r—
      S- J=  O -C
   0) O O t- U
 _ C I— •!-  O T-
r— o .c: ea  s- a
_; +J o i  o i
 U 
                                     •!-  O>
                                      S- 4->
                                     rH  o
                                       --Q
                                     I-H  S-
                                       ** re
                                     tH O
•P
(U


O



I
JD
O
t- QJ
O C
<— CO
J= N
U C
•r- 01
O CO
                                                 CO

                                                 O i
              U
        i—    re
         >,   s-
        ^   +J
        +J    d)
         a> e K-
         o £ i
         S. O CM
         O <*-
                                                          CD
                                                          c a)
                                                           c
                                                       CD -0 O>
                                                       COX)
                                          ;:cg*iss&s;
                                          • O  O rH 3C i— i— -C
                                          :  i   s-  -co o j= 4->
                                          I CM CO rH O I— O Ul
                                                 -316-

-------
TABLE 9.  PRELIMINARY MRI CONCENTRATIONS AS A PERCENT
          OF TOTAL HYDROCARBONS
THC Methane Total

Run 1
Run 3
Run 4
Run 5
Run 6
Averages:
Runs ,1&3
Runs 4-6
* All ppm
(ppm)* (ppm)* 5
7.6 1.7
6.2 1.3
8.8 4.3
145 93
106 51

6.9 1.5
87 49
units are as methane.
£ Total volatiles
(ppm)* % Total
22 0.58 8
21 0.23 4
49 1.1 13
64 0.58 0.4
48 0.84 0.8

22 0.41 6
56 0.85 1

Other
% Total
70
75
38
36
51

72
43

TABLE 10. PRELIMINARY PARTICULATE AND
. HC1 EMISSIONS







.Run Parti cul ate
(mg/m3 )
1 15.9
2 14.2
3 9.0
4 11. 1
5 23.6
6 35.5


HC1 HC1
emissions1 efficiency1
(kg/hr)
0.066 0.99981
0.074 0.99948
0.074 0.99956
0.11 0.99918
0.081 0.99963
0.11 0.99955







     1   Average of two values.
                        -317-

-------
                             INCINERATION OF CLEANUP  RESIDUES
                                FROM THE BRIDGEPORT RENTAL
                             AND OIL SERVICES SUPERFUND  SITE

                           Larry R. Waterland, Johannes  W.  Lee,
                           Robert W. Ross, II, Jerry  W.  Lewis,
                                   and Carlo Castaldini

                                    Acurex Corporation
                              Environmental  Systems Division
                               Combustion Research Facility
                                Jefferson, Arkansas  72079
                                         ABSTRACT

    Several PCB-contaminated wastes will  be generated through  remedial  actions  at the
Bridgeport Rental and Oil Services (BROS) Superfund site in Bridgeport,  New Jersey.  Among
these are a lagoon surface oil, an underlying sludge, and contaminated  soil.
Inclnerability testing of these three wastes plus a combination of the  soil  and sludge  was
performed at the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Combustion Research  Facility
(CRF) to determine whether thermal treatment via incineration  was a viable  treatment
option for these wastes.  Tests under three incinerator operating conditions  were
performed in the CRF rotary kiln incineration system for each  waste. Test  variables
included rotary kiln temperature and rotation speed (solids residence time) and
afterburner temperature.  All wastes contained between 100 and 300 ppm  polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) as Arochlor 1254.  PCB destruction efficiency (DE) was in  the  99.99 to
99.999 percent range for all tests.  All  scrubber blowdown samples had  nondetectable PCB
levels (<1 ppb) and hazardous constituent trace element concentrations  well below
extraction procedure (EP) toxicity thresholds.  Kiln ash samples for the soil,  sludge,  and
soil/sludge wastes were not PCB contaminated, having nondetectable PCB  levels (<0.4  ppm).
The composite kiln ash for the lagoon surface oil tests contained 2.6 ppm PCB.   EP
leachates of all kiln ash samples had hazardous constituent trace element concentrations
well below EP toxicity thresholds.
INTRODUCTION

     One of the primary functions of the
Combustion Research Facility (CRF) is to
support the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) Regional Offices in evaluations of
incineration as a disposal option for
wastes generated through remedial actions
taken at Superfund sites.  This  report
summarizes test results obtained during the
Incineration of hazardous wastes from the
Bridgeport Rental and Oil Services (BROS)
Superfund site located in Bridgeport, New
Jersey.  Several PCB-contaminated wastes
that will be generated from the  BROS site
are being considered for thermal treatment
using incineration.   Among these wastes  are
PCB-contaminated lagoon surface oil,  lagoon
sludge, and contaminated soil.   The primary
objective of the CRF tests was  to determine
whether these PCB-contaminated  wastes could
be treated via conventional incineration to
render them uncontaminated, while meeting a
PCB destruction efficiency (DE) of
99.9999 percent, as  mandated under the
Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA).
Emissions of products of incomplete
combustion (PICs) in the flue gas and the
EP toxicity trace element content of
incinerator residual streams were also
investigated.
                                           -318-

-------
APPROACH

     The CRF rotary kiln system, depicted
in Figure 1, was used to incinerate the
wastes during these tests.  The primary
rotary kiln chamber has a maximum design
temperature of about 900°C  (1,650°F) with a
nominal bulk gas residence  time of about
1.7 sec.  Further thermal treatment takes
place in the afterburner chamber which is
designed for a maximum temperature of
approximately 1,200°C (2,200°F) and a bulk
residence time of about 1.0 sec at a
typical excess oxygen level of 8 percent.
The air pollution control system consists
of a venturi and a packed column scrubber,
followed by a carbon adsorber and a high
efficiency particulate filter.

     Four waste materials were tested
during this program.  The chemical
composition and PCB and metals
concentrations of each waste material are
summarized in Table 1.  The lagoon surface
oil, a dark brown viscous fluid containing
some debris, was pumped in  the kiln via a
progressive cavity pump.  The sludge, a
black aqueous gel also containing much
  debris, was also fed into the kiln via the
  progressive cavity pump.  The contaminated
  soil, a clumped clay mud containing the
  most debris (rocks, grass, roots, twigs)
  was fed into the kiln using 5.7L (1.5 gal)
  fiberpacks via the available ram feeder.
  The mixture of sludge and soil was also fed
  in fiberpacks via the ram feed system.

       PCB contamination in these test waste
  materials ranged from about 100 mg/kg for
  the soil and soil/sludge mixture to nearly
  300 mg/kg for the lagoon surface oil.
  Highest concentrations of hazardous
  constituent trace metals were measured for
  lead (46 to 2,900 mg/kg).  Barium and
  chromium were also detected in each test
  material in the range of 12 to 1,030 mg/kg.
  Leachate analyses of each test material
  showed trace elements concentrations well
  below the EP toxicity limits.  Thus, these
  test materials would not be considered
  hazardous wastes under RCRA but, because of
  PC? contamination, they are considered
  hazardous under TSCA provisions.

       Table 2 summarizes the average
  incinerator conditions during each test.  A-
                            Venturi
                            inlet tluct
            Burner
            No. 2
            er~
    Propane -»•* •• I r


      Transfer    I
      duct
                                    flecirculation
                                    pumji
RecircuUtion     Rlpwilown   Rlowrtown
tank          tank     tant.
          .  No. 1     No. ?
                        Figure 1.  Rotary kiln incinerator system.
                                          -319-

-------

 •*• "* 1

 §o!
    O —
•  - > e
. <*._ 
-------
    TABLE 1.  BROS WASTE CHARACTERIZATION — COMPOSITION
Ultimate
analysis
(% by weight as fed)
C
H
0
N
S
Cl
Total
High heating value,
MJ/kg (Btu/lb)
Total PCBs
(mg/kg as Arochlor
1254)
Metals (mg/kg):
Arsenic, As
Barium, Ba
Cadmium, Cd
Chromium, Cr
Lead, Pb
Mercury, Hg
Selenium, Se
Silver, Ag
EP toxicity leachate
Arsenic, As (5.0)
Barium, Ba (100)
Cadmium, Cd (1.0)
Chromium, Cr (5.0)
Lead, Pb (5.0)
Mercury, Hg (0.2)
Selenium, Se (1.0)
Silver, Ag (5.0)
Area 1
soil
11.4
4.6
25.0
0.1
0.4
0.44
41.94

0
67.3-167
(110)a


<1
744
<1
55
756
<1
<1
<5
(mg/L):
<0.1
0.12
<0.1
<0.1
0.46
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Lagoon
surface
oil
54.4
10.9
29.9
0.1
0.7
0.1
96.1
8.62
(3,716)
270-300
(286)b


2
1,035
<10
46
2,888
<1
<1
<10

<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Lagoon
sludge
1.0
11.1
81.8
1.0
1.0
0.01
95.91
10.0
(4,348)

250


<1
23
<5
12
46
<1
<1
<5

0.19
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0,1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
Soil and
lagoon
sludge
13.1
4.7
32.2
0.4
0.01
0.06
50.86
2.43
(1,048)
78.6-170
(123)b


11
823
4
65
1,034
<1
<1
<5

0.1
0.30
<0.1
<0.1
0.12
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
^Average value of 9 analyses on 3 composite samples
"Average value of 3 analyses on 1 composite sample
                           -321-

-------
                            TABLE 2.   AVERAGE  TEST  CONDITIONS
Test
Lagoon surface oil
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Soil
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Soil plus sludge
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Sludge
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Feedrate
Feed method kg/hr (Ib/hr)
Progressive
cavity
pump
Flberpack
drum
ram-feed
Flberpack
drum
ram-feed
Progressive
cavity
pump
18 (39)
20 (45)
24 (53)
44 (98)
44 (96)
45 (100)
42 (92)
42 (92)
43 (95)
40 (88)
35 (78)
33 (72)
Kiln
Kiln
Afterburner
rotation
speed Temperature Exit 02 Temperature Exit 03
(rpm) °C (°F) (percent dry) °C (°F) (percent dry)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4.
0.4
0.4
0.4
667 (1,250)
677 (1,250)
893 (1,640)
927 (1,700)
700 (1,290)
888 (1,630)
715 (1,320)
800 (1,650)
893 (1,640)
654 (1,210)
882 (1,620)
654 (1,210)
12.6
10.4
10.3
8.2
10.3
8.8
13.1
NA
9.8
NA
NA
NA
1,140 (2,080)
1,210 (2,210)
1,130 (2,070)
1,130 (2,060)
1,130 (2,060)
1,120 (2,050)
1,120 (2,050)
1,120 (2,050)
1,120 (2,050)
1.120 (2,040)
1,130 (2,050)
1,210 (2,210)
. 5.6
6.0
6.5
8.0
7.2
6.7
8.5
7.5
6.8
10.1
6.2
6.2
total of 12 tests were performed, 3 for
each of the waste materials, with variable
kiln and afterburner temperatures, excess
oxygen levels, and kiln rotational speed.
The effect of maximum afterburner
temperature in combination with low kiln
temperatures was investigated during two
tests, one with the lagoon surface oil and
the other with the sludge as waste feed
materials.  All other tests were performed
with afterburner temperatures at
approximately 1,120°C (2,050°F).  Propane
was used as the primary fuel in both the
kiln and afterburner chambers to maintain
test temperatures.  An increase in excess
oxygen at the afterburner exit from 5 to
10 percent corresponds to an approximate
45 percent increase in gas flowrate at
constant temperature.  This increase in gas
flowrate translates to a corresponding
reduction in bulk gas residence time.

     Figure 2 illustrates the sampling
protocol used during these tests. Organic
compound emissions were measured at the
packed scrubber outlet location and
upstream of the carbon bed absorber, using
standard EPA methods  (2,4).  Particulate
mass and HC1 emissions were measured at
three locations, namely afterburner exit,
packed scrubber outlet, and stack, using
the EPA Method 5 modified for acid gas
(HC1) collection in the impinger section of
the sampling train (5).   The kiln  ash  and
scrubber blowdown were also sampled  for
priority pollutant metals and organic
contents. Analytical  methods conformed to
those prescribed-in References 1  and 3.

TEST RESULTS

     PCB destruction measured during these
tests generally ranged between 99.99 and
99.999 percent as illustrated in  Figure 3.
None of the test conditions investigated
resulted in a DE of 99.9999 percent
required under TSCA provisions for PCB
incineration.  Attempts to correlate DE
results with individual  process parameters
did not reveal any statistically
significant correlations.  However,  test
data illustrated in Figure 4 may  indicate
a tentative effect of reduced gas residence
time at temperature on measured DE.   In
this figure, the DE is plotted versus  a
mean gas temperature, defined by  the
arithmetic average of kiln and afterburner
temperatures, normalized by the gas
flowrate through the afterburner.  The
linear regression line shows a relatively
good fit (correlation coefficient = 0.82)
with increasing DE as temperature and gas
residence time increase.  Extrapolation of
the linear fit to 99.9999 percent DE would
indicate a gas flowrate requirement  of
about 1.2 m^/sec for a mean temperature of
                                          -322-

-------
   5 -

        Test 1

UCOON ML J771
          Test 2

          17771 SOCL+SUJDGE
               Figure 3.  PCB DEs.
  S9.9999


   99.999-



   99.99-


    99.9-



     99-


     90-
             Linear regression
             coefficient •= 0.8Z
       0.5 ,
                0.7
                         0.9
                      (Thousands)
                                  1.1
  Figure  4.
        (Tkiln * TAB)/acm/sec

PCB DE vs. temperature/flowrate
(°F/acm/sec).
  970°C  (1,780°F).   This gas flowrate
  corresponds  to a  residence time in the
  afterburner  of 2.0 sec or .about 2.3 times
  that recorded  during these tests.

      Table 3 summarizes the concentrations
  of most  common volatile organic compounds
  detected in  the waste feed materials.and
  the incineration,  effluents.  Flue  gas
  concentrations of individual  compounds were
  generally below 10 ug/dscm (approximately
  1 ppb).  Particulate mass and  HC1 emissions
  were measured  at  levels below those
  mandated by  RCRA  regulations  (180  mg/dscm
  corrected to 7 p,ercent 02 and, 1.8  kg/hr,
  respectively)  for all  tests as  shown in
  Table 4.  Highest particulate levels were
 recorded during incineration of
 contaminated soil.          "

      Table 5 summarizes the concentrations
 of most common trace elements detected in
 the kiln ash and its leachate and in the
 scrubber blowdown solids and liquids.  The
 kiln ash was found to contain barium,
 chromium, and lead in concentrations
 ranging from about 100 to 2,160 mg/kg.
 Lead concentrations in the kiln ash and
 blowdown solids for the soil and soil plus
 sludge tests clearly reveal  partitioning of
 this metal  to the flyash rather than the
 kiln ash.  The partitioning is not evident
 for the other metals.  Kiln leachate
 analyses and blowdown liquids  indicate
 concentrations typically less  than
 1  mg/L or well below the EP toxicity
 levels.

 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     This research  was performed under the
 Combustion  Research Facility operations and
 research contract  with  the U.S.
 Environmental  Protection Agency's  Hazardous
 Waste  Engineering  Research Laboratory.   The
 invaluable  assistance and guidance provided
 by  the EPA  Project  Officer,  Robert  ,
 Mournighan  are gratefully acknowledged.
 The authors  would  also  like  to thank Ronald
 Borsellins  of  EPA  Region II, and Henry
 Munoz  of the U.S.  Army  Corps of Engineers
 for  their significant contributions  to  this
 effort.

 REFERENCES

 1.   EPA,  1984.  Test Methods for
     Evaluating Solid Wastes:   Physical
     Chemical Methods.   EPA SW-846, 2nd,
    ed.,  Revised, U.S.  EPA, OSW,
    Washington, DC  20460,  April 1984.

2.  Hansen,  Earl M., 1984.  Protocol  for
    the Collection  and  Analysis of Vo 1 atfi 1 e
    POHCs Using VOST.   EPA-600/8^84Po6T;	
    U.S.  EPA, AEERL, Research Triangle
    Park, North Carolina 27711, March
    1984.

3.  Harris, Judith C., Deborah J. Larsen,
    Carl E. Rechsteiner, and Kathleen E.
    Thrun, 1984.  Sampling and Analysis
    Methods for Hazardous Waste~
    Incineration.  EPA-60~0/8-84~-002,
    U.S. EPA, AEERL, Research Triangle
    Park, North Carolina 27711, February
    1984.
                                           -323-

-------
                       TABLE 3.   MOST COMMON VOLATILE  ORGANICS
      Compound
1,1-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
1,2-dichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
1,2-dichloropropane
Trichloroethylene
Benzene
Hexane
Tetrachloroethylene H
  Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
                        Feed concentration  (ppm)
                       Scrubber exit flue gas concentration
                                    (pg/dscm)
Lagoon
surface
oil
4.7
27
16
68
4
21
3.7
23
ND


Sludge
ND
ND
14
63
25
12
2.1
6.0
16

Soil +
sludge
15
ND
59
57
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
Lagoon
surface
oil
ND
ND-5
5-31
6-76
ND
ND
ND-1,730
ND-6
2-7.5


Soil
ND-2.4
2.4-2.7
ND-16
4.4-17
ND
ND
0.7-1.4
0.6-3
7.4-17


Sludge
ND
5.8-9.2
ND
ND-5.1
0.7-1.4
2.1-3.5
6.5-8.4
2.2-9.3
ND-8.8

Soil +
sludge
ND
3.2-5.3
ND
14-18
ND
ND
1.2-2.0
1-1-0
2.0-6.6
44
4.7
5.1
2-10
                                    7-12    2.9-5.1   3.4-5.2
                  TABLE 4.  SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE AND HC1  EMISSIONS
Afterburner exit Scrubber discharge Stack
(Location 4) (Location 6) (Location 7)
Waste feedstock
Lagoon surface oil
Soil
Sludge
Soil plus sludge
Particulate
mg/dscma
8.30-17.9
(13.1)b
48.8-279
(126)
18.3-31.9
(27.1)
15.8-224C
(112)
HC1
mg/dscm
9.60-17.3
(13.2)
16.8-30.9
(21.9)
4.90-7.20
(5.90)
17.8-23.2
(20.6)
Particulate
mg/dscma
<0.2-0.5
(0.33)
9.70-16.9
(13.1)
4.70-8.00
(6.60)
9.30-124
(47.6)
Particulate
mg/dscma
NA
13.7-26.1
(19.4)
12.5-45.7
(23.6)
39.6-182
(129)
HC1
mg/dscm
NA
<9.6
• <9.8
<10.0
 aParticulate matter  concentration corrected to 7 percent plus 02
 ^Number  in  parenthesis  is the arithmetic average of three tests
 C0ata  suspect  due to unusually  high proportion of particulate catch in the probe rins

 NA --  Not available. Samples not taken.
                                         -324-

-------
                          TABLE 5.   TRACE ELEMENT CONCENTRATIONS
Test /sample
Lagoon Surface Oil
Composite
Composite kiln ash leachate (mg/L)
Average blowdown liquids (mg/L)a
Soil
Average kiln ash (ppm)a
Average kiln ash leachate (mg/L)a
Average blowdown solids (ppm)b
Average blowdown liquid (mg/L)a
Sludge
Composite kiln ash (ppm)
Composite kiln ash leachate (mg/L)
Average blowdown liquid (mg/L)a
Soil plus Sludge
Average kiln ash (ppm)a
Average kiln ash leachate (mg/L)a
Average blowdown solids (ppm)
Average blowdown liquid (mg/L)a
Arsenic

<2
0.33


<2
<60


<2


<2

<24

Barium

120
0.33
0.54

550
0.45
980
0.33

680
<0.1
0.41
740
0.32
820
0.37
Chromium

1,090
<0.1
0.16

130
100*
0.29

110
<0.1
0.17
87
<0.1
74
0.31
Lead

2,160
0.23
0.70
<
910
2,400*
1.3

800
0.12
<0.1
450
<0.1
5,010
0.12
        aAverage over three tests.
        ^Average over Tests 2 and 3 only.   Test  1  blowdown  contained no solids.

        Note:  EP toxicity limits are 5.0  mg/L for arsenic,  chromium and lead, and
               100 mg/L for barium.
4.  Schlickenreider, Lynn M., Jeffrey W.
    Adams, and Kathleen E. Thrun,  1975.
    Modified Method 5 Train and Source
    Assessment Sampling System Operators
    Manual.  EPA-60078-85-003, U.S. EPA,
    AEERL, Research Triangle Park, North
    Carolina 27711, February 1985.

5.  40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.
                                          -325-

-------
                  PILOT-SCALE  TESTING  OF  NONSTEADY  BOILER WASTE COFIRING

                  Howard B.  Mason,  Julie  A.  Nicholson, Carlo Castaldini,
                         Robert J.  DeRosier,  and  C.  Dean Wolbach
                                    Acurex Corporation
                            Mountain  View,  California  94043

                                          and
                                      Ivars  J. Licis
                            Environmental Protection Agency
                                 Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268


                                         ABSTRACT

     Waste destruction efficiencies were measured for  volatile and semivolatile
chlorinated organic compounds  cofired with gas, oil, and  coal  in  a pilot-scale boiler
simulator with a maximum capacity of 3 million Btu/hr.  The tests were run  to help
Interpret waste destruction data from 14 prior boiler  cofiring field test programs.
Specific issues addressed in the pilot-scale tests were:   what is the background  level  of
waste emissions due to residual deposition on boiler surfaces?; what operating conditions
fall to yield acceptable destruction efficiency?; what waste  products of incomplete
combustion are formed, and in what quantities?; and what  is the form and fate of  trace
metals contained in the waste?  Operating parameters varied were  excess 02; atomizatlon
patterns; residence time; firing rate; wall  cooling; and  waste or fuel flow transients.
INTRODUCTION

     Since 1981, the Environmental
Protection Agency  (EPA) has tested 14
Industrial boilers for performance in the
thermal destruction of hazardous wastes
cofired with conventional fuels (1).  The
test facility specifications and operating
conditions were selected to obtain a
reasonable coverage of the diverse range of
Industrial boiler  designs and operating
practices.  Field  test data were obtained
for the following  range of conditions:

     •   Flretube, package and field
          erected watertube designs; 0.3 to
          >2 seconds  residence time in main
          f1rebox

     •   2,500  to  350,000 Ib/hr steam
          capaci ty

     •   Gas, oil, coal, and wood  fuels
     •   Volatile and semivolatile  wastes
         with heating value from 0  to
         18,000 Btu/lb

     •   0 to 100 percent heat input from
         wastes

The results of these 14 tests showed an
overall mass weighted waste destruction
efficiency of 99.998 percent.  This high
level of destruction was generally
exhibited across the broad range of
designs, waste characteristics, and
operating conditions tested, and prevailed
even when the boilers were intentionally
operated in off-design upset conditions
such as substoichiometric air,
malfunctioning atomizers and waste flow
transients.  In fact, the destruction
efficiencies were uniformly so high that it
was not possible within the constraints of
plant  operation to identify the operational
boundary between acceptable and
                                           -326-

-------
  unacceptable destruction efficiencies.
  This remains an open issue.

       Within the context of these high
  destruction efficiencies,  several  patterns
  in the data recurred at most of the sites.
  Although the average destruction efficiency
  was nearly five nines,  the data did exhibit
  variability of up  to an order of magnitude
  which was apparently not due to artifacts
  in the sampling and  analysis scheme or to
  contamination.   Additionally,  the
  variations did not correlate with  any      '
  boiler operational setting or with boiler
  performance indicators  such as CO  or  NOX
  emissions, or  smoke.  It was  also  observed
  at several  sites that the  stack
  concentrations  of  waste  species  continued
  for several  hours  after waste  firing  was
  curtailed.   This hysteresis  effect may  be
  attributable to deposition  of  trace
  concentrations of waste species  on boiler
  surfaces,  particularly on areas with
  carbonaceous deposits from  oil or coal
  firing.                  •

      Soot  blowing,  the regular steam
 cleaning of the boiler heat transfer  "
 surfaces,  is a normal part  of boiler  '
 operation.  Limited data were obtained
 during the previous tests indicating that
 organics were present in higher-    "    '
 concentrations during the soot blow cycle.
 Only the gaseous portion'of the flue gas
 was analyzed due to the  characteristics of
 the sampling systems. Species and
 concentration of organics adsorbed on  the
 carbonaceous and solid materials being
 expelled during soot  blowing cycles were
 not determined.

      Other significant issues remained at
 the conclusion  of the 14 full-scale boiler
 tests.

      A  key issue is the  identification  of
 the form arid fate of  heavy  metals.'  Very
 little  data in this area has  been generated
 by  the  previous testing for  which the   •
 emphasis  was  destruction efficiency  (ORE).
 The effectiveness of  air pollution control
 devices  is  also not well  defined.

     A second/issue is the more complete
 identification of products of incomplete
 combustion  (PICs).  Several  tests showed   '
 PIC  emissions in boilers  a"s  a higher
 fraction of the organic constituents in the
 flue gas than those  in incinerators.  The
types and concentrations  of  PICs resulting
  from fuels in comparison to cofired waste
  have not been identified in sufficient
  detail.

       A third issue is the interpretation  of
  data from field tests in the presence of
  background variability and how this
  variability relates to the condition  of
  boiler heat exchange surfaces  and  operating
  conditions.  Some understanding of this
  issue is needed to gauge the confidence
  level  of conclusions to be reached
  regarding the relative insensitivity  of
  waste destruction to boiler operating
  conditions.

       The present  pilot-scale tests
  addressed the above  issues.  The
  pilot-scale approach was  selected over
  full-scale  testing for  a  number of  reasons.
  The  range  of  parametric  variation and
  degree of  off-specification operation
  envisioned  would  be difficult to achieve at
  full-scale  field  installations.
  Additionally, the experiments could be more
  closely  controlled at a test facility..
 There would also  be some cost saving's
  realized in conducting pilot-scale testing
 at a home facility as compared to
 maintaining a test team at a field
 facility.   /

 FACILITY  ''     .   •"     ' ' r  "         •'   •"

      The pilot-scale facility is a
 refractory-lined furnace and convective
 section designed with geometric similarity'
 and time-temperature simulation of  a
 tangentially or  wall-fi.red watertube boiler
 (Figure 1).   For the present tests,  the
 unit  was  fired in  the. wall-fired mode,'
 typically with gas, .oil,  or coal,fired
 through three  of the  burners  and a
 simulated waste  through'the remaining.'
 burner.   The fuel  feed  system,  cooliKg
 system, and  postcombustiori cleanup  system
 are shown schematically  in  Figure 2.   For
 most  tests,  the  unit was  fired at. a  firing
 rate  of 1.5  million Btu/hr which gives a
 residence  time in  the firebox prior to
 quenching  in the convective section of
 approximately  2  seconds.  The wall-fired
 burners were variable swirl "research
 burners equipped with a single fuel
 injector tube.  Combustion air is preheated
to 400°F upstream of the burner by an
electric heater.  For oil firing, 'steam
atomization is typically used, although air
atomization is available.  The convective
section consists of approximately 20 tube
                                          -327-

-------
                               Convective section
            Hot sampling ports
Heat exchange-*-^
tube bundles   V\
 Cold  sampling
 station
To baghouse-
                                      Ash pit
                         Figure 1*  Pilot-Scale Experimental Furnace
                                             -328-

-------
                                                          Ol
                                                          +J
                                                          01
                                                          o
                                                          t-
                                                          ia
                                                          0)
                                                          oj
                                                          O)


                                                          u
                                                         .•a:
                                                         a.
                                                         Ul
                                                         CM


                                                         0)


                                                         3
-329-

-------
bundle heat exchange drawers that are
cooled to about 300°F with Dowtherm.

     For oil firing, a 2.2-percent sulfur
residual oil with heating value of
18,300 Btu/lb was used for the three
burners fired on conventional fuel.  The
oil was heated to about 220°F by drum
heaters and heat traced recirculation
loops.  For coal firing, an Illinois No. 6
coal with a 3.6-percent sulfur content was
pneumatically conveyed to the burners.

     The synthetic waste fired through the
remaining burner was a blended mixture of
80 percent by weight No. 2 distillate oil,
and 5 percent each carbon tetrachloride,
trichloroethylene, monochlorobenzene, and
trichlorobenzene.  The mixture was
recirculated continually with a pump to
retard stratification, and fed t'o the steam
atomized burner at room temperature.  For
baseline testing in the absence of waste,
all four burners were fired on conventional
fuel.

     Thermocouples, sampling ports, and
viewports are positioned along the furnace
and convective  section.  Temperatures,
flowrates,  and  emission measurements are
recorded and processed  on a microcomputer
or data logger.  Continuous monitoring was
done  for 02» CO (two  scales), C02,
hydrocarbons, SQz, and  opacity.
      Volatile waste  constituents and PICs
 were sampled in  the  flue  gas with  the
 volatile  organic sampling train  (VOST).
 Two methods of using the  VOST were used.
 For periodic comprehensive quantification,
 the full -VOST  sampling protocol was used
 with GC/MS analysis  following thermal
 desorption.  To  reduce the cost and
 turnaround time  for  multiple samples,  a
 reduced protocol termed "mini VOST" was
 used.  The sampling  was done on  a  single
 VOST trap for  10 minutes  and the trap  was
 taken to a nearby gas chromatograph and
 desorbed to a  parallel flame ionization
 detector and a Hall  detector to  quantitate
 hydrocarbons and chlorinated species,
 respectively.   This  procedure  can  provide
 near real time feedback on volatile organic
 waste concentrations.

      Semivolatile wastes and products  of
 incomplete combustion were sampled by  a
 Modified Method 5 train fitted with an
 organics module containing 65  grams of XAD
 resin.  The train was typically run for
approximately 4 hours to a .total  sample
volume of 4.3 dscm (150 dscf).  The
expended XAD was Soxhlet extracted along
with other catches from the Method 5 and
analyzed with the GC/MS.

TEST PROGRAM

     To address the issues identified in
the Introduction, seven test series were
run as follows:

     I    Baseline — Fuel Only

     II   Baseline — Cofiring

     III  Data variability, replication,
          and hysteresis

     IV   Evaluation of high destruction
          efficiency operational window

     V    Form and fate of trace metals

     VI   Evaluation of PIC production

     VII  Confirmatory  tests

The Series  I and  II  baselines were  run to
obtain  reference  levels of waste and PIC
emissions under well controlled operation
and for a clean test facility.  Later  runs
as heat exchanger deposition  increases will
be compared to the baselines  to determine
possible background  and hysteresis  effects.
This  effect will  be  explored  in Series  III,
where a sequence  of  volatile  and
 semivolatile measurements will be  compared
to determine the  background levels  of  waste
and PICs and the  reproducibility  of the
waste destruction efficiencies.   With  the
 data  variability  established  and  some
 calibration made  on  the confidence  level,
 the  remainder  of  the testing  will  be on
 obtaining a data  base  on  waste emissions
 and  PICs and the  influence of operating
 conditions.  Series  IV will quantify the
 effect  of off-design and upset operation  on
 the  high destruction efficiency  window.
 Factors to be  tested include  low combustion
 air to  the level  of  smoking and  CO
 excursions; atomizer upsets;  and flow  or
 load transients.   Additionally,  wall
 cooling and lower residence times via
 capacity increases  will be evaluated.   In
 Series  V, trace metals will  be injected
 into the flame and the concentrations  will
 be determined upstream and downstream of
 the baghouse as a function of particle
 size.  Series VI will  test the influence  of
                                            -330-

-------
waste identity on the concentration and
identity of PICs.  Inorganic chlorides will
be used in place of the waste to determine
if waste identity is dominant in PIC
production.  Finally, Series VII will test
specific conditions found from the Series I
to VI results to have a strong effect on
waste or PIC emissions.
REFERENCES

1.  Castaldini,  C., et.  al.   "Engineering
    Assessment Report:   Hazardous  Waste
    Cofiring in  Industrial  Boilers,"  Final
    Report TR-84-159/EE  on  EPA
    Contract 68-02-3188,  Acurex
    Corporation,  Mountain View,  California,
    June 1984.
                                         -331-

-------
         TECHNICAL/ECONOMIC  ASSESSMENT  OF  SELECTED  PCB DECONTAMINATION  PROCESSES

                                    Ben H. Carpenter
                               Research Triangle  Institute
                      Research Triangle Park,  North Carolina 27709

                                           and

                                    Donald L.  Wilson
                          U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency
                     Hazardous Waste Engineering  Research Laboratory
                                 Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268


                                        ABSTRACT

    Eleven emerging alternative treatments for Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) contaminated
sediments have been compared and ranked using technical  performance  status of develop-
ment; test and evaluation data needs, and cost as factors.  In ranking the processes,
weights were assigned the factors to emphasize the extent of decontamination, the esti-
mated cost of treatment, and the versatility of the process.  The emerging treatment proc-
esses are based on five different technologies:  one on low-temperature oxidation, two on
chlorine removal, one on pyrolysis, four  on removing and concentrating, and three on
fdcroorqanlsms.  Types of technologies not developed are chlorinolysis, stabilization, and
enzymes:  On the basis of the comparisons made, the treatment processes were ranked in the
following order from highest to lowest:   KPEG, LARC, Acurex, Bio-Clean, Supercritical
Water, Advanced Electric Reactor, Vitrification,  OHM Extraction, Soilex, Composting, and
Svbron B1-Chem 1006.  The first eight processes show potential for reduction of PCB con-
centrations to the desired  background  levels  (1 to 5 ppm) or less, with minimum environ-
mental impacts and low to moderate  cost.  All the technologies except,the advanced elec-
tric reactor required further development and testing.
 INTRODUCTION

     The  PCB contamination  problems  in  the
 Hudson River  and New Bedford,
 Massachusetts are reported to  be among the
 worst in the  United States in  terms of
 concentration and total  quantity of PCB's.
 It 1s estimated that 290,000 kg of  PCB's
 are contaminating 382,000  m3 (500,000  yd*)
 of sediments  of the Hudson River.  During
 the 70s, approximately 907,000 kg of PCBs
 were used in  the New Bedford area annual-
 ly, of which  an estimated 45,500 kg were
 improperly disposed.  The PCB contamina-
 tion problems pose threats to both drink-
 Ing water and the fishing industry.  There
 are also numerous industrial lagoons con-
 taminated with large quantities,of PCBs.
    The only available proven technology
is dredging and expensive incineration.
Land disposal of the sediments untreated
has legal restrictions.  Biodegradation  is
a possibility, but sufficient information
does not exist to design and operate such
a system.  There is little experience in
the application of encapsulation tech-
nology to PCB-contaminated sediments.

    This study was undertaken to identify
the most technically feasible processes
that have been proposed by research
concerns for  the removal of  PCBs from
sediments; to identify their extent of
development,  effectiveness,  limitations
and probable  costs; and to determine needs
for further  development.   The  study in-
volved four  phases:  data acquisition,
                                             -332-

-------
  screening and'selection of the most tech-
  nically feasible processes,  development of
  criteria for process  assessment,  and proc-
  ess  assessment.

  DATA ACQUISITION

      Three major  sources of data were:
  EPA's  file of proposals and  correspondence
  concerning problems of  PCB contamination
.and  possible  approaches to alternative
  solutions; the open literature; and  direct
  contacts  with proponents of  treatment
  technologies.

     A bibliography (171 references) was
 prepared, which  included treatment
 feasibility study reports, process test
 and evaluation reports, process develop-
 ment proposals,  and patents.  As processes
 were Identified,  direct contacts were made
 with the  investigators  for details of
 their process studies.

 SCREENING AND SELECTION OF MOST
 TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE PROCESSES

     Alternati ve  destructi on/detoxi f1ca-
 tion/removal  (DDR) processes were  subject-
 ed to screening  to identify those  to be
 assessed further.  The processes were
 categorized according  to their generic
 technology so that their potential perfor-
 mance could be judged  appropriately.
 Processes with undesirable aspects were
 rejected from further  assessment.   For
 example, lack of  tolerance for water by a
 process is undesirable because extensive
 sediment drying is required.   Processes
 showing insufficient tolerance for water
were  therefore rejected  from  further con-
 sideration as  a primary  treatment  process
 in  favor of more  tolerant  alternatives.

    Table  1 lists the  processes  screened,
identifies those  selected  for further  ,
assessment and gives the reasons for
rejection  of the  rest.   Some  of  the tech-
nologies  (e.g. nucleophilic substitution)
have provided several processes.  Some
(e.g. enzymes) have not  yet provided any
processes.  A process evaluated as "1" in
Table 1 was selected for further assess-
ment.  Other evaluation  numbers assigned
to the rest of the screened processes
refer to footnotes that  identify the
reason for rejection of the process for
further assessment.  References cited are
identified fully  in the bibliography.
   DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR PROCESS
   ASSESSMENT

       The  PCB contamination  problem in  the
   Hudson River is  representative  of the type
   of PCB destruction/detoxification problems
   focused  on  in this  study.   It is  expected
   that the contaminated  sediments will  have
   to be dredged from  all  sites and  that the
   dredged  sediments will  have high  water
   content.

       Criteria  for assessment of  alternative
   treatments were chosen which relate to a
   broad range of principles of operation of
   diverse  applied technologies, yet can be
   used effectively in comparing one treat-
   ment process with another.  Additional
   factors,  specific to a technology, were
   included to help portray the inherent
   strengths and limitations of a process.
   Table 2 lists the seven criteria used in
  comparative process evaluation and three
  additional factors relating to the needs
  for further process development  and evalu-
  ation.  The table also includes  an overall
  description of the findings for  the proc-
  esses evaluated.

      The goal set  for process performance
  is to reduce the  PCB concentration in
  treated sediments to levels of 1 to 5  ppm.
  Several of the processes were found to
  meet this goal.  Those that showed reduc-
  tion to less than 2  ppm were assigned  a
  rating of "6". Those that  attained a
.level between 2 and  10 ppm  were  assigned a
  "4".  Those  with  residual concentrations
  greater than 10 ppm  were rated "2".

      Available capacity was  found not to
  exist for any of  the processes.  However,
  several were  developed  sufficiently  to
  permit projections of  the time required  to
  build a facility  for application of  the
  treatment.  Those for which such projec-
  tions  could not be made were rated  "2".
  Those  requiring 24 or more months were
  rated  "4".  Those requiring 12 to 16
 months were rated "6".

     Conditions/limitations that were rated
 were tolerance for water, required proc-
 essing time, and controllability  of proc-
 ess conditions.  Those treatments that
 could tolerate water up to about  40 per-
 cent would not require a drying step with
 its attendant fines'  control  problems.
 Those requiring only  1 day for treatment
                                           -333-

-------
                                         TASLE 1.  SCREENING OF PCS TREATMENT PROCESSES
     Generic
    technology
              References
                                                      Process
                                                                                   Evaluation3
CHEMICAL

General
Low-tepperature oxidation

  Hat air oxidation
Centofanti 1971;  Chan 1982; Childs  1382;
Craddock 1982; Edwards etal.  1982;
Envircnrant Canada 1933;  Homig  1984;
tossey and Walsh 1985; Rogers'and Komel
1985; Rogers 1983; Rogers 1985.
Baillcdetal. 1978;  Miller and
Sevientonievski (n.d.); Miller and Fox
1982.
   Supercritical water oxidation  Model 1 et al. 1982.

   Chemical oxidants              FMC Corporation (n.d.).
   Ozcnation


 Chlorine recoval

   Oehydrochlorination
 Arisman et al.  1981; Lacy and Rice
 Deschlaeger  1976; Prengle and Mauk 1978.

 U.S.P. 4,469,661

 Ctu and Vick 1985;  Lapiere et al. 1977.
   Reducing agents
 Chu and Vick 1985; Sworzen aid Ackerman  1982.
    Nucleophilic substitution
 Brovn et al. 1985a; Srunelle and Singleton
 1985; terch 1968; New York University 1984;
 Rozz et al. 1985; Smith and Gurbachsn 1981;
 Sunohio (n.d.); Sweeny and Fischer 1970;
 United States Patent Office 1984b; Weitzman
 1984; Weitzman 1984; Weitzman 1985.
Uncatalyzed, general                      2
Zimpro Process, Santa Maria,             4,13
    CA Waste Site
Catalyzed
  Dow Chemical Co. Patent 3,984,311       2
  IT Environmental Science'               2

Modar                                     1

Potassium permanganate plus Chromic
  Acid and Nitric Acid                   6
Chloroiodides                            4,7
Ruthenium tetroxide                     3,4,8

G£ UV/ozonation process                  2
 Molten aluminum/distillation             14

 Catalytic:                               2,3
   Nickel  on kieselguhr                   2,3
   Pd on charcoal                         2,3
   Lithium aluminum hydride               2,3
   Butyl lithium                         2,3
   Raney Nickel                           2,3

 Sodium in liquid  ammonia             •    7,9
 Nickel-catalyzed  zinc reduction          7,9
 Hydrazine                               7,9
 UV light  plus hydrogen                    2
 Mildly acidic zinc powder,
   Sweeney and Fisher (1970)              2,14

 Sodium-based processes:
   Goodyear, sodium in naphthalene (1980) 10
   Acurex, proprietary solvent            10
   PCBX/Sun Ohio                '         10
   PPM                            '-       10
   Ontario Hydro Power                    10
                                                                                                                      (continued)
                                                              -334-

-------
                                                         TABLE 1 (continued)
Generic
technology
Nucleophilic substitution
(continued)




Radiant energy




References





Bailin and Hertzler 1977; Sailin and
Hertzler 1378; Bailin et al. 1978;
Craft etal. 1975; Oevetal. 1985;
• Kate et al. 1981; Meuser and Weimer 1982;
Plimer 1978; Rogers and Komel 1985;
Rogers 1985; Trump et al. 1979; West et al.
1983. .,

Process
Potassium poly (ethylene glycolate)
based:
EPA In-house KPE8
KPB3 Terraclean-CI
SEKOH-PES
New York University KPEG
UV/photolysis
Syntax photolytic
Thermal corona glow
Microwave plasma
RF insitu heating
Gama radiation (Craft et al. 1975)
LARC
Evaluation9

19
1
11
12
3
3,4
5
9,17
18
9
1
   Electromechanical reduction     Massey and Walsh 1985.

 Cjilorinolysis                     Sworzen and Ackerman 1982.
Pyrolysis
PHYSICAL
Removing and concentrating
                                   Boyd  1985; New York State Department of
                                   Environmental Conservation 1985a; New
                                   York State Oepartnsit of Environmental
                                   Conservation 1985b.
 Angiola and Soden 1982; Caron  1'985; Gilmer
 and freestone 1978;  Githens  1984; Hancher
 et al.  1984; Hawthorne 1982; Lee et al.
'1979; Saunders 1985; Schwirn et al. 1984;
 Versar,  Inc. 1984.
                                                 Electromechanical research process       14

                                                 Hoechst process                         .  9
                                                 Gocdyear catalytic hydrogenolysis         9
                                                , Exhaustive chlorination                   9

                                                 Advanced Electric Reactor                 1
                                                 Wright-Malta alkaline catalyst fuel-gas
                                                   process                                u
  Heated Air Stripping

  Extraction
 Adsorption


 Vitrification
                                 TiirnErraan 1985.
                                                American Toxics Disposal, Inc.           i«

                                                Critical Fluid Systems, COj              14
                                                Furfural                                 15
                                                Acurex solvent wash                       1
                                                0.  H. H. extraction                       1
                                                Soilex process                            \

                                                Carbon adsorption,  general                13
                                                Neoprene rubber .adsorption                15

                                                Sattelle vitrification  process             1
                                                                                                                     (continued)
                                                            -335-

-------
                                                      TABLE 1  (continued)
Generic
technology
Stabilizing
References
Ghassemi and Haro 1985; Law Engineering
Testing Coipany 1982; Stroud et al. 1978;
SutnacBnian and Rahalingam 1977; Tittlebaun
et al. 1985.
Process
Asphalt with lime pretreatment
Z-Lnpremix
Sulfur-asphalt blends (K-20)
Ground freezing
Evaluation3
16
15
16
13
Bottora
BIOLOGICAL

  HicrooroanisES
 Erayces
Carich and Toffleraire 1983; Hand and Ford
1978; Murakami and Takeishi 1978; U.S. Array
Corps of Engineers teter Resources Support
Carter 1983; Ziimrie and Tofflanire 1978.
Bedard et al. 1985; Bumpus et al.  1985;
Clark et al. 1979; Oawes and Sutherland
 1976; Furakawa 1982; Isbister et al.  1984;
 Kong and Sayler 1983; HcCoraick 1985;

 New York State Department of Environmental
 Conservation 1985a; New York State Depart-
 ment of Environmental Conservation 1985b;
 Rhee et al.  1985b;  Rhee et al. 1985;
 Untenran et al. 1985.

 Catelani et  al. 1971; Rochkind et al.
 Merman et  al. 1985.
                                                                                Dredging
Bio-Clean
Sybron Bi-Chsm 1006 P6
Composting
Bio-Surf

Ecolotrol, Inc.
Wormes Biochemical's Phenobac
Rhee anaerobic degradation
                                                                                 No processes found.
                                                                                                                         13
   1
   1
   1
 4,13

 4,13
11,13
  14
 ^Explanation of process rating:

    1.   Identified emerging ssdieent treatment process.

    2.   Destruction efficiency appears to be too low to meet environmental goals.

    3.   Processing tine appears to be extremely long for  practical timely cleanup.

    4.   Data availabla for dioxin, other chlorinated compounds, or other contaminants, hut not PCB's.

    5.   Process has  been  show to destroy PCB's in gas streams only.  It may be feasible for sediments,  but has not been show to
        be.

    6.   PCB's with 5-7 chlorine  atcois per molecule are not destroyed.

    7.  Products of partial degradation may be toxic.

    8.  Reagent fe very costly/toxic or both.

    9.  Process costs appear to be excessively high compared with other emerging  treatment processes.
                                                               -336-

-------
 10.   Water destroys the reagent or interferes with its action, thus the process would require excessive drying of sediitents and.
      probably,  extraction in pretreatments.  The process would therefore haw application only as a subordinate final step to
      several  extraction and concentration operations.


 11.   This  particular process was not evaluated because data were not available for assessment.

 12.   This  process  is an alternative to another process using the sane generic technology, but it is in very early stages of
      development, and data  were  not available for assessment.


 13.   This  technique is  basically applicable to preliminary operations prior to treatment or to treatment of wastestreans (e g
     vastewaters) from  chemical or physical treatments.


 U.   This  process is in the concept stage and data are insufficient  to assess  it for PC8-«ntanrinated sediments.

 15.  This process has been found to be ineffective.


 16.  This technology provides only for encapsulation  of the PCS-caitaminated sediments.

 17.  This process supports incineration of  PCS's.

 18.  The process does not appear to be feasible for submerged sediments.

19.  Basic data support to identify emerging treatment process.
                                                         -337-

-------







UTBRIA AND TECHNICAL FACTORS USED IN PROCESS ASSESSMENT
tj-i
o
CS3
Cd
trt
S3
£-«






















Description









£4
Q
^J

1*4
(0
^*
cd
*^i
CD
4J
•*-{
f-j
0



C
•pHj
(1)

0 >>
•p
rt
o*
 P CU U
C X Ll -H
o co p bo
0 • 0

co
p
•H
B
•H f

^ —
tfi
a
o
P
73
o
u









cesses required more than 3 weeks. • -






















o
o
o
CO
o
4J
O
.§•.
The PCB concentration of the sediments treated ranged from u
ppm. Some processes had limits inherent in the technology.

73
CU
pH
73
a
cs
;•
cu •
bo bo
RI a
JJ -H ,
CO P
CO
P CU
a p
cu .
o 
CD
Q

 CO
Ed 73
CU
73 CU
d 23
Rt
Rl
P P
CO 19
0, 0


1
CO -H
O P 73
•H CO CU
^ O CO
3 O
O 73
CO CU
Li 3 P
(U rH Rl
o< a cu
P - p
coco
0 6 •, o
The estimated costs of treatments were made in terms of the
meter of dry sediment treated, assuming a density of 1.68 Mg
of associated operations-dredging, transportation, handling
ments, as required. All costs are stated in 1985 dollars.









.p
CO
o
0

73
CD
P
id
•H
p
10
Ed

73

-------








































•5

3
e
•H
P
s
o
o
"~*

•
CV1

w
1































































e .
0
•^
a
•H
LI
o
CO
cu
a





























LI
o
.u
o
(8
to
(8
•»-l
Li
CU
•H
Ll
u



e
o
.P
(8
CU N
P] •*•)
•M t<
CD
- P
CO U
p ce
C Li
CU (8
M J3
C8 U

CU 0)
> -p
•rt CU
•P i-H
u a
(8 g
o
CD O
3,
e
to a

•a c
3 0
r-l -H
U P
13 0
•rt 3
- -P
T3 CO
CU CD
.0 TJ
•H
LI oa
0 0
CO Ou

T3 4~*
o
CO
C8 co
- . x e
to •
>> -rt CO
So e c
o ce o
i-H >13 !rt
O O 4J
C 01 18
J3 S L,
O CD
cu -a a
P C O
C8
co P
CO CO -rt
cu cu e
O -H S
o a,
Ll «rt .-1
ft 0 rt
C C8
CD -rt

e-i a o










CO
13
O
•H

L!

o1
Li ^
0 -H
o B

CQ





CO
p
e
cu
s
p
C8
CU
Li
•P

CU
si
p

g
0
L>
>
^ C
cu cu
•H *H
f£3 O
O -rt
(8 

CD CO — - CO 06 cu •^ u o o ^ ft "^^ CU -H • X! 18 p > o i— 1 CD < tl u c cu •rt o •rt Ed ^£ \ Q \ Q •d cu •rt +J 00 -339-


-------
could generally show a faster rate of
cleanup than those requiring 3 days.  Some
biological processes required more than 3
weeks.  The treatments generally provided
control of the processing conditions;
however, a few (e.g., composting) would
not necessarily do so.  The three condi-
tions/limitations were ranked as follows:
      Conditions/limitations         Rank

Tolerates to 40 percent water and
   treats in 1 day                     6
Sediment needs to be dried             5
Tolerates to 40 percent water and
   treats in 3 days                    4
Tolerates water and treats in >3
   weeks                               3
Sediment needs to be dried, treats
   in >3 weeks                         2
Processing conditions uncontrollable   1
    Concentration range handled in data
developed for the processes ranged from
unknown to 3,000 ppm.  Ratings were
assigned based on the upper limit of feed
concentration.  The ratings were as fol-
lows:
PCB concentration treated, ppm       Rank

        ;>3,000                         6
        2,000 to 3,000                 5
        1,500 to 2,000                 4
        500                            3
        250 to 350                     2
        Unknown                        1
    Status of development ratings were "1"
for no data, "2" for laboratory-scale
tests completed, "3" for bench-scale tests
completed, "4" for pilot-scale tests com-
pleted, "5" for field tests completed; and
"6" for commercial system designed and
ready for construction.

    Test and evaluation data needs could
be rated differently, depending upon the
purpose.  For indicating the extent to
which a treatment process is readied for
use, the more data that are available the
better.  For indicating the need to sup-
port a very promising technology that
lacks sufficient progress, the potential
and the data needs should be rated in
combination.  The ratings used here are
for the former purpose and are as follows:
Test and evaluation data needs      Rank

None except permits and checkout      6
Field tests                           5
Pilot tests and costs                 4
Laboratory and bench tests            3
Conceptual treatment process design   2
D/D/R data, residual PCB data,
   RCRA waste data                    1
    The application of any treatment proc-
ess can involve the need for one or more
of the following unit operations:
dredging, transport, storage, landfill
disposal, land treatment disposal,  incin-
eration, and/or alternative treatment.
Estimates were developed for all of these
so that, in any given process evaluation,
the proper elements could be added  to
obtain an estimate of the cost of applica-
tion.  The estimates were made in terms of
the cost per cubic meter of sediment
treated.  The sediment was assumed  to have
a density of 1.68 Mg/m3.

    Dredging costs for those treatments
requiring removal of the sediment before
treatment are estimated at $20/m3 based on
the recent experience of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers in contracting for
dredging in the New York State area
(Wheeler, 1986).

    Transport costs are given as a range.
The Corps' experience is $13/m3 for short
hauling distances  (Wheeler, 1986).   A cost
of $126/m3 was used for long hauling dis--
tances, which represents an assumed 483-km
average transport distance to RCRA land-
fills capable of accepting PCB-
contaminated wastes  (Industrial Economics,
Inc., 1985).

    Storage cost will sometimes be in-
curred to hold the dredged sediments pend-,
ing treatment; e.g., where dredging rates
exceed the rates at which the treatment
can be applied.  These have been set
arbitrarily at $10/m3.

    Land treatment was used in one of the
processes to degrade residual solvent left
in the soil after treatment.  This in-
volves the controlled application of
                                           -340-

-------
 wastes to the surface of the soil.  At
 land-treatment facilities,  wastes are
 either spread on or injected into the
 soil,  followed by tilling into the soil
 with farm equipment.   The physical and
 chemical  properties of the  soil,  in unison
 with the  biological component of the soil
 and sunlight work together  to immobilize,
 degrade,  and transform portions of the
 wastes.   The application and tilling proc-
 ess can be repeated many times on the same
 plot,  making land treatment a dynamic
 system designed to reduce and ultimately
 eliminate a portion of the  waste, as
 opposed to permanent  storage such as land-
 fills.

     The American Petroleum  Institute
 (1983) has reported that there were 213
 land-treatment facilities in operation
 handling  waste from 16 different  industry
 sectors.   The most extensive use  of land
 treatment is for petroleum  refinery
 wastes, with 105 land-treatment facili-
 ties,  many of which are located on the
 same site as the refinery.   More  recently,
 EPA verified the existence  of 114 land-
 treatment facilities  and obtained informa-
 tion on operating parameters at some of
 these  sites (Thorneloe,  1986).

     Wastes are typically mixed  to a depth
 of  0.5 to 1.0 feet, where biochemical
 reactions take place.   Application fre-
 quencies  can range from daily to  yearly,
 with tilling occurring as frequently as
 daily.

     The average  cost of controlled,
 managed land treatment cited by the
 American  Petroleum Institute, $60/ton,
 equates to  $lll/m3  of  sediments.   For
 short-term  land  treatment of readily-
 degradable  solvents remaining in  treated
 sediments  free of  PCBs  after they  are
 washed or dried, the cost is estimated at
 $33/m3 (Cap!an,  1986).

     Redeposition costs of decontaminated
 sediments were also estimated at $33/m3.
 Slightly lower costs might be expected in
 special cases.

    Because the regulations permit the use
of incineration or chemical  waste landfill
and the application costs of these two
methods are available from firms engaging
 in their practice, these costs were used
as lower and upper limits with which to
 compare the costs of applying new alterna-
 tive technology.

     Landfill  disposal  costs,  incurred when
 the sediments must be  placed  in authorized
 chemical  waste landfills,  are estimated  as
 ranging from  $260/m3 for the  Michigan area
 (EPA Regional  Office)  to $490/m3,  based  on
 the highest prices charged for hazardous
 wastes  by commercial facilities (Indus-
 trial  Economics, Inc.,  1985).  This  range
 includes  an intermediate value of $420/m3
 reported  by the Corps  of Engineers.

     Costs for incineration techniques
 capable of achieving 99.9999  percent
 destruction and removal  efficiencies for
 PCBs are  difficult to  predict.   Even more
 difficult is  prediction  of the price com-
 mercial facilities will  charge to  accept
 the responsibility of  handling such  a
 sensitive waste.  Surveys  made to  deter-
 mine the  likely charges  to incinerate
 dioxin-containing wastes resulted  in a
 reported  price on the  order of $l,000/Mg
 (Pope-Reid Associates  1985).  This  trans-
 lates to  $l,680/m3,  the  value adopted for
 this evaluation, and the cost of disposal
 of residue from incineration  is included.
 The total  cost of use  of incineration
 including dredging at  $20/m3  and transport
 at $13  to $126/m3 is $1713 to $1826/m3.

     When  available,  alternative treatment
 costs were obtained  from the  proponent of
 the process.   Otherwise, they were esti-
 mated based on the types of unit processes
 involved  and the environmental  controls
 required,  or they were determined not  to
 be estimable considering the  status  of
 development of the process.

     While  all   costs  are  in  1985  dollars,
 the  treatment  costs  are  not all  neces-
 sarily based upon  the same  labor rates,
 corporate  fixed  charges, or profit.  These
 costs vary  from  one  firm to another.   The
 cited estimates  are  costs of purchasing
 the  treatments.   Further cost analyses
will be needed to provide a basis for
comparison of processes on the basis  of
individual cost elements.

    Table 3 shows the unit cost estimates
used to develop cost ranges for the
emerging treatments.

    Estimated  costs were rated by compar-
ing the range  of the cost estimates
                                          -341-

-------
r
                            TABLE 3.  UNIT COST ESTIMATES  FOR STEPS  INVOLVED IN TREATMENT
                                      AND DISPOSAL OF  PCB-CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS
                                      Operation
Cost,
                                Dredging
                                Transport
                                Storage
                                Landfill and Disposal
                                Landfarming
                                Restricted Land Disposal
                                Incineration
     20
  13 to 126
     10
 260 to 490
     33
    111
   1680
                                                           -342-

-------
 obtained  with  the cost of placing theni
 into  a chemical  waste landfill.   Treatment
 processes showing the-lowest estimated   •••
 cost  range were  rated '"6";  those showing a
 probable  cost  Tower than  landfill  were
 rated "4";  those showing  an estimated  cost
 equal  to  landfill  were rated "2";  and
 those showing  an estimated  cost  range
 greater than landfill  were  rated "1".

    Overall ranking was accomplished
 through the use  of weighting factors
 assigned  to each rated factor.   The
 weighted  average rank was then obtained  by
 summing the products of the weighting
 factors and the  ratings and dividing by
 the sum of the weighting  factors.  The
 weighting factors  were:
         Factor                     Weigti

Residual  PCB concentration             5
Capacity                              2
Conditions/limitations                 3
Concentration range  handled            2
Status of development                  2
Test and evaluation  data  needs         1
Estimated costs                        4
    The weightings  tend  to  give  greatest
emphasis to the  ability  of  the treatment
to reduce the  PCBs  and to the probable
cost of the treatment.   Much less  emphasis
is placed on the status  of  development.
Thus, an almost  fully developed  process
with an extremely high cost would  be rank-
ed lower by application  of  the weighting
process than a less developed process with
a much lower potential cost.  Test and
evaluation data needs have  not been
heavily weighted because nearly  all the
alternative treatment processes  that show
low potential cost require  more  data to be
proven.

    Under this procedure, the perfect
process for treating PCB-decontaminated
sediments would show the following levels
for each ranking factor and would receive,
using the ratings given,  a weighted rating
of 6.0:
 Factor level
Rating, R  Wt  R x Wt
• 1.  Residual PCB,  - ':-  •-   "
     treated sediment
    " less than 1" ppm:   '  ., 6
                     ) -  ,'  , ,
 2.  Capacity adequate1'
     for site, cleanup,  :
     available in
     12-16 mo. ' .  " ''  '-  --.; 6

 3.  Tolerates to 40  '"'  '
    "percent water' and '"
     treats in 1 day
     (24 hr)               6

 4.  Handles concentra-
     tions greater
     than 3,000 ppm        6

 5.  Commercial  system
     designed and ready
     for construction      6

 6.  No test and evalu-
     ation data needs
     except permits and
     checkout              6

 7.  Lowest estimate cost
     range among
     alternative emerging
     technologies          6

 Total  R x Wt       E R x Wt

 Weighted rating (E R x Wt)/EWt

 PROCESS ASSESSMENT
                  30
                  18
                                                                                       12
                  12
                  24

                 114

                  6
     The  processes  were  assessed  by  charac-
 terization  and  ranking.   Characterization
 provided for objective  comparison of  the
 processes.  Ranking provided  a subjective
 comparison  of the  processes based on  the
 seven criteria.

 CHARACTERIZATION

     Table 4 summarizes  five characteris-
 tics of  the processes:  unit operations,
 available capacity, conditions/limita-
 tions, concentration handled, and any
 generated RCRA wastes.  The unit opera-
 tions employed are given, and each  is
 identified by a number.  Generally, a
 greater  number of  unit operations will
 mean a greater effect on treatment  costs.
                                          -343-

-------
                                            TA8LE4.  TR&WENT PROCESS ASSESSMENT
     Process
      Unit
   operations
 Available
 capacity
 (or time
to provide)
                                                                            Candidas
                                                                            and limits
Concentration
   handled
   RCRA
   waste
 generated
Cheaical
Supercritical wt«r oxidation         1,4,10
KPEG, Terraclean-a
       1,3,4,7           (24 no)
                                          20-40% solids; 374 °C,      >3000 ppm
                                          23.3 HPa organic
                                          content >5% or supple-
                                          mental fuel
                    150 °C, 0.5-2 h
  500 ppm or
  greater
                                                                                                                      Here
w.w.tr.
act.
carbon
 KPS3, m


 KP6B, EPA in-house

 URC

 Advanced electric
   reactor (l.H. Huber)

 Physical

 0. H. teterials
   nathanol extraction
 'Soil ex* keroseneAater
 Acurex solvent wash
 Vitrification
    1.2,3.4,5,
    6,7,9

Basic process data

     1,2,5,15,

     7,8,12.13
     14
      2,7.8,14
      15
      1,2,5,15
      2,4,5.6,
      10.11
      8.12,14
 (24 nx>)            tolerates  25% water.      480 ppm

 (16 no)            2204 "C, 2.400 WSVm3     >3000 ppm
                    heeds predryer
                    predry to <1% moisture    >4flO ppra
                    251 of kerosene sol-     to 350 ppm
                    vent retained in soil;    tested
                    3 d per batch
                    3-12 washes, tolerates   up to  1,983
                    <40% water.              ppm
                    Electrical power usage    500  ppm
                    increases with soil
                    moisture; submerged
                    sediments dredged
                    and treated
                       Ncne

                       toe
                     PCfi-'oaoed
                     carton from-
                     solvent
                     cleanup

                     Concentrat-
                     ed PCS from
                     still to
                     incinera-
                     tion

                     Concentrat-
                     ed PCB's to
                     KPES

                       None
                                                                                                                   (continued)
                                                             -344-

-------
                                                      TABLE 4 (continued)



Process
Biological
Composting


Available
capacity
Unit (or tire
operations to provide)

15,16. (16 mo)




Conditions Concentration
and limits handled

Seasonal effects, 1,530 ppi
reaction time must be
>4 weeks

. RCRA
waste
generated

Treated
material
is still a
8io-Clean
Sybrcn 8i-Chan 1006
                                  1,2,17
15,17
                  27 nfyd avail-      Proved for PCP, labor-    i3DO ppm
                  able, 12 so for     atory confirmed for
                  full-size           PCB's
Unknown
Unknow
                                                                                                                   fiCRA waste
                                                                                                                     None
                                                                                                                     Unkrni
NOTE-Unit operations key:

    1.   Liquid/solids separation
    2.   Extraction/solubilization (liquid-solids)
    3.   Liquid/liquid extraction
    4.   Chemical reactor
    5.   Stripping still
    6.   Solvent recovery still
    7.   Adsorption
    8.   Dryer  (solids)
    9.   Dryer  (liquids)              ,•
                                 10.   Filtration
                                 11.   Steam cleaning
                                 12.   Therm! reactor
                                 13.   Grinding
                                 14.   Air pollution controls
                                 15.   Landfara
                                 16.   Irmoculation/digestion
                                 17.   UV light reactor
                                                         -345-

-------
    None of the processes has currently
available capacity approaching that
required for major cleanups.  Therefore,
the time required to build capacity is '•
listed.  Construction time ranges from 12  ..
to 24 months.

    Certain conditions that typify the
process or limit*its versatility'are given'
in column 4'of TabVe'4.  fable 4 also
identifies any RCRA waste streams gener-
ated by the process.

    The data from studies of the processes
were examined for ranges of PCB concentra-
tions handled to date.  Generally, the
values are not limitations on the process,
but only on the data acquired.  The value
£300 ppm for the Bio-Clean process may,
however,, be a limitation requiring process
adjustment to control.

    Table 5 lists .five additional charac-
teristics of the processes and 'the rating
developed in the ranking process.  The
characteristics shown here relate to the
needs for further process development and
evaluation.  The process status is given
in terms of stages of development com-
pleted. t. The processes range in stages
completed from concept to pilot plant.

    Both PCB destruction and residual PCB
concentration in treated sediments are
given to the extent available.  Certain
processes may require extension of the
unit operations, employed  (e.g., more
stages of extraction) to attain the re-
quired performance levels.

    Test and evaluation data needs are
indicated for each process.  Needs vary
from none  (AER process) to complete site-
specific evaluation!

    The  estimated costs of applying the ~
process  are  listed in $/m3.  Although cost
estimates  lack the necessary accuracy at .,
this stage of development  of the  alterna-
tive processes to serve  as  the  sole
criterion  of potential,  they nevertheless
indicate that  seven  of the processes may
cost no more than landfill  and  five could
cost less.   (Cost estimates  could not  be
made for the Sybron  process  and compost-
ing.)

    The processes varied in complexity  as
evidenced  by the number  of unit operations
 employed.  Supercritical  water oxidation,
 Bio-Clean and vitrification each employed
 three unit operations; KPEG employed
 eight.  -Operator training requirements
. were,not• .evaluated comparatively due to
 insufficient data.  However, for the
 sealed-up treatment processes, the operat-
 ing labor requirements are expected to be
 quite similar.

 RANKING OF TREATMENT PROCESSES

      In contrast to process characteriza-
 tion which involves all factors listed in
 Tables 4 and 5, ranking is subjective and
 is based on the seven criteria previously
 described.  An attempt was made to define
 and  determine a single number that could
 represent the overall position of each
 process relative  to an arbitrarily defined
' perfect process.

      Based on the  weighted ratings, the
 processes rank as follows from highest to
 lowest:  KPEG, LARC, Acurex, Bio-Clean,
 Modar-Supercritical Water, Advanced
 Electric Reactor, Vitrification, OHM
 Extraction, Soil ex, Composting, and Sybron
 Bi-Chem  1006 PB/Hudson River Isolates.

 CONCLUSIONS

      Emerging treatment processes for
 decontamination of sediments containing
 PCBs  that''show potential as alternatives
 to  incineration and chemical waste land-
 fill  have been identified.  Eleven alter-
 native treatments were compared and ranked
 using technical performance,'status of
 development, test and evaluation data
 needs, and cost as factors.  The first
 eight processes show  potential for reduc-
 tion of  PCB concentrations  to the desired
-"background levels (1-5 ppm) or less, with
 minimum  environmental impacts and low  to
 moderate cost.  The sediments  must be
 dredged  for application of  these treat-
, ments...

      Of the eleven processes  assessed,  all
 but the  Advanced  Electric  Reactor  (AER)
 are in  various  stages of development  from
 laboratory-scale  through field  tests.  The
 AER is  a permitted treatment  under  TSCA in
 EPA Region VI,  based  on  completed trial
 burns.   There  is  no  immediately  available
 capacity for any  of  the  treatment proc-
 esses.   Further data  are  needed  in  most
 cases to define the  final  system designs
 for the processes.
                                           -346-

-------
                                            TABUS.  TREATMENT PROCESS ASSESSMENT
Process
                     Estimated
                       0/0/R
   Status3         efficiency,  *b
                                                              Estimated
                                                              residual       Test and evaluation     Estiasted
                                                              PCS. ppm           data heeds         cats. I/*3      toting
Chemical/physical

Supercritical  wter    Field test with
 oxidation, Modar      PCS liquids
                      >99.9995        <0.1 ppb
                                                                            1.2,3,4,5,6,1,         250-733
                                                           4.58
KPEG Terraolean-CL     Pilot tests
                      >98
                                                                                1.6
                                         208-375
                 5.42
LARC
Lab tests
                                        >90
38-50
2,3,4,5,6,7
223-336
                 S.»
Advanced electric
 reactor
Pilot tests
                                        >99.9999
<1ppb
830-943
 Physical

 0. H. Materials,       Field tests under
  methanol extraction   way
                      97
                                                        <25ppn
                      2.3,6.7
401-514
                 4.16
 Soilex
Pilot tests
                                                         6-9 ppn
                       5.6.7
856-913           3.26
(Jcurex solvent wash Pilot-scale e
(field tests
planned)
In-situ vitrification Pilot test of soil 99.9
Sattelle Pacific
NWforEPRI

- <2ppm


None in vitri-
fied block, 0.7
ppm in adjacent
soil
Identity of 196-569
mixed solvent,
6,7
6 255-548



5.21


4.S3



 See footnotes at end of table.
                                                                                           (continued)
                                                            -347-

-------
     Process
                                                     TABLE 5 (continued)
                                           Estimated         Estimated
                                             0/D/R           residual
                         Status9        efficiency, %b       PCS, ppm
                                Test and evaluation      Estimated
                                    data needs          costs, S/m3      Rating6
Biological
Cotpcsting, aerobic Lab-scale
anaerobic Lab-scale
62
18-47
504-908
825-1268
4,5,6
4,5,6
— 2.47
— 2.47
Bio-Clean, aerobic    Bench-scale
99.99
Sybren Bi-Chsa 1006    Lab-scale and concept  50
25ppb
                                                                                   3,5,6,7
                                                                                  3,4,5,6,7
                                                          191-370
                                                                                                                       4.84
                                                                                                                        1.46
NOTE—Data needs key:

     1.   0/D/R data
     2.   Residual PCS data
     3.   Unit operations data
     4.   Eench-scale data
     5.   Pilot-scale data
     6.   Field test data
     7.   Cost data
     8.   RCRA waste
 Status is drfined in terras of the types of studies completed.

 ba/Tj/R = destrocticn/detoxificaticn/reraoval.

 cite rating was obtained as shew by the example, under Characterization.

 dAER is fully permitted under TSCA in EPA Region  IV for destruction of PCS.

 <%eateent is continued until a residual of <2 ppm PCB's is obtained.
                                                          -348-

-------
     At  this  stage,  estimated  costs  of
 application  of  these  eleven processes are
 less than  or within the  range of costs of
 chemical waste  landfill, .except  for the
 AER  estimated cost, which  exceeds that of
 landfill,  but is  less than incineration.
 These costs  are planning estimates  only.
 In most cases,  further research  is  needed
 to provide data suitable for  more definite
 cost estimates.

     The emerging  treatment processes  are
 based on six types  of generic tech-
 nologies:  low-temperature oxidation,
 chlorine removal, pyrolysis,  removal  and
 concentration,  vitrification  (melting),
 and  microorganisms.   Types of generic
 technologies not yielding  competitive
 emerging processes  are:  chlorinolysis,
 stabilization,  and  enzymes.   A search of
 these technologies yielded no suitable
 candidate  processes at this time.

     On  the basis of the comparisons made,
 the  treatment processes were  ranked in
 order,  from  highest to lowest, as shown in
 Table 6.  The estimated cost  range  (1985
 dollars) per cubic meter of sediment
 treated is also shown for  each process.
 Costs of chemical  waste landfill  and  in-
 cineration are given.for comparison.

 NOTICE

    Although  the research  described in
 this  paper has been funded wholly or  in
 part  by the  United States  Environmental
 Protection Agency through  contract number
 68-02-3992 to the Research Triangle
 Institute,  it has not been subjected  to
 Agency review and therefore does not
 necessarily  reflect the views of the
 Agency and no official endorsement should
 be inferred.

 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, G.P.,  and R.L.  Peterson.  1985.
  Non-Sodium Process for Removal  of PCBs
  from Contaminated Transformer Oil, PCB
  Seminar,  EPRI, Seattle, Washington,
  October 22-25.

Addis, G.,  and J.  Marks,  eds.   1982.
  Proceedings:  1981 PCB Seminar, Dallas,
  Texas, December 1-3, 1981.   EPRI EL-
  2572,  Electric Power Research Institute,
  Palo Alto,  California.   331  pp.
 Agnew, R.W.  1984.  Removal and Treatment
  . of Contaminated River Bottom Muds:
   Field Demonstration.  NTIS Publication
   No. PB84-129022, EPA-600/52-84-006,
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
  _Cincinnati, Ohio.  70 pp.

 American Petroleum Institute.  1983.  Land
   Treatment—Safe and Efficient Disposal
   of Petroleum Waste.  Washington, D.C.,
   21 pp.

 Angiola, A.J.,  and J.M. Soden.   1982.
   Predicting and Controlling Downwind
   Concentrations of PCB from Surface
   Impoundments.  In:  Proceedings of the
   Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution
   Control  Association.  75(4):82.

 Arisman, R.K.,  R.C. Musick, J.D.  Zeff,  and
   T.C. Crase.  1981.  Experience  in Opera-
   tion of a Ultraviolet-Ozone (Ultrox )
   Pilot Plant for Destroying Polychlori-
   nated Biphenyls in Industrial Waste
   Influent.  In:  Proceedings  of the 35th
   Industrial  Waste Conference,  Purdue
   University, West Lafayette,   Indiana,
   May 11-13,  Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor,
   Michigan,  pp. 802-808.

 Bailin,  L.J., and B.L.  Hertzler.   1977.
   Development of Microwave  Plasma Detoxi-
   fication  Process for Hazardous  Wastes-
   Phase I.   NTIS PB-268526, EPA-600/2-77-
   030,  U.S. Environmental Protection
.   Agency,  Cincinnati,  Ohio.  82  pp.

 Bailin,  L.J., and B.L.  Hertzler.   1978.
   Development of Microwave  Plasma Detoxi-
   fication  Process for Hazardous  Wastes-
   Part I.   Environ.  Sci. Technol.
   12(6):673-679.

 Bailin,  L.J., B.L.  Hertzler,  and  D.A.
   Oberacker.  1978.   Detoxification of
   Pesticides  and Hazardous  Waste  by the
   Microwave. Plasma Process.  ACS  Symposium
   Series, No. 73,  American  Chemical
   Society,  Washington,  DC,  p. 49.

 Baillod, R.,  et al.   1978.   "Wet  Oxidation
   of. Toxic  Organic Substances," presented
   at  the Purdue Industrial  Waste  Confer-
   ence,  W.  Lafayette,  Indiana.

 Ball,  J., F.  Prizmar,  and P.  Peterman.
   1978.  Investigation  of Chlorinated and
   Nonchlorinated Compounds  in the  Lower
   Fox  River Watershed.  NTIS PB-292-818/2,
                                          -349-

-------
TABLE 6.  SUBJECTIVE RANKING OF TREATMENT PROCESSES ON OVERALL
        SUITABILITY, AND ESTIMATED COST OF APPLICATION
         Process
 Cost  of application,
    $/n)3 treated
   KPEG
   LARC
   Acurex Solvent Wash
   Bio-Clean
   Hodar Supercritical Water
   Advanced Electric Reactor
   Vitrification
   OHM Methanol Extraction
   Soil ex Solvent Extraction
   Composting
   Sybron Bi-Chem 1006
   Chemical Waste Landfill
   Incineration
       $211-378
       $223-336
       $196-569
       $191-370
       $250-733
       $830-942
       $255-548
       $400-514
       $856-913
Unable to estimate cost
Unable to estimate cost
       $260-490
      $1713-1826
                                 -350-

-------
  EPA-905/3-78-004, U.S. Environmental
  Protection Agency, Great Lakes National
  Program Office, Chicago, Illinois.  235
  PP-         .         .,-'..;

Bartos, M.J.  1978.  NYC's Plan to Meet
  the Water Quality Challenge.  Civ.  Eng.
  (Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.)  48(11):80-84.

Bedard, D.L., et al.  1985.  Rapid Screen-
  ing Assay for PCB-Degradative Ability,
  Bio. Sci. Br., General Electric Company,
  Corporate Research and Development,
  Schenectady, New York 12301.

Berg, O.W., P.L. Diosady, and G.A.V.  Rees.
  1972.  PCB Contamination of the Aquatic
  Environment in Ontario.  Paper presented
  before the Division of Water, Air,  and
  Waste Chemistry at the 173rd Meeting of
  the American Chemical Society, August
  28-September 1, 12(2):59.

Bergh, A.K., and R.S. Peoples.  1977.
  Distribution of Polychlorinated Bi-
  phenyls  in a Municipal Wastewater
  Treatment Plant and Environs. Sci.  Total
  Environ.  8(3):197-204.

Billings, W.N;, T.F. Bidleman, and W.B.
  Vernberg.  1978.  Movement of PCB from a
  Contaminated Reservoir into a Drinking
  Water Supply. Bull. Environ. Contam.
  Toxicol.  19(2):215-222.

Boyd, J.W., 1985.  Thermal Treatment of
  PCB's and PCB-contaminated Soils, EPRI.
  PCB Seminar Oct. 21-25, Seattle,
  Washington.

Brown, J.F., M.E. Lynch, J.C. Carnahan,
  and J. Singleton.  1981.  Chemical
  Destruction of PCB's in Transformer Oil.
  Preprint Extended Abstract.   Presented
  before the Division of Environmental
  Chemistry at the 182nd Meeting of the
  American Chemical  Society,  New York, New
  York, August 23-28,  21(2):90-92..

Brown, M.P.  1985a.   Characterization of
  Hudson River Sediment Provided to
  American Toxics Disposal, Inc. by the
  New York State Department of Environ-
  mental Conservation.  Office of Special
  Projects New York State Department  of
  Environmental  Conservation, Albany,  New
  York.  7 pp.
Brown, M.P.  1985b.
  Rogers, May 24.
Letter to C.J.
Brown, M, P.  1986;  Letter pf.April 16 to
  Donald L. Wilson'.

BruneTle, D.J., and D.A. Singleton.  1985.
  Chemical Reaction of Polychlorinated
  Biphenyls on Soils with PolyCEthylene
  Glycol)/KOH.  Chemosphere .  14(2):173-
  181.                    \f  '

Bumpus, J.A., et al.  1985. >;.Oxidation of
  Persistent Environmental 'Pollutants by a
  White Rat Fungus, Science 228, 1434-
  1436, .June 20, 1985.    ,   ,

Business Week. • 19781 : The Lagging  Cleanup
  of Great Lakes Pollution.  Bus. Wk.,
  May 29, p. 76.    '     '  '

Caplan, J.  1986.,  Personal Communication
  to Ben H. Carpenter', February 6.

Carcich, I.G., and J. Toff1emire.   1983.
  PCB Cleanup Activities on the Upper
  Hudson River.-'In:  Management of Bottom
  Sediments Containing Toxic Substances:
,  Proceedings of, the 7th U.S./Japanese
  Experts Meeting, National Technical
  Information Service, Springfield,
  Virginia, pp. 168-180.

Carcich, I.G., and T.J. Tofflemire.  1982.
  Distribution and Concentration of PCB in
  the Hudson River and Associated Manage-
  ment Problems.  Environ. Intl.  7 (2):73-
  85. --•

Caron, R.  1985.  Superfund Cleanup of PCB
  Contaminated Soil, Minden, West
  Virginia.  Personal Communication with
  Ben H. Carpenter, December.

Catelani, D., C. Sorlini, and V. Treccani.
  1971.  The metabolism of biphenyl by
  Pseudomaas Putida.  Experimentia
  27:1173-1174.

Centofanti, L.F.   1984.   Analysis of PCB
  Chemical  Destruction Effluents.    Pre-
  print Extended Abstract.  Presented
  before the Division of Environmental
  Chemistry at the 185th Meeting of the
  American Chemical  Society, St. Louis,
  Missouri, April  8-13,  24(1):11-12.

Chang, V.S.,  and D.A. Fast.   1983.   PCBs
  Spill  at Federal  Pioneer Limited's
  Regina Plant.  In:  Proceedings of the
  Environment Canada 1st Technical • Chemi-
  cal  Spills Seminar, Toronto, Canada,
  October 25-27,  p.  225.
                                          -351-

-------
Chen, K.  1982.  The Reclamation of Trans-
  former Oils Containing PCBs by the
  Sunohio PCBX Process, Final Report.
  Prepared for the Tennessee Valley
  Authority Office of Power, Division of
  Energy Demonstrations and Technology,
  Chattanooga, Tennessee.  TVA/OP/EDT-
  83/3, DE83 901683.  112 pp.

ChUds, K.  1982.  PCB Treatment and
  Destruction Technologies.  In:  Proceed-
  ings  of the 28th Ontario  Industrial
  Waste Conference, Ottawa,  Ontario,
  Canada, June 13-16, Ontario Ministry of
  the Environment, Ontario,  Canada,  pp.
  121-148.

Chu, N.S., and S.C  Vick.   1985.  Chemical
  Destruction of PCBs,  EPRI  PCB Seminar.
  Seattle, Washington.   October 27.

Clark,  R.R.,  E.S.K. Chian,  and  R.A.
  GHffin.   1979.  Degradation  of Poly-
  chlorinated  Biphenyls  by  Mixed Microbial
  Cultures.  Appl. Environ.  Mlcrobiol.
  37(4):680-685.

Counsel,  G.   1982.  Wrench-Lok  :  Ground-
  ing  Connections Simplified.   Paper pre-
  sented before  the Electrical  Equipment
  Committee  at the Pennsylvania Electric
  Association  Fall Conference,  Lancaster,
  Pennsylvania,  September 14.

Craddock,  J.H.   1982.   Polychlorinated
  Biphenyls  (PCBs) Disposal  and Treatment
  Technologies:   An Update.   Paper  pre-
  sented at  the  Fertilizer Institute
  Environmental  Symposium,  San  Antonio,
  Texas,  March 8-10,  p.  161.

Craft,  T.F.,  R.D. Kimbrough, and  C.T.
  Brown.  1975.   Radiation Treatment of
  High Strength  Chlorinated Hydrocarbon
  Wastes.   NTIS  PB-244388,  EPA-660/ 2-75-
  017,  U.S.  Environmental Protection
  Agency,  Athens, Georgia,  33 pp.

 Dallalre,  G.  1979.   Toxics in the  N.J.
   Environment:   Microcosm of U.S.  Ills.
   Civ. Eng.  (Am. Soc. C1v. Eng.)
   49 (9)-.74-80.

 Dawes, I.W., and I.W. Sutherland.  1976.
   Microbial  Physiology.  John Wiley and
   Son, New York.

 Dev, H., J.E. Bridges, G.C. Stesty, and
   C.J. Rogers.  1985.  In-Situ Decontami-
  nation of Spills and Landfills by Radio
  Frequency Heating.   Paper presented at
  the American Chemical  Society National
  Meeting,  Chicago, Illinois,  September.

Edwards, B.H., J.N. Paullin, and K.
  Coghlan-Jordan.  1982.  Emerging Tech-
  nologies for the Control of Hazardous
  Wastes.  EPA-600/2-82-011, NTIS PB 82-
  236993, U.S. Environmental Protection
  Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.  145 pp.

Electrical World.  1978.  One Solution to
  the PCB-Disposal Dilemma.  Elect. World
  190(9):52-53.

Environment Canada.   1983.  Destruction
  Technologies for Polychlorinated Bi-
  phenyls  (PCBs).  Economic and Technical
  Review Report  EPS 3-EC-83-1,  Environmen-
  tal Protection  Service, Ottawa,  Ontario,
  July  (reprint).  81 pp.

Environment Canada.   1983.  Proceedings of
  the Technical  Seminar on  Chemical
  Spills.  Toronto, Canada, October  25-27,
  291 pp.

Erler,  T.J.,  J.  Dragun, and D.R. Weider.
  1983.  Two  Case Studies of Cost-  Effec-
  tive  Remedial  Actions for PCB Contami-
  nated Soils.   In:   Proceedings of  the
  38th  Industrial  Waste Conference,  Purdue
  University, West Lafayette,  Indiana, May
  11-13, Ann  Arbor Science, Ann Arbor,
  Michigan, pp.  369-375.

Exner,  J.H.,  ed.   1982.   Detoxification of
  Hazardous Waste.  Ann Arbor  Science
  Publishers, Ann Arbor,  Michigan.   362
  pp.

Fedorko, J.W.  1982.   Protection of  the
  Hosensak 230 kV and Three Mile Island
  500 kV Capacitor Banks.   Paper presented
  at the Pennsylvania Electric Association
  Fall  Conference, Lancaster,
  Pennsylvania,  September 14.

FMC Corporation,  (n.d.)  'Industrial Waste
  Treatment with Hydrogen Peroxide,
  Industrial  Chemical Group,  2000  Market
  Street,  Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania.

Fox, L. L.,  and  N.J.  Merrick.   1983.
  Managing Polychlorinated Biphenyls in
  the Industrial Environment—A Case His-
  tory.  In:   Toxic  and Hazardous  Waste:
   Proceedings of the 15th Mid-Atlantic
                                           -352-

-------
   Industrial  Waste Conference, Lewisburg,
   Pennsylvania,  June 26-28, Butterworth
   Publishers, Boston,  Massachusetts, pp.
   336-344.

 Fradkin,  L.,  and S. Barisas.  1982.  Waste
   Management  Options for PCBs.  In:
   Industrial  Waste:  Proceedings of the
   14th Mid-Atlantic Industrial Waste Con-
   ference,  College Park, Maryland,  June
   27-29,  Ann  Arbor Science, Ann Arbor,
   Michigan, pp.  398-407.

 Furakawa,  K.   1982.  Microbial degradation
   of PCBs,  pp. 33-57.   A.M. Chakrabarty
   (Ed.),  Biodegradation and Detoxification
   of Environmental  Pollutants, CRC  Press,
   Inc.  Boca  Raton, Florida.

 Ghassemi, M.,  and M.  Haro.   1985. Hazard-
   ous  Waste Surface Impoundment Technolo-
   gy,  J.  Envir.  Eng.   Ill,  5,  October.

 Gilmer, H., and  F.J.  Freestone.   1978.
   Cleanup of  an  Oil  and Mixed  Chemical
   Spill at Dittmer,  Missouri,  April-May
   1977.   In:   Proceedings of the  1978
   National Conference  on Control  of Haz-
   ardous Material Spills, Miami  Beach,
   Florida, April  11-13,  Information Trans-
   fer,  Rockville, Maryland,  pp.  131-134.

 Githens, G.D.  1984.   Carbon Adsorption
   Onsite for  Remedial  Actions.   Pollut.
   Eng.  16(l):22-25.

 Gruenfeld, M., F. Freestone, and  I.
   Wilder.  1978.  EPA's  Mobile Lab  and
   Treatment System  Responds  to Hazardous
   Spills.  Ind. Water  Eng.   15(5):19-23.

 Hancher, C.W., J.M. Napier,  and F.E.
   Kosinski.   1984.  Removal  of PCB  from
   Oils and Soils.   Preprint  prepared for
   submission to:  5th  Department of Energy
   Environmental Protection  Conference,
   November 6-8, Albuquerque, New Mexico,
   DE85 002619.  7 pp.

 Hand, T.D., and A.W. Ford.   1978.   The
   Feasibility of Dredging for  Bottom
   Recovery of Spills of  Dense, Hazardous
   Chemicals.  In:   Proceedings of the 1978
   National Conference on Control of Haz-
   ardous Material Spills, April 11-13,
  Miami Beach, Florida,  pp. 315-324.

Hawthorne, H.S.  1982.  Solvent Decontami-
  nation of PCB Electrical  Equipment.
   In:   IEEE Conference Record of the
   Industrial  and Commercial  Power Systems
   Technical  Conference,  Philadelphia,
   Pennsylvania,  May 10-13,  Institute of
   Electrical  and Electronics Engineers,
   Inc.,  New York,  New York,  pp.  74-78.

 Hedley,  W.H.,  S.C.  Cheng,  B.O.  Desai,  C.S.
   Smith,  and  H.D.  Toy.  1983.  Alternate
   Treatment of Organic Solvents  and
   Sludges from Metal  Finishing  Operations:
   Final  Report.   NTIS Publication No.
   PB84-102151, EPA-600/52-83-094, U.S.
   Environmental  Protection Agency,
   Cincinnati,  Ohio.   363 pp.

 Hennings,  T.J.,  P.A.  Painter, L.L.  Scinto,
   and A.M.  Takata.   1982.  Preliminary
   Operations  Plan and Guidelines  for the
   At-Sea  Incineration of Liquid  PCB
   Wastes,  NTIS Publication No. PB83-
   181834,  EPA-600/52-82-068,  U.S.  Environ-
   mental  Protection Agency,  Research
   Triangle  Park, North Carolina.   121 pp.

 Herbst, E., et al.  1977.  Fate of  PCBs-
   14C in  Sewage  Treatment—laboratory
   experiments with activated  sludge.
   Chemosphere 6:725-730.

 Hetling,  L.J., T.J. Tofflemire, E.G. Horn,
   R. Thomas, and R. Mt. Pleasant.    1978.
   The Hudson River PCB Problem:   Manage-
   ment Alternatives.   Paper presented at
   the New York Academy.of Sciences  Confer-
   ence on the Health  Effects of Halo-
   genated Aromatic Hydrocarbons,  New York,
   New York,  June 24-27, p. 630.

 Hornig, A.W.  1984.   Destruction  of  PCB-
   Contaminated Soils with a High-Tempera-
   ture Fluid-Wall (HTFW) Reactor.   In:
   Proceedings of the  1984 Hazardous
   Material Spills Conference:  Prevention,
   Behavior, Control,  and Cleanup of  Spills
   and Waste Sites, Nashville, Tennessee,
  April 9-12, Government Institute,
   Rockville, Maryland, pp.  73-79.

Hornig, A.W.  1984.  Destruction of  PCB-
  Contaminated Soils with a High-
  Temperature Fluid-Wall  (HTFW)  Reactor..
  NTIS PB84-168798,  EPA-600/D-84-072,
  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency,
  Cincinnati,  Ohio.   23 pp.

Industrial Economics,  Inc.   1985.  Regula-
  tory Analysis of Proposed Restrictions
  on Land Disposal  of Certain Dioxin-
                                           -353-

-------
  Containing Wastes, Studies and Methods
  Branch,  EPA, Washington, D.C.

Isbister,  J.D., G.L. Anspach, and J.F.
  Kitchens.  1984.  Composting for Degra-
  dation of PCBs in Soil.  In:  Proceed-
  ings of the 1984 Hazardous Materials
  Spills Conference:  Prevention,
  Behavior, Control, and Cleanup of Spills
  and Waste Sites,  Nashville, Tennessee,
  April 9-12, Government Institute,
  Rockville, Maryland, pp. 104-109.

Jenkins, T.F., D.C. Leggett, L.V. Parker,
  J.L. Oliphant, C.J. Martel, B.T. Foley,
  and C.J. Deiner.  1983.  Assessment of
  the Treatability of Toxic  Organics by
  Overland Flow.  CREL 83-3, U.S. Army
  Corps of Engineers, Cold   Regions
  Research and Engineering Laboratory,
  Hanover, New Hampshire.

Kalmaz, E.V., R.B. Craig, and G.W.
  Zimmerman.  1981.  Kinetics Model and
  Simulation of the Concentration Varia-
  tions of the Species of Polychlori-
  nated Biphenyls  (PCBs)  Involved in
  Photochemical Transformation.  Preprint
  Extended Abstract.  Presented before the
  Division of Environmental  Chemistry at
  the  182nd Meeting of the American Chemi-
  cal Society, New York, New York, August
  23-28, 21(2):100-103.

Kitchens, J.F., G.L. Anspach, L.B.
  Mongoba, and E.A. Kobylinski.  1984.
  Cleanup of Spilled Chlorinated Organics
  with the LARC Process.  In:   Proceed-
  ings of the 1984 Hazardous Materials
  Spills Conference:  Prevention,
  Behavior, Control, and Cleanup of Waste
  Sites, Nashville, Tennessee, April 9-12,
  Government Institute, Rockville,
  Maryland, pp. 110-115.

Kitchens, J.F., W.E. Jones,  G.L. Anspach,
  and D.C. Schubert.  1982.  Light- acti-
  vated Reduction of Chemicals for
  Destruction of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
  in Oil and Soil.  In:  Symposium on the
  Detoxification of Hazardous Waste, Ann
  Arbor Science, Ann Arbor,  Michigan, pp.
  215-226.

Kluge, F.R., P.M.  Balma, W.  Turiansky, and
  R.V. Snow.   1982.  PJM  Joint Reactive
  Project  Installation of 230 kV Shunt
  Capacitor Banks  on the  Public Service
  Electric and Gas  Company System.  Paper
  presented at the Pennsylvania Electric
  Association Fall Conference,  Lancaster,
  Pennsylvania,  September 14.

Kokoszka,  L., and J.  Flood.  1985.  A
  Guide to EPA-Approved PCB Disposal
  Methods.  Chem. Eng. pp. 41-43,  July 8^

Komai, R.V.  1982.  Current PCB Research.
  Presented before the Edison Electric
  Institute/Envirosphere Company 5th
  Annual Conference on Environmental
  Licensing and Regulatory Requirements
  Affecting the Electric Utility Industry,
  October 27-29, Washington, D.C.   13 pp.

Komai, R.Y., D.C. Van der Meer, J. Figler,
  M.A. Bender, R.P. Kale, M.S.  Makar, and
  B.E. Pyatt.  1982.  Current PCB
  Research.  Paper presented at the 5th
  Conference of the Edison Electric
  Institute, Envirosphere Environmental
 . Licensing, and  the  Electric Industry,
  Washington, DC, October 27-29.

Kong, H.L., and G.S.  Sayler.  1983.
  Degradation and total mineralization of
  monohalogenated biphenyls in natural
  sediment and mixed  bacterial  cultures,
  Appl . Environ.  Microbiol.  46:666-672.

Kopeoky, Anne L.  1985.   PCB Biodegrada-
  tion Using Sybron Bi-Chem lOOb PB/Hudson
  River Isolates, Status  Report.  Sybron
  Chemicals, Birmingham,  N.J.

Lacy, W.J., and R.G.  Rice.  1977.   The
  Status and Future of Ozone for Water -and
  Wastewater Treatment. Ind. Water Eng.
Lafornara, J.P.  1978.  Cleanup After
  Spills of Toxic Substances.  Water
  Pollut. Control Fed. J.  50(4) :617-627.

Lahey, W., and M. Connor.  1983.  The Case
  for Ocean Waste Disposal.  Techno!. Rev.
  86(6):61-68.

Lapiere, R.B., et al . 1977.  Catalytic
  Hydrochlori nation of Polychlorinated
  Pesticides and Related Substances.
  Worcester Polytechnic Institute.   Pre-
  pared for Municipal Environmental
  Research Lab.  NTIS PB-262804.

Lauber, J.D.   1982.  Burning Chemical
  Wastes as Fuels in Cement Kilns.  J. Air
  Pollut. Control Assoc.  32(7) -.771-777.
                                           -354-

-------
Law Engineering Testing Company.  1982.
  Unsolicited Proposal for the Applica-
  tion of Ground Freezing Technology to
  Subsurface Contamination Control and
  Clean-up.  Law Engineering Proposal No.
  2032.91.

Lee, M.C., R.A. Griffin, M.L. Miller, and
  E.S.K. Chian.  1979.  Adsorption of
  Water-Soluble Polychlorinated Biphenyl
  Aroclor 1242 and Used Capacitor Fluid by
  Soil Materials and Coal Chars. J.
  Environ. Sci. Health  A14(5):415- 442.

Ludwigson, J., ed.  1984.  Proceedings of
  the 1984 Hazardous Material Spills Con-
  ference:  Prevention, Behavior, Control
  and Cleanup of Spills and Waste Sites,
  Nashville, Tennessee, April 9-12.  445
  PP.

MaCallum, A. D.  1948.  A Dry Synthesis of
  Armoatic Sulfides:  Phenylane Sulfide
  Resins.  J. Org. Chem. 13:154-160.

March, J.  1968.  Advanced Organic Chemis-
  try.  McGraw-Hill, New York.

Massey, M.J., and F.M. Walsh.  1985.  An
  Electrochemical Process for Decontami-
  nating PCB-Contaminated Transformer
  Coolants, EPRI, PCB Seminar.  Seattle,
  Washington, October 22-25.

McCormick, D.  1985.  One Bag's Meat.
  Biotechnology 3(May):429-435.

McGranaghan, M.F., and R.F. Gustin.  1982.
  Transient Switching Studies for EHV
  Shunt Capacitor Applications on the PJM
  System.  Paper presented at the
  Pennsylvania Electric Association Fall
  Conference, Lancaster, Pennsylvania,
  September 14.

McGrath, M.F.  1980.  The Fourth Coast.
  EPA Journal.  6(5):22-24.  Washington,
  DC

Mclntyre, A.E., R. Perry, and J.N. Lester.
  1981.  The Behavior of Polychlorinated
  Biphenyls and Organochlorine Insecti-
  cides in Primary Mechanical Wastewater
  Treatment.  Environ. Pollut. (Series B)
  21(3):223-233.

McManamon, K.  1982.  Sunohio's PCBX Proc-
  ess.  In:  Minutes of the Meeting of the
  Pennsylvania Electric Association,
  Engineering Section Electrical Equipment
  Committee, Fall 1982, Lancaster,
  Pennsylvania, September 14-15,
  Pennsylvania Electric Association,
  Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.  9 pp.

Mercer, B.W., G.W. Dawson, J.A. McNeese,
  and E.G. Baker.  1984.  Methods/ Materi-
  als Matrix of Ultimate Disposal Tech-
  niques for Spilled Hazardous Materials.
  NTIS Publication No. PB85-116853, EPA-
  600/2-84-170, U.S. Environmental Protec-
  tion Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.  130 pp.

Merrick, N.J., L.L. Fox and D.M. Coker.
  1983.  Polychlorinated Biphenyl Removal
  by a Combined Industrial Sanitary Treat-
  ment Plant.  In:  Toxic and Hazardous
  Waste:  Proceedings of the 15th Mid-
  Atlantic Industrial Waste Conference,
  Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, June 26-28,
  Butterworth Publishers, Boston,
  Massachusetts, pp. 402-415.

Meuser, J.M., and W.C. Weimer.  1982.
  Amine-Enhanced Photodegradation of Poly-
  chlorinated Biphenyls, Final Report.
  EPRI-CS-2513.  Batelle Pacific Northwest
  Labs, Rich!and, Washington.

Millan, R.C., and N.A.-Ostenso.  1984.  A
  Case Study of Storage and Disposal of
  PCB Contaminated Soils.  In:  Proceed-
  ings of the Conference on Hazardous
  Wastes and Environmental Emergencies:
  Management, Prevention, Cleanup, and
  Control.  Hazardous Materials Control
  Research Institute, Silver Spring,
  Maryland,  pp. 250-254.

Miller, R.A., and M.D. Sevientoniewski.
  (n.d)  The Destruction of Various Organ-
  ic Substances by a Catalyzed Wet Oxida-
  tion Process, Report for EPA, Contract
  68-03-2568.  Work Directive T-7016.

Miller, R.A., and R.D. Fox.  1982.
  Catalyzed Wet Oxidation of Hazardous
  Wastes from Detoxification of Hazardous
  Wastes.   J.H. Exner, ed., Ann Arbor
  Science.

Modell, M.,  G.G. Gandet, M. Simson, G.T.
  Hong, and K. Blemen, 1982.  Super-
  critical Water, Testing Reveals New
  Process Hold Promise, Solid Waste
  Management, August.
                                          -355-

-------
Honlck, B., and A. Blake.  1983.  New
  Industrial Wastewater Treatment Method
  for Removal of Multiple Contaminants.
  In:  Proceedings of the 70th American
  Electroplaters Society Annual Technical
  Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, June
  27-30, American Electroplaters Society,
  Winter Park, Florida,  13 pp.

Muller, B.W., A.R. Brodd, and J.P. Leo.
  1983.  Hazardous Waste Remedial Action-
  Picillo  Farm, Coventry, Rhode Island;'An
  Overview. J. Hazard. Mater.  7(2):113-
  129.

Murakami,  K., and K. Takeishi.  1976.
  Behavior of Heavy Metals and PCB's in
  the Removal and Treatment Operations of
  Bottom Deposits.  Paper presented at the
  Toxic Substances 2nd U.S./Japanese
  Experts  Meeting, October 25-29.

National Institute for Occupational Safety
  and Health.  1977.  NIOSH Criteria for a
  Recommended Standard Occupational Expo-
  sure to  Polychlorinated Biphenyls
  (PCBs).  DHEW  (NIOSH)  Publication No.
  77-225,  U.S. Department of Health, Edu-
  cation,  and Welfare, Washington, DC.
  224 pp.

New  England  River Basins Commission.
  1980.  Housatonic River Basin Overview.
  NTIS Publication No. PB82-107152, Water
  Resources  Council, Washington,  D.C.   209
  pp.

New  England  River Basins Commission.
  1980.  Housatonic River Basin Overview.
  NTIS  PB82-107152.   Prepared  for the
  Water  Resources Council, Washington,
  D.C.   199  pp.

New  York State  Department of  Environmental
  Conservation.   1985a.  Status  Report:
  PCB Biodegradation  Using Sybron Bi-Chem
  1006 PB/Hudson River Isolates.   Office
  of Special  Projects, Albany,  New York,
  May 21.   2 pp.

New  York State  Department  of  Environmental
  Conservation.   1985b.   Status Report:
  Wright-Malta  Steam Gasification Process.
  Office of Special  Projects,  Albany,  New
  York,  May 17.   2  pp.

 New  York University.   1984.   Development
  and Evaluation of a Low Energy Process
  Technology for Extraction  and Chemical
  Destruction of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
  (PCB's)  from Contaminated Soils and
  Sludges. -NYU/DASP 84-02.   New York,
  New York.  30 pp.

Oeschlaeger, H.F.  1976. Reactions of
  Ozone with Organic Compounds, Proc.
  Ozone Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Pavlov, S.P., and W. Horn.  1978.  PCB
  Removal  from the Duwamish River Estuary:
  Implications to the Management Alterna-
  tive for the Hudson River PCB Cleanup.
  Paper presented at the New York Academy
  of Sciences Conference on the Health
  Effects of Halogenated Aromatic Hydro-
  carbons, New York, New York, June 24-27,
  p. 651.

Peterson, R.C., A.S. Batolomeo, M.H.
  Corbin, and F. Roy.  1983.  Lehigh
  Electric  Site Superfund PCB Cleanup:
  Case History.  In:  1983 National Con-
  ference on Environmental Engineering:
  Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Con-
  ference,  Boulder, Colorado, July 6-8,
  American Society of Chemical Engineers,
  New York, New York, pp. 766-774.

Peterson, S.A., and K.K. Randolph, eds.
  1977.  Management of Bottom Sediments
  Containing Toxic Substances:  Proceed-
  ings of the Second U.S.-Japan Experts
  Meeting, October 1976, Tokyo, Japan.
  NTIS PB-272684,  EPA-600/3-77-083, U.S.
  Environmental  Protection Agency,
  Con/all is, Oregon.  303 pp.

Peterson,  R., and  E. Milicic.   1985.
  Chemical Destruction/Detoxification of
  Chlorinated Dioxins in Contaminated
  Soils,  Summary Report  (10-84—5-85,
  sponsored  by  EPA and Air  Force  E.56),
  Gal son  Research  Corporation,   E.
  Syracuse,  New York.

Plimmer,  J.R.   1978.  Approaches  to  Decon-
  tamination or Disposal  of Pesticides:
  Photodecomposition.   ACS  Symposium
  Series,  No.  73,  American  Chemical
  Society,  Washington,  DC,  p.  13.

Prengle,  H.W.,  and C.E.  Mauk.   1978.   New
  technology:   Ozone/UV chemical  oxidation
  wastewater process  for metal  complexes,
  organics,  and disinfection,  AIChE Symp.
  Series  7:228-243.
                                           -356-

-------
 Rhee,  G-Y.  1985a.  Anaerobic Biodegrada-
   tion of PCBs in Hudson River Sediments
   and  Dredged Sediment Disposal Sites.
   Proposal submitted to the New York State
   Department of Environmental Conserva-
   tion,  Albany, New York.  13 pp.

 Rhee,  G-Y.  1985b.  Letter to R.  Mt.
   Pleasant,  May 16.

 Rhee,  G-Y, M.  Chen, and B. Bush.   1985.
   Anaerobic Biodegradation of PCBs.
   Proposal submitted to the New York State
   Department of Environmental Conserva-
   tion,  Albany, New York.  17 pp.

 Rochkind,  M.L., G.S.  Saylor,  and  J.W.
   Blackburn.   1985.  Microbial  Decomposi-
   tion of  Chlorinated Hydrocarbons,  EPA
   Contract 68-03-3074-3.

 Rogers,  C.  J.,  and A.  Kernel.  1985.
   Laboratory and Field Tests  of Chemical
   Reagents for In  Situ Dextoxification of
   Chlorinated  Dioxins  fn  Soils.    Paper
   presented  at the American Chemical
   Society  National  Meeting, Chicago,
   Illinois,  September.

 Rogers,  C.J.   1983.   Chemical  Treatment of
   PCBs.in  the  Environment In:   Proceedings
   of the 8th Annual  Research  Symposium.
   Fort Mitchell,  Kentucky, March  8-10,
   1982,  EPA-600/9-83-003,  U.S.  Environ-
   mental Protection Agency, pp. 197-201.

 Rogers, C.J.   1985.   Letter to  J.B.  White,
   July 19.

 Ruzz, B.,  M. Iqbal, W.  Brenner, and  C.J.
   Rogers.  1985.   A Low Energy  Process  for
   the Extraction and  Chemical Destruction
   of PCBs  from  Contaminated Soils and
   Sludges.   Paper  presented at  the
   American Chemical Society National Meet-
   ing,  Chicago,  Illinois,  September.

Saunders, M.B.   1985.   Pilot  Studies for
   Solvent  Extraction of PCB from Soil,
   Proceedings of EPRI  PCB Seminar,
   Seattle, Washington.  October 22-25.

Schact, R.A.  1974.  Pesticides in the
   Illinois Waters of Lake Michigan.-  NTIS
   PB-245150, EPA 600/3-74-002, U.S..
   Environmental Protection Agency.
  Washington, D.C.  55 pp.
 Schiaris, M.P. ,  and G.S. Saylor.  1982.
   Biotransformation of PCB by Natural
   Assemblages of Freshwater Microorgan-
   isms.  Environ. Sci .  & Tech., 16:367-
   369.

 Scholz, R.,  and  J.  Milanowski.  1984.  EPA
   Project Summary:   Mobile System for
   Extracting Spilled Hazardous Materials
   from  Excavated Soils.   J. Hazard.  Mater.
   91(2):241-252.

 Schwinn,  D.E., D.F.  Storrier,  R.J. Moore,
   and W.S. Carter.   1984.   PCB Removal  by
   Carbon  Adsorption.   Pollut.  Eng.
 Shen,  T.T.   1982.   Estimation  of Organic
   Compound  Emissions  from Waste  Lagoons.
   J. Air  Pollut. Control  Assoc.   32(1): 79-
   82.

 Sloan,  K.J.,  et al .   1983.   Temporal
   Trends  Toward Stability of Hudson River
   PCB  Decontamination,  Bull. Envir.
   Contam. Toxicol., 31:377-385.

 Smith,  J.G.,  and L.B. Gurbacham.   1981.
   The  Use of  Sodium Naphthalenide to
   Chemically  Destroy  Polychlorinated Bi-
   phenyl  by Dechlori nation.  Preprint
   Extended Abstract.  Presented  before the
   Division of Environmental  Chemistry  at
   the  182nd Meeting of  the American Chemi-
   cal  Society, New York,  New York, August
   23-28,  21(2):88-89.

 Snell  Environmental Group, Inc.   1982.
   Rate  of Biodegradation  of  Toxic Organic
   Compounds While in  Contact with Organics
   Which Are Actively  Composting:   1982
   Final Report:  NTIS Publication No.
   PB84-193150, National Science  Founda-
   tion, Washington, DC.

 Sonksen, M.K., and J.A. Lease.   1983.
   Evaluation  of Cement  Dust Stabilization
   of Polychlorinated  Biphenyl -Contaminated
   Sludges.  In:  Proceedings of the 37th
   Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue
   University, West Lafayette, Indiana,  May
   11-13, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor,
  Michigan,  pp. 405-412.

Spittler,  T.M.  1984.   Field Measurement
  of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Soil  and
  Sediment Using a Portable Gas Chromato-
  graph.  ACS Symposium Series, American
  Chemical Society,  Washington, DC,
  267:37-42.
                                          -357-

-------
Star, R.  1977.  The Development of Pollu-
  tion Control in Japan.  IV. American and
  Japanese Controls of Polychlorinated
  Blphenyls (PCBs).  Harv. Environ. Law
  Rev.  1:561-567.

Strek, H.J.  1980.  Factors Affecting the
  Bloavailability of Polychlorinated Bi-
  phenyls (PCBs) in Soils.  NTIS PB81-
  209223, Prepared for the Office of Water
  Research and Technology, Washington,
  D.C.  109 pp.

Strek, H.J., J.B. Weber, P.J. Shea, E.
  Mrozek, and M.R. Overcash.  1981.
  Reduction of Polychlorinated Biphenyl
  Toxicity and Uptake of Carbon-14 Activi-
  ty by Plants Through the Use of Acti-
  vated Carbon. J. Agric. Food Chem.
  29(2):288-293.

Stretz, L.A., L.C. Borduin, W.E. Draper,
  R.A. Koenig, and J.S. Vavruska.   1982.
  Controlled Air Incineration of Hazardous
  Chemical Waste at the Los Alamos Nation-
  al Laboratory.   In:   Proceedings of the
  1982 Symposium on Waste Management:
  Waste Isolation  in the U.S. and Else-
  where, Technical  Programs and Public
  Communications.  Vol. 1:  General,
  Tucson, Arizona, March 8-11, Arizona
  Board of Regents, Tucson, Arizona, pp.
  281-299.

Stroud, F.B., R.T. Wilkerson, and A.
  Smith.   1978.  Treatment  and Stabiliza-
  tion  of PCB  Contaminated Water and
  Waste Oil:  A Case Study.  In:   Proceed-
  ings of the 1978 National  Conference on
  Control of  Hazardous  Material Spills,
  Miami Beach,  Florida, April 11-13,  In-
  formation Transfer, Rockville, Maryland,
  pp.  135-144.

Subnamanian,  R.V., and  R. Mahalingam.
  1977.  Immobilization of  Hazardous
  Residuals by  Encapsulation  (Semi-Annual
  Technical Report).  NTIS  PB-271410.
  National Science Foundation, Washington,
  D.C.  93 pp.

Sunohio.   (n.d.)   PCBX:   Chemical Destruc-
  tion of  PCB's.   Brochure.  Sunohio,  1700
  Gateway  Boulevard, SE,  Canton, Ohio
  47707.

Sweeny, K.H., and  J.R.  Fischer.  1970.
  Investigation  of Means  for Controlled
  Self-Destruction of Pesticides.   NTIS
  Publication No. PB-198224.  U.S.
  Environmental  Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC.  131 pp.

Sworzen, E.M., and D.G. Ackerman.  1982.
  Interim Guidelines for the Disposal/
  Destruction of PCBs and PCB Items by
  Non-thermal Methods.  NTIS Publication
  No. PB82-217498, EPA-600/2-82-069, U.S.
  Environmental  Protection Agency,
  Washington, DC.

Taylor, D.  1984.  Managing Organics in
  Sludge Reuse Programs.  BioCycle
  25(6):20-22.

Thomason, T.B. and M. Model 1, 1984.
  Supercritical  Water Destruction of Aque-
  ous  Wastes, Hazardous Waste 1(4):453-
  467.

Thorneloe, S.  1986.  Land Treatment Data
  Base, Memorandum to J. Durham, January
  31, Environmental Protection Agency,
  Office of Air Quality. Planning and
  Standards.

Timmerman, C.L.   1985.  In Situ Vitrifica-
  tion of PCB-Contaminated Soils,  Proceed-
  ings of EPRI PCB Seminar,  Seattle,
  Washington,  October 22-25.

Tittlebaum, M.E., et  al.   1985.   "State of
  the Art on  Stabilization of Hazardous
  Organic Liquid  Wastes and  Sludges."  CRC
  Critical Reviews  in Environmental
  Control, Vol.  15,  Issue  2, pp.  179-211.

Trump,  J.G.,  K.A. Wright,  A.J. Sinskey,
  D.N.  Shan,  and  R.  Fernald.  1979.
  Disinfection of Municipal  Sludge and
  Wastewater  by  Energized  Electrons.
  Report  No.  INIS-MF-6718,  In:   Proceed-
  ings  of the International  Seminar on
  Radioisotopes  and  Radiation Applied  to
  Environmental  Protection,  Sao  Paulo,
  Brazil, September  17.

Tucker,  E.S., et  alI.   1975.  Activated
  sludge  primary  biodegradation  of PCB's.
  Bull.  Environ.  Contam.  Toxicol.  14:705-
  713.

Tulp,  M.T.M., R.  Schmitz,  and 0.
  Hutzinger.  1978.   The  Bacterial
  Metabolism  of  4,4'-Dichlorobiphenyl  and
  Its  Suppression by  Alternative  Carbon
  Sources.    Chemosphere   7(1):103-108.
                                           -358-

-------
 U.S.  Army Corps of Engineers, Water
   Resources Support Center.  1983.
   Management  of Bottom Sediments Contain-
   ing Toxic Substances:  Proceedings of
   the 7th U.S./Japan Experts Meeting,
   November 2-4, 1981,  New York,  New York.
   Cont.  Accession No,  AI36740.   421 pp.

 U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.
   1980.   Identification and Listing of
   Hazardous Waste.   40 CFR 261,  Final
   regulation,  Federal  Register.

 U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.
   1980.   Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
   in  Manufacturing,  Processing,  Distribu-
   tion in Commerce,  and Use Prohibition.
   40  CFR 761,  Final  regulation,  Federal
   Register.

 U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.
   1985.   Assessment  of Incinerators as a
   Treatment Method  for Liquid Organic
   Hazardous Wastes:  Summary and Conclu-
   sions.   Washington,  DC,  March.  5 pp.

 U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency, and
   Oil  Spill  Control  Association  of
   America.   1978.   Control  of Hazardous
   Material  Spills:   Proceedings  of the
   1978 National  Conference  in Control of
   Hazardous  Material Spills,  Miami  Beach,
   Florida,  April  11-13.   458pp.

 United States Patent Office.   1983.
   Method  and Apparatus  for  Treating Poly-
   chlorinated Biphenyl  Contaminated
   Sludge.   U.S.  Patent  No.  4,402,274,
   Issued  to  W.C. Meenan  and G.D.  Sullivan,
   September  6.

 United States Patent Office.  1984a.
   Destruction of Polychlorinated  Biphenyls
   and Other  Hazardous Halogenated Hydro-
   carbons, U.S. Patent No.  4,469,661,
   Issued to  C.E. Shaltz, September 4.

United States Patent Office.  1984b.
  Methods for Decontaminating Soil.   U.S.
  Patent No. 4,447,541, Issued to R.L.
  Peterson, May 8.

Unterman, R., et al.  1985.  Microbial
  Degradation of Polychlorinated Bi-
  phenyls, Proceedings  of Tenth.Conf. on
  New Frontiers for Hazardous Waste
  Management, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. .
  September 15-18.  EPA/600-9-85-025.
 v. Low, E.  1983.  Vorkommen und
   Mikrobieller Umund Abbau von
   aromatischen Polyzyklen im Boden und in
   Siedlungsabfallen.  Forum Stadte-Hygiene
   34(5):263-267.

 V. Meyer,  W.  C.   1986.   A Study of Thiona-
   tion Reactions  for Use in Destruction of
   Toxic Wastes,  Initial  Tests of Thiona-
   tion Reaction  Conditions with Priority
   Pollutants.   Fairview Industries,  Inc.,
   Middleton,  Wisconsin  July. • EPA Contract
   No.  68-02-3992.

 Versar, Inc.   1976.   Assessment of Waste-
   water Management,  Treatment,  Technology,
   and  Associated  Costs  for Abatement of
   PCB  Concentrations in  Industrial  Influ-
   ents.

 Versar, Inc.   1984.   Work Plan  for PCB
   Analyses.   Versar  Proposal No. .84-989.
   Submitted to.the New  York State Depart-
   ment of  Environmental  Conservation,
   Albany,  New York,  June 28.

 Walker, K.H..   1977.   The Great  Lakes
   Cleanup.  Water:   Sewage Works
   124(11):85.

 Weaver, G.  1982. PCB  Pollution  in  the •
   New  Bedford, Massachusetts Area:   A
   Status Report.  Massachusetts Office of
   Coastal  Zone Management,  Report  sub-
   mitted to the Massachusetts New  Bedford
   PCB  Task Force, June.   62 pp.    .

 Webber,  M.D., H.D. Monteith,  and D.G.M.
   Corneau.  1981.  Assessment of Heavy
   Metals and PCB's at Selected  Sludge
   Application Sites  in Ontario.  Research
   Report No. 109, Research  Program for the
   Abatement of Municipal  Pollution Under
   the  Provisions  of  the  Canada-Ontario
   Agreement on Great Lakes  Water Quality,
   Environment Canada, Environmental  Pro-
   tection Service, Ottawa,  Ontario.  27-
   PP.

Weitzman, L.   1981.   Treatment and
  Destruction  of PCB  and PCB Contaminated
  Materials.   Preprint Extended Abstract.
  Presented before the Division of
   Environmental  Chemistry at the 182nd
  Meeting of the  American Chemical
  Society,  New York,  New York, August 23-
  28, 21:42-44.
                                          -359-

-------
Weltzman, L.  1984.  Cleaning of PCB Con-
  taminated Soils, Proceedings of 1983 PCB
  Seminar, EPRI, Atlanta, Georgia.
  December 6-8.

Weltzman, L.  1985.  Solvent Cleaning of
  PCB Contaminated Soils, Proceedings of
  PCB Seminar, EPRI, Seattle, Washington,
  October 22-25.

West, P.R., S.K.  Chaudhary, and R.H.
  Mitchell.   1983.  Photodechlorination of
  Polychlorinated Biphenyls Induced by
  Hydroquinone in Basic  Media.  Presented
  before the  Division of Environmental
  Chemistry at the 186th Meeting  of  the
  American  Chemical Society, Washington,
  DC, August  28-September 2, 23(2):384-
  387.

West, R.H., and  P.G.  Hatcher.   1980.
  Polychlorinated Biphenyls  in  Sewage
  Sludge and  Sediments  of the New York
  Bight.   Marine Pollut. B.   (11):126-
  129.

Wheeler,  J.   1986.  U.S. Army  Corps  of
  Engineers,  Buffalo District.   Contact
  Summary,  Research Triangle Institute,
  January 15.

WhHmore,  F.C.,  and J.D. Barden.   1983.   A
  Study of PCB Destruction  Efficiency and
   Performance for a Coal-Fired Utility
   Boiler.   Vol.  1 and 2.  NTIS Publication
  Nos.  PB84-110147 and PB84-110154,  EPA-
   600/52-83-101a and b, U.S. Environmental
   Protection  Agency, Research Triangle
   Park, North Carolina.  79 pp.

 Young,  D.R.,  and T.C. Heeson.   1977.
   Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Near-
   shore Marine Ecosystem off San Diego,
   California.  Report No. SCCWRP-109,
   Prepared by the Southern California
   Coastal Water Research Project for the
   California Regional Water Quality Board,
   San Diego,  California.  NTIS PB-283090,
   21 pp.

 Young,  D.R.,  D. McDermott-Erlich, and T.C.
   Heesoon.   1977.  Sediments as Sources of
   DDT and PCB.  Marine  Pollut. Bull.
   8(ll):254-257.

 Zimmie, T.F., and T.J.  Tofflemire.   1978.
   Maintenance Dredging  and Toxic Sub-
   stances.   In:   Proceedings of the  2nd
   Conference on  International Waterborne
Transport.  ASCE Urban Transportation
Division Specialty Conference, New York,
New York, October 5-7, 1977, American
Society of Chemical Engineers, New York,
New York, pp. 704-719.
                                            -360-

-------
                       MOBILE KPEG DESTRUCTION UNIT FOR PCBs, DIOXINS
                              AND FURANS IN CONTAMINATED WASTE

                              Charles J. Rogers, Alfred Kernel
                      Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                           U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                   Cincinnati, Ohio 45268

                                     Robert L. Peterson
                                Gal son Research Corporation
                                E. Syracuse, New York 13057


                                          ABSTRACT

     The presence of highly toxic and persistent chemicals.in liquids, soils, sediments,
and sludges in abandoned waste sites poses a threat to both public health and the environ-
ment.  Incineration is frequently used to destroy highly hazardous wastes, however,  when
operated under less than optimum combustion conditions acutely hazardous products includ-
ing polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)
can be formed and emitted in the combustion products.  Various biological, chemical, and
physical methods have been tested and have been demonstrated to be effective to varying
degrees in destroying halo-organics.

     The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has supported research intramurally
and extramurally since 1980, to develop an alternative method for in-situ or on-site de-
struction of halogenated pollutants.  Chemical reagents prepared from polyethylene glycols
and potassium .hydroxide fKPEGs) have been demonstrated under mild conditions (25°-140°C)
to dehalogenate PCDDs and PCDFs to less than 1 ppb of starting materials.  The reaction
mechanism is nucleophilic substitution at an aromatic carbon.

     Toxicological tests have established that arylpolyglycol by-products from KPEG  reac-
tions are non-toxic.  In July and August, 1986, a 2700 gallon KPEG reactor was used  in
Butte, Montana and Kent, Washington to successfully destroy PCDDs and PCDFs (120 ppb - 200
ppm) in 17,000 gallons of liquid waste to non-detectable levels.  A new 2 cubic yard KPEG
reactor designed to treat both liquids and soils will  be field tested in 1987.
INTRODUCTION

     The accumulation pf polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) and polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs, "dioxins") in
soil, sediment, and living tissue is a
serious problem that has received consider-
able public attention in recent years.  As
an example, there existed in 1982 an esti-
mated 415 commercial wood-preserving plants
in the U.S. generating daily a total of
nearly 5.5 million gallons of process waste
which contained toxic materials (1),  The
pentachlorophenol (PCP) products purchased
by industry to treat wood normally contain
100-200 ppm heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(HpCDD) and 1000 to 25000 ppm octachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD).  Also, pre-
liminary investigations of dioxins showed
that in the use of PCP with these high
concentrations of HpCDD and OCDD, and with
the high temperatures and pressures in-
volved, there existed the possibility that
the more toxic tetrachlorinated dioxins
and furans might be formed.  Of the dis-
posal options available, the majority of
the wood preserving plants practiced stor-
ing the waste water on site, relying on
evaporation to reduce liquid waste to
sludge.
                                         -361-

-------
     Conventionally, the "clean up" of such
contaminated sites usually involves land-
filling and is not really a permanent
solution but rather a transfer of a toxic
waste from one region to another.  Land-
filling will be curtailed in 1988 under the
1984 RCRA amendments.

     The chemical stability of PCDD, PCBs
and other haloorganics precludes their
destruction by,conventional refuse incin-
eration methods.  Most municipal inciner-
ators cannot achieve the high temperatures
necessary to destroy these chemicals.
(•Jobile incinerator technology has been
developed for  on-site treatment  of waste,
however, early estimates are that on-site
incineration of toxic waste at a wood
preserving  site will be costly.

CHEMICAL PROCESS

      Chemical  decontamination  is an  alter-
native to thermal  processing  or  landfilling
of soils contaminated with PCDDs or  other
aromatic halides  such as  chlorobenzenes  or
PCBs.  Chemical  decontamination, like  in-
cineration, involves changes  to  the  chemi-
cal  structure of the dioxin molecule.
While chlorinated dioxins  are thermally
stable, they readily dechlorinate  to water
soluble compounds under relatively mild
conditions  of temperature and pressure.
For example, chlorinated dioxins in oil  are
 readily reduced to the  parts per trillion
level within 15 minutes at 80°C by reacting
them with  a compound which is not  oil
 soluble.   In soils processing, the PCBs  and
 PCDDs are dechlorinated to a water soluble
 form which will remain with the soil or be
 contained in the reagent that is recovered
 for reuse.  Dechlorination also affects the
 toxicity of the dioxin, with dioxins con-
 taining fewer than three chlorine atoms
 generally showing low toxicity  (2).

      The proposed mechanism for these reac-
 tions is shown in the following example
 using 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin:
  PROCESS CHEMISTRY

          ROH + KOH


      Cl
glycol 400 (PEG 400) to form an alkoxide.
The alkoxide (R0~) reacts with one of the
chlorine atoms on the chlorinated dioxin to
produce an ether and the alkali metal salt.
This dechlorination may proceed to complete
dechlorination, although replacement of a
single chlorine is sufficient to make the
reaction products water soluble.

TOXICITY CONSIDERATIONS

     A major concern in this type of pro-
cessing involves the toxicity of any re-
agents and/or  reaction products which may
be  left in the decontaminated matrix after
treatment.   Some toxicity data on reagents
used  in the  process  are shown in Table 1,
along with comparison  values  for sodium
chloride and  2,3,7,8-TCDD.  The  reagents
used  in this  process are some five times
less  toxic than table  salt, and  roughly
six orders of magnitude less  toxic than
2,3,7,8-TCDD,  the  dioxin isomer  of major
concern.   Polyethylene glycol  400 is an
FDA approved material  for use in  foods and
cosmetics.

      Toxicity testing  of the  reacted aro-
matic halides were conducted  in  EPA's
Research  Triangle Park and  Duluth labora-
tories.   Structural  assessment of the  theo-
 retical  toxicity of the reaction products
 is favorable, i.e., the known reaction pro-
 ducts would  not be expected to show signif-
 icant toxicity.  Results of the Ames test
 for mutagenicity are negative, i.e., the
 reaction products do not demonstrate car-
 cinogenic potential.  Bioaccumulation tests
 also produced negative results, which is
 not surprising given the water solubility
 of these reaction products (3,4).

      In earlier LV$Q studies conducted by
 the EPA Duluth laboratory and others, it
 was demonstrated that 2,3,7,8-TCDD is
 extremely toxic to fish, producing
 mortality in  carp at water concentrations
                                                    TABLE 1.  TOXICITY OF REAGENTS AND
                                                              COMPARISON MATERIALS
         Material
J-Dsn.  Oral-rat(3)
  An alkali  metal  hydroxide,  usually  potas-
  sium hydroxide  (KOH)  is  reacted  with  an
  alcohol  or glycol  such  as  polyethylene
  polyethylene  glycol  400
  sodium chloride
    (comparison value)
  2,3,7,8-TCDD
    (comparison value)
                                                                            27,500 mg/kg
                                                                             3,000 mg/kg

                                                                             0.022 mg/kg
                                           -362-

-------
 as low as 60 ppq (5,6,7,8).  By analyzing
 tissue residue levels of TCDD in these carp
 and expressing the results as ug accumula-
 tion dose/kg body weight, it was possible
 to make a rough comparison between.these
 results and mammalian studies investigating
 TCDD.  These comparisons indicate that carp
 are approximately as sensitive to TCDD as
 guinea pigs.  (LD50 600 ng/kg body weight.)

      In 1050 tests 5.8 mg of by-products
 from the KPEG-TCDD reaction was injected
 into a 40 liter aquarium containing  15
 carp.  This resulted in a nominal  water
 concentration of-2501 ppt of
 reacted TCDD (3).  In a previous study
 conducted under similar conditions except
 at a measured water concentration  of 60 ppq
 TCDD, carp showed gross pathological  damage.
 These damages included cranial  deformation,
 lateral  line lesions, fin darkening,  hemor-
 rhages and ulceration of the ventral  body
 wall  (5,6).   The absence of mortality and
 gross pathological  damage in exposures to
 KPEG-TCDD adducts concentrations more than
 4000-fold greater than those in  the  previ-
 ous  study lead  to the conclusion that
 treatment of TCDD with KPEG changes  it to
 a  non-toxic  form or at least reduces  its
 toxicity  by  several  orders  of magnitude
 (3).   The non-toxic properties  of  KPEG
 reaction  products improves  the  prospects  of
 on-site treatment,  delisting and disposal
 of haloorganic  contaminated  materials.

 FIELD TESTS

      Studies  were initiated  in January  1986
 to determine  if  KPEG  could  be used to  treat
 PCDD  and  PCDF contaminated  oil at  a wood
 preserving industrial  site  near Butte,
 Montana.  The wood  preserving site con-
 tained approximately  9000 gallons  of  light
 petroleum oil collected previously from
 groundwater over  a  period of two years.
 The oil contained 3.5% pentachlorophenol,
 PCDD  and  PCDF homologs ranging from 422 ppb
 of tetrachlorinated isomers  to 83,923 ppb
 of octachlorinated  isomers.  Because of the
 presence of these highly toxic chlorinated
 dioxins and furans, the oil could not be
 transported off-site for incineration.
 Bringing i.n and operating a mobile inciner-
 ator for on-site destruction of contami-
 nated oil  was rejected because of high
costs.

     In-April 1986, U.S. EPA Region 8
agreed, after review of laboratory data,
that the chemical process, based upon a
 KPEG reagent, could be used to decontami-
 nate on-site the PCDD/PCDF contaminated
 oil.

      Initial treatment experiments with
 some of the PCP waste-contaminated samples
 obtained from Butte, Montana were accom-
 plished on January 9, 1986.  For these
 tests, two 500-ml  samples were obtained,
 one an oil waste and the other a contam-
 inated soil.  The  procedures utilized for
 the treatment of the oil  samples with the
 KPEG reagents are  described in the
 following:

 0 Two aliquots of  oil  samples (24.94 grams)
   were removed from the container and
   accurately weighed into new, pre-cleaned
   125-ml  sample bottles fitted with  Teflon-
   lined caps.  A reagent  blank bottle was
   simultaneously prepared.

 0 Twenty-five (25)  grams  of the KPEG re-
   agent were added,  at  ambient temperature,
   to  each of the three  sample bottles
   mentioned  above.

 0 The bottles were  placed in  sand baths
   maintained at  temperatures  of 70°C and
   100°C for  a period of 8 hours  and  the
   contents of each  bottle were stirred with
   a motor-driven stirring rod  during this
   entire  period.

 0  Accurately  weighed aliquots  (typically
   1-5 grams)  of  the  sample were  removed
   from  the reactor at intervals  of 15
   minutes  and  placed in 125-ml flint  glass
   bottles.   The  destruction reaction  which
   had been occurring was  quenched by  adding
   a sufficient quantity of 50% 1^04  to
   each  bottle  to adjust the pH to about
   pH  7, as determined by  indicator paper.

      Following quenching  of the treated
samples, the bottles were set aside until
test  portions could be successfully extrac-
ted and analyzed (9).

     The procedures for extraction and
analysis of PCDD and PCDF were based on
adding appropriate  internal standards to
each aliquot taken  from the reaction.  At a
minimum, 1-2 ng_each of 2,3,7,8-[13Cs]-
TCDD, 2,3,7,8-[':i7Cl4]-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF
were added to each  125-ml  flint glass
bottle containing 1-5 grams of the treated
oil sample.  Sample extracts were prepared
and were analyzed using DB-5 capillary GC
columns to obtain data on  the concentra-
                                          -363-

-------
tions of PCDDs and PCDFs.  Perkin-Elmer
Sigma II or Varian 3740 GCs were used for
the analysis.  The Kratos MS-30 Mass
Spectrometer was used in the low resolution
mode to detect PCDDs and PCDFs.  If PCDDs
and PCDFs were detected, a second portion
of the sample extract was analyzed using
high resolution MS (9).

RESULTS

     The oil  samples obtained from the
Butte, Montana site were treated as de-
scribed with  KPEG and were analyzed by GC
MS to determine if PCDDs and PCDFs had been
destroyed,  as required  by the  regulation,
to less than  1 ppb.  Table 2 shows that
many of the congeners of PCDD  and PCDF were
destroyed  effectively by the KPEG with a
temperature as low as 70°C for 15 minutes.
All  PCDD and  PCDF congeners were completely
destroyed  by  KPEG when  the sample was
heated  to  100°C  for  30  minutes. As  a
 result  of  the successful laboratory  tests,
 arrangements  were made  to  lease equipment
to treat the  remaining  oil stored  on the
 site (10).

      The field equipment used  to process
 the oil  consisted  of a  2700-gallon  reactor
 mounted on a 45-foot trailer equipped  with
 a boiler,  cooling system,  a  laboratory and
 a control  room.   Heating of  the oil  and re-
 agent was achieved by recirculating the oil
 and KPEG via a pump and high shear mixer,
 through a shell  and tube heat exchanger.
 The heat transfer fluid on the shell side
 of the heat  exchanger was heated using a
boiler or cooled through a series  of radi-
ator type air coolers.   The PCDD-  and PCDF-
contaminated oil was treated in five
batches, each consisting of 1400 to 2000
gallons, requiring 600 gallons of  KPEG
reagent per batch.  The mixture was heated
to 150°C and allowed to react for  one and
one half hours before cooling.  The treated
oil was pumped out of the reactor  and into
a holding tank to confirm by subsequent
analysis that PCDDs and PCDFs in the oil
had been destroyed below detection limits.

     The data from the sampling and analy-
sis of  each tank  revealed that all PCDDs
and PCDFs were  destroyed to below the 1 ppb
detection limit.  The treatment cost was
only 10% of the  projected incineration
cost.

      In August  1986 the equipment was
transported to  Kent, Washington at the
request of  U.S.  EPA Region  10  and was
used  successfully to treat  approximately
8000  gallons  of 2,3,7,8,-TCDD-contaminated
liquid  waste  discovered on  an  industrial
hazardous waste disposal  site.

      Currently, a new,  improved 1  to 2-
 cubic yard  reactor,  designed  to treat  both
 liquids and solids,  is  being  constructed.
 In early 1987,  field  verification  studies
 will  be conducted with  this new KPEG re-
 actor on four selected  PCDD/PCDF- and PCB-
 contaminated sites.   In 1987,  it  is
 expected that the KPEG process can be
 demonstrated to be cost-effective when used
 at wood preserving and Superfund  sites to
                         TABLE 2.  LABORATORY-SCALE TREATMENT OF OIL
Contaminants Concentration in
CDD/CDF Untreated Oil (ppb)
TCDD (2,3,7,8-)
TCDD (total)
PeCDD
HxCDD
TCDF (2,3,7,8-)
TCDF (total)
PeCDF
HxCDF
HpCDF
OCDF
28.2
422
822
2982
23.1
147
504
3918
5404
6230
Concentration in
Treated Residue (ppb) *MDC
70°C, 15 min. 100°C, 30 min.
-
"
—
12.1
33.3
4.91
5.84

0.65
0.37
0 71
0 I -3
0.28
0.35
0 36
0.76
1.06
2.62

  *Minimum detectable concentration in parts per billion.
                                            -364-

-------
 destroy toxic halogenated pollutants in
 liquids, sediments, sludges and soils.

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

      Dr. Thomas 0. Tiernan and Staff, Brehm
 Laboratory, Wright State University, in
 cooperation with EPA HWERL, treated the
 oil  samples and provided the analytical
 services under a U.S.  EPA contract (Viar
 Co.  SAS NO 1724-X).

      The testing of KPEG to destroy PCDDs
 and  PCDFs  was  co-funded  by the Department
 of the  U.S. Air Force, Headquarters Air
 Force Engineering and  Services Center
 Tyndall  Air Force Base,  FL.  Captain Edward
 Heyse was  the  U.S.A.F. Project Officer.

 REFERENCES

 1.  Wilson,  D.,  Summary  Status  of  The Wood
    Preserving  Industry,  EPA Food  and Wood
    Products Branch  Internal Report,  1982.

 2.  Esposito, et  al., EPA 600/2-80-197
    p. 187.

 3.  Cook, P. et al.  Bioaccumulation Tests
    of Detoxified By-products.  Internal
    Report, Dec. 1986.

4.  DeMarini, D. et al.  Bioassay Testing
    of Detoxified By-products.   Internal
    Report, Dec. 1986.
 5.  Cook, P. M., D. W. Kuehl  and A. R.
     Batterman.  Presented at  SETAC Annual
     Meeting, November 2-5, 1986.  Radisson
     Mark Plaza Hotel, Alexandria, VA.

 6.  Johnson, R. D., D. B. Lothenbach and
     A. R. Batterman.   Presented at SETAC
     Annual  Meeting, November  2-5, 1986.
     Radisson Mark  Plaza Hotel,  Alexandria
     VA.  ,

 7.  Mehrle,  P.  M.,  D. R.  Buckler,  E. E.
     Little,  J.  D.  Petty,  D. L.  Stalling,
     G. M. DeGreeve, J.  M.  Coyle and  W. J.
     Adams.   Presented at  SETAC  Annual
     Meeting,  November 2-5, 1986.   Radisson
     Mark  Plaza  Hotel,  Alexandria,  VA.

8.   Kuehl, D. W., et  al.   Bioavailability
     of Polychlorinated  Dibenzo-p-Dioxins
     and Dibenzofurans from Contaminated
     Wisconsin River Sediment to Carp.
     Submitted to Chemosphere.

9.   Tiernan, T., et al., Wright State
     University, Dayton, Ohio,  Interim.
    Report on the Assessment of Chemical
    Reagents for Destruction of Higher
    PCDD/PCDFs.  Internal  Report prepared
    for U.S.  EPA, April 15, 1986.

10. Peterson, R., Potassium Polyethylene
    Gycol  Treatment  of PCDD/PCDF -  Con-
    taminated Oil In Butte, Montana.  IT
    Corp./Galson Research  Corp., Proiect
    #86-706,  July 1986.              J
                                          -365-

-------
                       SUPERCRITICAL SOLVENT EXTRACTION

                     Charles A. Eckert, Gregory W. Leman,
                    Joan F. Brennecke, and Steven R. Alferi
                      Department of Chemical Engineering
                   University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801

                                   ABSTRACT







 technology to problems in environmental control.

     This paper first discusses the technical advantages of supercriticalfluid










 significantly less than that for traditional methods.
INTRODUCTION

    Supercritical fluids (SCF's) are the
medium for an exciting new separation
technology which has the potential to
provide a much safer and less expensive
alternative for the detoxification of
materials at waste sites and the delist-
ing of industrial adsorbants.  In recent
years there have been a wide variety of
successful new applications of SCF tech-
nology which demonstrate the technical
feasibility as well as the cost-
effectiveness of such processes.  In
this paper we discuss the theoretical
basis of SCF processing and report on
design and economic studies made at the
University of Illinois aimed at the
development of mobile units for waste
treatment using SCF separations, in a
manner to optimize safety, economics,
and public acceptability.
    A SCF is a fluid that has been
heated and compressed beyond its criti-
cal temperature and pressure, existing
as a single phase with some unique prop-
erties.  It is quite dense, almost as
dense as a liquid, which gives a large
capacity for solutes; it has a high
molecular diffusivity and low viscosity,
which make it an ideal medium for effi-
cient mass transfer; and finally it has
and unusually high compressibility,
which permits large density changes with
very small pressure changes, thus yield-
ing extraordinary selectivity character-
istics.

    The solubility of heavy organic
solutes in SCF's is frequently many
orders of magnitude greater than the
solubility in an ideal gas.  The ratio
                                          -356-

-------
  of these two solubilities is defined as
  thg enhancement factor and values of
  10 '-10  are quite common.  In addition,
  we have found that a one phase mixture
  of a pure SCF and a properly-chosen
  chemical "entrainer" greatly increases
  the solubility of solid solutes and/or
  enhances the separation of two solutes.
  An "entrainer" is a small percentage
  (1-5%) of an additional solvent added to
  the SCF,  such as acetone, alcohol,  or
  water added to O>2.   This increase in
  solubility and separation is due to spe-
  cific chemical interactions between the
  entrainer and the solute (e.g.  Lewis
  acid/base interaction or hydrogen bond-
  ing) .   As an example of the effect  that
  is possible,  the increase in selectivity
  of the removal of acridine from an  acri-
  dine/anthracene mixture when 1%
  entrainer is  added to supercritical CO
  is shown  in Figure I.                 2

     Different entrainers in different
  supercritical  solvents will exhibit var-
  ying degrees of solubility and separa-
  tion ability.  A careful choice of  the
  solvent and entrainer permits the
  exploitation of the chemical interac-
  tions with the solutes to be separated
  to create an optimum solvent mixture or
  "tailor" a solvent for a process.  For
 example, the removal of trichlorophenol
 from contaiminated soil might be greatly
 increased by the addition of a small
 amount of amine as an entrainer.  The
 specific chemical interaction between
 the acidic trichlorophenol and basic
 amine is likely to greatly increase  the
 solubility. Since the equilibrium or
 maximum concentration of the solute  in
 the SCF will ultimately determine the
 economic feasibility  of SC extraction
 processes  we recognize the importance of
 tuning solvent properties and composi-
 tions  to maximize solubilities.

     SCF technology has been widely used
 in  many fields.   In the oil industry
 "miscible  flooding" with  supercritical
 C02 has Ion9 been a highly successful
 technique  in tertiary oil recovery.
 Also the Kerr-McGee prizewinning ROSE
 process uses supercritical pentane to
permit the processing of heavier and
dirtier crudestocks.  In the food busi-
ness supercritical CO  has been used for
a variety of processes, including coffee
decaffeination, flavor recovery, removal
of cholesterol from eggs, defatting of
  foods,  and others.   There are many other
  applications now in practice, such as
  the extraction of thermally labile mate-
  rials from natural  products,  separation
  of ethanol from fermentation beers, coal
  desulfurization and liquefaction,  ana-
  lytical techniques  such as SCF chroma-
  tography,  and more.   Thus there exists
  copious proof of the technical feasibil-
  ity and economic advantages of SCF pro-
  cessing.

      Many of the above applications were
  originally developed empirically,  and
  were limited due to the paucity of
  experimental data and scientific under-
  standing of the SCF  state that existed a
  few years  ago.   However recently a num-
  ber of  studies have  been carried out
  which have given us  not only  a better
  physical understanding of the SCF  state,
  but the data to develop valid and
  reliable mathematical models  from which
  one may do economic  feasibility studies
  as well as designs and  scaleups  [1-10].
  In  the work reported here we have relied
 heavily upon these recent research
 results, and they were essential to the
 design process.

     There are two major ways in which
 waste materials are detoxified by SCF
 extraction.  The first is the direct
 contact, or single step method, in which
 contaminated material, solid or liquid,
 is contacted directly with the SCF,
 which extracts the toxic substances in
 highly concentrated form for subsequent
 treatment.   This method is generally
 used with solids and with liquid streams
 with relatively high contaminant concen-
 trations.   For more  dilute liquid
 streams, a  two-step method is  generally
 superior.   In this the contaminant  is
 removed  at  ambient pressure and tempera-
 ture by  an  adsorbant, for example granu-
 lar activated carbon  (GAG),  and the
 adsorbant is subsequently regenerated by
 SCF extraction.   Studies [11,12] have
 demonstrated such regeneration to be far
 superior to conventional thermal regen-
 eration.

     The  types of  environmental problems
 that seem best solved by SCF technology
 involve  the removal of organics from the
soils and sludges  found  in the 546
National Priorities List waste sites,
the detoxification of leachates and
groundwaters, plus the regeneration of
                                          -367-

-------
the GAG used in thousands of industrial
pollution control operations.  In the
past much material has been disposed of
by burial, preceded by transportation to
a chosen site. Burial will not be a
viable alternative in the future, and
the transportation itself constitutes a
hazard.  We and others have designed and
shown economic feasibility for station-
ary SCF toxic waste removal plants, but
these do not address both parts of the
problem.  Thus, we have developed
designs and economic analyses for mobile
SCF separation units, capable of trans-
 portation by highway trailer to waste
 sites for rapid setup and safe and eco-
 nomical operation on site.

 CURRENT TECHNOLOGY

     The methods in current use for
 hazardous waste treatment—particularly
 for the National Priority List Sites
 —represent an iiranediate response to
 very recently defined problems, but not
 viable long-range solutions.  Up to the
 present there has been much emphasis on
 hazard containment and volume reduction,
 including the transportation of
 abandoned wastes to approved containment
 sites.  Such procedures, however, are
 not long-term solutions; not only does
 this in no way lessen the total amount
 of material which must be detoxified,
 but substantial extra hazard, and
 public-perception of hazard, is
 introduced by the transportation
 process.  The current direction of
 research therefore must be containment
 and on-site treatment, developing
 methods  that can be applied economically
 to a variety of wastes and which produce
 treated  materials suitable for reuse in
 industry or for return to the
 environment.

     One  of the methods which has been
 applied  to detoxification of contami-
 nated solids is incineration.  This
 technology has been scaled  for rela-
 tively mobile operation (6-8 semitrail-
 ers and several weeks for setup are
 required), and  it does produce residues
 which can be buried on-site.  The great-
 est  limitation, however,  is the cost,
 which has been variously estimated at
 $50O-1000/yd .

      The cost of incineration of GAG  is
  comparable.  Thermal regeneration per-
mits reuse of GAC, but is expensive
itself, and involves a substantial loss
of capacity on each cycle.  Thus the
treatment of groundwaters and leachates
with GAC is expensive by current tech-
nology.  Various reports of GAC costs
run from $0.35-1.50/lb.

    There also exists a class of prob-
lems involving sludges, with relatively
high concentrations of metals and
organic materials.  The best disposal
method seems to be solidification for
burial.  Vendor and literature  informa-
tion compiled recently by the the EPA
 [13] indicates that alcohols, aldehydes,
ketones, chlorinated hydrocarbons,
organic acids, acid chlorides,  phenols
and other  soluble organics tend to
increase set times for some mixes,  and
cause  consistently reduced durability in
the solidified product.   Extraction of
the organic components cited  is listed
 in the EPA report as a removal  method
which also has the advantages of volume
reduction and conversion to nonhazardous
material.

     Thus  current methods are  improving
 and can accomplish detoxification of
most types of waste, and mobile scale
 design and testing is in progress for
 some applications to allow on-site pro-
 cessing.   However, even where the tech-
 nology is adequate, the costs for the
 large-scale operations needed to impact
 even a portion of the sites on the
 National Priorities List alone is pro-
 hibitive.

 RESULTS OF ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDIES

     The scope of these investigations
 encompasses the design and evaluation of
 mobile SCF units for the treatment of
 contaminated soils, organic removal from
 sludges,  and the regeneration of spent
 GAC.  Common features of the designs
 include modularization for ease of
 transportation,  and include the produc-
 tion of a concentrated toxin discharge
 stream for chemical detoxification  (such
 as by dehydrohalogenation).  Each system
 consists of two essentially independent
 segments:  a continuous SCF flow loop to
 control fluid density by step  changes in
 pressure, for continuous removal of
 extracted organics, and a semi-batch or
 continuous contactor.
                                            -368-

-------
    In the design and cost estimations
presented here, we have drawn on the
available thermodynaraic data and mathe-
matical models, as well as on the very
limited rate information available, and
where uncertainty existed, made rather
conservative contingency assumptions.
Thus we consider that the unit costs for
processing put forth here may have an
uncertainty as large as a factor of two.
Nonetheless, the SCF technology appears
to be so economically attractive that
even a doubling of the estimated costs
would represent very substantial savings
over current technology.

Soil Systems

    Soil detoxification is the most com-
plicated of the three types of waste
treatment problems studied.  It may
require site excavation to 10 feet or
more to achieve complete removal of con-
taminants;  pretreatment is required to
screen large rocks and grind wood; and
varying moisture levels necessitate pro-
cess flexibility.  Each factor leads to
more peripheral equipment, which exacer-
bates both the processing and mobility
problems.

    Constraints for this design include
the limitation to a total of six semi-
trailers, including pretreatment, labo-
ratory, and control room facilities.
Other design bases include semi-batch
operation of the contactor units and a
set ratio of 8 Ibs. SCF/lb. soil treated
in the detoxification cycle {for pure
COg solvent).  The latter condition
(possibly too conservative) is based on
the preliminary results reported by
Knopf et al. at Louisiana State Univer-
sity [14]. Under these conditions high-
way weight limits result in treatment
capacity of 50 yds /day (2.1 yds /hr.).
If necessary permits could be obtained
(as seems likely) for 2095 overweight on
one trailer, the capacity could be
expanded by 78% (3.7 yds /hr, or 89
yds /day).  The design results are
summarized in Table I and Figure 2.

Sludge Systems

    Organics removal from high-metal
sludges has the potential to be a vastly
simpler process if the sludge is pump-
able, so that completely continuous
 countercurrent processing can be used.
 Data are limited at  this point,  but  it
 appears that capital costs might be  com-
 parable to those for SCF soil process-
 ing, and operating costs could be a  bit
 more favorable in  a  continuous process.

 GAG Systems

     The handling of  leachates and
 groundwaters is  really just an applica-
 tion of the GAG  technology.   These gen-
 erally represent  a  situation where  the
 contaminant is  dilute,  and a two-step
 separation is appropriate.   Thus one
 would  envision  an adsorption on GAC,
 followed by SCF regeneration.

     The regeneration of spent GAC is
 essentially just a simplified version of
 the soil treatment process because any
 screening or grinding pretreatment oper-
 ations are unnecessary. The solids are
 more homogenous so less variations in
 processing are required. They are also
 more flowable,  which facilitates easier
 semi-batch or even continuous operation
 of the separator modules. Finally the
 volume to be treated is normally much
 less.   We have developed a design for a
 mobile unit carried on just two trailers
 with a regeration capacity of 500
 Ibs./hr. (dry basis), and we have used
 the same flow ratio that we have used
 previously in stationary plants, 2O  Ibs.
 SCF/lb.dry GAC.  Capital and operating
 costs have been scaled from the designs
 for soil detoxification, and the eco-
 nomic summary is given in Table II.

     To  calculate return on  investment we
 have made the rather conservative
 assumption that  the  total cost of
 thermal regeneration and make-up GAC to
 offset  capacity  reduction are at least
 35c/lb.   The minimum net gain is then at
 least 20C/lb, since  GAC regeneration by
 SCF processing is  estimated at 15$/lb.

 CONCLUSIONS

    From these economic  studies, it is
 easily concluded that supercritical
 extraction offers an attractive alterna-
 tive to several current hazardous mate-
 rials treatment methods.  However,
 before construction of a full-scale
 operational mobile detoxification unit
 based on SCF technology, an intermediate
bench scale or pilot unit should be con-
                                         -369-

-------
structed and operated on a batch or
semi-batch basis.

    The following points should be taken
into consideration.  The results of the
above research should be incorporated
into any design and the best system to
use for the initial study would be a
unit for regeneration of GAG. The unit
should be sized so that only one scal-
e-up step is needed, which means a
bench-scale unit processing 50-100
Ibs/day of GAC (dry basis). The unit
should be operated over a wide range of
operating conditions and the possibility
of a continuous contactor for flowable
GAC in contact with a supercritical
fluid should be investigated.

REFERENCES

1.  K. P. Johnston and C. A. Eckert,
    AIChE Journal 27, 418, 1981.
2.  K. P. Johnston, D. H. Ziger, and C.
    A. Eckert, Ind. Enq. Chem. Fundamen-
    tals 21 191 (1982).
3.  D. H. Ziger and C. A. Eckert, Ind.
    Enq. Chem. Process Des. Develop. 22,
    582 (1983).
4.  C. A. Eckert, D. H. Ziger, K. P.
    Johnston, and T. K. Ellison, Fluid
    Phase Equilibria 14, 167 (1983).
5.  C. A. Eckert, Materials Research
    Society Svmp. Proc. 22, II, 81
    (1984).
6.  C. A. Eckert, J. G. Van Alsten, and
    T. Stoicos, Env. Sci. Tech. 20, 319
    (1986).
7.  C. A. Eckert, D. H. Ziger, K. P.
    Johnston, and S. Kim, J. Phvs. Chem.
    86, 2738  (1986).
8.  S. W. Gilbert and C. A. Eckert,
    Fluid Phase Equilibria 30. 41
    (1986).
9.  C.  A. Eckert, P. C. Hansen, and T.
    K. Ellison, Fluid Phase Equilibria,
    in press.
10. C. A. Eckert, B. S. Hess, and J. G.
    Van Alsten, Fluid Phase Equilibria,
    in press.
11. C. P. Eppig, R. P. deFilippi and R.
    J. Robey, Project Sumnary,
    EPA-6OO/2-82-O67, Washington, D. C.,
    1981.
12. R. P. deFilippi and R. J. Robey,
    Project Summary, EPA-600/52-83-038,
    Washington, D. C., 1983.
    13.  JACA Corp.,  Technical Report, EPA
        Contract No.  68-03-3186, Cincinnati,
        OH,  1986.
    14.  F.. C. Knopf,  B.  Brady, and F. R.
        Groves,  CRC  Crit. Rev. Environ.
        Control  15,  (3), 237  (1985).
      15.0


      12.5
      10.0
   01
   V)
       7.5
      5.0
       2.5
SOLVENT'
  C02+I%CH3OH
                      SOLVENT*  PURE C02
                    I
   I
I
         50       150      250       350
                    PRESSURE (BAR)
       Fig.  1   Entrainer  effect on
                selectivity:  The
                supercritical fluid
                extraction of acridinfe
                from phenanthiene.
-370-

-------
                                                             o
                                                            •H
                                                            <*-!  TJ
                                                             !«!  3 T3
                                                             O  .-I  W  O


                                                            O -H 4J
                                                            §
-371-

-------
                TABLE I
    SCF EXTRACTION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL

Design Basis: 2.1 yd3/hr., 250 days/yr.
CAPITAL COSTS
    EQUIPMENT
    ENGINEERING AND SUPERVISION
    CONSTRUCTION
    CONTINGENCY
    WORKING CAPITAL
    TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT

OPERATING COSTS
DIRECT COSTS:
     Solvent
     Labor
     Direct Supervision
     Utilities
     Maintenance and Repairs
     Operating Supplies
     Laboratory Costs

FIXED CHARGES:
     Depreciation
     Taxes and Insurance
     Plant Overhead
     Administrative Costs
     Financing

CONTINGENCY FOR TRANSPORTATION:

TOTAL PRODUCT COST:

         UNIT COST = S98.74/YD3
                                   1-45
                                   0.15
                                   O.15
                                   0.20
                                   0.25
                                   2.20

                                  MS/YR

                                   10.8
                                  225.0
                                   30.0
                                  170.4
                                  110.0
                                   11.0
                                   30.0
                                  587.2
                                  1234.2
 COST FOR MOBILE INCINERATOR    $5OO/yd
 ANNUAL PRETAX PROFIT           S5.02MM
 RETURN ON  INVESTMENT            228*
 PAYOUT TIME                  5.3 MONTHS
                TABLE II
  SCF REGENERATION OF CONTAMINATED GAG

Design Basis:  500 Ibs/hr GAG, dry basis
         10,000 Ibs/hr CO. recirculation
         250 days/year operation
                 16 ft3)
CAPITAL COSTS:
    Vessels (4
    Main SCF Loop
    Recovery System
    Cooling Tower
    Material Handling, Conveyors
    Process Trailer
    Analytical/Office Trailer
Direct Capital Investment
    Engineering and Supervision
    Construction Expense
    Contingency
FIXED CAPITAL INVESTMENT
    Working Capital
TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT
 216.0
 213.4
  65.4
   6.0
  15.8
  15.0
 100.0
, 634.6
  50.0
  50.0
  50.0
 784.6
 100.Q
$884.6
OPERATING COSTS:                  	M$
DIRECT COSTS:
    Makeup CO                       2.5
    Labor (4 @ 25,000)            100.0
    Supervision (% @ 30,000)       15.0
    Utilities                      39.5
    Maintenance and Repairs        44.2
    Operating Supplies              4.4
    Laboratory Costs               30.0
                                  235.6
FIXED CHARGES:
    Depreciation                   63.5
    Taxes and Insurance            15.7
  ,  Plant Overhead                 31.8
    Administrative                 10.0
    Financing                      88.5
TOTAL PRODUCT COST                445.1

      UNIT COST: 14.80/lb dry GAG

    CURRENT TECHNOLOGY:  Thermal regen-
eration costs at a minimum 35
-------
                       SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION AND CATALYTIC
                          OXIDATION OF TOXIC  ORGANICS FROM SOILS

                 -Kerry M.  Dooley1,  Robert Gambrell2  and  F.  Carl Knopf1

                           Department of  Chemical Engineering1
                          : ,    Department  of  Marine Science2
                                Louisiana  State University
                               Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70803
                                          **
                                        ABSTRACT

      Supercritical  fluid  (SCF)  extraction  is a promising new technique for the cleanup of
 soils,  sediments, and  sludges that are  contaminated with hazardous wastes.  In this
 investigation,  supercritical carbon dioxide  (SC-CO ) has been used to extract PCBs, DDT
 and  toxaphene from  contaminated topsoils and subsoils.  An attractive feature of this  '
 process is that the CO ,  being  virtually inert, leaves no solvent residue on the
 processed soil.

      In our initial extraction  studies, supercritical CO  at 100 atm and 40°C was
 continuously passed through a fixed bed of 10 g of soil.  Approximately 70% of the DDT
 and  75% of the  toxaphene  could  be leached from a topsoil (12.6% organic matter)
 contaminated with 1000 ppm DDT  and 400 ppm toxaphene in under ten minutes using SC-CO  at
 a rate of 0.7 g/s.  The extraction  of contaminated (with 1000 ppm Aroclor 1254) subsoil "
 (0.74% organic  matter) proved to be even more promising, because more than 90% of the
 PCBs  could be extracted in under one minute at the same CO  rate.

      Recently SC-C02 with a single entrainer*, either methanol or toluene, was compared
 to pure C02; comparison was made on the basis of extraction rate and the removal
 efficiency for  DDT  or  PCBs from contaminated topsoils.  The supercritical mixtures at 100
 atm and 40°C were continuously  passed through a fixed bed'of 10 g of soil.  The most
 effective solvent system, SC-C02 with 5 wt% methanol at a flowrate of 0.7 g/s, was able
 to leach 95% of the DDT from the soil in under 5 minutes, as compared to either pure CO
 or C02 with 5 wt% toluene at the same conditions, which resulted in only 70% extraction2
 in 10 minutes.  This same extraction mixture (SC-CO  with 5 wt% methanol) was also
 applied to a highly contaminated spill site topsoil containing ca. 3500 ppm Aroclor 1260
and 2100 ppm Aroclor 1242.
minutes.
Over 98% extraction of the contaminants was realized in 10
     With the demonstrated ability to extract contaminants from soils using supercritical
C02 with an entrainer, a logical further treatment would be the destruction of the wastes
while they are in the supercritical phase.  An evaluation of catalysts for the low
temperature (below 350°C) oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and chlorinated
hydrocarbon wastes in the SCF phase will be presented.
 An entrainer is a volatile organic compound which, when added in low levels to super-
critical C02, dramatically increases the solubilities of certain nonvolatile orcanics in
the SCF.
JUA.
  To whom correspondence should be addressed.
                                          -373-

-------
INTRODUCTION
frustrated some applications.
     Supercritical fluid (SCF) extrac-
tion has received much attention as a
technique for separating relatively non-
volatile materials (Paulaitis et al.,
1982).  Typically in SCF extraction a
solvent gas such as carbon dioxide, at
high pressure and moderate temperature,
is contacted with a solid or liquid phase.
Slight changes in the system temperature
or pressure can cause large changes in
the solvent density and consequently in
its ability to solubilize relatively
nonvolatile components.  For example, at
200 atm and 35°C the density of C02
approaches 0.8 g/cc and at these condi-
tions a solute such as naphthalene would
have a solubility some 10,000 times that
predicted if C0_ behaved as an ideal gas.
By taking advantage of these facts a
process can be envisioned whereby manipu-
lation of the system pressure effects
extraction of a nonvolatile material.  A
pressure letdown, to a pressure below the
system critical conditions, can cause
near  complete precipitation of the
relatively nonvolatile material from the
solvent.  In addition to the liquid-like
densities of a typical SCF, viscosities
and molecular diffusivities of SCFs are
intermediate to typical liquid and gas
values for these properties.  For these
reasons the extraction efficiencies of
SCFs  are usually higher than those of
liquids.

      The many advantageous properties  of
SCFs  have opened up new technologies  in
environmental control; the subject has
been  recently reviewed by Groves, Brady
and Knopf  (1985).  Successful efforts
have  included the use  of SCFs in:  the
regeneration of adsorbents contaminated
with  volatile organics using pure  SC-C02
 (Eppig  et  al.,  1981);  oxidation  of
organic contaminants in waste streams
using SC-water  (Modell,  1982); liquid-
liquid  extraction  of waste streams again
using pure CO-  as  the  extraction medium
 (Ringhand  andTCopf ler,  1983); the  extrac-
tion/reaction  comprising  the  generation
of low  sulfur  chars  from  coals utilizing
either  SC-toluene or SC-alcohols
 (Vasilakos et  al.,  1985);  and finally the
 regeneration with SC-CO  of  activated
 carbon  used in the cleanup  of liquid
waste streams  (de Filippi et al.,  1980a).
The regeneration of activated carbon was
 not universally practical, because the
buildup of irreversibly bound organics
     We are currently examining the
capabilities of supercritical fluids to
extract toxic chemicals such as DDT and
PCBs from soils, thereby providing a tool
for cleaning up hazardous waste sites.
Such removal offers the obvious advantage
of the creation of a much smaller volume
if further treatment such as combustion,
biological degradation or other disposal
method is desired.

     In conventional extraction technology
the pressure would be reduced subsequent
to extraction, precipitating a solid or
liquid phase rich in organic contaminants
from the CO..  In order to recycle the
C0_, the contaminant level in the CO- must
often be further reduced by distillation
(deFilippi et al, 1980b).  In addition,
since the pressure of the CO- has been
substantially lowered, recompression is
necessary.

     In conjunction with our work with SC-
CO  plus entrainers, we are investigating
an alternative to the above separation
scheme.  We are attempting to totally
oxidize the extracted organic contaminants
by passing the high pressure mixture plus
air over total oxidation catalysts  such as
CuO.  Temperatures necessary for total
oxidation should be in the 420-600  K
range, this being characteristic of free-
radical assisted autoxidation processes
(Schuit and Gates, 1980).  After drying
to  remove the water formed in the
reactions, and neutralization, both of
which  can be  accomplished at high
pressure, the CO- can be recycled with
small  recompression costs.

     In order to  explain the extraction
process, the  thermodynamics  involved,  and
oxidation  catalysis in  a supercritical
fluid  medium, this paper is  divided into
two sections.   The  first discusses  back-
ground,  including early SCF  extraction
results  and  the  phase  equilibria  expected
for the  ternary system  of CO -methane1-DDT
 (here  methanol  is  an  entrainer),  and
briefly  introduces  both reactions  in SCFs
and catalytic autoxidation  of  priority
pollutants.   The second section presents
 recent data on the  effectiveness  of CO-
with entrainers for the extraction of  DDT
 and PCBs  from topsoils  of high organic
 content.   Some  preliminary  data showing
 the solid-catalyzed partial oxidation  of a
 pollutant (toluene)...in a SCF are  also
                                            -374-

-------
presented.
PAST RESULTS

     In previous work  (Brady et al.,
1987) we investigated  the use of pure SC-
CO- to extract PCB's,  DDT and toxaphene
from a contaminated topsoil (12.6%
organic matter) and subsoil (0.74%
organic matter).  Experiments with SC-
CO- continuously flowing through a fixed
bea of 10 grams of contaminated soils
showed that over 90% of the PCBs (original
contamination level 1000 ppm) could be
extracted from the subsoil in under one
minute using a CO. flowrate of 0.7 g/s.
However, only 70% of the DDT and 75% of
the toxaphene could be leached from the
topsoil contaminated with 1000 ppm DDT
and 400 ppm toxaphene  in 10 minutes at
the same C02 rate.  These results are
not unexpected in that pure SC-CO-,
being a relatively nonpolar solvent,
would show only non-specific van der
Waals interactions with adsorbed
compounds that may be  strongly bound to
polar sites on the topsoil.  The
presence of these sites is consistent
with the high organic  content of the
topsoil.  Mixed solvents, for example CO-
and a few wt% of a polar entrainer, coula
result in specific chemical attraction of
adsorbate and extraction medium, and thus
enhance contaminant extraction from
solids containing polar adsorption sites,
such as activated carbon or topsoils of
high organic content;                  ^
PHASE DIAGRAMS

    • The "entrainer"  solvents  used  in
this work to date are toluene  and
methanol.  By using the Peng-Robinson
cubic equation of state  (Peng  and
Robinson, 1976), the  triangular  phase
diagram for the ternary system CO--DDT-
'nethanol at 40°C, 100 atm can  be
constructed as shown  in Figure 1.

     It is assumed the solubility of the
solvent (CO  with methanol)  in solid DDT
(component 2) is negligible.   The solid
phase is considered pure  DDT,  and its
fugacity f-   in phase equilibria
calculations was evaluated from
 assuming the Peng-Robinson equation is
 valid for calculating the-fugacity of the
 pure subcooled liquid (f° ).   The critical
 points are calculated according to the
 algorithm proposed by Heideman and Khalil
 (1980).

      At 40°C and 100 atm, the addition of
 a  small amount of toluene or methanol to
.CO  increases the DDT solubility.  The
 solubility of DDT in a mixed solvent of 95
 wt% CO.  and 5 wt% toluene is estimated as
 2.5 x 10   (~3.6 times the value in pure
 C02).   If toluene is replaced by methanol
 the estimated DDT solubility from Figure 1
 is 0.01 (~14 times that in pure CO-).
 Therefore a mixed solvent with 95 wt% CO-
 and 5 wt% methanol should be more
 effective in extracting DDT from soil than
 a  mixed solvent with 95 wt% C02 and 5 wt%
 toluene, although the latter is still a
 more effective solvent than pure CO-.  The
 approximate supercritical phase composi-
 tions for the ternary system at the
 operating conditions are summarized in
 Table I.  The interaction parameter k..
 (k. . = 0.07) was empirically determine*! by
 regressing VLB data for the binary system
 of CO- plus methanol (Semenova et al.,
 1979).  The phases present ("conditions")
 are denoted by either SFE (solid and SCF at
 equilibrium), or SLVE (solid-liquid-vapor
 phases at equilibrium).
      Table I.  Couposttions of Supercritical Fluid Phases fo;
            C02-Entrainer-DDT-Syste«s
  Systei
C02(l) •)• DDT(2) 0.07
DDT(2) + Methanol 0
C02 + DDT + Hethanol

y2 = 0.7 X 10~3 .-
y2 = 0.3 x io"3
X2 = 0.055 X3 = 0.132
y2 = 0.014 y3 = 0.079
SFE
SFE
SLVE

                                    ritical pt
                      Vo1 - v°s
                       2  V2
                                    CD
 REACTIONS IN SUPERCRITICAL SOLVENTS

    .  Supercritical fluids have potential
 advantages as solvents  in coal lique-
 faction,  high temperature thermal.
 condensations and alkylations, catalyzed
 hydrocarbon isomerizations,  and oxidation
 reactions.  The application of SGF
 solvents  improves the final product
 distributions of these  reactions,
 sometimes by diminishing heat and  mass
 transport limitations,  and sometimes by
 allowing  separation of  desired products
 prior to  further reaction in a solid or
 liquid phase.  Currently, the most
                                           -375-

-------
promising application of SCF as reaction
media is coal liquefaction/extraction,
where the condensed extract is a fuel or
chemical feedstock comparable to
hydrogen-intensive processes.   These
findings have prompted a growing interest
in reactions using supercritical fluid
media, the subject has been recently
reviewed (Subramaniam and McHugh, 1986).
                           •^>
     The utility of SCF,as reaction
media, apart from their utility in coal
processing, is documented.  SCF have
proven feasible as reaction media for high
temperature deep oxidations (Modell,
1982), where SC water homogenizes heavy
organic-air-salt mixtures and thereby
enhances combustion efficiencies.

     SCF have also proven feasible as
reaction media for hydrocarbon isomeriza-
tion processes, either with a homogeneous
or heterogeneous catalyst (Kramer and
Leder, 1975, Tiltscher et al., 1981). The
details of the isomerization processes
are sketchy but interesting.  In the
homogeneous process, the SC paraffin
reactant solubilizes not only the most
efficient catalyst, AlBr3, but also H_,
which controls the selectivity of this
reaction by suppressing cracking rates *
Isoraerization-to-crackirig ratios of
better than 50 were obtained at optimum
reaction conditions.

     Finally, Metzger et al. (1983) have
found that many compounds containing
carbonyls or double bonds will undergo
condensation and alkylation reactions at
temperatures not much above their
critical temperatures, in the 300-600K
range.  At these conditions they
prepared, for example, the cyclohexane
addition products to acrylonitrile,
heptene-1, and methyl acrylate in high
yields.  The intermediates in these
reactions were remarkable stable with
respect to polymerization.

     In summary, it has been observed
that SCF provide favorable reaction media
in the following cases:

      (1)  Where homogenization of the
          reaction mixture removes dif-
          fusion limitations for a key
          reactant, catalyst, or promoter;

      (2)  Where the SCF separate unstable
          products of reaction from a
          solid or liquid phase.
     (3)  Where the SCF play a direct
          role in reaction,  say,  in the
          stabilization .of free radicals
          or other intermediates,  or
          assisting in the transfer of
          hydrogen.

     (4)  Where the SCF aid in the
          solubilization of reaction
          products that could result in
          catalyst deactivation.
TOTAL CATALYTIC OXIDATION OF PRIORITY
POLLUTANTS

     The chemical behavior with respect to
catalytic total oxidation of the many
compounds listed as priority pollutants
(U.S. EPA, 1980b; Robertson et al., 1980)
is so diverse that not all compound
classes could be studied.  This is true
even if we restrict ourselves to single
model compounds or well-characterized
mixtures of homologous compounds.  Our
attention has been focused on three
classes of difficult-to-oxidize compounds:
(1)  Single-ring  aromatics  with
deactivating  side  groups,  such  as
chlorobenzenes, chlorobenzidines, and
nitrophenols; (2) Fused-ring polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) such as
anthracene and benzanthrene; (3) Chlori-
nated biphenyls and naphthenic compounds
such as DDT, PCBs, and dieldrin.  Our
catalytic oxidation Work is not performed
independently of the entrainer studies;
feeds to be oxidized include the
entrainer, which in some cases will be
oxidized as well.  Entrainer oxidation is
often desirable, since in free radical
processes small molecules that can form
radicals easily (acetone, for example)
help initiate the more difficult free
radical oxidations of the refractory
compounds.  Such oxidizable initiators are
known as co-oxidants and represent a more
economical solution to the initiation
problem than do such common initiators as
peroxides.

     We have examined total oxidation by
free-radical-assisted redox processes,
which are well known for the partial
oxidations of alkylaromatic and naphthenic
hydrocarbons in aqueous or organic
solutions; the reaction mechanisms and
applicable catalysts are exhaustively
surveyed by Kaeding et al. (1970), Sheldon
and Kochi (1974), Schuit and Gates (1980),
and Parshall (1980).  The catalysts are
                                         -376-

-------
organometallic  r|dox Couples  containing,
for  example,  Co  /Co   .Peroxides  and
hydroperoxides  are  the primary products,
which decompose to  more  stable products
at temperatures above about 80-100°C.
Typical pathways  for a typical reaction,
the  oxidation of  toluene to benzaldehyde/
benzoic acid, are given  in Fig. 2.   In
the  presence  of acids, condensation  takes
place concurrently  with oxidation,
resulting  in  the  production of phenols
and  acetates.   A  typical pathway for
toluene Oxidation is given below:
 species  present in the  feed,  if the
 amount of catalyst employed  is  large
 enough.   One way in which  olefinic,
 aromatic,  and other double-bond
 containing molecules can be  totally
 oxidized is through free-radical
 epoxidation on a surface or  even by
 desorbed radicals in the fluid-phase
 (Haber,  1985):
                                                   R0_- + R'C = CR" -> RO.
                 I
                 C - C - R" -» JO- + K' - C - C - S"
                I  o
              H*
                <—?(
     The processes and catalysts common
to solution can be adapted to a dense ,gas
(supercritical) phase and certain solid
heterogeneous catalysts.  We have
demonstrated this in a recently completed
study of the oxidation of toluene to   *
benzaldehyde with feeds composed mostly
of supercritical CO  and some air (Dooley
and Knopf, 1986).  Not, all redox-
containing catalysts are effective; in
fact, in catalytic reaction experiments
employing a series of Co and Co-Mo oxides
supported on Al 0 2+onlv+one catalyst
with a specific Co  /Co   initial ratio
was both active for partial oxidation and
inactive for the undesired condensation
reactions to polycyclic products.  For
this work the temperatures were in the
180-220°C range and the catalysts were
not modified with electron transfer
promoters (as they are in solution) to
enhance their activities.

     At slightly higher temperatures and
with the inclusion of electron transfer
promoters in the solid catalyst,
peroxides and hydrogen peroxides are more
easily produced and then ruptured at the
0-0 bond.  The rupture results in a net
increase in the number of free radicals
and therefore in a dramatic increase in
oxidation rates.  Schuit and Gates (1980)
have shown that at these conditions the
total concentration of peroxides and
hydroperoxides is proportional to the
exponential of the product of the rate
of formation of all products times the
reactor residence time.   Therefore once
initiated this process must result in
complete oxidation of all oxidizable
     The reason why total oxidation is not
more prevalent in solution is that the
reaction conditions are carefully chosen
to inhibit this generally undesired
reaction:  the solutions are 0- starved
due to the low solubilities of low-
pressure air in most organics, and the
solutions often contain polar compounds
(acetic acid, for example) which act as
free radical traps.  Both of these limits
on total oxidation will be removed in the
proposed process.  The upper limit on
free-radical-assisted total oxidation is
about 300-350°C; above these temperatures
the reverse rates of hydroperoxide
formation reactions are large enough that
oxidation must take place by other routes.

     Simple oxides may not catalyze the
total oxidation of refractory aromatic and
naphthenic compounds.  The ideal catalyst
must be able to adsorb the hydrocarbon by
electron' transfer to or from a metal
cation site, to insert electrophilic
oxygen to form aldehydes or epoxides, and
finally to decompose these to carbon
oxides.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR SCF SOIL
EXTRACTIONS

     Two contaminated topsoils were
obtained for our extraction experiments.
The first topsoil was obtained from a DDT
spill site near Lake Providence,
Louisiana.  The second topsoil was
obtained from a PCB spill site.  The soils
were air-dried (35°C) and the initial DDT
or PCB levels checked via EPA-approved
test procedures (U.S. EPA, 1980; 1982).

     A schematic diagram of the SC-CO.
extraction apparatus is given in Figure 3.
Liquid CO^ at ambient temperature is fed
                                          -377-

-------
to a diaphragm compressor  and compressed.
to a pressure between 200  and 350 atm.
The compressed C02  is stored in surge
tanks to dampen any pressure fluctua-
tions.  From the  surge  tanks the C02
flows at ~0.7 g/s to a  vertical tube
fixed bed containing the contaminated
soil; the pressure  here is controlled to
±5 psi.  Upstream of the vertical tube,
approximately 5 wt% of  either toluene or
mcthanol are combined with the super-
critical C0_ by the use of a Ruska high-
pressure metering pump. In the tube the
fixed bed of contaminated  soil is
contacted by the  mixed  solvent.  The
extraction  pressure is  monitored by a
Heise digital pressure  gauge. Both the
feed line and the fixed bed are immersed
in a constant temperature  bath maintained
at 40 ± 1°C.  Downstream of the bed two
micrometering valves  are used to control
the  solvent flow rate and reduce the
pressure to atmospheric.  The extract
mixture is  first passed through two dry
ice/acetone cold traps  to collect the
precipitated contaminants,  followed by an
activated  carbon trap,  and  finally by a
dry test meter to totalize  the  solute-
free CO-.   All wetted parts  of  the
apparatus  are stainless steel,  teflon, or
viton.

      The residual  concentration of DDT or
PCBs in the soil is measured according to
EPA-approved test procedures (U.S. EPA,
 1980;  1982).  Typically 5 g of  soil  are
weighed to ± 0.01  g into  cellulose
 extraction thimbles, which  are  placed  in
 a Soxhlet apparatus and extracted for  8
 hours with a 60/40 mixture  of acetone/
 hexane.  The acetone/hexane extracts are
 then washed with water to remove acetone,
 and the hexane portion is subjected to
 florisil cleanup and finally diluted with
 hexane as necessary for analysis by gas
 chromatography.
 SCF EXTRACTION OF DDT CONTAMINANTED
 TOPSOIL - RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

      The initial DDT level of the
 contaminated topsoil was 1271 mg/kg.
 Extractions  of this test soil showed that
 approximately 60-70% of the DDT could be
 removed in  approximately 10-20 minutes as
 shown  in Figure 4.  Longer-time
 extractions  using pure SC-C02 did not
 show any  improvement over this reduction.
 These  data  imply that a portion of the
 DDT is strongly bound to the soil and
that SC-CO- at these conditions  cannot
extract this strongly-bound DDT.

     Using the same extraction conditions
as with pure SC-CO- (40°C, 100 atm,  flow
rate ~ 315 cm3/s at 25°C,  1 atm),  the two
mixed solvent systems  (CO^-toluene and
CO -methanol) were investigated.   These
data are plotted in Figure 4  along with
the extraction data obtained  using pure
SC-CO, solvent.  Little  if any improvement
in extraction efficiency is observed upon
comparing the data for SC-CO  with 5 wt%
toluene to that for pure SC-CO,.   A
maximum of 60-70% of the DDT  can be
removed in 10-20 minutes with either
solvent system.  Extraction with SC-C02
and 5 wt% methanol, however,  is  more
successful.  Approximately 95% of the
contaminants can be removed  in 5 minutes
or less  (Figure 4).  These results imply
that  for maximum  extraction  efficiency a
mixed solvent  system  should  be used, where
the entrainer  or  co-solvent  is tailored to
the soil type  and the  solute being
extracted.

      To  determine the  rate-limiting-step
of the extraction process, we also carried
out extractions  of DDT-contaminated
topsoils at  various SC-CO_ flowrates,
while maintaining the metfianol entrainer
composition at 5  wt%.   These results are
presented  in Table II.  The data  indicate
that  the process  is apparently not
external-transfer limited (in the fluid
phase).
   Table II. Variation of Soil Concentration in the Extraction of DDT-
         Contaminatcd. Spill-Site Topsoil using SOCO, with 5 vtt,
         Hethanol
   Conditions: AO°C, 100 atm, 470 and 47 cmVsec
   Extraction Time
     (min)
 470 craVsec
@ 25°C, 1 atm
47 cmVsec
8 25°C, atm
0

1
1
2
2
5
5
10
10
1271
*
221, 207
222, 236
82, 105
9S, 94
66, 58
58, 61
52, 37
59, 48
1271

"
	
	
	
60
	
	
	
      20

      40

      60

      120
                   86

                   34

                   51

                   25
    Multiple entries in concentration column are replicate analyses.
                                             -378-

-------
SCF EXTRACTION OF PCB CONTAMINATED
TOPSOIL -. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
     To again demonstrate the effective-
ness of SC-CO  with 5 wt% methanol, this
solvent system was used to extract a
spill site topsoil containing ca. 3,500
ppm Aroclor 1260 and 2,100 ppm Aroclor
1242.  The results, plotted in Figure 5,
show over 98% removal of the contaminant
is possible within a 10 minute extraction
period.
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR SCF OXIDATION
STUDIES.

     We are currently investigating the
oxidation of toluene with redox
catalysts, using the system shown in Fig.
6.  CO- is compressed to slightly above
critical conditions (T  = 31°C and P  -
72.8 atm), and at a flow rate of 1 g/s is
mixed with toluene delivered by a
metering pump and air from a cylinder.
All flow rates are controlled by metering
valves.  The reaction mixture is ca. 1.5
wt% toluene, 1.5% oxygen, 5% N   and 92%
C02, and is controlled at 30-3DO°C ±1°C
by encasing the reactor (V1 o.d. tube
with a fritted disk) in an insulated heat
source (4" o.d. heated alumnium block).  '
For the initial experiments the pressure
at the reactor was 80 atm although the
reactor is capable of pressures in excess
of 300 atm.

     Before the reactor, the air/CO.
ratio and toluene/CO- ratio are checked
by on-line sample injection into a gas
chromatograph with a thermal conductivity
detector; after the reactor, product
samples are injected into an on-line gas
chromatograph interfaced to a mass
spectrometer (Extrel Model ELQ 400) for
detailed analysis.  The products are then
cooled by expansion through a heated
micro-metering valve.  The uncondensed
CO  is passed, through a totalizing meter.

     It was possible to dissolve 1.5 wt%
toluene and 6.5 wt% air in supercritical
C02 at 80 atm and 293-493K.  Using this
mixture the toluene could be oxidized at
low rates and conversions to benzalde-
hyde, benzyl alcohol, the cresol isomers,
and a lesser amount of condensation
products and carbon oxides.  A 5% CoO/
A1.03 catalyst, calcined at 200°C in
order to preclude oxidation to Co_0, and
the cobalt "aluminates", proved to be an
active and selective (for partial oxida-
tion) catalyst.  Its turnover number for
partial oxidation was about 10  /s at
473K.
SUMMARY

     We have reported the use of SC-CO-,
with either toluene or methanol as an
entrainer, for the extraction of DDT and
PCBs from contaminated topsoils.  The
extraction efficiency was shown to be a
strong function of the entrainer selected.
A supercritical mixture of C02 plus 5 wt%
toluene showed no improvement over CO.
alone, with only ~ 75% removal of the DDT
possible; the residual DDT was strongly
adsorbed on the soil.  However, near
complete removal of DDT was possible using
SC-C02 with 5 wt% methanol at 40°C and a
flowrate of 0.7 g/s.  The efficiency of
the C02-methanol system remained unchanged
with a large variation in flowrate, from 1
g/s to 0.1 g/s, demonstrating that no
external transfer resistances are present
at these conditions.  Near complete
removal of a mixture of Aroclor 1260 and
Aroclor 1242 was also possible using
SC-CO2 with 5 wt% methanol at 40°C and a
flowrate of 0.7 g/s.  Once these
contaminants have been dissolved in the
SCF phase, partial oxidation is feasible
if catalyzed by certain supported metal
oxides.  Further work on total oxidation
by supported mixed-metal oxides is in
progress.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     This study was supported in part by
Grant CR-809714 from the US Environmental
Protection Agency.  This support does not
signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views and policy of the.
Agency; no mention of trade names or
commerical products constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.  We acknowledge
the experimental assistant o'f DeAnn Leach
and James Torres.
NOMENCLATURE

F  '  = '   fluid phase
AH1  =
fugacity, atm

heat of fusion, cal/mol
                                          -379-

-------
k

L

P

R



S

T

V
interaction, parameter

liquid phase

pressure, atro

gas constant, 1.987 cal/mol-°K
or 82.06 atm-cm3/mol-°K or soil
particle radius, cm

solid phase

temp e rature, °K

vapor phase or molar volume,
cm3/mol
SUBSCRIPTS

m    =    melting point

o    =    initial value

1    =    supercritical solvent

2    =    solute


SUPERSCRIPT

o&  =    pure  subcooled  liquid

os  =    pure  solid


REFERENCES

Brady,  B.O.,  Kao,  C.-P.,  Gambrell,  R.P.,
     Dooley,  K.M.,  and Knopf,  F.C.,
     Ind. Eng.  Chem. Research, 26,  261
      (1987).

deFilippi, R.P., Krukonis,  V.J.,  Robey,
     R.J., and  Modell, M.,  EPA Report -
     600/2-80-054,  National Technical
     Information Service, Washington,
     D.C.,  1980a.

deFilippi, R.P.,  Krukonis,  V.J.,  Robey,
     R.J.,  and  Modell, M.,  United States
     EPA Report No. 600/2-80-054; EPA
     Office  of  Research and Development:
     Research Triangle Park, North
      Carolina,  1980b.

Dooley, K.M., and Knopf,  F.C., 1986,
      submitted  to Ind. Eng. Chem.
      Research.
Eppig, C.P., deFilippi, R.P.,  and Murphy,
     R.A.  United States EPA Report No.
     600/2-82-067; EPA Office of Research
     and Development:  Research Triangle
     Park, North Carolina, 1981.

Gates, B.C., Katzer, J.R., and Schuit,
     G.C.A., Ch. 4 of "Chemistry of
     Catalytic Processes," McGraw-Hill,
     1979.

Groves, F.R., Brady, B.O., and Knopf,
     F.C., CRC Reviews in Env. Control
     15, 237 (1985).

Haber, J., ACS Symp. Ser. 279, 3 (1985).

Heideman, R.A., Khalil, A.M., AIChE J 26,
     769  (1980).

Kaeding, W.W., Lindblom, R.O., Temple,
     R.G., and Mahon, H.I., Ind. Eng.
     Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 4, 97 (1965).

Kramer,  G.M. and Leder, F., U.S. Patent
     3,880,945  (1975).

Metzger, J_0., Hartmanns, J., Malwitz, D.,
     and Koll, P. in "Chemical Engineering
     at  Supercritical Fluid Conditions,"
     Paulaitis, M.E., Penninger, J.M.,
     Gray, R.D., and Davidson, P.  (eds.),
     p.  515  (1983).

Modell,  M., Gaudet,  G.G., Simson,  M.,
     Hong,  G.T., and Biemann, K.,  Eighth
     Annual Research Symp. Land Disposal,
      Incineration and Treatment of
     Hazardous Waste, Ft. Mitchell,
     March  8 to  10,  1982.

Parshall, G.W.,  Chs. 7  and  10 of
      "Homogeneous Catalysis," Wiley,  1980.

Paulaitis,  M.E., Krukonis, V.J., Kurnik,
      R.T.,  and  Reid, R.C., Rev. Chem. Eng.
      I,  1791  (1982).

Peng,  D.Y;  Robinson, D.B.,  Ind. Eng.  Chem.
      Fundam.  15,  59 (1976).

Ringhand, P.H.  and  Kopfler, F.C.,  186th
      National Meeting  of the  American
      Chemical  Society,  Washington, D.C.,
      August 28  to September 3,  1983.

Robertson,  J.H.,  Cowen, W.F.,  and
      Longfield,  J.Y.,  Chem.  Eng.,  June  30,
      1980,  p.  102.

 Schuit,  G.C.A.  and Gates, B.C., pp. 461-
      475 of "Chemistry and Chemical
                                           -300-

-------
     Engineering of Catalytic Processes,'
     R. Prins and G.C.A. Schuit, Eds.,
     Sijthoff and Nordhoff, 1980.
Semenova, A.I., Emel'yanova, E.A.,
     Tsimmerman, S.S., and Tsiklis, D.S.,
     p'"--  J. Phys. Chem. 53, 1428
Russ.
     (1979).

Sheldon, R.A. and Kochi, J.K., Adv.
     Catal. 25, 272 (1974).

Subramaniam, B. and McHugh, M.A., Ind.
     Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 25, 1
     (1986).

Tiltscher, H., Wolf, H., and Schelschorn,
     J., Angew. Cfaem. Int. Ed. Engl. 20,
     892 (1981).

U.S. EPA; "Interim Methods for the
     Sampling and Analysis of Priority
     Pollutants in Sediments and Fish
     Tissue"; U.S. EPA, Environmental
     Monitoring and Support Laboratory:
     Cincinnati, Ohio, 1980.

U.S. EPA, "Priority Pollutant Frequency
     listing Tabulations and Descriptive
     Statistics", U.S. EPA, Effluent
     Guidelines Division, 1980b.

U.S. EPA 600/4-82-057; "Qrganochlorine
     Presticides and PCB's-Method 608";
     U.S. EPA Environmental Montioring
     and Support Laboratory:  Cincinnati,
     Ohio, 1982.

Vasilakos, N.P., Dobbs, J.M., and Parisi,
     A.S.  Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des.
     Dev. 24. 121 (1985).
                                          -381-

-------
                                     2(DDT)
         35 C
         40*C
I(COz)
                                                                           3(CH3OH)
       Figure 1.      Phase behavior of the ternary system of CO~-DDT-methanol
                      at 35°C and 40°C, 100 atm.
                                     -332-

-------
  01
 o

-IN
                                                      a
                                                      o
                                                      •H
                                                      4J
                                                      KJ
                                                      •o
                                                      •H
                                                      01
                                                      a
                                                      0)
                                                     fi
                                                      u
                                                      >.
                                                      ra
                                                      at
                                                      VI ,
                                                      S"
                                                      00
  -383-

-------
                                               0>
                                                           M
                                                           ai
                                                           o
                                                          •rl

                                                          4J
                                                           O

                                                           «t
                                                           HI
                                                           H
                                                           w
                                                           3
                                                           4J
                                                           ID
                                                           M
                                                           n
                                                           o.
                                                           a,
                                                           eo
                                                                                                 u
                                                                                                 •H
                                                                                                 4->
                                                                                                 ra


                                                                                                 I
                                                                                                 u
                                                          VO


                                                           01
                                                           3
                                                           00
 o>
 c
 o>
•3


^
                                                r~  ~Z
                                       _   0)  O
                              CD  Q.   Q_  OL  H-  O

                               till)

                              m  a.   o  cr  J-
                                       D.  a.
-334-

-------
w
UIO
01 Z
Is
o>  S


o  o
O O

«,  «,

=  3
    Q>


   1


    O


"5.  o>
                                                                                  O
                                                                                  o>
                                                                        o
                                                                        o
                                                                 S  S
       o>

ol (£  t-

 i   i  i
   o
OL Q.  H-
    °  ~   S
    |S  -2

    6*0
           o>
          X
                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                  •H
                                                                                                  J-)
                                                                                                   O
                                                                                                   CO
                                                                                                   S-l
                                                                                                  4J
                                                                                                  •H
                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                   tn
                                                                                                   a
                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                  •H
                                                                                                  4J
                                                                                                  •ri
                                                                                                   ta
                                                                                                   ta
                                                                                                   S
                                                                                                   2
                                                                                                   a)
                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                  •H
                                  u
                                  CO
 ^


 00
•H
(4
                                                                              £D  X
                                             -335-

-------
0.6 r
9Q" 1000 fj.q DDT/g  soil

O - Pure SC-C02
• - SC-C02with 5 wt% toluene
* - SC-C02 with 5wt% methanol
                                                                      O

                                                                      O
               10
 20        3O        40
    TIME  (Minutes)
50
60
  Figure 4.      Temporal variation of relative soil concentration in the
                extraction of  a  DDT-contaminated,  spill-site  topsoil,
                showing the effect of entrainers.
                              -386-

-------
  3300
  2000
   500
o>
   40O
or
i-
UJ
o
o

CO
o
a.
   300
   2OO
    IOO
SC-CO   EXTRACTION w 5 wt%  METHANOL

      @ 40°C, 1400 psi AND 0.7  g/sec


      DRY SPILL  SITE TOPSOIL



       90 = 3331 fj.q Aroclor 1260 /g Soil

          = 2052 ^.g Aroclor 1242/g Soil



         A Aroclor  1260 Concentration/g Soil

         • Aroclor  1242 Concentration/g Soil
1 1
•
A
t
                         IO       15       2O

                       EXTRACTION  TIME (min.)
                                  25
30
    Figure 5.     Temporal variation of relative soil concentration in the

               extractxon of a PCB-contaminated,  spill site topsoil.
                             -387-

-------
                 MICROBIAL  DEGRADATION  OF  SYNTHETIC  CHLORINATED COMPOUNDS

                  R.  A.  Haugland,  U.  M. X.  Sangodkar, A. M.  Chakrabarty
                        Department of Microbiology and  Immunology
                            University  of  Illinois at Chicago
                                 Chicago,  Illinois   60612

                                     P. H. Tomasek
                             Pesticide  Degradation Laboratory
                             U.  S. Department  of Agriculture
                               Beltsville, Maryland   20705

                                       P.  R. Sferra
                     Hazardous Waste  Engineering Research  Laboratory
                          U. S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
                                 Cincinnati, Ohio  45268


                                        ABSTRACT

        Pseudomonas cepacia strain AC1100  is a novel organism  from the standpoint  of
being the product of a facilitated evolution process that  has  resulted in  the  formation  of
a unique metabolic pathway for the utilization of the herbicide  2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy-
acetic acid.  A review is presented of  past research pertaining  to this organism as well
as features it possesses that make it a highly desirable  subject  for  further investiga-
tion.  Recent results of an on-going research program designed to isolate  the  genetic
determinants responsible for 2,4,5-T metabolism by this organism are  also  presented.
These include the isolation of a series of spontaneous  mutants affected at several  differ-
ent 2,4,5-T degradation-specific loci,  the construction of a genomic  library of AC1100 DNA
sequences in Escherichia coli and the use  of this library  in the complementation of a pre-
sumed transposon Tn5-induced mutant.
INTRODUCTION

     With growing public awareness of the
health threats posed by synthetic chlorin-
ated compounds in the environment there is
an increasing demand to develop effective
methods for their elimination.  Microbial
degradation is known to contribute to the
destruction of many of these compounds in
the environment.  A major constraint to
this process occurs, however, when approp-
riate dissimilatory pathways have not yet
evolved in natural organisms.   In this
regard, it has been demonstrated that
deliberate genetic selection and genetic
manipulation procedures in the  laboratory
may lead to the  construction of strains
having wider biodegradative capabilities
than their natural counterparts (1-5).
     One of the more notable products  of
this form of deliberately facilitated  evol-
ution is Pseudomonas cepacia strain AC1100
(6).  AC1100 has acquired the ability  to
completely degrade the herbicide 2,4,5-
trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4,5-T)  and
in the process utilize the compound as a
source of carbon and energy for growth.  As
such, it presently provides a rather unique
opportunity to study mechanisms by which
genetic information may be assembled and
evolve towards the formation of novel  bio-
degradative pathways in a single organism.
It has also been shown that AC1100 has the
capability to degrade or dechlorinate a
fairly wide variety of chlorophenol congen-
ers although available evidence suggests
that the majority of these compounds are
not utilized for growth  (7).  Another
                                          -388-

-------
 potential  use of this  organism may,  there-
 fore,  be as  a source  of  genetic information
 in future  attempts  to  assemble complete
 metabolic  pathways  for these  compounds and
 other  priority pollutants.  Finally, treat-
 ment of contaminated  soils  in  the  labora-
 tory with  AC1100 has  been found to result
 in significant reductions of  2,4,5-T (8,9).
 This organism can therefore be considered
 as one of  the better  candidates presently
 available  for use in  evaluating the effects
 (both  in terms of treatment efficacy and
 environmental  impact)  of deliberately
 introducing  a microorganism into the
 environment  for the purpose of soil decon-
 tamination.

     In order to fully realize both these
 and other  potential applications of AC1100,
 it is  clear  that a  good understanding of
 the genetics  and physiology of this organ-
 ism (particularly as they relate to its
 biodegradative capabilities) will  be bene-
 ficial. The  purpose of this report will be
 both to summarize past information that has
 been obtained  in this  regard as  well  as to
 describe ongoing studies that  are  being
 conducted  in  a collaborative research
 effort  by  the  Gulf  Breeze and  Cincinnati
 EPA laboratories  and the University of
 Illinois at Chicago.

 PHYSIOLOGICAL  STUDIES  ON 2,4,5-T AND
 CHLOROPHENOL  DEGRADATION BY AC1100

     Studies  have indicated that 2,4,5-
 trichlorophenol  (2,4,5-TCP) is an early
 intermediate in  the 2,4,5-T breakdown
 pathway of AC1100 and that the enzyme(s)
 responsible for  carrying out this conver-
 sion are constitutive  (10).  The enzymes
 involved in the  further breakdown of  2,4,5-
 TCP are  as yet unknown.  Proposed pathways
 for the  degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-
 acetic  acid through a catechol intermediate
 (11) and pentachlorophenol  through a  hydro-
 quinone  (12) currently provide two alterna-
tive models for potentially describing
 portions of this activity (Figure 1).  It
 also appears that one or more  of the  later
 enzymes  involved in 2,4,5-T degradation by
AC1100  is or are inducible  (10).  In  this
 regard, the available evidence suggests
that 2,4,5-TCP or a subsequent breakdown
 intermediate may be active as  the inducer.

     Considering the nature of the selec-
tive pressure employed in generating  AC1000
 (i.e.,  for growth with 2,4,5-T as a sole
 source   of carbon and energy) it is  not  sur-
 prising to observe that  this  organism  has
 evolved a set  of enzymes that efficiently
 metabolize the related compound  2,4,5-TCP
 and are perhaps synthesized in response to
 this compound.  The ability of AC1100  to
 metabolize various other chlorophenol  con-
 geners, however, may be  impaired  in  several
 ways.   Studies of oxygen uptake and  chlor-
 ide release in the presence of various
 chlorophenol congeners by 2,4,5-T-grown
 resting cells  of AC1100  (Table 1) have
 shown  that each of these compounds is  de-
 chlorinated to some degree and in many
 instances to an extent comparable to that
 of  2,4,5-TCP.   In contrast, the corres-
 ponding oxygen uptake values  observed  for
 these  compounds were in  each  case well be-
 low that observed for 2,4,5-TCP and also
 below  the levels that might have been  pre-
 dicted based on.their individual degrees of
 dechlorination.   In general the more highly
 chlorinated congeners showed  the highest
 ratios of dechlorination  to oxygen uptake.
 These  results  suggest that to  varying  de-
 grees, the dissimilation  of these compounds
 may  be blocked or impaired at  steps in the
 process  that occur  after  at least some
 dechlorination has  taken  place.  Such  a
 phenomenon might  be  expected to occur  if
 specific  intermediates formed  in the ini-
 tial degradation  of  these compounds are
 poorly recognized as substrates by sub-
 sequent  AC1100 degradative enzymes.  Par-
 ticularly  in the  case of the more highly
 chlorinated  phenols, it is also tempting to
 speculate  that dechlorination may at least
 to some  extent be mediated by hydrolytic
 and/or reductive mechanisms similar to
 those  demonstrated by Steiert and Crawford
 (12) for pentachlorophenol (PCP)  degrada-
 tion by  a  Flavobacterium species  (Figure 1).

     Degradation of  PCP by AC1100 has also
 been proposed to be constrained at the
 level  of gene  regulation.  In this regard
 studies have revealed that, unlike 2,4,5-
 TCP, PCP is unable to induce its  own de-
 chlorination in resting cells  of  AC1100
 (10).  At present, the ability of other
 chlorophenol congeners to induce  their own
degradation is  unknown.

     Besides requiring induction,  there is
also some evidence to indicate that  the
2,4,5-T degrading activity of  AC1100 may be
 repressed or inhibited by a number of al-
ternative carbon sources  such  as  glucose,
lactate and succinate (10).  Under certain
conditions this effect can be  shown  to be
at least partially mediated by inhibited
                                         -389-

-------
             9CH2COOH
                ,-CI
                                    COOH
                                      COOH
                                    COOH
                                       :OOH
                                                               CO,  +  Cl-
Figure 1.  Pathways for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)  and  pentachlorophenol  (PCP)
biodegradation.  Part A:  Proposed pathway for the degradation  of 2,4-D by A. eutrophus
OMP134 (after Don et^a]_., 11).  The metabolites involved  are:   2,4-dichloropTfenoxyacetic
acid, 1; 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2; 3,5-dichlorocatechol,  3;  2,4-dichloromuconic acid, 4;
trans-2-chlorodiene-1actone, 5; cis-2-chlorodiene lactone,  6; 2-chloromaleylacetic acid, 7
and 3-oxoadipic acid, 8.  The enzymes involved are:  2,4-D  monooxygenase, a; 2,4-dichloro-
phenol hydroxylase, b; chlorocatechol 1,2-dioxygenase, c; chloromuconate cycloisomerase,
d; 4-carboxymethylenebut-2-en-4-olide (dienelactone)  hydrolase, e and  trans-chlorodiene
lactone isomerase, f.  Part B:  Proposed pathway for  the  degradation of PCP by a Flavo-
bacterium sp. (after Steiert and Crawford, 12).  The  metabolites involved are: penta-
chlorophenol, 1; tetrachloro-£-benzoquinone, 2; tetrachloro-p_-hydroquinone, 3; 2,3,6-tri-
chlorohydroquinone, 4 and 2,6-dichlorohydroquinone, 5.
uptake of an inducer compound (e.g., 2,4,5-
TCP).  Under other conditions this effect
also appears to be exerted at a step or
steps in the pathway following the conver-
sion of 2,4,5-T to 2,4,5-TCP and has been
suggested to create a peculiar problem for
AC1100 cells grown in the presence of
2,4,5-T and one of these alternative carbon
sources.  Culturing AC1100 under these con-
ditions has been found to result in prema-
ture termination of growth, considerable
loss of viability and relatively high
levels of 2,4,5-TCP accumulation in the
medium.  The explanation proposed for these
phenomena is that the inhibitory  effect  of
the alternative substrates leads  to  the
accumulation of 2,4,5-TCP to levels  that
may become toxic to the cells.

     In addition to evolving the  genetic
information required for metabolizing
2,4,5-T, there is evidence that AC1100 has
also evolved the capability to  produce a
2,4,5-T emulsifying agent (13).  This emul-
sifying agent, which the available data  in-
dicate is a high molecular weight lipid
derivative, has been shown to be  specific
for 2,4,5-T and to some extent  other
                                          -390-

-------
    TABLE  1.   CHLOROPHENOL  DEGRADATION BY
              2,4,5-T-GROWN AC1100 RESTING
              CELLS  (FROM KARNS et al .,  7)
Substrate*
Dichloro-
phenols
2,3-
2,4- , ,
2,5- '
2,6-
3,4-
3,5- -
Trichloro-
phenols
2,4,5-
2,3,5-
2,3,6-
2,4,6-
2,3,4-
3,4,5-
Tetrachloro-
phenols
2,3,4,6-
2,3,4,5-
2,3,5,6-
Pentachloro-
phenol
Chloride
Release**


65
71
84
,36
60
- : 38


90
29
29
56
70
27


80
60
94

92
Oxygen
Uptake***


16.0
16.5
35.9
10.1
27.0
8.1


100.0
17.8
2.6
ND
ND
ND


16.1
ND
ND

9.3
*Each substrate was used at a concentration
 of 0.1 mM.  Incubation period was 3 hr.
**Percentage of the theoretical maximum.
***Expressed as a percentage of the net  ,
   respiration rate observed for 2,4,5-TCP.
ND:  Not determined.
related chlorophenols and is not produced
by other P. cepacia strains.  While a
definite role for this compound .has not as
yet been established, the production of
such agents is known to be important in
facilitating the uptake and utilization of
hydrophobic compounds by microorganisms.

MOLECULAR AND GENETIC STUDIES OF AC1100

     Studies of various organisms showing
the capability to degrade different syn-
thetic compounds have revealed that the
genetic information for these activities is
often located,on plasmids.  Populations of
AC1100 cells have been analyzed for plasmid
content and have revealed some heterogene-
ity in this regard (14).  It was observed
that the predominant fraction of the cells
(80% or more) contained a single .plasmid of
 approximately 170 kb.   A smaller  fraction
 (about  10%)  contained  a plasmid of  approxi-
 mately  40 kb.  Other plasmids  ranging  in
 size  from 2  kb to 30 kb were also observed.
 Direct  evidence for the involvement of
 plasmids  in  the 2,4,5-T degrading activity
 of  AC1100 has not as yet been  forthcoming.
 Efforts to cure this strain of plasmids as
 a means of making this  determination using
 conventional  mitomycin  C treatment  have not
 succeeded (14).  The strongest indirect
 evidence  for such involvement  has resulted
 from  the  demonstration  that hybridization
 occurs between  a specific region  of AC1100
 plasmid DNA  and a portion of the  plasmid
 pJP4  (15).   The hybridizing region  of  pJP4
 harbors structural genes  coding for both 3-
 chlorobenzoic acid (3CBA) and  2,4-dictiloro-
 phenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) degradative
 enzymes (11).   It was also rep.orted that
 AC1100 plasmid  DNA did  not hybridize to the
 chlorocatechol  (clc) gene cluster of
 another plasmid TpAC27)  under  stringent
 conditions (15).  These  clc genes (coding
 for enzymes  c,d;e; Figure 1A)  are both
 isofunctional  and homologous to the corres-
 ponding genes  of pJP4.   This observation
 has. lead  to  the conclusion that the
 sequence  homology between AC1100  plasmid
 DNA and pJP4 may  be limited to genes in-
 volved in the degradation of chlorophenoxy
 acetates  (e.g.,  enzyme a, Figure  1A).

      Further  preliminary  evidence concern-
 ing the location  of determinants for
 2,4,5-T metabolism in AC1100 has  resulted
 from  the  generation of  random transppson
 Tn5 mutants  of  this organism (15).  Plasmid
 and total  DNAs  isolated from a number  of
 Tn5-containing  AC1100,derivatives that had
 also  lost their 2,4,5-T degradative ability
 were  hybridized with a labeled Tn5  DNA.
 probe and in each case only the total DNA  ;
 was found to show homology.  A rigorous
 demonstration that the Tn5 insertions in
 these mutants are directly responsible for
 their loss of 2,4,5-T degrading activity
 has not yet been made.   Efforts to make
 such  a determination with one of these
 mutants,  PT88, were pursued by the con-
 struction of a  gene library of its total
 genomic DNA and the .isolation of clones
 containing the  kanamycin  resistance deter-
 minant of Tn5 (15).  Subsequent use of a
 flanking AC1100 DNA fragment from one side
 of one of these clones  as a hybridization.
 probe to filter blots  of total  AC1100 DNA
 has revealed that a sequence is present
within this DNA fragment that is  repeated.
 numerous times  in the  AC1100 genome.  These
                                           -391-

-------
results have lead to the interesting specu-
lation that repeated sequences may be
associated with determinants for 2,4,5-T
degradation in AC1100 and hence may have
had a role in the evolution of this capa-
bility.  In this regard, recent studies
with P. cepacia strain 249 have not only
identified a number of repeated insertion
sequences within this organism but have
also suggested a potential role for these
sequences in creating genomic plasticity
by processes such as insertional activation
of genes as well as the recruitment of
foreign plasmid-born genes by replicon
fusion (16-18).

     Efforts to isolate and identify the
2,4,5-T degradative genes of AC1100 are
presently being continued in our labora-
tories.  Toward this end a new  genomic
library of AC1100 DNA sequences has re-
cently been constructed.  To do this, total
DNA from AC1100 was isolated and partially
digested with  restriction endonuclease Bam
HI under conditions that maximized the for-
mation of DNA  fragments in the  size range
of 20 to 30 kb.  DNA of the 23  kb broad
host range cosraid vector  pCPIS  (19) was
also digested  with Bam HI  (in this case to
completion), dephosphorylated with calf in-
testine alkaline phosphatase  and then
ligated with the AC1100 DNA fragments.  The
ligation products were packaged into lambda
phage heads in vitro and  transfected into
E. coli strain" AC80.  A  library containing
approximately  10,000 tetracycline  resistant
clones was  generated in this  manner.

     The  library was subsequently  mobilized
en masse  using a modification of  a previ-
ously  described triparental conjugative
mating  system (20)  into  a series  of 2,4,5-T
defective,  transposon Tn5 insertion mutants
 of AC1100 (15, see  above).  Of 12 such mut-
 ants  screened in  this manner, only one
 (PT88)  was  initially observed to  produce
tetracycline-resistant  transconjugants that
 appeared to be phenotypically complemented
 based on their ability  to grow on media
 containing 2,4,5-T as  a sole  carbon source.
 Plasmid DNA from a 2,4,5-T metabolizing
 transconjugant was isolated and transformed
 back into _E_. coli.  This plasmid, desig-
 nated pUSl, was confirmed to  complement the
 PT88 mutation by producing nearly 100%
 2,4,5-T metabolizing transconjugants when
 remobilized into PT88 from E. coli.  The
 recombinant plasmid pUSl has  also subse-
 quently been demonstrated to complement two
 additional mutants (PT8 and PT9) in a
similar manner.  Further studies  are cur-
rently in progress to characterize the in-
sert DNA of this plasmid with respect to
the location, number and organization of
2,4,5-T degradative genes that it contains.

INSTABILITY OF 2,4,5-T DEGRADATIVE
CAPABILITY IN AC1100

     It has been documented that  AC1100
cells can spontaneously lose 2,4,5-T
degradative capability when grown in the
absence of this compound (6).  These ex-
periments indicated that the frequency of
such events may vary with culture age but
could approach a rate of approximately 6 X
10"* per cell per generation or higher.  As
previously mentioned, AC1100 has  been shown
to be effective in decontaminating 2,4,5-T
treated soils in a laboratory setting.  An
additional observation in these studies was
that cells with 2,4,5-T degradative capa-
bility rapidly disappeared from the soil
samples once the 2,4,5-T levels were dimin-
ished.  While not proven, it is reasonable
to suggest that the  instability of the
2,4,5-T degradative  genes in AC1100 may
have contributed significantly to this
disappearance.

     The underlying  cause behind the insta-
bility of ACllOO's  2,4,5-T degradative
phenotype has  not been  established  although
several  potential mechanisms can be  en-
visaged.  One  obvious possibility  is that
2,4,5-T  determinants are located on  a
plasmid  that is  readily  lost through  segre-
gation.  Other possibilities include  legit-
imate  or illegitimate recombination  events
mediated by  the  presence  of  repeated
 sequences  or transposable  elements.   As
previously mentioned, numerous sequences
of this  type have recently  been  identified -
in P.  cepacia strain 249 and it  is poten-
tially significant  to  note that  this organ-
 ism also appears to undergo spontaneous
mutations  at a high frequency.

      The mechanism(s)  underlying the spon-
 taneous loss of 2,4,5-T degradative ability
 by AC1100 are currently under further in-
 vestigation in our laboratories.  A number
 of spontaneous mutants  have been identified
 by replica plating AC1100 colonies grown on
 a nonselective medium (containing basal
 salts and 0.1% yeast extract, 6) onto
 medium containing 2,4,5-T as sole carbon
 source.  It has been observed that these
 mutants can be phenotypically differenti-
 ated on the basis of their growth charac-
                                           -392-

-------
               TABLE 2.  GROWTH CHARACTERISTICS OF SPONTANEOUS ACUOO MUTANTS
     Mutant Class
2,4.5-T
  Growth Substrate

Glucose
                                                                  2,4,5-T + Glucose
                         no growth
                comparable to
                wild-type
                                                               comparable to wild-type
                                                               but  produces a  dark  red
                                                               pi gment
B no growth
C no growth
D no growth

comparable to
wild -type
comparable to
wild-type
comparable to
wild -type but
colonies are
more mucoid
very little or no growth
comparable to wild-type
comparable to wild-type
but colonies are more
mucoid

teristics  in  basal  salts medium containing
2,4,5-T  plus  glucose.  These differences
which are  summarized in Table 2 suggest
that multiple genetic loci may be inde-
pendently  susceptible to spontaneous muta-
tional events in AC1100. ,In view of this
observation it appears unlikely that tne
loss of  a  plasmid can be the sole explan-
ation for  loss of 2,4,5-T degrative capa-
bility in  this organism.

     Studies  are currently in progress to.
both identify the steps in the 2,4,5-T
degradative pathway at which these mutants
are blocked and to isolate the affected
genes by means of complementation with our
AC1100 genomic library.  As the cloned DNA
sequences  corresponding to these mutated
regions are isolated, it should be possi-
ble to use them as hybridization probes in
determining the physical  basis for the
mutational  events.

ACKNOWEDGEMENTS

     This investigation was supported by a
cooperative program grant from the U. S.
EPA (CR809666) and in part  by a Public
Health Service grant (ES04050)  from  the
National  Institute of Environmental  Health
Sciences.

REFERENCES

1.   Reinke,  W.  and  H.-J.  Knackmuss.   1979.
     Construction of haloaromatics utiliz-
                           ing bacteria.
                           385-386.
                      Nature  (London) 277:
                     5.
                     6.
       Chatterjee, D. K. and A. M.
       Chakrabarty.  1982.  Genetic rear-
       rangements in.plasmids specifying
       total degradation of chlorinated
       benzoic acids.  Mot. Gen. Genet.
       188:279-285.

       Sjchweinj U. and E. Schmidt.  1982.
       Improved degradation of monochloro-
       phenols by a constructed strain.
       Appl, Environ.  Microbiol. 44:33-39.

       Reinke, W., S. W. Wessels, M. A.
       Rubio, J. Latorre, U. Schwein,  E.
       Schmidt, M.  Schlomann and H.-J.
       Knackmuss.  1982.  Degradation  of
       monochlorinated  aromatics following
       transfer of genes encoding chloro-
       catechol catabolism.  FEMS Microbiol.
       Lett. 14:291-294.

       Lehrbach, P.  R.,  J.  Zeyer, W. Reinke,
      ,H.-J. Knackmuss  and  K.  N. Timmis.
       1984.  Enzyme .recruitment in  vitro:
       Use of cloned genes  to  extend the
       range of haloaromatics  degraded by
       Pseudomonas sp.  strain  813.   J.
       Bacteriol.  158:  1025-1032.

       Kilbane, J. J., D. K. Chatterjee,
       J.  S. Karns,  S. T. Kellogg  and  A.  M.
       Chakrabarty.   1982.   Biodegradation  of
       2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic  acid  by a
                                          -393-

-------
9.
10.
11.
 12.
 13.
pure culture of Pseudomonas cepacia.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44:72-78.

Karns, J. S., J. J. Kilbane, S.
Duttagupta and A. M. Chakrabarty.
1983.  Metabolism of halophenols by
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid-
degrading Pseudomonas^ cep_acijK  Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 46:1176-1181.

Chatterjee, D. K., J. J. Kilbane and
A. M. Chakrabarty.  1982.  Biodegrada-
tion of  2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic
acid in  soil  by a pure culture of
Pseudomonas cepacia.  Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 44:514-516.

Kilbane, 0. J., D.  K. Chatterjee and
A.  M. Chakrabarty.  1983.  Detoxifica-
tion of  2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic
acid from contaminated soil by
Pseudomonas cepacia.  Appl. Environ.
Microbiol.  45:1697-1700.

Karns,  J. S., S.  Duttagupta and  A. M.
Chakrabarty.   1983.  Regulation  of
2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic  acid and
chlorophenol  metabolism in Pseudomonas
cepacia AC1100.  Appl.  Environ.
Microbiol.  46:1182-1186.

 Don, R. H., A. J. Weightman,  H.-J.
 Knackmuss and K. N. Timmis.  1985.
 Transposon  mutagenesis  and cloning
 analysis of the pathway for degrada-
 tion of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
 and 3-chlorobenzoate in Alcaligenes
 eutrophus JMP134(pJP4). J. Bacteriol.
 161:85-90.

 Steiert, J.  G. and R. L. Crawford.
 1986.   Catabolism of pentachloro-
 phenol  by a  Flavobacterium sp.
 Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 141:
 825-830.

 Banerjee,  S.,  S. Duttagupta and A. M.
 Chakrabarty.  1983.  Production of
 emulsifying  agent  during  growth of
 Pseudomonas  cepacia with  2,4,5-
                                                   trichlorophenoxyacetic acid.
                                                   Microbiol. 135:110-114.
                                                                            Arch.
14.  Ghosal,  D.,  I.-S.  You,  D.  K.
     Chatterjee and  A.  M.  Chakrabarty.
     1985.  Plasmids in the  degradation
     of chlorinated  compounds.   Plasmids
     in Bacteria, D. Helinski,  S.  N.  Cohen,
     UT Clewell,  D.  Jackson  and A.
     Hollaender (eds.)  Plenum Press,  New
     York, pp 667-686.

15.  Tomasek, P. H.  and A. M. Chakrabarty.
     1985.  Bacterial degradation  of  chlor-
     inated compounds.   Proceedings of the
     llth Annual Hazardous Waste Research
     Symposium.  U.  S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio
     pp 127-134.

16.  Gaffney, T. D. and T. G. Lessie.
     1987.   Insertion  sequence-dependent
     rearrangements of Pseudomonas cepaci a
     plasmid pTGLl.  J. Bacteriol. 169-
     224-230.

17.  Barsomian,  G.  and T. G. Lessie.  1986.
     Replicon  fusions  promoted  by  insertion
     sequences on Pseudomonas  cepaci a
     plasmid pTGL6.  Mol. Gen.  Genet. 204:
     273-280.

 18.  Scordilis,  G.  E., H. Ree  and  T. G.
     Lessie.  1987.  Identification  of
     transposible elements  which  activate
      gene expression in Pseudomonas
      cepacia.   J. Bacteriol. 169:8-13.

 19.   Darzins,  A. and A. M.  Chakrabarty.
      1984.  Cloning of genes controlling
      alginate  biosynthesis  from a mucoid
      cystic fibrosis isolate of Pseudomonas
      aeruginosa;  J. Bacteriol. 159:9-18.

 20.  Ditta, G., S.  Stanfield, D.  Corbin  and
      D. R. Helinski.  1980.  Broad host
      range DNA cloning system for gram
      negative bacteria:  Construction of a
      gene bank of Rhi  zobi urn meliloti.
      Proc.  Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA.   77:7347-
      7351.
                                             -394-

-------
                      BACTERIAL OXIDATION OF POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS

           Louise M. Nadim, Mark J. Schocken, Frank K. Higson and David T. Gibson
                               Center  for Applied Microbiology
                              The  University of  Texas  at  Austin
                                    Austin, Texas 78712
                                             and
                   Donna  L.  Bedard,  Lawrence H.  Bopp and  Frank J.  Monde!lo
                                  General Electric Company
                             Corporate Research and Development
                                Schenectady, New York 12301


                                          ABSTRACT

     The present studies  represent a summary of the results obtained on the degradation of
 polychlor.nated biphenyls by two strains of bacteria.  The organisms, Alcaligenes eutro-
 P"us H850 and Pseudomonas put?da LB400,  are capable of metabolizing a wide range oFPCf
 congeners.  The initial  reactions involved in  the oxidation of  2,5,2',5'-tetrach1oro-
 biphenyl  by both organisms appears to involve  oxidation  at the  unsubstituted 3,4-posi-
 tions.   The properties of the enzymes involved  in these  reactions and the regulation of
 their activities are being studied by modern molecular biological  techniques.   It is
 anticipated that the results obtained will  lead to the construction of improved strains
 of bacteria that can efficiently  degrade a wide range of PCB congeners.
 INTRODUCTION

     Polychlorinated  biphenyls  (PCBs)  are
manufactured  by  the  controlled chlorine
substitution  of  the  biphenyl molecule.
Mixtures of PCB  isomers  and congeners of a
differing degree of  chlorine substitution
were first marketed  in the USA under  the
name "Aroclor" by the Monsanto Corporation
almost 50 years  ago.

    PCBs are  extremely stable  compounds,
their excellent  heat resistance and dielec-
tric properties  have led to wide  industri-
al use in capacitors, transformers,
dielectric fluids, fire  retardants and
plasticizers  (10,12).

    The stability of PCBs also makes them
quite resistant  to biodegradation.  This
is particularly  true for congeners contain-
ing 5 or more chlorine substituents (7,12)
which tend to accumulate in the environ-
ment.  The lipophilic nature of PCBs
 causes  them to partition  into the  fatty
 tissue  of higher  organisms,  thus concen-
 trating them in the  food  chain by  several
 orders  of magnitude  at each  succeeding
 trophic level.  This is of concern to
 human health since the long  term effects
 of  PCBs are not fully understood.

    Two microorganisms, A lealigenes eu-
 trophus  strain H850 and  Pseudomonas~puti-
 da  strain LB400 were used in  this  study!"
 Both organisms  were  isolated  from  PCB con-
 taminated soil  and tested for  their abili-
 ty  to degrade a wide range of  PCBs  (1,2,A)
 including  congeners  that have  no unsubsti-
 tuted 2,3-positions  (the favored sites of
 initial oxidative attack), such as
 2,5.2",5'-tetrachlorobiphenyl  (2,5,2',5'-
 CB).  Congener  depletion assays indicate
 that chlorine substitution at the 2,5-pos-
 itions may facilitate degradation of cer-
tain PCBs  (2,3).  The pathway used for the
degradation of  a 2,5-dichlorinated aroma-
tic ring has not been established.
                                          -395-

-------
However,  It seems possible  that  alterna-
tive pathways to that  shown in Figure 1
for blphenyl may exist.  The general  fea-
tures of  the pathway have often  been  extra-
polated to account  for the  biodegradation
Of certain PCB  congeners (7,12).   For exam-
ple, it is generally assumed that the ini-
tial oxidative  reaction occurs by the in-
corporation of  both atoms of molecular oxy-
gen  Into  the aromatic  nucleus that con-
tains the least number of chlorine sub-
stltuents.  The resulting dihydrodiol is
then oxidized by a  pyridine nucleotide-
dependent dehydrogenase to form the appro-
priate ring-fission substrate.  Subsequent
steps involving hydrolysis, hydration and
aldol cleavage are thought to account for
the formation of small molecules that can
enter the tricarboxylic acid cycle.   It  is
difficult to see how  2,5,2',5'-CB  and simi-
lar PCBs can be degraded by this pathway.
The results presented, show for the first
time that bacteria can initiate oxidation
of the biphenyl molecule at the 3,4-posi-
tions.
                                                                          COOH
                                                                                  Acid
           4.                        2,3-Dlhydroxybiphenyl                Benzole acid

       Blphenyl     els.-Blphenyl dihydrodiol                 Ring fission product
                           (J) Biphenyl dioxygenase
                           (5) els-Biphenyl  dihydrodiol  dehydrogenase

                           (f) 2,3-Dlhydroxyblphenyl  dioxygenase

                           © Hydrolyase


 Figure 1.   Initial reactions  in the oxidation of  biphenyl by A_.  eutrophus H850 and £.
             put!da LBAOO
 MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Microorganisms and growth conditions

     Alcaligenes eutrophus strain  H850  and
 Pseudomonas put Ida strain LBkOO were
 isolated as described  previously  (1,4).
 Transformation studies were  usually con-
 ducted with biphenyl-Snduced cells.  Metab-
 olites were isolated by  high pressure  li-
 quid chromatography (HPLC) and  identified
 from the information provided by  conven-
 tional chemical techniques.   These includ-
 ed proton magnetic  resonance spectrometry
 (PMR), mass spectrometry (MS) and gas
 chromatography (GC).   In certain  instances
 crude mixtures of metabolites were sepa-
 rated and  identified by  GC/MS.

 Mutant  Isolation
     Mutagenesis with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-
 nitrosoguanidine was carried out as des-
 cribed previously (5).  Transposon mutagen-
 esis was carried out using either E_. col i
 NEC0100 (pRKTVH) as described by Finette
 (6) or £. coli C600 (pBEE-132) as des-
 cribed by Kuner et al (11).  Presumptive
 biphenyl  strains were selected on the
 basis of their failure to produce large
 colonies when grown on mineral salts agar
 containing 0.2% succinate and 40 microgram
 (y g/ml) of triphenyltetrazolium chloride.
 Biphenyl crystals were placed  in the lid
 of each petri dish.

     Rapid screening techniques were util-
 ized to  identify mutants defective  in
 structural genes of the biphenyl catabolic
 pathway.  Biphenyl dioxygenase activity
                                             -396-

-------
 was  detected  by the ability  of  strains  to
 clear  zones of bipheny]  from the surface
 of agar  plates that had  been sprayed  with
 an ether solution  of biphenyl.

     Mutants defective in cis-2,3-dihydroxy-
 2,3-dihydrobiphenyl  dehydrogenase and
 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl  dioxygenase were
 detected by their  ability to clear zones
 of biphenyl from the surface of  agar
 plates as described  above.   Dehydrogenase
 mutants  were  distinguished from  dioxygen-
 ase  mutants by their  ability to  form  a
 yellow ring fission  product  when  colonies
 on agar  plates were  sprayed  with  an ether
 solution of 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl.  No
 color change  was observed when 2,3-dihy-
 droxyb iphenyl  dioxygenase mutants  were
 exposed  to 2,3-dihyroxybiphenyl.   Mutants
defective in  the ring fission enzyme,
2-hydroxy-6-oxo-pheny1hexa-2,4-d i eno i c
acid hydrolase, were detected by the
accumulation of the yellow ring fission
product when colonies were exposed to
biphenyl, c|s-2,3-dihydroxy-2,3-dihydro-
fa iphenyl  and 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl.
              RESULTS

              Whole cell  studies

                  Both A lealigenes eutrophus H850 and P.
              P"tida LB400 were able to utilize biphen^l
              as the sole source of carbon and energy
              for growth.   In  order to establish the
              initial reactions involved in biphenyl
              degradation mutant strains were isolated
              that  contained defects in the structural
              genes for the first four enzymes of the
              pathway shown in Figure 1.  The properties
              of these mutant  strains are shown in Table
              1.   Strains  FM200 and FM202 do not produce
              clear zones  on agar plates that have been
              sprayed with an  ether solution of biphen-
              yl.   However, crossfeeding experiments
              with  Beijerinckia B8/36,  a mutant that
              accumulates  cis-biphenyl  dihydrodiol  (8),
              results in growth of  both  FM200 and
              FM202.   These strains  may  have defects in
              the structural gene(s)  for biphenyl  dioxy-
              genase  or they may  be  unable  to transport
              biphenyl.  Strains  FM203,  204,  and  408
              each  oxidize bipheny]  to cis-biphenyl
             TABLE  1.  PRODUCTS  FORMED  FROM  BIPHENYL  BY MUTANT  STRAINS
                                OF P. PUTIDA LB400
      Strain Designation
Source
                                                   Products formed from Biphenyl
FM200
FM202
FM203
FM204
FM408
FM903
FM905
FM205
FM206
Tn5 Kmr2
Tn5 Kmr
Tn5 Kmr
Tn5,Kmr
NTG-5
Tn5-132 tet™
Tn5-132 tetr
Tn5 Km
Tn5 Kmr
None
None
cis-B iphenyl dihydrodiol
cis-B iphenyl dihydrodiol
cis-Biphenyl dihydrodiol
2, 3-D ihydroxyb iphenyl (2,3-DB)
2, 3-D ihydroxyb iphenyl (2,3-DB)
2,3-DB Ring fission product
2,3-DB Ring fission product
         Strains were  isolated as described  in Materials and Methods.

         Kanamycin resistant.

         N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine.

         Tetracycline resistant.
                                          -397-

-------
dthydrodiol which has an absorbtlon maxi-
mum at 303 nm (8).  Biphenyl and cis-bi-
phenyl dihydrodiol are both oxidized by
strains FM903 and 905 to a compound that
shows an absorption maximum at 2^7 nm.   In
addition, cell free supernatant solutions
containing this metabolite are rapidly
oxidized to a yellow ring fission product
by blphenyl-induced cells of the parent
strain of P. put?da LB400.  These observa-
tions strongly  indicate that strains FM903
and 905 contain a defective gene for
2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl dioxygenase and that
the product formed from biphenyl and cis-
biphenyl dihydrodiol  is 2,3-dihydroxybi-
phenyl.  When biphenyl, cJ£-biphenyl dihy-
drodiol and 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl are  in-
cubated with  strains FM205  and 206  a
bright yellow ring fission  product  which
has an absorbance maximum at k3k nm accu-
mulates from  each substrate.  These re-
sults show that  neither  strain  contains
an  active  enzyme  for  the  metabolism of  the
ring-fission  product  formed from 2,3-dihy-
droxybiphenyl.  The  results are  consistent
with  the  pathway  shown  in Figure 1.  Polar-
ographic  studies .indicate that  A.  eutro-
phus  H850  also  utilizes this pathway (data
not shown).
chlorophenyl ring improves degradabi1ity,
even for  congeners that contain 1-3 chlor-
ine substituents on the other ring (Table
2D).
 Oxidation of PCB congeners by biphenyl-
 Induced cells of A. eutrophus HS50 and P.
 put Ida LB500~~
     Previous studies have shown that
 congener depletion assays can provide
 valuable information on the ability of
 different bacterial strains to oxidize
 individual PCBs (1,2,3,4).  The results of
 these Investigations are summarized  in
 Table 2.  Quantitative analysis of the
 data is difficult due to the fact that
 percentage depletion was only measured at
 one time point (2kh) and that the data
 represents a summation of several differ-
 ent experiments.  Nevertheless, the  re-
 sults clearly  indicate that chlorine  sub-
 stitution at the Jf,4'-positions renders a
 molecule  less  susceptible to degradation
 by these  strains and that P. putida  LB400
 Is more effective  than .A. eutrophus  H850
 In oxidizing congeners  with this substi-
 tution pattern (Table 2B).  The effect of
 chlorine  substitution at  the 2,6-positions
 Is shown  in Table  2C.  This substitution
 pattern seems  particularly  effective in
 preventing  significant PCB  degradation by
 both organisms.   In contrast,  a 2,5~di-
Oxidation of 2,5.2'.S'-tetrachlorobiphenyl
(2.5,2'.5'-CBT'

    Alcaligenes eutrophus H850 and Pseudo-
monas putida LB400 were unable to utilize
2,5,2',5'-tetrachlorobiphenyl as a source
of carbon and energy for growth.  However,
biphenyl-grown cells of both organisms
rapidly transformed this tetrachlorobi-
phenyl to polar products.

    The first product formed from
2,5,2',5'-CB was  isolated and  identified
by conventional chemical techniques  as
3,k-dihydroxy-3,4-d ihydro-2,5,2',5'-tetr'a-
ch1orob i pheny1  (3,4-di hydrod i ol).  S ubse-
quent metabolism  of this dihydrodiol led
to the  accumulation of  a more  polar  prod-
uct which appeared to be resistant to fur-
ther  degradation.   This metabolite was iso-
lated  and  identified  as 3,4,3'.^'-tetrahy-
droxy-3,4,31 ,V-tetrahydro-2,5,2' ,5'-tetra-
chlorobiphenyl  (b_i_s-3,A-di hydrod i ol).
There were  no indications  of  prior dechlor-
 ination reactions which would  leave  2,3-
positions  aval Table for oxidation.   How-
ever,  the  identification  by GC/MS  of 2,51-
dichloroacetophenone as a  minor metabolite
confirms the studies of Bedard et  al (3),
 and  may indicate  the presence of a novel
 pathway for the degradation of biphenyIs
 that contain certain chlorine substitution
 patterns.

     The second reaction in the bacterial
 degradation of biphenyl is catalyzed by a
 pyridine nucleotide-dependent dehydrogen-
 ase which oxidizes cis-2,3-dihydroxy-2,3-
 dihydrobipheny1 to 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl.
 This enzyme was very active in cell   ex-
 tracts prepared from bipheny1-grown cells
 of A. eutrophus H850 and P_. putida  LB400
 (dala not shown).  The same cell extracts
 were not active against the 3,4-dihydro-
 diol or the bis-3,4-dihydrodio1.

 DISCUSSION

     £. eutrophus  H850  and  IP.  putida LBAOO
 can Use biphenyl  as a  sole source of
 carbon and  energy for  growth.   Preliminary
  studies with the  mutants  listed  in  Table 1
  indicate that £*'  putida LB400  oxidizes
                                            -398-

-------
       TABLE 2.   DEGRADATION OF  PCB  CONGENERS  BY £.  EUTROPHUS  H850

                           AND jP.  PUT I DA  LB4001

PCB
Congener
2,3-
2,5-
2,6-
2,2'-
2,4'-
4,4'-
2,4,4'-
2,5,2'-
2,5,4'-
2,4,2 ',4 '-
2, 4,3', 4'-
2,4.6,4'-
2, 5,2', 3'-
2, 5,3', 4'-
2,4, 6.2', 4'-
2,3, 4.2', 5'-

PCB
Congener
2,6-
2,4.6-
2,4,6,4'-
.2, 6,2', 6'-
2, 4, 6,2', V-
2, 4, 6,3', 4'-
2, 4, 6,3'. 5'-
2,3,6,2',3',6'-
2, 4, 6,2', 4', 6'-

A
Percent
H850
100 -
100
30
100
100
40
75
100
100
55
20
0
100 ,
90
0
60
C
Percent
RSso
30
20
0
0
0
0
0
20
0


degraded
LB400
100
100
40
100
100
50
100
100
100
100
65
0
100
100
0
100

degraded
LB400
40
25
0
0
0
0
0
35
0


PCB
Congener
4,4'-
2.4,4'-
2. 4,2'. 4'-
2. 4,3', 4'-
2,4,6,4'-
3, 4,3', 4'-
2, 4, 6,2', 4'-
2,4,5,2',4',5'-









PCB
Congener
2,5-
2,5,2'-
2,5.4'-
2.5.2'. 3'-
2,5, 3', 4'-
2,5,2',6'-
2, 5,2', 5'-
2, 5,2', 4', 6'-
2, 5.2', 4', 5'-
2, 5,2', 3'. 4'-
B
Percent
H850
40
75
55
20
0
0
0
15








D
Percent
H850
95
100
100
100
90
90
100
40
70
60

degraded
LB400
50
100
100
65
o
0
0
70









degraded
LB400
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
75
100
100
Data obtained from defined congener assays as described  in (2) and reported
in part in references 3 and 4.  Each mixture contained 10-11 chlorinated
biphenyls in which each congener was present at a concentration of 5.0 y M.
                                     -399-

-------
blphenyl at the 2,3-position to form cis-
2,3-dIhydroxy-2,3~dIhydrobIpheny1.  S ub-
sequent oxidation of this metabolite fol-
lows the reaction sequence shown in Figure
1.  A mutant strain of A. eutrophus H850
(Strain FM803) also oxidizes biphenyl to
cis-2,3-dihydroxy-2,3-dihydrobiphenyl and
poTarographic studies with bipheny1-grown
cells of the parent organism (data not
shown)  indicates that the pathway shown  in
Figure  1 also represents the major reac-
tion sequence for the oxidation of bi-
phenyl  by £. eutrophus H850.

     The results  in Table 2 show that both
A. eutrophus H850 and _P. putida LB400 have
"the ability to oxidize a wide  range of PCB
congeners.  Strain LB400 appears to be
more effective than strain H850  in terms
                                          H
                                  of the extent of oxidation of  individual
                                  PCBs.  However, this aspect has not been
                                  investigated  in detail.   In general terms,
                                  the results shown  in Table 2  indicate that
                                  a 2,5-chlorine substitution pattern en-
                                  hances degradation and this feature has
                                  been reported  in some detail by Bedard et
                                  al (3).   In contrast a 4,4'- or 2,6-chlor-
                                  ine substitution pattern  inhibits oxida-
                                  tion even  if  the molecule has  free 2,3-pos-
                                  itions available for oxygenation.

                                       Since both organisms oxidized
                                  2,5,2',5'-tetrachlorobiphenyl  (2,5,2',5'-
                                  CB) this  substrate was chosen  for further
                                  study.  The  results obtained  are shown  In
                                  Figure 2.  The major  reactions involve
                                  sequential dihydroxylation  at  both of the
                                  open 3,4-positions in  2,5,2',5'~CB.
                                                          H   OH
 Figure 2.
                                                                                 Cl
Major reactions involved in the transformation of 2,5,2',5'-CB by biphenyl-
grown cells of £. eutrophus H850 and £. putida LB400.  The formation of the
minor metabolite, 2,5-dichloroacetophenone is not shown.
 The relative stereochemistry of the hydrox-
 yl groups  In both products has not been
 firmly established.  The cis orienta-
 tlon(s) shown  in Figure 2  is based on the
 results of previous studies which have
 shown that bacteria initiate the oxidation
 of biphenyl and several other aromatic
 hydrocarbons by enzymatically incorpor-
 ating both atoms of oxygen  into the aro-
 matic nucleus  to form dihydrodiols^in
 which the  hydroxyl groups  have a cis-rel-
 ative stereochemistry (9).

     There  are  several possible explana-
 tions for  the  results obtained  in this
                                   study.  At the enzyme level, different
                                   chlorine substitution patterns cause
                                   steric effects and these could permit or
                                   retard access of different PCBs to the
                                   active site of the dioxygenase induced by
                                   biphenyl.  Thus the oxidation of 2,5,2',5'
                                   -CB at the 3,4-positions may be catalyzed
                                   by the 2,3-dihydroxybiphenyl dioxygenase
                                   that  is  induced by growth  in the presence
                                   of biphenyl.  Alternatively, a different
                                   biphenyl oxygenase may  be  responsible for
                                   the observed  results.   Different chlorine
                                   substitution  patterns may  be responsible
                                   for effects at the transcriptional  level.
                                   For example,  a 2,5-substitution pattern
                                            -400-

-------
could induce an enzyme with different pro-
perties and substrate specificity to the
enzyme induced by biphenyl.  The difficul-
ties associated with the  interpretation of
the results 'are due to the low levels of
substrates used and the length of time
required to demonstrate significant degra-
dation of  individual PCB congeners.  Stud-
ies currently being conducted are directed
towards the elucidation of these problems.
As described in the present study mutants
have been  isolated that are defective in
the structural genes for the first four
enzymes of the biphenyl degradative path-
way.  The use of these organisms in bio-
transformation experiments should provide
valuable information on the pathways util-
ized for the oxidation of different PCB
congeners.

    Our future studies will be directed
towards cloning the genes for biphenyl di-
oxygenase  into high expression vectors.
The availability of such strains will fa-
cilitate the isolation and characteriza-
tion of the initial dioxygenase and permit
unambiguous determination of the substrate
specificity of the enzyme for individual
PCB isomers and homologs.  In addition,
such studies will provide valuable informa-
tion on the regulation of the enzyme(s) in-
volved in PCB metabolism.  We anticipate
that this approach will lead to the con-
struction of bacterial strains that can ef-
ficiently biodegrade complex mixtures of
PCBs.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    This work was supported in part by
Grant CR812/27 from the Office of Research
and Development, the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency.  We thank Dr. P.R. Sferra,
EPA Project Officer for his interest, sup-
port and suggestions.  Initial studies on
the oxidation of 2,5,2',5'-tetrach1orobi-
phenyl by A^ eutrophus H850 at the Univei—
sity of Texas were supported by grant
A02-A00579000 from General Electric Com-
pany.  We thank Catherine Potter for her
patience and skill in organizing and typ-
ing the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1.   Bedard, Donna L., Michael J. Brennan,
     and Ronald Unterman, 1984.  Bacterial
     degradation of PCBs:  Evidence of
    distinct pathways in Corynebacterium
    sp. MB1 and A lealigenes eutrophus
    HSJO.  In Proceedings of" the 1983 PCB
    seminar. Electric Power Research
    Institute (G. Addis and R. Komai.
    eds).Palo Alto, CA., pp4-101 to
    4-118.

2.   Bedard, Donna L., Ronald Unterman,
    Lawrence H. Bopp, Michael J. Brennan,
    Marie L. Haberl, and Carl Johnson,
    1986.  Rapid assay for screening and
    characterizing microorganisms for the
    ability to degrade polychlorinated
    biphenyls.  Appl. Environ. Microbio.
    51, PP761-76S:

3.   Bedard, Donna L., Marie C. Haberl,
    Ralph J. May, and Michael J. Brennan,
    1987.  Evidence for novel mechanisms
    of PCB metabolism in A lealigenes eu-
    trophus H850, Appl.  Environ. MicroT,
    in press.

4.   Bopp, Lawrence H.,  1986.  Degradation
    of highly chlorinated PCBs by Pseudo-
    monas strain LB400.  J. Ind. Microbio-
    logy 1, pp23-29.

5.   Finette, Barry A.,  Venkiteswaran
    Subramanian, and David T.  Gibson,
    1984.  Isolation and characterization
    of Pseudomonas put?da PpF1 mutants
    defective in the,toluene dioxygenase
    enzyme system.  J_. Bacter iol. 160,
    pp1003-1009.

6.   Finette, Barry A.,  1984.  Molecular
    characterization of the toluene (tod)
    operon from Pseudotnonas put!da PpFI,
    Ph.D. dissertation.  The University of
    Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

7.   Furukawa, Kensuke,  1982.   Microbial
    degradation of polychlorinated
    biphenyls (PCBs), In Biodegradation
    and Detoxification of Environmental
    Pollutants (A.M. Chakrabarty, ed.).
    CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida,
    PP33-57.

8.   Gibson, David T., Rowena L. Roberts,
    Martha C. Wells, and Val M. Kobal,
    1973.  Oxidation of  biphenyl by a
    Beijerinckia sp., Biochem. Biophys.
    Res. Commun. 50, pp211-219.
                                          -401-

-------
9.   Gibson, David T., and Venklteswaran
     Subramanian, 1984.  Microbial
     degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons.
     In Microbial Degradation of Organic
     Compounds (D.T. Gibson, ed.), Marcel
     Dekker, Inc., New York, ppl8l-252.

10.  Hutzinger, Otto, Stephen H. Safe, and
     Vladimir Zitko, 1974.  Commercial PCB
     preparations, properties and composi-
     tion. In The_CjTem]^try_of_PCBs_, C.R.C.
     Press, Cleveland, p8.

11.  Kuner, Jerry M., Leon Avery, Douglas
     E. Berg, and Dale Kaiser, 1981.  Uses
     of transposon Tng in the genetic
     analysis of Myxococcus xanthus.  In
     Microbiology (D. Schlessinger, ed).
     ASM Publications, Washington D.C.,
     pp128-132.

12.  Safe, Stephen H., 1984.  Microbial
     degradation of polychlorinated
     biphenyls.In Microbial Degradation of
     Organic Compounds (David T. Gibson,
     ed).Marcel Dekker,  Inc., New York,
     PP361-370.
                                           -402-

-------
                             ENGINEERING P450 GENES IN YEAST

               C. Chena, C.R. Deya, V.F. Kalfaa, D. Sanglarda, T.R. Sutterb, T. Turia
                                       and J.C. Lopera,b
                       aDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics
                             bDepartment °f Environmental Health
                          University of Cincinnati College of Medicine
                                   Cincinnati, OH 45267-0524
                                          ABSTRACT


      Cytochrome P450 systems catalyze the monooxygenation of a broad range of xenobiotic
compounds. These systems are most extensively characterized in mammals, where for a given
species a single form of NADPH-cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase (P450R) donates reducing power
to any of 30-to-100 unique members of a P450 protein superfamily. We are interested in gene
engineering P450 systems in yeast for the oxidative detoxication and biodegradation of
environmentally stable organic pollutants. Two organisms, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast)
and Candida tropicalis ATCC750, a yeast capable of n-alkane assimilation, have been used as
models.  S. cerevisiae is particularly useful for gene manipulation; C. tropicaZis is of interest for its
possible advantages for genetically engineering the uptake and catabolism of hydrophobic toxicants.
The major proteins of interest in these model yeasts are: P450R; the P450 lanosterol 14a-
demethylase, involved in sterol biosynthesis; and P450 n-alkane oi-hydroxylase.

      Genes for these proteins have been isolated and determination of their DNA sequence has been
completed or is in progress.  Ammo acid sequences deduced from these DNAs were compared to
sequences reported for mammalian P450 system proteins. Our results indicate that the P450R
protein is highly conserved among yeast and  mammals. The yeast P450 proteins share patterns
observed for mammalian P450s, with sequence similarity among enzymes of similar function and
with wide sequence diversity between P450s  of different substrate specificity.  The yeast P450s for
lanosterol demethylation and alkane n-hydroxylation belong to two new families in the P450
superfamily. Characterization of these genes forms a basis for the gene engineering of P450
expression in yeasts.
INTRODUCTION

     Viewed broadly in terms of the natural
cycles in the biosphere it is clear that nearly all
compounds are degraded. These biological
degradations are primarily effected by bacteria,
yeasts, molds and other microorganisms.
Included in the biodegradable category are a
variety of halogenated aromatic compounds.
Thus when environmental persistence of various
polychlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons is
encountered, it is reasonable .to consider the
isolation or modification of such organisms in
order to catalyze the entry of these persistent
compounds into the pre-existing degradative
pathways. Numerous national workshops and
symposia have proposed the development of
microbial biodegradation technologies for their
potential as low cost, environmentally sound
tools in the treatment of high priority pollutant
targets in land fills, waste sites, and industrial
effluents. (13,9).

     Because of the highly substituted structure
of the persistent polychlorinated aromatics, the
P450 monooxygenases are likely candidates as
catalysts for their specific oxidation or
reductive dechlorination. Fungi and yeasts are
eukaryotie microorganisms which are known to
catalyze a broad range of these reactions using
                                            -403-

-------
P450 enzymes (10) and mammalian P450s have
been implicated in the degradation of such
compounds as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin (8,4), 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (7),
and hexachlorobenzene (12).  We are interested
In gene engineering yeasts to provide organisms
combining both the P450-catalyzed degradation
of persistent toxic compounds and the capacity
to survive or to survive and grow in
contaminated environments.

PURPOSE AND APPROACH

     Fig. 1 shows a diagram of a cytoplasmic
membrane-bound  P450 monooxygenase system.
In mammals as many as 30-to-100 different
P450s make up the P450 protein superfamily (5).
Each P450 receives electrons for its reaction
from a single NADPH-P450 oxidoreductase
(P450R), or in some  cases from P450R plus a
second donor,  cytochrome b5. The individual
P450 enzymes provide the specificity for a
broad range of oxidative reactions, shown here
as the hydroxylation of the substrate with the
concomitant formation of a water molecule.

     Until recently the  molecular genetics of
eukaryotic P450s  was based entirely upon
studies of mammalian systems.  Although major
P450 enzymes had been described for yeasts (2),
none of the relevant genes or the signals
controlling expression of those genes were
characterized. Since an understanding of these
genetic elements  would provide a basis for
engineering P450s in yeasts,  the goal of this
phase of our work has been the isolation and
molecular characterization of genes coding for
yeast P450 systems. Two organisms were used:
baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; and
Candida tropicalis ATCC750. S. cerevisiae is
highly characterized genetically and has become
the eukaryotic microorganism of choice for the
application of molecular genetic techniques. C.
tropicalis ATCC750 is representative of a group
of yeasts capable of growth upon n-alkanes in
petroleum as a carbon and energy source; such
yeasts already express lipophilic properties
which may be useful in gene engineering cells
for the uptake and  metabolism of hydrophobic
hazardous compounds.

      The major proteins of interest in both of
these yeasts are  P450R and the P450 enzyme
lanosterol 14o-demethylase (14DM), an enzyme
well studied for its role in the biosynthesis of
ergosterol. Additionally C. tropicalis employs
the P450 enzyme u-hydroxylase (P450alk) as
catalyst of the initial step in n-alkane
catabolism.  In the recently recommended
nomenclature for the P450 gene superfamily,
14DM and P450alk are designated as LIA1 and
LIB1 respectively (6).

RESULTS

      Progress in our isolation and DNA
sequence characterization of these genes has
been described (3,1,11, and  manuscripts
submitted for publication) and is summarized in
Table I.  Access  to the DNA sequence of a gene
makes possible the description of the deduced
amino acid sequence of the encoded protein.
Thus this summary Table I also indicates that we
have full or partial data for the deduced amino
              NADPH.H +
                  NADP-
           Fig. 1. A schematic of the membrane bound P450 monooxygenase system.
                                            -404-

-------
Table 1.  PROGRESS IN THE CHARACTERIZATION OF YEAST P450 GENES
Organism
       Genes
Isolated        Sequenced
                   References
S. cerevisiae

P45014DM
LIA1*
P450R

C. tropicalis

P450alk
LIB1*


P45014DM

P450R
   X
   X

   X
in progress



  X



in progress

in progress
                                    Kalb et al., 1986
                                    Kalb et al., manuscript submitted
                                    Kalb and Loper, manuscript submitted

                                    Sutter et al., unpublished
Sanglard et al. 1987
Sanglard et al., manuscript in
preparation

Chen et al., unpublished

Sutter et al., unpublished
*Nomenclature of Nebert et al., see ref. 6.
acid sequence of each of these proteins.  We
have now begun to ask how these lower
eukaryotic P450R and P450 proteins compare to
the P450 system proteins in the P450
superfamily.  Results of such comparisons are
presented  here.

     Our first test was to compare the deduced
ammo acid sequence of one mammalian P450
with all available protein sequences. Bovine
adrenal cortex P450C21 was arbitrarily chosen
for the mammalian P450 sequence. The pool of
protein sequences contained all of the several
thousand sequences in the National Biomedical
Research Foundation (NBRF) Protein Sequence
Data Bank Release 10.0, our data for two yeast
P450 proteins, and sequence data for three
mammalian P450s not yet included in the NBRF
compilation.  The yeast P450 sequences were for
S. cerevisiae  14DM and C. tropicalis P450alk.
The algorithm used was that of Wilbur  and
Lipman (14) implemented at Bionet (The
parameters used were: WORD-LENGTH,  1;
GAP-PENALTY, 2; WINDOW, 30; DENSITY,
Less; and FAST,  No).
                                These comparisons appear as relatedness
                           scores in Fig. 2.  The majority of proteins of
                           course   show only random sequence
                           relatedness; for the total population the mean
                           score was 4.6 +/- 0.9 s.d.  The horizontal bar
                           covers the location of all 22 of the eukaryotic
                           P450s in this distribution  and  illustrates the
                           wide diversity of protein sequence structure
                           among the P450 superfamily.  Five entries are
                           plotted with values of >60; one of these is for
                           the P450C21 protein itself. The relatedness
                           scores for the remaining 17 P450s in this
                           population range from 60  down to 19,  a score
                           four times that of random relatedness. The
                           relatedness scores of S. cerevisiae 14DM and C.
                           tropicalis P450alk, indicated as S. c.  and C. t.
                           in Fig. 2, are 20 and 29 respectively.  Although
                           relatively low, these scores are similar to the
                           score seen with bovine P450scc (score = 19).
                           Thus these two P450s from the lower  eukaryotes
                           lie within the diversity range  of the mammalian
                           P450s.

                           Homology and diversity among yeast P450s. A
                           relatedness score as discussed above gives an
                           overall average for two protein sequences.
                           Homology matrix comparisons between pairs of
                                            -405-

-------
 H
 U
 H
 B
 E
 R

 0
 F

 S
 E
 Q
 O
 E
 H
 C
 E
 S
     1400-
     1000-
500-
100-
 50-
 10-
5™*
«.
- *
i
0

* S.C.
* **
1 1
10 20

C.t.
** * **
1
30
*

*
** ** * ** *
1 1 1
40 50 60 >60
                                     SCORE
Fig. 2. Relatedness scores of P450C21 with the sequences in the National Biomedical
Research Foundation protein database.
                                      -406-

-------
P450s allow the examination of the localization
of similarities and differences across the length
of the amino acid sequences. Such comparisons
were obtained using the Pustell dot matrix
program (International Biotechnologies, Inc.; the
parameters used were: RANGE, 6; SCALE, 0.9;
HASH LEVEL, 1; JUMP LEVEL, 1; STEP, 1;
MINIMUM VALUE, 40; COMPRESSION, 5.)
Regions of homology between paired sequences
are indicated by the presence of a letter which
encodes a score proportional to the degree of
homology:  A = 100%, B = 98-99%, Z = 50-51%, a
= 48-49%, b = 46-47% etc. Thus in this program
a self-comparison for any amino acid sequence
would generate a diagonal plot  consisting of a
continuous string of A's.

     Our data of deduced amino acid sequence
for the 14DM genes from both S. cerevisiae and
C. tropicaZis were used to examine the
relatedness of this P450 in the  two yeast genera.
Since the present DNA sequence
characterization of the C. tropicalis 14DM gene
contains a few ambiguous bases, the homology
matrix comparison which resulted is only a close
approximation.  However it is clear from the
pattern obtained that these two proteins have
extensive homology throughout their deduced
amino acid sequences, see Fig.  3A.

     This homology for the 14DM proteins is in
marked contrast to the minimal relatedness seen
between the two C. tropicalis P450s, 14DM and
P450alk, see Fig. 3B.  Again the homology
matrix comparison of these two proteins is only
a close approximation, pending resolution of a
few ambiguous nucleotide, residues in our
present DNA sequence for the C. tropicalis
14DM gene. This lack of pattern structure
reveals a remarkable sequence  diversity for
these two P450s from the same yeast.

2.   P450R proteins

     Determination of the DNA sequence.for
the P450R gene from C. tropicalis is nearly
complete and sequencing of the S. cerevisiae
P450R gene is in progress. Preliminary data
indicate that these P450R proteins are quite
similar in protein sequence and also show high
homology to mammalian P450R proteins.

DISCUSSION

     Isolation and DNA sequence determination
of the P450 genes for 14DM of S. cerevisiae and
for P450alk of C. tropicalis has allowed the first
comparisons of deduced protein sequences for
P450s of lower and higher eukaryotes.  We have
shown that each of these P450s is a member of a
distinct P450 family (Kalb et al. manuscript
submitted for publication 1987, Sanglard et al.,
unpublished). Together with the preliminary
homology comparisons presented here involving
the C. tropicalis 14DM sequence, the data
strongly support the conclusion that  P450
structure in yeasts resembles mammalian P450
structure.  The two yeast 14DM P450s show
extensive homology, and in results not presented
here we have demonstrated that the 14DM gene
of C. tropicalis is functionally expressed in S.
cerevisiae and can compensate for 14DM-
def icient mutants in that yeast (C. Chen et al.,
unpublished). On the other hand, comparisons  of
P450alk with deduced sequences of 14DM of
either yeast show great diversity, an observation
which is consistent with the diversity between
these P450s regarding substrate and  reaction
specificity. That the structure for P450R
protein is highly conserved across yeasts and
mammals is of particular interest, since
molecular genetic tools for a detailed structure
function analysis can be applied to the yeast
enzyme as  a model of all eukaryotic P450R,
including human.

     Access to this DNA sequence data makes
possible the molecular genetic manipulation of
these genes.  For example, based upon DNA
sequence information T. Turi has inactivated the
14DM gene in S. cerevisiae by gene disruption,
an experiment which showed that this gene is
essential for normal growth (Kalb et al.,
manuscript submitted for publication, 1987).
The availability of such genetically inactivated
strains provides an ideal background for tests in
which restoration of activity can be  examined
under genetically altered levels of expression.
Also, the normal P450 gene can be mutated in
vitro and the altered construct put into the
tester strain and its level of function
determined.  Access to the DNA sequence of
the C. tropicaZis gene for P450alk will facilitate
our testing of its expression as a foreign gene  in
S. cerevisiae. Experiments using these  methods
form important steps toward gene engineering
other specific P450s in yeasts for the
degradation of hazardous wastes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     This work was supported in part by
Cooperative Agreements CR810605  and^
CR813366 to JCL from the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Research' and
Development, Hazardous Waste Engineering
                                           -407-

-------
                         S.  cerevisiae  14DM AMINP ACID RESIDUE NUMBER
                     100
200
                                               300
400
500
      100
H
Q
H
      200
n    30°
•H
H

§
•H
O    400














e
a


\
"Y
Yv

















»H. 	
\
e








d







d
\
a














zb


Q
\
"x













i




Yx
SK


d














Ij
ED£
Ilvz


d






e







d
\.
"u
c

















T
°X
	 ?












	 t"





y.
FH
Hjs



















\
a
              Fig. 3A. Homology matrix comparisons of P45014DM from two yeasts.
                                         -408-

-------
                      t. tropicalis  14DM AMINO ACID RESIDUE  NUMBER
      100
 H
 CO
      200
 nJ
 o
 in
to
•H
rH
(0
O
      300
£     400
O
      500
                      100
200
                                                300
                                                             400
                                                         d e
      Fig. 3B.  Homology matrix comparisons of two P450s from C. tropicalts ATCC750.
                                      -409-

-------
 Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, P.R. Sferra,
 Project Officer.  DS was supported in part by a
  research fellowship from the Swiss National
   Foundation. DS and VFK are postdoctoral
    fellows and CC, TRS and TGT are Ph.D.
 graduate students supported by their respective
        Departments in the University.

References

1.    Kalb, V.F., Loper, J.C., Dey, C.R., Woods,
     C.W. and Sutter, T.R. 1986. Isolation of a
     cytochrome P450 structural gene from
     Saccharomyces cerevisiae.  Gene 45,237-
     245.

2.    KSppeli, O.  1986.  Cytochrome P450 of
     yeasts.  Microbiological Reviews 50,244-
     258.
3.
4.
5.
6.
     Loper, J.C., Chen, C. and Dey, C.R. 1985.
     Gene engineering in yeast for
     biodegradation:  Immunological cross-
    ' reactivity among cytochrome P450 system
     proteins of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae
     and Candida tropicalis. Hazard. Wastes
     and Hazard. Mat. 2,131-141.

     Neal, R., Gasiewicz, T., Geiger, L., Olson,
     J., and Sawahata, T. Metabolism of
     2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in
     mammalian systems, in Biological
     Mechanisms of Dioxin Action, Bambury
     Report 18, A.  Poland and R. Dikinbrough,
     eds.,  Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1985.

     Nebeft, D.W. and Gonzalez, F.J. 1985.
     Cytochrome P450 gene expression and
     regulation. TIPS 6,160-164.
      Nebert, D.W., Adesnik,
      T?ofoHi*r»(-*lr "D IA7  Cinnw.
      Sato, R., & Waterman, M.R.  1987.
      P450 gene family, recomemmended
      nomenclature.  DNA 6,1-11.
      Poiger, H., Buser, H.R. and Schlatter, C.H.
      1984.  The metabolism of 2,3,7,8-
      tetrachlorodibenzofuran in the rat.
      Chemosphere 13.351-357.

      Poiger, H. and Buser, H. The metabolism
      of TCDD in the dog and rat, in Biological
      Mechanisms of Dioxin Action, Bambury
      Report 18, A. Poland and R. Dikinbrough,
      eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1985.
9.    Proceedings of USEPA Workshop on
     Biotechnology and Pollution Control,
     March, 1986.

10.  Rosazza, J.P. and Smith, R.V.  1979.
     Microbial models of drug metabolism,
     Advances in Applied Microbiology 25,169-
     208.

11.  Sanglard, D., Chen,  C. and Loper,  J.C.
     1987. Isolation of the alkane inducible
     cytoehrome P450 (P450alk) gene from the
     yeast Candida tropicalis.  Biochem.
     Biophys. Res. Comm. in press.

12.  Takazawa, R.S. and Strobel, H.W.  1986.
     Cytochrome P450 mediated reductive   .
     dehalogenation of the perhalogenated
     aromatic compound hexachlorobenzene.
     Biochemistry 25,4804-4809.

13.  USEPA, Report of the Research Planning
   .» Workshop on Bioavailability of Dioxins,
     EPA/600/9-86/004 Washington, DC. 56 pp.
    ' 1986.

14.  Wilbur, W.J. and Lipman, D.J.  1983.
     Rapid similarity searcher of nucleic acid
     protein data banks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
     USA 80,726-730.
                                            -410-

-------
                          BIODEGRADATION OF ORGANOPOLLUTANTS BY
                  PHANEROCHAETE CHRYSOSPORIUM! PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS

            John A. Bumpus, Tudor Fernando, Gerald J. Mileski, Steven D. Aust
                               Department of Biochemistry
                               Michigan State University
                                East Lansing, MI  48824


                                        ABSTRACT

     We previously reported that a wide variety of structurally diverse organopollutants
are mineralized by the lignin degrading system of the white rot fungus Phanerochaete
chrysosporium (Science 228, 1434, 1985).  Current research is directed towards applica-
tion of this technology for the biodegradation of environmental pollutants and hazardous
wastes.  The system is effective in both liquid and solid matrices.  Bulking agents such
as wood chips or corn cobs can also serve as a carbon source for the fungus.  Degradation
of chemicals is supported by a carbon source for the fungus but readily available carbon
sources such as glucose do not support sustained rates of degradation.  Sustained rates
were obtained with complex carbohydrates including natural sources.  Rates of degradation
increased with respect to the concentration of chemical.  Degradation of mixtures often
preceded faster than the rate of degradation of pure chemicals.  For example, the mineral-
ization of pure 2,4,5,2',4',5'-hexachlorobiphenyl preceded much slower (1.1? in 30 days)
than did the mineralization of Aroclor 1254 and 1242 (14.3? and 20.3?, respectively, in
30 days).  Two percent of pure 1^C-naphthalene was mineralized in 30 days but 32? was
mineralized when the ]^C-naphthalene was present in coal tar contaminated soil.  Toxicity
of chemicals to the fungus was rare but could be circumvented.  The fungus would grow in
the presence of used motor oil or coal tar contaminated soil.' The toxicity of the fungi-
cide pentachlorophenol (PCP) was reduced by starting with mature mycelia instead of
fungal spores.  Under these conditions, the fungus continued to mineralize substantial
amounts of PCP at concentrations up to 100 ppm.  For example, when the initial concentra-
tion of PCP was 100 ppm, greater than 20? of the PCP initially present was mineralized in
30 days.  Furthermore, disappearance studies showed that approximately 95? of the PCP
initially present had been metabolized.                                       '
INTRODUCTION

     The wood rotting fungus Phanerochaete
chrysosporium is a member of the Basidiomy-
cotina.  Recent studies in our laboratory
(2-9) and by others (1,11,12, 20) have
shown that under nutrient nitrogen limit-
ing conditions, this microorganism is able
to degrade a wide variety of structurally
diverse and environmentally persistent
organopollutants to carbon dioxide.  The
ability to degrade such a wide variety of
chemicals has been found to be due, at
least in part, to the lignin degrading
system of this funugs (1-9,11,12,20).
Lignin is a complex heteropolymer and is
possibly the most difficult-to-degrade,
naturally occurring organic compound (10).
When nutrient nitrogen is depleted in '
cultures of P_. chrysosporium, this fungus
secretes a family of peroxldases that are
able to catalyze the oxidative
depolymerization of lignin as well as a
number of other reactions which occur
during the biodegradation of lignin
(21,22).  The peroxidases, which are
commonly referred to as ligninases, are
also able to catalyze the initial
oxidation of many hard-to-degrade.
organopollutants (5,12,13,20).  This is of
                                          -411-

-------
great significance because the initial
oxidation of a chemical is often the most
difficult step in its biodegradation.

     Because of its broad biodegradative
abilities, we have proposed that it may be
possible to develop waste treatment
systems based on the use of this microorga-
nism in axenic culture or in conjunction
with other microorganisms (2).  Also, the
use of ligninases as additives may prove
to be a viable option in some waste treat-
ment processes.

     Although the use of P_. chrysosporium
in the treatment of organochemical wastes
holds great potential, in practice there
are a number of factors which must be
addressed before this microorganism or its
extracellular ligninases can be used in
such systems.  The present study addresses
some of these concerns.

METHODS AND MATERIALS
     Phanerochaete chrysosporium
(BKM-F-1767) was obtained from the United
States Department of Agriculture, Forest
Products Laboratory (Madison, WI).  This
fungus was maintained on malt agar slant
cultures and was stored at room tempera-
ture until used.  Subcultures were made
routinely every'30-60 days.

Radiochemicals

     Carbon-14 labeled Aroclor 1242 (33
mCi/mmol), Aroclor 1254 (32 mCi/mmol) and
DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chloro-
phenyl)ethane)  (75 mCi/mmol) were obtained
from the Amersham Co. (Arlington Heights,
IL) while carbon-14 labeled POP (penta-
chlorophenol) (10.57 mCi/mmol), DDE (1,1-
dichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethene),
2,4,5,2',4',5'-HCB (2,4,5,2',4',5'-hexa-
chlorobiphenyl  (13.09 mCi/mmol) and
glucose (1.88 mCi/mmol) were obtained from
Pathfinder Laboratories Inc. (St. Louis,
MO).  Carbon-14 labeled dicofol (2,2,2,-
trichloro-1,1-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethanol)
(9.78 mCi/mmol) was a gift from the Rohm
and Haas Co. (Springhouse, PA).  The
purity of radiolabeled chemicals was
monitored via thin layer chromatography
(TLC) or by high performance liquid
chromatography  (HPLC) using solvent
systems recommended by the vendors.  When
necessary, these compounds were repurified
by TLC.  The purity of radiolabeled com-
pounds used in these experiments was 98%
or greater.  For the special case of the
polychlorinated biphenyl mixtures (Aroclor
1254 and Aroclor 1242), the radiolabeled
mixtures were compared with authentic
unlabeled Aroclor 1242 and Aroclor 1254 by
gas liquid chromatography.  These studies
showed that, although some differences
were apparent, the radiolabeled Aroclors
appeared to be very similar to their
unlabeled counterparts.

Culture Conditions and Mineralization
Studies

     For most experiments, P_. chrysospori-
um was incubated at 37°-39°C'in 10 ml of
nutrient nitrogen deficient culture medium
as described by Kirk et al. (16).  This
medium consists of 56 mM glucose; 1.2 mM
ammonium tartrate, trace elements and
thiamine (1 mg/L) in 20 mM dimethylsucci-
nate buffer, pH 4.2.  Cultures were estab-
lished by inoculating this medium with
spores as described (16).  In most experi-
ments, 1^C-labeled chemicals, in a minimal
volume of acetone, were added at this time.
During the first three days of incubation,
cultures were grown under ambient atmos-
phere in 250 ml Wheaton Bottles equipped
with a gas exchange manifold.  After three
days and at three day intervals thereaf-
ter, cultures were flushed with oxygen.
The atmosphere from each culture was
forced through 10 ml of an ethanolamine
containing scintillation cocktail which
served as a carbon dioxide trap.
Carbon-14 labeled carbon dioxide was quan-
titated'by liquid scintillation spectrome-
try.  Details of this mineralization assay
have been previously described (2,16).

High Performance Liquid Chromatography

     The amount of PCP remaining following
its incubation in ligninolytic cultures of
£. chrysosporium was determined using a
Beckman HPLC system equipped with an
Alltech R-Sil C-18 reverse phase column
(4.6 x 250 mm). 'Isocratic elution was
performed using acetonitrilezHgOtglacial
acetic acid (75:25:0.125) at a flow rate
of 2 ml/min.  Elution'of PCP was monitored
at 238 run.  Quantitation of PCP was accom'-
plished using a Hewlett-Packard model
3390A integrator.
                                          -412-

-------
     In a typical experiment, a culture
that had been incubated with 1 or 100 ppm
of PCP was poured into a 30 ml tissue
grinder.  The culture bottle was then
rinsed with 5 ml of ethanol and then with
5 ml of water.  Both the ethanol and water
rinses were added to the tissue grinder.
The fungal mats were then homogenized with
five strokes using a motor driven teflon
pestle and the final volume was measured.  '
One ml of NaCl saturated water was mixed
with each aliquot prior to extraction with
hexane.   When the initial concentration
of PCP in culture was 1 ppm, 4-5 ml of
homogenate was extracted with 1 ml of
hexane by mixing on a vortex for 30 s.
The aqueous and organic phases were then
separated by centrifugation.  Typically,
50-100 ul allquots of hexane were used for
PCP determinations.  Cultures in which the
initial concentration of PCP was 100 ppm
were extracted in a similar manner except
that 0.5 ml of homogenate was extracted
with 2 ml of hexane.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Biodegradative Abilities of P.
chrysosporlum

     The development of waste treatment
systems based on the use of £. chrysospori-
um is an attractive concept for many
reasons.  For example, a wide-variety of
structurally diverse organopollutants,
including some of the most recalcitrant
environmental pollutants known, are
degraded to carbon dioxide (i.e., mineral-
ized) by this fungus (1-9,11,12,20).  The
fact that these compounds are degraded to
carbon dioxide is an important concept
because it demonstrates that a metabolic
pathway exists for the complete biodegrada-
tion of each of these compounds.  It also
implies that intermediates formed during
biodegradation of the parent compound are
also metabolized.  It is critical that
this occur because metabolites of some
organopollutants may be as toxic, or even
more toxic than the parent compound.  They
may also be as difficult to degrade.
Table 1 shows that dicofol (2,2,2-trichloro
1,1-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethanol) a metabo-
lite formed by £. chrysosporium during DDT
degradation is itself readily mineralized.
Table 1 also demonstrates that DDE is
mineralized by this fungus.  Although DDE
is not a substantial DDT metabolite in
this system, it is a major bacterial (17)
and mammalian (19) metabolite of DDT.  It
may also be formed from DDT in the environ-
ment and it is at least as toxic and as
environmentally persistent as DDT (15,17,
18).  Also sites contaminated with DDT
would be expected to be contaminated with
DDE, especially when these sites have been
contaminated with technical preparations
of DDT which contain substantial amounts
of DDE initially.

     The observation that metabolites of
organopollutants are themselves metabo-
lized in consistent with the report by
Sanglard et al. (20) in which it was shown
that water soluble metabolites of benzo(a)-
pyrene were formed following the formation
of organic soluble metabolites in nutrient
nitrogen deficient cultures of this fungus.
The organic soluble benzo(a)pyrene metabo-
lites were subsequently identified as the
benzo(a)pyrene 1,6-, 3,6- and 3,12-quin-
ones (12).  It is interesting to note
that, unlike the reaction products of the
cytochrome P-450 monooxygenases of mammali-
an systems, the highly carcinogenic 7,8
-diol- 9,10-epoxide of benzo(a)pyrene was
not reported to be a benzo(a)pyrene metabo-
lite in this fungus.  Hammel et al. (13)
have also presented data which indicate
that the mutagenic intermediates of pyrene
(pyrene-1,6-dione and pyrene-1,8-dione)
are also further metabolized by P_.
ohrysosporlum.  It is also important to
note that mutagenic or otherwise toxic
metabolites formed by the ligninases of j?.
chrysosporlum would be formed extracellu-'
larly thus limiting their interaction with
intracellular components such as DMA.

Enhancement of Biodegradation by P.
chrysosporium

     The initial report (2) from our labo-
ratory  was designed to show that a number
of environmentally persistent organo-
halides, as well as the polycyclic aromat-
ic hydrocarbon, benzo(a)pyrene, could be
degraded by £. chrysosporium in nutrient
nitrogen deficient cultures.  Although
mineralization did occur, the rate of
mineralization in some cases was relative-
ly slow.  For example, only 9.3? of the
1^C-benzo(a)pyrene initially present was
mineralized during 30 days of incubation.
Because of the desirability of developing
systems which rapidly degrade organopollu-
tants, we have initiated studies which
focus on ways to increase the rate of bio-
degradation of organopollutants using this
microorganism.  However, it should be
                                           -413-

-------
            TABLE 1.   MINERALIZATION OF DDE AND DICOFOL BY P_. CHRYSOSPORIUMa
                         Initial
                      Concentration
                    (nmoles/culture)
    Amount
  Mineralized13
(pinoles/culture)
Mineralized13
DDE
Dicofol
15.0
5:0
714 ± 180
800 ± 232
it. 8 ± 1.2
16.0 ±4.6
 a.  Each culture was grown in 10 ml of the nutrient nitrogen limiting media described by
     Kirk et al. (17).

 b.  These values represent the amount or percent of 1l*C-labeled substrate that was
     converted to 1l|C02 in 30 days (mean +_ standard deviation, N = 4).
noted that if waste treatment systems can
be developed which produce sustained
levels of biodegradation at the low rates
already demonstrated, even these systems
would be sufficient to ensure the timely
destruction of these chemicals.

     Efforts to increase the rate of bio-
degradation of organopollutants by P_.
ohrysosporium have employed a number of
strategies.  For example, we have shown
that increasing the concentration of
growth substrate (glucose) from 26 mM to
112 mM resulted in a 2.5 fold increase in
the amount of 1l*C-DDT mineralized during a
30 day incubation period (3).  An interest-
ing facet of these studies is the fact
that the initial rate of mineralization
(i.e. the rate observed between day 3 and
day 18) was the same for all of the glu-
cose concentrations studied.  The differ-
ence in the amount of 114C-DDT mineralized
was due to the fact that, in cultures con-
taining low (28 mM and 56 mM) glucose con-
centrations, the rate of mineralization
rapidly declined after 18 days of incuba-
tion whereas this decline was not as pro-
nounced in cultures containing higher con-
centrations of glucose.  These results
suggest that the ability to mineralize
organopollutants is dependent upon  the
availability of a carbon source such as
glucose which can serve as a growth sub-
strate.  This hypothesis was confirmed  in
studies in which supplemental glucose was
shown to increase the rate and extent of
I^C-DDT mineralization when added to cul-
tures in which the glucose concentration
had been depleted  (2,3).
      The ability of supplemental glucose
 to increase the rate and extent of bio-
 degradation may be due to at least two
 phenomena.  First, the addition of supple-
 mental glucose may simply increase the
 overall rate of fungal metabolism and, as
 a consequence, organopollutants or their
 metabolites are mineralized at a faster
 rate.  Secondly, since hydrogen peroxide
 is a required cosubstrate for the lignin-
 ases which are responsible for the initial
 oxidation of many organopollutants, it is
 possible that the addition of supplemental
 glucose allows the fungus to produce the
 required hydrogen peroxide as a co-product
 of the glucose oxidase system.

      The suitability of using more complex
 carbohydrates to support growth and miner-
 alization of organopollutants has also
 been studied.  Figure 1 demonstrates that
 1? cellulose and 1$ starch are both sub-
 stantially better than 1$ glucose in
 supporting mineralization of 1^C-DDT.
 Possibly the most important aspect of this
 experiment is the fact that, although the
 initial rate of mineralization with all
 three substrates was nearly identical, the
 rate of mineralization when starch or
 cellulose served as growth substrate did
 not decline as rapidly as when glucose was
 used.  Furthermore, in the cultures con-
 taining cellulose or starch, substantial
 amounts of 1l*C-DDT continued to be miner-
 alized for the duration of the 90 day
 incubation period.

      In addition  to cellulose and starch,
 a number of inexpensive and readily avail-
 able cellulosic materials were tested for
 their ability to  support growth and
                                           -414-

-------
   g
   8 80
      0   12   24   36   4«  60 '  72   84
                    TINE (DAYS)


Figure 1.  Mineralization of ^C-DDT  by J?.
ohrysosporium using  1% starch  (closed  ~
squares), cellulose  (closed circles)  or
glucose  (closed triangles) as  growth
substrate.  The initial concentration of.
14C-DDT was 365 pmoles/culture.
        mineralization.  Figure 2 shows
that 5% (w/v) wheat straw, used newspaper
and corn cobs all support growth of the
fungus and mineralization of 1l)C-DDT.
Although these materials were less effi-
cient that starch or cellulose in the
support of 1^C-DDT mineralization, they
did support substantial amounts of miner-
alization (13.2? ± 5.8, 8.1? ± 5.0, and
8.2? ± 3.3, respectively).  This, coupled
with the fact these materials are inexpen-
sive and readily available suggests that
they may be suitable for use as growth
substrates in a practical waste treatment
system.

Biodegradation of Complex Mixtures

     The lignin (and organopollutant)
degrading system of P_. chrysosporium is
relatively non-specific and non-stereo-
selective.  This property is very impor-
tant because, unlike other microorganisms,
one would expect that this fungus might be
able to degrade complex mixtures of xeno-
biotics.  Indeed, Table 2 demonstrates
that 1^C-Aroclor 125*1 (a mixture of
tetra-, penta- and hexa-chlorobiphenyls)
and 1^C-Aroclor 1242 (a mixture of mono-,
di-, tri- and tetra-chlorobiphenyls) under-
go substantial mineralization in nutrient
nitrogen deficient cultures of P. chryso-
                                                     1«
     f 30
     B
     §
                   12    II
                     TME (MYS)
Figure 2.  Mineralization of ,1l*C-DDT  by  P_.
chrysosporium grown on 5% wheat  straw  .~-
(closed circles), newspaper  (closed
squares) or corn cobs (closed  triangles).
The initial concentration of 11(C-DDT  was
365 pmoles/culture.
sporlum.  These studies are  in good agree-
ment with the work of Eaton  (11) who  first
showed that 1l*C-Aroclor 1254 was degraded
by £. chrysosporium.  ,It is  interesting-to
note that mineralization of  the Aroclor ... .
mixtures proceeded more rapidly than  minerr
alization of pure 1^C-2,4,5,2',4',5'-hexa-
chlorobiphenyl.  The reason  for this  is,
at present, unknown.  It may be that  this
highly chlorinated biphenyl  congener  is
simply more resistent to degradation  than
other congeners in these PCB mixtures.: On
the other hand, It is interesting to  specu-
late that certain individual components of
complex mixtures may exert synergistic. .
effects on the oxidative biodegradation of.
other components in the mixture.  There is
precedent for such interactions.  For  exam-
ple, addition of veratryl alcohol,has,been
shown to increase the rate and extent,of.
degradation of benzo(a)pyrene (12)  and
4-methoxymandelic acid (4).  We have  .
observed a similar phenomena.  Carbon-14
labeled naphthalene is mineralized slowly
(255/30 days) in nutrient nitrogen defi-
cient cultures of P. ohrysosporium.  How-
ever, when 1''c-naphthalene was added to  •
cultures containing coal tar contaminated
soil, Tween 20 and veratryl alcohol, 32?
of the 1^C-naphthalene was mineralized
during the same incubation period (.Bumpus,,
and Aust, unpublished observation).
                                           -415-

-------
TABLE 2.  MINERALIZATION OF BIPHENYL AND POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS BY £. CHRYSOSPORIUMa
                               Initial
                            Concentration
                           (nmoles/oulture)
         Amount
      Mineralized13
    (pmoles/culture)
% Mineralized13
Biphenyl
Aroclor 1212
Aroclor 1254
2,H,5,2',4',5'-HCBC
1.25
1.-25
1:25
5^0
367 ± 91
254 ± 19
179 ± 47
'57 ± 20
29. 4 ± 7.3
20:3 ± 0:2
14.3 ± 3:8
1.1 ± 0:4
a. Culture conditions were the same as described in Table 1.

b. These values represent the amount or percent of 1l*C-labeled substrate that was
   converted to 1l|C02 in 30 days (mean ± S.D., N = 4 for Biphenyl, Aroclor 1254 and
   2,11,5,2',I1,5'-HCB, N = 3 for Aroclor 1242).

o. Because of the low amounts of 2,4,5,2',4I,5'-HCB that were mineralized, this
   experiment was continued for a total of 115 days.  At the end of this extended
   incubation period 126.0 ± 32.0 pmoles (2;5 ± 0.6?) of the 2,4,5,2',4I,5'-HCB initially
   present had been mineralized.  During this period, supplemental glucose (56 mM) was
   added at 30 day intervals.
Toxloity Problem

     A prerequisite for any microorganism
used in waste treatment systems is the
ability to survive in the presence of the
organopollutants that it is intended to
degrade.  Our toxicity studies have
focused of the ability of £. chrysosporium
to mineralize the fungicide; pentachloro-
phenol.  We have shown that, like a number
of other organopollutants,  '^c-PCP mineral-
ization is promoted in nutrient nitrogen
deficient cultures of £. chrysosporium
whereas mineralization is suppressed in
nutrient nitrogen sufficient cultures,
thus suggesting that mineralization is
due, at least in part, to the lignin
degrading system of this funugs (9).
Furthermore, our studies demonstrated that
the initial rate and the extent of mineral-
ization increased with respect to I^C-PCP
concentration over the range of 16.6 ppb
to 333 ppb (Bumpus and Aust, unpublished
observation).  Attempts to  study 1J*C-PCP
mineralization at higher concentrations
(i.e. in the parts per million range) were
hindered because PCP concentrations higher
than 4 ppm were lethal to the fungus when
cultures were intiated with spores.  The
problem of lethality was circumvented by
allowing cultures of P_. chrysosporium to
grow for six days before adding PCP.  In
these studies (Table 3), in which toxicity
was measured by the ability of PCP to
inhibit respiration (i.e. conversion of
1llC-glucose to 1^002),'it was shown that
although PCP concentrations between 10 and
100 ppm caused substantial inhibition of
respiration, they were not lethal to the
fungus.  And, significantly, substantial
amounts of 14c-PCP were still degraded as
shown in disappearance and mineralization
studies.

     In other studies we have shown that
this microorganism was able to survive in
the presence of a number of relatively
adverse conditions.  For example, we have
shown this fungus was able to grow in the
presence of high concentrations (300 ppm)
of DDT, used motor oil (20% w/w) and coal
tar contaminated soils.

     Taken together, these results suggest
that conditons may be developed which will
allow this fungus to grow and degrade
organopollutants in a number of potential-
ly toxic environments.  The suitability of
using this microorganism in a given situa-
tion will, of course, require individual-
ized study of the site in question.
                                           -416-

-------
         TABLE 3-  Mineralization and Disappearance of PCP by P. chrysosporiuma
 Initial Concentration
         of PCP
 nmoles/culture
                   ppm
Amount Mineralized
  nmoles/culture
% Mineralized
% Disappearance
37.5
375:0
3750.0
1
10b
100b
18.8 ±1.9
'158 ± 45
841 ±615
50.1 ± 5.1
42.1 ± 12.0
22.- 4 ± 16.4
100°
N.D.d
95
a. Each culture (10 ml) was allowed to grow for 6 days at which time PCP was added in a
   minimal volume of acetone (< 20 ul).  Other culture conditions were the same as those
   described in Table 1 .  Cultures were incubated for 30 days.

b. PCP caused 57.1 ± 37% and 74.3 ± 12.5? inhibition of the initial rate of respiration
   in cultures containing 10 and 100 ppm PCP, respectively.  Respiration was measured as
   the amount of ^C02 evolved from 1^C-glucose per day.
c. Detection limit = 50 ppb

d. Not determined.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     This research was supported by Cooper-
ative Agreement CR813369, U.S. Environment-
al Protection Agency, Office of Research
and Development, Hazardous Waste Engineer-
ing Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH,
P.R. Sferra, Project Officer.  The authors
also wish to thank Teresa Vollmer for her
expert secretarial assistance.

REFERENCES
     Arjmand, M. and H. Sandermann, 1985.
     Mineralization of Chloroaniline/Lig-
     nin Conjugates and of Free Chloroani-
     lines by the White Rot Fungus Phanero-
     chaete chrysosporium.  J. Agric. Food
     Chem. 33:1055-1060.      '       '
     Bumpus, J.A., M. Tien, D. Wright, and
     S.D. Aust, 1985a.  Oxidation of Per-
     sistent Environmental Pollutants by a
     White Rot Fungus.  Science  228:1434-
     1436.

     Bumpus, J.A. and S.D. Aust, 1985.
     Studies on the Biodegradation of
     Organopollutants by a White Rot
     Fungus.  Proceedings of the Interna-
     tional'Conference on New Frontiers
                       for Hazardous Waste Management.
                       United States Environmental
                       Protection Agency, EPA/600/9-85/025,
                       Pittsburgh, PA, pp404-4!0.

                       Bumpus, J.A., M. Tien, D. Wright, and
                       S.D. Aust; t985b.  Biodegradation of
                       Environmental Pollutants by the White
                       Rot Fungus Phanerochaete
                       chrysospor ium.  Proceedings of the
                       Eleventh Annual Research Symposium on
                       Incineration and Treatment of
                       Hazardous Waste.  United States
                       Environmental Protection Agency,
                       EPA/600/9-85/028, Cincinnati, OH,
                       pp120-126.

                       Bumpus, J.A. and S.D. Aust, 1986a.
                       Biological Oxidations by Enzymes from
                       a White Rot Fungus.  American
                       Institute of Chemical Engineers 1986
                       Summer Meeting, Boston, MA, paper
                       86c.

                       Bumpus, J.A. and S.D. Aust, 1986b.
                       Biodegradation of Chlorinated Organic
                       Compounds by Phanerochaete
                       chrysosporium, A Wood Rotting Fungus.
                       Solving Hazardous Waste Problems (ACS
                       Symposium Series), (J.H. Exner, ed.),
                       ACS Books, Washington, D.C. (In
                       Press).                  '  '
                                           -417-

-------
7.   Bumpus, J.A. and S.D. Aust, 1987a.
     Biodegradation of Environmental Pollu-
     tants by the White Rot Fungus Phanero-
     chaete chrysospor ium:  Involvement of
     the Lignin Degrading System.
     BioEssays 6:166-170.

8.   Bumpus, J.A. and S.D. Aust, 1987b.
     Biodegradation of DDT (1,1,1-tri-'
     chloro-2,2-bis (1-chlorophenyl) ethane
     by the White Rot Fungus Phanerochaete
     chrysosporium. (Submitted).

9.   Bumpus, J.A. and S.D. Aust, 1987o.
     Mineralization of Recalcitrant Envi-
     ronmental Pollutants by a White Rot
     Fungus.  Proceedings of the National
     Conference on Hazardous Wastes and
     Hazardous Materials, Hazardous Materi-
     als Control Research Institute,
     Silver Spring, MD. Library of
     Congress Catalog No. 87-80469, pp.
     116-151.

10.  Crawford, R, 1981.  Lignin Biodegrada-
     tion and Transformation.  John Wiley
     and Sons, Inc., NY, p15l.

11.  Eaton, D.C., 1985. Mineralization of
     Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Phanero-
     chaete chrysosporium;  A Ligninolytic
     Fungus.  Enzyme Microb. Technol.
     7:191-196.

12.  Haemmerli, S.D.,  M.S.A. Leisola, D.
     Sanglard, and A.  Fiechter, 1986.
     Oxidation of Benzo[a]pyrene'by Extra-
     cellular Ligninases of Phanerochaete
     chrysosporium;  Veratryl alcohol and
     Stability of Ligninases.  J.  Biol.
     Chem. 261:6900-6903.

13.  Hamrael, K.E., Kalyanaraman and T.K.
     Kirk, 1986.' Oxidation of Polycyclic
     Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Dibenzo[pJ-
     dioxins by Phanerochaete chrysospori-
     um Ligninase.  J. Biol. Chem.
     261:16918-16952.'

11.  Harvey, R.J., H.E. Schoemaker, and
     J.M. Palmer,' 1986.  Veratryl Alcohol
     as a Mediator'and'the Role of Radical
     Cations in Lignin Biodegradation by
     Phanerochaete chrysosporium.   FEES
     Lett. 195:212-216.

15.  Johnson, R.E, 1976.  DDT Metabolism
     in Microbial Systems.   Residue
     Reviews:  Residues of Pesticides and
     Other Contaminants in the Total
     Environment.  61:1-28.

16.  Kirk, T.K., E. Schultz, W.J. Connors,
   '  L.F. Lorenz, and J.G. Zeikus, 1978.
     Influence of Culture'Parameters on
     Lignin Metabolism by Phanerochaete
     chrysospor ium.  Arch. Microbiol.
     117:277-285.  '

17.  Lai, R. and D.M. Saxena, 1982.  Accum-
   '  ulation, Metabolism and Effects of
     Organochlorine Insecticides on Micro-
     organisms.  Microbiological Reviews
     16:95-127.'

18.  Muir, D.C.G., A.L. Yarechewski, R.L.
'   '  Corbet, G:R;B. Webster, and A.E.  '  •
     Smith, 1985:  'Laboratory and Field
     Studies'on the Fate of 1,3,6,8-Tetra-
     chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in Soil and
     Sediments.  J. Agric. Food Chem.
     33:518-523.   '
19.  Peterson, J.G. and W.H. Roblson, 1961.
'   '  Metabolic Products of p,p'-DDT in'the'
     Rat.  Toxicology and Applied Pharma-
     cology 6:321-327.

20.  Sanglard, D., M.S.A. Leisola, and
   '  A.Fiechter, 1986.  Role of Extracellu-
     lar Ligninases in Biodegradation of
     Benzo[a]pyrene by Phanerochaete
     chrysosporium.  Enzyme Microbiol.
     Teohnol. 8:209-212.

21.  Tien, M. and T.K. Kirk, 1983.  Lignin
 '  '  Degrading Enzyme from the Hymenomy-
     cete Phanerochaete ohrysosporium
     Burds.  Science 221:661-663.

22.  Tien, M. and T.K. Kirk, 1985.  Lignin-
     Degrading Enzyme'from Phaneroohaete
     chrysospor ium;  Purification, Charac-
     terization, and Catalytic Properties
     of a Unique H202~Requiring Oxygenase.
     Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:2280-  '
     2281;      '
                                           -418-

-------
       GROWTH OF THE WHITE-ROT FUNGUS PHANEROCHAETE CHRYSOSPORIUM IN SOIL

                 Richard T. Lamar1, Michael J. Larsen1, T. Kent Kirk1 and John A. Glaser2
                       1USDA Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
                          2Hazardous Waste and Engineering Research Laboratory,
                                         Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
                                            ABSTRACT

    Phanerochaete chrysosporium is a white-rot fungus with a demonstrated ability to degrade chlorinated organ-
 ics in pure liquid culture to carbon dioxide. This ability suggests that the fungus may have potential as an in situ
 hazardous waste degrader.  However, no data exist regarding the ability of P. chrysosporium  to survive and
 grow in soil. That information is required for an effective evaluation of the ability of the fungus to degrade orga-
 no-pollutants in situ.  The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of soil biotfc and abiotic factors
 on survival and growth of the organism. This paper will summarize our research results to date on the effects of
 soil type, temperature, water potential and acidity on growth of the fungus in sterile soils.
INTRODUCTION

    The fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium Burds.
(Burdsall and Eslyn 1974) (Basidiomycotina, Corticia-
ceae), has been shown to oxidize several halogenated
aromatic pollutants to carbon dioxide and has been
proposed as an agent for biological treatment of recal-
citrant organo-halides (Eaton 1985; Bumpus et al.
1985; Huynh et al. 1985). On-site processing or in
situ hazardous waste treatment methods that employ
P. chrysosporium will require application of the fun-
gus to soil for treatment of contaminants. Phanero-
chaete chrysosporium  is a white-rot wood decay fun-
gus that is often found in wood chip storage piles
(Burdsall and Eslyn 1974). Its growth in soils has not
been reported. Therefore, the ability of the fungus to
grow in soils, as well as abiotic and biotic soil factors
affecting fungal survival, growth and degradative abil-
ity must be determined before the possibility of devel-
oping a biological treatment method can be evaluated.
   The investigations reported in this paper were de-
signed to assess the effects of various soil types, wa-
ter potentials and temperatures on growth of P. chry-
sosporium  in sterile soils. Hazardous waste sites oc-
cur on a great variety of soil types. Soil water potential
and temperature are major factors influencing both
fungal growth and decomposition processes (Cooke
 and Rayner 1984). These parameters were chosen for
 the initial studies described here, because an assess-
 ment of their influence should yield information criti-
 cal to future investigations into the degradative ability
 of P. chrysosporium  in soil, and ultimately to the de-
 velopment of a biological treatment method.
Materials and Methods

Inoculum Preparation

    Phanerochaete chrysosporium Burds. (BKM F-
1767; ATCC no. 24725) was maintained at room tem-
perature (25°C) on 2% malt agar slants (Kirk et al.
1978). Soil inoculum consisted of aspen (Populus
tremuloides Michx.) pulpwood chips (1.5 x 0.5 x
0.25 cm3) thoroughly grown through with P. chrysos-
porium .  Chips were inoculated with mycelial sus-
pensions of the fungus as follows: The fungus was
cultured in 125-ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 10 ml
of basal medium (Kirk etal. 1978).  Inoculum for
these starter cultures consisted of conidial suspensions
taken from two-week-old slants (Kirk et aL 1978).
After incubating at 39°C for 1.5 d in Erlenmeyer
flasks, mycelial mats were collected, washed with
sterile deionized distilled water and fragmented in a
                                                 -419-

-------
blender. The resulting slurry was resuspended in the
volume of sterile deionized distilled water needed to
adjust the moisture content of the aspen chips to 60%
(dry weight basis). Aspen chips had been sterilized by
autoclaving in aluminum foil-covered 2-L Erlenmeyer
flasks at 121'C and 103.5 kPa., for 1 h. Mycelia
were added to sterile chips at a rate of 0.02% myce-
lia:chips (w/w, dry weight basis). Inoculated chips
were incubated at 39*C for approximately 3 wk.

Soils

   Soil samples from the A horizons of Marsham
sandy loam (Fine-silty, mixed, mesic, Mollic-
Hapludalf); Xurich sandy loam (Fine-silty over sandy,
mixed, mesic, Typic-Haplaquoll) and the B2t horizon
of Batavia silty clay loam (Fine-silty, mixed, mesic,
Typic-Hapludalf) were used in the present study. Soils
were air-dried, passed through a 2 mm sieve and
stored in 4-mil plastic bags at 4°C. Samples of each
soil were analyzed for physical and chemical proper-
ties by Dr. M. F. Jurgensen of the Michigan Techno-
logical University, School of Forestry and Wood
Products, Houghton, Michigan.  These soils were
chosen to represent ranges of texture, acidity and or-
ganic matter and nutrient contents. Results of soil
chemical analyses are presented in Table 1.

Experimental Design

    An experiment designed to test the influence of
soil type, water potential and temperature on growth of
P. chrysosporium in sterile soils consisted of a 3 x 3
x 3 factorial in a completely randomized design; the
experiment was repeated once.
    Moisture content of each soil was adjusted to lev-
els corresponding to soil water potentials of -0.03, -
0.15 and -1.5 MPa.  Petti plates  (20 x 90mm diam.)
were filled with soil; within a soil type, an equal
weight of soil on a dry weight basis was added to each
plate. The weight of each filled plate was recorded and
soils and plates sterilized by autoclaving for 0.5 h at
121'C and 103.5 kPa. Autoclaving was performed on
each of three consecutive days to assure sterility; no
contamination problems were encountered.
    Soils were inoculated by aseptically placing an in-
oculum chip into the soil in the center of a plate. Con-
trols were prepared by inoculating plates with inocu-
lum chips which had been re-sterilized by autoclaving
for 1 h at 121'C and 103.5 kPa.  Plates were then
placed in incubators held at 25°, 30' and 39°C. Soil
water potentials were maintained daily by weighing
each plate and adjusting, if necessary, with the appro-
priate amount of sterile deionized distilled water. Each
run of the experiment was 2 weeks in duration.
    In a separate experiment the effect of acidity on
growth of P. chrysosporium in the Batavia soil was
investigated. Appropriate amounts of CaCO^ were
added to Batavia soil to raise the pH 1 and 2 pH units
above the original (pH 4.8). Studies showed that 1 g
of CaCO3 per kg of Batavia soil and a 2-week incuba-
tion period were required to raise the pH value of the
soil 1 unit. After autoclaving, pH values were 4.8,5.8
and 6.8. Soil water potential was adjusted to -0.03
MPa. Sterilization and inoculation procedures were as
previously described. The experiment was 2 weeks
long.

Growth  Assessment

   At the end of 2 wk, growth of P. chrysosporium
was assessed using a qualitative rating system. This
system was based on a visual assessment of the
amount of growth by the fungus over the soil surface.
The rating system was as follows:

 Growth rating-description

 0-no growth of fungus from chip into soil
 1-some hyphae growing from chip into soil
 2-some scattered hyphal growth in the vicinity of the
   chip plus some conidiation
 3-medium coverage of soil surface by hyphae plus
  conidiation
 4-medium-dense coverage of soil surface plus dense
  conidiation
 5-dense  coverage of soil surface plus dense conidia
   tion

   A rank transformation approach was used to ana-
lyze the data. The entire set of observations (i.e.
growth ratings) were ranked, with the smallest obser-
vation having rank 1, the second smallest rank 2, and
so on. Average ranks were assigned ties (Conover and
Iman 1981). The transformed data were subjected to
analysis  of variance and reported as ranks of the
growth assessment data.  Soil type means were com-
pared using Tukey's HSD method.  All other treatment
means were compared using single degree of freedom
contrasts (Chew 1977).

Results and Discussion

Soil Type

     Soil type greatly influenced growth of P. chrysos-
porium  (p = .0001) . Growth of the fungus was
 greatest in the Marsham, intermediate in the Xurich
 and least in the Batavia soil (Table  2). It is interesting
to consider which factor(s) were responsible for the
growth differences of P. chrysosporium among the
three soils.
    Soil acidity is one possibility. Cooke and Rayner
                                                -420-

-------
 Table 1.  Selected soil chemical properties of the three studied soils.
                                                               _Mg_
                                               JL
                             _E	Mn   zn
Soil type   CEC1    BS%      Acidity2    OM%   N%3   Ca
                           -E	A_                                          ppm
                               pH
Batavia     22.9   29.5    5.06   4.65   0.5    0.05    1950   850    145   75   0.6  12.5   1.9    9.7

Marsham   50.7    66.4    7.13   6.59  12.0    0.46    4900 -1650    90   17     1.3   9.0   12.2  11.3

Xurich     16.5    24.0    7.74    7.12  39.0    0.18    1675   640    80   17     0.8  77.5    6.4   3.9
 1 Determined using the Ammonium Acetate Method (Thomas 1982)
  2B= before autoclaving; A= after autoclaving
  3Determined using the Kjeldahl prodedure for Total N  (Bremmer and Mulvaney 1982)
Table 2. Mean growth ranking of Phanerochaete chry-
sosporium in three soils.
     Soil Tvoe

     Batavia

     Marsham

      Xurich
Growth Ranking

     27c*

    80a

    57b
*Means followed by a different letter are significantly
different (Tukey's HSD, a = .05)
 (1984) observed, however, that the influence of soil
 acidity on fungal growth is difficult to assess because
 of the abili ty of fungi to radically alter the pH value of
 theu: environment, and because the effects of acidity
 are modified by so many other environmental factors.
 It was not surprising, therefore, that growth of P.
 chrysosporium, which has an optimum of pH 5.5 in
 liquid culture (Kirk et al. 1978), was greater in the
 neutral to slightly acid Marsham and Xurich soils than
 in the strongly acid Batavia soil. If acidity were re-
 sponsible for the poor growth in the Batavia soil, re-
 ducing soil acidity should have been beneficial. How-
 ever, this was not the case (p = .4523). The failure of
 decreasing soil acidity in the Batavia soil to benefit
 fungal growth, and the observation that optimum
 growth was found in the slightly acid (i.e. pH 6.59)
 Marsham soil when  the optimum far P. chrysospori-
 um in liquid culture is pH 5.5, suggests that soil acid-
 ity does not play a significant role in mediating the
 growth of this fungus in soil. Evidently this organ-
 ism, too, alters the pH value in the vicinity of its hy-
 phae to create a favorable environment.
    A second factor likely to influence growth is soil
 organic matter. The three studied soils differed greatly
 in this respect (Table 1). The ability of P. chrysospori-
 um to assimilate the organic matter in  the three soils is
 unknown.  Given the magnitude of the differences, if
 organic matter content were the primary factor in con-
 trolling growth of P. chrysosporium,  greatest growth
 would have been expected in the Xurich soil. Because
 this was not the case (Table 2), some factor other than
 organic matter content was controlling growth.
    A third factor likely to influence growth is soil ni-
 trogen content. In natural environments, this is the
 nutrient which is most likely to be in such a limited
 supply as to affect mycelial growth (Cooke and Rayn-
 er 1984). Nitrogen content varied greatly between the
 three soils studied. Regression of fungal growth on
 soil nitrogen content revealed a strong positive rela-
 tionship (R2 = .924) (Figure 1). The strength of this
 relationship suggests that soil nitrogen  content played
 a significant role in mediating growth of P. chrysos-
porium .
    Growth habit of the fungus was also affected by
 soil type. In the Marsham and Xurich soils, hyphae
 were observed to be growing primarily across the soil
 surface, although at the highest levels of growth it was
 evident from observing the bottom of the plates that
 the fungus had penetrated through the soil.  In the Ba-
                                                  -421-

-------
     1001
       80-
       60-
       40-
       20
         0.0 0.1  0.2  0.3  0.4  0.5  0.6

                SOIL NITROGEN (%)

 Figure 1. Regression of growth ranking on soil nitro-
 gen content for Phanerochaete chrysosporium grown
 in three soils (y = 123.6x + 26.1, R2 = .924).
tavia soil, hyphae were not observed growing across
the soil surface, but appeared to grow through the soil,
surfacing at various locations.
   There was evidence for an interaction between soil
type and experimental run (p = .0003). This interac-
tion was probably the result of better growth in the
Marsham and Xurich soils in Run 2 than in Run 1
(Figure 2). During Run 1, relative humidity in the in-
cubators was maintained at levels which resulted in ap-
preciable daily soil moisture losses, particularly at 39
"C. During the second run, humidity levels in the in-
                SoilType
                •  Balavia
                   Marsham
                   Xurich
                  1             2
                Experimental Run


Figure 2. Growth ranking of Phanerochaete chrysospori-
um in three soils by experimental run.
cubators were increased and soil moisture losses great-
ly reduced. Phanerochaete chrysosporium  might have
been able to benefit from the increased incubator hu-
midity levels during Rim 2 by obtaining moisture di-
rectly from the atmosphere, or loss of hyphal vigor
due to partial desiccation could have been prevented.
Ether might explain the significantly greater growth of
the fungus in the Marsham and Xurich soils during
Run 2. Because P. chrysosporium  did not grow on
the soil surface in the Batavia soil it would not be ex-
pected to benefit as much from an increase in atmo-
spheric moisture. Indeed, growth of the fungus in the
Batavia soil during Run 2 was not significantly differ-
ent from that in Run 1 (Figure 2). In light  of the
above, the data from each run were analyzed separate-
ly to assess the effect of soil water potential on growth
of P. chrysosporium.

Soil Water Potential

    A significant (p = 0.0002) linear relationship be-
tween growth of P. chrysosporium  and soil water po-
tential over all soils was observed in Run 1 (Figure 3).
In contrast, soil water potential had less influence on
growth in Run 2 (p = .1399). As indicated above,
however, the fungus growing in the Marsham and Xu-
rich soils might have benefited from increased levels
of atmospheric moisture which effectively  masked the
influence of soil water potential on growth. In the Ba-
tavia soil where surface growth of the fungus was
sparse, there was a significant (p = 0.0017) linear rela-
tionship between growth of the fungus and soil water
potential (Fig. 4).
    The linear increase in growth of P. chrysosporium
in response to increasing water potential over the range
     401
                                                         30-
                                                         20-
                                                         10
       0.0     0.5      1.0      1.5      2.0

          SOIL WATER POTENTIAL (-MPa)

Figure 3. Regression of growth ranking on soil water
potential far Phanerochaete chrysosporium grown in
three soils-Run 1 (y = 1.119x + 33.767, R2 = .233).
                                                  -422-

-------
     30-
      20-
  §
  o
      10-
       0
Table 3. Effect of soil temperature on growth ranking
of Phanerochaete chrysosporium in three soils.
        0.0     0.5    1.0    1.5    2.0

        SOIL WATER POTENTIAL (-MPa)

Figure 4. Regression of growth ranking on soil water
potential for Phanerochaete chrysosporium grown in
the Batavia soil-Run 2 (y = 1.299x + 23.551, R2
=.47)

-1.5 to -0.03 MPa is consistent with what other
workers have observed for both wood decay and soil
fungi in general. Griffin (1977) proposed that growth
of wood decay fungi occurs at a decreasing rate from
0 to -4.0 MPa, and presented data indicating that
maximum growth of five wood decay basidiomycetes
occurred at -0.15 MPa osmotic potential. Wood decay
fungi have been placed in a group of organisms,
which includes some soil basidiomycetes and gram- •.
negative bacteria, that is extremely sensitive to water
potential, with an optimum growth response ca. -0.1
MPa osmotic potential, and little growth below -2.0
MPa (Griffin 1981). The optimum soil water potential
range for microbial growth and metabolic activity is
generally considered to be between -0.01 and  -0.03
MPa (Sommers et al. 1981). The soil water potential
growth optimum far P. chrysosporium  might be
greater than -0.03 MPa.
    Sommers et al. (1981) suggested that water po-
tential influences decomposition of soil organic mate-
rials in a 2-phase process whereby an initial rapid de-
crease in decomposition in the -0.03 to -1.5 MPa mat-
ric potential range is followed by a second phase in
which decomposition decreases linearly with decreas-
ing water potential. Therefore, soil water potential op-
tima for growth of, and degradatiye activity by, P.
chrysosporium may be very similar.

Temperature

   Evidence was obtained for better growth of P.
chrysosporium at 30°  and 39°C compared to growth
of the fungus at 25°C (Table 3). The magnitude of
                                                      Soil
                                                                      Soil Temperature ("O
               39°
30°
25°
p*
Batavia
Marsham
Xurich
28
86
64
31
89
59
21
66
47
.1198
.0170
.0531

 * Probability of a larger F value for the single degree of
 freedom contrast of growth at 30° and 39°C versus
 growth at 25°C.
this difference appeared to be directly related to the rel-
ative growth among soil types. Most soil fungi are
mesophiles with temperature optima between 25° and
35°C, but with an ability to grow from ca 15° to 45°C
(Cooke and Rayner 1984). Phanerochaete chrysospori-
um is also mesophilic and has a temperature optimum
of ca. 39°C on 2% malt agar (Burdsall and Eslyn
1974). Ability of the fungus to grow as well at 30°C as
it did at 39°C was not expected. It is possible that at
39°C some other factor (e.g. nutrient availability or wa-
ter stress) offsets the benefits of the more optimal tem-
perature. However, P. chrysosporium did not appear
to exploit the total soil volume in any of the plates, indi-
cating that nutrient pools were also not fully exploited.
Studies are underway to determine the minimum tem-
perature at which P. chrysosporium will grow in the
soil.

Conclusions

   All parameters investigated, except acidity, in-   «'
fluenced growth.of P. chrysosporium in the three soil
types.  Soil type had a significant effect on growth and
growth habit. Nitrogen content appeared to play a ma-
jor role in mediating growth of the fungus in the soils,  ,
and could well have been responsible for the differenc-
es in fungal growth among the soil types. Future stud-
ies to elucidate the extent to which available nitrogen in-
fluences growth of P. chrysosporium in soil are war-
ranted. Increasing soil water potential from -1.5 MPa
to -0.03 MPa resulted in greatly increased growth of P.
chrysosporium. The data indicate that growth of the
fungus might benefit from soil water potentials above -
0.03 MPa.  Growth of the fungus was significantly
greater at 30° and 39°C than at 25°C.
                                               -423-

-------
Acknowledgments

   The authors wish to thank C B. Davey for critical
review of the manuscript and D. M. Dietrich for techni-
cal assistance.
Literature Cited

 1. Bremmer, J.M. and C.S. Mulvaney. 1982. Nitro
   gen-Total. In: Methods and Principles of Soil Anal
   ysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Proper
   ties-Agronomy Monograph no. 9 (2nd Edition).

 2. Bumpus, J.A., M. Tien, D. Wright and S.D. Aust.
    1985. Oxidation of persistent environmental
    pollutants by a white rot fungus. Science
    228:1434-1436.

  3. Burdsall, H.H., Jr. and W.E. Eslyn. 1974. A new
    Phanerochaete vntha. Chrysosporium
    imperfect state. Mycotaxon 1:123-133.

 4. Chew, V. 1977. Comparisons among treatment
    means in analysis of variance. Agric. Res. Ser.
    H-6. 60pp.

 5. Conover, WJ. and R. L. Iman. 1981. Rank trans
    formations as a bridge between parametric
    and non-parametric statistics. American Statistician
    35(3):124-129.

 6. Cooke, R.C. and A.D.M. Rayner. 1984. Ecology
    of saprophytic fungi. New York:Longman
    415pp.

 7. Eaton, D.C. 1985. Mineralization of polychlorinat
    ed biphenyls by Phanerochaete chrysosporium: a
    ligninolytic fungus. Enzyme Microb. Technol.
    7:194-196.

  8. Griffin, D.M. 1981. Water and microbial stress.
    Adv. Microbial Ecol. 5:91-136.

  9. Griffin, D.M. 1977. Water potential and wood de
     cay fungi. Ann. Rev. Phytopathology
     15:319-329.

   10. Huynh, V.-B., H.-M. Chang, T.W. Joyce and
      T.K. Kirk. 1985. Dechlorination  of
      chloro-organics by a white-rot fungus. Tappi J.
      68:98-102.
11. Kirk, T.K., E. Schultz, W.J. Connors, L.F. Lo
   renz and J.G. Zeikus. 1978. Influence of culture
   parameters on lignin metabolism by Phanero
   chaste chrysosporium. Arch. Microbiol. 117:277-
    285.

12. Seitz, L. M., D. B. Sauer, R. Burroughs, H. E.
   Mohr and J. D. Hubbard. 1979. Ergosterol as
   a measure of fungal growth. Phytopathology
   69:12024203.

13. Sommers, L.E., C.M. Gilmour, R.E. Wilding and
   S.M.Beck. 1981. The effect of water potential on
   decomposition processes in soils, pp. 97-118. In:
   Water potential relations in soil microbiology.
    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Spec. Pub. No. 9.

14. Thomas, G.W. 1982. Exchangeable cations. In:
   Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and
   Microbiological Properties-Agronomy Monograph
   no. 9 (2nd Edition).
                                                -424-

-------
                           BIOLOGICAL  TREATMENT OF  SELECTED AQUEOUS
                                   ORGANIC  HAZARDOUS WASTES


                   Richard  J.Lesiecki, Margaret K. Koczwara, James E. Park
                                   University  of Cincinnati
                         Dept.  of Civil and Environmental Engineering
                                   Cincinnati, Ohio  45221
                                  i
                                      Douglas W. Grosse
                            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                       Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                                   Cincinnati, Ohio  45268


                                           ABSTRACT

     This  paper describes  tests performed  in order to evaluate the fate of aqueous organic
 hazardous  waste compounds  in the activated sludge process.  Gas, liquid and waste solids
 samples were taken from  acclimated activated sludge systems to determine amounts that were
 volatilized, biodegraded and associated with the wasted solids.  Results discussed here
 include two compounds, methyl  ethyl ketone and 1,1,1 trichloroethane.
 INTRODUCTION

     With the reauthorization of RCRA and
 the concurrent restrictions on land dis-
 posal of hazardous wastes, the EPA is
 assessing waste treatment technique's that
 can be substitutes for, or precursors to,
 land disposal.  Concentrations of
 hazardous, organic compounds .in aqueous,
 RCRA listed wastes must be greatly reduced
 in order to achieve levels acceptable for
 land disposal.  For this type of waste in
 concentrations up to 10,000 ppm, the
 activated sludge process is a potentially
 applicable treatment process.  However, a
 lack of data on the treatment of solvents
 at high concentrations exists.

     To fulfill  this need, two bench-scale
 activated sludge systems were constructed.
The systems were operated at a theoretical
 10-day solids retention time (SRT)  with a
24-hour hydraulic retention time (HRT).
Each system was  fed a synthetic wastewater
 spiked with the  test compound.  Compounds
tested in this study were methyl  ethyl
ketone (MEK) and 1,1,1 trichloroethane
 (TCA).  Each compound was tested at two
concentrations.
       The  purpose of this program was to
 study  the  changes in fate of selected
 organic priority pollutants in continuous
 bench-scale activated sludge systems over a
 broad  concentration range.  This informa-
 ti&n will  be helpful id determining whether
 or not this treatment process introduces
 toxic  compounds to the atmosphere, concen-
 trates them in the wasted sludge, or
 destroys them via biodegradation.

 MATERIALS  & METHODS

     Two completely mixed, continuous flow,
 bench-scale activated sludge systems were
 utilized.  Each system consisted of a pyrex
 glass column 15.2 cm in diameter and 91.4
 cm in height.  The total  liquid volume was
 11 liters with a depth of 58.4 cm.   This
 allows for an air volume above the liquid
 level of 5.7 liters.  A metal  plate with
 inlet and outlet holes covers  the top of
 the reactor.  Ports  are located along the
 side of the reactor  for inlet/outlet  lines.
An airstone located  just  above the  bottom
of the reactor diffuses air  into  the  system
 for mixing and aerating  purposes.  Air flow
 rate and pressure were monitored.  Air flow
 rates varied between approximately
                                         -425-

-------
800 ml/min to 1800 ml/min depending on the
dissolved oxygen (D.O.) concentration and
mixed liquor solids concentration of the
reactor.

     The primary and secondary clarifiers
were also made of pyrex glass and were the
same size.  A glass dome, with inlet and
outlet ports for air venting and sampling
purposes, covered each clarifier.  Each had
a liquid volume of 1.5 liters with an air
head space volume of 0.8 liters.  Liquid
flowed by gravity in sequence from the
primary clarifier to the reactor and on to
the secondary clarifier.  A recycle pump
connected to a timer was used to periodi-
cally transfer the settled secondary solids
back to the reactor.  Solids were wasted
directly from the reactor by a pump
connected to a timer.  Synthetic feed was
peristaltically pumped from a refrigerated
stock solution to the primary clarifier.
The organic spike compound was introduced
to the feed lines by means of a syringe
pump.  A static,  in-line mixer was  used
immediately in front of the primary
clarifier to blend the spike with  the  feed.
Off-gases from the reactor and clarifiers
were  vented.

      The activated sludge systems  were used
to treat a  synthetic wastewater  consisting
of a  "base mix"  plus the selected  priority
pollutant  of  interest.   The  synthetic feed
was  prepared  daily and stored at 4°C.   The
base mix  constituents  are listed  in Table 1.

                   Table  1

        Synthetic Feed  Constituents
  Ethylene glycol
  Ethyl alcohol
  Acetic acid
  Phosphoric acid
  Glutamic acid
  Glucose
Phenol
Ammonium sulfate
Magnesium sulfate
Manganese sulfate
Calcium chloride
Ferric chloride
 The base mix was diluted so that the
 wastewater exerted a 5-day Soluble
 Biochemical Oxygen Demand (SBODs) of
 approximately 500 mg/1, with an average
 Soluble Organic Carbon (SOC) of 420 mg/1.
 This synthetic wastewater is the formula
 used by Kincannon, et. al. (1983) in
 studying priority pollutants in activated
 sludge treatment systems.  A synthetic feed
 was chosen over an industrial or municipal
 wastewater for two basic reasons:  A
 synthetic feed is more consistent in terms
of SBODs and SOC concentrations  than  an
industrial  or municipal  wastewater; and
secondly, it facilitates comparisons
between spiked compounds.

     Much of the existing data on the fate
of compounds in activated sludge are  at
concentrations up to 200 mg/1  (e.g.
Kincannon et. al., 1983).  Based on this,
initial concentrations not exceeding
200 mg/1 were chosen.  The first measured
concentrations tested were 55  mg/1 for MEK
and 141 mg/1 for TCA.  The second
concentrations tested were 430 mg/1 for  MEK
and 174 mg/1 for TCA.  The addition of MEK
increased the influent SBODs to 620 mg/1
and 1340 mg/1 for each concentration
respectively.  The addition of TCA had a
negligible affect on the influent SBOD5  at
either  concentration.

     Return activated sludge, for the
purpose of  initial seeding, was obtained
from a  large-scale system at the EPA Test
and Evaluation  (T&E) Facility.  A 100 ml
sample  pf primary effluent from the same
large-scale  system was added daily to each
systems' reactor throughout the study.
This was done to provide a continued supply
of organisms found in wastewater that are
not available in a synthetic  feed.  The two
individual  systems were  acclimated to the
synthetic wastewater for at least one month
before the  spike was introduced.  Both  sys-
tems were allowed to acclimate  to the first
spike  concentration  for  at least a month.
A theoretical  solids retention  time  (SRT)
of 10  days  was  targeted,  controlled  by
wasting 10% of  the  reactor  volume over  a  24
hour  period.  Average SRT's were about  7
days  for both  systems,  due to a loss  of
solids in  the  effluent.   The  hydraulic
 retention  time  (HRT) was 24 hours.   Routine
 process performance  monitoring  measurements
and  their  respective frequencies  are listed
 in Table 2.

      When  the systems assumed steady state
 conditions following acclimation to  the_
 spike compound, a two-week  sampling  period
 ensued.  During the sampling  period, sam-
 ples for gas chromatograph  analyses  were
 taken three times a week for the two weeks.
 Samples taken during this period consisted
 of 24 hour composite liquid influent and
 effluent samples (pumped to teflon bags to
 minimize volatilization), a 24-hour
 composite wasted mixed liquor sample, a
 grab primary effluent liquid sample  and
 grab off-gas samples from the primary and
                                            -426-

-------
  Table 2 Routine Process Monitoring

Measurement       Frequency     Method
SB005
SOC
TSS/VSS
D.O.
D.Q. Uptake Rate
  USEPA (1983)
3 x per wk
5 x per wk
1 x per day
6 x per day
1 x per day
EPA 405.1*
EPA 415.2*
EPA 160.1*
EPA 360.1*
Std. Meth.
  213A
secondary clarifiers, as well as the
reactor.  All liquid composite samples were
kept at 4°C.  Liquid samples were trans-
ferred to clean amber glass bottles with
Teflon caps, sealed with no headspace.
Off-gases were sampled using 0.63 cm O.D.
borosilicate glass sorbent tubes containing
0.25 g Tenax.  Two tubes were used in
series for each sample.  Air sampling pumps
were used to provide a constant air flow
rate, which was further controlled by
needle valves and measured by rotameters.
Purified air at atmospheric pressure was
used to replace the off-gas removed from
the clarifiers.

     Methyl ethyl  ketone measurements were
obtained by EPA Method 8015 (SW-846, 3rd
ed., 1986).  EPA Method 601 for Purgeable
Halocarbons was used to measure 1,1,1
trichloroethane (Federal  Register,  40 CFR
Part 136, Part VIII, 10/26/84).
                                          Table 3

                           Process  Monitoring Data  for  MEK  System
                          	(all  values in  mg/1)
                      MEK Concentration
                          55  mg/1
              Before  Testing
              During Testing
             Mean    Std.  Dev.    Mean    Std.  Dev.
 MLVSS        779        121       1093
 EFF. VSS     101        62       44
 EFFL.  SBOD5  —        	       16
 EFFL.  SOC     38        21       17
                      336
                       22
                        8
                        6
                                            MEK Concentration
                                                430 mg/1
                       Before Testing
                                                                          During Testing
                                    Mean   Std. Dev.   Mean   Std. Dev.
                      2430
                       55
                       33
                       10
                  298
                   30
                   56
                    6
2189
 84
 23
  4
182
 57
 19
  4
                                         Table 4

                          Process Monitoring Data for TCA System
                                   (all values in mg/1)
                     TCA Concentration
                       • 141 mg/1
             Before Testing
              During Testing
            Mean   Std. Dev.   Mean   Std. Dev.
MLVSS       958      129       1335
EFFL. VSS   134      112        91
EFFL. SBOD5  17       16        63
EFFL. SOC    20       12        27
                      178
                       65
                       53
                       14
                                            TCA Concentration
                                                174 mg/1
                       Before Testing

                      Mean   Std. Dev.
                      682
                      327
                        6
                       13
                221
                 58
                  4
                           During Testing

                          Mean   Std. Dev.
467
345
 10
29
75
 3
 1
                                         -427-

-------
RESULTS

     Two organic compounds, each at two
concentrations, have been studied in the
completely-mixed, continuous flow,
activated sludge systems.  Table 3 and
Table 4 summarize basic process monitoring
data used to assess the systems' perfor-
mance.  Mean values with standard
deviations for a two-week period prior to
testing, and during the test period itself,
are presented.  All test period values are
14-day means, except TCA concentration #2,
Which is a 3-day mean.  Because a five-week
period separated sample days two and three
thru seven for the first MEK concentration,
                   the data for the two weeks prior to testing
                   are prior to the last five sample days.

                        For the first concentration of each
                   compound seven  data points were collected.
                   For the second  concentration, six data
                   points for  MEK  and three data points for
                   TCA were collected.  The average mass
                   fluxes with the mean percentages of the
                   influent mass distributed to each fraction,
                   as calculated from an average mass balance
                   around the  primary clarifier and both the
                   reactor and secondary clarifier, are shown
                   in Tables 5 and 6.  Data from the second
                   TCA concentration were  excluded since this
                   concentration was  inhibitory to the system.
                                          Table 5

                              Fates of MEK in Activated Sludge
                                 MEK  Concentration
                                     55 mg/1
                                          MEK Concentration
                                              430 mg/1
  Influent
  Primary Effluent
  Primary Volatilization
  Unknown Primary
  Loss (+)/Gain (-)
                              Flux
                            (mg/min)
 0.418
 0.404
 0.046
-0.030
                Percent
                                             PRIMARY  MASS  BALANCE
96.7
11.0
-7.7
                       Flux
                     (mg/min)
 3.269
 3.358
 0.084
-0.170
                                             SECONDARY MASS BALANCE
                                                                                 Percent
102.7
  2.6
 -5.2
Reactor Influent
Apparent Biodegradation
Reactor Stripping
Secondary Volatilization
Waste Sludge
Effluent
0.404
0.382
0.012
0.0002
0.0004
0.009
94.6
3.0
0.1
0.1
2.3
3.358
3.012
0.342
0.003
0.000
0.001
89.7
10.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
                                            -428-

-------
                                          Table 6

                              Fates of TCA in Activated Sludge
       Influent
       Primary Effluent
       Primary Volatilization
       Unknown Primary
       Loss(+)/Gain(-)
       Reactor Influent
       Apparent Biodegradation
       Reactor Stripping
       Secondary Volatilization
       Waste Sludge
       Effluent
          TCA Concentration
              . 141  mg/1

              Flux  (mg/min)

              PRIMARY  MASS BALANCE

                 1.072
                 0.741
                 0.221
                 0.110


              SECONDARY MASS BALANCE

                 0.741
                 0.161
                 0.565
                 0.004
                 0.001
                 0.010
                                                                Percent
 69.0
 20.6
 10.4
21.8
76.2
 0.5
 0.1
 1.4
                                         Table 7

                        Removal Efficiencies of Organic Pollutants
Compound
  Influent (mg/1)
Mean     Std. Dev.
                                                   Effluent (mg/1)
                                                  Mean    Std. Dev.
        Percent Overall
Methyl ethyl ketone

1,1,1 Trichloroethane

55
430
141
174
9
59
37
32
0.5
0.9
3.8
3.5
1.2
0.3
6.5
0.3
>99
>99
97
98
DISCUSSION

     Table 7 summarizes the overall organic
pollutant removal efficiencies of both
systems at each concentration.  It is seen
that greater than 89% of the MEK was bio-
degraded at both concentrations.  The large
increase in MLVSS concentrations after the
increase in MEK concentration from 55 mg/1
to 430 mg/1  would seem to support the
notion that MEK is very easily biodegraded.

     Operating the activated sludge system
while it was spiked with MEK was somewhat
                   difficult.  The floe formed in the system
                   was fine and light, hence, not settling
                   well.  Bridging at the bottom of the secon-
                   dary clarifier developed, having the effect
                   of lowering the concentration of solids in
                   the return activated sludge (RAS).
                   Therefore, solids were washed out of the  '
                   system in the secondary effluent.  As the
                   MEK concentration increased, secondary
                   effluent solids concentration increased as
                   more solids were being formed in the
                   reactor, compounding the settling problems.
                                         -429-

-------
     Another factor influencing the
performance -of the MEK system may have been
nutrient deficiency.  As the concentration
of MEK was increased, the influent SBODs
increased, but the base mix remained
constant.  This resulted in a decrease of
the ratio of nutrients to SBOD5.  The poor
floe formation observed at the higher MEK
concentration may have been partially
caused by this deficiency.

     As is  shown in Table 6, most of the
TCA was removed via stripping in the
reactor.  This is to be expected since TCA
is highly volatile.  Primary volatilization
and biodeg'radation also accounted for
significant percentages of the  overall
removal.

     As with MEK,  poor  system operation
occurred  when  spiked with TCA.   For  each
concentration  tested, TCA seemed inhibitory
to biological  growth.   This  is  evident  by
the fact  that  initial acclimation took  four
months;  one month  at  10 mg/1  and three
months at HI  mg/1.  Effluent  solids
 concentrations at  141 mg/1  TCA averaged
 approximately 100  mg/1  VSS.   The solids
 were fine and light and did not settle
 well.  When the influent concentration was
 further increased to a measured concen-
 tration of 174 mg/1, the system exhibited
 signs of shock and inhibition.  The primary
 clarifier contents, usually cloudy, turned
 crystal clear.  Little growth occurred in
 the reactor.  Solids did not settle in the
 secondary  clarifier.  Effluent solids
 concentrations were almost the same as
 MLVSS concentrations as shown  in Table 4.

     One major problem encountered when
 working with TCA was in uniformly dis-
 persing  it into the feed solution.  For  the
 first test phase,  an amount equal to
 '295 mg/1 was  injected  into the feed line,
 yet only 141  mg/1 was  measured in the  feed.
 For the  second test  concentration,  an
 amount equal  to 705 mg/1 was  injected,
 whereby  only  174  mg/1  was measured  in  the
 feed,  and  251  mg/1 measured  in the  primary
 effluent.   Many  factors  may  account for
 this  inconsistency including:  the density
of TCA (1.339 g/cc),  low solubility  in
water, volatility, as well  as inadequate
sampling techniques.   Thus, effects  on  the
system may have been.caused by concentra-
tions of TCA higher than reported.

SUMMARY

     This study has shown that methyl  ethyl
ketone and 1,1,1 trichloroethane can be
removed by the activated sludge process,
but both chemicals at the concentrations
tested are disruptive to the basic opera-
tion  of the  unmodified process.  For MEK,
biodegradation was the most important
removal mechanism, while most TCA was
removed via  stripping.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

      This work was carried out at the
USEPA's Test and  Evaluation  Facility in
Cincinnati,  Ohio,  as a  part  of the
Hazardous Waste Engineering  Research
Laboratory  (HWERL),  Technology Treatment
Staff's  Program.   The Technical Project
Monitor  was  Douglas  W.  Grosse.  The gas
 chromatography was performed by EER under
the direction of  Sam Hayes.   The authors
would like to express their gratitude  to
 Terry Harris, Paul Mishurda, Daniel DiCarlo
 and Michael  Morelock for their invaluable
 work.

 REFERENCES

 Kincannon, D.F. et.'al, "Removal  Mechanisms
 for Toxic Priority Pollutants", JWPCF Vol.
 55, No. 2, 1983, pp 157-163

 Standard Methods  for the Examination of
 Water and Wastewater, 16th Ed.,1985,
 APHA-AWWA-WPCF

 USEPA "Methods for  Organic Chemical
 Analysis of Municipal  and Industrial
 Wastewater"  40 CFR  Part 136, Oct. 1984

 USEPA  "Methods for  Chemical  Analysis
  of Water and Wastes" EPA  600/4-79-020,
  March  1983
                                            -430-

-------
              ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR TREATING
                   SPENT ELECTROPLATING SOLUTIONS AND SLUDGES

                      Katherine Driscoll and Barry Kaplan
                              Metcalf & Eddy,  Inc.
                              Wakefield,  MA  01880

                                    ABSTRACT
      Off-site  commercial  hazardous  waste treatment  facilities  were  evaluated
 to  gene'rate  support  data  for  the Environmental  Protection  Agency's  land
 disposal ban.   Establishing treatment standards for electroplating  wastewater
 and sludges  is a high  priority  task with respect to the  land disposal  ban.
 One facility treated electroplating solutions with  cyanide oxidation,
 hexavalent chromium  reduction,  a combination of lime and sulfide
 precipitation,  and vacuum filtration.   Electroplating sludges  were  stabilized
 with  calcium hypochlorite, ferric sulfate or lime.   Of particular interest  is
 the use of waste streams  as treatment reagents.   This report summarizes  data
 used  to evaluate these treatment technologies for electroplating solutions  and
 sludges.
INTRODUCTION

     The RCRA Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of.  1984 mandate
that a ban on the land disposal of
hazardous wastes be  implemented.
EPA will choose the  "best demon-
strated available technology"  (BOAT)
for each waste category banned and
will determine treatment performance
levels for each waste category based
on the BOAT.  Hazardous constituents
of treated wastes must be reduced
below specified levels.  To meet the
provisions of the land disposal ban,
EPA has prioritized waste categories
to be addressed.  Electroplating
wastes and other wastes containing
metals and cyanide are a high
priority.

     In support of the efforts of
the Office of Solid Waste (OSW) to
implement the provisions of the RCRA
land disposal ban,  the Hazardous
Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory (HWERL)  has initiated
several programs to evaluate
alternatives to land disposal.  A
major component of these programs
has been the field evaluation of
existing full-scale commercial
treatment facilities.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

     One facility evaluated under
this program treated wastes
generated by the electroplating
industry, as well as other metal
finishing operations.  The facility
treats liquid wastes by the follow-
ing unit operations:  cyanide
oxidation, hexavalent chromium
reduction, metals precipitation and
vacuum filtration. -Total treatment
capacity for liquid wastes is ten
million gallons per year.  Solid
wastes contaminated with cyanide,
hexavalent chromium, and various
metals are stabilized with calcium
hypochlorite, ferric sulfate
crystals, and lime, respectively.
This process is designed to delist
the solid wastes.   The facility
operates 24 hours per day for six
days a week.
                                     -431-

-------
PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS - LIQUID WASTE

Incoming Waste

     Liquid waste streams, defined
as having less than 20 weight
percent total suspended solids, are
screened to confirm their manifest
composition.  A treatment simulation
is conducted to determine the
required amount of treatment
reagents.  Wastes are segregated by
type:  acid, neutral, alkali,
cyanide content, and hexavalent
chromium content.  If a waste
contains greater than 1 part per
million (ppm) of cyanide, it is
segregated for pretreatment.  Wastes
containing greater than 25,000 ppm
of cyanide are not accepted.  As
many as five separate sources may be
incorporated into one batch for
treatment.

Cyanide Oxidation

     Cyanide wastes are treated by
alkaline chlorination.  A lime
slurry is used for pH adjustment to
10 and a waste sodium hypochlorite
solution is used as the oxidizing
agent.  The cyanide is oxidized to
cyanate in a single-stage batch
reaction.  The amount of
hypochlorite added to each batch is
predetermined by the plant chemist
and controlled by the operator.  The
level of excess hypochlorite is
monitored every 15 minutes by an
operator using potassium iodide
starch test paper.  Additional
hypochlorite is added, if needed, to
maintain an excess concentration of
at least 100 ppm.  One hour after
the initial hypochlorite addition a
filtered sample is analyzed for
amenable cyanide.  Treatment
continues until cyanide is not
detectable in a filtered sample.
The cyanide reaction is optimum at a
pH of 11 to 12.  Since cyanide forms
strong complexes with ferrous iron,
it is important to oxidize the
cyanide before reducing hexavalent
chromium.  Further treatment of the
waste is conducted in the same
reactor tank.

Hexavalent Chromium Reduction

     Hexavalent chromium is reduced
to trivalent chromium in a single-
stage batch reaction, using waste
iron acid as the reducing agent.
The treatment tank is first charged
with lime slurry to minimize
corrosion of the stainless steel
mixing system.  Enough lime slurry
is added to neutralize all waste
acids that would be treated for
hexavalent chromium reduction and
subsequent metals precipitation.
Maintaining an alkaline mixture also
helps to eliminate emissions of by-
product gases (e.g. M02, C12).  The
stoichiometric weight ratio of iron
acid to hexavalent chromium is 3.2
to 1.  A 10 percent excess of iron
is maintained to ensure complete
reduction.  Temperature and pH are
monitored periodically throughout
the reaction.  Treatment is
continued until a spot test shows no
detectable hexavalent chromium.
Additional treatment is conducted in
the same reactor vessel.

Metals Precipitation

     Metals are first precipitated
with a lime slurry.  A predetermined
volume of lime slurry is used which
includes 200 to 300 gallons in
excess of the required volume.  At
the optimum pH range of 8 to 10,
metal cations will precipitate as
insoluble hydroxides.  The process
is dependent on the solubilities of
the metal hydroxides, which are a
function of pH and water quality.
Because each metal hydroxide has a
minimum' solubility at a different
pH, it is difficult to obtain high
removal efficiencies for every
                                       -432-

-------
 metal.  An agitator keeps the
 suspended floe  in suspension.  After
 ten minutes of  agitation the pH  is
 checked.  When  the pH does not
 change with time, the reaction with
 lime is complete.

      Because of stringent discharge
 limits, precipitation with a waste
 sulfide stream  is used as a
 polishing step  to remove the
 remaining dissolved metals.  In
 general, metal  sulfides have lower
. solubilities than metal hydroxides
 at the same pH.  After sulfide
 addition, a filtered sample is
 analyzed for chromium, copper,
 nickel and zinc.  The sample filter
 cake is subjected to an abbreviated
 EP Toxicity test.  The facility has
 determined that if a waste can pass
 their abbreviated test,  it will also
 pass the 21-hour test.  When the
 sample results are acceptable, the
 contents of the tank are pumped to a
 precoat vacuum filter.

 Vacuum Filtration

      The treated wastewater is
 subjected to  vacuum filtration to
 separate liquids and solids.
 Perlite,  a volcanic ash,  is
 currently used as a precoat  although
 diatomaceous  earth has been  used  in
 the past.   The dewatered  solids  fall
 onto a  solids  conveying  system and
 are stored in  a bulk container.   A
 sample  is  subjected to the 24  hour
 EP toxicity test to ensure  the waste
 is nonhazardous.

 Ultimate  Disposal

      The dewatered  sludge is sent to
 the facility's  lined,  nonhazardous
 landfill.  The  filtrate is
 discharged to  the local publicly
 owned treatment  works  (POTW).  The
 facility continuously monitors the
 sewer discharge  to assure compliance
 with local standards.  The liquid
 waste treatment process is
 illustrated in Figure 1.

 Air Emissions

      The facility uses a two-stage
 scrubber to capture fumes from the
 treatment tanks, caustic storage and
 sulfide storage tanks.

      A one-stage scrubber is used to
 capture fumes released from the acid
 storage tanks.   Both scrubbers have
 an induced flow of 1000 standard
 cubic feet per  minute (scfm).  The
 pH in each scrubber is maintained
 between 12 and  14 by the addition of
 sodium hydroxide.  The overflow
 spillage from each scrubber is
 collected in its respective sump and
 pumped to a treatment tank when the
 sump is full.

 PROCESS DESCRIPTION - SOLID WASTE

 Incoming Waste

      Prior to being unloaded at the
 treatment facility,  each  load of
 solid waste is  weighed and tested to
 verify its contents.   A  treatment
 simulation is conducted oh a sample
 to determine the  required  amounts of
 treatment chemicals  and to make sure
 the  waste can pass  the EP  Toxicity
 test.   Incoming loads  are  segregated
 on the basis of their  water  content.

 Treatment

      The  solids handling/treatment
 process  is designed  to delist  solids
 that may  be contaminated with
 cyanide,  hexavalent chromium,  and/or
various other metals.  The untreated
solids are lifted by an overhead
traveling crane into a mix chamber
that  is agitated by a modified
pugmill operation.  After mixing,
bags of reagents are manually added
into the mix cell.  Calcium
                                      -433-

-------
                      LL.O.

                      U.O
                      LUl-
                                     UI U.

                                     QLU

                                     LU>

                                     CEO
                                     LUCC

                                     Ho.
                                     wo
                                     OH
                             O
                             o
                                                   LLJ

                                                   _1

                                                   D.
                       85
                       LULL.
                       cc
                       D-
ujO

e5
z*1-
x
°0
111
LuXUJ
     1
                          zuu
                                          O

                                          Q

                                          CC
                                                           LLJ

                                                           D
                        -434-

-------
 hypochlorite,  ferric  sulfate
 crystals and lime are added for
 sludges contaminated  with cyanide,
 hexavalent  chromium and  various
 metals, respectively.  Water  is also
 added  if the mix is too  dry.  After
 thirty minutes of treatment,  the mix
 cell contents are dropped into a
 roll-off container.   All treated
 solids are  then subjected to  the
 24 hour EP  Toxicity test to confirm
 they have been rendered
 nonhazardous.  Figure 2  depicts the
 solids handling treatment operation.

 Ultimate Disposal

     The delisted sludge is disposed
 of in the facility's  lined,
 nonhazardous landfill.

 SAMPLING RESULTS

     The objective of this sampling
 program was to provide HWERL with
 information on existing  hazardous
 waste treatment technologies which
 provide alternatives  to  land
 disposal.  Specific objectives
 included the following:

         identify industries whose
         wastes are treated by
         alternative  technologies.

         determine treatment
         capacity,  waste acceptance
         criteria and other
         pertinent information about
         each facility.

         evaluate the effectiveness
         of each unit operation.

         discuss environmental
         impacts of alternative
         technologies (e.g.  air
         emissions,  sludge disposal,
         effluent discharge).

     Fourteen complete batches of
waste were processed during the
 sampling  episode,  including eleven
 liquid  and  three solid batches.   Of
 the  eleven  batches of liquid waste,
 three required pretreatment for
 cyanide oxidation, six required
 hexavalent  chromium reduction and
 all  eleven  were treated by chemical
 precipitation  and  vacuum filtration.

 Liquid  Waste Treatment System

 Influent  Wastes.   Discrete wastes
 treated during the sampling episode
 were primarily from fabricated metal
 products  industries.   Each batch
 treated contained  an average of 46
 percent by  volume  electroplating
 waste.  Table  1  summarizes the types
 of waste  streams including their  SIC
 code and  RCRA  waste code.

     These  discrete waste  streams
 have widely varying concentrations
 of metals.  The wastes had high
 concentrations of  solids,  ranging
 from 4,500  to  259,200 ppm.   Ninety
 six  percent of the solids  were
 dissolved.  The pH ranged  from 1  to
 13.  In the three  batches  pretreated
 by cyanide  oxidation,  the  total
 cyanide concentration  in discrete
 wastes averaged 7.6  ppm.   Free
 cyanide was present  at  less  than
 0.10 ppm.

     The most concentrated waste  was
 a chromic acid plating  bath  solution
 with a pH of 1, containing  the
 following metals:  antimony
 (68 ppm),  hexavalent  chromium
 (78,400 ppm), total chromium
 (103,800 ppm),  copper  (3,500 ppm),
 lead (60 ppm),  nickel  (40 ppm) and
 zinc (100 ppm).

Treatment Tank Composite.  As many
as five discrete wastes were
 composited for  batch treatment.
Treatment tank composite samples
were analyzed for volatile organics,
 total organic halide (TOX) and total
organic carbon  (TOO, in addition to
                                      -435-

-------
C/l
Q



8.
Q =:
                                             o
                                             O
                                             w
                                             erf


                                             CO


                                             §
                                             O
                                             CO
                                              O
   -436-

-------
                 TABLE 1.  INDUSTRIAL SOURCES OF LIQUID WASTES
 Industry
 Category
 Industry
 (SIC Code)
Process
RCRA waste
code
Fabricated
metal products

Fabricated
metal products

Fabricated
metal products
Fabricated
metal products

Chemical manu-
facturing and
processing

Fabricated metal
products


Fabricated
metal products
Fabricated
metal products


Fabricated
metal products
Refurbishing of used
field artillery (3471)

Electroplating (3471)
Manufacture of toasters,
toaster ovens, and
coffee makers (3634)

Reclamation of tin
from scrap metal (3341)

Manufacture of glass
perfume bottles (3621)
Manufacture of aluminum
windows, doors, sashes
and mouldings (3442)

Manufacture of semi-
conductors and electrical
connectors (3678, 3643)

Manufacture of
aluminum bottle
caps (3466)

Surface finishing of
sheet steel-anodizing,
painting and etching
(3316)
Chrome & brass       F006
electroplating

Chrome               D002
electroplating

Nickel and chrome    F006
electroplating
Etching,.             D002
electroplating

Etching              D002
Conversion coating   F019
of aluminum
Nickel, chrome       F006
and gold electro-
plating

Cleaning             D002
Cleaning,             K062
D002 - Corrosive waste that has a pH less than or equal to 2 or greater than
       or equal to 12.5.

F006 - Wastewater treatment sludges from electroplating operations except from
       the following processes: (1) sulfuric acid anodizing of aluminum; (2)
       tin plating on carbon steel; (3) zinc plating (segregated basis) on
       carbon steel; (4)  aluminum or zinc - aluminum plating on carbon steel;
       (5) cleaning/stripping associated with tin, zinc and aluminum plating
       on carbon steel; and (6) chemical etching and milling of aluminum.

F019 - Wastewater treatment sludges from the chemical conversion coating of
       aluminum.

K062 - Spent pickle liquor from steel finishing operations.
                                      -437-

-------
toxic metals and other parameters.
Toluene,  1,1-dichloroethane,
ethylbenzene and 1,1,1
trichloroethane were detected in
several treatment  tank composite
samples at levels below 300 ppb.
The pH ranged from 7 to 10.  TOX
varied from 0.00 to 0.36 percent
with a mean of 0.11 percent.  TOO
varied from 0 to 5,900 ppm with a
mean of 1,821 ppm.  Total and free
cyanide were not detected above the
analytical detection limit of 2 ppm.

Waste Treatment Chemicals.  Waste
streams were used as treatment
reagents for cyanide oxidation,
hexavalent chromium reduction and
sulfide precipitation.

     A waste hypochlorite stream is
used as the oxidizing agent in
cyanide treatment.  The waste used
during the sampling episode was a
by-product scrubber solution from
the production of chlorinated
chemicals (RCRA Waste Code D003).
Analytical data showed low
concentrations of barium (43 ppm)
and zinc (4 ppm).  The total solids
content ranged from 250,000 ppm to
330,000 ppm with the majority of
solids being dissolved.  The pH of
the wastestream was 13.

     A waste iron-bearing stream is
used to reduce hexavalent
chromium.  The waste used during the
sampling episode was a waste
pickling acid from the metal
processing industry (RCRA Waste Code
K062).  The following metals were
detected in this waste stream:
arsenic (3 ppm), total chromium
(3500 ppm), copper (532 ppm), nickel
(1553 ppm), and zinc (7 ppm).  The
total solids content ranged from
70,700 ppm to 148,600 ppm with the
majority of solids being
dissolved.  The pH of the
wastestream was 1.
     A waste stream containing
sulfide is used in a polishing step
following precipitation with lime.
In all batches the waste stream was
a by-product scrubber solution from
the production of a sulfurized ester
(RCRA Waste Code D003).
Insignificant concentrations of
total chromium, lead and zinc were
detected in this waste stream.  The
total solids content was 94,000 ppm
with most solids being dissolved.
The pH of the wastestream was 13.

Vacuum Filter Effluent.  Soluble
metals data for the vacuum filter
effluent were consistently below
detection limits.  This indicates
that the precipitation process was
effective in removing soluble
metals.  Total metals data for the
filtrate were comparable to the
soluble metals data, which indicates
insignificant levels of insoluble
metals.  The filtration system was
effective in removing insoluble
metal hydroxides and metal sulfides.

     Metal removal efficiencies by
precipitation and filtration are
summarized in Table 2.  The removal
efficiency for hexavalent chromium
is a result of chromium reduction as
well as precipitation and
filtration.  Metals not listed in
Table 2 were not detected during the
sampling episode.

     In Table 3, data for the vacuum
filter effluent are compared to the
facility's discharge limits.
Analytical detection limits for
mercury and cyanide were higher than
the discharge limits.  The
hexavalent chromium concentration
exceeded the discharge limit three
times for waste treated by chromium
reduction and once for waste treated
only by precipitation and
filtration.  The zinc concentration
exceeded the discharge limit once
during the sampling episode.  All
                                       -438-

-------
                      TABLE 2.  METAL REMOVAL EFFICIENCY
         Metal
                                            Percent Removal Range
         Chromium, Total

         Chromium, Hexavalent

         Copper

         Lead (3 batches only)

         Nickel

         Zinc
                                                99.97 - 100.00

                                                99.98 - 100.00

                                                99.78 - 100.00

                                                99.94- - 100.00

                                                99.90 - 100.00

                                                70.88 -  99.93
      TABLE  3.   COMPARISON  OF  FACILITY DISCHARGE  TO CITY DISCHARGE LIMITS
Pollutant
                             Vacuum Filter Effluent
                                 (ppm, range)
                          Discharge Limit
                              (ppm)
Toxic Metals;
Chromium (total)
Chromium (hexavalent)
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc

Other Parameters:
Cyanide
PH
                                  0.10
                                  0.011
                                  0.07
                                 <0.01
          0.20
          0.190
          0.21
          0.01
                                  0.31  -  0.40
                                 <0.2
                                  0.06 --  1.62
<2
 7
                                        - 10
0.6
0.05
0.8
0.5
0.003
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.15
5.5 - 10.5
NS = Not Sampled
                                      -439-

-------
other parameters listed in Table 3
were detected below the discharge
limits.

     The vacuum filter effluent
samples contained an average solids
content of 5.2 weight percent with
90 percent of the solids being
dissolved.  Volatile organic
compounds were not present above
analytical detection limits.

Vacuum Filter Cake.  The filter cake
samples were dry with a solids
content of 35 weight percent.  All
samples passed the paint filter
test.  The total organic carbon
content averaged 0.57 percent.
Alkalinity was 220,000 mg/1 as
CaCOo.  The filter cake samples were
subject to the EP toxicity and the
recently promulgated Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) test.  Table 4 summarizes the
analytical results and the EPA
treatment standards.  All metals
were found at levels below the
regulatory limits.  Volatile organic
compounds were detected in TCLP
extracts at levels below regulatory
limits.

Solid Waste Treatment System

Influent Wastes.  Discrete solid
wastes treated during the sampling
episode were primarily from
fabricated metal products
industries.  Table 5 summarizes the
types of waste streams, including
their SIC code and RCRA waste
code.  All waste streams were
dewatered residuals from one or more
of the following treatment
processes:  cyanide oxidation,
hexavalent chromium reduction and
lime neutralization.  Discrete
wastes were composited prior to
sampling.

     The untreated solids composite
had a solids content of 41 weight
percent and a total organic carbon
content of 0.48 percent.  All
samples passed the paint filter
test.  Acidity ranged from 0 to
1,400 mg/1 as CaCOo and alkalinity
ranged from 0 to 35,000 mg/1 as
CaCOo.  The metals content was
highly variable.  Total chromium,
lead, nickel and zinc were detected
at levels ranging from 100 ppm to
7,000 ppm.  Barium, cadmium,
hexavalent chromium and copper were
detected at levels below 100 ppm.
Low concentrations of volatile
organic compounds were present.

Stabilized Solids.  Metals results
for stabilized solids are summarized
in Table 6.  All metals were found
at levels below the regulatory
limits in the sample extracts.
Styrene (200 ppb) and total xylenes
(78 ppb) were detected as well as
other volatile organics (<30 ppb).
Volatile organics in TCLP extracts
were detected at levels below the
regulatory limits.  The stabilized
solids had a solids content of 46
weight percent and a total organic
carbon content of 0.57 percent.  All
stabilized solids samples passed the
paint filter test.  Alkalinity
averaged 135,000 mg/1 as CaCOo.

CONCLUSION

     The facility discussed in this
paper was successful in treating
electroplating and other metal
finishing waste.  The cyanide
oxidation operation could not be
evaluated due to high analytical
detection limits.  Metal removal
efficiency was consistently higher
than 99.8 percent except for one
batch where zinc removal was 70.9
percent.  In most cases, the
facility's effluent was acceptable
with respect to discharge limits.
Hexavalent chromium and zinc
exceeded discharge limits at least
once during the sampling episode.
                                      -440-

-------
The filter cake from liquid waste
treatment and stablili2ed solids can
be delisted and disposed of in a
nonhazardous landfill.  Toxic metal
and volatile organic analyses of
TCLP extracts showed compliance with
regulatory limits.  In general, the
facility was well maintained with
proper attention to controlling air
emissions, to monitoring effluent
quality and to producing non-
hazardous solids.
                 TABLE 4.  METALS RESULTS FOR VACUUM FILTER CAKE
Compositional
(ppm)
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (hexavalent)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Le'ad
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
<10
5
40
<2
53
1.77
16,300
775
2,800
<1
4,700
<10
14
<10
2,100
EP Toxiclty
Extract
(mg/1)
0.01
<0.05
0.03
0.01
0.031
<0.005
<0.01
0.03
0.18
<0.002
0.09
<0.01
, 0.06
0.06
0.10
TCLP
Extract
(mg/1)
__
0.016
0.28
—
<0.020
—
<0.05
—
<0.10
< 0.0002
—
<0.040
' <0.020
—
—
TCLP (a)
Regulatory
Limit
(mg/1)
._
5.0
100.0
--
1.0
—
5.0
—
5.0
0.2
—
1.0
5.0
—
—
(a)  Federal Register, Volume,5,1, Number 144, June 13, 1986, p. 21675.
                                      -441-

-------
                 TABLE 5.  INDUSTRIAL SOURCES OF SOLID WASTES
Industry
Category
Metal processing
and refining
Fabricated
metal products
Fabricated
metal products
Metal processing
Industry
(SIC Code)
»
Primary iron and
steel production (3312)
Manufacture of
semiconductors (3674)
Manufacture of
chains (3471)
Primary steel production
Process
Pickling
Etching and nickel
electroplating
Nickel and chrome
electroplating
Pickling, chrome
RCRA waste
RCRA waste
code
DOO?
F006
F006
D007
and refining
Electrical and
electronic
equipment

Fabricated
metal products
Fabricated
metal products
with secondary plating
of sheet steel (3312)

Secondary battery
manufacture (3691)
Manufacture of motor
vehicles and passenger
car bodies (3711)

Manufacture of iron
pipe fittings (3312)
and zinc electro-
plating

Lead-acid battery        D008
production
Conversion coating       F019
of aluminum
Cleaning                 K062
D007 -  A solid waste that exhibits the characteristic of EP toxicity due to
        the concentration of the toxic contaminant chromium.

D008 -  A solid waste that exhibits the characteristics of EP toxicity due to
        the concentration of the toxic contaminant lead.

F006 -  Wastewater treatment sludges from electroplating operations except
        from the following processes: (1) sulfuric acid anodizing of aluminum;
        (2) tin plating on carbon steel; (3) zinc plating (segregated basis)
        on carbon steel; (4) aluminum or zinc - aluminum plating on carbon
        steel; (5) cleaning/stripping associated with tin, zinc and aluminum
        plating or carbon steel; and (6) .chemical etching and milling of
        aluminum.

F019 -  Wastewater treatment sludges from the chemical conversion coating of
        aluminum.

K062 -  Spent pickle liquor from steel finishing operations.
                                      -442-

-------
            TABLE  6.  METALS RESULTS FOR STABILIZED SOLIDS
Toxic Metal
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (hexavalent)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Compositional
(ppm)
30
5
• ,60
<2
21
0.30
7,500
775
.1,500
<1
4,900
<10
8
<10
11,000
EP Toxicity
Extract
(mg/1)
<0.01
<0.05
0.20
<0.01
0.014
<0.005
0.04
0.11
0.14
<0.002
0.22
<0.01
0.01
<0.01
0.04
TCLp(a)
TCLP Regulatory
Extract Limit
(mg/1) (mg/1)
_.
0.015
0.19
—
<0.05
—
0.15
—
<0.10
< 0.0002
—
<0.20
<0.02
—
—
._
5.0
100.0
—
1.0
__
5.0
. • ..
5.0
0.2
—
1.0
5.0
__
—
Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 144, June 13, 1986,  p.  21675.
                                -443-

-------
                             SOLVENT RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES
                                           By

                                   Robert A. Olexsey
                                   Benjamin L. Blaney
                                    Ronald J. Turner
                               Treatment Technology Staff
                               Thermal Destruction Branch
                           Alternative Technologies Division
                    Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                                Cincinnati. Ohio  45268
                                        ABSTRACT

     The increasing cost for disposal of hazardous wastes presents a favorable climate
for recovery of materials and energy from hazardous wastes.  In the case of waste sol-
vents, the land disposal restrictions imposed by EPA on those materials on November 7,
1986, will make disposal much more difficult and costly.

     This paper describes approaches to recovery of solvent wastes:  fuel  blending,
distillation, and steam stripping.  The technologies are described and data are presented
from EPA programs to evaluate these technologies.
INTRODUCTION

    Annual waste solvent generation in the
U.S.  is approximately 3.2 billion gallons
(1).  Prior to the imposition of the cong-
ressionally mandated land disposal re-
strictions on November 7, 1986, about 1.2
billion gallons of hazardous waste sol-
vents were disposed of to the land, pri-
marily to surface impoundments.  About 300
million gallons went to deep well injec-
tion and 195 million gallons were inciner-
ated.  About 545 million gallons were re-
cycled and the remainder went to storage.
Of the amount that was recycled, 80 per-
cent was recycled at the source of gener-
ation (onsite) (2).

     New regulations promulgated by EPA
under the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amend-
ments of 1984 (HSWA) require substantial
treatment of the waste prior to land dis-
posal and also put severe limitations on
waste storage.  HSWA also requires that
EPA evaluate deep well injection to deter-
mine its suitability for long term waste
disposal.  It is obvious that acceptable
management techniques must be found to
accommodate the discrepancy between cur-
rent waste solvent generation rates and
treatment capacity.

     Certain conclusions are obvious.
First, more solvent wastes will  be incin-
erated.  In particular, commercial incin-
eration will increase.  Wastes which are
burned onsite are most likely burned as
fuel in boilers.  Waste that will  tend to
show up at commercial incineration facil-
ities will have low value as fuel.

     Second, waste minimization will get
increased attention as costs increase and
disposal options decrease.  Minimization
practices will  more than likely result in
lower volumes of total solvent waste en-
tering the waste management system but
these solvent wastes will be more  dilute
and of lower quality as a fuel, therefore
making the wastes less amenable to incin-
eration.

     Therefore, there will exist a greater
need for application and improvements of
                                          -444-

-------
concentration techniques.  Once the waste
solvent is concentrated, it will  be a
function of purity, degree of separation,
and fuel value that determines whether the
solvent is reused as a solvent or burned
as a fuel.

Solvent Recovery Technologies

     Solvent recovery technologies consist
of three general types of processes: con-
centration, refinement, and use as fuel.
Examples of concentration processes in-
clude drying, evaporation, steam strip-
ping, and simple distillation.  The most
prominent example of refinement is frac-
tional distillation.  Solvents are burned
as fuel in industrial boilers and indus-
trial furnaces such as cement kilns, lime
kilns, and steel making furnaces.  The
remainder of this paper will provide de-
scriptions of the principal solvent recla-
mation processes, including thin film
evaporation, steam stripping, and frac-
tional distillation.  Data are provided on
the performance of these technologies in
spent solvent processing operations.

Steam Stripping

     Figure 1 illustrates a typical steam
stripping process.  Waste enters near the
top of the column and then flows by grav-
ity countercurrent to steam (3).  As the
waste passes down through the column it
contacts vapors rising from the bottom of
the column that contains progressively
less volatile organic compounds.  The
concentration of volatile compounds in the
waste reaches a minimum at the bottom of
the column where it is discharged.  The
overhead vapor is condensed as it exits
the column and the condensate is then
decanted to achieve solvent/water separa-
tion.  Reflux may or may not be used,
depending on the desired composition of
the overhead stream.

     Steam stripping is most applicable to
low concentrations of organic materials in
water.  Volatile organic concentrations in
excess of 10 percent may be more cost
effectively treated with distillation.
Also, organic compounds with boiling
points in excess of 150°C cannot be
treated effectively with steam stripping.

     Recently, EPA conducted bench scale
steam stripping of a petrochemical process
wastewater stream containing halogenated
organics.  The waste stream contained a
number of constituents found in waste sol-
vents.  Table 1 exhibits data on compound
removal efficiency for the 5.08 cm dia-
meter, 367 cm high, counterflow column.
Recoveries of volatile organics averaged
85 percent with steam flows of 18 to 24
percent of the feed (4).

     The concentrated solvent product from
the steam stripper could be used in an
application where mixed constituents are
acceptable (e.g. certain degreasing oper-
ations).  It could also be processed fur-
ther to separate constituents (through
distillation) or burned as a fuel.

Thin Film Evaporation

     Agitated thin film evaporation (ATFE)
is the most effective high volume evap-
oration technique for separating low and
medium boiling point waste components,
while concentrating high boiling and/or
solid constituents.  Its ability to
handle a wide range of waste viscosities
(1 to 1,000,000 cps) makes it the most
common treatment device at large commer-
cial solvent recycling companies.

     Liquid waste is fed to the top of
ATFEs where longitudinal blades mounted
on a motor driver rotor centrifugally
force the waste against the heat transfer
surface which is the inside wall of the
cylindrical  vessel.  This surface is en-
closed in a heating jacket which employs
steam or hot oil as the heating medium.
Temperatures of the working fluid can
reach 650°F.  The agitation and liquid
film are maintained by the blades as they
move along the heat transfer surface.  The
blade tips typically travel 30 to 40 feet
per second at a clearance of 0.007 to 0.10
inches which creates high turbulence.
This facilitates efficient heat and mass
transfer, shortens required waste resi-
dence time and creates a degree of mixing
which maintains solvents in a manageable
suspension without fouling the heat trans-
fer surface.  Viscosity is the critical
waste property that affects thin film
evaporator performance.

     A schematic of an ATFE and associated
pretreatment and post-treatment options
are shown in Figure 2 (5).  The pretreat-
ment techniques most often undergoing ATFE
are a previous solvent recovery process,
oil or suspended solids removal, or a
                                           -445-

-------
CO
CO

o
o
cc
a
o
Z
a
a
cc
ui
»-
CO


AQUEOUS PHASE)
c
td
U
Cd
Q
^s
X
Cu
Id
as





OS
NON-CONTACT
DOLING WATER


u
-"* 	


§
cd at
2~~ O
cvi












^ d
a

r-) c_i
1- td Z

O H
td O 1
04 H H
W CO
S» Cd O
82 * '
Id 2 04
PS eu o

t


»
0 C3
otf •< cu £
Cd U Pu ^
H H (-" iJ
Z en oi o
3 H cj
ej __

A






«
td f H
< C W ==
S > M H
a f §d
BU (. 	 S S


[RECT STEAM
ADDITION
a



en td
td •<
O M
o-o
•< en
^, n S
52
td en
oi 
-------
POST-TREATM

OPTIONS
                  §
               o£2
               z <
               >-< z tn
               SS*
               H-&3
DEC

DE
-
-
HI
u.
H
<

cc
o
LL
5'5
< 1-1
                                                          WOE-
                                                                           s
                                                                        §3
                                                                        PS
                                                                        W
                                                          ea bi  i-i o- u o cr
                                                             z  ea cn z M >H
                                                          w o  j
                                                          3 Z  O
                                                          fc< M  to
                                                          O  >• >«  '
                                                             oi E o,
                                                          •«  o c- o

                                                             II
                                   O 32 t>
                                   ^ H W
UJ
u
CC
LU
OS
Z3
CD
P z
< O
£jj rt
a- H
6- Cu
WO
M o
H >-H
< H
                          en 
                          Q W
                                   O
   •J Z
o o o
Z en >-•
I-. -^ f-
t- e  -
                                     s
                           .  .  <
                          O  C' C.
                          UJ  i-. LU
                          O  J CO

                          I
                                  t> O
                                  >J bJ
                                  O W
                                  en CL.
                                  CU
                                  co
                                     fl
                                     en
                                        -447-

-------
Post treatment is almost always required.
These operations basically include further
refinement of the overhead produce through
dewatering or fractionation, further sol-
vent recovery, or disposal of bottom
products.

     The USEPA recently evaluated a thin
film evaporator at a recycler which was
using the process for the treatment of
paint and lacquer thinner.  The thinner
contains up to 20 percent dissolved paint
resins plus suspended pigments and non-
halogenated solvents.  The overhead prod-
uct from the ATFE is sold back to the
customers without high boiling components,
such as xylene.  The bottoms product is
sold as a waste fuel.

     Table 2 displays performance data for
the ATFE (6).  The unit has 20 square feet
of heated surface area with a steam heated
jacket.  The blades operate at 300 revolu-
tions per minute (rpm) and the unit oper-
ates under up to 28 in Hg of vacuum.
During the test, the unit processed 1530
gallons of feed material over a 6.75
hour period, generating 830 gallons of
distillate product and  688 gallons of
still bottoms.  Steam pressure was 150
psig and steam temperature was 365°F.
Overhead product temperature was 125°F
and bottom temperature was 140°F.

     Viscosity is the critical waste
property that affects thin film evaporator
performance.  ATFEs can operate in the
range of from 1 to 1,000,000 cps.

Fractional Distillation
     Distillation is a separation tech-
nique that operates on the principle of
differential volatility.  More volatile
constituents can be enriched or separated
from less volatile constituents by heat-
ing.  Distillation can be simple, in
which the objective is to concentrate a
volatile component, or it can be frac-
tional, in which the goal is to separate
two or more volatile components.

     Fractionation is a multi-stage proc-
ess used for separating solvent mixtures
when the value of the pure component pro-
duct justifies the additional processing.
As with simple distillation, indirect heat
from steam or oil provides the thermal
driving force.  While simple distillation
most often occurs in a pot or kettle,
fractionation takes place in a column.
Figure 3 is an illustration of a continu-
ous process.  In this operation feed is
constantly charged to the column at  a
point which provides the specified top  and
bottoms product.  The section of the tower
above the feed point is the rectifying  or
enriching section and the section below
the feed point is the stripping section.
A reboiler is connected to the bottom
of the fractionation tower to provide the
heat needed for additional reflux (conden-
sate recycle) and better fractionation  of
complex mixture (6).

     EPA recently conducted a field test
of a full scale batch distillation unit
that was used to process a liquid feed
containing three major components:
methanol, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), and
methylene chloride.  The water content  of
the feed was 3.59 percent.  The atmos-
pheric distillation unit was equipped
with a 6 foot high, 10 inch diameter
packed column and had a batch capacity
of 500 gallons.

     Table 3 provides data on the perform-
ance of the fractionation unit on the
three principal constituents.  The data
in Table 3 shows that the lowest boiling
component (methylene chloride) boiled off
early, appearing at highest concentrations
in the first product cut and decreasing
concentrations in subsequent cuts.
Methanol concentration in the products  was
relatively constant.  The least volatile
of the three major components (MEK)  was
present in low concentration in the first
two cuts and increased in concentration as
distillation continued.  From Table 3 it
can be seen that distillation provides  ex-
cellent separation for the low boiling
point compounds.  Further refinement could
be achieved through additional product
cuts (higher column) or through further
distillation of the individual product
cuts (7).

Waste Solvent End Use

     Waste solvents can be either reused
as solvents or burned as fuel.  Histori-
cally, the extent of solvent recovery has
been dictated by equipment processing
capability and local marketing situation.
However, regulatory constraints imposed on
the bottoms product will  increasingly be-
come the decisive factor in routing sol-
vents to recovery through treatment.
                                          -448-

-------
                  VAPOH
                                 *- STCAU
                                   CONOCHSAIf
                        BOTTOUS PRODUCT
FIGURE  3.CONTINUOUS   FRACTIONATION
                       -449-

-------
              TABLE 1.  REMOVAL EFFICIENCY DATA FOR STEAM STRIPPER
                               Feed Composition
                                   (mg/L)
                                     Average Removal
                                   Efficiency (Percent)
1,2-Dichloroethylene
Ethyl ene Di chloride
Dichloromethane
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Chloroform
1583.3
1593.0
800.9
572.8
140.3
85.9
91.3
76.7
99.9
89.9
                 TABLE 2.  PERFORMANCE OF THIN FILM EVAPORATION
                             (Al1 values in mg/kg)
Constituent
 Waste Feed
    Still  Bottoms
                                                            Distillate Product
Xylene
Acetone
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl Benzene
Methyl Isobutyl
  Ketone
n-Butyl Alcohol
Toluene
Methyl Ethyl
  Ketone
Isopropanol
   66,000
  190,000
   11,000
   22,000

   14,000
   11,000
  220,000

  180,000
   76,000
      210,000
        5,200
       12,000
       48,000

        5,600
        5,500
       81,000

       57,000
        5,500
       84,000
      180,000
       12,000
       28,000

       16,000
       13,000
      240,000

      220,000
       84,000
                 TABLE 3.  FRACTIONAL DISTILLATION  PERFORMANCE
Compound
 Boiling
Point (°C)
                                                Concent rat i on in g/1
                                                —StTTl
                           Product Cuts
Influent    Bottoms
                                                                   2
              3
Methanol                64.5
Methylene Chloride      40.0
Methyl Ethyl Ketone     79.6
                  300
                  460
                  240
              230
              <0.5
              370
 160
1100
  42
190
710
 65
180   190
590    58
280   340
                                       -450-

-------
      Whether the end use is for solvents
 or for fuel, the treatment concentration
 requirements are identical.  The decision
 to further concentrate and/or fractionate
 will  be a function of the relative value
 of-the recovered solvent versus the in-
 creased cost of treatment for recovery.

      In any case, solvent bottoms  will
 find  increasing use as fuels.  In  1984,
 at least 62 percent of solvent bottoms
 from  commercial recovery facilities were
 used  as supplemental fuel.

 Commercial  Facilities
      The  commercial  solvent  recycling  in-
 dustry currently  consists  of at  least  135
 firms with  243  facilities  in the U.S.
 Large firms tend  to  serve  regional  markets
 and  are capable of producing high-purity
 solvents  through  the use of  distillation,
 fractionation,  and other specialized re-
 covery techniques.   The list below  de-
 scribes solvent recovery technology utili-
 zation in the commercial solvent recycling
 industry  (3):
 Process

 Simple distillation
 Fractionation
 Thin-film evaporation
 Steam stripping
 Drying
 Solvent extraction
 Use as fuel
No.  of Facilities

      44
      22
      43
      18
      17
       6
      48
     Of course, many facilities use combi-
nations of equipment in series to produce
a finished product.  With the imposition
of the land disposal restrictions and the
possible constraints to be imposed on deep
well injection, both the number of facil-
ities and the adoption of advanced tech-
nologies should increase.

Conclusion
     Solvent recovery is an important
waste management practice today.  A
greater percentage of solvents are re-
 covered today than any other hazardous
 waste  streams.   The degree  of purity  and
 selection of end use are not limited  by
 technology but  are a function of relative
 costs  of treatment versus product  or  fuel
 value.   Treatment and disposal  costs  will
 rise as land disposal  alternatives are
 eliminated.   Therefore,  more solvent  re-
 covery  will  be  practical  in  the  future.'

 References

 1.   40 CRF  Parts 260-271,  Hazardous
     Waste Management System,  Land Dis-
     posal Restrictions,  Proposed  Rule,
     January 14,  1986.

 2.   Engineering  Science, "Supplemental
     .Report  on the  Technical  Assessment
     of Treatment Alternatives for Waste
     Solvents,"  Report to USEPA, 1985.

 3.   Breton, M.,  et  a!., "Technical
     Resource Document:  Treatment Tech-
     nologies for  Solvent Containing
     Wastes," Report  to USEPA, HWERL,
     August  1986.

 4.   Coco, J. H., et  al., "Development  of
     Treatment and Control Technology for
     Refractory Petrochemical Wastes,"
     Report to USEPA by Gulf South
     Research Institute, EPA-600/2-79-080,
     April 1979.

 5.   Koppenberger, P. F., et al., "Thin-
     Film Technologies Environmental
     Protection," Chemical Age of India,
     V. 36 (1), January 1985.

 6.   Allen, C. C., et al., "Field Eval-
     uation of Hazardous Waste Pretreat-
     ment as an Air Pollution Control
     Technique," Report to USEPA, HWERL,
     by Research Triangle Institute,  EPA
     600/2-86/048, January 1986.

7.   Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., Facility
     Report Test Report for  Environmental
     Waste Enterprises,"  Report to  USEPA,
     HWERL, February 1986.
                                          -451-

-------
                    EVALUATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING PROCESSES
                          IN THE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD INDUSTRY
                                     Thomas J.  Nunno
                                     Stephen Palmer
                                      Mark Arienti

                            Alliance Technologies Corporation
                                   Bedford, MA  01730
                                        ABSTRACT
     In response to the 1984 RCRA Amendments,  EPA1s Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory (HWERL) initiated a program to develop case studies demonstrating waste
minimization and recycling options for hazardous waste management.  The program focused
on solvent and metal waste streams from the semiconductor and printed circuit board
industries, specifically:  1) waste solvents from resist stripping and developing
operations; and 2) metal wastes from plating operations.  Two case studies involved the
use of solvent distillation units which achieved over 95 percent recovery of spent
halogenated solvents.  The results suggest that solvent recovery can be widely applied
to printed circuit board manufacturing facilities.  The other four case studies focused
on technologies to reduce metal-plating wastes.  Two of these, evaluating the use of
sodium borohydride reduction as a substitute for lime/ferrous sulfate precipitation,
found that the technology was a viable substitute in one case and was marginally
acceptable in another.  Another case study, involving carbon adsorption removal of
organic contaminants from plating bath wastes, found that this technology significantly
reduced both disposal costs and waste volume.   A final case study of electrolytic
recovery indicated that while acid copper electroplating rinses are amenable to
electrolytic recovery, other metal-bearing rinses, such as those from solder (tin/lead)
plating or etching are less appropriate.
BACKGROUND

     With the enactment of the Hazardous
and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) in
November 1984, Congress set forth a
schedule for evaluating the land disposal
restriction of various classes of hazardous
wastes including:  (I) solvents; (2) metals
and cyanides; (3) halogenated organics;
(4) corrosives; and (5) dioxin wastes.  A
key issue identified in the evaluation of
the waste bans is the availability of
commercial treatment capacity to handle
the wastes proposed for banning.
Therefore,Congress also asked EPA to
evaluate the potential for onsite waste
minimization to reduce the quantity or
toxicity of wastes being considered under
the ban.
     In an effort to identify successful
waste minimization technologies, EPA's
Office of Solid Waste (OSW) and Office of
Research and Development (ORD) Hazardous
Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
(HWERL) set forth on research efforts
aimed at assessing the viability of waste
minimization as a means of reducing the
quantities of land disposed hazardous
waste.  OSW's research focused on an
exhaustive literature review identifying a
broad spectrum of waste minimization
technologies and their various
applications. The primary emphasis of
HWERL's work was on demonstrating the
effectiveness of specific minimization
technologies through case studies and
process sampling.
                                            -452-

-------
INTRODUCTION

     The  purpose of this  project was to
evaluate  the effectiveness  of various
waste minimization practices  or
technologies in the printed circuit board
and semiconductor manufacturing industries.
The most  significant waste  streams in
these industries are waste  halogenated
solvents  from photoresist stripping and
developing operations  (RCRA Haste Code
F001-F003),  and metal-bearing sludges
(RCRA Waste Code F006)  from the treatment
of metal  plating and etching  rinsewaters.
This paper presents the findings of case
studies conducted at five printed circuit
board manufacturing facilities and one
commercial .treatment/recovery facility.
Each facility investigated  employs some
practice  that requires  offsite disposal.
Two of the case studies focus on the
recovery  of spent halogenated solvents,
and the remaining four  discuss the recovery
or reduction of metal plating and etching
process wastes.  Table  1  summarizes
characteristics of facilities investigated
which range from small  job  shops to large
integrated facilities.

     The  common objectives  of each of the
technologies evaluated  are:
(1) minimization of metals  sludges
generated;  (2) compliance with effluent
guidelines or local discharge limitations;
and (3) reduction in operating costs over
              other conventional  alternatives.  The
              following discussion briefly summarizes
              each case study,  the nature of the
              minimization technology,  the measurements
              data collected and  the results obtained.

              METAL PLATING BATH'WASTE  MINIMIZATION  CASE
              STUDY RESULTS

                   Metal plating  wastes'generated  from
              plating bath dumps,  rinses, etching
              machines and scrubbing operations generate
              copper-, nickel-, tin-, and lead-
              contaminated wastes.   Four of the six  case
              studies investigated under this research
              project focus on  the minimization of
              sludges generated primarily by copper
              plating and etchant baths and copper and
              tin/lead rinsewaters.

              Facility A Case Study

              Description--
                   Facility A is  an offsite Treatment,
              Storage, and Disposal (TSDF) facility
              which processes concentrated dumps from
              the metal plating and printed circuit
              board industries, including alkaline
              etchants, acid plating baths, nitric acid
              rack strip baths, and electroless plating
              cyanide baths.  The average total metals
              concentration in  the incoming waste was
              reportedly 12 g/L (12,000 ppm). Initially,
              the facility was  designed to operate using
              lime and ferrous  sulfate  precipitation of
   TABLE  1.   SUMMARY OF FACILITIES TESTED UNDER WASTE MINIMIZATION CASE STUDY PROGRAM
    Fac i1ity name
                 Description
                                    Wastes treated/reduced
                                                             Technology
    Facility A   Treatment storage disposal
             facility handling electro-
             plating baths, waste
             etchante, spills., etc.
             Capacity: 1}000 gph
             (24,000 gpd).

    Facility B   Contract PC board
             manufacturing shop
             Employees: 77
             Production: 500,000 ft2/yr
             Sales: $7 MiLlion/yr
Nickel plating baths
Copper plating baths
Cyanide
Cupric chloride etchant
Electroless plating rinses
Electroplating rinses
Sodium hydroxide precipitat ioi
Sodium borohydride reduction
Alkaline chlbrihation
Sodium borohydride reduction
Memtek ultrafiltration system
Sludge product
                      Sludge product
Facility C


Facility D





Facility E




Facility F


Computer manufacturer.
Employees: 10,000

Electronic equipment rafgr.
PC board manufacturing using
the subtractive technique in
the HacDermid process.
' Employees : 260

Computer manufacturer.
PC board manufacturing using
additive techniques.
Employees: 600
Production: 600,000 ft2/yr
PC Board manufacturer.
2-sided single layer circuit
' boards.
Production: 480,000 ft^/yr
- Methyl chloroform resist
developer
- Freon resist developer


~ 1, 1, 1-trichloroethane
resist developer
— If 1, 1-trichloroethane
still bottoms
- Acid copper plating bath




- Acid copper plating
rinsewaters
- Tin/lead plating
rinsewaters
- Solvent distillation/
fractionatlon recovery of
resist developers.
- 2-stage solvent distillation

- (1) DuPont RISTOH SRS-120
solvent recovery still
- (2) Recyclene Products, Inc.
RX-35 still
- Activated carbon regeneration
of spent plating baths.



- Agtnct Equipment Corp.
- electrolytic recovery units.



Still bottoms



Still bottoms




Spent activate'
carbon


Metal foil


                                              -453-

-------
metals as the primary means of waste
treatment.  When the high cost of land
disposal of the lime sludges was
considered, alternate means of treating
and disposing of the waste were evaluated.

     The unit processes selected to
detoxify the wastes and recover metals at
Plant A currently include sodium
hypochlorite oxidation of cyanides
(alkaline chlorination), sodium hydroxide
precipitation, pH adjustment, sodium
borohydride reduction (with sodium
tnetabisulfite stabilization),
sedimentation, plate and frame filter
press (for sludge dewatering), rapid sand
filtration, and ion exchange columns for
effluent polishing.

Results—
     The primary purpose of the Facility A
case study was to evaluate sodium
borohydride as a viable waste treatment
alternative for reducing RCRA Hazardous
Waste Code F006 spent electroplating
baths.  The evaluation criteria were the
ability of sodium borohydride (SBH) to
effectively meet local compliance
standards and produce a high density,
low-volume sludge.  The test program
evaluation relies mainly on the trace
metals results to evaluate system
performance.

     The SBH reactor was sampled for eight
selected metals on  the influent, effluent,
and sludge streams.  Analytical results
demonstrated individual metal reduction
efficiencies which  ranged  from  16.1 to
99.8 percent.  The  observed range, in
efficiency data was attributed  to
variations in concentration and chemical
potential  (quantity of free energy
required  for an ionic species to obtain
equilibrium) of each of the metallic ions
contained  in the solution.  Overall, SBH
was able to reduce  6.91 kg of the initial
influent metals loading of 7.25 kg.  These
results represent a greater than
95 percent reduction in total metals for  a
complex waste stream.  The remainder of
the metals influent loading (0.337 kg)
consisted  of over 70 percent calcium.

     An additional  objective of this
program was to evaluate the ability of
Facility A to consistently meet local
pretreatment requirements.  The resultant
data for  two separate batch runs showed
discharges in excess of effluent limits,
apparently due to incomplete polishing
caused by cation exchange column
breakthrough.  Since the test program was
completed, Facility A has instituted the
use of a. quality control holding tank and
further waste processing optimization to
remedy these problems.  Follow-up
discussions with the local sewer authority
revealed that Facility A's effluent
quality has improved considerably and is
now consistently meeting compliance
guidelines.

     In addition to assessing wastewater
effluent characteristics, the testing
program was designed to evaluate
uncontrolled process air emissions.  The
results were obtained by Draeger tube
analysis of grab and integrated samples of
exhaust gases taken from the process
reactor exhaust ducts.  The emission
results showed a frequent presence of
hydrochloric acid and hydrogen gas
accompanied by occasional presence of
ammonia and sulfur dioxide.  One of the
hydrogen emissions grab sample results
(6.0 percent) is significant since this
value is greater than the lower flammable
limit for hydrogen (4.0 percent).  Grab
sample concentrations for ammonia and
sulfur dioxide also exceeded adopted
short-term exposure limits (STEL) for
these substances.

     Due to SBH sludge filter press
operational difficulties, realistic data
as to SBH's ability to produce a high
density, low volume sludge was
unobtainable.  However, EP toxicity
analyses of the sludge produced indicated
that for Facility A influent metals
concentrations, the SBH sludge produced is
fairly stable in that its leachate
characteristics are below EP Toxicity
limits for all metals.  However, note that
the waste is still classified as F006
hazardous waste.

     An additional objective of the
Facility A case study was to evaluate the
ability of sodium borohydride to
economically reduce F006 waste streams.
At the time of testing, Facility A
reduction chemistry was very inefficient
at $19.8/lb of copper reduced.  However,
through process optimization, chemical
costs have reportedly decreased over
63 percent,! bringing process economics
within acceptable limits.  The case study
follow-up for Facility A has indicated
                                             -454-

-------
 that the cost of copper reduction has been
 lowered to $7.27/lb of copper. '  •

 Facility B Case Study

 Description--
      Facility B is a captive printed
 circuit board manufacturing facility.
 Production at Facility B uses a special
 hybrid process, employing elements of both
 additive arid semi-additive printed circuit
 production techniques.  Facility  B uses a
 slow acting etchant {sodium chloride,
 sodium chlorate,  and muriatic acid) which
 etches copper from the board, and yields
 cupric chloride in the waste stream.

      Facility B uses a unique end-of-pipe
 treatment  system employing sodium
 borohydride treatment and ultrafiltration
 (Memtek)  technology for solids
 separation.   In this process, incoming
 plating and etching wastes are adjusted to
 pH 7-11 by addition of sodium hydroxide or
 sulfuric acid.   Sodium borohydride is
 added to obtain an oxidation reduction
 potential  (ORP)  of approximately  -250 mv
 or less.   The reacted waste then  feeds
 from the concentration tank to a  Memtek
 ultrafiltration unit from which the
 permeate is  discharged to municipal
 treatment,  and  the concentrate is returned
 to the  concentration tank.   A small plate
 and  frame  sludge  filter press dewaters the
 sludge  which  is drawn from the bottom of
 the  concentration tank.

      Points of  interest  in  evaluating the
 Facility B waste  treatment  system for this
 case  study were:   (1)  compliance  of the
 ultrafiltration permeate  (wastewater
 discharge) with local  and Federal
 discharge  standards;  (2)  the  volume and  EP
 toxicity of the sludge  filter cake; arid
 (3) economic, evaluation against comparable
 technology Clime and  ferrous  sulfate
 treatment).

Results—
     Analysis of the influent and effluent
streams metals characteristics, showed
that copper was reduced most efficiently
(99.82 percent), while nickel reduction
was the least efficient at (45.5 percent).
Differences in removal efficiencies were
attributed to variations in concentration
(higher removals for higher
concentrations), but the chemical
potential may also have been a factor.
 Approximately 144.7 Ibs of combined metals
 were reduced to elemental.form by the SBH
 reaction system, representing a combined
 reaction efficiency of 99.8 percent.
 Despite deviations from design operating
 conditions, the SBH/ultrafiltration "system
 performed very well.  EP Toxicity leachate
 test results for Facility B filter press   ,
 sludge clearly sbbw\that the sodium
 borohydride sludge produced is fairly
 stable with leachate characteristics below
 EP Toxicity limits for all metals.

      An economic comparison pf the  use of
 sodium borohydride versus lime-ferrous
 sulfate chemistries was conducted.   The
 results demonstrate that in this,
 application,  sodium borohydride w^uld be
 superior to lime-ferrous sulfate for the
 following reasons:   (1) sludge disposal  '
 costs and volumes would be reduced  by
 93.5 percent;  (2) overall operating
 expenses would  be 48 percent lower;  and
 (3)  sludge  generated by the SBH reduction
 process was 78  percent copper and suitable
 for  reclamation  (due to the high copper  "
 content).   Note  that the use of the  sodium
 borohydride and  ultrafiltration treatment
 at Facility B is  favored by  the use  of the
 sodium  chloride  etch process in lieu of
 the  more commonly preferred  ammonium
 chloride etch process.   The  ammonium-based
 etchants create  borohydride  sludge
 reduction problems  which  require tighter-
 treatment process control  and  the use  of
 primary  reductants  such as  sodium
 metabisulfite.  Additional  factors which
 favor the economics  of  sodium  borohydride
 treatment at Facility B include:  1) high
 copper  concentrations and  low  organic
 loadings; and 2) low effluent  limitations'
 required  by the sanitation district.

 Facility E Case Study

 Description—                          •   '
     In Facility E plating operations,
 addition agent and photoresist breakdown
 products incrementally  accumulate and
 contaminate electrolytic (charge carrying)
 plating baths.  In the  absence of a bath
 regeneration system, Facility E would"
 typically be forced to either discharge'
 the spent plating bath to the wastewater
 treatment plant or send it offsite for
disposal.  In either case, large quantities
of metals containing sludge (RCRA Waste
Code  F006) would be .generated and
subsequently land disposed.  instead,
                                           -455-

-------

-------
 the performance of  these units,  samples of
 the plating  bath, dragput, and rinse bath
 were  analyzed.

      The  following  conclusions were drawn
 based on  the resultant data.  Recovery
 rate  of copper from the acid copper
 solution  was approximately 4 to  5 grams/
 hour/unit, representing an efficiency of
 nearly 90 percent.  The investigators also
 noted that concentrations of tin and lead
 in the dragout were not significantly less
 than  those in the plating bath indicating
 a poor level of recovery.  Thus, use of
 in-line electrolytic recovery was not able
 to reduce metal concentrations sufficiently
 to enable this facility to meet
 pretreatment standards.

      Electrolytic recovery would
 significantly reduce the amount  of sludge  •
 generated if a lime precipitation system
 were  utilized to remove metals from the
 final plant  effluent.  For this  facility,
 a reduction  and subsequent waste
 minimization of 32  tons'/year would be
 realized.  At a sludge disposal cost of
 $200/ton, the annual cost of electrolytic
 recovery  would exceed the savings.
 However,  if  sludge  disposal costs
 increased to $300/ton, fch6 savings (at
 least for copper recovery) would exceed
 the processing costs.

 RESIST DEVELOPING SOLVENT RECOVERY CASE
 STUDIES

      Two  case studies evaluated under this
 program focused upon the minimization of
 developer solvent wastes and sludges which
 might require either land disposal or
 incineration.  In the case of Facility C,
 the technology involves the separation of
 a two-solvent system with subsequent
 recovery  and reuse  of each solvent.  In
 the case  of  Facility D, the technology
 evaluated further recovers the solvent
 bottoms product of  the initial recovery
 unit.

 Facility  C Case Study

 Description—
     The  spent solvents from photoresist
 stripping and developing are contaminated
 with photoresist solids at up to 1 percent,
 and the solvents used for surface cleaning
 are contaminated by dust, dirt or grease.
Waste solvents are  recovered at Plant C by
distillation or evaporation and returned
to the process in which they were used.
Several types of equipment are used
including flash evaporators to recover
methyl chloroform, and a distillation
column to recover Freon.

     There are two identical flash
evaporators at the facility, each with a
capacity to recover 600 gallons of methyl
chloroform (MCF) per hour.  The flash
chamber operates at a vacuum of 20 in. Hg,
allowing the MCF to vaporize at 100 to
110°F.  The units are operated one to
two shifts/day -depending on the quantity
of waste solvent being generated.

     A packed distillation column is used
to recover pure Freon from a waste solvent
stream containing approximately 90 percent
freon and 10 percent methyl chloroform.
Waste is continuously fed to a reboiler
where it is vaporized and rises up the
packed column.  Vaporized freon passes
through the column, is condensed and
recovered at a rate of 33 gal/hour.  MCF
condenses on the packing and falls back
into the reboiler.  The distillation
bottoms are removed when the concentration
of methyl chloroform reaches 80 percent
(approximately i to 2 weeks).

Results—
     Sampling and analysis was conducted
on process streams associated with the
solvent recovery processes.  One of these
processes was the flash evaporator used
for recovery of methyl chloroform
(1,1,1-trichloroethane), and the other was
the distillation column used to recover
Freon from a Freon/methyl chloroform
mixture.  The conclusions drawn from the
sampling and testing program were: 1) at
least 95 percent of the solids are removed
from the solvent waste influent; 2) the
recovered product is at least as clean as
the virgin material; and 3) the still
bottoms from recovery of contaminated
solvent still contain a high fraction
(90 percent) of solvent.

     In recovering spent solvent, the
company saves over $10 million annually,
compared to offsite recovery.  The savings
per pound of methyl chloroform, methylene
chloride, and Freon recovered is $0.18,
$0.18, and $0.61, respectively.  The high
cost savings are primarily due to the fact
that the solvents recovered are reused
                                           -457-

-------
onsite, thus reducing the quantity (by
greater than 95 percent) of new or virgin
solvent that must be purchased.  Because
the rate of generation of spent solvent is
so high, the initial expense of purchasing
recovery equipment is quickly returned.

     Incentives other than economic
reasons for onsite recovery include:
1} reduction in the risk of a spill of
solvent in transporting the waste to a
TSDF; and 2) reduced liability related to
an accident at the XSDF resulting in the
release of spent solvent.

Facility D Case Study

Description—
     Printed circuit boards are produced
at Facility D using the subtractive
technique and solvent-based photoresists.
Methylene chloride resist stripper and
1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCE) developer are
continuously recycled in closed-loop
stills.  The TCE developer wastes (Haste
Code F002) are recovered in a DuPont
Riston SRS-120 solvent recovery still
(referred to as the primary still) and
returned to the developer line.  Until
recently, all still bottoms from the
primary still were drummed and shipped
offsite for reclamation at a solvent
recycling facility.  Facility D purchased
a Recyclene Industries RX-35 solvent
recovery system (referred to as the
secondary still) in October 1985, to
recover additional TCE from the SRS-120
still bottoms.

     The Recyclene Industries RX-35 solvent
recovery system is a batch distillation
system with a 30 gallon capacity, silicone
oil immersion heated stainless steel
boiler, a noncontact, water-cooled
condenser, and a 10 gallon temporary
storage tank.  The boiler is equipped with
a vinyl liner inside a Teflon bag.  The
Teflon bag provides temperature resistance
and the vinyl bag collects solid residue,
eliminating boiler clean-out and minimizing
sludge generation after distillation.  Two
thermostats control the temperature of the
boiler and the vapor, automatically
shutting down the boiler when all the
solvent has evaporated.  The maximum
operating temperature of the still is
370°F, so recovery of solvents with higher
boiling points would not be practical.
Recovery of a 20 to 25 gallon batch of
Still bottoms requires approximately
90 minutes at Facility D, and four to six
batches are completed each day.

Results—
     Evaluation of the system consisted of
the analysis of the contaminated feed,
overhead product, and distillation bottoms.
Based on a mass balance and analytical
data, the following conclusions were made:
1) purity of recovered solvent was
99.99 percent; 2) total solvent recovery
was 99.78 percent; 3) Still bottoms
contained 7.5 weight percent
1,1,1-trichloroethane; and 4) reduction in
waste generation was 97.5 percent..

     Annual cost savings ($43,000) and
waste reduction (10,602 gal) were
calculated for Plant D, based on the first
year of RX-35 operation.  In addition, the
investment payback period for the RX-35
was calculated considering credit for
reclaimed solvent and reductions in waste
transportation and disposal costs.  The
estimated payback period was 7.3 months,
given the current level of solvent
reclamation.  Thus, the low capital cost
of the unit and the relatively high costs
of virgin solvent ($4.50/gal) favor the
second-stage recovery of TCE developer
still bottoms.

     Potential drawbacks to the
implementation for a RX-35 back still
include 1) while this technology
significantly reduces the volume and
toxicity of the solvent still bottoms, it
continues to generate a hazardous waste
product, 2) there is a large potential for
the accumulation of contaminants and/or
breakdown products.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

     The findings of the waste minimization
case studies evaluated under this program
are presented in Table 2, which includes
data collected by the facilities and
verified by sampling and laboratory
results.  These results indicate that a
good variety of technologies exist to
minimize metals-containing and solvent
wastes produced by the printed circuit
board and semiconductor industries.  The
technologies discussed range from simple
changes in treatment system reagents with
nominal capital costs to large onsite
solvent reclamation facilities with
significantly higher capital costs.
                                           -458-

-------
          TABLE 2.  SUMMARY OF FINDINGS OF WASTE REDUCTION/RECYCLING CASE STUDIES

Facility
name
Facility A
Facility B
Facility C



Technology
Sodium borohydride reduction
Sodium borohydride reduction
Solvent batch distillation



Waste reduction
Metals sludge
Metals sludge
Methylene chloride
Methyl chloroform
Freon

Annual waste
reduction
achieved
	 a
962 tons
6,152,000 gal



Capital costs
(J)
Nominal
Nominal
709, AGO

'•
Projected
annual cost
savings
(4)
__b
115,870
16,000,000


Facility D  2-Stage solvent distillation 1 , 1, 1-Trichloroethane
                             Resist developer
                             still bottoms
                                                         10,625 gal
                                                                   26,150
          "Not quantifiable, but a significant waste reduction was realized.

          ^Not demonstrated during testing.

          c( ) indicates negative value.
                                                                             43,105
Facility E
Facility F
Carbon adsorption
plating bath reclamation
Agraet electrolytic
recovery unit
Platini
(metal!
Metals
; bath wastes
! sludge)
sludge
10,600 gal
32 tons
9,200
30,350
57,267
(10,685)c
      Four of the case studies  investigated
 under this program focused on  technologies
 to reduce metal-plating rinsewater  sludges.
 The use of sodium borohydride  as  a
 substitute for lime/ferrous sulfate was
 found to be viable in one case and  •
 appeared to be marginally acceptable  in
 another.   The case study on carbon
 adsorption recovery of plating bath wastes
 found that this technology significantly
 reduced both disposal costs and waste
 volume.   The case study of electrolytic
 recovery indicated that this technology is
 highly waste stream specific.  An acid
 copper electroplating rinse is an ideal
 waste stream for electrolytic  recovery.
 However,  other metal-bearing rinses, such
 as  those  from solder (tin/lead) plating or
 etching,  are not appropriate for use of
 electrolytic recovery.   Electrolytic
 recovery  units are,  however,  generally
 inexpensive  to purchase and can be used in
many  cases  to supplement an end-of-pipe
 treatment process.

      Two  of  the case  studies  presented in
this  paper  involve the  recovery of spent
halogenated  solvents  using solvent
distillation units.   Both  of  these case
studies indicate  that onsite  solvent
recovery  is  successful -from a technical
and an economic  standpoint.   In both
                                       cases, over 95 percent of  the  waste
                                       solvent was recovered and  reused onsite.
                                       Splvent recovery appears to be a technology
                                       that could be applied to a number of
                                       printed circuit board manufacturing
                                       facilities.

                                            The results of this project  indicate
                                       that waste reduction can be achieved
                                       through the use of appropriate  technology,
                                       and  it^can be achieved with significant
                                       reductions in cost.  The case studies also
                                       indicate that the success of waste
                                       reduction is  in many cases waste stream
                                       specific.   The technologies will not
                                       necessarily be successful in all cases.  A
                                       slight variation between one waste stream
                                       and  another may make waste reduction
                                       either technically  or economically
                                       impractical.   Therefore,  successful waste
                                       reduction  is dependent on a thorough
                                      knowledge  of waste  quantities  and
                                      characteristics.

                                      REFERENCES

                                      1.   Rosenbaum, W.,  ETTCAM-RI  Inc.
                                           Warwick, R.I.   Personal communication
                                           with Thomas J.  Nunno,  Alliance
                                           Technologies Corporation,
                                           December 12, 1985.
                                            -459-

-------
     THE CALIFORNIA INNOVATIVE ALTERNATIVE  TREATMENT AND
           RECYCLING DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS  PROGRAM

             Jan Radimsky,  P.E. and Robert Ludwig
           California Department of Health Services
                     Sacramento, CA 95814
                           ABSTRACT
  .



Alternative waste management strategies being studied include, in
order of preference, (1) source reduction, (2) recycling, and
(3) treatment.

     This paper discusses state and federal statutory requirements and
problems encountered in the process of implementation of th e ^ents
of California's Waste Reduction Program.  Specific studies described
incSSe  (1? waste stream -information collection,  (2) assessment of
eSSSt of use of waste treatment in California,   (3) waste audit
SSgSams, *4? waste management information transfer, and  (5) discus-
sion of preliminary results from demonstration projects.
INTRODUCTION

      The California Department of
Health Services'  Waste Reduction
Program was initiated in July,
1984.  The program has been devel-
oped with input from environmental
groups and industry. In addition,
the Department has reviewed the
efforts of waste reduction programs
from six states and incorporated
their regulations which were appli-
 cable to California.  The various
program elements are designed to
 overcome different technical and
 financial barriers, to help facili-
 tate permitting, and to meet regu-
 latory requirements.  These key
 elements include  (1) technical
 assistance,  (2) information and
 technology transfer,  (3) economic
 incentives, and  (4) regulatory
 incentives.
     The major waste reduction
strategies of the California Waste
Reduction Program that industry can
apply to reduce the volume of un-
treated hazardous wastes going to
land disposal in order of prefer-
ence are: (1) Source reduction—the
elimination or reduction of the
generation of hazardous wastes; (2)
Recycling and reuse—reprocessing
of a waste material to a point that
it can be used again for the origi-
nal or different purposes;  (3)
Treatment—including incineration
to eliminate or reduce the hazar-
dous characteristics of wastes; and
 (4) Limit land disposal to treated
wastes residues only.

     Source  reduction is the best
 solution as  it eliminates the
                                    -450-

-------
 problems associated with hazardous
 waste generation, storage, trans-
 portation, treatment, and residual
 disposal.  This strategy reduces
 significantly the volume of hazar-
 dous wastes and can usually be
 accomplished by improvements in the
 manufacturing process, waste stream
 segregation, and handling.  Its
 implementation beyond a certain
 point may require major technolog-
 ical changes and may become too
 costly to implement.  Also, treat-
 ment and disposal of the reduced
 volume of the waste will still be
 required.

      Recycling feasibility for
 different wastes is affected by
 costs of raw materials,  cost of
 disposal alternatives,  and specific
 process demands.   The availability
 of  low-cost raw materials in com-
 parison with the cost of recycled
 wastes may limit this option.

      Treatment has the potential  to
 detoxify most wastes although it
 may shift the public health and
 environmental risks from land to
 air,  ground and surface  waters.
 Treatment usually results in a
 residue less toxic than  the
 original wastes which can then be
 disposed in a non-hazardous waste  '
 landfill.   However,  there are some
 instances where a smaller volume  of
 highly concentrated waste is pro-
 duced which will  require disposal
 in  a  hazardous waste landfill.

      A major part of the waste
 reduction program has involved the
 EPA in a  Cooperative Agreement with
 the Department of Health Services
 (DHS).  This  three year  multi-task
 project,  started  in  1985,  and  under
 the supervision of Mr. Harry
 Freeman of EPA's  Hazardous Waste
 Engineering Research Laboratory,
 has provided  the  Department with
 staff  and contractual support.
 Projects related  to  the  program
 include:  (1) Waste Reduction
 (Minimization),  (2)  Technical
 Information Dissemination,  (3)
 Evaluation of  Potential  Economic
 Incentives,  (4) Land Restrictions
 Impact on Management of Restricted
Wastes, and  (5) On-site  Small
 Treatment Demonstration  Program.
      _This paper will discuss the
 specific studies made possible by
 the EPA Cooperative Agreement as
 well as state and federal statu-
 tory requirements and problems
 encountered in the process of
 implementing the elements of
 California's Waste Management
 Program.
 REGULATORY INCENTIVES AND STATUTORY
 MANDATES

 Regulatory Incentives

      The regulatory element of the
 Waste Reduction Program provides a
 major driving force for moving
 industry towards alternatives to
 land disposal.   In addition,  it
 provides some of the necessary
 tools for the Department to effec-
 tively implement the technical
 assistance and  information transfer
 components of the program.  Given
 this,  the Department has set  the
 following objectives:  (l)  to pro-
 vide a clear message that hazardous
 waste management in California must
 move towards waste reduction  and
 away from land disposal; (2)  to
 ensure utilization of available
 technology for  hazardous waste
 treatment; (3)  to require that
 industry be aware of and consider
 waste reduction whenever possible,
 and  (4)  to expand the California
 land disposal restriction program
 to coincide with the federal  land
 disposal  restrictions program.
California Land Disposal
Restrictions Program

     California's Land Disposal
Restriction Program was initiated
in December 1982, when the Depart-
ment implemented a regulatory pro-
gram to phase out land disposal of
certain hazardous wastes.  This
program provided a schedule of land
disposal restrictions for specific
hazardous wastes, the California
List, to be implemented, contingent
upon the availability of alterna-
tive treatment and/or recycling
capacity in the State.  The
restricted liquid wastes and
implementation schedule dates
                                  -4C1-

-------
include: (1) free cyanides greater
than 1000 mg/L (6-1-83); (2) dis-
solved metals, compounds, elements
containing arsenic, cadmium, chrom-
ium, lead, mercury, nickel, sele-
nium, or thallium  (1-1-84); (3)
acid wastes with a pH  less than 2.0
(1-1-84);  (4) PCB's greater than 50
mg/L  (1-1-84); and  (5) wastes  con-
taining halogenated organic com-
pounds  greater than 1,000 mg/L
(1-8-85).

     An additional  land  disposal
restriction for solid  hazardous
wastes  containing halogenated
compounds  in total  concentration
greater than 1,000  mg/L  is
scheduled  to go into effect 7-8-87.
Another requirement of Senate  Bill
509 (Carpenter, 1985), restricts
hazardous wastes  having a heating
value of 3,000 BTU's per pound,  to
 incineration or treatment as the
 only means of disposal, will go
 into effect on 1-1-88.  Other
 regula- tions restricting land
 disposal of hazardous waste
" containing volatile organics above
 a range of one to eight percent (to
 be specified) are to be developed
 by the Department on or before
 1-1-90.


 Federal Land Disposal Restrictions

      Section 3004 of the Resource
 Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA),
 as amended by the Hazardous and
 Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
 (HSWA), prohibits the continued
 placement of RCRA-regulated
 hazardous wastes in or on the land,
 including placement in landfills,
 land treatment areas, waste_piles,
 and surface impoundments  (with
 certain exceptions used  for the
 treatment  of hazardous wastes).
 The  amendments specify  dates  by
 which  these prohibitions  are  to
 take effect for  specific hazardous
 wastes with May  8, 1990,  being the
 deadline  for the last third of all
 RCRA listed wastes.   The wastes
 restricted and schedule dates are
 as follows: (1)  bulk liquids:
 5_8_85; (2) solvent waste:  11-8-86;
  (3)  California List:  7-8-87;  (4)
 first  third of  all RCRA listed
 wastes, decision on underground
injection, clean up wastes subject
to retrictions: 8-8-87; (5) dioxin
containing wastes (catagories F020
to F028):  11-8-88; (6) second third
of all RCRA listed wastes: 6-8-89;
and (7) last third of all RCRA
listed wastes: 1-1-90.

     Implementation of these state
and federal mandates has been im-  .
peded by a number of problems.  The
first problem area is inadequate
waste composition and volume infor-
mation.  Without this information
it is extremely difficult  for the
state  and industry to  assess the
potential  for waste reduction,
facility  needs, and compliance with
land disposal  restrictions.  The
second problem area is the lack of
performance  data  from different
demonstration treatment technology
projects.  Industries,  regulatory
agencies,  and the public are
seeking information related to the
evaluation of technologies before
extensive funds and time are
 invested and before the technology
becomes a permanent fixture in  an
 area.

      The third area of concern
 limiting the implementation of
 waste reduction programs is the
 limited number of off-site treat-
 ment facilities in the state.   The
 siting and regulatory requirements
 and the difficulty in obtaining
 environmental and liability insur-
 ance have severely limited the
 number of on-line treatment facil-
 ities in California.   Today there
 is a lack of incineration treatment
 capacity and only one off-site
 operating hazardous waste treatment
 facility in the state, General
 Portland.

      The Waste Reduction  Program  is
 addressing these implementation
 problems with the following pro-
 jects: (1) Waste stream  information
 accumulation and analysis;  (2)
 Determination of extent  and use of
 on-site  treatment; (3) Waste audit
 program;  (4) Waste management
 information transfer;  and (5)
 Demonstration  studies.   These are
 presented below.
                                     -462-

-------
  Waste Stream Information
  Accumulation and Analysis

       Hazardous waste generators and
  operators  of treatment,  storage,
  and  disposal facilities  in Cali-
  fornia must  now submit reports  to
  the  Department that  identify  the
  type and quantity of hazardous
  wastes shipped off-site  or wastes
  they have handled.   In addition,
  the  Department has also  requested
  more specific  information  pertain-
  ing  to the constituents  and concen-
  trations of materials in their
  waste streams'.  These reporting
  requirements should  improve the
  Department's and  industry's ability
  to assess the  potential  for waste
  reduction, facility  needs, and
  compliance with the  land disposal
  restrictions.

      As part of this program,  the
  Department of  Chemical Engineering
 at the University of California,
 Davis, is assisting the Department
 to characterize California's waste
 streams in terms of their suitabi-
 lity to various treatment, recy-
 cling, and reduction processes.
 Over 11,000 individual waste stream
 description reports,  containing
 information on constituents and
 concentrations of different wastes,
 will  be analyzed.   The principal
 tasks are to:  (l)  prepare protocol
 for analyzing the data according to
 specific criteria for a particular
 treatment,  recycling, or  reduction
 process;  (2)  develop  an easy access
 data  base format;  (3)  prepare  an
 analyses of this year's data,  and
 (4) prepare recommendations for
 future waste  stream description
 forms.  A final report will be
 available in Fall, 1987.
Determination Of On-site Treatment
Use

     The Department has reviewed
the 1985 Biennial Facility Reports
submitted on EPA's forms.  Although
useful, some of the major problems
with the EPA biennial facility
reports were identified as follows:
(1) no correlation existed between
the amount of hazardous wastes
  received and the ultimate disposal;
  (2)  discrepancies in report form's
  disposal codes  and disposal codes
  in  40  CFR;  (3)  no code for recy-
  cling  of wastes with subsequent
  reporting recycling as storage; (4)
  misunderstanding in reporting due
  to  similarities in appearance of
  facility reporting forms  and gener-
  ator's report forms;  and  (5)  double
  counting of  hazardous wastes
  created by generators reporting on-
  site storage as disposal  and then
  having TSD facilities claiming
  these  wastes as well.   Staff has
  redesigned the  form and the Depart-
  ment will be using  this in  1986
  data gathering  via  the  Annual
  Facility Report due.March l,  1987.

      After review and discussion of
  the EPA reports, California repor-
  ting requirements have been modi-
  fied to be consistent with  federal
  law and also  improved to obtain
 more complete and accurate infor-
 mation.  Hazardous waste generators
 must now submit a biennial report
 to the Department that covers the
 type and quantity of hazardous
 waste shipped off site.  Operators
 of treatment, storage, and disposal
 facilities must submit similar
 reports on the wastes they have
 handled.  The Department has, in
 the  forms provided to the genera-
 tors and operators,  requested addi-
 tional  information on the consti-
 tuents  and concentrations of mater-
 ials in their waste streams.  These
 reporting requirements will improve
 the  Department's ability to assess
 potential for waste reduction,
 facility needs,  and compliance with
 the  land disposal restrictions.

     Another  reporting provision
 which came into  effect with  the
 passage of Assembly  Bill 685 (Farr,
 1985) requires that  generators des-
 cribe,  in  their  biennial, reports,
 waste reduction  efforts  and  changes
 in waste generation  from the prev-
 ious year.  These reports will
 assist  the Department  in developing '
 information on effective waste
 reduction projects and an assess-
ment of waste reduction potential
 for specific industries.
                                   -463-

-------
     New reporting requirements for ;
generators concern changes to the
Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest.
Generators shipping waste off site
must now sign a certification form
which states that a program to
reduce the volume and toxicity of
waste generated to the degree
determined to be economically
feasible is in place and the method
of treatment, storage, or disposal
currently available which minimizes
the present and future threat to
humans and the environment has been
selected.

     After the above information is
collected and analyzed, the  Depart-
ment will be able  to predict how
much hazardous waste is produced in
California, how much is being  dis-
posed  on land, and what remaining
disposal capacity  exists  in the
state.   Projections can then be
made  as to  the types and  volumes of
wastes which will  be impacted  and
what  types  and scale of  storage,
recycling,  and treatment  facilities
will  be needed.
 WASTE AUDIT PROGRAM

      The Department has been admin-
 istering a program to provide tech-
 nical assistance for California
 industries as part of its coordina-
 tion, research, and development
 efforts to promote reduction or
 recycling of hazardous wastes.
 This program includes the Waste
 Audit Studies for hazardous waste
 generators targeting various
 industries.  Each waste audit study
 will focus on a specific industry
 and include an on-site evaluation
 of three to six firms within that
 industry.  For each firm, the manu-
 facturing process and/or operating
 systems will be audited, and the
 current waste management practices
 will be appraised to identify
 options that could be utilized to
 recycle, treat, or reduce the
 generation of hazardous wastes.
     The first set of waste audit
study contracts for approximately
$25,000 each were awarded in March,
1986, for the following: (1) pesti-
cide formulators, (2) paint indus-
try, (3) circuit board manufact-
urers,  (4) automotive repairs,and
(5) automotive paint shops.  Final
reports of the individual waste
audit studies will be available in
Summer, 1987.

     A  second set of waste  audit
studies will target the following
industries:  (1) photographic pro-
cessing laboratories, photographic
finishing, and motion picture film
processing;  (2) commercial  print-
ing, letterpress and screen,
engraving and etching;  (3)  educa-
tional, scientific,  and research
institutions;  (4) general medicine
and surgical hospitals  excluding
infectious wastes;  and  (5)  fiber-
glass  and reinforced molded or
rigid  plastic products  including
watercraft,  electrical  panels,
figures,  surfboards,  and building
panels.  Contracts  will be executed
in Spring, 1987,  with completion of
the final reports in Fall,  1987.
 WASTE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
 TRANSFER

      The objectives of this program
 are (1)  to make industry more aware
 of economic, technical, and
 environmental advantages of waste
 reduction; (2)  to establish credi-
 bility with industry that the State
 is available to assist them in the
 area of land disposal capacity and
 restrictions on land disposal_ of
 hazardous waste; and (3) to dis-
 seminate information and facts
 resulting from other components of
 the waste management program.

      The Department has been
 accomplishing these objectives
 through seminars, fact sheets,
 reports, and by operation of the
 California Waste Exchange.  The
                                    -464-

-------
Waste Exchange utilizes three major
avenues to encourage recycling.  A
Directory Of Industrial Recyclers
is published annually to inform
generators about companies presen-
tly available to recycle their
wastes.  A Newsletter/Catalog is
published on a triannual basis.
More details about this activity
are provided under the technology
transfer component of the program
which publicizes waste reduction
opportunities or successful waste
reduction projects. Staff also work
directly with individual companies
to assist them in recycling their
waste.

     Seminars provide a unique
opportunity for industry, regula-
tory agencies, and the public to
meet and discuss common goals,
problems, and solutions.  Seminars
on specific waste management have
been a successful strategy to
expand awareness of the regulated
community on waste reduction.

     The first seminar series,
fully funded and sponsored by the
Department, involved Solvent Waste
Management Alternatives.  Two semi-
nars were held in October, 1986;
one in Los Angeles and the second
in San Francisco.  A final report
entitled "Guide To Solvent Waste
Reduction Alternatives" was pre-
pared by ICF Consulting Associates,
Inc. and presented to all 500
attendees.   The focus of the study
was on practical waste management
alternatives to land disposal that
have potential for reducing the
amount and/or toxicity of solvent
waste generated.  Some of the major
tasks performed included: (1) iden-
tification of major solvent-user
industries in California; (2) a
review of current waste management
methods and technologies; and  (3)
characterizations of source
reduction alternatives for minimi-
zing solvent wastes, on-site and
off-site solvent recycling  treat-
ment alternatives.  A conference
proceedings entitled "Solvent Waste
Reduction Alternatives Symposia"
was also prepared and is available.

     A second symposium series
designed to educate California's
oil waste generators about alter-
natives to land disposal is
scheduled for March, 1988, in Los
Angeles and San Francisco.  The
study on which the symposium will
be based, will be limited to oil
wastes resulting from oil usage and
can include lubricants, coolants,
cutting and machining oils, and
hydraulic fluids.  A final report
summarizing the results of the
study and identifying the evalua-
tion methods of managing oil wastes
will be presented to each attendee.
A conference proceedings will like-
wise be available after the sympo-
sium.
DEMONSTRATION STUDIES

EPA Funded Projects

     The following projects are
receiving direct funding through
the EPA/DHS Cooperative Agreement.
This element of the project will
evaluate commercially available
innovative alternative technologies
for the treatment and on-site
recycling of hazardous wastes.
Each technology will be monitored
and evaluated for treatment effici-
encies and economic feasibility.
Extent of funding ranges from
$30,000 to $50,000.  The projects
are presented below.

     California Agricultural
Research will demonstrate the
efficacy and economic feasibility
of commercially available Aerobic
Composting for the treatment of
pesticide rinsewaters.  The demon-
stration project will take place at
the Chemical Waste Management
Treatment Facility in Kettleman
Hills, California,  during the
Spring of 1987.
                                   -465-

-------
     The Department of Environ-
mental Toxicology of the University
of California, Davis will evaluate
the treatment efficiency of an
Oxidation/Ultraviolet Light System
in conjunction with a biological
treatment system for the degrada-
tion of pesticide rinseates.  The
project will occur at the U.C.,
Davis campus during the Spring and
Summer of 1987.

     Wesley M. Toy, P.E. will
evaluate the efficacy and economic
feasibility of an Evaporative Waste
Concentrator for automotive repair
wastes.  The project will be per-
formed in conjunction with Safeway
Chemical in Saratoga, California in
the Spring of 1987.

     Roy F. Weston, Inc. will
demontrate the treatment effi-
ciency of a Low Temperature Thermal
Treatment System for soils contam-
inated with volatile organic com-
pounds.  This process involves the
stripping of volatile organic com-
pounds (VOC's) from soils utilizing
a recycling, low temperature oil
system (3OOF).  The demonstration
project will take place at a site
to be determined in the
Spring/Summer of 1987.

     Woodward-Clyde Consultants
will evaluate the treatment effic-
iency of Ambersorb XE-340 as an
alternative to granular activated
carbon for the adsorption of chlor-
inated solvents from industrial
waste stream.  This project will be
conducted in Cupertino, California
in the Spring of 1987.

     Ogden Environmental Services,
Inc., who recently purchased GA
Technologies circular combustion
division, will monitor and evaluate
a Circular Fluidized Bed Combustion
Process to determine treatment
efficiencies of cyanide and
fluoride removal from aluminum
spent potlining wastes.  The pro-
ject will occur in San Diego, CA in
the Spring of 1987.
Hazardous Waste Reduction Grant
Program

     The California Waste Reduction
Grant Program, established under
Assembly Bill 685 (Farr) to promote
innovative processes for managing
hazardous wastes, is entering its
second year.  The Department seeks
cost effective, practical strate-
gies and technologies which would
reduce the volume, mobility or
toxicity of hazardous wastes.  The
Department awarded a total of
$920,000 to 26 out of 97 applicants
for fiscal year 85-86.

     The major components of the
projects funded were: (1) waste
types which included waste oils,
low heating value liquids and
solids, pesticide rinsewaters,
metals, chlorinated still bottoms,
plating wastes and foundry sands;
(2) technologies which  included
biological, chemical, & thermal
treatment, recycling,   freeze
crystallization, mobile treat-
ment, and oxidation; and   (3)
industries which included oil and
gas refining, oil recycling,
semiconductor manufacturing,
pesticide application,  aerospace,
cast metals manufacturing, plating
and electric utilities.  Fifteen
feasibility studies, including six
for project designs, three for con-
struction and demonstration, and
two with public agency  or univer-
sity applicants were among the
funded projects.

     Based on the interest gener-
ated, the Department believes the
program will be highly  successful
in demonstrating and evaluating
waste reduction activities.  The
Department is now reviewing 106
grant proposals for the second year
funding of $1,000,000.
                                   -466-

-------
CONCLUSIONS

     Better knowledge in the areas
of waste composition and volume,
extent of treatment, and source
reduction methods should make the
California's hazardous waste
management program more effective
in the implementation of its
ultimate goal, reduction of the
volume of untreated waste being
land disposed.  New facilities and
expansions of existing facilites
will be needed to fully implement
the ambitious goals of the federal
and state statutes.  Major efforts
to overcome siting problems are
needed to allow for the use of
tested treatment alternatives.  The
State's hazardous waste management
program is being continuously
reviewed to assure that all its
elements contribute as effec-
tively as possible to the meeting
of California's waste reduction
goals.
                                  -467-

-------
                  FIELD ASSESSMENT OF STEAM STRIPPING VOLATILE ORGANICS
                               FROM AQUEOUS WASTE STREAMS
              Marvin Branscome, Clark Allen, Scott Harkins, and Keith Leese
                               Research Triangle Institute
                         Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

                                           and

                                 Dr. Benjamin L. Blaney
                          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                    Cincinnati, Ohio
                                        ABSTRACT

    This paper discusses the removal of volatile organics (VO) from aqueous waste streams
by steam stripping and summarizes the effectiveness of VO removal from the.waste, the air
emissions from the process, and the cost of the treatment process.  Tests were conducted
at two chemical plants that used continuous steam strippers to remove VO from the waste-
water.  The operation at Plant H, which produces ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride
monomer, treated about 852 liters per minute (L/min) or 225 gallons per minute (gal/min)
of aqueous waste containing about 6 grams per liter (g/L) of VO.  The .operation at Plant
I, which produces one-carbon chlorinated solvents, was smaller and treated 42 L/min (11
gal/min) of aqueous waste containing about 6 g/L of VO.

    The test program evaluated the removal of VO from the water, which was about 99.8 to
99.999 percent at the two plants.  At Plant H, the concentration of VO in the stripper
bottoms ranged from 0.34 to 36 parts per million (ppm) with an average of 9.7 ppm.  This
wide range was caused by variations in the concentration of chloroform (the major consti-
tuent in the bottoms), which was apparently related to column fouling.  This stripper
processes wastewater containing about 1.4 g/L of filterable solids.  At Plant I, the con-
centration of VO in the bottoms ranged from less than 0.005 to 0.13 ppm.  Solids and an
organic layer are removed in decanters at Plant I prior to steam stripping to provide a
feed stream containing.about 0.01 g/L of filterable solids.  Emissions of VO from the
decanter and storage tank vents at Plant I were estimated as 46 megagrams per year
(Mg/yr).  Significant vent rates of VO were also measured from the condensers at both
sites.  The condenser vent.rate at Plant H averaged about 20 Mg/yr compared to 11 Mg/yr at
Plant I.  The condenser efficiency at Plant H ranged from an average of 6 percent for
vinyl chloride to 99.5 percent for ethylene dichloride.  At Plant I, the condenser effi-
ciency ranged from 89 percent for chloromethane to 94 percent for chloroform.
INTRODUCTION

    The EPA Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards (OAQPS) is currently devel-
oping regulations under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and
its 1984 amendments to control air emis-
sions from hazardous waste treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs).
In support of this regulatory development
effort, EPA's Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory (HWERL) is conducting
                                          -468-

-------
field assessments of hazardous waste
treatment processes that could be used to
remove volatile organics (VO) from wastes.
Volatile organics are defined as those
organic compounds detected and quantified
by EPA procedures, which include both
purgeable and extractable compounds.
Aqueous wastes represent a high percentage
of the total volume of hazardous wastes.
These aqueous wastes are often stored,
treated, or disposed of in open area  .
sources, such as surface impoundments and
open wastewater treatment units, which are
sometimes aerated.  Steam stripping of the
waste prior to placement in these open
units is one promising technique that may-
reduce VO emissions from these sources.

APPROACH

    This project focused on the use of
continuous steam strippers.  There are
potential cost and cost-effectiveness
advantages of continuous stripping,
particularly for high volume aqueous
wastes.  Batch processes have been evalu-
ated previously.  The goals of the testing
effort included measuring the effective-
ness of the process for VO removal from
the waste, measuring any air emissions,
and assessing the cost of treatment.
Samples of the feed stream to the steam
strippers were taken for analysis by gas
chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS)
to identify purgeable and extractable
organic compounds.  No significant quanti-
ties of extractable organics were found,at
either plant; consequently, the sampling
and analysis for each test focused on the
purgeable organic compounds that were
identified.

    The sampling at each site was conduct-
ed over a 2-day period with 5 samples
taken each day at about 2-hour intervals
from each sampling point.  The primary
sampling points included the steam strip-
per's feed stream, bottoms, and condensate
as shown in Figures 1 and 2.  These liquid
samples were collected in duplicate in 40
milliliter  (mL) vials with no headspace.
At Plant H, these samples were analyzed by
EPA Method 624, which is a purge-and-trap
procedure with analysis by GC/MS.  The
vapor flow rate and composition from the
steam stripper's condenser system were
also measured.  At Plant H, the con-
denser/decanter was vented within a closed
system to an incinerator.  The system was
maintained at a pressure of 1.3 atmos-
pheres.  The vapor flow rate in this
closed system was measured by a tracer gas
dilution technique.  Propane was metered
into the vapor inlet to the condenser at a
known rate and the concentration of pro-
pane was measured downstream to calculate
the vapor flow rate.

    Samples of the wastewater from Plant I
were screened by GC/MS to identify the
organic compounds.  Because only purgeable
chlorinated compounds were found, EPA
Method 601 was used for analysis of the
samples from Plant I.  At Plant I, the
vapor flow rate from the condenser system
was measured directly with a wet gas meter
because the system was vented to the
atmosphere.  Vapor samples were collected
in electropolished stainless steel canis-
ters that had been previously cleaned and
evacuated.  The vapor flow rates and con-
centration measurements were used to
calculate condenser efficiency.  Addition-
al liquid samples at each plant were taken
for analysis of solids content, metals,
pH, and VO in the headspace.  Process data
were collected for the steam stripping
system and included flow rates and temper-
atures of the various streams entering and
leaving the stripper.

    The treatment system at Plant I also
included removal of solids and any separ-
ate organic layer in decanters prior to
steam stripping.  Samples were taken from
the streams entering and leaving the de-
canter for analysis of VO, solids, and
metals to assess the effectiveness of the
treatment and to determine the character-
istics of residuals.  In addition, vapor
samples were taken from the headspace of
the decanter and from the feed tank for
the steam stripper to estimate air emis-
sions.

PROCESS DESCRIPTION

    The steam stripper at Plant H is used
to treat wastewater from the production of
ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride
monomer.  At Plant I, the steam stripper
is used to treat wastewater generated from
the production of methylene chloride,
carbon tetrachloride, and chloroform.  The
characteristics of the two waste streams
are summarized in Table 1.  The primary
constituents at Plant H were ethylene
dichloride (5,630 ppm) and chloroform (271
                                          -469-;

-------
ppm).  A total of  12 other compounds,
mostly chlorinated organics, were also
detected at Plant  H at average  levels that
ranged from 0.3 ppm (for benzene) to 11
ppm  (for 1,1-dichloroethane).   At Plant I,
methylene chloride (4,490 ppm)  and chloro-
form (1,270 ppm) were the major constitu-
ents.  A total of  four additional chlori-
nated compounds were detected at average
levels that ranged from 5.3 ppm (for
1,1,2-trichloroethane) to 55 ppm (for
carbon tetrachloride).  Total VO at both
plants averaged about 6,000 ppm (6 g/L).

     The stream stripper at Plant H used a
tray column to treat water at a rate of
about 852 L/m1n (225 gal/min).  Solids at
this plant were not removed prior to steam
stripping and were processed through the
steam stripper at  a level of 1.4 g/L for
filterable solids.  Fouling of  the heat
exchanger and column from the accumulation
of solids requires that this system be
backflushed or cleaned periodically.  The
company prefers to process the  solids
through the steam  stripper rather than
install a system for solids removal.
Removal of solids  prior to steam stripping
would generate a sludge that could be a
hazardous waste requiring treatment before
disposal.  The vapors from the  stripper
pass through a primary condenser cooled
with cooling tower water followed by a
secondary condenser cooled with refriger-
ated glycol.  Noncondensibles vented from
the  secondary condenser are routed to an
Incinerator.  The  condensate, which con-
tains both an aqueous and organic phase,
is recycled to the production process.

     The steam stripper at Plant I was a
packed column used to treat about 42 L/min
(11  gal/min) of wastewater.  The waste-
water is treated for removal of solids and
any  separate organic phase in a decanter
prior to stripping.  The treatment in-
cludes pH adjustment,  addition of floccu-
lant, mixing,  and  settling for phase
separation of each batch in the decanter
over a 24-hour period.  The aqueous phase
1s decanted and stored In the feed tank
prior to steam stripping.  Vapors from the
steam stripper pass through a primary
condenser and a secondary condenser,  both
cooled with cooling tower water.  The
condensate 1s separated in a decanter and
the aqueous layer is returned to the
column.   The heavier organic layer is
removed periodically and returned to the
production process.  The two solids
decanters are also vented to the secondary
condenser.  The feed storage tank is vent-
ed to the atmosphere through a conserva-
tion vent.

    After steam stripping, the wastewater
from Plant H is sent to the wastewater
treatment process, which includes solids
removal and biological treatment.  At
Plant I, no additional treatment usually
is needed (other than occasional pH ad-
justment) prior to discharge to the Y-iver.

VO REMOVAL FROM WATER

    At Plant H, the removal of the major
component (ethylene dichloride) was gener-
ally on the order of 99.999 percent with a
feed concentration of 5,630 ppm reduced to
0.097 ppm in the stripper bottoms (see
Table 1).  The removal of chloroform aver-
aged 99.6 percent for 6 of the 10 runs and
averaged only 92.4 percent for the other 4
runs.  A feed concentration of 271 ppm
chloroform was reduced to an average in
the bottoms of 9.6 ppm with a range of
0.13 to 36 ppm.  The variations in chloro-
form removal appeared to be related to
column fouling problems because the lowest
values in the stripper bottoms were found
after backflushing the steam stripper, and
the highest levels were found before back-
flushing when the column pressure drop was
increasing.  None of the other 12 volatile
compounds found in the feed at 0.3 to 11
ppm was detected in the stripper bottoms
at a detection limit of 0.01 ppm.  The
percent removal for these compounds gener-
ally exceeded 99 percent.  Total VO at
this plant was reduced from an average
feed concentration of about 6,000 ppm to
an average of 9.8 ppm in the effluent,  or
about 99.8 percent removal  of total  VO.

    The major constituent at Plant I
(methylene chloride)  was reduced from an
average feed concentration of 4,490 ppm to
0.011 ppm (99.999 percent removal).
Chloroform was reduced from 1,270 ppm to
0.006 ppm and carbon  tetrachloride was
reduced from 55 ppm to <0.005 ppm.   The
other chlorinated compounds present in  the
feed (chloromethane,  trichloroethylene,
and 1,1,2-trichloroethane)  were not de-
tected in the bottoms at a detection limit
of 0.005 ppm.   The total  VO at this plant
was reduced from about 6,000 ppm to <0.037
ppm with about 99.999 percent removal.
                                          -470-

-------
The removal  efficiency of this steam
stripper over the 2-day test was more
consistent than that observed at Plant H.
During the first test day, the levels of
chloroform in the bottoms ranged from 7 to
9 ppb compared to all values <5 ppb on the
second test day.  None of the volatile
compounds in the stripper bottoms exceeded
0.023 ppm for any of the samples.

CONDENSER EFFICIENCY AND AIR EMISSIONS .

    The condenser efficiency (Table 2) was
evaluated at both plants from the quantity
of VO entering the overhead system and the
quantity leaving with the noncondensible
gases.  The condenser system at Plant H
included two condensers in series that
used cooling tower water followed by
refrigerated glycol at 2 *C.  A total of 7
of the 14 compounds detected in the feed
were also detected and quantified in the
vented vapors.  The condenser removed 99.5
percent of the major constituent (ethylene
dichloride) and about 96 percent of the
chloroform.  The removal efficiency for
compounds present in lower concentrations
was much lower.  Vinyl chloride removal in
the condenser averaged only 6 percent and
indicated that this compound passed
through the condenser in the vapor phase
and was sent to the incinerator.  The
average flow rate from the condenser was
3.1 L/s and the total VO from the vent was
about 20 Mg/yr  (0.62 g/s).  Although the
condenser removed 99.5 percent of the
ethylene dichloride from the vapor,
ethylene dichloride was the major compo-
nent of the vented vapors and comprised ..
about one-half of the total VO vented to
the incinerator.

    The condenser system at Plant I also .
included two condensers in series; how-
ever, both were cooled with cooling tower
water.  Because of no significant differ-
ences in vapor phase concentrations and
temperatures from samples taken after the
two condensers, the small secondary con-
denser apparently was not removing any
additional constituents.  All of the sig-
nificant condensation was provided by the
primary condenser on the  steam stripper.
Vapor phase concentrations of VO after the
primary condenser were high and averaged
44 percent VO by volume in the vapor phase
or a mass concentration of 1.6 g/L at 25
*C.  The vent rate was measured as 0.2
L/s.  The condenser  removed about 90
percent of the major constituent
(methylene chloride) and about 94 percent
of the chloroform from the vapors.  The
overall removal efficiency for total VO
was approximately 91 percent.  Emissions
from the secondary condenser vent due to
steam stripping were measured as 11 Mg/yr
(0.34 g/s).

    The vapor space in the solids decanter
contained primarily methylene chloride (28
to 32 volume percent), chloroform (6.4 to
7.6 percent), carbon tetrachloride  (1.5 to
3.8 percent), and chloromethane (0.6 to
1.0 percent).  The vapor space in the feed
tank also contained methylene chloride
(9.7 to 12 percent), chloroform (2.5 to,
3.1 percent), carbon tetrachloride  (0.7 to
0.8 percent), and chloromethane (0.2 per-
cent).  Emissions from these two tanks
were estimated based on the measured vapor
phase concentrations and the working
losses from  the tanks based on-a water
transfer rate of 11 gal/min.  Total VO
emissions from the solids decanter  were
estimated as 35 Mg/yr or 1.7 grams  per
liter  (g/L)  of water treated.  Total VO
emissions from the feed tank were esti-r,
mated as .11  Mg/yr or 0.5 g/L treated. ' The
total VO emissions from the,three major
sources (condenser vent, solids decanter
vent, and feed tank vent) were estimated
as 57 .Mg/yr  or about 2.7 g/L treated.  The
estimate of  annual emissions is based on
an average water treatment rate of  11
gal/min for  50 weeks during a year.

    Samples  taken from the-solids decanter
showed that  the treatment process could
reduce filterable solids from 1,100 ppm to
50 ppm.  Samples from the storage tank,
which represented water decanted before
our test, showed filterable solids  levels
of 11 ppm.   Reductions in chromium, cop-
per, nickel, lead, and zinc were, also
observed after treatment.  Solids removal
prior to steam stripping decreases  column
cleaning requirements and probably
improves the consistency of the operation.
However, the process generates about
190,000 L/yr of sludge, which contains the
chlorinated  compounds at levels of  20 to
30 percent.  The solids removal process
also increases the capital and operating
cost of the  treatment system.  However,
the bottoms  from the steam stripper at
this plant do  not require any additional
wastewater treatment  (other than occasion-
al pH  adjustment) before discharge.
                                          -471-

-------
 COST

     Cost data were not available for the
 small  steam stripper at Plant I.  However,
 cost data were available for the steam
 stripper at Plant H and for a similar
 operation at Plant K,  which treated  a
 wastewater stream similar to that at Plant
 H;   The  steam stripper at Plant  K was not
 evaluated 1n a full-scale test;  however,
 process  data,  cost data,  and samples were
 obtained during a one-day plant  visit.

     The  basic process  equipment  for  the
 steam  stripping operation at Plant H
 includes a feed storage and surge tank,
 heat exchanger, the column and trays,  two
 condensers 1n series,  a decanter,  8  pumps,
 Instrumentation,  piping,  and insulation.
 The  total  installed capital  cost was esti-
 mated  as $950,000 (1986 dollars).  The
 major  annual  operating cost components
 Include  utilities (primarily steam),
 operating and maintenance labor,  and
 laboratory support for analyses.   A  credit
 is Included for the recovery of  ethylene
 dichloride that is recycled to the produc-
 tion process.   The annual  operating  cost
 was estimated  as  $250,000/yr.  The total
 annualized  cost,  which  Includes  capital
 recovery based  on an interest  rate of 10
 percent  and a  lifetime  of 10 years, was
 estimated as $405,000/yr  or $0.89/1,000 L
 treated.

    The  data from the steam  stripper at
 Plant H  are compared in Table  3 with data
 obtained from a similar stripper at Plant
 K during a  one-day plant  visit.  One dif-
 ference between the two types  is that the
 stripper at Plant  H used  trays for vapor/
 liquid contact whereas the  Plant K opera-
 tion uses a packed column.  The basic feed
 constituents are  similar; however, Plant K
 has a higher concentration of  1,2-di-
 chloroethane 1n the feed.  The difference
 in annual operating cost  is probably
 attributable to the higher rate of steam
 usage at Plant K where approximately 75
percent of the annual operating cost is
 for steam.  Both of these steam strippers
 achieve similar effluent  (or bottoms)
 concentrations of  VO in the range of 1 to
2 ppm.   Although the steam usage for Plant
 K appears to be higher than that at Plant
H, the steam rates in terms of VO removed
are very similar  (6.2 and 6.7 kg steam/kg
VO removed).  The small difference in cost
effectiveness is probably not significant
 and  can  likely be  attributed to the higher
 feed concentrations observed at Plant K.

     Steam  usage contributes significantly
 to the annual operating cost of a steam
 stripper.  The steam usage at  Plants I and
 K averaged about 0.1 kg/kg water treated
 compared to 0.036  kg/kg treated for Plant
 H.   (Each  of these plants used heat ex-
 changers to preheat the stripper feed with
 the  hot  bottoms stream from the steam
 stripper.)  These  values compare favorably
 with some  published design information on
 steam usage.  Typical values of 0.07 to
 0.24 (1),  0.1 to 0.3 (3), and  0.31 (2) kg
 steam/kg water treated have been reported.

 CONCLUSIONS

     Steam  stripping can remove 99.8 to
 over 99.999 percent of the purgeable
 organic  compounds  found in the two waste
 streams.   The presence of solids in the
 wastewater can lead to fouling problems
 and  variations in  performance; however,
 wastewater containing 1.4 g/L  of filter-
 able  solids can be processed in a tray
 column steam stripper.  When the condenser
 and tanks  are Vented to the atmosphere,
 emissions of 20 to 57 Mg/yr can result.
 The cost effectiveness of stripping a
 saturated wastewater stream in systems
 designed for 680 to 820 L/min was on the
 order of $120 to $220/Mg VO removed.   The
water treatment cost ranged from $0.89 to
 $1.57 per Mg or $3.38 to $5.96 per 1,000
gallons of water.

 REFERENCES

 1.  Ehrenfeld,  J.,  and J.  Bass.  Handbook
    for Evaluating Remedial  Action
    Technology Plans.EPA 600/2-87-076.
    August 1983.

2.  Nathan, M.  F.   Choosing a Process  for
    Chloride Removal.   Chemical
    Engineering.   January  1978.  p.  93-
    100.

3.  Shukla, H.  M.,  et al.   Process Design
    Manual  for Stripping of Organics.   EPA
    600/2-84-139.August  19847
                                         -472-

-------
      TABLE 1.   SUMMARY OF AVERAGE STRIPPER FEED (IN) AND BOTTOMS (OUT)
                            CONCENTRATIONS (ppm)a
Constituent
Ethyl ene di chloride
Chloroform
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
1 , 1-Di chl oroethane
1 , 1-Di chl oroethene
1 , 2-Di chl oroethene
Methyl ene chloride
Tetrachl oroethene
1,1, 2-Tri chl oroethane
Tri chl oroethene
Vinyl chloride
Total
Plant H
, In •
5,630
271
0.27
1.7
0.38
11
4.7
8.9
1.2
1.4
7.5
4.8
8.4
5,950

Out
0.097
9.6
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<9.8
       Filterable solids (g/L)
1.4
0.93
                                                    Plant I
Constituent
Methyl ene chloride
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloromethane
Trichloroethylene
1,1, 2-Tri chl oroethane
Total
Filterable solids (g/L)
•-In
4,490
1,270
55
33
5.6
5.3
5,860
0.011
Out
0.011
0.006
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.005
<0.037
0.009
aAverages of 10 samples taken over a 2-day test.
                                     -473-

-------
TABLE 2.  SUMMARY OF AVERAGE CONDENSER VENT RATES AND EFFICIENCIES

                           Plant H
Constituent
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
1 , 1-Di chl oroethene
1 , 1-Di chl oroethane
1 , 2-Di chl oroethene
Chloroform
Ethyl ene di chloride
Condenser
loading
(g/s)
0.089
0.081
0.036
0.11
0.006
2.9
63
Vent rate
(g/s)
0.084
0.043
0.031
0.013
0.001
0.11
0.34
Condenser
efficiency
(percent)
6
47
15
88
84
96
99.5
   Total
  66
  0.62
   99
                           Plant I
   Constituent
Condenser
 loading
  (g/s)
Vent rate
  (g/s)
Condenser
efficiency
(percent)
 Chloromethane               0.021
 Methylene chloride          2.9
 Chloroform                  0.81
 Carbon tetrachloride        0.038

   Total                     3.8
                0.0024
                0.29
                0.045
                0.0039
                0.34
                   89
                   90
                   94
                   90

                   91
                               -474-

-------
                           TABLE 3.  COST COMPARISON
Item
Capital cost ($)
Operating cost ($/yr)
Total annual! zed cost ($/yr)a
Average feed rate (L/min)
Steam rate (kg/h)
Feed constituents (ppm)
1 , 2-Di chl oroethane
Chloroform
Other VO
Bottoms constituents (ppm)
1, 2-Di chl oroethane
Chloroform
Other VO
Steam usage
kg/kg water
kg/ kg VO removed
Cost-effectiveness
$/Mg VO removed
$/l,000 L treatedf
Plant H
950,000
250,000
405,000
820
1,790
5,600
270
59
0.16
0.8C
<0.01
0.036
6.2
220d
0.89
Plant K
700 000
450,000
564,000
680
4,090
15,000b
175
31b
.037b
1.3b
1.4b
0.10
6.7
120e
1.57
aBased on a 10-year lifetime at 10% (Capital recovery factor = 0.163).
bBased on a single sample analysis from presurvey trip.
cBased on 6 of 10 runs.
^Based. on 1,820 Mg/yr recovered.
eEstimated from single analysis and 329 days/year operation.
      equals $/Mg treated.
                                     -475-

-------

                                        a.

                                        a>
                                        _c

                                        "a.


                                        CO
                                        w

                                        II

                                        OO
                                        JO

                                        a.
                                         g
                                         o
                                        "a.


                                         CO
                                         v>

                                        •n
                                         c
                                         to
                                         i_
                                         a>
                                         a.

                                        .£•
                                         CD
                                         to
                                         O

                                         O

                                         +5
                                         CO


                                         a>
                                         .e
                                         u
                                         CO
                                         I
                                         at
-476-

-------
  I
oo
ta
.1
       C SJ

       8*
                    I
                    o
                    CQ
                 a

                 i
                   8'
                 o"

                 55
K

O
                                              O   £


                                                  _co

                                                  CL
                                                           a a>
                                                           C Q.

                                                           '5 E

                                                           aa
                                                           °> l_
                                                           c o


                                                           It
                                                   <0 O


                                                   O O)
                                                   J= C

                                                   "1.

                                                   •S i
                                                           cs



                                                           1
                                                           O)
               I

             1 I

             is

             S3
             « g
               S1
             	o
                           N —
                           ta
                              T

                               8
                        -477- •

-------
                  FIELD ASSESSMENT OF THE FATE OF VOLATILE ORGANICS IN
                             AERATED WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS
                                       David Green
                               Research Triangle Institute
                      Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27709

                                           and

                                       Bart Eklund
                                   Radian Corporation
                                  Austin, Texas  78766
                                        ABSTRACT

    Aeration of wastewater containing volatile organic compounds in activated sludge sys-
tems effectively removes many of these compounds from the wastewater prior to discharge.
Studies were conducted at a full-scale treatment systems to determine the relative extent
to which various compounds were destroyed biologically and stripped into the air.  Direct
measurements of air emissions were made through sampling and chemical analysis of off-
gases from the aeration tank of an activated sludge unit.  Indirect measurements were made
by comparing compound specific biological oxidation rates obtained in closed bottles to
total disappearances across the treatment units.  Additional measurements were made to
determine potential removal of organics in waste sludge streams.  This paper describes
these measurement techniques and results of the studies.
INTRODUCTION

    Industrial wastewater is often treated
1n aerated biological oxidation units to
remove dissolved organic chemicals prior
to discharge or reuse.  For relatively
dilute streams containing biodegradable
compounds, treatment processes such as
activated sludge are typically effective
and economical.  Organic material is re-
moved from wastewater in these processes
by aerobic organisms which use the materi-
al as a food source.  Oxygen is supplied
to the organisms either by bubbling air
through the wastewater, agitating the
surface of the wastewater or some combina-
tion of these mechanisms.  In addition to
supplying oxygen to the organisms respon-
sible for biodegradation, the aeration 1s
necessary to keep the biomass suspended
and to provide adequate mixing.
    When volatile and semi volatile com-
pounds are present in the wastewater which
is aerated, the possibility exists that
some or all of the removal of these com-
pounds results from mass transfer to the
air rather than biological decomposition.
In order to determine the relative
importance of these mechanisms, the total
removal in the unit must be determined and
a direct or indirect measurement of air
emissions must be made.  An indirect
measurement of air emissions can be made
by determining the rate of biooxidation in
a closed system where mass transfer to the
air is not significant, and comparing this
rate to the total.disappearance measured
across the actual treatment unit.  Direct
air emissions measurements can be made by
sampling and analyzing air over the
aeration tank in a way that permits an
accurate calculation of the flux from the
                                          -478-

-------
aeration tank.  The accuracy of either
direct or indirect methods depends on the
capability of the technique to monitor the
physical or biochemical process without
significantly affecting the rate.  The
accuracy of chemical analyses of gas or
liquid samples is also crucial to the
accuracy of the overall measurement.

    This study was done as part of a
project to support efforts by the EPA
Office of Air Quality, Planning, and
Standards to estimate air emissions from
specific treatment processes.  An
understanding of the potential magnitude
of emissions of this type is required for
development of national emissions models
in support of regulations under the
Resources Conservation and Recovery Act.
The major objectives of this field test
were to obtain direct measurements of air
emissions from a submerged aeration
activated sludge tank using an isolation
mass flux chamber at various locations on
the tank surface, and to also measure
compound specific biodegradation rates and
total removals in the activated sludge
tank so that a calculation of air
emissions could be made by difference.  In
addition, process operating conditions
which affect both biochemical and physical
removal were monitored.

    At the outset of the project, it was
hoped that a comparison between the direct
and indirect measurement techniques could
be made on a compound-specific basis.  A
confirmation of the indirect measurements
by the direct measurement technique would
support use of the indirect technique at
surface aerated facilities where direct
air measurements are more difficult.
Analytical limitations precluded this
comparison at this site except for the
compound, 1,1,1-trichloroethane.  The
phenolic compounds determined by EPA
priority pollutant methods in liquid
samples were not quantifiable with the gas
phase analytical system used in this
study.

    Minor objectives of the field test
included determination of overall removals
of specific organic compounds from the
wastewater treatment system as a whole and
determination of experimentally measured
air/water and water/biomass solids
partition coefficients for use in generic
evaluations of similar systems.  The test
was conducted by Research Triangle
Institute (RTI) and Radian Corporation.
RTI-had primary responsibility for liquid
sampling and analysis, total removal
calculations, air/water and water/biomass
solids partition coefficients, and
compound specific biodegradation rate
determinations.  Radian had primary
responsibility for air sampling and
analysis and direct air emissions
calculations.  Sampling was conducted
between September 22 and September 26,
1986.

TEST DESCRIPTION

    At the facility tested, wastewater is
collected at various points in the
manufacturing area of the plant and pumped
intermittently to a sump in the wastewater
treatment area.  Wastewater is pumped
intermittently from this sump to an
equalization tank with a residence time of
approximately 90 hours.  The equalization
tank is not completely mixed and is
operated primarily to accommodate  •
hydraulic surges.                      '

    Wastewater is then pumped to a split-
ter box where it is mixed with recycled
sludge and divided between two identical
parallel above-ground concrete aeration
tanks providing approximately six days
residence time.  Air is supplied through
static mixers in each tank.  Approximately
two inches of foam was present on the
surface of the tanks except in the areas
directly above the mixers.  The aeration
tanks contained 2,500 mg/L of mixed liquor
suspended solids during the test. 'The
water level is maintained by an overflow
weir.

    The wastewater from the two tanks
overflows to a splitter box where it is
recombined and then divided evenly between
two clarifiers.  Sludge is returned to the
aeration tanks at the influent splitter
box in an amount sufficient to maintain
the desired volatile suspended solids
content of the mixed liquor.   '

AIR SAMPLING

    The tank was divided into twenty-seven
2.44 m x 2.44 m grids.  An enclosure > -
device, the isolation emission flux   •
chamber (see Figure 1),-was used to  ••'?••
measure the off-gas flow rate from the
                                          -479-

-------
different parts of a grid.  A slipstream
of the sample gas was collected for
hydrocarbon analysis.

    The first day and a half of sampling
was used to assess the spatial variability
of a grid in terms of VOC emissions and
air flow rate.  To accomplish this, flow
rate measurements and THC concentration
measurements were made at various grid
points and locations within the grids.
Only the on-site total hydrocarbon
analysis was performed for samples
collected on the first days of sampling.
Based upon this preliminary work, the tank
was divided into three zones, directly
above the aerators (A), foam covered  (C),
and non-aerated (NA).  These zones are
shown schematically in Figure 2.

    The order of sampling was randomly
determined, with 18 grid points (six per
zone) being sampled over the following
two-day period.  At each location, a gas
sample was collected for on-site methane,
and total non-methane hydrocarbons (TNMHC)
and screening-level compound analysis, and
a second gas sample was collected for
detailed speciation at Radian's Austin
laboratories.  A total of 20 stainless
steel canister samples (including
duplicates) and a canister blank were
collected over the two-day sampling
period.  Two liquid samples were collected
1n VOA vials at each of the eighteen
sampling points.  The total air flow rate
to the tank was determined by using the
fan performance curve (amperes vs. air
flow rate) and amperage data continuously
recorded on a stripchart recorder during
the site investigation.

    The air sampling approach chosen used
an enclosure device,  referred to as an
emission Isolation flux chamber, to sample
gaseous emissions from a 0.13 m2 surface
area.  A pump was used to withdraw sample
gas from the flux chamber at the same rate
at which it entered.   This was confirmed
by monitoring the pressure in the chamber.
The volumetric flow rate of air through
the, chamber was recorded and the
concentration of the species of interest
was measured at the exit of the chamber.
The emission rate was calculated as:
        E.R.-i
         where:   E.R.j  =  emission  rate  of species,
                           i  (/
-------
electrode.  Volatile suspended solids
analyses of aeration tank effluent, re-
cycle sludge, and influent splitter box
samples corresponding to biodegradation
rate determination samples were conducted
by Standard Method 209E.  Volatile sus-
pended solids data were supplemented with
data supplied by plant personnel deter-
mined using the same method.  Chemical
oxygen demand data were obtained from
plant records.

BIODEGRADATION RATE TESTING

    In order to distinguish.between re-
moval of organics from mixed liquor due to
biodegradation and removal due to mass
transfer into the air, experiments were
conducted which permitted biodegradation
to take place while limiting air strip-
ping.  Samples of a mixture of aeration
tank feed and recycled sludge were dipped
from the influent splitter box at the
upstream end of the aeration tank.        :

    Each sample was divided using a two
liter Nalgene  graduated cylinder as fol-
lows:  up to seven, one liter bottles were
partially filled with 500 ml of mixture,
one one-liter bottle was completely filled
with mixture, and one specially prepared
500 ml bottle was partially filled with
250 mL of mixture.  The filled bottle was
designated for volatile suspended solids
analysis and immediately stored on ice.
One of the partially filled one liter
bottles was immediately preserved with 10
ml of saturated copper sulfate solution
and agitated gently to assure that the
copper sulfate solution was distributed.
This bottle was then used to fill two 40
mL septum vials.  The one liter bottle and
the two 40 mL bottles were stored on ice
immediately thereafter for shipment to a
laboratory for organic compound analysis.

    The specially prepared 500 mL bottle
had a plastic tubing stub fitted into and
protruding through the cap.  Tygon tubing
was connected to the stub leading to a
plastic T-connector.  One side of the T-
connector was attached to a short length
of tubing filled with lithium hydroxide.
The other side of the T-connector was con-
nected to a mercury manometer.  This
bottle was used to monitor oxygen uptake
over time.
    The partially filled one liter bottles
and the partially filled 500 mL bottle
were then mounted on a wrist action shaker
and continuously agitated.  Over a period
of about 19 hours, bottles were removed
from the shaker, one by one and preserved
with copper sulfate using the same
procedure as for the initial sample.
Similarly, 40 mL vials were filled for
purgeable organics analysis.

    Biodegradation rate test samples were
analyzed for purgeable organics, acid
extractable priority pollutants, and meth-
anol.  A total of four tests were conduct-
ed, with two tests run simultaneously from
the same sample of aeration tank feed/
recycle sludge mixture.

    The total oxygen uptake within the
specially prepared bottle was monitored to
insure that the oxygen within the
headspace was not exhausted.  When the
oxygen in the headspace was approximately
50% of that initially present, the bottles
remaining on the shaker were vented and
fresh air was allowed to replace that
initially present.  This was done once in
the course of the experiment.

RESULTS

Direct Air Emissions Measurements

    Compound specific emissions rates are
given in Table 1.  Methane emissions were
larger than those of any class of
compound.  The TNMHC emitted from the
lagoon was much less than 1 kg/day.
Emissions were highest for Zone C (foam
covered areas) in all cases except in the
case of the insignificant amount of sulfur
species and unidentified VOs emitted.
Zone A (directly above the aerators)
emissions are generally less than Zone C
reflecting the smaller total area of
Zone A.  It is probable that sufficient
air is present in Zone A to strip out all
VOs and that any excess air merely acts to
dilute the off-gas.

    These values have been corrected for
the blank sample values and for a sampling
bias at low flow rate.  The total air flow
rate based on the fan curve was 15 m3/min.

    The spatial variabilities observed
were not expected and indicate that the
subsurface flow patterns or the emission
                                          -431-

-------
processes are not fully understood.  The
large methane emissions from the aerated
zone Imply either a non-biological origin
or production outside the aerated zone.

Indirect Measurements

    Typical biodegradation test data are
shown 1n Figure 3.  The slope of the
linear regression line through the data
points represents the best estimate of the
compound specific biodegradation rate.
Concentrations would be expected to
decline monotonically in the absence of
chemical analysis errors.  This slope was
then normalized for the biomass concentra-
tion.  Selected biodegradation rate con-
stants are given in Table 3.  Multiple
rates for the same compound reflect data
obtained during different tests.  Taking
the rate constant for phenol, as an ex-
ample, as 0.25 /jg/min g biomass, would
Imply that a tank with a six day residence
time, operated with mixed liquor volatile
suspended solids of 2500 mg/L could effec-
tively blodegrade 5400 /jg/L of phenol.
The actual difference between phenol in
the influent and the effluent of the aera-
tion tank during the study period averaged
6200 /ig/L  (based on a weighted average of
aeration tank feed concentration and
recycled sludge vs. aeration tank efflu-
ent,  the effluent and recycle streams
were below the detection limit of 250
/jg/L).  Based on this rate, 86% of the
phenol removed in the system was biode-
graded and 14% was emitted to the air.
The uncertainty in the rate calculation is
great enough that all of the phenol
removed may be due to biodegradation, as
the coefficient of variation of the bio-
degradation rate varied between 90% and
200%.  The rate for 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,
0.037 * 47% /jg/min-gram biomass, indicates
that approximately 800 /jg/L of this com-
pound could be biodegraded in this system.
The average aeration tank influent concen-
tration (feed plus recycled sludge) was
approximately 1900 /jg/L; aeration tank
effluent concentration was consistently
below the detection limit of 250 /tg/L.
Potential air emissions of 2,4,6-trichlo-
rophenol may be as great as 58% of the
Influent.

    The biodegradation rate for 1,1,1-
trichloroethane was essentially zero.
This compound was detected in the direct
air samples taken with the flux chamber at
1,330 /tg/min, but this was much less than
the mass in the aeration tank influent
(10,000 /*g/L).  The difference is either
due to failure to detect the bio-
degradation of this compound (perhaps by
not continuing the test long enough) or
else to incomplete capture in the flux
chamber.

    A similar calculation for 1,1,1-tri-
chloroethane indicates that most of the
difference in concentration between influ-
ent and effluent could be due to volatili-
zation.

    Water/hiomass solids partition coeffi-
cients are given in Table 3.

CONCLUSIONS

    The results of this field test did not
confirm the suitability of the indirect
air emissions estimation approach.  The
major reason for this was that chemical
limitations prevented, for the most part,
analysis of the same compounds in both the
liquid and gaseous streams.  Direct air
emissions measurements of a number of
compounds were obtained and can be cor-
related with influent concentrations.
Similarly, biodegradation rate estimates
and water/biomass solids partition coeffi-
cients were experimentally obtained for
use in the absence of more accurate site-
specific data.
                                           -482-

-------
              TABLE 1.   TOTAL EMISSIONS  FOR  SELECTED  INDIVIDUAL COMPOUNDS
Total emissions (^g/min)
Compound
Methane
C-2 VOC
Cyclopentane
Isobutene + 1-Butene
t-4-Methyl-2-Pentene •
Toluene
Methyl ene chloride
1,1, 1-Tri chl oroethane
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Dimethyl sul fide
Total Air Flux (mVmin)
Aerated
Zone A
50,000 * 22,600
287 4 236
696 4 555
62.3 4 89.6
105 * 93.2
114 * 1,120
161 * 149
385 ±166
5,480 * 1,930
7.71 * 298
127 * 70.6
18.6
Foam covered
Zone C
263,000 4 50,700
1,800 * 571
1,040 ± 1,520
187 * 220
80.0 * 85.3
6,100 * 10,300
153 * 269
934 * 795
5,350 4 2,320
159 4 874
112 * 78.7
25.4
Non-aerated
Zone NA
2,080 4 11,600
-55.6 * 81.2*
26.8 ± 77.3
-15.5 4 28.3*
•17.7 4 62.4
-630 4 1,780*
-73.3 4 29.9*
10.2 4 44.5
-213 * 262*
-278 4 51.9*
0.00 4 0.0
3.85
Total
Tank
316,000
2,040
1,770
234
202
5,570
241
1,330
10,600
-111*
239 4 124
47.9
*Negative emissions result from correction for blank.
                                         -483-

-------
          TABLE 2.  BIODEGRADATION RATE CONSTANTS
      Compound
       Rate Constant
/jg/(min-g biomass) ± 1 S.D.
Hethanol


Phenol



2,4,6-Tri chlorophenol

Styrene

Oxi rane


1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
      12.8 ± 38 percent
      5.7 ± 54 percent

      0.087 ± 150 percent
      0.25 * 91 percent
      0.29 ± 200 percent

      0.037 * 47 percent

      0.0011 * 123 percent

      0.38 ± 56 percent
      0.59 ± 47 percent
        TABLE 3.   SLUDGE/WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENTS
Recycle
Compound [(/ig/kg)/(/*g/L)]
Methyl ene chloride
Oxi rane
2-Propanone
2-Propanol
1 , 3-Di oxo 1 ane-2-methanol
Dimethyl disulfide
140
170
160
170
170
150
Effluent
[(/KJ/kg)/(/KJ/L)]
NM
69
57
130
140
NM
      Not meaningful  (samples below detection level).
                           -484-

-------
.-485-

-------
                        Nonaerated Zone
                           7
    1" = 4'
                      Zone C (Foam-covered Area)


     Zone A (Above Aeration Jet)

                   Figure 2. Aeration tank zone designations.
   10
   8.


3  '
,§ fi-

ll  '


o  -

   2-
                                                    S
                                                    800
Last bottle vented
at this point
                200
                            400
                                        600
                                                                1000
                               Time (minutes)
 Figure 3.  Concentration of phenol in  biodegradation rate  test samples.
                                   -486-

-------
       PILOT-SCALE EVALUATION OF A THIN-FILM EVAPORATOR FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC REMOVAL
                               FROM LAND TREATMENT SLUDGES
                 Coleen M.  Northeim,  C.  Clark Allen,  and Scott M.  Harkins

                              •  Research Triangle Institute
                                      P. 0.  Box 12194          '   .   ,•    .
                       Research  Triangle Park,  North  Carolina  27709
                             	     ABSTRACT  ,•        • •,••_-   •- , •

 _    The  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency  Office  of Air Quality  Planning and Standards
 is  currently  developing  regulations to control  air emissions  from waste treatment,  stor-
 age,  and disposal  facilities.   In  support  of  this  regulatory  development effort,  the
 Research Triangle  Institute has conducted  a study  of thin-film evaporators  (TFE)  for
 removing volatile  organics,(V,0)  from refinery wastes.  Jhin-film evaporators were studied
 to  evaluate their  use  to remove and recover VO  from  waste  petroleum sludges prior to  land
 treatment.  This would reduce  the  amount of VO  available for  release  to the atmosphere
 during land treatment  of the sludges.                               '

     The  treatment  of two refinery  sludges  was investigated in a  pilot-scale agitated  TFE.
 The fraction  of feed removed by the TFE ranged  from  11  to  95.7 percent.   At the greatest
 overhead fraction, more  than 99.9  percent  of  the VO  and 75 percent  of the semi volatile
 compounds were removed from the sludge.  At the lowest  overhead  fraction, greater than
 98.5  percent  of the VO and  10  to 43 percent of  the semivolatiles were removed from the
 sludge.  The  sludge processed  with the lowest overhead  fraction  contained water and
 maintained suitable handling characteristics  for land  treatment.
INTRODUCTION

    The TFE test was conducted at Luwa
Corporation in Charlotte, NC, during the
week of September 8-12, 1986.  Due to
regulatory constraints, the wastes that
were tested were npnhazardous (as defined
by RCRA) refinery wastes..  These wastes
were selected based on'their similarity to
hazardous refinery, wastes, such as API
separator sludge (hazardous waste code
K051), that are currently land-treated:

    The use of TFEs was Investigated to
determine if VO can be removed and
recovered from waste petroleum sludges
prior to land treatment of Jthe/sludge.
This would reduce the amount of VO avail-
able for release to the atmosphere during
land treatment, of the sludges.  The VO
would be recovered as an organic conden-
sate and recycled to petroleum refineries
as product.  In addition to VO removal,
the process can also be operated to remove
water and low boiling oils from sludges,
reducing s.ludge volume while recovering
oil from sludges prior to disposal.  These
benefits are not limited to sludges dis-
posed of by land treatment.
                                          -487-

-------
THIN-FILM EVAPORATION

    Agitated TFEs are designed to spread a
thin layer of viscous liquids or sludges
on one side of a metallic surface with
heat supplied to the other side.  This
promotes the transfer of heat to the
material while simultaneously exposing a
large surface for evaporation of volatile
compounds.  Heat can be supplied by either
steam or heated oil; heated oils are used
to heat the waste to temperatures higher
than can be achieved with saturated steam.
Volatile constituents separate from the
feed liquid or sludge, producing a vapor
stream of volatiles and leaving a treated
waste which flows out of the bottom of the
evaporator.  Vapors can be condensed and
recovered.

    The unique feature of this equipment
is not the thin film itself  (falling- and
rising-film evaporators use thin liquid
layers), but rather the mechanical agi-
tator device for producing and agitating
the film.  This mechanical agitator per-
mits the processing of high-viscosity
liquids and sludges with suspended solids.
The agitation at the heat transfer surface
not only promotes heat transfer but also
maintains precipitated or crystallized
solids in manageable suspension without
fouling the heat transfer surface.

    With typical tip speeds of 900 to
1,200 cm/s  (30 to 40 ft/s), centrifugal
forces distribute the feed as a thin film
on the heated cylinder wall, and the wave
action produced by the rotating blades
provides rapid mixing and frequent surface
regeneration of the thin liquid layer on
the transfer surface.  A typical vertical
thin-film evaporator is illustrated  in
Figure  1.

PILOT  FACILITY AND TEST

    The tests were conducted at the  pilot
facility of Luwa  Corporation,  Charlotte,
NC.  This  facility contains  a variety of
evaporators produced by  the  company  and is
used to test potential  applications  of
their  equipment  for  clients.   The  equip-
ment used  for the tests  was  judged most
suitable for our applications.   Samples of
tank bottoms sludges were  obtained from an
oil  refinery,  tested  in  the equipment,  and
then returned  to  the  refinery for normal
disposal.
  Drive
  System
                              Rotor
   Heating Medium (=
   Modular Heating t_
       Bodies
                Product Outlet
    Figure 1. Luwa vertical thin-film evaporator.


    Figure 2 shows the equipment Used in
the pilot-scale tests.  The 100-gal  feed
tank was agitated with both an axial ntixer
and continuous recirculation of the feed
liquid through a centrifugal pump.  A
positive displacement pump was used to
pump the feed sludge through the preheater
and into the top of the TFE.  There, the
sludge was continuously spread over the
heated surface of the TFE.  Unevaporated
material flowed down through the TFE to a
collection pot at the base.  Materials
evaporating in the TFE passed through an
empty demister and were condensed in a
condenser that was cooled with cooling
tower water.  Condensate flowed from the
condenser and was collected directly into
liquid sample jars or a flask used for
measuring condensate volumes.  Any uncon-
densed vapors flowed from the condenser
through a wet testmeter for flow measure-
ment.
                                           -488-

-------
                         s 'fiitt
                         «> S o o §
                         « U. 00 O>
                           U. CO
                                  OJ
                                  3

                                  .5*
                                  iff



                                  I
                                  £

                                  3
                                  O)
-489-

-------
    The TFE was heated by hot oil,
although steam could be used for lower
temperatures.  Entrainment separators are
used frequently with TFEs to remove en-
trained liquids from the vapors flowing to
the condenser.  The entrainment separator
was empty (but heated) during the testing,
and very little material condensed there.
Five feed lines from the preheater to the
TFE were heated with low-pressure steam,
as were the vapor lines from the TFE
through the entrainment separator and to
the condenser.

    A total of 22 runs were performed with
the TFE, using two  different wastes, three
temperatures, three flow rates, and  under
both atmospheric and vacuum operation.
The feed rates and  temperatures were
chosen  to operate the  TFE  over its normal
range of operation  and to  demonstrate  the
removal of  VO compounds  from the  feed
sludges.  Tests  1 through  18 used five
55-gal  drums  of  an  emulsion  tank  sludge
while tests 19 through 22  were performed
on oily tank bottoms.   The process test-
ing, sampling, and  analysis  concentrated
on the  tests using  the first waste while
the second  waste was  used  to gather  addi-
tional  process data and demonstrate  proc-
ess operation on a  second  waste  sludge.

     Matrices indicating operating condi-
tions  and run numbers for the  tests  are
shown  in  Table 1.   This test plan studied
the two major variables affecting TFE
performance,  the temperature of the  heat-
 Ing jacket and the  feed rate.   The indi-
 cated  flows and temperatures were the
 nominal process  parameters during the
 tests  and the actual  measured  parameters
 varied somewhat from these values.  Runs
 5, 6,  and 7 were a  series of tests at a
 constant  heating jacket temperature
 (150 *C)  at three different feed rates.
 Runs 8, 9,  and 10 were conducted at simi-
 lar flow rates to Runs 5,  6, and 7 but
 were at a much higher heating jacket tem-
 perature (310 •C).   Runs 14, 15,  and 16
 were conducted at an intermediate tempera-
 ture (230 *C) and were limited to the two
 lower flow rates.  Runs 1-4, 12, and 13
 were used as shakedown runs.  These runs
 allowed practice samples to be taken and
 potential problems to be solved before the
 samples to be analyzed were taken.

     Three vacuum runs were performed wi th
 the first waste sludge during Runs  11,  17,
,     18.   The  purpose  of these  runs was to
 examine  the effect  of vacuum operation on
 the removal of VO compounds  from the  feed
 waste.   The final four runs  (19,  20,  21,
 and 22)  were  performed with  the second
 waste.   These tests were principally  to
 demonstrate the operation of the TFE  with
 a second waste sample and were not  exten-
 sively sampled and  analyzed  during  the
 project.

     Four of the tests (5, 7, 8, and 10)
 were selected for extensive  sampling  and
 analysis of process streams.  These four
 runs allowed the process to.be examined
 with both  high and low feed rates and at
 both high  and low heating temperatures.
 They represent the range of reasonable
 operating  conditions for the TFE process-
 ing waste  sludges for the removal of vola-
 tiles, water, and oils from the sludge.

 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

     Samples were taken to characterize the
 wastes  treated during  the pilot studies
 and to  determine the  efficiency of the TFE
 process.   Four process  streams were ,
 sampled:   feed,  bottoms, condensate, and
 condenser  vent gas.   The procedures  for
 obtaining  these  samples  are outlined in a
 specific test  and  quality assurance  plan.
 In all  cases,  special  precautions were
 taken to obtain  representative samples and
 to prevent the  loss  of VO from the samples
 prior to analyses.

     Sample analysis  was  performed onsite
 by RTI  and offsite by contract labora-
 tories. The onsite  measurements performed
 by RTI  were:   (1)  the analysis of head-
  space concentrations of VO  from feed
  sludge  samples  and bottoms  samples and
  (2) the measurement  of vent gas flow rates
  and overall  VO concentrations in the vent
  gas and bottoms  collection  pot.  Two types
  of analyses  for headspace concentrations
  of VO were employed.  The first used
  syringes to  transfer gas samples from
  half-filled  sample bottles  and a portable
  GC to measure the  concentrations of  VO in
  air above  the samples.  The second method
  of measuring the headspace  concentrations
  of VO used a calibrated total hydrocarbon
  analyzer.   This instrument  was a Bacharach
  TLV Sniffer that pulls a continuous  sample
  that is continuously oxidized by a
  catalyst-coated resistance element.   The
  resistance of this element varies  with
                                           -490-

-------
               TABLE 1.   THIN-FILM EVAPORATOR TEST PLAN
                   Feed No.  1,  Emulsion Tank Bottoms
Flow Rate  (Ib/hr)
          Temperature  (*C)
 150           230               310
        70
       100
       150
Run 5
Run 6
Run 7
Run 14
Run 15
Run 16
Run 8
Run 9
Run 10
                     Feed No. 2, 01ly Tank Bottoms
Flow Rate (Ib/hr)
 150
                                          Temperature  (*C)
                                                                 310
        45
        80
Run 21
Run 22
                 Run 19
                 Run 20
                                -491-

-------
temperature, which is in turn proportional
to the hydrocarbon concentration of the
analyzed gas.  These measurements were
Intended to be a rough analysis of head-
space concentrations and to confirm the
results from GC analysis.  The Bacharach
TLV Sniffer had a maximum measurable con-
centration of 10,000 ppm.  This limit was
exceeded in the headspace of all of the
feed samples.

    The Bacharach TLV was also used to
measure concentrations of organics in the
vent gas, feed tank headspace, and vapors
above the bottoms when the sample pot was
removed from the TFE.  Measured organic
concentration of the vent gas and feed
tank headspace also exceeded the range of
the instrument.

    Samples of the TFE feed, bottoms, and
condensate from selected tests were ana-
lyzed by a contract laboratory for vola-
tile and semivolatile organics; percent
oil, solids, and water; and metals using
the EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).
The purpose of these analyses was to
evaluate the process effectiveness on an
Individual component basis and to obtain
Information to calculate a material bal-
ance around the TFE.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    The feed rate and temperature of the
TFE were varied over its normal range with
no observed operational problems when
operated at atmospheric pressure with the
tested sludges. There were difficulties
when it was operated under vacuum at 320
*C, as some carryover of feed  into the
condensate was observed.  The  condensate
from the vacuum runs was a milky-white
emulsion, which would require  additional
treatment to separate the oils.

    When the TFE  was operated  at the  150
*C, some of the water  in the feed was
evaporated  along  with most  of the VO.   As
illustrated in Table 2,  the  VO removals
ranged between 99.5 and 99.8 percent  at
the low  feed rate and  decreased slightly
when  the  feed  rate was  increased  (98.6  to
99.8  percent at  a feed  rate  of 154  Ib/h).
The bottoms temperatures  for these  runs
were  98  to  102 *C,  indicating that  water
was still  boiling from the  bottoms  as  it
exited the  base  of the TFE.
    The removal efficiency for volatiles
was greater when the TFE was operated at
higher temperatures.  The VO removals when
the TFE was operated at 320 *C were 99.88
to 99.99 percent, with no clear trends
relative to changes in feed rate.  These
runs removed essentially all of the water
and VO from the feed sludge, along with
much of the higher boiling oils.  The
amount of bottoms sludge produced ranged
between 10 and 13 percent of the feed
rate, substantially reducing the amount of
material requiring disposal.  This bottoms
product was a relatively viscous, high
solids content sludge, which was still
pumpable.

    Several vacuum runs were performed
with the TFE.  These runs produced a
milky-white emulsion as condensate, which
contrasted substantially with the cleanly
separating organic/aqueous condensate of
the atmospheric pressure runs.  A high-
temperature vacuum run (320 °C) produced a
bottoms product that was only 4.3 percent
of the feed sludge.  This indicates that a
two-stage process  (first-stage removal of
water and volatiles at atmospheric pres-
sure, second-stage removal of heavier oils
under vacuum operation at high tempera-
ture) could be employed to reduce substan-
tially the amount of sludge material
requiring disposal.

    Metals in  the  feed sludge appeared to
remain in the  bottoms products.  Only
minor amounts  of metals were found in the
organic  condensate.

    The  organic  condensates produced  dur-
ing the  atmospheric pressure tests could
easily be recycled  as raw products to the
refinery operation. This would  reduce the
actual operating costs of the  TFE while
removing organics  from the  wastes prior to
disposal.  The aqueous condensate was
water  saturated  with  the  recovered organ-
ics  and  could  be sent to  existing waste-
water  treatment  facilities  at  refineries.
If the  process is  applied  for  the  removal
of volatiles only,  the aqueous  condensate
could  be recycled  to  the  process feed,  so
that  all water would  exit  with  the process
bottoms.  (This  would not  be practical  if
 large  quantities of water were condensed,
as in  high-temperature operation)  The
bottoms  sludge produced  by the process
could  be treated by existing methods  (land
treatment)  or  perhaps incinerated.   The
                                          -492-

-------
                       TABLE  2.   TFE  VO  REMOVAL  FOR SELECTED  COMPOUNDS
Operating Conditions

Test
No.
5
7
8
10

Temperature
Cc)
150
150
310
310
Flow
rate
Ob/hr)
71.6
153.7
68.5
143.4
Reduction in concentrations from feed (%)a


Benzene Toluene Ethyl benzene
99.58 99.61 99.48
99.73 99.78 98.83
99.72 99.84 99.68
99.76 99.90 99.78


m-Xyl ene
99.54
98.64
99.67
99.75
aBased on GC/MS analyses.
                                         -493-

-------
 ultimate treatment for any bottoms product
 will require additional testing of pos-
 sible disposal methods.

     The results from this test were used
 to verify a model that can be used to
 predict the effectiveness of TFE treatment
 on different waste sludges.  Generally, a
 TFE 1s modeled as a one theoretical stage
 separation device.  Countercurrent steam
 purging is thought to  improve the separa-
 tion to approximately  one and one half
 theoretical stages.  The number of
 theoretical stages, together with the
 partition coefficient  (K) of the volatile
 organic component at the TFE operating
 temperatures, and the  flow rates can be
 used to predict the percent removal of
 volatile organics from the sludge in a
• treatment device.  For a complete discus-
 sion of the TFE model  and the pilot test,
 the reader is referred to Harkins, Allen,
 and Northeim  (1987)  (1).

 CONCLUSIONS

     The TFE was  found  to have very high
 removal efficiencies of VO compounds from
 the waste sludges tested.  In each of
 three  methods used to  assess the  reduction
 of volatiles  (two headspace analyses,  one
 analysis of VO compounds in feed  and bot-
 toms), the removal efficiencies for VO
 compounds were greater than 99 percent.

 REFERENCE

 1. Harkins,  S.  M.,  C. C. Allen,  and C. M.
     Northeim, 1987.  Pilot-Scale
     Evaluation of a  Thin-Film  Evaporator
     ?or Volatile Organic Removal  from  Land
     Treatment Sludges. U.S.  Environmental
      Protection Agency, Hazardous  Waste
      Engineering  Research  Laboratory,
     Alternatives Technology Division.
      (Draft.   Prepared  by the  Research
     Triangle  Institute under  EPA  Contract
      No.  68-02-3253,  Work Assignment  1-6.)
                                            -494-

-------
                           U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY DATA BASE

                                        C. S. Fore
                       DOE Hazardous Waste Remedial Actions Program
                               Oak  Ridge  National  Laboratory
                                    Oak Ridge, TN  37831

                                      P.  H. Dalfonso
                              Automated Sciences Group,  Inc.
                                    Oak Ridge, TN  37830

                                         C. C. Lee
                           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                     Hazardous Waste  Engineering  Research  Laboratory
                                   Cincinnati,  OH 45268
                                         ABSTRACT
    The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Hazardous Waste Control
Technology Data Base was developed by
the U.S. Department of Energy's
Hazardous Waste Remedial Actions Program
through a joint interagency agreement
with EPA's Hazardous Waste Engineering
Research Laboratory.  The data base
functions as an information resource on
thermal treatment technology for
handling hazardous wastes.  It serves as
a multifunctional information tool to
support permit writers, researchers,
private industry, and decision makers in
managing, analyzing, and comparing
similar waste components and
technologies.  The features of the data
base incorporate (1) engineering data on
permit applications for existing, new,
and research development and
demonstration facilities; (2) trial burn
and design data; (3) on-line report
generation capabilities; and (4) methods
for conducting similarity analyses.
 Interactive menu-driven retrieval
 options have been designed to generate
 summary reports through selection of key
 parameters.  The data base can be used
 to conduct similarity analyses of the
 data for (1) re-evaluating the
 technology data to compare with actual
 industry performance and operating
 conditions, (2) providing a reference
 guide to meet new and existing
 regulatory standards, and (3) providing
 a means of calculating the theoretical
 performance of trial burns.  Overall,
 the data base functions as a means of
 tracking the status of permit
 applications,  assists the decision
makers in determining future, research
 strategies, provides support data for
public hearings on permit decisions, and
 supports EPA's regulatory standards and
procedures.  The scope of the data base
 is being expanded to incorporate
technical  data on chemical, physical,
and biological  treatment technologies.
                                          -495-

-------
         ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FROM THE GATEWAY NATIONAL RECREATION
                          AREA  AT  JAMAICA BAY, NY

                              David G. Olson
                             NUS  Corporation
                             Edison, NJ 08837

                      Uwe Frank and Michael  Gruenfeld
           USEPA Hazardous Waste Engineering Research  Laboratory
                             Edison, NJ 08837

                              John Tanacredi
                           National Park Service
                                Brooklyn, NY
The National Park Service (NPS)
provided the Releases Control Branch
(RCB) of the Hazardous Waste
Engineering Research Laboratory with
funding to perform a preliminary study
of chemical pollutants entering the
Jamaica Bay ecosystem at several
designated sites near municipal
landfills in Brooklyn, NY.  The NPS
needs this information to make an
initial assessment of whether these
landfills are potential contributing
sources of pollution.  The landfills
will eventually be reclaimed by NPS as
part of the Gateway National
Recreation Area park system.

Bay samples were screened for the
presence of priority pollutants.
These samples were collected by NPS
personnel at several sites near the
landfills along the north shore of
Jamaica Bay, NY and analyzed according
to the requirements in 40 CFR Part  136
(Guidelines Establishing Test
Procedures for the Analysis  of
Pollutants under the Clean Water Act:
Final Rule and Interim Final Rule and
Proposed Rule).  The resulting  data
will  be presented  in this poster.   In
addition,  the  poster presents
designated sampling sites on the bay
and  demonstrates the  impact  of
pollution  on  the surrounding
communities.
In the first part of the study (March
1985), appreciable concentrations  of
pollutants were found at the following
levels:  base/neutral and acid
extractables (BNAs) 8-42 ppb (water),
300-9800 ppb (soil); polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) 1.74  ppb
(one water sample), 55.9-3515 ppb
(soil); polychlorinated biphenyl
(PCBs) aroclor 1260 5.45-43.2 ppb
(soil); metals 0.11-6.41 ppm (water),
0.42-125 ppm (soil).

In the second part of the study
(May-June 1986), appreciable amounts
of base/neutral and acid extractables
(BNAs) and metals were found in the
landfill sediment samples, with the
following ranges of maximum values:
495-6,740 ppb BNAs, 2.4-910 ppm
metals.  Aroclor 1260 was the only
polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) found
in any of the samples (88.4 ppb in bay
water  and 128 ppb  in sediment).
Polynuclear  aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs) were  found  in both the bay
water  and sediment  samples  (5.16 ppb
maximum); landfill  samples were not
analyzed for PAHs.   In  order to
evaluate and document the quality of
the  analytical  data  generated, an
extensive internal  QA/QC program was
followed, which will also be described
in this poster.
                                       -496-

-------
                       CASE EVALUATIONS OF RD&D PERMIT APPLICATIONS


                                            By


                             W. Clark, P.M. Maly, W.R. Seeker

                       Energy  and  Environmental  Research Corporation

                                         18 Mason

                                Irvine, California  92718


                                           And

                                         C.C.  Lee

                           U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency

                                26 West Saint  Clair Street

                                  Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
     The Environmental Protection Agency
 (EPA) is charged with regulating the in-
 cineration of hazardous waste under the
 Resources Conservation and Recovery Act
 (RCRA).  Under current procedures the
 regional permit writer must make a number
 of engineering assessments during the
 course of the permit application concern-
 ing the adequacy of the design data, the
 consistency of the trial burn data, the
 appropriate limits to be set on operating
 conditions, and the parameters to be moni-
 tored to ensure continual compliance.  A
 computer model has been developed to
 assessments, allowing them to perform fast
 and accurate energy and mass balance cal-
 culations for hazardous waste incinera-
 tors based on sound engineering principles.
The mass balance is based on simple
 stoichiometric calculations assuming com-
plete combustion.  The energy balance
 solves for gas temperature, wall  temper-
ature, and shell  temperature considering
chemical heat, heat of vaporization, sen-
sible heat, radiation, convection,  and
conduction,  this procedure can be useful
to incinerator designers and operators
and especially to permit writers.  Permit
writers can use the procedure to evaluate
the feasibility of incinerator designs
and concepts, to issue research, develop-
ment and demonstration (RD&D) or con-
struction permits and to evaluate the
consistency of trial burn measurements
and set appropriate operating limits on
the basis of those measurements for op-
erating permist of hazardous waste incin-
erators.  The procedure has been used to
evaluate an actual RD&D permit application
by Waste-Tech Services, Inc. for a fluid-
ized bed incineration system.  The in-
cinerator is predicted to be capable of
achieving the times, temperatures, and
velocities claimed in the permit applica-
tion, and incinerator performance is
predicted to be most sensitive to changes
in air flow; waste feed,  waste heating
value, and auxiliary fuel flow.
                                          -497-

-------
              OVERVIEW:   EPA's  MOBILE  INCINERATION  SYSTEM  AND
                        TRANSPORTABLE INCINERATION

              A. C. Gangadharan,  H.  Mortensen,  and  A.  Sherman
                            Enviresponse, Inc.
                           Livingston, NO  07039

                         F. Freestone  and J.  Yezzi
           USEPA Hazardous Waste Engineering  Research  Laboratory
                             Edison,  NJ  08837
Over the past five years, the EPA
mobile incineration system has been
successfully tested using
PCB-contarainated liquids and
dioxin-contaminated liquids and
solids.  A field demonstration on a
variety of dioxin-contaminated liquids
and solids was conducted between July
1985 and February 1986.  A total of
2,000,000 Ib of solids and 180,000 Ib
of liquids were successfully
decontaminated during that time.
Subsequently, four design
modifications have been made to
improve throughput capacity and
availability.

The modifications include changes to
the ram feed system, the addition of
an oxygen enrichment system in the
kiln,  installation of a cyclone
between the kiln, and secondary
combustion chamber (SCO, and
installation of a wet electrostatic
precipitator downstream of the SCC.
Key design features of these
modifications and their potential
benefit to performance and operating
costs will be discussed.  Updated
operational data will be presented as
available.

This presentation will also discuss
conceptual configurations of a
transportable incineration system  that
has a thermal duty of 75 million
Btu/hr.  Cost estimates of a
truck-mounted transportable
incineration system will be described.
                                       -498-

-------
                     BOILER COFIRING OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS
                                    John H. Wasser
                    Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
                         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                           Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                       ABSTRACT
An in-house project to study the destruc-
tion of liquid hazardous waste by cofiring
in an industrial package boiler has recently
been completed.  The test facility
consisted of a 2.5 million Btu per hour
North American Scotch Marine boiler, a
surrogate hazardous liquid feed system, a
mini-VOST sampling train, and a continuous
emissions monitoring system (CEMS).
Hazardous wastes were simulated by mixing
NO. 2 fuel oil with carbon tetrachloride,
monochlorobenzene, and perch!oroethylene.
Each of these principal organic hazardous
compound (POHC) surrogates constituted 2%
by weight of the mixture.  This mixture
was cofired with natural gas in the
boiler.  The overall program objective
was to define the envelope of operating
conditions where a 99.99% or greater
destruction and removal efficiency (ORE)
could be achieved for the POHC.  Waste
surrogate and fuel (natural gas) were
cofi red under both steady state and
transient conditions.  Boiler load,
stoichiometry, waste heat percent, and
degree of atomization were varied under
steady state conditions, while load ramp
up/down, stoichiometric fluctuations, and
waste feed rate fluctuations were the
parameters evaluated under transient
conditions.  Stack emissions of NOX, CO,
HC, and oxygen were measured by CEMS,
while chlorinated POHCs were sampled with
the mini-VOST train and analyzed  using a
GC (Hall detector).  Samples of the waste
mixture and internal boiler deposits were
also collected.  Indications from the
results are that less than 99.99% DRE was
experienced with a boiler stoichiometry
near 1.0, a high firing rate (80%), and
50% waste heat input under both good and
bad atomization Conditions.  A DRE less
than 99.99% resulted under transient con-
ditions of load ramp up/down, stoichio-
metry fluctuation, and waste feed rate
fluctuation.  Monochlorobenzene is the
most difficult of the tested compounds to
destroy, indicating that aromatic chloro-
hydrocarbons could be the major concern
in cofiring.  Steady, moderate boiler
operating conditions give the best
assurance of maintaining 99.99% DRE.
                                          -499-

-------
           DEMONSTRATION, TESTING, AND EVALUATION OF COMMERICAL
                    TECHNOLOGIES UNDER THE SITE PROGRAM

                             Seymour Rosenthal
                         Enviresponse,  Incorporated
                           Livingston, NJ  07039

                                M.  Stinson
           USEPA Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                              Edison,  NJ  08837
The Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program provides a
mechanism by which the US EPA can
cooperate with the private sector in
maximizing the use of innovative
remediation technologies.

The SITE Program provides certain
support and financial assistance for
the development and demonstration of
promising technologies, thus enhancing
their establishment and availability.
The-poster describes some technologies
currently being examined under the
program.  They include:  the
International Waste Technologies
solidification process, which will be
demonstrated on PCB-contaminated soil
in Hialeah, Florida; the Westinghouse
plasma arc process that will be tested
at Love Canal; and the Shirco
incinerator planned for a
demonstration at Tampa, Florida.
                                       -500-

-------
                        CONDITIONS WHICH ENHANCE BIODEGRADATION OF
                           ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY WHITE ROT FUNGI
                          T. Fernando, J. A. Bumpus, S.  D.  Aust
                                Department of Biochemistry
                                Michigan State University
                              East Lansing, Michigan  48824
                                          ABSTRACT
     The white rot fungus Phanerochaete
chrysosporium is able to degrade a broad
spectrum of typically hard-to-degrade
environmental pollutants.  The present
study focused on culture conditions that
enhance the mineralization of environmental
pollutants.  Special attention was given to
the use of inexpensive carbohydrate sources
to develop a useful and economically prac-
tical waste treatment system.  The initial
rate of mineralization of ^^C-DDT, which
was used as a model organopollutant, was
  Unear (i.e., first order) with respect to
  C-DDT concentration.  Cultures containing
one percent glucose, starch, or cellulose
mineralized 14.5%, 25.1%, and 32.1%,
respectively, of the 14C-DDT during a 90
day incubation period.  No significant
difference in the initial rate of 14C-DDT
mineralization was observed.  However,
mineralization was minimal after 18 days of
growth on glucose, but continued at sub-
stantial rates in cultures in which cellu-
lose or starch served as the carbohydrate
source.  Cultures grown on used newspaper,
wheat straw, or corn cobs mineralized 8.1%,
13.3%, and 8.2%, respectively, of the 14C-
DDT during 30 days of incubation.  In other
studies it was shown that 42% of the 14C-
DDT initially present was mineralized in 60
days in culture in a medium composed of
(1:7.5 w/v) horse manure liquor, 8% cellu-
lose and ,2.5% glucose.  The rate and extent
of 14C-DDT mineralization was also found to
be affected by the concentration of trace
minerals.  For example, a twenty-fold in-
crease (from 0.004 uM to 0.08 uM) in the
concentration of FeS04 resulted in a two-
fold increase in the amount of 14C-DDT
mineralized.  Similar effects were observed
when the concentrations of CuS04, ZnS04,
and MnSOd. were varied.  These studies dem-
onstrated that it is possible to substan-
tially increase the rate and extent of
xenobiotic degradation by P^_  chrysosporium.
They further suggest that it may be possible
to develop an efficient and economical
waste treatment system based on the use of
this microorganism.  (Supported by USEPA
Cooperative Agreement CR811464).
                                          -501-

-------
                  DEMONSTRATION AND EVALUATION OF THE EPA
                         MOBILE CARBON REGENERATOR

                      Patricia Brown and H. Mortensen

                            Enviresponse,  Inc.
                           Livingston, NJ  07039

                                 R. Traver
           USEPA Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                              Edison,  NJ  08837
This poster presents information on
the EPA Mobile Carbon Regenerator,
which was developed as part of EPA's
overall mission to actively encourage
the use of cost-effective, advanced
technologies during cleanup
operations.  Specifically, the
regenerator is intended to provide
on-slte reactivation of granular
activated carbon (GAC) used to adsorb
contaminants at Superfund sites.  The
regenerator consists of a rotary kiln
with afterburner, scrubber, and
auxiliary equipment mounted on a
serai-trailer, and is capable of
regenerating up to 100 Ib/hr (dry
basis) of carbon.
Automated feed- and product- handling
systems were added during the current
phase of system development.

Most recently, the regenerator was.run
in a demonstration operation using GAC
from the Stringfellow hazardous waste
site, Riverside County, CA.  Results
of this operation are presented,
together with the results of a
previous operation using GAC spiked
with tetrachloroethylene and with
ortho-dichlorobenzene.
                                      -502-

-------
                          PRETREATMENT OF LAND-TREATED WASTES
                               William E. Gallagher* PE
                            Thomas C. Ponder, Jr., PE, CCE
                                   Joseph B. Murray
                                 PEI Associates, Inc.
                                Arlington, Texas 76012
                                       ABSTRACT
     The purpose of this project is to
investigate hazardous waste dewatering
at petroleum refineries to evaluate
air emissions associated with this
pretreatment operation.  Refineries
routinely dewater.API sludges and dis-
solved air flotation (DAF) float prior
to disposing of this material.  The
sludge from these dewatering opera-
tions is a listed hazardous waste and
is typically either land-treated or
disposed of in a hazardous waste dis-
posal facility.

     Specifically, this project deter-
mined the fate of both semivolatile
and volatile organic carbon during the
dewatering operation.  By reviewing
existing data, the different types of
dewatering equipment used in this
operation were identified.  Sev-
eral refineries were visited and a re-
finery using a belt filter press was
selected for testing.  The refinery
processed API and DAF sludge separate-
ly (most refineries mix these sludges
prior to dewatering).  The facility
had a forced draft ventilation system
which made it possible to test air
emissions  from  the  belt  filter  through
an  exhaust stack.         .-.-•,

      Two, days of testing.were conducted,
;one day,while API sludge was  being,
processed  and a second day  while  DAT
float was  being dewatered.  Each  test
ran for  six hours.   During  the  test,
inlet and  outlet streams to,the filter
were measured and sampled hourly  along
with testing to quantify volatile arid
semi-volatile organics.in the air", ,
:vented from the filter, building.

      The samples were analyzed,  for 13
specific organic compounds, as  well as
purgible and non-purgible organic,car-
bon. Solid, oil  and water  content of
each stream was also analyzed.  Data
taken during the test were  used to
quantify the flows  in and out of  the
filter,  and a material balance was done
as  a cross-check on the  accuracy  of our
data.  The results  of the sampling and
analysis effort were used to  determine
the fate of the organics and  determine
the level  of air emissions  generated
from this  type  of operation.
                                         -503-

-------
                    GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS FOR REVIEW OF DIKE STABILITY

                 R.M. McCandless, A. Bodocsi, P. Cluxton and M.S. Meyers
                    Department of Civil and Enrivonmental Engineering
                                 University of Cincinnati
                                 Cincinnati,  Ohio  45221
                                         ABSTRACT
     The structure and capabilities of a
user-friendly, interactive computer pro-
gram developed for the stability analysis
of dikes (CARDS) are described.  The CARDS
program is designed to guide the geotechni-
cal user through the customary steps of
earth dike analysis.  The significant
difference between CARDS and other stabil-
ity programs commonly available is the
opportunity to perform all of the follow-
ing analyses in a single package:  automa-
tic search to determine the critical fail-
ure surface for both rotational (slip-cir-
cle) and trans!ational (wedge) stability
analyses; automatic search to locate zones
of greatest liquefaction potential  and to
compute total and differential settlements
of foundation soils; finite element hydrau-
lic analysis to determine the steady state
piezometric surface through the section
(including the case of an impermeable
barrier such as a clay liner); evaluation
of excess pore pressure conditions pro-
duced by confined steady state flow and
potential slope stability and uplift con-
ditions resulting therefrom; determine the
maximum exit gradient and the potential
for piping failure.

     The program was developed under the
the sponsorship of the U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency and therefore emphasize^
hazardous waste applications although it
is suitable for general use.  The GARDS
package is designed for use on the IBM/PC/
XT microcomputer.  Documentation consists
of a technical users maunal  which presents
basic theory, program operational proce-
dures, and example computer solutions.
                                          -504-

-------
                             LAND BAN DATA NEEDS

                               Ronald J*  Turner
                               TDB, ATDj  HWERL
                     U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency
                           Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
                                   ABSTRACT
     All of the RCRA hazardous wastes
listed as of November 8, 1984 were
ranked by their intrinsic hazards and
their volumes, and a time frame was
established for conditional  land dis-
posal restrictions.  The EPA will
obtain datel on the operation and per-
formance of demonstrated, available
treatment technologies for these
hazardous wastes.  The HWERL sampling
and analysis program is described.
                                     -505-

-------
                    DEMONSTRATE COMPUTER ASSISTED ENGINEERING (CAE)
                       TECHNIQUES. FOR REMEDIAL ACTION ASSESSMENT

                                   Phillip R. Cluxton
                   Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
                                University of Cincinnati
                                Cincinnati,  Ohio  45221
                                        ABSTRACT

     Computer Assisted Engineering (CAE)
refers to a broad range of powerful soft-
ware tool packages which aid engineers
primarily in the fields of machine design,
microelectronic circuit design and struc-
tural design.  Since powerful personal
computers are becoming widely available,  ,
CAE systems using these computers are
being developed to assist with many other
types of engineering problems.
     A CAE system customized for remedial
action assessment will  be developed by
integrating several  existing software
packages, including a Computer Aided
Design/Drafting (CADD)  package, a Geo-
graphic Information System (GIS), and a
groundwater modeling package.  The result-
ing system will be demonstrated by applying
it to evaluation of remedial action
alternatives at a Superfund site. ,
                                            -506-

-------
                   HAZARDOUS WASTE RESIDUALS CHARACTERIZATION
                                 H. Paul  Warner
                Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                      U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
                            Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
     The Office of Solid Waste and •
Emergency Response is establishing
regulations for the disposal of waste
or residue into the land.  In the
development of these regulations, an
evaluation of several hazardous waste
treatment techniques was made at se-
lected field sites.  This presentation
summarizes the results of these eval-
uations with respect to the character-
ization of treatment residuals and
their suitability for disposal to the
land.  Included in this presentation,
where data is available, is a summary
of the results from the application of
the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedures (TCLP) on treatment resid-
ual s.  Also discussed will  be the
Paint Filter Test and Liquid Release
Test, however, primary emphasis will
be placed on a discussion of the TCLP.
The TCLP, the Paint Filter Test, and
the Liquid Release Test are three
criteria proposed to be used by the
U.S. Enviromental Protection Agency
to regulate disposal of hazardous
waste residuals to the land on a
pass/fail basis.
                                     -507-

-------
         COST ENGINEERING MODELS FOR REMEDIAL RESPONSE TECHNOLOGIES

                 William Kemner, John Abraham, Jay Palmisano
                            PEI Associates, Inc.
                           Cincinnati, Ohio  45246
                                  ABSTRACT
     The purpose of this project was
to develop a cost estimation model
for remediation technologies at
hazardous waste sites.  The work was
conducted for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Hazardous
Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
in cooperation with the Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response.  The
model is designed for operation on a
personal computer and can provide
levels of detail in the estimate
commensurate with the detail of input
parameters available, i.e., the, stage
of design.

     The cost estimation model takes
into account variations in site
characteristics, waste quantities,
worker safety requirements, and
regional costs.  Output formats and
types of cost calculations are con-
sistent with the EPA Remedial Action
Costing Procedures Manual.  Default
values for interest rates, discount
rates, planned life, contingency,
allowances, etc. are consistent with
the costing procedures manual.

     The model can be used by Federal
or State government and contractors
(REM/FIT Contractors, cleanup con-
tractors, etc.) for quick and effec-
tive calculations of costs for evaluat-
ing and comparing a variety of different
cleanup or remediation alternatives.
                                  -508-

-------
                               TRIAL BURN MEASUREMENT GUIDANCE

                                        Roy Neulicht
                                       Andrew Trenholm
                                 Midwest Research Institute
                                Kansas City, Missouri  64110
                                          ABSTRACT
     The Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) requires the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to develop, promul-
gate, and implement regulations which
control the generation transportation,
treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) of
hazardous wastes.  An integral part of
these activities is reviewing and issuing
permits to hazardous waste incineration
(HWI) facilities.

     The performance of HWI facilities is
evaluated by conducting a "Trial Burn"
during which measurements are made on
the various input and output streams to
the incinerator.  In this presentation,
the measurement aspects of a trial burn
are reviewed.   The review is oriented
towards how the measurements are made.
The major elements of incineration measure-
ments related to the process monitoring,
sampling, and analysis aspects of trial
burns are discussed.  Measurements reviewed
will include volatile and semivolatile
Principal Organic Hazardous Constituents
(POHCs) and Carbon Monoxide (CO).  A
Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST) will
be demonstrated.
                                           -509-

-------
         MICROSCOPIC AND MICROCHEMICAL ANALYSES OF SOLIDIFIED
          INORGANIC WASTES CONTAINING INTERFERENCE COMPOUNDS

          H. C. Eaton, M.. E. Tlttlebaum and F. K. Cartledge
                    Hazardous Waste Research Center
                      Louisiana State University
                     Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70803


     Solidification/stabilization  processes  are thought  to be affected
by  the  presence  of certain  interference  compounds.   The  mechanism  of
interference  is  unknown  but is  believed to  involve the microscopic
phases  which  are  normally  formed during  hydration  of  the pozzolanic
matrix  materials.   Recent studies, for  example,  have characterized the
interaction between selected organic wastes and portland cement and have
shown that set retardation  results from  an  alteration of the chemical
and  morphological  structure of the calcium silicate  hydrates  that nor-
mally impart structural  integrity  to the hardened paste.

     The  present  study  is  an attempt to  determine  if inorganic wastes
(interferences) have  the same detrimental effect upon similarly solidi-
fied  inorganic sludges.   X-ray  powder diffraction  is  used to identify
the  crystalline phases  which differ in  chemical  composition  or amount
from those contained in  sludge solidified  in the absence of  interference
compounds.   Scanning  electron  microscopy  is used  to  characterize the
morphology and to identify the form of the important  phases.  The exper-
imental  results  are  described  and their importance to  the  design  of
effective  solidification schemes is discussed.
                                r510-

-------
                          VACUUM-ASSISTED IN-SITU STEAM STRIPPING
                        TO REMOVE POLLUTANTS FROM CONTAMINATED SOIL

                Arthur E. Lord, Jr., Robert M. Koerner and Vincent P. Murphy
                              Geosynthetics Research Institute
                                     Drexel University
                             Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  19104
                                            and
                                      John E. Brugger
                      Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                           U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                 Edison, New Jersey  08837
                                         ABSTRACT
     A long term project has recently been
initiated (Fall 1986) by Drexel University,
under the sponsorship of the U. S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, to develope the
means by which to steam-strip (distill)
pollutants from contaminated, soils.

     The overall project is divided into
four phases:

Phase I   - Perform literature and"infor-
            mation search and design of
            small scale laboratory experi-
            ments.

Phase II  - Run small scale laboratory
            experiments to determine the
            feasibility of steam stripping
            of a wide range of chemicals
            for pertinent soil types and
            their different conditions.

Phase III - Design and perform small pilot
            scale steam stripping and
            vacuum entrapment experiments
            on selected chemical/soil
            combinations.

Phase IV  - Perform final design of field
            unit.  Possible supervision
            of the construction of a field
            deployable unit working close-
            ly with EPA-Edtson personnel.

     Although a great deal of chemistry
and chemical engineering, literature is
available as regards steam stripping and
steam distillation, there .is virtually no
literature concerning the interaction of
steam with soils.  Thus the preliminary
work has involved simple experiments to
develope basic knowledge in this area.

     The volume expansion of a variety of
soil types exposed to steam (at about
100°C and one atmospheric pressure) in an
autoclave is discussed.  Also the behavior
of a steam front (injected at 100°C and
5 psi) in a soil-filled, thin transparent
box will be presented.  From these steam
front movements, effective permeabilities
for steam movement are derived and com-
pared with water permeabilities.

     Containment of the stripped waste is
an absolutely essential aspect of the work.
Our geosynthetic containment system is of
a unique design, and some preliminary
results with this containment system are
given.
                                            -511-

-------
              USE OF MODIFIED CLAYS FOR ADSORPTION AND CATALYTIC
                           DESTRUCTION OF CONTAMINANTS

                               S.A. Boyd and M.M. Mortland
                           Department of Crop and Soil Sciences

                                           and

                                      T.J. Pinnavaia
                                Department of Chemistry
                                Michigan State University
                               East Lansing, Michigan 48824
                                       ABSTRACT
     The unique properties of smectite clays
that are important  in designing effective
adsorbents and catalysts are (1) high surface
area (2)  high cation exchange capacity  (3)
swelling properties of the  clay platelets  and
(it) high surface acidity and reactivity. Such
properties make  these materials inherently
reactive  and allows  tremendous synthetic
versatility  to  produce  structures   having
specific  properties  for detoxication.    Our
goal is to  develop  a  process  for treating
liquid  wastes in  which the contaminant is
first immobilized  on the clay material  and
then detoxified via  catalysis  on the  clay
surface.   The  clay-based materials  being
developed for this purpose are (1) transition
metal  saturated  clays (2)  organo-clays  (3)
pillared clays and (4)  delaminated clays.  The
metal clays are versatile catalysts which  can
be used  to  form  reactive  radical cations of
organic  toxicants  such  as   dioxins   and
chlorophenols.     These  reactive  radical
species are subject to a variety of potential
reactions  to   form  less   toxic  products.
Important reactions such as polymerization
and  dechlorination have  been  achieved.
Organic  cations can also be placed on  the
surface  of   smectite  clays  to  impart
hydrophobic   properties   important    for
adsorption  of  trace  organic  contaminants
from   aqueous  streams.     Pillared   and
delaminated   clays are  microporous   to
macroporous  derivatives  formed  by   the
reaction   of  natural   clays  with   robust
polyoxocations.   The relatively large pore
sizes   of these  clays  make  them  ideal
adsorbents      for     large     chlorinated
hydrocarbons.   Also, metal catalysts can be
introduced  into their structures to facilitate
subsequent  oxidation   of   the  adsorbed
toxicant.
                                            -512-

-------
            STRINGFELLOW LEACHATE TREATMENT WITH  A ROTATING  BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR'

                   Edward J.  Opatken,  Hinton K. Howard,  and  James J. Bond
                           U. S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency
                                   Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
                                          ABSTRACT
     A study was conducted with a rotating
biological  contactor (RBC) for treatment
of leachate from the Stringfellow hazard-
ous waste site in Riverside County,  Cali-
fornia.  The leachate was transported from
California to Cincinnati, where a pilot
sized RBC was installed at the U.S.  EPA's
Testing and Evaluation (T&E) Facility.

     A series of kinetic runs were made
with primary effluent from the City  of
Cincinnati's Mill Creek Sewage Treatment
Plant to develop the biomass on disks and
to obtain a standard kinetic removal  rate.
These runs were then followed with String-
fellow leachate experiments that included
  0 Operations at various ratios of
    leachate to primary effluent
  0 Operations at 100% leachate
  0 Operations to increase the percentage
    removal of dissolved organics.

     This poster presentation reports on
the results from these experiments and the
effectiveness of an RBC to adequately treat
leachate from the Stringfellow hazardous
waste site.
                                         -513-

-------
                       SEPARATION AND RECOVERY OF HAZARDOUS WASTES

                                     Kenneth E. Noll
                                     Charles N. Haas
                                    James W. Patterson
                     Pritzker Department of Environmental Engineering
                             Illinois Institute of Technology
                                       Chicago, IL
                                        ABSTRACT
     Two projects at the Illinois Institute
of Technology that are currently supporting
the basic research activities of EPA in-
volve multi-component adsorption mechanisms
and metals speciation and precipitation
processes.  These two pieces of work are
Intended to extend the basic understanding
of separation and recovery technologies
which are vital to the current legislation
controlling hazardous waste generation,
treatment and disposal.

     The first project, dealing with organ-
ic pollutant separation and recovery, has
concentrated on the dynamics of multi-
component adsorption/desorption systems.
The kinetic data and isotherm parameters
obtained from a series of experiments
with a quartz spring apparatus have been
used to develop computer models of multi-
component adsorption in air and in water.
Preliminary tests in long column adsorption
experiments are in good agreement with both
models.

     The second project, also investigating
a separation process, has focused on metal
speciation and precipitation phenomena.
The soluble phase kinetics of metal reac-
tions in both single ligand and competitive
ligand systems have been evaluated and
reaction orders and rate constants have
been proposed for several systems.  In
addition, the effects of reaction stoichio-
metry and reactor hydraulic regime on the
onset of nucleation and precipitation have
been studied.  The resulting precipitates
have been characterized with respect to
their composition, morphology, and surface
charge.
                                          -514-

-------
                       TREATMENT OF AQUEOUS METAL  AND  CYANIDE  BEARING
                                      HAZARDOUS WASTES
                   Sardar Q. Hassan, James E.  Park,  Margaret  K.  Koczwara
                     Department of Civil  and Environmental  Engineering
                                  University of Cincinnati
                                  Cincinnati,  Ohio  45221

                                     Douglas W. Grosse
                            U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency
                      Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                                  Cincinnati,  Ohio  45268
                                          ABSTRACT
     With the amendment of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)  by the
Hazardous and Solids Waste Amendments
(HSWA) and.the resulting restrictions on
land disposal of hazardous wastes, the U$ •
Environmental Protection Agency is
assessing technologies that can be sub/-
stitutes for, or precursors to land
disposal.  This paper describes the
research work being conducted at the  EPA's
Test and Evaluation Facility in Cincinnati,
Ohio, involving treatment of electroplating
and metal finishing hazardous wastewater.

   ,  A series of treatment units has  been
designed and fabricated to determine  the
optimum combination of the units for  any
given waste.  These units are:  lime
precipitation, flocculation, clarification,
mixed-media filtration, sulfide precipita-
tion, activated carbon adsorption, ion
exchange and alkaline chlorination of
cyanide.  All of these units except
alkaline chlorination of cyanide have been
tested with industrial metal  bearing wastes
(EPA RCRA codes D006/D008) .in the first
experimental phase.  A process flow rate of
2.5 gallons per minute.was used during
these test runs and a total  of 450 gallons
of waste was treated in each  run.  Ion
exchange was found to be a promising
polishing technology.

     In the second experimental phase, the
alkaline chlorination of cyanide will be
tested after the necessary safety features
are incorporated into the system.  The
system will be modified to operate at a ,
lower flow rate of 1.0 gallons per minute
to reduce the amount of hazardous waste
that has to be imported and handled during
each run.  Plans for utilizing additional
treatment units (chromium reduction,
stabilization/fixation of precipitated
sludges) will also be presented.
                                          -515-

-------
                  AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF SINGLE DROPLET
                       COMBUSTION OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS

                         N.W. Sorbo, D.P.Y.  Chang, C.K.  Law
                  Departments of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
                               Davis, California 95616

                                    R.R.  Steeper
            Combustion Research Facility, Scandia National Laboratories,
                            Livermore, California, 94550

                                      ABSTRACT
    Experiments have been conducted with
chlorinated hydrocarbons to investigate
the combustion characteristics of liquid
hazardous wastes.  In this study, the
combustion and vaporization of single
droplets of pure chlorinated hydrocar-
bons were examined and the effect of
adding hydrocarbons to the chlorinated
hydrocarbon to facilitate burning was
investigated.  Single droplets were pro-
duced by a piezoelectric generator,
injected into a hot chamber, and sized
by microphotography.  In addition, the
liquid phase history of the droplet was
determined  using  phase   discriminated
sampling and GC analysis.  The size
history of the droplets was used to
generate D2-Law plots from which burning
rate parameters were extracted.  Evidence
of droplet extinction appeared on D2-Law
plots for certain mixtures of chlorinated
and non-chlorinated hydrocarbons.  From
this study, the effects of chlorine
loading, volatility differentials in mix-
tures, and mixture percentage in single
droplet combustion and vaporization are .
presented.  The implications of these
effects on the behavior of full scale
hazardous waste incinerators are dis-
cussed.
                                      -516-

-------
                         CATALYTIC DESTRUCTION OF HALOGENATED
                                    HAZARDOUS WASTE

                                   Howard L.  Greene
                      The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325
                                      Edward Katz
                          U.S.E.P.A., Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
                                       ABSTRACT
     Disposal of halogenated wastes using
methods of catalytic oxidation is being
evaluated from both technology and eco-
nomic standpoints.  Vapor phase oxidation
of halogenated compounds over supported
transition metal oxides shows substantial
reactivity at temperatures well below
those necessary for homogeneous reaction.
The spectrum of oxidation products
obtained depends strongly on the choice
of catalyst and the molecular makeup of
the halogenated species along with any
other molecules present in the vapor
phase.
     Catalyst deactivation and corrosion
of the support system are important
design considerations based on the quan-
tities of halogen-acids formed during
the oxidation process.  Screening of
both catalysts and supports has yielded
several systems capable of withstanding
reactor conditions.

     Although considerable research re-
mains to be done, the underlying flexi-
bility of, the catalytic process makes
it a potentially viable method for
treatment of halogenated wastes.
                                          -517-

-------
                 EXPERT SYSTEM SCREENING OF REMEDIAL ACTION
                       TECHNOLOGIES FOR CERCLA SITES

                              Lewis A. Rossman
                    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                          Cincinnati, Ohio  45268

                                  ABSTRACT
     A prototype computerized expert
system called TECHSCRN has been
developed for identifying hazardous
waste cleanup, control, and treatment
technologies that would be feasible
to apply at Superfund remedial action
sites.  The system matches character-
istics of the site and of the materials
being released against the conditions
under which a particular type of tech-
nology is applicable.  This initial
screening produces a more manageable
11st of action alternatives that can
then be subjected to more detailed
study.  The knowledge base for this
system is being  acquired primarily
from existing literature sources.
The prototype system has been
coded in the PROLOG language and
operates on a personal computer.
The system can function as both
a site-specific screening tool
and as a general purpose data
base system on remedial action
technology characteristics. In-
formation on 30 different types
of containment and removal tech-
nologies is currently available.
This knowledge base is being
expanded to include treatment
technologies as well.  Future
plans call for adding a design
capability to the system that
combines individual technologies
into overall system alternatives
as well as a cost estimating
capability to provide a better
basis for screening of alter-
natives.  A hands-on demonstra-
tion of TECHSCRN will be provided.
                                      -518-

-------
          ACTIVITIES AT LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY'S HAZARDOUS WASTE RESEARCH CENTER

                              Louis J. Thibodeaux, Director
                               Louisiana State University
                              Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70803
                                         ABSTRACT
     The Hazardous Waste Research Center
at Louisiana State University (LSU) is
conducting fundamental and exploratory
research in these general areas:
environmental media/waste interaction,
incineration, and alternative methods of
treatment/destruction. Although admin-
istered through LSU's College of Engineer-
ing, individual research projects are
being conducted by multi-disciplinary
groups representing 'a number of academic
departments. Ongoing research projects for
1987 are:
     . A Study of Immobilization
Mechanisms In Solidification/Stabilization
Using Cement/Silicate Fixing Agents:
     . Incineration of Liquid Hazardous
 Waste Droplets.
     .  An Indepth Investigation of Rotary
Kiln Incineration Performance.
     . Supercritical Extraction and
Catalytic Oxidation of Toxic Organics,
from Soil.                              >
     . Short Range Air Dispersion of
Toxics from Area Sources.
        Detoxification of Dioxin contami-
nated Sludges Using Combined Microbio-
logical and Photolytic Degradative
Approaches.
     Quickening regulatory requirements
imposed on the hazardous waste industry
have resulted in> the Center's responding
to industry needs by implementing in
1985 the Industry Associates Program.
Through this program Center resources
and research finding are being applied
to current industrial problems in
hazardous waste treatment and disposal.
One of the first projects conducted under
this program is "Fate and Transport of
Hazardous Materials After Deep Well
Disposal".  The purpose of this
research is to determine whether
interactions occur between specific
hazardous waste materials and
disposal formation rock matrices or
impurities within a rock matrix.
                                          -519-

-------
                        OXIDATION OF PERSISTENT AROMATIC  POLLUTANTS
                                BY LIGNIN-DEGRADING ENZYMES

                                     Kenneth E. HammeT
                                State University of New York
                       College of Environmental Science and Forestry
                                 Syracuse,  New York  13210

                                      B. Kalyanaraman
                               National  Biomedical  ESR  Center
                                Medical  College of  Wisconsin
                                Milwaukee,  Wisconsin  53226

                                        T.  Kent Kirk
                                 Forest  Products Laboratory
                              U. S. Department of Agriculture
                                 Madison, Wisconsin  53705

                                       John A. Glaser
                      Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                           U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                  Cincinnati, Ohio   45268


                                         ABSTRACT

     The Ifgninase of the wood-rotting fungus, Phanerochaete  chrysosporium,  catalyzes the
oxidation of a variety of lignin-related compounds.  This enzyme also  catalyzes the oxida-
tion of certain aromatic pollutants and  compounds related to  them.  Polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons with ionization potentials  less than ca. 7.55 eV,  are oxidized  to quinones,
with the source of the quinone oxygens being water.  A related  enzyme,  horseradish peroxi-
dase, is known to oxidize only those polycyclic aromatic  hydrocarbons  that have ionization
potentials less than ca. 7.35 eV, j_.e. ligninase is the more  oxidizing of the two peroxid-
ases.  Ligninase also oxidizes chlorophenols and certain  halogenated am"soles.  In the
case of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, the reaction proceeds with dechlorination at  the 4-position
to yield 2,6-dichloro-p-benzoquinone as  the product, as determined by  gas chromatography/
mass spectrometry analysis.  Certain dibenzo(p)dioxins  are also substrates for ligninase,
and the visible and electron spin resonance spectra of reactions in progress show that
substrate cation radicals are intermediates in catalysis.
                                           -522-

-------
          LABORATORY  STUDY  OF  THE  THERMAL  DECOMPOSITION OF SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE

                                     Philip H.  Taylor
                         University of Dayton  Research Institute
                                    Dayton,  Ohio  45469

                                    John F.  Chadbourne
                             General Portland, Incorporated
                                    Dallas, Texas 75221
                                        ABSTRACT
     This report presents the results of a
laboratory evaluation of the gas-phase thermal
decomposition of sulfur hexafluoride  (SFg).
Thermal decomposition profiles were gener-
ated for pure SFg and SFg doped in a mix-
ture containing carbon tetrachloride  (CC14),
tetrachloroethylene  (C£Cl4), 1,2,4-
trichlorobenzene (TCB), and toluene (CyHs).
The data were generated in both oxidative
and near-pyrolytic atmospheres with the
residence time for reaction held at 2.0
seconds.

     Thermal decomposition profiles for pure
SFg as a function of reaction atmosphere
indicate that SFg is an extremely stable
material with an extrapolated temperature
for 99.99% destruction much greater than
1050°C.  The data also indicate no substan-
tial effect of SFg stability on oxygen con-
centration.  Thermal decompositon profiles
for the SF5 mixture components evaluated
under oxidative reaction conditions indi-
cate that although SFg begins to degrade at
a temperature of 500°C, its stability
decreases slowly at higher temperatures.
The remaining mixture components exhibit
rapid oxidative degradation above tempera-
tures of 500°C.  As a result, SFg is the
most stable component in the mixture by far
with an extrapolated temperature for. 99.99%
destruction much greater than 1050°C.
Similar profiles for the SFg mixture con-
stituents evaluated under near-pyrolytic
reactor conditions indicate that SFg is the
most stable component in the mixture by far
with an extrapolated temperature for 99.99%
destruction much greater than 1050°C.

     Considerations of the molecular struc-
ture (S-F bond  dissociation energy  ~90
kcal/mole) are consistent with  the  experi-
mental results.  Measurements of SFg-OH
radical reactivity in this  laboratory
indicate very low reaction  cross-sections.
This finding is consistent  with SFg's
approximate zeroeth-order decomposition
behavior with respect to oxygen concentra-
tion.  In addition, comparison  of SFg
unimolecular decomposition  as calculated
via RRKM theory is in good  agreement with
the pure compound experimental  data.

     A major application of this study is
the use of SFg as a surrogate to monitor
hazardous .waste incinerator performance as
defined by current regulations  for  princi-
pal organic hazardous constituent (POHC)
destructability.  Two major requirements of
an ideal surrogate are high thermal stabil-
ity (relative to hazardous  constituents in
the feed), and the ability  of the surrogate
to "track" hazardous consitiuent destruc-
tion.  With respect to these requirements,
this laboratory evaluation  has  shown that
measurement of effluent SFg concentration
may represent an accurate measure of incin-
erator performance.  Field  studies  have
confirmed this hypothesis as 99.9%  ORE of
SFg has resulted in 99.999% (destruction
limit 99.9999%) ORE of CC14, C-^k' TCB> °*
any known hazardous waste constituent.

     Areas of additional study include
evaluation of the relationship between SFg
and products of incomplete combustion (PICs)
thermal stability.  This is important
because previous studies of POHC degrada-
tion indicate much higher stability for
thermal reaction products, especially under
near-pyrolytic conditions.
                                          -523-

-------
                  THE U.S. EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY

                  R.W. Ross,  R.H. Vocque, and L.R. Waterland
                              Acrurex Corporation
                             Jefferson,  Arkansas
      In the past year, three
major incineration test programs
have been completed at EPA's
Combustion Research Facility
(CRF).  The first consisted of
incinerating a synthetic waste
comprised of distilled fuel oil
containing 30 percent PCB-1260 in
the CRF liquid injection
incineration system (LIS).  The
second test program consisted of
incinerability testing of four
wastes being generated through
remediation of the Bridgeport
Rental and Oil Services (BROS)
Superfund site in Bridgeport, New
Jersey.  The third program
investigates the fate of trace
elements fed to an incinerator as
a function of feed composition
and the incinerator temperature
and excess air level.  Results
from these tests are abstracted
in this poster (the BROS test and
the HIS trace element tests are
discussed in other papers in the
symposium).
                                    -524-

-------
                 CONSTRUCTION AND SHAKE DOWN OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
                            CHAMBER FOR SOIL REAGENT RESEARCH
                                    Michael Black
                    United States Environmental Protection Agency
                   Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
                                26 W. St. Clair Street
                                Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
     Chemical and biochemical means to
detoxify soil are becoming more promi-
nent in the arsenal of treatment techno-
logies for the detoxification of soil
contaminated with hazardous waste.  Due
to permitting restrictions and the lack
of controlled field conditions, the
application of these new technologies
to actual field sites continues to be
throttled.  The Environmental Testing
Chamber (ETC) has been assembled to
alleviate some of these difficulties.
At this stage of investigation, the
chamber is currently built and awaiting
more auxiliary equipment in order to
begin shake down and testing to deter-
mine design performance.  It is designed
as a generic device, that can study
chemical, biological, physical and
engineering design aspects of hazardous
waste treatment technologies.  This
testing chamber will give a better
assessment of the treatability of a
technology at this intermediate scale.
The loss of contamination is best
partitioned into the various environ-
mental  and treatment process parts
affecting the hazardous waste site.  The
Environmental Testing Chamber will permit
the allocation of contaminant losses to
the various major contributors to the
overall loss.

     The main objectives of the ETC
research are:  1) close simulation of
field conditions; 2) improved control of
treatment technology; 3) engineer treat-
ment optimization; 4) enhance scale-up
assessment; 5) provide cost-effectiveness
treatment design; 6) access to all con-
taminated media in the chamber; 7) com-
plete controls of contaminant losses.
The planned future developments of the
chamber include additional aspects to
more completely simulate the real world
such as microclimatology and weathering.
Also, to develop additional prototype
chambers, as necessary,  to study other
treatment processes and  environmental
settings.  Other possible chamber design
changes may include:  1) rainfall simu-
lation; 2) photolytic decomposition
reactions; and 3) surface and subsurface
waterflow as it affects  the treatment
process.
                                        -525-

-------
            EARTHEN LINERS:  PROTOTYPE PHASE OF A FIELD STUDY OF TRANSIT TIME
    Karen A. Albrecht, Beverly L. Herzog, Robert A. Griffin, Wen-June Su, Ivan Krapac
                                  and Keros Gartwright
                             Illinois State Geological Survey
                                  Champaign, IL  61820

                                         ABSTRACT
     In the first phase of a project to
determine transit times of water and solute
through a partially-saturated field-scale
earthen liner, a prototype clay liner
(10x30x3 feet) was constructed.  The main
goal of the prototype was to determine if
desired moisture, density, and hydraulic .
conductivity relations could be achieved in
the field using the selected clay material
(Batestown Till) and full-size compaction
equipment.  Specifically, the prototype was
necessary to determine if the U.S. EPA
hydraulic conductivity criterion of less
than IxlO"7 cm/s for earthen liners could
be met at the study s.ite.  Additional goals
were to test instrument installation tech-
niques and provide undisturbed samples of
liner materials.

     In-situ prototype infiltration rates
were measured using two large  (5T inner
ring diaia.) double-ring infiltrometers.
Apparent steady-state flux of .1.5x10-7 cm/s
was achieved after about 3 weeks.  Similar
rates (2xlO~7 cm/s) were obtained from
three smaller infiltrometers  (8" inner ring
diam.).  Results suggest that-the prototype
met the low hydraulic conductivity require-
ment .

     Rhodaraine and fluorescein were placed
in the inner and outer rings,  respectively,
of one of the large infiltrometers -to indi-
cate possible preferential flow pathways.
Dye patterns observed during excavation
indicated that some lateral  flow occurred
between lift interfaces.  Although the
performance criterion was met, the dye
experiments show a need for better lift
bonding.

     Morphological study of two prototype
profiles revealed variation in the degree
of compaction within lifts.  Thinner lifts
or longer compactor feet are expected to
improve compaction uniformity and lift
bonding.

     A combination of vertically and
horizontally, installed tensiometers, gyp-
sum blocks, neutron access tubes, and ly-
simeters were used to monitor moisture and
dye movement.  Instruments worked in
either orientation (except lateral neutron
access tubes which were damaged during
construction).  However, the horizontal
instruments were necessarily installed at
lift interfaces which may be preferential
flow paths.  In addition, horizontal
instruments may be destroyed if the lift
thickness is decreased.  Vertical instal-
lations 'showed no evidence of channeling
and were deemed more satisfactory than
horizontal ones.

     The next phase of  the project  is to
build  a  large clay liner  (30x60x3 feet)
for long-term monitoring of ponded water
and tracers.
                                           -526-
                     •
     ft US. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1087— 7 "» 8- 1 2 II 67008

-------