4>EPA
             United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency      "
              Office of Research and
              Development
              Washington, DC 20460
EPA/600/K-92/003A
July 1992
             Technology Transfer
           on the Use of
Treatability Guidelines  in
Site Remediation
Stabilization/Solidification

-------

-------
Superfund Policy Guidance:
immobilization

m inappropriate for Volatile Organics
® Appropriate Only for Materials
  Containing Inorganics and
  sometimes Semi-Volatile Organics
  and Non-Volatile Organics
Superfund Policy Guidance:

Immobilization	

« Use of Immobilization for Semi-Volatile and
  Non-Volatile Organies Requries Either
  Site-Specific Treatabiltty Studies OR
  Non-Slte-Specific Treatabiltty Study Data for
  "Similar Waste"
* "Similar Waste" is Defined In Terms of the
  Contaminants, Concentrations, and Waste Matrix
* Total Waste Analysis (TWA)
B
Solidification/Stabilization
Applicability

      • Soils
      li Sediments
      9 Sludges
                                     8-2

-------
GUIDE FOR CONDUCTING
TREATABILITY STUDIES
UNDER CERCLA:
Solidification/Stabilization
Presentation Outline
0 Introduction
*l Technology Description
« Role of Treatability Studies

-------
 Odentify Problems of
 Waste Handling
   0 Debris
   • Mixing
   0 Emissions
   it Analyses
Assess Waste Uniformity

 • Multiple Wastes
 €* Homogeneous or
   Heterogeneous Waste
 0 Worst Case Concentrations
   vs. Average Case
   Concentrations
B
Measure Volume Increase
Associated with Processing

 0 Space Available for
   Disposal
 0 Other Limitations
                            8-4

-------
Solidification/Stabilization
Process

     * In-Situ
     * Excavation
      When to Perform
     Treatability Testing
                                     B
    As Soon As Possible
Potential Goals for
Treatability Studies
 Identify Problems in Waste Handling
 Assess Waste Uniformity
 Measure Volume Increase Associated
 with Processing
 Develop Processing Parameters and
 Achievable Treatment Levels
                                  8-3

-------
 Evaluate Physical
 Characteristics
 « Unconfined Compressive Strength
  (UCS)(ASTMD1633-34)
 • Permeability (TMSWC-13)
 • Wet/Dry (ASTM 04843-88)
 ® Freeze/Thaw (ASTM D4842-90)
  Other Parameters to
  Evaluate During Curing

  0 Off Gassing
  • Curing Temperature
  0 Moisture Content
  • Additive Ratios
         B
Percent Reduction Calculation
•H1+ Additive Ratio)x
              (Raw Concentration)
1x100
  Where Addttlve Ratio =
                                      c
                                  8-6

-------
 Develop Processing
 Parameters and the Level of
 Processing Control

 • Perform Tiered Treatability Testing
 % Evaluate Chemical Characteristics
 • Evaluate Physical Characteristics
 * Estimate Treatment Costs
 Perform Treatability Testing

 • Representative Number of
   Samples
 * Homogenization of Raw Waste
   Samples
 * Multi-Tier Treated Sample
   Evaluation
B
Evaluate Chemical
Characteristics
• Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
  Procedure (TCLP 55FR26986 June 1990)
« Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
  Procedure - Distilled H jO
0 Total Waste Analysis — Semi-Volatile
  Organics (EPA Method SW 846-8270)
« Total Waste Analysis - Volatile Organics
  (EPA Method SW 846-8240)
                                    8-5

-------
 Homogenized Raw Waste
 Sample Evaluation
 RewWute
  Simple
                                   Analytical
                                    Rwutt
                                   Should Be
                                   Equivalent
                    Grab Samplaa from Mixed
                     Sample for Analyeie
       Multi-Tiered Treated Sample Evaluation
                EvituH ntd TlUM Oust RnultB
TIER I     _——
Screen    JUU
      Reagent Mix 1
TIER II
Refine
   Euium mat Sonet SMI RMUH*
  DDD
 Reagent Mix 3
  DDD
Reagent Mix 2C
TIER Hi
Evaluate/
Select
      Reagent Mix 2A1 (Produces Samples for All Teeta)
B
 Additional Considerations

 » Chain-of-Custody of Raw, Treated, and
   Reserve Samples
 « Direct Observation of Mixing and
   Castings
 % Independent Qualified Analysis
 m Final Report
 ® Vendor Field Tests
                                           8-8

-------
 Time Line Required for
 Treatability Tests	
 Tier I - Treat and Screen
   • Cure            14-28 Days
   * Analyze Treated      21 Days
     Samples
   • interpret Results       7 Days
     and Reformulate
 Time Line Required for
 Treatabiiity. Tests    	
 Tier II -Refineand Retreat
   • Cure            14-28 Days
   • Analyze Treated      21 Days
     Samples
   * interpret Results      7 Days
     and Reformulate
                                 B
 Time Line Required for
 Treatability Tests _
Tier III - Evaluate/Select Remedy
Cure
Analyze Treated
Samples
Interpret Results
and Report
                       28 Days
                       21 Days

                       14 Days
                                 8-7

-------
11.     Schiegel, R.  1989.  Residues from High Temperature Rotary Kilns and Their
       Leachability. Presented at the Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
       Technologies: Domestic and International, W&E Environmental Systems, Germany.
       June 19-22.

12.     Sell, N.J. et al.  1992. Solidification and Stabilization of Phenol and Chlorinated Phenol
       Contaminated Soils, 2nd Volume. ASTM STP 1123. T.M. Gilliam and C.C. Wiles, Eds,
       ASTM Philadelphia, PA, p. 73-85.

13.     Sims, R.C.  1990. Soil Remediation Techniques at Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites:
       A Critical Review.  Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association Reprint
       Series, No. RS-15, Air and Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 43 p.

14.     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. The Superfund Innovative
       Technology/Evaluation Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edition.  EPA/540/5-
       91/008, OSWER and ORD, Washington, D.C.

15.     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Immobilization Technology Seminar:
       Speaker Slide Copies and  Supporting Information.  CERI-89-222.  Center for
       Environmental Research, Cincinnati,  OH.

16.     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Generic Treatability Protocol for
       Solidification/Stabilization Treatment for Contaminated Soils.

17.     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Stabilization/Solidification of CERCLA '-•
       and RCRA Wastes: Physical Tests, Chemical Testing Procedures, Technology Screening,
       and Field Activities, Report No. EPA/625/6-89/022, Center for Environmental Research
       Information, Cincinnati, Ohio, 82 p.

18.     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Technology Evaluation Report:  SITE
       Program Demonstration Test,  In Situ Stabilization/Solidification, Hialeah, Florida,  Vol.
       I. Report No. EPA/540/5-89/004a, Center for Environmental Research Information,
       Cincinnati, Ohio.

19.     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Soil Sampling Quality Assurance User's
       Guide. Second Edition, EPA/600/8-89/046. March

20.     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. Handbook for Stabilization/Solidification
       of Hazardous Wastes. EPA/540/2-86/001. Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
       Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.

21.     Weitzman, L. et al. 1989. Volatile Organic Emissions from Stabilized Hazardous Waste.
       Final Report. U.S. EPA Contract #68-02-3994.
                                         8-10

-------
            REFERENCES FOR STABILIZATION/SOLIDIFICATION GUIDE
1.     Earth, E.F. and R.M. McCandless et al. 1989.  General Guide for Treatability
      Assessment: Draft S/S Technology Information Bulletin for the USEPA Engineering
      Forum.  USEPA Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, July.

2.     Earth, E.F. and C. Wiles. 1989. Technical and Regulatory Status of
      Solidificaton/Stabilization in the United-States.  Proceedings on the Application of U.S.
      Control Technology in Korea. Seoul, Korea.

3.     Cartledge, F.K. et al. 1989. A Study of the Morphology and Microchemistry of
      Solidified/Stabilized Hazardous Waste Systems. Final Report for U.S. EPA #CR-
      812318.

4.     Conner, J.R.  1990.  Chemical Fixation and Solidification of Hazardous  Wastes.  Van
      Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 692 p.

5.     Cullinane, J.M. and L;W. Jones. 1989. Handbook for Solidification/Stabilization of
      Hazardous Wastes, Final Report, Interagency agreement AD-96-F-2-A145 between the
      EPA and the U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers, Waterways Experimental Station,
      Vicksburg, MI.

6.     Eschenbach, R.C. et al.  1989.  Process Description and Initial Test Results with the
      Plasma Centrifugal Reactor. Presented at the Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
      Treatment Technologies:  Domestic and International, June 19-22.  Retech, Inc., Ukiah,
      California.

7.    Geosafe Corporation. 1989. In Situ Vitrification for Permanent Treatment of
      Hazardous Wastes.  Presented at Advances in Separations: A Focus  on
      Electrotechnologies for Products and Wastes, April 11-12. GSC 1903, Geosafe
      Corporation, Kirkland, Washington.

8.    Geosafe Corporation. 1989. Application and Evaluation Considerations for In Situ
      Vitrification Technology: a Treatment Process for Destruction and/or Permanent
      Immobilization of Hazardous Materials. GSC 1901, Geosafe Corporation, Kirkland,
      Washington.

9.    ' Keller, DJ. 1989. Construction Quality Assurance for  Stabilization/Solidification. Draft
      Final Report, W.A. #2-17.  USEPA Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati,
      Ohio, August 31.

10.    Kingsbury, G., P. Hoffman and B. Lesnik.  The Liquid Release Test  (LRT).
      Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Waste Testing and Quality Assurance Symposium,
      American Chemical Society. July 24-28.   V , . _,


                                          8-9

-------