-------
pi is
.
8-
a O
ifmt
S » 8 g v^ O
P 3 STo^g;
P
O- CD ^ £5 K- fa
P3 Du f3 rH- o o
^ .0- S § g q
^- cr .-t-
f*T <_.< cr
B'g 3 £&8l
52. § •& Bicra cr
o- 3 «-».2 r-» a
o co sr1^ a- o
0 p, ps o co Q,
3 CD o p
tt CD *2. en "
en M> 5 O g-
S? ffi rio O Q
CD
en a- 3
S 2 Sn
O tS O. fTQ
2 S g: CD ^
g DJ 5; » c?
1.1 | I |
P'-ll
Ch CD en J—• CD
GO
-e<
^.
§
*>
w
s
ON
O
O
CO
M
£•
n
ommunity Wast
i
P
J?
™
a
N
f^
CL
1
1
on
J?
!
P
crq
ec
g
2
5,
w
£
ON
O
CO
.O
' t^
o.
^
aste Disposal ....
w
?
ON
O
o
fe
^
O
g
ility Managemen
<-*
m
S
ON
O
a?
en
o|
o.
•<6
3
83
cn
ff
O
5"
•a
o
en
£L
ts
'£
ON
O
g
3
MM*
CfQ
1
cn
ff
1
»
<%
1
y»-
:
:
W
S
ON
O
o
W
OJ
e
5'
crq
VI
s-
O
1
era
3
&=
!?
*t
M
?
ON
o
CO CO
w u>
t-^ O
f""*i CO CO CO
to to to i—1
vo oo ~J to
1
ronmenta
g
&3
y
W
era
TO
S
tfl
?
ON
O
c?a
ss-
Informat
5'
CO
o
J-
"1
i
tt
S
ON
O
o
>
s
•D
X)
/J
i
•ft
&
is
g
ON
O
w
ronmenta
3
*G
jjr
S-
^-d
|
p*.
§
TJ
a
I
s*
9
W
S
ON
O
0
•$ \
S-. i
« 1.
S
ii
P
2 ^
J
!.
3
•*
S
S
ON
O
O
^
»
_K
^
?
3
••ri
•^
Tl
*D
>
ON
0
o
VQ VO VD
I—' I—' I—>
'cB ^ ^
Ui UJ W
vo oo ^-J
vo vo
i—* t—'
c5 c5
ON
U)
Cd
o
i—:
*"+• ^3 xv
& ^ ^
2 2 f»
^a^
CD O ="
lpl
§ W °
irs &
of a ser
y, the
a- 2
S rt.
2 5 3' CP
o g S 3
era 3 22. O
^ ^^'g
en O fa S.
!-*• t-t c*- M.
OQ 3 CD o
s 3 & 0
SS^>
§ S^H^
s s
^ &
o o'
CB
P
w
>
52
o
sr
s
I>M«
o
3
S5
p.
OTQ
-------
•§!§
a oo .s
£ .S ft
T3 C O
o3 c3 *'"-{
«J .2 ft
g S ^
.S § E
'al g ,c3
> 00 _
0 (U 0
-._> oo" T3
^ « «
1 1 1 QJ rr3
to O 52
1*1
isj (U °
N oo ft
&A O C^
4^ ft tJ
Understanding Risk
Assessment
Td
oo
^2
'ft
-e
o
ft
ft
a
00
2
OO
U
•!-!
and their uncertaint
decision making.
1 %
i a
Risk assessment has become an im]
analytical tool in environmental decisio
Relationship Between Risk
Assessment and Risk
i g .2
^ 2 c
G <« (U
S -a e
1^1
•-^ o oo
•^ ft 00
J5* (U «J
S ^ ^
S\ ^
•«-» *•• 3
C oo S
Risk assessme
veloping regulation
exposure to toxic pc
° SL !i
o o g
•-P o g
ing. It may be defined as the identifica
potential adverse effects to humans or e
terns resulting from exposure to environ
Management
Risk management is the decision-making
process in which an action or a policy is devel-
oped once a risk has been determined to exist.
It integrates risk assessment with technical,
political, social, and economic issues to de-
OO I <^) r- K/j
| &J || ~
V3 <]J ^2 ^ CH C3
O § "3 -t-> p &Q
*>8|.l!
oo -a
Comparativ
Assessment
•^ O li ' *^— I Ci
* T^ C * • • F— < *^ * -T
hazards. The risk involved (probable
disease, functional deficits, or death) r
expressed in quantitative terms or in qua]
terms. The process for human health r
sessment often involves the following s
1^ haynrH ir1pnfift/>atir>n rle>t<=>T«-ii»-iai
\ 3
whether a pollutant adversely affects 1
health
ment for human health considerations.
Risk management must take into account
. the uncertainties associated with various as-
sumptions and judgments made in each step of
the risk assessment process. When possible, the
risk assessment should discuss the uncertain-
: ties so that a risk manager can factor this into
decision making.
' c^ J-c o (D c•
" o S2 *-> H -5
• 2 § ™ •
5 >, «
,i4 60 X) U ft *-< S
^ ?s o c Md o a
•c & & i -a ^ §
o 1 s | a g i
tli^it
I&lsil?f
,, >, s s s -a i ^
.^^^siala
B • 3 . & « & ^
i&riiii
eg o o o
.§_,!> .-j
a . & -2
2) dose-response assessment — dete]
tion of the relationship between the le
exposure and the probability of occurre
adverse effects
3) exposure assessment — determinat
the extent of exposure
Human Health Assessment
^
o
• I— (
00
-4— >
• r- 1
W3
cd
1
a
3
1
r—H
13
o
00
oo
• !— 1
I— H
1— 1
jB ^
's -i
4) risk characterization — description
nature and often the magnitude of risk, v
00
O
1
O
8
g
'oo
1— 1
3
O
O
O
I
00
ing the accompanying uncertainty
from toxic pollutants are a function of two
measurable factors: hazard and exposure. To
cause a risk, a chemical has to present hazard
and be present in the human environment at
some significant level. The risk assessment is
an interpretation of the evidence on these two
^
'C ~3 oo
CU .*-!
.2 o li
1 § S
«£ g
S | §
§ "S 1
oo _ o3
s ^ -£
« oo .S
"^^ ^\
2) ranking the prob
(human health, ecok
of life); this ranking
1 &*
1 > 1
The fact that exposure to many poi
hazards can occur simultaneously and in
ing degrees dictates that the risk asses
•*— *
cd
•s
.s
1
1
o
it
li
rS o
5 'oo
P* 0>
CO V-i
03 rt
i— < rj
process is complex. Risk assessment emp
systematic evaluation process to determi:
y&l Printed on Recycled Paper -i
-------
CL
III
ecl-e.5
es
.
I II
<" g.
p
CA
CD
P
i-J
O
er
p- s
E3
O
S 8
s
CO ^
O P.
J2 O
Fi oo
Sl.
« • « a »
ta 3 g » §
5s So & O B'
1113:1
5
c«
C/l
C/l
|
a
SO
1 §
£L en
"
8 cf £
III
B 8 g-
O* O S
& 3
S- R'
Crt
3 <2 o
era era <5
Pi. Pt O
O O >T3
^3 *-3 3
O js g
^ ^ O
2 S3 B,
s §
en
W
S
-------
11
tl
-------
Td
CD"
CL
1—t.
ft
S
*T3
O
VI
cro
p
i 3
ent of expos
CD £2
o
§
£L S
CD
CTQ
CD
P
c«
s
on
3
S
5?
C«
I—1-
p
TO
VI
I
g
C-f
T3
3
H-1-
D-
CD
c«
era
C2
h^*
a.
1
CD
R5
onitor
CD
D-
2
SL
•S
-------
-------
00
a\
Cu
g
CL
5'
S
sf
>
en
en
CD
en
en
i'
ale Reproductive Risk.
»3
I
era
I
«*
O
P
S
CO
o
vo
oo
o
I
&
5
re
!•
5
'en
CO
3
K
oo
Ul
o
N> W
1?
1?
Ji. O
oo us
4^. o
C^ CD
CL
O
C
CL
i
CD
Cn
i-h
or Assessing Female Reprod
o
5-
CD
5
£
3
ashington,
a
p
«_,
1
Oi
O
«J
H-*
vo
oo
oo
»=g
«
a,
re
S
i
«B.
en
5?
*•*
^^^
C/l
CO
s
""rt Crt
£ O
S s.
,\ &
CO CD
rv H-*
o B'
(0 CD
C/x en
O*
*-i
IT*
KM
C
3
§
L Health Assessment of Cherr
0
e.
!
CD
en
Washingto
_P
O
p
C/3
CD
. >d
CD"
t-J
P .
O"^
O)
'"t
to
jfx
h-i
VO
OO
ON
*n
re
CL
re
3.
hw4
?o
re
CTQ
1
s~*.
1— '
tfl
b
g
Cu
CD
5"
CD
en
o5
i-l
C
<-*
OQ
rr\
jnicity Risk Assessment. Wai
IF
TO
1
b
p
September
to
^
H- '
VO
oo
ON
M
re
Q.
re
-»
P
^^
5d
w
So*
*1
1
LO
J^
o
ON
is
6
H -*1
•i3
|P
3 ' ^w
CD W H
O '"C'
B C/i O
CL ^ CD
ju • CL
3 ^5 O
CD S3 C
^ O •
CL C S1
. ^di r~i
S CL CD
|~t ftt Ff:
CL & „,
<• 3 O
2 CD M
'II
111
Cu g j^
B'l g^
Bl>l
i % &*
'— CD !>
i-h en fe
O fn CD
a a PS
3 8 en
° 2 P
>-*• 3 R
a r* o
M ^3
SB,B
to g. s?
-^- CD '
?-
•i &
O !-"
s »
aero
S
O r3
IP
si n
B" J—
en CD
o" ^
M &
i-r4 *~^
Oto
*»
w
h^ yQ
o> oo
.1. f^f)
^D *
CP. M
II
S! £L
^ |"^
CfQ
s*
p^.
ft)
*^
^— ^
Ol
H-1
w
1
^
*«— ^
IV
•
ON tn
vo r^
^° n
Sa
00 CL
tO CD
2) tf-
CD
en
Q>
<~l
O
<
CD^
cT
pmental Toxicity Risk Asses
en
1
1
i=r.
B'
%
§
b
p
b
CD
O
1
cT
J"^
i—i
vo
VO
|_L
..
fD
CL
S
i
"•E.
So*
5
CA
OO
T1
?e
tT >^
CD r^
O Q
ll
B e4-
^Tj H^
en CD
>-b ^^
S O
Q n
1 1
;inogen Risk Assessment
inogen Risk Assessment ;
. Washingtc
are currentl
*<. 5
§! b
cw 0
t«
CL t^j
f» ?!•
C? CD
1!
?£
Eii
i VO
^^ -.5°.
tJ C/3
c
| H tfl
en " >•
P5 SS*
en r/i IH^
C e« ^
J"^ en e«
EJ. 3 re
"< 3- a
lent Guidelines. Washin
guidelines are the first ste
constantly undergo Agen
0 ^ OTQ
^< !-.. Sf
en » §
8 3— 3
Is P
•5 § P
f-T-
0. |
P 3
§ era
" 13
3 8
2. o
en CD
CD en
p. en
8 &
s §•
§ §
-------
wnt Contact L
«
=2
1
X
pT<
Contact
1
.—
m
o
oo
m
o
vo
CM
CM
0
CM
O
03
• l-H
O
O
1
I Cancer Risk Assessment
vj
f^v,
ON
vo
CO
T— 1
Rick Hertzberg
1 Chemical Mixtures
m
o
oo
m
o
vo
01
01
o
CM
Carol Kimmel
>>
| Developmental Toxicolog
CM
01
> — i
o
VO
Ol
CM
0
CM
O
3
CO
-t->
|| Ecologic Risk Assessmen
m
i — i
^o
ON
1— 1
ON
Norman Childs
1 Envkonmental Media
CM
m
*o
i — i
ON
Linda Bknbaum
>^
1 Environmental Toxicolog
CM
CM
O
01
01
o
01
Michael Callahan
| Exposure Assessment
m
vo
LO
v]
v]
Robert Ambrose
W>
.a
3
1 Exposure Assessment Mo
01
rn
1
1 — 1
-3-
*o
ON
r— <
ON
Michael Waters
| Genetic Toxicology
41-4173
IO
ON
ON
13
o
CO
o
6
|| Hazardous Ak Pollutants
01
m
W")
ON
T 1
ON
1
I— (
3
| Human Studies
m
o
00
rn
O
VO
01
01
o
01
o
Lawrence Valcovi
G
s
I Mutagenicity Risk Assess
41-4324
K~)
ON
i — i
ON
O
00
oa
ffi
1 Neurotoxicology
r-
v^
f^^.
ON
*O
m
Michael Dourson
4-1
G
| Noncancer Risk Assessme
m
o
oo
rn
CD
VO
01
01
o
01
Bob Sonawane
1 Pesticide Toxicology
m
O
00
rn
O
01
01
0
0)
G
cd
1)
CO
-------
00
-------
ents
s
?j
o
Q
8P
c
i
o
2 £ a .—;
13 .2 "^-H O _
^ ^
O Jo ^^
^^ QJ tj *T\
rn. |~ ^" JJ^
S O O "O
s.S^ o
it
a
t
b
o .a
o o
j~] ^
C^ (L)
"S ^
S 2
• <>-> 2
-2 -^
O 1>
HJ l>3
JD •-
cd o
o is
01 C
^1
sS
§5
pq
ocuments i
"0
£
W
§
C3
.§
1
M
.a
o
0-,
13
o
g
C^
O
1
F
O\
P.
66
O
CINC
5 13-5
5 13-5
E
g
>—I
O
CL,
X
a
&
•o
5
(3
|
3
e f
0
g
bu
TVNOII
<
z.
CO
D
i
HH
^
«
-------
«•
Ifl
I >
" H
I
| | «>
sr
00
-------