United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Reclamat on and
Redevelopment of
Contaminated Land
Volume II.
European
 Office of Research and
 Development
 Washington, DC 20460
EPA/600/R-92/031
March 1992
Case Studies

-------

-------
                                                    EPA/600/R-92/031
                                                    March  1992
RECLAMATION AND REDEVELOPMENT OF CONTAMINATED LAND:
          VOLUME II.  EUROPEAN CASE STUDIES
     Carrie  L.  Kingsbuiry
             Research T:
   Research  Triangle
                   and Tayler H. Bingham
                riangle Institute
                     North Carolina  27709
Park
                         by
        EPA Contract Number  68-03-3253, 2-9
                  Project Officer
                   Naomi Barkley
    Superfund Technology Demonstration  Division
       Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
               •Cincinnati,  OH 45268
       RISK REDUCTION EMGINEERING LABORATORY
        OFFICE OF RESEARCH  AND DEVELOPMENT
        r r.  ™^™,^,™,~
U.S. ENVIRONMENT
              CINCINNATE,  OHIO  45268
                           PROTECTION AGENcy
                                               Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
                                   NOTICE
    This material has been funded wholly or in part by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency under contract no. 68-03-3253 to the Research Triangle
Institute.  It has been subject to the Agency's review and it has been
approved for publication as an EPA document.  Mention of trade names or
commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                                   FOREWORD
     Today's rapidly developing and clanging technologies and industrial
 products and practices frequently carry with them the increased generation of
 materials that, if improperly dealt vkth, can threaten both public health and
 the environment.  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is charged by
 Congress with protecting the Nation's land, air, and water resources.  Under a
 mandate of national environmental laws,  the agency strives to formulate and
 implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and
 the ability of natural systems to support and nurture life.  These laws direct
 the EPA to perform research to define pur environmental problems,  measure the
 impacts, and search for solutions.

     The Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory is responsible for planning,
 implementing,  and managing the research,  development,  and demonstration
 programs to provide an authoritative,  defensible engineering basis in support
,of the policies, programs, and regulations of the EPA with respect to drinking
 water,  wasteWater,  pesticides,  toxic substances, solid and hazardous wastes,
 and Superfund-related activities.  This  publication is one of the products of
 that research and provides a vital co[mmunication link between the researcher
 and the user community.
     This report presents information
 contaminated land in England,  Wales,
on reclamation and redevelopment of
Sweden,  The Netherlands,  and the Federal
 Republic of Germany.   Case studies describe land use history,  nature of the
 contamination,  redevelopment objectives,  site remediation,  and criteria for
 cleanup.•
                         E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
                    Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
                                     iii

-------
                                  ABSTRACT

    The Research Triangle Institute (RTI) began work in 1983 to investigate
contaminated sites in the United States where cleanup measures have been
carried out to enable specific redevelopment of a site.  This work resulted in
a report issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in August
1986, documenting 16 uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.   Case studies
presented land use history and redevelopment objectives, the nature of the
contamination, descriptions of the remedial actions undertaken, the planned
upgraded reuse of the property, and the criteria for cleanup.
    During the course of the study of U.S. sites, it became apparent that con-
taminated land reclamation and redevelopment were of international interest.
Thus, the RTI study was extended to include experiences in certain European
countries.  The report presents highlights of the programs for dealing with
contaminated land in England, Wales, The Netherlands, Sweden, and the Federal
Republic of Germany.

    This report is a companion document to the August 1986 EPA report
(EPA/600/2-86/066 addressing reclamation and redevelopment in the United
States.
                                      IV

-------
                                  CONTENTS
FOREWORD.

ABSTRACT.

FIGURES..
TABLES.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
    1   INTRODUCTION	
           Background and Purpose
           Organization	
           Reference	
    2   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS...
           Summary	
                                                                          .v
                                                                         .XI
                                                                        .xii
                                                                          .1
                                                                          .2
                                                                          .2
                                                                          .3
                                                                          .3
               England, United Kingdom	3
               Wales, United Kingdom
               Sweden	
               The Netherlands	
           Conclusions.
                                       	9
                                       	10
                                       	13
               Federal Republic of Germany	16
                                                                         .17
               Role of Central Government.	17
               Very Large Sites	......	18
               Response When Contamination Impacts Current Land Use......18
               Redevelopment of Gas Works Sites	 . 19
               The Problem of Extremely Hazardous Waste	20
               On-Site Disposal Versus Removal	20
                                       	21
                                       	22
                                       		22
               Criteria for Cleanup.
    3    ENGLAND	
           Introduction and Overview
               Legislative Acts of Parliament Dealing with
                 Contaminated Land..
                                       	25
               Authorities Dealing Wijth Contaminated Land	27
               Contaminated,  Polluted,  and Derelict Lands	30
           Programs to 'Address Contaminated Land Redevelopment	32
               Functions of the ICRCL	33
               ICRCL Guidelines for Assessment of Contaminated Land	33
               Assessing Hazards of Fare and Explosion	42
               Other DOE Research. . .	45
               The Greater London Council (GLC)	51
               Examples  of Sites Undergoing Reclamation and
                 Redevelopment	. . 56
                                     v

-------
                          CONTENTS (continued)
       Case Study: Corby Steelworks, Corby, Northamptonshire	65
           Land Use History and Redevelopment Objectives	67
           Nature and Extent of the Contamination	71
           Remediation Activities	79
           Site Reuse	82
           Criteria for Cleanup	85
           Funding Assistance for Reclamation and
              Redevelopment	86
       Wandsworth Gas Works,  London Borough of Wandsworth	.	89
           Land Use History and Redevelopment Objectives	89
           Nature and Extent of the Contamination	-	90
           Remediation Activities	95
           Site Reuse	97
           Criteria For Cleanup	98
       Thamesmead, London	98
           Land Use History and Redevelopment Activities	100
           Nature and Extent of Contamination	101
           Remediation Activities	102
           Land Reuse. . •.	103
           Criteria for Cleanup	104
           Thamesmead Area 4A	,	104
           Area 5B	107
           Thamesmead Area 8K:  Broadwater South	110
           Thamesmead Site 4J/4K	Ill
       References	•	115
4   WALES, UNITED KINGDOM	121
       Introduction and Overview	121
           Industrialization in Wales	123
           Government Response to Dereliction	.	123
       Selected Contaminated Sites and Redevelopment Issues....	134
           Lieners Gelatin, Ltd,  Pontypridd, Mid Glamorgan	134
           Penrhose Tip, Rhymney Valley, Caerphilly, Mid
             Glamorgan	136
           Castle Works Burning Tip, Delyn, Clwyd	137
           Llwyneinion Brick Pits,  Wrexham Maelor,  Clwyd	137
           I.T.T./Hants Capacitors/Erie El, Wrexham Maelor,
             Clwyd	138
           Cement Asbestos Waste Site,  Cardiff, South
             Glamorgan	:	138
       Case Study:  The Lower Swansea Valley, West Glamorgan.	139
           Site Location and Special Characteristics...	139
           Land Use History	141
           Redevelopment Objectives.	146
           Nature of the Contamination	153
           Revegetation	,.	162
           Local Authority Land Acquisition	164
           Site Remediation and Redevelopment	165
           Flood Control	184
           Criteria for Cleanup	185
       References	188
                                 vi

-------
                          CONTENTS  (continued)
5   SWEDEN.	191
       Introduction and Overview	191
           Environmental Legisla;ive and Implementation	192
           Contaminated Land	195
           Inventory of Hazardou 3 Waste Sites	197
       Case Study: Augustendal • Dumpsite, Nacka	198
           Land Use History and Redevelopment Objectives	198
           Nature and Extent of Contamination. ....		200
           Remediation Activities	202
           Site Reuse	,	„•	202
           Criteria for Cleanup.	203
       Case Study: BT-Kemi Plan, Malmo		. ..		203
           Land Use. History and Redevelopment Objectives	204
           Nature and Extent of the Contamination.	 .204
           Remediation Activities		206
           Site Reuse	•	207
           Criteria for Cleanup	208
           Follow Up: The Site Conditions in 1988	208
       References	.!.....	 . ;'	210
6   THE NETHERLANDS.	I	:.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. 211
       Introduction	]	"	211
           Extent of  the Contaminated Land Problem		213
           The Legal  Framework for Dealing with Contaminated Land...214
           Assessment Guidelines]		216
           Approach to Site Cleanup	221
       Case Study:  Lekkerkerk. . . J	222
           Site History	J	.223
           Nature and Extent of  the Contamination	223
           Remediation Activities	224
           Site Reuse	J	229
           Criteria for Cleanup. J	229
       Case Study:  Tilburg Gas Wdrks	•.	229
           Site History	J	230
           Nature and Extent of  the Contamination	230
           Remediation Activities	231
           Site Reuse	I	235
           Criteria for Cleanup	235
       Case Study:  Delfshaven, Rdttendam Harbor,  Rotterdam	....235
           Land Use History and  Redevelopment Objectives	236
           Nature and Extent of .tine Contamination	236
           Remediation  Activities	237
           Site Reuse	240
           Criteria for Cleanup	 . .	240
       Case Study:  Merwedepolder, Dordrecht	241
           Site History and Redevelopment Objectives	241
           Nature and Extent of  the Contamination	241
           Remediation  Activities	.'. .	242
           Site Reuse	'. . . .'	245
           Criteria for Cleanup	245
       References	246

-------
                      CONTENTS (continued)
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY	248
Introduction	248
   The Federal Program	248
   The City-State of Hamburg	252
       Department of Environmental Protection for Hamburg	254
       Landscape Planning and Town Planning for Hamburg	257
       Contaminated Sites in Hamburg	,.260
   The Ruhr District	264
       The WBK	•	264
       Contaminated sites in the Ruhr District	264
       The Central and Southern Regions	.	267
       Waste Control in State of Hessen	267
       Site of Chemical Plant Firma Merck	 .268
       Schwabisch-Gmund Gas Works	.	.	268
   Case Study:  Havighorster Moor Dump Site,  Hamburg.	269
       Land Use History	•	269
       Nature and Extent of Contamination	269
       Remediation Activities	. . .	269
       Guidelines for Cleanup	270
       Later Remediation Activities	270
       Site Reuse	271
   Case Study:  Brake Dumpsite, Bielefeld	271
       Land Use History	272
       Nature and Extent of Contamination	272
       Remediation Activities	273
       Site Reuse	273
   Case Study:  Industrial Waste Site, Dortmund. . I	274
       Site History and Redevelopment Objectives	274
       Nature and Extent of Contamination	274
       Remediation Activities	275
       Site Reuse	,	277
       Criteria for Cleanup	277
   .Case Study:  Railway Car Repair Station, Central	277
       Land Use History	277
       Nature and Extent of the Contamination.	277
       Remediation Activities	• .278
       Site Reuse	279
   Case Study:  Gendorf, Altotting Rural District,  Bavaria	279
       Land Use History	279
       Nature  and  Extent of Contamination.
.280
       Remediation Activities	280
        Site  Reuse.
                                                                .283
       Guidelines  for  Cleanup	283
   References.
                                                                .284
                             Vlll

-------
                                 FIGURES
 1   Map  of  Europe  showing countries  included in  this  study.	4
    Map of  the U.K.
                                                                      .23
 3    Interpretation of  "Trigger Con:entrations"	39

 4    Location of the Willow Brook Central and West Area	 . .72
 5   Principal areas of the contamination assessment at Willow
       Brook Central and West....
 6   Trial pit data from a sampling
                                                                      .73
location within the slurry
       deposit area, Willow Brook Central and West	'.	78

    Land reuse following reclamation at Corby	84
8   Layout of the Wandsworth Gas Works Site before demolition
       of the plant structures...- I
9   Redevelopment objectives for the Wandsworth Gas
       Works site	
12  Diagram showing disposal facility design at Thamesmead
       Area 4J/4K	
13  Map of Wales.
14  Map showing counties of Wales,
                                                                      .91
                                     	92

10  Plan of the Thamesmead Site, London	99

11  Diagram showing Thamesmead, Area 5B	108
                                  .114

                                  ,122
the number of contaminated
       sites,- and the percentage of total area in each county
       that is contaminated	J. .	129
15  Location of the Lower Swansea Valley Project
                                  .140
16  Metals production industries in the Lower Swansea Valley from
       1717 to 1980	j	 .	144
                                                                     .145
17  Chronology of metals production1 in the Lower Swansea
       Valley from 1717 to 1980	
18  Development of the Swansea docks	147
                                   IX

-------
                           FIGURES  (continued)
19  The Five Park planning scheme.
                                                                      .152
20  Waste materials and erosion in the Lower Swansea Valley
       before reclamation ................................... • ......... 156

21  Land acquisition by the local authority 1965-1982 ................ 166

22  Reclamation sites in the Lower Swansea Valley ..................... 171

23  Planned housing and the planned school sited on the
       Augustendal dumpsite ....... , .............................. •
24  Map of The Netherlands ............................................ 212

25  Tilburg Gas Works Site showing extent of excavations .............. 232

26  The Delfshaven district showing demolition zone, contamination
       areas and location of planned residential buildings. . . ......... 238

27  Schematic of Merwedepolder showing Areas 1 through 4,  designated
       for purposes of the remedial action ............................ 243
28  Map of the Federal Republic of Germany..-.
                                                                      .249
29  Diagram to define abandoned waste disposal sites.
                                                                      .251
30  Lined disposal pit at the Dortmund industrial site.
.276
31  The encapsulation scheme at the Gendorf site.
                                                                      .282

-------
                                  TABLES
 1   Tentative  "Trigger Concentrations"  Recommended by The  ICRL for
        Selected Inorganic Contaminants	35
                                  1
2   Tentative "Trigger Concentrations" Recommended by The ICRL for
        Contaminants Associated With Former Coal Carbonization Sites .37
 3   Tentative Guidelines  Proposed by AERE Harwell  for Soil
        Contaminants	
 4   Guidelines Developed by the Greater London Council  (GLC)  for
        Assessment of Contaminated
                                                                      .49
                                   Land.
                                                                      .54
 5   Range of Chemical Tests Performed on Samples From the Various
        Areas of The.Willow Brook Central and West Site. .	75

 6   Summary of Contamination Levels Indicating Serious  Pollution
        In Vacant Section of Wandsworth Gas Works Site.	94

 7   License Limits for Disposal Facility at Thamesmead  Site 5B	112
8   Hazardous Materials That May Ce

9   Types of Potentially Contaminat
12  Water Quality Criteria.
13  Levels of Contaminants in Soil
        Dumpsite.
14  Levels of Contaminants in Seepage Water from the Augustendal
        Dumpsite.
                                   .use Site Contamination. . . .	127

                                   ed Sites by County	130
10  Land Acquisition by the Local Authority 1965-1982	167

11  Reclamation and Clearance Schenes in the Lower Swansea Valley. . .170

                                    	187
                                   Samples  from the  Augustendal
                                                                    .201
                                                                    .201
15  Guidelines for Site Assessment Developed by the Ministry of
        Housing,  Physical  Planning and the  Environment  Under the
        Soil  Cleanup  (Interim)  Act of  1983	217

16  Pollutants Determined in Soil Samples from the Lekkerkerk Site.  .225
17  Pollutants Determined in Water

18  Background Levels  of Elements i
                                   Samples from the Lekkerkerk Site .226

                                   i Soils	256

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


    The authors wish to acknbwledge EPA staff members—Project Officer,
Ms. Naomi Barkley, Mr. Don Sanning, Program Manager for Remedial Action
Investigation; and Ms. Norma Lewis, Project Officer during the conception
stages of the European study—for their guidance and helpful comments
throughout the study.  We also acknowledge Ms. Mary Aitken for her help in
writing several of the case studies.  We are very grateful for the cooperation
of the government offices and  the many individuals who supplied us information
and patiently answered our questions.
                                     XI1

-------
                                   SECTION 1

                                 INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND*AND PURPOSE
     There are numerous instances in
 uncontrolled dumping or industrial s
 hazardous materials.  Since many of
 locations,  issues surrounding the reclamation and redevelopment of
 contaminated sites have become important international topics.
     The Research Triangle Institute
the United States and in Europe where
pills have contaminated properties with
these properties are in prime urban
(RTI) began work in 1983 to investigate
 contaminated sites in the United States  where cleanup measures have been
 carried out  to enable specific redevelopment  of a site.   This work resulted in
 a  report issued by'the U.S.  Environrrental  Protection Agency (EPA)  in August
 1986,  documenting  16  uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.    Case studies
presented  land  use  history  and redev
contamination,  descriptions of the  r
elopmenti objectives,  the nature of the
jmedial actions undertaken,  the planned
upgraded reuse of  the property, and the criteria  for  cleanup.
    During the course of  the  study of U.S.  sites,  it  became apparent  that  con-
taminated land reclamation and redevelopment were of  international  interest.
    A Pilot Study  on Contaminated Land was  initiated  in  1981 by the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization  Committ5e on Challenges  of  Modern Society  (NATO-
CCMS) (at the suggestion  of the United Kingdom) to address the problems of
long-term remedial action for contaminated  sites.  Seven countries—Canada,
Denmark, The Federal Republic of Germany, France,  The Netherlands,  the United
Kingdom, and the U.S.--participated in the  study.  The participants in the
Pilot Study carried out individual projects concerned with a specific aspect
of remedial actions for contaminated
with contamination when it is found.
report issued by the CCMS Study Grouj
 land with  emphasis  on methods  of dealing
  The study concluded in  April  1984  with" a
•  (NATO-CCMS,  1985).  Through contacts
initiated through the Pilot Study Group, EPA learned of land reclamation

-------
programs ongoing in several countries of Europe, and guidelines being
developed'to aid in site assessments and reclamation planning.  RTI was
requested to extend the scope of the investigation of contaminated sites to
include experiences in certain European countries.
    The purpose of this report is to document experience in reclamation and
redevelopment at selected contaminated sites in England, Wales, Sweden, The
Netherlands, and the Federal Republic of Germany.  This report is a companion
document to EPA/600/2-86/066 Reclamation and Redevelopment of Contaminated
Land:  Volume I, U.S. States Case Studies.  It  is not our intent to critique
or to judge any country's program or to compare European approaches to
approaches applied in the U.S.  Our objective is merely to extend the
information base pertaining to contaminated land reclamation actions
undertaken for specific land reuse.

ORGANIZATION

    A summary of the project findings and conclusions are provided in Section
2.  Sections 3 through 7 address the site assessment and reclamation programs
in England, Wales, Sweden, The Netherlands, and the Federal Republic of
Germany, respectively.  Each Section describes  the nature and  extent of the
contaminated land problem in the subject country, the government organization
for managing reclamation programs, available funding sources,  and guidelines
established to assist reclamation.  The reclamation and redevelopment
experience at selected sites in each country is described in detailed case
studies to illustrate some of the problems encountered  in reclaiming
contaminated land for redevelopment.  Each case study describes the land use
history and redevelopment objectives, the nature and extent of the
contamination, remediation activities, site reuse, and  criteria for cleanup.
REFERENCE
NATO-CCMS,  1985.   Contaminated Land:   Report  of  the  NATO  Committee  on
Challenges  to Modern Society.   M.  A.  Smith, Editor Plenum Press,  1985.

-------
 SUMMARY
     The report presents highlights cf the programs for dealing with
 contaminated land in England, Wales,
                                   SECTION 2
                            SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The Netherlands, Sweden, and the Federal
 Republic of Germany.  Much of the information is drawn from interviews with
 various government officials and local authorities from each country who are
 responsible for overseeing and implementing the contaminated land activities
 related to reclamation and redevelopment.   Interviews and site visits were
 conducted during February and March of 1985.  Additional information was
.received through correspondence with
 earlier.   The report is current through April 1985 with certain-portions
 updated through early 1988.   The map
 addressed in this report.
various individuals contacted in Europe
in Figure 1 indicates the countries'
 England,  United Kingdom (U.K)
     England  is  one  of  the most  industrialized nations of  the world  and has  a
population density  about 15  times higher than that of the U.S.  As  a result of
this industrialization and urbanization, the potential problems associated
with the redevelopment of contaminated  land were recognized earlier in England
than in the  U.S.  Although historica:. records of land use in England have been
kept for about  200  years, there has been no systematic inventory to determine
the  extent of land  that is potentially  contaminated.  It  has been estimated
that  as much as 20,000 hectares (50,000 acres) of land in England is
potentially  contaminated.  Of the totjal land area of Greater London, about  2
percent is so damaged by contaminaticn  that it is incapable of beneficial use
without prior treatment.

-------
 3
4J
 m

 CO
•H
 fi
•H

•O
 0)
•c

rH
 u
 a
 M
 0)
•H
 h
4J


 O
 U

 Dl
 C
•H


I
 M

 (1)

 e-
 en
•H
b

-------
     Several legislative Acts of Parliament provide the framework for dealing
 with contaminated land in England and Wales.  The Derelict Land Act.of 1982
 encourages the redevelopment of contaminated and derelict land, particularly
 where private sector development will result.  The disposal of all controlled
 material,  including surplus excavatei material from redevelopment sites is
 regulated under the Control of Pollubion Act of 1974.   Site licensing is the
 primary means of regulating the disposal of all controlled wastes.  The Town
 and Country Planning Act of 1971 empowers Local Authorities to control most
 forms of development including development of contaminated land.
     Within Central Government,  the Department of the Environment  (DOE)  sets
 environmental policy for England and Wales and is responsible for implementing
 the programs related to the various environmental legislative Acts.   The
 Central  Directorate on Environmental
Pollution (CDEP) within the DOE is mainly
 responsible  for dealing with issues  involving contaminated land and advising
 local  authorities.   The DOE also supports  the Building  Research Establishment.
 Regional Water  Authorities,  rather than  the  DOE  are  responsible for the
 protection of water  resources  in England and Wales.
    The Interdepartmental  Committee  on the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land
 (ICRCL) was  established in 1976. to coordinate government activities and  advice
 relating to  contaminated land.   The  ICRCL  includes representatives  of  several
British government departments.  DOE
functions represented in the ICRCL
membership include the CDEP  (who serves as'Secretariate), the Property
Services Agency, the Building Research Establishment, Housing Directorates,
and Planning directorates responsible for administration of Derelict Land
Grants.  A basic objective of the ICRCL is "to restore contaminated land to
beneficial use economically."  The ICRCL has developed a series of formal
Notes to address redevelopment at ^lardfill sites, sewage works and farms, gas
works sites, and scrap yards and similar sites.
    One of the tasks carried out by the CDEP for the ICRCL is an effort to
develop guidelines pertinent to contalminant levels at sites where
redevelopment is being considered.  In 1983,  the ICRCL issued guidance for
Local Authorities and prospective developers on assessing and redeveloping
land that has been contaminated by its former use.  This guidance included
"Tentative Trigger Levels" to serve as criteria for comparison with specific
contaminant levels in soils.   The applicable concentrations vary with the

-------
proposed use of a site.  The Tentative Trigger Concentration are reviewed and
updated periodically by the ICRCL.  The guidance issued with the trigger
concentrations stresses  the importance of an adequate investigation of the
site prior to applying the assessment criteria.
    Methane or other combustible or explosive materials are present on many
sites being considered for redevelopment.  The assessment of fire and
explosion hazards of contaminated land is an important program aspect of the
CDEP and the ICRCL.  The ICRCL has developed "Notes on the Fire Hazards of
Contaminated Land."  The DOE  (through the CDEP) funds research related to fire
and explosion.
    The Greater London Council  (GLC) was established in 1965 to be responsible
for London fire service, refuse disposal, highways and traffic planning, and
structure planning.  The GLC had absolute control over planning for Inner
London and strategic planning control for outlying areas.  The GLC also
coordinated efforts to bring derelict, damaged and vacant land into beneficial
use.  The GLC, until abolition  in March  1986, was responsible for the
development of Thamesmead.
    For any property considered by the GLC  for purchase or redevelopment, a
site history was prepared  and,  if appropriate, a site investigation conducted.
An Inter-Departmental Assessment  Panel comprising GLC Officers from several
departments and disciplines was assembled to determine on the basis of  the
information from the site  investigation  and history whether  the site presents •
any form  of environmental  hazard  to  site users and developers.  The Panel's
recommendations regarding  necessary  remedial works were stated in a formal
report which,  after review, was provided to developers and contractors
interested in  the  site.  The  Inter-departmental Assessment Panel continued  to
                  the site as remedial work, and development proceeded.
                     suggested guidelines for use during site assessments to
be involved with
    The GLC in 1979
define various levels of soil contamination.  The degree of soil contamination
is classified as "uncontaminated," "slight contamination," "contamination,"
"heavy contamination," or  "unusually heavy contamination."  The ranges of
contaminant levels corresponding to the various classifications are based on
comparison with typical "uncontaminated" soils rather than on an assessment,
as in the case with the ICRCL guidelines.

-------
       The case studies for England arl the Corby Steelworks in the town of Corby
   in Northamptonshire in the English *iidlands;  the Wandsworth Gas Works,  London;
   and the planned community of Thamesnlead on  the Thames  River in London.
   Experience at these sites Ulu.tr.tJ the manner in which certain problems were
   dealt with during site reclamation a|nd  redevelopment.
       The Corby Steelworks  operated frjom  the  1930's until  1979.   When  the steel
   mill closed,  some 7500  jobs  were  lost prompting an intensive marketing  and
   redevelopment  program by  the town  to provide  suitable  sites to attract  new
   industries  to  Corby.  The Corby district  Council  acquired the  steelworks  site
   for  redevelopment.  At  several tracts of  land  formerly occupied by the  steel
  works (or its ancillary operations),
site reclamation to deal with
  contamination had to precede any redevelopment activity.  Redevelopment areas
  on formerly contaminated land includj:  the Weldon Industrial Area (formerly  '
  worked for minerals and used as a coil-handling and stocking area); the
  Earlstrees Industrial area (used before the 1950's for mining); the Phoenix
  Park industrial Area (which includes the site of the old sintering plant and
  coking ovens),-and the Willow Brook Pa>rk Industrial Area (which includes an
  area used for disposal of slurry waste from various steel processes and a
  former  coking plant  site).   Chemical
                                       contaminants  found in the various areas
 of  the  former  steel mill property  included  heavy metals,  cyanides,  sulfur
 salts, naphthalene and other volatile
organics, coal tar, various oily wastes.
 Phenols and asbestos.  The  site reclamation plan was developed on  the basis of
 a detailed site assessment  to. determine the extent of the contamination.
 Guidelines developed by the Greater London Council (GLC) were used in the
 assessment.
     Considerable excavation was required with most of the excavated material
 redeposited at different on-site locations.  "Special Waste" and heavily
 contaminated waste were transported offsite to licensed facilities for
 disposal.   The GLC guidelines for tot^l cyanide and for toluene extractable
 contaminants were applied to determinj the extent of  the excavation and the
 appropriate disposition of buried materials.
     Future use plans for the reclaimed
 industrial  development that will provide jobs.   The fact that the sites
'offered in  Corby are,  in many cases,  reclaimed  contaminated land does not
 appear  to have  any  influence on  the attractiveness  of  the redevelopment
 properties.
                                        steel mill site focus primarily on

-------
    The Wandsworth Gas Works produced gas from coal for about 100 years.   The
gas works site extended some 550 meters along the Thames River.  Parts of the
site were reclaimed from river marsh by filling with process wastes such as
spent iron oxide from gas cleanup.  The site was purchased by the GLC for
development as housing.  Based on findings of extensive contamination in a
site assessment in 1976, the GLC determined that redevelopment of the site
should be for less sensitive land use.  Contamination from coal tar is
believed to pose the most serious potential hazard at the site.
    Excavations on a portion of the site  in conjunction with road building
revealed extensive obstructions below ground  from the  former gas works.
Disturbing  these buried foundations,  tanks, pipelines, pits, and other struc-
tures was considered  to pose a major  pollution  problem and  a direct exposure  .
hazard to workers.  Because of these  problems,  the GLC Inter-Departmental
Assessment  Panel  recommended,  "reduction of  site disturbance to the minimum
possible."   Sufficient remedial work was carried out in 1983 to insure  that
 contamination from the gas works did not pose a hazard to the  surrounding
 areas.   The most heavily contaminated soils  were excavated and removed to a
 licensed landfill.   The site was covered with clean fill to a  depth of 1.1
 meters.  Portions of the site are scheduled for redevelopment  for light
 industry to provide jobs in the area.
     A refuse transfer station has been constructed on a 20-hectare (49 acres)
 tract at the western end of the site.  Remedial measures must precede any
 redevelopment of the remainder of the site occupied by the gas works.
     Some 400.hectares  (988 acres) of  the Thamesmead development are on the
 site of the  former Royal Arsenal in Woolwich.   The extent of  the contamination
 from the old arsenal activities was  first recognized  in  1975.  Vast quantities
 of industrial waste  and wastes  from  the  manufacture of town gas and
 electricity  were left  at various  locations on  the site.  Among the activities
 that had taken place on the  site were manufacture and testing of weapons and
 explosives,  metal working and plating,  manufacture  of acetylene,  development
 and  testing of paints,  and storage of coal  stocks.   Chemical  contaminants of
 concern at the  site  include  heavy metals,  coal tars,  oils,  phenols,  sulfur
  salts,  free and complexed cyanides,  combustible materials and asbestos.

-------
     For the purposes of development
 a number of areas, each with its o
                                   >wn
                                     the Thamesmead site has been divided into
                                     characteristics and planned use.  About
40 percent of the site had been developed by 1985.  When complete, Thamesmead
is planned to accommodate some 40,000 people, including homes, recreation and
shopping, and local employment on ptkrpose built industrial estates.
Recommendations for remedial measures are proposed based on projected long-
term hazards to site users.
 Wales, United Kingdom
     The Principality of Wales is po]
                                    itically united with England, .and the two
 countries have shared common systems  of law and government for nearly 450
 years.  The legislative Acts of Parliament in effect in England also apply to
 Wales.  The largest category of derelict sites in Wales involves coal wastes.
 Because so little land in Wales is Suitable for development due to the steep
 slopes,  there is pressure to develop  any unused land,  particularly in or near
 towns, and to reclaim derelict land.  In the narrow valleys characteristic of
 the mining areas,  level ground is primarily occupied by surface works,  and
 mining wastes are tipped on the valley sides.
     In 1966,  a tragic event occurred  at the village of Aberfan in Wales.   A
 mountainside  tip of colliery waste, made unstable by heavy rains,  avalanched
 down the mountain,  engulfing a school and several homes and killing 144
 people,  mostly children.   This disaster began  a determined and ambitious  drive
 to  alleviate  dangerous dereliction ii Wales and to restore contaminated land
 to  productive and beneficial use.
    The Central Government of  the U.:
both England and Wales.  The role of
the role of the DOE in England.  The
                                    C. establishes environmental policy, in
                                    the Welsh Office in Wales is analogous to
                                    Environmental Protection Division within
the Welsh Office  (headquartered in Cardiff) is responsible for administering
the environmental programs in Wales including programs pertaining to
contaminated land.
    The Welsh Development Agency  (WD|) is empowered to make grants to County
and District Councils for the purpose of reclaiming derelict land.  These
grants can be authorized to meet the entire cost of reclamation schemes
promoted by Local'Authorities, including land acquisition costs and

-------
administrative costs incurred in the planning and execution of projects.
Individuals and companies may also apply for reclamation grants from the WDA.
The costs required to bring such sites to a "greenfield" state are eligible
for these grants.  The WDA also engages in site redevelopment.
    In 1983, the Welsh Office and the WDA co-sponsored a survey of sites that
are believed to be contaminated.  Information for the survey was culled from
available reference material on industries in Wales, from maps and aerial
surveys and from local knowledge.  Emphasis was placed on contaminated sites
of 0.5 hectares  (1.2 acres) or larger; sites currently in beneficial uses were
excluded.  More than 700 sites were cataloged during the initial survey, and
additional updates and expansion of the data base are planned.
    The Lower Swansea Valley near the south coast of Wales  is described in
detail in a case study.  From the beginning of the 18th century, the port of
Swansea was an important shipping outlet  for coal from the  South Wales Coal
Field.  The Lower Swansea Valley became a major center for  smelting of copper,
zinc, and other metals and  later for steel and tin plate production.  The
heavy industrial activity in the Valley ceased after World  War  II, leaving the
Valley in a polluted, derelict  state.  It was estimated in  1964, that
approximately 162 hectares  (400 acres) within the Lower Swansea Valley were
covered by waste tips containing some  5 million tons of industrial waste.  The
severe air pollution and soil  contamination had killed most of  the vegetation.
The  large number of  tips restricted access through  parts of=the area.   The
various  tipped wastes contained high levels of copper and  zinc  as well  as
antimony, arsenic,  cadmium and lead.
     The  Lower  Swansea Valley Project was  initiated  in  1961  to address  the
dereliction and contamination in  the Valley and  to  begin  the planning  for
 future development.   Among the recommendations of the project that  influenced
 later work  were:  an accurate and detailed base map,  visual improvements
 through  planting trees  and grasses,  statement of the need for a single body to
 acquire  all the land to be redeveloped,  and planning for  the Valley that
 included housing and recreation as well as industry.
     The  first major reclamation schemes were undertaken beginning in 1966 when
 Swansea was designated a Development Area,  qualifying the area for financial
 assistance from Central Government to reclaim derelict land for industrial
 development.  The policy was to clear the derelict land,  return the land to
  Lctive use, and encourage new and m
                                           T1»-ll 1 C!i~ f~\r t~
                                                          area.
                                       n

-------
      The period 1968 to 1974 brought acquisition of land and implementation of'
  major reclamation schemes.   The earlkest reclamation projects were carried out
  on the periphery of the Project Area   Access to the center areas gradually
  improved as  reclamation and infrastructure  projects proceeded.   By 1974,  the
  Local Authority had acquired some  330  hectares (815 acres)  of land and the
  reclamation  programs were substantially complete for 172 hectares (425'acres).
  Additional land clearance,  reclamation,  infrastructure, amenity  planting,  and
  industrial promotion were carried  out  between 1974  and  1983  supported  by  grant
  aid  from the WDA, and  other sources.
 Sweden
     The Ministry of Environment and Energy is responsible for environmental
 programs throughout Sweden.  Environmental policy is implemented through
 permits and National physical planning.  Environmental issues are among the
 highest rated priorities of the Swedish general public.  Except for some sites
 in metropolitan areas,  however, the reuse of contaminated land in Sweden has
 not been a major focus  of concern.
     The Central Organization of Swedish Communities has completed a national
 inventory of oil dumps  and landfills.   In all,  3,800 properties have been
 registered including about 500  that a:re believed to represent a potential
 threat to man and the environment.  High priorities have been assigned to .
 about  20 dump sites.
     Two sites are addressed in  case studies.  These are the  Augustendal
 Dumpsite in Nacka,  a  suburb of  Stockholm,  and the BT-Kemi- Pesticide Plant,
 near Malmo,  in southern  Sweden.  The cleanup of  the BT-Kemi  site was the  first
 remedial action project  in Sweden.
    The Augustendal Dumpsite was used
demolition waste from about 1940 unti:
2 hectares  (5 acres), is estimated to
including paints, varnishes, solvents.
methane generation was determined to be present as a result of the decomposing
municipal waste.
for the disposal of municipal waste and
 1965.  The dumpsite, which covers about
hold about 80,000 cubic meters of waste,
 mercury and other metals.  A risk of
                                     11

-------
    The city plan for development of the former dumpsite includes a school and
about 1100 residences in buildings with two to five floors.  To insure that
the site is safe and to alleviate the need for piles,  all waste materials
present on the intended school site were excavated down to firm bottom (as
deep as 8 meters).  The excavated contaminated soil was transported to a
licensed disposal facility.  Excavated material that was determined to be
nontoxic was used as fill at the opposite end of the valley.  Some wastes
containing mercury were placed at the bottom of the fill area and covered with
lime followed by 40 centimeters of clay.
    At the BT-Kemi Plant site large quantities of phenoxy acid herbicides were
produced from 1966 through 1977.  During the plant's operation, production
wastewaters were collected in holding ponds, and treated solid residues were
buried on the site.  Before the plant ceased operation, some 600 drums,
corroded and leaking, were discovered.  These, as well as the holding ponds
were leaking into the Braan River.  Cleanup of the site was initiated to
protect the River and groundwater and to prepare the site  for redevelopment
for light industry.  A  site investigation revealed chlorinated organic
chemicals leaking into  the river.  The  two uppermost aquifers beneath the  site
were also found  to be contaminated.
    To protect the River, a drainage system enclosed by a  bentonite  shield was
installed around the area to prevent infiltration of water.  Within  a year,
this system had  effectively stopped the leakage of contaminants  into the
river.  The drainage water  in  the holding pond was collected and treated  in an
activated charcoal  system  to reduce contaminant levels.  Contaminated  soil was
cleaned by  a  technique  of  forced leaching through  an  infiltration ditch.
Treatment  is  expected to continue until at  least the year  2000.
     Severely  contaminated soil and waste were transported  out  of Sweden for
 incineration.   Some 90  drums  of low-level  dioxin waste remain  at the site
 since  no  acceptable means  of  disposal  of this material can be  found.
                                      12

-------
    The
                                  *— * Populated county in surop..
                                                                          The
                    manufacturing•(iron
                                       and steel and aluminum)
                                                                         -
                                                                              -
     York.
        years,
 Netherlands is a parliamentary democracy
     Because of the scarcity of -land Jn the Netherlands^
    "  "                             I.    .  .   ~
     ,                                ^ipalities,  nave oeen used for manv

Neth!rlSar L0rvrVhan  °nS  ^   I  USSV C°ntaminated ^
densitv  hh= »-.«-•   ** * ^^ ^"l  S  problem  because of the high population
 ensxty, the relate scarcity of land,  the high water  table  in many parts of
the country, and the reliance  on groukdwater for drinking  supplies
Protection of groundwater  is of specif1 concern  in the  Netherlands'
    A survey of contaminated sites in 1980 identified more than 4,000      '
                                                          or.   an  ,
  pot.nt.auy oonta»inat.a site,.  ln .L  about 350  inTeatlgations
                                                       to ahout  „„
   eanup operation, Were st«tea at .  oet                 ou      a
    1985 it was .stated that ursent kanup m,asur.s „«. ne.a.a at
 .        The Mjor types of contaminated sites ia.ntifi.a are wast,
                                                                             „...
                                                                          !,„
a 5-year program of measures aimed at
be overseen by the Ministry of Housing
                                                              ana other
  sce,      ""
     The Soil  Promotion BiX! which oec. law on .anuary X,  1984 proviaes for
     -ear
                                        protecting the soil.   The program is to
                                          Physical Planning,  and the
               The policy regarfing soil  prot.ction  is  that  th. soil must
 r.t,ln its abiUty to perform a wia. vjri.ty of  function, ad.^at.ly.   The
 creation of ground-water protection arias i, , short-ter,, policy objective
     Under the <3/-,-i i  /-T	 , _ .   .  .                                 J v"-4-v<=:-
           th. soii   .Mup  I»t.rlm) ao  _ into ^^ ^
 1583,  th. Prov.no.al Authorities ,r. rj^ir.d to subn.it each y.ar to th.
Ministry of Housing,  Physical Planning,
                                        and th. Environment a cl.anup program
 (._  j^,   ..,    .                                 -"•" wimi.su i. 
-------
    The soil Cl.»n-up V* was lat.r incorporated in the Soil Protection Bill
Cleanup costs ,r. shared by central government, the province,, municipalities,
a I ..Lin industries.  The Ministry of Health and Bnvironm.ntal Protection
normally contribute, approximately 90 percent of th. cleanup operations.  In
 ome instances/an  industry  is responsible for paying the cost of c eanup  and
the government -11 collect  the payment from th. responsible party after the
cleanup is completed.   - central Covert  has  budgeted  e^iva len   to  bout
„,. million, U.S.  for the program over a  IS-y.ar  period to prov.de for s,t.
clean-ups  and also for the Central Covert's progr» in  research,  standards
development,  analysis, and coordination to insure  consistency in the  cleanup
      he' Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning, an, th. environment has «1933,
 developed guideline to be used in sit. investigations to assess the degree
 contalation.  soil contamination mean, there is , cheMcal in the ground
 .needing th. level »or»ally .xp.ct.d to occur.  Constituents for wn.ch
 guidelines are developed are recognized as indicators of pollution.
    T. capacity  of d.anup installations in The Ketn.rlands is insuffic.en
 to treat all the  excavated contaminated soil from  sit.  cleanups.  As a result,
 storage of  a consid.rabl.  amount of mat.ri.l is necessary whil. awaits
 processing.   It  is .stimat.d that Th. H.th.rlands  has 1.5 »ilUo» tons of
  contaminate soil from old gas «*. «»d an .v.n  greater quantity of soil
  polluted with oil .                                                     .
      Th. contaminated land problem in the Netherlands first cam. to pubUc
  attention in »,S »ith th. discovery of serious soil contamination near homes
  in th. to»» of I-M-rto*.  «- cont^inated area  (8.9 hectares  [22 acres,)
  underlies 268 houses.
      Ovations  in th. area r.v.al.d chemical waste buried in containers and
  in bul* in  trenches and pits.   Th. wastes deposited  at L.tterk.r,  ««
  ^ a  variety of  industries including the building industry, p.mts and varn.sn
  manufacture, paint spraying,  plastics manufacture and processing^ chemical
   industry,  and printing in* manufacture  «,d application.   Soils adjacent     the
   buriedlstes were also polluted.  Pollutants ».r. found beneath houses, ,ust
   below the  floor.
       Th. remediation activities involved th. »c,vation and r.moval of 93.800
    cubic meters of  contaminated soil.  This material was proc.ss.d in a domestic
    refuse incinerator at Rotterdam.
                                        14

-------
      No polluting materials were allowed to, remain at Lekkerkerk.  The total
  cost of the remediation work at Lekkerkerk amounted to about $65 million U.S.
  paid by the Netherlands Central government.   If Lekkerkerk were discovered
  today,  the remedial action for the site would likely be very different as the
  cost of such a program cannot be justified ($242,000 per house).
      Other case studies of contaminatjed sites  in the Netherlands include
  Delfshaven,  an older area of Rotterdam Harbour where a special  infilling
  technique is being used to provide land for housing;  Merwedepolder,  Dordrecht,
  where remedial action was undertaken  after a  housing development was built
  over a  former chemical waste dump;  and the Tilburg  Gas Works where extensive
  excavations'were necessary to reclaim the  site  for  housing.
      The Tilburg Gas Works produced  gas  from coal for more than  100 years on a
  5.5  hectare  (13 acre)  site' that  is  njw  in  central Tilburg.  The  plant also
 produced coke  as well  as  byproduct  tars, benzene, toluene, naphthalene, and
 ammonia.' Site investigations were a
 site history were studied to identic
.rried out in 1982.  Available maps and
 areas where contamination was likely to
 be most concentrated.  Samples were tUen both at the surface and at depth on
 a 10 x 10 meter grid.  Chemical analyses revealed the presence of volatile
 aromatics, polynuclear aromatic hydrJcarbons,  and cyanides.   Tar and oil
 products polluted large areas to a depth of 4  meters.  The PH of water at the
 site measured 2.5 due to the presence
 of hydrogen sulfide.   Coal and sinters
 covered several acres of the site.
     The remediation work was carried out  during the  winter 1984-1985  and in
 October and November of 1985.   The  exlavations  were  performed  during  the
 winter  in order to  minimize  worker  exposure  to  volatile contaminants.   During
 the  winter  1984-1985 a total of 28,18^ cubic meters  of polluted soil  were
 excavated and transported off-site  for temporary storage and thermal
 treatment.
     Guidelines  from the Ministry suggested that contamination should be
cleaned up to background levels.  All
meters was removed.  Excavations were
the water table) to reduce contaminant
contamination of the aquifer.
detectable pollution to a depth of 2
also carried out to lower depths  (below
 levels and to minimize further

-------
Federal Republic of Germany
    Prior to the German unification of October 1990, the Federal Republic of
Germany  (FRG) was somewhat smaller than the state of Oregon in the U.S. and
has a population of just over 61 million people.  The country includes ten
states plus the territory of Berlin.  The individual states (Lander) enjoy
considerable political autonomy.
    The  Federal Environmental Agency, Umweltbundesampt, headquartered  in
Berlin was responsible for establishing basic environmental policies for the
FRG, although  the  individual Lander  implemented  their own programs.  The
Federal  Waste  Disposal Act,  issued  in 1972, requires wastes to be disposed of
in a way that  avoids  environmental  damage.
    The  German word "Altlasten"  (meaning  old burdens)  is used to refer to
environmentally  hazardous waste  disposal  problem sites.  Although the  total
number of sites'containing  hazardous materials  is quite  large,  the  subset of
waste  disposal problem sites was estimated in  1983, to be  less  than 1,000.
 Investigations and possibly remedial action is  needed at  these  sites.
     Although there are no official guidelines  to assess  soil  contamination  in
 the FRG, threshold levels for certain heavy metals are recognized based on
 average  levels found in soils.  These normally occurring and acceptable levels
 derive from a literature search and recommendations published in 1977.
     The discussion of reclamation and redevelopment in the FRG addresses three
 different areas: the City-State of Hamburg, the Ruhr District,  and the Central
 and South Regions.  The programs for environmental planning reflect the very
 different geographical features of these areas.  The concerns in Hamburg, a
 city of over  a million people, differ from the  issues of the Ruhr district
 Which is marked by many small to medium-sized industrial towns situated cheek
 to jowl.  The Central and Southern  regions include substantial rural  areas as
 well as  several very large  industries.
     The Ruhr  District  (Ruhrgebiet)  in the  state of Nordrhein-Westfalen is
 perhaps the largest  industrial  area in Europe.   Environmental problems
 associated with the  residue from more than 100  years  of heavy  industrial
 activity (i.e.,  coal industry,  iron and  steel working, chemicals manufacture)
  are
prevalent throughout the Ruhrgebiet.  Contaminated land in the Ruhrbegiet
     often reclaimed for new industrial use,
                                       but with stringent controls'aimed
  at softening the environmental impacts on the region.
                                       16

-------
      Five sites are described  in case
  Hamburg, was used as a dumping area after World War II.  After arsenic
 studies.   The Havighorster Moor site,  in
                                      I
  contamination was found in a nearby stream, an extensive cleanup operation was
  undertaken by the State.  The source
  to a permitted facility or isolated m a specially designed pit on-site.
  After the cleanup was completed, new
 of  the arsenic  contamination  was  removed
problems at the site became apparent.
  Low levels of chlorinated organics were found in water seeping from the site
  A new remediation scheme has been .pljnned to treat the contaminated water
  using an aquatic plant (Phragmites communis).
      At the site in Bielefeld in the ijuhr District,  buried industrial waste has
  been discovered in a housing development.   Methane resulting from municipal
  waste formerly dumped at the site is
also of concern.  The town has offered to
  purchase  the  homes  of any owner who wishes  to relocate.
     At an industrial  site in  Dortmond,  a major cleanup  is underway in which
  contaminated  soil and water are mixed with  lignite  fly ash  in a patented
  process.   The resulting mixture hardens to  a  concrete-like  mass and is
  disposed  on-site in a lined pit.
     Additional case studies describe
:he  remedial  actions  at  an urban site
 contaminated with diesel fuel and an industrial site where residues from
 Lindane production were deposited.

 CONCLUSIONS

 The Role of Central Government-.
     Generally,  central governments are
 regarding the cleanup of contaminated
 responsible for formulating policy
sites.  The actual cleanups, however.
 are  carried out  by local  authorities  in most  instances.   Government
 regulations are  established  in  each country to  control the disposal  of
 contaminated materials.   The Central  governments  in Wales, Sweden, and  the
 Netherlands have conducted surveys of contaminated sites  to assess the  extent
 of contaminated land.  Efforts were alko made to prioritize sites based on
 their potential impacts on people and :he environment.  Such surveys in
 England and in the FRG have  been limited to specific regions or
municipalities.

-------
    Of the cleanup efforts investigated for this report in England,  Wales,  and
the Netherlands, almost all were financed through funding programs made
available through the Central Government of the respective country.  In most
cases, a small percentage of the total rehabilitation cost (typically 10
percent) is bourne by local governments.  A notable exception to this usual
funding arrangement is the site reclamation work carried out in the
Netherlands by the Municipality of Rotterdam.

Very Large Sites

    Three sites that are  treated  in detail  in  case studies encompass areas
exceeding 100 hectares  (247  acres).   These  are Thamesmead, London,  England;
Corby  Steelworks, Northamptonshire,  England;  and the  Lower  Swansea Valley,
West Glamorgan, Wales.  Although  each of these sites  is  subdivided into many
smaller areas  for specific reclamation work,  the success of  the  various
individual  reclamation and redevelopment efforts is dependent  on the overall
reclamation scheme for the area.   Common ownership by a  single authority  and  a
coordinated master plan for site  reclamation have been vital to  the success of
the redevelopment of these areas.
     Because the quantity of contaminated soil and  debris is  so great at these
 large sites, the cost of complete removal of the contaminated material would
 be prohibitive.  The master plan for reclamation and redevelopment at these
 sites include containment areas for on-site disposal of large quantities of
 contaminated materials.

 Response When Contamination Impacts Current Land Use

     At three of  the sites addressed  in  case studies,  the remedial  actions were
 prompted by concern over potential adverse health effects from  exposure to
 contaminants present  in  the ground beneath private homes.   These  sites are
 Lekkerkerk  and Merwedepolder  in  The  Netherlands and Brake in  the  Ruhr  region
 of the FRG.  Residential developments were constructed  over buried industrial
 chemical waste.   The  Local  Municipalities  were considered responsible  for  the
                                       18

-------
  developments  since  they had granted
planning permission for the developments
  in spite of the buried waste.  The remedial efforts at Merwedepolder and Brake
  were still being discussed in 1985.
  contaminated soil were removed from
 At Lekkerkerk, all buried waste and
the housing area.
      At Brake and Merwedepolder, the Local Authorities offered to purchase, at
  market prices, all the houses affected by the buried waste in order that the
  people might relocate.  Most of the occupants elected to sell and move because
  of the fear of long-term chronic effects from prolonged exposure to the buried
  toxic wastes.
      Although the presence of toxic materials near homes at Lekkerkerk,
  Merwedepolder,. and Brake is clearly Established,  there is no medical evidence
  of serious adverse effects from expoiure in any of the inhabitants.   'Of
  course,  it cannot be  proved that advirse effects  would not occur in  the
  exposed  population if exposure  were Continued.  The psychological  impacts
  resulting  from fear of exposure to t
-------
some cases, (e.g., Thamesmead, gas works site)  the site assessment led to the
conclusion that it was best to allow the contaminated site to remain
undisturbed.  Factors leading to such a conclusion include:  uncertainty as to
the extent of excavation necessary to ensure that future users of the site
would not be exposed to chemical contaminants,  the high cost and the
uncertainty of the cost to carry out the site reclamation, and worker safety
during site excavation.

The Problem of Extremely Hazardous Waste

    The  disposal  of  dioxin-contaminated waste poses  a serious problem
throughout Europe.   No satisfactory  means  for its disposal has been approved
 in Sweden or  Germany.   Until there is  a safe, approved method  for destruction
or disposal,  storage of the material must  continue.   As the  volume of stored
 dioxin-contaminated waste increases, so does the likelihood  of  accidental
 release and exposure.   An important need for the European community is an
 inventory of  the stored dioxin waste,  an estimate of the extent of such waste
 that remains  buried, and an agreement regarding the final disposal or
 destruction of dioxin  wastes.

 On-Site Disposal Versus Removal

     Only a few sites were encountered where waste is being treated for
 disposal on-site.   One such site, the  industrial  site  near Dortmund,  involved
 on-site treatment of  contaminated waste and soil.   Soils  were treated by
 mixing with brown coal fly  ash.   The mixture hardens  as  it cools  and the
 solidified material retains the  contaminants,  even  if exposed to water.   At
 the B.T.  Kemi site  in Sweden,  a  forced leaching technique was applied to
 remove  chemicals (phenoxyacids)  from  low  and medium contaminated soils.   At
 all other sites, the  cleanups involved excavation followed  by  treatment and/or
 disposal at  licensed off-site facilities  for  the most highly  contaminated
 waste and soil.   Less severely contaminated material (a notably subjective
  description)  was usually disposed of in a semi-isolated cell  on-site.
                                       20

-------
 Criteria for Cleanup
     None of the countries addressed
 limits for contaminants in soil,  nor
 determining whether a given site  is
 have been developed in England and i:
in this report have established statutory
 are there generally applicable rules for
suitable for a specific use.   Guidelines
i the Netherlands to be applied in site
 assessments when  contaminated soil  is  encountered.   in  England,  the
guidelines,  called Tentative  Trigger
 Concentrations,  developed by the ICRCL,
are recognized  for  site assessments  throughout the U.K.  The Trigger
Concentrations  pertain to  specific contaminant levels  in soils below which a
site could be regarded as  uncontaminited.  In the Netherlands, soil assessment
levels are recommended by  the Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and the
Environment.  These guidelines all emphasize the importance of site
-investigations  and assessments.
    Protection  of groundwater is of  foremost concern in the Netherlands and in
the FRG.  A large portion of drinkind water in these countries is taken from
groundwater.
                                    21

-------
                                   SECTION 3
                            ENGLAND,  UNITED KINGDOM
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

      England is the predominant country of the Island, of Great Britain  and of
the political entity called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland  (U.K.).  The U.K.  is a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary
democracy which includes England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. The
term  "Britain" is commonly used to  refer to England.  The term is  ambiguous,
however; sometimes  "Britain" refers to the U.K. as a whole, sometimes to the
social entity called  "Great Britain."  The characteristics of  the  British Con-
stitution, which is largely unwritten, derive mainly  from England. ^This is
because  historically,  England  conquered and to  some extent  imposed its
institutions on Wales  and  Ireland.   Scotland, although part of the U.K.  has
kept  its own distinctive  legal system,  largely  based  on  Roman  law.
      England occupies an  area of  130,439  square  kilometers  (50,363 square
miles),  somewhat  larger than  the  State  of  New York in the United States.,
England  (shown  in  Figure 2)  is bounded  on  the north by Scotland;  on the west
by the Irish Sea,  Wales,  and St.  George's  Channel;  on the  east by the North
Sea,  and on the south by the English Channel.   The English Channel separates
Great Britain  from Continental Europe by only 32  kilometers at its narrowest
point.
      With a population of nearly 47 million (more than four-fifths of  the
 total U.K. population), England's population density is about 15  times  higher
 than that of  the U.S.  In Europe,  only The Netherlands is more densely
 populated than England.  About
 considered urban,  of which






 September 1987 by Mr. Beckett, Mr. Lowe, and Mr. Smith.

                                       22
    90 percent of the English population is
about a third live in several large conurbations

-------
         NORTHERN
          IRELAND
Figure 2.   Map of the U.K.

-------
(aggregations or continuous networks of urban communities).   The Greater
London Conurbation is by far the largest and most significant urban area.
London is a major port and the center of government, industry, and finance.
      During the 18th and 19th centuries, England was among the first of the
European countries to undergo an industrial revolution.  Massive urbanization
and social and environmental problems that accompanied this industrial
development still affect British life.  Today, England is one of the most
industrialized nations of the world.
      As a result of industrial development and many years of urban and
suburban population concentrations, the problems of environmental pollution—
air, water, land, and noise—have become subjects of-much concern in the U.K.,
especially in the major urban areas of England.  In particular, the
reclamation and redevelopment of contaminated land  is recognized as an
important issue of modern development.  The potential problems associated with
redeveloping contaminated sites were  recognized earlier  in England than  in the
United States.
      Historical records of  land use  in  England go  back  about 200 years.
However, there has not been  a systematic inventory  to determine the number of
sites that are potentially contaminated.  To date,  the number of such sites  is
unknown.  Contaminated sites in England  include old mining sites; former steel
works, coking plants, wood preserving operations, chemical works, tanneries,
asbestos works, and other  industrial  sites; paper and printing works; scrap
yards; petroleum refineries; waste  disposal sites;  former gas works; munitions
and testing  sites; railway  land  (e.g., maintenance  areas, large sidings, and
depots); and sewage works  and farms.   The extent of the  contamination on many
sites  is complicated because they  have experienced  multiple  uses over several
decades.
       The U.K.  government  involves  legislative,  executive and judiciary
elements with many overlapping  functions; there  is  no  separation of powers as
in the U.S.   The U.K's  Head of  State  is  the reigning Monarch,  and the Head of
Government  is the  Prime  Minister.   The Prime  Minister  heads  the Cabinet  and
appoints the Cabinet Ministers,  all of whom are  elected  members of  Parliament
and hold equal  rank.   Sovereignty,  expressed  in  legislative  enactments,
resides  in  Parliament,  which comprises the Monarch, the  House of Lords,  and
the elected House  of  Commons.   Legislative Acts  of  Parliament are binding  on
all.  Programs  relating to the  redevelopment  of  contaminated land are the
responsibility of  Central Government  as  well  as  Local  Authorities.
                                       24

-------
 Legislative Acts of Parliament Dealing With Contaminated Land
       Since 1936, there have been Bri
 contaminated sites where public healt
 early as 1947 led to the introduction
 The various legislative acts of Parli
tish laws to prohibit building on
i might be at risk.   Several legislative
 acts of Parliament relate to the management of land in England and Wales and
 provide for reclamation of con'taminat
 d land.   The pressure on land use as
 of comprehensive planning legislation.
 jnent  described below provide the
 framework for dealing with contaminated "land in England and Wales.  Separate
 Acts are in force in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

 The Public Health Act—
       The Public.Health Act of 1936, Section 54,  prohibits building on land
 where "putrescible,  noxious,  or polluting material has been deposited, unless
 such material has  been rendered innocvious."  Enforcement of these provisions
 is by the Local Authority,  and interpretation varies widely.  Awareness that a
 site is contaminated is necessary in order to enforce the regulation.

 The Town and Country Planning Act--
       The Town and Country  Planning Act of 1947 was enacted because of the
 pressure on land use.   It set forth trie requirements of comprehensive planning
 as it is practiced today in the U.K. 'Under this  Act all new developments are
 subject to planning  permission.   The Act requires Local Planning Authorities
 to produce plans in  which the projected land use  patterns for the subject area
 are set down.   The Act  also encourages  Local Authorities to include in all new
 permissions for mineral extraction  a condition requiring restoration of. the
 site.                  .                                     .
       The  Town and Country  Planning Act  of  1968 requires the preparation of
 "structure"  and "local"  plans.   Structure plans outline utilities and types of
land use; local plans provide specific
 details of development.   These planning
activities are the responsibility of the counties and districts, respectively.-
      The Town and Country Planning Act of 1971 empowers Local Authorities to
control most forms of development including development of contaminated land.
It is recommended that planning authorities include "measures for the improve-
ment of the physical environment."  Thi
Order (1977) requires consultation wit!
certain planning applications are made
quality.
;  Town and Country General Development
i  Regional Water  Authorities  when
which may affect or threaten water
                                      25

-------
The Countryside Act—
      The Countryside Act of 1968 requires local authorities to regard
conservation and amenities in the countryside and to safeguard water supplies.

Deposit of Poisonous Wastes Act--
      The Deposit of Poisonous Wastes Act of 1972 addresses the disposal of
hazardous wastes in the U.K.

Control of Pollution Act  (COPA)—
      The disposal of all controlled wastes, including surplus excavated
material from development sites, is regulated under the Control of Pollution
Act  (COPA) of 1974.  The COPA provides  for a waste survey and waste disposal
plan and mandates waste disposal site licensing provisions.  Site licensing is
the primary means of regulating the disposal of all controlled wastes.  The
license specifies the types, quantities (total and annual) and other
particulars of  the wastes to be deposited.  The COPA  licensing procedure went
into effect in  1976.  As  a  result  of this  legislation, uncontrolled waste
dumps should no longer be operational.   (In practice,  standards of operation
and the enforcement of  licensing conditions are highly variable.)
      Also authorized under this Act,  "Special Wastes," are  recognized because
they are ,"sufficiently  hazardous to present a potential threat of serious
human injury  or death  if  encountered during movement  between their point of
arising and proper  place  of disposal"  (DOE, Waste Management Paper No. 23,
1981).  Such  wastes are defined by reference  to  certain properties
flammability,  carcinogenicity,  corrosivity, and  toxicity.   Specific
regulations  related to  transit and associated record- keeping apply  to
 "Special  Wastes."

Health and Safety at Work Act —
       The Health and Safety at Work Act of 1974  requires  employers  to ensure
 the health,  safety,  and welfare at work of all employees.   This  includes
workers involved in site investigations and remedial measures.

 Derelict Land Act—
       The Derelict Land Act of 1982 encourages the redevelopment of
 contaminated and derelict land particularly where private sector development
 (housing, industry, or commerce) will  result.  Under this Act grants to cover
 up to 100 percent of the cost of land  reclamation and redevelopment are made
                                       '26

-------
  available to local authorities to purchase, and reclaim  sites  for beneficial
  use.   Grants up to 80 percent are also available to private developers for
  reclamation projects.  Total grants'Laid for derelict land reclamation schemes
  in  England was £4.75 million ($11.4 kllion U.S.) in 1980-81  and £9.38 million
  ($15.6 million U.S.) in 1981-82 (Bevan, 1983).

  Building  Act--

        The Building Act of 1985 empowers Local Authorities to  take actions  to
  prevent or to rectify building conditions that are detrimental to health or
  that pose a nuisance.   The 1985 BuilAing Regulations are to be enforced by the
 Local Authority.   For  a contaminated
 attack by aggressive chemicals in the
 measures to achieve adequate consoli(
 arising from contamination  of ground
 site,  foundations capable of resisting
!  soil  may be required as well as special
lation.   Hazards to building occupants
beneath a structure should be avoided.
 Authorities Dealing With Contaminated Land
       Central Government sets  environmental  policy for England and Wales and
 is responsible for programs related  to  various  legislative acts.  The work in
 environmental protection in the U.K.
 Government.
is carried out mostly outside of Central
 Department of the Environment  (DOE)--
       Within Central Government, .matters relating  to  contaminated land are
 overseen by two Directorates within the Department of the  Environment (DOE)
 The DOE is responsible for sponsoring
 legislation  (to be enacted by
 Parliament)  relating to environment matters.  The DOE makes policy,  advises
 Local  Authorities,,and serves as arbi
 Environmental  Protection Divisions wi
 Ireland  Department  of the Environment
 Development  Department]  which have sp
 respective geographical  territories.)
:er in disputes in England.   (There  are
;hin the Welsh Office, the Northern
  and the Scottish Office  [Scottish
icial responsibilities within their
      The DOE  is  headed by the Secretary of State for the Environment, a
Cabinet  level  position.   Within the DOE separate Ministers oversee programs
for Local Government  and for Housing and Construction.  Parliamentary Under
Note:  Here and throughout the report, budgets
efforts are given in the currency of the subiec
-rra ln&nv»TT^»  J_11	 _•   -,    .     .      -*
and expenditures associated with reclamation
it country  (e.g., British pounds £).  An equivalent

                                       27

-------
Secretaries,  (Junior Ministers) oversee programs for Sport and Recreation and
for Environmental Protection.  The DOE organization relating to environmental
protection employs about 400 people and includes two Directorates with
Divisions as  shown below:
      Directorates
      Air,  Noise, and Wastes
       Central Directorate on
         Environmental Pollution
         (CDEP)
Divisions
Radioactive waste
Radioactive Waste
Land Wastes
Air and Noise
(Administration)
(Professional)
Toxic Substances
Policy, Planning, and Coordination
International and Energy Statistics
  and Economics
      The  responsibility within  DOE  for  dealing with  issues  involving
 contaminated land rests  primarily with the  CDEP.   The DOE  also  supports  the
 Building Research Establishment  that provides  pertinent  information.   [Note:
 With the formation of Her Majesty's  Inspectorate  of Pollution (HMIP)  in  April
 1987, there has been some rearrangement  of  responsibilities  within DOE.]

 The Interdepartmental Committee  on the Redevelopment  of  Contaminated Land
 ICRCL)--
      The  Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Contaminated
 Land (ICRCL) was established in  1976 to  coordinate government activities
 relating to contaminated land.  Representation on this Committee includes the
 DOE; the Department of Health and Social Security; the Health and Safety
 Executive;  the Welsh Office; the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries,  and
 Food; and   (recently) the Scottish Development Department.  Several DOE
 functions  are represented in the ICRCL membership to provide appropriate
 expertise  and administrative interests including the CDEP, the Property
 Services Agency,the Building Research Establishment,  Housing Directorates, and
 Planning Directorates responsible for the administration of Derelict Land
 Grants.  As Secretariate to the  ICRCL, the CDEP provides advice to local
 authorities concerning contaminated  land.  The advice and assistance of the
 ICRCL is available throughout the U.K.

 Regional Water Authorities—
       Issues involving water resources are the responsibility of  the Regional
 Water Authorities, not of DOE.   Within the U.K.,  there are nine Regional Water
 Authorities in England,  seven in Scotland, one in Wales,  and one  in Northern
 Ireland.   The  statutory  duty of  the  Water Authorities is  to conserve water
                                        28

-------
 resources which  includes protecting
 Waters.  The COPA empowers Water Auti
 and to recover the costs from those

 Local Government—
                                     :he quality of both surface and ground
                                     lorities to forestall or remedy pollution
                                     responsible.
       Implementation of environmental, policies and laws within the U.K.  is  the
 responsibility of Local Government Authorities.. Historically, local
 government bodies in the U.K. included County  (Shire) Councils, County Borough
 Councils, (established in some large
 ordinary Borough Councils, and .Urban
                                      boroughs having a population of 100,000),
                                      District or Rural District Councils.   A
 major reorganization of local government, which had the effect of dissolving
 the powerful Borough Councils and gr
-------
Contaminated, Polluted, and Derelict Lands

      Programs in the U.K. distinguish between polluted, contaminated, and
derelict land, although these terms are not specifically defined by statute.
Several attempts have been made to articulate a complete, meaningful, and
operational definition of contamination as it relates to land reclamation.
The definition of contaminated land most commonly used  in the context of
development is "substances, that in sufficient concentrations or quantities
are likely to cause harm directly or indirectly to man, to the environment,
or, on occasions, to other targets."  In 1980, Mr. Michael Smith  (who at that
time was Secretary of  the ICRCL) observed that the problem of contaminated
land is "not the presence of contamination as such, but its presence  in an
amount which is judged to be excessive in relation to the current use of the
land or some change of use which is being contemplated"  (Smith, 1980a).
Beckett and  Simms  (1984)  introduced an operational definition of  contaminated
land to assist in planning land reclamation--"contaminated land is  that which
because of its former  uses, now contains substances that give rise  to the
principal hazards likely  to affect the proposed  form of development,  and which
requires an  assessment to decide whether it  requires some form of remedial
action, which may include changing the  layout or the form of the  development."
      A distinction has been made between pollution and contamination.  The
report of the Royal Commission on Environmental  Pollution defines pollution to
mean the actual damage, harm or  interference that man-introduced  substances
cause to the site and  to  the proposed uses;  "contamination  is  limited to  the
presence of  "alien" substances when  there  is no  intention or need to pass
judgment on  whether harm  or damage  has  been  or  is likely to be'caused (Royal
Commission on Environmental  Pollution,  1984).
      The  term "derelict" is  used in describing  many  contaminated sites.
Derelict  land is  not  necessarily contaminated,  however.  Dereliction implies
abandonment  rather than  contamination.   Contaminated  land is  a special
category  of  derelict  land.   Although contaminated land is not  always derelict,
there  is  some hesitancy  in labeling a site as contaminated if  it  is in
productive use.
       An awareness
                   of the problems associated with redeveloping contaminated
land in England began about 1970.  Before 1975, individual sites were being
dealt with under derelict land clearance programs.   Programs to aid in
systematic assessments and planning have been in place for more than a decade.
                                       30

-------
 At the national level, efforts have been directed toward three areas—
 promoting public awareness of the pojential problems inherent in redevelopment
 of contaminated land; developing guidance to assist in performing uniform
 assessments and data interpretation;
 investigations and remedial measures.
       Since the 1960's, a substantia]
 during its earlier use has become ava
and supporting research related to site

 amount of land that was contaminated
ilable for redevelopment.  Factors that
 influenced this availability are majcr changes in the steel, chemical, and
 railway industries and a switch from coal-derived gas to natural gas.  The
 number of gas works 'in the U.K. decreased from about. 1,000 in 1949 (when the
 industry was nationalized) to only 170 in 1969 (ICRCL,  1979, p. 2).   As most
 of the former gas works are located near the centers of urban areas,  these
 sites are very attractive for redevelopment.  Much of the land sold by British
 Gas during the last several years has been acquired by Local Authorities.
 Many sites have been reclaimed and redeveloped with the work being overseen by
 the responsible Local Authorities.
       Controls in the U.K.  have been
such that there has not been much fly-
 tipping (uncontrolled dumping).   As aj result,  the disposal of uncontrolled
 hazardous  waste has not been the focujs of attention as it has in the United
 States.   Nonetheless,  the presence of
 industrial  sites  is an important sour
 be  considered if  the site is to be re[
       Since' 1947,  any new development
 requires  permission from the Local Au
 disposed process wastes on former
:e of potential contamination that must
leve loped.
 or change in land use in England
:hority.'  There are some 330 planning
authorities  in  England.   These  authorities  often  call  on 'the  DOE (specifically
the CDEP)  for advice  and  assistance  regarding  contaminated land issues.   The
requirement  for documenting  land use
changes has  brought many  sites  to  the
listory  whenever  use  of  a property
 attention  of  the DOE.   Based on the
inquiries related to contaminated  land  from Local Authorities,  the  CDEP
estimates that there are perhaps 20,000 hectares  (50,000 acres) of  potentially
contaminated land in England that  warjant seeking additional  information.
This estimate is derived from inquiries received through 1984 pertaining to
about 400 sites.
      Because of high population dens:.ties and pressure for land in urban
areas, many properties have been used
ameliorative measures  (e.g., a former
more than once without any significant
gas works site later used by a sugar
refinery) .  Such multiple uses usually complicate site assessments and
planning for necessary remedial measui es .
                                      31

-------
      A DDE/Welsh Office Circular "Development of Contaminated Land," issued
in August 1987 deals with the planning aspect of contaminated sites where
reuse is proposed.  It is noted that almost half of all new development in
1986 was on previously used land.  The Circular states, "The Central
Government wishes to encourage full and effective use of land in urban areas
and the reuse of sites which have previously been developed" (DOE/WO, 1987, p.
1).  It is intended that local planning authorities and developers will
implement the advice and guidance given in the Circular.
      In recent years, more and more contaminated sites are being identified.
This is not because more sites are being suddenly contaminated; the chemicals
that are only recently recognized to be of concern because of potential health
effects have been present on many of these sites for decades.  What has
occurred recently is an increase in public awareness (and sometimes
exaggerated or unfounded fears) of the potential hazards of certain materials,
and the capability of analytical techniques to detect  specific chemicals has
become increasingly sophisticated.  An expression  (somewhat cynical, though
not totally unfounded) has been coined to describe the apparent result of  this
technological advance—"Pollution by Chemical Analysis."

PROGRAMS TO ADDRESS CONTAMINATED LAND REDEVELOPMENT

Functions of  the  ICRCL

      As the  Central  Government  became  involved  in providing advice  concerning
potential hazards arising  from contaminated  site development,  the  need for'an
interdepartmental committee  was  recognized.   The Interdepartmental Committee
on  the Redevelopment  of  Contaminated Land  (ICRCL) was  set up  in  1976 as  a
mechanism  for coordinating advice  being  given by different  government
departments.   The main  concerns  of the  ICRCL are human health  and  safety and
wider ranging environmental  effects  including effects  of  land  contamination on
building materials.   The ICRCL (1983a,  p.  2)  recognizes a basic  objective to
be  "to restore contaminated  land to beneficial use  economically."   The ICRCL
supports and encourages active redevelopment.  The  ICRCL's  significant program
elements (ICRCL,  1979,  p.  1) include the following:
       .     to develop and  coordinate advice  and  guidance on human_health
            hazards  arising in connection with the  reuse of  contaminated land;
       •     to develop and  coordinate advice  regarding  possible remedial
            measures;
       •     to make  such advice available to  local  authorities;
                                       32

-------
            to advise the DOE as to thje appropriateness of the methods selected
            by local authorities; and
       •    to identify research needs.
       The ICRCL .has helped to bring the issues surrounding reclamation and
 redevelopment into open debate.  ICRCL members, especially the Acting
 Secretary (Mr. Michael A. Smith from 1977 to 1980 and; since 1980, Mr. Martin
 J. Beckett of the CDEP),  acting individually or on behalf of the ICRCL, have
 published frequently in the open literature and presented papers and seminars
 on significant land reclamation issues and on the work of the Committee.  '
       In order to bring together the
 assessment of contaminated land,  the
 Industry to organize a conference,  "R
 which was held in Eastbourne in Octob
 forum to review the current state of
 conferences have been held subsequent
    various specialists involved with the
    ICRCL asked the Society of the Chemical
    sclamation of Contaminated Land," (1979)
       1979.   This conference provided a
    knowledge on reclamation.  Sequel
    ly and have served an important function
 in information dissemination ("Reclamation and Development of Contaminated
 Land,"  1980;  "The Hazards of Contaminkted Land,"  1981).

 ICRCL Guidelines  for Assessment of Contaminated Land
       The  ICRCL maintains  that  assessment  of  contamination and its
consequences  should  be  a normal part  |f  the sequence  of  decisions  and actions
associated with the  development of  land.   The ICRCL  (1983a)  noted  the
 important questions  to  be  answered  by
           What contaminants are present
           What hazards are associatec
           What is the intended use of
           Which hazards are likely tc
           What can be done to overcorre
      •    Would a different intended
           more effectively?
      For all types of sites, the avai
contamination are removal, isolation
(ICRCL, 1987, p. 15). The most appropriate
nature, degree, and extent of the
       and in what concentration?
     with those .contaminants?  •
     the site?
     affect that use?
      or minimize these hazards?
    use eliminate or diminish the hazards
    the assessment--
    lable options for dealing with soil
    y covering up, treatment, or mixing
         action to be adopted depends on the
contamination.
                                      33

-------
Tentative Trigger Concentrations—
      The U.K. has no statutory or official limits for contaminants present on
contaminated land nor any generally applicable rules for determining whether a
given site is suitable for a specific proposed use.  Each site must be
evaluated on the basis of its unique conditions and development
considerations.  One of the tasks carried out by the CDEP for the ICRCL is an
effort to develop -guidelines pertinent to contaminant levels at sites where
redevelopment is being considered.
      In 1983, the ICRCL formally issued guidance for Local Authorities and
other prospective developers on assessing and redeveloping land which may have
become chemically contaminated by its previous use  (ICRCL, 1983a).  This
guidance included "tentative trigger concentrations" intended for use by those
who interpret the findings of properly conducted site investigations prior to
development.  The trigger concentrations pertain to specific contaminants in
soils; they are the values below which a site could be regarded as uncontami-
nated  (i.e., it would present no additional risk to the critical  group due to
the presence of the subject contaminant).  The applicable trigger
concentrations vary with the proposed use of a site because the potential
hazards will be different for different end uses.
      The  1987  "Tentative Trigger Concentrations"  are given in Tables 1 and 2;
these values are the current guidelines recommended by the ICRCL.  Figure 3
illustrates the ICRCL's  interpretation of the threshold values and action
values.  The concentrations are  labeled as tentative because  it  is foreseen
that a need for modifications may arise  in the event that new information
becomes available.  The  guidance  stresses that the tentative  values  are  "only
applicable when used  in  accordance  with  the conditions and notes  specified  in
the Tables, most  especially only  after an adequate investigation  of  the  site"
 (ICRCL,  1987).  These  trigger  concentrations  do  not apply to  sites which have
already  been  developed,  and they are not  to be  interpreted as maximum
permissible concentrations.   Levels of contaminants exceeding the
concentrations  does  not  mean  that remedial action is  essential.
       The  ICRCL program to  develop  guidelines for principal contaminants was
 first  described at  the Eastbourne Conference  in  October  1979  (Smith,  1979).
 In light of  comments received on the initial  guidelines,  several revised
versions were prepared.   One  version of  tentative trigger concentrations for
 selected soil contaminants  associated with former gas  works and similar sites
 (Wilson  and Stevens,  1981)  was developed by  the  Environmental Safety Group of
 the AERE Harwell  Laboratory as part of research sponsored by  the DOE.  These
 tentative guidelines defined contaminant levels  described as  "acceptable,"
 "undesirable,"  or "unacceptable."  These classifications were subsequently

                                       34

-------












£ —
00
1-1

M
tt!
CJ




o
ttl
o
01



w
Si
CONTAMIN

a
H'
NORGAN
H
Q
SELECTS
~-
0
fa

k
g
EH
3
EH
J2
U
2
O
U

S
=
_:
TABLE I
ttl T3 O
.C H i jj
•H TJ • Q) *d
M 10 "d 0) .£5 ra
M tO t>i -H

3 nj to g &
"d > rl 01 O
0) 10 3 (0 -H 01
•H ,C jj jj £j
S-S 1 *8-
(0 O O JJ rH
O -H -H 10 rH -H
C S g, -5 3 *
O 10 g T3 £
•HO] 10 0) O
•00) O JJ g -ri
Co XJ 4_) y* qi [ i
2>-H ^, OHO
•H tn 73 O 10
JJ 0> C -
01 O -H 3 01 rH
0) JJ rH C 10
> a 01 o -H
58 & -as
C 73 IB 6
0) 01 ra 8 §
JJ - tn 73 jj ri
•H tn 73 !H cJ
tn oi 3 10 o! -
rH rH tjl O C
01 ft 01 01 C! O
to s oi M 8 "jj
3, m &> . 01 10
O [0 .Q 01 H
01 73 3 01 JJ
•d 0) o) >, oi «
to JJ w nj j± oi
•H g JJ o
t3 tn IH c
to O o 0) 0) o
01 a jj j> o
Ci 73 JJ 0) -H
u ra n c Jd jj
O tn o o jj . o
73 rH 01 ra 0) 01
| 8 5 SS 585
tO i — I ( — I 01 -H M
ft 3 g tn 01 ft 01
tn g jq 01 c .>
a S n o o >, o
U OJ •» O p[ -H CO rQ
"H ''O 4-1 xJ g rf
•*-* * (U W -CO
-H 4-) tU M -H M 4J
*O O OJ U 4J rj .
C aj-j -rj^ £0>fc>
o wo) gu o>gc;
"i§ S'u S ^"H
tu G -H § rS a
^ 04-1- OJX O^J-H
JJ o ra _r~j o i> jj
73 > jj jj 'd 01 c
JJ 0101-H >, rH73O
3 C-rfjJ o.£? 00
o -Htnto jja fl-d
•Q e:>iy m c IM -
JJ M rH C M J^. ra 10 rH
-H ratora ioti JH^H
S JJ Cj JJ . iH -rl J^>OJJ
0) O SH -H 01 ri 01
O OlJJtO 0101 JU01-H
3 c > jj o
•d ONoioio c c
o -HrHra njq Soo
in jjft3 toia SU-H
ft 10 ftrH rH JJ
ra Mioto i > tn jq M ci
•H "CO! OJJ JHOlffl.
•o oo§ So, "Sp^
jH OT3ft ^ OltOOOl
> o5Ta "H to rHga.^
C MHJ3 M HJ10J3O
•H EH rH 01 ft > JJ JJ
0) rH 33 rj jj
tn !H < rHO rao^C
•H 10 • 10 rl rH O -H 0
jj > O ft g
rn rag-d rid loirn'o'
jq 3g01 01-H OlOlrHrH
ttJ rHp^O, & rdlOO)
w JJ fOOO OOl iHJJ-H>
rj > rH i— 1 rH ra rH Ora
o 2 _, S S 3 togoi-a
•^ 3 rnoira 5"ra in8oili4H
-H E-i  M'IHOIO
o • • . .
CJ tH CNJ . rn "31








"1 c
W rH 0
<-* ,_j 'i~i
0°^
•H w y
[ 1 ^
td Tf
w a)
JJ -H
C M
a> "b
o

O -H
u ni -a
rH
rj D O
0) ^! J3
tn ^ M
tn tn tl)

M ' JZl
EH EH












M _
0)

1
10
rH













ra
c
td
a
j
3
J










** ** * ** ** ** * +






oo n in 'in oo o o rH o 01 w
rH^J1 rH(N OOOO 'O5
vo o . m o
•H CM








(

' • s g s • g s s g
w a a a ' a a a
ji ii Si fi |iil II
^** O- Ov O- O-* O- O-
f~~j ^Q •" • M i I CQ i — | C/3 r^ [Q , — | [jj f_^ yj
' ' 'O i — I O i — 1 rO i — 1 [O i — I *O i 	 1 T3 1 Tl
rTj ^ r~Tj ^ f"*' HJ r~H cC r~H frt f~H n3 i~H

gS gti gti wS g'ti' .gti g*H
|| nil f| |i ii i?
fr] Died DinS t5inJ D)rd D)(o OJ(U Diro
rn o-ft oa o"a u-a o^ u^ u^
tti * "r~* "^ *rH «rH »rH -tH
* SJ2 S/2 's/3 S/3 S/3 8/3' 8/3
^ ^nJ ^^ £J-) ^M S^-i SM SM
4J Oro Oro OdJ Ortf OnJ Ocd OdJ
D)

M
rcf • >.
N
cd

0)
01
O
P . "

rd
"
_cJ
_•§
j^ ^-,
w ""*
4-1
"^ *"~^
" 4-)
!S c
C 0)
^ I — 1 ' '
K rd ^— s
1 § ^ - -
o So.
,C JJ

*• eg g
i ! 1 1 1 if i
"S
3
C
•H
JJ
C
o
















































35

-------
1
I






























G
ontinue
CJ

rH
TABLE :

































I
1








C
O
a5ti
O O rf
H ra "•
jj
id 13
M 0)
JJ -H
C W
fl) 'O
o
0 -H 2
<•> * 0
III
M ~ £
"












U
0)
U
P
Planned

















u
jj
c

c

"rj
JJ
c
o
*-*




































£j
rH
(tf
0
43
O
JJ
hazards

^
H
re
c
c
J-
c
4-
£!
,£

C.
•r

J.
O
J-

43
c

n
-1
**
w
jj
C
(T
C


1
4
C

pt




1









•


* * * *






m o o o
n r- o
rH en









0 0) 0 0)
O O O O
jj jj JJ JJ
0) 0 Q) 0)
nj (d nJ rd
w tfl u W
jj jj JJ JJ
e c c c
(d (d (d ro
rH rH rH rH
04 Pi ft ft
a) 0 0 o)
M S M M
0000
43 —. 43— 43 — 43 --
& \o £ vo S vr> 3 >JD
wcs wcs tars WCN
(j) — . a)~^ 0—- 0^-
tn tn w ta
<; Dl i<; Di «* 01 «*














^,
^^
Q)
rH

3
d

rft
Q) IT) U")
•jJ * ^ ^
5 »— - •— ' *.
s^ . ^<

c; CD (U
o a ^ o
M a u c
o o •« •*~|
pq U S N
0) "X
X! O
i> jJ Q)
(DO W
*O ^ OJ Q)
C 13 >, ^!

o a
W -U JJ
jj 01 (g
.O (D rH
• I Q) rH -H *O
£ m ,Q o 0)
S iw nj m JJ
rft Q) U O
m -H (l) <1»
Jj O ^H £j *W
aX §IrH rt
W O flJ Jo
® fl) rH nH
^  rH 'O
M I-H f-i (0 nJ
r-H nJ M
d) 05 m JJ ^
r" 'I l 01 3 AJ
j 0) C H
« •£ * &

.*j m Gi w
H rH 43
_ W -H JJ
°. (DOS
• 3 01 O
01 rH M
*§, rH > ,-0 m
n > H 18 JJ
3 01 01 -H
•"8^ I10* 1
CO j_j JJ M -H (0
™ 2 jj (0 01
m -f-i 
JJ O & (00) (8
JJ (8 43 S 01
'X w JJ 01 C
S rH O O 43 (0
0) (8 C ^* N JJ
r; S -HO (0 • W
JJ S Ul H "O 01 JJ
. . . 0) U C H C O
eoyp-OrHBGnJDOO!
-H 01 43 -^ O -H , jj 01 3 nrH 0 JJ J M
iGg01g

0)(843 O -01CJJ

01JJO43JJrHO)OOJJ
X JJ d) 43 ft D >i
0)8 rHgOJft'HOl.g
S "OrH JJO'HOlft
Bffl-HWOOOIOI
rH-nl QH'HOJJJJ
•g • § S jj a t< ° x jj jj
M(OC'dOJWO(tfC
1/1^3 d)M' — '4JJJ ro
o •rH4J'-iw
-H4J '"'^Sttl^x'w
(0 r> ^ ^1 JJ ""H *• P QJ

UXX-iJ (UOQJOJO
CjQJd *OUJJW>-i 1 W -H
G^Hoa>e -^^uw
•H3 nJCJrtJ HQ)W
UrHO)4JJJJJ
-------












Q
IV1

3
o
o
w c
si

to ^

1 u
jj 0£

A |_J
^,

01 M
•O O
ra > .
N -a m
c ID ra a) xi
on) xl xi -d jj
jj o) jj a)
x) a> o M
M o js a o
O >i JJ jj
•H "O -'H
JJ rH Q) M Id 3
o aj t2 a?
4)  ra ra o -H
CM  M
)rf II a. "d o w jj
OJ S
si
1|*
gs
EGGER CONCENTR
CARBONIZATION
-^
^ id
* o
•"* (V

EH w
S o

s
s
. M
/N3 &


w

CQ

EH












•Da) NS >. m c
ra jj Q) ra xl m
-H xl m g jj o
c ra E-" ro c
• ra o o a) a) o
01 ft JJ !> O
ffl a & • -H -H 5
G T3 -H JJ (D -H
JJ (DM JJ C XI JJ
o wo ,raoj jj.u
o ra *o g 'o ra
*M ,Q •. ft ft rf qj
•d 3 o o> a)  M
Ic ra D> o tn o
O 01 .  d) M JJ
u •[> &m oft-H
51 C MO) O rH C
XI O IH C O 0) -H
JJ O rH -H > JJ
•O rH M "d Q) CJ
jj mm -H-H tHT3o
3 C-H SM 00
2 '2 S? < x! "d
XJ g >i "d ra c »H
JJ MrH era (UnjrH
•H < g » co
O -rt rH -H & O O
M JJft rHJJ OO-H
ft A ft d) M rH JJ
o) Mra MO d
•d o o xl coo)
•H OT3 rajj mrabte
rH Q) Q) C O C
JM >i 3 >4H 3 -H ra
om rHO rHgaix!
"" fi ra raSxio
„, E-i > C > JJ JJ
Q) O C JJ
ra M 4i-H aio<4-id
•H ra- rajj rHo-HO)
JJ 0) -H ft g
u rac- xl-d gai>,a
rH oioi-d jjoi rararna
•O 3gO) raOlrHrH
M JJ goo OC rHjJ-H>
•°!c So1'> CM Oft

^_j E"1 rfj T3 *O S O H *W Q) O
•d
o •
kj rH CN fO ^»











|
jj






o
-H

Q



-r


jj
c
8
u
0) *0
rH
a o
CJ JW ii-i
S fa S
°fe S

2ri •!—)

"^
*N^

tj
£




to
0)
U
Proposed



















i

!



















































O O O O O O
O O ' O O O O
m o  M MM JJ
c o> jj a c
 -H g
4J T3 g -0 4J
O rH JJ rH O
rH -H 0-H rH M
•H P rH 3 rH Q)
Id fl rH jq Id >
id o
ra w M w oi
C id c id c id W
0) (U ID Q) Q) Q) JH
"P ^ T3 M "0 M id
iJ id M id M id x!
id -id -id
DIM 'OS-I (3) TDM DlT!
us a> a>  o a> Og, g,
, -H H id o -H id O -H 'id d
JJlti OO JJ OO JJO -H
w-ta M oj coratf
H)>i o • aj "OiO (U^J r-H
Sid c l~> g 5k go -H
OrH idid o idid Old 3
QQ Jx; Q JX3 QI-H m














^




—
tN
rH

O OJ d)
•H g . -0
4-1 O -H
s-a §
o us w >.
iH 0 rH 61
id O o
>i M C 0)
rH >0 01 0)
O >i XI M
o< x! a, pt,

•— *.
•g
3

1j
o

























































37

-------





























•O
(I)
2
e
•H
1
CJ
CN
ta
1






































I
! ""*
i «~*
t •H
Ss
§•8
J T*
J }-
4 
0)
ID
K
o

H-l


C
• 01
0) -H
01 M
3 <

01 01
4J (H
O >-<
•d
U 01
pose a particular haza
analytical reasons. Se
OJ
0 M
a o

01
0) -
o n
ro nj
jj

C rH
rfl nj
C O
•H O
ro M
4J O
U M-l
O
O M
01
0> M
43 tl
4J OJ
01
rd is

01 ro
01
01
4-1 U
•H 01
g jG
iH 13
CD
O 01
a D

8 -
OJ .. ^~
0 J rH
13 K ""^





U)
o
£
u
i
rH
10
O
-H
4J
rH
(0
C
ro

rH
•H
ro
4-1
01
•O
M
O

M
> 01
01 4J
01 ro
-H •§
w C
8 |
•H
g -O
ment of Gasworks and Si:
Iphate-bearing soils an
a 3
O 01
rH
0) C

01
'd QJ
01' 4->
OH 0)
M
01 O
43 C
4J O
U
o
M ••

Ul
tjl Ol
(3
•H 4J
01 01
•H 01
rH 
-------
  03
  0
  O
 •H
 c
 s
 c
 o
 O
 0)
 en
 Dl
 M-l
 0
 o
•H
•U
 0)
4J
 a
H
n

 0)
•H
fa
         CO
         O
         (1)
         U
         M
         3
         0
         CO

-------
replaced with a single "trigger concentration" in the 1983 ICRCL guidelines
and further modified in 1987.  [Note:  A Second Edition of the report,
"Problems Arising From the Redevelopment of Gas Works and Similar Sites,"
prepared for the DOE by Environmental Resources Limited, was published in
April 1987.]
      The current guidelines focus mainly on potential hazards which might
arise due to direct ingestion of soil or consumption of contaminated
vegetables.  Other considerations include skin exposure, phytotoxicity,
chemical attack on building materials and services,, and hazards due to fire
and explosion.  The tentative values are, in  some cases, adapted  from existing
guidelines  (developed  for  other purposes);  some are based on professional
judgment after taking  into account  the  information available.
      The particular type  of hazard which will dictate  the most stringent
applicable  guidelines  will depend on the  type of  land,  the planned land  use,
and the nature of  the  contamination.  The most acute  situation  for uptake  of
contaminants  by  food crops is presented by  allotments or  large  gardens where
food  crops  are grown.   For domestic gardens other hazards  such  as direct
contact and ingestion  of contaminated  soil  by children  may be dominant.   For
certain contaminants  the level  at which phytotoxic effects are  evident may
determine  the most stringent guideline.

Notes on  Redevelopment of Potentially  Contaminated Sites--
       The ICRCL has developed a series of formal notes  addressing
 redevelopment at landfill sites (ICRCL, 1983e) ,  sewage  works and farms  (ICRCL,
 1983d), gas works sites (ICRCL,  1983c), and scrap yards and similar sites
 (ICRCL, 1983b).   The notes were prepared to assist those considering
 redevelopment of these types of sites  in ensuring that contamination is
 properly evaluated and allowed for in  the redevelopment design schemes.
 notes described the origin and nature  of contamination, the types of
 contamination likely to be encountered, the potential hazards posed by
 different contaminants, site assessment strategy, and applicable remedial
 measures.  For most sites, the types of hazards which may need to be
 considered include the  following:
        1.   presence of  toxic materials,
            potential  combustibility of waste materials,
            effects on building materials,
            emissions  of toxic  or  flammable gases,  and
                                                                  The
2.
3.
4.
5,
             general problems of site drainage and stability (ICRCL,  1983b,  -c,
             and -e).
                                        40

-------
        Landfill  Sites—The  earliest  version  of  the  notes  on  landfill  sites was
 drafted in 1978.  Several updates have been developed since the original notes
 were issued to present the information thoroughly and concisely and to achieve
 consistency in the presentation format for all the notes in the ICRCL series.
 Emissions of toxic.and/or flammable gases are of special concern at landfill
 sites being considered for redevelopment.  Domestic waste contains organic
 matter which decays producing "landfill gas."  Methane,  carbon dioxide, and ..
 hydrogen sulfide are the most common constituents of landfill gas.  Its
 properties depend mainly on the concentration of methane and on the ratio of
 the carbon dioxide and methane.  Methane in'the range of 5 to 15 percent by
 volume with air forms explosive mixtures (lower explosive limit).   The
 flammability decreases,  however,  as the percentage of carbon dioxide
 increases.   A mixture containing 25 p
 nonflammable.   Mixtures with a carbon
 3.5 are not flammable if mixed with a
 This ratio  varies greatly in landfill
 "Sites known or suspected to be produ
 all forms of "hard"  development (i.e.
 activity are envisaged) . until emissio
                                      srcent  carbon  dioxide  by volume  is
                                      dioxide  to methane  ratio  of  greater  than
                                      Lr  in any proportion (ICRCL,  1983e).
                                      gas.   The ICRCL  (1983e) recommends that,
                                      :ing landfill  gas are  best avoided  for
                                       where building and construction
                                       of gas  has ceased, or until  it has
 decreased to negligible proportions."   Another important'consideration is
 settlement which commonly occurs  as  landfill  wastes  density over time.
       Sewage Works and Farms--Land that was previously used for treatment of
 sewage  or application  of liquid,  semi -liquid  or dried  sewage sludge  frequently
                                      Metals  present  in  sewage  are
becomes available for redevelopment.
concentrated during treatment and usually pose the main concern at sewage
works and farms (ICRCL, 1983d).
       Gas Works Sites—Contamination
processes at the sites of  former  town
                                      Erom  the  gas production  and  purification
                                      gas plants, coke works and tar works in
England has been examined  in detail because of the  large number of.such sites.
Accidental spills and  leakage of process  liquids, onsite land disposal of  tars
and liquors, and deposits  of solid wastes  (e.g., clinker and spent oxide)  are
all found on these types of sites.  Residues such as tars and sludges
remaining in tanks and pipes at disused plants after decommissioning often
complicate site cleanups. Coal tar is
                                      a complex mixture of organics including
benzene, toluene, xylenes, 'ethyl benzene, styrene, phenol, cresols, xylenols,
tar acids, naphtha, naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, and other
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (ICRCL, 1983c).
       Spent  oxide  is usually  found  in
                                      appreciable quantities on former gas
works sites.  It was often used as fill for road building and plant expansion.
This material results from the use of iron oxide .(also called bog iron or iron
                                      41

-------
                                  "Blue
sponge) in purification of the raw gas produced from coal.  The gas was passed
through beds of iron oxide to adsorb sulfur species, cyanide and other
contaminants in the gas.  The material was termed "spent oxide" when the
sulfur content reached 50-60 percent, and it was then discarded as waste or
used in the production of other chemicals such as sulfuric acid (ICRCL,
1983c).  Spent oxide has a distinctive deep blue color  (sometimes called
Billy') which results from the presence of ferric ferrocyanide (Prussian
Blue) .
       Scrap Yards and Similar Sites—The  ICRCL Notes (1983b)  list the
following operations at scrap yards as possibly contributing to contamination:
       •     Dismantling  of motor vehicles, or  aircraft.
       •     Storage and  dismantling  of plant machinery.
       •     Metal  cleaning,  sorting  and  recovery particularly  for  recovery of
            nonferrous metals.
       •     Recovery of  electrical components  from equipment and appliances.
       •     Burning of  cables to  recover copper and of  vehicle batteries to
            recover lead,  and of  inflammable materials  to reduce bulk.
       •     Crushing and fragmenting of  bulky  ferrous scrap to provide feed
            for blast furnaces.
       •     Burning of rubber tires.
Contamination may result  from leakage or  spillage of fluids  (e.g.,  oil,  acid,
paint, grease, transformer  or capacitor fluids) or from dumping of residues.

Assessing Hazards of Fire and Explosion

       Many of the inquiries received by the CDEP pertain to sites where
methane  or  other  combustible or  explosive materials are present.   Many sites
containing  combustible  materials (e.g.,  colliery  waste) are  not normally
classified  as  contaminated,  even though the  site  may be derelict  and an eye-
sore. Opposition to building on refuse piles (which often contain combustible
materials)  is  typically much less than  the  opposition to building on farmland.
       The assessment of fire and explosion hazards  of  contaminated  land  is an
 important program aspect of both DOE and ICRCL.  Dr. Dennis Simms and Mr.
Martin Beckett of the CDEP  (Personal communication, March 1985)  stressed the
dangers  of  methane noting that the occurrence of  methane is not unusual and
that lives  have been lost as a result of methane explosions (An example is the
accident at Abbeystead, Lancashire).  Methane, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen
42

-------
  sulfide are produced  in domestic  waste  disposal  sites as a result of
  biological degradation .and may migratl  both vertically and horizontally for
  considerable distances from their poikt of  origin.   ingress of methane into
  buildings can result  in significant accumulations  in a confined space (e g   a
  basement)  posirig a potential explosioA  hazard.

  Notes on the Fire Hazards, of. Contaminated Land—

        The ICRCL has developed  "Notes  In the Fire Hazards of Contaminated
  Land" (ICRCL,  1984)  addressing the combustible nature  of certain materials  in
  the ground,  the problems posed and the possible remedial measures that might
  be employed.   Combustible materials encountered in sites being  considered for
  development  include  coal and coke particles, oil, tar, pitch/rubber, plastic
  and domestic waste.   Underground fired can release toxic gases  (e g
  hydrogen sulfide,  sulfur oxides,  carbon monoxide),  and as combustible'material
  T C!  *~«/-\»-k «f»l 1W1.-1 *J  _*..„!_	f_T
  is  consumed,  subsidence may occur,  or
there may be hidden cavities.
 Underground  fires  pose  a serious threat for development as buildings erected
 over such sites may  be  undermined.
        Where combustible materials are
                                        present below ground, a fire may start
                                             ,       -- j	—«—»/•-». i.o.0.^ iiici^y s> OctJ. U
 andpropagate, smouldering  for  long  periods of  time.   An  underground fire can
 be ignited by a building  fire or bonfiU  or by  contact  with the  heat generated
 by buried power cables.   (An underground  fire in  Edinburgh,  Scotland involving '
 coal waste is believed to have  been  cafsed  by an  overheated electrical cable  )
 Certain buried materials are capable oj: self-heating due  to slow oxidation
 Temperatures in such materials as coal
                                        wastes, some biologically  active
                                             	f	*«*-• *•* -i.*-* j.\_/y _u\_a.j_ j_^y  d.t_.!_ J. v e
 landfill materials, and spent iron oxide from gas works can rise  to ignition
 temperatures,  initiating slow smouldering fires and propagation.
       The most widely used criterion  tj, decide if a material-should be
 classified as  combustible is the calorific value (heat of combustion).  Other
 measurable quantities that r.elate to combustibility are the percentages of
 moisture,  volatiles,  and ash.   At the Jresent time there is no accepted method
 to  assess  whether a buried waste is corrbustible or under what circumstances  it
 might  smoulder.   The ICRCL notes that it  is  "inadvisable to use the calorific
 value  alone as the sole  measure of the
 P-  3).  Materials with calorific value
 Btu/lb) are almost certainly capable  of
with calorific value  below 2 megajoules
not smoulder.
       The  following excerpts  concerning1 remedial  measures and site
development are from  the ICRCL Notes  (ICRCL,  1984, p. 3).
                                      43
combustibility of a site"  (ICRCL, 1984,
above 10 megajoules/kilogram  (4,300
 sustaining smouldering.  Materials
'kilogram (860 Btu/lb)  probably will

-------
      "The  only  certain way  to  eliminate  the  fire risk  from a  site  is  to


      problem is usually  not solved,  merely moved.
               soono                ^cover S
             non-combustible layer that insulates underlying
      material from the effects of a severe surface fire.   Calculations
      carried" out £y the Fire Research Station indicate that an appropriate
      depth for such a layer would be 1 meter . "
                        t.o
      site which is or has been on fire must be assessed before vehicles or
      machinery are brought on site."
                      en
      Those working on such a site must be made aware of the dangers of,
      Samp^? lighting bonfires on -posed materials^  This applies not only
      £ ^f w^fwnicrmS S-cSf S out^n             "ShSl responsible
      must be aware that  there may.be continuing problems for the whole life
      of the site use."
Research —
      Research projects  related to  fire  and explosion  hazards  on  contaminated
sites are being funded by DOE through the CDEP and conducted by the .Fire
Research Station at Borehamwood, Hertfordshire.  The Fire Research Station
located some
             15 miles (24 kilometers) north of London, is
                                                          a facility of the
Building Research Establishment.  The Fire Research Station employs a staff of
about 150 graduates in a variety of disciplines ranging from chemistry to
architecture and undertakes research into all aspects of fire.  The research
                   re Research Station for the CDEP may provide the basis, for
                   determine combustible wastes and an effective approach for
dealing with sites with buried combustible materials.
       Research on the combustibility of  soils and ignition behavior is being
                    better understanding of how to determine what materials
                   Although calorific values  are  often used to assess
                   is known that other factors also affect the. ability of; a
material  to  ignite and  smoulder.   In a series, of  experiments, mixtures of
sawdust and  silica powder were  prepared  to  simulate wastes.   Samples of the
mixtures,  formed into 50-millimeter cubes,  were suspended  in  an oven and
heated at different  temperatures.   Variables  in the experiments
conducted  at  the  Fire
a  standard test to
 conducted to gain a
 pose
        fire risk.
 combustibility,  it
                                                                 were
                                       44

-------
  temperature,  size  of  sample  and percent  of  combustible material.   These
  experiments showed ignition  when mixtures containing 5 percent combustible
  were heated; mixtures  containing 2 percent  did  not  ignite.   The experiments
  also showed that certain materials exfibit  "jump" behavior,  that  is,  the
  material heats in  relation to the ovej temperature  until  a  specific
  temperature is reached and the materiil  ignites.  For  one material  this

  l^o"1011^^6"^6 " 235°C; f°r ^f hSr materla1' the  i^ition occurs at
  insulaf  T StUdiSS arS hlghlY  relTnt ^ Si^ifi-nt i* designing  thermal
  msulat.ng barriers beneath buildings on sites containing combustible
  materials.   in light of these experiments,  it is the opinion of the researcher
  that calorific value is insufficient (and can be misleading) to decide  if a
  TH^ t" OT~ T J* 1 V»i-\
-------
sites that contain buried coal waste or.spent iron sponge.  In past years
large quantities of iron sponge (iron oxide mixed with wood dust) were used
for cleaning sulfur gases and cyanide from coal gas, and the spent iron sponge
was usually disposed of by burial on site as a waste.  Elemental sulfur is
present in such materials and is reported to be a smouldering retardant even
though it is combustible in air (Personal communication:  Dr. David Crowhurst,
March, 1985) .                                                       J4=-nn
       In other research,  mixtures of gases  designed to simulate landfill
gases are being used to test  the detection  capabilities of  commercially
available instruments.  The objective  is  to detect  the lower  explosive limit
of  gas mixtures that might be present  at  a  given,location (e.g.  in a  basement
of  a house or  other building  where  methane  from underground sources may
accumulate).   The buoyancy of a landfill  gas is dependent on the gas
composition.   Most landfill  gas mixtures  have a density similar to that  of
air  so  that accumulation of  gas  in a building is determined by the rate of
entry,  the  natural air movement,  and the  ventilation conditions (Crowhurst and
Beever,  1987) .
       It is known that methane, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen,
 and carbon monoxide are formed during the degradation of domestic wastes
 (methane and carbon dioxide are the main components).  After 2 to 3 years, the
 hydrogen production is minimal, although methane and carbon dioxide production
 continue much longer.  The presence of carbon dioxide may affect the
 capabilities of some instruments to detect methane, thereby giving erroneous
 results that could mean failure to detect  an explosive atmosphere.
       In a  related project,  the  explosivity of various gas mixtures  is  being
 determined.  Preliminary results suggest that  carbon  monoxide
 dampen the explosivity of gas
 Crowhurst, March,  1985).
mixtures (Personal communication:  Dr. David
  Other DOE Research Related to Contaminated Land,

        In addition to the  fire related research programs, the DOE has
  sponsored research on a variety of issues relating to contaminated land.  This
  research work is conducted by the Building Research Establishment,  by
  universities, and by various private or government-affiliated laboratories
  such as the AERE Harwell Laboratory (Harwell) in Oxfordshire.  Research work
  performed for the DOE is described in publications available through the CDEP.
        The earliest  CDEP research projects spanned a  5-year period,  typically
  involving 5 to 6 people.  One early CDEP-sponsored investigation addressed the
  depth of cover that is  necessary  to contain buried contamination.  Originally,
                                        46

-------
                                 migration
                               particularly
there was  concern that upward
that this  may  be  a problem,
concluded  that in the  U.K.  one meter
rooting depth  of  crops.
      The  DOE  has sponsored research
to evaluate grouting and other ground
at contaminated sites  (Smith  and
                                         might  occur.   The research indicated
                                           in  tropical  climates.   It was
                                       of soil cover  is appropriate based on the
                                        by Atkins Research and Development  Ltd.
                                         injection techniques for applicability
                                             1983).
                                  Charles

Research by the Building Research Establishment (BRE)--
       Research work directly related L engineering and  building at
contaminated sites  is  carried out by {he Inorganic Materials and Geotechnics
Divisions of the Building Research Stltion of the BRE.  Conditions that may
hinder or complicate building at  a particular site include the presence of old
foundations,  pipes, tanks,  and other.structures;  waste deposits consisting of
metal slag,  sludges, tars,  or refuse material;  and combustible materials and
cavities caused  by  in-ground  fires.
      Many  sites have  poor engineering properties and require special
 consolidation  techniques.   The BRE has
                                     	 —•-•-•"-—x* ^-^.^ j.xe=j.vj etna j-aooracory
 investigations  to  assess the effectiveness of ground improvement methods.
 T^nocso  n*^^HTii«^*~ii +- «*«».	._      -•_.
 These include  temporary pre-loading (a
 technique); compacting  by  repeatedly d
 height  (e.g.,  20 meters) to  the  fill s
                                               ,	.. „ v, .i. V^.L. ^iid j. AWW t-ifc;pL.n.s J ;
 and^compression of a  filled  site  with  soft  cohesive soil (Smith and Charles,

       The  BRE  has  carried out a program of long-term monitoring of
                                       carried out field and laboratory
                                       widely applicable and effective
                                      ropping a heavy weight from a great
                                      arface (effective for shallow depths);
 settlements using magnet extensometers
 monitored at sites covered with old dome
                                        f	o-v-j. «<=>.= ,  ^<_>xj.j.t;j:y wasce,  and
 pulverized fuel ash as well as opencasj mining sites  and  backfilled docks
       The durability of building  materkals is another area addressed in the
       ffi O ^ T" f Vi   T>l-i A f, » ,	l_ i	  e-      _
                                       installed  in  boreholes.   Settlement is
                                            refuse,  colliery waste,  and
 BRE research.   This work has focused me
 BRE guidance has been issued on the us<=
                                         	" — --*-v.s-a.ij..3M.j. O-CtUti— JJ*3O.i II
 Laboratory tests have examined the resistance of cement-based ground
 contaminated by phenolic compounds,  low PH, high sulfide and sulfate
 concentrations,  and various organic species (Smith and Charles, 1983).

 Research by  AERE Harwell--

       Much of the actual site assessment and engineering work in  the  areas of
 contaminated land and hazardous  waste  hks  been  performed by'private or govern-
ment affiliated  laboratories  such  as Harwell.   Harwell functions as the main
government resource  for  research,  method development,  and applied technology
                                      inly on sulfate attack on  concrete.
                                       of concrete in sulfate-bearing  soils.

-------
related to hazardous waste.  Harwell's Hazardous Materials Service Unit of the
Environmental Safety and Chemical Analysis Group has conducted investigat10ns
on more than 40 U.K. sites.  They have developed plans for remedial measures
and cleanup and have supervised actual cleanup programs at many sites.  Much
of the remedial action work has been performed for private clients and is
therefore not documented in the published literature.
       in projects conducted for the DOE,  Harwell investigated the problems,
arising  from the  redevelopment of gas works and  similar sites.  One aspect of
this work focused on  "spent oxide"  residues from gas purification processes.
Laboratory  studies were carried out to assess  the acceptability of        :  _
identifiable spent oxide or soil  contaminated  with  spent  oxide for disposal  in
a landfill  site.   It  was determined that  controlled landfill  is an acceptable
disposal route  for these wastes.   Harwell recommended  co-disposal of  thin
layers (less  than 50  centimeters)' of oxide between  layers (more than  2 meters)
of domestic refuse with the oxide layers  at least  3 meters (9.8  feet)  below
the finished surface (Wilson  and Hudson,  1979.)
       Tentative  guidelines were developed by Harwell  for contaminants
associated with gas works sites.   The tentative guidelines proposed by Harwell
are listed in Table 3.
       Acceptable levels of the various contaminating  species  characteristic
 of gasification  sites are discussed in the Harwell Project Report (Wilson and
 Stevens  1981) .  The specific recommendations address the levels of various
 pollutants that  may require action depending on land use.  The main points of
 the discussion are highlighted below.
       Coal Tars-The main risk is  that of  cancer  from contact with  certain
 polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons  contained in  the tar.  A no-effect  level of
  100 mg/kg  is suggested based on  skin contact  in children.  To protect against
  skin  contact, protective  clothing  is recommended for  workers  who may  encounter
  levels  above 10,000  mg/kg.  Based  on preliminary phytotoxicity experiments, a
  threshold  level  of about  1,000 mg/kg  is  suggested.  Threshold levels  of  about
  10,000  and 20,000 mg/kg are suggested based on  aesthetic appearance  and  odor.
  Preliminary guidance based on  acceptable levels is given below:
        1    For any site,  visually observable  contamination (about 10,000
             mg/kg) with coal  tar or oily materials is  unacceptable,  and
             requires remedial action for any proposed end use.
        2.   Similarly, for all sites,  coal tar  levels greater than 5,000 mg/kg
             are
                 undesirable
             For any site where plants
             tar levels greater
             greater-than 5,000
than
mg/kg
(including
    mg/kg
                  grass)  are to be grown,  coal
                  -3    '_            11	T 	
                 are
                                      are unacceptable.
                     undesirable and levels
                                        48

-------
            TABLE  3.   TENTATIVE GUIDELINES  PROPOSED BY AERE HARWELL
                             FOR SOIL CONTAMINANTS*
Level
Contaminant
Coal tar
Phenols
Free cyanide
Complex cyanides
Thiocyanate
Sulphur
Sulphide
Sulphate

Acidity
'
Planned Use
housing, amenity
public open space"
nature reserve
industrial (no lan<
mains, water pipes
all other uses
housing, amenity oj
industrial (no lane
any use where plant
to be grown
all uses
all uses
all uses
residential, commer
industrial developm
with no landscaping
all uses, including
open space, landscaj
housing, amenity,
open space
================
Undesirable
(mg/kg)
200
500
1,000
Iscaping) 5,000
5
100
>en space 50
Iscaping) 500
s are
50
50
1,000
250
:ial, or
snts
1,000
gardens ,
>ed areas 200
pH < 5
"'•
unacceptable
level
(mg/kg)
1,000
2,000
5,000
10,.000 '
1,000
500
1,000
1,000
500
10,000
1,000
50,000
2,000
pH < 3
====^==^T-
* Adapted'from Wilson and Stevens, 1981.
                                    49

-------
      '•
           than 1,000 mg/kg are unacceptable.
      Phenols-The most  significant hazard depends on the end use proposed.
The suggested threshold level is 5,000 mg/kg based on ingestion or skin
contact by children and based on skin contact by adults.  The preliminary
guidelines are given below:
           Levels above  1,000 mg/kg may be unacceptable with respect  to plant
           toxicity  and  odor nuisance.
      Cvanides-The  significant  hazards posed by  free  cyanide  include acute
poisoning through ingestion of soil by children, acute poisoning by i^^x
of hydrogen cyanide, and acute poisoning by ingestion of contaminated water.
A threshold level in soil of about 1,000 mg/kg  is recommended to protect
children.  Proposed guidelines are as follows:
       .    For use  of  land  for  the purposes of
                          SIS  f iSS
                                                          undesirable .
            corresponding  levels  for  free cyanide  in surface or ground water
            samples are  5  mg/kg and 50 mg/kg.
             generaly as  undesirable and 1,000  mg/kg is  unacceptable.
        For complex ferro- and f erri-cyanides,  the acute toxicity is much lower
 than  for  free  cyanide.   The  principal  problems are  discoloration  of soil  and
 the characteristic odor  of spent oxide at  500  mg/kg of  complex cyanide.
 phytotoxicity  (threshold possibly as low as 50 mg/kg for complex  pyanide.) .
 and skin  irritation above 2,500 mg/kg.
        Thiocyanate  is associated mainly with water pollution.
        Total cyanide  levels  of  50 mg/kg in  soil and  5 mg/L in water are deemed
  "acceptable."                                                          f ..
        o.,if,,r.  «ru3  Its Anions-Elemental sulfur is of concern because of its
  combustibility with accompanying release of sulfur dioxide and because it
  contributes ultimately to the  formation of sulfate and sulfxde in .oils.
                                        50

-------
  and on?*'
  and on the
                     of the soil.
                                Wlth SUlfide «• dependent on its physical  for.
                                   InJlubl.  ferrous Sulfide may present hazards
  pungent odor of rotten eggs.  Its pr<
  corrosion of building materials,  and
  sulfide are the following:
                                      sence may also cause water pollution,
                                      phytotoxicity.  Tentative guidelines for
       Sulfate contributes to corrosio  problems in buildings at levels
 greater than 1,000 mg/kg in soil or 3«U  mg/L in ground water.   Toxicity to
 Plants,  particularly in acid soils occurs  at levels above 200 to 300 mg/kg
 2 percent in water is toxic.   A further  concern is that sulfate^be'
 converted to sulfide.  Suggested guidelines for sulfate in soil are as
 follows:

       *    onVconcret:e 1'°°°  "*'**  T  Undesi~ble' *«» viewpoint of attack
            Levels  about  200 mg/kg are
                         %Z 2£ SLTSiS^^-SSii?00 ^
       •     Levels about 5 percent are

The Greater London Council (GLC)

       The Greater London Council  (GLC)
                                       generally unacceptable.
                                        was  established  in  1965 as the
                                  ,	,  „„„..= <=.= t.cnjj.j.aiiea in iybi> as the
democratically elected local government of London  (see Authors' Note  below)
The maln responsibilities of the GLC wire the  fire  service, refuse
highways and traffic planning,  and strjcfcure plann±ng_  ^ ^     ^
control over plannxng for Inner London  and strategic planning control for out-
Greater London area provided an overall
their own detailed local plans for
responsible for flood prevention in
                                  the
^3'i?£^^8ff"s:'Js.psr^"5iSs-tr
and most of its responsibilities divMed among v
of the former GLC still reside within tSe SoSdon
    framework for the boroughs who'drew up
     individual areas.   The GLC .was, also
Greater London.
                                             §ortrays ?he roie
                                             ^n^" la^er' the GLC was abolished
                                       esiduay    °rOUg  Councils-  Some functions

-------
          GLC also promoted efforts to bring derelict, damaged, and vacant
land into beneficial use.  It is estimated that 3,365 hectares (8,345 acres)
or just over 2 percent of the total land area of Greater London is so damaged
that it is incapable of beneficial use without prior treatment; this estimate
includes 1,546 hectares  (3,834 acres) classified as "derelict- and likely to
be eligible for Derelict Land Grants to help with reclamation  (GLC, 1984d,
   115)   The GLC and certain London Borough Councils have acquired
substantial areas of vacant or derelict land as part of urban  renewal schemes.
As the strategic housing authority for London, the GLC was responsible for the
development of Thamesmead  (see Case Study on Thamesmead) and certain other
housing areas.
       In November 1983, the GLC's Pollution Monitoring Group sponsored a 1-
day  conference on  "Contaminated  Land, The London  Experience"  for  London
Borough Council Members and GLC  officers.   Issues discussed  at this  conference
focused on three areas-a)  problems  arising from  the development  of  previously
untested  sites; b)  methods of assessing sites  prior to development;  and c)  the
need for  monitoring of remedial  measures.   The need for a central bank of
 information was  advocated as a valuable resource  for future  redevelopment.

 The Inter-departmental Assessment Panel—
       For any property considered by the GLC  for purchase or  redevelopment, a
 site history was prepared and reviewed by the Medical Advisor and the
 Scientific Services Branch.  A  site visit was made by the Medical
 inspectorate.  If deemed appropriate, a site  investigation involving sampling
 and analysis was then  initiated.
       For each specific contaminated site,  the GLC attempted to  determine  the
 most economic form of  remedial  action consistent with the intended land  reuse
  (GLC  1984b).  To accomplish this, the Land Pollution Group within GLC's
 Scientific Services Branch  established a systematic approach  and (with others)
 a code of practice to  carry out site investigations and assessments.  The  •
 inter-Departmental Assessment Panel, involving GLC officers  from several
 departments  played an important role  in the  assessment procedure.  Members of
  the multi-disciplinary panel provided  expertise  in the  following areas:
  environmental  science and analytical chemistry;  structural  engineering and
  statutory building control; environmental  health procedures;  health and
  safety;  horticulture;  hazardous waste  disposal;  disposal sites  licensing;  and
  construction coordination and management (GLC,  1984b,  p.  2).
        Each site investigation  began with an  inspection by the Inter-
  Departmental Assessment Panel and an engineer responsible for the sampling
  effort and preparation of the site history.  The sampling strategy (i.e.,  what

                                        52

-------
  was to be sampled and why)  was determined on the basis of this inspection.
  The actual field sampling was performed by the GLC site investigation team
  and analysis work was normally contracted to^a private firm or a university.
  The test findings were summarized in reports:by the GLC's Scientific Services
  Branch.   The reports were reviewed bJ the Inter-Departmental Assessment Panel,
  "to determine if the site presents anV form of environmental hazard to site
  users  and developers"  and "to make firm recommendations on the following-
  remedial works  to make  the  site  safe;
  preserving  the  integrity  of building
                                       health .and safety of site operatives;
                                       structures and buried services;
 classification of  surplus  excavated material Arising  from  site works;  and
 establishment of suitable  conditions ^or trees and plants"  (GLC,  1984b, p.
                                                                            3).
        The Panel's recommendations are^ stated' in a formal report which was'on
 occasion provided to DOE  (specifically to the; CDEP) for comment.  After
 review, the Panel's final report was provided to developers and contractors
 interested in contracting for the sit4 work. ' As remedial work and site
 development proceeded, the Scientific Services Branch and specialists from 1-he
 Assessment Panel continued to be involved with the site, dealing with specific
 problems as they were encountered.
       In addition to dealing with con
                                       :amination at sites of specific interest
 to the GLC,  the GLC's Scientific Services Branch provided a service to London
 Boroughs who sought assistance with contaminated land problems.  Assistance
 was also offered to District Surveyor^ in Inner London when building control
 matters were addressed.   (The District Surveyors are responsible for
 implementing the London  Building Act fior Inner London.)

 Guidelines  for Site Assessments—

       The Scientific Branch of the GLC, as early as 1979, suggested
 guidelines to be used during site assessments \to define  various levels  of soil
 contamination.  Under  these guidelines
                                        the degree of soil contamination is
classified as  "uncontaminated,•  "slight contamination,"  "contaminated,
                                      ,               .       	,  "heavy
contamination," and "unusually heavy contamination."  The ranges of
contaminant levels corresponding to thl various classifications are based on
comparison with typical "uncontaminated" soils.  These guidelines differ from
the tentative trigger levels developed
                                       by the ICRCL in that the levels are not
                                        —            	  	 — --.—• .b •_ y ^ -t. *_> »«i.l_ ^ J.l\-'\-
derived through an assessment to establish an -acceptable" level, and they do .
not necessarily imply adverse effects levels, jThe GLC guidelines, which
pertain to various metals and certain other contaminants or hazards are listed
in Table 4.
                                      S3

-------
   TABLE  4  GREATER LONDON COUNCIL DEFINITIONS  OF CONTAMINATED  SOILS  -
   SUGGESTED RANGE  OF VALUES  (mg/kg  ON AIR-DRIED SOILS, EXCEPT  FOR pH)

Typical
Values for
Uncontaminated
Parameter Soils

pH (acid)
pH (alk)
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper (avail)
Lead
Lead (avail)
Mercury
Nickel (avail)
Zinc (avail)
Zinc equiv
Boron (avail)
Selenium
Barium
Beryllium
Manganese
Vanadium
Magnesium
Sulphate
sulphur (free)
Sulphide
Cyanide (free)
Cyanide total
Ferricyanide
Thiocyanate
Coal Tar
Phenol
Toluene extract
Cyclohexane
extract

6-7
7-6
0-30
0-30
0-1
0-100
0-100
0-500
0-200
0-1
0-20
0-250
0-250
0-2
0-1
0-500
0-5
0-500
0-100
0-500
0-2000
0-100
0-10
0-1
0-5
0-100
0-10
0-500
0-1
0-5000
0-2000 -
Slight
Contamination

8-9
30-50
30-50
1-3
100-200
100-200
500-1000
200-500
1-3
20-50
250-500
250-500
2-5
1-3
500-1000
5-10
500-1000
100-200
500-1000
2000-5000
100-500
10-20
1-5
5-25
100-500
10-50
500-1000
2-5
5000-1.0%
2000-5000
Unusually
Heavy Heavy
Contaminated contamination contamination
more than
4-5
9-10
50.-100
50-100
3-10
200-500
200-500
1000-2000
500-1000
3-10
50-200
500-1000
500-2000
5-50
3-10
1000-2000
10-20
1000-2000
200-500
1000-2000
5000-1.0%
500-1000
20-100
5-50
25-250
500-1000
50-100
1000-2000
5-50
1.0-5.0%
5000-2.0%
2-4 (less than 2)
10-12
100-500
' 100-500
10-50
500-2500
500-2500
2000-1.0%
1000-5000
10-50
200-1000
1000-5000
2000-1.0%
50-250
10-50
2000-1.0%
20-50
2000-1.0%
500-2500
2000-1.0%
1.0-5.0%
1000-5000
100-500
50-100
250-500
1000-5000
100-500
2000-1.0%
50-250
5.0-25.0%
2.0-10.0%
12
500
500
50
2500
2500
1.0%
50000
50
1000
5000
1.0%
250
50
1.0%
50
1.0%
2500
1.0%
5.0%
5000
500
100
500
5000
2500
1.0%
250
25.0%
10.0%
       1980) .

Additional Guidelines by the Greater London Council:
       A combustibility hazard may exist  if the calorific value of a soil sample  is greater than
       7 MJ/kg.
       Surface deposits containing asbestos should be removed.

       Guidance for heavy metals should be taken from the values proposed by the  ICRCL.
                                             54

-------
        In December 1983, the British Standards Institution ' (BSI) issued  for
  public comment a Draft British Standard Code of Practice for the
  Identification and Investigation of Contaminated Land (BSI, 1983).  This
  document was  drafted by the BSI Technical Committee EPC/47  - Land Quality,
  which  includes some  30 representatives from a variety of disciplines,
agencies, and programs  (Lord, 1983).
existing BSI guidance on site assessm
purposes provided in the 1981 British
                                        The  document  is  intended to complement
                                       ents  for  building and civil  engineering
                                        Standard Code of Practice:   site
 Investigations  (BSI,  1981) .
        The 1983  Public Comment Draft Code which deals with the investigation
 of sites possibly contaminated with tkxic, obnoxious, or aggressive  substances
 was described in a paper by D. W. Lord at the Reclamation 83 Conference and
 Exhibition.  Excerpts from Mr. Lord's
                                       paper  (1983) follow:
        "It  is  the  objective  of  the  Code  to  offer guidance on:
        a)   How to assess whether an investigation is needed.
        £>)   How to plan site investigations.
        c)   How to execute site investigations.
        d)   How to establish the degrej* of contamination of a site.
        "The Code in essence gives guidknce on how to produce the  information
                                                  or protecti
       yM« Code is n°t' however, designed to provide guidance on what
       response there should be to any particular level or type of
       information0? alth°Ugh refe^nces are made to appropriate sources of
       A multidisciplinary approach to
Code deals  in  detail  with planning for
of an adequate onsite investigation.
selecting the number of  stages  of  sampling  (i.e.,  sampling  on  a  single
occasion or over a period -of time), t
                                      site investigations is emphasized.   The
                                      sampling and the methods and techniques
                                     The strategy of site sampling includes
                                       number of sampling points needed, and
                                      I           —  	-jr — —"a xrv ••.** ^-^f  iA^^^-A^vj.,  am
sampling patterns  (i.e., systematic ank nonsystematic) (Lord,  1983, p.  181).
Specific sections address the sampling and onsite  testing of ground  (or fill)
water and other liquids, gases, biologkcal materials,. and radioactivity.
Laboratory quality control and post development monitoring are also discussed.
      The  final document will be  issued by BSI  as  a "Draft  for Development
for the Identification of Potentially Contaminated Land and Its
Investigation."  The document sets forth the currently agreed best practice
for site investigations.  It is expected to be made final in late 1987.

-------
    Dies
        of Sites Undergoing Reclamation and Redevelopment
      This section presents brief descriptions and chronologies of five
contaminated sites where redevelopment has followed reclamation efforts.   The
experiences at these sites illustrate some of the problems encountered and
solutions that have been implemented at contaminated sites in England.  The
solutions range from complete abandonment of redevelopment plans (due to
irreparable contamination) to complex and costly engineering solutions to
render a site suitable for development.

Gasworks Site A—
       A small gasworks was formerly operated on  a site in the  U.K.,
identified only as Site A  (Smith, 1982).  The Local Authority acquired the
derelict site intending to develop  low  rise municipal  housing and sheltered
accommodation for the  elderly. Underground tanks and serious contamination
were discovered when work was begun for sewers and roads.  Further
investigation showed that  the portion of  the  site intended for the elderly
housing had been the production  area of the  gasworks and  was severely polluted
with tars and other by-products.  Other portions  of the site were also
contaminated  due to deposits of  gasworks  wastes  as well as residues  from a
secondary metal recoverer or scrap  dealer.   For  the most  part, except in the
production area, contamination was  contained mainly in the top half-meter of
 soil.   There was also one area
 contaminat ion.
                                of the site that was relatively free of
 area
       Plans for the site development were altered to avoid disturbing the
      of highest contamination.  The plans to locate housing on the former
 production area were
                     abandoned.  The production area was covered with 1 meter
                                                                      with
                                                                      with
                                                                          less
(3.28 feet) of soil and made into a decorative garden.  -In the areas
contamination, the top half meter of soil was excavated and replaced
clean fill.  A clay cut-off trench was installed to prevent lateral
contamination from the production area into cleaner areas.
 Becton Alps, London Borough of Newham—
        The large waste tip known locally as  the  Becton  Alps was  formed by
 spent materials and wastes from operations at the Becton Gas Works and its
 associated by-products works.  The Alps  eventually covered an area of some 5
 hectares  (12 acres) and stood some 16 meters  (52.5 feet) above the natural
 surface.
                                        56

-------
 the largest coal gas plant in Europe
        Founded in 1868 beside the ThaiUs River,'  the Becton Gas Works was once
                                      (Netherton and Tollin, 1982).  The entire
 complex occupied 220 hectares  (543 adres).  The spent wastes which formed the
 Alps were tipped at the west end of the gas works site, beyond the by-products
         It is estimated that the original Becton Alps.tip contained 430,000
 works.
 cubic meters (563,400 cubic yards) of
 mainly of boiler ash, clinker, spent
                                       wastes.  These materials consisted
                                      iron oxide,  and lime residues.,  A large
 tar lagoon was located on the southern part of the tip, from which tar had
 permeated in all directions.  Coal tars had also been tipped usually in small
 quantities across the site.
       After the gas plant was closed,
 production site was purchased by Coun
                                       the major portion of the by-products
                                      ty & Suburban Properties Ltd.,  a firm
                                       public open space.  A "pleasantly
                                       estate known as the London Industrial
                                       by-products plant site adjacent to the

                                      of engineers, surveyors, and architects
 that specializes in industrial development.   In 1975,  outline planning
 permission was obtained for the overall development of the site,  including a
 plan to landscape the Alps for use as
 landscaped warehousing arid industrial
 Park" was  eventually developed on the
 Alps (Netherton and Tollin,  1982).
       A professional team consisting
 acting  on  behalf of the development firm prepared  an outline  scheme  for  the
 reclamation work.   A detailed  chemical  investigation was  also carried out  to
 establish  the  chemical contents of  the  various  waste materials in  the tip.
       The  proposed reclamation scheme which was undertaken in two phases
 retained most  of the tip material on  site in two separate mounds  (referred to
 as Northern Alps and Southern  Alps),  jeformed from the waste  of the  original
 Alps.   The  reformed mounds would be covered with well-compacted clay and top
 soil.   Only waste  from the tar lagoon would be  removed from the site.  This
 plan was submitted to  the DOE  by the  lUndon Borough of Newham and  subsequently
 approved.   Among the problems  to be d
-------
       "The aqueous solution of phenol is a weak acid and can form salt
       crystals when combined with cement hydration products.  The crystals
       grow.and destroy the surface of the concrete by internal pressure.
       Phenol also decreases the surface tension of water and increases the
       effective permeability.  This, together with fairly high chloride
       concentrations will increase the risk of severe attack to steel
       reinforcement."

       Drainage and sewer work were carried out at the site between 1975 and

1982 including laying a 2.4 meter (7.87 feet)  diameter surface water sewer.
The first pipelines laid within the Industrial Park were not guaranteed

against chemical attack,  so their use was restricted to areas where
contamination was known to be less severe.  Special measures were taken for

protection of the sewer work over most of the site.  Increased costs over
normal main drainage were 50 to 60 percent for manholes, 45 to 55 percent for
concrete pipes, and 25 to 35 percent for clayware pipes.  The following
descriptions of the protective measures taken for the sewer work are  from

Netherton and Tollin (1982):

       "The  2.4 meter surface water  sewer  was  protected  by  two  systems.  Where
       concrete surround was 'required both the pipe and  surround were
       completely wrapped  in  PVC nitrile sheeting,  the sheeting being
       protected  against mechanical  damage on  both sides by layers of  Bidem
       U34 	   Joints  in the  nitrile  sheeting were  welded to  provide a,
       complete seal.  The prestressed  concrete pipes without  surround were
       coated at  the factory with  a  2 mm thick solventless  polyurethane —.
       This  coat  was protected  against  mechanical  damage by a  3 mm thick GRP
       outer coating."

       "After 1978  concrete pip'es  made  with sulphate-resisting  cement  were
       used for the larger diameters.  They were all  fully  wrapped  in  0.5  mm
       thick PVC  nitrile  sheeting  which in turn was surrounded in a  layer  of
       Bidem U34.  The  sheeting was  held in position  on  the pipes and  over the
       joints by  16 mm wide stainless steel bands.... Although a completely
       full seal  could not be achieved the wrapping prevents a continual
       replenishment,  by groundwater movement, of  those  chemicals which could
       attack the pipes  and cause  an eventual  breakdown."

       "Small diameter pipelines were laid in vitrified  clayware.   It  was
       decided ...  [in order to protect the Hepseal joints  from attack by
       phenols]  to wrap all the joints in PVC nitrile sheeting with straps on
       either side of the sockets."

       "A majority of manholes have been protected with a PVC nitrile  sheet
       1.00 mm thick sandwiched between two layers of Bidem U34."

       Control of Drainage—To provide for drainage during the construction

 phases,  a 500 mm thick drainage blanket was laid  over the  present tip and at
 the base of the  new parts of the  tip.   This blanket  directed the drainage to a
                                       58

-------
  series of s.oakage wells,  600 mm in diameter, sunk into the underlying gravel
  strata.   After completion of the site work, percolation of' water into the tip
  win  be minimized by the  clay sealing layer.  Runoff from the surface will be
  collected in perimeter drains and cab be directed into the normal surface
  water system.
        Encapsulation of Toxic Wastes-The reformed Northern and Southern  Alps
  were  sealed  with  a clay layer 1.2 meters (3.9 feet)  thick with a 300 mm layer
  of topsoil.  A 225 mm thick drainage
 clay and j.oined 'to the underdrainage
 drainage layer also acts as a vapor  ]
                                       blanket was laid immediately beneath  the
                                       blanket at the base of the tip.  The
                                      path for gases generated by the waste  in
           -_ __	„„.=, &0 a  vat}lJL pacn ror gases  generated by the wa<
 the tip.  Vertical pipes from  the granular  layer through the clay were
 installed to vent the gases.
       Structural  Stahi 1 ity-Soft alluvial clay and peat typical of the
 Docklands area underly the site, and
                                       stability problems arise in developing
                                          ---- ~* £""• — *-'•*•• — ni*j  «_*.J_ .LOC Ail \J.*S VW-LOPl
such areas because the soft soils are weak when  subject  to  rapid loading
                                                                             It
                                                                    oang
 is characteristic for such soils to ckin in strength if loading  is applied
 incrementally over a period of time, allowing porewater to be expelled  from
 the soils upon consolidation.  Strength data applicable to such  soils were
 available from other projects and calculations were made to determine the  time
 required for the consolidation.  On 4is basis, the placement of fill was
 limited to a 3 meter (9.8 feet) thickness in any 4-week period; an  internal
 angle  of friction of 30 degrees was Jsed as design criterion for the fill
 (Netherton and Tollin,  1982) .
       The strength of, the waste materials in the Alps posed another problem
 Much of the waste material in the Northern Alps consisted of contaminated
 building rubble with a  clay and silt matrix.   Based on  the existing slope
angles, the waste materials  appeared
                                      to have good long-term strength, although
                                              — '  - -- -- ~~s *-* -—••*-*" «-• *—^ *J.iAy \^n f
its stability could be adversely  affected by the  buildup of porewater
pressures,  .Thus it was decided to uJterdrain all the new fill both at its
base and at .the interface with the existing  Alps.   Piezometers were installed
in the foundation soils before fill placement to  monitor porewater pressures
                                                                            s
during construction.  it was recognized that some of  the material  to be fiLled
                                               Locations within  the fill area
 in the mound would be too wet for compaction
                                      K    ^ij..   _—,__,J.ViXtJ w j. ^j.ij.11 unt; i. o. j_ j. a.ir€5c
 that would have minimal  effect on stability were designated for placement of
 such unsuitable material.
Malkins Bank, Cheshire—
       The  30-hectare (74-acre)  Malkins
1932, was the site of a salt and chemical
and water from the stream were used for
                                        Bank,  from the  late  19th century until
                                          works.  Brine pumped  from the ground
                                        manufacturing processes  (Wilson and
                                      59

-------
Smith, 1980).  When the operation was closed, the stream was culverted,  and a
considerable area of the site was covered with lime sludge in three large
lagoons.  Since 1932, Malkins Bank was the site of indiscriminate dumping of
various industrial wastes.  Eventually, these wastes, including thousands of
drums, covered about half of the site up to a depth of 15 meters (49 feet)
above the culvert  (Wilson and Smith, 1980).  By 1970, odors from the waste,
described as smelling of "rotten eggs and torn cats" could be detected miles
away.
       A preliminary investigation of the site was carried out  by Harwell.
Rather than attempting extensive chemical analyses to characterize the site
contamination, Harwell surveyed the  local chemical industries  to learn what
types of wastes had been deposited at  the Malkins Bank.  Cooperation was
excellent, and this approach revealed  that a wide variety  of wastes were
present  including  large quantities of  chemical sludge and  oil  (standing  in two
shallow  lakes), baled paper, and  tannery wastes.  Chemical drums were piled  in
mounds and scattered in the chemical lakes and through the dried-out lime
sludge.  Some drums contained  reactive substances  (e.g., metallic  sodium)  that
caused some  minor  explosions.   In spite of the extensive chemical
contamination on the surface at  the  site, water  pollution  problems were  not
judged to be serious (Wilson and Smith,  1980).   The  deep layer of  lime  sludge
had served  to protect underlying strata from the chemicals placed  near  the
surface. The  stream,  although polluted from the chemical  waste, was already
polluted by treated sewage which was discharged  upstream.
       A decision was made  to dispose of the hazardous wastes  on site and  to
use the area for recreation.   Reclamation work was carried out in  1974  under
Harwell supervision.  Huge pits were dug in the  lime wastes.   Chemical  drums
were then deposited in these pits and covered with lime sludge, in effect,
 encapsulating the drums and their contents.   Brushwood was spread over the
 lakes of chemical sludge and then covered with sand and soil.   Baled paper was
 removed from the site to a municipal waste landfill.  The site was finally
 covered to a depth of at least 0.5 meters (1.6 feet) with material brought
 from borrow pits in nearby fields..  Finally, an extensive surface drainage
 system was installed, and  the site was developed as a public  golf course.
        Because of  the disposal of hazardous  chemicals on the site,  it is
 important that future disturbance (such as  laying of foundations  for
 buildings) be avoided.  The title deeds to  the property indicate  that futur'e
 disturbance of the site is considered undesirable, although there is no
 statutory requirement to this effect  (Wilson and Smith, 1980).
                                        60

-------
  Beaumont Leys,  Leicester—

        The 800-hectare (1976 acre) Beaumont Leys site is situated on the
  northern boundary of the city of Leicester.   From 1890  until  1964,  the site
  which was owned by the Local  Authority  (the  Leicester City Council),  was  used
  as a treatment  works and sewage  farm.   The sewage treatment operations
  consisted of  settling out the majority  of the solids  as sludge  and
  distributing  the supernatant  liquor oy  field irrigation.   The sludge  was
  spread over an  area of about  80  hectares  (198 acres).   After drying,  the
  sludge was.plowed into the soil.  Thl area used for effluent irrigation was
  extensively and productively  farmed.  After  closure of  the  sewage works,  the
  land was  let  to tenant farmers producing potatoes and cereals.  In  the late
  1960's, the area of  the  treatment works' and  farm was proposed for a satellite
  town,  with a projected population of 40,000 and incorporating residential,
  industrial, commercial,   educational, and recreational areas.  Initial  concerns
 about the suitability of the site for development (because of possible
 bacteria) were dispelled when the'Public Health Laboratory determined that the
 site was free of pathogenic bacteria]
       The more serious problem of hejivy metals on the site was uncovered
 almost by accident when one of the tenant farmers sought assistance from the
 Agricultural Development and Advisory Service (ADAS)  because of large
 variations in yield from different fields.   Upon analyzing soil samples from
 the fields,  the ADAS determined that the land,  especially the area that had
 been used for sludge spreading,  contained high concentrations of zinc,  copper,
 and nickel.   Possible phytotoxicity was related to  the  "zinc equivalent"
• (zinc equivalent = zinc + 2 copper +
available  metal  in ppm of dried soil)
                                     8 nickel, all measured in terms of
                                        The desirable zinc equivalent is 250
ppm; the levels for the sludge spreading area were found to be 6,000 ppm
(Keeps, 1982).  As a result.of this finding, the plan for redevelopment of the
area was reconsidered.   By  this  time,
had been spent on  sewer  construction
development.
                                      however, some £100,000 ($240,000 U.S.)
                                     Ln preparation for the planned housing
       A thorough investigation was initiated to assess the extent of the
contamination problem.  During  1970-1971, samples taken at  61-meter  (200-foot)
intervals on a  (rectangular grid basiji) were analyzed  for lead, cadmium,
copper, zinc, chromium, and nickel,  ikaps were prepared to  indicate  the  levels
of the various metals as contours.  Tile high cadmium levels  (up to 61 mg per
kg dry,soil) found in the sludge spreading area were considered to be the most
significant in terms of public health
gardens.and allotments in other parts
as controls.
                                      risks.   Soil samples from private
                                      of the  city were also analyzed to serve
                                      61

-------
      The analytical data were reviewed by the Physical Environment
Subcommittee of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Chemicals in Food and the
Environment.  This Subcommittee eventually advised the Leicester City Council
that "Development could proceed on the Beaumont Leys site provided that the
top two feet of soil was removed from the area previously used for sludge
disposal."  However, the prescribed removal of 700,000 cubic meters (915,500
cubic yards) of contaminated soil to an approved disposal site posed a
substantial problem, and the clean topsoil needed to cover the site was
unobtainable.  The cost of this proposed approach to prepare the site for
development proved to be prohibitive.  The development of private housing and
council housing was continued on parts of the site away from the sludge
disposal area, and other options were explored for an acceptable approach for
remediation of the sludge disposal area.
       The site was brought to the attention of the newly formed ICRCL in
1976, and thus began a concerted  effort involving people of various
disciplines to seek a safe and practicable reclamation approach to allow
development of Beaumont Leys.  Upon  careful  examination of the original
analytical data  for the entire site,  it was  determined that  lead and  cadmium
were  the metals  of concern in the sludge  disposal  area, and  thereafter,  the
presence  of other contaminants were  disregarded.   It  was  also determined that
cadmium was the  critical  element  in  the other areas of the  site  since the
ratio of  cadmium to lead  was such that  if cadmium levels  were acceptable,  then
lead levels would not pose a problem.  These observations greatly  simplified
the analytical data gathering and interpretation as well  as the decisioiflnaking
regarding what actions  should be taken.
       The subject of tolerable dietary limits had been addressed by  several
 recognized organizations—the CDEP,  the Food and Agricultural Organization,
 the World Health Organization,  and the Commission of  the European Communities.
 On the basis of recommendations regarding dose/effect relationships,  criteria
 for cadmium (5 ppm) and lead (600 ppm)  were fixed to guide the residential
 development at Beaumont Leys (Keeps, 1982).  A limit of 12 ppm for cadmium was
 used as a limit for the surface layers of parks (Smith,  1982).   It was
 apparent that the area used for sludge spreading was not suitable for normal
 housing with gardens because of the possibility of cadmium uptake in
 vegetables grown there.  The sludge disposal was therefore rezoned to restrict
 use to industrial areas, parks and a town center with a possibility  of  some
 flats  (without gardens).
        Two sites in the areas of highest  contamination were designated as
 public open spaces.  Schemes have been designed for.  these sites to provide
 tipping space for surplus material.  Soils  containing the highest
                                        62

-------
  contamination  levels  are tipped firs
  uncontaminated subsoil  and graded to
  pertained to soil sampling.   Samples
  in the concentration.  Later  samples
   then covered with several meters  of
 form mounds and play areas.  Areas  to be
                              -      -- 	• ".^.^.1^.= amu t*j.eiy areas.   Areas to b<
  grassed are covered with topsoil containing not more than 12 ppm  of cadmium.
         One  important lesson learned ik the Beaumont  Leys soil investigation
 taken at  2-,  4-,  and 6-foot depths using
                                  -      	 — - /  •=* /  L. aepcns using
  a hand auger showed consistently high  levels of cadmium with little variation
  in the concenhT-at-ion   T.=«-,?,•». -.-.__n	,__,     ...
taken with a mechanical digger showed
                                	.^^ i.un.cll W.LUH a roecnanicai digger  showed
  that below the topsoil layer,  the metal contamination dropped to insignificant
  levels.   It was then realized that  «U  action of the hand auger had
  contaminated the samples at depth with  surface material,  thereby giving
 misleading analytical results.  This
    allow mixing in order to achieve a
        A system was devised to ensure
finding eventually  led to the revised
                                         	_,  ~. _»»_^^j. j.j, j.W \-.ii
alterations  the  plant had undergone during its century  of  operation.
^ 1 TYl^ t-Viy-^'.-t44-_  -	_..•   . i
time the site  investigation was undert
leveled.  The .retaining walls of two g
diameter, respectively,  could still be
college had previously  occupied the area
                                    —	»— "••«•» fj- = vxwua>j.y  occupiea cne a]
south of the wall;  buildings associated with the gas works had occupied the
area north of the wall.   No detailed plans were available to  show the various
                                                                        At the
iken,  buildings on the site had  been
is holders,  34 meters and 20 meters  in
distinguished on the northern portion

-------
of the site.  Based on a site plan from 1950, a third 20-meter diameter tank
was also believed to be present.  Underground concrete tanks originally used  >
for tar storage were visible on the northern edge of the site.  At the tune of
the site investigation these tanks were filled with tar and rubble.
       During the initial site  investigation,  trial  pits  were  dug through the
permeable sandy  silt to  a depth of 2.5 meters.  The site is underlain by a low
permeability clay at about  2.5 meters. It was found that the  site was heavxly
contaminated with tar, complexed  cyanides,  and phenols, particularly near the
base  of the 20-meter gas holder tank.  It was also  learned that  the holder
tank  had not been cleaned out  thoroughly, but simply  filled with demolition
rubble and  other material when the  site was cleared.   The  larger holder tank
also  contained demolition rubble.  Water had also entered  these  tanks
       The  second phase of  the site investigation involving 51 trial pits dug
on a  10-15  meter grid was  carried out in  1983 and provided a  more detailed
assessment  of the contamination.   Numerous  large diameter  cast iron pipes
 linking the ovens with the purifier and gas holders were found buried on the
                                            , -t ->   i. _	- .! _*  +-l-i ,-> •= T»^;a ^\ "F t™ r"l£*P!£*
 site.  Contamination,  mainly
 pipes. It was
              also  determined that  there  had been  some  lateral  spread of
                                    originally believed to be clean.   The
 contaminated material into the area o
 trial pits s
 layer of water-bearing gravel overlying clay was
           iuggested that some groundwater infiltration had occurred'(a thin
                                                 ^countered at 2-2.5 meters)
 Ground water samples taken from the area near
                                               the base of the gas holder tanks
 and from the
             holder tanks were found not to be severely contaminated,  however,
 and could be disposed to a  foul  sewer at a  slow rate.
        The building to be erected on the site was  sited partly on
 contaminated area and partly on  the "clean  area
                                                                 the
                                                   It was
  order  to  have  a clean
  material  (down to the clay bed at
                                    determined that in
base with known geotechnical characteristics, all the
                                  about 2 meters) beneath the designated
                     	 removed and replaced with crushed rock and compacted
                     foundations of concrete and brick were encountered on the
building area should be
sub-base.  Massive
site.  Mechanical concrete breakers were
                                           used to break up these foundations so
  that they could be removed.
        Contaminated soils were
                                removed to a depth of one meter over the entire
  site.
         greater depth was  removed  in areas  of particularly heavy
  contaminat ion (i.e
«n««u—~	-, beneath buried pipes).   In  all,  10,000  cubic meters  of
contaminated  solids were removed from the site.    A substantial  quantity  of
                also removed.  Approximately  14,000 cubic meters  of  crushed
  liquid tar was
  rock and sub-base were r
                        •equired to bring the site up to final  level.
                                         64

-------
       A thin  layer of tar covered th= water in the 20-meter holder tank.
 Although the water was not highly contaminated and could be'disposed to  a  foul
 sewer, the tar layer posed a problemj
 manner:
                                       This was dealt with  in  the  following
         Water from the 20-meter holeer was pumped into the second 20-meter
 holder which contained soil and rubble.  Tar-free water was then removed from
 a sump dug into the rubble.  The tar
                                     was absorbed on the solid material.
 removed from the site and disposed.
 tarry material in bulk, but transport
 viscosity.   Tar was also encountered
 absorbing onto contaminated solids.
       The planned car park extended over the area of the 34-meter holder
 tank.   It was determined that removal
 be necessary.  The water level in the
About 60 cubic meters of liquid tar from the concrete tar tank was absorbed
onto contaminated solids.  The contaninated solids with the absorbed tar were
                                     Originally, it was intended to remove the
                                      problems arose because of the low
                                     in other receptacles and disposed of by
                                      of the tank and its contents would not
                                      holder was lowered by pumping to the
 sewer.   The concrete retaining wall was broken down to 1 meter below final
 level,  and one meter of the rubble was removed.
       The ultimate disposal of material from the site was determined by the
 level  of  contamination.   Uncontaminat
                                        material was removed to the local
 landfill.   since the local landfill site was not licensed to accept
 t~qf\t*\ 4™ s» n*i -I •»•» ±* 4- f\*3 Trt-n *-,-,•»*••£—, ~i .*.   .j ^ _	  	_-___..!    .   .    .    _
 contaminated materials,  it  was  necessary to truck a large quantity of material
 to distant  sites.  Most  contaminated soil and rubble was transported to a
 licensed  landfill  25  kilometers from the site;  tarry materials could not be
 accepted  at this site and had to be  tal
 kilometers,away.
       During  the site reclamation phase, a mobile laboratory was set up on .
 the site  so that' chemical analyses results could  be obtained rapidly.   These
 analyses  were used to determine the  ultimate  disposition of  various  classes of
                                     aken to an appropriately licensed.site 40
contaminated materials.  A large tank
a temporary storage facility for contaminated  liquids encountered during  the
site reclamation.  As a precaution to
spread on to public roads by the trucl
were set up on the site.

CASE STUDY:  CORBY STEELWORKS, CORBY,

      The  town of Corby  is  located in
English Midlands, about 160 kilometers
                                     prevent  contaminated material  from being
                                     :s, a wheel  spinner  and washing facility
                                      (45,000-liter  capacity)  was installed as
                                     NORTHAMPTONSHIRE
                                      Northamptonshire (Northants)  in the
                                       (100 miles) north of London.   Corby  is
the site of a former British Steel Corporation (BSC) steel mill.  During the
1930's,  integrated iron and steel works were developed at Corby based on the
                                      65

-------
local  ironstone reserves.   In 1950, the  steel works provided about 70 percent
of the town's employment.   In order to provide a balanced urban environment
around the steelworks,  Corby was designated a New Town  in 1950.
       During the  1960's and  1970's,  declines  in  the iron and steel industries
led to increasing unemployment in Corby.  On November 1,  1979,  the BSC
announced its decision to close all but  the tube mill portion of the  steel
works  at Corby, eliminating some 7,500, jobs.  Additional jobs in industries
related to the steel  production were  also eliminated.   This staggering  loss of
employment in the town prompted an  intensive marketing  and redevelopment
program to attract  new industries to  Corby.
       Following closure of most of the  steelmaking facilities  in 1980,  the
Corby  District Council acquired 138 hectares  (340 acres) of the  former  BSC
plant  site.  Portions of this land  were contaminated as a result of many years
of heavy industrial use during a time when environmental controls  were  not
deemed important.   The Council began clearance and  remediation work at  the
site  in 1981 with efforts aimed at  making the land  available for redevelopment
by  industries  that  would bring new employment opportunities to the Corby area.
Considerable government assistance  has enabled the  reclamation program to move
forward rapidly.
        Ambitious redevelopment programs  were also undertaken at other sites in
Corby including land reclaimed  from mineral workings.  By mid  1981,  some  162
greenfield hectares  (400 acres)  had been opened  up for development,  with
several factories under construction or scheduled (Corby Works,  1985, p.  3).
Designation  of the Corby Enterprise Zone has  also helped to attract new
industries.  Corby's central location has been an important  factor in the
success of the redevelopment initiatives.
        With a population of 55,000, Corby is now the  second largest town in
Northamptonshire.  The tube  plant operated  by BSC continues  to employ some
 4,500 people making  tubes  from imported coiled steel.   Although the steel
 industry  remains the largest single employer,  some 250  new firms have
 Authors' Note:  Information for this case study was obtained during a site visit to Corby during
 March 1985.  we met with Mr. Geoff Read, Community and Technical Services Officer,  Corby ^strict
 Council; Mr. Peter Hussey, Project Manager,  Corby District Council; and Mr. Rod Ibbotson, Civil
 Engineer and Reclamation Consultant.  The discussions focused on the reclamation efforts (both
 completed and planned) and Corby's redevelopment program.  We saw some of the new industrial
 areas including the Enterprise Zone and spent most of an afternoon walking the former BSC site
 (guided by Mr. Ibbotson), observing the reclamation efforts in progress.
 We appreciate the thoughtful hospitality extended to us by our hosts  the helpful information
 they provided, and the opportunity to explore the reclamation site.  We are impressed by what we
 learnld in Corby and agree with the statement made in 1984 by Trade and Industry Secretary,
 Nomat Tebbit--'It's not just government policy that has been helping to bring jobs back to
 Corbv   It is in very large part due to the initiative of all the people of Corby who have shown
 what can be done by a cit? o? a town which goes out determined to sell itself and the quality of
 its people.•
                                          66

-------
 established facilities in Corby since 1980, creating some 5,000 new  jobs
 (Corby Works, 1984, p.. 3).  By the eid of 1984, Corby 's unemployment rate was
                                               ,
 only slightly higher than the Nationl average (Corby Works, 1985,
                                                                       10).
        This  case study focuses  primarily on those sites  formerly occupied by
 the BSC Works where site reclamation to deal with contamination had to precede
 any redevelopment activity.  It has do be emphasized, however, that the
 success of the contaminated land redevelopment program is linked to an overall
 planning and promotional initiative that includes newly developed greenfield
 lands as well as reclaimed sites.
       The Corby District Council and
                                      the BSC have undertaken reclamation of
 some,of the iron ore mining areas around Corby, restoring the land-for
 agricultural or amenity uses.'  These efforts have involved mainly filling and
 landscaping rather than the kind of remedial work required for. contaminated
 land reclamation.  (See Authors' Note
 Land Use History and Redevelopment Objectiv
                                       below.)
Steelmaking in Corby —

      The  first  steel produced  in  Corby was made by  the  Thomas -Gilchrist
process (named for Mr. Sidney G. Thomas and Percy C.  Gilchrist,  who developed
                                              The plant,  conceived by British
                                        1934.
                      .          .    oma
 the process  in the 1870 's)  in Decembe|
 and German engineers, was  to be "Europe's foremost  integrated steel and tube
 making plant"  (50th Anniversary of Stjel  Making,  1984) .   The Thomas process '
 was designed to produce steel from thi low grade, highly phosphoric
 Northamptonshire sand ironstone available locally.   The  ironstone  was  readily
 accessible beneath outcroppings of liiLstone  and  could be retrieved through
 open cast-mining.   The  limestone was also used  in steelmaking and  as local
 building stone.   The high phosphorus content  in these ores made  them
 unsatisfactory for making high qualit4 steel  by the  customary processes.  The
 Thomas  process involved a basic Besseiyer  converter lined with an alkali-
                                                                 The Thomas
dolomite which would produce a basic  slag, rich in phosphorus.
steel thus produced was satisfactory for all classes of tonnage steels.
    .  The  BSC  steelworks,  located to |he northwest of  the  Corby town center,
was a fully integrated facility including mines, sintering plants, blast
furnaces, steelmaking operations, tube
and waste treatment and disposal.  In
                                      -works, coking with by-product recovery,
                                      the sintering plant, iron ore was burned
with fine coal and a flux to produce clinker which had the advantage of being
more easily smelted than the original
charged to blast furnaces where it was
carbon alloy of iron (pig iron).  The
                                      ore.  Clinker from the sinter plants was'
                                       smelted with coke and reduced to a high
                                      blast furnace gases were scrubbed to
                                      67

-------
remove dust and then used for fuel.  This scrubbing produced large quantities
of slurry that were disposed in nearby excavations.  A great deal of water was
used in the process to cool the furnace and for gas washing.
       Pig  iron from the  blast  furnaces retained the phosphorus present  in  the
iron ore; its removal was accomplished in the next stage of the process.  The
pig iron was fed to the basic Bessemer converter.   Freshly calcined dolomite,
ground with hot tar was used to line the converter, the perforated bottoms
being lined two feet thick and replaced daily.  (Dolomite is a limestone
mineral  [calcium magnesium carbonate]; it is calcined  [burned] to produce
caustic lime [calcium magnesium oxide].)  During the conversion process, the
phosphorus from the pig  iron combined chemically with the excess lime to form
calcium phosphate which was skimmed off as slag.  The slag, containing up to
20 percent phosphorus, was ground and sold as fertilizer.  The Thomas steel
produced in the basic converter could be made into boiler plate, pipe, tubes,
sheets, or structural steel.
       Cokemaking was  also an important  part  of  the steel works  as  coke  was
essential to both the ironmaking and steelmaking operations.  To produce the
coke, coal was heated in ovens built closely adjoining one another  in
batteries or banks.  The heating caused the volatile constituents  from  the
coal to be driven off, leaving the  "fixed carbon" and  the incombustibles
 (ash).   In by  product coking, the gases from the coke  ovens are subjected  to a
systematic treatment to  remove water and to recover tar, ammonia,  and
condensible hydrocarbons.  Following removal of these  products, the coal-gas
 (a mixture of  carbon'monoxide, hydrogen, and light hydrocarbons) may be used
as fuel  either in further firing of the coke ovens or  for other purposes
 (i.e., lighting or  driving gas-engines).
       Several by-products could be recovered from the coal tar through steam
distillation—aromatic hydrocarbons  (benzene, toluene, xylenes, naphthalene),
creosote oil,  and pitch.  Recovered products were  also refined  on  site.  Water
 (gas  liquor) condensed from  the coal gas contains  ammonia,  hydrogen sulfide,
phenolic compounds, and  other  contaminants.  This  water  would normally  require
treatment  before being discharged  or returned to  the process.
       Normally, there is a surplus of gas beyond that required for heating
 the  ovens  and  raising steam  for the distillation  operations.  For  most
 applications,  it is desirable  to  further process  the  gas to remove hydrogen
 sulfide, cyanide, and the last traces  of tar.   The fuel  gas may be cleaned by
 passing it through iron
oxide (iron sponge).   The spent oxide (a deep blue
 friable material—colored by ferric ferrocyanide)  was disposed as a waste or
 used in the production of sulfuric acid (ICRCL 18/79, 1983,  p. 3).
                                       68

-------
 recovery processes involved enormous
        These various ironmaking,  steelmaking,  and coking with by-product
                                      amounts of materials handling and
 chemical processing equipment and required large areas for stock piling coal
 and ore.  For each 100 tons of pig i|on, the blast furnace consumed about 200
 tons of ore, almost 100 tons of coke  and 50 tons of limestone.  For every 100
 tons of pig iron produced, there wer<| 50 tons of slag, 11 tons of dust and
 more than 500 tons of gas.  Almost 3,000 tons of water were used.  Substantial
 quantities of limestone and dolomite were consumed in the basic Bessemer
 converter, and a large'volume of slac[ was'produced for the fertilizer plant.

 Redevelopment at Corby—

       Several areas of Corby have beon designated for reclamation and/or
 industrial expansion.   The areas involving the most extensive reclamation work
 lie adjacent to the still active BSC tube works.
       A major focus of Corby's redevelopment program has been the Enterprise
 Zone.   This is an area of 113  hectares (just under 280 acres)  designated by
 the Central Government for industrial and commercial  development.   Firms
 establishing facilities in the Enterprise Zone benefit by special  tax
 exemptions and other advantages.
 be set up in England.
  The
       Since its opening in June 1981,
 portions  of the Weldon and Earlstrees
 successful.
                                      Corby Enterprise  Zone was  the  first  to

                                       Corby's Enterprise Zone,  which occupies
                                      Industrial_Areas,  has been particularly
             By autumn 1983, there were 82 companies established within the
Zone, and employment was 2,200  ("Red Tape to  Finishing  Tape," 1984,  p. 1).  By
mid 1984, all the designated land was either  occupied or under development
with a mixture^of purpose-built premises and  speculative factories.  About 70
percent of the'total investment in the Enterprise Zone  is from firms building
premises for their own use.  The Commission for New Towns has provided a
number of advance factories (mainly ai.uminum-clad, single story  structures)
which are offered for lease.
       Not all of Corby's development
     land is  in  the  Enterprise  Zone.   In
particular, the Willow Brook Industrial Area, reclaimed land which was
formerly occupied by the BSC and whici is now being redeveloped, is outside
the designated Enterprise Zone.
apart from the Enterprise Zone.
described below:
There are also other redevelopment sites
The -j-arious Corby redevelopment areas are
                                     .
      Weldon  Industrial  Area—The  Weldon  site  lies  adjacent  to the east
boundary of the 'BSC Tube Works and is
privately funded.  The area was once vorked for minerals, and nearly half was
used by the BSC as a coal-handling and stocking area.  The designated-
     being developed for heavy industry.
                                      69

-------
Enterprise Zone areas are Weldon South, 15.65 hectares (38.67 acres) and
Weldon North 53.4 hectares  (132 acres)  (Corby Facts, 1985, p. 6).  Firms who
have located facilities at Weldon are engaged in a wide range of operations
including computer manufacture; electronic systems; chicken processing; ABR
Chemicals  (starch, gluten); roof trusses and frames; stone processing; and
sheet rubber manufacturing.
       Earlstrees  Industrial Area and Extension—Located  to the  north of  the
town center and northwest of the BSC Tube Works, the  Earlstrees Area has been
under development since the mid  1950's.  The area had been used for mining in
earlier years.  The original Earlstrees development comprised 120 hectares
 (297 acres) for light industry and  included standard advance unit factories.
Part of the site was later  included in  the designated Enterprise Zone; this
area occupies  44 hectares  (109 acres).  An additional 40  hectares  (100 acres)
overlying  an old ironstone  quarry were  slated for development beginning  in
 1984.  Because of the former underground workings,  special  consolidation or
other  special  foundation techniques are required to prepare  these sites  for
building on the site  (CDC notes,  1985).  The various firms  now  established in
 Earlstrees are currently producing  and/or distributing aluminum, breakfast
 cereals, cosmetics, crisps  (potato  chips),  flour, glass,  plastics,  and carpet.
       Willow Brook and Phoenix Park Industrial Areas—These sites include
more than  142  hectares  (350 acres)  of former BSC land which have been partly
 restored and  cleared of railway  materials and iron  and steel facilities. The
 Phoenix Park  Industrial Area,  lies  adjacent, to  the  west  boundary of the  active
 BSC Tube Works.   The area  includes  the site of  an  old sintering plant and the
 former Glebe  Coke Ovens.
       The Willow Brook Industrial Areas are located on the north side of the
 BSC Tube Works.   Two  areas are designated for development—the  Willow Brook
 West  and  Central  Industrial Area,  and the Willow Brook East Industrial Area.
 Both  these areas  are  targeted for light industry development.   The West and
 Central Area had been worked for ironstone  in  the  early  years of steelmaking
 in Corby.   Following cessation of the mining,  the  area was filled.   In
 subsequent years,  slurry wastes from various processes  in the steel works were
 deposited on a portion of the site (Barry
 were  eventually covered over.  The Deene
 products  recovery)  was
                                           1984,  p. 1).   These slurry deposits
                                         Coking Plant (which included by-
                       later constructed on part of the site with some of the
Coking Plant operations extending over the slurry deposits.  Some portions of
the site were also used by other smaller industries including a company whose
business involved asbestos.
                                       70

-------
  Industrial Estate is being developed
  the  south of Corby.   Light industry,
  warehousing or distribution projects
        Oakley Hay Industrial Eat-.«fr...—Tha 20 hectare  (50-acre) Oakley Hay
 on previously unworked land located to
 high technology enterprises, and
 are being encouraged for this development
  area.   Oakley  Hay  adjoins  the  village  of  Great  Oakley,  and care is  being taken
  to maintain the natural  setting  of  tke village.  Among  the firms that  have
  taken sites at Oakley Hay  are  the Oxford  University  Press.
 Nature and Extent of the Contamination
        The chemical contaminants found on the former BSC property include
 heavy metals, cyanides, sulfur salts
  naphthalene and other volatile  organics.
 coal tar, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, various oily wastes, phenols, and
 asbestos.  The specific contaminants present and the extent of the
 contamination varies greatly over the site, reflecting the nature of the
 previous use of each area.
       The nature and extent of contamination at the Willow Brook West and
 Central Industrial Area are described in reports prepared for the Corby   •
 District Council by W.  S.  Atkins  & Partners (Atkins)  who conducted an
 investigation over some 30 hectares (|74 acres)  of the site in the spring and
 summer of 1984 (Volume  1.  "Report," authored by D.  L.  Barry,  1984;  and Volume
 2.  -Tnal Pit Logs and  Data,"  Atkins,  1984).  An earlier ground investigation
 (Norwest Hoist,  1982) was  conducted for the Corby District Council,  and a
 limited chemical investigation of about 10  hectares (25  acres)  had  been
 carried out  on behalf of the Commission for the New Towns  by  Bostock Hill and
 Rigby  Limited  on  a  portion of  the  sit
 Atkins (Haiste International Limited,
 investigations are  included in the At
 subject area is shown  in Figure 4.
e south of the area investigated by
 1984).   Findings from both of these
tins'  reports.   The location of the
       The chemical investigation reported by Atkins actually involved the
northern portion of the Willow Brook kst and Central site.  Three main areas
were distinguished-an area of slurry deposits, the area of the old by-product
coking plant, and the remaining  (variously used) sites.  The areas of the
investigation are indicated in Figure 5.  Based on historical data and
findings from the earlier investigations, a decision had been made by the
Council to remove the extensive slurr^ deposits and to fill the excavation
cavity with a suitable engineering material (Barry, 1984,  p. 1).  This
excavation was determined to be necessary in order to achieve bearing
                                      71

-------

                                                                                 id
                                                                                 o>
                                                                                 01

                                                                                I

                                                                                •o
                                                                                 c
                                                                                 nS
                                                                                 4J
                                                                                 C
                                                                                 0
                                                                                 u
                                                                                  o
                                                                                  0
                                                                                 CQ
                                                                                  a)
                                                                                  X
                                                                                  4J
                                                                                   Dl
72

-------
             ••*.
                                   ::•::•/ * V 1
                                                                  O

                                                                  2
                                                                 03


                                                                  §
                                                                 4J
                                                                 (0
                                                                 0)
                                                                 g
                                                                 to
                                                                 w
                                                                 0)
                                                                 to
                                                                 w
                                                                 §
                                                                •H
                                                                4-1
                                                                 10
                                                                4J

                                                                §
                                                                u
                                                                4J
                                                                05   n
                                                                id   (!)
                                                                0,  S
 (C
 a ^
•H  (ti
 u  k
 C 4J
•H ,C
 M  0)
Hi  O
                                                              IT)


                                                               0)
                                                               Di
             00
                                                                            CO
                                                                            en
             01)
             u
             f-i

             g
73

-------
conditions suitable for building.  Except for some concrete piles and
caps, all of the above-ground and below-ground structures and foundations had
been removed from the site prior to the investigation (Barry, 1984, p. 1) .
       The principal  objective  of the  investigation was  "to  determine  the
nature, degree and extent of chemical contamination in the ground insofar as
it would be relevant to the proposed  industrial development"  (Barry,  1984, p.
2)   Another objective was to determine if the material overlying the slurry
deposits was suitable for burial  in the cavity after the slurry deposits were
excavated.
       The selections of sampling locations and the chemical tests to be
performed were based on site history  and  on  the proposed use of the sites.
Trial  pits were  dug  to a depth of about 3.5  meters  (11.5 feet), and samples  of
soil and water  (if present) were taken at various depths.   The  locations
selected for  the sampling pits were adjusted as  far  as  reasonable to  conform
to a sampling grid  of  50 meters (164  feet)  on the eastern  part  of the .it. and
75 meters (246  feet) on the western part; additional sampling points  were
 selected as  deemed relevant (Barry,  1984, p. 4).   Where there was evidence of
 gases from a given trial pit  (i.e.,  odors or organics apparent)  the opening
 was covered with plastic sheeting and left for 24 hours before  testing for
 gases (Atkins,  19841.   A total of 399 soil samples and 37  water samples from
 149 pits were analyzed for chemical components (Barry,  1984, p. 5) .
       The specific  chemical tests performed on the various  samples were
 selected based on the chemicals likely to be present (based on past  land use)
 and on the sensitivity of the proposed development to those chemicals.  The
 chemical  tests performed for .soil and water  samples from the different areas
 are indicated in Table 5.  The  five  types of contamination  explored  in  these
 tests are acidity/alkalinity;  cyanides;  organics  (e.g. phenols,  coal tars);
 sulfur  salts and chlorides; and heavy metals.  Cyanides and organics were
 considered to be the critical  constituents  in assessing the degree of
 contamination and the extent  of excavation  and removal measures  warranted at
 the site. The  tests showed problem  levels  of acidity/alkalinity to  be "rarely
  in evidence"  (Barry, 1984, p.  6).
        High levels of sulfate and/or sulfide were found in almost all samples
  and at  all  depths.   This occurrence  of  sulfur salts throughout the site could
  be due  in part to  natural  conditions (i.e., as  a natural  constituent of ores
  and clays prevalent in the area) and also as a major component in the slurry
  deposits and residues  from the coking and related operations (Barry, 1984,  p.
  7)   It was concluded that excavation and removal of all  the sulfate
  contaminated soils was not a viable option because of the enormous amount  of
  material involved.
                                        74

-------
TABLE 5.  RANGE OF CHEMICAL TESTS PERFORMED ON SAMPLES FROM THE VARIOUS
            AREAS  OF THE WILLOW BROOK CENTRAL AND WEST SITE*
                                  I  '
Chemical Constituent Type Samples
or Parameter
Determined


PH
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (C.O.D.)
Soil

Slurry Depos
Area
S,W

W
Ammoniacal nitrogen
Cyanide (total)
Cyanide (free)
Ferrocyanide
Phenols (total)
s,w
s,w
—
s,w
Toluene extractable (total) S,W
Coal tars (total)
Arsenic
Cadmium
Copper
Lead
Nickel

Zinc

Chloride
Sulfide
Sulfate
Sulfate (2:1 soil
extract)
Thiocyanate
s,w
s
s,w
'
B




—
s,w
s,w
water
—
W
* Source: Barry, 1984, p.. 15
^^H^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^_
7
^ 	
Tested for Each Site
(S) ; Water (W)

it Coking Plant
Area
s,w

W
W
S,W
S,W
W
S,W
s,w
s,w
s,w
s,w
_ —
s




s
s,w
s,w

s
W
Area


Other •
Areas
S,W
!«•*/**
W
W
s,w


s,w
t—i 1 11
s
3 t
S
S,W
s
s

s

s

s,w
s,w
i—ffll
s
W
5

-------
The results of the chemical tests showed heavy metal contamination to be
related almost exclusively to the slurry deposits.  It was decided that
specific quantification of individual heavy metals was not indicated unless
other contaminants of concern (i.e., phenols and other organics, cyanides, and
sulfur salts) were not present at significant levels and landscaping proposals
were extensive  (Barry, 1984, p. 4).  The basis for this decision was that
excavations or extensive clean cover would be required if contaminants of
concern were present at significant levels, and therefore the presence of
specific heavy metals would not alter the action to be taken.  Alternatively,
if the other contaminants were not present at significant levels, then the
concentrations of specific heavy metals should be determined since their
presence could possibly adversely affect landscape workers and plantings
unless special precautions were taken.  Arsenic, cadmium, and lead were
determined in all soil samples;  other metals  (copper, nickel, and zinc) were
determined in selected samples.
       Some materials were found at the site that were considered to be
 "special"  wastes that would require disposal  in  an appropriately  licensed  tip.
Materials  in this category  include  crystalline,  Prussian-blue solid  (rich  in
 cyanide);  phenols,  coal tars, and  "other"  oils;  and asbestos.   The
 contaminants noted  on the  site  imply  risk  from several perspectives.
 Construction workers, buildings, and  plant life  could be  adversely affected by
 exposure  to cyanides, organics,  and sulfur wastes.  Groundwater supplies might
 also be affected.   The presence of  organic compounds, which  particularly
 threaten  to enter water  supplied via  plastic  pipes,  strongly influenced the
 remedial  steps  recommended for  the  affected areas (Barry  1984,  pp.  2-3).   The
 nature and extent  of the  contamination found  in  the  various  areas of the  site
 are described below.  Contaminant levels were compared to the guidelines
 recommended by the Greater London Council  (GLC)  (See previous discussion  of
 these guidelines and listing in Table 4).

 Slurry Deposit Area--
       Most  of the  slurry deposit area was  covered by clay capping and other
 overburden material which varied in thickness from about 1.0 and 3.0 meters
 (3.3 and 9.8 feet).  In a few locations the overburden was deeper (as much as
 4.5 meters), and in a few areas the slurry deposits were apparent on the
 surface.   The overburden material which had been brought from various offsite
 locations consisted of "top soil" boulder clay,  slag, rubble, gravel or sand
 (Barry, 1984,  p. 7).  In some locations, chemical analyses showed the
 overburden material to contain significant levels of contaminants.
                                       76

-------
 area.  In some locations the deposits
       The extent of  the buried  slurry deposits varied  considerably over the
                                       were quite deep, extending  from near  the
 surface to 9 meters (almost 30 feet) Jeep.  In other areas the deposits filled
 less than a meter.  Data (Atkins, 1984} from one trial pit located in the
 central portion of the slurry deposit area are presented in Figure 6.  All the
 data from the Atkins'  investigation a:re reported in this manner.
       In the area of the coking plant
 deposits,  cyanides,  phenols and other
 were found in high concentrations (At:
 phenols at levels greater than 3.0 ppm.   Of these samples,  six contained
 between 10  and 50 ppm,  and one sample
                                        that  extended over  the buried slurry
                                       coal tar derivatives, and sulfur salts
                                       cins, 1984) .  Twenty eight samples showed
                                       was reported as 50.8 ppm (Atkins, 1984).
 GLC guidelines classify soils containing 3-10 ppm as "slightly contaminated"
 and 10-50  ppm as  "contaminated."   Heajy cyanide contamination was prevalent
 along  the  line of the former overhead gas main.   The area to the west of the
 coking plant  area was found to have relatively low contamination levels.
       The slurry deposits contained cyanides, organics, sulfur salts, and
 heavy  metals.   A  majority of the  samples were classified as  heavily
 contaminated,  based  on the GLC guidelines (Barry,  1984,  p.. 8).   Significant
 levels of  heavy metals were found in 48  samples  of the  slurry deposits from 45
 boreholes  (Atkins, 1984).   Arsenic lejels ranged from 29 ppm to 140 ppm with
 more than  half the samples showing levels greater than  50  ppm.  (GLC guidelines
classify levels of 50-100 ppm arsenic
ranged from 1 ppm to 13.8 ppm with 40
                                       as  "contaminated.")   Cadmium levels
                                       samples  showing higher than 3  ppm
highest measured lead level was 4,800
showed zinc levels ranging from 1,100
ppm are designated "contaminated" ace
 cadmium ("contaminated"  according to GLC  guidelines).   Lead levels  were higher
 than  1,000 ppm in  all  but  one  of  the slurry samples, and 27 samples had levels
 exceeding 2,000 ppm ("heavy  contamination"  according to GLC guidelines).   The
                                       ppm.   Eleven  slurry deposit samples
                                       ppm to  11,000 ppm  (levels  exceeding  500
                                       •ding to GLC guidelines).
      Cyanides  at  levels  labeled  as  "contaminated" based on  the  GLC
classification  (25 to 100 mg/kg air dried sample) were found in 54 percent of
the soil samples taken from the slurry
total of 18 samples from 14 boreholes
                                       deposit area  (Barry, 1984, p.  8).  A
                                      showed total cyanide at greater than  100
ppm.  The three highest levels were 5ob, 880, and 1,700 ppm total, cyanide  (as
CN); these samples contained 26, 120, knd 300 ppm free cyanide  (as CN) ,
respectively  (Atkins, 1984).  Based on the GLC guidelines, these three samples
would be designated as containing "unusually heavy contamination" from
cyanide.
                                      77

-------



























?
I







~j O
0 	 .7. 	 ^



u

D

0







s
"
s
J-
8





































ffi








I
*


1
; "1
l
: 1


I »i
i *«
- "s
5 «"







!>> u
i| J?
i» 6
! S





e

21 =
^

s i
z 1
<
3 ]


K
Ki
^
1
5
e
1 ^

» r*.
t r+
< **>
l •
i O

[ i
! S
| II
! 1






















O
f«4















£

1
CO <
o





o

00
£






*r
a
i
s
»
*



0 0
rt *
,,ll 	 11

^
?
u
 g
!• «
i % f
i s. i
* s *
*" tfe i?

i f 11 1
| m OQ*M m
| i
S _£ - - -
„
( * i^ i-. «j












t
i





















w
!«
5£ .
« ."
f « W
VI •»• ^
US
a,B*o>— -
'Zsl
*°-f J
en «




























|g2osa58
H 3 S
M
UJ «0 •£
U) «O V
jJS°S?8So£j ^
3 = s
I
•
•Q
«
1

•H
CO
Q
81
-0
&

r- 1
' 10


-------
       Ten percent of the samples contcined organics  (toluene extractables) at
 levels of 1 to 5 percent;  these sampleb  are classified as "contaminated" by
 GLC guidelines.   Sulfide concentration^  greater than 500 mg/kg were found in
 58 percent of the samples.   This level
 "unusually heavy contamination"  for suLfide.
 Coking Plant Area—
       A number of operations were car:
                                       meets  the GLC  classification  of
                                       ied out in the coking plant area.  In
                                      1
 addition to the  coke ovens  and coke wharf,  there  were various process stages
 to  condense the  water and tars from the coking offgases  and to recover tar,
 sulfur  gases (for acid production),  ammonia,  and  hydrocarbon products.   The
 various structures and process areas once active  in  the  plant area included  a
 condensation tower,  detarrers,  tar storage  tanks,  sludge tanks,  ammonia
 washers,  sulfuric acid plant,  propane -;ank, naphthalene  washers,  naphthalene
 storage tank,  liquor coolers,  liquor tanks, and decanters.   The  contamination
 encountered in this  area  is entirely consistent with the previous use of the
 site  (Barry,  1984, p.  9).   There was generally heavy contamination from
cyanides and organic  compounds, mostly
                                       confined to the upper 0.75 meter  (2.5
                                        In one area cyanide-rich residues  from
                                              Heavy metals and sulfur  salts
feet) of ground  (Barry, 1984, p. ii).
an old gas main were present on the surface.
were also found extensively.

Other Areas--
      In addition  to high  levels of sulfur salts,  found throughout  the
remainder of the site,  occasional pockets with high concentrations of organics
and heavy metals were found.  Slurry deposits in the northwestern section of
the site contained high concentrations
                                       of sulfur salts and heavy metals;
cyanides and organics were also present .  A lime plant slurry lagoon was
located in the western section.  The western edge of the site had been
occupied by a series of minor-sized industries.  High levels of cyanides and
phenols were found in this area  (Barry,
western edge of the site had been used
                                        1984. p. ii).   One section at the
                                       by a company whose operations involved
asbestos.  Although there was no visua] evidence of asbestos, it was expected
that asbestos materials were present id the topmost layers of soil.
Remediation Activities

      Decommissioning of  the  BSC works
announced.  At the same time,
District Council to acquire the plant
                              negot iat i ons
                                      site
began soon after the plant closure was
   were  commenced  for the Corby
   for redevelopment.   In the  initial
                                      79

-------
phase of the site reclamation effort, all equipment, materials, above-ground
structures, and foundations were removed.  Foundations and underground pipes
were located from existing drawings of the former plant and from visual
examination of conditions at the site as excavations proceeded.
       In April  1981 contracts  initiated  by the  BSC  to  demolish most of  the
plant structures were turned over to the Council to be implemented as part of
the reclamation and redevelopment effort (CDC 1985) .  An agreement was worked
out whereby BSC would salvage scrap metal from  its vacated Corby facilities;
this material was to be removed for recycling in electric arc  furnaces at
other locations.  Some new problems occurred as a result of the BSC salvage
operations when a number of pipes containing hazardous material were severed.
The materials leaked onto the ground, resulting in additional  cleanup costs to
the government.  Visual examination was  relied upon in judging the need for
removal  of obviously contaminated material.
       The  Corby District  Council  let additional contracts  to  complete
demolition of the former steel works structures.  The  last major project was
the demolition  of a 110 meter  (360 feet) sinter plant  chimney  in June 1984. A
local landmark  for  many years, this  stack was the last tall structure of the
Corby steelworks  ("Environment...",  1985, p. 4).  Due  to the high unemployment
rate which spurred  the industrial redevelopment program in Corby, local labor
was used extensively in the reclamation  efforts.  All  contracts in the
reclamation efforts that began in 1981 have required 75 percent of the  labor
to be provided  by local workers  (CDC, 1985).
       The  site reclamation plan was developed on the basis of the detailed
site assessment work described previously.  An  effort  was made to determine
the extent of contamination within the various  areas and to excavate and
dispose  of materials in a manner that would preclude future problems with
chemical contamination.  Considerable excavation was required.  Most of the
excavated material  was redeposited at different onsite locations.  Some
material judged to  be  "Special Waste" or heavily contaminated waste was
transported offsite for disposal  in  specially  licensed facilities.
       The  buried slurry deposits,  which were deemed unsuitable for
engineering purposes, were  excavated and removed to the Deene Quarry Area.
Although the  slurry deposits  showed  significant levels of  contamination, they
were not considered to be  "Special Waste" as defined in the Control of
Pollution  (Special  Waste)  Regulations  1980  (SI  1980 No 1709).
       The excavated slurry "hole" provided a convenient receptacle for
materials  excavated from  other nearby locations.   The  material overlying the
slurry deposits (thickness  varying  from 1.0  to 3.0  m)  was  not deemed to be  a
Special Waste,  although the high levels  of cyanides and organics  in this
                                       80

-------
 material made it unsuitable for use as
 material be deposited iri the base of
 materials were also placed in the
 the contractor who performed the site
 contaminated materials placed in the
 at  least four meters below finished
 level  of any likely sewers,  whichever
 filled slurry pit would finally be
 preparation for site development.
       The contractor also recommended
 evidenced as blue crystalline substanc
 asbestos,  shall be disposed of to a
 statutory regulations (Barry,  1984,  p.
     top, soil.   It was recommended that this
   the slurry excavation.  Other excavated
slurry "hole."   W. S. Atkins and Partners,
    assessment,  recommended that all
   excavation should be at a depth that is
  ground level  or one meter below the lowest
    is lower (Barry,  1984, p. v).   The
 capped with clean boulder clay in

    that any "hotspots" of contamination,
    3s (high in cyanide),  tars or  oils,  or
   special"  tip in accordance with the
     v) .
Coking  Plant Area—
       Reclamation  of the site of the former Deene By-product Coking Plant
involved excavation  and  removal  of the buried  slurry deposits  (disposed of  in
the Deene Quarry) and removal of some cyanide-contaminated  residues  classified
as Special Wastes to a licensed  tip  (Biirry,  1984, p. 9).  The  entire area was .
stripped (0.5 to 1.0 meter of ground removed)  to  remove soils  containing
cyanides, organics,  and  heavy metals; deeper excavations were  required  in the
northeastern sector  where organic contaminants had penetrated  to a depth of 3
meters  (9.8 feet)  (Barry, 1984,  p. 12)1  The site of the coke  ovens  (bank of
some 50 ovens) was reclaimed by  stripping the  top 2.5 meters  (8.2 feet)  of
ground and then filling  with clean stone.   In all, reclamation of the site
involved excavation of approximately 0
yards) of material  (CDC, 1985).  Following the removal of the excavated
material, the site was overlaid with 0
cover, which consisted primarily of boulder clay.
landscaping were also provided.

Other Areas--
      A former  slurry  lagoon  located  ii  the  north  central portion  of  the
Willow Brook West and Central Area was reclaimed to a depth of 2.0 meters
(6.56 feet) and backfilled with slag  (Barry,  1984,  site plan).
      In the  Phoenix Park  Industrial  Area, ironmaking works  (including  two
    75 million cubic meters  (981,000  cubic
     5 to 0.75 meters  (1.6 to 2.5  feet) of
                Drainage provisions and
sinter plants and four blast furnaces)
structures were also removed.
    were demolished.  Foundations from the

-------
       In  February 1984,  the  Corby  District  Council adopted a  local budget
which allocated of £3.5 million  ($4,678,000) for land reclamation.  This
included £2,810,000  ($3,755,800) for land reclamation/infrastructure at the
Phoenix Park Industrial Area; £575,000  ($768,500) for land reclamation at the
Weldon Industrial Area; and  £115,000 ($153,700) for land reclamation at the
Soot Banks area southeast of the town  (Corby Civic News, April 1984, p. 5).

New Roads—
       A new road to link the Earlstrees and Weldon  Industrial Estates  was
constructed in 1984  through  the Willow Brook West and Central  Industrial Area.
This road construction progressed  even as the  extensive site  reclamation work
was underway.
Site Reuse

       The Corby District Council recognized early that the land vacated by
the BSC would have  to  be reclaimed  and  restored  to productive use  if  jobs  lost
to the steel  works  closure were  to  be replaced.   Although  other  Corby sites
could be  developed  more  rapidly  and easily,  particularly with the  designation
of an Enterprise Zone, the available land apart  from the former  steel works
site was  limited and-could not support  sufficient industry to restore local
employment  to the former level.   Both immediate  and  future development
planning  was  needed.  It was this recognition that spawned Corby's aggressive
and innovative  efforts to assure continuing industrial development.
       Efforts to develop industrial land and attract new industry to the
Corby area  are  coordinated through  the  Joint Industrial Development Committee,
which  includes  representatives from the Corby 'District Council,  the
Northampton County  Council,  the  Commission for the New Towns, and  British
Steel  Industries.  In 1980,  this Committee developed a "Strategy for Corby,"
described as "an all-embracing community plan which  recognized  the immediate
problems  and proposed solutions  to  meet the needs of the  community in terms of
employment  through  attraction of new diversely based industry,  maintenance and
improvement of  the  built environment..., and improvement  of the town's
transport links" (CDC, 1985).  Reflected in this plan are  the  reuse of the
reclaimed BSC land  for industrial expansion as well  as the other developments
in the Corby area.
       The  fact  that the sites offered  are  in  some cases reclaimed
 contaminated land does not appear to have had any influence oh the
attractiveness  of the redevelopment properties.   Both the Corby District
 Council and the Commission for the New Towns offer industrial  land for sale  or

                                       82

-------
 lease.  The promotional  activities of
                        the  Corby Industrial Development Centre
 have greatly aided  the  effort  to attract new enterprises  (and jobs) to  the
 area.  Firms establishing  facilities in Corby are doing so for several
 reasons.  Some have moved  to Corby because of the need for larger quarters
 with future expansion room.  Some firms have consolidated operations
 previously located  in separate areas cjf the country.  In both these cases, the
 central' location, the benefits package offered,  and the available local work
 force have provided strong  incentives
       Future use  plans for the reclained BSC site focus primarily  on
 industrial development that will provide  a  substantial number of jobs.
 commercial development and amenity use
 will be built to about 40 percent capacity.   The Commission for the New Towns
 began development of the Willow Brook
 proceeded at the Willow Brook West and
 Christmas 1984,  reported that the form
                       for choosing Corby.
                        are also planned.
              Some
Eventually, the site
                       East Industrial Area as  reclamation
                        Central Areas.  The Corby  Civic News,
                       er Steel Works land is  "now seeing the
 start of the rebuilding process with the development  by Curver Products
 Limited" ("Rebuilding Our Town," 1984) .  The Curver Consumer Products'
 facility,  first announced July 11, 1984, is sited  on  a 5.67  hectare (14 acre)
 tract formerly occupied by the steelmaking operations.   Curver is a Dutch firm
 that  produces consumer plastics; they kxpect to provide some 240 new jobs in
 their first phase of operation at the new facility.
       Other sites on the former steel  works  land are  also near development
 stage.   The former site of the Glebe c|>ke Ovens was cleared  and ready for
 development in early 1985.   A combined heat and power generating plant  will be
 built on the former BOS plant site when demolition/excavation there is
 complete.   Land reuse following the reclamation is indicated in Figure  7.   A
 major shopping,  leisure,  hotel, and of::ice complex is planned for the eastern
portion of  the  former steelworks site.
development is  a combined venture by 1
                         The £30 million ($36 million)
                       >cal agents,  architects, builders.
surveyors, and  Corby District Council '(" £3 OM Complex. ..," 1984, p.  3).   The
first phase of  the  development plan was scheduled to begin construction  in
1985,   (See Authors'  Note below.)   Another shopping center is planned  for  a
site in the Phoenix Park Industrial Area formerly occupied by ironmaking.   All
remnants of the blast furnaces and sinter plants have been removed  and their
foundations torn out  in  preparation for the development.
    arero
HO=~  I
omcer?
Phoenix Centre Development Site has now been reclaimed and a new Supastore,
onal shops, petrol station, and car parking area,  have been constructed.  The
 the public in November 1986L  The remainder of the shops planned for the
 shortly.  The development of the railway station area is still to be
                                       83

-------

-------
       One reclamation area which had
many years is scheduled to be cleared
disturbed strata make  the site unsuitable
engineering work is undertaken.  This
visit.  A quarry site  adjacent to the
scheduled for reclamation for amenity

Criteria  for Cleanup
been used as a dumping site by BSC for
 and landscaped as  open  area.   The
     for  building unless major site
 site was fenced at the  time of our
 by-product  coking  plant site  was  also
 use (CDC, 1985).
       One of the main issues in the reclamation at Corby was how clean a site
must be in order  to be safe  for new development.   Since the  cleanup action is
funded entirely by Derelict  Land Grants, the _Local Authorities are intent on
seeing that the cleanup measures are very thorough, they want to avoid any
future problems from  inadequate site engineering or problems associated with
the contaminated  soils.  Ironically, the idea of building on formerly
contaminated land does not seem to be
in the assessment of the Willow Brook
of concern to the  firms moving  to  the
reclaimed sites.
       Guidelines  developed by the Greater London  Council  (GLC) were  applied
West and Central site to determine the
extent of excavation needed and an appropriate disposition of the excavated
materials (i.e., whether materials could be buried at some depth onsite or
whether offsite disposal at an authorized facility was warranted.  The GLC
guidelines specify concentration ranges that are considered typical for
uncontaminated soils as well as ranges representative of "slight
contamination," "contaminated," "heavy contamination," or "unusually heavy
contamination."  The GLC guidelines for total cyanides and for organics were
compared to the levels measured at various depths throughout the site.  Based
on this information, the extent of contamination that would remain after
different excavation scenarios was determined arid plotted on maps.  This
approach allowed graphical presentation of the effectiveness of various levels
of cleanup.
      A complete  list of the  GLC guidelines  is given  in Table 4.  The GLC
guidelines for total cyanides and toluene-extractable organics that were the
most critical in the Corby site assessment are listed below (values in mg/kg
on air-dried soils):
                                      85

-------
Value typical for
uncontaminated soils
Slight contamination
Contaminated

Heavy contamination
Unusually heavy
contaminat ion
Cyanide-total
0-5
5-25
25 - 100

100 - 500


greater than 500
Toluene extract
0  - 5,000
5,000  - 10,000
10,000 - 50,000
 (1 to  5 percent)
50,000 - 250,000
,(5 to  25 percent)
greater than 25,000
 (25 percent)
     The Regional Water Authority tends to promote more stringent cleanup
criteria than other responsible authorities might require for site
reclamation.  In particular, levels of phenolic compounds in excess of 5 ppm
are of concern because of the potential for tainting of drinking water.  This
concern by the Regional Water Authority arises because of the possibility of
formation of chlorinated phenols if phenolic compounds are present in water
supplies treated with chlorine.  Very low levels of chlorinated phenols  (below
0.1 mg/L) can cause odors and tainting of fish flesh.
    •Much of the site work at the former BSC site is being carried out to
insure adequate bearing capacity for building sites and suitable ground
material for installation of infrastructure'   Such work includes excavation
and removal of buried slurry deposits; removal of existing pipes (often  still
                                           i
containing process materials) and surface spils contaminated from leaks, and
complete removal of old foundations.

Funding; Assistance for Reclamation and Redevelopment

     Since the closure of the steel works, the Town of Corby has allocated
substantial resources to land reclamation and infrastructure to support  new
factories  (and therefore new jobs).  These efforts could not have been
supported alone by local tax revenues, especially in view of the high
unemployment problems faced by the region after the steel works closure.  The
grants and economic aid that Corby has received from outside sources has been
crucial to the reclamation and redevelopme.nt efforts and has enabled the work
to be accomplished without major increases in local rates.
     Shortly after the announcement of closure of the steel works,  Corby was
granted Development Area Status by the Department of Trade and Industry.  This
status qualifies Corby for Regional Development Grants and insures continuing
financial aid and incentives from Europe and the European Economic Council
(EEC).  Regional Development aid is available to the municipality to assist
                                       86

-------
 with funding for infrastructure such es roads,  power stations,  and treatment.
'works in developing areas.   Additional government funding assistance was made
 available when the Corby Enterprise zdne was opened in 1981.   Reclamation
 efforts  at the former BSC site in Cor^y have been funded by Derelict Land
 Grants from Central Government.

 Derelict Land Grants—
      Under the Derelict  Land Act  of 1982, grants  are provided by  the Central
 Government to provide 100 percent of the cost for the  purchase  and reclamation
 of  land  that i.s so damaged by  industrial use that extensive treatment is
necessary  in  order for the  land to be
awarded  to the  Corby  District  Council
hectares (340 acres)  of land formerly
adjoining  the BSC  Tube works is being
 Phoenix  Park  Industrial  Areas.   Both qhe  Department  of  Environment  (DOE)
Regional Office at  Nottingham and the
Skyline,"  1984, p.  9;  CDC Notes,  1985)
Derelict Land Grant, monies recovered
reclamation will be remunerated to Cen
                                      reused.  A Derelict Land Grant was
                                      for reclamation of approximately  138
                                      occupied by the BSC.  This  land
                                      developed as the Willow Brook and
                                      Central Directorate on Environmental
 Pollution  (CDEP)  in  London provided assistance  to  Corby  in  securing the
 Derelict Land Grants.   By the  end of 1984,  some £7.5 millions  (equivalent  to
 about  $11 million) had  been  spent on these  reclamation efforts,  and the 1985
 budget for  £3.5 million (just  over $4 million)  was approved ("The  Changing
                                         In accordance with conditions of the
                                      from land sales following site
                                      tral Government.  It appears unlikely,
however, that the  land values when  the  sites are ready  for  redevelopment will
totally offset the costs of  the reclamation work.
                                       Status—
                                       id by the Department of Trade and
Economic Aid Based on Development Area
     Regional Development Grants offer
Industry are paid in relation to new ajssets for qualifying industries which
include manufacturing and some service industries (Corby Facts, 1985, p. 2).
These grants can amount to 15 percent of capital costs subject to a limit of
f10,000 ($13,366 based on 1984 exchange rates) per job created by the industry
or, alternately, may be paid as a job brant of. up to 3,000 ($4,000 at 1984
exchange rates) for each job created (Corby Facts, 1985, p. 2) .  The grants
are ignored for the purposes of Corporation Tax.
     Loans are offered from the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) to
investment projects offering employment in former steel-producing areas  (Corby
Facts, 1985, p. 7).-  The reduced cost loans are available for up to 50 percent
of fixed asset investments; interest rates are reduced by 5 percent per annum
for the first 5 years of the loan, thu
                                      s reducing the average interest rate of
                                      87

-------
an 8-year, 11.75 percent loan to around 7.5 percent per annum (Corby Facts,
1985, p. 7).  The loans require strong security from the borrower in the form
of a mortgage on industrial property or bank guarantee.
     Regional Selective Assistance is available for certain types of
investment projects that offer benefits to the U.K. economy such as import
substitutions, increases in imports, productivity gains, or new technology
development/ demonstration.  Financial assistance may include phased cash
grants against capital expenditure; loan repayment guarantees; and Exchange
Risk Guarantees for ECSC loans (an important factor in securing the ECSC loans
described above) (Corby Facts, 1985, p. ,2)>.

Enterprise Zone Benefits—
     The concept of creating Enterprise Zones is a fairly recent program by
the Central Government to encourage industrial and commercial activity by
removing certain tax burdens and by relaxing or speeding up the application of
certain statutory or administrative burdens.  The first Enterprise Zone in
England was opened at Corby on June 22, 1981.  The program has not yet been in
existence long enough to determine its success or failure in the U.K. as a
whole.  At Corby, however, the incentives offered by the Enterprise Zone have
clearly been a positive factor in attracting new industries.
     The specific benefits for firms establishing facilities within an
Enterprise Zone are listed in the  "Corby Facts"  (1985, p. 6) brochure provided
by the Corby Industrial Development Center.  The following benefits are
available for a 10-year-period from June 22, 1981:
     1. Exemption from Development Land Tax.
     2. Exemption from local authority rates (local property tax) on
        industrial and commercial property.
     3. One hundred percent allowances for Corporation and Income Tax purposes
        for capital expenditure on industrial and commercial    buildings.
     4. Priority processing of applications and relaxing of certain criteria
        for certain customs facilities.
     5. Exemption of employers from industrial training levies and from the
        requirement to supply information to Industrial Training Boards.
     6. A greatly simplified planning regime—developments that conform with
        the published scheme for the zone will not require individual planning
        permission.
     7. Expeditious administration of those planning controls remaining in
        force.
     8. Reduction in Government requests for statistical information.
                                       88

-------
      The local government receives mo:iies  from Central Government to offset
 the loss in tax revenue.  While  Enterprise Zone tenants are exempt  from some
 of the extensive planning controls normally in force, they must comply  with
 existing pollution regulations.

 WANDSWORTH GAS WORKS, LONDON BOROUGH OF WANDSWORTH
     The  16-hectare (40-acre) site of
 located on -the south bank of the Tharm
the former Wandsworth Gas Works is
s River  in the London Borough of
                                      1S
Wandsworth.   The surrounding area  is occupied by industrial and utility
operations.

Land Use History and Redevelopment Obiectives
     The Wandsworth Gas Works began operation about  1860,  producing gas from
coal for about 100 years.  Coal for the works was brought to the riverside
site by barge.  The gas works site extended  some 550 meters (1,804 'feet) along
the Thames  River.  Other than gas manufacture,  the exact operations  (e.g. by-
products recovery and, possibly, refining)'carried out on the site are not
known.  During the time the plant was in operation,  many process changes
occurred altering the original plant design.  As there are no as-built
drawings to reflect periodic modifications in the plant systems, the exact
locations  of  underground foundations.
tanks, pits and pipelines are not known.
During  the  plant's operation, parts of the gas works  site were reclaimed from
river marsh;  process wastes, such as spent iron oxide from the gas cleanup
operations, were deposited to make new solid ground for plant expansion.  Some
wastes  were taken offsite.                  •                              '
     After  the plant was closed,  the GLC purchased the  site  with the objective
of developing it for housing.  The plant had been decommissioned and the
above-ground  structures removed.   Bas^d on findings in  1976  of extensive site
contamination,  the GLC determined (on
the basis of borehole  evidence)  that the
site was unsuitable for development as housing and that  redevelopment of the
site would have  to be planned for less sensitive  land  uses.
     At the western end  of the site,  d 20-hectar'e  (8-acre) area  was designated
for development  as a  refuse transfer station by the GLC  Department of Public
Health Engineering.   With the exception of -an area on  the  south  side which was
Authors' Note:  The information presented in this case study was obtained during a visit to the
site in March 1985 and from reports prepared by the GLC Scientific Services Branch, Land
Pollution Group (Goaman,  1983) and by the GLC Inter-Departmental Assessment Panel (GLC, 1983).
GLC Officers, Mr.  George  Lowe and Mr. Ray Carpenter accompanied the Authors on the site visit.
                                       89

-------
scheduled for use as a parking area, the remainder of the site was found to be
grossly polluted.  Remedial measures would be necessary prior to any
redevelopment of the site.  Figure 8 indicates the layout of the Wandsworth
Gas works site before demolition of the plant structures.  The redevelopment
objectives proposed for the site are shown in Figure 9.  Reclamation of the
gas works site to bring the land to a greenfield site condition was to be
initiated in late 1987.

Nature and Extent of the Contamination

     Investigations were carried out in 1976 and in 1980 to assess the extent
of the chemical contamination over the site.  It was found that ground
pollution from the gas works operations was severe, and the distribution of
the contamination appeared to be random.  In the 1976 survey, 343 samples were
taken from boreholes spaced over the site in a 30-meter grid.  Analyses of
these samples showed heavy pollution in some areas by coal tar, phenols,
sulfur compounds, and free and complexed cyanides  (Goaman, 1983).
     A 1980 investigation involving 40 trial pits focused on the western
portion of the site which was slated for redevelopment as a refuse transfer
station.   Samples from 24 pits indicated a considerable amount of combustible
material to be present.  Based on these findings,  it was decided that further
investigation over the remainder of the gas works  site should be carried out
to determine the extent of the buried combustible material and the presence of
methane.
     During July 1982, an additional 21 trial pits (actually slit trenches, in
some cases) were dug 3 meters  (9.8  feet) deep at various locations over the
site.  Severe pollution by liquid and solid residues was encountered, and
strong odors of creosote and tar were apparent from several of the pits.
Three workers employed by the Local Authority investigating road construction
problems became ill during the trial pit excavations.  It was decided that the
trial pit samples should be analyzed for the full  range of gas works related
contaminants  (as recommended by the ICRCL).  A total of 104 samples collected
from depths down to 3 meters were analyzed for gas works pollutants  (coal  tar,
free and complexed cyanides, elemental sulfur, sulfide, sulfate, phenols,
acidity).  Of these samples, 76 were tested for combustibility, based on
calorific value.  Five boreholes for methane testing were drilled down  to
depths of 12 to 15 meters  (39 to 49 feet) near the river.
                                       90

-------

-------
92

-------
     The section to the east of the refuse transfer station site and bounded

by the Thames River and the new Estate Road was found to contain particularly

high concentrations of pollutants.  The trial pit strata logs  (Goaman, 1983)
for pits A through H listed the types
Trial pit A
Trial pit B
Trial pit C
0.20 m Concrete
3.00 m Fill:    Soil,  brick rubble,  ashes,  coke;  all material
                              below 1.
              1.80 m of black liquid.
                        80  m colored black.
0.30
1.30
0.30
1.70
Trial pit D
Trial pit E
1.20
1.80
0.20
0.30
0.30
2.50
     m Concrete
     m Fill:    Top soil
                clinker.

     m Fill:  Ash, coke,
                        of materials encountered; these included
     m Concrete
     m Fill:    Brick dust,  ashes,  brick rubble,  and gas works
                waste.
                                      ,  brick rubble,  coke,  sand,  clay,  and
                                       top soil
                   m Sandy gravel: badly polluted with diesel oil at 2.50 m.

                   m Granite setts
                   m Concrete
                   m Hardcore
                   m Fill:    Soil,  black sandy gravel,  concrete,  peat,  and
                              clay.
Trial pit F




Trial pit G


Trial pit H
0.10
3.00
     m Concrete
     m Fill:    Ash,  cli
iker,  soil,  brown clay,  brick rubble,
                and pockjets  of  black material  between 2  and 3
                meters.

     m Fill:    Brick dujst,  sand,  coke,  clay,  ash,  old garden
                soil, and brick rubble.
3.00


2.60 m Fill:
                Ferrous
                concrete
                2.4 m of
Dxide,  ferric-ferrocyanide,  peat,  clay,
 (dig abandoned due to obstructions);
 black liquid.
     The specific levels of contaminants in samples of the materials listed

above were reported.  Some of the significant findings for samples from trial
pits A through H (summarized from the

listed in Table 6.

     Contamination from coal tar posed
1981) for soil contaminants.  In nine
                        detailed soil analyses reports) are
                         the most  serious  potential  hazard based
on the tentative guidelines recommended by AERE Harwell (Wilson and Stevens,
                        samples from the area,  coal tar was
considered to be at "unacceptable" levels for land used for industrial

purposes.  The number of samples with "unacceptable" coal tar levels increased

to 17 if the site were to be developed for public open space.
                                      93

-------
TABLE 6.  SUMMARY OF CONTAMINATION LEVELS INDICATING SERIOUS POLLUTION
                        AT WANDSWORTH GAS  WORKS  SITE*
Contaminant
             Level of Contamination
PH

Sulfate
Range: 2.6 - 10.9

Levels were consistently high over most of the site.
Highest level:  14.8 percent.   One or more samples
from five trial pits contained levels above 5 percent.
Sulfide
Cyanide  (CN-)
Phenols
Toluene extract
Coal tar
Elemental sulfur


Ferricferrocyanide


Thiocyanate


Free cyanide
Range:  Concentrations determined in 1980 were much
lower than in the 1976 tests, possibly due to long
time lapse between sampling and analysis.

Levels exceeded 500 ppm in one or more samples from
three trial pits.  Highest levels were at 1 m depth
from pit A.

Levels of 10 ppm were found in two samples from one
pit; all other samples contained 2 or 3 ppm.

Range: 500 ppm - 13.5 percent.  Highest level was
found in pit B.  Two or more samples from five
pits had levels above 10,000 ppm (1 percent).
Extracted material from pit H consisted mainly
of mineral oil.

Range: 500 ppm - 10 percent.  Highest levels were
found in pit B.  Levels in pit B ranged from 1.3
percent to 10  percent.  Levels in pit A (four
samples) ranged from 1 percent to 2.2 percent.
Levels in pit G (four samples) ranged from
5,0 0 0 ppm to 1.5 percent.

Range: 500 - 8500 ppm.  Highest levels were found
found in trial pit H.

Range: 100 - 5,000 ppm.  Highest levels were found
in trial pit A.

Level reported for all samples was 50 ppm except for
one sample from pit H which contained 290 ppm.

Range: 2 - 120 ppm.  Levels exceeding 50 ppm were
found -only in pits A, B, and H.
*Source:  Based on information in Goaman, 1983a, Appendix 2.
                                     94

-------
     It is assumed that high sulfide concentrations are present within the
ground, especially at depth.  The high levels of sulfates and organics
throughout the site would, under most
                                      circumstances, prompt, the need for
special measures to protect structures and services below ground.
     Methane was detected in three boreholes.   It was believed to arise from
decomposing natural organic material within undisturbed ground below the
filled area by the Thames River.  Ten
combustibility (including four samples from an area identified as a coal
bunker) had calorific values greater than 6,978 kJ/kg (3,000'Btu/lb).

Remediation Activities
                                      of the 76 samples tested for
     After the site for the refuse transfer station was developed,  it was
concluded that remedial action would be required to 'enable development of the
                                       southernmost part which was intended to
be used for truck parking.  (This southern area was considered to be substan-
tially free from contamination and required no special remedial activity.)  It
was recognized that disturbing the contaminated ground would release foul
odors and,toxic gases  (hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen cyanide, volatile
hydrocarbons) and that mixing the various contaminated.soils could further
complicate the potential hazards to workers at the site.
     After evaluating the available site investigation data for the site, the
GLC Inter-Departmental Assessment Panel recommended the following protective
measures  (GLC, 1983a):
     a)   Protection of the workforce.
     b)   Reduction of site disturbance
     g)   Avoidance of deterioration tc
                                       to the  minimum possible.
     c)   Avoidance of excavation which would create spontaneous combustion
         risks.
     d)   Minimizing the amount of surp'lus excavated material  for disposal.
     e)   Containment of pollution and provision of a barrier  layer for long-
         term protection.
     f)   Creation of conditions suitable for planting and maintenance of
         landscaped areas.
                                       structures  and services.
     The excavations carried out in ccnjunction with the proposed Estate Road
had revealed extensive obstructions below ground from the old gas works
                                    ,d
operations.  A number of pipelines had been disturbed during this work which
resulted in the inadvertent release of tar and other liquids.  The various
building foundations, tanks, pipelines, and other structures below ground were

                                      95

-------
considered to pose a major pollution problem if further removal operations
were undertaken since removal of these obstructions would entail contact with
solid and liquid residues from the old gas works.  Recognizing that it would
be virtually impossible to avoid deep excavations altogether, the Inter-
Departmental Assessment Panel (1983a) noted that for excavation below a depth
of 1.5 meters  (4.9 feet), mechanical ventilation may need to be used.
Examples of essential excavations include trenches for water mains and sewers.
     Heavily polluted material excavated from the site should not be returned
to the excavations if the material is judged to pose a serious hazard to
buried installations or to workers who might come in contact with the material
in conjunction with maintenance operations.  Any surplus materials excavated
from the site will be subject to disposal in accordance with the Control of
Pollution Act 1974.  Coal-derived liquors and tars and any excavated spoils
found to be exuding tars are classified as "Special Waste" for handling and
disposal.  Other solids are classified as "Hazardous Industrial Waste."
Before discharge of any water from the site,  including discharges to foul
sewer, permission would have to be obtained from the Water Authority.  No
discharge into the Thames River would be allowed.
     Some additional recommendations ,for remedial works given by the Inter-
Departmental Assessment Panel (GLC, 1983a) are summarized below:
     •    The site should be  filled overall to a depth of 1.2  meters  (3.9  feet)
         with imported granular  fill (excepting the  area occupied by the  new
         metropolitan road and the truck parking area at the  southern edge of
         the site).   This level  of fill  should provide an acceptable
         environment for most utility services to the site.
     •    Consolidation techniques  that minimize disturbance below ground
         should be used (e.g., vibroflotation which  involves  installation of
         "stone columns"  rather  than piles).
     •    A suitable environment  should be provided for sustained growth of
         trees.   Root penetration  into the original  ground can be avoided by
         local  mounding or raised  planting areas.
     Based on the findings from  the 1982 investigation,  the GLC concluded that
the presence of methane and combustible soils did not, pose major problems
overall, although combustible materials at the eastern end of the site might
require some precautions during site development to guard against combustion
and release of toxic gases.   Fires for destruction of rubbish or other
purposes must not be allowed on the site at any time.  In general, precautions
required to deal with other hazards at the site were believed to be sufficient
to protect against fire hazards.
     Sufficient remedial work was  carried out to insure that  contamination
from the gas works site did not pose a hazard to the surrounding areas.  The
most heavily contaminated surface soils were excavated and removed to a

                                      96

-------
licensed disposal  facility at Aylesbuiy, Buckinghamshire.  The cost of
transport and disposal of this materiel was £20  (about $30 U.S.) per cubic
meter  (based on 1983 exchange rates). | Clean fill was brought in to cover the
site to a depth of 1.1 meters  (3.6 fe«it) .
     Application has been made for a Derelict Land Grant to reclaim the site
to a greenfield site condition.  This
capacity up to 80 KN/m2.(3/4 ton/squar
will require bringing the ground bearing
e feet).   Vibroflotation is proposed as
the most appropriate form of ground inprovement.  This entails installation of
stone columns through the fill at about 2.5 meters on center.  Most of the
existing concrete cover slabs could remain undisturbed thus minimizing
exposure of workers to contaminated material.  Filled tanks and pits can also
be vibroflotated.

Site Reuse

     The Wandsworth Gas Works site is Dwned by the GLC,  which can control its
reuse.  The initial plans to develop tjhe site for housing were abandoned due
to the extensive contamination.  At the time of the Authors' site visit, the
major portion of the site adjoining the Thames River was fenced and vacant.
Some scrubby grass and moss were growing on some parts,  but the ground was
exposed over much of the site.
     The westernmost area of the former gas works land has been developed as
the Western Riverside Waste Transfer Station.   (The transfer station was under
construction at the time of the Authors' visit.)  The refuse station, designed
to handle some 600 tons of municipal waste daily, was scheduled to begin
operation in May 1985.  Municipal waste from the London Borough of Wandsworth
will be brought to the station where it will be compacted in preparation for
barging to Essex for final disposal.
     The southern area of the- site is used for truck parking.   A municipal
roadway (Estate Road) Is being constructed through the site by the London
Borough of Wandsworth.  A car park is planned next to the railway.  These
areas were exempt from the requirement
 for clean fill because the road base
plus the road construction asphalt will provide the necessary protective
cover.
     The GLC intends to develop portions of the remainder of the site as the
Wandsworth Enterprise park for light industry, preferably labor intensive
industries to provide jobs.  New buildings constructed on the site will be of
a light, flexible single story construction.  Concentrated loads should be
distributed through a semi-raft or spread footings to the vibroflotated
grounds  (Snow and Partners, 1984) .  This type of construction was recommended
                                      97

-------
to avoid cracking of brick or block work or internal walls and  to minimize
loads.  During the site development, special provisions will be encouraged for
the protection of workers on the site, (i.e., protective clothing and
showers).   In  the event that any unusual soil or objects  (e.g.,  highly colored
or malodorous  soil,  sealed drums or cylinders) are encountered,  testing will
be carried  out before further work in the vicinity is continued.

Criteria for Cleanup

     Findings  from the  chemical  investigation of the site were  compared with
tentative guidelines developed by AERE Harwell for "unacceptable" levels and
"undesirable"  levels for contaminants arising from gas works and similar sites
(Wilson and Stevens,  1981) .   These levels were recognized in 1981 as the
recommended guidelines.  The levels designated by Harwell as "undesirable"
were incorporated in the guidelines issued by the ICRCL in 1983 where they are
called "Trigger Concentrations"  for contaminants associated with former coal
carbonization  sites.

THAMESMEAD, LONDON
     The planned Community of  Thamesmead on the south bank of the Thames
River, is being developed by the Greater London Council  (GLC).   The
development area  is  located 16 kilometers  (10 miles) east of  central London in
the London Boroughs  of Greenwich and Bexley between Woolwich  and Erith.   The
unique 688 hectare  (1700 acres) site extends some 5.6 kilometers '(3.5 miles)
along the river.  Some 400  hectares (988 acres) of the planned  development is
on the site of the  former Royal Arsenal in Woolwich.  The portion of the site
apart from the old  Arsenal  land lies in the southern part of  the community and
has no contamination problem.   The Thamesmead site is show  in Figure 10.
     The development at  Thamesmead was  started in 1967 oil a site in  Bexley,
south of the Arsenal,  and it was not until 1975 that the extent of  the
contamination arising from activities in the Arsenal area was recognized as a
major issue in the  development.  Since that time, large-scale remediation
efforts to deal with the contaminated land and also with the  problems caused
by the high water table have been undertaken to render the  area suitable for
building.  The GLC's Assessment Panel on Contaminated Land, was established as
the working group to address land pollution problems at Thamesmead.   (See
Authors' note below.)
Authors' Note:  The information for this case study is drawn largely from GLC Inter-Departmental
Assessment Panel Reports, Laboratory Reports, and Development Briefs.  Much of the historical
information is from a paper by GLC Officer, Mr. George Lowe.  The Authors visited the Thamesmead
site in March 1985 accompanied by Mr. Lowe and Mr. Ray Carpenter of the GLC.

                                       98

-------
99

-------
     The Thamesmead area is composed mostly of drained marshland.  The  site is
a natural drainage basin, receiving water from nearby hills and discharging it
via tidal sluices into the Thames River.  The land has a high water table and
poor load-bearing capacity.  To prevent flooding, a riverside pumping system
has been devised, with connecting lakes and canals within the community.

Land Use History and Redevelopment Ob-jectives

     The process of reclaiming land from the Thames River marsh was begun by
Roman settlers and continued by Augustinian monks who established an abbey
south of the current Thamesmead site in the 12th century.  From about 1600,
the responsibility for maintaining the river wall and flood control was passed
to the  government.  The Woolwich Naval Dockyard was established on the Thames
River just upstream from the current Thamesmead site by Henry VIII, and the
area soon became active in military and industrial activity.  The first
manufacturing industry  in the areas was a brass foundry where cannons were
cast starting in 1716.  During the  18th century, convict  labor was used to
fill the swampy ground with mud and debris  from excavations at St. Katherine's
Dock near the Tower of  London!  By  the beginning of the  19th century, the area
was incorporated into the  "Royal Arsenal."  A variety of  structures were  built
and various operations  were carried out at  the Arsenal.   Facilities for the
making  and testing of guns as well  as transportation provisions,  including
roads and railways dotted  the site.  Docks  and piers were established on  the
Thames  River  for receiving coal and other  raw materials.   Some 30 moated
magazines, known as tumps, were built.  From  1850,  the Arsenal had  its  own
facilities for  gas production and  later steam and  electricity.   Industrial
wastes  from gas production and other Arsenal  activities  were used to  fill in
the marshland.
     Use of the Royal Arsenal for the manufacture of heavy weapons,
ammunition, and explosives reached a peak  during the  First World War, and
after the War the  activity at  the  Arsenal  declined.   During World War II  the
area was heavily bombed,  and  surplus explosives  were  burned on the site
following the war.  The area  gradually  deteriorated after World War II.   In
the  mid 1960's  the old Arsenal  site was purchased from the Ministry of  Defense
by the  GLC  for  residential development.  At that time,  the Arsenal site was
the  largest  single area of vacant  land  in  London (Lowe,  1984).
                                       100

-------
Nature and Extent of Contamination
     It is difficult to determine exac ;ly what activities were carried out at
various locations on the site during previous centuries  since the previous
land use was classified military information.  Almost all of the original
structures have long been demolished.
following activities:
 The site bears evidence of the
     Heavy machine shop and forging work,
     Non-ferrous metal foundries,
     Cadmium and other metal plating,
     Town gas manufacture,
     Development and testing of paints
     Manufacture of acetylene.
     Manufacture and testing of weapons and explosives,
     Destruction of surplus explosives]and incendiary devices,
     Storage of coal stocks on the surface, and
     Dumping of industrial and utilities wastes. (Lowe, 1984)
     Vast quantities of waste generated by industrial processes, manufacture
of town gas, and generation of electricity were left at various locations on
the old Arsenal site.  The wastes were
serve as cover for sensitive installations or used as foundations for
buildings, roads, and railways that ne
 sometimes formed into large mounds to
^worked the site.   It has been estimated
that as much as 1.5 million cubic meters of contaminated materials present on
the Thamesmead site would require dispbsal (Lowe, 1987, p. 479).
     The potential problems stemming from buried chemicals at Thamesmead
became evident in 1975 when a heavily contaminated area was excavated;
underground phenol tanks from the formpr gas works were penetrated, and a
chemical fire occurred.  After this, construction operations were suspended to
avoid further risks to contracts personnel.  These events made clear the
necessity for thorough site investigation and remedial action planning prior
to site development.
     Chemical contaminants of concern
t the site include heavy metals  (lead.
cadmium, mercury, antimony, arsenic, zinc, nickel, "and copper) ,- organics  (coal
tars, oils, phenols); elemental sulfur', sulfide, and sulfate; free and
complexed cyanides, combustible materials, and asbestos.  The analytical
determinations for samples from different sites vary based on the use history
and preliminary site investigations.
     Asbestos insulation was  found on the surface along the lines of a network
of overhead steam and hot water pipes from the two boiler plants  (Lowe, 1984).
These lines extended for several kilometers, and a detailed search for
asbestos 'residues was carried out.  Asbestos materials cleared from Thamesmead
sites are disposed in a licensed facility on site.
                                      101

-------
     Enormous quantities of coal were brought to the Arsenal for use in town
 gas production,  electricity and steam generation,  and  in foundry operations.
 Huge stocks of  coal were piled on the surface behind the old river  embankment.
 Over time,  large quantities of this coal sank below the surface under  its  own
 weight and remained in the ground after the main  stocks were removed.   In
 1976,  underground fires at two locations (apparently the result of  spontaneous
 combustion of the buried coal)  burned through the roots systems of  trees that
 had colonized the areas (Lowe,  1984).   Although remaining trees and flammable
'materials were  removed from the surface,  these  underground fires continued to
 burn through the coal over a  2-year period.
     Because the Thamesmead site  is largely reclaimed marshland, the presence
 of methane gas  from the breakdown of organic material  in river silt remains a
 concern,  particularly for  sites close to the river wall.

 Remediation Activities

     Reclamation measures  are  designed  to resolve  contamination problems by
 the simplest possible means.   These measures include the following  (Lowe,
 1984,  p.  563):
      "Overfilling with clean  imported material;
      "Excavation and removal  of contaminated soil  and replacement with clean
      imported fill where the  original ground level has  to be maintained;
      "The covering of sloping  surfaces  when the contaminated inner  cores of
     raised mounds are exposed or deep  cuts are formed  for canal construction
     through raised areas;
      "Special arrangements for prevention of direct contact and erosion when
     excavations near lakes bring subsurface contamination into conflict with
     open water;
      "Change of  land use."
     Sand dredged from the North Sea has  been used extensively as fill
 material  in the Western Area  of Thamesmead. Because of the high water table
 and poor  load-bearing capacity at Thamesmead, all construction work must be
 piled or  preloaded  (surcharged) to achieve  adequate consolidation.   Prior  to
 development of  any areas affected by underground  fires, the sites will be
 excavated down  to natural  clay and filled with  clean granular  material (Lowe,
 1984).
     A licensed  disposal facility was created sufficient for 350,000 cubic
 meters (457,765 cubic yards).  This was completely filled in 1985.   A second
 disposal  facility is now in use.
                                      102

-------
     One area designated  for residential development has been  found  to have
 methane at significant levels.   Structures built on such sites must  be
 designed so as  to avoid accumulation of ,the gas to an  explosive level.   During
 the course of remedial works and site
development at Thamesmead, the discovery
 of any unusual.objects or materials should be reported to the GLC Scientific
 Advisor for the site.
    • When the  geographical extent of the ground pollution problem at
 Thamesmead  was recognized,  it became clear" that  the cost and the impact on the
 environment of exporting the contaminated material to out-county disposal
 facilities  would be unacceptable (Lowe,  1987).   The only viable alternative
 was to provide for disposal  within  the confines  of Thamesmead.  The necessary
 disposal area  was developed  within  the space created by construction of a new
 river  wall.  (See discussion of Thamesmead Site  4J/4K.)
 Land Reuse
     For purposes of development, the
 GLC into  a number of  areas,  each with
Thamesmead area has been divided by the
its own characteristics and planned use.
 The GLC performs site investigations to determine the extent of contamination
 problems (if any)  at each site.   Findings of the site investigation are then
 reviewed by the GLC Inter-Departmental Assessment Panel  who make
 recommendations regarding remediation
and site preparation measures necessary
 to make the site ready for development.   A "Development Brief"  outlining the
•GLC's  use plan for the site is then prepared by the GLC Housing Department and
 issued to prospective developers for each site.  The Development Brief states
 the GLC's design and development requirements noting that,  "It  is intended
 that this design advice should be sufficiently flexible to  allow the developer
 and architect the opportunity to use their specialized abilities to create a
 scheme which successfully integrates environmental,  financial and market
 criteria" (GLC,  1983b; GLC,  1984c).
     About 40 percent of the site had
been developed by 1985.  When complete,
 Thamesmead is  planned to accommodate approximately 40,000  people,  providing
 homes,  local employment on purpose bu;
 shops  and a town center with shopping
 of the entire community development  is  projected to be  in the 1990's.
It industrial estates, neighborhood
and recreational facilities.  Completion
                                      L03

-------
     Four of the Thamesmead areas for which assessments have been completed
are discussed in the Sections 3.5.6 through 3.5.9.  These areas are treated as
independent land reuse case studies to highlight the significant development
issues for each site.  These cases serve to illustrate the GLC's approach for
preparing individual areas of Thamesmead for development, or, in one case, the
decision not to develop or in any way disturb the site because of in-ground
contamination.

Criteria for Cleanup

     The contamination at each Thamesmead area is evaluated within the context
of the intended site development.  Recommendations for remedial measures are
proposed based on projected long-term hazards to site users.  Long-term
occupants of houses with vegetable gardens are considered to be the group of
users at highest potential risk.  Stringent remedial action planning is
carried out for sites to be used for housing with gardens.  Schools are also
considered as a sensitive land use.  Since buildings and paved surfaces
provide a barrier to exposure to land pollution, remedial measures at school
sites are focused mainly on landscaped areas.
     Samples from areas believed to contain combustible materials are tested
to determine their calorific value.  For guidance purposes, materials with
calorific values of 1700 calories  (about 7,100 J) per gram are considered to
have a potential for spontaneous combustion (Lowe, 1984, p. 562).

Thamesmead Area 4A

     Thamesmead site 4A located in Thamesmead Central comprises approximately
10 hectares (24.7 acres).  The 4A site was divided into four areas, each with
a different use designation (Goaman, 1983b).  These areas are the Territorial
  i
Army Volunteer Reserve (TAVR)  site, Public Open Space, the Birchmere Lake 2
expansion areas, and the 4A Housing Area.  The area designated for housing was
formerly used for storage and handling of materials and was a major point of
intersection for railway traffic (GLC, 1983c).

Site 4A:  Nature and Extent of Contamination--
     The first site investigation involving Site 4A was carried out in 1977.
Samples were taken from 31 trial pits at depths of 0.12, 1.0, and 2.0 meters
(6 inches,  3.28 feet, and 6.56 feet, respectively).  Although a few random
areas were found to contain sulfide and cyanide near the surface, there was no
evidence of general disposal of gas works wastes (Goaman, 1983b).  Based on
                                      104

-------
the  findings  from the  site  investigatipns the northern  section of  the  site
used by the TAVR appeared to be  largelV undisturbed natural material and
substantially free  from contamination.
     The 1977 investigation revealed tiiat for a large portion of the site the
surface had been covered with  fill containing ash as a  major component
(Goaman, 1983b).  Heavy metal  contamination by antimony, arsenic,  lead,
cadmium, copper, and  zinc was found at
area.  Additional testing.was carried
 or near the surface over most of the
out in 1983 to reexamine the high
antimony levels reported from the earlier investigation  (an analytical problem
was suspected).  The 1983 samples show
id antimony levels to be close to
typical values for natural soils..  A summary of the metals contamination
reported in the proposed housing area
     Arsenic—Three samples contained higher than 50 mg per kilogram air dried
sample  (50 ppm).  The highest arsenic
                                Almost
(Goaman,  1983b)  follows:
Level,  140 ppm,  was from a trial pit in
 all samples contained more than 10 ppm
the southern part of the site.
arsenic.
     Lead—Ten samples contained lead at higher than 1,000 ppm; four
additional samples contained lead above 500 ppm.  The highest  concentration,
7,100 ppm, was found in a sample taken from the area designated for Lake 2
expansion.  Almost all of the significant lead contamination was confined to
the top 0.15 meter (6.inches) of soil.
     Cadmium—The two highest cadmium levels reported were 30.2 and 15.2 ppm.
Twenty one samples, most from the top 0.15 meter  (6 inches), contained levels
above 3 ppm.
     Nickel—Twenty-four samples contained nickel at levels between 50 and 100
ppm, and three samples contained greatsr than 100 ppm.  The two highest
reported levels were 950 and 430 ppm.  Nickel contamination was found in
samples down to 2 meters (6.6 feet).
     Zinc—Seven samples contained higher than 1,000 ppm zinc.
                                                                The highest
reported level, 125,000 ppm was for a sample from 1.0 meter (3.3 feet) below'
the surface.  All other contaminated samples were from a depth of 0.15 meter
(6 inches).

Site 4A:  Remediation Activities--
     The GLC Inter-Departmental Assessment Panel (1983c)  recommended site
cleanup measures designed to deal with
Existing concrete foundations throughout the site were to be excavated and
removed by the GLC.  Areas to be used ::or private houses with gardens were
recommended to be covered to a depth of 0.6 meters (2 feet) with clean
 the heavy metal  contamination.
imported fill and clean topsoil.  This
                                      105
 recommendation did not apply, however,.

-------
to the TAVR area; only 0.15 meter (6 inches) of clean fill/topsoil was to be
required to cover this area.  Areas designated for amenity open spaces
required 0.3 meter (1 foot) of fill including topsoil.  After removal of the
existing substructures, the GLC would provide for the necessary cover except
for the 0.3 meter (1 foot) of topsoil.  Provision of the topsoil which forms
the cap for the contaminated areas would be the responsibility of the
contractor for the site development.
     For conservation areas,  the Assessment Panel recommended the addition of
0.3 meter  (1 foot) of clean fill and topsoil, with special care given to
preserve existing trees on the site.  Not less than 0.15 meter (6 inches) of
soil should be removed by hand tools from above and between the roots of trees
before the fill is added.  This technique allows the necessary thickness of
clean cover while maintaining the final level around tree trunks at only 0.15
meter (6 inches) above the original ground level  (GLC, 1983c).
     The site preparation required removal of extensive concrete foundations
and floor slabs from the buildings which once covered the site.  A concrete
lined drainage channel also had to be removed after a new culvert was
completed.  Surface water drainage from the site was allowed to be discharged
into the Birchmere Lake, but an oil interceptor was required to be provided
(GLC, 1983d, paragraph 4.6.2).

Site 4A:  Site Reuse—
     The first phase of residential development for the Area 4A is a 2.27
hectare  (5.6 acre site) to be called Birchdene 1  (Site 4A1).  This site has
ready access to major roads and partial frontage on Birchmere Lake 2.  In
October, the GLC Housing Department distributed the Development Brief for the
Birchdene 1 site. The GLC provided detailed guidelines to assure high quality
plans and structures as well as an appropriate relationship of the development
with the Lake.  Substantial effort was devoted to planning amenity spaces
including pedestrian and bicycle paths and  landscaped areas.  The development
should achieve an overall density of 173 to 210 habitable rooms per hectare
(70 to 85 habitable rooms per acre)  (guidelines set forth in the Greater
London Development Plan).  The GLC  (1983d)  further required the dwelling sizes
in Birchdene 1,to conform to the following guidelines:
     •    not more than 30 percent bedsits/1 bed flats,  and
     •    not less than 40 percent 3/4 bedroom houses.
     Besides the Birchdene 1 Site,  other sections of Site 4A were scheduled
for marketing  in July  1984  (Site 4A2) and November 1984  (Site 4A3).
                                      106

-------
 Area 5B
 in an east to west direction, roughly
 The 2--hectare (5 acres) site is slight
 It is only about 40 meters wide along
      Area 5B of Thamesmead (shown in Figure 11}  is a long narrow site running
following the line of the Thames River.
ly-greater than 1.5 kilometer in length.
most of its length.  The site is bounded
 on the north by the'River and on the east by a canal.  A belt of trees forms
 the southern boundary,  and a chainlink fence denotes the western boundary.
 The site was originally proposed for development as a housing area.
      Part of the  site includes  a former  river  wall.   Bank raising as  part  of
 the London  flood prevention scheme wasj later carried out to protect the site.
 The area behind the old river wall was used to dispose of rubble from bomb-
 damaged buildings during and after World War II.  Pulverized fuel ash,
 probably from a local power station,  industrial waste from the Arsenal,  and
 some organic waste were also disposed
in this area.  Between 1981 and 1983,
 land behind the bank of the River Thames.was raised by sandfilling.   Surcharge
 material  was left in place over the dumping area for some time.   This action
 served to consolidate the ground and mkde  possible a conventional sewage
 system-for the  site.
     The remains  of three, moated magazines have been  found on the  site.  These
 structures were probably constructed op  waste material from  the  gas  works  and
 foundry associated with the Royal  Arsenal.
 5B:  Nature and  Extent  of  the  Contamination—
     An extensive investigation of the
site was undertaken in 1981  (Chapman,
 1980).  Five surface  samples and  114  samples  from 27 trial pits were obtained.
 Calorific value  (to indicate combustibility)  was determined  for 74 of  the'
 samples.  In addition,  19 boreholes were drilled to depths of 9 to 13  meters
 (29 to 43 feet)  to test for the presence of methane.
     Contaminants found in the samples
from different depths included lead.
arsenic, antimony, cadmium, zinc, coppor, magnesium, sulfur and coal tar.   In
two pits, very high levels of lead, sulfate, elemental sulfur, and antimony
were found.  The very alkaline pH found in some pits was attributed to the
presence of lime.
     Caloric value results varied with
soil depth.  At 0.15 meters little
combustible material was found.  At 0.5 meters, increased combustibility was
noted, and coal-like substances were found.  Some samples at greater depth
showed 20 percent coal or coke.  It was concluded that overall combustibility
was low, but with isolated pockets of highly combustible material.
                                      107

-------
                                       (S
                                       0)
                                       •d
                                       (S
                                       Di
                                       C
                                       •H



                                       I
                                       ra
                                       Oi
                                       id
                                       •H
                                       O
                                       •rt

                                       fe
108

-------
      Methane was found to be present'in several areas.  Samples taken from
 boreholes close to the Thames River  slowed methane in percentage  levels.
      Based on the findings of the investigation, the site was divided into
 three areas.  Area I, the western-mostT part of  the site, showed lower levels  .
 of contamination, in general, although two surface samples contained high
 levels of heavy metals.  This contamination'was believed to be confined to the
 ash-like material comprising the surface layers.  Area II, which  lies to the
 east of Area I, includes some areas od very high contamination.   The samples
 showing higher calorific values and high methane levels were taken from this
 area.  Area III, east of Area Ii; comprises the remainder of the site.
 area showed no substantial contamination.
                                                                         This
 5B:   Remediation Activities—
      Remediation requirements vary  for
                                       the three areas due to the different
 levels of contamination.  For Area I,  clearance of the ash-like surface
 material was required,  followed by covlring with at least 0.3 meters (1 foot)
 of clean imported fill  and topsoil.  The high levels of contamination and
 methane in Area II led  to the conclusin that the area was unsuitable for
housing development.  it was recommended
least 0.5 meters (1.6 feet) of clean fill and top soil to make it suitable for
                       It was recommendd that the area be covered with at
 open  space.   Deep tree pits  would also
     Recommendations for Area III were
                                       be required.
                                       similar to those  for Area I.   Due to
 the presence  of potentially  corrosive  substances  in  the  soil,  the  use  of
 sulfate-resistant  cement  is  recommended by  the GLC.  A subsequent  report  (GLC,
 1983e) stated that all areas used  for  Aousing should be  capped with  1.0 meter
 (3.3 feet) of soil, and houses should  be constructed with means of excluding
methane gas.

5B:  Site Reuse—

     Thamesmead Area SB is scheduled for residential development.   It is the
first riverside area in Thamesmead to be developed.  Due to the poor bearing
capacity of the ground, piled.foundations will be required for all structures
built on the  site.  Neighboring sites are also scheduled for development as
housing.   The development brief for Site 5B was distributed to potential
deve'lopers in July 1984.
                                     109

-------
Thamesmead Area 8K:  Broadwater South

     Thamesmead Area 8K,  named Broadwater South,  located in the western part
of Thamesmead covers approximately 0.8 hectare (2 acres).  The larger
Broadwater Area which includes several other sites for development was the
location of the gas works for the Royal Arsenal and a main center of
industrial activity for the Arsenal.  Like much of the Thamesmead site, the
Broadwater South Area was reclaimed from river marsh.  Among the industries
that have occupied the site are the foundry, metal plating, the production of
paint, metal treatment, metal shop,. testing of firearms, and explosives
storage.

Area 8K:  Nature and Extent of Contamination—
     The Broadwater South site was first investigated in 1978 as part of the
larger Area  8 West and 8 South.  At that time, the area which 'had been  the
site of the  gas works was
              found to be so grossly contaminated that it was
 considered too dangerous for housing development.
     The 8K
site was retested separately in 1982 after in-ground structures
 and foundations were
         removed.  It was suggested that the excavation of the
 foundations resulted in mixing surface soils with cleaner soil  beneath the
 foundations,  thus lowering the pollutant levels.
     During the  1982  investigation, a  total  of  16 pits were dug, and 80 soil
 samples were obtained from various depths
 levels of copper, zinc, mercury,  lead, and
                              down
                               cadmium
to 3.0 meters (10 feet).  High
    were found.   The
 contaminants were found at all depths.  Combustibility was not indicated to
 pose a hazard at the site.

 Area 8K:  Remediation Activities—
      Following the 1978 investigation,  the Areas Broadwater South and West
 were overlaid with an interim capping of 0.2 meter (0.6 foot) of silty sand.
 Following the 1982 testing, it was determined that for a residential develop-
 ment, an additional 0.5 meter (1.6 feet) of clean fill and 0.15 meter (0.5-
 foot) of clean topsoil should be added to this sandy layer.
                                       110

-------
 Area 8K:  Site Reuse—

      Based on the findings of extensive contamination at the former gas works
 site, it was decided to leave this arek undeveloped for use as open space.  A
 nearby area which had initially been scheduled for open .space was instead
 developed as housing,  thus allowing ths originally intended density of
 development over the combined sites.

 Thamesmead Site 4J/4K

      Thamesmead Area 4J/4K is an  area of land  formed  by  the  construction of a
 new river wall and used as a landfill  for the  contaminated soil and other
 excavated material from other areas of  the Thamesmead development.   It is the
 first site at Thamesmead "established as a licensed disposal facility with the
 deliberate intention of finally rec.laijiing the land for  housing purposes"
 (GLC,  1982,  p.. 1) .  The area was  filled over a 3-year period with about
 350,000  cubic meters (475,765 cubic yards)  of  material—some clean,  and some
 contaminated.

 Area 4J/4K:   Nature and Extent of Contamination—
     The conditions  of the disposal  license developed special operational
 control  of  the  facility.  Material  for
 that had been  subject  to  full  investige.tion.
 subject to contaminant limits  specified  in  the  license.
                                       disposal was only accepted from sites
                                              All materials received were
                                                         Table 7 shows the
contaminant limits determined from samples taken after the facility was
filled.
     The testing procedures used at the
 (GLC, 1982}.  A total of 25 trial pits
 surface to a depth of 6 meters  (20 feet
 0.15 meter to contain copper, arsenic,
 (1.6 feet), eight samples showed copper
                                        site are summarized in a 1982 report
                                       were dug.  Samples were' taken from the
                                       ).   Analyses showed five samples from
                                       cyanide,  and coal tar.  At 0.5 meters
                                        and antimony contamination.
     Another condition imposed by the disposal license addressed consolidation
during filling.  Material was required
                                       to be spread,  levelled,  and compacted
in layers of 225 to 300 mm  (9 to 12 indhes).  This meant that a' typical
vehicle load of 20 cubic meters would te spread over an area of at least 80
square meters  (Lowe, 1987).
     Methane testing was judged to be o
silt at the bottom of the fill.  This material was known to contain organic
substances which could produce methane.
depth of 8 to 12 meters (26 to 39 feet)
                                      11
                                       : potential concern because of river
                                         Eight  boreholes  were drilled to a
                                          Concentrations  of methane were found

-------
         TABLE 7.  LICENSE LIMITS AND MEAN CONTAMINANT LEVELS FOUND
                     AFTER DISPOSAL FACILITY WAS  FILLED*
Contaminant
     License  Limit
     mg/Kg dry soil
(except toluene extract)
                                                       Mean Concentration
                                                        mg/Kg dry soil
                                                    (except toluene extract)
Cadmium
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
Cyanide
Toluene Extract
Sulphide
Thiocyanate
Ferri-Ferro Cyanide
Arsenic
              20
            1500
              10
            1000
            2000
            2000
             100
              1%
             250
             200
            2000
             150
  1.1
532.2
  1.5
 85.7
877.8
870.7
  3.0
0.24%
  2.6
 50.0
100.0
 20.3
* Source:  Lowe,  1987, p.  481
                                      112

-------
 not to exceed 6 percent, and concentre.tions generally increased with depth.
 Some of the borehole test results indicated the methane was produced in the
 strata of peat below the landfill.  Itj other locations,  the maximum methane
 concentrations were found in the upper layer of the landfill, indicating the
 presence of decaying organic material

 Area 4J/4K: 'Remediation Activities—
within the fill material.
      During  the  construction  of  the  laidfill,  special  designs were  used to
 control the  spread of the contaminants from the waste  fill.   The disposal
 facility design is shown in Figure 12.  A metal curtain of sheet piling was
 installed between the site and the rivUr which prevents lateral migration of
 the waste material.   The steel sheet piling plus reinforced  concrete structure
 of the river wall extended down to the natural hand chalk base.
      Due  to  the  levels of  contamination,  several remedial measures  were pro-
 posed for the 4J/4K  Site.   After consolidation and removal of the surcharge
 materials, the site  should be covered vith 0.5 meters  (1.6 feet)  of clean
 imported fill and topsoil. Surplus  exbavated  material from  construction  on
 the site will be removed to an approved disposal site  within the  Thamesmead
 development  area.  Drainage and  servics trenches will  also be filled with
 clean material.
     Due to the presence of methane at
the site, special precautions will be
taken  in construction of housing.  Serjrice entries for gas, electricity,
phone, and other utilities will be indirect; separate ventilated service cup-
boards will be built.  In addition, ground floor slab concrete should be of a
mixture that-will not crack readily.
     After the site was completely filled,  it was covered with soil and seeded
to provide a temporary surface.  The site was later surcharged (i.e.,
temporarily covered with a large amount of soil and rock to accelerate
consolidation).
Area 4J/4K:  Site Reuse —
     The site will eventually be redeveloped
layout of housing is decided, the site
There will be regular monitoring over a
completed (Lowe, 1987).
      for housing.   When the final
will be subject to reinvestigation.
 period of five years after building is
                                     113

-------
uJO
                   s,

                            O
                            W
                             CO
                             C/3
                                                                              iS
                                                                              4J
                                                                              id

                                                                              g.
                                                                              •H
                                                                              CO    	
                                                                              •S    5
                                                                               C.
                                                                              •O
                                                                               en
                                                                               O)
                                                                              Q
                                                                               Dl
                                      114

-------
 Atkins,  W. S., 1984.  Redevelopment of
 —, M J T»T_ -~ L Xt1_	•___•! -~     . *   ..     __ _  —
 for Corby District Council prepared by
 1984).                                 ^
                                    REFERENCES
                                         Corby Steelworks—Willowbrook Central
       -       •.     --	£....—..— ^o. _v^j.^jf KSI-I=>=J.W<_>J.js.o—wj.J.XUWDJTOOK  uencraj.
 and West Chemical  Investigation,  Volume 2:   Trial Pit Logs and Data.  A Report
 rot- PovHw n-i ai--i--; ,-.*- /-t™ ,„„ j i	j ?	»,  _  .. , .      _ 3                i\>=i«-M. i.
                                         W. S. Atkins & 'Partners.  (September
 Barry,  D. L., 1984.  Redevelopment  of  Corby Steelworks—Willowbrook Central
 and West Chemical Investigation, Volume  1:   Report.  A Report for Corby
 District Council prepared by W. S.  Atkins  & Partners. (September 1984) .

 Beckett,  M.  J.,  1983.  "A Systematic Approach to the Redevelopment of
 Contaminated Land."  In:  Proceedings  Reclamation 1983 Conference, Grays,
 Essex,  April 26-29, 1983, pp. 555-563.                              ^ctys,,

 Beckett and  Simms,  1984.  "The Development  of Contaminated Land," Chemistry
 and Industry, 3  September, 1984, pp. 620-623.
Bevan,  D.  G.,  MP,  1983.  "Derelict Lane
      -   f        *  -- -- -   — '• — .•- v .*. .i. w ._ J_IW*.AX*^. .nv- 1_ J.-t*J£i*    J.1J. i   Jr X. OCJ
 Reclamation 1983 Conference, Grays,  EssW,  April 26-29,  1983.

 Birch,  A.  H.,  1980.  The British Syste
                                                       .         a  er
Student  Handbook No. 20,  George Allen and Unwin  (Publishers) ,  London.
 e^             Investi£Tations."  British  Standard Code of Practice.
 Standards Institution, BS 5930:1981. London.
                                          Act 1982."   In:  Proceedings
                                         of Government.   Minerva Series of
                                                                         British
BSI  1983.   "Draft Code of Practice foJ the Identification and Investigation
of Contaminated Land."   British Standar^ Code of Practice.   British Standards
Institution  (BSI)  Technical Committee EPC/47 .  Proposed  December 1983.
 *- mv,     '   :    '  1982a-   "Laboratory Report:  Investigation  of Contamination
at Thamesmead Broadwater  South."  Great'er London Council  -  Scientific Branch,
lift?       Safety  Sciences Division - Industrially Contaminated Land. 'March
                                      Report:  Investigation into Potential
                                          Greater London  Council - Scientific
                                         sion - Land  Pollution Group,  October
Carpenter, R. J.,  1982b.  "Laboratory .._
Contamination at Thamesmead Area 4J/K."
Branch, Health and Safety Sciences Divi
1982.
CDC, 1985.  Corby  District Council.  No
                                        tes on Corby— Brief History to Date-
   •  —7     	-r  — "•-'•-••--•->-•- v,^vjii.—LJ..  iiuL-ess uu v_oiroy—jsrier  History to Date-
Industrial Expansion in  Corby;  Reclamation of Iron and Steelmaking Sites in
Corby;  Enterprise  Zones  in Corby.   Provided by Community and  Technical
1985)"CeS Department'  Corby District Council during Authors' site visit (March



CorbyCDis?r?ctSCouncii;  £;*i,  9?^ ^ ^^ ChriStmaS  1984'   P-bli-h^ by
                                      115

-------
Chapman, T., 1980.  "Laboratory Report:  Investigation into Potential
Contamination at Thamesmead Area 5B."  Greater London Council - Scientific
Branch, Health and Safety Sciences Division - Land Pollution Group, July 8,
1980.

"£30M Complex...," 1984. '"£30M Complex Will Capture Shoppers and Tourists,"
Corby Words, No. 2, 1984, (p. 3).

Corby Facts, 1985.  Brochure prepared by Corby Industrial Development Centre,
Corby, Northamptonshire  (January 1985).

Corby Works, 1985.  Brochure prepared by Corby Industrial Development Centre,
Corby, Northamptonshire  (January 1985).

Crowhurst, D., and P. F. Beever, 1987.  "Fire and Explosion Hazards Associated
with the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land."  Information Paper, Building
Research Establishment,  Fire Research Station Borehamwood, Hertfordshire,
England.

DOE, 1981.   "Special Wastes:  A Technical Memorandum Providing Guidance on
Their Definition," Waste Management  Paper No 23., Department of the
Environment  (DOE).  HMSO, London  (220 pages).

DOE/WO, 1987.   "Development of Contaminated Land".  Joint Circular from the
Department of the Environment, 2 Marsham Street, London SW1P 3EB, and Welsh
Office, Cathays  Park, Cardiff CF1  3NQ.  Circular 21/87  (DOE); Circular 22/87
 (WO)./  "Environment...," 1985.  Corbv Words, No. 1, 1985.  Published by Penman
and Partners Limited on  behalf of  Corby Industrial Development Centre  (p.  4) .

GLC, 1981.  Greater London Council Investigation of Derelict Land.  Report of
the Inter-Departmental Assessment  Panel on Land at:  Thamesmead Site 5B,  Site
Code TM/5B.  February 1981.

GLC, 1982a.  Greater London Council  Investigation of Derelict  Industrial  Land.
Report  of the Inter-Departmental Assessment  Panel on Land at:  Thamesmead Area
8F, Broadwater  south  (TM/8S).  June  30, 1982.

GLC, 1982b.  Greater London Council  Investigation of Derelict  Industrial  Land.
Report  of the Inter-Departmental Assessment  Panel on Land at:  Thamesmead Area
 4J/4K,  Site Code 157/TM4. November 16,  1982.

GLC,  1983a.  Greater London Council  Investigation of Derelict  Land.  Report  of
 the  Inter-Departmental  Assessment  Panel on Land at Wandsworth  Gas Works,  Site
 Code  109/WAN.   February 16,  1983.

GLC,  1983b.  "Development Brief,  Housing 8K."   Prepared by Greater London
 Council Housing Department  to assist developers  in preparing schemes  for a
 residential development on  Site 8K.   August,  1983.

 GLC,  1983c.  Greater London Council Investigation of Derelict  Land.   Report  of
 the  Inter-Departmental  Assessment Panel on  Land  at Thamesmead  Site 4A,  Site
 Code  138/TM4.   October  18,  1983.

 GLC,  1983d. "Development Brief,  Birchdene No.  1."   Prepared by Greater London
 Council Housing Department  to assist developers  in preparing schemes for a
 residential development en  site 4A1 (Birchdene),  October 1983.

 GLC,  1983e.  Greater London Council Investigation of  Derelict  Land.   Report of
 the  Inter-Departmental  Assessment Panel on  Land at  Thamesmead Site 5B,  Site
 Code 144/TM5.   December 1983.
                                       116

-------
  GLC,  1984a.   Greater London Council Investigation of Derelict Land.   Report of
  the  Inter-Departmental Assessment Panel on Land at Thamesmead Site 5B,  Site
  Code 144/TM5.   May 18,  1984.
 GLC,  1984b.   "Contaminated {Land:   Evidence to Royal Commission on
 Environmental  Pollution."  GLC Scientific Services  Branch,  Land Pollution
 Group, June  8,  1984.

 GLC,  1984c.   "Development  Brief,  Housing 5B."   Prepared by  Greater London
 Council Housing Department to  assist  developers in.preparing schemes for a
 residential  development  on Site 5B.   July 1984.

 GLC,  1984d.   "Derelict,  Damaged and Vacant Land."   Chapter  7D in The Greater
 London Development  Plan  (As  Proposed  to  be altered  by  the Greater London
 Council).  Approved by the Planning committee  9  July 1984 and amended by the
 Council 25 September  1984. pp., 115- 118.

 Goaman, H. P.,  1983a.  "Laboratory Report:   Investigation into Potential
 Contamination  at Wandsworth  Gas Works-[-1982  Survey."   Greater London Council -
 Scientific Branch,  Health  and  Safety  Sciences  Division - Land Pollution  Group,
 February 1983.

 Goaman, H. F.,  1983b.  "Laboratory Report:   Investigation into Potential
 Contamination  at Thamesmead  Area  4A."  Greater London  Council - Scientific
 Branch, Health and  Safety  Sciences Division  -  Land  Pollution Group,  September
 30, 1983.
 Haiste International Limited, 1984.
 Towns, Willow Brook Central and West,
eport for the Commission for the New
Detail Study, Appendix IV:  Chemical
 Report by Bostock Hill and Rigby Limited.  February 1984.

 "The Hazards of Contaminated Land," Ccnference, London, May 15, 1981.
 Published by the Geological Society.
 Keeps, K. D.,  1982.  "The Reclamation
of a Disused Sewage Works," Public
 Land (ICRCL), "Progress Report of the
 A3.24, Department of the Environment,
 SW1P SPY.
 Health Engineer, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 213-214 and 218.

 ICRCL, 1979.  Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Contaminated
Interdepartmental Committee on
 Redevelopment of Contaminated Land, 1979," ICRCL 19/79, CDEP/198/138, October

 1979.  Available from Central Directorate on Environmental Pollution, Room
Romney House,  43 Marsham Street, London
 ICRCL, 1983a.  Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of
 Contaminated Land (ICRCL), "Guidance oh the Assessment and Redevelopment of
 Contaminated Land,"  ICRCL 59/83, 1st Edition, May 1983.  (Replaces ICRCL 3/78,
 16/78, 38/80, and 47/81.)  Available fjrom Central Directorate on Environmental
"Pollution,  Room A3.24, Department of the Environment, Romney House, 43 Marsham
 Street,  London SW1P SPY.     •           '                "

 ICRCL, 1983b.  Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of
 Contaminated Land (ICRCL), "Notes on strap Yards and Similar Sites," ICRCL
 42/80, 2nd Edition,  October 1983.  Available from Central Directorate on
 Environmental Pollution, Room A3.24, Department of the Environment, Romney
 House, 43 Marsham Street, London SW1P SPY.
 ICRCL,  1983c.   Interdepartmental Commi,
 Contaminated Land (ICRCL),  "Notes on t'.
:tee on the Redevelopment of
   Redevelopment  of Gas Works Sites,"
                                      117

-------
ICRCL 18/79, 4th Edition, November 1983.  Available from Central Directorate
on Environmental Pollution, Room A3.24, Department of the Environment, Romney
House, 43 Marsham Street, London SW1P SPY.

ICRCL, 1983d.  Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of
Contaminated Land (ICRCL), "Notes on Sewage Works and Farms," ICRCL 23/79, 2nd
Edition, November 1983.  Available from Central Directorate on Environmental
Pollution, Room A3.24, Department of the Environment, Romney House, 43 Marsham
Street, London SW1P SPY.

ICRCL, 1983e.  Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of
Contaminated Land (ICRCL), "Notes on the Redevelopment of Landfill Sites,"
ICRCL 17/78, 5th Edition, December 1983.  Available from Central Directorate
on Environmental Pollution, Room A3.24, Department of the Environment, Romney
House, 43 Marsham Street, London SW1P SPY.

ICRCL, 1984.  Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Contaminated
Land  (ICRCL), "Notes on  the Fire Hazards of Contaminated Land," ICRCL 61/84,
1st Edition, March 1984.  Available from Central Directorate on Environmental
Pollution, Room A3.24, Department of the Environment, Romney House, 43 Marsham
Street, London SW1P SPY.

ICRCL, 1987.  Interdepartmental Committee on the Redevelopment of Contaminated
Land  (ICRCL), "Guidance  on the Assessment and Redevelopment of Contaminated
Land," ICRCL 59/83 2nd Edition, July 1987.   (Replaces ICRCL 3/78, 16/78,
38/80, and 47/81.)  CDEP/EPTS, Department of the Environment, Romney House, 43
Marsham Street, London SW1P SPY.

Kelly, R. T., 1979.   "Site Investigation and Materials Problems."  Presented
at  "Reclamation of Contaminated Land,"  Conference at Eastbourne, October 22-
25, 1979.  Proceedings published by Society of  Chemical  Industry, London,
1980, pp. B7/1-15.

Khan, A.  Q., and G. A. Thomas, 1980.   "Pseudo Love Canal of United Kingdom and
Rehabilitation of a Hazardous Chemical  Dump:  Problems of Uncontrolled
Disposal  Sites."  In:  Proceedings HMCRI, 1980.

Lord, D.  W., 1983.   "The Proposed British Standard Code  of  Practice  for  the
Identification and  Investigation of Contaminated Land."  In:   Proceedings
Reclamation  1983 Conference,  Grays, Essex, April 26-29,  1983,  pp.  176-184.

Lowe, G.  W., 1979.   "GLC Development at Thamesmead."  Presented at
 "Reclamation of Contaminated  Land," Conference  at Eastbourne,  October 22-25,
1979.   Proceedings published  by Society of Chemical  Industry,  London, 1980,
pp. B2/1-14.

Lowe, G.  W., 1984.   "Investigation  of  Land at Thamesmead and Assessment  of
Remedial  Measures  to  Bring Contaminated sites  Into Beneficial Use."   In:
Proceedings  5th National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites, Washington, D.C., November 7-9,  1984, pp.  560-564.

Lowe,  G.  W.,  1987.   "The Use  of  Contaminated Material  for  the Creation  of New
Housing Land at Thamesmead,  London."   In:   Proceedings  Second International
Converence  on New Frontiers  for  Hazardous Waste Management,  Pittsburgh,  PA,
September 27-30,  1987, pp.  477-484.

Netherton,  D. W.  and B.  I. Tollin,  1980.   "Reclamation  of  the Becton Alps and
Adjacent Areas,"   Public Health Engineer, Vol.  10, No.  4,  pp. 202-211.
                                       118

-------
Norwest Hoist,  1982.,  "Ground Investigation:   Corby Steelworks."
Engineering report  to  Corby  District  Council November 1982.
                                                    Soil
Parker, A., K. W.  Pearce,  S.  F.  Penned,  and M.  S. Wright,  1984.   "The
Decontamination of a  Disused  Gas Works Site," Journal  of Hazardous  Materials,
Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, Vol. 9  (1984)  pp.  347-354.
 "Rebuilding Our Town,"  1984.   Corby  Civic News,  Christmas  1984.
 Corby District Council, pp.  1-2.
                                                   Published by
 "Reclamation of Contaminated Land,"  1979.  Conference  at  Eastbourne,  October
22-25,  1979.
1980.
Proceedings published by Society of Chemical Industry, London,
 "Reclamation and Development of Contaminated Land,"  1980.  Conference  at
 London, December 8-9,  1980.  Oyez,  198JO.

 Red Tape to Finishing Tape,"  1984.  Corby Words, No.  1,  1984, published  by
Penman and Partners Limited on behalf
(p.
                        of Corby Industrial Development Centre
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution,  1984.   "Tackling  Pollution:
Experience and Prospects," Tenth Report.  HMSO, London.

Smith, M. A., 1979.   "Standards for the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land."
Presented at  "Reclamation of Contaminated Land," Conference at Eastbourne,
October 22^25, 1979.  Proceedings published by  Society of Chemical  Industry,
London, 1980.

Smith, M. A., 1980a.  "Contaminated LaLd in Cities," Paper presented to the
British Association for the Advancemenjt of Science, Annual Meeting, Salford,
September 1-5, 1980.

Smith, M. A., 1980b.  "The Appraisal of Contaminated Land," Paper presented at
the Annual Congress Environmental Health Officers Association  (EHOA),
Bournemouth,  1980.  In Proceedings EHOA, London, pp. 53-56.

Smith, M. A., 1982.   "Contamination and the Built Environment." Paper
presented at  PTRC Summer Meeting on "Policy Analysis for Housing and
Planning," held at University of Warwick, Coventry, July, 1982.

Smith, M. A., 1983.   "Technical Problems Associated With the Development of
Derelict and Former Industrial Land."
Conference, Grays, Essex, April 26-29,
                         In:   Proceedings Reclamation 1983
                         1983,  pp.  113-123.
Smith, M. A., and J. A. Charles.  "Technical Problems Associated with the
Development of Derelict and Former Industrial Land," In:  Proceedings
International Land Reclamation Conference, 1983  (Industrial Seminars,
Tunbridge Wells, 1983, pp. 113-123.
Snow, Sir Frederick and Partners, 1985
Proposal by the Carroll Group of Companies, Wandsworth Enterprise Park.
Wilson, C. W. and E. T. Smith, 1980.
Perspective of the Problem in the U.K.

Wilson, D. C., and B. C. Hudson, 1979.
Land."  Presented at "Reclamation of Contaminated Land," Conference,
Eastbourne, October 22-25, 1979.
Industry, London, 1980.
                    Proc
                           "Land Reclamation Cost Report.
                        'Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites—A
                        1   In:   Proceedings HMCRI 1980.

                          "Spent Oxide on Former Gas Works
sedings  published by Society of Chemical
                                       19

-------
Wilson, D. C. and C. Stevens, 1981.  "Problems Arising From the Redevelopment
of Gas Works and Similar Sites."  AERE Report R-10366, 1981.  Available from
Central Directorate on Environmental Pollution, Room A3.24, Department of the
Environment, Romney House, 43 Marsham Street, London SW1P 3PY.
                                      120

-------
                                WALES,
united with England,  and the  two coun
                                       SECTION  4
                                          ITED  KINGDOM
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
       The Principality of Wales,  in southwest Great Britain,  is politically
                                          :ries have shared common systems  of law]
                                          Wales (shown in Figure 13) is  surrounded
                                                                                    II
and  government for nearly 450 years.
on three sides by sea;  the western border  it shares  with England. The
legislative Acts of Parliament  in effect in England  also apply to Wales.
       The eight counties of Wales comprise some 8,018 square  miles  (somewhat
larger than the state of New Jersey) with  a population just under 3 million
people.   Large areas of central Wales are  sparsely populated,  while the sout
is densely populated by comparison.  Though part of  the United Kingdom—
together with  England,  Scotland,  and Northern Ireland—Wales  (Cymru, in the
Welsh)  has its own rich history and unique culture and language.
       Wales has long been recognized for its abundant natural resources.  The
great  coal fields, especially the South Wales Coalfield,  have brought
notoriety to the area.   For,many  years industrialization in Europe was fed
coal  and metals .from Wales, and there
consequences .
during the  18th,  19th,  and early 20th
                                          was  little regard for  the environmental
                                                                                     I
                 Mining  of coal and ores and production of metals and  chemical's
                                                                                     I
                                          centuries were  carried  out on a
tremendous scale in some areas  and accompanied by  indiscriminant dumping of
Authors' Note:  Much of  the information in thid section was obtained during the Authors' visit_co
Wales  in March  1985.  We are grateful to the Wejlsh Office in Cardiff and especially to Mr. Ron"
Page,who spent  considerable time and effort to make our visit to Wales both educational and    t
enjoyable.  We  appreciate the welcome by Mr. L. E. Taylor, who heads the Waste and EnvironmentalL
Protection Division of the Welsh Office,  and his comments on the Division's research program.
Mr.  Gwyn Griffiths and Mr_. Victor Skyrme of the Welsh Development Agency, Pontypridd, also
provided valuable insights and accompanied us cjn several site visits in Mid Glamorgan.
Accompanying us on • site  visits in the Lower Swansea Valley were Dr. Michael Bridges of the
University College of Swansea;  Mr. Haden Jones,
                                          City Engineer's Office,  Swansea; and Mr. Page of
the Welsh Office.  Each of our hosts had been involved with different aspects of the reclamations
and redevelopment of the Valley since the initial project  investigations in 1961.  Their      :
perspectives into the progress,  the problems, and the issues relating to the revitalization of
the Valley were extremely helpful.                                 •
In addition to seeing several contaminated sites and the reclaimed and redeveloped areas that a :e
most pertinent to this document, we saw some ofl the beautiful valleys and coastal areas for whlbh
Wales is famous.  To witness the contrast between the natural landscape and the extensive damag'l
brought about by irresponsible environmental practices of  earlier years made the reclamation
efforts now underway in Wales and all the more
                                          impressive.
                                          121

-------

                 /fofrfe/MrfTSjgjgfe

                     AberifrltsV^
                     Ctynnog-fawj/
                     w^rar^iSKE

*l%o^4>^
                                    o
                    ISTOL  CHANNEL
Figure 13.  Map of Wales  (courtesy of the National Geographic Society)
                              122

-------
 spoils.   Much of Wales  consists  of upland areas  formed by ancient igneous  and
 metamorphic  rocks.   The granite  and slate deposits  have been quarried
 extensively  in Northwest Wales,  leaving vast  heaps  of  waste  and water-filled
 craters.
      Along  with some of the  finest natural scenery in the world—superb
 countryside, beautiful mountains  and
 Wales has  large  areas of  derelict and
pressure  to  develop  any unused  sites.
valleys, glorious beaches and coastline—
 contaminated land.  Because so little
 land  in Wales  is  suitable  for  development  (due  to  the  steep  slopes),  there  is
 particularly near or in towns, and to
reclaim derelict  land.  The  narrow mining valleys  characteristic  of many parts
of Wales present  unusual difficulties,  for  the  level ground  is primarily
occupied by  surface works and  the  mining wastes are tipped on the valley
sides.  The  accumulated wastes from mining, smelting, and other industrial
activities have left a sad legacy  of  scarred valley hillsides and country
moorlands.   Polluted waterways also remain  as a result of the old mining
practices that continued over  many centuries and into modern times.
      In Wales the potential danger of  spoiling land was brought  to everyone's
attention in October 1966 when a mountainside tip  of colliery waste was made
unstable by heavy rains.  Millions of
 tons of coal waste avalanched down the
mountain to the village of Aberfan, engulfing a school and several homes.  One
hundred forty four people were killedt including 116 children.  Since the
Aberfan disaster, there has been a determined and ambitious drive in Wales to
alleviate, dangerous dereliction and to restore contaminated land to productive
and beneficial use.
Industrialization in Wales
      Industrialization in Wales has
seen strongly influenced by the country's
natural resources, in particular its  :oal fields, ore deposits, rivers and
ports.  -The presence today of large dferelict and contaminated areas represent
the final stage in the exploitation of these resources.
      Because of the high quality of  ;he coal and its proximity to tidal
waters, the South Wales Coalfield was
 the  chief  coal-exporting  region of the
world from about 1881.  After World War II, the demand for Welsh coal
decreased greatly, both at home and abroad.  South Wales continued, however,
for several years to be the premier coal exporting area in the United Kingdom.
The South Wales Coalfield is marked by many north-south orientated rivers
which have cut deep valleys through the region.  Ironstone and limestone occur
                                      123

-------
along with the coal at the heads of these river valleys.  Coal mining and
ironmaking activity have dominated these valleys for many years.  Important
industrial centers developed around the major ports from which the coal was
shipped.
      The North Wales Coalfield influenced industrial development in the
northeast.  The occurrence of coal, ironstone, and limestone in Northeast
Wales, gave rise to an important ironmaking industry.  Coal was also processed
to recover oils, tar, ammonia, and various other chemical products.
      Major deposits of lead, zinc, and copper in central and northeast Wales
have been mined extensively.  The large quantities of fuel necessary, for
smelting usually required transporting the ores to the coal fields.  In the
northeast the smelting was done locally as coal supplies were readily
available.  Ores from central Wales were generally shipped to the South Wales
smelters which used coal from the South Wales Coalfield.

Government Response to Dereliction

      Before 1966, Government involvement in land'reclamation in Wales was
very limited.  Between 1960 and 1966, the.area reclaimed with government aid
was only 40 hectares  (99 acres).  Since the Aberfan disaster, Government
assistance has aided local authorities in hundreds of reclamation projects.
Today, two Central Government bodies, the Welsh Office and the Welsh
Development Agency, are responsible for programs to facilitate reclamation and
redevelopment of derelict land.  Within a month of the Aberfan disaster the
government set up a special unit within the Welsh Office to lead, encourage,
and coordinate a program of land reclamation.  By 1976, government assistance
for the rehabilitation of derelict land totaled more than £20 million  (about
$48 million U.S.), and more than 3,100 hectares  (7,657 acres) of derelict land
had been rehabilitated.  Beginning in 1976, the programs involving reclamation
to upgrade and promote land reuse were transferred to a separate body, the
Welsh Development Agency.

Role of the Welsh Office—
      The Welsh Office, headquartered in Cardiff  is responsible for the
administration of programs in agriculture, education, and environmental
control.  The Welsh Office reviews project proposals submitted by Local
Authorities and makes recommendations for loans or grants from Central
Government.  The Water and Environmental Protection Division, comprising about
60 people, advises on various environmental matters including hazardous waste
sites.  This Division functions much like the Department of the Environment in
                                      124

-------
England, but on a more limited scale.
aimed at scoping, understanding, and
of contaminated land  (Page, 1984, pp.
  The Division also sponsors research
alleviating waste-related problems.  The
annual research budget for 1985 was approximately £120,000  (about $143,000).
Some of these research efforts that are particularly relevant to redevelopment
 594-7),  are described below.
      Blood Lead Levels in Halkyn Mountain Area—A study initiated in 1975
examined blood lead levels in women and children living in the Halkyn Mountain
area, a former metals mining region in East Wales.  The study revealed blood
lead levels 30 to 50 percent higher than levels in women and children living
in other parts of Wales.  As expected^, heavy metals levels, especially lead,
in Halkyn Mountain soils were found to be significantly higher than levels in
soils from West Wales.  Important lead intake routes were found to be through
eating locally-grown vegetables and through ingestion of lead-contaminated
dust from kitchen surfaces and, parti
cularly for children,  from soiled hands.
      Background Levels of Heavy Metals--In an effort to establish baseline
metals concentrations  (i.e., levels that would be considered normal) in
environmental media throughout the Principality, the Welsh Office has asked
the University college of Aberystwyth
grass, cereals, and vegetables for arsenic, cadmium, copper, mercury, lead,
and zinc.  It is intended that this,effort, initiated in 1983, will show the
the 19th century.  Thousands of tons
 to analyze samples of soils,  dusts.
distribution of these metals in soils
      New Uses for Slate Debris--Ther
heaps from the slate quarrying and cutting operations that were active during
 throughout Wales.
e are in some parts of Wales vast spoil
of slate were quarried out of the
mountainsides, and today the spoil heaps tower over the slate villages.
Because of the enormous volumes, this
potential danger should it become unstable.  A productive use for the material
is sought as this might encourage its
      Land Reclamation Schemes—A sti
 waste is unsightly and also poses a
 removal.  The objective of the effort
sponsored by the Welsh Office is to investigate slate as a raw material to
produce fiberglass.
dy sponsored in 1984 involves examining
the'cost-effectiveness and life expectancy of various reclamation systems.  In
this effort Liverpool University was asked to identify or develop models to
predict the optimum reclamation systep for contaminated sites.

Survey of Contaminated Land--
      In 1983 the Welsh Office and the Welsh Development Agency cosponsored a
project to design and develop a data
base to provide a comprehensive record of
sites in Wales that are believed to be contaminated.  The Environmental
Advisory Unit, Liverpool University, was contracted to develop the methodology
                                      125

-------
and to carry out the initial survey  (a one man-year effort).  This survey of
contaminated land is the first Regional Study of its kind in the United
Kingdom  (Page, 1984; Page et al., 1984).
      For the purposes of the survey, contaminated land is defined as "land
which contains material presenting a potential hazard to site users at present
or in the future, site developers, the environment, and building structures"
(WO/WDA  1984, p. 3).  A list of hazardous materials was adopted to use as a
basis for designating contaminated land.  This generalized checklist, given in
Table 8, is derived from the Special Waste Regulations, Control of Pollution
Act, 1980.  The list was applied as a qualitative tool; that is, if there is a
high probability that one or more listed materials are present at a subject
site as  a result of previous land use, then the site is designated as
contaminated and included in the survey.  Threshold concentrations that might
cause effects were not used since determining levels of pollutants at specific
sites was outside the scope of the project.
      Information for the survey was culled from available reference material
on industries in Wales (e.g., the iron and steel industry, the tinplate
industry, the gas production industry, metals mining), from maps, aerial
photographs, and local knowledge.  The Welsh Water authority and Health and
Safety Executive records of contaminating sites as well as government surveys
of industry in Wales were also utilized.  Emphasis in the survey was placed on
those sites of 0.5 hectares (1.2 acres) and larger.  Some smaller sites such
as former gas works sites and tar lagoons are also included because of their
potential for serious contamination.  Sites currently in beneficial use (i.e.,
active industry, housing districts) are excluded from the survey.
      The data base is designed to store information compiled for each site in
26 fields.  The first six fields include a code number (a unique identifier),
specific location data, the site name or owner, and current site use.  The
next 14  fields contain site specific information on topography, the most
likely contaminants, the period of use that potentially caused contamination,
an estimate of the amount of contaminated material, potential contaminant
toxicity, the proximity of the site to local housing,  and the current status
of the site.  Fields 21 through 24 provide an evaluation of the severity of
the contamination—a scale of the potential hazard, priority for attention,
the probability of contamination, and additional relevant information.  The
last two fields indicate the latest data update for the site and the primary
source for the site identification.  The data base is accessed through an IBM
compatible computer.  It may be querried using any field or combination of
fields.
                                      126

-------
        TABLE 8.   HAZARDOUS MATERIALS THAT MAY CAUSE SITE CONTAMINATION
Category

Metals and Compounds
Other Inorganics
Organic compounds
Special Chemicals
      Material

Antimony and .compounds
Arsenicl and compounds
Beryllium and compounds
Barium compounds
Cadmium and compounds
Copper compounds
Hexavalent chromium compounds
Lead ana compounds
Mercury and compounds
Nickel and compounds
Selenium and compounds
Silver compounds
Tellurium and compounds
Thallium and compounds
Vanadium compounds
Zinc anjd compounds
Metal hydrides and carbides

Acids and alkalis
Asbestos (all types)
Barium compounds
Boron compounds
Cyanides
Halogen-containing compounds
Sulfur-containing compounds
Metasilicates
Nitrates and nitrites
Phosphorus and compounds

Heterocyclic organic compounds with oxygen,
  nitrogen, or sulfur Hydrocarbons and oxygen,
  nitrogen, and sulfur derivatives
Organic halogen compounds, excluding inert
  polymers Peroxides, chlorates, perchlorates
  and azides.Tarry materials from refining and
  tar residues from distilling

Biocides and phytopharmaceuticals
Laboratory chemicals Pharmaceutical and
  veterinary compounds
Source:  Information  from "Survey  of
Office/Welsh Development Agency,  1984
Pollution Act,  1980.
      Contaminated Land in Wales."  Welsh
          List is modified from Control of
                                      127

-------
     More than 700 sites covering an area of 3,787 hectares (9,354 acres)  were
cataloged during the initial survey, and it is hoped that the survey- can be
updated annually.  The distribution  (based on initial survey results)  of con-
taminated land in Wales by county is shown in Figure 14.  The total number of
sites in each county is given along with the percentage of the total area of
the county that is categorized as contaminated.  The records of this survey
comprise a national register with many potential applications.  A potential
developer, for example, might consult the register to learn if a given
property is likely to contain hazardous materials that would drastically
affect the cost of redevelopment of the site.  Another potential user of the
survey is an individual considering purchase of a home or a lot for building;
the survey could be querried to determine if there are contaminated sites in
close proximity to the property under consideration.
     The survey data for each listed site include rankings of toxicity of con-
taminants present (high, medium, or low hazard to humans); a hazard factor
scored on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 denoting the most hazardous sites; and a
development factor (scored on a scale of 0 to 5, with 5 denoting the highest
priority) to indicate the relative priority for site remediation. These rank-
ings, although subjective in nature, are very useful in gaging the relative
importance of sites throughout the Principality or within a district.
     Table 9 indicates the number and types of sites in each County.  Some of
the trends observed in the initial survey data are noted below.  These conclu-
sions are excerpted from the final report from the survey dated March, 1984.
     "West Glamorgan has the largest area of (potentially contaminated) sites;
     this is largely composed of land in the Lower Swansea Valley.  Over half
     of the contaminated land in Mid Glamorgan occurs in the district  of
     Merthyr Tydfil....  (In)  South Glamorgan... the large areas of unused
     dockland present only slight hazards.   The areas and numbers of sites in
     Dyfed,  Gwynedd and Powys are largely due to metalliferous mine
     workings....  Clwyd has a mixture of contaminated land,  derived largely
     from mine sites... and a steel works....  Gwent has...sites in Newport
     and on the coalfield....
     "Clwyd has a disproportionately high number of... sites (with hazard and.
     development factors of 4 and 5) including disused chemical works, a
     steelworks,  lead mine tailings dams and gasworks....  Mid Glamorgan has a
     number of coke ovens and hazardous waste tips....
     "The large numbers of hazardous gasworks and coke ovens cover a
     relatively small area;  most do not merit reclamation on environmental
     grounds since,  when disused,  they do not create pollution and only
     present problems during redevelopment.  By contrast, many mine sites are
     significant hazards due to their potential for exporting contaminants and
     justify high priorities for treatment to prevent environmental damage.
                                      128

-------
        Coalfield

        Orefield

        Port
                                     Clwyd
                                     127 sites
                                     (0.21 percent]
                           Gwynedd
                           45 sites
                           (0.04 percent)
                                                Powys
                                                38 sites
                                                (0.03 percent)
                        Dyfed
                        117 sites
                        (0.09
                                                             Gwent
                                                             124 sites
                                                             (0.38 percent)
                                                                 ENGLAND
      West Glamorgan
      89 sites
      (1.27 percent)
                          125 sit
                          (0.62 percent)
                                                  South Glamorgan
                                                  39 sites
                                                  (0.50 percent)
Figure 14.
.Map showing counties
 and the percentage  of
 contaminated.


        (Source:  Data
of Wales,  the number of contaminated sites,
 total area in each county that is
                                 from WO/WA, 1984, p. 69)


                                 129

-------
          TABLE 9.   TYPES OF POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED SITES  BY COUNTY
Types of Sites
 Number of potentially contaminated sites

South       Mid         West        Dyfed
Gasworks/coke ovens
Metal mines
Waste tips
Iron/steel/tinplate
Chemical works
Transit areas
Smelters
Others
Total No. of sites
Total area (ha)
1
0
14
3
0
15
1
5
39
208
31
3
; se
21
2
2
1
9
125
636
4
0
48
14
5
5-
9
4
89
1032
6
6
35
19
4
3
1
3
117
526
Types of Sites
Number of potentially contaminated sites

Gwynedd     Clwyd   	Powys	Gwent
Gasworks/coke ovens
Metal mines
Waste tips
Iron/steel/tinplate
Chemical works
Transit areas
Smelters
Others
Total No. of sites
Total area (ha)
9
22
13
0
0
0
0
1
45
177
21
26
40
10
11
3
9
7
127
532
1
23
7
4
0
1
0
2
38
166
21
0
49
29
6
16
0
3
124
520
Source: Data from "Survey of Contaminated Sites in Wales." Welsh Office/Welsh
Development Agency, 1984.
                                      130

-------
     Industrial waste tips and chemical works can be very hazardous but only
     justify a high priority for treatment when there is a risk of air
     pollution or toxic leachates being generated.  Industrial sites related
     to engineering, smelting and transport are often contaminated by metals
     but do not pose acute hazards and can often be redeveloped for industrial
     usage without specific remedial measures." (WO/WDA, 1984, pp. 66-68).

The Welsh Development Agency—

     The Welsh Development Agency (WDA) was created by the Welsh Development
Agency Act 1975 and began operation on January 1, 1976.  The WDA is empowered
to make grants to County and District
Councils for the purpose of reclaiming
derelict land.  For grant purposes the term "derelict, neglected, or unsightly
land" is defined as "land so damaged by past industrial or other activity that
it is incapable of beneficial use without treatment"  (WDA, 1984a).  The WDA is
also empowered to acquire and reclaim
as its agent.  The WDA is responsible
restore derelict land to beneficial use
bodies (e.g., the National Coal Board, the Forestry Commission, and the
Countryside Commission) the WDA has pDwer to meet the whole cost of
reclamation schemes promoted by local
land or to appoint other bodies to act
for organizing and financing the work to
;e.  In cooperation with other public
authorities  (i.e., the County and
District Councils).  Subject to WDA approval, expenditures eligible for grants
include the following:
     1.  the cost to the local authority of acquisition of land required for
         the project;
     2.  salaries and overheads of the authority's staff or consultants
         engaged in the project design;
     3 .   the salary 'and expenses of a
         works supervision;
resident engineer and staff employed in
     4.  administrative costs incurred in the preparation and execution of
         projects;  and
     5.  the cost of the works including site survey,  demolition and removal
         of derelict structures,  earthmoving,  drainage,  treatment required for
         safety,  landscaping, fencing!  and maintenance (WDA,  1984a).
     To be eligible for total cost reimbursement the WDA requires that local
authorities acquire the freehold interest in the relevant land where the works
will materially increase the value of
initially reimbursed the total eligible costs of acquiring the subject land
and for carrying out the rehabilitati
the land.  Local Authorities are
  works.  In some cases the Agency
                                      131

-------
recovers grant monies based on the value of the restored land.  "Where the
relevant land is to be sold or leased by the Council or appropriated by them
for any revenue producing use, the capital value of the land for the intended
use after reclamation but before development will be deducted from the
expenditure eligible for grant"  (WDA, 1984a).
     Grant aid is also considered for reclamation of publicly owned land not
purchased by the County or District Council. Such grants are normally condi-
tional upon the land-owning Authority making a contribution to the reclamation
costs equivalent to the anticipated enhancement in the land's value (WDA,
1984a).  The Agency also considers grants for reclamation projects on land in
private ownership where it is unlikely that any significant after-value will
be created.
     Individuals,  companies,  corporations,  or bodies other than local
authorities may apply for grants from the WDA.  To be eligible for grants, a
site must have had some previous type of development which has ceased, but the
site must need clearing or reclaiming before any further use can take place.
In general only the costs required for reclamation to bring the site to a
"greenfield state" are eligible  for grant.  Guidelines for the extent of these
types of grants (WDA,1984b) are as follows:
     "Grant may be paid on any net loss incurred by the freeholder or
     leaseholder of derelict land carrying out reclamation work approved by
     the Agency.  The net loss will be determined by offsetting the approved
     total expenditure by the increased value of the land attributable to
     reclamation (see example below), the increased value to be determined by
     the Agency's Valuer.  Grant is normally payable at 80 percent of the net
     loss."
     EXAMPLE:  a.  Cost of reclamation works, £100,000;  b. Value of site
     before reclamation,  £20,000; c.  Value of site after reclamation but
     before development,  £50,000; d.  Increased value of site £30,000;
     e.  Eligibility for grant (a-d) £70,000; f. 80% Grant payable, £56,000."
     The WDA has supported the reclamation and redevelopment of several types
of derelict land.  The largest category of derelict sites involves coal
wastes.  In some instances coal wastes can contribute to land contamination.
More commonly, however, contamination arises at former industrial sites  (e.g.,
steel works) or at sites where coal gas has been produced.  At a former gas.
works site at Newport in County Dyfed, for example, ferricyanide wastes were
encountered.  Before redevelopment of the site, the material considered to be
highly contaminated was excavated and removed to a lined tip.  The site was
then sealed with two meters of clay and is now ready for development.
     In the largest single investment so far,  the WDA is building a production
complex, to be occupied by Hoover, the American washing machine manufacturer,
at Merthy Tydfil in Mid Glamorgan  (WDA, 1984c).  The new plant is being built
                                      132

-------
on land once covered by coal waste anc
mineworkings.  The coal, waste was removed by conveyor belt to another
reclamation site a mile away where it
  honeycombed with abandoned
 will be used as fill material.  To
stabilize the site for the new structures, thousands of tons of a concrete-
like mix were pumped int^ihejaiderg.rc und cavities.  Four thousand boreholes
were sunk as part of the grouting operation.  This work was further
complicated when huge slabs of slag from ancient ironworkings were encountered
during the drilling.  When completed,
 this complex will occupy nearly 38,000
square meters (409,017 square feet) and provide some 3,000 jobs when fully

operational.
     In another type of project, large
  slate quarry holes near Deiniolen in
the Llanberis Valley of Gwynedd are being filled with waste from the tips they

created, enabling the road to be realigned and improving access to the neigh-

boring village (WDA,1984c).  Some of the other land reclamation projects

supported by the WDA JWD,A? 1984c) include the following:

     •    A comprehensive school at Treiegar built on the site of a colliery
         which closed in 1959.

     •    Pentre Hafod Senior Comprehensive School at Swansea built on a site
         once covered by a copper wast
         A new comprehensive school in
         village of Penygraig on the
         closed collieries.
 5 tip.
  the Rhondda Fawr built above the
reclaimed site of tips from the now-
         More than 100 houses and old people's bungalows built by the Gwent
         Borough Council on land previously used for tipping colliery waste.

         A new factory complex in Cwmfelinfach in Gwent,  built on the site of
         a colliery that closed in 1964 leaving derelict buildings,  rusting
         railway tracks, and a massive waste tip.

         The Tafarnaubach Industrial Estate at Ebbw Vale developed on land
         which was once a "moonscape" t>f shale tips.

         A country park at a site at Pembrey in Dyfed following clearance of
         remains of an old ordnance factory.
The WDA works in close coordination with

approving grants for land reclamation

contaminated and derelict land rehabilitation
    the Welsh Office in reviewing arid

 and in carrying out research involving
                                      133

-------
SELECTED CONTAMINATED SITES AND REDEVELOPMENT ISSUES

     In 1985 it was estimated that between 0.5 and 1 percent of the land area
of Wales is contaminated.  This does not include areas despoiled by coal
mining or quarrying.  Contamination resulting from improper disposal of
industrial chemical waste is recognized to pose a potential hazard to human
health and the environment at some sites.  Prior to 1972, uncontrolled tipping
of industrial wastes at refuse tips or at old quarry sites was not uncommon.
Such sites present very complex pollution problems and have not yet been dealt
with extensively.   Some assessment work has been carried out, and plans are
being developed for remedial action at some sites contaminated by industrial
wastes.  Other contaminated sites that may pose potential hazards are
underground burning tips.  An approach for dealing with such sites is still
being developed.  To date, reclamation of this type of site has not been
accomplished.  Some specific examples are given below of contaminated sites
that are receiving attention in Wales.

Lieners Gelatin, Ltd, Pontvpridd, Mid Glamorgan

     A site that is now part of the Treforest Industrial Estate was formerly
occupied by Lieners Gelatin, Ltd., a facility that produced gelatin from
animal hides and bones.  The property is owned by the Welsh Development Agency
(WDA), and Lieners was a former tenant.
     The Lieners operation used animal materials (mainly pig) brought from
various locations.  While the gelatin plant was in operation, twelve plant
employees had contracted anthrax, and although none of these men died from the
infection, one individual who ignored his condition became seriously ill.
There were also reported cattle losses from anthrax linked to the plant.  When
the WDA began planning the site reclamation and redevelopment work, Lieners
warned the Agency of the possibility of anthrax spores which could pose a risk
to workers engaged in the site excavation and possibly to future tenants at
the site.
     Anthrax is an acute, specific, infectious, virulent disease caused by the
spore-forming bacterium Bacillus anthracis.  It occurs in animals, chiefly
cattle, sheep, and horses, and sometimes pigs.'  The disease can be contracted
by workers handling the hides or carcasses of infected animals.  Human
infection may occur as a result of breathing air containing the bacilli or
spores (internal anthrax), or through accidental inoculation via a cut on
                                      134

-------
 exposed skin (external anthrax).   Either form can be life-threatening.
 Inoculation by attenuated bacilli is
                                      ased as a preventive measure in persons
 1'ikely to be exposed to the infectious disease.
      Gelatin is manufactured from substances in the supporting structures of
                                      ;er or dilute acid.  The bones are first
                                      chloric acid to remove mineral matter.
                                       with water.  Skins are limed to remove
vertebrate animals by boiling with wa
degreased and steeped in dilute hydro<
This is followed by repeated washings
albumin and mucus and, after washing with water,.treated with dilute hydro-
chloric acid to swell the collagen.  The treated bones and skin are then
cooked for several hours in water or dilute hydrochloric acid at about .60 °C.
The first "boiling" may be drawn off and the cooking repeated with a fresh
 volume of water at 70 degrees C.  The
 concentrated in vacuum,  and finally c
                                      liquids produced are clarified,.
                                      lilled and cut into,slices.
 anthrax spores can remain dormant for
      Although no anthrax spores were found at  the .site,  it  is  known that
                                      a very long period of time, and the
 precautions to be taken during reclamation.
 reclamation work at the site were inoculated against anthrax.
medical opinion was that there remained a potential hazard, warranting
                                             Workers involved with the
                                                               In order to
learn the location of the most contaminated areas of the site, an effort was
made to locate and interview persons who had worked at the plant.  The site
cleanup included demolition of the buildings and excavation and removal of
foundations.  During the plant's operation, process spills were apparently
directed to the sewers which were found to be badly eaten away by acids.
Excavation at the site uncovered the damaged sewer system.  The contaminated
materials were excavated and removed to a licensed disposal facility where
they were buried.  All surfaces were washed down with a 3:1 acid solution;
 the sewer system beneath the site was
 covered with 0.5 m of clean fill.
      All reclamation  work at  the Lieners  site was overseen by  the WDA.
 site will probably be redeveloped for
                                      rebuilt; and the entire site was finally
                                                                        The
                                      light industrial or commercial use.  A
 paved car park will occupy the part of the site believed to be most highly
:contaminated.
      It  should be  noted  that  the precautions taken  in the reclamation at  the
 Lieners  site to insure against anthrax exposure have not been taken at  other
 sites with potential anthrax  contamination.  A case in  point is an old  chrome
 leather  processing site  that  was reclaimed for use  as a factory.   At the  time
 of  the reclamation work  at the site,  the  potential  problem  of anthrax was not
 considered,  and no precautions were taken.  Fortunately,  no cases  of infection
 developed during the removal  work  at the  site.
                                      135

-------
Penrhose Tip, Rhymney Valley, Caerphillv, Mid Glamorgan

     This 25 hectare (~60 acres) site, located on the side of a narrow valley,
was formerly used as a tip  (dump) for industrial chemical wastes.  Prior to
1940, the site was designated a Planning Consent Tip.  In spite of the history
of receiving industrial wastes at the site, a Planning Application was filed
with the Local Authority  (i.e., the Rhymney Valley Council) for a housing
development plus hotel and garage there.  This Application prompted a review
of the site history.  The site is actually a portion of a larger tract of some
32 ha (80 acres) owned by Duffryn Ffrwd Estate/ Ltd.; most of the site is
covered with colliery shale.  In 1981, the Rhymney Valley Council turned down
an application to develop houses,-a sports complex, and a petrol station, at
                                                             *
Penrhose; however, some of the lands around the tip were allocated for housing
and recreation  (SW Echo, 1984).
     When the Planning Application was submitted for tipping colliery waste,
the site was examined by trial pits to determine the suitability of the site
for further tipping.  Chemical analyses of samples from the trial pits were
performed, although the test results were of limited value, as the trial pits
missed the earlier waste deposits at the site.
     A review of sequential air photographs taken earlier of the site revealed
a history of .industrial chemical disposal.  Lagoons of liquid waste, evident
in a 1947 photograph, are located beneath the proposed housing area.  Later
photographs showed the lagoons covered over by industrial waste and fuel ash.
Large quantities of drummed wastes  (chromates, PCBs, phenols, oils, etc.) were
also deposited later at Penrhos  (WO/WDA, 1984, p. 37).  The wastes probably
originated in metal plating works and electrical and plastics industries in
the south Rhymney Valley.
     The site was abandoned as a chemical disposal site after passage of the
Deposit of Poisonous Wastes Act of  1972 which restricted disposal of toxic
wastes.  However, the chemicals already buried at Penrhos continue to contami-
nate runoff and leachate from the site, particularly during heavy rains.
Leachate can be seen streaming  from the sides of the tip and draining into a
brook.  A greenish oily sheen is seen on the surface of the leachate and the
odor confirms the presence of organic chemicals.  The contaminated brook
(narrow enough to jump across)  separates the Penrhos site from a private
housing development.  Earth moving  and dumping of inert wastes at the tip site
continue.  Some scrubby vegetation,  grows on parts of the site that have not
been recently disturbed.
                                      136

-------
     The location of the former chemical tip adjacent to the residential
development is of some concern.  In December 1984, a dog was blinded after
coming into contact with a chemical leaking from a rusted drum at the site  (SW
Echo, 1984).  This prompted the Local
                                      Authority to post warning signs around
the site which said, "Beware. Dangerous Tip."  The signs were subsequently
removed, however, by the home owners in the immediate vicinity who feared the
warning signs would negatively impact
     In the Welsh Office computer data
                                      their property values.
                                       bank of contaminated sites,  the
Penrhose tip is assigned a Hazard Factor of 5, denoting a very hazardous site
presenting serious health risks to the local population, and a Development
Factor of 4, indicating a high prioritjy site for remedial treatment.
Confidence in the contamination ratings for the site is greater than 90
percent.  Harwell has performed an assessment of the site and has recommended
measures to reduce the likelihood of water pollution (WO/WDA, 1984,p. 37).
Castle Works Burning Tip, Delyn, Clwvo
     This site contains chemical waste
production of rayon textiles.  The buried chemicals are smouldering
                                      s generated by the Castle Works in the
underground, releasing vapors that con
air pollution problem (WO/WDA, 1984, p
burned-out area is also a possibility,
treacherous endeavor.  The site is des
early 1985, the Welsh Office received
                                      stitute a small but potentially serious
                                      .  57).  Subsidence throughout the
                                       making assessment of the site a
                                      cribed as a "very nasty problem."  In
                                      proposals to perform a 6-month effort to
define the extent of the problem at the burning tip and to evaluate possible
solutions.  The effort, which includes sampling and analyses is estimated to
cost about  £55,000 ($46,300) is to be jointly funded by the WDA and the Local
Council.  (The monies provided by the Local Council are supplied from the
European Development Fund.)
     The•assessment and evaluation work will be performed by D. L. Barry of
Atkins Research, Ltd.  This investigation is important in that it sets a
precedent.  The feasibility of reclamation at a burning tip has not yet been
demonstrated in Wales.

Llwyneinion Brick Pits, Wrexham Maeloa, Clwyd
                                   several
     At Llwyneinion,  near Wrexham,
brickmaking) have been used as industrial
site used for tipping acid tars from
other chemicals (WO/WDA, 1984, p. 56).
      abandoned clay pits (from
     chemical waste tips.  One 5-acre
refineries on Merseyside and probably
   There was also fly tipping
                                      137

-------
 (uncontrolled tipping) of drummed wastes until 1972.  The semi-solid tar
wastes are covered by a layer of volatile hydrocarbons and rainwater.  The
site poses a potential hazard because of air pollution and possibly water
pollution.  An assessment of the site concluded that there was no fire hazard
at the site, but this proved to be wrong, as a terrible fire occurred later.
The site has since been tidied up a bit and fenced.  Consulting engineers have
been hired to look into the problems at the site, but so far have been unable
to find a viable solution to stabilize the site for future use.   A proposal
to cover the site with a synthetic membrane to make a boating and fishing lake
was withdrawn because feasibility was unlikely.

I.T.T./Hants Capacitors/Erie El, Wrexham Maelor, Clwyd

     This site to the east of Wrexham was formerly occupied by a large wartime
ordnance factory and store (WO/WDA, 1984,, p. 56).  Old aerial photographs have
identified a section of the complex as a chemical plant which was used after
the war by an electronics components firm.  The area is currently being
developed as the Wrexham Industrial Estate.
     An investigation has turned up capacitors, buried drums,  and high
concentrations of PCB's on the site.  A contract was let in 1985 to perform an
assessment of the site and to demonstrate the effectiveness of in-place
treatment of PCB's using a microbial degradation process.  If this appears
successful, a second contract will be let for trials on the site to
demonstrate effectiveness of the treatment.
     In the Welsh Office Contaminated Land Computer Data Bank,  this site is
assigned a Hazard Factor of 4, indicating that potential health risks are
associated with chemical releases from the site.  Because the site is a high
priority for development, it is assigned a Development Factor of 5, indicating
that remedial action is highly desirable.

Cement Asbestos Waste Site, Cardiff, South Glamorgan

     The site of the Cardiff Airport Industrial Estate,  located near the
Cardiff Airport was formerly occupied by a cement asbestos plant.  Waste from
the old plant remains buried just beneath the surface.  The area is being
redeveloped privately .as an industrial estate.  Heavy truck traffic across the
area containing buried asbestos has exposed the material.  Both sheet asbestos
and bags containing asbestos waste can be seen protruding from the worn down
surface.  The asbestos waste is dispersed about the area by the wind and by
                                      138

-------
 passing vehicles servicing the adjacert firm which makes wooden pallets.  The
 heavy vehicular traffic in turn exposes still more material that is released.
 as dust.  There is concern about the potential health hazard posed by asbestos
 particles in the air in the vicinity.
 Asbestos particles have been measured
 in air samples taken .near the site.
     The  solution to this problem may  be  to  simply move  the  road so that
 traffic across the buried asbestos  is  eliminated or  to stabilize the buried
 material  by paving the traffic area with  asphalt.  The area  is virtually  flat,
 and in an early stage  of development so that either  of these solutions could
 be implemented without major impacts on the  Industrial Estate.
     The  Local Authority would like  to acquire  the property  for" use as a
 municipal refuse tip.   However,  because there is a tendency  for refuse tips to
 attract large  numbers  of birds,  this may  not be a viable use of the site  due
 to the proximity to the Cardiff Airport.
CASE STUDY:  THE  LOWER SWANSEA VALLEY,
Site Location and  Special  Characterist
tfEST GLAMORGAN,  WALES
                                       .cs
     The City of Swansea, the second largest city in Wales, is located near
the mouth of the River Tawe on the  south coast of Wales  in the County of West
Glamorgan.  The region to the north and east of the city, along  the  tidal
reach of the River Tawe  is known as thk Lower Swansea Valley.  For most of the
250 years after industrialization began in Great Britain, the Lower  Swansea
Valley was a dominant focus of economic life,in South Wales; more people were
employed here than in any, other comparable area of the region  (Humphrys et
al., 1979,,p. 220).  The major industries were coal mining, brick clay
extraction, and primary metals production.  This region, often called the
metallurgical capital of Wales, was for many years a,center for  copper, zinc,
tin plate, steel, and patent fuel industries.  As these  industries declined,
much of the valley was left in a state
whole civilian center of Swansea was destroyed by air raids.
     In 1961, the Lower Swansea Valley
existing problems in the valley and to
     Two rivers flow through the Lower
of dereliction.   In February  1941,  the
Project was initiated to address the
begin the planning for  future
development.  The focus area of The Lower Swansea Valley Project indicated in
Figure 15, encompassed some 480 ha (1,:.86 acres) of industrial dereliction.
Swansea Valley Project Area—the River
Tawe, with a catchment area of about 260 square kilometers, and the Nant-y-
Fendrod, which discharges into the River Tawe at Landore and has a catchment
area of about 14 square kilometers (Davies, 1979, p. 79) .  Major floods have
                                      139

-------
                             Lower Swansea
                             Valley Project
                      t'Bi     Area
                      • jf
""335?fay*.
Figure 15.  Location of the Lower Swansea Valley Project,


                    (Source:  Bridges, 1984a, p. 2)
                            140

-------
 occurred in the past through the overflow of the,rivers,  and in 1971 levees
 were constructed  and other measures taken to provide flood relief.   The water
 level in the Nant-y-Pendrod  remains affected by  the discharge of the River
 Tawe, the discharge from its own catchment area,  and the  tidal influences at
 the confluence of both rivers.

 Land Use History

      At  the  beginning of the  18th century,  Swansea  was already an important
 shipping  outlet for  the export  of coal
                                           from the South Wales Coalfield.   The
                                            in the Lower Swansea Valley.   Later
                                          iljied farther up the valley.  For many
availability  and abundance of the  Welsh coal  and ores  brought by the returning
coal  ships made the region ideal for siielting and metals processing.  At
different times during  the 18th and 19th centuries, copper as well as lead,
zinc,  silver,  and arsenic were smelted
steel  and tinplate works  were establis
years,  the Lower Swansea  Valley had one of the heaviest  concentrations of
metals processing industries in Britain.  By  1961, almost all of this activity
in the valley had ceased,  but the  legacy of the many years of metals
processing remained.
     To be economical, copper production was  highly dependent on  the
availability  of coal as well as copperjrich ores.  To  produce one ton of
copper required about 18  tons of coal And 13  tons of copper ore  (Bridges,
1984a,  p. 3).   The valley cut by the Tciwe River north  of the Swansea district
transects the  South Wales Coalfield providing easy access to enormous coal
deposits.  The coal consumed in  the Va]
vicinity by mules and wagons and later
                                           ley was  brought  from mines  in the
                                           by canal and tramways.   The early
Authors' Note:  In April 1984 in conjunction with a meeting held in Cardiff, the NATO-CCMS
Committee for the Study of Contaminated Land visited the Lower Swansea Valley.   For the benefit
of the Committee's site visit. Dr. E.  M. Bridges] of the University College of Swansea compiled
information on the history of metallurgical working in the Valley and the investigations and
progress since 1967.   Dr. Bridges has  been involved with the reclamation program in Swansea since
the Project began in 1961.  Much of the historical information in this case study is derived from
Dr. Bridges' report for the NATO Committee.
Two very valuable information sources  used for this case study are the 1979 volume Dealing With
Dereliction, the Redevelopment of the  Lower Swansea Valley, edited by Dr. Rosemary D. F.  Bromley
and Dr. Graham Humphrys, and the 1983  report,  "Change and Industrial Redevelopment in the Lower
Swansea Valley" by Dr. Bromley and Dr.  Richard Hi Morgan with a section on Water Quality by
Stephen C.  Bird.  The Volume edited by Bromley arid Humphrys presents papers and comments from a
conference funded by the Nuffield Foundation and held at the University of Swansea in April,
1979.  The second document presents the results df research sponsored by the Nuffield Foundation
and carried out during 1981 and 1982.
Our own impressions of the Lower Swansea Valley derive from a site visit in March 1985   The
successes of the planning and reclamation programs here over the  last two decades are encouraging
to reclamation efforts elsewhere.   We  applaud the]'vision and determination of the many
individuals who have contributed to the revitalization of the Lower Swansea Valley

-------
copper works processed ore from Cornwall, Devon, and North Wales.  British
ores were later replaced by ores brought from other parts of the world.
Partly refined ores were also imported for finishing in the Swansea works.
     The first copper smelter was established in the Valley at Landore in 1717
and continued production of copper, as well as lead and zinc1 until 1748.
Other early copper works included the Cambrian  (1720-1745), the White Rock
(1737-1920), the Middle Bank  (1755-1924), and the Upper Bank  (1757-1928).
Larger works, employing up to 300 men were built early in the 19th century—
The Hafod (1810-1924) and the Morfa (1835-1924).  At least eight other works
were engaged in smelting or processing copper ores in the Valley during the
19th century.
     Copper ores, usually chalcopyrite (CuFeS2)  or calcocite (Cu2S)  were first
calcined  (roasted) to remove  impurities.  The roasted ore was then smelted to
a mixture of copper and iron  sulfides known as copper matte.  The matte was
then smelted with coke and silaceous fluxes to slag away the  iron.  The
product was resmelted to form "coarse" copper which was then refined. The
sulfur gases and metal fumes  driven off  during these processes were released
to the atmosphere.
     Until 1880, copper was the most important smelting industry in the
valley.   In the period up to  1880, Swansea had over 90 percent of Britain's
copper smelting capacity  (Bridges, 1984a, p. 3).  From about  1840, however,
the Swansea Valley copper smelting industry began to decline, and zinc
production increased in importance.  This change came about because the
smelting  process used in the  valley to produce metallic copper became
outdated, -replaced by" the more  economical Bessemer process at other locations.
By 1920,  only one copper smelter  remained.
     Six  zinc (or spelter) works were established in ,the Swansea Valley
beginning in 1836.  Two of these  were converted copper smelters.  Production
of zinc began with the mineral  sphalerite  (ZnS) which was  roasted to drive off
the sulfur.  Zinc smelting took place in an enclosed furnace  in which  the zinc
vapor was recondensed into metallic zinc.  As with  copper,  zinc production was
highly dependent  on abundant  local coal  supplies; between  6 and  25  tons  of
coal were consumed per ton of zinc product.  The  zinc was  used to make brass
and other alloys  and to make  galvanized  iron.   By  1914, Swansea was producing
20 percent  of Britain's  zinc.  However,  all but one of the zinc works  closed
between  1924  and 1928.  The market  for  zinc was lost to the more economical
electrolytic plants  elsewhere.   The Swansea Vale works, modernized  with
government  aid  in 1916,  continued to produce  zinc with a blast  furnace process
and  sulfuric  acid and lead as by-products until 1974  (Bridges,  1984a,  p. 7).
                                      142

-------
      In addition to copper and zinc, o;:her metals were also processed in the
 valley.  Silver and lead were produced in association with the copper.  A com-
 bined copper and arsenic works operated on the eastern side of the valley
 between 1866 and 1905.  Another works produced cobalt and nickel.  By-products
 of the various metals processing works
                                       were copper sulfate, sulfuric acid.
 zinc chloride and zinc sulfate.
      Prom the mid-19th century, the availability of coal in the Valley and
 fast-flowing streams to provide sources of power and necessary process water
 led to the growth of steel and tinplate industries.  The steel industry in the
 Swansea Valley was based on the open hearth furnace developed by Siemans who
                                                           Five years later, a
established the first steel works in the Valley in 1868.
 larger works was built, capable of producing 1,000 tons of steel per week.
 This plant,  which produced steel bar,  Employed some 2,000 men and was one of
 the largest  in the world at that time  Bridges,  1984a,  p. 10).  The steel bars
 were rolled  and plated with tin in the smaller "packmills."   Tinplate is a
 sheet of steel which has been coated with tin by being, dipped in a molten bath
 of tin.   By the early 20th century,  at
                                       least seven tinplate works were in
 operation in the valley,  and three-fourths of the tinplate manufactured in
 Great Britain was made in the Swansea Region.
      Steel production was  changed from
                                       bars  to  tubes  in  1888.   By 1919,  35,000
 tons  of steel tubes were produced annually in the Swansea works.   The later
 decline of steel production in the valley has been attributed to  inadequate-
 road  access and a trend toward large-scale integrated  plants.
 early steel works in the Swansea  Valley
 several  remaining  tinplate works  in  the
as production was  shifted  to  larger, mojre  efficient plants outside  the  Swansea
region.
     The metals production industries t.
Valley are indicated  in Figure 16.  The
                                                               The last of the
                                         the  Duffryn,  closed in 1961.   The
                                       valley  also  closed  after  World War  II,
                                       lat were active in the Lower Swansea
                                       chronology of the operations  is  shown
in Figure 17.  The extent of the industrial activity made the Valley the  focus
of attention for the work force of the region and for the suppliers of goods
and services catering to the industrial
                                       undertakings.  Most of the workers
lived in settlements built for them aloig the valley sides high enough-to be-
above the majpr air pollution that tendU to stagnate in the Valley.
    'Along with cheap and accessible coal,  the'good location along a navigable
river and in close proximity to Swansea
                                       Bay and the Bristol Channel
facilitated industrialization of the Valley.  The development of the Swansea
Docks paralleled the growth of the Valley industries.  In 1852, a meander of
the Tawe River near its entrance to the
new channel called the New Cut, and its
                                      143
                                       Harbor was diverted eastward into a
                                       old channel was locked and floated,

-------
144

-------
  1700            1750

         (J-?u.J?u...Pb.Ag

             Cu
1800
1850
1900
1950
                                          Cu
                                             «Cu, Fe
                                       Cu
                                      crushing slags
                                                      stal
                          Zn
                                                             Tin plate
                                                          Q5)

                                                         ®"
                                                            (l
                                                      Spelter
                                                                Zn
                                                            Cu, As
                                                    ^»<«»»»»J!JLE!!!fL
                                                             Tin plate
                                                              Tin plate
                                                            Tin plate
                                                          (28)
                                                              Tmjolate
                                                                                «Zn
                                                                       MOOWKOCWMOOOOM
                                                                         Steel works
                                                                      and tin plate
                                                                      Tin plate
                                                   oc o«««»w«. s
Figure 17.   Chronology of metals production in the  Lower  Swansea Valley from
              1717  to 1980.               '
                                        141

-------
thereby forming the North Dock.  A patent fuel factory (which processed coal

fines into briquettes), copper ore yards and other mineral sheds were inland

between the North Dock and the New Cut.  The South Dock on the western side of

the river opened in 1859, mainly for shipping coal and discharging timber.

The next developments were on the east side of the river.  The Prince of Wales

Dock, opened in 1881, connected with the Tennant Canal.  The Kings Dock opened

in 1909 farther east with an entrance direct from the bay.  Both of these

docks were used to meet the demands for the shipping of anthracite coal.

Almost 162 ha  (400 acres) of land were reclaimed from the sea by the

embankment built in connection with the Kings Dock.  The Queens Dock, built in

association with the Llandarey Oil Refinery,  was established in this

reclaimed area in 1920.  The old North Dock was closed in 1928 and filled in

during the 1930's.  The development of the Swansea Docks is illustrated in

Figure 18.  At its maximum, the Swansea Docks included some 114 ha (281 acres)

of deep water  and over 9.6 kilometers  (6-miles) of quay.  The docks on the

eastern bank are still operational, but at a relatively  low level of activity

 (Bridges, 1984, p. 12).


Redevelopment  Objectives
     A fitting description  of  the physical  environment created by the

 succession of industries in.the Lower Swansea Valley is  taken from  a paper by

 M.  J. Ward,  County Engineer and Surveyor for the West Glamorgan  County Council

 in  1979--

      "By  the end of the  nineteenth  century,  the  Project  Area, of some  445  ha,
     was  wholly  taken up with  use for industries of  varying  sizes and  in
     various stages of development  and decay.  New industries had been founded
     on the sites of old ones,  but  the important aspect,  common  to  virtually
     all,  was the need to dispose of their  industrial wastes.  All  open areas
     were gradually used up; the tips encroached into the river  Tawe and
     obstructed  flow; open  land on  the periphery of  the  Project  Area,  such as
     at Pentre-Hafod on  the west and White  Rock  on the east,  became manor  slag
     tips,  mostly of copper slag.   Similarly,  to the north of the A48  steel
      slag tipping occupied  a large  area near the Upper Forest and Worcester
     Works.  Without tipping space  for waste,  the works  could not have
     prospered and the tips became, therefore, an integral part  of  the
      existing landscape.

      "The transfer of the ferrous  industry  to large  scale plants, particularly
      after 1945, together with the  earlier  decline of the non-ferrous
      industry, resulted  in  complete deterioration and physical decay of the
     Valley floor.  Thus by 1960,  over 60 percent of the Valley  floor  was  in a
      substantially derelict condition, with a mass of slag heaps,  ruined
      buildings,  underground structures, abandoned railways and canals, and
      with much of the soil  on  the  eastern downwind slopes so polluted  by fumes
      that little or nothing grew.   It was probably then  the  most extensive
      contiguous  area of  industrial dereliction to be found anywhere in the
      United Kingdom."   (Ward,  1979, pp. 244-245)

                                       146

-------
  Pre 1800
                                   Built-up area
                                   River Deposits
  1800-1850
 Built-up area
 Coal Wharvas
                                   Built-up area
                                   Railway Lines
                                   Coal Wharves
 1860
 Built-up area
 Railway Lines
 Coal Wharves
  1882
                                   Built-up area     {%%)
                                   Dry Docks       m
                                   Railway Lines     +++
 1908
Built -up area
Dry Docks
Railway Lines
Coal Wharves
                                                                       P.WD Prince of Wales Dock
                                   Built-up area
                                   Dry Docks
                                   Railway Lines
                                   Coal Wharves
 1982
Built-up area
Dry Docks
Oil Storage
Dry Cargo Berths
Dock Roads
Railway Lines
                   P.W.D Prince of Wales Dock
Figure  18.   Development of the  Swansea

                              (Source:   Bridges
docks.

,  1984a,' p.  11)
                                                147

-------
     Prior to 1960, planning legislation and Central Government finance were
not directed towards reclamation and environmental improvements.  From 1960 to
1968, with momentum from the Lower Swansea Valley Project, there was a major
impetus towards reclamation, and people began rethinking the future
development of the area.

The Lower Swansea Valley Project—
     In 1961, the Lower Swansea Valley Project was initiated, "...to
investigate the physical, social, and economic situation in the Lower Swansea
Valley, to understand the reasons which had inhibited its development in the
past, and to provide the information necessary for its future development"
(Hilton, 1967).  Mr. Robin Huws Jones is credited with inspiring the whole
Project and, financial assistance was provided by the Nuffield Trust, the
Swansea County Borough Council, the Welsh Office, and the University College
of Swansea,  investigations. - The Project was the first stage of information
gathering and interpretation,  leading to the renewal of the devastated  land
and development of new forms of land use in the Valley  (Bridges 1984a,  p.  12).
     The work of the Lower Swansea Valley Project is contained in twelve study
reports addressing various  factors relating to the reclamation and
redevelopment of the area.  The study topics include the  following:
     Human ecology
     Transportation and Physical Planning
     Hydrology
     Geology
     Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Survey
     Prospects for Industrial  Use
     Housing
     Open Space
     Plant Ecology (Soils and  Revegetation Trials)
     Soil Biology
     Afforestation
     Tips and Tip  Working.
 In addition  an  estimate  was made  of  quantities of materials  in the  Northern
 Part of the  area,  and an investigation  was  carried  out  to determine the
 feasibility  of  creating an artificial  lake  in  the  Project area (Bridges,
 1984a,  pp.  13,  14).   The results  of  these  studies are  summarized in a final
 document edited by the Project Director, Mr.  K.J. Hilton (1967).
      The Lower  Swansea Valley  Project was the  first  thorough investigation in
 Britain of the reasons for dereliction and its persistence (Bridges,  1984a, p.
 17).  Time has proven the significance of  this Project,  and the initiatives
 and foresight of the Project Investigators  deserve  much credit.   The most
 significant and far-reaching guidance pertained to the following
 contributions:
                                       148

-------
      An Accurate and Detailed Base Mao—To obtain an accurate and detailed
 base map of the area, aerial photography of the Valley was flown in June 1962.
 This,  combined with existing Ordnance Survey plans, enabled exact locations of
 former smelting works to be determined along with the areas and volumes of the
 many waste tips.  The Project Area wak sub-divided into plots where common
 problems occurred or where similar types of wastes were deposited (Bridges,
 1984a,  p!4).
     Visual  Improvements Through Planting Trees and Grasses—Experimental work
 was carried out to learn what species and conditions were most favorable to
 plant  growth in the barren,  eroded and contaminated soils.  Efforts were begun
 in 1963 to bring back the green to th* Valley and to hide the ugliness that
 could  not be removed. In 1966,  when t:
 its work,  over 100,000 trees had been
 of 20  ha (49.4 acres) (Lavender,  1979
     Statement of  the Need  for  a  Sing
                                      le  Lower Swansea Valley Project concluded
                                       established on 16  sites covering a total
                                       p.  154) ..
                                       e  Body, to Acquire All  the Land to Be
 Redeveloped--The  Project summary repoJrt  (Hilton,  1967)  identified large tracts
 of  land which it  recommended should be acquired by one  body (preferably a
 public  body)  in order to carry out  the overall  plan for reclamation in the
 Project Area.
     Planning  that  Included  Housing and Recreation As Well  As  Industry—When
                                      1      ~
the  Project began,  the proposed  Development  Plan  showed mainly  industrial  use
                                                      The  Project  summary
in the Valley, reflecting the existing use pattern.
report  (Hilton, 1967) included recommendations that the Valley should be used
for housing and recreation, as well as for the traditional industrial uses.
In particular, the need for open space in the Valley was stressed.

Planning After 1965—
     The formal work of the Lower Swansea Valley Project was essentially
complete in 1965, and financial backiijg for further research work in the
Valley was unavailable until several years later.  However, planning for the
future was set in a new direction thati eventually would lead to revitalization
of the Project Area.
     In 1968,  the Swansea County Borough Council prepared a Draft Development
Plan "incorporating many of the recommendations from the Project Report (Ward,
1979,  p. 248).  In addition to allocations for an industrial zone, areas were
shown for recreation, open space, and
                                      woodlands.  A small area for new housing
was indicated on the eastern slopes  (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 9).  The
Plan also included a new highway network for the'area and "improvement of the
river Tawe to form a pleasant landscaped corridor through the Valley...."
(Ward, 1979, p. 249).
                                      149

-------
     The Council recognized the need for a more detailed development plan and
engaged a consultant, W. S. Atkins and Partners, to further develop the 1968
Draft Plan.  This resulted in the planning document that was turned over to
the successor authorities following Local Government reorganization in 1974.
(Ward, 1979, p. 250; Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 9).  This plan'maintained
the primary use allocations in the 1968 Plan, but provided more detail
including layouts of industrial estates, alternative sites for sports
facilities, overall landscape considerations, costings, and a phased program
of implementation (Ward, 1979, p. 250).
     The Local Government Act of 1972 imposed a two-tier system of government
on the County Borough areas like Swansea.  On April 1, 1974, the new Swansea
District  (City) Council and the West Glamorgan County Council came into being,
thus ending the autonomy of the Swansea County Borough Council.  Water and
Health functions were dispersed to ad hoc bodies under separate statutory
provisions, while the remaining functions of the old County Borough were
allocated between the new City and County Councils.  The new Swansea City
Council continued the land acquisition  (see  section 4.2.5), planning,
reclamation, and redevelopment initiatives begun by the County Borough
Council.
     In June 1975, the Swansea City Council adopted and published the Interim
Planning Statement prepared by the City Planning Department.  The 1975 Plan
divided the Valley into three main sections:  an Industrial Park North of A48;
a second  Industrial  Park, between the  A48 and the main Swansea-London railway
line; and an urban recreational park,  south  of  the main railway line.  The
1975  Interim Planning Statement emphasized the  potential  for the river Tawe as
an important amenity feature, unifying the east and west  sides of the Valley
and  linking the Valley with the South  Dock area (Howell,  1979, p. 254).
     Several modifications to the Interim Planning Statement were made during
the  next  two years.  One major new proposal  called  for a  lake  (to be located
within  the  central  Industrial  Park on  low-lying marshland)  which would  serve
for  flood control of the Nant-y-Fendrod as well as  for amenity  functions.
This proposal  was incorporated in the  Lower  Swansea Valley "Action  Area Plan:
Industrial  Park"  of  December  1976  (Bromley and Morgan,  1983, p.  11) .
      In April  1980 the Government announced  the Enterprise Zone Policy,  a
government-funded program  that could serve to promote the growth  of commercial
enterprise in  Swansea.   For  an area  designated as  an Enterprise  Zone,  the
government offers special  incentives to encourage  firms  to locate within the
                                       150

-------
 Zone.   Emphasis is placed on capital subsidies and exemption from rates
 (taxes)  (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p.
 imposed to retain a consistent qualitj
 Zone.
 by the City Council of the Industrial
 Action Area Plan was superseded by a ].arge-scale working plan that defined
 boundaries  for a proposed Enterprise Zone.   The boundaries and general
 concepts  of the 1976 Plan for the two
 control lake and the basic road plan)
152).  Strict planning controls are
' of development within an Enterprise
      Consideration of the  Enterprise  2one  designation prompted a reappraisal
Zone plans adopted in 1976. The 1976
Industrial Zones  (i.e., the flood-
were reflected in the Enterprise Zone
 Plan.  .Following ratification by the Secretary of State for Wales,  the
 Enterprise  Zone  became official  in Jurie  1981.   Soon after,  the terminology was
 changed  from "Zone"  to "Park,  reflecting the concept of commercial  sites set.
 in wide  landscaped belts  (analogous tcj the planned industrial  park  concept).
     The Enterprise  Park  is now  viewed as one  of  five  interrelated  parks
 comprising  the master  plan  for the Lover Swansea  Valley and its extension into
 the City of Swansea.   The Five Park Planning Scheme (shown  in  Figure  19)
 reflects the essence of the Planning Statement of 1975.  Areas are  designated
 for the Enterprise Park,  a Leisure Park,  a Riverside Park,  a City Park,  and a
 Maritime Park.   These  five parks together constitute the Urban Renaissance
national demonstration site designated
 (Bromley and Morgan,  1983, p.  16).
 by the Council of Europe in 1980
Conditions in the Valley and  Its Relationship to the Region—
     To comprehend the problems to be .Dvercome to accomplish the reclamation
and revitalization of the Lower Swansea Valley envisioned in the planning
documents, one must recognize the conditions of people living in the Valley
and the relationship of the Valley to
closure of the coal mines and most of
its surrounding communities.  After the
the metals works in the 1960's,  the
employment shifted to other areas, the
Valley was no longer the focus of activity that it had been for many years.
Though some new manufacturing was developed in the Valley, many of the reasons
for people to live in or near the Vail
ay were gone.   As opportunities for
 Valley became a divisive influence
separating the populations living on the east and west sides; there was no
easy access across the Valley floor (Humphrys, et al., 1979, p. 221).  The
closed industries, the slag tips, and derelict properties left in the Valley
were unpleasant, and the people who continued to reside there were
stigmatized.
                                       51

-------
                                 Enterprise Park
                                 Leisure Park
                                 Riverside Park
                                 City Park
                                 Maritime Park
Figure 19.  The  Five Park planning scheme.

                  (Source:  Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p. 15)

                           152

-------
     Most of the houses  in the Valley
                                      are in terraces built before 1919, and
 at  the  time  of  the  Lower  Swansea  Project  Study  this was  recognized to  be  a
 major part of the city's  urban  improvement problem (Fagg,  1979, p.  127).   In
 1960 much of the existing housing in  the  Valley was substandard—structurally
 unsound or lacking  basic  amenities such as hot  or  cold water,  fixed bath,  or
 inside  water closet.  Occupants were  increasingly  unable or unwilling  to
 improve  the  conditions  (Fagg,  1979, p.
 were  inadequate;  education beyond  the
 in the Valley  east of the river  (Hutsc
                                       127).  Schools and community facilities
                                      primary stage was not available anywhere
                                      m and Stacey, 1979, p. 117).
     Humphreys, Bromley, and Clark  (1979, p. 219- 227) examined industrial
activity and employment within  the  Swansea  region, and the changes  that have
taken place since the  1960's.   They nested that by the early  1970's  urban
spread had filled in most of the open areas which had existed between  the
earlier separated settlements around the southern part of Western Industrial
South Wales.
                                      I
              Eventually these settlements merged into a single built up area,
the conurbation of Swansea Bay City  (Humphrys 1972, p. 181) .  Production
industry, transport functions, and working class housing dominate the north
and east of the conurbation; public and private services and commercial and
retail activities are concentrated south of Townhill and west of the River
Tawe, the southwest area of the conurbation is essentially a high class,
status address, residential, resort, alnd retirement area (Humphrys et al.,
1979, p. 221).  Within this context, the Lower Swansea Valley was, in 1979,
only a part of the northern and eastern industrial zone.  Changes in the
Valley continue to alter its relationship to the surrounding communities in
the region.
     The planning concepts inherent in
foster industrial development in a planned environment and to bring new jobs
to the Lower Swansea Valley.  Just as
designed to enhance the natural amenities and bring people into the Valley.
The program of land assembly by the Lt
reclamation were the essential first  :
Valley.
Nature of the Contamination
     Over the many years of metals pro
                                       the Five Park Scheme are intended to
                                      important, however, are the concepts
                                      cal Authority and the progress in site
                                      teps to begin this revitalization of the
tions.  Enormous volumes of metallurgi
were tipped alongside the various work
                                      oessing in the valley,  there was little
concern for the long-term environmental consequences of the industries' opera-
                                      cal slags as well as coal ash and slag
                                          In the 1964 Project report, "Tips
                                      |
and Tip Working in the Lower Swansea Valley," G. Holt estimated that
approximately 162 hectares (400 acres)
                                       of the Lower Swansea Valley Project
                                       53

-------
Area was covered by waste tips containing some 5 million tons of industrial
waste  (Davies, R.L., 1979, p. 77).  In addition, wastes from the White Rock
Works and the Hafod Works had been carried up onto the adjacent valley sides.
Miscellaneous manufacturing  wastes and urban domestic wastes were also
deposited at various sites in the Valley.  Air pollution from the heavy
industrial activity spread sulfur and heavy metals over very large areas,
eventually affecting vegetation throughout the Valley.  Bridges (1984a, p. 18)
described three types of derelict ground that could be distinguished in the
Valley—
             Badly eroded,  infertile and largely non-toxic clay loams;
(i)
     (ill)
       Tips of  relatively  innocuous waste materials  (e.g.', shale,
       foundry  sand,  furnace  slag, domestic refuse);
       Tips of  waste  poisonous  to plant growth derived  from the  smelting
       of  copper and  zinc  ores.
Pollutants of Concern—
     Several elements present in the accumulated wastes and contaminated
surfaces in the Valley pose a potential hazard to aquatic organisms if these
materials are released into streams, lakes, or rivers.  Undisturbed wastes
that have weathered for many years may appear to be stabilized, with respect
to leaching of heavy metals.  However, when sites containing such wastes are
disturbed  (e.g., leveled or excavated for development), large amounts of
unweathered material may be exposed, and heavy metals will again be released
to surface waters by leaching and runoff.  Copper and zinc are present in very
high concentrations in tipped wastes from smelting.  These elements have also
been dispersed throughout the Valley by airborne particulate from the smelters
and from wind-blown dust from tipped wastes.  Other elements of potential
hazard that are likely to be present in contaminated wastes and soils include
antimony, arsenic, cadmium, and  lead.
     Antimony and arsenic are invariably present as trace elements in copper
sulfide ores and are eliminated  during calcining.  These elements may also be
present in zinc ores.  Of the trace elements present in the ores, arsenic has
the greatest tendency to volatilize.  Arsenic was produced as a product in at
least one smelter at Llansamlet  (Bridges, 1984a, p. 6).  Cadmium occurs as a
sulfide salt in association with zinc and lead ores.  Thus it is likely to be
widely dispersed by air pollution from the smelters and as a trace metal in
                                      154

-------
 tipped zinc wastes.   Lead ores were  snelted in  several  of  the  early works  in
 the Valley.   It  is also a common  component  of copper  and zinc  ores  and is
 eliminated during the refining processes.   Accumulations of  all  these  elements
 in  soils  in  the vicinity of  smelters
nay result in high local concentrations
much as 30 percent  of  the dry weight
 in nearby waters.
     Coal and coke are also present in the tipped slag wastes, comprising as
   some materials.   Though probably not
of concern  from  the  risk  of  fire or  tDxic  effects, the presence of  these
materials in waterways  can increase  chemical oxygen demand.   Coal and  coke
also tend to bind volatile metals released during ore roasting and  may contain
significant levels of the elements mentioned above.  Wastes  from coking
operations and from  coal  gas production are also considered  to be potentially
hazardous to human health and to aqua
tars, phenolic wastes, and spent iron
cyanides.
:ic  ecosystems.   Such wastes  include coal
 oxides  containing sulfides and complexed
Slag Wastes From Metals Works—
     As part of the Lower Swansea Valley Project investigations, calculations
were made of the areas and volumes of the many tip complexes.  The estimates
were based on aerial photography flown in June 1962 and existing Ordnance
Survey plans  (Bridges, 1984a, p. 14).
  It was possible  to distinguish the
different types of metalliferous slagis by their color and texture.  The copper
wastes were reddish brown and contained large fused lumps of slag.  The iron
and steel wastes were light grey and of a gravelly texture.  The zinc wastes
were dark grey and sandy.  The metalliferous slags, particularly the zinc  .
slags, were often rich in the metal that was being extracted since the
processing techniques were not highly
controlled.  Some of the tipped  zinc
slags contained up to 10 or 11 percent zinc  (Bridges, -1984a, p. 7).  Some tips
on the site of the 'Swansea Vale Works were estimated to contain between 11 and
30 percent lead making it economical to remove some of the richest material
for metals extraction (Davies, R.L., 1979, p. 77).  Some of the slag heaps had
been worked for hardcore to be used in road construction.  In these cases, the
large fused masses could not be dealt with easily, so they were left isolated
on the worked over sites (Bridges, 1984a, p!2).  The approximate locations of
the various types of metals works wastes are shown in Figure 20.  The areas of
severe erosion are also indicated.
     The various wastes were classified (from visual examination and
historical data) according to their origin (e.g., from copper smelting, zinc
smelting, or ferrous metals works).  Over 160 solid samples were taken at
various depths from tips in the Project Area and analyzed for selected metals.
                                      155

-------
                                      £!•Pent re Chwyth
                                                           V%!t$m Areas where soil
                                                                 has been eroded
                                                                  Gullies
                                                 Active Industry
                                                 Active Tipping
                                                 Tips
                                                 Railways and Railway Land
                                                 Other neglected areas and
                                                 derelict sites
                                                 Recreation
                                                 Commercial
                                                 Predominantly residential
Figure  20.   Waste materials and  erosion in the  Lower. Swansea  Valley before
             reclamation.
                   (Adapted from Bridges,  1984a,  pp.  13,  32)

                                156

-------
 The highest levels determined in these analyses (Davies,  R.L.,  1979,  p.  77)
 were as follows:
      Total  copper  (Cu)	8,510  ppm;
      Total  iron (Fe)	226,500  ppm;
      Total  lead (Pb)	49,000  ppm;
      Total  zinc (Zn)	111,000  ppm.
      The solubility of these  elements  varied considerably in  different tips.
 The wastes  deposited in a given tip mky have been generated from processing
 ores of different  origin,  or  process changes may have  been made that  altered
 the chemical  composition of the wastek.   Natural weathering processes also
 tend to stratify soluble trace  elements.   As a  result,  even seemingly
 homogeneous tips were found to  be quite variable in  their chemical
 composition.

 Assessment  and  Research Efforts to  Characterize Contamination—
      The nature of  the  contamination for  selected  sites has been  reported  as
part of  later assessment and research
 efforts.    Three  such  efforts  are
discussed below.
     Vertical Distribution of Trace Elements in Copper Tips—Chase, and
Wainwright  (1983) measured the vertical distribution of'EDTA-extractable
copper, zinc, and lead in two copper  smelter waste tips in the Valley.  One of
the tips (Plot 35) had remained undisturbed for more than,100 years.  The
second tip  (Plot 49) had been leveled
29 years prior to the  study.  The
material in the tips had been produced by different companies, probably  from
ores of different origin.  In addition to the heavy metals present in the
material at the time that it was tippjsd, additional contamination accumulated
at these sites from airborne particulate which contained heavy metals.
     Because the tips were located in ah area scheduled for regrading and
revegetation, the study was undertaken >to evaluate the effects of leaching on
the concentrations of phytotoxic metals in the rooting zone. The pH within the
tip profiles was measured and also the effect of pH on the extractable metals.
The mobility of metals in the tip profiles was assessed by measuring the
water-extractable fraction of the EDTA-extracted metals.  The data from this
study suggest that the weathering process and natural leaching produce zones
of enrichment of copper and zinc at depths within the root zone for'surface
vegetation (Chase and Wainwright, 1983, p. 144).
     The undisturbed site was covered
by patchy vegetation and, to a depth of
about 15 cm, contained living and partly decayed plant material.  Samples were
taken from two holes excavated 100 meters" apart in the fop of the tip to a
depth of 2 meters.  The second site we.s almost bare of vegetation and, samples
                                      157

-------
were taken from a freshly exposed face.  The investigators noted, "The bedding
planes produced by tipping in both tips were at a steep angle about 45 degrees
to the vertical, so there was no horizontal stratification of the tipped
material" (Chase and Wainwright, 1983, p. 135).  It was also noted that the
tips contain appreciable quantities (about 30 percent of dry weight) of coal
and coke.
     Surface accumulations of metals,  particularly lead,  found at both tips
were attributed to aerial fallout and possibly, at the undisturbed site, to
surface deposition of metal-contaminated plant litter.  For the undisturbed
tip the analyses showed low mobility of metals at the surface (probably due to
binding to organic matter).  A region of high mobility was present just below
the surface followed by a rapid decline with depth.  At the Plot 49 tip, the
mobility of copper and zinc decreased rapidly with depth.
     Similar profiles of copper, zinc and lead were found for both tips.  Also
a marked pH gradient was present at both tips, the pH increasing with depth.
Reducing the pH of suspensions of tip material was found to increase the
amounts of metals in solution.  At pH levels above about 4.0, the lead  •
remained in suspension (i.e., insoluble).  Copper and zinc remained in
suspension above pH values of 4.5 and 6.0, respectively.  This suggests that
metals mobilized by leaching water in the more acidic regions near the surface
could be redeposited farther down the profile where the pH was higher.  This
pH-dependent solubility (and mobility) explains the similar pattern of
extractable metals found in all the tip profiles.  For the Plot 35 tip, copper
levels in all six profiles tended to peak at a depth of about 40 cm where the
pH was about 4.6; zinc levels peaked at a depth of about 80 cm where the pH
was about 5.4.  It should be noted that below a depth of about 1.2 meters,
there was no similarity among the profiles indicating high variability in the
tipped wastes.  For the Plot 49 tip, the pH profile was found to be compressed
compared to Plot 35 (i.e, the pH decreased faster with depth).  For Plot 49
copper levels peaked at about 7 cm, and zinc at about 30 cm.
     Site Assessments at Upper Bank—Bridges, (1984c) evaluated the potential
for remote sensing techniques to detect material variations useful in the
assessment of contaminated land.  One aspect of the study focused on the Upper
Bank Tip site (12 hectares (29.6 acres) and an adjacent site.  A conventional
soil survey and site assessment as well as remote sensing analyses were
carried out.  Both sites were known to contain copper wastes, but from
different smelters (Bridges, 1984c, p. 31).  The data from this investigation
indicate the levels of heavy metals present in certain waste materials and the
complexity of site assessments due to the mixing of waste materials from
several locations on a single site.
                                      158

-------
     At the time of the investigation
                                      the subject site was inactive, but it
had been regraded and was bare of vegetation. One sample per hectare was taken
for chemical analyses.  Bridges  (1984c, pp. 31-32) noted that the point sample
approach enables one to make an overall estimate of the actual nature of the
                                     i:
contaminants on a site, and the probable level of certain elements.
Concentrations (ppm) were determined for total copper  (Cu), lead  (Pb), cadmium
(Cd),  zinc  (Zn),  and manganese  (Mn).  Seven of the 12 samples taken from the
site were found to contain potentially hazardous elements at levels exceeding
the guidelines used in the United Kingdom to describe contaminated land; the
remaining samples showed lower concentrations of the elements measured, but
still are considered to be poor quality materials (Bridges, 1984c, p. 29).
     Remote sensing data were obtained from an aircraft-mounted, 11-channel
multispectral scanner  (MSS) at a height of 305 meters  (1,000 feet);
simultaneous black and white photography was obtained  (Bridges, 1984c, p. 23) .
The MSS measures surface reflectance/emission characteristics  (e.g., color,
particle size, moisture content, and emissive qualities) and can be used to
map material differences.  The remote
                                      sensing data were interpreted in
conjunction with, the chemical analyses of point samples taken from the site..
     Color and texture variations were apparent at the soil surface,  and two
types of materials could be distinguished: material present on the site for
some time and fresh material brought to the site from elsewhere in the Valley
(Bridges, 1984c, p. 28).  It is expected that within some months the two types
of materials would probably be indistinguishable as the surfaces weather and
vegetation starts to appear.  Six types of surface material were classified
based on the MSS data.  Some 10 percent of the site remained unclassified.
     Assessment of the Eendrod Marsh—rThe Fendrod marsh area is the site of
the proposed Industrial Park Lake.  The 'nine hectare (22 acres) lake is to
provide flood control and will serve'an amenity function.
     The Nanty-Fendrod river transects the marsh area,  .and a zinc waste tip
lies adjacent to the marsh.  Drainage from this tip and leachate carried by
flood waters from other waste sites have polluted'the marsh (Davies,  R.L.,
1979, pp. 77,78).  Metal concentrations have accumulated in the marsh over a'
period of many years.
     To assess the extent of the contcmination,  samples were taken from the
main zinc waste tip adjacent to the marsh and from twelve boreholes in the
marsh material at depths down to three meters.
     Chemical analyses of samples taken from the Marsh revealed high zinc
levels in all samples taken from the southeast portion of the site, and high
cadmium levels were found in samples taken at or near the surface.  On the
basis of the data from the chemical analyses, it was concluded that there must
                                      159

-------
be a strong leaching process from the main tip.  Subsequent field studies
revealed a more complex pattern of contamination entering the .marsh (Bridges,
1984c, pp. 33-35).  The patterns of vegetation and soil differences in the
south area of the marsh indicated " a tongue of material some 200 m long and
50 m wide running out from the zinc tip in to the marsh" (Bridges, 1984c, p.
34).  After the area was drained in 1983, a profile of the marsh material
showed that the area was experiencing washing of the zinc waste from dumping
by the former Glamorgan Spelter Works which closed in 1907 (Bridges, 1984c, p.
34).  It is now believed that the marsh had functioned as a settlement lagoon
in which coarse, gritty material was laid down in horizontal layers.  It is
clear from the marsh sediment profile that contaminating material was
introduced during two separate time periods as a layer of natural sediment
separates the two zones of industrial waste.

Erosion—
      The natural soils of the Lower Swansea Valley are classified as sandy
clay loams characterized by strong acidity, low natural fertility, and low
organic content in other than the surface layers.  Before industrialization of
the Valley, the natural vegetation was the mixed oak-birch woodland seen
elsewhere in the Tawe and Neath Valleys.  But with industrial development came
severe air pollution that eventually took its toll on the vegetation in the
Valley.
      Most of the sulfur in the ores processed in the Valley was eventually
released as sulfur dioxide (SO2).   The sulfur gases and the metals fumes given
off during the roasting and smelting of copper and zinc ores were, in most
cases, discharged to the atmosphere.  (Sulfuric acid plants in later works
consumed substantial amounts of the SO2.)  The frequent inversions in the
valley left this air pollution stagnated for extended periods, eventually
killing off all vegetation in the vicinity.  The lack of a vegetative cover
and a rainfall of 1,250 mm (49 inches) per annum ultimately resulted in
extensive erosion over considerable areas.  The soil erosion did not end when
the industries in the Valley ceased to operate.  Natural revegetation was
hindered by the lack of organic matter in the exposed subsoil, and surface
layers were contaminated with heavy metals from fallout from the smelters or
from leaching waste piles.  It is known that revegetation is hindered by
copper, lead, zinc, and probably other phytotoxic elements.  Some of the areas
where serious erosion had taken place are shown in Figure 20.
      At the time of the initial Project investigations, severe soil loss had
occurred for all of the eastern side of the Valley and from a morainic mound
on the Valley floor (Bridges, 1984c, p. 23).  Vegetation within the Valley was

                                      160

-------
 surface layer of stones left behind a
 constituents.  Bridges and Harding (1
 in a small gully catchment (120 m nor
 Based on soil losses measured for the
 limited to the few species able to survive in the polluted environment.,  A few
 grasses and weeds grew on some open areas and on the less toxic inactive waste
 tips; trees were almost completely abpent in the Lower Swansea Valley
 (Lavender, 1979, p. 151).
       As a result of the erosion,  considerable areas were covered with a
:ter removal of the, finer soil
'71)  studied the extent of soil erosion
;h to south,, and 15 m east to west).
gently sloping interfluves,  the gully
 sides,  and the gully floor,  the researchers determined that about 60 g of soil
 per square m were washed out of the gully in one year (Bridges et al.,  1979,
 p.  25).
 Water Pollution—
       Stephen Bird (1983,  pp. 27-68)  <
 Lower Swansea Valley since 1965 based
liscussed trends  in water quality in the
 on data from the South West Wales River
 Authority and the Welsh Water Authority.   Bird concluded that'a marked
 improvement in the water quality has occurred since the early 1970's and
 attributed the improvement to more effective treatment of effluents discharged
.to the rivers.  Bird's report offers valuable insights into the pollutants of
 concern and the factors that influence water quality.   Quantitative data'
 regarding water quality in the Valley
prior  to  1965 were  not  available.
       The water quality of the river Tawe at Morriston Road Bridge is
 influenced by pollution sources upstream of the Lower Swansea Valley region.
 Water quality at this point suffers most during the summer low flows.
 Dissolved oxygen levels are lowered as a result of sewage pollution
 (attributed to inadequate treatment at two sewage treatment works which
 discharge into the Tawe).  When the dilution ratio of effluent to clean water
 is  too low,  odor problems and damage to the freshwater fauna may occur
 downstream (Bird,  1983,  p.  57).
       The water quality characteristics of the river Tawe at Landore are in-
 fluenced by the conditions  in the  Nant-y-Fendrod as this  point lies downstream
 of  the confluence of the two rivers.   In 1964,  the reported dissolved oxygen
 level was only 0.3 ppm in the river Tawe at Landore (Ledger,  1964).  This
 level is "inimical to any form of  fish, life"  (Davies,  R.L.  1979,  p. 79).
       The Nant-y-Pendrod,  a relatively small  river compared to the river Tawe,
 flows through the Enterprise Zone  within the  Lower Swansea Valley Project
 Area.   The water quality of the  Fendrod has long been affected by the past
 mining and manufacturing activity  within its  catchment.   The West Wales Water
 Authority have reported high levels of metals in the Fendrod—cadmium at 11
                                      L61

-------
ppm, lead at 37 ppm, and zinc at 38 ppm (Davies, R.L., 1979, p. 81).  Until
1971 the Pendrod served a sewage disposal function for the Rio Tinto Zinc
(RTZ) plant until 1974.  Bird (1983, p. 61 noted that levels of lead, zinc,
and cadmium were at unacceptably high levels in the Fendrod prior to 1974,
"due to the production of poor effluent at RTZ and erosion of nearby tips."
      Before 1973, mean annual pH levels in the Fendrod were acidic.  Reported
minimum pH levels, recorded during low flows, were 3.0 in 1971/1972 and 3.2 in
1965/1966 (Bird, 1983, ipp. 43, 44).  These acidic pH conditions were
accompanied by high ammonia and low dissolved oxygen.  Such conditions can be
highly detrimental to the aquatic ecosystems.  In 8 of the first 10 years of
record, minimum values of dissolved oxygen in the Fendrod reached zero,
indicating "septic conditions with a completely anaerobic river, producing an
odor nuisance, putrefaction and mass destruction of any healthy aquatic
organisms" (Bird, 1983, p. 43).  Since 1976 conditions have improved although
minimum values of dissolved oxygen tend to lie below 60 percent.  The mean
levels of dissolved oxygen in 1983 were about 20 percent lower than those in
the upper Tawe catchment  (Bird, 1983, p. 43).

Other Problems—
      Bridges (1983-1984, p. 22) noted that, "Virtually all the metallurgical .
activity  (in the Lower Swansea Valley) had ceased before air photography was
developed to the point where it could be considered useful.  It was not
possible to follow the development and disuse of buildings as has been done on
sites with a more recent occupation by the polluting industry."  The lack of
knowledge concerning the exact locations of past industry-related operations
can complicate site assessments and remedial action planning.  Contingency
procedures and precautions are necessary to avoid hazards to workers during
site clearance and remediation.  One conclusion from the 1960's studies on
geology, soil mechanics, and foundation engineering pertained to the extensive
underground workings in the area that could give rise to problems during  site
remediation and construction  (Bridges, 1984, p. 17).  It was recommended  that
the exact location of old adits, shafts, and air vents should be mapped prior
to construction work at a site.  Another concern was the possibility of
subsidence if old flooded workings were to be pumped dry.
Revegetation

       In  the  early  1960's  it was  thought  too  expensive to remove the many  slag
heaps.  Thus  efforts were  directed to  improving  the appearance of  the Valley
by planting trees and  grasses  that would  provide a visually pleasing ground

                                      162

-------
 cover.   Such planting would also help
 planting with  volunteer labor  has tak
 eroded  soils within the Project  Area
Larch  (a deciduous  evergreen), Lodgej
 with erosion control.   Since 1962,  tree
en place annually on the contaminated,
(Bridges et al.,  1979,  p. 25).
       In  the  tree  planting program implemented  in  1962  to  1964,  it  was  decided
 to plant  mainly  conifers  because  of tieir  rapid growth  and tolerance  of poor
 environmental conditions.   The most siccessful  plantings proved  to  be Japanese
>le Pine,  and birch.   Three large plots
were planted  (after  liming  and  fertilizing  to  encourage  rooting) by  the
Forestry Commission.   Smaller plots  scattered  throughout the Valley  were
planted by the Forest  Officer.  The  young trees had  to contend with  many
problems to survive—poor soils contaminated with heavy  metals, weeds, damage
by small animals, air pollution—but
:he 'most serious threats were vandalism
and fire.
      After the work of the Lower Swansea Valley Project was concluded, the
appointment in 1968 of a Conservator  for the Valley helped to  insure
continuity "in the planting and nurturing of trees.  The Conservator's task was
"to care for and promote interest in  the flora and fauna of the Valley and to
stimulate local participation in any  improvements of the environment that were
undertaken" (Lavender, 1979, p. 153).
involving local people, especially sc!
Involvement of the local young people
  The  Conservator was  instrumental in
100! children,  in planting trees.
 in the  nurturing of the  trees  proved to
be the most effective counter to vandalism  (Lavender, 1979, p. 154).  The
Conservator reported that in 1978, "there were almost 450,000 trees in the
Lower Swansea Valley, including more than 200,000 trees planted on 71 ha  (175
acres) of land leased to the Forestry Commission  (Lavender, 1979, p. 155).
The many trees growing on land owned by the Swansea City Council are insured
against fire risk  (Meller, 1979, p. 174).
      Certain eroded areas in the Valley were sown with grass, but this effort
was less successful than the tree planting scheme (Bridges, 1984a, pp. 19-20).
The use of amendments such as sewage sludge, domestic refuse, pulverized fuel
ash and inorganic fertilizers was investigated to evaluate different schemes
for revegetation (Bridges, 1984a, p. 29).
      Work accomplished under the initial Lower Swansea Valley Project proved
possible the successful establishment
of certain trees and grass  leys on
eroded clay loams and on some types of steel wastes (e.g., coal shale, furnace
slag, foundry sand, and domestic wastes).  It was recognized that the
revegetation of the copper and, more particularly, the zinc slag tips presents
a more difficult problem.
                                      163

-------
      In 1979, large quantities of a metal tolerant grass seed called "merlin"
became available from the National Seed Development Organization.  A variety
of Festuca rubra, merlin was reported to show acceptable growth on zinc waste
if lime and nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium (N.P.K.) were given (Bridges et
al., 1979,  p. 35-39).                                         •
      Little was known at the time the plantings were begun of the physico-
chemical factors that control uptake of heavy metals by plants, so
experimental, work was needed to discover the most appropriate species and
soil-conditioning techniques to facilitate revegetation.  An investigation of
biogeochemical cycling of metals taken up by trees was undertaken in 1974
(Bridges, 1984, p. 29}.

Local Authority Land Acquisition

      At the time of the Lower Swansea Valley Project, land in the Valley was
held by many private landowners.  It was recognized that unification of
ownership by the local authority was essential for the reclamation and
redevelopment of the Valley.  Ironically, the first opportunity for land
purchases by the Swansea County Borough Council arose out of the need for
sites for disposal of municipal refuse.  Five derelict sites within the
Project Area were identified as suitable sites for controlled tipping, and
negotiations to buy the land were begun  (Morris, 1979, p. 185).  In 1964, the
City Estate Agent advised the Town Clerk that owners of three contiguous
properties, over 24 hectares  (59.3 acres), were prepared to negotiate to sell.
Aware of the Project research then in progress, the Estate Agent noted in a
memorandum to the Council dated June 19, 1964 that—
      "It is the Council which will have to take the lead in the
      rehabilitation of the  (Project) area.  The Council would be in a far
      better position to require rehabilitation if it were a major landowner.
      On this basis now is the time for the Council to acquire lands in the
      area."

      In fact, no new refuse tips were created in the  Project Area, but the
properties were acquired.  Thus began the deliberate acquisition of derelict
land in the Lower Swansea Valley by the Swansea County Borough Council.
Following the local government reorganization in 1974, the Swansea City
Council continued the policy of land assembly initiated by the Borough Council
 (Meller, 1979, p. 165).  The acquisition of the various parcels was achieved
with a minimal use of compulsory powers.  Rather, the  purchases were
implemented through quiet but determined negotiations.
                                      164

-------
      In the period 1966-1969, several
 major purchases were completed bringing
the Council's land, holdings to 270 hectares  (almost 670 acres).  Council land
acquisitions in and adjacent to the Project Area totaled 390.3 hectares  (964.5
acres) by the end  of 1978  (Morris, 1979, p. 183) .  By 1983', the only
substantial land area in the Valley ndt acquired by the 'Council was the
British Steel Corporation property located within the Enterprise Zone.
Negotiations were  in progress in 1983 for some of this land and for parcels
owned by Cohen and Bird just outside the Enterprise Zone (Bromley and Morgan,
1983, pp. 17, 23).  Figure 21 shows the extent of the Council's land
acquisitions and the properties sold following site reclamation.  Table 10
lists the lands purchased by the Local Authority 1965-1982 and the costs.  The
property codes in Figure 21 are keyed
Table 10.
      Almost all finance for the land
to the specific properties listed in
purchases shown in Figure 21 was raised
several instances, the necessary Loan
that a commitment was needed to conclude the property transfer.  In such
cases, the City Treasurer made special
a temporary basis.  The important poii
by loan from Central Government, repayable over a period of 60 years  (Morris,
1979, p. 183).  These loans required the consent of the Welsh Office.  In
Consent was not yet granted at the time
 arrangements to fund the transaction on
  is that the transaction was not
jeopardized or stalled because of approval delays during a period of general
financial constraints.
      After establishment of the Welsn Development Agency (WDA) in 1976, 100
percent grant-aid was awarded toward several approved reclamation schemes,
including the cost of land purchase and administrative costs.  The WDA grant-
aid was particularly important in securing and reclaiming the former Swansea
Vale Works site, now known as the RTZ site.

Site Remediation and Redevelopment

      Prior to 1966, some cleanup efforts were undertaken by the University
College, and some ruined buildings were demolished by the Territorial Army as
training exercises  (Bridges, 1984a, p.
initiatives, however, no significant r
Valley until financial assistance became available from Central Government in
1966 (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 75).             '
      In 1966, Swansea was designated a Development Area under the Industrial
Development Act.  This qualified the Valley for financial assistance from
Central Government to reclaim derelict
contributed in some way to industrial
 12).  . Except for the tree planting
eclamation was accomplished in the
 land,  providing that the reclamation
development.  (The real motive behind
                                      165

-------
   Land  purchased  by
    Swansea  Council
 i  i i i  i Railways
                                    Before 1966

                                    1966-1969
                                    1970-1973

                                    1974-1977
                                    1978 onwards
                  Land held by LAW and SCC under
                  1981 Deed of  Partnership
                     Land sold by Swansea Councit
Figure 21.  Land acquisition by the local authority 1965-1982.

                (Source:  Bromley and Morgan,  1983, p. 18)

                       166

-------
              TABLE 10.  LAND ACQUISITION BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY 1965-1982
 Site
 Code
 Property  Name,
 Area,  Cost
                                            Date of Purchase,  Vendor,  and Disposal
B


C



D
K
 Land  at Middle
 and Upper  Bank
 (16.2 ha)
 £14,000  ($39,074)

 White Rock Works
 (3.7 ha) £3,800  ($10,606)

 Land at Upper
 Bank  (8.6  ha)
 £1,500  ($4,184)

 Upper Forest
 and Worcester
 Works (30.4 ha)
 £100,000  ($240,670)

 Duffryn Steel Works
 and Tinplate Works
 and Rose Works Tip
 and Land at Plasmarl
 (61.5 ha)
 £102,500  ($246,687)

 White Rock Tip and  '
 Land at Kilvey
 Hill  (49.1 .ha)
 £5,500  ($13,164)

 Land at Winsh Wen,
 Bonymaen,  and Upper
 Bank  (99.6 ha)
 £72,500 ($173,529)  .

 Morfa Works,
 Landore (6.3 ha)
 £8,000  ($19,554)
Land at Upper Bank
and Pentrechwyth
Road (4.9 ha)

Land at Morfa
(14.7 ha),
plus land exchange

Land at Aber Works
(3.7 ha)
£19,250  ($47,050)
                                            Fe'b.  1965 from Yorkshire Imperial
                                            Metals Ltd.;  2.2 ha sold Nov.  1965
                                            to Addis Ltd.,  £8,000 ($22,328).
May 1965 from Vivians White Rock Ltd.


Mar. 1966 from Principality Property Co.
(Swansea) Ltd.
                                            Mar.  1967  from Richard Thomas and
                                            Baldwins Ltd.;  16.2  ha sold Jul.
                                            1968  to Morgan Crucible Co.  Ltd.,
                                            £97,500  ($233,366).

                                            Apr.  1967  from The Somerset  Trust;
                                            some  land  under lease;  7.2.  ha
                                            sold  Aug 1972  to Board of  Trade,
                                           '£85,000  ($212,568).
                                           Jul.  1968  from Vivians  White  Rock Ltd.
                                           Nov.  1968  from  Principality  Property
                                           Co.  (Swansea) Ltd.;  four  small  sites
                                           later sold.
                                           Mar. 1971  from the Marquess of
                                           Cambridge  and others; some land
                                           transferred to Yorkshire  Imperial
                                           Metals in  exchange for land at Morfa  (see
                                           J); small  site later sold.

                                           Dec. 1969  from Aeron Thomas and Son
                                           Ltd; some  land later sold.
                                           £5,000 ($11,968)

                                           Oct. 1970  from Yorkshire  Imperial
                                           Metals.  £8,000  ($19,167)                >
                                           Mar. 1971 from S.A. Lowe & Davies
                                           Middleton & Davies Ltd.
                                                                            (continued)
                                          167

-------
                                  TABLE 10  (continued)
Site
Code
Property Name,
Area, Cost
Date of Purchase, Vendor, and Disppsal
M
N
P


Q
Glandwr Works
(2.3 ha)
£75,000 ($183,315)

Land at Plasmarl
and Mannesman
(includes Rose and
Spelter Works and
Cohen's Land) (19.9 ha)
£22,500 ($54,995)

Land at Nantyffin
Road (1.0 ha)
400 ($978)

Land at Upper Bank
(8.1 ha)
Exchange for license at
£6,250  ($15,276)

British Rail Land
(Part of large land deal)

Swansea Vale Works,
Llansamlet (52.5 ha)
(known as RTZ)
Cost cannot be published.

Glamorgan Works
(2.5 ha)
Cost cannot be published.

Land at Samlet Road,
Llansamlet (4.2 ha)
Cost cannot be published.

Land at Samlet Road,
Llansamlet (1.1 ha)
Cost cannot be published.
                                           Mar. 1971 from McThomas Esq. and others
Mar. 1971 from Western Metalurgical
Industries Ltd (George Cohen Ltd);
4 ha sold Aug. 1978 to Gregor Bros.
Ltd.
Mar. 1971 from Estateways Builders
Ltd.
                                           Oct.  1971  from R. Parkhouse and Sons.
Mar. 1972 from British Rail.
Oct. 1974 from RTZ Estates, Ltd. and
Imperial Smelting Corp Ltd.
                                           Jul.  1975  from M. Davies and H Davies.
                                            (Acquired  by Compulsory Purchase
                                           Order.)

                                           Sept.  1975 from William Tomkins.
                                           1979-1982 Compulsory  Purchase Orders
                                           on six properties.
Source: Information from Bromley and Morgan, 1983, pp.17-23;  Meller, 1979, p. 172;
and Morris, 1979, pp. 185-9.
                                          168

-------
this program was the development of industries to provide jobs in economically
depressed areas.)  Grant aid amounting to 85 percent of the net cost was
available for qualifying sites, net cost being defined as the cost of land
purchase and reclamation less the after value of the site (Bromley and Morgan,
1983, p. 23).                        I    .
     Most of the capital expenditure in the Lower Swansea Valley has derived
from Central Government grants, and the availability of these grants has, to a
large extent, determined the progress
                                     I
of redevelopment in the Valley  (Bromley
 all the reclamation efforts have been
and Morgan, 1983, p. 23).  Since 1966
administered and supervised by the Local Authority (i.e., the Swansea County
Borough Council  [which became the Swansea City Council in 1969] until 1974,
and the Swansea City Council, thereafter.  Most of the reclamation work has
been performed by outside contractors
     Bromley and Morgan (1983, p. 82)
determined the particular sequence of
noted three principal factors that have
reclamation schemes in the Lower Swansea
Valley.  These are: 1) land ownership, 2) site accessibility, and 3) the
interest of prospective developers.  Of these factors, site ownership was
clearly the most significant.  In order to obtain grant aid for reclamation
from the Welsh Office Derelict Land Unit, it was necessary for the Local
Authority to 'own the subject propertyL  Thus, the progress of reclamation in
the Valley was dependent upon securing financial assistance to enable the
Local Authority to purchase specific properties.  Successful negotiation with
the owners of the derelict or contaminated Valley properties was a crucial
step in this process for, although the Council had authority to seek
compulsory purchase orders if necessary, this involved a lengthy legal process
and was best avoided if possible.
     The problem of site accessibility
 arose due to the large number of tips
which stood "cheek-to-jowl" on the Vai.ley floor and the lack of adequate roads
to allow heavy equipment access to sites in the central areas of the Valley
(Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 82).  The earliest reclamation schemes were
implemented on the periphery of the Project Area.  Access to the central areas
gradually improved as reclamation and
infrastructure projects proceeded.
Clearance and improvement schemes undertaken by the Local Authority are listed
in Table 11.  The locations of these various reclamation sites are shown in
Figure 22.  The site codes in Figure 22 are keyed to sites named in Table 11.
     Most of the reclamation efforts were initiated without the interest of a
specific prospective developer.  One fortunate exception to this was the
reclamation and site improvements which were completed at the Upper Forest and
Worcester Works' site specifically for the Morgan Crucible Company for the
planned Morganite Complex.  The White
Rock Tip was acquired by the Council for
                                      169

-------
       TABLE  1,1.   RECLAMATION AND CLEARANCE SCHEMES IN THE LOWER SWANSEA VALLEY
Map
              Site
                                       Area
                                     (hectares)
                    Dates of Work.
D

E



F

G


H

I

J

K

L



M

N

O
R
White Rock Tip
Clearance, Borrow for
Morganite Site (See B) •

Upper Forest and
Worcester Works
Clearance and filling
(Borrow from White Rock Tip)

Cwm, Winsh Wen, and
Llansamlet

Dyffryn Steel Works

Swansea Canal drainage
and filling
(Borrow from Morfa I)

Morfa I (see E)

Plasmarl: Cohen Land and
Graig Brickworks

Rose and Spelter Works

Morfa II

RTZ I

Glamorgan Works

RTZ II
(Including construction
of culvert)

RTZ III & IV, Phase I

Morriston Lower Gas Works

Upper Bank, Phase I
Reclamation and laying
sewer

RTZ III & IV
Reclamation of site 6
and Culvert on Site 4;
Borrow from Q and R

Glandwr/Morfa
Borrow for Site 6
(See P)

Upper Bank, Phase II
Some borrow for
Site 6 (See P)

Enterprise Zone,  Site 8c
and Site 14
  33



  16




 104


   8

   4
  16

   2

 3.5

 0.5

 5.5



24.5

  13

 8.5



 8.3




10.4



  15
1967 - Nov. 68



Apr 67- - Dec 68




Jan. 69 - Jan. 70


Oct. 69 - Jul. 70

Aug. 70 - Dec. 71



Nov. 70 - Dec. 71

Feb. 72 - Feb. 74:


Feb. 74 - Mar. 75

Jun. 74 - Jan. 75

Oct. 74 - Jun. 75

Apr. 75 - Jun. 75

Nov. 76 - Sept. 77



Apr. 78 - Dec. 79

Oct. 78 - Mar. 80

Feb. 80 - May 80



Oct. 80 - Apr. 82




Oct. 80 - Apr. 82



Nov. 81 - Apr. 82



Jan. 82 - Mar. 82
                                          170

-------
   Reclamation Schemes
Figure 22.   Reclamation  sites  in the Lower Swansea Valley.




                 (Source:   Bronley and Morgan, 1983, p. 81)




                             171

-------
the purpose of providing the borrow material needed for site improvements at
the future Morganite site.  Another instance where reclamation was undertaken
for a specific intended reuse was the Pentre Hafod Tip; after clearance of the
tip, the Pentrehafod School was constructed on the site.
           One goal of  the reclamation program has  been to  provide  "attractive
sites and/or premises for incoming industrialists".  By 1979, the Council had
conveyed land to three companies—Addis, Morganite, and Siliconix—for
development and had also created new industrial estates at Morfa, Plasmarl,
Nantyffin North and Nantyffin South.  Addis Ltd. was the first major new
manufacturer attracted to the Valley; in 1965 the .company purchased from the
Council the 8,500 square meter  (91,500 square foot) former Government
munitions factory on the east bank of the river Tawe and 5.5 hectares  (13.6
acres) of adjacent land at the Middle Bank site at Pentrechwyth.  Addis
improved the existing building and began manufacturing plastic brushes and
household plastic goods, providing more than 100 new manufacturing jobs in the
Valley.

Reclamation and Site Improvement Efforts 1966 to 1974—
           When reclamation efforts  were initiated by  the County Borough,  the
policy was "not only to clear derelict land, but also to return -the land to
active use and encourage new and modern industry to the area"  (Ward, 1979, p.
249).  The Council began to implement this policy as soon as the Welsh Office
grants became available in 1966.  By 1974, the Council had acquired some 330
hectares (815 acres) of land in and adjacent to the Project Area; the
reclamation programs were substantially complete for 172 hectares  (425 acres);
the Morganite factory, a major new industry, had begun operation on one
reclaimed site; and the Pentrehafod School was built on the site formerly
covered by the Pentre-Hafod copper waste tip.  Several infrastructure schemes
(road building, culverts, sewers, water supplies, utilities) were completed
during this period providing the basis for redevelopment at other sites.  The
projects carried out during the.period 1966-1974 involved an expenditure of
more than £1.5 million  ($3.67 million U.S.) including grant-aid totalling
£793,282 ($1.9 million) from the Welsh Office and other sources  (Meller, 1979,
p. 166).  These projects are described below.
     White Rock Tip—The first formal award of grant-aid from the Welsh Office
was for the reclamation of the White Rock Tip  (Elias, 1979, p. 209) .  This
barren 33 hectare  (81.5 acre) site on the eastern slope at Pentrechwyth had
been worked for hard core.  It was described by Morris  (1979, p. 187) as "one
of the principal eyesores in the Valley."  Though actually outside the Valley
floor, the huge tip dominated the principal north-south highway to the east

                                      172

-------
 side of the Valley.   In July 1968,  the
 acres)of open mountain land on Kilvey
                                   tip plus  nearly  41 hectares  (101
                                  Hill were  purchased by  the  Council.
      Clearance  of  the  White Rock Tip was  linked to improvements  at the Upper
 Forest and Worcester Works' site located  north of the A48 highway, so removal
 of the copper tip  began even before thk land purchase was complete.  Some
 183,000 cubic meters (239,346 cubic yards)  of copper slag waste  (Jones, 1979,
 p.  194),  were excavated from the White
 Morganite site to raise the level of tie land there (see discussion below).
 The  clearance was completed in November 1968 (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p.
 77).
                                 purchase)
Cost (reclamation plus land
Welsh Office grant-aid:  £109,829
(Reference:  Elias, 1979, p. 210)
                                  Rock Tip and moved to the  future
      £129,210  ($309,264)
($262,876)
     Following removal of the White Rock Tip, the area was  landscaped, and
most of  the  land,  together with the Kilvey  Hill  land was  leased to the
Forestry Commission  in 1969  for afforestation. Some  120,000 trees  have been
planted  on this  land which is treated  as a  working forest;  in  due  course  it is
expected to  yield  a  crop of  timber.
     Clearance of  the White  Rock Tip drastically improved the  appearance  of
the area although  the revegetation scheme at'the site was not  entirely
successful.   In  1979, the site  was described as, "now vastly better than  it
was when a copper  slag wasteland, but  sparseness of  grass,  yellow  for most  of
the year, the gullying of the soil cover and the stone covered surface, is
less than perfect  in appearance."  (Humplprys, 1979, p. 282) .
     Upper Forest and Worcester Works-JThis 30.41 hectare (75  acre)  site  on
the north side of  A48 near Wychtree Bridge was purchased by the  Council in
March 1967.  Even before the purchase v
the sale of more than-half the land to
                                  ras completed, the Council arranged for
                                  the Morgan Crucible Company, Ltd.  The
land transfer was to take place following completion of the site improvements
that-included demolition and clearance
a new road alongside the site, raising
the risk of flooding, and installation
station (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, pp.
of borrow material for the site work w«
                                  of existing structures, construction of
                                  the level of the whole area to remove
                                  of sewers and a surface water pumping
                                  77, 84).  More than 300,000 metric tons
                                  re brought from the White Rock copper
waste tip (Ward, 1979, p. 249).  The cri>st of the reclamation plus land
purchase totalled:  £295,391  ($708,997).  Welsh Office grant-aid £166,082
($398,630).   The after value of the laiid was estimated to be £100,000
($240,020).  (Elias, 1979, p. 210.)
                                      173

-------
     Infrastructure: roads, sewers, pumping station
     Cost (infrastructure):  £141,615 ($339,900)
     Welsh Office grant-aid:  £141,615 ($339,900)
     Reference: Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 84.

     The Morganite factory and office complex were established in 1976 on the
site.  The site is conveniently near to Morriston Town Center and bus services
and is the largest single  firm in the Valley  (Humphrys et al., 1979, p. 239).
The Morganite factory produces carbon brushes for electrical motors and trans-
formers  (Humphrys et al.,  1979, p. 230).
     Cwm, Winsh Wen, and Llansamlet—In 1969 and 1970, 104 hectares (257
acres) of spoil heaps and  quarries were reclaimed on the eastern slopes of the
Project Area at Cwm, Winsh Wen, and Llansamlet; 65,000 cubic meters (85,014
cubic yards) of material were excavated at these sites at a cost of £30,447
($73,016) (Ward, 1979, p.  249; Jones, 1979, p. 194; Bromley and Morgan, 1983,
p. 77).  The properties were scheduled for amenity and industrial use
following clearance  (Jones, 1979, p. 194).  Some housing was also present in,
the area, and additional housing was planned.
     Cost (reclamation plus land purchase):  £109,289 ($262,091),
     After value of land:  not considered
     Welsh Office grant-aid:  £92,896 ($222,779)
     Reference: Elias, 1979, p. 210.

     More than 13,000 trees had been planted at Cwm during 1964 and 1965, even
before the Council acquired the land  (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 95).
Additional trees were planted, some 27,000 at Cwm and more than 37,000 at
Winsh Wen, between 1971 and 1974  (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 95).  These
trees form an amenity screen between the  existing and new industrial land, and
the adjoining residential  areas  (Ward, 1979, p. 249).
     Dyffryn Steel Works—The Dyffryn Steel Works site along with other land
was acquired by the Council in 1967.  The steel works site lies immediately
south of the A48 in Morriston.  Clearance of  the 8 hectare (19.8 acre) site,
begun in October 1969 and  completed in July 1970, involved the excavation of
approximately 50,000 cubic meters  (65,400 cubic yards) of material  (Bromley
and Morgan, 1983, p. 77; Jones, 1979, p.  194).  The former steel works site  is
scheduled for industrial development and has  been acquired by the Welsh
Development Agency  (Ward,  1979, p. 249).
     Cost (reclamation plus land purchase):   £154,732 ($371,357)
     After value of land:   £85,000  ($204,000)
     Welsh Office grant-aid:   £9,272 ($142,253)
     Reference: Elias, 1979, p. 210.
                                      174

-------
      Swansea Canal--Tn 1970-1971, the
                                        Swansea Canal,-which ran for seven kilo-
 meters  (4.3 miles) along the western boundary of the Project Area, was  drained
 and filled in 1970-1971  (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 77).  Borrow material
 for filling the canal was brought from the Morfa Tip (Bromley and Morgan,
 1983, p. 77).  Excavations involved 183,000 cubic meters  (239,345 cubic yards)
 of, material (Jones, 1979, p. 194).  SJ>me 11 hectares (27 acres) of land were
 reclaimed (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 77).  Grant aid for this work was pro-
 vided by the Welsh Office and the British Waterways Board.  In 1979 the canal
 route was used for a new highway constructed by the West Glamorgan County
 Council (Ward,  1979,  p. 249).
                                              £162,569 ($397,806)
      Cost (reclamation plus land purchase):
      After ,value of land:  £100 ($245)|
      Welsh Office grant-aid:  (£118,099,)  ($288,988)
      British Waterways Board grant-aid:  (£20,000)  ($48,940)
      O«f AV*^S«1 >••< A *•« . T3n J.«.~_  -1 f\1 f\  _   A .4 A  	   _      _     *    *
      References:  Elias,  1979,  p.  210;
                                       Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 77.
     Morfa  Tip—In  1970-1971  the clearance of the copper waste tip at the
Morfa Works  site (located on the west
Landore Viaduct)  was begun,  providing
Canal (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p.  77
1975.
Industrial Estate.
                                       bank of the river Tawe, south of the
                                       borrow material for filling the Swansea
                                       ).  A sizable Welsh Office Grant (See
 discussion under Swansea Canal) was provided for this operation.  Additional
 reclamation work at the Morfa site was carried out by the new Council in 1974-
        The reclaimed Morfa site was ultimately redeveloped as the Morfa
                     Infrastructure.schemes' including roads, sewers, and
utilities were completed between  1971 and  1973 at  a  cost  of  £53,497  ($132,270)
(Bromley and Morgan,  1983, p. 84).  Thks work was  accomplished without  grant-
aid.   (See discussion of later efforts
 (12.4 acres) at the Graig Brickworks s
                                        under Morfa II.)
     Graig Brickworks and Cohen Land at Plasmarl—Reclamation of 3 hectares
                                       Ite was undertaken in early 1972 and
involved excavation of some-42,000 cubic meters  (almost 55,000 cubic yards)
(Jones, 1979, p. 194).
     Borrow material from the adjacent
                                       Rose and Spelter  site was  used to raise
the level of the Cohen's Land.  Following reclamation, the sites were
scheduled  for use as amenity and housing  (Jones,  1979,  p.  194)
                                             £32,562  ($81,000)
                                     T
     Cost (reclamation plus land purchase):
     After value ofland:  £22,000 ($55JOOO)
     Welsh Office grant-aid:  £8,978 ($'22,450)
     Reference:  Elias,  1979, p.  210.
                                     Rose
     Rose Works Tip at Plasmarl—The
was acquired by the Council along with
Arrangements were made later to acquire
   Works Tip (copper smelting waste)
the Dyffryn Steel Works in 1967.
 several hectares of land at Upper Bank
                                     175

-------
from a hardcore contractor in exchange for the right to remove hardcore from
the Rose Tip.  This removal work ended in 1973 (Morris, 1979, p. 188).
Clearance of the tip site, which is located adjacent to the southern boundary
of the Rose and Spelter Works, was accomplished before 1974.
     Redevelopment of the Rose Tip proceeded along with that of the Rose and
Spelter Works site which was cleared in 1974 and 1975.  The Plasmarl
Industrial Estate was developed on these sites. See discussion under Rose and
Spelter Works.
     Pentre-Hafod Tip--The 5 hectare (12.5 acre)  Pentre-Hafod Tip  (copper
smelter waste) was located on open land adjoining Neath Road on the western
periphery of the Project Area.  In 1972 the reclamation scheme for the site
was approved  (Elias, 1973, p. 209).  The excavation of 112,000 cubic meters
 (146,485 cubic yards) of copper waste was completed in 1973  (Jones, 1979, p.
194). The construction of the Pentrehafod Secondary Comprehensive  School was
begun in 1973.  At the 1979 conference on the Lower Swansea Valley, Dr
Humphrys noted, "Perhaps the greatest success in the western area  has been
achieved in the clearance of the Pentre Hafod Tip and  its replacement by the
Pentrehafod Comprehensive School complex"  (Humphrys, 1979, p.  282).
     Cost (reclamation plus land purchase):  £403,616  ($989,000).
     After value of land:  £185,000  ($453,500)
     Welsh Office grant-aid:  £185,824  ($455,455)
     Reference: Elias, 1979, p. 210.

Reclamation  and Redevelopment  1974-1985—
     With local government reorganization  in 1974, the responsibilities of  the
 Swansea City Council passed  to the Swansea District Authority  (which  was
permitted to use  the designation  Swansea  City  Council) and  the West Glamorgan
 County  Council  (Morris,  1979,  p.  190).  Under  the  new organization, derelict
 land clearance can be  undertaken  by either government  body.   In practice,  the
 City Council has  continued the program of reclamation begun by the former
 Borough Council.   By  1974 most of the derelict sites  were already in  the
 ownership of the  Council.
      The City Council  has  committed to  further promotion  of the area  by
 appointing  an Industrial Development Officer and has  budgeted funding for
 industrial  promotion (Mailer,  1979,  p.  178).   The Council also provided for
 construction of  unit factories at the Morfa Industrial Estate and at  four
 sites within the Enterprise Zone.  By June 1982,  the  Council had completed 61
 factory units providing a total of 6,474 square meters (69,684 square feet) of
 floor space (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p. 93).  The emphasis of the County
 investment in the Valley has been on, "developing and strengthening the social
 infrastructure of -the Valley communities"  (Rush,  1979, p. 201).

                                      176

-------
      In 1976,  the Welsh Development Agency (WDA)  was made a separate office
 and assumed the functions previously sjerved by the Derelict Land Office within
 the Welsh Office.  The WDA was authorijzed to offer 100 percent grant-aid on '
 approved reclamation schemes (Bromley and Morgan, 1983,  p. 23).  The WDA
 grants have funded a large portion of
             the reclamation projects since 1976.
     Since  1974  a.  great  deal  has  been accomplished in revitalizing the Lower
 Swansea Valley;  the efforts encompass clearance and reclamation,
 infrastructure,  landscaping and amenity planting,  and,  as mentioned above,
 industrial  promotion.  The planning schemes described previously  have, for the
 most part,  guided  the  redevelopment prbgram.   Some of the projects carried out
 between 1974  and 1983  are described below.
     Rose and Spelter Works—Clearance
the Valley  floor  at  Plasmarl was  begun
              of  this  16  hectare  (39.5  acres)  site on
              in  February 1974 (Bromley and Morgan,
 1983, p. 78).  The  350,000  cubic meters  (457,765  cubic yards)  of material
 (Jones, 1979, p.  194)  excavated from the  site were used  to  raise the level of
 the adjacent Cohen's  land site  (Bromleir and Morgan,  1983, p. 76)  and in the
 construction of the Morriston bypass (M4)  (Morris, 1979, p.  188).   The
 clearance of the  Rose and Spelter Works was.accomplished without grant-aid
 (Meller, 1979, p. 166).  Following clearance of the  site, roads,  sewers,  and
 utilities were completed in early 1978    Grant-aid for roads and sewer
 construction was  provided by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)  and
 the Local Employment  Act (LEA)  (Bromlel and Morgan,  1983, p. 85).
     The site of the  former Rose and Spelter Works was redeveloped,  together
with the smaller  Rose  Tip site to the south, as the  Plasmarl Industrial  Estate
with the first industrial establishments  beginning operation there  in 1978.
The industrial sites  on offer at the Plasmarl Estate are intended for concerns
that require a fairly large site area
landscaping at the Plasmarl Industrial
between 1978 and 1981.  A summary of the costs incurred in reclamation and
redevelopment of the site follows:
     Cost (clearance)  £105/445 ($246,515)
     Grant-aid:   none
     Cost (infrastructure):   .£139,081 ($254,773)
     ERDF and LEA Grant-aid:  £54,439 ($109,597)
     Cost (landscaping):
     Grant-aid:  none
     Total expenditures:
£65,142 ($135
,547)
£309,668 ($636,835)
     References:  Meller,  1979,  p.  166;
             Bromley and Morgan,  1983, pp. 85, 97.
             Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p.  129) .  The
             Estate was carried out in two stages

-------
     The Plasmarl Industrial Estate lies within the Enterprise Zone which came
into operation in 1981.  In 1981, twelve establishments employing a total of
almost 200 workers were located in the Plasmarl Estate (Bromley and Morgan,
1983, pp. 130,131).
     Morfa II—Clearance of the Morfa Tip was begun in 1970 to provide fill
material for the Swansea Canal.  A second phase of the reclamation of Morfa
land was carried out in 1974-1975  (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 78).  The
reclamation at Morfa involved a total excavation of 63,000 cubic meters
(82,400 cubic yards) of material  (Jones, 1979, p. 194).  Roads and sewers were
constructed between July 1974 and March 1980, and services  (electricity and
water) were provided in 1979-1980 as part of the Morfa Industrial Estate
redevelopment  (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, pp. 85-7).  A summary of costs and
grant-aid follows—
     Cost (reclamation):  £110,204 ($251,370)
     Welsh Office grant-aid:  £13,044 ($29,753)
     Reference:  Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 78.
     Cost (infrastructure):  £42,640 ($88,394)
     ERDF grant-aid:  £11,268  ($22,685)
     LEA grant-aid:  £5,607  ($11,288)
     Reference:  Bromley and Morgan, 1983, pp. 85-7.

     The Morfa Industrial Estate was the site of the first  industrial
landscaping  scheme  in  the Lower  Swansea Valley  (Bromley  and Morgan,  1983,  p.
94), and it  was  more limited than some  of  the  later schemes.  The  landscaping
at  Morfa involved provision of a broad  grassed area between the  industrial
plots  and the  river Tawe, and  a  narrow  landscaped  belt by the roads.   This
landscaping  work was completed in 1977  (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p.  97).
     In 1978 the City  Council  provided  for construction  of  eight small factory
units  at the Morfa Industrial  Estate at a cost of  nearly €76,000  ($145,000)
 (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p.  94).  The construction of  the Morfa  Bridge in
1980 at a cost of £47,500  ($111,815) also contributed to redevelopment of the
Morfa  area.   The WDA provided grant-aid (50  percent)  for the bridge
construction (Bromley  and Morgan, 1983, p. 87).
     Glamorgan Works—The  2.3  hectares  (5.7  acres)  Glamorgan Works site was
acquired by the Council in July 1975 by Compulsory Purchase Order.  At the
 time,  the very ugly building known as  the Glamorgan Works was used for a scrap
metal business  (Morris,  1979,  p. 189).   Clearance of the site involving about
 0.5 hectare (1.2 acres)  was completed in 1975 without grant-aid.  The cost of
 the site clearance was £5,201 ($10,470) (Meller, 1979,  p. 166).   The site is
 located in what is now the southwest sector of the Enterprise Zone.
                                       178

-------
      RTZ—The 52.5 hectare  (130 acres)
         tract which occupies the north eastern
 sector of the Project Area has been the  site of  zinc  (or  spelter) works  since
 1876  (Bridges, 1984a, p. 8).  The earlier works,  was known as  Swansea Vale;
 later the Rio Tinto Zinc (RTZ) Company1 produced  zinc,  lead, and  sulfuric acid
 on the site.  RTZ closed the smelting operations in 1971; the adjacent
 sulfuric acid works continued operatioli until 1974.  Acquisition of this land
 by the Council in October 1974 was the
 Valley (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 17).  The RTZ smelter and acid plant
 remained a major active source of poll
 pollution, and generating toxic wastes
         last of the major purchases in the
        .ition, creating air emissions, water
          until its closure.
      The RTZ site lies within the Enterprise Zone established in 1981.  The
 planned redevelopment of the RTZ site includes.industrial parks and a flood-
 control lake.  (The Industrial Park La
 sequence of reclamation schemes at RTZ
        ce is discussed in Section 4.3.8.)  The
         began on the accessible land adjacent
 to Nantyffin Road,  and proceeded toward the interior of the Valley after the
 construction of access roads (Bromley and Morgan,  1983, p. 82).  With the
 exception of the initial clearance work (RTZ I),  the reclamation efforts at
 RTZ have been funded by 100 percent greints from the WDA.
      The first reclamation work,  RTZ I,  involving  3.5 hectares (8.6 acres),
 was carried out in  1974-1975.   Excavations involved 75,000 cubic meters
 (98,093  cubic yards)  of material (Jones,  1979,  p.  194).  This initial
 clearance effort -was  carried out by thej City Council without grant-aid
 (Meller,  1979,  p. 166).
      The  second reclamation effort,  RTZ  II,  involved 5.5 hectares  (13.6  acres)
 and included the construction of a culjert on sites 3 and 6.   The  work was
 completed in September 1977 (Bromley arid Morgan, 1983,  pp.  78,  85).   The site
 work involved excavation of 80,000 cubic meters  (104,632 cubic yards)  of
 material  (Jones, 1979, p.  194).   The first phase of RTZ III and IV reclamation
 was  carried out in  1978-1979.  This  effort involved 24.5 hectares  (60.5  acres)
and excavation of  620,000 cubic meters
 (Jones, 1979, p. 194).  In 1980-1982 the second phase of this  reclamation
effort was completed; this involved reclamation of 8.3 hectares  (20.5 acres)
at Site 6 and installation of a culvert
         (810,900 cubic yards) of material
         on site 4  (Bromley and Morgan.,  1983,
p. 79).  Borrow material from the Glandwr/Morfa site and Frederick Place were
used to raise the level of RTZ Site 6  (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 76).
Infrastructure including roads, sewers,
with the reclamation efforts carried ou
costs and grant- aid follows—
     Cost (RTZ I,  clearance):
     Grant-aid: none
£58,084
         and utilities were provided in concert
        b between 1979 and 1983.  A summary of
;$123,268)
                                      179

-------
    Cost  (reclamation plus  land purchase)
    RTZ II:   £248,888  ($448,770)
    RTZ III  & IV:   Phase  1—£368,466  ($743,920)
                    Phase  2—£502,000  ($1,028,606)
    WDA grant-aid  (RTZ  II,'III, &  IV):   £1,119,354  ($2,221,296)
    Reference:  Elias,  1979, p. 210.

    Cost  (infrastructure):  £900,008  ($1,847,808)
    ERDF  grant-aid:  £259,957  ($535,108)
    LEA grant-aid:   £138,235  ($280,778)
    Reference:  (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  pp.  78,8b,»»).

    Costs (landscaping):   £75,900  ($165,086)
    Grant-aid: none
    Reference: (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  pp.  97).

    Total expenditures (listed above):   £2,153,346  ($4,357,458).


    The  final costs of the reclamation work at RTZ  far exceeded the initial
estimates for clearance of the site due to unforeseen problems.  Some of the
problems encountered at the site were highlighted in 1979 by City Engineer and

Surveyor,  Mr. Haydn Jones—

     "Prior to the sale of the (RTZ)  site  ...,  the Company dismantled the
     plant and some of the structures on the site, making the engineering
     problems more difficult to assess.  This is because the size of the
     superstructures and the physical dimensions of structural members are
     invaluable in assessing probable foundation sizes as well as tracing
     other underground structures.  On handover two large structures remained
     on the site, a fairly substantial three-storey office block and a
     treatment works.  It was intended that the office block be incorporated
     in the site development, but a detailed investigation of the structure^
     revealed the presence of High Alumina Cement which had produced serious
     deterioration  of the reinforced  concrete frame.  The office block
     therefore needed to  be demolished  ....

     "The treatment plant was used by the  Company primarily to treat their
     industrial effluent  prior to discharge into the adjoining river   It was
     expected that  demolition of the  works would therefore allow the plant  to
     be dispensed with.   Unfortunately  tests carried out on discharges into
     the adjoining  river  indicated  (unacceptable) PH readings, and  further
     investigations revealed a culvert  beneath  the site, constructed to
     transport  groundwater  from an unpolluted  source outside the eastern
     boundary of the  site.  This culvert was in a state of near collapse,
     allowing polluted water beneath  the site  to  enter the culvert  and pollute
     its  contents.   It was  therefore  necessary  to continue operating the
     treatment plant  until  1978 when  the old culvert was replaced with one
     specially designed to  high  load  bearing capacity and chemically
     rllistant,  at  a cost of £70,000  ($134,288).''   (Jones, 1979, pp. 193-5)

     Meller  (1979,  p.  166)  noted that the  cost  to the Council  of operating  the

 treatment works for two-ctnd-a-half years was £66,952 ($122,033).   Further
 expense was  also incurred in 1977 when a change in policy regarding the use of
 the reclaimed land resulted in regrading at the site costing an additional

 £30,000  ($52,347)   (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p. 76).
                                       180

-------
                                    later the Morfa Industrial Estate) stood
                                      the site.  At the time the- City acquired
                                    a number of small enterprises  (e.g., motor
      Glandwr/Morfa—The Glandwr /Mo trf a site is located on the west bank of the
 river Tawe, immediately south of the Landore Viaduct. 'The Council purchased
 14.7 hectares  (36.7 acres) of Morfk land adjacent to the Glandwr Works in
 October 1970 and the Glandwr Works site (2.3 hectares. [5.7 acres] in 1971.
 The site known as Glandwr/Morfa comprises these two sites. In 1971, the land
 included two large tips and areas covered by redundant buildings (Morris,
 1979,  p. 188).  The Morfa Tip (and
. adjacent to the southern boundary
 the Glandwr Works site, there were
 repairers,  TV aerial firms) in operation there.  In late 1978 nine tenants
 were still on the Glandwr site.   Removal of these tenants delayed the '
 clearance effort.  The work also suffered due to a moratorium imposed by
 Central Government in 1979/1980  (Bromley and Morgan,  1983 p.'  ). *
     Clearance work at the 10.4  hectare  (25.4 acres)  site,was carried out
 during the period October 1980 to April  1982 (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p.
 79).   Borrow material from this  site was used in 'the  reclamation of RTZ Site
 6.   The reclamation work at Glandwir/Morfa was planned from 1976 to  be a
 combined venture with the RTZ reclamation.   WDA grants  covered the  total  cost
 of  the effort  (included in the total for the RTZ site).   The  Glandwr/Morfa
 site was eventually reclaimed for sports use (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p,
 122) .
     Morriston  Lower  Gas Works—The
 acquired in 1967  from the  Somerset
                                    Morriston Lower Gas Works  site  was
                                    Trust  along with the Dyffryn Steel Works.
cubic meters  (247,193  cubic yards)
reclamation effort  as  well as  land
approved  for  100 percent  grant-aid
 The  13  hectares  (32.1 acres)  site is located within the Enterprise Zone.   The
 site reclamation work was  carried cut in 1978-79;  excavations involved 189,000
                                    of material  (Jones,  1979,  p.  194).   The
                                    acquisition  costs of £18000  ($32,809)  were
                                    from the WDA.  Construction work to  provide
roads and sewers was  carried  out between  1979  and  1983.
Industrial Estate has been developed on this site.

                                             £191,266  ($395,977)
                                                         The Gas Works
     Cost (reclamation plus land purchase):
     WDA grant-aid:  100 percent   I
     Reference:  Elias, 1979, p. 211; Bromley and Morgan , 1983, p.
     Cost (infrastructure):  £435,1173 ($779,992)
                                                                    79.
     Grant-aid:  pending
     Reference:  Bromley and Morgan
     Centre Tip (Cwm Level)—This 3
1978-79, the final clearance involving
yards) of material (Jones, 1979, p.
£22,000 ($44,376)  and site works,
                                  £115
                                     1983, pp. 88, 86.
hectare (7.4 acre) site was reclaimed in
   86,000 cubic meters  (112,479 cubic
194).  The cost of land acquisition,
  ,000 ($231,967) were covered by a 100
                                      181

-------
percent grant-aid from the WDA (Meller, 1979, p. 172).  Additional landscaping
completed in 1979 brought the total costs to £48,000  ($101,875) (Meller, 1979,
p. 174).  The end use of the site is classified as amenity  (Jones, ,1979, p.
194).
     Pentre Pit—The reclamation scheme at Pentre Pit was carried out by the
Swansea City Council without grant-aid; costs totalled £12,909  ($29,445)
(Meller, 1979, p. 166).
     Upper Bank Tip—The lands at Middle and Upper Bank were the first of the
derelict properties acquired by the Council.  A portion of  this land and a
usable building were sold the same year to Addis Ltd  for the establishment of
a factory  (Morris, 1979, p. 185).  An  additional 8.6  hectares  (21.2 acres) at
Upper Bank were acquired in 1966.  A portion of the purchase price of these
two  lands, was covered by the WDA grant as part of the reclamation costs
 (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 19).
     The reclamation at Upper Bank involved removal of three large tips.  The
work was carried out in two phases in  1980 and  1981-1982.   The first phase
involved reclamation of 8.5 hectares  (21 acres) and  laying  of  sewer  lines
prior to construction  of an athletics  track  at  a cost of  £70,000  ($132,030).
The  second reclamation effort addressed  15 hectares  (37 acres), with the
excavations supplying  borrow material  for Site  6  in  the Enterprise Zone.
Costs associated with  this work totalled £237,811  ($448,547).   The reclamation
costs were covered by  WDA  grant-aid  (100  percent)  Bromley and Morgan,  1983,
pp.  79-80).
     Pluck Lake Tip—In 1978-79  15 hectares  (37 acres) were reclaimed  for
amenity use,  the  excavations  involving 32,000  cubic  meters  (41,853 cubic
yards)  of  material (Jones,  1979,  p.  194).   The costs of  land acquisition,
 £7,7000 ($15,532)  and works,  £30,000  ($60,513)  were  covered by 100 percent
 grant-aid from the WDA (Meller,  1979,  p.  172).
     Winsh Wen  Site  Preparations—In 1979,  12  hectares  (29.6 acres)  were
 immediately available at Winsh Wen for industrial sites  (Meller,  1979,  pp.
 177).   Preparations  at the site (plateauing and installation of roads and
 sewers) continued during late 1980 and early 1981 in order to make some 45
 hectares (111 acres)  of industrial land south of the A48 ready for letting by
 the date of declaration of the Enterprise Zone (Meller,  1979, p.  178;  Bromley
 and Morgan,  1983,  p. 82).   ERDF grants for 30 percent of the approved cost
 were awarded for site preparation and for development of roads and services on
 the Winsh Wen site between 1974 and 1983 (Meller, 1979,  p.  173).   This land
 was developed by the Council without  a specific developer  in mind.
                                       182

-------
     Cost  (Site preparation, infrastructure):  £474,528  ($986,736)
     ERDF grant-aid:  £146,242  ($307,027)
     LEA grant-aid:  £31,191 ($58,830^
     Reference: Bromley and Morgan, 1983, pp. 79,85,87.
     In 1971, there were 1392 households in the planning zone of Winsh
Wen/Llansamlet, with  62 percent being Council Housing  (Fagg, 1979, p. 133).
Between 1971 and  1978 there were 281 house completions, divided equally
between private and Council houses  (Fkgg, 1979, p.  135).  Planning approval
has been granted  for  968 additional dwellings, and  it  is expected that about
600 units will actually be built by 1990  (Fagg, 1979,  p. 136) .
     Site 8C and Site 14—These sites
reclamation cost was £7,031  ($12,290)
 are  located in  the  central  area of the
Enterprise Zone, just north of the Lower Gas Works site.  The reclamation was
carried out in 1982 with grant-aid  (100 percent) provided by the WDA.  The
 (Bromley and Morgan,  1983,  p.  80).
     White Rock Works—The  site of the historic White Rock Works and
associated land  (3.73 hectare  [9.2 acres]  ) was purchased by the County
Borough Council in 1965.  The site is
Tawe, immediately to the south of the
 located on the west bank of the river
 Middle Bank land.which was acquired
earlier in 1965.  These two properties were the first acquired by the Council.
The site was rough, uneven, and encumbered with ruins.  Most of the ruins of
the original White Rock Works were cleared by the Royal Engineers in 1965 as a
training exercise  (Morris, 1979, p. 186.
    .At the time of purchase,  there remained an active scrapyard within a
dilapidated building.  Clearance of this building was later carried out with
grant-aid from WDA.  Costs of £4,500
($127,589) for works at the site were
the WDA 1976- 1978 plan (Meller, 1979
($8,202)  for land acquisition and £70,000
 approved for 100 percent  grant-aid in
  p.  172).
     In 1985, the site stood vacant except for some of the more substantial
structures from the historic Works.  The last two chimneys in the Valley
remain standing at White Rock, almost
 as a monument  to  its  industrial  past.
There has been some consideration given to retaining the remaining ruins as
the basis for an archaeology park.  Wxth this in mind, the City incorporated
the area as a "cluster" in its planning scheme for the Riverside Park and
prepared a report outlining the park development (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p.
16).  There remains uncertainty about this development plan as the site lies
in one possible route of the important Hafod bypass.  Thus, "the proposed
recreational and landscaping improvements cannot be finalized until final
agreement is reached on the road" (Bromley and Morgan, 1983, p. 16). '
                                      183

-------
     Other Sites—Three sites of significance to the Lower Swansea Valley that
were purchased and improved are listed below.  WDA grants totalling 100
percent of the costs of acquisition and works were awarded for these sites in

the period 1976-1978.

                          Land Cost             Cost of Works
     Site

Arches at Landore
St. Thomas Station Site
Strand/Quay Parade
                          £2,000  ($3,645)
                          £14,000  ($25,518)
                          £162,500  ($296,189)
£19,000 ($34,631)
£230,000 ($419,221)
£289,000 ($526,760)
     Arches Reference: Meller, 1979 p. 172.
Flood Control


     At the 1979 Conference on the Lower Swansea Valley, Mr. Haydn Jones, City

Engineer and Surveyer, presented a paper, "Engineering  Problems and Their
Solutions." One section of this paper dealt with the issues of drainage and

flooding;  excerpts from Mr. Jones presentation follow.

     "The northern area of the Lower Swansea Valley Project Area is a natural
     flood plain and the marsh area both north and south of the A48 has been
     flooded on a number of occasions over recent years.  The flooding of the
     Nant-y-Fendrod (a tributary of the river Tawe) would prove to be a
     serious drawback to development unless controlled.  To raise the land
     level adjacent to the Nant-y Fendrod would not provide a satisfactory
     solution, as the removal from the 'reservoir' would merely transfer the
     problem elsewhere. "Within the flood plain, south of the A48, the City
     Council has planned the creation of a lake in the proposed industrial
     park.  This lake, in addition to providing an important amenity area,
     will act as a flood prevention lagoon. "In preparing the details for the
     formation of the lake there are specific problems  to be overcome; the
     eastern boundary of the proposed lake is formed by a tip containing toxic
     material and the existing marsh surface has become impregnated with toxic
     material....  The examination of the tip material  showed conclusively
     that  its effect on the water quality in the lake would be
     catastrophic	.  As a result it is proposed to remove an average of 1.5
     m, from the existing marsh surface which contains  polluted material.
     Further excavations will then create a lake of a depth of three meters
     and produce suitable uncontaminated clay material  from this lower depth
     of marsh.  This can be used to provide an impermeable layer along the
     lake bank, in those parts which have a close proximity to tips on the
     eastern edge of the lake.  By this means a lake of satisfactory depth and
     sufficiently separated from contaminated materials can be created."
      (Jones, 1979, pp. 195-6).


     The WDA has approved 100 percent grant aid for the Industrial Park Lake—
 £54,000  ($98,426)  for  land acquisition plus £675,000  ($1,184,755)  for the cost

 of works  (Meller,  1979, p. 172).  Drainage of the  Fendrod Marsh began in  1983
 for the proposed  Industrial-Park Lake  (Bridges  1983-1984, p.  33-4).
                                      184

-------
 Criteria for Cleanup

      At the 1979 Conference on the
 Council Environmental Health Officer
 "Environmental Monitoring and Control
 pollution follow:
Lower Swansea Valley, the Swansea City
   (Davies, R.L., 1979 pp. 73-87) spoke on
      Some of his statements regarding land
      "From surveys  and analyses,  areas  have  been identified where levels of
      trace metals are  in sufficient  concentrations  to constitute a potential
      danger to workmen exposed to dust  during contracting operations,  and
      where leachate of toxic metals  fipm waste materials  could possibly affect
      water courses.  It was also  concluded that  some  sites,  by their very
      nature, are best  left in  situ and  capped with  an impermeable layer of
      material over  which vegetation  should be encouraged  to grow."   (Davies,
      R.L.,  1979, p.  77)

 The  criteria used to make these judgerients were  not stated,  but human  health
 considerations are  implied.   In some cases (Bridges,  1984c,  p. 29)  levels of
 metals  in  soils and tipped wastes were  compared  against guidelines used in the
 United  Kingdom to identify contaminated land (ICRCL,  1983).   These guidelines,
 established by the  Department  of  Environment,  are discussed in Section 3 of
 this  report.
      The Area Medical  Officer  also conmented  on  environment  and health in  the
 Valley.  He noted that,  "almost no data have  been analyzed or presented
 concerning positive health, ill health  or  morbidity,  or mortality,
 specifically related to the population1  of  the Lower Swansea Valley"  (Phillips-
 Miles,  1979, p. 92).   The Medical Officer  contended that  sufficient  clues
 exist to promote an epidemiological  study  in  the Swansea  Valley.   He cited
 available  statistics indicating that  deaths  from coronary heart disease are
 higher  in  males age  35-44 years from West  Glamorgan than  from England  and
 Wales and  also that ,the  perinatal mortality rate is higher in West Glamorgan
than in Wales.  Motor neurone disease
   which  is  linked  to  lead in  the  cerebro-
spinal fluid may also be more common in West Glamorgan.  To date human health
effects attributable to exposure to the contamination in the Lower Swansea
Valley have not been established.                          •
     The criteria for cleanup for remediation efforts in the  Valley most often
relate to improvement in site appearance and to adequate bearing capacity for
building sites.  Reclamation activitieb often involved removal of tipped waste
and regrading to level a site.  Site reclamation in some instances was based
on achieving conditions that would support amenity planting.   The extent of
the cleanup action (excavation, treatment, isolation) was not based on levels
of specific chemicals determined by testing.  Some distinctions were made
between certain waste types based on t
   leir perceived potential hazard to human
                                      185

-------
health or ecology.  For the most part visual inspection was sufficient to
separate certain material categorized as hazardous from that of less concern.
Wastes considered hazardous were in some cases removed to a prepared site for
burial.  At the prepared site the hazardous material would be covered with
significant thicknesses of less hazardous and "clean" fill so that human
exposure to the hazardous material is precluded.  No material has been removed
from the Valley, although in some cases tipped wastes from a particular site
were transferred several miles to-provide needed fill for another site
undergoing reclamation.

The River Tawe—
     Pertinent water quality data are published by the South West Wales River
Authority  (prior to 1974) and by the Welsh Water Authority.  Water quality.
trends based on 13 water quality parameters were examined by Bird  (1983) for
an unpolluted site in  the upper Tawe catchment and at three sites within the
Lower Swansea Valley for the period April 1, 1965 to March 31, 1982.  Table 12
lists the water quality parameters used in the analysis and recommended
acceptable limits.
     Through the majority of its course, the river Tawe is used principally
for industrial water supply, for  sewage disposal, and as an amenity.  Since
the water quality criteria applicable to a given stream are linked to the
actual or potential uses of the water, the most stringent criteria set  (i.e.,
the criteria for the most sensitive use) must be used.  Thus the aesthetic
qualities of the river Tawe and the ecosystem it supports assume a greater
significance in light  of the amenity function envisioned for the river  in the
Lower Swansea Valley.  Plans for  a Riverside Park will  "require an improvement
in the river's aesthetic qualities, including the cessation of any odor
nuisance,  as well as improvement  in its aquatic flora and  fauna"  (Bird,  19,83,
p. 66).
     One way to assess water quality is by comparison to natural
characteristics of water of the same region.  Thus water quality in  the  Lower
Swansea Valley may be  judged by comparison  to water  quality at a site that
drains the upper part  of the Tawe catchment where the surrounding  land  use
consists mainly of rough pasture  and forest with  little human  interference
with water quality.  Water quality may  also be  assessed by determining  certain
water quality parameters  in water samples  taken from strategic  locations at
various times and comparing the results  to  specified criteria  that  relate to
safe acceptable  levels which will not  result  in undesirable effects.
                                      186

-------
                           TABLE 12.  WATER QUALITY CRITERIA*
                          	i
 Parameter Measured
                                         Criteria
 PH
 Temperature
 Total Hardness
Dissolved Oxygen
   (DO),  % of  saturation
5-Day Biochemical
  Oxygen Demand  (BOD)

Ammoniacal
  nitrogen  (as N)
Suspended solids
   (at 105 °C)
Total Cadmium



Total Chromium


Total Copper


Total Lead




Total Nickel


Total Zinc
 Levels of 5 to
 (Train,  1979).

 Higher than 22
 abstraction of

 Classification

 Concentration
   as CaCO,	

 0-75 mg/L
 75 - 15 0" mg/L
 •150 - 300 mg/L
 >300 mg/L
  9 recommended for domestic water supplies


 5 C is considered undesirable for the
  drinking water (EEC, 1975) .

  of water hardness (Sawyer, 1960)


              Classification

              soft
              moderate
              hard
              very hard
 Natural waters  are  normally  expected to  exhibit  near 100%
 saturation levels of  DO;  river stretches regularly
 exhibiting levels < 60% saturation are considered
                           substandard in
                           classification
                the National Water  Council  (NWC)  river
                system (NWC, 1978).
BOD  levels  >  5 mg/L  indicate polluted  rivers  in  the  NWC
river classification system  (NWC,  1978) .
River stretches exhibiting  ionized ammonia  (NH4) levels
> 0.9 mg/L are|regarded as  polluted  (NWC, 1978).  Adverse
effects on fish may occur from prolonged exposure at  >0.025
mg/L NH3.              "                 •

Levels < 25 mg/L are considered desirable for good  fisheries
(EEC, 1975); use of water for boating and fishing are
adequately protected by the criteria for the protection of
aquatic life.       •                                        „

Levels < 0.012 mg/L are desireable for  the protection of
aquatic life and for water  supply purposes; most natural
freshwaters contain <  0.001 mg/L  (Train, 1979).
Levels > 0.1 me
aquatic life
  /L  are  considered undesirable for freshwater
(Tj-rain, 1979).
Levels < 0.05
abstraction of
4g/L are  necessary  for water intended for the
  drinking water (EEC,  1975).
Mean natural levels in a river lie between 0.001 and
0.01 mg/L  (Livingstone, 1983); levels of < 0.05 mg/L are
necessary  for water intended for the abstraction•of drinking
water  (EEC, 197^5) .

Levels as  low ds 0.095 mg/L can adversely affect certain
freshwater crudtaceans (Train, 1979).

Levels should be < 3 mg/L in domestic supplies  (EEC, 1975).
*Source:  Bird, 1983.
                                          187

-------
                                      REFERENCES
Bird, S., 1983.  "Water Quality."  In:  Change and Industrial Redevelopment in the
Lower Swansea Valley, R.D.F. Bromley and R.H. Morgan, Editors, pp. 27-68.  Published
by the University College of Swansea, Department of Geography, ISBN 0 950738417.

Bridges, E. M., 1984a.  NATO-CCMS, Study of Contaminated Land, Visit to the Lower
Swansea Valley.  Contribution to the Cardiff Meeting 9th-10th April, 1984.  University
College of Swansea, Department of Geography.

Bridges, E.M., 1984b.  "Desecration and Restoration of the Lower Swansea Valley."   In
Proceedings:  The 5th National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites, November 7-9, Washington, DC, pp. 553-559.

Bridges, E. M., 1984c.  "The Use of Remote Sensing in the Identification, Mapping and
Monitoring of Contaminated Land."  Report upon the tenure of a NATO-CCMS Fellowship,
1983-1984.  Available from E.M. Bridges, University College of Swansea.

Bridges, E. M., D. S. Chase, and S.J. Wainwright, 1979.  "Soil and Plant
Investigations since 1967."  In:  Dealing With Dereliction, The Redevelopment of the
Lower Swansea Valley, Bromley, R. D. F., and G. Humphrys, Editors, pp. 23-42.
Published by the University College of Swansea, ISBN 0 860760154.

Bridges, E. M., and D. M. Harding, 1971.  "Micro-Erosion Processes and Factors
Affecting Slope Development in the Lower Swansea Valley."  Transactions of the
Institute of British Geographers, Special Publication No. 3, pp. 149-163) .

Bromley, R. D. F., and G. Humphrys, Editors, 1979. Dealing With Dereliction, The
Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea Valley,  Published by the University College of
Swansea, ISBN 0 860760154.

Bromley, R. D. F., and R. H. Morgan, 1983. Change and Industrial Redevelopment  in the
Lower Swansea Valley,  Published by the University College of Swansea, Department of
Geography, ISBN 0 9507384 17.

Chase, D. S., and S. J. Wainwright, 1983.   "Vertical Distribution of Copper, .Zinc, and
Lead Ions in Weathered Tips of Copper Smelter Waste in the Lower Swansea Valley."
Environmental Pollution  (Series B), pp. 133-46.

Chase, D.:S., S. J. Wainwright, and E. M. Bridges, 1981.   "Distribution of Copper,
Lead, Zinc, Cadmium and Nickel in  Plants Superficial Organic Layers and Mineral Soils
of the Lower Swansea Valley."  From:  "The  Productivity of Restored Land."  Land
Decade Educational Council, 9 Queen Anne's Gate, London.

Davies, R. L., 1979.  "Environmental Monitoring and Control."  In:  Dealing With
Dereliction, The Redevelopment of  the Lower Swansea Valley, Bromley, R. D. F.,  and G.
Humphrys, Editors, pp. 73-87.  Published by the University College of Swansea,  ISBN 0
8.60760154.                                                                   V

Davies, B. et al., 1983.  "Halkyn Mountain  Project Report:  A Summary of Research Work
1976-1983."  Final Report to the Welsh Office.

EEC  (European Economic Community), 1975.  Council Directive of 16 June 1975,  on the
quality of surface water  intended  for the abstraction of drinking water in the  member
states  (75/440/EEC).        "
                                          188

-------
 Ellas,  J.,  1979.   "The Role of the Welsh Development Agency."   In:   Dealing With
 Dereliction,  The  Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea Valley,  Bromley,  R.  D.  P.,  and G.
 Humphrys,  Editors,  pp. 205-216.   Published by the University College of  Swansea,  ISBN
 0 860760154.
 Fagg,  B.  C.,  1979.   "Housing and Social Development."   In:   Dealing With Dereliction,
 The Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea Valley,  Bromley,  R.  D.  F.,  and G. Humphrys,
 Editors,  pp.  125-146.  Published by the Unjiversity College of Swansea,  ISBN 0
 860760154.

 Goodman,  G. T.,  1979.   "Airborne Heavy Mejtal Pollution." In:  Dealing With
 Dereliction,_The Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea Valley,  Bromley, R.  D. P.,  and G.
 Humphrys,  Editors,  pp.  59-72.  Published toy the University College of Swansea,  ISBN 0
 860760154.

 Hilton, K.  J.,  Editor,  1967.  The Lower Swansea Valley Project.   Longmans, London.

 Howell, M.,  1979.  "Planning of the Valley Since 1974:  Physical Plans With a Social
 Meaning."   In:   Dealing With Dereliction,\ The Redevelopment of the Lower'Swansea
 Valley
	  Bromley, R. D. P., and G. Humphryls, Editors, pp. 251-260.
University College of Swansea, ISBN 0 860760154.
'Humphrys,  G.,  1972.
 Newton Abbott.
                     Industrial Britain:
 Humphrys,  G.,  R.  D.  F.  Bromley,  and M.  J.
 Employment."  In:  Dealing With Dereliction
 Valley,  Bromley,
	           R. D. F., and G. Humphryis, Editors, pp. 219-242.  Published by the
University College of Swansea, ISBN 0 860760154.
 Hutson,  S.  and M.  Stacey,  1979.   "Living
 Dereliction,  The Redevelopment of the
                                      Lower
 Humphrys,  Editors,  pp.  97-123.  Published
 860760154.

 ICRL,  1983.•  "Guidance on the Assessment
 ICRL 59/83.   Interdepartmental Committee
 Department of Environment (DOE).
                          Published by the
 Industrial South Wales.   David and Charles,
                                          Clark, 1979.  "Industrial Activity and
                                             The Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea
in the Valley." ' In:   Dealing With
   Swansea Valley,  Bromley,  R. D. F.,  and G.
by the University College of Swansea,  ISBN 0
                                         and Redevelopment of Contaminated Land."
                                         on the Redevelopment of Contaminated Land,
 Jones,  H.  I.  I.,  1979.   "Engineering Problems and Their Solution." In:   Dealing With
 Dereliction,  The Redevelopment of the Lowier Swansea Valley,  Bromley,  R.  D.  P.,  and G.
 Humphrys,  Editors,  pp.  191-197.  Published by the University College of Swansea, ISBN
 0 860760154.
 Lavender,  S.  J.,  1979.  •"Community
 Dealing With Dereliction,  The Redevelopment
                                   Involvement
 D.  F.,  and G.  Humphrys,  Editors,  pp. 153-
 Swansea,  ISBN.O 860760154.
                                         159.  Published by the University College of
 Ledger,  D.  C,  1967.   "The River Tawe."
 Hilton,  ed.,  p.  121. Longmans,  London.
 Livingstone,  D.  A.,  1963.   "Chemical
 Survey Professional Paper,  440-G.
        The Work of the Conservator."  In:
   of the Lower Swansea Valley,  Bromley,  R.
                                        In:  The Lower Swansea Valley Project, K. J.
                                     Composition of Rivers and Lakes." Geological
 Meller,  B.  B.,  1979.  "The Financial Comnitment of the Swansea City Council."  In:
 Dealing With Dereliction,  The Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea Valley,  Bromley,  R.
 D.  F.,and G.  Humphrys,Editors,  pp. 165-179.Published by the University College of
 Swansea,  ISBN 0 860760154.

 Morris,  B. H-, 1979.  "Land Assembly:  Problems and Progress."  In:   Dealing With
 Dereliction,  The Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea Valley, Bromley,  R.  D.
 Humphrys,  Editors,  pp.  181-190.
 0 860760154.
                                 	                     and G.
                                 Published by the University College of Swansea, ISBN
                                           189

-------
Morris, J. 1984.  The Matter of Wales;   Epic Views of a Small Country.   Oxford
University Press, Oxford.

NWC  (National Water Council), 1978.  Water Industry Review 1978.  London.

Page, R. A., 1984.  "Overview of Hazardous Waste Site Problems in Wales."  In:
Proceedings of The 5th  National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites, November 7-9, 1984, Washington, DC, pp. 594-597.

Page, R. A., G. D. Parry, and A. F. Smith, 1984.  "Waste Land Survey Warns Developers
in Wales."  Surveyor, Vol. 29, Business Press International, U.K.  November 1984, pp.
4-1S.

Phillips-Miles, D., 1979.  "Background Comment:  Environment and Health."  In:
Dealing With Dereliction, The Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea Valley, Bromley, R.
D. P., and G. Humphrys, Editors, pp. 93-93.Published by the University College of
Swansea, ISBN 0 860760154.

Rush, M. E. J., 1979.  "The Financial Commitment of the West Glamorgan County
Council."  In:  Dealing With Dereliction, The Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea
Valley, Bromley, R. D. F., and G. Humphrys, Editors, pp. 199-206.  Published by the
University College of Swansea, ISBN 0 860760154.

Sawyer, C. N., 1960.  Chemistry for Sanitary Engineers.  McGraw-Hill, New York.

SW Echo, 1984.  "Toxic Tip 'Essentially Safe' Claim."  SW Echo, Cardiff.

Train, R. E., 1979.  Quality Criteria for Water.  Castle House Publications, London.

Ward, W. J., 1979.  "Planning of the Valley Before 1974."  In:  Dealing With
Dereliction, The Redevelopment of the Lower Swansea Valley, Bromley, R. D. F., and G.
Humphrys, Editors, pp. 243-250.Published by the University College of Swansea, ISBN
0 860760154.

WDA  (Welsh Development Agency), 1984a.  Explanatory Memorandum on Grants for the
Reclamation or Improvement of Derelict Land by Local Authorities Under the Welsh
Development Agency Act 1975 Section 16.  Welsh Development Agency, Treforest
Industrial Estate, Pontypridd, Mid Glamorgan.

WDA  (Welsh Development Agency), 1984b.  Explanatory Memorandum on Grants to Persons
for the Reclamation of Derelict Land in Wales.  Welsh Development Agency, Treforest
Industrial Estate, Pontypridd, Mid Glamorgan.

WDA  (Welsh Development Agency), 1984c. "The Changing Face of Wales, Welsh Development
Agency, Land Reclamation."  Published by the Information Department of the Welsh
Development Agency, Treforest Industrial Estate, Pontypridd, Mid Glamorgan.

WO/WDA  (Welsh Office/Welsh Development Agency), 1984.  "Survey of Contaminated Land in
Wales."  Final Report prepared by Liverpool University, Environmental Advisory Unit,
under contract to the Welsh Office.  March 1984.
                                          190

-------
                                    SECTION 5
                                     SWEDEN
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
     Situated on the Scandanavian peninsula,  Sweden is the  fourth largest
nation in Europe.  Sweden's land area  is  449,750 square  kilometers (173,649
square miles), somewhat larger than the State of California.   The population
numbers approximately  8 million, which is quite small in relation to the  land
area.   Nearly 90 percent of the inhabitants  live in the  southern half of.the
country,  and about 85  percent live in  densely populated  metropolitan areas or
towns.   The three largest cities are
one household in three  is located in
Stockholm,  Goteborg, and Malmo.   About
one of these cities or their metropolitan
areas.   Incomes and standards of living  in Sweden are generally viewed as  the
highest  in Europe.
    Sweden is governed  by a constitutional monarchy, with  the seat of
government located in Stockholm.  The Swedish parliament,  or Riksdag, has  349
members  elected by direct universal suffrage.  All laws in Sweden are made at
the national level, although ordinances  and regulations are enacted'at the
local  level.  The government has authority to change ordinances and
regulations.   Twenty-four county administrations are responsible for
implementing administrative decisions.  The  head of each of  these county-state
administrations is appointed by the government.   Local administration is
provided by 23 county councils and 284 municipal councils that  are locally
Authors' Note:  Much of the information provided in this Section was obtained during the authors'
visit to Stockholm in March 1985.  Mr. Olov v<|n Heidenstam of the National Swedish Environmental
Protection Board, Technical Department, gracicjusly hosted our visit.  Information on the     • .
Augustendal site was obtained during a site visit to the Environmental and Health Office of the
Nacka Community where we met with several individuals involved with the site including Ms.
Charlotte Eriksson, Health Inspector.  Dr. Peter Solyom of the Swedish Environmental Research
Institute, IVL, met with us to discuss the cleanup in progress at the BT-Kemi dumpsite.
                                       L91

-------
elected and operate in parallel with the county-state administrations.  (The
County of Gotland comprises a single municipality and thus has a municipal
council but no county council.)  Health and medical care are the
responsibility of the county councils while local school systems and almost
all other social services'are the responsibility of the municipal councils.
    There is, in spite of large scale construction programs, a shortage of
housing in the larger cities.  About one half of Sweden's housing is privately
owned, one quarter is owned by housing cooperatives, and most of the remainder
is owned by semipublic bodies.  The HSB housing cooperative, set up in 1923,
has been particularly active in providing housing; one home in ten in Sweden
has been built by the HSB.  State loans are available to cooperative and
semipublic bodies and (to a lesser extent) to private builders for financing
housing development.
    Sweden's important raw materials are iron ore and lumber.  The forest
industry supplies lumber, pulp, paper, and board as well as rayon, plastics,
dyes, resins, and turpentine.  Corporations and private owners control at
least three quarters of the forest land and timber value.

Environmental Legislation and Implementation

    The responsibility for environmental programs in Sweden is vested in the
Ministry of Environment and Energy.  An Environmental Advisory Committee also
plays a role in this field.  The central administrative authority for environ-
mental affairs is the National Swedish Environmental Protection Board.  This
board executes the decisions of the Riksdag and the government, keeps track of
new developments, and proposes necessary measures to the Government.  The
budget for environmental protection is provided through the Ministry of
Environment and Energy.  The emphasis in environmental policy is on
administrative means of control, mainly through the issuance of permits and
physical planning.  The responsibility for national physical planning resides
with the Ministry of Housing.  The regional authority for environmental
protection is the county administration.  Considerable responsibility also
falls on the municipalities, in particular on the Housing Committees and the
Public Health Committees.  Public opinion has exerted considerable influence
                                     192

-------
 on environmental protection work in
 the highest  rated priorities of the
                                    Sweden.  Environmental issues are among
                                    Swedish general public, and this has had a
 strong impact  on the political  decis ions  behind the national environmental

 policy (National Swedish Environmental  Protection Board,  Technical Department,
 1982,  p.  37).
    Direct  environmental  legislatior
 (concerned  with the management  of  n
                                     includes the Nature Conservancy Act
                                    tural assets); the Environment Protection
Act and the Environment  Protection  Ordinance  (concerned with polluting
activity  such as air  and water pollution, and  noise);  the  Ordinance  Relating

                                     Chemical Products  (regulates  the handling
                                     ons) .
to Hazardous Wastes; and the Act on

of chemical substances and preparati
The Environment Protection Act  (1969J:387) applies to the  following:


    o  discharge of wastewater, solid matter, or gas from land, buildings, or
       installations into a watercourse, lake, or other water area;

    «  use of land, buildings, or installations in a manner that otherwise may
       lead to pollution of a watercourse, lake, or other water area,  if the
       use does not constitute a construction in water;
    «  use of land, buildings, or installations in a manner that may lead to
       interference with the environment by air pollution, noise, vibration,
       light, or other such means, unless the interference is wholly
       temporary."
    Under the Act, the government or

has the right to issue special regulati

water by solid waste.  The governmen


    •  certain kinds of factories or
                                     an authority nominated by the government

                                      ions for the prevention of pollution of
                                    ; may order that:
       wastewater of a certain
       discharged;
       solid waste or other solid ma
       such a way that a watercourse
       polluted;
                                     other establishments may not be erected;

                               quantity,  type,  or composition may not be
                                     ter may not  be discharged or stored in
                                      lake,  or other water area can be
       certain kinds of establishments or their use may not be changed in a
       way that can lead to an increased or new nuisance or that otherwise
       cause substantial interference with the environment unless the
       Franchise Board has granted permission under this Act or notification
       has been made to the authoritjf appointed by the government.
                                    193

-------
    The Ordinance Relating to Hazardous Wastes (1985:841) lists the following
solid or fluid wastes that are designated as hazardous wastes:

    •  oil waste;
    •  solvent agent waste;
    •  paint or lacquer waste;
    •  glue wastes;
    •  concentrated acid or alkaline waste;
    •  waste containing cadmium;
    •  waste containing mercury;
    •  waste containing antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium', lead, cobalt,
       copper, chrome, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, tin, vanadium, and
       zinc;
    •  waste containing cyanide;
    •  waste containing PCB;
    •  waste from means of control;
    •  laboratory waste.
    The National Environment Protection Board may also define other wastes as
hazardous.  Any person engaged in operations which generate hazardous wastes
is obliged to provide information to the authority stipulated by the National
Environmental Protection Board as to the nature, composition, quantity, and
manner of handling of wastes.  Hazardous waste may be finally disposed of com-
mercially only by Svensk Avfallskonventering Aktiebolag  - SAKAB  (the Swedish
Waste Conversion Company) or those who have been granted special permits.
    General binding standards occur very rarely in Swedish legislation on the
environment.  It is assumed that authorities will take into account- the
developments in technical and scientific fields and the  circumstances in
individual cases. There is reluctance on the part of the government to develop
threshold levels to guide site decontamination because such levels must be
considered on a. site  specific basis.  Preliminary guidelines have been
developed by the Nature Conservation Agency for permissible amounts of arsenic
in the soil and water (Eriksson  and Ingelstrom, 1984).
    Guidelines have been established to limit concentrations of  certain metals
in drinking water  (Swedish Drinking Water  Standards).  Although  surface water
provides the major source of drinking water, there is concern  for the
protection of ground  water as a  natural asset.
                                     194

-------
                                to
Contaminated Land

    Because of the low population
not been a major issue in Sweden.  S
areas where the demand is high for
some concern over what steps should
operation.  Communities have an i
not uncommon for local authorities
closure.
    A project entitled "Recycling of
financed in 1982 by the National
report from this effort, prepared by
architect Ann-Christine Ingelstrom (
at 20 land reuse sites in Sweden and
include gravel pits,  stone quarries,
with industrial waste, and old indus
illustrate some of the planning prin
to the recycling of land in urban ar
as reducing costs of land reuse (Err
  density,  the reuse of contaminated land has
   Sjome exceptions are sites in metropolitan
   land for new industry or housing.  There is
    be taken when an industrial plant ceases
important role in land use planning, and it is
      acquire sites following industry
                                 Land  in Heavily  Populated Areas" was
                             Council for Construction Research.  The final
                                 civil engineer Inga-May Eriksson and
                                 1984), includes descriptions of  experience
                                 two in Great Britain.  These examples
                                 municipal waste  disposal sites, sites
                                 ;rial areas.  The examples serve to
                                 =iples, problems, and solutions  relevant
                                 sas.  The following measures are mentioned
                                 csson and Ingelstrom, 1984, p. 8) :
*  "Appropriate shaping, dividing into stages, etc., in an early phase of
   the pit activity or waste disposal.  Later costs for adjustments and
   extra measures can be avoided! or reduced. .  .      ,
•  Successive subsequent treatment that suits the pit, quarry, or site for
   future utilization by using available machine equipment and surplus
   materials.                                   •    .
•  Joint planning with other construction projects that provide access to
   large areas of land at low costs.
•  Residual products from industry are used as replacements for soil or as
   soil enrichment.
•  Subsequent treatment is made permanent so that a minimum of
   supplementary measures and protection are required."
                                 195

-------
    A number of national committees have addressed issues related to contami-
nated land.  The Environment Protection Committee prepared a report on
problems of treatment of waste disposal sites (SOU 1983:20).  The Industrial
Reclamation Committee presented recommendations on reclamation after
industrial shutdowns (Bostadepartementet, 1982) .
    The Committee on a Fund for Environmental Damage has produced its final
report (SOU 1987:15) Miljoskadefond.  The suggested law would regulate two
areas, (1) damage to persons and property, and (2) a substantial portion of
remedial measures needed on problem sites.  The proposed .fund would be
financed by fees on emissions of listed substances for certain groups of
plants performing activities dangerous to the environment.  The fund would be
used for cases when no other means of financing is available.
    Contaminated land problems in Sweden stem from acid mine drainage from
mining of sulfide ores, from wood treatment operations, from the disposal of
municipal and industrial waste, and from the paper industry.  Environmental
problems arising from the paper industry  (which includes the forest and cellu-
lose industries) involves fibrous sediments called "banks" which have been
deposited in rivers.  These banks may comprise several hundred thousand cubic
meters of fibrous deposits, and tend to deplete the oxygen in the water
courses (increases the biological and chemical oxygen demand — BOD/COD),
Mercury used as a fungicide in the paper production is often present in these
deposits at varying concentrations ranging up to several thousand ppb.
Although legislation has been passed to prevent further deposits of wood fiber
waste in rivers, measures to remedy the existing banks have not yet been
undertaken.  There are at least 29 paper industry sites in Sweden that hcive
substantial problems with "banks" downstream.
    There are approximately 300 sites in Sweden that have been used for wood
treatment.  Originally this process was accomplished using creosote, but the
method iii more common use today involves chemical treatment with arsenic,
chromium, and copper.  At least one former wood treatment site has received
attention as a result of plans for reuse.
                                     196

-------
 Inventory of Hazardous Waste Sites

    The Central Organization of Swedish Communities has undertaken a
 nationwide  inventory of old dump sites that received wastes between 1940 and
 1970;   (The law restricting the placement of waste went into effect in  1969,
 so sites used after this time are monitored.)  An information request was  sent
out in March  1983 to each of the 280
received either municipal or  industr Lai wastes.  The data requested on each
site includes the location, responsible party, years of operation, types of
waste received, geological and hydro
Logical  conditions,  health or
communities has been compiled by the
 local  communities with sites  that
environmental effects, and current land use at the site.  Sites are rated
according to whether there are any problems or potential problems associated
with the waste disposal sites.  The information provided by the local
 County Administrations  and  submitted to
the Central Board.
    The national inventory of old duihps and landfills has now-been
accomplished.  The aim was to establish where such sites are situated and
which are known or suspected to contain substantial amounts of hazardous
wastes.  It is now possible to take this information into consideration in the
context of planning and land use.
    In many cases, it has not been possible to give a clear answer to the
question on presence of hazardous wastes.  Investigations will have to be
performed to elucidate which sites need to be tackled on the grounds of
content of hazardous wastes, ground conditions,  or neighborhood factors.
    In all, 3,800 sites have been registered,  most of then estimated to be of
rather limited interest apart from the planning aspect.  About 500 sites are
thought to contain marked amounts of
represent a (latent) threat to man ai
hazardous wastes or, in other aspects,
d the environment.
    The National Environmental Protection Board has issued recommendations  to
the communities and the county administrations as to the follow-up of the
initial inventory.  Around 20 dumps and similar sites should be tackled with
priority, and the 500 possible candidates should be measured and evaluated
within a period of 5 years.  (Personal communication, Olpv von Heidenstam,
1988, summarized from a report in Swedish.)
                                     197

-------
CASE STUDY: AUGUSTENDAL DUMPSITE, NACKA

    Nacka is a community of about 60,000 people located in the southeast
sector of the Stockholm archipelago, about 10 kilometers from Central
Stockholm.  Within Nacka, an area called Jarlaberg is being developed for
housing.  The Jarlaberg area includes the Augustendal municipal dumpsite,
portions of which will require remedial actions prior to site development.

Land Use History and Redevelopment Objectives

    The Augustendal dumpsite which was active from about 1940 until 1965, was
used mainly for the disposal of municipal waste and for demolition waste.
Some industrial waste was also disposed at Augustendal.  The volume of Wciste
deposited at the dump site' is estimated to be about 80,000 cubic meters
(104,800 cubic yards).  The dumpsite which covers about 2 hectares (5 acres),
is located in a valley with the waste deposited to a depth of 3 to 8 meters
(9.8 to 26 feet).  The surrounding area is hilly with a large amount of
surface rock and swampy valleys.
    The Nacka municipality decided in the late 1960's to develop new housing
in the Jarlaberg area.  Over a 4-year period, the 26 ha (65-acre) area weis
acquired by the municipality from private owners.  The city plan (Stadsplan)
for development of the area was established in 1983 and involves about 1100
residences in buildings with two to five floors.  These buildings will be
sited around court yards.  A lower and middle school will be built in the
central area of the site on the former Augustendal dumpsite.  Development of
the school on this central location is essential to the overall plan.  The HSB
housing cooperative is overseeing the development of the land.  The community
planning board is responsible for land use zoning.  The proposed use plan for
the Jarlaberg area is shown in Figure 23.
                                     198

-------
c
0)
JJ
14
3
Dl
3
0)
•C
4J
a
0
0)
4J
CO
1 1
0
.8
o
CO
•a
s
c
«
a













"g1
5
n
4J
10

-------
Nature and Extent of Contamination

    The municipality of Nacka has initiated several investigations to charac-
terize the waste at the Augustendal dumpsite and the seepage water issuing
from the site.  Information concerning the types of materials deposited at the
Augustendal site was obtained by interviewing firms that had used the
dumpsite.  Based on these interviews, investigators expected to find
contamination from paints, varnishes, and solvents, mercury (from a company
that produced fungicide for seeds), and other metals (e.g. from galvanizing
operations).
    Samples were collected from different depths from nine trial pits.  The
samples were analyzed for a variety of substances including organics,
chlorides, sulfides, cyanide, phenols, metals (cadmium, chromium, copper,
iron, lead, mercury, nickel, zinc), pH and methane.  The battery of testing
was carried out because of civil engineering concerns and also due to the
pressure of public opinion concerning the potential hazards associated with
contamination at the site.
    Analysis of the soil samples showed a neutral to alkaline pH.  Levels of
most parameters analyzed were not remarkable, although mercury was found in
one pit at a level of 71 ppm.  The range of contaminant levels found in soils
from the test pits are given in Table 13.  Levels found in normal soils and in
municipal waste sludge are listed for comparison.  A risk of methane
generation was determined to be present as a result of the decomposing
municipal waste.   One barrel containing contaminated oil was found on the
site.
    Seepage water from boreholes at the site was also sampled and analyzed.
Contaminant levels found in the seepage water are shown in Table 14.  The
Swedish Drinking Water Standards and levels of metals considered acceptable
for protection of fish are listed for comparison. The levels of metals and
other water quality parameters did not indicate any serious problems of
polluted water from the site.  Ground water contamination is not a major
concern at the site because the ground water in the area is already brackish
and likely contaminated as a result of leakage from a nearby petroleum
transfer station.
                                     200

-------
                        TABLE
                              13.   LEVELS OF CONTAMINANTS IN SOIL
                                 FROM THE AUGu|sTENDAL DUMPS ITEa
                 SAMPLES
Soil Parameter
(mg/kg dry soil)
PH
Chloride
Sulfate
Sulfide
Cyanide
Phenol
Mercury (Hg)
Cadmium (Cd)
Iron (Fe)
Zinc (Zn)
(Cu)
Lead (Pb)
Chromium (Cr)
Nickel (Ni)
Extractable organics
Range found
in samples
(mg/kg)
6.7 - 8.8
1,500 - 3,800
1,900 - 3,800
1-91
0.3 - 26
0.1 - 1.5
0.39 - 71
0.3 - 8.1
18 - 84
0.14 - 2.6
0.07 - 1.9
0.08 - 5.9
0.01 - 0.09
0.02 - 0.14
300 - 9,400
Levels in
normal soils



<10
< 5
< 1
0.06
0.22

63
15
16
16
9

Levels in
municipal
waste sludge






4-8
5-15

1,000 - 3,000 Copper
500 - 1,500
. 100 - 300
50 - 200
25 - 100

   Based on trial pit samples reported in 1980.
   Health Office during site visit, March 1985.
Report provided by the Nacka Environmental and
                       TABLE 14.  LEVELS OF CONTAMINANTS IN SEEPAGE WATER
                                 FROM THE AUGUSTENDAL DUMPS ITEa
Water Parameter
pH
Chloride
Sulfate
Sulfide
Bicarbonate
Calcium
Cyanide
Phenol
Mercury (Hg)
Cadmium (Cd)
Iron (Fe)
Zinc (Zn)
Copper (Cu)
Lead (Pb)
Chromium (Cr)
Nickel (Ni)
organics
Conductivity
(20 °C, us/cm)
Suspended solids
Range found
in samples
(mg/L)
6.9 - 7.2
455 - 1,300
415 - 918
<0.01 - 0.01
582 - 770
314 - 680
0.02
0.005 - 0.012
0.002 - 0.028
0.001 - 0.006
69 - 208
1.1 - 1.2
0.21 - 0.25
0.10 - 0.33
0.02 - 0.04
0.03 - 0.07
2.3 - 15

2,500 - 5,680
605 - 1,620
Swedish Drinking Level for ,
Water Standard protection
(mg/L) of fish (mg/L)









0.005 0.010
0.4
.1.0 0.1-0.5
0.05 0.02-0.1
0.10 0.01
0.05 0.02-0.1
0.1-0.5 Extractable




a Based on  levels measured in 1980.  Report  provided by the Nacka  Environmental  and Health Office
  during  site visit, March 1985.
                                              201

-------
Remediation Activities

    All waste material present on the intended school site was excavated down
to firm bottom  (as deep as 8 meters).  This excavation was carried out in
order to avoid the need for piles and to alleviate concern over problems with
methane generation.  The edges of the site excavation were sealed, and the
excavated cavity was filled with good engineering material.  The excavated
municipal and industrial waste were separated from demolition waste.  The
materials were also screened and sorted by size.
    The contaminated soil excavated from the school site was transported in
containers similar to dumpsters to a licensed disposal facility.  During the
soil excavation, water downstream from the site was monitored for
contamination.  Waste and soils determined to be nontoxic were trucked to the
opposite end of the valley and deposited as fill.  These materials amounted to
about 18,200 metric tonnes  (20,000 tons) or 25 to 30 percent of the total
amount of soil excavated.  Some wastes containing mercury were placed at the
bottom of the fill area and covered with lime followed by 40 centimeters of
clay.  The area receiving the fill material from the dumpsite is to be covered
with topsoil and grassed.  No major buildings are intended for this area.
    The HSB housing cooperative is responsible for the cleanup of the
dumpsite.  The contractor is Skanska.  The cost of the remediation effort at
the site is estimated to be about 1,500,000 Swedish Kroner ($140,000 U.S.)
 (Eriksson and Ingelstrom, 1984).

Site Reuse

    The Jarlaberg development plan calls for the construction of  1100
residences along with school buildings to be constructed on the former
dumpsite  (Eriksson and Ingelstrom, 1984).  The school construction is to be
overseen by the community, while the residential development will be carried
out by the HSB  housing cooperative.  A design competition was held for the,
housing development of the  southern section of the Augustendal site.  Models
of the proposed housing design  schemes were displayed in the offices of the
HSB.  Construction was scheduled to begin in 1985.  Development of the homes
                                     202

-------
and school is scheduled for completicn in 1987.  The estimated cost of the
development is 500,000,000 Kroner  (about $45,400,000 U.S.).  The cost of the
waste removal and site cleanup is expected to increase the price of homes
built on the site by about 1 percent.

Criteria for Cleanup
    Levels of contaminants in solid vaste and soils from the Augustendal site
were compared to normal  (uncontaminaned) soil levels and to levels permissible
in municipal waste sludge.  These levels are shown in Table 13.. Some 41
percent of the municipal sludge produced in Sweden is spread on agricultural
land.  Thus comparison of the contaminant levels in soils with permissible
concentrations in municipal sludge provides an indication of the acceptability
of these wastes and soils for use as
do not pertain to engineering propert
    Contaminant levels in seepage water were compared to the Swedish Drinking
Water Standards and to levels determined safe for aquatic life.  These levels
are shown in Table 14.
CASE STUDY: BT-KEMI PLANT, MALMO
  .  The BT-Kemi facility located nort|h
produced pesticides and herbicides
was closed by the Swedish Environmental
noncompliance with environmental
river, the Braan River, and covers
downriver from the plant is
BT-Kemi site was the first remedial
     legislation.
       about
predominantly
         fill material. ' These comparison criteria
         ies of the excavated materials.
   of the city of Malmo in southern Sweden
   approximately 11 years before the plant
    Protection Board in 1977 for
           The plant site borders a small
     10 hectares (24.7 acres).  The area
      agricultural land.  Cleanup of the
action project in Sweden.
                                     203

-------
Land Use History and Redevelopment Objectives

    From 1966 through 1977, the BT-Kemi plant produced large quantities of
phenoxy acid herbicides through the chlorination and condensation of phenol
and cresol.  (Phenoxy acids include 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T; it is suspected that
                                          V  <>*
2,3,7,8-TCDD may also be formed as a contaminant in the process.)  The plant
operations were carried out in a former sugar refinery which had operated from
about 1907.  Signs of pollution at the plant site were observed soon after the
plant began production.  Throughout the plant's operation, there was almost
continuous involvement with various environmental protection authorities
because of mishandling of wastes at the site.  Wastewater from the production
of phenoxy acids was collected in holding ponds on the site.  Solid wastes
were treated and buried on site as well.
    Cleanup of the site was initiated in order to protect the river and ground
water in the area from further contamination.  Some redevelopment of the site
for light, nonpolluting industry was also intended.

Nature and Extent of the Contamination

    In 1975, some,200 chemical drums containing high concentrations of .cfaloro-
phenols and phenoxy acids were found on the site (Solyom, 1983, p. 342) .
Further investigation in 1977 revealed additional drums  (approximately 600
total) on the site, many of which were corroded and leaking into the ground.
In addition, highly polluted water from two holding lagoons as well as
discarded drums and other sources was found to be leaking into the Braan
River.
    The responsibility for the site investigation and cleanup of the BT-Kemi
site was taken over by the County Administration who in turn commissioned
detailed investigations by the Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL).
These studies focused on assessment of the contamination of ground water and
the river, wastewater in the holding lagoons, contaminated soil, highly
contaminated wastes stored in drums and tanks, residual chemicals in the
factory, and contamination of the factory building and processing equipment
(Solyom, 1983,  p. 343) .  Multiple drain lines beneath the site further
complicated the site investigation.
                                     204

-------
     Some 250 samples from 140 boreholes were taken to assess the extent of the
 soil contamination.   Results of this survey indicated that the area contained
 about 150,000 cubic  meters of contaminated soil containing phenoxy acids,
 chlorinated acids, cresols,  chlorophenols,  and dinitro-sec-butyl phenol
 (DNBP),  and dioxihs  at levels up to 500 ppm.   The contamination extended from
 the  surface to a depth of 2  to 6 meters, (Solyom,  1983,  p.  343),
     Three groups of  soils were distinguished based on the  level of contamina-
 tion;  the quantities of contaminated materials were as  follows:
     Low concentration  (<  50 ppm):  130
                                 ,000 cubic meters;
                                      ,000 cubic meters.
Medium concentration (50 to 500 ppm): 15,000 cubic meters;
High concentration (> 500 ppm): 2
(Solyom, 1983, p. 344).
It was found that both the dumpsi
                                      :e and the piping beneath the site .were
leaking chemical contaminants  into ths river.  It was determined that the
maximum seepage rate  from the  area was 7.5 cubic meters per hour  (Solyom,
1983, p. 343).  Heavy contamination was found in both ground water at the.site
and in river water.   Chemical  analyses of samples of river water showed
phenoxy acids to be increased  by factors of 5 to 25 depending on the rainfall
in the area. .Pollutants leaking into the river began to cause serious damage
to crops irrigated with the water in the area downstream of the plant.  -
    Ten of 107 private wells tested ii the vicinity of the plant were found to
be contaminated (although it is not certain that all of the contamination
originated with the BT-Kemi plant.  Chlorinated phenols,  phenoxy acids/  and
DNBP were found at levels of 0.2 to 3
were believed to be directly affected
                                  ug/L.   Four of the contaminated wells
                                  by the contamination in the Braan River.
    Pour aquifers were found to be present in the area of the plant.  It was
determined through chemical analyses that the two uppermost aquifers were con-
taminated, the first (uppermost) through plant activity,  and the second
through cross contamination with the first via a borehole used in the site
investigation.  The lower aquifers were not contaminated.

-------
Remediation Activities
    Cleanup of the site was begun in the summer of 1978.  The main production
building located on the south side of the BT-Kemi site was demolished.  Some
of the demolition material was moved to the opposite side of the railway.  The
site was covered with clean topsoil and grassed.  Some light industrial
buildings were later erected on the site.
    Immediate action was needed in order to protect the river from further
contamination.  A drainage system enclosed by a bentonite shield was installed
around the area to prevent infiltration of water.  A 15 percent bentonite
slurry was injected through a series of perforated pipes to form a curtain
wall.  To seal off the area from the river, a slurry cutoff wall  (bentonite)
extending down to the underlying clay strata was installed.  By the following
summer, the leakage of contaminants from the site had abated.
    The drainage water in the holding pond was collected and treated using an
activated charcoal treatment system which had been installed by BT-Kemi while
the plant was in operation.  This method of treatment was found to be more
efficient than alternative methods such as chemical flocculation, solvent
extraction, and biological treatment.  The level of phenoxy acids in the
drainage water was reduced from 190 ppm to less than 0.1 ppm while the level
of chlorophenols was reduced from 12 ppm to less than 0.01 ppm  (Solyom,  1983,
p. 343) .  After treatment, the water was discharged to  the municipal sewage
treatment plant.  Temporary problems occurred in the system when  pollutant
concentrations were lowered sufficiently to permit bacteria to grow on the
carbon  filters, clogging the system.  Spent charcoal from the process was sent
to England for regeneration.
    In  1982,  the activated charcoal filtering was discontinued when the
organic chemical level in the drainage water reached about 0.9 ppm.  The water
was then piped directly to a municipal treatment plant  about 20 kilometers
from  the site.  Water  from the BT Kemi site significantly increased the  load
on the  municipal treatment plant, comprising about 1 to 8 percent of  the total
volume  of water handled.
    Liquid wastes  from the site containing low  concentrations of  organic
chemicals were pumped  to a holding tank  or directly to  the activated  charcoal
filtration system.  More concentrated  liquid wastes were incinerated  in  a
cement  kiln at a cost  of about  $100 U.S. per ton  (Solyom, 1983, p. 344).
                                     206

-------
     The technique of forced leaching
 through an infiltration ditch was
 selected for cleanup of the contaminated soil at the BT Kemi site.  Leaching '
 was found to be effective for.removiig 80 to 90 percent of the chemicals from
 the low and medium contaminated soils,  although it does not remove 2,4,5-
 trichlorophenol.   IVL estimated that
 years to complete,  at a cost of $2.5
 the leaching process would take 5 to 6
 million.   After 6 years,  the
 concentrations of chemicals had reached acceptable industrial effluent levels.
 Recent readings,  however,  have indicated that contamination levels are up,
 possibly due to an unusually cold wi iter in Sweden during 1984-85 in which the
 ground was  frozen down to 1.2  meters
 and thawing action could release  con
   It  is  suggested that  extreme freezing
:aminants bound in the soil  and create new
countries  for  incineration  since, at
pathways  through which contaminants  could travel.   (Solyom,  1985,  Personal
Communication).
    High  contamination waste was  sto::ed and  eventually  transported to  other
 the time,  incineration was not allowed  in
Sweden.  Some  90 drums  containing  low-level dioxin-contaminated waste  still
remain at the  site  since no acceptable means of disposal of this waste have
been found.

Site Reuse

    The state  came  into possession of this property because the chemical
company went bankrupt.  As a result,
leases out some new buildings on the
the period from 1977 through September 1985 amounted to 36 million Swedish
Kroner (about $6 million U.S.).
    Cleanup of the south ,side of the
BT-Kemi site was undertaken to allow the
development of the site for new nonpclluting light industry.  Following the
demolition and removal of the main production building, very little contamina-
tion remained on the site of the old
erected to house small workshops and
the community took over the site and now
site.  Total expenditure on the site over
buildings.  Some small buildings were
a. stone company.
                                    207

-------
Criteria for Cleanup

    The public concern over the contamination problems at the BT Kami site was
an important factor in the site cleanup.  Information on the project was made
available to the public throughout the investigation and cleanup.  A, risk.
assessment of health and environmental effects was performed to allay public
concerns regarding residual contamination at the site.  It was determined that
the degree of contamination found in well water samples in the vicinity did
not pose any risk to public health.  A health investigation of people-living
near the site also did not detect symptoms attributable to the activities of
the BT-Kemi plant  (Solyorn, 1983, p. 343).
    In 1972, a target cleanup  level of 0.5 mg/L was set by the authorities for
aqueous discharges to the Braan River.  At the time, this level was considered
to be quite stringent and was  established partly in response to the actions of
environmental groups.  Since that time, however, the quality of the River has
been vastly improved, and no discharges to the River are now permitted
 (Solyom, 1985, Personal Communication).  -All drainage from the site must be
routed to the municipal sewer.  Criteria have not been set to determine when
to discontinue the forced leaching at the site.
    Biological tests on the wastewater performed in 1982 and in  1984  show the
need to further  reduce the levels of phenoxy acids and chlorophenols  to less
than 0.01 Ug/L to  fully eliminate the risk for damage to higher  forms of
 flora.   (Personal  communication, Olov von Heidenstam, January 1988.)

 Follow-Up;  The  Site Conditions  in  1988

     (The  information below was provided by Mr. Olov von Heidenstam,  January
 1988.)
    The present  level  of  phenoxy acids  and chlorophenols  in  the  Braan River
 is, as a yearly  mean,  0.05 |4.g/L.  There are  considerable  season  variations,
 and sometimes,  the measurements  are of  the  level of  several  micrograms  per
 liter.  Further  reduction is  a slow process  (hyperbolic  function)  and for the
 foreseeable future,  say  at  least to the year 2000,  there  is  a need for  con-
 tinued treatment.   The costs  for pumping,  treatment,  and  analysis, etc.,  is
 around 300,000  Swedish Kronor per year ($50,000).   The  treated  volume is
 around 30,000 m3 per year.
                                     208

-------
    The county administration in Malnio
Protection Board have investigated the
that would do better than the one now
    To complete the picture, it should
herbicides are used on the surrounding
is a measurable level of phenoxy acids
Nevertheless, the decisions taken are
from BT Kemi premises.
                                    209
 and the National Environmental
 matter.and do not see any other method
applied.
 be remembered that,  as long as
 fields and the fields upstreams, there
 and chorophenols in the Braan River.
for continued treatment of the waste

-------
                                 REFERENCES
Bostadepartementet, 1982.  Sanering after industrinedlaggningar  (Restoration
After Industrial Closings). SOU:1982:-10 Department of Housing.  Stockholm,
March 1982.

Eriksson, I. and A. Ingelstrom, 1984.  Ateranvandning av mark it
atortsomraden, 22  exempel, Byggforskningsradet  (Reuse of Land in Populated
Areas.)  Swedish Council  for Construction Research, Stockholm, Liber Printing,
Stockholm.  ISBN 91- 540-4264-X.  Translated  from Swedish for the EPA by:
SCITRAN, Santa Barbara, CA, TR  85-0092, 126 pp.

National Swedish Environment Protection Board,  Technical Department, 1982.
"Control of Water  and  Solid Waste Pollution in  Sweden."  Presented  at the
Fourth Joint Meeting of the Oslo and  Paris Commissions, Copenhagen, June  1982.
Report snv pm 1691, June  1983,  37 pp.  Available from Statens Naturvardsverk
Biblioteket, Box 1302, S-171 25, Solna, Sweden.

Solyom,  P., 1983.   "The Case Story  of the BT-Kemi Dumpsite."  In:   Proceedings
Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous  Waste Sites.   October  31 -  November  2,
1983, Washington,  D.C.,   pp. 342  -  345.
                                      210

-------
 INTRODUCTION
     The  Kingdom of The  Netherlands is
 Europe.   Smaller than the State of N<
 41,160 square kilometers  (15,892 squc
 13 million.   The land is  essentially
                                     SECTION  6
                                  THE NETHERLANDS
 the most  densely populated country in
w York, The Netherlands encloses some
re miles)  with a population of more than
flat throughout most of the country.  The
 Netherlands (Figure 24)  is  bordered ty the  Federal Republic  of Germany to the
 east and  Belgium to the  south.   The North Sea encloses the north and west.
 The western part of The  Netherlands lies below sea level, in some places by as
 much as 6.7 meters (22 feet).   Much of the  land is reclaimed from the North
 Sea.  About half of the  land area is polderland,  artificially drained and
 surrounded  by  dykes.
     The Netherlands is a parliamentary democracy under a constitutional
 monarch.  The  parliament, known as Staten-Generaal (States-General),  consists
 of a First  Chamber comprising 75 members elected by the councils  of the
 provinces and  a  Second Chamber  of 150  directly  elected members.   Parliament
 shares legislative power with the crown.   The country is divided  into 11
 provinces with directly elected administrative  councils and a government-
 appointed chairman.   The provinces control the municipalities within  their
 borders and also the  district water-control boards.   There are 865
 municipalities,  and these are the most  important  local government
 institutions.
Authors' Note:  The information provided in this Section was obtained during a visit to The
Netherlands in March 1985.  Dr. Dick Hoogendoorn of the National Institute for Public Health and
Environmental Hygiene hosted our visit and accompanied us on several site visits. We met with
Mr. Martin Koen and Mr. Lidth*de-Jeude of the.Ministry Of Housing,  Physical Planning, and the
Environment to discuss the Dutch policy and legislation on contaminated land.  We also visited
the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TOO)  escorted by Dr. Wim Rulkens.
Site visits included the Tilburg Gas Works site
Merwedepolder housing site in Dordrecht.
 the Rotterdam Harbor sites, and the
                                       211

-------

Figure 24.  Map of The Netherlands (courtesy of the National Geographic
            Society).
                                   212

-------
     In spite of a scarcity of natural mineral resources (except for natural
 gas).  The Netherlands is a highly industrialized nation.   Metal manufacturing
 (iron and steel and aluminum)  is the
most  important  industry.  The  chemical
 industry has increased 10-fold between the late 1940's and the early 1970's.
 Natural gas,  discovered during the 1950's,  has had a major influence on the
 Dutch economy.   Shipping is of special .importance; the deep water ports on the
 North Sea and the Rhine and Maas Rivers provide access to central and eastern
 Europe.   Rotterdam Harbour handles more tonnage than any other harbour in the
 world.   Some 5630 kilometers (3,500 ikiles)  of inland waterways link The
 Netherlands  with German,  Belgian,  and French systems.
     The  contaminated land problem in
 attention  in 1978  with the discovery
the Netherlands first came to public
of serious soil contamination under homes
 in  the  town  of  Lekkerkerk.   Subsequent  investigations  led  to  the  discovery of
 contaminated sites  throughout  the  country.

 Extent  of the Contaminated Land Problem
    Contaminated  land  in The Netherlands  is viewed as a. very serious problems
because of the high population density, the relative scarcity of land, the
high water table  in many parts of the country, and the  reliance on ground
water for drinking supplies.  Ground
water is of special concern in the
Netherlands as approximately 65 percent of the potable water is abstracted
from ground water  (Lewis et al., 1987).  Because of the scarcity of land in
the Netherlands, every site is needed.  Many sites," particularly in the
municipalities, have been used multiple times.  Every site is reused rather
than abandoned.  In some cases, land
to be contaminated.
    A survey of contaminated sites, undertaken in 1980 on initiative of the
Ministry of Public Health and Environmental Protection, identified more than
4,000 potentially contaminated sites.
some 350 sites.  The major types of Contaminated sites in the 1980-81
inventory are as follows:
     •  waste dumps (76.9 percent);
     »  former factories and manufacturing plants (13.8 percent);
     •  former gas works (5.8 percent);
     »  other sources (3.5 percent).
                                    213
is already in reuse when it is recognized
 and remedial action was deemed urgent at

-------
    Two main criteria (van Lidth de Jeude, 1982) were applied in assigning the
order of urgency to these sites—
     1.  immediate danger for public health (e.g., housing estates, drinking
         water areas, building sites, recreation areas); and
     2.  immediate danger for environmental pollution  (e.g., nature reserves).
    The inventory indicated the need for a legal framework,and a major
financial commitment to begin to remedy the contaminated land problem.  It is
now known that there are, in fact, many more than 4,000 potentially
contaminated sites.  It is estimated that urgent cleanup measures are needed
at 1,170 sites.  In 1981, about 350 investigations and 30 cleanup operations
were started.  Expenditures for this effort amounted to about f50 million
Dutch guilders  ($20 million U.S.).

The Legal Framework for Dealing With Contaminated Land

    The Soil Protection Bill was  submitted to  Parliament in December  1980.
This Bill provides for a  5-year  "program  of measures aimed at protecting the
soil."  The program  is to be overseen by  the Ministry  of Housing,  Physical
Planning, and the Environment.  The policy regarding soil protection  is that
the soil must retain  its  ability  to perform a  wide variety of functions
adequately.  Soil is  considered  to be the solid part of the environment with
the enclosed water,  ground water,  air,  and organisms.  A short-term policy
objective is the creation of ground water protection areas.
    The soil protection program  emphasizes prevention  of soil quality
deterioration  (by preventing the occurrence of new  sources  of contamination)
and encourages  remedial  actions  where necessary (Ministry of Housing,  Physical
Planning, and  the Environment,  1984b).   Remedial actions undertaken under  the
soil  cleanup program are aimed at removing  the contaminants  from the  soil
rather than simply  excavating  the soil  and  moving it to a new  location
 (Hoogendoorne,  1984,  p.  569).   The Provincial  and Local authorities are
responsible for implementing the soil protection policies.   [Note: The Soil
 Protection Bill became law on  January 1,  1984.]
                                      21.4

-------
      Recognizing that  the  Soil  Protection Bill would require  several years to
 pass through both the Upper and Lowir  Houses of  Parliament,  a separate  bill
 was  introduced  to deal with remedial action in a more  immediate  fashion.   The
 Soil Clean-Up (Interim) Act of 29 December 1982  (which came  into force  in
 January 1983) contains temporary regulations concerning remedial action in
 cases of soil contamination (Ministjy  of  Housing, Physical Planning, and  the
 Environment,  1984a).   Under this AcJ the  Provincial Authorities  are required
 to submit to  the Ministry of Housinc,  Physical Planning, and  the Environment
 each year a cleanup program to deal with  soil contamination.  The Soil  Clean-
 Up Act was incorporated in the Soil
 is responsible for implementing the
 cleanup programs from the Provincial
 failing to take adequate measures to
Protection Bill that became law in 1984.
     A cleanup program runs for a period of 5 years and covers all the
 instances of severe soil contamination within each province.  The program
 should indicate the cases that are teing considered for investigation or
 cleanup for the first year, the measures to be taken,  and an estimate of the
 costs.   Each province,  in consultation with the Municipal Authorities
 concerned,  develops its own prioritiss for site cleanups.  A general summary
 of activity is projected for the remaining 4 years.   The provincial executive
cleanup program.   After receiving the
 Authorities,  the Ministry determines
 which cases will be considered for remedial measures or investigations with
 Central  Government assistance.
     The  cost of cleanup operations is  normally shared by Central  Government,
 the  provinces,  the municipalities,  and certain industries.   It  is assumed that
 the  Central Government  and the  provinces have  a collective  responsibility for
                                     prevent  chemical  substances  from being
deposited  in or on the ground  (Dresden,  1984, p. 6).   In the past, provinces
together with the municipalities grailted licences for  waste dumping.  The
municipalities bear responsibility for failing to apply  (adequately) existing
legislation  (e.g., the Nuisance Act).
cleanup costs is a basic amount  (based on population) plus 10 percent of the
remaining, costs (Dresden, 1984, p. 6)
Environmental Protection contributes
percent) of the cleanup operations.
   The Ministry of Health and
the remaining costs (approximately 90
The Ministry in consultation with the
  The municipal contribution to site
Provincial Authority, may order the person with rights to a property on which
the source of contamination is situated to take appropriate measures to

                                    215

-------
eliminate the source or to restrict the contamination and its effects as far
as possible.  In some instances, an industry is responsible for paying the
cost of cleanup.  In such cases, the government will collect the payment from
the responsible party after the cleanup is completed.  This policy avoids
delays that might occur if negotiations regarding payment preceded the cleanup
operations.
    The Central Government has budgeted f2 billion Dutch guilders (about $700
million U.S.) for the program over a 15 year period to provide for site clean-
ups and also for the Central Government's program in research, standards
development, analysis, and coordination to ensure consistency among provinces
in the cleanup efforts.  In order to reach decisions regarding allocation of
funds, the relative needs and priorities of the various provinces are examined
and compared.
    The Interim Indicative Multi-Year Soil Protection Program 1984-1988  (V-
IMP) is a forerunner of the 5-year programs, although it has no statutory
basis since the Soil Protection Bill was not 'yet law at the time the program
was drawn up.  The Ministry's projections show completion of all initial
investigations by 1989 with all final cleanups completed by 1997.  The steps
involved for each site for which cleanup action is indicated and the mean
costs are given below:

     •   Initial investigation	f!2,276  ($3,432 U.S., based  on
         1985 Foreign Exchange  Rates);
     •   Evaluation of nature and extent	flOO,000  ($279,600 U.S.);
     •   Evaluation of technical options	fl!5,196  ($322,090 U.S);
     •   Cleanup action	'•	f989,223  ($2,766,000 U.S.);
     •   Continuing control measures	f!63,827  ($458,060 U.S.).

Assessment  Guidelines

    Factors involved  in assessing whether contamination at a  site poses  a
serious threat  to public health or  the  environment are the nature and
concentrations  of the  contaminating substances present.  Under the  Soil  Clean-
up  (Interim) Act of  1983,  the Ministry  of Housing, Physical  Planning,  and  the
Environment (1983a) developed guidelines to be used  in site  investigations to
                                     216

-------
     TABLE 15.  GUIDELINES FOR SITE .ASSESSMENT  '
  DEVELOPED  BY  THE MINISTRY  OF  HOUSING,  PHYSICAL
PLANNING AND THE ENVIRONMENT UNDER THE SOIL CLEANUP
                                   . *
               (INTERIM)
ACT OF 1983


Component
I









II

Metals
Chromium
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Cadmium
Tin
Barium
Mercury
Lead
Soil
A
100
20
50
50
200
20
10
1
20
200
0
50
(mg/kg)
B C
250

:
800
50 BOO
100 BOO
100 500
500 3000
30 50
40 BOO
.5 20
50 BOO
'400 2]000
.5 2 10
150
Inorganic Constitutes (Nonmet<
NH4 (as N)
F (total)
CN (free)
CN
200
1
5
500
ils)
400 2000
10 100
so koo
Groundwater (|ig/l)
A
20
20
20
20
50
10
5
1
10
50 '
0.2
20
200
300
5
10
B
50
50
50
50
200
30
20
2.5
30
100
0.5
50
1000
1200
30
50
C
200
200
200
200
800
100
100
10
150
500
2
200
3000
4000
100
200
F (total)
CN (free)
CN
(complexed)
S (total)
Br (total)
P04 (as P)
III Aromatics
i
Benzene
Etylbenzene
Toluene
Xylene
Phenol
Aromatics
(total)
200
1
5

2
20
—


0.01
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.1

400 2000
10 100
so koo

20
50
_


0.5
5
3
5
1
7


200
300
—


5
50
30
50
10
70

300
5
10

10
100
50


0.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1

1200
30
50

100
500
200


1
20
15
20
15
30

4000
100
200

300
2000
700


5
60
50
60
50
100

                                                      (Continued)

-------
TABLE 15.  (Continued)
Soil (mg/kg)
Component A B
IV Polvcyclic Hydrocarbons
Naphthylene 0.1 5
Anthracene 0.1 10
Phenanthrene 0.1 10
Pluoranthene 0.1 10
Pyrene 0.1 10
3,4 - Benz- 0.05 1
pyrene
Polycylclic 1 20
Hydrocarbons
(total)
V Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Chlorinated 0.1 5
aliphatics
(individual)
Chlorinated 0.1 7
aliphatics
(total)
Chlorobenzene 0.05 1
( individual )
Chlorobenzenes 0.05 2
(total)
Chlorophenol 0.01 0.5
( individual )
Chlorophenol 0.01 1
(total)
Polychlor- 0.05 1
inated
Compounds
(total)
PCB's 0.05 1
(total)
EOCL (total) 0.1 8
C

50
100
100
100
100
10

200



50


70


10

20

5

10

10



10

80
Groundwater
A

0.2
0.1
0.1
0.02
0.02
0.01

0.2



1

'
1


0.02

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.01



0.01

1
(W/D
B

7
2
2
1
1
0.2

10



10


15


0.5

1

0.3

0.5

0.2



0.2

15

C

30
10
10
5
5
1

40



50


70


2

5

1.5

2

1



1

70
                                        (Continued)
          218

-------
                             TABLE  15.
(Continued)
Soil
Component A
.VI Toxic Pesticide
Chlorinated 0
Organics
(individual)
Chlorinated 0
Organics
(total)
Pesticide 0
(total)
(mg/kg)
B
Products
.1 0.5


.1 1


.1 2

VII Other Contaminants
Tetrahydro- 0
furan
Pyridine 0
Tetrahydro- 0
thiophene
Cyclohex- 0
anone
Styrene 0
Gasoline 20
Mineral 100
Oil
.1 4

.1 2
.1 5

.1 6 '

.1 5
100

C

5


10


20

40

20
50

60

50
800
1000 5000


Groundwater (|ig/l)
A B C

0.05 0.2 1


0.1 0.5 2


0.1 15

0.5 20 60

0.5 10 30
0.5 20 60

0.5 15 50

0.5 20 60
10 40 150
20 200 600

*  Source:  Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and Environment, 1983
                                       219

-------
assess the degree of contamination.  These guidelines, made public in 1983,
are given in Table 15.  The values are intended to be used for site assessment
and are not to be interpreted as standards for site cleanup.
    For each chemical constituent, the guidelines specify three different con-
centration levels, A, B, and C, applicable to soil and three levels applicable
to ground or surface waters.  Level A is the reference value; level B is the
comparison value to determine if further investigation is needed; level C, if
exceeded, suggests the need for .cleanup.  If the concentration is below level
C, there is probably no urgent requirement for cleanup measures.  The need for
cleanup action must consider the local situation regarding the extent to which
the contamination might spread or affect local residents and the use and
function of the soil  (Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning, and the
Environment, 1983a, p. 2).
    Soil contamination means there is a chemical in the ground exceeding the
level normally expected to occur.  The reference level A may be regarded as an
indicative value above which there is positive contamination.  For naturally
occurring constituents, the Level A reference values  for soil correspond to
the "mean" background concentration found in the Netherlands.  The actual
background level at a specific site may differ from this "mean" level, and it
may be advantageous to use the actual measured background level as the
reference value.  For substances that do not occur naturally, the reference
values correspond to detection limits that can be achieved by current
analytical methods.
    The reference values for ground water' reflect the quality norms for deep
ground water and for surface water intended for the production of drinking
water.  These levels reflect the standards of the European Community  (EC)  for
drinking water  (EC, 1980) .
    The constituents addressed by the guidelines are  recognized as indicators
of contamination.  Cases are known where  these constituents are important.
The government does not  intend to extend  the list of  contaminants addressed by
the guidelines, although a new chemical may be added  as the need arises.   For
example, in March  1985,  a particular site was found to be contaminated with
aniline dyes; this necessitated development of a guideline  for aniline.  To
                                     220

-------
develop the guideline, a literature
search was performed to compile data on
toxicity, solubility, and bioaccumulation.  These properties were then related
to other chemicals for which guidelines were already set, and values for the
A, B, and C levels were established.
    With regard to soil contamination, a distinction is made between those
substances that are so harmful that
they must be prevented from coming into
contact with the soil wherever possible  (black list substances) and those that
may be deposited on or in the soil providing that strict requirements are met
(grey list compounds).  The Soil Protection Act calls for a  "black" and a
"grey" list of contaminants to be drawn up.  "Black" list substances will
include for example, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, perchlorethylene, and
trichloroethane (Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning, and the Environment,
1984b).
Approach to Site Cleanup
    It is the policy of the Dutch government to support efforts to develop new
techniques for soil reconstruction and to test these techniques.  Soil recon-
struction techniques include all technical measures taken to rectify or limit
the harmful consequences of soil pollution for man, the environment, and the
use of the soil.  The National Institute for the Provision of Drinking Water
was requested by the Ministry of Put lie Health and the Environment to produce
a "Handbook for Soil Reconstruction Techniques."  The Handbook compilation is
intended to make available the actual, up-to-date, knowledge and experience in
the development and application of soil reconstruction techniques.  The
Handbook is contained in a loose-leaf system designed for frequent update.
The first volume was scheduled to be
Housing, Physical Planning, and the
 published in 1984 by the Ministry of
Environment (1983b).s  Reconstruction
techniques may be classified as techniques whereby the pollution is removed
(removal of the source) or techniques whereby the spread of the pollution is
obstructed (cutting of the path).
    Possibilities for cleanup include eradication, isolation, or change in the
use of the area.  In 1985, the criteria for cleanup of contaminated sites were
                                     221

-------
very flexible because of the financial constraints.  The Dutch government made
available annually up to f!92 million Dutch guilders ($60 million U.S.) for
the period 1984 - 1986 for site cleanup -activities  (Hoogendoorne, 1984, p..
569) and funded research into cost-effective means of dealing with
contaminated soil, including thermal treatment, extraction of contaminants
using solvents, and treatment of soil with microbial agents.
    The capacity of cleanup installations in The Netherlands is insufficient
to treat all the excavated contaminated soil from site cleanups.  As a result,
storage of a considerable amount of material is necessary while awaiting proc-
essing.  It is estimated that The Netherlands has 1.5 million tons of contami-
nated soil from old gas works and an even greater quantity of soil polluted
with oil  (Groundwater Newsletter, 1986).
    The most appropriate engineering solution to a  contaminated site problem
is not always acceptable to inhabitants in the area.  For example, a
particular site investigation may indicate a technically appropriate solution
to be removal of 1 meter of soil, fill with clean sand, and pump off leachate
and surface water.  However, people living in the vicinity of the site may not
be satisfied with this solution because of fear of  exposure to toxic
chemicals.  The only acceptable solution to the inhabitants may be relocation,
requiring the government to buy the properties affected by the contamination.

CASE STUDY:  LEKKERKERK

    In 1978, severe soil contamination was discovered under a new housing
development at Lekkerkerk, a small village some 16  kilometers  (10 miles)
northeast of Rotterdam on  the River Lek.  The village is situated in a
reclaimed coastal swamp area.  A dense  network of ditches for drainage of the
area was  later filled with household refuse as well as  industrial waste.
Dumping to  fill in the ditches continued through 1970.  Houses were then
constructed on the filled  area.  The Lekkerkerk West District, the site of the
contamination, covers an area of 8.9 hectares  (22  acres) on the  Schuwacht
polder.  The experience at Lekkerkerk has been compiled in a document  entitled
 "Operation  Lekkerkerk West"  (Hoomans and Stellingwerff,  1982), and much of the
information supplied here  is taken  from this report.
                                     222

-------
bungalows on a  foundation of wooden
Site History
    A total of 268 houses—193 on concrete  foundations,  64  in  rows, and  11
         piles with concrete  cross members--were
affected by the contaminated soil and waste  (Stellingwerff,  1982, p.  15).  A
school and gymnasium were also  located in the area.  The ground  in the area is
very soft, so that piles up to  17 meters  (56 feet) high are  normally  used
beneath the houses.

Nature and Extent of the Contamination
    Excavations uncovered a significant amount of chemical waste, as well as
rubble, wood, and household waste.  Chemical waste was both loose and in con-
tainers and sacks.  Few of the labelk on the containers were readable.  In
some cases the original 'ditches had been deepened and broadened to accommodate
the refuse.  Soils adjacent to the f
         Llled-in trenches were polluted.  "Also
pits filled with waste were found bezween the trenches in some places.
Pollutants were found beneath houses
protection provided by plastic sheet
(Brinkmann and Kruijdenberg, 1982, p
         just below the floor, with the only
         Lng covered by a thin layer of sand
         . 91).  Air samples from the creep (crawl)
spaces of selected homes showed the presence of aromatic compounds, toluene
and xylene.  Vapors released during the excavations showed aromatic compounds
(toluene, xylene) in concentrations as high as 1,000 ppm (Brinkmann and
Kruijdenberg, 1982, p. 90).
    A total of 1651 containers were found, some of which contained residual
chemicals (Borst and Ferns, 1982, p.
deposited at Lekkerkerk have been estimated as follows (Brinkmann and
Kruijdenberg, 1982, p. 98):
         building industry
         paints and varnish
         paint spraying
manufacture
         103).  The origins of the refuse
30 percent;
25 percent;
1.0 percent;
                                     223

-------
         plastics manufacture and processing
         chemical industry
         printing ink manufacture and application
         other
10 percent;
10 percent;
10 percent; and
5 percent.
    Ground water released from shallow depths during the excavation work and
surface water percolating through the polluted soils were highly polluted with
heavy metals and organics including aromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, ketones,
and esters.  The waters sometimes had a penetrating odor and an oil-like
appearance.  Treatment was required prior to discharge to the aqueous
environment.  Water in the mains was found to contain high concentrations of
toluene and xylene after standing for 12 hours.  Apparently the aromatic
hydrocarbons entered the low density polyethylene (LDPE) pipes through
diffusion.  Levels of pollutants found in soil and water samples from the site
are listed in Tables 16 and 17, respectively.  Groundwater at deep levels
(down to 30 meters) was not polluted.

Remediation Activities

    In April 1980, government bodies, the Province of Zuid-Holland, and the
Lekkerkerk Local Authorities decided that all waste material dumped in the
Lekkerkerk-West region should be removed within the shortest possible time.
The Provincial Water Board of Zuid-Holland was responsible for technical
coordination of the excavation and filling operations.  The work involved
three phases—excavation, filling, and reconstruction.  During the cleanup,
environmentalists provided continuous supervision, evaluation of pollutants,
sample taking, and environmental hygiene.  A basic requirement set forth by
the Minister for Public Health and Environmental Hygiene was that all waste
materials and polluted soil from Lekkerkerk had to be processed in The
Netherlands.  Complete evacuation of the inhabitants was ordered so that
reconstruction could begin on June 1, 1980.
    The area was divided into five sections, and only one phase of the
remediation work was carried out at a time in each section.  The sequence of
tasks is described below (Stellingwerff, 1982, p. 18):
                                     224

-------
  TABLE 16.   POLLUTANTS DETERMINED I.
                           SOIL SAMPLES FROM THE LEKKERKERK SITE
          Pollutant
                        Concentration (mg/kg of soil)
 ORGANICS+

 Benzene

 Toluene

 Ethylbenzene

 m-, p-Xylene

 o-Xylene

 Cg-Alkane

 CgH^2 '(5 isomers)

 C^g-Alkane

 C-J^Q-Alkane

 C-J^Q-Alkane

 CIQ-Alkane

 C-^Q-Alkane

 *"10H14 (7 isomers)

 Cyclohexene

 C-j^ -Alkane     :


 INORGANICS

 Ant imony
 Arsenic
 Cadmium
 Chromium
 Copper
Mercury
 Lead
 Zinc
                                                  0.3

                                              1000

                                                30

                                               300

                                               100

                                               100

                                               300

                                               100

                                                30

                                                30

                                                30

                                               300

                                               300

                                                30

                                                30
                                         0.2 - 230
                                         0.2 - 9
                                         1.1 - 97
                                         0.5 - 140
                                         3.6 - 490
                                         0.05-8.2
                                         8-740
                                         37 - 1670
  Source:  data from Brinkman and Kjiuijdenberg,  1982, pp.  97-98
+ Organics determined by mass spectroscopy
                                     225

-------
TABLE' 17.  POLLUTANTS DETERMINED  IN WATER  SAMPLES  FROM THE LEKKERKERK SITE
Pollutant
Benzene head (vapor)
Toluene vapor space
Xylene vapor space
Concentration (mg/L)
Month ( from
1/10
space 10
450
215
Ethylbenzene vapor space 45
Cadmium
Chromium
Mercury
Lead
Copper
Arsenic
1,800
2,000
5
800

Before and
initiation of remedial
1/10 25/9
10
485
1,890
638
3,200
1,600
5
1,800

10
105
30
10
180
200
-
1,200
150
After Cleanup
works) and day
24/9
10
95
126
27
100
0.6
1
660
20
1.1 1
  Source:  data from Brinkman and Kruijdenberg, 1982, p. 97
                                     226

-------
     "Phase 1  —   Division of the area into compartments by means of box dams
                   and dykes;
                   Clearing the trenches filled with refuse and waste and
                   removal of polluted soil around the trench profile;
                   Digging away of the"remaining ground to a depth of about
                   0.700 meters under the mowing field and cultivated areas as
                   well as underneath foundation beams in order  (to attain a
                   satisfactory working height)."
     "Phase 2  —   Filling up the trenches, the,ground under roads and
                   underneath houses with drift sand and the remaining
                   portions with soil;
                   Installing a drainage system in the cleaned up trenches;
                   Removing the box
    "Phase 3  —
                                    screens."
                   Installing public utilities;
                   Laying sewers, pavements, and plantings.
    The remediation activities involved the excavation and removal of 93,800
cubic meters of contaminated soil from the ditches and other dumping areas
(Borst and Ferns, 1982, p. 103).  The area between the ditches was excavated
to a depth of about 0.7 meters to the original level of the surface (Borst and
Ferns, 1982, p. 104).  This soil was determined to be essentially clean and
was temporarily stored as the excavation work proceeded.  Ultimately this soil
was used as fill.  Excavations under some houses were made to a depth of 3
meters.  The houses built on concrete piles were excavated first.
    A field laboratory was set up oil the site to provide quick turn-around
chemical analyses.  The more complicated analyses were performed at offsite
laboratories.                .               •
   . During the excavation phase, some 1,000 tonnes were excavated and removed
from the Lekkerkerk site daily  (Borst and Ferns,  1982, p. 107).  Some 153,000
tonnes of polluted soil, labeled as
ship to the Rijnmond Waste Processir
incinerator in the Botlek region.
                                    special industrial waste, were taken by
                                    g Works (AVR),  a domestic refuse
                                    Since the waste processing capacity at AVR
was only 1500 tonnes per week (Borstj and Ferns, 1982, p. 107), the Lekkerkerk
waste was temporarily stored in a specially designed and dedicated area and
gradually incinerated along with domestic waste in the stack kilns.  The 3-
                                    227

-------
hectare  (7.5-acre) storage area was designed with a chemically resistant,
impermeable flooring and provided for the collection and processing of the
waste leachate.
    Containers that were encountered during the excavations were dealt with
separately from the polluted soil.  Containers with residual chemicals were
emptied  (by pumping) into 60-liter containers for transport.  Containers with
innocuous contents were emptied and cleaned by spraying.  Depending on the
chemicals present and the levels, the contents of the containers were either
shipped and processed with the polluted Lekkerkerk soil at AYR, or marked as
special industrial waste and processed in the AYR chemical furnace.
    A school and a gymnasium were demolished as part of the remediation work.
The school had been built over four filled-in trenches and, due to the size of
the structure and the limited reach of the diggers, excavation was technically
impossible.
    Steps were taken to avoid the transport of polluted water through cleaned
up areas.  Polluted ground water and surface water were treated in a physico-
chemical purification plant to remove both organics and heavy metals prior to
discharge to the River Lek.  The physico-chemical treatment included
sedimentation, oil skimming; flocculation with polymer-aluminum chloride
(complex), flotation, and removal; and filtration through activated charcoal.
About 10 percent of the water from the purification plant was passed through a
trough containing trout.  By monitoring the condition of the fish, the
biological quality of the treated effluent could be assured.
    Four water storage basins with a combined capacity of 4,000 cubic meters
were constructed to handle untreated water, rejected purified water, sludge,
and water released during process shut-downs.  These basins were lined with
high density polyethylene  (HDPE) to prevent seepage of pollutants into the
ground.
    The total cost of the remediation work at Lekkerkerk amounted to about
f!50 million Dutch guilders  ($65 million U.S.).  If Lekkerkerk were discovered
today, the remedial action for the site would likely be very different as the
cost of such a program cannot be justified (von Lidth de Jeude, 1982;
Hoogendoorne, 1984, p. 569).
                                     228

-------
Site Reuse
intended to make the homes safe for
    No change in land use was intended.  Rather, the site remediation was
                                    the inhabitants.  The appearance of the
                                           Both the school and the gymnasium
site in 1985 is completely normal with no evidence of the drastic cleanup
measures that had been carried out there.
have now been rebuilt.

Criteria for Cleanup

    One of the basic requirements for the cleanup of Lekkerkerk was that no
polluting materials would be allowed to remain in the area  (Borst and Ferris,
1982, p. 102).  An experienced environmentalist  (affiliated with the
Adviesbureau Arnhem) was responsible for determining what portion of the soil
                                    to ensure that excavations did not go
                                     This was done on the basis of visual and
                                    confirmed by chemical analyses (Brinkmann
had to be excavated and removed and
beyond what was strictly necessary.
sensory evaluation and subsequently
and Kruijdenberg, 1982, p. 88).
    The Inspection Institute for Waterworks Installations was involved in the
site activities.  The contribution of this Institute was the determination of
extractable organically bound chlorine in clean soil in order to confirm
whether excavations had gone sufficiently far (Brinkmann and Kruijdenberg,
1982, p. 87).  Treated water released from the purification plant was required
to meet the conditions set forth in
                                    the site permit issued under the Law
governing the Pollution of Surface Water (WVO).
    The guidelines for site assessment (Table 15) were not applied at
Lekkerkerk since they were not yet developed.
CASE STUDY:  TILBURG GAS WORKS
    The cleanup of the Tilburg Gas
remediation effort to protect human
contaminated land into beneficial
                                   Works site is one example of a major
                                    health and the environment and to bring
                                          This site is scheduled to be
                                  reuse.
                                     229

-------
redeveloped as multi-family housing.  The site investigation and remediation
efforts were subsidized by the Central Government, with the Municipality of
Tilburg funding 10 percent.

Site History

    The Tilburg Gas Works produced gas from coal for more than 100 years on a
5.5 hectare (13 acre) site that is now in central Tilburg, a major industrial
city in the Dutch Province of North-Brabant.  In addition to coal gas, the
plant produced coke as well as byproduct tars, benzene, toluene, naphthalene,
and ammonia.  Watergas was produced from the coke.  During the many years of
the gas works operation, there were spills and leaks from the various
processing equipment and storage vessels, and production wastes were often
dumped at the site or used for leveling the surface.  These wastes included
spent iron sand used for removing sulfur and cyanide compounds from the
product gas.  Tars from onsite pits and process water seeped through the
underlying sandy soil to pollute groundwater.  When the gas works was closed
in 1960, the above-ground structures were demolished, and the highly
contaminated soil was uncovered.

Nature and Extent of the Contamination

    The extent of the contamination was not fully recognized, however, until
site investigations was undertaken in 1982 when the City of Tilburg engaged
the consulting firm Ingenieursbureau "Oranjewould" b.v. to assess the kind and
degree of the pollution in the soil and in the ground water at the site
(Kidding, 1985; de Vries, 1985).  The site, history was investigated, and
available maps were studied to identify areas of the site where contamination
was likely to be most concentrated.  This information was used to guide
further site characterization.  A 10 x 10 meter grid was laid out and samples
were taken both at the surface and at depth.  In the initial site
investigation a total of 126 soil borings were made to a depth of 3 meters.
                                     230

-------
and 236  soil  samples were  taken.  Ths water table at the site  is normally
found at about  2 meters below the surface.  Ground water samples were taken
from observation wells  (4-meter depth).
    Chemical analyses were performed
 based on historical  information pertinent
to each sampling  location and on colsr, texture, and odor of samples.  The
analyses revealed very heavy local pollution of soils and ground water.
Contaminants of concern  included volktile aromatics, PNA's, and cyanides.  The
cyanides, at concentrations up to 77
iron sand waste.  Tar and oil produc
meters.  The pH of water at the site
)0  ppm, were  associated with the  buried
;s  polluted large areas to  a depth of  4
measured  2.5 due to  the presence of
hydrogen sulfide.  Coal and sinters covered several acres of the site.
    When the site investigation began, the mobility of the tar and tar com-
ponents at the site was underestimated.  The extent of withdrawal of ground
water from the vicinity was found to
revealed high levels of aromatics in
be  far more extensive than was  first
thought,  (large wells for cooling wa;er for a nearby power plant and for dairy
industry) and the ground water extractions apparently enhanced the downward
migration of the site contaminants  (Jlidding, 1985).  Expanded investigations
soils taken six to nine, meters below the
surface.  High concentrations of benzene and mineral oil were found in ground
water from 20 meters below the surface.  Some odors  (e.g. hydrogen sulfide,,
naphthalene) were detectable.

Remediation Activities

    In 1984, the Tilburg Department of Public Works contracted for the remedi-
ation work that was to be carried out during the winter period of 1984-1985
and in October and November of 1985 (Heida, 1985).  The decision was made to
perform the, excavations during the winter period in order to minimize odors
and volatile emissions from the site   This reduced the hazard to the site
workers as well as exposure to area residents.  G. van Hees and Zonen, B.V.,,  a
Tilburg contractor experienced in site remediation work, submitted the lowest F
                                     231

-------
IDODD!
                                         w
                                         a
                                         o
                                         •H
                                         4.)


                                         5
                                         M-4
                                         O

                                         4J

                                         s
                                         I
                                         c/l
                                         I!
                                         Cn
                                         M

                                         I!
                                         rH

                                         EH
                                        in
                                        CM
3
Dl
-H
    in
    oo
                                             Oi
                                             a
                                             •H
                                             •a
                                             Tl
                                             0)
                                             u
                                             o
     232

-------
 bid and was awarded the contract foi  the gas works project.   The remediation
 work was overseen by the Ingenieursbureau "Oranjewould".   The surface work at
 the site was initiated at the end ofi  August.
     The site was divided into five areas (shown in Figure 25)  based on pre-
 excavation conditions.  Most buildirjgs on the site had already been demolished
 except for paved floors and foundations.  Section I was  contaminated mainly
 from iron sand,  while Sections II,  311,  and IV were mainly polluted with tar
 and oil products. Section V was covered with coal and sinters.  The first
 phase of the remediation work addres
sed Sections I, II, III, and V.
     In determining the extent of excavation necessary to prepare the site for
 use as housing,  it was concluded that future inhabitants of the site should
 not be confronted with any perceptible pollution from the former gas works
 (guidelines from the Ministry suggested that contamination should be cleaned
 up to background levels).   Thus all
sensory detectable pollution to a depth of
 2  meters  was  removed.   Excavations were also carried out  to lower depths to
 reduce contaminant concentrations and to minimize further contamination of the
 aquifer.   Contaminants  below 6 meters were  to be  controlled through ground
 water withdrawal.   The extent of the
 25.
 to  lower the  water table from around
 site excavations is indicated in Figure
     Because of the  depth of the  excavations  in  several  areas  it  was  necessary
 2.5 meters to about 5 meters below ground
.level.   This was  accomplished by means  of  11  deep wells  equipped with
 underwater  pumps.   During the excavations  up  to  six wells were  operated,
 withdrawing ground water at  a rate  of 150  to  300 'cubic meters per  hour.   The
 wells were  located in  "clean"  areas
 minimize further  downward migration
of the excavation site in an effort to
°
f pollutants in the ground water.  The
water withdrawn  from the  deep wells was  discharged  to  the  sewer  system
following aeration  to remove volatiles.
    During  the winter 1984-1985,  a tDtal of  28,186  cubic meters  of  chemically
polluted soil were  excavated and  transported to a site at  Moerdijk,  some  50
kilometers  from  Tilburg,  for temporary storage and  thermal treatment.  This
material  included 2,650  cubic meters
 of polluted soil from deeper than 4
                                     233

-------
meters.  In addition, more than 27,000 cubic meters of polluted soil and 2,846
cubic meters of demolition debris were removed to a dumping ground at Tilburg.
Trucks and trailers were used to transport the polluted soils and demolition
debris to their ultimate destination.
    A soil scientist stationed near the excavation pit on a daily basis was
responsible for deciding whether soils were to be transported to the treatment
facility or to the Tilburg dump. These decisions were made on the basis of
visual observations and sampling.
    The polluted soil removed from the site was replaced with clean sand.  A
total of 55,000 cubic meters of sand were trucked in, and the site was
regraded.  This operation was ongoing in March 1985 when the Authors visited
the site.  Pumping of contaminated ground water also continued.  The hauling
away of the excavated soil and the clean sand fill involved 8,000 truck loads
of material.  All was accomplished without incident.
    The second phase of the cleanup  (addressing Section IV) was scheduled to
begin in the fall of 1985.  Work in this section was delayed because of the
need to relocate underground gas mains that intersect the area.
    During the soil excavations, a labor hygienist measured the level of
hydrocarbons in vapors released from the excavation areas.  If hydrocarbon
levels exceeded 10 ppm, benzene was analyzed to ensure that allowable
occupational hygiene levels in air were not exceeded.  Independent breathing
devices were used if excessive benzene levels were detected.  In fact, this
occurred only in a few instances.  Hydrogen cyanide was also monitored, but
was never detected, possibly due to the very cold temperatures.  All workers
were prohibited from eating, drinking, or smoking on the site, and special
protective clothing was required.
    A physician responsible for health aspects management of public works was
involved with worker health during the site cleanup.  The particular concerns
were toxicity hazards from exposure to polycyclic organics, benzene and other
volatile aromatic hydrocarbons, and cyanide.  Physical examinations pf almost
70 workers were performed including disease and exposure history, skin, blood,
and liver profiles.  As a result of these examinations, two workers were
                                     234

-------
 restricted from working at the more highly contaminated areas.   During the
 course of the excavation work,  blood cyanide levels  were monitored in workers
 with potential exposures.  Careful  rpcords were maintained of environmental
 conditions and of worker function.

 Site Reuse

     Future use of the  site will be  mainly  residential.   Housing  for the
 elderly (132  apartments)  will  be developed on the north east  area  as well  as
 about 60  private homes.   About  100  private homes are planned  for the west
 area.   Private homes and a parking  a::ea will be constructed on Area I.  . The
 south east area will be  a parking area and a green space.

 Criteria  for  Cleanup

     The National guidelines for soils were used to determine  the extent of the
 excavations required to  reach uncontiiminated soils.
     It  was determined  that onsite pu:rification  of ground water to  achieve  the
 National  guidelines was  prohibitively expensive.  The water was  therefore  dis-
 charged to the sewer system to  be cleaned  up by the  municipal treatment plant.

 CASE  STUDY:   DELFSHAVEN,  ROTTERDAM  HARBOUR,  ROTTERDAM
    Rotterdam is a densely populated
industrial development.  The natural
region and has a long history of
harbor at Rotterdam has been used for
centuries, and the City became a major port when the "New Waterway,"
consisting of a canal, river, and harbor system, was constructed between 1863
and 1872.  Today the Port of Rotterdam is the largest bulk cargo port in the
world and'also one of the world's lai
moved some 250 million tons of goods
Department, Rotterdam, 1983, p. 2).
•gest container ports.  In 1982, sea-ships
through Rotterdam  (Public Works
The rivers Nieuwe Maas and Oude Maas,
                                     235

-------
which are branches of the Rhine and the Meuse Rivers, respectively, carry some
1,500 cubic meters of water per second through Rotterdam.  This water deposits
approximately two million tons of silt, mainly in the eastern harbor area.  In
addition, sand and silt are carried inward by the sea; deposition of the sea
silt is mainly in the western harbors.
    The Port of Rotterdam is maintained by dredging approximately 20 million
cubic meters of silt and sand annually from the floor of the harbor and river
areas.  As ships using the port have increased in size over the past century,
the waterways have been made deeper and wider to accommodate them.  Some of
the older harbor areas, however, can no longer be used by the larger ships,
and an extensive effort is underway to reclaim these areas for housing.  The
harbor areas are known to be contaminated, and questions regarding safety and
the cost of redevelopment have arisen in connection with the redevelopment
efforts.

Land Use History and Redevelopment Objectives

    The Delfshaven District of Rotterdam is located in the western harbour
area.  The harbour and industrial sites within this District have been used
for many centuries, but no longer meet present day requirements for storage
and shipping activities (Veltman, 1984, p. 2).  As a result, industrial
premises are being demolished and parts of the harbour are being filled in to
to meet the need for new land for housing.  Industries formerly located in the
Delfshaven District include galvanizing, petrol, pesticide manufacturing, and
shipbuilding.

Nature and Extent of the Contamination

    The silt in the eastern harbor area that is being filled is contaminated
with oil and other substances carried by the river sediments and is about 1
meter (3.3 feet) thick (Veltman, 1984).  Cadmium is reported to be present in
                                     236

-------
 polluted silt in the eastern area of
 rag per kilogram dry material (Public
 The composition of harbor silt  given
 Department,  Rotterdam (1983,  p.  5):
          water
          pesticides
          dry material
          heavy metals
          oil
The extent of  the  contamination area  is  shown  in  Figure  26.
    The water above  the polluted  silt
complications  if  the  silt  is dredged,
:he harbor at  a level  of approximately 18
forks  Department,  Rotterdam,  1983,  p.  7) .
Delow  is  reported  by the Public Works

  82.8 percent
   0.0006 percent
   7.6 percent
   0.01 percent
   0.2 percent.
 is approximately  4 meters  (13 meters)
deep.  The presence of  the oil and other pollutants  in the harbor  silt  causes
since during dredging, the silt  (along
with pollutants present)  is  stirred up and dispersed, causing pollution of  the
surface water.  Disposal  of  the contaminated dredged silt also presents a
problem, since it cannot  be  discharged at the disposal sites normally used  for
dredge spoils  (Veltman, 1984, p. 3).
    The subsoil of the area  to be filled is made up of peat and clay, up to 14
meters thick  (46 feet) which tends to
subside under load.  This peat and clay
is underlain by water-bearing sand layers.  The underlying grouhdwater is
brackish and therefore unusable as drinking water.
Remediation Activities
    Prior to filling the harbour area,
dredging in order to prevent slip plar
 it is customary to remove the silt by
es (sliding surfaces) in the subsoil.  A
second reason for removing the weak silt layer is that it has a tendency
toward irregular settlement and is thei
where buildings are planned.  However,
refore undesirable as a subsurface layer
 recognizing the complications involved
with dredging the polluted silt, another engineering approach was developed
that would allow areas to be filled with the silt retained in the harbor basin
and also shield the environment from the pollutants present in the silt.
                                     237

-------
238

-------
     The method of filling is applied
 doors in the floor for releasing the
 sand is gradually built up in 20 cen
 feet).  The geotextile filter serves
 layers and also prevents mixing of t!
     Vertical plastic drains are then
 the clay/peat layer to about 1 meter
 to an area measuring 30 by 50 meters.  A
 geotextile filter is first placed over the silt layer to stabilize the layer
 to reduce the risk of heave.  The filter fabric is cut to size and then sunken
 as one unit.  Sand is then added evenly across the geotextile filter.  This is
 accomplished using a specially designed pontoon type boat with independent
 sand uniformly over a sizable area.  The
timeter lifts to a depth of 2 meters (6.5
 to distribute the weight of the sand
 e polluted silt with the clean sand.
 installed through the sand and the
 geotextile filter cloth and extending beneath the harbor silt and deep into
 (3.3  feet)  above  the  aquifer.   The
 geotextile filter is permeable to wa ;er,  allowing water from the subsoil
 (which is under excess pressure)  to penetrate upward.   The vertical drains
 allow dewatering of the underlying c..ay/peat layer with the water being
 carried away through the sand layer.
     The sand filling is continued until the  surface level  of the water is
 reached.   A protective layer of  clay
 sand.  This clay layer must  be added
is then placed and compressed over the
when the sand level is above the water or
 the  clay will  simply  disperse.   FinaMy, a new  sand  layer  is added  over  the
 clay to prepare  for a new building  site'.  The clay layer is sandwiched
 approximately  halfway between the top and bottom of  the covering sand layer.
 The  covering is  designed  to prevent direct contact with the contaminated silt.
     The infilling results in a considerable top load on the compressible clay/
 peat subsurface  and on the silt  layei.  As a consequence of this load, water
 will be forced out of these layers, dither to the underlying aquifer or  to the
 sand layer.  This water will not seed to the surface, however, because of the
 clay layer.  Rather,  the  water will njove laterally through the sand layers and
 eventually into  the open  harbor where, tidal flow will effect further dilution.
    Several processes will affect the
present in the water seeping from the
hydrodynamic dispersion, retardation
 movement and concentration 'of pollutants
 polluted subsoils.   These include
(adsorption),  and degradation.  The
                                     39

-------
concentration of the organic pollutants is expected to decrease exponentially
with time as a result of microbial degradation.  The effect of the polluted
ground water on the environs of the harbor is expected to be minimal because
of the gradual release.
    The additional cost of the fill method described above is about fSO.OOO
Dutch guilders  (about $22,000 U.S.) higher than the cost of traditional
dredging and filling at the site.  This comparison does not include costs of
treating and disposing of the polluted dredged material.
    Funding for the harbor infill  is provided by the Municipality of
Rotterdam.  Central Government assistance was not sought for this project
because; 1) The city wished to expedite the work without waiting for a lengthy
review and selection process by the Central Government; and 2) the  intended
approach for filling the harbor area, although believed to be environmentally
sound, does not meet the Central Government's guidelines.  Even though the
approach is designed to be protective of human health, it does not  constitute
complete removal  or isolation of the polluted material with no release into
the  environment.

Site Reuse

     The purpose of the harbor  infill  is  to provide  additional  land for
buildings  for  new housing.   The Delfshaven District in  the  older  part of the
 city of Rotterdam is  considered to be very desirable for  expanded residential
 development.

 Criteria for Cleanup

     One objective of the harbor infill project was elimination of direct
 health hazards.  The main concern addressed pollutants present in the harbor
 silt that might be brought to the surface.  Protection of ground water was not
 a major concern since the water is brackish and therefore unusable for
 drinking supplies.
     The National guidelines for soil and water were not applied in designing
 this remedial action.                   •
                                      240

-------
 CASE STUDY: MERWEDEPOLDER, DORDRECHT
                              Merwedepolder
                                     were
                                 contamination
                                   remedial
      housing site is located in
    developed on this site without
         from chemical waste which was
      actions at the site have been
                                     owners.
    The 25-hectare  (62 acre)
Dordrecht in South Holland.  Houses
adequate consideration for soil
previously dumped there.  Drastic
necessary to satisfy Merewedepolder

Site History
     The site was used as a chemical waste dump prior to 1970.  The landfill
 was operated by the town of Dordrecht.   After the landfill was closed^  the
 town began to develop the site for housing.   There was no real closure of the
 landfill (as is practiced today)  although some effort was made to isolate the
 wastes by capping the deposits with clay.
     Some 800 houses were built at Merwedepolder between 1973  and 1976.   These
 homes are typically three story,  threte-bedroom,  single family residences.
 Some are constructed as row houses,  while others are free standing.   A large
 structure to provide housing for  the slderly was also constructed on the site.
 The  site  is  owned by the town of Dord
 have been demolished,  and many of the
 remaining homeowners and tenants have
recht.   Some houses  at Merewedepolder
 remaining houses  are vacant.   The
 played an active  role in deciding
whether proposed solutions  to  the  contamination problem are acceptable.
Nature and Extent of  the Contaminatiom
    The presence of contamination at the site first became apparent  in 1982
when foundations of the homes began to crack from differential settlement.
•This settlement occurred due to unconsolidated material beneath the  homes.
The problem was not immediately attributed to unusual ground conditions.
since, in this part of Holland, there
because of the soft underlying strata
this area is typically about 60 centin
necessitates reconstruction of buried
is continuous settlement of the land
and the high water table.  Settlement in
teters in 10 years and normally
gas and water pipes every 5 to 10 years.

-------
    Workers repairing infrastructure at the site suffered some acute affects
as a result of exposure to volatile chemicals buried in the ground beneath the
houses.  Testing revealed high levels of volatile organics in indoor spaces of
some of the homes.  There was some panic among the residents at the site when
the chemical contamination was discovered.  An investigation followed, arid
chemical industry wastes including chemical drums were found.
    A historical investigation showed that chemical wastes had been deposited
at Merwedepolder by Du Pont and by other chemical companies in Rotterdam.
People who had worked at the landfill were interviewed regarding what
materials had been placed at the site and in what areas.  It was learned that
some specific areas of the dump were used more extensively for the problematic
wastes.

Remediation Activities

    It was determined that the cost of excavation and removal of all  the con-
taminated material would cost on the order of f856 million Dutch guilders
 (about $300 million U.S. based on  1983 exchange rates).  This option  was
judged to be too costly to consider further.  Therefore, the  initial  plan  for
remediation was to isolate all the contaminated material on site.  However,
the residents of Merwedepolder were unwilling to accept this  approach because
of concerns regarding the potential health effects arising from the buried
contamination.  There was also considerable  concern over property values.   As
a result, a more comprehensive remediation plan was devised.
    For purposes of the remedial action,  the site was divided into  four areas
as shown in Figure 27.  Most of the contamination was confined to Areas 1  and
 3.  The southernmost area. Area 1,  is  bounded on the south by a waterway;  in
 1982,  this area contained  106 private  homes  as well as  the housing  for  the
 elderly  (bejaardencentrum).  After the remediation work began, Area 4 also was
 contaminated when  excavated  soil  from  Area  1 was deposited there.
                                      242

-------
                   Situatie  afgeschermce  gebieden
                   __^  stalen damwani
                   -——  hydrologische a'scherming
Figure 27.   Schematic of Merwedepolder showing Areas 1 through 4, designated
             for purposes of the remedial  action.

                  (Source:   OnderbouwLng en Uitwerking,  1985)

                                     243

-------
    A political decision was made to remove all 106 homes (except the
bejaardencentrum) located in Area 1.  All of these homes were purchased by the
town from the individual owners, and the homes were removed or demolished in
1983.  Area 1 was' isolated from the other areas through a drainage system and
a vertical barrier 7 meters (23 feet) deep, consisting of a bentonite slurry
trench wall and a steel wall.  The top meter of soil was excavated arid removed
and clean soil was brought in to fill the area back to the original level.
    As a result of public fear regarding the contamination, real estate values
at Merwedepolder fell by 50 percent.  In spite of the fact that there was no
indication of increased risk from the contamination, the government also
agreed to buy all owner occupied houses in Areas 2 and 3 at their fair market
value.  This offer did not extend, however, to owners of houses that had been
purchased as rental property for investment purposes.  Several owners
continued to insist on total removal of the contaminants on the site.
    The plan for the site remediation'was  finally accepted in early 1985.
Contracts were scheduled to be  let  in 1985 to perform the site work.  The
problems in designing the site  cleanup were more political than technical, as
all the various owners had to be satisfied with the solution.
    Although the houses in Area 3 were bought out by the government, they were
not removed.  All drainage from Area 3 was controlled in order to  isolate the
area.  Groundwater was pumped to the surface and treated prior to  discharge.
    One concern  is  for protection of the water collection basin  located near
the  site,  just beyond a narrow  basin which lies adjacent to  the  site.   A sandy
layer underlies  the buried waste.   There  is concern that polluted  groundwater
will move  through this  layer, carrying  the leached pollutants off-site.   Three
pumping wells were  installed.   These wells pumped  30  cubic meters  per  hour  in
order  to create  an  artificial gradient  in the  underlying aquifer to prevent
migration  of pollutants off-site.
     Funding for  the site  remediation was  provided  by  the Central Government
 (90  percent) and by the  local municipality (10 percent).
                                      244

-------
Site Reuse
    In 1985, the remaining houses at
Merwedepolder were located,in Areas 2 and
3, and most had been purchased by the government.  Although many of the houses
were empty, some were rented at about 10 to 15 percent below the market value.
Criteria for Cleanup
    The cleanup scheme finally adopted
decisions rather than on health-basec
  was based largely on political
 criteria.
                                    245

-------
                                 REFERENCES
Borst, R. J., and E. F. Ferns, 1982.  "Processing of Waste Materials."  Ins
Operation Lekkerkerk West, Hoomans, J. P. and J. W. Stellingwerff, Editors,
pp. 102-118.  From PT/Civiele Techniek, 1982.

Brinkmann, F. J. J., and H. J. M. Kruijdenberg, 1982.  "Chemical Supervision."
In:  Operation Lekkerkerk West, Hoomans, J. P. and J. W. Stellingwerff,
Editors, pp. 85-101.  From PT/Civiele Techniek, 1982.

de Fries, F. H., 1985.  Purging the Site of the Gasworks in Tilburg."
Presented March 21, 1985.

De Walle, F. B., 1987.  "Soil Standards for Hazardous Waste Disposal and
Cleanup in the Netherlands.".  In:  Proceedings, The Second International
Conference on New Frontiers for Hazardous Waste Management.  September 27-30,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 461-468.

Dresden, M. J., 1984.  Soil Contamination  (Interim Measures) Act*

EC, 1980.  ''Water Quality Standards for Drinking Water, EC Directive."
European Community, EC Publications Journal, L229-11, 1980.

Groundwater Newsletter, 1986.  Groundwater News, Netherlands.  Published by
Water Information Center, Inc.  Geraghty and Miller, Inc., Groundwater
Consultants.  February 28, 1986.

Heida, S. A., Ing., 1985.  "Reconstruction Site of Gasworks at Tilburg."
Prepared by Ingenieursbureau  "Oranjewould" B.V., Heerenveen, The Netherlands,
for presentation March 21, 1985.

Kidding, H., 1985.  "Investigation  of  Soil and Groundwater Contamination, at the
Site of the Former Gas-Works  at Tilburg" Prepared by Ingenieursbureau
"Oranjewould" B.V., Heerenveen, The Netherlands, for presentation March 21,
1985.

Hoogendoorn, D., 1984.   "Review of the  Development of Remedial Action
Techniques for  Soil Contamination  in  the Netherlands."  In: Proceedings The
5th National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste  Sites.
November 7-9, Washington, D.  C. pp 569-575.

Hoomans, J. P.  and J. W.  Stellingwerff,  1982.   Operation Lekkerkerk West.
Reprint  from Pt/Civiele Techniek,  1982, No.  1,  3 -44.

Lewis, W. K., W. M. Thomas, and R. J. C. B.  Barren,  1987.   "Contamination  of
Groundwater Resources and Impact on Potable  Supplies."  Bostock Hill & Rigby
Limited, Southhampton, England.  April  1987.
                                     246

-------
 bodensanesing"  (Guidelines for Soil
 Ministry of Housing,  Physical Planning,  and the Environment,  1983a.  "Leidraad
                Clean Up: Implementation of  the  Soil
 Cleanup (Interim)  Act:  Assessing the Severity of a Case of Soil Contamination
 in The Netherlands),  April 1983,  The Hague.

 Ministry of Housing,  Physical Planning,  and  the Environment,  1983b.  Handbook
 of Soil Reconstruction  Techniques.   Staatsuitgeverij,  The Hague. July 1983.

 Ministry of Housing,  Physical Planning,  and  the Environment,  1984a.  Soil
 Clean-Up (Interim)  Act  of 29  December 1982.   Central  Department for
 Information and International Relations,  April 1984,  VROM 8459419-84,  4027191,
 10 pp.

 Ministry of Housing,  Physical Planning,  and  the Environment,  1984b.  Interim
 Indicative  Multi-Year Programme,  Soil Protection 1984  - 1988.   Central
 Department  for  Information and International Relations,  August 1984,  VROM
 8459119-84,  4026191,  7  pp.  Municipal Port Management,  Port Promotion Council,
 1984.   Port of  Rotterdam,  Map.
Onderbouwing en Uitwerking,
DOK:  1668E/1623E.  O.N.:   84/3583,
        Saneringsplan
                                           Merwedepolder, Dordrecht,  1985.
                                    January 1985.
Public Works Department Rotterdam,  1983.
and Public Relations in cooperation
Commercial Affairs, Rotterdam,
                      Rotterdam Harbour Silt.  Information
                with Port of Rotterdam External and
                     1983, 19 pp.
                               September

Stellingwerff, J. W., 1982.  "Preparation and Execution."  In:  Operation
Lekkerkerk West, Hoomans, J. P., and' J. W. Stellingwerff, Editors, pp. 14-41.
From PT/Civiele Techniek, 1982.
van Lidth de Jeude, J. W., 19.82.
Remedial Actions."  Ministry of Publlic
Leidschendam, February 1982.
               Hazardous Waste Sites in The Netherlands:
                   Health and Environmental Protection,
Veltman, M., 1984.
Contaminated Silt."
August 1984.
"The Filling In
 Municipality of
                                     f Harbour Basins Which Contain
                                     Rotterdam, Public Works Department,
                                    247

-------
                                   SECTION 7
                         FEDERAL  REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
INTRODUCTION

     The Federal  Republic of Germany  (FRG)  located in northwest central Europe
is commonly referred to as West Germany.  The  FRG occupies an area of 248,882
square kilometers (96,094 square miles),  somewhat smaller than the state of
Oregon in the  U.S.   The population of the FRG  is  over 61 million.  Almost half
the population lives in ten metropolitan  regions.  The Rhine-Ruhr area
includes the greatest aggregate of industry.
     The FRG comprises ten states  (Lander)  plus the territory of West Berlin.
The Lander enjoy considerable political autonomy, each having its own
equivalent of  a prime minister, parliament,  and provincial ministries,.
     The FRG shares borders with nine other European countries-- France,
Denmark, The Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Austria,
Czechoslovakia, and East Germany.  The  FRG  is  shown in Figure 28.
     The unit  of currency in FRG is  the Deutsche Mark  (DM).

THE FEDERAL  PROGRAM
      The Federal Waste Disposal  Act for general environmental protection in
 the  FRG was issued in 1972.   Under this law,  waste disposal  facilities are
 subject to prior licensing.   The basic principle of the Waste Disposal Act is
 that wastes have to be disposed  of in a way that avoids environmental damage.
 Thus any possible damages  have to be assessed and evaluated, and appr'opricite
 counter measures planned as  conditions in the license.  The  provision
 requiring the plan establishment procedure applies to new  facilities and also
 to those facilities already  in operation before the Waste  Disposal Act came
 into force (Szelinski, 1983).
 Authors' Note:  We are very grateful to Mr. Klaus Stief, Umweltbundesampt,  Berlin, who arranged
 most of our itinerary during our visit to the Federal Republic of Germany.  We met with Mr. Stief
 in November 1984,  in the U.S.,  to discuss the purpose of our information gathering and to learn
 of sites in the FRG relevant to our research.  Prior to our arrival in Europe, Mr. Stief

                                       248

-------
        O  ««tal«IC«ptol

      Bom*   CNy :

            MHiulaulBcumtey

            AdmMiMlw DWrtotaoumhiy

     Bay em
                                                   Schieawig
                                                    Holstein
           NETHERLANDS
                          Nordrhein-Westfalen
                         (North Rhine-Westphalia)
                                  WEST
                                 GERMANY
                                                                                       CZECHOSLOVAKIA
                          Rhineland-Pfalz
                        (Rhineland-Palatinate)
                                      Baden-Wurttemberg
Figure  28.   Map of the  Federal Republic  of  Germany.
                                               249

-------
     The Federal  Environmental Agency for the FRG is the Umweltbundesampt,
headquartered in  Berlin.   The Umweltbundesampt is responsible for establishing
basic environmental policies for the republic, although the  individual Lander
implement  their own programs.  The Umweltbundesampt sponsors research and
development  efforts relating to remedial action on contaminated land.  Since
about 75 percent  of the drinking water in the FRG comes from groundwa'ter, one
area of foremost  concern at the Federal level is protection  of groundwater.
There are  federal regulations for. potable water.
      In dealing  with  contaminated land in the FRG,  the Umweltbundesampt
recognizes two types of contaminated sites: abandoned  waste  disposal sites and
contaminated industrial estates.  Sites that definitely or most probably
produce negative  environmental impacts are  termed  "problem"  sites.  The German
word  "Altlasten"  (meaning old burdens) is used to refer to environmentally
hazardous  old waste deposits or abandoned waste disposal  "problem" sites.  The
diagram in Figure 29  (Stief and Franzius, 1983) indicates the various   •
distinctions made in discussing contaminated  sites  and the actions appropriate
to  each type of site.
      In 1983,  the  number of abandoned waste disposal  "problem" sites in the
FRG was estimated at less than 1,000  (Stief and Franzius,  1983).
      "Investigations into,  and,  if necessary, remedial action on abandoned
waste disposal sites are particularly  necessary  if:                   ;
           —  the  type of use of a landscaped disposal site or the area
                of a closed waste disposal site is to be changed,
           —  houses  are to be built on it, or it is  to be  'used for a
                road or long-distance line,
            —  there are indications that unrecorded hazardous waste has
                been dumped on them,
            —  environment-related changes  are determined  by official
                checks,
            —  other unexpected negative impacts  occur.
                Franzius, 1983)
(Stief and
 Authors' Note (Continued):  distributed copies of our draft report on reclamation and
 redevelopment in the U.S. to the various offices we were to visit.  As a result of Mr. Stief's
 assistance, our time in the FRG was carefully planned to enable us to meet and discuss issues
 with many different individuals.  All of the visits and interviews took place in March 1985.
                                       250

-------
               Abandoned Waste
               Disposal Sites
                     Contaminated
                      Industrial
                       Estates
                                  CONTAMINATED SITES
                                   Identification
                                   Investigation
                                   Risic Assessment
      Non-Problem
    Abandoned Waste
     Disposal Sites
Abandoned
Waste Disposal
" Problemr
Sites

Contaminated
Industrial
"Problem"
Estates
                             Contaminated "
         Problem" Sites
                                   Non-Problem
                                  Contaminated
                                    Industrial
                                      Estate
                                  CONTAMINATED SITES
                                    Remedial Actions
Monit
;oring




Controlled
Non- Problem
Abandoned
Waste
Disposal Sites
Controlled
Abandoned
Waste Disposal
. "Problem"
Sites
CONTROLLED ABANDONED WASTE
DISPOSAL SITES
Monit<
aring
Monil
coring







Controlled
' Contaminated
Industrial
"Problem"
Estates


Controlled
Non-Problem
Contaminated
Industrial
Estate
CONTROLLED CONTAMINATED
INDUSTRIAL ESTATES

•CONTROLLED CONTAMINATED SITES
Figure  29.  Diagram to define

                              (Source
                            In case ofi change of use  of  land or
                            newly identified environmental
                                  impacts,  again
                                  identification
                                  investigation
                                  risM assessment
abandoned
      waste  disposal  sites.

   Stief,  1984)

251

-------
In any of the above cases, it is recommended that the suitability of the

former waste disposal site for the intended purpose be checked and a risk

assessment carried out.
      Further recommendations by Stief and Franzius  (1983, pp.  15-17); include

the following:

      "Authorities which are responsible for approving new uses at former
      waste disposal sites ... should know where these sites  are,  who is
      responsible for carrying out the risk assessment in conjunction with the
      new intended use,  and where information can be obtained for these
      sites."

      "The new use of an abandoned waste disposal site must not cause lasting
      worsening of the environmental nuisance caused by the site.   Remedial
      measures already taken must not be nullified.   If necessary,  the new
      user must pay for measures to be taken to restore conditions to a
      comparable level."

      "Remedial action can only be seen as effective if a) environmental
      impacts are tangibly reduced and b)  effectiveness remains long-term."

      "The success of remedial action taken on each abandoned waste disposal
      site must - if the waste has not been excavated - be monitored.
      Monitoring will be centered on the groundwater quality.  Local
      regulations for drinking water can be used as standard  values for
      assessing groundwater analyses.  It is, however, more realistic to take
      the quality of the groundwater upstream from the waste  disposal site as
      the standard value, whereby higher values must be accepted."

      "The monitoring costs must be included in the costs for carrying out the
      remedial action, and it must be ensured that monitoring is carried out.
      Remedial action includes providing the necessary suitable design
      measures and the measuring equipment required for monitoring."
THE CITY-STATE OF HAMBURG


    The northern city-state  of Hamburg,  situated on the River Elbe Hamburg  is

a major center of shipping,  trade, maritime  industries, and manufacturing.

With a population of almost  1.8 million  people, attention to planning and

environmental issues is  essential  to  this metropolitan center.  Hamburg

enacted its waste disposal law in  1971.
                                     252

-------
program to address problems at sites
     In 1981, the Hamburg  City Council approved a special remedial  action
 where hazardous materials had been
produced,  treated, sold,  stored or deposited  in  the past.  One objective for
the  early phase of the program is the development  of a prioritized  listing of
sites  where investigation and remedial action may  be needed  (Shuldt,  1984).
The  district authorities  are responsible for  providing site information (on
standard forms) for all suspicious sites.  The level of detail provided, varies
for  different sites depending on the
the  sites are depicted on  six maps which are made  available to local
authorities involved in buying and s
activities, or urban planning.  Owne
 extent of available  information.  All of
ailing properties, permitting building
rs of suspicious properties are also
informed if a property is  included in the registry.   A systematic approach has
been adopted (tentatively)  to establish priority  sites on the basis of  the
types of materials present,  possibilities for their  release, and sensitive
targets  in the vicinity  (Shuldt,  1984).
    A survey of Hamburg  indicates that there are  some 2400 sites with
potential contamination.   There are 120  areas in  Hamburg that have received
contaminated wastes and that  have to
1985, 32  sites were cleaned up;  some
 be cleaned up.   Between 1976 and January
 of these sites are now being reused.
Costs  for  the cleanups ranged  from about 2,000 to 26,000,000 DM (about  $8.2
million U.S.).  The largest removal involved 72,000  cubic meters of waste
polluted with cyanide from an  old gas works site.  The  gas works company paid
for this  excavation and removal.   In
can be established, the polluter  can
    Among the 120 known contaminated
Authors' Note:   In Hamburg, we visited several
contaminated land assessment and remediation.
cases where the source of  the pollution
be  made to pay the cleanup costs.
sites that need to be addressed,  there
are 36 high priority sites in Hamburg.   These sites have been categorized as
follows:
 city departments engaged in some aspect of
 Our hosts included Mr. Hern Bouchon, Chief, Amt
fur Umweltshutz  (Department of Environmental Protection);  Dr.  Friege, Anstalt fur Hygiene; Ms.
Jane Sorensen, Amt fur Landschaftsplanung (Department of Landscape Planning);  and Mr. Klaus Wolf
(Department of Town Planning).  Within each office, we met with several individuals and learned
of various aspects of the programs, in the City-state Hamburg to identify and manage hazardous
sites.  Mr. Wolf and several members of his stlaff accompanied us on the visit to Georgsverde.
                                      253

-------
         aerial contamination (3 large sites previously belonging to,
         industrial firms);
         factory grounds  (17 sites including old gas works);
         dumping sites with known chemical wastes (11 sites);
         other (5 sites where the source of the contamination is unknown).

Department Of Environmental Protection for Hamburg

    This Department (Fauchamt Fur Uberwachung Umweltbehorde) consists of about
360 people.  About 40 people are involved in environmental planning, about, 100
in permitting, about 100  in inspection and enforcement, and about 120 in
measurements  (Anstalt fur Hygiene)._  Concerns of the department range from
environmental exposure to toxic chemicals to problems from methane buildup in
homes.
    Methane problems from municipal waste landfills are the focus of; one
current study.  Homes or  other buildings are built on several of the 39
landfill sites in Hamburg.  Preparations are being made to measure levels of
methane in these buildings beginning in the summer of 1985.  Hydrogen sulfide
will also be measured in  those locations where the odor is apparent.  No real
problems have yet occurred  (i.e., no explosions caused by accumulation of
methane generated by disposed waste), but it is recognized that this could
happen.
    Among the responsibilities of the Anstalt fur Hygiene  (Institute for
Hygiene) are the development of recommendations for action levels to guide the
cleanup of contaminated land, sampling and analysis that is performed as part
of site assessments, and  assessment of soil contamination.  Specific groups
within the Institute are  responsible for recommending action levels of
polluting materials in groundwater, drinking water, wastewater, soil, and air.
Although there is no official policy regarding the relationship between
acceptable pollutant thresholds and different types of land use, there is some
support for this concept
                                     254

-------
    The Institute develops and eval'
chemical contamination of soils and
major pollutants of interest are di
 lates methods to characterize and quantify
  the associated risks.   Thus,  there is
interest in methods and approaches  ;hat have been developed by others that
might be suitable for determining specific pollutants in soils.  Among the
 >xin,  arsenic,  phenols,  cresols,  and
volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons.
    There is considerable interest in levels"of arsenic and lead, since these
elements are commonly found in soils and in vegetation in Hamburg.  The
background levels in surface soils are abnormally high due to smelting in the
area.  (The largest copper smelter in Europe is located in southeast Hamburg.)
The city of Hamburg is a very densely populated area, and, consequently,
contaminated sites and surrounding properties are likely to be used by people.
Some people depend on vegetables grown in allottments (gardens) very close to
the fence of the smelter.  Soil in  :hese vegetable gardens may be contaminated
with heavy metals that have accumulated as a result of fallout from the
smelter and through buildup from composting.  There is less concern about
heavy metal contamination of ground-water from the fallout from smelting since
drinking water for the city of Hamburg is taken from very deep aquifers (200-
3 00 meters).
    Although there are no official guidelines to assess soil contamination,
threshold levels for certain heavy metals, based on average background levels,
are recognized.  These levels are intended to indicate what is normal in
T
uncontaminated soils.  The background levels are based on data obtained though
a literature research and published
Federal Biological Research Office,
  in 1977  by Prof.  Dr.  Kloke,  Head of
  Berlin.   The uncontaminated soil levels
also serve as the basis for acceptable levels of heavy metals in sewage sludge
that is spread for agricultural purposes.  These soil levels are based .on Dr.
Kloke's summary listed in Table 18.               .
    Dioxin (Tetracholorodibenzodioxin),  also referred to as TCDD, is a major
concern in Hamburg and throughout Germany.  The highly toxic 2,3,7,8-isomer,
as well as other TCDD isomers and homologs and chlorinated furans, are all of
T
interest.  Several waste disposal sites that received wastes from the
                                     255

-------
      TABLE 18.  NORMAL AND ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF ELEMENTS IN SOILS
Element
Level in Air-Dried
normal
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Lead
Boron
Bromine
Cadmium
Chromium
Fluorine
Cobalt
Copper
Molybdenum
Nickel
Mercury
Selenium
Vanadium
Zinc
Tin
0.1 -
2
1 -
0.1 -
5
1 —
0.1 -
10
50
•i _
5 —
1
10
0.1 -
0.1 -
10
10
1
0.5
20
5
20
30
10
1
50
200
10
20
5
50
1
5
100
50
20
Soil (in mg/kg_}_
acceptable
5 (?)
20 ;
10
100
25
10
3 +
100
200
50
100
5
50
2 +
10
50
300
50 :,
Source:  Kloke, 1977
Level was originally listed as 5.
Revision by Dr. Kloke in 1979.
                                   256

-------
 production  of  2,4,5-trichlorophenol
 now contain a  mixture  of  chlorinated
 (2,4,5-T) are known, and these sites all
 organics, including dioxins and furans.
 The guidelines  developed by  Dr.  Renazta  Kimbrow of  the U.S.  Centers  for
 Disease Control are widely recognized and used  as guidance  in assessing  risks
 from  such  sites.  Also used  is the approach by  Dr.  Rappe, a Swedish  scientist
 who has proposed factors to  take into account the presence  of various dioxins
 and furans other than the 2,3,7,8-ison
                                     omer.
Landscape Planning and Town Planning
    There are two levels of planning
planning.  These are represented in

Department of Landscape Planning —
 for Hamburg
 in Hamburg — landscape planning and town
two separate ministries.
    The Department of Landscape Planning for Hamburg was formed in 1978, and,
in 1985, consisted of about 20 people.  The Department is responsible for
general planning and for coordination with building and town planning.
    The City-State of Hamburg has se4-en different counties, each with its own
planning authority.  The central planning is coordinated through the Landscape
Planning Department which considers the entire State as landscape.  The
philosophy of the department is that
the same in both natural and built-uj
    The green areas are the specific
Landscape Planning.  Their policy is
 the quality of the environment should be
  areas.
 responsibility of the Department of
 to keep green areas green.   In areas
where there is contamination, the objective is to change the specific land use
to be compatible with unavoidable contamination while retaining the
traditional green use.  An example of this is a case where land is found to be
unsuitable for allottments but can still be retained for recreational use.
The Landscape Planning Office maintains information about existing levels of
contamination so that this knowledge
Department is responsible for water quality criteria for the whole Hamburg
State.
 is  available  for land use planning.   The
                                    257

-------
    The Department of Landscape Planning is also responsible for identifying
areas where dumping should be allowed.  Since there is a continuing need for
such areas, this is an important aspect of planning.  The approach is to
assemble information'on the ecology of candidate areas and to project the
impact of dumping at each site.
    The Department is currently developing a system for biomonitoririg to
assess old dump sites that received household and chemical wastes.  Two
Biomonitoring approaches, using insects or mice trapped on contaminated sites,
are being considered.   Although no results have been obtained using the
insects, the approach involving mice appears to have merit.  Data obtained so
far indicate that low levels of chemical contaminants can be found in the
livers of certain species of mice taken from contaminated sites.
    Mice tend to range about 100 square meters and burrow to a depth of about
50 cm.  Therefore the level of a chemical in the liver of a mouse should be an
indicator of the level of contamination over this area.  There is a potential
advantage in the biomonitoring  (as compared to the traditional method of
analyzing multiple soil samples from different sectors and depths at a site)
since fewer samples need to be taken in order to survey an area.  Because
chlorinated hydrocarbons are known to concentrate in the livers, this organ is
expected to be a-particularly sensitive indicator of contamination. < Typically
ten mouse livers are combined for one analysis at a cost of about 5,000 DM
($1,580 U.S.).
    The biomonitoring approach has been tested at Mulldeponie Georgsverde, a
hazardous waste landfill southeast of the center of Hamburg.  It is known that
the leachate from this landfill contains dioxins and other chlorinated
hydrocarbons.  Because of the suspected presence of dioxin, this site has been
studied intensively.  The objective of the study conducted by the Department
of Landscape Planning was to compare  levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons in
livers of mice taken from Georgsverde with levels in mice taken from an area
that was presumed to be uncontaminated.
    Three different types of mice were taken and tested.  A type of mouse that
feeds almost entirely on other  animals was found to be the most sensitive
indicator of contaminated soil.  A second type of mouse that eats a mixed diet
                                     258

-------
 (both meat  and vegetables)  showed  some  contamination.  A third  type  of mouse
 that  is  totally vegetarian  was  determined not  to be useful  since  no
 chlorinated hydrocarbons were detected  in the  livers.  An unexpected finding
 from  the expe'riment was the presence of chlorinated hydrocarbons  in  mice  from
 the area presumed  to be clean.  Analytical data from the livers tested showed
 levels of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins up to 120 times the background
 concentration  in soils.  Identifying the source of the contaminants  is the
 responsibility of  another department
    The results to date do not sugge
concentration and the soil concentre
Department of Town Planning —
    The Department of Town Planning
                  st an exact correlation between the liver
                  tion at a particular site.  This is
because the contaminants bioaccumulc te.  It has been noted that the tetra- and
penta-chloro isomers tend to bioaccvmulate to a greater extent than the hexa-
and octa-isomers.  Further investigation of the biomohitoring approach is
planned.  The indicator chemical will probably be pentachlorophenol or
hexachlorocyclohexane.  It is believed that this is the only investigation in
Germany involving biomonitoring usirg mice.
                  is much larger than the Department of
Landscape Planning.  Building, as well as energy and wastewater are the
responsibility of the town planning office.
    The department has recently completed a survey of heavy metals
concentrations at 1,000 sampling points throughout Hamburg.  Samples were
taken from a depth of 5 cm and analyzed for copper, chromium, nickel, zinc,
cadmium, lead, arsenic, and mercury.
based on professional judgement rather than random samples from a strict grid
system.  The results of the analyses
The highest levels detected for the
                   are stored in a computerized data base.
                  pollutants of most concern are as follows:
        arsenic
        lead
        copper
        cadmium
 918 ppm
3074 ppm
3156 ppm
 278 ppm
Based on this work, arsenic appears
concern in soil.
                    The location of the sampling points was
                  ;o be the most probable pollutant of
                                    259

-------
Contaminated Sites in Hamburg

    Several interesting sites were discussed during our interviews with the
various Hamburg Departments.  Two of these sites are the landfill known as
Georgsverde and a site referred to as Goldbekhaus.

Muldeponie Georgsverde, Hamburg —
    The Georgsverde site is located about five kilometers south of the Hamburg
City Hall in an area that has been used for many years for nonferrous
smelting.  Both municipal and chemical wastes were dumped in an area called
Mueggenburger until about 1967.  In 1967, the property was purchased,, and
housing was built on land adjacent to the disposal area.  Part of the area was
also used for wire storage.  Chemical wastes were brought to a new area, now
known as Georgsverde, which comprises some 44 hectares  (110 acres) with a
perimeter of 2.6 kilometers.  Among the wastes placed in Georgsverde were
large volumes of residues from a chemical firm that produced 2,4,5-T.  These
wastes are now known to contain dioxin which was produced as an unwanted by-
product  in the production of 2,4,5-T.
    The whole area was filled with household wastes.  About 1967, a  series of
ten ponds was built to receive liquid industrial wastes.  The first  ponds were
unlined.  Those constructed later had liners.   Industrial waste  from
throughout Hamburg was brought to this site.  Actually  only nine  ponds were
used.    Household waste was deposited on top of  the  liquid waste  to  absorb the
liquid.  The original  idea  was that by codisposing the  wastes in  this manner
there would be  sufficient biological activity to degrade the industrial waste
as well  as the  municipal waste.   It has  been estimated  that about 30 percent
of the wastes placed  in Georgesverde were chlorinated solvents,  about  30
percent  were mineral wastes,  and about  40 percent  were  other types.
     The  situation is  now recognized as  a significant environmental problem.
Leachate (oil  and water)  seeping from the east  side  of  the hill  flows  into a
ditch that feeds  into an oil/water separator.   After separation  of the oil.
                                      260

-------
 which comprises about 10 to 15 perc«nt of the total liquid, the water drains
 into a ditch which discharges to a public treatment works.  The oil recovered
 in the separator contains ECB's, chlorophenols,  chlorobenzenes,
 hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH),  and didxins.
     Wells have been installed throughout the entire area to evaluate the
 problem.   There are 25 wells  around the perimeter.   Only very low
 concentrations of toxics have been found in groundwater samples.   The toxics
 appear to be strongly adsorbed to the soil,  particularly in the clay layer
 just below the natural surface soil.   There is a sand layer beneath this clay
 layer,  so there is concern for the future  when the  toxics eventually migrate
 through the clay.
     Methane gas  is  generated in the
                                     landfill due to biodegradation of the
municipal  waste.   Although grasses  and scrubby  plants with shallow root
 systems  grow on the  site,  the  plants
                                     die when the root systems reach the depth
where  the  gas-fills  the  void space  rather  than water.  A gas  recovery  system
is  in  place with 39  wells.   One problem with the gas recovered at  the  site  is
that it  contains up  to 10 ppm of vinyl chloride, and this has become a
                                     potential.
                                    1th Georgesverde are believed to be
political issue because of the toxic
    The principal risks associated w
potential groundwater contamination knd the exposure of people living in a
low-lying area adjacent to the site.  These people do not actually own the
land, and they pay no rent.  The dwellings are minimal and crowded, and the
many vegetable gardens suggest that :he people consume food grown in soils
that are most likely contaminated by
                                     runoff from Georgsverde.
    The government of Hamburg recognizes that Georgsverde requires long-term
management.  Remedial action at the site is planned to minimize infiltration.
Construction will- include a berm of earth and plastic, a slurry wall 30 to 50
meters deep (down to the deep clay layer), and a new cap of clay and plastic.
The cap will be covered with 1.5 meters of topsoil.  Construction of the cap
is scheduled to begin in the spring of 1988.  Leachate from the site will
require treatment with oil separation as a first step.  The water will then be
biologically treated and passed through activated carbon.  An alternative that
is being considered is vacuum distil]
                                     ation.
                                     261

-------
    The thorniest problem  is what  to  do  about  the dioxin-contaminated oil from
Georgsverde.  Presently  it is being collected  in drums and stored in metal
sheds at the site.  The  storage  area  is  fenced and guarded.   (We observed
about 75 of these drums  which we were told .contained the dioxin-contaminated
oil.)  The ultimate fate of these  drums  is still to be decided.  Currently
there is no incinerator  or landfill in Europe  that will accept the oil because
of the high level of  dioxin.  Herr Bouchon,  head of the Environmental
Authority for Hamburg expressed  concern  because the various alternatives for
disposal of the dioxin-contaminated waste are  all prohibited by government
regulations.  He believes  that incineration at sea is the best alternative.
    What to do about  Georgsverde has  been a highly debated topic and a very
political one.  In spring  1984,  several  toxicology experts were invited to
Hamburg to participate in  a workshop  on  Georgsverde and to advise on possible
solutions to the contamination problems.
    An extensive four volume  report on Georgsverde has been compiled by the
Hamburg Department of Town Planning.   Volume'1 gives the site history. Volume
2 is the planning program. Volume 3  is  the record of the first hearing.
Volume 4 is the analytical data.  Volume 5 is  record of the second hearing.
    An interesting note is that  in 1977  there  was a proposal for extensive use
of the site for recreational  purposes including a swimming pool with a slide
area and bath house.   These plans  were halted when toxic compounds were found
in the oils leaching  from the site.

Goldbekhaus, Hamburg—
    The Goldbekhaus  site includes  about 6400 square meters and several build-
ings. The site  contamination  first came to the attention of the authorities
through calls  from citizens complaining of odors at the site.  The Public
Health Authority notified the Hamburg Amt fur Umweltschutz of the problem  in
April 1984.              .
 Author's Note:  Information on Goldbekhaus was provided to us by Ms.  Doris Menke and Mr. Klans
 Hochreiter of the Hamburg Department of Environmental Protection.
                                      262

-------
              This  site was an  old factory  that operated until  1960 producing
          disinfectants and detergents.   The oJ
                                      d buildings  are  now being used for public
          meetings, and  there  is a desire to keep the buildings  for a community center
          or similar purpose.  The site  is. knodn by three different names—Moorfurtweg
           (maybe the name of the street); Goldbekhaus  (maybe the name for  its current
          use); and Schulke &  Mayr (the  name off the former factory that operated there).
               The site assessment involved borings and analyses  of soil samples taken at
                                               ite was found to  be heavily contaminated
          with phenols and cresols.  Water samples showed phenols, cresols, and
.
          chlorophenols.  Samples were analyzed
          individual species.  Total phenols i
                                       for total phenols as well as  for
                                       soil samples were determined  at levels
as high as 26 to 27 g/kg.   Phenols and cresols were found at very high  levels
in water samples taken  from wells drilled down to 30 to 40 meters deep.
              There has been some discussion of
                                      tearing down the buildings, but this  is
          an unpopular approach.  Nothing has keen done yet because the authorities do
          not know what to do.  The site is used by young people for a variety of
          activities.  The former owner of the
                                     site has left the area, and the land
                                                                                    now
          belongs to the City of Hamburg.
              It remains to be decided what concentration of contaminants will be deemed
          acceptable and allowed to remain on the site.  The basis will probably be the
          recognized guidelines for ground-wateb—(i.e., 0.05 mg/L total phenols.)  This
          is the guideline used in the Netherlands,  currently.  The main concern is the
          protection of ground-water.  Biological treatment of soil and surface water
          are being considered as possible optibns for cleanup.  The question is how
                                              :s should be used as the indicator of
long it will take and which component
treatment effectiveness.  Funding to
been requested.
    Another concern is the risk associated-with inhalation of the contaminants
present.  There are many houses in th
participate in activities held on the
                                               proceed with the treatment scheme has
                                               2 vicinity of the site,  and many people
                                                site.   Some parts of the buildings are
          closed off to minimize exposure to vapors from soil contamination.
                                              263

-------
THE RUHR DISTRICT

    The Ruhr district  (Ruhrgebiet)  in  the  state  of  Nordrhein-Westfalen is
perhaps the largest  industrial area in Europe.   Located between the Ruhr and
Lippe rivers, the area  is well known for its  coal industry,  iron and steel
working and manufacturing of  chemicals, textiles, and glass.   Important cities
in the region include Essen,  Dortmund,  Duisberg, and Bochum.   Environmental
problems associated  with the  residue from  more than 100 years of heavy
industrial activities are prevalent throughout the  Ruhrgebiet.

The WBK

    The WBK is  a non-profit making joint organization of the coal industry.
In the Ruhr District,  the WBK maintains vocational  mining schools, Testing
Institutes for  Mine  Safety, and Technical-Scientific Institutes.  The work is
funded by the member organizations, fees,  and the  State.  The abbreviation WBK
stands for Westfalische Berggewerkschaftskasse which was founded some 120
years ago.
    The WBK since  1961 has  been systematically mapping the subsurface of the
Ruhr Valley.  By 1985,  mapping  was complete,  going down more than 1000 m, for
approximately 65 percent of the area.   These maps  show the geological
formations, permeabilities  and hydraulic gradients, and the quality and
quantity of groundwater.

Contaminated Sites in the Ruhr District

Recovery Schemes by the WBK —
    During the  last 30 years, the  Institute of Applied Geology, WBK, has
carried out numerous recovery schemes for contaminated land.   Examples of
these efforts were described by Dr. W. G.  Coldewey  in his presentation to the
 Authors' Note:  Our host in the Ruhr region was Dr. W. G. Coldewey of the WBK Institute for
 Applied Geology in Bochum.
                                      264

-------
 NATO/CCMS Meeting in Hamburg in 1984.   Highlights  of  three  of  these  examples
 are  given below:
     Capping  of  a  salt slag  tip;   Investigations  at a  salt slag tip in  the
 Central  Ruhr district revealed a cor siderable  increase  in the  chloride and
 sulphate contents in groundwater neer  the  tip.   The mineral content  of the
 water was sufficient to  be  aggressive  to concrete.  As  the'  tip was open to the
 elements, harmful substances could be  leached  from the  body of the tip.  To
 prevent  such leaching processes,  capping the tip with low-permeability
 material was recommended.
    The capping material used was a
underground railway construction  sites.  Loess loam was also used as a capping
material.  The capping to a thickness of 0.8 mg and appropriate slope
contouring were designed to prevent
and thus eliminate  leaching from the
    Capping of an aluminum slag tip:
is intended for the disposal of the
building rubble.
    The aluminum slag disintegrates
low permeability marlstone obtained from
the tip from being affected by the weather
 waste material  (Coldeway, 1984).
  Some 1700 tonnes of aluminum slag were
deposited in a waste tip in the south of the Central Ruhr district.  The tip
waste produced by coal washeries and
rapidly when contacted by water.
Hydrolysis of the aluminates, nitrides and phosphides gives rise to exothermic
reations and generation of ammonia and phosphine.  The slag material is found
to contain 25 percent water-soluble
constituents, principally sodium and
potassium chloride.
    Because of the exothermic reactibns, the part of the tip containing
combustible coal material was separa
deposited aluminum slag. ' Next, the
thickness of 1 m.  The slopes were r
ted by bulldozer from the part with -the
slag,tip was capped with loam to a
scontoured, and the whole site was planted
with shallow-rooting plants.  These measures were designed to prevent leaching
and gas generation  (Coldeway, 1984).
    Remedial action of a site contaminated with cyanide-containing hardening
salts;  Approximately 500 tonnes of
other residues were deposited withou
L
yanide-containing hardening salts and
:  permission on a building .rubble tip in
rfas  situated in a sewage sludge settling
the Central Ruhr district.  The tip •
pond at an old chemical works.  Abou: the same quantity was deposited without
adequate safety measures on an adjoining industrial site.

                                    265

-------
    The remedial action program consisted, first, in pumping the cyanide water
from the sludge settling pond, partly detoxifying the sludge in tanks by means
of hypochloride oxidation in an alkaline medium, and finally pumping it by
pipeline into the main Ruhr district sewer.  Considerable quantities of
ferrous sulphate and lime hydrate were added to the contaminated rubb,le for
the purpose of complexing the cyanides.  The salt barrels were sealed by
encasement in concrete and later sunk in the Atlantic.  (Coldeway, 1984; Birk,
et al, 1973) .

Coking Industry Sites —
    Coking plants and their auxiliary operations previously occupied several
tracts of land in an industrial area, Bochum-Werne.  The Robert Muser Kokerei,
a cokery and gas works, was owned and operated by a mining company until it
was closed about 1974.  The local authority subsequently purchased the site
for redevelopment.
    To prepare such sites for redevelopment, existing buildings were removed
and clean fill, up to a meter in depth was brought in to cover the site.
Buildings to suit the new tenant are then erected with assistance from the
State development company (the LEG).  These minimal measures sometimes proved
to be insufficient.                                                  :
    A bread company entered into an agreement to locate on the former Robert
Muser Kokerei site.  During excavation for the new building, however, old
foundations and coal tar residue from the old gas works were encountered.  The
local authorities assumed responsibility for the cleanup.  Plans of the old
gas works and information provided by former employer were used in an effort
to locate the areas of the site that were contaminated.  Bore hole samples
were also taken and examined.  Appropriate measures were taken to eliminate
future exposure to the contaminated material.
    Another coking plant site in the area, Kokerei Alma, contained a ;lagoon
that had been used for several years to receive acid resin from a benzene
plant (located at a different site).  The lagoon area was lined with chalk
sludge from ammonia production and a layer of coal fines.  These lining
                                     266

-------
materials  provided a fairly effective sorbent  system for water soluble
components in the resin.  To neutralize the contents of the lagoon, chalk
rubble was added.  Ultimately the resin hardened.  When the site was closed,
it was capped with a low permeability material,  followed by clean soil to
minimize infiltration from surface water.
    Groundwater contamination in the area was  discovered when observation
wells were drilled during a site investigation.  Initially the problem was
attributed to the lagoon.  It was later determined,  however,  that a more
likely source of the groundwater contamination was the  wastewater from the old
coking and gas plants in the vicinity.
    The cleanup of this area began about 1975  and continued into 1985.
Redevelopment at several sites,  inc:.uding the  bread  company,  was complete or
nearly complete in 1985.

THE CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN REGIONS

Waste Control in the State of Hessei
    The Environmental Protection Office located in Wiesbaden is responsible
for all solid waste problems in the
an advisory  function to the Ministry
State of Hessen.  In addition to serving
,  they establish -regulations  and controls
for solid waste.
    A survey of  landfill sites in the State of Hessen began  in 1979.   Letters
were sent to all  industrial firms iii the state requesting  information on the
kinds of waste their processes generate and where their past and current
wastes were placed.   The voluntary response to the survey  was good,  although
the quality of the  responses was vai
iable.  This survey was almost  complete in
1985.  Of about  35,000  waste locations identified, probably  5 percent or less
are problematic.  No  instances of health effects attributable to  disposal
sites have been  reported from any of  the sites identified.
Authors' Note:  our host in the Central Regie n of Germany'was Dr. Manfred Stammler of Battelle
Institute, Frankfort.  The information provided in this section was provided to us by Dr.
Stammler and by representatives of the Envircnmental Protection Office, State of Hessen.
                                     267

-------
    The State of Hessen began in January 1985 looking at about 50 locations
where waste is buried near wells that supply community drinking water.  Water
samples will be taken and analyzed for chemical oxygen demand, chlorinated
organics, and heavy metals.

Site of Chemical Plant Firma Merck                                   ;

    This plant produced Lindane from about 1946 until 1965.  Some 100,000
tonnes of hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) residue from this production remained
piled at the site after the production ceased.  Sludge and wastewater from the
plant were also spread on the ground.  Leachate from the mountains of residue
drained into the sandy areas around the site, and wind also distributed the
solid residue.  This resulted in the presence of HCH in grass, animals, and
milk from cows grazed in the area.  The contamination was found in 1979.  The
area of contamination was determined based on soil samples from the top 30
centimeters.  The HCH at levels above 10 ppm affected a very large area.
    Remedial action to alleviate the problem began in 1982 or 1983 and
continued into 1985.  The areas of highest levels of contamination were
excavated and then filled using soil from a sugar-beet processing plant.  In
other areas, the contaminated soil was mixed down to about one meter with
residue from the sugar beet processing.  Restrictions on the land use  (e.g.,
area cannot be used to grow crops for animal feed) remain in place due to the
possible presence of dioxin.  An acceptable reuse of the land has not yet been
established.

Schwabisch-Gmund Gas Works

    When the city began excavation in the early 1980's for an underground
parking garage, they encountered contaminated materials associated with coal
gas production.  An archives search revealed that the city had previously
operated a gas works at the site.  (Such works were shut down prior to 1960,
and apparently this former use of the city property had been virtually
forgotten.)  A site investigation was undertaken to determine the extent of
the contamination.  Some groundwater contamination was discovered, although
                                     268

-------
 this  did not cause major concern since the nearest drinking water recovery
 area  was very far away.  An effort was made to remove  all  of the contaminated
material  from the site.  Excavation
and removal of the material was  the only
solution that was considered acceptsble.  Because of the  extensive excavation
required,  the city decided to add a [lower level to the garage than what was
originally planned.  Construction of the garage was completed by 1985.
                                     j
                                     I
                                     i                .    •     '
                                     !          '          •     "    •   •
CASE STUDY:  HAVIGHORSTER MOOR DUMP 3lTE, HAMBURG
                                     i
                                     I
Land Use History                    !
                                     I   •  	'   ,....-'•.•        '  '
                                     i
                                     i
    This 30,000  square meter Hamburg site is owned by the State.   It was used
as a dumping area after World War II (probably illegally).
Nature and  Extent of the Contamination
                                     i

    In the  early  1970's,  very high levels of arsenic were found  in  a small
stream near the old disposal site,  At first the arsenic contamination was
assumed to  have originated from burijed slag from an old copper plant.   An
investigation, however,  revealed that the water contamination resulted from a
water soluble  form of arsenic used s(ome 40 years ago in paint manufacture.
Remediation Activities
    An extensive  cleanup operation was undertaken by the State to remedy  the
arsenic contamination and to prevent
 further surface and groundwater
contamination.  Highly contaminated 'soil (i.e., soil containing arsenic at  a
level of greater  than  300  ppm)  was removed from the site to a permitted
disposal facility.  About  600  cubic meters of soil containing between  50 and
300 ppm of arsenic were buried on site in a pit lined with plastic and 0.5
                                     I    '  , .    -,   • ;..   ,.'.',    .. ' ,  '
Authors'. Note:  Information on Havighorstar was provided by Ms. Doris Menke, Hamburg Department
of Environmental Protection and Dr. Sievers off the Institute for Hygiene.
                                     !269

-------
meter of clay.  The disposal pit was also capped with clay to prevent
infiltration of rainwater.  The remediation scheme was designed to isolate the
contaminated material buried on site in order to protect groundwater beneath
the site.  The cleanup of arsenic at the site was completed in 1975 at a cost
of 2,000,000 DM ($814,600 U.S.).  The cost of the cleanup was paid by the
                                                                     I
State of Hamburg.

Guidelines for Cleanup

    A level of 50 ppm, based on average background levels, was used to guide
                                                                     i
the cleanup of arsenic.  A threshold level of 50 ppm is, in general,
considered to be very low as a cleanup guide, since up to 200 ppm is found in
many urban areas, particularly in Southeast Hamburg where there has been
copper smelting for many years.  The unusually low level  (50 ppm) was used in
this case because the chemical form of the arsenic found at Havighorst was
very soluble compared to the inorganic arsenic normally associated with copper
smelting.

Later Remediation Activities

    After the cleanup to remedy the arsenic contamination was completed,
attention was again focused on the Havighorster site when odors became
apparent in seepage water issuing from the south side of the landfill.  A
drainage system was installed to control runoff and to collect the seepage
water.  Samples showed very low levels (less than 5 ppm) of
hexachlorocyclohexane  (HCH), chlorinated benzenes, and phenols.
    There are plans to build a collection pond with treatment of the conteimi-
nated water based on a system that uses an aquatic plant, common reed, to
remove organics from municipal wastewater.  Treatment in this manner was first
proposed by Professor Kickuth of the University of Kassel; it is called
"Kickuth'sches Wurzelraumverfahren"  (R. Kikuth, 1983; 1971).  The purpose of
the reed (Phragmites communis) is to lower the levels of organic carbon.  The
roots of the plants take up the organics.  The Kikuth System is claimed to
have been used effectively in secondary treatment of sewage sludge.
                                     270

-------
                                    i
    The Havighorster Moor removal pond is the first time the scheme has  been
used to treat water containing industrial chemicals such as HCH, chlorinated
benzene, and phenols.   The pond will be lined with bentonite and also  with
                                    I
plastic.  The drainage  system is lined with chalk.
    The total cost of the project is estimated at around 300/000 DM  ($94,770
U.S.), and maintenance  costs shouldibe low.  The pond was scheduled to be
completed in fall 1985,  and the system should be fully operational by  late
                                    I  '
1986.  A windmill will  pump water from the pond to a river where it will be
discharged at an estimated rate of 25 cubic meters per day.  The pond  will be
fenced in order to limit access.  (The area was not fenced at the time of our
visit to Hamburg.)                  j
    There is some controversy over the proposed treatment scheme.  Some
                                    !
researchers dismiss the reports of this system's success with municipal
wastewaters, claiming that the reported purification capacity data for the
Kikuth System neglected the effectsjof dilution by run-off  (Braunschweig,
1985).  Other researchers believe that the system will work initially, but
that the plants will soon die because of the particular contaminants present
in the seepage water.   It will be necessary to monitor both the influent and
effluent in order to evaluate the performance of the system.
                                    i
                                    i
Site Reuse                          j
                                    i
                                    i
    The site is not being used nor are there any plans for its reuse.  Nearby
property is used for recreation.

                                    i
CASE STUDY: BRAKE DUMPSITE,  BIELEFELD

    The City of Bielefeld is located near the Teutoburg Forest area of the
Ruhr Valley in West Germany.  Bielefeld has a population in excess of  315,000
Authors' Note:  Information on the Brake site was provided by Mr. W. Weber, City of Bielefeld;
Dr. H. J. Collins,  Technical University Braunschweig; Mr. Bouteilles, Attorney; and Dr. Dienian,
University of Bielefeld.                 I
                                    i 271

-------
people and is an industrial center which initially based its growth on the
textile industry.  Important industries in the city now include machine
building, food and sweets, clothing, street vehicles, and electronics.

Land Use History

    Brake is a suburb northeast of Bielefeld that was annexed into the city in
1973.  The former Brake dumpsite occupies about 2 hectares  (5 acres).  Before
1960 the site was used as a clay borrow pit by a brick factory.  The brick
company later sold the site to a farmer, who hired it for waste disposal.
Although the site was an official dumpsite, unoffical (and unrecorded) dumping
also took place.  Records exist of the materials that were disposed legally.
Eventually the land was purchased by a developer.  After 1976, when dumping
was stopped, plans for the development of a housing area were submitted by the
developer and approved by the city.  Building started in 1978.

Nature and Extent of Contamination

    Prior to beginning the development of the area, the developer covered the
area with 2 m of clean soil.  Shortly after the first houses were built in
Brake, however, evidence of contamination was seen.  Galvanic sludge was
uncovered by inhabitants digging in the area.  However,  examination of garden
vegetables,  especially spinach, which is sensitive to contamination, showed no
difference in contamination when compared to market samples.  Methane buildup,
possibly due to the 2 m of low permeability cover soil on the site, was also
noted.  The concentrations of methane varied from area to area, decreasing as
the location of the samples approached the houses.  No methane was found in
                                     272

-------
the basements of the houses.  It was believed that methane was released
through the drainage systems around
the houses.   Other contaminants including
heavy metals, mercury, selenium, sulfuric acid, and cyanides were found at
very low levels.  Because they could not guarantee the homeqwners that there
                                   I       .         •
would be no adverse effects, the local government felt compelled to become
involved.                          i    .
Remediation Activities
    The methane buildup underground
was vented, but gas formation continued.
Ventilators and pumps have been installed in basements, along with methane
detectors.  Six months after installation in August 1984, none of these
detectors had alarmed.  Consideration is being given regarding the cap on the
site and whether or not to pump the!water out and treat it.  Further, there is
a need to be able to monitor groundwater quality.
    Although the levels of contaminants found are quite low and
epidemiological studies have shown no significant difference between the
groups living on the site and those| iri other areas, cleanup will be in excess
                                    i
of MIK levels.  The epidemiological|studies examined blood and urine samples
from 400 people on the site, nearby
were found, although elevated liver
groups.
 and some distance away.  No differences
enzyme levels were found in all the
Site Reuse
    A number of unanswered questions have been raised by the problems at the
Brake site.  The City of Bielefeld is responsible for land use planning at
                                   i
Brake and for issuing building permits for the existing and future structures.
Legal responsibility has not yet been assigned, and some people have
questioned why the permits to buildjwere ever granted.  A variety of
arrangements are being considered for the owners of the homes in the
                                     273

-------
 contaminated area.   The city offered to buy the home of any Brake resident  who
 wished to relocate.   Twenty to thirty owners plan to move to a new site and
 will receive the market value for their houses.  The value of the houses has
 fallen by 2/3 since  the contamination has  been made public.   If the city can
 satisfactorily monitor the site and the houses, they plan to sell the  houses
 sometime in the future.
     As a result of the problems at Brake,  the city has  attempted to identify
 similar sites throughout Bielefeld.   Through newspaper  appeals,  500 sites in
 the  area have been identified as potentially contaminated.           ,

 CASE STUDY:  INDUSTRIAL WASTE SITE,  DORTMUND

     The City of Dortmund is located in the highly industrialized and densely
 populated Ruhr Valley Region.   In 1985,  remediation activities were underway
 at this former industrial site near Dortmund when the Authors visited  the
 site.

 Site History and Redevelopment Objectives

     The site had been used for many  years  as  a  dumping area  for  a variety of
 industrial wastes including coal  gasification and refinery wastes.   Following
 the  remedial action,  the  5.3 hectare (13 acre)  site will be  redeveloped  as an
 industrial property.

Nature  and Extent of  the  Contamination

     Excavations  at the  site  revealed extensive  contamination.  Liquid coal tar
was  clearly  visible to  a  depth of 10 meters along with volatile hydrocarbons
and  sulfur compounds.   Large quantities of spent  iron oxide  (containing sulfur
and  complexed cyanides) from gas purification were also present.
                                     274

-------
Remediation Activities
    Remediation at this  site  involved excavation and treatment of the waste
and contaminated soil and water by mixing (on site)  with brown lignite fly ash
using a patented process  (Heide and
 Werner,  1984).   The treated material was
finally disposed in a  specially designed concrete pit with a flexible membrane
liner located on the site.   The linipd disposal site is shown in Figure 30.
This site cleanup was  the  first application of the technology on such a large
scale.  The remediation work is being performed by H. Becker, b.v., the
contracting firm who holds  the process license.  This cleanup approach is
expected to result in  considerable cost savings over an alternative plan
involving removal of the contaminated material to an off-site licensed
disposal facility.
I
    The treatment/solidification process relies on the pozzolanic properties
of the brown lignite  fly  ash.   The ash used at this site was obtained from
local'power plants burning brown lignite coal.  The contaminated soil, tars,
                                    i
and water are mixed with  the ash in| a three-stage reactor along with
additional water.  The  exothermic reaction must be controlled carefully in
                                    i
order to maintain a continuous  flowithrough the mixers.  During the reaction,
the temperature may reach 120°C.   The product  exiting the final mixing stage
is a freely flowable  slurry and is conveyed directly to the lined pit.  Within
approximately 30 minutes,  the slurry hardens to a solid material which is
                                    I •
claimed to be virtually impermeable to water.   Data from laboratory tests
indicate that metals, sulfates,  cyanides,  and organics are bound tightly in
the treated material  and  are not leached even under rigorous conditions.
                                    !
Solid wastes, fluid suspensions,  and sludges can all be treated by this
process, being combined with the fly ash in amounts up to 50 percent by
weight.  Between 20 and 40 percent water is required in the process.
Authors' Note:  Our visit to the Dortmund sipe was led by Mr. H. Becker, owner of the company
carrying out the site cleanup; Dr.  Werner, who patented the process being used; and Dr. H. J.
Karpe and Mr. L. Kotter of the University of I Dortmund.
                                     275

-------
                                            0)

                                           4J
                                           •H

                                            M

                                           4->

                                            CO
                                            a
                                           •H
                                           a

                                            0)
                                           X!
                                           4J
                                           4J

                                           •H

                                            ft
                                            01
                                            o
                                            ft
                                            w
                                           •H
                                            0)

                                            C

                                           •H
                                            tn
                                           •H
                                           t,
276

-------
    One  limiting  factor  in  the process  is the availability of  sufficient
quantities of the lignite fly^asfe which^rad^t*be trucked  in from local power
plants.  The fly  ash  is  stored in two large silos on the site.   The  fly ash  is
fed from the silos to the first stage reactor.  Handling of the fly  ash, a
very  fine fluffy  powder, also presents  some problems.
Site Reuse
    After the remediation  is completed the site will be used again  for heavy
industry.  The site reclamation effort is expected to take at least one year.
Criteria for Cleanup
                                    I
    The State authorities granted approval for the site cleanup plan after two
years of reviewing the data to support the proposed process and considering
other alternatives.  Protection of groundwater was the major concern.  The pit
containing the solidified waste will be monitored to insure that there is no
leaching of contaminants.
                                    I
CASE STUDY:  RAILWAY CAR REPAIR STATION, CENTRAL GERMANY
                                    j .   ..• •
Land Use History and Redevelopment Objectives
    A site in Central Germany was used for about 50 years as a repair station
for the government-owned railway.  After the depot was closed, the property
was transferred within the Federal government and was slated for
redevelopment.  A new high-rise building was planned for the site.
                                    |  1 . , •  .  - -    ,  | -  ,., '    - , -  ,HU1 :' f
Nature and Extent of the Contamination
    Contamination at the site stemmed from spilled diesel fuel and from waste
oil dumped at the site.  The many years of service had left the soil soaked
with diesel fuel and waste oil..  Although an extensive site investigation was
                                     277

-------
not performed,  contamination  resulting  from the former land use was recognized
before  excavation  began  for the new building.

Remediation Activities

    To  avoid exposure of people to the  organic vapors and to eliminate the
potential  for contamination of groundwater, it was decided that excavation and
removal of the  contaminated material was the best approach.  It was estimated
that some  6,000 cubic meters  of soil would have to be excavated for the new
building,  and that some  400 cubic meters of that material would be
contaminated.   Based on  these estimates, removal and disposal of the
contaminated soil  would  not entail extensive extra cost,  since major
excavation was necessary for  construction of the new building.  There was no
indication that the contamination would pose a major hazard to workers at the
site, so no unusual precautions were planned.
    As  the excavation proceeded, a decision had to be made regarding how each
truckload  of soil  should be managed.  The State required that an independent
laboratory supervise the movement of material from the site.  Decisions
regarding  the management of excavated material were based on visual
examination and backed up by  chemical analysis.  The soil was assigned to one
of three categories, depending on the extent of contamination.  The obviously
contaminated soil was hauled  to a hazardous waste disposal facility.  Soil in
which the  extent of contamination was questionable was stored on site until
the results of chemical  analyses were available.  Soil showing no evidence of
contamination could be dumped or retained for use as fill.
    After  the planned excavation was nearly complete,  there was a period of
heavy rain.  Water collected  at the excavated site showed evidence of oil
contamination,  indicating the presence of additional contamination deeper than
initially  expected.  As  a result,  excavation was continued down to hard
bottom.  This required lowering the water table by continuous pumping.  Water
from the pumping wells had to be contained and managed,  even though most of
this water was not contaminated.
                                    278

-------
    Approximately  60,000  cubic meter's of  soil were actually  excavated.   About
 100 cubic meters of  soil  containing fail at  1 percent or higher were
 transported to a treatment  facility jand incinerated in a rotary Kiln at  a  cost
 of about 300 to 400  DM  (about $100 to $130  U.S.) per cubic meter.  Soils at
 0.1 to 1 percent were land  disposed jat a  cost of about 30 DM (about $10) per
 cubic meter.  Soil containing less than 0.1 percent oil were sold or disposed
 off-site at an average  cost of about! 5DM  ($1.7) per cubic meter.
    The cost to alleviate the contamination ultimately involved the extensive
 excavation, water management on-site, sampling and analysis  (to assess
 contamination), haulage of  the contaminated soil, and the disposal and dumping
 fees.  These costs were paid by the government.
Site Reuse
    A high-rise building has been constructed at the site.
CASE STUDY:  GENDORF, ALTOTTING RURAL DISTRICT, BAVARIA
    This site in Gendorf, near Munich, came to the attention of the Bavarian
Ministry for Land Development and Environmental Questions in 1979.
Information from a chemical company indicated that hazardous residues from
Lindane production were deposited oni-site.
                                    r
                                    i
Land Use History
    Hazardous residues from the production of Lindane  (manufactured from 1949-
1954) were deposited on a concrete slab (part of an old foundation) in the
area of the chemical factory.  The deposit had been covered with 0.5 meters of
soil.  A factory road was built in the area in the early 1960s.
                                      79

-------
Nature and Extent of the Contamination

    The pesticide known as Lindane is the gamma isomer of hexachloro-
cydohexane  (HCH) .  In manufacturing Lindane (99% purity), other HCH isomers
as well as other compounds are formed.  Residues from the process are referred
to as "HCH" residues, and are expected to contain a mixture of highly toxic
chlorinated organics.
    To determine the amount of waste deposited at the site and the extent of
the contaminated area, the Bavarian Environmental Protection Agency began an
investigation of the site including exploratory drilling.  Based on data from
37 exploratory holes as well as a review of production documents and
statistics, it was estimated that the site contained about 400 metric tons of
HCH residues at a depth of 2.0 to 2.5 meters.  The area of the deposits was
about 360 square meters.  The material of concern was present as a dry powder
and also as a pasty  sludge.
    The cause for concern stemmed from the toxic properties of the materials
at the site.  Different isomers of HCH exhibit different toxicities.  Certain
isomers are central  nervous system stimulants while others are depressants.
Lindane is reported  to cause liver damage in experimental animals.  HCH has
been reported to cause cancer in mice when administered orally in large doses.
HCH is highly toxic  to aquatic populations.

Remediation Activities

    Two alternatives were considered  for disposal of the HCH residues:

    1)   Excavation  and subsequent disposal in a special  landfill or
         underground salt mine or incineration; and
    2)   Encapsulation to secure the waste on-site.
The second alternative was selected based on results of a risk assessment.
                                     280

-------
     Excavation and removal of the material from the site would have required
 substantial safety precautions such
 as covering the entire waste site with a
 tent  with dust-free entrances and exits and limiting worker exposure to 4
 hours per day (even with safety apparel).   Additional problems were
 anticipated in final disposal of the material.   It was estimated that at least
 one year  would be required to remove 1300  tons  of HCH residues and
 contaminated soil from the site.    I-
    Projections of potential  emissions  of  HCH were made based on leaving the
 material  on site in its current state.   Theoretical annual'emissions were 1.25
 Kg HCH leached from the deposit through precipitation and 18 g HCH transferred
 through the soil to the atmosphere (based  on a  deposit area of 250 square
 meters).   These emissions  could be Deduced by encapsulating the problem site.-
    A diagram of the Gendorf  encapsulation design is shown  in Figure 31.   The
 following measures were taken (Defrejgger,  1980)  to prevent  migration of the
 HCH residues:

    1)    installation of a water  tigjht  steel sheet piling system around the
          site  (426 meters)  (sheet piling:   LARSEN Profil  Nr.  20,  depth 3  m);
    2)
1
installation of an impermeable synthetic membrane over the site;
    3)   additional protection of thje lining by layers of sand and gravel; and
    4)   fixation with bituminous material and paving asphalt concrete.
The final cover has a slope of 3 perjcent.  The encapsulation was completed at
the end of July 1980.  The effort rejquired about 3 weeks.  Three monitoring
wells were installed to allow for long-term monitoring of groundwater beneath
                                    i          '
the encapsulated area.
    Approximately 250,000 DM ($137,7j25 U.S.) were expended for the contaminant
work and setting up the observation wells (Defregger, 1980).  These costs were
paid by the chemical plant.
                                  .1
                                    281

-------
                                                               0)
                                                               4J
                                                               •H

                                                               01


                                                               IH     .—.
                                                               11     £J

                                                               0     oo
                                                               "O     CM
                                                               C     rH
                                                               0)

                                                               o


                                                               (U     a)

                                                               ^     a
                                                               4-1     Dl
                                                                      01
                                                               I)     J_J
                                                                      01

                                                                      P
                                                               1
                                                               a)


                                                               •8
                                                               01



                                                               0
                                                               •H
                                                               4J
                                                               01
                                                               I
                                                               i-t


                                                               D)
                                                               •H

                                                               fo
0>
U


8
CO
282

-------
Site Reuse
    The site is located on the chemical plant premises  in an  industrial  area.
Because of the encapsulated waste remaining on site, the site has been

designated in the register of land property to prevent  any damage to the .
encapsulation in the future  (Stief, 1984).
Guidelines for Cleanup
    As guidance in the site assessment, the limits for pesticides  (according

to section 26 of the German Water Resources Law) were used.  These limits are
as follows:


       single substance. ......  1,000 X 10~6 mg/L (0.001 ppm)
       Total	2,000 'X 10~6 mg/L (0.002 ppm)
                                    (Defregger, 1980).
                                    283

                                    I

-------
                                 REFERENCES
Birk, F., R. Geiersbach, and R. Muller, 1973.  "The effects of Deposition and
Storage of Cyanide-Containing Hardening Salts in Bochum-Gerthe on the Surface
and Groundwater'.-Z. Dtsch. Geol. Ges., 124, 461-473.  Hannover, 1973.

Braunschweig, W. E., "Experiences Gained With the Root-Zone Sewage Works at
Othfresen,  (Erfahrungen mit der Wurzelraumklaranlage Othfresen)." Presented at
Symposium ,,Grundlagen und Praxis naturnaher Klaverfahren."  Korrespondenz
Abwasser, 32. Jahrgang, 5/85, pp. 372-375.

Coldeway, W.G., 1984.   "Experience With the Covering of Contaminated Land in
the Ruhr Region."  Prepared for NATO/CCMS Meeting, Hamburg, May 20 - June 6,
1984.

Defregger, B. P., 1980.   "Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites  in
Bavaria Illustrated By  Closing an Industrial Waste Chemical Dump."  OECD
Seminar on Hazardous Waste "Problem" Sites, Paris, Nov. 1980,
ENV/WMP/80.Sem.8.

Heide, G. and H. Werner,  1984.   "Process of Safely Disposing of Waste
Materials."  U. S. Patent No.  4,456,400.  June 26, 1984.  Foreign Application
Priority Data: October  21, 1980, Fed. Rep. of Germany, 3039660; November 1,
1980, Fed.  Rep. of Germany, 3044436.

Kikuth, R.,  1971.  Gutachten  zur Einleitung von abwassern der  Gemeinde
Othfresen in den ehemaligen Klarteich  der Grube Ida." Universitat Gottingen,
1971.

Kikuth, R.  1983.   "Jahresberichte zum  ModelIprojekt  Othfresen", Gottingen  1974
-  1977; Kassel  1978  -  1983.

Kloke, A.,  1977.   "Orientierungsdaten  fur tolerierbare Gesamtgehalte  einiger
Elemente  in Kulturboden." Des Verbandes Deutscher Landwirtschaftlicher
Untersuchungs-und  Forschungsanstalten  (VDLUFA), HEFT 2/1977.
 Shuldt,  M.,  1984.   "Remedial Action Programme of Hamburg."
 CCMS Meeting,  Hamburg,  May 30-June 2,  1984.
Presented at NATO
 Stief,  K.,  and V.  Franzius,  1983.   "Abandoned Waste Disposal Sites Problems in
 the Federal Republic of Germany,  Status Report."   Submitted to the OECD Waste
 Management Policy Group, Paris,  April 1983,  and to the NATO/CCMS Pilot Study
 Group on Contaminated Land,  Hamburg,  May 1983, 18 pp.  with 4 appendices.
                                      284

-------
                                    I

Stief, K.,  1984.   "Remedial Action for Groundwater  Protection Case Studies
Within the  Federal Republic of Germany"  In:  Proceedings 5th National
Conference  on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous  Waste Sites,  Washington,
D.C., November  7-9,  1984,  pp. 565-568.

Szelinski,  A.,  1983'.   "Legal Provisions of the Federal  Republic of Germany
Concerning  the  Reclamation of Used Land."  In:  Conference Proceedings,
Reclamation 83, International Land Reclamation Conference and Exhibition,
Grays, Essex, U.D., April  26-29,  1983, pp. 221-229.
                                    285
                                           * U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1992-648-003/40796

-------

-------

-------

                                                               8

                                                               S
                                                               o
                                                               O
m
"U
CD
O
O
mc:
                                                                           •Sii.-
                                                                           3 ^'  =f. o
                                                                           --•§ °
                                                                           Ol
                                                                           ro
   o



   1
   (D
   CO
   CD

-------