Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site


                                                                  V\
PILOT-SCALE INCINERATION OF CONTAMINATED
       SLUDGES FROM THE BOFORS-NOBEL
                   SUPERFUND SITE
                             By

                   C. King and L. R. Waterland
                 Acurex Environmental Corporation
                   Incineration Research Facility
                    Jefferson, Arkansas 72079
                    EPA Contract 68-C9-0038
                      Work Assignment 2-3
                 Project Officer: Robert C. Thurnau
             Technical Project Monitor: Gregory J. Carroll
      Waste Minimization, Destruction, and Disposal Research Division
               Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
                     Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
         RISK REDUCTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY
           OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
          U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                   CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268

-------
                                     NOTICE
       The information in this document has been funded by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency under Contract 68-C9-0038 to Acurex Environmental Corporation. It has
been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review, and it has been approved for
publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                         11

-------
FOREWORD
Today's rapidly developing and changing technologies and industrial products and
practices frequently carry with them the increased generation of materials that, if improperly
dealt with, can threaten both public health and the environment. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency is charged by Congress with protecting the Nation's land, air, and water
resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the agency strives to formulate and
implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of
natural systems to support and nurture life. These laws direct the EPA to perform research to
define our environmental problems, measure the impacts, and search for solutions.

The Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory is responsible for planning, implementing,
and managing research, development, and demonstration programs to provide an authoritative,
defensible, engineering basis in support of the policies, programs, and regulations of the EPA
with respect to drinking water, wastewater, pesticides, toxic substances, solid and hazardous
wastes, and Superfund-related activities. This publication is one of the products of that research
and provides a vital communication link between the researcher- and the user community.

This report describes a series of treatability tests conducted at the EPA's Incineration
Research Facility using contaminated sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund site in
Muskegon, Michigan. Three incineration tests were performed in the facility's pilot-scale rotary
kiln incineration system for each of two sludges. Test results suggest that incineration is an
effective option for the sludges, both of which are contaminated with various organic
contaminants and trace metals.

For further information, please contact the Waste Minimization, Destruction, and
Disposal Research Division of the Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory

-------
ABSTRACT
A detailed test program was performed at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA's) Incineration Research Facility (IRF) to help determine the effectiveness of incineration
in treating two contaminated lagoon sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund site in Muskegon,
Michigan. The sludges tested were contaminated with various organic contaminants and trace
metals. Three incineration tests were conducted for each sludge, for a total of six tests, in the
IRF's pilot-scale rotary kiln incineration system (RKS). Target incineration conditions were held
constant for all six. tests, with a kiln temperature of 982°C (1,80Q°F); kiln exit flue gas O2 at 8
to 10 percent; afterburner temperature of 1,204°C (2,200°F); and afterburner exit flue gas O2
at 6 percent.

The test results suggest that incineration under the conditions tested represents an
effective treatment option for the lagoon 8 sludge. Substantial decontamination of organics from
the sludge was achieved; the principal organic hazardous constituent (POHC) was not detected
in the flue gas; paniculate and HC1 emissions were low and in compliance with the incinerator
performance standards; and incineration residuals (kiln ash and scrubber liquor) would not be
toxicity characteristic (TC) hazardous wastes based on leachable trace metal content.

Incineration also appears to be an effective treatment option for the lagoon 3 sludge:
substantial organic decontamination was achieved; the performance standard of 99.99 percent
POHC destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) was met; and the resulting kiln ash toxicity
characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) leachate had trace metal concentrations below
regulatory limits. A wet scrubber air pollution control system (APCS) of the type tested may
not, however, be an appropriate choice for air pollution control. While HC1 emissions were
acceptable, particulate emissions at the primary APCS exit were greater than those allowed by
the incinerator performance standards. Low cadmium and lead collection efficiencies resulted
in cadmium emission levels in the 153 to 206 /tg/dscm range and lead emission levels in the
4,420 to 4,180 jig/dscm range. In addition, the unfiltered scrubber liquor discharge exceeded the
TCLP limits for lead and approached the limit for cadmium (scrubber liquor filtrate
concentrations may be below these limits). If a wet scrubber APCS is used, incineration at a kiln
temperature lower than the 982°C (1,800°F) temperature tested might be warranted. A lower
kiln temperature would likely reduce the amount of cadmium and lead volatilized and carried
out of the kiln in the combustion gas.

This report was submitted in fulfillment of Contract 68-C9-0038 by Acurex
Environmental Corporation under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
This report covers work conducted during October and November 1991.
IV

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section                                                               Page

          NOTICE	  ii
          FOREWORD  	iii
          ABSTRACT 	iv
          LIST OF HLUSTRATIONS	  viii
          LIST OF TABLES	ix

  1        INTRODUCTION	 .	   1
                  *                       '
  2        FACILITY DESCRIPTION, WASTE DESCRIPTION, AND TEST
          CONDITIONS  . . .'.	   3

          2.1     ROTARY KILN INCINERATION SYSTEM
                 DESCRIPTION	   3
                             *

          2.1.1    Incinerator Characteristics	   3
          2.1.2    Air Pollution Control System	   3

          2.2  .   TEST WASTE DESCRIPTION . .	   6
          2.3     TEST CONDITIONS	   8

  3        SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS	   18

          3.1     SAMPLING	   18
          3.2     ANALYSIS . . . .	   24

  SECTION 4      TEST RESULTS	   28

          4.1     PROXIMATE AND ULTIMATE ANALYSIS RESULTS  .....   28
          4.2     VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS
                 RESULTS	".	   30

          4.2.1    Lagoon 3 Sludge Tests	   30
          4.2.2    Lagoon 8 Sludge Tests	  34

          4.3     SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS
                 RESULTS 	  35
          4.4     POHC DREs	  38

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)


Section

          4.5     TRACE METAL ANALYSIS RESULTS 	 41

          4.5.1    Trace Metal Concentrations in Test Program Samples	 41
          4.5.2    Trace Metal Distributions	 46

          4.6     PARTICULATE AND HC1 EMISSIONS DATA  	 51

       '   4.6.1    Particulate Load	 52
          4.6.2    HC1 Emissions		 53
          4.6.3 "  Particle Size Distributions	 53

  5       CONCLUSIONS	:	 59

  6       QUALITY ASSURANCE	 .	  63

          6.1     VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT ANALYSES	  68
          6.2     SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT ANALYSES	 76
          6.3     TRACE METAL ANALYSES	 91
          6.4     FLUE GAS HC1 ANALYSES	 97

          REFERENCES			   102

          APPENDIX A-^NCINERATOR OPERATING DATA	   104

          APPENDIX A-1-CONTROL ROOM DATA	   105
          APPENDIX A-2-GAS TRAIN DATA	   120
          APPENDIX A-3-rAIR POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM DATA  	   135
          APPENDIX A-4-CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITOR DATA	...   143

          APPENDIX B-OPERATING DATA PLOTS	   151

          APPENDIX B-l-KILN AND AFTERBURNER OPERATION  	   152
          APPENDIX B-2—SCRUBBER EXIT AND STACK CONTINUOUS
                       EMISSION MONITORS	   160

-------
                    TABLE OF CONTENTS (concluded)


Section                                                          Page

         APPENDIX C-LABORATORY ANALYSIS DATA	  '175

         APPENDIX C-1-PROXIMATE, ULTIMATE, AND ASH FUSION
                      TEMPERATURE ANALYSES	   180
         APPENDIX C-2—VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSES	   186
         APPENDIX C-3-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSES	   245
         APPENDIX C-4—TRACE METAL ANALYSES	   290
         APPENDIX C-5-CHLORIDE ANALYSES	   303

         APPENDIX D-SAMPLING TRAIN WORKSHEETS	   307

         APPENDIX D-l—METHOD 5 WORKSHEETS 	   308
         APPENDIX D-2-METHOD 0010 TRAIN WORKSHEETS	   338
         APPENDIX D-3-MULTIPLE METALS TRAIN WORKSHEETS	   351
         APPENDIX D-4-CASCADE IMPACTOR TRAIN WORKSHEETS 	   358

         APPENDIX E-METALS DISTRIBUTIONS WORKSHEETS  	   365
                                Vll

-------
                              LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS


Figure                                                                          Page

   1       Schematic of the IRF rotary kiln incineration system	."	   4

   2       Sampling matrix.	   19

   3       Generalized CEM gas flow schematic	   23

   4       Scrubber inlet and outlet flue gas particle size distributions for the lagoon 3
          sludge tests	  57

 " 5       Scrubber inlet and outlet flue gas particle size distributions for the lagoon 8
          sludge tests	  57
                                         vui

-------
                                   LIST OF TABLES


Table                                                                             Page

  1       Design characteristics of the IRF rotary kiln incineration system	   5

  2       Contamination and characteristics of the lagoon sludge at the Bofors-Nobel
          site	 7

  3       Target incinerator system operating conditions for Bofors-Nobel	 9

  4       Incinerator system operating parameters recorded	  10

  5       Kiln operating conditions	.•	  11

  6       Afterburner operating conditions	  12

  7       Air pollution control system operating conditions	  14

  8       Continuous emission monitor data	.-....'	  15

  9       Target versus actual operating conditions	  16

  10      Sampling and analysis matrix summary for the Bofors site sludge
          incineration tests  	   20

  11      Continuous emission monitors used in the tests	   22

  12      Trace  metals determined in test samples   	   24

  13      Target compound list constituents determined in Method 8270 analyses	  26

  14      Target analytes for the volatile organic constituent analyses	  27

  15      Sludge feed proximate and ultimate analysis results	   29

  16      Sludge feed and ash collected	   29

  17      Composite ash characteristics	   30

  18      Volatile organic constituents in  the lagoon 3 sludge	   32
                                          IX

-------
                             LIST OF TABLES (continued)
Table



  19      Volatile organic constituent PQLs	   32



  20      Volatile organic constituent analysis results for the lagoon 3 sludge tests	   33




  21      Volatile organic constituent analysis results for the lagoon 8 sludge tests	  36




  22      Semivolatile organic constituents in the lagoon 3 sludge	  37




  23      Semivolatile organic constituent PQLs	  37




  24      Candidate trial burn POHCs in the lagoon 3 sludge	  39




  25      POHCDREs	  40



  26      Trace metals in the lagoon 3 sludge	•	  41



  27      Trace metals analysis  results for the lagoon 3 sludge tests  	  43




  28      Trace metals analysis  results for the lagoon 8 sludge tests  	  45




  29      Fractional teachabilities by the TCLP	  47




  30      Trace metal distributions	•	• •	  48




  31      Normalized trace metal distributions  	•	  50




  32      Apparent scrubber collection efficiencies	  51




  33      Flue gas particulate levels	•	  52




  34      Flue gas HC1 levels .	  54



  35      Afterburner exit particle size distributions  	•  55




  36      Scrubber exit particle size distributions	  56




  37      Kiln exit gas O2 monitor calibration  data	;	  64

-------
LIST OF TABLES (continued)

Table Page

38 Afterburner exit gas O2 monitor calibration data 64

39 Scrubber exit gas O2 monitor calibration data 65

40 Stack gas O2 monitor calibration data 65

41 Scrubber exit gas CO2 monitor calibration data 66

42 Stack gas CO2 monitor calibration data 66

43 Scrubber exit gas CO monitor calibration data : . . . 67

44 Stack gas CO monitor calibration data 67

45 Scrubber exit gas NO2 monitor calibration data 68

46 Volatile organic sludge feed, kiln ash, and scrubber liquor sample analysis hold
times 69

47 Method 0030 train sample analysis hold times 70

48 Volatile organic constituent concentrations in Method 0030 train blank
samples 72

49 Volatile organic constituent measurement DQOs 74

50 Volatile organic constituent measurement PQLs: objectives and achieved ... 74

51 Volatile organic constituent recoveries from matrix spike sludge feed,
kiln ash, and scrubber liquor samples 75

52 Volatile organic constituent recoveries from matrix spike Method 0030
samples 76

53 Volatile organic surrogate recoveries from sludge, kiln ash, and scrubber
liquor samples .,. .' 77

54 Volatile organic surrogate recoveries from Method 0030 samples r. . . 78

-------
LIST OF TABLES (continued)
Table
55
56
57
58

59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67

68
69
70

Volatile organic analysis precision from duplicate sample analyses .......
Semivolatile organic test sample analysis hold times 	 	
Semivolatile organic constituent measurement DQOs 	 ,
Semivolatile organic constituent measurement PQLs: objectives and
achieved 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Semivolatile organic constituent recoveries from matrix spike samples
Semivolatile organic surrogate recoveries from test samples 	 '....,
Semivolatile organic analysis precision from duplicate sample analysis
Trace metal test sample analysis hold times 	
Trace metal analyses of method blank samples 	
Trace metal measurement DQOs 	 	 	
Trace metal measurement MDLs: objectives and achieved 	
Trace metal analysis precision from duplicate sample analyses . 	 	
s
Trace metal analysis accuracy and precision from MS/MSD sample
analyses 	
Flue gas HC1 train sample analysis hold times 	 	 	
HC1 measurement DQOs 	 , 	
Chloride recoveries from matrix spike samples 	
Page}^
81
82
84

85
87
88
90
92
94
95
96
98

99
100
101
. . . 101
            Xll

-------
SECTION 1

INTRODUCTION
One of the primary missions of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's)
Incineration Research Facility (IRF), located in Jefferson, Arkansas, is to support Regional
Offices in evaluations of incineration as a treatment option for contaminated soils and sludges
at Superfund sites. One priority site in Region V is the Bofors-Nobel site in Muskegon,
Michigan. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) requested that test burns be conducted
at the IRF to support evaluations of incineration as a treatment technology for the contaminated
sludges at the site. The site Remedial Investigation1'2, Feasibility Study3 and Record of
Decision4 documents, complemented by discussions with USAGE and its support contractor's
staff, were used to establish the site remediation information needs addressed in the subject test
program.

The Bofors site was included as a Superfund site on the National Priority List (NPL)
in March 1989. Since that time, remedial investigation and feasibility studies (RI/FS) have been
conducted to characterize the contaminants and the extent of contamination at the site, and to
identify potential remedial treatment approaches.

According to the September 1990 Record of Decision (ROD), the EPA identified and
defined two operable units at the Bofors site. The Lagoon Operable Unit (L.O.U.) consists of
10 potential source areas. The Groundwater and Plant Operable Unit (GW/PA O.U.)
constitutes the other operable unit. The tests performed at the IRF used materials found in the
L.O.U. only.

Source area sludges are contaminated with several volatile and semivolatile organic
contaminants, chiefly methylene chloride, chloroform, benzene, toluene, azobenzene, benzidine,
and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine. The sludges are also contaminated with several trace metal
contaminants, chiefly barium, cadmium, chromium, and lead. The purpose of the test program
was to evaluate the incinerability of selected site sludges in terms of the destruction of organic
contaminants and the fate of contaminant trace metals. The specific test objectives addressed-
the following questions:

• Can incineration effectively destroy the contaminant principal organic hazardous
constituents (POHCs) to the required destruction and removal efficiency (DRE)
of 99.99 percent?

• Are treated sludges (kiln ash) free of organic contamination?

• What are the nature and concentrations of any organic contaminants in the
discharge from a wet scrubber air pollution control system (APCS)?

-------
        •    What is the distribution of the contaminant trace metals among the incineration
             system discharge streams?

        «    What is the effectiveness of the IRF APCS in collecting participate and trace
             metals?

        This test program investigated the treatability of sludges from two of the five lagoons.
The selection of the two lagoon sludges was made based on bench-scale tests performed by the
USAGE support contractor.  Three incineration tests, under similar incinerator operating
conditions, were performed for each of the two sludges.  All of the tests were performed in the
IRF's pilot-scale rotary kiln incineration system (RKS), equipped with a venturi/packed-column
scrubber APCS.

        This report documents the findings of the test program.  Section 2 describes the RKS
and the characteristics of the sludges tested, and summarizes the RKS operating conditions for
the tests. Section 3 outlines the sampling and analysis procedures employed. Section 4 presents
incineration test results.  Section 5 summarizes test program conclusions. Section 6 discusses the
quality  assurance (QA) aspects of the test program.  Finally, the appendices provide the
complete set of test program supporting data.

-------
SECTION 2

FACILITY DESCRIPTION, WASTE DESCRIPTION, AND TEST CONDITIONS

A description of the RKS is presented in Section 2.1. Section 2.2 describes the
composition and characteristics of the sludges as reported in earlier site remedial investigation
reports. The test matrix and incinerator operating conditions are discussed in Section 2.3.

2.1 ROTARY KILN INCINERATION SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

A process schematic of the RKS is shown in Figure 1 and the system design
characteristics are listed in Table 1. The RKS consists of a rotary kiln primary combustion
chamber, a transition section, and a fired afterburner chamber. After exiting the afterburner,
flue gas flows through a quench section followed by a primary APCS. As noted in Section 1, the
primary APCS for these tests consisted of the venturi/packed-column scrubber. Downstream
of the primary APCS, a backup secondary APCS, comprised of a demister, an activated-carbon
adsorber, and a high-efficiency paniculate (HEPA) filter, is in place. The backup APCS is
designed to ensure that organic compound and particulate emissions to the atmosphere are
negligible. The main components of the RKS and its APCS are discussed in more detail in the
following subsections.

2.1.1 Incinerator Characteristics

The rotary kiln combustion chamber has an inside diameter of 1.0 m (39-in) and is
2.49 m (8 ft 2 in) long. The chamber is lined with refractory formed into a frustroconical shape
to an average thickness of 18.7 cm (7.375 in). The refractory is encased in a 0.95-cm (0.375-in)
thick steel shell. Total volume of the kiln chamber, including the transition section, is 1.90 nr
(67.3 ft3). Four steel rollers support the kiln barrel. A variable-speed DC-motor coupled to a
reducing gear transmission turns the kiln. Rotation speeds can be varied from 0.2 to 1.5 rpm.

The afterburner chamber has a 0.91-m (3-ft) inside diameter, and is 3.05 m (10 ft) long.
The afterburner chamber wall is constructed of a 15.2-cm (6-in) thick layer of refractory encased
in a 0.63-cm (0.25-in) thick carbon steel shell. The volume of the afterburner chamber is 1.80 m3
(63.6ft3).

2.1.2 Air Pollution Control System

For this test program, the primary APCS consisted of a venturi scrubber followed by a
packed-column scrubber in place on the RKS. The flue gas exiting the afterburner passes
through a refractory-lined transfer section and enters the quench section, where the flue gas
temperature is reduced to approximately 82°C (180°F) by direct injection of aqueous caustic
scrubber liquor. The cooled flue gas then enters the venturi scrubber, which is fitted with an

-------
06-/90 QS3
                                                                                         I

-------
 TABLE 1. DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE IRF ROTARY KILN INCINERATION
            SYSTEM

Characteristics of the Kiln Main Chamber
Length
Diameter, outside
Diameter, inside
Chamber-volume
Construction
.Refractory

Rotation
Solids retention time
Burner

Primary fuel
Feed system:
  Liquids
  Sludges
  Solids '
Temperature (max)
2.49 m (8 ft-2 in)
137 m (4 ft-6 in)
Nominal 1.00 m (3 ft-3.5 in)
1.90 m3 (673 ft3)
0.95 cm (0375 in) thick cold-rolled steel
18.7 cm (7375 in) thick high alumina castable refractory, variable depth to produce
a frustroconical effect for moving solids
Clockwise or counterclockwise, 0.2 to 1.5 rpm
1 hr (at 0.2 rpm)
North American burner rated at 590 kW (2.0 MMBtu/hr) with liquid feed
capability
Natural gas

Positive displacement pump via water-cooled lance
Moyno pump via front face, water-cooled lance
Metered twin-auger screw feeder or fiberpack ram feeder
1,010°C (1,850°F)	
Characteristics of the Afterburner Chamber
Length
Diameter, outside
Diameter, inside
Chamber volume
Construction
Refractory
Gas residence time
Burner

Primary fuel
3.05 m (10 ft)
1.22 m (4 ft)
0.91 m (3 ft)
1.80 m3 (63.6 ft3)
0.63 .cm (0.25 in) thick cold-rolled steel
15.2 cm (6 in) thick high alumina castable refractory
1.2 to 2.5 s depending on temperature and excess air
North American Burner rated at 590 kW (2.0 MMBtu/hr) with liquid feed
capability
Natural gas
Temperature (max)    1.200°C (2,200°F)
Characteristics of the Afterburner Extension
Length, with
  transition sections
Diameter, outside
Diameter, inside
Chamber volume
Construction
Refractory
Temperature (max)    1,200°C (2,200°F)
4.43 m (14 ft-6.5 in)
0.915 m (3 ft)
0.61 m (2 ft)
1.19 m3 (41.9 ft3)
0.63 cm (0.25 in) thick cold-rolled steel
15.2 cm (6 in) thick high alumina castable refractory
Characteristics of the Ionizing Wet Scrubber APCS
System capacity,
inlet gas flow
Pressure drop
Liquid flow
pH control
85 m3/min (3,000 acfm) at 78°C (172°F) and 101 kPa (14.7 psia)

15 kPa (6 in WC)
230 L/min (60 gpm) at 345 kPa (50 psig)
Feedback control by NaOH solution addition
                                                                                   (continued)

-------
TABLE 1. (continued)
Characteristics of the Venturi/Packed-Column Scrubber APCS
System capacity, 107 m3/min (3,773 acfin) at 1,200°C (2,200°F) and 101 kPa (14.7 psia)
inlet gas flow
Pressure Drop
Venturi scrubber 7.5 kPa (30 in WC)
Packed column 1.0 kPa (4 in WC)
Liquid flow
Venturi scrubber 77.2 L/min (20.4 gpm) at 60 kPa (10 psig)
Packed column 116 L/min (30.6 gpm) at 69 kPa (10 psig)
pH control Feedback control by NaOH solution addition
automatically adjustable area throat. The scrubber is designed to operate at 6.2 kPa (25 in WC)
differential pressure, with a maximum liquor flowrate of 77.2 L/min (20.4 gpm). The scrubber
liquor, again an aqueous caustic solution, enters at the top of the scrubber and contacts the flue
gas to remove entrained particulates and, to some degree, acid gases.

Downstream of the venturi scrubber, the flue gas enters the packed-column scrubber,
where additional acid gas and particulate cleanup occurs. The scrubber column is packed with
5.1-cm (2-in) diameter polypropylene ballast saddles to a depth of 2.1 m (82 in). It is designed
to operate at 1.0 kPa (4 in WG) differential pressure, with a maximum liquor flowrate of
116 L/min (30.6 gpm).

The quench, venturi scrubber, and packed-column scrubbers receive their scrubber liquor
from the same recirculation system. This liquor is a dilute NaOH aqueous solution, the pH of
which is monitored continuously by a pH sensor. An integral pH controller automatically meters
the amount of NaOH needed to maintain the set point pH for proper acid gas removal.

At the exit of the packed-column scrubber, a demister removes the bulk of the
suspended liquid droplets. In a typical commercial incinerator system, the flue gas would be
vented to the atmosphere downstream of this unit. However, at the IRF, a backup APCS is in
place to further clean up the flue gas. The flue gas exiting the demister is passed through a bed
of activated carbon, to allow the vapor-phase organic compounds to be adsorbed. A set of
HEPA filters designed to remove suspended particulate from the flue gas is located downstream
of the carbon bed. An induced draft fan draws and vents the treated effluent gas to the
atmosphere.

22 TEST WASTE DESCRIPTION

The contaminant characteristics of the five lagoon sludges which were candidates for
testing are summarized in Table 2, which contains data excerpted from the RI/FS documents.
As indicated, the sludges in the five lagoons of interest are contaminated to varying degrees by
several volatile and semivolatile organic compounds. The ROD identified six principal organic
contaminants of concern from the baseline risk assessment. These contaminants, and the
maximum levels measured during the RI, were methylene chloride, present at concentrations up
to 2 mg/kg; benzene, up to 980 mg/kg; 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine, up to 11,000 mg/kg; aniline, up

-------
TABLE 2. CONTAMINATION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LAGOON SLUDGE AT
        THE BOFORS-NOBEL SITE1
TCLP
leachate
concentration
Contaminant limit, mg/L
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7
Acetone
Benzene 0.5
2-Butanone
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Xylene (o, m, p)
2-Chloroaniline
3-3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Bis(2-chlorophenyl)-diazene-l oxide
.33'-Dichlorobenzidine isomers
p-Chlorophenyl)(4-Chlorophenyl)
methanone
Aniline
Azobenzene
Benzidine
Alkylbenzene isomers
Azooxybenzene
l,li,l-Sulfonyl-bis(2-methyl)-Benzene
Antimony
Arsenic " 5
Barium 100
Beryllium
Cadmium . 1
Chromium 5
Lead 5
Mercury 0.2
Selenium 1
Silver 5
% Solids
TOC, % (average)
TOC, % (high)
TOC, % (low)
Corresponding Concentration in sludge from lagoon,
concentration in mg/kg, ppm
100% leached sludge,
mg/kg 3
ND«
14 ND
ND
10 980
ND
ND
11,000
ND
220
830
ND
15,000
260
6,100
ND
12,000
3,400
ND
690
ND
ND
100 6.1
2,000 403
0.67
20 21.9
100 79.5
100 887
4 0.71
20 33
100 ND
50
1.9
4.6
0.4
6
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.2
130
58
22
21
ND
730
1,000
1300
ND
680
70
123
ND
ND
ND
5.1
43.4
2.1
ND
12.1
20.8
ND
ND
ND
50
32
4.8
1.7
8
12
0.68
ND
2.8
ND
ND
80
ND
12
1,500
7.1
0
1,700
26
1.7
33
13
147
ND
ND
ND
3.7
85
ND
ND
68
29.7
ND
ND
ND
49
2.0
3.7
03
9
ND
ND
0.091
0.89
0.025
ND
12
ND
2300
11,000
83
ND
2300
ND
3,900
8,200
1300
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.7
183
ND
15.1
45.7
362
033
ND
ND
56
5.2
12.8 ,
0.1
10
ND
ND
ND
0.008
ND
ND
0.009
ND
24
2,900
ND
ND
3,500
190
1.7
230
13
ND
85
82
ND
033
44.7
2.4
ND
21.2
12.5.
ND
2.4
ND
52
1.4
1.9
1.0
aND = Not detected.

-------
to 3,900 mg/kg; azobenzene, up to 12,000 mg/kg; and benzidine, up to 3,400 mg/kg. Hazardous
metal contaminants were also found to be present. Among these, cadmium and lead were
present at maximum concentrations of 22 and 887 mg/kg, respectively, in some lagoon sludge
samples.

The composition of the treated sludge, air emissions, and air pollution control system
discharge cannot be presumed, nor can the fate of the hazardous constituent trace metals during
incineration. Past experience in incinerating materials contaminated by trace metals offers
guidelines as to how these metals may partition the incineration discharge streams'. However,
actual behavior is case-specific. Moreover, the teachability characteristics of the metals in
treated sludge are unclear. The potential exists for the generation of incineration residues
exhibiting hazardous characteristics. In such cases, additional residue treatment prior to final
land disposal may be required.

The purpose of this test program was to address these data needs. In preparation for
this test program, 15 55-gal drums of sludge were excavated from lagoons 3, 8, 9, and 10 and a
composite of 9 and 10. Four drums of each (20 drums in total) were shipped to the IRF for
possible incineration tests.

The lagoon 3 sludge was a wet, brownish-black clay. The shipment drums received
contained free-standing water covering the material. The lagoon 8 sludge was a dense grey clay
and contained no extraneous materials such as rocks or roots. The lagoon 9 sludge was a
blackish-brown sandy loam mixed with some clay. The lagoon 10 sludge was a grey and
brownish-black chunky clay with some soil mixed in. The composite of the lagoons 9 and 10
sludges was a sandy loam soil with some grey clay. It also contained rocks and roots.

Test quantities of each lagoon sludge were also forwarded to Cross/Tessitore Associates
(CIA) for bench-scale thermal treatability studies. Based on the results of the bench-scale
thermal treatability studies and other considerations, USAGE selected two lagoon sludges, one
from lagoon 3 and one from lagoon 8, to undergo pilot-scale incinerability testing at the IRF.

23 TEST CONDITIONS

Three tests were performed at similar incinerator operating conditions for each lagoon
sludge selected (6 tests total). The target operating conditions are summarized in Table 3.

The six tests were conducted from October 24 through November 7, 1991. Test sludges
were fed to the kiln via the fiberpack drum ram feeder system. This system batch feeds L5-gal
fiberpack drums to the kiln. Each fiberpack drum was packaged to contain nominally 4.6 kg
(10 Ib) of sludge. During each test one fiberpack was charged into the kiln every 5 min, resulting
in target sludge feedrates of nominally 55 kg/hr (120 Ib/hr).

For the lagoon 3 sludge tests, the contents of individual 55-gal drums were transferred
directly into fiberpacks for testing. Each lagoon 3 test incinerated sludge from nominally one
excavated drum. However, for the lagoon 8 sludge tests, the contents of all four drums received
for testing were emptied into a trough, and mixed with a hoe prior to transferring the sludge into
the fiberpacks. Thus, all three lagoon 8 tests incinerated similar, composited material.
- 8

-------
TABLE 3. TARGET INCINERATOR SYSTEM OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR
BOFORS-NOBEL
Total sludge feedrate:
Kiln exit gas temperature
Kiln exit flue gas O2
Afterburner exit gas temperature
Afterburner exit flue gas O2
Kiln rotation speed
Estimated soils residence time
Venturi scrubber liquor flowrate
Venturi scrubber pressure drop
Packed-column scrubber liquor flowrate
Scrubber liquor temperature
Scrubber blowdown rate
54 kg/hr (120 Ib/hr)
982°C (1,800°F)
10%
1,204°C (2,200°F)
7%
0.2 rpm
45 to 60 min
76 L/min (20 gpm)
6.2 kPa (25 in WC)
115 L/min (30 pgm)
49°C (120°F)
0 L/min (0 gpm) or minimum operable
Throughout the test program, the incinerator operating parameters noted in Table 4
were recorded at intervals no longer than once every 15 min. Kiln ash was continuously removed
from the ash pit via an ash transfer auger system and deposited in a 55-gal drum. The ash pit
solids temperature noted in Table 4 was measured with a thermocouple inserted into the ash in
the ash pit. Measurement of the kiln solids bed temperature at about the kiln midpoint was
attempted by inserting a thermocouple through the kiln end plate at the ash pit end, and
extending it into the solids bed. However, this thermocouple broke early in Test 1 and was not
replaced. Thus, no solids bed midpoint temperature data were obtained.
After the completion of flue gas sampling for each test, sludge feed was stopped. The
incinerator continued to be fired with natural gas for a period of 2 hr or until the kiln was
visually clear of ash, whichever period was longer. After this period, the scrubber system was
drained to a scrubber liquor collection tank. The scrubber system was then recharged with fresh
makeup and the incinerator system either turned off (over weekend periods), or operated
overnight firing natural gas to produce steady-state conditions for the next planned test.
Tables 5 and 6 summarize the actual kiln and afterburner operating conditions achieved
for each test, respectively. Average kiln exit gas temperatures ranged from 976 to 1,007°C (1,788
to 1,844 °F) among the tests, while afterburner exit gas temperatures for all tests were maintained
at 1,208°C (2,207°F). Average flue gas oxygen levels at the kiln exit ranged from 8.1 to
10.3 percent. Average measured afterburner exit oxygen levels ranged from 4.7 to 6.1 percent,

-------
TABLE 4. INCINERATOR SYSTEM OPERATING
          PARAMETERS RECORDED

     Temperature
      Rotary kiln midpoint gas
      Rotary kiln exit gas
      Afterburner exit gas
      Scrubber exit gas
      Stack gas
      Ash pit solids
      Recalculating scrubber liquor
      Scrubber blowdown liquor (if any)

     Flowrates
      Rotary kiln natural gas feed
      Afterburner natural gas feed
      Rotary kiln combustion air
      Afterburner combustion air
      Stack combustion flue gas
      Venturi scrubber liquor
      Packed tower scrubber liquor
      Scrubber blowdown liquor
      Scrubber makeup liquor

     Pressures
      Rotary kiln chamber
      Afterburner chamber
      Venturi scrubber AP
      Packed tower scrubber AP

     Other
      Scrubber liquor" pH
      Cumulative sludge weight fed
      Cumulative ash discharged weight
      Rotary kiln rotation speed
                     10

-------
i
o
z
g
3
B3

IS
    >=§
               VO    ON
                                     3-5
                           352-  ^5
                                                                   °j ^   ^i
                                                                   -H -H   CS S
            t  §

                                                    a
                                    oooq_
           ^.O '"I   O *

          <*} T-( ^t1 TH   W V

          fO >- 'CO •— '   <-l



                                       >
                                    !>• ,_! CO ^— i
                                    ON s— ^O\ N™*'
                                    Vgr-T


                                    2-.A
                                             OOCN
                                             ON
                                             f>OO
                                                   .S   Si  S
                                    Srj-T
                                    ON
S
             v
             "
                          is
                                      s
D-oo "-  n •
                                      5?
                                    ti°i-
                                                             ll  a!
                                                          3




                                                         I
                 a

                 B
                 O
                 i
                 i
                                                                 §
                         11   2
                                                 I    f
                                                                 e   s
                                                                     II
                                                                     -s
                         *
tc  I
*• e  8
*J (B  >
X«  <
w
Average
                                                                 111
                                                                 a   IS *•
£
I
                           S aT .§

                             IS
S

                                         11

-------
•a
          S
                              ^
                              c\

                    3.    2-32-d;
                                       >/•> vo    «•*
                                                         r-

                                                         0
                            *  ot
                            SP oo
                            ^ *H
                                             §
                                                         r-

                                                         O
                      §     3
                    si


                            S-SS-S
-

                      ^H
                      o\
                                        S      «o S-
                                        <= «*:    °i §§
                                        P4 TT    i-H 
-------
with the exception of Test 2. During this test the afterburner exit CEM system sampling line
progressively clogged with participate, leading to eventual pump failure. The afterburner exit
O2 monitor was, thus, offline for much of Test 2.  Its readings were suspect during the period
it was online prior to pump failure.

       The calculated combustion gas residence times noted in Table 6 were calculated from
the standard combustion gas flowrates noted in the table, the combustor volumes noted in
Table 1, and the combustion gas temperatures.  The afterburner exit temperature is given in
Table 6; the afterburner extension exit gas temperature appears in the sampling train data sheets
in Appendix D-l. The standard combustion gas flowrates noted in Table 6 are the average of
the flowrates measured by the afterburner exit Method 5 and Method 0010 sampling train
velocity traverses noted in the sampling train data sheets in Appendix D-l (Method 5) and D-2
(Method 0010).

       Table 7  summarizes the operating conditions of the venturi/packed-column scrubber
system.  The  quench chamber received quench  liquor  at about  83  L/min (22 gpm) and
maintained the gas temperature at its exit (scrubber inlet) at about 77°C (170°F).  The venturi
scrubber was operated at its nominal design settings, with pressure drop maintained at about
6 kPa  (24 in WC).  Scrubber  liquor flow  to the venturi and packed-column scrubbers was
maintained  at the nominal design  rates of 76 L/min (20 gpm) and  114 L/min (30 gpm),
respectively.  The heat exchanger system was used to remove heat from the recirculating
scrubber liquor and maintain the liquor temperature at about 66°C (150°F).

        Continuous emission monitor  (CEM) data from the nine monitors used to measure
combustion gas composition at four locations in the RKS are summarized in Table 8.

       The ranges and averages of the temperature, CEM, and scrubber pH data presented in
Tables 5 through 8 were developed for the periods  of flue gas sampling, using the data
automatically recorded by a personal-computer (PC)-based data acquisition system. The values
given for the remaining parameters were derived from the control room log book  data.

       Transcribed operating parameter data from the control room logs, recorded at 15-min
intervals, are given in Appendix A. Appendix B contains graphic presentations of the flue gas
temperatures and emission monitor readings at the kiln and afterburner exits. Appendix B also
contains graphic presentations  of the flue gas emission monitor readings for the scrubber exit
and stack. These data plots are  based on incinerator system conditions recorded at 70-s intervals
on the data acquisition system.  In  addition, durations of the various flue gas sampling periods,
major events, and the cumulative amounts of the waste fed into the incinerator are also included
on these plots.

       Table 9  compares the  target and actual test operating conditions for each test.  As
shown, average kiln temperatures were within 25 °C (44 °F) of target temperatures for all tests.
Kiln exit flue gas O2 levels were within 2 percent of target levels. Afterburner temperature was
within  4°C (7°F) of target for all tests.

       Slag formation  and accumulation in the transfer  duct between the kiln  and the
afterburner was experienced during all tests to some degree. Ash carried  out of the kiln into the
afterburner  passes through the afterburner flame and experiences the  higher-temperature
afterburner environment. Ash  with a low melting point (fusion temperature) becomes molten


                                          13
-------
o
s
i
s
IS
u
2
o
d
cd
52


S
CQ
IS
  w ve
  25.

       s
       S)

          €
I   I


          I

                 §  S

                S s§



                        II
                       Is
              SI  si P!
                                               ff

                 ^



              «
                   I
in

i
    l


                       1
                       I


a
                                        5?
                                   1
                                i
                              |

                              1
                               I
                                        *

                                             4>


                         14
-------
          TABLE 8.  CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITOR DATA
Parameter
Kiln exit
O2 range, %
average, %
Afterburner exit
O2 range, %
average, %
Scrubber exit
O2 range, %
average, %
CO range, ppm •
average, ppm
CO2 range, %
average, %
NOX range, ppm
average, ppm
Stack
O2 range, %
average, %
CO range, ppm
average, ppm
CO2 range, %
average, %
Testl
(10/24/91)

4.8-113
103

2.0-63
4.7

8.0-12.5
9.7
0
0
0.1-8.4
6.7
32-68
52

10.5-12.9
12.1
4-5
5 '
5.4-73
6.1
test 2
(10/29/91)

63-13.1
9.4

9.1-12.88
11.2

6.4-10.0
8.1
0
0
6.6-9.6
7.9
60-100
84

93-12.5
10.9
4-5
4
5.8-8.0
6.9
Test3
(10/31/91)

5.4-12.1
8.1

3.1-8.9
5.7

7.1-9.4
8.2
0
0
7.0-8.9
7.9
59-91
76

10.2-12.0
10.9
3-4
4
63-7.6
6.9
Test 4
(11/5/91)

3.9-10.9
8.1

43-73
5.9

6.5-9.7
8.1
0
0
6.6-8.7
7.5
55-113
87

9.9-12.4
113
3-4
3
5.8-7.4
6.6
Tests
(11/6/91)

83-10.4
9.5

5.1-6.7
6.0

7.8-8.9
83
0
0
7.0-8.0
7.4
85-108
95

11.2-12.2
11.6
3-4
3
6.1-6.9
6.4
Test 6
(11/7/91)

73-11.0
93

5.1-7.1
6.1

5.9-8.6
6.6
3-8
5
6.0-83
7.4
56-84
75

10.0-12.1
10.6
3
3
5.5-7.0
6.5
"Sampling line leak.
                                 15
-------
os
1
i
      3
      s
      2
      i
      i
      «
      §
     s
fa
o

O
o

 2
S
 «


 I
           a
                     0>
                     2?
                 •<
                 m*  0)
                  «  go
                 a  2
                 __  4>

                     2C3
                     h
                     &
                                     V)
                                               o
                                               vd
                                                     VO
                          0    0
                          o    o
                    o    o
                    o    o
                    CM    CM
                    CM"   CM"
                          s    s
                          CM    CM
                                     O

                                     CM"
                                          o
                                               O
                                               
-------
and forms a slag layer on the afterburner walls. As this slag layer builds up, some of the molten
slag can flow down the transition section wall and solidify as it reaches the lower-temperature
regions near the kiln section.  If the buildup of solidifying slag in the transition continues, it can
reduce the cross sectional area  of the transition section enough to measurably increase the
pressure drop in the combustion gas flow. When this occurs, difficulty in maintaining kiln draft
(negative pressure) is experienced. This, in turn, can lead to frequent loss of flame in the kiln
burner.

        Slag  accumulation in the transition duct was most severe in the lagoon 3 sludge  tests,
especially Tests. 1 and 2, during  which loss of kiln burner  flame  was experienced.  Slag
accumulation, though less severe, was also experienced during the lagoon 8 sludge tests. The
transition duct was inspected after each test,  and any accumulated slag was  removed and
combined with the kiln ash collected for the test.

        The ash produced in the lagoon 3 tests was a very fine particulate. As a consequence,
a substantial amount was entrained in the combustion gas. This led to kiln CEM sampling line
filter clogging problems, which were experienced during all three lagoon 3 sludge tests. Higher-
than-typical particulate loadings to the scrubber system were present in these tests as welL

        The  ash produced in the lagoon 8 sludge tests was a coarser particulate.  No CEM
sampling line filter clogging was experienced during Tests 4 through 6.
                                           17
-------
                                     SECTION 3

                              SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS


        The sampling and analysis efforts completed for each test are summarized in Figure 2
and detailed in Table 10. The sampling effort is discussed in Section 3.1, followed in Section 3.2
by a discussion of sample analysis procedures.

3.1     SAMPLING

        For all tests, the sampling protocol to satisfy the test objectives entailed:

        •    Obtaining a composite sample of the sludge for the test

        •    Collecting a composite sample of the kiln ash

        •    Collecting a composite sample of the scrubber liquor

        •    Continuously measuring O2 levels in the kiln exit and afterburner exit flue gases;
             O2, CO, CO2, and NOX levels at the venturi/packed-column scrubber exit; and O2,
             CO, and CO2 levels in the stack

        •    Sampling the flue gas at the afterburner exit and at the scrubber system exit for
             semivolatile organic constituents

        •    Sampling the flue gas at the afterburner exit and at the scrubber system exit for
             volatile organic constituents

        •    Sampling the flue gas at the afterburner exit and at the scrubber system exit for
             particulate size distribution

        •    Sampling the flue gas downstream of the scrubber system for trace metals, using
             the EPA multiple metals train

        •    Sampling the flue gas at the afterburner exit, at the scrubber system exit,  and at
             the stack downstream of the secondary APCS for particulate and HC1, using
             Methods

        During each test, kiln ash was continuously removed from the kiln ash pit via a transfer
auger, as noted in Section 2, and deposited  into  55-gal drum. After all test ash was deposited
in this drum, representative,kiln  ash samples were taken by thief sampling in at least three
                                          18
-------
68-frK) QS3
                         in
                         •9
                         O
                         •o 8 22

                         1*1
                        ]*lf
                         si?
                         Ill
                         5 & EP
                         » a> a
                         S5S

                         111
                         J=i
                         B
                         "•
                            l
                        .» s b ss
                          5-
                          VI
                                        X X
      X
  X
  X
                                        X
                                        X
  X   X
I-
es
            r
XX   XX
    X
                                X
                              X
                       19
-------
en
H
Z
o
1
*3
CM
1
n
ITE SLUDGE IN(
BOFORS S
Ed
S
i^
fA
o
fa
i
i*f^
s
en
H
S
CO
§
s

^E

Z
^
o
Z
|H^
cu
p**j
*^c
en
d

S
f^
•<
H








to
S.
































1

fa





1
i






u
9>
•s
1



i
1
i
l1
C3
W



1
TS
8
2





|

w

I I I 1 .1 1_
to wi cfl w ws w tn wi
o S222222
if If i 1 1 1 1 1

fa 1, •«
— 's, 's.
C8 «" rs
c § §
S ^ ^
a p g g «,
^ S r^ t^
1 1 1 f
1 ||f
r> P So «2 OOOO'§'?H
QDGQ 1111 1 1
< < < < SSSSQ2
M
n
2 S f*

1 .1 ^
^ a 1 §
f -sD | 8 »
t _ S J.«r g1 'I A 1
§g ^e2uS>'3 H

-s|wi2o*'l°| S
2 82.S"o-5JjS «
'a •« S S .§ S -| js 8 j

u
|
U
U



M
C
•c
a
•o
E
5 bo
10 .S
o Eb
*O TV
55 cu


•o
o
(M
s>
•a
53


III

a
"S3
*e3
^
igestion with Method 601
analysis by Method 7060*
analysis by Method 7470*
Method 3010 d
Digestion and ;
Digestion and ;


^^
S
t>
1
4>
Jfl
*«
"5
1 *8















o
"«
1 H
 «> *™^
g 2 S
.a 1 1
S 8 o
I | f |
•53 Er J2 G
1 .1 g «
•s M 8 ,j
I 1 :£3 S £

o
1
^

£
E
e
•o
1
M
S '
1 '
e
2



j:
a
e
2


ts is a
a s ~

sw
'gj»
i
«
0
ligestion with Method 601
analysis by Method 7060"
analysis by Method 7470*
Method 3010 d
Digestion and ;
Digestion and


^^.
S
s>
1 •
i
a
g
8















0,
^
H
J5 ft>
« 5
e o
a J
I
5-

























.
•"
•o
1
s
<
if
vrt *^
IB
K> °
wf *O~
8 8
V 4>
i i
(d U3
-------










^
s
e
1
e

TABLE


























.2
I



























5*
a*
1
£



•e
i





1
s
£

£
-i
8
1

c
ss
g
*


1
CS
J3



J!
n.
5



tfl tfl W t3 to
4) 4) 4) 4) 4>
i 1
1 1
S o
| §16
1 lii
i « * *
I i £ I*
1 1 i i
= % s = "§
£j 55 S a a
c^ oo  SO ^£
S S 1 S 3
«
2
e .
o
22^
In U """
§ — —
'§ 8 a
& .a 1
CO ^
tn ^ ^ «i 3?







o.
e
1
1
1-
1
|
*
o
w
yj

1
1


|| HI
el
CO
C£
* i i
o ^ S
U * w
1 ! I
'i f §
1 1 °
ku e
0 «= n
•o .2 S S S 1
O g, S a O .E
1 1 1 f 1 1
2 
S 5 .5
•L I*
.l°o. J|
1 fl lit


^-^
i
1

o S '
1 i
u U
£ a! ^

^
t>
s
"S.
* 1
2 5<~
5 < e
1- §fi



1
1
*



1
s
£
                         *wa
                         4)
           81.
f I  •-



If  "
^1

-it^
*i s*^  O
                     f

                     •8
                     U9

                     1
8

I
                  .
                         o  -g S

                         i  ti

               2

               g
               3


               I

               .H
        c
        o
        2
                  :1



           ,.
           <
              a, a:
     S
     •g
                     s s
                     •" 175
                           S
                         •BE
                         s^
                         s fe.
                         v5 S
                         1
                              .a
                              •g
                              8,
                                 ui" t-- oo" ov~ S


                                 a § a a g
21
-------
locations across the collection drum cross section. The three ash samples were combined to form
one composite sample.

        As also noted in Section 2, each test was run with the scrubber liquor loop operating at
total recycle (no blowdown).  At the end of each test day, the  scrubber was  drained to a
collection tank. The collection tank was agitated to ensure uniform contents, and a composite
scrubber liquor sample withdrawn for analysis. In addition, a 55-gal drum sample was collected
and stored for possible further treatability studies.

        The flue gas at four locations (kiln  exit, afterburner exit, venturi/packed-column
scrubber exit, and the stack) was continuously monitored for location-specific combinations of
O2, CO, CO2, and NOX.  The OEMs used and the locations monitored during these tests are
summarized in Table 11.  This monitoring arrangement was employed in all tests.

        Figure 3 illustrates the generalized flue gas conditioning and flow distribution system at
the IRF. Four independent systems, such as the one illustrated in Figure 3, are in place so that


        TABLE 11. CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORS USED IN THE TESTS
Monitor
Location
Kiln exit
Afterburner exit
Scrubber exit


Constituent
02
02
02
CO
CO2
Manufacturer
Beckman
Beckman
Teledyne
Horiba
Horiba
Model Principle
755 Paramagnetic
755 Paramagnetic
326A Fuel cell
VIA 500 NDIR
PIR2000 NDIR
Range
0-10 percent
0-25 percent
0-100 percent
0-10 percent
0-25 percent
0-100 percent
0-5 percent
0-10 percent
0-25 percent
0-50 ppm
0-500 ppm
0-20 percent
0-80 percent
                 NO,
Thermo Electron  10 AR
Chemiluminescent 0-75 ppm to
                0-10,000 ppm in
                multiples of 2
Stack O2
CO
CO2
Teledyne
Horiba
Horiba
326A
VIA 500
PIR2000
Fuel cell
NDIR
NDIR
0-5 percent
0-10 percent
0-25 percent
0-50 ppm
0-500 ppm
0-20 percent
0-80 percent
                                          22
-------
          r
  HIGH
  BAY
                             FILTER
                                          PUMP
                                                     FILTER
CONTROL
ROOM
                                   SAMPLE
HEATED FLOW
CONTROL UNIT
                                             DISPOSABLE
                                             ABSORPTION
                                             UNITS*
                 HEATED
                 TUHC
                 MONITOR

  Mixed Na and Ca hydroxides for
  acid gas removal
                                                                                       FLOW
                                                                                       CONTROL
                                                                                       UNIT
02
MONITOR
CO       CO2     NO,      UNHEATED
MONITOR  MONITOR MONITOR  TUHC
                          MONITOR


       '          '  HEATED TO
       |_	|  150TO175°C
                     Figure 3.  Generalized CEM gas flow schematic.
                                            23
-------
appropriately conditioned sample gas from four separate locations can be routed to any of the
available monitors listed in Table 11. The CEM setup described in Table 11, with appropriate
ga's conditioning per Figure 3, was employed throughout this test program.  CEM data were
recorded continuously by strip chart recorders and by an automatic data acquisition system.

        Flue gas samples  were collected  at three locations:   the afterburner  exit,  the
venturi/packed-column scrubber exit, and the stack.  The afterburner exit and venturi/packed-
column scrubber exit flue gas sampling supported the test objective of characterizing the flue gas
upstream and downstream of this ARCS.- The stack gas sampling was performed to satisfy IRF
hazardous waste management permit requirements.          v

        Sampling of the flue gas at the afterburner exit, the scrubber exit, and the stack was
conducted in accordance with the standard Method 5 procedures. HC1 (chloride ion) in the
impinger solutions was determined by ion chromatography. Particulate load was determined
gravimetrically.

        Flue gas paniculate particle size distributions were determined at the afterburner exit
and at the scrubber exit using a cascade impactor train (California Air Resources Board [CARS]
Method 5019).  The flue gas particulate matter was classified into several size ranges between
0.3 and 10 /un. Larger particles were caught with an upstream "pre-cutter" cyclone separator.

        The scrubber exit flue gas was also sampled for trace metals, using the EPA multiple
metals train. In this method the first impinger was initially empty.  The second contained 0.1N
NaOH solution for HC1 removal. The third and fourth each contained 5-percent nitric acid and
10-percent hydrogen peroxide. The fifth (last) impinger contained silica gel. After sampling, the
contents of the first, second, third, and fourth  impingers were combined and preserved, if
needed, with HNO3 to pH <2 for trace metal analysis.  This train  sampled for all the  trace
metals listed in Table 12.  Mercury was not included as a sampled metal because a separate
sampling train would have been required and Table 2 shows that site sludges contained only
nondetectable to very low mercury concentrations.

        An EPA Method 0010 train sampled both the afterburner exit and the scrubber exit flue
gas for semivolatile  organic hazardous constituents analysis. Both locations were also sampled
for volatile organic hazardous constituents using EPA Method 0030.

32     ANALYSIS

        The analysis protocols  for each of  the collected samples are noted in Table 10 and
discussed in more detail below.
            TABLE 12.  TRACE METALS DETERMINED IN TEST SAMPLES

                             Antimony      Chromium
                             Barium        Lead
                             Beryllium      Selenium
                             Cadmium      Silver
                                          24
-------
        One composite sludge feed sample for each lagoon location tested (composited from all
drums used as test feed for each sludge) was subjected to proximate (ash, moisture, and heating
value) and ultimate (C, H, O, N, S, Cl) analyses by the ASTM methods noted in Table 10. The
sludge feed sample for each test, and each of the kflh ash and scrubber liquor samples, were
analyzed for  semivolatile and volatile organic hazardous constituents and trace metals.  In
addition, the sludge feed and the kiln ash for each test were subjected to TCLP extraction, and
the resulting leachate analyzed for trace metals.

        Analyses for semivolatile organic hazardous constituents were by EPA  Method 8270.
Aqueous liquid  samples (scrubber  liquor) were continuous liquid/liquid extracted  (EPA
Method 3520) for analysis, and solid samples (sludge feed and kiln ash) and the Method 0010
train samples were Soxhlet extracted (EPA Method 3540). The target analytes to be determined
were  the .four  semivolatile organic  contaminants:   aniline,  azobenzene, benzidine,  and
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine.  However the target compound list (TCL) constituents noted in Table 13
were  also quantitated.  The full five-point initial calibration of the GC/MS instrument was
performed, as specified in Method 8270, for the four target analytes.  However, only a single-
point, low-level calibration standard was run daily for the constituents in Table 13.

        Volatile organic hazardous constituents in sludge feed, kiln ash, and scrubber liquor
samples were analyzed by Method 8240. Method 0030 traps were analyzed by Method 5040,
which incorporates Method 8240 analysis and quantitation. The target analytes were those listed
in Table 14.

        Analyses for  all trace metals  except arsenic  and mercury (those metals  listed in
Table 12) were by inductively coupled argon plasma spectroscopy (ICAP, EPA Method 6010).
Aqueous liquid  samples  (scrubber liquor  and  TCLP leachates)  were  digested  by  EPA
Method 3010. Solid samples (sludge feed and kiln ash) were digested by EPA Method 3050.
Arsenic was determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS, EPA
Method 7060).  Aqueous liquid samples were digested using  the procedure contained in EPA
Method 7060. Solid samples were digested by EPA Method 3050. Mercury was determined in
aqueous liquid  samples by EPA Method 7470 analysis,  and  in solid  samples  by  EPA
Method 7471 analysis.

        The multiple metals train particulate  catch was digested by Method 3050 for metals
analyses. Impinger contents from.this train were combined and digested by Method 3010 for
metals analyses.  Analyses of the digestates for the trace metals listed in Table 12 were by
Method 6010. As noted above, no flue gas mercury analyses  were performed.

        Stack gas particulate load was determined by desiccating the filter and probe wash of
the Method 5 particulate/HCl trains. Particulate loading was determined gravimetrically. Stack
HC1 levels were  determined by analyzing the combined impinger solutions from the Method 5
particulate/HCl  trains for chloride using ion chromatography by EPA Method 300.0.

        The cascade impactor stages from sampling at the afterburner exit and the scrubber exit
were  separated and the appropriate gravimetric analysis performed on each impactor stage,
giving particle size distribution data.
                                          25
-------
TABLE 13. TARGET COMPOUND LIST CONSTITUENTS DETERMINED IN
           METHOD 8270 ANALYSES
    Base/Neutrals
     Acenaphthene
     Acenaphthylene
     Anthracene
     Benzo(a)anthracene
     Benzo(b)fluoranthene
     Benzo(k)fluoranthene
     Benzo(a)pyrene
     Benzo(ghi)perylene
     Benzyl butyl phthalate
     Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
     Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
     Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
     Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
     4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
     4-Chloroaniline
     2-Chloronaphthalene
     4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
     Chrysene
     Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
     Dibenzofuran
     Di-n-butyl phthalate
     1,2-Dichlorobenzene
     1,3-Dichlorobenzene
     1,4-Dichlorobenzene
     Diethyl phthalate
     Dimethyl phthalate
     2,4-Dinitrotoluene
     2,6-Dinitfotoluene
     Di-n-octylphthalate
     Fluoranthene
     Fluorene
 Hexachlorobenzene
 Hexachlorobutadiene
 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
 Hexachloroethane
 Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene
 Isophorone
 2-Methylnaphthalene
 Naphthalene
 2-Nitroaniline
 3-Nitroaniline
 4-Nitroaniline
 Nitrobenzene
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
 Phenanthrene
 Pyrene
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Acids
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
 2-Chlorophenol
 2,4-Dichlorophenol
 2,4-Dimethylphenol
 2,4-Dinitrophenol
 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
 2rMethylphenol
 4-Methylphenol
 2-Nitrophenol
 4=Nitrophenol
 Pentachlorophenol
 Phenol
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
                                   26
-------
TABLE 14. TARGET ANALYTES FOR THE VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT
           ANALYSES
             Acetone
             Benzene
             Bromodichloromethane
             Bromoform
             Bromomethane
            . Carbon tetrachloride
             Chlorobenzene
             Chloroethane
             2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
             Chloroform
             Chloromethane
             Dibromochloromethane
             1,2-Dichlorobenzene
             1,3-Dichlorobenzene
             1,4-Dichlorobenzene
             1,1-Dichloroethane
             1,2-Dichloroethane
 1,1-Dichloroethene
 trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
 1,2-Dichloropropane
 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
 Ethyl benzene
 Methylene chloride
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
 Tetrachloroethene
 Toluene
 1,1.1-Trichloroethane
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
 Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
 Vinyl chloride
Total xylenes
                                    27
-------
                                      SECTION 4

                                    TEST RESULTS
        The results of the test program are discussed in this section. Test results are grouped
by analyte class.  Thus, Section 4.1 presents the sludge feed proximate and ultimate analysis
results.   Section 4.2 discusses the volatile organic constituent measurements,  including the
effectiveness of incineration  in removing volatile organic contaminants from the  sludge.
Section 4.3  discusses  the semivolatile  organic  constituent  measurements,  including  the
effectiveness of incineration in removing semivolatile organic contaminants from the sludge.
Section 4.4 discusses the POHC selection and the DREs obtained for the POHCs of both lagoon
sludges.  Section 4.5 discusses the trace metal measurements, including the  distributions of
contaminant metals among the incinerator discharge streams.  Finally, Section  4.6 presents the
results of the flue gas paniculate, HC1, and particle size distribution measurements.

4.1     PROXIMATE AND ULTIMATE ANALYSIS RESULTS

        The proximate and ultimate analysis results for the composite sludge samples analyzed
are presented in Table 15 (analytical reports are provided in Appendix C-l).  As shown in
Table 15, both test sludges had relatively  high moisture and volatile matter contents.  The
lagoon 3 sludge had higher carbon and hydrogen contents on a dry basis. Despite this, both
sludges had comparable heating values of about 5,350 Btu/lb.  The lagoon 3 sludge contained
3.5 percent chlorine, 3.7 percent sulfur, and 2.2 percent nitrogen on a dry basis.  The lagoon 8
sludge had negligible chlorine and nitrogen contents, each at or below 0.1 percent on a dry basis;
however, its sulfur content was significantly higher, at 12.7 percent on a dry basis, than that of
the lagoon 3 sludge.   Despite the higher nitrogen content of the lagoon 3  sludge, average
scrubber exit NOX levels for Tests 1 through 3 with the lagoon 3 sludge, at 64 to 87 ppm at
7 percent O2, were not significantly different (in fact, slightly lower) than those for Tests 4
through 6 with the lagoon 8 sludge, at 74 to 111 ppm at 7 percent O2, as shown in Table 8.

        Table 16 summarizes the  cumulative weight of sludge fed  for each test and the total
amount of kiln ash collected. As  indicated in the table, about 20 percent (by weight) of the
lagoon 3 sludge fed in Tests 1 through 3 was collected as kiln  ash. The corresponding fraction
for Tests 4 through 6 with the lagoon 8 sludge was about 40 percent.  These fractions agree quite
well with the ash contents of the sludges obtained by proximate analysis, as shown in Table 15.

        Table  17 notes the bulk density and ash fusion temperatures of composite kiln ash
samples resulting from the incineration of both sludges tested (analytical reports are provided
in Appendix- C-l). Each composite kiln "ash sample was prepared by combining aliquots of the
kiln ash from each of the three tests performed with  each sludge.  As shown  in Table 17, the
initial ash fusion temperature under oxidizing conditions for the lagoon 3  sludge kiln  ash,
1,070°C (1,960°F), was significantly, lower than that of the lagoon 8 sludge kiln ash, 1,200°C
(2,200 °F). This is consistent with the test observations, noted in Section 2.3, that significant kiln
slagging was experienced  during  Tests 1 through 3, with the lagoon 3  sludge.  Less severe
                                           28
-------
TABLE 15.  SLUDGE FEED PROXIMATE AND ULTIMATE ANALYSIS RESULTS
Parameter Lagoon 3 sludge
Proximate analysis (as received)
Moisture, %
Volatile matter at 105 °C, %
Total loss on drying, %
Volatile matter at 900 °C
Ash, %
Fixed carbon, %
Higher heating value, MJ/kg
(Btu/lb)
Bulk density, g/mL
Ultimate analysis, % (dry basis)
C
H
Oa
N
S
Cl
Ash

39.6
15.7
55.3
17.1 -
26.7
0.9
12.4
(5,340)
1.36

19.0
1.3
10.6
2.2
3.7
3.5
59.7
Lagoon 8 sludge

46.8
6.4
53.2
7.9
38.9
<0.2
12.5
(5,380)
1.37

4.6
0.4
<0.1
0.1
12.7
<0.1
83.1
aBy difference.
          TABLE 16. SLUDGE FEED AND ASH COLLECTED
Ash coUected
Total sludge fed
Test
Lagoon 3 sludge
1
2
3
Lagoon 8 sludge
4
5
6
Date

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91

11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91
kg

251
272
245

236
225
232
Ib

553
599
539

520
495
511
Weight
kg

49
51
50

90
91
. 87
Ib

108
113
111

199
201
193
Fraction of
feed, %

20
19
21

38
41
38
                            29
-------
                  TABLE 17. .COMPOSITE ASH CHARACTERISTICS

                                               Kiln ash from:
                   Parameter	Lagoon 3 sludge    Lagoon 8 sludge

             Bulk density, g/mL          1.20             0.92

             Ash fusion temperature

               Oxidizing

                Initial,          °C       1,070            1,200
                               (°F)      (1,960)          (2,200)

                Fluid,           °C       1,210            1,280
                               (°F)      (2,210)          (2,340)

               Reducing

                Initial,          °C       1,480            1,480
                               (°F)      (2,700)          (2,700)

                Fluid                    Out of range    . Out of range
slagging was observed during Tests 4 through 6, with the lagoon 8 sludge.  Both sludges had
substantially higher, and equal, ash fusion temperatures under reducing conditions.

4.2    VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS RESULTS

       Because the volatile organic constituent compositions of the two lagoon sludges tested
were significantly different, the volatile organic analysis results discussion is organized by sludge
in the following subsections.  .

4.2.1   Lagoon 3 Sludge Tests

        Recall from the discussion in Section 2 that four 55-gal drums of each lagoon sludge
tested were received at the IRF. For the tests with the lagoon 3 sludge, the contents of a single
55-gal drum were repackaged into fiberpack drums for feeding to the RKS the day before a
given test. A composite sample of the material from each drum was collected just prior to the
repackaging.  The contents of one  drum of lagoon 3 sludge (drum  1) were  repackaged  on
October 21,  1991, in anticipation for Test 1 which was scheduled for October 22.  However,
problems were encountered in establishing  steady incinerator  operation on October 22, and
several episodes of loss of kiln flame occurred.  Thus, the sampling effort was aborted and the
October 22 effort was redefined as a scoping test.  As a result, insufficient packaged material
from the first drum of lagoon 3 sludge, packed on October 21, remained to support a full test.
Thus, the contents of a second lagoon 3 sludge drum (drum 2) were packaged on October 23 to
support the  rescheduled Test 1, which was successfully completed on October  24. For Test 1
236 kg (519 Ib) of the drum 2 sludge and 15 kg (34 Ib)  of the drum 1 sludge was fed. The third
and  fourth  55-gal  drums  (drums  3 and 4)  of lagoon 3 sludge supported  Tests 2  and 3,
respectively.  For Test 2, 244 kg (537 Ib) of the drum 3 sludge and 28 kg (62 Ib) of the drum 4
sludge was fed. For Test 3,226 kg (498 Ib) of the drum 4 sludge and 19 kg (41 Ib) of the drum 1
sludge was fed.

                                         30
-------
        Table 18 summarizes the results of the volatile organic constituent analyses of the four
lagoon 3 sludge feed samples analyzed.  All sludge feed samples were analyzed using the high-
level sediment/soil procedure documented in Method 8240.  This method gives the practical
quantitation limits (PQLs) noted for the lagoon 8 sludge and the Test 1 lagoon 3 sludge samples
in Table 19. The drum 2 sample was the first of the lagoon 3 sludge samples analyzed.  In this
initial analysis, the volatile organic concentrations in the undiluted methanol extract prepared
in the high-level sediment/soil procedure were sufficiently high that the mass spectrometer
detector was saturated over much of the chromatogram. However, it was possible to quantitate
the levels of bromomethane, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, chlorobenzene,  ethyl benzene, and  total
xylenes noted in Table 18.  The  methanol extract was  subsequently diluted  100-fold and
reanalyzed.  This second analysis allowed quantitation of the major sludge components noted in
Table 18: methylene chloride, chloroform, benzene, and toluene.  Diluted  methanol extracts
were used in all subsequent lagoon 3 sludge sample analyses. This dilution resulted in the higher
PQLs noted for the drum 1,  drum 3, and drum 4 sludge samples in Table 19. At these higher
PQLs, the minor components noted above were not detected.

        The data in Table 18 show that all four lagoon 3 sludge samples analyzed had quite
comparable  volatile  organic composition.   The major contaminants, methylene chloride,
chloroform, benzene, and toluene, were present at average concentrations of 120,150,2,400, and
2,700 mg/kg, respectively.

        Comparing the  data in  Table 18  with past information  on the lagoon 3  sludge
composition noted in Table 2 shows that the benzene and toluene concentrations in  the sludge
excavated for testing were of the same order of magnitude as those found in  the RI.  However,
benzene concentrations in the test sludge were higher, and toluene concentrations lower,  than
the RI data. In addition, methylene chloride was not found in RI samples, and chloroform was
not noted. However, both of these compounds were present in the tested lagoon 3 sludges.

        Table 20 summarizes the volatile organic constituent concentrations measured in  each
lagoon 3 test sample (complete analytical  results are given in  Appendix C-2).  Sludge  feed
concentrations noted correspond to the individual drum concentrations weighted by the amounts
fed for each test noted above.  A compound is noted in Table  20 if it was found in any test
program sample in Tests 1 through 3. As noted above, the major volatile organic contaminants
in the  lagoon 3 sludge  samples were benzene, toluene, methylene chloride, and chloroform.
These compounds were generally not found in the incineration residuals streams (kiln ash and
scrubber liquor), or in the incinerator flue gas at the two locations sampled.  However:

        •    Benzene was found in the afterburner exit flue gas at 29 /tg/dscm, though not in
             the scrubber exit flue gas

        «    Toluene was found in the Test 1 kiln ash at just above the method PQL

        «    Methylene chloride was found in the kiln ashes of all of the tests, at levels of
             between 5 /tg/kg (the method PQL), in Test 1, to 31 /tg/kg, in Test 3.  It was also
             found in the scrubber liquors of aU of the tests at levels of 16 /tg/L,  in Tests 2
             and 3, to  110 j^g/L, in Test 1.  However, the two scrubber liquor method blanks
             consisting of samples taken of the recirculating scrubber liquor just before the
             start of sludge feed in Tests 5 and 6 also contained methylene chloride, at levels
             of 36 and 51 /*g/L, respectively. Low levels of methylene chloride in samples are
             always suspect as it is the most commonly used solvent in environmental analytical
             laboratories.
                                         31
-------
TABLE 18. VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENTS IN THE LAGOON 3 SLUDGE
Concentration, mg/kg
Constituent
Bromomethane
Methylene chloride
Chloroform
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
All others
aND = Not detected at
TABLE 19.
Drum 1
<125
230
170
<62.5
2,400
2,900
<62.5
<62.5
<62.5
NDa
the PQLs listed
Drum 2
4.3
190
190
17
2,500
3,100
55
3.5
13
ND
in Table 19.
Drum 3
<125
130
120
<62.5
2,400
2,500
<62.5
<62.5
<62.5
ND

Drum 4
<125
120
110
<62.5
2,200
2,400
<62.5
<62.5
<62.5
ND

Average
<125
170
150
<62.5
2,400
2,700
<62.5
<62.5
<62.5
ND

VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT PQLs
PQL

Constituent
Acetone
Chloromethane, vinyl
chloride,
bromomethane,
chloroethane, and
2-chloroethylvinylether
All others
Sludge feed,
mg/kg
Lagoon 3, Lagoon 3,
drums 1, 3, drum 2, and
and 4 Lagoon 8
1,250
125
62.5
' 12.5
1.25
0.625
Kiln ash,
mg/kg
0.1
0.01
0.005
Scrubber
liquor,
Mg/L
100
10
5
Flue gas,
lig/dscm
1.0
1.0
1.0
                             32
-------
I
Con
   - S
       i!

       ti
       Ed S
        •  4)
       II
   g g
   £ §
   g«
   a»  -a
   4)
   s
ii
   en
    o  rf  in   p«
    V  V  V   V
              m  o  TH  in  -f
              rn   V   V  V  V
                 S  2  in  2
                 es   v  v  v
              2  o  r~      vo
              S  g  S  ««  •»
              H" o   v  v  v
in  O
pf  V
              o
              V
                  in  o   V   V  V
                      p  p      p

                  S   V   V   V  V
                     ys  r-      o
                  o  g  re  o  ^
                  S  o   v  S  v
              TH  o  t~  TH  »-i
              v   v  oo  v  v
        S?  .«  S
        V  V   V
                      P      o  P
                  m   O  S  TH  TH
                  TT   V  S  V  V
                     I

                      «T
                                 1
                             •i   sf
                              M   oo
          ^   11
                                  u

                      £ 1   §  ?
                      I1  s  t  1
                          §   fe   u
in  3
PI  P  P4      TJ-
vo  o  TH   in  TH
V  V  V   V   V
                       fj  p  p      in
                       vo  o  i-<  in  fi
                        V  V  V  V  V
in  o
p4  P  P      P
\o  O  TH   in  T-H
V  V  V   V   V


    I
in  o  in   in  vd
pf  v  v   v   V

    m

^  o  od   m  TH
pf  V  V   V   V
                       vo  o  TH  in
                       V  V  V  V
                           p  p
                       S  o  TH  in   .H
                       S  V  V  V   ,H
                           |£2o      o
                       S  S  'H  v_   T-H
                       S  o  v  S   v



                       H  "i  P  S   P
                       TH  O  TH  1—I   TH
                       V  V  V  V   V
P4  <5  VO      O
VO  O  «-"   >"  «H
V  o  V   V   V
                       V^l   •      ^^   .UK
                       TH  O  TH  TH   g
                        v  v  od  v   J2
g/
                                                            PI      O      T-H
                                                            \o  O   T-I  >n  o
                                                            V  V   V   V  V
                                                                5
                                       p)
                       vei  o  p4  in   in
                       V  v  v  v   v
                                                                8  i  p      ^
                                                                5?  o  w  m  p)
                                                                pf  V  V   V   V
                                                                o   m  in  vc
                                                                V   V   V   V
                                                             S-       oo      ^
                                                                o   es  in  P<
                                                            V   V   V   V   V
                                                            o  o   «H  m  »H
                                                            3  V   V   V   V
                                                                H  i  P   8  P
                                                                TH  O  ^H   ^H  T-H
                                                                V  V  V   V   V
                                                                g
                                                                            in  5?
                                                                            v   v
                       S  i  §  s
                       v  v  §  v
          ts
                                                                                a
                                                                                e
                                                                  O
                                                                  OH
                                                                   O
                                                                                "8
                                                                                ^
                                               33
-------
        •    Chloroform was found in the Test 2 scrubber exit flue gas just at the method PQL

Incineration effectively  decontaminated the lagoon 3 sludge of its major volatile  organic
constituents. Using the sludge feed and ash collected weights from Table 16, combined with the
composition data in Table 20, shows that:

        •    At most, 0.005 percent of the amount of methylene chloride fed was found in the
             corresponding kiln ash discharge; thus, the  decontamination effectiveness for
             methylene chloride was at least 99.995 percent

        •    Less than  0.0009 percent of the chloroform fed was found in the corresponding
             kiln  ash discharge; thus, the decontamination effectiveness was greater than
             99.9991 percent

        •    At most, 0.00006 percent of the amount of benzene or toluene fed was found in
             the corresponding kiln ash  discharge; thus, the decontamination effectiveness for
             these two contaminants was at least 99.99994  percent

        The term decontamination effectiveness used above  is a measure of the degree to which
the incineration process removed the organic contaminants from sludge. The decontamination
effectiveness levels are not, of themselves, meaningful in determining whether concentration-
based residue standards  are achieved, nor should they be interpreted as DREs.

        Other data in Table 20 show that:

        •    Bromomethane, detected in the Test 1 sludge feed, was found in the afterburner
             exit flue gases in all of the tests at levels ranging from 8.1 /ig/dscm, in Test 2, to
             480 /ig/dscm, in Test 1. It was also found in the Tests 2 and 3 scrubber exit flue
             gases at .92 (Test 3) to 760 /ig/dscm. Bromomethane is commonly found in tap
             water as a byproduct of the disinfection process used in some potable water
             treatment plants. Because tap water is  used for the scrubber system makeup at
             the IRF, bromomethane's presence in  scrubber exit flue gas is expected. Its
             absence from the scrubber liquor is understandable because the scrubber liquor
             becomes purged of this compound by the flue gas being scrubbed. Its presence
             in afterburner exit flue gas is not similarly explainable.

        •    Trichlorofluoromethane was found in the kiln ashes of all three lagoon 3 sludge
             tests at 6. /ig/kg, in Tests 1 and 2, to 20 /ig/kg> m Test 35 the method PQL is
             5 /ig/kg. Low levels of this compound are always suspect because it is a common
             refrigerant and polyurethane foam blowing agent.

        •    Acetone was found in the Test 1 afterburner exit flue gas, though not in the
             scrubber exit flue gas

        •    1,1,1-Trichloroethane and  chlorobenzene  were found in the Test 1  kiln ash at
             10 /ig/kg and 100 /ig/kg, respectively; the method PQL is 5 jug/kg

4.2.2    Lagoon 8 Sludge Tests

        In contrast to the manner in which the drums of test material were  handled  for the
lagoon 3 sludge tests, for the lagoon 8 sludge tests all four drums of sludge were mixed in a
                                          34
-------
trough prior to the sludge's packaging into fiberpack drums. Two composite lagoon 8 sludge feed
samples were taken and analyzed to give the sludge feed composition data for Tests 4, 5, and 6.

        Table 21 summarizes the volatile organic constituent concentrations measured in each
lagoon 8 sludge incineration test sample (complete analytical results are given in Appendix C-2).
Again, a compound is noted in Table 21 if it was found  in any test sample from  Tests 4
through 6.

        As shown in Table 21, toluene was the only volatile organic contaminant found in the
lagoon 8 sludge; it was present at only 3 mg/kg. Toluene was found in all three kiln ash samples
at levels of 36 to 38 /ig/kg. Using the sludge feed and ash collected weights from Table 16, the
amount of toluene discharged in the kiln ash was about 0.5 percent of the amount fed. Thus,
incineration achieved a decontamination efficiency for toluene of about 99.5 percent.

        Benzene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes were found in all kiln ash samples at about 40,10,
and 10 /ig/kg,  respectively.  No toluene, benzene, ethyl benzene, or xylenes were found in the
scrubber liquor or the flue gas at either location sampled. In addition:

        •    Bromomethane was found in the incineration  flue gas at the afterburner exit at
             levels ranging from 22 /ig/dscm, in Test 5, to 38 /ig/dscm, in Test 4; and at the
             scrubber exit at levels ranging from 22 /ig/dscm, in Test 5, to 1,100 /ig/dscm, in
             Test 4.  Similar levels were observed  in the flue gases in Tests 1 through 3 with
             the lagoon 3 sludge; its expected source is discussed in Section 4.2.1.

        •    Methylene chloride was found in the  kiln ashes of all of the tests at 65,. 28, and
             5 /tg/kg in Tests 4,5, and 6, respectively. It was also found in the scrubber liquors
             of all of the tests at  22, 34,  and 20 fig/L in Tests 4, 5, and 6, respectively.  As
             noted in Section 4.2.1, however, low levels of methylene chloride are always
             suspect because it is such,a common laboratory solvent.

        •    1,1,1-Trichloroethane was found  in  the Test 3 afterburner  exit  flue gas  at
             72 /tg/dscm

43     SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS RESULTS

        Table  22 summarizes the semivolatile organic constituent analysis results for the four
lagoon 3 sludge samples analyzed (complete analytical results are given in Appendix C-3).  As
shown, only two semivolatile organic constituents were found at concentrations above the method
PQLs noted in Table 23.  All four lagoon 3  sludge samples contained comparable levels  of
azobenzene, averaging 5,110 mg/kg, and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine, averaging 4,390 mg/kg.  Only
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine was found at a concentration above the method PQL in the composite
lagoon 8 sludge sample, at 710 mg/kg.

        The PQLs listed in Table 23 correspond to the concentration of each constituent in the
lowest level calibration standard, corrected for the amount of dilution required to bring a sample
extract's highest level organic constituent concentration into the instrument's calibration range.
Thus, for example,  the lowest level calibration standard corresponded to an aqueous liquid
constituent concentration of 10 to 25 /ig/L, and a low  level solids (e.g., kiln ash) concentration
of 1  to 2.5 mg/kg.  The organic extracts of the test  sludge feed samples, however, required
dilution prior to analysis. The lagoon 8 sludge sample extracts required 50-fold dilution, and the
higher level lagoon 3 sludge  sample extracts required 1000-fold dilution.  This resulted in the
matrix-adjusted PQLs for these samples noted in Table 23.


                                          35
-------

p
CO
00
Z
0
O
o
M
Cd
J*j
5C
H
0 §
fa :s
co 2
E"< cs
rj S
VW4 (^
5 i
CO Q
53
P5
to
£
1
H
Z
3
fc
S
Z
8
U
tn
GS g
^ !?

"" *!
S S
*
a)
§
3
3
H
a
s
£

5 P s
5 1 g
^*> jS ^^
rt ° *


CO V)
v v


<*>
v a

S v,
V V

o
-^ 1— 1
^r y

en
00
J
bo ,

1— 1
V


V

CO
V

1


1
1
u
3
4-*
'S
Scrubber i


il
g -.0
g 'W


S P
0 -H
e v

>o ^
S *H
o v

1 3


v>
8 t-
o r-
V V


CO Q
o <^
o v

I ,
v v

o
v a

1
1
cs
00
1 S
* 1
* -e
m e 
V


v^
V


V



VI
V


f)

VI
V

S
v



1
I
Scrubber


S
p
V


"5


T}.
C*j
V

VO
V


0)
vH
v


v

S
V

s


1
i

2 ^5


il
0
VI TH
V V


o
in 1-1
V V

VO
in fi
Y V

in IH
V V


p
V) vH
V V


(5 V

OS
in in
V V

0 g
i-H *
v 3

-
•5,
5i J
bo ^
3. Q)
o ^
Scrubber
Scrubber


























3
jj
£
3
2
o
£
1
OJ
II


36
-------
"S8
g
a
!
I
Q
   S

   o
  a
   s
   a
         Cfl
  oo
  vf
  VO
  vf o
      o
      o\
      o
        06
      c
      jo
      "1

      I
        •s
            ^^
            o
£
^c
•o
ID
3
2
I
                "O
                
-------
        No semivolatile organic constituents were found at concentrations above the PQLs listed
in Table 23 in any test program incineration residuals (kiln ash and scrubber liquor) or flue gas
(measured and both the afterburner and scrubber exits) samples.  Using the sludge feed and ash
collected  weights  from  Table 16, combined with  the sludge  feed  organic contaminant
concentrations noted above and the ash contaminant PQLs noted in Table 23:

        •    Less than 0.007 to 0.010 percent of the amount of azobenzene fed in the lagoon 3
             sludge tests was present in the corresponding kiln ash discharge; thus, the
             decontamination effectiveness for azobenzene from the lagoon 3 sludge was
             greater than 99.990 to 99.993 percent
        •    Less than 0.008 to 0.01 1 percent of the amount of 3.3'-dichlorobenzidine fed in the
             lagoon 3 sludge tests was present in the corresponding kiln ash discharge; thus, the
             decontamination effectiveness for 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine from the lagoon 3 sludge
             was greater than 99.989 to 99.992 percent

        •    Less than 0. 1 1 percent of the amount of 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine fed in the lagoon 8
             sludge tests was present in the corresponding kiln ash discharge; thus, the
             decontamination effectiveness  for  3,3'-dichlorobenzidine was  greater  than
             99.89 percent.
4.4     POHCDREs
        Remedial actions taken at Superfund sites must consider any applicable or relevant and
appropriate requirements (ARARs). Thus, onsite incineration treatment of the Bofors-Nobel
site sludges must consider the federal hazardous waste incinerator performance standards. These
standards require that an incinerator undergo a trial burn to establish the incinerator's ability
to achieve a 99.99 percent DRE for designated POHCs in the wastes to be treated.

        In planning a trial burn, the hazardous waste incinerator regulations require the
incinerator  operator to  designate the  POHCs  in the trial burn wastes that will be used to
demonstrate 99.99 percent DRE.  Candidate POHCs are listed in Appendix VHI of 40 CFR
Part 261 (Appendix VIE).   The regulations specify selecting POHCs based  on two criteria:
concentration in the waste, and difficulty to incinerate.  With respect to concentration, current
guidance  recommends that only  constituents  present  in the  waste at levels greater than
100 mg/kgbe considered. With respect to difficulty to incinerate, current guidance recommends
using the thermal-stability-based incinerability ranking developed by the University of Dayton
Research Institute (UDRI), under contract to EPA's Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
(RREL)11.

        Table 24 lists the  organic  constituents  in the lagoon 3 sludge that are listed in
Appendix VIE (azobenzene is  not) and quantitated  in the sludge at levels greater than
100 mg/kg. Also shown in Table 24 are both the overall ranking indices for each compound
within the 320 POHCs ranked11 and the relative ranking within the five candidate POHCs listed.

        The data in Table 24 suggest that the appropriate POHCs to select for a trial burn of
lagoon 3 sludge are benzene, toluene, and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine. Benzene and toluene are both
present at relatively high concentrations in the sludge, and have the top two relative difficulty-to-
incinerate rankings (in the incinerability ranking, No. 1 is the hardest compound to incinerate,
and No. 320 the easiest).  Methylene chloride and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine have comparable overall
incinerability indices; the difference between 65 and 67 in the overall ranking is not significant.
                                           38
-------
      TABLE 24. CANDIDATE TRIAL BURN POHCs IN THE LAGOON 3 SLUDGE
Average lagoon 3
sludge concentratit
Compound mg/kg
Benzene
Toluene
Methylene chloride
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
Chloroform
2,400
2,700
170
4,390
150
Thermal-stability-
based ranking
»n,
Overall8
3
35
65
67
160
Relative0
1
2
3
4
5
           aOverall ranking within 320 compounds ranked; relative ranking
           within 5 candidate lagoon 3 sludge POHCs.


Of the two POHCs, 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine is the  better choice because it  is present  in the
lagoon 3 sludge at a much higher concentration.

       POHC selection for the lagoon 8 sludge is quite simple; only 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine was
found at levels above 100 mg/kg in this sludge.

       The sludge feed and flue gas concentrations of the POHCs discussed in Sections 4.2 and
4.3 were combined  with the sludge feedrate data  discussed in Section 2.3,  and the flue gas
flowrate data presented in the sampling train worksheets in Appendix D-2, to calculate the
POHC DREs achieved for each test. These DREs are shown in Table 25.

       As discussed in Sections 4.2 and 4.3, none of the POHCs specified above for these tests
was detected in any flue gas sample analyzed, with the exception  of benzene in the lagoon 3
sludge Test 1 afterburner exit flue gas.  Therefore, except for this one instance, only a lower
bound POHC DRE, based on the flue gas analysis method PQL, can be established. Most of
the entries in Table 25, as a result, indicate that POHC DRE was greater than this lower bound.

        The test results summarized in Table 25 show that a greater than 99.99 percent DRE
was clearly achieved in the lagoon 3 sludge tests for toluene and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine in Test 1,
3,3'-dichlorobenzidine in Test 2, and benzene, toluene, and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine in Test 3, as
measured both at the afterburner exit and the scrubber exit. In addition, benzene and toluene
DREs, as measured at the scrubber exit, were clearly greater than 99.99 percent in Test 2.  The
afterburner exit flue gas benzene level measured in Test 1 corresponded to a 99.96 percent
DRE.  No benzene was found in the scrubber exit flue gas, corresponding to a benzene DRE of
greater than 99.97 percent.  Clear compliance with  the 99.99 percent POHC DRE standard at
the scrubber exit was shown for all three lagoon 3 sludge POHCs, with  this one detection limit
exception.

        For the lagoon 8 sludge tests, methods PQLs,  combined with the low feed POHC
concentrations, corresponded to lower bound DREs for 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine of 99.971 to
                                          39
-------














va
iy
Q
tj
^•j
O
«
IS
CN
3
1
H
















tf
Q















1
S
•fi
1
Cfl
2
•C
4.1

2!
9
en
1



*J
P4
W
1

A
hi
|
o>
j-

«
1

A
1

wa


(M
.w
J5


1




T— 1 ("* "^
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
A A A
O fl ON
en I-H i^-
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
A A A
fi ON
Tf in >o
t**" ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
A A A


cJ 5^ 9
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
A A A


O
ON ^t* V)
oo oo ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
A A A
c^ oo
\O ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
ON ON ON
A A
u
12
ft 1
ts P
1 ' $
1 1 I 9
f. a S &

ve
1


V)
<_,
S


i



ve
4>9

S


VJ
«
y."
|^


^t
1

:*
OS
os
OS
A

v>
&
os
OS
A

1
A


^
t^*
Os
OS
OS
A


N
OS
Ov
OS
A

•t-H
Os
OS
OS
A
.1
12
-------
99.972 percent, as measured in the afterburner exit flue gas, and 99.974 to 99.975 percent, as
measured in the scrubber exit flue gas.
4.5
TRACE METAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
        Results of the  trace metal analyses of test program samples  are  discussed in
Section 4.5.1 below. The evaluation of these data in terms of the metal partitioning among the
various incinerator discharge and flue gas emission streams is presented in Section 4.5.2.

4.5.1    Trace Metal Concentrations in Test Program Samples

        Table 26 summarizes the trace metals analysis results for  the four lagoon 3 sludge
samples analyzed. As shown, the trace metal compositions of the four  samples were quite
comparable. Comparing the average lagoon 3 sludge trace metal composition data in Table 26
with the RI data in Table 2 shows that the levels of most metals in the incineration test lagoon 3
sludge were roughly half or less of the corresponding levels found in the RI.

        TCLP leachates of each of the four lagoon 3 sludge samples were also analyzed for trace
metals.  None of the metals analyzed for was found in any TCLP leachate sample, with the
exception of barium and lead. Barium was found in the TCLP leachates of all four lagoon 3
sludge samples at concentrations ranging from 0.084 to 0.10 /tg/L.  Lead was found in only the
TCLP leachate of the Test 2 lagoon 3 sludge at 0.15 mg/L, which was just above the method
detection limit (MDL) of 0.10 mg/L.

        As the trace metal compositions of all four lagoon 3 sludge samples and their TCLP
leachates were quite  comparable, all evaluations in this section use the  average sludge  and
leachate concentrations.
              TABLE 26. TRACE METALS  IN THE LAGOON 3 SLUDGE

                                      Concentration, mg/kg
            Metal
                 Drum 1
               Scoping tests
Drum 2
 Test 1
                                    Drum 3
                                     Test 2
                    Drum 4
                    Test3
Average
Antimony

Arsenic     2.3

Barium     17

Beryllium   <0.2

Cadmium   11

Chromium   29

Lead        490

Mercury    < 1

Selenium    <20

Silver       < 1
1.1

16

<0.2

12

31

480


<20
1.1
18
<0.2
9.9
25
400
<1
17
<0.2
11
26
510
1.4*
17
<0.2
11
28
470
                                               <20
                                                 <20
                             <20
          aAssumes the Test 3 sample contained arsenic at the PQL.
                                        41
-------
        Table 27 summarizes the trace metal concentrations measured in each lagoon 3 sludge
incineration test sample (complete analytical results are given in Appendix C-4). The average
lagoon 3 sludge feed and sludge feed TCLP leachate concentrations are given in Table 27, as
noted above.  The five metals found in lagoon 3 sludge samples are listed in the first five
columns of Table 27; the five metals not found in any lagoon 3 sludge sample are listed in the
last five columns. Two scrubber liquor blanks comprised  of samples taken of the recirculating
scrubber liquor just before the start of waste feed for 5 and 6 were analyzed. As discussed in
Section 6.3, measurable levels of all five metals found in sludge feed samples were found in these
blanks.  The scrubber liquor concentrations shown in Table 27, however, are as measured and
not corrected for the blank levels found.

        The data in Table 27 show that none of the metals absent in lagoon 3 sludge samples
was found in any other test program sample.  Metals found in the lagoon 3 sludge samples were
distributed among all other incineration residuals and flue gas samples, with the exception of
arsenic, which was not found in the scrubber  exit flue gas in Tests 2 and 3.  Metal concentration
data for the scrubber exit flue gas stream noted in the table often appear as ranges.  This arises
from the fact that two samples from the metals sampling train were analyzed to yield the flue
gas stream concentration, a participate probe wash plus filter sample, and an impinger solution
sample. In many cases, the metal was present in one sample but not detected in the other.  In
these cases, therefore, the flue gas concentrations are shown as ranges.  The lower bound of a
range assumes metals not detected in a sample were not present (zero concentration); the upper
bound  of a range assumes metals not detected in a sample were present at the MDL.  Several
scrubber exit flue gas  concentrations noted are less than concentrations.   These were  not
detected in either flue gas sampling train sample; The upper bound corresponds to the higher
of the two sampling train sample MDLs.

        The data in Table 27 show that the concentrations of the five metals detected in the
lagoon 3 sludge were comparable from test to test in the incinerator discharge streams with the
exception of arsenic, barium, cadmium, and chromium in  the scrubber liquor. Scrubber liquor
concentrations for these four metals were significantly lower for Test 3 than for Tests  1 and 2.
The authors have no explanation for this observation.

        Focusing on the scrubber exit flue gas concentrations, the data in Table 27 show that
arsenic, barium, and chromium levels in the flue gas were generally less than 50 jtg/dscm.
However, cadmium and lead levels were significantly higher at 153 to 206 /xg/dscm for cadmium,
and 4,420 to 6,180 jig/dscm for lead.  The origin of these levels is discussed in Section 4.5.2.

        All test kiln ash samples were subjected to the TCLP and resulting leachates analyzed.
These results are shown in Table 27.  The TCLP regulatory level used to establish  the toxicity
characteristic (TC) is also noted in the table.  As shown, neither the lagoon 3 sludge nor the kiln
ash resulting from its incineration had leachate metal concentrations that would make them TC
hazardous wastes.

        The lead concentrations in the bulk, unfiltered, scrubber liquor samples from all three
tests exceeded the TCLP regulatory level, and the cadmium concentrations were about half the
cadmium TC regulatory level.  However, the TCLP allows filtering a solids-containing liquid
sample.  If the  suspended-solids  content is less than 0.5  percent by weight, the solids can be
discarded.  The resulting filtrate becomes the TCLP leachate.  A composite of the lagoon 3
sludge  test scrubber liquor from all three  tests was so  analyzed, with the  results noted in
Table 27. Only lead was detected in the composite scrubber liquor leachate, and at a level below
the TCLP regulatory level.
                                          42
-------
B

8

1

Z
O
Ed
g
D
CO
ss
CO
g
ISO
                     p
                 IH   es
                 V    V
                 3   2
                 V    V
                 i-l   O
                 V    V
                 o   es
                 V    V
                S   5
                 V    V
                     o
                      V
                     o
                     o
                      V
                     o
                      V
                •o"
                 u
                &
                 o

                     o
                     V
                     1
                      u
                     •a
                      u
 3   i.1
•S   es
 u   ^-

 2   -
 8?   «
                                    p        o
                               »H   es   w   es
                               V   V   V   V
                               es   *"?   vo   ^
                               ?5   C5   vS   O
                               V   V   V   V
                               1-H   O
                               V   V
                        o
                         V
                               O   O   T-I   O
                               V   V   V   V
                               O    •   If)    •
                               i-l   O   W   O
                               v   v   v   v
                                    s   I
                                    i   s
                                         «<1   0
                                    8
                                     .    i
                                    S   00
                                    ea
                                    4=

                               •S   -S
                               (9   C9

                               i   i
                                         a
                                         "8
                                         s
                                                            P        p
                                                       i—I   O   CO   O
                                                        v    v   v   v
                                                       O        C4
                                                       
                                                             o-
                                             f
                                              S
                                                       f
                                                   ts

                                                                 a"   ^
                                                                 0
                                                                    00   O   O
                                                                     V   V   V
                                                           M   o   «-i   o   cs
                                                           V    V   V   V   V
*H   O
V   V
                                                                                in
                                                                               00
                                                                               f>
o   o
V   V
                        o   o   1-1   es   *s
                        v   v   v   v   z
                                                          s   S   s   S  -<;
                                                           v    v    v   v   z
                                                               <»>   <2   t^   p
                                                               o   -i   o   o
                                                               §   2   S   v
                                                                                              o   o
                                                                                              o   v
                                                                                    O   i-l   O
                                  T   ?   I
                                  c-   £   o
                                  v   o   v
                                                                                     S
                                                                                     o

              |   'S   1   1
              •g   ?rt    c   e

              V3    1£   *   ^N
          g
         I
                                                                                                -
bbe
                                                                                                           O
                                                                                                           wS
                                            if

                                            II
                                            «•  u
                                                                                                           2

                                                                                                           i
                                                           43
-------
        The TCLP leachate data in Table 27 show that cadmium and lead were not detected in
the TCLP leachates of the lagoon 3 sludge, or the kiln ash, from any test. Arsenic was sparingly
leachable from the kiln ashes from all tests.  Chromium was found near the PQL in two of three
test leachates. Kiln ash and leachate concentrations of barium were roughly double that of the
lagoon 3 sludge.

        Table 28 summarizes the trace metal analysis results for all lagoon 8 sludge incineration
test samples.  Because  all lagoon 8 sludge tests were conducted using a single, composite
lagoon 8 sludge, only a  single sludge feed composition representing the average of the two
composites analyzed is  noted in Table 28.  Comparing the trace metal composition of the
composite lagoon 8 sludge used in the incineration tests with the RI data given in Table 2 shows
that the same four metals were found in the test lagoon 8 sludge as reported in the RI.  In
addition, the six metals reported as not detected in the RI were not detected in the test sludge.
However, concentrations of the four contaminant metals in the lagoon 8 test sludge were roughly
half or less of those reported in the RI.

        As was the case for the lagoon 3 sludge tests,  no lagoon 8 sludge sample contained
detectable antimony, beryllium, mercury, selenium, or silver.   Levels of arsenic,  barium, and
chromium in the lagoon  8 sludge were in the same range as in the lagoon 3 sludge. No cadmium
was found in the lagoon  8 sludge. Also, lagoon 8 sludge lead levels were much lower than those
in the lagoon 3 sludge.

        The data in Table 28 show that none of the metals absent in the lagoon 8 sludge was
found in any other test program sample, with the exception of cadmium, which was found at low
levels in the scrubber exit flue gases of all three tests, and in the scrubber liquors of two of the
three tests.  Metals found in the lagoon 8 sludge were distributed among all other incineration
residuals and flue gas samples, with the possible exception of lead, which was found in the
Tests 5 and 6 kiln ash samples at just greater than the MDL, and not found above the MDL in
the Test 4 kiln ash samples.  Incinerator discharge stream concentrations of the four metals
detected in the lagoon 8 sludge were comparable from test to test  with the exception of the
scrubber  liquor  arsenic  and  lead concentrations and the  scrubber  exit  flue gas  lead
concentrations, all of which steadily decreased from Test 4 through Test 6. As for the data in
Table 27, the scrubber  liquor  concentrations in Table 28 are measured values, not blank-
corrected by the scrubber liquor blank sample analysis results.

        Focusing on the scrubber exit flue gas metal concentrations, the data  in Table 28 show
that  arsenic, barium, and chromium  concentrations in the flue gas were less than  about
20 jig/dscm. Cadmium and lead levels were much reduced from those seen in  the lagoon 3
sludge tests, reflecting the much decreased concentrations of these two metals in the lagoon 8
sludge feed (cadmium was not detected). The much higher lead concentration in the Test 4 flue
gas compared to the Tests 5 and 6 flue gases is suspected to be the  result  of some residual
lagoon 3 sludge material from Test 3 left in the afterburner. This suspicion is further discussed
in Section 4.5.2.   .

        The data in Table 28 further show that neither the lagoon 8 sludge feed sample nor any
of the  test  kiln ash samples would be  TC  hazardous wastes based on  the trace metal
concentrations in their TCLP leachates.  In addition, the trace metal concentrations measured
in scrubber liquor samples were sufficiently low that no test's scrubber liquor discharge would
be a  TC hazardous waste, with the possible exception of the test 4  unfiltered scrubber liquor,
which had a lead concentration of twice the TCLP regulatory level. As with the lagoon 3 sludge
tests, the scrubber liquor metal concentrations noted in Table 28 reflect bulk scrubber liquor
samples, which include the flue gas paniculate collected as suspended solids. If most of the lead


                                          44
-------




en
H
M
|2
t*^
W
O
o
1

ee
O
o
O
*^|
Ed
B
H
O
EE*

1/3
W3

pfi
M
|
3
i
1
TABLE 28.


^

0)
va



>Sr
SN



aa


1 *
%•*
2
fi
8
S *



u

S
^

03
Cfl


1


i—H
V
S
V


<*•!
O
v


*M
0
v
o
1-4
V


3



8

10
o
V
8

oo
O

I
i
3>
1
CO
o
o
V
o
V

10
o
o
V


i
0
v
T-H
O
V


o
v

,_i
^
0
v
in
§
o
v
i
o
S
0
v
J
>=
ludge feed TCLP leachate, mg
est 4 (11/5/91)
CO H
S =
*™^ C5 f^ ^5
V V V V
* o 5? e>
v v v v

>o « in
O J O
*H o 'S c>
v v 2 v


^ § 1
O O ^H O
v v v v
O *"J vo "^ •
S o S o
.V V V V

s
* '5 8 =
v v ?5 2



ov F? S ?!
10 e cs o
10
10 S ' <*>
o o t^- o
v v «/> ' o
oo oo
10 <*5 ^ *"1
VO O M O
i
^ V ' ^
C?N " CO O
-
M Tj
. "Ss
a * j
10 sT
S a> S
Is 1 it
g P 55 S3 ^
f43 SS 53 ^
J§ A * d
g c g g l/>
H
g
•rt 0
V V
S es
v v

10
^
TH O
V V


i
PJ O
0 0
V V
s 5
V V


**4
O
S v



» §5
IO O
•
« s
0 0
V V
rr ^
r- o
§
d o
TT V

1
o-
1
jjp ~
E ^
•gf -s
ca a
.•S jS


«
v
}S
V


•
^
z



^H
V
s
v


§



1-4
4


fO
^
2

vo
£
Scrubber exit flue gas, jug/dsc

g
0
v
o
V

10
^
0
V


i
o
v
o"
V


^-H



O

s
o
v
10
O
VO
§
0

Scrubber liquor, mg/L
est 6 (11/7/91)
H
o
»-l O
v v
§ o
V V

•o
«•!
^•H O
V V

,
^ i
o o
V V
0 1
»H O
V V


T-H



£ s

.0 I
«S 0
v v
00
VO O
1
CO 0
• y

• f
1
^a>
fpk
u


ro
V
»
V


•
^
Z



^^
v
15
V


1


«/^



<*)
cij
T-H

3E

I
1
i
1
CO

0
O o
V 10
O o
V rt

•o
!•>
O (S
V 0


i
o /— »
v e
i-H
-------
in the Test 4 scrubber liquor was nonsoluble lead in filterable suspended solids, as was the case
for the lagoon 3 sludge test scrubber liquor, the Test 4 scrubber liquor would also not be a TC
hazardous waste.   No  filtrate sample of lagoon 8 sludge test scrubber liquor was  analyzed,
however.

        The TCLP leachate data in Table 28 show that only barium was measurably leachable
in the TCLP leachate from the lagoon 8 sludge.  Barium was present in all test kiln ash TCLP
leachates at a level of about four times that in the sludge leachates. No arsenic, cadmium, or
lead was found in any test's kiln ash leachate. Chromium was found in the kiln ash  leachates
of all 3 tests at levels just under 1 mg/L.

        Because the TCLP involves producing 20 g of leachate per gram of solid leached, the
TCLP leachate concentration in mg/L can be used to calculate the fraction of metal, in each
sample, that is "mobile," or leachable, in the procedure.  For example, if all the metal  in a solid
sample leached in the procedure (was 100 percent leachable), the resulting TCLP leachate metal
concentration in mg/L would be l/20th of the solid sample concentration in mg/kg. Thus, the
ratio of

               20 x leachate concentration (mglL)lsolid concentration (mg/kg)            (!)
represents the fraction of leachable metal in the procedure.

        Table 29 summarizes the fractional leachabilities of the sludge feeds and resulting kiln
ashes for all six tests.  The "less than" teachabilities noted in the table arise when the leachate
contained no detectable metal; the "less than" level corresponds to the MDL of the leachate. No
fractional teachability was  calculated  when both  solid  sample  and  resulting leachate
concentrations were less than detectable.

        In addition to the conclusions noted above regarding metal teachabilities from test
samples, the data in the Table 29 further show that about 10 percent of the barium present in
the lagoon 3 sludge and in the kiln ashes of both lagoon sludges was leachable by the TCLP.
While chromium was, at most, sparingly leachable from both lagoon sludges and the kiln ash
resulting from the incineration of the lagoon 3 sludge, between 21 and 34 percent of the
chromium in the kiln ash resulting from the lagoon 8 sludge was leachable by the TCLP. While
the reason that chromium was much more leachable from kiln  ash resulting from the lagooe 8
sludge tests can only be postulated, one possible explanation may be the high sulfur content of
the lagoon 8 sludge. The presence of almost 13 percent sulfur in the lagoon 8 sludge may have
allowed the formation of soluble chromium sulfates in the discharged kiln ash, rendering the
chromium more leachable from the lagoon 8  sludge kiln ash than from the parent sludge or
either the lagoon 3 sludge or the kiln ash resulting from its incineration.

452    Trace Metal Distributions

        The test sample concentration data from Tables 27 and 28 can be combined with the
sludge feed and  kiln ash discharge amounts noted in Table 16, the quantity of scrubber liquor
collected from Table 7, and the flue gas flowrate data given in the sampling train data sheets in
Appendix D-3, to calculate the distributions of the trace metals among the various incinerator
discharges of the tests. In calculating the metal distributions, the scrubber liquor concentrations
measured and listed in Tables 27 and 28 were blank corrected by subtracting the average of the
metal concentrations measured in the two scrubber liquor blank samples as noted in Section 6.3.
                                          46
-------
              TABLE 29. FRACTIONAL LEACHABILITIES BY THE TCLP

                                         Fraction leachable, %
                      Sample	As    Ba    Cd     Cr     Pb

                 Lagoon 3 sludge

                   Average sludge   <71    11    <0.9   <0.7    <0.6

                   Kiln ash                '\

                    Test 1         9       9     <4    <0.3    <7

                    Test 2         4       10    <4    1       <7

                    TestS         3       12    <5    2       <7

                 Lagoon 8 sludge

                   Sludge          <2     5     (a)    <0.6    <18

                   Kiln ash
Test 4
TestS
Test 6
<0.2
<0.5
<0.5
12
11
11
(a)
(a)
(a)
24
34
21
(a)
<17
<18
                  aMetal not found in solid sample.
        Table 30 summarizes the trace metal distributions among the incinerator discharge
streams, expressed as fractions (in percent) of the amount of each metal measured in the
incinerator feed for each test. Thus, the values in the table represent the fraction of the metal
fed to the kiln accounted for by the noted discharge.  The rows labeled Total" represent the
total amount of metal accounted for by the sum of the discharges analyzed as a fraction of that
measured in the feed. Thus, these rows represent the degree of mass balance closure achieved
for each metal in each test. Several metal distribution fractions are shown as ranges for the flue
gas discharges and the "Total" rows. These ranges arise from the concentration ranges discussed
above in conjunction with the Tables 27 and 28 data. Only four of the five metals detected in
sludge feed  samples are listed in Table 30.  Arsenic  is not listed in the table because its
concentration in the sludge feed samples was only in the 1 mg/kg range and just above the MDL
of the analysis.  Worksheets containing the metal distribution calculations are included  in
Appendix E.

        The data in Table 30 show that the trace metal mass balance closures achieved for the
lagoon 3 sludge tests ranges from 42 to 69 percent for the four metals listed.  For barium and
chromium, the kiln ash fraction predominated. In contrast, very little of the cadmium and lead
remained with the kiln ash. The largest fractions of these two metals were in the scrubber exit
flue gas, with generally less found in the scrubber  liquor.

        For the lagoon 8 sludge  tests, mass balance  closures achieved ranged from 66  to
107 percent, with the exception of the Test 4 lead closure.  Over 6 times as  much lead was
accounted for in the Test 4 discharge streams than was fed in the test. The reason for this is the

                                          47
-------
                     TABLE 30. TRACE METAL DISTRIBUTIONS
Trace metal
Lagoon 3 sludge
Test 1 Test 2 Test 3
(10/24/91) (10/29/91) (10/31/91)
Lagoon 8 sludge
Test 4 Test 5 Test 6
(11/5/91) (11/6/91) (11/7/91)
                                    Distribution, % of metal measured in feed
Barium
 Kiln ash             48     '-A  52        46
 Scrubber exit flue gas  1-2    " •>"  1-2        2
 Scrubber liquor       7          4          <2
   Total              56-57       57-58      48-50

Cadmium
 Kiln ash             4          4         4
 Scrubber exit flue gas  39         44        55
 Scrubber liquor       24         21         1
   Total              67         69        60

Chromium
 Kiln ash             55         42        43
 Scrubber exit flue gas  3          1          1
 Scrubber liquor       6          5          1
   Total              64         48         45

Lead
 Kiln ash             1          11
 Scrubber exit flue gas  26         28         39
 Scrubber liquor       15         29         7-8
   Total              42         58         47-48
                                                         65

                                                         1
                                                         66-67


                                                         (a)
                                                         (a)
                                                         (a)
                                                         (a)

                                                         68
                                                        . 2
                                                         4
                                                         74
                                                          <35
                                                          67-73
                                                          548
                                                          615-656
79
1

80-81


(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)


72
2
2
76


44
1-8
25-55
70-107
69
1
2
72


(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)


90
1
3
94


38
17-24
<34
55-96
 'Cadmium not found in feed sample.
likelihood that some material from the lagoon 3 sludge tests remained in the incineration system
and became incorporated into the Test 4 discharges.

        The lagoon 3 sludge contained an average of 470 mg/kg of lead, whereas the lagoon 8
sludge contained only 11 mg/kg. Some of the ash entrained in combustion gas and carried out
of the kiln drops out in the horizontal afterburner section of the RKS. Moreover, the holdup
of ash in the afterburner in the lagoon 3 sludge tests would have been increased over that
typically encountered because of the low ash fusion temperature of the lagoon 3 sludge kiln ash
(see Table 17).  Kiln slag formation was observed in the lagoon 3 sludge tests.  Undoubtedly,
some of the entrained ash (molten or not) exiting the kiln would have become, or remained,
molten in the higher temperature afterburner. Molten ash adheres to the afterburner walls and
takes more time to be swept out of the afterburner by the combustion gas.

        The efforts to prevent test-to-test contamination of kiln ash samples by ensuring that the
kiln  was free of a previous test's ash before starting a subsequent test were successful, as
evidenced by the fact that the Test 4 kiln ash contained no detectable lead.  However, some
TestS ash/slag apparently remained  in the  afterburner,  and  was incorporated into the
                                           48
-------
afterburner  exit flue gas paniculate and directed to the scrubber to be either collected,  as
reflected in  the scrubber liquor fraction, or emitted, as reflected in the scrubber exit flue gas
fraction. The fact that.the lagoon 3 sludge contained over 40 times the amount of lead in the
lagoon 8 sludge means that only a small amount of Test 3 material would have been needed to
greatly affect the Test 4 lead fractions.  Test 4 was apparently the only lagoon 8 sludge test
affected by lagoon 3 sludge material. Mass balance closures for Tests 5 and 6 were acceptable.

        The fact that cadmium levels in the scrubber liquor and scrubber exit flue  gas were
higher in Test 4 than in Tests 5 and 6 also supports the afterburner exit ash/slag holdup
explanation.                                                                 *
                                                                           "4
        The behaviors of barium and chromium in the lagoon 8 sludge tests were as  observed
in the lagoon 3 sludge tests; both metals were discharged predominantly in the kiln ash.  Lead
behavior in the lagoon 8 sludge tests, as indicated by the Tests 5 and 6 data, differed from that
observed in  the lagoon 3 sludge tests. For the lagoon 3 sludge, very little lead remained in the
kiln ash; most escaped the scrubber to be discharged in the scrubber exit flue gas.  In contrast,
for the lagoon 8 sludge, much more lead remained in the kiln ash.

        Except for lead in Test 4,  the levels of mass balance  closures achieved in these tests
(ranging from 42 to 107 percent, and averaging 60 to 71 percent) are considered quite good
when viewed in light of past experience in achieving trace metal mass balance closure from a
variety of combustion sources, incinerators included.  Typical mass balance closure results from
these sources have been in the 30- to 200-percent range  . The fact that most closures achieved
were less than 100 percent is expected, as some loss of metal via either particulate dropout in
the afterburner, or slagging with holdup in the afterburner, is expected, as noted above.

        A clearer picture of the relative metal distributions is possible when the data in Table  30
are normalized by the total mass balance closure achieved. Table 31 summarizes the test metal
distribution  data in this form.  The distribution fractions in Table 31 have been normalized to
the total amount of each metal measured in all the discharge streams analyzed. Thus,  these
normalized values represent fractions that would have resulted had mass balance closure in each
case been 100 percent. Note that the sum of the normalized values (the totals) for each metal
is indeed 100 percent in Table  31.  Use of the distribution fractions normalized in this manner
allow clearer data interpretation, because they remove variable mass balance closure as a source
of test-to-test data variability.   In  other words, because variable and less than perfect mass
balance closure is typically experienced, the use of normalized distributions represents a best
attempt to quantify metal partitioning phenomena.

        The normalized  metal distributions  given in Table 31  tend  to  underscore the
observations noted above in the discussion of the Table 30 data. The data in Table 31 show that
barium and chromium were relatively nonvolatile in all of the tests.  Between 84 and 96 percent
of the barium discharged was accounted for by the kiln ash in the lagoon 3 sludge tests; even
more, 96 to  99 percent, was accounted for in the lagoon 8 sludge tests.

        Similarly between 86 and 97 percent of the chromium discharged was accounted for  by
the kiln ash discharges in all of the tests. The scrubber exit flue gas accounted for 1 to 5 percent
of the chromium measured; the remaining 1 to 10 percent was found in the scrubber  liquor.

        Cadmium and lead were quite volatile in the lagoon 3 sludge tests. Only 6 percent of
the cadmium discharged and 2 to 3 percent of the lead discharged were found in the kiln ash.
Further, the major fraction of the cadmium and lead that escaped the kiln exited the scrubber
system.  About 60 percent of the cadmium discharged in Tests 1 and 2 and 92 percent  in Test 3


                                          49
-------
              TABLE 31. NORMALIZED TRACE METAL DISTRIBUTIONS
                               Lagoon 3 sludge
                                            Lagoon 8 sludge
      Trace metal
  Testl
(10/24/91)
  Test 2
(10/29/91)
  Tests
(10/31/91)
 Test 4
(11/5/91)
 TestS
(11/6/91)
 Test 6
(11/7/91)
                                         Distribution, % of metal measured
 Barium
  Kiln ash
  Scrubber exit flue gas
  Scrubber liquor
   Total

 Cadmium
  Kiln ash
  Scrubber exit flue gas
  Scrubber liquor
   Total

 Chromium
  Kiln ash
  Scrubber exit flue gas
  Scrubber liquor
 •  Total

 Lead
  Kiln ash
  Scrubber exit flue gas
  Scrubber liquor
   Total
84-86
2-4
12
100
89-91
2-4
7
100
93-96
4
<3
100
98-99
<1 .'&
1
100
98-99
1
<1
100
96
1
3
100
 6
 58
 36
 100


 86
 5
 9
 100


 3
 63
 34
 100
  6
  63
  31
  100
  87
  3
  10
  100


  2
  49
  49
  100
  6
  92
  2
  100


  97
  3
  1
  100


  3
  82
  15
  100
 (a)
 (a)
 (a)
 (a)

 93
 3
 4
 100


 <5
 11
 84-89
 100
  (a)
  (a)
  (a)
  (a)

  96
  2
  2
  100


  41-63
  1-8
  33-55
  100
(a)
(a)
(a)
(a)

96
1
3
100


40-69
19-39
<38
100
 'Cadmium not found in feed sample.
was measured in the scrubber exit flue gas.  Similarly, between 49 and 82 percent of the lead
discharged in the. lagoon 3 sludge tests was measured in the scrubber exit flue gas.

        Lead was much less volatile in the lagoon 8 sludge tests. For Tests 5 and 6, as much as
40 to 69 percent of the lead discharged was measured in the kiln ash. Interestingly, the lagoon
8 sludge contained no chlorine  (<0.1 percent, dry basis,  see Table 15).  The lagoon 3 sludge
contained 3.5 percent chlorine on a dry basis. The chlorine present in the lagoon 3 sludge could
allow the formation of lead chlorides, which are much more volatile than lead metal or lead
oxides.  This most likely explains the significantly increased lead volatility (decreased kiln ash
fraction) in the lagoon 3 sludge  tests.

        Almost all of the above observations are quite consistent with the significant body of
trace metal distribution data developed at the IRF over the past few years.  The behaviors of
barium and chromium are uniformly nonvolatile13'14. The presence of chlorine can dramatically
increase the volatility of lead13'14.
                                           50
-------
        Scrubber inlet flue gas metals concentrations were not measured in these tests.
Nevertheless, an estimate of the scrubber collection efficiency can be obtained by assuming that
the sum of the amount of metal measured in the two scrubber discharges (the scrubber liquor
and the scrubber exit flue gas) was the amount of metal in the scrubber inlet flue gas. This
allows  an  apparent  scrubber  collection efficiency to  be calculated  as  (scrubber liquor
fraction)/(scrubber liquor fraction + scrubber exit flue gas fraction).

        Table 32 summarizes the calculated scrubber collection efficiencies for barium, cadmium,
chromium, and lead. As shown, the apparent scrubber collection efficiencies for chromium were
greater than 55 percent for all tests except Test 3. The apparent lead collection efficiencies were
greater than 76 percent for two of the three lagoon 8  sludge tests and perhaps as high as
66 percent for the third. The apparent lead collection efficiencies were lower, 50 percent or less,
in the lagoon 3 sludge tests. The apparent cadmium collection efficiencies were uniformly low,
38 percent or less, in  the lagoon 3 sludge tests.  Barium apparent collection efficiencies were
quite variable.

        The combination of the highly volatile behavior of cadmium and lead in the lagoon 3
sludge tests (very low fractions  of both metals  remaining in the kiln ash discharge), and the
relatively low scrubber apparent collection efficiencies for these two metals, explains the high
scrubber exit flue gas concentrations measured,  as discussed in Section 4.5.1.

        Apparent scrubber collection efficiencies for Test 3 were uniformly lower than for the
other tests for all four metals. This is due to the unexplained low scrubber liquor concentrations
measured for this test as discussed in Section 4.5.1.
4.6
PARTICULATE AND HC1 EMISSIONS DATA
        Paniculate levels at the afterburner exit, the venturi/packed-column scrubber exit, and
the stack were measured by Method 5 trains.  Each Method 5 train was fitted with an impinger
train to collect HC1 to determine HC1 emissions. At the afterburner exit and scrubber exit, an
Anderson cascade impactor  collected particulate samples  and provided  paniculate  size
distribution information.  The results obtained are discussed in the following subsections.
           TABLE 32. APPARENT SCRUBBER COLLECTION EFFICIENCIES
                       Lagoon 3 sludge
     Metal
        Test 1     Test 2      Test 3
      (10/24/91) (10/29/91)  (10/31/91)
                                                   Lagoon 8 sludge
 Test 4     Test 5     Test 6
(11/5/91)  (11/6/91)  (11/7/91)
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
73-83
38
66-68
35
67-80
33
80-82
50
<45
2
18-20,
15-16
54-78
(a)
61-63
88-89
21-3*1
(a)
55-59
76-98
70-81
(a)
64-68
<66
   aCadmium not found in feed sample.
                                         51
-------
4.6.1    Particulate Load

        Table 33 gives the paniculate levels measured at the afterburner exit, the scrubber exit,
and the stack. The afterburner exit data shown in the table do not reflect actual afterburner exit
particulate loading because a significant amount of ash adhered to the sampling probe nozzle and
glass liner and could not be recovered. Presumably, this ash was molten when sampled, adhered
to the nozzle and probe liner walls, and solidified to become strongly attached to these walls.

        Particulate levels at  the  scrubber exit were quite high, at  195 and 266 mg/dscm,
corrected to 7 percent O2, in Tests 1 and 2 with the lagoon 3 sludge.  These levels exceed the
hazardous waste incinerator performance standard of  180 mg/dscm. The scrubber exit of the
IRF RKS is analogous to the stack of a typical commercial incinerator.  Particulate emission
levels as high as those measured in Tests 1 and 2 would cause a hazardous waste incinerator to
fail a trial burn.

        Scrubber exit flue gas particulate levels were significantly lower, at  11 to 25 mg/dscm,
at 7 percent O2, in the lagoon 8 sludge tests.  These  levels easily meet the hazardous waste
incinerator performance standard.

        As noted in Section 2.1, at the  IRF  the  combustion flue  gas passes through the
secondary APCS downstream of the venturi/packed-column scrubber before being vented to the
atmosphere via the  stack.   At  the  IRF  RKS stack, particulate  levels ranged from 57 to
117 mg/dscm at 7 percent  O2,  in the lagoon 3 sludge tests, and from 7  to 15 mg/dscm  at
7 percent O2, in  the lagoon 8 sludge tests.  Except for Test 3, stack particulate levels were
reduced from scrubber exit  levels.
                    TABLE 33.  FLUE GAS PARTICULATE LEVELS
                                            Flue gas particulate,
                                            mg/dscm at 7% O2
Test
Lagoon 3 sludge
1(10/24/91)
2(10/29/91)
3(10/31/91)
Lagoon 8 sludge
. 4(11/5/91)
5(11/6/91)
6(11/7/91)
Afterburner
exit

43a
53a
456a

46a
29a
29a
Scrubber
exit

266
195
44

22
25
11
Stack

117
59
57

.15
9
7
                aProbe nozzle particulate not recoverable.
                                          52
-------
4.62    HC1 Emissions

        Table 34 summarizes the HC1 levels measured in the flue gas at the three locations
sampled.  Recall that the lagoon 3  sludge contained 3.5 percent (dry basis) chlorine. At this
chlorine content, the chlorine feedrates during the lagoon 3 sludge tests shown in the first row
of Table 34, correspond to the test-specific sludge feedrate. The lagoon 8 sludge contained
<0.1 percent chlorine (dry basis); the corresponding upper-bound chlorine feedrates in Tests 4
through 6 are also given in Table 34.

        The data in Table 34 show  that afterburner exit flue gas HC1 levels ranged from  15 to
50 ppm, dry basis.  The corresponding  HC1 emission rates were 44 to 142 g/hr, significantly
below the chlorine feedrates.  Evidently, much of the lagoon 3 sludge chlorine was discharged
as inorganic chlorides in the incineration kiln ash.

        Scrubber exit HC1 levels were reduced to the 0.2 to 2.8 ppm range in the lagoon 3 sludge
tests, corresponding to scrubber HC1 collection efficiencies of 89 to 99.2 percent.

        Similar results were observed in the lagoon 8 sludge tests. Afterburner exit flue gas HC1
levels ranged from 2.6 to 5.8 ppm. These were reduced to less than detectable at 30 ppb in the
scrubber exit flue  gas.   Corresponding scrubber collection efficiencies were greater  than
99 percent.

        The hazardous waste incinerator performance standard  requires a 99 percent HC1
removal efficiency, if emissions exceed 1.8 kg/hr HC1. The venturi/packed-column scrubber on
the RKS met the 99 percent removal efficiency standard in the five of the six tests.  HC1
emissions were well below the limit in every test.

        Unexplainably, stack gas HC1 levels were higher than scrubber exit HC1 levels in three
of the tests.

4.6.3    Particle Size Distributions

        Table 35 gives the results of the particle size distribution measurements performed at
the afterburner exit.  In performing the afterburner exit  particle  size sampling, much of the
participate collected on the inside  of the sampling nozzle and probe liner, and could not be
recovered.   Consequently, the particle sizing data  in Table 35 should be viewed with caution.
This experience is similar to that encountered in the Method 5 particulate/HCl trains run at the
afterburner exit, as discussed in Section  4.6.1.

        Table 36 summarizes the particle size distribution data  obtained at the scrubber exit
location. These data must also be viewed with caution.  In the lagoon 3 sludge tests, many
impactor stages had very little or  no collected participate.  This problem worsened in the
lagoon 8 sludge tests, which had significantly lower scrubber exit flue gas particulate.  The data
in Table 36 reflect this.  For the tests with fewer than eight particle size data points in  the table,
the missing size points correspond to impactor stages which collected no particulate. No readily
apparent explanation for why some  impactor stages collected very little or no particulate while
others collected measurably higher  levels exists other than negligible to only small amounts of
particulate in the corresponding size range were present in the flue gas.

        With the above cautionary notes, Figure 4 presents the lagoon 3 sludge test data in
Tables 35 and 36 graphically by plotting the cumulative mass percent less than particle diameter
(y-axis)  versus particle diameter (x-axis). Figure 5 presents the corresponding lagoon 8 sludge


                                           53
-------












03
a
i
CO
^C
O
g
R
TT
m
W
pa
2









' »
c""* *""*
^,


/— V
. . **^
<••• ^
-co vo


co in
ju •••-.
E




O
3b
•a

"w
e
i
3





e?
l|


£4
«SI 0^
|jj ?J
3,
j^
i-< ON
£ o1

>~'

Paramet



CN
V





c5
V
VO
V


oo





ON
oo .


SN
oo



drate, g/hr
turner exit



Vd
=1
emission rate,
U
ffi

en
ON
A




O
ON
ON
A
ON
A


cs
ON





o
ON
ON


ON
OO


1
1
bber collection
1 1
CO

en





en
C9
V
oo
1— 1
0


r-
C3





VO
O


OO
o


•o
"ao
concentration,
8


«o en
i—! en




(SJ J-~.
O* O
V V
CM VO
^H en
O CS


d i-5





«
-------
ce
22
o
t»
d
02!





P
in


i
ea

                 t
               It
        •a a
               II
    *
               1
                 I
                 -8
               J .
               it
                                         55
-------
en
s
a
I
tti
1
u
CQ
s
I
I
1 s
"S •«- 4>
1|*
as
w **•
SB
_ a
73 £
Ji "
if
en *
Cumulative
% less than
size
jj |
J §
^ £
a 5
it
•-!
Ijl
it
s g
li 1
as
It

*«^ TM ON C*;
wS i*^ r*5 06
O T-i
                                                    2   2
                                       T-i  O  O
                                                       56
-------
  99.9
 N
 03 98
 C
 CO
.C
 «84
 CO
JD
•*- 50
 iw
•8
 © 16
 Q.
 i
 >   o
s
 3
 Eo.1
O
  0.01
      0.2
                 0.5       1.0       2.0           5.0
                         Particle size (microns)
10.0
                                                                           Tesfl
                                                                            inlet
                                                                           —a—
                                                                           Testa
                                                                            inlet
                                                                             A
                                                                           Tests
                                                                            inlet
                                                                             O
                                                                           Tesfl
                                                                           outlet
                                                                           Tests
                                                                           outlet
                                                                           Tests
                                                                           outlet
20.0
     Figure 4.  Scrubber inlet and outlet flue gas particle size distributions for the
               lagoon 3 sludge tests.
     93
     84
 
-------
 test data.  Had the size distributions been log-normal in nature, the data would have followed
 a straight line. The curvature in the data lines indicated that the particles captured in the
.cascade impactor train were not log-normal distributed.

        The data in Figure 4 show that the afterburner exit size distributions for Tests 1 and 2
 were similar. For all three lagoon 3 sludge tests, the paniculate collected at the scrubber exit
 was larger than that collected at the afterburner exit.

        The data Figure 5 show that the afterburner exit size distributions for Tests 4 and 5
 were similar. As for the lagoon 3 sludge test data, the scrubber exit paniculate was larger than
 the afterburner exit paniculate for the two lagoon 8 sludge tests for which there are scrubber exit
 data.
                                            58
-------
                                     SECTION 5

                           'A      CONCLUSIONS


        A detailed test program was performed at the EPA's IRF to help determine  the
effectiveness  of incineration for treating two contaminated sludges from the Bofors-Nobel
Superfund site in Muskegon, Michigan. These sludges are contaminated with several volatile and
semivolatile organic contaminants,  chiefly methylene chloride, chloroform, benzene, toluene,
azobenzene, benzidine, and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine.  The sludges are also contaminated with
several trace metal contaminants, chiefly barium, cadmium, chromium, and lead. The purpose
of the test program was to evaluate the incinerability of selected site sludges in terms of the
destruction of organic contaminants and the fate of contaminant trace metals.  The specific test
objectives addressed the following questions:

        «    Can incineration effectively destroy the contaminant POHCs to the required DRE
             of 99.99 percent?

        •    Are treated sludges (kiln ash) free of organic contamination?

        «    What are the  nature and concentrations of any organic contaminants in  the
             discharge from a wet scrubber APCS?

        «    What is the distribution of the contaminant trace metals among the incineration
             system discharge streams?

        •    What is the effectiveness of the IRF APCS in collecting particulate and trace
             metals?

        Sludges from lagoon 3 and lagoon 8 were incinerated in the  test program.  Three
incineration tests, under similar incinerator operating conditions, were performed with each of
the two lagoon sludges. All of the tests were performed in the IRF RKS, equipped with the
venturi/packed-column scrubber APCS. Incinerator operation was conducted at a nominal kiln
exit gas temperature of 982°C (1,800°F) with kiln exit flue gas O2 at 8 to 10 percent, and a
nominal afterburner exit gas temperature of 1,204°C (2,200°F) with afterburner exit flue gas O2
of nominally 6 percent.

        Test conclusions in terms of the above questions are as follows:

        •    Greater than 99.99 percent DRE of the POHCs in the lagoon 3  sludge was
             achieved under the incineration conditions tested. This was clearly shown for two
             of the three lagoon 3 sludge POHCs (toluene and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine) in all
             three tests; and for the third POHC (benzene) in two of the three tests.  Method
             PQL limitations allowed establishing only that the benzene DRE was greater than
             99.974 percent in the third test.


                                          59
-------
•    The lagoon 8 sludge POHC, 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine, was not detected in the flue
   •  gas; however, method PQL limitations,  combined  with  low sludge POHC
     concentrations, only allowed firmly  establishing that greater  than 99.974  to
     99.975 percent DRE was achieved

•    For the lagoon 3 sludge, the organic contaminant decontamination effectiveness,
     based on treated sludge  contaminant concentrations, ranged from  at least
     99.989 percent, for 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine, to 99.99994 percent, for benzene and
     toluene

•    Kiln ash from the treatment of the lagoon 3 sludge contained between 5 and
     31 /tg/kg of methylene chloride. No other organic constituent was found in the
     lagoon 3 sludge kiln ash with the exception of:

     —   Toluene, in one test ash, at its PQL

     —   Tricnlorofluoromethane, in the ash from two tests, at its PQL; and in one
          test ash at 20 /tgAg-  This compound's presence is believed to be due to
          sample contamination

     —   1,1,1-trichloroethane, in one test ash, at 10 /tg/kg

     —   Chlorobenzene, in one test ash,  at 100 /tg/kg

•    For the lagoon 8  sludge, the organic contaminant decontamination effectiveness
     was 99.5 percent for toluene (present at 3 mg/kg in the sludge) and greater than
     99.89 percent for 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine (present at 710 mg/kg in the sludge)

•    Kiln ash from the treatment of the lagoon 8 sludge contained about 40 /tg/kg of
     toluene and benzene, about 10 /tg/kg of ethyl benzene and xylenes, and between
     5 and 65 /tg/kg of methylene chloride.  No other organic constituent was found
     in the lagoon 8 sludge kiln  ash.

•    The scrubber liquor contained between 16 and 110 /tg/L of methylene chloride in
     the lagoon 3  sludge tests, and between  20  and  34 /tg/L for the  lagoon 8
     sludge tests.  No other organic constituent was found in any scrubber liquor
     sample.

•    Of the  contaminant trace  metals, barium  and  chromium  were relatively
     nonvolatile.  The kiln ash discharge accounted for nominally 85 to 95 percent or
     •greater of the measured discharge amounts  of  these metals for both sludges
     tested.

•    Of the contaminant trace metals, cadmium and lead exhibited relatively volatile
     behavior.  The kiln ash discharge accounted for only 2 to 3 percent of the lead,
     and 6 percent of the cadmium, in the measured discharge amounts of these metals
     in the lagoon 3 sludge tests. The kiln ash discharge accounted for nominally 40 to
     70 percent  of the lead measured  in discharges  for the lagoon  8  sludge tests;
      cadmium was not present in the lagoon 8 sludge.

•    Lead from the lagoon 3 sludge (2 to 3 percent of the discharged amount in kiln
      ash)  was much more volatile than that from the lagoon 8 sludge  (40 to 70 percent


                                   60
-------
             of the discharged amount in kiln ash).  This may be attributable to different
             sludge chlorine contents; the lagoon 3 sludge contained chlorine, while the lagoon
             8 sludge did not. Significantly increased lead volatility in the presence of chlorine
             during incineration, as observed here, has been documented in past work13'14.

        •    Mass balance closures for the sludge contaminant trace metals, barium, cadmium,
             chromium, and lead, ranged from 42 to 107 percent, with the exception of lead in
             one test in which cross-test contamination is suspected to have occurred

        •    Wet scrubber apparent collection efficiencies for chrorr^um were generally greater
             than about 55 percent.  Lead apparent collection efficiencies were greater than
             76 percent for two of the three lagoon  8  sludge tests and perhaps  as high as
             66 percent for the third; they were lower  (50 percent or less) in the lagoon 3
             sludge tests. Cadmium apparent collection efficiencies in the lagoon 3 sludge tests
             were uniformly low, 38 percent or less. Barium apparent collection efficiencies
             were quite variable.

        •    Low collection efficiencies for cadmium and lead, combined with their volatile
             behavior in the incinerator, resulted in cadmium and lead levels in the scrubber
             exit flue gas of the lagoon 3 sludge tests of 153 to 206 jig/dscm, for cadmium, and
             4,420 to 6,180 /ig/dscm, for lead

        •    Neither of the sludges tested, nor the kiln  ash resulting from their incineration,
             would be  classified as  TC  hazardous  waste based  on  leachable metals
             concentrations

        •    Scrubber  liquor  metal concentrations  were  generally  below  TCLP  limits.
             However, the unfiltered scrubber liquor from each lagoon 3 sludge test and from
             the first lagoon 8 test had lead concentrations above TCLP limits.   The TCLP
             leachate  of a  composite lagoon  3  sludge  test  scrubber  liquid had lead
             concentration below its TCLP limit.

        •    Scrubber  exit  paniculate levels were low  for  the lagoon 8  sludge tests at
             25 mg/dscm, or less, at 7 percent  O2.  Scrubber  exit particulate  levels were
             significantly higher in the lagoon 3 sludge tests—195 and 266 mg/dscm at 7 percent
             O2 for two of the lagoon 3 sludge tests. These values exceed the hazardous waste
             incinerator performance standard of 180 mg/dscm at 7 percent O2.

        •    Scrubber HC1 collection efficiencies were 99 percent or greater for  all but one
             lagoon 3 sludge test; this  efficiency meets  the hazardous  waste  incinerator
             performance standard.  HC1 emission rates were acceptable during every test.

        The test results suggest that incineration under the conditions tested represents an
effective treatment option for the lagoon 8 sludge. Substantial sludge organic decontamination
was achieved; the POHC was not detected in the flue gas and particulate and HC1 emissions
were low and in compliance with performance standards.

        Incineration also appears to be an effective treatment option for the lagoon 3 sludge.
Substantial organic decontamination was achieved and the POHC DRE standard was met. A
wet scrubber APCS of the type tested  may not, however, be an appropriate  choice for air
pollution control. While HC1 emissions were acceptable, particulate emissions were greater than
those allowed.by the incinerator  performance standards.   In addition, cadmium and lead


                                          61
-------
collection efficiencies were low, resulting in cadmium emission levels in the 153 to 206 /ig/dscm
range, and lead emission levels in the 4,420 to 6,180 jug/dscm range. Furthermore, the unfiitered
scrubber liquor discharge exceeded the TCLP limit for lead and approached the limit for
cadmium (scrubber liquor filtrate concentrations may be below these limits).  If a wet scrubber
APCS is used, incineration at a kiln temperature lower than the 982 °C (1,800 °F) temperature
tested might be warranted.   A lower kiln temperature would likely reduce the amount of
cadmium and lead volatilized and carried out of the kiln in the combustion gas.

        As  discussed in Section 6, all measurement precision, accuracy, and completeness
objectives were met.  All samples were analyzed with^p method time limits, with the exception
of the scrubber liquor matrix spike and spike duplicate samples, which were extracted 13 days
after  the extract hold time  had expired.  No adverse effects on test data quality resulted,
however. All measurement MDL or PQL objectives were met, with the exception of the flue gas
MDL for several metals. Only test conclusions for arsenic and barium were affected.  Arsenic
was not detected in any flue gas sample, although at an MDL higher than planned. Flue gas
barium could not be quantitated to the level planned because it was present in the both the
multiple metals train filter and impinger changing solution blanks.

        In a technical systems review of the IRF laboratory operations, the analytical records
for the  test  program were  reviewed.  A few concerns regarding the semivolatile organic
constituent analyses were raised. These concerns are not believed to have affected test program
conclusions,  and corrective actions have been implemented.
                                          62
-------
                                     SECTION 6

                                QUALITY ASSURANCE


        This test program was carried out as outlined in the test plan for the program15.  The
QA aspects of the program were carried out in accordance with the quality assurance project
plan (QAPP)16 for the program.  Except as noted in the following discussion in this section, all
tests were performed in accordance with the procedures documented in the test plan and QAPP.

        All samples analyzed to obtain the data reported in this report were taken at the IRF
by members of the IRF operating staff.  All samples were collected and/or recovered in
accordance with the methods appropriate to their eventual analysis.

        After appropriate preservation, the samples were relinquished to  the custody of the
onsite Sample Custodian. The Sample Custodian subsequently directed the splitting of samples
and their transport to the appropriate laboratories for  analysis.  The sample chain-of-custody
procedures described in the QAPP for these tests were followed.  No compromise in sample
integrity occurred, with the exception of the breakage, in transit, of several Method 0030 sorbent
trap samples, as discussed later in this section.

        For this test program, the critical measurements identified in the QAPP included flue
gas O2 and CO concentrations and test sample trace metal, semivolatile organic constituent, and
volatile organic constituent analyses, and flue gas HC1 and particulate measurements. The QA
efforts performed to ensure that data quality is known for the particulate measurements involved
adherence to Reference Method procedures. No deviations from the QAPP occurred in these
measurements.  Hence,  these measurements are not discussed further in this section.  Other
analyses performed in the program (i.e., proximate and ultimate analysis of sludge feed samples)
were identified in the QAPP as not critical. Accordingly, these analyses are not discussed in this
section.

        The QA efforts performed to  ensure that the data  quality is known for  the CEM
measurements  also  involved  adherence   to  Reference  Method  procedures and  CEM
manufacturers' specifications. The specific QA procedures included calibrating each CEM before
and after each test using a zero and a certified span gas. Tables 37 through 45 summarize the
pre- and posttest zero and span gas checks for each CEM employed.  Instrument drift over each
test period is  also noted in the tables as  both absolute drift and percentage of span gas
concentration.

        Numerous QA procedures were followed to assess the data quality of the laboratory
analytical measurements performed in the test program. These included blank sample analyses,
duplicate analyses, and matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) sample analyses.
Method blank samples were analyzed for all sample matrices for which logical matrix'blanks
could be prepared.
                                          63
-------
          TABLE 37. KILN EXIT GAS O2 MONITOR CALIBRATION DATA
Zero check
Reading, %O2
Test Pretest
1 0.8
2 0.7
3 0.7
4 -0.6
5 -0.6
6 -03
Posttest
0.6
0.8
0.7
-0.6
-0.6
-0.4
Drift
%O2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
% of span"
1.6
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.5
Span
Reading, %O2
Pretest
11.9
20.2
20.6
20.8
20.0
20.4
Posttest
11.9
20.5
20.4
20.6
19.7
20.2
check

Drift
%O2
0.0
03
-0.2
-0.2
-03
-03
% of span8
0.0
1.5
-1.0
-1.0
-1.5
-1.0
"Span gas for Test 1 was 1236% of O2 due to nationwide shortage of higher concentration span gas. Span gas for
 Tests 2 and 3 was 20.10%, and for Tests 4, 5, and 6 was 19.95% O2.
     TABLE 38.  AFTERBURNER EXIT GAS O2 MONITOR CALIBRATION DATA

Zero
Reading, %O2
Test Pretest
1 -0.4
2 -0.4
3 -0.4
4 -0.4
5 -0.4
6 -0.4
Posttest
-0.4
-0.5
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
check

Drift
%O2
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
% of spana
0.0
-0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Span
Reading, %O2
Pretest
12.1
20.1
20.5
20.8
19.8
19.8
Posttest
12.0
20.2
203
20.2
19.7
19.9
check

Drift
%O2
-0.1
0.1
-0.2
-0.6
-0.1
0.1
% of span*
-0.8
0.5
-1.0
-3.0
-0.5
0.5
"Span gas for Test 1 was 1236% of O2 due to nationwide shortage of higher concentration span gas. Span gas for
 Tests 2 and 3 was 20.10%, and for Tests 4, 5, and 6 was 19.95% O2.
                                         64
-------
        TABLE 39.  SCRUBBER EXIT GAS O2 MONITOR CALIBRATION DATA

Zero
Reading, %O2
Test Pretest
1 0.1
2 0.2
3 0.2
4 0.1
5 0.1
6 0.2
Posttest
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
check

Drift
%O2
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.0
-0.1
% of span*
0.0
-0.5
-0.5
0.0
0.0
-0.5

Span
Reading, %O2
Pretest
12.9
213.
21.7
22.0
19.2
19.7
Posttest
12.6
21.7
21.0
21.7
20.7
20.2
check

Drift
%O2
-03
-5.5
-0.7
-03
1.5
0.5"
% of span*
-2.4
-27.4
-3.5
-1.5
7.5
2.5
aSpan gas for Test 1 was 1236% of O2 due to nationwide shortage of higher concentration span gas. Span gas for
 Tests 2 and 3 was 20.10%, and for Tests 4, 5, and 6 was 19.95% O2.
             TABLE 40.  STACK GAS O2 MONITOR CALIBRATION DATA

Zero
Reading, %O2
Test Pretest
1 03
2 03
3 03
4 03
5 03
6 0.3
Posttest
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
check

Drift
%O2
-03
-03
-03
-03
-0.3
-03
% of span*
-2.4
-1.5
-1.5
-1.5
-1.5
-1.5

Span
Reading, %O2
Pretest
13.5
, 21.5
19.0
21.0
203
19.5
Posttest
13.8
21.0
20.5
22.0
21.0
19.0
check

Drift
%O2
03
-0.5
1.5
1.0
0.7
-0.5
% of span*
2.4
-2.5
7.5
5.0
3.5
-2.5
"Span gas for Test 1 was 12.36% of O2 due to nationwide shortage of higher concentration span gas. Span gas for
 Tests 2 and 3 was 20.10%, and for Tests 4, 5, and 6 was 19.95% O2.
                                          65
-------
   TABLE 41.  SCRUBBER EXIT GAS CO2 MONITOR CALIBRATION DATA
Zero check
Reading, %CO2
Test Pretest Posttest
1 0.0
2 0.0
3 0.0
4 0.1
5 0.1
6 0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
Drift
%CO2
0.0
0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.1
0.1
%of
span*
0.0
0.7
0.0
-0.7
0.7
0.7
Reading,
Pretest
15.5
15.7
15.5
15.4
153
. 153
Span check
%CO2
Posttest
15.5
15.7
15.5
153
15.2
15.4
Drift
%C02
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
0.1
%of
span*
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.7
-0.7
0.7
"Span gas was 1530% CO2.
TABLE 42.
STACK GAS
CO2 MONITOR CALIBRATION
Zero check
Reading,
Test Pretest
1 0.0
2 0.0
3 0.0
4 -0.1
5 0.0
6 0.0
%CO2
Posttest
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Drift
%CO2
0.0
0.0 .
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
%of
span*
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
DATA

Span check
Reading, %CO2
Pretest
15.7
15.8
15.7
15.5
153
153
Posttest
15.4
15.8
15.5
15.4
15.2
15.4
Drift
%CO2
-03
0.0
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
%of
span*
-2.0
0.0
-13
-0.7
-0.7
0.0
•Span gas was 1530% CO2.
                                66
-------
     TABLE 43. SCRUBBER EXIT GAS CO MONITOR CALIBRATION DATA
Test
1
2
3
4
5-
6
"Span

Reading,
Pretest
6
0
0
3
-1
1
gas was 394
Zero check
ppm CO
Posttest ppm
1
1
1
2
3
8
ppm CO.
TABLE 44. STACK
Test
1
2
3
4
5
6

Reading,
Pretest
0
0
1
0
0
0
Zero check
ppm CO

Drift
CO
-5
1
1
-1
4
7



%of
span*
-13
03
03
-03
1.0
1.8


Reading,
Pretest
386
386
393
393
397
397

Span
ppm CO
Posttest
387
389
389
393
401
412

GAS CO MONITOR CALIBRATION

Drift
Posttest ppm CO
2 "
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
1


Span
Reading, ppm CO
%of
span*
0.5
03
0.0
03
03
03
Pretest
384
385
384
386
385
385
Posttest
383
385
381
386
384
388
check
Drift
%of
ppm CO span"
1 03
3 0.8
-4 -1.0
0 0.0
4 1.0
15 3.8

DATA
check
Drift
%of
ppm CO span"
-1 -03
0 0.0
-3 -0.8
0 0.0
-1 -03
3 0.8
"Span gas was 394 ppm CO.
                                 67
-------
       TABLE 45.  SCRUBBER EXIT GAS NOX MONITOR CALIBRATION DATA

                    Zero check                                  Span check
       Reading, ppm NOX            Drift            Reading, ppm NOX            Drift
                                      %of
 Test   Pretest   Posttest       ppm NOX   span*	Pretest   Posttest	ppm NOX   span*
1
2
3
4
5
6
-12
-12
-12
-12
-10
-3
-9
-11
-11
-10
-4
-2
3
1
1
2
6
1
1.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
3.0
0.5
184
185
192
190
200
197
199
191
201
212
207
205
15
6
9
22
7
8
7.5
3.0
4.5
10.9
3.5
4.0
 "Span gas was 201 ppm NOX.


        In  addition, the  analytical records for the analyses performed in  the  IRF onsite
laboratory were reviewed during a technical systems review (TSR) of the laboratory's operations
conducted  on January 29 and 30, 1992,  at the direction of the RREL Quality Assurance
Manager. Findings from this review are discussed in appropriate subsections of this section.

       ' Results of QA procedures performed for the critical laboratory analytical measurements
are discussed, by analyte group, in the following subsections.

6.1     VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT ANALYSES

        Thirty  solid/liquid  samples  were analyzed for volatile  organic  constituents  by
Method 8240. Included in this number were two method field blanks, six trip blanks, and three
pairs of MS/MSD samples.  In addition, 50 Method 0030 (VOST) samples were  collected or
prepared for analysis by Method 5040. Included in this number were five blanks,  three trip
blanks, and six matrix spike samples. All volatile organic analyses were performed in the Acurex
Environmental laboratories in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

        Table 46 summarizes the sample collection and analysis dates for the sludge feed, kiln
ash, and scrubber liquor  samples.  As shown, all samples were analyzed within the required
method hold time. Table 47 summarizes the collection and analysis dates for the Method 0030
samples. Again,  all samples were analyzed within the required method hold time.  Table 47
indicates that 10 of the 50 VOST samples were broken during shipment or analysis.  However,
40 of the 50, or 80 percent, were successfully analyzed.  The completeness objective for this
measurement was 70 percent, which was met.

        None of the trip  blank samples noted in Table 46 contained any detectable volatile
organic constituents. Both scrubber liquor method blanks contained methylene chloride at 36
and 51  /tg/L; this was the only volatile organic found in these samples.  The scrubber liquor
method blanks consisted  of samples taken of the recirculating scrubber liqu°r Just before the
start of sludge feeding for Tests 5 and 6.  Given  this,  the scrubber liquor volatile organic
constituent concentrations presented and discussed in Section 4.2 were not corrected for these
blank levels.
                                          68
-------
TABLE 46. VOLATILE ORGANIC SLUDGE FEED, KILN ASH, AND SCRUBBER
        LIQUOR SAMPLE ANALYSIS HOLD TIMES
Sample
Sludge feed
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
Duplicate analysis
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 2
Kiln ash
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
Duplicate analysis
Test5
Test 6
Duplicate analysis
Scrubber liquor
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
Test 5
Duplicate analysis
Test 6
Duplicate analysis
Method blanks .
Scrubber liquor 1
Scrubber liquor 2
Trip blanks
Trip blank 1
Trip blank 2
Trip blank 3
Trip blank 4
Trip blank 5
Trip blank 6
Matrix spike samples
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 2
sludge feed
Test 4 kiln ash
Spike duplicate
Test 6 scrubber liquor
Spike duplicate
Method requirement
Collection
date

10/23/91
10/28/91
10/28/91
11/1/91
ll/i/91
11/1/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91
11/7/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/7/91
11/7/91

11/6/91
11/7/91

10/28/91
10/28/91
11/4/91
11/4/91
11/5/91
11/11/91


11/1/91
11/5/91
li/5/91
11/7/91
11/7/91

Analysis Analysis hold
date time, days

10/29/91
11/7/91
11/7/91
11/13/91
11/13/91
11/13/91

11/7/91
11/7/91
11/7/91
11/18/91
11/18/91
11/18/91
11/18/91
11/18/91

10/29/91
11/7/91
11/7/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/12/91

11/12/91
11/12/91

10/29/91
10/29/91
11/7/91
11/7/91'
11/13/91
11/12/91


11/14/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/12/91


6
10
10
12
12
12

13
9
7
13
13
12
11
11

5
9
7
7
6
6
5
5

6
5

1
1
3
3
8
1


13
7
7
5
5
14
                             69
-------
TABLE 47. METHOD 0030 TRAIN SAMPLE ANALYSIS HOLD TIMES

Sample
Collection
date
Analysis Analysis hold
date time, days
Afterburner exit Method 0030 samples
Test 1
Test 2
Tests
Test 4
TestS
Test 6
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
10/24/91
10/24/91
10/24/91
10/29/91
10/29/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
10/31/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/7/91
11/7/91
11/7/91
11/11/91
11/11/91
11/6/91
12/5/91
12/3/91
11/26/91
12/3/91
12/4/91
12/5/91
12/11/91
12/11/91
Broken
Broken
12/11/91
12/11/91
12/16/91
12/12/91
Broken
18
18
13
37
35
28
33
34
35
36
36
NAa
NA
35
35
39
35
NA
Scrubber exit Method 0030 samples
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
Method
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
requirement
10/24/91
10/24/91
10/24/91
10/29/91
10/29/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
10/31/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/5/91

11/6/91
11/6/91
Broken
12/4/91
12/5/91
12/4/91
12/5/91
12/5/91
Broken
12/11/91
12/11/91
Broken

aNA = Not applicable due to breakage.
13
13
NA
36
37
36
35
35
NA
36
36
NA
42
(continued)
                          70
-------
                        TABLE 47.  (continued)
Sample
Scrubber exit Method 0030 samples
(continued)
Test 5 1st trap pair
V» 2nd trap pair
'V 3rd trap pair
Test 6 1st trap pair
2nd trap pair
3rd trap pair
Field blank traps
Field blank 1
Field blank 2
Field blank 3
Field blank 4
Field blank 5
Trip blank traps
Trip blank 1
Trip blank 2
Trip blank 3
Matrix spike traps
Matrix spike 1
Matrix spike 2
Matrix spike 3
Matrix spike 4
Matrix spike 5
Matrix spike 6
Method requirement
Collection '
date

11/6/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/7/91
11/7/91
11/7/91

10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

10/28/91
11/4/91
11/11/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

Analysis Analysis hold
date time, days

12/12/91
12/12/91
12/12/91
12/12/91
12/16/91
12/12/91

Broken
11/26/91
12/9/91
12/9/91
Broken

Broken
11/11/91
12/9/91

11/6/91
11/27/91
11/27/91
12/9/91
12/9/91
Broken


36
36
36
35
39
35

NAa
26
34
33
NA

NA
7
30

13
29
27
34
33
NA
42
aNA = Not applicable due to breakage.
                                 71
-------
       Table 48 summarizes the volatile  organic constituent concentrations measured in
Method 0030 field and trip blank samples.  As shown, all blank samples generally contained
significant levels of trichlorofluoromethane, methylene chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, benzene,
and toluene. The universal experience has been that Method 0030 train traps can easily become
contaminated with any volatile organic compound present in an environment the traps are placed
in, despite proper care in packaging for shipment and storage prior to sampling and between
sampling and analysis.

       As  noted,  in Section 4.2, trichlorofluoromethane is  a  common refrigerant  and
i$yyurethane foam blowing agent.  The levels found in all Method 0030 traps, blanks .included,
may have come from ambient laboratory levels arising from leaking refrigeration or air
conditioning equipment,  or from the insulation in the coolers used to ship samples.  As also
noted in Section 4.2, methylene chloride is the most common organic analysis laboratory solvent.
The levels found in all Method 0030 samples, blanks included, are likely from ambient laboratory
air. The  source of the 1,1,1-trichloroethane contaminant is not readily apparent.
       TABLE 48. VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATIONS
                  METHOD 0030 TRAIN BLANK SAMPLES
IN
Concentration, ng/trap
Field blanks
Constituent
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene chloride
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Benzene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Xylenes
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
All others
2
m>c
ND
3,400
310
530
860
690
ND
280
ND
34
26
97
ND
ND
ND
3
ND
ND
48,000
70
4,400
770
ND
ND
280
100
ND
110
140
83
21
ND
4
140
ND
7,400
130
850
930
530
ND
220
ND
750
220
990
ND
ND
ND
Trip
2
ND
30
16,000
61
2,000
360
410
ND
150
ND
37
ND
ND
23
ND
ND
blanks
3
ND
, 210
49,000
410
100
1,500
650
21
640
100
ND
110
340
870
210
ND
Mean",
all blanks
28
48
24,800
196
1,580
884
456
4 •
314
40 .
164
93
313
195
46
0
Mean f
196
294
84,200
615
6,210
1,980
1,200
29
824
187
1,040
325
1,380
1,210
293
0
  'Less than PQL set to zero.
  ""So- = 3 standard deviations.
  °ND - Not detected at a PQL of 20 ng/trap.
                                         72
-------
        Tenax, the Method 0030 sorbent, is a crosslinked styrene polymer. Benzene and toluene
are likely solvents used in its manufacture. These two compounds may be slowly released over
time from the resin itself.  The universal experience has been that benzene and toluene are
almost always found in  Method 0030 samples, and their levels increase with time (trap age).
That four of five method blank types were analyzed  between 26 and 34 days after their
preparation  is consistent with the significant benzene and toluene levels found. The method
blank analyzed 7 days after preparation had lower levels of both compounds.

        Based  on the  abnormally high  trichlorofluoromethane,  methylene  chloride, and
1,1,1-trichloroethane levels found  in this test's M%iod 0030 samples, sample  storage and
packaging for shipment procedures have been reexamined.  The corrective action has been
specifying a different means of isolating individual trap pairs in metal culture tubes  and to
increase the quantity of charcoal absorbent in the container (a "paint can") into which trap
container culture tubes are placed.

        As required by Method 5040, the paired t-test was used to determine whether the field
blanks were  different from the trip blanks with respect to the constituent concentrations noted
in Table 48.  The hypothesis that field blanks were the same as trip blanks could not be rejected
at a level of  significance of 0.1.  In other words, there is less than 90-percent certainty that field
blanks were different from trip blanks.  Thus, based on this test, all blanks were considered
equivalent, and the mean blank concentration and its standard deviation over all blanks were
calculated for all constituents found in any blank.  The mean blank concentration and the mean-
plus-three-standard-deviations concentration are also shown in Table 48.  A sample concentration
was not  considered different from a blank if the measured sample concentration for a constituent
was less than the mean-plus-three-standard-deviations concentration. In these cases, the  sample
concentration was assumed to be less than the measured sample concentration. Samples with
constituent   concentrations greater  than   the  mean-blank-plus-three-standard-deviations
concentration were blank-corrected by subtracting the mean blank concentration.  This approach
was used in reducing the Method 0030 data and underlies the flue gas volatile organic constituent
concentrations presented in Tables 20 and 21, and discussed in Section 4.2.

        Table 49 summarizes the volatile organic constituent measurement DQOs for precision,
accuracy, and completeness. Table 50 lists the PQL objectives for the volatile organic constituent
measurements and notes the PQLs achieved.  Instrument MDLs were not used in this program;
PQLs were  used  instead..  The PQL was the constituent concentration in  the  lowest level
calibration standard, adjusted for any methanol extract dilution required for the test sludge feed
samples. As shown in Table 50, the PQL objective was achieved for all constituents in the kiln
ash, scrubber liquor, and flue gas sample matrices. The methanol extracts of both  sludge feeds
required substantial  dilution prior to  analysis, owing  to  their high volatile organic content.
Accordingly, the matrix-adjusted PQLs achieved were correspondingly higher  than the PQL
objectives that apply to low-level materials.

        Measurement accuracy was assessed by analyzing MS and MSD samples for the sludge
feed, kiln ash, and scrubber liquor sample matrices; and by analyzing several MS Method 0030
traps. All samples were spiked with surrogate standards prior to analysis, and surrogate recovery
was measured as another indicator of measurement accuracy.

        Results of the MS/MSD sample analyses for the sludge feed, kiln ash, and scrubber
liquor matrices are summarized in Table 51.  Five target analytes were spiked into MS/MSD
samples. Of the 25 spike recoveries achieved, 23, or 92 percent, were within the compound-
specific  DQO ranges noted in Table 51.  As the completeness objective for this measurement
                                          73
-------
       TABLE 49.  VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT MEASUREMENT DQOs
   Measurement
     parameter
                    Measurement/
                   analytical method
                     Precision, % Accuracy, Completeness,
Reference    Conditions  USD or RPD    %         %
Volatile organic      Purge and trap,
constituents in sludge  GC/MS
feed and kiln ash
samples
Volatile organic      Purge and trap,
constituents in       GC/MS
scrubber liquor
samples
                                   SW-846,     Methanol
                                   Method 8240 extraction of
                                              'sludge feed
                                  . SW-846,     NAb
                                  '•Method 8240
                                  ' *V
Volatile organic
                  Method 0030
SW-846,
          NA
                         50     D to 273a      70
                         50     Dto273a      70
50     D to 273"      70
constituents in flue    sampling, GC/MS    Method 5040
gas
                  analysis
*D = Detected; compound-specific acceptance criteria taken from Table 6 of Method 8240.
      Not applicable.

       TABLE 50.  VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT MEASUREMENT PQLs:
                   OBJECTIVES AND ACHIEVED
Matrix
Lagoon 3 sludge, drums 1, 3, and 4, pg/kg
Acetone
Group 2a
All others b
Lagoon 8 sludge and lagoon 3 sludge,
drum 2 ftg/kg
Acetone
Group 2a
All others'5
Kiln ash, fig/kg
Acetone
Group 2a
All others'3
Scrubber liquor, /ig/L
Acetone
Group 2a
All others'*
Flue gas, /ig/dscm
Acetone
Group 2a
All others'5

DQO

100
10
5

100
10
5

100
10
5

100
10
5

50
5
2
PQL
Achieved

1,250,000
125,000
62,500

12,500
1,250
625

100
10
5

100
10
5

1
1
1
           "Group 2: bromomethane, chloroethane, 2-chloroethylvinyl ether,
            chloromethane, and vinyl chloride.
           bAll other compounds in Table 14.
                                           74
-------
    TABLE 51. VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT RECOVERIES FROM MATRIX
               SPIKE SLUDGE FEED, KILN ASH, AND SCRUBBER LIQUOR SAMPLES
                                          Spike recovery, %
        Sample
1,1-DichIoro-
   ethene
Benzene
Trichloro-
  ethene
Toluene
Chloro-
benzene
DQO
 Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite       20
 2 sludge feed

 Test 4 kiln ash

  MS                       15
  MSB                      15
  RPD, %                   -0

 Test 6 scrubber liquor
                128
                 60
                120
                 67
            127
             65
             69
              6
              76
             102
             114
              11
            122
             99
            102
              3
           50
MS
MSD
RPD, %
DQO
60
45
29
D to 234a
97
112
14
37 to 151
104
119
13
71 to 157
89
91
2
47 to 150
100
112
11
37 to 160


50

 aD = Detected.
was 70 percent, the accuracy objective for the measurement, as determined by MS recovery, was
met.

        Table 52 summarizes the results of the Method 0030 MS sample analyses. Of the 25
spike recoveries noted in  the table, 19, or 76 percent,  were within the compound-specific
recovery DQO range. This is greater than the 70-percent completeness objective, so the accuracy
DQO for volatile organic constituent determination in flue gas samples as measured by MS
recovery was also met.

        Table 53 summarizes the surrogate recoveries achieved in the analyses of sludge feed,
kiln ash, and scrubber liquor samples, and compares these recoveries to the DQOs, which are
the acceptance limits documented in Table 8 of Method 82405.  As shown  in the table,  of
96 recovery measurements,  87, or 92 percent, were within compound-specific recovery DQO
ranges.  This exceeds the 70-percent completeness objective, so the surrogate recovery accuracy
objective for these sample matrices was met.

        Table 54 summarizes the surrogate recoveries achieved in the analyses of Method 0030
samples. Two sets of surrogates were used for Method 0030 samples.  The field surrogates noted
in Table 54 were spiked onto the Method 0030 traps before the traps were used for sampling.
The spiking level was 30 ng per sample.  The laboratory surrogates noted in the table were
spiked just before the traps were analyzed. The recovery DQO range established for the field
surrogates corresponds to the acceptance criteria for benzene, toluene, and ethyl benzene listed
in Table 6 of Method 82405.
                                         75
-------
    TABLE 52.  VOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT RECOVERIES FROM MATRIX
               SPIKE METHOD 0030 SAMPLES

                                      Spike recovery, %
1,1-DichIoro-
Sample ethene
Matrix spike 1
Matrix spike 2
Matrix spike 3
Matrix spike 4
Matrix spike 5
%RSD
DQO
54
47
16
85
63
48
12 to 234
Benzene
114
331
167
117
245
48
37 to 151
Trichloro-
ethene
75
96
54
35
70
35
71 to 157
Toluene
94
96
90
168
133
29
47 to 150
Chloro-
benzene • DQO
88
113
48
108
103
29 50
37 to 160
        Of the 120 laboratory surrogate recoveries noted in Table 54, 94, or 78 percent, were
within the  compound-specific recovery DQO ranges.   Similarly, 96 of 120 field surrogate
recoveries achieved, or 80 percent, were within  the recovery DQO range.  As both of these
acceptable recovery percentages exceed the 70-percent measurement completeness objective, the
surrogate recovery measurement accuracy objective for the flue gas matrix was also met.

        Volatile organic constituent measurement precision was assessed by analyzing sludge
feed, kiln ash, and scrubber liquor samples in duplicate. In addition, MS/MSD sample pairs of
kiln ash and scrubber liquor were analyzed, and  five Method 0030 MS samples were analyzed
as further measures of measurement precision.

        Table 55 summarizes the results of the duplicate analyses of sludge feed, kiln ash, and
scrubber liquor samples. Of the 13 definitive RPDs noted in the table, all 13 met the precision
DQO. Thus, the volatile organic measurement precision DQO, as determined by the RPD of
duplicate sample analyses, was met for the sludge feed, kiln ash, and scrubber liquor sample
matrices.

        Table 51 notes the results of the MS/MSD sample analyses for kiln ash and scrubber
liquor samples.  Of the 10 RPD determinations noted, 9, or 90 percent, met the RPD DQO.
Table 6-7 summarizes the results of the Method 0030 MS sample analyses. All 6 of the % USD
determinations for these replicate sample analyses met the precision DQO. As the measurement
completeness objective was 70 percent, the precision objective, as measured by MS/MSD or
replicate MS sample analyses, was met for the kiln ash, scrubber liquor,  and flue gas matrices.

62     SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT ANALYSES

        Forty-four samples were analyzed for semivolatile organic constituents by Method 8270.
Included in this number were seven method blank samples and four pairs of MS/MSD samples.
All sample extractions and analyses were performed in the onsite laboratories at the IRF.

        Table 56 summarizes the sample collection, extraction, and analysis dates for all test
program samples analyzed for semivolatile organics. As shown in the table, all samples, _with the

                                         76
-------
TABLE 53. VOLATILE ORGANIC SURROGATE RECOVERIES FROM SLUDGE,
         KILN ASH, AND SCRUBBER LIQUOR SAMPLES
Sample
Sludge feed
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
Duplicate analysis
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 2
Kiln ash
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 4
Duplicate analysis
TestS
Test 6
Duplicate analysis
Scrubber liquor
Test 1
Test 2
Test3
Test 4
Test 5
Duplicate analysis
Test 6
Duplicate analysis
Method blanks
Scrubber liquor 1
Scrubber liquor 2
Trip blanks
Trip blank 1
Trip blank 2
Trip blank 3
Trip blank 4
Trip blank 5
Trip blank 6
Matrix spike samples
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 2 sludge feed
Test 4 kiln ash
Spike duplicate
Test 6 scrubber liquor
Spike duplicate
DQO
Aqueous liquids
Solids and sludges

!,2-DicfaIoroethane-d4

76
73
118

99
110
76
97
165
102
118
118

100
120
103
74
109
110
111
118

105
102

106
106
104
105
101
94

63
111
126
116
66

76 to 114 '"
70 to 121
Recovery, %
Toluene-ds

105
103
100

116
111
99
111~
109
113
113
108

97
90
93
100
106
103
91
102

102
101

99
99
99
102
108
95

100
111
108
94
83

88 to 110
81 to 117

Bromofluorobenzene

99
110
104

108
84
92
106
100
95
101
98

97
98
100
107
105
103
96
101

102
89

102
102
95
99
100
94

112
100
101
98
110

86 to 115
74 to 121
                             77
-------





WD
fv*i
j
s

CQ
O
rn
§
Q
O
1
Ei2
s
S
8
§
b3
o
o
yj
3
U3
O
k«Mi

s
o
a
g
2
g
^#
in
a
ca
is















Recovery, %
















.2
a
M

a
M
•a
OT*
E




en
«
2
V2
^•j
1
£
C9




1
0)
Q


O)
e
n
2


o>
B
1
O
t.
ii
i- e
1*
CP
oo
"O
B
































o
s
o


2
*i
i
1
\oo\o\  \ovovo
Ot>O  O
                                                             o
                                                             VO
                                                      oo »n   o
                                                             o
                                    Of>
                                                      flf)
                    CS'—''-1'   TH-rH  ^^^—I  Tf
                                                             O
                                                             •«*•
                                                      \O t*)   O
                                                      co *-<   *S
                                           OO\
                                                      ^
                                                         OO

                                                             s
OVO'-i
   VO'-i  c^^1^-
   OOi-"O^H
                             ^Ov  OO  VOOO
                                                      OO
                                                         o\   o
                                                              4H»
                                                              V-H
                                                              oo
                             r-o
                             vooo
                                                      o o\
                                                   en
                                                  »
                                                  'S.
                                                   i
                                                   S3
1S.
  -i-
     .fa
      S.
 u
!
  -
t-  -^» £J   W
-fa .S3  b. •- .!-   U. •-
 S.g.?.S,g.  IS.

       &§•§•
       t-i -4**
   'S
      '
                                                             Q
                     78
-------





















^
i
1
s
"7
u?
fe3
^j
09

H




























V
1
HJi
*




















1



S
en
ts
a»4
fa








en
. I
|
3
V3
e
I
e
A

«






g
i
a

4>
e
e
o
z



e
5
u
O

0 «
S S
•55 Q)
1*
«
00
"7

1
S
3


i
2 j?

•s 1
« «B
"9 JS
' '*"*




"a.
S
a

O
VO
T— 1
vo_ **


S
T— t
THT-HTH T-H^ ^S^OO OOOC^ OT-^C^ O
T-I T— 1 T-l T— IT-IT-IT-HT-HI—  U U U U "" -5! --3 -S Z,
ggH H H H • H .S tt* fr, fc • O*
03 vSi ' fa O
^_^
1
•s
c
^






































79
-------


















'g
1
"c
s
_J
TABLE 5<
























1
I
pj










en
S
1

t«
«n
fmm
^S
3
fa








£
i
j-<
s
g
Laborafc

1
5


0)
e
e
o


0>
j8
u
O
I
1 «
G3 2j
o S
||
M

•^
e
o>
s
1
i
Jl
M
"A
g
C3
cc




, O 0
^




cs S
^H d



o\ S
T— 1 T— 1



oo c\
T— 1 T— 1


.
en w>
o \o
T— 1 T— 1






«3
f ^^
JS 3 3
.& "c "c
&3
                        o
                        VO
                        \—t

                         o


                        o





                        o
                        VO


                         o


                        o

                         O

                         •«


                        T— 1

                        00

  ,

 2   "-1

2
      C3
                    CU
&
Q
                   80
-------
   TABLE 55. VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS PRECISION FROM DUPLICATE
             SAMPLE ANALYSES
Concentration
Sample
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
sludge feed
Analysis, mg/kg
Duplicate analysis, mg/kg
RPD, %
Test 4 kiln ash
Analysis, /tg/kg
Duplicate analysis, /ig/kg
RPD, %
Test 6 kiln ash
Analysis, /ig/kg
Duplicate analysis, /ig/kg
RPD, %
Test 5 scrubber liquor
Analysis, /tg/L
Duplicate analysis, jig/L
RPD, %
Test 6 scrubber liquor
Analysis, /tg/L
Duplicate analysis, /ig/L
RPD, %
Methylene
chloride

<0.63
<0.63
___a

75
55
31

6
4
40

34
34
0

20
19
5 '
Benzene

<0.63
<0.63

42
42
0

-39
38
3

<5
<5

<5
<5
Toluene

3.5
3.6
3

37
37
0

39
36
8

<5
<5

<5
<5
Ethyl
benzene

<0.63
<0.63

13
13
0

13
11
17

<5
<5

<5
<5
Total
xylenes

<0.63
<0.63

11
11
0

14
"12
15

<5
<5

<5
<5
DQO

50

50

50

50

50
a  _
   = Not appropriate for calculation.
                                     81
-------
TABLE 56. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC TEST SAMPLE ANALYSIS HOLD TIMES
Sample
Sludge feed
Testl
Test 2
TestS
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
Duplicate analysis
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 2
Kiln ash
Testl
Test 2
TestS
Duplicate analysis
Test 4
TestS
Test 6
Scrubber liquor
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
TestS
Duplicate analysis
Test 6
Duplicate analysis
Afterburner exit Method
0010 Trains
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
TestS
Test 6
Method requirement
Aqueous liquids
All others
Collection
date

10/23/91
10/28/91
10/28/91
11/1/91
11/1/91
11/1/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
" 11/7/91
11/7/91


10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91



Extraction
Extraction hold time,
date days

10/29/91
10/30/91
10/30/91
11/4/91
11/5/91
11/4/91

10/29/91
10/30/91
11/4/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/13/91
11/13/91

10/30/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/11/91
11/11/91
11/13/91
11/11/91


10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91




6
2
2
3
4
3

5
1
4
5
1
7
6

6
8
6
1
5
5
6
4


0
0
0
0
0
0

7
14
Analysis
Analysis hold tune,
date days

11/13/91
11/13/91
11/14/91
11/15/91
11/15/91
11/15/91

11/25/91
11/25/91
11/26/91
11/26/91
11/27/91
12/4/91
12/5/91

11/25/91
11/27/91
11/26/91
11/29/91
11/29/91
12/2/91
12/5/91
12/5/91


11/18/91
11/18/91
11/26/91
11/27/91
11/27/91
12/2/91




15
14
15
11
10
11

27
26
22
21
21
21
22

26
21
20
23
18
21
22
24


25
20
26
22
21
25

40
A f\
40
                                                         (continued)
                               82
-------
TABLE 56.  (continued)
Sample
Scrubber exit Method 0010
trains
Test 1
% Test 2
Test3
Test 4
Test5
Test 6
Duplicate analysis
Method blank samples
Extraction solvent
Reagent water 1
Reagent water 2
Scrubber liquor 1
Scrubber liquor 2
Method 0010 train
sorbent resin
Method 0010 train filter
plus sorbent resin
Matrix spike samples
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
sludge feed
Spike duplicate
Test 5 kiln ash
Spike duplicate
Test 1 scrubber liquor
Spike duplicate
Method 0010 train
sorbent resin
Spike duplicate
Method requirement
Aqueous liquids
All others
Collection
date


10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91
11/7/91

10/24/91
11/11/91
11/13/91
11/6/91
11/7/91
10/24/91

10/29/91


11/1/91

11/1/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
10/24/91
10/24/91
10/31/91

10/31/91



Extraction
Extraction hold time, Analysis Analysis hold
date days date time, days


10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91


0
0
0
0
Sample lost
11/7/91
11/7/91

10/24/91
11/11/91
11/13/91
11/11/91
11/13/91
10/24/91

10/29/91


11/7/91

11/7/91
11/13/91
11/13/91
11/13/91
11/13/91 .
10/31/91

10/31/91



0
0

0
0
0
5
6
0

0

•
6

6
7
7
20
20
0

0

7
14


11/18/91
11/20/91
11/22/91
11/27/91
during extraction
12/2/91
12/2/91

11/18/91
12/9/91
12/9/91
12/5/91
12/5/91
11/18/91

12/2/91


11/15/91

11/15/91
12/6/91
12/6/91
12/5/91
12/5/91
11/26/91

11/22/91





25
22
22
22

25
25

25
28
26
24
22
25

34


8

8
23
23
22
22
26

22

40
40
         83
-------
exception of the scrubber liquor MS and MSD samples, were extracted within method hold time
requirements. The scrubber liquor MS and MSD samples were extracted 13 days after the 7-day
hold time had expired. However, no semivolatile organic constituent was found in the sample
used to prepare the MS and MSD samples, as discussed in Section 4.3. Furthermore, all of the
surrogate recoveries,  the spike compound  recoveries, and the RPD of the duplicate spike
compound recoveries were acceptable, as discussed below.  Thus, the failure to meet extraction
hold time limitations for these two samples did not affect test program conclusions.

        All samples were analyzed within method hold time requirements. One sample was lost
during extraction.  Thus, only 5  of the 6 planned scrubber exit flue gas semivolatile organic
constituent measurements, or 83 percent, were achieved. However, this exceeds the 70-percent
completeness objective for the measurement.

        No detectable semivolatile organic constituent was found in any method blank sample.

        Table 57 summarizes the semivolatile organic constituent measurement DQOs for
precision, accuracy, and completeness. The measurement PQL objectives and the PQLs achieved
are summarized in Table 58.  As in the volatile organic constituent analyses, instrument MDLs
were not used in this test program.  The PQLs used were the concentration of each constituent
in the lowest level calibration standard,  corrected for the test sludge feed extract dilutions
required for analysis.

        As shown in Table 58, all PQL objectives were met for the flue gas matrix; and all PQL
objectives, with the exception of those for 4-chloro-3-methyl phenol, were met for the kiln ash
and scrubber liquor matrices.  The 4-chloro-3-methyl phenol PQL achieved was only 25 percent
higher than the objective; the effect of this on test program conclusions is negligible. As was the
case for the volatile organic constituent analyses, the sludge feed extracts required substantial
dilution before analysis owing to their high organic  contamination levels.  Accordingly, the
matrix-corrected PQLs achieved were correspondingly higher than the PQL objectives, which are
appropriate  only for low-level materials.
     TABLE 57. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT MEASUREMENT DQOs
    Measurement
      parameter
 Measurement/
analytical method
           Precision,
            % RSD   Accuracy,  Completeness,
Reference    or RPD      %          %
 Semivolatile organics  Extraction,            SW-846:         50     D to 262*       70
 in sludge feed and    concentration, GC/MS  Methods
 kiln ash samples                           3540, 8080

 Semivolatile organics  Extraction,            SW-846:         50     D to 262*       70
 in scrubber liquor     concentration, GC/MS  Methods
 samples                                  3520,8270

 Semivolatile organics  Method 0010 sampling,  SW-846:         50     D to 262"       70
 in flue gas samples    extraction,             Methods
                    concentration, GC/MS  0010, 3540,
	8270	

 'D - Detected; compound-specific acceptance criteria taken from Table 6 of Method 8270.
                                          84
-------
TABLE 58. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT MEASUREMENT PQLs:
           OBJECTIVES AND ACHIEVED
Matrix
Lagoon 8 sludge, mg/kg
Target analytesa
4-Chloroaniline v^
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Group lb
All others0
Lagoon 3 sludge, mg/kg
Target analytesa
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Group lb
All others0
Kiln ash, mg/kg
Target analytesa
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Group lb
All others0
Scrubber liquor, /ig/L
Target analytesa
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Group lb
All others0
Flue gas, /tg/dscm
Target analytes3
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
Group lb
All others0

DQO

2.0
. 2.0
2.0
5.0
1.0

2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
1.0

2.0
2.0
2.0
5.0
1.0

20
20
20
50
10

10
10
10
30
5
PQL
Achieved

2,000
1,000
2,500
2,500
1,000

100 .
50
125
125
50

2.0
1.0
2.5
2.5
1.0

20
10
25
25
10

7
3
8
8
3
   aTarget analytes: aniline, azobenzene, benzidine, and 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine.
   bGroup 1: 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 2-nitroaniline,
   3-nitroaniline, 4-nitroaniline, 4-nitrophenol, and pentachlorophenol.
   °A11 other compounds in Table 13.
                                     85
-------
        Semivolatile organic constituent measurement accuracy was assessed by analyzing MS
and MSD samples of each matrix type. All samples were spiked with method surrogates prior
to extraction, and surrogate recovery was measured as an additional indicator of measurement
accuracy.

        The results of the MS/MSD sample analyses are summarized in Table 59.  Of the four
target analytes spiked into the MS/MSD samples, recovery acceptance limits are listed in Table 6
of Method  82705 for 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine only.  Thus, these limits were used for the other
three target analytes as well. The data in Table 59 show that all 32 of the MS recoveries were
within the recovery DCjO range.  Thus, the measurement accuracy objective, as measured by
spike recovery from MS/MSD samples, was met.

        All test program samples were spiked with the six surrogates recommended in Method
8270 prior to extraction. In addition, each Method 0010 sorbent resin cartridge was spiked with
octafluorobiphenyl and 9-phenylanthracene prior to sampling.   Table 60 summarizes  the
surrogate recoveries achieved, and compares them  to the recovery DQOs,  which are the
acceptance  limits for each compound documented in Table 8 of Method 8270.  No acceptance
limits have been defined in Method 8270 for octafluorobiphenyl and 9-phenyl-anthracene. Thus,
the acceptance limits of chemically similar compounds were used; the limits for 2-fluorobiphenyl
were used for octafluorobiphenyl, and the limits for 4-terphenyl-d14 used for 9-phenylanthracene.

        The data in Table 60 show that 258 of 266 recovery measurements, or 97 percent, were
within the compound-specific recovery DQO ranges. As this exceeds the completeness objective
of 70 percent for this measurement, the measurement accuracy DQO, as measured by surrogate
recovery, was met. No  surrogate recoveries for-sludge feed samples are shown in Table 60, as
surrogates  were added before extraction.  As noted  above,  sludge feed extracts required
substantial dilution before analysis. These dilutions caused final surrogate concentrations to fall
below PQL levels.

        Semivolatile organic constituent measurement precision was assessed by analyzing at
least one sample of each matrix type in duplicate and comparing duplicate sample analysis RPDs
to the precision DQO.  In addition, MS/MSD sample pairs of each matrix type were analyzed
and the duplicate spike recovery. RPDs compared  to the precision DQO.

        Table 61 summarizes the results of the duplicate sample analyses.' As shown, 6 of the
8 definitive RPD values, or 75 percent, were less than the DQO.  As this level exceeds the
70-percent completeness objective for the measurement, the precision objective as determined
by duplicate sample analysis, was met.

        Table 59 notes  the results of the MS/MSD sample analyses.  The data in the table show
that 14 of 16 RPDs,. or 88 percent, met the DQO. This exceeds the 70-percent completeness
objective, so the precision objective of the measurement, as determined by MS/MSD analyses,
was also met.

        As noted in the introduction of this section, the analytical records of the  analyses
performed in the onsite  laboratories were reviewed during a TSR of laboratory operations in late
January 1992. With respect to sample extractions, the TSR noted the following:

        •    With the exception of Method 0010 train samples, extractions .were performed
             according to the methods referenced in the QAPP

        •    Documentation was adequate and well organized


                                          86
-------
 TABLE 59. SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC CONSTITUENT RECOVERIES FROM MATRIX
          SPIKE SAMPLES
Spike recovery, %
Sample
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1 sludge
feed
MS
MSD
RPD, %
Test 5 kiln ash
MS
MSD
RPD, %
Test 1 scrubber liquor
MS
MSD
RPD, %
Method 0010 train sorbent resin
MS
MSD
RPD, %
DQO
Aniline


95
98
3

95
100
5

73
67
9

114
52
75
D to 262a»b
Azobenzene


116
111
4

76
75
1

61
58
5

101
68
39
D to 262a'b
Benzidine


112
121
8

71
79
11

31
31
0

139
53
90
D to 262a>b
3,3'-
Dichloro-
benzidine


191
161
17

110
118
7

68
58
16

103
98
5
D to 262a
DQO




50



50



50



50

aD = Detected.
b
 Recovery DQO same as for 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine.
                                   87
-------
CO
CO
H

S
Q



CO
O
U
O
Q
co
O
1

3
s
|

CO
€
I
      CO
         a. €

         *  §
         It
         «"  2
          E£ Eu

          S 2
          Z e
          It
             ei
             VJ
                     C/3  C/J C/3 C/5
                                                       C/5 C/3 C/3 CO C/3
                                                    C/3  C/3 C/3 CO C/3 C/3
                        Tt  tv) o n ON
                        oo  ^r o t— TI
                                                    00 »-H f- O O O
                                                    O\ *^ CO OO v\ wv
                                                            OO OO OO
                                              ss
                     oo vo co
                     GO r* o
                                                 ^H O\ t-<
                                                 r** oo oo
                                                    r**  ON f^ vo c^» m
                                                    00  VO r^ T ^ vo
                              1  •
a
e
a
u
                                                             C
                                         e
                                        1
                                        o
                                        S

                                        1
                                        I
         8  1
                  e   S
                 S  H
                                              -
                                                                                                   2
                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                ^ 5;
                                                                                                2 2
                                                                                                co oo
                                                                                                2 2
                                                                                                TO ^5

                                                                                                •* s

                                                                                                2 2
                                                                                                   3
                                                 «M
                                H E- H
                      u*
                      E- H H
« £ &  £   •£   tsatststsa  0  g. ^
S3 Q o  Q   S   uuuuuux,  5^==
H    H      «HE-'HHHHQ''<<
                                                                             S -a"

                                                                             f!
                                                                                                           O O
                                                                                                           OS c£
                                                                                                           V9 M
                                                                                                           A CO


                                                                                                           i i
                                                                                                           0 0
                                                           88
-------











TS"
1
.s
I
S
H
1-3
£



















*
«
i
§
%










tl
1 g
• i

,
E ^L
II
s .&
^
•=1
vo o*
TT. E
it
E S

|f
2 8
•^
f
"o
s
2
ft.
ii
S S
5*





1
1

o *-i vo w § rH c/3 so c« c/3 c/3 ,-H c« CD en c/j c/3 CD c/3
'



vo o vo TT T evi c/3 to vj c/5 co oo s" v) tn  vo v5 m r~ oo ZZZZZ«Z 22Z25ZZ
vo ro ^j* ?o co t^* JQ *o vj ro *3! US "^ ®^ ^3! ^^ ®2 2l ^5

otio^voooS Sox3ooS\o?v§ ?5®2§vSSoo

gsggsgs SS^S^RS g;Sv§^$g


WOOTfvOOOtS OOOOlrtvOvOfvl^H --H"»OOOVor-
ON ON OO OO ON O OO OO 00 OO r** OO OO OH ON VO VO ON VO



^rovooofip- OMuififSOfi eooc^votsox
r** t*- v} ^ vo vo o oo oo oo r** ON r^ oo ON *o fi ON vo
i-H

^0^30,^ ^gfs^sp- SS33SS


e .5 ' .S
«: , *• a *"
s !£• §
0 JD o . J3
O *• iS W **
1 «^ *^g 3*
•= '^ S* « „, P4 -S .S -S, -2* .S
« -I" 1 |-« t tJ 8 8 S S" | 8 S
»• .a3-2g«55»3T3-ag S'-^u"^'0^
^^rJcoTTvol.^ Sa&jiJi55iS **"&*&£&
•§ BSSSSQ 5 iSSggSJg 5 St&S 5*5 ^
SHHHHH ,2W«;«;s/jc/j2S<0,2H H 2
en <5 2
fe
• C/5 *^
•M
S
J=
TO
§ 2
22
99
0 O
O ON
i— I i— I
2 2


2 2
v-, rr>
W
3C«
S'o
+•*
"*

2 2
55





(A
•a
f
0 J
« s °
8-«





















ii
11
If
^i
M tA
C3 cQ *
i I
S S
loo
f.00
Q Q
C/3 Q) O
89
-------
   TABLE 61.  SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS PRECISION FROM DUPLICATE
               SAMPLE ANALYSIS
                                                Concentration
          Sample
Azobenzene Benzidine
3,3'-Dichloro-  Butyl benzyl  Bis(2-etuyl-hexyl)
 benzidine     phtbalate     phthalate     DQO
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
sludge feed
Analysis, nig/kg
Duplicate analysis, mg/kg
RPD, %
Test 3 kiln ash
Analysis, mg/kg
Duplicate analysis, mg/kg
KPD, %
Test 5 scrubber liquor
Analysis, fig/L
Duplicate analysis, /ig/L
RPD, %
Test 6 scrubber liquor
Analysis, /tg/L
Duplicate analysis, pg/L
RPD, %
Test 6 scrubber exit flue gas
Method 0010 train
Analysis, /zg/train
Duplicate analysis, /zg/train
RPD, %

190

-------
        •    The extraction procedure used for Method 0010 samples did not include separate
             extractions  of various train  components, but,  rather,  combined  fractions for
             extraction

        •    Solvent blank preparations were not recorded for the continuous extractors used
 i            for aqueous liquid samples

        •    Surrogates for the Method 0010 samples were spiked onto the glass wool covering
             the sorbent resin in the extraction thimble rather than onto the XAD directly

 In its response to these concerns, the IRF noted that:

        •    Balance calibration was, indeed, not checked. However, the one balance out of
             calibration was so by only about 0.1 percent

        •    The extraction procedure used for Method 0010 samples was as specified in the
             QAPP  and  did,  indeed, deviate  slightly from  the procedure  documented in
             Method 0010

        •    Solvent blanks were prepared  at the correct frequency, but were inadvertently not
             recorded in the logbook.  However, they were recorded in the analyst's journal.

        •    Correct spiking of sorbent resin was initiated immediately

 These concerns are not believed to have affected the test program conclusions. Nevertheless,
 corrective actions were taken including:

        •    Arranging for a service and maintenance contract for all laboratory balances

        •    Adjusting extraction procedures in the extraction standard operating procedure
             (SOP) to strictly follow Method 0010 for the Method 0010 samples

        «    Transcribing solvent blank preparation records from the analysts journal into the
             extraction logbook

        «    Adjusting the surrogate spiking procedure in the extraction SOP to clearly specify
             surrogate injection into the sorbent resin     -    •

 63      TRACE METAL ANALYSES

        Fifty-nine test program samples were analyzed for trace metals.  Included in this total
were five method blank samples and seven pairs of MS/MSD samples. All trace metal analyses
were performed by the American Interplex Laboratories in Little Rock, Arkansas.

        Table 62 summarizes the sample collection and trace metal analysis dates for the test
program samples.  As shown in the table, all samples were analyzed well within method hold
time limits.

        Table 63 summarizes the method blank sample trace metal analysis results. As shown,
five method blank samples were analyzed. The TCLP extraction blank was free of trace metal
content  to the MDLs noted in  the table.  Both scrubber liquor blank samples, taken from the
scrubber system recirculation loop just prior to Tests 5 and 6, contained measurable quantities


                                          91
-------
TABLE 62. TRACE METAL TEST SAMPLE ANALYSIS HOLD TIMES
Sample
Sludge feed
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
Duplicate analysis
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 2
SoU feed TCLP leachate
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
Duplicate analysis
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 2
Kiln ash
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
Duplicate analysis
Test 5
Test 6
Kiln ash TCLP leachate
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 4
Duplicate analysis
TestS
Test 6
Method requirement
Hg
All others
Collection
date

10/23/91
10/28/91
10/28/91
11/1/91
11/1/91
11/1/91

10/23/91
10/28/91
10/28/91
11/1/91
11/1/91
11/1/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91



Analysis Analysis hold
date time, days

10/31/91
11/8/91
11/8/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91

11/8/91
11/21/91.
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91

10/31/91
11/8/91
11/8/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91

11/8/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91




8
11
11
20
20
20

16
24
24
20
20
20

7
10
8
16
16
15
14

15
23
24
16
16
15
14

28
180
                                               (continued)
                          92
-------
TABLE 62. (continued)
Sample
Scrubber liquor ;
Test 1
Test 2
Tests
Test 4
Duplicate analysis
TestS
Test 6
Scrubber exit flue gas metals
train
Probe wash and filter
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
Duplicate analysis
TestS
Test 6
Combined impinger solution
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 4
Duplicate analysis
Test 5
Test 6
Method blanks
TCLP extraction fluid
Scrubber liquor 1
Scrubber liquor 2
Multiple metals train:
Filter
Impinger charging solution
Method requirement
Hg
All others
Collection
date

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/7/91



10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

10/29/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

11/7/91
11/7/91



Analysis Analysis hold
date time, days

10/31/91
11/8/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91



10/31/91
11/8/91
11/8/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91

10/31/91
11/8/91
11/8/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91

11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91

11/21/91
11/21/91




7
10
24
16
16
15
14



7
10
8
16
16
15
14

7
10
8
16
16
15
14

23 .
15
14

14
14

28
180
                                   (continued)
         93
-------
                               TABLE 62.  (continued)
Sample
Matrix spike samples
Sludge feed
Spike duplicate
Sludge feed TCLP leachate
Spike duplicate
Kiln ash
Spike duplicate
Kiln ash TCLP leachate
Spike duplicate
Scrubber liquor
Spike duplicate
Multiple metals train
Filter
Spike duplicate
Combined impinger solution
Spike duplicate
Method requirement
Hg
All others
Collection
date

11/1/91
11/1/91
11/1/91
11/1/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/5/91
11/5/91

11/11/91
11/11/91
11/5/91
11/5/91



Analysis Analysis hold
date time, days

11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91

11/21/91
11/21/91
11/21/91.
11/21/91




20
20
20
20
16
16
16
16
16
16

10
10
16
16

28
180
       TABLE 63. TRACE METAL ANALYSES OF METHOD BLANK SAMPLES
Concentration
Method blank sample
TCLP extraction blank, pg/L
Scrubber
Scrubber
liquor blank 1, jtg/L
liquor blank 2, /tg/L
Sb
<100
<100
<100
As
1
42
110
Ba
<10
110
150
Be
<2
<2
<2
Cd
<5
<5
27
Cr
<10
26
43
Pb
<100
380
790
Hg
<50
<50
<50
Se
<200
<200
<200
Ag
<10
<10
<10
Multiple metals train

 Filter blank, jig/filter          <10   034  17   <0.2  <0.5  4.1    <10   NA.a   <20  <1

 Impinger solution blank,/tg/Lb  <100  <1   56   <2    <5   <10   <100  NA.   <200 <10

*N.A. = Not analyzed.
"Average of duplicate analyses.
                                        94
-------
of arsenic, barium, cKromium, and lead; and one blank also contained cadmium. The multiple
metals train filter blank also contained arsenic, barium, and chromium. The impinger charging.
solution blank contained barium.

        The source of the arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, and lead in the scrubber liquor
blanks may have been from some small amount of residue from previous tests remaining in the
scrubber liquor recirculation loop.  However, scrubber liquor makeup is host site plant water
obtained from local walls, which undoubtedly contain some trace metal content. Current practice
adopted after these tests is to take a scrubber liquor blank from the recirculating scrubber liquor
just before the start of waste feed for all tests.

        The origin of the barium in the multiple metals train impinger solution blank has no
readily apparent explanation.

        The scrubber liquor test sample trace metal concentrations noted in Tables 27 and 28
were not blank-corrected for the blank concentrations measured. However, the scrubber liquor
metal concentrations used to calculate the trace metal distributions tabulated in Tables 30 and 31
were corrected using the mean of the metal concentrations measured as noted in Table 63.  The
flue gas concentrations noted in Tables 27 and 28 were based on blank-corrected multiple metals
train filter and impinger solution catches using the blank levels noted in Table 63. These blank-
corrected concentrations were, in turn, used in the metal distribution calculations for Tables 30
and 31.

        Table  64  summarizes  the   trace  metal  measurement  precision,   accuracy,  and
completeness data quality objectives (DQOs).  Table 65 lists the MDLs achieved for each sample
matrix, and compares them to the respective  MDL DQOs. All MDL DQOs were met for the
sludge feed and solid residue, and aqueous liquid sample matrices.  The flue gas MDL DQOs
were  also met  for beryllium, cadmium, and silver.  However,  the flue gas MDLs achieved
exceeded respective DQOs for antimony, arsenic,- barium, chromium, lead, and selenium.

        Chromium and lead were quantitated in the flue gas for  all tests, so failing the flue gas
MDL DQOs for these two metals had no effect on test conclusions.  Antimony and selenium
                   TABLE 64. TRACE METAL MEASUREMENT DQOs
                      Measurement/                          Precision,
                        analytical                             % RSD   Accuracy,  Completeness,
                         method       Reference    Conditions    or RPD      %         %
Measurement parameter
 Trace metals in sludge
 feed, kiln ash, and flue
 gas paniculate samples

 Trace metals in scrubber
 liquor, TCLP leachate,
 and flue gas sampling
 train impinger solutions

 Mercury in sludge feed
 and kiln ash samples

 Mercury in scrubber
 liquor and TCLP leachate
 samples
                     ICAPorAA    SW-846:      Digestion by     25     70 to 130      70
                                  Method 6010,  Method 3050
                                  7060

                     ICAPorAA    SW-846:      Digestion by     25     70 to 130      70
                                  Method 6010,  Method 3010
                                  7060
                     AA           SW-846:      Digestion by     25     70 to 130      70
                                  Method 7471   Method 7471

                     AA           SW-846:      Digestion by     25     70 to 130      70
                                  Method 7470   Method 7470
                                           95
-------
TABLE 65. TRACE METAL MEASUREMENT MDLs: OBJECTIVES AND ACHIEVED
Matrix
Sludge feed and solid residues, mg/kg
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Hg
Se
Ag
Aqueous liquids, including TCLP leachates, pg/L
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Hg
Se
Ag
Flue gas, /ig/dscm
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
Pb
Se
Ag

DQO

20
1
1
1
2
2
10
1
20
2

500
50
50
50
100
100
200
50
500
100

20
1
1
1
2
2
10
2
20
MDL
Achieved

10
1
1
0.2
0.5
1
10
1
20
1

100
50
10
2
5 '
10
100
50
200
10

26 to 83
3 to 74
19
0.6
1.1
3.1
22
53 to 170
8.3
                              96
-------
•were not found in either test sludge feed, so no conclusions regarding the distributions of these
metals were reached. In addition, antimony and selenium were not detected in any test program
sample.  Thus, failing the flue gas MDL DQO for these two metals had no effect on test
conclusions. Similarly, arsenic was found in test sludge feed samples just at the MDL for this
matrix.  Because of this, no conclusions regarding arsenic distributions are discussed. Arsenic
was quantitated in the flue gas for four of the six tests. However, for two of the tests, the flue
gas was reported to contain no arsenic at a MDL substantially above the DQO level. A stronger
statement would have been possible had the DQO been achieved. The high barium DQO was
due to barium's presence in both the filter blank and the impinger solution blank of the multiple
metals train. Test sample values were near blank levels for all tests. Thus, the MDL for barium
was based on the blank levels measured and not the method capabilities.  This prevented the
ability to be more precise in discussing barium distributions for the five tests in which barium
was reported as not detected in the flue gas. However, this outcome was unavoidable.

        Trace metal analysis precision was assessed by analyzing one sample of each sample
matrix collected or prepared in duplicate, and by analyzing one pair of MS/MSD samples for
each sample matrix collected or prepared.  Table 66 summarizes the results of the duplicate
sample analyses, noting the RPD attained for the measurements.  Of the 20 definitive  RPDs
achieved,  17,  or 85 percent, met the DQO  of  25 percent for this measurement.   The
completeness objective for the measurements was 70 percent. Thus, the precision DQO was met,
as assessed by duplicate sample analyses.

        Table 67 summarizes the results of the MS/MSD sample analyses.  As shown  in the
table, all 68 duplicate analyses,  or 100 percent, met the precision DQO of 25 percent RPD.
Thus, the precision DQO, as assessed by MS/MSD analyses, was met.

        Trace metal measurement accuracy was also assessed via the MS/MSD analyses. The
data in Table 67 show that 130 of 136 metal spike recovery measurements, or 96 percent, met
the recovery objective of 70 to 130 percent. As the completeness objective for this measurement
was 70 percent, the trace metal measurement accuracy DQO was met.

6.4     FLUE GAS HC1 ANALYSES

        Twenty-three test program samples were analyzed for chloride  ion to support the flue
gas HC1 concentration measurements. Included in this number were one method blank sample
and two pairs  of MS/MSD samples. All chloride measurements were performed in the IRF
onsite laboratories by Method 300.08.

        Table 68 summarizes  the sample  collection and  analysis dates for the chloride
measurements.  As shown, all samples were analyzed within the 28-day method hold time
requirement.

        Table 69 lists the chloride measurement precision, accuracy, and completeness DQOs.
The PQL DQO for the  measurement is 100 |Kg/dscm. As the PQLs achieved were 40 /ig/dscm
or less, this objective was met.  Chloride was not detected in the impinger charging solution
method blank sample at a PQL of 0.1 mg/L.

        Chloride measurement precision was assessed by analyzing two samples in duplicate, and
by preparing and analyzing two pairs of MS/MSD samples.  One of the samples analyzed in
duplicate contained no  detectable chloride in either duplicate analysis.  The other sample was
analyzed at 5.26 and 5.27 mg/L chloride in the two analyses.  The RPD of these results is
0.2 percent, well within the precision DQO of 30 percent.


                                          97
-------
   TABLE 66. TRACE METAL ANALYSIS PRECISION FROM DUPLICATE SAMPLE
             ANALYSES
Concentration
Sample
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
sludge feed
Analysis, mg/kg
Duplicate analysis, mg/kg
RPD, '^
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
sludge feed TCLP leachate
Analysis, pg/L
Duplicate analysis, ptg/L
RPD, %
Test 4 kiln ash
Analysis, mg/kg
Duplicate analysis, mg/kg
RPD, %
Test 4 kiln ash TCLP
leachate
Analysis, /zg/L
Duplicate analysis, /tg/L
RPD, %
Test 4 scrubber liquor
Analysis, ngfL
Duplicate analysis, jig/L
RPD,%
Test 4 flue gas metals train
filter
Analysis, /tg/filter
Duplicate analysis, fig/filter
RPD, %
Test 4 flue gas metals train
impinger solution
Analysis, jtg/L
Duplicate analysis, pg/L
RPD, %
Sb


<0.2
<0.2
a


<50
<50
—

<10
<10
—


<100
<100
—

<100
<100
—


10
<10
—


<100
<100
—
As


1.1
0.83
28


<1
<1
—

9.4
8.7
8


<1
<1
—

190
140
30


24
29
19


<1
<1
—
Ba


37
41
10


85
82.
4

64
66
3


380
370
3

180
180
0


19
18
5


28
28
0
Be


<0.2
<0.2
—


<2
<2
—

<0.2
<0.2
—


<2
<2
—

<2
<2
—


<2
<2
—


<2
<2
—
Cd


<0.5
<0.5
—


<5
<5
—

<0.5
<0.5
—


<5
<5
—

52
52
0


17
17
0


<5
<5
—
Cr


26
37
35


<10
<10
—

59
58
2


72
72
0

220
220
0


76
76
0
•

<10
<10
—
Pb


<10
<10
—


<100
<100
— .

<10
<10
—


<100
<100
—

10,000
10,000
0


850
860
1


<100
<100
—
Hg


<0.2
-------
TABLE 67. TRACE METAL ANALYSIS ACCURACY AND PRECISION FROM MS/MSD
         SAMPLE ANALYSES
Matrix spike sample
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
sludge feed
Spike level, mg/kg
Recovery, %, MS
Recovery, %, MSD
RPD, %
Tests 4, 5, 6 Composite 1
sludge feed TCLP leachate
. Spike level, pg/L
Recovery, %, MS
Recovery, %, MSD
RPD, %
Test 4 kiln ash
Spike level, mg/kg
Recovery, %, MS
Recovery, %, MSD
RPD,%
Test 4 kiln ash TCLP leachate
Spike level, /tg/L
Recovery, %, MS
Recovery, %, MSD
RPD, %
Test 4 scrubber liquor
Spike level, /tg/L
Recovery, %, MS
Recovery, %, MSD
RPD, %
Metals train blank filters
Spike level, mg/kg
Recovery, %, MS
Recovery, %, MSD
RPD, %
Test 4 metals train impinger
solution
Spike level, /tg/L
Recovery, %, MS
Recovery, %, MSD
RPD, %
aNA. = Not analyzed.
Sb


100
823
93.0
12


2,500
84.0
86.4
3

100
953
85.8
10

2,500
86.0
89.2
4

2,500
68.0
64.8
5

100
83.8
72.8
14


2,500
92.0
93.2
1

As


5
98.4
192.
22


250
110
109
1

5
120
113
6

250
75.2
87.2
15

250
108
92.4
16

5
90.8
74.8
19


250
120
108
11

Ba


80
86.8
86.8
0


250
87.5
83.9
4

160
74.2
76.8
3

250
78.4
79.6
2

2,000
82.2
78.2
5

5
98.0
95.6
2


250
93.9
963
3

Be


5
93.6
94.8
1


250
82.8
78.8
5

5 •
92.4
86.8
6

250
78.8
78.4
1

250
80.8
77.6
4,

5
86.6
74.8
15


250
90.4
. 92.8
3

Cd


10
84.9
843
1


500
82.0
78.6
4

10
84.1
76.9
9

500
79.2
78.4
1

500
78.4
74.2
6

10
91.6
80.6
13


500
92.4
92.8
0.4

Cr


50
90.4
85.6
5


500
87.4
81.6
7

100
88.9
76.9
14

500
87.2
81.2
7

500
79.6
75.8
5

10
96.9
90.1
7


500
89.6
91.0
2 •

Pb


50
98.2
99.6
1


1,000
82.1
83.9
2

50
107
93
14

1,000
85.1
83.6
2

1,000
120
120
0

50
89.0
86.8
3 ,


1,000
91.4
90.8
1

Hg


5
113
106
6


250
99.6
105
5

5
92.0
99.1
7

250
102
107
5

250
103
95.6
7


NA.«
NA.
b



NA.
NA.
—

Se


100
90.6
90.6
0


500
95.2
92.0
3

100
71.5
71.9
r

2,500
93.6
91.6
2

2,500
87.6
83.2
5

100
89.2
72.0
21


2,500
94.4
96.4
2

Ag


10
66.4
84.5
24


500
82.4
89.2
8

10
62.7
65.4
4

500
90.0
83.2
8

500
75.4
63.6
17

10
79.5
80.4
1


500
97.4
97.6
02

DQO



70-130
70-130
25



70-130
70-130
25

-
70-130
70-130
25


70-130
70-130
25


70-130
70-130
25


70-130
70-130
25



70-130
70-130
25

b— • = Not appropriate for calculation.
                               99
-------
TABLE 68.  FLUE GAS HC1 TRAIN SAMPLE ANALYSIS HOLD TIMES
Sample
Afterburner exit
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 4
TestS
Test 6
Scrubber exit
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
Test 5
Duplicate analysis
Test 6
Stack
Test 1
Test 2
TestS
Test 4
TestS
Test 6
Duplicate analysis
Collection
date

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/7/91

10/24/91
10/29/91
10/31/91
11/5/91
11/6/91
11/7/91
11/7/91
Analysis Analysis hold
date time, days

11/11/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/13/91
11/13/91
11/13/91

11/11/91
11/13/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/13/91

11/11/91
11/11/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/13/91
11/13/91

18
14
12
8
7
6

18
15
12
7
6
6
6

18
13
12
7
6
6
6
 Method blank sample

  Impinger charging solution

 Matrix spike samples

  Test 5 scrubber exit
   Spike duplicate
  Test 5 afterburner exit
   Spike duplicate

 Method requirement
11/7/91    11/13/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/6/91
11/12/91
11/12/91
11/13/91
11/13/91
 6
 6
 7
 7

28
                              100
-------
                       TABLE 69. HC1 MEASUREMENT DQOs
                                                    Precision,
   Measurement    Measurement/                        % RSD or   Accuracy,  Completeness,
    parameter    analytical method	Reference	RPD	%	%	

  HC1 in flue gas  Method 5 sampling,   40 CFR 60, Appendix A,     30     75 to 125      70
               ion chromatographic  Method 5; Water and
               analysis  ,         Wastes, Method 300.0           	___^__
       TABLE 70.  CHLORIDE RECOVERIES FROM MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLES
Chloride recovery, %
Sample
Test 5 scrubber exit
Test 5 afterburner exit
DQO
MS
94
100
75 to
MSD
96
113
125
RPD,%
2
12
30
       The results of the MS/MSD sample analyses are summarized in Table 70. As shown,
the RPDs of both MS/MSD analysis pairs met the precision DQO of 30 percent. In addition,
all four spike recoveries from MS/MSD samples met the accuracy objective of 75- to 125-percent
recovery.

       The precision and accuracy DQOs for the  chloride measurements were met, as
determined by all of the assessment procedures performed.
                                         101
-------
                                   REFERENCES
 1.   "Remedial Investigation Report for the Bofors Site, Muskegon, Michigan," prepared by
     GZA-Donahue, Livonia, Michigan, February 1990.

 2.   Phase  n Remedial- Investigation  Report for  the  Bofors  Site,  Muskegon,  Michigan,"
     prepared by GZA-Donahue, Livonia, Michigan, March 1990.

 3.   "Draft  Public Comment Feasibility Study Report for the Lagoon Operable Unit, Bofors
     Site, Muskegon, Michigan," prepared by GZA-Donahue, Livonia,  Michigan, May 1990.

 4.   "Declaration for the Record of Decision for the Bofors-Nobel Site, Muskegon, Michigan,"
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V, September 1990.

 5.   "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods," EPA SW-846,3rd
     edition, November  1986.

 6.   40 CFR, Part 261, Appendix II.

7.   40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix A.

8.   "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes," EPA-600/4-84-017, March 1984.

9.   "Stationary Source Test Methods, Volume 1, Methods for Determining Compliance with
     District Nonvehicular (Stationary  Source) Emission Standards," State of California Air
     Resources Board, Sacramento, California, March 1988.

10.   "Proposed Methods for Stack Emissions Measurements for CO, O2, THC, HC1, and Metals
     at Hazardous Waste Incinerators," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid
     Waste,  November 1989.

11.   "Guidance on Setting Permit Conditions and Reporting Trial Burn Results, Volume II of
     the Hazardous Waste Incineration Guidance Series," EPA/625/6-89/019, January 1989.

12.   Edwards, L. O., et al.,  "Trace Metals and Stationary Conventional Combustion Sources,
     Volume 1, Technical Report," EPA-600/7-80-155a, August 1980.

13.   Fourriier, D. J., Jr., and L. R. Waterland, "The Fate of Trace Metals in a Rotary Kiln
     Incinerator   with  a   Single-Stage  Ionizing   Wet  Scrubber,"  EPA/600/2-91/032,
     September 1991.
                                        102
-------
14.   Fournier, D. J., Jr., W. E. Whitworth, Jr., J. W. Lee, and L. R. Waterland, "The Fate of
     Trace Metals in  a Rotary Kiln Incinerator with a Venturi/Packed-Column Scrubber,"
     EPA/600/2-90/043, February 1991.

15.   "Test Plan for Evaluating the Incinerability of Contaminated Sludges from the Bofors-Nobel
     Superfund Site, Revision  1," prepared by Acurex Environmental Corporation under EPA
     Contract 68-C9-0038, September 1991.

16.   "Quality Assurance Project Plan for Evaluating the Incinerability of Contaminated Sludges
     from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site," prepared by Acurex Environmental Corporation
     under EPA Contract 68-C9-0038, September 1991.
                                        103
-------
        APPENDIX A




INCINERATOR OPERATING DATA
            104
-------
    APPENDIX A-l




CONTROL ROOM DATA
       105
-------
          CO Si
       •a e a. o >n q >«  q q q  q q q q q q q q q   q q oa-

                st

                «•


          •C °- T
          2 •"  S
          S




                     omqqqqqqqqqqqqqq   qqo\
                     ooooModoocotnelooodoeeeeo   coma

          CU S  _
             £ :"



          < 3  H    o' o" d 6  o o d  o o o' o' d o o' o' o"   ode'
             ~  "    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA    AAA





          ._ =  o    oooooooooooooo_o_o   qq
          ^ 2  S    do'dddddddo'dddddd   d d o

             S.S
             eu,  -
 \


  i
   •a

at
o  1
K  *
•—•  *>
8  a
e  "
51

   C tt«  6




T3  C  5


«lfiH
           | I I

           O

        js  « n.
        laS
        3  Q^
        O
JS 80 O 
                                                                                                                 c
                                                                                                                 a

                                                                                                                 a
                                                                                                                 a
                                                                                                                 oo
                                                                                                                 •o
o
•
                                                                                                                        a
-------
8 a  a t.
t2^E
                         m  .-  a, i
                         «  .b
                            s
                              ;o

                              's
                            s


                         lilt
                  8 "E,


                  § i
                  05 «

                  ^ «
                  2 M

                  e 2
                  o 2
                  O E
 «I •= ?•
 •g I W 5.
   3

   o
                                                   O v* (*4 O\
                                                                   o  oo tn « oo
                                                                   m  oo 1-1 o\ •»
                                                                   t»  r- oo r» p-
                                         Os ^ V
                                         too
                                                                         oo OB »H
                                                                     er>3>4    rtooe
                                                                     ec4
                                                                                   vo  m oo
S
              <-
                8-i»O"(O^o»<
                Ot-ii-ii-irtNN
                                                                                                                                        a


                                                                                                                                        eg
                                                                                                                                        a

                                                                                                                                        CD
                                                                                                                                        01

                                                                                                                                        a
                                                                                                               o

                                                                                                              •o
                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                                                       a
                                                                        107
-------
       v  e a. <•?



       2j   Sj


         •C O" *?
          §•00

          w   e
         >   c


          Sfil

         2!I
          B '« <•?
         5 S §
         HM v) a

         1  S.s
           &• ^-1
       &• i! « Ct
       32 S a
       c  ra •-' <"
       J^-
       •* ^ M

       pl^
       1    5
       m


         III
         C* tit

         >


       I Hi
       •s a
o
       •e  t> M c
       «  0 -.f •>
       e  2 « °


s §   ^

?'   ».s|I
rt ^   fc^_ ^   ^"
Bo.   ^; ^ i
g  8   >  S »'

«  S     ^
"g  g,


II"       I
            NNMNO4PJWONNNNO4NNW
              00 00 00 GV
                                                     Wl m   g
                                                   »-i\ooo   MM
                                                   »-'w**   oo v>
                                                   9> 00 00   P*1 9*
         oov>v>oow^o<->
                                            888888    §88
            OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO    © O
            t*jcntocotor*itoc*ififncici<*if*^fnfiwp'i<'ic'i    ci.fj
                                                            ' e 
                                         108
                                                                                               o


                                                                                               1.


                                                                                               a
                                                                                               «
                                                                                               03
                                                                                               09
                                                                                               OS
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         TJ
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                         •c
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                         a

                                                                                                         C3>



                                                                                                         a
-------
O  bfi

O  c
a
   a

   E
        -
        afl  a

           O  £
           o
           3
           CP
           3  D.
              ;O

              2
        - "«  -g
        ST'S  a ?_
              us:
              2  «-
           O '5  tt.
 o a       g «-

£i       5

1^
 e

                                                                                   o\  m v
                                                                                   to  *r to
                      gj
                      >ntotoc>i-ieoror-r»
                      ^•^•^"(O'CcJtO'^cJ**
                      t-t-r-t^p-t-e^r-oooo
                      CO  CO tO CO CO CO  (O CO CO CO
                                                       i
                                                       m
                                                                        O  Ov
   atM *«4 r-fc ** ?H    ** *•*
   to W O «•« to    N (O
o  o o o o >-i    r- o
                         i-i  o Gi-ii-ir*
                         §>n<<)
                         oo
                                                                                   S ££
                                                                                   SS8
                                                            109
                                                                                                                             a

                                                                                                                             ID
                                                                                                                             eg
                                                                                                                             a
                                                                                                                            •D
                                                                                                                             O



                                                                                                                             I

                                                                                                                             OB
                                                                                                                             C
                                                                                                                            —


                                                                                                                            a
-------
               a  t.

            o  JJ
            3s
            «
      21 u S — I
      s^JSira
      o  a •-!  01
      •«  > -j;
         i    s
         S    H
                   .,

            l!
M    .e  M j: -r
       M  a  n  *
   a
B 1.

i!
                S

               P
                        «n«nooooooeeoooee<»ooqe«>e>
                        oeeoooe
                                                                      oeoe  o  o  o    s o
                        oooooo
                                                          oodoooo»doc>    odd
                     NNt->N-'NM'-''-'P.r« — ^-»iP4P»'-"'-'
                     ooooooooooooooqooo

                     d d  d  d  o"  d  d d d o o" d d dd««n«nm«n«    ci o  <«>
                                                                  110
                                                                                                                                          Q.


                                                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                                                          a

                                                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                                                          a>
                                                                                                                                        O

                                                                                                                                       •o
                                                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                                                       •
                                                                                                                                          a
-------
            a C
           3
       03 .fe  3

       « 5
           K. a
       03 "  * JS
       < o  o 5
         hi tr1
         O ffi

         3  O-

         If
       8 =
       CO
         a I1
       I .2 "S ft.
       £ 8 a
         IS
       •S

       I
       o
a  o.

§  i
OS  5
   A
O  «
2  BO
C  »
5*  a
   z
            2 ?-
            09
       «  | -a £
       •g  I « «-
a

O
                          >
                       ?Smeiio«i

                                                                          oo a

                                                                          c*OTroo
                                                                 T'
-------
   e *«•
  1 a t
•a a  a.
8 S "°  -.
•8 .3    *

•S3   C
  *!"•  CL ^*
  1 4? o
  |S'S
  ?  a*
  tti  **  n

  J2  8
  G  a
    0.
o* i-  i« *•*
3  **  *» "3
4*  "s .E! U
LJ  ^"* _. VT_
   Lt  U j-J
o
5
  *r*  a*
  log
      73 8
       «{ S
      "S 2
     111
    E
0\ rt

S  •
  S
B "5.
8 a

11
U
  111
  u B. u
  O

m
6) U 1M
3 CU
a

j= M j:
60 B IJ
75 ^ <.
^ S
  OS

IksS
u -a «
^ S 5=
     u
     g
     H
                        eocoo5oooocor-ooooa>cor-oo'nr»t~«   r- oo
                                                              o o
                 dr4^v>viinv>«^r->e
-------
         £ ~
                g
         £  *
             s
            I
I  I  a

1 2
               'O s-
                Qu
               ^
               2

 B  a.

if
"3  ™
 S  M
 c  «
 o 2
o E
   g «  5.
      v
      B
               oo oo w
                        to t m in o «
                                          vot^vpoot-r»ooopt~oogjg«o«o    in oo f»
                                    O O T-<
                                    M W rt
                                                                        oo  rx
                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                       a
                                                                                                                                       a
                                                                                                                                       a
                                                                                                                                       a
o
•o
                                                                                                                             0)
                                                                                                                             a.
-------
      sae
      *i*
      W » e
      « H "
       13 B
      h ki /*>

      Us
      11
CN
v>
    lill
      IIs
      o

    J3 • w. S?
S  ^ M^ -j
- o
      ti
      A
  .5  .5? .5

ft. n
a. S    «
             o'ddo'dddddddo'o'ddo'ddddd  d
            do'dddddddddddddoooooo
                                              <* o m
                                              e N e
                                              odd

                oooooooo
                                           8
            >nov>qqoqqv>q
-------
            •s  £•&«
            «  a  ?_
                o  s
                rJ  <3
                E  3
             gffi
             3  O-
             o-
          3  ••*


         |J
                a «-
             ra
O>
V>

ri r  co od 06  od  oo 06 oo oo  od  od oo 06  oo  od oo eo  06     eeoood
                             fS
          f»G
-------
         BO •**•
         Sat
         r* *• ^

         aat
       •o e  n. <~
         *I"  CU ^*
         I -a  «

         3    »
           £  5
           a,

           1^ ^-«

             "«

         II  B
•°  e

ll
ft.  O
           s c

           '
         111
       O


       Ji
           J3 CJ


             I
a 1.

§ I
o: 2
6 E
J3  U U

.S? .S «
v -a « c

       ^
     8

     H
                  V)

                  I
g s
                  <-f->

                                                   2 8 « 3! S   !nwS!
                                                   00 ^ ^ ^ 00   ^* 00 ^
                  ooeeooeooaeoeoooeoeoaoi o.o o o N o r) o o
                  «rc>'Hqooc9O-<»«'-'-«'"oomou)e«neine«n

                                               116
                                                                                            a
                                                                                            a
                                                      c
                                                      w


                                                      Q
-------
       2 tS § £


        ^   H


       •S •* I
                           E




                      « S £
                         85
                         3 °-


                           •g
                           (0

                           W5
                          .
5»-
s 'i.
g  a
                o 2
               U E
o x **•
gut
            a

            H
                                                                                           ooo
                                                                                           i> fin

                                    NOOO*nvCOOC4O


                                    ^ O O  O O 9 9 O
R
                                       Sm
                                       O
3
                                                                                           o\ r»
                                                                                           m oo
                                                                                           viin

                                                                   117
                                                                                                                         i
                                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                                         •o
                                                                                                                         _o


                                                                                                                         i

                                                                                                                         a
-------
•o  a o. /•;
is*?
  •C  Cu
   3-00
   .»    c
   5*    C
   •o  « 3
   w  S -
   38
   <  3
      a
   e  f>
   S3  tj
 •S  «^
£ Si 2

«s
o\  m
   ff
i H.

jl
Cont

Flue
   11
73 e  a


   11
   1  o
JB n «*> C
 g 8 n s
 S &"
o

J= M JS
 DO c  <» ;
   OS

JS M O <-
.5? .5  « £
      u
      S

      H
                    or-

                                                                         C**    *f ^
                                                                         >o    NO m
                                                                         i-    r- oo
                    t»ciooleio6ooodooolo6o6o6r«t»r»t»    t» c! 09
                                                                       o o vi
                                                                       
                    3  § §  § g § §
                    6ddoo«ooooooooooc>ooooo    o  o o
                                 8fimmr*ci?tf*r*r*r*me*nnifm^    ^Q£!
                                 oooooeoo'ooooooooo    ooo
             i?Tr^f'»'r'f'r'r'r't'tV'f'»«9-'*l»Tr' W» t^

                                                                              m eo <>5
                                                                              2*6
                                                                              5 <  >
                                             118
                                                                                                                 a.

                                                                                                                 a
                                                                                                                 a
                                                                                                                 a
                                                                                                                 eg
                                                                                                                 OJ
                                                                                                          IB
                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                          a
-------
          a3     £
          JS ™
             3  I
                 ft.
             3
              S

             .
                _-D


                S
          s .2 .S  fc,
          3
          O
                •o b

                2 5-
   o
 S  D.


 §  I

05  «
*  S
 B [5
 u UJ


O
8 52     SR
t* ^  ^"     ^ QO
                                                                                                     ^

                                                                                                     00

      f>     o  m ?*
      *t     
                             T-i
                                                                     119

                                                                                                                                                  a

                                                                                                                                                  E
                                                                                                                                                 a
                                                                                                                                                 a

                                                                                                                                                 o
                                                                                                                                                 3
                                                          O

                                                         TJ
                                                          O

                                                          a

                                                          CD

                                                          C
                                                         —


                                                         Q
-------
 APPENDIX A-2




GAS TRAIN DATA
      120
-------
5?
Si
O D,
'«
O E
              w  V)V1V1V1V1    VIVIV)

                            dddddo*    odd
                            VJVJVjVJVlV)    VIVIV)


                            •rf^f't't^'*    Tf'*'*
                            d  d d d d  d    odd
                            oo
                            vo
                                            o
                                            oo
                               O V) VI VI  O
                               vi rj- Tt •*  vq

                               d d d d  d
                                               V) O O
                                               t NO VI

                                               d o* o
                            VIVIVIVIVIV)    VIVIVI
                               OOOOOO    OOO
                            oo-HP4N^;'t    ^civq
                            •"tONON-*1*    Ott*!

                            ONONOOOO    OOO
                            r^ppooNONq    Nqpoq

                            d<-!-
                                                  121
-------
   ON
   »H

T-( <*>





O »-;
«H »-<



g|




(3 8


•ll

^o


3 §

O E
 en w  O '"'

 1 S  s S
               o
o|S i
   Q- M* ^
58-5
CQ "Q .b *T
   nw CL ^^
   CC ^j 'T

^1
                VI CQ
                CC U9
               r»"» U


               °ifi
     «

     E.B
a 8-a^
o a «  s
   B« tfl
*^l
m    E
<:
O .tl
     £
       .s
o


H
        in in in in vi o   in o vo
        q o q q q »-j   q 55 o

        o o o o o o   do o
             vi in in in
                            invjvjvjvjvj   «n in vj

                            ^r •*•«*•«* >viin
             O«-«-'-i-iO    ON'H,
                            O ON  Ov ON ON Ox    ON Ov ON

                            p5tN
-------


1
52




£







«•> o
2' 3
t
1-H
* fifi
i i2
O D-
** E
«
ii
a!
0 E
eg 09 O ^7
£J ^—
°£||
2|
                                                         TJ
                                                         O
123    S
                                                         ra



                                                         Q
-------
  CO
   M
'.2
O E
1

i
              «  w o '""''
              fillSl
                 e i.
                £« s
                B-   £
              oi
         &
ojrp



<      ^
                   i
                          oooooooooo   ooo
                          •* •»* t TJ- TT ifr ••*•*•*•«*•   TfrJ-Tj-
                          OOOOOOOOOO   OOO
                          r»t^r»r-«^c-t-r»r-r-   r*r-p«
                          ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON   ON ON ON
                          OOOOOOOOOO   000
                                                                                   O)

                                                                                   f
                                                                                   a
                          o -H — i (s 01 mm
                                     S * o
                                     s s <
                                                                                   a

                                                                                  a
                                            124    ~
-------





. I





J2
5






~ 1
N O
7 5
VI
>0
s ^
OS BO
Si
o &
-* E
a "»
• — (19
eg es
£0
a.S
2 «• .2 '•J
o § 'B S
fcl"^
a «.a t
\^ w .S ft
** 2
!!--
a*xi
{2 *~
li|l
** I a
w 8 -a «
• o 1 S J
w ^
I'^II
I- * I
.t: o« r"
•a .ss * ^
gv)«nv)V,«niov»n «ow1«o
d d d d d d d d d d d d

oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo ooj oo
d d d d d d d d o" odd

dddddo'ddd odd

 iflvovo
Nr4ciciMNNP4c4 

                                                              I
                                                              I
                                                              •Q
                                                              JO

                                                              I
                                                              O)
                                                              •c
                                                              Q
125   -
-------


js
S
jz



<3
^ 1
vl C
O •>-«
rH 1-1
*I
°1
Q c
•5 «A
ts «
88
O E .
VlViVlVlV)ViV>
OOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOO
V)V)V>V!V!V)V1V1V>
V1VJV)V1V)V1V1V1V1
oooooooooooooooooo
OOOOOOOOO
0*J C4 C*4 C^ f*i W CO W W
OOVlVlOOOOO
OOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOO
CO CO C*V CO CO CO CO CO CO
OOOOOOOOO
{sj 1—4 TH O\ ^^ ^^ O* O\ ^?
^O c^ C? c^ C3 c^ G3 ^^ C3
O'-*C4CJC^C^^t"
^ S <
r-*
o
®
5=
•s
•o
JO

i
Q
-------
                 S
*? -M

S  I
  SV)
   (A
re  re
£0
«  «

O E
                         3
                         5
O
                                   O •"••
                                   •5  «
                                     .S
                              2 2<
                                   H


                                 M O
                              _;;  J* *-  «
                              O (S S 3
                              2

                              _c .b
                              a *
                              o
               .b °
               no    00*0

                                          d d d d d d d d o* d o*    o* d o*
                                                                   \o   
D)
O
a=

•5
•a


I
o>
|

Q
-------



•M
.•S

u.
|
1
<








u
«
,-. •£
^ S
0 «
»"* t-H ^*
2 •
to o
Sd,
M

^c T*.
§ E
g w
*« c3
&%
O E

w w ^O ^7
OW P *?
h« *• >
^ I e

o § | S
o* 55
£
fflS^-j
< 0 < 5
"^ e
2 S'ja ^
^i •? ^. .;
CU £
.C
3 a &£
< O | i-
Owe"
£ « *
1=
« 0 ^-
°lp

o ,j* ^ ^7
co < .2 S
as E *
< ^


to .u S ^
<;  fl


in o o o o o
CO ON ON O O *— t


mmmmm mmm
o o o o o ooo
o o o o o ooo
min«n«nin vninin



ooooo ooo
intninmm minm

ON ON ON ON ON ON ON ON
OOOOO OOO


NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
§§££§ £§»
ooooo ooo


«w«w« WWW

ooooo ooo




oooooooooo oooooo
WWWWW WWW


w o w o w jfj r*! *J
* S <
128 3



















c
•s.
c
m
ID
a
O)


"5

0
: I
a
Q
j*^
-------

9 -M
s ft
• iS  (A



8S
O E

II!
S  E
v3  O
  !<»
       .S
SHE
°ll*
8  8-2£
o£ Se
     WJ

O  I- > '"•*
I  < I s

£    Ec
C .i3 56

2<|
Sag
  .«   *-
3-5
             <'•§
|8^

•II
  ^   c
     o

    p
           »-<»H^.
                             129
                                                                           CD


                                                                           1.
                                                                           0)
                                                                           o
                                                                           •o
                                                                           _0

                                                                           &
                                                                           CO


                                                                           Q
-------
?I
'S *B.
•n en
s ra

ll
    O •'""
« to o *•*

o SI ^
  1**
  <   .s
5  a  P
< o  g
     O
             W  Cft O *"*

             Irii
               fc w



             oo  < 5 °
« .is
    b >
       e
     1
          o' o' o' q o. q o. q o q q   q q q
          o'o'o'oo'o'oo'o'oo*   oo'o
                      qqqqqqqqqqq   qqq
          o'ooo'oo'o'cioo'o   o'o*o*
           o' o o o' o o o   »H rt
                                           v)   in m f»
                                           a\   co q o\

                                           d   d i-5 d
                       o o q q q q q q oo q q   co q q
                                   co o
                                   pi co
           OOOOOOOOOOO   O'OO
                                   Tf •"t •*
S^§^8'S8S§^i  S*
                           130
                                                                      0>

                                                                      t
                                                                      CD



                                                                      §
                                                                                  °o
                                                                                  o


                                                                                  I
                                                                                  CO

                                                                                  •c

                                                                                  0
-------




i
0*
£







£






vT *
(/I o
2 5
i
V)
VI
o
1-1 «-H
\o BO
i »-*
•H B.
^ E
a*
03 Cy
5?
O E
tn w tj /-;
^i^
10 «B O <"•
OS * °-
i- 3 |J
^^H
^ S •- 'JJ
"*"!
•« S !6
.S
fli|E
rl 8 '1 ^
U !•> 5 ft
SU 2 *
S s -a -

|'| Id
l'Ei
.c
3 1 E
S '^« o o
.c
.ts .a • 'j
« *
>-
1 o «i ^
n *
c
•51 ^
1 1
E
P

d d d d d d d d d o' d d d
V1V)V1V1V1V)V>V1V1V1 «OV»V1
d d d d d d d d d d odd

VIV^VIV^VIVIV^V^VIVJ V^lOVl
oooooooooocooooooooo oooooo
ddddddo'o'o'd ooo

IO ^^ ^1 ^D ^D ^D \Q \O ^D ^D ^3 ^D
ssssssssss s?s
OOOOOOOG3OO OOO
• ViV}VlViViV(VlV*ViVl VlVilA
NNNNNC»NNN
-------
T-H O

*"* £2,


    M



It
.s  «
 CS  M
£0
O  E
c

       O
       S  s  .a T:
       o  §  3  ?-
       03
       ^^•^?
       ^ s  *•  -
                     *  S!  '3


                     °li
                     as  «  O '*"'

                     I  fill
       <
oa .ss  %
«°
       E
        o


       H
                                      inmmminmviininin     inmin
                                      q  q q  q q q  q q  q q     qqq
                                      o"  d o  d d d  o d  6 d     odd
                                                vjininminmin     mmm
                        q  q q  q q  q q  q q q     qqq
                        ininininini/iininmin     inmm
                                      ON  ON ON  ON ON  ON ON  ON ON ON     ON  ON ON

                                      d  d d  d d  d d  d d d     odd
                                   s
                                                 NO
                                                    NO NO
                                                                            §
                               00
                                   mmmoomin     o
                        oooooooooo     o  o o
                        qqqqqqq  qqq     qqq
                        oooooooooo     ooo
°i N
•* •*
OOOOOOOOO     Z £ r°«i
   §<*^OCrVOC*lOC^O     £3 1> I*
   o<-<«-ic4c«)<')^>     « 

                                                                                                                            f
                                                                                                                            i
                                                                                                                            •§
                                                                                                                            •Q
                                                                                                                            ,0

                                                                                                                             i
                                                                                                                             O)
                                                                                                                            w

                                                                                                                            Q
-------





'Q

S
s
•^
(2










i







w
^ f
f> M
 2
S n
(i M
o .S
1 •—
jl
<« H
re 3
O E
S3 "* .a ""?
r5 3 5 °.
°£ § *
S .e
8 1 -3 U
O 2 « >
fc <« *
.g

5 E •- 'S
25"*^
£
£ 0 •*» ^
»3 **3 ^ ^
SN PH ?
flJIE
H
« « 0 *T
« S 'S o.
^J W " &•
ft. CO ?
l'l*c
0 £ 1 1
Cfl
|'l||
d u 5 "7
2 "< J "
3f F
w >~
H
— j* > *-:
•§ "<5 o ^
t2 E ^
5-3 7
^C tvi
55 p
;—
s as -b 71
.2 O < ^
B *
.e


•36 C
•< 3 '
g I
u
p

o o o o o o

«n vi in in in in
0 O O O O O



in in in in m m


00 00 00 00 00 00
6 d d d o" o

' * R * 8 8 8

in in in in in in
\J3 y5 \Q \Q \Q \Q
d d d d d d

N P4 0  v>  o
vo ^o so r^
0000

W P4 M M
O O O O
00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00


00 00 00 00
o o o o
-------

!_.
Afterburnei


-91
-1316)
Afterburner
o 2
*I
SI
•la
«11]
2 01 O •»?
1 8 1 §
o.«|
< *
•*—
< 1 3 1
eu s
.S
n in
O\ ON O\ O\ O\ O\
o o o o o o

VO 00 09 O O (*4
in O O m in in
r- oo oo oo oo oo
o o* d'o* 6 o
. o o o o o o
o o o o o o

^ ^
•*•*•*•*•*•»

O fi O O O t*)
O\ O\ O O ^ -H


in in in in
O O O O
o o o o
in in in m

O O O O
•n m in in
OA ON 09 Ov
O O O O

VO vo VO VO
in in o m
oo oo oo oo
o o o o
o o o o
t*l f^ C^ CO
O 0 0 0

C* N CM C»
'*'*'*'*

1888

134
in in in
O O 0
o o o
m m m

000
m in in
00 O* G\
O O O

00 H
in vo vo
O in •*
oo oo oo
0 0 0
000
o o o

N N
"* "* *

*^ V /ta
X-fl rS Q
E
f
 E
 o

I
 O)


D
-------
           APPENDIX A-3




AIR POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM DATA
               135
-------
   Bay Area    10-22-91
   Flue Gas Sampling (1150 - 1319)
                     Secondary APCS


Time

1022
1100
1130
1200
1230
1300
(1) MUST:
MAX:
AVG:
2nd
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.)
4.0
6.0
7.0
11.5
11.5
12.0
7.0
12.0
10.5

Demister
dp
(in w.c.)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Carbon
Bed
Exit Press.
(in w.c.)
14.0
14.0
13.5
19.0
18.0
18.0
13.5
19.0
17.1
1st
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.)
12.5
12.0
12.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
12.0
15.0
14.3
(1) During period of flue gas sampling
                         136
-------
    Bay Area    10-24-91
    Rue Gas Sampling (1146 - 1458)
                      Secondary APCS


Time

1030
1100
1130
1200
1230
1300
1330
1400
1430
1500
(1) MIN:
MAX:
AVG:
2nd
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.)
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.0
6.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
8.5
4.0
8.5
6.3

Demister
dp
(in w.c.)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Carbon
Bed
Exit Press.
(in w.c.)
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.5
15.5
17.5
9.5
17.5
14.1
1st
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.)
8.0
8.5
8.0
8.5
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.5
13.5
15.0
8.0
15.0
12.2
(1) During period of flue gas sampling
                          137
-------
   Bay Area    10-29-91
   Hue Gas Sampling (1155 - 1529)
                     Secondary APCS


Time

1050
1130
1200
1230
1300
1330
1400
1430
1500
(1) MIN:
MAX:
AVG:
2nd
HEPA
dp
fin w.c.)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
1.0

Demister
dp
Cin w.c.')
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Carbon
Bed
Exit Press.
(in w.c.)
7.5
7.5
8.0
7.0
7.0
15.0
14.5
14.5
14.5.
7.0
15.0
12.1
1st
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.)
6.5
6.5
7.0
6.0
7.0
13.5
13.0
13.0
13.0
6.0
13.5
10.9
(1) During period of flue gas sampling
                          138
-------
   Bay Area    10-31-91
   Hue Gas Sampling (1000 - 1304)
                     Secondary APCS
2nd Carbon 1st
HEPA Demister Bed HEPA
Time dp dp Exit Press. dp
finw.c.) (inw.c.) (inw.c.) (inw-c.)
845
900
930
1000
1030
1100
1130
1200
1230
1300
1330
(1) MIN:
MAX:
AVG:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
14.0
12.0
14.5
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.5
14.5
14.5
14.5
14.0
14.5
14.3
12.5
10.5
13.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
12.5
13.0
12.8
(1) During period of flue gas sampling
                          139
-------
    Bay Area    11-05-91
    Flue Gas Sampling (1045 - 1355)
                      Secondary APCS
2nd Carbon 1st
HEPA Demister Bed HEPA
Time dp dp Exit Press. dp
(inw.c.) (inw.c.) (inw.c.) (inw.c.)
917
930
1000
1030
. 1100
1130
1200
1230
1300
1330
1400
(1) MIN:
MAX:
AVG:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
11.5
11.0
11.5
11.5
12.0
12.0
12.5
12.5
13.0
3.0
13.5
3.0
13.5
11.3
9.5
9.5
10.0
10.0
10.5
10.5
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.5
10.0
11.5
10.8
(1) During period of flue gas sampling
                          140.
-------
         Bay Area    11-06-91
         Hue Gas Sampling (1055 - 1355)
                           Secondary APCS
Q


Time

950
1000
1030
1100
1130
1200
1230
1300
q^ i3oo
/ 1400
(1) MUST:
MAX:
AVG:
2nd
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
0.0
2.0
1.1

Demister
dp
(in w.c.)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Carbon
Bed
Exit Press.
(in w.c.)
13.5
14.0
13.5
13,5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.0
13.5
13.0
13.0
13.5
13.4
1st
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.)
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
. 11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.0
11.0
12.0
11.5
    (1) During period of flue gas sampling
                              141
-------
   Bay Area    11-07-91
   Hue Gas Sampling (1010 - 1316)
                     Secondary APCS


Time

900
930
1000
1030
1100
1130
1200
1230
1300
1330
(1) MIN:
MAX:
AVGh
2nd
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.")
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

Demister
dp
Tin w.c.)
0.5
0.5
Q.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Carbon
Bed
Exit Press.
fin w.c.)
13.0
14.0
13.5
13.5
13.0
13.0
13.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
13.5
12.9
1st
HEPA
dp
(in w.c.)
11.5
12.0
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.5
11.2
(1) During period of flue gas sampling
                          142
-------
           APPENDIX A-4




CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITOR DATA
               143
-------
S  9
21.
   a
IU
   E
    -      q q q q q q q q    q  q q q q q   qqq
a Sj 5    ddddd e'e o    d  d d d d d   d o" o
-f *5 3













— V g
     >»





2WI





0?



II] ft"


  " £



  U B








                                            »-<




          q q >n q q in >n in    
-------
               2  Z
               55      o
21.
m  5
u  £
              vcr-r-t-xsvovc^inveininw     «        «  «  •» in     "^  2  3
2  O  gj    «P-p.r>>o«ovo>e«vein.in«««e«w«>e-»«     in  «  «







|  g  |j    op«-. «^vo«o>inoovet-vexsve»in«««»     m


       .c



















        oj
       NM





Id  O  £




    I





                                                                                      t»     cs
        _                                                                             vi     «







    O /ei    oopc»inoe>inc>viinv)v>c>e«npin     o  o  r-.

                                                                                             «  »j<  cj
       .&}     ..-.-.






    Q










<°.










              *-*         »-*l-*            ^N»^^^tH     ^<^-li^«Hi-4v-4^4






    ..        envtovtoviovioviovioviotnovioo
    e        p«^o«-«tO'(to^tO^rp»?fO'*p^t(O'*p«'i
    B

    H
                                                                                                                                                               O9


                                                                                                                                                               f


                                                                                                                                                               a
                                                                                                                                                               a

                                                                                                                                                               0)
                                                                                                                                                               
-------
•,-

 "tj
5)
    O  B
    HO
    g  SI

    H
   S        «
                                                                                                                                      "a


                                                                                                                                      a
<-<  n.



21
a  *



2  u


O  E
                 ^  co co a  6
                                            oor»Gie>ooovNfi««omovio
-------
•T?  eo
*?  c

2 1.
    B
•e  u
lU  3
o E
             •go"!
             zz  si
             IS  I
             I o"i
             3 O  o
             V)     ~
                O
                O  a

                    B
             Id's
             2'    ^
             So  s
             u o  e
             co 2  B
                r;  a
             tg
             u o
             eo y
             So"
bd    •—
    4)
    Q

   H
             •H •* « in.Ne  NO m NO m  M  n NO NO_ t-;
             inviininNo'Net^NeNei^NeNeNCNe
                                             oo oq NO in  ON  « ^    >o  m  NO_
                                             •CNCviNevirt^    inr-NO
             333
      o  i-<  N to «j in v»
f- oo in  oo  in
to fo fi  w  w
             e5l'^oi'^fil'^0?>^t^Ttl'^9     °l *":  "t  "2 *? •*! ^     l^^l>:
             WW(*lC4'^»Hi^iHi^o^»^i-iO»^     OOClOi^^^     ^CIO
                   mcsmoooininootnmee     inmomoo
                   «<5<-<^rfi-<9inr»ino!o»-No     t>i»Jri»JNe
                   C^OOt^NONCp^|>NOt^t^OOOOOO     OOOOONNONO
                                                                       O  O  NO

                                                                       i-«  ri  NO
                                                                       •e  ON  t~
                NONONor;r;p;t»t»o6r-i^r»t»t»     r»r~oor»r>
                                einooinin     inincsinotn     o«nine
                ^J 00 in  fl  00 f*l O  <•*  NO O ^ rt  M  (^    (^ d  ON  f*}

                O ON ON  ON  00 00 ON  ON  c^ ON 00 00  00  00    00 00  ON  ^
                                   t-;  O;  o
             O 6 •fl-  O^  00  «    ONONNO
                                eoer)     ^ ^ "5  °;  «
                                060600     oo 06 r^  oo'  o
                                                                                          5 ol
                                                                                                       o  in *•*
                                                                       NO  ON NO

                                                                       t^  ON 00
                                                                                          l~; O O

                                                                                          'f CB NO
                                                                                          .-» m in
                                                                                          NO « oo
inomeinomoinomemoineminininin     2XO

o\ONONOOoo^rti-<<-ic»CN»t>«N«tn<»)^'«in     C<>
                                                                                                              a


                                                                                                              Q.


                                                                                                              a
                                                                                                              a
                                                                                                              a
                                                                                                              eg
                                                                                                              o>

                                                                                                              CD
                                                                 •B
                                                                 O
                                                                 —
                                                                 CD
                                                                 Q.

                                                                 09


                                                                 —


                                                                 a
                                                                    147
-------
in ...

v>eeooc>o
-------
ii"* *5
11 a
   a
u 2
O b
•g0NCI
2 0
SO


| O I    ^««««««M««m««WW«««««««


ji  «/
55

                                    oqinpaqoooineaineooao          oeor-
   *l

B P. |
   D *
   D








1/2 u ^    aootosasooodooadedodosoaosodoaoooooaeNetON          ooo\oo





— -~* ^i    '^°;<<5^wJ>'50?            ;.;
            i^    ^M          1-1                                     i-t  f^              1-1

    .,       O O O V) O VI O V) O V) O V) O V)  O  VI  O  V)  O  O  O  O  O    2  ^£ Q
    v       *w tft ft ^ nn v* f^ —^ fn «» j*^ ^ fA ^*  A  —*  m  ^  A  m  ^  fn  ^    r™!  7j >*
                                                                                                                                    a
                                                                                                                                    ra
                                                                                                                                    a
                                                                                                                                    a
                                                                                                                                    eo
O
Q.
9
•S
3
                                                               149
-------
S  2
*4 *w
«i  n.
   S
II a
  H
18
     a
e-.i
So
Z    a)
U O E
to 1C
  8
=
  P
                                                             wi >o vi  
                                                               vi r^ ^e
                                                                                              a

                                                                                              a
                                                                                              •o
                                                                                              5

                                                                                              i
                                                                                              Q
                                        150
-------
     APPENDIX B




OPERATING DATA PLOTS
         151
-------
          APPENDIX B-l




KILN AND AFTERBURNER OPERATION
              152
-------
(7)
CM
o
 o

 Zj
 .Q.
 2
• <


 Q
 ^.
 .<
 CO
00
UJ
I-
CL
O
CJ
                                c?1
                                             &
                                             N—'



                                              U
                                              2
                                                           S
                                                               I

                                                                'eb    + -
                                                                fc?    +

                                                                ~    ^
                                                                 m
                                                                 4-1

                                                                I
                                                                          CM
                                                             a-
                                                             \o
                                                                               o
                                                                              Q
0)
E
                                       153
-------
^—  o

O)  i
\   CL

 (N  0
 O
     co
„-,--,—-,-   "y
     O

b;   %
(j)   ^
i  i   °L
uJ   o
'I
 I

 I
                     i
             vu
            ,|  n

                                      ff
                                             s
                                                                              o
                                                                              Q
rat
                                                        R
                                                              §
                                                              vO
                                        154
-------
en  5
\   a.
cn  %

C\j  Q

NX\ <

o  p

*    LJ
X	S >
     Ld
CO
LJ
        Tl

                             2
                            a
                                   •.
                                   2
                                                                     00

                                            CO

                                         /  t5
                                                                     CO
                                                                         o
                                                                         Q
                                                                         
-------
 O
Q
-------
      o

CD  -5
      UJ
J
               I
                                               •S
                                                o

                                              1
                                                           3
                                                !
  o

157
                                                       •••     O^
                                                                    I
                                                                    'ti
                                                                    I
                                                     )    54
                                                                      Q
                                                                      in
                                                                      O^
                                                                                                    D
                                                                                                   Q
                                                                              I
                                                                              2

                                                                                              O)
                                                                    O
                                                                    cs
-------
 CD  OL
\.   2

 CD
     Q
     Z




     I
     LJ
LO
(/)
I   I  "J-1
LJ  Q,
.1
I
I
I
                CO
                •a
                                                I
                                                            r
                                                                       D
                                                                      Q

                                                                      M—
                                                                       o



                                                                       E
                                                     I
                                                                    ai
                                          °S    8
                                            —.    c\

                                         158
-------
CD
    o
    2
    _l
    Q_

    <
    00

    Q
    Z
    <

    00
    UJ

    bJ
Q.
O
             Tl
           to    •§

           is i I
                        s
                            S1

                                   I
                                         J
                                                  
-------
                     APPENDIX B-2




SCRUBBER EXIT AND STACK CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORS
                         160
-------
cr>
CM
C\l
o
     to
    2
    •LU
    o
    X
    bJ
w §
UJ m
i- i
o
    o
    CO
Q_
o
O
00
                                s
                                    I
                                                                 I
                                                                  I
                                                              0)
                                                                        CD
                                                                             O
                                                                            Q
                                                                             0)

                                                                             E
                         in
                                                  °§
                                       161
-------
CM
O     x
     UJ
     LU
     m
     CO
     Z)
     o:
     o
     CO
00
UJ
h-
I
                        UJ
                 ^5     "S
                 •S   H  8
                                     o m

                                               8
                                               jj
                                                     —    o
                                                                              CD
                                                                    CM
                                                                  a
                                                                  VO
D
Q
                                          162
-------
O)
CN
    in
UJ
O
    Ox
    LJ
CN
    GO
    m
    o
    CO
00
LJ
•I

                           £
                                    I
                                    8

                                    1

                                    I
                                                                  00
                                                                  D
                                                                  Q
                                                                  CM
                         a
                                             —    00
                                                        VC
                                   163
-------
r->
O
     LU
     O
     x
     LU
     m
     OQ

     §
C/)
LLJ
1—
 D
O
>*-
 O


 E
                                           164
-------
LO
o

t
X
LJ

o:

m
     o
     C/)
GO
LJ
                       I
                   to
                  •a
                                              8
                                              4J
                                                           6"
                                  o ui    o

                                    rj
                                                                      1
                                                                           -r
                                                                            T
                                                                        T
                                                                                          a
                                                                                          Q
                                                                                     CD

                                                                                     E
                                                                          -^





                                                                          I
                                                                        a
                                                                        vO
                                              165
-------
CD
    o
    x
    UJ
    UJ
    m
o
CO
LJ
                 I
            UJ
           ,1
§13!Is S o
              CO
              •a
                           3
                           8
                                §•
s
                                            I
                                                     e
                                                     •3
                                                                D
                                                                Q

                                                                it-
                                                                CD



                                                                E
                                                                en
                                                ^3 ^^    ^^ ^3    CD
                                  166
-------
      tn
     o
^—  x
     LjJ

J  _ cc
\—^ Ld
     m

CD  §
     ce
     o
     CO
oo
  I


Tl


 •I
                 03
                 ^
                               I
                                        f1
                                          §"
                       l-i
                       
-------
CM
      
-------
CN   „



e^§
    oo
CO
UJ  -
I—
           *s   J9
           TO   iH
           U   tO
                                      CO
                                          8
                                          CO
                                                                     CD
                                                                         O

                                                                         Q
                                                                         0)

                                                                         E
                                                         ti
                                                          a
                                     169
-------
                                                       00
en
CM  co
O
C\I

h-
00
LJ
      ii
       T
Tl

  i
            CO
            •a
                             u

                             M
                               ff
                               -
                               CO
                                 iJ
                                  8

                         S4
                                                           D
                                                           Q
                                                           
-------
cr>
 CO

2
UJ
oo
LJ
              "S   _5
               TO   1—1
               U    CO
                                              o.
                                              CO
                                              1-1
                                              H
                                                       8
                                                              --    o
                                                                                           CM
                                                                                                 0

                                                                                                 Q
                                                                                                 CO

                                                                                                 E
                                                                           I
                                                                                           00
                                                                             8
                                                                             VO
                                                171
-------
(J>
\
LO
     1 1 1
     0
00
LJ
I—
I
I

I

                                   8"
                                   en
                                8
                                                    CO
                                                          •
                                                            I
                                                             i

                                                              0)
                                                                     m
o
Q
                                                                          (D
                                                                          E
                                      172
-------
CD


CD
LO
     en

     2
     Ld
     O
     (fi
00
LJ
                      I
             0)

             "S   i2
             tg in ij
                                                8
                                                                 &
                                                                 3
                                                                  a
                                                                               LO
 X
 O
a

M—
 O

 0)

 E
                                                                           O
                                          173
-------
CD
      tn

     2
     UJ
     o
     C/)
Ul
UJ
I
          IQ O  TO 2J  fl) IQ
                                                     8
                                                             CO
                                                          o -    o
                                                                          a
                                                                                        CO
                                                                CM
                                                                     D
                                                                     Q

                                                                     >-4~>

                                                                     o
                                                                                        CX3
                                               174
-------
                                    APPENDIX C




                           LABORATORY ANALYSIS DATA








        In the analytical reports that follow, test program samples are identified by a unique




sample identifier. Table C-l outlines the convention for assigning sample identifiers.  Table C-2




summarizes the test sample identifiers for the samples collected in the test program.  Table C-3




summarizes the identifiers for the blank samples prepared. Table C-4 summarizes the identifiers




for the matrix spike samples prepared.
                                         175
-------
                 TABLE C-l.  IRF SAMPLE IDENTIFIER CONVENTION
Form of Sample Identifier
YMDDHHMM 12345
Original Generation Suffix
Original Generation
Y- Year, last digit: 1 - 91, 2 =» 92, etc-
M- Month:
Jan-1, Feb-2, Mar-3, Apr-4. May-5. Jun-6,
Jul-7. Aug-8, Sep-9. Oct-A. Nov-B, Dec-C
DD— Day, numeric
HH » Hour, numeric 24 hour convention
MM— Minute, numeric
Suffix
1 •> Sample type: 2 »
A Afterburner exit flue gas
B Scrubber liquor
E Scrubber exit flue gas
F Feed
K Kiln exit flue gas
P Preburn feed
Q Prepared in laboratory
S : Stack gas
T Ash
Z Other


3 *• Sample Fraction 4 =»
0 Total sample
1 ' Individual impinger or impactor stage 1
2 Individual impinger or impactor stage 2
3 Individual impinger or impactor stage 3
4 Individual impinger or impactor stage 4
F F»lter
I Combined impingen
M Probe wash H- Impinger
P Probe wash + Filter
W Probe wash
X Sorbent resin (XAD-2)
Z Other





















Sampling Procedure
0
A
C
F
G
H
M
P
R
S
V
Z
Not Applicable \
Cascade impactor
Composite
Fluoride train (13B)
Grab
Mercury train (101A)
Multiple metals train
Method S (particuiate/HCl)
Arsenic train (108)
Modified Method S (0010)
VOST(0030)
Other
Preparation Procedure
0
B
D
E
F
G
H

M
N

S
T
W
Z
None
Organic extract in Benzene
Digestion or fusion digestate
Aqueous leachate - EP toricity
Filtration Filtrate
Organic extract in Hexane
Organic extract in Hexane of
TCLP leachate
Organic extract in Methyiene chloride
Organic extract in Methyiene chloride
of TCLP leachate
Filtration solids
Aqueous leachate - TCLP
Aqueous leachate - Water
Other
5 —   QA Description
      0        Not applicable
      D       Split sample duplicate
      S        Spiked sample
      P        Spiked sample duplicate
      L       Lab blank
      M       Method blank
      F       Field blank
      T       Trip blank
      Z       Other
                                             176
-------
1
O
u
o
1
B
u
Ed

pa
    cc
L0835FG
       g
28
o
       S
•o
u
.u
             a o
             gg
             sl
             ss
             pa pa
             O
115
       |
                  •8
           1
•g
•S

I
                        CO CO
                 $$*
                              S eo  > > >
                              S w  www
                              3 Q  \o "^ o
                              S S  23 ?!!! 25
                              1= O.  O TH CM
                              9 S SSS S

                              i
                   w
<
«  S^g  »?
TH  n co co  TH
TH  TH TH T-i  TH
                a

                "8
                *J

                -i

                1  i
                JJ  T3
                .&  g
                                   P-  S S
                                   w  § s

                                   III
                                   5  S S
                                   «  t r-
                                  CO
                                                  i
                                                  1
                                                  1
                                                  •o

                                                  it
                                                     CO
i
                                                        .a
                                    177
-------
                      TABLE C-3.  BLANK SAMPLES ANALYZED
Analyte class
Matrix ' Trace metals
Reagent water
Extraction solvent
Scrubber system makeup 1B060955BGOOF
1B070855BGOOF
Semivolatile .
HC1 organics
1B111600QGOMM
1B131500QGOMM
1A241510QOOMM
1B060955BGOMF
1B070855BGOMF
Volatile organics
1A281300QGOOT
1A281301QGOOT
1B041305QGOOT
1B041306QGOOT
1B051440QGOOT
1B111030QGOOT

1B060955BGOOF
1B070855BGOOF
Multiple metals train filter

Multiple metals train
impinger solution

Method 0030 train trip
blank"
Method 5 particulate, HC1
train impinger solution

Method 0010 train sorbent
resin

TCLP leaching solution
1B071530QMPOM

1B071526QMIOM
                                                   1B041400QVOOT
                                                   lB11133pQVOOT
                                                   lA281000QVOOTb
                1B071525QPIOM
                                 1A241520QOXMM
                                 1A291014QZXMO
1A291615QGOTM
•Field blanks listed in Table C-2.
'Trap broken during shipment or analysis.
                                            178
-------
                TABLE C-4.  MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLES ANALYZED
Matrix
Sludge feed
Kiln ash
Scrubber liquor

Trace metals
1B010830FGOOO
1B051355TGOOO
1B051626BGOOO
Analyte class
Semivolatile
HCI organics
1B010830FGOMS
1B010830FGOMP
1B061355TGOMS
1B061355TGOMP
1A241722BGOMS

Volatile organics*
1B010835FGOOO,
MS
1B051355TGOOO,
MS/MSD
1B071750BGOOO,
                                                    1A241722BGOMP   MS/MSD
TCLP leachates:

 Sludge feed

 Kiln ash

Multiple metals trains:

 Filter


 Impinger solution

Method 0010 train
sorbent resin

Method 5 participate,
HCI train impinger
solution
1B010830FGOTO

1B051355TGOTO
1B110940QZPOO
1B110941QZPOO

1B051047EMIOO
                              1A311100QOXMS
                              1A311100QOXMP
               1B061100APIOS
               1B061100APIOP
               1B071055EPIOS
               1B071055EPIOP
aMethod 0030 train matrix spike samples listed hi Table C-2.
                                         179
-------
                      APPENDIX C-l




PROXIMATE, ULTIMATE, AND ASH FUSION TEMPERATURE ANALYSES
                           180
-------
Mr. Dennis Tabor
Acurex Corporate Lab
Highway 65 North/Building 45
Jefferson, Arkansas  72079
                                       December 16, 1991
                                       Received:  Nov. 19th
Dear Mr. Tabor:

Analysis of your compounds gave the following results:
Your #,

1B181350-
FCOOO
Our .#,     Proximate Analyses,

T-8224       As Received,
               % Loss on Drying at 105°C
               % Karl Fischer Water
               % Volatile Material at 105°C

             Dry Basis,
               % Volatiles, at 900°C
                 inert atmosphere
               % Ash
               % Fixed Carbon

           Analyses,

             Dry Basis:
               % Carbon
               % Hydrogen
               % Kjeldahl Nitrogen
               % Chlorine
               % Sulfur
               % Ash
               % Oxygen by Difference

             As Received,
                 BTU/pound
55.26
39.62
15.64
                                                              38.25
                                                              59.71
                                                              2 = 04
                                                              19.02
                                                              1.28
                                                              2.17
                                                              3.53
                                                              3.72
                                                              59.71
                                                              10.57
                                                              5340
                                  181
-------
Mr. Dennis Tabor
Page 2
December 16, 1991
Your #,      Our #,     Proximate Analyses,              ;

1B181355-    T-8225       As Received,                   |
FCOOO                       % Loss on Drying at 105°C          53.24
                            % Karl Fischer Water               46.84
                            % Volatile Material at 105°C       6.40

                          Dry Basis,
                            % Volatiles at 900°C
                              inert atmosphere                 16.87
                            % Ash                        •  •    83.13
                            % Fixed Carbon                     <0.5

                        Analyses,

                          Dry Basis:
                            % Carbon                           4.59
                            % Hydrogen                         0.45
                            % Kjeldahl Nitrogen                0.15
                            % Chlorine                         <0.14
                            % Sulfur                     :      12.67
                            % Ash   .                     '83.13
                            % Oxygen by Difference             <0.1

                          As Received,
                              BTU/pound                        5376
                               182
-------
Mr. Dennis Tabor
Acurex Corporate Lab
Highway 65 North/Building 45
Jefferson, Arlcansas  72079
                                      January 9, 1992
                                      Received:  Dec. 20th
                                      P0#:  ES31460Z
Dear Mr. Tabor:

Analysis of your compounds gave the following results:

Your #,       Our #,            Analyses,
1C171500PC
000
1A311315TG
000
U-2116
Initial
H/W
1/2 H/W
Fluid Temperature

U-2119
              Initial
              H/W
              1/2 H/W
              Fluid Temperature
% Carbon             11.11
% Hydrogen           6.39
% Kjeldahl Nitrogen  0.23
% Total Halogens
  Calculated as Cl   1.77
% Oxygen             37.01

Ash Fusion Temperature,
Oxidizing,           Reducing,
                                  1940°F
                                  1990°F
                                  2110°F
                                  2140°F
                     1940°F
                     2050°F
                     2100°F
                     2160°F
Ash Fusion Temperature,
Oxidizing,           Reducing,
                    1960°F
                    1990°F
                    2110°F
                    2210°F
                     2200°F
                     2230°F
                     2260°F
                     2340°F
                                  183
-------
Mr. Tabor
Page 2
January 9, 1992
Your #,

1B071320TG
000
Our #,

U-2120
.Analyses,

  Ash Fusion Temperature>
  Oxidizing,           Reducing,
              Initial
              H/W
              1/2 H/W
              Fluid Temperature
                    2700°F
                    Out of Range
                    Out of Range
                    Out of Range
                       2700°F
                       Out of Range
                       Out of Range
                       Out of Range
                               184
-------
                                                                                      Page 1 of 1
                                                                     Project:      Bofors-Nobel
Bulk Density Report                                                            Superfund Site
By Method ASTM 5057                                     Report Number:            BOF-5
                                                                   Revision:                 0
Sample ID Number      1A231100FGOOO 1B010830FGOOO 1A241500TGOOO  1BOS1355TGOOO
Master Index Number          1169               1332               1212              1405
Lagoon Number                3838

Collection Date              10-23-91            11-01-91           10-24-91            11-05-91
Analysis Date                01-03-92            01-03-92           01-03-92            01-03-92 .

Bulk Density (g/ml)            1.36               1.37               1.20              0.92
               Analyst "*-J r-~ i** '   C¥^\-^~\	        Date
         Lab SupftrvisnPT-^. •«-1x>v»XA -c~\     I  t*^0yr^_            Date          )   /
                                               185
-------
       APPENDIX C-2




VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSES
            186
-------
                                                                                 January 10,1992
    Charlie King
    Acurex Corporation
    c/o NCTR Bldg. 45
    Jefferson, AR 72079

    Dear Mr. King:

           This letter outlines the analysis of the Bofer-Nobel Superfund site for Volatile Organic
    Compounds (VOCs).  The following sample types were received and were given Acurex Eastern
    Regional Office sample identification numbers (Appendix A):  6 sludges, 16 waters, 51 VOSTs,
    and 6 soils.

           The analysis was performed according to SW-846 method 8240 (5040VOST) gas
    chromatography/mass spectrometry for VOCs. This method is applicable for all sample types received,
    regardless of water content.  The practical quantitation limit (POL) of the method for an individual
    compound is approximately 5 ug/kg for soil/sediment samples, and 5ug/L for waters. The PQLs will be
    proportionately higher for samples which require dilution or reduced sample size to avoid saturation of
    the mass spectrometer detector.  All sludge samples were diluted; therefore, the POL was higher for
    the sludge samples.  Also, surrogate compounds for the sludge samples (diluted after high level
    extraction) were not detectable.

           We encountered two problems with the samples received.  The sludge, water, and soil samples
    demonstrated a matrix interference with the first internal standard.  When matrix interference occurred,
    the target analyte(s) and surrogate(s) associated with the first internal standard were calculated using
    the next eluting internal standard free of matrix interference. This calculation gave accurate results.
    The second problem was that we received the following VOST samples broken (in transit):

           •   1A281000QVOOT                  •  1B071045EVOOS
           •   1A291205EVOOO                  •  1B051215EVOOO
           •   1A311130EVOOO                  •  1B061115AVOOO
           •   1A241335EVOOO .                 -  1B071045EVOOF

   The analytical results for all sample types are illustrated in Table 1.  The QA/QC results are in Table 2.
    I certify that this data package is technically complete. Release of the data in this hard copy data
   package has been approved by the Laboratory Manager and Analyst, verified by the below signatures.
                                                 Alston Sykes, Laboratory Manager
                                                 Mjjchell Howell, Chemist
P.O. Box 13109, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • 4915 Prospectus Drive, Durham, NC 27713  (919)544-4535 FAX: (919) 544-5690

                                          Division Headquarters
        485 Clyde Avenue, P.O. Box 7044, Mountain View, CA 94039  (415)961-5700 Telex: 325961  FAX: (415) 964-5145
                                                187
-------
TABLE 1. SAMPLE RESULTS
          188
-------
 Project:   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                     PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                     N/D - Not Detected
                     N/A-Not Applicable
                     J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type
1A281300QGOOT
      1223
     Water
1B041305QGOOT   1BO/H440QGOOT
     1343              1361
     Water             Water
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

10/28/91
10/29/91
ug/L

11/4/91
11/7/91
ug/L

11/5/91
11/13/91
ug/L



PQL
ug/L
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodrfluoromethane           ND
 Chloromethane                  ND
 Vinyl chloride                    ND
 Bromomethane                  ND
 Chloroethane                    ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane            ND
 1,1-Dichloroethene               ND
 Acetone                        ND
 Methylene chloride               ND
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
 1,1-Dichloroethane               ND
 Chloroform                      ND
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane           "  ND
 Carbon tetrachloride              ND
 Benzene     .                   ND
 1,2-Dichloroethane               ND
 Trichloroethene                  ND
 1,2-Dichloropropane              ND
 Bromodichloromethane            ND
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                        ND
 Octane                         ND
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
 Tetrachloroethene                ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                   ND
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                    ND
Total xylenes                     ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
 5
 10
 10
 10
 10
 S
 S
100
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 10
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
                                            189
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                       PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit
                       N/D • Not Detected
                       N/A-Not Applicable
                       J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
  1A281300QGOOT
       1223
       Water

      10/28/91
      10/29/91
       ug/L
                        1B041305QGOOT   1BO/H440QGOOT
                              1343              1361
                             Water             Water
                             11/4/91
                             11/7/91
                              ug/L
11/5/91
11/13/91
  ug/L
PQL
ug/L
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-DIchlorobenzene
1 ,4-DIchlorobenzene
1 ,2-DichIorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
5
5
5
5
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
106
99
102
104
99
95
101
108
100
Date
/' *?'
                                     Laboratory Manager.
                                                       Date
                                                      n   T
                                             190
-------
 Project   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL- Practical .Quantitation Limit
                      N/D - Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type

 Collection Date
 Analysis Date
 Concentration
1B111030QGOOT
      1519
     Water

    11/11/91
    11/12/91
      ug/L
1B041306QGOOT   1A281301QGOOT
      1344              1224
     Water             Water
    11/4/91
    11/7/91
      ug/L
10/28/91
10/29/91
  ug/L
                                                                                      PQL
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
 Chloromethane                  ND
 Vinyl chloride                    ND
 Bromomethane                  ND
 Chloroethane                    ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane            ND
 1,1-Dichloroethane               ND
 Acetone                        ND
 Methylene chloride               ND
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene          ND
 1,1-Dichloroethane               ND
 Chloroform                      ND
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             ND
 Carbon tetrachloride              ND
 Benzene                        ND
 1,2-Dichloroethane               ND
 Trichloroethene                  ND
 1,2-Dichloroprop.ane              ND
 Bromodichloromethane            ND
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                        ND
 Octane                         ND
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene         ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane             ND
 Tatrachloroethene                ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                   ND
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                    ND
Total xylenes                    ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                     5
                     10
                     10
                     10
                     10
                     5
                     5
                    100
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                    10
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                     5
                                             191
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                            POL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                            N/D- Not Detected
                            N/A- Not Applicable
                            J- Detected At Less Than The POL
Sample ID Number
Master Indox Number
Sample Type

Collection Data
Analysis Date
Concentration
      1B111030QGOOT
           1519
           Water

          11/11/91
          11/12/91
           ug/L
                                           1B041306QGOOT    1A281301QGOOT
                                                 1344              1224
                                                Water              Water
                                                11/4/91
                                                11/7/91
                                                 ug/L
10/28/91
10/29/91
  ug/L
PQL
ufl/L_
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoforrn
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobsnzene
1 ^-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
5
5
5
5
Surrogate compounds

1,2-DIchloroathane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorabenzene
             94
             95
             94
                                                 105
                                                 102
  106
   99
  102
Analyst
Date/- ^'
                                      Laboratory Manager
         Date
                                              192
-------
 Project:    Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                     PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                     N/D - Not Detected
                     N/A- Not Applicable
                     J • Detected At Lass Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type
1A291753BGOQT
     1281
     Water
1A311534BGOOr
     1291
     Water
1B41722BGOOO
*    1209
    Water
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

10/29/91
11/7/91
ug/L

10/31/91
11/7/91
ug/L

10/24/91
10/29/91
ug/L



PQL
ug/L
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
 Chloromathane                  ND
 Vinyl chloride                    ND
 Bromomethane                  ND
 Chloroethane            .        ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane            ND
 1,1-Diehloroethene               ND
 Acetone                        ND
 Methylene chloride               16
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene          ND
 1,1-Dichloroethane               ND
 Chloroform                      ND
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             ND
 Carbon tetrachloride              ND
 Benzene                        ND
 1,2-Dichloroethane               ND
 Trichloroethene                  ND
 1,2-Dichloropropane              ND
 Bromodichloromathane            ND
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
 Cia-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                         ND
 Octane                         ND
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
 Tetrachloroethene                ND
 Dibromochloromothane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                   ND
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                    ND
Total xylenes                    ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        16
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                       ND
                       ND
                       ND
                       ND
                       ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        110
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                       ND
                       ND
                       ND
                       ND
                        5
                        10
                        10
                        10
                        10
                        5
                        5
                       100
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                       10
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                        5
                       5
                       5
                                             193
-------
Project:    Bofore-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
         PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
         N/D - Not Detected
         N/A~ Not Applicable
         J-Detected At Less Than The PQL

Sample ID Number
Master Indtx Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

Target Anatytes
Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobanzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
O
1A291753BGOOT
1281
Water
10/29/91
11/7/91
ug/L


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
%
120
90
98
0
1A311534BGOCT
1291
Water
10/31/91
11/7/91
ug/L


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
%
103
93
100

1A241722BGOOO
1209
Water
10/24/91
10/29/91
ug/L


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
%
100
97
' 97






PQL
• ug/L

5
5
5
5
• 5 '
5
;



Date
/'
Laboratory Manager
                                                                            Date
                                              194
-------
  Project:    Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                     PQL- Practical Quantitation Limit
                     N/D - Not Detected
                     N/A-Not Applicable
                     J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type
1B060955BGOOF
     1521
     Water
1B070855BGOOF   1BO51626BGOOO
     1522               1363
     Water             Water
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
11/6/91
11/12/91
ug/L
11/7/91
11/12/91
ug/L
11/5/91
11/12/91
ug/L
PQL
	 "9/L
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
 Chloromethane                  ND
 Vinyl chloride                   ND
 Bromomethane                  ND
 Chloroethane                   ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane            ND
 1,1-Dichloroethene               ND
 Acetone                        ND
 Mothylene chloride          .     36
 Trans-1,2-dichlorbethene          ND
 1,'l-Dichloroethane               ND
 Chloroform                     ND
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             ND
 Carbon tetrachloride              ND
 Benzene                        ND
 1,2-Dichloroethane               ND
 Trichloroethene                  ND
 1.2-Dichloropropane              ND
 Bromodichloromethane            ND
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                         j
 Octane                         ND
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene         ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane             ND
 TeJrachloroethene                ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                   ND
 1,1,2,2-TetrachIoroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                   ND
Total xylenes                    ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        51
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        J
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        22
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        J
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
 5
 10
 10
 10
 10
 5
 5
100
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
10
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
                                             195
-------
Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                            PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                            N/D - Not Detected
                            N/A- Not Applicable
                            J- Detected At Less Than The  PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
      1B060955BGOOF
            1521
           Water

           11/6/91
          11/12/91
            ug/L
1B070855BGOOF   1BO51626BGOOO
     1522               1363
     Water             Water
    11/7/91
    11/12/91
      ug/L
11/5/91
11/12/91
  ug/L
PQL
ug/L
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-DichIorabenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
5
5
5
5
Surrogate compounds
1,2-DIchloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
105
102
102
102
101
89
74
100
107 '
Date
                                     Laboratory Manager

                                              196
-------
 Project   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                     PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                     N/D-Not Detected
                     N/A- Not Applicable
                     J - Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type
1B061607BGOOO 1B061607BGOOODUP 1B071750BGOOO
      1410'              1412               1514
     Water             Water             Water
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

11/6/91
11/12/91
ug/L

11/6/91
11/12/91
ug/L

11/7/91
11/12/91
ug/L



PQL
ug/L
 Target Anarytes

 Dichlorodtfluoromethane           ND
 Chloromethane                  ND
 Vinyl chloride                    ND
 Bromomethane                  ND
 Chloroethane                    ND
 Trichlorofluoromothane            ND
 1,1 -Dichloroethene               ND
 Acetone                        ND
 Methylene chloride               34
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene          ND
 1,1-Dichloroathane               ND
 Chloroform                      ND
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             ND
 Carbon tetrachloride              ND
 Benzene                        ND
 1,2-Dichloroethane               ND
 Trichloroethene                  ND
 1,2-Dichloropropane              ND
 Bromodichloromethane            ND
 2-ehloroothyl vinyl ether            ND
 Cis;-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                        J
 Octane                         ND
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
 Tetrachloroethene                ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                   ND
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                    ND
Total xylenes                    ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        34
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        J
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 20
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND.
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
ND
 5
 10
 10
 10
 10
 5
 5
100
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
1.0
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
                                             197
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL <• Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D- Not Detected
                      N/A- Not Applicable
                      J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
•Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1B061607BGOOO 1B061607BGOOODUP  1B071750BGOOO
      1410              1412              1514
     Water             Water              Water
     11/6/91
    11/12/91
      ug/L
11/6/91
11/12/91
  ug/L
11/7/91
11/12/91
  ug/L
PQL
ug/L
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromofonn
Decane
1 ,3-DichIorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichbrobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
5
5
5
5
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
109
106
105
110
103
103
. 111
91
96
            Laboratory Manager
                                                                          Data //
-------
 Project   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                       PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                       N/D - Not Detected
                       N/A-Not Applicable
                       J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type
1B071750BGOOODUP 1A241500TGOOO
       1516               1213
       Water              Ash
1A291530TGOOO
      1279
      Ash
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
11/7/91
11/12/91
ug/L
10/24/91
11/7/91
ug/kg
10/29/91
11/7/91
ug/kg
PQL
ua/L(kg)
 Target Anafytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
 Chloromethane                  ND
 Vinyl chloride                    ND
 Bromomethane                  ND
 Chloroethane                    ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane            ND
 1,1 -Dichloroethene               ND
 Acetone                        ND
 Methylene chloride               19
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene          ND
 1,1 -Dichloroethane               ND
 Chloroform                      ND
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             ND
 Carbon tetrachloride              ND
 Benzene                        ND
 1,2-Dichloroethane               ND
 Trichloroethene                  ND
 1,2-Dichloropropane              ND
 Bromodichloromethane            ND
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                        J
 Octane                         ND
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene         ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane             ND
 Tetrachloroethene                ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                   ND
 1,1,2,2-TetrachIoroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                    ND
Total xylenes                    ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                           6
                          ND
                           J
                           5
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          10
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          10
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          100
                          ND
                          ND
                          J
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
       6
      ND
       J
      15
      ND
      ND
       J
      ND
      ND
       J
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      J
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      J
 5
 10
 10
 10
 10
 5
 5
100
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
10
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
 5
                                            199
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                        PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                        N/D - Not Detected
                        N/A-Not Applicable
                        J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1B071750BGOOODUP 1A241500TGOOO
        1516              1213
       Water              Ash
       11/7/91
      11/12/91
        ug/L
                            10/24/91
                             11/7/91
                              ug/kg
1A291530TGOOO
      1279
      Ash

    10/29/91
     11/7/91
      ug/kg
PQL
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoforni
Decane
1 ,3-Dlchlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dtchlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
' 5
5
5
5
5
5
Surrogate compounds

1,2-DichIoroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
        118
        102
        101
                               116
                               108
      110
      111
       84
Date
               Laboratory Manager
                                                                          Date
                                             200
-------
Project:    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      POL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D - Not Detected
                      N/A- Not Applicable
                      J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A311315TGOOO
      1342
      Ash

    10/31/91
     11/7/91
      ug/kg
1B051355TGOOO
      1508
      Ash

     11/5/91
    11/18/91
      ug/kg
1B051355TGOOODUP
        1508
        Ash

      11/5/91
      11/18/91
        ug/kg
PQL
ug/kg
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
Chloromethano                  ND
Vinyl chloride                .    ND
Bromomethane                  ND
Chloroethane                    ND
Trichlorofluo.romethane            20
1,1-Dichloroethene               ND
Acetone                        ND
Methylene chloride               31
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene          ND
1,1 -Dichloroethane               ND
Chloroform                      ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane             ND
Carbon tetrachloride              ND
Benzene                        ND
•l,2-Dichloroethane               ND
Trichloroetheno                  ND
1,2-Dichloropropane              ND
Bromodichloromethane            ND
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether           ND
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene           ND
Toluene                         J
Octane                         ND
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene         ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane             ND
Tetraehloroethene                ND
Dibromochloromethane            ND
Chlorobenzene                  ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
Ethyl benzene                   ND
Total xylenes                     J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         75
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND"
                         ND
                         42
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         37
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         13
                         11
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         55
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         42
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         37
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         13
                         11
                            5
                           10
                           10
                           10
                           10
                            5
                            5
                           100
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            S
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                           10
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                            5
                                             201
-------
 Project:   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D - Not Detected
                      N/A- Not Applicable
                      J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Data
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A311315TGOOO
      1342
      Ash

    10/31/91
    11/7/91
     ug/kg
      1B051355TGOOO 1B051355TGOQODUP
            1508              1508
            Ash               Ash
           11/5/91
          11/18/91
            ug/kg
                                                11/5/91
                                               11/18/91
                                                 ug/kg
PQL
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromofonn
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
5
5
5
5
Surrogate compounds

1.2-Dichloroothana d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobanzene
      76
      99
      92
             97
            111
            106
                                                 165
                                                 109
                                                 100
Data  -t-
Laboratory Manager 7.
                                                 Date /
                                                                                //f •
                                             202
-------
Project:    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
N/p - Not Detected
N/A-Not Applicable
J - Detected At Less Than The  PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

Target Analytes
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1 ,1 -Dichloroethone
Acetone
Methylene chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Biomodichloromethane
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
Cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene
Toluene
Octane
Trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Totrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
1B061355TGOOO
1510
Ash
11/6/91
11/18/91
ug/kg


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
ND
ND
28
ND
ND
J
' ND
ND
44
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
36
ND .
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
ND
11
9
1B071320TGOOO
1512
Ash
11/7/91
11/18/91
ug/kg


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6
ND
ND
J
ND
ND
39
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
39
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
13
14
1 B071320TGOOODUP
1512
Ash
11/7/91
11/18/91
ug/kg


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4
ND
ND
J
ND
ND
38
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
36
" ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
12





PQL
ug/kg

5
10
10
10
10
5
5
100
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
                                              203
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data '
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quanfitatton Umit
                      N/0 - Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1B061355TGOOO
      1510
      Ash

     11/6/91
    11/18/91
      ug/kg
1B071320TGOOO 1B071320TGOOODUP
      1512              1512
      Ash               Ash
     11/7/91
    11/18/91
     ug/kg
11/7/91
11/18/91
 ug/kg
PQL
ug/kg
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoforrn
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
5
5
5
5
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloroathane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
      102
      113
      95
      118
      113
      101
  118
  108
  98
                   Date /-9>-9f.£    Laboratory Manager /(
-------
 Project:   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                       PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                       N/D- Not Detected
                       N/A-Not Applicable
                       J - Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type

 Collection Date
 Analysis Date
 Concentration
1A211530FGOOO
      1203
     Sludge

    10/21/91
    10/31/91
      ug/kg
1A280900FGOOO   1A281030FGOOO
      1273               1276
     Sludge             Sludge
    10/28/91
     11/7/91
      ug/kg
10/28/91
11/7/91
 ug/kg
                                                                                          PQL
                                                                                          ug/kg
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Methylene chloride
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bramodichloromethane
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene
Toluene
Octane
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Totrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
230,000
ND
ND
170,000
ND
ND
2,400,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2,900,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
130,000
ND
ND
120,000
ND
ND
2.400,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2,500,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                           120,000
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                           110,000
                                           .  ND
                                             ND
                                          2,200,000
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                          2,400,000
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                             ND
                                           62,500
                                           125,000
                                           125,000
                                           125,000
                                           125,000
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                          1,250,000
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62.500
                                           62,500
                                           125,000
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                           62,500
                                               205
-------
Project    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                       PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                       N/D - Not Detected
                       N/A- Not Applicable
                       J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
  1A211530FGOOO
       1203
      Sludge

      10/21/91
      10/31/91
       ug/kg
                         1A280900FGOOO
                              1273
                             Sludge

                             10/28/91
                             11/7/91.
                              ug/kg
1A281030FGOOO
      1276
     Sludge

    10/2Q/91
     11/7/91
     ug/kg
PQL
Target Ansilytes
Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-Dichforobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-D!chlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
62,500
62,500
62,500
62,500
62,500
62,500
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
        ND
        ND
        ND
                               ND
                               ND
                               ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
Date
)~ ?'
                                     Laboratory Manager
                                                   Data
                                            206
-------
Project:    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 82-40 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
N/0 - Not Detected
N/A-Not Applicable
J-Detected At Less Than The  PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
' Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

Target Analytes
Diehlorodifluorom ethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
Acetone
Mothylene chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Diehloroethane
Trichloroethene
.1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-ehloroethyl vinyl ether
Cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene
Toluene
Octane
Trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichtoroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
1A231100FGOOO
1205
Sludge
10/23/91
10/29/91
ug/kg


ND
ND
ND
4,300
ND
ND
ND
ND
190,000*
ND
ND
190,000*
17,000
ND
2,500.000*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3,100,000*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
55,000
ND
3,500
13,000
1B010835FGOOO
1360
Sludge
11/1/91
11/13/91
ug/kg


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
ND
ND
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2,400
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
ND
J
J
1B010830FGOOO
1359
Sludge
11/1/91
11/13/91
ug/kg

«
. ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
ND
ND
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
.ND
3,500
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J





PQL
ug/kg

625
1.250
1,250
1,250
1,250
625
625
12,500
625
625
625
625
625
625 .
625
625
625
625
625
1,250
625
625
625
625
. 625
625
625
625
625
625 .
625
                          •-PQLX100
                                              207
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSO
                     PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                     N/D-Not Detected
                     N/A- Not Applicable
                     J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
1A231100FGOOO   1B010835FGOOO   1B010830FGOOO
     1205              1360              1359
     Sludge            Sludge            Sludge
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-DichIorobenzene
1 ,4-DIchIorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichlcfoethaned-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
10/23/91
10/29/91
ug/kg


ND
ND
ND
ND
7,200
4,000 .
%
ND
ND
ND
11/1/91
11/13/91
ug/kg

«
.ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
«
118
100
104
11/1/91
11/13/91
ug/kg


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND .
%
76
105
99


PQL
ug/kg

625
625
625
625
625
625

-


Data h ^'
            Laboratory Manager
                                                                       Date if 3/
                                           208
-------
Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
WO-Not Detected
N/A-Not Applicable
J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

Target Analytes
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane

Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene.
Acetone
Methylene chloride
Trans- 1 ,2-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetraehloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
Cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene
Toluene
Octane
Trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene
1 .1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
1 .1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
1 B01 0830FGOOODUP
1359
Sludge
11/1/91
11/13/91
ug/kg


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3,600
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J





PQL
ug/kg

625
1250
1250
1250
4icn
i25Q
625
625
12500
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
• 625
625
1250
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
                                            209
-------

Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                        PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                        N/D- Not Detected
                        N/A-Not Applicable
                        J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Samplo Typo

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1B010830FGOOODUP
        1359
       Sludge

       11/1/91
      11/13/91
        ug/kg
PQL
ug/kg
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromofonn
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-DichIorobenzene
1 ,2-dichlorobenzene
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
625
625
625
625
625
625
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichlciroathano d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
         73
        103
        110
                                      Laboratoiy Manager
                                                                            Date
                                                       ^   V
                                              210
-------
  Project   Bofors-Nobel
  EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
  By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      POL - Practical Quantitatfon Limit
                      N/D - Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J-Detected At Less Than The POL
  Sample ID Number
  Master Index Number
  Sample Type

  Collection Date
  Analysis Date
  Concentration
1A311200EVOOF
      1326
     VOST

    10/31/91
    11/26/91
    Total ug
1B041400QVOOT
      1345
     VOST

     11/4/91
    11/11/91
    Total ug
1B051115EVOOF
      1395
     VOST

     11/5/91
     12/9/91
    Total ug
                                                                                          PQL
                                                                                        Total ug
 Target AnaJytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
 Chloromethane                   ND
 Vinyl chloride                    ND
 Bromomethane                   ND
 Chioroethane                    ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane            3.4
 1,1-Dichloroethane               0.31
 Acetone                         ND
 Methylene chloride               0.53
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
 1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
 Chloroform                       J
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             0.86
 Carbon tetrachloride               ND
 Benzene                        0.69
 1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
 Trichloroethene                   ND
 1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
 Bromodichloromethane            ND
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                        0.28
 Octane                          0.4
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
• Tetrachloroethene                 ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                  0.034
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Eihyl benzene                   0.026
 Total xylenes                    0.097
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.03
                         ND
                         16
                        0.061
                         ND
                        2.00
                         ND
                         ND
                         J
                        0.36
                         ND
                        0.41
                         ND
                         J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.15
                        0.57
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0,037
                         ND
                         ND
                         J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         48
                         0.07
                         ND
                         4.4
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.77
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.28
                         0.53
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.1
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.11
                        0.14
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                                               211
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Mothod 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                            PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                            N/D- Not Detected
                            N/A-Not Applicable
                            J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

Target Anaiytes
Nonane
Bromofomi
Decane
1 ,3-DichIorobenzena
1 ,4-Dichtorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzena
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
1A311200EVOOF
1326
VOST
10/31/91
11/26/91
Total ug


0.31
ND
0.176
ND
J
ND
%.
63
114
106
1B041400QVOOT
1345
VOST
11/4/91
11/11/91
Total ug


0.38
ND
0.21
ND
0.023
ND
%
128
103
108
1B05111SEVOOF
1395
VOST
11/5/91
12/9/91
Total ug


0.35
ND
0.2
ND
0.083
0.021
%
101
106
96





PQL
Total ug
i
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02




Data   -
                                       Laboratory Manaoar
Date.

                                               212
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D - Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
1BO61120EVOOF  1B111330QQVOOT   1A241220AVOOO
      1441               1520               1201
     VOST              VOST              VOST
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
11/5/91
12/9/91
Total ug
11/11/91
12/9/91
Total ug
10/24/91
11/11/91
Total ug
PQL
Total ug
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
Chloromethane                  0.14
Vinyl chloride                     ND
Bromomethane                    J
Chloroethane                     ND
Trichlorofluoromethane            7.4
1,1-Dichloroethene               0.13
Acetone                         ND
Methylene chloride               0.85
Trans-1,2-dichloroetheno.          ND
1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
Chloroform                        J
1,1,1-Trichloroothane             0.93
Carbon tetrachloride                J
Benzene                       0.53
1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
Trichloroetheno                    J
1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
Bromodichloromethane            ND
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
Toluene                        0.22
Octane                         0.46
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
1,1,2-Trichloroothane              ND
Tetrachloroethone     '             J
Dibromochloromethane            ND
Chlorobenzene                  0.75
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
Ethyl benzene                   0.22
Total xylenes                    0.99
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.21
                         ND
                         49
                         0.41
                         ND
                         0.1
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         1.5
                          J
                         0.65
                         ND
                        0.021
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.64
                        .0.58
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.1
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.11
                         0.34
 ND
 ND
 ND
 2.1
 ND
 2.1
 ND
 0.19
 0.51
 ND
 ND
  J
  J
  J
 0.27
 ND
  J
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 0.11
 0.37
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
  J
 ND
 ND
0.085
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
                                              213
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                           PQL - Practical Quanttatfon Umit
                           N/D - Not Detected
                           N/A- Not Applicable
                           J-Detected At Lass Than Ths PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
      1BO61120EVOOF   1B111330QQVOOT  1A241220AVOOO
            1441               1520              1201
           VOST             VOST             VOST
           11/6/91
           12/9/91
          Total ug
11/11/91
12/9/91
Total ug
10/24/91
11/11/91
Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target Amilytes
Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzerte
1 ,4-D!chIorobenzene
1 ,2-DichIorobenzene

0.36
ND
0.2
ND
J
ND

0.63
ND
0.39
ND
0.87
0.21

0.27
ND
0.18
ND
ND
ND

0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
f
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
77
118
107
69
165
149
100
100
106
Date  ' ^'
                                    Laboratory Manager.
                          Date
                                            214
-------
Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      POL- Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D- Not Detected
                      N/A- Not Applicable
                      J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A241300EVOOO
      1195
     VOST

    10/24/91
     11/6/91
    Total ug
1A241325AVOOO    1A241301AVOOO
      1202               1200
     VOST              VOST
    10/24/91
    11/6/91
    Total ug
10/24/91
11/11/91
Total ug
                                                                                        PQL
                                                                                      Total ug
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
Chloromethane                   ND
Vinyl chloride                     ND
Bromomethane                  0.038
Chloroethane                     ND
Trichlorofluoromethane           0.14
1,1-Dichloroethene                ND
Acetone                         ND
Methylene chloride                ND
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
Chloroform                        J
1,1,1-Trichloroethane               J
Carbon tetrachloride               ND
Benzene                         J
1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
Trichloroethene                   ND
1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
Bromodichloromethane            ND
2-chIoroethyl vinyl ether            ND
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
Toluene                        0.033
Octane                         0.41
Tirans-1,3-dichloropropana          ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
Totrachloroethene                 ND
Dibromochloromethane            ND
Chlorobenzene                    J
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
Ethyl benzene                     J
Total xylenes                    0.04
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.43
                         ND
                         0.19
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                        0.024
                         ND
                         1.7
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.16
                         0.39
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.041
                         ND
                        0.031
                         0.11
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         9.2
                         ND
                        0.845
                         ND
                         0.37
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.41
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.23
                         0.6
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                        0.039
                         0.12
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                                              215
-------
Project    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                            PQL - Practical Quantttation Umit
                            N/D-Not Detected
                            N/A "a Not Applicable
                            J - Detected At Lass Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Data
Concentration
      1A241300EVOOO    1A241325AVOOO
            1195              1202
           VOST              VOST
          10/24/91
           11/6/91
          Total ug
10/24/91
11/6/91
Total ug
1A241301AVOOO
      1200
     VOST

    10/24/91
    11/11/91
    Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target AnuJytes
Nonarte
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-Dichloi obenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzena
1 ,2-Dich!orobenzene
0.28
ND
0.17
ND
ND
ND
0.36
ND
0.29
ND
ND
ND
0.35
ND
0.28
ND
ND
ND
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
             97
             94
             80
  104
  101
  112
      159
      106
      112
Date /- %
                                     Laboratory Manager
                           Date.
                                             216
-------
 Project   Bofore-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Umit
                      N/0 - Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type

 Collection Date
 Analysis Date
 Concentration
1B051140AVOOO
      1391
     VOST

     11/5/91
    12/11/91
    Total ug
1B051110AVOOO    1B051105EVOOO
      1390               1392
     VOST              VOST
     11/5/91
    12/11/91
    Total ug
11/5/91
12/11/91
Total ug
                                                                                        PQL
                                                                                       Total ug
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
Chloromethane                   ND
Vinyl chloride                    ND
Bromomethane                   1.7
Chloroethane                    ND
Trichlorofluoromethane           0.58
1,1-Dichloroethene                ND
Acetone                         ND
Msthylane chloride               0.06
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
Chloroform                       J
1,1,1-Trichloroethane              1.1
Carbon tetrachloride                J
Bonzene                       0.15
1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
Trichloroethene                    J
1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
Bromodichloromethane            ND
2-chloroethyi vinyl ether            ND
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
Toluene                        0.051
Octane                         0.49
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
1.1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
Tetrachloroethene                 0.1
Dibromochloromethane            ND
Chlorobenzene                    J
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
Ethyl benzene                   0.026
Total xylenes                    0.028
                         ND
                         •ND
                         ND
                         0.24
                         ND
                         0.12
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         0.57
                         ND
                        0.077
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.04
                         0.42
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                        0.033
                         0.16
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                        0.25
                         ND
                        0.27
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.2
                          1
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.034
                         ND
                        0.055
                        0.05
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                                               217
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Umit
                      N/D- Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J« Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
 1B051140AVOOO
      1391
      VOST

     11/5/91
     12/11/91
     Total ug
1B051110AVOOO
      1390
     VOST

     11/5/91
    12/11/91
    Total ug
1B051105EVOOO
      1392
     VOST

     11/5/91
    12/11/91
    Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target Annlytes
Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-Dtehlorobanzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-D!ch!orobenzene
0.34
ND
0.21
ND
J
ND
0.3
ND
0.16
ND
ND
ND
0.45
ND
0.25
ND
ND
ND
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloiroethane d-4
Toluene d>8
Bromofluorobenzene
       80
       99
       98
       67
      101
       67
      163
      107
      111
/"9"%f    Laboratory Manaoar 1j.  •$y&~^'
                                                                          Pate
                                              218
-------
  Project:   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D - Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J- Detected At Less Than The  PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type

 Collection Date
 Analysis Date
 Concentration
1B051141EVOOO
      1393
     VOST

    11/5/91
    12/11/91
    Total ug
1B061220AVOOO    1B061147AVOOO
      1440               1429
     VOST              VOST
     11/6791
    12/11/91
    Total ug
 11/6/91
12/11/91
Total ug
                                                                                         PQL
                                                                                       T6talug
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane            ND
 Chloromethane                   ND
 Vinyl chloride                     ND
 Bromomethane                   15
 Chloroethane                     ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane             2.2
 1,1-Dichloroethene                ND
 Acetone                         ND
 Methylene chloride               0.53
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND"
 1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
 Chloroform                       J
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             0.46
 Carbon tetrachloride               ND
 Benzene                        0.56
 1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
 Trichloroethene                   ND
 1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
 Bromodichloromethane             ND
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether             ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                         0.13
 Octane                          0.5
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
 Tetrachloroethene                 ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                    J
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                   0.026
Total xylenes                    0.043
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.29
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                        0.037
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                        0.25
                         ND
                        0.19
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        ND
                        0.031
                        0.44
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                         J
                        ND
                         J
                         J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.79
                         ND
                          2
                          J
                         ND
                        0.087
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                        0.093
                         ND
                        0.022
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.025
                        0.51
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                         J
                         J
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                    0.02
                                              219
-------

Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
POL - Practical Quantitation Limit
N/D = Not Detected
N/A-Not Applicable
J- Detected At Less Than The POL
Sample ID Number =
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
Target Anatytes

Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-DtehIorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroethana d-4
Toluene cl-8
Bromofluorobenzena
lAAOIOCOCIVOOT1 1B061220AVOOO
-iB!>o 1313
affiSBE=vo$T
^fcu/jjopn-' II/D/"i
asfcTo-fol jUfl


0.37
ND
0.19
ND
J
ND
-%
69 .
109
98
1440
VOST
11/6/91
12/11/91
Total ug


0.31
ND
0.19
ND
J
ND
%
67
100
75
1B061147AVOOO
1429
VOST
11/6/91
12/11/91
Total ug


0.33
ND
0.2
ND
ND
ND
%
112
100
84




POL
Total ug
«
I
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
i



                    Data /~e?~9
-------
 Project-   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL • Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D-Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type

 Collection Date
 Analysis Date
 Concentration
1B0616EVOOO
    *
     VOST

    11/6/91
    12/12/91
    Total ug
1B061145EVOOO
      1439
     VOST

     11/6/91
    12/12/91
    Total ug
1B061220EVOOO
      1440
     VOST

     11/6/91
    12/12/91
    Total ug
                                                                                        PQL
                                                                                       Total ug
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
Chloromethane                   ND
Vinyl chloride                    ND
Bromomethane                   1.2
Chloroethane                    ND
Trichlorofluoromethane            ND
1,1-DichIoroethene                ND
Acetone                         ND
Mathylene chloride                ND
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
Chloroform                        J
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane              ND
Carbon tetrachloride               ND
Benzene                       0.44
1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
Trichloroethene                   ND
1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
Bromodichloromethane            ND
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
Toluene                        0.04
Octane                          1.5
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
Tetrachloroethene                 ND
Dibromochloromethane            ND
Chlorobenzene                   ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
Ethyl benzene                   0.34
Total xylenes                    0.43
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.27
                         ND
                         1.8
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.15
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                       0.092
                         ND
                        0.34
                         ND
                         J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                       0.067
                        0.44
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         J
                         ND
                       0.033
                       0.024
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.061
                         ND
                         0.9
                          J
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.68
                         ND
                        0.27
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.048
                        0.37
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                          J
                          J
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                                              221
-------
Project    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
PQL - Practical Quantttation Limit
N/D-Not Detected
N/A-Not Applicable
J-Detected At Less Than The  PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoforrn
Decano
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-D!chlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroothane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
1B06/16EVOOO
1438
VOST
11/6/91
12/12/91
Total ug


3.5
ND
7.8
ND
ND
ND
%
283
54
177
1B061145EVOOO
1439
VOST
11/6/91
12/12/91
Total ug


0.31 .
ND
0.19
ND
J
ND
' %
100
105
99
1B061220EVOOO
1440
VOST
11/6/91
12/12/91
Total ug


0.3
ND
0.17
ND
0.022
ND
%
82
111
89





PQL
Total ug

0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02




                                      Laboratory Manager
                                              222  .
-------
 Project:   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D-Not Detected
                      N/A- Not Applicable
                      J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type

 Collection Date
 Analysis Date
 Concentration
1B071200EVOOO
      1476
     VOST

     11/7/91
    12/12/91
    Total ug
1B071117AVOOO
      1465
     VOST

     11/7/91
    12/12/91
    Total ug
}6Q7{036EVOOO

      1474
     VOST

     11/7/91
    12/12/91
    Total ug
                                                                                         PQL
                                                                                       Total ug
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
 Chloromethane                  ND
 Vinyl chloride                    ND
 Bromomethane                  70
 Chloroethane                    ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane            0.69
 1,1-Dichloroethene               ND
 Acetone                        ND
 Methylene chloride               0.18
 Trans-1,2-dichtoroethene          ND
 1,1-Dichloroethane               ND
 Chloroform                       J
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             0.023
 Carbon tetrachloride              ND
 Benzene                        0.56
 1,2-Dichloroethane               ND
 Trichloroethene    .              ND
 1,2-Dichloropropane              ND
 Bromodichloromethane            ND
 2-ehloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
 Toluene                        0.15
 Octane                         0.61
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
 1,H,2-Trichloroethane              ND
 Tetrachloroethene         .        ND
 Dibromochloromathane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                   J
 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                   0.021
Total xylenes                    0.13
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         1.4
                         ND
                         4.6
                        0.05
                         ND
                        0.71
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                        0.98
                          J
                        0.26
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.093
                        0.44
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        ND
                         J
                        ND
                         J
                        0.058
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.98
                         ND
                         3.1
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.13
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         J
                        0.38
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.066
                        0.47
                        ND
                        ND
                         J
                        ND
                         J
                        ND
                         J
                        0.032
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                                              223
-------
Project: ,  Bofors-Nobal
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                           PQL - Practical Quanttation Limit
                           N/D- Not Detected
                           N/A- Not Applicable
                           J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
      1B071200EVOOO
           1476
           VOST

          11/7/91
          12/13/91
          Total ug
1B071117AVOOO
     1465
     VOST

     11/7/91
    12/12/91
    Total ug
WgEVQOO

      1474
     VOST

     11/7/91
    12/12/91
    Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target Analytas
Nonano
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-DichIofobenzene
1 ,4-DichIorobenzene
1 ,2-DichIorobenzene
0.38
ND
0.19
ND
J
ND
0.34
ND
0.19
ND
0.023
ND
0.3
ND
0.16
ND
ND
ND
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dlchloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
38
114
112
122
118
99
115 |
101
86
Date/"9r"&f     Laboratory Manaoar
                                                                          Date
                                            224
-------
  Project:   Bofors-Nobel
  EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
  Ely Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
PQL - Practical Quantrtation Limit
N/D - Not Detected
N/A-Not Applicable
J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

1A291345AVOOO
1253
VOST
10/29/91
11/26/91
Total ug

1A291224EVOOO
1254
VOST
10/29/91
12/4/91
Total ug

1A291345EVOOO
1256
VOST
10/29/91
12/4/91
Total ug






PQL
Total ug
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodtfluoromethane           ND
 Chloromethane                   ND
 Vinyl chloride                     ND
 Bromomethane                   ND
 Chloroethane                     ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane              1
 1,1-Dichloroethene               - J
 Acetone                         ND
 Methylene chloride                ND
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
 1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
 Chloroform                        j
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane             0.052
 Carbon tetrachloride               ND
 Benzene                        0.24
 1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
 Trichloroethene                  0.031
 1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
 Bromodichloromethane             ND
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether             ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene             ND
 Toluene                         0.082
 Octane                         3.5
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene         ND
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane             ND
 Tetrachloroethene                ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                   ND
 1,H,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                     J
Total xylenes                    0.039
   ND
   ND
   ND
.   58
   ND
  0.64
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
  0.087
   ND
   ND
  0.16
   ND
  0.04
   ND
   ND
   ND
   ND
 0.076
  2.9
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
   J
  ND
  0.24
  0.9
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
 0.033
  ND
  ND
 0.063
  ND
  ND
   J
   J
   J
 0.097
  ND
 0.032
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
 0.037
  3.2
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  J
  ND
. J
0.046
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
                                              225
-------
Project   Bofore-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
N/D-Not Detected
N/A-Not Applicable
J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date •
Concentration

Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoforrn
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichiorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichkiroathane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
1A291345AVOOO
1253
VOST
11/7/91
12/11/91
Total ug


0.33
ND
0.2
ND
ND
ND
%,
82
114
106
1A291224EVOOO
1254
VOST
10/29/91
12/4/91
Total ug


0.34
ND
0.19
ND
ND
ND
%
121
109
98
1A291345EVOOO
1256
VOST
10/29/91
12/4/91
Total ug


0.35
ND
0.2
ND
ND
ND
%
120
111
102





PQL
Total ug

0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02

,


                    Dato/~7"7JC      Laboratory Manager
                             Date
                                               226
-------
 Project:    Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D- Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J- Detected At Less Than The  PQL
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type

 Collection Date
 Analysis Date
 Concentration
1A311057EVOOO
      1323
     VOST

    10/31/91
    12/5/91
    Total ug
1A311130AVOOO    1A311053AVOOO
      1321                1320
     VOST              VOST
    10/31/91
     12/4/91
    Total ug
10/31/91
12/3/91
Total ug
                                                                                         PQL
                                                                                       Total ug
 Target Anafytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane            ND
 Chloromethane                   ND
 Vinyl chloride                     ND
 Bromomethane                   4.1
 Chloroethane                     ND
 Trichlorofluoromethane           0.099
 1,1-Dichloroethene                ND
 Acetone                         ND
 Methylene chloride                ND
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
 1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
 Chloroform                       J
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane              0.28  '
 Carbon tetrachloride               ND
 Benzene                        0.19
 1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
 Trichloroethene                   J
 1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
 Bromodichloromethane             ND
 2-chIoroethyl vinyl ether             ND
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene             ND
 Toluene                        0.073
 Octane                         0.51
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
 1.1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
 Tetrachloroethene                 ND
 Dibromochloromethane            ND
 Chlorobenzene                    J
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
 Ethyl benzene                   0.23
Total xylenes                    0.93
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         13
                         ND
                          1
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         J
                         0.4
                         J
                        0.036
                         ND
                         J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.096
                        0.43
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         J
                         ND
                         J
                        0.028
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         25
                         ND
                         0.64
                         0.05
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         0.12
                         ND
                         0.06
                         ND
                        0.047
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.69
                         ND
                         ND
                        0.14
                         ND
                        0.023
                         ND
                         0.2
                        0.77
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                     0.02
                                              227
-------
Project   Bofore-Nobel
EPA Mathod 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                     PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                     N/D - Not Detected
                     N/A« Not Applicable
                     J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A311057EVOOO
      1323
     VOST

    10/31/91
     12/5/91
    Total ug
      1A311130AVOOO   1A311053AVOOO
           1321              1320
          VOST             VOST
          10/31/91
          12/4/91
          Total ug
10/31/91
 12/3/91
Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoforrn
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlcrobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobanzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.35
ND
0.19
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
0.16
ND
ND
ND
0.3
ND
0.17
ND
J
ND
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
      101
      106
       98
            23
            103
            90
   28
  106
   97
                   Date
Laboratory Manager
                                   &t^'
                                                                          Date
                                             228
-------
Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D-Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A291315AVOOO
      1252
     VOST

    10/29/91
     12/3/91
    Total ug
1A291315EVOOO
      1255
     VOST

    10/29/91
    12/5/91
    Total ug
1A291224AVOOO
      1251
     VOST

    10/29/91
     12/5/91
    Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND.
Chloromethane                   ND
Vinyl chloride                     ND
Bromomethane                  0.25
Chloroethane                     ND
Trichlorofluoromethane            ND
1,1-Dichloroethene                ND
Acetone                         ND
Methylene chloride                ND
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
1,1-DichIoroethane                ND
Chloroform                        J
1,1,1-Trichloroethane               J
Carbon tetrachloride                J
Benzene                          J
1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
Trichloroethene                  0.044
1,2-Dichloropropane               ND
Bromodichloromethane            ND
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
Toluene                        0.14
Octane                         0.49
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
1,1,2-TrichIoroethane              ND
Tetrachloroethene                 ND
Dibromochloromethane            ND
Chlorobenzene                    J
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
Ethyl benzene                     J
Total xylenes                    0.027
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         2.5
                         ND
                         0.15
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                        0.048
                          J
                         0.52
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.32
                         0.42
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                        0.023
                         ND
                        0.032
                         0.14
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.48
                         ND
                        0.024
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                          J
                        0.025
                         ND
                         0.34
                         ND
                          J
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.17
                         0.48
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         0.23
                         0.88
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                                              229
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D- Not Detected
                      N/A- Not Applicable
                      J~ Detected At Lass Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A291315AVOOO
      1252
     VOST

    10/29/91
     12/3/91
    Total ug
1A291315EVOOO
     1255
     VOST

    10/29/91
     12/5/91
    Total ug
1A291224AVOOO
     1251
     VOST

    10/29/91
     12/5/91
    Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target Anorytes
Nonane
Bromcforrn
Decane
1 ,3-DIchlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.3
ND
0.18
ND
ND
ND
0.34
ND
0.19
ND
ND
ND
0.33
ND
0.19
ND
ND
ND
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds
1,2-DichIoroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
87
101
82
73
108
92
78
113
96 :
            Laboratory Manager
                                                      /%    &4~* —
                                                          V
                              Date
                                             230
-------
Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
PQL - Practical Quanttation Limit
N/D- Not Detected
N/A- Not Applicable
J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration

Target Analytes
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Brornomathane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1 ,1-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Methylene chloride
Trans-1 ,2-dfchloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
Cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene
Toluene
Octane
Trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene
1,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
1A311155AVOOO
1322
VOST
10/31/91
12/5/91
Total ug


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.13
ND
ND
0.05
ND
ND
J
0.21
J
0.32
ND
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.13
0.51
ND
ND
. 0.023
ND
0.027
ND
ND
0.037
1A311120EVOOO
1325
VOST
10/31/91
12/5/91
Total ug


ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
1.1
J
0.096
ND
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.037
2.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
ND
J
J
1B071038AVOOO
1464
VOST
11/7/91
12/16/91
Total ug


ND
ND '
ND
ND
ND
1.2
J
ND
0.75
ND
ND
ND
3.2
ND
0.11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.043
1.3
ND
ND
ND
ND
J
ND
0.03
0.27





PQL
Total ug

0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
.0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
                                             231
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                            PC1L - Practical Quantitatfon Umit
                            N/D - Not Detected
                            N/A- Not Applicable
                            J- Detected At Less Than The POL
Sample 1C) Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
      1A311155AVOOO
            1322
           VOST

          10/31/91
          12/5/91
          Total ug
1A311120EVOOO
     1325
     VOST

    10/31/91
     12/5/91
    Total ug
1B071038AVOOO
      1464
     VOST

     11/7/91
    12/16/91
    Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromofonn
Decane
1 ,3-DichIorobenzene
1 ,4-D!chlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dtehlorobenzena
0.35
ND
0.21
ND
ND
ND
0.33
ND
0.21
ND
ND
ND
0.55
ND
0.4
ND
0.027
ND
0:02
0.02
0:02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobanzene
127
109
101
93
99
87
107
86
104 ;
Date  --
                                     Laboratory Manager fy
                               Date/
                                             232
-------
Project:    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                      PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                      N/D- Not Detected
                      N/A-Not Applicable
                      J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
                      B • VOST Tubes received broken
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1B071115EVOOO
      1475
     VOST

     11/7/91
    12/16/91
    Total ug
1A241225EVOOO
      1194
     VOST

    10/24/91
     11/6/91
    Total ug
1A281000QVOOT
      1220
     VOST

    10/28/91

    Total ug
  PQL
Total ug
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethane           ND
Chloromethane                   ND
Vinyl chloride                     ND
Bromomethane                   0.52
Chloroethane                     ND
Trichlorofluoromathane            0.32
1,'l-Dichloroethene                ND
Acetone                         ND
Methylene chloride               0.023
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene           ND
1,1-Dichloroethane                ND
Chloroform                        J
1,1,1-Trichloroethane               J
Carbon tetrachloride               ND
Benzene                        0.17
1,2-Dichloroethane                ND
Trichloroethene                    J
1,2-Diehloropropane               ND
Bromodichloromethane            ND
2-ehloroethyl vinyl ether            ND
Cis-1,3-dichloropropene            ND
Toluene                        0.028
Octane                          0.39
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene          ND
1,'1,2-Trichloroethane              ND
Tetrachloroethene           .      ND
Dibromochloromethane            ND
Chlorobenzene                  0.034
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane          ND
Ethyl benzene           •          J
Total xylenes                      J
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                         0.03
                          ND
                          ND
                          J
                          J
                          ND
                         0.86
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                         0.17
                          1.1
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
                         0.029
                          ND
                          0.2
                         0.82
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                          B
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                         0.02
                                               233
-------
 Project   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                     PQL • Practical Quantitation Limit
                     N/D- Not Detected
                     N/A-Not Applicable
                     B °* VOST Tubes received broken
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1B071115EVOOO
     1475
     VOST

    11/7/91
    12/16/91
    Total ug
1A241225EVOOO   1A281000QVOOT
     1194               1220
     VOST             VOST
    10/24/91
    11/5/91
    Total ug
10/28/91

Total ug
                                                                                     PQL
Target Anatytas
Nonane
Bromofomi
Decana
1 ,3-DIchlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlor obsnzana
1,2-Dichlorobenzena
0.26
ND
0.11
ND
ND
ND
0.31 .
ND
0.24
ND
ND
ND
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.02
0,02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0:02
Surrogate compounds
1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluoro benzene
112
98
72
100
98
107
B
B
B
                  Date /-<7>-9j?     Laboratory Manager
                                                                         Date/,
                                            234
-------
 Project:   Bofors-Nobal
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                 PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                 N/D- Not Detected
                 N/A-Not Applicable
                 J-Detected At Less Than The  PQL
                 B - VOST Tubes received broken
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A291205EVOOF
1257
VOST
10/29/91
Total ug
1A311130EVOOO
1324
VOST
10/31/91
Total ug
1B071045EVOOF
1477
VOST
10/28/91
Total ug

PQL
Total ug
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane
 Chloromethane
 Vinyl chloride
 Bromomethane
 Chloroethane
 Trichlorofluoromethane
 1,1-Dichloroethane
 Acetone
 Methylene chloride
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene
 1,1-Dichloroethane
 Chloroform
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
 Carbon tetrachloride
 Benzene
 1,2-Dichloroethane
 Trichloroethene
 1,2-Dichloropropane
 Bromodichloromethane
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene
Toluene
 Octane
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tatrachlbroethene
 Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
 Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
 B
B
B
B
B
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
                                                 235
-------
Project " Bofors-Nobel
                                              PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data                   N/D - Not Detected
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD                N/A - Not Applicable
                                              B • VOST Tubas received broken
Sample ID Number         1A291205EVOOF   1A311130EVOOO    1B071045EVOOF
Master Index Number            1257               1324              1477
Sample Type                   VOST             VOST             VOST

Collection Date                10/29/91            10/31/91            10/28/91
Analysis Date
Concentration                  Total ug            Total ug            Total ug              PQL


Target Anar/tas
Nonane
Bromoform
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dfchtorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
' B
B
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds             %                 %                 %

1,2-D!chloroethaned-4            B                 B                 B
Toluene d-8                     B                 B                 B
Bromofluorobenzene              B                 B                 B
                   Date  -l'         Laboratory Manager /Ovto^       Date
                                             236
-------
Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                       PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                       WD- Not Detected
                       N/A- Not Applicable
                       J • Detected At Less Than The PQL
                       B • VOST Tubes received broken
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
1B071045EVOOS
      1478
     VOST
1B051215EVOOO
      1394
     VOST
1B061115AVOOO
      1428
     VOST
Collection Date
Analysis Date ,
Concentration
10/29/91
Total ug
10/31/91
Total ug
10/28/91
Total ug
PQL
Total ug
Target Analytes

Dichlorodifluoromethano
Chloromethane
Vinyl chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Methylene chloride     ,
Trans-1,2-dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
Cis-1,3-dichIoropropene
Toluene
Octane
Trans-1,3-dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Totrachloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
1.1,2,2-TetrachIoroethane
Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
      -B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
                                               237
-------
Project   Bofore-Nobel
                                              PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data                   N/D - Not Detected
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD                N/A - Not Applicable.
                                              B - VOST Tubes received broken
Sample ID Number         1B07104SEVOOS   1B051215EVOOO   1B061115AVOOO
Master Index Number            1478               1394              1428
Sample Type                   VOST             VOST             VOST                '

Collection Date                10/29/91            10/31/91           10/28/91
Analysis Date
Concentration                  Total ug            Total ug           Total ug             PQL


Target Analytes                                                                          '
Nonane
Bromoforrn
Decane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzena
B
• B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds             %                 %                 %

1,2-Dichloroothanad-4            B                 B                 B
Toluene d-8                     B                 B                 B
Bromofiuorobenzene              B                 B                 B
                   Data     '         Laboratory Manager     A.->^        Date
                                             238
-------
 Project   Bofors-Nobel
 EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
 Ely Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                       PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                       N/D - Not Detected
                       N/A-Not Applicable
                       J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
                       B-VOST Tubes received broken
 Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
 Sample Type

 Collection Date
 Analysis Date
 Concentration
1A241335EVOOO
      1196
     VOST

    10/24/91

    Total ug
                                                                                             PQL
                                                                                           Total ug
 Target Analytes

 Dichlorodifluoromethane
 Chloromethane
 Vinyl chloride
 Bromomethane
 Chloroethane
 Trichlorofluoromethane
 1,1-Dichloroethene
 Acetone
 Methylene chloride
 Trans-1,2-dichloroethene
 1,1-Dichloroethane
 Chloroform
 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
 Carbon tetrachloride
 Benzene
 1,2-Dichloroethane
 Trichloroethene
 1,2-Dichloropropane
 Bromodichloromethane
 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether
 Cis-1,3-dichloropropene
 Toluene
 Octane
 Trans-1,3-dichloropropene
 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
 Totrachloroethene
 Dibromochloromethane
 Chlorobenzene
 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
 Ethyl benzene
Total xylenes
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
       B
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
 0.02
0.02
0.02 .
0.02
0.02
                                                239
-------
Project:   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewtett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A241335EVOOO
      1196
     VOST

    10/24/91

    Total ug
   PQL
Total ug
Target Analytes
Nonane
Bromoform
Decano
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
B
B
B '
B
B
B
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
       B
       B
       B
                                      Laboratory Manager
                                                  Date
                                             240
-------
TABLE 2.  QA/QC RESULTS
          241
-------
Project    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                            MS-Matrix Spike
                            MSO - Matrix Spike Duplicate
                            PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                            N/D - Not Detected
                            N/A-Not Applicable
                            J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
      1B071750BGOOO
            1514
           Water
          MS/MSD

           11/7/91
          11/12/91
1B051355TGOOO   1B010835FGOOO
      1508               1360
      Ash              Sludge
   MS /MSD         MS /MSD*
    11/7/91
    11/12/91
  11/1/91
 11/14/91
Target Analytes
1,1-Dichloroethene
Benzene
Trichloroothane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
60/45
97/112
104/119
89/91
100/112
15/15
60/120
65/69
102/114
99/102
20
128
127
76 !
122
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene cl-8
Bromofluorobenzene
          116/66
           94/83
          98/110
    111/126
    111/108
    100/101
   63
   100
   112

* MSD Not Analyzed
Date
                                     Laboratory Manager.
          ^AxfcAfe,
                                                            /^
                                            242
-------
Project:    Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                MS - Matrix Spike
                MSD - Matrix Spike Duplicate
                PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                N/D - Not Detected
                N/A- Not Applicable
                J- Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Sample Type

Collection Date
Analysis Date
Concentration
1A241220EVOOO
1198
VOST
MS
10/24/91
11/6/91
Total ng
1A291205EVOOS
1258
VOST
MS
10/29/91
11/27/91
Total ng
1A311132EVOOS
1327
VOST
MS
10/31/91
11/27/91
Total ng
Target Anaiytes
1,1-Dichloroethone
Benzene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Octane
Nonane
Decane
163
343
226
283
264
328
261
163
140
993
289
289
338
708
513
296
47
•501
163
269
144
281
190
96
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
71
133
118
130
119
126
71
63
45
                                      Laboratory Manager
                                             Date
                                               243
-------
Project   Bofors-Nobel
EPA Method 8240 Analysis Data
By Hewlett Packard 5890/5971 MSD
                MS - Matrix Spike
                MSD - Matrix Spike Duplicate
                POL - Practical Quantitation Limit
                N/D - Not Detected
                N/A« Not Applicable
                J-Detected At Less Than The PQL
Sample ID Number
Master Indsx Number
Sample Type

Collection Data
Analysis Date
Concentration
1B061120EVOOS
1442
VOST
MS
11/6/91
12/9/91
Total ng
1B051115EVOOS !
1396
VOST
. MS
11/5/91
12/9/91
Total- ng
Target Analytes
1,1-Dichloroethene
Benzene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenxene
Octane
Nonane
Decane
190
735
211
398
308
465
368
214
254
350*
104
504 i
323
340
438
247
Surrogate compounds

1,2-Dichloroethane d-4
Toluene d-8
Bromofluorobenzene
39
78
77
79
120
116
                   Date/•?-£?      Laboratory Manager.
                                            Date
                                              244
-------
       ~  APPENDIX C-3




SEIVHVOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSES
             245
-------
To:                 Charly King, Bofors-Nobel Test Engineer

From:               Dennis Tabor, Lab Manager^

Date:               January 13,  1991

Subject:             Method 8270 Analyses of Bofors-Nobel Samples
       The following exceptions  to the QAPjP were made  during the Bofors-Nobel 8270
analyses.                                                               •   i          .

•      The Principal Organic Hazardous Constituents (POHCs) were quantitated using a five
       level initial calibration curve.  The Target Compound List (TCL) constituents were
       quantitated using a single point calibration.

•      Method 8270 states that the response factors for all analytes must initially be linear over
       five levels.  Linearity is defined as having Relative Standard Deviation (% RSD) values
       of less than thirty. Three five level calibrations were used to quantitate the POHCs over
       the course of the project.  The %  RSD's for all POHC  analytes were less than  30,
       excluding benzidine, which had % RSD values of 30.7 and 31.7 in the first two of the
       five level calibrations.  The third five level calibration was linear for all POHC analytes,
       including benzidine, which had a % RSD value of 17.2.                 ;

       The variations in benzidines % RSD values are due, in part, to the poor chromatographic
       behavior  of  benzidine.  The  only  correction that we might have used would have
       increased the PQL, therefore, we accepted the slightly higher RSD's.

•      Daily checks were performed to verify that the initial five point calibration response
       factors  were still valid.  The relative percent difference (RPD) of the daily must be
       +/- 30 from that of the initial five point. The RPD for benzidine was greater than 30
       for samples analyzed on November 25, November 26, December 2,  and December 9.
       On those days, a second daily calibration check was  performed  after analysis of the
       test samples to verify that the response  factors for  benzidine was not appreciably
       different from  the initial daily calibration check.                       ;


In addition, the following clarifications of the QAPjP are noted.

•      Practical  Quantitation Limits (PQL) were calculated  using the low point (20 ng/ml
       injected) on the calibration curve for the POHC. The  PQL's for the TCL constituents
       were calculated using one half (10 /*g/ml injected) their single point calibration.

•      Sludge feed  matrix spike level was 300 mg/kg (6 times PQL).
       Kiln ash matrix spike level was  18.0 mg/kg (9 times PQL).
       Scrubber liquor matrix spike level was 180 /xg/L (9 times PQL).
       Flue gas matrix spike level was 60.0 /tg/XAD-2 trap (3 times PQL).
                                        246
-------
•     Sample 1B061057ESOMO was lost during extraction.

•     The flue gas  train  duplicate  was  a  second  analysis  of the extract  of sample
      1B071010ESOMO.

•     Daily solvent blanks were  run as part of standard laboratory quality control but not
      reported, unless needed to interpret data.
                                         247
-------
                                                                                         Page 1 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                            Project:

                                    Report Number:
                                           Revision:
                 Bpfors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                  ;     BOF-4
                  I           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A211530FGOMO  1A231100FGOMO 1A280900FGOMO  1A281030FGOMO
      1215              1272             1293             < 1294
        3                3                 3                3
      Collection Date              10-21-91
      Extraction Date              10-24-92
        Analysis Date              11-13-91
Analyte / Concentration             (mg/kg)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                            ND
 Azobenzene                       5590
 Benzidine                        < PQL
 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine              4820

Target Compound List Analytes
 Phenol                             ND
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-DichIorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether           ND
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane                   ND
 Nitrobenzene               ,        ND
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol                  ND
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene             < PQL
 Naphthalene                        ND
 4-Chloroan»line                     ND
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                ND
 Hexachlorocvclooentadiene           ND
                      10-23-91
                      10-29-91
                      11-13-91
                      (mg/kg)
                        ND
                        5890
                       
-------
                                                                                          Page 2 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                             Project:

                                    Report Number:
                                            Revision:
                Bofors/Nobel
              Superfund Site
                      BOF-4
                            0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A211S30FGOMO  1A231100FGOMO  1A280900FGOMO  1A281030FGOMO
      1215              1272              1293              1294
        3                 33                 3
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,<5-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2-Chloronaphthalene                ND
 2-Nitroaniline                       ND
 Dimethylphthalate                  ND
 Acenaphthylene                     ND
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene                  ND
 3-Nitroaniline                       ND
 Acenaphthene                      ND
 2,4-Dinitrophenol                   ND
 Dibenzofuran                       ND
 4-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene             •    ND
 Diethylphthalate                    ND
 Fluorene                           ND
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether   '        ND
 4-Nitroaniline                       ND
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol           ND
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine     •        ND
 4-Bromophenylphenylether           ND
 Hexachlorobenzene                  ND
 Pentachlorophenol                  ND
 Phenanthrene                       ND
 Anthracene                         ND
 Di-ii-butylphthalate               .   ND
 Fluoranthene                       ND
 Pyrene                             ND
 Butylbenzylphthalate                ND
 Benzo(a)anthracene                 ND
 Chrysene                           ND
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate            ND
 Di-n-octylphthalate                  ND
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene                ND
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene           ;     ND
 Benzo(a)pyrene	ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                 '  ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
                                                                                   ND
ND - Not Detected Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
       Analyst
            ••••.
Lab Supervisor
                                     .A

Date

Date
                                                       )  / -;S~/
                                              249
-------
                                                                                      Page 3 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270 .
                                           Project:


                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:
              Bofors/Nobel
             Superfund Site
                '     BOF-4
                          0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A211530FGOMO 1A231100FGOMO 1A280900FGOMO  1A28103OFGOMO
      1215             1272             1293              1294
       3                3-                3                3
Target Compound List Analytes
 Indeno(lA3-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(a1h)anthracene               ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                     Dil
 Phenol d-6                         Dil
 Nitrobenzene d-5                   Dil
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                   Dil
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol               Dil
 4-Terphenvl d-14                   Dil
                       ND
                       ND
                       ND
                        Dil
                        Dil
                        Dil
                        Dil
                        Dil
                        Dil
ND
ND
ND
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
ND
ND
ND
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
ND - Not Detected  Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD,
                                         Date

                                         Date
                                                                                 ' /
                                                                                  )  I
                                              250
-------
                                                                                          Page 4 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                             Project:

                                    Report Number:
                                           Revision:
                 Bofors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                       BOF-4
                             0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1B010830FGOMO  1B010830FGOMD  1B01083SFGOMO
      1351              1398'              1352
        8                8                 8
      Collection Date              11-01-91
      Extraction Date              11-04-91
        Analysis Date              11-15-91
Analyte / Concentration             (mg/kg)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                             ND
 Azobenzene                      < PQL
 Benzidine                        < PQL
 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine  .            740

Target Compound List Analytes
 Phenol                          '   ND
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether        •  ND  '
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane.                   ND
 Nitrobenzene                       ND
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol                  ND
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                        ND
 4-Chloroaniline                     ND
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                ND
 Hexachlorocvclopentadiene           ND
                      11-01-91
                      11-05-91
                      11-15-91
                      (mg/kg)
                        ND
                       
-------
                                                                                         PageS of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                            Project:


                                   Report Number:
                                           Revision:
               Bpfors/Nobel
             Superfund Site
                     BOF-4
                           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1B010830FGOMO  1B010830FGOMD 1B010835FGOMO
      1351           ;   1398              1352
       8                8                 8
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2-ChloronaphthaIene                ND
 2-Nitroaniline                       ND
 Dimethylphthalate                   ND
 Acenaphthylene         "           ND
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene                   ND
 3-Nitroaniline                       ND
 Acenaphthene                      ND
 2,4-Dinitrophenol ^                  ND
 Dibenzofuran    "                  ND
 4-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene                   ND
 Diethylphthalate                    ND
 Fluorene                           ND
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether          ' ND
 4-Nitroaniline                       ND
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol '          ND
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine              ND
 4-Bromophenylphenylether           ND
 Hexachlorobenzene                  ND
 Pentachlorophenol                   ND
 Phenanthrene                       ND
 Anthracene                        ND
 Di-n-butylphthalate                  ND
 Fluoranthene                       ND
 Pyrene                             ND
 Butylbenzylphthalate                ND
 Benzo(a)anthracene                 ND
 Chrysene                           ND
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate            ND
 Di-n-octylphthalate                  ND
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene               ND
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene       .       ND
 "Renyofa^nvrene                     ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND - Not Detected  Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate  '
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC/ 5970B MSD
              Analyst

       Lab Supervisor.
Date

Date
                                                          I I
                                               252
-------
                                                                                      Page 6 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                           Project:

                                  Report Number:
                                         Revision:
                                                    Bofors/Nobel
                                                   Superfund Site
                                                           BOF-4
                                                                0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
     Lagoon Number
1B010830FGOMO  1B010830FGOMD 1B010835FGOMO
      1351              1398              1352
       888
Target Compound List Analytes
 Ihdeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene               ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                 ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                     Dil
 Phenol d-6                         Dil
 Nitrobenzene d-5                    Dil
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                    Dil
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol                Dil
 4-Terphenyl d-14                    Dil
                       ND
                       ND
                       ND
                       Dil
                       Dil
                       Dil
                       Dil
                       Dil
                       Dil
                                      ND
                                      ND
                                      ND
                                      Dil
                                      Dil
                                      Dil
                                      Dil
                                      Dil
                                      Dil
ND - Not Detected  Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
             Analyst
                   —*•
       Lab Supervisor _.
                     U    s
       .1   ,—.	  AU
y^ >n     \^J^r^
                                        Date

                                        Date
                                            253
-------
                                                                                          Page 7 of 41
 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
 By EPA Method 8270
                                                                   Project:

                                                           Report Number:
                                                                  Revision:
                 Bbfors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                       BOF-4
                             0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                       1A241500TGOMO 1A29153OTGOMO 1A311315TGOMO  LA311315TGOMD
                             1269              1292              1354              1399
                              3                 3                 3                3
       Collection Date              10-24-91
       Extraction Date              10-29-91
        Analysis Date              11-25-91
Analyte / Concentration             (mg/kg)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                  '          ND
 Azobenzene                        ND
 Benzidine                          ND
 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine               ND

Target Compound List Analytes
' Phenol                             ND
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether           ND
, N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane                   ND
 Nitrobenzene         -             ND
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol                  ND
 1,2,4-TrichIorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                        ND
 4-Chloroaniline                     ND
 Hexnchlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                ND
 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene           ND
                                             10-29-91
                                             10-30-91
                                             11-25-91
                                             (mg/kg)
                                               ND
                                             
-------
                                                                                       Page Sot 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy,Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                         Project:

                                                                Report Number:
                                                                       Revision:
                                                                              Bofors/Nobel
                                                                            Superfund Site
                                                                                    BOF-4
                                                                                          0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
     Lagoon Number
                      1A241500TGOMO
                            1269
                             3
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
 2-Ghloronaphthalene
 2-Nitroaniline
 Dimethylphthalate
 Acenaphthylene
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
 3-Mitroaniline
 Acenaphthene
 2,4-Dinitrophenol
 Dibenzofuran
 4-Nitrophenol
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
 Diethylphthalate
 Fluorene
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether
 4-Nitroaniline
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
 N.-Nitrosodiphenylamine
 4-Bromophenylphenylether
 Hexachlorobenzene
 Pentachlorophenol
 Phenanthrene
 Anthracene
 Di-n-butylphthalate
 Fluoranthene
 Pyrene
 Butylbenzylphthalate
 Benzo(a)anthracene
 Chrysene
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 Di-n-octylphthalate
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                  < PQL
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                  < PQL
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   2.53
                                  < PQL
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                              1A291530TGOMO
                                                    1292
                                                      3
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                            * ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                            .
s\-
                                                                     Date
                                                                      Date
                                                                                  /
                                              255
-------
                                                                                       Page 9 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                            Project:

                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:
               Bofors/Nobel
              Superfund Site
                !      BOF-4
                           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A241500TGOMO 1A291530TGOMO  1A311315TGOMO 1A311315TGOMD
      1269              1292              1354             1399
       3                 3                3             ;   3
Target Compound List Analytes
 Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene              ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                     88.3
 Phenol d-6                         90.4
 Nitrobenzene d-5                   83.6
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                   93.2
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol       '        47.9
 4-Terphenyl d-14                   134
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        76.0
                        92.5
                        86.0
                        99.7
                        91.2
                        84.1
 ND
 ND
 ND
 108
 101
 100
 109
 106
 142
ND
ND
ND
95.5
93.7
92.6
97.6
106
99.9
ND - Not Detected  Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
             Analyst

       Lab Supervisor
Date

Date
                                                     \  I 1
                                             256
-------
                                                                                          Page 10 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                             Project:

                                    Report Number:
                                            Revision:
                                                                                 Bofors/Nobel
                                                                               Superfund Site
                                                                                       BOF-4
                                                                                             0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1B051355TGOMO
      1446
       8
       Collection Date              11-05-91
       Extraction Date              11-06-91
        Analysis Date              11-27-91
Analyte / Concentration             (mg/kg)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                             ND
 Azobenzene                        ND
 Benzidine                          ND
 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine               ND

Target Compound List Analytes
 Phenol                             ND
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether           ND
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane                   ND
 Nitrobenzene                       ND
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol            .      ND
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                        ND
 4-Chloroaniline                     ND
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                ND
 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene	ND
                                         1BO61355TGOMO
                                               1544
                                                 8

                                              11-06-91
                                              11-13-91
                                              12-04-91
                                              (mg/kg)
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                   1B071320TGOMO
                          1547
                           8

                        11-07-91
                        11-13-91
                        12-05-91
                        (mg/kg)
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
                                                                  ND
ND - Not Detected Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
       Analyst

Lab Supervisor
                                                            :x
\ cu-sircy?
                                          Date

                                          Date
                                                                                      /  / 757
                                                257
-------
                                                                                       ;Pagellof41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                          Project:

                                                                 Report Number:
                                                                        Revision:
                                                                               Bofors/Nobel
                                                                             Superfund Site
                                                                                :     EIOF-4
                                                                                           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
     Lagoon Number
                             1BOS13S5TGOMO 1B061355TGOMO  1B071320TGOMO
                                    1446              1544              1547
                                     88                8
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
 2-Chloronaphthalene
 2-Nitroaniline
 Dimethylphthalate
 Acenaphthylene
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
 3-Nitroaniline
 Acenaphthene
 2,4-DinitrophenoI
 Dibenzofuran    •     '   .
 4-Nitrophe'nol
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
 Diethylphthalate
 Fluorene
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether
 4-Nitroaniline
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol   .
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
 4-Bromophenylphenylether
 Hexachlorobenzene
 Pentachlorophenol
 Phenanthrene
 Anthracene         .
 Di-n-butylphthalate
 Fluoranthene
 Pyrene
 Butylbenzylphthalate
 Benzo(a)anthracene
 Chrysene
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 Di-n-octylphthalate
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND .
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                  < PQL
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                  < PQL
                                  < PQL
                                    ND
                                    ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                             
-------
                                                                                        Page 12 of 41
 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
 By EPA Method 8270
                                                                  Project:


                                                          Report Number:
                                                                 Revision:
               Bofors/Nobel
              Superfund Site
                      BOF-4
                           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                      1B051355TGOMO  1B061355TGOMO 1B071320TGOMO
                            1446              1544              1547
                              888
Target Compound List Analytes
 Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene               ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                 ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                      53.9
 Phenol d-6                          24.0
 Nitrobenzene d-5                    84.8
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                    86.1
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol                27.9
 4-Terphenyl d-14	71.5
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              37.0
                                              82.1
                                              90.4
                                              89.9
                                              22.0
                                              119
ND
ND
ND
18.4
78.9
82.6
88.7
12.0
92.8
ND - Not Detected  Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
             Analyst
Lab Supervisor   2^ ~B~v^y^*-£
                                               \- Of-V&~^

                                                               Date
Date
                                             259
-------
                                                                                        Page 13 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                   Project:


                                                          Report Number:
                                                                  Revision:
                 Bofors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                       BOF-4
                             0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                      1A241722BGOMO 1A291753BGOMO  1A311534BGOMO  1B051626BGOMO
                            1338              1539              1494            ;  1495
                              3                 33                 8
      Collection Date              10-24-91
      Extraction Date              10-30-92
     •   Analysis Date              11-25-91
Analyte / Concentration              G*g/L)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                        ,    ND
 Azobenzene                        ND
 Benzidine                          ND
 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine               ND

Target Compound List Analytes
 Phenol                             ND
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether           ND
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane                  ND
 Nitrobenzene                       ND
 Isophorone                        ND
 2-Nitrophenol                      ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol                  ND
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                       ND
 4-Chloroaniline                     ND
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene               . ND
 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene           ND
                                             10-29-91
                                             11-06-91
                                             11-27-91
10-31-91
11-06-91
11-26-91
11-05-91
11-06-91
11-29-91
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
 ND - Not Detected  Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
 Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
       Analyst

Lab Supervisor
                                                                       Date         f 7  I'll 1
                                                                       Date         / 7 /S"/
                                               260
-------
                                                                                         Page 14 of 41
 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
 By EPA Method 8270
                                                                    Project:

                                                           Report Number:
                                                                  Revision:
                 Bofors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                        BOF-4
                             0
    Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                       1A241722BGOMO  1A291753BGOMO 1A311534BGOMO 1BOS1626BGOMO
                             1338              1539             1494              1495
                               3                3                 3.8
Target Compound List Analytes
  2,4,6-Trichlorophenol                ND
  2,4,5-Trichlorophenol                ND
  2-Chloronaphthalene                ND
  2-Nitroaniline                      ND
  Dimethylphthalate                  ND
  Acenaphthylene                     ND
  2,6-Dinitrotoluene                  ND
  3-Nitroaniline                      ND
  Acenaphthene                      ND
  2,4-Dinitrophenol              .     ND
  Dibenzofuran                       ND
  4-NitrophenoI  "                   ND
  2,4-Dinitrotoluene                  ND
  Diethylphthalate                    ND
  Fluorene                           ND
  4-Chlorophenylphenylether-           ND
  4-Nitroaniline                      ND
  4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol           ND
  N-Nitrosodiphenylamine        •     ND
  4-Bromophenylphenylether           ND
  Hexachlorobenzene                  ND
  Pentachlorophenol                  ND
  Phenanthrene                       ND
  Anthracene       '                  ND
  Di-n-burylphthalate                  ND
  Fluoranthene     -                  ND
  Pyrene                             ND
  Butylbenzylphthalate                 ND
  Benzo(a)anthracene                  ND
  Chrysene                           ND
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate          < PQL
 Di-ii-octylphthaiate                  ND
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene                ND
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene                ND
 Benzo(a')pvrene	< PQL
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                             
-------
                                                                                      Page 15 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                           Project:


                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:
                                                        Bofors/Nobel
                                                      Superfund Site
                                                              BOF-4
                                                                   0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A241722BGOMO 1A2917S3BGOMO  1A311S34BGOMO  1B051626BGOMO
     • 1338 -            1539              1494            ;  1495
       3                 3.3                8
Target Compound List Analytes
 Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene             < PQL
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene              ND
 Benzo(g4i4)perylene   ,            < PQL

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                     68.2
 Phenol d-6                         723
 Nitrobenzene d-5                   73.7
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                   73.6
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol               92.6
 4-Terphenvl d-14                   88.7
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        66.6
                        70.5
                        82.2
                        82.0
                        72.1'
                        94.2
                                         ND
                                         ND
                                         ND
                                         87.1
                                         88.9
                                         94.4
                                         77.5
                                         97.6
                                          112
ND
ND
ND
68.8
81.0
78.1
81.6
111
87.6
ND - Not Detected  Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate ;
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
              Analyst

        Lab Supervisor
\fcl
                                         Date

                                         Date
                                             262
-------
                                                                                      Page 16 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                            Project:    Bofors/Nobel
                                                     Superfund Site
                                   Report Number:          BOF-4
                                          Revision:                0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number

      Collection Date
      Extraction Date
        Analysis Date
Analyte / Concentration

POHC Analytes
 Aniline
 Azobenzene
 Benzidine
 SjSVDichlorobenzidine
1B061607BGOMO
      1540
       8

    11-06-91
    11-11-92
    11-29-91
1B061607BGOMD
      1541
        8

     11-06-91
     11-11-92
     12-02-91
1B071740BGOMO 1B071750BGOMO
      1560            .1543
       8                8
    11-07-91
    11-13-92
    12-05-91
11-07-91
11-11-92
12-05-91
      ND
      5590
     
-------
                                                                                     Page 17 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                         Project:

                                                                Report Number:
                                                                       Revision:
                                Bofors/Nobel
                              Superfund Site
                                      BOF-4
                                            0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
     Lagoon Number
                             1B061607BGOMO 1B061607BGOMD  1B071740BGOMO  1B0717SOBGOMO
                                   1540              1541              1560    .          1543
                                    8                 8                8                8
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
 2-Chloronaphthalene
 2-Nitroaniline
 Dimethylphthalate
 Acenaphthylene
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
 3-NitroaniIine
 Acenaphthene
 2,4-Dinitrophenol
 Dibenzofuran
 4-Nitrophenol
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
 Diethylphthalate
 Fluorene
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether
 4-Nitroaniline
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methyIphenol
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
 4-Bromophenylphenylether
 Hexachlorobenzene
 Pentachlorophenol
 Phenanthrene
 Anthracene
 Di-n-butylphthalate
 Fluoranthene
 Pyrene
 Butylbenzylphthalate
 Benzo(a)anthracene
 Chrysene
 Bis(2-ethylhejQ'l)phthalate
 Di-n-octylphthalate
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND-
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND  .
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                  < PQL
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                  < PQL
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND.
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
-------
                                                                                      Page 18 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                  Project:

                                                          Report Number:
                                                                 Revision:
                                      Bofors/Nobel
                                    Superfund Site
                                            BOF-4
                                                  0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                      1B061607BGOMO
                            1540
                              8
Target Compound List Analytes
 Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene               ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                 ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                      9.93
 Phenol d-6                          9.51
 Nitrobenzene d-5                    22.2
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                    25.3
- 2,4,6-Tribromophenol                37.4
 4-Terphenyl d-14	      32.7
1B061607BGOMD
      1541
       8
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              45.5
                                              31.4
                                              86.2
                                              87.0
                                              80.4
                                              98.0
1B071740BGOMO 1B071750BGOMO
      1560             1543
       8                8
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        47.2
                        37.9
                        78.8
                        80.3
                        89.8
                        87.6
                       ND
                       ND
                       ND
                       65.2
                       72.1
                       833
                       85.6
                       89.8
                       90.3
ND - Not Detected Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC/ 5970B MSD
             Analyst
                    VglM
Lab Supervisor  Y^
                       Date

                       Date
                                                                                   /  /  IS' I
                                              265
-------
                                                                                        Page 19 of 41
Gas Chroinatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                               Project:


                                      Report Number:
                                             Revision:
                Bofors/Nobel
              Su'perfimd Site
                ;      BOF-4
                }           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
   1A241146ASOMO 1A291155ASOMO  1A3110OOASOMO  1BOS1045ASOMO
         1218             1267              1347            !  1408
          3                 3                3                 8
      Collection Date              10-24-91
      Extraction Date              10-24-91
        Analysis Date              11-18-91
Analyte / Concentration            (jag/train)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                            ND
 Azobenzene                        ND
 Benzidine                          ND
 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine               ND

Target Compound List Analytes
 Phenol                             25.4
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether           ND
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane                   ND
 Nitrobenzene                     < PQL
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol                  ND
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                        ND ,
 4-Chloroariiline                     ND  .
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                ND
 Hexnchlorocvclooentadiene           ND
                                                    10-29-91
                                                    10-29-91
                                                    11-18-91
                                                   (/£g/train)
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                    
-------
                                                                                       Page 20 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                            Project:

                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:,
                Bofors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                       BOF-4
                            0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A241146ASOMO  1A291155ASOMO  1A311OOOASOMO  1B051O45ASOMO
      1218              1267              1347       .       1408
       3                 3                3                 8
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2,44-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2-Chloronaphthalene                ND
 2-Nitroaniline                      ND
 Dimethylphthalate                  ND
 Acenaphthylene                    ND
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene                  ND
 3-Nitroaniline                      ND
 Acenaphthene                      ND
 2,4-Dinitrophenol                   ND
 Dibenzofuran                      ND
 4-Nitrophenol                      ND
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene                  ND
 Diethylphthalate             '       ND
 Fluorene                          ND
 4-ChlorophenylphenyIether           ND
 4-Nitroaniline                      ND
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol           ND
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine             ND
 4-Bromophenylphenylether           ND
 Hexachlorobenzene                 ND
 Pentachlorophenol                  ND
 Phenanthrene                      ND
 Anthracene                        ND
 Di-n-butylphthalate                < PQL
 Huoranthene                      ND
 Pyrene                            ND
 Butylbenzylphthalate               < PQL
 Benzo(a)anthracene                 ND
 Chrysene                          ND
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate            30.4
 Di-n-octylphthalate                < PQL
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene               ND
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene               ND
 Benzofalpyrene                	ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND .
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                       
                                         Date

                                         Date
                  _/r/l
                                              267
-------
                                                                                     Page 21 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                           Project:

                                  Report Number:
                                          Revision:
  Bofors/Nobel
Superfund Site
   ;     BOF-4
             0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
     Lagoon Number
1A241146ASOMO 1A291155ASOMO  1A311000ASOMO  1B051O45ASOMO
      1218             1267             1347            l 1408
       3                3                3                 8
Target Compound List Analytes
 Indeno(l,23-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene              ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                     843
 Phenol d-6                         88.8
 Nitrobenzene d-5                   100
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                   105
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol  •             903
 4-Terphenyl d-14      .             89.8
 Octafluorobiphenyl                 63.7
 9-Phenvlanthracene	86.4
                                                    ND
                                                    ND
                                                    ND
                                                    68.1
                                                    55.5
                                                    93.2
                                                    90.9
                                                    109
                                                    783
                                                    56.1
                                                    77.6
                                        ND
                                        ND
                                        ND
                                        77.8
                                        53.2
                                         109
                                        52.6
                                         105
                                        82.7
                                        79.0
                                        93.0
     ND
     ND
     ND
     95.8
     67.9
     102
     53.4
     94.1
     70.2
     65.2
     79.1
ND - Not Detected
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC/ 5970B MSD
              Analyst

        Lab Supervisor
                                         Date

                                         Date
                                             268
-------
                                                                                    Page 22 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroseopy
By EPA Method 8270
                                    Project:   Bofors/Nobel
                                             Superfund Site
                            Report Number          BOF-4
                                  Revision:              1
                Sample ID Number 1B061100ASOMO 1B071017ASOMO 1A241146ESOMO 1A291159ESOMO
              Master Index Number      1490           1500            1219           1268  A
                  Lagoon Number       8              8              3              3    -y
                   Collection Date
                   Extraction Date
                    Analysis Date
           Analyte / Concentration
POHC Analytes
  Aniline
  Azobenzene
  Benzidine
  3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
 11-06-91
 11-06-91
 11-27-91
(jig/train)
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
                                                     11-07-91
                                                     11-07-91
                                                     12-02-91
                                                    (/ig/train)
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
 10-24-91
 10-24-91
 11-18-91
(/ig/train)
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
» '•—•  A ^U«, *^M«.^WU^U                             ,
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD

                         Analyst
                              • ••.
                   Lab Supervisor
 10-29-91
 10,29-91
 11-20-91
(ftg/train)
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
Target Compound List Analytes
Phenol
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
4-Methylphenol
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-TrichIorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocvclonentadiene

-------
                                                                                      Page 23 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                           Project:

                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:
                Bpfors/Nobel
              Superfund Site
                 !     BOF-4
                           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1B061100ASOMO  1B071017ASOMO  1A241146ESOMO  1A291159ESOMO
      1490             1500             1219              1268
       8                 8                3
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2-Chloronaphthalene                ND
 2-Nitroaniline                      ND
 Dimethylphthalate                  ND
 Acenaphthylene                    ND
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene                  ND
 3-Nitroaniline                      ND
 Acenaphthene                      ND
 2,4-Dinitrophenol                   ND
 Dibenzofuran                      ND
 4-Nitrophenol                      ND
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene                  ND
 Diethylphtlialate                    ND
 Fluorene                          ND
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether           ND
 4-Nitroaniline                      ND
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol           ND
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine             ND
 4-Bromophenylphenylether           ND
 Hexachlorobenzene                 ND
 Pentachlorophenol                 ND
 Phenanthrene                      ND
 Anthracene                       ND
 Di-n-butylphthalate                 ND
 Fluoranthene                      ND
 Pyrene                            ND
 Butylbenzylphthalate               < PQL
 Benzo(a)anthracene                ND
 Chrysene                         ND
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate           44.5
 Di-n-octy]phthalate                < PQL
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene       .       ND
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene               ND
 Bengofalpyrene                    ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                       
-------
                                                                                       Page 24 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                              Project:

                                     Report Number:
                                             Revision:
                                Bofors/Nobel
                               Superfund Site
                                       BOF-4
                                            0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
  1B061100ASOMO  1B071017ASOMO
        1490             1500
         8                 8
           1A241146ESOMO 1A2911S9ESOMO
                 1219              1268
                   3                3
Target Compound List Aoalytes
 Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(ajh)anthracene               ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                 ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                      33.3
 Phenol d-6                          27.1
 Nitrobenzene d-5                    23.9
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                    10.9
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol                29.1
 4-terphenyl d-14                    21.2
 Ocsafluorobiphenyl                  21.1
 9-Phenvlflnthracene
        23.2
                          ND
                          ND
                          ND
62.6
55.0
95.7
59.9
95.5
84.5
79.6
110
                  ND
                  ND
                  ND
                                           76.8
                                           73.5.
                                           93.3
                                           87.3
                                           99.8
                                           863
                                           56.0
                                           79.6
ND
ND
ND
80.2
69.9
97.5
89.8
117
83.2
60.1
70.6
ND - Not Detected
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC/ 5970B MSD
              Analyst

       Lab Supervisor
a	
                                                                      Date         I   />£/*? "X
                                           Date          1
                                             271
-------
                                                                                         Page 25 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                   Project:

                                                          Report Number:
                                                                  Revision:
  Bofors/Nobel
Superfund Site
        BOF-4
              0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                       1A311OOOESOMO   1B051047ESOMO  1B071010ESOMO  1B071010ESOMO
                             1348               1407              1499           1499 (DUP)
                              3                 8                 8                8
      Collection Date              10-31-91
      Extraction Date              10-31-91
        Analysis Date              11-22-91
Analyte/Concentration             (fig/train)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                            ND
 Azobenzene                        ND
 Benzidine                          ND
 33'-Dichlorobenzidine               ND

Target Compound List Analytes
 Phenol                             29.4
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene     •            ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether           ND
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane                   ND
 Nitrobenzene                       ND
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                      ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol                  ND
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                        ND
 4-Chloroaniline                     ND
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                ND
 TTftYnchlrwocvclonentfldiGnG           NID
                                                    11-05-91
                                                    11-05-91:
                                                    11-27-91
                                                    (/Lig/train)
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      35.5
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                      ND
                                                               11-07-91
                                                               11-07-91
                                                               12-02-91
                                                              Og/train)
                                                                 ND
                                                                 ND
                                                                 ND
                                                                 ND
                                                               
-------
                                                                                    Page 26 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
        Project:

Report Number:
       Revision:
  Bofors/Nobel
Superfund Site
        BOF-4
             0
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Lagoon Number
1A311000ESOMO
1348
3
1B051047ESOMO
1407
8
1B071010ESOMO
1499
8
1B071010ESOMO
1499 (DUP)
8
Target Compound List Analytc
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-ChloronaphthaIene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
4-Nitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
Fluorene
4-Chlorophenylphenylether
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
4-Bromophenylphenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Di-n-butylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzofa)ovrene
a
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
16.0
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
                                                                                       Page 27 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                            Project:.

                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:
               Bofors/Nobel
              Superfund Site
                      BOF-4
                           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A31100OESOMO  1B051047ESOMO  1B071010ESOMO  1B071010EISOMO
      1348             1407              1499          1499 (DIJP)
       3            ;     8                8                 8
Target Compound List Analytes
 Ihdeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene               ND
 Benzo(g4i4)perylene                 ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-FluorophenoI                      74.2
 Phenol d-6                          55.9
 Nitrobenzene d-5                    84.3
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                    82.9
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol                97.4
 4-Terphenyl d-14            .        53.9
 Octafluorobiphenyl                   66.4
 9-Phenylanthracene	55.6
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        64.1
                        47.9
                        85.9
                        42^
                        66.1
                        63.0
                        34.2
                        62.5
ND
ND
ND
68.9
62.5
98.4
93.4
88.5
68.2
73.9
100
ND
ND
ND
78.1
66.8
102
48.1
84.0
56.6
81.6
90.6
ND - Not Detected  NS-Not Spiked                 ;
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
             Analyst
                   *•«
       Lab Supervisor
                                         Date

                                         Date
                                              274
-------
                                                                                        Page 28 of 41
 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
 By EPA Method 8270
                                             Project:

                                    Report Number:
                                            Revision:
                 Bofors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                       BOF-4
                             0
    Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
              Matrix
1A241510QOOMM 1A24152OQOXMM1A291014QZXMO
       1216              1217              1270
   XTN Solvent         XAD-2        Filter+XAD-2
       Collection Date               10-24-91
       Extraction Date               10-24-91
        Analysis Date               11-18-91
Anatyte / Concentration             (fig/train)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                            ND
 Azobenzene                        ND
 Benzidine                          ND
 33'-Dichlorobenzidine               ND

Target Compound List Analytes
 Phenol                             ND
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND-
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 'ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chlorbisopropyl)ether           ND
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane                   ND
 Nitrobenzene                       ND
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND -
 Bis(2-chloroetho2cy)inethane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol                  ND
 1^,4-Trichlorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                        ND
 4-Chloroaniline                     ND
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                 ND
 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene	ND
                       10-24-91
                       10-2441
                       11-18-91
                      Gig/train)
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                         ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
 10-29-91
 10-29-91
 12-02-91
(/ig/train)
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
ND - Not Detected NS-Not Spiked
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
             Analyst
                                         Date

                                         Date
                                               275
-------
                                                                                       Page 29 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                  Project:

                                                         Report Number:
                                                               . Revision:
                                 Bofors/Nobel
                               Superfund Site
                                       BOF-4
                                   !          0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                     1A241510QOOMM 1A241520QOXMM1A291014QZXMO
                            1216              1217              1270
                        XTN Solvent         XAD-2      •  Filter + XAD-2
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
 2-Chloronaphthalene
 2-Nitroaniline
 Dimethylphthalate
 Acenaphthylene
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
 3-Nitroaniline
 Acenaphthene
 2,4-Dinitrophenol
 Dibenzofuran
 4-Nitrophenol
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
 Diethylphthalate
 Fluorene
 4-Chlorophenylpheriylether
 4-Nitroaniline
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
 4-Bromophenylphenylether
 Hexachlorobenzene
 Pentachlorophenol
 Phenanthrene
 Anthracene
 Di-n-burylphthalate
 Fluoranthene
 Pyrene
 Butylbenzylphthalate
 Benzo(a)anthracene
 Chrysene
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
 Di-n-octylphthalate
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
 Benzofa^vrene        :
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
                            ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
 ND
-------
                                                                                      Page 30 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                            Project:

                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:
               Bofors/Nobel
              Superfund Site
                      BOF-4
                           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A241510QOOMM 1A241S20QOXMM1A291014QZXMO
      1216              1217              1270
   XTN Solvent        XAD-2        Filter + XAD-2
Target Compound List Analytes
 Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene              ND
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene              ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                ND

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                     79.4
 Phenol d-6                         99.6
 Nitrobenzene d-5                   87.7
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                   833
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol               93.8
 4-Terphenyl d-14                   85.4
 Octafluorobiphenyl                  NS
 9-Phenvlanthracene                 NS
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        TL5
                        89.7
                        82.4
                        56.8
                        95.6
                        84.4
                        883
                        81.1
ND
ND
ND
62.1
73.1
80.5
81.9
68.1
95.1
NS
NS
ND - Not Detected  NS - Not Spiked
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
             Analyst
                  •».
       Lab Supervisor
Date

Date
                                                      \   I
                                                      ) ././S"/
                                             Til
-------
                                                                                        Page 31 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                            Project:

                                    Report Number:
                                           Revision:
                                                                               Bofors/Nobel
                                                                             Superfund Site
                                                                                  ;   BOF-4
                                                                                           0
Matrix Spikes

   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1B010830FGOMS  1B010830FGOMP 1BQ613S5TGOMS  1B0613S5TGOMP
      1497              1498              1545              1546
       8                 8                 8                8
      Collection Date              11-01-91
      Extraction Date              11-07-91
        Analysis Date              11-15-91
Analyte / Concentration            (% REC)

POHC Analytes
 Aniline                             94.7
 Azobenzene                        116
 Benzidine                          112
 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine               191

Target Compound List Analytes
Analyte / Concentration           (mg/kg)
 Phenol                             ND
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether           ND
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ND
 Hexachloroethane                   ND
 Nitrobenzene                       ND
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol          "       ND
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                        ND
 4-Chloroaniline                     ND
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                ND
 Hexnchlorocvclooentadiene           ND
                      11-01-91
                      11-07-91
                      11-15-91
                      (%REC)
                        97.6
                        111
                        121
                        161
                      (mg/kg)
                      ;  ND
                        ND
                      i  ND
                      ;  ND
                      !  ND
                        ND
                        ND
                      :  ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                      1  ND
                      ;  ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                      ':  ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                      >  ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                                                              11-06-91
                                                              11-13-91
                                                              12-06-91
                                                              (%REC)
                                                                94.6
                                                                75.7
                                                                71.2
                                                                110
                                                              (mg/kg)
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND-
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
                                                                ND
 11-06-91
 11-13-91
 12-06-91
(%REC)
  99.7
  74.8
  79.0
   118
 (mg/kg)
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ;ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ;ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  !ND
  ;ND
  ND
  :ND
  ND
  !ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  !ND
  ND
  :ND
ND - Not Detected Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
      Analyst^

Lab Supervisor
                                         Date

                                         Date
                                                                                    /  / /S"/
                                                278
-------
                                                                                         Page 32 of 41
 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
 By EPA Method 8270
                                                                    Project:

                                                            Report Number:
                                                                   Revision:
                 Bofors/Nobel
                Superfund Site
                        BOF-4
                             0
 Matrix Spikes

    Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                       1B010830FGOMS 1B010830FGOMP  1B061355TGOMS  1B061355TGOMP
                              1497              1498              1545              1546
                               8                 8                8                8
Target Compound List Analytes
Analyte / Concentration           (mg/kg)
  2,4,6-Trichlorophenol                 ND
  2,4,5-Trichlorophenol                 ND
  2-ChloronaphthaIene                 ND
  2-Nitroaniline                       ND
  Dimethylphthalate           •        ND
  Acenaphthylene                      ND
  2,6-Dinitrotoluene                   ND
  3-Nitroaniline                       ND
  Acenaphthene          .             ND
  2,4-Dinitrophenol                    ND
  Dibenzofuran '                       ND
  4-Nitropfaenol                       ND
  2,4-Dinitrotoluene                   ND
  Diethylphthalate                     ND
  Fluorene                            ND
  4-Chlorophenylphenylether      .      ND
  4-Nitroaniline                       ND
  4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol            ND
  N-N3trosodiphenylamine              ND
.  4-Bromophenylphenylether            ND
  Hexachlorobenzene                  ND
  Pentachlorophenol                   ND
  Phenanthrene                        ND
  Anthracene                          ND '
  Di-n-butylphthalate                  ND
  Fluoranthene                        ND
  Pyrene                              ND
  Butylben2ylphthalate                 ND
  Benzo(a)anthracene                 ND
  Chrysene                           ND
  Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate            ND
  Di-n-octylphthalate                  ND
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene         .       ND
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene                ND
  Benzo fa) pyrene	ND
                                              (mg/kg)
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
                                                ND
(mg/kg)
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
-------
                                                                                   Page 33 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                              Project:

                                                      Report Number:
                                                             Revision:
  Bqfors/Nobel
Superfund Site
        BOF-4
    :         0
Matrix Spikes

   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
     Lagoon Number
                     1B010830FGOMS 1B010830FGOMP  1B061355TGOMS 1B0613S5TGOMP
                          1497          ".  1498              1545             1546
                            8                8                8              ! 8
Analyte / Concentration
Ihdeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Dibenz(aji)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Surrogate Compound (%
2-Fluorophenol
Phenol d-^6
Nitrobenzene d-5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol

(mg/kg)
ND
ND
ND
Recovery)
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
(mg/kg)
ND
ND
1 ND

Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
Dil
(mg/kg)
ND
ND
ND

51.3
88.1
90.5
94.4
38.7
98.1
(mg/kg)
ND
:ND
ND

'483
'90.0
94.3
94.4
T/\ *•»
;30.3
84.2
ND - Not Detected Dil - Dilution too high to quantitate
Instrumentation : Hewlett Packard 5880 GC/ 5970B MSD
      Analyst

Lab Supervisor
                                                                   Date

                                                                   Date
                                             280
-------
                                                                                        Page 34 of 41
Gas Chromatograpliy/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                    Project:


                                                           Report Number:
                                                                  Revision:
                Bofors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                       BOF-4
                             0
Matrix Spikes

   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                      1A241722BGOMS 1A241722BGOMP 1A311000QOXMS:1A311000QOXMP
                             1562             1563              1346              347
                              3                 3               NA              NA
      Collection Date              10-24-91
      Extraction Date              11-13-91
        Analysis Date              12-05-91
Analy te / Concentration            (% REC)

POHC Anatytes
 Aniline           N                73.1
 Azobenzene                        61.0
 Benzidine                          313
 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine               68.2

Target Compound List Analytes
Analyte / Concentration            (M&t-)
 Phenol                             ND
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether               ND
 2-Chlorophenol                     ND
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene                 ND
 2-Methylphenol                     ND
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether           ND
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine           ND
 4-Methylphenol                     ,ND
 Hexachloroethane                   ND
 Nitrobenzene                       ND
 Isophorone                         ND
 2-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dimethylphenol                  ND
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane          ND
 2,4-Dichlorophenol                  ND
 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene               ND
 Naphthalene                 '       ND
 4-Chloroaniline                     ND
 Hexachlorobutadiene                ND
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol             ND
 2-Methylnaphthalene                ND
 Hexacnlorocvclooentadiene           ND
                                             10-24-91
                                             11-13-91
                                             12-05-91
                                            (%REC)
                                               66.8
                                               58.2
                                               313
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
                                               ND
 10-31-91
 10-31-91
 11-26-91
(%REC)
   114
   101
   139
   103
Oxg/train)
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  10-31-91
  10-31-91
  11-22-91
 (%REC)
    52.1
    683
    52.7
    97.9
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
    ND
ND - Not Detected NS-Not Spiked
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSB
      Analyst

Lab Supervisor Q^
                                    >
-------
                                                                                    Page 35 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                           Project:


                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:
                 Bofors/Nobel
                Superfund Site
                       BOF-4
                            0
Matrix Spikes

   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
     Lagoon Number
 1A241722BGOMS  1A241722BGOMP
       1562              1563
        3                3
11000QOXMS 1A311000QOXMP
  1346             1 347
  NA              NA
Target Compound List Analytes
Analyte / Concentration           (mg/kg)
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol               ND
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol               ND
 2-ChIoronaphthalene               ND
 2-Nitroaniline                     ND
 Dimethylphthalate                 ND
 Acenaphthylene                   ND
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene                 ND
 3-Nitroaniline                     ND
 Acenaphthene                     ND
 2,4-Dinitrophenol                  ND
 Dibenzofuran                     ND
 4-Nitrophenol                     ND
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene                 ND
 Diethylphthalate                   ND
 Fluorene                         ND
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether          ND
 4-Nitroaniline                     ND
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol          ND
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine            ND
 4-Bromophenylphenylether          ND
 Hexachlorobenzene                 ND
 Pentachlorophenol                 ND
 Phenanthrene                     ND
 Anthracene                       ND
 Di-n-butylphthalate                 ND
 Fluoranthene                     ND
 Pyrene                           ND
 Butylbenzylphthalate               ND
 Benzo(a)anthracene                ND
 Chrysene    "                     ND
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate           49.9
 Di-n-octylphthalate                 ND
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene               ND
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene               ND
 Benzofalovrene                   ND
                      (mg/kg)
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                        ND
                      
-------
                                                                                    Page 36 of 41
 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
 By EPA Method 8270
                     Project:

             Report Number:
                   Revision:
                     Bofors/Nobel
                   Superfund Site
                           BOF-4
                                0
Matrix Spikes

   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1A241722BGOMS
      1562
       3
Target Compound List Analytes
Analyte / Concentration           (mg/kg)
 Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene             ND
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene              ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene                ND
1A241722BGOMP
      1563
       3
(mg/kg)
  ND.
  ND
-------
                                                                                      Page 37 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                          Project:

                  Report Number:
                         Revision:
                Bofors/Nobel
              Superfund Site
                      BOF-4
                           0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
              Matrix

      Collection Date
      Extraction Date
        Analysis Date
Anafyte / Concentration

POHCAnalytes
 Aniline
 Azobenzene
 Benzidine
 33'-Dichlorobenzidine

Target Compound List Anatytes
 Phenol
 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
 2-Chloropheuol
 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
 2-Methylphenol
 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
 N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
 4-Methylphenol,
 Hexachloroe thane
 Nitrobenzene
 Isophorone
 2-Nitrophenol
 2,4-Dimethylphenol
 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
 2,4-Dichlorophenol
 1,2,4-TrichIorobenzene
 Naphthalene
 4-Chloroaniline
 Hexachlorobutadiene
 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
 2-Methylnaphthalene
 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
                             1B06O955BGOMF
                                   1542
                              Scrubber Liquor

                                 11-06-91
                                 Il-llr91
                                 12-05-91
1B07O8S5BGOMF 1B1116OOQGOMM 1B131SOOQGOM&
      1561             1538              1559
 Scrubber Liquor      DI Water         DI Water
     11-07-91
     11-13-91
     12-05-91
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   , ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   ND
                                   NP
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
11-11-91
11-11-91
12-09-91
 (WI/L)
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
11-13-91
11-13-91
12-09-91
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
  ND
ND - Not Detected
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
              Analyst

       Lab Supervisor
                                               284
-------
                                                                                        Page 38 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                                                   Project:

                                                          Report Number:
                                                                 Revision:
                Bofors/Nobel
               Superfund Site
                       BOF-4
                            0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
                      1B060955BGOMF  1B070855BGOMF 1B1116OOQGOMM1B131500QGOMM
                            1542              1561             1538              1559
                       Scrubber Liquor    Scrubber Liquor      DI Water          DI Water
Target Compound List Analytes
 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol                ND
 2-Chloronaphthalene                 ND
 2-Nitroaniline                       ND
 Dimethylphthalate                   ND
 Aceriaphthylene                     ND
 2,6-Dinitrotoluene           "        ND
 3-Nhroaniline                       ND
 Acenaphthene                       ND
 2,4-Dinitrophenol                    ND
 Dibenzofuran                       ND
 4-Nitrophenol                       ND
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene                   ND
 Diethylphthalate                     ND
 Fluorene                           ND
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether            ND
 4-Nitroaniline     -                  ND
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol            ND
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine              ND
 4-Bromophenylphenylether            ND
 Hexachlorobenzene                  ND
 Pentachlorophenol                   ND
 Phenanthrene                       ND
 Anthracene                         ND
 Di-n-butylphthalate                  ND
 Fluoranthene                     < PQL
 Pyrene                           < PQL
 Butylbenzylphthalate               < PQL
 Benzo(a)anthracene                  ND
 Chrysene                           ND
 B5s(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate          < PQL
 Di-n-octylphthalate                  ND
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene              < PQL
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene            .    ND
 Benzo(a)pyrene  	< PQL
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                              ND
                                             
-------
                                                                                     Page 39 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy Report
By EPA Method 8270
                                           Project:


                                   Report Number:
                                          Revision:
               Bofors/Nobel
             Superfund Site
                     BOF-4
                          0
   Sample ID Number
 Master Index Number
      Lagoon Number
1B0609S5BGOMF 1B070855BGOMF 1B111600QGOMM 1B131500QGOMM
      1542           ,  1561             1538             1559
 Scrubber Liquor   Scriibber Liquor      DI Water         Dl Water
Target Compound List Analytes
 Ihdeno(l>2>c,d)pyrene            < PQL
 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene               ND
 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene               < PQL

Surrogate Compound (% Recovery)
 2-Fluorophenol                     77.1
 Phenol d-6                         825
 Nitrobenzene d-5                    86.0
 2-Fluorobiphenyl                    88.1
 2,4,6-Tribromophenol                89.2
 4-Terohenvl d-14             •       92.7
                      
-------
                                                                                Page 40 of 41
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy
Report By EPA Method 8270
                               Project:

                       Report Number:
                              Revision:
                             Bofors/Nobel
                           Superfund Site
                                     BOF-4
                                           0
Target Compound List Analyte
Lagoon # 3
   Feed
   PQL
  (mg/kg)
Lagoon #8
   Feed
   POL
  (mg/kg)
 Kiln
 Ash
 PQL
(rag/kg)
  Flue
  Gas
  PQL
(/ig/train)
                                                                                  Scrubber
                                                                                   Liquor
                                                                                   PQL
Aniline
Azobenzene
Benzidine
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Phenol
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
4-Methylphenol
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2,4- Dime thylphenol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
2,4-Dichlorophenol
l£,4-Trichlorbbenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,43-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethylphthalate
Acenaphthylene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene '.
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2 4™T?iTiitropliciiol
2000
2000
2000
2000
2500
1000
2500
1000
1000
1000
2500
1000
1000
2500
1000
1000
1000
2500
2500
1000
2500
1000
1000
1000
1000
2500
1000
1000
2500
2500
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2500
100
100
100
100
125
50.0
125
50.0
50.0
50.0
125
50.0
50.0
125
50.0
50.0
50.0
125
125
50.0
125
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
125
50.0
50.0
125
125
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
125
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.50
1.00
2.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.50
1.00
1.00
2.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
230
230
1.00
230
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
230
1.00
1.00
230
230
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
230
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
25.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
25.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
25.0
10.0
,10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
25.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
25.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
25.0
io.o
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
ND - Not Detected
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
             Analyst

       Lab Supervisor^ ^^* ^
                                Date

                                Date
                                            287
-------
                                                                                         Page 41 of 41
 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy
 Report By EPA Method 8270
                                Project:

                      Report Number:
                              Revision:
                                 Bofors/Nobel
                                Suiperfund Site
                                       ;    BOF-4
                                                 0
                                   Lagoon # 3
                                      Feed
                                      POL
Target Compound List Analyte     (mg/kg)'
 Dibenzofuran
 4-Nitrophenol
 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
 Diethylphthalate
 Fluorene
 4-Chlorophenylphenylether
 4-Nitroaniline
 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
 4-Bromophenylphenylether
 Hexachlorobenzene
 Pentachlorophenol
 Phenantbrene
 Anthracene
 Di-n-butylphthalate
 Fluoranthene
 Pyrene
 Butylbenzylphthalate
 Benzo(a)anthracene
 Chrysene
 Bis(2-eth.yttusyl)phthalate
 Di-n-octylphthalate
 Benzo(b)£luoranthene
 Benzo(k)fluoranthene
 Benzo(a)pyrene
 Indeno(l,2,3-c>d)pyrene
 Dibeuz(aji)anthracene
 Benzofg.h.flpervlene
1000
2500
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2500
1000
1000
1000
2500
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
  Lagoon #8
     Feed
;     POL
I    (mg/kg)

     50.0
     125
j     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
!     125
     50.0
     50.0
i     50.0
;     125
!     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
!     50.0
!     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
I     50.0
',     50.0
1     50.0
     50.0
     50.0
                                Kiln       Flue
                                Ash       Gas
                                PQL       POL
                               (mg/kg)   0*g/train)
                     Scrubber
                     Liquor
                      PQL
1.00
230
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
250
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.O
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
25.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
ND- Not Detected
Instrumentation: Hewlett Packard 5880 GC / 5970B MSD
              Analyst
                    •*•
       Lab Supervisor
                                Date

                                Date
                                               288;
-------
     APPENDIX C-4




TRACE METAL ANALYSES
         289
-------
Acurex Corporation  (C-1086)                                    January 6, 1992
c/o NCTR, Bldg.  45
Jefferson, AR  72079

ATTN:  Mr. Dennis Tabor                                       Control No. 4979R2
Description of Sample:   Four  (4)  soil,  six  (6) water and two (2) filter/water
                         samples received  on  11/6/91
Results:
                             SEE ATTACHED DATA SHEETS
Method:   EPA 3010, 3050, 6010, 7470, 7471, 7060

Remarks:  Chains of custody and analysis request records submitted with inital
          report.
JO/td
                                      290
-------
    Mr.  Dennis Tabor
    Acurex Corporation
    Jefferson, Arkansas
    Parameter
Unit
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Lead
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
Parameter
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Lead
Silver
Selenium
Chromium
Parameter
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Lead
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
Unit
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
.ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
Unit
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
     1275  -
1A280900FGOOO
   10/28/91

     1.1
                                   18
                                  <0.2
                                   9.9
                                   400
                                  <1
                                  <20
                                   25

                                   1341
                              1A311315T6000
                                 10/31/91

                                   8.3
                                   38
                                  <0.2
                                   1.9
                                   29
                                  <1
                                  <20
                                   59

                                   1290
                              1A231100FGOTO
                                 10/23/91

                                  <0.05
                                  <0.05
                                  <0.1
                                   0.084
                                  <0.002
                                  <0.005
                                  <0.1
                                  <0.01
                                  <0.2
                                  <0.01
     1278
1A281030FGOOO
   10/28/91
                                 17
                                <0.2
                                 11
                                 510
                                <1
                                <20
                                 26

                                 1282
                            1A291753BGOOO
                               10/29/91

                                 0.40
                                <0.05
                                <0.1
                                 0.26
                                <0.002
                                 0.44
                                 24
                                <0.01
                                <0.2
                                 0.29

                                 1288
                            1A241500TGOTO
                               10/24/91

                                 0.056
                                <0.05
                                <0:1
                                 0.19
                                <0.002
                                <0.005
                                <0.1
                                <0.01
                                <0.2
                                <0.01
 January 6, 1992
 Control No. 4979R2
 Data Sheet 1

    1280
1A291530TGOOO
   10/29/91

     7.8
                                         47
                                        <0.2
                                         2.4
                                       " 29
                                        <1
                                        <20
                                         63

                                        1289
                                    1A211530FGOTO
                                       10/21/91

                                        <0.05
                                        <0.05
                                     ;   
-------
    Mr.  Dennis Tabor
    Acurex Corporation
    Jefferson, Arkansas
                         January 6,  1992
                         Control No.  4979R2
                         Data Sheet  2
                          Parameter
                          Arsenic
                          Mercury
                          Antimony
                          Bari urn
                          Beryllium
                          Cadmium
                          Lead
                          Si 1ver
                          Selenium
                          Chromium-
Unit
 ppm
 ppm
 ppm
 ppm
 ppm
 ppm
 ppm
 ppm
 ppm
 ppm
    1301
1A311000EMIOO
  10/31/91

   <0.05
   <0.05
   <0.1
    0.053
   <0.002
   <0.005
   <0.1
   <0.01
   <0.2
   <0.01
                              1266
                          1A291158EMPOO
    Parameter     Unit      10/29/91
    Arsenic         ug       <40
    Mercury         ug       <10
    Antimony        ug       <40
    Barium          ug        21
    Beryllium       ug       <0.8
    Cadmium         ug        540
    Lead            ug        15000
    Silver          ug       <4
    Selenium     "   ug       <80
    Chromium        ug        38
1302



1A311000EMPOO
10/31/91
<200
1 <200
<200
35
i <0o8
630
19000
<20
<400
36
of Anal
11/7/91,
11/8/91,
11/7/91,
11/7/91,.
11/7/91,
11/7/91,
11/7/91,
11/7/91,
11/7/91,
11/7/91,
vsis
9:00 am
8:00 am
9:00 am
9:00 am
9:00 am
9:00 am
9:00 am
9:00 am
9:00 am
9:00 am
Anal vst
61/86
86
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
D Chemistry — Materials Science — Microbiology
                                          292
-------
    Acurex Corporation (C-1086)
    c/o NCTR, Bldg. 45
    Jefferson, AR  72079

    ATTN:  Mr. Dennis Tabor
              January 6, 1992
              Control No. 4888R3
    Description of Sample:  Three (3) soil, two (2) wattY and one (1) filter/water
                            samples received on 10/31/91-
    Results:
                                 SEE ATTACHED DATA SHEET
    Method:    EPA 3010, 3050, 6010, 7060, 7470, 7071

    Remarks:   Chain of custody and analysis request record submitted with initial
              report.
    JO/td
                                                     AMERICAN INTERPLEX CORPORATION
By_	
          John Overbey ^x
       Laboratory Manager V
          Spectroscopy  //
D Chemistry — Materials Science — Microbiology
                                        293
-------
 Mr. Dennis  T~hor
 Acurex  Corporation
 Jefferson,  Arkansas
 Parameter
Unit
    1207
1A211530F6000
   10/21/91
    1208
1A231100FGOOO
   10/23/91
 January 6, 1992
 Control No. 4888R3
 Data Sheet

   1214 !
1A241500TGOOO
   10/24/91
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Lead
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
Arsenic
Mercury


Parameter
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Lead
Silver
Selenium
Chromium
Arsenic
Mercury,








•




ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm


Unit
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm













<10
17
<0.2
11
490
<1
<20
29
2.3
<1
1210
1A241722BGOOO
10/24/91
<0.1
0.33
<0.002
0.49
12
<0.01
<0 = 2
0.33
0.51
<0.05



Parameter
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmium
Lead
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
Arsenic
i

\
S£
i


i
l
i
1211
<10
16
<0.2
12
480
<1
<20
31
1.1
<1

<10
42
<0.2
2.3
30
<1
<20
79
12
<1

1A24I1146EMIOO Date/Time
10/24/91
<0.1
0.049
<0.002
0.022
0.31
<0.01
<0.2
<0.01
<0.05
-
i


Unit
U9
ug
ug
ug
ug
U9
ug
ug
ug
of Anal
10/31/91,
10/31/91 ,
10/31/91,
10/31/91,
10/31/91,
10/31/91,
10/31/91,
10/31/91,
11/07/91,
10/31/91,

1225
1A241146EMPOO
10/24/91
<30
21
<0.5
440
13000
<3
<50
85
120
vsis
1:00 pm
1:00 pm
1:00 pm
1:00 pm
1:00 pm
1:00 pm
1:00 pm
1:00 pm
9:00 am
11:30 am













                                                                             61
                                                                             61
                                                                             61
                                                                             61
                                                                             61
                                                                             61
                                                                             61
                                                                             61
                                                                             86
                                                                             86
Chemistry — Materials Science — Microbiology
                                           i

                                        294
-------
  Acurex Corporation (C-1086)
  c/o NCTR, Bldg. 45
  Jefferson, AR  72079

  ATTN:   Mr. Dennis Tabor
January 6, 1992
Control No. 5143R1
  Description of Sample:  Nineteen (19) water, five (5) soil, and seven (7) filter/
                          probe wash samples received on 11/18/91
  Results:
                              SEE ATTACHED DATA SHEETS
  Method:    EPA 3010,  3050, 6010, 7060, 7470, 7471

  Remarks:   Chain of custody and analysis request records submitted with initial
            report.
  JO/bp
                                                   AMERICAN INTERPLEX CORPORATION
                                                             John Overbey
                                                          Laboratory Manager
                                                             Spectroscopy
Chemistry — Materials Science — Microbiology
                                        295
-------
    Mr.  Dennis Tabor
    Acurex Corporation
    Jefferson, Arkansas
    Parameter
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmium
Silver
Selenium
Chromium
Lead
Parameter
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
Lead
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Unit
mg/1
' mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
    Parameter
    Arsenic
    Mercury
    Antimony
    Barium
    Beryllium
    Cadmium
    Silver
    Selenium
    Chromium
    Lead
               1554
           1A281030FGOTO
Unit         10/28/91
                                     <0.001
                                     <0.05
                                     <0.1
                                      0.094
                                     <0.002
                                     <0.005
                                     <0.01
                                     <0.2
                                     <0.01
                                      1552
                                  1A311315TGOTO
                                    10/31/91

                                      0.014
                                     <0.05
                                     <0.1
                                      0.23
                                     <0.002
                                     <0.005
                                     <0.01
                                     <0.2     !
                                      0.043   !
               1556    ;
           1B051355TGOTO
              11/5/91
            % Recovery at
Unit        Level Spiked
mg/1      75.2/87.2 @ Q.25
mg/1      102/107 @ 0.25
mg/1      86-.0/89.2 @ 2.5
mg/1   .   78.4/79.6 9 0.25
mg/1      78.8/78.4 @ 0.25
mg/1      79.2/78.4 9 0.5
mg/1      90.0/83.2 9 0.5
mg/1      93.6/9J.6 § 2.5
mg/1      87.2/81.2 9 0.5
mg/1      85.1/83.6 9 1.0
    1553
1A280900FGOTO
  10/28/91

   0.0027
  <0.05
  <0.1
   0.10
  <0.002
  <0.005
  <0.01
  <0.2
  <0.01
   0.15

    1556
1B051355TGOTO
   11/5/91

   <0.001
   <0.05
   <0.1
    0.38
   <0.002
   <0.005
   <0.01
   <0.2
    0.72
    1557
1B061355TGOTO
   11/6/91

   <0.001
   <0.05
   <0.1
    0.41
   <0.002
   <0.005
   <0.01
   <0.2
    0.99
January 6, 1992
Control No. 5143R1
Data Sheet 1

         1555
     1A291530TGOTO
       10/29/91
                                                    1:
         0.016
        <0.05
          1.1
           ,23
        <0.002
        <0.005
        <0.01
        <0.2
         0.030
                                                1556 Duplicate
                                                 1B051355T60TO
                                                    11/5/91

                                                    <0.001
                                                    <0.05
                                                    <0.1
                                                     0.37
                                                    <0.002
                                                    <0.005
                                                    <0.01
                                                    <0o2
                                                     0.72
         1558
     1B071320TGOTO
        11/7/91

        <0.001
        <0.05
        <0.1
         0.38
        <0.002
        <0.005
        <0.01
        <0.2
        : 0.82
D Chemistry — Materials Science —? Microbiology
                                           296
-------
   Mr. Oenm's  Tabor
   Acurex  Corporation
   Jefferson,  Arkansas
    Parameter	   Unit
    Arsenic
    Mercury
    Antimony
    Bari urn
    Beryl1i urn
    Cadmi urn
    Silver
    Selenium
    Chromium
    Lead
    Parameter
    Arsenic
    Mercury
    Antimony
    Barium
    Beryl 1i urn
    Cadmi urn
    Silver
    Selenium
    Chromi urn
   .Lead
    Parameter
    Arsenic
    Antimony
    Bari um
    Beryl 1i um
    Cadmi um
    Silver
    Selenium
    Chromi um
    Lead
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Unit
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Unit
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
    1531
1B071010EMIOO
   11/7/91

   <0.001
    0.044
   <0.002
   <0.005
   <0.01
   <0.2
   <0.01
    1364
1B051626BGOOO
   11/5/91

    0.19
   <0.05
   <0.1
    0.18
   <0.002
    0.052
   <0.01
   <0.2
    0.22
    10
     1527
 1B051047EMIOO
    11/5/91

    <0.001
    <0.1
     0.028
    <0.002
    <0.005
    <0.01
    <0.2
    <0.01
     1298
 1A311534BGOOO
   10/31/91

    0.074
   <0.05
   <0.1
    0.059
   <0.002
    0.049
   <0.01
   <0.2
    0.052
    7.6
1364 Duplicate
 1B051626BGOOO
    11/5/91

     0.14
    <0.05
    <0.1
     0.18
    <0.002
     0.052
    <0.01
    <0.2
     0.22
     10
 1527 Duplicate
 1B051047EMIOO
    11/5/91

    <0.001
    <0.1
     0.028
    <0.002
    <0.005
    <0.01
    <0.2
    <0.01
January 6, 1992
Control Wo. 5143R1
Data Sheet 2

         1537
     1B071526QMIOM
     %  11/7/91

        <0.001
         0.056
        <0.002
        <0.005
        <0.01
        <0.2
        <0.01
         1364
     1B051626BGOOO
        11/5/91
     % Recovery at
     Level Spiked

  108/92.4 0 0.25
  103/95.6 0 0.25
  68.0/64.8 0 2.5
  82.2/78.2 0 2
  80.8/77.6 0 0.25
  78.4/74.2 9 0.
  75.4/63.6 0 0
  87.6/83.2 0 2
  79.6/75.8 0 0
  120/120 0 1
,5
.5
,5
,5
         1527
     1B051047EMIOO
       11/5/91
     % Recovery at
     Level Spiked

  120/108 0 0.25
  92.0/93.2 0 2.5
  93.9/96.3 0 0.25
  90.4/92.8 0 0.25
  92.4/92.8 0 0.5
  97.4/97.6 0 0.5
  94.4/96.4 0 2.5
  89.6/91.0 0 0.5
  91.4/90.8 0 1.0
D Chemistry — Materials Science — Microbiology


                                         297
-------
   Mr. Dennis Tabor
   Acurex Corporation
   Jefferson, Arkansas
   Parameter	Unit
   Arsenic
   Mercury
   Antimony
   Barium
   Beryllium
   Cadmium
   Silver
   Selenium
   Chromium
   Lead
    Parameter
tng/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Unit
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Silver
Selenium
Chromium
Lead
Parameter
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
Lead
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Unit
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1.
mg/1
mg/1
    1291
1A291615QGOTM
  10/29/91

   <0.001  ,
   <0.05
   <0.1    !
   <0.01
   <0.002
   <0.005
   <0.01
   <0.2    !
   <0.01
    1528   j
1B010830FGOTO
   11/1/91 i
 % Recovery at
 Level Spiked
           I
110/109 9 0.25
99.6/105 @|0.25
84.0/86.4 9 2.5
87.5/83.9 9 0.25
82.8/78.8 @ 0.25
82.0/78.6 9 0.
                                  82.4/89.2 9 0
                         .5
                         ,5
                                  95.2/92.0 9 2.5
                                  87.4/81.6 $ 0.5
                                  82.1/83.9 @ 1.0

                                       1530
                                   1B061057EMIOO
                                      11/6/91

                                       0.0029
                                       0.048;
                                      <0.002
                                      <0.005
                                      <0.01
                                      <0.2
                                      <0.01
    1528
1B010830FGOTO
   11/1/91

  <0o001
  <0.05
  <0.1
   0.085
  <0.002
  <0.005
  <0.01
  <0o2
  <0.0i
January 6, 1992
Control No. 5143R1
Data Sheet 3

    1528 Duplicate
     1B010830FGOTO
        11/1/91

        <0.001
        <0.05
        <0.1
         0.082
        <0.002
        <0.005
        <0.01
        <0.2
        <0.01
    1529
1B010835FGOTO
   11/1/91

   <0.001
   <0.05
   <0.1
    0.096
   <0.002
   <0.005
   <0.01
   <0.2
   <0.01
                                   1534
                               1B071740BGOOO
                                  11/7/91

                                   0.022
                                  <0.05
                                  <0.1
                                   0.27
                                  <0.002
                                   0.011
                                  <0.01
                                  <0.2
                                   0.16
                                   0.57
          1411
      1B061607BGOOO
         11/6/91

          0.086
         <0.05

          oliis
         <0.002
         <0.005
         <0.01
         <0.2
          0.15
          1.1

          1532
      1B060955BGOOF
         11/6/91

          0.11
         <0.05

          o!is
         <0.002
          0.027

         <0^2
          0.043
          0.7i
D Chemistry — Materials Science — Microbiology
                                          298
-------
  Mr. Dennis Tabor
  Acurex Corporation
  Jefferson, Arkansas
                                            January 6, 1992
                                            Control No. 5143R1
                                            Data Sheet 4
  Parameter
Unit
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Silver
Selenium
Chromium
Lead
Parameter
Arsenic •
Antimony
Barium.
Beryl "I i urn
Cadmium
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
Lead
Parameter
Arsenic
Antimony
Bar i urn
Beryllium
Cadmi urn -
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
Lead
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Unit
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
Unit
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
ug
    1533
1B070855BGOOF
   11/7/91

    0.042
   <0.05
   <0.1
    0.11
   <0.002
   <0.005
   <0.01
   <0.2
    0.026
    0.38
                                    1536
                                1B071530QMPOM
                                   11/7/91

                                     0.34
                                  1452
                              1B071010EMPOO
                                 11/7/91

                                   11
                                     17
                                    <0.2
                                    <0.5
                                    <1
                                    <20
                                     4.1
                                 1366 Duplicate
                                 1B051047EMPOO
                                    11/5/91

                                      29
                                   15
                                  <0.2
                                   7.0
                                  <1
                                  <20
                                   46
                                   210
                                  1414
                              1B061057EMPOO
                                 11/6/91

                                   18
                                          1366
                                      1B051047EMPOO
                                         11/5/91

                                          24
                                          10
                                          19
                                          <0.2
                                          17
                                          <1
                                          <20
                                          76
                                          850
                                      19
                                     <0.2
                                     '17
                                     <1
                                     <20
                                      76
                                      860
                                   18
                                 <0.2
                                   6.4
                                 <1
                                 <20
                                   51
                                   22
Chemistry — Materials Science — Microbiology


                                        299
-------
   Mr. Dennis Tabor
   .Acurex Corporation
   'Jefferson, Arkansas
   Parameter
   Arsenic
   Mercury
   Antimony
   Barium
   Beryllium
   Cadmi urn
   Silver
   Selenium
   Chromium
   Lead
    Parameter
    Arsenic
    Mercury
    Antimony
    Barium
    Beryllium
    Cadmium
    Silver
    Selenium
    Chromium
   •Lead
 Unit
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
 Unit
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
    1517
1B110940QZPOO
  11/11/91
% Recovery at
Level Spiked

 90.8 9 5

 83.8 @ 100
 98.0 @ 5
 86.6 @ 5
 91.6 @ 10
 79
 89
 96
,5  9  10
   @
100
10
 89.0 @ 50
1504 Duplicate
1B010830FGOOO
   11/1/91

    0.83   !
   <0.2
    41
   <0.2
   <0.5
   <1
   <20
    37
                                             January 6, 1992
                                             Control No. 5143R1
                                             Data Sheet 5
                   1518
               1B110941QZPOO
                  11/11/91
               % Recovery at
               Level Spiked

                74.8 9 5
                72.8 @ 100
                95.6 @ 5
                74,8 9
                80.6 9
         5
         10
  80.4 @ 10
  72.0 9 100
  90.1 @ 10
  86.8 @ 50

     1504
 1B010830F6000
    11/1/91
 % Recovery  at
 Level Spiked

98.4/79.2 9  5.0
113/106 @ 5.0
82.3/93.6 @  100
86.8/86.8 @  80
93.6/94.8 9
84.9/84.3
66.4/84.5
90.6/90.6 9
90.4/85.6 9
98.2/99.6 9
                      5
                    9 10
                    9 10
                      100
                      50
                      50
                        1504
                    1B010830FGOOO
                       11/1/91

                        1.1
                       <0.2
                       37
                       <0.2
                       <0.5
                       <1
                       <20
                       26
                                                                            1509
                                                                        1B051355T6000
                                                                             9.4
                                        64
                                      <0.2
                                      
-------
  Wr.  Qenms Tabor
  Acurex Corporation
  Jefferson, Arkansas
                                            January 6, 2992
                                            Control No. 5143R1
                                            Data Sheet 6
  Parameter
Unit
1509 Duplicate
1B051355T6000
   11/5/91
    1509
1B051355TGOOO
   11/5/91
% Recovery at
Level Spiked
    1507
1B010835FGOOO
   11/1/91
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Bari urn
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmium
Silver
Selenium
Chromium
Lead

mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg




.






1511
1B061355TGOOO
Parameter
Arsenic
Mercury
Antimony
Barium
Beryl 1 i urn
Cadmi urn
Silver
Selenium
Chromi urn
Lead
Unit
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
11/6/91
4.2
<0.2
<10
74
<0.2
<0.5
<1
<20
59
12
8.7 120/113 @ 5 0.53
<1 92.0/99.1 @ 5 <0.2
<10 95.3/85.8 @ 100 <10
66 74.2/76.8 
-------
   APPENDIX C-5




CHLORIDE ANALYSES
        302
-------
                                                                                     Page 1 of 3
 HC1 Train/Chloride Report
 By Ion Chromatography
 EPA Method 300.0
        Project:

Report Number:
       Revision:
 Bofors-Nobel
Superfund Site
        BOF-3
             1
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Lagoon Number
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Chloride (mg/1)
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Lagoon Number
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Chloride (mg/1)
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Lagoon Number
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Chloride (mg/1)
1A2211SOSPIOO
1166
3
10-22-91
11-11-91
2.41
1A291155SPIOO
1235
3
10-29-91
11-11-91
2.34
1A311100EPIOO
1299
3
10-31-91
11-12-91
3.17
1A241140SPIOO
1177
3
10-24-91
11-11-91
2.56
1A291155EPIOO
1234
3
10-29-91
11-13-91
0.92
1A311100APIOO
1304
3
10-31-91
11-12-91
440
1A241140EPIOO
1178
3'
10-24-91
11-11-91
12.1
1A291155APIOO
1228
3
10-29-91
11-12-91
175
1B051050SPIOO
1372
8
11-05-91
11-12-91
0.57
1A241213APIOO
1170
3
10-24-91
11-11-91
166
1A310958SPIOO
1305
3
10-31-91
11-12-91
2.32
1B051052EPIOO .
1370 •
8
11-05-91
11-12-91
ND
ND-Not Detected  PQL-0.1 ppm Chloride
.Instrumentation: Dionex4500i   Column: AS10  Eluent: 80mN NaOH
              Anal'
        Lab Supervise;
    Date

    Date
                                                                           Cj
                                             303
-------
                                                                                  Page 2 of 3
HC1 Train/Chloride Report
By Ion Chromatography
EPA Method 300.0
        Project:

Report Number:
      Revision:
 Bofors-Nobel
Superfund Site
        BOF-3
             0
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Lagoon Number
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Chloride (mg/I)
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Lagoon Number
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Chloride (mg/1)
1BOS1045APIOO
1368
8
11-05-91
11-13-91
58.6
1B071005SPIOO
1455
8
11-07-91
11-13-91
5.26
1B061052SPIOO
1421
8
11-06-91
11-12-91
ND
1B071006EPIOO
1449
8
11-07-91
11-13-91
ND
1B061055EPIOO
1418
8
11-06-91
11-12-91
ND
1B071017APIOO
1453
8
11-07-91
11-13-91
30.6
1B0611QOAPIOO
1416
8
11-06-91
11-13-91
30.7
1B071525QPIOM
1535
Blank
11-07-91
11-13-91
ND
ND - Not Detected  PQL - 0.1 ppm Chloride         ,
Instrumentation: Dionex 4500i   Column: AS 10  Eluent: 80mN NaOH
        Lab Supervisor
     Date

     Date
                                                                                      / 97-
                                            304
-------
                                                                                     Page 3 of 3
HC1 Train/Chloride Report
By Ion Chromatography
EPA Method 300.0
                                        Project:

                               Report Number:
                                      Revision:
                                  Bofors-Nobel
                                 Superfund Site
                                         BOF-3
                                               1
Matrix Spikes
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Lagoon Number
Collection Date
Analysis Date
Chloride (mg/1)
Chloride (spike level)
Chloride (% REC)
Duplicates
Sample ID Number
Master Index Number
Lagoon Number
Collection Date
Analysis Date

1B061055EPIOS
1566
8
11-06-91
11-12-91
1.87
2
93.7

1B061O55EPIOD
1418
8
11-06-91
11-12-91
•.
1B061055EPIOP 1B061100APIOS
1566 1567
8 8
11-06-91 11-06-91
11-12-91 11-13-91
1.92 2.53
2 1
96.1 99.8

1B071005SPIOD
1455
8
11-07-91
11-13-91

1B061100APIOP
1567
8
11-06-91
11-13-91
2.66
1
112.7



Chloride (mg/1)

Chloride (% RPD)
ND

0.0
5.27

0.2
ND - Not Detected   PQL - 0.1 ppm Chloride
Instrumentation: Dionex 4500J   Column: AS 10  Eluent: 80mN NaOH
The matrix spike on sample 1567 was a 1 ppm spike of a 20 fold dilution of the original sample.
              Analyst
        Lab Supervisor^ ^x
Date

Date
                                /  /
                                                            I *7 2L
                                             305
-------
        APPENDIX D




SAMPLING TRAIN WORKSHEETS
           306
-------
     APPENDIX D-l




METHOD 5 WORKSHEETS
        307
-------
ISOCINETIC RESM.TS
Plant:  JRF      Updated  11-12-91
Date;   10-Z4-91  Printed  01/02/92
Saapte location:  AFTERBURNER

PARAMETER         v

HoizU DlaMtar,  Actual  (In)
Pitot Tub* Correction Factor
CM Meter Correction Factor
Stick (Duct) D(Mmlon>  (In):
        Radluc (If  round)
        Lanfth (If  rectangular)
        Uldth (If rectangular)
Art* of Stick C«q ft)

* ef Saapla Points  •
Total Saapttng TlM (Bin)
•arcMtrle Prenture (In  Hg)
Stack Preaaure (In H2t»
Caa Matar Initial Reading  (cu ft)
Cta Meter Final Reading  (cu ft)
Ktt CM SaiapU Voluw (cu ft)

Vel ef Liquid Collected (»l)
Vol ef Liq 8 Std. Conda. (acf )
Ut. ef Filter Paniculate (gai)
Ut. of Probe With Paniculate (gai)
Ut of Cabined Paniculate (§•)
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —   1A241213AP
                                   Perforated by:
                                   Teat No./Typa:
                                   Start/Stop Tioe:

                                    SYMBOL    VALUE
                                            (calc.)
                                   N(d>       0.584
                                   C(p)        0.84
                                   (alpha)      0.99
         ED HILL
         1A241213AP
         1213-1441
                                   R
                                   L
                                   U
                                   A(t)

                                   t
                                   (theta)
                                   P(b)
                                   P(atack)
                                               11.63
                                   V(a»
(2.95084 >

      18
( 144.00 }
   29.85
   -0.05
 535.981
 646.342
( 110.36 >
laokineticity
Metercd Sanple Gaa Volum (acf)
Oca)
Stack Gaa Flow, atd cood. (dscfn)
X I
V(a> atd)
V(> atd)
0(a>
•
«
•
•
atd cood. (dscn/erfn)Q(s) «
actual (acfn)
actual 
Partlculat* Leading, dry (gr/dacf)
8 7X ozcgr/elsef >
8 7% 02(Bg/daca)
Particulate Eaisaion Rate (Ib/hr)
^(ks/br)
Stack Caa Water Vapor Proportion
Molecular Weight ef Stack CM. Dry
Uet
Stack Preaaure, absolute (In Hg)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/aec)
fl(a) ;
0(a) •
CO atd)
C(* *td>
C(a atd)
G(p) '
C(p)
9(uo)
H(d)
M(a)
P(a)
V avg) -   119.5
                                                                                                              T(« avg) *    V&.&
                                                                                                              SQRTCdPJ
                                                                                                                           0.274
TOTALS
              144 |   1.35 |  36.0000 | 33138.0  | 2411.0 | 1892.0 |  4.9295
                                                              308
-------
ISOKINETIC RESULTS
Plant:  1RF      Updated   11-12-91  PerfonMd by:      EO MILL
Oates   10-29-91  Printed   01/02/92  Tmt Ho./Typc:     1A29115SAP
Saapte Location:  AFTERBUBNER        Start/Stop T
taroaatric Pressure (in Kg)
Stack Prelaw* (in 1120)
Gaa Meter Initial Reading Ccu ft)
Gas Meter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Gas Staple Volune (cu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected (•!)
Vol of Liq a Std. Conds. (scf)
Ut. of Filter Paniculate (ge>)
Ut. of Probe Wash Paniculate (gn>
Ut of Coabined Particulat* (gn)

02  Concentration  (by CEN)
C02 Concentration  (by CEH)
CO  Concentration  (by CEH)
N2  Concentration  (by diff.)
 SYKSOL    VALUE
          (calc.)
N(d)        0.586
CCp)         0.84
(alpha)      0.99
R
L
U
A(S)

*
(theta)
P(b)
P(stack)
            11.63
                            Stack Gaa Flow,  atd cond.
                                            atd cond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Particulat* Loading,  dry
                                                8 7X 02(gr/dtef) CCs std)  •
                                                8 73 02(a«/dsaa) C(s atd)  •
                            Particulate Eiaisaion Rat*  (Ib/hr)   E(p>     •
                                                       (kg/hr)   E(p)     »
                                    X I
                          (scf J     V(a> std) *
                          (sen)     V(« std) <
                          (dacta)   0(«)
                          (dsc*/e>in)Q(s>
                          (acfa>>    0{a)
                          (ao/aiin) Q(a>
                          (gr/dscf) C(* std)
              95.8
            105.12
             2.977
              1202
              34.0
              5850
             165.7
            0.0164
            0.0234
                53
             0.168
             0.076
V(a»
(2.95084 >

      18
( 144.00 }
    30.1
   -0.05
  692.37
 807.531
( 115.16 )
Stack 6as Uater Vapor Proportion
Kolecular Height, of Stack Cat. Dry
                              Uet
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)
•(no)    •
N(d>     »
M(s)     •
P(s)     •
V(s avg) -
0.043
29.62
29.12
30.10
 33.0
VICe)         100
V(u std) (  4.707 )
           0.0403
           0.0711
M(p)    ( 0.1114 )
              11.2
              7.3
                0
          (  81.50  )
Sample dClock (Velocity] Orifice Stack
Point Time (Head, dPJMeter.dH Tesp
(•in) j(in H20)|(ln H20) (degF)
1 6
2 6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.2
3.4
S.6
7.8






6
12
12
12
12
9,10 | 12
11,12 j 12
•"" 1
TOTALS
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075

2 2014
Gas Hater |SORT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE *
Teop (deaf) j
in | out
99
2 2014 j 107
2 2014
2 2014
2' 2014
2 2014
2 2014
2 2014
2 2014
2 2014
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

144 | 1.35 | 36.0000
2014
2014
2014
2014
119
131
133
139
140
142
142
142
142
142
147
155
2014 155
2014 155
2014 157
2014 158

36252.0
81 0.2739
84 0.2739
Velocity Head (*tic>
Orifice Heter Reading ("we)

87 0.2739 (Stack Teaperature (deg F)
90 0.2739
92 0.2739
96 0.2739
97
99
99
100
101
101
102
106
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
(deg C)

Meter Temperature (deg F)
(deg C)

Root-Mean-Square dP <"«c)




0.2739
106 | 0.2739
107 | 0.2739
108 | 0.2739
111

2505.0 | 1767.0
0.2739

4.9295

                                                                                                               1A2911S5AP

                                                                                                               dP(avg)  *   0.075

                                                                                                               dH(avg)  »   2.000

                                                                                                               T(s *vg) »  2014.0
                                                                                                               T(s avg) «  1101.1

                                                                                                               T(B avg) «   118.7
                                                                                                               T(« avg) •    48.1

                                                                                                               SQRT(dP) •   0.274
                                                              309
-------
1SCK1KETIC RESULTS
Plant:  UF       Updated  11-12-91
Date:   10-31-91   Printed  01/02/92
twple Location:   AFTERBURNER

PARAMETER         V

Koutt Dlaoeter,  Actual (In)
Pilot Tub* Correction Factor
Cat Meter Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) DlMfielone (In):
        Radius (If round)
        Length (If rectangutir)
        Width (If rectaneulir)
Are* of Stack (sej ft)

* of Sacpl* Points
Total Sanpllng Tl«e (uln)
laronetric Pressure (In Hg)
Stack Pressure (In N20)
Cas Hater Initial Reading (cu ft)
CM Heter Final Reading (cu ft)
Nat Gas Staple Volume (cu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected («l)
Vol of Llq a Std. Condi, (scf)
Ut. of Filter Pirtlculate (g»)
Ut. of Probe W»»h Particular (gn)
Ut of Contained Paniculate (g»
              Performed by:
              Test Ho./Type:
              Start/Stop Tla»:

               SYMBOL    VALUE
                        (calc.)
              N(d}        0.586
              C(p)         0.84
              (alpha)      0.99
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —   1A311000AP
         ED HILL
         1A311000AP
         1000-1246
Isoklneticlty
Metared Saaple Gas volume
          X 1
(scf)     V{» std)
(sen)     V(» ctd)
(daeta)   o<»>
.(ducsVMinWs);
(aefo)    Q(«)
(aca/arin) 0(a)
               R
               L
               U
               A(s)

               *
               (theta)
               P{b)
               P(stack)
                           11.63
                            Stack Cas Flow, std cond.
                                           std cond.
                                           actual
                                           actual
                            Particular Loading,  dry   (gr/dscf> C(s std)
                                               8 7X 02(gr/dtcf) C(s std)
                                               S 7X 02C«g/dsc«> C(s std)
                            Partfeulat* Emission  Rat*   (lb/hr)   E(p>
                                                       (ka/hr)   E(p>,
  90.2
103.14
 2.921
  1156
  32.7
  5942
 168.3
0.2179
0.1994
   456
 2.158
 0.979
               V(a)

               Vl(c)
               V(u std)
               H(p)
(2.95084 )

      19
( 156.00 )
   29.78
   -O.OS
 842.285
 955.082
( 112.80 )

     204
(  9.602 )
  0.9517
  0.5046
( 1.4563 )
Stack 6as Hater Vapor Proportion    8(uo)    •   0.085
Molecular Weight of Stack Cas.  Dry  M(d)     «   29.48
                               wet  N(s)     »   28.50
Stack Pressure, absolute (In Hg)    Pd)     «   29.78
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)     V(s avg) «    33.6
02 Concentration (by CEN) X 5.7
C02 Concentration (by CEN) X 7.8
CO Concentration (by CEM) X 0
N2 Concentration (by diff.) X ( 86.50 )
Sanpl* | dClock (Velocity) Orifice
Point j Tine (Head. dPJHeter.dH
j (nin) j(ln H20)j(in H20) '
1 | 6
2 | 6
3 I 6
4 |
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.2
3.4
5.6

9.10
11,12
11,10






0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.0/5
0.075
0.075
| 0.075
6 | 0.075
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Stack | Cas Meter (SQRT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * » 1A311000AP
Teap | Te»p (dagF) | |
(degF) j in | out j (Velocity Mead Cue) dP(avg) • 0.075
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2 2011
. 2 2011
98 | 77
113 j 79
122 j 83
124
128
132
134
135
83
86
89
92!
94 !
0.2739 (Orifice Meter Reading ("us) dH(avg) « 2.000
0.2739 1
0.2739 (Stack Temperature (detj F) T(s ivg) • 2011.0
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
137 | 96 j 0.2739
137 j 97 j 0.2739
2 2011 | 137
2 2011
2 2011
2
2
2
2
2
2
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
137
135
139
135
130
131
131
131
(dejj C> T(s avg) « 1099.4

Meter Tcstwrature (deg F) TOa avg) * 111.6
(deg C> T(» avg) « 44.-2

Root-Mean-Square d> Cue) SORT(dP) • 0.274

98 I 0.2739 |
99 l| 0.2739
98 i
100 ;
101
100
100
101
101
i
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739








 TOTALS
              156
1.43 | 38.0000 |  38209.0 |  2466.0  |  1774.0 |  5.2034 j
                                                           310:
-------
 ISOK1NETIC RESULTS
 Plant:  1RF       Updated  11-12-91
 Date:   11-05-91  Printed  01/02/92
 Simple Location:  AFTERBURNER .

 PARAMETER

 Nozzle Diameter, Actual (in)
 Pi tot Tube Correction Factor
 Gas Meter Correction Factor
 Stack (Duct) Dimensions (in):
         Radius (if round)
         Length (if rectangular)
         Width (if rectangular)
 Area of Stuck (sq ft)

 # of Sample Points
 Total Sampling Time (min)
 Barometric Pressure (in Hg)
 Stack Pressure  (in H20)
 Gas Moter  Initial Reading  (cu ft)
 Gas Meter  Final  Reading (cu ft)
 Net Gas Sample  Volume  (cu  ft)

 Vol of Liquid Collected (ml)
 Vol of Liq 3 Std. Conds. (scf)
 Wt.  of  Filter Particulate  (gm)
 Wt.  of Probe Wash Particulate (gm)
•  Wt of Combined  Particulate (gm)

  02  Concentration (by CEM)
  C02 Concentration (by CEM)
  CO  Concentration (by CEM)
  N2  Concentration (by diff.)
Performed by:
Test No./Type:
Start/Stop Time:
         ED HILL
         1B051045AP
         1045-1328
                                                                           CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE # —  1B051045AP
                            I sold net i city
                            Hetered Sanpt* Gas Volume
 SYMBOL

N(d)
C(p)
(alpha)

R
L
W
ACS)
 VALUE
(calc.)
  0.586
   0.84
   0.99

  11.63
(2.95084
                            Stack Gas Flow, std cond.
                                            std cond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Particulate Loading,  dry    .
                                                a 7% 02(gr/dscf) C(s std)
                                                a 7X 02(mg/dscm) C
-------
ISOKINETIC RESULTS
Plant: IRF
Date: 11*05-91
Staple Location:

PARAMETER

Updated
Printed
11-12-91
01/02/92
AFTERIURNER

\




Nozzl* DlaMttr, Actual (In)
Pltot Tube Correction Factor
Ca* Hater Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) Dlaenalona (In):
Radius (If round)
length '(If rectangular)
Width (If
Area of stack (sq

rectangular)
ft)


Performed by:
Test Mo. /Type:
Start/Stop Time:

SYMBOL

N(d)
C(p)
(alpha)
It
L
U
Ar«t

VALUE
(calc.)
0.586
0.84
0.99
11.63
....
....
t? aciuu
ED HILL
C/<~
1805104SAP
1045-1328









\


\








• of SvspU Points
Total Sampling Tls» (siln)
laronetrlc Pressure (in Hg)
Stack Pressure (In H20)
Gaa Heter Initial
Reading
(cu ft)
*
19


(theta) ( 156.00 )
PCb)
P(atack)

Gas Heter Final Reading (cu ft)
Met Gas Staple Voluat (cu ft)
Vol of Liquid Collected (al)
Vol of Liq 8 Std.
Conds. (scf)
30.35
•0.05
963.837
1090.71








CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * — 1B051045AP

Isoklneticity x I • 101.8
Hetered Staple Gaa Voluae (scf) V<« std) » 117.04
(sea) V(a-std) > 3.314
Stack Gas Flow, atd cond. (dicfa) OCs) « 1162
atd cond. (d>ca/ain)Q(s) « 32.9
actual '(acfa) 0(a) • 5903
actual (ccm/ain) Q(a> * 167.2
Particulate Loading, dry (gr/dstcf) CCa atd) « 0.0217
8 7X O2(gr/dscf ) C(s std) • 0.0201
3 755 O2(m!/dsca) C(s atd) » 46
Particulate Emission Rats (Ifa/hr) i(p) « 0.216
(kg/hr) E(p)l • 0.098

Stack Gas Water Vapor Proportion 8(wo) • 0.083
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry H(d) •• 29.55
Wet M(s) « 28.59
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg) PCs) « 30.35
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec) VCs avg) >~ 33.3


V(a) ( 126.88 )
VI (c)
V(u std)
Ut. of Filter Particulat* (go)
Ut. of Probe Wash
Particulate Co*)
Ut of CcBbtntd Particulat* (ga)
02 Concentration
002 Concentration
CO Concentration
H2 Concentration
(by CEH)
(by CEH)
(by CEM)



(by dlff.)
Sample | dClock (velocity) Orifice
Point j Tin* (Head, dPJMeter.dH
j (Bin) |(in H20)j(in H20)
1 1
2 1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 6
1,2 12
3.4 12
5,6 12
7,8 12
9.10 12
11,12 12
11,10 12

0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
d w
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

HCp)
X
X
X
226.1
C 10.643
0.0538
0.111
C 0.1648
5.9
8.2
0









\


1
!

1








X ( 85.90 )
Stack
Temp
(degF)
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033
2033

Gas
Teop
in
132
135
134
133
134
132
133
133
133
134
134
134
134
135
135
134
135
135
137

Meter |SQRT(dP)
(degF)
oat
95
97
98
99
100
101
101
102
102
102
102
102
101
102
102
102
102
102
102



| 0.2739
' 0.2739
0.2739
! 0.2739
\ 0.2739
0.2739
l 0.2739
' 0.2739
' 0.2739
[ 0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
l 0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
j 0.2739 !
0.2739 |

FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * — 1B051W5AP

Velaeity Head (<*uc) dP(avg) » 0.075
Orifice Meter Reading (««c5 dH(avg) » 2.000

Stack Temperature (deg F) T(s avg) » 2033.0
(deg C) T(s avg) * 1111.7

Meter Tsapcratur* (deg F) T(a avg) • 117.4
(deg C) T(B avg) « 47.4

Root-Hean-Square dP (»uc) SORT(dP) * 0.274











TOTALS
             156
                     1.43 | 38.0000 | 38627.0 |  2546.0  | 1914.0  |  5.2034
                                                           312!
-------
ISOCiNETIC RESULTS
Plant:  IRF       Updated  11-12-91
Dates   11-06-91   Printed  01/02/92
Sample Location:   AFTERBURNER

PARAMETER         »

Nozzle Diaaetcr,  Aetu»l (In)
Pitot TOb* Correction Factor
Cat Meter Correction Factor
Stack (Duet) Dlawneiona (In):
        Radiua (if round)
        Length (if rectangular)
        Utdth (If rectangular)
Area of Stock (aq ft)

f of Sample Pointa'
Total Stapling Tia* (Bin)
laroiwtric Preuure (in Hg)
Stack Pressure (in 1120)
Gat Meter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Gat Meter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Cat Sasple Volune (cu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected (ail)
Vol of Llq 3 Std. Condt. (acf)
Ut. of Filter Paniculate (g>)
Ut. of Probe Wath Paniculate (gn)
Ut (if Combined Partieulate (gn)
                                   Performed by:      ED HILL CX*
                                   Test do./Type:     1B061100AP
                                   Start/Stop Tia»:   1100-1339

                                    SYMBOL    VALUE
                                             (calc.)
                                   N(d)        0.586
                                   C(p)         0.84
                                   (alpha)      0.99
                                                                          CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —  1B061100AP
                             Itokinetlcity
                            Ketered Staple Gas Voluae
                                   R
                                   L
                                   U
                                   A(a)

                                   *
                                   (thata)
                                   P(b>
                                   P(atack)
                                               11.63
                            Stack Gas Hen, atd cend.
                                            std cond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Particulate Loading,  dry
                                                8 7X 02(gr/dscf) CCs std) «
                                                a 7X 02(av/dsca>> C(s std) *
                            Particulate Emission Rata  (Ib/hr)   E(p)     •
                                                       (kg/hr)   E(p)     »
          X I      <
(scf)     W(» atd) <
(sot)     V(n std) '
(dscfai)   0(s>     '
(dscai/aiin)a(s)     <
(acta)    Q(a)     <
(acai/trin) Q(a)
(gr/dscf) C(s std)
              94.7
            11S.23
             3.263
              1230
              34.8
              5844
             165.5
            0.013S
            0.0126
                29
             0.142
             0.064
(2.9S084 )

      19
( 156.00 >
   30.22
   -0.05
  94.218
 217.243
( 123.03 )
                                    Vl(c)         30
                                    V(u std)  (   1.412  )
                                               0.0031
                                               0.0976
                                    M(p)     (  0.1007  }
Stack Cat Water Vapor Proportion
Molecular Weight of Stack Gaa. Dry
                               Uat
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Ng)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)
KM)
M(d>
M(s)
P(s)
V(s avg)
                       0.012
                       29.54
                       29.40
                       30.22
                        33.0
02 Concentration (by CEM) X 6
C02 Concentration (by CEM) X 8.1
CO Concentration (by CEM) X 0 '
N2 Concentration (by. dlff.) X ( 85.90)
Staple dClock (Velocity) Orifice | Sttck .
Point Tint (Heed, dPJMeter.dH j Tenp
(•in) j (in H20)|(in H20) j (degF)
1 6 | 0.075 2
2 6 j 0.075 2
3 6 j 0.075 2
4 6 j 0.075 2





10
11
12
1.2
3.4
5.6
7.8
9,10
6 | 0.075 2
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
12
12
12
12
11,12 | 12
11.10
12
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
2
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2 | 2042
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
Gas Meter |SQRT(dP) |
Tenp (degF)
in
72
90
107
112
118
122
125
128
130
130
131
131
2042 | 133
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
134
134
134
134
134
134
out
70
71
74
77
81
85
89
92
93
e*
95
96
96
97
98
98
1

0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
99 | 0.2739 |
99
0.2739 |
99 | 0.2739 !

                                                                           Orifice Meter Reading    ("uc>
                                                                           Stack Temperature
                                                                           Meter Tesperature
                                                                           Root-Hean-Square dP
                                                                                                  (deg F)
                                                                                                  (deg C)

                                                                                                  (deg F)
                                                                                                  (deg C>

                                                                                                  ("«c)
                                                                  1B061100AP

                                                                  dP(tvg)  «   0.075

                                                                  dM(avg)  «   2.000

                                                                  11* avg) «  2042.0
                                                                  Us avg) »  1116.7

                                                                  T(« avg) •   106.2
                                                                  TO avg) •    41.2
                                                                                                                SQRT(dP)
                                                                                                                             0.274
TOTALS
             156
                      1.43 | 38.0000 |  38798.0 |  2333.0  |  1703.0  |  5.2034
                                                              313
-------
ISOKIKETIC RESULTS
Ptanti  IRF       Updated  11-12-91
D»tt!   11-07-91  Printed  01/02/92
tuple Location:  AFTERSURNER

PARAMETER          v

Koixle DlaMtac. Actual  (In)
Pttot Tub* Correction Factor
CM Htttr Correction Factor
Itack (Duct) OlMnsions  
lit. ef Filter 'articulate Co»)
Ut. of Probe Hash Partlculatc COB)
Ut of Ceebl.ned Paniculate (gn)

02  Concentration (by CEM)
C02 Concentration (by CEM)
CO  Concentration (by CEM)
H2  Concentration (by diff.)
                                                                          CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —  1B071017AP
               Perforated by:      EO
               Test Ho./Type:     1B071017AP
               Start/Stop Time: '  1017-1257
Isokinetlcity
Metered Sanple Gas Voluns
STM80L

N(d)
C(p)
(alpha)
t
L
U
ACS)
0
(theta)
PCb)
P(stsck)


V(«)
VUc)
V(M std)


MCp)
s
S
~5t
X
VALUE
(calc.)
0.586
0.84
0.99
11.63
....
....
(2.95084 )
19
( 156.00 )
30.02
-0.05
219.359
333.802
( m.44 >
290
( 13.650 )
0.0338
0.0596
( 0.0934 )
6.1
8
0
( 85.90 >
                                                    Stack Gas Flow, std cond.
                                                                    ltd cond.
                                                                    actual
                                                                    actual
                                                    Paniculate Loading,  dry
                                                                        8 7% 02(gr/dscf) CCs std)
                                                                        a 7% 02(ng/dsc») C(s std)
                                                    Particulate Eaission Rate  (Ib/hr)   E(p)
                                                                               (kg/hr)   E(p)
          XI      <
(scf>     V(m std) >
(soa)     V(» std) '
Cctscfm)   OCs)    ••
Cdsoi/»in>acs>  '  >
(acfa)    0(a)
(aca/Bin) a(a)
(gr/dscf) CCs std)
  96.1
106.74
 3.022
  1122
  31.8
  5989
 U9.6
0.0135
0.0127
    29
 0.130
 0.059
                                                    Stack Gas Uater Vapor Proportion     Kuo)    «   0.113
                                                    Molecular Height of Stack Gas. Dry   N(d)     *   29.52
                                                                                   Wet   MCs)     «   28.22
                                                    Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)     PCs)     «   30.02
                                                    Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)      VCs avg) «    33.8
Sample dClock (Velocity) Orifice | Stack | Gas Meter jsdtT(dP)
Point Tim JKead. cPJMcter.dH j Temp j leap (degF) :
(•in) j(ln H20)|(In H2O) j (degF) j in | out
1 6
2 6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
1.2 j 12 j 0.075 .
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3.4 j 12 | 0.075 2
5.6
7.8
9.10
11.12
11,10
12
12
12
12
12
0.075 2
0.075 2
0.075 2
0.075 2
0.075 2
2046 | 83
2046 j 98
2046 j 106
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
113
117
121
126
126
127
70 0.2739
71 10.2739
74 0.2739
77
80
83
87
88
90
2046 | 126 | 92
2046
2046
2046
Z046
129
129
128
129
93
94
95
96
0.2739
[0.2739
10.2739
0.2739
0.2739
jO.2739
FIELD SATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE 8
Velocity Head ("we)
Orifice Heter Reading (*HC)

Stack Teaperature (deg F)
(dea C)

Meter Temperature (deg F)
(deg C)

Root-Mean-Squar* dP CM)
0.2739 |
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
2046 | 130 97 0.2739
2046
2046
2046
2046
131 98 0.2739
130 97 10.2739
130 96 0.2739
130 96 0.2739









                                                                                                               1S071017AP

                                                                                                               df>Cavg)  *   0..07S

                                                                                                               dH(avg)  «   2,,000

                                                                                                               T(s avg) «  2046.0
                                                                                                               T(s avg) «  1118.9

                                                                                                               T(a avg) «   104.9
                                                                                                               TCs avg) »    40.S

                                                                                                               SaRT(dP) *   Q.,274
 TOTALS
              156
1.43 | 38.0000 |  38874.0  | 2311.0  | 1674.0 f  5.2834
                                                              314
-------
ISOKINETIC XESULTS v
Pl*nt:  IRF       Updated  10-28-91  Performed by:      I Nichols
Data:   10-24-91  Printed  12/04/91  Tat Ko./Typti     1A241146EP
Sample Location:  Gcrubber Exit     Start/Stop Tle»:   1140-1307

PARAMETER
Nozzle Diameter,  Actual  (in)
•Hot Tuba Correction Factor
Cat Meter Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) DiMcnsiona  (In):
        Radius (If round)
        Length (If rectangular)
        Width (if rectangular)
Aria of Stack (aq ft)

* of Saople Points
Total Sacpllng Tlan (Bin)
Barometric Pressure (in  Kg)
Stack Pressure (In H20)
Gat Meter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Gas Hater Final Reading  (cu ft)
Net Gas Sanple Voluae (cu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected (•!>
Vol of Liq 9 Std. Conds. (*ef) .
ut. of Filter Paniculate (OB)
Wt. of Probe Uash Particulate (o»)
Ut of Contained Particulate (OB)
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —  1A241146EP
Uekinetlcity
Metored Saaple Gas Voluaa
SYMBOL

N(d)
C(p>
(alpha)
1
L
U
A(S)
0
(theta)
P(b)
P(atack)


V(B>
VUc)
V(u atd)


M(p)
VALUE
(calc.)
0.376
0.84
1
7
....
....
(1.06901 )
16
( 84.00 )
29.85
•S
796.975
857.3
( 60.32 )
266.76
( 12.556 )
. 0.3265
0.0069
( 0.3334 )
Stack Gas Flou, atd cond.
                std cond.
                actual
                actual
Particulate Loading,  dry
                    a n 02(gr/dtef) C(s std)
                    8 7X 02(ag/dsca) C(s std) >
Particulate Eaiiaslon Rate  (Ib/hr)   E(p>     '
                           (kg/hr)   E(p)     <
          X I      '
(sef)     V(B std) i
(sea)     V(B std) i
(dsefa)   0(s)
(dsca/ain)Q(s>
(acfa)    Q(a)
(aca/atn) Q(a)
(gr/dscf) C(s std)
  91.9
 54.88
 1.554
   986
  27.9
  1398
  39.6
0.0937
0.1161
   266
 0.792
 0.3S9
Stack Gas Hater Vapor Proportion     KMO) .   «  0.186
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas. Dry   N(d>     •  29.46
                               Wet   N(a>     •  27.33
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Kg)     P(s)     •  29.48
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)      V(s avg) «   21.8
02 Concentration (by CEM) X 9.7
CM Concentration (by CEM) X 6.7
CO Concentration (by CEM) X 0
N2 Concentration (by diff.) X ( 83.60 )
Sanple
Point

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
....

TOTALS
dClock
Tine
(Bin)
7
7
S
5
5
5
5
5
S
5
5
S
5
S
S
5



Velocity] Orifice Stack | Gas Meter |SORT(dP)
Head, dPJMetcr.dH Teap j Teep (degF)
(in H20)j(in H20) (degF) j in | out
0.12 | 1.5 140
0.12 j 1.5 140
0.12
0.11
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.13
0.13
0.14
0.14
0.12



1.5 140
1.3 140
1.3
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.5



84 | 1.98 | 25.7500
140
96
110
118
125
129
140 ) 134
140 j 136
140 j 139
140
140
140
140
140
140
140"
140



133
136
137
86
91
96
103
105
112
114
117
115
116


0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3317
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3606
0.3464
116 0.3464
138 j 120 0.3606
139
141
141
141


121 0.3606
1Z3 0.3742
124 0.3742
124 0.3464



2240.0 | 2093.0 | 1783.0 | 5.6258
                                                                          FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * --  1A241146EP

                                                                          Velocity Head            (»HC)       dP(avg)  *   0.124
                                                                          Orifice Meter Reading

                                                                          Stack Temperature


                                                                          Meter Teaperature


                                                                          Root-Mean-Square dP
                         (deg F)
                         (deg C)

                         (deg F)
                         (deg C)
          dH(avg)  «

          T(s avg) «
          T(a avg) *
 1.609

 140.0
  60.0
          T(B avg) »   121.1
          T(« avg) «  .  49.5
                                     SORT(dP)
                                                  0.352
                                                            315   .
-------
ICOCINETIC RESULTS
Plant:  IRF       UpkUMd  10-28-91  Perforaed by:      J Rudd
Data:   10-29-91  Printed  12/04/91  Test Mo./Typa:     1A2911S5EP
Saaple Location:  Scrubber Exit      Start/Stop Tint:   1200-1327
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE *	  1A2911SSEP
                                                                         Isoklnstlcity
                                                                         Metered Saaple CM Volute
PARAMETER

Koult Diameter, Actual (In)
Pttat Tub* Corr*ctfon Factor
Cat H*t*r Corroction Factor
Stack (Duct) Dtaanalena (In):   ,
        Radlua «f round)
        Length (If ractangutar)
        Width (If ractangular)
Area ef Stack; (»q ft)

t ef Saaple Points
Total Sampling Time (Bin)
laromatric Pressure (In Mg)
Stack Pressure (In H20)
Ue Katar Initial Raedlm (cu ft)
tea Hatar Final Reading (cu ft)
Hat Caa Sa*p|a Voluat (cu ft)

Vat ef Liquid Collected (ail)
Vol ef Llq a Std. Ccnda. (acf)
Ut. of Flltar Paniculate (gB)
Ut. ef Probe Utth Partlculata (gm)
Ut of Cabined Parttculete (gB)
                                     SYMBOL    VALUE
                                              (cale.)
                                    H(d>        0376
                                    C(p>         0.84
                                    (alpha)        1
                                    *
                                    L
                                    II
                                    A(a)
(1.04901  )
                                    «              16
                                    (theta)  (  80.00 )
                                    •(b>        29.85
                                    P(stack)       -5
                                              888.224
                                              944.867
                                    V(es)     (  56.64 )

                                    Vl(c)      243.02
                                    V(u std) ( 11.439 )
                                               0.2663
                                               0.0036
                                    M(p)     ( 0.2699 )
                            Stack 6aa Flow,  atd cood.
                                            »td eond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Partlculate Loading, dry
                                                a 7X 02(gr/dscf) C(s std) *
                                                a n 02(Bg/dsca) C(a std) «
                            Partlculate Emission Rete   (Ib/hr)   E(p>     »
                                                       (kg/hr)   E     «
(gr/dcef) C(a atd) •=
  92.1
 S2.9Z
 1.«98
   '996
  23.2
  IMS
  97.3
9.978?
8.885*
   195
 0.672
 O.:!05
                            Stack Gas Water vapor Proportion    l(uo)  .  »   0.178
                            Molecular Weight of Stack Cas, Dry  «Cd>     «   29.59
                                                          Uet  H(s)     •   27.53
                            Stack Pressure, absolute (in H03    P(s)     •   29.48
                            Average Stack Velocity  (ft/sec)      V(s avg) «    21.6
02 Concentration (by CEH) S 8.1
C02 Concentration (by CEH) X 7.9
CO Concentration (by CEH) % 0 .
K2 Concentration (by diff.) S ( 84.00 > ;
Staple | dClock (Velocity) Orifice | Stack | Gas Hater (SORT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * -
Point j Time (Head, dPJMeter.dH j Tamp j Teap (dagF) j |
j (Bin) j(in H20)j(in H20) j (degF) j In | out j
1
2
• 3
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
6 j 5 j 0.12
7 j 5 | 0.13
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8



5 | 0.13
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5



0.12
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.12-
0.12
.5
.5
.5
.5
138
139
140
140
.5 | 137
.5
.6
.6
.5
.5
136
135
136
134
135
.6 | 135
.6
.6
.5
.5
0.12 j 1.5


	
135
134
134
134
88
96
111
112
117
119
121
123
96
116
121
122
124
126
127
134 | 127
	


34
34
36
88
92
94
96
98
98
98
100
101
103
103
105
0.3464
6.3464
0.3464
6.3464
6.3464
0.3464
6.3606
6.3606
6.3464
6.3606
6.3606
Velocity Head ("we)
Orifice Meter Reading <«MC>

Stack Temperature (deg F)
(dee C)

Hater Temperature (dee F)
(dee C)

Roat-Hean-Square * ("tie)


0.3606
6.3606
0.3464
0.3464
106 | 0.3464



.«.



                                                                                                               1A291155EP
                                                                                                              dP(avg)

                                                                                                              dH(avg)

                                                                                                              TCs avg)
                                                                                                              T(s avg)
                                                                                                                           0.124

                                                                                                                           1.S31

                                                                                                                           1316.0
                                                                                                                            37.8
                                                                                                             •  T(a avg) «    1(15.0
                                                                                                               T(B evg) •    «1.0
                                                                                                               SSRT(dp)
                                                                                                                           0..3S2
TOTALS
               80 f    1.98 I  24.5000 |  2176.0 | 1848.0 | 1536.0  |  5.6274
                                                              316
-------
ISCKIMETIC RESULTS
Plant:  IRF
Date:   10-31-91
      i Location:
Updated  10-28-91
Printad  12/08/91
scrubber Exit
PARAM-TER
Noxzlo DlaMter,  Actual  (In)
Pltet Tube Correction factor
Caa Noter Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) Dioenalena  (In):
        Kadlua (if reund)
        Length (If rectangular)
        Uidth (if rectangular)
Area of Stack (aq ft)

* of Saapla Polnta
Total SanpUng Tla» (Bin)
Saraentric Preasure (in  Kg)
Stack Preaaure (in H20)
Gaa Muter Initial Reading  (cu ft)
Gaa Moter Final Reading  )
Ut of Coetolned Particulate (gia)
Perfonatd by:      J Rudd Cf~
Teat Ho./Type:     1A311000€P
Start/Stop Tiw:   1000-1125

 SYMBOL    VALUE
          (calc.)
N(d>        0.376
C(p)         0.8*
(alpha)         1
                   R
                   L
                   U
                   A(a>
                                                                          CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —  1A311000EP
laoklnatlcity
Netered Seattle CM voluae
                            (1.06901  )
Stack Gaa Flow, atd cond.
                •td cond.
                actual
                actual
Particulate Loading,  dry
                    a 7X 02(gr/dacf)  C(a atd)
                    a 7X 02(Mg/daoO  C(a atd)
Particulate Eaiaalon Rate   (Ib/hr)    E(p)
                           (kg/hr)    E(p)
          X I
(acf)     V(« atd)
(aoa)     V(a> atd)
(diefa)   OC*>
(d*c*/Min)Q(s)     >
(acta)    0(a)     i
(aca/aiin) Q(a)
(gr/dacf> C(a atd) <
  90.4
 44.71
 1.266
   8S7
  24.3
  1122
  31.8
0.0176
0.0192
    44
 0.129
 0.059
                   *              16
                   (theta)  (  80.00 )
                   P(b)        29.85
                   P(atack)       -5
                             946.991
                               993.8
                   V(a»     (  46.81 )

                   Vl(c)      129.96
                   V(u atd) (  6.117 )
                              0.0456
                              0.0053
                   M(p>     ( 0.0509 )
                                     •Stack Caa Uater Vapor Proportion    l(uo)  •  •   0.120
                                     Molecular Weight of Stack Gaa, Dry  M(d)     «   29.59
                                                                   Wet  M(a)     »   28.20
                                     Stack Preaaure, absolute (In Kg)    P(a)     •   29.48
                                     Average Stack Velocity (ft/aee)      V(a avg) »    17.5
02 Concentration (by CEM) X 8.2
C02 Concentration (by CEM) X 7.9
CO Concentration (by CEM) X 0
N2 Concentration (by diff.) X ( 83.90 ]
SwpUi | dClock |Velocity| Orifice | Stack Gaa
Point: j Tine JMead, dPJNeter.dH j T««p Teap
j («ln) j (in N20)j(ln HZO) j (degF) in
, 11
i!
3.
5
S
5
« 1 s
!tJ
0
7
«
1
a
S
S
5
5
S
S
!t | 5
l,\ 5
U
A
' V
tt



S
5
5
5




0.08
0.07
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.08




1
0.88
0.88
1
1
1
1.13
1.13
1
1
1.13
1.13
1.13
1.13
1
136 72
140 86
139
138
138
139
70
78
103
105
139 107
140 110
140 . 100
140 106
139 110
140 111
140
140
138
1 j 137

	 I""


TOTAUE | 80 | 1.32 | 16.5400 | 2223.0
112
113
113
114





^
,
Meter |SORT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * -- 1A311000EP
(degF)
out
72 0.2828
72 0.2646
73 0.2646
76 0.2828
79
82
85
87
87
89
90
91
92
93
93
94

....

	
1610.0
1355.0
0.2828

Velocity Head (tic) dP(avg) • 0.083
Orifice Meter Reading ("uc) dH(avg) • 1.034

Stack Teaperature (deg F) T(a avg) « 138.9
(deg C) T(» avg) » 59.4

0.2828 (Meter Taaperature (dag F) T<« avg) • 92.7
0.3000
0.3000
0.2828
0.2828
0.3000
0.3000
0.3000
0.3000
0.2828
0.2828




4.5919
(deg C) T(a> avg) - 33.7
f
Root-Mean-Square df> ("HC) SQRT(dP) « 0.287










                                                              317
-------
ISCKIKETIC RESULTS




CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * — 1805105ZEF
Plant: IRF Updated 11-11-91 Performed by: J RUM *-*
Date: 11-05-91 Printed 12/04/91 TMt llo./Type: 1SOS1052EP
Saaple Location: SCRUIIER EXIT Start/Stop TIM: . 1052-1217
PARAMETER

Kozzle Di
SYMBOL VALUE
(calc.)
enter. Actual (in)
H(d)
Pltat Tube correction Factor C(p>
CM Mater Correction Factor (alpha)
Stack (Duct) Dlaanalona (In):
Radlua (If 'round) \ \ R
Length (If rectangular) L
Width (if rectangular) U
Area of Stack (aq ft)
* of Saapla Point*
Total Saaplim Tla» («ln)
laroaetric Pressure (in Kg)
Stack Pressure (in ICO)
0.376
0.84
1
7
A(a) (1.06901 )
*
(thata) (
P(b)
P(stack)
CM Meter Initial Reading (cu ft)
CM Meter Final Reading (cu
Kit CM Sample Voli
ft)

ja* (cu ft) V(e» (
Vol of Liquid Collected (•!) Vl(c)
Vol of Liq 3 Std. Condi, (acf ) V(u atd) (
Ut. of Filter Partleulat* (gn>
Ut. of Probe With Perticulate Com)
ut of cotfctned Particulata (g» M(p) (
02 Concentration
C02 Concentration
CO Concentration
M2 Concentration
(by GEM)
(by CEN)
(by CEH)
(by diff.
Saapl* | dClosk |V*loclty|
Point I
1
1
2
3

5

7
g
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
a
»•••


TOTALS
X


'
Orifice |
Tl»t (Head. *|M*ter.dH |
(•in) j(ln H20)j(1n H20) |
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
S
S
5
5
5
5
5



1 «0
0.1 |
0.1 I
w. « |
0.11 1
0.11
0.11 I
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.11
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.09



| 1.63
1.45
1.45
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.45
1.31
• 1.4S
1.45
1.45
1.6
1.45
1.45
1.45
1.31



[ 23.6700
X
X
X (
Stack |
(d^ !
140
140
141
141
140
• 141
140
139
140
140
141
141
140
141
140
139



| 2244.0
16
00.00 )
30.35
-5
10.468
64.435
53.97 >
218
10.261 )
0.0244
0.0051
0.029S }
8.1
7.5
0
84.40 )
Isokineticlty XI- OT.1
Metwed Saapl* CM Voluas (scf ) V(» atd) • 51 .40
(sea) V(« atd) > 1.458
Stack CM Flow, atd eond. (dicta) O.(a) • 920
atd eond. (dsa/eiin)Q(s) - 3!6.0
actual (acfa) 0(a) • 1251
actual (oen/ain) 9(a> • 215.4
; Pareteulate Loading, dry (gr/daef ) C(a atd) • 0.0088
S 7X 02(8r/dacf) C(8 atd) • 0.009ft
9 7£ 02(i«/dacB) C(a atd) « 22
Partleulat* EaUaion Rat* (Ib/hr) E(p) « 0..070
(kg/hr) E(p) • 0.032
Stack CM Water Vapor Proportion t(«o) . • 0.166
Molecular Weight of Stack CM, Dry M(d> " 29.52
Wet «(«) » 27.61
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg> PCs) « 29.93
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sue) VCs avg) « 19.5










't *•
\
CM Meter |SORT(dP) |
Teap
in |
7* i
93
101
110
116
119
123
125
107
118
122
126
126
127
127
128



[ 1842.0
1 <£ |
73
74
7T
79
84
87
92
93
97
0.3162
0.3162
! 0.3317
FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * " 1I03105ZEP
Velocity Head ("«c) dP(avg) « 0.102
Orifice Meter Reading ("we) dH(avg) » 11.479

Stack Teapereture (deg F) T(s avg) « H40.3
0.3317 j (deg C) T(s avg) • 60.1
0.3317
0.3317
0.3162
: 0.3000
0.3162
97 j O.S162
99
100
101
101
103
104


0.3162
0.3317
0.3162
0.3162
i 0.3162
', 0.3000


i
14S1.0 | 5.1044

Meter Teaperature (deg f) T<« avg) « 103.2
(deg C) T
-------
ISIXINETIC RESULTS
Plant:  IRF  •    updated  11-11-91
Bate:   11-06-91
               CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —  1I0610SSEP
vm^mz t i-uo-yi
Sample Location:
PAIlAKETEi
rnmea i£/0*/91
SCRUBBER EXIT


Noiizle OlaMter. Actual (in)
Pitot Tuba Correction Factor
Gau Meter Correction Factor
Stuck (Duct) Oieanaiona (In):
Radius (if -round)
Length (If rectangular)
Width (If rectangular)
Area of Stack (aq ft)
• erf Saaple Pointa
Total Sanpling Tin (>in)
laranetric Presaunt (in Kg)
Stick Preaaure (in H20)
Gaa Meter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Teat Ne./Type:
Start/Stop Tina:
SYMBOL
M(d)
C(p)
(alpha)
t
L
U
A(a)
*
(theta)
P(b)
P(atack)
Ga* Heter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Gaa Saaple Voluw (cu
ft)
Vol of Liquid Collected (ail)
Vol of Liq 8 Std.
Conda. (acf)
Ut. of Filter Particulate
(90)
V(M)
Vl(c>
V(u atd)

Ut. of Probe With Partieulate (gai)
Ut of Coobined Partieulate (go»
02- Concentration (by CEM)
C02 Concentration (by CEH)
CO Concentration
N2 Concentration
Smile otlock
Point Tie»
(•in)
1 S
2 5
3 5
4 5
S S
6 S
7 S
8 5
1 5
2 5
3 5
4 S
S 5
6 5
7 5
8 5



TOTALS 80
(by CEH)
(by diff

«>
[Velocity) Orifice
[Head. dPJHeter.dH
|(in H20)j(in H20)
0.1
0.1
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.1
0.1
0.11
0.11
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.1
0.1



1.71
1.45
1.45
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.45
1.45
1.6
1.6
1.74
1.6
1.6
1.45
1.45



24.8400
N(p)
X
X
X
X
Stack
Taep
(degF)
139
140
140
141
140
140
139
140
138
140
uo
141
141
140
140
139



2238.0 |
VALUE
(calc.)
0.376
0.84
1
' 7
(1.06901
16
( 80.00
30.22
-5
75.26
130.012
( 54.75
240
( 11.297
0.0223
0.012
( 0.0343
8.3
7.4
0
( 84.30
| Gaa
1 Taap
1 «"
1 70
1 83
I «
| 104
109
115
118
121
96
115
121
124
127
126
128
129



1780.0 |
1M6105SEP laoklnettclty x I « 97.7
1055-1219 Metered Saaple Gaa Voluw (acf) V(a atd) « 52.38


'

)

j


>



1
Meter
(degF)
| out
I 70
| 69

74
78
83
85
88
91
93
96
97
99
100
101
103



1398.0 |
(ae» V(ai atd) > 1.483
Stack Gaa FloM, atd cond. (dacfa) CJ(a) » 930
atd Good. .(dacn/Min)Q(a) « 26.3
actual (acfa) Q(a> * 1287
actual (an/Bin) a(a> * 36.5
Partieulate Loading, dry (gr/dacf ) C(a atd) « 0.0101
8 7X 02(gr/dacf ) C(e atd) » 0.0111
8 n\02(«Q/die»> C(a atd) « 25
Partieulate Earfaaion Rat* (Ib/hr) E(p) "« 0.081
 • 29.52
Wet N(a> « 27.47
Stack Preaaure. absolute (in Kg) p(a) « 29.85
Average Stack Velocity (ft/aec) V(a avg) . 20.1
\










|SORT(dP)
1
0.3162
0.3162
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3162
0.3162
0.3317
0.3317
0.3464
0.3317
0.3317
0.3162
0.3162



5.2287
FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * " 1I06105SEP
Velocity Head (««e) dP(avg) « 0.107
Orifice Meter Reading ("He) dH(avg) « 1.553

Stack Taaperature (deg F) T(a avg) - 139.9
(deg C) : T(a avg) • 59.9
Meter Taaperature (deg F) T(« avg) « 99.3
(deg C) T(B avg) « 37.4

Root-Haan-Square dp {•«:) SQRT(dP) « 0.327








319
-------
ISOKtNETIC RESULTS
Hint:  1RF      \Jpdated  11-11-91
Date:   11-07-91  Printed  12/04/91
Saapla location:  SCRUWER EXIT

PAtAXETER

Moult Dlaatftor,  Actual (In)
rltot Tifct Correction Factor
CM Meter Corrtetlon Factor
Stack (Duct) Diaanatona (ln)t
        Radtut (If round)
        Length (If rectangular)
        Width (if rectangular)
Art* of Stack (sq ft)

f of Saapla Points
Total Saaplfng Tta* («ln)
Itraeetric Prtisura (In Kg)
Stack rrtssur* (In K20)
Cat Meter Initlcl Reading (eu ft)
Cat Mater Final leading (cu fl)
Mat Cas Saapla VoluM (cu ft)

Vet  of Liquid Collccttd («l)
Vol  of Llq & Std. Conds. (ccf)
Ut.  of Filter Particulata (ga)
Ut.  of Probe Uath Paniculate  (ga)
Ut of Combined ParticuUt* (g>)
                                                                         CALCULATEO RESULTS FOR SAM>LE f —  1I071006EP
Perfonaed by:      J RUM
Tast No./Typt>:     1I071006EP
Start/Stop Tlae:   1006-1133

 SYMSOt    VALUE
          (eale.)
N(d)      •  0.376
C(p)         0.84
(alpha)         1
K
L
U
A(s)
                            laokinetieity
                            Netered Saaple 6aa Volute
                            Stack Gaa Flow,  atd cond.
                                            std eond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Particulata Loading,  dry
                            .  '• (>                8 72 02(gr/dacf) C(s atd) «
                               "y               an 02(ng/dacs» C(a atd) «
                            Particulata Eerfaaion Rata  (Ib/hr)   E(p)     «
                                                       (kg/hr)   E(p)     •
          X I
C«cf)     V(« atd)
(oca)     V(« atd)
(daefai)   e(s)
{dae«/«inJO(»)
(acfa)    «(a>
(aon/asin) Q(a)
(gr/dacf) C(a std)
                                                  99.1
                                                 521.51
                                                 1,513
                                                   936
                                                  !!6.3
                                                  H303
                                                  :vr.o
                                                0.1(051
                                                0.0050
                                                    11
                                                 0.041
                                                 0.019
*
(thata)
Mb)
P(atack)
 V(aO
(1.06901 )

      16
(  80.00 )
   30.02
      -S
 U5.571
 201.466
(  55.90 )
Stack Gas Uatar Vapor Proportion     Kuo).
Molecular Weight  of Stack Gaa. Dry   H(d)
                              Mat   M(a)
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Ho)     PCs)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/aec)      V(a avg)
                       27.3B
                        20.4
 Vl(c)         250
 V(u atd) ( 11.768 )
            0.01S5
            0.0023
 H(p)     ( 0.0178 >
02 Concentration (by CEH) X 6.6
C02 Concentration (by COO X 7.4
CO Concentration (by CEM) X 0
HZ Concentration (by dlff.) X ( 86.00 )
Sanple dCloek |Velecity| Orifice | Stack | Gas Mator jSORT(dP) JFIELO OATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * - U071006EP
Point Tin* |Heed. dPJMeter.dH j T«»p j Teap
(•In) j(ln H20)j(ln H203 j (dcgF) | in
1 S 0.11
2 5 0.11
3 5 0.12
4 5 0.12
5

7
g
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
.8
*•>*•
5 0.11
5
5

5
5
5
5
S
5
5
5

	 1— -
.... |
TOTALS | 80
0.11
0.11
0.1
0.1
0.11
0.11
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.1
1.6
1.6
1.74
1.74
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.45
1.45
1.6
1.6
1.74
1.6
1.6
1.45
0.1 j 1.45
	


138
138
139
139
140
140
141
139
138
140
140
140
141
140
139
139

70
83
94
(deoF) | |
out j (Velocity Head (°uc) dP(avg) « 0.109
68 | 0.3317
69 j 0.3317
70 I 0.3464
103 I 73
110
112
116
117
87
108
114
116
118
119
120
121



77
80
84
87
87
88
90
91
93
94
95
96

; 0.3464
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
6.3162
0.3162
! 0.3317
i 0.3317
0.3464
0.3317
0.3317
0.3162
0.3162

.... ....

1.75 | 25.4200 | 2231.0 | 1708.0 | 1342.0 | 5.2891
Orifice Meter Reading (-ue) dH(avg) « 11.589

Stack Teaperatura (deg F) T(a avg) « '139.4
(d*g C> T(a avg) « 59.7

Metar Temperature (deg F) TO avg) • 95.3
(deg C) TO avg) • 35.2

Root-Mean-Square dP ("nc9 SORT(dP) « 0.331








•
                                                             320
-------
ISOKINETIC RESULTS
Plant:  IRF       Updated 11-11-91
Dattt:   10-22-91   Printed 12/04/91
Sacple Location:   STACK

PARAMETER

Mozule Diawter,  Actual (in)
Pitnt Tube Correction Factor
Gas Heter Correction Factor
Stack (Duet) Oiaensions (in):
        Radius (If'round)
        Length (if rectangular)
        Uidth (if rectangular)
Arm of Stack (sq ft)

t of Saaple Points
Total Ssapllng Tia» (Bin)
laraettrie Pressure (in Hg)
Stack Pressure (in H20)
Gas Heter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Gas Meter Final Reeding (eu ft)
Net Gas Saaple Volune (cu ft)

Vel of Liquid Collected <»O
Vol of Llq 8 Std. Condi, (scf)
ut. of Filter Particulate 
Ut. of Probe Wash Particulate (ga)
Ut of Combined Particulate (ga)
Performed by:
Teat No./Type:
Start/Stop TiMt

 SYMBOL    VALUE
          (calc.)
M(d)        0.384
C(p)         0.84
(alpha)      0.99
R NICHOLS £/C.
1A221150SP
1150-1310
                                     CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE f —  1A2211SOSP
                                     Icokineticlty
                                     Netered Staple Gas Volt
U
A(s)

*
(thata)
P(b)
P(staek)
                                     Stack Gas Flow, std cond.
                                                     atd cond*
                                                     actual
                                                     actual
                                     Particulate loading,  dry
                                                         8 7X 02(gr/dscf) C(s std)
                                                         an 02(av/d*CB) C(s std)
                                     Portlculate Balsaion Rate  (Ib/hr)   E(p)
                                                                (kg/hr)   E(p)
                                                                          X I      '
                                                                (scf)     V(ai std) <
                                                                (scsO     V(« std) '
                                                                (dscfn)   0(t)
                                                                0(s)
                                                                (aefe)    «{a)
                                                                (aea/aiin) OCa)     >
                                                                (gr/dtcf) C(s std) '
                                                                              101.0
                                                                              57.45
                                                                              1.627
                                                                               1015
                                                                               28.8
                                                                               1384
                                                                               39.2
                                                                             0.0316
                                                                             0.0481
                                                                                110
                                                                              0.275
                                                                              0.125
V(*»
(1.06901 )

      12
   74.50 )
   30.03
       1
   161.5
   222.9
   61.40 )
                                     Stack Gas Water Vapor Proportion     l(wo).    «   0,164
                                     Molecular "eight of Stack Gaa. Dry   M(d)     •   29.50
                                                                    Wet   N(s)     •   27.61
                                     Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)     P(s)     «   30.10
                                     Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)      V(s avg) »    21.6
         (
VUc)         240
VCu std) ( 11.297 )
           0.1178
                0
H(p)     ( 0.1178 }
02 Concentration (by CEH) X 11.79
C02 Concentration (by CEH) X 6.42
CO Concentration (by CEH) X 0



N2 Concentration (by diff.) . X ( 81.79 )
Saiple dClock (Velocity) Orifice j Stack | Gas
Point Tlae jlleed, dPJMeter.dH j Teap j Teap
(•in) j(in H20)|(in H20) j (degF) j In
1 7
2 7
. 3 8
4 7.5
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6


..»•
7.5
7.5
7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.15
0.14
0.14
2 j 0.15
7
11
3
0






	
0.15
0.12
0.1
0.1







1.75 | 138
1.75 j 139
1.75 j 140
2.62
2.62
2.4
2.4
2.62
2.62
2.1
1.75
140
142
143
143
144
153
152
153
1.75 | 152














93
97
104
108
110
113
113
115
115
116
115
115







TOWS | 74.5 | 1.50 | 26.1300 | 1739.0 | 1314.0
Meter |SQRT(dP)
(degF)
out
84 0.3162
86 0.3162
FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * — 1A221150SP

Velocity Mead Cue) dP(avg) - 0.125
Orifice Meter Reading ("MC) dH(avg) • 2.178

90 0.3162 (Stack Teaperature (dog F) T(s avg) • 144.9
93 0.3873
97
99
101
103
103
104
105
105







1170.0
0.3873
0.3742
0.37*2
0.3873
0.3873
0.3464
0.3162
0.3162







(deg C) T(a avg) - 62.7

Meter Teaparatura (deg F) • T(B avg) • 103.5
(deg C) TO avg) « 39.7

Root-Mean-Square dP C"«c) SQRT(dP) - 0.352





4.2251
                         321
-------
          VALUE
          (cale.)
•(d)        0.38*
C(p>         O.K
(olpha)        1
L
U
1SCKIKETIC MOATS
Plants  »r      Updated  10-28-91  Parferaed by:      8 tHchoU
0*te:   10-24-91  Printed  12/04/91  Toot Ko./Type:     1A241140SP
Saaple location:  Stack              Start/Stop Tlae:   1140-1307
PAftUCTEX

•rale OloMter, Actual  (In)
Pltet Tube Correction rector
CM Meter Correction rector
Stack (Duct) Olaemlom  (In):
        ladlua'df round)
        Length (If rectangular)
        Width (If rectangular)
Area of Stack (cq ft)

< of Saaple Point!
Total SaapUng Tlae 
Ut. of Filter Partleutate  (aa)
Ut. ef Probe With Partieulate (en)
Ut ef Coatoined Partlculato (gei)

02 Concentration (by CEN)
C02 Ceneentratlen (by CEN)
CO Concentration (by CEN)
O. Concentration (by dlff.)
                                    CALCULATED USULTS RK SAMPLE * —  1A241140SP
Icoklnatlclty
Motored'Saaple fiaa Voluae  (acf)
Stock CM Men. »td eand.   (dKfa)
                «td eond.
                actual     (aefn)
                actual
Pop«!eulo«e Lood!n§0  dry  (fir/thef)
                '    a n, 02(tr/tiuf >
                    • ?X 02(*3/clKOs)
Partleula«e EalMien Rate  (la/hr)
                           (kf/hr)
                                                                        X I
                                                                        V(a otd)
                                                                        V(> ltd)
                                                                        0(1)
e(a)
6(0)
e« atd)
G(a otd)
6(a atd)
C(p>
C(p)
A(a> (1.06901 )
(theto) (
Kb)
P(otaefc)
12
73700 )
29.85
                                     Stock Bo* Motor Vapor •ropartlon     O(MO) .
                                     Holoculor uoloht of Stock CM, Cry   ll(d)
                                                                   tut   IKo)
                                     Stack •raoiuro. abcotuto (In «§!»     P(o)
                                     Avorogi Stack Voloclty (ft/oee)      V(o avi)
                                                                           102.0
                                                                           S4.75
                                                                           1.607
                                                                             <48
                                                                            a.9
                                                                            1300
                                                                            3&.B
                                                                          B.H26
                                                                          0.69112
                                                                             m
                                                                           O.JA5
                                                                           0.1120

                                                                           0.1174
                                                                           ZO.,46
                                                                           27..W
                                                                           29.92
                                                                            20.3
          22S.S15
          285.745
         (  60.23 )
Vl(e)      254.72
V(w etd) ( 11.990 )
           0.1055
           0.0143
         ( 0.1198 )
M(p)

X
X
X
X
    12.1
     6.1
       0
(  81.80  )
SMpl* | dClock [Vtlocltyl Orlflc* | Stack | 6ao Itotor JSO«T(»>
Point | Tim |N*ad. dP|Kator.dH j Tavp j T«^> (dtsFJ | i
| (aln) j(1n H20)|(ln K20) j (dr|» | in | out | !
1 I ^
2 |
J |
* |
5
i
1
2
S
«
7
7
7
7
r
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.
0.
0.
7 f 0.
7
7
S
5 1 S
6




	

S
0.
0.13
.75
.75
.75
.75
.75
139
139
135
136
137
90 | 86
97 | 88
102
105
108
.75 | 137 | 110
.75
1.75
2.2.
0.13 | 2.2
0.13
0.13
1- —





	


	

2.2
2.2




	

.13?
13*
139
139
139
139




	

91
94
97
98
106 | 99
109
111
111
112
112




	

TOTALS | 78 | 1.32 | 22.8000 | 1632.0 | 1275.0
iel
t01
ies
IGi
103


—
—
1163.0
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
10.3162
0.3162
0.3606
0.3606
O.S604
;O.S606
1
1
!
....
| JS.9720
                                                                         FIELD SATA AVERAGES FOt SAMPLE * "  1A241140SP

                                                                         Velocity Mead            ("HC)       drteveJ  "   0.110

                                                                         Oriflee Meter Reeding    ("wc>       dH(evg»  •   1.900

                                                                         Stock Teaperature
                                                              (dot r)
                                                              (daeC)
                                                                T(o avf)  •  137.7
                                                                T(l avf)  •   S8.7

                                                                TO ave)  •  10)1.5
                                                                T(n avf)  «   38.6
                                                                         Meter Teaperature        (dag F)


                                                                         Root-Mean-Souer* ef>      ("Me)      SalT(dP) >
                                                                                      C.331
                         322
-------
ISOKINETIC RESULTS
Plant:  IRF       Updated  12-04-91
Date:   10-29-91  Printed  12/04/91
Saaple Location:  STACK

PARAMETER

Nozzle Olaieter, Actual (in)
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Gas Meter Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) DtsMnston* (In):
        Radius (.if -round)
        length (If rectangular)
        Width (if roetangular)
Area of Stack (sq f «)

f of Staple Points
Total Stapling Tiat (ain)
lareMtric Pressure (in Hg)
•Stack Pressure (in 1)20)
Gas Meter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Gts Meter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Gts Saaple Volune (eu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected (al)
Vol of Liq a Std. Conds. (sef)
Ut. of Filter Partieulate (ga)
Ut. of Probe Wtth Partieulate (ga)
Ut of Combined Partieulate (ga)

02  Concentration (by CEM)
C02 Concentration (by CEM)
CO  Concentration (by CEM)
N2  Concentration (by diff.)
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —  1A291155SP
                                    Perforaed by:      J MOD
                                    Teat Mo./Type:     1A291155SP
                                    Start/Stop Tlat:   1155-1327
                           Isokinetieity
                           Hetered Staple Cat Volute
                                     SYMBOL

                                    N(d>
                                    C(p)
                                    (alpha)

                                    I
                                    L
                                    u
                                    A(s)
 VALUE
(ctlc.)
  0.384
   0.84
   0.99
                                             (1.06901  )
Stack Gas Floy, std eond.
                std eond.
                actual
                actual
PartleulaM Loading,  dry
                    a 75£ 02(gr/dsef) CCt std)
                    9 78 02(ag/dsca) C(s std)
Partieulate Eaiisslon Rate  (tb/hr)   E(p)
                           (kg/hr)   E(p)
                                    *              12
                                    (theta)  (  84.00 )
                                    P(b)         30.1
                                    P(atack)        1
                                              288.973
                                               341.31
                                    V(a>     (  52.34 )

                                    VI (c)     ' 212.01
                                    V(u ltd) (  9.979 )
                                               0.0387
                                              .0.0206
                                    MCp)     ( 0.0593 )
                                                 10.9
                                                  6.9
                                                    0
                                             (  82.20 )
          X I
(scf)     V(a atd) >
(sea)     V(a std) >
(dicta)   Q(t)     :
(dsca/ain)Q(s)     >
(acfa)    Q(a)     <
(aca/ain) Q(a)     <
(gr/dtef) C(a ttd) '
  94.7
 49.36
 1.398
   825
  23.4
  1081
  30.6
0.0185
0.0257
    59
 0.131
 0.059
                           Stack Gaa Hater Vapor Proportion     Kuo) .   »   0.168
                           Molecular weight of Stack Gas, Dry   H(d)     «   29.54
                                                          Wet   M(s)     •   27.60
                           Stack Pressure, abaolute (in Hg)     P(s)     • -30.17
                           Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)      V(t avg) •    16.9
Staple
Point

1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
....







dClock |Veleeity| Orifice | Stack Gas Meter ,|SQRT(dP)
Tiae |Head, dP|Meter,dH | Tcsp Teap (degF)
(aln) ((in H20)|(in H20) ] (degF) in
7
7
7
7
r
7
7
7
7
7
7
T









0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.09
.4
.4
.(,
.4
.6
0.09 1.6
0.07 1.2
0.07 1.2
122 86
121 95
120 101
121
121
120
120
120
0.08 1.4 | 120
0.08 1.4
0.08 1.4
0.07 | 1.2








119
119
120









out
86
87
90
104 | 93
107
109
96
105
110
109
110
111


95
98
95
97
97
98
102
102












0.2828
0.2828
0.2828
0.2828
0.3000
0.3000
0.2646
0.2646
0.2828
0.2828
0.2828
0.2646










                           FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE *

                           Velocity Head            Cue)

                           Orifice Meter Reading    C««e)
                                                                                                              1A2911SSSP

                                                                                                              dP(avg)  *   0.079

                                                                                                              dH(avg)  *   1.383
Stack Teaperature
Meter Teaperature
Root-Mean-Squre dP
(deg F)
(deg C)
(deg F)
(deg C)
(•tie)
TCt avg) * 120.3
T(a avg) • 49.0
• T(ti avg) • 99.3
T(a avg) • 37.4
SQRT(dP) « 0.281
TOT/IS |       84 |    0.95  |  16.6000  |  1443.0 | 1243.0 j  1140.0  j  3.3736 j
                                                           323
-------
ISOHKETIC RESULTS CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE fl — 1A510?SBSP
Plant: IRF Opdated 10-28-91 Performed by: J Rudd &*-
Date: 10-31-91 Printed 12/04/91 Teat No./Type: U31095SSP laokineticity XI • 92.0
Sample Location: Stack
Start/Stop
PARAMETER
SVK80L
Time: 0958-1125 Metered Saaple Caa Voluoe (acf ) V(m atd) • 47.6*
, (aco) V(a atd) « 1.349
VALUE
(calc.)
nozzle Diameter. Actual (in) H(d)
Pitot Tube Correction Factor C(p)
Cae Meter Correction Factor (alpha)
Stack (Duct) Dimmalena (in):
Radiua (if
Length (If
round)
1

0.384
0.84
0.99
7
rectangular) L -—
Width (If rectangular) U
Area of 1

.tad: (aq

Ft)

• of Simple Point*
Total Sampling Tim* (min)
laramatrie Pressure (in Ha)
Stack Pressure (in
H20)
1

«S) (1

*
' (theta) (
PCb)
P(ataek)
Caa Meter Initial Reeding (cu ft)
Caa Meter Final Reeding (cu
Net Caa Sample Vol
ft)

1.06901 )

12
84.00 )
29.85
1
Stack Caa Flow, atd cond. (daefsO 0(a) » 820
atd cond. (dsca/atn)0.(s> « 23.2
actual (acfa) «(a) « 1025
actual (acB/aln) OCa) • 129.0
Partleulate Loading, dry (gr/dacf) C(a atd) * 0.0180
a 735 O2(ar/dacf ) C(a atd) * 0.0250
8 T& 02(ae/dsea) C(a atd) - 57
Particulate Emisaion Rate (Ifa/hr) E(p) • 0.127
(kg/hr) E(p> « 0.057

.Stack Caa Uater Vapor Proportion l(wo) . * 0.113
Molecular Height of Stack Cae. Dry M(d> « 29.54
Uet M(a) « 28.24
! Stack Pressure, absolute (in- Kg) P(s) « 29.92
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec) V(s avg) « 16.0
343.655
393.434
jae (cu ft) V(m) (
Vol of Liquid Collected (al) VUc)
Vol of Liq a Std. Conda. (scf) V(u atd) (
Ut. of Filter Paniculate Can)
Ut. of Probe Utah Particular* (ga)
Ut of Coabtnid Particulate
02 Concentration
C02 Concentration
CO Concentration
U2 Concentration
sample |
Point |
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
S
6







(by CEM)
(by CEM)
(by CEM)
(by diff .
dCleck (Velocity]
(ga) M(p) (
X
X

X
> X (
Orifice |
Tie* (Head. dPJHeter.dH |
(Bin) |(in H20)|(in H20) j
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7







0.07 |
0.06
0.08
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.07







1.23
1.05
1.4
1.05
1.05
1.23
1.23
1.4

1.4
1.4
1.23







Stack |
CdegF) |
121
125
125
125
126
127
126
126
126
126
127
126






	
49.78 )
129
6.072 )
0.0493
0.0064
0.0557 )
10.9
6.9
0
82.20 )




"^

i



Gca Meter |SQRT(dP>
in | out | |
69
n
84
91
93
96
86
97 |
98
100
100
100







69 | 0.2646
70 0.2449
73 | 0.2828
FIELD DATA -AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * — 1»10ySBSf>
Velocity Head ("we) dP(avg) * 0.072
Orifice Meter Reading (<*uc) dH(avg) * '1.256

Stack Temperature (dtg F) T(s avg) » '125.5
78 0.2449 | «*tg C) T(* avg) « 51.9
82 0.2449
84 0.2646
tS 0.2646
86 0.2828
87 0.2828
86 0.2828
89 0.2828
90 0.2646



!




Meter Temperature (dag F) TO avg) <* 86.3
(deg C) T(ai avg) « 30.2

Root-Mean-Square dP ("we) SQRT(oT') « 19.267




TOTALS
             84
0.86 |  15.0700 |  1506.0  | 1091.0 |  981.0 |  3.2074
                                      324
-------
ISOKIXETTC RESULTS v
Plant:  IRF       Updated  11-11-91
Date:   11-05-91  Printed  12/04/91
Saflple Locution:  STACK

PARAMETER

Nozzle Dieaeter. Actual (In)
Pltet Tube Correction Factor
Cu Meter Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) Diaanslons (in):
        Radius (if round)
        Length (if rectangular)
        Width (if rectangular)
Area of Stack (sq ft)

• of Sacple Points
Total Sailing Tie* (Bin)
laroratric Pressure (in Kg)
Stacfc Pressure (in KM)
Gas Heter Initial Reading 
Ut of Ceobined Particulate (get)
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE f —  1IQS1050SP
Performed by:     J RUOO
Teat Ko./Type:    1S0510SOSP
Start/Stop Tine:   1050-121T
                            Isokineticity
                            Hetered Staple Gas Voluat
           VALUE
          (celc.)
N(d)        0.384
C(p)         0.8*
(alpha)      0.99
R
L
U
A(s)
                            Stack Cas Flow,  atd cond.
                                            atd cond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Particulate Leading,  dry
                                                8 7X 02(gr/dscf) C(s std) •
                                                8 IS Q2(aB/dfca>) C(a atd) •
                            Particulate Emission Rcte  (Ib/hr)   E(p)    •
                                                       (kg/hr)   E(p)    «
                                     XI
                           (scf)     V(a> std)
                           (sea)     V(a> std)
                           (dscf*)   Q(s)
                           (dscsvsrfn)O(s)
                           (acfm)    Q(a)
                           (acm/min) OCa>
                           (gr/dscf> C(s atd)
              93.2
             53.84
             1.525
               915
              2S.9
              1173
              33.2
            0.0044
            0.0064
                15
             0.035
             0.016
*
(thata)
P(b)
P(stack)
(1.06901 )

      12
(  84.00 )
   30.35
       1
 441.836
 497.443
(  SS.61 >
Stack Cas Water Vapor Proportion
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas. Dry
                               Wet
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Kg)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)
•(HO).
M(d)
M(s)
P(s)
0.141
29.51
27.89
30.42
V(s avg) »    18.3
Vl(c)
V(u std) (
                                     M(p)
     187
   8.802 )
   0.007
  0.0084
( 0.0154 )
02 Concentration (by CEN) X 11.3
COZ Concentration (by CEM) X 6.6
CO Concentration (by CEM) .X 0
N2 Concentration (by diff.) X ( 82.10)
r
Sample dClock (Velocity
Point Tie* (Head. dP
Orifice | Stack Gas Meter |SQRT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE 0 " IROSIOSOSP
Meter ,dH Temp Teap (degF) j
(•in) j(in H20)j(in H2O) j (degF) in
1 7 | 0.1 1.75
2 7 | 0.08 1.4
3 7 | 0.09 1.58
4 7 | 0.1 1.75
5 7 1 0.1 1.75
6
1
2
3
4
5
6







7
7
7
7
7
7
7







0.1
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
0.1
0.11







TOTALS | 84 | 1.12
1.75
1.23
1.4
1.58
1.75
1.75
1.23



130 73
132 82 •
132 91 ;
132 95
132
132
131
132
131
132
132
132





	
| 	
18.9200 | 1580.0
out |
73
74
78
82
97 85
99 87
93 89
98 89
100 90
100 90
101
101







1130.0
90
91




0.3162
0.2828

Velocity Need <"nc> dP(avg) • 0.093
Orifice Meter Reading ("we) dH(avg) • 1.577

0.3000 (Stack Temperature (deg F) T(s avg) • 131.7
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.2646
0.2828
0.3000
0.3162
0.3162
0.3317





(deg C) T(s avg) « 55.4

Heter Temperature (deg F) • T(> avg) * 89.5
(deg C) T(» evg) • 31.9

Root-Heen-Squarc dP (tic) SQRT(dP) • 0.305







1018.0 | 3.6593

                                                             325
-------
ISXIHETIC RESULTS ,
Plant:  1RF       Upd»ttd  11-11-91
D»t«:   11-06-91  Printed  12/04/91
Saeple location:  STACK

PARAMETER

Nozxle Diaeatar, Actual (In)
Pltot Tub* Correction Factor
CM Ntttr Correction Factor
Stick (Duct) Dimensions (In):
        RKllUi (If round)
        Length (If rectangular)
        Width (If rectangular)
Area of Stack (aq ft)

• of Saaple Polnti
Tetal Sampling Tlae (Bin)
taroastric Pressure (In Hg)
Stack Pressure (In HZO)
CM Hattr Initial (tading (cu ft)
tea Meter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Gas Saapl« Voluee (cu ft)

Vol of  Liquid Collected (ail)
Vol  of  Llq 8 Std. Conds. (acf)
Ut.  of  Filter Particulate (ga)
Ut.  of  Probe Ussh Partlculate (go)
Ut of Coablned  Psrticulate  (ga>

 02  Concentration (by.CEM)
 C02 Concentration (by C£M)
 CO  Concentration (by COO
 H2  Concentration (by dlff.)
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —  1S0610S2SP
Perforaed by:      J RUOO
Teat Ko./Type:     W061052SP
Start/Stop Tta»:   1052-1219
Isokineticity
Netered Saaple Gaa Voluee
STMOL

U(d)
C(p)
(alpha)
R
L
U
A(a)
*
(theta)
P(b>
P(atack)


V(»)
Vl<«
V(u std)


N(p>
X
X
X
X
VALUE
(calc.)
0.38*
0.84
0.99
7

....
(1.06901 )
12
( 84.00 )
30.22
1
563.208
621.665
( 58.46)
250
( 11.768 )
0.007
0.0025
( 0.009S >
11.6
6.4
0
( 82.00 )
          X I
(acf)     Vim std)
(scsi)     V(a std)
(dscfa)   0(s>
«j.aa/»in)QC«)
(ecfn)    ace)
                                     Stack Gas Flow, atd cond.
                                                    atd eond.
                                                    actual
                                                    actual
                                     Paniculate Loading,  dry  (gr/dscf)  C(s atd) •
                                                        a 7X 02(gr/dscf)  CCs std) •
                                                        8 T% 02(ng/*fecB)  C(s std) »
                                     Particulate Emission  Rate  (Ib/hr)   E(p)     •
                                                                (fcg/ttr)   E(p)     «
  96.9
 56.78
 1.608
   928
  26.3
  1242
  35.2
0.0026
o.mns
     9
 0.021
 0.009
                                     Stack Gas Water Vapor Proportion     •(%»)    »   0.172
                                     Molecular Height of Stack Gea,  Dry   N(d)     •   2f>.«9
                                                                    uet   H(S)     «   zr.sz
                                     Stack Pressure, absolute (in Mg)     P(s)     »   3(1.29
                                     Average Stack Velocity (ft/see)      V(s evg) »    H9.*
S*»plc dClock (Velocity) Orifice | Stack | Gas Meter |SO*TCdP) |FIELO DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * -- 18061052SP
Point Tint |H«ad. dP|Metcr,dH | Te^> j Teap (degF) ' \
(•in) j(in H20)j(in H20) j (degF) j in | out
1 7
2 7
3 7
4 7
S 7.
6
1
2
3
4
5
6




• —


7
7
7
7
7
7
7








0.09 | 1.58
0.09 | 1.58
0.1 j 1.75
0.11
0.12
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.11
0.1
0.11
0.11




,



1.93
2.1
1.93
1.58
1.58
1.93
1.73
1.93
1.93








132
131
132
133
133
133
133
133
133
67
76
85
88
93
96
88
97
98
133 | 109
133
133








102
IDS








67 0.3000
68 0.3000
73 0.3162
74
78
82
85
85
86
87
89
91






0.3317
1 0.3464
0.3317
; 0.3000
0.3000
0.3317
0.3162
0.3317
0.3317




. f9
|.:...

Velocity Need ("HC) dPCavg) •
Orifice Meter Reeding ("we) dM(evg) •>

Stack Tceperature (deg O T(a ayg) •
(deg C) T(e evg) *

Meter Teaperature (dee O TO avg) •
(des C) T(B avg) «

Reot-Mean-Squsre dP (*uc> SORT(dP) »

-



                                                                                                                           0.103
                                                                                                                        •>   1.798
                                                                                                                             55.9

                                                                                                                             85.8
                                                                                                                             29.9
  TOTALS |      84  |   1.23  | 21.5700 |  1S92.0 | 1093.0 |  965.0 |  3.8372
                                                              326
-------
1SOKINETIC RESULTS »
Plant:  IRF       Updated  11-11-91
Date:   11-07-91   Printed  12/04/91
Sample Location:   STACK

PARAMETER

Nozzle Diameter.  Actual <{n)
Pitot Tub* Correction Factor
CM Meter Correction Factor
Stick (Duet) Oiaantiant (In): .
        Radius (if round)
        Length (if rectangular)
        Width (if rectangular)
An* of Stack (aq ft)

f of Smple Pointa
Total Sampling Tint (Bin)
lareaetric Pressure (in Hg)
Stuck Pressure (in H20)
Cat Meter Initial Reading (eu ft)
Gait Meter Final Reading Ccu ft)
Net Ges Simple Voluae (cu ft)

Vot of Liquid Collected (•!)
Vol of Lfq a Std. Ccnda. (acf)
tit. of Filter Partieulate (gn)
Ut. of Probe Wash Paniculate Cs»»
Ut of Combined Particulate  (gai)
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * —  1S07100SSP
Performed by:     J RUOO
Teat Mo./Type:    1I07100SSP
Start/Step Tie.:  1005-1134
laokineticlty
Metered Saaple Caa Voluae
SYMBOL

M(d)
C(p)
(alpha)
R
L
W
ACS)
g
(theta)
P(b)
P(atack)


V(B)
Vl(c)
V(u atd)


M(p)
VALUE
(calc.)
0.384
0.84
0.99
7
....
....
(1.0001 )
12
( 84.00 )
30.02
1
660.144
717.568
( 57.42 )
389
( 18.310 )
0.0009
0.007
( 0.0079 )
                                     Stack Gaa Flow,  atd cond.
                                                     std cond.
                                                     actual
                                                     actual
                                     Particulate Loading, dry
                                                         e n 02(gr/o*cf> C(s std)
                                                         8 7X 02(ssj/dscB) C(a atd)
                                     Particulate Eaiaaion Rate  (Ib/hr)   E(p>
                                                                (kg/hr)   E(p)
          X I      >
(acf)     V(« atd) >
(sort     Vim atd) <
(dtcfai)   0(s)
(dsc*/«in)Q(a)
(acfai)    Q(a)     •
(acatfain) Q(a)
(gr/dacf) C(a atd) <
 104.8
 55.87
 1.582
   844
  23.9
  12SO
  35.4
0.0022
0.0029
     r
 0.016
 0.007
                                     Stack Gaa Water Vapor Proportion     Kuo) .   «  0.247
                                     Molecular Weight of Stack Gaa. Dry   M(d)     -  29.46
                                                                    Wet   M(a)     •  26.63
                                     Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)     PCs)     »  30.09
                                     Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)      V(a avg) •    19.5
02 Concentration (by CEM) X 10.6
CO! Concentration (by CEM) X 6.5
CO Concentration (by CEM) X 0
N2 Concentration (by diff .) X ( 82.90 )
Staple | dClock (Velocity) Orifice Stack
Point | Tim (Head. dPJMeter.dH Teap
j (Bin) ((in H20)j(in H20) (degF)
1 1 7
2 j 7
- 3 | 7
4 | 7
. 5 | 7
6 j 7
1
2
3
4
5
6






7
7
7
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.1
0.11
0.09
0.1
0.1
0.11
7 j 0.12
7 | 0.11
7






	 i 	
1
0.1




Gas Meter (SOJtT(dP)
Teap (degF) j
in | out |
1.4 131 | 66
1.58 131
1.58 131
1.75 131
74
82
86
65
67
70
rs
1.93 132 88 j 76
0.2828 |
FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * — 1B071005SP
Velocity Head ("we) : dP(avg) « 0.100
Orifice Meter Reading (
-------
         APPENDIX D-2




METHOD 0010 TRAIN WORKSHEETS
            328:
-------
ISOK1NETIC RESULTS
PUnt:  IRF       Updated  11-12-91
Date:   10-24-91  Printed  01/02/92
Sanple Location:  AFTERBURNER

PARAMETER         \

Nozzle Diameter. Actual           0.84
                   (alpha)         1
          EO HILL <-J<-
          1A241146AS
          1146-1423
                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE *	  1A241U6AS
                         Isokineticity
                         Metered Sample Gas Volume
                   R
                   L
                   U
                   A(S)
                   (theta)
                   P(b)
                   P(stack)
                   V(m)
                               11.63
(2.9SOS4 >

      19
( 156.00 )
   29.85
   -0.05
 830.858
 950.833
( 119.98 >
                             Stack Gas Flow,  std cond.
                                             atd cond.
                                             actual
                                             actual
                             Particular Loading, dry
                                                 B 7Z 02(gr/dscf> C(a std)
                                                 8 7X 02(mg/dsc»> C(s atd)
                             Particutate Emission Rat*   (Ib/hr)   E(p)
                                                        (kg/hr)   E(p)
          X 1
(scf)     V(m std)
(sea)     V(n std)
(dscfm)   0
                                                                  1A241146AS

                                                                  dP(ayg)  •   0.075

                                                                  dH(avg)  •   2.000

                                                                  T(a avg) «   1841.0
                                                                  T(s avg) »   1005.0

                                                                  T(« avg) «   115.7
                                                                  T(« avg) «    46.5

                                                                  SQRT(dP) *   0.274
                                                             329
-------
1KX1KETIC RESULTS
Hints  IRF       Updated  11-12-91
Date:   10-29-91  Printed  01/02/92
Swple location:  AFTERIURNER

PARAMETER         ,

Moult DliMttr, Actual On)
Pltot Tub* Correction Factor
CM H«t*r Correction Factor
Stack ;fl>uct>0la*nelena 

      19
( 150.00 >
    30.1
   -O.OS
 956.457
 1077.13
( 120.67 )
               VI(c)         446
               V(u std) ( 20.993 )
                         H/A
                         H/A
               M(p)     (    ERR >
                            Stack GM Flm. atd eond.
                                            atd eond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Particular leading,  dry
                                                9 n 02(gr/dacf> C(a etd)
                                                S 7X O2(«g/dacB) C(a atd)
                            Particulat* Eaiaaion Rat*  (lb/hr)   E(p)
                                                       Jka/hr)   E(p)
                                    X 1      '
                           (acf)     VCn atd) >
                           (sen)     V(a> atd) >
                           (dscfa)   0(a)
                           (dtoa/Bin)Q(a)     >
                           (acfn)    8US     >
                           (acsn/nin) 0(a)
                           (gr/dtcf> C(a atd)
 10S.1
112.89
 3.197
  1084
  30.7
  S9SS
                                                    NA
                                                                                                        HA
Stack CM Uat*r Vapor Proportion    S(MO)    «   0..1S7
Molecular Might of Stack CM.  Dry  M(d)     •   29.62
                               Wat  M(a)     "   27.79
Stack Proeur*. abaolut* (in Hg)    P(e)     -   30.10
Average Stack Velocity (ft/aac>     V(a avg) -    33.8
02 Concentration (by CEM) X 11.2
C02 Concentration (by CEM) X 7.3
CO Concentration (by CEM) X . 0
M2 Concentration (by diff.) X ( 01.50 )
Saaple | dCleck |V«locity| Orifice | Stack CM Mater (SdRT(dP) |
Point j TIwi JHead. dPJKeter.dH j T«p Teep (oegF) j j
j («ln) j(ln H20)j(1n H20) j (degF) In j out j j
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9-
10
11
12
1.2
3.*
5,6












12
12
12
7.8 | 12
9.10 | 12
11.12 j 12
11 | 6
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
• 0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2014 91
2014 94
2014 99
2014 108
2014 117
2014
2014
2014
2 j 2014
2 j 2014
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
78
80
83
86
89
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
126 | 92 | 0.2739
128
129
130
127
125
124
127
131
131
131
132
132
132
95
98
101
103
104
105
106
108
109
0.2739
0.2739
'0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
' 0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
110 | 0.2739 |
110 j : 0.2739
111 j 0.2739
111 j 0.2739
                                                                          Orifice Meter Reading    (««c)
                                                                          Stack Teaparature
                                                                          Meter Taaperature
                                                                          Root-Mean-Squar* dP
                                                                             (deg IF)
                                                                             (deg C)

                                                                             (deg F)
                                                                             (deg C)

                                                                             ("we)
                                                                 1A2911SSAS

                                                                 dP(avg)  «   0.075

                                                                 dH(avg)  •   2.000

                                                                 T(s avg) «  2014.0
                                                                 T(a avg) «  1101.1

                                                                 T(n avg) «   110.3
                                                                 T(a avg) •    43.S

                                                                 SORT(dP) •   0.274
 TOTALS
              150
1.43 | 38.0000 |  38266.0 | 2314.0  | 1879.0 | ' 5.2034
                                                              330
-------
1SOK1NETIC RESULTS
Plant:  1RF       Updated  11-12-91
Date:   10-31-91  Printed  01/02/92
Sample Location:  AFTERRURNER

PARAMETER         v

Nozzle Diameter, Actual (in)
Pttot Tub* Correction Factor
Gas Meter Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) Dimensions (in):
        Radius (if round)
        Length (if rectangular)
        Width (if rectangular)
Area of Stack (sq ft)

t of Sample Points'
Total Sampling Tine <»ln)
lircnetric Pressure (in HI)
Stack Pressure (in N20)
Gas Keter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Gas Heter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Gas Simple Velum (cu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected (•!)
Vol of Liq 3 Std. Condi, (scf)
lit. of Filter Particulate (gn)
Ut. of Probe Wash Particulate (gn)
Ut (if Combined Particulate (gm)
Performed by:      ED HILL CK-
Test Ho./Tvpe:     1A311000AS
Start/Stop Tine:   1000-1246

 SYMBOL    VALUE
          (calc.)
«(d)        0.598
C(p)         0.84
(alpha)         1
                                                                          CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE *	  1A311000AS
                            Isokineticity
                            Hetered Sample Gas Voliae
R
L
U
A(s)

#
(theta)
P(b)
P(stack)
            11.63
(2.95084 )

      19
( 156.00 )
   29.78
   -O.OS
  79.068
 199.965
( 120.90 )
VI(c)         450
V(H std) (21.182 )
          H/A
          H/A
H(p)     (    ERR )
                            Stack Gas Flow. Std eond.
                                            std eond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Particulate Loading,  dry
                                Y)              a 7X 02(gr/dscf) C(s std) >
                                 •               a n O2(ag/dscs)} C(s std) «
                            Particulate Emission Rate  (lb/hr>   E(p)     «
                                                       (kg/hr)   E(p)     *
                               .   -   * I      »
                           (scf)      V{« std) «
                           (sen)      Vim std) •
                           (dscfai)   0(s)     «
                           (dscsVmin)Q(s)     «
                           (acfM    Q(a)     «
                           (acw/aln) Q(a)     «
                           (gr/dsef) C(s std) «
Stack Gas tlater Vapor proportion
Molecular Height of Stack Gas. Dry
                               Wet
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)
B(wo)    «
M(d>     «
H(s)     »
P(s)     «
V(s avg) -
             100.9.
            112.17
             3.176
              1079
              30.6
              6032
             170.8
                MA
                HA
                HA
                HA
 0.159
.29.48
 27.65
 29.78
  34.1
02 Concentration (by CEH) X 5.7
C02 concentration (by CEH) X 7.8
CO Concentration (by CEH) X 0
H2 Concentration (by diff.) X ( 86.50 )
Sample
Pojnt



1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.2
21.*
S.6
•'r.».
9,10
11.12
dClock (Velocity) Orifice Stack | Gas Meter |SORT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE *
Time (Head, dPJMeter.dH Temp j Ten? (degF) j j
(•in) j(1n H20)j(in H20) (degF) j in (out j (Velocity Head («uc)


6 | 0.075 | 2 2011 | 99 | 85 | 0.2739
6 j 0.075 j 2 2011 j 111
6 j. 0.075 j 2 2011 j 116
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
2
2
2
2
2
2
0.075 | 2
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
6 | 0.075 | 2 2011
6 j 0.075 j 2 2011
12
12
12
12
12
12
11,10 12
TOTALS
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
2 2011
2 2011
120
121
122
123
121
124
86 | 0.2739
88 j 0.2739
90 j 0.2739
91
93
94
96
97
125 | 98
125
124
125
127
99
99
99
100

Orifice Meter Reading <"uc)

Stack Temperature (deg F)
(deg C)
0.2739 |
0.2739 (Meter Temperature (deg F)
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
2 2011 | 127 | 101 j 0.2739
2
2
2
2
156 ] 1.43 | 38.0000
2011
2011
2011
2011
127
127
128
127
101
102
102
102
0.2739
0.2739
(deg C)

Root-Mean-Square dp ("we)








0.2739 j
0.2739
38209.0 | 2319.0 | 1823.0 | 5.2034


                                                                                                                        I     f


                                                                                                               1A311000AS

                                                                                                               dP(avg)  •   0.075

                                                                                                               dH(avg)  »   2.000

                                                                                                               T(s avg) »  2011.0
                                                                                                               T(s avg) •  1099.4

                                                                                                               T«s avg) «   109.0
                                                                                                               T(« avg) *    42.8

                                                                                                               SORT(dP) •   0.274
                                                             331
-------
KOKIHETIC RESULTS
Plant:  JRF       Updated  11-12-91
Oats:   11-05-91  Printed  01/02/92
Staple Location:  AFTERIURHER

PARAMETER        ,

Dazzle Dlaaater. Actual (In)
Pltot Tub* Correction Factor
CM Meter Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) Olatntlcns (In):
        Radlut (if round)
        Length (if rectangular)
        Uldth (if rectangular)
Art* of Stick <*q ft)

• of Staple Points
Total Stapling Tiae (lain)
Stroaatric Pressure (in Hg)
Stack Pressure (In H20)
CM Mater Initial Reading (cu ft)
C
19
( 156.00 )
30.35
-0.05
204.296
326.402
( 122.11 )
383
( 18.028 )
N/A
H/A
                                     Stack Gas Fleu.  «td cond.
                                                     8td eond.
                                                     actual
                                                     actual
                                     Particulate Loading, dry
                                                         a 7% 02(gr/dacf)  CU >td> «
                                                         8 » 02(ag/dsca)  C(a atd) «
                                     Particulate Eailulon Rate  (Ib/lir)   E(p>     »
                                                                (kg/lir)   E(p)     •
          % I      '
Ucf)     Vim std) '
(sea)     V(a atd) >
(dscfa)   «(s)
Cdscra/ninWs)
(acfa)    a(a)    <
(•ca/ain) S(a)
(gr/dacf) C(a »td)
 100.5
114.74
 3.249
  1108
  31.4
  5966
 169.0
    HA
    MA
    MA
    NA
    MA
                                     Stack Caa Water Vapor Proportion
                                     Holecular Weight of Stack Ge*.  Dry
                                                                    Uet
                                     Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)
                                     Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)
                                     l(uo)   •
                                     N(d)    «
                                     N(s>    »
                                     P

Root-Mean-Square dP ("we)


102 0.2739
100 0.2739
100 0.2739
101 0.2739
101 0.2739
101
101
101
1906.0
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
j 5.2034




                                                                                                               1S05104SAS

                                                                                                               
-------
ISCKINETIC RESULTS
Plint:  1RF       Updated  11-12-91
Date:   11-06-91  Printed  01/02/92
Sanple location:  AFTERBURNER

MRAHETER          »

Noizle DiaMter, Actual {In)
PI tot Tube Correction Factor
Cu Meter Correction Factor
Stick (Duct) Oineniions (in):
        Radiua (if round)
        'Length (If rectangular)
        Width (If rectangular)
Area of Stack (sq ft)

* of Simple Points
Total Sampling Tine (nln)
laronetric Presaure (in Hg)
Stuck Pressure (in H20)
Gax Meter Initial Reading 
P(stack)
            11.63
(2.95084 )

      19
( 1S6.00 )
   30.22
   •0.05
  341.48
 464.968
( 123.49 )
Vl(e)         380
V(u atd) ( 17.887 )
          NVA
          N\A
M(p)     (    ERR )
                            Stack Gas Flow, std cond.
                                            •td cond.
                                            actual
                                            actual
                            Particulatc Loading,  dry
                                                8 7X 02(gr/dicf) CO ltd)
                                                a 7X 02(a«/dsc») CCs std)
                            ParticulaM Emission Rate   (Ib/hr)   E(p)
                                                       (kg/hr)   E(p)
          X I
(scf)     V(« std) >
(SCB)     V(« std) •
(dscfai)   0(s)
(dscsi/«in)a(*)
(acf»    Q(a)
(aca/arfn) 0(a)
(gr/dscf) C(s std)
 102.8
117.27
 3.321
  1107
  31.3
  5987
 169.5
    NA
    HA
    NA
    NA
    NA
Stack Gaa Hater Vapor Proportion
Molecular Height of Stack Gas, Dry
                               uet
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/see)
          M(d)
          N(s)
          PCs)
          V(s avg)
 0.132
 29.54
 28.01
 30.22
  33.8
02 Concentration (by CEH) X 6
COi! Concentration (by CEM) X 8.1 • -
CO Concentration (by CEM) X 0
N2 Concentration (by diff .) X ( 85.90 >
Sauple
Point

1
2
3
4
5
dClock
Tim
(•in)





Velocity) Orifice | Stack | Gas Meter |SORT(df>) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE f — 1B061100AS
Head, dPJHeter.dH j Temp j Temp (degF) j
(in H20)j(in H20) j (degF) j in | out | Velocity Head ("we) dP(avg) > 0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
6 j 0.075
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.2
3.4
5.6
7.8
9.10


12
12
12
12
12
11,12 | 12
11,10 j 12
TOTALS
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
	 " " • 	 - 	 ' 	 1
2042 | 70 | 68 0.2739 (Orifice Meter Reading («nc)  2.000
2042 | 89 j 69 0.2739 j
2042 j 105 j 73 0.2739 (Stack Temperature (deg F) Us avg) » 2042.0
2042 | 115
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
2042
115
118
120
122
77 0.2739
81
65
88
91
123 j 93
124
125
12S
125
127
94
96
97
98
99
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
127 j 100 j 0.2739
128
128
128
128
101
101
101
101
156 | 1.43 | 38.0000 | 38798.0 | 2242.0 | 1713.0
0.2739
0.2739
(deg C) T(s avg) » 1116.7

Meter Temperature (deg F> T(« avg) « 104.1
(deg C) T(B avg) * 40.0

Root-Mean-Square dP ("we) ; SQRT(dP) * 0.274








0.2739 |
0.2739 j
5.2034 |
                                                            333
-------
ISOKINETIC RESULTS
Plant:  IRF       Updated  11-12-91
Oat*:   11-07-91   Printed  01/02/92
Sanpl* Location!   AFTER1URHER

PARAMETER  :        \

Kotxl* Diameter,  Actual (In)
Pilot Tub* Correction Factor
Cat Katar Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) Dimensions (fn>:
        Radius (if round)
        Lanath (ff rectangular)
        Width (If rectangular)
Are* of Stack (*q ft)

* af Sample Points
Total Sampling Time (ailn)
farometric Presmre (in Ha)
Stack Pressure (in H20)
Caa Hater Initial Reading (cu ft)
Caa Meter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Caa Sampl* Volume (cu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected (ml)
Vol of Liq a Std. Condi. («cf)
Ut. of Filter ("articulate (gm)
Ut. of Probe Uuh PartlcuUte (gm)
Ut of Cabined Paniculate (pa)

02  Concentration (by CEM)
C02 Concentration (by CEM)
CO  Concentration (by CEM)
M2  Concentration (by dlff.)
                                                                          CALCULATED RESULTS  FOR 'SAMPLE * —  1D071017AS
                                    Performed by:      ED HILL
                                    Test No./Type:     1B071017AS
                                    Start/Stop Time:  . 1017-1257

                                     SYMBOL    VALUE
                                              (calc.)
                                    N(d)        0.598
                                    C(p)        0.84
                                    (alpha)        1
                            Icokinaticity
                            Uttered Sample Cat Volume
                                    R
                                    L
                                    U
                                    Art)

                                    C
                                    (that*)
                                    P(b)
                                    P(ctack)
                                                11.63
                            Stack Caa Flow, »td eond.
                                            std cond.
                                          ' actual
                                            actual
                            Particulat* Loading,  dry
                                                8 7X 02(gr/dsef) C(s std)
                                                8 7X 02(mg/d9cm) C(s std)
                            PartlcuUt* Emission Rat*  (Ib/hr)   E(p)
                                                       (kg/ho-)   E(p)
                                    XI      '
                          (scf)     V(ei std) '
                          (sen)     Vim std) '
                          (dscfra)   0(s)
                          (dscB/mfn)
                          («cia/nin> 0(8)
                          (gr/dscf) C(a std)
                                                            99.8
                                                          113.23
                                                           3.206
                                                            1102
                                                            31.2
                                                            6014
                                                           170.3
                                                              HA
                                                              HA
                                                              HA
                                                              HA
                                    V(m)
(Z.95084 )

      19
( 156.00 )
   30.02
   -0.05
 472.796
 592.346
( 119.55 )
Stack 6a» Water Vapor Proportion    i(wo)    •   0.133 '
Molecular Height of Stack Cam, Dry  M(d)     -   29.52
                              Vst  M(s)     «   27.99
Stack Preatur*, absolute (in Hg)    P(s)     •   30.02
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)      V(s avg) «    34.0
                                    VI(c)         370
                                    V(u std) ( 17.416 )
                                              N\A
                                              UNA
                                    M(p)     (    ERR >
                                    X
                                    X
                                    X
                                    X
     6.1
       8
       0
   85.90 )
 Staple  | dCloek
 Point  j  Tin*
        I  («In)
                |Velocity| Orifice  |  Stack
                JHead, dPJMeter.dH  j  Temp
                j(1n H20)j(in H20)  j (degF)
     Cat  Meter
    Temp  (degF)
    in    |  out

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1,2
3.4
s.«
7.8
9,10
11.12
11.10

6
6
«
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
12
12
12
12
12
12

0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046
2046

80
94
104
110
114
116
118
118
120
120
121
121
120
123
124
124
123
123
123

£9
71
74
77
00
83
86
38
90
91
93
94
95
97
97
98
97
97
97
"• 	 1
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
6.2739
0.2739
6.2739
6.2739
6.2739
6.2739
6.2739
0.2739 j
6.2739 |
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
6.2739
0.2739
0.2739
0.2739
|SORT(dP)  (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE *
II
j   j       jVelocity Head            ("weS

          Orifice Meter Reading    («uc>
                                                                           Stack Temperature
                                                                           Meter Temperature
                                                                           Root-Mean-Squar* dP
                                                                                                  (deg F)
                                                                                                  (deg C)

                                                                                                  (deg F)
                                                                                                  (deg C)

                                                                                                  ("*«
                                     1S071017AS

                                     dP(avg)  »   0.1)75

                                     dH(avg)  •   2.000

                                     T(s avg) •  204A.O
                                     T(s avg) •  11111.9

                                     !(• avg) >   101.8
                                     T(« avg) »    33.8

                                     SQRT(dP) •   0.1274
TOTALS
             1S6
                      1.43  | 38.0000  | 38874.0 | 2196.0  | 1674.0.)  5.2034 j
                                                             334  :
-------
ISOKINETIC RESULTS
Plant:
Date:
IRF updated 10-28-91
10-24-91 Printed 12/04/91
Sasple Location: Scrubber Exit


PARAMETER


Nozzle Diameter, Actual (in)
Pilot Tube Correction factor
Gas Meter Correction Factor
Performed by:
Teat Mo./Type:
Start/Stop Time:

SYMBOL

M(d)
C(p)
(alpha)

VALUE
(calc.)
0.359
0.84
1
CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE f — 1A241146ES
I Jackson C#-
1A241146ES
1146-1450












Stapk (Duct) DiSMnnions (in):



Area of

Radius (if- round)
Length (if rectangular)
Uidth (if rectangular)
Stack (sq ft)

t
I
U
A(*B% i
7
....
....
4 fUCMM



\




A%Vf \ e*wwrva t
* of Sanple Pointa *
Total Sampling Tim (min)
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)
Stack Pressure (in H20)
(thau) l
Plb)
P(stack)
Gas Meter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Gas Meter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Gas
Sanple Volume (cu ft)
Vol of Liquid Collected (ml)
Vol of Liq 3 Std. Condi, (scf )
V(m) <
VUc)
V(u std) (
Ut. of Filter Particulate (go)
Ut. of Probe Uash Paniculate (gm)
Ut of Combined Particulate (em)
02 Concentration (by CEM)
C02 Concentration (by CEM)
CO Concentration (by CEM)
N2 Concentration (by diff .)
Sample
Point

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7'
8
7
6

dClock (Velocity) Orifice
Time (Head, dPJMeter.dH
(min) j (in H20)|(in 1120)
0.12 | .5
0.12 j .5
0.12 | .S
0.12 .5
0.12 .5
0.14 1.8
0.14 1.8
0.14 1.8
0.14 1.8
0.14 j 1.8
0.14 1.8
0.14 1.8
0.13 1.6
0.13 1.6
0.13 1.6
8 0.13 1.6
8 0.099 1.2
33 0.099 1.2
H(p) I
X
X
X
18
169.00
29.85
-5
596.664
715.066

)










Isokineticity XI • 90.4
Hcterad Sample Gas Volume (scf) V(m atd) • 107.49
(scm) V(m std) « 3.044
Stack Gas Flow, atd cond. (dscfm) OCs) - 1071
atd cond. (dscm/min)Q(s) • 30.3
actual (acfm) Q(a) « 1398
actual (acm/min) Q(a) » 39.6
Paniculate Loading, dry (gr/dscf ) C(s std) • MA
8 7X 02(gr/dscf ) C(s std) •> MA
a 1% 02(mg/dsca) C(s atd) • ' MA
Paniculate Emission Rate (Ib/hr) E(p) • MA
(kg/hr) E(p) « HA

Stack Gas Hater Vapor Proportion l(wo) . . 0,117
Molecular Weight of Stack Gaa. Dry N(d> • 29.46
~ Uet M(s) « 28.12
Stack Pressure, abaolute (in Hg) P(s> « 29.48
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sac) . V(a avg) « 21.8


118.40 )
302



14.215 )
H/A
M/A
ERR :
9.7
6.7
0
X ( 83.60 ]
Stack
T«P
(degF)
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140

Gaa
Tamp
in
96
110
118
125
129
134
136
139
133
136
137
138
139
141
141
141
140
139



'


















Meter (SORT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * -- 1A241146ES
(degF)
out
86
91
96
103
105
112
114
117
115
116
116
120
121
123
124
124
124
123



(Velocity Head ("we) dP(avg) « 0.128
,. 	 i.j
0.3464 (Orifice Meter Reading («uc) dH(avg) « 1.606
0.3464

0.3464 (Stack Temperature (deg F) TCs avg) » 140.0
0.3464
0.3464
(deg C) T(s avg) • 60.0
,
0.3742 (Meter Temperature (deg F) ' T(m avg) « 122.3
0.3742
0.3742
(deg C) T(m avg) - 50.2
•
0.3742 (Root-Mean-Square dP ("we) SORT(dP) « ' 0.357
0.3742
0.3742
0.3742
0.3606
0.3606
0.3606
0.3606
0.3146
0.3146



•







TOTALS
            169
                    2.30  | 28.9000 |  2520.0 | 2372.0 |  2030.0  |  6.4227
                                                          335
-------
ISOMMEUC RESULTS
Plant: 1RF Updated
Date:
10-29*91 Printed
10-28-91 Performed by: 1 Jackson
CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE SI — 1A291158ES
CK-
12/05/91 Teat Ho./Type: 1A291158ES laokineticity XI • 90..9
Saeple Location: Scrubber Exit Start/Stop




PARAMETER

STMSOL
Tin: 1221-1527

VALUE


(calc.)
Mozxte Blas»ter, Actual (In) Jl(d)
Pltot Tube Correction Factor 'c(p)
CM Hater Correction Factor
Stack (Duet) DiBen
Radius (If
Length (if
(alpha)
0.359
0.84
1



alone (in):
.rand)
R
7

rectangular) L ----
Uidth (If rectangular) U
Area of Stack (sq
ttj
* of Sanple Peinta
....

Ma) (i.uoyui j
f
Total Saepling Tie* (Bin)
Ctheuo (
liroMtric Pretture (in Kg) P(b)
Stack Pressure (In
H20)
P(ataek)
Cu Meter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Cu Mater Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Cu Saaple Vol
uoe (cu ft) V{ai> (
Vol of Liquid Collected Ml)
Vol of Liq a Std.
Conda. (scf)
Vl(c)
V(u atd) (
Ut. of filter Particulate (gai)
Ut. of Probe Wash
Particulate (gai)
Ut ef Coabined Particulate
02 Concentration
C02 Concentration
CO Concentration
M2 Concentration
Staple
Point
(by CEM)
(by CEM)
(by CEM)
(by dlff.
dClock (velocity)
(gn)



1
Orifice j
HCp) (
X
X
X
X (
Stack |
Tl«e (Head. d> Meter.dH 1 Teap 1
(•In) j(in H20)j(in H20) j
1
2
3
4,
S
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
7
" 1
10
11

9
11
9.5
10
11
11
9.5
10
11
10
11
11
4,


0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
' 0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12


.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5-
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
•5
•s
	

(degF) |
134 |
134
134
133
133
133
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134


17
171.00 )
29.85
-5
721.92
838.31 .
116.39 )
268
12.615 )
H/A
H/A
ERR )
8.1
7.9
0
84.00 )
6aa
Teap
in
89
106
116
121
123
124
125
123
121
124
126
127
128
129
130
129
129


















i Metered Saaplc Gee Volute (acf ) VCn atd) » 107.66
! (so) VC« atd) « 3.049
; Stack Sac Flow, atd cond. (dscfn) Q(a) • 10S4
atd cond. (dscsi/ninXXa) • 29.,9
actual (acfai) SCO) » 1*14
actual (aca/iiln) Q(a) ,» 38., 1
| Partieulate Loading, dry (gr/dcef ) CC* atd) • IIA
8 7% 02(gr/d«cf ) C(a std) « IIA
; 8 72 02(ng/d*cs» CCS atd) « IIA
Particulate Earfaaion Rate (Ib/hr) E(p) - " IIA
(kg/hr) E(p) « IIA
i Sseefe Sea Water Vapor Proportion B(uo) : » 0.105
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas. Dry M(d) « 29.S9
' • ~ Uct IICs) « 28.37
Stack Pressure, absolute (In Hg) !'{»). • 29.'i8
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec) V(s evg) • 21.0


!




i
i

i

Meter (SQRT(dP)
-------
1SOKIMETIC RESULTS
Plant: 1RF Updated 11-11-91
Date: 10-31-91 Printed 12/04/91
SaapU Location: Scrubber Exit

PARAMETER

HoziU Disaster, Actual (In)
Pitot Tube Correction Factor
Sac Hotar Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) Oiaensions (in):
Radius (if round)
Length (if rectangular)
Width (if rectangular)
Arc*) of Stick (MI ft)

f of Sample Point*
Total Sampling Tine (Bin)
larcautric Pressure (in Hg)
Stack Pressure (in H20)
Gas Miter Initial lending (cu ft)
Gas Niter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Cis Sanple Voluw (cu ft)
Vol of Liquid Collected (nl)
Vol of Llq a Std. Conds. (sef )
Ut. of Filter Particulate Com)
Ut. of Probe Wash Particulate Com)
Ut of Combined Partieulate (ga)
02 Concentration (by CEM)
£02 Concentration' (by CEN)
CO Concentration (by CEH)
HZ Concentration (by diff.)
Saopla | dClock |Velocity| Orifice
Point | Tiae JHeid, dPJMetcr,dH
j (ain) j(in H20)|(in H2O)


CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE # 	
1A311000ES
Performed by: R Jackson CJZ-
Test No./Type: 1A311MOCS
Start/Stop Tiae: 1000- 1304

CYM80L

N(d)
CCp>
(alpha)

R
L
W
Af*%
Ml»J
f
(ttieta)
P(b)
PUtack)


V(B)
Vl(c)
V(u std)


H(p)
X
X
X
X
| Stack
1 T-p
j (degF)

VALUE
(calc.)
0.359
0.84
1

7
....
....
/4 Ajtani %
\ 1 .UO1WI }
16
( 176.00 )
29.78
-5
842.878
959.855
( 116.98 )
342
( 16.098 )
H/A
H/A
( ERR )
8.2
7.9
0
( 83.90 )
| Gas Hater jSORT(dP)
j Tea? (degF) j
| in | out |
Isokinettcity
Meterad Sample Gas Voluaa (scf )
(scat)
Stack fias Flov, std cand. (dscfa)
X I
V(a std)
V(a std)
0(s)
m
m
m
m
std cond. (dsca/ain)Q(s) »
actual (acfa)
actual (aca/ain)
Particulate Leading, dry (gr/dscf )
a 7X 02(gr/dscf )
8 7X 02(ag/dsca)
Partieulate Eaioion Rats (Ib/hr)
(kg/hr)

Stack Ga* Water Vapor Proportion
Holacular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry
Wet
Stack Pressure, absolute i in Hg)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)










^

FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE f —

velocity Head ("we)
S(a)
a(a)
CCs std)
C(s std)
Cts std)
f(p)
E(p)

Kuo)
H(d)
H(s)
P(s)
V(s avg)












m
m
m
m
m
m
m

m
m
m
m
m












96.0
109.25
3.094
984
27.9
1298
36.8
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA

0.128
29.59
28.10
29.41
20.2












1A311000ES

dP(evg)

m

0.110
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
S
1
z
3
4.
5
6
7
8


....

TOTALS
11
11
11
11
11
11
1 11
11
«
«
11
11
11
11
11
11


....

176
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11


....
....

1.76
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4




22.4000
136
136
136
136
136
136
137
137
137
137
137
137
137
137
137
137




2186.0
85
97
107
- 111
114
116
118
118
108
11S
118
120
121
121
121
121


....

1811.0
79
82
87
90
93
95
98
99
98
98
100
101
102
103
103
103


....
....

1531.0
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317


....
....

5.3066
Orifice Heter Reading

Stack Taaperature


Hater Teaperature


Root-Hean-Sojuare dP
'











                                     (•tic)

                                     (deg F)
                                     (deg C)

                                     (dtg F)
                                     (deg C)

                                     (•uc)
dH(avg)  «

T(s avg) »
T(s avg) *

T(a avg) «
T(a avg) «
                                                             1.400
136.6
 58.1
104.4
 40.2
                                                SORT(dP) •   0.332
337
-------
ISCKIKETIC RESULTS
Plant!  1RF       Updated 11-11-91
Date:   11-05-91   Printed 12/04/91
SaipU Location:   Scrubber Exit

PASAKETER

KoixU Oia»eter.  Actual (in)
Pitet Tub* Correction Factor
Caa Meter Correction Factor
Stack (Duet) Dimensions (in):
        ladtui (if •round)
        Length (If rectangular)
        Width (If rectangular)
Area of Stack (tq ft)

ff ef Seaple Points
Tetal Sampling Time (>in)
Itraaatrlc Pressure (in Mg)
Stack Pressure (in H20)
CM Keter Initial Reading (cu ft)
Caa Keter Final leading (cu ft)
Net Caa Sample Voltm  (eu ft)
 Vol of Liquid Collected
 Vel of Liq S Std. Conda. («cf )
 Ut. ef Filter Paniculate (ge»
 Ut. of Probe U*sh 'articulate (g
 Ut of Combined  Paniculate (9")
Perforatd by:     * Jackson <^
Test Ko./Type:     1I051047ES
Start/Stop TIM:  1047-1353   .

 snoot.    VALUE              i
          (calc.)
M(d>        0.359
C(p)         0.84
(alpha)         1

R               7
L         	
U         	
A(a)     (1.06901 )

t              16
(theta)  ( 176.00 )
p(b)        30.35
P(atack)       -5
          959.863
          1080.76
V(»      ( 120.90 )

Vt(c)        325
V(u std)  ( 15.298 )
           M\A                 !
           N\A
 M(p)     (    ERR )
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAKPLE 1»	  1B051047ES
Isokinatieity « ' •
Metered Sample Cas Volume (scf) V(m std) »
(sea) VOe std) «
Stack Gas Flou, std cond. (dscfo) fl(s) «
atd eond. (dKcm/ain)Q(s) •
actual (aefai) Q(a> •
actual (soa/nin) 0(a) »
Pareiculate Loading, dry (gr/dscf) C C(a std) -
Particulate Emission Rate (Ib/hr) E(p) *
(kg/hr) E(p) «
Stack Gaa Water Vapor Proportion i(wo) «
Molecular Height of Stack Gai, Dry H(d) «
Ust H(s) >
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Kg) P(s) «
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec) V(s avg) >
104.7
115.17
3.277
9!i6
27.1
1228
34.8
II*
!M
IU
MA
HU
0.117
29.52
28.18
29.98
19.1
02 Concentration (by CBO X 8.1
C02 Concentration (by CEH) X 7-5

CO Concentration (by CEH) X ° r
H2 concentration (by diff.) % ( «•«> >
Saepl* | dClock IVelocltyj Orifice
Point | Tie* iHead. dPlHeter.dH
j (Bin) |(ln H20)|(in H2O)
1
2

I
5
g
7
g
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

11
tl
ff
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1 •
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.4
1.4
.4
.4
.4
Stack Cas Hater js
Teaa Temp (degF) j
(degF) in \ out j
140 72
140 84
140 93
140
140
.4 140
.4 140
.4 140
.4 141
.4 141
0. | .* 1*1
0. | .4 141
0.
0.
0.
0.

.... , 	 , 	
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4


	 j 	 |- — ,. —
TOTALS | 176 | 1.60 | 22.4000
141
100
108
69
70
76
81
87
«RT(dP> (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE IF --
(Velocity Head Cue)
	 j
0.3162 (Orifice Meter Reading ("uc)
0.3162

0.3162 (Stack Temperature (deg F)
0.3162
0.3162
114 | 92 j 0.3162
118
119
111
117
120
121
125
141 1 119
141
141



122
124



96 !
0.3162
9S 1 0.3162
99|
99
100
102
1103
100
100
101



0.3162
10.3162
(dog C)

Hetcr Temperature (dee F)
(d@8 C)

Root-Hean-Squarc dP (uue)
. 0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
T"
i
2248.0 | 1767.0 | 1473.0 | ! 5.0596




                                                                                                              130S1047ES

                                                                                                              dP(avg)  «   0.100

                                                                                                              dH(avg)  *   1.400

                                                                                                              T(a avg) •   140.5
                                                                                                              T(s avg) »    <0.3

                                                                                                              Urn avg) •   10H.3
                                                                                                              T(» avg) *    38.5

                                                                                                              SQRT(dP) •   0.316
                                                               338
-------
1SOKIHETIC RESULTS
Plant: IRF
Date: 11-06-91
Sample Location:

PARAMETER

updated
Printed
Scrubber



11-11-91
12/04/91
Exit



Mottle Diameter, Actual (in)
Pitut Tube Correction Factor
Gas Neter Correction Factor
Performed
by:
Test Mo./Type:
Start/Stop Time:

SYMBOL

N(d)
C(p)
(alpha)

VALUE
(calc.)
0.359
0.84
1
CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * — 1B0610S7ES
R Jackson <££-
1I061057ES Isokineticity XI » 102.4
1057-1358 Metered Staple Gas Volume (scf) V(m std) » 119.20






Stank (Duct) Dimensions (in):
Radius (if round)
Length (if rectangular)
Width (if
Arm of Stack (sq

rectangular)
ft)


R
L
U
• r«t t
7
....
....
1 nxent



k

* otf Sample Points
Totnl Sailing Time (min)
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)
Stack Pressure (in HZO)
Gas Meter Initial
it
(theta) (
P(b)
P(stack)
Reading (cu ft)
Gas Meter Final Rending (cu ft)
Net Gas Sample Volume (cu ft)
Vol of Liquid Collected 
Velocity) Orifice
Head, dP
Meter.dH
(in H20)|(in HZO)
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
•s
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5



1.76
24.0000
16
176.00
30.22
-5
80.771
205.733
124.96
320
15.062
N\A
N\A
M(p) ( ERR
X
X
X
X 1
Stack
Te»p
(degF)
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138
138



2208.0
8.3
7.4
0
84.30
Gas
Temp
in
68
81
94
106
112
116
118
120
110
117
121
122
124
125
124
123



1781.0

1






1







(sea) V(m std) • 3.376
Stack Gas Flow, std cond. (dscfm) OCs) « 1007
std cond. (dscm/arfn)0(s> « 28.5
actual (acfai) S(a) « 1287
actual (acm/min) Q(a) » 36.4
Particulate Loading, dry (gr/dscf ) C(s std) « HA
a 7X 02(gr/dscf ) C(s std) » HA
8 7X 02(«g/dscm) C(s std) * HA
Particulate Emission Rate (Ib/hr) E(p) « HA
(kg/hr) E(p) • HA

Stack Gas Water Vapor Proportion • Kuo) » 0.112
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry M(d) > 29.52
Wet M(s) > 28.22
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg) P(s) » 29.85
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec) : V(s avg) * 20.1











*•
Meter |SQRT(dP)
{degF)
out
64
67
72
79
85
90
93
96
96
96
99
100
' 101
101
104
104



1447.0


0.3317
FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * -- 1B0610S7ES

Velocity Head (««) dP(avg) » 0.110
Orifice Meter Reading ("we) dH(avg) * 1.500
0.3317 |
0.3317 (Stack Teaperature ' (deg F) Us avg) * 138.0
0.3317
0^3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317



5.3066
. (dee C> T(s avg) • 58:9

Meter Teaperature (deg F) Tda avg) * 100.9
(deg C) TO avg) * 38.3

Root-Mean-Square dp Cue) SSRT(dP) « 0.332








339
-------
ISOK1HETIC RESULTS
Pilot:  IRF       Updated  11-11-91
Oat*:   11-07-91  Printed  01/09/92
Saiple Location:  Scrubber Exit
                        \
PARAMETER

Nozzle Diameter. Actual 
(ucm/nin) oca)
(gr/dscf) CCs std)
 101.9
122.69
 3.474
  1041
  29.5
  1354
  38.3
    MA
    HA
    NA
    HA
    HA
                                     Stack Gas Water Vapor Proportion     S(uo)
                                     Molecular Weight of Stack Can. Dry   MCdJ
                                                                    Wet   MCs)
                                     Stack Pressure, absolute (in Kg)     PCs)
                                     Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)      VCs avg)
                                                  0.118
                                                  29.45
                                                  28.09
                                                  29.65
                                                   21.1
Saaple
Point

,
2
3
*
;
4
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8


dClock (Velocity) Orifice
Tine (Head, dPJHeter.dH
(•in) ((in HZO)|(in H20)
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11



....
TOTALS | 176
0.12 | 1.6
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12




1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
, 1.6




Stack | Gas Meter |SQRT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * -- 18071010ES
Ten? 1 Temp (degF)
(degF) j in
out
140 | 66 65
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
83 66
' 98 72
111 80
117 90
119 94
120 96
121
103
113
119
121
122
122
120
120



98
94
94
96
97
99
99
100
101



1

1 (velocity Head ("we) dP(avg) =
0.3464 (Orifice Meter Reading (°*uc) dH(avg) *
0.3464

- 0.3464 (Stack Temperature (deg F) TCs avg) *
i 0.3464 |
i 0.3464 j
(dec C) TCs avg) «

! 0.3464 (Meter Temperature (dec F) TO svg) *
, 0.3464
1 0.3464
(deg C) T(s avg) *

I 0.3464 (Root-Mean-Square dP (*uc) SQRT(dP) «
! 0.3464
i 0.3464
; 0.3464
I 0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
| 0.3464



:""':::"". 	 ^ 	
1.92 | 25.6000 | 2240.0 | 1775.0
1441.0
, 5.5426

"






'
.
                                                                                                                            0.120
                                                                                                                            1.600
                                                                                                                             60.0
                                                                                                                             38.1
                                                                                                                            0.346
                                                             340
-------
           APPENDIX D-3




METHOD 5 METALS TRAIN WORKSHEETS
               341
-------
1KXJKET1C RESULTS
Plant: IRF
Date: 10-^4-91
Sacple location:

PARAMETER
, CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * — 1A241146EM
Updated 10-28-91 Performed by: R Jackion CS--
Prlnted 12/04/91 Test Ho./Type: 1A241146EH j Isokineticity % I • 94.6
Scrubber Exit Start/Stop





STKIQL
Tine: 1146-1450

VALUE

Metered Saaple Gas Volute (sef) V(a std) « 105.14

(sea) V(a std) « 2.977
Stack Gas Flow, atd cend. (dscfa) Q(s> • 1013
(eale.)
Kozile Diameter. Actual (in) H C(s std) « MA
i Particulate Ealaslon Rat* (tb/hr) E(p) > HA


(kg/fir) §(p) « HA

Stack Gas Uatcr Vapor Proportion 8(wo) . • 0.167
t ef Saaple Points . *
Total Saapline Tia* (Bin)
•ireattrtc Pressure (in HB)
Stack Pressure (In H20)
ds Meter Initial
(theta) (
P(b)
P(stsek)
Reading (cu ft)
Cis Meter Final Reading (cu ft)
18
169.00 )
29.85
-5
563.35
Molecular "eight of Stack Sas. Dry H(d) • 29.46


(let M(s) - 27.54
Stack Pressure, absolute (In jig) P(s) « 29.48
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec) V(s avg) > 21.9



677.079
Met Cis Saaple Voluat (cu ft) V(B) (
Vol ef Liquid Collected (al)
Vel ef Llq a Std.
Condi, (acf)
Ut. of Filter Paniculate (ga)
Ut. of Probe U*th Paniculate (ga)
Ut of Ceablned Paniculate (ga)
02 concentration (by CEH)
C02 Concentration (by CEH)
Vl(c)
V(u std) (
113.73 )
449.13
21.141 )



•
i




M\A
N\A
K(p) (
X
X
CO, Concentration (by' CEH) X
112 Concentration (by diff.)
tuple | dClock
Point j Tlae
j (ain)
1 8
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
7
6 33

1
TOTALS | 169
(Velocity) Orifice
JHead. dPJHeter.dH
j(ln H20)j(in K20)
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.099
0.099
0.099


| 2.27
1.5
1.5
1.5
.5
.5

a

.8-

.
.

.
.4
.2
.2
1.2


28.1000
X (
Stack
Te«p
(degF)
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140


2520.0
ERR )
9.7
6.7
0






. ,
f




83.60 ) i „
Gas
Tea?
in
97
108
115
112
117
123
124
126
124
126
126
127
127
127
127
127
115
114

Meter JSOHT(dP)
(degF) j
out |
as
91
95
97
99
103
10S
'106
106
107
108.
110
111
112
112
113
99
99


2162.0
1861.0
(
t
i
0.3464
6.3464
6.3464
6.3464
6.3464
6.3742
0.3742
0.3742
FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * -- 1A241146EM

Velocity Head (*>uc) dP(ovg) • 0.126
Orifice Meter Reading ("us) dH(avg) • 1.561

Stack Taaperature (dog F) T(s avg) • 140.0
(dofl C) T(a avg) • M.O

Meter Taaperature (des F) T(a avg) • 111. 8
(dtg C) • T(e avg) - <14.3

0.3742 |Root-Mean-Square dP ("us) SMT(dP) « 0.354
0.3742
0.3742
6.3742
0.3606
0.3606
0.3606
0.3146
0.3146
0.3146
>•«
i
| ^.3768






'




342
-------
ISDK1IIETIC RESULTS
Plants
Date:
1RF v
10-29-91
SaipUi Location:


Updated
Printed
Scrubber

10-28-91
12/04/91
Exit

PARAMETER

"


Nozzlv Diamter, Actual (in)
Pilot Tube Correction Factor
Gas Muter Correction Factor
Stack (Duet) Diem
Performed
bys
Test No./Type:
Start/Stop Tim:

SYMBOL

N(d)
C(p)
(alpha)

VALUE
(calc.)
0.357
0.84
1
CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * — 1A2911S8EH
R Jackson Cfc-
1A291158EM Isokineticity XI « 92.1
1158-1521 Netered Staple Gas Volum (scf) V(B std) « 115.13






Miens (in): ,"o
Radius (if round)
Length (if rectangular)

Aru (if

Width (if
Stack (sq

reetengular)
fei
HJ

1
L
U
*t»\ t
7
....
....
'« IUOA4
 C(s std) - NA
8 7X 02(Bg/dscB) C(s std) « NA
Particulate Emission Rate (Ib/hr) E(p) • HA
(kg/hr) E(p) « NA

Stack Gas Water Vapor Proportion l(uo). « 0.117
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas. Dry M(d) » 29.59
Uet M(s) * 28.23
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg) PCs) « 29.48
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sac) V(s avg) » 21.0




V(H std) ( 15.258 )
Ut. of Filter Particulate (ga)
Wt. of Probe Wash
Particulate (g>)
Ut of Combined Particulate (ga)
02 Concentration
C02 Concentration
CO Concentration
112 Concentration
(by CEM)
(by CEM)
(by CEM)
(by dlff .



H\A
NVA




M(p> ( ERR )
X
X
X
8.1
7.9
0
> X ( 84.00
SMpU> dClock |Velocity| Orifice
Point:
Tie* (Heed. dP (Meter ,dN
(•in) |(in H20)|(in HZO)
1
2!
S
t
S
6
7
1)
t
Z
J
{,
5
6
r
s
7
6

11
11
10
11
«
11
9.5
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
2
9
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
11 j 0.12
11 j 0.12


1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
.S
.5
.5
.5
.5
•5
-s
-5
.5
.5
.5

Stack
Teep
(degF)
134
134
134
134
134
133
133
133
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134
134

Gas
Teep
in
87
101
111
115
118
120
121
121
109
119
121
122
121
119
120
122
122
123



»



*
Mater |SBRT(oT>> (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * — 1A291158EN
(degF)
out
84
85
90
98
98
102
103
104
103
104
104
105
106
106
106
107
107
107

I

0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464 .
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464

Velocity Heed ("we) dP(avg) • 0.120
Orifice Mater Reading ("MC) dH(avg) « 1.500

Stack Temperature (deg F) T(s avg) - 133.8
(deg C) T(s avg) - 56.6

Meter Teapereture (deg F) T(B evg) « 108.6
(deg C> T(B avg) « 42.6

Roet-Meen-Squere dP (*ttc) SQRT(dP) « 0.346










TOTALS
184.5 |   2.16 | 27.0000 |  2409.0 | 2092.0 j 1819.0 |  6.2354 j
                                                    343
-------
ISCKIHETIC RESULTS
Mint!  1RF       Updated  11-11-91
Dtt*:   10r31-91  Printed  12/04/91
Saeple Location:  SCRUUER EXIT

PARAMETER

»oizl« DiaMter, Actual  (in)
Utot Tubt Correction Factor
Cat Meter Correction Factor
Suck (Duct) Olncnaiont  (in);
        Radius (If  round)
        Length (If  rectangular)
        Uldth (If rtctaneular)
Arti of Stack («q ft)

f of SMple Points
Total Sailing TiM («in>
tiroMtrlc Presiture (In Hg)
Stack Pressure (in H20)
Cu Mater Initial Readina (cu ft)
Cw Keter Final Reading (cu ft)
Net Cat Sa*pl* Volta* (cu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected (ml)
Vol of Liq a Std. Condi. «cf)
Ut. of Filter Pirticulate Cs»>
Ut.  of Probe With Partlculate 
*
(theta)
P(b)
P(stack)
                                    Stack Gas Flou,  std cond.
                                                    std cand.
                                                    actual
                                                    actual
                                    Pareiculate Leading,  dry
                                                        a 7X 02(gr/dsef) C(s std) <
                                                        8 7X OZtae/dscB) CO std) <
                                    Paniculate Emission Rate   (Ib/hr)   E(p)
                                                               (ks/hr)   E(p)
                                    X I
                                    V(n std)
                                    Vim std)
                                    0(s>
                          (dec*/iain)a(s)
                          Ceefn)    Q(s)
                          (ace/Bin) 0(e)
                          C«r/d»cf) C(s std)
  94.2
108.54
 3.07J
  1003
  28.5
  1291
  36.6
    HA
    HA
    MA
    HA
    HA
Stack eas Uater Vapor Proportion     B(wo)    -  0.102
Molecular Height of Stack Cas. Ory   MCd)     «  29.S9
                              (let   H(s)     «  28.41
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)     P(s)     •  29.41
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)      V(s avg) •    20.1
02 Concentration (by CEM) X 8.2
C02 Concentration (by CEM) X 7.9
CO Concentration (fay CEM) X 0
112 Concentration (by diff.) X . ( 83.90 )
Swplc
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2

I
i
6
7
8



TOTALS
dClock (Velocity) Orifice
Tine (Head, dPJHeter.dH
(•in) j(in K20)j(in H20)
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11

0.11 | 1.4
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
0.11 j 1.4
0.11 j 1.4
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11

1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
Stack
Te»P
(degF)
136
136
136
136
136
137
137
• 137
137
137
137
• 137
137
137
137
137

	 , 	 , 	 , 	

176
[


%^
Eat Meter (SOUTCdP) (FIELC DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE •
Teap
in |
71 1
92 |
102 |
' 109 |
112 |
112 !
114 j
116
102
115
117
117
118
118
118
118
'

.... , — , —
1.76 | 22.4000
2187.0 | 1751.0
(degF) | ' |
out j ' (Velocity Head ("uc)
70
7*
77
82
87
88
90
92
92
93
94
95
95
96
96
97


0,3317
0.3317
0|.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
0.3317
OrSf ice Meter Reading ("uc)

Stack Teaperature (dee F)
(deg 0

Meter Tenperature (deg F)
(deo C)

Root-Hean-Square dP ("uej






0.3317 |
— 4-


1418.0 | 5.3066



                                                                                                              1A311000EM

                                                                                                              dP(evs)  »   0.110

                                                                                                              dH(avg)  •   1.400

                                                                                                              T(s avs) •   136.7
                                                                                                              T(s avg) •    58.2
                                                                                                              T(a> avg)
                                                                                                              T(« avg)
                                                                                       9».0
                                                                                       37.2
                                                                                                              I«KT(dP) «   0.332
                                                               344
-------
ISOKINI-TIC RESULTS
Plant:
Date:
IRF
11-05-91
Simple Location:


Updated
Printed
SCRUBBER

PARAMETER



Nozzle Diameter, Actual
\


11-11-91
01/09/92
EXIT



(in)
Pitot View Correction Factor
Cos Meter Correction Factor
Stack COuct) Dimensions
Performed by:
Test No. /Type:
Start/Stop Time:

SYMBOL VALUE
(calc.)
N(d) 0.375
C(p) 0.84
(alpha) 1
CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE * — 1B051047EM
R JACKSON
1B051047EH
1047-1353












 ( 116.16
VI (c) 447.34
V(u std) ( 21.056
N\A
N\A
M(p) ( ERR
X 8.1
X 7.5
X 0

.


)




>


























Isokineticity XI » 96.8
Hetered Sample Gas Volume (sef) V(w std) « 112.20
(SOB) V(B std) * 3.177
Stack Gas Flow, std cond. . (dscfm) Q(s) » . 919
std cond. (dsan/min)Q(s) « 26.0
actual (acfm) Q(a) « 1238
actual (acK/mtn) Q(a) « 35.1
Particulate Loading, dry (gr/dscf) C(* std) * NA
a 7X 02(gr/dscf)-C(s ctd) * NA
a 7X 02(ng/dscm) C(s std) • NA
Particulate Emission Rate (Ib/hr) E(p) * HA
(kg/hr) E(p) « HA

Stack Gas Water Vapor Proportion 8(wo) » 0.158
Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry M(d) » 29.52
Wet M(s) « 27.70
Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg) P(s) » 29.98
Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec) V(s avg) * 19.3





•





X ( 84.40 )
Stack
Temp
(degF)
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
141
141
141
141
141
141
141
141


	
Gas
Temp
in
74
83
94
100
107
109
109
109
102
107
109
111
112
106
107
112



22.4000 I 2248.0 | 1651.0
Meter (SORT(dP) JFIELD'OATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE * -- 1BOS1047EM
(degF)

out
74 0.3162
74
78
82
87
90
93
94
93
94
94
95
96
94
94
95
0.3162

Velocity Head ("we) dP(avg) * 0.100
1-
Orifice Meter Reading ("we) dH(avg) > 1.400

0.3162 jstack Temperature (deg F) f(s avg) = 140.5
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162
0.3162



1427.0
5.0596
(deg C) T(s avg) » 60.3

Meter Temperature (deg F) TOa avg) « 96.2
(deg C) T(m avg) * 35.7

Root-Mean-Square dP ("we) SORT(dP) « 0.316


!



•


345
-------
1SOK1NET1C RESULTS
Plant:  1RF       Updated  11-11-91
Bate:   11-06-91  Printed  01/09/92
       Location:  SCRUBBER EXIT
                                                                         CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAHPLE * ™  1W61057EM
                                 Perfonaed by:      R JACKSON
                                 Te*t No./Type:     1B061057EH
                                 Start/Stop Ti«e:   1057-1358
                           laokineticity
                           Ketered Sasple Caa Volt
PARAMETER
                 \
Haute OiaMtir.  Actual (in)
Pltot Tube Correction Factor
CM M*tcr Correction Factor
Stack (Duct) Dimensions (in):    •
        Radius (if  round)
        Length (if  rectangular)
        Width  (if rectangular)
Area of Stack  (sq ft)

• of Saople Point*
Total Sampling TiM («5n)
laroattric Pressure (in Ha)
Stack PfMturt (in H20)
Cat Kattr Initial Reading (cu ft)
Cat Httcr Final Reading (cu ft)
Mat Ca*' Sanple Voluue (cu ft)

Vol of Liquid Collected (ml)
Val of Liq a  Std. Goods. («cf )
Ut. of Filter Paniculate (go)
Ut. of Probe  Wash Paniculate (gm)
 Ut of Combined Paniculate (got)
                                   SYMBOL

                                  H(d)
                                  C(p)
                                  (alpha)
 VALUE
 (calc.)
  0.375
   0.84
      1
                                  L
                                  U
                                  A(S)

                                  *
                                  (theta)
                                  P(b)
                                  P(stack)
Stack Gas Flow,  ctd cond.
                •td cond.
                actual
                actual
Paniculate Leading.  dry  	
                   8 » 02{gr/dsef) CCc std)
                   8 7* 02(Be/dtc*)> CC» «td)
Paniculate {Mission Rate  (tb/hr)   CCp)
                           (kg/hr)   ECp>
          X I
(ccf)     V<« atd)
(sen)     V(« std)
(dccfa)   0
(aca/aiin) G{s>
(gr/dtef) C(e ctd)
                                  V(m)
(1.06901 )

      16
C 176.00 )
   30.22
      -5
   8.107
 128.818
( 120.71 >
Stack Gas Water Vapor Proportion     8(«o)
Molecular Weight of Stack 6as. Dry   M(d)
                               Net   H(S>
Stack Pressure, absolute (in He)     P(s)
Average Stack Velocity (ft/see)      V(s avg)
                                                  96.5
                                                115.16
                                                 3.261
                                                   946
1304
  NA
  HA
  HA
  NA
  HA
                       0.177
                       29.52
                       27.48
                       29.85
                        2D.3
                                   VI (0     ' 526.53
                                   V(u std)  ( 24.784
                                            N\A
                                            H\A
                                   M(p)
                                                ERR  )
02 Concentration (by CEH) X 8-3
C02 Concentration (by CEM) . X 7.4
CO Concentration (by CEH) X 0
K2 Concentration (by diff.) X ( 84.30 ) ;

dClock (Velocity! Orifice
Point 1 Time JHead, dPJMeter.dH
| (mln) |{in H20)|(in H20)
1
2
3
4
5
7
•
8
2
3
4
5

7
8
....
11
11
11
11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
11 0.11
11 0.11
11 0.11
11 0.11
11 0.11
11 0.11
11
11

..
11
- 11

0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
staek c,s Meter (SORT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGts fo* SMUT* * -- MM..—*-
Tenp Tcap
(degF) in
"out 1 * (Velocity Head ("«» *<«"8> - «>-"0
	 + — «— 1
138 69 69 0.3317 jorifice Meter Reading («ne> dH(ave) • 1.500
138
138
138
1.5 138
1.5 138
1.5 138
1.5 138
1.5 138
1.5 138
1.5 138
1.5 138
1.5 138
1.5
1.5
1.5
I— •
— i— -
138
138
138
86 71 0.3317 |
94 76 0.3317 |
106 81 0.3317
115
118
120
119
110
116
123
123
86 0.3317
90 0.3317
93 0.3317
96 0.3317
97 0.3317
97 0^3317
99 0.3317
99 OJ3317
120 | 100 0.3317
118
117
116
I 	
100 0.3317
100 0.3317
100 0.3317
....... * 	 1 	
Staek Tesperature (deg F3 T(« avg) - 138.0
(dee Q t(s avg) - 58.9
Meter Teaperature (dee FJ Urn avg) - 160.8
(dee O T(» avg) - 38.2
Root-Mean-Square dP ("«> «Q«T(dP> « (1.332








TOTALS
            176
                       1.76 |  24.0000 I   2208.0  | 1772.0  | 1454.0 |  5^066
                                                                  346
-------
ISOKINETIC RESULTS
Plant:  1RF       Updated   11-11-91  Performed by:      R JACKSON
Date:   11-07-91   Printed   01/09/92  Test No./Type:     1B071010EM
Staple Location:   SCRUBBER  EXIT      Start/Stop Time:   1010-1315

PARAMETER
Nozzle Oianeter, Actual  
Ut of Combined Particulate (gn)
                                                                          CALCULATED RESULTS FOR SAMPLE # —   1B071010EM
                                      Isokineticity
                                      Hetered Sample Gas Volume
SYMBOL

N(d)
C(p)
(alpha)
R
L
U
A(s)
*
(theta)
P(b)
P(stack)


V(m)
VALUE
(cale.)
0.375
0.84
1
7
	
....
(1.06901 )
16
( 176.00 )
30.02
•5
128.339
248.911 .
( 120.57 )
                                      Stack Gas Flow, std cond.
                                                     std cond.
                                                     actual
                                                     actual
                                      Particulate Loading,  dry
                                                         a 7% 02Cgr/dscf) C(s std)
                                                         a 7X 02(ng/dscn) C(s std)
                                      Particulat* Em's*ion Rate  (Ib/hr)   E(p)
                                                                (kg/hr)   E(p)
          X I
(scf)   *  V(m std)
(sea)     V(m std)
(dscfm)   Q(s)
(dsc«/oin)0(s)
(acta)    0(a)
(an/Bin)  0(a)
(gr/dscf)  C(s std)
  95.5
115.19
 3.262
   956
  27.1
  1379
  39.0
    HA
    NA
    NA
    NA
    NA
                                      Stack Gas Hater vapor Proportion
                                      Molecular Weight of Stack Gas, Dry
                                                                    Wet
                                      Stack Pressure, absolute (in Hg)
                                      Average Stack Velocity (ft/sec)
          S(HO)
          M(d)
          M(s)
          P(s)
          V(s avg)
Vl(c)      630.73
V(u std) ( 29.688 >
          N\A
          N\A
M(p)     (    ERR >
02  Concentration (by CEM)           %            6.6
COS Concentration (by CEM)           X.            7.4
CO  Concentration (by CEM)           X              0
N2  Concentration (by diff.)         X        (  86.00  )
Sample I dClock (Velocity) Orifice
Point | Tine (Head, dP
Meter, dH
1 (Bin) j (in H20)|(in H20)
1 | 11
2 | 11
3 I «
* I 11
5 1 11
6 | 11
7 I 11
8 1 11
1 I "
2 I 11
3 I 11
* J 11
0.12 1.6
0.12 1.6
0.12 1.6
0.12 1.6
0.12 1.6
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
.0.12
0.12
5 | 11 0.12
6 J 11 0.12
7 | 11 0.12
8 i 11 0.12
i| 	
r
I —
TOTALS I 176
1.92
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6

	
....
25.6000
Stack
Temp
(degF)
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140



2240.0
Gas Meter (SQRT(dP) (FIELD DATA AVERAGES FOR SAMPLE *
Temp (degF)
in
69
88
101
110
111
116
113
112
97
108
110
112
112
112
113
112



1696.0
out
70
71
75
82
87
91
92
93
90
90
91
91
92
92
92
92
....


1391.0
I

0.3464
Velocity Head ("uc)
Orifice Meter Reading ("we)
0.3464 j
0.3464 (Stack Temperature (deg F)
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
0.3464
(deg C)

Meter Temperature (deg F)
(deg C)

Root-Mean-Square dP (Hwc>






0.3464




5.5426
                                                                          T(s avg) *
                                                                          T(s avg) =

                                                                          T(a avg) *
                                                                          T(» avg) >

                                                                          SORT(dP) *
 0.205
 29.45
 27.10
 29.65
  21.5
                                                                                                               1B071010EM

                                                                                                               dP(avg)  «   0.120

                                                                                                               dH(avg)  =   1 .600
                                                                                                                            140.0
                                                                                                                            60.0

                                                                                                                            96.5
                                                                                                                            35.8

                                                                                                                            0.346
                                                             347
-------
           APPENDIX D-4




CASCADE IMPACTOR TRAIN WORKSHEETS
                348
-------
                      Bofors-Nobel
                   Cascade Impactor Data
Plants IRP
Date:  10-24-91
Sample location: AFTERBURNER
Performed by:   ED HILL c-------
                      Bofors-Nobel
                   Cascade Impactor Data
Plant: ZRF
Dates  10-29-91
Sample location: AFTERBURNER
Performed by:   ED HILL
Test No./Type:  1A2911SSAA
Start/Stop Timo:llSS-1432
 Sampling Data
Run Time-
Vm-
Pb-
T«-
TC-
Tm-
Delta h-
Delta p»
Dn-
% Isokin-
Imp CFH»
DSCFM-
Vin(etd)-
144
86.46
30.1
20.14
264
106.7
1.4
0.08
0.497
103.2
0.81
0.5644 .
81.28
scage
1
2
3
* 4
5
6
7
8
Backup
Total


eaten {cjm)
0.1221
0.0022
0.0028
0.0032
0.0108
0.0492
0.1209
0.0661
0.249
0.6263


i *
19.5
0.4
0.4
045
1.7
! 7.9
! 19.3
1 10.6
i 39.8
100.0
|

                      Bofors-Nobel
                   Cascade Impactor Data
     Cum. %
   Less Than
    ECD
(micron*)
80.5
80.2
79.7
79.2
77.5-
69.6
50.3
39.8
0.0
8.7
7.3
4.9
3.3
2.1
1.1
0.7
0.4
0.30
Plant: IRF
Date:  10-29-91
Sample location: SCRUBBER EXIT
Performed by:   R JACKSON C*-
Test No./Type:  1&291158EA
Start/Stop Time:1158-lS21
Sampling Data
Run Time-
Vm«!
Pb-
T««
TC-
Tm-
Delta h*
Delta p»
Dn-
% Iiokin-
Imp CFH»
DSCFM-
Vm(»td)-
198
67.07
30.1
133.8
254
99.1
0.31
0.12
0.248
103.0
0.52
0.3187
63.11
-------
                      Bofors-Nobel
                   Cascade Impactor Data
Plant: IRF
Date:  10-31-91
Sample location: AFTERBURNER
Performed by:   ED HILL
Test No./Type:  1A311000AA
Start/Stop Time:1000-1246
 Sampling Data
Run Time=
Vm=
Pb=
Ts=
Tc=
Tm=
Delta h=
Delta p=
Dn=
% Isokin=
Imp CFM=
DSCFM=
Vm(std)=
156
91.58
29.78
2011
277
105.6
1.4
0.08
0.497
103.6
0.84
0.5472
85.36
stage
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Backup
Total


catcn(gm}
0.0173
0.0068
0.0083
0.0086
0.0221
0.2048
0.1836 •
0.051
0.3635
0..866


*
2.0
0.8
1.0
1.0
2.6
23.6
21.2
5.9
42.0
100.0


                      Bofors-Nobel
                   Cascade Impactor Data
Cum. %
Less








Than
9S.O
97.2
96.3
95.3
92.7
69.1
47.9
42.0
                                                         0.0
                       ECD
                   (microns)

                        8.4
                        7.2
                        4.9
                        3.3
                        2.1
                        1.0
                        0.6
                        0.4
                    ;   0.30
Plant: IRF
Date:  10-31-91
Sample location: SCRUBBER EXIT
Performed by:   R JACKSON
Test No./Type:  1A311040EA
Start/Stop Time:1040-1336
 Sampling Data
Run Time=
Vm=
Pb=
Ts=
Tc=
Tm=
Delta h=
Delta p=
Dn=
% lsokin=
Imp CFM=
DSCFM=
Vm(std)=
143
42.1
29.78.
136.8
254
70.7
0.29
0.11
0.248
92.9
0.44
0.2887
41.29
stage
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 '
8
Backup
Total


catcn(gm)
0.0061
0.0008
0.0013
0.003
0.004
0.0075
0.011
0.0198
0.0104
0.0639


*
9.5
1.3
2.0
4.7
6.3
11.7
17.2
31.0
16.3
100.0


     Cum. %
   Less Than
                                                        90.5
                                                        89.2
                                                        87.2
                                                        82.5
                                                        76.2
                                                        64.5
                                                        47.3
                                                        16.3
                                                         0.0
    ECD
(microns)

    11.8.
     9.8
     6.6
     4.5
     2.9
     1.5
     0.9
     0.6
    0.30
                                  351
-------
                      Boforn-Nobel    ;
                   Cascade Impactor Data
Plant: IRF
Date:  11-05-91
Sample location: AFTERBURNER
                                            Performed by:    ED
                                            Test No./Type:   1B05.104SAA
                                            Start/Stop Time:1045-1328
Sampling
Run Time'
Vm«
Pb-
T««
Tc*
Tm«
Delta h=
Delta p-
Dn-
% laoktn-
Imp CFM-
DSCFM-
Vm(std)-
r,Data
156
93.93
30.35
2033
273
96.2
1.4
0.08
0.497
108.5
0.87
0.5815
90.72

Stage
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Backup
Total


atch f flrn\
Abwii | y***!
0.0105
0.0006
0.0005
0.0003
0.0008
0.0024
0.0012
0.0016
0.03
0.0479


%

21.9
1 A* w
1.0
i 0.6
i 1'7
i 5.0
i 2.5
3.3
' 62.6
100.0


                                                  Cum. %
                                                Leas Than
                       Bofors-Nobel
                    Cascade  Impactor Data
                                                        78.1
                                                        76.8
                                                        75.8
                                                        75.2
                                                        73.5
                                                        68.5
                                                        66.0
                                                        62.6
                                                         0.0
                                                                    ECD
                                                                (microns)

                                                                     8.4
                                                                     7.2
                                                                     4.9
                                                                     3.3
                                                                     2.1
                                                                     1.0
                                                                     0.6
                                                                     0.4
                                                                    0.30
Plant: IRF
Date:  11-05-91
Sample location: SCRUBBER EXIT
                                             Performed by:   R JftCKSON <•*-
                                             Teat No./Type:  1BOS1047E&
                                             Start/Stop Time:1047-1353
  Sampling Data
                    Stage   Catch(gm)
Run Time*
Vm»
Pb-
TS-
Tc««
Tm»
Delta h»
Delta p-
Dn-
% I«okin«
Imp CFM»
DSCFM-
Vm(«td)»
" 176
51.99
30.35
140.5
253
77.9
0.27
0.10
0.248
101.5
0.47
0.2911
51.25

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Backup
Total



0.0068
' 0
0
0
0.0002
0.0001
0
0.0003
0.0104
0.0178



\ 38.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
; o.e
! o.o
1.7
58.4
100.0


                                                  Cum. %
                                                Less Than
    ECD
(microns)
61.8
61.8
61.8
61.8
60.7
60.1
60.1
58.4
0.0
11.8
9.8
6.6
4.5
2.9
l.S
0.9
0.6
0.30
                                   352
-------
                      Bofors-Nobel
                   Cascade Impactor Data
Plant: IRF
Date:  11-06-91
Sample location: AFTERBURNER
                                             Performed by:   ED HILL
                                             Test No./Type:  1B061100AA
                                             Start/Stop Time:1100-1339
 Sampling Data
Run Time=
Vm=
Pb=
Ts=
Tc=
Tm=
Delta h=
Delta p=
Dn=
% Isokin=
Imp CPM=
DSCFM=
Vm(std)=
156
96.15
30.22
2042
268
91.5
1.4
0.08
0.497
108.4
0.85
0.5978
93.26
acage
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Backup
Total


uatcnjgraj
0.0037
0.001
0.0032
0.0006
0.0012
0.001
0.0012
0.001
0.03
0.0429


«
8.6
2.3
7.5
1.4
2.8
2.3
2.8
2.3
69.9
100.0


                      Bofors-Nobel
                   Cascade Impactor Data
                                                  Cum. %
                                                Less Than
                                                        91.4
                                                        89.0
                                                        81.6
                                                        80.2
                                                        77.4
                                                        75.1
                                                        72.3
                                                        69.9
                                                         0.0
    BCD
(microns)

     8.4
     7.2
     4.9
     3.3
     2.1
     1.0
     0.6
     0.4
    0.30
Plant: IRF
Date:  11-06-91
Sample location: SCRUBBER EXIT
                                             Performed by:   R JACKSON
                                             Test No./Type:  1B061057EA
                                             Start/Stop Time:1057-1358
 Sampling Data
                   Stage   Catch(gm)
Run Time=
Vm=
Pb=
Ts=
Tc=
Tm=
Delta h=
Delta p=
Dn=
% Isokin=
Imp CFM=
DSCFM=
Vm(std)=
176
53.71
30.22
138
254
73.4
0.3
0.11
0.248
101.7
0.50
0.3022
53.18

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Backup
Total



0;003
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0031
0.0061



49.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.8
100.0


                                                 • Cum. %
                                                Less Than
                                                        50.8
                                                        50.8
                                                        50.8
                                                        50.8
                                                        50.8
                                                        50.8
                                                        50.8
                                                        50.8
                                                         0.0
    ECD
(microns)

    11.1
     9.3
     6.3
     4.3
     2.7
     1.4
     0.9
     0.6
    0.30
                                 353
-------
                      Bofors-Nobel
                   Cascade Impactor
Plant: IRF
Dates  11-07-91
Sample location: AFTERBURNER
Data
         Performed by:   ED HILL
         Test No./Type:  1B071017AA
         Start/Stop Time:1017-1257
 Sampling Data
Run Timet»
Vm»
Pb»
Ta»
Tc»
Tm«
Delta h»
Delta p-
Dn=
% Isokin-
Imp CFM=
• DSCFM"
Vm(std)=
156 .
84.62
30.02
2046
266
89.9
1.4
0.08
0.497
101.8
0.81
0.5242
81.77
stacje
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Backup
Total


ua&cnigmj
0.0224
0.0023
0.0028
0.0012
0.0019
0.0013
0.0011
0.0009
0.0079
0.0418


*
53.6
5.5
; 6.7
2.9
4.5
1 3.1
2.6
| 2.2
| 18.9
100.0


                      Bofors-Nobel   ;
                   Cascade Impactor Data
              Cum. %
            Less Than
                                                        46.4
                                                        40.9
                                                        34.2
                                                        31.3
                                                        26.8
                                                        23.7
                                                        21.1
                                                        18.9
                                                         0.0
    BCD
(microns)

     8.7
     7.3
     5.0
     3.3
     2.1
     1.1
     0.7
     0.4
    0.30
Plant: IRF
Dates  11-07-91
Sample location: SCRUBBER EXIT
         Performed by:   R JACKSON <
         Test No./Type:  1B071010EA
         Start/Stop Time:1010-1315
 Sampling Data
Run Time*
Vra-
Pb-
Ttaij@
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Backup
Total


\«C& I. Wii I ^Ul J
0.0031
0.0004
0.0002
0
0.0002
0.0001
0.0002
0
0.0006
0.0048


•o
64.6
8.3
4.2
0.0
4.2
2.1
4.2
0.0
12.5
100.0


Cum.
%
Less Than








35.4
27.1
22.9
22.9
18.7
16.7
12.5
12.5
                                                         0.0
                                ECD
                            (microns)

                                11.1
                                 9.3
                                 6.3
                                 4.3
                                 2.7
                                 1.4
                                 0.9
                                 0.6
                                0.30
                                   354
-------
    APPENDIX E




DISTRIBUTIONS WORKSHEETS
       355
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60


B
****** *************«*******XAAAAAAlAAAAAAJiaA
Test Number:
Date of Test:

Total Material Fed (kg):
Feed Duration (hr):
Feedrate (kg/hr):
Kiln Ash Weight (kg):
Kiln Ash Fraction (X of naterial fed) :

Total Fed DuringVpue 6as Sampling (kg):
Sampling Duration (hr):
Feedrate During Sampling (kg/hr):

C

D .

EI
i
1 Lagoon Sludge 3
10/24/91

251
4.33
57.8
49
19.5

173
2.82
62

F
gfr*aK*&aa<

e
>********<

H

I
ft**lfc*ttK**l

J
fr*******

BOFORS-NOBEL SUPERFUNO SITE TESTS
! TRACE HETALS DATA
1

553
260
128
108


382
169
136

Arsenic

Total Feed Analysis for Hetals
Integrated Feed Concentration (rag/kg) Avg:
Hetals Feedrate (mg/hr):
Total Metal Fed (mg):
Feedrate During Flue Gas Sampling (mg/hr):

Kiln Ash Analysis for Hetals
Ash Concentration (mg/kg):
Total in Ash (mg):

Scrubber Exit MS Hetals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PU (ug):
Total In Train (rag/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscn):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):

Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L):
Total 1n Scrubber Liquor (mg):

HI

1.4
81
351
86


12
585


0.05
120
0.157
0.053
91

0.43
610

LO

1.4
81
351
86


12
585


0.00
120
0.120
0.040
69

0.43
610


Ob)l
(min)
(Ib/hr)
Ob);
j

db)
(min)
(Ib/hr)


Multiple
Scrubber
Scrubber
Scrubber
Flue 6as


K
•
L

05-Oct-92
ANALYSIS

Hetals Flue Gas
Inpinger
Impinger
Charge
Volume
H5 Gas Sampled
Flowrate


Sampling
(nL)r
(nO.):
(dscm):
(dscm/hr):


Total Liquor Collected (L):



Barium •
HI
I
i17
'983
4260
1046
i

i 42
2048
I
1 '
0.049
|20
0:045
0:015
26
i
0.20
1284
i
LO

17
983
4260
1046


42
2048


0.049
0
0.025
0.008
14

0.20
284





ft******

Cadmium
HI

11
636
2757
677


2.3
112


0.022
440
0.456
0.153
264

0.47
667

LO

11
636
2757
677


2.3
112


0.017
440
0.452
0.152
262

0.47
667







Train Data
200
730
2.977
1722

1420

'«•*****<

Chromium
HI

28
1619
7017
1722


79
3852


0.01
81
0.088
0.030
51

0.29
412

LO

28
1619
7017
1722


79
3852


0.00
81
0.081
0.027
«7

0.29
; 412




28.7

375

t***»***fl




(dsicm/mln)

(gal)

I**********

Lead
HI

470
27182
117787
28913


30
1463


0.31
13000
13.226
4.443
7651

12
17034

LO

470
27182
117787
26913


30
1463


0.21
13000
13.153
4.418
7608

12
17034

Hetal Discharge Distribution (X of Metal Fed) . [
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Kiln/Scrubber Closure:

166.8
105.1
174.0
445.9

166.8
80.6
174.0
421.3

48.1
}t.S
6.1
57.2

48.1
1.4
6.7
56.1

4.1
39.0
24.2
67.3

4.1
38.7
24.2
66.9

54.9
3.0
5.9
63.7

54.9
2.7
5.9
63.5

1.2
26.5
14.5
42.2

1.2
26.3
14.5
42.0

Normalized Ketal Distribution (X of Measured)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Exit Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Total :

Apparent Scrubber Efficiency:


Scrubber Exit MS Hetals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined F11ter/PW (ug):
Total In Train (rag/train):
Flue 6as Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):


37
24
39
100

62
Hondetects
Antimony

0.1
30
0.103
0.035
60


40
19
41
100

84
: 4
' 12
100

68 73
86
2
12
100

83
6
58
36
100

38
set to detection limits
Beryllium


1
0.002


0.5
0.002




0.001

i
i
356
i
i
1
\
1




Selenium

0.2
50
0.196
0.066
113


6
SB
36
100

38










86
5
9
100

66

Silver

0.01
3
0.010
0.003
6.0


86
4
9
100

68










3
63
34
100

35










3
63
34
100

35










-------
1                     B
2 *********************************************
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
                                 Test  Number:
                                                     2 Lagoon Sludge 3 BOFORS-NOBEL SUPERFUND SITE TESTS
                                                                                                                       05-Oct-92
                                Date  of Test:  10/29/91
                                                                      TRACE METALS DATA ANALYSIS
                Total  Material  Fed (kg):
                     Feed Duration (hr):
                       Feedrate (kg/hr):
                   Kiln Ash Weight (kg):
  Kiln Ash Fraction (X of material fed):

Total Fed During Flue Gas Sampling (kg):
                 Sampling Duration (hr):
                                                   272
                                                 4.58
                                                 59.3
                                                    51
                                                 18.8
599 (lb)    Multiple Metals Flue Gas Sampling Train Data
275 (min)   Scrubber Impinger Charge (mL):       200
131 (Ib/hr) Scrubber Impinger Volume (mL):    •   610
113 (lb)    Scrubber MS Gas Sampled (dscm):   3.260
            Flue Gas Flowrate (dscm/hr):       1770     29.5 (dscm/min)
                                                   187     413  (lb)    Total  Liquor Collected  (L):
                                                  3.08   184.5  (min)
                                                  60.9     134  (Ib/hr)
                                                                                                         1514
                                                         400 (gal)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61

Total Feed Analysis, for Metals
Integrated Feed Concentration (mg/kg) Avg:
Metals Feedrate (mg/hr):
Total Metal Fed (mg):
Feedrate During Flue Gas Sampling (mg/hr):

Kiln Ash Analysis for Metals
Ash Concentration (mg/kg):
Total in Ash (mg):

Scrubber Exit MS Metals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PU (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr) :

Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L):
Total in Scrubber Liquor (mg):

Metal Discharge Distribution (X of Metal Fed)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Kiln/Scrubber Closure:

Normalized Metal Distribution (X of Measured)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Exit Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Total :

Apparent Scrubber Efficiency:
Arsenic
HI LO

1.4
83
380
85


7.8
398


0.05
40
0.071
0.022
38

0.32
485


104.6
44.9
127.4
276.9


38
16
46
100


1.4
83
•380
85


7.8
398


0.00
0
0.000
0.000
0

0.32
485


104.6
0.0
127.4
232.0


45
0
55
100

74 100
Barium
HI LO

17
1008
4619
1036


47
2398


0.051
20
0.040
0.012
22

0.130
197


51.9
2.1
4.3
58.3


89
4
7
100

67

17
1008
4619
1036


47
2398


0.051
0
0.020
0.006
11

0.130
197


51.9
1.0
4.3
57.2


91
2
7
100

80
Cadmium
HI LO

11
652
2989
670


2.4
122


0.005
540
0.543
0.167
295

0.420
636


4.1
44.0
21.3
69.4


6
63
31
100

33.



Nondetects





11
652
2989
670


2.4
122


0.000
540
0.540
0.166
293

0.420
636


4.1
43.8
21.3
69.1


6
63
31
100

33
*******

i**»*»fc**i**»«»
Chromium
HI LO

28
1660
7608
1706


63
3215


0.01
34
0.040
0.012
22

0.25
379


42.3
1.3
5.0
48.5


87
3
10
100

80



28
1660
7608
1706


63
3215


0.00
34
0.034
0.010
18

0.25
379


42.3
1.1
5.0
48.3


87
; 2
: 10
100

. 82

Lead
HI LO

470
27862
127700
28633


. 29
1480


0.1
15000
15.061
4.620
8177

24.00
36340


1.2
28.6
28.5
58.2


2
49
49
100

50


470
27862
127700
28633


29
1480


0.0
15000
15.000
4.601
8144

24.00
36340


1.2
28.4
28.5
58.1


2
49
49
100

.50
k**********

set to detection limits
Antimony
Scrubber Exit MS Metals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PU (ug):.
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):

0.1
40
0.101
0.031
55






Beryllium

0.002
0.8
0.002
0.001
1.1







Selenium

0.2
80
0.202
0.062
110







Silver

0.01
4
0.010
0.003
5.5





















                                                               357
-------
1 B

3 Test Number:
4 Date of Test:
5
6 Total Material Fed (kg):
7 Feed Duration (hr):
8 ' Feedrate (kg/hr):
9 Kiln Ash Weight (kg):
10 Kiln Ash Fraction (X of material fed):
11
12 Total Fed During Flue Gas Sampling (kg):
13 . Sampling Duration (hr):
14 Feedrate During Sampling (kg/hr):
16
17
19 Total Feed Analysis for Hetals
20 Integrated Feed Concentration (mg/kg) Avg:
21 Ketals Feedrate (mg/hr):
22 Total Metal Fed (rag):
23 Feedrate During Flue Gas Sampling (mg/hr):
24
25 Kiln Ash Analysis for Hetals
26 Ash Concentration (mg/kg):
27 Total In Ash (mg):
28
29 Scrubber Exit H5 Ketals Train
30 Combined Implnger Concentration (mg/L):
31 Combined Filter/PV (ug):
32 Total in Train (mg/train):
33 Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
34 Emission Rate (mg/hr):
35
36 Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L):
37 Total in Scrubber Liquor (mg):
38
C
.AltAAAAAAA
3
10/31/91

244
4.25
57.5
50
20.6

169
2.93
58
D El F G H I
.
Lagoon Sludge 3 BOFORS-NOBEL SUPERFUND SITE TESTS
i TRACE METALS DATA ANALYSIS
1
539 (Ib) ! Multiple Metals Flue Gas Sampling
255 (min) Scrubber Implnger Charge (ml):
127 (Ib/hr) Scrubber Impinger Volume (ml):
111 (Ib) Scrubber MS Gas Sampled (dscm):
i Flue Gas Flowrate (dscm/hr):
|
374 (Ib) Total Liquor Collected (L):
176 (min)
127 (Ib/hr)
J




Train
200
550
3.073
1710

1136


Arsenic j Barium Cadmium Chromium
HI

1.4
81
342
81


8.3
418


0.05
200
0.228
0.074
127

0.074
84

39 Ketal Discharge Distribution (X of Metal Fed)
40 Kiln Ash:
41 Scrubber Flue Gas:
42 Scrubber Liquor:
43 Kiln/Scrubber Closure:

44
122.1
. 156.6
24.6
303.2


LO [HI LO HI LO HI
I
f
1.4 117 17 11 11 28
81 978 978 633 633 1611
342 4156 4156 2689 2689 6846
81 982 ' 982 635 635 1617
i

8.3 38 38 1.9 1.9 59
418 1913 1913 96 96 '2971
1
1
0.00 0.053 0.053 0.005 0.000 0.01
0 1 18 18 630 630 32
0.000 0.036 0.036 0.633 0.630 0.038
0.000 0.012 0.012 0.206 0.205 0.012
0 20 20 352 351 21
1
f
0.000 0.060 0.000 0.033 0.033 0.017
0 68 0 37 37 19
1
|
122.1 46.0 46.0 3.6 3.6 43.4
0.0 2.0 2.0 55.4 55.2 1.3
0.0 1.6 0.0 1.4 1.4 0.3
122.1 49.7 48.1 60.4 60.1 45.0
f

LO

28
1611
6846
1617


59
2971


0.00
32
0.032
0.010
18

0.017
19


43.4
1.1
0.3
44.8


K L

05-Oct-92


Data



28.5 (dscm/min)

300 (gal)


Lead
HI LO

470 470
27037 27037
114909 114909
27145 27145


29 29
1460 1460


0.1 0.0
19000 19000
19.055 19.000
6.201 6.183
10603 10573

7.6 7.0
8631 ' 7949


1.3 1.3
39.1 38.9
7.5 6.9
47.8 47.1


45 Normalized Hetal Distribution (X of Measured) i .
46 Kiln Ash:
47 Scrubber Exit Flue Gas:
48 Scrubber Liquor:
49 Total :
50
51 Apparent Scrubber Efficiency:

53
54
55
56 Scrubber Exit H5 Hetals Train
57 Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
58 Combined Filter/PW (ug):
59 Total 1n Train (mg/train):
60 Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
61 Emission Rate (mg/hr):
40
52
8
100

14


100 93 96 6 6 97
0 | 4 4 92 92 3
0 ; 3 0 2 2 1
100 100 100 100 100 100
i
ERR ! 45 0 2 2 18
i
1
97
2
1
100

20


3 3
82 83
16 15
100 100

16 15,


Nondetects set to detection limits
Antimony

0.1
200
0.255
0.083
142
Beryllium Selenium Silver
j
0.002 0.2 0.01
0.8 400 20
0.002 . D.510 0.026
0.001 0.166 0.008
i.l 284' 14.2














358
-------
1
2 '
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
********* *
Test Number: 3 Lagoon Sludge 3 BOFORS-NOBEL SUPERFUND SITE TESTS 05-Oct-92
Date of Test: 10/31/91 TRACE METALS DATA ANALYSIS
Total Material Fed (kg): 244 539 (Ib) Multiple Metals Flue Gas Sampling Train Data
Feed Duration (hr): 4.25 255 (rain) Scrubber Impinger Charge (mL): 200
Feedrate (kg/hr): 57.5 127 (lb/hr) Scrubber Impinger Volume (mL): 550
Kiln Ash Weight (kg):
Kiln Ash Fraction (X of material fed):

Total Fed During Flue Gas Sampling (kg):
Sampling Duration (hr):
Feedrate During Sampling (kg/hr):

50
20.6

169
2.93
58

111
(Ib) Scrubber
Flue Gas

374
176
127

Arsenic

Total Feed Analysis for Metals
Integrated Feed Concentration (mg/kg) Avg:
Metals Feedrate (mg/hr):
Total Metal Fed (mg):
Feedrate During Flue Gas Sampling (mg/hr):

Kiln Ash Analysis for Metals
Ash Concentration (mg/kg }:
Total in Ash (mg):

Scrubbisr Exit MS Metals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PU (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):

Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L):
Total in Scrubber Liquor (mg):

Metal Discharge Distribution (X of Metal Fed)
' Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Kiln/Scrubber Closure:

Normalized Metal Distribution (X of Measured)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Exit Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Total :

Apparent Scrubber Efficiency:


MIDI

1.4
81
342
81


8.3
418


0.05
200
0.228
0.074
127

0.000
0


122.1
156.6
0.0
278.7


44
56
0
100

0


Nondetects
MID2

1.4
81
342
81


8.3
418


0.00
0
0.000
0.000
0

0.074
84


122.1
0.0
24.6
146.6


83
0
17
100

100




MS Gas Sampled (dscm):
Flowrate

(dscm/hr) :


(Ib) Total Liquor Collected (L):
(rain)
(lb/hr)
*"*



Barium
MIDI

17
978
4156
• 982


38
1913


0.053
18
0.036
0.012
20

0.000
0


46.0
2.0
0.0
48.1


96
4
0
100

0


HID2

17
978
4156
982


38
1913


0.053
18
0.036
0.012
20

0.060
68


46.0
2.0
1.6
49.7


93
4
3
100

•45








Cadmium
HI

11
633
2689
635


1.9
96


0.005
630
0.633
0.206
352

0.033
37


3.6
55.4
1.4
60.4


6
92
2
100

2


LO

11
633
2689
635


1.9
96


0.000
630
0.63Q
0.205
351

0.033
37


3.6
55.2
1.4
60.1


6
92
2
100

2





3.073
1710

1136

*********

Chromi urn
HI

28
1611
6846
1617


59
2971


0.01
32
0.038
0.012
21

0.017
19


43.4
1.3
0.3
45.0


97
3
1
100

18


LO

28
1611
6846
1617


59
2971


0.00
32
0.032
0.010
18

0:.017
' 19

i
43.4
• 1.1.
0.3
44.8


97
, 2
1
100

20



28.5

300




(dscm/min)

(gal)

**********

Lead
MIDI

470
27037
114909
27145


29
1460


0.1
19000
19.055
6.201
10603

7.0
7949


1.3
39.1
6.9
47.3


3
83
15
100

15


MID2

470
27037
114909
27145


29
1460


0.0
19000
19.000
6.183
10573

7.6
8631


1.3
38.9
7.5
47.7


3
82
16
100

16


set to detection limits
Antimony
Scrubber Exit MS Metals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PW (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):

0.1
200
0.255
0.083
142






Beryllium

0.002
0.8
0.002
0.001
1.1







Selenium

0.2
400
0.510
0.166
284







Silver

0.01
20
0.026
0,008
14.2

•



















359
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1A
JO
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
B
********** ******•*.**************************
Test Number:
Date of Test:

Total Material Fed (kg):
Feed Duration (hr):
Feedrate (kg/hr):
Kiln Ash Weight (kg):
Kiln Ash Fraction (X of material fed):

C
4
11/05/91

236
4.17
56.6
90
38.2

D
E ;
Lagoon Sludge 8
F
G
H
I
BOFORS-NOBEL SUPERFUND SITE TESTS
TRACE HETALS DATA

520
250
125
199


i
Ob)
(min)i
(lb/h}r)
(lb)



Multiple
Scrubber
Scrubber
Scrubber
Flue Gas


J

K

L
****.•******
Q5-()ct-92
ANALYSIS

Hetals Flue Gas
Impi nger
Impinger
Charge
Volume
MS Gas .Sampled
Flpwrate


Sampling
(mL): ,
(mL):
(dscm) :
(dscm/hr) :


. i Total Liquor Collected (L):




Total Feed Analysis for Metals
Feed Concentration (mg/kg) :
Hetals Feedrate (mg/hr):
Total Hetal Fed (ing}:

Kiln Ash Analysis for Hetals
Ash Concentration (mg/kg):
Total in Ash (nig):

Scrubber Exit H5 Hetals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PW (ug):
Total in Train (rag/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):

Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L):
Total in Scrubber Liquor (rag):





Arsenic
HI

0.82
46
193


9.1
819


0.001
27
0.028
0.009
14

0.089
126

to

0.82
46
193


9.1
819


0.000
27
'0.027
0.008
13

0.089
126





! Barium
H!
i
1
38
2149
8954


fes
5852


0.028
20
0.030
0.009
14
i
0.05
71

LO

38
2149
8954


65
5852


0.028
0
0.010
0.003
5

0.05
71





Cadmium
HI

0.5
28
118


0.5
45


0.005
17
0.021
0.007
10

0.036
51

LO

0
0
0


0.0
0


0.000
17
0.017
0.005
8

0.036
51




Train
200
740
3.177
1560

1420


Chromium
HI

33
1866
7776


59
5312


0.01
72
0.079
0.025
39

0.180
256

LO

33
1866
7776


59
5312


0.00
72
0.072
0.023
35

0.180
256


Data



26.0

375







(dscm/min)

(gal)


Lead
HI

11
622
2592


10
900


0.1
855
0.929
0.292
456

10.0
14195

LO

11
622
2592


0
0


0.0
855
0.855
0.269
420

10.0
14195

Hatal Discharge Distribution (X of Hetal Fed)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Kiln/Scrubber Closure:

424.0
29.4
65.4
518.8

424.0
28.6
65.4
518.0

65.4
017
0.8
66:8
[
65.4
0.2
0.8
66.4

38.2
35.9
.43.4
117.5






68.3
2.1
3.3
73.7

68.3
1.9
3.3
73.5

34.7
73.3
547.6
655.7

0.0
67.5
547.6
615.1

Normalized Hetal Distribution (X of Heasured)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Exit Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Total :

Apparent Scrubber Efficiency:

82
6
13
100

69
82
6
13
100

98
il
1
100

70 54
98
0
1
100

78
33
31
37
100

55






93
3
4
100

61
93
3
4
100

63
5
11
84
100

88
0
11
89
100

89
f
i
Nondetects set to detection limits

Scrubber Exit H5 Hetals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PW (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):
Antimony

0.1
10
0.084
0.026
41
Beryllium Selenium







0.002
0.2
0.002
0.001
0.8


.




0.2
: 20
0.168
0,053
82






Silver

0.01
1
0.008
0.003
4.1





















360!
-------
1
2 '
3
4
'5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
B

Test Number:
Date of Test:

Total Material Fed (kg):
Feed Duration (hr):
Feedrate (kg/hr):
Kiln Ash Weight (kg):
Kiln Ash Fraction (X of material fed):





C
************
5
11/06/91

225
4.00
56.1
91
40. 5




;***********!
D E F 6 H I

BOFORS-NOBEL SUPERFUND SITE TESTS
TRACE METALS DATA ANALYSIS

495 (Ib) Multiple Metals Flue Sas Sampling
240 (min) Scrubber Impinger Charge (mL):
124 (lo/hr) Scrubber Impinger Volume (mL):
201 (Ib) Scrubber MS Ga's Sampled (dscm):
Flue Gas Flowrate (dscm/hr):

Total Liquor Collected (L):



J
t******




Train
200
810
3.261
1608

1230

*******

Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium

Total Feed Analysis for Metals
Feed Concentration (mg/kg):
Metals Feedrate (mg/hr):
Total Metal Fed (mg):

Kiln Ash Analysis for Metals
Ash Concentration (mg/kg):
Total in Ash (mg):

Scrubber Exit MS Metals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PU (ug):
Total in Train (rag/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):

Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L):
Total in Scrubber Liquor (mg):

HI

0.82
46
184


4.2
382


0.0029 0
18
0.020
0.006
10

0.010
12

LO HI LO HI LO HI

0.82 38 38 0.5 0.0 33
46 2133 2133 28 0 1852
184 8532 8532 112 0 7409


4.2 74 74 0.5 0.0 59
382 6730 6730 45 0 5366


.0019 0.048 0.048 0.005 0.000 0.01
18 20 0 6.4 6.4 47
0.020 0.048 0.028 0.010 0.006 0.05S
0.006 0.015 0.008 0.003 0.002 0.017
10 24 14 5 3 27

0.010 0.02 0.02 0.005 0.000 0.110
12 25 25 6 0 135

LO
•
33
1852
7409


59
5366
i

0.00
47
0.047
0.014
23

0.110
135

K
*********




Data



26.8

325

Nt********

L
**********

05-Oct-92






(dscm/min)

(gal)

c******** **

Lead
HI

11
61-7
2470


12
1091


0.1
22
0.103
0.032
51

1.1
1353

LO

11
617
2470


12
1091


0.0
12
0.012
0.004
6

0.51
627

Metal Discharge Distribution (X of Metal Fed)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Kiln/Scrubber Closure:

207.5
21.8
6.7
235.9

207.5 78.9 78.9 40.5 72.4
20.9 1.1 0.6 18.4 1.5
6.7 0.3 0.3 5.5 1.8
235.1 80.3 79.8 64.3 75.7

72.4
1.3
1.8
75.5

44.2
' 8.2
54.8
107.2

44.2
1.0
25.4
70.5

Normalized Metal Distribution (X of Measured)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Exit Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Total :

Apparent Scrubber Efficiency:




Scrubber Exit MS Metals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PU (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):
88
9
• 3
100

23


Nondetects
Antimony

0.1
10
0.091
0.028
45
88 98 99 63 * 96
9 1 1 29 2
3 0 .0 9 2
100 100 * 100' 100 100

24 21 31 23 55


set to detection limits
Beryllium Selenium • Silver

0.002 0.2 0.01
0.2 20 1
0.002 0.182 0.009
0.001 0.056 0.003
0.9 90 4.5
96
2
'. 2
100

59
*******










41
8
51
100

87
*********










63
1
36
100

96
***********










361
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
10
AO
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
B
Test Number:
Date of Test:

Total Material Fed (kg):
Feed Duration (hr):
Feedrate (kg/hr):
Kiln Ash Weight (kg):
Kiln Ash Fraction (X of material fed):






Total Feed -Analysis for Hetals
Feed Concentration (mg/kg):
Hetals Feedrate (mg/hr):
Total Hetal Fed (rag):

Kiln Ash Analysis for Hetals
Ash Concentration (mg/kg):
Total in Ash (rag):

Scrubber Exit H5 Hetals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Fflter/PU (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate {mg/hr):

Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L):
Total in Scrubber Liquor (mg):

C D E F G H I
5
11/06/91

225 495 (Ib)
BOFORS-NOBEL SUPERFUND SITE TESTS
. TRACE HETALS DATA ANALYSIS

Multiple Hetals Flue Gas Sampling
4.00 240 (rain) Scrubber Impinger Charge (ml):
56.1 124 (Ib/hr) Scrubber Impinger Volume (ml):
91 201 (Ib)
40;5




Arsenic
HI LO

0.82 0.82
Scrubber H5 Gas Sampled (dscm):
Flue Gas Flowrate (dscm/hr):

total Liquor Collected (L):


J



Train
200
810
3.261
1608

1230


K



Data



26.8

325


Barium Cadmium Chromium
HI LO HID1 HID2 HI

38 38 0.5 0.0 33
46 46 2133 2133 28 0 1852
184 184 8532 8532 -112 0 7409


4.2 4.2


74 74 0.5 0.0 59
382 382 6730 6730 45 0 5366


0.0029 0.0019 0.
18 18
0.020 0.020 0.


048 0.048 0.005 0.000 0.01
20 0 6.4 6.4 47
048 0.028 0.010 0.006 0.055
0.006 0.006 0.015 0.008 0.003 0.002 0.017
10 10

0.010 0.010 0
12 12

24 14 5 3 27

.02 0.02 0.000 0.005 0.110
25 25 0 6 135

LO

33
1852
7409


59
5366


0.00
47
0.047
0.014
23

0.110
135

HID1

11
617
2470


12
1091


0.1
22
0.103
0.032
51

0.51
627

L
***lb******






(d!>cm/ini n

(gal )


Lead
HID2

11
617
. 2470


12
1091


0.0
12
0.012
0.004
6

1.10
1353

Ketal Discharge Distribution (X of Hetal Fed) j
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Kiln/Scrubber Closure:

207.5 207.5 78.9 78.9 40.5 72.4
21.8 20. 9
1.1 0.6 18.4 1.5
6.7 6.7 p. 3 0.3 0.0 1.8
235.9 235.1 80.3 79.8 58.9 75.7


72.4
1.3
1.8
75.5

44.2
8.2
25.4
77.8

44.2
1.0
54.8
99.9

Normalized Hetal Distribution (X of Measured)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Exit Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Total :

Apparent Scrubber Efficiency:

88 88
9 9
3 3 .
98 99- 69 96
1 1 31 2
000 2
100 ' • 100 100 100 100 100

23 24


21 31 ff 55

Nondetects set to detection limits
Antimony Beryllium Selenium Silver
Scrubber Exit H5 Hetals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PU (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):


96
2
2
100

59

\


57
11
33
100

76




44
1
55
100

98




0.1 0.002 0.2 0.01
10
B.2 20 1



0.091 0.002 0.182 0.009
0.028 0.001 0.056 0.003
45 0.9 90 4.5
362
-------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
-11
12
13
14
1 C
19
16
17°
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
£«
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
B
Test Number:
Date of Test:
V
Total Material Fed (kg):
Feed Duration (hr):
Feedrate (kg/hr):
Kiln Ash Weight (kg):
Kiln Ash Fraction (X of material fed):

C
6
11/07/91

232
4.17
55.6
87
37.7

0
Lagoon
. E
Sludge 8
F
6
H
I
J
K
80FORS-NOBEL SUPERFUND SITE TESTS
TRACE HETALS DATA

511

Ob)
250 (min)
123
193


(Ib/hr)
Ob)



Multiple
Scrubber
Scrubber
Scrubber
Flue Gas


L
05-Oct-92
ANALYSIS

Hetals Flue Gas
Impinger
Impinger
Charge
Volume
H5 Gas Sampled
Flowrate


Sampling
(mL):
(mL):
(dsctn) :
(dscm/hr) :


Total Liquor Collected (L):




Total Feed Analysis for Hetals
Feed Concentration (mg/kg):
Hetals Feedrate (mg/hr):
Total Metal Fed (mg):

Kiln Ash Analysis for Metals
Ash Concentration (mg/kg):
Total in Ash (mg):

Scrubber Exit MS Metals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/PW (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration {mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):

Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L) :
Total in Scrubber Liquor (mg):





Arsenic
HI

0.82
46
190


3.8
332


0.001
11
0.012
0.004
6

0.022
33

LO

0.82
46
190


3.8
332


0.000
11
0.011
0.003
5

0.000
0





Barium
HI

38
2112
8799


69
6025


0.044
20
0.044
0.014
22

0.14
212

LO

38
2112
8799


69
6025


0.044
0
0.024
0.007
12-

0.14
212





Cadmium
HI

0.5
28
116


0.5
44


0.005
7.0
0.011
0.003
6

0.011
17

LO

0.0
0
0


0.0
0


0.000
7.0
0.007.
0.002
3

0.000
0




Train
200
810
3.262
1626

1514



Data



27.1






(dscm/imn)

400 (gal)


**«»«»*•**«» K«»KK «»*«*««
Chromium
HI

33
1834
7641


79
6898


0.01
41 •
0.049
0.015
24

0.12
182

LO

33
1834
7641


79
6898


0.00
41
0.041
0.013
20

0.12
182

HI

11
611
2547


11
960


0.1
210
0.291
0.089
145

0.57
' 863



Lead
LO

11
611
2547


11
960


0.0
210
0.210
0.064
105

0.00
0

Metal Discharge Distribution (X of Metal Fed)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Kiln/Scrubber Closure:

174.7
12.9
17.5
205.2

174.7
12.0
0.0
186.8

68.5
1.0
2.4
71.9

68.5
0.6
2.4
71.5

37.7
19.8
,14.4
71.9






90.3
1.3
2.4
94.0

90.3
1.1
2.4
93.8

37.7
23.7
33.9
; 95.3

37.7
17.1
0.0
54.8

Normalized Metal Distribution (X of Measured)
Kiln Ash:
Scrubber Exit Flue Gas:
Scrubber Liquor:
Total :

Apparent Scrubber Efficiency:

85
6
9
100

58

94
6
0
100

0

95
1
3
100

70

96
1
3
100

81

52
28
20
100

42







*******
96
1
3
100

64
r *********
96
1
3
100

68
******
40
25
36
100

59
****»*»»
69
31
0
- 100" .

0

Nondetects set to detection limits

Scrubber Exit MS Metals Train
Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L):
Combined Filter/ PW (ug):
Total in Train (mg/train):
Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm):
Emission Rate (mg/hr):
Antimony

0.1
10
0.091
0.028
45
Beryllium Selenium







0.002
0.2
0.002
0.001
0.9







0.2
20
0.182
0.056
91






Silver

0.01
1
0.009
0.003
4.5





















363
-------
1 . B ' C D E
3 Test Number: 6 Lagoon Sludge
4 Date of Test: 11/07/91
5
6 Total Material Fed (kg): 232 511 (Ib)
7 Feed Duration (hr): 4.17 250 (min)
F 6 H I
8 BOFORS-NOBEL SUPERFUND SITE TESTS
TRACE HETALS DATA ANALYSIS ,

Multiple Hetals Flue Gas Sampling
Scrubber Impinger Charge (mL):
8 Feedrate (kg/hr): 55.6 123 (Ib/hr) Scrubber Impinger Volume (mL):
9 Kiln Ash Weight (kg): 87 193 (Ib)
10 Kiln Ash Fraction (X of material fed): 37.7
11
12
13
14

IS Arsenic
Scrubber MS Gas Sampled (dscm):
Flue Gas Flowrate (dscm/hr):

Total Liquor Collected (L):

"

J K L
************** A***********
05-Oct-92


Train Data
200
810
3.262
1626 27.1 (dscm/min)

1514 400 (gal)

ft **** ********* It *»«.-** Aft***














Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead
17 HID1 HID2 HI LO HI01 HID2 HI
19 Total Feed Analysis for Hetals

20 Feed Concentration (mg/kg): 0.82 0.82 |38 38 0.5 0.0 33
21 Hetals Feedrate (rog/hr): 46 46 2112 2112 28 0 1834
22 Total Metal Fed (mg): 190 190 8799 8799 116 0 7641
23
24 Kiln Ash Analysis for Metals
25 Ash Concentration (mg/kg): 3.8 3.8


69 69 . 0.5 0.0 79
26 Total in Ash (mg): 332 332 6025 6025 44 0 6898
27
28 Scrubber Exit MS Hetals Train


29 Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L): 0.001 0.000 0.044 0.044 0.005 0.000 0.01
30 Combined FUter/PU (ug): 11 11
20 0 7.0 7.0 41
31 . Total In Train (mg/train): 0.012 0.011 0.044 ' 0.024 0.011 0.007 0.049
32 Flue 6as Concentration (mg/dscm): 0.004. 0.003 0.014 0.007 0.003 0.002 0.015
33 Emission Rate (rog/hr): 6 5 |22 12 6 3 24
34

35 Scrubber Liquor Concentration (mg/L): 0.000 0.022 0.14 0.14 0.000 0.011 0.12
36 Total in Scrubber Liquor (mg): 0 33 212 212 0 17 182
37
38 Hetal Discharge Distribution (X of Metal Fed)
39 ' Kiln Ash: 174.7 174.7 66
40 Scrubber Flue Gas: 12.9 12.0 :
41 Scrubber Liquor: 0.0 17.5 !


.5 66.5 37.7 90.3
.0 0.6 19.8 1.3
.4 2.4 0.0 2.4
42 . Kiln/Scrubber Closure: 187.7 204.3 71.9 71.5 57.5 94.0
43
44 Horsallzed Hetal Distribution (X of Measured)
45 Kiln Ash: 93 86
46 Scrubber Exit Flue Gas: 7 6
47 Scrubber Liquor: 0 9
48 Total: 100 100
49
50 Apparent Scrubber Efficiency: 0 59

52


95 96 66 96
1 1 34 1
33,0 3
00 100 100 100

70 81 0 64
i« *

LO HID1 MID2

33 11 11
1834 611 611
7641 2547 2547-


79 11 11
6898 960 960


0.00 0.1 0.0
41 210 210
0.041 0.291 0.210
0.013 0.089 0.064
20 145 105

0.12 0.00 0.57
182 0 863


90.3 37.7 37.7
1.1 23.7 17.1
2.4 0.0 33.9
93.8 61.4 88.7


96 61 -43
1 39 19
3 0 38
' 100 100 100

68 0 66




































53 Nondetects set to detection limits
54 Antimony Beryllium Selenium Silver
55 Scrubber Exit H5 Ketals Train
<"


56 Combined Impinger Concentration (mg/L): , 0.1 0.002 0.2 0.01 •
57 Combined Filter/PU (ug): 10 0.2 20 1
58 Total In Train (mg/train): 0.091 0.002 0.182 0.009
59 Flue Gas Concentration (mg/dscm): 0.028 0.001 0.056 0.003
60 Emission Rate (mg/hr): 45 0.9 91 , 4.5
364



.. -



-------