xvEPA
            United States
            Enironmental Protection
            Agency
             Office of Research and
             Development
             Washington, DC 20460
EPA/600/R-93/140
May 1993
Behavior and
Determination of
Volatile Organic
Compounds in
           A Literature Review

-------
                                               EPA  600/R-93/140
                                                       May 1993
         BEHAVIOR  AND DETERMINATION OF
       VOLATILE  ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN SOIL:
                A LITERATURE  REVIEW
                           by

                      Marti Minnich
   Lockheed Environmental Systems & Technologies Company
                  980 Kelly Johnson Drive
                  Las Vegas, Nevada 89119
                  Contract No 68-CO-0049
                Work  Assignment Manager

                    Brian  Schumacher
           Exposure Assessment Research Division
        Environmental  Monitoring  Systems  Laboratory
               Las Vegas, Nevada 89193-3478
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING  SYSTEMS  LABORATORY
      OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND  DEVELOPMENT
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89193-3478
                                               Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
                                   NOTICE
      The development of this document has been funded by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-CO-0049 to Lockheed Environmental Systems
and Technologies Co. as part of an ongoing research effort in support of the Agency's
Superfund and Hazardous  Waste  programs.  It has been subject to the Agency's peer and
administrative review, and has been approved for publication as an EPA document.

      Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.

-------
                            EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
       Accurate  measurement of soil  volatile  organic  compound (VOC)
concentrations is crucial  to  site investigation, evaluation, and remediation  efforts  at
Superfund  sites  contaminated by VOCs  Soils that are contaminated with  VOCs
are potential  reservoirs  of long-term ground water contamination.  This report
summarizes literature pertaining to (1) the  fate and transport  of soil  VOCs and, (2)
the sampling and analysis of soil VOCs by  SW-846 Methods 8240/8260 using purge-
and-trap/gas  chromatography/mass  spectrometry  (PT/GC/MS).

FATE AND  TRANSPORT

       Nonpolar VOCs  are  sorbed  predominately  by soil organic matter in  moist or
wet soil. Soil sorption exhibits  an  initial phase of fast uptake, followed by slow
continued sorption  or diffusion of VOCs into  soil microsites. Resorption studies
show a similar  rapid resorption phase preceding  an  extended slow release  phase.
Soil water retains VOCs in proportion to compound-specific  Henry's Law  constants.
VOC vapors are adsorbed by soil  minerals in dry soil and the quantities adsorbed
are 2  to 4  orders of magnitude greater than sorption by wet soil. Contamination by
nonaqueous-phase liquids (NAPLs) results  in a residual saturation fraction,
described as tiny portions of NAPL held by capillary forces  in soil pores, which
changes  in  composition  over time by physiochemical  weathering. The size of the
residual NAPL  fraction is related to  the soil porosity.

       Biodegradation of naturally  occurring  VOCs (such as  petroleum  products)
readily occurs under aerobic conditions. Microorganisms also degrade halogenated
aromatics (such as chlorobenzene)  aerobically, but more slowly than the naturally
occurring VOCs Halogenated aliphanes (such as  chloroform and TCE)  are
degraded far more  slowly than  the other compounds, by microorganisms or abiotic
processes,  and mainly under anaerobic conditions. Degradation of  halogenated
aliphanes, however,  has  been observed in  soils containing  substantial amounts  of
biodegradable carbon compounds,  presumably by  co-metabolism.

       VOCs move in soils by  diffusion  and advection. Vapor diffusion,  density-
driven NAPL vapor  advection,  and gravity-driven NAPL advection are the most
important mechanisms for movement.  The movement  of two fluorocarbons by
diffusion in deep sediments in Texas  progressed approximately 44 m vertical in 40
years  (time since manufactured). Movement  of  carbon tetrachloride  (a  dense
solvent) 177 m  to ground water at a site in Idaho (time  of travel  unknown)
                                        in

-------
 is believed to be caused by density-driven vapor advection. Movement of benzene,
 toluene, and xylene (solvents less dense than water) 24.4 m vertically in less than 7 years
 at a California site has been attributed to gravity-driven NAPL advection.

 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

       Substantial volatile and degradative losses of soil  VOCs have been documented to
 occur from sample preservation and subsampling steps of SW-846 Methods  8240/8260.
 Soil samples stored cold (4°C) have maximum holding times of less than 3 days before
 the concentration falls below the 90% confidence limit of the initial value. Laboratory
 soil transfers create VOC losses that widely vary by compound and soil, but losses
 average approximately 60%.

       Immersion of soil samples in methanol has been shown to reduce VOC losses
 during sample storage and preparation for analysis. Although the analytical sensitivity of
 methanol-preserved samples is less than that of soil/water samples analyzed by purge-
 and-trap (PT) preparation, soil-VOC concentrations in methanol-preserved samples were
 1 to 3  orders of magnitude greater than soil-VOC concentrations in collocated samples
 analyzed by low level PT/GC/MS. This implies  that much of the existing data of soil
 VOCs  analyzed by SW-846 Method 8240 could be 1 to 3 orders of magnitude below
 values  obtained in properly preserved samples or obtained by field analysis.

       To a large extent erratic recovery of same-day  spikes and loss of analyte during
 storage has impeded the  accurate assessment of soil-VOC measurement errors. Quality
 control samples  or performance evaluation materials (PEMs) are not available for soil
 VOCs  Recently, vapor fortification of small (2 to 3 g), dry soil samples (four
 compounds spiked onto two soils) has established low relative  standard deviations among
 samples and storage of at least 3 weeks without measurable sample loss. The technique
 does not calculate spike recoveries but creates stable  and reproducible  concentrations of
 VOC-contaminated soils. It is limited to small aliquots of dry soil.  Another option for
 PEMs might be samples immersed in methanol.

       Current analytical methods that utilize PT techniques to remove soil  VOCs are
not sufficient to  extract entrapped VOCs (also referred to as residual, nonequilibrium, or
 slowly  desorbing VOCs).

      Field (static) headspace techniques offer a rapid means of quantifying soil VOCs
with some restrictions. First, the detection limit is not as  low as can be achieved with a
PT preconcentration step. After the  compounds  of interest are identified, however,

                                        iv

-------
options for detectors other than the mass spectrometer allow for extremely low detection
limits. Second, in soils that  are high in organic matter or soils that have a large fraction
of slowly desorbing VOCs, PT extraction may be more thorough than soil headspace,
thus necessitating laboratory corroboration of field data.

-------
                                  CONTENTS

Executive Summary	  iii
Figures	   viii
Tables	  ix
Abbreviations and Acronyms	x
Acknowledgment	xi

Introduction	   1
      Objective and Scope	   1
      Background	   2
            Definition of a Soil VOC	   2
            Occurrence  and Ranking of VOCs	   3
            Statement of the Problem	   7
Interphase Transfers	   9
      Aqueous-Sorbed Distribution	   9
      Nonequilibrium  Sorption	   13
      Vapor-Sorbed  Distribution	   16
      Vapor-Aqueous  Distribution	   20
      NAPL-Aqueous/Vapor Distributions	   21
Summary of Interphase Transfers	   22
Degradation	   23
      Microbiological Degradation	   23
      Abiotic Degradation	   26
      Factors Affecting Degradation Rates	   27
      Summary of Degradation	   29
Movement of VOCs in theVadose Zone	  	   31
      Vapor Diffusion	   31
      Vapor Advection	   32
      Aqueous Convection	   33
      Volatilization-Gaseous Diffusion and Aqueous Convection Combined 	   33
      Field Studies of VOC Fate and Movement	  	   34
            Field Experiments	   34
            Field Investigations	   36
      Summary of VOC  Movement	   38
Modeling the Movement of Soil VOCs	   40
      Screening/Management Models	   43
      Laboratory Soil Column Simulations	   44
      Field-Scale Simulations	   46
      Summary of Models	   48

                                      vi

-------
Obtaining  and Maintaining  VOC Samples	50
      Current Sampling  Methods  	50
      Laboratory Sampling  Studies	52
      Field Samplings Studies	54
             Spatial Variability	57
      Sample Storage and Preservation	58
             Constraints on the Container Material	58
             Studies of VOC-Spiked Soil Storage Times	59
      Summary of Sampling and Preservation methods	61
Analytical  Methodology   	64
      SW-846 Method 8240 and Related Methods	64
      Modifications Offered to Improve Soil Purge-and-Trap Analysis	65
      Analytical Sensitivity of Solvent Extracts  	67
      Exhaustive Extractions to Recover Sorbed VOCs	68
      Summary  of Analytical  Methodology	71
Field Methods for Determining  Soil Gas and Soil VOCs	73
      Justification for Field Methods	73
      Soil-Gas Measurements  	74
      Soil Headspace  Methods	77
      Advanced Field Extraction and Analysis Methods	79
      Summary  of Field Methods	80
Conclusions  	82
      Fate and Transport  of  Soil  VOCs	82
      Sample Size  	85
      Sample Preservation  and Analysis	85
      Field  Methods   	87
References	89
                                      vn

-------
                                  FIGURES


Number                                                                 Page

   1 Log  Koc-Log  Kowrelationship	11

   2 Vapor-phase sorption as a function of moisture content	19

   3 Collocated soils samples analyzed by conventional PT/GC/MS, limited disruption
      (LD)PT/GC/MS, and headspace (HS)GC	55

   4 Fate of soil VOCs	83
                                     Vlll

-------
                                   TABLES


Number

   1 VOCs on the Revised Priority Hazardous Substances List (HSL)	4

   2 Laboratory Dissipation Half-Lives of Some Organic Compounds	29

   3 Comparative Features of Some Vapor-Transport Models	41

   4 Comparison of Purge-and-Trap Versus Solvent Extraction for Analysis of Aged,
      EDB-Contaminated Soil	70
                                      IX

-------
                      ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ASTM      American Society of Testing and Materials
BET        Brunauer-Emmett-Teller
BTEX      benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene(s)
BTX        benzene, toluene, and xylene(s)
CLP        Contract Laboratory Program, administered under the EPA
                   Superfund Program
EDB        ethylene dibrornide, 1,2-dibromoethane
EPA        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FID        flame ionization detector
GC         gas chromatography
HS         headspace
INEL Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
LD         limited disruption
MHT        maximum holding time
MS         mass spectrometry
NAPL      nonaqueous-phase liquid
NOC       nonpolar, nonionic organic compound
PCB        polychlorinated biphenyl
PCE        perchloroethylene,  tetrachloroethene
PEM       performance evaluation material
PID        photoionization detector
PT         purge and trap
PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene, Teflon®
PVC        polyvinylchloride
QA/QC     quality assurance/quality control
RCRA      Resource Conservation  and Recovery Act
RH         relative humidity
RSD        relative standard deviation
SFE        supercritical fluid extraction
SOW       Statement of Work, laboratory procedures for the CLP
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
TCE        trichloroethylene,  trichloroethene
TPH        total petroleum hydrocarbons
VOA       volatile organics analysis
VOCs volatile organic compounds

-------
                             ACKNOWLEDGMENT
      The author is grateful for the helpful conversations and reviews furnished by
colleagues at Lockheed, especially Neal Amick, Roy Cameron, Patty Fitzpatrick, Tim
Lewis, Cindy Mayer, Beth Moore, and Jim Pollard. Formal reviews were provided by
Brian Schumacher, Robert Siegrist,  Steve Ward, Jeff van Ee, Katrina Varner, and
William Spencer,  all of whom helped revise and clarify this document. Many thanks to
the editors Domenic Fuccillo,  Marianne Faber, and Bobbie Stephens who endured and
managed to concentrate while  reading this manuscript.
                                       XI

-------
                                   SECTION 1

                                INTRODUCTION
       Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are the most common and the most mobile
subsurface contaminants encountered at Superfund and other hazardous waste sites.
VOCs can be toxic, mutagenic, or carcinogenic. Soil VOCs are of concern primarily as a
potential source of ground-water contamination. They may contribute to inhalation
exposure, which can result when volatile emissions emanate from the soil surface. Soil
VOCs also may be associated with ingestion exposure, which can occur when children
play in contaminated soil or when the compounds are absorbed into the edible portion of
agricultural plants. Accurate soil and sediment VOC determinations are needed to
assess the extent of contamination to make decisions on appropriate cleanup activities,
and to verify remediation efforts.

OBJECTIVE AND  SCOPE

       At the request of the U.S. EPA a literature review was conducted to present and
assess literature research results pertaining to the problems and inconsistencies observed
in the sampling and analysis of soil VOCs by SW-846 Methods 8240/8260. SW-846
Methods 8240/8260 are the primary soil-VOC laboratory methods, intended to provide
the most definitive compound identification  and the lowest detection limits. These
methods  entail a purge-and-trap (PT) preparation/extraction step SW-846 Method 5030
and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis procedures (USEPA,
1986,  1990). SW-846 Method 8240 uses a packed GC column and Method 8260 uses a
capillary GC column. Field sampling procedures are largely unspecified. The results
and discussion presented here are intended to be used by the U.S. EPA to evaluate
problems with the current SW-846 methods and to be the basis for future potential
research needed that will increase the precision and accuracy of soil vadose zone VOC
measurements.

       The scope of this project included vadose zone soil and sediments only, even
though the SW-846 methods are designed to  be applied to any solid matrix samples.
Literature on vapor-phase and other field measurement techniques was included insofar
as data comparisons with laboratory purge-and-trap (PT) techniques were given or when
data were supplied that help define the representativeness, precision, and accuracy of the
total soil-VOC measurements.

-------
       The term "soil"  in  this report refers  generally to any unconsolidated surficial
geologic sediments and associated  organic matter,  2 mm or less  in size, irrespective
of pedogenic processes.  This definition derives from common  usage in the fields of
engineering (Holtz and Kovacs,  1981)  Geologists and  soil  scientists would consider
this  definition to represent "soils and sediments."

       The literature search for this project  was conducted  in  three modes: (1) tree-
searching,  starting  with an initial  body  of  literature obtained  from  Lockheed
researchers, (2) scanning  Current  Contents: Agriculture, Biology,  and
Environmental  Sciences (Institute  for  Scientific Information,  Inc., Philadelphia,  PA)
from 1990 through mid-1992 for relevant titles, and (3) personal communications
with  researchers currently  studying  soil-VOC measurement procedures.  On-line
data bases were searched  by using different strategies  and key words.  On-line
searches provided some, but  not sufficient,  references to support this project.
Literature was  collected for  this review through mid-1992,  with  the  exception of the
inclusion  of abstracts from the January 1993  National  Symposium on "Measuring
and  Interpreting VOCs in Soils  State  of the  Art  and Research Needs."

BACKGROUND

Definition  of a Soil VOC

       For soil and water  samples, the prevailing definition of VOCs is associated
with the PT/GC/MS analytical methods (USEPA, 1986, 1990, Lesage  and Jackson,
1992). These are broad-based methods, i.e.  designed to measure as many compounds
as possible with a single procedure,  comprised of compounds  that are relatively
insoluble in water and that have  boiling points below 200°C (USEPA, 1986, 1990) or
below 150°C (Lesage  and Jackson, 1992).  The PT preparation technique promotes
low  detection limits (parts-per-billion range) and the MS detector  provides positive
compound identification.  Volatile  compounds that  contain polar  functional groups
(such as low molecular weight ketones, alcohols, aldehydes, nitriles,  and ethers) are
generally  soluble in water, do not  purge well, and produce broad,  tailing  GC peaks
that  give  poor quantitative estimates and are  often  difficult to identify by MS
(Swallow, 1992). Some polar compounds are  included in SW-846 Methods 8240/8260
(USEPA,  1986, 1990),  but  the recovery of polar compounds is often less than 20%
(Swallow,  1992). New preparation  methods  for some of the nonconventional
analytes (water soluble  analytes  such as alcohols, ketones,  ethers, and esters) are
included in the Third Update  to  SW-846 (Lesnik, 1993). These methods are
Azeotropic Distillation (SW-846  Method 5031) and  Closed  System Vacuum
Distillation with Cryogenic Condensation (SW-846 Method 5032).

-------
      While the  efficiency  of broad-based methods is positive, the use of broad-
based methods as definitions  has tended  to induce an obtuse  view promoting the
likeness  of  VOCs and the aggregate similarities of compound behavior in soil
(Siegrist, 1993). In fact,  the physicochemical properties of various VOCs  vary over
orders  of magnitude. Differences in vapor pressure, water volubility,  and octanol
water partition coefficient  impart  even  larger differences in air-water partitioning
and  soil sorption  coefficients. Additionally,  divergent appraisals  of a  compound's
physiochemical parameters  are  the  rule,  as several  plausible measurement  and
estimation techniques exist.  The reader is referred to Lewis et al.  (1991), Devitt et
al. (1987), or recent handbooks (Howard, 1990;  Lyman et al., 1990) for listings that
describe  the physiochemical  properties  of VOCs

Occurrence  and Ranking  of VOCs

      The  presence  of VOCs in ground  water is well documented A  study  of  479
waste disposal sites  throughout  the United States (Plumb, 1991) reported  that VOCs
accounted for 84% of all the  detectable events in the composite data set  of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act  (RCRA)  Appendix IX organic
constituents  (52 FR 25942, July 9,  1987). VOCs were also the most prevalent  subsets
when organic compounds found in  ground water were ranked by number of sites
and regions (Plumb, 1991).

      The  Priority List of  Hazardous Substances is  revised annually as mandated
by  the  Comprehensive  Environmental  Response, Compensation,  and Liability Act
as amended by the Superfund  Amendments  and  Reauthorization Act. Two
agencies, the U.S. Department of Health Services  and the U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), are required to produce  a list of substances  most
commonly found at  facilities  on the National  Priorities  List and which, at the
discretion of these agencies, pose the most significant potential threat  to  human
health (see 52 FR 12866, April 17, 1987). The 1991 list (56 FR 52169, October 17, 1991)
ranked substances with a formula  that included three  factors (1) frequency of
detection in all media at sites on the National  Priority List, (2) toxicity, and  (3)
potential for human exposure.

      Table  1 lists the volatile  chemicals of concern, as  ranked  on the  Revised
Priority  List of Hazardous Substances (56 FR 52169, October 17,  1991).  The list
includes  all  compounds that appear in EPA methods for analysis of volatile
organics in soil (SW-846 Methods 8240/8260; USEPA, 1990) and compounds that  could
be termed "nonconventional" VOCs (Lesnik, 1993). For  comparison, the compounds
are  also  ranked by frequency of detection in ground water as the  only criteria

-------
TABLE 1. VOCs ON THE REVISED PRIORITY HAZARDOUS
             SUBSTANCES LIST (HSL)*.
HSL
Rank
4
5
8
10
22
33
35
36
44
49
52
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
68
80
96
Ground-water
Frequency
Rank+
15
11
5
2
3
16
9
38
76
161
1
NL
18
10
98
7
8
14
12
NL
6
4
Contaminant
vinyl chloride (chloroethene)
benzene
chloroform (trichloromethane)
trichloroethylene (trichloroethene, TCE)
tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene, PCE)
carbon tctrachloride (tetrachloromethane)
toluene (methyl benzene)
hexachlorobutadiene
dibromochloropropane (DBCP)
1,2-dibromoethane (ethylene dibromide, EDB)
methylene chloride (dichloromethane)
methane
naphthalene
1.2dichloroethane
2-hexanone (methyl butyl ketone)
1,1-dicholroethane
1,1,1-trichloroethane
chlorobenzene
ethyl benzene
total xylene
1,1-dicholoroethane
1,2-dichloroethane, trans
SW-846
Analysis
Methods**
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A,C
A,C
A
D
B
A
A3
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
                                                 (continued)

-------
TABLE 1. VOCs ON THE REVISED PRIORITY HAZARDOUS
             SUBSTANCES LIST (HSL)*.
HSL
Rank
99
101
111
120
126
129
131
132
137
138
139
145
150
175
182
183
187
189
190
191
194
197
201
Ground-water
Frequency
Rank+
21
95
NL
36
22
102
NL
19
26
25
20
27
NL
NL
69
NL
43
NL
75
NL
82
42
NL
Contaminant
acetone (2-propanone)
acrolein (propenal)
l,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
1 , 1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-dichlorobenzene
carbon disulfide
trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2-trichloroethane
2-butanone (methyl ethyl ketone)
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene
chloroethane
1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene
hexane
dichlorobenzene
chlorodibromomethane
bromodichloroethane
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
chloromcthane (methyl chloride)
ethyl ether
bromoform (tribromomethane)
o-xylene
dichloroethane
SW-846
Analysis
Methods**
A,E
A,F
A,C
A
B
A
A
A
A,E
B
A
B
D
B
A
D
B
A
A
E
A
A
A
                                              (continued)

-------
             TABLE 1. VOCs ON THE REVISED PRIORITY HAZARDOUS
                              SUBSTANCES LIST (HSL)*.
HSL
Rank
209
211
212
228
229
234
235
237
247
249
250
253
254
259
262
264
Ground-water
Frequency
Rank+
67
NL
153
NL
96
68
24
29
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
Contaminant
methyl isobutyl ketone (4-methyl 2-pentanone)
trichlorofluoroethane
pentachloroethane
formaldehyde
1,3-dichloropropane, cis
styrene (vinyl benzene)
trichlorofluoromethane
1 ,2-dichloropropane
m-xylene
p-xylcne
isopropanol
1,2-dichloroethane, cis
dichloroethane
1,3 -butadiene
isopropyl ether
bromodichloromethane
SW-846
Analysis
Methods**
A,E
D
A,G
D
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
A
D
D
A
Abbreviation: HSL = Hazardous Substances List; NL = not listed
* 56 FR 52169, October 17, 1991
"Frequency of detection in disposal site ground water (Plumb, 1991).
** SW-846 methods of analysis:
      A - Methods 8240/8260
      B - Methods 8260 and 8250/8270
      C - Method 8011
      D - No SW-846 method
      E - Method 8015
      F - Method 8030
      G - Method 8240 notes poor chromatographic behavior for direct injection and it is inappropriate
      to use purge and trap for this analyte

-------
(Plumb,  1991). Within the  context of organic and inorganic hazardous  substances in
all  media,  four VOCs are included in  the  uppermost ten priority substances  (56 FR
52169, October 17, 1991). On the basis  of  potential ground- water contaminants,
VOCs comprise the entire  list of the top ten organic substances occurring in
ground water (Plumb, 1991).

Statement  of  the  Problem

      Soil VOCs are particularly difficult  to describe because  they occur in several
phases (gas,  aqueous solution, sorbed,  and nonaqueous-phase liquid [NAPL]) within
heterogeneous media that often  must be drilled to  obtain  samples. VOC collection
and quantification are confounded by  the  relative mobility  of  the  vapor phase.
The vapor fraction at the time of sampling  will  depend primarily  on the
physiochemical properties of the  compound; total  concentration of the compound
temperature;  soil organic matter content;  soil water  potentiat;  and  the
amount,  character,  and distribution  of soil pores. Estimates of the phase
distribution of VOCs  in  soil are generally based on equilibrium calculations.  The
distributions, however,  are  simplifications  of complex media and are difficult to
verify because of the practical  limitations  of studying  multiphasic, multicomponent
soil systems.

      Difficulties  in  measuring soil  VOCs occur  in  sampling,  storage,  subsampling,
and analysis steps. First, mixed and variable sources of contamination
superimposed  on  a  naturally  heterogeneous  medium aggravate sampling  difficulties
for all soil contaminants, including VOCs however,  for  VOCs rapid sample
collection without any  homogenization  steps or compositing  is  generally necessary
to  minimize volatilization  losses.  This requirement  imposes short-range variability
that greatly aggravates the  problem of representing  field VOC  concentrations.
Second, storage of samples prior to  analysis has been associated with large losses of
VOCs Rapid and  severe loss of soil VOCs occurs during storage in sealed vials at  4
°C  (Jenkins et al., 1993  King, 1993). Third,  the current laboratory subsampling step
causes losses averaging 60% (Maskarinec et  al., 1988). Finally,  laboratory analytical
procedures contribute  to  large data variances.  No  adequate performance
evaluation  materials  exist to assist  in  quality assurance/quality control  (QA/QC)  of
soil volatiles analyses (Zarrabi et al., 1991).  Analytical accuracy as  measured by
matrix spike recovery is generally 40%  to  120%;  however,  the  recoveries reported
are  achieved only when the matrix  spike is  purged seconds to  minutes after
addition of the spike.  The use of PT sparging  to  extract volatiles from soils may be
inadequate  when  the  compounds have  been  in contact with a  particular soil for
months or years (Sawhney et al., 1988; Pignatello, 1990a; Pavlostathis and Jaglal,  1991).

-------
Considered together,  the  difficulties mean that data obtained by following SW-846
Methods 8240/8260 are prone to poor field representativeness and  a large negative
bias.

      A symposium was  held in January 1993 in Las Vegas, NV, on "Measuring and
Interpreting  VOCs  in Soils  State of the Art  and Research  Needs." The  symposium
served as a national  forum for soil-VOC  data users and  generators of that  data to
(1) explore  the  foundation  of the  conventional VOC measurement  and
interpretation process, (2) examine  results  from research  and practice  that have
advanced the understanding of this  process,  and (3) attempt  to  develop  consensus  on
current  practices, recommendations for alternative  procedures,  and  critical  research
needs. Many abstracts from that symposium have been included in this review.
When available, the  symposium proceedings will offer additional  perspective and
insight beyond the  scope of this literature  review.

-------
                                    SECTION  2

                           INTERPHASE  TRANSFERS
       Soil VOCs can exist in  four distinct phases aqueous, gaseous, sorbed, and
NAPL. This section provides a review of  studies on the  equilibrium distribution of
soil  VOCs  among phases  aqueous-sorbed,  vapor-sorbed, aqueous-vapor, and NAPL-
aqueous/vapor  distributions.  Studies of kinetically  slow or  nonequilibrium
distributions  of sorbed VOCs are  presented in  a  separate  subsection.

AQUEOUS-SORBED  DISTRIBUTION

       Most VOCs analyzed by SW-846 Methods 8240/8260 are relatively nonpolar,
nonionic  organic  contaminants  (NOCs) that partition into  soil organic  matter
because  of the  hydrophobic  nature of the compounds. Here  the  term "partition" is
used to describe a model in which the sorbed material  permeates or dissolves
(absorbs)  into an organic phase (Chiou, 1989). "Adsorption" refers to the
condensation of vapor or solute on the surfaces of a solid  by physical forces or
chemical  bonding. The term  "sorption" is used  to denote uptake  of a vapor or
solute  without  reference to a specific mechanism  (Chiou,  1989).  These terms are not
consistent in the literature.  "Partition" or "distribution"  coefficients may be used
more generally  to denote the equilibrium ratios of  a compound  between any two
phases, viz., air-water,  soil-water,  or soil-air.  The  term "sorption  coefficient"  carries
the implicit assumption  of a reversible process  at equilibrium, that is, a state in
which  sorption  and resorption  are occurring  at the  same rate.

       The sorption  of NOCs in saturated porous  media, as measured in the
laboratory, can  be predicted  within an order  of magnitude based on properties  of
the pollutant, using either  the  water volubility or the  octanol-water partition
coefficient (Kow) and the weight fraction of  soil organic  carbon (Chiou et al., 1979;
Karickhoff,  1984; and Karickhoff et al., 1979). Sorption  is described by a linear
equation of the  form S  = KdC, where  S is the NOC concentration in soil, Kd(also
denoted as Kp)  is the sorption  coefficient, and C  is the  equilibrium NOC
concentration in solution. The  sorption coefficient,  Kd,  can be normalized  by
dividing  it by  the fractional  organic carbon content  of  soil,  focto give the  relatively
invariable organic  carbon  partitioning coefficient,  Koc(Kd/foc= Koc)  This  linear
partitioning  is bounded at the low end by some minimal value of  soil  organic
matter  (e.g.,  organic carbon fraction exceeding 0.1%; Schwarzenbach  and Westall,
1981) and bounded at the high  end by some fraction of  sorbate (NOC) volubility

-------
(Piwoni  and Banerjee,  1989). Brusseau and Rao (1989) place the upper boundary in
terms  of the sorbate activity coefficient; a  concentration threshold  of 0.056 M is
established, below which the  sorbate  activity coefficient is constant  and linear
isotherms  are likely.

       The  order-of-magnitude  error in estimates of sorption  based on  Koc occurs
because  there are  inherent  limitations  to the empirical  correlations.  Figure  1 shows
the 95% confidence limits for Kocas estimated by  an empirical  correlation with the
KoWfor a diverse set of 34 NOCs, including pesticides, polycyclic  aromatic
compounds, and 7 VOCs  (Hassett et al., 1983). Graphical depiction of the log-log
correlation  demonstrates  the approximate 6 orders of magnitude  over which the
relationship was generated  and the  order of magnitude error for  any particular  Koc
value  within the 95%  confidence limits of the  correlation. The  situation is  similar
for the  other empirical correlations with Kow or water volubility (Hassett  and
Banwart, 1989).

       Other  reasons for differences  between  estimated  and measured  Kdvalues
generally fall into two categories  the contribution of soil mineral matter, or
differences  in the  chemical nature  of organic matter.  Mingelgrin  and Gerstl  (1983)
reviewed the  literature on soil sorption of  nonionic compounds  and  discussed the
many  limitations of Kocestimates.  They cited  work by some  researchers which
showed  that removal of organic  matter from soils and  sediments  had relatively
little effect on,  or actually  increased,  sorption  of nonionic compounds.   In part,  this
phenomenon may be an artifact  caused by the  difficulty in measuring  small quan-
tities of organic matter and small values of  sorbate uptake (Rutherford  et  al., 1992)

       Garbarini  and Lion (1986) studied sorption of toluene and TCE by  several
organic sorbents (viz., whole soil; humic acid, fulvic acid, and humin  extracts of soil;
tannic  acid, lignin, zein, cellulose;  ethyl ether extracted soil,  and the resulting
extracts,  which  contained soil  fats-waxes-resins). They found  widely varying
affinities for the chemicals  that could  not be explained by the organic  carbon
content of the sorbent.  Lignin followed by zein had the highest sorption
coefficients of all  sorbents  studied.  On an  organic carbon basis  (Koc, however, the
fats-waxes-resins sorbed  the largest  amount.  Observations on  the  relative  degree of
decomposition, the direct  or indirect effects  of the inorganic matrix,  and the
contribution  of  relatively hydrophilic   oxygen-containing  functional groups in
organic matter were explored  by multivariate  regression analyses. Results showed
that using  the oxygen  and carbon content of a  sorbent  yielded more accurate
predictions  of the  sorption  coefficient  than did  carbon content alone.
                                         10

-------
 PREDICTION OF EQUILIBRIUM SORPTION COEFFICIENTS
  7


  6


  5
o
3  3
   2


   1
           95% CONFIDENCE
             INTERVAL

= 0.088 + 0.909(±0.002) log Kow
     f2 = 0.93
    01    2345678

                         LOG Kow
    Figure 1. Log Koc- Log Kowrelationship (after Hasset and Banwart,  1989.)
                              11

-------
       Similarly, Rutherford et al.  (1992)  found that peat sorbs relatively  more
NOCs  than  does cellulose. They propose  that differences correlate with  the  polar
to  nonpolar group  ratio  [(O+N)/C]of the organic  matter.  They  suggest,  however,
that variability  in soil organic C content of organic matter falls within 53% to 63%
for most soils.  On  the basis of this  assumption,  and confining the prediction  to soils
that contain at  least 0.2% organic matter (or approximately 0.1%  organic  carbon),
the  variation in partitioning  coefficients  attributable to  the  nature of the organic
matter  is within a factor of 3.

       In addition to  indigenous  soil  organic  carbon, anthropogenic sources of
organic  carbon  (such as residual petroleum)  act  as a highly effective partition
medium for organic contaminants.  Boyd and  Sun (1990)  showed  that residual
petroleum was  approximately 10 times  more  effective than  soil organic matter as a
partition  medium  for  pentachlorophenol  or  toluene.  Soil distribution coefficients
were predicted  as the sum of the partitioning into natural  organic matter and
partitioning into the residual  oil or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) phase. Oil-
water  distribution coefficients were evaluated in a  manner  similar to that of
octanol-water distribution  coefficients.  In  soils that contained  residual petroleum
or PCBS, the magnitude of the oil-water coefficient greatly  enhanced the NOC
uptake  and was believed to  limit  the effectiveness  of  some  remediation efforts
(Boyd and Sun, 1990). Bouchard et al. (1990)  studied the  same phenomena  on soils
that were treated with unleaded  gasoline  in  the  laboratory to  form a residual
hydrocarbon fraction. By  comparing  sorption of  benzene and naphthalene  on
treated  and control  soils,  they showed that the most profound effect occurred on
those sorbents low  in natural organic carbon.

       Estimation  of VOC  sorption based  on Koc values is recommended only for
soils that contain more than O.l% organic carbon (or more than O.2% organic
matter).  No procedure  exists for the estimation of VOC  sorption  in soil that  is
very low in organic matter.  Mineralogical effects related to the surface  charge of
individual mineral  species  will affect sorption when organic  matter is low. In soils
that  contain mixed wastes, such as the  soils  in landfills,  the  nature of the organic
matter will have the greatest effect where the organic input is extremely fresh
(virtually undegraded) or where organic carbon is exceptionally aged (coal is  an
extreme  example). The  presence of  anthropogenic,  nonpolar organic liquid wastes
will  further increase sorption  of NOCs.
                                         12

-------
       Soil sorption of polar VOCs (e.geketones, aldehydes, nitriles)  is generally
nonlinear and varies with the type and  quantity of clay minerals in the  soil.
Estimates of sorption for polar  compounds may be  based on  empirical relationships
generated by chemical  class (Karickhoff, 1984).

NONEQUILIBRIUM  SORPTION

       True sorption equilibrium  may require  weeks to months  to  achieve
(Karickhoff,  1984).  A  growing body of literature is  addressing the  impact of
nonequilibrium  or  rate-limited sorption-desorption  on  estimates  of organic chemical
distribution coefficients and on solute transport modeling  (Brusseau and Rao,  1989).
Equilibrium sorption occurs rapidly (2 to 48 h), and little  change is observed when
the experimental time  is  doubled,  as represented  by sorption  coefficients (Kdor Koc)
"Sorption nonequilibrium"  denotes  slow sorption-desorption processes and
nonreversible  sorption.  The term "chemical  nonequilibrium"  refers  to  rate-limited
interactions between the  sorbate and sorbent (e.g.  chemisorption).  Conventional
VOCs are largely  devoid of  functional  groups that  participate in chemisorption,
thus  irreversible sorption  is  unlikely.  Intraaggregate  or   intraorganic  matter
diffusion  in soil is  believed to be the rate-limiting process for NOC sorption
(Steinberg et al., 1987;  Hamaker and Thompson, 1972; Pignatello,  1990b; Brusseau et
al, 1991, Ball and Roberts, 1991b).

       The term "nonequilibrium" refers more generally to the concept that
numerous physical  and chemical factors preclude  equilibrium  in field
environments. The  existence of  secondary soil  structures, including aggregates,
fractures,  and bedding,  creates what are termed transport  or physical
nonequilibrium  effects  (Brusseau and Rao,  1989). Transport-related nonequilibrium,
resulting from the  existence of a heterogeneous flow domain, is discussed in the
section on modeling in this review. Nonequilibrium  sorption is a term that spans  a
scale  ranging  from  microscopic effects on soil surfaces to  macroscopic diffusion or
"mass transfer"  effects  within  pores  of varying sizes.

       Laboratory sorption  data have been found to  exhibit a  two-stage  approach to
equilibrium: a short initial phase of fast uptake, followed  by  an extended period of
much slower uptake (Brusseau and Rao,  1989; Harmon  et al., 1989).  Sorption is
viewed as a rapid  partitioning of NOCs into organic matter  (within hours or  days),
followed  by a  much  slower uptake phenomenon involving intraaggregate  or
intraorganic matter  diffusion.  Batch  resorption studies  similarly  show a  rapid
release  phase  followed by an extended  slow resorption phase  (Pavlostathis and
Mathavan, 1992). Brusseau and Rao (1989) estimated that, following the  initial rapid
                                         13

-------
phase  of sorption,  approximately 100% more sorption will occur by slow sorption
processes. Measurement techniques do not distinguish the  scale of the  continued
sorption,  and therefore slow diffusion into microsites  is  incorporated into the term
nonequilibrium sorption.

       Evidence for nonequilibrium sorption in a field soil was  first reported by
Steinberg et al. (1987). The soil fumigant  1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) was being
detected in ground water,  but  extensive searching had not identified  the source.
Hot methanol (75  °C  for 24 h) was used to extract the overlying agricultural soils.
Some  of the soil had  received no known applications of EDB for as long as 19 years
before the hot solvent extraction. EDB residues  in the 1OO ng/g range  were found
in the soils. The  residue  was  resistant to  volatilization  and microbial degradation,
and  the  release into aqueous solution  was extremely slow at 25  °C. Increasing the
temperature to 75  °C  released  greater  than 25% of the EDB from  a fine sandy loam
soil  in less than 3 h.  Release  of residual  EDB to aqueous  extracts from pulverized
soil  increased with degree  of pulverizing (time in ball mill), leading the authors  to
conclude  that the  EDB residues were  occluded in soil micropores.

       Pignatello (1990a) studied the  potential of several halogenated hydrocarbons
(all VOCs) to  form slowly reversible  or "residual" VOC  fractions in soils. Nine
halogenated  aliphanes  were added to  soil.  The residual  fraction  was defined  as the
proportion of  VOCs  that  remained  after  repeated washing with water residual
VOCs were subsequently  extracted with hot  acetone. Results demonstrated the
trend toward formation of a residual  sorbed  fraction of VOCs  that increases with
equilibration time.  The  residual  VOC  concentrations varied among the compounds
and  by treatment.  In  general, the alkenes (TCE, tetrachloroethene,  and 1,3-
dichloropropene) produced greater  residual  concentrations than  the  alkanes (carbon
tetrachloride,  1,1,1 -trichloroethane,  1,2-dibromopropane,  1,2-dibromo-3 chloropropane,
and  1,2-dibromoethane).

       Further  studies  (Pignatello, 1990b)  presented  additional data,  demonstrating
the effects of (1)  incubation  time, (2)  initial concentration, and (3) different soil
pretreatments on the  formation of soil  residual  VOC concentrations).  Again,
residual  concentrations increased with incubation time, but  TCE  residual
concentrations  appeared to  level off after 8  days at  a  high loading rate  (TCE-spike
addition  of 104mg/kg). Tetrachloroethene was extremely  fast at forming  a large
residual  concentration; an  order-of-magnitude increase  in residual concentration
after 7 days incubation was observed for tetrachloroethene (0.41  mg/kg  after 1 day
and  5.6 mg/kg after 7 days). The residual  concentrations increased with increasing
concentrations  of  chemical present during  the  sorption  period.   The residual
                                         14

-------
concentrations  showed a log  linear increase with the final  solution  concentration.
The slope of the concentration dependence varied by  compound  for example,
tetrachloroethene, with a slope of 0.90,  had a nearly linear response, and
tetrachloroethene had a slope of 0.73. Residual TCE concentrations  were close  to
half-order in TCE  concentrations in the  medium (slope of 0.49), whether soil was
treated  with pure compound  or  aqueous solution.

      Ball  and Roberts (199la, 1991b)  investigated the long-term  sorption equilibria
of 14C-labeled tetrachloroethene  and  1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene  with  low-carbon
aquifer  material  (organic carbon content of less than 0.021%  in bulk sample,  less
than O.l%  in any  specific particle-size  fraction).  Samples were sterilized and sealed
in glass ampules to avoid losses from  biodegradation  and volatilization. Sorption
was calculated  by  difference from initial  solution concentration  after accounting
for other losses  (e.g., headspace). Compound  recovery  from  blanks  was greater  than
90% during the  100-day  study. Rate  studies  showed that tetrachloroethene sorption
by  the  bulk material reached equilibrium in 30  days  but that pulverized material
reached  sorption equilibrium  within  1 day. The  estimated rate constants  for
pulverized material  were between 40  and 80  times higher than rate  constants for
unaltered solids  (Ball and Roberts, 199 Ib).  The sorption  capacities were essentially
the same for bulk  and pulverized material, indicating  that rapid  sorption
experiments  could be  accomplished using  pulverized  samples. Pulverized samples
had the  added advantage  of  lower relative  errors in sorption  estimates (27.6%
relative error for bulk samples versus 8%  relative  error for pulverized samples;  Ball
and Roberts, 199la). Results  were interpreted  by a physical diffusion model (Ball
and Roberts, 199 Ib).  The effective pore diffusion coefficients were  estimated to be
roughly  2 to 3  orders  of magnitude lower  than bulk aqueous diffusivities in the
aquifer  material  studied.  Diffusive length  was  dramatically  reduced  by pulverizing,
consistent with  the proposed  mechanism of intragranular diffusion  (Ball  and
Roberts,  1991b).

      Sorption  by  specific particle-size  fractions revealed that sorption was  greatest
by the largest size fractions (Ball and Roberts, 199la).  The larger size fractions  had
the greatest  organic  matter contents and the greatest surface  areas on a weight
basis. (The  larger particle-size fractions evidently consisted of soil  aggregates.)
Sorption coefficients exceeded values  predicted  on the basis  of organic partitioning
by an order of magnitude or  more.  Average measured log Kocvalues  were 5.1 and
3.6, and average calculated log  Kocvalues from the literature  were 4.0 for
tetrachlorobenzene  and 2.4 for tetrachloroethene.  Ball and  Roberts (1991a)
                                         15

-------
suggested that either  an exceptionally adsorptive  organic phase existed in the
aquifer material  or that mineral matter was  partly responsible for  the observed
sorption.

       Pavlostathis  and Mathavan (1992) studied (1) the  resorption kinetics of five
field-contaminated  soils  and (2)  the effect of residence time (up to 15 months) on a
laboratory-contaminated  soil.  Resorption  of  TCE,  tetrachloroethylene,  toluene, and
xylene in soil-water mixtures  was biphasic. A  fast resorption  phase was  complete
within 24 h,  followed by a very slow resorption phase.  Methanol extractions of the
soil pellet following centrifugation of the soil-water samples (13 h  at 20 °C, and  30%
soil by weight) showed that a substantial portion of the sorbed contaminant  mass
(48 to 94%) resisted resorption  in deionized water after  7  days. The rate  and extent
of resorption  did  not  correlate with  the soil  properties surveyed  (organic carbon
content, cation exchange capacity, or  specific surface area) or with  the sorbate
water  solubility. In a  separate study, soil spiked with  TCE was treated with sodium
azide to reduce biological activity and was  stored in the  dark at 4 °C. Samples  were
analyzed at  2.5, 5.5, and 15.5 months by six successive washings in deionized water
followed by extraction of the soil  pellet with methanol. The  TCE  that resisted
resorption in water was  10% of the total amount  that sorbed at 2.5  months but
increased  to 45%  of the total amount that sorbed at 15.5 months. The partition
coefficient,  as  observed  by the successive washings, also  increased with time; Kpwas
0.4 mL/g  at 2.5 months  and 1.5  mL/g at 15.5  months.  The amount  of TCE  that
resisted resorption  might be  shown to be  even greater if  a hot methanol extraction
were used (demonstrated by Sawhney et al.  [1988] for EDB-contaminated soil).

VAPOR-SORBED  DISTRIBUTION

       Although sorption of chemicals on saturated soil has been  studied
extensively,  reports  on the  sorption of VOCs  on unsaturated or dry  soils  are
relatively  few. Of  these studies, those that compare  vapor uptake on dry versus
wet soil show that dry soil vapor uptake is greater than that of wet  soils,  is
nonlinear, and is suppressed  by the  presence  of water in a nonlinear manner (Chiou
and Shoup, 1985; Poe et al., 1988; Chiou, 1989; Ong and Lion, 1991a,  1991b; Rhue et alv
1988).  Chiou and Shoup (1985) explain soil as a dual  sorbent in which  the mineral
matter functions as a  conventional  adsorbent  (physically  covering  soil  surfaces) and
organic matter functions as a partition medium.  Polar water molecules are
strongly adsorbed  on  mineral surfaces and  effectively displace  organic compounds
as the  soil  water  content or  relative  humidity increases.  In the absence of water
vapor,  strong  mineral  adsorption of organic vapors exceeds the effect  of
partitioning  with  organic  matter.
                                         16

-------
       Chiou and Shoup (1985) studied the vapor sorption of water and five organics
(benzene, chlorobenzene, p-dichlorobenzene,  m-dichlorobenzene,  and 1,2,4-
trichlorobenzene) on an  oven-dried  (140 °C)  soil.  Gravimetric  determinationsof
VOC  sorption were  performed using  a dynamic, temperature-controlled,  vapor-
sorption apparatus. Results of  soil uptake were plotted  against relative vapor
concentrations  (equilibrium partial pressure  divided by saturation vapor  pressure  of
the compound) to normalize the activity of each compound with respect to its own
pure  state  and to allow  for the comparison  of vapor uptake between different
compounds  and between vapor and normalized  liquid uptake (equilibrium liquid
concentration  divided by the volubility of the  compound)  of the same compound.
Sorption isotherms for  all compounds  on dry  soil were  distinctly nonlinear. The
capacity of the  soil for sorption was greatest for water and the  presence  of water
vapor sharply reduced  the  soil sorption capacity  for the  organic compounds
Water-saturated  sorption was  about 2  orders of magnitude less than dry-soil
sorption of the VOCs Chiou and Shoup (1985) observed that at 90% relative
humidity the vapor  sorption isotherms for  m-dichlorobenzene and  1,2,4-
trichlorobenzene fall  close  to  the  corresponding  isotherms for aqueous solution.
For benzene,  however,  the 90% relative humidity isotherm  deviated from the
aqueous isotherm  (positively) by more than  a  factor of 5. The authors suggested
that  error in the measurement  of  the  relative  humidity may have caused  this
deviation.

       Poe et al. (1988) looked  at vapor phase sorption of five VOCs (benzene,
dichloropropane,  methylcyclohexane,  ethyl  ether,  and  methanol) on  four  air-dry
soils  and found consistent  adsorption  capacities  among them. The  relative order  of
adsorption  in  the four  soils remained the same regardless of the chemical
compound.  The soil  that had the  highest clay content and  largest surface area
adsorbed the greatest amount of each  VOC.  For the two  soils that had similar clay
content and surface  area, however, the soil that  sorbed the  greatest  amount of
VOCs had  a  lower  organic carbon content,  suggesting that  organic matter may
block mineral surface sites.  Both Poe et al.  (1988) and Chiou and Shoup (1985) found
that  sorption increases  as compound polarity increases.

       Ong  and Lion (199la) used a  headspace technique  to  study the sorption  of
TCE  over a range of moisture  contents by soil components, viz., alumina, hydrated
ferric  oxide, montmorillonite,  kaolinite,  and humic-coated alumina.  They found
that sorption by oven-dry solids was 2 to 4  orders of magnitude greater than
sorption by wet solids.  A description of vapor sorption as a function  of moisture
content was presented  (Figure  2).  When moisture contents  ranged from oven-dry  to
water  sufficient  to  provide  monolayer  coverage of solid  surfaces,  vapor sorption
                                        17

-------
decreased linearly with  moisture  content. Water sufficient to form 1 to 5
monolayer on solid  surfaces  exhibited  complex behavior, attributed to interactions
between TCE vapor  and surface-bound  water.  At  approximately five  monolayer
of water a  sorption minimum was observed, and above five monolayer sorption
increased slightly with moisture  content. Ong and Lion (199la) showed that the
gradual increase in sorption at  moisture contents  greater  than five  monolayer
could be accounted  for  by vapor dissolution, as predicted by Henry's Law constant
(see Vapor-Aqueous  Distribution  Section below). Five monolayer of water
corresponds to 25% moisture by  weight on the high-surface area alumina and to
2.9% moisture by weight  on the low-surface area kaolinite  in this  study.

      Gravimetric studies of TCE and water vapor  sorption on soil  minerals
(montmorillonite, kaolinite, iron  oxide,  silica, and alumina)  and on humic-coated
alumina and  humic acid showed that  surface area serves as  a good measure  of the
adsorptive capacity of dry solids (Ong and Lion, 199 Ib). However, variability in
relative sorption isotherms among the sorbents  (calculated  as the  ratio  of the
sorbed  quantity to the monolayer capacity)  demonstrated that  other factors  are also
involved.  Specific  sorbate-sorbent interactions  and vapor condensation in
micropores are  cited to explain the variability  among  sorbents. Sorption of TCE
onto the mineral solids  in the presence of water at  several levels  of relative
humidity (RH)  showed  that the polar water molecules are  sorbed preferentially
over the nonpolar VOCs  Addition of water to  humic  acid resulted in  a large
increase in the amount of TCE sorbed; TCE sorption by humic acid at 80%  RH was
much greater than at  O% RH and much greater than  saturated aqueous sorption.
Expansion  of the oven-dry humic acid due to hydration and exposure of internal
surfaces for  sorption/condensation as  the RH increases was  proposed.  Although
montmorillonite also  expands with the  addition of water, its sorption capacity  for
TCE  decreased,  indicating that the interlamellar pores  were  not readily available
for the  uptake of TCE.

      Equilibrium vapor-phase adsorption of VOCs  is  described by the  classical
Brunauer-Emmett-Teller  (BET) isotherm (Jurinak and  Volman,  1957;  Chiou  and
Shoup,  1985  Poe et al., 1988; Rhue et  al.,  1988), indicating that multimolecular layer
adsorption occurs. At  very high vapor pressures, increased uptake  of VOCs
through vapor  condensation  is regulated by available pore space (Ong and Lion,
199 Ib).  This  effect is most likely to occur close to  field sources of contamination,
such as nonaqueous-phase organic liquids.

      Vapor sorption of VOCs has not been shown in the  field, but Ong and Lion
(199la)  suggest that field  conditions dry enough to permit vapor sorption exist.
                                        18

-------

A
o>
o
£
0)
o
o
c
«.
h.
o
in
1
<^

t
V
\
\
\
\
\
2
<^








\
\
\
V
3


1. OVEN-DRY TO SINGLE
>,



SURFACE MONOLAYER Ol

2. 1-5 SURFACE WATER I

3. >5 MONO-LAYERS OF S
WATER


	 «"j

.AY

URI



— — •
                   Moisture Content (%)
Figure  2. Vapor phase  sorption  as a function  of moisture content
                  (after Ong and Lion,  199la.)
                              19

-------
 Vapor  extraction  systems generally  require moist air to improve  the  efficiency  of
 vapor removal (V. Fong, personal communication). Smith et  al.  (1990) found that
 vapor sorption would not be  important  at the Picatinny Arsenal  in New  Jersey. In
 the  laboratory, they  measured the vapor-phase sorption of TCE  and water using
 the  experimental apparatus of Chiou and Shoup  (1985). As an example, a  surface
 soil sample of 4% organic carbon and 13.5% clay reached water  vapor saturation at
 6%  moisture  on a weight basis.  The vapor  saturation  soil-moisture  content is
 defined as the mass  of water  sorbed by the  soil in equilibrium with water  vapor at
 its saturation vapor  pressure.  The field  soil moisture  concentrations were  all much
 greater than the  vapor  saturation moisture contents  (on the  day these were
 sampled)  and thus they concluded that  vapor-phase  sorption was unimportant at
 this site.

 VAPOR-AQUEOUS  DISTRIBUTION

       Vapor-aqueous equilibrium distributions  for dilute solutions at  or below  one
 atmosphere pressure  are directly proportional.  Henry's Law states  that the
 equilibrium distribution  of a compound, i, between gas and liquid phases is linearly
 related

                                     P= H.X,

 where Ptis  the partial pressure of compound i, H^s  Henry's Law constant for
 compound i at a given  temperature,  and Xi is the mole fraction of compound i.
 The distribution can  be  expressed in terms of the concentration  of a compound  in a
 liquid, yielding a  proportionality  constant,  or Henry's  constant, that  has units of
 kPa  nr'molXor arm  rn'mol"1).  Also,  a dimensionless form  of Henry's  constant (gas
 phase molarity/liquid phase molarity) is  common; this  form is related  to the  other
 two  constants by  expressing the gaseous partial pressure in terms of moles through
 the ideal gas law.

      Although strictly  applicable only for dilute solutions, Henry's Law has been
 found to persist to the point of saturation  for many  chemicals  (Spencer and  Cliath,
 1970). Hence, the dimensionless Henry's Law constant, KH, may be calculated as  the
ratio of saturated vapor  density, C0*  (g/m3), to water solubility,  CL*(g/m3)

                                  K =  r */C *
                                  rvH   *^a >^L •

Further  evaluation of the use  of  vapor  pressure and  volubility  data  to  estimate
Henry's constants was reported by Munz and Roberts (1987) who  found good
                                        20

-------
agreement between  experimental  and predicted values for seven  halocarbons
(bromoform,  hexachloroethane,  chloroform,  TCE,  1,1,1-trichloroethane,  carbon
tetrachloride,  and dichlorodifluoromethane)  and poor  agreement for  one compound
(tetrachloroethene). They suggested that  errors in the estimation of Henry's Law
constant occur due to the wide range of volubility  values  reported in the literature
for many compounds. No effect of solute concentration on the  Henry's Law
constant for the solute was observed for solute-liquid mole fractions  as  large as 103
(Munz and Roberts, 1987).

      For soil that  is saturated or unsaturated, but  not dry, Henry's Law constants
can be  used  to  estimate the distribution of a VOC between the  liquid and gaseous
phases  The effect of temperature  on Henry's  Law  constant  must be  considered
Henry's Law constant increases by a factor of approximately 1.6  for every 10 °C rise
in temperature (Munz and  Roberts,  1987).  Data to  demonstrate the effect of
temperature (10  °C and 30 °C) on the Henry's Law  constant of five VOCs can be
found in Munz and Roberts (1987).

NAPL-AQUEOUS/VAPOR  DISTRIBUTIONS

      Soil contamination by a NAPL (e.g.,  gasoline, chlorinated solvents) produces a
residual soil-NAPL fraction. Pools or "gaglia"  of  pure phase  liquid are retained in
pore spaces by  capillary forces. The  residual NAPL saturation,  or amount of
NAPL that will be held against gravity,  depends on the soil  pore  structure but is
estimated to range from  5 to  40% of the  pore space of most  soils. With time, the
residual  fraction dissipates  by  volatilization and  solubilization.  Complex NAPL
mixtures,  such as petroleum derived fuels and lubricants, change in  composition  as
the volatile and  soluble  components weather in chemical  sequence from the
residual fraction (Bouchard et  al., 1990).

      The release of a VOC  from residual NAPL  will be governed by (1) the VOC
volubility in  combination with the rate of water flowing through the soil and (2)
the VOC volatility  in combination with the vapor  concentration gradients and
pressure gradients acting  on the vapor phase. The aqueous volubility of some
chlorinated solvents  alone  and in  binary  mixtures  was reported by Broholm et al.
(1992).  Solubilities at 23 °C to 24  °C ranged from 242 mg/L  for tetrachloroethene to
8,668 mg/L for  chloroform. The chlorinated  solvents exhibit  ideal  behavior in
mixtures.  That is, the aqueous  concentration of a  compound  can be predicted  by
the mole  fraction  of the compound in the organic phase.
                                        21

-------
SUMMARY  OF INTERPHASE TRANSFERS

       Rapid sorption of VOCs  by wet or moist soils  is generally predicted from the
organic-carbon  partitioning  coefficient  (Koc) for the compound and  from the soil
organic  carbon content.  The Kocis estimated  through  empirical  log-log correlations
with  the octanol-water partitioning coefficient (Kow) or water volubility of the
compound.  An order-of-magnitude error is associated  with the 95% confidence
limits  of these correlations  (Hassett and Banwart, 1989). Deviations from  predicted
values by a factor of 3  may be attributed to  qualitative differences  in soil organic
matter (Rutherford et al., 1992). Sorption  is  controlled by mechanisms  other than
organic  partitioning  and Koc predictions are indefensible if (1) the soil contains  less
than 0.1% organic carbon (or 0.2% organic matter) or  (2) the compounds contain
polar functional  groups (e.g, ketones or nitriles).

       Slow sorption processes,  termed "nonequilibrium sorption"  are believed to be
controlled by  diffusion within  soil organic matter (intraorganic diffusion)  or by
diffusion into  soil micropores.   Following  the initial rapid "equilibrium" sorption
phase, an estimated  100% greater sorption may  occur  given sufficient time
(Brusseau and  Rao, 1989). With time, the  soluble, volatile, and easily desorbed
phases dissipate,  and the nonequilibrium fraction becomes  the dominant form of
soil contamination (Steinberg et al., 1987). The  significance of the nonequilibrium
fraction  will be  defined by  the prevalence of this phenomenon and the resulting
rates  of resorption. No data are  available  for identifying rates and conditions
under  which nonequilibrium VOCs are released.

       Dry  soil sorbs 2 to 4 orders of magnitude more volatile compounds than the
same  soil sorbs  when  wet.  Vapor  sorption proceeds by physical  adsorption, rather
than by  organic  partitioning. Polar water molecules  rapidly  and  effectively
displace  surface-adsorbed VOCs The  significance of vapor  sorption under field
conditions has  not been documented, but  cannot be dismissed without  investigation.

       Vapor-aqueous distributions of VOCs are  predicted using Henry's Law con-
stants.  The  values are  often estimated  by the ratio  of the  saturated vapor density
to the  water volubility of a  compound. Henry's  Law constants increase by a factor
of approximately  1.6 for every 10  °C rise in temperature (Munz and Roberts,  1987).

       Residual NAPL  saturation in soil is a  function of soil  porosity and  is not
predicted by Koc sorption.  Contamination by NAPLs results  in a  NAPL residual
saturation fraction held  by capillary forces  (against gravity)  in soil pores  (Bouchard
etal., 1990).
                                        22

-------
                                    SECTION 3

                                 DEGRADATION
       VOCs may be lost from the  soil or a soil sample by either microbiological or
abiotic  degradation. A  comparison  of sterilized and viable  samples is  generally
used  to  distinguish between  the  degradation mechanisms.   Field  studies, and
occasionally  laboratory studies, commonly  report dissipation rates because
additional pathways of chemical  losses (volatilization,  sorption, or movement with
soil water) are not measured during the study.  This section discusses reports  on
microbiological  and abiotic  degradation, and on the factors affecting  degradation
rates.

MICROBIOLOGICAL  DEGRADATION

       Although microorganisms are sharply reduced in number and kind with  soil
depth, significant  microbial  degradation occurs  for some  chemicals throughout  the
vadose zone  and into saturated substrata (e.g. Wilson et  al., 1983; Barker et al.,  1987;
Sulfita, 1989). Data on the biodegradation  of many organic  compounds in soil is
summarized  by  Dragun  (1988). It is  evident that the experimental conditions
influence results,  and that published  values used to estimate  biodegradation rates
must  be carefully evaluated before equating results to field or sample storage
conditions.

       Soil microbiological transformation  of low-molecular-weight aliphatic and
aromatic hydrocarbons  figures  prominently in the  environmental  fate  of these
compounds.  Generally,  the shorter  the hydrocarbon  chain, the more rapid the
oxidative biodegradation (Alexander,  1977). For  example,  bacteria able to oxidize
volatile hydrocarbons proliferate in the vicinity  of natural gas leaks,  consuming
available  02and  creating locally O2-deficit  regions  (Alexander,  1977). Benzene,
toluene,  xylene,  ethylbenzene, and naphthalene exist in a  dynamic state in  soils, and
they are both synthesized by and destroyed by microorganisms  (Alexander,  1977;
Dragun,  1988). The total biological oxygen demand for degrading  these aromatics is
very large (values such as 9 moles  of 02per mole of toluene),  which implies that
the subsurface  degradation will be limited frequently  by  02 diffusion.

      Barker et al. (1987) studied the  biodegradation of benzene, toluene, and m-, p-,
o-xylene injected  into the water table  in a  shallow sand  aquifer in Borden,  Ontario.
Essentially complete  removal  of a field-injected pulse was reported within about 1.2
                                        23

-------
years; benzene  was the most persistently retained compound in the system.
Horizontal layers of near-zero dissolved oxygen  in  the  saturated strata
corresponded to contaminant  persistence 32 days after injection. This finding
confirmed that  diffusion of oxygen was controlling the field  biodegradation  rates.
Laboratory  experiments with  anaerobic  microcosms  and  sealed  vials demonstrated
that the losses  could be attributed to biodegradation under aerobic conditions.
Phenolic  and acidic  breakdown products were  detected in anaerobic microcosms.
Results in septum-sealed vials snowed zero-order kinetics  and lack  of anaerobic
transformation products,  indicating that oxygen  leaked  into  the  vials.  Laboratory
zero-order rate  constants  were  compared  with field  ground-water degradation  rate
constants, and the  laboratory rate  was about 1.5 times the field rate  for benzene and
toluene. Field rates were  higher than laboratory  rates for  m-  and p-xylene.

       Halogenated aromatics  degrade only under aerobic  conditions  (Kobayashi
and Rittman, 1982). Wilson et al.  (1983) found chlorobenzene to biodegrade at a rate
of  approximately 5% per  week under aerobic  conditions, although there was  no
significant degradation under anaerobic conditions.  Vadose  material  collected  from
depths  of 1.2 and 3.0 m showed degradation of chlorobenzene, but no degradation
was observed in aquifer materials (5-m  depth)  or in autoclaved (sterilized) samples
(Wilson et al., 1983). Wilson and McNabb (1983) found 1,2-dichlorobenzene and 1,4-
dichlorobenzene  much more  likely to degrade  than  1,3-dichlorobenzene in aquifer
material.

       In  contrast to  the  compounds  discussed  above, microbial degradation of
volatile aliphatic chlorinated  hydrocarbons  occurs primarily  by  reductive
dehalogenation,  that  is, the replacement of chlorine  by  hydrogen under  anaerobic
conditions (Smith and Dragun,  1984). Reductive  dehalogenation  of
tetrachloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane,  TCE,  and  tetrachloromethane  has  been
demonstrated at Eh values below 300 mV and pH 6.8 to  7.0,  although carbon-
halogen bonds do not  rupture in microcosms devoid  of viable microorganisms
(Parsons et al.,  1985). Such highly reducing conditions do not  commonly occur in
most soils but could  occur in  water-logged soils, under landfills, or in highly
contaminated soils  exposed to fluctuating  water tables.

       Cline  and Viste (1985) have shown that anaerobic  degradation  of chlorinated
solvents occurs  under  landfills and under solvent recovery plants. Three  landfills
used  for disposal of municipal and industrial wastes  received the parent compounds
(solvents) 1,1,1-trichloroethane,  TCE,  and tetrachloroethene.  Breakdown products
included dichloroethanes, chloroethane, dichloroethenes (cis- and trans-),  and  vinyl
chloride.  The breakdown  products dominated  in  ground  water downgradient  from
                                        24

-------
the waste  disposal boundaries.  Data from  solvent recovery  sites  and an  industrial
site  showed  that  locations  receiving both  chlorinated and  nonchlorinated  solvents
had  much higher percentages of breakdown products downgradient than  sites
receiving  only chlorinated  solvents. The authors concluded  that the nonchlorinated
carbon  source promotes rapid co-metabolism of  the chlorinated solvents by
microorganisms.

      The reaction of  vinyl  chloride  is  a notable exception to anaerobic
degradation among the halogenated aliphanes.  It is often a  breakdown product of
other, more  highly chlorinated  compounds and is highly persistent under anaerobic
conditions. In contrast, vinyl chloride degrades  rapidly  under aerobic  conditions
(Sims, 1990; Hartmans  and  de Bent, 1992).  Dragun (1988) reports chloroethane as a
degradation product,  and  Hartmans  and  de Bent (1992)  observed an  intermediate
epoxide chlorooxirane  degradation product (a reactive species), but subsequent
degradation products  were  not identified.

      No  detectable  degradation of 1,2-dichloroethane, l,l,2~trichloroethane,  TCE, or
tetrachloroethene  was found in soil and sediment samples  collected near Lula,
Oklahoma, from vadose depths  of 1.2 and 3 m and from below the  water table at 5
m (Wilson et al.,  1983). These  compounds were  highly refractory in a related
laboratory  study that  found no  degradation when samples were incubated  for 16
weeks in a N2 atmosphere.   The  same  study  found that  bromodichloromethane  was
degraded in  sediment from the saturated zone,  chlorobenzene was  degraded in
vadose  soil,  and toluene was  rapidly degraded by microorganisms in soil collected at
all depths. There  was no detectable degradation  of  any  of the chemicals tested
after  the  soils were  autoclave.

      Under certain  circumstances,  such as in the presence  of natural gas,
oxidation  and dechlorination  of halogenated  aliphanes may  occur. A study  by
Wilson  and Wilson (1985)  showed that  TCE  was rapidly  and effectively removed
from  a  soil column exposed to  a stream  of natural gas (0.6%). Soil  columns poisoned
with sodium azide, or in the  absence of natural  gas, allowed significantly  more TCE
to pass through.  Enzymes  produced by  methanotrophs were credited with the
degradation of TCE  in the  soil exposed to natural gas.  The authors  concluded  that
other chlorinated  aliphanes  will also  undergo oxidation  and  dechlorination in the
presence of natural gas.
                                        25

-------
 ABIOTIC  DEGRADATION

       Mineral  surfaces often serve  as  catalysts  for abiotic  organic  reactions such as
 hydrolysis,  elimination, substitution, redox, and  polymerization  (e.g. a review by
 Voudrias and Reinhard,  1986) Transition metal  cations on or in clays can act as
 Lewis acids by accepting  electrons  from organic compounds. The  dissociation of
 water coordinated to  exchangeable  cations of clays results in Bronsted  acidity.  At
 low water content, the Bronsted sites may produce  extreme acidities at  the  clay
 surface.  Dragun (1988) lists benzene, ethylbenzene,  naphthalene,  and toluene as
 chemicals  that  may undergo free-radical oxidation  in soil.  Reactivity  on clay
 surfaces is highly specific  and is  most commonly observed with compounds that
 have polar functional  groups.  For  example,  acetonitrile undergoes  hydrolysis to
 form acetamide  in  the presence of  a Wyoming  bentonite, but not in the presence of
 a  Montana vermiculite  (Dragun, 1988). Although abiotic degradation of some
 compounds on  some soils  may  occur, the  extent of such reactions cannot be
 estimated from  available  data.

       Chemicals that may rapidly polymerize in the presence of water  include  at
 least three VOCs: acrolein, acrylonitrile, and vinyl acetate  (Dragun, 1988). Vinyl
 acetate has been removed  from the Revised  Priority List of Hazardous  Substances
 (56  FR 52169,17 October 1991), and information on the environmental significance of
 the  polymerization  reaction for  the  other two compounds was not  found.

       Abiotic  reactions of chlorinated  aliphatic  VOCs  in water have  been
 documented.  Hydrolysis  and oxidation,  the principal chemical  reactions,  yield
 products that tend  to be water-soluble intermediates  which  are  often  difficult to
 detect at trace  levels.  Evidence for these reactions  is, therefore, the disappearance
 of the chemical under  sterile conditions at carefully  controlled temperatures.
 Tetrachloroethene and  TCE have  been reported  to degrade  in water,  with half-lives
 of about 0.75 and 0.9 years, respectively, at room temperature (Dilling et al.,  1975).
 The  hydrolysis of 1,1,1-trichloroethane has been  reported with a  half-life of 0.5 to 0.8
years at 25 °C (Dilling et al., 1975).

       Hydrolysis rates reported  for  a given chemical can vary over a  few orders of
magnitude  depending  on  initial concentration or on  procedural  differences. The
hydrolysis  half-life  of trichloromethane  has been reported as 1.25 years  Dilling   et
al., 1975) and 3,500 years (Mabey and Mill,  1978). Similarly, the hydrolysis half-life
for dichloromethane is reported as  1.5 years Dilling et al.,  1975)  and 700 years
(Mabey and Mill, 1978).  Smith and Dragun (1984) suggested that if  the longer half-
lives (calculated from  kinetic studies carried  out at elevated temperatures) are
                                        26

-------
reliable, the shorter  experimental values must  result from  processes  other  than
hydrolysis.  However, variable  hydrolysis  half-lives  reported  for
tetrachloromethane, i.e.,  7 years at 1,000 mg/L and 7,000 years at 1 mg/L, have been
attributed to a  hydrolysis  reaction that is second order  in tetrachloromethane
(Mabey and Mill, 1978).

       Recognizing variation  in the  data, these  values all suggest  that hydrolysis
should  not  interfere  with  typical laboratory  procedures to measure halogenated
alkanes in water over holding times  of a  few days.  Hydrolysis rates in the presence
of soil  may be  slower or faster than those reported  in  water, depending  on the soil
and  compound-specific effects of pH, Eh, sorption,  or  surface-catalyzed reactions_
Abiotic soil degradation studies  are inherently  less  conclusive than studies  in water
as exemplified in the study of Anderson et al. (1991) reviewed below.

FACTORS   AFFECTING  DEGRADATION RATES

       When biotransformation  does occur, it will usually be more rapid than
abiotic  transformation (Vogel et  al.,  1981  Dragun, 1988). Environmental half-lives
from abiotic processes for halogenated  aliphatic  compounds are generally on the
order of years to hundreds  of years (Vogel et al.,  1987), although the same
compounds  exhibit half-lives  of days to weeks  in the presence  of microbially active
soil  or  static-flask  culture  conditions (Dragun,  1988). Unfortunately, however,  soil
biodegradation  rates  elude  quantitative description.  Dragun (1988) discusses some of
the reasons that estimation techniques  have not been devised,  including the many
soil  and environmental  factors that influence biodegradation  rates  and the widely
varying protocols and lack of studies to relate  protocols  used in biodegradation
studies. Some general guidelines  are  given, such  as:  (1) increasing the number  of
chlorine atoms  within the  molecule decreases the biodegradation  rate;  (2) water
soluble chemicals are usually degraded faster than less  water  soluble chemicals; (3)
unsaturated  aliphatic organics  have  faster biodegradation rates than  corresponding
saturated aliphatic  organics;  and  (4)  n-alkanes,  n-alkylaromatics, and  aromatic
hydrocarbons in the  C5to C9 range  are biodegradable, but in most environments
volatilization competes very  effectively  with biodegradation as  a fate  process.

      Smith and Dragun (1984)  suggested that laboratory-derived  half-lives should
be taken as  lower  limits (the most rapid that could  be  expected), and not necessarily
the half-lives expected to be found under field conditions.  In contrast,  Barker et  al.
(1987) demonstrated  that laboratory-derived rates  were  slower than field- measured
degradation  rates for m- and p-xylene  (in water-saturated  strata).  The  initial
concentration of a  substrate can  change the  kinetics  of degradation, as  shown  by
                                         27

-------
 Boethling and Alexander (1979) and by Mabey and Mill (1978). Trace levels of
 organic  compounds will degrade  at much  slower rates than at higher
 concentrations.  Also,  it is likely  that many  laboratory studies  involving  VOCs  have
 unaccounted volatile losses or sorption  "losses" that  increase the apparent
 degradation half-life (e.g. Anderson et al., 1991; discussed below).

       Pavlostathis and  Jaglal (1991) have  argued that organic  pollutants buried
 within micropores of soil  aggregates are, for the most part, inaccessible to
 microorganisms. Many soil bacteria range in  size from 0.5  to 0.8 [am, and more  than
 half the pore volume  in a silt loam soil may be  represented by pores of radii less
 than  1  [jm.  Therefore,  the contaminant in solution  generally  constitutes  the
 readily bioavailable fraction,  and resorption  rates will greatly influence the
 biodegradation  rate of  sorbed compounds. Evidence  for the bioavailability  of
 chemicals in solution  has been demonstrated  by Steinberg et al. (1987).  They found
 that EDB residues in old  tobacco field soil had  resisted  degradation even though
 fresh 14C EDB  additions degraded relatively  rapidly.

       One recent study attempted a mass balance of VOCs incubated in soil in the
 laboratory (Anderson et al., 1991). The  study followed the  disappearance rate of 15
 volatile  and  semivolatile organic  compounds  in two  soils using experimental
 procedures to  distinguish between biodegradation and  abiotic  losses  (including
 volatilization).  Chemicals  included in the study and  reported half-lives  are  shown
 in Table  2. All samples were incubated in  the  dark at  20 °C. Losses were
 attributed to "abiotic processes" because differences in disappearance of organic
 compounds between sterile (autoclave 1 h  on 3  consecutive days)  and nonsterile
 samples  were not  significant. Sterilization  was checked by measuring  CO2 efflux
 for the experimental period of 7  days  and by incubation of soil  extracts on nutrient
 agar plates.

       In this study, dissipation of 14C toluene was traced in one of the  soils
 (Anderson et al., 1991).  After 7  days, 20%  of the recoverable radioactivity was in the
 charcoal traps (volatile  losses), 4% was  recovered in soil methanol extracts (cold),
 and 65% was associated with the  soil organic matter  (extracted twice with NaOH),
 leaving at least 10% unaccounted for.  The authors stated that  short-term spike  and
 recovery  analyses of individual  compounds yielded consistent recoveries,  which
were used as correction factors.  Mass balances in sterile  soils were not obtained.
 The  authors  suggested that problems with storage and  holding  times  or  possibly
nonreversible sorption contributed  to losses. Spike levels were  a nominal  100 mg
for each  chemical/kg soil  dry weight. To minimize  volatilization, however,
chemicals were  not  mixed  when added  to the soil. This procedure  may have caused
                                        28

-------
 TABLE 2  LABORATORY  DISSIPATION HALF-LIVES OF  SOME  ORGANIC
	COMPOUNDS*

 Compound                                      Half-life  (days)
benzene
ethylene dibromide
toluene
cis- 1 ,4-dichloro-2-butene
chlorobenzene
pxylene
1 ,2,3 -trichloropropane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
chloroform
methyl ethyl ketone
carbon tetrachloride
tetrahydrofuran
nitrobenzene
2-chloronaphthalene
hexachlorobenzene
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.7
4.0
4.1
4.9
5.0
5.7
9.1
11.3
11.3
  Data from Anderson et al., 1991
locally toxic levels of some compounds in the soils and may have limited the
opportunity for the compounds to contact  soil  microbes.  Organic  partitioning
appeared to be the major sink for toluene (soil had 1.5% organic  carbon),  and  this
toluene  was  not  recovered by soil extraction with cold methanol.

SUMMARY  OF DEGRADATION

      Degradation of naturally occurring  aromatics (e.g., BTEX compounds) is
likely to be  caused by microorganisms in aerobic soils, but abiotic degradation is
also plausible (Dragun, 1988). The biodegradation rate of such compounds has been
shown to be limited by oxygen diffusion (Barker et al., 1987). Degradation of

                                      29

-------
halogenated aromatics is similar  to that of the unhalogenated  aromatics  in  that it  is
predominantly aerobic biodegradation.  The  degradation  rate  of halogenated
aromatics,  however, is generally  slower than that  of the  unhalogenated species
(Dragun, 1988).

      Halogenated aliphatic compounds (e.g.,  chloroform,  TCE)  degrade by
reductive dehalogenation, that is, the replacement  of the  halogen by hydrogen
under anaerobic  conditions. Biomediated dehalogenation occurs  as  a consequence
of microbial degradation of other organic  carbon sources,  or co-metabolism (Cline
and Viste,  1985;  Wilson and Wilson, 1985). Abiotic dehalogenation has also been
reported, but  estimates of abiotic half-lives in water vary  widely (e.galess than 2
years Billing et al., 1975] and more than 700 years  [Mabey  and  Mill,  1978] for
dichloromethane).

      The kinetics of degradation are  affected by many  factors,  including  the
substrate concentration (Boethling and Alexander, 1979; Mabey  and Mill,  1978).
Laboratory  estimates  of degradation rates  cannot be applied directly to  field
situations,  and comparisons  among laboratory  studies are  subject to  artifacts of
differences  among  procedures.  Sterile  control  conditions are difficult to verify and
volatile  losses during  experimental procedures are difficult to  avoid (Anderson et
al, 1991).
                                        30

-------
                                     SECTION 4

                 MOVEMENT OF  VOCS IN THE  VADOSE ZONE
       VOCs may move through  soil by diffusion of the vapor or aqueous phases,  or
 by advection  or convection1 of the vapor, aqueous,  or  NAPL phases. This section
 first provides  general  discussions  of studies on vapor diffusion, vapor advection,
 aqueous  convection,  and volatilization. Field  studies are  then reviewed separated
 into (1) studies  that had a priori data concerning the time  and amount of  soil
 contamination and  (2) studies where the  objective of the  field investigation was to
 describe  the  concentration  or extent of soil  contamination.

 VAPOR  DIFFUSION

       In general,  vapor diffusion will  dominate  the  soil movement of compounds
 with high vapor pressures (Taylor and Ashcroft, 1972; Kreamer et  al.,  1988). The
 rates  of vapor diffusion in  soil are  obviously  slower than in free  air. "Effective"
 soil diffusion  coefficients are  influenced by the tortuosity of the channels, which is
 estimated by such  parameters as overall  porosity and the volumetric  air and  water
 saturation levels.  The  Millington-Quirk tortuosity  formula  (Millington  and  Quirk,
 1961)2is  frequently used to estimate soil vapor diffusion coefficients (e.g.,  Jury et
 al., 1983  Sleep and Sykes, 1989). A summary of formulas for estimating soil
 diffusion  coefficients and values  calculated for many VOCs using the Millington-
 Quirk  equation is  given by  Roy  and Griffin  (1990).  In general, effective  diffusion
 coefficients for VOCs  are estimated at 0.1  to 0.4  mVday, depending on porosity
 variables, temperature,  and  compound.
   'The terms "advection" and "convection" refer to movement due to bulk flow of a phase. Here, the
term "advection" is used for bulk flow of the gas and NAPL phases and "convection" for bulk flow of the
aqueous phase.

   2Millington and Quirk (1961) reported the empirically derived formula for effective gas diffusion
coefficients, Dge, in unsaturated soil as:
                                   D,, = (a1(V3«t.-2)Dg*

where a is the gas-filled porosity, <|> is the total soil porosity, and Dg* is the diffusion coefficient in air.
The factors that compose the coefficient modifying Dg* are often termed the "tortuosity" of the medium.
It should be noted that the tortuosity varies with soil  moisture content.

                                          31

-------
       Use  of the term  "diffusion coefficient" varies among groups of researchers.
 Studies  may  define  a lumped effective diffusion  coefficient  or unapparent
 diffusion coefficient  to  refer  to  the  observation of a combined diffusion/retardation
 coefficient.

 VAPOR ADVECTION

       At the soil surface,  gaseous advection due to changes in barometric pressure,
 temperature gradients, rainfall or  irrigation,  or  wind  are  generally said to
 penetrates to  depths  of many centimeters.  For  example,  a 2-mbar  change in
 barometric pressure is estimated to cause air replacement to a  depth of 8 cm in  12  h
 (Taylor  and Ashcroft, 1972, p. 367).  At the  soil surface, temperature  gradients will
 generally move vapors  downward during the day  and upward during the night,
 moving from warm to cold areas (Hillel,  1971, pg. 118).

       The effect of  barometric fluctuations below  1 m is  generally small (Kreamer
 et al., 1988).  Massmann and Farrier (1992), however examined situations in which
 the barometric  fluctuations  might be significant.  They argued that some storm
 systems  can produce  barometric pressure changes of 20 to 30 mbar during a 24-h
 period and  that these storm circumstances  can occur several times  a  year or more,
 depending on the geographical location. Model calculations showed  that  "fresh air
 may  migrate  several  meters into  a highly  permeable  subsurface during  such  large
 barometric pressure  cycles  and the depth of penetration  increases as the thickness
 and permeability of the vadose zone  increase.  Massmann and  Farrier (1992) thus
 suggested that the  concentration of gaseous  VOCs may be lower  when barometric
 pressures are  high  and  that soil gas  measurements will show  the  largest fluctuations
 during times  of rapidly rising  or falling barometric  pressures. Their analysis,
 however, omitted the  effects of soil water on gas  permeability and on diffusion
 coefficients.

       Falta et al.  (1989) have suggested that gas phase advection may dominate the
 transport of VOCs that  originate  from  a NAPL in soils of high permeability. As
 organic liquids  that have high vapor  pressures  and low molecular weights
 evaporate, the density of the gas  in contact with the liquid changes with respect to
 the ambient soil gas. This  density contrast results in an advective  gas flow.
 Organic  hydrocarbons and  solvents have vapor  densities that  are greater than air,
 so the resulting  density-driven flows will be downward. Falta et  al.  (1989) cited the
 contamination of ground water beneath waste  management facilities at Idaho
National Engineering  Laboratory  (INEL) as  a likely example  of this phenomenon.
At INEL, the water table is 177  m deep and yet carbon tetrachloride, present in the
                                        32

-------
waste, has been found in the  ground water. The magnitude  of density-driven flows
is a function  of the  saturated  vapor pressure  of the organic liquid, the gas-phase
permeability,  and the  gas-phase  retardation  coefficient.  Contaminants that  are
likely to be affected  by density-driven flow include TCE,  chloroform,  1,1,1-
trichloroethane,  methylene  chloride,  1,2-dichloroethene,  1,2-dichloroethane,  1,1-
dichloroethane, carbon  tetrachloride,  Freon 113, and possibly benzene.
Contaminants  that are  not  likely  to  be affected by density-driven flow include
toluene,  ethylbenzene,  xylene,  chlorobenzene,  naphthalene,  and phenols (Falta et  al.,
1989).

AQUEOUS  CONVECTION

      Aqueous  convection of VOCs refers to the  movement of the  VOCs dissolved
in soil  solution. Gravity flow predominates,  but  evapotranspiration  moves water
and  dissolved species upward in the soil surface. Lappala  and Thompson (1983)
suggested that ground-water convection  can also affect VOC movement.  They
postulated  that  the frequency  and  magnitude  of ground-water  level  fluctuations
may provide  the driving force for moving ground-water  contaminants into the
vapor phase.  If the  capillary fringe  is  lowered into contaminated ground  water,  the
previously  clean capillary water  becomes  increasingly mixed with contaminated
water during  recurring  fluctuations.  VOCs can then  volatilize into  air-filled pores,
thus establishing a vertical concentration gradient in the soil gas phase.

VOLATILIZATION-GASEOUS  DIFFUSION  AND  AQUEOUS  CONVECTION
COMBINED

      Volatilization refers to the  gaseous  loss of chemicals to the  atmosphere  from
the soil  surface. The potential volatility of a  chemical is  related to its inherent
vapor pressure.  Actual  volatilization from  soil depends  on interphase transfers,
movement  to  the  soil  surface, and vaporization  into the atmosphere.

      The  rate at which a chemical moves away from the surface is  controlled
primarily by diffusion.  There is relatively  little air movement close  to the soil
surface  consequently, a vaporized substance is  transported  from the soil surface
through this  stagnant air boundary layer  only by  molecular  diffusion.  The rate of
movement  away from  the  surface will  be proportional to  the diffusion  coefficient
and  the vapor density  of the chemical  at  the evaporating  surface. Factors  such as
wind velocity and  surface  cover  (plants)  alter volatilization through their  effect on
the thickness  of the  stagnant air  layer.
                                        33

-------
       Jury  et al. (1990) simulated volatilization of chemicals that resided  in
subsurface soils. They  amended the  input data for some of the  chemicals with
results reported in Jury et al. (1992). They calculated relative volatile losses for 35
organic chemicals placed in a 30-cm-thick layer 100 cm  below a soil surface. Two
uniform  soil conditions were  simulated  in soils  of sandy or clayey  texture and (1)
with no  water  evaporation or (2) at  a low, steady 0.1  cm/day water evaporation rate.
Results showed that  when  no water evaporation occurred,  four  compounds would
lose more than 50% of the initial concentration  by surface  volatilization  in the
sandy  soil over the first  year.  These four compounds were dichlorodifluoro-
methane,  chloromethane,  1,1,1-trichloroethane,  and  bromoethane. Only
dichlorodifluoromethane lost more than  50% by  volatilization under analogous
conditions in the clay soil. When water evaporation was simulated, seven chemicals
underwent cumulative volatilization losses of 50% or more  in 1 year in the sandy
soil  (including  the  four compounds  listed above that exhibited >50%  volatilization
without  water  evaporation  and  TCE, ethylene dibromide,  and dichloromethane).
Again, only dichlorodifluoromethane  volatilized 50% or  more in the clay  soil.
Although there  were no field  data to validate  these model results,  the  data imply
that  appreciable quantities of the most  volatile  compounds will  escape readily from
buried sources.  Volatilization from the  soil  surface can be  an important
mechanism  for the removal of the above-mentioned VOCs  from the vadose zone.

FIELD STUDIES OF VOC FATE  AND MOVEMENT

       Field studies  attempt to  define rates of  dissipation and  movement  of VOCs
in soil. These  studies generally measure the distribution pattern of VOCs and
relate  the results to  prominent factors postulated to affect the dissipation and
movement of soil VOCs  The  studies reviewed here have been termed either  "field
experiments" in which the researchers were able to control or had some a priori
knowledge of the contamination event, or "field  investigations" in which  case the
researchers were studying  contamination without  a priori knowledge of the
characteristics of the contamination  event.  In general, the  studies  have assumed
that  VOCs move by  vapor  diffusion, tempered by the  ability of the soil to transmit
gas.

Field Experiments

      Weeks et al. (1982) measured  gaseous concentrations of two fluorocarbons
(released to the  atmosphere  during the 40 years prior to  this study) as deep as 44 m
in unconsolidated  sedimentary  deposits  in the  Southern  High Plains of Texas. They
estimated lumped  gaseous-diffusion coefficients  for  the  combined effects  of
                                        34

-------
tortuosity,  sorption, and  solubility. Assuming that gaseous  diffusion was the
primary  mechanism for transport  of these  highly refractory compounds,  the
lumped effective diffusion coefficients of 0.04 mVday and 0.09 mVday  for
fluorocarbons F-ll and F-12, respectively, occurred in the sediments as opposed to
theoretical values of 0.78 mVday and 0.86 mVday in free air. Convective transport
resulting from movement of air to fill the voids  caused by a declining water table
(estimated to have  declined at 0.3 to 0.6 m/year  since the early 1950s) was considered,
but the contribution of  convective transport was  deemed small  enough to be
ignored.

       In  a similar study, Kreamer et al.  (1988)  used a fluorocarbon tracer,
bromochlorodifluoromethane, to  observe  gaseous  diffusion in a  shallow (35  m)
deposit of aeolian  sand  near Barnwell, South Carolina. The objective  was to
quantify  the  in situ gaseous  tortuosity  at the existing moisture content (a lumped
gaseous-diffusion coefficient as  in Weeks et al.,  1982). Kreamer et al. (1988)
performed independent  measurements  of the free-air diffusion  coefficient of  the
tracer, air-water, and  soil-water tracer distribution coefficients  and  of  the  soil
porosity  and  moisture content  in  appropriate subsamples. A  network  of
piezometers  distributed  radially  and vertically from  the buried  tracer  source was
sampled  and  analyzed continuously for 3 days  before  the fluorocarbon source  was
introduced and  for 7  days following the placement  of the  source.  Kreamer  et  al.
(1988) computed a "sorption-affected"  porosity value with which to  compare  the
field  data because the field-measured  concentrations are  modified by  soil-water  and
air-water  partitioning. Variability  in  the  data (attributed to analytical error)  and
uncertainties  in the porosity and volumetric moisture content of the sand (only  one
undisturbed core was obtained) greatly weakened the  study.  The tortuosity  of the
geologic  unit was determined to be about 0.4 (dimensionless)  and the  sorption-
affected porosity was  reported to be 0.22 (also dimensionless).

       A study by  Poulsen and Kueper (1992) iooked at the advective  movement of
a NAPL. The authors released tetrachloroethene  to cleared areas 5 cm  below the
soil  surface.  A nonvolatile  hydrophobic dye  was mixed with the tetrachloroethene.
Two 6-L releases were followed, one consisting of a slow drip  (100 rein) over
approximately 1-cm2 surface  area, the other  consisting of a rapid (90 s) ponded
episode over  approximately  1,000-cm2 surface area.  Excavation of each area  began a
day  after the release.  The distribution pattern of  the dye was observed and  a  2-mL
piston subsampler  was used to  collect soil for tetrachloroethene analysis. The
movement observed in  the  stratified sandy  subsurface  indicated  that  capillary
forces dominated.  Tetrachloroethene was distributed  in  distinct  stringers  occupying
sand  laminations separated  by a few to several  centimeters and characterized by
                                         35

-------
subtle variations  in texture, color, and grain size.  The bedding in the upper 1.86 m
dipped to the northeast and the slow-drip release closely followed the  bedding.  The
ponded release  produced  a greater  concentration of tetrachloroethene in the upper
portion overriding the  bedding in the upper 0.5m.  The  depths  of migration  were
approximately 3.2 m for the slow release and 2.0 m for  the rapid release. Average
residual concentrations  were 0.49% and 1.26% for the slow and rapid releases,
respectively.

Field  Investigations

       The diffusion  of TCE from contaminated ground  water at a  depth of
approximately 42 m was measured by  analysis of data on shallow (<2 m deep) soil
gas (Marrin and  Thompson, 1987).  At a nearby unspecified distance, unlined  solvent
evaporation ponds had  been used to  dispose of halocarbon solvents from 1951 to
1977. In 1984, the gaseous TCE plume spanned 3 orders of magnitude (<0.001 to 2
^g/L)  on a 0.5-km2area of adjacent  property. Soil gas TCE values  within  a  10-m
radius of each of five  ground-water monitoring  wells were shown to correlate with
ground-water  TCE  concentrations. A limited number of  vertical soil gas  profiles
showed that  TCE concentrations  generally increased with depth. Caliche zones  did
not affect TCE  gas  concentration gradients, but a sharp  decrease in the
concentration  gradient  occurred  across  clay lenses.  Nearly saturated strata showed
anomalously  low TCE concentrations. Overall,  the  TCE diffused  approximately 40
m in this arid environment in much less  than 30 years,  assuming  that transport to
ground water from the pond  and subsequent lateral transport by  ground-water flow
would have required more time than the vertical gaseous diffusion.

       Kuhlmeier and Sunderland (1985) reported on the distribution of petroleum
hydrocarbons  from  leaking buried storage  tanks  at  a site near Livermore,
California.  The leaks occurred over  a period of 6 months  and permeated
approximately 24.4 m  of  unsaturated lacustrine  and fluvial  sediments before
reaching ground water.  Soil  borings  were sampled from a split-spoon sampler at  1.5-
m intervals; stainless steel liners were covered with aluminum foil, sealed with duct
tape,  and placed  on  dry ice after sampling and during  transport to a laboratory  for
subsequent analysis by  SW-846 Method 8020  (volatile aromatics). Model predictions
of the movement of  benzene,  toluene,  and xylene (BTX) were compared  with the
laboratory data. Field data showed a marked increase of  BTX in clay zones as
compared to sandy units (e.g., 3,000  to  4,800 mg/kg BTX  were found in a clay  layer,
overlying 1,138 mg/kg in the sandy unit). This attenuation by clay indicates an
increased  adsorption  coefficient in the finer  textured deposits. It was also reported
                                        36

-------
that organic  carbon had  no effect on sorption  (total  organic  carbon varied  between
0 [sic.] and 3%). Unexpectedly, little  or no lateral dispersion of BTX was  observed.
This is particularly surprising in light of theory  and numerous observations that
horizontal  flow occurs along the interface between  coarse  and fine  lenses.
Kuhlmeier and Sunderland (1985) suggested that the volume of gasoline released
was large  enough  to  create advective NAPL flow gradients.

       Johnson and Perrott (1991) studied the vapor transport of gasoline in  a soil
that had a high  water content.  Soil  vapor concentrations  of butane, pentane,
hexane, benzene, toluene, oxygen, methane,  and carbon dioxide were measured
periodically for a year at fixed sampling  ports near some underground storage
tanks  in  Portland,  Oregon. Data  indicated  relatively constant  gasoline-component
concentrations  at sampling points  near  the center  of the  vapor plume. Lower
gasoline concentrations that increased during the  year were  detected a few meters
away.  The different  components of  gasoline vary  in their  physiochemical
properties  such that  calculated retardation coefficients  vary widely however,
isoconcentration contours  showed  that the pattern  and extent of contamination
were  very similar  for all  components.  Environmental factors  of  barometric-
pressure fluctuations  and  water-level  fluctuations  did not  show significant  effects
on  vapor  concentrations.   Vapor concentrations  did  appear to  be  directly  affected
by  soil temperature.  The  soil temperature dropped  approximately  10 °C  during the
winter and plots  of winter vapor concentrations with  time showed a decrease;  the
curve  shape  was similar  to that of the temperature curve. In  contrast  to  vapor
movement around tanks that are placed in engineered backfills  (e.g., pea  gravel),
vapor  movement in high-water content  soils is  very slow. Model predictions
estimated that  less  than 1% of the source concentration of a nonsorbing  compound
(unit retardation factor) would travel  7 m  after 8 years.  Methane,  resulting from
anaerobic  degradation,  was  a  good indicator of the contaminated zone. However,
the slow diffusion  in  this soil and general persistence of gasoline  components led
the authors to  conclude that once the vapors entered the  soil, future leak detection
using vapor sampling  may not be possible.

       Smith et al.  (1990) presented data on  soil gas TCE  concentrations, TCE-water
vapor  sorption  isotherms,  and  concentrations of TCE sorbed by soil  at  a site above
a contaminated aquifer at Picatinny  Arsenal in New  Jersey.  TCE-containing
wastewater had been  discharged into  lagoons and into a nearby unlined, overflow
dry well from 1960 to  1981. Soil gas  data closely paralleled changes  in the
concentration of TCE  in  the  shallow ground water. Temporal effects  in  vertical
gas concentration  profiles  were influenced by  the  ground-water temperature.
                                        37

-------
Increased ground-water  temperatures in July and October (as opposed to  the
temperatures in  December and  February) generally  resulted in increased
concentrations  of TCE in the  soil gas.

SUMMARY OF  VOC  MOVEMENT

       Movement  of VOCs in soil results from  diffusion  and advection. Diffusion is
driven by concentration  gradients.  Advection can be driven by pressure,  density,
gravity,  or  thermal gradients. Gaseous molecular  diffusion coefficients exceed
those of liquid coefficients by 4  to 5  orders of magnitude and therefore, gaseous
diffusion  will dominate  over liquid diffusion (Sleep  and Sykes, 1989). Density-
driven NAPL advection  is estimated  to  dominate VOC movement in highly
permeable soils when the NAPL  source is present in excess of the soil residual
saturation level and the  NAPL relative vapor  density is greater than that of air
(Falta  et  al., 1989). When present, large-scale  heterogeneities-such as bedding,
textural  discontinuities,  structural changes, anthropogenic  materials  and  other
debris, channels, cracks,  and  fissures-can  create  distinct flow paths for liquid and
gaseous movement (Falta et al, 1989; Kreamer et al.,  1988; Poulsen and Kueper, 1992).

       Gaseous diffusion measured  in situ was  assumed to have prompted the
movement of two fluorocarbons in deep deposits in  Texas (Weeks  et  al., 1982).  The
fluorocarbons were found to have moved  44 m in  approximately 40 years.
Movement of TCE upward through a  deep deposit  in Arizona, presumed to be
diffusing  from  contaminated ground water at  approximately 42 m, was observed at
a depth of 2 m (Marrin  and Thompson,  1987).  The diffusion time was shorter than
that in Texas,  less than  30 years, in  response  to a  greater concentration gradient.  In
Oregon, which  has a more humid environment, and  in a soil said to be of high
moisture content,  gaseous diffusion of gasoline components was estimated at
approximately 7 m lateral in  8 years  (Johnson  and Perrott, 1991).  The appearance  of
carbon tetrachloride in ground water at 177 m  suggests a mechanism other  than
diffusion moving the VOC at  a site in Idaho (Falta et al., 1989).

      Calculations based on physiochemical properties of soils and NAPLs  and  on
environmental parameters  have demonstrated the possible  importance of gas
advection in VOC  movement.  First,  large  barometric  pressure fluctuations  can
cause air  to  migrate several meters in a highly permeable soil. This  movement may
be reflected in soil gas  measurements  read  before and after large  storms pass
(Massmann and Farrier,  1992). Second, gas  advection can be driven by density
gradients  By examining  the  saturated vapor  pressure  and  sorption  coefficients
(Koc) of many VOCs as well  as their soil permeability characteristics, Falta et al.
                                        38

-------
(1989) showed that density-driven gaseous advection could dominate flow of many
organic solvents, including TCE, chloroform,  1,1,1-trichloroethane,  methylene
chloride, 1,2-dichloroethene,  1,2-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethane,  carbon
tetrachloride, Freon 113, and  possibly benzene.  Contaminants  that  are not likely to
be affected by  density-driven flow include toluene, ethylbenzene,  xylene,
chlorobenzene, naphthalene, and phenols (Falta et al., 1989).

       Field studies have shown that  NAPL advection is  sensitive  to  small
variations in soil permeability and capillary  characteristics (Poulsen  and Kueper,
1992). The migration pattern  of tetrachloroethene followed  subtle  changes  in
bedding  of a stratified  sand  deposit.  Characteristics of source release also  affected
the NAPL  migration. Tetrachloroethene was  observed to migrate  deeper and
retain  a  smaller residual fraction when applied slowly over a small soil  area  as
opposed  to a rapid application over  a large  soil area.  Kuhlmeier  and Sunderland
(1985) observed deep vertical movement (24.4 m) of BTX with almost no lateral
spread, even though textural  discontinuities were  present in  the lacustrine  and
fluvial deposits.  They  postulated that rapid  leaks  of underground  storage  tanks
caused the  strongly vertical movement by  NAPL  advection.
                                         39

-------
                                   SECTION 5

                 MODELING  THE MOVEMENT OF  SOIL  VOCS
       Modeling VOC vapor  transport  in  unsaturated soil  is a  recent phenomenon
for environmental scientists (primarily  put forth by  civil engineers, soil physicists,
and hydrologists).  Early research on  soil gases, such as radon,  oxygen, carbon
dioxide,  and pesticides, although basic  to  the recent surge  of interest, did  not
involve extensive  modeling and did not address factors peculiar to VOCs  such as
the nonaqueous-phase liquids characteristic  of  petroleum spills or vapor-density
gradients  arising from  dense organic  solvents. Multiphase,  multicomponent  flow
models exist in petroleum engineering, however,  and this  knowledge has  been
recognized  and used to formulate environmental  applications  (Finder and Abriola,
1986). Much of the current environmental interest follows the  advent of "soil
venting" or "vapor extraction" as  a means of remediating vadose zone
contamination.

       Table 3  compares some characteristics of 14 models that are entirely  or partly
designed to simulate  VOC movement in soil or porous media.  The models  selected
are representative  of the major features  and processes  that researchers incorporate
in soil-VOC models.  The list includes  some relatively simple screening/
management models (Jury et al.,  1983; Silka,  1988; Falta, et al., 1989; Shoemaker et al.,
1990), laboratory soil-column  descriptions of vapor movement (Gierke et al., 1990;
Gierke et al., 1992; Brusseau,  1991), one field-scale description accompanied by field
data (Metcalfe  and Farquhar,  1987),  and many  field-scale models  that define theory
and evaluate model approaches  to VOC  movement in porous media (Abriola and
Finder, 1985; Corapcioglu and Baehr, 1987; Sleep and Sykes, 1989; Mendoza and
McAlary, 1990; Katyal et al., 1991; Massmann and Farrier, 1992). All of the models
embrace  vapor diffusion and  most of  the models incorporate aqueous-vapor
partitioning.

       The  purpose of this discussion is to draw  attention  to the  intent and  extent
of these  models, to indicate  directions  under development,  and  to  outline  some of
the knowledge  gained from this form of analysis.  The models  are discussed in
three  subsections  screening/management  models,  laboratory soil  column
simulations, and field-scale  simulations.
                                       40

-------
TABLE 3. COMPARATIVE FEATURES OF SOME VAPOR-TRANSPORT MODELS
Model Features
Dimensions
Aqueous-vapor distribution
Solid-aqueous distribution
Vapor-solid distribution
Degradation
Vapor diffusion
Vapor advection (P=pressure,
D=density)
Water flow (S=stcady state,
T=transient)
Immiscible phase
(S=sink/source term, F=flow)
Sorption nonequilibrium
Physical nonequilibrium
Multicomponent equation set
Application
(S=screening/management,
L=laboratory soil column,
F=field reseach)
Juryetal., Abriola& Corapcioglu& Metcalfe& Silka, 1988 Faltaetal,
1983 Pinder, Baehr, 1987 Farquhar, 1989
1985 1987
11 1 222
XXX XX
X X XX

X X
X XX X
P D
S T S
S,F S,F S



S F F F S S
Sleep &
Skyes, 1989
2
X



X
P,D
T
S

X

F
                                                                                  (continued)

-------
      TABLE 3. (continued)
to
Model Features Gierke et Mendoza & Shoemaker Brusseau,
al, 1990 McAlary, etal, 1990 1991
1990
Dimensions 1 2 1,2 1
Aqueous-vapor distribution x x x x
Solid-aqueous distribution x x x x
Vapor-solid distribution x
Degradation x
Vapor diffusion x x x x
Vapor advection (P=pressure, P D P
D=density)
Water flow (S=steady state, S S
T=transient)
Immiscible phase
(S=sink/source term, F=flow)
Sorption nonequilibrium x
Physical nonequilibrium x x
Multicomponent equation set
Application L F S L
(S=screening/management,
L=laboratory soil column,
F=field research)
Katyal et
al, 1991
2
x
x

X
X
P,D
T
S,F

x
x
F
Gierke et Massmann
al, 1992 & Farrier,
1992
1 12
x
x
X

X X
P P



X
X
L F
           Model can accomodate vapor sorptton u certain parameters are redefined.

-------
SCREENING/MANAGEMENT  MODELS

       Jury et al. (1983) described a model designed for comparing  the soil behavior
of new and  existing organic chemicals.  Although the model was presented  almost
10 years  ago, the simplified approach with direct analytical solutions to  equations
has bestowed the  status of a "back-of-the-notebook" calculation for some of the
equations.  The  model  assumes  linear equilibrium distributions  between  vapor,
liquid, and  adsorbed chemical, net first-order  degradation  rates,  steady-state  upward
or downward water flow, volatilization from  the  soil surface  through a  stagnant air
boundary layer, and homogeneous soil properties, all  defined  by user input
variables. Experimental evidence  demonstrated that  the model  correctly predicted
the relative volatilization loss of five pesticides that were  exposed to identical
conditions in the laboratory (Jury  et al.,  1984). The simulation of surface
volatilization of buried  sources of  VOCs  was reported  by Jury  et  al. (1990) and
discussed earlier in  this report.

       Silka (1988) developed a simple, two-dimensional vapor transport model as a
tool  for  interpreting  soil-gas surveys.  The model extends  the  total concentration
equations of Jury  et al. (1983) to two dimensions, but omits the equations for water
movement and neglects biodegradation. As with many  models, field
experimentation lags  behind model development and no test of this model  was
presented. Model  runs  demonstrated the  importance of  soil water  to the design and
results of soil-gas  surveys.

       Falta et al.  (1989) explored the  simulated effect of gas-density gradients in
unsaturated  porous media.  Using  thermodynamic  properties of the compounds  and
estimates  of retardation by  sorption, they screened 14 common ground-water
contaminants for the relative impact of density-driven flow as a function of media
permeability. Results showed the  contaminants that were  most likely to be
influenced by density-driven flow (reviewed previously  in  this report) and  that
density-driven flow will be  significant only if the permeability of the medium is at
least  10 um2.

       Shoemaker  et al. (1990) presented a screening model that encompasses vapor
sorption whenever soil  moisture  is dry enough for this  process to  occur. They
developed one- and  two-dimensional solutions  to the  analytical model of Jury  et al.
(1983). An "effective" or "two-phase" sorption  coefficient is defined as the sum of
the solid-aqueous  sorption  coefficient and the vapor-solid  coefficient. The  vapor-
solid  sorption is dependent  on the soil water content, but  the data currently  are
limited to a few laboratory  studies for a  few soils and  soil-like materials. The
                                        43

-------
 authors  concluded that  effects  of vapor-phase sorption  are  greatest in  soils of high
 surface  area that has an  accompanying low  water content. For  soils that  have high
 water contents  or  low specific surface area,  liquid-phase  sorption models would  be
 adequate (quantification of these  concepts  was  not provided). Shoemaker  et  al.
 (1990) suggest  that sorption be measured under field conditions  to determine  the
 influence of vapor-phase  sorption in situ.

 LABORATORY SOIL COLUMN SIMULATIONS

       In the screening  models, all interphase transfer processes are facilitated by
 assuming  equilibrium with respect  to  interphase  partitioning.  Although these
 assumptions simplify  the  transport analysis, they are rarely valid,  and the
 consequences of these assumptions are likely to be magnified in descriptions  of
 long-term  or large-scale  (field)  transport  phenomena.  Asymmetrical  breakthrough
 curves  representing laboratory  soil column results  provide  evidence that the
 supposition of equilibrium sorption is  not generally valid  (Brusseau and Rao, 1989).
 Any  of the  interphase transfers that VOCs undergo (e.g., air-water, NAPL-water,
 water-solid)  may be rate-limited  or exist out of equilibrium in soil. Laboratory soil
 columns can be employed to estimate the  effectiveness of  techniques  for  describing
 transport of VOCs  in porous media.

       Harmon et al. (1989) reviewed  the modeling approaches for dealing  with
 nonequilibrium  transport phenomena.  They provided a concise  summary  of
 chemical and  physical  nonequilibrium  model  approaches.  Chemical nonequilibrium
 models are generally  two-site models.  Sorption is  described as rapidly reversible for
 some fraction of sorption  sites  (the local equilibrium  assumption)  and characterized
 by slow resorption kinetics for the  remaining fraction  of sorption  sites. The
 fraction  of sites in each category and kinetic rate  constants for  forward and reverse
 sorption are required input  parameters.  Physical  nonequilibrium models are
 generally based on  a  two-zone description of soil water (mobile/immobile)  with a
 mass  transfer coefficient between the  two  zones.  Diffusion-based  physical models
 assume that  rapid  chemical sorption occurs in  the  mobile water and that  kinetically
 limited sorption  occurs  in immobile regions.  The transfer of water or contaminant
 between these regions is modeled either  by Pick's second  law of diffusion (a second-
 order differential equation taking  the  geometry  of the  immobile region into
 account) or,  more  simply,  by assuming  a  first-order rate  transfer equation.

      Gierke et al.  (1990) developed  a model to study the relative contributions of
gas and  water advection, gas and water dispersion, mass  transfer resistance,
diffusion in immobile water, sorption, and volatilization on the  spreading  and
                                        44

-------
retardation of VOC breakthrough in soil columns.  They found the rates of mass
transfer across the air-water and the mobile-immobile water  interfaces  to  be fast
(mass  transfer rates across  the  air-water interface  and mobile-immobile interface
were 4.8  and 660 times the transport rate by advection in mobile water,
respectively) Both liquid  dispersion and diffusion  in  immobile  water were
important for describing TCE transport. Vapor dispersion was  lower than
predicted  by a factor  of 10, and vapor  diffusion was  not an  important  transport
mechanism  for  TCE when  the  average  pore water velocities were greater  than
about 0.07 cm s'in  sand, or greater than about  0.02 cm s'in aggregated  porous  "soil
material"  (a  fired clay used as  an industrial  insulator). Henry's Law  constant for
TCE was almost twice as large as values in the literature and the  authors  surmise
that sorption  onto packing  and column materials produced this artifact.

       Gierke et  al.  (1992)  redesigned their  experimental  conditions to distinguish
between the impacts  of different physical  nonequilibrium mechanisms  on  organic
vapor  transport. Gas flow rates were varied  to  simulate  soil  venting, and both
granular and aggregated soils  were  fabricated (as in previous work) under  moist
and dry conditions  with toluene as the test  compound. The  authors  reevaluated
some of their conclusions  from  Gierke et al.  (1990) and concluded that  fingered  or
preferential  flow could  explain  the  large liquid dispersion coefficients  observed in
that study.  Under dry conditions,  toluene vapor transport in the  granular  and
aggregated "soil material" was affected only by  gas advection, gas diffusion in the
mobile  gas  region, and vapor  sorption.  Gas-water mass-transfer  was  never
important.  Nonequilibrium  effects were  observed in columns that  consisted of
moist,  uniformly  sized  fired-clay aggregate  the  effects  were attributed  to
intraaggregate diffusion in  immobile water.  The  toluene breakthrough  for  moist
aggregated material  took eight times longer than for moist sand, an  effect
explained by  the  higher  moisture content of the aggregated material and  the
impact  of intraaggregate  diffusion.

       Brusseau  (1991) developed a model that accounts for both physical and
chemical nonequilibrium processes  under forced gas advection and an  immobile
liquid  phase.  The model used mass transfer  coefficients  for water-solid, air-water,
and mobile-immobile  water. Brusseau tested  the model  using data  from the
literature,  including the  data of Gierke  et al. (1992). Values for all parameters,
independent of curve  fitting, were  obtained  by  a variety  of estimation  techniques.
Model predictions for each  data set were  shown to  fit soil column breakthrough
curves  better than when the local  equilibrium concept was employed.
                                        45

-------
FIELD-SCALE  SIMULATIONS

       The models discussed so far have simplified water flow, which, if
incorporated,  is modeled as steady-state flow.  In moist or fine-textured  media, VOC
dissolution and transport in water are probably  significant and must be included if
the model is intended to estimate actual  field concentrations. Simplified
representations,  such as those  discussed above, have  limited,  specific conditions of
application and thus reduce the model complexity.  Field-scale research  models may
also possess  limited application, e.g., Metcalfe and Farquhar (1987)  and Massmann
and Farrier (1992) both depict vapor transport over  short periods  of time. The more
comprehensive field  models that  attempt to portray  long-term transport in a
heterogeneous  porous medium  have exceeded  our ability to  obtain experimental
data.  Both input  and output  data  are  extensive  in these models. The complex
models are not designed to be  used as general field  tools, but to further our
understanding of  processes and computing  capabilities.  Such  models are often
verified numerically  that is, the validity of the numeric computer  code  solution is
tested against a simplified version of the model  that can be  solved analytically.
Lack of data, however,  precludes determining the validity of the  model  as a tool
for describing  VOC  transport in soil.

       Abriola and Finder (1985)  began developing a model to depict the multiphase
(solute, gas,  and NAPL) migration  of a petroleum spill in porous media. They
presented equations governed by  mass conservation  principles and volume
averaging theory  to describe  a contaminant composed  of two distinct components,
one of which may be volatile  and slightly water soluble and  the other which is both
nonvolatile and insoluble in water. Finder and Abriola  (1986) suggested that three
assumptions  incorporated into  their model are undergoing  scrutiny (1) the use of
Darcy's Law  to represent the convective flux of a fluid phase (neglects  hysteresis
effects and the observation of preferential migration pathways), (2) the supposition
of immobile  air (no  vapor advection),  and (3)  the use  of equilibrium partitioning.

       Corapcioglu and Baehr (1987) devised a model for describing surface
petroleum spills that could be extended to include any  number of reactive
constituents  (such as BTX). The model utilizes mass conservation  of oxygen as the
limiting factor (upper boundary)  in the microbial degradation of petroleum
hydrocarbons. The general model can  be  divided into two subproblems  to describe
an  oil spill: (1) oil plume establishment in the unsaturated zone, and (2) solute and
vapor  transport subsequent to immiscible  plume  establishment.
                                        46

-------
       To describe  the  pressure variation created during gas venting by a vacuum
withdrawal  system, gaseous  advection must be modeled in  addition to  gaseous
diffusion. Metcalfe and Farquhar (1987) use the equations for hydrodynamic
dispersion in porous media, as outlined in Bear (1979), to depict gaseous
advection/dispersion. Metcalfe  and Farquhar (1987), rather  than use mass
conservation equations, based their  equations on molar quantities  as a way  to
handle the obvious density differences between air and  VOCs (in this instance,
methane). They produced a conservative, two-dimensional  model  for vapor
movement  in the  unsaturated zone. The model was  tested by  simulating methane
migration from  a  landfill in Ontario  over  summer and winter boundary conditions
(assuming impermeable  frozen  soil  during  the winter). Using measured  gas
concentrations as initial conditions,  subsequent data (generally 1  month later) were
simulated by the model. The actual field data were  spatially  far more variable
than the model  predictions,  but model results  were generally  within 50% of
observed values.

       Sleep  and Sykes (1989) borrowed the concept  of mass  transfer approximation
from  chemical  engineering  to  represent nonequilibrium interphase  transfers  in  a
field-scale  model.   Empirically  determined  mass-transfer coefficients are employed
to express  the driving  force between equilibrium and  actual concentrations.  Mass
transfer coefficients for air-water, NAPL-air,  and NAPL-water are  incorporated in
their model, although  sorption  is neglected. Model  results  simulating  the
movement  of a buried TCE source provided  qualitative evidence for the
importance  of the  mass transfer coefficients. The model could not be verified
because comparable field data do not exist.

       Mendoza and Me Alary (1990) and Mendoza and Frind (1990) employed a
radial  coordinate system, density-driven flow,   and  equilibrium sorption estimates in
a model designed  to simulate VOC gas transport over a few  weeks. They
investigated the effect  of surface boundary conditions and  found that  an
impermeable cover over  the ground surface will increase  the  lateral migration  of
the vapor plume.  A permeable ground  surface that allows  natural  venting of gases
will  reduce  the  lateral  extent of  the vapor plume.  Diffusion  is the  dominant vapor
transport mechanism for  TCE in  a  deposit with  a permeability of medium sand.
Density-driven vapor advection  becomes important in coarse sands  or  gravels for
compounds  with high  vapor pressures and  high molecular weights.

      An EPA-sponsored model to  simulate the two-dimensional  flow and
transport of three fluid phases (water, NAPL,  and gas) has been  generated by
Katyal et al. (1991). The model allows the user to analyze flow only or coupled flow
                                        47

-------
and contaminant transport. It  can be used  to  analyze  the  two-phase flow  of water
and NAPL, or three-phase flow of water, NAPL, and  gas  at variable pressure.
Transport of as many as five  components  can be described, assuming either  local
equilibrium mass transfer  or  first-order, kinetically  controlled mass transfer.
Required inputs  are extensive,  encompassing  the  air-water capillary retention
function,  NAPL  surface  tension  and interracial tension with water,  NAPL viscosity,
maximum residual  NAPL  saturation,  soil  hydraulic conductivity,  component
densities, mass  transfer coefficients,  and boundary  condition  data.  Methods  for
estimation of certain parameters are  included. Resulting  outputs  are  equally
extensive,  including  saturations, velocities,  and concentrations for  each  phase at
every  node at specified intervals. The  computing is rendered more  efficient by
incorporating  time-lagged interphase  mass-transfer rates  and phase  densities.

       Massmann and Farrier (1992) have argued  (as have  others, including Brusseau
[1991] and Thorstenson and Pollock [1989]) that the  validity of the classical  single-
component  advection-diffusion  equation to  describe  vapor transport should be
bracketed by  the material permeability and the total  pressure  gradient. They
evaluated the limits of the single-component  advection-diffusion  equation through
a  set of  fully coupled multicomponent equations.  They  concluded  that the
advection-diffusion  equation is adequate if media permeabilities  are  greater than
about  1010cm2.  The equation  significantly  overestimates  gas  fluxes for  low-
permeability materials, becoming egregious for permeabilities of 1012to 1013cm2.
Large  atmospheric  barometric  pressure fluctuations can  occur that  create
significant subsurface gas pressure  gradients and  thus  affect vapor movement.
These  conditions may cause horizontal pressure  gradients  in heterogeneous  soil,
depending on site  geometry,  material  properties  and the amplitude and period of
the barometric fluctuations. Massmann  and  Farrier (1992)  did not address  the
effects of gas density and soil water in their analysis.

SUMMARY OF MODELS

       Mathematical modeling  of soil-VOC  movement  has  many objectives and
various strategies for meeting  those  objectives. Models have been developed to
screen for differences among  compounds or to serve as management tools,  such as
to guide the interpretation  of  soil gas  surveys. Research on  heterogeneous flow
domains,  or transport-related nonequilibrium, is partly  pursued by use of laboratory
soil  columns and models to describe observations.  Field-scale  simulations to
describe  flow  and transport of contaminants created by spills  of immiscible solvents
or petroleum,  can expand our understanding of theory and our  computing  skills.
Research  models are  incorporating  much more than the traditional  homogeneous
                                        48

-------
soil, equilibrium  sorption, single contaminant, and isobaric  conditions  that
characterized  earlier model efforts. Modeling  research,  however,  runs  far  ahead  of
the field  data needed to calibrate and validate  existing  models. Accurate
quantitation of  soil VOCs is  crucial to model validation.
                                         49

-------
                                    SECTION 6

              OBTAINING AND  MAINTAINING  VOC  SAMPLES
       Quantification  and control of potential  errors arising  during  sample
collection,  handling, preparation, storage,  and analysis are recognized as critical for
meeting  data quality objectives  of environmental samples  (van Ee et  al., 1990).
Specified procedures for obtaining  soil VOC for analysis  by SW-846 Methods
8240/8260  are  minimal. For soil VOCs the need to standardize  sampling  procedures
has been recognized, but the methods for studying  soil  volatiles under controlled
conditions  to verify sampling  improvements have been  troublesome.  Issues of  bulk
sample acquisition including recommendations  for soil sampling  devices and
subsampling techniques have been raised and reviewed by Lewis et al.  (1991)
Volatile  losses  have been seen to  contribute negative bias  throughout each period
that the  soil  is exposed to  air.  Sampling  and subsampling methods  are  driven by
the need to minimize exposed soil surface area, time of exposure, and soil
disaggregation to reduce negative sample bias (Lewis et  al.,  1991). Although the
natural or  man-made variability that typify soils affects  soil sampling for other
analytes  as well,  homogenization and  observation techniques  to  manage variability
(e.g.,  mixing, compositing, and  visual inspection of soil samples) are  drastically
reduced  in VOC  sampling.  Abbreviated  sampling  procedures exacerbate  the
problem  of securing representative samples for VOC  analysis and certainly
contribute  to the  large variability  reported for  field soil-VOC concentrations
(Hewitt et al., 1992, Mitchell, et al., 1993).

       This section first describes the general procedures  used for VOC sampling.
Studies related  to sampling methods are then discussed,  separated into laboratory
and field investigations. Studies emphasizing the storage and preservation  of soil-
VOC  samples are presented in  a separate  subsection.  Finally, a  summary of
sampling and preservation results is  provided.

CURRENT SAMPLING METHODS

       Soil  samples for  VOC analysis are  obtained by  coring, augering, or scooping
devices.  Coring  is  generally preferred because  it disturbs the  sample least.  Lewis et
al. (1991) provide a detailed discussion of sampling  devices for obtaining soils for
analysis of VOCs.
                                        50

-------
       The suggested container  for the initial soil  sample is  a 125-mL wide-mouth
jar (SW-846 Method 8240), but the choice of sample containers is often determined
by site characteristics and  the intended purpose of the sampling  effort (Lewis et al.,
1991). Either 40-mL volatile organics analysis (VOA)  vials are used,  or wide-mouth
bottles (125-, 250-, or 500-mL)  with Teflon-lined, foam-backed lids are used. Soil
typically fills the container,  leaving  as  little headspace  as  practicable. Another
option is to collect 1- to 5-g  soil samples in the field and place these  into  40-mL
VOA vials. These can be capped in the field with a lid that  can be  connected
directly to a purge-and-trap sparger (Lewis et al.,  1991). Alternatively, brass core
liners are capped and sealed in  the field.

       When transferring  soil from a  coring  device to  a wide-mouth  bottle or vial,
the sampler's objectives are  minimum disturbance to  the sample and shortest
possible  transfer time.  Depending  on the diameter of the soil core and the
diameter of the jar,  soil can be extruded directly  into the jar  if the sample is fairly
cohesive,  or subsampled with a subcorer. Plunger/barrel-style  subcoring devices  (10-
mL plastic  syringes  with the needle  end cut off)  are suggested for collecting and
extruding approximately 5  g of soil into a 40-mL VOA vial (Lewis et  al.,  1991)
Procedures that include soil compositing and mixing,  either in the  field or with
cold (4 °C) procedures in the laboratory, have not been  specifically excluded,
although mixing procedures are known to create  large losses  of analyte.

       The final  subsampling and  transfer  steps are performed by personnel  at an
analytical laboratory (excluding the  1- to 5-g samples  placed in VOA vials in the
field).  The  standard procedure  is to empty samples into an aluminum pan, briefly
"homogenize," and remove an aliquot into  a  sparging vessel for PT analysis. SW-846
Method 8240 requires  a 1-g  (wet weight) aliquot  for  analyte  concentrations  expected
in the  0.1 to 1.0 mg/kg range and a 5-g (wet weight) aliquot if concentrations less
than 0.1  mg/kg are  expected. Recognizing the losses associated with  the
subsampling  step, SW-846  Method 5035 ("Determination of Volatile Organic
Compounds in Soils Using Equilibrium  Headspace  Analysis and Capillary Column
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry;"  to be included in the  Third Update  to
SW-846) dictates the use of a soil sampler which delivers 5 g of soil to a 40-mL
VOA vial.  The balance between sample representativeness  (which would  prescribe
ample  homogenization) and preservation of  volatile  analytes  is increasingly
disposed to sample  preservation.

      Described above are  EPA procedures.  The American Society  for  Testing
and Materials (ASTM) has  independently  voted acceptance  of procedures for
sampling solid wastes; D 4547-91, "Standard Practice for Sampling Waste and Soils
                                        51

-------
for Volatile Organics" (ASTM, 1991). The ASTM D 4547-91 procedures encompass
two methods of  sampling  loose  granular materials and  three methods to  handle the
sample  once it is collected. These procedures include (1) collecting  a sample in a
metal ring and shipping the entire soil/ring  sample to a laboratory,  (2) subsampling
with a metal coring cylinder and placing the subsample  in methanol, and (3)
subsampling as in (2) but placing the sample into a VOA vial that is capped with a
lid modified for  direct connection to a PT sparger.

LABORATORY  SAMPLING STUDIES

      Opening of a vial or jar to take  a subsample has  been shown  by many
researchers to cause large losses  of VOCs. Amin and Narang (1985) showed that
chilled [sic.] clay that was spiked and mixed  for 15 to 30 s on an ice-cold surface had
losses ranging from 7% for carbon tetrachloride to 36% for  1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane.
Unchilled soil that was transferred from  one sample tube to another showed losses
ranging from 14% to 53% (Amin and Narang, 1985). Maskarinec et al. (1988)
estimated an average 60% volatilization loss of VOCs during sample transfer steps;
this estimate was determined  by comparing  a pour, mix, and subsample procedure
with sample placed  directly into  vials that have lids  which can be attached  to a PT
sparger. Zarrabi et al. (1991) showed analyte  losses of 20% to 80% from the
subsampling step, again using the modified-lid vials.

      Siegrist and  Jenssen (1990) have evaluated the effects of sample  disturbance,
container  headspace,  and  sample transfer steps  on VOC measurements. Six  VOCs
in aqueous solution  were added to soil  by saturated upward  flow  (15 pore volumes)
through a column of soil.  The column was  "desaturated under suction for  less than
an  hour. Subsequently, the column was sealed and stored overnight  at 10 °C prior
to sampling.  The  sampling  procedure  consisted of concurrently inserting  10
stainless-steel sampling tubes,  each 10 cm long  with an  aluminum-foil-covered top,
into the  soil column through  a sampling template.  These tubes  were removed
sequentially and  placed into five container  treatments.  The procedure  was
repeated,  thus providing duplicates of the  five container  treatments. Undisturbed
samples were  extruded directly  into containers  and disturbed samples were
generated by removing  soil  from the cores in 7 to 10 aliquots during the transfer
step. Disturbed samples were  placed in jars  or  freezer bags that  had little
headspace, but these treatments  gave  poor  recoveries of VOCs  Undisturbed
samples that had little  container headspace  gave better  recoveries than those that
had large container headspace.
                                       52

-------
       Core extrusion into  methanol yielded the highest VOC concentrations
(Siegrist and Jenssen, 1990).  Improvement in VOC  recovery  that was  attributed to
methanol preservation was  81% for  TCE and approximately  10% for chlorobenzene.
VOC recoveries in the methanol treatment were 28  to  83% less than the predicted
concentrations  based on  calculated soil  sorption estimates. The highly volatile
methylene chloride  showed extremely high replicate variability and no  significant
effect  due to  any treatment.  The study did not use a PT preparation  step in the
analysis it employed solvent extraction that was modified for the  methanol
treatment.

       Use of methanol  as  a  vapor trap  and as an extractant for alkylbenzenes
(ethylbenzene, toluene, and p-xylene) from oven-dry soil is described by  Rhue et al.
(1988). This study compared the efficiency of methanol for  trapping  ethylbenzene
vapors  with that of  activated charcoal. Agreement between the two methods at
relative vapor pressures of 0.09 to  0.31 was quite good  (methanol trapped 97% of the
amount trapped by activated  charcoal). Rhue et al. (1988) then compared the
measurement of vapor-adsorbed alkylbenzenes by soils  and clays using a
gravimetric  method and  methanol  extracts.  Gravimetric measurement  has  been
used by many researchers (e.geChiou and  Shoup, 1985; Ong and Lion, 1991a), but
Rhue et al. (1988) preferred  measuring vapor adsorption by methanol  extraction of
the solids (allowing them to  analyze either vapor  or sorbed concentrations by UV-
Vis  spectrophotometer  or  high  pressure  liquid chromatography).  Methanol
extraction and gravimetric  measurements  of alkylbenzene vapor  adsorption  were  in
good agreement (differences averaged less  than  10%) for bentonite, kaolin, and a
sandy  aquifer sample.

       A vapor fortification method to  spike  dry soil with VOCs has been described
by Jenkins and Schumacher (1987) and has been further developed by  Hewitt et al.
(1992) and Hewitt (1993). Reproducible soil-VOC contamination is achieved in dry
soil subsamples (1 to 2 g subsamples) by exposing soil to a vapor mixture of VOCs
in a closed  desiccator. Relative standard  deviations  (RSD) of  less than  9% were
observed for TCE,  benzene, and toluene,  and the RSD for trans-1,2-dichloroethene
was  14 to 23% (Hewitt et al., 1992).  Maximum concentrations  of soil VOCs are
achieved after 4 to  5  days of exposure  (Hewitt, 1993). Dry spiked soil can then be
sealed  in glass ampules (Hewitt, 1993) or capped in 40-mL vials with a  modified lid
that is attached directly to  the PT  sparger  (Hewitt et al., 1992). Soil concentrations
of the  spiked, dry soil remain constant for at least  14  days. The ampulated  soil
samples are suggested as blind performance  evaluation  materials and are also
useful  in  studies  of sampling and  analytical methods.
                                        53

-------
 FIELD  SAMPLING STUDIES

       Urban et al. (1989) recognized the potential for VOC losses during
 transportation and  storage from jars that may not seal  well and the potential for
 VOC  losses during laboratory sample preparation. They  compared  data  from
 samples that were  immersed in methanol in the field and  analyzed  by the  medium-
 level method (for  samples  containing contaminants at greater than 1 fig/g)  with
 data from samples that were  analyzed by the  standard,  low-level soil  method
 specific  in the EPA  Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)  Statement  of Work (SOW,
 7/87).  Samples known to be  contaminated  with  seven  chlorinated solvents were
 obtained with a split-spoon sampler. Material was added to fill  either an empty  40-
 mL vial or a preweighed 500-mL wide-mouth jar that contained  250 mL of
 methanol and a mixture  of three  surrogate compounds. Results  showed  excellent
 recoveries of surrogate compounds in the  methanol-preserved samples.  The
 samples  preserved  in methanol always had greater concentrations of each VOC
 than the corresponding 40-mL vial samples. For  example,  the  results showed 2 to 50
 times more TCE and 15 to 100 times more 1,1,-dichloroethene  in the methanol-
 immersed samples  than in the corresponding 40-mL  vial samples. A systematic bias
 was introduced by the protocol of collecting  the methanol sample before the
 conventional sample in this study. The results, however, have been confirmed in
 other field investigations (Hewitt,  1992; J. Smith, personal  communication).

       Conventional sample collection and  analysis were compared with limited
 disruption sampling and a field headspace method  in a  study by Hewitt (1992). For
 the conventional sample, a 40-mL VOA vial was filled  with soil, shipped and stored
 at 4 °C, subsampled in the laboratory, and analyzed by PT/GC/MS within  14 days of
 collection.  The limited disruptive  method consisted of taking  a  subsample with  a
 subcoring device in the field,  placing  it in  either an  empty vial that  had a lid
 modified for direct attachment to a sparger or a vial containing methanol,  and
 analyzing the sample by PT/GC/MS within 14 days of  collection. (A hand-held
 VOC Photo Vac probe was used to determine whether the sample  concentration
 was "low" or "high" and thus to be analyzed by the low-level or the high-level
 procedure.) The  field method  involved placing a subsample in a  vial containing  30
 mL of water the  air above the soil/water was analyzed  by  direct injection in a GC
 within  2 days of collection. Results are shown in Figure 3. Log-log  plots of
 collocated samples  showed 1 to 2 orders of magnitude more TCE measured  by the
 limited  disruptive method as compared with conventional  sample  collection  and
 analysis (Figure  3a). The  headspace analysis and limited disruptive method gave
very similar results (Figure  3b). Collocated  headspace measurements  were 1 to 3
orders  of magnitude greater than measurements  by  the conventional procedures
                                       54

-------
    10*
CL
3
M'i'iTi  I'l'irj  i'I'm  I'lTrj  I'i'a
=-              1000/1               -
         ,i,i,iJxi , i.ul i  ,iii.d i ,MJ,I  i .1.1
10
                                               10
                                                 3 e
                      fcl 'I'lTJ I  'ITFj I 'ITq I  'I-IT| I  Tr
             CONVENTIONAL PT/GC/MS
                     10"*    10"*     10"'     10°     10'     10*

                                   LD PT/GC/MS
                         I0g
                         10'
                        10'
                      U

                      X
                        10"
M'l'ITj  I 'I'lTJ  I'l'ITJ  I 'ITfl  I'I'lJJ
                              .lil.iil  i.i.ul I.I.I.L!  i .I.I.L!  i .i.i.h
                           10"*   10"*    10"
                   10°     101
                                  CONVENTIONAL  PT/GC/MS

    Figure  3.  Collocated soil  samples analyzed  by conventional PT/GC/MS,  limited
    disruption (LD)  PT/GC/MS, and headspace (HS)  GC.  Soil concentrations in mg
                            TCE/Kg soil (after Hewitt, 1992).
                                           55

-------
(Figure 3c). To  determine whether  degradation  of TCE  could  be responsible  for
the discrepancies, seven headspace  samples were  set aside, stored inverted (soil on
Teflon-lined septa)  at room temperature, and monitored by repeated readings for 21
to 25  days. Little or no  decrease in the TCE concentrations  was  observed. Loss  of
analyte during the sample transfer step (shown by Jenkins and  Schumacher, 1987;
Maskarinec et al., 1988; Siegrist and Jenssen, 1990) and throughout the  storage time
in the vial prior to conventional analysis are implicated in this study.

       Three  sampling  procedures for TCE-contaminated  soil were investigated by
Slater  et al. (1983).  (1) Two subsamples (approximately 5  g each)  were taken from
the ends of freshly  collected soil cores and  placed in three successive  plastic freezer
bags. After cold storage, the  soil was  transferred to 5  mL of methanol. An aliquot
of the methanol  was subsequently analyzed  by PT/GC  with  a Hall detector. (2)
Brass  liners, with four sampling  ports drilled into the  sides and covered with Teflon
tape, were capped with rubber, placed in freezer  bags, and stored cold until analysis.
Four  subsamples were  removed in  the laboratory, placed in  methanol, and  analyzed
as in Treatment 1. (3) Entire 15 x 2.5 cm soil cores were slid into glass jars,  sealed,
placed in three successive plastic freezer bags, and stored cold  until analysis. The
analysis consisted of a 20-h heated nitrogen purge of the entire jar and a charcoal
trap  collection of VOCs, followed by carbon disulfide extraction  of the charcoal,
then by gas chromatographic  analysis  of the extract. Treatments 1 and 2  were not
adequately sealed, and  TCE was  detected in the  plastic bags  prior to soil analyses.
Treatment  3 also had samples that were not properly  sealed, although the
concentrations  in the plastic bags were less  than  occurred for treatments 1 and 2
Treatment  3 showed TCE levels  1 to  2 orders of magnitude  greater than
neighboring samples in the  other two treatments (statistically significant at the  5%
level).  Coefficients of variation ranging  from 0 to 190%  were found on replicate
subsamples by the first two treatments. (No coefficient of variation could be
reported where the entire  800-g sample  was analyzed in Treatment  3.) Slater et al.
(1983) concluded that the differences  in TCE concentrations  resulted from  natural
soil heterogeneity. Variability  in  the 5-g samples resulted in  a  statistical analysis
which  concluded that eleven 5-g  samples would have to be analyzed from a single
15 x 2.5-cm core  section  to be 60%  confident that the estimated value for TCE was
within 100 mg/kg of the true value.

      The effect of sample size on soil-VOC concentrations,  noted by  Slater et al.
(1983) above has been mentioned by other researchers as well. Bone (1988)  suggested
that sample size  influenced results of  VOC  sediment samples that were sent to two
different  laboratories as a blind  split.  Acid  and  base-neutral  extracts  obtained  by
using standard priority pollutant protocols were  in  good  agreement,  but the
                                        56

-------
       Eynon  and Rushneck (1988) examined a curious  phenomenon arising  from
the comparison of compounds  detected by the Toxicity Characteristic  Leaching
Procedure  (TCLP) and corresponding  concentrations  found by direct analyses.
Many  compounds were detected by  the TCLP test without being  detected by direct
analysis, even though leaching  procedures  were not as  analytically rigorous  as
direct  analysis procedures. In this  comparison of 112 samples, volatile compounds  at
or above  the  detection limit obtained by the  TCLP test but below detection limits
by direct  analysis (Method  1624, USEPA,  1982) in  three or more samples included
methylene chloride (probably laboratory contamination), 2-propanone, toluene,  1,2-
dichloroethane,  ethylbenzene, 2-butanone,   1,1,1-trichloroethane, and  chloroform.  It
was  suggested that the relative sample  size for the TCLP procedure is larger than
that  for direct analysis and that the larger  sample  size  could  explain the  greater
sensitivity of  the  TCLP.

       Poulsen and Kueper (1992) contributed further to the determination of
appropriate sample size.  They demonstrated  the effects of mesostructure (stratified
sands) on  the  advection of a  pure phase  NAPL (tetrachlorethene). Within a few
days after release of tetrachloroethene  onto a field soil, the compound  was
distributed in  distinct stringers  occupying  sand laminations  that were  separated  by
a  few to  several  centimeters. Estimates of the  appropriate sample size  to recover
pure stringers were on the order of cubic  millimeters.  Samples  much  larger than  a
few milliliters  in volume would be necessary to obtain  an estimate of the mean
concentration  in this  soil. The authors  used 50 g (or approximately 36 mL) samples
to estimate bulk properties.

Spatial Variability

       An  arbitrary increase in the VOC sample size beyond the current 1- to 5-g
size  is likely  insufficient to resolve  VOC  sampling problems.  Sampling design must
address the long- and short-range  spatial variability of VOCs  in the field. Mitchell
et al.  (1993) measured soil  VOCs at a  land treatment unit used for disposal of waste
oils and solvents.  Samples (176) were collected from  21 borings over approximately
650 m2(0.7 acre).  Borings were collected to a depth of 6.4 m using a hydraulic  probe
and samples were obtained  at approximately  1-m intervals. A  field GC and heated
headspace  technique (see  "Field Methods for  Determining  Soil Gas and Soil VOCs)
was used  to analyze 10- to 20-g subsamples for seven chlorinated aliphatic
compounds. Data obtained  clearly demonstrated the  extreme  spatial  heterogeneity
of soil VOCs  at the  site. The  total soil-VOC concentrations  varied from 6 [ig/kg to
154,000 fig/kg, and 90% of the  sample  VOC concentrations were  between 94 ng/kg
and 20,100 fig/kg. The authors  suggest that very high sample  densities are needed  to
                                        57

-------
estimate the total mass of VOC within contaminated soil  or to visualize a three-
dimensional  soil-VOC  distribution.

SAMPLE  STORAGE  AND PRESERVATION

Constraints on the Container  Material

       The ideal  material  for sample storage will maintain the  sample integrity
 without  degradation  of container  material.   Sample  integrity  can be
compromised by either sorption or leaching  of organic contaminants of interest.
Leaching  may be resorption of sorbed compounds or a release of "free"  plasticizers
present in the bulk polymer.

       Ten materials, including  three  metals,  six synthetic polymers, and borosilicate
glass,  were evaluated for halocarbon  loss in  laboratory experiments (Reynolds et al.,
1990). Borosilicate glass  was the only material that did not diminish the halocarbon
concentrations. Loss rates for  stainless steel  were negligible for all  compounds
tested  except bromoform  and hexachloroethane,  which  had losses amounting to 70%
after 5 weeks. The more halogenated compounds were generally removed before
the less halogenated compounds in solutions  exposed to metals.  Of  the polymers,
the rigid  polymers polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE,  Teflon®; E.I. Du Pont De
Nemours,  Inc., Wilmington,  DE) and  rigid polyvinylchloride  (PVC), were the best.
At low concentrations of halocarbons in water,  these polymers showed little
adsorption during the  5-week  experiment.  At high concentrations,  however, the
hydrocarbon  solvents cause  compound-specific  swelling of polymers. Sorption  rates
at high activities  are dependent on concentration  and this makes them difficult  to
estimate.  Therefore, if  methanol or other  solvent preservatives are  used,
borosilicate glass is the best choice for storing samples. Also,  after a polymer
container  is  used, the  containers can  become an important source of contamination
and should not be  reused.

       Use of stainless  steel  and polymer materials for  suitability as  well casing
materials was reviewed by Parker (1992).  Stainless steel is susceptible to corrosion
in some soils (low pH,  presence of H2S,  and  high salt content). Sample integrity  of
metals is  affected by stainless steel, but organics  will not be affected by  stainless
steel as long  as the soil  is not corrosive and adequate  decontamination procedures
are followed. PTFE is  highly  resistant to  chemical  attack. However, the rate and
extent  of  sorption  of chlorinated alkenes  and chlorinated  aromatics  from aqueous
solution is greater for PTFE than for  rigid PVC.  For example, Parker et  al.  (1990)
found that loss of TCE was  10% after 8 h  for PTFE, but losses for rigid PVC were
                                        58

-------
only 6% after 1 week.  Rigid  PVC is resistant to  chemical attack unless  exposed to  a
nearly saturated solution  of a PVC solvent.  PTFE leaches very little
contamination, but rigid PVC was a very close second. Parker (1992) concluded that
rigid PVC and stainless steel were the best choices for sampling organics,  but  that
PVC  should be  used if sampling for both organics and metals. Only threaded  PVC,
PTFE, and  stainless steel should be used because solvent bonding  introduces
additional  contaminants.

Studies  of VOC-Spiked  Storage Times

      Zarrabi et al.  (1991)  reported on a batch approach to achieve "homogeneous"
VOC-spiked soils  for use in  studies of sampling  methodology and potentially for
use as performance  evaluation samples. Methanol solutions of VOCs were  added to
moist soil in glass jars  and  mixed by tumbling for 120 seconds. Same-day results
showed benzene recoveries  of approximately 40% for  one  soil and  less than  10% for
another soil; chlorobenzene recoveries were 70% to 85% and 29% to 59%,
respectively, for the same two soils. Coefficients of  variation for  benzene  and
chlorobenzene determinations  ranged from 3% to 30%. Statistically  significant
VOC  losses occurred within 3 days of spiking, and recoveries and variability in the
data were "completely unacceptable" after 8 days.

      Studies on storage  of VOCs in water have shown  that no leakage through
septum  seals will occur if vials (40-mL VOA) are properly filled and sealed
(Maskarinec et al.,  1990). The highly volatile chloromethane showed no loss over  56
days when stored in glass vials with Teflon-lined  caps. In  water, loss  of 1,1,2,2-
tetrachloroethane with a concomitant increase in  TCE occurred after 28 days  at
4  °C. Trichloroethane appeared to degrade to dichloroethene; changes were noted
only after 56  days  at 4 °C. Degradation of aromatic  volatiles, especially styrene and
ethylbenzene, became apparent after storage for 28 days at 4  °C, but it could be
stopped by  adding  any of three  acid preservatives tested  (hydrochloric acid, sodium
bisulfate, and ascorbic acid).  Degradation rates were  faster  at 25  °C. Within 28
days at 25  °C the disappearance of tetrachloroethane  was accompanied by a
concomitant rise in  the concentration of TCE, and decreasing levels  of
trichloroethane  were accompanied by  increased  concentrations of dichloroethene.

      Storage of soil VOC-spiked standards, obtained by  using the same water-
spike  mixture  and  the  same compounds as above  (stock solution was mixed and
stored in a Tedlar bag; Maskarinec et al., 1990), has been less  successful  than the
storage of VOC-spiked  water  samples. Maskarinec et  al. (1988) followed  the
concentrations of a mixture  of 15 volatile compounds in three  soils for 56 days. The
                                        59

-------
 authors  concluded at that time that 14  days  should be the  maximum holding  time
 prior to soil-VOC analysis,  although there is no rigorous data analysis to support
 the  statement.  In the same study, Maskarinec et al. (1989) showed very good initial
 recoveries of the  highly volatile  compounds  bromomethane (66% mean recovery)
 and chloroethane  (86%  mean  recovery) in three soils.  The readily  degradable
 compound,  styrene, had very low recoveries in two of the soils, producing a mean
 recovery of 25%.  Day-zero recoveries of 17 VOCs  from three soils varied from 14 to
 118% (mean recovery  of 67%  for all compounds) with standard deviations less than
 25%.

       Data on  soil-VOC concentrations after storage of these samples were
 presented by Jenkins et al. (1993). Data were expressed as  the maximum holding
 times (MHT) for the three soils, stored at 4, -20, or -70 °C.  The sandy loam soil lost
 VOCs rapidly under all storage conditions; MHT values were  0 to 3 days for most
 of the compounds tested. The  silt loam  soil had MHTs of 0 to  14 days  after storage
 at 4 °C  (mostly less than 3 days). At -70 °C the MHTs for the silt loam  were  also
 low (mostly 0 to  1 days). At -20  °C, the silt  loam MHTs were fairly high MHT
 values were 18  days  or more  for all compounds (but bromomethane) as  calculated
 by the  American  Society of Testing  and Materials  (ASTM) method  and MHT
 values of 3 to  56 as calculated by the alternate  method. The third soil, an
 undescribed U.S. Army  Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency reference soil was
 presterilized by  an unspecified method.  This  soil exhibited MHTs of more  than  100
 days (calculated by either method) for 10 of the  compounds  when stored  at -20 °C.
 Tetrachloroethane  was the only compound that had an MHT of less  than 14 days at
 -20 °C.

      Achieving a good  sample seal after soil has touched the sealing surfaces of a
 vial  is very difficult. This assertion was demonstrated  by observing  the  loss of
 methanol from  vials that had been smeared with soil and then wiped with  a gloved
 hand before capping (Hewitt,  1992). Seven of ten soiled VOA vials  showed
 continuous weight loss, but no weight loss  was observed in  stored VOA vials that
 had not  been smeared with soil. The use of a syringe  body with the nose removed
 to subcore soil in the  split-spoon  sampler is recommended because the syringe can
 be wiped free of soil particles, avoiding the problem of particles contacting the vial
 sealing  surfaces.

      Addition of polymer absorbents (molecular sieve 5A  and florisil)  to reduce
 sample volatilization losses during sample transfer  steps increased spiked recoveries
(significant at p=O.05) for 42 of 60 soil/compound combinations tested (Zarrabi  et al.,
 1991). Still,  recoveries in the presence  of the solid absorbents were less than 50% for
                                       60

-------
two of the three soils. In a 95% sand sample, the addition of the polymer
absorbents and  traditional  sample transfer steps showed increased  VOC  recoveries
over the  modified  sample lid/sparging  procedure.

       Amin  and Narang (1985) reported that spiked frozen (-5 °C)  sediment samples
can be stored as long as 7  days without significant loss of volatiles. Sediment
samples were sealed in vials, then spiked with a combination of 16  VOCs,
immediately  frozen, stored,  and connected to a  purging system without opening the
vials. Losses  were negligible on days 2,  3, 4,  and 7, but losses of as much as 50%
occurred between  14  and 60 days of storage. Addition of  a  small amount of
methanol  (1 mL methanol and  1.5 mL water per 5-g  soil sample) preserved the
volatiles exceptionally well; negligible losses occurred over a period of 90 days.
Recoveries for 11 VOCs in samples preserved with methanol ranged from 57 to 99%
on  day 1  and from 28 to 95%  on day 90. Information on how the GC data were
quantified and when  the  internal  standard (fluorobenzene) was  added were  not
given.

       A  study of  five preservation methods for gasoline-contaminated  soil
evaluated the following  storage treatments  (1)  rubber-capped brass tubes, room
temperature,  (2) rubber-capped  brass tubes, 4 °C,  (3) rubber-capped  brass tubes  on
dry ice, (4) 40-mL VGA vial with 5 mL methanol at room temperature, and (5)40-
mL VGA vial with 5 mL methanol at 4 °C (King, 1993). Separate batches of
laboratory-contaminated soil (at approximately 100 to 200 mg/kg as total petroleum
hydrocarbons, TPHs)  were used for each treatment.  Six samples from  each  batch
were analyzed for TPH concentration at 0, 3, 6,  10, and 14 days after sample mixing.
Treatment 1  (tubes that  had not been  refrigerated)  showed  a mean concentration of
91 mg/kg on  day O decreasing  to less than 20 mg/kg by day 6. Treatment  2 (tubes
with refrigeration) showed an initial concentration of  120  mg/kg decreasing to  34
mg/kg  by day 6. Treatments 3,  4, and 5 did not show any deterioration exceeding
the "precision of the  analytical methods" (statistics not provided)  during the 14-day
holding time.

SUMMARY  OF SAMPLING  AND PRESERVATION METHODS

       Lewis  et al. (1991) reviewed sample  design, selection of sampling devices,
sample  collection procedures,  and shipping considerations  for soil VOCs The  topics
covered by this review include sample preparation procedures  and  storage and
preservation  techniques.
                                       61

-------
       Laboratory subsampling prior to  analysis has been  shown to  create large
losses of VOCs (Amin and Narang,  1985; Maskarinec et al., 1988; Siegrist and Jenssen,
1990; Zarrabi et al.,  1991; Hewitt, 1992). For example, losses during subsampling and
weighing were reported at 20% to 80% (Zarrabi et al.,  1991) and averaging 60%
(Maskarinec  et al., 1988). Losses from chilled soil ranged from 7% to 36% as
compared to losses ranging from  14% to 53% for nonchilled  soil (Amin and Narang,
1985). Homogenizing the soil  prior to  weighing a sample  creates higher  losses than
samples  transferred  without  homogenization (Siegrist and  Jenssen, 1990). Samples
stored in containers with a  large headspace lose more VOCs upon transfer than
samples  stored in containers with little headspace  (Siegrist and  Jenssen, 1990). The
general trends outlined above  mask the large variability of losses among
compounds  on the  same soil and the reported variability in losses of a single
compound among soil types.

       Storage of soil  samples for VOC analyses presents  more  challenges than
storage of water samples because prevention of volatile and  degradative  losses is
more complicated to accomplish and to verify. Soil samples  are much more
difficult  to  seal than water  samples due to the  difficulty  of  removing all particles
that stick on the top rim of the jar.  Slater  et al. (1983) found that 31 of 54 jars of
soil leaked VOCs during 3 to 5 weeks  of  storage,  shown by the  presence of VOCs  in
bags used to enclose the samples. Hewitt (1993) reported 7 of 10 vials leaked when
sealed after  carefully removing soil from  the  rims of the  vials. The  addition of
polymer absorbents  to prevent volatile  losses may be  helpful, especially  in  sandy
soils, but a separate step to  extract VOCs from the absorbents  may be required
(Zarrabi  et al., 1991; Pignatello, 1990a). Soil placed in jars  or vials via a subcorer
should largely eliminate  the  leaky seal  problem (Hewitt, 1993).

       Contract  Laboratory Program (CLP)  storage procedures  currently  allow  soil
samples  to be refrigerated (4 °C) for as long as  10 days after receipt at the
laboratory (USEPA  1991). Studies generally show, however, large losses  of analyte
within 3 days when  contaminated soils are stored at 4 °C (Maskarinec  et al.,  1989,
Zarrabi et al., 1991; King,  1993).

       Degradation in refrigerated water samples  was  successfully halted  by the
addition  of acids, including sodium  bisulfate (Maskarinec et al.,  1990). In contrast,
soils are much harder to acidify. If soils  are  acidified, artifacts arising from
changes  in the conformation of  organic matter and changes in  clay surface  charges
may affect soil VOCs. Biocides such as sodium azide (Pignatello, 1990a)  or mercuric
chloride  (Zarrabi et al.,  1991) can be used as preservatives, but these biocides are not
easy to use  and dispose  of. The preservation of gasoline-contaminated, fine-grained
                                        62

-------
sand by keeping samples on dry ice was demonstrated by King (1993); however, the
results were  reported as total petroleum  hydrocarbons,  so  no compound-specific
preservation can be distinguished.  Jenkins et al. (1993) found that -20 °C was
superior to -70 °C for preserving two  soils, a silt loam and a presterilized soil
(method unspecified). However,  in a third soil, a sandy loam, significant losses of
VOCs occurred at each temperature, -70 °C, -20 °C, and 4 °C (Jenkins et  al., 1993).

      The preservation of soil VOCs  by adding the soil sample to a preweighed jar
of methanol  in the field has been recommended by many researchers (Jenkins  and
Schumacher,  1987; Bone 1988; Urban et al., 1989;  Siegrist and Jenssen, 1990; Lewis et
al., 1991;  Hewitt et al., 1992; King, 1993) and accepted as a standard procedure by the
ASTM (D 4547-91, "Standard Practice for .Sampling Waste and Soils for Volatile
Organic"). Methanol acts  as a biocide and prevents loss by  volatilization.  The
amount  of methanol  necessary to  prevent  biodegradation and volatilization  has not
been determined however, Amin and Narang (1985) found that 1  mL added to 5 g
of soil prevents loss of VOCs in  frozen  soil.  Methanol provided a vapor trap that
was as effective as activated carbon for retaining ethylbenzene in a closed system
(Rhue et  al.,  1988).  The analytical complications in a methanol-preserved sample  are
addressed  in  the next section.
                                        63

-------
                                   SECTION 7

                        ANALYTICAL  METHODOLOGY
       This section describes (1) the SW-846 analytical methods (PT/GC/MS) used to
 measure soil VOCs when extremely  accurate and sensitive data are  essential and (2)
 studies of modifications  that might  improve the PT/GC/MS  procedures. Methanol
 has  been shown to  be  a useful preservative,  and therefore, studies of the analytical
 sensitivity  and precision that can be achieved with methanol  extracts are also
 discussed.  Finally,  studies that  describe analytical procedures  for  measuring the
 nonequilibrium  or  entrapped  fraction of VOCs  are  presented.

 SW-846 METHOD  8240 AND  RELATED METHODS

       SW-846 Method 8240 (USEPA, 1986, 1990) outlines the analysis of volatiles
 from solid waste matrices by PT  extraction and  packed column gas  GC/MS
 detection. Proposed SW-846 Method 8260 (USEPA, 1990) is analogous to SW-846
 Method 8240, except that a capillary  gas chromatography column is used in place of
 the packed  column and the method is accompanied by an expanded  list of analytes.
 Related SW-846 methods (USEPA, 1990) include extractions, preparations, and
 screening methods Method 5030, purge and trap; Method 3580, waste dilution
 (methanol);  Method  3810 (formerly Method 5020),  screening by headspace analysis
 and  Method 3820,  screening by hexadecane  extraction. Analysis of specific  groups
 of analytes may be performed by  other GC methods  as follows: Method 8010,
 Halogenated Volatile Organics, by halogen specific detector; Method 8011, 1,2-
 Dibromoethane and  l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane; Method 8015, Nonhalogenated
 Volatile  Organics, by flame  ionization detector;  Method  8020,  Aromatic Volatile
 Organics, by photometric ionization detector  (ketones and ethyl ether);  Method
 8021, Halogenated  and  Aromatic Volatiles, by electrolytic and conductivity
 detectors in series,  capillary column;  and Method 8030, Acrolein, Acrylonitrile, and
 Acetonitrile, by flame ionization  detector.

      SW-846  Method 8240  suggests screening samples by hexadecane extraction or
by headspace analysis prior to GC/MS analysis to allow for  the estimation of
appropriate sample  size  (1 g,  5  g,  or methanol extraction) Samples  that are  likely
to contain greater than  1  mg/kg of an analyte are  highly contaminated  and must be
first  extracted  into methanol (1 or 4 g wet soil in 10 mL methanol).  An aliquot of
the methanol is placed in water before purging  to  avoid overloading the gas
chromatagraph/mass  spectrometer.
                                       64

-------
       Methods for the  analysis of soil VOCs used  in the Superfund Contract
Laboratory Program (CLP) are essentially SW-846 8240 and 8260 (USEPA, 1990) with
additional QA/QC  data  requirements.  Both packed  and  capillary  column methods
are included as  described in the Statement of Work for  Organics  Analysis,  Exhibit
D,  Sections I through IV (USEPA,  1991). Optional  sample screening by hexadecane
extraction is described and a medium-level soil method by methanol extraction,
analogous to the RCRA high-level soil method, is given  in the CLP Statement of
Work  (USEPA,  1991). Similarly, methods for  the analysis of VOCs in water and
wastewater,  "Purgeables"' Method 624  (EPA  Environmental Monitoring  Systems
Laboratory-Cincinnati)  and "... isotope dilution GC/MS  Method 1624 (EPA Office
of Water Regulations and Standards, Industrial Technology Division), also use PT
devices with GC/MS  detection.

MODIFICATIONS OFFERED  TO IMPROVE SOIL  PURGE-AND-TRAP
ANALYSIS

       PT analysis,  as originally developed for the EPA, involved a 5-mL water
sample, an 11-min purge with an inert gas  at 40 °C to a Tenax-GC trap,  and a  4-min
resorption to a packed GC column (USEPA, 1982).  Solid-sample matrices are  ran  in
like manner by adding 5 mL of water  to approximately 5 g of solids, often
producing a foam, which makes stripping  difficult,  clogs the  equipment, and
requires  cleaning between samples  (Amin and Narang, 1985).  Historically, soils and
other  solid samples analyzed with the  PT  extraction have low recoveries and
erratic precision (Lesnik,  1993).

       Modifications to  the PT technique  that are designed to improve  recovery of
VOCs from water  are briefly  mentioned.  Whole  column cryotrapping  was
suggested by Pankow and Rosen (1988) as an alternative  to the Tenax-GC traps.
Cryotraps placed after the Tenax trap are another option; many laboratories add it
to remove water  before introducing  the sample into  the  GC  (Westendorf,  1992)
Increasing the purge  temperature has also been suggested to  improve purge
efficiency, and recent work suggests an alternative to replace oil or water  baths
with mantle-style heaters (Jiang  and Westendorf, 1992).

       As compared with water samples, soil and sediments show poor spike
recoveries and high detection limits (Hiatt,  1981; Charles  and Simmons,  1987). The
spike  recoveries that are  reported in accordance with SW-846 Method 8240/8260
procedures are in fact relative  recoveries  that do  not reflect the absolute recoveries
or "efficiencies" of compound recovery. Recoveries  are calculated  by the  relative
response factor of surrogate compounds, that is  the  peak area ratio of  a surrogate
                                       65

-------
 to  an internal  standard  compound.  Both  internal standards  and  surrogate additions
 are  added just  before  the  sample is sparged.  The internal standards and  surrogates
 are  subject to the same  matrix  effect,  and the response  ratio does not quantify that
 matrix effect.

       Ward (1991) has suggested that  the internal standard be introduced  in  a
 microvolume sample loop  placed between the sample  vial and the GC inlet.  A
 valve  would  allow the internal  standard to be swept out by the  carrier gas during
 the  purge step. In this configuration,  the  internal standard would be  used to
 monitor  the GC/MS  system, and the surrogates  would portray the matrix effects.

       Techniques to improve extraction efficiencies  from soils  and solid  matrices
 over that achieved during  the conventional purge (designed  to  extract VOCs from
 water) have been developed.  Cryogenic vacuum  extraction  was  developed by Hiatt
 (1981) for extraction of VOCs from  sediment  and fish tissues. Method  5032, to be
 included in the Third Update to SW-846,  is a vacuum distillation/cryogenic trap
 procedure followed by GC/MS,  applicable for extraction  of a wide array of organics
 from a variety of solid matrices (Lesnik, 1993).

       Closed-loop stripping into a  cryotrap with steam  distillation of the  volatiles
 onto a Porapak N column was described by Amin and Narang (1985).  VOCs  were
 then extracted from  the  absorbent column with  methanol and the eluate  was
 analyzed by GC.  Recovery  of VOCs from spiked, frozen soil samples ranged from
 60 to 100%.

       Although altering  the  conductivity of the  solution has been reported to
 increase  recovery of VOCs from water samples  (attributed to salting out),
 recoveries from soil  samples generally  do  not increase with  the conductivity  of the
 solution. Charles and Simmons (1987) investigated the effect of sediment type and
 conductivity of the desorbing solution (0.01 M  and 0.1  M KH2PO4) on the recovery
 of PT analyses. The  salt content of the desorbing solution did not affect VOC
 recoveries from any  of the three soils. Zarrabi et  al.  (1991)  tested saturated NaCl
 solution as  a purging solution and found improved recovery  of ketones but slightly
 lower recoveries for  the majority of VOCs.

      The largest single  improvement to soil-VOCs analysis  by  PT is  arguably the
modified lids for 40-mL  VOA vials  that can be attached directly to  a  sparging
apparatus  to avoid the  laboratory subsampling  step (Maskarinec et al.,  1989; Zarrabi
et al., 1991; Hewitt et al., 1992).  Teflon couplings  (valves  and fittings) are added in
place of the standard Teflon-faced septum  and screw cap that also allow  the
                                        66

-------
addition  of water  and internal spiking  solution to the sample before sparging.  This
modified lid configuration  has been discussed  in the section "Obtaining and
Maintaining VOC  Samples."

ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY OF  SOLVENT EXTRACTS

      Analytically, soil methanol  extracts are  constrained to have  lower  sensitivity
than the conventional  water PT extraction. The soil is effectively  diluted when it
is  placed in methanol  in any proportion except equal parts of soil  and  methanol.
Furthermore, the  addition of  methanol  to  water in  the  sparger decreases  the
recovery of at least some  compounds by  decreasing the aqueous-vapor distribution
coefficient. Kiang  and Grob (1986) showed that headspace concentrations of eight
VOCs  decreased as methanol  in water increased from 1 to 20%. The effect was
most pronounced  for the dichlorobenzenes. Control  values with  no methanol
addition  were not  presented because  the VOC spike solution was in methanol.

      Zarrabi et al.  (1991)  reported that the addition of methanol to soil in the
sparger at 1 and 10%o just before  purging  gave mixed results depending  on the soil.
Differences  were  not significant at the  5% level as  compared with  the  control  (no
methanol).  Trends in the data showed that 1% methanol had no  effect or improved
the VOC recovery for a soil consisting of 95% sand  and 0.14% organic carbon, but
10% methanol tended to decrease  the VOC recovery in the  same soil.

      The  CLP SOW methods (USEPA, 1991) and SW-846 Methods 8240, 8260,and
3580 (USEPA, 1990) use methanol to dilute samples that are too high in one  or more
analyte. Methanol  is added to soil  (1:10 soil:methanol) and  the methanol extract is
diluted into water  (1:5 methanol:water, but this may vary) to quantify soil VOCs at
levels of 500 to 1,000 fig/kg.  Using the high-level methanol extraction method (SW-
846 Method 8240), Hewitt et al. (1992) reported a detection limit on  the order  of  1000
ug/kg.  The  relative  standard deviation  of laboratory vapor-fortified soil by PT  of
the methanol extract ranged from 0.5  to 38%,  with a mean value of 12% at high-
level fortification and  16% at low-level fortification  (Hewitt et al.,  1992).  Urban et
al. (1989) reported a detection limit of about 250 ^ig/kg for five VOCs (100  to 200 g
wet soil  in 250 mL  methanol) using  the medium-level methodology in the  CLP
SOW for Organics Analysis (7/87). Slater et al. (1983) used approximately equal
parts of  wet soil  and methanol and reported a quantification limit of 1,000 fig/kg
for TCE using a GC with  a Hall  detector.

      Urban et al. (1989)  showed  that  methanol-preserved samples  contained  as
much as an order  of magnitude more VOCs than samples collected and analyzed by
                                       67

-------
low-level methods. Duplicate analyses of methanol-preserved samples  were
examined as well as duplicates generated by spiked soil/methanol samples  left
overnight to equilibrate. Analyses  of TCE,  present  in high  concentrations  in the
samples (at  1,000 to 11,000 fig/kg), gave relative percent differences of 0 to 6% in
duplicates. Spiked duplicate studies using five compounds (1,1-dichloroethene, TCE,
benzene, toluene,  and chlorobenzene) showed  recoveries  well within the CLP
acceptance criteria (which  vary by compound, but generally  fall between 60 and
140%) and relative percent  recoveries less than 9% (CLP acceptance  values of 21 to
24%) for all compounds, except  1,1-dichloroethene.  Recovery of 1,1-dichloroethene
was inconsistent; two of the four samples showed 86 to 96% duplicate recoveries of
1,1-dichloroethene with 0.3  to 1.0 relative percent differences; two  other samples
showed 50 to 80% recoveries and 28 to 36 relative percent differences for this
compound.

      A comparison of methanol  and tetraethylene  glycol  dimethyl ether
(tetraglyme) for extraction  of soil VOCs was  reported by Jenkins and  Schumacher
(1987).  They  found that methanol was  better  than  tetraglyme at recovering four
volatiles  from  soil.  Three  vapor-contaminated soils  were studied.  Methanol was
found to extract 28.4% higher amounts of chloroform from  a soil  high in organic
matter (6.7%  organic matter). Methanol was also easier  to  handle than tetraglyme
because it is less viscous and does not foam during  the  PT analysis. Tetraglyme,
like other ethers, is  susceptible to the formation of peroxides, which can be
dangerous.

EXHAUSTIVE EXTRACTIONS  TO RECOVER SORBED VOCs

      Sawhney et al. (1988) investigated methodologies for recovering 1,2-
dibromoethane  (EDB) from  field-contaminated soil  samples.  They noted  that  most
methods  for  analyzing organics in soil are predicated  on short-term  spike-recovery
results (usually less  than 24 h equilibration time). Soil samples that had years to
equilibrate with EDB in the field were  tested  for residual levels by PT, thermal
desorption, and solvent extraction  techniques.  Results  for EDB recovered in their
Cheshire fine  sandy  loam soil by PT and by using various solvent extractions are
compared in Table 4. Hot methanol (75  °C for two 24-h  periods) was used by the
authors  as  a base to compare  extraction efficiencies.  Purging as recommended  by
SW-846 Method 8240 (11 min at 40 °C) resulted in 1.3% of the total recovered by
using hot methanol (90 ug  EDB/kg soil). A series of repeated purges for longer
time periods, including two  purges at  80 °C,  amassed 26.1% of the  EDB recovered by
hot methanol. Acetonitrile  and acetone, heated to 75 °C, led to slightly higher  EDB
recoveries than by  hot  methanol.  Room  temperature (20 °C) extractions using
                                       68

-------
methanol, acetone, and acetonitrile for 24 h resulted in 60,  65, and 78% recoveries of
the hot methanol  extraction, respectively. Using a ratio of  5  g  soil to 25 mL
methanol, and a GC with an electron capture  detector, their  detection limit was 1.8
ug/kg. The  concentration found in soils by hot  solvent extraction  ranged from 30
to 200 [ig/kg; PT recovered 1-2  fig/kg.

       Sawhney et al. (1988) also tried thermal resorption  on the  EDB-contaminated
soil. Temperatures of 100 °C to 200 °C were  investigated. They recovered
essentially no  EDB from field-contaminated soil, but subsequent  extraction  with a
solvent showed that  the  EDB  concentration  remaining in the soil  declined from
79% to 3.6% as the  temperature increased, leading to the  assumption that EDB was
destroyed by the  high temperature  necessary  for thermal  desorption. In  contrast  to
the field-contaminated soil,  freshly spiked soil was completely  and efficiently
thermally desorbed at 120 °C and at 200 °C if desorbed immediately yet freshly
spiked soil,  allowed to sit for 18 h prior to thermal desorption, yielded only 49% in
thermal desorption.  Apparently, surface  exposed EDB is  desorbed rapidly,  but
entrapped EDB (which must diffuse from distant  microsites) degrades before
desorbing.

       Pavlostathis and Jaglal (1991) investigated the  water-induced resorption of
TCE from a soil (silty clay  texture, 0.13% organic  carbon)  that had been
contaminated for  at least 18 years. Their objective was to produce a laboratory-
scale  model of possible  remediation  techniques The  effect of pH  on TCE
resorption was  negligible. The  ionic strength  of the  aqueous desorbing  solution
had no effect until the ionic strength exceeded 0.1  M, which produced a  slightly
decreased desorption.  The authors characterized the "total" TCE in the field-
contaminated soil  as  that obtained from  a 13-h methanol  extraction at 20 °C.
Continuous  leaching in a soil column (approximately 24,000  pore  volumes)
extracted  72% of the  methanol-derived "total"  soil TCE.  Total  soil TCE  found by
extraction with cold  methanol was estimated at approximately 2000  fig/kg.

       Steinberg (1992) investigated the residual vapor-phase sorption of 1,1,1-
trichloroethrme, TCE, benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene  at spike concentrations
of several parts-per-thousand. An  oven-dried calcareous soil (9.8%)  carbonate as CO2,
0.16% organic carbon) was incubated for 2 to 87 h at temperatures of 5 °C, 25 °C,
and 45 °C.  The labile fraction was then allowed  to evaporate at 32 °C for 24  h. The
residual fraction was analyzed by  (1) hot solvent extract, methanol slurry at 65  °C
for 24  h; (2) PT as described in SW-846 Method 8010 (1,1,1-trichloroethane only); and
(3) a  "field  extraction procedure" of hexane:water,  25 (volume basis).  Sparging
(Method 8010) recovered  approximately 10% of the 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and the
                                        69

-------
          TABLE 4. COMPARISON OF PURGE-AND-TRAP VERSUS SOLVENT EXTRACTION FOR ANALYSIS OF AGED,
                                           EDb-CONTAMINATED SOILS*
Extraction Method Successive
Purge"
Purge and trap 1
2
3
4
5

Solvent N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Solvent
NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

methanol
methanol
methanol
methanol
methanol
methanol
acetonitrile
acetonitrile
acetone
Time
(hr)
0.18
0.18
0.5
0.5
0.5

24 (2X)
24
16
4
48
4
24
24
24
Temperature
(°C)
40
40
40
80
80

75
75
75
75
20
20
75
20
75
Relative Recovery
Per Purge (%)
1.3
1.0
3.6
9.6
10.9

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Relative
Revocery (%)**





26.1
100
94
93
69
68
28
114
78
113
Abbreviation : EDB = 1,2-dibromoethane; N/A = not applicable
* Data compiled from Sawhney et al., 1988.
+ Consectutive runs/purges on the same sample
** Based on recovery of two 24-hour extraction

-------
quick  hexane extraction  recovered approximately 40%  of the residual  concentration
found  by the hot  solvent extraction. The  increase in the residual  fraction with
incubation time was  shown  to  be a pseudo first-order process. The effect of
temperature showed  a  substantial activation  energy for entrance of VOCs into  the
residual  fraction.

       Supercritical fluid extraction  (SFE) is  an innovative extraction  technology
that is most appropriate  for  semivolatiles  research but may prove  useful  for
volatiles.  SFE  may provide  a  rapid technology for  extraction of  semivolatiles.
One of the unsolved problems for extraction of volatiles is  the appropriate
extractant.  Solvents often produce large peaks  that mask the VOC peaks  of
interest. Hawthorne et  al. (1992)  reported  on  SFE  of semivolatiles  and some
relatively  volatile  organics,  including  n-octane. They noted  that native analytes
generally  extract more  slowly than  spiked analytes from  the  same matrix  and that
recoveries  are  highly matrix dependent. An exhaustive  SFE,  if found, could  greatly
decrease the extraction time  for slowly desorbing VOCs.

SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY

       PT methods that were developed for extracting VOCs  from water  have poor
recovery and low  precision  when applied  to  soils. Surrogate  recoveries (reported as
the peak  area  ratio  of surrogate/internal  standard) do not reflect  the  extraction
efficiency or actual recovery from a soil matrix because  surrogate compounds and
internal standards  are  introduced  to the sample essentially simultaneously and
therefore,  are subject to  the  same matrix  effects. The addition  of a micro volume
sample loop to  add internal  standards  directly into the GC, bypassing  contact with
the soil, has been suggested to alleviate this problem (Ward, 1991).

       The addition of  salts to the sparging solution to produce a "salting out" of
organics has not been effective  in tests with soil (Charles and  Simmons, 1987;
Zarrabi et al., 1991). Vacuum extraction with a cryogenic trap recovers VOCs and
other organics  (including  nonconventional  VOCs) more efficiently than PT and
will be offered as Method 5032 in the Third Update to SW-846 (Hiatt, 1981; Lesnik,
1993).

       The use of methanol  to  immerse field  samples as  a preservative  technique
produces an analytical  sensitivity  of  approximately 250 to  1,000  fig/kg when
analyzed by PT/GC/MS (Slater et al.,  1983  Urban et al., 1989; Hewitt et al., 1992).
This loss  of sensitivity results from  the dilution of the soil in the  methanol and the
decreased  vapor  pressure of VOCs in  methanol. As  the  amount of methanol  in the
                                        71

-------
sparger increases, the purging efficiency  decreases.  Using  direct injection but more
specific detectors than MS,  detection limits can be decreased (e.g., 1.8  ug EDB/kg soil
with an  electrolytic conductivity detector, Sawhney et al.  1988). Methanol is
generally superior to tetraglyme  as a VOC extractant because recovery of VOCs
from  tetraglyme was poor from  a soil high in organic matter (Jenkins and
Schumacher, 1987).

       More rigorous extraction  techniques such  as  hot methanol  or  pulverization
of the soil (discussed under "Nonequilibrium Sorption" in section "Interphase
Transfers") have  shown that some fraction of the soil VOCs  are entrapped in
microsites in the soil or diffuse  from them too slowly to be solubilized during the
PT extraction.  Levels of EDB in  ground water  exceeding  health standards  were
traced to a slow diffusion of EDB from soils that had concentrations of 30 to  200 ug
EDB/kg  soil when extracted by hot methanol and  1 to 2 gg EDB/kg soil when
extracted by PT (Sawhney et al.  1988). Thermal  resorption was  observed to destroy
the entrapped  EDB, but quantitatively recover fresh  (less than 18 hr) additions  of
EDB (Sawhney et al.,  1988).

       Cold methanol was used to  extract a soil that was contaminated with  TCE 18
years  prior to  analysis (Pavlostathis and  Jaglal,  1991). Continuous leaching (24,000
pore volumes)  with water extracted 76% of the 2000 fig/kg found by  extraction  with
cold methanol. A  soil that  was  contaminated in the  laboratory by exposure  to a
mixture of VOC vapors was extracted by  hot methanol, hexane/water, and PT
(Steinberg,  1992).  PT and hexane extracted approximately 10% and 40%,
respectively, of that which was  extracted by  hot  methanol.
                                       72

-------
                                    SECTION 8

     FIELD  METHODS  FOR DETERMINING SOIL  GAS AND  SOIL VOCS
      Field methods for assessing soil  VOCs  offer advantages under many
circumstances.  Literature that describes  the uses of soil-VOC field methods is
briefly reviewed below,  followed by soil-gas studies,  soil headspace methods, and
finally,  advanced  field  analysis  techniques. Throughout this  section,  studies that
compare field  data  with laboratory data were targeted.

JUSTIFICATION FOR FIELD  METHODS

      The EPA has encouraged  development  of field  technologies for on-site
analysis of samples  at hazardous waste sites (Wesolowski and Alwan,  1991; Fribush
and Fisk, 1992).  This impetus has resulted in  improved efficiency for many short-
term  environmental  projects that are  delayed by time-consuming, expensive,  and
cumbersome laboratory procedures (Spittler, 1992; Wesolowski and Alwan,  1991).
Instrumentation that provides  qualitative  VOC screening includes total  organic
analyzers  with photoionization  (PID) or flame ionization (FID)  detectors.  These
detectors have been available  for approximately 20 years. Numerous  brands  and
types of field-deployable GCS have been  and continue  to be  developed which
permit identification and quantification of volatiles with increasing  precision and
sensitivity. Field methods are  no  longer limited to screening methods.  Mobile
laboratory  and field-deployable  instrumentation is  beginning  to rival  the
identification and low detection limits of SW-846 Method 8240.

      Field methods,  calibrated  by relating field data  to  laboratory results, can
offer  considerable  reductions in cost and time (e.g., Cornell,  1992).  Duplicates of a
representative  portion  of the field  samples  (10% of the field  samples  is suggested)
may be sent to the laboratory for analysis. Calibration curves  of field versus
laboratory  data can then be  generated. The greatest uncertainty in data  derives
from  nonanalytical  factors:  site  heterogeneity, sample-matrix variability,  sample
collection procedures, and  sample handling, transport,  storage,  and preparation
procedures. Cornell  (1992)  concludes  that  the analysis  method will not seriously
compromise data integrity as long as proper  calibration  of laboratory and field
methods  is observed.

      Field measurements  are particularly  attractive  for analyses  of soil  volatiles
because VOC  losses during storage are eliminated with field analyses. On the other
                                        73

-------
 hand, the relatively  simple  headspace analyses by hand-held  total organic carbon
 detectors gives highly variable  data  that are subject  to  many interferences.
 Correlations between headspace  analysis with total organic  carbon detectors  and
 laboratory PT  analysis is  poor (Siegrist, 1992). Total  organic  carbon analyses  are
 particularly inappropriate  in soils of high,  naturally  occurring  organic contents
 (Nadeau and Tomaszewicz, 1988).

       Field analyses for soil  VOCs has been  specifically recommended by Mitchell
 et al.,(1993) for yet another reason.  They  examined the spatial heterogeneity  of  soil
 VOCs at a small (650  m2) waste solvent landfill. The variability of VOC
 concentrations  measured  in  176  samples demonstrated that  an enormous number of
 samples are needed to visualize  the  three-dimensional distribution  of soil  VOCs  or
 to estimate the total concentration of soil VOCs Mitchell et al. (1993) advised that
 sampling designs  ought to  incorporate increased numbers  of spatially  separate
 measurements,  to be achieved by using less  expensive, on-site analyses.

 SOIL-GAS MEASUREMENTS

       Soil-gas measurements  have become  an increasingly important analytical tool
 at hazardous waste  sites.  They are a  relatively rapid  and cost-effective means to
 (1) locate  a contaminant  source;  (2) delineate a ground-water  contaminant  plume;  (3)
 plan monitoring-well, soil-boring, or vapor-extraction locations; (4) assess leakage of
 underground tanks,  lines,  and subsequent vapor  migration; (5) monitor migration of
 gases from landfills, impoundments, industrial  facilities;  and (6) monitor the
 progress of a cleanup (Devitt  et al., 1987).  The relative concentration of a
 contaminant is measured,  the  spatial  distribution  is mapped,  and  correlations  with
 soil  or  water contaminant concentration(s)  are developed site by  site.  Analytical
 determinations  of soil gas range  from generalized  organic-vapor sensors to field-
 deployable  or mobile laboratory GCS. Reviews of methods and available
 technology for  soil-gas sampling include Balfour et al. (1987), Devitt et al. (1987),
 Jowise et al. (1987),  and Marrin and Kerfoot (1988).

      Properly executed,  soil-gas analysis gives a subsurface reading of the vapor
phase concentration,  and  provides data that cannot be reproduced with confidence
once the soil is removed from its place  in the field.  The measurements are used  as
relative  comparisons at a given location  because  of the many  soil,  compound,  and
environmental factors  that  influence  the  vapor phase  concentration (Reisinger et
al. 1987; Marrin and Kerfoot,  1988). General correlations  of soil gas and soil VOCs
are often poor (C. L Mayer  and  E. N. Amick, personal communications,  1992). Soil
gas concentrations may be unreliable  if  measured during periods of large
                                        74

-------
barometric pressure changes, during or immediately after a rain,  or  across a  site
with  considerable  variation in soil  texture (either  vertically or horizontally).
Golding et al.  (1991)  however, reported fairly good correlations of TPH in soil gas
versus soil headspace  and between soil gas and  soil TPH by an Iowa laboratory
procedure  (Iowa Department of Natural  Resources Method OA-1;  methanol
extraction followed by PT  modeled  after SW-846 Method 8015).  The data were
generated from 12 sites  in Iowa  near  underground gasoline storage tanks Soil
samples  were removed from the same drill hole  as  soil-gas samples (soil samples
collected subsequent to and deeper  than  gas  samples). The  data spanned  3  orders of
magnitude of laboratory soil TPH (5 x 103to 5 x 106[ig/kg)  and  logarithmic
transformations were  analyzed. Correlation coefficients of 0.63  to 0.73  revealed
substantial scatter in the data,  but statistically significant results  at the 99%
confidence level.

       Influence of temporal, environmental,  and site factors on  soil-gas
concentrations  are  reported by soil-gas researchers.  Johnson and Perrott (1991)  and
Smith et al.  (1990) noted that  soil-gas  concentrations  corresponded positively with
seasonal temperature  fluctuations  (increased  soil-gas  concentrations  coincide  with
increased temperatures). Yeates and Nielsen  (1987) noted that differences between
winter and summer concentrations occur when the frozen soil acts as a  "lid,"
creating  higher soil gas concentrations during winter because  release to the
atmosphere  is  inhibited. Jowise et al.  (1987) reported that daily average variability
for soil  gas  samples  taken from the same  drill hole  and depth were approximately
7% (they considered  this  analytical variability)  and the  relative  standard deviation
of data from the same gas probes  over 4  weeks was 40% (estimated to be  7%
analytical and  33% field variability). Many studies noted that the vapor
concentrations  were lower  in  dense or fine-grained material and  increased  in
coarse-grained  material (Kuhlmeier  and Sunderland,  1983  Marrin and Thompson,
1987), Concomitant changes in soil  moisture  with soil texture may  account for  some
of this effect.

       An understanding of the site  and  the  fate and transfer properties  of VOCs is
critical when interpreting soil-gas  data (e.g., Yeates and Nielsen, 1987).  The presence
and relative concentration  of a VOC in  the soil  gas at the time of sampling will
depend on many  factors,  including  the  distance  from the source of contamination;
physiochemical properties,  age, and distribution of  contaminants soil  properties
including porosity, water  content, permeability,  texture,  and composition,  large-scale
geologic or anthropogenic  barriers or conduits for diffusion;  and environmental
factors  including  temperature,  barometric pressure, relative humidity,  and wind
velocity  at the soil surface  (Mehran  et al., 1983). Given  that the vapor phase is
                                         75

-------
 subject to short-term variability as a result of changes  in temperature and  soil
 water content, soil gas data are best applied to rapid  assessment  of recent spills or
 leaky tanks  and to trace ground-water  contamination under relatively coarse
 materials (Mehran et al., 1983).

       Marks et al. (1989) reported on the correlation  between soil gas and ground-
 water concentrations of benzene  and toluene  for  48  sites contaminated  with
 petroleum hydrocarbons.  Observed soil-gas concentrations  were  poor predictors of
 absolute levels  of  benzene and toluene  in  ground water.  Soil-gas  contamination,
 however, was a relatively good predictor of presence  or absence of ground-water
 contamination based on Chi-square tests  that included site-specific and  pair-specific
 factors. Sandy soils had the lowest incidence  of false positives and false negatives,
 and clayey soils had the highest incidence  of false results. Where  the distance
 between soil-gas and ground-water samples was less than 1.5 m, the accuracy of
 predictions was 90% for benzene  and  75% for toluene.  In  contrast, where distances
 were more than 3 m, the correlation between  soil gas  and ground water  fell  to 53%
 for benzene  and 63% for toluene.

       A  study used to design  and implement  soil clean-up at the Phoenix-Goodyear
 Airport (Rosenbloom et al.,  in press) found long-term soil-gas monitoring provided
 better estimates of the  total  mass  of TCE than soil-VOC analyses.  Soil-gas
 estimates were 2 to 100 times greater than soil-VOC estimates of the  total mass of
 TCE (which may still  have  been  lower  than  the  actual quantity  present). Soil
 VOCs were  measured after field  immersion of samples  in methanol and  thus only
 the highly contaminated soil  samples contributed  to the soil-VOC estimates  of TCE
 mass.  Total  mass  estimates were  based on  an  equilibrium,  steady-state model,  and
 Kocwas used to estimate  the  sorption  coefficient.

       Smith et al. (1990) found good correlations  between soil gas and shallow
 ground-water concentrations  of TCE at Picanniny Arsenal in New Jersey.
 However, the concentrations of TCE in  soil [measured by  the hot  methanol extract
 method of Sawhney et al. (1988)] were 1 to 3  orders of magnitude greater than
 predicted by soil-gas concentrations and  aqueous-phase  organic  carbon partitioning.
 The contribution of the aqueous phase  (Henry's Law)  was less than 3% of the  total
mass of TCE sorbed. They suggested  that the increased  concentrations of TCE in
 soil  resulted  from nonequilibrium,  or  slow resorption  of TCE from soil  organic
matter relative to the dissipation by degradation and diffusion of soil  gas.
                                       76

-------
      Fiber-optic  organic-vapor  sensors are a potentially novel method  of analyzing
soil gas. Lieberman et al. (1991) and Apitz et al. (1992) are  using a pulsed-laser fiber-
optic  fluorescence technique for evaluation of fuels  in  soil.  The fluorescent
response of fuels  varies with soil  surface area of dry soils. Fluorescent  response
was decreased  by the addition of water to sand and increased by the addition of
water to clay (Apitz,  et al., 1992).  Barnard and Walt (1991) report on a fluorphor-
polymer combination  that responds  to the  adsorption of organic vapors They
chose a  system that is sensitive  to benzene, toluene,  ethylbenzene, xylene,  and
unleaded gasoline. Calibration for field use  was to be assessed in the  next phase  of
their  research.

SOIL HEADSPACE  METHODS

      Soil headspace  methods estimate soil VOCs by measuring the concentration
of VOCs in the vapor phase above a soil-water mixture. Soil  samples are  placed  in
a suitable jar, vial, or plastic bag to  which water is added or has  already been
added, and the  headspace concentration is measured  generally within a  few hours
after the sample was  collected.  The  volume of water added is adjusted to  create  a
constant headspace volume for comparison of standards and samples. After being
shaken for a short time, a sample  of the gas above the  soil-water mixture  is drawn
by syringe and  analyzed  using a portable or field-deployable GC. If the  jar is
heated before  a sample is drawn, it is  called a heated headspace method.

      Headspace methods assume  rapid  equilibrium between soil and water and
between water  and air. However,  soil  resorption rates have been shown to depend
on VOC residence times after  an initial  rapid resorption phase and  therefore,
headspace  methods  potentially  underestimate  contaminant  concentrations  and may
result in false negatives (Pavlostathis and Mathavan,  1992).  Hewitt et al.  (1992)
contend that  lower values and false  negatives are more  likely with samples that
must be shipped,  stored,  and subsampled in the laboratory  than with headspace
analysis that  is  performed within a day of sample collection. In either case,  an
exhaustive  resorption is not possible using water over a few days time.  One may
deduce that dynamic  (PT) headspace  procedures using 40°C and 11 minutes will
extract essentially  the same fraction  of soil VOCs as headspace techniques and this
was demonstrated  by  the comparison of collocated limited disruption  PT/GC/MS
and HS/GC samples (Hewitt, 1992) in the section  "Obtaining and Maintaining VOC
Samples."

      Static headspace is generally limited  by the  sensitivity of the  procedure.
Increasing the  temperature or equilibration time of headspace analysis would be
                                        77

-------
 expected to increase the concentration desorbed.  Inescapably,  the  detection  limits
 of headspace analysis  are limited by the volume of vapor that  can be
 accommodated  by direct injection  (as  opposed to the PT  preconcentration step.)

       Crockett and  DeHaan (1991) evaluated the  effects of various headspace
 procedures  on  (unidentified) GC peak heights  in  eight  field-contaminated soils.
 They  showed that increasing the amount of soil in a vial, while holding  the
 headspace essentially constant,  increased the vapor concentration  of the  VOCs
 although the rate of increase in peak  height was less than the rate  of soil mass
 added. Use of  a saturated NaCl solution  extractant in  place of water produced
 significantly larger peaks for one of the eight test  soils, and gave no  statistically
 significant differences in the other soils. Methanol  extraction (5  g soil in 5 mL
 methanol) followed by headspace analysis of an aliquot of the methanol  in water
 showed  variable recoveries  by compound. As compared to  water,  methanol
 appeared to  be more efficient in extracting or  partitioning the late eluting peaks,
 but  tended  to be less  efficient in extracting or  partitioning the early eluting  peaks.
 The relative effects  of methanol as an extractant  and on  the partitioning  of  the
 VOCs between  solution and vapor phases cannot be  determined from  this study.
 Dry-soil heated headspace  analysis was more effective  at recovering VOCs than
 water, although the  authors  reported  analytical  problems related to condensed
 water  in the GC as  a drawback to heated headspace analysis.

       Hewitt et al. (1992)  compared PT analyses, using modified VOA vial lids for
 low-level samples and  the methanol extraction for high-level  samples  (per  SW-846
 Method  8240),  with  headspace analyses of laboratory- and field-contaminated  soils.
 Soil samples of 1 to  3  g were extracted in 5 mL water for the low-level PT method,
 in 20  mL of methanol  for the high-level PT method, and in  30  mL of water for the
 headspace analysis. A  field-portable Photo Vac GC with a packed  column and a
 photoionization  detector that provided  baseline  resolution  for benzene, toluene,
 TCE,  and trans-1,2-dichloroethene was used for headspace analysis. In laboratory-
 fortified  samples, the correlation  between PT analysis  and headspace  analysis  was
 essentially unity with a slope of 0.948  for a soil  that had 1.45% organic carbon. A
 second soil with 6.69% organic carbon, gave  statistically significant (0.5% level)
higher concentrations by  PT analysis for  19  of 28  compound/spike  combinations. A
statistically higher value (0.5% level) was found  by  headspace analysis  only once.
The  higher  concentrations measured by PT analysis were reported  using both the
high-level (methanol) PT procedure  and the  low-level (with  modified sparger  lids)
PT procedure. The differences  were greatest  for the  two compounds with the
highest octanol-water partition  coefficients, TCE, and toluene.  Benzene  and  trans-
 1,2-dichloroethene results showed little difference between headspace  and PT
                                        78

-------
analysis at a high  spike level. The PT analysis produced  statistically higher values
of these  compounds at low spike concentrations. Analytical precision  was  better
overall with  the  headspace method.

      Results from field-contaminated soil samples  showed no significant
differences between using  PT  and headspace analyses when samples were collected
by subsampling 2 to 3  g of soil directly from the split-spoon sampler (Hewitt et al.
1992). Field  spatial variability created large  standard deviations in the data for both
methods  of analysis and no differences due to  the analysis method were observed.
A second field-contaminated soil  was  sampled  from a well-mixed bulk sample.  It
had been  contaminated with TCE for at least 18 years and had been shown to
exhibit slow  aqueous resorption  of TCE (soil donated from study  of Pavlostathis
and Jaglal, 1991). Good sample precision and statistically different means (0.5%
level) between the two  analysis  methods were  found. Methanol PT analyses (high-
level  method) always  extracted more TCE than the  headspace analysis.  The
method differences were not attributed to organic carbon levels (only 0.13% organic
carbon in this  soil), but rather to the slow  resorption kinetics. Supporting  data
demonstrated increased concentrations  of TCE  in headspace samples as  the
extraction time (shaking) was  increased by successive 10 min intervals.

      Zoeller et al. (1992) compared laboratory  GC/MS by  SW-846 Method 8240
with  a field  static headspace  method  that incorporated  a  portable PT concentrator
to lower the detection  limits.  They reported that for soil  contamination  of less
than 5 ppm,  GC/MS results were generally more reproducible than field methods,
whereas at higher  contaminant levels,  field VOC analyses  were  comparable  to
GC/MS analyses.  The methanol  extraction for  highly contaminated soil  by Method
8240  reduced the precision and raised the  detection limits thus generating  field and
laboratory  data of similar quality.

ADVANCED FIELD  EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS  METHODS

      The concept of on-site,  real-time analysis  for VOCs and other pollutants
using field-deployable  GCs is  enormously  attractive.  As a  consequence,  field
analytical  capabilities  are  constantly  improving. The  positive identification  of
compounds at low  parts per billion soil concentrations is obtained by PT GC/MS.
Other GC  detectors may meet or exceed the sensitivity  of the mass  spectrometer,
but lack  the  positive compound identification of the mass spectrometer.  Field-
deployable mass spectrometers  are being developed (e.g., Trainor and  Laukien, 1988;
Eckenrode and Drew, 1991; Leibman et al., 1991; Wise  et al.,  1991).
                                        79

-------
       Wise et al.  (1991)  described investigations of two different types of direct
 sampling mass spectrometers for use as rapid  screening tools  for  VOCs in  soil,
 water, and air.  For water and  soil samples, volatiles  are  purged  from  the  sample
 without  a  preconcentration trap.  Quantification is accomplished by  integrating  the
 area  of  a reconstructed purge  profile for  the  ions  corresponding  to the  target
 analytes.  Purge efficiencies  of 20 to 90%  for benzene, TCE, and tetrachloroethene
 in  five different soil  matrices  were reported relative  to a Ph 7 water  purge.  (These
 efficiencies were achieved after spiked soils were  left undisturbed for at least 1 h
 prior to  analysis and  are  typical of vacuum-stripping  spike efficiencies from soil).
 Continued research on  the  development of methods  for  the  identification  and
 quantification of compounds in complex mixtures was suggested.

       Two other  field-hardy instruments  include  PT  systems.  Trainor  and Laukien
 (1988) described a complete GC/MS  system that can be operated from a  four-wheel
 drive vehicle.  It is based  on  a  quadruple  analyzer and  an  electron-impact
 ionization source that has both full scan and  selected ion monitoring capabilities.
 A  field-portable  GC/MS that has three operating modes,  including a purge and
 thermal  resorption  mode and  cryofocusing for light volatiles, has been  marketed
 and discussed at scientific conferences (Eckenrode  and Drew,  1991). Both
 instruments have been  described  as  facilitating  screening operations.

       Leibman et  al.  (1991) discussed a transportable  GC/MS  designed  to meet the
 procedures  and QC criteria  outlined in SW-846  Method 8260. They reported  that
 the qualitative and quantitative  analysis of 68 target  compounds  and  associated
 internal standards  and surrogates can be accomplished in the field in an automated
 sequence  executed  every 25 minutes. If only screening is required, a steeper GC
 oven  temperature ramp  can reduce the time per sample.

 SUMMARY OF FIELD  METHODS

      Field methods for soil VOCs have the  specific  advantage  of avoiding  analyte
 loss during sample transport and storage. As with  other types of analytes,
 efficiency of time  and cost  are gained by  field analyses.  With soil VOCs however,
 the gains in time and efficiency may need  to  be converted to increased numbers  of
 sample analyses to provide  sufficiently accurate  data  over spatially variable  sites
 (Mitchell et al., 1993).

      Soil gas measurements have  many functions,  but the uses rely mainly on
relative  vapor  concentrations and site-specific  correlations.  The  vapor phase
concentrations are  influenced by  site,  soil,  compound, and environmental factors.
                                        80

-------
Vapors  of TCE and  gasoline components increase with increasing  soil temperature
(Smith et al.,  1990; Johnson and Perrott,  1991). Higher vapor concentrations of TCE
and BTX have been  reported to occur in coarse-grained material as opposed  to  fine-
grained  material (Kuhlmeier and Sunderland,  1985; Marrin and Thompson,  1987). In
general,  correlations of soil-gas and  ground-water contamination  are best in  coarse-
grained  soils and when the soil gas measurement is taken within 15 m of ground
water (Marks  et al., 1989). Vapor-phase fiber optic sensors are being developed  that
are expected to facilitate  rapid  measurement of soil gas for  many VOCs (Barnard
and Walt, 1991; Lieberman et al,  1991; Apitz et al., 1992).

      Soil (static)  headspace measurements  lack the  concentrating  step that  lowers
the detection limit of PT, but have been,  widely used for soil-VOC  field analyses.
Correlations of static soil  headspace  with soil-VOC measurements  have been shown
for soils with parts-per-million level contamination (Hewitt et al.,  1992; Zoeller et
al., 1992), but the  soil headspace data  may be suppressed in soils high in organic
carbon (Hewitt et al., 1992). Also,  concentrations  of VOCs in soils  with slowly
desorbing compounds  may be underestimated  by  soil headspace  techniques  (Hewitt
et al., 1992). Addition of NaCl  or  methanol to  the water in a static headspace
measurement created  mixed results in the recoveries  of various VOCs from  eight
different soils (Crockett and DeHaan,  1991). Dry-soil heated  headspace was more
effective at recovering VOCs than water, but  analytical problems  were
encountered related to condensation of water  in  the  GC (Crockett  and DeHaan,
1991).

      Field extraction and analysis techniques that are  utilizing  detectors of high
specificity  have been  reported.  Field-deployable  direct  sampling  mass
spectrometers (Wise et al., 1991) and field-deployable PT/GC/MS systems based on a
quadruple MS (Trainor and Laukien,  1988; Eckenrode and Drew, 1991) or ion trap
detector MS (Liebman et  al.,  1991) have  been undergoing field testing and use.  Field
instrumentation that can  achieve the  sensitivity and specificity  of SW-846  Method
8240/8260 is eminently expected within a few years.
                                        81

-------
                                    SECTION 9

                                 CONCLUSIONS


 FATE AND TRANSPORT  OF  SOIL  VOCS

       A  schematic of the generalized fate of  soil  VOCs is presented in Figure  4.
 The four phases of soil VOCs are shown in ovals. Processes that affect the total
 concentration of soil VOCs  are  in rectangular boxes.  Ultimately,  losses from  the
 vadose zone occur through  volatilization, degradation, or movement to ground
 water. Nonequilibrium  sorption of VOCs, that is,  slow sorption or  diffusion into
 microsites, creates  an "entrapped" fraction of  VOCs ("entrapped"  preferred term of
 Travis and Maclnnis [1992]). The quantity of  NAPL present  in a  soil is affected by
 the amount of NAPL released, the rate of the release, and the soil porosity.

       Equilibrium  among the  phases in the field  is not presumed.  Measurement of
 one phase, such as the vapor phase,  does not  generally provide estimates of the
 total VOC concentration in the soil (Marrin and Thompson, 1987 Smith et al., 1990;
 Rosenbloom  et  al., in press). Both errors in measurement and erroneous
 assumptions  of equilibria  contribute  to  poor  predictions.

       Estimates of soil  sorption  of nonpolar VOCs are based on  hydrophobic
 partitioning  (Koc values). Such  estimates do not account for:  (1) sorption by soils
 low in organic matter (<0.2%  organic matter), or  (2) long-term nonequilibrium
 sorption  (Smith et al., 1990). Sorption tends  to correlate with soil  texture or
 permeability  in soils  low in  organic matter; this  was reported in deep deposits  in
 California where high VOC  concentrations associated with clay deposits, low VOC
 concentrations associated with sand deposits  (Kuhlmeier and  Sunderland, 1985).
 Residual NAPL saturation may augment the  measured soil  concentrations  at some
 sites,  resulting  in  an artificially  inflated  estimate of the sorbed concentration for
 use in models.

       Adsorption of VOCs by  dry  soil minerals  is  2 to 4  orders of magnitude
greater than VOC sorption by wet soils (Chiou and Shoup, 1985; Ong and Lion,
 199la). Adsorbed nonpolar VOCs are readily displaced by water molecules, and
therefore as the relative  humidity approaches  100%, the physically adsorbed VOCs
are dislodged (Chiou and Shoup,  1985; Ong and Lion, 1991b). Vapor  sorption has  not
been found  under natural  field conditions, but the requirement for humid  air  in
vapor  extraction systems  can be  attributed to  vapor  sorption.
                                       82

-------
00
                               Volatilization ]
                 Migration to/from
                   Groundwater
Degradation
                                 Figure 4. Fate of Soil VOCs

-------
       Degradation of naturally  occurring VOCs is generally rapid in aerobic soils,
 mediated by  soil microorganisms, and limited by  the availability of  oxygen
 (Alexander,  1977;  Barker et al.,  1987). Halogenated aromatics also  biodegrade under
 aerobic  conditions,  although the  rate is  generally  slower  than that of the
 unhalogenated analogs (Kobayashi and Rittman,  1982; Wilson et al., 1983).
 Halogenated  aliphatic compounds degrade  anaerobically by  biotic  and  abiotic
 processes, but at rates much  slower  than  observed for  the  unhalogenated analogs
 (Smith and Dragun, 1984; Parsons et al., 1985). Evidence  for anaerobic  co-metabolism
 of chlorinated solvents,  that is,  anaerobic  degradation of  TCE, and similar
 chlorinated solvents in the ample presence of more  easily degraded  carbon
 compounds, has been shown (Cline and Viste,  1985; Wilson and Wilson,  1985).

       Movement of VOCs in soil occurs by vapor diffusion, vapor advection,
 NAPL  advection, aqueous diffusion, and  aqueous convection.  Vapor diffusion  is
 more rapid than liquid diffusion. The rates  of  vapor diffusion in soil  are
 influenced by chemical  concentration gradients, soil  permeability,  moisture  content,
 temperature,  and physiochemical properties  of  the VOC.  Rates  of  advection  are
 influenced by soil permeability,  moisture  content, pressure gradients, thermal
 gradients,  gravity,  and physiochemical properties  of the VOC  or the VOC mixture.

       Estimates  of soil-VOC  movement have traditionally been based  on vapor
 diffusion and convection with soil solution. Presumably,  vapor  diffusion is
 responsible for the appearance of two fluorocarbons in  deep  Texas sediments 44  m
 deep, 40 years after manufacture of  the compounds (Weeks  et al., 1982). Another
 example was  the appearance of  TCE near  the soil surface at a site in Arizona; here
 upward  diffusion from contaminated ground  water occurred over  approximately  40
 m in less than 30 years  (Marrin and Thompson, 1987). Movement of  NAPL  spills
 and leaks  in highly permeable soils, however, is probably dominated  by NAPL
 advection.  For example,  carbon  tetrachloride  contaminating ground water  177 m
 deep  (time of travel unknown) is believed to have moved by density-driven vapor
 advection (Falta  et al.,  1989).  At a different site, benzene, toluene,  and  xylene
 (solvents less  dense  than  water) were  found to have traveled 24.4  m in less than 7
years,  presumably moving  by gravity-driven  NAPL advection (Kuhlmeier and
 Sunderland, 1985).

      Mathematical models  of VOC movement are  predominantly research tools.
Few field  data exist with which to calibrate or  validate  field-scale models.
Differences in soil-gas and soil-VOC data  generally cannot be resolved by current
models.  Accurate measurements  of soil-VOC concentrations  are  necessary to
support  site  characterization,  remediation  design,  and monitoring efforts.
                                        84

-------
SAMPLE  SIZE

       Soil sample collection for VOCs is confined by the need for minimal soil
perturbation and  complete avoidance  of  soil homogenization  procedures  in an
effort to minimize loss of volatile analytes (Hewitt, 1992). Combine  this with the
constraint of only 1 to 5 g soil used for PT/GC/MS  soil-VOC  analysis (SW-846
Method 8240/8260, USEPA, 1986, 1990), and a severe sampling problem results.
Approximately 3  mL of unhomogenized  soil is collected  to represent a  core  that
might be 2.5 x 15 cm in size or almost 300 mL in  volume. Many researchers  have
noted that  the small sample  size used in a PT/GC/MS analysis  aggravates the basic
objective of characterizing soil-VOC levels at a field scale (Slater et al.,  1983;  Bone,
1988; Eynon and  Rushneck, 1989; Poulsen and Kueper, 1992; Hewitt et al.,  1992). An
analysis that utilizes  much larger soil samples,  or homogenization/subsampling
procedures that maintain  the VOCs, should receive a high priority in the  selection
of soil-VOC sampling and analysis  methods.

SAMPLE  PRESERVATION AND ANALYSIS

       Sample preservation for VOCs  is critical. There is ample evidence that 20%
to 100% of some VOCs are lost from soil stored cold (4 °C) in sealed vials or jars
(Maskarinec et al., 1988; Urban et al., 1989;  Siegrist and Jenssen, 1990; Zarrabi et al.,
1991; Hewitt,  1992; King,  1993). A large  part of the losses have  been attributed to  the
laboratory  subsampling  step (Maskarinec et  al., 1988; Zarrabi  et al., 1991). Part of the
reported losses are  likely to arise from volatilization  during  storage  because  of the
difficulty in ensuring adequate seals of sample jars or vials.  Use of a subcorer that
has been wiped free of particles  to place  soil in jars or vials  has been shown  to
overcome the  problem of poor seals (Hewitt, 1993). Losses caused by biodegradation,
most  commonly  biodegradation of petroleum compounds, certainly occur  in  some
soils.  Degradation can be  inferred in  samples when the  loss of  certain compounds
are accompanied  by  a  concomitant increase in daughter  products during  storage
(Maskarinec et al., 1989; Jenkins et al., 1993). Halogenated aliphanes, although
refractory in aerobic  culture  studies, may degrade  in some seemingly aerobic soils
by co-metabolism in the presence of a suitable carbon source  (Cline and Viste, 1985).
Preservation against  degradation  may not be  necessary for all compounds or  in all
soils,  but refrigeration at 4 °C is  not sufficient to halt losses  in  samples  prone to
degradation.

      The  procedures that have  been used to quantify soil-VOC losses  furnish
possible preservation  methods:  (1) sample collection and storage  in vials  with lids
modified to attach directly to the  PT spargeq; (2)  use  of the modified lids as  in
                                        85

-------
 option (1) with the addition of a biocide such as  mercuric chloride; (3) sample
 storage on dry ice;
 (4) addition of polymer adsorbent beads, such as Tenax, florisil,  or molecular  sieve
 5A to the soil sample;  and (5) placing the  sample in methanol in the field.

       Sample  collection into VOA vials with modified lids,  option (1), fails to deal
 with  the  sample size problem and may still incur biodegradation losses, especially in
 samples  contaminated by petroleum products.  The addition  of a biocide, option (2),
 may  reduce biodegradation, but  no studies were found that could demonstrate the
 effectiveness of biocides, and the disposal  of biocide-contaminated  soil is  not  trivial.

       The effectiveness of dry ice as  a preservative, option  (3), is described in only
 one study and data were for TPH, not specific compounds (King, 1993). More  data
 are needed to  develop  and evaluate preservation  by dry ice. Similarly, the use of
 polymer adsorbent beads, option (4), has been attempted in  only one  study (Zarrabi
 et al., 1991). The use of adsorbent beads such as Tenax in a removable trap has not
 been  tried.

       Of the  preservation methods  identified, the immersion of  a  sample in
 methanol (5),  has the most data  on which to base an evaluation. The  use  of
 methanol will  increase  the  method detection  limits over those attainable by low-
 level  SW-846 Methods 8240/8260. Low-level PT/GC/MS (SW-846 Methods 8240/8260)
 can detect low ng/kg levels of most VOCs, but the losses that occur before  analysis
 have  been observed at 1 to 3 orders of magnitude (Urban et al.,  1989; Hewitt, 1992).
 Therefore, when subsampling steps are included,  low-level PT/GC/MS is no more
 sensitive than methanol immersion or field headspace  techniques and  losses of the
 most  volatile compounds by conventional PT/GC/MS (e.g., vinyl  chloride) are
 practically guaranteed.  No  studies  have been found comparing low-level
 PT/GC/MS without  subsampling  and high-level PT/GC/MS   procedures.

       PT is not an efficient  extraction  for soil  VOCs That  is, spike  recoveries are
 erratic, varying  with  soil type, compound, and the time of contact  between the soil
 and VOC. The  addition of salts  or methanol to the purging solution has been
 investigated, but results are uneven and no overall  improvement is noted. Vacuum
 extraction with  a  cryogenic trap  may  be more efficient than PT, but  data  directly
 comparing the  two procedures are lacking. The addition of surrogates into  soil
 samples and internal  standards directly into  the  GC has been suggested (Ward,  1991).
These procedures  would expedite monitoring  GC/MS  performance with the
internal standards  and establish the  use of surrogates to measure the  matrix effect.
                                        86

-------
FIELD  METHODS

       Factors  cited in support of field analyses  include: (1) improved time  and cost
efficiency (Wesolowski and Alwan, 1991; Fribush and Fisk, 1992; Cornell,  1992); (2)
large analyte losses during sample transport  and storage  are avoided  (Siegrist, 1992),
and (3)  the large number of samples  necessary to accurately  characterize  a
heterogeneous  site  are only feasible using on-site techniques (Mitchell et al.,  1993).
The decision to  rely on  field methods or to corroborate field methods  with
laboratory  methods should be based on data quality objectives, the  relative
importance  of  site-specific nonanalytical factors (such as, extreme  site or  soil
heterogeneity),  and the stability of the VOCs of interest (e.g., highly volatile vinyl
chloride, readily degradable  aromatic  compounds).  The development of
performance evaluation materials (PEMs) is critical  to  the  QA/QC of field methods.
No  soil-VOC  methods can be adequately evaluated without accurate reporting  of
the efficiency of soil spike recoveries  and the use of soil PEMs.

       Correlations  between soil-gas  and  soil-VOC  concentrations  are site-specific
and often weak. Attempts to  predict soil gas from soil-VOC concentrations  or  soil
VOC from  soil gas concentrations differ by orders  of magnitude (Smith et al., 1990;
Rosenbloom et al.,  in press).  These  data indicate at least one  of the  following: (1)
assumptions of equilibria  among  sorbed, vapor, and  aqueous phases  do  not
correspond to field conditions,  or (2) measurements of either soil-gas or soil-VOC
concentrations  are  inaccurate  or  not sufficiently representative  of the  area  over
which the  estimate is applied.

       Soil-gas  measurements  are useful for rapid assessment of localized "hot spots"
of  contamination or to determine the relative  spatial distribution of contaminant
concentrations  at a site.  Soil-gas concentrations have been  seen  to increase when
soil temperatures increase (Smith et al., 1990; Johnson and Perrott, 1991) Erratic soil
gas  behavior is predicted to  occur during periods  of rapidly  changing  barometric
pressure  as would  be associated  with  large  thunderstorms (Massman and Farrier,
1992).

       Soil static headspace techniques are  essentially PT techniques minus  the
preconcentration  step. Static  headspace measurements  can  be readily performed in
the field and the correlation with laboratory PT  analyses can  be good, if the
laboratory subsampling step is avoided (Hewitt et al., 1992). Two  examples of soils
that had lower  recoveries of TCE measured by  an (unheated) headspace method
than by SW-846 Method  8240 have been reported: (1) soil high in  organic matter
(6.7% organic carbon) and, (2) soil that exhibited slow resorption  of TCE  (Hewitt  et
                                        87

-------
al., 1992).  Therefore, corroboration with laboratory procedures are still necessary. Dry-
soil heated headspace has been shown to be a more rigorous extraction procedure than
water-heated headspace, but analytical complications of water condensing in the GC
were reported (Crockett and DeHaan, 1991).
                                        88

-------
                                  REFERENCES
Abriola, L. M., and G.F. Finder. 1985. A multiphase approach to the modeling of porous
media contamination by organic compounds  1. Equation development. Water Resour.
Res. 21:11-18.

Alexander, M. 1977. Introduction to Soil Microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New
York

Amin, T.A., and R.S. Narang. 1985. Determination of volatile organics in sediment at
nanogram-per-gram concentrations by gas  chromatography. Anal. Chem. 57:648-651.

Anderson, T.A, J.J. Beauchamp, and B.T. Walton. 1991. Fate of volatile and semivolatile
organic chemicals in soils: Abiotic versus biotic losses. J. Environ. Qual. 20:420-424.

Apitz, S.E., G.A.. Theriault, and S.H. Lieberman. 1992. Optimization of the optical
characteristics of a fiber-optic guided laser fluorescence technique for the in situ
evaluation of fuels in soils. In, Proceedings of The International Society for Optical
Engineering, Vol 1637.  January 22, 1992, Los Angeles, CA.

ASTM, 1991. Standard Practice for Sampling Waste and Soils for Volatile  Organics, in,
1992  Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 11.04, p. 108-111.

Balfour, W.D., C.E. Schmidt, and B.M. Eklund.  1987. Sampling approaches for the
measurement of volatile compounds at hazardous waste sites. J. Hazardous Mater.
14:135-148.

Ball, W.P., and P.V. Roberts.  1991a. Long-term sorption of halogenated organic
chemicals by aquifer material. 1. Equilibrium. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25:1223-1236.

Ball, W.P., and P.V. Roberts.  1991b. Long-term sorption of halogenated organic
chemicals by aquifer material. 2. Intraparticle diffusion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25:1237-
1249.

Barker, J.F., G.C. Patrick and D. Major. 1987. Natural  attenuation of aromatic
hydrocarbons in a shallow sand aquifer. Ground Water Monitor. Rev. 7(Winter):64-71.
                                        89

-------
Barnard, S. M., and D.R. Walt. 1991. Fiber-optic organic vapor sensor. Environ.
Sci.Technol. 25:1301-1304.

Bear, J. 1979. Hydraulics of Groundwater. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Boethling R.S., and M. Alexander. 1979. Microbial degradation of organic compounds at
trace levels. Environ. Sci. Technol.  13:989-991.

Bone, LI. 1988. Preservation techniques for samples of solids, sludges, and nonaqueous
liquids, pp. 409-414. In, L.H. Keith, ed., Principles of Environmental Sampling.
American Chemical Society, Salem MA.

Bouchard, B.C., S.C. Mravik, and G.B. Smith. 1990. Benzene and naphthalene sorption
on soil contaminated with high molecular weight residual hydrocarbons from unleaded
gasoline. Chemosphere 21:975-989.

Boyd, S.A., and S. Sun. 1990. Residual petroleum and polychlorobiphenyl oils as sorptive
phases for organic contaminants in soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24:142-144.

Broholm, K, J.A. Cherry, and S. Feenstra.  1992. Dissolution of heterogeneously
distributed solvents residuals. Subsurface Restoration Conference, Dallas, TX, June 21-
24, 1992. Environmental Protection Agency, R.S.  Kerr Environmental Research
Laboratory, Ada,  OK.

Brusseau, M.L 1991. Transport of organic  chemicals by gas advection in structured or
heterogeneous porous media Development of a model and application to  column
experiments. Water Resour.  Res.  27:3189-3199.

Brusseau, M.L, R.E. Jessup, and P.S.C. Rao. 1991. Nonequilibriurn sorption of organic
chemicals: Elucidation of rate-limiting processes. Environ. Sci.  Technol.  25:134-142.

Brusseau, M.L., and P.S.C. Rao.  1989. Sorption nonideality during organic contaminant
transport in porous media. CRC Crit. Rev.  Environ. Control 19:33-99.

Charles, M.J.,  and M.S. Simmons. 1987. Recovery  studies of volatile organics in
sediments using purge/trap methods. Anal.  Chem. 59:1217-1221.
                                        90

-------
Chiou, C.T. 1989. Theoretical considerations of the partition uptake of nonionic organic
compounds by soil organic matter, pp. 1-29. In, Sawhney, B.L., and K Brown,
eds., Reactions and Movement of Organic Chemicals in Soils. SSSA Special Publication
Number 22. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI.

Chiou, C.T., L.J. Peters, and V.H. Freed. 1979. A physical concept of soil-water
equilibria for nonionic organic compounds. Science 206:831-832.

Chiou, C.T., and T.D. Shoup. 1985. Soil sorption of organic vapors and effects of
humidity on sorptive mechanism and capacity. Environ. Sci. Technol.  19:1196-1200.

Cline, P.V., and D.R. Viste.  1985. Migration and degradation patterns of volatile organic
compounds. Waste Management Res. 3:351-360.

Corapcioglu, M.Y., and A.L. Baehr. 1987. A compositional multiphase model for
groundwater contamination by petroleum products 1.  Theoretical considerations. Water
Resour. Res. 23:191-200.

Cornell, F.W. 1992. Site investigations: The role of field screening and analysis devices.
In, Proceedings of R&D '92, National Research & Development Conference on the
Control of Hazardous Material, February 4-6, 1992, San Francisco, CA. Hazardous
Material Control Research Institute, Greenbelt, MD.

Crockett, A.B., and M.S. DeHaan. 1991. Field screening procedures for determining  the
presence of volatile organic compounds in soil. In, Field Screening Methods for
Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Chemicals, February 12-14, 1991, Las Vegas, NV. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.

Devitt, D.A,, R.B. Evans, W.A. Jury, T.H. Starks, B. Eklund, and A. Gholson.  1987. Soil
Gas Sensing for Detection and Mapping of Volatile Organics. National Well Water
Association, Dublin OH. 270 pp.

Dilling, W.L., M.B. Tefertiller, and G.J. Kallos. 1975. Evaporation rates and reactivities
of methylene chloride,  chloroform, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene,
tetrachloroethylene,  and other chlorinated compounds in dilute aqueous solutions.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 9:833-838.

Dragun, J.  1988. The Soil Chemistry of Hazardous Materials. Hazardous Materials
Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD. 458 pp.

                                        91

-------
Eckenrode, B.A, and R.C. Drew. 1991. An evaluation of field processing and detection
limits for volatiles and semi-volatiles using a portable GC/MS system. Pittsburgh
Conference, March 4,  1991, Chicago, IL.

Eynon, B.P., and D. Rushneck. 1988. Comparison of results of TCLP and direct analyses
of environmental samples, pp. 406-419. In, Proceedings of Eleventh "Annual Analytical
Symposium. May  11-12,  1988, Norfolk, VA.

Falta, R.W., I. Javandel,  K Pruess, and P.A. Witherspoon. 1989. Density-driven flow of
gas in the evaporation of volatile organic compounds. Water Resour. Res. 25:2159-2169.

Fribush, H. M., and J.F. Fisk. 1992. Field analytical methods for Superfund.
Environmental Lab 4:3 6-41.

Garbarini, D.R., and L.W. Lion. 1986. Influence of the nature of soil organics on the
sorption of toluene and trichloroethylene. Environ. Sci.  Technol. 20:1263-1269.

Gierke, J.S., N.J.  Hutzler, and J.C. Crittenden. 1990. Modeling the movement of volatile
organic chemicals in columns of unsaturated soil. Water Resour. Res. 26:1529-1547.

Gierke, J.S., N.J. Hutzler, and D.B. McKenzie. 1992. Vapor transport in unsaturated soil
column: Implications for vapor extraction. Water Resour.  Res. 28:323-335.

Golding,  R.D., M. Favero, and G. Thompson. 1991. Comparison of field headspace
versus field soil gas analysis versus standard method analysis of volatile petroleum
hydrocarbons in water and soil. In, Field Screening Methods for Hazardous Wastes and
Toxic Chemicals, Second International Symposium,  February 12-14, 1991, Las Vegas,
NV. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.

Hamaker, J.W., and J.M. Thompson. 1972. Adsorption, pp. 49-143. In, Goring C.A.I, and
J.W. Hamaker, eds., Organic Chemicals in the Soil Environment. Vol I. Marcel Dekker,
New York.

Harmon,  T.C., W.P. Ball, and P.V. Roberts. 1989. Nonequilibrium transport of organic
contaminants in groundwater. pp. 405-437. In, Sawhney B.L. and K Brown, eds.,
Reactions and Movement of Organic Chemicals in Soils. SSSA Spec. Publ. 22. Soil
Science Society of America, Inc.  Madison, WI.
                                       92

-------
Hartmans, S., and J.A.M. de Bent. 1992. Aerobic vinyl chloride metabolism in
Mycobacterium aurum LI. Applied Environ.  Microb. 58:1220-1226.

Hassett, J.J. and W.L. Banwart. 1989. The sorption of nonpolar organics by soils and
sediments. In, Sawhney, B.L., and K Brow eds., Reactions and Movement of Organic
Chemicals in Soils. SSSA Special Publication Number 22. Soil Science Society of
America, Inc. Madison, WI.

Hassett, J.J., W.L Banwart, and R.A. Griffin. 1983. Correlation of compound properties
with sorption characteristics of nonpolar compounds by soils and sediments: Concepts
and limitations, p. 161-178. In, C.W. Francis and S.I.  Auerbach eds., Environment and
Solid Wastes. Butterworths, Boston.

Hawthorne, S.B., D.J. Miller, J.J. Langenfeld, and M.D. Burford.  1992. Physiochemical
and instrumental factors that can control SFE recoveries of neutral  and ionic pollutants
from environmental samples. Abstract No 679. Pittsburgh Conference Book of Abstracts.
PittCon'92. March 9-12,  1992. New Orleans,  LA.

Hewitt, A.D.  1992. Review of current and potential future sampling practices for volatile
organic compounds in soils. Proceedings from the  16th Annual Army Environmental
R&D Symposium,  23-25 June 1992, Williamsburg, VA.

Hewitt, A.D.  1993. Vapor fortification A method to  prepare quality assurance soil
samples for the analysis of volatile organic compounds. Abstract  from the National
Symposium on Measuring and Interpreting VOCs in  soils: State of the art and research
needs. January 12-14, 1993, Las Vegas, NV. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las
Vegas, NV.

Hewitt, AD.,  P. H. Miyares, D.C.  Leggett, and T.F. Jenkins.  1992.  Comparison of
analytical methods for determination of volatile organic compounds in soils. Environ.
Sci. Technol. 26:1932-1938.

Hiatt, M.H. 1981. Analysis offish and sediment for volatile priority pollutants. Anal.
Chem.  53:1541-1543.

Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water. Academic Press, Inc., New York.  288 pp.

Holtz, R.D. and W.D. Kovacs. 1981. An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering.
Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

                                       93

-------
 Howard, P.H. 1990. Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic
 Chemicals. Vols I, II, and III. Lewis Publishers, Inc.  Chelsea, MI. 574 pp. Vol I; 684
 pp. Vol II; 546 pp. Vol III.

 Jenkins, R.A., C.K Bayne, M.P. Maskarinec, L.H. Johnson, S.K Holladay, and B.A.
 Tomkins. 1993. Experimental determination of pre-analytical holding times for volatile
 organics in selected soils. Abstract from the National Symposium on Measuring and
 Interpreting VOCs in soils: State of the art and research needs. January 12-14, 1993, Las
 Vegas, NV. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.

 Jenkins, T.F. and P.W. Schumacher. 1987. Comparison of methanol and tetraglyme as
 extraction solvents for determination of volatile organics in soil. Special Report 87-22.
 US Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory.
 Hanover, NH.

 Jiang, K, and R.G. Westendorf. 1992. A comparison of sample heating techniques used
 in purge and trap gas chromatography. Abstract no. 895. Pittsburgh Conference Book of
 Abstracts. PittCon'92. March 9-12, 1992, New Orleans, LA.

 Johnson, R.L., and M. Perrott. 1991. Gasoline vapor transport through a high-water-
 content soil. J. Contaminant Hydol.  8:317-334.

 Jowise, P.P., J.D. Villnow, LI. Gorelik, and J.M. Ryding. 1987. Comparative analysis of
 soil gas sampling techniques. In, Proceeding of the National Conference on Hazardous
 Wastes and Hazardous Materials. Washington DC, U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency, Washington DC.

 Jurinak, J.J., and D.H. Vohnan. 1957. Application of Brunauer, Emmett and Teller
 equation to ethylene dibromide adsorption by soils. Soil Sci. 83:487-496.

 Jury, W.A., D. Russo, G. Streile, and H. El Abd.  1990. Evaluation of volatilization by
 organic chemicals residing below the soil surface. Water Resour. Res. 26:13-20.

 Jury, W.A., D. Russo, G. Streile, and H. El Abd. 1992. Correction to "Evaluation  of
volatilization by organic chemicals residing below the soil surface." Water Resour. Res.
 28:607-608.

Jury, WA., W.F. Spencer, and W.J. Farmer.  1983. Behavior assessment model for trace
 organics in soil: I. Model description. J. Environ. Qual. 12:558-564.

                                       94

-------
Jury, W.A., W.F. Spencer, and W.J. Farmer. 1984. Behavior assessment model for trace
organics in soil: IV. Review of experimental evidence. J. Environ. Qual. 13:580-586.

Karickhoff, S.W. 1984. Organic pollutant sorption in aquatic systems. J. Hydraulic Eng.
110:707-735.

Karickhoff, S.W., D.S. Brow and T.A. Scott. 1979. Sorption of hydrophobic pollutants
on natural sediments. Water Res. 13:241-248.

Katyal, A.K, J.J. Kaluarachchi, and J.C. Parker. 1991. MOFAT: A Two-Dimensional
Finite Element Program for Multiphase Flow and Multicomponent Transport. Program
Documentation and User's Guide. EPA/600/2-91/020. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Ada, OK

Kiang, P. H., and R.L. Grob. 1986. A headspace technique for the determination of
volatile compounds in soil.  J. Environ. Sci. Health A21:71-1OO.

King, P.H.  1993. Evaluation of sample holding times and preservation methods for
gasoline in fine-grained sand.  Abstract from the National Symposium on Measuring and
Interpreting VOCs in soils: State of the art and research needs. January 12-14, 1993, Las
Vegas, NV. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.

Kobayashi, H., and B.E. Rittmann. 1982. Microbial removal of hazardous organic
compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16: 170A-183A.

Kreamer, D.K, E.P. Weeks, and G.M. Thompson. 1988. A field technique to measure
the tortuosity and sorption-affected porosity for gaseous diffusion of materials in the
unsaturated zone with experimental results  from near Barnwell, South Carolina. Water
Resour. Res. 24:331-341.

Kuhlrneier, P.O., and G.L. Sunderland. 1985. Distribution of volatile  aromatics in deep
unsaturated sediments. In,  Proceedings of the Conference on Characterization and
Monitoring of the Vadose  (Unsaturated) Zone, November 19-21, Stapleton Plaza Hotel,
Denver, CO. National Water Well Association, Dublin,  OH.

Lappala, E. G., and G.M. Thompson. 1983.  Detection of groundwater contamination by
shallow soil gas sampling in the vadose zone. In, Proceedings of the Conference on
Characterization and Monitoring of the Vadose (Unsaturated) Zone. Dec. 8-10,  1983.
Las Vegas, NV. National Well Water Association, Dublin, OH.

                                        95

-------
Leibman, C.P., D. Dogruel, and P.P. Vandemeer. 1991. Transportable GC/ion trap mass
spectrometry for trace field analysis of organic compounds. Field Screening Methods for
Hazardous Wastes and Toxic chemicals, February 12-14, 1991, Las Vegas, NV. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.

Lesage, S., and R.E. Jackson. 1992. Practical organic analytical chemistry for hazardous
waste site investigations. In, S. Lesage and R.E. Jackson (eds.), Groundwater
Contamination and Analysis at Hazardous Waste Sites. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York
NY.545 pp.

Lesnik, B. 1993. New SW-846 methods for the analysis of conventional and non-
conventional volatile organics in solid matrices. Abstract from the National Symposium
on Measuring  and Interpreting VOCs in soils: State of the art and research needs.
January 12-14, 1993, Las Vegas, NV. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas,
NV.

Lewis, T.E., A.B. Crockett, R.L. Siegrist, and K Zarrabi. 1991. Soil sampling and analysis
for volatile organic compounds. EPA/540/4-91/001. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. 24 pp.

Lieberman, S.H., G.A. Theriault, S.S. Cooper, P.G. Malone, R.S. Olsen, and P.W. Lurk.
1991. Rapid, subsurface, in situ field screening of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination
using laser induced fluorescence over optical fibers. In Proceeding of Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Chemicals, February 12-14, 1991, Las Vegas,
NV.

Lyman, W.J., W.F. Reehl,  and D.H. Rosenblatt. 1990. Handbook of Chemical Property
Estimation Methods.  American Chemical Society. Washington DC.

Mabey, W., and T. Mill. 1978. Critical review of hydrolysis of organic compounds in
water under environmental conditions. J. Phys.  Chem Ref. Data 7:383-415.

Marks, B.J.,  D.A Selby, R.E. Hinchee,  and G. Davitt.  1989. Soil gas and groundwater
levels of benzene and toluene-Qualitative and quantitative relationships. In, Proceedings
of the Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in  Ground
Water: Prevention, Detection and Restoration.  National Water Well Association, Nov
15-17, 1989, Houston TX.
                                       96

-------
Marrin, D.L., and H.B. Kerfoot. 1988. Soil-gas surveying techniques. Envirom Sci.
Technol. 22:740-745.

Marrin, D.L., and G.M. Thompson. 1987. Gaseous behavior of TCE overlying a
contaminated aquifer. Ground Water 25:21-27.

Maskarinec, M.P., LH. Johnson, and C.K Bayne. 1989. Preparation of reference water
and soil samples for performance evaluation of volatile organic analysis. J. Assoc. Off.
Anal. Chem. 72:823-827.

Maskarinec, M.P., L.H. Johnsou and S.K Holladay.  1988. Recommendations for holding
times of environmental samples. In, Proceedings Waste Testing and Quality Assurance.
Vol  II. July  11-15, 1988. The Westin Hotel, Washington DC.

Maskarinec, M.P.,  LH. Johnson,  S.K Holladay,  R.L Moody,  C.K Bayne, and RA
Jenkins. 1990. Stability of volatile organic compounds in environmental water samples
during transport and storage. Environ.  Sci. Technol. 24:1665-1670.

Massmann, J., and D.F. Farrier. 1992. Effects of atmospheric pressures on gas transport
in the vadose zone. Water Resour. Res. 28:777-791.

Mehran, M., MJ. Nimmons, and E.B. Sirota, 1983. Delineation of underground
hydrocarbon leaks by organic vapor detection. In, Management of Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites, October 31-November 2,  1983, Washington DC,  Hazardous
Materials Control Research Institute, Silver Spring, MD.

Mendoza, CA, and E.O. Frind. 1990. Advective-dispersive transport of dense vapors in
the unsaturated zone 1. Model development. Water Resour. Res. 26:379-387.

Mendoza, CA, and T.A. McAlary. 1990. Modeling of ground-water contamination
caused by organic solvent vapors.  Ground Water 28:199-206.

Metcalfe, D. E., and G.J. Farquhar. 1987. Modeling  gas migration through unsaturated
soils from waste disposal sites. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 32:247-259.

Millington, RJ., and J.P. Quirk. 1961. Permeability of porous solids. Trans. Faraday Soc.
57:1200-1207.
                                       97

-------
Mingelgrin, U., and Z. Gerstl. 1983. Reevaluation of partitioning as a mechanism of
nonionic chemicals adsorption in soils. J. Environ. Qual. 12:1-11.

Munz, C., and P.V. Roberts. 1987. Air-water phase equilibria of volatile organic solutes.
Journal Am. Water Works Assoc.  79:62-69.

Nadeau, R.J., and F. Tomaszewicz. 1988. Influence of naturally occurring volatile
compounds on soil gas results. In, Proceedings of Field Screening Methods for
Hazardous Waste Site Investigations, October 11-13,  1988. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.

Ong, S.K, and L.W. Lion. 1991a. Mechanisms for trichloroethylene vapor sorption onto
soil minerals. J. Environ. Qual. 20:180-188.

Ong, S.K, and LW. Lion.  1991b.  Trichloroethylene vapor sorption onto soil minerals.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:1559-1568.

Pankow, J.P., and M.E. Rosen. 1988. Determination of volatile compounds in water by
purging directly to a capillary column with whole column cryotrapping. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 22:398-405.

Parker, L.V., AD. Hewitt and T.E. Jenkins. 1990. Influence of casing materials on trace-
level chemicals in well water. Ground Water Monitor. Rev. 10(Spring):146-156.

Parker, LV. 1992. Suggested guidelines for the use of PTFE, PVC,  and stainless steel in
samplers and well casings. In, Nielsen D.M. and M.N. Sara, eds., Current Practices in
Ground Water and Vadose Zone Investigations. ASTM STP 1118. American Society for
Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. 431 pp.

Parsons, F., G.B. Lage, and R. Rice. 1985. Biotransformation of chlorinated organic
solvents in  static microcosms. Environ. Toxic. Chem. 4:739-742.

Pavlostathis, S.G., and K Jaglal.  1991. Desorptive behavior of trichloroethylene in
contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25:274-279.

Pavlostathis, S.G., and G.N.  Mathavan.  1992. Resorption kinetics  of selected volatile
organic compounds from field contaminated soils. Environ.  Sci.  Technol. 26:532-538.
                                        98

-------
Pignatello, J.J. 1990a. Slowly reversible sorption of aliphatic halocarbons in soils. I.
Formation of residual fractions. Environ. Toxic. Chem. 9:1107-1115.

Pignatello, J.J. 1990b. Slowly reversible sorption of aliphatic halocarbons in soils. II.
Mechanistic aspects. Envirom Toxic. Chem. 9:1117-1126.

Finder, G.F., and LM. Abriola.  1986. On the simulation of nonaqueous phase organic
compounds in the subsurface. Water Resour. Res. 22:109S-119S.

Piwoni. M.D., and P. Banerjee. 1989. Sorption of volatile organic solvents from aqueous
solution onto subsurface solids. J. Contain. Hydrol. 4:162-179.

Plumb, R.H.  1991. The occurrence of Appendix IX organic constituents in disposal site
ground water. Ground Water Monitoring Rev. ll(Spring):157-164.

Poe, S.H., KT. Valsaraj, L.J. Thibodeaux, and C. Springer. 1988. Equilibrium vapor
phase adsorption of volatile organic chemicals on dry soils. J. Hazardous Mater. 19:17-32.

Poulsen, M.M., and B.H. Kueper. 1992. A field experiment to study the behavior of
tetrachloroethylene in unsaturated porous media. Environ.  Sci. Technol. 26:889-895.

Reisinger, H.J., D.R. Burris, LR. Cessar, and G.D. McCleary.  1987. Factors affecting the
utility of soil vapor assessment data. In, Proceedings of the First National Outdoor
Action Conference on Aquifer Restoration,  Ground Water Monitoring and Geophysical
Methods, May 18-21, 1987, Las Vegas, NV. National Water Well Association, Dublin,
OH.

Reynolds, G.W., J.T. Hoff, and R.W. Gillham. 1990. Sampling bias caused by materials
used to monitor halocarbons in groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24:135-142.

Rhue, R.D., P.S.C. Rao, and R.E. Smith. 1988. Vapor-phase adsorption of alkylbenzenes
and water on soil  and clays. Chemosphere 17:727-741.

Rosenbloom, J., P. Mock P. Lawson, J. Brown, and H.J.  Turin, in press. Site-specific soil
clean-up levels for volatile organic  compounds. Groundwater.

Roy, W.A., and R.A  Griffin. 1990. Vapor-phase interactions and diffusion of organic
solvents in the unsaturated zone. Environ. Geol. Water Sci.  15:101-110.
                                        99

-------
Rutherford, D.W., C.T. Chiou, and D.E. Kile. 1992. Influence of soil organic matter
composition on the partition of organic  compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:336-340.

Sawhney, B.L., JJ. Pignatello, and S.M. Steinberg. 1988. Determination of 1,2-
dibromoethane (EDB) in field soils: Implications for volatile organic compounds. J.
Environ. Qual. 17:149-152.

Schwarzenbach, R.P., and J. Westall. 1981. Transport of nonpolar organic compounds
from surface water to groundwater. Laboratory sorption studies. Environ. Sci. Technol.
15:1360-1367.

Shoemaker, C.A., T.B. Culver, L.W. Lion, and M.G.  Peterson. 1990. Analytical models of
impact of two-phase sorption on subsurface transport of volatile chemicals. Water
Resour. Res. 26:745-758.

Siegrist, R.L  1993. VOC measurement  in soils:  The  nature and validity of the process.
Abstract from the National  Symposium on Measuring and Interpreting VOCs in soils:
State of the art and research needs. January 12-14, 1993, Las Vegas, NV. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.

Siegrist, R.L. 1992. Volatile organic compounds in contaminated soils: The nature and
validity of the measurement process. J. Hazard. Mat.  29:3-15.

Siegrist, R.L.,  and P.D. Jenssen. 1990. Evaluation of sampling method effects on volatile
organic compound measurements in contaminated soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24:1387-
1392.

Silka, L.R. 1988. Simulation of vapor transport through the unsaturated zone-
Interpretation of soil-gas surveys. Ground Water Monitor. Rev. 8 (Spring):! 15-123.

Sims, R.C. 1990. Soil remediation techniques at  uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. A
critical review. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 40:704-732.

Slater,  J.P., F.R. McLaren, D. Christenson, and D. Dineen. 1983. Sampling and analysis
of soil for volatile organic compounds: I. Methodology Development. In, Proceedings of
the Conference on Characterization and Monitoring of the Vadose (Unsaturated) Zone.
Dec. 8-10, 1983. Las Vegas, NV. National Well Water Association, Dublin, OH.
                                       100

-------
Sleep, B.E., and J.F. Sykes. 1989. Modeling the transport of volatile organics in variably
saturated media. Water Resour. Res. 25:81-92.

Smith, J.A., C.T. Chiou, J.A. Kammer, and D.E. Kile. 1990. Effect of soil moisture on
the sorption of trichloroethene vapor to vadose-zone soil at Picatinny Arsenal, New
Jersey. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24:676-683.

Smith, L.R., and J. Dragun. 1984. Degradation of volatile chlorinated aliphatic priority
pollutants in groundwater. Environ. Int.  10:291-298.

Spencer, W.F., and M.M. Cliath. 1970.  Resorption of lindane from soil as related to
vapor density. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34:574-578.

Spittler, T. 1992. Field analysis. An interview with Dr. Thomas Spittler. Analytical
Consumer. March 1992, pp. 9-10.

Steinberg S.M. 1992. Persistence of several volatile aromatic and halogenated
hydrocarbons in a low organic carbon calcareous soil. Chemosphere 24:1301-1315.

Steinberg S.M., J.J. Pignatello, and B.L  Sawhney. 1987. Persistence of 1,2-
dibromoethane in soils: Entrapment in intraparticle micropores. Environ. Sci. Technol.
21:1201-1208.

Sulfita, J.M. 1989. Microbial ecology and pollutant biodegradation in subsurface
ecosystems. Chapter 7. In, Transport and fate of contaminants in the subsurface.  Seminar
Publication. EPA/625/4-89/019. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.

Swallow, KC. 1992. Nonpriority pollutant analysis and interpretation. In, S. Lesage and
R.E. Jackson (eds.), Groundwater Contamination and Analysis at Hazardous Waste
Sites. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.545 pp.

Taylor, S.A., and G.L Ashcroft. 1972. Physical  Edaphology. The physics of irrigated and
nonirrigated soils. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA 533 pp.

Thorstenson, D.C., and D.W. Pollock. 1989.  Gas transport in unsaturated zones:
Multicomponent systems and the  adequacy of Pick's Laws. Water Resour. Res. 25:477-
507.
                                        101

-------
 Trainor, T.M., and F.H. Laukien. 1988. Design and performance of a mobile mass
 spectrometer developed for environmental field investigations. In, Field Screening
 Methods for Hazardous Waste Site Investigations, October 11-13, 1988, Las Vegas, NV.
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV.

 Travis, C.C., and J.M. Maclnm's. 1992. Vapor extraction of organics from subsurface soils,
 Is it effective? Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:1885-1887.

 Urban, M.J., J.S. Smith, E.K Schultz, and R.K Dickinson. 1989. Volatile organic analysis
 for a soil, sediment or waste sample. In, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Waste Testing
 and Quality Assurance Symposium, July 24-28, 1989, Washington DC. U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.

 USEPA.  1982. Methods for Organic Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial
 Wastes. Test Method 624, Purgeables. EPA-600/4-82-057. U.S. Environmental Protection
 Agency, Cincinnati, OH.

 USEPA.  1986. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846. 3rd Edition. Office of
 Solid Waste and Emergency Response. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
 Washington DC.

 USEPA.  1990. Update II to SW-846. Methods Section. Office of Solid Waste. U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC.

 USEPA.  1991. Statement  of Work for Organics Analysis. USEPA Contract Laboratory
 Program. Document Number OLMO1.8, Revision 8, Augusg 1991. U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park NC.

van Ee, J.J., L.J. Blume, and T.H. Starks. 1990. A Rationale for the Assessment of
Errors in the Sampling of Soils. EPA/600/4-90/013. Office  of Research and
Development, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, NV.

Vogel, T.M., C.S. Criddle, and P.L. McCarty. 1987. Transformations of halogenated
aliphatic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21:722-736.

Voudrias, E.A., and M. Reinhard. 1986. Abiotic organic reactions at mineral surfaces. In,
Davis, J.A. and KF. Hayes, eds., Geochemical Processes at  Mineral Surfaces. American
Chemical Society, Washington, DC. pp. 462-486.
                                       102

-------
 Ward, S.E. 1991. GC/MS VOC method improvements. Environmental Lab 3:42-45.

 Weeks, E.P., D.E. Earp, and G.M. Thompson. 1982. Use of atmospheric fluorocarbons
 F-ll  and F-12 to determine the diffusion parameters of the unsaturated zone in the
 southern high plains of Texas. Water Resour. Res. 18:1365-1378.

 Wesolowski, D., and A. Alwan. 1991. Field measurement of organic compounds by gas
 chromatography. In, Simmons, M.S. ed., Hazardous Waste Measurements. Lewis
 Publishers, Chelsea, MI. 315 pp.

 Westendorf, R.G. 1992. Theory and operation of water management methods in purge
 and trap gas chromatography. Abstract no. 893. Pittsburgh Conference Book of
 Abstracts. PittCon'92. March 9-12, 1992. New Orleans, LA.

 Wilson, J.T., and J.F. McNabb. 1983. Biological transformation of organic pollutants in
 groundwater. EOS 64(33).

 Wilson, J.T., J.F. McNabb, D.L. Balkwill, and W.C. Ghiorse. 1983. Enumeration and
 characterization of bacteria indigenous to a shallow water-table aquifer. Groundwater
 21:134-142.

 Wilson, J.T., and B.H. Wilson. 1985. Biotransformation of trichloroethylene in soil.
 Applied and Environ. Microb. 49:242-243.

 Wise, M.B., G.B. Hunt C.V. Thompson, M.V. Buchanan, and M.R. Guerin. 1991.
 Screening volatile organics by direct sampling ion trap and glow discharge mass
 spectrometry. In, Field  Screening Methods for Hazardous Wastes  and Toxic Chemicals,
 February 12-14,  1991, Las Vegas, NV. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Las
 Vegas, NV.

 Yeates, G.L., and D.M. Nielsen. 1987. Design and implementation of an effective  soil gas
 monitoring program for four-dimensional monitoring of volatile organics in the
 subsurface. In Proceedings  of the NWWA Focus Conference on Ground  Water Issues,
 April 21-23, 1987, Indianapolis, IN.

 Zarrabi, K, C.K Fitzsimmons, S. Ward,  S. Butala, T.E. Lewis, J.R. Parolini, V.G.  King,
 and T.W. Nail. 1991. Investigation of sample and sample handing techniques for the
 measurement of volatile organic compounds in  soil. (In preparation for submission to
journals)

                                       103

-------
Zoeller, A., X. Zhang, and E. Overton. 1992. VOC analyses of contaminated sediments
using a field  GC system and conventional GC/MS:  How good are the results? Abstract
No. 144P. In, Pittsburgh Conference Book of Abstracts, PittCon'92. March 9-12, 1992.
New Orleans, LA.
                                        1 r,,      IU.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1993 - 750-002/80278

-------