EPA/600/R-93/153
                                               August 1993
  SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH ON DISEASES AND MORTALITIES
              OF DOLPHINS IN ILS. WATERS
                           by
                     Esther C. Peters
                     Tetra Tech, Inc.
                 10306 Eaton Place, Suite 340
                     Fairfax, VA 22030
                      Project Officer
                     William S. Fisher
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
              Environmental Research Laboratory
                   Gulf Breeze, FL  32561
                       June 1,1993
       U.S. ENVIRbNMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
CENTER FOR MARINE AND ESTUARINE DISEASE RESEARCH
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
                 GULF BREEZE, FL 32561
                                               Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
                                          DISCLAIMER

       The information in this document has  been funded wholly or in part by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) under Contract Project 68-C2-0150 to Technical Resources, Inc., Gulf Breeze, FL,
prime contractor, and Tetra Tech, Inc., of Fairfax, VA, subcontractor.  It has been subject to EPA's peer and
administrative review and approved for publication as an EPA document.

-------
                                             PREFACE

        This science literature review was prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office
of Research and Development's Center for Marine and Estuarine Disease Research as background material for
a symposium and workshop on dolphin diseases and mortalities in response to requests from Regions IV
(Atlanta, GA) and VI (Dallas, TX) following recent mortalities of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, on
the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts. This document focuses on investigations of disease and strandings in
bottlenose  dolphins and other species of small delphinids to assist in the development of guidelines and
recommendations for research on the effects of environmental stress and disease on dolphin health.
                                                 111

-------
                                      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

        Information, copies of papers or reports, contacts, and/or additional assistance with this project were
provided by Dr. Robert Bullis, Laboratory for Marine Animal Health; Dr. David Casper, Shedd Aquarium; Dr.
Romona Hacbler, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Mr. Caret Lahvis, University of Maryland; Dr. James
Mead and Mr.  Charles Potter,  National Museum of  Natural History;  Dr. George Migaki, Registry of
Comparative Pathology;  Mr. Christophe Tulou, U.S. House of Representatives Subcomittee on Economic
Stabilization of the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs; Mr.  Ted Lillestolen and Mr. Dean
Wilkinson, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service; Dr. Stephen Wise, National
Institute of Standards  and Technology;  the libraries of the Marine Mammal Commission and the National
Zoological Park; and the W.N. Kellogg Library of Marine Mammals, National Museum of Natural History.  Dr.
Hacbler; Mr. Potter; Mr. Wilkinson; Dr. Joseph Geraci,  Ontario Veterinary College; Dr. Thomas Lipscomb,
Armed  Forces  Institute  of Pathology; and Dr. Daniel  Odell, Sea World; reviewed the final draft of the
manuscript.
                                                IV

-------
                              TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface	
Acknowledgments
Summary	
Introduction	
        Historical Perspective 	
        Institutional Involvement
        Studies on Captive Dolphins
        Studies on Stranded Dolphins
        Ongoing Research Programs  ,
        Conclusions	
        Recommendations	
Acronyms  	
Literature Cited	
Appendix A - Data Collected for Strandings
Appendix B - Extended Bibliography  	
 111
 iv
vii
 1

 3
 5
 7
35
62
65
65

68
69
79
85

-------
                                      TABLES




Table 1.  Species of dolphins found in U.S. waters	  2




Table 2.  Summary of scientific research reports on diseases of captive dolphins	  8




Table 3.  Summary of scientific research reports on diseases of stranded dolphins	 37
                                          VI

-------
                                              SUMMARY

        An apparent increase in marine mammal  strandings has intensified public interest and generated
numerous theories regarding the causes of these mortalities. The passage of the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA) of 1972 (16 USC 1361-1362,1371-1384,1401-1407J) has increased the amount of research directed
toward understanding cetacean diseases and determining the causes of strandings. Several institutions have been
involved in dolphin disease studies, including public display facilities or oceanariums that maintain animals for
entertainment, education, and research; academic institutions, including veterinary medical schools and museums;
private research facilities such as certain marine laboratories; nonprofit organizations; and State and Federal
agencies. Special networks in the United States and other countries report stranding events and collect animals
for rehabilitation or study.  Despite the importance of understanding the nature and health of these organisms,
obtaining suitable animals and  tissues  for  study and  performing comprehensive investigations has been
problematic; this is primarily due to the inability to retrieve freshly-stranded animals before onset of post-mortem
deterioration.                                              j
        This report reviews the status of research on diseases and stranding mortalities of smaller members of
the family Delphinidae that are present off the United States, based on examination of 60 published reports of
dolphin  disease research,  workshop summaries, program reviews,  and conversations with  scientists and
veterinarians.   Investigations  on diseases and  causes of mortalities in captive and  stranded dolphins have
established that a variety of pathogenic  microorganisms, parasitic infestations, and nutritional disorders can
adversely affect the health of these marine mammals. The quality of studies being conducted has unproved over
the years, with greater emphasis being placed on testing specific hypotheses, • examining larger numbers  of
animals, designing studies to include control animals, and other factors. More recent studies are now examining
the bioaccumulation of toxic pollutants and naturajly occurring tokic substances to provide additional information
on the role of environmental contamination in the susceptibility of dolphins  to pathogens. Other studies address
the development and function of the immune system of dolphins  and other cetaceans. While many of the early
reports offered only limited observations, did not discuss the techniques used, and did not mention quality
assurance procedures, current investigations seek to include as many tests as possible on each animal to properly
interpret the findings of traditional gross and microscopic observations.
        However,  adequate, long-term sources of support will be required, not only for such studies, but also
for proper archiving of specimens to be used in future analyses and comparative research. New methods of data
collection, cross-referencing of multidisciplinary studies, and dissemination of research results will also facilitate
these studies. The necessity of integrating our knowledge of hazards in the marine environment with mammalian
diseases and a thorough understanding of the basic biology of
provides a general overview of the nature and success of dolphin
in this field.
the animals has also been noted. This report
disease studies to direct,future research efforts
                                                  vn

-------

-------
                                          INTRODUCTION

      • Historically, dolphins and other marine mammals found onshore, either living or dead, have brought
public attention and concern for the health of these animals. It has only been in the last two decades, however,
that the phenomenon of strandings has attracted considerable interest from a broad spectrum of scientists and
veterinarians.  With the passage of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972 (16 USC 1361-1362,
1371-1384,1401-1407), research to understand the causes of strandings has accelerated, aided by the development
of networks in the United States and other countries to report stranding events and collect the stranded animals
for  rehabilitation or study. Facilities are now operated to care for living animals, not only for public display and
education, but also for  research.  Special permission (granted by permits and/or letters of authorization under
the MMPA) is required for anyone handling a marine mammal.
        Based on early studies, Leatherwood et al. (1976) proposed two generalizations for strandings: lone
individuals usually involve an animal that is sick or injured, while mass strandings of several to several hundred
individuals may result from complex factors, including fear reactions, extremely bad weather conditions, herd-
wide disease conditions, or failure of the echolocation system due to physiological problems or environmental
conditions. A particular concern of mass strandings is that they often include apparently healthy individuals.
Several studies have been undertaken to determine the condition of stranded animals, to describe and identify
the diseases and lesions found in an attempt to understand their  role in marine mammal  strandings, and to
develop other  theories  to explain this phenomenon (Odell, 1987).  Other research has been performed on live
stranded animals maintained in captivity  as well as  animals captured for oceanariums.  Contact with marine
mammals also has led  to the discovery that certain disease agents (such as Leptospira sp., Pseudomonas sp.,
Clostridium sp., Pasturella sp., calici-viruses, Erysipefothrix rhusiopathiae) may be transferred to land mammals
and humans (Smith et al., 1978), and vice versa (Buck, 1980; Dunn et al., 1982; Wilkinson, 1991), although the
chance of this occurring appears to  be  slight (Streitfield and Chapman, 1976; Simpson and Cornell,  1983).
Despite the importance of understanding the nature and health of these organisms, it is  difficult to obtain
suitable animals and tissues  for thorough investigations.  Many of these difficulties stem from the inability to
retrieve stranded dolphins before onset of. post-mortem deterioration; others stem from the inability to use live
dolphins in studies due to then- protected status as marine mammals.
        This report reviews past research on diseases and stranding mortalities of members of the family
Delphinidae that are present off the United States.   These mammals have been placed in  the order Cetacea
(carnivorous, wholly aquatic mammals), suborder Odontoceti (toothed whales). This family includes killer whales,
pilot whales, grampus,  and various other dolphins (sometimes referred to as porpoises). Leatherwood et al.
(1976) noted that the correct usage of the terms dolphin andporpoise was controversial and confusing. Common
names of any  species may vary from locale to locale and even from individual to individual, and any small
cetacean (less  than 13 feet hi length, with or without a dorsal fin) may be known by either name. Leatherwood
et-al. (1976) reaffirmed the use of the term dolphin for members  of the family Delphinidae and porpoise for
those species in the family Phocoenidae (harbor porpoise, DalTs porpoise).  Although research has also been
conducted oh  the porpoises  and larger species of the family Delphinidae, this  report focuses on the smaller
delphinids, commonly known as dolphins. The most recent taxonomic classification of delphinids found on the
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Pacific coasts is presented in Table 1.
        All of these species  have been placed on the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Jurisdiction
Species List for Marine Mammals  and Endangered Species,  and  in Appendix II of the Convention on
International Trade in  Endangered JSpecies of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), as species that may become
threatened.  The U.S. Mid-Atlantic coastal stock of Tursiops truncotus has been identified  as a candidate for
possible addition to the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants, Endangered Species Act (ESA),
pending determination  of its  status by NMFS (NMFS, 1991a). NMFS also proposed that the U.S. Mid-Atlantic
coastal migratory stock of T. truncatus should be designated as "depleted" under the provisions of the MMPA
(NMFS, 1991b), following the 1987-1988 mass mortality.  It has been postulated that 50 percent of the estimated
population of T. truncatus was  lost during this mass mortality event (Scott and Burn,  1987; Scott et al., 1988).

-------
                         Table 1. Species of dolphins found in U.S. waters.
Scientific Name
                                                          Common Name (Occurrence')8
Order Cctacea
Family Dclphinidae
                       Delphinus delphis
                       Feresa attenuate
                       Globicephala melaena
                       Globicephala macrorhynchus
                       Grampus grisei
                       Lagenodelphis hosei
                       Lagenorhynchus acutus
                       Lagenorhynchus albirostris
                       Lagenorhynchus obliquidens
                       Lissodelphis borealis
                       Orcinus area
                       Peponocephala electra
                       Pseudorca crassidens
                       Stenetta attenuata
                       Stenella cfymene
                       Stenella coeruleoalba
                       Stenella frontalis (= plagiodorif
                       Stenella longirostris
                       Steno bredanensis
                       Tursiops truncates0
saddleback or common dolphin (A,G,P)
pygmy killer whale (A,G,P)
long-finned pilot whale (A,P)
short-finned pilot whale (A,G,P)
grampus or Risso's dolphin (A,G,P)
Eraser's dolphin (A,G,P)
Atlantic white-sided dolphin (AJ
white-beaked dolphin (A)
Pacific white-sided dolphin (P)
northern right whale dolphin (P)
killer whale (A,G,P)
melon-headed whale (A,G,P)
false killer whale (A,G,P)
pantropical spotted dolphin (A,G,P)
short-snouted spinner dolphin (A,G,P)
striped dolphin (A,G,P)
Atlantic spotted dolphin (A,G)
long-snouted spinner dolphin (A,G,P)
rough toothed dolphin (A,G,P)
bottlenose dolphin (A,G,P)
« A = Atlantic, G = Gulf of Mexico, P = Pacific. Based on combined pelagic and coastal information
 from Lea&eTwood et al. (1976,19^8); Tucker and Associates, Inc. J19&): ¥ottei(1991}: CW. Potter
 National Museum of Natural History, personal communication; K.D. Muflin, National Marine Fisheries
 Service, Pascagoula, Mississippi, personal communication.
b Perrin et al. (1987.)
e Pacific bottlenose  dolphins were referred to as T. gilli in some earlier papers reviewed for this report.

-------
        Populations of dolphins found in U.S.  waters vary in size depending on geographic location and
migratory patterns.  In addition to coastal migratory populations, T, truncates also occurs in smaller groups
having limited ranges  (e.g., Sarasota Bay and Indian River Lagoon)  and in pelagic populations.  Stenella
attenuata, S. clymene, and S. coeruleoalba are common in pelagic waters of the Gulf of Mexico, but may rarely
stray into coastal areas or he washed ashore.  Species of dolphins most commonly found stranded, and therefore
more available for research, include T. truncatus, Delphinus delphis, and Lagenorhynchus acutus (Wilkinson,
1991). Diseases of these species have received much attention because these dolphins, particularly T. truncatus,
are popular in oceanarium exhibits, where considerable efforts have been expended to understand their natural
history, physiology, and behavior to maintain the animals in good health.
        The published  literature including peer-reviewed articles, "gray literature, government reports, etc.
concerning diseases and mortalities of dolphins hi U.S. waters was examined for this review. Brief summaries
of the institutions and agencies involved in dolphin disease research and the changes that have occurred in the
conduct of this research during the last 20 years are presented in the sections that follow.  The validity  of
representative diagnostic studies on both captive and stranded dolphins is evaluated in the context of hypotheses
presented, numbers of observations, methqdologies, quality assurance procedures, and other factors.  Dolphin
diseases and parasites  have been reviewed in Sweeney and Ridgway (1975), Howard (1983a), Dailey (1985),
Geraci and St. Aubin (1987), Dierauf (1990), Smith and Boyt (1990), and Haebler and Moeller (1993), and these
reports will not be described in detail in this report. Information on current dolphin disease research programs
and the provisions of the Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Act (Tide HI, Oceans Act of 1992)
are presented in the last section. A list of acronyms appears at die end of the text. Appendix A lists die types
of data collected from  stranded animals.  Papers referred to  in die text of tiiis report are included hi die
Literature Cited, and  other papers related to  disease research on cetaceans  are listed  in die Extended
Bibliography (Appendix B). Additional citations on cetacean diseases, clinical techniques, and clinical research
results may be found in Dierauf (1990). This report provides a general overview of the nature and success  of
dolphin disease studies to guide future research efforts in this field.
                                     HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
        As in other fields of scientific research, die focus and breadth of dolphin disease research have changed
over the last few decades and improvements have been made hi die techniques used in such research.  While
early studies were limited to identification of pathogens and parasites present hi the tissues of the animals, more
recent studies have built on the accumulating knowledge of physiology and behavior to examine die roles of
nutritional disorders, chemical contaminants, and genetics hi the development of various disease states.  The
earliest studies were conducted on captive animals to discover appropriate methods and techniques for treating
diseases and maintaining health hi captivity.  Later, veterinarians and scientists began to examine wild-caught
or live-stranded animals prior to transfer to oceanarium facilities.  Finally, studies were conducted on dead-
stranded animals to try to determine the cause of deatii.
        Ahhough dolphins were reportedly captured and transported to die New York Aquarium on Coney
Island in the late 1800s (C.W. Potter, National Museum of Natural History, personal communication, 1992), die
first captive dolphin community was established at St. Augustine, Florida, hi die late 1930s  (Pryor and Norris,
1991) at Marine Studios,  a facility which later  became Marineland, Florida.  Originally a movie  studio,
Marineland was designed to train and film marine mammals for public entertainment.  Additional oceanariums
were built by public and private interests,  including Marineland (hi California) and Sea World (California,
Florida, Texas, Ohio),  and  by a number of zoological parks around the country such as the Philadelphia Zoo,
die Shedd Aquarium,  the  National Aquarium hi Baltimore,  Mystic Marinelife Park, and the New England
Aquarium.  It is beyond the scope of this report to provide a complete list of the numerous facilities, varying hi
size from single-animal to multispecies assemblages, that have housed captive dolphins over the years.  A copy
of the database on facilities which currently maintain captive marine mammals is available upon request from
the Chief of the Permits Division, National Marine Fisheries Service/Office of Protected Resources, 1335 East-

-------
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, (301) 713-2289. Additionally, Federal, State, and local government
agencies have been involved in maintaining cetaceans in captivity for research and educational purposes, such
as the U.S. Navy department that has conducted extensive studies of marine mammals at naval centers in Point
Mugu and San Diego, California, and Kanehoe, Oahu, Hawaii.   Studies of the clinical biology of marine
mammals began when veterinarians were brought into captive dolphin facilities to diagnose disease conditions.
Later, veterinarians became affiliated with these facilities on either a temporary or permanent basis to provide
continuous health monitoring and direct the care of the animals while scientists from a variety of disciplines
performed research on life history, physiology, and behavior in captivity.
        While knowledge of marine mammal biology and pathology was building from studies on captive
animals, scientists and veterinarians began investigations of the presence of diseases and parasites in stranded
animals.  Informal networks consisting of State or local  law enforcement  and wildlife agencies, academic
institutions, and aquariums responded to stranding events. For example, the Los Angeles County Museum and
the Smithsonian Institution began to systematically record strandings of marine mammals found on local beaches
in the early 1960s (Wilkinson, 1991) and archived materials obtained from these animals.  With the passage of
the MMPA hi 1972, a stranding network project to investigate naturally-occurring strandings was started by Dr.
James Mead at the Smithsonian Institution with the  cooperation of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS),
the National Park Service, and the U.S. Coast Guard. This network was extended to include the entire United
States in 1973. Originally developed to examine "short-lived phenomena," the Scientific Event and Alert Network
(SEAN) was divided  into two sections in 1977; one section was dedicated to studies of current volcanic activity,
and the other became the Marine Mammal Events Program (MMEP) to cover cetaceans, pinnipeds, and sea
turtles, (the latter two groups of marine animals  are not presently monitored).  Skeletons, frozen tissues, and
tissue samples fixed  and preserved in ethanol from over 2000 cetaceans have  been archived at the National
Museum of Natural History (NMNH) for research.  These materials were recovered primarily from stranded
animals on the U.S. Atlantic coast, from incidental by-catches from tuna and other fisheries and from collections
made during research whaling trips.
        A workshop on marine mammal strandings  held by the Marine Mammal Commission (MMC) in the
late 1970s recommended that regional coordinators be designated to facilitate the reporting of stranding incidents
and data collection (Geraci and St. Aubin, 1979a)  . The workshop also established a plan of action for handling,
nursing, and  rehabilitating live-stranded animals, and provided information on  the operation of the, network,
establishing lines of communication between law enforcement agencies and the scientific community to minimize
potential conflicts.  Regional networks, organized by  the Department of Commerce, were designated at each of
the four regional offices of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).  NMFS  issues two types of letters
to regional stranding network member institutions and individuals who have received approval to handle either
protected marine mammals that have been stranded or permanent maintenance of rehabilitated stranded animals
(known as Letters of Authorization and Letters of Agreement, respectively). The Regional Stranding Networks
are operated by volunteers.
        Upon report of a stranding, a representative of the Regional Stranding Network goes to the site, collects
required information on the basic life history and morphology of the animal(s) (an example of the report form
is provided in Appendix A), and may pick up the  carcass for delivery to an appropriate institution or individual
for archiving or study.  Quarterly reports  for the MMEP list  occurrences  by species according to type of
observation, such as  "capture," "incidental catch,"  "incidental catch?," "sightings"  (unusual or significant records
of live animals where there is no beach stranding  or incidental catch), "strandings" (any dead animal, floating or
on the beach, where there is no indication of incidental catch), and "strandings?".  The reports are available from
the Regional Stranding Coordinators.  The MMEP database is available for individual data  requests.  This
database currently contains information on cetaceans and other marine mammals from all major North American
collections, and the MMEP is in the process  of adding other non-U.S. collections to assist researchers (C.W.
Potter, personal communication, 1991).  The Regional Stranding Networks also maintain information on marine
mammals involved in strandings.  Most information maintained by the stranding networks is limited, but records
are kept of tissues collected; other materials that were generated such as report forms, photos, and studies
performed; the individuals who obtained materials for study; and the locations  of archived specimens.  ." " ~f
these materials are given a common accession number that is assigned to each individual animal at the ti
 All of
time of

-------
 collection. Active exchange programs are maintained with other government and nongovernment institutions
 and researchers.       '
        The Second Marine Mammal Stranding Workshop (Reynolds and Odell, 1991) reviewed the operation
 of the Regional Stranding Networks and proposed goals and research to enhance the value and quality of the
 data collected on stranded animals.  In particular the workshop attempted to:  (1) ensure the standard and
 accurate collection of Level A data (Heyning, 1991) and, where possible, Level B and C data (see Appendix A
 for lists of data to be collected at each level and a copy of the latest Marine Mammal Stranding Report  form
 for Level A data) and (2) to maintain an accurate record of any changes in systems or procedures for reporting
 strandings, and the  means and frequency of responding to  such reports, to enable continued meaningful
 interpretation of the data over time. A discussion of the differences between the Regional Stranding Networks,
 a review of stranding issues under the MMPA and ESA (such as disposition and transfer of materials collected
 from a stranded animal), and recommendations for improving the operation of the networks and the value of
 studies performed on these organisms are included in Wilkinson (1991).
                                  INSTITUTIONAL INVOLVEMENT
        The development of the Regional Stranding Networks provided additional opportunities for identifying
who studies marine mammal diseases and the facilities and agencies that support such research.  Several
institutions have been involved in disease studies, including public display facilities or oceanariums, academic
institutions including veterinary medical schools and museums, private research facilities such as certain marine
laboratories, and nonprofit organizations (for example, Dolphin Biology Research Associates), as well as State
and Federal agencies. Each type of institution offers different opportunities for funding, from staff support for
diagnostic services at the clinical level to grants limited to specific research projects. Training of veterinarians
and scientists has also changed over the years. Marine mammal pathobiologists were initially recruited from
veterinary schools or zoology departments and had a solid background in terrestrial mammalian physiology and
diseases that could be applied to aquatic mammals. As more facilities were established to keep these animals
in captivity, more specialized training programs were  developed, combining specific courses with practical
internships to provide a more effective education in this field.  A few unique programs are discussed in this
section. A complete list all of the schools and facilities that are involved in dolphin disease research has not been
prepared.
        The first formal program of disease research, the Marine Mammal Disease Surveillance Program, was
founded in 1969. This program was a collaborative project of the Comparative Medical and Veterinary Services
Division of the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, the Los Angeles County Department of
Animal Care and Control, the Los Angeles County Department of Beaches, the Los Angeles County Museum,
and Marineland of the Pacific at Palos Verdes, CA.  It was organized by Dr. Robert J. Schroeder, Los Angeles
County Veterinarian and Deputy Director of the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, under
delegated authority from the State of California Department  of Fish and Game and the U.S. Department of
Commerce (Schroeder et al., 1973; Howard, 1983).  Marine mammals  found stranded along the southern
California coast were collected, examined, and materials archived for future study. Each case was identified by
a field number, providing a  cross-reference for the different investigations. Many of the cases obtained under
the auspices of this program were reviewed in the book, Pathobiology of Marine Mammal Diseases  (Howard
1983).
        The International Association of Aquatic Animal Medicine (lAAAM) is a professional organization
composed of veterinarians and scientists interested in disease  research on  aquatic organisms, including marine
mammals.  In addition to offering a forum for the exchange of research reports and educational activities,
IAAAM maintains a tissue registry to match investigators who need specific tissues for research on normal and
diseased aspects of morphology, physiology, neurology, etc.  with those investigators who have archived marine
mammal tissues. IAAAM also provides a representative to the Alliance of Marine Parks and Aquariums.  The
Alliance, which began in 1985 as the Marine Mammal Interest Group (MMIG), is an organization of marine

-------
mammal public display and research facilities.  Semiannual meetings are held by management personnel to
provide input to public and private institutions and government organizations on marine mammal issues.
        An additional resource for comparative studies of marine  mammal diseases is  the  collection of
comparative and  veterinary pathology specimens and materials archived by the  Department of Veterinary
Pathology of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) hi Washington, DC.  Qualified investigators may
examine literature and cases for study and confer with the staff on disease research problems.  The AFIP also
offers  courses  on various aspects of  comparative pathology.   For example, "Comparative Pathology of
Environmental  Pollutants" (Summer 1991) and  "The Comparative Pathobiology of Environmental Disasters"
(Spring 1993) included discussions on aquatic animals. The availability of archived specimens from this and other
facilities offers outstanding opportunities for the education and training of marine mammal pathobiologjsts, as
well as supporting long-term comparative studies.
        Federal organizations involved in dolphin disease research include NMFS, FWS, the National Animal
Disease Laboratory (Ames, Iowa), MMC, and EPA. These agencies not only support in-house research projects
but  also provide grants to individuals  for additional  and/or, collaborative studies.   The MMC  oversees
management of the MMPA.  Three commissioners are appointed by the President subject to confirmation by
the senate, and overseen by Congress, with a rotating board of nine scientific  advisors. By law the MMC must
heed the advice of its Scientific Advisory Board.  NMFS, FWS, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture's
(USDA) Animal and  Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) reached an agreement to sort out the relative
responsibilities and authorities granted under the MMPA and the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). USDA/APHIS
is primarily responsible for annuals held in captivity; NMFS and FWS coordinate stranding activities (see Jenkins,
1990).
        NMFS's Office of Protected Resources (OPR) initiated the Stranding Network Program in 1989 to
upgrade the operation and  increase support  of the Regional Stranding Networks  and to  provide  training,
equipment, and consistent protocols to improve the  data gathered from stranded animals.  Also in that year,
NMFS/OPR began the National Marine Mammal Tissue Bank (NMMTB) to regularly collect and store selected
marine mammal tissues, under the auspices of the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), for
study by multidisciplinary groups.  (More information on the tissue bank is provided  in the section entitled
"Ongoing Research Programs" in this report.) The Stranding Network Program was individually identified hi the
President's budget request  in 1991 (D.M. Wilkinson, NOAA, Office  of Protected Resources,  personal
communication, 1993). NMFS's Southwest Fisheries Center in La Jolla, California, maintains a large collection
of frozen and fixed tissues (hi particular ovaries, testes,  and fetuses) and teeth from dolphins hi the eastern
tropical Pacific. These specimens were obtained by tuna vessels using purse  seining for tuna over a period of
two decades (Pryor and Norris, 1^91). Skulls and skeletons collected from these dolphins have been transferred
to the Smithsonian Institution's marine mammal collection.  Tissues from  the Southwest  Fisheries Center
collection are also available to investigators.
        Federal funding has been available for marine mammal disease research. An average of $100,000 per
year since 1986 has been awarded through the MMC for all aspects of research on marine mammals, usually as
transfers of funds to other Federal agencies, primarily the NMFS, FWS, and Minerals Management Service
(MMS). Additional funds have been provided by these and other agencies (e.g., Office of Naval Research) and
organizations.  The MMC publishes an annual report entitled Survey of Federally-Funded  Marine Mammal
Research and Studies, based  on information requested from 20 Federal  agencies, departments,  and offices,
concerning projects undertaken during the year and planned for the next fiscal year. The last published report
(Waring, 1992)  is  available from the National Technical Information Service.
        The MMC has provided support for a few studies on diseases (e.g., Geraci et al., 1978b; Geraci, 1989;
Deiter, 1991), as well  as workshops on issues of concern hi marine mammal  disease  research (Geraci and St.
Aubin, 1979b).  Most recently, Drs. DJ. St. Aubin and JJl. Geraci convened the  "Workshop on the Rescue,
Rehabilitation, and Release of Sick and Injured  Marine Mammals" December 3-5, 1991, in Chicago.  Experts
in relevant scientific disciplines and representatives of groups involved hi rescue and rehabilitation programs
reviewed available information and recommended actions that should be taken to stop potentially dangerous and
inhumane practices, and resolve uncertainties concerning the rescue,  rehabilitation, and release  of stranded
marine mammals. A problem that has become apparent under the latest provisions  of the MMPA is that

-------
animals could  be exposed  to  exotic diseases while recovering  in captivity,  and such  pathogens could be
transmitted to wild populations when the animals were later released.  Funds for this workshop were provided
by transfer from NMFS.


                                  STUDIES ON CAPTIVE DOLPHINS


        The earliest published reports of diseases in dolphins were based on studies of animals that had been
captured and held in captivity for varying periods of time.  Studies ranged from case reports on dead animals
to clinical monitoring and  health maintenance activities.   Types of diseases, stress factors, and  causes of
mortalities varied widely. Whereas early studies were based on dolphins purposely collected for captivity, more
recent observations have been made on dolphins from live-stranding events  that were  kept in captivity for
rehabilitation. Thirty-four reports on diseases found in captive dolphins, from 1956 to 1988, were examined for
this review. Information on the study material, techniques used, data presented, and diagnoses for each of these
reports is presented in Table 2.  Only the species names for the dolphins examined in each report are listed, but
common names of other annuals mentioned are also given.
        Most of the reports reviewed here are case histories for one or a few  dolphins that were observed to
have similar diseases. Woodard et al. (1969) included findings from over 24 Tursiops truncatus in his report on
parasites  from  captive dolphins.  The level of detail given in the 24  case histories varied.  For instance, no
information was available on two dolphins whose necropsy specimens had been  sent to the AFIP (Migaki et al.,
1971b), and no information was given on two dolphins whose tattoo lesions were biopsied during antibody studies
(Smith et al., 1983b). In another report, Geraci et al. (1966) presented  thorough records of animals in captivity.
The case  histories were brief, but presented essential notes on date and location of capture, transportation to
the facility, feeding and behavior, diseases diagnosed and treatments given, period of captivity, and observations
at time of death.  Other reports noted the gender of the animal(s), but some did not. Animals that had died
while in captivity were the focus of the earlier reports (e.g., Seibold and Neal, 1956; Geraci et al., 1966), while
some later studies dealt with clinical findings or biopsy results (e.g., Buck, 1980; Smith et al., 1983a, 1983b).
        Information on the techniques used to study the diseases in each report ranged from sparse to extensive.
It is often not clear whether necropsies were  complete or partial. Lesions found in different organs might be
described, but statements that  could characterize other tissues as normal  were lacking.  The authors often
neglected to provide basic information on the histopathological techniques used. While most reports noted the
type of fixative and whether the tissues had been previously frozen, others did not (e.g., Seibold and Neal, 1956;
Migaki, 1978c). Most did not provide any details on the solutions used to process the tissue samples, although
many indicated the thickness of the paraffin sections examined. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and special stains
for  bacteria or  fungi were usually noted.  More recent microbiological studies (i.e., Buck and Spotte,  1986a,
1986b; Buck et  al., 1987,1988) provided the most information on methods and applied more varied techniques
to improve the quality of the isolation and  characterization of the  bacteria found, in contrast to  earlier
reports such as those of Brown.et al. (1960) and Medway and Schryver (1973). These advanced techniques were
based on  current  knowledge of microorganisms found in the marine environment and those found hi marine
mammals. While the results of early studies have not been disproved, it is probable that more microorganisms
may have been present in the animals but were not culturable under the conditions employed.
        Descriptions and illustrations of gross and microscopic lesions found were usually satisfactory.  Again,
the  level of detail varied with each report, but for those where individual case histories were presented, lesions
were usually described in detail for each animal.   Discussions of the  findings  were often brief in the earlier
studies, with more extensive synthesis of information and results of other studies presented in later reports.  For
example, Brown et al. (1960) simply presented cases from the first 5 years of operation of Marineland  of the
Pacific, while Buck  and Spotte (1986a, 1986b) gave limitations of  then-  studies and proposed  additional
hypotheses for future research.
        Conclusions appeared appropriate and adequate for each study, but the significance of the findings could
have been enhanced if additional studies had been conducted or more details on the techniques used had been

-------


1
4
o
CO
1
s
"o
-B
ca
2
O
|
Number of
o
CO
| .§
"S ^
<, CO*
§
•s" 13 1
E £* « JS
'.S3 .. 3 (? 2 O *O
8*1 s s HJ s
- f 2 I -3 -3 *
•811 I^I1
lit llf^l
1 gi || 1-2-1^
o cs *£ w »S B »2 jo id



•B.O^-SS f §| o
i-ilil^i in I
"8 11- | |l-3-|.lll I
S«MP*HoB§*c § ct< gs
O O*5 CQCS w R cj .S cau CM (•
° ' -0 a
88 1 -
plplL
'• S '3 b S "! S
i ^ 6 S) J o .|
iO .0 UrC2clKRI
2 g-offi-o-o-oOto ca Et>£>
I
Si
I
S
o
•o
•c £»
2 :s
i "8 ts.
is15- J
*^ c ^ O
1 -ll 1





3 § 1
1 1, ?
B -S e
K % 1
C*i »-« W
"3
^
i
13
•o
1 «
.S! o*
t/i r-<


8

-------
                                                                                                          I
                                                                                                          •8
                                                                                                          S
                                                                                                          §
                                                                                                          •8

                                                                                                          4>
                                                                                                          73
 u

1
                               •a

                               1
                                                                                          CD    3

-------
                                                                 10
                  .S
   S •§ a | a !jj |> 83-§'!•!''§.!
   llllilfililfl
   *£ f**< *o o 13 *o co *3 «o £^ ^^ 


          fl;
        •"  --=?n3!?n'5a'D
        Sl^S S1 2 I g

            g « "g S .s 1
            cs S .2 •§ S "a
            o £ 3 S .8 .S
o
•a
   •S » •§ 3 8 « S
•811
's ""-••§
o

cS
    O

-------
I
u
I
H
           a
          CO
          I
          3
I
&
          o
          1
        *f
      
-------
I
cf
o
ents
           OT
      *s

      If-s
       POO
           8
                         ..

                    3^ i - s|
                        is  a
                        •
               I


               f s
               G 3 a
                .0
               .2
 ||
    g
   •
c c o
o P. e
                  t
                  °-  °
                      c 8 8
                 8 £ S S -° 3
                 § s « .a g -3
                 c p« C *O C- u
               5 •§. s si.
               "p


a
                                                                                   12
                                           •°.2
                                           .£8
_ "2 5 T3 o c
•=a * o -a s>
p o 'EX B «
o c o > -
to -s •— 'Eh'

                                      113
                                          B

                                          •I
                                        55 "o
                                        S o
                                        * •&

-------
            £

            <5
           a
           co
crobiolo
1
•9
c^f
o
s
£
           2
           o

  I
  o
*i

                                                                                        13
                                |   -S
                              *O C   3

                                11"
                                             §1   1
                               §
                                            s s s
                                             o
                          2.9
                          i-a
                                            o
                                           •§
                                           ft,
                                     00 hn
                                o  S
                                0  '5.

-------
H
a
of
      I
      •3

      I
4_*

S
      O
    a
    Hi
    z'll

       a

       PS
    03
    O
    js

    i
    S2
    o
    -is
    §•1

    il
    s|
    s §
   .2
  o 8
vs H. .S S

Mil

*5!is
•5| 8 ||
3 U g o E
                                                 14
                    *S O
              e
             S'l
            8.2
        I|ll.:
        o C -o c "

        5111
    c

    T>
        O
 a .5 o •S
 E'H o o
         -"  1«1

         Hal
         Ulh
        I
        5
               1
    Hs^l^ii
 S°Sfl:3-2§5
-------
15

-------
GO
K)
§•
o
"8
is
U
 c/3
   H I

   1 2
   ag"   "5 1

   HA ill
   P. 0 3 tS -0 S
     33S!
     B §  £ „
     e'S- S-a
-2-2 w-^-g
'Si 5. 2 -2
 .-§1:-
 isi"
^ "S "-C Wl
2 p ^ "5
ill!
•S u a a
    E-'
    o-
     .
     ?,
                                                        16

-------
          3

           o.
          V)
•9
of
o

s
           §•
          .a
          ffi
          I
      11
                                                                                    17
°- s s  s
3- 8 -a 8
                                                            as

                                                            "

-------
8

6
I
        1
                                                                     18
   11  I
   S-S  -§
                5$ O*
                OS On
                i/a to
                w g
            zr c;
               S >, § £ «
                -R 5 a


               :f

                t
                1

-------
         1

         a

         I
        C/3
i
of
I
"os
.
ffl
         I
         o


        •1

        t&




        I

        £
                                                                  19

        s   Iif*iif!I

-------
I
           1

           g  G -o
           *" -r «5« *o o
           *  -8 8 -g,

           tills
opathol


        0
     il
a. a u •o a .3
    a
          t-:
           a
           o
           2
        o
             2Ov
             T-l
                           S
                           §,
              111

              Si  I
              II  1
                          1  I
                          rs  &
              •S ra
                         UJi!
                           •2 -S g 1
3 e'o «
                           a - s
                           1 1 o 1
                          £  1 g;
                          •I  •»* g
                          Illl
                          20 a 1
                            -
              Q  S
                                                             20

-------
•a

I

I
cf
•s






.gnosis/Comments
CO
Q
i















"3
j
a
o
1
CQ

§*
S



wa
8
0
!
O


"3
1
Q
P
^







i«r
s
OQ
"d •§
•H fli
EJ H^
<, t/3


JJ
a
2
JD
**M



1
.2
S3
J
4J
j-. C
F discussion of differen
s of poxvirus in differe
mammals
•s M
.0 £-J3
electron
microscopy,
details given in
citation, lesions


"supportable evidence'
K
in
briefly described,
inclusions
V) 4)

s 1 lliix
C £ £ => .C CX o Q
J 11 11 111!
1 s
'§ '1





S3
1

S3
•n
0
1
(4-1
.1






«
•3
o
a
•0
g

E
c
•si
•85
£j >=L
•§ s
S,.2




•I

c
s 4
1 i
S 1
-fe g
K s






1




















































omyelitis of flipper, du
yuries and infection
Is
radiography of
amputated
1
•o S
culture ar
characteri
e
g
f
g
e
.-a
•o
1
•o
^•g"
jfi p
2 O
_8 &

fc*
2
1
CM G
o 5>
•2-1


ugh skin wound
1


d need for meticulous
o
B
flipper at
necropsy
revealed
tf
1,8
•>-> ?
details no
Pseudomc









e
' S
™
S





I
1




















and vigilance during
2
S
extensive bone
f
e
cs




















•e
a
to

fragmentation,
lysis, and
<3 £;
3 3
fa
« §
,Q t4-(






















osteomyelitis
I
1-1
« a
u_ U
0 G


















•b
TH
| g

-------
CO
crobiol
topa
0

eferen



        t
   -      -     °    -
        .
     c
     'S
     ^»

             « '
e 8 § g

1 ill
12



     1  -I"


                   -i"  °
             i

                  l
               w .S ta
    •c
    2
    o
    o
                                                               22

-------
"
a
•S
H
                                                                        23
         8
         O
            ~ s
            § s°°
    !
              -o
            •*-> W
               CO C
               u c
  
-------
crobiology
Histopathology
   O

<**
Reference
                                               24
                  -^H
                llllfii
.-3 S g g
2-§ w 8
« «£ S,
            S

            Ui
     ii
          i
    rt
    8
      c
      B 5 §
      6 0-2
     0

     g
     =
     Q

-------
        I
         b
I

o
M
X
         2
         O


         i
         53
        13
             I
            '«i>
            lie
            1 .1 ^
                                                                   25
   u
   J3

-------
                                                     26
I
ents
Diagnosis/Co


                  a  a  g s a
               Sill  III if

       p
       1
       e3

       O

          S o
        &

          K ;,
          o 3
          r* a
          1'

-------
I
of
I




Sfl
U
o
S
I
o
I§
: 1
wa
to
I
u
'S
S
JO
z
I
5S
S -3
3*
8
.0
i * •••'•
i ,i - .- '•'-
•s It "• .
§ • If- .
1 ••'8:'!
y M u o
S* "^ 'tS S
.If III'
.3 J3 S .3 to

If
" tJ 3 _
5 o S<2_
SI-SI
§ 3l §
s 1 i 1 1
S -o g g .a-
J2 g w 2 a" M
3 .1 a' 8 8 «
«> s a S "3, 2
*O W5 co <*-« « C
a-"8
P o
o *C
u S
c &
Is? * s^'i-^
•5 olcj « p^ 45 w *O O 0*0*0
^ 8
* i-

ti
                                                                                                 27

-------
                                                             28
           151
"8
a

•3
&
cu

1
33
           111 •
           .§ V to ._r
                  •JJ
              •s is_

             alSSJU

             Hall I

-------
                                                           29
        s
        s

        4
        ^3"
        8
               "2 n    -a -   . o>
               a -a  v c "O ia  Hg


               lh I ill ill
                           §
     •g
 -- -s  f
 «f § £ S 2 -H '

i|lll|}:

>» ra o 3 E 3 x:
"8

I


1
of
u


1
   1
   •s

   I
   ffl
            8,-8 3
•8
      s
       I
        I
      I

      a
      •g

-------
                                                                                                           30
             •a
              co
             I§
a
c-T
I
              "o
              I
              •3
              o
               o
              PS
                              •&
                              n
                              I
                   .§•8.1
                                 •a
                        fi    3
                        ^    a
                        -4.   -4
                        N    •*
a
•&

-------
          OH
          C/3
I

I

of
o
         1
         1
                                                                           31
                           I4=
  •-l»flltls
  •3 S S.3 s •"
£1


                   J7 M*~fiOVO W9 CA PnV3 C "

                                             CO Ji
               .R-o  5
               £P 9J  -S
             •o .s i  ?
              §=5 C T3 >,
             __ s 3 g g g  -a

             ^ — w ? e "S « '§ *§
              .2 S S e -a
                                     t!
   Lsllll

-------
a
c-f
                                                                                    32
                  «= 2
                                •Sue
                               £3 £ e o

                               I -i 11
D
                            i

                         if

                         Is
                         V&<

                               corao
          00
«  i
b
t

w
                          *

                          1; v, S1
                                        1

                                  iS«3a.-2Sa I  J<
            o I  S
           o:   i§

-------
                VJ>

                *
                I
                o
•s
(N

 U




1
 I
a
                                                                                                                             33
                           1 a .S  g s  ^.s e/5 ±:   S  I § ^ a 8 I S
                           .S &.•*  oa-o.S'o HI'S  4>S
                           •I

-------
                                                                                                  34

presented in some of the reports.  Animals were  not clearly identified as individual specimens such (hat
additional studies on archived material could be cross-referenced in the literature   Woodard et al  (1969)
identified protozoan and metazoan parasites from over 24 bottlenose dolphins, but did not state whether any
other studies on physiology or microbiology had been performed or how their, captivity may have influenced the
parasite loads.  Buck and Spotte (1986b) and Buck et al. (1988) noted that necropsies had been performed on
the dead animals, but they  did not include details  on lesions found, if any, and restricted their reports to
microbiological findings.                   '                                           .
        Studies on diseases  of captive dolphins and  other marine mammals have increased in recent years as
more veterinarians and scientists have been hired by facilities to perform regular physical examinations and
routine diagnostic procedures, and to experiment with treatments ranging from diet to drug therapies. Current
regulations on maintaining marine mammals in captivity are enforced by the USDA/APHIS. These regulations
arc currently under review by NMFS, MMC, USDA/APHIS, various theme park personnel, and a panel of
marine mammal researchers in order to improve conditions.  For example, present regu ations are vague or
ambiguous for water quality standards (e.g., bacterial levels "that would not cause harm or discomfort to marine
mammals"), quality and quantity of food, "sufficient" companionship, and other conditions (Abate, 1991).
         Simpson and Cornell  (1983)  reviewed  diseases associated with  stranding and captivity in  marine
mammals and noted that capture of marine mammals often led to neurogenic or capture shock. This shock, on
top of pre-existing disease or trauma (skin lesions or dermal dehydration unless special carriers are used), may
result in gradual deterioration with associated stress myopathy (lactic acid accumulation in muscles, pH changes,
and acute hemorrhagic muscle bundle necrosis), followed by death, within 1 to 2 weeks after transfer to the
holding  facility.  More immediate deaths have been the  result of parasitic diseases.  As in other organisms,
however, little is known as to  whether organisms classified as parasites are truly detrimental to the(host. or
whether they may have a mutualistic or commensalistic relationship with the host (Simpson and Cornell 1983).
Despite the fact that cetaceans  have an active humoral immune response (IgG, IgM, and IgA immunoglobuhns
have been found in these animals), parasites are considered to be potential pathogens in captive cetaceans and
are treated as such, using a variety of chemicals.  Dosages must be determined experimentally since toxicity trials
on statistically significant numbers of cetaceans cannot be performed. Knowledge of appropriate water quality
has improved over the years, often derived from early accidental experiments. For example, cetaceans require
salinities above 10 ppt or else irregular necrosis and severe ulceration of the epidermis can occur (Simpson and
Cornell, 1983). While this ulceration may not occur for over a week, the lesions are irreversible after 3 weeks.
Skin lesions associated with capture can heal when  the animal is kept in clean water.                    ^
         Several  of the most recent published reports by J.D. Buck and  colleagues  (1987, 1988, 1991) have
 focused on  microbiological findings from captive dolphins.  Simpson  and  Cornell (1983) noted that mixed
 bacterial cultures were often found at necropsy, so  the exact etiology of diseases such as pneumonia and skin
 lesions were difficult to determine.  Early studies reported microorganisms that were typically isolated from
 humans and other mammals.   Buck and Spotte (1986b) identified three species of marine vibrios in both
 apparently healthy and stranded animals as part of  the normal commensal microflora of wild cetaceans. They
 noted that more extensive microbiological studies should be performed during routine physical examinations and
 at necropsies to determine the role of these vibrios in marine mammal diseases.  They also suggested, however,
 that the recovery of only these three "estuarine-type" vibrios might be an artifact due  to the limitations of the
 API 20E identification system. Fujioka et al. (1988) discussed the problems of culturing and identifying species
 of Vibrio bacteria that may  infect wounds in dolphins. While commercially prepared bacterial identification kits
 such as the API 20E system are useful for analyzing human clinical samples, they are of limited value for many
 environmental species of Vibrio (as from the marine environment).  Fujioka et al. (1988) described expanded
 biochemical identification methods.  Vibrio damsela, a known pathogen of fish and warm-blooded animals was
 identified as responsible for wound infections  in dolphins  on the basis of 54 tests.   The methods of these
 investigators were sufficiently described or referenced to  use as a model for microbiological studies. Antibiotic
 resistance also was found during treatment of the lesions. This study demonstrated the importance of using the
 most up-to-date and extensive series of tests to provide the most information on potential pathogens and disease.
         Captive dolphins may be fed inadequate or inappropriate diets (Geraci and St. Aubin, 1980). Rejection
 Of food for long periods is  a poor prognostic sign. Other signs of distress and disease include continual circling

-------
                                                                                                    35
                               r-'                              -                       "
 of the tank without evident awareness of surroundings, thin or mucoid feces, partially closed eyes, hyperpnea,
 and lethargy (Simpson and Cornell, 1983).  Little is known of nutritional requirements of captive dolphins, but
 Geraci (1981) reviewed seven dietary disorders known or suspected to occur in marine mammals. He noted that
 these are not merely simple  deficiency diseases,  but complex diseases that may result from eating poorly
 preserved fish (as hi Vitamin E and C deficiencies  and scombroid poisoning from consuming rancid mackerel)
 or are caused by the antimetabolites hi specific fishes that bind or destroy essential nutrients. For example,
 thiamine deficiency can be induced by eating raw fish containing thiaminase enzymes, often found in herring and
 smelts that are commonly fed to marine mammals.   Geraci  (1981) also described clinical manifestations,
 successful treatments, and preventative measures.  However, the link between nutritional disorders and the
"occurrence of diseases caused by pathogens and parasites has not been explored.
         Although research on diseases found hi captive dolphins has unproved both hi quantity and quality over
 the years, the publication of case  reports appears to be dependent on the motivation of the individual scientists
 or veterinarians. Many reported cases of death hi captive dolphins are attributed to diseases initiated by stressful
 environmental conditions or poor husbandry practices. Such  reports might not be particularly valuable unless
 observations were made that would contribute to our understanding of disease mechanisms. Greenwood and
 Taylor (1977,1978, 1979) compiled information, on clinical and pathological findings hi captive small cetaceans
 that died hi Europe and South Africa hi 1976, and hi Europe in 1977 and 1978. These reports briefly described
 clinical diagnoses and noted whether  they had been correct, stated whether treatments were successful or only
 palliative, and listed the location and etiology of lesions, as well as significant microorganisms isolated to identify
 factors leading to high mortality. Data collected over a 3 year period pointed to the problem of severe infections
 contracted by the animals hi spite of advances made hi water treatment, food storage, and hygiene.  Greenwood
 and Taylor (1979) noted that trainers and keepers tended to attribute anorexia and malaise to factors other than
 diseases that required immediate clinical investigations. There has not been a similar series of reports on disease
 observations hi captive marine mammals in the United States. Regularly published reviews of clinical findings
 and research on the  etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment  of diseases from public and private facilities could
 provide an important service for communicating results  of studies to improve the condition of captive animals
 and direct related studies on stranded animals.
                                 STUDIES ON STRANDED DOLPHINS
         Research on diseases of stranded dolphins has increased substantially since Ridgway (1972) urged that
 stranded cetaceans be examined for disease.  Cowan et al. (1986) noted that although solitary strandings of
 dolphins appeared to be due to disease hi most instances,'many published reports "are of limited pertinence to
 the question of stranding" because they are studies of animals that have spent days to years hi oceanariums
 "where they are both treated medically  and exposed to the many hazards of  captivity" and  are not "pristine
 specimens from the  beach"  (Cowan et  al., 1986, 324).  However, finding stranded animals that are still hi
 acceptable condition  for pathological studies can be difficult. The condition depends on how long the animal
 has been dead before washing ashore, damage to the carcass by wave and sand action, and the time that passes
 until the animal is discovered.  A number of factors can complicate the observation of disease hi stranded
 animals.  Dailey (1985) cited a study by  Sweeney et al. (1976) hi which six cases of nocardiosis were found hi
 five species of cetacea  from the island of Oahu, Hawaii.  Four of the  cases were annuals that had been hi
 captivity for periods ranging from 7  months to  4 years, and the other  two cases were  dead  strandings.
 Nocardiosis was enzootic hi dairy cattle on the island from 1957 to 1961.  The authors did  not report other
 disease complications found at necropsy, but Dailey noted, "If the two stranded animals were typical, they were
 probably suffering from a combination of other problems" (Dailey, 1985, 810).
         Simpson and Cornell (1983) reviewed diseases associated with strandings of marine  mammals and noted
 that several factors were limiting the success of research on strandings.  These factors included the following:

-------
                                                                                                   36

        •   Few cases are available for examination, and when carcasses are found research is usually ad hoc,
            lacking experimental design and organized study;
            Deterioration of the tissues (autolysis) is often advanced, so it is difficult to identify any single
            cause of stranding or death;
        •   Necropsies may be performed by personnel without medical training,  and therefore important
            details may be overlooked;
        •   Specimens submitted for pathologic examination may not be representative  of the tissues or
            animals; and
        •   There is a lack of significant funding for thorough examinations.
        They noted that "cetacean strandings are less common and usually cause more media attention, evoking
& rash of hypotheses concerning the cause of the stranding, ranging from possibly correct, to rather fanciful"
(Simpson and Cornell, 1983,30). Despite the many theories that have been advanced to explain strandings, little
substantive research has been produced.  Four general theories for strandings  indicate disease, disturbance of
ccholocation, pursuit of food, and escape from danger as possible causes. Wood (cited in Geraci et al., 1978b)
proposed that stressed cetaceans seek safety on land when they are no longer able to sustain themselves in the
aquatic environment, perhaps exhibiting a primitive survival mode.
        Twenty-six publications of disease findings  in  stranded  dolphins were reviewed for this report.
References, information  on the study material, techniques used,  data presented, and diagnoses made  are
presented in Table 3. Only the species names for the dolphins examined in the report are listed, but common
names of other animals mentioned in the report are also given. The paper by Britt and Howard (1983) provided
only common names, not species names, for the cetaceans examined in their study of organochlorines in marine
mammals. Geraci et al. (1987) provided only common names for cetaceans in  their review of tumors, with the
exception of discussing their findings in a group of Lagenorhynchus acutus.  The number of  dolphins included
in each report ranged from one to several hundred.  The larger groups represented either compilations of
observations from single strandings over several years (e.g., Jones, 1987; Hersh et  al., 1990; Buck et al., 1991)
or samples from mass mortalities (e.g., Geraci et al., 1978b; Geraci, 1989).
        As for published reports on diseases in captive dolphins, the level of detail presented on the techniques
used and quality of the studies varied widely.  For example, Woodard et al. (1969) reported finding parasites in
several bottlenose dolphins from Florida, but did not provide details on necropsy and histology procedures used
except to note that all areas that had gross change were examined histologically. The report by Martin et al.
(1970) stated that the head was received for study after the animal expired but did not give any information on
the Slate or fate of the rest of the carcass.  Ridgway and Dailey (1972) reported findings  of parasites from
stranded dolphins and also undertook clinical studies of captured dolphins to support their hypotheses of how
trcmatode ova could reach the brain of the animals.  Cowan  et al.  (1986)  stated that bacteriological  and
lexicological studies were not done but presented detailed results of gross and histopathological  examinations.
         Beginning in the late 1970s,  investigations became more multidisciplinary in nature, with additional
techniques applied lo aid analyses of traditional gross and microscopic observations.  The first large-scab
examination of animals from a mass stranding was reported by Geraci et al. (1978b).  The report gave details
of the stranding event, including physical, geological, chemical, biological, meteorological, and tidal aspects at
Lingley Cove  Maine, that may have contributed to the stranding.  Forty-three complete carcasses were obtained
and frozen for several months prior to necropsy. Geraci et al. (1978b) noted that complete necropsies, including
analysis of stomach contents and flushing of parasites from cranial sinuses, lesions, and normal tissues were
examined histopathologically, microbes were recovered and isolates characterized, and samples of tissue were
taken for organochlorinc and heavy metal analysis. Apparently, the contaminant analyses were never completed
Gcract et al. (1978b) recommended establishment of an early alert network  for reporting strandings so that all
biological examinations could be performed on fresh specimens as  soon as possible after the event.
         The development of the stranding networks improved the capabilities of investigators to examine freshly
stranded animals and to have each animal  identified by reference number and archived for  additional stupes.
For example, Cowan ct al. (1986) examined parasite loads in a number of stranded animals.  Each animal was
identified by W.A. Walker's field reference  number. Deiter (1991) also gave field reference numbers but noted
that voucher materials had not been accessioned into a common facility.  Other  papers  listed Regujtry ol

-------


1
S
1
Q
cio
"3
1
S
Histopathology


1
0

1
1
•8^ '
f-< CA

}{jj|ji
J, •§ .if 1 "o ." .C* £
o *Q C as cj bO o *O


§
•o
§
§«I «!
"B" 1 i "i 1 1
1 2 1 1 1 1 1
« "o •;* _« J- •*-• w
•*•» 4) t-i *O o to ua
O w o> C "C (-H  JS.
11
!! '^1 '

CO
1°
*o j- \2
2 O Os
s
1 Su^! j!L
ill
lit
illlilll llii




"8 *, c1 fi g -"a §
1 1 1 1 •! 1 1
0
"3 M
- [«—-«> ^ *S t 'CH
lllg||||slliSl.sgs|



•u jj «
i! iifi!
13
o
1
O o\
^ S
37

-------
                                                                38
        •a
        •a

        £
        oo
        I
I
         8
         a


        1
        1*5
              •SI 3
              6-S >.
               f
                     e
                     .a

                     S1
                     •|
ill
<2 $£
.S 3 <2
           §  «s|-§ .5 53
           E  -0 O G «  BOO
                S
             iS S-S-bi-ei-a^'g

             flllilllltl
                                « a
              II
                                -_-

                              I 8 ? fi
                              S 3 & S
                              •S & R I

                              Hil
                              t;

                              0>

-------
        a
        '
U
i
i
a
        I
       1
                                                             39
                      ^lilll
                      » s g -g K .a s
                      .« c i, gL,3 g c

                      1 '•£ S •§ o .9 §
                      .G o H  w -M c
                      M .*j a a M g a.
                      •g g 1 6 -3 § e

                      llsl I 8*1 •
          S<

          •8
          2

-------
                                                                                                            40
5

1
 c/j
 o

 1

 I
  S1
         I'CgeE^g'go'r-O.qC;

          jlfrS 8.5 3 § .S ^§ S.  8.1
   8
       a

   o

-------
•o
I
•
H
























8
pj
0
1/3
'$
3
!
C/3
is
o
»
1
•4—*
#

3
1
I
Number of






8
a
t-t
**H

.0
•c
S
i

^G


species a
-e
•a
"Eb
0
0
J3
S,
g
•Sj
§
very brie
tigs given
>>5
§£
CL.

a
5
g 0
%
•O
U
n c
&-1

























Jtl*
5 1 s s
ra •" ui
j= e
•gj
w C
w o
^2 M
1 1
2 S
c g
n -2
0 "O
<2 "§
If
II






















c"
i

"S
u
•a
.§
e

60 stranded
37 stranded, 17

c
>»

a
0 ^
S|
c S
.2 "
di C
ui a.
performed
from 30 min

animals taken
along 100-mile
nonstranded D.
delphis


S
Ml
1
U-4
«•
11°
5 frs
§ ^'H<
w g" |
a &-S
to several days
after death
(stored

section of
southern
California
1




r-4
•8
C
w
s-
j)
- T3
I -8
S "3

-------
                                                                 42
             •a
             o  ^

            °NI

           tsli-s
            > ** y « 5
            §<*•§ 8 °
           •S S «^3
            g a"S^ 8
            H .9 w S -S3
             8 &£.*•
•o
a
GO
 p
~o


1
    t
_ .. J I S 5
S £ -S »- c -a
     is
 O
     «
     •£3
     6  §

-------
                .S3
                 (A

                 I
                s
                •3
                 u
 u

i
c
-------
                 11
               a « 1
               £i!
               S*-^ «
               E 13 £
               all
               -S o o
               |ot
               ?8*
                 ^ -s
•d

*
       iil-s
     Sj-o -g'g.13
     8 e 2 .2 .S

                        3
                        Is
            fllf-slplfl
            •SI &-§iSli<8 s-a-!
i

&
i
opathol
                           <2 §
O
                        .S

o
                        13
                        •8 S
                         <-l HH
S
   *b 5
   ,:, g
   •
   o  S
                 s s
                        -4
                        •b
                                  s

-------
             •Q
              u
              &
             00
              o
             I
1
3
             I
                                                                                                          45
c w  6, S S
                  .S '£
       C *O O

       is a  53
       " -a § £
       •S c S  E
       u o >SS  S
       S S S  e
                  32
                  13 PL,
                  1|



                  ffi E
    'S
    CO

-------
                                                                                                          46
             ts
        w iS  «
     bO °
tgnosis/Comments
.a
Q
•a
•o
ussed possibility of using
xicauda and Nasitrema •<
ogical tags for stock sepi
this dolphin along the w
many problems found
M 5 ~° £ a
•Qtj-S&S,
nals identified by field n
'£
A
ed data sheets and all M
iples archived in Departi
ertebrate Zoology at Sat
tara Museum of Natura
gsfiS





 a
00

-------
           1
           §
           U
I
I
"3
                                                                                    47
                                                   ,a
                 5 3 5
                 -tf «s t>
                a s
              ail
                  .™ x £* *a ed 13 *5j *"*
                  I « 1 i •§ I J 8
                         ^SIUII
               W W 4)
               8-S «
              | | |
                         B-;

-------
                                                                                                             48
              •a
              •a
              Si
              °°
Microbi
•a
a
I
 ex
 2
.S3
33
               1
               U
                         .
                    rs  o
                    2  I
         -1"1.S
                    S 'S & 8 -a 3 .s -5 -4 -3
                I
               <2
                o
               oS


-------
•"d


 g
CO
to

i
H
osis
        00
I
b

        o
     o "»

     J*

        l'
        •8
           2 -g
           •9 S < 8
           -81ft
           •o
           e
               II
               is 4>



                                                              49
                            a '? -o 2
                                    Ma







                            a § .2 ?• T3 .S S, S -o .2 c 3 S


                         f , -'IV

                    Jfl-2il.il!'-si

                    ill 111lllill

-------
                                                   50
               ° "2 13
             g. = §.8
             fit!
                    •
      1
1
S
a
       I
       I
                      n! it
                    J3X«ne^rtcJ44
    ,t

       •5
       8
       a
         e *
         O S

-------
          1

          *
T3
U
§
u
H
          •a
          a
           
-------
!
«*r
 o

i

*2
o
£3
o
O^
'1
a
1
53
oo
S
o
*0
ea
t
Ul
o



i
<->
^^
•£
u w-
55 <2 eo
8
S
o
l-l
«S
Pi
o "I*
a '1
™ ^
fB

i -3
1 -s
° -1"
1 s
s i
o
§ *O
S "
o •§

ill
•g .« 1
8 PI



aged by tooth
dentine layers,
sexes

"o
IB-
•3 "8 °
111
I,*l
n g a «a
«j 3 S c
§«i "a

tf § S «H § «
E x 3 o o .4 'a
.l||||l|f
SI 8 S8l-§ 8,
S S

**
O
g 0
M CS





                                                                                                                   52

-------
I
CO*
  »,
C3 *" ^ ~^
•s .2 ft S » ^ «
1 -a i £* -2 s a 2.^
1 si i |s --|.§ s1!
i ^S SB a« ^^« ^ §•
| l!i i in tit fs
I g-S I .22 g-Sl » 3 § 8-1 ^
ti ill n lift fits.!!
§ 8 1 I
(? £ KT 00
.2 >>
*O S J-* V Q 3
1 B. -s 1 I & •
c c
noted relationship to recent dolphi
teachings on east coast of United
States unknown
RCP/AFIP accession numbers give
for reference





"S CL, 1? g jM!o*jj

"sf-S'l-o'fe'g'^
lillJlllli
CO
•a «" § | -o
O O ^ cT *"§
n V "S § y
O rH -*3 5 W
c li »o "Eb *o
g.8 a ;. ^s.
|S||iiJ|i| ',•
lldlll^ill

is
:- e
rH f-J


















8*
                                                                                                                         53

-------
                                                                          54
         a

         S
         (3
         S,
         .2
         O
                         3*i!
                          s|l|
                          e &ns °
                        "S .2 3 "3 g .
                        a ts ° w s
                        §,| § 1 s-

                        S '11 i^ e •

                        l|f §|
                   g-^  Z § a a jj


                   II  Hill1
                   .S

              IS-fr I-B

              Sal §1
   11
              i«aa«-|si5.sr

             fill g-f-li-l ||

             8 s S.1 I'i 8 .§ I 2
             O

            ._.!•
            §5
       xl
 s  !=• &o .e .a
>-2 ,,.2 « •S'g

-------
C/D
 I

I
1
o
i
f
 C/3
a
j
1
 a

 S
13
Pi
                                                                                                                               55
                             i
           (_»
           g.
              bo    -S<

             §     %
           8 1
                                                  f

                                                  -3
                                                  o\
                         1    s

-------


















"8
s
•a
a

rX*
n
—
f2




















£2
S
a
"s
&
Q

a
CO
1
0
IB
o
b
S


0
1
od
Ot
2
.2
E



o
Va
O


*s
0
a
III
is£
J

4
O
C
B „•§ g

g .UJ S^ jg §
Jo | §1 ,{?•§ 8
S 8 2 "a 3 a ca
e .S e B w g o
§1 S? gil^g
1-1 full
2 e ••="•058
ilS'sfisi1
s§ pj-ESs.s.2
O t_» O *l— O f* >d *^
<*— tg >^j O y U " C C

I

o
c
.•S
"3



.1 gac •2baJi<2(/r -
|i|||| °|| °-|f^ 1

** OJQ 8 O"O ed^**^»2 *" ~
6,tj'raoM'3-Du)22"S{Jsgc
S^.^Sfi'S^Sgo-gSs^gS
2 g g w § 2 •§ &•§ a » S -S 0,-Bb
£ - eg . "3 c
to c o e TI §J
, J i .0 "8 | 1 I a 0
•r. -g S 3 g g £ •§ § -5 '5 -^ 1

8&Se2eS.u»2T3^-ot=.S
e
g ra^
1 2 | o 1 1
i§5St2^d
0 — ° c« ^
Siiit! si -*!! ii!

i~»
° «-4
1 §












analyses were
performed





























56

-------
                                                          57
       •§
       ti
13
 8 ca _, 43
   1 £

   tslllflfsli*
   IJIIlliP--^^
           i.a&
    r?
    II
    J? c
I
&
f-;
o-

S
tT
TC
       §
       ID
   
-------
§

a
o
a
(S
s
 o
'-§

O
00
                                                                        58
     ,     «•

    1 11! -I"

      "  '
B^-E^g-s!

-------
                                                                                                    59

 Comparative Pathology (RCP)/AF1P accession numbers (Inskeep, 1990), Smithsonian catalog numbers (Kuehl
 et al., 1991), or Mote Marine Laboratory case numbers (Rawson et al., 1991) for reference.  Barros and Odell
 (1990) provided both field numbers and Regional Stranding Network numbers for each case they discussed. The
 use of identifying codes for each animal should  aid in the analysis of stranding data and allow for the cross-
 referencing of multidisciplinary studies and the archiving of materials at different facilities.
         The most ambitious study  of a mass mortality of dolphins was reported by Geraci (1989).  The
 conclusions reached were also the most controversial. Data or specimens from 347 T.  truncates that stranded
 on the U.S. east coast from June 1987 to March 1988 were available for study.  Gross findings from 240 partial
 and 46 complete necropsies  were presented in the report in a table by the number of animals with lesions,
 although no information was  available on exactly  which animals had multiple lesions.  Lesions from 95 dolphins
 were examined histologically, 48 dolphins were examined for bacteria, and 42 for chlamydia. Additional studies
 using electron  microscopy, virology,  and chemical analyses were performed on subsets of dolphins by various
 research groups and institutions around the country. The animals had suffered a variety of diseases and lesions,
 including unusual epidermal blistering and sloughing of the  skin, massive systemic bacterial infections, and
 necrosis of liver, lung, pancreas, and heart. Viruses, however, were not found in any unusual types or numbers,
 although serological tilers to  antibodies of a morbillivirus, canine distemper virus, were found in 6 of 13 blood
 samples from dolphins captured alive off Virginia Beach in October 1987 (no active viral infection was present).
 No single pattern of pathogens or parasites was evident from the studies. Chemical analyses performed on 75
 dolphins (organochlorines) and 68 dolphins (heavy metals) showed that detectable amounts of DDTs, chlordanes,
 and PCBs were present in every blubber and liver sample. The concentrations found in one animal were among
 the highest values ever recorded in any animal tissue.
        Based  on suspected  confounding factors, 17 dolphins were tested for  red tide toxins (Geraci 1989).
 Brevetoxin was found in eight of those dolphins, hi one menhaden from the stomach of one dolphin, and in one
 fresh-caught fish.  Other fish  species  tested from  the study area did not have this red tide toxin. The research
 team concluded that the brevetoxin poisoning was responsible for the death of the dolphins (since an unusual
 bloom of Ptychodiscus  brevis occurred off North Carolina in  October of 1987).  The  dolphins  appeared
 emaciated; utilization of their blubber reserves had reduced their buoyancy and insulation and released stored
 pollutants. It was speculated that the combined stresses had led to decreased immunocompetence, and the
 animals  had  succumbed to opportunistic bacterial infections (Geraci, 1989).   However, this scenario was
 challenged by a number of researchers, resulting in a congressional hearing (Foglietta, 1989). Critics noted that
 the animals had begun dying before the red tide occurred and that many red tides occur in the Gulf of Mexico
 without such effects on the bottlenose dolphins  there.  The  effects of brevetoxin on  marine mammals are
 unknown, but PCBs can impair functioning of the immune system and liver and cause skin lesions in terrestrial
 mammals and humans. Although PCBs were found in a large subsample of animals, only a few animals and fish
 were tested for  the red tide toxins and the results were not significant. In defending the study's conclusions, Dr.
 Geraci noted that little is known of the effects of toxic contaminants on dolphins, how much contamination can
 occur before effects are observable, and whether the animals can metabolize the compounds. He also noted that
 it would  be impossible to perform  appropriate lexicological tests on marine mammals.  The 1989 report had
 recommended further studies on biotoxins (such as toxin from red tide) in  marine mammals and on whether
 chemical contaminants at the levels found in this study could have  affected  susceptibility to biotoxins or
 pathogens. Early necropsies and microbiological analyses had revealed that the animals had died of generalized
 infections and septicemia, and had been weakened  by immunosuppression or some malfunction of a major organ
 before infection by microorganisms (Brody, 1989). Smith (1990) noted that over 50 percent of the bacteriologic
 isolates were vibrios and  hypothesized that sewage  dumping (washing up on beaches at the tune of the
 strandings) could have increased the  numbers of vibrios to levels that  could not be tolerated by the dolphins,
 changing the normally saprophytic bacteria to a pathogen.
       Additional studies have been  conducted on chemical contaminants in marine mammals.  In addition to
the dangers of exposure to floating or  fouling oil and inhalation of volatile organics (Geraci and St. Aubin, 1982;
Geraci, 1990) and other air pollutants (Rawson et al., 1991), pollutants such as nutrients, microbial pathogens,
and toxic organic and inorganic chemicals are discharged into estuaries, nearshore coastal waters, and the open
ocean from municipal and chemical point source effluents, agricultural and urban nonpoint  source runoff, and

-------
                                                                                                  60

ocean dumping (Gaskin, 1982; Haebler and Moeller, 1993). As noted by Haebler and Moeller (1993), many
complex and varied factors affect the acute and long-term biological effects of contaminants, their fate and
transport, their accumulation in the food web, and synergistic interactions with environmental conditions that can
result in an increased incidence of disease in marine organisms.  Among  the  suite of proposed biomarkers
(biochemical, physiological, and histological indicators to assess exposure to, or effects of, xenobiotic chemica s
on organisms) are a number of assays to analyze chemically-induced toxic  effects on immunocompetent cells
(McCarthy and Shugart, 1990; Weeks et al., 1992).  Measurements of either individual components or the entire
immune system may be used to monitor changes that could adversely affect the health of aquatic animals. The
Laboratory for Marine Mammal Immunology, University of California, Davis, California, is developing functional
assays for blood samples to measure immune status in several species of marine mammals (J.L. Stott, D. Ferrick,
Department of Microbiology/Immunology, University of California, personal communication).
        It is important to note that all studies will be more valuable from a comparative standpoint if similar
methods and techniques are used. Kuehl et al. (1991) used standard procedures  for chemical analysis of tissues
developed by EPA's Environmental Research Laboratory in Duluth, Minnesota.  The NMFS is also working on
procedures for these chemical analyses (Calambokidis et al., 1984; see below). Details of the procedures must
be jnvcn in reports to assist in the interpretation of the results. Aguilar (1985) noted that there may be problems
in sampling different tissues.  In particular, he  noted that the blubber is not a homogeneous tissue and
orEanochlorines may be differentially distributed in the lipids. Borrell and Aguilar (1990) examined the problem
of^analyzing chemicals in a decomposing stranded dolphin over a period of 55 days.  They noted that some
disease states may lead to abnormal rates of metabolization and excretion of pollutants; fat reserves may have
been mobilized as the animal's health declined; and pollutants in the carcass, may be affected by direct exposure
to sun  high temperatures, wind, bacterial activity, and other factors before sampling occurs, thus altering the
composition and concentration of chemicals originally present in the tissues.  They found that concentrations of
oreanochlorine pollutants (PCBs and DDTs) in muscle varied widely during the study, probably as a result of
weather conditions and variation in water content of the tissue.  The lipid content of, the blubber progressively
decreased with time, perhaps due to leaking and volatilization of lipids during direct exposure to the sun   Tissue
residue levels generally decreased" over time, but the decreases were not identical for all of the organochlorines
studied. Thus, badly preserved or unpreserved stranded cetaceans should be considered unreliable for this type

       ^The presence of lipophilic xenobiotics in blubber samples will also vary because of changes in the
animal's diet and nutritional status, its sex and age,  and its reproductive status   Females may  transfer
contaminants to the fetus during gestation and to the offspring during lactation. This fact leads to the result flia
levels of contaminants in mature males are higher than those observed in mature females (a relationship that
will be more pronounced for organochlorines than for heavy metals), although there may be other confoundmg
factors (Tanabe et al., 1982; Reijnders, 1988, Cockcroft et al., 1989). Law et al. (1991) examined concentrations
of seven trace metals in the livers of seals, porpoises, 5. coeruleoalba, T. truncatus, L acutus, L. albirostns, and
D. delphis near the British Isles, finding elevated  concentrations  of mercury  and lead in animals from  the
Liverpool Bay area. They urged the development of more structured studies to assess the real risks to coastal
marine mammal populations.  Other issues in the study  of ^^^^°^^ T^TrUB
impacts of tissue contamination in cetaceans have been discussed by Risebrough  (1978), Tanabe et al. (1983,
 1988), Reijnders (1986,1988), and Granby and Kinze (1991).
         Other questions remain. Landy (1980) reviewed reports of neoplasms in marine mammals, listing eight
 cases in T. truncates.  He observed that most cases  in cetaceans were found  in  the whales collected during
 whaling expeditions or from sporadic necropsies of beached animals.  Since carcinogens had been linked to the
 induction of neoplasms  in fish, he proposed that the increasing pollution of the sea  might lea1 toa sirmla
 situation in marine mammals. Howard et al. (1983b) noted that so few tumors were found '" cetacean
 because they were not susceptible to  neoplasia) that it would  be difficult to correlate observed e
 exposure to carcinogens  in these organisms and appropriate experimental studies arc not feas.ble  Geraa et aL
 (1987) rcanaly/ed 52 tumors reported in cetaceans, finding that  23 reports had  been sufficiently  deta.led to
  onfirm the £oposcd diagnoses'while 15 tumors had been  inadequately described  but did have  acceptable
 diagnoses.  They disputed 12 diagnoses, but confirmed 4 of those cases by combimng origmal descriptions and

-------
                                                                                                     61

 illustrations with contemporary information on etiology and classification. Adding 14 more cases from their files
 brought the total to 41 confirmable tumors.  Geraci et al. (1987) noted that the distribution of tumors in
 cetaceans was most likely the result of biased sampling and the difficulties of examining all organ systems in large
 animals or mass-stranded herds. In addition to the concern that neoplasms could be related to environmental
 pollutants, they discussed other etiological scenarios, such as hormonal influences and viruses, and urged caution
 in seeking causative agents while carefully documenting each case for future examination.
         Haebler and Moeller (1993) reiterated the concerns of Geraci et al. (1987) regarding sampling biases
 and disagreements over diagnosis and interpretation of tumors among pathologists. They called for a centralized
 registry to archive microscopic slides and biological data from marine mammals with tumors in order to provide
 an opportunity for more pathologists to examine the material and pool scientific information, standardize tumor
 nomenclature and diagnosis, and compare data to improve our understanding of the temporal and geographic
 distribution of tumor incidence. Although the AFIP maintains an appropriate facility for such materials, many
 cases reported in the literature (cases of neoplasms as well as other diseases and lesions) have not been archived
 there.  (The AFIP is a voluntary program.) The use of new techniques to search for DNA-carcinogen adducts
 may provide additional insights into the presence of pollutant or nonpollutant mechanisms for genetic damage
 in these animals leading to the formation of neoplasms (Ray et al., 1991).
         Interpreting the disease findings for stranded animals remains difficult.  In reviewing the literature on
 diseases of stranded animals, Simpson and Cornell (1983) noted that heavy parasite loads were often seen in such
 animals; but since other debilitating  diseases  were seen as well, the major cause of the stranding was not easy
 to determine.  The  pathogenicity of the parasite depends on location in the body and number of parasites,
 general health and nutritional state of the host, and other endogenous or exogenous chemical or immune effects
 that the parasite may present to the host.  They suggested that investigators need to arrange parasites in order
 of "known lethal influence" and then come to a diagnostic consensus.  However, the extent  of pathogenicity of
 one or more parasites  may not be well-defined.   Is the host's condition a result of the parasitism or  is the
 parasitism the result of the host's condition?  The contribution of parasites to morbidity and mortality is often
 treated as a matter of relative probabilities because the prior condition of the animal is not known.  Howard et
 al. (1983a) stated that it was also difficult to attribute the cause of death to bacterial infections because growth
 of natural or pathogenic endogenous bacteria can occur quickly, especially in warm temperatures.  Most stranded
 cetaceans are already dead when they wash ashore, live stranded cetaceans are usually already diseased and die
 from overheating and cardiovascular collapse.  Stranding stress may also  increase opportunistic infections.
 Moreover, bacterial diseases  or septicemias may occur secondarily hi other diseases such  as malnutrition,
 parasitosis, and neoplasia. Swabs need to be  taken during necropsy from all organs and tissues, not only from
 obvious lesions, and from heart blood.  Pyothorax or deep tissue lesions or wounds should also be examined for
 anaerobes.
        Cowan et al. (1986) examined beached dolphins collected over 4 years from a 100-mile stretch of
 coastline near Los Angeles, California. Fifty-one of the 81 animals recovered by the Marine Mammal Disease
 Surveillance Program were suitable for pathological examination.  Cowan et al. (1986) divided their findings into
 three categories:
        1)   Residual old diseases or minor active diseases probably unrelated to stranding;
        2)   Severe  or fulminant processes probably causing the stranding; and
        3)   Processes related to tumbling about in the surf and lying up out of the water on the beach.
        Although a variety of lesions were related to the latter problem, they noted that cardiovascular system
 disease, found widely in this sample, was probably unrelated to stranding.  They suggested that the cause of these
 subepicardial scar lesions was periods of vasospasm, with no evidence of viral or toxin involvement. The mixing
 of pre-existing and acute disease was  most readily seen in the liver.  A number of hypotheses were proposed to
 explain the various findings, including nutritional or diffuse toxic etiology, particularly in regard to the liver and
mammary gland changes that appeared to be similar to those  found in cattle exposed to  highly chlorinated
organic compounds.  They reported that no liver disease had been found in 68 individuals of 2 pelagic species
of dolphins that would not have been exposed to significant environmental contamination (Cowan and Walker,
 1979).   Parasitic damage was described and appropriately discussed, with events reconstructed, as a cause of
stranding mortalities.  Cowan et al. (1986)  concluded that catastrophic diseases causing immediate death would

-------
                                                                                                  62

result in loss at sea, so the diseases found in this study represent those that allow dolphins to survive long enough

to reach^1g^n       (1986y report provided a careful analysis of the possible set of lesions occurring in
critical areas that maybe the proximate cause(s) of stranding. Toxins were postulated to P^y a larger role than
S be determined by morphological methods alone, and should be investigated m ^ure studies  ^0= tuches
have reported links to nutritional disorders in stranded animals except for the occurrence of malnutrition at the
S Snding, which may have been caused by pathogens, parasites, or exposure to contaminants  Mead and
Patter (1990) however, noted no apparent differences in species composition between stomach contents o tm
sbaufed IT truncates and 6  dolphins captured incidentally in nets (admittedly a very limited comparison).
S^«*S£ai be undertaken £ this area. With the postulated loss of 50 percent of the estonated
boulcnose dolphin  (T. truncatus) migratory stock from the U.S. Atlantic coast during the  1987-1988  mass
moctaJky (Scott and Burn, 1987; Scott et al, 1988), additional studies of diseases and the role of envnx^ental
(factors will be necessary to understand their influence on mortalities in this and other species of dolphm.


                                 ONGOING RESEARCH PROGRAMS


         Following the  1987-1988 bottlenose dolphin mass mortality on the Atlantic coast, additional efforts have
been made to support research on  dolphin physiology, nutrition, biochemistry, immunology, ' "*£***£
These programs are designed largely to establish baseline levels of tasue contammants and to determnie the role
of StaS bioaccumulaTion and exposure to biological toxins in relation to dolphin leases and stranding
        £  Sul information can be used to better assess risks to the health of various dolphin populations
     S to continued studies undertaken at captive dolphin facilities, disease research performed on stranchng.
     Mnson 1991), and long-term monitoring studies on feral populations in the field wdl continue. A few of the
       projecTie ^cussf d in this section. As mentioned previously, the IAAAM Tissue Registry provides a
 moi^
 archived in their laboratories. While many of the requests are for »o«ntf 
-------
                                                                                                  63

 manual for use by stranding network members.  This manual will include an inventory and description of all
 marine mammals  in U.S. and Canada  coastal waters, detailed information on  handling stranded marine
 mammals, and various sample collection protocols.
         NMFS has also revised the Regional Stranding Network program to include the originally separate
 National Marine Mammal Tissue Bank (NMMTB), located in Gaithersburg, MD.  Although initially proposed
 by Risebrough (1978), this program was set up in response to the 1987-1988 east coast dolphin die-off to obtain
 baseline levels of environmental contaminants and biotoxins in marine mammals from the Atlantic, Pacific, and
 Gulf of Mexico coasts of the United States.  The combined program consists of four components—Stranding,
 Monitoring,  Tissue Bank, and Quality Assurance-with activities recommended  by the NMMTB Team of
 Scientists.  The Stranding component is designed to improve the reporting of basic data from marine mammal
 standings, to upgrade the capacity of Stranding Networks to respond more effectively to mortality events, and
 to provide data that can be used for management purposes. The Monitoring portion of the program will conduct
 a standard suite of analyses on 10 to 20 marine mammals from incidental fisheries catches or mass strandings
 in each region, depending on the availability of funds. The normal suite of analyses will  include organic and
 inorganic compounds and toxins from blubber and liver tissue, necropsy, and histopathology.  The Tissue Bank
 will collect and store selected marine mammal tissues on a regular basis to be used in the monitoring studies,
 as well as archiving them for future comparisons (NMFS 1992a).
        The Quality Assurance component of the combined program was developed by the National Institute
 of Standards and Technology (MIST) in collaboration with the NMFS's Environmental Conservation Division
 in Seattle, Washington. This program will test and evaluate analytical methods for organic contaminants in lipid-
 rich tissue matrices, conduct  and evaluate interlaboratory comparison exercises with NIST and other NOAA
 laboratories involved hi marine mammal tissue analyses, and develop Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) of
 blubber and liver for use in the analysis of marine mammal tissues.  A team of scientists drawn from marine
 mammal research, analytical chemistry, chemical contaminants, toxicology, and specimen banking backgrounds
 was consulted during the development of the program (Lillestolen et al., in press).  Duplicate « 150 g samples
 are banked, with one duplicate homogenized and the other remaining in bulk form. Fifty percent of each
 specimen will be available to the scientific community upon written request to the Director of NMFS/OPR (and
 with informal review by three members of the NMMTB's Team of Scientists), and 50 percent is intended for
 long-term storage.
        For Fiscal  Year 1991, full analyses were initiated on 11 freshly  dead stranded T. truncytus from the
 southeast region. The Alaska Marine Mammal Tissue Archival Project was established in 1987 by the MMS,
 as part of the National Biomonitoring Specimen Bank (NBSB) program at the NIST, to establish a representative
 collection of Alaskan marine mammal tissues taken during native subsistence hunts for future contaminant
 analysis and documentation of long-term trends in environmental quality.  This program is now being managed
 by the NMMTB & SN Program (NMFS 1992a).  Currently, samples from 72 animals representing 8 species have
 been collected, and some samples have been analyzed for inorganic and organic compounds (Becker et al., 1992;
 NMMTBB & SN Program 1992 Update).   Another program for analyzing levels of pollutants and
 biotoxins in marine mammals is under way following a workshop held by the MMS Gulf of Mexico Region in
 the summer of 1989 (Tucker and Associates, Inc., 1990).
        A study of Sarasota Bay, FL, bottlenose dolphins (ongoing since 1970) is the longest running study
 involving repeated sampling of dolphins hi the wild. This project has been conducted by a number of scientists
 and veterinarians, with the assistance  of over 200 volunteers from Earthwatch, New College, the University of
 Florida, the University of South Florida, and the University of California at Santa Cruz. This research has been
 supported by funding  from Mote  Marine  Laboratory, the MMC, NMFS, the Inter-American Tropical  Tuna
 Commission, the University of California at Santa Cruz, the Denver Wildlife Research Center, Earthwatch, the
 Office of Naval Research,  and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, as well as  donations of funds and
equipment to Dolphin Biology Research Associates (Wells, 1991). The behavior and ecology of the Sarasota
group of dolphins have been studied, particularly the social system and patterns of social development (reviewed
in Scott et al., 1990). As of 1988, 85 of the approximately 100 community members were readily recognizable,
65 had been handled since the sampling program began hi 1984, 74 were  of known gender, 56 were of known
age, and 53 were of known gender and age. The sampling procedure, which has been described by Wells (1991),

-------
                                                                                                 64

then the dolphin is freeze-branded, and pictures are taken of fins and scars.
                              «^^^
                                        ^
          e^

immunosuDoressive pollutants in diseases and standings of dolphins.
        In Se^ake^f the 1987-1988 bottlenose dolphin mass mortalities, additional support for studies to

                                       the assessment of the health and health trends of marine mammal
                                                 between environmental parameters and marine mammal
             healt  fel      nan adequate understanding of the causes of marine mammal brandings and

                                     of the presence, levels, and effects of potentially harmful contaminants
                       SarSd methods for reporting stranded, dying, dead, or otherwise mcapacitated
         .     oormyt5 for the collection, preparation, and archiving of marine mammal tissues; and
         .   A need for broad access to data through a central data base to gather information on marine
             mammals and analyses of their tissues.                                       introduced  bv

















  parameters.

-------
                                                                                                    65
                                            CONCLUSIONS
         Investigations of diseases and causes of mortalities in captive and stranded dolphins have established that
 a variety of pathogenic microorganisms, parasitic infestations, and nutritional disorders can adversely affect the
 health of these mammals.  The quality of studies being performed has improved over the years, with greater
 emphasis being placed on testing hypotheses, examining larger numbers of animals, and designing studies to
 include  control animals.  The need  for  adequate,  long-term sources of support and continued training
 opportunities for scientists and veterinarians involved in dolphin disease research has been recognized.
         The necessity of integrating our knowledge of hazards in the marine environment with a thorough
 understanding of mammalian diseases  and the basic biology of healthy "normal" animals has also been noted.
 New studies testing for the bioaccumulation of toxic pollutants, as well as naturally occurring toxic substances,
 will provide additional information on  the role of environmental contamination in susceptibility to pathogens.
 Investigations are also under way to characterize the immune system of dolphins and other cetaceans that should
 aid in the treatment of captive and live-stranded animals.  Many of the reports on captive and stranded dolphins
 noted that animals appeared to have suppressed immune systems, but further understanding of the cetacean
 immune system will be necessary to interpret the disease state (Bossart, 1984; Lahvis et al., 1992).
         Diagnoses of diseases in captive animals, however, may provide little insight into the prevalence and
 distribution of different, often unrelated, diseases found in wild animals.  Social groupings, individual and herd
 behavior, and migration patterns, as well as the effects of other factors (pathogens, physiology, toxic chemicals,
 environmental conditions) on young or adult animals,  must be taken into account when examining diseases in
 stranded or incidentally captured dolphins.  Studies of physiology, biochemistry, and pathogenesis in captive
 animals  can provide information essential to understanding mechanisms of disease (Dr. J.R. Geraci, Ontario
 Veterinary College,  personal communication).   Thus, research  on  captive and stranded dolphins should
 complement, but not replace, one another, and both must be continued to provide the strongest program for
 disease studies.
                                        RECOMMENDATIONS
        NMFS is continuing to resolve issues arising from the operation of the stranding networks.  There
appear to be problems, however, with inconsistencies in the types and numbers of tissue samples collected from
each stranded animal, proper labeling and handling of tissues for chemical analyses, and the collection of
appropriate materials to obtain the age, gender, and reproductive status of the specimen (teeth and reproductive
organs).   Additional information on the taxonomic status of the species (e.g., inshore/offshore/embayment
populations of T. truncatus) and their natural histories (e.g., feeding, diet, nutritional requirements, migrations)
is needed.  Better coordination of collecting activities will also be  required  to ensure  that all  interested
investigators can obtain exactly  what they need, preserved by the appropriate method, as soon as possible
following  notification that a stranding has occurred.  Several recommendations for  improving the Regional
Marine Mammal Stranding Networks were developed at the Second Marine Mammal Stranding Workshop
(Reynolds and Odell, 1991).  Interagency and individual cooperation should be encouraged to make the best use
of these relatively scarce research materials and to develop the broadest base of information for the identification
and interpretation of dolphin diseases and then- contributions to stranding mortalities.
       Based on the published reports reviewed here, it is  evident that the more tests and supporting
information gathered for each animal—whether captive, stranded, or collected—the more useful the information
will be. While the NMMTB program performs chemical analyses, necropsy, and histopathology on tissues from
each animal to be examined, apparently microbiological examinations are not included; such examinations may
be helpful, however, to properly interpret the histopathological findings in freshly dead animals.  Furthermore,
skeletal remains, in particular the head, reproductive organs, and other materials, have not been collected for
each specimen. At the very least, the proper curation and archiving of tissues  and organs collected before the

-------
                                                                                                   66
condition of the carcass deteriorates or, in the case of skeletal structures  before the carcass is buried with
maintenance of all information on each case, should permit qualified investigators to continue multidisciphnary

studies.     following recommendations ^ proposed to strengthen and enhance the study of diseases in
                                                                                          dolphm  ^

            discussed in Wilkinson, 1991).  All interested parties, identified previously for each region and/or
            technical specialty, should be notified immediately when captive, stranded, or collected dolphins are
            available for study, and all participants in a case should be kept informed about the  studies being
            conducted to maximize cooperation and minimize redundancy. Concurrent studies on apparently
            healthy dolphins, as well as those showing signs of disease, must be performed to provide valuable
            baseline comparative data (e.g., Rommel et al., 1991).
            The latest techniques and equipment should be used whenever possible, following established quahty
            assurance procedures for each, and standardized methods need to be established whenever possible
            to increase the validity of comparisons with  other  studies.  (NMFS is working with Regional
            Stranding Networks to develop standardized protocols for  conducting necropsies on  stranded
            animals and to collect more extensive data and tissues for analyses.)  This will require interagency
            cooperation in the development of such methods (e.g., chemical  analyses) and the  training of
            appropriate personnel.  New  methods that could  increase the amount of information  such as
            microbiological cultures, biochemical tests, tissue cultures and biomarker techniques, should be also
              ae  currently in operation (e.g., MMEP and NMMTB)  should be fully supported with
             appropriate computer equipment and personnel. If new databases should be required for storing
             the data collected during these studies (morphological,  chemical, pathological, other), and for
             tracking transfers of materials and locations of archived material (as in § 307 of  the 'Marine
             Mammal Health and Stranding Response Act), they must be carefully developed and should be
             identified for, and be accessible by, researchers.  Some of these functions coul(f probably be added
             to the databases maintained by MMEP andNMMTB, provided adequate equipment, personnel, and
             Ions-term support are provided.
             Types of disease data collected and research to be performed on each case should be standardized.
             NMFS plans to establish a national information database to include information on collected tissues,
             disposition of the collected tissues, and a summary of research conducted on these tissues to support
             the Monitoring and NMMTB components of the Regional Stranding Networks program.  The issue
             of whether Level B and C data (Appendix A) are  proprietary and, thus, may be released at the
             discretion of the researcher (Wilkinson, 1991) needs further clarification. If data are not published
             within a certain period of time, then the data should be entered into the appropriate database (e.g
             in particular, other data, not  in the researcher's specialty, collected during a study but not intended
             for publication)  All data collected on one animal should be  identified by field and archiving
             numbers (assigned by the stranding network regional director) for easy cross-referencing.
             Disease researchers must be aware of current taxonomic revisions and systematics research since
             this information may aid in establishing parasite or pathogen relationships, or new discoveries may
             be made concerning distributions of different populations  of dolphins or migration patterns that
             could provide  additional information on exposure to environmental stresses contributing  to
             mortalities. The latest review of marine  mammal diseases by Dierauf (1990)  contamed several
             references to Stenella plagiodon, although this species had been synonymized with S. frontahs  by
             Perrin and colleagues in 1987.  Research should be  continued on the inshore/offshore/embayment
             populations of T. truncatus (Mead and Potter, 1990), as well as other systematic problems. Because
             Sstematics research may result in new  species names and changes in current names as our
             understanding of species and their evolutionary  relationships  is refined, appropriate voucher
             materials from each carcass must be collected and  archived to aid in this research and prevent the

-------
                                                                                                    67

           loss of costly data to future investigators (Lee et al., 1982; Heyning, 1991; Association of Systematics
           Collections Alert).
        •  A more rapid method of dissemination of research results should be pursued.  In addition to
           professional  meetings, workshops, and peer-reviewed publications, an accessible database could
           provide up-to-date information on all aspects of disease research for these'animals.  The location
           of archived tissues, organs,  and skeletal  remains available for study could also be stored on this
           system, and studies in progress or results of studies from laboratories around the country could be
           cross-referenced to provide a more complete picture of disease factors and processes for each
           animal examined.  Annual reviews of the results of these studies should also be published to provide
           a continuing record of the status of dolphin disease research, along the lines of Greenwood and
           Taylor (1977, 1978, 1979), but with more detail.
        •  Archiving of histological preparations of diseased  and  normal tissues needs  to be improved.
           Researchers  should  submit materials to the AFJP  so that they  are  available to all qualified
           investigators for study. Workshops and courses utilizing these materials should be presented. In
           particular, a  workshop on neoplasms  in marine mammals should be held to improve diagnosis of
           neoplastic diseases and related disorders of these animals and to standardize tumor nomenclature,
           as has been recently  implemented for fish and invertebrate neoplasms.  Publication of an atlas of
           marine mammal neoplasms would also be useful for comparative studies.
        Clearly, there have been problems in the past with the completeness of published studies, but the value
of multidiscipunary investigations of dolphin diseases has been recognized.  The Marine Mammal Health and
Stranding Response Act may help the field in terms of providing additional support, especially funding for quick
response to mass mortality events, as well  as improving  facilities and training for marine  mammal disease
specialists.  However, support must be provided for more comprehensive studies.  Furthermore, there must be
more equitable sharing of funds by agencies and researchers. While it is difficult to predict the availability of
dolphins for studies on their health or assessments of stranding mortalities, qualified investigators should be able
to receive prior peer review and approval of proposed research strategies, and then be notified and allowed to
participate in field or oceanarium studies as opportunities arise.  Funds could be made available for this type
of research as proposed by the investigator (such as  travel to/from site within the investigator's home region,
expendable supplies, certain analytical procedures). Databases storing the information collected from individual
and mass strandings, analytical procedures performed, or archiving will also require additional support.  These
databases will continue to be important for comparative studies and for analyzing long-term trends.  Because
funding is limited, further discussions of the appropriate use of available monies should be encouraged to identify
and support the most promising research leads while maintaining valuable archives for disease research.
        Recently, mass mortalities of 150 striped dolphins (S.  coeruleoalba) occurred in the summer of 1991 on
beaches of the Greek island of Zakinthos and around the coast of Italy and Sicily. Investigators have found
animals infected with same morbillivirus that caused striped dolphin mortalities off the Mediterranean coasts of
Spain and France during the_summer of 1990 (Jones, 1991a; Domingo et al., 1992). Currently, a reduced food
supply  is  suspected  of  leading  to  starvation, with  suppression  of the immune system  and  release of
immunodepressant PCBs, which may increase the susceptibility of the animals to  the virus. Or, possibly a highly
pathogenic virus has been introduced into an immunologically naive population.  As  in the 1987-1988 mass
mortality of  T. truncatus on  the U.S.  east coast, some animals contained unusually high levels of these
compounds.  Mass strandings of T. truncatus occurred in February and March of 1990 along the coast of Texas,
with 112 animals  in a two county area affected.  Scientists are continuing investigations of environmental stress,
toxic contaminant or biotoxin exposure,  and immune system dysfunction as possible factors in these mortalities
(NMFS, 1992b).  As this apparent epizootic of morbillivirus spreads eastward in the  Mediterranean (Jones,
1991b) and strandings continue along the coasts of the United States,  scientists and veterinarians need to have
access to programs and funding that will allow rapid response and thorough analysis of the health of stranded
dolphins and that can be integrated with disease research programs at captive facilities.

-------
                                                                                     68
                              LIST OF ACRONYMS
AHP
AWA
CITES

DDTs
EPA
ESA
FWS
GC/MS
IAAAM
MABs
MMC
MMEP
MMIG
MMPA
MMS
MST
NOAA

NMFS
NMFS/OPR
NMMTB&SN

NMMTB
NMNH
PCBs
PCDDs/PCDFs
QA/QC
SEAN
SRM
USDA/APHIS
Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
Animal Welfare Act
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora
dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane and related compounds
Environmental Protection Agency
Endangered Species Act
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
International Association of Aquatic Animal Medicine
monoclonal antibodies
Marine Mammal Commission
Marine Mammal Events Program (Smithsonian Institution)
Marine Mammal Interest Group
Marine Mammal Protection Act
Minerals Management Service (Department of the Interior)
National Institute of Standards and Technology
National Oceanic  and  Atmospheric  Administration  (Department  of
Commerce)
National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA)
National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources
National Marine  Mammal Tissue Bank and Stranding Network Program
(Oceans Act of 1992)
National Marine Mammal Tissue Bank
National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian Institution)
polychlorinated biphenyls
polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/polychlorinated dibenzofurans
quality assurance/quality control
Scientific Event and Alert Network (Smithsonian Institution)
standard reference materials  (NMMTB)
United States Department of Agriculture/Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service

-------
                                         LITERATURE CITED


 Abate, M.  1991.  Captives from the sea. Underwater Natur. 20(2):16-18.

 Aguilar, A. 1985. Compartmentation and reliability of sampling procedures in organochlorine pollution surveys
 of cetaceans. Residue Rev. 95:91-114.


 Barros, N.B., and D.K. Odell. 1990. Food habits of bottlenose dolphins in the southeastern United States.  In
 The bottlenose dolphin, ed. S. Leatherwood and R. Reeves, pp. 309-328. Academic Press, San Diego.

 Becker, P.R., SA. Wise, M.M. Schantz, BJ. Koster, and R. Zeisler.  1992.  Alaska Marine Mammal Tissue
 Archival Project: Sample Inventory and Results of Analyses of Selected Samples for Organic Compounds and Trace
 Elements.  National Institute of Standards and Technology (CSTL), Gaithersburg, MD, prepared in cooperation
 with National Ocean Service, Anchorage, AK, Arctic Environmental Assessment Center, February.  National
 Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, PB92-143718.


 Borrel, A., and A. Aguilar. 1990.  Loss of organochlorine compounds in the tissues of a decomposing stranded
 dolphin. Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 45:46-53.


 Bossart, G.D.' 1984. Suspected acquired immunodeficiency in an Atlantic bottlenose dolphin with chronic-active
 hepatitis and lobomycosis.  J. Am.  Vet. Med. Assoc.  185(11):1413-1414.

 Britt, J.O., and E.B. Howard.  1983.   Tissue residues of selected environmental contaminants in marine
 mammals.  In Pathobiology of Marine Mammal Diseases, Vol. II, ed. E.B. Howard, pp. 79-94. CRC Press  Boca
 Raton,  Florida.                                                                                '


 Brody,  M.  1989. Explaining sea mammal deaths proves challenging. J. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 55 (ll):595-598.

 Brown, D.H., R.W. Mclntyre, CA. Delliquadri, and R J. Schroeder. 1960.  Health problems of captive dolphins
 and seals.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 137:534-538.


 Buck, J.D.  1980.  Occurrence of human-associated yeasts in the feces and pool waters of captive bottlenosed
 dolphins. J. Wildlife Dis. 16(1):141-149.


 Buck, J.D., P.M. Bubucis, and S. Spotte. 1988.  Microbiological characterization of three Atlantic whiteside
 dolphins (Lagenorhynchus acutus) from stranding through captivity with subsequent rehabilitation and release
 of one animal.  Zoo Biol. 7:133-138.


 Buck, J.D., NA. Overstrom, G.W. Patton, H.F. Anderson, and J.F. Gorzelany. 1991. Bacteria associated with
 stranded cetaceans from the northeast USA and southwest Florida Gulf coasts. Dis. Aquat. Org. 10:147-152.

 Buck, J.D., L. Shepard, and S. Spotte. 1987.  Clostridium perfringens as the cause of death of a captive Atlantic
 bottlenosed dolphin. J. Wildlife Dis. 23(3): 488-491.


Buck, J.D., and S. Spotte. 1986a. Microbiology of captive white-beaked dolphins  (Lagenorhynchus albirostris)
with comments on epizootics. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 2(4):319-324.


Buck, J.D.,  and S. Spotte. 1986b.  The  occurrence of potentially pathogenic vibrios in marine animals  Mar
Mamm. Sci. 2:319-324.

-------
                                                                                                 70

Calambokidis, J., J. Peard, G.H. Steiger, J.C. Cubbage, and R.L. Belong.  1984. Chemical Contaminants in
Marine Mammals from Washington State. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Ocean Service, Rockvffle, MD. NOAA Tech. Mem. NOS QMS 6. National Technical
Information Service, Springfield, VA, PB84-223601.

Caldwell, D.K., M.C. Caldwell, J.C. Woodward, L. Ajello, W. Kaplan, and H.M. McClure.  1975.  Lobomycosis
as a disease of the Atlantic bottle-nosed dolphin (Tursiops truncates Montagu, 1821). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
24:105-114.

Carroll, J.M., A.M. Jasmin, and JJST. Bascom.  1968.  Pulmonary aspergilliosis of the bottle-nose  dolphin
(Tursiops truncates). Am. J. Vet. Clin. Path. 2:139-140.

Gates, MB., L. Kaufman, J.H. Grabau, J. Pletcher, and J.P. Schroeder. 1986.  Blastomycosis in an Atlantic
bottlenose dolphin.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 189:1148.

Cockcroft, V.G., A.C. Dekock, D.E. Lord,  and GJ.B. Ross.  1989.  Organochlorines hi bottlenose dolphins
Tursiops truncates from the east coast of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 8:207-217.

Colgrove, G.S. 1978. Suspected transportation-associated myopathy in a dolphin.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
173:1121-1123.

Colgrove, G.S., and G. Migaki. 1976. Cerebral abscess associated with stranding in a dolphin. J. Wildlife Dis.
1Z-271-274.

Colgrove, G.S., T.R. Sawa, J.T. Brown, P.F. McDowell, and P.E. Nachtigall.  1975.  Necrotic stomatitis in a
dolphin. J. Wildlife Dis. 11:460-464.

Cowan, D.F., and W.A. Walker.  1979. Disease Factors in Stenella attenuata and Stenella longirostris Taken in
tlte Eastern Tropical Pacific Yellowfin Tuna Purse Seine Fishery.   U.S. Department of Commerce, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine  Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Center, La
Jolla, CA. Admin. Rept. LJ-79-32C.

Cowan, D.F., WA. Walker, and R.L. Brownell, Jr.  1986. Pathology of small cetaceans stranded along southern
California beaches. In Research on Dolphins, ed. M.M. Bryden and  R. Harrison, pp. 323-368. Clarendon Press,
Oxford.

DaLIey, M.D.  1985. Diseases of mammalia: Cetacea. In Diseases of Marine Animals,  Vol. IV, Part 2, ed. O.
Kinne,'pp. 805-847. Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany.

 Dailey, MJD., and R. Stroud.  1978. Parasites and associated pathology observed in cetaceans stranded along
 the Oregon coast.  J. Wildlife Dis. 14:503-511.

 Dailey, MJX, and WA. Walker. 1978. Parasitism as a factor (?) in single strandings of southern California
 cetaceans.  J. Parasitol. 64(4):593-596.

 Deiter, R.L. 1991. Recovery and necropsy of marine mammal carcasses in and near the Point Reyes National
 Seasho're, May 1982-March 1987. In Marine Mammal Strandings in the  United States, ed. J.E. Reynolds III and
 D JC. Odell, pp. 123-141.  U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected
 Resources,'Silver Spring, MD. NOAA Tech.  Rep. NMFS 98.

-------
                                                                                                   71

 Diamond, S.S., D.E. Ewing, and GA.  Caldwell.  1979.  Fatal bronchopneumonia and dermatitis caused by
 Psuedomonas aeruginosa in an Atlantic  bottle-nosed dolphin.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 179:1194-1197.

 Dierauf, LA.  1990.  CRC Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine: Health, Disease and Rehabilitation. CRC
 Press, Boca Raton, FL.

 Domingo, M., J. Visa, M. Pumarola, A J. Marco, L. Ferrer, R. Rabanal, and S. Kennedy.  1992.  Pathologic and
 immunocytochemical studies of morbillivirus infection in striped dolphins (Stenetta coeruleoalba)  Vet  Pathol
 29:1-10.                                                                                     '

 Dunn, J.L., J.D. Buck, and S. Spotte. 1982. Candidiasis in captive cetaceans. J. Am. Vet. Med Assoc 181-1316-
 1321.

 Flom, J.O., and EJ. Houk.  1979.  Morphologic evidence of poxvirus in dolphin tattoo lesion. J. Wildlife Dis
 15:593.

 Foglietta, T.M. 1989.  Mass Mortality of Bottlenose Dolphins in 1987-1988. The Conclusions of the Clinical
 Investigation of the 1987-88 Mass Mortality of the Bottlenose Dolphins Along the United States Central and South
 Atlantic Coasts. May 9-10,  1989. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of-the
 Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, United States House of Representatives. Serial No. 101-20.

 Foley, R.H.  1979.  Osteomyelitis of the  flipper of a bottle-nosed dolphin.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 175:999.

 Fujioka, R.S., S.B. Greco, M.B. Gates, and J.P. Schroeder. 1988.  Vibrio damsela from wounds in bottlenose
 dolphins Tursiops truncatus. Dis. Aquat. Org. 4:1-8.

 Gaskin, DJE,;.1982.  Environmental contaminants and trace elements: Their occurrence and possible significance
 in Cetacea.  In The Ecology of Whales and Dolphins, ed. D.E. Gaskin, pp. 393-433.  Heinemann Educational
 Books, Portsmouth, NH.

 Geraci, J.R. 1979.  The role of parasites in marine mammal strandings along the New England coast. InBiology
 of Marine Mammals: Insights Through Strandings, ed. J.R. Geraci and D J. St. Aubin. Marine Mammal Stranding
 Workshop,  University of Georgia, Athens, 10-12 August  1977, pp. 85-91.  Marine Mammal Commission,
 Washington, DC, Report No. MMC-77/13.

 Geraci,  J.R. 1981.  Dietary disorders in marine mammals: synthesis and new findings. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
Geraci, J.R. 1989. Investigation of the 1987-88 Mass Mortality of Bottlenose Dolphins Along the U.S. Central and
South Atlantic Coast.  Final Report to the National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Navy, Office of Naval
Research, and Marine Mammal Commission, January 1989.

Geraci, J.R. 1990. Sea Mammals and Oil:  Confronting the risks.  Academic Press, San Diego.

Geraci, J.R., M.D. Dailey, and D.J. St. Aubin.  1978a.  Parasitic mastitis in the Atlantic white-sided dolphin,
Lagenorhynchus acutus, as a probable factor in herd productivity.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 35:1350-1355.

Geraci, J.R., and K.E. Gerstmann.  1966.  Relationship of dietary histamine to gastric ulcers in the dolphin. J.
Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 149:884-890.

-------
                                                                                                72
Gcraci,J.R.,B.D. Hicks, and DJ. St. Aubin. 1979. Dolphin pox: A skin disease of cetaceans. Can. J. Comp.
Med. 43:399-404.
Gerad,J.R.,N.C. Palmer, andDJ. St. Aubin. 1987. Tumors in cetaceans: Analysis and new findings. Can.J.
Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44:1289-1300.
Gcrad,JJR.,andS.H.Ridgway.  1991. On disease transmission between cetaceans and humans.  Mar. Mamm.
Sci. 7(2):191-194.
       J R  and D J. St. Aubin, eds. 1979a^ Biology of Marine Mammals: Insights Through Stranding*, Marine
                                     of Georgia, A^-7.MMCo,
rvmri  JR  and DJ  St  Aubin   1979b.  Stress and disease in the marine environment: insights through

Mammal Commission, Washington, DC, Report No. MMC-77/13.
                    St Aubin  1980. Nutritional disorders of captive fish-eating animals.  In The Comparative
                             . RJ- Montali and  G. Migaki, pages 41-49.   Smithsonian InsUtuUon Press,
 Washington, DC.
 Gcraci,J.R., andDJ. St. Aubin.  1982. Study of the Effects of Oil on Cetaceans. Report to the Bureau of Land
 Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
 Gcraci.JJl., andDJ. St. Aubin. 1987. Effects of parasites on marine mammals. Int. J. Parasitol. 17(2):407-414.
 Gcraci,J.R,R.M.Sauer,andW.Medway.  1966.  Erysipelas in dolphins. Am. J. Vet. Re, 27(117):597-606.


 Information Service, Springfield, VA, PB83-289361.
 Granby, K, and C.C. Kinze. 1991.  Organochlorines in Danish and West Greenland  harbor porpoises. Mar.
 Pollut. Bull. 22(9):458-462.
 Greenwood, A.G, and D.C. Taylor. 1977. Clinical and pathological findings in dolphins in 1976. Aquat. Mamm.
 5:34-37.
 Greenwood, A.G., and D.C. Taylor. 1978. Clinical and pathological findings in dolphins in 1977. Aquat. Mamm.
 6:33-38.
 Grcenwood,A.G,andD.C. Taylor. 1979. Clinical and pathological findings in dolphins in 1978. Aquat. Mamm.
 7:71-74.
  FL.

-------
                                                                                                   73

 Hersh, S.L., O.K. Odell, and E.D. Asper.  1990.  Bottlenose dolphin (genus Tursiops) mortality patterns in the
 Indian/Banana River system of Florida. In The Bottlenose Dolphin, ed. S. Leatherwood and R. Reeves, pp. 155-
 164. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

 Heyning, J.E.  1991.  Collecting and archiving of cetacean data and specimens.  In Marine Mammal Standings
 in the United States, ed. I.E. Reynolds III and D.K. Odell, pp. 69-74. U.S. Department of Commerce, National
 Mar. Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MD. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 98.

 Hofmann, R J.  1991.  History, goals, and  achievements of the regional marine mammal stranding networks in
 the United States. In Marine Mammal Standings in the United States, ed. J.E. Reynolds III and D.K. Odell, pp.
 7-15.  U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources  Silver
 Spring, MD. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 98.                                                '

 Howard, E.B., ed.  1983. Pathobiology of Marine Mammal Diseases, Vols. I and II.  CRC Press Boca Raton
 FL.

 Howard, E.B., J.O. Britt,  O.K. Matsumoto, R.  Itahara and C.N.  Nagano.  1983a.  Bacterial diseases.  In
 Pathobiology of Marine Mammal Diseases, Volume I, ed. E.B. Howard, pp. 70-117.  CRC Press, Boca Raton,
 FL.

 Howard, E.B., J.O. Britt,and J.G. Simpson. 1983b. Neoplasms in marine mammals.  In Pathobiology of Marine
 Mammal Diseases, Volume II, ed. E.B. Howard, pp. 95-162. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

 Inskeep, W., C.H. Gardiner, R.K. Harris, J.P.  Dubey, and R.T. Goldston.   1990. Toxoplasmosis in Atlantic
 bottle-nosed dolphins (Tursiops truncates). J. Wildlife Dis. 26 (3):377-382.

 Jenkins, R.L. 1990. Federal legislation governing marine mammals. In Handbook of Marine Mammal Medicine
 ed. LA. Dierauf, pp. 469-482.  CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

 Jones, S.C. III.  1987. Patterns of recent marine mammal strandings along the upper Texas coast. Cetus 7(2):10-
 14.

 Jones, P.  1991a.  What caused dolphin deaths.  Mar. Pollut. Bull. 22(7):317.

 Jones, P.  1991b.  Dolphin epidemic spreads. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 22(12):576.

 Kuehl, D.W., R. Haebler, and C.  Potter.   1991.  Chemical residues in dolphins from the U.S. Atlantic coast
 including Atlantic bottlenose obtained during the 1987/88 mass mortality. Chemosphere 22(11): 1071-1084.

 Lahvis, G.P., R.S. Wells, D. Casper,  and C.S. Via. 1992. In vitro  lymphocyte response of bottlenose dolphins
 (Tursiops truncatus): mitogen induced proliferation. J. Mar Environ. Res. 34: (in press).

 Landy, R.B.  1980. A review of neoplasia m marine mammals (Pinnipedia and Cetacea).  In The Comparative
Pathology of Zoo Animals, ed. RJ. Montali and G. Migaki,  pp. 579-584.   Smithsonian Institution Press
Washington, DC.

Law, RJ., C.F. Fileman, A.D. Hopkins, J.R. Baker, J. Harwood, D.B. Jackson, S. Kennedy, A.R. Martin, and
RJ. Morris.  1991. Concentrations of trace metals in the,Uvers of marine mammals (seals, porpoises and
dolphins) from waters around the British Isles.  Mar. Pollut. Bull. 22(4):183-191.

-------
                                                                                                 74
Lcathcrwood, S., D.K. Caldwell, and H.E. Winn.  1976. Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises of the Western North
ManteTcmde to Their Identification.  NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS CIRC-396. U.S. Government Fruiting
Office, Washington, DC.
Lealherwood, S., R.R. Reeves, W.F. Perrin, and W.E. Evans.  1988.  Whales, Dolphins, and Porpoises of the
Eastern North Pacific and Adjacent Arctic Waters: A Guide to Their Identification.  Dover Publications, Inc.,
Mincola, NY.
LCC.WX BM BelLandJJF.Sutton. 1982. Guidelines for Acquisition and Management of Biological Specimens.
Association of Systematic Collections, Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.

Lillcstolcn, T.I., N. Foster, and S.A. Wise, (in press).  Development of the National Marine Mammal Tissue
Bank. SeL Total Environ.
Mead J G  and C W Potter.  1990. Natural history of bottlenose dolphins along the central Atlantic coast of
thTunited States. "in The Bottlenose Dolphin, ed, S. Leatherwood and R. Reeves, pp. 165-195. Academic Press,
San Diego, CA.
Martin, W.E., OK. Haun, H.S. Barrows, and H. Cravioto. 1970. Nematode damage to brain of striped dolphin,
La&snorliynchus obliquidens.  Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 89:200-205.

 McCarthy, J.F. and L.R. Shugart. 1990.  Biological markers of environmental contamination  In Biomarkers
 o/Entironmental Contaminations, ed. J.F. McCarthy and L.R. Shugart, pp. 3-14. Lew* Publishers, Boca Raton,
 FL.
 Mcdway, W., and H.F. Schryver. 1973.  Respiratory problems in captive small cetaceans.  J. Am. Vet. Med.
 Assoc. 163:571-573.
 Migaki G RJ. Font, W. Kaplan,  and E.D. Asper.  1978a.  Sporotrichosis in a Pacific wKite-sided dolphin
 (Lagenrohyndtus obliquidens).  Am. J. Vet. Res. 39(12):1916-1919.

 Migaki, G., R.D. Gunnels, and H.W. Casey. 1978b. Pulmonary cryptococcus in an Atlantic bottle-nosed dolphin
 (Tursiops truncatus). Lab. Animal Sci.  28:603-606.

 Migaki, G, T.R. Sawa, and J.P. Dubey.  1990. Fatal disseminated toxoplasmosis in a spinner dolphin (Stenella
 lon&'rostris'). Vet. Pathol. 27:463-464.

 Migaki, G., M.G. Valerio, B A. Irvine, and F.M. Garner. 1971a.  Lobo's disease in an Atlantic bottle-nosed
 dolphin. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 149:578-582.

 Migaki, G., D. van Dyke, and R. C. Hubbard. 1971b. Some histopathological lesions caused by helminths in
 marine mammals. J. Wildlife Dis. 7:281-189.

 Migaki, G., J.C. Woodard and R.T. Goldston.  1978c.   Renal adenoma in an Atlantic bottle-nosed dolphin
  (Tursiops truncatus). Am. J. Vet. Res. 39:1920-1921.

  Nakeeb, S., S.P. Targowski, and S. Spotte. 1977.  Chronic cutaneous candidiasis in bottle-nosed dolphins. J. Am.
  Vet. MedfAssoc. 149:578-582.

  NMFS  1990. Disposition of tissues from stranded marine mammals (proposed rule). National Marine Fisheries
  Service', NOAA, Department of Commerce,  Fed. Regist, Dec. 20, 1990, 55(245):52194-52196.

-------
                                                                                                   75

 NMFS. 1991a. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Identification of candidate species for listing
 under the Endangered Species Act. National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Department of Commerce, Fed.
 Regist., June 11, 1991, 56(112):26797-26798.

 NMFS.  1991b.  Depletion of the coastal-migratory stock of bottlenose dolphins in the U.S. Mid-Atlantic
 (proposed rule). National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Department of Commerce, Fed. Regist., August
 15, 1991, 56(158):40594-40596.

 NMFS. 1991c.  Disposition of tissues from stranded marine mammals (final rule). National Marine Fisheries
 Service, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce, Fed. Regist., Aug. 20, 1991, 56(161):41304-41309.

 NMFS. 1992a. National Marine Mammal Tissue Bank and Stranding Program, Program Development Plan.
 NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, Silver
 Spring, MD.  October 1992.                                       »           -       '

 NMFS. 1992b. Report on Investigation of 1990 Gulf of Mexico Bottlenose Dolphin Standings.  L.J. Hansen,
 coordinator.  U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service,  Southeast Fisheries Science
 Center, Miami FL, Contribution MIA-92/93, November 1992.

 Odell, D.K.  1987. The mystery of marine mammal strandings. Cetus 7(2):2-6.

 Perrin, W.F., E.D. Mitchell, J.G. Mead, D.K. Caldwell, M,C. Caldwell, P J.H. van Bree, and W.H. Dawbin. 1987.
 Revision of the spotted dolphins, Stenella spp.  Mar. Mamm. Sci. 3(2):99-170.

 Potter, C.W.  1991.  Marine mammals.  In Virginia's Endangered Species: Proceedings of a Symposium, ed. K.
 Terwilh'ger, pp. 603-616.  The McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, VA.

 Pryor, K. and K.S. Norris.  1991.  Dolphin Societies: Discoveries and Puzzles.  University of California Press,
 Berkeley.

 Rawson, RJ., H.F. Anderson, G.W. Patton, and T. Beecher.  1991.  Anthracosis in the Atlantic bottlenose
 dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Mar. Mamm. Sci. 7(4):413-416.

 Ray, S., B.P. Dunn, J.F. Payne, L. Fancey, R. Helbig, and P. Beland.  1991. DNA-carcinogen adducts in beluga
 whales from the Canadian Arctic and Gulf of St. Lawrence.  Mar. Pollut. Bull. 22(8):392-396.

 Reijnders, PJ.H.  1986.  Perspectives for studies of pollution hi cetaceans. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 17(2):58-5&

 Reijnders, PJ.H.  1988. Ecotoxicological perspectives in marine mammalogy: Research principles and goals for
 a conservation policy. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 4:91-102.

 Reynolds, J.E. III, and D.K. Odell, eds. 1991.  Marine mammal strandings in the United States, Proceedings of
 the Second Marine Mammal Stranding Workshop, Miami, Florida, 3-5 December  1987.  U.S. Department of
 Commerce,  National Marine Fisheries Service,  Office of  Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MD.  NOAA
 Technical Report NMFS 981. January  1991.

Ridgway, S.H., ed.  1972.  Mammals of the Sea, Biology and Medicine.  Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

Ridgway, S., and M. Dailey. 1972. Cerebral and cerebellar involvement of trematode parasites in dolphins and
their possible role in  stranding. J. Wildlife Dis. 8:33-43.

-------
                                                                                                  76

Ridgway, SJH., and D.G. Johnston.  1965.  Two interesting disease cases in wild cetaceans.  Am. J. Vet. Res.
26:771-775.

Risebrough, R W 1978. Pollutants in Marine Mammals, a Literature Review and Recommendations for Research.
Marine Mammal Commission, Washington, DC., November 1978.  National Technical Information Service,
Springfield, VA, PB-290728.

Rommel, S A., WA. McClellan, C.W. Potter, J.G. Mead, and DA. Pabst. 1991. Characterizing a whole dolphin:
A new protocol. In Abstracts, Ninth Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals, Chicago, IL, 3-5
December 1991, p. 58.

Schrocder, J.P., J.G. Wallace, M.B. Gates, S.B.  Greco,  and P.W.B. Moore.  1985.  An infection by Vibrio
al&nolyticus in an Atlantic bottlenose dolphin in an open ocean pen. J. Wildlife Dis. 21:437-438.

Schroeder, RJ., CA.  Delli Quadri, R.W. Mclntyre, and WA. Walker.   1973.  Marine mammal disease
surveillance program hi Los Angeles County.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 163:580.

Schryver, H.C., W. Medway, and J.F. Williams. 1967. The stomach fluke, Braunina cordiformis, in the Atlantic
bottle-nosed dolphin.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 151:884-886.

Scott GP andDM Burn 1987. The Potential Impact of'the 1987Mass Mortality on the Mid-Atlantic Off-Shore
Stock of Bottlenose Dolphins.  Contribution CRD-87/88-10, Miami Laboratory, Coastal Fishery Resources
Division, Southeast Fisheries  Center, National  Marine Fisheries Service, Miami, FL. December 1987.

Scott GJP  DM  Burn, and  LJ. Hansen.  1988.  The dolphin dieoff: Long-term effects and recovery of the
population? In Proceedings of the Oceans '88 Conference, Baltimore, MD,  31 October - 2 November 1988, pp.
819-823.

Scott M D  R S Wells, and A.B. Irvine. 1990. A long-term study of bottlenose dolphins on the west coast of
Florida, "in" The Bottlenose Dolphin, ed. S. Leatherwood and R.R. Reeves, pp. 235-244. Academic Press, Inc.,
San Diego,  CA.

Scibold, H.R., and J.E. Neal.  1956.  Erysipelothrix septicemia in the porpoise. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 128:537-
539.
Simpson, C.F., F.G. Wood, and F. Young. 1958.  Cutaneous lesions on a porpoise with erysipelas. J. Am. Vet.
 Med. Assoc. 133:558-560.

 Simpson  J  G  and L.H. Cornell.  1983. Diseases associated with stranding and captivity.  In Pathobiology of
Marine Mammal Diseases, Vol. II, ed. E.B. Howard, pp. 1-127.  CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

 Smith, A.W., and P.M. Boyt. 1990. Caliciviruses of ocean origin: A review.  J. Zoo and Wildlife Med. 21(1):3-
 23.

 Smith, A.W., D.E. Skilling,  and  S. Ridgway.  1983a.  Calicivirus-induced vesicular disease in cetaceans and
 probable interspccics  transmission. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 183(11):1223-1225.

 Smith, A.W., D.E. Skilling, S.H. Ridgway, and  CA. Fenner. 1983b.  Regression of cetacean tattoo lesions
 concurrent with conversion of precipitation antibody against a pox virus.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 183(11).1219-
 1222.

-------
                                                                                                    77

  Smith, A.W., NA. Vedros, T.G. Akers, and W.G. Gilmartin.  1978. Hazards of disease t-ansfer from marine
  to land mammals: Review and recent findings.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 173:1131-1133.

  Smith, H.L., Jr.  1990.  Another hypothesis about dolphin deaths. Am. Soc. Microbiol. News 56:249.

  Streitfeld, M.M.,  and C.G. Chapman.  1976.  Staphylococcus aureus infections of captive dolphins (Tursiops
  truncatus) and oceanarium personnel.  Am. J. Vet. Res. 37:303-305.

  Sweeny, J.C., G. Migaki, P.M. Vainik, and R.H. Conklin. 1976. Systemic mycosis in marine mammals. J. Am.
  Vet. Med. Assoc.  169:946-948.
  Sweeney, J.C., and S.H. Ridgway.   1975.  Common diseases of small cetaceans.  J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.
  167:533-549.

  Tanabe, S., T. Mori, and R. Tatsukawa. 1983. Global pollution of marine mammals by PCBs, DDTs and HCHS
  (BHCS). Chemosphere 12(9/10):1269-1275.

  Tanabe, S., R. Tatsukawa, K. Maruyana, and N.  Miyazaki.   1982.  Transplacental  transfer of PCBs and
  chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides from the pregnant striped dolphin (Sterella coemleoalba) to her fetus. Agric.
  Biol. Chem. 46(5):1249-1254

  Tanabe, S., S. Watanabe, and H. Kan.  1988.  Capacity and mode of PCB metabolism in small cetaceans.  Mar.
_Mamm. Sci. 4(2):103-124.

  Tangredi, B.P., and W. Medway. 1980.  Post-mortem isolation  of Vibrio alginolyticus from an Atlantic white-
  sided dolphin, Lagenorhynchus acutus. J. Wildlife Dis. 16:329-331.

  Tucker and Associates, Inc. 1990. Sea Turtles and Marine Mammals of the Gulf of Mexico.  Proceedings of a
  workshop, 1-3 August 1989, New Orleans, Louisiana. Minerals Management Service, Metairie, LA.  December
  1990. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA,  PB91-183103.

  Walker, WA., F.G. Hochberg, and E.S.  Hacker.   1984.   The Potential  Use  of  the Parasites Crassicauda
  (Nematoda) and Nasitrema (Platyhelminthes) as Biological Tags and Their Role in the Natural Mortality of
  Common Dolphins, Delphinus delphis, in the Eastern North Pacific. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest
  Fisheries Center, La Jolla, CA. Admin. Rep. No. LJ-84-08C.

  Walsh, M.T., D. Beusse, G.D. Bossart, W.G. Young, D.K. Odell, and G.W. Patton.  1988. Ray encounters as
  a mortality factor in Atlantic bottlenose dolphins {Tursiops truncatus).  Mar. Mammal Sci. 4:154-162.

  Waring, G.H. 1992. Survey of Federally-Funded Marine Mammal Research and Studies FY 74-91. Final Report
  for Marine Mammal Commission contract T75136103. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA,
  PB92-190222.

  Weeks, BA., D.P. Anderson, AJP. DuFour, A. Fairbrother, A.J. Goven, G.P. Lahvis, and G. Peters.   1992.
  Immunological biomarkers to assess environmental stress.  In Biomarkers: Biochemical, Physiological,  and
  Histological Markers of Anthropogenic Stress, ed. R J. Huggett, R A. Kimerle,  P.M. Mehrle, Jr., and  H.L.
  Bergman, pp. 211-234.  Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.

  Wells, R.S.  1991.  The role of long-term study in understanding the social structure of a bottlenose dolphin
  community. In Dolphin Societies: Discoveries and Puzzles, ed. K.  Pryor and K.S. Norris, pp. 199-225.  University
  of California Press, Berkeley.

-------
                                                                                               78

Wilkinson, D.M.  1991.  Program Review of the Marine Mammal Stranding Networks.  Report to: Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. May 1991.

Woodard,J.C.,S.G.2am,D.K.Caldwell,andM.C.Caldwell. 1969. Some parasitic diseases of dolphins. Pathol.
Vet. 6:257-272.

-------
     APPENDIX A
DATA TO BE COLLECTED

-------

-------
                                                                                                       81
Level A Data: Basic minimum data from all stranding events
(to be submitted to the National Office)
  1.


  2.
  3.
 4.
 5.


 6.



 7.


 8.


 9.
 Investigator
     — name,
     — address (institution)
 Reporting source

 Species
     — preliminary identification (by qualified personnel)
     — voucher (supporting  material)
          a) photograph—full lateral view (cetaceans); dorsal view (pinnipeds); dorsal, lateral, ventral views of whole
             carcass, with close-up of head (when possible). Include a card with field number in  each photo.
          b) specimens—canine tooth or entire mandible (pinnipeds); 2 pieces of midrow baleen, or faulla if baleen
             missing (mysticetes), tooth counts and samples, or entire skull for difficult species (odontocetes).
 Field number

'Number of Animals
     — total
     — sub-groups (fragmented mass stranding)
 Location
     — preliminary description (local designation)
     — latitude and longitude (to 0.1 minute, if possible) with closest named cartographical feature (USGS 1: 250,000
        series) as determined subsequently in the lab.
 Date, time
     — first discovery
     — of data and specimen recovery
 Length .(Girth and Weight, when possible)
     a)  cetaceans and sirenians—tip of rostrum to fluke notch
     b)  pinnipeds—tip of rostrum to tip of tail, lying on back.

Condition—recorded for bodi discovery and recovery times. Categories as follows-
     1)  alive
     2)  freshly dead (i.e. edible)
     3)  decomposed,  but organs basically intact
     4)  advanced decomposition (i.e.  organs not recognizable, carcass intact)
     5)  mummified or skeletal remains  only
10.  Sex
         a) cetaceans—probe genital slit (anteriorly directed are female, posteriorly directed are male)
         b) pinnipeds—position of apertures
         c) sirenians
                                From Appendix A, Hofmann (1991)

-------
                                                                                                   82
Level B Data: Supplementary onsite information
(Augments data' on life history and the stranding event)

1,   Weather and tide conditions

2.   Orientation of carcasses
3.   Offshore human/predator activity

4.   Presence of prey species

5,   Behavior
        — pre-stranding
        — stranding (on beach)
        — after return to sea

6.   Samples collected for subsequent analysis
        A. Age Determination
             a) odontocetes—4-5 adjacent teeth from the middle of the left lower tooth row.
             b) mysticetes—minimum of one ear/plug, preferably in situ in a sample of externalauditory meatus, or
                in a glove finger.
             c) pinnipeds—minimum of 1 canine tooth - claw
             d) sirenians—tusk, where present
        B. Reproductive Tracts
             a) females—both ovaries, uterus, fetus (if any) and measurements and samples of mammary glands.
             b) males—one testicle with epididymis, or samples with weights and measurements, baculum (when pres-
                ent),  vas deferens.
        C. Stomach Contents
             — weigh contents, if possible
             — preserve in alcohol (never in formalin)
             — freeze whole, if possible

7.  Disposition of carcass
                                    From Appendix A, Hofmann (1991)

-------
                                                                                                        83
Level C Data: Necropsy Examination and Parasite Collection

1.   Necropsy
        Precise recording of findings and appropriate preservation of tissue are of great importance to an understanding
        of disease conditions. The most important characteristics of an abnormality are its SIZE and LOCATION  Also
        important are features such as COLOR, TEXTURE, and SHAPE, as well as the nature of the transition from
        normal to abnormal tissue, that is,  whether the boundaries are sharp or vague. All findings are described in
        STANDARD ENGLISH using NON-TECHNICAL TERMS. Lesions are described using terms such as raised,
        flat,  depressed, rough,  smooth, velvety, warty, yellowish, round, irregular, etc. Photographs should be made
        whenever  possible, and should  include a ruler or some other non-ambiguous reference object.
             External Examination—
                Describe all unusual features such as marks, abrasions, parasites;  examine mouth and teeth, etc.
             Internal Examination—
                Samples are to be taken routinely from all organs including brain, muscle, endocrine glands and viscera.
                When an organ is normal, a random section should be preserved in formalin. Any abnormality should
                be sampled with an adjacent piece of normal tissue. If an organ is: studded with many discrete lesions,
                all apparently identical, sample only two or three. Describe organs as normal appearing, if that is the
                case.  Vessels and ducts are normally opened throughout their length. While this is in theory desirable
                for the intestine, sampling of two or three tubular sections may be adequate. AH  major organs are
                weighed after cleaning of excess fat and extraneous tissue.  Large organs are weighed in pieces,  and'
                the partial weights added. Hearts are normally weighed with a short cuff of aorta.

        Preservation of Tissue                                          ,
            Formalin (10% neutral buffered) is the standard fixative. Tissue taken for histology  should be fixed in for-
            malin of a volume 20 times the volume of tissue. Tissues should be sliced thin—about 3 mm. Other dimen-
            sions  are not critical; 3x3 cm is a convenient size. Larger pieces of tissue  do not fix  well.
                Whole lesions, e.g., stomach ulcer, may be taken and fixed, with good results as the wall of the organ
            is thin. When possible cysts and cavities in tissue, pus-filled lesions and fluid  found in body cavity should
            be cultured for bacteria. Commercial holding media are excellent for the purpose, and their use is recom-
            mended. Special requests for research material such as whole organ preparations should only be honored
            if accompanied by detailed protocols.

        Collection of Toxicology Specimens                                                 •
            Tissue samples collected for pesticide and heavy metal analyses may be wrapped in aluminum foil or placed
            in plastic bags.  For prolonged storage, glass containers with teflon-lined lids are recommended. The samples
            should be  frozen as soon as possible, but may be transported on ice without significant loss of residues.
                Samples of blubber, brain, liver, kidney and muscle should be collected routinely. Single assays may
            be performed with as little as 10-20 g of tissue, but samples weighing 200 g  or more are necessary for a
            complete spectrum of analyses.
                                   From Appendix A, Hofmann (1991)

-------
                                                                                                          84
•>   Parasite Collection
        Parasites may be found anywhere within the body, but problem areas are identified as follows:
            Head
                —  sinuses
                —  ears
                —  brain
            Skin,  Blubber
            Muscle, Fascia
            G.  I.  Tract
                —  including fecal sample
                —  liver,  gallbladder, duct
                —  pancreas, duct
            Respiratory
                —  major airways (opened)
                —  lungs
            Uro-genital
                 —  kidneys
                 —  genital organs
                 — ureters, bladder
             Blood
                 — sample or smear

         Fixatives
             A) Alcohol-Formalin Acetic Acid (AFA)-40 mL of 70% alcohol,  10 mL of 5 % formalin, 2 mL of acetic
                acid, 48 mL of distilled water
             B) Glycerin-Alcohol—5 mL of glycerin in 95 mL of 70% alcohol
             C) Potassium Bichromate—2% aqueous
             D) Formalin—5% solution
             E) Ethanol—70% solution

         Sampling Procedures
             — subsample when large numbers are present
             — do  not distort
             — ensure collection of head and tail
             — sample portion of infected tissue when a parasite reaction is observed.  Fix m A if possible
             — measure and photograph, when possible

             1) Nematodes
                     — fix in hot (16°C, 60° F) fixative B or
                     — place in tap water in cooler for 12 hours, then fix in  solution A
             2) Trematodes, Cestodes, Acanthacephalans
                     — place in tap water in cooler for 12 hours, then fix in  solution A
             3) Lice,  Mites, Copepods, Barnacles
                     — fix in either D or E
             4) Stool  Sample
                     — preserve in fixative C
                                        From Appendix A, Hofmann (1991)

-------
                                                                                           85
 MARINE MAMMAL STRANDING REPORT
                                             OMB#0648-0178, expires 01/31/94
                                                              SIDtt
 FIELD NO. :
                                     NMFS REGISTRATION NO.
                                                                                  (NMFS OSE)
 COMMON NAME:.

 OBSERVER
 Name:	
                 GENUS:
                                                            SPECIES:
                     Agency:.
                                                      Phone:
 Address:
 LOCATION
 State:	
County:.
 City:
 Locality Details:
 * Latitude:.
 * Longitude:.
TYPE OF OCCURRENCE
Mass Stranding:  (Yes) /  (No)  # Animals.
Human Interaction:  (Yes) /  (No) /  (?)
 Check one: 	1. Boat collision
            	2. Shot
            	4. Fishery interaction
              5. Other	
                                       How determined:
                                    Other Causes (if known):.
 DATE OF INITIAL OBSERVATION:
 Ifr 	 Mo 	 Day 	..
 CONDITION:  Check one:	1.Alive
                      	2.Fresh dead
                      	3.Moderate decomp.
                      	4.Advanced decomp.
                      	5.Mummified
                        ? Unknown
                               DATE OF EXAMINATION:
                               Yr    '	 Mo 	
                                      Day
                               CONDITION: Check one:	1.Alive
                                                    	2 .Fresh dead
                                                    	3 . Mode ra te de comp.
                                                    	4 .Advanced decomp.
                                                    	5.Mummified
                                                      ? Unknown
 LIVE ANIMAL -  Condition and Disposition:
 3ieck one  	l.Released at site
   or more:  	2.Sick
            	3.Inj ured
            	4.Died
            	5.Euthanized
            	6.Rehabilitated and released
             ? Unknown
                               TAGS APPLIED?:  (Yes) /  (No)
                               TAGS PRESENT?:  (Yes) /  (No)
                                           Dorsal
                                 Left
Right
 Pransported to:
 (Died)  / (Released)  Date:.
                               Tag No. (s) :.

                               Color(s) :

                               Type:
                               Placement
                               Front/Reaar Front/Rear
 ZARCASS  -  Disposition,  check one:
 rheck one:  	l.Left  at  site
            	2.Buried
              3.Towed
            	4.Sci.  collection (see below)
            	S.Edu.  collection (see below)
            _1_6.Other 	;	
           	? Unknown
 reCROPSIED?  (Yes)  /  (No)
                                  MORPHOLOGICAL DATA:
                                  Sex - Check one: 	I.Male
                                                   	2.Female
                                                     ? Unknown
                                  Straight Length:.

                                  *Weight:	
                                      .(cm)/(in)/test)
                                                                   .(kg)/(lb)/(est?)
                                                 PHOTOS TAKEN?  (Yes)  / (No)
REMARKS:
DISPOSITION OF TISSUE/SKELETAL MATERIAL:
•Record data if available
                                           It is estimated that completion
                                           of this form requires 20 minutes.

-------

-------
      APPENDIX B
EXTENDED BIBLIOGRAPHY

-------

-------
                                                                                                  89
                                    EXTENDED BIBLIOGRAPHY
 Anderson, D.M., and A.W. White. 1990. Toxic Dinoflagettates and Marine Mammal Mortalities. Proceedings
 of Expert  Consultation held at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.  Final Report for Marine Mammal
 Commission contract T6810848-1.  National Technical Information Service, PB90-160755, Springfield, VA.

 Bossart, G.D., M.T. Walsh,  D.K. Odell, J.D.  Lynch,  D.O.  Beusse, R. Friday, and W.G. Young.  1991.
 Histopathologic findings of a mass stranding of pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus).  In Marine Mammal
 Standings  in the United States, ed. J.E. Reynolds III and D.K. Odell, pp. 85-90. U.S. Department of Commerce,
 National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MD. NOAATech Rep NMFS
 98.

 Britt, J.O., and E.B. Howard.  1983a.  Anatomic variants of marine mammals.  In Pathbbiology of Marine
 Mammal Diseases, Volume I, ed. E.B. Howard, pp. 7-46. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

 Britt, J.O., and E.B.  Howard.  1983b. Virus diseases.  In Pathobiology of Marine Mammal Diseases, Volume I
 ed. E.B. Howard, pp. 47-67. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

 Britt, J.O.,  and E.B. Howard.  1983c.  The hematopoietic system. In Pathobiology of Marine Mammal Diseases,
 Volume H, ed. E.B. Howard, pp. 65-78.  CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

 Bryden, M.M., and R. Harrison.  1986.  Research on Dolphins. Oxford University Press, New York.

 Caldwell, O.K. and M.C. Caldwell (eds.).  1968. Proceedings of the Second Symposium in Disease'and Husbandry
 of Aquatic  Mammals. Marineland Research Laboratory, Marineland, FL.

 Ching, H.L.,  and E.S. Robinson.  1959.  Two campulid trematodes fronf a new  host, the harbor porpoise.  J.
 Parasitol. 45:181.

 Cowan, D.F., and WA. Walker. 1979. Disease Factors in Stenella attenuata and Stenella longkostris Taken in
 the Eastern Tropical  Pacific Yellowfin Tuna Purse Seine Fishery.  U.S. Department of Commerce, National
 Oceanic and  Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Center, La
 Jolla, California, Admin. Rept. LJ-79-32C.

 Fossi, M.C., L. Marsili, C. Leonzio, G.N. DiSciara, M. Zanardelli, and S. Focardi.  1992.  The use of non-
 destructive  biomarker in Mediterranean cetaceans:  preliminary data on MFO activity in skin biopsy  Mar
 Pollut. Bull. 24(9):459-461.                                                                      .

 Geraci, J.R.  1990. Sea Mammals and Oil: Confronting the Risks. San Diego: Academic Press.  282 pp.

 Geraci, J.R., and D.J. St. Aubin. 1982. Study of the Effects of Oil on Cetaceans. Report to the Bureau of Land
 Management, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.

 Hersh, S.L. 1989.  Why the dolphins died: The answer-to date. Sea Frontiers 35(4):246-247.

 Heyning, J.E.  1987.  Stranded cetaceans: What the biological data are telling us.  Cetus 7(2):7-9.

Hinshaw, V.S., WJ. Bean, J. Geraci, P. Fioreffi, G. Early, and R.G. Webster. 1986.  Characterization of two
influenza A viruses from a pilot whale. J. Virology 58(2):655-656.

-------
                                                                                                90

Hoshima, T., and Y. Sigiura. 1956. On a sldn disease and a nematode parasite of a dolphin, Tursiops truncates.
Sci. Rep.'Whales Res. Inst. 11:133-138.

Howard, E.B. 1983. Miscellaneous diseases. "La. Pathobiology of Marine Mammal Diseases, Volume II, ed. E.B.
Howard' pp. 164-225. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Howard, E.B., J.O. Britt, and GJK. Matsumoto. 1983.  Parasitic diseases.  In Pathobiology of Marine Mammal
Diseases, Volume I, ed. EJB. Howard, pp. 119-232.  CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Kennedy, S., 3A. Smyth, P.F. Cash, M. McAliskey, S J. McCollough, and B.K. Rima. 1991. Histopathologic and
immunocytochemical studies of distemper in harbor porpoises. Vet. Pathol. 28:1-7.

Kennedy, S., JA. Smyth, S J. McCollough, G.M. Allan, and S. McQuaid. 1988.  Viral distemper now found in
porpoises.  Nature 336:21.

Leatherwood, S., and R.R. Reeves. 1990.  The Bottlenose Dolphin. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.

Migaki, G., and SJR. Jones. 1983. Mycotic diseases in marine mammals.  In Pathobiology of Marine Mammal
Diseases, Volume II, ed. E.B. Howard, pp. 1-127.  CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Odell, D.K. 1987. The mystery of marine mammal strandings. Cetus 7(2):2-6.

Odell, D.K., E£>. Asper, J. Baucom, and L.H. Cornell.  1980.  A recurrent mass stranding of the  false killer
whale, Pseudorca crassidens, in Florida. Fish. Bull. 78(1):171-176.

PreaiLC  andR  Duguy  1989.  Pathologic cardiaque dans un echantillon de dauphins echou6s sur les cotes de
France (Heart pa'thology in dolphins stranded on the coasts of France). In French, English summary. Mammalia
53{3):441-449.

Ridgway,S.H. 1968. The bottle-nosed dolphin in biomedical research. In Methods of Animal Experimentation,
Volume's, cd.W.I. Gay,  pp. 387-446. Academic Press, New York.

Ridgway, S.H., ed. 1972. Mammals of the Sea, Biology and Medicine.  Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

Schimpff, R.D.,  and N.R. Hall.  1979. Neuropathology in relation to strandings: Captive and single  stranded
 cetaceans (Abstract). In Biology of Marine Mammals: Insights Through Strandings, ed J R. Geraa and DJ. St.
Aubin, pp. 234-235.  Marine Mammal Commission, Washington, DC, Report No. MMC-77/13.

 Walsh, M.T., D.O. Beusse, W.G. Young, J.D. Lynch,  E.D. Asper, and O.K. Odell. 1991.  Medical findings in
 a mass stranding of pilot  whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus) in Florida. In Marine Mammal S^ndmgsm the
 United States, cd. jl Reynolds HI and D.K. Odell, pp. 75-83. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine
 Fisheries Sertfce, Office of Protected Resources, Silver Spring, MD, NOAA Techmcal Report NMFS 981.

 Williams, E.H., Jr., AA. Mignucci-Giannoni, L. Bunkley-Williams, and B. Pinto-Rodriguez  1989.  Prediction
 of apossible major marine ecological disturbance of the Atlantic spotted dolphin,  (unpublished manuscnpt)
                                                              U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:  1993 - 750-002/80263

-------