United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Water Engineering
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati OH 45268
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-86/069 Sept. 1986
<&EPA          Project  Summary
                    Field  Investigation  of
                    Biological  Toilet  Systems  and
                    Grey  Water  Treatment
                    K. M. Enferadi, R. C. Cooper, S. C. Goranson, A. W. Olivieri,
                    J. H. Poorbaugh, M. Walker, and B. A. Wilson
                     Operational characteristics and over-
                   all acceptability were determined for
                   popular models of biological toilets and
                   a few select grey water systems. A field
                   observation scheme was devised to
                   take advantage of in-use sites through-
                   out the State of California. Field
                   performance was recorded monthly on
                   forms developed to record site condi-
                   tions such as pile temperatures, odors,
                   and vector observations. Samples of
                   the decomposition chamber pile and
                   the end products were taken for labora-
                   tory analyses that included both physi-
                   cal and microbiological parameters.
                   Grey water influent and effluent were
                   also analyzed.
                     A health risk assessment was per-
                   formed  concurrently using environ-
                   mental health experts to estimate the
                   probability of a significant failure for a
                   particular onsite waste treatment and
                   disposal system. The  health  experts
                   used  an objective decision-making
                   technique that may be used by regula-
                   tory officials to evaluate new technolo-
                   gies where there is an absence of defini-
                   tive test information. This assessment
                   results in a probability that is expressed
                   in relation to the estimated risk of a
                   known system, the septic tank/soil ab-
                   sorption system.
                     Model frameworks for education and
                   surveillance monitoring are presented.
                   Since the user may need guidance dur-
                   ing siting and  operation and in the
                   event of system failures, third-party
                   management is strongly advised.
                      This Project Summary was devel-
                   oped by EPA's Water Engineering Re-
search Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH, to
announce key findings of the research
project that is fully documented in a
separate report of the same title (see
Project Report ordering information at
back).

Introduction
  This study was undertaken to assess
performance characteristics,  operation
and maintenance problems, and health
risks for seven types of non-water-
carriage  toilets and associated grey
water treatment systems. The biological
toilet systems assessed  through field
studies included home-built  and com-
mercially available designs. Grey water
treatment systems were generally vari-
able in design and were essentially
those associated with the  biological toi-
let systems chosen for study.
  The health risk assessment  technique
used in the study relied on the judgment
of two tiers of experts in the field of pub-
lic health to assess the relative risk of an
unknown system compared  with a
known system performing under simi-
lar conditions.
  The study was initiated to address the
potential public health problems posed
by the increasing popularity of biologi-
cal toilets and grey water treatment and
disposal  systems among ecologically
concerned individuals in California and
elsewhere in the United States.
Experimental Procedures
  The site  selection process began in
February 1978 when all local directors
of environmental health  in California's
58 counties were contacted and invited

-------
to participate. Systems were selected in
10 counties, and monitoring was com-
pleted in the following 8: Calaveras,
Humboldt, Kern, Marin,  Mendocino,
Monterey, Nevada, and Sonoma. An ef-
fort was made to obtain representative
systems in as many varying environ-
mental and physical situations as possi-
ble, but all sites and units were to meet
the following criteria:
  1. Units  were officially recognized
     and in compliance with  existing
     local  requirements of county
     health departments  and/or local
     regulatory bodies.
  2. Units were slated for year-round
     use.
  3. Occupants were willing to allow a
     year of unit monitoring.
  4. County  health officials and  site
     owners agreed on the liability  and
     confidentiality of the  study.
  The units selected under these criteria
were subject to monthly  visits by the
field  staff, who were either county
health sanitarians or project staff from
the  Department of Health  Services
(DOHS). As the study progressed, the
number of units monitored monthly
varied. This variation resulted from site
inaccessibility (especially during winter
months),  withdrawal of  site owners
from the study, absence of occupants
on the day of inspection, inconsistent or
seasonal use of units by the occupants,
discontinuation  of unit use  during
change of occupants, or failure of the
field investigator to perform.
  The most  rigorous  sampling took
place between  August 1979 and June
1980, when laboratory services were
available to  the project.  Six  units in
Marin  County were added  in August
1979, and another three  units in Cala-
veras County were added  in  November
1979.  The type of laboratory work
ordered  for  each  site was predeter-
mined in an effort to develop  informa-
tion about  all system types. Analytical
results were generally  not available to
project staff for 3 to 5 months after sam-
pling and thus did not influence choices
until the last few months, when an effort
was made to follow up earlier findings.
Table 1 summarizes the types and num-
ber of systems examined during  the
data collection phase.
  The  objective of the field  sampling
and monitoring work was to obtain as
much information as possible on the
operation and performance of the se-
lected  systems and on  the  biological,
physical, and chemical  aspects of the
stored excreta solids, liquid, and grey
Table 1.    Systems Examined from February 1979 through June 1980

             Type of Toilet                                 No. Examined
Waterless Toilets:

   Large, sloped fiberglass toilets

   Large, sloped plastic toilets

   Box-like humus toilet with topping bar

   Box-like humus toilet with rotor

   Vault privy

   Pit privy

   Drum toilet

   Total


Grey Water Systems:

   Septic tank

   Proprietary settling tank

   Single medium filter

   Dual media filter

   No treatment

   Total
                      32




                       7

                       2

                       1

                       2

                       3
water collection and treatment over a
12-month period  (i.e., systems' per-
formance over the four seasons). No at-
tempt was made to control the amount
of usage of the units by the  occupants
or to influence the users'  decisions
about operating and maintenance prac-
tices.
  All persons involved in the  routine
sampling and monitoring were  individ-
ually instructed on their first site visit by
the field biologist and/or the project di-
rector to standardize the data collection
activities as much as possible. To facili-
tate accurate and uniform recording of
observations and data at each site visit,
personnel were provided with  written
instructions and a field survey form de-
signed by project staff.


Data and Sample Collection
from Waterless  Toilets

Observation  of  Site and Unit
Conditions
  Upon arriving at the  site, the field in-
vestigators noted  wind direction and
speed. Moving  upwind toward the unit,
they recorded any odor associated with
the toilets at distances of 100 and 50 ft
from the toilet vent stack and at the res-
idence.  Distinction was made between
hydrogen  sulfide  and ammonia odors.
The investigators  then interviewed the
occupants concerning  general and
specific details of the  unit operation,
problems, and extent of  use. Entering
the bathroom  or privy house,  they
noted the presence of any odor at the
toilet port and looked for signs of exces-
sive numbers of flies or other insects in
the room.
  At the vault of the unit, investigators
recorded signs of spillage, leakage, vec-
tor invasion, and odors. The access port
was opened, and the inside of the  vault
was examined  by flashlight for
arthropods. Odors within the vault were
noted along with  distribution of accu-
mulated solids and liquids, leaks, struc-
tural problems, etc.
  Temperatures were taken at the cen-
ter and at the edge of the solids pile,
each at one-half the depth of the pile. In
units with separation of fresh and de-
composed solids, temperatures  were
taken in each pile.  For units with heating
coils, an additional  reading was made
near the coil.

-------
  To determine solids  pH in the field,
investigators used non-bleeding Color-
pHast* indicator strips  with pH ranges
of 4.0 to 7.0 and 6.5 to 10.0. The status of
solids  decomposition  was described
based on particle  size  and  uniformity,
color, and distribution of moisture.
  Before closing the vault, investigators
took samples of solids for submission to
the Berkeley  laboratories of the DOHS,
and they replaced the exposed sticky fly
tapes and cockroach traps with new
ones.

 Observations and Sampling
 of Arthropods
   During each site visit, investigators
 collected representative specimens of
 insects, spiders, mites,  and other
 arthropods associated with the units.
 Flying insects were taken with an insect
 net. Arthropods crawling on the solids
 and vault walls were picked up with for-
 ceps or a camel's hair artist's brush
 moistened with  alcohol. The  presence
 of mites or other arthropods on or in the
 immediate area  of  the  toilet seat or
 kitchen  port (if installed)  was deter-
 mined by swabbing  these ports with a
 white cotton flannel  mitten.
  The occurrence  of flying insects dur-
 ing the previous month was determined
 by hanging sticky fly tape in the vault at
 a location out of the way of fouling. To
 detect the presence of cockroaches, a
 cockroach sticky  trap was placed  in a
 corner of the vault.
  Samples of solids for  arthropod ex-
 traction  were taken  from both  the
 fresher pile in the vault and  from the
 decomposed pile in the removal cham-
 ber if present. Each of these samples
 was a composite of four subsamples
 taken at the edge, center, and intermedi-
 ate levels in  the pile; the total sample
 amounted to approximately 1L.

 Sample Collection  for Basic
 Laboratory and Pathogen
Analyses
  Samples of solids for the various mi-
crobiological, physical, and chemical
analyses were  also taken from  the
vaults with a plastic-bag-lined scoop.
  The areas from which samples were
selected in the solids mass of fresh  ma-
terial, intermediate-aged material,  and
finished  (decomposed) material varied
with the specific analysis needs of the
unit being sampled.
"'Mention of trade names or commercial products
 does not constitute endorsement or recommenda-
 tion for use.
  Leachate accumulation in the vaults
was sampled by suction using a plastic
turkey baster. Samples for microbiolog-
ical tests were submitted in sterile 4-oz
plastic bottles containing sodium thio-
sulfate as a dechlorinating agent. Sam-
ples for physical and chemical analyses
were put into a clean 1/2-gal plastic bot-
tle.

Data and Sample  Collection
from Grey Water Systems
  At sites of grey water systems, inves-
tigators were to examine the immediate
area for signs of leakage and overflow
resulting from  surge loading of the
treatment unit.  The presence  and ab-
sence of odors  and insects, especially
mosquitoes, were noted. Upon opening
the  access port, investigators  were to
observe and report degrees of scum
layer and settled  solids buildup. Dis-
posal  areas  were  not routinely  sub-
jected to observation. Water samples
were removed from the treatment unit
using the same  methods described for
leachates. In the systems where  grey
water was treated, grab samples of both
the influent and the effluent were taken.


Sample Storage and Transport
  All field-collected samples were
shipped to the  DOHS laboratories in
Berkeley in 32- x 20- x 14-in. insulated
boxes. The samples rested on four blue
ice packs held in place with covers of
4-in.-thick flexible  foam  cut to fit the
boxes Most  shipments were made  by
Greyhound Bus within the 30-hr period
specified by  the laboratories  for uni-
form microbiological analyses. Upon
arrival at the Berkeley facility, any sam-
ples to be composited for the basic lab-
oratory and  pathogen analyses were
well mixed under a hood, and  aliquots
were transferred to separate containers
for the bacterial,  viral,  and parasite
screens, as required.  Temperatures  of
the sample were not taken upon arrival
at the  laboratory, but with  few excep-
tions, the blue ice packs were still par-
tially frozen, and the samples were thor-
oughly cooled.
  Specific analytical methods for vector
extraction, identification of arthropods,
coliform  assays, bacteria and parasite
screens,  parasite confirmation and vi-
ability determination, and virus assays
are detailed in the  full report. Physical
and chemical  analyses were performed
according to  U.S.  Environmental Pro-
tection Agency and Standard Methods.
 Risk Assessment Procedure
   Risk assessment was  performed by
 the probability matrix technique (PMT),
 which required two groups of health ex-
 perts. The first group delineated health
 problems that might be associated with
 a given process and estimated the prob-
 ability of their  occurrence. The second
 group judged the severity of the prob-
 lems delineated by the first group.
   Members of  the first group  included
 bacteriologists, virologists, parasitolo-
 gists, entomologists, sanitary  engi-
 neers, and similar professionals. They
 were instructed to make judgments on
 the probability of  problem occurrence
 and to place a  value on the probability
 using a linear  scale  of zero  to one. In
 such a scale, values of less than 0.5 indi-
 cate that  the problem  is  not  likely to
 occur.
  Members  of  the second group were
 all  physicians  who  were directed to
 make judgments concerning  the sever-
 ity of the  problems named by  the first
 group. Relative severity  was ranked
 from 0 to  100, with 100 being the most
 severe and  0 the least.  Relative judg-
 ments about the severity of a problem
 were made in relation to the other prob-
 lems being considered and not to some
 absolute level of severity. The  severity
 judgments were medical  opinions
 based on collective knowledge of  the
 life expectancy, degree of disability, and
 treatment effectiveness associated with
 the public health problems considered.

 Results and Conclusions
  Evidence suggested that performance
 of the biological toilets varied  from
 mere storage of human excrement to
 partially  successful decomposition of
 organics  and/or reduction  of microbio-
 logical hazards.  The physical presence
 of solids at the final chamber of a toilet
 system had  no bearing on whether or
 not treatment had occurred. The rate at
 which excrement moved through a sys-
 tem depended solely on system capac-
 ity and rate of  usage. In  addition,  the
 physical appearance  and odor charac-
 teristics were not reliable indicators of
 the biological degradation process.
  Most of the system users were advo-
 cates of alternative technology,  yet they
 were  generally  unable to make their
 systems  work  satisfactorily.  Few of
these systems displayed any significant
 evidence  of biological composting dur-
 ing 17 months of observation. The sys-
tems  repeatedly showed  evidence of
conditions unfavorable for the occur-

-------
rence of biological composting—for ex-
ample, inadequate use of bulking agent,
too much moisture,  anaerobic condi-
tions, insect vectors, and ambient tem-
peratures. The users were generally not
well  informed about the particular  sen-
sitivities of their systems to improper
operating procedures. Since a majority
of the users were unwilling and/or un-
able  to  perform  recommended opera-
tion  and maintenance procedures, it is
unclear whether any  of  the toilet  sys-
tems studied  were capable of accept-
able  performance.
 Problem Areas Identified
  The following are apparent problem
 areas identified with the proprietary toi-
 let units studied:
  1. Small or awkwardly placed open-
     ings  limited physical access to the
     stored  excrement and either pre-
     vented or hindered the users from
     performing routine maintenance.
  2. Existing internal  structural design
     features or mechanisms intended
     to  mix and/or  aerate solids (e.g.,
     slanted chamber bottom or inter-
     nal rotors) failed  to do so.
  3. Some  of the proprietary devices
     suffered structural failures such as
     topping bar  handle  breakage
     under  normal  use, air  baffle  col-
     lapse under the weight of the ex-
     crement pile, metal fastener corro-
     sion, inefficient  latches, leaking
     holding chamber  design, and
     other construction defects.
  4. Electrical components such as
     heating elements malfunctioned
     and/or did  not  perform as in-
     tended.
  5. Venting systems  used in the stud-
     ied units could not maintain aero-
     bic conditions within the excre-
     ment pile, nor  could they mitigate
     excessive moisture.
  6. Stored excrement attracted  and
     harbored insects even though the
     units were reportedly designed to
     prevent this problem.
  7. The  manufacturer's instructions to
     the user were not always available
     in  English. When instructions were
     available, they uniformly lacked in-
     formation necessary  to under-
     stand the degradation process and
     often  contained unsubstantiated
     and  misleading information about
     the quality and safety  of the  end
      products.
  Problem  areas  identified with
homeowner-built toilet units are as fol-
lows:
  1.  Poor siting allowed the excrement
     chamber  to become inundated
     with surface and/or storm runoff.
     Some subsurface excrement
     chambers were flooded by a rising
     groundwater table during wet
     weather.
  2.  Inadequate or missing seals and/or
     screens over all openings allowed
     insect and rodent vector access to
     the excrement pile.
  3.  Cumbersome access doors hin-
     dered vault owners during opera-
     tion and maintenance, and the lack
     of access to drum  contents pre-
     vented user maintenance activity.
  4.  Uncoated drums frequently cor-
     roded.
  5.  When the recommended  scissor-
     jack arrangement was not used to
     position the drum, full drums were
     difficult to remove for ultimate dis-
     posal.

  Most of the grey water treatment sys-
tems studied also failed to perform their
functions successfully. Analytical  work
performed  during  this  investigation
demonstrated that  individual house-
holds produced highly  variable grey
water of a quality similar to raw domes-
tic sewage.  Merely separating toilet
wastes frorr  the remainder of the
household waste stream does not  in-
sure persona! or public safety.  Both
clothes washing and bathing activities
produced a wide range of indicator or-
ganisms. The major  portion  of coli-
forms  detected  were of fecal origin.
None of the treatment and/or segrega-
tion  schemes resulted  in a reduction of
microbiological hazards or a discernible
wastewater treatment. Only one  treat-
ment scheme (involving a series of set-
tling tanks) resulted in  consistent  re-
moval of particulate matter.
  Nearly all reuse  schemes  involved
seasonal irrigation of landscape and/or
food crops, but most  were  used year-
round  and  had no  provisions  for ulti-
mate disposal of  poor-quality grey
water and surge loads or for storage
when use was contraindicated by wet
weather. Homeowners did not establish
a  routine program  for  operating and
maintaining their systems.  They were
generally aware of them only when mal-
functions or problems  occurred, and
even then they did not place a  high  pri-
ority on resolving the  matter.
Health Risks
  The judgments made by environmen-
tal health experts indicate that the risk
of a public health problem occurring in
a septic tank/soil absorption system
during the lifetime of the system is 1
chance in 500,000. The public health risk
associated with the various combined
black and grey water disposal systems
ranged from 1 chance in 30,000 (for true
composting, mouldering, and buried
drum toilet waste with landscape-
disposed grey water) to 1 in 2,300 (for
drum toilet waste and  grey water dis-
posed on food crops). Systems were as-
signed smaller health risks  when they
did not involve food crops. For example,
the risk associated with true compost-
ing systems in which solids are buried
and  grey water  is used for landscape
irrigation was 1 in 30,000, whereas  the
risk was 1 in 7,000 when grey water was
applied to  food crops  (a fourfold  in-
crease of risk). Numerical values are rel-
ative only, but they are  useful for com-
paring different systems.
  System maintenance potentially in-
creased the health risk to individual
users/but differences in the level of sys-
tem  maintenance would have a limited
effect on risk to the community's health,
depending  on population  and system
density.
  The full report was submitted in  fulfill-
ment of Grant No. R805942 by the Cali-
fornia Department of Health Services
under the  partial sponsorship of  the
U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency.

-------

-------

-------

-------
      K. M. Enferadi, R. C. Cooper, S. C. Goranson, A. W. Olivieri, J. H. Poorbaugh, M.
        Walker, and B. A. Wilson are with State of California, Department of Health
        Services,  Berkeley, CA 94704.
      Steven W.  Hathaway and James F. Kreissl are the EPA Project Officers (see
        below).
      The complete report, entitled "Field Investigation of Biological Toilet Systems and
        Grey Water Treatment,"(OrderNo. PB86-234 648'/AS; Cost: $22.95, subject
        to change) will be available only from:
             National Technical Information Service
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Springfield, VA 22161
              Telephone: 703-487-4650
      The EPA Project Officers can be contacted at:
              Water Engineering Research Laboratory
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
     BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
        EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA/600/S2-86/069

-------