United States
                     Environmental Protection
                     Agency
 Hazardous Waste Engineering
 Research Laboratory
 Cincinnati OH 45268
                     Research and Development
 EPA/600/S2-87/003 Apr. 1987
&EPA          Project  Summary
                     Use  of  Lined  Pits  for  Disposal
                     of  Dilute  Pesticide  Waste

                     George R. Bierman and Narinder P. S. Malik
                      Modern agricultural practices rely
                    heavily on the use of pesticides to sus-
                    tain high productivity. When pesticide
                    containers and application equipment
                    are rinsed after use, the contaminated
                    water requires proper disposal. At Iowa
                    State University in Ames, Iowa,  dilute
                    pesticide rinsates have been placed in a
                    concrete-lined pit for more  than ten
                    years. The pit contains alternating lay-
                    ers of gravel and soil. Water evaporates
                    from the pit surface while  pesticide
                    chemicals are adsorbed on soil  parti-
                    cles, destroyed by microorganisms  or
                    broken down chemically. Monitoring
                    for atmospheric and ground-water con-
                    tamination at the pit site has indicated
                    no  detectable release of pesticides  to
                    the surrounding air or water.  This type
                    of disposal facility may be appropriate
                    for pesticide users generating 10,000
                    gallons or less of dilute pesticide waste
                    annually.

                      This report includes a review of the
                    design criteria for lined pesticide pits
                    and descriptions of pits currently in use
                    around the nation. These facilities are
                    all similar with variations in use of soil
                    and gravel within the pit and the addi-
                    tion of high density polyethylene liners
                    to protect ground water from possible
                    leakage of pit contents. Guidelines for
                    proper siting and operation of the pit
                    are also given.

                      This Project Summary was devel-
                    oped by EPA's Hazardous Waste Engi-
                    neering Research Laboratory, Cincin-
                    nati, OH, to announce key findings  of
                    the research project that is fully  docu-
                    mented in a separate report of the same
                    title (see Project Report ordering infor-
                    mation at back).
 Introduction
  The pesticide disposal facility on
which the full report is based was devel-
oped in the 1960s at the Horticulture De-
partment of Iowa  State University  in
Ames, Iowa. The system, called simply
a "pesticide disposal pit" by its develop-
ers, was created to provide a safe alter-
native to the  practice of disposing  of
waste pesticide solutions by indiscrimi-
nately dumping them on unused fields
or field fringes. The pits were intended
to be particularly useful to farmers who
generate relatively small quantities  of
waste pesticide solutions at any given
time and for those who use a variety  of
pesticides on different crops. A demon-
stration facility was built at Iowa State
University in 1970 and has been in con-
tinuous use since then. No major oper-
ating nor pollution problems have oc-
curred at the demonstration pit.  A
detailed technical report on the Iowa
State Facility entitled  Safe  Disposal
Methods for Agricultural Pesticide
Wastes (No. PB 81-197584) is available
through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service.
  The pesticide disposal pit represented
here is intended for use by individual
farmers  and  others  who  generate
10,000 gallons or less dilute  pesticide
waste annually. Any pit will be subject
to all applicable federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations. If
the user intends to dispose of pesticide
wastes that have been designated as
hazardous  materials  under the Re-
source Conservation and Recovery Act,
a permit to build and operate the pit
may be required. To assist in determin-
ing whether or not  a permit is needed,
the state agencies responsible for haz-

-------
                                                                                                                        I
ardous waste management are listed in
Appendix A in the full report. Corre-
sponding federal organizations in  re-
gional offices are listed in Appendix B.

Pit Design
  In the late 1960s, the Department of
Horticulture at Iowa State University de-
veloped a concept for disposing waste
pesticide solutions. A facility based  on
the concept was built in 1970 at the Uni-
versity's  Horticulture Research  Station
and has  been in continuous use since
that time with satisfactory results. It is
essentially the Iowa State design for the
waste pesticide pit that is  described
here, with some modifications from the
original. In addition, a few variations on
the design that have been developed
and used by others are included.

The Iowa State University
(ISU) Design
  The ISU design is a rectangular, open-
top  tank constructed of concrete and
partially filled with alternating layers of
heavy gravel and soil. See Figure 1. The
pit is about three feet  deep and is set
into the ground so that only about the
upper six inches of the walls rise above
the surface of the ground. In operation,
waste pesticide solutions are loaded
into the pit to a depth of not more than
two inches over the top gravel layer.
The water evaporates and the pesticide
chemicals are  destroyed by  bacteria
and by photolytic action (depending on
exposure of the liquid to sunlight).

Variations On The  ISU Design
  Numerous interested parties have ob-
served the ISU pit and have reviewed
the design. A few have built essentially
identical pits. Others have built similar
pits but have introduced their own de-
sign concepts, some of which can prove
to be practical and useful.
  At the University of Florida's Ft. Laud-
erdale Agricultural Research Station, for
example, variations have been intro-
duced in both construction, fill material,
and loading arrangement. The pit bot-
tom is of concrete, poured with a six-
inch curb. The walls are of concrete
block, built up to a height of 36 inches
above the top of the curb. The concrete
block walls require special attention for
positive sealing against leaks. This is ac-
complished by the application of hy-
draulic sealing materials and by an inte-
rior liner. The liner consists  of two
layers of 8-mil  black polyethylene. The
pit is filled to a  depth of 24 inches with
alternating layers of gravel and soil.
   A pit design variation that is a major
 departure from the ISU concept, but is
 also useful is one in which a layer of soil
 is initially placed in the pit, then waste
 pesticide solutions are fed into the pit
 until a liquid depth of 18-24 inches
 above the top of the soil layer is intro-
 duced. In this concept, characterized by
 pits used at the University of Florida's
 Sanford  Research Station and  at the
 Agway Corporation's Farm Research
 Center at Tully, New York, pesticide
 solids settling out of the solution will be
 anaerobically degraded by microbial ac-
 tivity in the soil layer, while the water
 evaporates. Some photolytic degrada-
 tion will also  take place, depending on
 exposure of the liquid to sunlight. Evap-
. orationj-ates are.likely.to be slowerJihan
 in the ISU concept,  because of the
 greater liquid depth and its resultant
 ability to absorb heat without increas-
 ing the vaporization rate.
   Other design features  of these pits
 would, be similar to those of the  ISU-
 style pits, but a  principal difference is
 found in the  loading arrangements. In
 the Sanford Research Station's pit, the
 waste  pesticide  solutions simply run
 into the pit through a pipe that pro-
 trudes through one end-wall at a height
 just above the highest anticipated liquid
 level. At Agway, a U-shaped, perforated
              Movable Roof
 PVC pipe (with the "U" nearly the length
 and width of the pit) is suspended some
 15-18 inches above the  liquid surface.
 The waste  solutions  are pumped into
 this suspended  pipe and allowed  to
 drain into the pit, with good distribution
 provided by the length and width  of the
 U-shaped pipe run.


 Siting, Operation and
 Maintenance
   The location and maintenance of a
 pesticide pit can affect the facility's effi-
 ciency and  length of useful service. If a
 permit is required for the pit, stringent
 requirements may be included for siting
 and operating the pit. In  the absence of
..permit requirements, .the following fac-
 tors should be considered.

   • Locate  Pit away from Wells
   • Locate  Pit away  from Residences
     and Property Lines
   • Locate Pit away from Surface Water
     Bodies
   • Expose Pit to Sunlight
   • Unrestricted  Air Flow
   • Control Pit Liquid Level
   • Equipment Wash Racks - Control
     Wash water Quantities
   • Record Pit Loadings
   • Monitor for Leaks

                                                 Sump •
                     Samp/ing Riser •
                        Longitudinal Cross Section

         Sampling Riser •	-^   /- Sump
                                                Roof Rails
*i
f.e
r>
^y
• T
^T^
i '
i
i


a
'"'•
V"
B ~H6
V J2'-0" 1
~"

£fc^—
igr- • s»&
6'-0"

:— Con
I
r
k
-r-
12
:re

(W
VI
?•>
r
te 1
&m
6'-0"
/-
°ier J
1
:.b-
h
m\
2'-0
1
r
                               Transverse Cross Section

 Figure 1.    The Iowa State University pesticide waste disposal pit.

-------

-------
     George R. Bierman andNarinder P. S. Malik are with Engineering and Economics
       Research. Inc.. Vienna. VA 22180.
     Brian A.  Westfall is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
     The complete report, entitled "Use of Lined Pits for Disposal of Dilute Pesticide
       Waste," (Order No. PB 87-145 926/AS; Cost: $11.95.  subject to change)
       will be available only from:
             National Technical Information Service
             5285 Port Royal Road
             Springfield, VA 22161
             Telephone: 703-487-4650
     The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
             Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory
             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
             Cincinnati,  OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
     BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
        EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA/600/S2-87/003


-------