United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Laboratory
Ada, OK 74820
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S2-91/033  Aug. 1991
&EPA       Project Summary
                    The Swelling  Properties of Soil
                    Organic Matter  and Their
                    Relation to  Sorption of Non-Ionic
                    Organic Compounds
                    William G. Lyon and David E. Rhodes
                      A method has been developed to
                    measure the swelling properties of con-
                    centrated natural organic materials In
                    various organic liquids, and has been
                    applied to various peat, pollen, chttln
                    and cellulose samples. The swelling of
                    these macromolecular materials Is the
                    volumetric manifestation of bulk sorp-
                    tlon, I.e., sorptlon by dissolution (or
                    partitioning) of the sorbsd liquids Into
                    the macromolecular  solid phase.  Di-
                    rect evidence for the existence of this
                    category of sorbed materials has been
                    obtained for soil organic materials by
                    the present research; swelling In liq-
                    uids has long been known In coals and
                    polymers.
                      Bulk sorbed molecules are  thought
                    to be Inaccessible to direct biological
                    attack, and may represent a continuing
                    source of low-level, "rebound" contami-
                    nation of groundwater at a polluted site
                    following attempted pump-and-treat
                    remediation.  Equilibration  of bulk
                    sorbed molecules with  liquid  phases
                    surrounding the particles Is klnetically
                    slow (diffusion limited) relative  to sorp-
                    tlon and fluid movement, and this slug-
                    gishness Is probably responsible for
                    some nonequlllbrlum sorptlon phenom-
                    ena seen In soil column flow experi-
                    ments.
                      Molecules with molar volumes greater
                    than about 93 cm* mor1 appear to be
                    strongly excluded from sorptlon inside
                    the soil organic  materials studied In
                    this work.  In contrast, cellulose ex-
                    cluded molecules with molar volumes
                    greater than 88 cm1 mor1.
  Besides the size exclusion factor, the
degree of swelling of soil organic ma-
terials In different liquids Is controlled
mainly by site-specific, generalized
acid-base  Interactions  between the
sorbed molecules and the various
acidic sites within soil organic materi-
als. The swelling spectra observed for
soil materials are complex, and  com-
pletely unlike the  simple Gaussian
swelling spectra obssrved for polymers
like rubber (cross-linked  polylsoprene)
and for some coals.  In these  latter
materials the Intermolecular forces are
dominated by non-specific dispersion
forces (van der Waals Interactions), and
can be adequately  treated by simple
equations  (Flory-Hugglns-Rehner
theory) Involving  the solubility param-
eters of the liquid  and the swelling sub-
strate.
  Swelling In morphollne appears to
be a characteristic of soil organic ma-
terials containing free cellulose.  Un-
fortunately, the cellulose  within natural
llgno-celluloslc plant debris apparently
behaves differently from free cellulose,
so that swelling  alone does not pro-
vide a simple measurs of humlflcatlon
in  soils or peats. We speculate that
the Intimate association  of llgnln with
the cellulose at  the molecular  level
blocks access to the specific sites (al-
cohollc-OH groups) on  the cellulose
with which morphollne Interacts most
strongly.  Free cellulose does,  how-
ever, appear to be present In pollen
Intlne membranes.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Robert 5. Kerr Environmental
                                                                   Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
 Research Laboratory, Ada,  OK, to an-
 nounce key findings of the research
 project that Is fully  documented In a
 separate report of the same title (see
 Project Report ordering Information at
 back).

 Introduction

 The Swelling Phenomenon
   Macromolecular substances swell when
 placed  in contact with  various fluids1; the
 amount of swelling  depends both on the
 nature  of the fluid,  and of the macromo-
 lecular  material. Strongly cross-linked ma-
 terials  swell less  than  weakly cross-
 linked materials. Such swelling is a prop-
 erty of  the insoluble macromolecular net-
 work itself,  and it occurs even when all
 associated  soluble  materials  have  been
 removed by exhaustive solvent extraction.
   Swelling is the dissolution of small mol-
 ecules  of  more mobile  substances  into
 the solid.  The  macromolecules act  as a
 solvent for these smaller molecules, and
 the swollen phase represents an unusual
 kind  of  solution.   An  alternate  point of
 view  is  that swelling represents the solva-
 tion of internal macromolecular "surfaces"
 by the smaller fluid molecules.

 The Connection Between
 Sorption and Swelling
   Swelling represents a volumetric mani-
 festation of  certain  kinds  of  sorption
 involving bulk sorption  (partitioning)  into
 soil organic matter.   The various catego-
 ries of sorption  in soil organic matter are
 detailed in the diagram below.

 Bulk Sportion and Swelling
   Swelling   experiments  measure  the
 maximum capacity for bulk sorption of
 certain  solvents that solid organic materi-
 als can  hold while in contact with the pure
 solvent.   This  limiting  capacity  can be
 expressed if a  variety  of units, such  as
 cm3  sorbed  solvent per  cm3  sorbent.
 Sorbed  material  in this form represents a
 potential source of residual contamination
that is  difficult to remove completely  by
 any known process  (e.g., solvent extrac-
tion,  vacuum extraction, biodegradation,
etc.)  This residual contamination  is  con-
sidered  to be of greatest importance for
the smaller,  more polar solvent molecules
such  as methanol.  Some solid  macro-
molecuialr soil organic materials (e.g., cel-
lulose and chitin) can themselves  be bio-
 Sorption Categoric In Natural Soil Organic Matter
1 Here we restrict the discussion to fluids with a single
 molecular constituent. When two constituents are
 present, a richer, more complex set of phenomena
 can occur, such as gel-collapse, phase transitions,
 where a swollen gel can suddenly decrease in volume
 when exposed to a fluid of different composition.
                   Swelling &
                   Bulk Sorption
                   (partitioning)
 Organic Matter
                  Surface Sorption
                    (adsorption
                                               Insoluble Solid Phases *
                                               (Humin, Cellulose, Chitin)
                                               Extractable Phases"
                                               (Waxes, Resins, LJpids, etc)
                                               Polar ° & Hydrogen Bonding
   Cation Exchange"
                                               Non-Polar (hydrophobic)
                  Capillary Condensation1
                  (micro pores)
  Dissolution in these materials is accompanied by size exclusion. Also, within the solid macromolecular structures,
  different types of organic molecules will preferentially solvate various sites: polar, non-polar, hydrogen bonding,
  cation exchange, etc.
  Dissolution of various sorbed molecules occurs without significant size exclusion. Naturally, too many "sorbed*
  molecules in the form of excess solvent will extract and mobilize these materials. Here we emphasize the role of
  native waxes, resins, etc., rather than that of anthropogenic residual separate-phase liquid contaminants which
  can act similarly.
  Polar is used here only to denote a dass of molecules. Various authors (for example, Fowkes, 1960) have shown
  that dipole-dipole interaction between polar molecules in a liquid (in contrast to the vapor phase) represent only a
  very tiny portion of the intermolecular interactions compared to donor-acceptor interactions.
  Cation exchange sorption phenomena would include replacement of ionizable, acidic hydrogens by cationic organic
  species, but also polarization of some ligands by multi-charged, exchanged cations.
  Some size exclusion effects probably operate here also.
degraded, and would presumably release
materials sorbed in bulk as the macromo-
lecular matrix is destroyed.
  The extractable organic soil phases are
also capable of bulk sorption (dissolution)
of various hydrophobic chemicals. Unlike
the insoluble solid phases, however, these
materials are potentially capable of mobili-
zation by the right mixtures of nonaqueous
solvents.  The sorbed species are prob-
ably also somewhat more accessible to
reoediation measures,  especially  if they
are sorbed into biodegradable lipid or wax
fractions.

Surface Sorption
  True  surface sorption  can  be  defined
meaningfully for insoluble soil organic mat-
ter  for sufficiently large  organic mol-
ecules that  are effectively excluded
from the macromolecular framework of
humin  and other macromolecules.  This
restriction  to surface  interaction  is prob-
ably very important for many agrochemi-
cals such  as insecticides, fungicides  and
herbicides, which tend to be rather large
molecules2.  Note, however, that the lower
molecular weight, microbial metabolites of
these chemicals may distribute themselves
over the available sorption categories  in a
completely different way than the parent
chemical.

Sorption  in Micropores
  The final category of sorbed material is
that which resides  in the  micropores of
the various solid organic materials without
causing any  volumetric  increase.   No
doubt, some size exclusion effects oper-
  Large in this context means somewhat larger than the
  aromatic ring of benzene.

-------
ate in this situation as well, but probably
not as stringently as in the bulk sorption
into macromolecular organic matter. The
difference between certain gravimetric de-
terminations of sorption  and  volumetric
determinations of  sorption  (via swelling,
see below) can indicate the magnitude of
the sorption capacity in this form.  In many
ways, this is the least understood of the
categories  in the diagram.  Diffusion in
and out of micropores also could produce
some of the non-equilibrium effects  seen
in column studies.

Operational Definition of
Volumetric Swelling
  The volumetric swelling3, Q , is defined
as the ratio of the swollen volume to the
unswpllen volume of the sprbent; a value
of unity4 indicates no swelling.  The recip-
rocal of the volumgtric swelling is equal to
the volume fraction of macromolecular
material in the swollen,  solution phase.
Thus, the volumetric  swelling  at equilib-
rium is  related to the  saturated solubility
of the sorbed fluid in  the swollen phase.
Knowledge of appropriate  densities, al-
lows this volume-fraction solubility to be
converted to the  more usual gravimetric
concentration units.
  The volumetric swelling5 is the quantity
determined experimentally in the present
work.  A  swelling spectrum  is obtained
when the volumetric swelling for various
solvents is plotted versus some pertinent
solvent  property, such as the convention-
ally chosen solubility parameter.

Experimental Procedures

Samples Studied

Michigan Peat
  The sample of Michigan peat was com-
mercial  horticultural peat from the 'Alpar
' The volumetric swelling, O, should not be confuted
  with the volume change, AV^14. aModated with the

  solvent + solid sorbent -»  swollen sorbent
  The values for CL are positive values 21.0 except in
  the extremely unlikely situation where the AV u^ll  is
  negative and exceeds the imbibed volume of solvent.
  Many values of A V,_,_ are potentially Qtflatbft, and
  they are usually noTknow because of the difficulty of
  determination. Usually AV, _  values are some
  small percentage of the volume of imbibed liquid.
4 Apparent swelling values less than unity could occur
  if some material is extracted into solution by the
  applied solvent
• We note that selling can also be determined gutf-
  mairieaUy in these cases, the amount of sorbed
  material is determined gravimetricaNy, and converted
  to a volume basis using densities. Usually the gravi
  metrically determined swelling is larger than the volu-
  metric quantity because it includes the filling of
  micropores without any associated swelling.
Peat Company of Ovid, Michigan (Clinto-
County).  The dark, muck peat is a pre-
dominately reed-sedge  peat with  some
contributions  from tamarack trees.  The
mined deposit is a layer approximately 8
to 10 feet in thickness in a region once
used for farming.

Canadian Peat
  The Canadian peat was a commercial
horticultural peat with  a light brown color
and a distinctly fibric texture.  Information
on the origin of this material was unavail-
able.  Both acid-washed and calcium-ex-
changed versions of this peat were stud-
ied.

Atoka Pine Duff
  The  Atoka material  consisted  of
cmposted pine needles (Pinus  echinata)
that had collected in small pockets on a
rocky slope located in Atoka County, Okla-
homa (S20, T1S, R13E).   The mineral
constituents were in the form of fine, wind-
blown, clay-sized  dust.

Pine Pollen  (Pinus echinata) &
Oak Pollen (Quercus stellata)
  The  samples of  pine pollen  and oak
pollen were btained from a commercial
laboratory that supplies various species of
pollen and mold spores to allergists.

Cellulose
  The sample of cellulose was obtained
from Aid rich Chemical Company, Inc. and
was a powder of nominally 20u,m average
particle  diameter.  Data from the supplier
showed an average assay of about 90%
a-cellulose based on acid hydrolysis and
an average residue on ignition  ("ash") of
about 0.05%.

Chitin (Crab Shell Chitin)
  The sample of  purified crab shell chitin
was obtained from Sigma Chemical Com-
pany.

Solvents Used
  The  solvents  used for swelling mea-
surements are listed in Table I along with
values for their  solvent parameter and
molar zolume. All solvents were the best
available  commercial  grades, and were
used without further purification.

Summary of Swelling
Measurement Method
  The basic method has been described
by Green et a/.,  1984 for coal  samples.
* Mention of trademarks or commercial products does
 not constitute endorsement or recommendation for
 use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The adaption of this method to the present
kind  of  sample is detailed in the full re-
port.  Spectra  were taken  in pairs and
averaged to obtain the final spectra repro-
duced in this project summary.
  Powdered organic matter was placed in
small glass tubes and exposed to various
liquid organic solvents.  Centrifuging at a
constant speed for a  fixed time  period
was  used to obtain reproducible compac-
tion  of  the  powders.   Length measure-
ments were made on the powder columns
before  and  after wetting  with each sol-
vent, and the final swelling was computed
as a ratio of lengths once equilibrium had
been achieved.  Samples were equilibrated
at 30°C in a waterbath prior to swelling
length measurements to avoid known ki-
netic difficulties near  room temperature,
especially in the swelling of cellulose.

Preparation and Processing of
Samples

Air-Drying, Diminution of Particles
and Sieving
  The  swelling experiment  requires
samples of finely powdered organic mate-
rials, relatively concentrated in their swell-
ing components.  Fibrous materials such
as the Canadian peat cannot be readily
"ground" to a  fine powder, but can be
chopped to a  sufficiently small size with
the blades  in a blender so that a reason-
able  harvest of -100 mesh (i.e. less than
100  mesh) material can be obtained by
sieving.

Soxhlet Extractions
  Soxhlet extractions were conducted us-
ing a three-stage sequence of  solvents
consisting of 1-propanol, 1-propanol-tolu-
ene (28% propanol) mixture, and toluene.
The  purpose of this pre-swelling extrac-
tion procedure was two-fold:

   1. to remove as much of the extract-
     able fraction as possible so that the
     various swelling solvents applied to
     these  organic materials  would  not
     dissolve any further materials frol the
     samples, and
   2. to  remove hydrophobia, low-melting
     waxes from the particle surfaces so
     that the samples could be dried at
     105°C without blocking access to the
     particle interiors for some of the more
     hydrophilic swelling solvents.

  Unfortunately, some  highly swelling sol-
vents such as  DMSO and the various
amides  dissolved considerable  amounts
of humic  materials from  some  samples
during the swelling determinations. In sev-

-------
Table I.  Solvents for Obtaining Swelling Spectra

Solvent                  6
                                               Molar Volume (cm'/mol)*
n-Pentane
n- Heptane
Methylcyclohexane
Cydohexane
p-Xytene
Toluene
Ethyl Acetate
Benzene
Tetralin
Acetylacetone6
Chlorobenzene
Dichloromethane
Acetone
Carbon DisulfkJe
1 ,4-Dioxane
Nitrobenzene
3- Methyl- 1-butanol
1-Octanol
Pyridine
Morpholine
N , N- Oimethy lacetamicte
1 -Pentanol
Nitroe thane
1-Butand
2-Propanol
Acetonitrile
1-Propanol
Dimethyl sulfoxide
N,N-Dimethylformamkte
Nitromethane
Ethanol (99.9%)
Propytene Carbonate"
Methanol
1 ,2-Ethanediol
1 ,2-Propanediol
N-Methylformamide
Form amide
Water
14.3
15.1
16.0
16.8
18.0
18.2
18.6
18.8
19.4
19.5
19.6
19.8
20.2
20.4
20.5
20.5
20.5
21.1
21.9
22.1
22.1
22.3
22.7
23.3
23.5
24.1
24.3
24.5
24.8
26.0
26.0
27.2
29.6
29.9
30.7
32.9
39.3
47.9
116.3
147.6
127.6
108.1
123.3
106.8
98.5
89.4
137.1
103.4
102.6
64.5
74.0
60.6
85.7
103.4
108.9
156.4
80.9
87.5
93.0
108.8
71.9
91.9
77.0
53.0
75.2
70.9
77.0
53.7
58.7
85.9
40.7
55.9
73.7
58.4
39.7
18.1
• The delta values tabulated here are mostly the simple solubility parameters of the liquids at 25°C tabulated by Barton, 1983; in a few instances where these were missing, the
  total solubility parameter,  8 ,, from the same reference was used instead.
" The values for the molar volume (cm'/mol) were in most cases computed from molecular weights (g/mol) and density (g/cm*) values for the liquids at 25°C tabulated by Barton,
 1983. A few missing values were computed from similar data tabulated in standard handbooks elsewhere (e.g., Weast, 1984)
c 2,4-Pentanedione
 "1,2-Propanediol cyclic carbonate
eral instances these solvents gave super-
natant solutions over the  swollen solid
material that were ais dark as coffee.

Acid Washing and Cation
Exchange
      Acid  washing with 0.1 M HCI solu-
tions  was performed when i was desired
to have the acid torn of the organic mate-
rials for study.  Washing with 0.5 M CaCI2
solution was performed when the calcium-
exchanged  version of the organic materi-
als was needed; this was foil wed by water
                                            washing to a  chloride-free  condition  as
                                            determined by  tests with aqueous AgNO3
                                            solution.

                                            Vacuum  Oven Drying
                                              The drying treatment for all organic ma-
                                            terials consisted of vacuum oven drying at
                                            105°C for  24 hours at a  few  Torr pres-
                                            sure: once just before loading the pow-
                                            ders in the swelling tubes, and a second
                                            time after  loading in the tubes.  After the
                                            second  drying,  the filjed tubes ere quickly
                                            capped  with teflon caps to prevent uptake
                                            of moisture from the air.
Results

Swelling Spectra
  The choice of solvent solubility param-
eter as the abscissa is traditional in plots
of swelling,  but solubility parameter,  by
itself, has no special predictive power for
the swelling in these materials.  What is
seen instead, are spectra with large jumps
in swelling for very small changes in sol-
vent solubility parameter. These jumps in
swelling are largely attributable  to  site-
specific chemical interactions of  the do-
nor-acceptor type that  lower the net free

-------
               2.7
        (D
        I
        H
        J

        III
        z
        (0

        o
        H
        n
        h
        UJ
        E
        D
        J
        0
        fl
        UJ

        0
        UJ
        o:
        n
        o
        o
         i
        i
        0)
        
-------
         (D
         I
         H
         J
         J
         UJ
         Z
         0)

         o
         M
         cc
         h
         UJ
         E
         D
         J
         0
                     14
24
34
44
                                                                                                 54
                                  DELTA,  SOLVENT  SOLUBILITY  PARAMETER
Figure 2. Swelling vs. 8o, pine and oak pollen. The swelling spectra of pine pollen and oak pollen are compared in this plot. No ash corrections were applied
        to these data.

-------
          0
          z
          H
          J
          J
          UJ

          (0

          0
          M
          o:
          h
          UJ
          E
          D

          O
                2.5 -
1.3  -
                  1  ~
                 0.7  -
                       14
                          24
34
                                                                                   44
                                                                                       54
                                     DELTA,  SOLVENT  SOLUBILITY PARAMETER
Rgure 3. Swelling vs. 6C, oeNulose and chitin. This figure compares the swelling spectra for cellulose and chitin. The raw spectrum for cellulose was
        scaled by a constant factor so that the average background value of the swelling was shifted upwards to 1.0.  No corrections for ash were
        applied to either spectrum.

-------
energy of the swollen state for some swell-
ing agents.
   Representative swelling spectra for the
major classes of  materials studied in the
present work (peat-like materials, pollens,
and polysaccharides) are given in Figures
1, 2, and 3.  Ash  corrections for the peat-
like materials  were made under the as-
sumption that the mineral matter was en-
tirely an inert, non-swelling diluent.  The
spectrum for cellulose was  scaled by a
constant factor so that the average back-
ground  value of  the swelling was shifted
upwards to 1.0.

Molecular Size-Exclusion
Effects
   The evidence for molecular size-exclu-
sion is  simple and direct.  Figure  4 dis-
plays a graph of swelling values  plotted
against  solvent molar volume for all mate-
rials except cellulose.  The largest solvent
still capable  of significantly swelling these
materials is N,N-dimethylacetamide with a
molar volume of  ca. 93 cm3  mor1.  Many
solvents with molar volumes less than this
can swell these materials. For cellulose,
the  pattern  is  similar except  that
morpholine with a molar volume of ca.  87
cm3 mor' represents the largest swelling
solvent observed.

Consequences for
Environmental Studies
   It would be  desirable in environmental
studies  of the fate and  transport  of or-
ganic contaminants in the subsurface to
delineate all possible  categories of sorp-
tion onto soil and  aquifer materials in terms
of capacity,  equilibrium,  energetics and
kinetics.  This is far from being accom-
plished  even for  the  simplest of  typical
real systems.
  The  major application of  the  present
work to  real environmental questions cen-
ters  on  the  direct demonstration  of  an
additional category of  sorbed substances
that can occur in soil and aquifer systems.
Some nonequilibrium  partitioning  effects
seen in  soil column experiments may well
involve  a diffusion-limited step  between
swollen  organic particles and the external
fluid phase. We wonder, also about labo-
ratory bio-degradation studies using small
molecules such as methanol as a carbon
source.  Here we would expect methanol
to swell any soil organic matter that was
present,  and thus,  add a slow diffusion
step to the overall kinetics of the degrada-
tion  process for methanol.  In dilute sys-
tems, this would be complicated by com-
petitive sorption phenomena involving wa-
ter a|so.
   The bulk-sorbed fraction inside  macro-
rnolecular organic materials probably can
serve as a source of hard-to-remove  re-
sidual contamination in a pump and treat
remediation; however, not all organic mol-
ecules can participate in bulk sorption into
the solid organic matter. Size exclusion
seems to limit the category to fairly small,
polar molecules such as some alcohols
and amides. If these species were present
in a contaminating mixture, they also might
serve as co-sorbents for other small mol-
ecules with less polar character, such as
the smaller chlorinated hydrocarbons. We
do not expect most of the alkanes and
aromatic species  present  in fuels to
undergo  significant bulksorption Into
rnacromolecular organic  materials in
soils and aquifers.
   The present work with  its emphasis on
rnacromolecular materials does not, how-
ever, rule out the possible bulk sorption of
hydrophobia organic molecules into the
wax-resin-lipid fraction of soils, nor does it
rule out significant sorption into micropores
(i.e., capiilary condensation).  These sorp-
tion categories, extractable  materials (bi-
tumens) and microporosity, represent po-
tentially important separate areas  for fur-
ther  study, and  may be responsible  for
much supposed "partitioning" of non-ionic
organic contaminants.

Suggestion for Future Work
   Since volume is only a partial constraint
on molecular shape, it is to be expected
that the volume boundary for swelling is a
somewhat blurry barrier;  some long rod-
like molecules might retain some swelling
ability though more globular molecules with
similar donor-acceptor capabilities might
not.   The magnitude of molecular exclu-
sion has been partially delimited by the
present work, but these limits really need
to be challenged with further swelling stud-
ies using carefully chosen homologous
series of compounds (e.g., substituted pyri-
dines or surfoxide) with similar  donor-ac-
ceptor properties.
   The present method of obtaining swell-
ing measurements is fairly labor intensive,
and, unfortunately,  rather imprecise. Re-
cently, various instrumental  methods have
become available for  studying the par-
ticle-size distributions of powdered materi-
als dispersed in liquids. It  would be very
worthwhile  to explore  the  use of these
instruments for obtaining swelling data on
a  given material from particle size distri-
butions taken in different solvents.  This
should be relatively simple  to do for pow-
ders consisting of a single  substance like
cellulose or chrtin. The swelling of a het-
erogeneous  mixture of insoluble organic
materials might still be successfully ana-
lyzed by such methods, provided:

   1. a  series of solvents were  used that
     affected the components differently,
     and
   2. the size distribution functions for the
     different components  were of rela-
     tively  simple analytical types,  such
     as tognormal or Gaussian.

References
Barton,  A.F.M., 1983, CRC Handbook of
   Solubility Parameters and Other Cohe-
   sion Parameters, CRC Press, Inc., Boca
   Raton, FL.

Fowkes, F.M., 1980, "Donor-Acceptor  In-
  teractions  at Interfaces",  Polymer Sci-
   ence  and Technology, v.  12A, p. 43-52,
   Plenum Press, NY.

Green, T.K., Kovac, J., and Larsen, J.W.,
   1984, A Rapid and Convenient Method
  for Measuring the Swelling of Coals by
  Solvents, Fuel v. 63, p. 935-938.

Weast,  R.C.,  1984, CRC  Handbook of
   Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, Inc.,
  Boca Raton, FL, p. F8.

-------
                 2.9
         (D

         H
         J
         J
         llJ
         3
         CO

         0
         H
         o:
          E

          J
          O
                 2.5
2.1
                 1.7
                 1.3
                 8.9

-

•

•
-
-

• 1 1

1
<

>
a
r
H
X
	 x. 	
i
. i i i
•

0
•
	 o.o. 	
D
1 * «ft
I
\ + T
o *x Y+
Ax
\ J \
* i i;
	 f] 	 JN-m-
A 1C
* !? xf
D % 9
D 0 0
Q
i
1 1 1



X
I g
a
• T
•f
D °
X
X
D,wV I I
Tm • ^J"
6$ %fi x
....0. 	
I
• • •






X TV
x . x x x
y j. ^
i« * » '
•
i

•

-

-
-
-
I
                                                                                         128
                                                                                              168
                                              VBAR,  SOLVENT  MOLAR  VOLUME
Flgun 4. Swelling vs. solvent molar volume. S»'elling for Michigan and Canadian peats, Ca-exchanged Canadian Peat, Atoka oak pollen and chitin are
         plotted versus solvent molar volume. The data exhibit an abrupt drop-off for solvents with volumes larger than N,N-dimethylacetamide (ca. 93
         cm* mot1). Above tins rather fuzzy boundary, swellings tend to be near 1.0 plus some background imprecision.
                                                                            •tnj.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 - 648-080/40221

-------

-------

-------
   William G. Lyon and David E. Rhodes are with ManTech Environmental Technology,
     Inc., Ada. OK 74820.
   Roger Crosby is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report, entitled "The Swelling Properties of Soil Organic Matter and thier
     Relation to Sorptton of Non-tonic Organic Compounds," (Order No. PB91-217406/
     AS; Cost: $23.00; subject to change) will be available only from:
           National Technical Information Service
           5285 Port Royal Road
           Springfield, VA 22161
           Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
           Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
           U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Ada, OK 74820
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
EPA PERMIT NO. G-35
  Official Business
  Penalty for Private Use $300
  EPA/600/S2-91/033

-------