United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Atmospheric Research and
Exposure Assessment Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC  27711
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S3-90/039 July 1990
&EPA          Project  Summary

                     Galvanized  Steel -  National
                     Distribution  Study
                     J. Crouch and J. Catalano
                       The full report  describes a field
                    survey done to observe the extent
                    and application of  barge galvanized
                    steel  in the  United  States.   For
                    purposes, of  the analysis,  the
                    conterminous 48 states were grouped
                    into four regions. Industrial and rural
                    areas  were considered in  the study
                    which examined galvanized steel ap-
                    plications  of roofing, siding, gutters
                    and  flashing, transmission  line
                    towers,  fencing, pole line  hardware,
                    guardrails, and storage  facilities.  A
                    field  survey  was conducted  in four
                    cities  thought to be representative of
                    each  region  for visual inventory.  In-
                    house surveying was then performed
                    using aerial   photography  cor-
                    responding to  the areas visited  and
                    relevant land use data to  calculate
                    surface area of  the observed
                    galvanized  steel.   Extrapolation to
                    entire metropolitan areas was done
                    through the land  use  statisticcs.
                    Estimates of galvanized steel surface
                    in  non-residential  urban areas  from
                    l:he survey observations  are 9.2 xio4
                    m2 for Cleveland, 53.8 xio4  m2 for
                    Atlanta,  38.6xio4 m2 for Dallas,  and
                    256.8xio4 m2 for Sacramento.
                       This Project  Summary  was
                    developed  by  EPA's  Atmospheric
                    Research and  Exposure  Assessment
                    Laboratory, Research Triangle Park,
                    NC, to announce key findings of the
                    research  project that  is fully
                    documented  in  a separate report of
                    the same  title  (see Project Report
                    ordering information at back).
                       A field survey was done to determine
                    Ihe extent that bare galvanized steel  is
                    used  in the  United States.  Galvanized
                    steel is widely used  for  roofing, siding,
                    gutters,  flashings,  tramsmission  line
towers, fencing, telephone pole hardware,
guardrails and storage facilities such as
sheds and warehouses. The survey  was
done in four  cities  which were selected
as representative  of the  four  major
geographic regions  of the United States.
The  four  cities and  the regions they
represented are:  Cleveland,  OH
(Northeast),  Atlanta,  GA (Southeast),
Dallas, TX (Central) and Sacramento, CA
(West). In the survey, the surface area of
the galvanized steel  used in  buildings,
towers, poles, fences and guardrails  was
determined.
   An initial selection of  ground survey
areas was made  from  groupings of
industrial  land use  near  the downtown
area and  groupings  of mixed
industrial/commercial or commercial land
use in the suburbs.  In Atlanta, where no
large  industrial concentration existed,
only mixed industrial/commercial sections
were visited.
   Sections of  2  or 3  blocks to be
canvassed were selected upon arrival
within the  survey  area.   Any structure
sighted with  a galvanized coating was
sketched.  Galvanizing  was  identified
from  the material's characteristic coloring
and granular  appearance  of the surface
zinc  crystals.  The structure's position
was  noted  in relation to  adjacent
landmarks and, if access was possible, a
photograph was taken  along with a meter
rod for scaling.  If not accessible,  the
structure height was estimated  and noted
on the sketch.
   The emphasis was to cover as many
blocks as  possible at the  expense of
missing  small amounts.    USGS
topographical maps  were  obtained in
each city  to  confirm exact building
location.   The sketch and  photo were
used to  show  which  surfaces  of  the

-------
building  were  galvanized  as  well  as
building dimensions.   All blocks visited
were counted as  part of  the  area
surveyed,  regardless of whether or not
galvanized steel was found.
   Surface areas of galvanized steel were
calculated  using  the field  notes and
photographs.   Aerial photographs  were
viewed under magnification to locate the
structure within the survey  area and
obtain roof dimensions.   These amounts,
by  application,  were  multiplied  by land
use area within the metropolis to obtain a
total for each land  use category.
   Galvanized steel usage on farms was
recorded  by number of farms instead of
land use since a count of the number of
farms for  1985 was  available.   In this
survey, farm fencing was not considered;
the fence  category  for  farms  refers  to
formed sheet- metal gates.
   Extrapolation to  entire metropolitan
areas  was  done through  land  use
statistics.  Estimates of galvanized  steel
surface in non- residential urban areas
from the survey observations are 9.2x104
m2 for  Cleveland,  53.8x104  m2 for
Atlanta,  38.6x104 m2 for Dallas,  and
256.8x104 m2 for Sacramento.
   A comparison was made between the
results  of this  survey and those of two
other surveys of the material.   One was
performed  by  TRC  Environmental
Consultants and the  other by  the  U.S.
Army Corps of  Engineers, Cold  Regions
Research  Environmental  Laboratory
(CRREL).   The results  of the  CRREL
survey were summarized  by  Haynie
(Personal  Communication,  1988)  and
were used in the report.
   A t-test  procedure  was  used  to
evaluate difference of  means  between
surface areas  surveyed for  roofing,
siding,  fencing  and  "other" applications
and  two other  earlier surveys  (CRREL
and  TRC) covering  rural and  industrial
areas.   With  the exception  of  farm
fencing, no  significant  difference  was
found  at  the  90%  confidence  level
between sample means.  However, the
Aerocomp values  tended to  be lower;
partly due to the  survey method, which
sometimes  overlooked  small surfaces.
On fencing, the CRREL survey recorded
plane  surfaces,  whereas  Aerocomp
calculated  the  actual  wire  surface  of
fencing.   As  noted  earlier,  perimeter
fencing on farms was not included in the
Aerocomp survey, so  that a  significant
difference exists for this application.
   A survey  was made  of  highway
departments of the  48  states to obtain
guardrail   and  fencing  mileage.
Responses varied  markedly. Some states
had the figures  readily available  whereas
others had never made a survey.  Totals
for highway guardrail were received from
27 states, having a mean of 2694.5 km of
guardrail with a standard  deviation  of
2312.4 km. Predictor variables tested for
each  region  were  population,  highway
length,  state  area,  land  profile,  and
average  elevation of the state's highest
and  lowest points.  Only  the  Northeast
region showed  some correlation with
population.   For  other  regions,  no
predictor proved significantly better than
a linear average.
   The figures for fencing were even less
extensive  than  those  for  guardrails.
Highway  fencing lengths were  received
from 17 states with a mean of 3275.3  km
and a standard deviation of 3594.4 km.
The same predictor variables used for  the
guardrail estimate  were  attempted.
However, only state area was significant,
at the 50% significance  level.   So,  an
average of the fence values was used for
the estimate.
   A small number of street fixtures  in
Cleveland were galvanized poles; wooden
or painted  poles predominated.  Allpole
fixtures  in  Dallas and Atlanta were
painted  or wooden.   In  downtown
Sacramento it  was  observed that a large
number  of   street  fixtures  were
galvanized.
   Literature  searches  were  made  to
estimate  transmission tower galvanized
steel surface.  The Directory of Electric
Utilities  supplied a  sum  of  line length
nationally. Torpey and Lipfert in Methods
for Estimating Materials in  Infrastructure
sampled  typical transmission lines, giving
an estimate of the mean circuits per line
and  percentage  of  steel towers.   This
report gave a  mean of the  surface area
per tower resulting in  regional  estimates
of galvanized steel surface area in m3  on
transmission towers as follows  Northeast
Region, 66.5x106,  Southeast 62.2x106,
Central 25.2x106, West 44.0x106.
   Comparison  was  made  with
transmission line length in New York from
Torpey's work.  The estimated  length of
transmission lines for  all utilities in New
York  from the  Directory of  Electric
Utilities  is 15,245  miles and a  total
number of transmission towers in New
York was 57,925.   This compares with
54,000 structures for  New  York in the
Torpey report.
   An additional dataset was   obtained
from  Haynie  on residential  housing.
Galvanized steel amounts for both multi-
family  and single  family  homes  were
extracted  from this  dataset. These
studies sought to estimate the distribution
of exterior building materials in residential
areas by  sampling  in  these cities and
comparing between the cities for usage
trends.  The samples  were taken from
single and multi-family housing units, and
the materials surveyed included paint,
masonry,  stone,  galvanized surfaces,
galvanized fencing,  and  a  few other
miscellaneous  materials.   The  average
amount of external galvanizing found per
building was  0.90 m2  for single family
dwellings and  0.07 m2 for  multi-family
dwellings.

-------

-------
  J. Crouch and J. Catalano are with Aerocomp, Inc., Costa Mesa, CA  92626
  Fred H. Haynie is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
  The complete report,  entitled "Galvanized  Steel - National Distribution  Study,"
        (Order No. PB 90-215 799/AS;  Cost: $17.00,  subject to change) will be
        available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States                   Center for Environmental Research
Environmental Protection         Information
Agency                         Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S3-90/039

-------