United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
Atmospheric Research and
Exposure Assessment Laboratory
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
                   Research and Development
EPA/600/S3-90/054 Aug. 1990
&EPA         Project  Summary
                   Laboratory  Method to  Estimate
                   Hydrogen  Chloride Emission
                   Potential  Before  Incineration  of  a
                   Waste

                   Max R. Peterson, John R. Albritton, and R. K. M. Jayanty
                    A laboratory  method has  been
                  developed to provide an estimate of
                  the  amount of hydrogen chloride gas
                  that will form during incineration of a
                  waste. The method  involves heating
                  of a sample of the waste to 900°C in
                  a tube furnace, removal of particles
                  from the resulting gases by filtration
                  at 250°F (120°C), collection of hydro-
                  gen  chloride gas  in a water-filled
                  impinger,  and measurement of the
                  collected  HCI as chloride using  a
                  standard  ion chromatography/con-
                  ductimetric detection method. Dupli-
                  cate experimental runs were conduc-
                  ted  with quartz  and with INCONEL
                  components in  the furnace zone of
                  the  apparatus.  The  two materials
                  gave quite different  results,  which
                  indicates some surface phenomenon
                  may be involved.
                    Results with  quartz components
                  indicated that organochlorine is es-
                  sentially completely converted to HCI.
                  Very ionic  inorganic  chlorides (e.g.,
                  KCI  and NaCI) formed little or no HCI
                  when heated in  zero grade air (<3
                  ppm water  and  <1  ppm  total
                  hydrocarbon) but gave large amounts
                  of HCI  (20-80%  conversion)  if the
                  atmosphere  inside the apparatus
                  contained  2.4-5.0% water vapor,
                  which contains  hydrogen  for HCI
                  formation.  Results with less  ionic
                  inorganic chloride (FeCI3) and with
                  chlorine in a  positive oxidation state
                  (NaCIO solution) indicated significant
                  conversion to HCI,  especially in the
                  presence  of  hydrogen  from water
                  vapor. In all cases, the  presence of
water vapor increased the amount of
HCI formed, but INCONEL gave low
recovery of organohalogen as HCI.
    This Project Summary was devel-
oped by EPA's Atmospheric Research
and Exposure Assessment Laboratory,
Research  Triangle  Park, NC, to
announce key findings of the research
project that is fully documented in a
separate report of the same title (see
Project Report ordering information at
back).


Introduction
  Current U.S. EPA  regulations for
permitted hazardous waste incinerators
require  analysis of the waste feed for
total organochlorine content. At present,
no adequate analytical method is known
that will accomplish this. Furthermore, a
method  to measure hydrogen chloride
emission potential in waste feed would be
preferable since the purpose of the
regulations is to control emission of HCI.
  The  current method  assumes that
organochlorine is the dominant source of
HCI emissions  from hazardous  waste
incinerators.  Chlorine-containing organic
molecules contain  atoms of both  elem-
ents required to form hydrogen chloride:
For this reason,  chlorine-containing
organic compounds  form  HCI  when
burned  in air.1 Without a source of
hydrogen, inorganic chlorides do not
form HCI  when  heated  to  high
temperatures  in dry air. The result of
heating  an inorganic chloride to  high
temperature in the presence  of" a
hydrogen-containing species (e.g., water)

-------
apparently has not been  investigated in
previous work.
   The  ultimate  goal  of  the  work
described here is to develop a laboratory
method  to estimate,  from analysis of a
waste, the maximum  amount of  HCI that
could form during incineration of  that
waste, regardless of  the  chemical  envi-
ronment of chlorine  in the waste.  The
analytical approach chosen for evaluation
involved heating  a sample of  chlorine-
containing  waste  in  a  tube  furnace,
filtering particulate  chloride from the hot
gas  stream,  and trapping hydrogen
chloride  (HCI) gas  by  bubbling  the
filtered gas through water  in an impinger.
The  collected HCI was   measured  as
chloride  (CO by  ion  chromatography
(ICJfconductimetric analysis of the water
solution.
   Experimental  parameters evaluated
included the  effect on  HCI formation of
(1) the bonding environment of chlorine in
the waste, (2) the furnace temperature,
(3) the presence  of water vapor, and (4)
the composition of the components of the
furnace zone. A total of 35 experimental
runs were conducted.

Experimental  Procedures
   The following sections describe (1) the
laboratory apparatus, (2) the procedures
for injecting waste samples, and (3) the
collection and analysis of HCI samples.

Apparatus
   The laboratory apparatus used for the
study is  shown schematically in Figure 1.
The components  included (1) an  injection
assembly,  (2) a  furnace zone  (tube
furnace),  (3) a  heated filter zone  (to
remove paniculate matter), and (4) hydro-
gen chloride sample collectors.
   The injection assembly  consisted of a
movoablo  boat mechanism sealed inside
a  glass  housing  located immediately
upstream  from  the furnace zone.  The
design  of  this assembly  allowed  for
injection  of  a waste sample  into  a
completely sealed  system exposed  only
to the controlled atmosphere inside the
apparatus. The  boat  mechanism  was
made from either quartz or  INCONEL
components to match the composition of
the furnace  tube.  A hand-held  magnet
(outside the glass tube)  was used to push
the boat, which had a piece of magnetic
material on the  upstream end,  into the
furnace  zone and to withdraw it  after
volatilization and/or incineration of the
sample.
   The furnace zone  was  inside  a quartz
or INCONEL combustion  tube that was
healed in a tube  furnace.  Waste samples
were volatilized and/or thermally oxidized
in the furnace zone. Chlorine, if present in
the waste, then combined with hydrogen
to form hydrogen chloride.
   A thermocouple was used to deter-
mine temperature profiles of the furnace
zone  at  tube-center  temperatures  of
400°C and 900°C. The profiles indicate
that (1) the furnace zone was maintained
at  the desired temperature setting for at
least 1  in. on either side of the center and
(2) the temperature of the gas stream at
the exit of the tube  furnace was  greater
than 100°C. The latter condition prevent-
ed  condensation of water vapor during
transfer of gases to the heated filter zone.
   The heated filter zone was located im-
mediately  downstream  from the furnace
zone. The filter apparatus consisted of a
quartz-fiber filter  supported by  a per-
forated Teflon  disk  and was used  to
remove particulate material from gaseous
material. The filter apparatus was similar
to  the one used in U.S. EPA's Modified
Method 5 Sampling Train.2 The entire  fil-
ter apparatus and associated connectors
were housed in an insulated  box and
maintained at a temperature  of  250°F
(120CC)  to  prevent  condensation  of
gases.
   Sample  collectors were located
immediately downstream from the heated
filter zone.  The  filtered  gases were
bubbled through two  midget  impingers
connected in series. The first impinger
contained deionized  water to  remove
gaseous HCI; trie second, 0.1  N  NaOH
solution to  remove  any chlorine gas
present in  the gas stream.

Experimental Run  Procedure
   Several  initial  runs  using  quartz
components were  conducted  with  the
assembled apparatus  to  determine  op-
timum  sample  size (actually,  mass  of
chlorine which must  be injected to obtain
a reasonable percent recovery) and heat-
tracing requirements. Wastes  containing
organochlorine,  assumed  converted
completely to HCI when heated to  900°C,
were used to monitor accuracy (percent
recovery) as improvements were made in
the apparatus and as the chlorine  content
of the waste and the  injection volume
were adjusted to achieve acceptable
results.
   Each experimental run consisted of (1)
a single injection of a blank (referred to
as  the prerun  blank),  (2)  three  to five
separate injections of the waste, and (3) a
second injection of a blank (referred to as
the  postrun  blank). The  blanks were
made  up  of the  same matrix (ethanol
and/or water) as  the sample but
contained  no chlorine-containing species.
The prerun and postrun blanks were used
to monitor background concentrations of
HCI. Each injection (waste  or  blank)
generated  a single  liquid sample
(collected  in the  first impinger) that was
subsequently analyzed for chloride by 1C
with conductimetric detection.
   The procedure used for each injection
(waste or  blank)  into the  laboratory
apparatus is given in the full report.

Sample Preparation and
Analysis
   After volatilization and/or  incineration
of an  injection  of  material  (waste  or
blank), the deionized water  in the first
midget impinger  was analyzed for chlo-
ride on a Dionex  Model  14 ion chromato-
graph  with  conductimetric   detection.
Solutions to be analyzed were diluted, if
necessary,  to obtain a  CI"  concentration
in the  range of  0.06 to 15 ppm,  the
optimum  working  range  for  the
measurement method.  The  conductivity
meter had a detection limit of 0.01  ppm
cr.

Wastes Studied
   The compounds  selected  for  use in
synthetic  wastes  were  methylene
chloride,  an organohalogen  compound;
ferric chloride, a predominantly molecular
inorganic  compound;  and sodium
chloride and potassium chloride, two very
ionic inorganic compounds. In addition, a
solution of sodium hypochlorite was used
as a synthetic waste containing  chlorine
in a positive oxidation  state. Table  1
gives  the  composition  and chlorine
concentration of the  synthetic  wastes
used in the study.
   Two  real-world wastes were  used in
the study.  The  first was an aqueous
waste  containing  a large  amount  of
organochlorine.  The second was  also
aqueous and  contained  large amounts of
inorganic chlorine.
   For the  purposes of this  evaluation,
blank  values  were  determined   by
injecting pure ethanol or a water-ethanol
mixture,  as  appropriate,  into   the
apparatus and measuring the  background
CI' concentration in the water-impinger
solution.  Blanks  were  the  first and  last
injections of each experimental run. The
blank  value was  computed  as  the
average of the chloride concentrations
from  the  prerun  and  postrun blank
injections.

Tesf Atmospheres
   Four different test atmospheres were
investigated: (1) 100% zero grade air,  (2)
zero grade air containing 0.5% propane,
(3) zero grade air containing  2.4% water
vapor,  and (4) zero grade  air containing

-------
                                             Tube Furnace
                                             (900-1000 °C)
                                                                  II
                                                                                          Injection
                                                                                         Assembly
                                                                                              J	I
                                                                    Air
                           Sample
                          Collectors
Figure 1.  Laboratory apparatus used in the study.
Table 1. Synthetic Waste
Chlorine
Synthetic Concen-
Waste Composition tration
9.5%
WaC//H2O
11.8%
KC//H2O
6.6%
CH2CI2/EfOH
6.2%
FeCI3/H2O
4-6%
WaC/O/H2O
705 mg NaCI per
mL of H2O
134 mg KCI per
mL of H2O
56. 1 mg CH2CI2
per mL of EtOH
66.5" mg FeCI3
per mL of H2O
Unknown

5.8%

5.6%

5.5%

4.1%'



 ' Calculated from chloride concentration
  measured by ion chromatography.
5.0%  water vapor. The last three atmo-
spheres were investigated to determine if
the presence of  a  hydrogen-containing
species would  affect  the  recovery of
inorganic chlorine as HCI.
   An airflow of 200 mL/min was used to
sweep material  through the furnace tube
and sampling train. This flow rate gave a
residence time  of 3-4 sec in  the hottest
part  of  the tube. At the  900°C setting,
residence time in  the region  heated
above 700 °C was 8-10 sec.

Results and Discussion
   A  furnace tube and boat mechanism
made of quartz were used for all prelim-
inary runs.  The  test  atmosphere  was
100% zero grade air and the temperature
in the furnace zone was  900 "C. Results
of those runs  appeared  straightforward:
Organohalogen  was  converted to HCI;
inorganic  chloride  was  not. Runs  at
1000°C gave similar results.
   A gas-mixing system was then added
to the laboratory apparatus. It allowed the
preparation of a test atmosphere contain-
ing a small amount of propane (0.5%) in
zero grade air. Under the  new conditions,
30-50%  of  inorganic  chloride  was
converted to HCI.
   Other  hydrogen  sources  were then
considered because of the safety hazards
associated with handling  propane. Water
vapor was the  obvious choice. Approx-
imately 40% of inorganic  chloride  heated
in an atmosphere containing water vapor
was recovered as HCI. The  presence of
large amounts of HCI gas was confirmed
by gas-filter correlation infrared spectros-
copy (HCI analyzer). Likewise, 1C analysis

-------
 of an impinger solution from a laboratory
 run with  a  sodium  chloride  waste
 indicated 52.7% recovery of CI' as HCI,
 whereas analysis of the same solution by
 inductively  coupled  argon  plasma
 indicated only 3.8% recovery of Naf.
   Table 2 summarizes recovery of chlo-
 ride (from NaCI)  as HCI  with  furnace
 temperatures of 900 °C and 1000°C in (1)
 100%  zero grade  air, (2)  zero grade air
 containing  0.5% propane,  and (3) zero
 grade  air containing 2.4% water vapor.
 Tho concentrations of propane and water
 vapor  above  gave  approximately the
 same  concentration  of hydrogen  in the
 test atmosphere and gave  very  similar
 recoveries  of chloride as HCI. Increasing
 the  water  vapor concentration to  5.0%
 had no appreciable effect on recovery of
 chloride as HCI. Water vapor (2.4%) was
 used for all subsequent runs requiring a
 source of hydrogen.

 Table 2.  Recovery from Sodium Chloride at
         900"C and WOO°C
   Zero Grade Air     Mean Recovery of CI-
     Containing           as HCI
Propane
no
0.5%
no
Water
no
no
2.4%
900°C
0.6%
30.7%
38.5%
1000°C
5. 1%
48.5%
38.5%
   Addition of water vapor to the  test
atmosphere  led  to  problems  with  deg-
radation of quartz components. The boat
was a brownish-red at the end  of the
ferric chloride runs  presumably because
of the presence  of iron in the degraded
quartz. This provides additional evidence
that metal cations may remain, perhaps
as silicates, on the walls of the tube and
boat following conversion  of chloride to
HCI.
   A  furnace  tube  and boat made of
INCONEL 600 (76.0%  nickel,  15.5%
chromium, and 8.0% iron) were used to
determine if  HCI formation was affected
by the chemical composition of the tube
and  boat. Consequently,  experimental
runs with synthetic and real-world  wastes
were repeated  with INCONEL  com-
ponents.
   The INCONEL  tube  withstood  the
900°C temperatures  of  the furnace
without sagging. The interior of the tube
became discolored  after several runs.
The surface  of  the INCONEL boat
mechanism slowly  deteriorated  during
the study. The boat eventually became
pitted and   cracked,  and  material
resembling iron filings collected  in  the
tube. This material  was attracted to a
 magnet, the INCONEL components were
 not.
    Table 3 gives  the  results  of  all
 experimental runs at 900 °C  with quartz
 components and with INCONEL compo-
 nents,  with water vapor  present  and
 without. The following observations may
 be made about the results in Table 3.
 1.  Comparison of results with  and without
    a source of  hydrogen  (water vapor) in
    the test atmosphere:
    a. Predominantly  covalent  chlorine-
      containing compounds (CH2CI2 and
      FeCI3) gave  a higher  percent
      conversion of chlorine to HCI when
      water  vapor  was present in every
      experimental run except one.  The
      exception was CH2CI2  with  quartz
      components.
    b. Predominantly  ionic  chlorine-
      containing compounds  (NaCI  and
      KCI)  gave  a  higher  percent
      conversion of chlorine to HCI when
      water  vapor  was present  in every
      experimental run.
 2.  Comparison  of  results  with quartz
    components and with INCONEL com-
    ponents:
   a.  Predominantly covalent chlorine-
      containing compounds (CH2CI2 and
      FeCI3) gave a  higher  percent
      conversion of chlorine to  HCI with
      quartz components.
   b.  Predominantly  ionic chlorine-con-
      taining compounds (NaCI and KCI)
      gave a higher percent  conversion of
      chlorine  to  HCI with  INCONEL
      components.
 3. Comparison  of prerun  and postrun
   blank concentrations:
   a.  For 6 of the 15 quartz tube runs at
      900°C and 10 of the  17 INCONEL
      runs, the  HCI concentration of the
      blank at the end of  the  run was at
      least twice the concentration  of the
      blank at the beginning  of the run.
   b.  For  1   quartz  tube  run and   6
      INCONEL  runs,  the   HCI
     concentration of the blank at the
     end  of the run  was  lower  than the
     concentration of the blank at the
     beginning  of the run.

 Conclusions
   The results of this study have shown
 that formation of hydrogen chloride from
 incineration of a waste depends upon (1)
 the chemical bonding environment  of
 chlorine in the waste, (2) the presence of
 hydrogen in  the test atmosphere, and (3)
 the composition  of the walls  and other
 surfaces in the furnace zone.
   In a quartz tube, organochlorine tends
to  be completely converted to HCI and
does  not require an  external  source  of
 hydrogen. Heating of the organochlorine
 compound in an INCONEL 600 tube gave
 no measurable amount  of  HCI  in the
 collection impinger. Ionic inorganic chlo-
 ride is not converted to HCI, in quartz  or
 INCONEL 600, unless a source of hydro-
 gen (e.g., water vapor) is present. Ferric
 chloride  results more  closely resemble
 those obtained with  organochlorine than
 those obtained with very ionic chlorides.
   The presence of hydrogen (from water
 vapor) increased conversion  of inorganic
 chlorine  to HCI. This was true with both
 quartz and INCONEL components in the
 tube furnace.

 Recommendations
   The  purpose   of this  method
 development activity was  to develop  a
 procedure that would allow estimation  of
 the release of HCI during incineration of a
 hazardous waste feed stock.  This project
 showed that such a method is impractical
 since the conversion of inorganic chlo-
 rine-containing compounds  to  HCI   is
 incomplete and variable. Accordingly, it  is
 recommended that the  Agency can
 estimate  the maximum hydrogen chloride
 concentration  either  by assuming  total
 conversion of both organic and inorganic
 chlorides  to HCI or by making a direct
 stack gas measurement.
   To measure the  acid gas control
 device efficiency an  emission  test both
 before and  after the scrubber will be
 needed,  because estimates of the max-
 imum hydrogen chloride  emission from
 feed data will  lead to  overestimation  of
 scrubber efficiency.
   ,Many  additional  studies  could  be
 performed to  better  define the param-
 eters affecting the conversion  of chlorides
 to hydrochloric acid. Experiments on pilot
 and full-scale incinerators would be inter-
 esting and potentially  useful to regulators
 as well as those regulated. It  is currently
 thought,  however,  that the  conversion
 process is probably sensitive to enough
 parameters  that accurate quantitative
 prediction by any test method is unlikely.

 References
 1. Peterson, M. R., Gaskill, A., Jr., and
   Jayanty, R.  K. M. Total organohalogen
   (Phase I). EPA Contract Number 68-
   02-4442,  Work  Assignment  41,
   Research Triangle  Institute,  Research
   Triangle Park, North Carolina, 1988. 16
   pp.
2. U.S. EPA, Method 0010, Test methods
   for evaluating solid waste,  Vol. II field
   manual,  physical/chemical methods,
   3rd.  ed. EPA-SW-846.  U.S. Environ-
   mental  Protection Agency, Washing-
   ton, DC, 1986.35pp.

-------
Table 3. Recovery of Chlorine as HC
Mass Cl
Injected
Composition of Sample (mg)
6.6% CH2C\2/BOH 0.234
9.5% NaCI/H2O 0.319
11.8%KCI/H2O 0.319
6.2% FeC!3/H2O 0.436
4-6% NaOCI Soln. Unknown
Real-World Waste Unknown
(Organic)
Real-World Waste Unknown
(Inorganic)
:/af900°C
Water Quartz
Vapor Run Mass Cl Percent
Cone. No. Recovered (mg) Recovery (%)
0% 1 0.242 103.%
2.4% 2 0.1755 75.0%
0% 3 0.0063 2.0%
4 0.0018 0.55%
2.4% 8 0.1227 38.5%
0% 11 0.0018 0.56%
2.4% 12 0.0755 23.7%
0% 13 0.3349 76.8%
2.4% 14 0.4044 92.8%
2.4% 15 0.1442
0% 16 0.1810
2.4%
2.4% 18 0.0590

Run
No.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
30
31
32
33

34
35
INCONEL
Mass Cl
Recovered (mg)
0.0060
0.0023
0.0833
0.0949
0.1501
0.0160
0.1447
0.2649
0.266
0.0059
0.0593
0.0226
0.2969
0.2934

0.3191
0.0840

Percent
Recovery (%)
2.6%
1.0%
35.6%
40.6%
64.1%
5.0%
45.4%
83.1%
83.4%
1.8%
18.6%
5.2%
68.1%





-------

-------

-------
  Max R. Peterson John  R.  Albritton,  and R. K. M. Jayanty are with  Research
        Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park. NC 27709.
  Robert G. Fuerst is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
  The complete report, entitled "Laboratory Method to Estimate Hydrogen Chloride
        Emission Potential Before Incineration of a Waste," (Order No. PS 90-235
        854IAS; Cost: $15.00, subject to change)  will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S3-90/054

-------