United States
               Environmental Protection
               Agency
               Research and Development
 Atmospheric Research  and Exposure
 Assessment Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park NC 27711
 EPA/600/S3-90/059 Aug. 1990
EPA      Project Summary
                Estimation  of Seasonal  and
               Annual Acidic Deposition  through
               Aggregation of Three-Day
                Episodic Periods

              -R,erry,J.,Samsonr JeffreyB, Brook , and Sanfprci Sillman - _   ._  ,,r   ^ . _ ,...-
                  The Regional Acid Deposition Model
               (R ADM) simulates the complex physical
               and chemical processes involved in the
               formation of acidicdeposition. However,
               because of the complexity of RADM it
               has only been applied to selected epi-
               sodes of a few days duration. While the
               detail provided by RADM is highly desir-
               able to understand the interactions be-
               tween emissions and deposition on a
               storm-by-storm basis there is also a need
               for understand ing the probable long-term
               relationship between changing emission
               patterns and deposition.  The cost of
               simulating and interpreting seasonal or
               annual deposition patterns using RADM
               directly would be high.
                  A method for aggregating episodic
               deposition estimates has been devel-
               oped and used to identify meteorologi-
               cal situations which merit simulation by
               RADM based on their likelihood of pro-
               ducing sulfate (SO4=) wet deposition at
               multiple locations across eastern North
               America, their frequency of occurrence,
               and their seasonality. The aggregation
               approach is based on four years (1982-
               1985)  of meteorological and precipita-
               tion chemistry data.
                  The aggregation approach is based
               on the stratification of three-day periods
               into categories of similar 850 mb wind
               flow across eastern North America and
               subsequent selection of 30 RADM simu-
               lation  periods from this stratification
               which represent the range of storm pat-
               terns  present over eastern  North
               America.   The program has also pro-
               vided  the RADM project with scaling
               factors for use in weighing  episodic
 simulation results to seasonal and an-
 nual deposition. The method Is shown
 to improve upon the use of a random
 selection process in reproducing sea-
 sonal and annual wet deposition pat-
 terns.
    This Project Summary  was pre-
 pared by ERA'S Atmospheric Research
 and Exposure Assessment Laboratory,
 Research Triangle Park, NC, to announce
 keyfindingsof the research project that
 is fully documented in a separate report
 of the same title (see Project Report
 ordering Information at back).

 Introduction
    The development of policies  to ad-
 dress problems arising from acid deposition
 requires a thorough understanding of pro-
 cesses that affect acid deposition. To this
 end the United States Environmental Pro-
 tection Agency (EPA) has supported in-
 vestigations into the physics, chemistry and
 meteorology of acid deposition. These ef-
 forts have culminated in the development of
 the Regional Acid  Deposition Model
 (RADM), which simulates the processes
 involved in the emission, transport, trans-
 formation and removal of pollutants contrib-
 uting to acid deposition.
    The RADM will be used to assess the
 impact of different emissions control strate-
gies on the spatial patterns of acid deposi-
tion across eastern North America. The
 RADM is an episodic model, simulating
deposition on time scales of about 1 hour to
3 days. Acid deposition policy and assess-
ment issues, however, require deposition
pattern estimates on a seasonal and annual

-------
bases. Thus, it is necessary to establish a
relationship between individual deposition
events and the  long-term climatology of
acid deposition. The relationship between
Individual events and climatology is difficult
because deposition varies greatly from one
eventtothe next in terms of both the amount
of deposition and the relation between
deposition and emission sources. Estab-
lishment of long-term deposition patterns
and source-receptor relationships requires
analysis over an extended time period, pref-
erably Including  several years to account
for meteorological variability.
    The goal of this study  has been to
provide methods for representing aggre-
gate long-term patterns of acid deposition
from a finite  number of samples. These
methods involve both the selection of indi-
vidual deposition events which are repre-
sentative of recurring climatic patterns and
the calculation of climatic averages based
onthese events. The aggregation methods
have been applied to the specific problem of
representingtheclimatology of acid deposi-
tion based on in-depth analysis by RADM
for afinite sample of events. An array of 30
three-day events has been identified which
includes the major climatic patterns that
contribute to acid deposition over eastern
North America.  Assessment of the impact
of future changes in precursor emissions
will be performed by (1) using RADM to
predict impacts fprthe thirty sample events,
and (2) estimating long-term impacts by
aggregating  from the  30 sample events,
based on the techniques described  in this
report. While designed specifically in sup-
port of RADM the methods described here
may have broad applicability to other pollut-
ants and to problems that involve the
characterization of long-term climatic im-
pacts of human activities.

 Procedure
     Theaggregationtechnique is based on
the hypothesis that there  are  recurring
weatherpatternswhichcanbecharacterized
 and described in terms of observable me-
teorological parameters  (wind fields, pre-
 cipitation, etc.). It is further hypothesized
that distinct weather patterns will be asso-
 ciated with characteristic patterns of wet
 deposition, both in terms of spatial  extent
 and deposition amounts.  Given those as-
 sumptions,  long-term  wet deposition pro-
 cesses may be analyzed based on a finite
 numberof individual deposition events, each
 of which is "representative" of a major me-
 teorological category.  The goal of the ag-
 gregation project has  been to identify the
 degree to which weather patterns may be
 separated into identifiable categories and to
 assess how this information would improve
our ability to extrapolate case study results
to longer-term deposition estimates.
    The stratification of events into meteo-
rological categories is used both in the
selection of individual events for in-depth
analysis with  RADM and in the calculation
of aggregated estimates  for total  wet
deposition from 30-event samples.  Event
selection has been designed to include
representative episodes from all major me-
teorological categories and to insure that
the selected ensemble includes events with
significant wet deposition at sites through-
out eastern North America. Estimates for
long-term deposition  are  derived   from
known deposition rates (either from obser-
vations or from RADM analyses) forthe 30-
event sample.  The aggregation concept
represents long-term deposition as the sum
of deposition  from sample events weighted
by the  frequency of occurrence of each
meteorological category from which  they
were selected.  The aggregation  technique
has subsequently been modified to make
use of statistical correlations between wet
deposition, category and  other meteoro-
logical parameters  (precipitation, season,
etc.) in  deriving  estimates for  long-term
deposition.
     Testing  the aggregation technique
poses a special problem because the most
important issue, response of the method to
changes in precursor emission rates, can-
not  be tested empirically.  A  variety of
techniques have been used to explore ag-
gregation accuracy. These include the es-
tablishment  of statistical correlations be-
tween observed wet deposition, wind flow
pattern and other meteorological variables
and application of the aggregationtechnique
to  arrays  of randomly selected events.
 Discrepancies between aggregate  esti-
 mates and observed  deposition are com-
 pared to the natural uncertainty arisingfrom
year-to-year variation in  wet deposition.
 Lastly, an abbreviated model for source-
 receptor relationships is used  to identify
 similarities and differences between ran-
 domly selected 30-day ensembles and long-
term averages. These combined tests es-
tablish both the level of accuracy and limi-
 tations of the aggregation technique.
     Identification of representative deposi-
 tion events and methods of aggregation are
 based on meteorological and statistical
 analyses of deposition events that occurred
 over a 4-year period (1982-1985).  Events
 during this period  were divided into cat-
 egories with similar three-day patterns of
 850 mb wind flow across eastern North
 America.  The three-day time period and
 850 mb wind fields are broadly representa-
 tive of the  evolution of distinctive storm
 patterns that are likely to affect atmospheric
 transport and deposition rates. Events have
 been selected for analysis by RADM from
 among the meteorological strata based on
 their likelihood of producing sulfate (SO4=)
 wet deposition at multiple locations across
 eastern  North America, their frequency of
 occurrence, and their seasonality.

 Results and Discussion
     The following specific tasks have been
 completed as part of this project:

    1.  An extensive data base with daily
      precipitation and wet deposition of
      sulfate, nitrate and total  H+  was de-
      veloped.  The data base covered the
      years 1982-1985 and included 23 sites
      in  the  northeastern,  southern and
      midwestern  U.S.  and southern
	--Canada.  Meteorological information
      used in subsequent analysis was also
      collected.
    2. Techniques of cluster analysis were
      used to stratify 3-day events over the
      4-year period into categories  based
      on the meteorological data described
      above.  Four independent stratifica-
      tion schemes were  investigated:
      stratification by  850  mb wind field,
      stratification by 850 mb geopotential
      and mean surface pressure, stratifi-
      cation by 850mb temperature advec-
      tion and 500 mb vorticity, and stratifi-
      cation  by 500 mb vorticity advection
      and 850 mb relative humidity.  These
      four stratification schemes were
      evaluated to find the combination of
      meteorological parameters which best
      explained  variations  in sulfur  wet
      deposition.
     3. A set of 19 meteorological categories
      was compiled based on similarity in
      wind flow at 850 mb.  These 19 cat-
      egories were each subdivided  into
       "wet" and "dry" cases, making 38 cat-
       egories.  These  38 categories were
       used as the basis for  selection of
       individual days and derivation of ag-
       gregated estimates for annual depo-
       sition.
     4. Accuracy and validity of the 38-cat-
       egory stratification was evaluated
       based on the ability to predict  annual
       sulfate deposition  at eastern  and
       midwestern sites from afinite sample
       of 3-day events. We compared esti-
       mates for annual deposition derived
       from a random sample of 3-day events
       with estimates from a cluster-based
       sample of events. The standard de-
       viation between estimated and actual
       deposition was lower by 25%  with
       cluster-based selection.

-------
5. Selection of 30 individual 3-day events
  for  in-depth study with RADM was
  made. Selection of events was de-
  signed to satisfy the following criteria:

 a.  representation  of the meteorologi-
   cal categories that  account for the
   bulk of dry deposition in the eastern
   U.S.
 b.  Inclusion of days representing awide
   variety of circulation patterns, in-
   cluding relatively rare winter circula-
   tion patterns.
 c.  Inclusion of a number of days with
   very little wet deposition, to allow for
   simulation of dry deposition  pro-
   cesses.
 d.  Selection of individual events within
   each-category- by-a-*random-'"proi'-
   cess, ratherthan prescribing specific
   events.
 e.  Accurate representation of total an-
   nual deposition at all  northeastern
   and midwestern sites  from the en-
   semble of individual events.
      The selected ensemble allows for ac-
 curate estimation of summer, winter, and
 total annual deposition  at all sites in the
 northeast and midwest.

 Conclusions
      Analysis of observed wet deposition
 during the 1982-1985 time period shows
 that deposition rates are statistically corre-
 lated with meteorological  category  with
 greater than 95% confidence at most sites
 in eastern North America. The aggregation
 technique has been used to obtain estimates
 for annual deposition at 21 sites in eastern
 North America based solely on observed
 deposition during the selected 30-day en-
 semble. The resulting estimates differ from
 the observed 4-year average wet deposi-
^^oaby^arnp^inLs-Csmp^arableJp.npOTalyear-
 to-year variations.  Aggregated estimates
 based  on meteorological strata are more
 accurate than estimates from randomly se-
 lected events.
     The aggregation project has served
 two purposes:
     1. to provide the RADM project with a list
       of simulation periods which represent
       the range of storm patterns present
       over  eastern North America.  The
       selection of storm types was based on
       their likelihood of producing SO4= wet
       deposition at multiple locations across
       eastern North America, theirfrequency
       of occurrence, and their seasonably;
       and
     2. to provide the RADM project with scal-
       ing factors for use in weighing epi-
       sodic simulation results to seasonal
       and annual deposition.

     The aggregation methodology has po-
 tential application to other airpollution issues
 including regional oxidants  and regional
 aerosols.  Research is continuing to refine
The approach and to quantifyTts uncertainty
 and sensitivity, and to apply and test its
 performance for ambient concentrations as
 they impact dry deposition and visibility.
                                                                           . S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE-. 1990/748-012/20087

-------
Perry J. Samson, Jeffrey R. Brook and Sanford Sillman are with the Department of
  Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Ml
  48109-2143.
John F. Clarke is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
The complete report, entitled "Estimation of Seasonal and Annual Acidic Deposition
   through Aggregation of Three-Day Episodic Periods," (Order no. PB90-252 628/AS;
   Cost: $31.00 cost subject to change) will be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
 United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency
Center for Environmental
Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
 Official Business
 Penalty for Private Use $300
 EPA/600/S3-90/059

-------