United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
 Environmental Monitoring
 Systems Laboratory
 Las Vegas, NV 89193-3478
                    Research and Development
 EPA/600/S4-90/008 May 1990
SEPA          Project Summary
                    Field  Demonstration  for  Mobile
                    FT-IR for  Detection  of  Volatile
                    Organic  Chemicals

                    William G. Fateley, Robert M. Hammaker, and Donald F. Gurka
                     A  mobile  laboratory  is  now
                   available  to   measure  toxic
                   compounds in the atmosphere. The
                   mobility of this unit allows access to
                   many sites in  the continental United
                   States.  When this laboratory arrives
                   at a designated site, a high resolution
                   Fourier transform infrared  (FT-IR)
                   instrument is  used to  measure the
                   toxic materials,  or  volatile organic
                   compounds, in the atmosphere. The
                   site could  be  a  landfill,  lagoon,
                   industrial  site, chemical spill or any
                   area  where atmospheric pollution
                   occurs. The  FT-IR instrument is
                   capable of identifying and quantifying
                   atmospheric molecules at the  parts
                   per billion  (ppb) level. The  path
                   observed by this instrument could be
                   as  small as a few meters, or as  large
                   as  600 meters in length, nearly  2,000
                   feet. Recently, the chemicals emitted
                   at  an  industrial site  have  been
                   identified  at distances  of up to 0.3
                   mile.
                      This  Project Summary  was
                   developed by  EPA's Environmental
                   Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las
                   Vegas, NV, to announce key findings
                   of  the research  project that is fully
                   documented in a separate report of
                   the same title (see Project  Report
                   ordering information at back).

                   Discussion
                     The measurement of toxic compounds
                   in the atmosphere is simplified by the
                   fact that each compound  has a specific
                   spectral  "fingerprint."  The identification
                   of the various "fingerprints,"  or  com-
                   pounds,  can be routine  by FT-IR. The
                   measurement can  be made on the site,
or, should the situation necessitate it, at a
reasonable  distance downwind from the
site.
  The sensitivity and selectivity of FT-IR
methods for volatile organics is excellent
for low resolution  spectroscopy  and is
fully expected  to  be so for  high
resolution.  However, the  speed  and
economics  relative to conventional air-
toxic methods merits further scrutiny, and
Table 1  compares the analysis  time of
the  two  techniques.  In  addition to the
advantage of producing  near real-time
data, a major advantage of the long-path
FT-IR  approach  over  point  sample
collection/analysis techniques is the cost
effectiveness. Most air pathway analyses
(APA) at Superfund sites use the point
sampling approach in  spite  of  the
dynamic nature of air masses. Many
samples  are collected and  analyzed to
compensate  for  this  temporal variability
but not without a considerable expendi-
ture  of time  and  money  ($500-
1000/sample).
  This study has demonstrated  that this
FT-IR system can be used to detect toxic
compounds in the atmosphere  over a
Superfund site. Within a matter of hours
after the van arrives on a site, qualitative
and quantitative  information on toxic
atmospheric  compounds  can  be
available. From  this information one can
make recommendations for additional
monitoring studies, removal or remedial
action,  and  determine if  pre-established
safety  levels are  being exceeded. This
mobile laboratory enhances the capability
of present and future site assessment.
  Performance  of the spectrometer is
presented in Table 2. The table provides
wave numbers  of  peaks used  for

-------
              Table 1.     Comparison of Analysis Times per Canister and for Open-Path Infrared Methods3
                                   Sample Collection        Cryofocus                          Minimum-Maximum
                                        Time,             Desorption,        Instrument Time,          Time,
                                         Hrs                Mins               Mins                Wins
Canister
FT-IR
0-24*>
0
10-30
0
45
5-60°
25-80
5-60
              0 Multiple canister analyses are required to profile a field site.
              b To completely fill canister. Zero indicates almost instantaneous sample collection.
              ° Dependent on ambient pollutant concentrations, spectral complexity, and operator skill.
identification and quantitative determina-
tion  of volatile organics,  the  spectral
resolution obtained  in  the transformed
spectra, and the detection limit for most
compounds  at a path length  of  100
meters. The compounds include a variety
of  purgable  halogen  containing
compounds and  purgable  aromatics
measured by current  EPA methods,  as
well  as non-purgables (e.g., n-butanol,
1,4-dioxane and ethyl   acetate)  not
amenable to standard methods.

-------
Table 2.      Estimated Detection Limits (ppb) for Some Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) at
              a Path Length of 100 Meters Using an Appropriate Absorption Band from the Mid-
              Infrared Region
Compound
Chlorinated hydrocarbons
Allyl chloride
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
.Arornatic hydrocarbons
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Pyridine
Toluene
Alkane
Cyclopentane
Alcohols
n-Butanol

Ethanol
Isopropanol

Methanol

Ketones
Acetone
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobytyl ketone
Wavenumber
(cnr1)

756.9
795.2
741.2
772.6
731.3
749.5
916.3
726.3
849.4
	
673.9
2794.0
700.3
694.3

2966.0

2967.4
7068.8
7066.7
2982.7
956.5
7033.4
7033.4

7277.7
7774.2
2965.4
Resolution
(cm-1)

0.5
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5

0.1
0.5
0.1
0.1

0.5

0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.5

0.5
0.5
0.5
Detection Limit
(Ppb)a

67
6.3
26
b
34
20
19
8.1
18

c
37
c
c

7.2

22.4
35
37
79
76
78
8.7

36
40
78
£sfer

     Ethyl acetate
Ethers
1241.4
                        0.5
                                               5.0
Diethyl ether
1,4-Dioxane

Tetrahydrofuran

1142.9
2863.1
1138.3
2981.7
7084.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
9.3
77
9.9
77
26
a These detection limits, using concentration in parts per billion (ppb), are for P = 740 torr and
 T = 298 K.
b These measurements are being repeated.
0 These bands fall in spectral regions containing sharp water vapor absorption bands, and the detection
 limits are dependent on humidity.

-------
  William G.  Fateley and Robert M, Hammaker are with Kansas State University,
        Manhattan, KS 66506. Donald F. Gurka (also the EPA Project Officer, see
        below) is with Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas,
        NV 89193-3478.
  Tha complete report, entitled  "Field Demonstration for Mobile FT-IR for
        Detection of Volatile Organic Chemicals," (Order No.  PB 90-192 014/AS;
        Cost: $23.00, subject to change) will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA 22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Las Vegas, NV 89193-3478
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S4-90/008

-------