United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory
Las Vegas, NV 89193-3478
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/S4-90/014Sept. 1990
&EPA          Project  Summary

                    Proximity  of  Texas  Sanitary
                    Landfills  to  Wetlands and
                    Deepwater  Habitats
                    V.W. Lambou, R.C. Herndon, J.E. Moerlins and R.L. Gebhard
                      Sanitary landfills can cause  con-
                   siderable harm to sensitive ecosys-
                   tems if they are not properly located,
                   designed, and managed. The purpose
                   of these reports is to summarize the
                   proximity of  463 sanitary landfills in
                   Texas  to wetlands  and deepwater
                   habitats (i.e., rivers, lakes, streams,
                   bays,  etc.); and to present data on
                   individual landfills.  The  sanitary
                   landfills were identified on U.S. Fish
                   and Wildlife  Service's  National  Wet-
                   lands Inventory  (NWi) maps.  The
                   nearness or proximity of the sanitary
                   landfills to wetlands and  deepwater
                   habitats was determined by drawing
                   three  concentric regions around the
                   point  representing the location  of
                   each  landfill.  The  radii  of the
                   concentric regions were: 1/4 mile, 1/2
                   mile,  and  1  mile.  Due to the sig-
                   nificant variation  in  environmental
                   settings across Texas as well as the
                   availability of NWI  maps, the state
                   was divided into 4 regions. Almost all
                   of the sanitary landfills included  in
                   this  study  are located  close to
                   wetlands and many of the  sanitary
                   landfills are  located close to deep-
                   water  habitats. These facilities  have
                   the potential  to  adversely affect
                   sensitive ecosystems,  such as wet-
                   lands  and deepwater habitats, either
                   through habitat alterations or through
                   the migration of contaminants  from
                   sanitary landfills.  There  are other
                   considerations, besides the common-
                   ness  of wetlands  in an  area, that
                   determine how close a sanitary land-
                   fill is located to wetlands.
                      This  Project  Summary  was
                   developed by EPA's Environmental
Monitoring Systems  Laboratory,  Las
Vegas, NV, to announce key findings
of the research project that is fully
documented  in two separate reports
of the sjme  title  (see Project Report
ordering information at back).

Introduction
   Sanitary landfills, as typically defined,
are waste-management facilities regu-
lated under Subtitle D of  the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
These facilities are  commonly referred to
as municipal waste landfills and they are
primarily used  to receive  household
refuse and nonhazardous commercial
waste. However, sanitary  landfills also
receive other types of Subtitle  D  waste,
such as  sewage sludge  and industrial
wastes. Sanitary  landfills typically receive
some hazardous waste in the form of
household hazardous  waste,  and haz-
ardous waste  from small-quantity gen-
erators as defined in 40 CFR Part  261.10
(Definitions).  Depending  upon  the
definition of a sanitary landfill used by the
individual states, there are between 6,500
and 9,300 of these facilities permitted in
the United States.
   Sanitary  landfills can cause consid-
erable harm  to  sensitive ecosystems  if
they are  not properly located, designed,
and managed. These facilities have the
potential  to adversely affect sensitive
ecosystems,  such as wetlands and
deepwater habitats, either through  habitat
alterations or  through  the migration of
contaminants from  sanitary landfills. In
order to evaluate the seriousness  of this
problem,  information  is needed on the
nearness of sanitary landfills to wetlands
and surface water bodies The purpose of

-------
this study is to document the proximity of
sanitary landfills  in the state of Texas to
wetlands and  deepwater  habitats  (i.e.,
rivers, lakes, streams, bays, etc.).

Materials and Methods
   The source of data used to determine
the locations of the sanitary landfills was
the computer data file developed by
Development  Planning and  Research
Associates, Inc.  (DPRA) for use  by the
U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency's
Office of Solid Waste in its RCRA Subtitle
D  program. The  DPRA data file includes
information on 7,683 sanitary landfills,
and 6,849 of these facilities have latitude
and  longitude coordinates  in  degrees,
minutes, and  seconds specified  in  the
data file. Each set of coordinates defines
a point  which  represents the geographic
location of  a sanitary landfill. In addition,
the data file  contains the names of the
landfills and data on the cities or counties
in  which the  landfills  reside.  Individual
states  are responsible  for  permitting
sanitary landfills  under Subtitle  D  of
RCRA  and, since  DPRA  obtained  the
information for the data file from state
sources, the  site  location information
varies in terms of accuracy and the point
chosen  to represent the location of each
facility
   Wetlands  typically  form part of  a
continuous transition  zone   between
uplands and  open water.  Therefore, the
delineation of  the upper and lower
boundaries in any  wetland definition is
somewhat arbitrary. There are a number
of  definitions  of wetlands that have been
developed  for use  in classifying  natural
environments or  for regulatory purposes
While these definitions are not identical,
they are very  similar.  The selection of  a
specific definition  for use  in  this  study
was  determined  by the  availability  of
national wetlands and deepwater habitats
geographic data.
   The most extensive, consistent source
of  wetlands  and deepwater  habitats
geographic data  is the  U.S.  Fish  and
Wildlife  Service's  National  Wetlands
Inventory (NWI).  The NWI has  developed
detailed,  large-scale  maps  for  a
significant portion  of the  United  States.
To date,  wetland maps  have  been
developed  for approximately 40 percent
of  the contiguous 48 states, 10 percent of
Alaska,  and all  of  Hawaii.  Large-scale
NWI maps typically are  either 1:24,000
scale or 1:63,360  scale U.S. Geological
Survey quadrangle maps, however, most
are  1:24,000  scale.  Wetlands  and
deepwater habitats are delineated on the
NWI maps. The delineation of wetlands
and deepwater habitats was developed
using remote  sensing  techniques and
field investigations.  The  NWI  maps are
developed  in  accordance  with the
National  Map  Accuracy  Standard
(NMAS).  The NWI 1:24,000 scale maps
used  in  this  study  are  accurate,
according to the NMAS, to within  40 feet
of ground measurements.  These  maps
were  particularly  useful  for plotting the
location  of  sanitary  landfills  and for
determining the  proximity  of  these
facilities  to wetlands  and deepwater
habitats
   The NWI  maps use the definitions and
the classification system for wetlands and
deepwater habitats  developed by the
U.S  Fish and Wildlife Service  (Cowardin
et al.,  1979. Classification  of  Wetlands
and  Deepwater Habitats of the  United
States. FWS/OBS-79/31. 103 pp.).  Wet-
lands are defined as  lands transitional
between  terrestrial and  aquatic systems
where the water table is usually at or near
the surface, or the land is covered by
shallow water.  Deepwater  habitats are
defined as  permanently flooded  lands
lying  below  the  deepwater boundary  of
wetlands.  See Cowardin et al.  for  more
expansive definitions and an explanation
of the definitions, as well as the boundary
limits.
   The U.S. Fish and  Wildlife  Service's
classification of wetlands and deepwater
habitats is hierarchical in nature proceed-
ing from  general to specific. There are  5
systems,  10 subsystems, and 55 classes.
In this study only the "system,"  i.e, the
complex   of wetlands  and deepwater
habitats that share the influence  of similar
hydrologic, geomorphologic, chemical, or
biological  factors,  was  used  for
classification purposes.
   Each sanitary landfill included  in this
study was located on  NWI large-scale
maps using  standard  cartographic  tech-
niques. Nearness or proximity of sanitary
landfills to wetlands and  deepwater hab-
itats was  determined  by drawing three
concentric regions  around  the  point
representing the location of each  landfill.
The radii  of  the concentric regions were:
1 4 mile,  1/2 mile, and 1  mile. The occur-
rence or  nonoccurrence of  the  wetlands
and deepwater  habitat systems in  each
concentric region was then recorded.
   Many  sanitary landfills are typically of
the order of  100 acres in  size. For
example,  in the state of Florida  about 35
percent of the active sanitary landfills are
between  50  and 150 acres in  size, with
the average size being 110 acres (Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation,
1987). A  landfill that is 100  acres  in size
and  uniformly  distributed  about its
latitude/longitude  point  designation will
have a  radius of approximately  1/4 mile
and, therefore,  will approximate  the
boundary of the first concentric  1/4-mile
radius  region. Undoubtedly, most of the
landfills  located in a  1/4-mile radius
region  containing  either  wetlands  or
deepwater habitats should be considered
to be located in wetlands  or  deepwater
habitats. Since landfills vary considerably
in size and  shape,  some of the landfills
located  in the 1/2-mile radius and 1-mile
radius  regions  containing wetlands  or
deepwater habitats  will probably also  be
located  in  wetlands or deepwater
habitats. The exact  geographic boundary
of the  landfill  is  not the critical consid-
eration for determining  adverse  impacts
associated  with  these facilities,  since
contaminants  can  migrate  off-site  to
affect wetlands and deepwater habitats.
   Due  to the  significant variation  in
environmental  settings across Texas  as
well as the availability of NWI maps, the
state was divided into regions:  Region  1 -
Coastal, Region  2 -  Northeastern, Region
3 - Panhandle, and  Region 4 -  Central.
Figure  1  identifies the four  regions of the
state of  Texas  as  delineated  for this
report.  Regions  1,  2, and  3  have been
completely mapped by the NWI and, as a
result data are presented on the  sanitary
landfills located  in these regions. Region
4 has not been mapped by the NWI and,
therefore, data are not presented for the
sanitary  landfills  located in this region.
Data are reported individually for  Regions
1, 2, and 3  and  are aggregated for the
entire state.
   Region 1  (Coastal)  consists of  the
coastal  areas of the  state  where  the
greatest  concentrations of  wetlands  oc-
cur.  There  are  119 sanitary  landfills
included in  Region  1. Region   2
(Northeastern)  includes  the  eastern
portion  of the  state,  while  Region  3
(Panhandle)  includes  the Texas  pan-
handle area and  a small area in the west-
central portion of the state. There are 264
and 80 sanitary landfills in Regions 2 and
3, respectively.  Region 4  (Central)  in-
cludes  the  central  and  west-central
portions  of  the  state.  There  are  463
sanitary landfills in Region 4.

Results and Discussion
   We obtained  data on the proximity o!
463 sanitary landfills located in Region 1
(Coastal),  Region 2  (Northeastern), anc
Region  3 (Panhandle)  of Texas  to  wet-
lands  and  deepwater habitats.  This
includes all the sanitary landfills  in  these
regions for which  location  data are
available.  We  were  not able  to obtair
data on  the proximity of the 463  sanitary
landfills  located  in Region  4 (Central) tc

-------
                                                                                           Regions

                                                                                     Coastal,  Southeastern
                                                                                 1  = 119 landfills
                                                                                     NWI Maps Available

                                                                                     Northeastern
                                                                                 2 = 264 Landfills
                                                                                     NWI Maps Available

                                                                                     Panhandle, Westcentral
                                                                                 3  = 80 Landfills
                                                                                     NWI Maps Available

                                                                                     Central,  Westcostal
                                                                                 4  = 463 Landfills
                                                                                     No NWI Maps Available
                         T
Figure 1.  Four regions of Texas delineated for this report.
wetlands  and deepwater habitats.  There
are 926  sanitary  landfills in the  DPRA
data file for  the state of Texas and 463
(50 percent)  of these facilities have NWI
maps available for site interpretation. As
a  result,  463 (50  percent)  of the  926
sanitary landfills in the state of Texas are
not included  in this study.
   Approximately 73  percent of the san-
itary landfills are located in or within 1/4
mile of wetlands, while 93 and 99 percent
are located in or within 1/2 and 1 mile of
wetlands,  respectively  (Figure  2).  Only
four (1 percent) of the landfills are located
more than a mile  from any type of wet-
land.  Most sanitary  landfills are located
either in  or are close to Palustrine wet-
lands (approximately  71, 92, and 99 per-
cent are located in or within  1/4, 1/2, and
1 mile,  respectively, of a Palustrine wet-
land).
   There  are some differences among
the three  regions of Texas in the relative
proximity  of sanitary landfills to wetlands
(Figure  3); however,  most of  the  differ-
ences are relatively small. It  is surprising
that 83 percent of  the sanitary landfills in
Texas  Region  2  (Northeastern)  are
located  in or within 1/4 mile of wetlands
as  compared to 64  percent in  Texas
Region 1  (Coastal) with its large expanse
of coastal wetlands.  It is  also interesting
that 51   percent  of  the facilities  are
located  in or within 1/4 mile of wetlands
in Texas  Region 3 (Panhandle) which is
located  in the more inland and arid por-
tion of Texas.  Only  approximately  one-
fourth  of all  the sanitary landfills are
located  more  than  1/4  mile  from  a
wetland. Twenty, 6 and 1  percent are
located 1/4 to 1/2, 1/2 to 1 mile, and more
than one mile,  respectively, from the
closest wetland.
   Approximately  12  percent  of the
sanitary  landfills are located  in or within
1/4 mile of  deepwater  habitats, while 22
and  38 percent are located in or within
1/2 and  1  mile of  deepwater habitats,
respectively (Figure  4). Approximately 62
percent  (i.e.,  289)  of  the landfills are
located more  than a mile  from any type
of deepwater habitat. Most of the facilities
that  are  located in  or  that are close to
deepwater  habitats are  in  the vicinity of
Riverine  or Lacustrine  deepwater habitats
(i.e., 23 percent are  located in  or within 1
mile of a Riverine deepwater  habitat and
21 percent are located in or within  1 mile
of a Lacustrine deepwater habitat).
   There are  some differences  among
the three regions of  Texas in  the  relative
proximity of sanitary  landfills to  deep-
water  habitats (Figure  5). As expected,
Region 3 (Panhandle), located  in the
more  arid  portion  of  Texas, has the
smallest  percentage of  facilities located
close  to deepwater habitats.  Region  1
(Coastal) and Region 2 (Northeastern) are
similar in the  proximity of  facilities to
deepwater habitats. Overall, relatively few
of the  facilities are  located  less  than  1
mile from a deepwater habitat;  12, 10,
and 16 percent are located less than 1/4
mile, 1/4 to  1/2 mile, and  1/2 to  1  mile,
respectively, from the closest deepwater
habitat.
   Approximately 75 percent  of the
sanitary  landfills are  located  in or within
1/4 mile of either wetlands or deepwater
habitats, while  94 and  99 percent are
located in or within  1/2 and 1  mile  of
either  wetlands  or deepwater habitats,
respectively  (Figure  6).  Only  four  (1
percent) of the  landfills are located  more
than  a mile  from  either  wetlands  or
deepwater habitats.  Most of the sanitary
landfills are located either in or are  close
to Palustrine or  Riverine habitats (approx-
imately  71, 92,  and  99  percent are
located in  or within 1/4,  1/2,  and 1  mile,
respectively, of  a  Palustrine  deepwater
habitat while approximately  10,  22, and
35  percent are  located in or  within 1/4,
1/2, and  1  mile,  respectively,  of  a
Riverine  habitat).  Only  approximately
one-fourth  of  the sanitary landfills are
located more than 1/4 mile from either a
wetland or deepwater habitat. Nineteen,
5, and 1  percent are  located 1/4 to 1/2
mile, 1/2 to 1 mile, and more than 1  mile,
respectively,  from  either  the  closest
wetland or deepwater habitat.
   There  are  some differences  among
the three regions of Texas in  the relative
proximity  of sanitary  landfills to either
wetlands or deepwater  habitats  (Figure
7);  however, most of the  differences are
relatively small.  Region 2  (Northeastern)
has the  largest  percentage of facilities
located  close  to  either wetlands  or
deepwater habitats,  while   Region  3

-------
                        All Systems
                            Marine
                          Estuarine
                           Riverine
                         Lacustrine
                         Palustrine
                                                       40        60

                                                         Percent
Figure 2.  Proximity of 463 sanitary landfills in Texas to wetlands.
                         Fi  In or within 1 Mile

                             In or within 1/2 Mile

                             In or within 1/4 Mile
                                                                                        99
                                         100
(Panhandle) has the smallest percentage
of facilities  located  close  to  either
wetlands or deepwater habitats. Region 2
(Northeastern) has the largest percentage
of facilities  located  close  to  either
Palustrine  and  Lacustrine wetlands or
deepwater habitats,  and  Region  1
(Coastal) has  the largest  percentage of
facilities  located close to either Riverine
and  Estuarine  wetlands  or  deepwater
habitats.
Conclusions

   Almost  all  of  the sanitary  landfills
included in  this study are  located  in or
are close to wetlands and  many of the
sanitary  landfills  are located  close to
deepwater  habitats.  From  this, we
conclude  that  these facilities have the
potential to adversely affect  these sen-
sitive ecosystems,  either through habitat
alterations  or  through the  migration of
contaminants from  sanitary landfills. This
study did  not  acquire data  that  would
elucidate why sanitary landfills are close
to wetlands.  However,  since a  large
percentage of facilities in  the more inland
and arid Region  3  (Panhandle) of  Texas
are located in  or are  close to wetlands,
we conclude that there are considerations
other  than  the  commonness of wetlands
in an area, that  determine how close a
sanitary landfill is located  to wetlands.
                                                 < 1/4 Mile

                                                 1/2-1 Mile
                        1/4-1/2 Mile

                        > 1 Mile
                       Whole State (463)
                 Region 1 (Coastal) (119)
            Region 2 (Northeastern) (264)
               Region 3 (Panhandle) (80)
                                       0        20      40       60        80       100
                                                          Percent
Figure 3.  Comparison of the distance of sanitary landfills to the closest wetland in the various regions in Texas.

-------
                           All Systems
                               Marine
                             Estuarine
                              Riverine
                            Lacustrine
                                                      21
                                                11
In or within 1 Mile
In or within 1/2 Mile
In or within 1/4 Mile
                                       0
                                                  20
                                                             40          60
                                                               Percent
Figure 4.  Proximity of 463 sanitary landfills in Texas to deepwater habitats.
              80
                         100
                                                  <  1/4 Mile
                                                  1/2-1 Mile
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
> 1 Mile
                      Whole State (463)
                Region 1 (Coastal) (119)
           Region 2 (Northeastern) (264)
              Region 3 (Panhandle) (80)
                                                  20        40        60        80       100
                                                              Percent
Figure 5.  Comparison of the distance of sanitary landfills to the closest deepwater habitat in the various regions.in Texas.

-------
                         All Systems
                                                                        In or within 1 Mile

                                                                        In or within 1/2 Mile

                                                                        In or within 1/4 Mile
                          Lacustrine
                           Palustrine
                                                                                            99
                                               20
                                                          40         60        80
                                                            Percent
                                                                                          100
Figure 6.  Proximity of 463 sanitary landfills in Texas to either wetlands or deepwater habitats.
                         Whole State (463)
                   Region 1 (Coastal) (119)
              Region 2 (Northeastern) (264)
                 Region 3 (Panhandle) (80)
                                                     < 1/4 Mile        £31/4-1/2 Mile

                                                     1/2-1 Mile       M  > 1 Mile
                                                                                 80       100
                                           0        20       40       60
                                                                Percent

Figure 7.  Comparison of the distance of sanitary landfills to the closest wetland or deepwater habitat in the various regions in Texas.

-------

-------
  V.W. Lambou (also the EPA Project Officer see below), is with  Environmental
        Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas,  NV 27711; R.C. Herndon and
        J.E. Moerlins are with State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; and R.L.
        Gebhard is with U.S. Fish and Wildlife, St. Petersburg, FL 33702.
  The complete reports, entitled  "Proximity of Texas  Sanitary Landfills  to Wetlands
        and Deepwater Habitats: Data on Individual  Landfills," (Order No. PB 90-
        251 851/AS; Cost: $23.00,  subject to change) and  "Proximity of Texas
        Sanitary  Landfills to Wetlands and Deepwater  Habitats:  Statewide
        Results," (Order No. PB 90-251 869/AS; Cost: $15.00, subject to change)
        will be available only from:
            National Technical Information Service
            5285 Port Royal Road
            Springfield, VA22161
            Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
            Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Las Vegas, NV 89193-3478
United States                   Center for Environmental Research
Environmental Protection         Information
Agency                         Cincinnati OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300

EPA/600/S4-90/014

-------