United States
                      Environmental Protection
                      Agency
Office of Health and
Environmental Assessment
Washington DC 20460
                      Research and Development
EPA/600/S8-91/042 July 1991
v/EPA        Project  Summary
                      Updated  Health  Effects
                      Assessment  Documents
                        An updated series of Health Effects
                     Assessment (HEA) documents were pre-
                     pared by the Environmental Criteria and
                     Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH, for
                     the Office of Emergency and Remedial
                     Response. These documents update 15
                     of the 1984 HEAs and  are brief, sum-
                     mary assessments of potential adverse
                     health effects following either oral or
                     inhalation exposure for the purpose of
                     remedial actions.
                        This  Project  Summary was devel-
                     oped by EPA's Environmental Criteria
                     and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH,
                     to announce key findings of the research
                     project that Is fully documented in sepa-
                     rate reports (see Project Report order-
                     Ing Information at back).

                     Introduction
                        These reports summarize and evaluate
                     information relevant to a preliminary in-
                     terim assessment of adverse health ef-
                     fects associated with specific chemicals
                     and compounds. All estimates of accept-
                     able intakes and carcinogenic potency pre-
                     sented  in this document should  be
                     considered as preliminary and reflect lim-
                     ited resources  allocated  to this project.
                     Pertinent toxicologic and environmental
                     data were located through  on-line  litera-
                     ture searches of the TOXLINE, CANCER-
                     LINE and the CHEMFATE/DATALOG data
                     bases. Secondary sources of information
                     have also been relied upon in the prepara-
                     tion of these reports and  represent  large-
                     scale health assessment efforts that entail
                     extensive peer and Agency review.
 Discussion
    The intent in these assessments is to
 suggest acceptable exposure levels when-
 ever sufficient data were available. Val-
 ues were not derived or larger uncertainty
 factors were employed when the variable
 data were  limited in  scope tending to
 generate conservative (i.e., protective)
 estimates. Nevertheless, the interim val-
 ues presented reflect the relative degree
 of  hazard associated with exposure or
 risk to the chemical(s) addressed.
    Whenever possible, two categories of
 values have been estimated for systemic
 toxicants (toxicants for which cancer is not
 the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDs
 (formerly AIS—Acceptable Intake Sub-
 chronic) or subchronic reference dose, is
 an estimate of an exposure level that would
 not be expected to cause adverse effects
 when  exposure occurs during  a limited
 time interval (i.e., for an interval that does
 not constitute a significant portion of the
 lifespan). This type of exposure estimate
 has not been extensively used, or rigor-
 ously defined, as  previous risk assess-
 ment efforts have been primarily directed
 towards exposures from toxicants in ambi-
 ent air or water where lifetime exposure is
 assumed. Animal data used for RfDs esti-
 mates  generally include exposures  with
 durations of 30-90 days. Subchronic hu-
 man data are rarely available.  Reported
 exposures are usually from  chronic occu-
 pational exposure  situations or from re-
 ports of acute accidental exposure. These
 values are developed for both inhalation
 (RfDsl) and oral (RfDso) exposures.
                                                                       Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
    The RfD (formerly AIC - Acceptable
 Intake Chronic) is similar in concept and
 addresses chronic exposure. It is an esti-
 mate of an  exposure  level that would not
 be expected to cause adverse effects when
 exposure occurs for a  significant portion of
 the lifespan. The RfD  is route-specific and
 estimates acceptable  exposure for either
 oral (RfD0) or inhalation (RfD,)  with the
 implicit assumption that exposure by other
 routes is insignificant.
    Composite scores  (CSs) for noncar-
 cinogens have also been calculated where
 data permitted. These values are used for
 ranking reportable quantities.
    For compounds for which there is suffi-
 cient evidence of card nog enicity, RfDs and
 RfD values are  not  derived.  Since the
 Agency's cancer  policy assumes a pro-
 cess that is not characterized by a thresh-
 old, any exposure contributes an increment
 of risk. Consequently, derivation  of these
 values would  be  inappropriate.  For car-
 cinogens, q,*s have been computed based
on oral and/or inhalation data if available.
The  qt* represents an  upper-bound esti-
mate on lifetime cancer risk as estimated
by the multi-stage model.
   Inhalation values (RfDsl, RfD,, and q,*)
have been developed for purposes of in-
halation exposure evaluations only. These
values do not reflect differential absorption
assumptions appropriate for route-to-route
extrapolation. These estimates have been
developed  to be  readily transposable  to
units of air concentration and have incor-
porated an assumption that exposure con-
centration  will be relatively stable across a
24-hour period.
   The primary locus of the brief literature
summaries presented in the HEAs is litera-
ture  directly relevant to hazard assess-
ment, primarily  mammalian  toxicologic
evaluations of subchronic or chronic dura-
tion  conducted utilizing oral or inhalation
exposure protocols. The HEAs generally
reflect secondary sources of information
when available in the form of more exten-
sive  agency documentation.
Conclusion
   Table  1 summarizes the  risk as-
sessments developed in each docu-
ment. IMPORTANT REMINDER! These
assessments  were prepared  in 1988-
1989 and may have been superseded
by more recent documentation. Please
refer to the following references for the
most current information.
     U.S. EPA Health Effects Assessment
     Summary  Table. Available from the
     National Technical Information  Ser-
     vice,  Springfield, VA, at  703/489-
     4807. Order Number PB91-921100.
     (This Table is updated quarterly, ev-
     ery three months.)
     U.S. EPA Integrated Risk Informa-
     tion System  (IRIS). Available online
     from  the  National Library of
     Medicine's Toxicology Data Network
     (TOXNET) and  from the  National
     Technical  Information  Service,
     Springfield, VA, at 703/489-4807. Or-
     der Number PB90-591330. (This data
     base is updated quarterly, every three
     months.)
Table 1. Summary of Risk Assessments
Chemical(s) RfDso RfD0
(mg/day) (mg/day)
Acetone
Benzene

Cadmium
Carbon Tetrachloride

Chlordane

Chlorobenzene
Chloroform

DDT
Methylene Chloride

Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Naphthalene
Phenol
Tetrachloroethylene


Trichloroethylene

Xylene
70
ND

NA
0.5*

ND

14
ND

ND
ND

32
29
42
ND


ND

250
7
ND

0.04
0.05'

ND

1.4
ND

ND
ND

3
29
42
ND


ND

126
RfDsl
(mg/day)
ID
ND

ND
ND

ND

3
ND

ND
ND

64
ID
ID
ND


ND

&>
RfD,
(mg/day)
ID
ND

ND
ND

ND

0.3
ND

ND
ND

6
ID
ID
ND


ND

6f
CS
6.5
ND

ND
ND

ND

8
ND

ND
ND

9.6
13.2
44
ND


ND

10
Q/*
(mg/kg/day) '
ID
2.9x10 *-oral
2.9x10 *-inhal.
6. 1-inhal.
1. 3x1 01 -oral
5.2x10 2-inhal.
1.3-oral
1.3-inhal.
ID
6.1x10*-oral
8.1x10 *-inhat.
0.34-oral
7.5x10 *-oral
1.4x10 *-inhal.
ID
ID
ID
5.1x10 '-oral
2.85x10 -> to
9.47x10 7-inhal.
1.1x10 '-oral
6x10 *-inhal.
ID
Cancer
Group
D
A

B1
B2

B2

D
B2

B2
B2

D
D
D
B2


B2

D
"   =   Calculated 0.3 mg/m3 x20 = 6 mg/day
ID  -   Insufficient Data
ND =   Not Derived (Carcinogen)
NA =   Not Applicable
                                                                        &U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: IWI - 54«-OZ»/40032

-------

-------
 This Project Summary was prepared by staff of the Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, USEPA,
   Cincinnati, OH 45268.
 Deb McKean is the EPA Project Officer, (see below).
 This Project Summary covers 15 separate reports, entitiled, "Updated Health Effectrs Assessment for..."
 Acetone (Order No. PB90-142373/AS; Cost $15.00)
 Benzene (Order No. PB90-142381/AS; Cost $17.00)
 Cadmium (Order No. PB90-142399/AS; Cost $17.00)
 Carbon Tetrachloride (Order No. PB90-142407/AS; Cost $17.00)
 Chlordane (Order No. PB90-142415/AS; Cost $15.00)
 Chlorobenzene (OrderNo. PB90-142514/AS; Cost $15.00)
 Chloroform (Order No. PB90-142423/AS; Cost $15.00)
 DDT (Order No. PB90-142431/AS; Cost $17.00)
 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (Order No. PB90-142456/AS; Cost $15.00)
 Methylene Chloride (Order No. PB90-142449/AS; Cost $17.00)
 Naphthalene (Order No. PB90-142464/AS; Cost $15.00)
 Phenol (Order No. PB90-142472/AS; Cost $15.00)
 Tetrachloroethylene (Order No. PB90-142480/AS; Cost $17.00)
 Trichloroethylene (Order No. PB90-142498/AS; Cost $17.00)
 Xylenes (Order No. PB90-142506/AS; Cost $17.00)
        (All costs are subject to change)

 The above reports will be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
 The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
        U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental Research
Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
 EPA PERMIT NO. G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA/600/S8-91/042

-------