v>EPA
                         United States
                         Environmental Protection
                         Agency
                         Research and Development
                                    Risk Reduction
                                    Engineering Laboratory
                                    Cincinnati, OH 45268
                                    EPA/600/S-92/033   Sept. 1992
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH   BRIEF
                          Waste Minimization Assessment for a
                    Manufacturer Producing Printed Circuit Boards

                                 Harry W. Edwards and Michael Kostrzewa"
                                           Phylissa S. Miller"
Abstract
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has funded
a pilot project to assist small- and medium-size manufacturers
who want to minimize their generation of waste but who lack
the expertise to do so. Waste Minimization Assessment Cen-
ters (WMACs) were established at selected universities and
procedures were adapted from the EPA Waste Minimization
Opportunity Assessment Manual (EPA/625/7-88/003, July 1988).
The WMAC team at Colorado State University performed an
assessment at a plant which manufactures single-sided, double-
sided, and multilayer printed circuit boards — approximately
259,000 sq ft/yr. In general, circuit art work is received and
digitized. The circuit design film template is laser generated
from the digitized artwork. In addition copper/epoxy laminates
and copper foil (the inner layer's material for multilayer boards)
are cut  into blank boards and layers with hydraulic shears.
Component holes are cut by drilling machines. Drilled boards
are mechanically scrubbed to prepare for plating. Circuit pat-
terns are created on the  boards and foil layers with a dry-film
photoresist process and the multilayer boards are built up. The
actual copper circuit pattern is generated by a series of photo-
lithographic and plating processes. Final processing includes
legend application, routing, rinsing, electrical testing, inspections,
packing, and shipping. The  team's report, detailing findings
and recommendations, indicated that the majority of waste was
generated in the plating  lines and that the greatest  savings
could be obtained by installing a spray rinse and electrowinning
system on the first rinse tank of the electrolytic copper plating
line  to  reduce  both  copper plating rinse water (88%) and
plating sludge (80%) due to drag-out in the first rinse tank.
' Colorado State University, Department of Mechanical Engineering
" University City Science Center, Philadelphia, PA
                         This Research Brief was developed by the principal investiga-
                         tors and EPA's Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cin-
                         cinnati, OH, to announce key findings of an ongoing research
                         project that is fully  documented in a separate report of the
                         same title available from the University City Science Center.


                         Introduction
                         The amount of waste generated by industrial plants has become
                         an increasingly costly problem for manufacturers and an addi-
                         tional stress on the  environment. One solution to the problem
                         of waste is to reduce or eliminate the waste at its source.

                         University City Science Center (Philadelphia, PA) has begun a
                         pilot project to assist small- and medium-size manufacturers
                         who want to minimize their formation of waste but who lack the
                         inhouse expertise to do so. Under agreement with EPA's Risk
                         Reduction  Engineering Laboratory, the Science Center has
                         established three WMACs. This assessment was done  by
                         engineering faculty and students at Colorado State University's
                         (Fort Collins)  WMAC. The  assessment teams have consider-
                         able direct experience with process operations in manufactur-
                         ing plants and also  have the knowledge and skills needed to
                         minimize waste generation.

                         The waste minimization assessments are done for small- and
                         medium-size  manufacturers at  no out-of-pocket cost to the
                         client. To qualify for the assessment, each client must fall
                         within Standard Industrial Classification Code 20-39, have gross
                         annual sales not exceeding $75 million, empby no more than
                         500 persons, and lack inhouse expertise in waste minimization.

                         The potential  benefits of the pilot project include minimization
                         of  the amount of waste generated  by manufacturers, and
                         reduced waste treatment and disposal costs for participating
                                                                               Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
 plants. In addition, the project provides valuable experience for
 graduate and undergraduate students who participate in the
 program, and a cleaner environment without more regulations
 and higher costs for manufacturers.


 Methodology of Assessments
 The waste minimization assessments require several site visits
 to each  client served. In general, the WMACs follow the pro-
 cedures  outlined  in the EPA Waste Minimization Opportunity
 Assessment Manual (EPA/625/7-88/003, July 1988). The WMAC
 staff locate the sources of waste in the plant and identifies the
 current  disposal  or  treatment methods and  their associated
 costs.  They  then  identify and  analyze a variety of ways to
 reduce or eliminate the waste. Specific measures to  achieve
 that goal are recommended and the essential supporting tech-
 nological and economic information is developed.  Finally,  a
 confidential  report that details the WMAC's findings and rec-
 ommendations (including cost savings, implementation costs,
 and payback times) is prepared for each client.


 Plant Background
 The plant produces single and multilayer printed circuit boards.
 The plant operates 4,100 hr/yr to produce approximately 259,000
 sq ft of printed circuit board.


 Manufacturing Process
 This plant manufactures  single-layer  and multilayer printed
 circuit  boards. Raw  materials  for  board production  include
 copper/epoxy laminates and copper foil. Process raw materials
 include both  dry-film  and positive-image  photoresist, copper
 etchant,  black oxide  reagents,  B-stage resin, copper plating
 reagents, tin plating reagents, photodeveloper, photofixer,
 stripping  and etching solutions, tin/lead solder, and gold-tab
 plating reagents.

The following steps are involved in making the boards:

  •  Circuit information is  received  from customers as  blue-
    prints, films, computer floppy diskettes, or some combina-
    tion  of these. Circuit  information  received  as artwork is
    digitized  and  stored in a computer. Working film, a tem-
    plate for the  circuit design, is  laser generated from the
    customer's circuit information.
  •  Laminates and foil are cut into blank boards and layers
    with  hydraulic shears. Component holes are then gener-
    ated  in  the blank boards with high-speed, numerically-
    controlled drilling  machines. Drill programs are generated
    digitally  and  provide drilling  instructions for the drilling
    machines. Drilled boards are mechanically  scrubbed to
    prepare for plating.
  •  Circuit patterns are created on the board and layers with
    dry-film photoresist. For the individual inner layers of the
    multilayer boards, the  circuit  pattern is  generated with
    positive-image photoresist. The electrical circuit  design is
    transferred to the individual layers by first laminating a UV-
    sensitive  dry-film photoresist to the layers. An image of the
    design is generated by  placing a template of the circuit
    over  the film, exposing the film to UV light, and developing
    the photoresist. Unexposed  photoresist is removed, but
    exposed  film is polymerized and protects the underlaying
    copper circuitry. Unwanted copper is  removed with  an
    ammonia  etchant. The  remaining protective film  is  re-
    moved,  and  exposed copper circuitry  is oxidized and
    cleaned.  Oxidation assures good  interlayer bonding  be-
    tween panels in the multilayer array.  Fiberglass-weave
    sheets impregnated with resin are placed between each
    layer, and the array is heated and bonded in a hydraulic
    press. Component holes are then  drilled in the multilayer
    panels. Further processing of multilayer boards is identical
    to that of single  and double-sided boards.
  • The circuit pattern is generated by a series of photolitho-
    graphic  and plating processes.  First,  the  surfaces  are
    copper plated in an electroless plating process. This process
    deposits copper on all exposed surfaces,  including  the
    surfaces of  drilled holes. Photoresist is then  laminated to
    the  board  surfaces. Additional  copper  is electrolytically
    plated on the surface circuit patterns. After cleaning,  the
    pattern  is plated with  tin to protect the copper circuitry
    during subsequent steps to remove  the resist film and
    unwanted copper. The tin layer is removed following resist
    stripping  and copper etching. A solder mask is silk-screened
    and thermally cured  to the board surfaces prior to dipping
    the  boards  in  molten  tin/lead solder.  The  solder layer
    provides a  surface  for mounting  electrical components.
    Additional processing involves conditioning of the soldered
    surfaces, cleaning,  rinsing, and  inspecting  the  finished
    circuit boards. Connector tabs can be gold plated in sub-
    sequent  processes if requested by the customer.
  • Final processing  includes silk-screen application of a leg-
    end, routing, rinsing, electrical testing, quality assurance
    inspections, packing, and shipping.

  An abbreviated process flow diagram is shown in Figure  1.


Existing Waste Management Practices
This plant already has implemented the following techniques to
manage and  minimize its wastes:

  •  Tin plating is used to  provide a protective mask for the
    circuit image during photoresist stripping and copper etch-
    ing.  Unalloyed tin plating replaces traditional tin/lead sol-
    der, thereby reducing lead contamination. Tin/lead solder
    is still used as a final circuit coating.
  •  Bright tin plating  has been  replaced by  matte tin plating.
    The  matte tin is less dense and provides a greater topog-
    raphy than the bright tin. Thus, the matte tin requires less
    tin stripper and generates less spent tin stripper.
  •  Dry film used as  plating resist eliminates chlorinated sol-
    vents frequently used  in  silkscreening   operations.
    Silkscreening is still used  to apply wet resist solder masks
    and circuit legends.
  •  Deburrers and scrubbers  using water replace more  tradi-
    tional solvent-based drying.
  •  The water supply to the electroless copper plating, electro-
    lytic copper plating, black oxide, and gold tab  plating lines
    has been divided so  that each line  has a separate supply
    valve. In  the past, the  water supply to all of these lines
    was  controlled  by one valve. By separating the water
    supply, less  water is wasted when  a given line  is not  in
    use.
  •  Counterflow  rinses and flow reducers are used in plating
    operations to reduce rinse water usage. Still drag-out tanks
    are  used following electrolytic copper and tin plating to
    reduce contamination of subsequent flowing rinses.
  •  An automated plating machine is used on the electroless
    copper plating line. Automation reduces excess rinse wa-
    ter contamination by providing consistent residence and
    drainage  times.
  •  Loss of gold in rinse  water has been reduced with an ion
    exchange resin on the gold plating rinse.

-------
                        Film Application
                        and Development
    Water to Sewer
    Studge to Shelter
              Spent Reagent
              Batch Treatment

              - Water to Sewer
              - Sludge to Shelter
                       Electrolytic Plating,
                       Etching, Stripping
                       Solder, Routing,
                       Plating, Packaging
   •  Scrap gold, solder, and aluminum are shipped offsite for
     recycling.


Waste Minimization Opportunities
The type of waste currently  generated by the plant, the source
of the waste, the quantity of the waste, and the annual man-
agement costs are given in  Table 1.

Table 2 shows the opportunities for waste minimization that the
WMAC team recommended for the plant. The type of waste,
the minimization opportunity, the  possible waste reduction and
associated savings, and the  implementation cost along with the
payback times are given in  the table. The quantities of waste
currently  generated by the plant and possible waste reduction
depend on the production level of the plant. All values should
be considered  in that context.

It should be noted that, in most cases, the economic savings of
the minimization opportunities result from the need for  less raw
material  and from reduced present and future costs associated
with waste treatment and disposal.  Other savings not  quantifi-
able  by  this study  include  a wide  variety of  possible  future
costs related to changing emissions  standards, liability,  and
employee health. It should also be noted that the savings given
for each opportunity  reflect  the  savings  achievable  when
implementing each  waste  minimization opportunity  indepen-
dently and  do  not  reflect duplication of savings  that  would
result when the opportunities are  implemented  in a package.

This research brief summarizes a part of the work done under
Cooperative  Agreement No.  CR-814903 by the  University City
Science Center under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.  The EPA  Project Officer was Emma  Lou
George.
 Figure 1.  Abbreviated process flow diagram.
 Table 1.  Summary of Current Waste Generation

 Waste Generated                Source of Waste
 Cuposit reagents
 Cuposit rinse water
 Oxide/desmear reagents
 Oxide/desmear rinse water
 Copper plating reagents
 Copper plating rinse water
 Spent copper etchant

 Spent tin stripper

 Gold-tab reagents
 Gold-tab rinse water
 Spent nickel plating solution
 Spent solvent (TCA)

 Press cooling water
 Developer rinse water
 Waste photo fixer
 Spent rack stripper
 Plating sludge
 Copper scrap (dropoffs)
 Solder dross
Electroless copper plating line
Electroless copper plating line
Black oxide/desmear line
Black oxide/desmear line
Electrolytic copper and electrolytic tin plating line
Electrolytic copper and electrolytic tin plating line
Enclosed closed-loop etching machine on the
  electrolytic copper and electrolytic tin plating
Two-step tin removal tanks on the electrolytic
  copper and electrolytic tin plating
Gold-tab plating line
Gold-tab plating line
Gold-tab plating line
Gold-tab plating line (to remc
  adhesive residue during wt
Multilayer circuit board press
Photoresist developer rinse
Photoresist and film developing
Rack stripping operation
All plating lines
Circuit board routing and,
Hot-air leveling
                                               Annual Quantity
                                                  Generated
                                   Annual Waste
                                 Management Cost
                22,050 gal
             1,117,200 gal
                38,963 gal
               705,600 gal
               108,800 gal
             3,823,470 gal
                22,330 gal

                 5,795 gal
$ 3,714
  9,354
  6,563
  5,908
 47,420
 37,361
 88,813

 81,024
1 Plant personnel report no incremental cost associated with present disposal to POTW.
*Plant personnel report no incremental cost associated with present disposal in municipal waste.



e masking tape
7i/humid weather)


7


ing operations

765 gal
3,034,080 gal
165 gal
110 gal
282,240 gal
1,1 28,960 gal
30 gal
1,348 gal
1 16,900 Ib
8,575 Ib
6,500 Ib
129
1 1,804
570
980
893
3,572
O1
22,326
24,257
O2
23,230
                                                                             . GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: I9M - S50-067/80172

-------
Table 2. Summary of Recommended Waste Minimization Opportunities
Annual Waste Reduction
Waste Generated
Spent rack stripper
Plating sludge 1
Copper plating rinse
water
Plating sludge 2
Minimization Opportunity
Use polyethylene plating racks
in the electrolytic copper plating
bath to reduce the need for
stripping solution.
Install a spray rinse and electro-
winning-system to replace the
first rinse in the electrolytic
copper plating line.
Quantity
101 8 gal
448 Ib
328, 300 gal
14,240 Ib
Percent
75.5
75.5
88
80
Net Implementation
Annual Savings Costs
$16,951 $28,300
14,453 4 17,433
Payback
Years
1.7
1.2
Plating sludge3
Oxide/desmear rinse
  water
Increase drain times over the         4,450 Ib
electrolytic copper plating tanks
to reduce drag-out.

Install contact switches on the     183,750 gal
rinses in the desmear/etchback
line to reduce water consumption.
25
69
             12,237
581
1 Plating sludge results from treatment of spent stripper.
2Plating sludge results from drag-out on first electrolytic copper plating line rinse tank.
3Plating sludge results from drag-out on electrolytic copper plating line.
4This figure includes copper recycling credit, increased electricity consumption, and cathode replacement cost.
               1,000
                               645
0.08
                                              1.1
  United States
  Environmental Protection Agency
  Center for Environmental Research Information
  Cincinnati, OH 45268

  Official Business
  Penalty for Private Use
  $300

  EPA/600/S-92/033
                                                                              BULK RATE
                                                                        POSTAGE & FEES PAID
                                                                                  EPA
                                                                            PERMIT No. G-35
                                                                                                                                     \

-------