v>EPA
                           United States
                           Environmental Protection
                           Agency
                                     Risk Reduction
                                     Engineering Laboratory
                                     Cincinnati, OH 45268
                           Research and Development
                                     EPA/600/S-92/034   Sept. 1992
ENVIRONMENTAL
RESEARCH   BRIEF
                           Waste Minimization Assessment for a
                    Manufacturer of Custom Molded Plastic Products

                              Richard J. Jendrucko* and Phylissa S. Miller**
 Abstract
 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has funded a pilot
 project to assist small- and medium-size manufacturers who want to
 minimize their generation of waste but who lack the expertise to do
 so. Waste Minimization Assessment Centers (WMACs) were es-
 tablished at selected universities and procedures were adapted from
 the EPA Waste Minimization Opportunity Assessment Manual'(EPA/
 625/7-88/003, July 1988). The WMAC team at the University of
 Tennessee performed an assessment at a plant manufacturing
 custom-molded structural foam plastic products — approximately
 840,000 parts per year. Resin pellets are blended with colorant
 pellets and regrind, then processed through a mold and press
 machine. Unfinished products are degated to remove seams, have
 attachments inserted,  and are drilled, if necessary. Next, parts are
 patched and sanded. Finally, the part undergoes finishing operations
 including nickel coating, spray fill application, and top coat application.
 The team's report, detailing findings and recommendations, indicated
 that the majority of waste was generated in the mold and press
 machines but that the greatest savings could be obtained by utilizing
 electrostatic spray equipment in the finishing department to reduce
 (by 28%) the amount of paint solids waste generated.

 This Research Brief was developed by the principal investigators
 and EPA's  Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH,
 to announce key findings of an ongoing research project that is fully
 documented in a separate report of the same title available from
 University City Science Center.


 Introduction
 The amount of waste generated by industrial plants has be-
 come an increasingly costly problem for manufacturers and an
' University of Tennessee, Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics
" University City Science Center, Philadelphia, PA
                         additional stress on the environment. One solution to the prob-
                         lem of waste is to reduce or eliminate the waste at its source.

                         University City Science Center (Philadelphia, PA) has begun a
                         pilot project to assist small- and  medium-size manufacturers
                         who want to minimize their formation of waste but who lack the
                         inhouse expertise to do so. Under agreement with EPA's Risk
                         Reduction Engineering Laboratory,  the  Science  Center has
                         established three WMACs. This assessment was done  by en-
                         gineering faculty and students at the University of Tennessee's
                         (Knoxville) WMAC. The assessment teams have considerable
                         direct  experience with process operations  in  manufacturing
                         plants  and also have  the knowledge and  skills needed  to
                         minimize waste generation.

                         The waste minimization assessments are done for small- and
                         medium-size  manufacturers  at no out-of-pocket cost  to the
                         client. To qualify for the assessment, each client must fall within
                         Standard Industrial Classification Code 20-39, have gross  annual
                         sales not exceeding $75 million,  employ no more than 500
                         persons, and  lack inhouse expertise in waste minimization.

                         The potential benefits of the pilot project include minimization of
                         the amount of waste generated by manufacturers, and reduced
                         waste treatment and disposal costs for participating plants.  In
                         addition, the project  provides valuable experience for graduate
                         and undergraduate  students who  participate in the program,
                         and a cleaner environment without more regulations and  higher-
                        costs for manufacturers.


                        Methodology of Assessments
                        The waste minimization assessments require several site visits
                        to each client served. In general, the WMACs follow the proce-
                        dures outlined in the EPA Waste Minimization Opportunity As-
                                                                               Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
sessment Manual (EPA/625/7-88/003, July 1988). The WMAC
staff locate the sources of waste in the plant and identifies the
current  disposal  or treatment  methods  and their  associated
costs. They then identify and analyze  a variety of ways to
reduce  or eliminate the waste. Specific  measures  to  achieve
that goal are recommended and the essential supporting tech-
nological  and economic information is  developed.  Finally, a
confidential  report that details the  WMAC's findings and rec-
ommendations (including  cost savings,  implementation costs,
and payback times) is  prepared for each client.


Plant  Background
The plant manufactures  custom-molded plastic products  in-
cluding  dashboards, door seals, and fan shrouds for automo-
biles, television cabinets, postage meter housings, and computer
disk storage  organizers.  The  plant operates  6,240  hr/yr to
produce approximately 840,000 parts.


Manufacturing Process
This plant manufactures its  various  finished   products  from
structural  foam. Primary raw materials consist  of seven types
of resin pellets and colorants. Other raw materials  necessary
for the production processes are various solvents, paints and
finishing materials.

The following  unit operations are involved in manufacturing the
products:


Structural Foam Production
   • Resin pellets are blended with  colorant pellets and  "regrind"
    from material recycling in a batch mixing process, and are then
    vacuum fed into hoppers on each of the ten  mold and press
    machines.
   • Pellets proceed through  an electrically heated zone and to a
    zone  where a blowing agent, hydrocerol or  nitrogen gas, is
    added. Next, molten plastic is injected into a mold. Nitrogen gas
    is sometimes used  during this process to pressurize the mold.
    Chilled water is continuously circulated through the press molds
    for cooling.
   • From  the mold and  press machines, the product may be sold to
    the customer unfinished or may be directed to one of four work
    areas: inserting, degating, and drilling  (considered as one op-
    eration), finishing department, secondary department, or defective
    product recycling.


Inserting,  Degating, or  Drilling
   • The majority of molded parts are manually "degated"to remove
    seams formed in the presses. Following degating  most parts
    have  brass or aluminum fastener attachment inserts applied
    which are ultrasonically bonded to the piece. Inserting may also
    include  an ultrasonically-induced bonding process (between
    molded pieces) in the production of shelving.
   • A smaller portion of formed molds is drilled as needed along
    with the  remaining product  from degating not transferred to
    inserting. All molds from  drilling  proceed to inserting and then
    are transferred to  either the secondary department or the
    finishing department.


Secondary  Department
   • Products from inserting, degating, and drilling abng with products
    directly from the mold  and presses enter a patching process
    where a filler is applied to improve surface smoothness.
  •  A very small product fraction may  proceed to binding where
    toluene is applied for the mating of two surfaces.
  •  Products from bonding and patching are manually power-finish-
    sanded  and either transferred to the finishing department or
    shipped directly to the customer.


Finishing Department
  •  Products brought to the finishing department begin at nickel
    coating, "spray-fill",  or top-coat. Items that are nickel-coated
    proceed to "spray-fill" and to top-coat.  Those beginning at
    spray-fill continue to top-coat.
  •  At nickel coating, a conductive paint and methyl ethyl ketone
    (MEK) thinner are mixed and then air-sprayed onto the product
    in spray booths. Next, the items are positioned on an overhead
    conveyor for  an 11-12  minute passage through an infrared
    oven followed by transfer to a "spray-fill" booth.
  •  At a "spray-fill"  booth, "spray-fill",  reducers, and catalyst are
    mixed and applied.  Products are passed through the same
    infrared  oven for drying followed by  finish-sanding.
  •  Products proceed to a top-coat paint booth where paint, solvent
    reducers, and a catalyst are mixed and applied by hand-held
    spray guns. Painted parts proceed through the infrared oven
    described  above. Next, some product pieces are textured with
    a catalyzed polyurethane  paint. These items are  dried in a
    propane gas-fired oven  and then boxed for shipment to the
    customer.
  •  A  mixture of  several solvents including  acetone,  MEK, and
    recovered solvent is used to spray  clean equipment and wipe
    down walls. Overspray in each paint booth collects in a water
    bath from  which paint  solids are  skimmed once per  shift.
    Additional  overspray coats the  paint  booth walls from which
    residue  must be scraped periodically.

An abbreviated process flow diagram  is shown in Figure 1.


Existing Waste Management  Practices
This plant already has implemented the following techniques to
manage and minimize its wastes:

  •  The plant  has purchased approximately 13 new paint guns to
    improve paint application efficiency  to result in some reduction
    of overspray occurring during the painting process.
  •  Approximately four  years  ago, water baths were installed in
    each booth to collect overspray and  reduce airborne emissions.
  •  Plant personnel  installed a distillation unit to recover waste
    solvent used for cleaning paint guns and paint booth walls.
  •  Inhouse waste surveys have  been  conducted sporadically for
    approximately 7-8 years in order to reduce the amount of waste
    produced.


Waste Minimization Opportunities
The type of  waste currently generated by the plant, the  source
of the waste,  the quantity of the waste, and the annual man-
agement costs are given in Table 1.

Table 2 shows the opportunities for waste minimization that the
WMAC team  recommended for the plant.  The type of waste,
the  minimization opportunity,  the possible waste reduction and
associated savings, and the implementation cost along with the
payback times are  given in the  table. The quantities of waste
currently generated by the  plant and  possible waste reduction
depend on the production level  o* the plant.  All values  should
be considered in that context.

-------
          Resin Mixing, Melting,
          Extruding, and Molding
               V
  V
   Inserting, Degating,
   and Drilling
Finishing
- Texture Coating
-  Nickel Coating
-  Spray-Fill
-  Top-Coat
                   Spent Rags,
                   Rejects,
                   Water/Oil
      Solvent Evaporation,
      Spent Solvent,
      Paint So]ids
Figure 1.  Abbreviated process flow diagram.

 It should be noted that, in most cases, the economic savings of the
 minimization opportunities result from the need for less raw material
 and from reduced present and future  costs associated  with waste
 treatment and disposal. Other savings  not quantifiable by this study
include a wide variety of possible future costs related to changing
emissions standards, liability, and employee health. It should also be
noted that the savings given for each opportunity reflect the savings
achievable when implementing each waste minimization opportunity
independently and do not reflect duplication of savings that  would
result when the opportunities are implemented  in a package.


Additional Recommendations
In addition to the opportunities recommended and analyzed by the
WMAC team, three additional measures were considered. These
measures were  not completely analyzed  because  of  insufficient
data, implementation difficulty, or a projected lengthy payback. Since
one or more of these approaches to waste reduction may, however,
increase in attractiveness with changing conditions in the plant, they
were brought to the plant's attention for future consideration.

  • Wash clean-up rags used during painting and on the mold and
    press machines inhouse.
  • Send molds to a vendor for application of Teflon coatings to
    eliminate the need for the use of the mold release agent. Teflon
    can operate continuously at temperatures up to 550 °F. Thus, it
    would be suitable for use in these molds  since their operating
    temperature is 300 to 400 °F.
  • Install a carbon adsorption solvent recovery  system for the
    paint booths to recover finishing solvents.

This research brief summarizes  a part  of  the  work done  under
Cooperative Agreement No. CR-814903 by the University City Sci-
ence  Center  under the sponsorship of the  U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency. The EPA Project Officer was Emma Lou George.
 Table 1.  Summary of Current Waste Generation

 Waste Generated                 Source of Waste

 Decanted water from oil separator   Hydraulic oil leaks and seepage from molds and presses. Water
                                 leakage during changing of press and mold cooling water manifolds.
                                                                    Annual Quantity    Annual Waste
                                                                      Generated    Management Cost
 Waste solvents (still bottoms)

 Paint solids

 Landfilled materials
 (e.g., dust,  sanding belts and
 disks, etc.)

 MEK evaporation1

 Toluene evaporation

 Acetone evaporation

 Xylene evaporation

 Catalyst evaporation

 Recovered solvent evaporation

 Rejected forms



 Spent hydraulic oil
                                                                      23,737 gal
                                                         nanifolds.

      Spray gun cleaning and periodic paint booth wall cleaning.                4,620 gal

      Painting booth water baths.                                          16,280 gal

      Grinding of recycled parts.  Sanding operations in the Secondary          79,412 Ib
      Department.


      Cleaning, painting, and mixing operations in the finishing department.       4,426 gal

      Cleaning, painting, and mixing operations in the finishing department.       1,100 gal

      Cleaning, painting, and mixing operations in the finishing department.       2,204 gal

      Cleaning, painting, and mixing operations in the finishing department.         771 gal

      Cleaning, painting, and mixing operations in the finishing department.       3,012 gal

      Cleaning, painting, and mixing operations in the finishing department.       1,714 gal

      Rejects from molding, degating and finishing department.               853,531 Ib
      Items returned by the customer for unacceptable finish,
      dimensioning, cracking, and paint quality.

      Hydraulic oil leaks and seepage from molds and presses.                 2,250 gal
                                                   $12,003


                                                    35,082

                                                    92,079

                                                     1,994



                                                    17,261

                                                     2,310

                                                     6,546

                                                     2,776

                                                     7,681

                                                       O2

                                                       O3



                                                   6,1884
1 Figures provided under Annual Waste Management Cost for all solvents reflect raw materials cost only as there is currently no additional waste
management cost associated with evaporation.
2Recovered solvent, according to plant personnel, has no raw material cost component.
3Plant personnel report no raw material costs or waste management costs associated with recycling rejected forms.
4Figure provided is the raw material cost only as plant personnel report no incremental cost associated with recycling spent oil through a reclaimer.
                                                                             •&V.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 19*4 - 550-4X7/801*8

-------
Table 2.  Summary of Recommended Waste Minimization Opportunities

                                                     Annual Waste Reduction
Waste Generated
                     Minimization Opportunity
Paint solids/Solvents
Paint solids/Solvents
Water
Paint solids
(water fraction)
Utilize electrostatic spray
equipment in the finishing
department.

Re-train paint personnel to
improve paint spraying
techniques.

Modify molding press cooling
water manifolds.

Install a vacuum dryer
system to reduce the amount
of water in paint solids
shipped offsite.
                                Quantity
              Percent
             Net
        Annual Savings
              Implementation
                  Costs
               Payback
                 Years
81,385lb



 4,831 Ib


98,513 Ib

44,929 Ib
                                                                      28
50

50
$203,923



  20,392


   3,011

  33,269
$48,200



  3,500


  2,320

 30,800
0.2



0.2


0.8

0.9
  United States
  Environmental Protection Agency
  Center for Environmental Research Information
  Cincinnati, OH 45268

  Official Business
  Penalty for Private Use
  $300
                                                                             BULK RATE
                                                                       POSTAGE & FEES PAID
                                                                                 EPA
                                                                          PERMIT No. G-35
 EPA/600/S-92/034

-------