United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
National Risk Management
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
                   Research and Development
                                                     EPA/600/S-96/001
                        May 1996
&EPA        Project Summary
                   Hydrogeologic Characterization
                   of Fractured  Rock  Formations:
                   A  Guide  for Groundwater
                   Remediators
                   Andrew J. B. Cohen, Kenzi Karasaki, Sally Benson, Gudmundur Bodvarsson,
                   Barry Freifeld, Pascual Benito, Paul Cook, John Clyde, Kenneth Grossenbacher,
                   John Peterson, Ray Solbau, BhaskarThapa, Don Vasco, and Peter Zawislanski
                   Abstract

                    A field site was developed  in the
                   foothills of the Sierra Nevada, California,
                   to develop and test a multidisciplinary
                   approach to the  characterization of
                   ground-water flow and transport in
                   fractured  rocks.  Nine boreholes were
                   drilled into the granitic bedrock, and a
                   wide  variety of  instruments  and
                   methodologies were tested.  Fracture
                   properties were measured on outcrops
                   and  in  boreholes using acoustic
                   televiewer,  digital borehole color
                   scanner, and by down-hole camera logs.
                   Conventional geophysical  logs were
                   collected. In addition, thermal-pulse and
                   impeller flowmeter logging,  fluid
                   replacement and conductivity logging,
                   packer-injection  profiling tests,  and
                   ordinary open-hole pumping tests were
                   conducted. Transmissive fractures were
                   identified by integrating  results from
                   hydrologic    and    geophysical
                   measurements, and the hydrogeologic
                   structure of the  formation   was
                   hypothesized. Cross-hole seismic
                   surveys yielded tomograms of inter-
                   borehole rock properties.  Visualization
                   software was used in combination  with
                   geophysical  logs  to interpolate inter-
                   borehole properties, and a detailed 3-D
                   model  of  the   subsurface   was
                   constructed.  Other referenced work at
                   the site includes cross-hole hydrologic
tomography, tracer tests,  fracture-
specific morphology  studies,  and
development of an  automated data
acquisition system used to collect data
and monitor and control test parameters
during borehole testing.  A novel aspect
of the project report is its guidebook
format. A description of each tool and
methodology, the  strengths  and
shortcoming of each, how they compare
with one another, and suggestions of
how best to analyze and integrate data
are presented.
  The Project Summary  was developed
by the National Risk Management
Research Laboratory's Subsurface
Protection and Remediation  Division,
Ada, OK, to announce key findings of the
research project that is fully documented
in a separate report (see Project Report
ordering information at the back).  The
reader is encouraged to visit the Internet
Web page for further information:
http://www.epa.gov/ada/kerrlab.html
1 Introduction

  Fundamental to every  ground-water
remediation effort is a description of the
subsurface distribution of contaminants and
fluid flow properties.  The  hydrogeologic
complexity of fractured formations makes
their characterization  very  difficult.  This

-------
difficulty  is the primary reason that the
majority  of  fractured   portions  of
contaminated formations have not yet been
investigated. Knowledgeofnewandexisting
site    characterization   tools   and
understanding of analysis  methods are
necessary first steps  toward improved
remediation of fractured formations.

1.1  Format of Project Report

  The  project  report describes  the  work
and   findings  of  a  hydrogeologic
characterization study of  a saturated,
fractured, granitic rock aquifer in the foothills
of the Sierra Nevada, California. A wide
variety of new and traditional  hydrologic
and geophysical characterization tools and
methodologies were tested. The numerous
field experiments  and analyses   have
provided many insights  that should greatly
benefit the remediation community.  The
project report was designed in a guidebook
format. First, an overview of the problems
associated  with remediating fractured
aquifers is presented.   Case histories are
referenced as examples.  Second, a brief
description of the methods and  results of
the  characterization effort  at the
experimental field site are presented. The
following chapters comprise the bulk of the
report.  Each chapter describes a particular
characterization phase,  and a general
strategy for hydrogeologic characterization
is presented.  Each tool and  method is
described  in detail.  Descriptions of the
tools, how they are used,  what are the
strengths  and shortcomings of each, how
they compare with one another, as well as
how best to analyze and integrate the data
collected, are discussed. Findings obtained
at other  remedial  sites where  fractured
materials are present are also referenced.
Determination of subsurface flow properties
is the emphasis of this  project rather than
contaminant  sampling   and  plume
delineation. However, issues regarding the
effect of incorrect characterization of flow
properties on  prediction  of contaminant
behavior are addressed. The findings and
recommendations  are not necessarily
limited  to fractured  crystalline  rock
formations;    many apply to  fractured
subsurface formations in general.

1.2  Experimental Field Site

  Studies  were conducted at the Raymond
Field Site, which is operated by  the E.  O.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and
the  U.S. Geological Survey.   Sponsorship
has been provided by the Office of Civilian
Radioactive Waste Management  of the
Department of Energy,  Atomic Energy of
Canada, Ltd., and bythe U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. The site was established
to develop  and test a multidisciplinary
approach to the characterization of ground-
water flow and transport in fractured rocks.
No ground-water  contamination was
present.  Research  began in  1992  and  is
ongoing.
  The site is situated in the western foothills
of the central Sierra  Nevada, California,
approximately 60  km (37 mi) south of
Yosemite  Valley and  about  5 km  (3 mi)
southeast of the town of Raymond (Figure
1).   Nine vertical  boreholes penetrate
fractured granitic bedrockto depths ranging
between 75  and 90 m. They are arranged
in a triangular pattern and are spaced no
more  than 61 meters apart (Figure 2).
     CALIFORNIA
                 ,
Figure 1. Location of Raymond Field Site

  The conceptual model  of  the site
subsurface is based on the integration of all
work  conducted at the site.   Borehole
geophysical  logs indicate that hundreds of
fractures intersect  each well.   However,
borehole flow  logs reveal  there are only
several distinct  hydraulically conductive
fractures in each. Many of the transmissive
fractures are subhorizontal and westwardly
dipping, and  are associated with pegmatite
dikes.  A few are subvertical or of different
orientation.  Most occur within or near one
of two zones  of relatively low  electrical
resistivity and increased borehole diameter,
both indications  of altered  rock.  These
zones dip gently  to  the  west and  are
separated by about 25 meters.  Fractures
with minimal  transmissivities occur in other
portions of the well. The conceptual model
consists  of  two  subhorizontal  and
hydraulically conductive fracture zones that
behave as confined units imbedded within a
relatively  impermeable  rock  matrix
(Figure 3).
1.3  Data Acquisition System

  An innovative, automated data acquisition
system was developed for the field site.
The new system was built around a 486 PC
which was used for controlling a sampling
table, opening and closing  borehole valves,
and  for logging pressure and chemical
concentration   data   from   all  the
measurement locations throughout the site.
Pressures are monitored in upto 29 different
packed-off  intervals  while flow rates and
water chemistry are monitored and analyzed
simultaneously.  The output from the
pressure transducers  and  chemical
concentration  measuring  devices are
available  in real-time on the computer.  In
addition,  controlled  parameters  such  as
flow  and  sampling rates can be  adjusted
during the test. A schematic of the new data
acquisition  system is shown  in Figure 4.
Pressure  transducers, tracer injection  or
tracer recovery instruments,  and pumps
were placed within isolated zones during
various hydrologic tests. Flowmeters and a
spectrofluorometer  were  located at  the
surface.  The packers have feed-throughs
so that both fluids and electric signals can
be passed  to the surface.  Data can  be
recorded at a rate of 1 Hz. Electrical signals
from the well heads  are transferred  in
underground conduits to terminal blocks in
the computer room. Analysis of fluorescent
tracers is accomplished using a flow-through
cell  in a fluorometer,  and  ionic tracer
concentration is  determined  using  ion
specific electrodes. A computer-controlled,
144 bottle sampling table was built so that
samples could be taken back to the lab  for
further analysis. In several months of field
use,  the  fully automated  data collection
system has proven  to be highly  reliable,
even for extended multi-week tests.

2  Methods and  Results

2.1  Surface  Fracture
Characterization

  Physical properties of fractures  exposed
on outcrops in the area within a several
hundred meter  radius from the well field
were  measured.  The report  describes
findings    from    several   hundred
measurements of fracture orientation, trace
length, spacing, weathering,  secondary
mineralization, and relative displacement.
Other measurements included  fracture
aperture, roughness,  and planarity, detailed
measurements of fracture  spacing  made at
nine  outcrops,  and  mapping  of  a large
fracture pavement.
  Regional  and site-specific fracture sets
were identified.   Regional sets consist of

-------
      SW-4
                                                              SE-4
  z
 [m]
  0 -,


 -10 -


 -20 -


 -30 -


 -40 -

 -50 -


 -60 -

 -70 -


 -80 -


 -90 -

-100 -
            I             I      i 	1   I   I   I      I           « I
                                      potentiomebric
                                       surface
 FRACTURED
  GRANITIC
  BEDROCK
(SATURATED)
                                  I  casing

                                    unscreened and uncased borehole
Figure 2. Plan and cross-sectional view of boreholes at the Raymond Field Site.
two orthogonal and steeply dipping tectonic
fracture sets, and unloading fractures that
are subparallel to the topographic surface.
The spatial distribution of fracture density,
aperture, and infilling characteristics of these
sets is, in general, highly heterogeneous on
the scale of the well field, and there is no
apparent  systematic structure.   The
characteristics of these sets were heavily
altered due to their exposure at the surface.
Other fracture sets exposed in the vicinity of
the well field are associated with aplite and
pegmatite  dikes.    Pegmatites  with
thicknesses  on the order of centimeters
were  often  observed  to  contain  a
discontinuous open fracture nearthe center
and chemical alteration associated with fluid
flow. The  average continuity of pegmatitic
                                     dikes is on the order of 10 m, with some
                                     extending 30 meters or more.
                                       Surface fracture characterization provided
                                     information useful to other phases of the
                                     site characterization.   Integration  of
                                     conventional  geophysical logs, hydrologic
                                     logs, and borehole fracture  detection
                                     methods  revealed  that  the   upper
                                     transmissive  zone  in  many wells  is
                                     associated with a  pegmatite dike.  The
                                     observation that pegmatite dikes at the
                                     surface are laterally continuous for tens of
                                     meters and are often fractured and exhibit
                                     signs of fluid flow provided support for
                                     inference  that these intervals are  portions
                                     of a continuous band of fracturing associated
                                     with  a  westwardly dipping pegmatite.
                                     Similarly, tectonic fractures were observed
to be planar and laterally extensive, which
justified the  use  of extrapolating  these
fractures linearly to other boreholes as a
means of hypothesis testing and  model
development.

2.2 Well Drilling

  Boreholes  were  drilled using an air-
percussion rotary  drill.  Boreholes  were
cased at shallow depths where the rock was
weathered and weak, and left uncased and
unscreened below  these zones.  Detailed
logs of the wells were made by a geologist
as drilling proceeded. The location of some
fractures was identified by observing drill
behavior  and cuttings.   Drilling  rates
increased in fracture zones.  Fluid-bearing
intervals were encountered,  and changes
in fluid flow with  depth were  measured.
These  observations, in combination with
changes  in  drilling rate  and cutting
characteristics,  indicated the possible
locations of transmissive fracture zones.
Total fluid flow observed at the final drilling
depth  was measured and  used as  an
indication of the relative discharge capacity
of each well. Comparison of the geologist's
logs with conventional geophysical logs and
fluid flow logging results show that several
of the dominant transmissive fracture zones
were identified during drilling.

2.3 Conventional Geophysical
Logging

  Three-arm caliper, fluid conductivity, 16-
and 64-inch  normal  resistivity, natural
gamma,   temperature,    single-point
resistance, spontaneous  potential, and
lateral  logs were  collected  in  each well.
Results and uses of these logs  are described
in Section 3.6.

2.4 Pumping Tests

  Constant rate  pumping  tests  were
performed for several well combinations.
Pressure transducers that can detect water
level changes on the order of 0.1 mm were
used to measure drawdown. Measurements
in the pumping well and observation wells
were recorded as often as every 10 seconds.
Wellsthat exhibited low yields  during drilling
could not be sustained since water levels
would fall beneath the upper fracture zone,
and well  bore storage  effects almost
completely dominated  the pumping well
pressure  response.   Observation well
pressure transients typically deviated from
an ideal confined aquifer response at early
pumping  times.  Some fit the ideal curve
almost exactly. Transmissivities calculated
from standard semi-log pressure transient
analysis were very similar from well to well,

-------
           SW-4
          ,   I
                         0-0
       •25-
  z[m]
       -50-
       -75
      •100-
                 SE-4
                   I
                          WEST

                                                      .. - - IP
                                                   --"*
                                                            "'
|0
             o
o
o
                lower
                              I iilpiiaiftr:! resistivity *: i"O'O Ol'in'• m

                              „ westward"],' dipping
Figures. Conceptual model of hydrogeologic structure at the Raymond Field Site.
and  did  not  reflect the large degree  of
heterogeneity found from borehole flow
logging tests.  The  report describes how
highly heterogeneous fractured formations
can  respond like homogeneous  porous
formations. Potential misinterpretations of
pressure transients, in general, are also
discussed.   Vertical flow profiling  in
observation wells shows that the boreholes
act as short-circuiting fluid pathways.

2.5  Detection and Measurement
of Subsurface Fractures

  Several technologies were explored as a
means to observe and measure subsurface
fractures.  Acoustic  televiewer (ATV) logs
provide images of the acoustic reflectivity of
the borehole wall.  Fracture signatures are
observable and enable measurement  of
fracture depth, orientation, dip, and apparent
aperture.  ATV logs were collected for all
nine  wells.  Color television camera logs
were obtained for all nine wells and were
used to  observe  fracture alteration  and
mineralization not observable  on the ATV
logs. Seven wells were probed with a new
digital borehole scanner(DBS). The scanner
digitally  records the reflected  intensity  of
the red,  blue, and green light wavelengths
from the borehole wall as a  white light
                             source  rotates  and  simultaneously
                             illuminates the borehole wall. High resolution
                             color images  of the borehole wall were
                             constructedfromthescannerdata. Fracture
                             orientation, surface roughness, aperture,
                             identification of fracture mineralization, and
                             other microscale properties are measurable.
                               A stereonet  of measured fractures from
                             the ATV logs  shows that  at least three
                             fracture sets are present within the  well
                             field.  Comparison of the ATV logs with the
                             color television and DBS logs revealed that
                             fractures can  be divided  into  more than
                             three  sets,   as  differences  occur  in
                             mineralization  that are  not  observable on
                             the ATV logs. In general, these comparisons
                             revealed that  in  the ATV logs:  1) closely
                             spaced fractures or zones of altered  rock
                             that were gouged out during drilling appear
                             as  a single, large fracture zone with no
                             distinguishable orientation, dip, or aperture;
                             2) mineral infilled fracturesthatwere slightly
                             gouged-out during  drilling appear as open
                             fractures;  3) sealed and  mineral  infilled
                             fractures not affected by drilling were not
                             detected; 4) partially sealed or very small
                             fractures were  not detected or were difficult
                             to identify;  and 5) the top  and  bottom  of
                             steeply dipping fractures were gouged out
                             and appearto havegreaterdip. Subsequent
                             borehole hydrologic tests showed that only
several of the  hundreds of observed
fractures in each borehole are transmissive.
Accordingly, spacing distribution of borehole
fractures did not correlate with the hydrologic
properties around each borehole.
  Quantitative  measurements  from the
television  camera logs were not possible,
but qualitative determinations of whether or
not fractures  were infilled were possible.
Rock discoloration around individual
fractures  could  be seen,  and  therefore
helped  locate  fractures  that might  be
hydrologically altered. The location of many
pegmatite  dikes was identified because their
large,  reflective  crystals were  easily
recognizable on the image.  This was very
valuable since it was later found that these
dikes were one of the significant conductive
fracture sets.   Orientation  and   dip of
pegmatites were determined by identifying
their trace on  ATV  logs.
  The DBS provided borehole  wall  images
of the greatest detail and quality.  Many
more fractures were observable compared
to the ATV logs.  The photographic quality
of the  logs  enabled  more precise
measurement  of fracture   aperture,
orientation, and  dip.  Mineral infilling in
fractures was clearly visible, and enabled
distinction between  open and  sealed
fractures.  Fluid alteration such  as oxidation
stains around some fractures  was  clearly
observable. Individual fractures within zones
that were  gouged out during drilling were
measurable. Several disturbed zones were
highly transmissive, and the DBS enabled
detection and measurement ofthe individual
fractures within these zones.

2.6  Borehole Flow Logging

  I mpellerflowmeter logging, thermal-pulse
flowmeter  logging,  fluid  replacement and
conductivity logging,  and straddle-packer
injection  profiling were performed to
determine the  location  of fluid-bearing
fractures  and  their  respective   trans-
missivities. Impellerflowmeter profiling was
performed in three wells. All ninewellswere
profiled  with  a thermal-pulse flowmeter.
Fluid conductivity logging was performed in
seven wells, and straddle-packer injection
tests were conducted  in all  nine wells.
Results  were  integrated with the borehole
scanning logs described  above, and with
the  conventional  geophysical  logs to
determine the specifictransmissive fractures
within an observed borehole flow interval.
  The impellerflowmeterwas used to profile
the vertical flow in a well while it was pumped.
The instrument is composed of an impeller-
type flowmeter  mounted  above a  hollow
shaft that  passes through the center of an
inflatable packer. The well was pumped at
a constant rate by a downhole submersible

-------
          486 PC
             I
Multiplexer &
Digital Multimeter
                         Automated Valves
                                                  Fluorometer
                       Pressure Trandueers
                       Flow meters
                       Ion Specific Electrodes
      Automated Sampling Table
Figure 4. Schematic of data acquisition and control system at the Raymond Field Site.
 pump situated near the upper portion of the
 well.   The  assembly was  successively
 inflated at different depths and vertical flow
 measurements were taken (Figure 5a). The
 drawdown transient throughout the  entire
 test duration was measured by a pressure
 transducer situated near the  upper portion
 of the well. Flow rate into the borehole from
 a particular interval was calculated from the
 difference in  vertical flow  measured over
 the  interval.   Apparent  formation
 transmissivity was  determined from the
 transient drawdown, which responded as a
 confined aquifer.   Transmissivities  of
 particular flow intervals were calculated  as
 the product of fractional inflow and formation
 transmissivity.  The minimum measurable
 flow rate of the impeller was 4 L/min. This
 relatively high stall velocity prohibited the
 profiling  of low-yielding wells.  Hence, the
 procedure was  only  conducted in  three
 relatively high yielding wells.   In addition,
 flow intervals near the lower portions of the
 wells could not be defined because vertical
 flow rates were  below the stall velocity of
 the instrument (Figure 5a).
  The  thermal-pulse flowmeter  (also
 referred  to as heat-pulse flowmeter) was
 used to profile  multiple wells during the
 pumping of a single, high yielding well (Figure
 5b). The instrument consists of a heating
 grid and temperature sensors emplaced
 within a central tube that passes through  an
 inflatable packer. Vertical flow velocity is
 determined by heating a small parcel  of
 water at the heating  grid and  observing the
 time of arrival of the parcel at temperature
 sensors located  above and below the grid.
 Response of one of the sensors indicates
                flow direction.  Differences in vertical flow
                with depth indicated fluid flow into or out of
                a borehole, but no quantitative estimate of
                the conductivity of such intervals could be
                determined.  The thermal-pulse flowmeter
                method  detected  more flowing intervals
                than the impeller method. This is consistent
                with the  fact that it has a lower minimum
                detection limit.  Vertical flows on the order
                of 0.05 L/min were measurable.  In theory,
                the thermal-pulse flowmeter could be used
                in the same manner that the  impeller was
                used  in  this  study,  thereby  allowing
                calculation of interval conductivities. For
                some wells,  measurements at the  same
                depth at different times were  different due
                to the evolving transient flow field.   This
                made the interpretation of some portions of
                some logs difficult. In one well, the thermal-
                pulse flowmeter did not detect  a flowing
                interval identified by the impeller method.
                This is most probably an artifact of the test
                methodology,  not  the  instrument.   A
                particular fracture may contribute flow
                differently when a well other than the one
                the fracture intersects is being pumped.  In
                addition,  the vertical flow transient  in an
                observation well associated with flow into a
                conductive fracture could  diminish  to
                unobservable levels by the time the well is
                profiled.
                  Fluid  replacement and conductivity
                logging was done in seven of the wells. The
                method consists of replacing the fluid in the
                well bore with deionized water, which has a
                much lower electrical conductivity than the
                formation water.   Replacement was
                achieved by simultaneously  pumping
                formation water near the upper portion of
the well and replacing with deionized water
at the bottom using downhole tubing.  After
replacement was  complete, the well was
pumped at a low and constant rate and a
time sequence of upward  and downward
logs of fluid  electric conductivity were
collected.  Figure 5c shows the downward
logs forwell SE-1.  The conductivity logs for
the seven wells exhibit noticeable peaks at
conductive fracture locations.  Therefore,
determination  of  the particular fracture
contributing to flow was straightforward,
requiring only a  brief  inspection of the
acoustic televiewer and/or  television logs.
Many  more conductive fractures were
identified bythis method than by the impeller
or thermal-pulse flowmeter.   Equally
significant is that the  measurements were
more  precise and enabled quick and
confident assessment of the locations and
relative magnitudes of the conductivity of
particular conductive fractures. The results
of the tests  are  amenable  to  analysis
whereby  the  transmissivity  of  particular
fractures is determined, although this was
not done in this study.  The fluid conductivity
logs have higher resolution in general, which
results in part because measurements were
made at many more  depths  compared to
the other methods.
  Straddle-packer injection tests were done
in all nine  wells.  Water was injected at a
constant  rate into a  6  meter packed-off
interval in a borehole.  Fluid pressure within
the interval was measured with a pressure
transducer.  Two transducers were also
mounted above and below the test interval
to monitor for possible flow leakage around
the packers and/or flow short-circuiting due
to interconnecting transmissive  fractures.
For each test interval injection was continued
until a pseudo-steady flow was  attained.
This was on the order of minutes to tens of
minutes.  This procedure was repeated at
different depths, and  the transmissivity of
each  interval was calculated using the
observed flow rates and injection pressures,
and assuming radial flow.  Short-circuiting
occurred in high conductivity  intervals and
transient injection  pressure and flow rates
persisted because of flow-line resistance
effects. Therefore, the conductivities of the
highest  conductivity  intervals  were
underestimated. The results are consistent
with the othertechniques but in some cases
indicate very  low transmissivity  intervals
while the others do not.

2.7 Integration of Geophysical
and Hydrologic Logs

  Conventional geophysical logs were used
in conjunction with flowmeter logs in order
to identify  the particular hydraulically con-
ductive fractures  and/or fractured zones

-------
              a)  Impeller
b)   Heat-Pulse
c)  Fluid  Conductivity
d)  Packer  Injection
                flow less than
                stall  velocity
                                             Q [L/min]
                                    -3   -2-101
                                        	1	1	
                                    [juS/cm]                    Q/AH [L/min/m]
                                  60       120       180   0       1        2       3
                                 H	1	1     I	1
Figure 5. Example results from the various flow logging techniques performed in well SE-1.  The impeller measurements were taken during constant rate
        pumping of approximately 15 L/min just above the most shallow measurement. Measurements below 31 m were not possible because of the high
        stall velocity of the instrument. Heat-pulse measurements were taken during pumping in well 0-0. Negative flow indicates downward flow.
        Upward and downward flow is converging and exiting borehole near 30 m.  Fluid conductivity profiles exhibit peaks where formation water is
        flowing into well through discrete fractures while the well is pumped above 10 m. Measurements are in micro siemans per centimeter. Straddle-
        packer injection tests show the relative magnitudes of transmissivity for 3 m intervals. Values are given as flow rate achieved per given injection
        pressure expressed as equivalent hydraulic head.
intersecting the boreholes. ATV, DBS, tele-
vision, 16-inch normal resistivity, caliper,
and  natural gamma logs were the  most
useful forthis purpose. After specific trans-
missive fractures were identified  in  each
well, fractures and fracture zones that inter-
sect multiple wells were identified by inter-
polating  fracture geophysical  properties
using 3-D visualization software.
  Figure 6 shows geophysical and flowmeter
measurements, and the identification of the
particular transmissive  fractures in well
SE-1,  for example.   Comparison of the
geophysical logs with one another indicated
that  caliper  logs show the  locations  of
increased borehole diameter.  Zones  of
intense fracturing such as in areas where
there  are many closely  spaced,  sub-
horizontal fractures were easily detected.
Some caliper anomalies are associated with
individual fractures. Peaks on the natural
gamma  logs  indicated  the presence  of
   pegmatitic dikes. Regions of resistivity less
   than 700 ohm-m are  associated with
   hydraulically conductive fractures.  Clays
   and  ferric  oxides  associated  with
   hydraulically altered fractures exhibit high
   electrical conductivities  compared  to  the
   parent  rock.
     In  general,  several  different  types of
   fractures are  transmissive: fractured
   pegmatitic   dikes,   closely  spaced
   subhorizontal fractures, subvertical tectonic
   fractures, and  to  a  minor degree various
   partially infilled aplite veins which are very
   weakly transmissive.   The fractured
   pegmatite dikes are often found  within or
   nearthe zones of subhorizontal and closely
   spaced fractures.   Two  subhorizontal
   fracture zones comprised of the westwardly
   dipping, subhorizontal altered fractures and
   pegmatites  were delineated based  on
   similarities in fracture geophysical properties
   in adjacent boreholes.   These two zones
                   define general hydrologic structures within
                   the well field (Figure 3).  Other important
                   features  include subvertical  tectonic
                   fractures which may connect these zones.
                   The report  describes  how  specific
                   transmissive  fractures  were identified  by
                   integration of different combinations  of
                   geophysical and flowmeter logs.

                   2.8 Computer Visualization

                     Visualization software enabled viewing of
                   the well field and how  particular fractures
                   are  positioned relative  to boreholes.
                   Borehole  lateral  logs were  used  in
                   conjunction  with surface  mapping  to
                   determine the x,y,z coordinates of the well
                   field. The true 3-D perspective of all wells
                   was constructed from  these coordinates.
                   This formed  the initial 3-D model upon
                   which to superimpose other features.  One
                   very useful  feature of the  model  was
                                                               6

-------
                        Natural    Resistivity
                        Gamma      (16 in)
                                                           SE-1
taliper      ATV
    Fluid       Identified
  Electrical    Conductive
Conductivity   Fractures
u


10 -
20 -



30 -


40 -


50 -

60 -
70 -

I • • i | I ' ' | I ' i ' 1 'I1 1 " 1 ' ' ' I IT!
0 -3 ISO 0 3000 16 18 20 HEP*™ ° 60 120 180 **»•»
,•["•• [QhttrriKtleftS] (ctntjitrtjleisl [azimuth] [(.iS/cm] I&lftf\t,i1h\ _
-
- f f
: t $
- \ \
: f. f
f ™' <-_
- •«* ^f™*
: \ r
: f [
: 1
: F*
^

t' ' ' '
'13
i '

Tf
~S'
™
•Ir-"1*-
1*
!••••£. 	
: i 7 ^
JT r- \Tf
If
: |
i
a ii
= ! r |
: 1 ^
f>w
t™_
1
~~ J^ J"
: ^ B




_
'
L.

-
-
—
-
_
— j
';, • .: ... - , , - H _:
•'
• *












i'-



'

i, , -


_-

—

-
• • ^,.
_
-
-
-
—
-,
\
        0.
        »
        D
Figure 6. Conventional geophysical logs and borehole fluid replacement and conductivity log of well SE-1. Fractures identified astransmissive shown at
       right.

-------
deducing subsurface fracture connectivity
and structure. For example, a transmissive
fracture identified by integrating borehole
flowmeter and  geophysical  data was
measured using the acoustic  televiewer
log, and a plane representing the azimuth
and dip of that fracture at its proper location
in a well could be displayed. This plane was
represented as a disk, and was used to see
where that  fracture would theoretically
intersect  other wells.   The  logs of other
wells were inspected to see if such a feature
was present at and around the extrapolated
location, and in this way quickly determined
which  features  extended between wells.
Extrapolation also considered  non-planar
fractures  and fracture measurement error.
A complex  3-D model of the site was
developed via this hypothesis testing  and
data synthesis approach.

2.9  Cross-Hole Seismic
Imaging

  Cross-borehole seismic surveys were
performed to deduce the location of fractures
and fracture zones  between wells.  The
method consists of  equipping a borehole
with a piezoelectric source transducer, and
an adjacent borehole with a string of
hydrophones.  The  transducer creates a
pressure  pulse which is measured  by the
hydrophones. Afterthetransducerispulsed
at a particular depth and measurements
are made, it is lowered and  pulsed again.
This procedure is repeated along the depth
of the  borehole.  The  seismic data from
each   receiver  during  each   depth
transmission is analyzed to determine the
travel time and amplitude of each received
seismic pulse.  A numerical  matrix that
incorporates the positions of each ray path
and  its  respective  travel  time  and/or
amplitude is  inverted and the velocity and/
or seismic attenuation of different pixel
elements  of a  2-D  grid representing the
plane  between  boreholes is determined.
Figure 7  shows the  concatenated seismic
velocitytomograms ofwell pairs SW3-SW2,
SW2-00,00-SE2, and SE2-SE3.  The results
support the conclusions regarding  the
general dual-layer, westwardly dipping
fracture zones.

2.10  Interwell Tracer Tests

  Radially convergent and two-well partial
recirculation  tracer  tests  using  both
conservative and reactive tracers were
conducted. The objectives of this test were:
(1) to  obtain  an estimate of transport
parameters; (2) to compare performance of
several different tracers; and (3) to compare
test methodologies and identify advantages
and shortcomings  of these  methods  as
tools to describe fracture flow properties.
  The upper fracture zone in each well was
isolated with pneumatic packers during both
tracer tests.  A minimum of two packers
were used  in each well with a total of 22
packers  in  9 wells.  Twenty-nine (29)
transducers were located within and around
packed-off zones throughout the  well field.
For the radially convergent test, well 0-0
was first pumped at a constant rate for a few
days prior to the tracer injection to establish
a quasi-steady  flow field.  A three tracer
mixture of  deuterium, fluoresceine, and
microspheres was subsequently injected at
             the upper fracture zone in well SW-3.  A
             mixture of bromide and fluoride was injected
             in the same zone two and a half hours later.
             The pumping continued forabout one week,
             during which time the pressure in  all 29
             zones and the flow rate atthe discharge line
             were continuously monitored and recorded.
             Also monitored in  real-time  were the
             fluoresceine and bromide  concentration in
             the  discharge  line  using  an in-line
             fluorometer and ion  specific electrode as
             described in section 1.3. Sample water was
             taken from the discharge line every ten
             minutes using the automated sampling table
            SW-3
          0-0
SE-3
           -3C 00
          -0.3
-10,00               1000
        DISTANCE [mj
                           VELOCITY DEVIATiON [km/s]
   3000
                                         0.3
Figure 7. Concatenated seismic velocity tomograms from adjacent well pairs. Image represents
        cross-section between well SW-3 and SE-3. Negative velocity deviation represents seismic
        velocity less than mean value. An upper and lower zone is apparent.

-------
   C/Co
  0.001


0.0008


0.0006


0.0004


0.0002
                         n

                         •
I
flouresceine

bromide

deuterium
                              20            40            60

                                 time [hrs from injection]
                                                              80
Figure 8. Normalized breakthrough curves of three conservative tracers during radially convergent
        test.
for later analysis in the laboratory.
  Figure 8 shows the breakthrough curves
of fluoresceine,  bromide,  and deuterium
normalized to the injection concentration.
Microspheres  were not detected  in the
pumped water.   It is possible  that the
microspheres became negatively  charged,
coalesced and, hence,  became stuck within
the fracture zone.   The  background
concentration of fluoride was too high for
the fluoride concentration  result  to be
meaningful.
  The first tracer arrival occurred at about
10  hours after injection.  The  tracer
breakthrough curves did not lie on  top  of
each other, even through the three tracers
are presumably  conservative (Figure 8).
The  evidence  suggests  that the  most
significant factor  responsible  for  this
behavior was that effective injection tracer
concentrations were different than predicted
because of borehole  mixing and storage
effects.  After the mixture of tracers  was
injected, the tracers may have separated
within the injection zone, which was roughly
ten times the volume of the injected fluid.
Due to its higher density, bromide may have
caused the tracer mixture plume to sink to
the bottom of the injection zone. The mass
of fluoresceine that arrived at the  pumping
well was calculated to be about 15% of the
total mass injected.   Almost all  of the
remaining mass was recovered by pumping
                                outfromthe injection well. Othercontributing
                                factors may include differences in the degree
                                of reaction (or non-reaction) between the
                                tracers.   Fluoresceine has been  reported
                                elsewhere to react  (fluoresce more) with
                                certain minerals intherockgiving increases
                                in apparent mass.
                                  A  partial-recirculation injection and
                                recovery tracer test was conducted  using
                                both reactive and conservative tracers. The
                                extraction and injection wells were the same
                                as in the previous test. The extraction and
                                reinjection rates  were 7.6 and 0.7  L/min,
                                respectively.   Bromide and fluoresceine
                                were used as conservative tracers and
                                lithium was used as a  sorbing tracer.   A
                                specially designed low volume  tracer
                                injection system was used to minimize the
                                well  bore effects observed in the  previous
                                test (Figure 9). The test was halted after 22
                                days, when the fluoresceine concentration
                                dropped to approximately one tenth of the
                                peak arrival concentration.
                                  There was a  significant difference
                                between the recovery of bromide and lithium
                                during the 22 days in which the  test was
                                conducted.  The percentage of  bromide
                                recovered was 80% of the injected mass,
                                and  less  than  30% of the lithium was
                                recovered.  In addition,  the breakthrough
                                curve for bromide was much steeper with a
                                peak arrival two  days before the  peak  for
                                lithium.   A simple  convective-dispersive
transport equation was used to determine
transport parameters from  field data.   A
linear relationship was assumed to exist
between fluid concentration and adsorbed
phase,  with  instantaneous chemical
equilibrium.  Transport is modeled along a
1-D stream tube between the injection and
withdrawal well.  This is  a reasonable
approach for this test since the ratio of fluid
injection to discharge is small. A dispersion
length of 32 meters was calculated from the
best-fit model.  As described subsequently,
the relevance of this  parameter is very
questionable.

3  Conclusions and
Recommendations

3.1  Surface Fracture
Characterization

  Observation and measurement of surface
geologic features is a standard and usually
initial investigative phase in any subsurface
characterization  effort.  A non-intrusive,
relatively low cost surface study combined
with previously documented geologic studies
can provide a  means to determine the
dominant types and orientations of fracture
sets present,  as well  as their physical
properties, spatial distribution, and probable
modes of genesis.  The relative ease and
low   cost   of   performing  surface
characterization   and  the  pertinent
information that it reveals makes it a practical
necessity,  but it  is not a  substitute  for
borehole studies. For example, most of the
fractures observable at the surface may not
be  hydrologically significant. Dominant
conductive  fractures in the subsurface are
not typically observable on the surface, or
only limited fractures may be observable at
the surface, simply  because few bedrock
outcrops are present.

3.2  Well Drilling

  Air drilling is the most appropriate method
for the installation of wells  in crystalline
bedrock in terms  of  its relative  cost,
penetration rate,  and  potential to yield
relevant  hydrogeologic  information.
Observation of drill  cuttings, drilling rate,
and flow out of the borehole during drilling
may be used to  infer lithology  and the
location  of transmissive fractures,  for
example. The rate of penetration offers an
obvious cost advantage over other methods,
but a greater savings is probably due to the
increased  information gained concerning
fluid-bearing zones.   Careful observation
during drilling  and a descriptive log can
provide valuable hydrogeologic information.
Of great significance is the fact that the
depth of transmissive  fractures may be

-------
                          Injection Tank
                         Discharge to Sarnpkr and
                         Fluyi firi'p tHi

I
I
                                      Packer

Figure 9. Equipment layout for two well tracer tests with partial recirculation. Tracer is injected into
        small annulus between borehole wall and injection casing between packers. Tracer exits
        through several feed-through valves evenly distributed over injection interval. Not to scale.
observable, because water will be brought
to the surface with the cuttings when such
fractures are encountered.   Flow can be
measured with a bucket at the surface, and
changes in flow with depth  may  indicate
that the  drill  bit encountered another
transmissive fracture or fracture zone.  In
addition, the flow measured at the total
depth may be used as a relative measure of
well yield. This information can be used to
assess  which  wells are  relatively high
yielding and,  therefore, are the best
candidates for pumping tests or borehole
flow profiling tests, for example.

3.3 Pumping  Tests

  Drawdown transients in different types of
fractured formations can behave in a manner
describable by the Theis or Cooper-Jacob
solutions,  but this  behavior  does  not
necessarily  indicate the  aquifer  can be
considered an equivalent porous medium.
Irrelevant parameter values can be derived
from analysis of drawdown transients, and
analysis of  late-time drawdown may be
essentially unrelated to the  region of the
aquiferthat is of interest. Well bore storage
                can  mask  the  effects  of  important
                heterogeneities, and semilog analysis  of
                drawdown in the  pump well  will  lead  to
                underestimates of transmissivity.  Local
                transmissivity heterogeneities can produce
                apparent anisotropic behavior in  the
                drawdown responses in observation wells.
                The  installation  of wells  can  connect
                previously unconnected fractures and create
                short-circuit  pathways.  Pumping of wells
                can further initiate transport of contaminants
                to  previously uncontaminated  areas.   In
                orderto maximize the information necessary
                for characterization and minimize cost and
                the potentially negative effects of pumping,
                pumping tests should not be conducted as
                tests in and of themselves.  Other hydrologic
                tests which are necessary in characterizing
                a fractured  formation yield more valuable
                information, and can simultaneously provide
                pressure  transients  amenable to standard
                pumping test analysis.   For  example,
                impeller-flow meter profiling allows one  to
                determine which fractures are conductive,
                and pressure transducers can be installed
                in wells during the test to measure pressure
                transients.  A drilling method that enables
                observation  of fluid  emanating from the
borehole can provide information regarding
which well(s) are best suited for pumping.
Pumping of wells during  any type  of test
should be minimized in duration, and efforts
should  be made to  analyze the  entire
pressure transient rather than resort only to
late-time data analysis.

3.4 Detection and Measurement
of Subsurface Fractures

  The  identification  and  measurement of
fractures  intersecting boreholes  is an
absolute necessity.   Besides its  use in
determining the general fracture trends or
sets, a database of fracture locations and
orientations in boreholes enables  one to
determine  fracture-specific geophysical
properties through  comparison with
standard geophysical  and flow logs.  The
combination of a flowmeter  log and an
acoustic televiewer log  may enable  the
determination  of particular hydraulically
conductive fractures.  The measured
orientation and dip may be  used to associate
these fractures with fracture sets, and project
to intersections with other borehole wells.
  Although the digital borehole scanner
provides the highest resolution  data, it is
relatively expensive.  However,  given  the
capabilities of the tool and imminent reduc-
tions in its cost, it will be the best tool  for use
in the  near future.  At present, ATV and
television logs used together provide very
useful fracture  data, especially  when
coupled with  standard geophysical logs.
Fractures can be easily mapped from the
ATV logs, and television logs can be used to
check if particular fractures are altered and/
or infilled.   The ATV was most useful for
identifying  the location of  fractures and
determining their orientation.   Measure-
ments of individual fracture properties, such
as aperture or roughness are not reliable.
The determination of orientation and dip of
individual fractures was very useful for later
use, when the  data was integrated  with
visualization software  and measured frac-
tures were  extrapolated to see where they
might intersect other  boreholes.  Most of
the information  gained from coring is  ob-
tainable through the combined data from
the ATV, television, and standard geophysi-
cal logs,  which are more economical and
timely.
  The  large data set resulting from  the
fracture measurements makes a statistical
analysis of spatial properties very tempting.
However, because of the  effects of  drilling
on the appearance of individual fractures,
and on the fact relatively  few of the many
fractures detected conduct fluid, statistical
descriptions of fracture aperture and spacing
(based on ATV data alone) should  not be
                                                              10

-------
used to estimate general hydrologic
properties.

3.5 Borehole Flow Logging

  Flow logging is a critical necessity in the
characterization study. It provides a means
to identify and quantify the transmissivities
of onlythe relatively few fractures orfracture
zones which  are in  fact conductive.  This
information  provides knowledge  of the
general structure of the aquifer, from which
all  future remedial planning  emanates.
Results from flow logging are best when
integrated with other geophysical logs.
  A necessity  of  all  flowmeters is that
pumping or injection  of  the well-bore is
required.  Therefore, a flow field  may be
established in the contaminated field, and
contaminants can  migrate to previously
uncontaminated areas. In orderto minimize
these  effects,  profiling  should first be
conducted in wells under natural conditions.
In theory, either the impeller or thermal-
pulse flowmeter could be used at this stage,
although the lower sensitivity of the latter is
probably the  better choice since flows are
likely to be very  low. Vertical borehole flow
will  probably be greatest soon after drilling
when fractures are being connected by the
installation of the well and the system is in
a highly  transient state.  After this initial
profiling,  the  method of  profiling  multiple
wells during the pumping of a single well
should be implemented. The highestyielding
well should be used as the pumping  well,
and driller's logs can providethis information.
Profiling in the pump well with the impeller
flowmeter  allows  determination of
transmissivities  of intervals adjacent to the
well, and by installing pressure transducers
in neighboring wells, a multi-well pumping
test is effectively conducted. This eliminates
the  need to perform a separate  pumping
test. Alternatively, one well can be used for
pumping and other wells profiled with a
heat-pulse flowmeter, for example.   The
information gained is somewhat different,
but  perhaps  more informative since one
can determine which fractures  are
transmissive  in  other wells, although not
quantitatively.   If the impeller or thermal-
pulse is  used,  it is recommended that a
downhole inflatable packer be used around
the  flow casing  to increase the sensitivity
and avoid borehole variation and turbulence
effects  and  to  reduce  the number of
calibrations needed.
  The use of packer injection tests  is not
recommended under most situations.  The
method is expensive and time consuming
and creates the greatest non-equilibrium
condition in the  aquifer. A method like the
fluid conductivity logging yields  precise
locations of transmissive fractures and can
be   analyzed   to   determine   the
transmissivities of these fractures.   The
packer-injection tests are probably  not
appropriate as a means to detect flowing
fractures but perhaps as a later investigative
phase once flowing fractures are found and
some quantitative assessment is sought.

3.6 Integration of Geophysical
and Hydrologic Logs

  Conventional geophysical logs were used
in conjunction with flowmeter logs in order
to  identify the  particular hydraulically
conductive fractures and/or fractured zones
intersecting the boreholes.  It was  found
that  by integrating  the flowmeter results
with the acoustic televiewer, television,  16-
inch normal resistivity, caliper, and gamma
logs, the particular conductive fracture or
fractured zone could be determined.  After
the conductive fractures were identified,
interpolation of properties  between  wells
was made based on similarities in various
fracture geophysical properties, and  the
general hydrologic structure of the aquifer
was deduced.   The integration of various
geophysical logs is an essential component
in  any characterization effort.  All  of  the
conventional geophysical logs collected may
be potentially  significant for use at other
sites. Reference is made in the full reportto
other works where different tools have been
used.

3.7 Computer Visualization

  Visualization software is nowan affordable
reality, and  allows  one to  deduce
complexities not possible from traditional 2-
D plots of  borehole data.  One very useful
feature of some visualization  software
routines is their ability to represent spatially
distributed data in a true three-dimensional
perspective,  and which  allow real-time
manipulation  of the viewing perspective.
Hypothesis testing via interpolation of
fracture properties  between  wells  is
extremely  beneficial. Visualization should
be  a commonplace tool  for  subsurface
characterization.

3.8 Interwell Tracer  Tests

  In general,  tracer tests  were the most
difficult field test to construct and operate,
even with the highly sophisticated and
expensive equipment used  at the Raymond
Field Site.  Well bore  storage  and mixing
effects in the injection zone severely altered
the intendedtestconfiguration and rendered
the tracer  breakthrough curves amenable
to arrival time analysis only. Even with  the
implementation  of  the  special  injection
system  that minimized borehole effects,
the usefulness  of the test  results  is very
questionable. The theoretical mixing lengths
that yielded the best model fit to the data
were larger than the well spacing between
the injection  and  withdrawal  wells.  This
result generally points out the shortcomings
of using the convection-dispersion equation
to model transport in highly heterogeneous
fracture rock. Based on the field experience
at this  site, tracer tests for characterizing
fracture formations as part of a remediation
program are problematic. Highly controlled
and sophisticated and expensive equipment
is needed,  and even  in  the best  of
circumstances  there  will  most likely  be
considerable ambiguity associated with the
derived parameters.
Notice:

  The information in this project summary
and in the original report is the result of a
research project funded jointly by the U.S.
Environmental Protection  Agency and the
U.S. Department  of  Energy.  Neither the
original  report  nor this project summary
should  be interpreted  as official  EPA
guidance for site characterization at  sites
located  in fractured rock formations.
                                                              11

-------
Andrew J. B. Cohen, Kenzi Karasaki, Sally Benson, Gudmundur Bodvarsson, Barry Freifeld, Pascual Benito, Paul Cook, John Clyde, Kenneth
  Grossenbacher, John Peterson, Ray Solbau, Bhaskar Thapa, Don Vasco, and Peter Zawislanski are with the Earth Sciences Division, Ernest
  Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

Stephen R. Kraemerwasthe EPA project officer (see below).

The complete report is entitled "Hydrogeologic Characterization of Fractured Rock Formations: A Guide for Groundwater Remediators" and is
referenced as LBL-38142/UC-800 (144 pages, color figures). A limited number of copies of the full report are available from Subsurface Remediation
Information Center, P.O. Box 1198, Ada, OK 74821. A digital copy is available on the home page  http://www.epa.gov/ada/kerrlab.html

The full report is available to DOE and DOE Contractors from the:
         Office of Scientific  and Technical Information
         P.O. Box 62
         Oak Ridge, TN 37831
         (615)576-8401

The full report is available from the:
         National Technical Information Service
         U. S. Dept. of Commerce
         5285 Port Royal Rd.
         Springfield, VA 22161

The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         National Risk Management Research Laboratory
         Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division
         P.O. Box1198
         Ada,OK74821-1198

-------