United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                    Research and Development
EPA/600/SR-92/017   April 1992
& EPA       Project  Summary
                    The  Performance  of  Chlorine-
                    Free Binary Zeotropic
                    Refrigerant Mixtures  in a Heat
                    Pump
                    Jiirgen Pannock and David A. Didion
                      This study uses a simulation model
                    and an experimental heat pump appa-
                    ratus with  counterflow heat exchang-
                    ers to show that two hydrof luorocarbon
                    (HFC) refrigerant mixtures, HFC-32/-
                    152a  and  HFC-32/-134a,  may  be
                    considered replacements for hy-
                    drochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC)-22 if the
                    appropriate mixture  compositions are
                    chosen. Data  indicate  that multiple
                    tradeoffs exist in mixture performance
                    for different compressor speeds and
                    mixture compositions.
                      If the results for  the HFC-32/-152a
                    mixture are compared at the same com-
                    pressor speed and capacity at which
                    the HCFC-22 results were obtained, the
                    improvements over HCFC-22 range
                    from 14% for the high-temperature cool-
                    ing mode to 2% for the low-tempera-
                    ture heating mode. The global warming
                    potential of the tested mixture is about
                    25% of the value of HCFC-22. However,
                    this zeotropic mixture is flammable in
                    the whole composition range.
                      The test results for the HFC-32/-134a
                    mixture, for mixtures containing more
                    than 35 mass percent of HFC-32, show
                    similar performance to the HFC-32M52a
                    mixture. Since HFC-134a is not flam-
                    mable, the HFC-32/-134a mixture exists
                    in  a certain range as a nonflammable
                    mixture. The test results for both mix-
                    tures show no problems with respect
                    to  extreme pressures or temperatures
                    in the tested composition range.
                       This Project Summary was devel-
                    oped by EPA's Air and Energy Engi-
                    neering Research Laboratory, Research
                    Triangle Park, NC, to announce key find-
                    ings of the research project that is fully
documented In a separate report of the
same title (see Project Report ordering
information at back).

Introduction
   The growing concern about the envi-
ronmental compatibility of currently used
refrigerants requires development and use
of new refrigerants and refrigerating meth-
ods. The incompatibility of chlorofluorocar-
bon (CFC) and  hydrochlorofluorocarbon
(HCFC) refrigerants with the Earth's ozone
layer and their influence on the green-
house effeict make it desirable to investi-
gate  ozone-safe refrigerants with low
greenhouse warming  potentials (GWPs)
that operate efficiently in refrigeration sys-
tems. This study investigated such ozone-
safe refrigerants as zeotropic mixtures for
heat pump' applications.
   The refrigerants considered in this study
are chemical derivatives of methane and
ethane. With the requirement that the ozone
depletion potential (OOP) of the  consid-
ered substances has to be zero, it follows
that they cannot contain any chlorine or
bromine (chlorine and bromine are consid-
ered  the  main catalytic substances de-
stroying the ozone layer). With this in mind,
the following substances were selected to
find a suitable working fluid for heat pump
applications: hydrofluorocarbon (HFC)-23,
-32, -125, -134a, -143a, and -152a.
   In order to evaluate their performance,
the refrigerants were compared to HGFC-
22 which is the commonly used refrigerant
in heat pumps in the United States.
   In the theoretical part of the report, a
suitable refrigerant mixture for the possible
replacement of HCFC-22 was determined
by applying a simulation program for the
                                                                     Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
different substances  and their  mixtures
under certain operating conditions.  The
results of this computer study were com-
pared and  analyzed  with respect to the
performance data.
   The experimental part of this  research
project consisted of tests with the theoreti-
cally best performing  refrigerant mixtures,
tha binary zeotropic mixtures HFC-32/-134a
and HFC-32/-152a. These tests were con-
ducted in a Mini-Breadboard Heat Pump
(MBHP).

Theoretical Study
   The results of the computer study show
that there are two binary mixtures of MFCs
that indicate a better performance than the
currently used  HCFC-22:  HFC-32/-152a
arid HFC-32/-134a. Although the pure com-
ponents of these mixtures show either lower
coefficients of performance  (COPs) and
higher volumetric capacities or higher COPs
and lower capacities, wide ranges of mix-
ture compositions perform better in COP
and show a higher volumetric capacity.
   The HFC-32/-152a mixture is flammable
since both pure substances are flammable.
Both  of these two refrigerants appear to
have tow toxicities. The mixture also has
the lowest  GWP of  all considered  mix-
tures. Operating temperatures and pres-
sures are within acceptable limits.
   The calculations for HFC-32/-134a show
a smaller performance improvement than
for HCFC-32/-152a but still  a significant
Increase compared to HCFC-22. Both of
these refrigerants are in the class of low
toxfcity, and only HFC-32 is flammable. If
flammabilily tests  show that a  nonflam-
mable refrigerant mixture exists within the
composition range of performance improve-
ment, this  mixture would  clearly be the
substance of choice with respect to safety
considerations. The GWP of HFC-32/-134a
is higher than that of HFC-32/-152a. How-
ever, it still is significantly lower than that of
HCFC-22. Again, the operating tempera-
tures and pressures do not appear to pose
any problems.
   Given the results of the computer study,
tests were conducted with these two refrig-
erant  mixtures within  certain  composition
ranges. The ranges of the tested mixtures
were determined largely by the desire to
find a mixture that achieves  at least the
same volumetric capacity and the same
COP  as HCFC-22.  This should be the
case for all operating conditions. At the
same time, excessive amounts of HFC-32
should not be used in order to provide for
acceptable discharge pressures even un-
der extreme operating conditions. Tests
were run for both refrigerant mixtures in a
range between 15 and 40 mass-percent
HFC-32. For all these  compositions, the
pressures are expected to be well within
acceptable ranges.

Experimental Study
   Tests  over  a  wide range of mixture
compositions using an experimental HFC
heat pump apparatus with counterf low heat
exchangers show that refrigerant mixtures
HFC-32/-152a and HFC-32/-134a may be
considered replacements for HCFC-22 if
the appropriate mixture compositions are
chosen. Data indicate that multiple trade-
offs exist in mixture performance for differ-
ent system compressor speeds and mixture
compositions.
   If  results for HFC-32 and -152a are
compared at the same compressor speed
and capacity at which the HCFC-22 results
were obtained, the predicted improvements
in COP are very  close to the measured
COPs. These  improvements  over HCFC-
22 range from 14% for the high-tempera-
ture cooling mode  to  2%  for the low
temperature heating mode. Operating pres-
sures and temperatures of this mixture are
well within acceptable limits. The GWP of
the tested  mixture is about  25%  of the
value of HCFC-22. However, this zeotropic
mixture is flammable in the whole compo-
sition range.
   The other  mixture, .HFC-32/-134a, is
not predicted to perform as well  as the
HFC-32/-152a mixture. However, the test
results indicate that, for mixtures contain-
ing more than 35 mass percent of HFC-32,
the performance is very  similar to  that of
the HFC-32/-152a mixture. In the 'heating
mode, slightly higher COPs were obtained,
and in the cooling mode slightly lower COPs
were  measured (compared to the HFC-32/
-152a mixture at the same HFC-32 mass
fractions). The performance improvement
over that of HCFC-22 at the compressor
speed and capacity  equivalent  to the
HCFC-22 tests  ranges  from  5%  in  the
high-temperature mode to 2% in the low
temperature heating  mode.  Since HFC-
134a is not flammable, the HFC-32/-134a
mixture exists in  a certain range as a non-
flammable mixture. Flammability tests will
be conducted to determine this range. The
test results for the HFC-32/-134a mixture
show no problems with respect to extreme
pressures or temperatures in the tested
composition range.
    The achieved COP increases for both
mixtures offer enough potential that even
cross-flow heat exchange systems (as cur-
rently used in  household  heat  pumps)
should benefit from the use of these mix-
tures.
    The test results of the mixtures were
compared with those of HCFC-22 at the
same heating/codling  capacity. The test
results for the different  refrigerants were
achieved  with the same test apparatus,
meaning that there is no optimization with
respect to system pressure  drops, com-
pressor efficiency, and other operating fac-
tors.
                                                                        •&U:S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 - «48-0«OA4022K

-------

-------
  JQrgen PannockandDavidA. Didhn are with the National Institute of Standards and
    Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
  Robert V. Hendrlks is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
  The complete report, entitled "The Performance of Chlorine-Free Binary Zeotropic
    Refrigerant Mixtures in a Heat Pump," (Order No. PB92-149814/AS; Cost:
          $19.00, subject to change) will be available only from:
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield, VA 22161
          Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
          Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
 United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency
Center for Environmental
Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
EPA/600/SR-92/017

-------