United States
              Environmental Protection
              Agency
Risk Reduction
Engineering Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268
              Research and Development
EPA/600/SR-92/039   June 1992
EPA      Project Summary
               Exposure and  Release
               Estimations  for  Filter Press  and
              Tray  Dryer Operations  Based on
               Pilot  Plant  Data

               Mary C. Marshall, James R. Scott, and Hinton K. Howard
                This Project Summary discusses the
              findings from a pilot plant facility using
              a stationary tray dryer and a plate-and-
              frame filter press which were operated
              as part of the joint research effort be-
              tween the U.S. Environmental  Pro-
              tection Agency (EPA) and Southwest
              Research  Institute.  The worker expo-
              sure data, chemical release data, and
              observations from the pilot plant ex-
              periments expand the database for mak-
              ing engineering  assessments of
              Premanufacture Notice (PMN) materi-
              als which are fine solids (powders) and
              wet filter cakes.
                Worker exposures and chemical re-
              leases associated  with a plate-and-
              frame filter press and a stationary tray
              dryer were studied in a pilot plant. The
              equipment was representative of that
              in a chemical manufacturing plant; the
              filter press was previously used at a
              chemical plant, and the dryer trays were
              the same size used by dye manufactur-
              ers. A randomized series  of eight ex-
              periments identified the most influen-
              tial variables for inhalation exposure
              during operation of the tray drying unit,
              which  used  approximately 100 kg of
              calcium carbonate. The range of con-
              ditions studied in the eight experiments
              provide inhalation exposure data with
              more than two orders of magnitude for
              evaluating the impact on a PMN of the
              physical properties, the activities per-
              formed, and the worker's technique.
                The worker inhalation exposure for
              the tray dryer unit operation was con-
              trolled by the tray unloading  activity;
              92% of the time weighted  average
              (TWA) was attributable to the  tray un-
loading exposure even though this task
only took 30%  of the worker's  time.
Even when the  filter press was oper-
ated, the tray unloading activity domi-
nated. The pilot plant tray dryer TWA
ranged from  1.59  to  18.1 mg/m3 and
averaged 7.28 mg/m3. The inhalation ex-
posures associated with powders were
greater than those for wet filter cakes.
The worker technique could double the
inhalation exposure and in some cases
be responsible for more than an order
of magnitude difference. The particle
size distribution affected the physical
properties of the filter cake and caused
mixed results.  Small particles  gave
higher inhalation exposures during the
cake removal  stage, but the large par-
ticles gave higher inhalation exposures
during the tray unloading stage. Excel-
lent linear correlations between inhala-
tion exposure and  effective generation
rate for ithe large range of pilot  plant
conditions indicate potential success
for  building an inhalation  exposure
model baised on  generation rates.
  Chemical releases for the tray drying
unit operation for powders  and  filter
cakes were 0.7 to 1.5 wt% of the batch
size  in the pilot plant. The chemical
release for the disposal of used filter
media ranged from 0.37 to 0.85 wt% of
the  batch size.  Worker dermal expo-
sures for cake removal were 0.039 to
0.60  mg/cm2, for  tray loading were
0.0076 to  0,063  mg/cm2, and for tray
unloading were 0.0048 to 0.067 mg/cm2.
  This Project Summary was developed
by EPA's Risk Reduction Engineering
Laboratory, Cincinnati,  OH, to announce
key findings  of the research project
                                                             Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
that Is fully documented in a separate
report of the same title  (see Project
Report ordering information at back).

Introduction
  As one component of Section 5 of the
Toxte Substances Control Act (TSCA), the
EPA must estimate the exposures (inha-
lation and dermal)  and  releases  associ-
ated with the manufacturing  of  a new
chemical. To assist engineers  making
these estimates, EPA has  compiled his-
torical, 8-hr TWA inhalation exposure data
for various job classifications. The  PMN
includes a process f tow diagram and esti-
mates of the number of workers and time
required  to perform a given task. Based
upon this information, EPA must select a
job classification which  most closely  re-
lates to the PMN and then extrapolate the
8-hr TWA to the new chemical. Inhalation
exposure data for unit operations would
Improve  the  workplace inhalation expo-
sure estimations.
   Dermal exposure estimations suffer from
a lack of sufficient historical data for work-
place dermal exposures. Several experi-
mental research efforts have  been con-
ducted for  EPA with liquid compounds to
obtain dermal  exposure data; however,
until now the data obtained  on dermal
exposure to  powders has not been spe-
cifically directed at improving the  PMN
review process information.
   Historical chemical release data are not
available to the PMN reviewer on a unit
operations basis. Guidelines for  estimat-
ing releases  to water and disposal of filter
media to landfill or incineration have been
developed for the  PMN system; however,
a  more  complete  database of chemical
releases is needed.
   Research  began in August  1986  to (1)
improve estimates for workplace exposures
and chemical releases and (2) explore the
feasibility of developing predictive models"
for chemical releases and  worker  expo-
sures for filtration and drying  unit opera-
tions. These two unit operations were se-
 lected because of their high frequency of
 appearance  on PMN forms. Ten  principal
 equipment types were  considered  within
the unit operations (six kinds of filtration
 equipment and four kinds of drying equip-
 ment). Fitter presses and tray dryers were
 selected for study because of their high
 potential for inhalation exposure. Because
 of the expense  and inability to identify
 appropriate  manufacturing  sites  for data
 collection, it was decided to do the stud-
 ies on a pilot plant scale.

 Procedure
    A filter  press was obtained which  had
 baen used  in a chemical  manufacturing
 process, and a new stationary tray dryer
 was purchased. In the pilot plant, a series
 of randomized experiments  were  con-
 ducted in  a controlled environment (i.e.,
 modified ventilation systems and one unit
 operation per room to prevent cross-con-
 tamination). During the pilot plant  experi-
 ments, sampling  protocols for effective
 generation  rate, short term area concen-
 tration data, dermal exposures, and chemi-
 cal releases were evaluated to  identify
 whether the methods and prediction mod-
 els would be practical for field work.
    Calcium  Carbonate was the chemical
 used  in these experiments; because it is
 inexpensive, non-toxic, available in a range
 of particle sizes, and has low water solu-
 bility.
    Eight experiments were performed uti-
 lizing  a factorial design for two levels for
 each  of three factors: two research tech-
 nicians as operators,  two size distribu-
 tions  of CaCO3, and two initial conditions
 of the material. Regarding the last factor,
 the initial condition was either a dried pow-
 der or a filter cake  (the latter was pro-
 duced by processing a 10 wt% slurry of
 CaCOg in  water  through the plate-and-
 frame filter press). The drying experiments
 consisted of:  loading approximately 100
 kg of CaCO3 onto 11 trays, drying the
 material in a mechanical convection oven,
 and unloading the dried  material into a
 single container. The tray loading  and un-
 loading areas were located in a room that
 possessed a high air exchange rate and
 well-mixed air circulation, but no local ex-
 haust ventilation systems.
    As preparation for  a pilot plant experi-
 ment with  an initial condition of wet filter
 cake, the CaCO3 was mixed with water jn
 a 380-gal tank to give a 10 wt% CaCO3 in
 water slurry. An 18-in. by 18-in., 15-cham-
 ber, plate-and-frame filter press was used
 to filter this slurry. The mixing and filtra-
.- tion -activities were  performed within  a,,
  metal-frame building in an area which was
  separated from a warehouse by  floor-to-
  ceiling black polyethylene sheets. No modi-
  fications were made to the general venti-
  lation system in this filtration  area.
    A mechanical convection oven  (Blue M
  Model DC-136C)* with an internal volume
  of 0.75 m3 was used as the stationary-tray
  dryer. The oven was located in a second
  room which was significantly modified to
  provide a well-mixed, high exhaust turn-
  over rate for the detailed study of genera-
  tion  rate. One tray dryer batch consisted
  of approximately  100 kg of CaCO3 (dry
  weight basis) loaded onto eleven 94 x 48
  cm trays.
  The factorial experiment was designed
to study the response  variable,  worker
inhalation exposure (mg  of CaCO. / m3 of
air).  The analysis of  variance  (ANOVA)
tables were also developed for two other
response variables, dose [(mg of CaCCy
(minute) / (m3 of air)] and mass of chemi-
cal spills [kg spill / kg product]. The dose
variable  is  calculated by multiplying the
inhalation exposure  for a  given  activity
(cake removal, tray  loading,  or tray un-
loading) and the activity's duration. Other
response variables of interest for the pilot
plant experiments were generation rate
(mg  CaCO3/sec), chemical  release (kg of
CaCO3), and worker dermal exposure (mg
CaCO3/cm2 skin). These variables were
assessed for linear correlations with vari-
ous  parameters.

Results and Discussion
   One  of the factors that can affect the
airborne concentrations within  a work area,
and  subsequently the inhalation exposure
of the operators, is the ventilation charac-
teristics of the work area. To enhance the
evaluations associated  with  the genera-
tion  rate models, the drying room was
deliberately equipped with a ventilation
system that would create a well-mixed air
flow pattern inside the  room. The drying
room was  designed to  have  an average
room air exchange  rate of 8.7 changes
per  hr  and an average mixing factor  of
1.03 which indicates perfect mixing condi-
tions within the error range  of the  mea-
surements. The air exchange  rate and the
mixing  factor of the  drying room  may be
better than those values found in typical
industrial facilities. Conversely, the filtra-
tion room's average air exchange rate of
5.0  changes per hr and mixing factor of
0.88 are probably more consistent with
the  levels existing in actual chemical manu-
facturing plants.
   To. characterize a .worker's;, inhalation
 exposure for an  entire unit operation, the
 TWA exposure is  commonly used. The
 TWA inhalation  exposure  to CaCO3  in-
 curred  by  the pilot  plant workers during
the  tray dryer operation can be calculated
 using the following formula:
                      tucu)/T
 where:
   ' Mention of trade names or commercial products does
   not constitute endorsement or recommendation for
   tL = time of the loading stage
   CL= calcium carbonate concentration
       measured in the breathing zone of
       the operator during the loading
       stage
   tu o time of the unloading stage
   c = calcium carbonate concentration
       measured in the breathing

-------
      zone of the operator during the un-
      loading stage
  T - total time operator was involved
      with the tray  dryer operation
  Since the operator was not present dur-
ing the drying  stage (i.e., the inhalation
exposure was zero), this stage is not  in-
cluded in the TWA calculation. The geo-
metric mean TWA inhalation exposure for
the drying  unit operation  was 7.28  mg
CaCO3/m3.  The unloading  activity  ac-
counted for 92% of the overall inhalation
exposure  even  though it  accounted for
only 30% of operator's time. This com-
pares with  a previous  in-plant study of a
recessed filter  press where  72% of  the
TWA inhalation exposure  for the  entire
filtration operation was attributable to the
cake removal stage even though only 1 5%
of the operator's time was required for this
activity. Therefore, for the two unit opera-
tions of interest, filtration and drying, one
worker activity  for each unit  operation  is
attributable  to  the majority of inhalation
exposures.
  The three main factors (worker, particle
size distribution, and material condition)
significantly affected  (p < 0.05) worker
inhalation exposures for all three  unit op-
eration activities with the exception of the
particle size distribution for  the  loading
activity. In the performance of all activities
associated  with the  stationary-tray dryer
and the plate-and-frame filter  press,
Worker B consistently experienced higher
inhalation exposures. During  the removal
of filter cake from the filter press, inhala-
tion exposures were higher for the smaller
particle size distribution. The  particle size
distribution  had no  significant effect on
inhalation exposures during the tray load-
ing activity.  During the tray unloading ac-
tivity, inhalation exposures to the larger
particle size distribution were greater than
those to the small particle size distribu-
tion. Finally, inhalation  exposures to  the
powdered material (i.e., dry initial condi-
tion) for the tray loading and tray unload-
ing stages were higher than for the mate-
rial which was processed through the plate-
and-frame filter press.
   For  the manual filter press and tray
drying  unit operations, one worker activity
for each unit operation is attributable to
the majority of inhalation exposures (92%
of tray dryer TWA and 30% of the worker's
time is associated with tray unloading ac-
tivity).
   When both filter press and tray drying
unit operations are being performed, the
inhalation exposures are overwhelmingly
controlled by the tray  unloading  activity.
The tray  unloading  inhalation exposure
(8.63 to 49.4 mg/m3) was one to two or-
ders of magnitude greater than those re-
ceived during the  remaining tray dryer
(0.20 to 2.38 mg/m3 for tray loading and
negligible for drying) and filtration  (0.13 to
0.73 mg/m3 for cake removal) operations.
   In the tray dryer operations, worker tech-
nique,  particle size distribution, and mate-
rial condition significantly affect worker in-
halation exposures and are each  capable
of producing a range of inhalation expo-
sures greater than one order of  magni-
tude.
   Pilot plant  tray dryer overall TWA inha-
lation exposure  was 7.28  mg/m3 with a
range of 1.59 to  18.1 mg/m3. It is conceiv-
able that  different workers  and  greater
distinctions in CaCO3  size ranges could
make exposures even more variable. Con-
sequently, data  collection  activities with-
out development of predictive models will
not provide the PMN reviewer with a reli-
able order of magnitude estimate for inha-
lation exposures.
   Inhalation exposure concentrations are
approximately the  same for the cake re-
moval  (0.13 to 0.73 mg/m3) and the tray
loading (0.22 to  0.68 mg/m3) activities for
wet filter cakes which may imply  that the
physical principles  responsible for genera-
tion of the aerosols are similar for these
tasks.
   Total chemical releases for the tray dryer
 unit operation when fine solids (powders)
 are being handled (0.7 to  1.5  wt%) are
 higher than the current PMN guidelines of
-0.1% to 1.0% of batch size (i.e., product
 yield).
   The mass of wet filter cake  lost from
 trays during! their transfer into and out of
 the dryer shelves is the greatest source
 for chemicail releases during tray  drying
 operations and  are as high as  2.84% of
 product yield.
   For filter cloths that are washed prior to
 disposal, the  current  PMN guideline  for
 chemical releases to the landfill or incin-
 erator (i.e.,  0.5% of a batch) is an  appro-
 priate estimate for the amount of material
 retained within the filter cloth.
   For unwashed filter cloths, the chemical
 release associated with cloth disposal is
 0.7% of a batch.
   Worker dermal exposures during cake
 removal operations (0.039 to 0.60 mg/cm2
 skin) are less than the criteria  stated in
 current PMN  guidelines (1  to  3 mg/cm2
 skin developed from contact with liquids).
   The pilot plant data of 0.0076 to 0.063
 mg/cm2 skin for dermal exposures associ-
 ated with tray loading activities can  be
 used for  PMN  materials which  are fine
 solids or filter cakes.
   The pilot plant dermal exposures from
 activities  associated with high  tempera-
 tures (e.g., Ithe tray unloading activity) are
 higher than the current PMN guidelines
 (the pilot plant exposures were 0.0048 to
 0.067 mg/cm2 skin and PMN guidelines
 advise "negligible" exposure). The dermal
 exposure during high temperature opera-
 tions stems from fine solids falling into the
 worker's gloves, and from contamination
 between  experiments  since the  gloves
 were not exchanged for new ones be-
 tween experiments.
   This report was submitted in partial ful-
 fillment of  Cooperative Agreement CR-
 813355 by  Southwest Research Institute
 under the partial sponsorship of the U.S.
 Environmental Protection Agency.
                                                                                       •U.S. Governmant Printing Office: 1992— 648-080/60023

-------
 Mary C. Marshall and James R. Scott are with the Southwest Research Institute,
   San Antonio,  TX 78228; and Hinton K. Howard is with the Risk Reduction
   Engineering Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
 John O. Burckle is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
 The complete report,  entitled "Exposure and Release Estimations for Filter Press
   and Tray Dryer Operations Based on Pilot Plant Data," (Order No. PB92-
   158450/AS;  Cost: $43.00; subject to change) will be available only from:
        National Technical Information Service
        5285 Port Royal Road
        Springfield, VA 22161
        Telephone: 703-487-4650
 The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
        Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
        Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Center for Environmental
Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
Official Business
Penally for Private Use $300
EPA/600/SR-92/039

-------