United States  ,
               Environmental Protection
               Agency
Air and Energy Engineering
Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
               Research and Development
EPA/600/SR-94/007  March 1994
EPA       Project  Summary
               Improved  Equipment Cleaning  in
               Coated and  Laminated  Substrate
               Manufacturing Facilities
               (Phase I)
               Beth W. McMinn and Jill B. Vitas
                As a result of the Pollution Preven-
              tion Act of 1990, the Environmental Pro-
              tection Agency (EPA) established the
              33/50  Program which calls for volun-
              tary industry reductions in releases of
              17 high-priority toxic chemicals, listed
              by mass of emissions:
                    Toluene
                    Xylenes
                    1,1,1-Trichloroethane
                    Dichloromethane
                    Methyl Ethyl Ketone
                    Chromium and Compounds
                    Lead and Compounds
                    Cadmium and Compounds
                    Carbon Tetrachloride
                    Trich loroethy lene
                    Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
                    Tetrachloroethylene
                    Benzene
                    Chloroform
                    Nickel and Compounds
                    Cyanide and Compounds
                    Mercury and Compounds
                The goal of the 33/50 program is to
              reduce the total amount of these chemi-
              cals released into the environment and
              transferred off-site by 33% by the end
              of 1992 and by 50% by the end of 1995.
              These reductions will be based upon
              the Toxic Release Inventory System
              (TRIS), with 1988 as the base year.
                This Project Summary was developed
              by EPA's Air and Energy Engineering
              Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
              Park, NC, to announce key findings of
              the research project that is fully docu-
              mented in a separate report of the same
              title (see Project Report ordering infor-
              mation at back).
Introduction
  In support of the 33/50 Program and
EPA's pollution  prevention goals, the
Agency's Air and Energy Engineering Re-
search Laboratory (AEERL) is investigat-
ing ways to reduce air emissions of these
17 chemicals through pollution prevention.
The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 de-
fines pollution prevention as "any practice
which reduces the amount of any hazard-
ous substance, pollutant, or  contaminant
entering  the waste stream or otherwise
released to the environment (including fu-
gitive emissions) prior to recycling, treat-
ment, or disposal; and reduces the hazards
to public health and the environment as-
sociated  with the release of such sub-
stances, pollutants, or contaminants."
Pollution prevention efforts offer economic
and reduced health  and ecological risk
benefits to  many sectors of society that
are not available through traditional pollu-
tion control methods.
  In 1991, AEERL representatives met
with industry, academia, and state envi-
ronmental agency representatives to iden-
tify several source categories deserving
of pollution  prevention research. Two cri-
teria were used to select the industrial
categories for study: annual  toxics emis-
sions and the potential for pollution pre-
vention opportunities. First, the TRIS was
reviewed to identify  categories with the
greatest  mass  emissions of the 33/50
chemicals. Categories with the greatest
emissions were then ranked  according to
the potential for successful pollution pre-
vention projects resulting in significant re-
ductions of 33/50 chemical releases. One
of the industries identified during the 1991
                                                              Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
meeting was the adhesives-coated  and
laminated  paper  manufacturing  industry
[Standard  Industrial  Classification (SIC)
2672]. This industry was chosen because
of significant air emissions of 33/50 Pro-
gram chemicals methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)
and toluene as reported through the TRIS.
  In October 1991, a meeting was held
between AEERL, pollution prevention ex-
perts, and representatives' of the adhe-
sives-coated  and  laminated  paper
manufacturing industry to discuss specific
pollution prevention  projects that  would
support the 33/50 Program. Meeting  par-
ticipants indicated that emissions  of tolu-
ene and MEK from  equipment cleaning
operations are  second only to emissions
from the coatings and coating application
steps,  and,  therefore,  would present a
good  opportunity for the  implementation
of pollution  prevention techniques. As a
result of this meeting and preliminary in-
dustry inquiries, the scope of the industry
investigation  was later  expanded to in-
clude other coating and substrate variet-
ies (such as  those  included  in  SIC
2671-Coated and Laminated  Packaging
Paper and  Plastics Film)  because the
manufacturing methods and cleaning pro-
cesses  are similar; therefore,.technology
transfer is possible over a wider range of
Industries.

Project  Objectives
  This  report presents  the results of a
Phase  I  study to  characterize  current
equipment cleaning practices in the coated
and laminated substrate manufacturing in-
dustry, to identify alternative cleaning tech-
nologies,  and  to identify demonstrable
technologies and estimate their emissions
impacts. In  order to successfully accom-
plish  these  objectives, information  was
collected from  several sources including
literature  searches, industry  question-
naires,  plant visits,  pollution prevention
experts, and industry and trade associa-
tion personnel.
   Literature searches of EPA on-line da-
tabases, local university library databases,
and Dialog9 were conducted. The Pollu-
tion Prevention Information Clearinghouse
(PPIC)  and the Pollution Prevention Infor-
mation  Exchange System (PIES) were ac-
cessed on a biweekly basis. The E-Mail
capabilities  of PIES were  also used to
communicate with other PIES users with
knowledge of the coated  and laminated
substrate manufacturing industry.
   The  second  source  of  project back-
ground information  was data retrieved
through industry questionnaires. Two ques-
tionnaires had been distributed earlier to
 14 adhesive-coated  and laminated paper
manufacturers,  primarily pressure  sensi-
tive tape manufacturers and tag and label
manufacturers.  A separate questionnaire
was prepared for manufacturers operating
under either SIC 2672 or  SIC 2641 (Pa-
per Coating anc Glazing) depending  on
their SIC. Neither questionnaire was sent
to more than eight  manufacturers. The
results of the q jestionnaires were clari-
fied through folbw-up contacts with the
recipients and through revised question-
naires. Over 30 additional facilities (i.e.,
not recipients  cf the  original  question-
naires) were coitacted for further infor-
mation on equipment cleaning practices.
The second grojp of facilities contacted
represented the expanded scope  of the
research project,  and consisted of facili-
ties involved in the coating and laminating
of flexible substrates (SIC 2671) as well
as those included in  SIC 2672.
  In  addition  t3 conducting  literature
searches and  distributing two  industry
questionnaires, contacts were made with
industry  and po lution prevention experts
with the Massachusetts Office of Technol-
ogy Assistance (OTA), the North Carolina
Office of Waste)  Reduction  (OWR), the
Pressure Sensitive Tape Council (PSTC),
the Tag and Label Manufacturers Institute
(TLMI),  and equipment  manufacturing
firms.
  The final souroe of project and industry
information  was compiled during  seven
site visits (two of which were conducted
previously). The trip reports  and  associ-
ated  data for these facilities were com-
bined with the  hformation resulting from
the additional fi/e trips. Together, these
information gathering efforts provided the
background needed to accurately describe
the coated and laminated substrate manu-
facturing  industry, to evaluate the range
of equipment cleaning methods used in
the industry, to  identify demonstrable tech-
nologies, and tcj>  form the foundation for
the project's Phase II and  III efforts.
   Phase II activities will  begin upon  the
completion  of  Phase I. Phase II  of  the
project will be tr e actual demonstration of
selected alternative technologies. This
phase will quant fy air emissions and other
media wastes, 'ecord production param-
eters, and maks other observations and
measurements necessary to assess  the
impacts of the a ternative technology. The
final phase of tf e project  (Phase III) is to
conduct  technology transfer. Focused
documents suci as conference  papers,
journal articles, and newsletters  will be
prepared and prssented at industrial work-
shops, pollution prevention conferences,
and other events where industrial applica-
tion of pollution Drevention technologies is
discussed.
Report Organization

  This report is divided into five chapters
and three appendices. Chapter 2 identi-
fies and describes current manufacturing
and cleaning practices. It includes an over-
view of the industry's use of  raw materi-
als, coating application equipment, current
cleaning techniques, current cleaning sol-
vents, and resulting waste streams.
  Chapter 3  describes  the evolution of
the industry questionnaires and the meth-
odology by which the recipients were se-
lected. Chapter 3 also summarizes efforts
to compile and tabulate the questionnaires'
results. This chapter identifies current in-
dustry trends in coating formulations, cur-
rent trends  in equipment cleaning
methodologies and technologies, and op-
portunities for pollution prevention research
as indicated by the questionnaire respon-
dents.
  Chapter 4 discusses some of the pollu-
tion  prevention  alternatives to currently
used equipment cleaning techniques and
materials. This chapter also briefly identi-
fies some of the opportunities for retrofit-
ting current processing equipment to allow
for the use of waterbased coatings.
  Chapter  5 summarizes and evaluates
pollution  prevention demonstration oppor-
tunities. Appendix A lists coated and lami-
nated substrate facilities with annual sales
greater than  $1  million. Appendix B  lists
SIC 2671  and  2672 facilities and their
associated emissions as  they appear in
the TRIS. Appendix C contains reports of
the seven trips involved in this investiga-
tion and  identification  of the  improved
equipment cleaning methods for the coated
and laminated substrate manufacturing in-
dustry.

Summary
   Facilities within the coated and  lami-
nated  substrate manufacturing  industry
tend to operate in one of two segments:
(1) large facilities operating coating lines
dedicated to one type of product, such as
masking tape or label stock; and (2) batch
processors  or  plants that  manufacture
comparatively small quantities of a wide
variety of high value-added products.
   Both segments of the coated and lami-
nated substrate manufacturing industry use
essentially the  same cleaning methods,
even though the segments differ substan-
tially in the range of substrates, coatings,
and application  equipment used at  the
plants.  The  solvents  required to clean
equipment in a coated and laminated sub-
strate  manufacturing facility are,  in large
part,  determined by the resin (e.g., rub-
ber) in the coating formulation.

-------
  AEERL plans to conduct demonstrations
in facilities that represent the two industry
segments. The first demonstration facility
will be a facility operating lines dedicated
to one product type. The focuses at this
facility would be the implementation and
evaluation  of  a cleaning solvent  substi-
tute,  improved operating practices, and
process modifications such  as  Teflon
coated  rollers. AEERL  has discovered,
through contacts with industry personnel,
that some  "dedicated  line" facilities  are
pursuing these options while others  are
not. The focus at the second type of facil-
ity, the batch processor, would be geared
toward improving the efficiency of clean-
ing operations. AEERL has found that the
nature of the batch processing business
requires a high degree  of cleaning  be-
tween jobs  and that  this cleaning often
takes place  much more frequently than
does  cleaning at dedicated line facilities.
The objective at the batch processor would
be to calculate  the minimum amount of
cleaning solution necessary to achieve the
required degree of cleanliness. A,second
objective at this facility would be to iden-
tify the  optimum method of administering
the cleaning solution. The details and the
results  of both facility studies  would be
documented in a final report. It is intended
that the case studies described in the final
report will  assist not only the  dedicated
line facilities and the batch  processors,
but also those facilities that have charac-
teristics of each.
                                                                       •frtl.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1994 - 550467/80210

-------

  B. W. McMinn andJ. B. Vitas are with TRC Environmental Corporation, Chapel Hill,
    NO 27514.
  Michael Kosusko is the EPA Project Officer (see below).  ,
  Tha complete report, entitled "Improved Equipment Cleaning in Coated and
    Laminated Substrate Manufacturing Facilities (Phase  l),r (Order No. PB94-
    141157; Cost: $27.00; subject to change) will be available only from
          National Technical Information Service
          5285 Port Royal Road
          Springfield, VA 22161
       ,  Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at
          Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
          Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Environmental Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300

EPA/600/SR-94/007
     BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35

-------