United States
                    Environmental Protection
                    Agency
 Air and Energy Engineering
 Research Laboratory
 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                    Research and Development
 EPA/600/SR-95/046
May 1995
w EPA     Project  Summary

                   Glycol  Dehydrator
                   BTEX and  VOC  Emission
                   Testing  Results  at  Two  Units in
                   Texas and  Louisiana
                   C.O. Rueter, D.L Reif, D.B. Myers
                     Glycol dehydrators are used in the
                   natural  gas industry to remove water
                   from natural gas and, in the process,
                   may also remove and emit significant
                   quantities of benzene, toluene, ethyl-
                   benzene, and xylenes (BTEX). The ob-
                   jective of this  project was  to collect
                   emissions test data at two triethylene
                   glycol (TEG) units to provide data for
                   comparison to  GRI-GLYCalc™, a com-
                   puter program  developed to estimate
                   emissions from  glycol  dehydrators.
                   Three analytical techniques were used
                   to determine emissions:  total capture
                   condensation, pressurized glycol cyl-
                   inders, and atmospheric  rich/lean gly-
                   col sampling.
                    Site 1 test results, using the various
                   techniques, yielded BTEX emission es-
                   timates  that  agreed reasonably well.
                   Total volatile organic compound (VOC)
                   emissions from the two  glycol meth-
                   ods did not match well with the total
                   capture benchmark results; this is con-
                   sistent with previous results for sys-
                   tems without flash tanks. Site 2 atmo-
                   spheric  rich/lean  glycol and pressur-
                   ized glycol emission  results  agreed
                   closely with the total capture  results
                   for both BTEX  and total  VOCs. GRI-
                   GLYCalc predictions using natural gas
                   samples taken  before the glycol ab-
                   sorber agreed well with the total cap-
                   ture results for total BTEX emissions.
                    This Project Summary was developed
                   by EPA's Air and Energy Engineering
                   Research Laboratory, Research Tri-
                   angle Park, NC, to announce key find-
                   ings of the research project that is fully
                   documented in a separate report of the
 same title (see Project Report ordering
 information at back).

 Overview
  The Emissions and Modeling  Branch
 (EMB) of EPA's Air and Energy Engineer-
 ing Research Laboratory was established
 to develop new and improved  emissions
 inventory methodologies for use by states.
 New improved methods are reviewed by
 the Emission Factor and Inventory Group
 of EPA's  Office of Air Quality Planning
 and Standards (OAQPS). New methods
 approved by OAQPS are incorporated into
 EPA guidance documents for state use in
 preparing  emissions inventories required
 by the Clean Air Act.
  Emissions estimation procedures for gly-
 col dehydrators are not available in cur-
 rent EPA emissions estimation  guidance.
 EMB held discussions with the Gas Re-
 search Institute (GRI) and the  American
 Petroleum Institute (API) and determined
 that they  were actively involved in the
 development of process models for esti-
 mation of emissions from glycol dehydra-
 tors. An industry working group, chaired
 by GRI, had begun a program to develop
 field testing methods and to collect emis-
 sions test data. The testing program and
 associated emissions model development
 were of immediate interest to EMB as a
 potential tool for estimating emissions from
 glycol dehydrators. EPA, GRI,  and API
 agreed that it would be appropriate for
 EMB to supplement the industry program
with an independent EPA testing program
to assess the acceptability of the process
emissions model as an approved method
for inclusion in EPA emissions estimation
                                                                  Printed on Recycled Paper

-------
guidance. This report describes two emis-
sions tesls conducted by EMB to assess
the current GRI glycol dehydrator emis-
sions model  GRI-GLYCalc™. Additional
tesls, not discussed in this  report, have
been performed by GRI and API at eight
other sites. These data will   also be re-
viewed prior to making a recommendation
on Including GRI-GLYCalc in EPA emis-
sions inventory guidance documents.
   Glycoi dehydrators are used to remove
water from natural  gas and, in the pro-
cess of removing the  water, may also
remove and emit significant quantities of
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xy-
lenes (BTEX).  The most common glycol
dehydrator design employs  an absorber,
with trielhylene glycol (TEG) used as the
absorbent, to remove water from natural
gas. In the absorption step, aromatic hy-
drocarbons such as BTEX  are also ab-
 sorbed into the glycol stream. Following
 the absorption step, the glycol, rich with
 water and BTEX compounds, is  distilled
 to strip water from the glycol. Recovered
 lean (dry) glycol is recycled  for use in the
 absorber.  Emissions of BTEX and other
 volatile organic compounds  (VOCs) oc-
 cur from the glycol reboiler still vent. As a
 result of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amend-
 ments, hazardous air pollutant emissions
 (primarily BTEX) from the reboiler still vent
 stream of glycol dehydrators have become
 a concern for the natural gas industry.
    Site 1, a gas plant in west Texas, was
 processing 3.6 million standard cubic feet
 per day (MMSCFD)" of gas without a flash
 tank and using a gas-driven pump. Site 2,
 in  southwest  Louisiana,  was processing
 4.9 MMSCFD  of gas with a flash tank and
 using a gas-driven pump. Testing was con-
 ducted over a 2-day period at each site.
 Three emissions measurement techniques
 were used at each site: total capture con-
 densation (the most accurate method) and
 two lower cost methods (pressurized gly-
 col cylinders  and atmospheric  rich/lean
 glycol). The lower cost methods were in-
 cluded in the test protocol to  evaluate
 their applicability as emissions screening
  tools where use of the total capture method
  • Conversion factors (or nonmetrfc units are listed at the
   end of this Summary.
may not be technically feasible  or eco-
nomically justifiable.
  In total capture condensation, the entire
still vent stream was passed through a
50-ft length of 1-in. diameter copper tub-
ing coiled inside a 55-gal  barrel and sub-
merged in an ice/water mixture. Con-
densed hydrocarbons, condensed water,
and noncondensable gas  were measured
and sampled. Results from total capture
condensation  were used as  the bench-
mark  against which other methods were
compared.
  The atmospheric rich/lean glycol method
used samples of glycol from both upstream
(rich) and downstream (lean) of the reboiler
collected at atmospheric pressure in vola-
tile organic analysis vials. Emissions were
calculated using the  difference in analyte
concentrationsTih the rich and lean samples
and the glycol circulation rate. Based on
sampling experience in the GRI project,
the glycol methods  may not produce a
representative sample for total  VOC de-
termination, particularly on systems with-
out a flash tank.
   The pressurized glycol cylinder method
used samples of glycol (rich) collected at
line pressure upstream of the reboiler in
stainless steel cylinders. Emissions were
calculated using the difference  between
the analyte  concentrations in the glycol
 cylinder and a lean  glycol  sample down-
 stream of the reboiler and the glycol circu-
 lation rate.
   GRI-GLYCalc  is a  computer program
 developed by GRI as an alternative screen-
 ing tool to estimate emissions from glycol
 dehydrators using process operating data
 and the composition of natural gas for the
 unit  of interest.  To evaluate the use of
 GRI-GLYCalc and alternative natural gas
 sampling methods,  five  types  of natural
 gas samples were collected and  analyzed:
    • Sub-atmospheric  pressure  canisters
     upstream of the absorber using, a sam-
     pling manifold;
    •  High-pressure cylinders upstream of
     the absorber with and without a sam-
      pling manifold; and
    •  High-pressure cylinders downstream
      of the  absorber with and  without a
      sampling manifold.
  Results
    The results of Site 1 testing, presented
  in tons per year plus or minus 1 standard
  deviation, are listed in Table 1. BTEX emis-
  sion  estimates  using  the various tech-
  niques agreed reasonably well. Prediction
  by GRI-GLYCalc of total BTEX emissions
  was close to the total capture results for
  some of the gas sample types. Quality
  control data, however, indicate that  the
  natural gas  BTEX concentrations for the
  cylinders may have been biased high,
  which caused the high prediction by GRI-
  GLYCalc. Total VOC emissions from the
  two glycol  methods  did  not  match well
  with the total capture benchmark results;
  this is consistent with previous results for
  systems without flash tanks.
	BesulisjDLSite.2 sampling.,ara Hstedjn =__
  Table 2. Atmospheric rich/lean glycol and
  pressurized glycol emission results agreed
  closely  with  the total capture results for
  both  BTEX and total VOC. Removal of
  volatile  components in  a flash tank up-
  stream  of the glycol sample point elimi-
  nates two-phase gas/liquid flow in glycol
  lines, thus allowing a more representative
  glycol sample. GRI-GLYCalc predictions
  using natural gas samples taken before
  the glycol  absorber agreed well with the
  total  capture results for total BTEX emis-
  sions.
     For these two test  sites, the  GRI-
   GLYCalc  model, using natural  gas
   sampled with evacuated canisters, agreed
   very  well  with  measured emissions as
   measured  by the  most accurate test
   method (total capture condensation) for
   each site. As shown in  Tables 1 and  2,
   the GRI-GLYCalc estimated emissions of
   BTEX and total VOC are within  10%  or
   less  of the  measured emissions.

   Metric Equivalents
     The following conversion factors are pro-
... ,vided for use^by- readers  more JamilLar_.
   with the metric system.

   Nonmetric    Multiplied bv   Yields metric
       °F
       ft
       ft3
       gal
       in
       psig
       ton
5/9(°F - 32)
    0.305
   28.3
    3.79
    2.54
    6.89
    0.907
°C
m
L
L
cm
kPa
tonne

-------
Table 1. Summary of Site 1 Emission Results*
Emissions (tons per year)
Method
Total Capture Condensation
Pressurized Glycol Cylinders
Atmospheric Rich/Lean Glycol
GRI-GLYCalc with Canister
Gas Samples
GRI-GLYCalc with Cylinder
Gas Samples Before Absorber,
with Manifold
GRI-GLYCalc with Cylinder
Gas Samples Before Absorber,
without Manifold
GRI-GLYCalc with Cylinder
Gas Samples After Absorber,
with Manifold
GRI-GLYCalc with Cylinder
Gas Samples After Absorber,
without Manifold
Benzene
1.25 ±0.32
1.22 ±0.1 6
1.24 ± 0.20
1.31
2.50

2.25

1.68

1.68

Toluene
1.68 + 0.29
1.81+0.25
1.85 + 0.28
1.87
3.68

3.40

2.29

2.26

Ethylbenzene
0.08 + 0.02
0.08 + 0.01
0.08 ±0.01
0.06
0.24

0.18

0.06

- 0.06

Xylenes
0.56 + 0.15
0.61+0.09
0.62 ±0.10
0.64
1.44

1.36

1.68

0.80

Total BTEX
3.58 ±0.61
3.71+0.51
3.79 + 0.59
3.88
7.86

7.18

5.71

4.80

Total VOC
19.8+4.0
10.7+ 1.9
11.4 + 1.8
21.8
28.2

28.3

25.5

23.7

-»«, , wasa '^oenyarator treating 3.6 MMSCFD of gas at 86°F and 659 psig;glycol circulation rate was 48.6 gal/hr.
Table 2. Summary of Site 2 Emission Results3
Emissions (tons per year)
Method
Total Capture Condensation
Pressurized Glycol Cylinders
Atmospheric Rich/Lean Glycol
GRI-GLYCalc with Canister
-Gas Samples ., ». .„ ,
GRI-GLYCalc with Cylinder
Gas Samples Before Absorber,
with Manifold
GRI-GLYCalc with Cylinder
Gas Samples Before Absorber,
without Manifold
GRI-GLYCalc with Cylinder
Gas Samples After Absorber,
with Manifold
GRI-GLYCalc with Cylinder
Gas Samples After Absorber,
without Manifold
aSit& P W/AQ a TPS3 rlohi/rlr&tnr im~
Benzene
6.02+1.04
6.71+0.98
5.62 ±0.76
5.22
5.55

5.62

3.93

4.35
>*inn A f\ tt M\ Jt-*f~\^r-t
Toluene
9.87 ± 1.50
11.1 ±1.6
9.25 ±0.93
8.63
8.94

8.51

5.69

6.32

Ethylbenzene
0.84 ±0.16
0.98 + 0.18
0.80 + 0.12
0.89
0.89

0.82

0.41

0.49

Xylenes
6.14 ±0.74
7.05 ±0.82
5.74 ± 0.40
7.58
6.13

5.33

2.87

3.48

Total BTEX
22.9 ±3.2
25.9 ±3.2
21. 4 ±2.0
22.3
21.5

20.3

12.9

14.6

Total VOC
36.9 ±3.1
37.9 ±4.9
30.8 ±3.4
36.1
32.7

31.1

23.3

25.3

were 205°F and 46 psig.

-------
 C Rueter, D. Reif, and D. Myers are with Radian Corp., Austin, TX 78720-1088.
 Charles O. Mann is the EPA Project Officer (see below).      •
 necompletereportconsists of two volumes, entitled "GlycolDehydratorBTEX and
   VOC Emissions Testing Results at Two Units in Texas and 'Louisiana
        "Volume I - Technical Report" (Order No. PB95-194130; Cost: $27.00,
                            s" (Order No. PB95-194148; Cost: 36.50, subject
         to change)
  Both volumes of this report will be available only from:
         National Technical Information Service
         5285 Port Royal Road
         Springfield, VA 22161
         Telephone: 703-487-4650
  The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
         Air and Energy Engineering Research Laboratory
         U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Research Triangle Park, NC 2771 1
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Environmental Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
 EPA/600/SR-95/046

-------