United States
                  Environmental Protection
                  Agency
National Risk Management
Research Laboratory
Cincinnati, OH 45268
                  Research and Development
EPA/600/SR-97/054     August 1997
&EPA      Project Summary

                  Theoretical  and  Experimental
                  Modeling  of Multi-Species
                  Transport  in  Soils  Under Electric
                  Fields
                  Yalcin B. Acar, Akram N. Alshawabkeh, and Randy A. Parker
                   This project investigated an innova-
                  tive approach for transport of inorganic
                  species under the influence of electric
                  fields. This process, commonly known
                  as electrokinetics uses low-level direct
                  current (dc) electrical potential differ-
                  ence across a soil  mass applied
                  through inert electrodes  placed in an
                  open flow arrangement.  The applica-
                  tion of low-level dc current across elec-
                  trodes placed  in the soil  mass causes
                  physiochemical  and hydrological
                  changes  in the soil-water-electrolyte
                  medium leading to contaminant trans-
                  port and removal.
                   The feasibility and efficiency of trans-
                  porting lead under electric fields  was
                  investigated in this study at pilotscale
                  in three one-ton Georgia kaolinite speci-
                  mens spiked with lead nitrate solution.
                  Electrode spacing was set at 72.4  cen-
                  timeters (cm). Tests were conducted
                  on specimens with a lead nitrate  con-
                  centration of 856  milligrams per  kilo-
                  gram (mg/kg) to 5,322 mg/kg. Pore pres-
                  sures and temperatures developed
                  across the soil mass, electric potential
                  distributions, pH distributions, and lead
                  transport were investigated.
                   The results  demonstrate that heavy
                  metals and species that are solubilized
                  in the anodic acid front can be  effi-
                  ciently transported  by electromigration
                  under an electric field applied  across
                  electrodes placed  in soils. After 2,950
                  hours of processing and an energy ex-
                  penditure of  700 kWh/m3, 55% of the
                  lead removed across the soil was found
                  precipitated within the last two cm close
                  to the cathode, 15% was left in the soil
 before the 2 cm zone, 20% was found
 precipitated on the fabric separating
 the soil from the cathode compartment,
 and 10% was unaccounted for. Overall,
 The project adequately demonstrated
 the potential applicability of the  pro-
 cess,  and it appears that the  process
 is appropriate for testing on  a larger
 scale.
  A theoretical model was also devel-
 oped  for multi-component species
 transport under coupled hydraulic, elec-
 tric, and chemical potential differences.
 A mass balance of species and pore
 fluid coupled  with a charge  balance
 across the medium resulted in a set of
 differential equations. Sorption, aque-
 ous phase and precipitation reactions
 were  modeled by  a set of algebraic
 equations.  Instantaneous chemical
 equilibrium conditions were assumed.
 Transport of H+, OH", and Pb2+ ions, the
 associated chemical reactions, electric
 potential, and  pore pressure distribu-
 tion across the electrodes in electroki-
 netic remediation were modeled. Model
 predictions of acid transport, lead trans-
 port, and pore pressure distribution dis-
 played agreement with the pilotscale
 results validating the  formalisms of-
 fered for multi-component transport of
 reactive species under an electric field.
 The model also  bridges the  gap be-
 tween the electrochemistry  and  me-
 chanics in electroosmotic consolidation
 of soils.
   This project summary was developed
 by the  National Risk Management
 Laboratory's Land Remediation  and
 Pollution Control Division to announce

-------
key findings of the  research  project
that is fully documented in a separate
report of  the same  title (see  project
report ordering information at back).

Introduction
  Electrokinetic  remediation technology
using low level dc electrical potential dif-
ference is shown in Figure 1. The applied
electrical current or electric potential dif-
ference leads to electrolysis  reactions at
the electrodes generating an acidic me-
dium at the anodes and an alkaline me-
dium at the cathodes. The  acids gener-
ated at the  anode advances through the
soil  toward  the cathode by  transport
mechanisms including  ion migration due
to electrical gradients, pore fluid  advec-
tion due to prevailing electroosmotic flow,
pore fluid flow due to  any externally ap-
plied or internally generated  hydraulic po-
tential difference, and diffusion due to gen-
erated  chemical gradients.  The  alkaline
medium developed at the cathode will first
advance toward the anode by ionic migra-
tion  and  diffusion. However, the  mass
transport of the H+ ions will neutralize this
base front preventing  its transport toward
the anode. Free chemical species present
in the pore fluid and/or desorbed from the
soil surface will be transported toward the
electrodes depending on their charge. The
primary driving  mechanisms  of species
transport  are  the  same  as  the acid  or
base transport mechanisms.  As a  result
of the transport of chemical species  in the
soil pore  fluid, cations will collect  at the
cathode and anions at the anode. Heavy
metals and other cationic species will be
removed from  the soil with the effluent,  or
they will be deposited at the cathode.
  Species transport mechanisms   under
electric fields  are  envisioned to be em-
ployed in  remediating soils from organic
and  inorganic  species (electrokinetic re-
mediation), injections of microorganisms
and nutrients in bioremediation, injections
of grouts  in soil  stabilization and  waste
containment, soil and pore fluid character-
ization and species extraction using pen-
etrating probes, diversion systems for con-
taminant plumes, and leak detection sys-
tems in containment barriers.

Methodology
  The  primary  objective of the pilotscale
testing was to  demonstrate removal  of
lead in the soil samples. Three pilotscale
tests (PST) were conducted using lead-
spiked  Georgia kaolinite. This mineral was
selected  for this study  because of its low
activity and  high electroosmotic water
transport efficiency  relative to other clay
minerals. Lead  nitrate [Pb(No3)2] salt was
used as the source  of lead because of  its
high solubility in water and  its ability  to
provide the necessary ionic forms of lead
and nitrate.
  Two pilotscale tests were conducted  on
kaolinite  spiked with  lead at concentra-
tions of about 856 micrograms per gram
(|ig/g)  and 1533 |ig/g.  A third pilotscale
test was conducted on  a kaolinite/sand
mixture spiked  with lead at a concentra-
tion of 5322 |ig/g.  Three rows of elec-


Extraction
exchange
II
F

(
3rocessing

\
\


Process control system


-**
t




t
•+

Extraction
exchange

II
Processing

— r



Figure 1. Schematic of electrokinetic soil processing showing migration of ionic species, transport of acid front and/or processing fluid across the process
         medium (Acar and Alshawabkeh)

-------
trades were  placed  in compartments  in
the soil. A polyacrylite frame was placed
in  each compartment to  hold the  elec-
trodes. Each cathode and anode  series
consisted  of a row of five equally spaced
electrodes with a center-to-center spacing
of 18.3 cm. The central row of electrodes
was designated as anode while the two
outer rows were designated as cathodes.
Electrode  row spacing was set at 72.4
cm. The  schematic diagram of the con-
tainer with electrode configuration  is shown
in  Figure 2.
   Since the electroosmotic flow  was ex-
pected to  occur from the anode toward
both  cathodes, a  water  tank was con-
nected to  the anode reservoir to supply
the required  amount of fluid flow.  Water
was collected from both cathode compart-
ments in separate  containers. In  order to
avoid introduction of advection due to ex-
ternal hydraulic potential  differences, the
hydraulic head was kept constant at zero
head  difference at the cathode and  anode
compartments during experiment. This pro-
vision permitted evaluation of the singular
effect of the  electrical potential gradients
on  water flow within  the  system. The
pilotscale sample in each test was com-
posed of two identical halves or cells. An
electrical current of 1.7 amperes (A) was
supplied to the sample  at the anode. This
current was divided to supply the two cells
with .85A each. The cross sectional area
of the soil treated was 6,398 cm2 (91.4 cm
width x 70.0  cm height)  and the applied
current density was 0.14 milliamperes per
centimeter  (mA/cm). Voltage probes, ten-
siometers,  and thermocouples were used
to monitor changes in voltage distribution,
suction, and temperature across one cell,
while the second cell was used to assess
the  concentration changes with time. Ex-
periment related parameters are  summa-
rized in Table 1.
  Pilotscale test specimens were sampled
before, during and after the test runs. For
the  first  pilotscale test (PST1),  the soil
was divided into three horizontal layers,
top  layer (layerl),  middle  layer (Iayer2)
and bottom layer (layerS). Each layer was
divided into 10 longitudinal sections of 7.0
cm  length and six lateral sections of equal
size. A total  of 180 soil samples  were
                             taken from the first pilot scale test. Each
                             sample represented a soil volume of 2703
                             cm3. The same sample  collection proce-
                             dure was used for the second (PST2) and
                             third (PST3) pilotscale tests, but with  dif-
                             ferent soil volumes  per sample. A total of
                             400 soil samples were collected from  the
                             second pilot scale test,  and 80 samples
                             were collected  from  the third  pilotscale
                             test.

                             Results and Discussion

                             Lead Transport
                               Three layers at different elevations were
                             analyzed for lead distribution in PST1. Fig-
                             ure 3 shows a three-dimensional contour
                             diagram of the mean and standard devia-
                             tion of  the  final lead  distribution  across
                             the middle layer in this test. Most of  the
                             lead was found precipitated in the  last
                             section  close to the cathode, which con-
                             tained about 54% of the  initial  lead. The
                             soil across the  electrodes (excluding  the
                             last section  ) contained about 40% of the
                             initial lead concentration, most  of which
                             was found in permitivity of the cracks that
                     Wooden
                     container
                     wall
                        Gundseal
                        0.32 cm thick.
                        HDPE/Bentonite
                        composite
                     6.35 cm x 76.2 cm
                     electrodes
                      Sampling tubes
                      (7 time intervals)
             Cathode
Anode
   O O O O
   o o o o
   o o o o
   o o o o
   J3"O O O
   o o o o
   o o o o
     o o o
     o o o
     o o o
     o o o
     o o o
     o o o
     o o o
                                                       Cathode
                                  Plexiglass
                                  frame
                                              Fabri-Net
                                              (geotextile-Gundnet
                                              composite)
                                                                                 12.7cm
                                                                                72.4cm
                                                                                 12.7cm
                                          9.1 cm
                                                      4 at 18.3cm      9.1 cm
Figure 2.  Schematic diagram of pilotscale test container and electrode configuration

-------
Table 1.  Initial Conditions for Pilotscale Tests



       Parameter                      Test 1
                                                         Test 2
                                                                                   Tests
Current (mA)



Container Dimensions (cm)
                                      850.0
                                                         1700.0
                                                                                  1700.0
Width
Depth
Length
Test Duration (hr)
Current Density (|iA/cm2)
Initial Soil pH
Initial Pb Concentration (|ig/g)
Initial Water Content (%)
Initial Dry Density (g/cm3)
Initial Saturation (%)
91.4
91.4
91.4
1,300
132.8
4.7
856
44.1
1.222
91
70.0
70.0
70.0
2,950
132.8
4.5
1,533
44.3
1.22
91
70.0
70.0
70.0
2,500
132.8
4.2
5,322
24.6
1.80
90
                            C/Cr
                                  100
                             Distance across

                             the anode (cm)      30
                                                  20
                                                     10
                                                                                                 100
                                                                                                    C/Cr
                                                                                       50
                                                                                           60
                                                                             30
                                                                        20
                                                                   10
40


Distance from

anode (cm)
                                                                (a)
                                  100
                                   10
                               o

                               y    1
                               o
                                  0.1
                                 0.01
                                             10       20      30       40       50


                                                         Distance from anode (cm)

                                                                   (b)
                                                                                         60      70
Figure 3.  Final lead concentration/initial lead concentration (C/C0) across the middle layer of PSTI (a) 3-D contour diagram and (b) mean and standard

          deviation.

-------
formed  in the soil due to  consolidation.
Approximately 1% of the initial  lead con-
centration was electrodeposited and/or pre-
cipitated at the electrodes.
  In PST2  most of the  soil across the top
layer (up to the  last 7 cm of the cathode
zone) displayed  more than 90% removal
with a final  concentration of less than 150
|ig/g. Most sections of the soil contained a
final lead concentration of less than 50
|ig/g, with  removal efficiencies of up to
98% of the initial  lead. The  bottom and
middle layers exhibited similar  lead con-
centration profiles. More than 90% removal
(up to  98% in most parts  of the layers)
was achieved across the  specimen. All
layers demonstrated that most of the lead
was transported  to the cathode zone. Fig-
ure 4 shows final lead concentrations and
the mean and standard deviation of final
lead concentrations across the middle layer
of PST2. Soil type, pore fluid chemistry,
and  pH were the major factors that af-
fected lead sorption and retardation.

Energy Expenditure
  Energy expenditure is evaluated per unit
volume of soil treated in units of kilowatt-
hours per cubic  meter (kWh/m3). Energy
expenditures in pilotscale tests increased
slightly with time within the first 500 hours
of processing to  about 50 kWh/m3, then it
increased linearly with time to about 325
kWh/m3 in  PST1 after 1300 hours,  700
kWh/m3 in  PST2 after 2950 hours,  and
700  kWh/m3 in PST3 after 2500 hours of
processing.  Energy costs  ranged  from
$16.3 to  $35 per cubic meter of soil  with
an electric  power cost of $.05/kWh.  The
results indicate  that steady state condi-
tions were realized within  the first  500
hours for PST1 and PST2, and within 700
hours for PST3.  Energy expenditure  was
directly related to the corresponding elec-
tric potentials. Nonlinear changes  in en-
ergy expenditure early in  the tests were
associated with  the increase in the total
voltage applied within the first 1000 hours.

SoilpH
  Final  pH distributions in PST2 across
the middle layer of Cell A are  shown  in
figure  5.  One-dimensional pH profiles
across the soil specimen were similar and
did not  display  significant changes with
depth. The results also indicated that the
pH within  the anode region decreased  to
about 2.5  in PST1  and to  1.5 in PST2.  In
the cathode region the pH remained within
the initial value in both tests (4.7 in PST1
and 4.5 in PST2). Slight differences in pH
between the two  tests at the anode region
could be related  to the differences in pro-
cessing  time (2950 hours for PST2 and
1300 hours for PST1). After 2950 hours  of
conducting PST2, the acid front moved  to
                              C/C0
                            Distance across
                            the anode (cm)
                                                                                          C/CC
                                                                          Distance from
                                                                          anode (cm)
                             O
                             O
1. 4
1.2



0.2
nn





: 	





	





• ,





*1





)
|
i
i
j
i
TlJt.



<

t -



)

---
                                           10      20      30      40

                                                     Distance from anode (cm)
                                                             (b)
                                                                         50
                                                                                60
                                                                                        70
Figure 4.  Final lead concentration/initial lead concentration (C/C0) across cell B in the middle layer of PST2 (a) 3-D contour diagram and (b) mean and
         standard deviation.

-------
                                    pH
                                          70
                                           60
                                            50
                                Distance across   49
                                the anode (cm)
                                               30
                                                                                          PH
                                                 20
                                                   10
                                                              (a)
B.U
7.0
I 5.0
CL
'5


1 n





-^ ^
__^r____,


Initial pH


* *



	


"""•"""•



r~*
X





-f--






5A






	
*



                                             10      20      30      40     50

                                                      Distance from anode (cm)

                                                              (b)
                                                                                60
                                                                                       70
Figure 5.  Final pH distributions across cell A in the middle layer of PST2 (a) a 3-D contour diagram and (b) mean and standard deviation.
30-35 cm from the anode. For PST1, the
acid front was at a distance  of 16 to 18
cm from the anode  after 1300 hours  of
processing.

Temperature Changes
  Thermocouples were used to  monitor
temperature changes across the  soil.  In
PST2, the initial temperature of the sample
before processing was 23°C. The tem-
perature increased at different rates across
the soil  and  at the  electrode  compart-
ments. Soil sections near the cathode ex-
perienced the highest increase  in tem-
perature  (23°C to 42°C) while the  anolyte
experienced the lowest increase  in tem-
perature  (23°C to 35°C). The  heat flux
due to electrical gradients was a function
of the  electric potential gradient and the
heat transfer conductivity of the  medium.
  The majority of the temperature increase
occurred during  the  first  1000 hours  of
processing. This temperature increase co-
incided with an  increase in  the  voltage
across the soil. Temperature changes be-
tween the soil and the electrode compart-
ments were related to the voltage distribu-
tion. Most of the voltage drop occurred at
the cathode region  resulting  in a  higher
increase in temperature in that zone.

Transport Modeling
  Test results from PST3 were used  for
comparison with a mathematical model of
coupled-reactive multi-component species
transport under an electric field in a satu-
rated soil. The modeling  of transport pa-
rameters result in a  system of differential/
algebraic equations. The partial differen-
tial equations describe fluid flow, charge,
and species transport,  while algebraic
equations describe the chemical reactions
in the soil pore fluid.
  Figure 6 compares the predicted lead
profile after 50 days to the measured pro-
file after 53 days. Both profiles display a
significant decrease in lead concentration
across the specimen. The predicted pro-
file  is lower than the measured profile in
the  first 40-45 cm  from the anode,  but
display similar qualitative agreement in the
cathode region. The  model  results  and
their comparisons with pilotscale test re-
sults demonstrate  that  the  principles  of
multi-species transport under an  electric
field can be formalized.

Conclusions
  Ionic migration is the  dominant trans-
port mechanism for heavy metals under
an electric  field, particularly when  the co-
efficient of  electroosmotic permeability is
less than 10~5 square centimeters per volt-
seconds (cmWs). The contribution of ad-
vective transport under  electric gradients
(electroosmosis) depends on the soil type.
However,  even when the coefficient  of
electroosmotic permeability is in the order
of 10~4 cmWs (e.g.  lower activity clays at
high water  contents), mass flux of H+ and
OH- ions are at least 10 times greater by
ion  migration than electroosmosis. At these

-------
                             1.4104
                             1.2 10
                               1 104
                          D)
                          ,§

                          T3
                          ra
                          
-------
   Yalcin B. Acar and Akram N. Alshawabkeh are with Electrokinetics, Inc., Baton
     Rouge, LA 70809, and Randy A. Parker is with the National Risk Management
     Research Laboratory
   Randy A. Parker is the EPA Project Officer (see below).
   The complete report, entitled "Theoretical  and Experimental Modeling of Multi-
     Species Transport in Soils under Electric Fields, "(Order No. PB97-193056; Cost:
     $49.00, subject to change) will be available only from:
           National Technical Information Service
           5285 Port Royal Road
           Springfield, VA 22161
           Telephone: 703-487-4650
   The EPA Project Officer can be contacted at:
           Land Remediation and Pollution Control Division
           National Risk Management Research Laboratory
           U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
           Cincinnati, OH 45268
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Environmental Research Information (G-72)
Cincinnati, OH 45268

Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300
      BULK RATE
POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         EPA
   PERMIT No. G-35
EPA/600/SR-97/054

-------