'
                          Office of Research and
                          Development
                          Washington DC 2O46O
                           Center for Environmental Research
                           Information
                           Cincinnati OH 45268
            Technology Transfer
Summary Report

The Causes and
Control of Activated
Sludge Bulking and
Foaming
                                       EPA/625/8-87/012

-------

-------
       Summary Report

The Causes  and Control of
 Activated Sludge Bulking
         and Foaming
              July 1987
               Prepared for
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     Center for Environmental Research Information
           Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
           EPA Contract 68-03-3252

               Prepared by
            Dynamac Corporation
            The Dynamac Building
            11140RockvillePike
           Rockville, Maryland 20852

-------
                                 Foreword

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has a responsibility to
collect and transmit technical information that can be of use to  members of the
public  involved  in operations that contribute to increasing  or  maintaining the
quality of the environment. In order to  be most effective, this effort must be
documented in a manner that facilitates the transfer of the technical information
to the public  for consideration  and use. This report is an effort to provide a
reference material on the causes and controls of sludge bulking and foaming  in
activated sludge treatment that can be readily understood,  but also includes suf-
ficient detail (in the appendices) to help plant operators control their systems.

-------
                               Contents
Chapter                                                             Page

1.0 Introduction	  1

    1.1 Definition of Problems	  1
    1.2 Overview of Activated Sludge Process	  1

2.0 Activated Sludge Floe	  5

    2.1 The Floe—Contents and Components	  5
    2.2 Filamentous Microorganisms	  5
    2.3 Definitions of Terms Used for Quantitative
        Description of Floe	  5
    2.4 Effect of Number  of Filamentous Microorganisms on
        Quantitative Floe Parameters	  8

3.0 Activated Sludge Bulking	  9

    3.1 Symptoms of Sludge Bulking	  9
    3.2 Role of Filamentous Microorganisms in Sludge Bulking	  9
    3.3 Factors Affecting  the Presence of Filamentous
        Microorganisms	  9
    3.4 Control of Activated Sludge Bulking  	:  ... 13

4.0 Activated Sludge Foaming	29
    4.1 Symptoms of Sludge Foaming	29
    4.2 Role of Filamentous Microorganisms in Sludge Foaming	29
    4.3 Factors Affecting the Presence of Nocardia	29
    4.4 Control of Activated Sludge Foaming  	29

5.0 Appendix 1—Methods for Microscopic Examination of Filamentous
    Microorganisms in Activated Sludge	33
    5.1 Sampling Methods	33
    5.2 Staining Procedures	34
    5.3 Examination Procedures  	38
    5.4 Counting Procedures	41

6.0 Appendix 2—Microscopic Identification of Filamentous
    Microorganisms	45

    6.1 Observation of Microorganism Characteristics	45
    6.2 Identification of Microorganisms	61
    6.3 Descriptions of Types of Filamentous Microorganisms	61

7.0 Appendix 3—Case Histories of Bulking Control
    Using Chlorination	77

References	85

-------
                             Figures
Number
Page
   1   Microscopic appearance of activated sludge floes	  6
   2   Effect of filamentous microorganisms on activated
       floe structure	  7
   3   Effect of filamentous microorganisms on floe
       structure	10
   4   Correlation of filament count and SVI	11
   5   Activated sludge process schematic	 . .	15
   6   Zone settling of activated sludge solids	16
   7   Clarification tank design and operation diagram	18
   8   Clarification tank thickening analysis example	21
   9   Step feed operation example schematic  	23
   10 Step feed operation example—plot of parameters	24
   11  Progressive effects of chlorination	27
   12 Nocardia foaming in activated sludge	32
   13 Floe "texture" in activated sludge	39
   14 Effect of filamentous microorganisms on floe .	40
   15 Filament abundance categories	42
   16 Trichome branching	48
   17 Examples of filament shapes	49
   18 "Color" of filamentous microorganisms	50
   19 Attached growth of epiphytic bacteria	51
   20 Appearance of sheaths	52
   21  Cell shapes	53
   22 Deposition of intracellular sulfur granules	55
   23 Gram staining  reaction	56
   24 Neisser staining reaction	57
   25 Thiothrix II	58
   26 Type 021N	59
   27 Thiothrix I	60
   28 Dichotomous key for filamentous microorganism
       identification	62
   29 Sphaerotilus natans	65
   30 Type 0041 and 0675	66
   31  Type 0914	67
   32 Begg/atoaspp.,type 1851, 0803, and 0092  	69
   33 Type 0961 and Microthrix parvicella	70
   34 A/ocard/aspp., and Nostocoida limicola	71
   35 Haliscomenobacter hydrossis type 0581, 1863, and
       0411	73
   36 Type 1702, 1852, 0211,  Flexibacterspp., and
       Bacillus spp	74
   37  Fungus	75
   38 Control of bulking by RAS chlorination	79
   39  Use of target SVI to control RAS chlorination
       dosage	80
   40 Comparison of RAS chlorination effectiveness	81
   41  SVI and chlorine dose to RAS	82
   42  SVI and chlorine dose to RAS	83
   43  SVI response to peroxide treatment	84
                               IV

-------
                               Tables
Number
   1
                                                                  Page
  Causes and effects of activated sludge separation
  problems	  2
2 Dominant filament types as indicators of conditions
  causing bulking	•	12
3 Bulking filamentous microoganisms that have been
  controlled by chlorination	25
4 Use of hydrogen peroxide for bulking control	26
5 Subjective scoring of filament abundance	41
6 Suggested format for filamentous microorganism
  identification worksheet	46
7 Summary of typical morphological and staining
  characteristics	,	63

-------
                         Acknowledgement

Major portions of this document are taken in whole or in part from the recent EPA
report,  "Manual on the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking and
Foaming," authored by David Jenkins, Michael G. Richard, and Glen T.  Daigger
under EPA Cooperative Agreement CR 811810.
                                  vi

-------
                                              Chapter1
1.0 Introduction
The reaction of wastewater with biologically active
sludge to  remove  degradable  pollutants  from  the
wastewater is a widely applied  treatment technique.
The microscopic organisms  in the sludge metabolize
the degradable constituents of the waste, utilizing the
products for growth  and releasing less  noxious by-
products into the treated water.

The activated sludge treatment  process consists of
two basic  unit  operations:  (1)  aeration,  and (2)
clarification.  These  operations   may  be  physically
separated or, as in a Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)
process,  may take place in the same unit. In aeration,
microorganisms are brought into contact with biode-
gradable wastes in the  presence of a  continuous
oxygen supply. In clarification, the solids (consisting
mostly of  the  active microorganisms  and metabolic
products) are allowed  to separate  from the liquid.
Some of this activated  sludge is then returned to the
aeration  tank,  while  the rest is removed from the
system as waste activated sludge for further treat-
ment and final disposal. The  clarified liquid  (effluent)
flows  from  the  clarifying  tank to final processing
(such as filtration or disinfection) before discharge.

The efficiency  of  this process depends  upon the
satisfactory functioning of both the biological oxida-
tion and the solids separation processes. This report
concentrates on  two problems that inhibit satisfac-
tory separation of sludge solids: (1) bulking, and (2)
foaming. The report also discusses  their causes and
presents means by which they may be controlled.

1.1  Definition of Problems

Several common  problems may arise in the separation
of activated sludge from wastewater (see Table 1). Only
two specific problems are considered in this report.
 7.7.7 Sludge bulking.
 This is a condition in which the sludge becomes very
 light, increases in volume, and  will not settle.  The
 specific cause of sludge bulking considered here is the
 overabundance of filamentous microorganisms in the
 sludge that extend from the floe and interfere with the
 compaction and settling of the sludge. The effects  of
the bulking are a  high  Sludge Volume  Index,  low
solids concentration in the return  and waste sludge,
and the  hydraulic  overloading of the solids handling
systems.  Under  these  conditions,  floating  sludge
flows out of the tank with the effluent, producing a
poor quality product.

7.7.2 Sludge foaming.
This is  a condition in which various kinds of foams
appear  on the surface  of aeration and  clarification
tanks. One type of foam occurs during startup of acti-
vated sludge plants and usually disappears once the
process  is  established.  A more troublesome  foam,
heavy and brown, can accumulate on the surface of the
aeration tank during normal operation, migrate to the
clarification tank, and is then discharged with the efflu-
ent. It may become so thick that it overflows the clarifi-
cation tank. As with bulking, the principal cause of this
type of foaming is the overabundance of filamentous
microorganisms. This report considers those foams
caused  by the presence of specific filamentous micro-
organisms in the floe, i.e., Nocardia ssp. and Microthrix
parvicella.

The deleterious effects of sludge  bulking and foaming
occur mainly  in the  clarification tank, and result  in
degradation of effluent  quality. The following  is an
overview of the  component steps  of the activated
sludge process in which these two problems occur.

1.2 Overview of Typical Activated Sludge
     Process

 7.2.7  Unit processes.
After preliminary treatment (e.g., screening and grit
removal) and primary treatment (settling), the influent
wastewater in a  typical activated  sludge treatment
plant flows into the aeration tank, along with  acti-
vated sludge returned from the secondary clarification
tank. In the aeration tank, the mixture is aerated, pro-
viding mixing to bring the wastewater and sludge into
close contact and  supplying oxygen  to the microorga-
nisms  in the sludge. The bacteria  digest the  biode-
gradable components of the wastewater. The mixture
of wastewater and sludge (mixed liquor) then flows to
the clarification tank, where settling of the sludge oc-
curs. The solids settle to the bottom of the tank, while
the clear effluent  is  drawn off. Some of  the settled

-------
 Table 1. Causes and Effects of Activated Sludge Separation Problems
    Problem
               Cause
                                                                                   Effect
 Dispersed growth
 Microorganisms do not form floes but
 are dispersed, forming only small
 clumps or single cells.
 Turbid effluent. No zone settling of
 sludge.                    ,
Slime (jelly)
Viscous bulking; (also possibly
has been referred to as Non-
filamentous bulking)
Pin floe or Pinpoint floe
 Microorganisms are present in large
 amounts of exocellular slirne. In
 severe cases the slime imparts a jelly-
 like consistency to the activated
 sludge.  ,


 Small, compact, weak, roughly
 spherical floes are formed, the larger
 of which settle rapidly. Smaller
 aggregates settle slowly.
 Reduced settling arid compaction
 rates. Virtually no solids separation in
 severe cases resulting in overflow of
 sludge blanket from secondary
 clarifier. In less severe cases a .
 viscous foam often is present.

 Low sludge volume index (SVI) and a
 cloudy, turbid effluent.
Bulking
Blanket rising
Filamentous organisms extend from
floes into the bulk solution and
interfere with compaction and settling
of activated sludge.
Denitrification in secondary clarifier
releases poorly soluble N2 gas which
attaches to activated sludge floes and
floats them to the secondary clarifier
surface.
High SVI —very clear supernatant.
Low RAS and WAS solids concentra-
tion. In severe cases overflow of
sludge blanket occurs. Solids handling
processes become hydraulically'
overloaded.                        '

A scum of activated sludge forms on
surface of secondary clarifier.
Foaming/Scum formation
Caused by (i) non-degradable
surfactants and by (ii) by the
presence of Nocardia spp. and
sometimes by the presence of
Microthrix parvicella.
Foams float large amounts of   >   .
activated sludge solids to the surface
of treatment units. Nocardia and
Microthrix foams are persistent and
difficult to break mechanically. Foams
accumulate  and can putrify.  Solids
can overflow into secondary effluent1
or overflow  tank freeboard onto
walkways.

-------
sludge is returned to the aeration tank,  while the ex-
cess sludge is removed for further treatment and final
disposal. Sometimes the return sludge is aerated in a
separate tank before it  is reintroduced to the main
aeration  tank, to  reactivate  the microorganisms  by
allowing  them to complete consumption of waste  re-
maining in the sludge.

1.2 2 Microbiological processes.
The character of municipal wastewater  is usually ex-
pressed  in terms of two parameters:  Five-day Bio-
chemical  Oxygen  Demand  (BOD5)  and  Suspended
Solids  (SS). BOD 5  indicates the amount of oxygen
that would be required for biological oxidation of the
waste. It is determined  by a  standard test wherein a
known amount of wastewater is mixed with a known
amount of oxygen, and the mixture is incubated for 5
days  at  20°C.  During  that time, bacteria  in  the
wastewater use  the oxygen to oxidize organic matter
in the waste. At the end of that time, the oxygen  re-
maining  in the mixture  is measured, and from  the
amount of oxygen consumed, the BOD5 in milligrams
per liter  is calculated. SS is  expressed in milligrams
per liter,  and is determined by filtering a  sample of the
wastewater and weighing the dried,  solid-containing
filter.  (Standard Methods 208D).

The objective  of the activated sludge  treatment proc-
ess is the reduction  of  both  the  BOD and SS of the
wagtewater.  Bacteria in the sludge convert organic
material  in the waste to more stable  material  and  in-
organic byproducts (CO2 , H2O)  and  cell  protoplasm
in the presence of oxygen. In order for this process to
proceed  at optimum  biological  activity,  the plant
operator needs to  determine  the appropriate ratio to
be maintained between  the food  supply. (BOD) in the
incoming wastewater and the mass of bacteria in the
aeration tank.

Other biological conversions that can take place in the
aeration  tank  are  phosphorus  removal  and nitrogen
removal. Both, of  these  materials  stimulate  natural
biological activity  in the  effluent-receiving  waters,
causing  a  decrease in   dissolved oxygen and  thus
resulting in a decreased  ability of  receiving streams to
support fish.

Nitrogen removal begins with the conversion  of am-
monia to nitrites and nitrates in the presence of oxy-
gen (nitrification, conversion  of Nitrogenous Oxygen
Demand   [NOD]).  Then  the  liquid  containing  the
nitrites and nitrates is placed under anaerobic condi-
tions with an  organic carbon  source for the denitrify-
ing bacteria (e.g., methanol or raw sewage) where the
nitrites and nitrates can  be converted to the  N2  gas
that is lost from the liquid (denitrification). This two-
step process is not accomplished at 100 percent effi-
ciency—some ammonia  remains  in  the  effluent. Fur-
thermore,  in  plants that   disinfect  effluent  with
chlorine, some ammonia in the effluent increases the
amount of chlorine needed to bring the effluent within
regulatory limits. Control of ammonia  conversion  is
maintained by careful control of the level of oxygen  in
the aeration tank, and by aging of the sludge to en-
sure the presence of nitrifying bacteria.

Phosphorus is incorporated into the protoplasm of the
new  cells  that  are  generated  when the  bacteria
multiply as they  oxidize the organic waste. Fifty to 90
percent of phosphorus in influent wastewater can be
removed by the  activated sludge process.

1.2.3 Physical plant.
Wastewater  enters  the typical  plant  and  receives
preliminary treatment.   This  may  include  use  of
screens (when there are many large floating solids),
comminutors  (grinders  to achieve size reduction), and
grit chambers (when there are inorganic suspended
solids).  This  is  usually, but not always, followed by
primary treatment in sedimentation tanks (for removal
of settleable solids).

The wastewater then  flows to the  aeration  tank.  In
some cases, the waste is mixed with return activated
sludge at a point outside the aeration tank,  and the
mixture then enters the tank. In other systems, the
waste and return sludge are mixed in the  aeration
tank. In the aeration tank, the mixture is aerated by
either a diffused air system (in which compressed air
enters the tank at the bottom of the tank, causing the
tank's contents  to circulate) or a mechanical  aeration
system (in which a blade or pump  is used to agitate
the surface or pump the mixture and toss it in the air,
and to .introduce  oxygen  and  mix the sludge  and
wastewater). The size of the aeration tank is a func-
tion of the length of time that the waste will remain  in
the tank.

After a suitable  contact period (e.g., 4 to 24 hours)
the mixture of  activated sludge and treated waste-
water,' called mixed liquor,  flows into the secondary
clarification tank, where the sludge settles out. This
tank must be carefully monitored so that the settled
sludge is removed at frequent enough intervals to pre-
vent it from accumulating and flowing out with the ef-
fluent, and to prevent anaerobic conditions.

The settled sludge removed from the clarification tank
is  usually split into two streams. Some is returned to
the aeration  tank,  and the rest  is  wasted  and dis-
posed,  usually  after  thickening  by  sedimentation,
centrifuging,  or  filtration. Sometimes the  return ac-
tivated sludge is reaerated to maintain aerobic condi-
tions  before its return to the aeration tank. The clear
effluent flows from the clarification  tank to  be disin-
fected and discharged from the plant.

-------
 7.2.4 Batch and continuous flow processes.
 In a batch operation,  material enters and leaves the
 tank only at the beginning and end of a full treatment
 cycle (including aeration  and settling).  All processes
 are performed in the  same tank, but  sequentially
 rather than simultaneously. The tank is filled,  aerated
 for a set time, aeration  is  shut  off,  the solids are
 allowed to settle, and the clear supernatant is drawn
 off to  allow  room  for the  next "batch"  of  raw
 wastewater. A  portion of the  sludge is retained to
 seed the next cycle.  The excess sludge is wasted.

 Most large activated sludge plants use the continuous
 flow process. In this process,  the  wastewater flows
 continuously from one tank to another through the
 system with a discrete process occurring in each unit.
 Each  process is therefore occurring continuously and
 simultaneously with  the other major treatment proc-
 esses. In such a system, a continuous flow of food
 (wastewater) and return activated  sludge enters the
 aeration tank, and a continuous flow of effluent and
settled activated sludge leaves the clarification tank.

-------
                                             Chapter 2
2.0 Activated Sludge Floe
The  activated sludge  process  produces a  mass  of
active microorganisms, which agglomerates  and floc-
culates in the system's aeration tank and secondary
clarification tank, and  which is capable of  oxidizing
organic matter in wastewater. Many of  the operating
problems that occur in activated sludge systems can
be  attributed to  various  characteristics  of  the acti-
vated sludge  floe. This section  presents a description
of the composition and contents of the floe.

2.1 The Floe — Contents and Components
Activated sludge  floe  is normally  composed of  a
widely varied assortment  of microorganisms and par-
ticle  sizes.   Particles  range  from  single  bacteria,
measuring 0.5 to 5   m, to large floes measuring 1 mm
(1,000 ^m) or more.

The primary  active population  of  the floe is  hetero-
trophic bacteria  (those that feed on organic matter),
including  Pseudomonas,  Achromobacter, Flavobacte-
rium, Alcaligenes,  Arthrobacter,  Citromonas,  and
Zooglea. Also present  in  smaller quantities are fungi,
protozoa, and metazoa. Floes also contain organic and
inorganic particles  from the  influent   wastewater,
"extracellular polymers"  that seem to  promote bio-
flocculation, and volatile matter.

Researchers have suggested that there are two levels
of structure  in floe. The "microstructure," which is
the basis for floe formation, consists of bacteria that
are able to "stick to" one another by microbial aggre-
gation and   bioflocculation.  The  "macrostructure,"
which consists of filamentous microorganisms, forms
a large network to which the floe-forming bacteria of
the microstructure can cling.

2.2  Filamentous Microorganisms
If a  particular  sludge  contains  only microstructure
bacteria,  and no macrostructure (filamentous) micro-
organisms, floes are small (averaging  approximately
75  ^m), round, and easily broken up in the aeration
tank. This results in an operational problem  known as
"pin floe." Such floe will settle rapidly, but will leave
large amounts of smaller particles still suspended in
the effluent.
Thus,  filamentous  (macrostructure) microorganisms
are extremely important to a good floe and efficient
production of a clear effluent (see Figure 1).

2.2.1  Effect of filamentous microorganism count on
       floe.
When filamentous microorganisms  are present in acti-
vated  sludge, they  form  a  network  to  which  the
smaller floe-forming bacteria can cling.  This promotes
the formation of larger floes,  which do  not  readily
break apart in the aeration tank, and which settle more
efficiently, mechanically removing  smaller particles as
they settle. These large floes are irregular in shape, in-
stead of small and spherical.

Activated sludge floe can have  a good balance of fila-
mentous and  floe-forming  bacteria, giving good  set-
tling characteristics  and a clear  effluent; have too few
filamentous  microorganisms, resulting in pin floe and
a poor-quality effluent; or  have too many filamentous
microorganisms, resulting in bulking (see Figure 2).

2.2.2 Examination of filamentous  microorganisms in
       floe.
In order to  effectively manage operational problems
caused by filamentous microorganisms,  it is important
to know not only how many are present, but also what
types (see Section 3). Microscopic examination of floe
will  yield data on  microorganism  number and type,
and on physical floe characteristics that influence set-
tling. Appendices 1  and 2 present  specific information
about methods for performing such examination, in-
cluding procedures for sampling,  staining,  counting,
and identifying organisms.

2.3  Definitions of Terms Used for
      Quantitative Description  of Floe
Several quantitative parameters exist for the descrip-
tion of activated sludge  floe.  These  parameters are
defined below.

2.3.1 Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS).
The contents of the aeration  tank is referred to as
mixed liquor. It contains suspended microorganisms
and other sludge components. MLSS is an expression,
in mg/l,  of the amount of microorganisms suspended

-------
       1. Microscopic appearance of activated sludge floes: a. small, weak floes (pin-floe) (100 x phase contrast); fa. small, weak floes
         (100 X phase contrast); c. floes containing microorganisms (100 x phase contrast); d. floe containing filamentous microorganisms
         "network" or "backbone" (1000 x phase contrast) (a and cbar=100ftm; fa and dbar=10^un).


                  §Jn,  	~ii-,	:	tj-r;,	ijifiii;^wfil
               ,	i	2	,	iigf*	•
                                   fit	i;!  ifiBSSEffiSjjS
                        '-=	'	:	»	:ils	si	•	!	a*	Pl
                               	'	•	l!	•	!
        (V f •'»»-•!=".  '  "'  '  '"'""r  "'|l:':l, --'	"'""•''""-"ri!*  ^Pfiipiwfi1;*
        'Sfjt^,:1	^jpVy;;	;,;;,	^^ti.i;:	:^^SS3S  ^Sjii+ffif
        i!1	r	'&	*	;""i""!	'"	;	"	:	'	!:i11""""	?T^!rtr!st!WK
                    -;;-;-      ?"ftSSHim'S
Reference: Jenkins, era/., 1984.

-------
Figure 2. Effect of filamentous microorganisms on activated sludge floe structure.
         A. Ideal, Non-bulking Activated Sludge Floe.
                                                     1. FILAMENTOUS ORGANISMS AND FLOG
                                                       FORMMG ORGANISMS IN BALANCE

                                                     2. STRONG, LARGE FLOC

                                                     3. FILAMENTS DO NOT INTERFERE
                                                     4. CLEAR SUPERNATANT
                                                     5. LOW SVI

                                   FILAMENT BACKBONE
         B. Pin-point Floe.
• 'C1
* (r * f'x
U Cx
£'<2
^sX
p . ;
/~\ -
Q tf ^
. P-O 1. NO FILAMENTOUS ORGANISMS
; ^^^
* ^ 2. WEAK, SMALL FLOC
A ' 3. TURBID SUPERNATANT
°\ }
fc ( J 4. LOW SVI
<
-------
  in the mixed liquor, in mg/l, and is a measure of the
  amount of microorganisms available to degrade the
  waste, or of the strength and density of the mixture as
  it flows from the aeration tank to the clarification tank.
  This parameter is determined by filtration of a known
  volume of mixed liquor, and drying and weighing of
  the filter and solids. (Standard Method 209C).

  2.3.2 Sludge Volume Index (SVI).
  This value measures the settling characteristics of the
  floe  (sludge), and aids in  determining if any adjust-
  ments should be  made in operations.

  SVI is the volume (in ml) of one gram of sludge after
  30 minutes of settling. It is determined by taking one
  liter of mixed liquor from a  point near the outlet of the
  aeration tank, allowing the sample to settle for 30
  minutes in a graduated cylinder, and  performing the
  following computation:
  gyj _ volume (sludge) after 30 min. (ml/1) x 1000_ rn]
                     MLSS (mg/l)               ~~jf

  SVI is a measure of the settling characteristics of the
  sludge—a sludge with a low SVI will settle  and com-
  pact well. However, an SVI that is too low is indicative
  of pin floe. A high SVI is indicative of bulking.

  2.3.3 Sludge Age.
  This parameter measures the average number of days
  that solids remain in the system.
  Sludge Age is computed using known parameters:
         Vol. aer. tank (gal.) x MLSS (mg/l)
                                            - = days
Recycle flow rate (gal./day) x recycle MLSS {mg/l)

  A similar parameter. Sludge Retention Time, is com-
  puted by  determining the mass  of  microorganisms
  under aeration or reaeration in the system, and divid-
  ing that value by the mass of microorganisms released
  in the waste activated sludge and lost in the effluent.

  Sludge Age is important because it aids the operator in
  maintaining a  viable population  of  microorganisms.
  The common  range for Sludge Age in a conventional
  activated sludge plant is 3  to  15 days. Optimum
  Sludge Age can vary seasonally, as biological activity
  increases in summer and decreases in winter. Thus
  Sludge Age should generally be adjusted at least twice
  a year, raised in the winter and lowered in the summer.

  A Sludge Age that is too low can cause floe to be light
  and  fluffy, settling  slowly  or  escaping with  the
  effluent (a bulking condition). A high Sludge Age (too
  many solids in the system) can result in pin floe and a
  turbid effluent.
2.3.4 Dissolved Oxygen (DO).
This  parameter is a measure of the amount of dis-
solved oxygen present in the process tanks. A mini-
mum of  0.5 mg/l of DO should be maintained in the
aeration  tank. DO  must be carefully monitored and
controlled to ensure efficient operation. This monitor-
ing may  be accomplished  with  a portable oxygen
meter or by lab analysis of samples (the former is pre-
ferred because there is no delay in obtaining results).
Ideally monitoring takes place continuously  at several
points in the aeration tank.

2.3.5 Food/Microorganism Ratio (F/M).
This parameter indicates the ratio of food entering the
system to the mass of microorganisms being aerated.
It is computed as follows:
     _pounds per day of BOD added to aeration tank
               MLSS in aeration tank (Ibs)

The normal range for F/M for a conventional plant is
0.15  to 0.5.

2.4  Effect of Number of Filamentous
      Microorganisms on  Quantitative  Floe
      Parameters

SVI is the parameter most closely related to the number
of filamentous microorganisms in the floe. Pin floe (floe
with very few filamentous microorganisms) will have
an SVI below 70 ml/g, while bulking sludge  (with high
numbers of filamentous microorganisms) will have an
SVI above 150 ml/g.
Similarly,  filamentous  microorganisms  affect  the
amount of suspended  solids in the effluent. Sludge
having few such microorganisms and thus resulting in
pin floe will yield a turbid effluent, containing many
suspended solids. A bulking sludge with too_ many fila-
mentous microorganisms will result in a very clear ef-
fluent, but as the effluent flows from the clarification
tank it will carry the large, light floes,  increasing the
SS in the effluent.

-------
                                             Chapter 3
3.0 Activated Sludge Bulking
Sludge bulking is one of the most common operational
problems experienced by activated sludge treatment
plants.

3.1 Symptoms of Sludge Bulking
Sludge bulking has visible  symptoms as well  as  ef-
fects on the parameters used to assess the functions
of the activated sludge system.

3.1.1  Qualitative manifestations.
Sludge bulking occurs, when sludge in the clarification
tank gains in  volume and  becomes  light and  fluffy,
flowing out over the weirs  with the effluent. The ef-
fluent itself is otherwise very clear.

3.7.2  Quantitative manifestations.
The most conspicuous quantitative  symptom  of
sludge bulking is an  elevated Sludge Volume Index
(SVI).  Bulking sludge generally  has  an  SVI of over
150 ml/g.  The density of bulking  sludge is much
lower than that of "ideal" sludge, and therefore fewer
microorganisms are returned to the  aeration  tank in
the  return activated sludge (RAS).  This  interferes
drastically  with treatment  efficiency, because fewer
microorganisms are  present in the aeration tank to
digest organic matter.

3.2  Role of Filamentous Microorganisms in
      Sludge Bulking
As discussed in Section 2.2, filamentous microorgan-
isms play an  important role in the flocculation of acti-
vated sludge, forming a "macrostructure" to which
smaller bacteria can cling (see Figure 3). Without fila-
mentous microorganisms, pin floe can develop.

However,  if  there are too many filamentous  micro-
organisms, floe will be diffuse  and will settle  poorly,
resulting in bulking.

3.2.1  Relationship of filamentous microorganism
       count to bulking.
The several  methods of  expressing counts  of  fila-
mentous microorganisms are discussed in Appendix
1. In general,  a filamentous microorganism count that
exceeds  a  known standard, generated through experi-
mentation and observation, will result in a high  SVI
and a bulking condition in the sludge (see Figure 4).
Different filamentous microorganisms (and  mixes of
such organisms as occur in activated sludge) do differ
in the number of such organisms necessary to impart
a bulking condition to the sludge.

3.2.2 Relationship of specific filamentous
      microorganisms to bulking.
Researchers have  developed correlations  between
bulking  and various specific filamentous microorgan-
isms.  Further, they  have shown that different micro-
organisms that can cause bulking flourish when differ-
ent operating  problems are present. These correla-
tions are summarized in Table 2. The research that re-
sulted in this table  gathered data on plant operating
conditions only incidentally;-it was focused on deter-
mining  the  presence of   various  microorganisms in
bulking sludge. However, the table can be used to de-
termine  probable operational causes of bulking, if the
dominant microorganisms  in  the  bulking sludge are
identified. (See Appendix 2 for a guide to microscopic
identification of filamentous microorganisms.)


3.3 Factors Affecting the Presence of
     Filamentous Microorganisms

As  Table 2 shows,  changes in plant operating condi-
tions,  and  resultant changes  in  the quantitative
parameters defined  in Section 2.3, can promote the
growth  of different filamentous microorganisms.

A low pH in the aeration tank can promote the growth
of. fungi. Based  on laboratory experiments, the best
activated sludge performance can  be obtained at pH
values from 7.0  to 7.5, although removals of oxygen
consumed, suspended  solids,  and bacteria are  good
at pH values ranging from  6.0 to 9.0. The presence of
fungi  indicates that the wastewater most likely con-
tains strong acid discharges and an aeration tank pH
value below 6.0.

Low DO in the aeration tank can promote the growth of
S. natans and type 1701. Low DO concentration in low
F/M systems can promote the growth of H.  hydrossis.
Experiments have shown that the DO concentration re-
quired to prevent the growth of low DO filamentous

-------
 FifluroS. Effect of filamentous microorganisms on floe structure: a. aggregates observed for a pure culture of an activated sludge floe
         former; b. aggregates observed for a dual culture of a single floe former and a single filamentous microorganism (100x phase
         contrast; bar= 100 pm) (Lau at a/., 1984).
                                                                              * If''" ' Jt  *   •**
                                                                       •?>* • .j'?.?,x. i '*'" M-*^ v
swas^w>5ss
                                            -	,	~.  --       ••
                                                                                  :./;
                                                          '

                                                            '

                BB**1'«*<(I7*****T*'"1T*"   	"T**^**1** *        *   "
Roforcnco: Jenkins of al.
                                                      10

-------
Figure 4.  Correlation of filament count and SVI for secondary (first stage) and tertiary (second stage) activated sludge systems at the San
         Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant, CA (Beebe et al, 1982).
        140
        120
        100
     E
     >
                                                                                                                   100
                                             FILAMENT COUNT
                                                             11

-------
 Table 2. Dominant Filament Types as Indicators of Conditions Causing Activated Sludge Bulking
 Suggested Causative Conditions
  Indicative Filament Types
 Low
 DO

 Low
 F/M
 Septic
 Wastewater/Sulfide

 Nutrient
 Deficiency
 Low
 PH
  type 1701, S. natans, H. hydrossis
  M. parvicella, H. hydrossis, Nocardia sp
  types 021N, 0041, 0675, 0092, 0581, 0961,
  0803
  Thiothrix sp., Beggiatoa and type 021 l\l
  Thiothrix sp., S. natans, type 021N, and possibly
  H. hydrossis and types 0041 and 0675
  fungi
 Richard eta/. 1982a; Strom and Jenkins 1984.
 microorganisms was a function of the F/M load.  The
 greater the F/M load, the greater the DO concentration
 required to prevent the low DO bulking.

 Experiments have also  shown that  low DO  bulking
 can be caused and cured by manipulation of F/M load
 and DO concentrations. However, in dealing with  low
 DO  bulking  problems,  a  basic  economic  question
 must be addressed.  To cure the problem, one must
 lower the F/M or increase the aeration tank DO con-
 centration. Each of these actions may have  undesir-
 able consequences. Lowering the F/M may cause the
 onset  of  nitrification and  increase  MLSS levels to
 values that  exceed the  solids capacity of the secon-
 dary clarifiers. Increasing the aeration tank  DO con-
 centration will require greater power input and may
 also cause the onset of  nitrification. Because of these
 factors, "rt is necessary  to consider the alternative of
 operating at a low  aeration tank DO concentration  and
 killing  off  the  filamentous  microorganisms  that
 develop using RAS chlorination.  RAS chlorination is
 discussed in Section 3.4.4.1.

 Low F/M  load may result in  M. parvicella and types
 0041,  0675, 0581,  0961,  0803,  and 0092. The
 specific  causes  for the  growth  of  filamentous
 microorganisms  that appear in  continuously  fed,
 completely-mixed,  low  F/M   load  activated  sludge
 systems are  poorly understood. These systems pro-
 duce poorer  settling activated sludge than  systems
that are  fed  intermittently or have aeration  tanks
 where there is a relatively high local  concentration of
wastewater at the point where the RAS and influent
enter the tank. Emperical measures producing a car-
bonaceous substrate concentration  gradient  in  the
aeration tank, or a high substrate concentration at the
point where RAS and influent enter the aeration tank
have consistently controlled low F/M induced bulking
in laboratory  studies, but less effectively in practice.
The correlation of cause and effect between low F/M
load and the  presence of filamentous microorganisms
is not completely understood  and is  being studied
further.

Treatment of septic  waste can  lead  to  growth  of
Thiothrix spp. and type 021N. This may result from
the  ability of these  microorganisms to grow  on in-
organic reduced sulfur compounds and organic acids,
which are   produced  by  fermentation   in  septic
sewage.  Under such conditions these  microorgan-
isms  produce  intracellular sulfur granules  that  are
convenient for identification purposes.

Treatment of nutrient-deficient  wastes   (low  in
nitrogen  or  phosphorus)  can lead  to growth  of
Thiothrix spp.  and  type 021N, and  possibly types
0041  and 0675. Under these conditions,  Thiothrix
spp. and  type 021N do not contain intracellular sulfur
granules, but may contain other intracellular granules
such  as  polyhydroxybutyrate  (PHB).  Also  under
nutrient-deficient conditions, types 00,41 /and 0675
may  show  a IMeisser-positive  extracellular   slime
covering,   although   they   normally  slain Neisser
negative (see  Appendix 1 for stain procedures).
                                                  12

-------
When  microscopic  examination  suggests  nutrient
deficiency, the BOD, COD, or TOG to nitrogen and
phosphorus ratio of the influent should  be checked.
Generally,  sufficient nutrients are present when the
influent to be  treated  by  activated sludge  contains
BOD5/N/P in the ratio of 100/5/1. If necessary, the re-
quired  nutrients should be  added. Long  sludge age
systems  can  treat  wastes  with less  nitrogen and
phosphorus than indicated  by this ratio  because of
the recycling of nutrients by the endogenous decay of
activated sludge in these systems.

While  the  BOD5/N/P ratio  is a  useful guideline  for
detecting nutrient deficient wastes, the following fac-
tors also should be taken into account:

• The  availability of nitrogen and phosphorus  in the
  influent should be high enough for use during the
  metabolism of the carbon  source.

• The  nutrient supply  should  be paced  so  that
  nutrients never run out in any part of the aeration
  tank as  a result of shock from  influent carbon
  loads.

• Because each wastewater/activated  sludge  com-
  bination  has  its  own unique  nutrient demand, an
  influent  BODS/N/P  ratio  should -be  checked by
  measurements   of   effluent  concentrations  of
  dissolved (0.45 m/t  filtered)  orthophosphate, am-
  monia, and nitrate.

• Ammonia and  nitrate  are  available   as  nitrogen
  sources  for  activated  sludge  growth.. Ammonia
  added  in nitrifying systems for nutrient supplema-
  tion  will be  converted to  nitrate and still remain
  available as a nitrogen source.

A Sludge Age  that is too low can result in "straggler
floe,"  light buoyant particles that do not  settle  in the
clarification tank and flow over the weirs in an  other-
wise clear effluent.

3.4  Control  of Activated Sludge Bulking

Maintenance   of   optimum  levels  of  filamentous
microorganisms in  activated  sludge is necessary to
ensure efficient settling.  Although proper treatment
plant design is the best means of preventing the ex-
cessive growth of  filamentous  microorganisms that
cause  bulking, some design innovations  are very re-
cent,  and  many existing activated sludge plants do
not have them. In such plants, bulking sludge must be.
corrected by adjustments in operations  or by addition
of chemicals.

3.4.7  General  approach to controlling filamentous
microorganisms.
A .good general approach to controlling  bulking prob-
lems  is  as follows: First,  identify the  filamentous
microorganisms causing the bulking (for identification
procedures,  see Appendices 1 and 2). Second, using
the information in Table 2  and familiarity with condi-
tions at the  plant in question, determine the probable
cause of bulking.  Third, determine whether the under-
lying problem  can be immediately rectified by opera-
tional  changes  (such  as  prechlorination  of septic
waste, addition of missing nutrients,  or other adjust-
ment of  parameters). Fourth, determine whether the
plant  requires major  design or  operational changes
that might take a long time to  implement (such as
changes  in aeration capacity or unit configuration). If
the plant does require such  changes, sludge settling
will  not  immediately  become  normal when  those
changes   are  made,  but  will  improve  only  slowly
because  sludge remains in the system for an extended
period of time (it could take as long as three times the
Sludge Retention  Time for settling to become normal).
Because of  the delays associated with major design
and  operational  changes,  methods  are  needed  for
rapid  correction  of the problem  while such changes
take effect.  These methods include process manipula-
tion,  addition  of  chemicals to enhance settling,  and
addition  of  toxicants  to selectively  kill  filamentous
microorganisms.

3.4.2 Process manipulation to control bulking.
In many cases, the adverse effects of bulking sludge
can  be minimized by proper management of the  ac-
tivated sludge system, particularly if it is underloaded
or  if certain  process  options  were built into  the
original design.  To use these process management
tools to deal with bulking sludge, it is necessary to:

• Study  in detail  the  technical operating principles of
  the activated  sludge clarification tank,  particularly
  as they relate to the thickening function;

• Examine  specific  techniques  for  determining   the
  solids  handling  capacity of the  clarification tank and
  how this  is  influenced  by sludge  settling charac-
  teristics; and

• Review techniques of clarification and aeration tank
  operation,  in order  to maximize  clarification tank
  capacity in systems with bulking sludge.

3.4.2.1  Design Calculations for Process
Modifications
Bulk  sludge problems can  often be corrected  by
changes  in  design parameters. This  section reviews
system  operations from a  quantitative perspective,
and demonstrates calculations for changes in design.

Clarifier  Operation   Principles.  Activated  sludge
clarification  tanks   have  two  basic   functions—
clarification  and  thickening.  Clarification  is   the
removal of  activated sludge floes to produce a clear
overflow that either  meets  discharge standards  or

-------
 does not overload downstream processes. Thickening
 of the settled  activated sludge solids (i.e., RAS) is
 required so that they can be returned to  the aeration
 basin. If the activated sludge solids are not thickened
 and removed from the clarification tank at a rate faster
 than they are added, they will accumulate  until the
 clarification tank is full  and the excess solids  will be
 discharged into the effluent. Since bulking affects the
 ability of the activated  sludge solids  to thicken, the
 thickening function and thickening capacity of the  clari-
 fication tank are affected by sludge bulking.
Process Schematic and Definitions. Figure 5 is a proc-
ess  schematic of the  activated sludge system. The
aeration tank has  a volume V, and  the  clarification
tank has a surface  area  A. Wastewater  enters the
aeration tank at flowrate Q, together with  RAS,  at
flowrate Q,. The aeration  tank  suspended  solids con-
centration (MLSS)  is X, and the RAS, SS is Xu. Ac-
tivated sludge soilds are  applied to  the  clarification
tank at a flowrate of Q +  Qr.

It is assumed here that sludge is wasted from the RAS
at a flowrate Qw, at the same SS concentration as the
RAS, Xu. Effluent is discharged from the  clarification
tank at a flowrate of Q—Qw/ and it contains  an SS
concentration of X0.

Process Operating Relationships. In developing rela-
tionships  to describe the  clarification tank thickening
function,  certain  simplifying   assumptions  can  be
made. First, the  WAS flowrate (QJ  is usually small
compared to the influent flowrate  (Q), and its effect
on effluent  flow can be neglected.  Second, the quan-
tities of activated  sludge solids discharged in WAS
and  in the effluent are small  compared to the quantity
of sludge solids  applied to  and withdrawn from the
clarification  tank.

Using these assumptions and assuming that solids are
not accumulating in the clarification tank,  a simplified
solids mass balance over the clarification tank is:
{Q + Q,)X = QrXu
(1)
Equation  1  states that,  at steady-state, the rate at
which solids are applied to the clarification tank must
be equal to the rate at which they are removed. Equa-
tion  1 can be  used to develop the following relation-
ships that are  useful  for assessing clarification tank
operation.
1. Degree of Thickening that can be Achieved by a
Clarification Tank
   = (Q + Q,)
(2)
x
       2. Calculation of Required RAS Flowrate

       Qr =    Qx
             (X..-X)
                                                 (3)
       This relationship  can be  used to calculate the  RAS
       flowrate required  for a specified influent flowrate, the
       current  aeration  tank MLSS  concentration,  and an
       RAS SS concentration that it is believed  (perhaps bas-
       ed on past history) can be achieved in the clarification
       tank.
       3. Clarifier Capacity Calculation

       Q  = Qr(Xu-X)

                X
                                                (4)
This relationship illustrates that the degree of thicken-
ing is a function of the influent and RAS flowrates.
This relationship can be used to calculate the capacity
of a clarification tank for a specified RAS flowrate and
an  aeration  tank  MLSS concentration, and for an
achieveable  RAS/SS  concentration.  Equations  1-4
assume  that  sufficient  clarification  tank  area  is
available to thicken the RAS to a concentration of Xu.
Techniques for  determining the clarification tank  area
required to achieve this are discussed in the following
section.

Sludge Thickening  Theory.  Thickening  of  activated
sludge solids in a clarification  tank  occurs by gravity
settling.  As the solids settle,  their concentration in-
creases from the MLSS concentration (X) to the RAS
concentration (Xu). Because  of their flocculent nature
and  concentration, activated sludge particles do not
settle individually,  but as an entire mass. The solids
settle at a constant rate until they begin to "pile  up"
at the bottom of the container in which they are settl-
ing. The initial settling velocity of the activated sludge
solids (V.) decreases as the initial SS concentration in-
creases.  This type of behavior is called  zone settling,
or type III settling.

Zone settling is familiar to anyone who has run an SVI
test.  The  entire  mass  of  activated sludge  settles
together,  producing a well-defined interface between
the top of the settling sludge  and the clear superna-
tant.  When  the  height of  the interface is  plotted
against time,  the  line initially is  straight  but  later
begins to level off (Figure 6).  The slope of the initial
straight line is the initial settling velocity, V, . Sludges
with  higher  initial SS concentrations  settle  slower
than  those  with  lower  initial  SS  concentrations
(Figure 6).

Clarification tank thickening capacity is related to the
tank's ability to accept the applied solids load and to
convey all the  solids  to  the underflow. This is ac-
complished  in  two ways: settling  of the activated
sludge solids  and  withdrawal  of RAS  by pumping.
RAS withdrawal causes a general flow of fluid to the
bottom of the tank, and  this general flow also carries
                                                    14

-------
Figure 5.  Activated Sludge Process Schematic.
                           o>
                          X
             Q u.
             ZE
             O <
             o 3
             Ul O
                             UJ
                             3

                             u.
                             LL
                             111
                       i!
                       F OC
                                               <
                                               cc
                                               UJ
                                               o
                                                                       ui
                                                                       O
                                                                       Z
                                                                       o
                                                                       o
                                                                         uj O
                                                                         o co
                                             CO CO

                                             9 a
                                             -I Ul
                                             OQ
                                           5 co z

                                           •9 O
                                                                       CO

                          X

                          o

                          6
               CD

               O

               •S
               OC
               Ul
 OC
 o

 O
 Q
 111
>

x"
 Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                            X
                     < CO O S2
                     OC < Z ;«
                     503 Ul"

                     SgSiZ
                     —i O 3 ui


                     < < co nl

                     ^SoUfa
                     11 •*  II  II
                      * "  3 01
                     o x x x
Ul
o
Q
                                                 o o
                                             15

-------
Figure 6. Zone Settling of Activated Sludge Solids.
                                                        HIGHER INITIAL CONCENTRATION
                                                      LOWER INITIAL CONCENTRATION
                                           TIME
Reference: Jenkins, etal., 1984.
                                                16

-------
the settling  activated  sludge  solids  to  the bottom
where they can be removed.

The various techniques that have been developed to
determine  the  thickening  capacity  of clarification
tanks generally compare the rate at which  activated
sludge solids are applied to the rate  at which they are
conveyed to the bottom  of the  tank by settling and
bulk withdrawal. As long  as the  application  rate is no
greater than  the settling and withdrawal  rate, the ap-
plied solids will be conveyed to the bottom of the tank
and removed (i.e., thickening failure will not occur). If
the  solids application  rate  is greater,  then  excess
solids will accumulate  in  the tank until  it is full and
solids will overflow into the effluent.

Techniques  for clarification tank thickening analysis
are relatively complex. They account for SS concen-
tration increases in the clarification tank during settl-
ing and the effects of this on the rate at which solids
are conveyed to the bottom of the tank by both settl-
ing  and  bulk  withdrawal.  These  techniques are
discussed thoroughly in the literature (Keinath  et al.,
1977);, they will not be discussed in .detail here.

The thickening capacity of a clarification tank, can be
stated in terms of  an allowable  applied solids loading
rate (Ga), which is  the mass of solids applied per unit
of clarification  tank surface area.

Using the  definitions  presented earlier, the  actual
solids loading rate is:
 Ga = X(Q + Qr)/A
(5)
 Comparison of the actual solids loading rate with the
 allowable  rate will  indicate whether the clarification
 tank is overloaded  and  whether  it will  experience
 thickening failure.

 The  allowable  solids loading  rate  is a.- function  of
 several factors including the RAS flowrate per unit of
 clarification  tank surface  area (Qr/A) and the settling
 characteristics of the sludge.  By varying these fac-
 tors, it may be possible  to increase the capacity of the
 clarification  tank  and/or  of  the   activated  sludge
 system.

 Clarification   Tank  Thickening  Capacity.  This
 parameter can be determined by direct measurement
 or  by calculation  using  the techniques  discussed
 above.

 Direct measurement of  thickening  capacity is ac-
 complished  by  manipulating  the  clarification  tank
 solids  loading until  thickening failure occurs. For ex-
 ample, the  clarification tank influent flowrate can be
 increased while the  RAS flowrate is maintained cons-
 tant.  The  clarification  tank  sludge blanket depth  is
 monitored and the point at which it begins to increase
corresponds to the point at which thickening failure is
just  beginning to occur. The applied solids  loading
rate  under these conditions is calculated. This is the
allowable solids loading rate for the selected RAS rate
and  the observed sludge  settling characteristics.  By
repeating this  procedure at different RAS rates and
with sludges  of different settling characteristics, the
clarification tank thickening capacity can be  estab-
lished for a variety of conditions.

While this technique has been used in  practice, it is
rather cumbersome  and time-consuming,  and the ef-
fluent   quality  may  be  degraded   during  testing.
Moreover, bulking sludge  must be available to allow
clarification tank capacity to be measured for bulking
conditions. The major advantage  of this  method is
that the determination of allowable thickening capaci-
ty is direct and no assumptions are required to trans-
late  the results to full-scale plant performance.

Calculation  techniques  for   determining  allowable
clarification  tank  thickening  capacity  require  the
measurement  of sludge  settling characteristics. The
relationship between SS concentration  and the initial
settling velocity must be  established either by  direct
measurement or by using correlations between  an in-
dex  of  sludge settleability  and the SS concentration/
initial   settling  velocity  relationship  developed  by
others.  Correlations have  been developed using in-
dices such as the  standard SVI, the stirred SVI con-
ducted  at MLSS =  3.0 g/l, and DSVI.

Direct  measurement  of the  SS concentration/initial
settling velocity  relationship  can  be quite  cumber-
some  and time-consuming.  Initial  settling velocities
must be  measured  for sludges with various initial SS
concentrations obtained  by   mixing  various  propor-
tions of  mixed liquor,  RAS,  and  effluent. Measure-
ments  must be made in settling columns, that  are at
least 0.15 m  (6 in.) diameter, 1.8  m (6 ft.) tall,  and
equipped  with a stirring device. Bulking sludge must
be available before its thickening  characteristics  can
be measured.

Figure  7  presents  the  results of  a correlation tech-
nique  and analysis developed by  Daigger! and  Roper
 (1984) in which the allowable solids loading rate (Ga)
is plotted as  a function of the RAS  SS concentration
for  sludges with  SVI  in  the range 50 — 350 ml/g.
 Dashed lines  that  correspond 'to various underflow
•'rates (Qr/A) also are plotted. This correlation is based
 on a broad data base and should be readily useable by
 plant operators because it uses the  standard  SVI as
 the  index of  sludge settleability. To use this diagram,
 the   point that  corresponds to   clarification  tank
 operating conditions is located in the diagram. Two of
 the  following pieces of  information  are needed to
 locate  this point:
                                                     77

-------
Figure 7.  Clarification Tank Design and Operation Diagram (after Daigger and Roper (1984)).
    I  I   I  I  I   I  I   I   I  I   I  I   I   I  I   I  I   I   I  I   I  I   I   I .I   I  I   I  I   I   I  I   I  I   I   I  I   I
                                       U?           «»           CO           
-------
 • The actual solids loading rate;
 • The underflow rate; and
 • The RAS SS concentration.

 The third piece of information can be used as a check.
 When the  point  plots  below  the  allowable  solids
 loading  line  of  interest,  the  clarification  tank  is
 operating below its allowable thickening capacity and
 should not be subject to thickening failure. When the
 point falls directly on the allowable solids loading line
 of  interest,  the clarification tank'is  operating at the
 failure  point.  When  the  point plots  above  the
 allowable solids loading, thickening failure  will occur.
 An example of the use  of this  diagram is presented
 later in this section.

 Clarifier  Analysis and Operation.  The  first steps  in
 clarification tank analysis often are to use the relation-
 ships in  Equations 1-4.  For example,  sludge bulking
 generally will cause a decrease in the RAS SS concen-
 tration.  Equation 1  predicts that a decrease in the
 RAS  SS concentration  (Xu)  requires an  increase  in
 RAS  flowrate. This increase is  necessary to ensure
 that sludge applied to the clarification tank is removed
 in the RAS.

 For example, consider an activated sludge system that
 operates at an influent flow of 1.0 MGD (0.044 m3/sec)
 and an RAS flow of 0.33 MGD (0.014 rrWsec). The
 MLSS concentration is 3000 mg/l, and the RAS SS
 concentration is 12,000 mg/l. As a check, calculate the
 required  RAS flowrate using Equation  1.


Qr =  QX/(X-X) = (1.0 MGD) (3,000)/( 12,000-3,000)
                   = 0.33 MGD (0.0143/sec)

 This  agrees  with  the  actual   RAS  flowrate.  Now
 assume  that the sludge settleability deteriorates and
 that the clarifier sludge blanket begins to increase.
 The RAS SS  concentration is  found  to  be 8,000
 mg/1. Equation 1  indicates that the  RAS flowrate
 must be:

 Qr  = QX/(XU-X) = (1.0 MGD) (3,000)/(8,000-3,000)
                   =  0.60 MGD (0.026m3/sec) ,

 Thus,  for  these  conditions , increasing  the  RAS  •
 flowrate to  0.60 MGD  should  prevent  clarification
 tank failure.                              ,  •

 The  use of  Equations  1-4 to develop  alternative
 clarification  tank operating strategies must be accom-
 panied by an analysis  of clarification tank thickening
 capacity. In this manual, the correlation method  (with
 SVI) of Daigger and Roper (1984) will be used; as in-
 dicated  previously, other somewhat less convenient
 techniques are available.
Assume that the clarification tank in the example
discussed above is 45 feet (13.7m) in diameter and
has a surface area of 1,590 ft2 (148 m2). From Equa-
tion 5, the applied  solids loading rate for the intitial
operating condition is:

                  Ga = X(Q + Qr)/A
   = (3,000 mg/l)(1.0 + 0.33)MGD{8.34)/1,590 ft2
 ,   '      = 20.9 Ib/ft2-day (102 kg/m2 day)

This condition plots  as point  number  1  in Figure  41
and indicates that the clarification tank could operate
successfully  with a  sludge having an SVI  of up to
150 ml/g.

For the second operating condition (RAS, SS = 8,000
mg/l, RAS flowrate   =  0.6 MGD) the applied solids
loading rate is:

    (3,000 mg/l)(1.0 + 0.6)MGD(8.34)/1,590 ft2
          = 25.2 Ib/ft2-day (123 kg/m2 .day)

This condition plots  as point  number 2  in Figure  41
and indicates that  the  clarification  tank now  can
operate successfully with a sludge having an SVI just
over 200 ml/g.

Now-assume that the maximum RAS pumping capac-
ity is ,0.95 MGD (0.042 m3/sec). At the maximum
RAS  flowrate,  the   bulk  withdrawal  rate is  0.95
MGD/1,590 ft2  or 597 gpd/ft2 (24.3 m/day) and the
applied solids loading  rate is:

  ,  (3,000 mg/l)(1.0 + 0.95(MGD(8.34)/1,590 ft2
          = 30.7 Ib/ft2-day (150 kg/m2-day)

This condition plots  as point number 3 on Figure  41
and indicates that  the  clarification  tank could  be
operated successfully with a sludge having an SVI of
about  250 ml/g and that the RAS SS concentration
would be about  6,300 mg/l.

Now assume that the RAS flowrate is maintained at
0.95 MGD (0.042 m3/sec) (equivalent  to a bulk with-
drawal rate of 597 gpd/ft2) (24.3 m/day) but that the
SVI will be controlled to a value of no more than 150
,ml/g by RAS chlorination. Moving along the operating
line (for 597 gpd/ft2) to point  number 4 indicates that
the clarification  tank could be  operated  at a .solids
loading rate of up to 42.8 Ib/ft2-day (209 kg/m2-day)
'and with an RAS SS concentration of up to 8,700
mg/l at this loading.
                                                   19

-------
 Equation  5 can  be arranged to calculate  for these
 conditions:

 a.  The maximum allowable influent  flow rate  at
    MLSS = 3000mg/l

                   Q = (G«A/X)-ar

    = (43.5 Ib/ft2-day(1,590 ft2)/(3,000 mg/l)(8.34))
        -0.95 MGD

    = 1.8MGD(0.79m3/sec)

 b.  The maximum allowable MLSS at an influent flow
    of 1.0 MGD (0.079 m3/sec.)

                   X = (G8A)/(Q + Qr)

    = (43.5 Ib/ft2-day)(1,590 ft2)
        -M1.0 + 0.95)MGD(8.34)

    = 4,250 mg/l
 These examples  illustrate how the general  principles
 of  clarification tank analysis can be used to optimize
 the existing activated sludge clarification tank opera-
 tion.

 System  Analysis  and  Operation.  In  addition  to
 manipulation of RAS flowrates, the effects of bulking
 sludge can be ameliorated by reducing MLSS concen-,
 tration in the clarification tank feed. This reduces the
 applied solids loading rate to the  clarification  tank
 (Equation  5). Reducing applied  solids  loading  rate
 while maintaining the same  RAS bulk withdrawal  rate
 (i.e., move downward and  to the left along an RAS
 bulk withdrawal operating  line in Figure 8)  increases
 the allowable SVI.

 MLSS  concentration in the.clarification tank feed  can
 be  reduced by reducing the mixed liquor solids inven-
 tory and by changing the activated sludge  operating
 mode. Mixed  liquor solids  inventory can be reduced
 by  increasing the sludge wasting rate.  This may not
 be  feasible if sludge handling capacity is not available
 or if reducing the mixed liquor solids inventory would
 lead to an unfavorable F/M (e.g., a low F/M may be re-
 quired to achieve nitrification).

 The objective of  changing  operational mode to com-
 bat sludge bulking is to reduce MLSS concentration in
 the clarification tank feed without reducing the rhixed '
 liquor solids inventory. The step feed (step  aeration)
 and contact stabilization configurations are particular-
 ly useful in this regard. Needless to say,  they can only
 be  employed to (combat bulking sludge if the plant is
designed with the flexibility to operate  in these con-
figurations. Both  operating  configurations allow  the
operation  of  part of  the  aeration  tank ,at  a higher
MLSS concentration (for a given F/M) than would be
acheived were the aeration tank completely mixed.
 The use of step feed to lower the solids loading ap-
 plied to the clarification tank is  illustrated using the
 previous example. In addition to an influent  flowrate';
 (Q)  of 1.0 MGD (0.044 m3/sec), an RAS flowrate of
 (Qr) of 0.33 MGD (0.014  m3/sec), an MLSS concen-
 tration (X) of 3,000 mg/l,  an RAS concentration (Xu);
 of   12,000  mg/l,  and  a  clarification tank  solids
 loading rate  of 20.9  Ib/ft2/day (102 kg/m2/day), it  is;
 assumed that the aeration  tank has a total volume of •
 0.25 MG  (3780 m3) and  that it can  be operated  in
 either the  plug  flow  (conventional)  or the two-pass
 step feed mode  (Figure 9).

 Point number  1 in  Figure 10  indicates that  these
 operating conditions are acceptable  when the SVI  is
 less than 1 50 ml/g.

 When the operating  mode is changed  to two-pass
 step feed at the same influent and RAS flow  rates, all
 of the RAS but only one-half of the,influent flbw is ad-
 ded to the  first pass. The remainder  of the influent
 flow is added to the  second  pass. A redistribution, of
 mixed liquor  solids  inventory  occurs  so  that  it  is.
 higher in the first pass than in the second pass. This
 arises because less dilution of the RAS by influent oc-
 curs in the first pass  than  in the second pass.  If ,the'
 total mixed liquor inventory is maintained the  same as
 in the plug flow mode, then  the MLSS concentration
 in the second pass will be less than when the system
 was operated in the plug flow mode.	-''-''''['

 The MLSS concentrations in  each of the two passes
 can  be calculated for step feed by writing solids mass
 balances for each pass. These equations then  are sub-
stituted into an equation for the total solids inventory,
 which is solved  for the solids concentrations in  each
 pass and in the RAS. For  our example, the  aeration
 tank MLSS inventory in the plug flow mode is:

 Aeration Tank Inventory =  (3,000 mg/l),
                          (0.25 MG)(8.34): ./

                       =  6255 Ib (2840 kg)-

 This inventory will be  maintained in the two-pass step
 feed mode.                            '  ... ..

 The  solids mass  balance for the point at which; the in-
 fluent flow to the first pass (0.5 MGD) is mixed with
the RAS flow (0.33 MGD) is:         • -;   ' ;

 (0.33 MGD)  (Xu) =  (0.5  +  0.33 MGDHX,)
 and
              X, =  (0.33/0.833)XU =
                    0.4 X,,                     (6)
                                                  20

-------
Figure 8. Clarification Tank Thickening Analysis Example

        (after Daigger and Roper (1984)).
                                                                                                          3

                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                          cc
                                                                                                          H

                                                                                                          UJ
                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                          z
                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                          o
                                                                                                          a
                                                                                                          LU
                                                                                                          O
                                                                                                          z
                                                                                                          Ul
                                                                                                          Q.
                                                                                                          V)
                                                                                                          (O
                                                                                                          <
                                                                                                          cc
o '
                                                  ONiavon sanos

-------
  Figure 9. Step Feed Operation Example Schematic
         (After Daigger and Roper (1984)).
    1.0 MGD
                               X = 3000 mg/l
                                                                     SLR = 20.9 Ib/ft2-day
                               1.33 MGD, 3000 mg/l
                                0.33 MGD,XU = 12,000 mg/l
                                PLUG FLOW (CONVENTIONAL) MODE
1.0 MGD
0.5 MGD
                             0.5 MGD
                            X1 = 3690 mg/l  .
                            X2 = 2310 mg/l
                                                                     SLR = 16.1 Ib/ftz-day
                               1.33 MGD, 2310 mg/l
                            0.33 MGD, Xu = 9230 mg/l
                                        STEP FEED MODE
                                                  22

-------
Figure 10. Step Feed Operation Example Plot of Parameters (after Daigger and Roper (1984)).
                                                                                                            3
                                                                                                             3
                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                            DC

                                                                                                            z
                                                                                                            111
                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                            z
                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                            CO
                                                                                                            a

                                                                                                            o
                                                                                                            CO
                                                                                                            Q
                                                                                                            111
                                                                                                            O
                                                                                                            z
                                                                                                            UJ
                                                                                                            Q.
                                                                                                            CO

                                                                                                            CO
                                                                                                            CO
                                       (Aep-zu/qi) O '3JLVU ONIOVOH SQIIOS
                                                       23

-------
The solids mass  balance for the point at which  the
flow from the first pass (0.83 MGD) mixes with the in-
fluent flow to the second pass (0.5 MGD) is:
       (0.83 MGDHX,} = (0.83 + 0.5 MGD)(X2
and
                                               (7)
         X2 = (0.83/1 .33)X, = 0.625X,

Combining Equations 6 and 7 gives:

     X2 = 0.625X, = 0.625(0.4XU) = 0.25XU      (8)

The total aeration tank  mixed liquor solids inventory
can be expressed as a function of Xu as follows, re-
membering that the volume of each aeration tank pass
is 0.25 MG/2 or 0.1 25 MG (1890m3):

Aeration Tank Solids  Inventory =

       (X,)(0.1 25 MGK8.34) + (X2)(0.1 25 MGH8.34)
               = 1.0425(X, + X2)               (9)
Substituting for X, and X2 from Equations  6 and 8
gives:

Aeration Tank Solids Inventory =
                           1.0425(0.4XU + 0.25XU)

                    = 0.6776XU

Setting this equal to the total solids inventory of 6255
Ib gives:
                6255lb = 0.6776X,,
and
                 Xu = 9,230 mg/l

X] can be calculated using Equation 6:

    X, = 0.4XU = (0.25)(9,230 mg/l) = 3,690 mg/l

and X2 can be calculated using Equation 8:

   X2 = 0.25XU= (0.25)(9,230 mg/l) = 2,210 mg/l

The clarification tank solids loading rate for this oper-
ating condition would be:

G, = (2,310mg/l)(1.33MGD)(8.34/1,590ft2
   = 16.1 Ib/ft2-day (78.6 kg/m2-day) (see Figure 10)

The benefits of two-pass step feed operation in allow-
ing an activated sludge system to operate success-
fully with a poor settling sludge are illustrated in Figure
10 using the data from the previously calculated ex-
amples. Points numbers 1 through 3 are for plug flow
operation with HAS  flowrates of 0.33, 0.6, and 0.95
MGD  (0.01, 0.026, and 0.04  m3/sec),  respectively.
Point number 4 is for two-pass step feed operation at
 an RAS flowrate of 0.33 MGD (0.01 m3/sec), as cal-
 culated above. These operating points show that  a
 sludge with an SVI of approximately 220-230  ml/g
 requires an RAS flowrate of 0.95 MGD when the aera-
 tion tank is plug flow and  0.33 MGD  (0.01  nWsec)
 when the aeration tank is two-pass step feed. This re-
 sults both in  lower RAS  pumping  costs  and higher
 RAS, SS concentration (9230 mg/l  vs. 6300 mg/l) —
 which may reduce  waste sludge processing and dis-
 posal costs.

 This example illustrates the  advantage of two-pass
 step feed over plug flow operation for dealing  with
 bulking sludge. Operation in  other  step feed  modes
.(such as three- or four-pass), contact stabilization,  or
 step feed with RAS reaeration (a combination of step
 feed  and contact stabilization)  offer  similar  advan-
 tages. Indeed,  any  change which results in  less dilu-
 tion of RAS by influent wastewater will allow storage
 of activated sludge solids in  the aeration tank and  a
 decrease in the MLSS concentration in the clarifica-
 tion tank feed. For example, if the system  depicted in
 Figure 42 had been placed  in the contact stabilization
 mode, using the first  pass for sludge stabilization and
 the  second pass for  contact (while maintaining the
 same mixed  liquor  solids  and inventory),  the MLSS
 concentration in the clarification tank feed would have
 been reduced to 1,200 mg/l and the clarification tank
 solids loading  rate would be  3.4 Ib/ft2/day
 (41 kg/m2/day).

 These  examples  have  illustrated  calculation  pro-
 cedures  for  determining   the operating  conditions
 when  the  mode  of operation  is changed.  In some
 cases  a  simplified   calculation procedure  can  be
 developed  for  a  particular system operating under
 defined operating conditions,  or  operating diagrams
 can be developed for  a particular system. Alternative-
 ly, these concepts can be used in a plant by changing
 plant operation and  observing the results. The general
 principle that changes resulting in less dilution of RAS
 by influent wastewater will decrease the MLSS con-
 centration of the clarification tank feed can be used to
 guide  changes  in  operating  mode.   After  making
 changes, their  impacts on solids distribution  in the
 system can be monitored. In most cases redistribution
 of the solids takes less than 1 day, so that the results
 can be determined in a timely manner.  The  resulting
 clarification tank solids loadings can then be deter-
 mined and the need for further changes assessed.

 3.4.3  Addition of chemicals to enhance settling.
 The  intent of this technique is to improve settling of
 sludge without destroying the filamentous  microorga-
 nisms. Synthetic polymers,  added to the mixed liquor
 as it leaves the aeration tank or to the clarification tank
 entry point, aid in settling of diffuse filamentous floe.
 The polymer used is usually a high molecular weight,
 cationic charge polymer, and may be applied alone or
                                                  24

-------
Table 3. Bulking Filamentous Microorganisms That Have Been
Successfully Controlled by Chlorination
Location
City of Albany, GA
Malibu Mesa, CA
City of Los Angeles
Terminal Island, CA
Carrousel Pilot Plant
Brewery Waste
City of Pacifica, CA
-City of San Jose, CA
Derry Township Municipal
Authority, Hershey, PA
Ormo Loma Sanitary
District, CA
Weyerhaeuser
Longview, WA (NaOCI)
Miller Brewing Co.
Fulton, NY
Major Filamentous Organism (s)
Causing Bulking
type 0041
type 0092
H. hydrossis
type 1701
type 1 701
type 02 1N
type 02 1N
type 0581
type 0041
type 0092
S. natans
type 1701
type 1863
H. hydrossis
type 1 701
type 021 N
type 08 12
type 0041
type 0675
Thiothrix sp
M. parvicella
H. hydrossis
type 1 701
type 0675
type 1851
type 0041
type 0675
Stroh Brewing Co.
Longview, TX
(NaOCI to Aeration Basin)
Champion International
(Pulp and Paper)
Courtland, AL

Monterey Regional Water
Pollution Control Plant
Monterey, CA
City of Redding, CA
Westchester County
Yonkers, NY
Thames Water Authority
(UK) (NaOCI)
type 1851
type 021N
Nostocoida limicola II
Thiothrix sp
type 1701

Nostocoida limicola II
type 1701
Thiothrix sp
type 1701
S. natans
type 1701
Nostocoida limicola
type 021N
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
Concord, CA
City of Pacifica, CA
type 02 1N
M. parvicella
Thiothrix sp
S. natans
type 1701
 in  combination with  an  anionic  polymer. In some
 cases, lime,  ferric chloride, or other inorganic  precipi-
 tants have been added to systems, producing a heavy
 precipitate that forces the  sludge floe to settle. This
 method  greatly increases the solids  load the  system
 must bear.

 Because overdosing  with  polymers  can degrade
 system performance, careful  testing must be done to
 estimate appropriate doses.

 The use of polymers is an expensive method of bulk-
 ing control. Chemical  costs of up to  $450/MG have
 been reported.

 3.4.4 Addition of chemicals to selectively kill
 filamentous microorganisms.
 Two  main   chemicals —chlorine  and  hydrogen
 peroxide —have been  successfully  used  in the selec-
 tive destruction of filamentous microorganisms.

 3.4.4.1  Chlorine.
 The use of chlorine is  popular in part  because it is fre-
 quently  used  in  effluent  disinfection,  and is thus
 available  at  most  activated  sludge  plants. Chlorine
 may be  added at three points in the system: directly
 into the  aeration tank; into a "loop"  in which  mixed
 liquor is withdrawn from  the aeration  tank, chlorin-
 ated, and returned to  the tank; or into the return ac-
 tivated  sludge (RAS)  stream. The last  is the most
 common and preferred choice, except in plants  where
 aeration  time is very long or where the RAS line is in-
 accessible.

 The following  guidelines must be followed for suc-
 cessful use of chlorination:

 1) A target value of SVI  or  some other floe parameter
 must be set.

 2) Chlorination must  be  used only when  the  target
 value is regularly exceeded; a careful, frequent plot of
 the parameter should  be made to determine whether
 it consistently exceeds the target value.

 3) Chlorine doses must be  known and carefully con-
 trolled, and must  be  added to the sludge  at a point
 where it will mix efficiently.  If it' does not mix well,
 parts of  the sludge will overdose while parts will not
 be chlorinated at all. Poor mixing will cause turbid ef-
 fluents, reduction in treatment efficiency due to killing
 of floe-forming organisms,  and consumption of large
 amounts of chlorine  without control of the bulking
 problem.

 4) Chlorine should be added where chlorine demand is
 at minimum—that  is,  where  the  amount of organic
matter is lowest. Chlorine reacts quickly with am-
monia  and organic matter,  and becomes unavailable
for killing filamentous  microorganisms. It should  not
                                                   25

-------
be added to influent wastewater, or to RAS after it
has begun to mix with influent waste just outside the
aeration tank.

5) Appropriate  parameters must  be  considered  in
selecting a dosing point. These are:
Overall Mass Dose
Expressed in

Local Mass Dose
Expressed in

Frequency of Exposure
  kgCI,
           per day
 103kgSS

  kgCI2

 103 kg SS  per day

day ~1 (times per day
     sludge passes point
     of dose)
Overall Mass Dose is based on the plant's total sludge
inventory and tells how much chlorine must be added
per day.  However, it does not  indicate how often and
in what  concentration  the chlorine should be applied
for a given application  point in the system. The other
three parameters provide such  information.

The local mass dose indicates the quantity of chlorine
which  must be added at a dosing  point  in order to
control  the filamentous  microorganisms. The dose
concentration  is the concentration of chlorine to be'
added  at the dosing point to achieve the local mass

Table 4. Usa of Hydrogen Peroxide for Bulking Control
dose. However, the dose concentration  must be low
enough so that a small part of the sludge inventory is
not exposed to  excessively  high chlorine doses.  In
such cases,  the exposed sludge floe can  be complete-
ly destroyed while the bulk of the solids inventory is
unaffected.  Also, the frequency of exposure of the
sludge inventory to the chlorine dose must be high
enough to  control  the filamentous microorganisms
(generally greater than once per day). If proper control
of filamentous microorganisms cannot  be achieved
because  of  insufficient  frequency of  exposure  or
because the local  mass dose cannot be achieved at a
reasonable dose concentration,  then a change in the
dosing point or the addition of a dosing  point(s) may
be necessary.

6) Reliable control tests must be performed to assess
the effectiveness  of  chlorination.  These include a
measure  of  sludge settling  rate  (such  as  SVI); a
measure  of  final  effluent turbidity (such as  a tur-
bidimeter or  a  Secchi disc); and microscopic examina-
tion of the  sludge,  to observe progressive deforma-
tion of filamentous microorganisms or to detect signs
of overdosing  (such as total elimination of  filamen-
tous microorganisms and presence  of broken floes).
The progressive effects of chlorination on type 1701
and Thiothrix spp. are  illustrated in Figure 11.  Types
of filamentous microrganism successfully controlled
by chlorination appear in Table 3.
Location
PETALUMA
full-scale plant
Reference
ANON, FMC Corp. (1973)
Caropreso eta/. (1974)
Successful
concentration, mg/l
9-68
average 31.5
ST. AUGUSTINE
full-scale plant

SAN JOSE
lab scale,
fill and draw

PRINCETON
small full-scale

WILMINGTON
lab-scale

WASHINGTON
pilot plant

TEXTILE MILL
        ANON, FMC Corp. (1976)
        Strunk and Shapiro (1976)
        Caropreso eta/. (1974)
        Coleefa/. (1973)
        Cole eta/. (1973)
        Keller and Cole (1973)
              12 (basis unclear)
              40-200
              100b
              40-200b
              20-40"
              200-4003

              60 (basis unclear)
•Based on Wastewater inflow.
"Based on volume of aeration basin and clarifier (single dose).
                                                  26

-------
Figure 11.  Progressive effects of chlorination on type 1701 (a, b, and c) and Thiothrix sp. (d, e, and fl: a. and d. no chlorination; b. and e. moderate
           chlorination effects; and c. and f. severe chlorination effects (all 1000X phase contrast).
                                                                                           ^«**".

 Reference: Jenkins ef at.
                                                                   27

-------
3.4.4.2 Hydrogen peroxide.
The use of hydrogen peroxide (H202, 50 percent by
volume)  has  been effective in  both continuous and
batch dosing  when added to "the aeration tank, to the
RAS line, and to the mixed liquor as it passes between
the  aeration  tank  and  the  clarification  tank.  It
presumably attacks  the sheath of  the  filamentous
microorganism, destroying its shape, and resulting  in
progressive deformation like that  seen in chlorination.

Mixing is important with H2O2 as it  is with chlorine.
Somewhat higher doses and longer contact times, may
be needed.

It  is  possible  that  as H2O2 kills filamentous
microorganisms, it also releases oxygen. If bulking was
a result of low DO, this could provide additional im-
provement in operations. However, if sludge oxidizes
H2O2  before   it has  a chance  to  kill  filamentous
microorganisms, this treatment will not be effective.

Examples of the use of hydrogen peroxide in  bulking
control are  shown in Table 4.
                                                 28

-------
                                             Chapter 4
4.0 Activated Sludge Foaming
Several different types of foam have been observed in
activated sludge treatment systems. Some are normal
and  harmless,  while others are signs of operating
problems and need to be controlled.

4.1 Symptoms of Sludge Foaming
At  the  startup of an activated  sludge plant,  while
solids concentrations and Sludge Age  are low,  white
froth  usually occurs.  As the process  stabilizes and
solids build up, this type  of foam usually disappears. If
excessive, sudsy white foam persists, the Sludge Age
may be too low, or there may be nonbiodegradable
substances  in  the   waste  (industrial wastes  or
cleaners). A more troublesome foam,  heavy,  viscous,
and brown,  can appear  on the surface of both aera-
tion and clarification tanks, degrading the effluent and
spilling over onto walkways. While, this type  of foam
has been attributed to a  high Sludge Age, filamentous
microorganisms may also  be involved  in  its produc-
tion.

4.2 Role of Filamentous  Microorganisms in
Sludge Foaming
Analysis of samples of sludge from systems  contain-
ing heavy brown foam has revealed large numbers of
the filamentous microorganism  Nocardia (see Figure
12). While the mechanisms  of Nocardia foaming are
not fully understood, it  is believed that Nocardia cell
walls are hydrophobic,  and sufficient quantities  of
Nocardia can make sludge floes hydrophobic. Thus the
floe would not be wettable and would cling to air bub-
bles, resulting in a scum.

4.3 Factors Affecting the Presence of
Nocardia
The causes of Nocardia growth in activated sludge are
not well understood. However, researchers have found
correlations  between high Nocardia counts  and vari-
ous sludge parameters. These include high Sludge Age
and warm  temperature  oil and  grease in the waste-
water, low F/M ratio, and high SS levels.

4.4  Control of Activated Sludge Foaming
Because the mechanisms of this phenomenon are as
yet so little understood, there is  no single  proven
method of controlling  it.  However,  some  standard
methods have had some success.

4.4.1  Physical methods.
The most common physical method of foam control is
the use of low-volume water spray to rupture  the
bubbles in the foam. This method is not effective with
very stable foams, which  usually must be collapsed
and diluted by high-volume sprays. Use of this method
is often complicated by the fact that the scum traps in
most secondary clarifiers are too small to receive  the
amount of foam Nocardia can cause, and the scum
trap drainage pipes  are usually  too narrow  for such
foam to flow out.

Grease  and oil related problems are best solved by a
strong   industrial  waste  enforcement  program  and
control  of commercial grease traps'. High amounts of
grease   and oil coupled with high temperatures  and
high suspended solids  contribute  to the presence of
Nocardia and may act as a causitive agent to keep the
population alive.

4.4.2  Process manipulations.
The  most common  approach to  Nocardia foaming
control  is to reduce the Sludge Age by increasing  the
sludge  wasting rate,  thus  washing out  the Nocardia,
and  concurrently  increasing the  F/M  loading. This
process is affected "by temperature—the higher  the
waste  temperature,  the further  the operator must
lower  the Sludge  Age. This  approach works only
when the  plant is capable  of handling the increase in
waste activated sludge, and when nitrification will  not
be performed (the Sludge Age required for nitrification
makes  Nocardia washout impossible by this means).

Another process manipulation involves the addition of
sludge  from an anaerobic  digester. Such sludge may
contain material that is  toxic to Nocardia. This method
has had only mixed success in laboratory studies.

4.4.3  Chemical methods.
The use of chemical antifoam agents in combatting
Nocardia  foam does  not  have  a good  record  of
success.

However,  a  combination   of   physical  removal,
chlorination, and addition  of ferric chloride has been
                                                 29

-------
used to reduce Nocardia populations to a manageable
level.

The most important consideration in control of Nocar-
dia, regardless of the method chosen, is the preven-
tion  of foam recycling.  If such  foam  is recycled
through the system, it will reseed  the sludge.  When
the contents of scurn traps are fed back to  gravity
thickeners or the HAS, while wasting  continues to
remove the  mixed liquor  and sludge from  which the
scum  separated, Nocardia  becomes  concentrated in
the system.
                                                 30

-------
Figure 12. Nocardia foaming in activated sludge: a. and b. foam on the aeration basin; c. and d. microscopic appearance of Nocardia foam
          (c. 400x phase contrast; bar = 25 jun; d. 1000x phase contrast; bar= lOyttm).
                                                             31

-------

-------
                                              Chapter 5
5.0 Appendix 1 —Methods for Microscopic
     Examination of Filamentous
     Microorganisms in Activated Sludge
Microscopic examination of activated sludge is an im-
portant tool  for the identification of sludge settling
problems. Determining the number and type of fila-
mentous microorganisms is the first step in controlling
bulking and foaming.

Such  examination requires a  research-grade phase
contrast microscope with  100x  and 900-1000 X
phase  contrast objectives. A mechanical stage  is es-
sential for controlled scanning. A binocular head (or
trinocular head if photography is desired)  and built-in
light  source  are  highly  recommended.  An ocular
micrometer  should be  inserted into one of the eye-
.pieces and calibrated at each magnification employed
using a stage micrometer.

A photographic record of sample appearance at 100 X
is recommended for reference  purposes. A  35mm
camera mounted on the trinocular head is most con-
venient.  The camera should have a built-in light meter
and a  replaceable, fine ground-glass focusing screen.
Polaroid  instant film  cameras can be used. It is con-
venient  and  highly efficient to  take all photographs
using  color  slide film (e.g., Kodak tungsten-balanced
type II professional film designated KPA), and produce
color or  black-and-white prints from the slides using a
slide printer employing Polaroid instant film.

Because many of the observations to be made in these
procedures are close to the limit of resolution of the
light microscope,  and many  of the features to  be
studied are difficult to detect, the microscope must be
in good  condition. Regular adjustment of the  phase
rings is  required, the microscope  objectives must be
kept clean, and a dust-free environment is necessary.
Professional servicing of the microscope by the manu-
facturer  or recommended agent should be performed
at least once per year.

5.1  Sampling Methods
Samples of activated sludge mixed liquor should be
taken  from the effluent end of  the aeration  tank, or
from the mixed liquor channel between the  aeration
tank and the clarification tank. Mixed liquor samples
should be  taken below  the surface, excluding any
foam or other floating material. If the activated sludge
is foaming, a separate foam sample should be taken
from the surface of the  effluent end of the aeration
tank, from  the surface of the mixed liquor channel, or
from the surface of the clarification tank. Subsurface
liquid should be excluded  from  foam  samples.  Al-
though foams can be thick and viscous and difficult to
transfer to  sample bottles, they should not be diluted
to ease sampling, because this will prevent compari-
son  of the relative abundance of  filamentous micro-
organisms in the foam and the mixed liquor.

Some activated sludge process modifications  contain
more than  one  tank, e.g., step-feed, contact stabiliza-
tion, or "plug-flow" systems. In such systems, char-
acteristics of the sludge in all tanks are usually similar.
Thus it is  usually not necessary to sample all tanks,
only the effluent end of the aeration tank. Where ah
activated sludge plant consists of  separate and paral-
lel systems, there may be differences in floe  and fila-
mentous microorganism  characteristics  in  each sys-
tem, especially  if there is not complete admixture of
the return activated sludge (RAS) streams. In this situ-
ation, a sample  is  required  from each  system. Simi-
larly, for two-stage activated  sludge systems (e.g.,
"carbonaceous" first-stage followed  by  "nitrifica-
tion" second-stage), a sample from the aeration tank
of each stage is necessary for proper characterization
of floe  structure and filamentous microorganism pop-
ulations. Some  activated  sludge systems   treat  a
waste that has been pretreated in another type of bio-
logical treatment system (lagoon or trickling filter).
These units may seed the activated sludge with fila-
mentous microorganisms. To determine the extent of
this seeding, a sample should be taken  of the waste
entering the activated sludge system.

Sampling and examination frequency will be dictated
by plant circumstances and by the location of exami-
nation of samples.  During critical periods (when bulk-
ing  is occurring  or  is anticipated, during the use of
RAS chlorination  for bulking control and  during
periods of  experimental operation), daily onsite exami-
nation  can be  justified. Routine  onsite examination
may be performed once or twice per  week. Offsite
                                                   33

-------
 examination may  be performed weekly, monthly,  or
 seasonally,  depending  on the severity of problems
 being encountered or the desire to establish an operat-
 ing  history  (and  on the budget  available  for this
 activity).

 Samples should be examined as soon as possible after
 they are taken. When  examination  is performed on-
 site,  samples  not  examined  within   several  hours
 should  be  stored at  4°C in a refrigerator.  When
 samples must be transported offsite for analysis, they
 should be sent in sample  containers in which there is
 an air space at least equal to the volume of the sample,
to avoid septicity. (Five to 10 ml are needed for typical
 microscopic examination,  so  a 20-25 ml vial will be
 adequate.) The sample should be neither  chemically
preserved nor frozen, since these  procedures can alter
the characteristics of the floes and filamentous micro-
organisms. The longer the time that elapses between
sampling and examination, the more difficult and un-
certain  sample examination  and data interpretation
 become. Samples  from plants with low organic load-
ings (long Sludge Ages) maintain their characteristics
longer than  samples from plants with high organic
loadings (short Sludge  Ages). For  long Sludge Age
samples, a satisfactory examination can be obtained if
the sample  is looked at within 7  to  10 days of sam-
pling; for sludges from highly loaded plants, it is wise
to examine the activated sludge within 3 to 4 days of
its sampling. With  the availability of express mail and
overnight delivery services, transit time should  pose
no problem in offsite analysis.

Filamentous microorganism staining reactions can  be
quite sensitive to prolonged sample storage. If much
time is expected to pass between sampling and exam-
ination, two air-dried  smears  on microscope  slides
should be  prepared  at the time of sampling (using
techniques outlined below) and  sent together with the
sample. In this way,  the original characteristics of the
activated  sludge will  be  preserved  for  conducting
Gram and Neisser stains.  The slides should be marked
with sample identification, date, and G or N (Gram or
Neisser), on the side  of the slide containing the smear.
The  same  procedure should  be followed if samples
cannot be analyzed immediately upon receipt.

5.2  Staining Procedures

Two  primary staining procedures  are used  in the
examination of activated sludge samples—the Gram
stain  and the Neisser stain.  Other procedures  with
more specialized uses are the "S" test, for sulfur oxi-
dation to detect intracellular sulfur granules; India Ink
reverse  staining, to  detect  the presence  of large
amounts of extracellular  polymers; PHB staining,  to
detect the  presence  of intracellular storage products
such as polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB); and staining with
crystal violet, to allow examination of sheaths. The
procedures are discussed in the following subsections.
                                                  34

-------
5.2.1  Gram stain, modified Hucker method.
Preparation:
Solution 1: Prepare the following separately, then combine:
           A                                     B
Crystal Violet
Ethanol, 95%
2g
20ml
Ammonium oxalate      0.8 g
Distilled water           80ml
Solution 2:
Iodine
Potassium iodide
Distilled water
Solution 3:
1 g
2g
3000 ml
Safranin O (2.5 percent in 95 percent ethanol)     10 ml
Distilled water                                   100 ml
Procedure:
1. Prepare thin smears on microscope slides and thoroughly air dry (do not heat fix).
2. Stain 1 min. with Solution 1; rinse 1 sec. with water.
3. Stain 1 min. with Solution 2; rinse well with water.
4. Hold slide at an angle and decolorize with 95 percent ethanol added drop by drop to the smear for 25 sec. Do
   not over decolorize. Blot dry.
5. Stain with Solution 3 for 1 min.; rinse well with water and blot dry.
6. Examine under oil immersion at 1000 X magnification with direct illumination (not phase contrast): blue-violet
   is positive; red is negative.
                                                    35

-------
5.2.2 Neisser stain.
Preparation:
Solution 1:
Separately prepare and store the following:
            A
                             B
Methlylene Blue
Ethanol, 95%
Acetic acid, glacial
Distilled water
 0.1 g        Crystal Violet (10 percent w/v in  95%
  5 ml        ethanol)                              3.3 ml
  5ml        Ethanol, 95%                        6.7ml
100 ml        Distilled water                        100 ml
Mix 2 parts by volume of A with 1 part by volume of B; prepare fresh monthly.
Solution 2:
Bismark Brown (1 percent w/v aqueous)   33.3 ml
Distilled water                            66.7 ml
Procedure:
1. Prepare thin smears on microscope slides and thoroughly air dry. Do not heat fix.
2. Stain 30 sec. with Solution 1; rinse  1 sec.  with water.
3. Stain 1 min.  with Solution 2; rinse well with water; blot dry.
4. Examine under oil immersion at 1000X magnification with direct illumination (not phase contrast): blue-violet
   is positive (either entire cell or intracellular granules); yellow-brown is negative.
                                                   36

-------
5.2.3  "S" test (sulfur oxidation)
Test A (modified from Eikelboom 1975)
Solution: Sodium sulfide solution (Na2S-9H2O) 1.0 g/l (prepare weekly)
Procedure:
1. On a microscope slide mix 1 drop of activated sludge sample and 1 drop sodium sulfide solution.
2. Allow to stand open to the air 10-20 min.
3. Place a coverslip on the preparation and gently press to  exclude excess solution; remove expelled solution
   with a tissue.                                     ,
4. Observe at 1000 X  using phase contrast. A positive S test is the observation of highly refractive, yellow-
   colored intracellular granules (sulfur granules) (Figure 22b).,
This test, at times, gives variable results. This  is due to methodological problems involving the relative concen-
trations of sulfide and oxygen  present (sulfur  oxidation  is an aerobic  process). An  alternative sulfur oxidation
test, developed by Nielsen (1984), may be used:
Test B (modified from Neilsen 1984)
Solution: Sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3-5H2O) 1 g/100 ml
Procedure:
1. Allow activated sludge sample to settle, and transfer 20 ml of clear supernatant to a 100 ml Erlenmeyer flask.
2. Add 1 -2 ml of activated sludge to the flask.
3. Add 1 ml of thiosulfate solution to the flask (final thiosulfate concentration is 2mM).
4. Shake the flask overnight at room temperature.
5. Observe at 1000X  phase contrast, as above.
                                                    37

-------
 5.2.4 India Ink reverse stain.
 Solution:  India  ink  (aqueous  suspension  of carbon
 black particles)

 Procedure:

 1.  Mix one drop of India ink and one drop of activated
    sludge  sample on a microscope slide.  Depending
    on the ink used, the  sample volume may need to be
    reduced.

 2.  Place on the cover slip and observe at 1000 X  using
    phase contrast.

 3.  In "normal" activated sludge,  the  India ink par-
    ticles penetrate the floes almost completely, at
    most leaving a clear center.

 4.  In activated sludge containing  large amounts of
    exocellular polymeric material, there will be large,
    clear areas containing a low density of cells.

 5.2.5  PHB (polyhydroxybutyrate) stain.
 Solution 1: Sudan Black B (IV), 0.3  percent w/v in 60
 percent ethanol

 Solution 2: Safranin 0 0.5 percent w/v aqueous

 Procedure:

 1.  Prepare  thin smears on a microscope slide  and
    thoroughly air dry-

 2.  Stain 10 min. with Solution 1; add more stain if the
    slide starts to dry out.

 3.  Rinse 1  sec. with water.

 4.  Stain 10 sec. with Solution 2;  rinse  well  with
    water; blot dry.

 5.  Examine under oil immersion at 1000 x magnifica-
    tion  with transmitted light: PHB granules will ap-
    pear  as  intracellular,  blue-black  granules  while
    cytoplasm will be pink or clear.

 5.2.6 Crystal Violet sheath stain.
Solution: Crystal Violet, 0.1  percent w/v acqueous
solution

Procedure:

 1.  Mix  1  drop activated sludge sample and  1  drop
    Crystal  Violet  solution  on  a   microscope  slide,
    cover and examine at 1000 x magnification phase
    contrast. Cells  stain  deep violet  while the sheaths
    are clear to pink.
 5.3  Examination Procedures
 Upon sample receipt, or at least within several hours
 prior  to sample examination, spread  1  drop of the
 sample evenly  over approximately 50 percent of the
 area of each of two 25 X 77 mm microscope slides.
 Allow these slides to air dry at room temperature (do
 not heat fix). The slides can be stored and stained
 later. Mark the  slides with a sample identification code
 and a G or N (Gram or Neisser)  on the side on which
 the smear has  been made (frosted end slides are rec-
 ommended).  Perform the Gram and Neisser staining
 procedures (5.2.1  and 5.2.2).

 Withdraw one drop (approximately 0.05 ml) of sample
 with a loop or a clean, disposable Pasteur pipette and
 place on a  25 X 75 mm microscope  slide. Place  a
 22 mm No.  1 cover slip on the drop, and press down
 gently on the cover slip with a blunt object. Remove
 the liquid that is expelled from the sides of the cover
 slip with a tissue. This procedure ensures a  thin prepa-
 ration,  which  is necessary because of  the  limited
 depth of focus of the microscope optical system.

 Examine the wet mount under phase contrast at 1 00 X
 magnification for the following characteristics:

 1 .  The  general size  and  shape of  floes present;
    measure approximately  10-20  floes  and  place
    them in the  following categories:
a.  Size range:  small  ^
               medium
               large  ^.
                            1 50  m diameter
                            150-500 pm diameter
                            500 /xm diameter
   b. Shape:  rounded and compact,  or irregular and
      diffuse; note whether texture is firm or weak
      (Figure  13a and 13b).

2. The  presence of  protozoa,  organic or  inorganic
   particles,   and  fingered  or  amorphous  zoogleal
   organisms  (Figure ~13c and 13d).

3. The  presence of free (dispersed) cells  in the bulk
   solution (Figure  13b).  Samples  containing  signifi-
   cant amounts of dispersed cells will appear turbid.

4. The  presence and effect  of filamentous  micro-
   organisms on floe structure, as follows:

   a. None

   b. Bridging— filaments extend from the  floe sur-
      face into the bulk solution, and bridge between
      the floes (Figures 14a and 14b).

   c. Open floe structure— the floe population  at-
      taches to and grows around filamentous micro-
      organisms,  leading  to   a  large,  irregularly
      shaped  floe  with  substantial internal  voids
      (Figures 14c and 14d).
                                                  38

-------
Figure 13.  Floe  "texture" in activated sludge (a and fa): a.  rounded, firm compact; b. irregular  and diffuse with  substantial free cells.

           Appearance of fingered (c) and amorphous (d) zoogleal organisms in activated sludge (all lOOx  phase contrast; bar= 100/xm).
                                                                                  «&fet*;j" "
                                                                                  rlFl*?1"*"-


                                                                                    -•-•-  ,<*•:_j^-  . \.^_:-:*iym^«-*sf-f¥~^
                                                                                    ..   -    __£ff-f-;.f*^jf,t^'A~-,-_^f$pf>!^~±-,.~:	':.'... -

                                                                                    y^-Sx'-S^^^" ~ "" "*          mftfto^ %'J"i!L:'i,f Mb-ir

 Reference: Jenkins, et.a/.
                                                                 39

-------
 Figure 14. Effect of filamentous microorganisms in activated sludge on floe morphology and settleability: a. and b. inter-floe bridging; c.
           and d. diffuse floe structure (all lOOx  phase contrast; bar= 100 /xm).
                                                                                                      W&SK^&W
Reference; Jenkins, et.al.
                                                               40

-------
Table 5. Subjective Scoring of Filament Abundance8
Numerical
  Value
Abundance
                              Explanation
    0

    1

    2

    3


    4

    5

    6
none

few

some

common


very common

abundant

excessive
                              Filaments present but only observed in an occasional floe

                              Filaments commonly observed, but not present in all floes

                              Filaments observed in all floes, but at low density (e.g., 1-5 filaments per
                              floe)

                              Filaments observed in all floes at medium density (e.g., 5-20 per floe)

                              Filaments observed in all floes at high density (e.g.,  20 per floe)

                              Filaments present in all floes — appears more filaments than floe and/or
                              filaments growing in high abundance in bulk solution

This scale from 0 to 6 represents a 100 to 1,000-fold range of total extended filament length.
5. The  abundance of filamentous microorganisms.
   This can be quantified by several methods. For the
   purpose of the type of analysis required here, a
   subjective scoring system is  used. Filamentous
   microorganisms are observed at 100 x and subjec-
   tively rated for overall abundance on a scale from 0
   (none) to  6  (excessive) (Table 5).  An abundance
   rating is determined for the sample as a whole  (all
   filament types together) and for each filamentous
   microorganism  observed.   Individual filamentous
   microorganisms are  considered  dominant  (and
   probably most responsible  for bulking problems) if
   they are scored "very common" or higher. Organ-
   isms are considered secondary (present, but  not in
   sufficient  abundance  to  account  for  a bulking
   problem) if they are scored "common" or lower.

   This method is rapid and is suitable for establishing
   whether a filamentous  organism  is dominant or
   secondary. Abundance categories generally are re-
   producible to within  ± one abundance category be-
   tween observers.  Examples of filament abundance
   categories are shown in Figure 15.

Other methods of microorganism  counting are de-
scribed below.

5.4 Counting Procedures
In addition to the subjective scoring method for count-
ing  filamentous microorganisms, other  more detailed
procedures exist for measuring the total extended fila-
ment length (TEFL) in activated sludge.
                                        5.4.1  Filament measurement technique of Sezgin
                                              et al. (1978).
                                        1.  Transfer 2  ml of a well-mixed activated  sludge
                                           sample of  known suspended solids concentration
                                           using a wide-mouth pipette (0.8 mm diameter tip)
                                           to 1 liter of distilled water in a 1.5-liter beaker and
                                           stir at 95 rpm on a jar test apparatus (G = 85sec~1)
                                           for 1 min.

                                        2.  Using the  same  pipette,  transfer  1.0 ml  diluted
                                           sample to  a microscopic counting chamber cali-
                                           brated to contain 1.0  ml and cover with a glass
                                           cover slip.

                                        3,  Using a binocular microscope at 100 X magnifica-
                                           tion with an ocular  micrometer scale, count the
                                           number of  filaments present in the  whole chamber
                                           or a known  portion  of it and  place these in the
                                           following size classifications: 0 to 10 pm, 10 to 25
                                           /j,m, 25 to 50 j«m, 50 to 100 ^m, 100 to 200 fj.m,
                                           200 to 400 pm,  400 to 800 //.m, and greater than
                                           800 fj,m. Measure filaments of length greater than
                                           800 /*m individually.

                                        4.  Express results as the  total /*m of  filament length
                                           per g or ml of MLSS:

                                           total extended  filament length  (TEFL) /ttm/gMLSS
                                           = total filament length, n
-------
 Figure 15.  Filament abundance categories using subjective scoring system: a. few; b. some; c. common; d. very common; e. abundant;
           and f. excessive (all 100x phase contrast; bar= 100 ywi).
Reference: Jenkins, of.a/.
                                                            42

-------
   total  extended  filament  length  (TEFL)  ^m/ml
   MLSS = total  filament length,   m, in the  1.0 ml
   diluted sample X the dilution factor ( X 500 in the
   above example).
5.4.2 Diluted SVI procedure of Stobbe (1984).
Several researchers have found close  correlations be-
tween the  number  of filamentous microorganisms in
sludge  and a parameter  known as  Diluted Sludge
Volume Index (DSVI). The DSVI can be used to predict
sludge  settling  properties and is well  correlated  to
TEFL.

1. Set  up several 1 -liter  graduated  cylinders  (the
   number will depend on prior knowledge of the set-
   tleability of the sludge).

2. Using well-clarified  secondary effluent,  prepare a
   series of two-fold dilutions of the activated sludge
   (i.e., no dilution, 1:1 dilution;  1:3 dilution).

3. Stir the graduate cylinders individually for 30-60
   sec.  using a plunger to  resuspend and uniformly
   distribute the sludge solids.

4. Allow the activated sludge to settle for 30  min.
   under quiescent conditions.

5. Observe the  settled sludge volume  (SV30) in the
   graduated cylinder  where the settled volume is
   less than and closest to 200 ml (SV30< 200 ml).

6. Calculate the diluted SVI  using:
                    SS (g/l)
   where n is the number of two-fold  dilutions re-
   quired to obtain a settled sludge volume (SV30) less
   than  200 ml and SS is the suspended solids con-
   centration of the undiluted activated sludge.
4. The eyepiece is fitted with a single hairline. Count
   the number of times that any filamentous micro-
   organism intersects the hairline.

5. Total  the number of intersections  for  all  fields
   examined. This is the Filament Count.  If a "unit
   count"  is desired, the Filament  Count  must be
   multiplied by the number of fields in the 22 mm
   width of the slide. At San Jose this is 12 fields.
   Thus
   Filament Count/^l = -
(filament intersections in)
     field counted
         50/tl
-X12
SJ/SCWPCP has correlated filament count with SVI.
However, filament  count  cannot  provide  an early
warning  for problems caused by increased SVI,  be-
cause the two are temporally correlated.
 5.4.3 Simplified filament counting technique used by
       the San Jose/Santa Clara (California) Water
       Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SCWPCP).
 This method does not directly measure TEFL.  Rather,
 it counts the number of times filaments intersect a
 single line on  the  microscope eyepiece, for  several
 fields of view across a wet mount preparation of the
 activated sludge sample.

 1.  Transfer 50 /xl mixed liquor sample to a glass slide.

 2.  Cover completely with a 22 X 30 mm cover slip.

 3.  Using 100 X total magnification and starting at the
    edge of the cover  slip, observe consecutive fields
    across the  entire 30 mm length of the cover slip.
    At SJ/SCWPCP this is 17 fields.
                                                   43

-------

-------
                                             Chapter 6
6.0 Appendix 2 — Microscopic Identification
     of Filamentous Microorganisms
The other important part of microscopic study of acti-
vated sludge samples is identification of the type(s) of
filamentous microorganisms present in the sludge.

6.1  Observation of Microorganism
     Characteristics
Scan the sample at 100x  using phase contrast to
ascertain the number of different types of filamentous
microorganisms present.  Carefully  characterize each
filamentous  microorganism  present by looking  at
several filaments of each type and expressing the re-
sults as an  "average." Use count sheets such as the
ones presented in  Table  6 to record and summarize
observations.

This task can be simplified by accepting only a limited
number of descriptions, and learning  to recognize spe-
cial features  that  provide  clues to the filamentous
microorganism type. These features are:

  1. Branching — present  or absent;  if  present,
    whether true or false branching.

    True branching is cell branching where  there is a
    contiguous  cytoplasm  between  branched tri-
    chomes (Figure 16a, 16b, and 16c). In activated
    sludge  the  only branched trichome-forming
    microorganisms are fungi and Nocardia spp., and
    Nostocoida  limicola  (observed  incidentally).
    False branching occurs when there is no contin-
    uous cytoplasm  between trichomes;   two tri-
    chomes have merely stuck together and grown
    outward (Figure 16d). In  activated sludge, false
    branching usually is  only  observed for Sphaero-
    tilus natans, but also has been  reported inciden-
    tally for type 1701.

  2. Motility— none, or, if present, describe.

    Only a few filamentous  microorganisms in acti-
    vated sludge  are motile.  Beggiatoa spp., Flexi-
    bacter  spp.,   and  some blue-green   bacteria
    (Cyanophyceae) are  motile by  gliding;  Thiothrix
    spp. and type 021N may display limited "twitch-
    ing" or swaying motions.
3. Filament shape —straight,  smoothly-curved,
   bent, irregularly-shaped  "chain of cells," coiled,
   or mycelial (Figure  17).

4. Co/or—transparent, medium, dark (Figure  18a,
   18b, and 18c).

5. Location—extending from  flbc  surface, found
   mostly within the  floe,  or free in the liquid be-
   tween floes (Figure 18d, 18e and 18f).

6. Attached growth of epiphytic unicellular bacteria
   — present or absent; if present, whether substan-
   tial growth or incidental (Figure 19).

7. Sheath—present or absent.

   The presence of a sheath is one of the most diffi-
   cult characteristics to establish. A true sheath is
   a clear structure (hence, hard to observe) exterior
   to the cell wall.  Sheaths can be seen best in un-
   stained preparations when they are empty of the
   cells, or  when some of the  cells are missing.  In
   the latter case the outline of the sheath can be
   seen  continuing along  either side of the empty
   space (Figure   20). Several  features  of fila-
   mentous microorganisms can be  confused with
   sheaths.  A yellowish  "halo" observed  around
   filaments under phase contrast observation is not
   a sheath, but an artifact of phase contrast illumi-
   nation. Short, empty spaces in a'trichome or  at
   the trichome apex  should be used to indicate the
   presence of a sheath. The cell wall of some fila-
   mentous microorganisms may remain  after cell
   lysis; however, this can be distinguished from a
   sheath because some  evidence of pre-existing
   cross-walls usually remains.  This  is commonly
   observed for type 021N.

   Presence of substantial attached  growth gener-
   ally indicates the presence of a sheath.  Staining
   wet  mounts with Crystal Violet  (Section 5.2.6)
   may aid in sheath detection (Figure 20f).

8. Cross-walls (cell septa) — present, absent.

   This  feature can be variable for some filamentous
   microorganisms, and detection is dependent  on
   the quality and adjustment of the microscope. It
                                                  45

-------
Table 6. Suggested Format for Filamentous Microorganism Identification Worksheet
 No.
      . Sample.
 SAMPLE DATE.
 FILAMENT ABUNDANCE
                           0
                         None
            1
          Few
FILAMENT EFFECT ON FLOC STRUCTURE:


MORPHOLOGY OF FLOC:    |      | Firm

                          |      | Weak

FLOC DIAMETER (  m)
                                     OBSERVATION DATE.
  23456
Some    Common     Very     Abundant  Excessive
                   Common
                 Little or None
               Bridging
Open Floe Structure
                             |     |  Round, Compact

                                    Irregular, Diffuse
                             FEATURES:
      150     150-500
500
           Free cells in suspension.

           Zoogloea's	
                                                        Inorganic/Organic Particles
   FILAMENTOUS MICROORGANISM SUMMARY:

Nocardia sp.
type 1701
S. natans
type 021 N
Thtothrixsp.
type 0041
H. hydrossis
N. limicola
Rank








Abundance









M. parvicella
type 0581
type 0092
type 0803
type 1851
type 0961
other
other
Rank








Abundance








REMARKS:
                     x = Dominant
              0 = Secondary
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                             46

-------
Table 6 (continued).
No.
. Sample .
COMMENTS:
OBSERVATION OF:
  Protozoa
  Metazoa:
WET MOUNT OBSERVATION, 1000X, PHASE CONTRAST:
FILAMENT #            A             B
BRANCHING
MOTILITY
FILAMENT SHAPE
        COLOR
        LOCATION
ATTACHED UNICELLS
SHEATH
CROSSWALLS
FILAMENT DIAMETER
         LENGTH
CELL SHAPE
     SIZE
SULFUR DEPOSITS
OTHER GRANULES
COMMONNESS
RANK
STAINS, 1000X
  GRAM
  NEISSER
 I.D.
 Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                            47

-------
 Figure 16. Trichome branching observed for filamentous  microorganisms in activated  sludge:  a., b. and  c.  true branching  (fungus,
           Nocardta sp., and Nostocoida limicola II respectively); d. false-branching (Sphaerotilus natans) (all  1000X  phase contrast;
Reference: Jenkins, of,a/.
                                                               48

-------
Figure 17. Examples of filament shapes: a. straight; b. smoothly-curved; c.  bent; d. irregularly-shaped "chain of cells"; e.  coiled; and
          f. mycelial (all 1000 x phase contrast).

                                                                                                           'Y   !
i  Y   \v
;. •-»    M
a "    - * -    %. i
                                                                                                  A
                                                                                                   \
                                                                                                                         ;

                                                                                                                        h
Reference: Jenkins, et.al.
                                                              49

-------
Figure 18,  "Color" of filamentous microorganisms (a, b and c): a. transparent; b. medium; and c. dark. Location of filaments in activated
           sludge (d, eand fl: d. extending from floe surface; e. most within the floe; and f. free (all 1000 x phase contrast).
Roforonco: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                             50

-------
Figure 19. Attached growth of epiphytic bacteria on filamentous microorganisms: a., b. and c. substantial (types, 0041, 0675 and 1701
          respectively); d. incidental (type 1851) (all 1000x contrast).
 Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.

-------
 Ffgwo 20. Appearance of sheaths: a. Sphaerotilus natans; b. type 1701; c. Thiothrix II; d. Thiothrix I; e. type 0041; and f. type 1701,
            stained with crystal violet (all 1000x phase contrast).
Roforenco: Jenkins, era/., 1984.
                                                             52

-------
Figure 21. Cell shapes observed for  filamentous microorganisms in  activated sludge: a. square; b. rectangular; c. oval;  d.  barrel;
          e. discoid; and f. round-ended rods (all 1000x phase contrast).
 Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                               53

-------
     is  important to determine  whether a  true  tri-
     chome is present (Figure 17b) or whether the fila-
     ment is made up of a chain of cells (Figure 17d).

  9.  Filament diameter—Both  the  average diameter
     and its range in fim should be measured; it is im-
     portant to note whether the diameter is greater
     than 1  pm or less than 1 /mi.

10.  Filament length—range in fim.

11.  Cell  shape—square,  rectangular,  oval,   barrel,
     discoid, round-ended rods (Figure 21).

     It is important to note whether there are indenta-
     tions at cell septa (Figure 21c, 21d, 21e, and
     21 f) or whether trichome walls are straight at the
     cell junctions (Figure 21 a and 21 b).

12.  Size—average length and width of cells in /j.m.

13.  Sulfur deposits—present or  absent in situ and
     present or absent after the S  test (Section 5.2.3)
     (Figures 22a and 22b).

     Under phase contrast  observation,  sulfur gran-
     ules appear  as  bright  yellow-colored  cell inclu-
     sions, either  in the shape of spheres observed for
     Thfothrix spp., Beggiatoa spp., and type  021N
     (Figure  22c,  22d, and 22e); or in the shape  of
     squares for type 0914 (Figure  22f). Type 0914
     does not respond to the S test.

14.  Other granules—present  or  absent. Commonly
     observed  granules  are  polyphosphate (Neisser
     positive granules), and PHB  (confirmed by PHB
     staining) (Section 5.2.5).

15.  Staining  reactions—Each filamentous  micro-
     organism  present  is  separately evaluated  for
     Gram staining and  Neisser staining  reaction by
     observing the stained smears  at 900-1000 x
     using transmitted light (not phase contrast). The
     position and  length of filamentous  microorgan-
     isms  in the  wet  mount and  the  presence  or
     absence of attached growth  should  be carefully
     noted so  that the same filament types  can be
     examined in the stained smears. Care is required
     in this  observation  because some  filamentous
     microorganisms  change size upon  drying and
    staining (e.g., type 0092 appears much  wider
    when Neisser stained than in wet mounts).

    The Gram stain requires much practice. Reagents
    should be reasonably fresh (3-6 months) and, if
    possible, should be tested on  fresh cultures of
    known  Gram reaction. The  decolorization step
    should  be controlled  precisely  to  avoid  over-
    decolorization. Also, large floes  do not decolorize
    fully,  so the Gram reactions inside large  floes
    should be ignored.
     Score the Gram reaction as positive, negative, or
     variable.  Most  filamentous microorganisms  ob-
     served in  activated  sludge  are  Gram negative
     (Figure 23a and 23b). Nostocoida  limicola  and
     types 0041 and 0675 most often are Gram posi-
     tive but can be Gram variable or Gram negative
     (Figure 23c). Type  1851 .stains weakly  Gram
     positive, and generally is  observed as a chain of
     Gram positive "beads" (Figure 23d). Thiothrix\,
     Beggiatoa  spp., type  021N, and  type  0914
     generally  stain  Gram negative,  but may stain
     Gram positive  when they  contain  substantial
     intracellular sulfur deposits. Microthrix parvicella
     and Nocardia spp. are generally strongly  Gram
     positive (Figure 23e and 23f).

     Neisser staining is a straightforward technique.
     Score as negative, positive (entire  trichome is
     stained),  or  negative  with  Neisser-positive
     granules (Figure 24).

     Type  0092  (light  purple-Figure 24c)  and N.
     limicola (dark purple —Figure 24d) stain entirely
     Neisser-positive. M. parvicella and Nocardia spp.
     stain  Neisser-negative  but  generally  contain
     Neisser-positive  intracellular  granules  (Figure
     24e and 24f). Beggiatoa spp.,  Thiothrixspp., and
     types 0041, 0675, 021N, 0914 and 1863 may
     contain Neisser-positive  granules  (infrequently).
     In addition, H.  hydrossis and  types  0675 and
     0041  may  have  a  Neisser-positive trichome
     "covering"  (Figure 24b)  when present  in acti-
     vated sludge that is nutrient-deficient.

16. Additional  observations —Two filamentous
     microorganisms, Thiothrix spp. and  type 021N
     (uncommonly) may display rosettes and gonidia.
    A rosette develops when  trichomes  radiate out-
    ward from a common origin (Figure 25).  Gonidia
    are ovalor  rod-shaped cells present  at  the  tri-
    chome apex that are distinctively different in  ap-
    pearance from vegetative  cells (Figures 25, 26,
    and 27).

    The  following  observations   may  indicate  a
    nutrient deficiency (e.g., N and/or P) in activated
    sludge systems:

    •  Large amounts of intracellular PHB granules;

    •  Unusual  Neisser-staining  reactions  of some
       filamentous microorganisms  (see above); and

    •  Large amounts of extracellular  material in the
       floes.  This  is detected  by conducting  the
       India ink negative staining procedure (Section
       5.2.4). When observed at 100x  phase con-
       trast, the Indian ink particles normally can  be
       seen to penetrate deeply into the  floes,  leav-
       ing only a clear center;  when there  are large,
                                                  54

-------
Figure 22. Deposition of intracellular sulfur granules during the S test (a and fa): before (a) and after (fa) adding sodium sulfide. Appearance
         of intracellular sulfur granules in filamentous microorganisms (c, d, e and fl: c. Thiothrix I; d. Thiothrix II;  e. type 021IM; and f.
         type 0914 (all 1000 x phase contrast).
                                                                                  1 •'*«
                                                                                          •x-:
                                                                                                 Nfei
                                                                          ^jLfflSf^^;.* f^!,^ '.^.c!t'i 'fri, •'
                                                                                                      %
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                        55

-------
 Figure 23. Gram stain reaction of filamentous microorganisms: a. and b. Gram negative (types 021N and 0092 respectively); c. Gram
           variable (type 0041); d. weakly Gram positive (type 1851); and e. and f. Gram positive (Microthrix parvicella and Nocardia spp.
           respectively) (all 1000X transmitted light).
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                             56

-------
Figure 24.  Neisser staining reaction of filamentous microorganisms: a. negative; ft. Neisser positive trichome covering observed atypically
           for type 0041; c. and d.  Neisser positive (type 0092 and Nostocoida limicola II respectively); and e. and f. Neisser positive
           granules (Microthrix parvicella and Nocardiaspp. respectively) (all 1000 x transmitted light).
                                                         -i!

Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                               57

-------
Figure 25. Thtothrlx 11 (a and b 100x phase contrast; bar= 100pm; c-f 1000x phase contrast; bar=
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                          58

-------
Figure 26. Type 021N (a 100x phase contrast; bar= 100 ju,m; b-f lOOOx phase contrast; bar= 10/im).
                                                                                - ••   -I _ ' jt -   .-^e'-™
                                                                                "' . ; ,^'-   ^ ^^
                                                                                                                       «*
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.

-------
FIguro27. Thtothrlx\ (a 100x phase contrast; bar= 100jtm; 6-MOOOx phase contrast; bar-
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                          60

-------
       clear areas with  low cell density,  the pres-
       ence of large amounts of extracellular mate-
       rial (probably polysaccharide) is indicated.

    Additional clues pointing to the presence of large
    amounts of this highly water-retentive extracellu-
    lar material are: the  activated sludge settles and
    compacts poorly even though filamentous micro-
    organism abundance is low; the activated sludge
    is slippery or slimy to the touch  and  appears
    viscous when poured.
6.2  Identification of Microorganisms
Observed and  recorded  filament  characteristics  are
used  to characterize the filamentous microorganisms
by  genus or by a numbered type using the dichoto-
mous key shown in Figure 28. This key lists the 22
filamentous bacteria most commonly observed in acti-
vated sludge. To simplify this key, several filamentous
microorganisms having  readily identifiable specific
characteristics are not listed, but are described later.
These include: fungi,  Cyanophyceae,  Flexibacter
spp.,  and Bacillus spp. In .addition,  some filamentous
microorganisms  observed only occasionally in acti-
vated sludge are not included in the key. These include
filament types 1702, 1852,  and 0211.

This dichotomous key is a  modification of the fila-
mentous microorganism  identification  key givep  by
Eikelboom and van Buijsen (1981), with changes.to:

• Deemphasize  the  need  for  observation  of cell
  septa (crosswalls), which  can depend on the qual-
  ity  and adjustment of the microscope used;.and,'

• Include some filamentous microorganisms in the
  key twice  where  an important  characteristic  is
  variable, e.g., Gram stain  reaction for A/, llmicola II
  and the  observation of intracellular sulfur granules
  for types 0914 and 021N.                 '

The use of this key is not without risk because some
filamentous microorganism characteristics vary,  and
the key cannot always address all  of these variables.
The filament type arrived at using  the key should be
carefully  checked against the typical microorganisms
characteristics listed in Table 7, and presented in,the
short descriptions and the photographs of each organ-
ism that follow. If characteristics given in Table 7, or
in the photographs,  do not correspond to the f jlament
type arrived at using the key, careful re-examination of
characteristics used  in the key is irv order. For example,
type 0041  generally gives a  weak Gram, positive.or a
Gram  variable reaction, and as such, is keyed correctly
from Figure 28. However, if strongly Gram positive, it
would be keyed as N. limicola II. Reference to Table 7
shows N. limicola II  to be coiled and to possess no at-
tached growth—type  0041  is straight or smoothly-
 curved  and  most often  has  substantial  attached
 growth.

 Occasionally,  a  filamentous  microorganism  is  ob-
 served that is not represented by a type or genus des-
 ignation. Such a filamentous microorganism should be
 reported as "not identified"; do not try to "force-fit"
 the microorganism into existing filament types.
6.3  Descriptions of Types of Filamentous
      Microorganisms
These short descriptions of each  filamentous micro-
organism commonly observed in activated sludge are
based on information  given  by Eikelboom  and van
Buijsen (1981) as  modified by experience with fila-
mentous microorganism  characteristics in activated
sludges from the USA and South Africa. The following
filament types  usually  are   observed in domestic
wastewater treatment  plants at conventional organic
loading rates:
S. natans
type 1701
type 021N
ThiQthrix I and II
  Beggiatoaspp.
  Nocardia spp.
  N, limicola II
     H. hydrossis
     type 1863
Filament types  observed in  industrial  or domestic
wastewater treatment plants operated at low organic
loading rates are:
type 0041
type 0675
type021N
Thiothrix. I and II
type 0914
 Beggiatoaspp.
 type 1851
 type 0803
 type 0092
-type 0961
M, parvicella
Nocardia spp.
N. limicola I, II,
H. hydrossis
type 0581
Filament types that are observed infrequently include:
fungi
Cyanophyceae
Bacillus spp.
 Flexibacter spp.
 type 1702
 type 1852
type 0211
type 0411
  1.  Sphaerotilus natans. (Figure 29a,  b, and c; see
     also  Figures  16d and 20a.)  Relatively long
     (100-1000 /iifi) straight or smoothly-curved fila-
     ments  composed  of  round-ended, rod-shaped
     cells  (1.0-1.8x1.5-3.0  /mi)  contained in a
     clear, tightly-fitting sheath. Cell septa are clear
     with indentations at septa.  Filaments radiate out-
     ward from the floe surface  into the bulk solution.
     False branching frequently  is observed, giving a
     "tree-branch"-like  appearance.  Gram  negative,
     Neisser negative,  no sulfur granules:  PHB fre-
     quently pbserved.  Cell shape can be rectangular
     when  the cells are tightly packed within the
     sheath. An  exocellular slime coating may occur
     at ,1-iutrient  limitation. Attached  growth  uncom-
     mon^,but may occur when not  growing.
                                                  61

-------
Ffguro28. Dtehotomous key for filamentous microorganism "identification" in activated sludge.






"•— '

X
1
S
H™
—
i
«n
4



4
w
5






































i — i

in
c
4-
CO
c
"^~i 1 i' a ^

« £ s P=i r r— i rri J
i S ^ - - - =
*. — 10 1C (O H)
I 1 i 8 8 8 •; S1
* *•" 1° I s I Ti » r i i i
— — — ir> —
• r- m
1 UJ UJUJ L|J g 2
r>* *A o a)
^ e iJB a °-



IQ_ 04 (M U I- OJ  o 3) c ™ i I
|_J j 4 a a- H 8 LA
* 	 i ii' —• ~ 1_ L. *-
1 v, >n j; w — —
§ ? ¥ f V - 1 !F ^ I
J; i A A A "* CTOIIJ
1 I ^-H t— r-7 s « ^^1
I 1 g.Zf^.0,,
S S t» 0> — U L. 4) W
«f *. 4- £ U _J 0»- — >
f i U, M "! '
1 1 ? n ^5 | ° 4-
~~| • « & -^-P § 'u i
2 - I = il ° I ' T
S"~ n • oj • > T — i 	 1
^ = ° -s >n
S b  c.« o
IQ O* II—
•„ « £ o. j J. . 0°:
fe t. -c c -jo
31 J= C Xt Q-
I & 2 g iS
t « a g ~_
S 8 I o »- =8 •
? e i— a: ^ ^
<9 
tft vi t. ^'- ™
J . ' > >-4) t. Q. Ol
— > to (!)
o>- > E c
O*— E t- E
i_,rt «3O co
4- O t- t-
olQ. ' O CD




E*° c
~^5 to

MU4 <=
C « U
4 	 tf> O 


§
3.
)
1-
)
:






















































2
0)
Q.






















































































T)
'o
u
f^i


u
*L
*~



4-
c:
Si'aj
$ a
— o
||
u o
.«.£
h-







>.
4-
|
4-"
.?+.


"Jr -°
I b
O ~o
•5 >
l_ 3
1— 'J
























f^^™»

5
0




CO

Q.
o
in


O
Q
z:

























—
o
0)
4-
	
r^
CO
i—
-
1

3 fl)
3 U


ScO "
4- >-t- C)
CO > S Q.
^ S£ -f*
t/) £ Ol

«"^~
Ul


n
i.
•a

,
^



Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.

-------
Table?.  Summary  of Typical  Morphological  and Staining Characteristics of Filamentous Microorganisms  Commonly  Observed in
          Activated Sludge
BRIGHT FIELD OBSERVATION



FILAMENT
TYPE
S. natans

type 1701

type 0041
type 0675

type 021 N


Thiothrix I

Thiothrix II

type 0914

Beggiatoa
spp.
type 1851

type 0803

type 0092
typo 0961
M. parvicella
Nocardia spp.

N. Limicola I
N. Limicola II

N. Limicola III

H. hydrossts
type 0581
type 1863

type 041 1



z
GRAM STO





+ .V
+ .V

_


_i +

_

+

-•-<-
+
weak
_

-
-
+
+

-1-
-.+

+

-
-
_

_

z
1

co
ijj
o
1


_

-
_

_


_

_

_

-


_

+
-
-
_

+
+ ,-

+

-
-
_

_

_
C
OJ


_

-•+
_I +

_J +


_1 +

_l+

_1 +

-•+
_

_

-
-
+
+

-
-

_

-
-
_J +

_

PHASE CONTRAST OBSERVATION 1000X
<
tr
o
CO
a
.s


_

-
_

_> +


+r_

+/_

_< +

+ •-
_

_

-
-
-
_

-
-

_

-
-
_

_

!
co


_

-
_

+


+

+

_

+
„

_

-
-
-
_

-
-

„

-
-
_

_



_JCO
OTHER CB
INCLUSIOI

PHB

PHB

-
_

PHB


PHB

PHB

PHB

PHB
_

-

+
-
PHB
PHB

-
PHB

PHB

-
-
_

_

QC
£
tij

TRICHOME DIA

1.0-1.4

0.6 - 0.8

1.4-1.6
0.8-1.0

1.0-2.0


1.4-2.5

0.8-1.4

1.0

1.2-3.0
0.8

0.8

0.8-1.0
0.8-1.2
0.8
1:0

0.8
1.2-1.4

2.0

0.5
0.5 - 0.8
0.8

0.8



1
TRICHOME LE

500

20-80

100-500
50 - 1 50

50-500


100-500

50 - 200

50 - 200

100 - 500
100-300

50-150

20-60
40-80
100-4OO
10-20

100
100 - 200

200-300

20-100
100-200
20-50

50-150

UJ
O-
s
TRICHOME S

. St

St.B

St
St

St.SC


St.SC

St.SC

St

St
St.B

St

St.B
St
C
.I

C
C

C

St.B '
C
B,l "

B.l

•z.
o
p

TRICHOME LOI

E

I.E

I.E
I

E


E

E

E.F

F
E

E.F

I
E
1
1

I.E
I,E

I.E

E.F
1
E.F

E

>

S
CELL SEPTA Cl
OBSERVED

+

+

+
+

+


+

+

+

-' +
+ |_

+

+ -
+
-
+ ,_

-
*

•f

-
'-
+

+



CO
INDENTATIO
CELL SEPTA



+

-
_

+


_

_

_

-
_

_

-
--
-
_

-
+

+

-
-
+

+




X
H-
CO,

+

+

+
+

_


+

+

_

-
+

_

-
-
-
_

-
-

_

+
-
_

_

f.
>
5
ATTACHED GR



+ +

+ +,-
+ +,-

_


_

_

_

-
_,+

_

-
-
-
-

-
-

-

-.+
-
_

_

Q
2

to
-jui
JTJN
uto

round-ended rods
1.4x2.0
round-ended rods
0.8x1.2
squares
1.4X1.5-2.0
squares
1,0X1.0
barrels,, rectan-
gles, discoid
1-2x1.5-2.0
rectangles
2.0x3-5
rectangles
1.0x1.5
squares
1.0X1.0
rectangles
2.0 X 6.0
rectangles
0.8X1.5
rectangles
0.8x1.5
rectangles
0.8X1.5
rectangles
1.0X2.0
-
variable
1.0X1 -2
-
discs, ovals
1.2X1.0

disc, ovals
2.0X1.5
-
-
oval rods
0.8x1-1.5
elongated rods
0.8 X 2:4




NOTES
False branching

cell septa hard
to discern
Neisser positive
reaction occurs
Neisser positive
reaction occurs
rosettes, gonidia


rosettes, gonidia

rosettes, gonidia

sulfur granules
"square"
motile: flexing and
gliding
trichome bundles




"transparent"
large "patches"
true branching


Incidental branching
Gram and Neisser
variable


"rigidly straight"

"chain of cells"

"chain of cells"

  notation: + = positive; — = negative; V = variable; single symbol invariant; +, — or —, +, variable, the first being most observed.
         Trichome shape: St = straight; B = bent; SC = smoothly curved; C = coiled; 1 = Irregularly-shaped.
         Trichome location: E = extends from floe surface; I = found mostly within the floe; F = Free in liquid between the f Iocs.
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                                       63

-------
2. Type 1701. (Figure  29c, d, and e; see  also
   Figures  19c and 20f.) Relatively short (10-100
   Hm),  curved  or  bent  filaments  composed of
   round-ended,  rod-shaped  cells  (0.7-1.Ox
   1.0-2.0 urn] contained in a  clear, tightly fitting
   sheath.  Cell septa are clear with indentations at
   septa.  Filaments  found   predominantly inter-
   twined within the floe interior with only sfjort fila-
   ments  extending  into the  bulk  solution.  No
   branching.  Gram negative, Neisser negative, no
   sulfur granules; PHB  frequently  observed.  At-
   tached  growth of epiphytic  bacteria  is almost
   always  observed,  making observation of  indi-
   vidual cells difficult.

3. Type 0041. (Figure  30a, b, and c; see  also
   Figures  19a, 19e,  and 23c.)  Straight, smoothly-
   curved or bent filaments, 100-500 ftm in length,
   composed  of  square-shaped cells (1.2-1.6X
   1.5-2.5 nm) contained in a  clear, tightly fitting
   sheath.  In  domestic waste systems,  it is most
   often observed inside the  floe and covered with
   heavy,  attached  growth. In  industrial  waste
   systems, it may occur extending  from the  flbc
   surface  or free  in the  bulk solution, and may not
   have  any  attached  growth.  Gram positive or
   Gram variable,  tending to Gram positive when
   found within the floe  and Gram negative when
   extending  into  the  bulk  solution.  Neisser
   negative; Neisser-positive  granules are observed
   infrequently; and a Neisser-positive (light purple
   color) slime coating may be observed in some in-
   dustrial  waste  systems (Figure 24). Intracellular
   granules are rarely observed.  No sulfur granules.
   The sheath is difficult to detect and is observed
   when cells are missing,  particularly  at  the tri-
   chome apex (Figure 30).

4. Type 0675. (Figure 30d, e, and f.) Very similar to
   type  0041, only  smaller  in  trichome  length
   (50-150 /*m) and cell dimension (0.7-1.0 jim).
   Covered with heavy,  attached growth in domes-
   tic  waste  activated  sludge;  may  lack attached
   growth  in some  industrial waste   activated
   sludge.  A  sheath  is  present. Gram positive to
   Gram variable,  Neisser negative. Neisser-positive
   granules occur; no sulfur granules.

5. Type 021N. (Figure 26a-f; see also Figures  21 d
   and e,  31 e, and  23a.) Filaments typically are
   1.0-2.0 ;tm in width and  100-500 jim in length
   and taper from a thicker basal region, often ex-
   hibiting  an inconspicuous  hold-fast, to a thinner
   apical   region,  often terminating in  loosely-
   attached  gonidia.  Trichomes  are  straight,
   smoothly-curved  or  sometimes  slightly  coiled
   and are found  extending  from the floe surface.
   Cell shape ranges from ovoid to  rectangular or
   barrel-shaped with clear cell  septa and indenta-
   tions at septa. Gram negative and Neisser nega-
   tive; may contain Neisser-positive granules. Cells
   may stain slightly Gram positive when they con-
   tain sulfur granules.  Spherical intracellular sulfur
   granules are observed  in situ infrequently;, re-
   sponse  to  the  S  test generally  is  positive.
   Rosettes are observed  infrequently. No attached
   growth. No  sheath is present; however, a heavy
   cell wall (still showing cross septa) often remains
   after cell lysis.

6. Thiothrix I. (Figure 27a-f; see also Figure 22c.)
   Straight or smoothly curved trichomes, 1.4-2.5
   pirn in width and 100-500  pirn in length, found
   extending from  the  floe surface. Cells are  rec-
   tangular (1.4-2.5 X 3-5 jim) with clear cell septa
   without indentations  at  septa.  No  attached
   growth. A sheath is  present. Gram negative and
   Neisser  negative; however, a Gram-positive reac-
   tion may occur when sulfur granules are present.
   Neisser-positive  granules may  occur.  Cells fre-
   quently  contain  sulfur  granules in situ and this
   organism  responds strongly to the S test. Apical
   gonidia  commonly are observed, and  an incon-
   spicuous hold-fast is  present.

7. Thiothrix II.  (Figure 25a-f;  see also Figures 20c
   .and 22d.) Straight or smoothly-curved filaments,
   0.8-1.4 jim in width and 50-200 /^m in length,
   found extending from  the  floe surface.  No at-
   tached  growth.  Cell septa  without indentations
   are present.  Cells are rectangular (0.8-1.4 X 1-2
   jim). Gram  negative and Neisser negative, with
   Neisser-positive  granules  sometimes present.
   Cells frequently  contain spherical sulfur granules
   in situ and this organism responds to the S test.
   Apical  gonidia and  rosettes  are commonly ob-
   served.  Trichomes  may taper somewhat from
   base to tip.  A sheath is present, but difficult to
   detect.

8. Type 0914. (Figure  31 a, b,  and c.) Straight or
   smoothly-curved filaments, 0.7-1.0 jim in width
   and 50-200 jim in length, found extending from
   the floe surface or more commonly free in the
   bulk solution.   May  have  incidental  attached
   growth. Cells  are square-shaped  (1.0x1.0  jim)
   without  constrictions  at  septa. No  sheath  is
   present. Gram negative and Neisser negative, but
   may stain Gram  positive when substantial sulfur
   granules are present.  Neisser  positive granules
   may  occur.  May  contain  intracellular  sulfur
   granules, which appear  square  rather  than
   spherical  as  observed for  other filamentous
   microorganisms.  Does not respond to the S test.

9. Beggiatoa spp. (Figure 32a and b.) Large,  straight
   filaments, 1.0-3.0 (irrt in width and  100-500
   jim in length,  found  free in the bulk solution and
                                                 64

-------
Figure 29. Sphaerotilusnatans (a, band c) and type 1701 (d, eand fl (aand d lOOx phase constrast; bar = 100
          phase contrast, bar= 10 ftm).
                                                                                                                     *
 Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                            65

-------
Figure 30. Typo 0041 (a, b and c) and type 0675 (d, e and fl (a and d 100 x phase contrast; bar = 100 pm; b, c, e and f 1000 x phase
          contrast; bar= 10fim).
Roferonco: Jenkins, etal., 1984.
                                                         66

-------
  Figure 31. Type 0914 (a 100x phase contrast; bar= 100/im; b and c 1000x phase contrast; bar= 10/im) (note sulfur granules in b).
                                                                                  JTt«  s'^i -••&-- -%-&^=' -,, / "^'.r -,j r^'^.
                                                                                  $ ! 1*9..if      **-   —   • " -*^"_* itii.   f
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                              67

-------
     actively motile by gliding and flexing.  Generally
     contains substantial  spherical  sulfur  granules;
     cell septa are  not visible when  sulfur is present.
     Without sulfur, cells are rectangular  (1-3x4-8
     /tm). No attached growth. No sheath. Gram neg-
     ative and Neisser negative;  however, cells may
     stain Gram  positive when substantial sulfur  is
     present. Neisser-positive granules may occur.

 10.  Type  1851. (Figure 32c and d; see also  Figures
     19d and 23d.) Straight or bent trichomes,  0.8
     /tm in  width and  100-300 /im in  length,  ob-
     served extending from the floe  surface, or more
     commonly in bundles of intertwined filaments.  A
     sheath is present, but hard to observe. Cells are
     rectangular (0.8 x 1.5-2.5 /im) without indenta-
     tions at septa, or with indentations that are diffi-
     cult to observe. Attached growth occurs, which
     is  distinctly  perpendicular to the trichome sur-
     face.  Weakly  Gram  positive (a Gram-positive
     "beaded" effect) and Neisser negative.  No sulfur
     granules.

 11.  Type 0803. (Figure 32e.) Straight or smoothly-
     curved filaments of uniform diameter (0.8 /urn)
     and 50-150 /tin in length, found extending from
     the floe surface or at times free in the bulk solu-
     tion  (industrial waste activated sludges).  No
     sheath  and no  attached growth. Cells are  rectan-
     gular (0.8x1.5-2.0 /tm) without constrictions
     at septa. Gram negative and Neisser negative. No
     sulfur granules.

 12.  Type 0092. (Figure 32f; see also Figures 23b and
     24c.)  Straight, irregularly-curved or bent fila-
     ments,  0.8-1.0 /im in diameter and  10-60  /im
     in length, found mostly within the floe.  Cells are
     rectangular (0.8 x 1.5 /urn) without constrictions
     at septa, or with constrictions that are hard to ob-
     serve.  Neither  attached growth nor a sheath  is
     present. Cells stain Gram negative and the entire
     trichorne  stains Neisser  positive  (purple).  No
     sulfur granules.

     This filament often  is overlooked, or its abun-
     dance  underestimated,  until the Neisser stained
     slide is examined.  Filaments  appear  wider
     (1.0-1.2 ftm) in dried, stained smears.

13.  Type 0961. (Figure 33a  and  b.) Straight  tri-
     chomes, 0.8-1.4  /im in diameter and  50-150
     /tm  in  length, observed extending from the floe
     surface. No attached growth. Cells are rectangu-
     lar  (0.8-1.4x1.5-4 /tm). A true sheath is not
     present;  however,  a  slime  coating may  be
     present, appearing  as an empty "cuff" at  the tri-
     chome  apex. Gram  negative and  Neisser nega-
    tive and no sulfur granules. Cells appear "trans-
     parent" without any intracellular contents.
14.  Microthrix parvicella. (Figure 33c, d, and e;  see
     also Figures  23e and 24e.) Irregularly-coiled  fila-
     ments, 0.6-0.8 /im in diameter and  100-400
     /im in length, found in tangles in the  floe or as
     loose "patches" free in the bulk solution. Neither
     attached  growth  nor a sheath  is  present.  No
     branching. Cell septa are not observed; however,
     substantial intracellular granules may occur,  giv-
     ing a  "beaded" effect. Gram-positive, Neisser-
     negative,  and  Neisser-positive  granules  com-
     monly occur. Short,  clear  spaces may occur in
     the filament.

15.  Nocardia  spp.  (Figure 34a,  b, and  c;  see also
     Figures  16b,  23f,  and  24f.)  Irregularly-bent,
     short filaments, 1.0 /im in diameter and 10-20
     Mm in length, found mostly  within the floe,  but
     may occur free in the bulk solution.  A branched
     (true branching) mycelium often is observed.  No
     sheath  and no  attached growth. Cell  shape is
     somewhat irregular (1.0x1.0-2.0 /tm) and septa
     without constrictions are present.  Gram positive
     and Neisser negative,  and  Neisser-positive
     granules  commonly  are observed.  No  sulfur
     granules.  PHB  commonly is observed.  Abun-
     dance of this organism is best assessed from  the
     Gram stained preparation.

16.  Nostocoida limicola I. Bent and  irregularly-coiled
     filaments,   0.6-0.8  /tm  in  diameter and
     100-200 /tm  in length, found within the floes
     and free in the bulk  solution. Cell septa are hard
     to  observe;  when   observed,  cells  are oval
     (0.6-0.8 /tm diameter). No sheath and  no  at-
     tached  growth. Gram  positive  and  Neisser-
     positive trichome.  No sulfur granules. Resembles
     M. parvicella,  except in  Neisser-staining
     properties.

17.  Nostocoida limicola II. (Figure 34d, e, and f; see
     also Figures 16c and 24d.) Bent  and irregularly-
     coiled  filaments, 1.2-1.4  /im in  diameter and
     100-200 /im in length, found mostly within the
     floe. Cell septa are clear, with oval cells (1.2-1.4
     /tm in  diameter) and indentations at septa.  No
     sheath  and  no sulfur  granules.  PHB  granules
     commonly are observed. Gram and Neisser stain-
     ing reactions are variable. Most observed is Gram
     negative,  but a Gram-positive reaction occurs.
     Most often  the entire  trichome  stains Neisser
     positive (purple), but can be  Neisser negative at
    times.  Incidental branching is observed.  Note:
     Eikelboom and van Buijsen  (1981) state that N.
    limicola II is both Gram positive and Neisser nega-
    tive, and that a bacterium closely resembling  N.
    limicola II  occurs in  some industrial  waste acti-
    vated sludge systems, differing from N.  limicola II
    by  being  Gram  negative and Neisser  negative.
    Both forms are considered N.  limicola II here.
                                                  68

-------
Figure 32. Beggiatoa spp. (a and fa), type 1851 (c and d], type 0803 (e) and type 0092 (fl (a and c 100 X phase contrast; bar = 100 jim; fa, d,
          e and f 1000 x phase contrast; bar = 10 /K. m).
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                          69

-------
Figure 33. Typa0961 (aand b) and MterothrixparviceHa (c, dande) (aand c100x phase contrast; bar =100//.m; fa, dand e 1000x phase
          contrast; bar= 10/tm).
 Reference: Jenkins, era/., 1984.
                                                           70

-------
Figure 34. Nocardia spp. (a, b and c) and Nostocoida limicola II (d, e and fl (a and d 100 x phase contrast; bar = 100 /«m; b 400 x phase
          contrast; bar=25/£m; c, eand MOOOx phase contrast; bar=10/im).
Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.

-------
18.  Nostocoida limicola III. Bent and irregularly-coiled
     filaments,  1.6-2.0  p,m  in  diameter  and
     200-300 urn in length, found mostly within the
     floe.  No  attached  growth and  no sheath.  Cell
     septa  are clear, with oval cells  (1.6-2.0 fim
     diameter)  and  indentations at cell septa.  PHB
     granules are  commonly observed.  Gram positive
     and Neisser positive. No sulfur granules.

19.  Hallscomenobacter hydrosis. (Figure 35a, b, and
     c.) Straight or bent, thin filaments, 0.5  /tm  in
     diameter and 20-100 pirn in length, found  radiat-
     ing outward from the floe surface or free  in the
     bulk solution. A sheath is present. No cell septa
     are observed; however, empty  spaces in the tri-
     chome are commonly observed. Gram negative
     and Neisser  negative. No sulfur granules.  Fila-
     ments may  occur  in  bundles,   and  attached
     growth is variable,  ranging from  rare  to  abun-
     dant. This filament can be  easily  overlooked at
     100x observation.

20.  Type 0581.  (Figure  35d.) Smoothly-coiled  fila-
     ments, 0.4-0.7 jim in diameter and 100-200
     /*m in length, found  mostly within the  floe but
     may occur in  "patches"  free  in solution. No
     sheath and no cell septa.  No sulfur granules; no
     attached  growth.   Gram  negative and Neisser
     negative.  This  filamentous microorganism  ap-
     pears similar to M.  parvicella,  but differs in its
     Gram and Neisser staining  reactions.

21.  Type 1863.  (Figure 35e.) Short, irregularly-bent
     filaments,  0.8  /tin in  diameter  and  50/im  in
     length, found extending  from  the floe surface
     and free in the bulk solution. No sheath and no at-
     tached growth.  Cells  are oval-shaped  rods
     (0.8 X 1.5 /tm),  and appear as a "chain of  cells,"
     with  indentations  at the  septa. Gram  negative
     and Neisser  negative; Neisser-positive  granules
     may occur. No sulfur granules.

22.  Type  0411.  (Figure  35f.)  Irregularly-bent tri-
     chomes, 0.8 (im in diameter and 50-150 j«m in
     length, found extending from  the floe surface.
     Filaments  composed of  elongated, rod-shaped
     cells (0.8-2.4 fim);  constrictions at septa  give
     the appearance  of a "chain of cells." No sheath
     and no  attached  growth.  Gram  negative  and
     Neisser negative. No sulfur granules.

23.  Type 7702. (Figure 36a.) Short, straight or  bent
     filaments,  0.6-0.7 /tin in diameter and 20-80
     ftm in length, found within the floe and extending
     from the floe surface. Cell septa are absent and a
     sheath is  present. Incidental  attached  growth.
    Gram  negative and  Neisser negative.  No sulfur
    granules.

24. Type 1852. (Figure 36b.) Straight or slightly bent
    filaments, 0.6-0.8 /tm in  diameter and  20-80
    Mm in  length, found extending from the floe sur-
    face. Cells are rectangular  (0.6-0.8x1.0-2.0
    /^m) without constrictions  at septa. No  sheath,
    no attached growth. Gram negative and  Neisser
    negative.  No sulfur  granules.  This filament ap-
    pears "transparent," as does type 0961.

25. Type 0211. (Figure 36c.) Bent and twisted fila-
    ments, 0.3-0.5 /urn in diameter and 20-100 /tm
    in length,  found extending from the floe surface.
    Cells are  rod-shaped  with  clear constrictions at
    cell septa. No  sheath  and  no attached growth.
    Gram  negative and Neisser negative.  No sulfur
    granules.

26. Flexibacter spp. (Figure 36d.)  Short, straight or
    smoothly-curved filaments,  1.0  ^m in diameter
    and 20-40 /urn in length, found free in the  bulk
    solution. This organism is motile by slow gliding
    and flexing. No sheath and no attached growth.
    Cell  septa may be lacking. Gram negative  and
    Neisser  negative.  PHB  granules  commonly
    observed.

27. Bacillus spp. (Figure 36e.)  Rounded-end  rods in
    irregularly-shaped chains of cells, 0.8-1.0 /^m in
    diameter and 20-50 /ttm in length, found mostly
    at the edges  of  the  floe. Gram  positive  and
    Neisser negative.  No sheath  and  no  sulfur
    granules.

28. Cyanophyceae.  (Figure 36f.) Straight,  large fila-
    ments, 2.0-5.0 jum  in diameter and  100-500
    /tm in length, found free in the bulk solution. Cells
    are square to  rectangular (2-5x2-8  /tm) with
    clear septa. No sheath and no attached growth.
    Often  motile by slow gliding. Distinct green color
    under  transmitted  light observation. Gram nega-
    tive  but sometimes with a slight  Gram-positive
    reaction; Neisser negative. No sulfur granules.

29. Fungi. (Figure 37a, 37b, and 37c; see also Figure
    16a.) Very large trichomes,  3-8 /tm in diameter
    and 300-1000 /«m in length, found mostly in the
    floe. Cells are rectangular (3-8 X 5-15 /im). and
    contain intracellular  granules  and  organelles;
    cytoplasmic streaming  may be observed.  True
    branching. Gram negative and Neisser  negative.
    No sulfur granules and no sheath, although  a
    heavy cell wall is present.
                                                  72

-------
 Figure 35. Haliscomenobacter hydrossis (a, b and c), type 0581  (d), type  1863 (e) and type 0411 (fl (all  1000 x phase contrast;
          bar=10/im).

Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                          73

-------
 Figure 36. Type 1702 (a), type 1852 (b), type 0211 (c), Flexibacter sp. (d). Bacillus sp. (e) and a blue-green bacterium (cyanophyceae) (fl
           (alMOOOx phase contrast; bar=
Roforanco: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                            74

-------
Figure37.  Fungus (a 100x phase contrast; bar=100jtm; 6400x phase contrast; bar = 25/zm; clOOOx phase contrast; bar=10/*m).
 Reference: Jenkins, eta/., 1984.
                                                           75

-------

-------
                                            Chapter 7
7.0 Appendix  3—Case Histories of Bulking
Control Using  Chlorination.

City of Albany,  GA. The City  of  Albany,  GA,  is a
20-MGD  (0.88  m3/sec)  (design)  activated  sludge
plant currently receiving 13 to 16 MGD (0.57 to 0.7
m3/sec) of a waste in which approximately 50 percent
of the  BOD5 and SS  loads are from industry (paper
processing  and  convenience foods  manufacturing).
The  plant experienced bulking  problems to such a
degree that, with only approximately 12 MGD  (0.5
m3/sec) of influent flow,  attainment of secondary ef-
fluent criteria (30 mg/l monthly average for BOD5 and
SS) was not possible.

At Albany, the  permanent HAS chlorination system
injects  chlorine solution  into  a  series of well-mixed
RAS wet wells. The installation  consists of a Wallace
and  Tiernan Chlorinator 2,200 Ib/day (1,000 kg/day)
capacity, and  a  2-inch (50mm) injector  with 2-inch
(50mm)  PVC  injector water and chlorine  solution
lines. The chlorine injection system is enclosed  in a
sheet metal housing for protection. The chlorine solu-
tion  line is a  2-inch (50mm) PVC line leading to a
16-foot (5m) long, 2-inch (50mm) PVC header with
1 /4-to  3/8-inch (6 to 10mm) diameter holes at 4-inch
(100mm)  spacing. The system was constructed in
November 1977 for $4,953.

Figure  38 presents the history of RAS chlorination at
Albany. When chlorination for bulking control was in-
itiated,  the  RAS chlorination system did  not exist.
Because of  the  urgency of  controlling SVI, chlorine
was added to a wet well where the entire RAS stream
mixed  with  primary effluent.  This  mode of chlorina-
tion  was commenced in Week 15 and continued  until
Week 26, when the change to  RAS chlorination  was
made.  Chlorine "was being added to the mixture of
RAS and primary effluent, and  doses of 5 to 15 Ibs
CI2/103lbs  (5 to  15  kg Cl2/103kg)  SS/day  were
needed to  control bulking.  Immediately  after  the
change from  chlorinating the  mixture  of RAS  and
primary effluent to chlorinating RAS alone, chlorine
doses  that  satisfactorily  controlled  bulking for the
mixture of RAS and  primary  effluent were "over-
doses" for RAS alone.  Figure  38 shows  that  even
though the chlorine dose declined during the change-
over of the chlorine dose point  [from 4.7 to 2.9 Ibs
C !2/103lbs (4.7 to 2.9 kg C !2/103kg) SS/day] there
was an increase in secondary effluent SS (and to a
lesser  extent  in  secondary  effluent  BOD5) that
resulted from floe breakup  caused by the  chlorine
overdose.

RAS chlorination has been practiced  with generally
excellent  results at  Albany  for a  period  of over
7 years. At various times, the target  SVI has been
changed,  and in some instances (Figure 38, Weeks
180 to 200), RAS chlorination was not initiated soon
enough to prevent secondary effluent deterioration by
a loss of  sludge blanket solids in the  effluent  during
peak flow periods. To illustrate the chlorine  dosing
technique  for bulking control, as employed by the City
of Albany, a  bulking  incident  is examined in  detail in
Figure 39. At this time, the target SVI  was 230 ml/g.
The chlorine dose was started at low levels and grad-
ually increased  until the SVI responded by stabilizing
and then falling. In the middle of this period (30 May
through 6 June), the SVI  fell  to below the  target
value.  The  RAS  chlorine  dose  was  reduced   in
response to this. On 18-20 June, the SVI dropped to
approximately 100 to 130 ml/g.  The chlorine dose to
the RAS was reduced and then turned  off.

City of San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control
Plant (SJ/SC WPCP), CA. The SJ/SC WPCP  provides
tertiary treatment  to 100  MGD  (4.4 m3/sec)  of
domestic  sewage;  during  July-September (the peak
load season), flows increased approximately 20% and
BOD5 loading approximately doubled due to cannery
waste  discharges.  Effluent discharge  criteria include
30-day average BOD5 and SS of 10 mg/l each and
receiving  water undissociated  ammonia  standards
that dictate virtually complete nitrification. The plant
has two stages of activated  sludge  with complete
nitrification and tertiary effluent filtration. It had plant
upsets due to  bulking  in  the  secondary activated
sludge system during the peak load seasons of 1979
and  1980. Interim measures  included  RAS  chlorina-
tion in  both the  secondary  and tertiary activated
sludge systems, and provision of supplemental oxy-
gen and ammonia to prevent bulking in the 1981  and
1982 peak load seasons (Beebe et a/.,  1982).

The importance of chlorine solution mixing  into the
RAS for providing effective filamentous microorgan-
                                                  77

-------
isrn control was illustrated at the SJ/SC WPCP. In the
first-stage activated sludge system, the initial chlorine
injection point to the RAS was through a PVC pipe
with a 4-foot (1.2m) freefall into a'20 x 16 x 13 foot
(6m x 5m x 4m) wet well. It soon became evident that
this  arrangement was ineffective. Extension  of  the
2-inch (75 mm) PVC pipe to a point  5 feet  (1.5m)
below the RAS surface in this  wet well virtually
eliminated loss of gaseous  chlorine, but SVI  control
was still inefficient. Doses of 8 to 10 Ibs CI2/103lbs (8
to 10 kg CI2/103kg) SS/day had  little effect  on  SVI
but created a turbid secondary effluent.

Following this failure, two alternate  RAS chlorination
devices were installed:

(i)  Diffusers about mid-depth across the full width of
   the aerated mixed,, liquor channels  leading to  the
    secondary clarification tanks;

(ii) Single outlet injectors through the clean-out ports
    about 6  inches (15 cm)  upstream  of  closed-
    Impeller, low-speed centrifugal RAS pumps.

The data presented in Figure 40 show  that the pump
clean-out port injection point, with  its superior mix-
ing,  provided  more  rapid, predictable,  and efficient
SVI  control.  Operating data indicated  that approx-
imately 20  times more chlorine  was  added  when
chlorine was dosed to the RAS well rather than to the
RAS pump clean-out port. As a result of this success,
a similar chlorine injection system was installed in the
second-stage activated  sludge  system.  It too  has
been  used successfully  for bulking control without
compromising the  nitrifying ability  of the second-
stage activated  sludge system. Injection  of chlorine
solution  into  the first- and  second-stage  activated
sludge system RAS pumps for over 3  years has  had
no deleterious effects on these pumps, even though
the second-stage RAS pumps have brass  bearings.
Impellers in all  RAS pumps are cast iron,  and great
care is taken  to  make certain that  chlorine solution is
never fed to an out-of-service pump.

RAS  chlorination for  control of filamentous  bulking
has been developed to a high degree at the SJ/SC
WPCP  (Figure   41).  Chlorine  doses  are  regulated
routinely on the basis of a target SVI value with input
from the plant microbiologist who  observes  activated
sludge samples on a daily basis during periods of RAS
chlorination. During past  peak load seasons, extreme-
ly low target SVI values (60 to 80 ml/g) have been
used in the first stage activated sludge system so that
high  solids  loading rates (30-50 ibs SS/ft.2/day)
(150-250 kg  SS/m2/day)  could be applied  to  the
secondary clarifier. To maintain SVI values  this low,
chlorine  doses   to  the first-stage activated  sludge
system often were high—in the range of 8 to 16 Ibs
CI2/103lbs (8 to 16 kg  CI2/103kg)  VSS/day. These
high chlorine doses produced significant floe destruc-
tion,  resulted  in  turbid  secondary  effluents,  and
caused increases in secondary effluent dissolved total
organic  carbon  (TOC) concentrations. The elevated
turbidity and TOC  increase from approximately 15 to
35 mg/l  could be  tolerated at the SJ/SC  WPCP,
because  the  downstream   second-stage  activated
sludge system readily polishes the effluent. Applying
such high chlorine doses and obtaining a high-quality
secondary effluent would be  difficult if the  first-stage
activated  sludge plant  were operated without  the
second-stage activated sludge system to capture the
fine solids.

RAS chlorination also is effective for bulking control in
the second-stage (nitrifying) activated sludge system
(Figure  42). At the chlorine doses used [2-4 Ibs
CI2/103lbs  (2-4  kg CI2/103kg) VSS/day]; 1.5 to  3.0
mg CI2 /I  dose in  the RAS stream), nitrification effi-
ciency was  unaffected. This observation is  consistent
with that of Strom and Finstein (1977). In the nitrify-
ing system,  the decrease in SVI  with commencement
of RAS chlorination  was much faster than it was in
the first-stage activated sludge system. Whether this
was due to  the  presence of the more germicidal free
chlorine in the nitrifying system, to differences in the
types of filamentous microorganisms  causing bulking
(type 0041 in the second stage, type 1701  in the first
stage),  or to differences in  system sludge  growth
rates is not known.

Case history of bulking control using hydrogen perox-
ide. City of Petaluma, CA (Caropresso et al., 1974).
During 1974, the City of Petaluma, CA, Water Pollu-
tion  Control Plant,  which treated mixed  domestic/
industrial' wastes,  experienced severe bulking  prob-
lems with SVI values in the range of 400 to  700 ml/g.
Hydrogen peroxide (as a 50%  V/V  H202 solution) was
dosed to the final  quadrant  of  a two-pass aeration
tank that was being fed primary effluent at the 1/4
points and RAS at the head end. Figure 43 shows the
doses and concentrations of  hydrogen peroxide used
over a  4-day period and the  effect on  SVI.  The
hydrogen peroxide  (100% as  H202) doses ranged be-
tween 9-68  mg/1 and were variously applied for 8-24
hr/day.  During  the  dosing  of  hydrogen  peroxide,
2300 Ib (1050 kg)   H202  (100% basis) was used to
bring the SVI under control  (from 550 ml/g to  300
ml/g). The  SVI continued to decrease following the
termination of hydrogen peroxide dosing.
                                                  78

-------
Figure 38.  Control of bulking by RAS chlorination at the City of Albany, GA, Wastewater Treatment Plant (Jenkins et at., 1983).
         6/ ILU 'X3QNI
                                                |/6iu 'SS
            3oarns
 '31Vd 3SOQ
3NldOlHO SVd
                                             79

-------
Fifluro 39. Use of target SMI to control RAS chlorination dosage for bulking control at the Albany, GA, Wastewater Treatment Plant
         (Jenkins, 1980).
    en  o  o
 c\i
o
s
LU
a
a
•^
u
        en
        co
    co
5.0


2.5

  0
              300
              200
              100
                              TARGETSVI  230 ml/g
                               _L
                                11

                               MAY 1979
                                          21
                                               31
10
                                                                                        I
        20

JUNE 1979
30
                                                     80

-------
Figure 40. Comparison of HAS chlorination effectiveness when dosing chlorine to either the mixed liquor channel or the HAS pump (Beebe
         eta/., 1982).
                     I	1	1	T
                                                                                       in
                                                                                       CM
                                                              CO
                                                                    CNl
                                                                    UJ
                                                                    CO
                                                                 y
                                                             CM
                                                             CO
                                                         U-l
                                                         X
                                                           CM
                                                                                       csi
                                                               CM      CO
                              CM
                                                              '3SOO

-------
Figure 41. SVI and chlorine dose to RAS in the two first-stage activated sludge systems at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control
         Plant, CA-1981 peak load season (Beebe et a/., 1982).
IL
                           i  ,•
                                                    CO
                                                      CM
                                            oo

                                                               LU
                        CD      CD
                        UD      UD
                                                                            CsJ
                                                                                   GO
                                                                            in
                                                                            CO
                                                  UD
                                                  CsJ
                                                                            CM



                                                                            UD     CSJ
                                                                            UD
                                                                            CD
                                                                            CO
                                                                            UD
                                                                            CM
                                                                            Nl
                                                            UD     UD
                                  
-------
Figure 42. SVI and chlorine dose to RAS in the two second-stage activated sludge systems at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution

         Control Plant, CA—1981 peak load season (Beebe et al., 1982).
1 1 1'
-
1 1 1
LO
0 SJ



                                                                         m
                                                                         CO
                                                                         esj
                                                                          Nl
                                                                                 00
                                                                                 C9
                                                                          its
                                                                          CO


                                                                          m
                                                                          CM
                                                                          
-------
Figure 43. SV1 response to peroxide treatment at the Petaluma, CA Water Pollution Control Plant (Caropreso et al., 1974).
                                  TT
                        8OO
                        700 ~
                        600
                        5OO
                       4OO
                       300 —
                       200 —
                       100 —
                      I   I   I   I   i  I  I   i   in
START
TREATMENT
                                                      84

-------
                                           References
This section, besides containing references cited in the
text, also contains a  more complete coverage of the
literature on  activated  sludge  bulk-ing,  filamentous
organism growth and  Nocardia growth and foaming.

AI-Diwamy,  LJ. and  Cross, T. (1978), "Ecological
  Studies of Nocardia Foams and Other Actinomycetes
  in Aquatic Habitats." In. Nocardia andStreptomyces;
  M. Modarski, W. Kurytowicz, and J. Jeljaszewicz
  (Eds.) Gustav  Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart,  Germany,
  153.
Anon. (1969) "Milwaukee Mystery" Unusual Operat-
  ing  Problem Develops." Water and Sew. Works,
  116,213.
Anon. FMC Corporation (1973) "Bulking Control  with
  Hydrogen  Peroxide: Case History,  Water Pollution
  Control  Plant, City of Petaluma,  Sonoma, CA."
  Technical Data Polln. Control Release No.  41.
Anon. (1974) Bergey's Manual of Determinative  Bac-
  teriology 8th Ed., R.E. Buchanan and N.E. Gibbons,
  Eds. The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore.
Anon. FMC Corporation (1976) "Sludge Bulking Cure:
  Hydrogen Peroxide." Polln. Control Release No. 95.
  Municipal South, Nov./Dec.
Anon.  (1979)  "Hydrogen  Peroxide  Solves Bulking
  Problem at Coors'  Waste Treatment Plant." Food
  Engineering, November 1979 and FMC Corporation
  Technical Data Polln. Control Release No.  117.
Anon. (1981) Manual of Methods for General Bacteriol-
  ogy. American Society for Microbiology, Washing-
  ton, D.C.
Anon. (1983) "Thames Water Uses Chlorine to Control
  Bulking  Sludge." Water Research News,  10,  6,
  Water Research  Centre,  Medmenham,  Bucks,
  England.
Adamse, A.P. (1968) "Bulking  of Dairy Waste Acti-
  vated Sludge." Water Research, 2, 715.
Albagnac, G., and  Morfaux, J.N. (1980) "Traitabilitie
  Comparee en  Aeration  Prolongee  et en Contact-
  Stabilisation des  Eau Residuaires de Brasierie."  Trib.
  Cebedeau, 33, 63.
Allen, L.A.  (1944) "The Bacteriology of  Activated
  Sludge." J. Hyg., 43, 424.
Ardern,  E. and Lockett, W.T. (1914a) "Experiments on
  the Oxidation of Sewage Without the Aid of Filters."
  J. Soc. Chem. Ind., 33, 523.
Ardern, E. and Lockett, W.T. (19146) "The Oxidation
  -of Sewage Without the Aid of Filters." J. Soc. Chem.
  Ind., 33, 112.
Banoub, A.  (1982)  "Reducing Energy Consumption:
  How 2.Communities Did It; Woonsocket, R.I." Deeds
  and Data; Water Polln. Control Fedn. Highlights,  14,
  11.
Barnard, J.L (1978)  "Solving Sludge Bulking  Prob-
  lems." Water Polln.  Control, 77(1),  103.
Barnes, D. and Goronszy, M.C. (1980) "Continuous In-
  termittent Wastewater Systems for Municipal and In-
  dustrial Effluents." Public Health Engineer, 8, 20.
Becker,  J.G.  and  Shaw,  C.G. J1955)  "Fungi  in
  Domestic  Sewage  Treatment  Plants." Appl.
  Microbiol, 3, 173.
Beebe, R.D. and Jenkins;  D. (1981) "Control of Fila-
  mentous Bulking at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water
  Pollution Control Plant." Presented at the 53rd An-
  nual Conference, Calif. Water Polln. Control Assoc.,
  Long Beach, CA.
Beebe, R.D., Jenkins, D.  and Daigger, G.T. (1982)
  "Activated Sludge Bulking Control at the San  Jose/
  Santa  Clara, California  Water  Pollution  Control
  Plant." Presented  at the  55th Annual Conference of
  the Water Polln. Control Fedn., St. Louis, MO.
Beebe, R.D.  (1983)  Privately  Communicated. San
  Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant, San
  Jose, CA.
Blackbeard, J.R. and Ekama, G.A. (1984) "Preliminary
  Report on Filamentous Micro-organisms Responsible
  for Bulking and Foaming  in Activated Sludge  Plants in
  Southern Africa." Dept.  of Civil Engng.,  Univ.  of
  Capetown, RSA.
Bode, H. (1983) "The Use of Chlorine for Bulking Con-
  trol." Presented at the Institute fur Siedlungswasser-
  wirtshaft. University of Hannover, FRG,  26 Jan.
  1983.
Boyle, W.C. (1982) Discussion of Lee, S-E., Koopman,
  B.L., Jenkins, D. and Lewis, R.F. (1982) "The Inter-
  related Effects of Aeration Basin Configuration on
  Activated Sludge Bulking at Low Organic Loading."
  Presented at 10th Intl. Assoc. for Water Polln.  Re-
  search  and Control  Conference, Capetown, South
  Africa.
                                                 85

-------
 Benefield, L.D., Randall, C. and King, P.H. (1975) "The
   Stimulation  of Filamentous Micro-organisms  in  Ac-
   tivated Sludge by High  Oxygen Concentrations."
   Water Air and Soil Polln., 5, 113.
 Buhr, H.O. (1982) "Solids Distribution in a Step Feed
   Plant." Internal Report,  J. Greeley and  Hansen,
   Phoenix, AZ.
 Butterfield, C.T. (1935) "Studies of Sewage Purifica-
   tion: II A Zoogloea-Forming Bacterium Isolated from
   Activated Sludge." U.S. Pub.  Health Rpts., No.  50,
   671.
 Butterfield, C.T.,  Ruchoft, C.C. and McNamee, P.O.
   (1937) "Studies of Sewage Purification: VI Bio-
   chemical Oxidation by Sludges Developed by Pure
   Cultures of Bacteria Isolated from Activated Sludge."
   U.S. Pub. Health Rpts. No. 52, 387.
 Caropreso, F.E., Raleigh, C.W., Brown,  J.C. (1974)
   "Attack Bulking  Sludge with H2O2 and a Micro-
   scope." Bull., California Water Polln. Control Assoc.,
   44.
 Carter, J.L. and McKinney, R.E. (1973) "Effects of Iron
   on  Activated  Sludge Treatment."  J.  Environ.
   Engineer. Div. Amer. Soc. Civil Eng., 99, E2, Pro-
   ceedings Paper 96-79, 135.
 Chambers, B.  (1982)  "Effect of Longitudinal Mixing
   and Anoxic  Zones  on  Settleability  of  Activated
   Sludge." Chapter 10 in Bulking of Activated Sludge:
   Preventative and Remedial Methods, B.  Chambers
   and  E.J.  Tomlinson,  Eds.  Ellis Norwood  Ltd.,
   Chichester, England.
 Chiesa, S.C. and Irvine, R.L. (1982) "Growth and Con-
   trol of Filamentous Microbes in Activated Sludge —
   An  Integrated Hypothesis." Presented at the 55th
   Annual Conference of the Water Polln. Control Fedn.,
   St. Louis, MO.
 Chudoba, J., Ottova, V. and Madera, V. (1973a) "Con-
   trol of Activated  Sludge Filamentous- Bulking.
   I. Effect of Hydraulic Regime or Degree of Mixing in
   an Aeration Tank." Water Research, 7, 1163.
Chudoba, J./ Grau, P. and Ottova, V. (1973i>) "Control
   of Activated Sludge Filamentous  Bulking. II. Selec-
  tion of Micro-organisms by means of a Selector."
   Water Research, 7, 1389.
Chudoba, J., Blaha, J. and Madera, V. (1974) "Control
  of Activated Sludge Filamentous Bulking. III. Effect
  of Sludge Loading." Water Research, 8, 231.
Chudoba, J., Dohanyos, M. and Grau, P. (1982) "Con-
  trol of Activated Sludge Filamentous Bulking. IV.  Ef-
  fect  of Sludge Regeneration."  Water  Sci.  and
  Techno!., 14, 73.
Cole, C.A., Stamberg, J.B. and Bishop,  D.F. (1973)
   "Hydrogen Peroxide Cures Filamentous Growth in
  Activated Sludge." J. Water  Polln. Control Fedn.,
  45,  829.
Cooke, W.B. and Ludzack,  F.J.  (1958) "Predaceous
  Fungi   Behavior  in  Activated Sludge Systems."
  Sewage and Ind. Wastes, 30,  1490.
Cooke, W.B. and Pipes, W.O. (1970) "The Occurrence
  of Fungi in Activated  Sludge." Mycopath. Mycop.
  Appl., 40, 249.
Curtis, E.J.C. (1969) "Sewage Fungus: Its Nature and
  Effects." Water Research, 3, 280.
Cyrus, Z.  and Sladka, A. (1970) "Several Interesting
  Organisms  Present in Activated Sludge." Hydro-
  biologia, 35, 383.
Daigger, G.T., Robbins,  M.H.,  Jr. and Marshall,  B.R.
  (1983)  "The Design of  a Selector  to Control  Low
  F/M Filamentous  Bulking." Presented  at the 50th
  Annual  Conference, Water  Polln.  Control  Fedn.,
  Atlanta, GA.
Daigger, G.T. and Roper, R.E.,  Jr. (1984),"The Rela-
  tionship Between SVI and Activated Sludge Settling
  Characteristics." In Press, J. Water Polln. Control
  Fedn.
Dhaliwal, B.S. (1979) "Nocardia Amarae and Activated
  Sludge Foaming;" J. Water Polln. Control Fedn., 51,
  344.
Dias, F.F. and Bhat, J.V.  (1964) "Microbial Ecology of
  Activated Sludge.  I.  Dominant  Bacteria." Appl.
  Microbiol. 12, 412.
Dias, F.F., Dondero,  N.C.  and  Finstein, M.S. (1968)
  "Attached Growth of Sphaerotilus and Mixed Popu-
  lations  in a  Continuous-Flow Apparatus." Appl.
  Microbiol., 16, 1191.
Dick,  R.I. and  Vesilind, P.A.  (1969) "The Sludge
  Volume Index—What is it?" J. Water Polln. Control
  Fedn., 41, 1285.
Donaldson, W. (1982) "Some Notes on the Operation
  of Sewage Treatment  Works." Sewage Works, 4,
  48.
Dondero, N.C. (1961), "Sphaerotilus: Its Nature and
  Economic Significance." Advances  in Appl. Micro-
  biol., 3, 77. New York: Academic Press.
Dondero,  N.C.,  Phillips, R.A.  and Heukelekian, H.
  (1961)  "Isolation and Preservation of Cultures of
  Sphaerotilus." Appl. Microbiol, 9,  219.
Eikelboom, D.H.  (1975)  "Filamentous  Organisms
  Observed in Bulking Activated Sludge." Water Re-
  search, 9, 365.
Eikelboom, D.H. (1977) "Identification of Filamentous
  Organisms in Bulking Activated Sludge." Prog. Water
  Technol., 8, 153.
Eikelboom, D.H. and van Buijsen, H.J.J. (1981) Micro-
  scopic Sludge Investigation Manual. TNO Research
  Institute for  Environmental Hygiene.  The
  Netherlands.
Eikelboom, D.H. (1982a) "Biosorption and Prevention
  of Bulking Sludge by Means of a High Floe Loading."
  Chapter 6 in Bulking of Activated Sludge: Preventa-
 _f;Ve and Remedial Methods. 'B. Chambers and E.J.
  Tomlinson,  Eds.,  Ellis  Horwood  Ltd.,  Chichester,
  England.
                                                 86

-------
Eikelboom, D.H. (1982b) "Biological Characteristics of
  Oxidation Ditch Sludge" in Oxidation Ditch Technol-
  ogy, Proceedings published by CEP Consultants Ltd.,
  Edinburgh, Scotland.
Ekama,  G.A. and  Marais, G.V.R. (1985) Technical
  Guide for the Design of Secondary Clarifiers for the
  Activated Sludge Process. Water Research Commis-
  sion, Pretoria, RSA.
Farquhar,G.J. and Boyle, W.C. (1971a) "Identification
  of  Filamentous  Micro-organisms  in  Activated
  Sludge." J. Water Polln. Control Fedn., 43, 604.
Farquhar, G.J.  and Boyle, W.C. (19716) "Occurrence
  of  Filamentous  Microorganisms  in  Activated
  Sludge." J. Water Polln. Control Fedn., 43, 779.
Farquhar, G.J. and  Boyle, W.C.  (1972) "Control of
  Thiothrix in Activated Sludge." J. Water Polln. Con-
  trol Fedn., 44, 14.
Farrah, S.R.  and Unz, R.F. (1976) "Isolation of Exo-
  cellular Polymer from Zooglea Strains MP6 and 106
  and from Activated Sludge," Appl. Environ. Micro-
  biol., 32, 33.
Faust, L. and.Wolfe, R.S. (1961) "Enrichment and Cul-
  tivation of Beggiatoa Alba." J. Bacteriol, 81, 99.
Finstein,  M.S. and Heukelekian, H.  (1974) "GroSs
  Dimensions of Activated Sludge Floes with Reference
  to Bulking."  J. Water Polln.  Control Fedn., 39, 33.
Franson, M.,  Managing Editor  (1985),  "Standard
  Methods  for  the  Examination  of  Water   and
  Wastewater." American Public Health Association,
  Washington, DC.
Frenz-el, H.J. and Safert, F. (1971) "Erfahren Uber die
  Verhinderung von Blahschlamm durch Chlorung  des
  belebten  Schlammes." Gas u.  Wasserfach, 112,
  604.
Frenzel, H.J.  (1977) "Some  Experiences with  the
  Chlorination of Activated Sludge for the Fight Against
  Bulking  Sludge in the Berlin-Ruhleben Treatment
  Plant." Prog. Water Technol., 8, 163.
Gaub, Jr., W.H. (1924) "A Bacteriological Study of a
  Sewage Disposal Plant." New Jersey Agr. Stat. Bull.,
  No. 394.
Gaudy, E. and Wolfe, R.S. (1961) "Factors Affecting
  Filamentous  Growth of Sphaerotilus natans." Appl.
  Microbiol., 9, 580.
Gaudy, E. and Wolfe, R.S. (1962) "Composition of an
  Extracellular Polysaccharide Produced by  Sphaero-
  tilus natans," Appl. Microbiol.', 10, 200.
Goronszy, M.C- (1979) "Intermittent Operation of the
  Extended Aeration Process for Small Systems." J.
  Water Polln. Control Fedn., 51, 274.
Goronszy, M.C.  and Barnes,  D. (1979) "Continuous
  Single Vessel1 Activated Sludge Treatment of Dairy
  Wastes."  Proc.  87th Amen. Inst.  Chem. Eng.,
  Boston, MA.
Grau, P., Chudoba, J. and  Dohanyos,  M.  (1982)
  "Theory and Practice of Accumulation-Regeneration
  Approach  to the  Control  of Activated Sludge Fila-
  mentous Bulking." Chapter 7 in Bulking of Activated
  Sludge: Preventative  and Remedial  Methods.  B.
  Chambers and E.J. Tomlinson, Eds., Ellis Horwood
  Ltd., C hichester, England.
Greenberg, A.E., Klein, G. and Kaufman, W.J. (1955)
  "Effect of Phosphorus  on the  Activated Sludge
  Process." Sewage and Ind. Wastes, 27, 277.
Hale, F.D. and Carver, S.R. (1983) "Viscous Bulking of
  Activated  Sludge." Presented at the 56th Annual
  Conference Water Polln. Control Fedn., Atlanta, GA,
  October 2-7.
Hao, O.J.  (1980) "Preliminary Report on  Nocardia
  Foaming." Sanitary Engineering and Environmental
  Health Research Laboratory, University of California,
  Berkeley.
Hao, O.J.  (1982) "Isolation, Characterization and Con-
  tinuous Culture  Kinetics of  a  New  Sphaerotilus
  Species Involved in Low Oxygen Activated Sludge
  Bulking." Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. Civil Engineering,
  University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Hao, O.J., Richard, M.G., Jenkins, D. and Blanch,  H.
  (1983)  "The  Half Saturation Coefficient for Dis-
  solved Oxygen: A Dynamic Method for its Determina-
  tion and its Effect on Dual Species Competition." Bio-
  technol. Bioengineer, 35, 403.
Harold,  R. and  Stanier, R.Y.  (1955) "The Genera
  Leucothrix and Thiothrix." Bacteriol. Reviews,  19,
  49.
Harris,  F.W., Cockburn,  T. and Anderson, T. (1927)
  "Biological and  Physical Properties  of  Activated
  Sludge." Waterworks,'66, 24.
Haseltine, T.R. (1932) "The Activated Sludge Process
  at Salinas, California,  with  Particular Reference to
  Cause and Control of Bulking." Sewage Works J., 4,
  461.
Hattingh,  W.H.J. (1963)  "The Nitrogen and  Phos-
  phorus  Requirements  of Micro-organisms." Water
  and Waste Treatment, 10, 380.
Hawkes, H.A.  (1960) "Ecology of Activated Sludge
  and Bacteria Beds." In Waste Treatment, edited  by
  P.C.G. Isaac, London:  Pergamon Press Ltd.
Heide, B.A., and Pasveer, A. (1974) "Oxidation Ditch:
  Prevention and Control of Filamentous Sludge." H2O,
  7, 373.
Helmers,  E.N.,  Frame,  J.D.,  Greenberg,  A.E. and
  Sawyer, C.N. (1952)  "Nutritional Requirements in
  the Biological Stabilization  of  Industrial Wastes."
  Sewage and Ind. Wastes, 24, 496.
Heukelekian, H. and Littman, M.L. (1939) "Carbon and
  Nitrogen  Transformations  in  the  Purification  of
  Sewage by  the Activated Sludge Process. I. With
  Mixtures of Sewage and Activated Sludge." Sewage
  Works J., 11, 226.
	   II. Morphological  and  Biochemical
  Studies of Zooloeal Organisms." Sewage Works J.,
  11, 752.
Heukelekian, H.  and Ingois, R.S.  (1940) "Studies  on
  Activated Sludge  Bulking.  I!. Bulking  Induced  by
  Domestic Sewage." Sewage Works J., 12, 694.
                                                 87

-------
 Heukelekian, H. (1941) "Activated Sludge Bulking."
   Sewage Works J., 19, 39.
 Hohnl, G.  (1955) "Investigation into the  Physiology
   and Nutrition of Sphaerotilus  natans."  Archiv for
   Mikrobblogie, 23, 207.
 Houtmeyers, J. (1978) "Relations Between Substrate
   Feeding  Pattern and  Development of Filamentous
   Bacteria in Activated Sludge Processes." Agriculture
   (Belgium), 26, 1.
 Houtmeyers, J.,  van den Eynde,  E.,  Poffe, R. and
   Verachtert, H. (1980)  "Relations Between Substrate
   Feeding  Pattern and  Development of Filamentous
   Bacteria in Activated Sludge. I. Influence  of Process
   Parameters." European J.  Appl.  Microbiol.  Bio-
   technol., 9, 63.
 Hunerburg, K., Sarfert, F. and Frenzel, H.J. (1970) "Ein
   Beitrag zum Problem Blahschlamm." Gas.  u. Wasser-
   fach.,  111,7.
 Ingols, R.S. and Heukelekian,  H.  (1940) "Studies on
   Activated Sludge Bulking. III. Bulking of Sludge Fed
   with Pure Substances and Supplied with Different
   Amounts of Oxygen." Sewage Works J., 12, 849.
 Jenkins,  D.  (1980) "The Control of Activated Sludge
   Bulking." Presented at the  52nd Annual California
   Water  Polln. Control Assoc. Conference,  Monterey,
   CA.
 Jenkins, D., Parker, D.S., van Neikerk, A.M., Shao, Y-J
   and Lee, S-E. (1983) "Relationship Between Bench
   Scale and Prototype Activated Sludge Systems." In
   Scale-up of Water and Wastewater Treatment Pro-
   cesses, ed. Schmidtke, N.W. and Smith, D.W., But-
   terworth,  307.
 Jenkins, D., Richard, M.G. and Neethling, J.B. (1983)
   "Causes and  Control of Activated Sludge Bulking."
   Presented at  the 1983 Annual Conference of the
   Institute  of Water Polln. Control, Southern African
   Branch, East London, RSA.
Jenkins, D., Richard, M.G. and Daigger, G.T. (1984)
  "Manual  on the Causes and Control of  Activated
  Sludge Bulking  and Foaming." Unpublished  EPA
  report.  (Subsequent version published in 19'86 by the
  Water Research  Commission, Pretoria, Republic of
  South Africa.  Distributed by Ridge Line Press, Lafay-
  ette, C.A.).
 Johnstone, D.W.M., Rachwal, A.J. and Hanbury, M.J.
   (1979) 'Settlement Characteristics and Settlement
   Tank  Performance in  Carrousel  Activated Sludge
   Systems." Water Polln. Control, 78, (3),  337.
 Jones, P.H.  (1964) "Studies of the Ecology  of the Fila-
   mentous Sewage Fungus, Geotrichum candidum."
   Ph.D.  Dissertation,  Northwestern  University,
   Evanston, IL.
 Keefer, C.E. (1.963) "Relationship of Sludge Density In-
   dex to the Activated Sludge Process."  J. Water
   Polln. Control Fedn., 35, 1166.
 Keinath, T.M. (1977) "Activated Sludge Unified Design
   and Operation," J. Envir. Engr. Div. Amer. Soc. Civil
   Engng., 103,  829.
 Keller, P.J. and Cole, C.A. (1973) "Hydrogen Peroxide
   Cures Bulking." Water and Wastes Engineering, 10,
   E4, E6, E7.
 Koopman,  B.  and Cadee, K. (1983)  "Prediction of
   Thickening Capacity Using  Diluted  Sludge  Volume
   Index." Water Research, 17, 1427.
 Krul, J.M. (1977)  "Experiments with Haliscomeno-
   bacter hydrosis in Continuous  Culture Without and
   WithZoogloea ramigera." Water Research, 11, 197.
 Kraus, L.S. (1945)  "The Use of  Digested Sludge and
   Digestor Overflow to Control Activated Sludge Bulk-
   ing" Sewage Works J., 170, 1177.
 Lackey, J.B.  and Wattie, E.  (1946) "The Biology of
   Sparotilus natans Kutzing in Relation to the Bulking of
   Activated Sludge." Sewage Works, 12,  669.
 Larkin,  J.M.  (1980)  "Isolation  of Thiothrix  in Pure
   Culture and Observation of a Filamentous Epiphyte
   on Thiothrix." Current Microbiol., 4,  155.
 Larkin, J.M. and Strohl, W.R. (1983) "Beggiatoa, Thio-
   thrix and Thioplica." Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 37, 341.
 Lau,  A.O.,  Strom, P.F. and  Jenkins,  D.  (1984a)
   "Growth Kinetics of spaerotilus natans and a Floe
   Former in Pure and  Dual Continuous Culture." J.
   Water Polln. Control Fedn., 56, 412.
 Lau, A.O., Strom, P.F. and Jenkins, D. (19846)'"The
   Competitive Growth of Floe-forming and Filamentous
   Bacteria: a Model for Activated Sludge  Bulking." J.
   Water Pollin. Control Fedn., 56, 52.
 Lechevalier, M.P. and Lechevalier, H.A. (1974) "Nocar-
   dia amarae sp. nov., an Actinomycete Common in
   Foaming Activated  Sludge."  Inter.  J.  System
   Bacteriol., 24, 278.
 Lechevalier, H.A. and Lechevalier,  M.P. (1975) Actino-
   mycetes of Sewage  Treatment Plants. EPA  Report
   No. 600/2-75/031.
 Lechevalier, H.A., Lechevalier, M.P. and Wyszkowski,
   P.E. (1977) Actinomycetes of Sewage Treatment
   Plants. EPA Report 600/2-77-145.
 Lee, E.G., Mueller, J.C. and Walden, C.C. (1975) "Ef-
   fect of Temperature and Sludge Loading on  BOD5
   Removal and Sludge  Settleability in Activated Sludge
   Systems Treating Bleached Kraft Effluents." TAPPI,
   58, 100.
 Lee, S-E., Koopman, B.L., Jenkins, D. and Lewis, R.F.
   (1982) "The Effect of Aeration Basin Configuration
   on Activated Sludge Bulking at Low  Organic Load-
   ing."  Water Sci. and Technol., 14, 407.
 Lee, S-E., Koopman, B.L., Bode,  H., and Jenkins, D.
   (1983) "Evaluation of Alternative Sludge Settleabil-
   ity Indices."  Water Research, 17, 1421.
Lemmer, H. and Kroppenstedt, R.M. (1984) "Chemo-
  taxonomy and Physiology of some  Actinomycetes
  Isolated from Scumming Activated Sludge." System.
  Appl.  Microbiol., 5, 124.
Lewis,  R.F.  (1979) Privately  communicated.
  U.S.E.P.A.,  A.W.  Briedenbach Environmental
  Research Center, Cincinnati,  Ohio.
Matsche, N.F.  (1977) "Blahschlamm-Versuchen and
  Bekaufung-Weiner Mittelunger." Wasser-Abwasser-
  Gewasser, 22, 1.
                                                 88

-------
 Matsche,  N.F.  (1982) "Control of Bulking Sludge-
   Practical Experience in  Austria."  Water Sci.  and
   Technol., 14, 311.
 Matsche,  N. (1980) Privately communicated Dept. of
   Sanitary Engineering,  Technishce Universiteit  of
   Vienna, Austria.
 Matsui, S. and Yamamoto, R. (1983) "Measuring the
   Lengths of  Filamentous  Microbes  in  Activated
   Sludges using a Video Color T.V. with a Micro-
   scope." Presented  at  International Assoc. Water
   Polln. Research and Control Workshop on Design and
   Operation of Large  Wastewater Treatment, Plants.
   Sept. 19-23, 1983, Vienna, Austria.
.McKinney, R.E. and Horwood,  M.P.  (1952) "Funda-
   mental Approach to the Activated Sludge Process. I.
   Floe-Producing Bacteria" Sewage Ind. Wastes, 24,
   117.
 McKinney, R.E. and Weichlein, R.G. (1953) "Isolation
   of Floe-Producing Bacteria from Activated Sludge."
   Appl. MicrobioL, 1,  259.
 McKinney, R.E. (1955) Bacterial Flocculation in  Rela-
   tionship to Aerobic Waste Treatment Processes. Nat.
   Inst. of  Health, Progress Rpt. Proj. E. 645 Mass. Inst.
   Technol., Cambridge, MA.
 McKinney, R.E. (1957) "Activity of Micro-organisms in
   Organic .Waste, Disposal.  II. Aerobic Processes."
   Appl. MicrobioL, 5,  167.
 Merkel, G.J. (1975) "Observations on the Attachment
   of  Thiothrix  to Biological Surfaces  in  Activated
   Sludge." Water Research,  9, 881.
 Miyamoto-Mills, J., Larson, J., Jenkins, D., and Owen,
   W.F. (1983)  "Design and Operation of a Pilot-Scale
   Biological Phosphate Removal Plant at Central Contra
   Costa  Sanitary  District,  CA."  Water  Sci.  and
   Technol. (Capetown), 15,  153.
 Mohlman, F.W. (1934) "The Sludge  Index." Sewage
   Works J., 6,  119.
 Mulder, E.G. (1964) "Iron Bacteria, Particularly Those
   of. the  Spaerotilus-Leptothrix  Group,  and Industrial
   Problems." J. Appl. Bacteriol., 27,  151.
 Mulder, E.G. and Van Veen, W.L. (1963) "Investiga-
   tions on the Sphaerotilus-Leptothrix Group." Antonie
   van Leeuwenhoek, 29, 121.
 Neethling, J.B., Johnson, K.M. and Jenkins, D. (1982)
   Chemical and Microbiological Aspects of Filamentous
   Bulking  Control Using  Chlorination.  UCB-SEEHRL
   Report  No. 82-2, Sanitary Engineering and Environ-
   mental  Health Research Laboratory, College of Engi-
   neering and School of Public Health,  University  of
   California, Berkeley, CA.
 Neethling, 'J.B.  (1984)  "The  Control  of  Activated
   Sludge  Bulking by Chlorination." Ph.D. Dissertation,
   Dept. of Civil Engng., Univ. of Calif. Berkeley,  CA.
 Neilsen, P.H. (1984)  "Oxidation of Sulfide and  Thio-
   sulfate  and Storage of Sulfur-Granules in Thiothrix
   from Activated Sludge." Presented at the 12th Bi-
   ennal Conference Intl. Assoc. for Water Polln. Res.,
   Amsterdam, Holland.
Nurdogan, Y. and Jenkins, D. (1983) Unpublished data
  Sanitary Engineering and Environmental  Health
  Research Laboratory, University of Calif.,  Berkeley,
  CA.
Palm, J.C., Jenkins, D. and Parker, D.S. (1980) "Rela-
  tionship Between Organic Loading, Dissolved Oxygen
  Concentration  and  Sludge  Settleability in  the
  Complete-Mixed Activated Sludge Process."  J.
  Water Polln.  Control Fedn., 52, 2484.
Parker, D.S., Jenkins, D. and Kaufman, W.J. (1971)
  "Physical  Conditioning  of the Activated Sludge
  Floe." J. Water Polln. Control Fedn., 43, 1817.
Parker, D.S., Jenkins* D. and Kaufman, W.J. (1972)
  "Floe Breakup in Turbulent Flocculation Processes."
  J.  Sanitary Eng.  Div., Amer. Soc. Civil Engng., 98,
  SAI,  79.
Pavoni, J.L., Tenney, M.W. and Echelberger, W.T. Jr.
  (1972) "Bacterial Exocellular Polymers and Biological
  Flocculation," J: Water Polln. Control Fedn.,  44,
  414.
Pearse,  L. and APHA Committe  (1937) "Bulking of
  Sludge in the Activated Sludge Process of Sewage
  Treatment." APHA  Year Book, (Supplement to the
  Journal), 27, 164.
Peptiprez, M. and Leclerc, H.  (1969) "Les Baeries du
  Group Sphaerotilus-Leptothrix." Ann.  Inst.  Pateur
  Lille,  20, 115.
Phaup,  J.D. (1968)   "The  Biology  of  Sphaerotilus
  Species." Water Research, 2, 597.
Pike, E.G. (1972) "Aerobic  Bacteria" in Ecological
  Aspects of Used Water Treatment, 1, C.R. Curds and
  H.A. Hawkes (Eds), Academic Press, N.-Y. pp. 1-63.
Pipes, W.O. and Jones, P.H. (1963) "Decomposition of
  Organic -Wastes by Sphaerotilus." Biotech,  and
  Bioeng., 5, 287.
Pipes, W.O. (1974) "Control Bulking with Chemicals."
  Water and Wastes Engineering, 9, 30.
Pipes, W.O. (1978) "Actinomycete Scum Formation in
  Activated Sludge Processes." J. Water Polln. Control
  Fedn,, 5, 628.
Pipes, W.O.  (1979) "Bulking,. Deflocculation and Pin-
  Point Floe." J. Water Polln. Control Fedn., 51, 62.
Pittman,  A.R.  (1984) "Settling  of Nutrient Removal
  Activated Sludges." Presented at 12th Biennal Con-
  ference Intl.  Assoc. for Water Polln. Res., Amster-
  dam, Holland.
Pringsheim, E.G.  (1949)  "The Filamentous Bacteria
  Sphaerotilus, Leptothrix, Cladothrix and their Relation
  to  Iron and Manganese."  Phil. Trans. Roy. London,
  233B, 453.
Pringsheim, E.G. (1951) "The Vitreoscilla: A Family of
  Colorless, Gliding Filamentous O'rganisms." J. Gen.
 , MicrobioL, 5, 124.
Pringsheim, E.G. (1964) "Heterotrophism and Species
  Concept in Beggiatoa." Amer. J. Botany, 51,  898.
Pringsheim, E.G. and Wiessner, W. (1963) "Minimum
  Requirements for Heterotrophic Growth and Reserve
  Substances in Beggiatoa." Nature  (London),  197,
  102.
                                                  89

-------
 Poffe, R., van der Leyden, J. and Verachtert, H. (1979)
   "Characterization  of  a Leucothrix-Like Bacterium
   Causing Sludge Bulking During Petro-Chemicaf Waste
   Water Treatment."  European J.  Microbiol.
   Blotechnol., 8, 229.
 Rachwal, A.J., Johnstone, D.W.M.J Hanbury, M.J.,
   Critchard, D.J. (1982) "The Application of Settleabil-
   ity Tests for the Control of Activated Sludge Plants."
   Chapter 13 in Bulking of Activated Sludge: Preventa-
   tive and Remedial Methods, B. Chambers  and  E.J.
   Tomlinson,  Eds.  Ellis  Horwood Ltd.,  Chiehester,
   England.
 Rensfnk, J.H. (1974) "New Approach  to Preventing
   Bulking Sludge." J. Water Polln. Control Fedn., 46,
   1888.
 Rensink, J.H., Leentvaar, J. and Donker, H.J.G.W.
   (1979) "Control  of Bulking Combined  with Phos-
   phate Removal by Ferrous Sulphate Dosing."  H20,
   12, 150.
 Rensink, J.H., Donker, H.J.G.W., and Ijwema, T.S.J.
   (1982) "The Influence of Feed Pattern on Sludge
   Bulking." Chapter 9 in Bulking of Activated Sludge:
   Preventative and Remedial Methods,  B. Chambers
   and  E.J.   Tomlinson,  Eds.  Ellis  Horwood  Ltd.,
   Chiehester, England.
 Richard,  M.G., Jenkins,  D., Hao,  O. and Shimizu, G.
   (1982a) The Isolation and Characterization of Fila-
   mentous Micro-organisms from Activated Sludge
   Bulking. Report No. 81-2,  Sanitary Engineering and
   Environmental Health Research Laboratory,  Univ. of
   Calif., Berkeley, CA.
 Richard,  M.G.,  Hao, O.  and  Jenkins, D.  (19826)
   "Growth Kinetics of Sphaerotilus Species and their
   Significance in Activated Sludge Bulking." Presented
   at the 55th Annual Conference of the Water Polln.
   Control Fedn., St. Louis, MO.
 Richard, M.G., Shimizu,  G., Jenkins,  D., Williams, T.
   and Unz, R.F. (1983) "Isolation and Characterization
   of Thiothrix and Thiothrix-Like Filamentous Organ-
   isms from Bulking Activated Sludge." Presented at
  the 1983 Annual Meeting of  the  Amer. Soc. for
   Microbiology, New Orleans,  LA {Abs. Ann. Meet.,
   060, 270).
Richard,  M.G.,  Shimizu, G.  and Jenkins,  D. (1984)
   "The Growth Physiology of the Filamentous Organ-
   ism type 021N and its Significance  to Activated
  Sludge Bulking." Presented at the 57th Annual Con-
  ference, Water Polln.  Control Fedn.,  New  Orleans,
  LA.
Richard, M.G. (1984) "Filamentous Organism Identifi-
  cation Training Sessions,"  Report to the Water Re-
  search Commission, Republic of South Africa.
Rouf, M.A.  and Stokes, J.L.  (1964)  "Morphology,
   Nutrition  and  Physiology  of  Sphaerotilus disco-
   phorus." Arch, fur Mikrobiologie, 49,  132.
Ruchhoft, C.C. and Kachmar, J.F. (1941) "Studies of
  Sewage Purification. XIV. The Role of Sphaerotilus
  natans in Activated Sludge Bulking." Sewage Works
  J., 13,  3.
Scotten, H.L.  and  Stokes, J.L. (1962) "Isolation and
  Properties of Beggiatoa." Archiv fur Mikrobiologie,
  4-2, 353.
Sezgin, M. (1977) "The Effect of Dissolved Oxygen
  Concentration on Activated Sludge Process Perform-
  ance." Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, CA.
Sezgin, M.,  Jenkins, D. and Parker, D.S. (1978) "A
  Unified Theory of Filamentous Activated Sludge Bulk-
  ing." J. Water Polln. Control Fedn., 50, 362.
Sezgin, M. (1980) "The Role of Filamentous Micro-
  organisms in Activated Sludge Settling." Prog. Water
  Technol.,  12,97.
Sladka, A. and Ottova, V. (1973) "Filamentous Organ-
  isms in Activated Sludge." Hydrobiologia,  43, 285.
Slijkhuis, H.  and Deinema, M.H. (1982) "The Physiol-
  ogy of Microthrix parvicella, a Filamentous Bacterium
  Isolated from Activated Sludge." Chapter  5 in Bulk-
  ing of Activated Sludge: Preventative and Remedial
  Methods. B. Chambers and E.J. Tomlinson, Eds., Ellis
  Horwood Ltd., Chiehester, England.
Slijkhuis, H. (1983) "The Physiology of the Filamentous
  Bacterium   Microthrix  parvicella."  Ph.D.  thesis,
  Wageningen, Holland.
Slijkhuis,  H.  (1983)  "Microthrix  parvicella,  a Fila-
  mentous Bacterium Isolated from Activated Sludge:
  Cultivation in a Chemically Defined Medium." Appl.
  Environ. Microbiol., 46, 832.
Smit, J. (1932) "A study of the Conditions Favoring
  Bulking  of Activated Sludge." Sewage  Works J., 4,
  960.
Smit,  J.  (1934)  "Bulking  of  Activated  Sludge.
  II. Causative  Organisms." Sewage  Works  J.,  6,
  1041.
Smith,  R.S.  and Purdy, W.C. (1936) "The  Use of
  Chlorine for  the Correction of Sludge Bulking in the
  Activated  Sludge Process."  Public Health Reports,
  51, 20, 617.
Spector, M.L. (1977) "Production of Non-Bulking Acti-
  vated Sludge." U.S. Patent 4,056,465.
Steytler, R.B.,  Goddard,  M.F., Ambrose, W.A. and
  Wilson,  T.E. (1981) "Listening to the Activated
  Sludge Plant in Phoenix." Presented at the 54th An-
  nual   Conference,  Water Polln.  Control  Fedn.,
  Detroit,  Ml.
Steytler, R., Goddard, M.F., Buhr, H.O.  and Wilson,
  T.E.  (1982) "Watching the  91st Avenue Plant in
  Phoenix/'  Presented  at the  55th Annual Meeting,
  Arizona Water Polln. Control Assoc., Flagstaff, AZ.
Stobbe, G. (1964)  "Uber das Verhalten von belebtem
  Schlamn  in  aufsteigender Wasserbewegung."
  Berofrentlichungen,  des  Institutes  fur Siedlungs-
  wasserwirtshaft der Technischen Hochschule Han-
  nover, Heft 18.
                                                 90

-------
Stokes,  J.L.  (1984)  "Studies  on  the  Filamentous
  S.heathed Bacterium  Sphaerotilus  natans."  J.
  Bacterial, 67, 278.
Strohl, W.R. and Larkin, J.M. (1978)  "Enumeration,
 ' Isolation  and Characterization  of Beggiatoa from
  Freshwater Sediments." Appl.  Environ. Microbiol.,
  36, 755.
Strom, P.P. and Finstein, M.S. (1977) "Nitrification in a
  Chlorinated Activated Sludge Culture." J. Water
  Polln.  Control Fedn., 49, 584.
Strom, P.F. and Jenkins, D. (1984) "Identification  and
  Significance of Filamentous Micro-organisms in Acti-
  vated  Sludge." J. Water Polln. Control Fedn.,  56,
  52.
Strunk, W.G. and Shapiro, J. (1976) "Bulking Control
  Made  Easy—With Hydrogen Peroxide." Water Polln.
  Control, 11.
Tabor, W.A.  (1976)  "Wastewater  Microbiology."
  Ann. Rev. Microbiol, 30, 263.
Tago, Y. and Aiba, K. (1977) "Exocellular Mueopoly-
  saccharide Closely Related to Bacterial Floe Forma-
  tion." Appl.  Environ. Microbiol. 34, 308.
Tapleshay,  J.A. (1945) "Control of Sludge Index by
 .Chlorination  of Return Sludge." Sewage Works J.,
  17, 1210.
Thirion,,N. (1983) "Chlorination as a Control Measure
  for Bulking Sludge at the Dasport Sewage Treatment
  Plant, Pretoria." SA Water Bulletin, Water Research
  Commission, Pretoria, RSA.
Tomlinson, E.J. (1976) Bulking: A Survey of Activated
  Sludge  Plants.  Technical  Report  TR35, Water
  Research Centre, Stevenage, England.
Tomlinson, EiJ. (1978) The Effect of Anoxic Mixing
 , Zones upon the Settleability of Activated Sludge.  Un-
  published  Report. Water  Research  Centre,
  Stevenage, England.
Tomlison, E.J.  and Chambers, B. (1978a; The Use:of
  Anoxic Mixing Zones to Control the Settleability of
  Activated Sludge. Technical Report TR116, Water
  Research Centre, Stevenage, England.
Tomlinson, E.J. and Chambers, B.  (1979) "Methods
  for Prevention of Bulking in Activated Sludge." Water
  Polln.  Control, 78, 524.
Tomlinson, E.J. (1982) "The Emergence of the Bulking
  Problem  and the Current Situation in the U.K."
  Chapter 1 in Bulking of Activated Sludge: Preventa-
  tive and Remedial Methods, B. Chambers and E.J.
  Tomlinson, Eds.,  Ellis  Horwood  Ltd., Chichester,
  England.
Torpey,  W.N. (1948) "Practical Results of Step Aera-
  tion." Sewage Works J., 20, 781.
Torpey, W.N. and Chasick, A.M. (1955) "Principles of
  Activated Sludge Operation." Sewage Works J., 27,
  1217.
Tucek, F.  and Chudoba, J. (1969) "Purification Effi-
  ciency in Aeration Tanks with Complete Mixing and
  Piston Flow." Water Research, 3, 559.
Unz, R. (1979) Privately communicated. Dept.  Civil
  Engineering, The  Pennsylvania  State  University,
  State College, PA.
Unz, R.F. and Farah, S.R. (1976) "Exopolymer Produc-
 ' tion and Flocculation by Zoogloea MP6." Appl. En-
  viron. Microbiol., 31, 623.
van  den  Eynde,  E., Vriens,  L. and Verachtert,  H.
  (1982a) "Relation  Between Substrate Feeding Pat-
  tern  and Development of Filamentous Bacteria in
  Activated Sludge  Processes. III. Application  with
  Industrial Waste Waters." European J. Appl. Micro-
  biol.  Engineer. 15, 246.
van den Eynde, E., Houtmeyers, J. and Verachtert, H.
  (1982t>) "Relation  Between Substrate Feeding Pat-
  tern  and Development of Filamentous Bacteria in
  Activated Sludge." In  Bulking of Activated Sludge:
  Preventative and Remedial Methods, B. Chambers
  and  E.J.  Tomlinson,   Eds.,  Ellis  Horwood   Ltd.,
  Chichester, England.
van den Eynde, E., Geerts, J., Maes B. and Verachtert,
  H. (1983) "Influence of the Feeding Pattern on the
  Glucose  Metabolism  of Arthrobacter spp.  and
  Sphaerotilus natans, Growing in Chemostate Culture,
  Simulating  Activated Bulking."  European  J.  Appl.
  Microbiol. and Biotechnol., 17, 35.
van den Eynde, E. (1983) "Substrate Stress:  A Condi-
  tion for Safe Operation of Activated Sludge Systems
  with Regard to Filamentous Bulking." Ph.D. Thesis,
•  Katholieke Universiteit  de Leuven, Belgium.
van  Neikerk,  A.M., Wright, A., Kawahigashi, J. and
  Reichlin, D. (1982) Digestor Foaming Problems and
  their Causes at the East Bay Municipal Utility District
  Plant, Oakland,  California. Class Report to Professor
  D. Jenkins, CE 298-5,  Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, CA.
van  Niekerk,  A.M., Jenkins,  D. and  Richard,  M.G.
  (1984) Unpublished data. Sanitary Engineering and
  Environmental Health Research Laboratory,  Univ. of
  Calif., Berkeley, CA.
van Veen, W.L. (1972) "Factors Affecting the Oxida-
  tion  of  Manganese by Sphaerotilus discophorus."
  Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 38, 623.
van Veen, W.L., van der Kooij, J., Gruze, E.C.W.A. and
  van der Vlies, ,A.W. (1973)  "Investigations of the
  Sheathed Bacterium Haliscomenobacter hydrosis, a
  Bacterium Occurring in Bulking Activated  Sludge."
  Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 39, 207.

-------
van Veen, W.L, Kail, J.M. and Bulder, C.J.E.A. (1982)
  "Some Growth Parameters of Haliscomenobacter
  hydrosis, a Bacterium Occurring in Bulking Activated
  Sludge." Water Research,  16, 531.
Vega-Rodriquez, B.A. (1983) "Quantitative Evaluation
  of Nocardia spp. Presence in Activated Sludge."
  M.S.  Thesis,  Civil Engineering,  Univ.  of  Calif.,
  Berkeley, CA.
Verachtert, H., van den Synde, E., Poffe, R. and Hout-
  meyers, J. (1980)  "Relations Between Substrate
  Feeding Pattern and Development of Filamentous
  Bacteria in Activated Sludge Processes. II. Influence
  of Substrate Present in the Influent." European J.
  Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 9, 137.
Wagner, F. (1982) "Study of the Causes and Preven-
  tion of Sludge  Bulking  in Germany." Chapter 2 in
  Bulking of  Activated  Sludge: Preventative  and
  Remedial Methods, B. Chambers and E.J. Tomlinson,
  Eds.,  Ellis  Norwood Ltd., Chichester, England.
Waitz, S. and Lackey, J.B. (1959) "Morphological and
  Biochemical Studies on the Organisms Sphaerotilus
  natans." Otrly. J. Fla. Acad. ofSci., 21, 335.
Weddle, C.L. and Jenkins, D. (1971) "The Viability and
  Activity of Activated Sludge." Water Research, 5,
  621.
Welches, H.N.S.  (1983)  "Sludge Bulking in  Heidel-
  berg." SA Water Bulletin, Water Research Commis-
  sion, Pretoria, RSA.
Wells, W.N. and Garret, M.T. Jr. (1971) "Getting the
  Most from an Activated Sludge Plant." Pub.  Works,
  63.
Wheeler, D.R. and Rule,  A.M.  (1980) "The  Role of
  Nocardia in the Foaming of Activated Sludge:  Labora-
  tory Studies." Presented at Georgia Water and Polln
  Control Assoc. Annual Meeting, Savannah, GA.
Wheeler, M., Jenkins, D. and  Richard,  M.G. (1983)
  "The Use of Selectors for Bulking Control at the
  Hamilton, Ohio, USA, Water Polln. Control Facility."
  Proceedings, Workshop on Design and Operation of
  Large Wastewater Treatment Plants, Intl. Assoc. for
  Water Polln. Res. and Control, Vienna, Austria.
White, M.J.D.  (1975)  Settling of Activated-Sludge.
  Technical Report TR11, Water England.
White, M.J.D. (1976) "Design and Control of Secon-
  dary Settlement Tanks."  Water Polln. Control, 75,
  459.
White,  M.J.D.,  Tomlinson,  E.J.  and  Chambers,  B.
  (1980) "The Effect of Plant Configuration on Sludge
  Bulking." Progress in Water Technol, 183.
Williams, T.M. and Unz, R.F. (1983)  "Environmental
  Distribution of Zoogloean Strains." Water Research,
  17, 779.
Wilson, T.E., Ambrose, W.A., and Buhr, H.O. (1983)
  "Operating Experiences SRT"  Proceedings Work-
  shop on Design and Operation of Large Wastewater
  Treatment Plants, Intl Assoc. for Water Polln. Res.
  and Control, Austria.
Wilson, T.E.  (1983) "Application of the ISV Test to the
  Operatton  of  Sludge Plants." Water Research, 17,
  707.
Wood, O.K.  and Tchobanoglous, G.T. (1974) "Trace
  Elements in Biological Treatment with Specific  Refer-
  ence to the Activated Sludge Process." Presented at
  the 29th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue Uni-
  versity, IN.
                                                  92
                                                            *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRWnNC OFFICE: 19 91 - 5 it e. 18 7/1. o 5 5 0

-------