United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Center for Environmental Research Information
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
EPA 625/F-99/003
Abiotic In-Situ Technologies for
Groundwater Remediation
-------
' :• . |;. i i • •• '. i- • : ' •. •
"
,
5 -
Welcome and Opening Remarks
8:30AM Douglas Grosse, Conference Chairperson, ORD/NRMRL/US^PA -
Cincinnati, OH ;
Representative of USEPA Region VI, Dallas, TX ;
Plenary Session
Moderator: Clint Hall, Division Director, NRMRL/SPRD/USEPA - Ada, OK
Norine Noonan (invited), Assistant Administrator, ORD/USEPA -
Washington, DC
Walter Kovalick, Director, TIO/USEPA - Washington, DC
Stephen Luftig, Director, OERR/US EPA - Washington, DC ;
In-Situ Technology Implementation in Texas - New Rules
Chet Clarke, Technical Support Section, Remediation DivisionTexas
Natural Resources Conservation Commission :
Status of State Agreements for Innovative Technology Approvals
Mary Yelken, Nebraska Dept. Of Environmental Quality and Coordinator
for the Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation (ITRC) coalition
i
Overview of Abiotic In-situ Groundwater Remediation Approaches
Steve Schmeiling, Director of Research, NRMRL7USEPA - Ada, OK
|
Question and Answer Session i
ssii^-its1 Permeable Reactive Subsurface Barriers (Treatment Walls) '•
Status and Future Developments of PRBs for Remediation of Contaminated
Groundwater
Bob Gillham, University of Waterloo ;
;i
==:=••• Cft
«£!?»
TJ
-t-
• 6
PRBs for Remediation of Acid Mine Drainage ',
David Blowes, University of Waterloo
Long-term Performance Monitoring of a PRB for Remediation of Chlorinated
Solvents and Chrome [
Robert Puls, USEPA/NRMRL - Ada, OK !
Long-term Performance Monitoring of PRBs at DOE Sites
Nic Korte and Liyuan Liang, Oakridge National Laboratory, Colorado
Reactive Iron PRB Design, Placement, and Issues
Grant Hocking, Golder Sierra ;
PRB Remediation of Arsenic Contamination
Chumning Su, National Research Council and USEPA - Ada, OK
PRB Case Studies
Stephanie O'Hannesin, Envirometal Technologies, Inc.
Reception
i, ";:;";!;
i
i. 11 in in i iiiii i i
111 liiliil ij
•llillllllllllll lllllllllllllll
-------
PURPOSE
The development of cost effec-
tive in-situ treatment technolo-
gies is a major priority of re-
search and technical outreach to
the U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency's (EPA) Office of
Research and Development
(ORD) National Risk Manage-
ment Research Laboratory
(NRMRL), and the Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse (OSWER) Technology
Innovation Office (TIO). EPA is
interested in disseminating
information to decision makers
and potential users of these
technologies to promote less
costly, more effective application
to sites that have, historically,
been difficult to remediate.
There is a recognized need to
communicate current design and
performance data, technical feasi-
bility, implementation impedi-
jjieats^an d^cost. i nfo r mat j on Jo,
regulators, decision makers, and
other stakeholders who would ben-
efit from this type of technology
transfer. Although much informa-
tion is being provided on biotic
groundwater remediation ap-
proaches, less is known about
abiotic processes. Abiotic pro-
cesses will be the focus of this con-
ference by exploring and evaluat-
ing in-situ remedial options and
current practices.
WHO SHOULD ATTEND
Remedial Project Managers; On-
Scene Coordinators; State, Local,
and Tribal decision makers, ven-
dors, researchers, academia, and
consultants involved with the man-
agement and/or remediation of
sites impacted by contaminated
groundwater.
U.S. EPA Conference on
Abiotic In-Situ Technologies for
Groundwater Remediation
m
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
You may register online at: WWW.epa.gov/ttbnrmrl
or fill out the form below and mail, fax or email to:
SAIC (attn: Allison Hacker)
2260 Park Avenue, Suite 402
Cincinnati, OH 45206
fax: (513) 569-5864.
Email: hacker.allison@pol.com
Registrations will be first-come, first served.
Space is limited, so please register early.
Conference Registration Due Date: August 9,1999.
There is no cost to attend the conference.
Name
Organization/Company
Address
-City-State-Zip—---------'• ~ ~-: ..._-_._..m=
Country
Phone/Fax
E mail
You will receive confirmation of registration within 1 week.
For more information call (412) 741 -5462
HOTEL INFORMATION
Hotel Registration Due Date: Monday August 9
Renaissance Dallas Hotel
2222 Stemmons Freeway
Dallas, TX 75207
For hotel reservations call (214) 631-2222
(Reserve early. Government/conference rate rooms may
not be available after the due date)
When making reservations, please refer to the
Groundwater Conference to receive the special rates.
Government rate $89 plus tax (ID required at check in)
Conference rate: $139 plus tax
-------
-------
o>
.Q
0)
S.
0>
c
'E
o
o
.a
I
o
•o
W
G>
C
-a
a>
c
o
o
c
a>
§
SESSION A
Thermal Enhancement Treatment
Mechanisms of Thermal Treatment
Eva Davis, USEPA - Ada, OK
Steam Stripping and Contaminant
Migration
Kent Udell, UC Berkeley
Thermal Enhanced Extraction
Lloyd Stewart, Praxis Environmental
Technologies, Inc.
6-Phase Electrical Resistance Heating for
Organics Remediation
David Fleming, Current Environmental
Solutions
Radio Frequency Heating
Ray Kasevich, KAI Technologies
Thermal Conductive Heating for LNAPL
Treatment
Electrokinetics-,™
Status of In-Situ Electrokinetic Treatment
Randy Parker, USEPA - Cincinnati, OH
Other - TBD
SESSION B
Chemical Oxidation Treatment
In Situ Chemical Oxidation: Technology
Features and Applications
Robert Siegrist, Colorado School of Mines
Hydrogen Peroxide Treatment
Scott Huling, USEPA - Ada, OK
Potassium Permanganate Oxidation
Treatability
Robert Starr, Idaho National Engineering and
Environmental Lab
Cleanox Process In-Situ Chemical Oxidation
Robert Briggs, Mantech Corporation
Treatment of Contaminated Soil Using
Modified Fenton's Reagent
Richard Watts, Washington State University
Case Studies for In-Situ Technologies
DNAPL Consortium
Major Paul DeVane, USAF Armstrong
Laboratory
In-situ Oxidation of VOCs at the
Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant
Katherine Lowe and Frank Gardner,
Oakridge National Laboratory, Colorado
Other - TBD
Geotechnical Methods and Treatment
Containment Technology and Monitoring
VUlovaa=Beljin, ^Ujiivecsity^ofJSiaci
Randle Ross, USEPA - Ada, OK
Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Overview
and Issues
Bill Slack, FRX, Inc.
Fracture Emplaced Reactive Solids In-situ
Oxidation Treatment
Robert Siegrist, Colorado School of Mines
Lunch
Reactive Zones Treatment
Precipitation of Metals Using Non-Microbial
In-Situ Reactive Zones
Suthan Sutherson and Frank Lenzo, Arcadis
Geraghty & Miller
In-Situ Treatment of Chromium Source
Area Using Redox Manipulation
Faruque Khan, USEPA - Ada, OK
Redox Treatment Zones for Chromate
and TCE Remediation
John Fruchter, Battelle
-------
^
: ! I! ! ^
VOC Stripping Treatment
In-well Aeration/Stripping Technology Over-
view and Results
Boyd Breeding, Wasatch Environmental
Remediation of Solvents and Chrome Using
Recirculating Wells
Tom McKeon, Project Performance Corpora-
tion
Application of VFLUX to Assessment of Soil
Venting Performance and Closure
Dominic DiGiulio, USEPA - Ada, OK ,
Air Sparging for Remediation of Toluene and
Other VOCs
Alien Moore, ENSR, Inc.
Other - TBD
Reactive Zones Treatment (continued)
In-Situ Fixation of Chromium in Soil and
Ground Water
Jim Rouse, Montgomery Watson
Chromium Reduction/Fixation at the
Townsend Saw Chain Site .
Bill Walker, Geomega !
Chromium Reduction/Fixation Design and
Engineering at the Townsend Saw Chain Site
Nora Kiel and Jay Johnson, Harding Lawson
Associates
Panel Discussion: Treatment of Inorganics
Introduction: ;
Fate and Transport of Metals In-Situ
Joan McLean, Utah State University
Other Panelists:
Bob Puls, US EPA
Suthan Sutherson, Aarcadis Geraghty &
Miller ;
Bill Walker, Geomega
Ralph Howard, Region IV USEPA
Reception
OJ
ff
HttflM
E
o
c
o
Q
I " ' JT* '
I I I § (
In-Situ Flushing Treatment
Enhanced In-Situ Flushing: An Overview
Technical Practices and Design Considerations
•Remedial Agent Selection
•Fluid/ Contaminant Control
•Performance Monitoring
•Panel Discussion
Economic Considerations
•Remedial Agent Recovery and Reuse
•Endpoint Assessment (Impacts of Partial Source Removal)
•Technology Coupling
•Panel Discussion
Case Studies
•Surfactant Flushing with Recovery/Reuse
•Cosolvent Flushing with Bioremediation
•Others
•Panel Discussion
Conference Adjourns 12:30PM
111!
111), ,1
I ! Wl'dll'l* I !" "fit
i iiiiiiiiii ill in iiiiiii 11 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i iiiiiii i iiiiiii 1111111 ill i
limWIKplHffl£ll'HnlM
f, "iii, i nit
it
lljl 1.1
ifii 1,1,1
------- |